Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
LUA89-044 Vol 1
b E, j . .03 F. FILE FILE TITLE I . 5,- • . • • : .a_ . . Il i •-- ..vvvvv wn un................ Ian rmi ;.�; -;nnnYennnniiieiiellflilllllMllYntltll7ilgtlnYYpif�llRnRAlllll1rir71� wllliiismam 1.111111YIn11M1umNH1r1111111�1YY1111YY a -'uYllnlln.. .utw Ymrin ..nnnnnlrn . nYlsnNN:n. IIWIIIIIIYIIIIIIII.I.w..N1111rY11■IIIIN11..lIw■..IIIIIIIIrIWII■IIYYY - +MYYYY��N411H11/11■Y1711■Ii11Y1111H1111111111YYHil ■n11Ytn:YH1H HtuY aYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYi■' IYWIYYYI=Ym1■!Y = { WUY.rYY.rn6Sn' �•YYJ.N[a1YYYYUY:7A.JY. '1! YY,..aaa ueno.!t ndllnwu.. V.1111.1 or YI■—lnnww i�\ / l - .wnnwNwnnnas wrUI YSCnnonnn Y■IIIIIIIINIINIIYY• I '• �i\ �. ..-.+.. YYY�u111YYV' \LLI1H111:1.lIIIYl r n111l.NINIt1. /� \ •. �.i�`6 \ • . ,ram - '.-lY.YYU•• '.'� YYNU17:11lLLIII' iIIIHIIHIIYW' / I,'I,I �, 1• — .s . }}��VVV �� •.iull:lll..n.. YYYYY� ' \ _il �.�\ `-\ 'PAP. �I Z .�. YJdYY{ / K IY[:lll/ �INNIV. �MO I` 1 1 i - �` _ __ — 1 5 --- : ` - mil l■Y■■YY�io` ; -- _ ��' - „_� • ..�I [iiraYY'!v_ 0 G �' 111-1 '. Ir —'ice ■r —. ``= �! — '1 i ;! �.■�.. •N� 1__ - a G d /� �� i� �i i� I 1 Ilit. I�.I.I�i f 'fC� 1Tl!F: •.a1�.rin1% O �:� i�■�� '� I1i!' '�' t�l+�� ill�lt,ll ?�II �-. „mi Il,►.,I Ilu�l,' I - I �„�� I��L..� ������- I • �u��111111�N,I ��,�� �_. . - it 1._Ii11111111111 .=. �IIIIIL. i.1—=._ INlllll, „Il�ll � IIII ._IIIIIIIII�II ul :__��,�_ N IN�IIPIIIN I= il�li' • .:_.L.� �� hll �lll. ��� : ,, �6r.Ps� f :.;. �I / Z simii.......1..... 711,_,.,spri,... l em /��.__� IMF _ "� ;�'� rr 1�ft� � ' Q``411 � �'�°-.1...4.111 CI'--_'�� N,II:. -_.__�l ��` ='� %,:L�i r�� -- =1W . ',, �`• i— irk �■.. I< �. i C mo iiiiii mmin min i Ir—.-- lip 1�.� 1� pl.rrrr rn■�, ,rl•--+'.r �..•.r .�1 I'�I Sill. �K1. - 1 „,i\ I i — i.i� IIWII! = ��'' �■ -IIr� ..11 _ 7✓.� a -� """��s � �F— ■I.�IIL'- 1�= Irk 1— S�1 ■C- J. 1 1, _ Gia Oal, r �.� — ' �I!% �It�Hi i� .� I �I��I� �I ...... ��1■�:mill NwAlli - ��.�....r�l►,�� . _I • III I -_ I hZ� 'I_�I 1 Illka��ll 7 �!/.I���I'j�� 1 I: 1 -- 4 '► -� r- .F. IIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIII�IIIIIII�I 1111111/ II1� 1I11_111 III —1N11 II III illiii1111 IIII,,, I = !oi . 111111I111111 iI����11 , �� ��� 13 Nd 'Ii,:. ---- - III ��`,411111P11 Ii I E -- I — IIII :,., �I — lI +' mill �II'I l It, 11 1 . .• ► , i �ill�l�' I 1 I I 1 I BUILDING 2 EAST ELEVATION ■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■ SCALE: NTS m m zm THE BLUFFS AT LAKE WASHINGTON GGGLO. C. Architecturetune and Interior Design ( 1 1191 Second Avenue T Suite 1650 �J Seattle. Washington _ /1 98101 - 2966 0 206-467-5828 Phone 206-467-0627 Fax "'S' EMBER 15, 1998 14.4 41—igt ro f: ,OFIL., 4.a.:z., OCT 2 6 1E98 t _ ._� �,�.-1 _ -ice �`\ ; III 1114 =.11idimi 111111111 mu ........: i :.-_-_ -- 1--..--=r7—mi.A.B-a•I m ileaLlitt .. 01111011rei—i 5:ST1 .10- .....--1.--. —,.--,19...11.9 ,„_____,__ 1 _ ,:,-7 - 1- 2 _.: .' � 4-• f j_� I NiI�il� tigl�p. IIIIIII " 4 � . iY� -". ..-_. sue:=tr_ _ y itmiiii i l ,�4�:;. t �.l w poi BUILDING 2 NORTH ELEVATION soma sossmonoss SCALE: NTS . 1 S 110 2,1r THE BLUFFS AT LAKE WASHINGTON GGGLO. P L.L.C. Architecture and Interior Design ( 1 1191 Second Avenue T Suite 1650 1, Seattle, Washington ..... _1 98 101 - 2966 O206-467-5828 Phone 206-467-0627 Fax ffior _ SEPTEMBER 15, 1998 p"rr;, i-1 it w CCT 2 q i�`j R... gq,... 0 vz,( , ,........ ....., -." ._ v rL., --1111 'IME •_11,,,... 11M . ....... C.= inans!, IS: i'agaiiiiial;llllllllllllllll lllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll . _ INIVIA. . ' aUSIMIIMINII l it 1: • .t. ijiltnu , , • ,. !I SEAM ...v., .,..--...-.....111 ali--- i111111/11/11/11111iiiillig ll ,- 'VIM .. .„., ,... '1',' ..""AtraiitiNtitigratiltilaME:•• 111 iiimermelamialll lllllllllll MIll l 11 llllllllllllllllllllllll ....41...., • ... _. .„............,u,„„;..,....7,;,,. ........lllll i llll....,,,...i.m.mindin.frowed --* *IfitirOittilifrfri . , , ,111IttkalLI.V.IULHINUelintimilitnlIMI,Cafili I llllllll 11111111111mi llllllllllllll leinnw .°. 1 11111111h ...'," fee.',., ,, , . dant . '• \ ..•',jr:'..- .l', ,- - ; ";"iiiiitunnrAmminrmuin , .... _. . _ ....... ,,, , .... , . 1 , „ ..„.t, . -i-e-,,_:. .... ..i.stuumw2ismniutamisuinsuse, 1 r... .........1............. 1"...',... „-, 0, 0 ............., IMMO .1. .. •smompoina- —,----- imM-11.1111 kW' mi— Ili "MP' . ild•••••••".11;1 ,r: II ommulNIMI i III ;1 I I it==:-M1 ,,' . ' A .. . - E111111=1 li ...........""'"""mi i 111 ; i I Ell 110 III . 1111•1111,.S6,---11 /.... IMEN III ell :=1 1 .• Ii IIIE=III 111111111111. , -----:-----71L'...:'.:-,":1"::'.7::1 :- ‘,,, 4 rr ,=,,,,.... 1 ! 1111 ill 1 Inn li - ,1111,-....41.4=......-"'"'"'"L;IL.; --.............,-,1/ .1 w 011/ 0..., 4 ?a, 0 i-r) -_..=:.in -OM/ II!,I M. '''fa .7N 4%. .ta , •n-r•rmr:•1—•":-.-,-,,,:it inniec---....... .x.m..., 1 ...aarall......4.1.........irna•e.u. lic4-11,..i.,...'Alt,:l.":4;ra'•?!.AI; 1 ini!.....7".'-', * --?,'"f.% ?AP -N' ''"C;'_, f• - .1' I le#, P 101 tfie.'. ' Iv 4 11111,1111103111111111111 , 111111 ! , isimemocl h./ ........ i ,i.izei 1111111101011111U1 IMilli,...,--=---REMIIIIIIII 11111110111 ii 7.----4a—mwrziali.L:11111111.7 _TT . 1 ,. , 1 wi..,,._;..__...i.4, ..re,..F.,m •. - = %IV, .. ......,.........---,—, _._ i_._ L_._....._._ 1,- -,i.....•.....- .. .,- ..---mi.......mia.im•••........1 2., _............ i.e....mil.is Eta r•m i IN.---vvion -- .—- ,• -- 11 IIIIIIIII 1111111111111111Reill .:.-i-4:: anam,.. .........=. mailman.. 1 .ma. .111 a•Mill....4........" ' '''''m"r''' ..."" ,r, 110... • ,i,.4.• .f "4*.,',:-.7;-.*.tte,. - 1-7 -1=nom= Immo. =MIMI .1111111.11, I .I , 4--V" nmme IIIIII. ...1 tLf MMI.212 1111 ==."...m. IOU==iffillilii=i 11111111-11 wo.......= I:sit roman -- II - ....... 1 ..... , , -- ••VMMI I IA= la I= MIIIIIIMININIMMIN I.=MIM MMIMIll I iii• E. ..m... .. ••• •• I [ i: nimmi milimmiLlill,, , !. .1101211==i, 1 iiiiI5g19: , [ ci / IP Q 1 ---...,..,"-7.,..n ItIMMMM...-+---1--....;,..._.-.,-,,• •MENEM...-=‘=•IMINIIIMI mor "...`'........' •"" 11111•111MMir...1r=111•11 ••••• •'•.4.1, ,,-••.r.'"..- IN . I -. II IIIIIINIr ,....-.,IMMIIIIMMIIIIIIII ...•."...11.'= "'".•.1".`A......` ,' ., . 1110;110110111101 , ' I 16 ‘g .1.0 . di11 pail 1,' = a 144 ? IP piling:110N 111111111=1 __ _. 11111111111 iiiiiiiiLiiiiiiiii .... .— !WHIM NI NM illuillilli i 1 110111 I - , r---- . , - ------- --. .-- -- -------;-.744.1 _1 .-- 4 48, ., r 'rg,--T,,emeemaima ..,t.& .. 12104.04'•••iman Na."'" '." MT- I...11.111E="weomm•Nimimwm el.... ...."." 111111.El.......lwrd.11117102- 7.-.--..4 ):...., .---, ..i.m.'121111111= Filliniallimmumwm -willilliMill.11111.1111 -------.3==.' =11.11 1..1 I ...... ii ; --.."'"'""r-.-- r .* . • -14.NI 11111= P. q.P...# ....-.........-• a Irg - — 'a—'mm°''' ""'I no. .=.....,:.................m .., .,imini-6....elio rimemm,, ir....11 1 Alla1011.."-'i.I -'r• -.4...77'-. 7 ...), .,...1".1.3 ,--.---11 IMIMM EMI= 1 1.1 . ....,.17,f e,', ,. i ..--- =SMIMIMI Milt= 1. 11=1 iiiV'' - ''''2-- . ...,4 l'. * Ar /MIME = 1 V-er=1,•=......TMT:11..... .:" .."--- .--L,-MMM.MMM.M.M.IIIIIIIIIIIZT4P INIMIUM=1.11 !' ' 11334 ' I .1.11M11.11.1111111111."1.1R'''''--- .----- ----. 1•Mm 1111.1.111MMIM---- •,.- um ir• RIIIIIIIL. 11111111i I ill . ---- 111.1111100-1111/111111V Mill 111111111 _ - vemlirli , -I.,.„,.,... imiomme====.......... a .. . — I, ---„,,,- . MillilliWig ill'illifirqi-011--,- _ _---........—_...... 1 --- ---m-p. . 111111111111111M- .u -- .--..- ..,„,.....,.....-,............. ,, crammarmr.. "'amiwi a:4 -i .. .. or, • .,, .-RLIOC 7'--- - _.--,-....... .e.-4.ellis.',itar.. .40•cinp—A2STA747"."."‘7 .,;,.: i . --.*:, r ;ir '''' ''' -' --' a- -.'-....r.97177,07;?;..--.7..,„..-..,-,,,,er,.....• ,r-----""'.._•-••:•-••• ..--.....-.-..;::'"•""•••■1211=4"---- 1 i -- /'-'1.-",`tcode7195':%;•.:,:le:14??. 7.. - '. .'77.•,' ---- --.."19i„___ '' - ... -;•- -'''',. ..4._.,o17,,,• ..2.,..f,exe., -,.-- -4"--t---z•—.--•- --1* •-• "-"'4-14411L, i . - • . - , , -._ ,• . _. •Amf---.0...::-. •••11„.. -,-..,.-.-„,",„,----••-as... , ..1 BUILIDIN 2 WEST ELEVATION - -.. ...---.4....ii. .,;=,...,.,_ .......... . _ . Emom Emmossons - '..,- 44777 .-ZSI'll."14111.4......... SC4LE: NTS , ....." -.....- • • t'ciiir4-''.THE BLUFFS AT LAKE WASHINGTON . Mmismr GGGLO, P.L.L.C. Architecture and Interior Design a .. C -.1 1191 Second Avenue V lir Suite 1658 ...ma... .f' Seattle, Washington - -.rek 98101 - 2966 1.11 , 1[::]1 206-467-5828 Phone 206-467-0627 Fax www... .... SEPTEMBER 15, 1998 ....._. C C T 2 6 in r '. ,......_. • ----- IRYtNxllllflNtIHR01111 IiHptl►NNI�pNqqp�'1�p 1 .. HNppaMNNiggIii lINIHNHlinMILIM IMDROIL -- limm.mwm.NntlNNnuuuN•...nnnNu...1NNns/:111Hni111H 1�1IMIIMMOMNIMUMn NHIn.NHNNNHIINYNNIMMINNNMNNXNNXNNF H anig1[NHHfiNNIiNNNNNgY111YN11HHf1H/IINNRHNpggHf llIMIHIRMINHNMNNNNHuimm NHNNNHinunno NtiiiHHHNNIIHNHYHMtimmu.•.tRnaT9MMq+nir:RNMggn.^„""- I:s...lIil9N:uIMNNYI•IItIl.N111M1[I... .111YN+dp111[�MIIIMHNliraTYINNNH giMP1NnNN11HNNH1111H11 hilii 11111nl/nnifinur,unimimmirVit...:.N lr"ri wa.NNNtaMNNNN:.. .,...iYHXHNSNI/H11,Ii1N......ms...M ..,,moHnN,.,,u MNIINYNMInl11MMNM111.....NNNNUN, •IHtt,.Ni1XM 4,1" U „1!'NngI "I, 4-11-LX11HNNNl1:.1:-. i11NINYYfNNN.iHHNY1:lUYItNMNf1IlYHYNN111iH1�1�IMIHIINHMNNHNI/MNNHIINNMHIINNMtINHNNHHIINHNNHMXNNNNNIINIINNMIIIIMNNHNHi1:S11lIHNNNIIHH�tHNSIi[:1H1[HHHHNI - 1 1 I-X I.,E 1 1 n,-1...NgnWlAlN4oumnilllintimminn mffitiXIIt:[NMHI,HIINNN ilimmunimutimilor!IINHIIIIMIINNItNNHtth17!IMrtnNnn1LWO IEIV aNl XHI .;,, i.F:A: .7:Iiit111[/HI i1N11Y1l1nnMMNNMln1N111I1MtIM11MMHMlMNHIIxNn.IMuxY1NNMNNYnNNt.NMNIM1!Ni1HNlt!!ynNN..XxilNUNNYN1uwxNf/1RINNNWINI,:It1iNHYHi1 `:atNNNNIMHNY11NNn11MNMNNHMYNNNnNMMinul1111NN11HNHIINItiIiiNIIIIIMMMMIntiminntinlI smenti li11WNNYNHNYNNNNHX1tMNHNNNxN11N11NNN11W : IMHM.1YtY 1MHNIMItNI!lIIINNI!lNNIHNnr..NNNS111a1MMNNNMMY.nMMNNYIMnNNNNHNilI1X:1NYtn1XMIf1tXNnf!/HIHf:H1It::i!iNI;NgHII!lIIHHI[:NIHII'1lINNNNNNi..........wn. ,rt ` 1-i!,5ffeMNitilt:iNYYYYHYYNi:SYCYYYYYYYNHN...... �YfINHYYYYY......YYY:tYYYLYY.r,...NNXNNnr_NHMNNitgNNNNIIiInNYMtllitlifNNlN1HNii...SixNHN / - _ -tIX1YM IM1nN1,nMuqwN+uYN,XN11NNu4N •IliH111tN11 tNMl^•uuouuuuuuu..r-w..ali n iUmmi1nMt.NHHNHM lids' etnnu NYNHIaNNHNNNN{IIMMN NI / ` 1INNN 4NHNNI.M7nhannalannMMMp11Hno 11141 NHNMlinxl.MM miiiiliiiiiiliiiiiiiMNgNMgi�NN,HIM ri MUMYIHNNNNIINYI' ' iiruNHXHNi1NIN[NHN•1:1NNIMNpp r III \\ ;IWtt,IHIHIn+nI1tINNNnn1N YYMHMM'NN{IIIN„11MNNM MNI.NNNIINNXMnNXnmanNnrvNNNMIt1".BY. 11.11 IIIYI• @ll"ltiIISSIIL/iiNYHN1fi:Nt[Y.NHNIII� 7}• ////��,,, \` IN_[II-hill glilit11[11 lirm Hi+1,N"rriZZNHtIN11NHHtIMNNHN irint17'HNYIINYnNi'NNrne[r. J`-; i XNNSNINNIYNNNNNNNY .�5 ��- . WY 4,. .'I -'1YY NYYNYYYNNP MILIEYYY _ • . .,. tea♦, r!Y -•'7rY�tYMNlliiHl _— YYYYY NIM MHntt _ 'SriIIFNX111i► IN:IH11I1lgt �.���� • auu+.aMYN i i11„I.+F N Mi .ipM�M _ ,t f .�.' II. !..i.-N 1-'�_,---_,. ,fir---=a.....-= r.; - :asil i7ll►I*: - ,..;- YYY _ l ,, . .mil= �j!■}I 1 _�a��1 YYltitiil♦Y Y - i • �iY1iiL �- li �, v. _, ! _ .. - -� 6'., : �il.Ill. i .�II■� �i �l INiIgEr e'=�iri1 '{ice �•- mom I JIMIIIIIIN' 11.,_____ I ,...,......� ��.a�.�N.11111�/1(IIIIIIIIiI�[® � ,s, . 1 W ., .�Inr: 11 iTimise •� __: .I ! f Il '•y v A ' •nM1 46, aifr.>el �� -•aY 11'_- P 1 ,t• •r a�1�iaa ,1~��r �� Sit �> 1 �Esi���� - ' I`'wwi�e a�`` r [ ,I _ r _v,aw�,,l[ timl!_ I��, 1 �E ofC' '� t �.awlsl• ms• — • ��we 1� i _ �— i E-Zl sue. , • NE H ' >:- • i ,��/'�/, ,1 __-_ _ � Fir fall -. - �Y-t • INI: 7l I I I - It I i�i�i.1 i ,i • �, l -_-- _ _ '=i .: 2... : I f INA ,5 In la, i, -1 --1 -T ---1 1 s 1 r - .- .-�►J 1 - ^J p r w+P.-- M"- ram' 7y - ' .,,•.�weos�•. -N, 3 '7 (', 'a.s..., d,,,gt � BUILDING 6 WEST ELEY- O (TOLUNNOUS S�� ,., ` "" s,;.� ' , , :- SCALE: NTS 0 , ,0 20 THE BLUFFS AT LAKE WASHINGTON GGGLO, P.L.L_.C. Architecture and Interior Design ( 1 1191 Second Avenue 7 Suite 1650 ........... �l Seattle, Washington -- 98101 - 2966 -M 206-467-5828 Phone 206-467-0627 Fax SEPTEMBER 15, 1998 . C am.- y R se,—0 yy ! -ter 1 r 11.' ,,�/.. ' ,,,,Al.sc ''' - -"'"`' ri = '''.- 4., wo....r. s - - immilimmintaiimm___, * ,.., r ,=moo' - ....„p .:r..-A A s, warimar fM / 1� 44 =IMS1spliiimail .1 ..--..,_ -,—_„=.... .1111.1",' .=,...,,,, —9 lie;f i i • itk Yam , BUILDING & SOUTH ELEVATION (TOWNHOUSES) ���E ���iss��mo SCALE: NTS m 5 10 20 THE BLUFFS AT LAKE WASHINGTON GGGLO, P.L L C. Architecture and Interior Design ( 1 1191 Second Avenue T Suite 1650 /l Seattle, Washington 98101 - 2966 IIIIIIIIIMIIIIMIM Q 206-467-5828 Phone �� 206-467-0627 Fax SEPTEMBER 15, 1998 i.t,T2 '-'' 1 i - . � +•1 - r .,.+er Y' -. l`3K nH31lilNNNHz11 rail NHNIIHHH ,iti f '� "c % Inr --- nnnwemMMnnom tnwnmuepme inelli nmr,m,,HMINIK1......M t N IN..„..,NNli•Nll!Htl:PNHNPHr' -.t _ f,1, INa1,Er MNNNN1Nlosomm exnfWnY..NMewNU IYI!1MIIwexMMNNxn!l -liplwlaNM x...u...axxxNxa•xaaNNw,•111111 na,xMNNr -•�� (' .. nanww.wwwwwwwnwwww.ww wnwwwwe fYN� 1' ", ',� n nwwnw,r.EE..u....i;tHitfliani 313NNN}:HNi[et3iI Mlii 1111NNN11 NIIMMNMN 111 1111NMNNi gal4 N111111 V nI I ilWNNNH pMHNNNNNNH1{!M ... -:' ,_ �. -..;_ 5 I'-.r+!.i171S3•9::N[ItIHNY.»)7NNNI:N I INYx�luuaiNlu•er;;N;>:1":EEI;i;aIII Il lne1H131lH£11.ulNifwNxi.NH61M111 11M NNNlI1lNNIRII IlNNNIiNHNNfIHMMNM^;)nM:[twI1NMN11H[I nnillMI[HKY';e .,..-I:.. T f%- 7 '?•' .,\ N1.1M3 HHNASeHS:NH$t-NNNNEii.dHN4HH:pa:Mrx':xi:r.N'.Ilnli:lMAANNMN.6tiHilNiiHMNNNNNIENMHaEMm!MNNxxaglIA MellxMNE'HwxwNNYraxrIMHNIteM inttxwNYF:eitz r :f giii. �� '' - 11 f4I.91A'ij I 1 I:JMMHNnI:0xniIMIEMHnl It Il.riI II 1 1MNNna1N1INNMxY 11 111 iiira IrlNnHHE1fE.ENiiHUNN31tellMMliHxxM;Y=IS INPW:n±ufxNUMYaNaNlYxeexxuitmi io.Lnx..,xMNw.1 miff <ay,. ( _ -,t!. nN r;.wN3I II 111:1i3nrr11.141 ii;M1141 i llil pE:q!iiiu 411141 NnHM9NII Of II N1NIN11HelINHHMN M3NnMlitIl l E!ill MPH 1*N1INI1INa1111c:iN:li.1. ::'.MRNNI3SIIC!Ei iiun I.3!EHEi:!iHNiiMHNY.;1r2PNHPHH Y= ,..r_ _ - .. ] E Y 3-K,4NHN..lIMi3xHi:i3MNIffN1NHHgwewNI[iMNN3:HMN11.1.."IMPNNF[M:f LIUi 7911Pai MIINMNMHMNIIHl1YRNHHnNNHN11Y:i1MA•N.IurLNNNifttapi Irr.H11Nteggr f liT9il nwMNire.:a! isi ,. - �_ t k.:c7tiwgMMNNE[MIIMM•.iMN4:NNMaNifM7ixetfana;nelxnf•=1&tfn:.a.m.MMItaIINNHNNnNxuwN_NMN�twxxnuuwrxwlaxww•nY:NNx::NelNxflHE?HtINNNNq;[NHI�N.i1N[INAElE1[YMHNA:YE/AeF.].:Eii[d'f•:ai1Mf .- � Y �' z-"" e.i::r-axn.II N I 4;N1441 II lwvn111!1111 wnn11mIII II HMNIMHINRNHHHiiIINHKiiIl IIN NNlIE1mm. 14 EI:HIHNHNNN1iEllll lIdimrNE11.. II11I 11NnINHEiHMNH:1l ll MillIt...ll:iIH[IEU ..III3glw'LMEIi - '-' �-� _ _ l-...'l!E•isA[fNIiNII NI NNHH•:NjHIN3Ili111111 HNPEIHN3RH3NNYUNNNMNMMNMNNNMHNhNMMNEfnMHNN 111 I N■YYYYY11wYNYYMMNIW1Ni,flit. .,III NNNNII I ill xMMNNVu!x1NNxxIi i miell1i11:111.1 Y-y xn■NF!1INMNNHIMlIN IIfC1IHIl""'" .-u,HI 1*11..KI II lit-MM l73vuunw,.w.....4,,...a-.MNHNn1NIII 41 guu.luny ua....Jl lIl.uf gww!11 nxENHMNHHHNI!E[nflll"':IlI innt I N..IlNHmailiNxwf.I• `n « _ , II.YaiMitM}1HNx;1MIi I illM II It IN334 I NKHNxfIMnMl.H I .1711MHPRIMPRMPMIInwR In tl liii /i•HRM,dtRNInRR9!`MP.$.7NNR 1 NIl MIfNi1:1MxMMMNNweI?a1iiNN3il:YNNMNxNiIfM I 111111 a i J I I[NSH j}\��/�}y�(/. :- - r llla.r'.dM"INMNMII!11141"41 N1741111!11111MN11uNNNNtVyNNMwuxNIMN MUUTnllEnti iiiii1xMiF n wnxtMYNNn.NlflwxfMNMIrNNitMNxrsaa:axxNNNNUNxxesTeiuu!wNMNutftag HMil:S1.M'LNNF - T— �r . 1C C fI- NY1^?•i1.t:zwnNMYaiv 14■ilwa it J 4aMMN(Ixwwn j 1•wA t - a •411C.NIII�wnuw;titNN:NINNIfHNIIMNNNMw![AIFMNNiEN INI:IA[ESiNHi:iiilMS3NNnF:nNNNU NA+N-f[,N!'r!dNHNNHIIt ��� �-" �j '+`- d.i I 1 -•Y-3 H A lireMilremi 91Y[INH33 S157 1:Iime.YH:EN1iq_Y_NHN�_MYMM _YY.11111 NM::N.xNM____'L'1_.INMMYMMM-r NNiiN___.1.1111 e:YY�aIYJY��1EsuluYiNl�i�iI�JINI_j__Ii�I-11yY1i1YtIFI�L EIF ;Yi �,. R - ;..I 1 _\-,may} l ..: P .1 ! - rt _ _ �� _ `%� :-.. 'fifN�t�xH1iNNNl w EENHA+_e'� u u n.N■�at !imme 4.. _ e �S�,�.__ ,tlw c� u■�i air �� �` rrt a Yw. wnwMM 1:R!1 '�'av � / intiii i IlN11NNj - - NwNxnl .+ Na LC1SYYwf4Y L. ,aluu.: �I ! , , IF, rilaiamsomegrommummignommom-=`--....1 um: 01--IlimMiliD____..m. III 1 _ I { rr�a. S• ae z 71 4.A,� #r� l01i;idly mil, I_ ± & � r• all' 'mu2.4 Y� v\*' r,-;:.14.111 ------'-_ _.i._._.7--- - 1. .. . rp....,= =Jim— - gs—i: �•!( i -.,_,.�` �'" ,!�F' "IiVll�l�l�l ,ass-F! iaa.. Y�Im1�1�111�""<' ,N1 -_ :::,.r f.�� t . SC, ;- ✓ lr L ! •---Icr - 71 - - s':i 7�`i`" -/ ■■.. ■■■■••■■■■ m D Im 20 BUILDING 6 REAR ELEVATION (TOWNHOUSES) SCALE: NTS THE BLUFFS AT LAKE WASHINGTON GGGLO, P.L.L.C. Architecture and Interior Design 1191 Second Avenue ( T Suite 1650 tom. — "'1, Seattle, Washington 98101 - 2966 206-467-5828 Phone 206-467-0627 Fax S E P T E M B E R 15, 1998 _ C CT 2 6 121:3 1 MN I. --=, ,TD: r ti f :t of _—i• ,�I _— _�_ , .ram, _ -'F� +Cr mac,^T� f' � .III.1j �- 1■III..I C Ili ` 'e.'T` CARRIAGE NORTI� ELEVATION �� 1 l' -' �Gy{.fr. /'� 1�• �1 �� s r i nib u���r l. e rF` ♦IN .emu ai..rrarrWr.s x - •{y ,,l SCALE: NTS i _ _ ' t. '.. ' �4 iSI�l-1 / - il�i�I�i1II ,: il,.. 1 -i•l�l I�i�l�lli�l�l� i 'I!!�M. I MO :, 1U_I.IWI- a El - ice ' ui •I s .� :a .s+.w y"'77"9'�3''*Rr'•Ar•-. _ - j .FY'•� T r - '�s•'� '+,�1'..� -'9�'y yrs'�,�. r rrt •-r.ti r :d 'ar...... s.;+ -:.sS .t.or aw. a _iv. Je' CARRIAGE WEST ELEVATION SCALE: NTS — ;MOMt THE BLUFFS AT LAKE WASHINGTON ,i pis--- s•x`? • �, r a w ' ,_ GGLO, P.L.L.C. i--c-•— = r a --1 Architecture and Interior Design 1 1191 Second Avenue l` - Suite 1650 -' �CARRIAGE SOUTH ELEVATION Seattle. Washington _Z 98101 - 2966 i SCALE: NTS O 206-467-5828 Phone 206-467-0627 Fax SEPTEMBER 15, 1998 , ' -,T 9 n 1 g liee 0 /4 - ENTRANCE • I I '1 1 - • i 1 o • m s 120 STANDARD STALLS 1 27 COMPACT STALLS ' ; / I ;/ i j 1 I i 1 BASEMENT GARAGE /6<::: - , t „�y Cr, ' I GROSS FLOOR AREA: 16957 SF 1) 4 . UNIT TYPE UNIT CONFIGURATION THE T11� 1��F'` \\ A 1 bedroom, I bath I��LUF 2 bedrooms, I bath C 2 bedrooms, 2 baths D 3 bedrooms, 2 baths 62) AD a ?ID 2.a ZillaSmaLkarr .2.7WC m E©916 _ BUILDING • RI_ 'Ili . B2 l UP DECK I 1''II PLANTING 1 PARKING / '' TO� • CLEYA — , DECK— A7 HANDICAP PLANTING •c •���id .1 U` .P__D P _a B2 DECK �/ I --II _n� II C10 I A5 C3. B4 ���-_ I' HANDICAP D 1 C 1 0 / U . Li / J DECK 1, I DECK I DECK I I DECK 'I-1 DECK —~ V DECK'I I / /4.77I e l u-, a -.,, A FIRST FLOOR GROSS FLOOR AREA:16957 SF UNIT TYPE UNIT CONFIGURATION THE �7 j� G / A 1 IT bedroom, 1 bath f�f[7L1C, Ii1��,J Jf['S E E 2 bedrooms, 1 bath C 2 bedroom,2 baths • D ]bedroom,2 baths OV o a 10 SUS ,eP� -�D I::UILDING _DECK --- —— DECK B2 ` • • • DECK •• ` D J UP D1 I I :.IIIDECK ' I i A7 • d HANDICAP .—III DECK N- - L' . • . b __, , -iq •_, I UP I'• ,DECK I� `..rlI�- ' I�f B2 • C10 / A5C3 ' B4 I_. _ 1 HANDICAP D 1 c10 / . �. • DECK T :a. .di I'..' DECK) DECK DECK - _ DECK, _ DEGK ` m ‘. F SECOND FLOOR % GROSS FLOOR AREA: 14516 SF UNIT TYPE UNIT CDNPIGDNATIDN Tom. �.'�,.4��� /. 'r" A 1 badmen, 1 bath THE 1\Il.JI ' �\ / 8 2 Dadroans, 1 bath C 2 bedrooms,2 baths D 3 badroons, a baths MIRTH © e DID 25 @DT.dWAPCID4 AAB VIEC4ID 'WILDING • • _- -- - _c=== . 'DECK - DECK 'I1 IId B2 1,1i1 it .III DEC 02 �I u • .. I --- --_ DECK • A7 .'1, .. _- - _ HANDICAP II DECK!, , . uP 62 �!ll nn �i I . )../ 7�.� III 1. • a C10 I A3 C2 I. B3 I,. HANDICAP D2 L II C10 1 I DECK DECK /• /DECK ', DECK - __- _ — _ __ —_ _ DE i DECK I ' �I';l ,__ __'r_____,..', THIRD FLOOR / /( I - —-- - - --` GROSS FLOOR AREA: 13869 SF 4 UNIT TYPE UNIT CONFIGURATION THE 7I II y1 T���-r.}�{r+C / \ A 1 bedroom, 1 bath 1L LL LJ.I.e '�)L�1J 11 11 V/ - B 2 bedrooms, 1 bath C 2 bedrooms, 2 baths D 2 bedrooms, 2 baths D1NIIR04 ANNeXIFIRECIFIE . I; TT: SING • • WiliDECK i I",;'I III C7 DN !L t 'Oil • ..d N 1. ; _ 'DECIQ ILITh A7 HANDICAP „.., DECK 1 / 1 ' �II \_nin/ III —_ . . , . C10 I A3 C1 B1 D I HANDICAP .; • i C7 ' II C10 1 , I / DECK I' / I DECK DECK _ _ _ _ �! III• ' DECK DECK ' iii II. �1 •_// I-.— r \'I FOURTH FLOOR GROSS FLOOR AREA: 10767 SF UNIT TYPE UNIT CONFIGURATION _J��' / THE A 1 bedroom, 1 bath I:)L ]LT�I FS D 1 bedrooms, I bath C 1 bedrooms, a baths D .1 bedrooms, a baths Gd®0444U CD Pb ID 2.8 DEOL®OPIAMCD4 ldODCDIII4RS'1T3 1 .I • r � ri I',•" —P, I__ �r 1 1 a L C9 Al Al C9 UNIT TYPE UNIT CONFIGURATION IDI 'DECK A I bedroom, I bat i B2 bedrooms, 1 broth I eaC z bedrooms,]baths Lr J • D I bedrooms, z baths -- N__ LEVEL 2 DECK DECK DECK • THE BLUFF IF S------1 • I i -_ i II 1a T L , Er L C9 Al Al C9 PATIO 'PATIO �e m� ," 1______ u LEVEL 1 pp��4pp' PATIO PATIO i '• — PATIO PATIO CD ID B& a�� i 2961 4 e.02,CPCITIEC412 I:U LDI..l V G • .... _ ..k . I ,i ..41,•1 1_, ,I , .--'1-°" -• __J_ "!••:::.:1;:_____• '-111—•.1 1.1 •=,_ , , .,-_, ,.._.: ._--1 :•_-J A6 1 Al Al A6 171--:=• UNIT TYPE UNIT CONFIGURATION .‘DECK I , ,.. DECKII 1 . A 1 bedroom, 1 barb • .a.==cL . . 13 2 bedrooms, 1 bath I . C 2 bedrooms;2 baths — . _ 0 3 bedrooms,2 baths DECK I LEVEL 4 DECK ' --- DECK DECK li A • • THE 1:1LIEFFS -, ___-_____ __• _ 1 I 4--i•ur 1 I ''.., .1_ , r•-! ! '''! i! • EI ' -II ! L. , ,, L...____, __,I__,_ . 13 , nI I • 1 'd C9 I Al I Al C9 171 !11 DEc, i 1 . L.,_--. ECK I . 7 j • . ,. e , ,[___.=----! , • . . _. LEVEL 3 PI100117%1 1. DECK DECK I \ DECK DECK _ —.1 • L - 0 5 ITD 22.215 - VAILUIDIAPOZT APSCDOrITECTEI• i;UILDNTG. ....1.....•,.,,eme.er,o. . . t—o I - _— ' 1 : , . T THE IL L.UFFS . e i i 1 1 1 -„, ‘,. .--il 1, , i, i \„., v : 25 STANDARD STALLS \ 32 COMPACT STALLS W j J \ BASEMENT GARAGE . GROSS FLOOR AREA:19124 SF 1 I I 1 . 1 ./ I 1 ED 4: 725 I:U1IlLJDING - ' Mr—— Mil UNIT TYPE UNIT CONYIGOMTZON i A 1 bedroom. 1 bath B 2 bedrooms. 1 bath B2 C 2 b. oo drae, 2 bathe /1 D 3 bedrooms. 2 bathe • I-,ltl '. • ,1-- ID1 MIli e THE ILLlLJFFS _ \ C8 e. \ m DECK _ WARM • . A5 I DECK . MAIN ENTRY P L A N T I N d _ • L. 82 i \ 1 J `\� A4 it DECK - 1 B4 I C4 C8 t '_, HANDICAP ! \ i D1 i I A5 I A4, �jj. • FIRST FLOOR DES GROSS FLOOR AREA:19124 SF iii -- — ® t_ .. _ / • • • DECK -..,I ill UNIT TYPE UNIT CONPIGURATION - ,� A 1 bedroom, 1 bath I 2 bedrooms, 1 bath B2 - - C 2 bmdroam,2 baths n 3 bedrooms,2 bethm D1 . uP m V ill1 , Fli .' . "r• THE I.ILUIFIFS C8 1 �0 I . —. .- •k :, -a A5 a DECK : • DECK I B2 I' I V \ A4 A'''; • gq I C3 I C6 I I \ 'HANDICAP I A5 A4 ` } I D1 I I u DECK SECOND FLOOR ' .. II GROSS FLOOR AREA:18311 SF 1 — — • DECK ` DECK T .I DECK DECK - T J[ DECK - -_----__--_ DECK i-4i DECK _ DE— _'�. DECK = -_ _ [1---D recce PA9mP Ancaor IEC'YTa M UIW.aL- E `+v . • • ,. - - -- DECK' , ;III _F�_�_�_� I r�,. UNIT TYPE UNIT CONFIGURATION I I,I . A 1 bedroom, 1 bath I. ' U 2 bedrooms, I bath 'I,1I B2 c 2 bedrooms,•2 bats ,I1 O 3 bedrooms,2 baths - - '11 ' - DECK 11.1 UP ---- D2 r i I.y I'I • THE IYLUIFIFS LiC6 i'!;;; I: -' L I Dec A3 DECK - - - - I. ' I I'D B2 I 17II II II--I DECK I I i I —L, I, c A4 I B3 C2 C6 JI h !I I a HANDICAP II \. I D2 A3 ---- A4 \ i D •ECK THIRD FLOOR y j GROSS FLOOR AREA:15423 SF I - - J DECK I1I[�,-,!I DECK ,I I DECK \ DECK .0 1�— ___--- - __ _ :_ ':_�•i DECK "_K DECK -I DECK • MIMI = . UNIT TYPE VMIT CONFIGURATION - _ A I bedroom', 1 bath ! - _-_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ e 2 bedrooms. 1 bath . C 2 bedrooms, 2 bathe 1� D ]bedrooms, 2 bathe •�•i,' ON NI . . .Tr11 I C7 • I'.1'fl iI THE, It,LUFFS • e CB I DECK. 0.OW4ll0 .I - Z A3 1 L . s . .1 _ A A4 1 \r B1 C1 d HANDICAP I C6 \ li C7 1 DECK I A3 A4 FOURTH FLOOR i 1 DECK GROSS FLOOR AREA:12320 SF -�.1111 - - ____- ^r-,.-e. _ _ _ _{ _I� DECK 3 i __ _ ___ __ -_} DEDK i I, DECK ..'1 II -__ _ _ _ --_.— - DECK DECK DECK i Illi, 'I'lli'I I I ' DEN.IIDIAPODT UILDING r . -ttHiI I I I1+11+- IIIIIII II:III f. VT 1Y (1• - I • I , — — rC9 7 Al Al A2 A2 C9 DECK I ,DECK I r "Mr IDECK DECK • DECK DECK ,, iiii- Iiii-- _ ,I.�. _. ----- I 1 =,'---- --_ - LEVEL 2 -- _ GROSS FLOOR AREA:9350 SF UNIT TYPE UNIT CONPIOUPATION A 1 bedroom, I bath B 1 bedrooms, 1 bath C. 2 bedrooms,2 baths 3 bedrooms, 2 baths • . ueH1a11I 1-fff° .411 +Mt- VI _ 1— 1 r (1 . 1 _, J - —;____1J—_ C9 Al Al A2 A2 Al ! Al C9 PATIO j l gATIO ii. F. ,. ., PI ATIO PATIO PATIO PATIO PATIO PATIO f PATIO PATIO 1 ;___, . -. r___e—d fI'"i'¶ 1� ® D--2t. ® t'—d I LEVEL 1 GROSS FLOOR AREA:8560 SF ell�-7Lyr �i3L 1L'1C� _ I 1 •• .I ' iii, --- ,iii' i -II.... rM:_j al � I � -1_ il --OWL_ittly . 1 lel,�I DECK __-- I I a�i®I, ,�i DECK L — 1 i —-J -� - I rip i L-----J I 1 LEVEL 4 GROSS FLOOR AREA:8780 SF • • I1�,jjj,� II ii -54, I 1 "H-FRIT -WI. .7____, I 11 T frill I. —_—� r—_— I MT - T INI 1 i ghi DECK r mil -ipgio -___-FDECK , v , I Ilit.. -___- LEVEL 3 GROSS FLOOR AREA:9350 SF' e THE CLIV FFS ' • M1-2 4 ova ® © am lV i lliD1LL�1G • • • r t.I I I III ! ! fN IT �- 1 �.. T�VT TYN -— — - TI mr TP,<fi IT) .�— ! 1 P i If ,______ Pip j .__ 7111 • iii_ , i . iiii— , ----MN _J:j L_ iiii Mk- L______. Mir"W-i."—-—I- I , - =- LEVEL 2 • GROSS FLOOR AREA:9350 SF .UNIT TYPE UNIT coNFIGURATION A 1 bedroom, I bate • B 2 bedrooms, 1 bath c I bedrooms, 2 baths o a bedroom,2 baths_ . ): ej IllI I t4' 'tlfll 1irif, . 1 -11 r if 1 I I • I . • I I C9 Al r Al i A2 A2 Al i Al C9 PATI I gATIO i.__.--....__. 1i1. I 1 .. _ PATIO PATIO I PA fl0- ! PATIO f PATIO PATIO I PATIO-i_ PATIO m J. b m -- c-- z �, B�; 1 ! - i T; I LEVEL 1 I I ` GROSS FLOOR AREA:8580 SF • 0§ • THE lzL FFS IF Bon®eoeo�v �oesoaY>PCTa ® e to Bm " TTG . •. • . 1 - • -.• • I-=------7--- - • il, . . Ai I_____ In ..' , - _. Ai. -;',--S_= -=7- ---_--- __-----, , _10_,IIIIP----1 111/7,71_r___.7 . . irmis! I-11 1 'Illmill. , . __. r DECK TE miii ii_____I , A 41111 DECK-17 _ -Ill L---411111 i 1 I - . • i LEVEL 4 • GROSS FLOOR AREA:8760 SF . . . _. ''. .Thilin Le 1 1 111111111 .111{11r p 71 [ - -1 7itil IL . ...DB u..,. ..01 A " I - 1- 7 11 i___,, 1 /17.1! r 1 1 2 It- f DECK liar , 1 1 Aar Dm"--- . 1 1 -- Eil _1 i_________. ...L__ __I I L__ _11: 1 - I LEVEL 3 GROSS FLOOR AREA:9350 SF- THE litLUFFS IE mamma 51/11MAKEST A51:257122711 • 25 IWILDING . . . . . . . . .. • • . . . . • . .. . . . - • • -__.-- - -- .......,.7., .......,____,, . __ _____„. INTERSTATE 105 \ , . ' \ . .. . I . ..... . ••. ._-_,. .______. ----\ --- . _...7 ... - • ---- - . .._... , . ...--- , . \ .....,-.---.,0,. ,,,p glif47.4,14 - -. ..- - .' .-- ..-: :- •-/ - - - 1 .\ .. :4.:k . f.' '''"1"--triburo.r .s-ri • •". . -.- .••<,--\i .1;241, • -011.4-.---.. __ . 11 4„,........r. . ., -, ..... .. \ ........______ - • •,.. t,..,... ! \., .- -. ..„._,,,,___., . _i_•.---•-•.,• ,, • _ . .„. . t-4 \.--- .. ...,...\--,... ; _ le 7?---, . -,,„i-• -- ::: it ,la. riii ..,14 4 .•,. • - ,,, .,;: ••:-.., • • - . ' -'-.'• of? vs /074_-_.. -r-vilr )-1 .1--:-. 44, 7.: -Inik . V.'.1:,....• . ii ), ,, \ ..---:----- __ ..• .aa.itviti _II•m 1 34-.--",o' tat:-.3.1111, 4. ,..b.ilfroctli ,..... ,,,,..,/,,-,,,f. ._:1- ,.,:-. ,4,... .; k ''' . -- .4P-- ." •...-----/ - 'Aztru.,.,-...,..4.,.. • . v ... .1,0 i : ID (V . ,, ,. . ,...... I-J/3 '*9 .: -• :-...)...• .4.1+4,04 .__*•:_- —,..-2_:— .--e•- ipa.-,„ ,.... :. :•,- .4 • .- . N.,.. -,,,,-,°' '''' s-- . (0" 'X'''. - • , - - y• . "4/1pro „-.1%. ..-77.. a. :" . 41'- .4iitiv,U1.,•' -'.-.'rda, ,\..- . 14 •• — •-•., It• \ • . Drk_, 3. ek._. .. -- 4k* 4.is, 1_.....N.40.-3:4fraz.: -- ' ........ _ ,4....3,-# ••• fAst::_,-,j,', -...••- -t1404, ti. -- ._--,......-•. 7,1v „,..1.1. - ._7h,,-,,,......„.. .- .-.,_.t..,1,F,,.., -ii.w40-.. ,..).•c:-.7. ,Ica.:,.:„....._ ._,_....--...e.12.-tok ak __\__- ____._,-: • . . . ,lxv-A.04.. - ., ,..49 .-. __,..:_,.- - .:_. . -..ta.-- ._1. : . - i I' I. .1011011.T .,.;SWo.d...174.....e-. .. !.-'- ''' I. Ili i k _ _. . ...,. . Jr . ,... 40,.....-:..,.. .14... .7-._... ,- . .... , .....!. _ .. ... ..„ • . .\ .. • .. ,. - .:. ___, -,\.• . . . .... _ ....i.cr. _ _.,..... „,./. . ......._ , ...,- _ ............ \\/ . , .___ . ,. _ _.. .__. __ ... T.......... .. __ ...,_ [ -- _.„ THE BLUFFS ,..... ..... ., • ru---1 R N enton,Wasnngton . -.... .;... . • ,;• co . :at , 71116111DeSigCMP.P • L-1 ........ . __ LANDSCAPE CONCEPT PLAN ' • orth Sago.1,5CW • . . . . . . , . • - . .. . ,.. . " d _ ;.X INTERSTATE 405 r 0. ); ! . • ''' .;'74 i . Z_ - . \ 1 • -..... "+-:2r� .`yPEDESTFEphTpAll_•'-. i.PEDESTRIAN TRAIC.:T•••'-/... ae /. — E ifit Pftirreriary LaMSemeSchheduie \- ./ - \ \ / --. • c22— \',..1\\ • . .. :�ALL_ \ _ Jf a.r.Remm ,— ,, eA 0. Jff iwe...m�merawm.,ra^vemwhn M.. ,+.m® "" \ rONaL — _- env+nww.ma.nP.mmrm..F .>•.a...e.e.9an WAS0 a...o.mo..(awe 13:).a n.e...n..nmvnwe.aym. E a..+.d.d LK • THE BLUFFS, I a Washington�— — { ignG[oup Nara � �""=' Oa �� LANDSCAPE CONCEPT PLAN • L-2 • • . • . . . ' • • \ . . \ . . Z. . ..\- . - • ''. .-,-... . ' .. ' . . - . \ . . .• . • • 13 ' \ . .. . ‹- m • m . . . . ,--. .\ „.... . . . r _ ' • . • �. Now jo AID .I;(- • \ . . . ' ' . ) . .-s-.. :-1-•-•:"...-.:-.-'.':;...., . .-- •-•• .:, ....'-„.,:-.!..-::;;:..:.--±f.,.;:.::i: ::.';-:::.::-.•:!._ '-'........-.•, . ..q114% .-....,... . .. . • • -- - - -- - - PRoP A ' j:: EL 5 • _ Via_.; - - . . i ; , _ .:-.::-..!,..:...___..-___,_.-,.•--;: -•,-.-.,-..- . -. • -. _.-... LOT COVERAGE . - - • . ...---.--.-. - - . . . . . . . , . . . . . .. . . ,,-.:::-.......-- • . . . , . . . , . . . . . •. .• _ . : • BUILDINGS: x:: .. .... s._ .:. - . . : _ .. APARTMF IT R ,,I I, flIM n . - , ' � � i r1n' cc'. . . f ' - . s' n.0 Sizilr ',. ,,„, ,...._ . _,,_ At Coulon Park - ..,._ . s-_-±;:s:_..,..i;,,,,,_., .„ \ ..„. _ , . . , _ , ---- -- ____ --0-- () . - . . . ._./ .,:: r------ --- imbalki6a,•----'° • -Slel ri - ---,kgeA- . Af7r1q.D)‹.. 1.S es* . P. 0411Q , , ,or , 1c:q..., r 1 Ns i 4-KA N-rl _ FAH L -WITH r►� � �} � ���� __AP�� I a D dK SAi`I��I-A�1"' i7�, • Q 5 •l A I` . 'y,, Fes►-A®6 - o . - !`tom Oximen 49" i . Cm OF RENTON . . � E C E I V E . - - _ . R .D DEC 0 8 1992 - _ • C BUILDING DIVISION - - 4 a -- — • c - — — ——— — ——. - — 1. - Y - : . .,_ 0. 4.--Y. _ ‘e _ 1\ ... t r,, '_._ -- , '- 114-' ' .... . Nur -4i...id— . . 'ThiT . CITY OF RENTON HEARING EXAMINER WILL HOLD A. PUBLIC HEARING IN CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL ON DECEMBER 15, 1992, BEGINNING AT 9:00 AM CONCERNING: ' THE BLUFFS • ECF;R;SA-044-89 , CONTRACT REZONE AND SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF A RESIDENTIAL . CONDOMINIUM COMPLEX CONSISTING OF SIX RESIDENTIAL CONDOMINIUM BUILDINGS. CONTAINING A TOTAL OF 165 DWELLING UNITS, A RECREATION CENTER AND PARKING FOR 368 VEHICLES. THE UNITS ARE SLATED FOR SALE TO MIDDLE TO UPPER INCOME MARKET. THE SITE CONTAINS 22.6 ACRES AND APPROXIMATELY 11.2. ACRES WOULD BE DEVELOPED IN BUILDINGS, '-- ; PARKING, UTILITIES; TRAILS AND DRIVES AND RE-LANDSCAPED OPEN SPACE. APPROXIMATELY 11.4 ACRES OR 51 PERCENT OF THE SITE-WOULD- BE--LEFT AS 'NATURAL OPEN SPACE. RECREATIONAL AMENITIES INCLUDE A RECREATION CENTER, SWIMMING POOL, PEDESTRIAN I WALKWAY SYSTEM, PUBLIC TRAIL AND NATURAL OPEN SPACE.-THE PROPOSAL WOULD I INCORPORATE DESIGN ELEMENTS. SIMILAR TO THE ARCHITECTURE IN GENE COULON PARK, • PROVIDING A SYNERGISTIC RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE COMPLEX AND.THE NEARBY-PARK. THE PROPOSED ENTRANCE DRIVEWAY HAS BEEN REVISED TO PROVIDE 24 FOOT WIDE WITH AN INTERNAL TURNAROUND FOR EMERGENCY VEHICLES. THE REVISED ACCESS PLAN RETAINS THE J SECONDARY EMERGENCY ACCESS ROAD AT THE NORTH END OF THE SITE. GENERAL LOCATION AND/OR ADDRESS: BETWEEN LAKE WASHINGTON BOULEVARD NORTH AND 1-405, EAST OF GENE COULON MEMORIAL BEACH PARK • FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CALL THE CITY OF RENTON DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION 235-2550 DO NOT REMOVE THIS,NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION CERTIFICATION — COPIES OFI, nnaai y1n�,NN►-rI , HEREBY CERTIFY THAT `Tam RE THE ABOVE DOCUMENT WERE POSTED BY ME IN "���� PLACES ON OR NEARBY THE DESCRIBED PROPERTY OY No+�s: ?�2 iqz T�� ('QS-TGK- Wt:-2� Pier �.41 Tft�r.ct GCi2(_,u wN ITG /AL.-so, 50 Cr,t'4" ©r- CYOX. 6 �d�gVIET^S, 1 AT ATTEST: nese •bed and swam to before s. a ��%Q.G �(� #�,Vac:ry vubl t in area ter the state the SIC it ED :o 4�Oa#OySIO'w A Cl ,eaaidi 1 o.A °U l.ODpy A• 0ra. AY or L. oor : a G?,: P';�uc City of Renton 0 ELOPMEN T0N 1NG OEVEcParks and Recreation �'N OF�� OCT 2 91992 MEMORANDUM Fv:-GEIVED DATE: October 29, 1992 TO: Donald Erickson, Principal Planner FROM: William Hutsinpiller, Recreation Services Manager SUBJECT: Bluffs Apartments Per our earlier review and conversation on this subject, it is my understanding that the Bluffs Apartment development will provide for access to accommodate the proposed Pacific Coast Railroad Right-Of-Way Trail System which will parallel 1-405 just above this development. Your assistance in including the above understanding in your written comments relating to this project are appreciated. BH/dlf 92-162df ti CITY OF RENTON emu ' _ BOARD OF PUBLIC WORKS Earl Clymer, Mayor ' October 21, 1992 D V� pA.f��/r - Tl'UF., pCA i Ayaz Colin Quinn 16031 119th Place NE Bothell, WA 98011 SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR VARIANCE FROM PARKING AND LOADING ORDINANCE • (GENERAL PROVISIONS, DRIVEWAY GRADES, ALL OTHER USES) LOCATION: THE BLUFFS CONDOMINIUM COMMUNITY Dear Mr. Quinn: On October 20, 1992 the Board of Public Works reviewed the subject request and approved the variance from the parking and loading ordinance for the two driveway slopes for a maximum of 12% grades. If you have any questions please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, • CL mes C. Hanson /Chairman cc: Don Erickson,/ Clint Morgan Paul Lumbert Jim Chandler JCH363mp 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2569 1 n` BOARD OF PUBLIC WORKS 8:30 a.m. Renton Municipal Building October. 21, 1992. 5th Floor Conference Room IN ATTENDANCE: Jim Hanson, Chairman Jim Gray, Fire Prevention Paul Lumbert, Office Engineer Gregg Zimmerman, Utility Systems Director Paul Forsander, Planner Margaret Puller, Administrative Secretary • VISITORS: Jack Love, Taco Time Greg Deiner, Taco Time Lou Larsen, Taco Time Roy Lewis, The Bluffs Don Bateman, The Bluffs Colin Quinn, The Bluffs MINUTES Facts: The undeveloped rn?rty,is ,w�::��±_���*_nf.Lake Washington Blvd, east of Coulon Park. There are two driveways involved one of which is the main entrance/exit toJthe site. This route is approximately 900 feet in length with variable slopes to a maximum of 12%. The second is an emergency access driveway (north end of the project) which is approximately 1,400 feet in length with variable slopes to a maximum of 12%. : The applicant has designed the two driveways with the least amount of cut and fill to get to and from the site while holding the maximum grades at any given point to 12%. Paul Lumbert reviewed the plan and noted that vehicular access to the subject property is limited and that topographic constraints require grades on the primary access driveway to be a maximum of 12% in places. Additionally, the grade on the limited emergency access road to the north will also be 12% maximum in the worst cases. Colin Quinn gave a brief history of the project which has been in the planning stages for eight to ten years. He noted that it is a difficult site to access. He also pointed out that the project is exempt from the new comp plan requirements provided there is a public hearing held by December 1, 1992. One of the important steps in this tight process is to obtain a deferral from the Board for the driveway slopes. Roy Lewis explained that at any given spot the driveways do not exceed 12% and that there would be very little buildable site or green belt remaining if the driveways were constructed at the required 8% slopes. _ __ Discussion: Discussion followed regarding compliance with ERC conditions including guard rails, slope stability, and erosion control/retention. Mr. Hanson suggested that the three dedicated undeveloped street rights-of-way located in the project must be resolved either by applying for a street vacation or indicating on the application the month and year of the actual street vacation. Mr. Quinn questioned the location of the required public right-of-way improvements on Lake Washington Blvd since a portion of the street can not be improved 1 due to the steep slope condition. Jim Hanson suggested that Mr. Quinn talk with Transportation and Plan Review to resolve the design requirements. MOTION: Moved by ZIMMERMAN, Seconded by GRAY, to follow staff recommendation which is to grant the variance from the parking and loading ordinance (driveway grades) for the Two driveway slopes with a maximum of 1 2% grades. MOTION CARRIED. t% CITY OF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works Department Earl Clymer, Mayor Lynn Guttmann,Administrator October 14, 1992 Mr. Joe Jainga Washington Natural Gas P.O. Box 1869 Seattle, WA 98111 SUBJECT: The Bluffs,A Residential Condominium Community, File No. ECF; R; SA-044-89 Dear Mr.Jainga: Per your request I have enclosed a copy of the proposed site plan for the Bluffs project. If you have any questions or need further assistance, please call me at 277-6167. a. Sincerely, /9Ws. Paul D. Forsander Project Manager attachment: Attachment 1: Bluffs Site Plan 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton. Washington 98055 r-y-rr-r-N —ertif -A )-77P11- ps 4 , (L77717/) 71(77M- ( 1'"' 1147( ?'g W1711 aFj -ae, --'7_.--Zie—#77174:47P (77-01 ) -7> 'TY Ae77. A7p-)47Lj • C.),7 77W2r -AWL Z3 /2(77 -7 aeir E -4'77 - 77-014--71:0 -22/-€7 (c-P*7-0 7y4 4', eje g c"-)1/ "ePti.r7/7 'D-6/ 01 , ? ° egyie cJDA/faie5- '?at "r?" 1-Pirr • ( r777 -r-y74,74-7,707--tp-i-f,- / f—e , • —re3 e2/ • • • --?To v-7, 7r), -7 -7-fp 'cl'`jr71 • AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION Karen Tucker , being first duly sworn on oath states that he/she is the Chief Clerk of the VALLEY DAILY NEWS Daily newspapers published six (6) times a week. That said newspapers are legal newspapers and are now and have been for more than six months prior to the date of publication referred to, printed and published in the English language continually as daily newspapers in Kent, King County, Washington. The Valley Daily News has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for King County. The notice in the exact form attached, was published in the Valley Daily News (and not in supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its _ - _ subscribers during the below stated period. The annexed notice a Notice of Issuance CITYORENTON,;; NOTICE OF ISSUANCE/AVAILABILITY OF ADDENDUM TO THE FEIS,MITIGATION was published on 1 0—9—9 2 SEPA DOCUMENTAPP AND AL Notice is given under SEPA, RCW 43.21C.075 and WAC 197-11-660, that the. to The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum City Finalo R Environmentalnton has issued an Addendum nt 4 9. 7 5 g g g the Impact Statement of$ and a Mitigation Document for The Bluffs. Copies of these documents are available at the public information counter(SEPA Infor- "flrIA_O An, a( I mation Center)in the Development Services y� Division, Third Floor, Renton Municipal, Building located at 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton,Washington 98055.Reading copies Subscribed and sworn before me thi 1 6 th day of 0 c t 19 9 2 are available in the Renton Municipal Library at the above address. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: THE BLUFFS ECF;R;SA-044-89 Contract Rezone and Site Plan Approval of a 22.6 acre site from R-1 Residential to the Notary Public for the State of Washington R-3 Residential designation and the con- residing at Kent struction of a 165 unit residential condo- King County, Washington minium complex on a site in the northern, portion of the City of Renton. voN asp Revised 8/91 Any interested party may appeal these conditions in writing by 5:00 p.m., October 29, 1992.Any appeal as to the adequacy of the FEIS must also be filed by 5:00 p.m., October 29, 1992. See City Code Section 4-8-11, WAC 197-11-680 for further details and RCW 43.21 C.075. You should be prepared to make specific factual objections. Contact City of Renton, Development Services Division, to read or ask about the procedures for SEPA appeals. Published in the Valley Daily News Octo- ber 9, 1992.8116 CITY OF RENTON NOTICE OF ISSUANCE/AVAILABILITY OF ADDENDUM TO THE FEIS, MITIGATION DOCUMENT AND SEPA APPEAL Notice is given under SEPA, RCW 43.21 C.075 and WAC 197-11-660, that the City of Renton has issued an Addendum to the Final Environmental Impact Statement and a Mitigation Document for The Bluffs. Copies of these documents are available at the public information counter (SEPA Information Center) in the Development Services Division, Third Floor, Renton Municipal Building located at 200 Mill Avenue . South, Renton, Washington 98055. Reading copies are available in the Renton Municipal Library at the • above address. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: THE BLUFFS ECF;R;SA-044-89 Contract Rezone and Site Plan Approval of a 22.6 acre site from R-1 Residential to the R-3 Residential designation and the construction of a 165 unit residential condominium complex on a site in the northern portion of the City of Renton. Any interested party may appeal these conditions in writing by 5:00 p.m., October 29, 1992. Any appeal as to the adequacy of the FEIS must also be filed by 5:00 p.m., October 29, 1992. See City Code Section 4-8-11, WAC 197-11-680 for further details and RCW 43.21 C.075. You should be prepared to make specific factual objections. Contact City of Renton, Development Services Division,to read or ask about the procedures for SEPA appeals. Publication Date: October 9, 1992 .', • Account No. 51067 • • combpub CITY OF RENTON NOTICE OF ADDENDUM ISSUANCE Description of Agency Action: Environmental Review Committee (ERC) issued an addendum to the Final Environmental Impact Statement on October 9, 1992, on The Bluffs. ERC also issued concurrently with the same document, mitigation measures on the above project based on information from the DEIS, FEIS and addendum. Description of Proposal: Contract Rezone and Site Plan Approval of a 22.6 acre site from R-1 Residential to the R-3 Residential designation and the construction of a 165 unit residential condominium complex on a site in the northern portion of the City of Renton. Location of Proposal: Between Lake Washington Boulevard North and 1-405, east of Gene Coulon Memorial Beach Park Type of SEPA Review: Addendum to the FEIS and Mitigation Measures amending The Bluffs Mitigation Document and FEIS. Lead Agency: City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Development Planning Section PUBLICATION DATE: October 9, 1992 DATE OF DECISION: October 7, 1992 SIGNATURES: G - Tee / ? -7 A. Guttmann, Administrator DATE apartment of Planning/Building/Public Works Za‘Lk et ,g9z . Sam Chastain, Administrator DATE 0 Community Service Department 0 /6 - 7 1 Lee ler, Fire Chief DATE Renton Fire Department . mitsig �% CITY OF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works Department Earl Clymer, Mayor Lynn Guttmann,Administrator • October 9, 1992 SUBJECT: Addendum to Environmental Impact Statement for The Bluffs ECF;R;SA-044-89 Dear Interested Party: Transmitted herewith is a copy of an Addendum to Environmental Impact Statement for The Bluffs, a residential condominium community. The project site is located between Lake Washington Boulevard North and 1-405, east of Gene Coulon Memorial Beach Park. PROPOSAL: The applicant has requested Contract Rezone and Site Plan Approval to allow construction of a residential condominium complex consisting of six residential condominium buildings containing a total of 165 dwelling units, a recreation center and parking for 368 vehicles. The units are slated for sale to middle to upper income market. The site contains 22.6 acres and approximately 11.2. acres would be developed in buildings, parking, drives and re-landscaped open space. Approximately 11.4 acres or 51 percent of the site would be left as natural open space. Recreational amenities include a recreation center, swimming pool, pedestrian walkway system, public trail and natural open space. The proposal would incorporate design elements similar to the .. architecture in Gene Coulon Park, providing a synergistic relationship between the complex and the nearby park. The proposed entrance driveway has been revised to provide 24 foot wide with an internal turnaround for emergency vehicles. The revised access plan retains the secondary emergency access road at the north end of the site. This addendum is being provided for your information. If you have any further questions, please call Paul Forsander or me at 235-2550. erely, Donald K. Erickson, AICP Secretary to the ERC adcovitr Inn Mill Avenrle Snuth - Renton_ Washington 98055 CIT 7F RENTON ems"LL Planning/Building/Public Works Department Earl Clymer, Mayor Lynn Guttmann,Administrator October 9, 1992 SUBJECT: Addendum to Environmental Impact Statement for The Bluffs ECF;R;SA-044-89 Dear Interested Party: Transmitted herewith is a copy of an Addendum to Environmental Impact Statement for The Bluffs, a residential condominium community. The project site is located between Lake Washington Boulevard North and 1-405, east of Gene Coulon Memorial Beach Park. PROPOSAL: The applicant has requested Contract Rezone and Site Plan Approval to allow construction of a residential condominium complex consisting of six residential condominium buildings containing a total of 165 dwelling units, a recreation center and parking for 368 vehicles. The units are slated for sale to middle to upper income market. The site contains 22.6 acres and approximately 11.2. acres would be developed in buildings, parking, drives and re-landscaped open space. Approximately 11.4 acres or 51 percent of the site would be left as natural open space. Recreational amenities include a recreation center, swimming pool, pedestrian walkway system, public trail and natural open space. The proposal would incorporate design elements similar to the architecture in Gene Coulon Park, providing a synergistic relationship between the complex and the nearby park. The proposed entrance driveway has been revised to provide 24 foot wide with an internal turnaround for emergency vehicles. The revised access plan retains the secondary emergency access road at the north end of the site. This addendum is being provided for your information. If you have any further questions, please call Paul Forsander or me at 235-2550. erely, Donald K. Erickson, AICP Secretary to the ERC adcovltr 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 CITY )F RENTON • "LL -„, Planning/Building/Public Works Department Earl Clymer, Mayor Lynn Guttmann,Administrator October 9, 1992 SUBJECT: The Bluffs ECF;R;SA-044-89 Dear Interested Party: This is to inform you that, under SEPA, RCW 43.21C.075 and WAC 197-11-660, the City of Renton has issued a mitigation document for The Bluffs Environmental Impact Statement. Copies of the document are available at the public information counter (SEPA Information Center) in the Development Services Division, Third Floor, Renton Municipal Building located at 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, Washington 98055. Reading copies are available in the Renton Municipal Library at the above address. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: THE BLUFFS ECF;R;SA-044-89 The applicant has requested Contract Rezone and Site Plan Approval to allow construction of a residential condominium complex consisting of six residential condominium buildings containing a total of 165 dwelling units, a recreation center and parking for 368 vehicles. The units are slated for sale to middle to upper income market. The site contains 22.6 acres and approximately 11.2. acres would be developed in buildings, parking, drives and re-landscaped open space. Approximately 11.4 acres or 51 percent of the site would be left as natural open space. Recreational amenities include a recreation center, swimming pool, pedestrian walkway system, public trail and natural open space. The proposal would incorporate design elements similar to the architecture in Gene Coulon Park, providing a synergistic relationship between the complex and the nearby park. The proposed entrance driveway has been revised to provide 24 foot wide with an internal turnaround for emergency vehicles. The revised access plan retains the secondary emergency access road at the north end of the site. Any interested party may appeal these conditions in writing by 5:00 p.m., October 29, 1992. See City Code Section 4-8- 11,WAC 197-11-680 for further details and RCW 43.21C.075. Any appeal as to the adequacy of the FEIS must be filed with the Hearing Examiner within twenty (20) days of the date the decision was made to issue the mitigation document. All appeals must be received by October 29, 1992, 5:00 p.m. You should be prepared to make specific factual objections to either the mitigation document and/or the FEIS. If you have any questions about either document or the procedures for either appeal, please contact Paul Forsander at 235-2550. • rely, Donald K. Erickson, AICP Secretary to the ERC combltr 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 CITY JF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works Department Earl Clymer, Mayor Lynn Guttmann,Administrator October 9, 1992 Mr. Colin Quinn Quinn-Webb &Assoc Inc 16031 - 119th PI NE Bothell, WA 98011 SUBJECT: The Bluffs ECF;R;SA-044-89 Dear M uinn: Attached herein is a copy of the mitigation measures that were adopted by the Environmental Review Committee at its regular meeting on October 7, 1992. These measures will apply to all proposed development actions identified in the Draft and Final EIS and the Addendum to the FEIS. The measures will apply to the first permit, ostensibly a Special Permit for Fill and Grade, and will continue to be applied with all subsequent permits. This mitigation document is an appealable action. Appeals should be filed with the City of Renton Hearing Examiner by October 29, 1992, 5:00 p.m. If you have any questions about these mitigation measures or the appeal process, please contact Paul Forsander, Project Manager or me at 235-2550. Donald K. Erickson, AICP Secretary to the ERC cc: Washington State Department of Ecology Environmental Review Section Mail Stop PV-11 Olympia, WA 98504 ISSULTR 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 CITY OF RENTON NOTICE OF ADDENDUM ISSUANCE Description of Agency Action: Environmental Review Committee (ERC) issued an addendum to the Final Environmental Impact Statement on October 9, 1992, on The Bluffs. ERC also issued concurrently with the same document, mitigation measures on the above project based on information from the DEIS, FEIS and addendum. Description of Proposal: Contract Rezone and Site Plan Approval of a 22.6 acre site from R-1 Residential to the R-3 Residential designation and the construction of a 165 unit residential condominium complex on a site in the northern portion of the City of Renton. Location of Proposal: Between Lake Washington Boulevard North and 1-405, east of Gene Coulon Memorial Beach Park Type of SEPA Review: Addendum to the FEIS and Mitigation Measures amending The Bluffs Mitigation Document and FEIS. Lead Agency: City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Development Planning Section PUBLICATION DATE: October 9, 1992 DATE OF DECISION: October 7, 1992 SIGNATURES: A. Guttmann, Administrator DATE apartment of Planning/Building/Public Works 7ed /99z_ Sam Chastain, Administrator DATE Community Service Department 2%/...">) /0 - Lee ler, Fire Chief DATE Renton Fire Department mitsig - f ' Y . CITY OF RENTON ' NOTICE OF ISSUANCE/AVAILABILITY OF ADDENDUM TO THE FEIS, MITIGATION DOCUMENT AND SEPA APPEAL Notice is given under SEPA, RCW 43.21 C.075 and WAC 197-11-660, that the City of Renton has issued an Addendum to the Final Environmental Impact Statement and a Mitigation Document for The Bluffs. Copies of these documents are available at the public information counter (SEPA Information Center) in the Development Services Division, Third Floor, Renton Municipal Building,located at 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, Washington 98055. Reading copies are available in the Renton Municipal Library at the above address. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: THE BLUFFS ECF;R;SA-044-89 Contract Rezone and Site Plan Approval of a 22.6 acre site from R-1 Residential to the R-3 Residential designation and the construction of a 165 unit residential condominium complex on a site in the northern portion of the City of Renton. Any interested party may appeal these conditions in writing by 5:00 p.m., October 29, 1992. Any appeal as to the adequacy of the FEIS must also be filed by 5:00 p.m., October 29, 1992. See City Code Section 4-8-11, WAC 197-11-680 for further details and RCW 43.21 C.075. You should be prepared to make specific factual objections. Contact City of Renton, Development Services Division, to read or ask about the procedures for SEPA appeals. Publication Date: October 9, 1992 Account No. 51067 combpub • • . tr- \:CtrAiyell t:Z-. 49 if rtr'%3:-• /...... . >44 iii:VAL l l• ,'•....y • r' C7 lf:: G. } :ri Y4r2?:Yj .`fi+s4. '( I �'�,ti ' ,�rt i`.:x ;::: 1.A-'a°asf I.iYt.`.si1 ',�',�,i.r t IX CC Q /71 ALT-If..'7/?'..'.7:!1:— .:1,1'.4.'".,t/ ' --:-. .12,t4i,...t • 0 :-.7:7" P1,1r, i , , A4.14 , : :7.,,,,,I.• • ,14,-4,12 i elf04 I:1.....i. 1 i ijijii:.'1�y II �1 _iwt IN#A j«a,.r y .�11tI 13�r." ,,,.../............__<„ --\\ :a 1 7�Slr�. z g co 0 W 1 , ;1 T i.( C`q./}pay P:F- A 'S. a..'�.''.'•1!� s"�'.:���v t Y !Y�x j,�Iy ' ` s ?l hr1:1 ... it) U) >. 0 i J Ja Jt, ' 11 • ��{ i 11 !) �� W ll,` ,ri\pv.,.,„,Z r t c ; k •... 1 .14. 1.___Zt. > ‘,.._.:5,,-----.•.-N-4`q*7 it.' rtvft\ 1 jac•41 t.\ •.'• /f.' "aft I-- W tc.- CI „kff!,c4f,sstillf,•(,(.11‘;,, 11,1 1 ,i \1.. ., ; (. ILLJ , or- 0 ,,:, ci *A te' 1 It i 'a" �. . •Uki' \J { y ADDENDUM to the Final Environmental Impact Statement for THE BLUFFS, A Residential Condominium Community The Environmental Review Committee for the City of Renton issued a Final Impact Statement for The Bluffs Apartments, on February 25, 1991. The Notice of FEIS Availability and Time Extension of Appeal Period was published on March 18, 1991. [Note: Issuance of the Mitigation Document, which is the City's decision document was not prepared at that time, thus delaying the SEPA appeal period.] On October 9, 1992, the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) issued an Addendum to the Final EIS to recognize and assess the environmental impacts of recent changes in the proposed action. The ERC determined that an addendum was appropriate because the changes in the proposal did not substantially change the impacts or alternatives discussed in the FEIS. Under WAC197-11-600 (4) c., an addendum "adds analyses or information about a proposal but does not substantially change the analysis of significant impacts and alternatives in the existing document." The Addendum included two changes to the proposed land use action (a contract rezone with site plan approval), modifications to the proposed access driveway design, and a change in the marketing of the project from rental apartments to owner-occupied condominiums. All other aspects of the revised proposal remain as originally proposed. Original Proposal The original proposed action, as described in the FEIS,was for a rezone from the existing R-1 designation to the R-2 zone (low to medium density) residential designation, together with development of a planned unit development (PUD) of an apartment complex with six apartment buildings containing a total of 165 dwelling units, a recreation center and parking for 368 vehicles. The units are slated for a middle to upper income market. The site contains 22.6 acres and approximately 11.2. acres would be developed in buildings, parking, drives and re-landscaped open space. Approximately 11.4 acres or 51 percent of the site would be left as natural open space. Recreational amenities include a recreation center, swimming pool, pedestrian walkway system, public trail and natural open space. The proposal would incorporate design elements similar to the architecture in Gene Coulon Park, providing a synergistic relationship between the complex and the nearby park. A PUD process will allow the City to include design and environmental measures as a permanent part of the permit. Retention of existing open space and treed areas will protect the environmentally sensitive areas and provide an aesthetically pleasing backdrop for users of Gene Coulon Park. Summary of Revised Proposal The applicant has requested Contract Rezone and Site Plan Approval to allow construction of a residential condominium complex consisting of six residential condominium buildings containing a total of 165 dwelling units, a recreation center and parking for 368 vehicles. The units are slated for sale to middle to upper income market. The site contains 22.6 acres and approximately 11.2. acres would be developed in buildings, parking, drives and re-landscaped open space. Approximately 11.4 acres or 51 percent of the site would be left as natural open space. Recreational amenities include a recreation center, swimming pool, pedestrian walkway system, public trail and natural open space.The proposal would incorporate design elements similar to the architecture in Gene Coulon Park, providing a synergistic relationship between the complex and the nearby park. The proposed entrance driveway has been revised to provide 24 foot wide with an internal turnaround for emergency vehicles. The revised access plan retains the secondary emergency access road at the north end of the site. ' THE BLUFFS ADDENDUM TO THE EIS - DATE OF ISSUANCE: OCTOBER 9,1992 PAGE 3 Contract Rezone The revised proposal is for a Contract Rezone from the existing R-1 designation to the R-3 zone (medium density) residential designation. Under the proposed Contract Rezone, overall project density would be limited to less than the original R-2 designation density of ten (10) dwelling units per acre. Overall proposed project density would be approximately 7.3 dwelling units per acre. The Contract Rezone is required under City Council Resolution 2911, for ten projects, including this proposal, which Council exempted from the" rezone moratorium"while the Comprehensive Plan is being updated. Site Plan Approval The revised proposal includes Site Plan Approval in lieu of the originally proposed Planned Unit Development (PUD). From a land use standpoint, the Site Plan Ordinance would provide the same type of protections for the environment and public interest that were afforded under the PUD Ordinance. For example, the Site Plan Ordinance gives the City authority to impose site planning and design conditions, as well as, environmental measures as a permanent part of the permit. Under Site Plan Approval the City also has the authority to impose conditions requiring retention of existing open space and treed areas will protect the environmentally sensitive areas and provide an aesthetically pleasing backdrop for users of Gene Coulon Park. Modifications to Driveway Access The proposal originally included a main entrance driveway consisting of two twenty (20) foot wide lanes for in and out traffic, as well as, an emergency access road • at the north end of the site. The purpose of the two extra wide lanes was to allow for each lane to serve for emergency access, should the other lane be blocked. Because of the extensive grading and retaining wall construction required for this type of roadway,the applicant requested the Fire Marshal to review the emergency access plan for the proposal. The Fire Marshall has approved a revised 24 foot wide ' entrance drive with an internal turnaround for emergency vehicles. The revised access plan retains the secondary emergency access road at the north end of the site. CITY OF RENTON MEMORANDUM DATE: October 2, 1992 TO: Paul Forsander FROM: Clin (2 It SUBJECT: MITIGATION DOCUMENT DRAFT/ THE BLUFF APARTMENTS Item 3 B10 (Recommended Mitigation Measures) section wording may be miss leading which says "None are considered necessary." The city code does require the Development to provide for roadway improvements on Lake Washington Blvd. This will include curb, gutter, sidewalks, street lighting and 'roadway widening with storm drainage consideration. However, these improvement may be deferred upon application to the Board of Public Works. Reason for a deferral is that the Transportation Division is working on the future roadway configuration and alignment which may changes. Section B8 of your proposed revision should read as follows: B8. Off-Site Improvement: Certain off site improvements are required per code and are a condition of this Contract Rezone/Site Plan Approval. The applicant will be required to construct the following off-site improvements on Lake Washington Blvd., but not limited to (e.g. curbs, gutters, lane widening, storm drainage, street lighting etc.). However, due to potential roadway configuration and alignment changes to Lake Washington Blvd. the applicant may make applicatdion to the Board of Public Works for deferral of the above referenced off-site improvements. Conditions of a deferral would be set by the Board of Public Works. 92CEM129 rr'ug AOUnu All , oltu lOn AlLIn ,111,111OU11/ --Al't.. U+, LVI ,.i ) _• �_ r Control Aya^cy Boundary review Board PO cox 1105C T 116 Union St, Ste 500 • 3600 - 13oth P1 SE Seattle, WA 98111 ��� Seattle, 4A 08101-2Q33 Bellevue, WA 9800o-1400 DsviO xortz Ouwa•,isn Tribal Office Jerry Opatz Qhd Ark- - Dept of Natural Resources 15610 - 1st Ave S 1 U.S.c.P.A. • 1100 Olive 'Way. W1450 Seattle, WA 98148 1200 - 6th Ave, M/S WD-136 14rOor Seattle, WA 98101 Seattle, WA 98101 b ' Journal American King County King County �OIZI� 1705 - 132nd Ave NE Dept of Public Works Dept of Public Works l 20 Bellevue, WA 98005 • Solid Waste Division Surface Water Momt Div 400 Yesler Way, Room 600 400 Yesler Way, Room 400 Seattle, WA .98104-2637 Seattle, WA 98104-2637 City of Kent King County Resource Planning EIS Review Coordinator - Planning Department ATTN: Laura Kayl • King County Courthouse 220 - 4th Ave S 3600 - 136th P1 SE Room 400 Kent, WA 98032-5395 Bellevue, WA 98006-1400 510 Third Ave • Seattle, WA 98104 Kin,: County King County Public Library King County Soil Conservation Planning Division ATTN: Susie Wheeler ATTN: Jack Davis 7th Floor, Smith Tower 300 - 8th Ave N 935 Powell Ave SW Seattle, WA 98104 Seattle, WA 98109 Renton, WA 98055 King 'County Parks A Planning D. L. Lensegrav Darlene Madenwald ATTFI: Erik Stockdale Puget Sound Power & Light Wa Environmental Council 110E Smitn Tower PO Sox 329 5200 University Way NE, 4201 506 -econd Ave Renton, WA 98057-0329 Seattle, WA 98105 Seattle, WA 95104 • MA}'Qoo ? .We►1akum METRO Rod Malcom, Fisheries • Pacific Northwest Bell Environmental Planning Div Mucklesnoot Indian Tribe ATTN: Harry Kluges 821 Secono uve, M/S 63 39015 - 172nd Ave SE 1600 - 7th Ave, Rm 1513 Seattle, 4A 96104 • Auburn, WA 98002 Seattle, WA 98191 &~el 6 1...s h Puget Sound Council Puget Sound Power & Light Co Puget Sound Water Quality of Government ATTN: EIS Review Authority 126 First Ave S South Central Div Office Abbot Raphael hall Seattle, WA 98104 620 S Grady WayMail Stop PV-15 Renton, WA 98055 Olympia, WA 98504-0900 Greater Renton Chamber of Renton School Dist 4403 City Attorney Commerce 435 Main Ave S 300 Rainier N Renton, WA' 98055 Renton, WA 98055 • City Council Fire Department Hearing Examiner's Office Renton Public Library Renton Public Library Mayor Highlands Branch (2) Main Branch (3) ATTN: Mayor's Assistant • Parks board (1) Parks S Recreation Dept Planning Commission Police Department Public Works Department SEPA Information .Center 1 IC h Soak..a �- - 11-- yy'' Seattle-King County Seattle Post-Intelligencer Seattle Times-Eastside Edition A_K. N Jept of Public health Business Mews • Business News �s� 400 Tesler Bldg 101 Elliott Ave W PD Box 70 �� '^""���Seattle, WA ?5101 Seattle, WA 98111 Seattle, WA QE111 Su,1k loI Real Property Services SEPA Register (...2..., State Department of Ecology ._• Seattle Water Dept. WA ST DOE \(/ Environmental Review Section 710 - 2nd Ave, 11th Floor Environmental Review M/S PV-11 Seattle, WA 98104-1712 I PO Box 47703, PV-11 Olympia, WA 93504 Olympia, WA 98504-7703 _ 1 State Department of Ecology State Department of Ecology James Lutz •- Attn: EIS Review ATTN: Permit Coordinator WSDOT, Dist. #1 " Northwest Regional Office Shorelands 15700 Dayton Ave N 3190 - 16Jth Ave SE M/S PV-11 PD Box 330310, M/S 138 Bellevue, WA 980.08-5452 Olympia, WA 98504 Seattle, WA 93133-9710 - La.W5i -----AAA Doc.4 Addehdiiw‘ • Jerry Scnutz • 'ayl_'f:, ,l twAn, Habitat ?fgmt State Dept of Game WSDOT, District 1 WA Dept of Fisheries 600 N Capital Way, M/S GJ-11 15700 Dayton Ave N 22510 SE g4tn P1, 4E240 Olympia', WA 98504 PO Box 330310 Issaquah, WA 98027 :-,..1,,. QA1;,-9711 _ _ • *Yxxxxx***x***xxx*xx*xxxx*xx**xxJ7 kh**xx**x*xx*x*********xxxx*x****x*)itxx*x*xx*x .. �l *****x xx***x*** ******** *******xI• t*****x*** ****x******* x C ***** * ****Y1* .' ***** r. "31--r Ts a Reco , • . sett7" AM 'pc Avatlalo , 1c�'1 ern 1 SevC� , WN1 _ ,:ly Aliment Graham Bell Cindy Smith 0 /e2421 Meadow N 307 N 33rd 1733 Jones Ave NE 19 Renton, WA 9805o Renton, WA 98055 t • Renton, WA 93056 l'ichael -lannis, Atty Ida Wooden George Spencer n;•nnis 6 Olsen 3901 Park Ave N 1809 Jones Ave NE _.1 3900 E Valley Hwy, Ste 203 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 93056 Renton, WA 93055 , Cnalmar H: Bolen I Angela I tagliorf Stuart Dooley 2712 Meadow Ave N 2100 Lk Wash Blvd N, Sp 32 2003 NE 16th ' Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 9805o •J • Ralph Evsns Mary Jo L.E. Graves Darrell Igelmund, President ' - 3306 NE 11th P1 905 N 28th P1 N Renton/Kennydale --) I Renton, WA 9305o Renton, WA 98056 Neighborhood Defense Fund 3602 Lk Washington Siva N Renton, WA 93056 Joan N. Jensen Leslie Lloyd Angela Mohr 2721 N.adow Ave N The Ferris Company' 2100 Lk Wash Blvd N, 492 Renton, WA 98056" 10o55 NE 4th, Suite 506 Renton, WA 98056 • Bellevue, WA 98004 • John Phillips Colin Quinn David T. Sager •- Phillips ' Wilson Quinn-Webb e, Assoc Inc 1025 N 28th P1 "' 2001 Western Ave, 4500 16031 - 119th P1 NE Renton, WA 9805o Seattle, WA 93121 Bothell, WA 98011 • Edward Scheiner Helen Shook Darryl Smith - 3312 Lk Wash Blvd N 1405 V 24th 1733 Jonas Ave NE w Renton, WA 980:6 Renton, WA 9805o Renton, WA 98056 Joanne Stewart Tina iilding 1 Versie Vaupel 3233 Mt Ave N Valley Daily News PO Sox 755 Renton, 'W4 9805o PO Box 10 Renton, WA 98057 Kent, WA 98032 i Rich Wagner Mr. A Mrs. Glen Yargen • 1321 S 7tn St 703 N 29th Renton, WA 98055 Renton, WA 98056 ' , = .. f . . 0 r ' „'•' aL, • • • C_ :''., 1 .- rr. .•f . • Carol Thompson City of Tukwila METRO, Market Dev Div Planning & Bldg Dept OtPerman 321 Second Ave. o-t/S 64 6200 Southcenter Blvd 'pt of Wildlife Seattle. WA 90104-1595 Tukwila. WA 98188 3 Mill Creek Blvd • Mill Creek, WA 93012 M't" D o c c 4reicitird c4 W\ ; , U.S. ,:rmy Corps of Engineers U.S. Dept of Agriculture Seattle District Office Soil Conservation Office U.S. Department of HUD cng.. Div. - Planning Renton Field Office Arch: Pl. aiBldgura .� PO Box C-2755 Arcade Plaza Bldg 935 Powell SW Seattle, '. Seattle A 95124 Renton, WA 98055 al Second. Ave Se . WA 98101 J • U.S. Crept of Transportation Richard H. Watson. Dir. Jepartmen't of Highways Washington St Energy Ofc 809 Legion Way SE, M/S FA-11 'DennisUnie ityno CAUP J e331 :orson Ave S Olympia, WA 98504-1211 University of Washington4 . Seattle. 1;A 98108 Seattle,Gould Hall, UD-o0 WA 98195 J Valley Daily News Valley Medical Center ATTN: Dean 4. Radford 400 S 43rd St 815hMerce Natural Gas Co S PS fox 10 Renton, WA 980555 Mercer -1Kent, mA • 032 Seattle, WA 98111 9 J • ,J • • • • fx*zxx*xx**xx*xx*x**It**xxz*zx*xx:. 5x*xxxz** xx *x •, *xx*1i**xx**' zx*********,, z******** J • ****x******xx*xx***x*********xx*I ***********x**********************, t***x***** RUN0001. J FILE RUN00'11 IN L1 3RARY ACD2PR.T ON VOLUME SYS111 1 :56:37 PM OCTOBER 5. 1792 33 LINES 1 ( 3PY AY IICFR "7 (aT WnRxcrarrr1N 117) 'J • • • • - • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 1h.' • sv •. • • .... ,:` i q,, ,il.M 1 ,Safes ';r'., ,: ' .+;f .. /'Il''i '.i:,i•',(.,tF�4y 'rt 1.ut4i:'r.. AHD f.-'i':I" • .!%•pie i'4:--:^.:� :..� ,1.E V.; CITY OF RENTON NOTICE OF AVAILABILITY MITIGATION DOCUMENT APPLICATION NO(S): ECF;R;SA-044-89 APPLICANT: Lincoln Property Company PROJECT NAME: The Bluffs DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Contract Rezone and Site Plan Approval of a 22.6 acre site from R-1 Residential to the R-3 Residential designation and the construction of a 165 unit residential condominium complex on a site in the northern portion of the City of Renton. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Between Lake Washington Boulevard North and 1-405, east of Gene Coulon Memorial Beach Park LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Development Planning Section The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee, under WAC 197-11-660, has issued a mitigation document to address the environmental impacts expected from the potential development of The Bluffs. An environmental impact statement was required for this project under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c) and other documents cited in the ordinance. The impacts described in that statements and the subsequent Addendum are the basis for the mitigating measures in the mitigation document. This decision was made by the Environmental Review Committee after review of the completed environmental impact statement and Addendum and other information on file with the lead agency. Any interested party may appeal these conditions in writing by 5:00 p.m., October 29, 1992, to the Renton Hearing Examiner. Any appeal as to the adequacy of the FEIS and/or the Addendum to the FEIS must also be filed by 5:00 p.m., October 29, 1992. See City Code Section 4-8-11, WAC 197-11-680 for further details and RCW 43.21 C.075. You should be prepared to make specific factual objections. Contact City of Renton, Community Development Department to read or ask about the procedures for SEPA appeals. Responsible Official: Environmental Review Committee c/o Don Erickson, Secretary Development Planning Section Department of Planning/Building/Public Works 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 PUBLICATION DATE: October 9, 1992 DATE OF DECISION: October 7, 1992 SIGNATURES: /O '2 Ly A. Guttmann, Administrator DATE artment of Planning/Building/Public Works ' ©d /99z Sam Chastain, Administrator DATE Community Service Department /o_ 7^ Y7--- /Lee er,Fire Chief �� DATE Re ire Department mitdcsig Professional Management of Multi-Family and Commercial .�. Land Planning and Development Quinn-Webb & Assoc. Inc. 16031 -119th PI. N.E. BOTHELL,WASHINGTON 98011 362-2728 Fax 488-2162 September 8, 1992 PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF RENTON Mr. Paul D. Forsander City of Renton SEP 1 01992 Planning Department 200 Mill Avenue S. ytt.;tiviED Renton, Washington 98055 Re: The Bluffs Rezone and Site Plan Approval R-044-89 Dear Paul: Thank you for meeting with Don Bateman and me on September 8, 1992 . We are encouraged by your willingness to work with us to establish an expedient review process. • We hereby authorize the City to proceed with the preparation of the mitigation document based on The Bluffs EIS. We are in the process of revising our rezone application forms and anticipate having the requested information to you as soon as possible. Sincerely, QUINN - WEBB & ASSOCIATES, INC. (24_,Je.L__. C43 Colin Quinn President A , cc: Don Bateman Professional Management of Multi-Family and Commercial Land Planning and Development Quinn-Webb & Assoc. Inc. 16031 - 119th PI. N.E. BOTHELL,WASHINGTON 98011 362-2728 Fax 488-2162 September 8, 1992 PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF RENTON Mr. Paul D. Forsander City of Renton SEP 1 0.1992 Planning Department 200 Mill Avenue S. t.att,;LIVED Renton, Washington 98055 t� Re: The Bluffs Rezone and Site Plan Approval R-044-89 Dear Paul: Thank you for meeting with Don Bateman and me on September 8, 1992 . We are encouraged by your willingness to work with us to establish an expedient review process. We hereby authorize the City to proceed with the preparation of the mitigation document based on The Bluffs EIS. We are in the process of revising our rezone application forms and anticipate having the requested information to you as soon as possible. Sincerely, QUINN - WEBB & ASSOCIATES, INC. Colin Quinn President cc: Don Bateman Donald S. Bateman, Broker i D • s• B 12121 N.E. Northup Way, Suite 215, Bellevue,WA 98005 (206)453-4004 August 17, 1992 . • PLANNING QIVISION CIT(OF REMTOf'! City CouncilAUG � : City of Renton AU ,vim Municipal Building -1 4,-T-1 Renton, Washington 98055 -is-- RE: Renton Comprehensive Plan _ Revised Land Use Concept Draft August 7, 1992 Dear Council Members: We are the owners of a 24. 5 acre property (see attachment) located between Lake Washington Boulevard North and I-405, east of Coulon Memorial Park. We have been actively pursuing the necessary approvals to utilize our property for multi—family residential uses for over ten years. We originally filed an applica— tion for rezone and PUD approval in 1984. • In 1989 we revised our proposal to reflect current market and financial conditions. The current proposal is a 165 unit condominium community named The Bluffs. In March 1991 a Final EIS for the Bluffs was issued by the City of Renton. This en— tailed an analysis of a rezone from the existing R1 zone to R2 and a PUD to allow cluster development of the property. We currently have a pending rezone application to change the existing R1 zone to R2, in order to allow construction of the proposed "Bluffs" community. The project • being proposed is to be built at an overall density of 6. 7 units per acre. Approxi— mately 83% of the site, or 20.4 acres, will be retained as native and landscaped open space. This type of cluster development has far less impact on the property than conventional single family lot development. We believe that utilizing this property, which is centrally located near urban services and employment centers, to provide high quality housing meets the Growth Management Act criteria and the public need for housing. The property allows the creation of a new community and additional housing stock in an area that will not abut existing neighborhoods. The current revised land use concept dated August 7, 1992, designates our property ill) as single family residential 8 D.U./Ac. While this designation allows up to 8 D.U./ Ac. , it states that "accessory apartments would be allowed subject to strict con— ditions". We are concerned, as property owners, that although our proposal is be— low the proposed density allowance and we are proposing for sale housing and not capartments, that the single family residential 8 D.U./Ac. zone will not accommo— date our proposal . Renton City Council August 17, 1992 o . Page Two Having been involved in numerous development proposals for this property over the last ten years, the one thing that is consistently obvious is that a conventional subdivision of the property does not work. The best way- to protect the natural features of the property, reduce traffic and provide quality housing is clustered development. Therefore, we request that the Renton City Council designate this property as a futfre study area so reasonable alternatives to a single family subdivision can be examined. ,. We believe that through a contract rezone and site plan approval process adequate conditions and mitigations can be established to both protect the integrity of the property, ensure minimal impacts to the neighborhood and provide a quality for sale housing community. This cluster development approach as articulated in The Bluffs EIS will be a far superior land use than what might result under a conventional subdivision. Thapk you for your consideration of this matter. Si P rely, . ,0 • de ,ki,, Donald S. Bateman Copy: Don Erickson, Planning Department l DSB/kn 1 i -• I AP CATION FOR ACTION ITEMS CITY OF RENTON BOARD OF PUBLIC WORKS RETURN NO LATER THAN NOON WED. ACTION ITEMS TO BE HEARD 2 WEEKS FROM THAT DATE HEARING EXAMINER # DATE OF FILING: BUILDING PERMIT # • DATE OF HEARING: OWNER: COOKE — GLADSJO — SEGUR — KIRKMAN — MATSUOKA APPLICANT: LINCOLN PROPERTY COMPANY, N.C. INC. BUSINESS ADDRESS: 1745 — 114TH AVE. SE 98004 455-4813 BELLEVUE, WA ZIP CODE TELEPHONE HOME ADDRESS: ZIP'CODE TELEPHONE DEVELOPER NAME: LINCOLN PROPERTY CO. CONTRACTOR NAME: LINCON NORTHWEST, INC. ADDRESS PROPERTY INVOLVED: UNDEVELOPED—EAST OF LAKE WASHINGTON BLVD. ACROSS FROM COULON PARK LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT BLOCK PLAT HILLMANS LK. WASH. GARDEN OF EDEN SEC 5 . TWP 23 RANGE 5E WM MAP PAGE83ADD. PROOPRAf't PDV• 115 NAME OF PROJECT/PLAT THE BLUFFS PUD DEFERRAL REQUESTED: NA Chapter 11,City Code,9-1102,9.1&9.2 ( ) OFF SITE: ()curbs, ()gutters, () sidewalks,()water lines, ()storm drainage sewers, ()sanitary sewers, ()street lighting,() street signs,()street paving,()other utilities ( ) ON SITE: () curbs, () gutters, () sidewalks,() water lines, ()storm drainage sewers, ()sanitary sewers, ()street lighting, () street signs, ()paving,()landscaping,and ()other utilities EXPLANATION AND JUSTIFICATION (IN DETAIL): Page 1 of 2 • • APPLICATION FOR ACTION ITEMS CITY OF RENTON BOARD OF PUBLIC WORKS VARIANCE REQUESTED: PRIVATE ROAD GRADE EXCEEDING 8% ( ) UNDERGROUNDING ( ) DRIVEWAY ( ) SLOPE GRADES ( ) EXCESS USE OF RIGHT OF WAY EXPLANATION AND JUSTIFICATION (IN DETAIL): THE ONLY SATISFACTORY ACCESS TO THE DEVELOPABLE PORTION OF THIS PROPERTY REQUIRES ROAD GRADES EXCEEDING 8%. THE PROPOSED ROAD ALIGNMENT WAS DESIGNED TO MINIMIZE BOTH SITE/VEGETATION DISTURBANCE AND ROAD GRADE. SEE ATTACHED DODDS ENGINEERS LETTER DATED FEBRUARY 23, 1990. I DECLARE THAT I AM THE OWNER/AGENT OF THE PROPERTY INVOLVED IN THIS APPLICATION, AND THAT THE FOREGOING STATEMENTS AND ANSWERS HEREIN CONTAINED AND THE INFORMATION HEREIN SUBMITTED ARE IN ALL RESPECTS TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF. Signature of Applica/ DATE GRANTED: DATE DENIED: DATE APPEALED: Page 2 of 2. forms/def-ap/bh • DODDS ENGINEERS, . INC.. CIVIL ENGINEERING SURVEYING PLANNING February 23, 1990 . DEI Project No. 88139 Mr. Colin Quinn Lincoln Property Company,N.C., Inc. 1745 - 114th Ave. S.E., Suite 100 Bellevue, W.A. 98004 Re: "The Bluffs"-Access Road Geometries and a need for City of Renton Acknowledgment Dear Colin: Attached is an exhibit of the proposed entry road geometries at "The Bluffs". The horizontal and vertical design criteria utilized approaches the limits of Renton's standards. We have proposed a maximum centerline road grade of 15%. The City of Renton • requires justification and approval of any road grade which exceeds 8%. The minimum centerline radius utilized is fifty feet. The primary reason for the entry road geometries is to minimize site disturbance. • The approximate elevation of Lake Washington Blvd., near the entrance to the site, is 65'. The approximate elevation of the low point of the developed area is 155'. This is a 90' climb in grade! Utilizing a 15% road grade would require approximately 600' of roadway. If an 8% road grate were utilized, approximately 1125' of roadway (almost double) would be rewired to accomplish the same vertical grade change. The entry alignment proposed is carefully nestled into the contours of the small canyon and climbing hillside. Cuts and fills are minimized (in spite of the steep terrain) to plus • or minus fifteen feet. If, however, the 8% road grade were utilized, the 1125' entry road would have to begin further south and cruelly scar the sharp ridge lying just south of the currently proposed alignment. Cuts and fills for this alternative would approach thirty five feet! Construction would be more than twice as difficult and site disturbance would be more than twice as significant! The proposed design is clearly the better option.If additional explanation or exhibits are desired, please give me a call. I hope we can receive preliminary approval of this proposal with little opposition. Sincerely, DODDS ENGINEERS,INC. 1 "j„, • Roy .Lewis,Jr.,B.E. Associate/Project Engineer Enclosure: Entry Road Exhibit cc: Scott Springer • John Phillips Len Milbrandt • 42OS 148TH AVE. N.E., SUITE ECC-OELLEVUE. WA 98007 (2061 885-7877 OR 454-3743 r •J FAX:r2DE1 5E5- F 1-c8$ (90?) XUU E8:L1, OF, 9? gad i • • .--...................-......--- ........ . ' •'V,..--' • i 4-.. ...••••••- ' ' .-'4j..- A 4-' .... .....................-........ . ,. 7 ..\,,,-.............. 7- e• '4:':'.`•. N.. i i i ....•-••••"'..- -''''' '.. ••s••'''''..,.. / /..-- • ..„.. , 41111 . Nib 1. C.2 s.,,,. . " '--------• ,.'4 '••. AM -.,• .-.1.:_.•, • •o I 1, • • I ••••••••........ \ .. ::' • f f if , ."—',N. ',, , ..... : • - ,:-.....• -- " '-, „.--' „......• •,... • i i . - i i i ,-- ,- ‘ ."'N.. ....-1 Ay- -- '''''''''' .0 i / ...----- • I.Li ',pd.,/ . •...„... • .. ..! i i / .../ i i f \\,.. ... •... ,. - - ..,,•'" , IT ____-:"Ire • „.,,o' ,--1 1 / r • (.1 s ., -.. ,....„, t 0 Jo.....,,,, it ...........,,,..4,5.c.,,--... o_ ..--- . : ..., .„-- •-•. 1 .. • , \ 4/. ::.1 ...„.•-• ''.......... . .„,0„.... K:V42`.1/4._,...''' ••••• .--, ..,. . f •• ! ' • ,,• 5, 5 15 ,. \ 1 '- i • 1 , _ 1 ,:t.........— ...„,......- ,„....-3 4,. ,2 / / ,.: , .ir / • ." ,, ,4911 ..f .. .".. \ ‘.., .00 ....-,1.,... ..,y;oefii‘VG%-41 ....,. ..... .. ..:4 N.,_ ,,,p •%, . .5... .... , .., ....'...." , '';'...713..C.75.,6-0•Vg'0•%°":7if,..„,i .1.%..,:...3 / j- • ..1.4.4.-.e '". ...... ...0 &z...Va .1: • $4. II' / ..... -...,..•-•-^"' ,..,--'' ' rilF ER tftedisoL."4.' ..'. ,s... A -<-.:c 1.• i " 1 k Cr ._,..............---••••-7;-----""--1 f i 151 ., .....•"*''''. i - j i i 1 i / " • --4t,.", .‘"..."...8 OP..'AP"Op 4 4"1:.".0 '..‘ / ' 1,.V.4:•.e>'‘ *•.. • 1:. ..."11' '.‘4....1110 , ,.'....i 4/''e., i I el'.° °'..' 't 4$. ••''• •:•:*"'.'-'• .• .:. I. ' 11 a 'al.. *4% ' %ft./ ., • ...'.....1 W.,-:1.....,... ...... ,.v•. ... Vi7 r• . ..............r- . II VrIal , .----------",,% i /1:/1, A. --.. ---:#-= ' 1 . ;II,- i .., P.'"'""--,. '. ' " 4rii` ,'''........, \ : .••• li.. CC' ; 111 1 0 , .' 1 ....."2:5. •,.. .i • • " ' ' -a*.s'"A441 j a V nj::;' .. ..."". . Napvlip 3 mm(1/fit ',At A.'''''cc• [ ;e 411° -—• '''''''' i i ; / ; i .1 1 -'1"..c' " '\ ' 411W .• - `...... ' -,.. / ,..? .- it 1 ga • 4. , i s \ , . , ''''''.:::N,1,----z-•=t-•<"' — / z __.- .„-•'---- •A ...... ...i ,_.......„,.......„..„---- ,...,,,,,,, ,,, ,,.,..:.:-,,,,,,,,r• --„,....., ••,,...,.."4 .. ------ ,... 0,, 1 • - -- :::q . , : • ,. . - , ,-- \ . i `• Ilit ...- ..6:. c. 4i,,,--- , i • t A % ",-...04.10.0eltors 'Abs.- .: • - ...-- 1 ; i ,...- vO J.: „ , 1 ,.. V.V...1.‹-"a' ' . ....• - ' ..... .1 \ I t f "' I• .-1:1 111 ._: fratio,q.,....... . ---,......,"- . -.9-Pi i t 4 0 . i .! ...•- OV.----•--- -- ,.... ...--.-. .• ,' .- ...^ , ‘ ) ; 1 ! -• . •,,. ti, ': r . '.; 1 i 1 \ •••-- ..... 'IV --- i / ....f ',. .." 4....r..a...t.k,... ...r '-',:,,,,mIllr. Ilk .,.,..,. ..*•." , i . 1 1 . i ... % / l',. .•'.g • ,,t4 1 \ . : . „- -------0!•% .,-.54. \ . 111 ..,.. ,,,,,,,,,...:„vi1/4„,,d,,.;‘,01A./4-,. .___ .1 t _•-• . 010,iii,lb 01pAiimai • • 4, . . 1 ..• 1 % ; in ti.).'.,.. . % 1 1 __;„....,,,,,A.,1 ..• , ...*".•••/•" ':. 1 10)1..r- 0 . .0 lower ask. 0- ..,:/7, r i ' / / •' i.-..''.7"1".... ' ' r•:.,-. 4 .7.*C''. ' V-- ',...-•''-lip!'. •ce. "-"`.'"'s • 'IA\ . .111 / 1 .... '...di . \• / ,.... I' / .:•• „:11111111111114. ..••• ; ‘ ''' 11 ' ' ..0.."..•s"....•••/ ! '' f ) .. .1„,„..;•4-..-",,, - • i. 1,161- .1' ."- .• --„,.... . • ,.(5,,--.4241-4.;*;'-. . ',. .: i ...' ...s. •.:0.. i ‘ :1 11 '': , ''''' ....„, •';4‘..''''''''i 1 I ' :' Z i . i -."• ' ...., , • „._ ...-- , „ :: i • _ l ..." • , . 1. t ; k % ••••••••--- ...-•""--- 1 c 1, I . /- . ...- ,-- i .„ \•‘L. / ‘ I - ,,- ,• . ... L,- : „--- ___...... ,..- . " .....-""'" / .1% ..'-' \ -NE./.."•• '. It % '' ''' • , .., • fri • - .,' . ---,i0 - ..° 11111111\--, ‘C) : -r N. • V . , / , "-'-'.-"" ....,.. ..., ,-..... ) \ I .A., \‘ /11.•• s.. 4, \ -. iv- ,7 . _.,-.--, .., \ --- „. ', -; k \ ':: ":. -: I • ' ..- .e•-• , „..,. ....,..--„,,,--- ...„.-- ) 1 "1-. ••/ , , ..„-•-," .--- ..,.. • \ ' ..• 1 ' , N''-' -. •- ,,..--" .,...7 ,..• „... .-• .. 1' „. A. r ... t. IL 1 : ••:. ....' ‘ , :' ..-,.. , / •40 ...,•-•... ....•/. • ..........".., ,..........."....,....:Nrithig:...„ :410..... •• . 1 \ '....' ./.••'''''. ,..".• .-'... '•.' r.,../ .• ....••• ..•-•• . .„-............-....... N C ..• . , , • ...... , ...- • __,,_,,,,,,,,,,..: 4.... ,.....400 . t r.. ---•.' .., '-'•-•• ....,'• - V 0 % ....• . ..../.'• i. .7 591-C ...........••-•---- ,,,,-..., liaitt , i Mill C ...• ......,..;.;•••4.::'" „.„....." ,...- ......,' 90 _ \ ( ,ip• ,, ... I:. ,...._ ..... ik .. ,...,.. .....ir‘,": _ ot ,..., ..... ....- . ... • .... _--- •--, „,/, --... ,.(i6lbecy le/ 1..- "‘"-•,,,.. \ \-../ /././ — i '315111111-1111,1 • - ........„. 0....,/fri,.....„..."..y.....„................,.........„.... .../ .• '.:. - ,,,,,,,,-..v.w --;-. 0,-r.: ..----- - . ..• .")o•r: :Ls. -..--,,, • , • • _- ....' ir. . ....-". .... - /..'....`• dri f)••'s i Ilt4r&f'" .q .A. ... e %S134+01:11) May 4, 1992 enton City Council Minutes Page 196 Planning: Planning/Technical Services Division requested amendment to Resolution Comprehensive Plan #2878, Comprehensive Plan and Area-Wide Zoning Process (adopted & Area-Wide Zoning 1/27/92), to allow specific projects to be exempt from the resolution. Amendment (Res. Refer to Planning and Development Committee. #2878) Latecomer Agreement: Technical Services and Utility Systems Division submitted request for Little, Maple Ave. latecomer agreement, Thomas W. and Laura Little, for fire hydrant and NW, Fire eight-inch watermain installed in Maple Avenue NW, south of vacated Hydrant/Watermain NW Third Place. Refer to Utilities Committee. (LA-002-92) Public Works: Transportation Division requested approval of agreement with U.S. West Maintenance Cables & Communications to restate ownership and repair/replacement Conduit, Airport, responsibilities for wood conduits located underneath Airport runway, and U.S. West establish maintenance responsibility for additional cables and conduit. Refer to Transportation(Aviation) Committee. Public Works: Transportation Division requested authorization to increase maintenance Maintenance Staff staff (1.0 FTE) to maintain existing service levels and handle increased Increase, Valley Com service requests from Valley Com; required expenditure $34,000, revenue generated $34,000. Refer to Transportation. (Aviation) Committee. Streets: Soos Creek Transportation Division requested approval of agreement with INCA Plateau & Kent- Engineers, Inc. to prepare a route design and environmental impact report Renton Valley and to obtain corridor establishment for the construction of a section of Corridor, INCA Eng. new main arterial that will improve east-west accessibility between Soos Creek Plateau and Kent-Renton Valley; required 'expenditure $199,914.00. Refer to Transportation (Aviation) Committee. CAG: 90-079, Lk. Utility Systems Division submitted Task Order #8, CAG-079-90, with Washington #2 Lift RH2 Engineering, PS, to perform an engineering evaluation of Lake Station, RH2 Eng. Washington #2 lift station to determine replacement station type and layout, and prepare construction plans, specifications, and estimate for implementation of proposed replacement; required expenditure $75,753. Refer to Utilities Committee. Public Works: 1992 Utility Systems Division submitted 1992 Mosquito Abatement Program Mosquito Abatement. Entomologist/Pest Control consultant agreement for Panther Creek Program Wetland. Refer to Utilities Committee. MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY NELSON, COUNCIL APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA AS AMENDED. CARRIED. Removed Items: Administrative Services requested approval of biennial budgeting Item 8.d: approach for the City of Renton. MOVED BY STREDICKE, Budget Biennial SECONDED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, COUNCIL REFER THIS Budget MATTER TO THE COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE. CARRIED. • Item 8.q: Development Services Division requested approval of contract Planning: amendments with Bill Stalzer for completion of work on the PACCAR PACCAR/Orchards and Orchards Project and planning assistance on an on-call basis; (CAG-033-91) & Plan expenditure required $17,455 for PACCAR/Orchards project & $20,000 Review, Stalzer for as needed planning services. (CAG-027-91) CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL Al #: g \ Submitting Data: PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS For Agenda of May 4, 1 992 Dept/Div/Board.. PLANNING/TECHNICAL SERVICES DIVISION Staff Contact. KAY SHOUDY, PLANNING DIRECTOR Agenda Status Consent Subject: Public Hearing... AMENDMENT TO COUNCIL. RESOLUTION 2878 - Correspondence.. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND AREA-WIDE ZONING PROCESS Ordinance Resolution X Old Business Exhibits: New Business ISSUE PAPER (ATTACHED) Study Sessions.... • • Other Recommended Action: Approvals: Refer to Planning and Development Committee. Legal Dept X Finance Dept... Other Fiscal Impact: Expenditure Required... Transfer/Amendment Amount Budgeted Revenue Generated • Summary of Action: Resolution 2878 passed by the City Council in January was intended to incorporate rezones and comprehensive plan amendments into a single process. culminating in adoption of an interim land use element and area-wide zoning in December, 1992. At the time the resolution was adopted in January, 1992, a number of rezones were underway with a substantial investment in the projects. The proposed amendment would allow specific projects to be exempt from the Resolution and to continue forward in the review process. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Adopt Amendment to Resolution No. 2878 including list of exempt projects. ww/agnbillform/bh-jw • CITY OF RENTON MEMORANDUM DATE: May 4, 1992 TO: City Council VIA: Mayor Clymer FROM: Lynn C�tt�ann, Administrator Plan itiggB)t1ilding/Public Works STAFF CONTACT: Kay Shoudy, Planning Director SUBJECT: PROJECTS AFFECTED BY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2878 (COMP. PLAN PROCESS) Background Resolution 2878 was passed by the City Council on January 27, 1992, to incorporate proposed rezones and comprehensive plan amendments into a single process that would culminate with the adoption of the Interim Land Use Element and Areawide Zoning in December, 1992. At the time the Resolution was adopted, there were a number of rezone projects substantially underway ("in the pipeline") that would be affected by the procedures in the Resolution. Issue The Long Range Planning Section has reviewed the "pipeline" projects to determine which should be exempt from Resolution 2878. Criteria used to identify exempt projects were: a. filing of a complete application and completion of all or a portion of the SEPA review; or b. completion of a public hearing or scheduling for a public.hearing. Projects which had been formally withdrawn by the applicant will not be considered to be exempt from the Resolution. A list of projects proposed to be exempt are attached as Exhibit B. A draft amendment to the Resolution has also been prepared by the City Attorney (Exhibit A) to exempt projects these projects from the requirements of the Resolution. Recommendation The Planning Division staff recommends that the City Council adopt the proposed amendment to Resolution 2878, and that the attached list of projects be exempt from the process in the Resolution (Exhibit B). EXHIBIT A CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 2878 BY EXEMPTING CERTAIN APPLICATIONS FROM THAT RESOLUTION. WHEREAS, the City of Renton adopted Resolution No . 2878 which established a single process for rezones and comprehensive plan amendments until adoption of the new comprehensive plan; and WHEREAS, certain projects were well advanced in the review and permitting process such that the city had received materially complete applications and the projects had undergone SEPA review; and WHEREAS, including those advanced projects within Resolution No . 2878 would work a hardship on the projects; and WHEREAS, it would be equitable to exempt those projects from the projects to be handled under Resolution No. 2878 . NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS : SECTION I . The above recitals are found to be true and correct in all respects . SECTION II . Land use amendments or rezones for which complete applications were received and substantial progress has been made in processing the application, including SEPA review, prior to the adoption of Resolution No . 2878 on January 27 , 1992 , will not be part of the area-wide zoning process under that Resolution but will proceed unaffected by that Resolution under the normal city scheduling process . A list of the projects to be 1 RESOLUTION exempted is attached hereto and_ incorporated by reference herein as if fully set forth. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of , 1992 . Marilyn J. Petersen, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of , 1992 . Earl Clymer, Mayor Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney RES . 206 : 4/18/92 : as . 2 • EXHIBIT B Pipeline Projects To be Exempted from Resolution 2878 May 4, 1992 1. Book Bales Rezone (110-91) 1726 Duvall Rezone from G=1 to R-2 with Conditional Use STATUS: Scheduled for Hearing Examiner on April 14, 1992. 2. Tall Firs Townhomes (056-91) 4808 NE Sunset Blvd. 37 Townhomes Rezone from G-1 to R-2 STATUS: Scheduled for. the Hearing Examiner on April 14, 1992. 3. The Orchards (138-90) NE 8th and Duvall Ave. NE. 275 Multi-family units, 121 single family lots, 68 townhomes, 28,000 s.f. of commercial/office Contract rezone to R-3 STATUS: Scheduled for the Hearing Examiner on April 7, 1992 for Site Plan approval. • 4. Kennydale Apartments (085-90) 4100 Block of Lincoln NE 198 units of multi-family Rezone from G-1 to R-3 STATUS: Approved by the Hearing. Examiner; Council put on hold (conditioned on Fire Benefit Zone). 5. Malesis Rezone and Short Plat (050-90) 2202 Smithers Ave. So. Single family residential Rezone from G-1 to R-1 STATUS: Approved by Hearing Examiner; approval expires 9/18/92. 6. The Bluffs, east of L. Wash Blvd., west of 1-405 167 units multi-family Rezone from R-1 to R-3 STATUS: EIS completed; project not expected to proceed. 7. Bakke, Inc. (107-88) N.E. 4th and Union Ave. SE 111 multi-family units Rezone from G-1 to R-3 and B-1 STATUS: Approval will expire in April; have requested two-year extension from Hearing,ixaminer. 8. Forest Creste (093-88) Duvall and SE 124th 200 multi-family units Rezone from G-1 to R-3 STATUS: DEIS will be completed within month. • 9. Dodi Thompson (045-88) 1222/1224 Kirkland Ave NE Rezone from R-2 to R-3 STATUS: Hearing Examiner recommended approval with restrictive covenants. 10. Sunset Gardens II/Crystal Heights (073-91) Rezone STATUS: (See attached letter from applicant). „ v CITY OF RENTON PI IC WORKS DEPARTMENT REQUEST FOR INFORMATION OR CONCURRENCE DATE: April 21 , 1992 TO: Larry Warren, City Attorney FROM: Lynn Guttmann CONTACT PERSON: Kay Shoudy (5546) SUBJECT: Amendment to Resolution No. 2878 Attached for your review, changes and/or comments is the agenda.-bill and attachments, am 2878 Please return to staff contact person for subsequent action by Apri l 24 , 1992 Thank you. REVIEWER #1 CONCURRENCE: Name Date form/concurgt/bh Arnr- Sound Plannin £o orU4+[on 10717 NE Fourth Street Bellevue,WA 98004 Fax:206/646-9694 206/455-1822 ,Ss os April 13 , 1992 ._ . ' ;,rT^ . APR. :' I) 1992 Mrs Kay Shoudy. Manager Planning & Technical Services Department of Planning, Building and Public Works City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South • Renton, Washington 98055 RE: CRYSTAL HEIGHTS/R-SA-073-91 EXEMPTION FROM RESOLUTION 2878 Dear Mrs . Shoudy: Thank you for taking a moment on Wednesday, April 8th, to discuss the impact of the implementation of Resolution 2878 on my client . I understand that you are requesting that' the City Council specifically exempt certain land use • applications that were in the planning process prior to January 1 , 1992 . My client, Cliff Mull , approached me back in June 1991 to prepare the rezone application for a multiple family project on the west side of Sunset Boulevard N.E. . His project known as "Crystal Heights" was submitted in October and assigned a file number of R-SA-073-91 . At our preliminary review, Mr. Don Erickson, requested that because of the geographic location, shape, size, topography, and history of neighborhood development that we attempt to enlarge the project to include the adjacent property owners . Over the last 6 months we have been proceeding and have expended over $35 , 000 . 00 in funds in following the request by staff . My client ' s reflect specific site and building design details that were required as part of the site plan submission. Presently, he is expending another $4, 000 . 00 for the conceptual storm water drainage plans . Since our time schedule would call for construction and occupancy by the summer of 1993, we would request that we be included your request for as an exemption to Resolution 2878 . Sincerely, Roger4'& B aylock 41 CITY OF REN '110ly planning/Buildint blic Works Department • Lynn Guttmann, Administrator Earl Clymer, Mayor PLANNING DIVISION CITY OFRENiON April 13, 1992 APR 1 3 1992 RECEDIED Roger Blaylock 10717 NE 4th Street, Suite 9 Bellevue, Washington 98004 Re: Your June 27, 1991 Application for Rezone and Site Plan Approval Crystal Heights Apartment Project--File nR-SA-ECF-073-91 Dear Mr. Blaylock: This letter is sent to formally advise you that we need additional Plan Approval inforapplimation in order to further process the above referenced In July of last year we requested additional information (i.e. storm drainage plan and report) and recommended several revisions to the above-referenced application. When we returned the package.to you, you indicated that revisions would be returned within a few weeks. To date, we have not yet received these revisions or the additional information we requested. Since it has been several months since your original application was submitted to us, we will need to return your application fees (80%) and close out the file if we do not receive a complete application package by May 13, 1992. • and the As you know, we are presently working on a Comprehensive Land Use e Plf yolan pudte application City Council has revised the rezone process for this year's applications. is closed out, you will have to re-apply through the Planning and Technical Services Division (Long Range Planning) and await the final disposition of the Land Use Plan and associated zone changes. I have enclosed the current City of Renton "Rezone" and "Site Plan Approval Submittal Requirements". Please review the instruction sheets and let me know if you have any questions about the additional inaormation that package require canln order to exedite be reached apt 235 2550W of your Rezone/Site Plan Approval application Sincerely, 4ez,k • Laureen Nicolay / Associate Planner L,, enclosures • cc: Don Erickson Kay Shoudy. 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 u ( -u. � a �. _ CITE F RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works Department Earl Clymer, Mayor Lynn Guttman,Administrator July 24, 1991 Colin Quinn Director, Land Use Planning Lincoln Properties 1745-114th Avenue SE, Suite 100 Bellevue,Washington 98004 Reference: The Bluffs Land Use Application File R-SA-ECF-044-89 Dear Mr. Quinn: I am writing this letter to inquire about the status of the above referenced project. As you are aware, Don Erickson and I met with you on May 20 to review the project status. At that time you stated you were considering redesign of the project to respond to market and financial conditions. The City of Renton is most interested in assisting Lincoln Properties in implementing a project on the Bluffs site. I would appreciate it if you could advise us of the project status and let us know if we can be of any assistance in the resolution of planning issues. For the purposes of scheduling,we would also like to know when to expect a final application for the project. If you have any questions, or I can be of assistance, please feel free to call me at 277-6167. Sincerely, Paul D. Forsander, Senior Planner 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 0` . .MTV OF G EIITO I MAR 2 91991 RECEIVED +Cd'1V CLERK'S OFFICE 159. qL/ AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION LeAnne Hutton • 51067 ,being first duly sworn on oath states - that he/she is the Chief Clerk of the ' P 'CITV,,,OF RENTON - NOTICE OF VAI A6 ITY , AND TIME EXTENSION VALLEY DAILY NEWS j Notice is given under SEPA, RCW 03.216.080, that the City of Renton has • Kent Edition • Renton Edition • Auburn Edition issued the Final EIS for the Bluff Apartment iComplex. Copies of the Final EIS are avail- Daily newspapers published six (6) times a week. That said newspapers able cfur informationporchase for counter$10.0 per copy oatr the public (SEPA Informa- are legal newspapers and are now and have been for more than six tion Center) of the Development Services • months prior to the date of publication referred to, printed and published Division on the third floor of the Renton in the English language continuallyas dailynewspapers in Kent, KingMunicipal , Renton,ing locatedat Mill Ave- in nue South, Washington 98055 County, Washington. The Valley Daily News has been approved as a legal (235-2550). Reading copies are available in newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for the Renton municipal Library at the above address. King County. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The Bluffs The notice in the exact form attached, waspublished in the Kent Edition ECF;R;SA-044-89 cs Rezone 22.6 acre site from R-1 Resi- xx , Renton Edition xx• , Auburn Edition xX , (and not in dential to R-2 Residential Designation supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers and the construction of 165 unit duringresi- the below statedperiod. The annexed notice a p»h 1 ; r tv c�f-1 r e dental planned unit rteportion development (PUD)on a site in the northern portio of the City of Renton. #5 4 8 5 . LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: The project is located between Lake Washington Boulevard North and was published on March 18 ,.. 1 9.9 1 1-405, east of Gene Coulon Memorial Beach Park. Any appeals as to the adequacy of the Draft and Final EIS must accompany an The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the appeal of the agency's decision on the pro- sum of$ 59. 94 -. posed action as specified in WAC 197-11-680.The City of Renton will issue a mitigation document giving conditions to address the environmental impacts dis- cussed in the Draft and Final EIS. This is Ia►i� U.l1QVellA64---•---- the agency's decision document. The appeal may be filed with the City of Renton Hearing Examiner's Office,200 Mill Avenue , South, Renton, Washington 98055 and Subscribed and sworn before me this 2 6.t h. day of Mar. 19 91 must be received no later than 20 days from date of issuance of the mitigation docu- ment.The issuance of the mitigation docu- ment has been delayed. Once the mitiga- tion document has been issued,legal notice will be made stating the deadline for SEPA appeals. - p ,Q� Published in.the.#Valley Daily alarm CM arch 18, 19910.Acct 'No 51067.,5485 . Notary Public for the State of Washingt _ residing at A bIttr - King County, Washington VDN#87 Revised 4189 Fr) 410 iiigh March 25. 1991 Renton City Council Minutes Page 106 S cr Claim: Puget Sound Claim for damages in the amount of $272.55 filed by Puget Sound Power 1 Power & Light Co., CL- Light Co., 620 S. Grady Way, Renton, for damaged anchor wire allegedly 91-028 pulled down by City crews (2/4/91). Refer to City Attorney and insurance ': service. • 1 , Claim: Martin, CL-91- Claim for damages in the amount of $1,800.00 filed by Rowland J. Martin, 029 661 Taylor Avenue NW, Renton, for property damage allegedly caused by broken water main on NW 7th Street and Taylor Avenue NW (3/14/91) ' ' • Refer to City Attorney and insurance service. CAG: 90-105, Human Housing & Human Services Department submitted Human Service Plan Services Plan, 1991-1994 developed by consultant to evaluate services provided or needed by the community. Refer to Community Services Committee and Committee of the Whole (April 8, 1991 agenda). Appointment: Municipal Mayor Clymer recommended appointment of Sarah Elboom, 13503 Martin Arts Commission Luther King Jr. Way, #A-206, Seattle, to the Municipal Arts Commission for (Elboom) a three-year term expiring 12/31/93. Refer to Ways and Means Committee. Space Needs: Municipal Parks Department submitted Municipal Building Construction Report which Building Construction was prepared as part of the long term'space needs program. Refer to Report Committee of the Whole (April 8, 1991 agenda). Planning: Comprehensive Planning/Building/Public Works (Planning Division) requested review of Plan Policies EIS contract for preparation of the Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for Comprehensive Plan Policies. Refer to Planning and Development Committee. MOVED BY NELSON, SECONDED BY ZIMMERMAN, COUNCIL ADOPT THE CONSENT AGENDA AS PRESENTED. CARRIED. • Separate Consideration: Item 6.i - Planning/Building/Public Works (Transportation Division) CAG: 90-108, Walkway requested approval of task order for Comprehensive Walkway Program Program (Add. #1-91) preliminary engineering with Transportation Planning & Engineering, Inc.; ' $20,000; CAG-108-90, Addendum #1-91. . ' MOVED BY NELSON, SECONDED BY ZIMMERMAN, COUNCIL REFER ITEM 6.I TO THE TRANSPORTATION (AVIATION) COMMITTEE. CARRIED. CORRESPONDENCE Correspondence was read from Joan Jensen, 2721 Meadow Avenue, Renton, CAG: 89-072, The Bluffs noting changes in floor area from 125,400 to 214,500 square feet and Apartment Project EIS impervious area from 4.1 acres to 5.4 acres between the draft and final Environmental Impact Statements (EIS) for The Bluffs apartment project, and asked if the sale of two acres next to the development had any relation to these changes. Rezone: Kennydale Councilwoman Zimmerman entered correspondence from K. E. Saeter, 8833 Apartments, 4100 Block 114th Avenue SE, Renton, requesting that Council give thoughtful ' • Lincoln Avenue NE (SA, consideration to citizen concerns regarding the Kennydale apartment site R-085-90) approval and rezone (SA, R-085-90), 4100 block of Lincoln Avenue NE. OLD BUSINESS Referred 2/18/91 - Transportation (Aviation) Committee Chairman Edwards Transportation presented a report stating that the Committee recommended that the item Committee regarding removal of a fuel storage facility at the Renton Airport by Boeing Airport: Removal of, be removed from Committee referrals as no Council action is required. ' ' Fuel Storage Facility Airport: FAA Airport Referred 2/18/91 - Chairman Edwards further reported that the Committee Improvement Project recommended that Council authorize the Administration to pursue application (AlP) for an Federal,Aviation Administration (FAA) Airport Improvement Project ' (AIP) grant, and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute necessary assurances, certifications, and agreements related to the grant application and offer. The Committee further recommended that the grant amount not exceed $425,000 and the City's share not exceed $47,223 (10 percent). i\ MOVED BY EDWARDS, SECONDED BY ZIMMERMAN, COUNCIL L\ CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Policy: Consultant Service MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY ZIMMERMAN, COUNCIL Policy REAFFIRM THE CITY POLICY THAT AN INDIVIDUAL TERMINATING EMPLOYMENT WITH THE CITY OF RENTON NOT BE HIRED TO 71 PERFORM CONSULTING SERVICES FOR THE CITY FOR A PERIOD OF ONE YEAR FOLLOWING FINAL DATE OF EMPLOYMENT. CARRIED. Oil . . ' . . . CITY OF RENTON • MAR 1 91991 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION RECEIVE*; 61 • L e An n e Hutton Crre CLERICS OFFICE 51 0 6 7 ,being first duly sworn on oath states that he/she is the Chief Clerk of the VALLEY DAILY NEWS VCITY©F RE TON • Kent Edition •.Renton Edition • Auburn Edition , `-NOTICE-OF'AVAILABILITY Notice is given under SEPA, RCW • •'� Daily newspapers published six (6) times a week. That said newspapers 43.216.080, that the City of Renton has Apart- are legal newspapers and are now 'and have been for more than six issued the Final EIS for the Bluffs ar gment Complex. Copies of the final EIS S are months prior to the date of publication referred to, printed and published available,for purchase for$10.00 per copy in the English language continually as daily newspapers in Kent, King at the public information counter (SEPA , County, Washington. The ValleyDailyNews has been approved as a Information Center)oon theof the Development of the y g PP legalServices Division on third floor of the newspaper by order of the Superior Court,of the State of Washington for Renton Municipal Building located at 200- King County. Mill Avenue South, Renton, Washington 98055. Reading,copies are available in the , Renton municipal Library at the above The notice in the exact form attached, was published in the Kent Edition address. • xx , Renton Edition xx DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: • Auburn Edition xx , (and not in Rezone of 22.6 acre site from R-1 Resi- supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers dential to the R-2 Residential Designation during the below stated period. The annexed notice a Public Notice and the construction of 165 unit residential ;.planned unit development(PUD)on a site in the northern portion of the City of Renton. #5 4.0 2 . LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: . The project site is located between Lake • • • March. .1 �: 19:91 • Washington Boulevard North and 1-405, was published on east of Gene Coulon Memorial Beach Park. Any appeals as to the adequacy of the Draft and Final EIS must accompany an . •The full amount of the fee'charged for said foregoing publication is the appeal of the agency's decision on the pro • - g g g 1 posal action as specified in WAC • sum of$ 4 9 9 S f 197-11-680.The City of Renton will issue a mitigation documenty�giv y• edition t • . ; address ih'e:'environmental impacts • cussed in',th'e Draf land Fir al EIS. This is d% LUC `• , the agenc .';' de'6is'ion docu m The ent. ,� appeal "may be-filed w&thetOity of Renton Hearing Examiner's Office.200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, Washington 98055 and 1.S t . Mar .9 1 must be received no later than March 26, Subscribed and sworn before me this day of 19 1991, 5:00 p.m. _ . . ; Published M.'the`tialley•Daily News . March'l,19b1 5402`r `,,�, „:T i P , . • Notary Public for the State of Washin ton • residing at�" • , King County, Washington VDN 487 Revised 4/89 ' 4 CITY OF RENTON NOTICE OF AVAILABILITY AND TIME EXTENSION Notice is given under SEPA, RCW 43.216.080,that the City of Renton has issued the Final EIS for the Bluffs Apartment Complex. Copies of the Final EIS are available for purchase for$10.00 per copy at the public information counter (SEPA Information Center) of the Development Services Division on the third floor of the Renton Municipal Building located at 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, Washington 98055 (235-2550). Reading copies are available in the Renton municipal Library at the above address. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The Bluffs ECF;R;SA-044-89 • Rezone of 22.6 acre site from R-1 Residential to the R-2 Residential Designation. and the construction of 165 unit residential planned unit development (PUD) on a site in the northern portion of the City of Renton. • LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: The project site is located between Lake Washington Boulevard North and 1-405, east of Gene Coulon Memorial Beach Park. Any appeals as to the adequacy of the Draft and Final EIS must accompany an appeal of the agency's decision on the proposed action as specified in WAC 197-11-680. The City of Renton will issue a mitigation • document giving conditions to address the environmental impacts discussed in the Draft and Final EIS. This is the agency's decision document. The appeal may be filed with the City of Renton Hearing Examiner's Office, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, Washington 98055 and must be received no later than 20 days from date of issuance of the mitigation document. The issuance of the mitigation document has been delayed. Once the mitigation document has been issued, legal notice will be made stating the deadline for SEPA appeals. • Publication Date: March 18, 1991 Account No.51067 • r r xt"v'''�a 11 CITE,- --OF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works Department Earl Clymer, Mayor • Lynn Guttman,Administrator • March 12', 1991 • Colin Quinn Director, Land Use Planning Lincoln Properties • 1745 - 114th Avenue SE, Suite 100 Bellevue, Washington 9800.4 Re: The .Bluffs Land Use Application ' City File4R-SA-ECF-044-89 • -Dear Mr. Quinn: This letter its sent to advise you that we will need additional information and processing fees prior to proceeding with our review of the above-referenced project. .In addition to the siteplans, landscaping plans, grading • plans, floor plans and elevation drawings that you have submitted, we also require 11 copies of each of the following: _ • ■ Official application form, ■ Land. use review fees (rezone and site approval) , • -Mailing labels and postage for surrounding property owners and certification form, • Neighborhood detail map, • Tree cutting/Land clearing plan, ■ Rezone justification, and a • ■ Project narrative (including description of exterior building materials--types and colors) . We will -also need one set of PMT reductions for each, plan sheet and one set of colored display maps. Please refer to the enclosed "Rezone Application Procedures" sheet--and attachments--for additional information on these requirements. • Because of the linear nature -of this .project site, it would also be helpful if you could provide us with copies of a • .200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 • City of Renton BULK RATE Planning Division U.S.POSTAGE 200 Mill Avenue South PAID Renton,Washington 98055 PERMIT NO.137 RENTON,WA 98055 Mr. Colin Quinn March 12 , 1991 Page 2 plot plan (and one PMT) drawn at 1"=100' scale. This would enable us to provide the public with a copy of the entire project on one sheet of paper. If you have any questions regarding this letter or the submittal requirements, please feel free to contact either myself or Laureen Nicolay at 235-2550. Sincerely, 4544A6144) Lenora Blauman Senior Planner cc: file enclosures • City of Renton BULK RATE • Planning Division . U.S.POSTAGE 200 Mill Avenue South PAID Renton,Washington 98055 PERMIT NO.137 RENTON,WA 98055 CITY OF RENTON NOTICE OF AVAILABILITY Notice is given under SEPA, RCW 43.216.080,that the City of Renton has issued the Final EIS for the Bluffs Apartment Complex. Copies of the Final EIS are available for purchase for$10.00 per copy at the public information counter (SEPA Information Center) of the Development Services Division on the third floor of the Renton Municipal Building located at 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, Washington 98055. Reading copies are available in the Renton municipal Library at the above address. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Rezone of 22.6 acre site from R-1 Residential to the R-2 Residential Designation and the construction of 165 unit residential planned unit development (PUD) on a site in the northern portion of the City of Renton. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: The project site is located between Lake Washington Boulevard North and 1-405, east of Gene Coulon Memorial Beach Park. Any appeals as to the adequacy of the Draft and Final EIS must accompany an appeal of the agency's decision on the proposed action as specified in WAC 197-11-680. The City of Renton will issue a mitigation document giving conditions to address the environmental impacts discussed in the Draft and Final EIS. This is the agency's decision document. The appeal may be filed with the City of Renton Hearing Examiner's Office, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, Washington 98055 and must be received no later than March 26, 1991,5:00 p.m. Publication Date: March 1, 1991 • Account No.51067 M CITY OF RENTON NOTICE OF FEIS ISSUANCE Description of Agency Action: Environmental Review Committee (ERC) issued Final Environmental Impact Statement on February 25, 1991 on the Bluffs Apartment Complex • (ECF;SA;R-044-89). ERC will issue a mitigation measures document on the above project based on information from the DEIS and FEIS on March • 6, 1991. Description of Proposal: Rezone of 22.6 acre site from R-1 Residential to the R-2 Residential Designation and the construction of 165 unit residential planned unit development (PUD) on a site in the northern portion of the City of Renton. Location of Proposal: The project site is located between Lake Washington Boulevard North and • 1-405, east of Gene Coulon Memorial Beach Park. • • Type of SEPA Review: Declaration of Significance; draft EIS - May 1990; final EIS - February 25, 1991; Mitigation Document with conditions-March 6, 1991. Documents may be examined during regular business hours at Development Services,Third Floor, Municipal Building, 200 Mill Avenue South. LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Development Planning Section APPEAL: Any appeal as to the adequacy of the Draft and Final Environmental Impact Statements, pursuant to WAC 197-11-68 must be consolidated with an appeal on the agency's decision on the proposed action. The mitigation document is this agency's decision which may be appealed together with the FEIS. These appeals may be filed with the Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, by 5:00 PM March 26, 1991. PUBLICATION DATE: March 1, 1991 DATE OF DECISION: February 25, 1991 SIGNATURES: V Lyn A Guttm nn,Administrator DATED Depa ent ofPlanning/Building/Public Works Jo E.Webley,Administrat J DATE Co munity Service Department 41( ( /./1 / Lee ether, Fire Chief DATE Ren on Fire Department CIT' OF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works Department Earl Clymer, Mayor Lynn Guttman,Administrator February 6, 1991 To all interested parties; Attached is the Bluffs Apartments Final Environmental Impact Statement, issued by the Environmental Review Committee of the City of Renton. This document is prepared for the review of citizens groups, governmental agencies in compliance with the Washington State Environmental Policy Act of 1974, Chapter 43.21 C Revised Code of Washington revised SEPA Guidelines, Effective April 4, 1984, Chapter 197-11,Washington Administrative Code,and City of Renton Environmental Ordinance, Chapter 28 of the Renton Zoning Code. The document supplements the information and analysis given in the Draft EIS. The draft and final EIS are the basis for a mitigation document to be issued by the City of Renton. The mitigation document will include all measures needed to address the environmental impacts of this project,as discussed in the draft and final EIS. The mitigation document is considered the agency's decision document. Under the appeal processes outlined in WAC 197-11-680, any appeals as to the adequacy of the Draft and Final EIS must be consolidated with an appeal of the agency's decision on the proposed action, i.e.the mitigation document. Any appeals may be filed with the City of Renton Hearing Examiner's Office,200 Mill Avenue South, Renton Washington 98055 and must be received no later than 20 days after the issuance of the mitigation document. The City is scheduled to issue the mitigation document during the month of April, 1991. Please call 235-2550 if you have any questions. Sincerely yours, Mary Lynne Myer, Sr. Environmental Planner 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 CITY OF RENTON MIL 4 Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Earl Clymer, Mayor Lynn Guttmann, Administrator November 8, 1990 Michael Griggs Regional Manager Department of Natural Resources P.O. Box 68 Enumclaw, Washington 98022 Attention: Sherwin Castro RE: Lincoln Properties/The Bluffs (File #044-89) Dear Mr. Griggs: This letter is written to confirm a conversation of this morning between Lenora Blauman, of my staff, and Sherwin Castro, concerning the application by Lincoln Properties for a Forest Practices Permit for the above-referenced project. As Ms. Blauman reported to Ms. Castro, the project is currently being reviewed by the City for environmental impacts; land use review is scheduled for early in 1991. At the completion of those reviews, if the project is approved, the City will issue a Routine Vegetation Management Permit (please see copy of the Land Clearing and Tree Cutting Ordinance under which the permit is to be issued) . At that time the City would also support the issuance of a Forest Practices Permit by the Department of Natural Resources.. As review is not complete and as no approvals have yet been granted by the City, the issuance of a Forest Practices Permit by DNR would appear to be untimely now. In your review of other applications for Forest Practices Permits within the City of Renton, we would appreciate your asking that the applicant provide verification that a Routine Vegetation Management Permit has been issued by the City. If you have additional questions or would like further information, please contact me at 235-2550. Sincerely, Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2569 15(.4&it W-0:414.a.0%) P)11\- -) STATE CC Q OAIL VV ....�.n / IOSEPH R. BLUM to. • Director / STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF FISHERIES 115 General Administration Building • Olympia, Washington 98504 • (206) 753-6600 • (SCAN) 234-6600 October 29, 1990 Department of Natural Resources Q .`�.+ South Puget Sound Region 28329 Southeast 448th Street 71993 Post Office Box 68 ia'j�'1 Pnumclaw, Washington 98022 REyTON SUBJECT: FPA Number FP-09-15444 Eg�;leef�llg D�p�. Gentlemen: Thank you for this opportunity to comment on the above proposal . This project is a proposed conversion with potential impacts to Lake Washington. Although SEPA has been initiated, the process is not yet completed. Until public and agency comments with subsequent responses can be made on this proposal, the Department of Fisheries recommends no approval of the Forest Practices Application be given. We have concerns regarding, among other things, stormwater drainage and erosion impacts, on Lake Washington and the salmon resource . An Hydraulic Project Approval will likely be required for this project and additional information will be needed prior to issuance of any approval . If you have any questions for me regarding my comments, please contact me at ( 206) 392-7190 . Sincerely, /411d14tes--- Gayle Kreitman Regional Habitat Manager Habitat Management Division gk cc: WDF - Olympia DEPT.OF NATURAL RESOURCES SOUTH PUGET SOUND PENN O C T 3 1 199u PECEI \pzr; STATE OF WASHINGTON � ` DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESuunCES FORE PRACTICES Kr- APPLICATION/NOTIFICATION NOTE TO APPLICANT: Read but DO NOT write In shaded areas. Complete Items 1-18. Use additional sheets as needed. SHUTDOWN ZONE BURN PERMIT ZONE DATE RECEIVED DATE DUE APPLICATION/NOTIFICATION NUMBER 1151 _ 10- 1ct c10 I i -T-cro - P-O9' 15-44& CHECK BOX FOR ANY REQUEST YOU HAVE. NOTE UPLAND MANAGEMENT AREAS AND RIPARIAN MIIANA(Ia`EMENT''IYlylriig REQUESTS REQUESTS GI i Y OF I INTOO DELAYED EFFECTIVE DATE FP APPLICATION RENEWAL NO. ALTERNATE RMZ PLAN ❑ REQUESTED APPROVAL DATE HYDRAULIC PROJECT APPROVAL ❑ (�,,,,'• ,1 1(��(1 FOREST PRACTICE ASSISTANCE ❑ I, PRE-FILING REVIEW LI LANDOWNER WANTS FOREST MANAGEMENT ASSISTANCE ❑ DATA UPLAND MANAGEMENT AREAS f; NOs. ACRES HARVESTING OLD GROW £ 1 # ;i ,? RIPARIAN MANAGEMENT WATER TYPE NO. UNITS- LINEAL FEET STREAM ❑ SIDE(S)El or ® POND/LAKE/BAY 0 ZONES (RMZ) BY: WATER TYPE NO. UNITS LINEAL FEET STREAM 0 SIDE(S) t❑ or s❑ POND/LAKE/BAY 0 WATER TYPE NO. UNITS LINEAL FEET STREAM ❑ SIDE(S)I] or CI POND/LAKE/BAY 0 (ALSO SHOW UPLAND MANAGEMENT AREAS AND RIPARIAN MANAGEMENT ZONES ON MAP) NOTE: TYPE OR PRINT INFORMATION IN PERMANENT BLACK INK.. 1. NAME OF OPERATOR 2. NAME OF LANDOWNER 3. NAME OF TIMBER TAXPAYER (TIMBER OWNER) .1/ADDRESS /�/LQ-Ty C AAA Awvl ADDRESZe '��'�'�e� ADDRESS /7 S—1/f'L. 4 56 e5e-Hie/7- /I- 0x#/e/T A- CI`T TYY/r6 ``� STATE ZIP CITY STATE ZIP CITY STATE ZIP TELEPHONE NUMBER U4 5g TELEPHONE NUMBER TELEPHONE NUMBER ( 2O ) gas- 48/_ ( ) _ c Li4. TIMBER TAXPAY/�'�QF�ULL LEGAL NAME TIMBERRBE TAX REGISTRATION NO. 5. COUNlTJY�// 9 wPEO/AGA EN IT�fy (C p AIC/UNIFIED BUSINESS IDENTIFIER 8. WITHIN CITY LIMIT59 NO ❑ YES SOLE OWNER ❑ PARTNERSHIP ❑ CORPORATION OTHER ❑ Q NAME: CALL 1-800-548-TTAX FOR TAX NUMBER OR TAX INFORMATION 7. LAND PLATTED AFTER JAN. 1, 1980 (INCLUDES SHORT PLATS) 8. IN PUBLIC PARK OR WITHIN 500 FT (e.g. PORT, CITY COUNTY, STATE, FED.p K) (CONTACT CO. ASSESSOR FO v RIFICATION) NO ❑ YES PARK NAME:4rwe CO L k A A 4/C NO 0 YES 9.LEGAL SUBDIVISION OF OPERATION(S)—INCLUDE PARCEL OR TAX LOT 10. SLOPE CONDITION & PERCENT NUMBER IF CONVERSION OR IF PLATTED SEC- TW'• •VW<' UNSTABLE ❑ HIGHLY ERODIBLE 0 A. -5 S E STEEPEST 10% OR SIGNIF. PART OF OPERATION AREA Z.O % B. 11 -4 4 AVERAGE SLOPE /Z/ % C. (>1- /L.� -• /Q' t i... START DATE END DATE �S/'lJ /� IT Jvj (SHOW ON MAP) �l // <O /'1 FED. THREAT. AND ENDANG. SPECIES OR CRITICAL WILDLIFE HABITAT: NAME 7 12. TYPE OF OPERATION 13. METHOD OF OPERATION AND TYPE OF EQUIPMENT 14A. ACREAGE 14B. ROAD IS. EST.VOL TO BE CUT (ALSO SHOW ON MAP) (ALSO SHOW ON MAP) OPERATION MILES A.TOTAL B.PERCENT A. #Z-- o C/E01147z/,J A-5s8-c,/.� F-I0 e. w/ "/ 5-.4.00. ��r��1/'wig--4.-7 Zv 'O 74!:7 C. ROAD ABANDONMENT PROPOSED/PLANNED FOLLOWING COMPLETION OF OPERATION NO ❑ YES 0 (SHOW ON MAP) IS. LOCATION OF WATER OR WATER INTAKES ON OR WITHIN 1/4 MILE OF THE OPERATIONS /....,A ke. 4A/A-5,4 I°`"7T)�J PLAN FOR ROAD CONSTRUCTION OR IMPROVEMENTS OR HARVEST OF 30% OR MORE OF VOLUME IS WITHIN 200 FT. OF SHORELINE OF THE STATE ❑ OR SHORELINE OF STATEWIDE SIGNIFICANCE J (WATER TYPES t AND +1, CONTACT LOCAL GOVT. FOR INFORMATION) APPLICANT IS AWARE OF t OR MORE INTAKES (DOMESTIC. AGRIC., INDUSTRY) ON OPERATION NOX YES ❑ (SHOW ON MAP) SHOW THE TYPE AND LOCATION OF ALL WATERS ON THE ATTACHED MAP (WATER TYPE MAPS ARE AVAILABLE AT REGIONAL OFFICES OF DEPT.) SHOW SIZE AND LOCATION OF ANY WATER CROSSING STRUCTURES. INDICATE ALL ACTIVITIES PLANNED WITHIN OR ABOVE ORDINARY HIGH-WATER MARKS OF ANY WATER OR CHANNEL AND INDICATE WATER TYPE AND OTHER DETAIL: WATER TYPE WATER TYPE WATER TYPE WATER TYPE WATER TYPE OPERATE EQUIPMENT INSTALL CULVERTS BRIDGES FELL TIMBER [1 SKID OR YARD TIMBER (KIND OF) (SIZE OF) (KIND OF) WATER TYPE WATER TYPE (� WATER TYPE WATER TYPE NONE ❑ ROAD OR LANDING ❑ SIDECAST, WASTE I I DEBRIS DISPOSAL ❑ OTHER GIVE APPROXIMATE START AND END DATES FOR THIS WORK: START END (SHOW ACTIVITY & LOCATION ON MAP] 17. LANDOWNER OR PERPETUAL TBABER OWNER REFORESTATION PLAN OR LANDOWNER CONVERSION PLAN HARVESTED LANDS ARE TO BE REFORESTED EXCEPT WHEN CONVERTED TO AN INCOMPATIBLE NON-FOREST USE OR EXEMPT ACCORDING TO RCW 78.09.060(3) AND WAC 222-34-050. THE LANDOWNER DOES ❑ DOES NOT ❑ INTEND TO CLEAR, IMPROVE OR DEVELOP LAND WITHIN THREE YEARS 0 SIX YEARS ❑. IF THE LANDOWNER INTENDS TO CONVERT OR DEVELOP LAND, ATTACH SEPARATE STATEMENT WITH DETAILS INDICATED IN INSTRUCTION SHEET. LOCAL GOVERNMENT MAY REQUIRE ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. AN ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST MAY BE REQUIRED. 50% OR MORE OF THE MERCHANTABLE TIMBER VOLUME IS TO BE REMOVED NO.A YES ❑ (ADEQUATE STOCKING REQUIRED) LANDOWNER INTENDS TO LEAVE ACCEPTABLE STOCKING NO 0 YES 0 SPECIES AVERAGE NO. STEMS/ACRE OR THE LANDOWNER INTENDS TO REFOREST YES 0 • NO ❑ (ATTACH EXPLANATION OR CONVERSION STATEMENT) OPERATOR OR NAMED ALTERNATE IS TO PREPARE SITE. (LANDOWNER OR PERPETUAL TIMBER OWNER IS RESPONSIBLE FOR REFORESTATION) *REFORESTATION WILL BE COMPLETED BY NAME DATE POST HARVEST SITE PREPARATION WILL BE COMPLETED BY NAME DATE DESCRIBE SITE PREPARATION METHOD. (ATTACH SEPARATE STATEMENT IF NEEDED.) METHOD OF REFORESTATION: PLANTING 0 ARTIFICIAL SEEDING 0 NATURAL SEEDING ❑ OTHER 0 (Specify reforestation on additional sheet) IF PLANTING OR SEEDING: SPECIES STOCKING SIZE PROPOSED'STEMS/ACRE IF NATURAL: SEED TREES ❑ SEED BLOCKS ❑ (SHOW ON MAP AND IF ON ADJACENT LANDOWNER, ATTACH AGREEMENT.) METHOD TO CONTROL COMPETING VEGATATION: 18. WE AFFIRM THAT THE INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS TRUE TO THE BEST OF OUR KNOWLEDGE AND UNDERSTAND THAT THIS PROPOSED FOREST PRACTICE IS SUBJECT TO THE CURRENT RULES AND REGULATIONS AND THE FOREST PRACTICES ACT. OPERATOR'S NATURE LANDOWNER'S SIGNAT TIMBEROW SI �TUUREE FOREST I . __1CTICES APPLICATION/NOT ,',ATION Kr PROCESS AND CONDITIONS NOTE TO APPLICANT: Read but DO NOT write In shaded areas. Complete Items 1-18. Use additional sheets as needed. t3IHUTDOWN ZONE BURN PERMIT ZONE DATE RECEIVED DATE DUE APPL.ICAtION/NOTIFICATION NUMBER (l-1 , ID- lq - a0 it -- T-qo TP-01 - 154`4`/ CHECK BOX FOR ANY REQUEST YOU HAVE. NOTE UPLAND MANAGEMENT AREAS AND RIPARIAN MANAGEMENT ZONES. REQUESTS REQUESTS DELAYED EFFECTIVE DATE FP APPLICATION RENEWAL NO. ALTERNATE RMZ PLAN C1 REQUESTED APPROVAL DATE HYDRAULIC PROJECT APPROVAL 0 FOREST PRACTICE ASSISTANCE 0 PRE-FILING REVIEW 0 LANDOWNER WANTS FOREST MANAGEMENT ASSISTANCE 0 DATA UPLAND MANAGEMENT AREAS C NOs. ACRES HARVESTING OLD GROWTH 0 RIPARIAN MANAGEMENT WATER TYPE NO. UNITS LINEAL FEET STREAM 0 SIDE(S) t❑ or 111 POND/LAKE/BAY 0 ZONES (RMZ) BY: WATER TYPE NO. UNITS LINEAL FEET STREAM 0 SIDE(S) t❑ or 0 POND/LAKE/BAY 0 WATER TYPE __—__ NO. UNITS_. LINEAL FEET STREAM 0 SIDE(S) t❑ or 0 POND/LAKE/BAY ❑ (ALSO SHOW UPLAND MANAGEMENT AREAS AND RIPARIAN MANAGEMENT ZONES ON MAP) NOTE: TYPE OR PRINT INFORMATION IN PERMANENT BLACK INK. 1. NAME OF OPERATOR 2. NAME OF LANDOWNER 3. NAME OF TIMBER TAXPAYER (TIMBER OWNER) ,t /,✓ /, " ' % 1 L.. ' r. / ` , L i - - 'r.• ADDRESS t ADDRESS ADDRESS r CITY STATE ZIP CITY STATE ZIP CITY STATE ZIP i 4:- i'4 /. L-' . J('AJ L '- TELEPHONE NUMBER TELEPHONE NUMBER TELEPHONE NUMBER ( %[.O �� r- r"-- ''• / % ( ) _> t* :. ) + ,P'r ,_'t r P,t�7g,,Z }Mr�J`,�� rif F- y �q� r 4 aror ,., ;!',s tsu r 1. , :`'�° .>:Y7,..-a,,,'1,i. c...7ta•„ .,,' ..S+i'i ',K.4d"i: ."a : � I .RY ,- `I .. r ,, r l qu a x t ^. k•t id .{ a 1. i y# °. , t'' 'Yt Y it::-.''''''''': ` en. � ' • . . Ir t r J x f� r4.:I : L r � _ � yy�����tt �� y i $ „lc, ,rr Nier,3,,..-4 41 1 j 0 y` .. s n, r' t.. r'Y"' r � ; i:t ham'-_ ' Tt c .. sz ai_-bh v.n•'N �,4;47.a c. `. :iab.r ,;:, +m♦ t?•1~ . ,: t y :it,,,,.;-•-, b ::..t c 9. °'° " °'yI »'k'.i°j4A•. s EDUCED NO. LEAVEllitEr _SI d C J`§ 1 PARTIAL ( 'i , ORTHEAS 8- ; • •• t., At- '' 33t'o,.. r 2$ '- SHADE RETENTION PLAN FOR•TEMPEfiATURE SENSITIVE WATER ��„_,' `" 'S ` { .t .1_, 0,t.• • .s •.P+a s;.,'^ s /f t• v iar-,.i , i.� t-4:, /1 tie,x 474-. t '?,?•.-'..-.--,' r11 !."., 1a' - I, •r. a.. •L 1 l I 1,- • 1t 1 .Ii ,,•I i� f,, .•.- Sdr. a.a_ a :. d t LC INTERDISCIPLINARY TEAM RECOMMENDATION INCORPORATED .,„ . ))CATS 1 .r as "" t e c+.,, ; b. s ,,,r 'f ..1i, `` KNOWN OR RECORDER:WATER RIGHT LESS THAN ONE"M . DOW TREAM 0`4;, +tt u '4'^"Pi ~-a '4 ",. -4 ,,r 17:-:. .` n .." t..n.... "w<w i`ft`YE:!:'1,.•d'sS`:r-- ,2• .c1,' '`-rv-• tr }� +'- .a• Da . r s�',i q y r ,,- ( r t • ( n • •s4'.., a.. a°.....,r. Z[ °it 'UG • .>1 a C" 's. - v, • - 1'HIS OPERATION IS SUBJECT TO: HYDRA,DI;;.ICS PROJECT APpf i SHOFEI.tNE5 A /ACT , OTHEd ��`^ .. ,.d:- ' - "fie4 f �-4' . ENVIRONME[tIfTTAL} I9 ,. NAIL • `hA•U a q>F ,.�tz�.�..y� ,._ , CONDIT• C FOLLOW. t . �yrS J I. y, r` 1 , ^ y'xP ?axY r y� � #�_ 1 4771 . € r Al: ''''M i4q 1b F 7 ? •� 'r' - `°t.'..E "..r"t.Z pA,�,. r7 - 6 S t••re-t C" •r ti`),,, tb.I,..;,,�•,, • ,- "- t * •SC ,J + ', -`J�rC-`F1 .- t, -'i ,Tt e A r „f ft .` "1�• �5 - 1 J'' ,�,.t ',:45� ..s Pik "7 ..�5,,+; ' i t ��?-*- • L. t ,, --. .+ 1 �� pry `5 • i t,1,:r ,1 .,,•,*SJt„ �ti ` etc.,,,a J , ;.ro,, ",`+ ,' !, .r a°r a +ya' -. ., f2 t ;$,A :7.ate,. - Q+w• es+faf • '# a '#� `.y`r C i.,i..r a 4 a. „b.= �4 •� k ' .,�' �•I+ tC '�(+.i... • .• 4. ~r.�� y 4.,y�ill,,-..., s^r▪ • t_ +•-.Mt { a ,, C >•r t *� .n'+Ta�' i +< istc ,,tc� t3 yt,,, t t i�1� tf� .rs5 a?"- +�. t a �Z�� 'Evr'Yr i 1:T YS {�'R'3R.. Cti!1*'!,l�c'tirt�3'3`S '`��+. • `-- o 't1"t •{,?ram 4,a�'q - y ',A �t x,it, , r t i1 >?,.t R is - _. _ , y.F,t .,. r7 w S 13. ,,j' 'i. '�, `s r/ .ex. .i ,,.a ti• . t -_ .. M i !,,,-- :'•k r#r t. :br ,,z� j . • >• vs„.-- �, .,Y 4� '�'. F•r •A- SM1 7,�.,rf + 4*.,,,'at ra 4 tt,w1y,� •.1 it - '� s y - '� c:. y '�/-y` t 'zr tg ", ' 'S,% 'T ''tl "fq'1.'t.3.! 49w ' ,i.. . 'I' -6.. , Kt1 .,1. ,j 2` "t -'.Q`'Z .. f/4 .. �, '. + .tN ' f! " -.- ?r / u=,yA r t 4 K. r-. ql+( 'F l .t• A•4' ' },* {fit t J ',�.1 'A 1 .i'+�YE^�� E4' �" '�" PT �•_T' • Sf:• '�� "' .. (h -'.+M ;�; -.5 y-. A f p`..` i t..f s ``� -s',i-s .ate t ".'''r�" 4* + a-' 3k #°1A '` e r.:..:.: ▪ ( .5 , i d s. r fir'• -•,r• .. t•� .+Ye t'°s-d.G?t, 1 t 7i��Y s�� ,��' t� -nrs� -e'`�tL`e `'t`w'fti+.'}'+• ii�t'=Tti in �# a'xr.�� `.- __ '.____ s -„,-..• . v ,-y t+•••``,z r t +v,°,t' n'+ki e-• i s r `y4, •4 Y,, it -air le- t. :t ii"• it I_�. 7�s ���• s• � SJ,+'I�t.�' a'Ft, c.t"'# J v4 1 t¢ t <• :'. jsy fr�•"J-�a 1 j"rr' yT l�kiYt� r _'.?••Y t a� k,rt,F"ia., ,,'` l n• ! it*' fS #"`' '..rt••' .v,. :twin*, ^a a,;j{•l :F '} ,y. t A.'Y T Tt t r n _ , 1 '" .'h Y : E' .r.' 5 iS.4 44 r-t, a'r -i z - rr R�` ."•a'. ,, A.ix."••4,,,XF..,.1-°. -.,Ua;^sy, a^. '_+rsn i .. :. .. .i.'�t? R .t ,.t f C:•i. - tc r. .,t a'ji` t r r v•� r`i • 7 .t •:',:,..�`•+ ti t a. t.. r �:. ° j•6 - c IR• ++rL'" u. -).- Jt v :- It`(1..`st ,.',yk • a,..-3 ,•. w may. t '7 -."°,f V i y, e 1! a.} LF fFr. �.ef� q.. .,. Os II- r r, tt ,- (3, w 4 , 7 w f�: • t -,�..rt3i'c•tresrJ,.a'd.kw.:weati..,+ :e r e Y.•uh� .. S•� *1 -• _ 'DEP • 1 T-' • -NA�TU•11 T.1' r - tl y, +,.' ,'� S a' �''. t k -•., i r ' y „f .a n 'I{ i ' V.,73� ..,.t: "f,,k' t`'"••• 'G,�`,ra ''rt •Y•��x t•1•,Y. t c t, 'ir� cti" . . -1-. _ t, ;g r '-Kt5' .' "if 1-n,[ ,i .. .i..;a. -l.(v3 i$i.,w W tr�i ` ; *fle.1 >.•71°ih ll!< u�.'��y ."''''"`;'2.' I: of t,.:,Y$• ._ 'fa .., 7t 4 ?:- L7lZ VF 7t ""7 c - - '.(S,rt s. . a ', 4,,.'t L `° - s Jtt� !, t N1. ):, � ' +4 r • t • 't :.... .ct7 Js.- :+t S,r se t s g "'�"kri4.�I"v TiTf `[: ` .i j � S w °4 F{• i z>..,''+�i';'''tk?,C,707 T.'^ f,~�t'a s tf4i , t 4 Ap •��7•'��r,,t n , �4rr1• J '+.. �..ip,r �"• tom} ' - { '.'yA ty ro {I T,�A `t Y .y7E9• N' ) ,Y IN'{'k'i , '> Y b 1 1 1 C/.�'. c.,- �!" ite-c L is t,t--. `bNPy n.- :.. Q.. :. aG'..'r a • • y I r ` S a, • „•e f F n i it: S• ,,,a$,;.•(.:3� ,, o •: •�.t-• .• •}t,' s° }i'.fllusr»3,t� rt'.�i>t `'S$S.„°'F .a N P/ a of • w M :t t 6'1 ...rE"I.4 j rw td7.61, ! '".v �, t x�. 'i ... h r4 ,+�c 7n. n' _ • ..cry y:t..• > t. 'S eit a�r a G ,t + T;�iy.�tr�i� r ���� ¢ �J; .�t� ,°•+ i ' ^ fill. xw"' �. r> '1 -.�,_;�'V�• to �•w, + ° i4 jr' rt :�S ta,yt ��. '- '- 'i ._ext 1a 1� � ?•dti•: ,+'�^.4 4 ''Fxj.[,n++ e_3i`uAa�t�}i' !'' t43'?�•71fA`S`cea FA�r , , P010, b )►L , 1 +tr of 1. y ¢r• y ! r* ?� ,}�s,,..a, at s Yt r>T�r1 sac , k+Yy l i.`1,�T� R y, ,t , .s + ¢ ,.t�y{„kr + - /.,t�=te _'CG; {'t..h ,���. ter;! `A V Z4� ..'fit t it.�r'L' e a. 0 li C�•!t 'tI"�'1..i-/1..t 5, - F.tl A�•tr.c } s,.r • YP � ` .,7 ...'r` ti •4 a-,.- ,#, ,a S' (f7 .t � � -- 1.- I . ••c.i4.1. . ... , 5f..;,..,........,.‘,.3.. .a..-----.1,4:21,....,,..., CONVERSION STATEMENT (Please Read Carefully) , ;•,.,.,!,,F• .i .1.),;.•,...1.,,,-- 1 •,„..,. ,, • , , , : • ..,,,,,,10,f , •Jr!, -," " If it is possible that this land will be converted to(,.0,,.non-forestry use within six,,,(0),years, contact the County. For a period of up to six (6) years after the date of the Forestktractice 'iry Application, the County, City or regional governmental entities may deny any or arrY, ,, ••,c.•,0. applications for permits or approvals, including building permits and'tubdivision approvals TAti „at relating to non-forestry uses of land subject to the application. (RCW 76.09:060). , •For further information ,contact your County Planner or Department of Community Developmen. p,.. •. ,,, .. i 04.:(. '.. ..",.• . f',f.A.''',/1;• •'..qmc . . . , .. . .P$A1 ..!-::-,-: 'i,..:. ,• .,...,..,,.. ,•:4;,).,... .. '" ;" ‘....-.•''.:....‘4! .. SUPPORTING EVIDENCE FOR ITEM #17 , , •,,•ii t.•••,, c •.. ,•,..- v_, • ' - . • rf0 • 4.•.. _ .: t's • • 1 CO//1\..) / rv"/ Afgx/r coll., ihe prpprty owner, of the arecovered_.,0 . the Forest Practice Appli ation, intend to convert this lanetti: .,•;.f,it., ;,4.11 ,..!-,,,,. • , ,. .. - rAi, :...'.,•$iil,i,,, 4,,. ., ,i,, • .11 „4,14,. ..i.,,.;.,..• ••,,,,.... : •lvvfiev.4-i-,,,.-!' .. 'c. '',ro-t,, A. .'-!' , ,, Agricultural Use , , •i' •' '.4-0, .!liC.‘: . . ,g'",...woi..,•.:', . • i. , . liNc.•• '.....', 41. • „ , .,:k... . 1;.k...4* 1 . How Will the logging slash and debris be cleared or abated: ,- .., • ...• •‘,. , ,; , • .. ., • . it, Pile and Burn Broadcast Burn Natural Deterioration . •-•i'",! 0 -,•„.: _ __ _____ .., •• . .. • • -i., , •.. , ,P. • '0. •••,' •,•4.<•,:.• ..I. 2. What is the general purpose that this agricultural land will be used for , •,.,. • . -•,:c.... ` ••,", ., .4. • :, •, ,...•,‘,.. kiitm. ',.,0." .t., .. „.• . .t, • vv... .....,!!,3'. 1,4:-• Pastiire Crops i . . ... I , ---- • . .„.,. . ...• 1.- •.: • • • •!, i • ,• :44toittiofl, ...,..,„t.•„4.: . . ., 1.,. . .,. --7.... ,.. . . . I• . ,. , I •;..... ,A4 ii.. , . • ' ' ,,;;•..... ...it-•-•cis!;4.'0, -I-T. 3-.1.` `,V 1"if. :'. 11; 4..' . , ''.• .41'. 1%V. ,..p, ' ... . . .I.Lct:•1.. ''':"Ii'll Iltkg Is „ i ...• .• . ,tif‘'. i .,110 l'.'4,. I.,. ••,, 3. By what year will the land be in pro. tictionV7P'' . - , . „...,4,1,.. ,.. •.,I414.. Iv.. . ,. - • • • ,, r.. ,- • ..• • ..,1,1,.. "'n'....,..*. •;-", ,•4'''',:."..44"C•• ' '1( '..1'.0476'4--;: , ..4 ' . •... c. , . 4,4 r,I., q ,FilAr . . ,. , -"II,. ,,• . . .i. ...• - ''1.4'411 lit101-'... -. .ji'iv , ' i,, ..4 •• B. Residential Use :. ,.. • ''..i.• '''' i 1.. IV.+.. '• ; +" ,:' . ,..,••t•=4,i i ef. '.''!:. ‘iik ,. . • . , k • ; ''.. to . y•'.' . •(... ' ii. :.'':`...f:i• .,':..,t7{''%I.7,t '' •'„?. ., • ''.' V';'i,:%..", k 4....;. • '.."..!..6-•' .1%e'''it'l . 4'.. v'•••,,F0,. 4freikkt* .,4,,,,, .',.. ,.../i, 1 . Si ngl e Family ><Multi Family ..f•-• • " Short la i ;-'4,-:- Sub-Division . •• -,:• --. -!•4:.<' 2. ..t.... it., ,.._ ,„, .,. •, .le...,.,litri.., 'Be ____Short .,,,,,''' Aitr- ;....•,),,.-‘-„,..,. ..,, : ..., . 4,.,'...,:ii,..- i...;.,,t,..,....„ . •It.' ... e A. , f,1 .1 h ' ..00- 44:.e.-•(..'" . ,,..1:-I . 4 •-oq.,,.1,•,v,-,- , . ', •.•',.-,, I., f"v '•..'''.."••' '' ''` VII V.0.yearlyi 1,,41ii '..conY r on ,c, p •E . .....• 0, ,,,,,, •••„.ase„Ar • . ., . .ti ,..,1 iO4 ' • ' ca4 ` -• '•`',, ",,,a..4..,,.. ....,..,:.L.,,..1...;„, ....,.. .• • • • , ,,•.:: -.,s.1;-.•, - ' .-,17,k2.,-•I'f'-'41 ,,,;.1:j.t.'4•..,,', 3. What is the estimated month and yearof home construction? •,• .., •1 - .-2_,...; ,A•••• -.!.„.4.-10.••,1 •. •••,, ',Ja.r.' ' . •,..,W4tittfm;Id. . . , ..:=:'., )'[.;;:..--•'''''''' ...,''.:?.r.. ' ..'! '''',1::.'. ,'"•":'.‘rv.'..” :.. ' "NMPIT,PrrTYRT411 ; '- ''''. **4 1014144EfAMONV*1, rtf)AtAtV61.' '' ', 't,'', ,'. r . .." ,'ri.{‘‘,1-;!' . '", ,-,,:•,., ,,-' ',, ., , ,., ,.,, , :,. , ,,...„ . „,pi 4." eat 'read •ana Comp ete ecLioti • 1 •• ' • :. , 4 . , ,,, ' k.'',',•3, 11+F:: ' '., ' t ..:14e$M,51 ., ' •'' C. Otherc.i..fl'i. .g.tc,,•‘..i.f.0.;,:•,,I,V.: •,4.11.4 : . ' '' .; LtC.4..,,,, . ;,•I,- . •-,14eci,;'2., .4giq•:4 .? ;14: Grayel Pit Industrial Area - Recreation Area 1 .c..,!. :,40.0•)kuo(milerci al Business r • ;.:.f 1 '.../..i'1c..4 ',,..'• 11'4 717-740`;";',Z.f..":1'0ict>s' l''-' i--.tWe•-• ..•A; ' I' ' ,.....‘„! ;!-,'%.,(.11', ..-,, .,e,#••:,.., ,, . Roads for other than forestry purposes ,:• •':•40ther .-•••• -• , ;''t., . ,'•• • ,-.'''• -..e 't...&•• ,sf. .'. . . .;., 1.,;,. 'it..,Piq. ':" •,t,,,..z-; : lc, ....t• , Please read .and,,complete Section D ?-.•!••-•i;i:.4•••• --3.:•.k••,. : • , „•••,-, ., • , *•,144,4,00-- •-• ' • .•• •14, ,eit#., .<,•:-.41 • •• •• • •• • .. . ,. .. • ,...,,;44.4 .t... • -.;..:., :•;•••••• ,• :,,,,-3, D. Other Agency Permits :••••, • - < '4 44,..).1„1 s ,• . ,, ' ). ,'W.'. 't '4• '• ' '4)1.1.04 .7...+.4- ,,,t.• .. • ; '"401" • • '••° „•(. A`.• ' 1 ,,,., • • ...;,..„1 . ,...1.. ..„;.. .,.„,.,..vi..,t...... 1 .r,...Have the appropriate 1 ocal' government developmenperMitsb ,044ppl Jed for?...,/,,..;,:.4..; ;, .,,,,.1••• ,•••q•••••.. • ,•••;.•••'• J0 ' •Nr.r....1.1-Ay • - ,•••;',,.:••'...‘-0.0.-,0,. ...,..4q....off..0 • 4;:t,‘,"..k.i,c,, ,•i ., ,. .-', • ... A!, t. , tViip...g,,,,4,3 t , . 4 illtMrstr 14, ' YES - Permit # and approximate date of .approval .....0.4.t1-`,•;4, el! .,:tp..1. ..?..,.,:.1 t`r '..! ‹..,. . , •, • ••••:,a 4..4,.„,,i , .v...?it,....,, . ,,. •0 ....,,--.,. .4.'11,g,..t.,...+.1,., ( vv., .. ' f A++7 ' • '1 .'1.1i To •CV•ilV .''.(‘';, .'t•:...:1:*1';4.'' A''':1'' 17•''7' . e ••e'llr.f!i,t,',,e,',..,,, ••,4Sfm,F.p., 0-,),.. ,w.•- •., w sp.,, 40. ,.., . .. If the County has required an Environmental Checkist,i,:pgi 1asesubmit;,a of copy- .t 64, .'. 2•, .1 I •t...4'1:1... • 1 ,...J..,.....„1, 4_4,,',0 ',,l CS.'.fl Checklist and County's Declaration with the ForestPractiCeqAppli tion, ...,..tI. , • f 1,r, , .,...,:.',....;t l, ,; -..41.4...:iiti•o'.`..c' 1 ;,;.4; c.';''..:` API.4;. ; .I i...;.,-s• 4 P‘',..'. A. 1'.4''• 34:.;•- • -- .1,.,,.: .,„,p,..A.,..... 4.,,•-' . 1 tiA K A t4; iflitq;.. the app , $.14&.71,1-.;4-4 . Have ropri ate local 1 governpien e deVe401,pment••RermitS•••• yc p .. e - 01. ''' ;4.4* ,1-:,.. •ii ...,..,,..,:.. :',....t.• way:, ,. ••. • ‘,,,.t ..'/3;i• tx .4,1,445,4. o:.4.4 .,. Y.•,1.!,, ,, :, ,.yFrA, ,1,.. , 4 i,4V-14'li - ....."I^4i. 1' NO -..-PleaSe contact,your.•local •rvernmen •• rio to submittitigY" -6 A •4. + - i ./'x ...6 114.afi'14.4i.t•;-,•:41774-7)7,(40 Practice ciApp 1 icatTottPlii,.Un eVtit,A0.t,a%prb..gQX, ..,, o',• 1...,, " kipc,r,0 ,- . ,I.pri,..f.A9Ty.. ,.. ,, • ,' '44,:' .,.,,,..;k is.....' . 1...'J,...: local governlient ,,is the leadI. gericy4fqr-pe‘po a < ul r§ tk,,, io . - - 4,;••v. t .;. - v 4 0• ....•-••I•, ,..., ..4 •••••,41....t. .,', ..I. .' ikild ,. • • .1,t:4•4 '• ii•4 !, '' It' ' '' 't'r ''.11 i'..IV VI:y• • ,, • ,1%A , „:,•';;:*1:'1••1,44/i ,.1,,,i19 le - Pr.,,, ,,,ceittip0. .1 30n,.. a be.•4- .1 -.1.; ,.4. „ ,', - s.; ', 4,4 ,i,-,1.. ,,r,,-, ,,,s.• . 04', •,,..•.-,' ..:1.ri it.r',":' '1' I. l',,4'''t\,,?Olio tt fAVii '.• '• tail 41 ' .S0 . .: '`',''4...:. ;•• .' ;\,i••;,7 • ' '. .' , ' ••'' -“, , ' .. '',.rZ, '''-it•PI S g 1 .. - -k"t., '+.1" •''' .`... . , ,I "11, • ''t .44'4.4`''." 1.i .' ' ''7%.4 - .. ".` ' '' 7‘ . •7"+ ' '7 •''': ;' +.',J...'•1 '' . " : ' + .‘7‘" ' ..4,' , '7',`7'*t". •4'7'r:, '' 6. .ti.1 ,' 1,''4314.k.''.•4(; •,•,:4- ....•`.7..i.":••• ".'-', ..,.,;',N,`R..1."....•. •,:•;''.'?„•,-4,:,f'11..4.,'"::"5...••••••,•,,,•: .;,,,.);',,,,r,.?:::;;:.,.."'f•,;,...^...:',,,:•„,.'••:,,...,-;,:,.'•., , i. ,',9, . . p a .,,.$.11to•;;Itc.1-., 11,11:!. i ..,.., ,.,:et•opttl...p...:Pis.0,1.!4„.;,,..::•1l,q ::.,: .A,Q),,i;o•f . .0.. .:,.... r. ',1tt kli i.t • E•9RE 4 ;.„.it,,,,v.. ,„',+ /74...3,' ,111.;:t.i't'',.. r ...q C.'t„! ,A '.L... ''.; ifi''ilI.t:',:rS:: 114 1.0.00.*voiVAI.•:',.‘,:1,4‘,..01kolg..r..40.0u....,r, ,,,/,,,,,,V1h4F,,I.,:;,i•il ' ''' 't'' ' ' o',, Vi.,s1 6....... 4 :fljhlo : '':'tiitt t 4-' -""-1 . '.• ' f •1 .' ;;',..4. f'.., ..,:r.r..?„,t.).f.ft. c • , +:114',,.;„ • ,.1- ....4c1.,"111“,,,l',-. T ti.•f:t•4',, '4,111?,'.:'.1.'1'.,..!.- ' Rct;i:„., '••• ••4 • '..'.1c,f ..,c,r'47'.4,!,•,..`.;?,. .I. ;4,,c',.4 , ' : ,'',7 ..., •c 4.14e.:74.:-,.1'.„!:lit.i......,:,.i.ril.. ,...f,by,,..(iit::,..,.;',.....,.,,,,, ,(1,1.•41.1.',;;'.7.4';97..".Z.•,'47,7..,"7 j'''''''''''' I'''7!' •"'"),Ai.,',.: 43 )„ 1,,,, -.,7. ' ' ','A r's.:4vt, i' 5';• ,i .'• - '',4 .4 :...i 4 , e :#...,:, ?, !..""I:' -, -;••• ''' , C,,, .', 0. ••• ,1 • ,,..t...r..,-...'.4, 4,., ,.,•-: ,.....•...;,-pti 4 4, •iyA,,L4.4.) ti ' ttii4 4 ,. , '.f.,.. ile, .1,,,, ,,I,., ,P ,j,V. .1; ....449.Ti.., .,1;wa., Lip.....,,%„,41A a..,..,,,r4 -,i!.41-'04 .,..)1`?......::,..,••:'•'.14::t,, i '-C••., •,.. ,• ,'0.' •;' ,-•: ;*••‘44''•Ji•' " ••'' ‘I'lt#i ••• ''''' •'''••''lt.'-'1''••,;"4',' • ••i••‘,'•' ••'. - t&•-.4•••i•'•'). 'Z.,1 Asn''.4.1');(1,1,D.,..iiries,44.1.--1/4%-.-, '.---,•.. ' ., , - -,, • '•!--. •1•••1=;'•4`, ' '' ' e c' ' ' ' -, iA:, ,' .'-" ,.„.. , '..i- . •. (1-41kulairiWttiisiagiaisarn.g4t.Stilir«41.,. ',•: ,,,: ''•••',t ,:....•.? • '' '4 ' '' v ' .,!..,..'h;., „I..' ,'',,O.:1.1A...• '',•,,•iir el '';Crilt;111P-7, 7 f-,i it,d1.. ,,,,-,,,i, ', ... , , . ,,- -., 1,-. ..,,,,.. , .r lc '''', • • • •' '• .t., ' ,,,I,,,,-...•.;:^;,...,,,,,•••..A.,;'‘..„,-;,,,,i,M.,.4,.'.1,..,,, ,,,. , iw,:*:'f',11.,1;;•••„•,,• ;•,,.•., •,,4, ,,. .' ,..,',. ,";.•.1. ,,'- 4*,,,,'•'-•i•e„ J.,0,' )'w If i 1 ' ' 'z,',1::.;,y.'' •WI 0' '••'''',Lir I 4'40,44ft's*N4' 4 11111:"''''"'V'tt. '' k;:.:7:;•.',: .K.. ",r„,,,..; :,,,.•1.,,,:,'.4.',„,.,t, ,,,,,,,,:,,,i. , ,, ,,,..„t ,, i.9,..,..,i t.-;.„r k'':. • , .,,r, ,, 14/... ' 0 l'•.':(4,v,... , ... , o,•,' ;,',.•i'.,:, 1 .4,44,:,,„1,it N J,' 11011 ,,:,‘‘ ' ..' '',$)itf,•'''g,1,.. t i`P e''''ititiqi , 1''' ,, ' ''''' '4''' '' 4.14;i0litte'Z'll;4Aiti Vlir, •1 * VP,OkiF' '.''41 t • ..4;)'Ti.,..'.,''.,,', .,7,4,:y,jc.,.,c." ' 1 • •,,,,:.,..-Il„',, ,. ,,. ,l1 k 1,. ''''r'' ''''. "' '' ' ' '. 1'' '' -'•''' 4''' ', ' '.'''''''''''. '11,•.': r l' '''.''••,•-•••1 iii;...PC t, f; „ tig.,,,,,. ..c.„-s j",*4,..•.,), -0 tlk'6'$.,4- i',,•, !0,,I :7'..?,,,,,',,,'' „. ', * 1..'''''' ' ''''SF, ' 1. ': '4 JO.2:.. •j'.'' it' ' ''''41 ;,*';, l'filk - 1,Y. , • , I 88040 lif Mk•,q,y4...64;oi',..iii.' ., ,;,,...;•a,k •;:„,..4.,-.44if-•••,OA -,i. ,;;,1.i,c,..,•',.„4 •2:,••!;.;,1,..r,1,4 . .t1,,,,,f , ,4t. ..,.,4 -,,..,.. ti ••• 1.... 7: ,4., mdtiit16.044iM,%fflenwl i.f. ..4.04it;....i,iiit;ittAW, As,';'. Aft,',....':1;•,'.k.1)A' 1 .''.., `.k ..;.„.,..' •• ...,.''‘-,P*, .o.T. f[c7D. LEGEMU _ I w • � _•_ _«. ,v„`.*.� Shoreline of statewide i .�� .. ;(."•1+ significance (200' R$Z) w W • y.'4 ... i w o- .A - 1.2.3.4.5 Stream classification +..• G "• I`_' Shoreline of state (type 1) 6 i I �••Y^ �--3� Stream indication ...... ..... ..e'-.7 •• I •• I •• : Termination of stream class ••. r "• I-.. •• 1 ••• i »• ■ Existing building ... ...I: .. ...a.. "'•".. .. I .. s/- Gravel pit «• ` »• .. .. .. w_ ----.__--- Powerline • ••T.. SW,. •S[CT,O.. ..[ ------ B �! - ----L;• • -- \Ir ail A it; • x \,s\..• .14p' N\ Itikii • • • _girt. .. .... ti .r I 4. N -41 LAKE - WASH I N GTON f"y•) •* • \ . ‘49.4.10011 ei.___... ....1---- — • 01 •. \ • *IL I 41 of\.1 Jill . ,f- \ • • • • )r „. ,,,,,,n Mawr % c:5,__ / . , k i ; 1 _ 116, r I 1.--:. I+ • t )�. 1 • • • • • LINCOLN PROPERTY COMPANY N.C., INC. AND AFFILIATED COMPANIES LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL TO: Department of Natural Resources DATE: 10/15/90 P.O. Box 68 Enumclaw, WA 98022 RE: RENTON FOREST PRACTICES PERMIT WE ARE SENDING„YOU L3E7 ATTACHED / / UNDER SEPARATE COVER, THE FOLLOWING: COPIES DATED DESCRIPTION 1 FOREST PRACTICE PERMIT APPLICATION J / FOR YOUR USE /-7 FOR YOUR SIGNATURE / I FOR YOUR INFORMATION / / FOR YOUR APPROVAL / / AS REQUESTED r-7 FOR YOUR COMMENTS REMARKS: If you have questions or need additional information, please contact me at 455-4813. Sincerely yours, • olio Quinn Vice President/ • 1745 114th Avenue S.E. Suite 100 Bellevue, WA 98004 (206)455-4813 FAX: (206)451-8469 • • RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT The subject property is currently under consideration for Rezone/PUD approval by the City of Renton. A draft EIS has been prepared. It' is anticipated that a building permit could issue in the spring of 1991 and construction would commence in the summer of 1991. The property is approximately 24 acres. Approximately.8.3 acres of the Site vegetate will be • removed and 4.2 acres of these acres will be'relandscaped. • 9 l • • • 1 ' OWNERSHIP/LEGAL DESCRIPTION ' I. PAULINE KIRKMAN 1002 N. 35TH ST. RENTON, WA 98056 II. THOMAS COOKE 651 STRANDER BLVD. #100 r SEATTLE, WA 98188 III. NANCY LOTTO/JOYCE SEGUR 15706 SE 160TH PL. RENTON, WA 98058 IV. TORU MATSUOKA 5150 S. ORCAS ST. SEATTLE, WA 98118 V. J.S. MARTINDALE 9712 - 237 PLACE S.W. EDMONDS, WA 98020 • • • 4' 1 • • • • • • • • LEGAL DESCRIPTION I. KIRKMAN PARCEL A: • THAT PORTION OF THE RIGHT OF. WAY 200. 00 FEET IN WIDTH DELINEATED ON C.D HILLMAN'S LAKE WASHINGTON GARDEN OF EDEN DIVISION NO. 5, ACCORDING TO T. PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLR E 11 OF PLATS,LYING BETWEENPTHE •53 , IN WESTERLYING COUNTY, PRODUCTION 0 WASHINGTON, AS "C AND 'P.S.R. . THE NORTH LINE OF TRACT 322 OF SAID PLAT AND THE WESTERLY PRODUCTION OF THE SOUTH LINE OF TRACT 317 OF SAID PLAT, AND LYING WESTERLY OF STATE HIGHWAY 405. • EXCEPT THAT PORTION LYING BETWEENTHE EASTERLY PRODUCTION OF THE NORTH, , LINE OF TRACT 350 OF SAID PLAT AND THE WESTERLY PRODUCTION OF THE SOUTH • LINE OF TRACT ' 317 OF SAID PLAT;• EXCEPT THAT PORTION LYING BETWEEN THE WESTERLY PRODUCTION OF THE NORTH LINE OF TRACT 322 OF SAID PLAT AND THE WESTERLY PRODUCTION OF THE SOUTH LINE ;OF TRACT 319 OF SAID PLAT; PARCEL B: THAT PORTION OF TRACT 319, "C.D. HILLMAN'S LAKE WASHINGTON GARDEN OF... EDE2 DIVISION NO. 5, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF .RECORDED IN VOLUME 11 OF PLATS, PAGE 83 , IN KING COUNTY,' WASHINGTON, LYING WESTERLY OF STATE HIGHWAY NO. 405 , AND THAT PORTION OF PACIFIC COAST RAILROAD RIGHT OF WA`. LYING ADJACENT. THERETO WEST OF STATE HIGHWAY NO. 405 ; • PARCEL C: THAT PORTION OF TRACT 320, C.D. HILLMAN'S LAKE WASHINGTON GARDEN OF EDE/ DIVISION NO. 5, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 11 OF PLATS, PAGE 83 , IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, LYING WESTERLY OF STATE HIGHWAY NO. 405, AND THAT PORTION OF,'PACIFIC COAST RAILROAD RIGHT OF WA1 LYING ADJACENT THERETO WEST OF STATE, HIGHWAY NO. 405; ,: PARCEL D: THAT. PORTION OF TRACTS 321 AND 322 , C.D. HILLMAN'S LAKE WASHINGTON GARDEN OF EDEN DIVISION NO. 5', ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED' IZ VOLUME 11 OF PLATS, PAGE 83 , IN KING, COUNTY, WASHINGTON, LYING WESTERLY OF STATE HIGHWAY NO. 44,05, AND THAT PORTION OF PACIFIC ",COAST RAILROAD , RIGHT- OF WAY, . LYING, ADJACENT THERETO, WEST. OF STATE HIGHWAY NO. 405; • • PARCEL E: • TRACT 348 OF C.D. HILLMAN'S LAKE WASHINGTON GARDEN OF 'EDEN NO. 5,' ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME al OF PLATS, PAGE 83, 3 KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; PARCEL F: • ' • TRACT 351, C.D. HILLMAN'S LAKE WASHINGTON GARDEN OF EDEN, DIVISION NO. ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 11 OF PLATS, PAGE 83 , I KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; EXCEPT THE WESTERLY 60 FEET THEREOF CONDEMNED' IN -KING, COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT CAUSE NUMBER 115311 FOR RENTON-NEWPORT ROAD'. ' • • • LEGAL DESCRIPTION II. COOK PARCEL A: TRACT 3)4 , C. D. HILLMAN'S. LAKE WASHINGTON GARDEN OF EDEN ADDITION TO SEATTLE DIVISION NO. FIVE, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 11 OF PLATS, PAGE 83, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; EXCEPT THAT PORTION THEREOF LYING EASTERLY OF THE WESTERLY MARGIN, OF PRIMARY STATE HICHWAY NO. 1 (SR 405) A8 ESTABLISHED BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 4683135. PARCEL B: • TRACT 3)5, C. D. HILLMAN'S LAKE WASHINGTON GARDEN OF EDEN ADDITION TO . SEATTLE DIVISION NO. FIVE, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 11 OF PLATS, PAGE 83, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; EXCEPT THAT PORTION THEREOF LYING EASTERLY OF THE WESTERLY MARGIN OF PRIMARY STATE HIGHWAY NO. 1 (SR 405) AS ESTABLISHED BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 4682225; TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF THE PACIFIC COAST RAILROAD COMPANY'S • • NEWCASTLE BRANCH RIGHT OF WAY, BEING A STRIP OF SAID RIGHT OF WAY 200 FEET IN WIDTH, 100 FEET OF SUCH WIDTH LYING ON EITHER SIDE OF THE CENTERLINE OF SAID RIGHT OF WAY, AS THE SAME WAS LOCATED ON OCTOBER 15, 1946 AND BOUNDED ON THE NORTH BY THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF TRACT 333, C. D. HILLMAN'S LAKE WASHINGTON GARDEN OF EDEN ADDITION TO SEATTLE DIVISION NO. FIVE, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUXZ 11 OF PLATS, PAGE 83, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, PRODUCED WESTERLY OVER AND ACROSS SAID RIGHT or WAY, AND ON THE SOUTH BY THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF TRACT 336 OT SAID PLAT, PRODUCED WESTERLY OVER AND ACROSS SAID RIGHT OF WAY; ' EXCEPT THAT PORTION THEREOF LYING EASTERLY OF THE WESTERLY MARGIN OT PRIMARY STATE HIGHWAY 'HO. 1 (SR 405) AS ESTABLISHED BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 4648616. PARCEL C: • THAT PORTION OF THE PACIFIC COAST RAILROAD COMPANY'S RIGHT OF WAY IN SECTION 5, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN RING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, LYING BETWEEN THE NORTH AND SOUTH MARGINS OF THIRD AVENUE, EXTENDED TO THE WEST, AS DELINEATED OH C. D. NILL4AN'S LAZE WASHINGTON GARDEN OF EDEN ADDITION TO SEATTLE DIVISION NO. FIVE, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF: RECORDED IN VOLUME 11 OF PLATS, PAGE 83, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, AND LYING WESTERLY OF A LINE DRAWN PARALLEL WITH AND 180 FEET WESTERLY, WHEN MEASURED RADIALLY, IRON THE LINE OF SURVEY OF 5R 405, RENTON TO KENNYDALE. • LEGAL DESCRIPTION III. .LOTTO/SEGUR LOTS 352 AND 353 , C. D. HILLMAN' S LAKE WASHINGTON GARDEN OF EDEN DIVISION NO. 5 , ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 11 OF PLATS, PAGE 83 , IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; EXCEPT THAT PORTION THEREOF CONVEYED TO KING COUNTY FOR NEWPORT-RENTON . ROAD BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 1036529 . LEGAL DESCRIPTION • IV. NIATSUOKA LOT 344 HILLMANS LK WN GARDEN OF EDEN 115 LY WLY OF ST HWY NO 2-A TGW POR OF PC R/W IN SW 1/4 OF SEC 05-23-05 ADJ LY BTW N & S LNS SD TR 320 PROP WLY • • • • • • • • • • • • LEGAL DESCRIPTION. • • V. MARTINDALE • Legal description of property (if more space Is required, pieta attach a aspirate sheet). , PARCEL A TRACT 349 C. D. HILLMAN'S LAKE WASHINOTON GARDEN OF EDEN DIVISION NUMBER 5 ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF PECORDED IN VOLUME 11 OF PLATS. PAGE e3. IN KINO COUNTY. WASHINOTON, TOCETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF VACATED 104TH AVENUE SOUTHEAST (LAKE VIEW BOULEVARD). VACATED BY THE CITY OF RENTON UNDER ORDINANCE NUMBER 29511. THAT WOULD ATTACH THERETO BY OPERATION OF LAW' • TOGETHER WITH AN EASEMENT FOR INOR&SS ARO EGRESS OVER THE SOUTH 50 FEET OF TRACT 351 C. SAID PLAT. PARCEL B TRACT 350 C. D. HILLMAN'S LAKE WASHINGTON GARDEN OF EDEN DIVISION NUMBER 3 ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 11 OF PLATS. PAGE 83. IN KINO COUNTY. WASHINGTON. • TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF VACATED 104TH AVENUE SOUTHEAST (LAKE VIEW BOULEVARD) VACATED BY THE CITY OF RENTON UNDER ORDINANCE NUMBER 2958. THAT WOULD ATTACH THERETO BY OPERATION OF LAW. PARCEL C TRACTS 343 AND 346 C. D. HILLMAN'S LAKE WASHTNGTON'OARDEN OF EDEN DIVISION NUMBER S ACCORDINO TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME '1I OF PLATS. PACE 83. IN KING COUNTY. WASHINGTON, • TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF VACATED 104TH AVENUE SOUTHEAST (LAKE VIEW • • BOULEVARD). VACATED BY THE CITY OF•RENTON UNDER ORDINANCE NUMBER 4029. THAT WOULD ATTACH THERETO BY OPERATION OF LAW. AS SAID PROPERTY IS DEPICTED ON KIND COUNTY SURVEY RECORDED UNDER RECORD,INO NUMBER 8506249011 AND DESCRIBED BY KING COUNTY BOUNDARY LINE AGREEMENT RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 8306240829. 'PARCEL D . THAT PORTION cr THE RIGHT OF WAY Z00.00 FEET IN WIDTH DELINEATED ON C.D. • HILLMAN'S LAKE WASHINGTON GARDEN OF EVEN DIVISION NUMBER 5. ACCORDING. TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME II OF PLATS. PAGE 93. IN KING COUNTY. WASHIH01ON. AS "C AND P. S.R. R.• LYINO BETWEEN THE EASTERLY PRODUCTION OF THE NORTH LINE OF TRACT 350 OF SAID PLAT AND THE WESTERLY • PRODUCTION OF THE SOUTH LINE OF TRACT 317 OF SAID PLAT) EXCEPT THAT PORTION THEREOF CONVEYED TO THE STATE OF WASHINGTON FOR • HIGHWAY PLIIPOSES BY DEEDS RECORDED UNDER RECORDING MUMDERS' 4668942 AND 6014874. AFFIDAVIT • • • lamps Mart 1 ndi LP , being duly sworn, declare that I am (please check one) the authorized representative to act for the property owner, X the owner of the property involved In this application and that the foregoing statements and answers bean contained and the information herewith submitted are In.all respects true and correct to the bat of my knowledge and belief. SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS . 9th DAY OF October 19 89 . ' • • NOTARY PUBLIC 1N AND FOR THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, RESIDING AT:- Issa u b. W•ashinuton 98027 I • ly • • ( -o Notary Public) Gregg C. MacDonald' (S nature of Owner) )., CY? 17 7 'N'7 n . 6t • • • • • • • , .a.,/ I Bluffs ETB 541.04/45/33. 135 • 4 •- - y T STATE OF. WASHINGTON . . FOREST PRACTICES ' DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL. RESOURCES • ..APPLICATION/NOTIFICATION. .TOTE TO APPLICANT: Read but DO NOT write In shaded areas. Complete Items 1-18..Us• additional.sheets as needed.. • SHUTDOWN ZONE -• bUIRN..1 T LOM DATE AELa./VEO 0._•�'o� OAtk DUE t APPLICATION/NOTIFICATION ' • !CHECK BOX.FOR ANY REQUEST YOU HAVE. NOTE UPLAND MANAGEMENT AREAS,AND RIPARIAN MANAGEMENT ZONES. REQUESTS REQUESTS FP APPLICATION RENEWAL NO. %�DELAYED EFFECTIVE GATE REOVEstFD APPROVAL DATE HYDRAULIC PROJECT APPROVAL ❑ '' ALTERNATE RMZ PLAN O' FOREST PRACTICE ASSISTANCE 0 PRE-FILING REVIEW 0 LANDOWNER WANTS FOREST MANAGEMENT ASSISTANCE ❑ • . DATA UPLAND MANAGEMENT AREAS 0 NOs. ACRES HARVESTING OLD GROWN 0 . • RIPARIAN MANAGEMENT WATER TYPE NO. UNITS LINEAL FEET STREAM 0 SIDE(S)0 or, s❑ POND/LAKE/BAY 0 ZONES (RMZ) BY: WATER TYPE NO. UNITS LINEAL FEET STREAM 0, SIDE(S)0 or O POND/LAKE/BAY 0 WATER TYPE . NO. UNITS LINEAL FEET STREAM 0 SIDE(S)0 orp POND/LAKE/BAY 0 (ALSO SHOW UPLAND MANAGEMENT AREAS AND RIPARIAN MANAGEMENT ZONES ON.MAP) ti..a ...•... • Y.:.L raft OSiliiNA•. OINWTIOl1 IN PlIgme= INK. 4S:. •:':i.:•••.: ` '!t(.;:.:'ra:s),�•�)..Qea;iL ';�.�r,�.;,.�ji.�, ,o:...lf�OtB�,. � ' I. NAME OF OPERATOR 2.NAME OF LANDOWNER L NAME OF TIMBER TAXPAYER (TIMBER OWNER) Lincoln Property Company See attached Exhibit A ' ADDRESS LESS t ADDRESS 1745 114th Ave. SE #100 Exhibit A • • CITY STATEZIP CITY • STATE- ZIP • CITY STATE ZIP • Bellevue, WA 98004'' TELEPHONE NUMBER TELEPHONE NUMBER TELEPHONE NUMB R (206, ) 455-4813 • ( • ) ' 4. TIMBER.TAXPAYER FULL LEGAL NAME TIMBER TAX REGISTRATION NO. S. COUNTY Lincoln Property Company N.C. , Inc. 800-017-564• King TYPE OF LEGAL ENTRY � SS IDENTIFIER e. WITHIN CITY LIMITS? NO 0 YES IV SOLE OWNER 0 PARTNERSHIP 0 CORPORATION t OTHER 0 600-375-370 LANO FLATRTEo AFTERt JAN. I. 1960(INCLUDES CALL.•1.600 646 TTAX FOR TAX NUMBER OR TAX NFORMATION7 SHORT PLATS) • 6, IN PUBLIC PARK OR WITHIN 600 FT (e.g.PORT. CITY COUNTY.STATE.FED.PARK) (CONTACT CO. ASSESSOR FOR VERIFICATION) NO 0 YES ] PARK NAME: Gene Coulon Park NO 0 YES )� .r..:g4-;: .:.. -x+•1•• 4 'r..�kyeg w; 10. SLOPE CONDITION &PERCENT ION.OF'OPERATIOlK81' UD[PAF •1 i.OR TAX LW"-.a� �.SNP' RGE.tlf1M UNSTABLE 0 O.LE F.CONVERSI(N OR.tP pLATTEQ-;��"-•:�; .r•V.hr F,:. :••tt�M C>" yi• Ct�f ? �. -' NUMBER yr Y HIGHLY ERODIBLE 0 • A ' STEEPEST 10% OR SIGNIF. PART• llo % OF.OPERATION AREA' B. See 'attached. legal AVERAGE SLOPE 17 % • c. Exhibit B .• it START DATE . END DATE (SHOW ON YAP) ' FED. THREAT. AND ENDANG. SPECIES OR CRITICAL W1LDLWE HABITAT:NAME )' ins. '-: -fr...r....: .t . • OPA1111TOIF AWDrtt Os EQUWI ENT 148.ROAD I '4•ST•VOU)ME TO BF CUT .y• `�2 TY 5O OPE7i ��s�.� �i� Vi Ylll.lil8TFR7D OP 11A Ik'ATICIN A.TOTAL 8.PERCENT y.. A IAAPT«6.4< +r I-, ti►'yt'::410:. 'fitiG•' UItg°bf101fI*R"'11A1 rll' O�itATKIN ,IALETT_=.?? U1L30 aIKSV1l Oft ;4 i. r.s•y ,� a,' � s / t'o' • • 30% A Land Clearing Associated - • . B-with residential development • • ' ROAD ABANDONMENT PROPOSED/PLANNED FOLLOWING COMPLETION OF OPERATION NO ❑ ' YES ❑- • (SHOW'ON MAP) 18..LOCATION ce.v fiIlT.O1tWATERr(TM Si ON on yp)H!i'414 TALE'OF TFi •1,,, +pr'Washing'td. •-� •'^ii • PLAN FOR ROAD CONSTRUCTION OR IMPROVEMENTS OR HARVEST OF 30%OR MORE OF VOLUME IS WITHIN A FT.OF SHORELINE OF THE STATE Cl OR SHORELINE IN OF STATEWIDE SIGNIFICANCE 0 (WATER TYPES I AND.+I.CONTACT LOCAL GOVT.POP FORMATION), . ,r i Il . • N. 26th St. . . N.26th St. ` N.24th St. i N.E. 24th St. \% • VVV ) . HVVH a 10 N O ,$) ... . . 7 L Ts 11 0 N.E.20th St. • LAKE II WASHINGTON 1 111/,/ ' • Z 111 N.E. 16th St. ai T d d� 47 a)GENE 44101 COULON N.E.14th St. g MEMORIAL, BEACH PARK N.E.1111 ".......4 . • 12th St. r . . . Q,,,,O`. 1 sa , ,,.. LEGEND .Site nil . , , , 405 North NOT TO SCALE lig , . ' . . A . , , , . Figure 2 • Vicinity Map '.,.. 2-3 I . tIIP . s..•I,to; '•,...," .....1:., ... 8. INTERSTATE 405 se .. ... •:- - ts....,-".;.100•°` ' 4"1- - . ..• ..• ••• OH . .....I •••••'.--..... ,-...ENAPMF11..i'..:-..:1—••••••••......-:.:-.. •i"• • . TS& no. ••• ' IN ' •' . • • •,--••••,..r.4.91"P "- .s ,•-....x,..........P., J ..•./.• . .-.01.40 ' • 1''.-11- .•. --:- ,t....1,- '-'-"•••••-:'I•':/•‘;`="A•v•••'•! •••-•*".:. •r 7.•''' .. •'' • ' -- • "tgol'''•-•‘' '" - • .v,—,--:•%,--'- II.-- - • - '..s.,.= n 7r, ‘-• 4... .-...:- ,...e.,....-•• ".... ,..sr,,44.. 0,,::.4.,•: ci,.-.. . ...,.:•,.st..4 . .-z4...-it.%,,......-!..;...„-„44...14,11%,.1 ; .,.....,-., ,,_ :;,....‘,,,,......t.. . ,ommovi mow. ... st_elom, .,..p,et.5-e,-;:.;..:-.._,:::—,:::,,.....::-..:‘,•27.r,L.?1:47:17;::..:.r..:-.: :7.1._ .,e _ 1 , • .0 • • . " ,•-:- ... • - ' —'''.:-..:::: • .'•':';'.••••; gh, es 0 .. , ."2.'e k . — ",...,...!;.;;;%..•c•..;1.7., '., . ..•-- ._ •-••••• is •-•"' .r-tl• ::.:a...._..,. .. ••••••i•:: :'..:,--...i's• .......:.'r,:.:.:'...'....:.:•.- • ..-/ ,a,---,••••-___f• 4, ••.. .. ..„........ . .. ......, ....,....,....„...... . ., ‘ 0 -4,.....___:-..„.e .. .,:...ir .400 ,---1,1,4 , _ r:,,,, ....-.. .............„..2,.......,.:.r..,......„.., ....;. ... 6. ., o 1,513,7•11.10' 1411•A Y ' i t• • ow-. . -,.21 . iNillik;„..A• C.)...'• •,,,),,,.;,* ‘ .,.!..:,*••••''. .••0,..:".'•••,' ' .2.. _ _, •• ' • • ,. t.•• . e • N,;• •, - I —...._.- -.....: .., -is: •,.. , .- , ..;:, aae •r.'st•••••iz..-. '') % . ."•!:''''4' •• ...'••-•.' '--•' —— .., --- -.••• yr . --.....,..... •• .. •••. .. .e. ! . , . t.. • . .., . . $ ...-*.ILs.---.1z,.%' t..... • s , ••• :•••. ./k ... , • cb ....i ...... • ..1 ) ..,‘,...•-•-:...-A:...: •14..:.,,, . . ... I . e.....* 'Ire:cc....41.-",i,.1..--•••4... /,' • •• ' -.t i I .. 4-*...(Ps: • •:,. . .,,, . „.. , .1 • • fb.''`.;..;'. ......; .% ------ - i '1',..it.., .a,••...r./4.,'1.14,P.4(c.......""J.:alip. . , .. • ,. -,....., . '. .%' •. .,' •+..s,• --.,,:,-,... •'i..., 1 « ''.,s' tt-Y•.'A....)C 4...' .-e..:,;.* ••, f.t..,... . ''''• .'"...- C '"4*•rf....::-'n,-.........,....''.......11.'..... • •f'.."-''.4%(.1 r -t .Q --'.. ..,... - , --:t-iiiiiideallikk. ,.g.... , ..... •4 ...',/,'"...'5%,4.k.,`,,..°,t..7-, • 6 4'‘A•-• ' : •..'-1-''''''...' •.i '-'. ' '. '`.-.''''Ni, --1's.-'' -..,.;•‘'.r.•''c'''-',1,:,.. -td-'?Pi:i,... 4,4*-'•• ".,'..-- •. -- .-- - _ ..:,,t, .,...%,-.,,,,.....,i_,:.,...,,•—, . ...--,..,:....._:•Ar-pt,t...-.• • • , _ . .,_. ..„::•,-....., ••• .-.,-,. -...„...„..,....- .,--,••Nok,.,, ,,,-..,-.. ...-_.::--,-...,.1*..,.,•,,,,,,,,\•,::::, :•,..,.•••::.•r.,.... :.,• _•-.--• -. _ .. .. • •. .••• . • . .. . . ..,,,, . , , . . •I'VeIttilfr.*W•1,k,:41...,'I ikr' •.:1 - . ,.:*; . ... • - .:7"2:-•.- •.1'.......,' ', -• ••••*.f?‹:4,,tajv .h.'1,.»...i417.4-51...:-..v.:k•:::-...1.'•.--.'-' - •• . • - •1,.....• ....t../,.'• AI. : .. ../ •'' . ...ie. s-.1.1.. ..t... •-: '''r.4.t:: :...yr,.;,...11: ,-,1......' ••• -' .6.-r`,1C,c ..',...",*4/.4 (0'‘"\ TIN cgs.- - '% • • ••, te- .4P• ' 0 \ . ...1 ••••• •le's)flicvn";--;•,.--:-.'..•• .. .• •. •et • •I.,-, - V‘41-.'"kor i..".-:' %,-.7....t... . si., ..• • ..IPP.r.••••0-,•;:'.7,.. .."....:-40''''*:-:. '''..)4 . . - 40 ".; • .....•.:)...4'..:.i... .../..?„,.......„ 4„,'''Itk,"*...Z.,:4*' - 1 ,r.,s-^' - r • . s.....i. . ,. - -- -- -.),i) : • .. ,; ••- , ,;;..; • -;:i •.. -,f 1. . 'brION‘k .i. .-•f•li- 1•1.....f • - -41k, •. ...• ,,_-.4"1/4t.:4,:,..t.Vid":-,„,., ' .4_ ••-ir . - ' ' ..- ..- . ...•. .../...; .40-4:.•)••.1',..,•4:•••:.7e7:74•A••• .• -- "" •••••••••'.-i........"•?.'"),' '••• • I'' ''''••••-,, • .-,_Ar^t...,•, c2A) • . - .•N_ ""•..-••.-• •l''•*kr..•4.-a‘,.:.•--A..".w e...wM:.%N.t.,...-.•'•••.,.,.i••"•.1..:...'...,.*?:..•0,.....,”1,:441 e.041.1.' .A'!4T•'•A 1..''.-,..7•..'1,1'.v...1•,!-.....•.••,;^.*S-1n-i -p‘'.(,0,:)L 2,12•:1:.'::,,_,,,, -..--,‘1,._).•• I14 . 1 ' 0 e.. _V1•e4.•_.).4'-,•`‘•.e-•.(/.•' •.•.)(..c1.- ,•'•'••_. .I „ Lr " . JJ, - ' . - .. ''N'4,"''eE•t.,,.,I.'-.'..N-;,S. *•`4'•..•.\,S..:G;-0-•1.•-0•0,1".1.4t":::-•9•-%•° -•,,.-.)L•,'I'!-.-•.•,•.'•:''-',•:,,•;1•%1,4-1;`'q•,-4; 1.:41.,-0 t1f-..,,4.",1,'1•,,..•).;!1,•.);,."-,J'T-:. •. ) & ., • ,...;..?--•.-:.1,.y.'-".—.a-7-e.-...-t'--,- ..i.,i:..l...,..f.0.,,..,.-'i.G•E t i'.'f. •• 0CA'O‘.0t1•4.o9'f'-µ..-0 0-••iL es 1.0• .4 P•1°"'.. . . .. '..- • •"/ ,...•••••4:-.....%•" ..'/•:.,. ;$ .'1 Ci ."; I . ) - ...,-. . --•-•'•-1-' .••••••11' .,--- ' . . • .- . • - - • . „• . 5,.,r. -,. , . ... : -- .• .•••-•••• . ' . •. ' , \ . • . • . .•,, .. • \ \ '1 . .. ...„, . • . ! . •.• LAKE WASHINGTON • \, e....- - • ... t • . . . _ . . _ , - -•-••-- • . ......J..7 NORTH 0 200 500 , LINCOLIT PP . -r-- _ . . . . -. • - -. MILBRANDT ARCHITECTS . . f , . E !_ • • 3EC TWP RGE CONTROL NO TF' NAME ' • DESCRIPTION LOC/CODE LOCATION WATER SOURCE TRIBUTARY TO: >5 23 050E , G1-*0=040 G1*O3O40C MU 17 SE4NW4 WELL ! • )5 23 i)=f)E G1_-*O ;: . 9 r_r1*0809C MU 17 SE4NW4 WELL. . i5 23 050E S1-:*02654 S1 *O 'r,54C HE • 17 SW4SW4 LK WASHINGTON LK UNION :)- 23 000E S1-*0475 51*04793C DS ST IR 17 "GL1 , UNN 'STR • Lk-. WASHINGTON . _)5 27, 050E S1 -*1.11.b0 s.1.*111.i)c IR 17 TR285 GDN EDEN D I V4 . UNN STR Lk; WASHINGTON . _)5 23 050E S1-*1.4474 S1*14474C ST IR . 17 TR293 GDN EDEN 4. UNN STR • Lk; WASHINGTON :)5 27. 050E S1--00150 S1-001.50C ' FS 17 NW4 UNN STR LK WASHINGTON _) ; 23 050E S1--2321.E S1-2321SC RS IR 17 LT-9 ELDON ACRES ADD UNN STR LK WASHINGTON i , 23 050E 05-fl00005 RENTON CITY LIMITS. CITY OF RENTON 17 • i, PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF RENTON JUL 1 6 EDEIVED1990 July 12, 1990 City of Renton Municipal Building 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 Attention: Mr. Don Erickson RE: The Bluffs' Draft EIS Dear Mr. Erickson: I have recently been informed that the question of access along Meadow Avenue through the residential neighborhood north of The Bluffs, was questioned again at the public hearing of July 3, 1990. Furthermore, I understand that the responsible Official responded that this access is for emergency vehicles only. However, I understand that it remains unclear as to whether this statement remains accurate when applied to the Alternatives reviewed in the DEIS. I hope you are able to clarify this issue in your final comments. Bes egards, ichard L. Wag er, AIA RLW:amp i,1 - -yam • THE BLUFFS-PUBLIC COMMENT IDA WOODEN 3901 PARK AVE N RENTON,WA 98056 My main objection to the whole project is the traffic. We have lots of traffic. If you think it doesn't come up Lake Washington Boulevard, it does. The stench from the freeway on one side of us and Lake Washington Boulevard on the other side, the smell of the fumes from automobiles is to the point where you cannot open your windows in the night or in the early morning, or if you do open them at night, you get up and close them in the early morning because of the carbon monoxide fumes and if anybody thinks 1,000 cars a day more on Lake Washington Boulevard and on the freeway isn't going to make a lot of difference,they're wrong, because it is. GEORGE SPENCER 1809 JONES AVE NE RENTON,WA 98056 I think I'm here -I'm more concerned probably-with the idea of the height and I think some of that solved here. It won't be any higher than what the existing trees are now which block you for a view to the lake. I'm more concerned, I think,with that and also, like Ms.Wooden said, In regards to the traffic down on the lower Lake Washington Boulevard, I realize now it's only about 25 mile an hour, they had to slow that up, but traffic will be unbearable if this construction goes through. I'm quite positive on that. JOAN JENSEN 2721 MEADOW AVE N RENTON,WA I'm really against this whole project. Point 1 - I like owner, I want some more owner occupied housing in that area rather than rental property. Secondly, I think that they made mistakes in there and they said it's not tall but I read that they're suppose to be 35 feet or something and that these all came out at 39 feet, which to me,that's four feet too many. What other ones? Traffic-I hate the idea of traffic and I don't want it, even an emergency road coming through up on Meadow. That road has to be widen and there's no way to widen it, and the corners have to widened on 28th because we almost have accidents there everyday now. CHALMER H. BOLEN 2712 MEADOW AVE N RENTON,WA Basically, I do have some questions about this document. Where it talks about the Bluffs down there in the references for the principal contributors of the EIS is suppose to be identified, immediately following the reference section, I can't find them in here. And I can't find where the architect is referenced and as for the height of this, a four-story building, basically, you would have to figure about 40 feet because of the area between the floors. That's not counting the roofs, so I think that the height that they're talking about is a little off schedule. There are some other things In here that I have some questions about also. He explained about how the density's calculated here, so that part of it is answered already. The movement of the materials for the grading of this material, regardless of how gentle they try to be, is going to involve quite a few cubic yards of material and that's going to tie up quite a bit of traffic down there just while s. they're doing the grading and leveling into an area which the Lake Washington Boulevard, by its,very nature, has to lay between a railroad right-of-way and where these properties are at and of course,,they can't blame closer to railroad right-of-way because of the grade fall off and at the back of this property next to the freeway, they're going to have to allow a particular grade, otherwise the soil will move. They can't get but just so close to the freeway otherwise the soil will move and that soil will move when it gets wet. That's the nature of it. I think the 88,000 cubic yards of total grading anticipated, I think that might be a little bit on the underside, because they're going to find when they get into there that the terrain is a little rougher than what they expect. The intersection studies that they had for the intersection by the Boeing plant. That is a pretty sharp corner there, they can only travel about so far so fast in that area to make that legal. As far as for going north, that's going to be counterproductive for anybody that want's to travel north because of the speed limits that's Involved. In the evenings when they were coming from the north, that would be only time that would be to their advantage because of the S-curve tie-ups that we have and they haven't been able to get that straightened out yet and nobody knows exactly when that is going to be completed. So that's'going to be here for some time because where I've lived there now for 23 years, they were working on the 405 when I came here and they're still working on it and they're losing ground. So, I don't hold out too much hope for that. My main concern in this main project was that access road out of there on the east side of this up to where it would come down through Meadow Avenue, up in that area. One of the reasons why a lot of people bought into that area to begin with was because it was dead end street and there wasn't any through traffic to endanger the lives of the children and families that happen to be coming around there and since there are no sidewalks there, they almost have to walk on the edge of the street and of course, they're going to be walking on people's yards. So the extra traffic coming down through there wouldn't be to anybody's advantage. There's a few other things in here that are of minor concern. The heights of those trees up there and the height of the 4 and 5-story buildings. I understand it would be to their advantage to have too many apartments above the level of the freeway, so that's going (unintelligible) because the sound would degrade the value of the apartments so that's a limiting factor as well as the area they've bought into evidently. So the traffic, as far as the building of the buildings are, think I'll be more concerned with the traffic than anything else. The value of what they're going to be charging to rent these properties seems to rule out a great deal of concern I had about the type of people who might move into those apartments because people who are going to be paying that much money is not going to be wanting to tear them up like some of the apartments I've seen. -The Bluffs/Public Comment-2- 1:27,G46.64 _ E7E1S 4/e--41-7-1-\) PART OF _Juf2-(1 � A134__ ._.. ..._..,_.-..- ` ._.: - --��� ...__....._.T...._.. __._...._...._..._.. ._......_..._.2L. P �. &)4ahti 3 f o% frft,e/'b f g rto s SsA tit spElAcE12 1 20 9 r o14 P vEP1E 1?OS� c-lam.--! he( PA 7'. t M.ems, Fero 314 y - -/14: /1/-- - 'a-11- ij fi (1. li it z fJ • THE BLUFFS-PUBLIC COMMENT DARRYL INGELMUND 3602 LK WASH BLVD N RENTON,WA I'm speaking tonight as the president of the North Renton Kenneydale Defense Fund and the Defense Fund is a nonprofit organization whose purpose is to raise monies to protect the single-family character of certain areas of North Renton and Kenneydale and we've been somewhat effective in doing that. And there have been many impacts. There have been two major office structures built by Gene Horbauck;there's the major plant expansion that Boeing is proposing, although its been somewhat pared back, but not significantly; and there is the eventual dispensation of the PACCAR site. So there's a lot going on in the North Renton Kenneydale area and certainly this piece of land and this proposed rezone is just one of many things, that individually or in total, severely impact residential areas. Now we have no quarrel with people wanting to make a maximum amount of money off the land. We think that's fine. We think you should try and make as much money as you can, but you're also going to get significant opposition from people that live there and who are trying to protect their property interest. In this particular case here, we think this is totally inappropriate to that site and for you fellows to come in and build that crap as apartments and then leave, I think is totally unacceptable. No where in this document is there any balance shown at all between what currently exist in Kenneydale and what is proposed. In fact, I doubt if the City has spent 10 minutes reviewing this document. I called and asked if somebody could tell me where the residential area starts and nobody could tell me that. I called and asked, this northern access road that is shown in some of the alternatives, whether that was for emergency use only or traffic passing through the existing neighborhoods and nobody could tell me that. So any indication on the City's part that they've had any kind of interaction in this document is totally false. So it should be thrown out 'cuz this is not a City document. This is nothing but a sales pitch from a developer to make a lot of money at the expense of not only the people living there, but Coulon Park, which is a significant investment that all of us in Renton have made, and personally and the organization is appalled that the City of Renton can violate the trust they have in maintaining the value of that park property by even considering this mammoth structure that is viewable from the park. So the first question I would like asked and answered is why in the heck is this little drawing that shows what the impact on visuals will be from the park,why is it so misleading? I would like a visual that would clearly show the outline of the buildings, not just some parallel line to the surface, but an outline of the buildings. I would like to somehow, the document, to show visually what a 50 foot building looks like as opposed to a 30 foot building. Or to allow 30 foot and these guys are pitching 50 foot towers up there and I can not see how any of these proposed views indicate that mammoth structure that impacts Coulon Park. Now the City of Seattle seems to have been able in Seward Park to maintain some kind of balance, so when you enter Seward Park, either on foot, in car, or on bicycle or by boat, you have the feeling you're in some kind of rural area. What the City of Renton is doing to Coulon Park is turning it into one circus. We not only have the Marina Landing Apartments, but now we have this 50 story structure that's suppose to be peering down the bluff. Probably ought to have a gold eagle up at the top of that dome or something for the value of the buck. We ought to be trying to maintain the investment the City has made in Coulon Park. If they want to put something up there, then they ought to allow a playland and that kind of thing also. Also, this entire document, the pitch against residential is that if they put in residential, they're going to have 165 units or whatever it is, but they're such nice people that they're going to down scale and put this in and that's incorrect. City of Renton does not allow people to build on slopes more than 40 percent. If they built single-family residences on slopes less than 40 percent,they're going to get in about 80 or so units. So throughout this document, they keep claiming that they could, if they wanted to, put in 150 or so odd units or more, that's incorrect. Why does the City allow that kind of bunk to come through in a document like this? So I would like an answer to why has the City allowed them to use that kind of terminology in this document,when we know the City wouldn't allow it to build 84 or so units in that area. Also,why has the City allowed this document to go forward with no serious geological study of that area? I'd like that answered. Now another major issue is this entire situation with Resolution 2708, passed by the City Council. Our Council is also going to address that and leave a copy with you, but it was passed by the City Council in February, 1988, and in here it says that the City of Renton values the Kenneydale area and will do things in its power to maintain it as a single-family residential neighborhood. They also talk about Lake Washington Boulevard and they talk about Lake Washington Boulevard, in fact I'll read a little note here, "any changes to the development on Lake Washington Boulevard will have the intent of protecting the single-family neighborhood, but shall not encourage commuter traffic." And the reason why that's such a hot little topic is because we are already severely impacted by traffic and this project more severely impacts than it would if it was developed as a single-family area. And this document does not address Resolution 2708 one bit. In fact, they go so far as to say on page 322 that approval of the proposed rezone would not increase the probability of other rezones from the single-family R-1 zone designation to a multi-family zoning designation, and that is not true. We all are aware that zoning follows traffic and if traffic is allowed to continue to build on Lake Washington Boulevard,we're going to have one rezone after another. And they also say there are no other large vacant tracts of land found in.the vicinity. Now if the City of Renton has driven up Lake Washington Boulevard, they'll notice there's lots of available tracts of land along Lake Washington Boulevard and if one were to approve this kind of massive rezone, then they're setting precedence for future rezones on that boulevard. Now it says that no other apartment projects are currently planned for the nearby vicinity, etc. That's totally false. If you were to take a unit in the trailer park directly north of that which has already been rezoned for apartment complexes, you'll find in the bulletin board a warning that in one year you can get a notice you have to move out because they're going to develop apartments there. So we know the eventually disposition of that land. When they discuss Alternative 2 on page 335,they say somehow if one can figure out the map,this Alternative 2 would have a corresponding population increase of approximately of 171. That's a population increase of 171 over what? What it is currently? Because nobody lives there currently, so I presume that means 171 people will be living there if Alternative 2 is selected' so I'd like that clarified. And Alternative 3 - No action, on page 335,they say if they are allowed to develop as a single-family dwelling,they'd have 147 units. Its the figure I was looking for earlier, it should be 84 units based on current zoning. I'd like an answer to (1) why the City allows that to come through on a document like that and what is the correct answer. Now on page 337, it says that the existing street system consisting of Lake Washington Boulevard, Park Avenue North, Burnett Ave N, and N 30th street would provide adequate vehicle transportation capacity while some transit service is provided at the intersection of Lake Washington Boulevard and Park Ave N. While that's true, but these are residential streets. It's not like they're building another apartment complex in a highly urban area. This is an R-1, single-family residential area. There is concrete on the road, but is it appropriate in the case of Lake Washington Boulevard which has R-1 on both sides of the street and 30th which has R-1 on both sides of the street, to accept this kind of traffic from multi-family developments. It says here that the proposal includes the retention of approximately 83 percent of the site. Now, they go through here and they are allowed to use this as if they're saving a lot of property, the point is about 50 percent of the site is unbuildable and probably a lot more than that is economically unfeasible to build. MICHAEL HANNIS,ATTY HANNIS &OLSEN 3900 E VALLEY HWY,SUITE 203 RENTON,WA I represent the North Renton Kenneydale Defense Fund and appearing on their behalf tonight. At the outset, I have one very minor matter, but it's necessary raise to preserve the record, I represent people that are both here and not here tonight. You're required, I think, to give 15 days before you can hold this hearing, not earlier than 15 days. Today's the 14th day and I think you're allowed as I read WAC 197-11- 535, it said not earlier than 15 days and not later than 50. Fifteen is already pretty short and so that date may be significant,that one day loss,to some of the people who are not here and I didn't want to indicate by my presence that I'm waiving that on behalf of any of those people. The theme, in large part, of what I have to say is that the rezone is premature and as a result of that, it's not possible to evaluate the impacts of this particular project. The design for Lake Washington Boulevard and even expansion of Coulon Park,. the so called Master Plan for that entire area is still under work by the City of Renton. As I understand it, -The Bluffs/Public Comment-2- • • • there's consideration of a suburban recreational type of vehicle route down there, bike trails, hiking trails, walking trails, a trail system, all of those types of things, until that's final, until you know what the character of that area is going to be, it is not possible to determine how this project will impact. We can't determine how this project will impact the way it is at this time, an unknown. There's only one Lake Washington in Renton and there's only one Coulon Park and whatever is done on the master plan for that area should determine what is appropriate to that area,that should lead in the development and rezones should follow. Rezones and apartments shouldn't dictate what will ultimately happen to that feature of the City of Renton, to Coulon Park and to the Lake Washington Boulevard in that area. We feel, as Darryl indicated, that the alternatives discussed make the environmental impact statement a flawed document. The most logical alternative, obviously, is to develop it as is presently zoned,as R-1, residential development. It's difficult to understand a document that is suppose to represent the perspective of the City of Renton that leaves out a consideration of what Renton has already zoned that property as, and I believe that was reviewed as recently as December, 1988. The failure to consider development as single-family residential is just a flawed document. You can't evaluate the impacts of this if you're comparing it against high in the sky types of proposals that people normally demand these days, and that type of development, so we would strongly urge that this document go back to the drawing board to truly evaluate what single-family residential impacts on that area would be if it was developed consistent with this current zoning. For the record, as I read WAC 197-11-440, anytime that there's to be a rezone of property to a use that's not permitted by its comprehensive planning designation and some of this is single-family residential, some of it is greenbelt, so it will be used in this rezone for something that's not comprehensively planned for now. There's a requirement that the environmental impact statement consider the alternatives of the same type of development or that type of rezone on alternative sites and as I read the document, that has not been considered. We consider the alternatives that have been considered basically to be strong anti- alternatives, set up something that's totally unfeasible, show why its wrong and then you're left with the proposal alternative, and again, it's a flawed document not to consider the single-family current residential use, a realistic version of that. At page 3-33 and 34 of the document, it makes much of the Boeing and Pacific Car expansion as indeed, indicates that those are somewhat the driving force as the need for this type of project. It's to the extent the document depends upon those expansions as needing this type of development that again the plan needs to go back to the drawing board and determine now what the effect and what the need for that type of expansion and zoning will be now that Boeing's project has been cut back and delayed and as I understand it, the PACCAR project is gone completely, at least for the time being. That's obviously one of the underlying premises and its mentioned several times throughout the document that Boeing and PACCAR have'these big plans in the City. There's a discussion, some of it sketchy, about the need for affordable housing and there's always a philosophical discussion about what affordable housing is. Is it single-family residential, is it housing that people can buy or is it housing that people can rent? And I would submit what it really means is housing that people can ultimately buy. There has been no discussion in the document of the effect of taking this single-family residential inventory out of the inventory of that type of use and placing multi-family there and what's important about that is as we know,there's already a tremendous shortage of single-family residential,there's a tremendous demand for it and there's been no specific discussion here of the loss of that inventory to the City of Renton in this instance. Darryl mentioned a little the impact of Resolution 2708, this is an important document that is mentioned no where within the impact statement. Resolution 2708 followed litigation, its actually entered as a part of court order, its carefully negotiated to settle a lawsuit. The resolution was adopted after the comprehensive plan that is used throughout the impact statement as being the driving force for this rezone. The document itself, however, is inconsistent with the comprehensive plan in that it makes a policy statement of the City of Renton that,Kenneydale area will be preserved for single-family residential uses to maintain that character. A document that fails to even mention and consider the impact of this upon that strong policy statement of the City of Renton which was adopted again after the comprehensive plan is inadequate. The single-family alternative, to the extent it is discussed, is discussed rather selectively. Darryl mentioned that page 3-35 said that throughout the document, single-family residential is talked about as if there's no development there at all and that's the option given,that no action alternative. Yet at page 3-35, we're now told that the no action alternative really could result in 147 units. If you examine the code, that's an incorrect statement. That's a theoretical maximum on a flat piece of property and in no sense could this property be developed to no more than 80 to 90 units and still meet the codes of the City -The Bluffs/Public Comment-3- ,h of Renton. It's important because that theoretical maximum number is then used later on in the document and the most grievous example is at page 3-72, "When 147 single-family units is used as the basis for a conclusion, that those single-family residential units will generate more traffic than this project would." Well, that's comparing apples and oranges, you need to compare the traffic of about 80 units, the real alternative of single-family residential to the traffic that this project would do. It's again, difficult to understand that perspective taken because that's obviously a carefully made stretch in presenting the evidence. Height section, as Darryl talked about, is difficult. I couldn't figure out what he was talking about earlier when I talked to him and it turns out that my copy of the environmental impact statement I purchased, doesn't have any of Section 2 in it. Again though, height is going to be a prime consideration to all the people involved in this project, it is the most significant impact to Coulon Park and to the boulevard down there, yet if you try to understand how tall those buildings are going to be by reading the impact statement, it cannot be done. In one place, it even says that maybe this is just an error. In one place, it talks about four stories being constructed within 26 feet, that's just not physically possible. As I understand it,the beautiful drawing that leads each section throughout the impact statement to the right on the stand there,that's a four-story building and I think most of the buildings will actually be five-story,there will be another story on top of that and it talks about three,four, and five- story buildings being on top of a basement or garage and people really don't care what they sit on top of,they want to know how far it sticks out of the ground and you can't tell that from the impact document. Those things need to be clarified, Darryl already talked about the drawings that are little squared markings on one of the photographs. Because of the significance and unique character of Coulon Park as being probably the City's jewel, there needs to be some information and some drawings or some renderings perhaps that will allow people to truly evaluate what is going to be seen from Coulon Park and from the neighborhoods around there. The project is already somewhat usurped the character of Coulon Park for commercial benefit, attempting to look somewhat like Coulon Park, but we need to be able to tell how much like its going to look and how much impact something that sticks, as I figure it, 50-60 feet out of the ground up there,what type of impact that's going to have. The drawings that are presented do not allow that and again, that's one of the most significant impacts. We have one question that needs to be clarified. The property to the north is shown as a triangle-shape to the far north, there's nothing to indicate how that will be preserved, in perpetuity. It looks like a tempting piece to plow up at some point and develop separately. Perhaps under the PUD process, it would be limited to that, that we would want some consideration that that would never be developed as other than that. In conclusion, no environmental impact statement is capable of a fair evaluation of the impacts out here until we know what the City is going to do with the Coulon Park, with Lake Washington Boulevard, with bike trails, with so forth. In that sense, the rezone is premature and any attempt to try to evaluate impacts is bound to fail. I do have a copy of the stipulated settlement that contains the resolution I referenced. CINDY SMITH 1733 JONES AVE NE RENTON,WA 98056 The two people before me did a real good job of addressing a number of the issues that I was concerned about in the statement, so I will just touch on a couple that they did not. One of them is the study that was done on the ground water that exists there and they said they found only one slight seep near one of the places that they had dug. And then in another part, they talk about the plants that are currently growing there, one of which are a species of blackberries. I live about 200 yards from the proposed building site and know that blackberries don't grow unless they have a lot of water to grow on. I know that when 405, that's just below my house, has slides pretty regularly and that the State still has problems maintaining that bank along there and they often have to go in there and leave fill with rock. There other issue that I really • found appalling was the fact that the investigation done in October stated that the nest that they found was a hawk nest,which was true,and that it was,as far as they could tell, not in use. That nest.has been in use for over 15 years, it is currently in use,they are sitting on eggs right now, or they have hatched. I think you really need to take a look at that. And one of the other issues that I had was they mentioned on 320, 1 -The Bluffs/Public Comment-4- installation of a closed storm drainage system and a separator system for oil and water, but'there's no mention in there of if its going to be maintained and cleaned out and whose going to be responsible for that. You know you can put it in, but if you don't clean it out, it won't service. ANGELA INTAGLIORF 2100 LAKE WASHINGTON BLVD N, SP 32 RENTON,WA By the way, one minor correction on Darryl's testimony, the land the mobile home park is sitting on is rezoned for single-family (?, unclear on tape), not for apartments, that we know of. I want to make it a matter of public record that my husband and I are in the process of selling our home in Lake Terrace Park and plan to move to Pierce County. There are other factors involved in this (not understandable), but one of the biggest ones is that I do not chose to live down the street from this project. For those of us coming from California, who fought the good fight environmentally, as I said the first time around in my testimony last time, as far as I'm concerned,this project is an insult to those of us coming from California who fought to try and make that a better environment. And obviously, for those of you who have been down in California, have particularly seen the southern part of the state, you'll understand why we are so devastated by the potential for this kind of a development in an area that is as sensitive as this area is environmentally. Also, my British parents, who are now dead, would be very much insulted by the notion that this thing represents anything remotely resembling the Victorian style. They were born in England when Queen Victoria was on the throne and I believe I'm an expert when it comes to anything that is Victorian style. As far as I'm concerned, this resembles the kind of upscale, should I say, no insult to you, Darryl, or your age group, the yuppie kinds of developments that have become such a blight on our landscape here in King County in the last few years and that have been a blight for many years in California. And I am frankly ashamed at the City of Renton for even considering this kind of development and as Darryl has mentioned, if it were not for the underlying greed involved, there'd be less concern for that and more concern for the preservation of the environment in that area. As I said at the beginning, that drawing, that plan is very off scale, again, a problem I have with documents like this one, I have studied the summaries and they are a lot more understandable then the bureaucratic jargon that such documents. See these documents are designed for the bureaucrats, they're not designed for us peons. They're not designed for people like ourselves to understand. They're strictly designed to get at the center of what the developers and the bureaucrats want to essentially put over on the public and for those of us that have been politically involved for many years,we're quite aware of that. But I have studied the summaries and I'm concerned about the contradictions, even in the Valley News article. I want to hit home and some day I'm sure you won't mind my quoting the last paragraph of your letter, "that one time this piece of property was being considered for purchase by the City for addition to our parks department." I am saddened and disappointed that our City planners would rather make a profit than provide quality living environments for its citizens. They are starting this double path of development that will some day make our lake look like Kirkland's and might I say like, unfortunately, a lot of particularly southern California's lakes these days. So I'm disappointed in the City of Renton. My husband and I moved to Renton five years ago with high hopes that perhaps Renton was different. Perhaps Renton would not surrender to developments like the Lincoln Properties and as I said before, Lincoln Properties can cover up the obvious, but for those of us who loathes its history, it is a California-based outfit and Dick Starkey did not deny to us a few years back here that it was a California-based outfit and he told us then of the problems they were having with Lincoln Properties and I'm, unfortunately, very sorry that this pattern has continued. I feel a lot of compassion the owners of that property and with that if they are going to do anything with that property that they maintain their original single-family building character. I'm going to miss Renton and I have loved Coulon Park, this thing has nothing to do with the character of Coulon Park, but I'm going to miss Coulon Park. It is a very beautiful park and the park itself,the surrounding area, the greenbelt in that area is definitely a credit for Renton and if you look at the existing apartments next to us, the existing development next to us from Rainier Avenue from he other side of the boulevard. It stands out like a sore thumb. God only knows what this things going to look like from the other side of the lake and Seattle territory. All it's going to show us is its crass development, its crass greed. -The Bluffs/Public Comment-5- • DAVID SAGER 1025 N 28TH PL RENTON,WA 98056 I'm opposed to any zone change in the area. You have three alternatives here and they all resolve in a zone change. And I kind of liked your Alternative No. 3 - No action, but it's a falsehood in the number of dwellings you have recorded here. I go back to the 80 R-1 residential dwellings that can be built in the area. That is more of a truology. So, as far as this report is, that is a falsehood. I'm against all three of your alternatives because they require a zone change. I have no opposition to you developing the area in the R-1 zoning as is as of now today. Another falsehood is the cumulative impacts on pg. 3-33, no other apartment projects are apparently planned for the nearby vicinity and due to the established pattern of single-family and commercial uses as well as absence of other large parcels of vacant land available nearby for multiple-family development, it is unlikely that there will be any proposed in the foreseeable future, that is definitely a falsehood. And it was brought before the Council at your last meeting about a certain large area north of it that was brought up and proposed to you to be designated as a park area in the Kenneydale area and that borders 28th Place, south of it. RICH WAGNER 1321 S 7TH RENTON,WA I own a piece of property in the Kenneydale area. I have read the entire document, although I hope there's not a quiz because I'm sure some things eluded me. My heart goes out to the people who read and write these. I would like to agree with the comments that have been made, some particular comments. I think all the maps should show all of the Gene Coulon entrances. I found that to be a good reference point that was difficult to go out on the site and recreate. My copy did not have a contributors list, but I think I might have found that more interesting than Section 2, which I did have, I only just found out tonight that the proposal was Lincoln Properties and it always seems graceful to give credit to those that are paying the bill. Some general comments - I would like to see an alternative prepared showing R-1 so that we could get a better reference point. Very specifically, I have a number of comments I was reformatting in my presentation there as I sat, I had actually gone through the document and tabbed the pages I was going to comment on. I think the grading quantities, in my mind, were in question and obviously, when you don't have grading plans, it's very difficult, but what flagged it for me was that in the alternatives, the applicant could move into the northern sections of the site where there is a substantial amount of 25 to over 40 percent grade and still only end up with about 7000 yards. I'd also like to see the grubbing materials outlined in the grading section. It was unclear to me,and perhaps I'm showing my ignorance in the zoning, why Alternative 2 required rezone. It seems that if it went through the PUD process, it might not require the rezone. Generally, I felt that the alternatives were not very thought out,which might be acceptable if in fact, they're never pursued. But as I understand the SEPA law, that if an alternative is discussed in the document, and the SEPA document is finally published and there are no challenges, then that basically closes any opportunity to comment, including opportunity to comment on the alternatives, if perchance one of the alternatives were selected, which is certainly an option. So my comments, I think, will focus mostly on the alternatives tonight. On page 1-14,where they start talking about the alternatives, talks a lot about the level of service of the intersection studied. In the alternatives, it puzzled me that the north entry, which goes out to 24th, wasn't reviewed at all. So I spent a lot of time looking at the transportation study and why that wasn't included, sincerely eludes me. It would seem to me that, as an example on page 23 in • their report in the very end, a substantial portion of this development in the Alternatives 1 and 2 would • actually head north, when it's compared to the traffic flow that's expected on page 17, they're showing 24 percent of the traffic onto the exit,toward Bellevue, at 44th and another 10 percent at 30th. So 34 percent is heading north, and knowing as others have testified tonight, the amount of traffic that's already on Lake Washington Boulevard, it seems to me that a good portion of the traffic, if not the 34 percent, perhaps even more, would go north, through the north egress point into a residential area, drop onto 24th and onto Meadow and out to Park and onto the freeway at 30th. I was, candidly, quite shocked that exit was ignored -The Bluffs/Public Comment-6- • in all of the alternatives. If I come back to that point, it's because the document comes back to it a lot also. I felt that the discussion regarding the trails was a bit ludicrous, I know that the City Council has adopted the Master Trails Plan and even in that adoption, I realize that it was a very,very broad brush concept. One of the trails that's highlighted in there and is also highlighted in the staffs presentation to community groups on trails is the old railroad line up there. I think that to call the walkway, which as it turned out later on in the text was through most of the roadway system, and in fact in the alternates, I would assume all of the roadway system, it's inappropriate to call that a trail. Somehow, if this project were to proceed in some fashion,walking up that road, even if it might be marked public trail would always give me that feeling that I'm intruding on that neighborhood. I would also wonder if the trail should have a trail head. My big concern is if you do get the time, drive up to Meadow and onto 24th and you'll realize that right-of-way is barely improved sufficient to provide the services of the existing property owners. I took a good strong look at the graphic on 28 which is a rendering here and I had mixed emotions. As an architect, it made me kind of giggle a little bit, but as a citizen, it made me think it's a lot better than those boxes we keep seeing all over town. Now there may be mixed emotions on that because I agree it's not Victorian, it's perhaps psuedo-Victorian. I would be interested though, I know that in a rendering, if you want to make something look dramatic and great, you always choose the tallest building and this did a very successful job of that. I'd be interested to know that the smaller buildings would look like and that may be simply vignetting off one wing of this and saying, "Well, it will look about like that." But I think that a lot can happen with this site plan when you create that dram at your front door and not knowing what's really going to happen later on. On the no action alternatives on 214, talks about benefits and disadvantages and those that were most obvious to me were left off and that's certainly the visual impacts, the traffic impacts, the impacts on Gene Coulon. I think one could go on and on about the benefits of no action. Regarding the disadvantages of no action, although I agree that no other alternatives exist, such as was testified earlier, I really would challenge that large vacant parcels are not available in this area, certainly Pan Abode site, Port Quintal, the trailer park are clearly those that are already zoned. I'd like to take a moment at this point, too, to make sure that you recognize that I'm commenting on the efficiency of the document and not editorializing as to whether I support the proposal or not. I would agree, though, that Renton needs to figure out where it's going to put more multi-family or it needs to decide that it's not going to put any more in our town. It continually puzzles me how we continue to absorb more and more jobs and more and more multi-family and yet we don't seem to have a good vision of where that should happen. In the Land Use section on page 325 in the last paragraph, it refers to the northern portion of the site as approximately 1 percent, on the chart, it shows that it's 4 percent. I was intrigued by the discussion of planned unit developments in Chapter 3, candidly, I thought it was a pretty good discussion. There was some conclusions drawn at the end of page 3-30, Parking and Loading. The proposal entails a provision of one driveway on Lake Washington Boulevard, an alternative secondary access from above the site off NE 24th. I hope that's a misnomer or otherwise, all of my comments regarding the alternatives also apply to the proposed action, unless I misread how that fits in. But I was reading the document, there are no roads going to the north in the proposed action. There was one map that did show those road, though, and I think that should be clarified, maybe I hit it a little later. No, I don't find it now, it was the one that regarded utility services and it showed there was an easement for utility maintenance exiting out to 24th and I think if that is in fact there, it should be addressed clearly in the text, what it's purpose is, how it will be maintained, at what level and what access will be provided, or more importantly, what other accesses will be restricted. Throughout the document, it talks a lot about building on the 40 percent grade and yet clearly,when you look at the grade plan compared to Figure No. 9 which shows the grades,there are a lot of areas that are being built on that are over 40 percent. I think that there was one area on 3-32 that used the term "primarily limited areas outside the 40 percent", but the document should be real clear that the proposal does include areas over 40 percent. Now I get to my favorite part, the views. I try to construct these a lot myself in my business and with all due respect to the person or people who developed them,they aren't very difficult. I didn't try and reconstruct them on the site, I was just looking for relative proportions and I found some areas that puzzled me greatly. I'm on Figure 16. The proposed view, if I read it correctly, doesn't show Building A or perhaps it's Building C that's missing. It could be Building C in front of Building B, but then I would have the question of if you look in the lower views of Alternatives 1 and 2, and as I understand in those, those Buildings in 1 and 2 are two to four stories, the buildings in the proposed action are actually shown taller than in the alternatives. In some cases, it looked like even the tops of the buildings were maintained the -The Bluffs/Public Comment-7- same, but when you view the site plans, there're buildings located in the same place. So that kind of analysis brought in question to me the view analysis. Building D, which I think is pretty clearly outlined if you can reconstruct the station point, is a five story building, I think and it doesn't show nearly as high relative to the other buildings as it should and because I don't have the base maps, it's impossible to comment whether it's high enough relative to the trees. I would also note that the proposed views for Alternatives 1 and 2 are really just Alternative 1, I don't think that they were meant to represent 2 at all, or if they did, they need substantial work. An argument could be made on the view analysis and perhaps rightly, but I think it should be questioned, is that the reasons that the buildings don't show so tall, is that a lot of the vegetation before them would remain, but we go back to the site plan and see that the vegetation between some of the taller buildings is cleared for parking lots and then the steep slope is hit and also compare that to Figure 17 which is a cross section as well you realize that I don't think you can build five story units like that on these sites and not have a view impact. I think the argument collapses if it were to be made that it's because the trees are screening the front portion. On 3-57, it talks of the visual impacts to persons traveling on Lake Washington Boulevard, etc. shown on Figure 16, that's incorrect. Lake Washington Boulevard views would be substantially different than what shows on Figure 16. It also says in the second paragraph there, "Views of the site from 1-405 would be minimal." I drove by there twice today as I wasn't convinced of that and I think that statement should be reviewed. It seems to me there are two areas of depression so that the far northerly building and I think the far southerly building would be substantially viewed from 1-405. In Alternative 1, discussed on page 3-69, these are the alternatives now with exits out to 24th, it says, "There will be adequate site distance available for vehicles entering and exiting the site at all access points." This tells me that the author had forgotten that area up there on 24th. I guess what I'm getting at on the whole section of 24th is that intersection needs to be studied in detail and it should also be charted in Table 7. Something that's not addressed is pedestrian access along Lake Washington Boulevard around the site. My thoughts were, and I don't have an opinion on this, but I think it should be studied, what kinds of improvements should be made on Lake Washington Boulevard. The reason I have mixed emotions on it is, to go in there and widen it, add sidewalks and bike lanes and all those things, also means that there's a massive environmental, aesthetic, soils impact on the boulevard and I'm not so sure that is a benefit. It seems that if a project like this were to proceed, it might be real nice to drive along the base and not even realize that it's there. Oh, excuse me. The map that I was referring to was Figure 23, earlier with the water easements. It does show a water maintenance road and it shows a road going all the way out to 24th. That was never discussed in text, so candidly,this late in the document, it caught me by surprise. A bit of editorial comment, I found the discussion on water real interesting for a City that is so entrenched in the discussion right now of aquifers. This document would lead me to believe that the water comes out of a pipe. The final comments I have, I think maybe I've already made them regarding traffic on 24th, page 17, Figure 7, page 23, Figure 10. I think those would change substantially. The document does make the statement which was referenced earlier on page 25, 'The increases on average daily, average delay, would not be noticeable to motorists." Again, I'm not a transportation engineer, but I clearly think that would affect 24th if the alternatives were to be pursued. DARRYL INGELMUND (conclusion) I appreciate the extra time. Picking up on 3-41, where it indicates that the current apartment demand as discussed earlier is very strong with the vacancy in Renton apartment facilities of only 3.4 percent, gets back to that issue, the whole question of the need for affordable housing. The standard developers' statement that if we don't build apartments, then we severely impact the availability of affordable housing. To me, that brings up the whole issue of affordable housing be rentable or buyable and I would like included in here, a statistic that indicates what the vacancy rate is on owner/occupied units in Renton. Same page, Section 4 - Residential Goals, the City of Renton residential goal is to encourage suitable housing living environments. Neighborhood objective - a sound viable neighborhood should be created and or maintained and declining neighborhoods should be revitalized. I think what's fair to say is a large portion of lower Kenneydale needs revitalization. And it can be best revitalized by the kind of individual investment that you currently see going on there with new single-family housing tracts being built -The Bluffs/Public Comment-8- . .r,. =r revitalizing the current single-family neighborhoods. I don't think we could be discussing revitalizing those neighborhoods in lower Kenneydale and also building a monstrosity like this in the same breath, so I would like under Policies to reinvestigate whether constructing 165 quality multi-family units would revitalize these single-family residential areas of Kenneydale. On page 3-43, they talk about Lake Washington Boulevard as being a principal arterial, that is kind of peppered in here along with it being talked about as a second arterial, indeed, it is a secondary arterial. Still on traffic, Appendix E, page 12, the document talks about under Table 5, Planned Roadway and Intersection Improvement Projects for that general area and the first item is the section of Lake Washington Boulevard between North Park Drive and 1-405 and of course,that is a couple mile section of road between Park Drive and the 44th Street interchange. Project description - widen to three lanes, cost estimate -$5 billion beyond 1992. It was that kind of thinking that prompted the original lawsuit and Resolution 2708, by the City Council, clarified what was to happen to Lake Washington Boulevard. So Table 5 is incorrect and I would like to see Table 5 brought up to date in terms of what's planned for Lake Washington Boulevard and that happens to be termed "improvements." And this goes along earlier with what our Council has indicated that we feel it's impossible to be looking at a project of this scope when there is no plan for Lake Washington Boulevard. This is definitely premature and I would like to see a statement on the City of Renton's part as to why they feel it is okay to improve roadways on a piecemeal basis. Where did that policy come from and is that the official policy of the City of Renton so that the neighborhood never gets to find out what their neighborhood is eventually going to look like. And is that the official policy of the administration of the City of Renton? In the document,they talked about the northern section being left in it's natural state, greenbelt, I'm not sure of the exact term. My understanding is that unless it was indicated that would be left in that condition into perpetuity,that it is possible that later on - 5 years down the road, another developer could come in, apply for a short plat and develop that northern piece of property. I would like a statement in this document indicating if the developer means by not touching that property into perpetuity, it would be left in its natural state. • -The Bluffs/Public Comment-9- AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION 51067 '1 4 3 13 Kathleen Hoover ,being first duly sworn on oath states that he/she is the Chief Clerk of the VALLEY DAILY NEWS CITY OF RENTON • Kent Edition • Renton Edition • Auburn Edition PUBLIC HEARING Notice is given under the State Environ- mental Protection Act (SEPA) RCW Daily newspapers published six (6) times a week. That said newspapers 43.216.080, that the City of Renton has are legal newspapers and are now and have been for more than six issued a Draft Environmental Impact State- months prior to the date of publication referred to, printed and published ment(EIS) for the following project: Lincoln Property Company's in the English language continually as daily newspapers in Kent, King The Bluffs Apartment Complex County, Washington. The Valley Daily News has been approved as a legal ECF: SA: R-044-89 Copies of the Draft EIS are available for newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for purchase at the public information counter King County. (SEPA information center) third floor. Ren- ton Municipal Building, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, Washington, 98055. Read- The notice in the exact form attached, was published in the Kent Edition ing copies are available in the Renton , Renton Edition XX , Auburn Edition , (and not in Municipal Library at the above address. supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers Agencies, tribes, and members of the pub- lic are invited to a public hearing to corn- during the below stated period. The annexed notice a P n hi i N n 1 i P ment on the draft EIS,July 3, 1990,at 2:00 PM in the City Council Chambers at the (Notice of Public Hearing) R4238 above address. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSAL Applicant proposes to rezone the site was published on June 21 , 1990 from R-1 (low residential) to R-2 zone (low to medium density) residential designation, together with development of a planned unit development (PUD) for an apartment The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the complex with six apartment buildings con- sum of$ 43 . 23 taining a total of 165 dwelling units, a rec- reation center,and parking for 368 vehicles on the 24.5 acre site.The property is locat- ed between Lake Washington Boulevard Xatitheld North and 1-405, east of Gene Coulon Memorial Beach Park.The Marina Landing, an apartment complex, and a mobile home park are located adjacent to the site's northwestern boundary.A single family res- Subscribed and sworn before me this 26 t h day o f7 u n e 19 9 0 idential area is located adjacent to the site's northern boundary and to the south across North 14th. ALTERNATIVES DISCUSSED IN THE DEIS Alternative 1: Rezone to R-3/240 apartment units in 18 buildings; recreational ameni- ties, and parking for 517 vehicles. Alternative 2: Rezone to R-2/95 townhouse units in 25 buildings, recreational amenities ry Public for the State of Washington and parking for 227 vehicles. residing at Auburn, Alternative 3: No action. KingCounty, Washington Further information regarding this action ty, g is available in the Community Development VON#87 Revised 4/89 Department, Current Planning Division, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington, 235-2550. Published in the Valley Daily News June 21, 1990. R4238. Acct. #51067 0 City of Seattle King County Norman B.Rice,Mayor Tim Hill,Executive Seattle-King County Department of Public Health Bud Nicola,M.D.,M.H.S.A.,Director June 18 , 1990 PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF RENTON Mary Lynne Myer JUN 2 2 1990 Senior Environmental Planner Department of Community Development 200 Mill Ave. S. Renton, WA 98055 Dear Ms . Myer: We would like to take this opportunity to thank you ' for allowing us to review the Bluffs Apartment Complex Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) . At this time, we have no concerns regarding this proposed project, provided that the mitigation procedures outlined with respect to public health concerns, such as surface water and noise abatement, are followed to alleviate possible public health impacts involved in a project of this size and com- plexity. Again, thank you for allowing us the opportunity to comment on this proposed project. We look forward to working with you in the future. Should you have questions regarding this correspondence, please contact Gary Irvine or Tim Hardin at 296-4666 . Sincerely, Chuck Kleeberg, Director Environmental Health Services CK:GI :TH:baw cc: Gary Irvine, Supervisor Environmental Health Services Tim Hardin, Sr. Environmental Health Specialist Alder Square Environmental Health Services 1404 Central Ave.S.,Suite 101 Kent,Washington 98032 (206)296-4708 or 296-4666 F _ June 13 , 1990 Re ; Bluffs Apartment Mary Lynne Myer Senior Environmental Planner PLANNING DIVISION 200 Mill Avenue South CITY OF REPITON Renton , Washington 98055 JUN 1 3 1990 Dear Ms . Myer ; kEC E]V D I do not object to the development of the Bluffs Apartment Complex , as I feel people have a right to develop their land. I do have concerns about road access to the north by way of Meadow Avenue North and North 24th Street . North 24th is only a 30 foot road with one property owner having a hedge out in the street by about 8 feet , another with a rockery about 5 feet into the street , and a third with a concrete wall about 5 feet into the street . Ihave asked the City , on numerous occasions , to have these people move back to their property lines , without success. There was an ordinance passed in 1987 to take care- of this , but not used in this case . Why have the ordinance? There are two more very expensive homes being built at this time , with North 24th being their only access. I believw it is time the City do something about correcting this problem. As for Meadow Avenue North, I do not know how wide it is supposed to be , but it looks like the. same problem exists there also. Sincerely Helen Shook 1405 North 24th Renton , Washington 98056 t _ tiriT OF Q — �� DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY 4 SEATTLE DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS P.O. BOX C-3755 g15„l�-_ SEATTLE,WASHINGTON 98124-2255 ,r r o STATES OF P1fp REPLY TO ATTENTION OF JU•.`n,, 990 Planning Branch 12 ` PLANNING DIVISION Mary Lynne Myer CITY OF RENTON Senior Environmental Planner Department of Community Development JUN 1 3 1990 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 ``' EC IVED Dear Ms. Myer: We have reviewed the draft environmental impact statement (EIS) for The Bluffs with respect to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers' areas of special expertise and jurisdiction by law as designated by the President's Council on Environmental Quality on December 21, 1984. You are advised that a Department of the Army permit may be required under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act for placing fill into waters of the United States, including wetlands. Thank you for the opportunity to review this statement. Sincerely, Stephen G. Martin, Ph.D. Acting Chief, Environmental Resources Section Cyrus M. McNeely 3810 Park Ave N. Renton, WA 98056 PLANNING DIVISION Mary Lynne Myer June 11 , 1990 CITY OF RENTON Senior Environmental Planner JIM 3 1990 Department of Community Development 200 Mill Avenue South ., Renton, Washington 98055 G��� �9 Dear Ms . Myer; • I have reviewed the draft environmental impact statement (EIS) for "The Bluffs" and have a number of comments for the record. First, the EIS does a good job of describing the proposal and some reasonable alternatives and assessing some of the impacts. The developers' point of view is clearly displayed so that there can be little doubt as to what is intended. So the draft EIS has already served a very useful purpose. The state Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) seems to require more , however, and the paragraphs following will furnish some suggestions on how to improve the EIS so that it may be deemed 'adequate No Action Alternative. A very important beneficial effect of "no action would be to preserve choices for future generations, the consideration of which is the driving force for SEPA. The. final EIS should state this clearly. Affected Environment and Appendix B: Elements of the Environment. Many environmental conditions are not documented and analyzed on the basis of a_seemingly arbitrary determination in Appendix B that such is not warranted. Any generally knowledgeable environmental specialist could easily make a case that "air quality" , " Fish or wildlife" , "noise' and several other amenities are worthy of review and analysis. For instance, historic and cultural preservation" is dismissed as not applicable. In view of the facts that a railroad right of way traverses the site and the property is the location of the former Boulevard tavern, a more thorough investigation (at least consultation with the State Historic Preservation Office) seems to be needed. In general , the EIS should include a description of the scoping process and a more rigorous evaluation of elements of the environment. Wetlands. Page 3-21 generally describes existing vegetation on the site as "red alder cottonwood big leaf maple. . . . western red cedar. . . vine maple. . . . salmonberry. . . These are species that may indicate the presence of wetlands. An Army Corps of Engineers evaluation and permit may be required. Gene Coulon Park. The EIS rightly places a great deal of emphasis on the proposal 's impact on Gene Coulon Park. In particular, the visual effect is extremely important. The typical visitor to the park now probably experiences a sense of serenity and isolation borne of the fact that land to the east seems to be pristine woodland: This is a very valuable, but fragile asset that can potentially be destroyed by any visual evidence of development that !/ ' ^ '''', '. '' 4 removes the perception of isolation. In a very real sense, if one could see anything at all of the development from the park, one could see all of it. Thus , the EIS is clear. on this impact, but it is vague or misleading with respect to the impacts value. I strongly suggest this point be clarified in the final . Future development The EIS should indicate the extent to which development of any of the alternatives would preclude future choice of others fully or in part. That is, if the, preferred alternative is built, will all future additional development on the site then be banned? Would that be a condition of the rezone? Thanks for the opportunity to review this document I believe careful consideration of , and response to, my and others comments will greatly improve the EIS from one that perhaps gives too much weight to the developers point of view to a legitimate decision-making tool for the city of Renton. Sincerely, q W A w (79A i4')),pi L- • TT: as Versie Vaupel � �sP. 0. Box 755 June 11, 1990 Nnr Renton WA 98057 To: Environmental Review Committee Building and Zoning Department illO.LN3h��0 Jl�l� City of Renton NOISIAIQ 9NINfllb�d Re: Draft EIS for "The Bluffs" Speaking individually as a-citizen of Renton and as an officer of North Renton/Kennydale Neighborhood Defense Fund, I find several- concerns that should be more fully addressed in the Final EIS: 1. SCALE The scale seems to me outlandish in height as it relates to the hillside, to the surrounding community and especially to Coulon Park. The building heights are oversized and will dwarf Renton's favorite family park. Surely city officials will reconsider this point. 2. BUILDINGS Reiterating paragraph 1 above, I would also mention that the proposed zoning is stated on page 2-4 as "Residential under which medium-density, multi-family dwellings may be permitted. . .up to 25 units per acre." Has R-2 (what is or was low-density multi- family zoning) been changed to that great a density, or is this a misstateent? If it was changed, when did that happen? 3. PARKING The document states that parking will be 2.2 spaces per unit. • Isn't that too much of a requirement (if it is a requirement) in view of the fact that half of the units are proposed to be one bedroom? Reducing that requirement would allow less impervious covering of the doubtful nature of the soil. (Also, we should get away from encouraging so many parking spaces in all 6avelopments if we are ever to reduce traffic on our streets., 4. SITE LOCATION • If one would consider all pf the terrific advant;tges of this site, this site could have been THE premier development of Renton, but one :.ias to look at the developer's next door development (Marina Landing) to wonder how this •?roject will unfold. Unfortunately, officials' decisions some years back opened the door ::or projects like these that ad- versely impact Coulon Park, in particular, and the general neighborhood in general. 5. SOILS Soils analyses must be carefully looked at. Even the DEIS admits to possible land- slide hazards. In one part of the DEIS (page 3-4 mid-page) , it seems to infer that SCS is saying (which I doubt) that the soils "do not present an erosion or landslide hazard in portions of the site." What and where is the authvority to say this? Further, that statement should be verified by an independent, qualified geologist. Note that even that statement says that soils "do not present. . .hazard in portions" of the site ,(my„,_ emphasis) . How near are the bi.i.ldings to any such hazard? Also, Section 3 (when re- ferring to soils) does mention "silts," "clay," "till" and "glacial till." From a former project east of Renton Ejme years ago, our group hired a geologist who indicated that>.all of these terms could (not necessarily would) mean slide-prone areas•. Further . , as "to the clays mentiojed, could the clay be "blue clay," for which the northwest is _•. famous?. By the way, tla t winter we saw crews handlir;; some sliding soils below ,the pro- ,, posal 'on Lake.Washingto. oulevard. Could slides wit:..i silt and water end up in Coulon .Park and Lake Washington? A f 'tionally, the DEIS admits "The proposed development would`'. 4;i I Page 2 - "The Bluffs" - DEIS - June 11, 1990 change the character and quality of stormwater runoff" and "would contain higher con- centrations of pollutants and" be of "higher temperature." Again, I hope city staff., will worry about these changes and worry about the increased dangers of slides. I would add, too, that earthquake fault lines should be carefully looked for and care- fully studied. There is one such fault line known to me that appeared on aerial photos and is located probably not more than a mile away on a similar bluff near Maple Valley Highway and the golf course, ar.d we were told that this fault line meanders north and northwest. Even remote possib=_lities, if this is a remote possibility., should be con- sidered when dealing with lives and properties perched upon these bluffs. Referring back to the references of soil types in this letter, one reference I found regarding glacial tills cr tills is general; giM$nd concern expressed in this way: The authors say that denFe tills can be built on, in most instances, but did warn that clays running within ,a till could limit the strength and use of till and that looser tills, especially those with clays, require consolidation and treatment before use as foundations or fill material, if at all. 6. PUBLIC SERVICES I am reminded that Kennydale had a fire station before it was annexed to the city, but none now. With the developments going on in and around Kennydale, it would seem appropriate that the various developments fund a fire station nearby. Page 3-77 states that fire response time is expected to be from three to four minutes. That sounds good, but with more traffic generated by this and other develop- ments, response time from present facilities will decline in terms of minutes. 7. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC • Is there another access tci the east instead of further impacting Coulon Park and Lake Washington Boulevard?' I would ask that the administration re-read the transportation section on page 1-14. Also, on page 1-15, the mitigating measures are worthless to the public. Just who does pay for development and its impacts? The present, not future, residents, of couse! 8. SCHOOLS This is a difficult issue to address in an EIS because the school district and the city have differing boundaries and because the city has seldom if ever addressed the impacts on schools, even though the city's residents also pay for schools; the city, though, exerts no influence directly or seemingly indirectly on the school dis- trict. Nonetheless, the school board and school administrators seem to pay little attention to developments and their impacts. Obviously, the impacts are there, and the result of the cumulative impacts will eventually be alarming. But is anyone awake out there? Again, who really pays for development? . Could it be the present residents who have already built the schools and will pay again and again? • 9. GREENBELTS Those areas designated on the comprehensive plan.. and referred to in this DEIS ' . .R., ' j•'' (page 1-10 and throughout) as ireenbelts should be better protected. The DEIS states that certain areas will remain "undeveloped," and these greenbelts and so-called "un- developed" areas should be covered by restrictive covenants or other binding means to specifically remain so in perpetuity. We know that greenbelt designation by itself does not preclude development. In this case of a PUD, it is important to restrict any future development on the "undeveloped" and. "greenbelt" areas. . Page 3 - "The Bluffs" - DEIS - June 11, 1990 10. ALTERNATIVES Isn't it strange that development alternatives are nearly always, if not always,'. written so negatively that the is, in fact, no other alternative but the proposal? I realize the developers would .lot be interested in other alternatives, but there ARE other alternatives for this site. This site is so special and spectacular that there should be something grand and especially beautiful for it if it is to be developed. I have heard a few city officials proclaim that Renton has few upscale housing. Well, here's one opportunity to have a premier family residential environment. The proposal in this EIS doesn't meet that standard at all. Of course, the best alternative would be for the city/county/state to acquire the major portion of the site to preserve the natural areas to add to our park system. We have wonderful developed parks but are lacking natural areas for our expanding population. Once natural areas, with their native vegetation and animal species, are developed, they are lost forever to us and to succeeding generations. 11. CUMULATIVE IMPACTS Cumulative impacts are mentioned superficially in various sections, but those paragraphs do not adequate address cumulative impacts. For instance, such statements as "existing (whatever) is adequate to meet the demands of this project" demean this important subject. The writer'; of the DEIS, of course, are not futurists, prophets or soothsayers; yet it seems to me some statements and forecasts could be obtained from best sources and included about future expectations in various developments for our city and in that area, specifically. All developments should pay for cumulative impacts. Although it is true that one project may often not have severe impacts, the sum of all the impacts of all the various developments will ultimately be costly to the city and its residents in many.ways and catastrophic to our environment and way of life. So again, who pays and pays for development? Who REALLY pays? 12. GENERAL If developers and city officials could look at developments, even the "better" ones,with \a view of the present. residents, perhaps the impacts on us and the future residents would be adequately addressed. Perhaps that doesn't happen because the developers aren't one of us and most of the city staff likewise do not live in our midst and thus not suffer the full consequences oftheir actions and recommendations. Development per se doesn't have to be either ugly or destructive to the quality of life, does it? Versie Vaupel, individually Versie Vaupel, Treasurer P. 0. Box 755 NorLh Renton/Kennydale Neighborhood Renton WA 98057 Defense Fund z .,STA7 JOSEPH R. BLUM Director �t 1889 t'd STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF FISHERIES 115 General Administration Building • Olympia, Washington 98504 • (206) 753-6600 • (SCAN) 234-6600 June 8, 1990 PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF RENTON City of Renton JUN 1 1990 ATTENTION: Mary Lynne Myer Senior Environmental Planner RECEIVED Department of Community Development 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 SUBJECT: Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS ) - The Bluffs Apartment Complex (ECF;SA;R-044-89 ) - Unnamed Tributary to Lake Washington, King County, WRIA 08 .MISC Dear Ms . Myer : The Washington Department of Fisheries (WDF) has reviewed the above proposal and has the following comments . 1 . It was unclear as to why the Alternative 2 (rezone to R- 2/95-unit townhouse development) site plan necessitated encroachment into the northern section, an area left undeveloped in the preferred option. A site plan redesign would likely render this option as the least impacting environmentally. 2. What are the cumulative impacts on the drainage system when nearby developments, not just job demands, are also considered? 3 . Some additional recommendations (see attachment) to improve stormwater run-off water quantity and quality impacts are to: a . Use a release rate of fifty percent of the pre- developed two-year peak, b. Use -a two-celled wet pond for the detention facility, thus providing biofiltration benefits, c . Reduce the number of uncovered parking spaces, and/or utilize grasscrete in uncovered parking areas, d . Install at least 200 feet of biofiltration swale prior as part of the drainage system. 3 Mary Lynne Myer June 8, 1990 Page 2 Thank you for this opportunity to comment . If you have any questions regarding these comments please contact me at ( 206 ) 545-6582 . Sincerely, Gayle Kreitman Regional Habitat Manager Attachment ( 1 ) gk cc : WDF - Olympia Attachment 1 WATER QUANTITY Increased run-off from development should be retained and infiltrated to preserve base stream flows, and/or detained in a manner to preserve the stream channel 's dominant discharge . For Soil Conservation Service (SCS ) hydrologic soil groups Type A and B use of infiltration basins should be considered . Site investigation and design criteria are essential for successful performance of infiltration basins . Infiltration could significantly reduce the volume required for detention. For . detention basins, WDF recommends the following criteria for protecting physical habitat features in streams . Detention basin performance shall be such that discharge from the developed area meets the following criteria: 1 . Fifty percent of the pre-developed two-year peak release rate for the two-year developed design storm. Fifty percent of the two-year peak adjusts for the extended duration of release which occurs as a result of the increase in run-off volume from the developed state . 2 . The pre-developed 25-year peak release rate for the 25- year developed design storm. Pre- and post-development run-off rates should be determined by using a continuous simulation model such as the U. S . EPA HSPF computer program. If such a watershed model is not available, a rainfall event simulation model can be used . Run-off should be computed using a SCS-based hydrograph method, and the rainfall event should be a Type lA distribution with a 24-hour duration. For purposes of analysis the peak outflow from the detention basin should occur within 30 hours from the start of the design storm. For an appropriate level of protection from stream channel erosion detention basin outflow rate and the time for which it occurs must be analyzed . Since inflow and outflow are independent, storage routing is required to perform—this analysis . A level pool routing technique is acceptable . A suggested process is as follows 1) se'lect trial detention basin size, 2 ) determine stage-storage relationship, 3 ) select outlet structure type and size, 4 ) determine stage-discharge relationship, 5) route the developed inflow hydrograph through the detention basin and 6 ) find whether the outflow meets the established criteria . A variable two stage outlet structure will be required to meet this performance . 1. - . .. JI I , WATER QUALITY Pollutants in stormwater run-off should be treated using best management practices for the protection of freshwater and marine shore aquatic life. Treatment of stormwater run-off with a wet detention pond (Considerations for the Use of Wet Ponds for Water Quality Enhancement, Kulzer, 1989 ) and biofiltration channel (Biofiltration Systems for Storm Runoff Water Quality Control, Horner, 1988 ) will provide acceptable water quality control . Where possib•le, ' biofiltration channels of any length should be used for pre-treatment of stormwater run-off. To provide an acceptable hydraulic residence time for treatment, the two-year • 24-hour storm should be detained and released at 100 percent of the pre-existing peak . Use the methods in the. water quantity section for run-off calculation and detention basin sizing. Sedimentation and erosion control practices should be included into the design to prevent water quality features from becoming • contaminated. Also, regular maintenance is required to ensure :pollutant removal effectiveness . The following are acceptable design standards for wet ponds and biofiltration .channels . Wet Ponds -' A pool of water retained in a pond by placing the outlet above the pond bottom. 1 . Permanent pond surface area should equal 2 percent of the catchment area for residential, and 3 percent for commercial . 2 . Ponds shall have a minimum of two cells . Short-circuiting should be minimized by a pond length- to-width ratio greater than 3 :1, use of baffles, etc. 4 . The permanent water depth should be 2-3 feet . 5 . Permanent wet pond volume should not be part of the detention volume required. Biof.ilters - A filter strip or swale used to treat stormwater run-off by interaction with vegetation and soil surfaces . 1 . Avoid gravelly and course sandy soils in order to maximize water contact with vegetation and the soil surface . Sites with course soils are more appropriate for infiltration areas . 2 . Biofilters should be a minimum of 200 feet in length when outletting from the project development . 3 . The biofilter width should be designed based on a two- year 24—hour peak flow, and the following; a . Velocities should be less than 1. 5 fps . b. The flow depth should be less than 4 inches . c. Longitudinal slope should average 2 to 4 percent . For slopes greater than 4 percent rock or log Check dams should be installed every 50 feet. 4 . Side slopes should beano steeper than three horizontal :one vertical. tvir" s74 ( 1 t, 7 fi7/vi/3 b/ I IQJ 3 f.J/-��c A S 71 - Q -7 s o 77--A S' i //3/`01 s yI 7,eti. -74 3 f 7 7 3 w v 3 ��-revs 7r---74 v ,, 12(t1-/ 27 a J 1, _I 5-; Q..5 7< s, 0/7 -74 t A , — '7-13 11 -J I/ 4r3,7/v174 3g -�73//t7-..'' / 7?(3 37 484 t 14• r -r ` _71g 3 of -�'Q--�7C i l� , �z o?i 0_74 S^/'f#7 S 3--t 4. L'/ S-� -s, °'� ' f o fifes 3J 3 7713 //1-4 Oti 3�-r-t wi 2Zf p7-7 /0311 /7 Q .�� s T _J Q 3 3'01f-+ S V .sYrr�47,�74- Q / tip ? ../Azi 3 a ��377 a2 '/ / /-'JA ,fin vy /, -mac 27 c.• s S),! ' ', S/�1,J9 4so,64 ✓Q(�pj lJS' v7 tom/Lv✓o/// '2 /vr_.,4 / -0=4 -5J/74d<7a, zefo .7in!7 • .v3y e .7✓-A 5 :,/ , ‘774 ! 1,-1 7c 3 refs'! ,7/ y ✓ �s'��' tf ' i-,4 3-i o 2r 1 ¢S7 v kpf r ea,/n Q 5Y.,,e32 14a 1 61-/- J 7...t tom/ 3 � o4. W3 39 s/ - Q /374v3/3 s '7 01< il-D1f-74 CP/1133vyl s 1f4. a-7C 72-7, 74 f 7,-77.5"7-7 y X u� 5 1 f-I9 -,c-vy-A 5 31-f �I'2y_e 1,-74 012 2 n o r� h.� 377iirG' iv 4 Q- n/ p3-,4 1/3 74 V1f4 3/ c4 jd -'viv t a-,c 11374 r// Q-- /Fo f 3 q W t 4#-L 1/f �--r y %hs tF l/ y v u — M S wJThe /V47-LiX, - br- 111'10 /V-- ycu a`/ Gt it"arT.- p Q-A.t G0vj- f�', �DtiSe f us te n Cecil, 7A 1-lit 14 i h r`ci",1 P7 I t O � )44 Gr Ss 1 V �'ro s t o 4 6 /u s , n ofh ,/ls , 171 A dcs rts4/,- 1 vls i pt /d da R•t4, -£.' !2LLL yr /,dfS f T'- e2Z C<c — C I'd n - Gr / cl /f W4 v/s %E. di5 74-&r 6-/-O !, ( 'f-l2 o se. So ozyv 74- A e'deic Aa. 71- we a •--t- hia,e-i1.5 e-e-74 t�I£ h ��! �- � I - C GLI.L�-iG1S fft�' so Cs-, / y S i c i ( c YE S-�'�c� ,22o;.y.74 i`s "LbL h 6,-14s v- 4,0 o 4tc� h uev /tc $a V411 4,# y yc - 74 4 L../ 4 i� s a "a�Q/f h J rE LA-r ter Ca!mil5 C ! 71-12-1s -c It 'GLY 4S -Sec-ve_ f v£ Gt pa L f-Lca 7 v /1�^y a.s air/ 1,1s a det n b u-/ f`'Y �!_S 6 u.r' do tK :11--14 -y-its D_ . 1/ /AAy // o0ss)44_ 45frIJW � � eZ h F7(,Artf.e-, LAB( /moo hays , 4,s-4 .7/4ez v' /7 on' v i nLj 1,2 c y,- doe). - 74-0 pi-- 0 7LLc ,e,--- Pro s 71/tr.S' oil Vfi Ate e-t. ZCi, /v d WC s'isf ti i r p.c r '/iS vo cost io z-rs v Pkzos fs/Ec Ia!/y as -I-- 1 a I IA/i.// � fe#^va e.4 ti 74"4a ¢ . /ter-i. )1-0 LI-S tAr 4 ea‘ in' di' � I 4., ;,r u; / os - , 14r C ha , 04- " -h £ v t' v/ 5 k SL1 5/9� et i //-.S 14 a 74Gtr-/ /J a e'do- lr/ % /-4 OGt cc,/ /Deily �Ul '7�h 1 i o .v! Ft S• YLL hbus1fj &£taQ5- -t1. /y££,.s' fJf ? Ieu/ 1_ 4_C71 f"tta 71- «f f L!ha 1 yL G 7c` a r: ,-ia/ a a 1r£ dy //n j z q/ , y ' /4-4' c 4 t i- ' # hi , c ;4- 74- ��E i 1. c 'asf/ /cad ® i Z. 1.4/ si -4LI Ws- / Is f/'' 71'0 142 D./2' (-SW 2110 Lj D S Lc G h a- Gt G� l5 �GY G7i ve, et rat -4 LtS w a U a Ad0 si` /1 ✓e 1#-t r/ E v-tic S,L, l/ !/1 a y F s Own v- / v a 6 lt_ 5,4 c£ , i.r h a/9s - yv u �.r // /fa € - '1-c 4ln 74--14e. Gt.s is . a p s,r3,5- J ea / DC� - hfL 1-41 `iS Y&ii /£ �- arit kit o Gt f tic Si' e!S's o elf W-49 tz s- do44€ - . .) o- 241 yr- lIycs lot pig£ h1' pu71-- C ® GLC£s '7'`-U /' -!G�f ye-la C D IG(f / 5 , p/Ea sE A 74-- /6t- a 7 !z E ,O5 — * oi a.s has 4f.r. >4-4 t C .sue car i'4 CA /; •- - 4 IA" 41'4 4/0 yea.. ' �C �f�'�- V-- •r..c7L %Ai£ a CA y `'tom£ ,-% ye, ca SO `' vi/o r ?`. / A e•E 4O 7L ,is y`fd--ri - f L i c D/ti AO,s-'/E,s Lt Ss 74 C LE- p7"J� l�,S s- ye?c-1 *Odi7t ,'-i i,- i' v rs/ ie.r /- h Aj4 I1 ) " -1 c ash; 16*op-) L1. /1Io 9 2- 1x • June 6, 1990 PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF RENTON Building & Zoning Department JUN - 6 1990 City of Renton 200 Mill South RECEIVED Renton, WA 98055 Attention: Donald K. Erickson AICP Zoning Administrator RE: The Bluffs Apartments Dear Mr. Erickson: Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the Bluffs Apartments, issued May 15, 1990. In addition to, and sometimes redundant to, my comments at the public hearing on May 29th, I would like to offer the following comments and requests for clarification. • First, I think another Alternative should be pursued; that being, development of the site in accordance with the current underlying zoning. Such an alternative would allow a more appropriate baseline as it would reflect the impacts of the adopted policies of the City. • Second, access to North 24th has been ignored. This access shows, in the Proposed Action, as a utility access road, and in Alternatives 1 and 2, as an entrance and exit point for the entire development. Surprisingly, this access point was ignored even in the transportation study. I would contend that this is a clear omission in the Draft EIS, that needs to be addressed. • Third, in order to give the reader better understanding of the site plans and locations of development, the existing entrances to Gene Coulon Beach Park should be shown on all maps. In addition to these three general comments, I would like to make the following specific observations and requests for clarification: • Page 1-2 Terms such as "extensive" and "only a small portion" constitute an editorial opinion inappropriate for an environment document. • Page 1-3 (Alternative 2) It is unclear why this Alternative requires a rezone. Although a PUD might still be appropriate, the unit count totaling 95, may be within the bounds of the underlying zoning including bonus densities when developed as a PUD. • City of Renton/D. K. Erickson June 4, 1990 Page Two • Page 1-3 & 1-4 Quantities of grubbed material should be identified if they are scheduled to be removed from the site, thus giving the reader a sense of the traffic impacts on this early phase of construction. If grub materials are to be disposed of on site, this should be noted. • Page 1-4 (Alternatives 1 & 2) By comparing Figure 6 and 7 to Figure 9, it is clear that a massive amount of grading is going to be necessary in the northern portions of the site where parking lots will be laid in on 25-40% slopes. How this can be done and generate only 7,000 cubic yards (8%) more grading than the proposed action, which leaves the entire northern portion of the site untouched is unclear. • Page 1-14 - Transportation (Alternatives 1 & 2 Although it might be appropriate to conclude that "level of service for the intersection studied would be the same as under the proposal." I cannot understand why N.E. 24th was not studied (see later comments regarding Transportation Report, page 5). • Page 1-17 - Parks I think it is inappropriate to refer to the "pedestrian trail" as an extensive recreational facility. As indicated later in the documents, this "trail" is, in fact, the roads through the development. Although these roads might technically be "available for public use," it is hardly appropriate to claim them as fulfilling the intent of the trail's master plan. Walking on a road through a multi-family development will make the hiker feel more like a trespasser. • Page 2-4 - Building Heights, Orientation, and Materials It is unclear if parking is under the three- and four-story buildings or just under the five-story building. Additionally, it is unclear as to which buildings are three-, four-, or five-stories. • Page 2-8 - Figure 5 This design concept appears to represent the five-story building. A ` vignette sketch of the three-story building would be very helpful. • Page 2-14-Benefits and Disadvantages (Under the no-action Alternative) - Should also include no change to the existing dramatic and densely vegetated back-drop to Gene Coulon Beach Park. City of Renton/D. K. Erickson June 4, 1990 Page Three Although I think it appropriate to note that the demand for multi-family dwelling units is high. It is inaccurate to claim that "no other large vacant parcels are "available" unless you wish to discuss at length the definition of "available." When considering land undeveloped and/or zoned, the properties at Port Quendall, Panabode and the Trailer Park, should be considered available. • Page 3-28 Some reference should be made as to the maximum allowable unit count under the existing R-1 zone. • Page 3-30 - Parking & Loading It is noted that "the proposal entails a provision of one driveway... off N.E. 24th street." If this is so, this driveway should be shown on all maps, discussed in all text, and reviewed in the transportation section and traffic studies. If not true, this reference should be deleted. • Page 3-30, 3-34, & 3-35 The text leads the reader to believe that the 40% slope in green- belt areas is not developed in any of the proposed actions. A simple comparison of Figures 3, 6 & 7 to Figure 9 shows this to be untrue. A statement should be included to clarify the discrepancy. • Page 3-33 (see previous comment regarding Available Land for Multi- Family Development). • Figure 16 - Existing and Proposed Views Recognizing that view studies are an art, at best, certain discrepancies appear in Figure 16 - View of the Proposed Action. Although not discussed in the text, Figure 17 clearly shows that the intent is to maximize the view potential of the site. Also, although impossible to find in the text, it would appear based on a comparison of the architectural concept and the parking access shown on the site plans, that Building A and D are five-stories. By reconstructing the station point from the views, it appears that Building A has been deleted. ' Based on the length of the vertical lines compared to the building heights of Marina Landing. None of the buildings (except G and F) are shown at their proper height. For a comparative example of this, please review the views of Alternatives 1 and 2, remembering that Alternative 1 is made up of four- story buildings only.Based on the steep slopes in the front of most of the buildings and the clearing for parking lots between buildings B and C, it would be inappropriate to argue that foreground trees will cover a substantial portion of the lower facades of the buildings as the sketch indicates. • City of Renton/D. K. Erickson June 4, 1990 Page Four Additionally, please note that the proposed view of Alternatives 1 and 2 really is only for Alternative 1. This is clear when Figure 6 and 7 are reviewed. Remember also, that building A of the Proposed Action and buildings A and B of Alternative 1 are generally in the same location and are only one-story different in height. • Page 3-56, Figure 17 This cross-section created a lot of conflicts in this reader's mind. The five-story building shown in the middle is noted as building B with parking under. This cannot be confirmed on Figure 3, Proposed Action Site Plan, which shows no auto access under the building, or Figure 5 which shows a five-story building in an L-configuration. • Page 3-57 It is inappropriate to say that Figure 16 shows "visual impacts to persons traveling on Lake Washington Boulevard." Although it is appropriate for Gene Coulon Beach Park. • Page 3-57 It is noted that "views of the site from I-405 would be minimal." Please drive 405 again. I think you will find, as is indicated by the topography in Figure 3, that building E and possibly B will be very visible from the freeway. • Page 3-68 - Transportation This entire section should be reviewed in light of access to North 24th. In particular, it should be noted on Tables 3, 4, 5 and 6, that North 24th is now uncontrolled and that no improvements are planned. • Page 3-69 - Alternative 1 Please drive again on North 24th Street before restating that "there would be adequate site distance available for vehicles entering and existing the site at all access points." • Page 3-71, Page 3-78 - Parks & Recreation - See notes above regarding Trails. • Page 3-81 - Mitigating Measures Although not discussed in the DEIS, sidewalks along Lake Washington Boulevard should be reviewed. If such improvements might be required by the Public Works Division, their impacts, both visual and functional, should be reviewed in this DEIS. City of Renton/D. K. Erickson June 4, 1990 Page Five • Page 3-83 - Figure 23 Figure 23 shows a "water main maintenance road" which is not discussed in any of the text. If this road is to occur, some discussion should be included regarding its level of improvement, access, and control points. • Appendices - Traffic Impact Analysis for the Bluffs (Prepared by the Transpo, Inc.) Page 23, Figure 10 - Alternatives 1 & 2 This figure is inadequate because it does not recognize the existence of• egress to North 24th. Realizing the current and projected traffic flows (and delays) on Lake Washington Boulevard, I think it is very reasonable to conclude that most of the northbound traffic will not access 405 via Lake Washington Boulevard or Burnett Avenue. It will, in fact, wander through the development and exit into the existing northerly neighborhood and wander to I-405 via North 30th. Considering that, as shown in Figure 7, 34% of the proposed traffic is northbound, 500 cars might head'through the northerly residential neighborhood. More to the point, 250 cars, or half of the northbound traffic, probably would go through this neighborhood. Thus, the closing statement on page 25, "the increases and average delay would not be noticeable to motorists," needs to be reviewed. Thank you again for this opportunity to comment. I look forward to your response and will read with interest the Final Environmental Impact Statement. Sin ely, chard L. agne , AIA cc: Colin Quinn, Lincoln Properties RLW:amp ' rnETRo Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle Exchange Building • 821 Second Ave. • Seattle,WA 98104-1598 June 5, 1990 PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF RENTON JUN - 7 1990 Environmental Review Committee RECEVED c/o Don Erickson, Chief, Current Planning Division 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 Draft Environmental Impact Statement File Name: The Bluffs Apartments Dear Environmental Review Committee: Metro staff has reviewed this proposal and anticipates no significant impacts to Metro's wastewater facilities. However, we have the following comments regarding water quality and public transportation services. Water Quality . Metro staff reviewed the above-referenced proposal and anticipates no significant degradation of surface water quality provided that all proposed mitigation measures for erosion and stormwater control, whethe?_ temporary or permanent, are implemented in a timely manner. There should be close supervision of the implementation and maintenance of temporary erosion control measures to ensure their effectiveness and appropriateness to the site. Improper implementation and lack of maintenance are perhaps the most frequent causes of the failure of temporary erosion control measures. The construction of permanent drainage facilities - particularly water quality detention ponds and biofiltration swales - should be similarly-supervised at an early stage for concurrence with design criteria, as these seem particularly prone to errors in installation. Public Transportation Services Metro staff recommends this project be ,rrequired to have a Transportation Management Plan (TMP) that includes the following actions. r ` - Provide a free one-month bus pass' to tenants at the time of each new tenant occupancy. The passes should be for peak hour, two zones - max'_mum requirement: two per unit. 14161b, Environmental Review Committee June 5, 1990 Page Two - Appoint a Transportation Coordinator to promote and coordinate the use of public transportation and high occupancy vehicles. - Conduct transportation surveys/monitoring. Provide secure bicycle parking. In addition, we note that this site is not served by public transit. Metro currently has no plans to extend bus service on Lake Washington Blvd. Finally, lack of sidewalks and curbs along Lake Washington Blvd. will discourage residents from walking to Park Avenue North where existing transit service operates. For assistance in developing and writing the transportation management plan, contact Carol Thompson, Metro Market Development, at 684-1610. Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment. Sincerely, Gregory M. Bush, Manager Environmental Compliance Division GMB:lag5276 cc: Larry Adeyemi Several vendors sato fireworks stands are streets southeast also found a package of I'iz-inch the United Nations in New York. "Gorbachev has his ed by the tribe, which hires security offi- firecrackers;an M-80 firecracker and some small critics from both the left and the right, and possibly it o check operations, including inspecting rockets,all federally approsed devices which can is better to have the election of a critic from the left." . landise being iffered for sale, be legally purchased on Indian reservations in ' After the vote result was announced in the Grand dors on federal reservation may sell a wide Auburn and elsewhere around the state, but Kremlin Palace, Yeltsin strode to the podium to warm y of fireworks which are Iegal under federal which are illegal under Auburn's fireworks ordi- applause and pledged to "spare nothing — health or ,ut illegal under more restrictive state and See FIREWORKS,page A4`- time — to get out of-this-'crisis and-lead Russia to better times.' \ ' .1,' I fir c. h I, An,. ,,, t� y, • } Kennydale and North Renton resi g ents' . .... .... . va:,,,... AS.4,i,..'„,%Ae .-,;::'- 2got,Vei i;',N4i'7171.41.7-"Viiii 'y shred planned Coulon bluff apartments proposed project. open space, and consultants esti- �i474 3 B_ yTINAHILDING The Bluffs A arfinents ro ect mate'that the 300 tenants of the u ; � e � x � .`,' «vim P jl a ' ;�z . .,. . Staff Reporter � �� proposed`by' Bellevue's Lincoln apartments would generate about `!`� " mow, x 1 Residents of the Kennydale and Property"Co., calls for the devel- 1,000 more cars on Lake Washing- 1 a; ,, , ffi � North Renton area expressed con- opment of an 165-unit apartment . ton Boulevard. ''' s„ - cerns about the effects of the pro- complex on 25 acres on the bluff At Tuesday's hearing, Darrell ' ,, - _: a. posed Bluffs apartments at a public above the park. The apartments Igelmund, president of the North ""`', i- hearing in Renton Tuesday night. ''would be clustered in six buildings, Renton-Kennydale Defense Fund, �� r � �;� ' About 20 people attended the each between three and five stories said the project would be one of a . S. :l ..- hearing'at Renton City Hall, six Of tall. The project also would include number proposed for the area that 4*`= � " 'whom spoke to express concerns a pool,`recreational facilities and will ``severely impact" the resi- � 4 ,q - ,.; -with the•proposal's effect both'on 'underground parking for 368 cars' dential Kennydale and North Ren . P -m-poi .. . �, cs--r 's. � �� � � �� „���- the character of the North Renton on the site. ton neighborhoods and Coulon Staff photo by MARCUSR.DONNER •and Kennydale neighborhoods and Approximately 17 percent of the Park. . �d for bluffs overlooking Coulon Beach on Gene,Coulon Memorial Beach site would be 'developed, leaving In particular, the effects on the , Park, which'is located close to the the remaining area as greenbelt and See BLUFFS,page A4 )Ks key . art of deal for new Sonics arena ‘.:'IL"ammr. 44"'""i'''' '''-'4--- -- I • deciding how serious;the city's change in park- ing garage commitment is for Sonics negotia tors. the Seattle'SuperSon- Rice spokesman'.Mark Murray said that �Y Early morning rain turning to ity Tuesdayafter the "what the council has really done is to give us a :" scattered showers with partial oved an amended pro lot of flexibility,'.-' in resolving the'parking • .;,t `" , diking today, with highs in the , g y n area. issue. =�� "° -, '•a lower6os.Detail , page C3. aft e team's own- Negotiators for Rice and Ackerley will meet le..,..:., '' Contents nou1�C'ed that he had soon to work on the,amended proposal. ,Once the city reduce seating they have an agreement it will go back to the ,fit ,•,- • Ann Landers...,... ..-C3 where the Sonics cur- city council for another vote. ,,, .', R'`"' r. ' �� Ft I"t4Sa2 package. ; The breakthrough;.on the Coliseum.came a �; x ;moved, the council after a weekend discussion between Rice and, Classified Ads °°" `"C4 C8 i would result in con- Ackerley. Ackerle` said it was the will of the ' EditoCom rials A6 Y , .' Editorials .... AS r arena on land south people,.the will of the council,and"now his ever, the size of the own will that the decision about Coliseum seat a' Northwest A7 car parking garage at ing be made-in the larger context of plans to .. ' Obituaries.. .. .... ......::....... ::A5 s problem to be rene- redevelop the Seattle Center. The'council'will:_ Recreation... ..., . .... C4 Mayor Norm Rice. consider:those plans next month -'- Sports... . B l=R Whitsitt said he "will Ackerley had argued:that the Coliseum's AP Laserphoto . Stocks..:, C3 Valley Living....... .. .. ..... . ... .D1 it and study it"before ' See SONICS,page A4 Barry Ackerley, left, and Mayor Norm Rice 1 : e»er-,�:=;Y,'ear of $102,759 to $116,250, 15-year-old kid should be able to but the devices become PAO', including' money from rent on land. buy something like that." the most restrictive in the state — each year seize thousands of dol- • ono- 'His assets include land valued at Auburn Police Chief Jake Evans will be confiscated and those who lars worth of fireworks purchased de charged inside Aubur ,rted $760,000 to $1.5 million, but that said officers are enforcing the purchased the devices will be cited. at stands on the Muckleshoot Res- are is offset by a minimum of city's "no tolerance" policy "We've been trying to discour- ervation. It has become an annual Auburn police and fil cling $500,000 in farm loans from the toward fireworks again this year. age people from buying this stuff ritual exacerbated by conflicting annually advise anyone e so Federal Land :Bank and "Seattle ``Anyfireworks which dont comply for years," Evans said. federal, state and local laws. ing fireworks within the c lari- First National Bank. • with Auburn's ordinance— one of Auburn police and firefighters Federal law permits vendors on them at a stand licensed b • Foley's income totaled$168,506 • way to •$173,205. He''had unearned • B US the income ranging between $29,472 ring 'and$34,171, including$26,462 on num the sale of various stocks managed Continued from page Al ate by.a blind trust. His assets Include park would include- "Imammoth ,`statement for the project >had. "This is not a city document living close to the site, :h t�property indowntown Washington structures viewable from the `neglected to consider its effects on (referring to the draft Environmen- doubted the thoroughnes Jnit- D.C. worth$100,001 to$250,000. park," he said. -the neighborhoods and, in particu- tal Impact Statement for the pro- ies that had been done on the McDermott, "a physician . and `When you enter Seward Park 'lar,a resolution passed by the Ren- ject). This is nothing but a sales ground water. Although psychiatrist, reports assets of (in Seattle), you have the feeling it ; ton City Council in February, pitch for developers to make a lot said that only one she ire( ?71,020 to $775,000, including is a rural area,"he said, "but Ren- 1988.In the resolution,the city had of money." water seep had been fc ,50( is Seattle-home and his.40-acre ton is turning'Coulon Park into a said it would work to maintain the Hanis also felt that looking at the there were minimal conce rest- farm.:on Lopez Island..His$20,000 circus. They ought to be trying to': Kennydale and North Renton areas effect of the project was premature slides in.the area, Smith divi- gift. cameo from author Robert maintain theinvestmentthey made, as single-family neighborhoods; he because the city is currently evalu- the area around I-405 >rds- Fulghum and wife Lynn Edwards. in Coulon Park." . said. ating Lake Washington Boulevard property slides often. . Michael Hanis, an attorney rep- The project would set a prece- and Coulon Park in a plan of city said, blackberry bushes - resenting the`neighborhood group, dent for future rezonings to allow trails. - on the site are evidence agreed. , - for apartment development along The alternatives to the develop- erable water there. ' "Because of the significant; Lake Washington Boulevard, he er's proposal presented in the envi- "Blackberries don't gr, the city to'return to Ackerley up to unique character of.Coulon Park as .said.: ronmental impact statement were there is a lot of water to g ilt to $1 million a year of admissions tax- a city=jewel," he said, ,``(the city) "We think this is a totally,inap "straw man alternatives," he said; she said. •ena, ,es'collected at the arena._It also needs to evaluate.what is' bin to propriate use for the site,and you to make'the development proposal : Written comments on n for requires the city to lease the park- be seen from the park." 1- are going to get significant resin-. look like the only feasible alterna- ronmental impact stateme ing;,garage during:weekdays,' to Igelmund also"expressed concern tance from the neighbors," he tive. project will be;accepted 1 ener make $2."1 million. in' 'street that the environmental: impact said. Cindy Smith, another resident 15. • • 1 and .'improvements around:the`arena; - issue and to pay for the cost of directing vern ,traffic up to$150 000 per year. Cicadas ■ ■ ■ )olor=� Oiily fi",e ofklihe 14 amendments Were att e,.. ;, In O��. a scheduled for avote were �� l • ' Continued from page Al • ���4 �A; r ,, VVV r� ��° VVV T,• ;l't •s .e ed�-,y e�day ?:*::-.1.,... tic `, , - f r y �t .,1; terms of the sound that they received at least 60 calls a L.l:. t, . tip i a•'•16 �t n `' Ain ;:-, r•7r es , ■ '�`'•- .; ( 3 'l make," he said Tuesday.,And they curious or horrified hor ' '' '' { ' ' +� • �` f Q .. , A © t `pc can damage young trees where they with questions about the 1 • - a-, V.V-F� •, ;lay.;their eggs. Jim Martinez, metropolis w T _ 7 -` Others that, they're really .The newspaper even pri> 1 t• a^,;not go, g o'icause a problem," he , pes for readers brave enot ; �> s I s � i � i� �> ;said, t 'r ,t -.. z� • . the creatures. �.;j. • !I., 1,i --riit-• i ,i { , ,i r`.4 ' C ae enda11 ,Ni ;t lit, 1 Pries o•' 1 • I g thy; a o?�>,eY tested one,of,tth , . . . .� ..ln i ,i; -it ,- e A"- 3,c e the-- ��ewpaper,�orr watching .news: ,;some.cicadas;he+for . • • _ ,. ..1.,t i;Mi�t;i �_.�i1, ... '' � e 7.:is .men.Y moves • •acces to"�• -a S ro " i,Flately ;` t day night in is brother's • ; ••• , , 1,• .t tAtp�.''..i ge ➢• '—yes`< sn u• '" portant ''T • ._ :. , .� ,)�-; lac• forage is�an un .part he cicadas have reached'Elm- backyard. tv, ,I, :• ';aA• , ,k �, %�..).Prf V.:Ali p ;0 •ou• _.. " thize the•hills , of, the<,.multiple usemanagement;•i��.; {i r }at _, ., r , .,_ ., hurst," abroadcasterannouncedin. `;We,parboiled them <. i. i • t1 x ''' S 1• .fy 1 ortheas e W S iingtOn. f C l' 44'Vet O ' -'' nat. 1 fOr �. rs . .. , _ „1z. P x. ,g a teaser fora recent television sauteed them in.butter a c , .1 e irk fon lemen S are i T•• 'sRviro ias e,;especially est land.._, ` newscast. and ate them sort of like tte th-i•;K.e ! b*.ke ,the others�arenno •of worriedtabout'th'e impact of live- But Pete Wyman a Spokane WLS-TV news has run five or Kendall said. "They tke a Ci_ th"e�same°imporiance...: I . 1 '1 stock grazing oh public:lands and environmentalist,•says the cows •six reports "saying that they're on of a starchy potato. They �y 'e' o vwith ytlie unendinenf"for along"streams,'said Wayne Madson 'should be kept off,public forest their way,and also a story on what of scalloplike •consistency ' orally dropping",theColiseum°from':of Washington StateUniversity s streamsides:' people can do to protect their Perrino says this batch ed ao ,tli'e3Ackerley agreement'and the extension office here•. "Tie •riparian zones are too young trees,".said Jim Lichten- —Brood 13 —lives in tho veral •parking garage' amendment; two "More peoples'are calling to valuable," Wyman said. "That's Stein. •assignment Mitnr of Minnie .,a,*o ,.f THE BLUFFS APARTMENT COMPLEX Draft Environmental Impact Statement PUBLIC HEARING TUESDAY, MAY 29, 1990 7:30 P.M. CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS RENTON CITY HALL agenda I. Welcome and introductions II. Purpose of the hearing III. Project Description IV. Overview of Environmental Impact Statement V. Public Comment VI Close If you have questions on the Draft Environmental Impact Statement, please call Mary Lynne Myer, project manager, 235-2550. A QUICK LOOK AT THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT PROCESS SEPA ) DEIS _ ) FEIS > PROJECT DECISION t DECISION I \ more research public comment yes -- no is needed on conditions the project (Rezone and its impacts. hearing) Can the impacts be lessened to acceptable levels? Donald Erickson AICP L s onsng Hdmanas ra or Building and Zoning Department City of Renton PLANNING DIVISION 200 Mill Avenue South CITY OF RENTON Renton, Washington 98055 MAY 2 5 1990 • FIE° >EIVED 1 Rey Draft EIS for The Bluffs Apartments Please note that I would like notification of anything about this change of zoning. Joan M. Jensen 2721 Meadow Ave N. Renton, Wash. 9805E Having read the Draft EIS for The Bluffs' have several questions. Page i "three alternatives" plus allo-Action are considered but the 135 du is left off. What happened to this one - it is mentioned in the appendix studies!? Page 1. 1 45% of total is greenbelt (45% of 24. 5 equals 11. 025) - approx. 13 acres therefore buildable- Why not 78 single faminy homes? Secondly, even if they don' t develop the north portion now - is there any stop to later development? Page 1. 3 Why a need for R-2 under alternative two (95) ? It seems they can be built under R-1. Why so much earth moved around (81, 000 cubic yards) 33% of site? page 1. 4 Why same grading for 240 and 95? Page 1. 3 Thinking of Victoria Park overdevelopment - could this happen here? Page 1. 9 33% of vegetation gone! ! ' ° Page 1. 1e small point -8. 2 acres or 34% developed (34% of 24. 5 is 8. 3) Page 1. 13 83% of 24. 5 is 20.. 3•35---"16'% of site, or 16. 3 acres" definitely has to be a misprint `: _ Page 1. 14 No study of the traffic on Meadow under alternate for 2! Are these just red herrings? Page 1. 16 Who said that Kennydale could take 27 more students easily? Page 1. 18 "Wastewater demand 34800 gallons per day based on 100 gallons per day per person" - expecting 346 people to live ° ' ' ' ? Page 2. 6 Buildings A, ; , D1, E are shown to be 39 high when 35 is all allowed - how come? Page 2. 9 No mention and why not of improvements to Meadow, 28th and 24th that would be required if road opened? • Figure 7 Why x, y, u, w, v? No studies of soils made or traffic studies in this area? Page 2. 14 Page 3. 4 "do not present erosion or landslide hazards" - Didn' t we just have a landslide that covered Lake Washington and caused a disruption of traffic! - This was after Marina Landing was built ! <C Appendix - no evidence-but was written before landslide) Page 3. 5 • What is Class II and Class III erosion hazard? Page 3. 11 Are mitigating measures really taking the hills down - digging out the dirt and filling valleys? Page 3. 22 "alteration of approx 33% of 24. 5 site. ""grading required. . . . little opportunity to retain existing trees" yet those treees are what screens from across, 405 and park below - Pre they going to replace those old trees of simular height? page 3. 30 PUD. to preserve and protect natural features - how can they use this to cut down and fill hills? Page 3. 32 If this is approved then can the next project be far behind. They are already using their proximity to Marina Landing as a reason to rezone? So saying if this is rezoned won' t change chances of others is balderdash. The trailer park is already zoned for large project ! Page 3, 33 There is a huge R-1 off Lake Washington Blvd --28th !! Both Boeing and Paccar scaled back - point moot ! Page 3. .33 Have no objections to R-1 zoning for commercial development on end ! ! ! ! Page 3. 36 Future apartments on northern portion with traffic down Meadow is not and adverse impact anticipated " " ' Page 3. 38 "Natural vegetation, ravines, slopes. . . . should be preserved" Is that what is being done here? Again they are using compatibility to Marina Landing and not developing northern portion to meet balanced development. They are not serious about 95 or 24 so why did they bring them up? Page 3. 39 "9. 5 acres cleared" - even with 60% planted again that' s a lot of clear cut ! Page 3. 41 "Sound viable neighborhoods" are they made up of rentals in such a quantity? .y"?' Again the use of multifamily next to say it is okay! When do you say no? Page 3. 44 Why isrOt the greenbelt designation enoght to prohibit these buildings? Why can they move the earth and say "look no slope"? Page 3. 45 Keep R-1 zone and no PUD 8. 575 Acres built on nothing over 35 and all vegetation retained - gives us 48+ houses. This sounds more compatible to Kennydale . Less traffic ! Is this what would happen with no rezone? Page 3. 46 Rain I read max height 35 -. how can they propose 39? Page 3. 52 Have any of the criteria for rezone been met? Does this. mean because apartments were let in on Lake Washington Blvd w►e will slowly have all of Kennudale apartments? Page 3. 72 Where did 147 single family dwellings come from? It seems to me 11 acres are greenbelt therefore 13. 5 acres equal 81 max dwelling units which wouldn/ t give anywhere near 1, 470. Why would 147 houses generate the same amount Of trips as 240 apartments ! ? Page 3. 84 What is this construction of emergency access road to the north? Appendix C • Uses 20. 9 acres -- why? No test pits on north - why? No mention of Jan slide - why? What is stabilized by regrading and flattening slope face? What happened to 135 du? Appendix E Flawed study as it never mentions 24th - Meadow - 28th impact-why? There may be more things that I missed but I took the EIS out of the library and only had it for a week! Really think this rezone should be refu'edl , 4o 0 CITY OF RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor Planning Division May 15,1990 TO: Recipients of the Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the Bluffs Apartment Complex ECF;SA;R-044-89 The accompanying Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) identifies the environmental consequences associated with the development of a 24.5 acre site. The applicant proposes to rezone the site from R-1 (low residential single family) to R-2 zone (low to medium density) residential designation, together with development of a planned unit development (PUD). The PUD would allow development of an apartment complex with six apartment buildings containing a total of 165 dwelling units, a recreation center, and parking for 368 vehicles on the site. R-1 zoning would allow up to 147 dwelling units on this site. IMPACTS The following impacts are addressed in the DEIS: earth, water, plants and animals, land use, aesthetics, transportation, public services, utilities. The DEIS identifies a variety of possible mitigation measures. ALTERNATIVES DISCUSSED IN THE DEIS Three alternatives are presented in the DEIS. Alternative 1 would rezone the property to R-3 (medium. density) and provide for 240 apartment units in 18 buildings; recreational amenities, and parking for 517 vehicles would also be provided. The second alternative would rezone the property to R-2 and provide 95 townhouse units in 25 buildings. Recreational amenities and parking for 227 vehicles would also be provided under this alternative. The third alternative is a"no action"alternative which is used as a base for comparative purposes. A final Environmental Impact Statement will be issued by the City in response to the comments we receive on the Draft E.I.S. This document will be used by the City of Renton to make informed decisions regarding this proposal consistent with the intent of the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA). Written public comment on the DEIS is encouraged and will be accepted for 30 days from this date. As noted above, following the 30 day review period, responses to comments will be prepared and incorporated in a Final Environmental Impact Statement(FEIS). Written comments on the DEIS will be accepted through June 13, 1990, 5:00 PM,and should be addressed to: w. Mary Lynne Myer Senior Environmental Planner Department of Community Development 200 Mill Avenue South Renton,WA 98055 A public hearing to accept written and oral comments on the DEIS will be held in the Renton City Council Chambers on Tuesday May 29, 1990 at 7:30 PM, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, Washington. Please call Mary Lynne Myer at 235-2 0 for ad•' '•nal information. A '---(7)/jj . 401" Donald K. Erickson,AICP Chief, Current,Planning 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2550 Facsimile (206) 235-2513 NOTICE OF AVAILABILITY Notice is given under State Environmental Protection Act (SEPA) , RCW 43.216.080, that the City of Renton has issued a Draft Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the following project: Lincoln Property Company's The Bluffs Apartment Complex ECF;SA;R-044-89 Copies of the Draft EIS are available for purchase for $8.00 per copy at the ' public information counter (SEPA information center) of the newly created Community Development Department on the third floor of the Renton Municipal Building located at 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, Washington 98055. Reading copies are available in the Renton Municipal Library at the above address. Agencies, tribes, and members of the public are invited to submit written comments on the DEIS from May 15, 1990 to June 15, 1990. A public hearing on the document will be held May 29, 1990, at 7:30 p.m. in the City Council Chambers at the above address. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSAL Applicant proposes to rezone the site from R-1 (low residential) to R-2 zone (low to medium density) residential designation, together with development of a planned unit development (PUD) for an apartment complex with six apartment buildings containing a total of 165 dwelling units, a recreation center, and parking for 368 vehicles on the 24.5 acre site. The property is located between Lake Washington Boulevard North and I-405, east of Gene Coulon Memorial Beach Park. The Marina Landing, an apartment complex, and a mobile home park are located adjacent to the site's northwestern boundary. A single family residential area is located adjacent to the site's northern boundary and to the south across North 14th. ALTERNATIVES DISCUSSED IN THE DEIS Alternative 1: Rezone to R-3/240 apartment units in 18 buildings; recreational amenities, and parking for 517 vehicles. Alternative 2: Rezone to R-2/95 townhouse units in 25 buildings, recreational amenities and parking for 227 vehicles. Alternative 3: No action. Further information regarding this action is available in the Community Development Department, Current Planning Division, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington, 235-2550. Published: May 14, 1990 I !,,i • AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION. .5 1067 .. Kathleen Hoover ,being first duly sworn on oath states that he/she is the Chief Clerk of the V NOTICE.OF°AVAILABILIo, Notice is given Linder State ltnyj©nmental ProVALLEY DAILY NEWS ttheon Act (SEPA), a 80t that the City of Renton has issued a Draft Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for • Kent Edition • Renton Edition • Auburn Edition the following project: ' Lincoln Property Company's The Bluffs Apartment Complex Daily newspapers published six (6) times a week. That said newspapers ECF;SA;R-044-89 . are legal newspapers and are now and have been for more than six Copies of the Draft EIS are available for months prior to the date of publication referred to, printed and published purchase of $8.00 per copy at the public • information counter(SEPA information cen- in the English language continually as daily newspapers in Kent, King ter)of the newly created Community Devel County, Washington. The Valley Daily News has been approved as a legal opment Department on the third floor of the Real 200 newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for Mill ton nuei lout Bu�ldin Renton located atgton King County. 98055. Reading copies are available in the Renton Municipal Library at the above address.Agencies,tribes,and members of The notice in the exact form attached, was published in the Kent Edition the public are invited to submit written , Renton Edition WY , Auburn Edition , (and not in comments on the DEIS from May 15, 1990 supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers to June 15, 1990. A public hearing on the duringthe below statedperiod. The annexed notice a P 77 h 1 i r. N n t i 'P document:30p.m in will be Cityh Councilld May 29 at 7:30 p.m. the Chambers at the above address. (Notice of Availabi,lty.) R4152 DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSAL Applicant proposes to rezone the site from R-1 (low residential) to R-2 zone (low to. was published on May 14 , 1990 . medium density). residential designation, together with development of a planned unit development (PUD) for an apartment ' complex with six apartment buildings con- The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the 'Mining a total of 165 dwelling units, a rec- sum of$ 46 , 55 reation center,and parking for 368 vehicles on the 24.5 acre site.The property is locat- ed between Lake Washington Boulevard 7(�� • and 1-c east of Gene Coulon Memorial Beach Park.The Marina Landing, an apartment complex,and a mobile home park are located adjacent to the site's northwestern boundary.A single family res- idential area is located adjacent to the Subscribed and sworn before me this .31 st day of Nay 19 9 0 site's northern boundary and'to the south across North 14th. ALTERNATIVES DISCUSSED IN 'THE. DEIS Alternative 1:Rezone to R-3/240 apartment units in 18 buildings; recreational ameni- ' 67 _.•ee 1: 7 ties, and parking for 517 vehicles. Alternative 2: Rezone to R-2/95 townhouse units in.25 buildings,recreational amenities to Public for the State of Washington • and parking for 227 vehicles. rY g Alternative 3: No action. residing at Auburn, Further information regarding this action is King County, Washington • available in the Community Development . Department, Current Planning Division, VDN#87 Revised 4/89 Municipal235-2550. :,.Building,_Renton Washiu,ngto , .-. ,. Published'in the,ValleyiDaily^News Ma_ PLANNING DIVISION Public Notae r" CITY OF RENTON 14, 1990. R4152. Acct. #51067 ttgVE ft - - - — - ti. " CITY OF RENTON PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT .. Earl Clymer, Mayor Lynn Guttmann, Director March 15, 1990 Colin Quinn Lincoln Property Company, N.C. Inc. 1745 114th Avenue S.E. Bellevue, WA 989004 SUBJECT: Variance from Driveway Slope Requirement, East of Lake Washington Blvd. (across from Gene Coulon Park), Lincoln Property: The Bluffs Dear Mr. Quinn: As you are aware the Board of Public Works reviewed the subject request and denied it because: a) the current alignment as submitted does not address secondary access; b) slope reduction for emergency access poses problems; and, c) there are major problems of access during inclement weather which have not been addressed. If you have further questions, do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, idc,A .zWil Dave Tibbot Customer Service Manager PMP cc: R.Nelson APPEAL PROCESS Pursuant to Title IV, Section 3011(B)1.(b) of the City's Code, the applicant or any aggrieved party may make a written appeal to the Hearing Examiner on the administratie decision of the Board of Public Works on or before March 28, 1990. The fee for such appeal is $75.00 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2569 Facsimile (206) 235-25.13 BOARD OF PUBLIC WORKS 8.45 a.m. Renton Municipal Building March 14, 1990 5th Floor Conference Room IN ATTENDANCE: Ken Nyberg, Acting Chairman Paul Lumbert, Acting Office Engineer Ron Nelson, Building Official Patricia Porter, Administrative Secretary Dave Tibbot, Customer Services Manager VISITORS: Colin Quinn, Lincoln Property Roy Lewis, Dodds Engineers (The Bluffs) Dave Rembert, Puget Power • Mary Lynne Myer, Planning Division MINUTES 1. CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order by Acting Chairman Nyberg at 8:55 a.m. 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Moved by NELSON, seconded by TIBBOT, to approve the meeting minutes dated February 28, 1990. MOTION CARRIED 3. CORRESPONDENCE: a. Letter dated 3/12/90 from City Attorney re Grady Way Associates regarding whether the City should pursue proceeding against Grady Way Assoc. Moved by NELSON, seconded by TIBBOT, to continue for one week MOTION CARRIED b. Letter dated 3/9/90 from Mr. & Mrs. W. Vaupel ref. Bryant Motors, ECF-127-89. Information only. 4. REFERRALS FROM CITY COUNCIL: 5. REQUESTED ACTION: VARIANCES Request: VARIANCE FROM DRIVEWAY SLOPE REQUIREMENT REQUEST, LINCOLN PROPERTY COMPANY, EAST OF LAKE WASHINGTON BLVD.. (ACROSS FROM GENE COULON PARK). Facts:. The only satisfactory access to the developable portion of this property requires road grades exceeding 8%. The proposed alignment was designed to minimize both site/vegetation disturbance and road grade. The ,,applicant, Colin Quinn, advised he had submitted the variance prematurely because he thought if a variance was obtainable, that fact could be mentioned in the EIS. If not, he would proceed with an alternative solution to the proposed alignment. BOARD OF PUBLIC WORKS March 14, 1990 Page 2 Discussion: Mr. Quinn explained that their proposed development of 160 low density, multi-family apartments is going through a PUD and rezone process. Access is the most difficult problem because of the bluffs in the area. They have designed a serpentine access with 15% minimum grade to minimize the disruption in vegetation and earth movement. Knowing the change in grade percentage would require a variance, they asked the Board to consider trade-offs in terms of minimizing the access problem. They felt that installation of a sophisticated sprinkling system would off-set the problem of emergency access to the site. He indicated they have talked with the Fire Department personnel in this regard. Dave Tibbot, Customer Service Manager, asked the engineer if this access would be impassable in ice or snow conditions. He said the entire area is a steep grade which would undoubtedly result in at least a two week closure in severe winter weather conditions and he asked what would happen to 160+ vehicles that had no access to the site. Mr. Quinn talked about possible changes to the road surface, i.e., grooved surfaces, traction, heating devices, etc. to address that question. Ron Nelson felt the request was premature and that the most significant fact was the health and safety of any tenants at this proposed development. Motion: Moved by NELSON, seconded by TIBBOT, to deny the variance request because: a) current alignment as submitted does not address secondary access; b) slope reduction for emergency access poses problems; and, c) there are major problems of access during inclement weather which have not been addressed. MOTION CARRIED (Ken Nyberg noted the although the Board could not comment on alternatives they would encourage the applicant to submit alternatives which are in conformance with City standards and policies.) . Request: VARIANCE FROM UNDERGROUNDING ORDINANCE, PUGET POWER, I-405 S- CURVEs, S. 3RD ST., BTN MAIN AND MILL AVE. S. Facts: The existing overhead lines (in back of the Recruiting Center) need to be temporarily moved for the construction of the Cedar River Pipe Line Utilidoor. (This is being installed by WSDOT for the straightening of the I-405 S-Curves.) The temporary time frame is 1 - 1 1/2 years. After construction (approximately spring of 1992), Puget will put the lines back in the original location; and, at that time, one other pole will have to be relocated because of the S. 4th St. overpass. A pole will be skipped at the northwest corner of Houser and Mill to reduce the number of wires crossing Houser. Discussion: Dave Rembert of Puget Power explained that when they relocate it will be with a slight modification/change. They propose to clean up the Houser and Mill Ave. S. intersection and to improve the aesthetics by not crossing Houser two times in less than 100 feet. The improvement would also release an easement for anchors on the BOARD OF PUBLIC WORKS March 14, 1990 Page 3 northwest corner of the Museum property. They will also need to install one anchor pole and one backgye with anchor in the City Hall parking lot planting area. Ken Nyberg questioned the two issues being handled under one application given the temporary time frame is one to two years away. Motion: Moved by TIBBOT, seconded by NELSON, that the Board accept the recommendation of staff and approve the temporary relocation request and subsequent replacement; the replacement deviation to be contingent upon the applicant's vacating the existing easement in the Museum area and requiring its replacement in the City Hall parking lot planting area. MOTION CARRIED 6. OLD BUSINESS: Ron Nelson expressed concern about the unresolved issue of occupancy that exists at the Victoria Hills, Benson Hwy. project. First Cities Development has not applied through the Board deferral process to date and improvements have not been installed. Ron suggested that the Board meet with the developer to forestall a potential problem. A meeting was set for Thursday, March 15th, at 3:00 p.m. between CDC and Public Works staff to discuss the matter. 7. COMMENTS AND ANNOUNCEMENTS: None 8. ADJOURNMENT: Meeting adjourned at 9:30 a.m. - CITY OF RENTON THE RENTON CITY COUNCIL Earl Clymer, Mayor January 31, 1990 Michael Blumen The Ferris Company Key Bank Building 10655 N.E. 4th Street Bellevue, Washington 98004 RE: The Bluffs, Lake Washington Boulevard (044-89) Dear Mr. Blumen: City staff have completed an initial review of the Preliminary DEIS for the above-referenced project. Comments from representatives of Long-Range Planning, Parks and Recreation, Fire Prevention, Police Department and the Public Works Department (Storm Water Engineering, Design Engineering, Utilities Engineering, Transportation Systems Engineering) . have been included for your information. Also provided are comments from Current Planning which Lenora Blauman and I have prepared. An overview of our major concerns is attached, with accompanying references (by page number) to the EIS document; requests for minor modifications to content and editorial comments (e.g. recommendations for style, language clarification) are written directly into the EIS document. When you have reviewed these materials, if you have questions or if you would like to meet with staff to discuss revision of the DEIS , please telephone me or Ms. Blauman at 235-2550. Thank you. S inc e , , r • Donald K. Erickson, AICP Chief, Current Planning 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2586 CITY OF RENTON r COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor Planning Division September 13 , 1989 Michael Blumen . The Ferris Company 10655 N.E. 4th Street #300 Bellevue, WA 98004 RE: The Bluffs Lake Washington Boulevard ECF 044-89 Dear Mr. Blumen: City staff, in consultation with Colin Quinn, have determined that the following alternatives should be reviewed in the Environmental Impact Statement for the above-referenced project. a) Preferred Project: Rezone from R-1 to R-3, and development with 165 multi-family units -- conceptual site plan to be provided. b) Alternative. #1: Rezone from R-1 to R-3, and development with 240 multi-family units -- conceptual site plan to be provided. c) Alternative #2: Rezone from R-1 to R-2, and development with 120 units in a Planned Unit Development -- conceptual site plan to be provided. d) Alternative #3 : Rezone from R-1 to R-2, and development with 95 townhouse units -- conceptual site plan to be provided. e) Alternative #4 - No action. • 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2550 Facsimile (206) 235-2513 'iicnael blumen September 13 , 1989 .Page 2 This information should be included in all contract documents and transmitted to our office for approval at your earliest convenience. If you have any questions, please contact Lenora Blauman, project manager, or me, at 235-2550. ely, Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator DKE/lb/mjp • .:....t#` 1 I.C.. . . > >s 7:00 PM (1) INTRODUCTION (Don Erickson) a) City Staff b) Lincoln Properties Company, N.C. c) The Ferris Company 7:10 PM (2) BACKGROUND (SEPA) a) Determination of Significance (ERC Decision) b) . Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS/FEIS) c) Scoping 7:20 PM (3) PROJECT DESCRIPTION a) Colin Quinn, Director, Land Use Planning Lincoln Properties Company, N.C. , Inc. b) Leslie Lloyd/Mike Blumen, The Ferris Company • .c) Lenora Blauman, Senior Planner (Permits) • d) Questions and Answers .About Project Description 7:40 PM (4) SCOPING ISSUES a) L. Blauman/D. Erickson • b) Public Input On Scoping Issues c) Summary 8:50 PM (5) ADJOURN • Project Description Rezoning of a 20.9 acre site from R-1 Residential to R-3 Residential. Approximately 9.5 acres of the property is to be developed area. The remaining 11.4 acres is proposed to remain undisturbed open space. A portion of the total site acreage will involve vacation of unbuilt public right-of-way. The proponet's preferred action consists of approximately 165 multi-family dwelling units contained in approximately eight buildings. The overall site density is 7.5 units/acres. Additionally, the proposal will include a recreational building and parking for an estimated 330 cars. The residential structures will be contained in four-story buildings with a maximum height of 45 feet above finished grade. Primary site access is proposed from Lake Washington Blvd. S.E. The preferred action will be reviewed through the site plan approval process by the City- to ensure compliance with the design standards of the City. Alternatives to the preferred action include a no building alternative, a low- density development of approximately 140 dwelling units, and a higher density development of approximately 276 dwelling units. •.• . .. . • • • . „ . • • ' . . . • • • • .- • • . . • . • . • . • . . . • • • , . .. . •• . . ..• . . . .. . .. . .. . . ._. . ._ ... .. . .t,. . 1 . . • P .. .. . • •• V . - . . . . . . . . . . . • , . v i I H.190/ a -1-----..-- 4- a '---- od..' A • i ... •••• • • • • , .41 — 11 A I ai—Di i I ; t A • V •4.AZI1 :1 t; N • in • Pi .1 A c2 0 . 0 01 N 1..... 14 N ra ri A 1 •• ea RI r'l 1 r2 Pli -74!•1*-- tn A ci 4,..q4 ttttt 5.4 I -0-1 at I OL" - t _____________ ___: -..i::,...._.11 -ii•••••: • . ..; a i 1 J ,..1A . .... .„,ya•-••405;c3......:-. c - ••••••-1 ;; •-•.”-----f ,...,,,..... ...„ a......... ; ,........._,—,--_____„....„, nv-, •,..cr ". • ;•••• ....-.... -. ....• • . .. ---•• •--1.-.•--,-----,-,------,_2.. .._________,,--_. . . • „.... . . f...%- • • • . X 0.,.......f.:,/,-..of lt•..ta... G taco limaLL rs..1“.../ • eel sici . . ''' •••3' 1 ,,, I r;'" - 7, :Pr'. :. 2' .PlileiWOff. . - ci A , : tillari • "•A 111%111 1 ' • . i. 1. ••. bal..-... 4g ii % A I VA& A‘ i„.,.•• . ibii0. • ...t.a ur 0,1-a- . I I .0. er , 4 f/4"..e.1.ittl.P17'...n2141 . ,, ./...$3 4:...,. .;\ . -to ,, . • sy zt-'* ° I LA • i y/10,100 • 2.I: • i - VT 0 4.1-z-. 7„ 1 • if • '. If . ‘cA\ i.t7c, Am. • . i 9.4 rf t„,.. p b. • ;-,c._ ; : k.. . ,t 4 0/11 I 01)i k---1'1.4.-1.3--1---°••1 41• - •_-=-•-•-•' .._,..,--___....----,.-----:-----• --.-- -".. ----4 g il' . `''' ii 11 • ' •fl..-.1•a .4 ' :it • it;liTTil•5 it olvfir. -.,----2.-- •''''''., : -21 '! 13: ;• •11 '''' • • a 'a ;Atif 0• N : ... •-•,';'. ..,,, • ,,. ,, • q a! i :I A.f..tl 41 A i . '. ' ,..!,!''' 0. . A-1(g 0004 e. t!' -_,-----(/ , / i....t/it//, . i 4 • ;Ik 1 I . ' X 4 1.1 .r1 • ,4 ‘,,,A , Lr . •------ „ /14k/ •11'**/ / //' 2 i p, 1 1 , ( . ' : : 1 oil % . co .0.2411'..‘ )....2.-7-,427/1 1; /./• 7)-/ i / / /.. . ) L•13.1v11 •ii p : t 0 I. V' • . • ..,..A. :„,•--.:.:,-,..„......:ii..,..,,..-7/..;./4.,,,,pd.,..iy ,, /// .•(///, i/v/. ic,9_,///. : ;......;• ' 0 ,..-,•T.;- $.-..::: .4..., . ...,—.•:•••-•...,:•••• ...• .:..".• 4... . . ........-., _,„,„,,,,_______„4„.„ , •„.:-• k• -• .• • ..••••1•_.-f•rii ,,-;-4-r;,... §T):01;:•., "/ / ,i7 Pt:di/ •if /7/, 0 04.. •in • ,15,..,- T, 'f.,„„ifi///..,:!••••• - ft, /.• ''li//,,Syr-„/d/1 / if.//.// e.if.., . ' • ', .' • ././ts. T•14 : •,/oritii./1 a• . ,.. . , 1 -, " ir., ,ifog ,ov,. ., , . deol.:...1fi",...,1.j;h;'",_ I i./• hit. , THC tly.NON CO. ,. --r r 110. .°1 ,'6 lir,kA5 •,.C'S7 '' .....:".4.‘•',Iptior rZoliti.71. '144i '/• . •) ! ./,'•';,_.. .1 i I"'I ;:(,.;1,• •Vi ' i I .... AC.• "0'111. • . , 1. 441 thtsi' •"•7111 ••./....ti,aufdrit, . /.0.410.7„,/ •...e ..:„. • , .‘ ..•,, , i :,I• i •44„,,,4",„/ / .,, e 0 % ‘. . I -.•: I 7,101 i i ii. .101 "1'4 • LL • • \1 . 1 ‘ CI : . ID ...:1•11 1 ;.., I •,, BLV° • • , ..' \.1.„.1...t LI fin FIN !..1,...2,1- ' ....e ....,1 1 .- _ . . GT°r4 ••--- ' • •••• •c50 i.34.2- • NI S •ii Ili _J..'" • 1 , . • , . , •,„1../- , • o-I'D > . -v•r;.. . ii-s .1.,,o . ,t,. / 0 • . ,,... • , , • . . • •••••• • „.0, • LT.p. . .t AO;01.4 ............... ••........\ • • ; 601 • ailrli ad v\ip,S141,t‘''-' . • ^ . . . . .. . • . . . . . . . .. . . . . • • . . . . . . . . • • • .. . • • •,. . . . • • . .. . . . . .. •• . . • . • . . : • . - . • . •.:. . . 4011 ‘:!1 6% 6 0 ,oz rim 0 T I C E . . „, ( ° )i co SEPtE 1 . 13; PUBLIC MEETING , . . , . . . In RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING COUNCIL CHAMBERS L. 200 MILL AVENUE SOUTH • ., ,i AUGUST 30, 1989 7:00 1 ON BEGINNING ,AT A.M. P.M. . CONCERNING: The purpose of this public meeting is to review the application, to assist the City and its consultants in identifying environmental issues that need to be addressed in the EIS and to receive comments and answer questions regarding the environmental • review process for the application submitted by Lincoln • Properties Company N.C. , Inc., Bellevue, Washington, and noted below: i THE BLUFFS ECF; SA; R-044-89 Applicant seeks to rezone approximately 20.9 acres of property prom R-1, Residential Single-Family, to R-3, Residential Multi- amily, to allow the development of a 165 unit multiple-family complex with approximately 11.4 acres of the site remaining in undisturbed open space. ;:i l GENERAL LOCATION AND/DR ADDRESS: ;, The property is located east of Lake Washington Blvd. North and 9� west of I-405 at the 1600 block. 1 • • THIS NOTICE NOT TO BE REMOVED WITHOUT - - PROPER AUTHORIZATION I , RI .I:IkID HEREBY CERTIFY THAT l`( (2o ) oES OF ' THE. ABOVE DOCUMENT WERE POSTED BY ME IN r U.) T( ( 2.a ) CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON OR NEARBY THE DESCRIBED PROPERTY ON •,�( t?. oZ21 iq g� • ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a Notary Public, 'n and for the State of Washington • residing in eLA-n/ _, on the0��a/ SIGNED : . 11vn� day of r • DIViS!ON August 26 , 1989 LAN CITY OF RENTON 'AUG 2 9 1989 Mr . Don Erickson ECEIVE Zoning Administrator Community Development Department City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 Subject: EIS Scoping Input on "The Bluffs" proposed rezone Dear Don: I ' ll be out of state this coming Wednesday so I thought it best to submit these comments in writing. As you are aware, this group' s prime concern is keeping this area (Lake Wash Blvd in lower Kennydale) a livable R1 area. We oppose unmitigated improperly mitigated zoning changes in this area and any increases to traffic on the already overloaded Lake Washington Blvd. ( it destroys the quality of life and also provokes rezoning to denser categories ) . This issue caused a lawsuit that ended with a Stipulated Settlement No. 87-2-22224-1 . The Stipulated Settlement included, among other items , the following : o City of Renton Resolution 2708 that outlines the intentions of the City Council in protecting this neighborhood, along with some specific mitigation measures . o Section VIII of the Resolution 2708 that provides for Resolution 2708 as a SEPA policy statement. o Section 2 . 5 of the Stipulated Settlement that states, among other things , that "The parties agree that the terms of this stipulation may be enforced by any and all mechanisms allowed by law and that the terms of the stipulation have the force and effect of a final judgement entered by the King County Superior Court. " It is clear that this Stipulated Settlement goes far beyond simply protecting this neighborhood from traffic. It indicates that the City of Renton, in all good faith, feels their citizens residing in this neighborhood will be protected from further hardship and loss of quality of life caused by non R1 development. We expect that the EIS for this proposed development will adhere to this Stipulated Settlement . • As for as some of the issues that we think should be addressed in the EIS : 1 . We would like the City of Renton' s Shoreline Master Program and the Washington State Shoreline Protection Act to be complied with !//' when studying the various alternatives covered in the EIS . The geographical area covered in this EIS encompasses water and shore areas that are protected by these Acts . This includes Lake Washington and upland areas from this body of water. The following are among the many policies and goals contained in these Acts that we would like included: Under 4 . 01 .02 Policies : Al . Short-term economic gain or convenience in development should be evaluated in relationship to potential long-term effects on the shoreline. A2 . Preference should be given to those uses or activities which enhance the natural amenities of the shoreline and which depend on a shorelines location to provide public access to the shorelines . A7 . Shoreline uses and activities should be discouraged if they are objectionable due to noise or odor or if they create offensive or unsafe conditions in relation to reasonable and appropriate uses and activities . B. Those shoreline uses and activities which are not water related should be encouraged to relocate away from the shoreline . Under 4 .06 . 01 Goal : "Minimize motor vehicular traffic and encourage pedestrian traffic within the shorelines . " Under 4 . 06 . 02 Policies : A. Shoreline roadways should be scenic boulevards where possible and should be restricted to existing right-of-way. " 2 . The Lower Kennydale/Lake Washington Boulevard Area falls within the jurisdiction of these Acts . Two city, water oriented, parks exist on the boulevard and Lake Washington Boulevard closely follows the Lake Washington shoreline. In addition, a major bicycle trail from Bellevue flows on to the boulevard and is the only route bicyclists can take to get to Coulon Park and destinations south. These many recreation activities are clearly following the guidelines of the above Acts . The proposed rezone EIS should study the effect of this development on this environment. 3 . We would like the EIS to include a comprehensive study of the effect zoning and traffic have on the quality of life, economic wellbeing and property values of the residents in the geographical area of this EIS and those residents inextricably linked to the geography by Lake Washington Blvd. As an example of zoning impact: What effect does higher density zoning have on areas that are primarily single family residences? Do single family residence owners whose property is in an area with a higher density zoning come to realize that their only property value is in the value of the land and that the house on the property is worthless . . .quite likely costing them much of the only investment they have? Does this initiate the feeling that maintaining their single family residence is economic futility; causing them to stop making improvements to their property; and ultimately allow the property to fall into disrepair? Does the higher density zoning make it more difficult or impossible for single family residences to get home improvement ,loans . . . or make it difficult or impossible for prospective buyers to find mortgage money? Does this higher density zoning open up single family properties to long-term speculative buyers who are primarily interested in the value of the land. . .and consequently let the property fall into disrepair? Does the higher density zoning encourage apartment environments making the single family areas less tranquil . . .making the properties less prone to residential scale property appreciation? Or, does higher density zoning improve the quality of life , economic wellbeing, and property values of the single family residential owners? Or, does it have no effect on the single family neighborhoods? As an example of traffic impact: What effect does higher density traffic have on areas that are primarily single family in nature? Does the traffic force a gradual higher density rezone? In other words , does increased traffic cause the single family residence owner to quit making improvements on their property and gradually allow their property to fall into disrepair. . .realizing that the only value their property has is in the land itself. . . for the future use of higher density buildings? Does this increased traffic cause the property owner economic hardship because the value of the property no longer includes the value of the building? Does the increased traffic make the property less of a desirable location to live thereby preventing the property owner from realizing residential scale appreciation on the investment? Does the increased traffic make it more difficult to attain home improvement loans or cause prospective buyers difficulty in finding mortgage money? Or, does more traffic improve the quality of life, economic wellbeing, and property values of the single family residential owners? Or, does it have no effect on single family neighborhoods? The above questions for this item 3 are in no way meant to limit the scope or detail of this topic. . .but hopefully serve as an example of the kind of information we would like to see covered in the EIS . In a broader way we would like the EIS to cover the relationship between rezones and arterial systems and the redistribution of wealth in an established community. . . in terms of economic wellbeing, quality of life, and property values . We would furthermore like the EIS to address the city' s economic responsibility to the people whose economic well being they might harm with changes in zoning and arterial systems . Any zoning changes in an area like North Renton and Kennydale (comprised of heavy industry, office buildings, retail area, multi and single family density housing , etc. ) effects every aspect of the r built environment. An EIS for rezone in an area like North Renton and Kennydale must certainly take into account all the elements of the built environment as defined in WAC 197-11-444 ( 2 ) . 4 . Currently, there are two keys studies underway that effect the area of this proposed rezone : The upgrade to the comprehensive plan and the long awaited arterial study. The EIS should address these studies and indicate the whether it is in the public interest to grant a rezone before the studies are completed. The EIS should specifically state why the city shouldn' t place a moratorium on all development in the North Renton/Kennydale area until the comprehensive plan and the arterial plan are completed. To allow "helter skelter" growth without planning is not serving the needs of the people. 5 . The citizens and industry indebted themselves to develop Coulon Park. Coulon Park is already a very popular and congested area. . .with cars and pedestrians scattered everywhere . Is it fair to the citizens of Renton to have their largest and most beautiful park bordered with wall-to-wall high density apartments (the trailer park directly north of Marina Landing has already been rezoned multifamily and will one day, no doubt,. also sport high density apartments ) . The EIS should address the impact on the citizens investment and quality of recreation when their park is completely bordered with high density apartments . Was it the intent of the citizens to benefit land speculators? Or, was it the intent to support reasonable density structures? 6 . The steep slopes and water run off of this area make this a particular sensitive piece of property. If it proves suitable for development and if Lake Washington Blvd. is protected from traffic increases , wouldn't it make more sense to build a lower density, quality condominium project in that area? The EIS should specifically compare the impacts of a high density development to a low density development in th' area. Sin - elyyip Dar e _ / and President North Renton/Kennydale Neighborhood Defense Fund, Inc. C/O 3602 Lake Washington Blvd. N. Renton, WA 98056 f / CITY OF RENTON CURRENT PLANNING DIVISION COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING A PUBLIC MEETING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, CURRENT PLANNING DIVISION, IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS OF THE MUNICIPAL BUILDING, SECOND FLOOR, 200 MILL AVENUE SOUTH, RENTON, WASHINGTON, ON WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 30, 1989 AT 7: 00 PM IN ORDER TO IDENTIFY ISSUES TO BE ADDRESSED IN THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT (EIS) AND TO OBTAIN COMMENTS AND ANSWER QUESTIONS ON THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW PROCESS FOR THE FOLLOWING APPLICATION: THE BLUFFS ECF; SA; R-044-89 The purpose of this public meeting is to review the application, to assist the City and its consultants in identifying environmental issues that need to be addressed 'in the EIS and to receive comments, and answer questions regarding the environmental review process for this application submitted by Lincoln Properties Company N.C. , Inc. , Bellevue, Washington, to rezone approximately 20.9 acres of property from R-1, Residential Single-Family, to R-3 , Residential Multi-Family, to allow the development of a 165 unit multiple-family complex with approximately 11.4 acres of the site remaining in undisturbed open space. The property is located east of Lake Washington Blvd. North and west of I-405 at the 1600 block. Legal descriptions of the application above are on file in the Renton Planning Division, Community Development Department. ' ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID APPLICATION ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT THE PUBLIC MEETING ON WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 30, 1989 AT 7:00 PM TO ASK QUESTIONS, MAKE COMMENTS, AND REVIEW THE APPLICATION. Published: August 20, 1989 Z CA CI) � � -. no C, a 5 CD v, : '0 CD = G -* fD a. Do ti go C Q�Q (D = CM 'dlJta '�" CAD 7 CD `< CD s. CDD 6A .r N CD5 CD r. 0 "D " b ?? CD • CA lTJ 8 a Do rye. CD p � "� y co i•-• Ea = O a CD .� jv �. OM nD PD cD v t•' ISI 0. C O O O O '+ -. ? r. , 'b "r3 ^•• , — O o O cn Cp . ? 0 • ^h O 0 Pt 0 rp , E .D co p � N 0 ..cs _ ? r ti co • • co 0 N- .0 -. G' tic, p' C -n CD CD co G o el E7.1. o CD C 0 Q� p. • tmg4 .-SS 1 ICI A 0 p- � ?b ° iii,7d �--] F. sltil '7 t AD ro O b co -t p� n O o O �� a 0 w o �G o co o r r cco DT Y-- f�q c CrJ v- \\ '' z p: ICI 0' IV o cD n• I t rn cr aD 0 0.`< C a CD a n9 p- vJ r r CD co \ .< ova `< ^r m 0 � o � 4yo °' cCD � CD ry cp CD rt T ' co w co C M n • wo i ,o r C ma. 0 CT f c = 0ii \ N o ala a FtraD o m.ci b e ' O ti '" o , CCA O aa 70 � c o A. s a' _ CD xa ; o o• a � cp cro o 00 to -I a i7s ^ m ? ry *0 a- CD o o: ~ x � 5- arc � yc o ? Q \ co vo = = ti r a . k CA CA CITY OF RENTON following application: with approximately 11.4 acres of the site ment. CURRENT PLANNING DIVISION THE BLUFFS remaining in undisturbed open space. The All interested persons to said application COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ECF; SA; R-044-89 property is located east of Lake Washing- are invited to be present at the public meet- DEPARTMENT The purpose of this public meeting is to ton Blvd. North and west of 1-405 at the ing-on Wednesday, August 30, 1989 at NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING review the application, to assist the City 1600 block. 7:00 pm to ask questions,make comments, A public meeting will be held by the and its consultants in identifying environ- Legal descriptions of the application and review the application. tr, Renton Community Development Depart- mental issues that need to be addressed in above are on file in the Renton Planning Published in the Valley Daily News ment, Current Planning Division, in the the EIS and to receive comments and Division, Community Development Depart- August 20, 1989. R3682 Acct. #51067 c Council Chambers of the Municipal Build- answer questions regarding the environ- rn ing, Second Floor, 200 Mill Avenue South, mental review process for this application Renton, Washington, on Wednesday, submitted by Lincoln Properties Company August 30, 1989 at 7:00 PM in order to N.C., Inc., Bellevue,Washington,to rezone identify issues to be addressed in the Envi- approximately 20.9 acres of property from ronmental Impact Statement (EIS) and to R-1, Residential Single-Family,to R-3, Res- obtain comments and answer questions on idential Multi-Family, to allow the develop- the environmental review process for the ment of a 165 unit multiple-family complex ...::::.:..:.::.::::.:..::....:...:::::::::::.::::::........................................ • A PUBLIC MEETING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, CURRENT PLANNING DIVISION, IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS OF THE MUNICIPAL BUILDING, SECOND FLOOR, 200 MILL AVENUE SOUTH, RENTON, WASHINGTON, ON WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 30, 1989 AT 7:00 PM IN ORDER TO OBTAIN COMMENTS AND ANSWER QUESTIONS ON THE FOLLOWING APPLICATION: THE BLUFFS ECF; SA; R-044-89 The purpose of this public meeting is to review the application, to receive comments, and to answer questions regarding the application submitted by Lincoln Properties Company N.C., Inc., Bellevue, Washington to rezone approximately 20.9 acres of property from R-1, Residential Single-Family; to R-3, Residential Multi-Family, to allow the development of a 165 unit multiple family complex with approximately 11.4 acres of the site remaining in undisturbed open space. The property is located east of Lake Washington Blvd. North and west of I-405 at the 1600 block. Legal descriptions of the application above are on file in the Renton Planning Division, Community Development Department. • ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID APPLICATION ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT THE PUBLIC MEETING ON WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 30, 1989 AT 7:00 PM TO ASK QUESTIONS, MAKE COMMENTS, AND REVIEW THE APPLICATION. Published: August 18, 1989 t Mt ��� r7•;y,dIi�rf • N0 tv N tl.01 -, ,.n• H\aS .. soy • , n • 9, A,,,.:,,,,,,,„,, - . , ...„.., .-„\ ' -.." / / //' , • S 60\4--1. . ,_:r=k51,,del‘•''. .. 0 /..///1' /VA.(./ .1 '„1. •-• ,-. ..- ‘ % •- .- /.l/7 /.// in'l e- . -..it.fiz'' I 1.11 I.„„ L(4!)V 't .-: . „ t . • 0Aig . 17 • // /7///// /////04/7a.,... . i.4. ; , •q I I 1 k 1 i tf,'"/ 0 ! --. : :._--- . •1, . l i r� w ` St. i� 'OD NON 3 / `c , jot,I'd % a.. Q� 1'1 ;� s °\ ter. <,. ^ a H i 7 �,A , - •../10•, • N : 'iS11! . .• / / , •�N t .PI ifi: t •,. i i :1,Egg ! .y %�sl F/ • fifi� / i % ,. 4/ ;, f/i' j,�- s,,fi--• N, �:.� ,rrt ,, . ///7 ili.../././//1/2/"V//,'//.//1///s//:f•./4.,);:!4(4A411.11:/.&:.' .:--...--g------. ,:,-_,.....:_1-i ." ...... • r t . • 1 Z..I r: l'nj I r . . . ,,, 6 / "/ / // '/ ///i , 1,40 o & VI ` )i7:3g W 1 0 ifr _ -- y 1 !. t 1 . 1 •Q .un i t ' ' {P�° w • a -\- ' j (1 t y III rut ' '� r • f � `r - , • ,:y:/ _ ., •,fi...- i ! Hie°' iiir j ff i Nilli4elklptev - . hays is . ! it • ‘1111.22..,,Vf % 7 -. : Lta: ,.., \✓ O wry +' :1 ,� � ` ��► W 1 W r•t b73 , -,�, 121s V� /.11if7a 119rr15 0079 �::e....ct sr !-.a"� 4 ,b, _ oIllrr:� .. ,,. LI '4••• . .:...:.;.. .:.: :::• Qom_ O 3 •t .r:,.r1o[ 4' • �12� ... , • ----wO-- W W W W •! a 07ltw,f W W N N N N W W �: V r$022r W W W W, N y of I J co , .o 2 i( 7 W 11 N N N }�V d Ifr I t I I re:qj1 1 ❑ :le A. !J 4s .v 1, \ ore tr •i >e r s e ---,— ° 1__�- ° /08 TH - •-- ----- I it 1 I F, 1 r . CITY - F RENTON ieLL ;; '•. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor Planning Division August 18, 1989 Colin Quinn Director, Land Use Planning _ 1745 114th Avenue SE, Suite 100 Bellevue, WA 98004 RE: The Bluffs Located in the 1600 Block of Lake Washington Blvd. ECF; SA; R-044-89 Dear Mr. Quinn: • I would like to take this opportunity to let you know that the public meeting regarding your application (as referenced above) to rezone approximately 20.9 acres of property from R-1, Residential Single-Family, to R-3, Residential Multi-Family, to allow the development of a 165 unit multiple-family complex with approximately 11.4 acres of the site remaining in undisturbed open space will be held on Wednesday, August 30, 1989 at 7:00 PM in the Council Chambers, Second Floor, Renton Municipal Building. The purpose of this public meeting will be to allow the public to review the application as well as to assist the City and its consultants in identifying environmental issues that need to be addressed in the EIS, and to receive comments and answer questions regarding the environmental review process for the application. If you have any questions please feel free to call me. Sincerely, Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator DKE:mjp cc: Darrell Igelmund, President North Renton/Kennydale Neighborhood Defense Fund 3602 Lake Washington Blvd. North Renton; WA 98056 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2550 Facsimile (206) 235-2513 1 I I 1 al Iff R.W. Thorpe & Associates, Inc. ❑ Planning • Landscape • Environmental • Economics Principals: Jon Potter Robert W. Thorpe, AICP Associates: July 17, 1989 IA Jeff Buckland Lenora Blauman, Sr. Planner el, , [i6 _.'iaiLi3 P Planning Department City of Renton i _ JUL 1• 8 1989 • Municipal Building I n i 200 Mill Avenue South E C Lrrj`ll Le Renton, Washington 98055 RE: WBE and MBE participation requirements Dear Lenora: Thank you again for the opportunity to make a presentation to you and Mr. Erickson this last Thursday. I received a call from David Dean this Friday afternoon. Mr. Dean indicated the City of Renton does not have an ordinance requiring participation by women and or minority-owned firms. He did indicate that the City does encourage their participation but it is not required. We have regularly utilized Olympic Blueprinting or Waterfront Reprographics on all of our environmental impact statements. Olympic is a WBE and Waterfront is a MBE. Thank you again for your consideration of our proposal. ` \•urs very \ fn Potter, Principal JP/cja • Seattle: 1300 Alaska Bldg. •2nd&Cherry•Seattle, WA 98104•(2063 624-6239 Anchorage: Suite 503• 1110 West Sixth Avenue•Anchorage, AK 99501 •(907)278-0005 1111 1111P,a . =t. • HE FERRIS COMPANY June 20, 1989 rt.!.. :'.:...: :3,toiLaf1�11�J Don Erickson CITY i=f? 'NION Zoning Administrator jl JUN 2 1 1989 City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South111' .E (r� EIIVE Renton, WA 98055 l� Re: The Bluffs EIS Dear Don: The Ferris Company is pleased to submit this letter of interest to. provide EIS services on Lincoln Property Company's The Bluffs. project. The Ferris Company is available and interested in providing professional environmental services for this project. We would propose to use Dodds Engineers and Golder Associates to handle drainage and slope issues, respectively; further, we propose to use The Transpo Group or TDA, Inc. for transportation analysis at your discretion. Qualifications packages for The Ferris Company and each of the other technical consultants have been submitted previously to your department as part of submittals on previous projects. As you are aware, Dodds, Golder and TDA provided technical expertise on the Lexington Ridge EIS project. Based on our current and projected workload, The Ferris Company would be able to meet your timeframe for issuance of the Draft EIS, as outlined in your RFQ letter. If you need further information, please call me. We look forward to working with you again. Sincerely, Michael J. Blumen Vice President MJB:hd • Key Bank Building,Suite 300 10655 NE 4th Street Bellevue,WA 98004 206/462-7650 1 q June 18 , 1989 H LJ J U N 2 1 1989 !'V -1 .E C I !l Mr. Don Erickson Zoning Administrator City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 Opposition to Lower Kennydale Rezone Dear Don: It has come to our attention that there has been an application submitted for rezoning from R1 to R3 a 21 acre parcel located on Lake Washington Blvd. in Kennydale ( 165 proposed units) . We wish to go on record that there is strong opposition to this rezone for the following reasons: o Traffic. This Lower Kennydale residential area is already terrorized by high volumes of traffic. The morning commute on Lake Washington Blvd. starts at 5 : 30 am. There is no excuse for this. . .especially when a freeway is a couple of blocks away. Without the existing stop signs we would be washed away. In this environment a proposal for adding significantly more traffic to the boulevard is preposterous. o Negative effect on existing single family residences. It has been well established that highly transient populations common to apartment complexes have numerous ill effects on single family neighborhoods (listen to the gripes from many areas of Kent and Renton in terms of crime, litter, noise, etc. ) . Comprehensive plans have been upheld as a ligitimate way for cities to coordinate development. The comprehensive plan shows the proposed rezone area as single family residential and we see no ligitimate reason to change it. o Enough multi-family already exists. The large Marina Landing complex was enough of a contribution for this residential community to make to multi-family housing. Also, the large area just north of Marina Landing (trailer park) has already been Mr. Don Erickson June 18, 1989 Page Two allowed a rezone for higher density development. At the time, the City Council gave assurances that there would be no more zoning changes . Please add us to your mailing list so that we do not miss any important deadlines associated with this impact process . You s v ry truly, Darrell Igelmund President North Renton/Kennydale Neighborhood Defense Fund 271-9567 4i ® CITY OF RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor Planning Division June 16, 1989 TO: Interested Persons/Firms: RE: Lincoln Property Company The Bluffs File ECF,R,SA-044-89 • SUBJECT: Statement of Interest & Qualifications The City of Renton is currently seeking qualified candidates to assist in preparing an Environmental Impact Statement for the Lincoln Property Company for a proposed multiple family development on a 20.9 acre site. The project will require approvals of a rezone, a site plan and proposed street vacation. The applicant's proposal is a 165 unit apartment complex in eight (8), four (4) story buildings on 9.5 acres of the site. The remaining 11.4 acres are to remain in undisturbed open space (See attached information packet). Preliminary scoping has identified the following issues that will need to be addressed in the draft EIS document: o Earth The majority of the site appears to have slopes of 25% or more with a large portion of the site with slopes of 40% or more. The site has also been identified as being a sensitive area with respect to erosion, landslides and seismic hazard. o Water Storm water drainage has been identified as a critical issue. The site may be on the periphery of an area identified as an aquifer recharge area. o Flora and Fauna The subject property is heavily treed and concern has been raised that development of the project be done in a manner which retains as much of the vegetation as possible on the site and addresses the needs of the wildlife on the site. 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2550 Facsimile (206) 235-2513 Statement of Interest a-, . qualifications --. The Bluffs June 16, 1989 Page 2 o Traffic Lake Washington Blvd is a heavily travelled corridor, collecting traffic from the neighborhoods as well pass through traffic from I-405. Concerns have been raised with respect to impacts on City Streets as well as additional traffic on I-405 raised by WSDOT. Metro has responded that the EIS should evaluate the potential for Transportation Demand Management. o Recreation The applicant has discussed placing a recreation building on-site for future residents. The EIS needs to address solutions to the recreational needs of the future residents of the complex to ensure the development does not rely on the facilities at Gene Coulon Park in the immediate vicinity of the development, to majority of the recreational needs of the residents. This section should also include a discussion of the proposed City trail along the eastern property line. o Public Services Due to the topography of the site and the proposed type of development, concerns shave been raised as to the impact the development will have on police and fire services to the site. If your firm is interested in being considered for this work, please send a letter of interest and statement of qualifications to the Environmental Review Committee, in care of me, no later than June 26, 1989. Preliminary estimates for finishing the draft EIS is approximately October 16, 1989. If you have any questions about this project please call me or Jeanette Samek-McKague at 235-2550. Si Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator DKE:McK:mjp jrnETRD/..46 Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle Exchange Building • 821 Second Ave. • Seattle,WA 98104-1598 May 31, 1989 CITY OF CjEWON D , may 31 19e9 Environmental Review Committee c/o Donald K. Erickson C lE Q pp Zoning Administrator U Planning Department 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 Determination of Non-Significance File No. : ECF-044-89 Lincoln Property Company N.C. Inc. Dear Environmental Review Committee: Metro staff has reviewed this proposal and anticipates no significant impacts to its wastewater facilities. Public Transportation The EIS should specifically evaluate the potential for Transportation Demand Management (TDM) actions to partially mitigate traffic impacts. It should also specify the physical and programmatic measures that would be needed to assure that the TDM actions are successful. Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment. Sincerely, Gregory M. Bush, Manager Environmental Planning Division • GMB:wsg4718 � Washington State Duane Berentson �I/ Department of Transportation Secretary of Transportation District 1 15325 S.E.30th Place Bellevue,Washington 98007 1'.:,:1a Wiz;tibj 11� May 24, 1989 CITY OF�irTOf� fMAY 2 6 1989 EC 0 VC Mr. Don Erickson, Zoning Administrator Planning Division Environmental Review Committee Community Development Department 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 Scope o CIS - I-405 The Bluffs Dear Mr. Erickson: This letter is in response to the Determination of Significance and request for comments on Scope of EIS review we received from the city of Renton. A development of this size and location will have an impact on the state's roadway system. The Transportation section of the DEIS should include traffic impacts to the SR 900/I-405 (Sunset) interchange, any state highway the trip distribution' indicates will be impacted, and any mitigating measures deemed necessary. The housing density of this development meets minimum thresholds for transit service. The relationship between the location of the housing within the parcel to the street system and existing or potential transit service is critical to the potential use of the system. These relationships should be discussed in the EIS. Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this proposal. If you have any question, please feel free to contact this office. Sinc rely ife/. 1 6r JERRY B. SCHUTZ Development Planning Engineer CG:ng 1/CGDESTB CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE AND REQUEST FOR COMMENTS ON SCOPE OF EIS FILE NUMBER(S) : ECF-044-89 ; SA-044-89; R-044-89 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: THE BLUFFS Application to rezone approximately 20.9 acres of property from R-1, Residential Single-Family, to R-3, Residential Multi-Family, to allow the development of 165 multiple family complex with approximately 11.4 acres of the site remaining in undisturbed open space. PROPONENT: Lincoln Property Company N.C. , Inc. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: The property is located east of Lake Washington Blvd. North and west of I- 405 at the 1600 block. EIS REQUIRED. The lead agency has determined this proposal is likely to have a significant impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is required under RCW 43 . 21C. 030(2) (c) and will be prepared. An environmental checklist or other materials indicating likely environmental impacts can be reviewed at our offices. LEAD AGENCY: Environmental Review Committee, City of Renton The lead agency has identified the following areas for discussion in the EIS: Earth, Water (Storm Drainage) , Flora, Fauna, Traffic, Conditional Use, Recreation, and Public Services. SCOPING: Agencies, affected tribes, and members of the public are invited to comment on the scope of the EIS. You may comment on alternatives, mitigation measures, probable significant adverse impacts, and licenses of other approvals that may be required. Your comments must be submitted in writing and received before June 5, 1989. Responsible Official; Environmental Review Committee c/o Don Erickson, Zoning Administrator Planning Division Community Development Department 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 APPEAL: You may appeal this determination of significance in writing pursuant to RMC 4-3016 accompanied by a $75. 00 appeal fee no later than 5: 00 p.m. May 29, 1989, to: Renton Hearing Examiner City Clerk 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 You should be prepared to make specific factual objections. Contact the above office to read or ask about the procedures for SEPA appeals. PUBLICATION DATE: May 15, 1989 DATE OF DECISION: May 10, 1989 SIGNATURES; 'Ken N 6 Th7Lynn G tma Co tini. --Development------__ Public orks Director • Director NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a Determination of Significance for the following project: THE BLUFFS ECF;SA;R-044-89 Application to rezone approximately 20.9 acres of property from R-1, Residential Single-Family, to R- 3, Residential Multi-Family, to allow the development of a 165 unit multiple family complex with approximately 11.4 acres of the site remaining in undisturbed open space. The property is located east of Lake Washington Blvd. North and west, of I-405 at the 1600 block. Further information regarding this action is available in the Community Development Department, Municipal Buildling, Renton, Washington, 235-2550, Agencies, tribes, and members of the public are invited to comment on the scope of the EIS. Comments must be submitted to the City of Renton by 5 p.m. on June 5, 1989. Any appeal of the ERC action must be filed with the Renton Hearing Examiner by 5 p.m. on May 29, 1989. Published: May 15, 1989 � •fit _ oTicE ENVIRONMENTAL DECLARATION APPLICATION NO. ECF-044-89, SA-044-89, R-44-89 APPLICANT THE BLUFFS PROPOSED ACTION APPLICATION TO REZONE APPROXIMATELY 20.9 ACRES OF PROPERTY FROM R-1, RESIDENTIAL SINGLE—FAMILY, TO R-3, RESIDENTIAL MULTI—FAMILY, TO ALLOW THE DEVELOPMENT OF 165 UNIT MULTIPLE FAMILY COMPLEX WITH APPROXIMATELY 11.4 ACRES OF THE SITEiffikili XL War-VOW AKjDRESS THE PROPERTY IS LOCATED EAST OF LAKE WASHINGTON BLVD. NO. AND WEST OF I-405 AT THE 1600 BLOCK. POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (E.R.C.) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION IN DOES DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT WILL WILL NOT BE REQUIRED. THE CITY OF RENTON WILL NOT ACT ON THIS PROPOSAL FOR 15 DAYS FROM THE DATE BELOW. COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY AN APPEAL OF THE ABOVE DETERMINATION MAY BE FILED WITH THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER BY 5:00 P.M., MAY 29, 1989 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON PLANNING DIVISION AT 235-2550. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION. A CERTIFICATION • 11 T, L.IhJQ , HEREBY CERTIFY THAT Ny (0 ) COPIES OF IIE ABOVE DOCUMENT WERE POSTED BY ME IN '36( ( D CONSPICUOUST. LACES ON OR NEARBY THE DESCRIBED PROPERTY ON rylL- .3 l7 IqFct • 11. ATTEST: Subscribed end sworn to before me, a Notary Public, In end for the State of Washington • residing 9 in E 4 1'7'7R/ on the /7 ZQ �L 1 _ „f day • of I q .SIGNED : L4II c�. I 111- 0 0 CITY OF RENTON DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor PLANNING DIVISION May 15, 1989 • Washington State Department of Ecology Environmental Review Section Mail Stop PV-11 Olympia, WA 98504 Re: Environmental Determinations • Transmitted herewith are copies of Environmental Determinations issued on May 10, 1989: DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED PACCAR DEFENSE SYSTEMS DEMOLITION PERMIT ECF; SP-094-88 (RECONSIDERATION OF CONDITION #4) Applicant seeks a permit to: a) demolish and remove structures to concrete foundations (including removal of asbestos and hazardous waste materials); b) remove utilitylines within foundations, pits and conduits; c) remove soil samples for testing; d) place approximately 2,305 cu.yds. of clean fill in sub-terranean concrete equipment-housing pits vacated and exposed during the demolition process.; The property is located at 1400 North Fourth Street. The fifteen (15) day comment period for these projects will end on May 29, 1989. Following the end of the comment period, the City will finalize it's Determination unless comments received require a reevaluation. Following the finalization of the Determination, there is a required 14 day appeal period. DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE THE BLUFFS $`ECF;SA;R-044-89 • Application to rezone approximately 20.9 acres of property from R-1, Residential Single- Family, to R-3, Residential Multi-Family, to allow the development of a 165 unit multiple family complex with approximately 11.4 acres of the site remaining in undisturbed open space. The property is located east of Lake Washington Blvd. North and west of I-405 at the 1600 block. The applicant requested an early determination pursuant to SEPA regulations, therefore, no checklist was submitted for review. Further information regarding this action is available in the.Community Development Department, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington, 235-2550. Agencies, affected tribes and members of the public are invited to comment on the scope of the EIS. Comments must be submitted to the City of Renton by 5:00 p.m. on June 5, 1989. 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2550 Environmental Determinations May 15, 1989 Page 2 If you have questions, please call Jeanette Samek-McKague or me at 235-2550. Sincerely, Q.DO"fit112-----"‘/ Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator DKE:mjp cc: , Mr. Gerald W. Marbett, King County Bldg. & Land Division Mr. Gregory M. Bush, Metro Department of Wildlife • Mr. Joe Robels, Department of Fisheries Mr. James L. Lutz, P.E., WSDOT, District 1 j I • • • ' I I f } a 0 CITY OF RENTON DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor PLANNING DIVISION May 12, 1989 Colin Quinn Director, Land Use Planning 1745 114th Avenue SE, Suite 100 Bellevue, WA 98004 Re: THE BLUFFS Located east of Lake Washington Blvd. North and west of I-405 at the 1600 block ECF; SA; R-044-89 Dear Mr. Quinn: Transmitted herewith is a copy of the Determination of Significance for the above referenced project. If you have any questions, please call me at 235-2550. Sincerely, Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator DKE:mjp S 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2550 NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a Determination of Significance for the following project: THE BLUFFS ECF;SA;R-044-89 Application to rezone approximately 20.9 acres of property from R-1, Residential Single-Family, to R- 3, Residential Multi-Family, to allow the development of a 165 unit multiple family complex with approximately 11.4 acres of the site remaining in undisturbed open space. The property is located east of Lake Washington Blvd. North and west of I-405 at the 1600 block. Further information regarding this action is available in the Community Development Department, Municipal Buildling, Renton, Washington, 235-2550, Agencies, tribes, and members of the public are invited to comment on the scope of the EIS. Comments must be submitted to the City of Renton by 5 p.m. on June 5, 1989. Any appeal of the ERC action must be filed with the Renton Hearing Examiner by 5 p.m. on May 29, 1989. Published: May 15, 1989 • • .k CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE AND REQUEST FOR COMMENTS ON SCOPE OF EIS FILE NUMBER(S) : ECF-044-89; SA-044-89; R-044-89 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: THE BLUFFS Application to rezone approximately 20.9 acres of property from R-1, Residential Single-Family, to R-3 , Residential Multi-Family, to allow the development of 165 multiple family complex with approximately 11.4 acres of the site remaining in undisturbed open space. PROPONENT: Lincoln Property Company N.C. , Inc. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: The property is located east of Lake Washington Blvd. North and west of I- 405 at the 1600 block. EIS REQUIRED. The lead agency has determined this proposal is likely to have a significant impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is required under RCW 43 .21C. 030 (2) (c) and will be prepared. An environmental checklist or other materials indicating likely environmental impacts can be reviewed at our offices. LEAD AGENCY: Environmental Review Committee, City of Renton The lead agency has identified the following areas for discussion in the EIS: Earth, Water (Storm Drainage) , Flora, Fauna, Traffic, Conditional Use, Recreation, and Public Services. SCOPING: Agencies, affected tribes, and members of the public are invited to comment on the scope of the EIS. You may comment on alternatives, mitigation measures, probable significant adverse impacts, and licenses of other approvals that may be required. Your comments must be submitted in writing and received before June 5, 1989. Responsible Official; Environmental Review Committee c/o Don Erickson, Zoning Administrator Planning Division Community Development Department 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 APPEAL: You may appeal this determination of significance in writing pursuant to RMC 4-3016 accompanied by a $75. 00 appeal fee no later than 5: 00 .p.m. May 29, 1989, to: Renton Hearing Examiner City Clerk 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 You should be prepared to make specific factual objections. Contact the above office to read or ask about the procedures for SEPA appeals. PUBLICATION DATE: May 15, 1989 DATE OF DECISION: May 10, 1989 SIGNATURES; en N Lynn G tma Co --Ueve opme Public orks Director Director 411'N OT IC E ENVIRONMENTAL DECLARATION APPLICATION NO. ECF-044-89, SA-044-89, R-44-89 APPLICANT THE BLUFFS PROPOSED ACTION APPLICATION TO REZONE APPROXIMATELY 20.9 ACRES OF PROPERTY FROM R-1, RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY, TO R-3, RESIDENTIAL MULTI-FAMILY, TO ALLOW THE DEVELOPMENT OF 165 UNIT MULTIPLE FAMILY COMPLEX WITH APPROXIMATELY 11.4 ACRES OF THE SITE x.• Ale DRESS THE PROPERTY IS LOCATED EAST. OF LAKE WASHINGTON BLVD. NO. AND WEST OF I-405 AT THE 1600 BLOCK. POSTED TO NOTIFY. INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (E.R.C.) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION 5‹ DOES DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT WILL WILL NOT BE REQUIRED. THE CITY OF RENTON WILL NOT ACT ON THIS PROPOSAL FOR 15 DAYS FROM THE DATE BELOW. COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY AN APPEAL OF THE ABOVE DETERMINATION MAY BE FILED WITH THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER BY 5:00 P.M., MAY 29, 1989 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON PLANNING DIVISION AT 235-2550. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION. CERTIFICATION • - ( , OgRKI , HEREBY CERTIFY 5 J THAT C( . D ) UPIES OF • FHE ABOVE DOCUMENT WERE POSTED BY ME IN 2515( (to ) CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON OR NEARBY THE DESCRIBED PROPERTY ON • ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a Notary Public, in end for the State of Washington • residing in �q � � on the �� SIGNEDJ T`�a ,• • dayof I I s----' a ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE 10:30 AM Renton Municipal Building May 10, 1989 3rd Floor Conference room MINUTES ATTENDING: Ken Nyberg, Acting Community Development Director; Lynn Guttmann, Public Works Director; Larry Springer, Planning Manager; Don Erickson, Zoning Administrator; Jim Gray substituting for Glen Gordon, Fire Marshall; Jeannette Samek-McKague, Senior Planner; and.Margaret Pullar, Secretary. CALL TO ORDER: The meeting was called to order by Mr. Nyberg. i NEW PROJECTS THE BLUFF ECF; SA-044189 EARLY ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION PER SEPA Rezoning of a 20.9 acre site from R-1 Residential to R-3 Residential. Approximately 9.5 acres of the properly is to be developed area. The remaining 11.4 acres is proposed to remain undisturbed open space. A portion of the total site acreage will involve vacation of unbuilt public right of way. The proposal consists of approximately 165 multi-family dwelling units contained in 4pproximately eight buildings. The overall site density is 7.5 units/acres. The property is comprised of numerous lots or portions of lots bounded on the east by I-405, on the west by Lake!Washington Blvd. SE, on the south by SE 110th (if extended), and North 21st (if extended) on the north. I Discussion: Mr. Erickson stated that the developer, Lincoln Property Company, Inc., met with himself and Mr. Springer to review the impacts and issues associated with the development of this property.) The proponent outlined the primary areas of concern as soils/slopes, traffic, and drainage. Mrs. Erickson stated that the proponent will be applying for an appropriate rezone and approvals to develop the property and will be submitting detailed plans which illustrate the proposal as required for site plan approval. In order to expedite the approval process, the developer is requesting that a Determination of Significance be issued by the City of Renton in order to comrience the SEPA scoping process. Mr. Erickson advised that SEPA regulations allow this early determination process. In terms of the City's pending Open Space bond issue that's being put together, he advised that John Morris pointed out that there is the old railroad right-of-waythat comes through this property. Mr. Morris' group is listing that easement as one of the properties they would like to see acquired as part of the bond issue for bike trail extension purposes. I Decision: M . Springer made a motion, seconded by Mr. Nyberg, to issue a Determination of Significance And to include the noted easement item as a scoping issue in the EIS process. The motion carrie/d. RECONSIDERATION PACCAR D FENSE SYSTEMS - DEMOLITION ECF-094-88 Applicant seeks a permit to: a) demolish and remove structures to concrete foundations (including removal of asbestos and hazardous waste materials); b) remove utilitylines within foundations, bits and conduits; c) remove soil samples for testing; d) place approximately 2,305 cu.yds. of clean fill in sub-terranean concrete equipment-housing pits vacated and exposed during the demolition process. Property is located at 1400 North Fourth Street. Applicant requests a change in Condition 4, regarding the hours of operation, from 8AM to 3PM to 7AM to 7PM. I I Discussion: , Mr. Erickson! reviewed the applicant's letter requesting a change in Condition 4 of the mitigation measures, as outlined in the City's October 17, 1988 notice of determination, regarding the hours of operation available for trucking. The applicant indicates that the permit conditions regarding said trucking hours will negatively affect the project schedule and may adversely affect the surrounding locale. They note that, as the permit now stands, the contractor will need to maximize the number of trucks serving the site during the hours of 8AM and 3PM and, extend the duration of the demolition project by as much as 25%. The change request is to run essentially the same number of trucks as originally requested but rather than • • Minutes - Environmental Rev Committee May 10, 1989 ° Page 2 increasing thes impact on the traffic by forcing them into the short time frame of 8AM to 3PM, allow them to work over a longer daily period. They indicated that a reasonable time restriction wo ld be the operating hours of the landfill plus one hour before and one hour after (i.e. 7AM to 1PM). In addition, the contractor will try to schedule his trucking operations to reduce the number of trucks on the roads during the commuting periods. This will allow full utilization of equipment, personnel, and summer construction hours. The benefits will be: 1) reduced traffi impact on the surrounding streets, 2) construction workers will commute outside rush hour, 3) fewer trucks will be traveling at any one time, 4) reduce the duration of the demolition pr ject by as much as 25%, and 5) permit the completion of the major portion of the demolition pr ject while schools are out and commuting traffic is at a minimum. . Mr. Erickson then referred to a memo from Gary Norris, Traffic Division, regarding PACCAR's request for a change of hours. He recommends that the contractor could haul on the streets from 7AM to 3:15PM and 4:30PM to 7PM with haul routes limited to arterial streets north of North 4th Street, Park Avenue North to the east, North Park Drive to the south, and I- 405 to the wet. Since the primary access to the site will be North 6th at Garden Avenue North, the memo noted that E & H signalized this intersection (with the exclusion of the east leg) as a part 'of their mitigation program. The east leg was not signalized as PACCAR would not provide right-of-way to allow proper pole and controller cabinet location. The memo indicates that la serious safety condition will be created by allowing trucks to enter this intersection without seeing the signal indication. He recommends that ERC require PACCAR to either complete the signalization of.this intersection or provide off-duty police officers to direct traffic. Decision: Following a discussion of these issues Mr. Springer made a motion, seconded by Mr. Nyberg, to rel+ise Condition 4 of the Determination of Non-Significance issued on October 12, 1988 as foliovys: The motion carried. 1., Hauling hours revised to: 7AM-3:15PM and 4:30 PM-10PM, (10PM coincides with the city's current noise ordinance), as long as the developer follows the haul routes which have been established and approved. Said routes are limited exclusively to arterial streets located north of North 4th, Park Avenue to the east,,North Park Drive to the south, and I-405 to the west. Note to Applicant: The Public Works Department reserves the right to modify the hauling hours, if problems arise from the new times. • 2. Reinf I rce the haul routes.. 3. An off-duty police officer be required to direct traffic at the intersection of North 6th at Ga den Ave. N. (preferable) or the signalization be completed at said intersection. CONTINUATIION VALLEY MEDICAL PARKING GARAGE/ PHASE II ECF-006-89 REVIEW #3 Application site plan review for approval of Phase II of the Valley Medical Center Parking • Garage. Phase II has 253,445 square.feet and will provide an additional 797 parking stalls. The property'is located at 400 South 43rd Street, at the northern portion of the Valley Medical Center Campus. Discussion: Ms. Samek-McKague submitted Review #3 noting that the majority of the items listed in DonlMonoghan's memo of last week, regarding the status of the South 43rd Street LID, remain the same. The only item changed was the date for the plans to be submitted. The plans " that were ex ected last Friday, May 5th, will be submitted by today, May 10th. In addition, the Public W rks Department is preparing,an environmental review application for the South 43rd Street Li D. They expect to submit the application today to Current Planning. Finally, she advised that alley Medical Center has not as yet submitted a report requested by Staff for an update on th parking, inventory that was to be submitted last Monday, May 5th. Mr. Erickson)reported that he and Ken Nyberg visited the Valley Medical Center last Thursday, May 4th, an that VMC representatives indicated that they are not going to proceed at this time with Phase 2 of the parking lot but would like ERC to issue a determination anyway. Discussion followed regarding: 1) requiring VMC to prepare a generic EIS for future development after which specific on-site development projects can be reviewed, 2) traffic r Minutes = Environmental Rev', Committee • May 10, 1989. , 0 Page 3 impacts and p tterns as it relates to this intense medical node area, and 3) the need to capture the conceptual (or institutional) picture, not just the smaller scale projects of the whole development. Mr. Springer advised that a master planning process had been proposed several years ago and is still pending in the Planning and Development Committee. Further discussion ensued regarding a master plan ing process with a consensus that it may be time to resurrect some of these ideas. • Ms. Guttmann discussed the benefits and various options of an internal TSM in Renton with a transfer facility. Following further discussion it was agreed that Ms. Guttmann schedule a meeting with the appropriate Metro personnel to discuss this issue. DISCUSSION As a result o_f the slope issue identified during the The Bluff project proposal discussed earlier, a discussion ensued regarding the identification of potential slope problems, available inventory of soils categorization, emergency management programs, delegation and awareness of staff responsibility during emergencies, and spill and toxic containment response. It was agreed that Mr, Nyberg would discuss these items with the Fire Chief who is the City's designated Preparedness Officer and who is very receptive to improving the existing program through appropriate training and information dissemination. MEETING ADJOURNED AT 11:20 AM . • • • • low 4114CJTi PLANNING DIVISION LINCOLN PROPERTY COMPANY N.C.,INC. CITY OF RENTON .?Cu'.�`.v w" 'vatosk" ;m + ''se,a,,,�c� zt •`;� P.a�.,. .�% `4' �? lr ',�±r :: tz*k 4s� ,' i y6�".... ir'*k -a s'�Sk;r '/. D MAY 2 _ti 22 1989 ED April 28, 1989 1pll IC Mr. Ron Nelson Director Zoning and Building City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue S. Renton, WA 98055 RE: THE BLUFFS • REZONE AND SITE PLAN APPROVAL SEPA DETERMINATION Dear Mr. Nelson: Lincoln Property Company met with Don Erickson and Larry Springer to review the impacts and issues associated with the development of the subject property. We will be applying for an appropriate rezone and approvals to develop the property and will be submitting detailed plans which illustrate our proposal as required for site plan approval. In order to expedite the approval process, Lincoln Property Company is requesting that a Determinationnsof Significance be issued by the City of Renton in order to commence the SEPA scoping process. We understand that the primary areas of concern are soils/slopes, traffic and drainage. We are attaching a project description, vicinity map and legal description for your use in the scoping process. We are anxious to move ahead on this project as quickly as possible. If we can answer questions or provide additional information, please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, " Colin Quinn Director, Land Use Planning CQ:j p Enclosures cc: E,D_ori‘j,Eti'dk`sorg. Larry Springer John Phillips 1745 114th Avenue S.E. Suite 100 Bellevue. WA 98004 (206) 455-4813 .. 4110 THE BLUFFS Project Description Rezoning of a 20.9-acre site from R-1 Residential to R-3 Residential. Approximately 9.5 acres of the property is to be developed area. The remaining 11. 4 acres is proposed to remain undisturbed open space. A portion of the total site acreage will involve vacation of unbuilt public right of way. The proposal consists of approximately 165 multifamily dwelling units contained in approximately eight buildings. The overall site density is 7.5 units/acres. Additionally, the proposal will include a recreational building and parking for an estimated 330 cars. The residential structures will be contained in four-story buildings with a maximum height of 45 feet above finished grade. Primary site access is proposed from Lake Washington Boulevard S.E. The proposal will be reviewed through the site plan approval process by the City to insure compliance with the design standards of the City. .Jf J•J ,..,..,I, - v / - rt loin 1i��fl �`+ v j ` I�5� 7a 1p�aL ; �` O�•9• tl7NNl - y n;.ept, M • N �oad,N o, ,,,+ r, �� O\� • a �Mj1 ..• ~v•~ -• -' '':Ft(' 00 -� /. /'�'°��i I 1- . is . �•/ /,/�//9.,r, ..ie"i � 1 �Nfilm"'�.'}r i •� ` %: •� a '1Qi 41 • /b w ' / ..•iir;o,/Nc�nr il.'/ • 1` �r.�7 ' r `�r r. :!I 1 i.+ �t ) %/ 411'e • iI/ / 179 I •r7 • icc••aw •• J. : :n '! i-'� ° - O7 NONY12il 3H� / % �; 'q•t1'Jf 3 /1�7iJ'a / r•+//��' �..4:i1 jS!Ape ii/ vM i�' • . /� r •7;` ►t d:F . / iUVpf I' i " / ar ``O/1' ,J.•'!f...• I., �.'�l 'r• ..f1 p.,r'• • /" i j/a•l, •• / 4•S 7/ •r/ % y• e. ./,;-f l/ , �y' ' ^w•,iSc-?'i w, 1::1 - rr•f • / j0 of r//// /rf r/ // //r ,. r / / a .,l.' '/r,'• . ! �'' r 1--„ .p .:•t... " -� I ti r r - . ////. /// 1,•7 , // , ' /� 4'.�; 64�_'// / ! ,yam •_�. • - - - w_: - • 4C/ _t ////,� �/i / .*• I/ ��/ !4.,,Y/,v_...�J1jp. /�..•': %�� • IP :`• s /a� r s+�r..'itJ41 x �•' iv �..s w t. ,. , , J. • r // •.. // •,J Al:f. a /// J." %�� O a ::,Q ti l•V r • ' �e - z '^ 4, r / // b '/!/// // /'e, 'e.'/ r/r;/ r :f' yl� ^ \,1 • I ! ,• nn r `� v I .... .. .-.. - _.. - / % / // i '/ / // , ''fNyA O `6! �./1 4 i }j1 .�; t''Tql I. o g \ / �� ' �y i 110 W r s. •%/ / ` a-r� j /. Nl,..di'• 'Nl�N ��d '/� Ir' •. - , =�:.•c^� _. E is I: .f• '/ yin' �1/r2 .,� ` ° /, J.�° ill Air • i• .t.i W W �, .r • ,J ,• r I x , "',,fir. N(N S rf r f� �' •i .(� v; '1 �.�, r. o ' P 7 o -s.es , , -. -1' • y • rut •- 1 ,! 1 A - 1 _0 1: - .. .APP 07.., I''-'- 1 1 . _ . p 1 to il• •t�M� N.I.,...likNit ` : ^ W I p N fn V �� �011: < �, •13 W O .• "� I ,�� • W W M �'v •1 -tn� iifittiale y,� IIIII `40 /.1I:fr� 1191i1s 0009 '-::o,•"ct se••t/ %o"'� • [� �� rH ----to to • I . c -D' - • !JQI. _ . _AVM _—S`�---L ±_ .: ±.. L_. ;--- -- - - - - -----°-- ° /08TH L • Hi l ; , CITY OF RE TON ECEEIVE MAY 1 1989 BUILDING DIVISION THE BLUFFS Pro-iect Description Rezoning of a 20.9-acre site from R-1 Residential to R-3 •Residential. Approximately 9.5 acres of the property is to be developed area. The remaining 11.4 acres is proposed to remain undisturbed open space. A portion of the total site acreage will involve vacation of unbuilt public right of way. The proposal consists of approximately 165 multifamily dwelling units contained in approximately eight buildings. The overall site density is 7.5 units/acres. Additionally, the proposal will include a recreational building and parking for an estimated 330 cars. The residential structures will be contained in four-story buildings with a maximum height of 45 feet above finished grade. Primary site access is proposed from Lake Washington Boulevard S.E. The proposal will be reviewed through the site plan approval process by the City to insure compliance with the design standards of the City. Legal D..escriptions . 1 . POR OF R/W 200 FT . IN WIDTH, DELINEATED ON -C.D. HOLLMANS LK WASHINGTON GARDEN OF EDEN DIV NO 5 AS C & P S P R R• LY BTW N LN OF TRACT 318 OF SD PLAT PROD WLY & N LN OF TRACT 350 OF SD PLAT TO W LN. OF SD HWY ' 2 . LOT 319 HILLMANS LK WN GARDEN OF EDEN #5 POR WLY OF ST HWY 2-A & POR OF PACIFIC COAST R/W ADJ ON W 3 . LOT 320 HILLMANS LK WN GARDEN OF EDEN #5 LY WLY OF ST HWY NO 2-A TGW POR OF PC R/W IN SW ' /4 .OF SEC 05-23-05 ADJ LY BTW N & S LNS SD TR 320 PROP WLY 4 . LOTS 321 -.322 HILLMANS LK WN GARDEN OF EDEN #5 POR WLY OF SEC ST HWY #2-A TGW POR OF P C R/W IN SW 1 /4 OF SEC 05-23-05 ADJ LY BTW N & S LNS SD TRACTS 321 & 322 . 5 . LOT 348,. HILLMANS LAKE WASHINGTON GARDEN OF EDEN,•,REN'TON WA 6. Lot 35]. n n n n n n 7. One-half adjacent road right-of-way wherever joining above properties LOTS 334 AND 335 HILLMANS LK WN GARDEN OF EDEN #5 LESS ST HWY POR OF PC R/W LY S OF S LN OF TR #333 HILLMANS LK WN GARDEN OF EDEN #5 PROD W & N OF . S LN OF TR 336 OF SD PLAT PROD W LESS ST HWY • Lots 345, 346, 349 and 350 Hillmans Lake Washington Garden of Eden, Renton, Washington POR PC R/W LY BTW N. LN Tract 317 PROD W of C. D. Hillman Lk Wn Garden of Eden #5 Less ' Co. Road and St Hwy and POR PC R/W shown in plat C. D. Hillman Lk Wn Garden of Eden, Div No 5. LY West of State Hwy 405 and LY S of easterly prolongation of the • most northerly line of Tract 350 of said plat to the west line of said highway. • LOTS 352 AND 353 HILLMANS LAKE WN GARDEN OF EDEN #5 LESS ST > • 334450-000.6-02. 334450-0005-03 1 • Puget Sound Power & Light Co. Ms. Sierra N. Jackson ! Tax Dept. 1322 Lake Washington Blvd. N. ` .j •. Puget Power Building Renton, WA 98056 I Bellevue,: WA 98009 J 334450-0007-01 r 334450-0045-05 Don . & Marge Schumsky Beatrice P. Lewis 2019 Jones Ave. NE 1401 Jones Ave .NE Renton, WA • 98056 Renton, WA 98055 f 334450-0050-07 334.450-0051-0.6 P. Kirkman & F. Kulle. - Marian Strutynski.' " Hazel, Ted & Tom 14 Newport Key 6901 3.7th Ave SW Bellevue WA . 98056 Seattle, WA 98126 j I 334450-0052-05. 334450-0075-08 Gary A. Land & Sally Long James B. & Helen F Carver 11404 137th Ave. SE 1507 Jones Ave:NE = ' Renton, WA 98055 Renton, WA 98056 334450-0076-07 - 334.450-0080-01, 0084-07 0093-06 Darlene S. Bassett ' 1513 Jones Ave NE ! Pauline H. Kirkman Renton, WA 98056 1002 N 35th Renton, WA 98056 334450-0081-00 334450-0082-09 ' . Mr. & Mrs.. James L. Marenakos Rollis Horton 1323 N 28th ' 1533 Jones Ave NE Renton, WA 98055 Renton, WA 98055 i i . 334450-0085-06 i. 334450-0086-05 Francisco T. Suarez ; A A. Ames 1617 Jones Ave NE 1609 Jones Ave NE Renton, WA 98055 • Renton, WA 98055 I I . I/> 334450-0090-09 ,,. 334450-0091-08 James W. Daniels Elmer C. Penney, Jr. 1707 Jones Ave NE - 1625 Jones Ave NE. Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98055 I.334450--0092-0.7 334450-0095-04 Harry T. Lambro ;� Darryl J. Smith ` 1633 Jones Ave NE . - 1733 Jones Ave NE Renton, WA 98.055 Renton, WA 98055 334450-0097-02. = - 334450-0100-0.7 - H. N. Shearer ' George W. Spencer . 1725 Jones Ave, NE 1809 Jones Ave NE Renton, WA 98055 . ` Renton, WA 98056 , 334.450-0101-06 334450-0115-00 Lucien W. Lemon s : Anthony J. Porcello 1801 Jones Ave 'NE' 1817 Jones Ave NE Renton, WA 98056 '. Renton, WA 98056 334450-0116-09 ' 334450-0120-03 J. J. Jorgensen . j Elmer Pistoresi 1901 Jones Ave NE j 1909 •Jones Ave NE Renton, WA 98055 - Renton,- `WA'. . 98055 334450-0121-02 334450-0125-08,- 0131-00 Howard H. Hawken ; ;Donald Schumsky 1917 Jones Ave NE . • : , . • .� ; 2019 ' Jones Ave NE Renton, WA, 98055 Renton, WA 98055 - 334450-0126-07 334450-0130-01- . George A. Fanning - Wyman Dobson , 2021 Jones Ave. NE' . . 821 N 1st .-ST Renton, WA 98055 Renton, WA 98055 • • 1 052305-9004-00 - .'0.52305-9010-02 ., • - Roger M.,_ Fleming • - . • ,r I - City of Renton' - 1404 N 24th' ST '200 Mill Ave S Renton, -WA 98056 - Renton, WA 98055 • . I� . 052305-9032-06 - - 052305-9037-0.1 : '`"•- 229650-0.054-03 - - ' Gary L. Davis- '. . • - State' Of Washington - 1 PO. BOX 829 ' - - • Dept. of Transportation ; Snoqualmie, .WA:- 9.8065 - .15325S.E. 30th Place f Bellevue,' WA :".98007-6538 • • •. . 1 ' 052305-9041-05 - I- 0523,05=90.62-09.r. _ • ' ., Richard Basquett'e : I Gary'•L. Davis - - 1512. N 24thr_ i' PO ,BOX 829' Renton, WA .. 98055 - ` - :. , - 'Snoqualmie;, WA 98065 • 05230.5-9063-0.8. - .: I 052305.-9064=.07 Walter•Grieser "- ` . r ,-- Gerrit & Til:ly.:Bonnema • - 2421 Garden CT I.N • ' ' • " 2 417 Garden" CT N - : Renton, WA 98056 = - Renton, WA' . 98056 . 052305-9065-06 -" 2296.50-0050-07 - • - • _R''.. L.:,;•Wagner; & A. M. Jorgensen'' ' '- George K ,Grant` `, x . 1321 :S :7th ST: ' ' 2425 Jones Ave NE - Renton, -WA . .98055 = ' . . .i -., . Renton, WA• 98056 - 22965'0.7005.1-0.6 I. . , i 229650-0055-02. 2433'. Jones: NE .,. - _ "1 24'17 Jones 'Ave NE - - • • Renton, WA ' 98055 {{t• 1 " Renton,: WA 98055 229650•-0057-00 _ ".I 229650-006500 - • M:'`'. H. Fakharzadeh : ' :. • Homer A. Van Ausdal '' ` "11226-Auburn Ave S, ' i ' 2422 Meadow Ave N • - ..Seattle, WA . `98.17.8 , .. : ': -Renton, WA 98055 : r- r 229650-0066-09 229650-0070.-03 Gerhard" K. Muller Fred' J. Walters 2502 Meadow Ave N 210Kingston Crossing CT Renton, WA 98055 ' Alpharetta, GA . 3020,1 J 229650-0129-04. 229650-0130-01 . Robert B. Radnich • George F. 'Collier '. 2501 Meadow Ave N 2419 Meadow Ave N Renton, WA 98056 Renton, 'WA 98055 229650-0131-00, 0133-0 229650-0132,-09; ,01�34-07 0136-05 • Ray Jon Aliment Jack R. Ring { 2421 Meadow Ave' N 2413 Meadow N Renton, WA 98055 Renton, WA 98055 229650-0138-03, .0140-09 Gary B. & Paula E. Dubois 2415 Park PL N' Renton, WA 98056 I , r-_ U • 1 4 ---- _ - 33445.0-0140-09 3.34450-0180-00, Alexander ..V: -& Mary Quincey _ Esther L. Holt • ;202.5 Jones .Ave:NE • 2124 High "Ave-NE _ Renton,.; :WA: 98056 Renton, WA 98055 • 334450-0181-09 - I 334450-0183-07`f •• . . William M. Sparrow R Knudson ' 2033 Jones -NE 2116 'Highs Ave NE Renton, WA' 98055 Renton, WA 98055' • 33445'0-0189-01 1 3'34450-0190-08 • Lynn A." Chavis _ - ! Kenneth Jackson Stewart, Jr. 2216 High Ave NE I- 2132 High Ave NE ' Renton, •'WA ::98056 i Renton, WA 98055 t 33445.0-0191-07 334450-0192-.06 : George C. Preston I Martin J. Ulrich 22.17 Jones Ave NE 2209` Jones Ave "„NE Renton, WA 98055 , Renton, WA `98056 334450-0210-04 334450-0211-03 `. R. N. Ratray. Moon S. - Ean 2301 Jones Ave NE 2300 High Ave‘NE Renton, WA 98055 Renton, WA 98055 334450-0212-02 334450-0213-01 Debora Kay :Holt a James R. ,&-_Margaret. L. Hanson 2124 High Ave NE I 1802 C' ST SE:,..#B Renton, WA 98056 Auburn, _ WA 98002 - 334450-0220-02 334450-0230-00 Duane W. & Patricia M. .Amick Don Maletta 1601 NE- :24th V ST 1509 •N 24th Renton, WA 98055. •:: Renton, WA 98055 V 334450-0234-06 - 334450-0235-05 Michael G. Mullinaux 1 Leonard ' F. •Holma 1415 N "24th 1409 N 24th 'ST Renton, WA 98056_ Renton, WA 98056 l � 334450-0236-04 ? 334450-0250-05, 0250-88 Helen E. Shook ' : L. C. Walt 1405 N 24th . - 1311 ' N 26th''ST Renton, WA 98056 • + Renton, WA 98056 334450-0290-07 334450-0315-08 Sam Abbey Lincoln Lakeside LTD PARTNS 22015 98th PL W C/O Lincoln Property CO' Edmonds, WA 98020 17.45 114th Ave SE Suite 100 Bellevue, WA 98004 334450-0340-07 334450-0345-02 Toru Matsuoka I j James S. Martindale 5150 S' Orcas ST ,.971.2 237th PL SW Seattle, WA 98118 i. Edmonds, WA 98020 334450-0365=07 334450-0375-05 Douglas M. °Buck Pauline Kirkman Et. AL 8805 S 121st 1002 N '35th - Seattle, WA 98178 I, Renton, WA - 98056 - f -334450-0390-06 ' 334450-0395-01 James Martindale - f Mosley & Hazel Kirkman Est of Robert Martindale' Estate Hazel 9712 237th P1 SW 1002 ' N 35th V_ ' Edmonds, WA 98020 , Renton, WA 98055 334450-0775-01, 9015-0- 052305-.9.003-01 ' 229650-0056-01 I • ; : Northern Pacific RY' CO - "- W. E. Bennett/Deputy Finance 1511 Sixth City of Renton Seattle, WA 98101 200 Mill Ave S Renton, WA 98.055,:. er ••• -.I" • . • • . ':., . .•fril • C:3 . - J. • ' ,t1 • . ,.. "v• , , .......... . •,- ' ------------7....,... - • - .-- __,... , ., ...- -._ --......------ , ' •- ,-'-.. . .., : ,"_____:,........;_:;t:- -•-• .:;__--::...":"---•::::::---:;_-_--.-..-.:.-7.-7.-_--•-••,•.•„,',.-• *r• • • . . • •-.- • i • • ..,__ ' • ., .'--I--- -----------,---4- • :--..---'-:•7.----.::-.-:-::"-:-• -••::7-.E:------•••'`'''-•:.."--.--I..-----,/-r:-..,7---.-_-_-_-_:::::-..r:FI'r..-2.-.--__...-:::: :-...."--7-_ .- -,, , .•//7/ .. . .. . • .."! , •....: ,.,: ., . - -----'------------11:.:-.,.7.:::: ••••-_::-----';-',7:7::.---..--:-.7::::----•••-7::-:•-------_7.--':.:.1-•••••••••-_"..-_-__-----=:- ..1 • • ,, .„-._._._.._ __-- -- ,-....-•-- , ='•:--.---.;.:.:-.77.-::H.E:::::_=-2',--11-]:,KB.,:r1.:5'Z';-----=:::::::::-...7---.„)---'---.."-'---.,••. - ----..-7-7•:---;7„."----='-:"-_-_----..--:--::_;.;•;-_-.:-.:------2,--7---•.-_-_--::•-•:------------7,--/ 1.i s. ' • • . . • • :;.:7--:--:•-•:------,-;•-----7-2r:,-77=-'-.±±.*:7-.-7.7-77-7-2--- -.-..:1.-_--.1-----4-,,,,'-:--7...-3„-:-------::-- •:---=------ .,.-- --.-- ,....-.:-.__------------------ •., „,,,,. -,. ',., ', ;if/,)\,...,,....,c-;-...c.---...,_-_:::........-,.._-....-.:.__•-•,-,-_----0 ...-.! .r r.,i '...‘,...,.,_, •• - -• ;.•,:•.,f-F: - • - __- __•-- , , , :, . , . :....... ..- • • - _ -" . .., , — ------,..--, ._.,..;-:.:-•:-.::.....--i•-ir--_,--•=•-F,--,----7:?-4;•--- --.::::-.7--z---_-:---_-"f:f.y.—...?"-,„•--,..::::,.---,._.. -----,:.: ,1: , , ... ... -- -- ..--,---:.,43::•.•• i/ • , • , : . •.., • , . . -_......---- ......._... , --_-_-:-.:72.5:3,--,/•-,\. -...-... •. . , , -_,..--"--z.,..,-.:::-•••__.....-:\,•„,, •••• \:.,,-. .- ..:,• :. .. . :;:e4 ...40-;:lie::§Wi:'§i0 4, • '''''.:'-' ' ..' --:,---•-----" .. -,'.-•/:////:;/----:::-:.-- /„/ ..1.,/,'--\le"--- --..-:.----„-----'-.----''''''..;:: ",;.r1.::::-.7_7';,'`siP:',\\.s2<''.."\'-%,,'77-1;r• i'•••••---.77-:::::-.:,:' ••' -`2- '-'--;•---.,,.... ---. if•!'. ;,,.• •• ' -- . , •••,. ' - '-;;-----` / . ,../. -'/. -------.---•/ .."...--1',/,.:7,---,::-.--‘-:=7"---:.2.-..-------:•-------7•17.7.---T.:"....---•j!„,--,,,,,:;,-,:.:,•;,',,\\„, .,,,'\ .1„..,....",,,,,,,,,.•.:: i - r„ -........-------..._•„::_.:.-...•--...,z: ••. • . . :.,.- • ...„ . • • .......... . ...... , .. •— •::. --..-:-..,-:.,-.:,----. .-.:-7.:::-.,7_,. _, • ---%- • -" --1 I •• • , •;• .• -......;...--....•....- . ..,._... .:;I --,, ...,.\•\., - •• . ,---....///..-...". ..-...,---- 1......-----------.7.:::.:7—,--- V"!' ii.-_--‘,..---7.\:-..:,--•--- 1 ' r 4 --- - .j/ .....--- ‘... ... • . . -. •--.... •. ..... ... ..,.,... ...... .•••• ..... .. . ....... . - . / i 1 ' •' 1 11 .; "- • •• • . 1 . . --•-- ...-... . • '5...... ..------... ... .... C`.> <--....- '• '•• :-.:: :K,A11 c-) .;:sir'..-. "-- . - .. '.- ---) '!.:. I, ' .;,;`,-. ..,. :::7!!::'::::::-.7,5_:::--7-:.--..-f,;;;Y..1. .E.'..C. ...-B'LD:\--a..."- -. ::::-.., .%11: :- ; / . ... . .. ..,........ ..... , . . .. , . \., :,-...i • _ •.'„,•:.,,,i,.•/,••,.' ..-:::.;:?:•-•.:..j.\2:...\,_- i I R7././r,././."...IV----k--.- .......---- ..":,..;•-ii;-:,;....:: :'-':-----•---F•_,:::,...-- .2\r i 1) %.\--\:',..,\-----7-... --------•-•••-• :-:....::::- :::..C"--- ---•-•-.-••••,.....:,•,..-....--•-:::---...'-,::::*:-',.. . '•.\-:,.. , ••••••r .--'--;7;---•:•'•'-''••'•/'''' r'"'. '',./,•-•-.,--''',..'\'''''' .' 12-;•-••-7///! \-..-,•-:-.'::.---;.'.•,-5;.;'.:•'.7-. ',.,..-•----"--',"-•\'-i.:..-4-tINDISTURRED----).------------:.-::::z.___ ------..Y.',',-.'-• ".--- ----..-- .,..'". •.-...-- ..- ., ' - • • . \•••.,-,-, i :y..l I ..... i‘---_ --::•"---_,...--.....:=:.:77.:..;f;-,--- " .. • • ' .,-' ••- ..---- -:! ^ N...e E l E. ..,\,. ' E. 1 : ; ,I:E•• E E-- . \'' . '''t...,l',:--, 1 , , • . ... . , . .• \--.."•:--'41bri '•-: -.' ,// '---,--- .---.- .......-- ••• _..- °a--.:.14:•-..-:-'-,---- - , -.. - . '-- - '..• - .-- : ' • ''','•"" `•-•• ---:•.•-)i'A 'EDGE OF DEVELOPED AREA. . . • . _. .... . . .. ‘,...... 50.14.. 1...._.1.4_„"...-....;i_• - ..:.tj N ... /7- ..,. .........•.--• • .. ... . -'---:::',-,--,i------) --- .-'...,:-..A. 5G1°., ------ -' -coN 0 ,,-- :-. NII4G Rmt, OA VI , -----,-.:,,,----__. ---- .._•-_:,,,, :: ,--w i:It'l /- .• , --" ., --...:.-..-,..-i,,i. :::------ i.( •/ \_ - -..... . .__ --- .--- •_-, )/ AF1K , . 1,-LA-P•le-e' '' GO P . • .•\--..z.,-,i,-..:::::---.,----- .,-, 1,,k,_",:------- : .- . -------"- 50E-1-1146 moR1P1/41-6eP' . . ...„.„. . ... : ., • ,.• - GooL° ..... .. .,...„. .., 4,• . .,,,e• '''''' ''•' , ••[..•••,,,j , , ,,,,,,,,•''''''' :,,.. 1,...,4, '"'",... 9,''''' • ...... ....0-- . ' c,.......-.2„.„,k . .• . S •••', \ if. ' IF ,••°''''''' ''''' ''''m''''' '• ,. ' ,\ , ,, . s,..,,----,. , ."-- ,,,. , .„...„ e I .,,, ‘ \,\. // ./ , G-c0V4 , ' 4 p '4 rg':' .4., 4' ..g' t g ,r4 / 4" A SICkt - ' 1 ''' Nil . g S 1iir • '' ''', 4'':, i -,..,:.--C'4404...4.4,44,4*'''.4,"444.4.,,,,,„ . ',-",, .': t . ..,,,,,,,,:... .,,,,,,,,..° ..,......- "....... , :. . , .... , IN . . 1 . Scale: 1" = 200' . c• Figure 3 • . I:7 lailINIFIllr ell; . , .. -1...•• - . • Proposed Action , . . 165-Unit Planned Unit Development - •- . 1 • . . ,. . • . INTERSTATE 405 • , E Yahipi ' oN 46:„.. . . , _ , i , -:_-_ _- , _ , -4 )J - t / wa+r, -7 - s°,Z yip . r'ii11 111. f ! ° f bp.,,,.. 7RU~ • `.; ' , 'Ib:4it I g; iii'' .: -: )\`'-\\N1 1v/ rf I I ►t:% uHDiS r:s Alk- ` %%uil:il�_�..� ;' �. {� �iia o/r//`//%�a ; �� ��j`* „ `- i16 1 ('� • :1 " �'1. •� _ •n % "iiik �,•`-<►,' ♦jam � ), . 0 ) ------- - ' ----\....\\, , ,\`\.; ...__; 411111:1114_40.4e,. ',:::01106Aci- - 62.: 1,, ,.k_ A... i link , i .#04.4.ti,,,irip.. _ j , 4/8 i 0 1 11144 ,' , (,,, , s .11,,,vh. _ _ , .,, �i ;:ai , _ ___ _ y ,, i ,' \ , 1 StoG7 1 v --L- 1 ` to ' 1�A r= 5l1T1PtGTC�-N� SLOPE BREAKDOWN `` Slope Symbol Slope Range �; . C�7JE' CDULON INEMpgIfiL 1-:::: : 1 - 25% -; �=?F. 25 - 40% -.1::". // 40% + , �� i aKe wns +wort `t TOTALS LEGEND Proposed Pedestrian Trail \ '''- Future Pedestrian Trail I N Scale: 1" = 200' (approximately) Q5— 40 70 pia ,qp`2ot 1 rim Figure 3 Proposed Action 165-Unit Planned Unit Development • ••,;,-:.i: j CITY OF RENTON • Planning/Building/Public Works Department • Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator • • December 16, 1998 • Mr. Scott B. Springer O • Senior Vice President • Legacy Partners • 1756- 114th Avenue SE, Suite 135 Bellevue,WA 98004-6931 SUBJECT: THE BLUFFS AT LAKE WASHINGTON-MINOR SITE PLAN , • MODIFICATION, SA-044-89 - Dear Mr. Springer, • I have reviewed your request for a minor•modification of the site plan approval of The Bluffs at Lake Washington, SA-044-89. The proposed minor modification include: , 1. A reconfiguration of the areas of disturbance to the benefit of the adjacent single family development. Grading is no longer proposed in the northern portion of the site resulting in a five acre undisturbed greenbelt adjacent to the existing single family development. This will result in less site disturbance, as compared with the existing approval. This change is a result • • of the revised primary and emergency access approved by the City of Renton Fire Prevention Bureau on July 29,;1997. The revised access to the upper terrace includes a cul-de-sac turnaround, a 26-foot wide two-way drive and a 20-foot wide emergency access and pedestrian corridor. 2. A redesign of the access in the lower terrace to respond to current fire and life safety requirements. This change improves access in the lower terrace and refines the grading to provide for the development of one additional residential building. This new building area will increase the number of proposed units from 165 to"180 units. I agree that the change in the emergency access road,thereby leaving five acres of undisturbed greenbelt adjacent to the single family neighborhood, is a positive change and is considered a minor modification. The final plans for the revised access road is subject to Fire Department approval • for details of turning radius,grades, distances, etc. The revision of the access to the lower section,per Fire Department request, is also considered to be a minor modification. The addition of another building containing 15 more units represents a • 9.1%change, falling within the 10%maximum,for a minor modification, and is thus approved as a minor modification to your existing site plan SA-044-89. SA-044-89 is due to expire on March 9, 1999. An extension must be granted or a building permit application must be received prior to that date in order to for your site plan approval to remain active. I will send this site plan modification approval to the City Council for their consideration, along with your request for a change in your development agreement. 200 Mill Avenue South -Renton, Washington 98055 • Page 2. December 16,1998 , , . : The change in the development agreement has been referred to the Planning&Development Committee of the City Council.'You will be notified of the meeting date to consider your request. C ames C.Hanson,Director Development Services cc: Jana Huerter Peter Rosen , • -.JCHckg98-062 • • • • • • 1 �, ... . CHI OF RENTON . _ ;. .tw • . City Clerk Jesse Tanner,Mayor • Marilyn J.Petersen • • December 9, 1998 Scott B. Springer Senior Vice'President Legacy Partners 1756 114th Avenue SE, Suite 135 Bellevue,WA 98004-6931 , Re: The Bluffs at Lake Washington; File No. R; SA-89-044 Dear Mr: Springer: By letter dated November 25, 1998, you requested that a revised Property Use and ; Development Agreement for the referenced development be accepted and processed with your November 24, 1998, extension request. The letter was placed on the Renton City Council agenda on December 7, 1998, and referred to the Council's Planning and Development Committee for review and recommendation. , You will be contacted by the Council secretary when this matter is scheduled on the . . . Committee agenda. If I can provide additional information or assistance,please feel free to call. _ Sincerely, c.• - • • Marilyn . ersen City Clerk - cc: Mayor Jesse Tanner . • Council President Bob Edwards • , Jana Huerter,Development Services Division - 1055 South Grady Way - Renton, Washington 98055 - (425)430-6510/FAX(425)430-6516 ®This paper contains 50%recycled material,20%post consumer December 7, 1998 Renton City Council Minutes Page 401 period,and release of retained amount of$6,706.17 to Snelson Co.,Inc., contractor,if all required releases are obtained. Council concur. CAG: 98-028, Cedar River Water Utility Division submitted CAG-98-028, Cedar River Utility Crossing, Utility Xing, Schedule E,Terra Schedule E, and requested approval of the project,authorization for final pay Dynamics estimate in the amount of$1,928.69, commencement of 60-day lien period,and release of retained amount of$6,627.77 to Terra Dynamics,Inc.,contractor,if all required releases are obtained. Council concur. Public Works: Water Main Water Utility Division submitted request from Woodman Construction,Inc. for Oversizing Reimbursement, reimbursement in the amount of$3,799.30 for water main oversizing along Woodman Construction Duvall Ave.NE near NE 4th St.,provided to comply with the City's (Duvall/NE 4th) Comprehensive Water System Plan. Council concur. MOVED BY EDWARDS, SECONDED BY CORMAN, COUNCIL APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA AS AMENDED TO REMOVE ITEM 7.b.FOR SEPARATE CONSIDERATION. CARRIED. Separate Consideration Mayor Tanner recommended that Terry Lee Jurado be appointed as Municipal Item 7.b. Court Judge to fill the unexpired term of Corinna,D.Harn;term to expire Municipal Court:Appointment 12/31/2001. The Mayor further recommended that Mr.Jurado begin his term of Judge Jurado January 4, 1999, at the"C"step of the salary range. Council President Edwards expressed assurance that Judge Jurado will serve the City well in this role. MOVED BY EDWARDS, SECONDED BY PARKER, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE MAYOR'S APPOINTMENT OF TERRY LEE E JIJRADO TO MUNICIPAL COURT JUDGE. CARRIED. CORRESPONDENCE Correspondence was read from Scott B. Springer, Legacy Partners, 1756- Citizen Comment: Springer- 114th Ave. SE#135,Bellevue, 98004,transmitting a revised Property Use and The Bluffs @ Lake WA, Development Agreement for The Bluffs at Lake Washington,and requesting Property Use&Development that it be processed along with their 11/24/98 extension request. MOVED BY Agreement EDWARDS, SECONDED BY CLAWSON,,COUNCIL REFER THIS 5pc, tert-6L\ MATTER TO THE PLANNING&DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE. CARRIED. Citizen Comment: Blayden- Correspondence was read from Bob Blayden,Blayden Design/Build,PO Box Hearing Examiner Appeal 3029,Renton, 98056, suggesting that rather than referring appeals of Hearing Process Examiner decisions to Superior Court,such appeals instead be referred to the Committee of the Whole. MOVED BY EDWARDS, SECONDED BY CORMAN,,COUNCIL REFER THIS MATTER TO THE COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE. CARRIED. City Attorney Lawrence J.Warren commented that land use appeals to Superior Court are now resolved within four to five months,and no longer take two years as asserted by Mr.Blayden. Citizen Comment: McKnight Petition was read submitted by Mallorie Taylor,Nicole McClure,Allison Students Petition- Logging Moore and Amy Withers, containing 454 signatures of McKnight Middle Concerns •School students who are concerned about logging in Newcastle and Renton. MOVED BY EDWARDS, SECONDED BY CORMAN, COUNCIL REFER THIS MATTER TO THE COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE. CARRIED. Citizen Comment: Roush- Correspondence was read from Jeffrey A.Roush, 1109 First Ave.#500, Seattle, Austin Site Rezone 98101,requesting that the City cancel the pending Austin Site rezone(3.2 acres (Cancellation Request),R-97- located at 800 SW 16th Street,File No.R-97-161).MOVED BY EDWARDS, 161 SECONDED BY CORMAN,COUNCIL REFER THIS MATTER TO THE ADMINISTRATION. CARRIED. • • AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION • Lori L. Furnish first duly sworn on oath states that he/she is the Legal Clerk of the • SOUTH COUNTY JOURNAL 600 S. Washington Avenue, Kent, Washington 98032 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON HEARING EXAMINER RENTON,WASHINGTON a daily newspaper published seven (7) times a week. Said newspaper is a legal A Public Hearing will be held by the newspaper of general publication and is now and has been for more than six months Renton Hearing Examiner at his regular prior to the date ofpublication, referred to, printed andpublished in the English language meeting in the Council Chambers on the 9seventh floor of City Hall, Renton, continually as a daily newspaper in Kent, King County, Washington. The South County Washington, on December 8, 1998 at Journal has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the 10:00 AM to consider the following THE State of Washington for King County. BLUFFS The notice in the exact form attached, was published in the South County LUA-98-162,SA(89-044) ProJournal not in supplemental form) which was regularly distributed to the subscribers and tormodify residentiala approved site plan (andPP 9 Y and construct 174 units in 26 during the below stated period. The annexed notice, a buildings. Location: Lake Washington Blvd. North, between NE 4th and NE 22nd Streets. The Bluffs Legal descriptions of the files noted above are on file in the Development on: 11/27/98 Services Division,Sixth Floor, Renton City as publishedHall. All interested persons are invited to be present at the Public Hearing to express The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publicatio, is the sum of $36.06 their opinions. Legal Number 5471 ,__ Publication Date:November 27,1998 Published in the South County Journal November 27,1998.5471 n � � Legal ler S uth ounty Journal - Subscribed and sworn before me on this day of - , 0111i r `` Q;=c? �n Notary Public of the State of Washington • E'aTARY : = residing in Renton -0- • = King County, Washington /it,/°Ill I S ,"%%°` . . . .. ... ... ...... . .... . . TY• CI OF:RENTQN CURRENT PLANNING DIVISION AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING On the t s-r day of Dec cvn e..lr- , 1998, I deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope containing Rem., 4o tte .rtv� Ek�V. Y‘Iht.Y"' documents. This information was sent to: Name Representing Sc Sntno(.pr Lem Par�'v‘eHs Res wdev ktat ‘(vtc Pe� aWneYs sec mod) P (Signature of Sender) Srardr+.. k• Scc. � STATE OF WASHINGTON ) SS COUNTY OF KING I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that 9y__ oo signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for th& uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated: �f Notary Public in and for the State of W�1tfington Notary (Print) MARILYN KAMCHEFF My appointmenteewiN s.N EXPIREC C 23/99 Project Name: u, ffs Project Number: LUR .Bel-0 ,Sp_H "B" NOTARY.DOC Gl e/egE5'�V/DeN mu=7 CITY OF RENTON - /0- 7_ ; o I I I DEC 0 2 1998 DEVEOP I YOFNT RENTONNI if ep6_4 TvNG III il RECEIVED D E C U 1 1998 11111 CITY CLERK'S OFFICE �L' RECEIVED LEGACY PARTN ERs November 25, 1998, • Legacy Partners 1756-114th Avenue SE,Suite 135 Bellevue,WA.98004-6931 Renton City Council Phone:425.455.4813 City of Renton • 1055 South Grady Way Renton,WA 98055 Re: The Bluffs at Lake Washington—File No. R;SA-044-89 • Dear Council Members: Legacy Partners recently submitted a site plan modification application to the City for modification of The Bluffs approved site plan. The public hearing for the application is scheduled for.December 8, 1998 before the Hearing Examiner. Anticipating that a decision will be made.in late December, we have enclosed a revised Property Use and Development Agreement for The Bluffs at Lake Washington. This revised agreement is necessary to implement changes that are proposed in the, modification application. We request that this revised agreement be processed with our November 24, 1998 extension request. We appreciate your attention to this matter. If you have any questions or require additional information please call Joe Strobele or me at 425-455-4813. Sincerely, l'q•et*.ZR Scott B. Springer Senior Vice President • Enclosure Cyril McNeely alien Shook en Vaupel 3810 Park Avenue North 1 North 24th St Box 755 Renton,WA 98056 Renton,WA 98056 Renton,WA 98057 Richard Wagner Joan Jensen Darryl Ingelmund 2411 Garden Court North 2721 Meadow Avenue North 3602 Lake Washington Blvd North Renton,WA 98056 Renton,WA 98056 Renton,WA 98056 Michael Hannis Cindy Smith Joanne Stewart Hannis and Olsen 1733 Jones Avenue NE 3233 Mtn. Avenue North 3900 East Valley Hwy, Suite 203 Renton,WA 98056 Renton,WA 98056 Renton,WA 98056 - David Sager George Spencer Jane Tobin 1025 North'28th Place 1809 Jones Avenue NE 7662 South 135th Renton,WA 98056 Renton,WA 98056 Seattle,WA 98178 Stuart Dooley Darryl Smith Bill Heath 2003 N.E. 16th 1733 Jones Avenue NE 308 Stevens Avenue SW " Renton,WA 98056 Renton,WA 98056 Renton,WA 98055 Jack Leach Chan Betts Mary Jo Graves 622 South 320th 1014 North 30th 905 North 28th Place Federal Way,WA 98003 Renton,WA 98056 Renton,WA 98056 Chalmar Bolen Graham Bell Shirly Milliren 2712-Meadow Avenue North 807-North 33rd 1020.North 28th Plae Renton,WA 98056 Renton,WA 98055 Renton,WA'98056 Edward Scheirer Ralph Evans Linda Babcock 3312 Lake Washington Blvd North 3306 NE 1lth Place 2801 Mountain View Avenue North Renton,WA 98056 Renton,WA 98056 Renton,WA 98056 Kim Browne Fritz Brendemihl James Martindale 1003 North 28th Place 2116 High Avenue NE 9712-237th Place SW Renton,WA 98056 Renton,WA 98056 Edmonds,WA 98020 Thomas Cooke Mosley and Hazel Kirkman Matsuoka Tom 12630-84th Avenue South Pauline Kirkman 5150 South Orcas St Seattle,WA 98178 1002 North 35th Seattle,WA 98118 Renton,WA 98056 Joyce Segur 1100 North 36th Street Renton,WA 98056 III® III III® November 24, 1998 PARTNERS LEGACY Legacy Partners 1756-114th Avenue SE,Suite 135 Bellevue,WA 98004-6931 Phone:425.455.4813 Renton City Council City of Renton 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 • Re: The Bluffs at Lake Washington—File No. R;SA-044-89 Dear Council Members: We are writing to request a two-year extension for the above referenced development. The Property Use and Development Agreement for The Bluffs was approved by the City Council on March 8, 1993 (see enclosed agreement). Later action by the Council required that a complete building permit application be submitted by March 8, 1999. The two-year extension to March 8, 2001 is necessary to provide sufficient time for processing the amended site plan application submitted on October 26, 1998 and completing the necessary construction documents for a complete building.permit application. We appreciate your attention to this request and Legacy Partners looks forward to proceeding'with development of this residential community in the City of Renton. If you have any questions or require additional information please call Joe Strobele or meat 425-455-4813. Sincerely, Scott B. Springer Senior Vice President Enclosure 411FY OF RENTON f - + BOARD OF PUBLIC WORKS ' • Jesse Tanner,Mayor November 18, 1998 Bruce.Dodds .` " c%DODDS ENGINEERS 4205.7 148th Ave.NE,#200 ' Bellevue WA 98007 • • SUBJECT: THE BLUFFS AT LAKE WASHINGTON 'VARIANCE REQUEST TODRIVEWAY SLOPE • • 1600=1900.LAKE:IWASHINGTON BLVD.N. `;. .. . • �' { ``� ...`_ 7. • Dear Mr.Dodds ';tip . ; vs•, ' As you know,the Board of-Public Works voted'this morning:to.grant a variance for the driveway slope grades at your•proposed'development,lubject to the followingcondition: 1);The slopes be • . . - as shown on.the plans dated November 199;8.,and"::that':the emergency vehicle road design shall • include Fire Department Standards to'aceommodate fire'vehicles.,; If you have any questions or concerns; please contact Paul Lumbert, Board Coordinator,"at (425)430-7304: g k . . , • ncerely, iH• Mickie Flanagan, Recording Secretary cc: Paul Lumbert,City of Renton. Anna Nelson,Stalzer&Assoc. Joseph Strobele,Legacy Partners Residential Inc. LUAFie . 1055 South Grady Way-Renton,Washington 98055 (425)235-2569 H:\DIVISION.S\BPW\CORRESPO\98-004.DOC Facsimile (425)235-2541 Board of Public Works sq SA November 18, 1998 Page 2 • VARIANCE,The Bluffs at Lake Washington, 1600 - 1900 Lake Washington Blvd.N - the applicant requests a variance for driveway slope. Action: Moved by Christensen,seconded by Duffy,to grant a variance for the driveway slope grades at The Bluffs at Lake Washington development, subject to the following condition: 1) That the slopes be as shown on the plans dated November 1998, and that the emergency vehicle road design shall include Fire Department Standards to accommodate fire vehicles. MOTION CARRIED. 4. REFERRALS FROM CITY COUNCIL: None 5. COMMENTS AND ANNOUNCEMENTS: None 6. CONSENT AGENDA: None 7. ADJOURNMENT: Chairman Hanson adjourned the meeting at 9:00 a.m. City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public v✓..rks ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: radtLe. COMMENTS DUE: 11/16/98 APPLICATION NO: LUA89-044,SA-H DATE CIRCULATED: 11/5/98 APPLICANT: Legacy Partners PROJECT MANAGER: Peter Rosen PROJECT TITLE: The Bluffs WORK ORDER NO: 78453 LOCATION: Lake Washington Blvd North, btwn NE 4th and NE 22nd Street SITE AREA: 22.3 acres BUILDING AREA(gross): 263,357 s.f. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Proposal to modify an approved site plan and construct 174 residential units in 26 buildings (35 foot height), a recreation center, and parking for 305 vehicles. Approximately 9.7 acres (44 % of the site) will be retained in natural open space. The primary entrance drive consists of a 26 foot wide driveway off Lake Washington Blvd. There is another driveway off North 20th Street accessing the northwest area of the proposed development. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet (6,70,,,,7 aid6 PM ) B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to property assess this proposal. (1 l) JF 9 k- Signature of Director or A h rized Representative Date DEVAPP.DOC Rev.10/93 41. PROJECT LUA-89-044,SA-H The Bluffs City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL &DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET (Continuation) POLICE RELATED COMMENTS 160.08 Police Calls for Service Estimated Annually CONSTRUCTION PHASE Theft from construction sites is one of the most common reported crimes in the city. To protect materials and equipment it is recommended that all materials and tools be locked up when not in use. The site will need security lighting and any construction trailer should be completely fenced in with portable chain-link fencing. The fence will provide both a physical and psychological barrier to any prospective thief and will`demonstrate that this area is private property. Construction trailers should be kept locked when not in use, and should also have a heavy-duty deadbolt installed with no less then a 1-1/2" throw when bolted. Glass windows in the trailer should be shatter-resistant. I also recommend the business post the appropriate"No Trespassing" signs on the property while it's under construction(flier attached). This will aid police in making arrests on the property after hours if suspects are observed vandalizing or stealing building materials. COMPLETED BUILDING Each unit should have solid core doors, preferably metal or metal over solid wood with peepholes and heavy-duty dead bolt locks. The bolts need to be at least 1-1/2" in length when extended and installed with 3"wood screws. Lower unit sliding windows, including glass patio doors, will need additional locks;these locks will need to secure the panes from being pried out of the frames vertically. This means the locks will need to be placed into the top or bottom.of the frames, in addition to any lock that limits horizontal movement. Alarm systems are recommended for each unit. There should not be any solid walls in any stairway or decking that would serve to limit the visibility and provide a place for a criminal to hide while waiting for a resident to return home. Extra security lighting needs to be installed in the parking lots, carports, along the sidewalks and trails, in the stairways, and between the buildings. Measures should also be taken to provide additional lighting for the common trash-dumping site. Each residence Page 1 of 2 • • PROJECT LUA-89-044,SA-H The Bluffs City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL&DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET (Continuation) should have their individual addresses listed clearly, on the outside of the buildings as well, with the numbers at least 6" in height of a color that contrasts with the color of the building and placed under a light. This will aid police or medics who respond to a call in finding the unit they need to go to. • Additional lighting should also be provided in the mail kiosk, as well as a trash can to dissuade littering. Landscaping in and around the exterior of the property should not be too dense or high. It is important to allow visibility. Too much landscaping will give the property the look of a fortress and make the residents feel isolated, and could also possibly give a burglary sufficient coverage to break into a unit. Page 2 of 2 41110 Tres ass USDIES Enforcement WATCH • Quite often, business owners and managers are faced with crimes that occur on the property after the businesses are closed and the employees have gone home. Some of the crimes that occur are burglary, vandalism, graffiti, trespassing, drug dealing and robbery in the parking lots. There is a way for police and business owners to discourage these types of crimes from taking place on private property, and that is by enforcing the City of Renton's Municipal Trespass Code 6-18-10. In order for police to be able to make an arrest for Trespass, business owners or managers need to purchase signs and display them in conspicuous areas on the property. These signs need to include the following language: 1. Indicate that the subject property is privately owned and; 2. Uninvited presence on the specified property is not permitted during the hours the business is closed, and; 3. Violators will be subject to criminal sanctions pursuant to Renton City Code 6-18-10. MOST IMPORTANTLY-THE SIGNS SHOULD BE CONSPICUOUS FROM ALL POSSIBLE POINTS OF ENTRY TO THE PROPERTY, AND ALSO BE PLACED ON THE EXTERIOR OF THE BUILDINGS. This way when a suspect is arrested, he/she will not be able to claim as a defense that he/she did not know he or she was trespassing. EXAMPLES FOR TRESPASS SIGNS: NO TRESPASSING NO TRESPASSING This is private property. Persons without specific No Trespassing after business hours business are not authorized to be on the premises between (insert specific times). Anyone on the the hours of(insert the hours your business is closed). premises after business hours is subject to Violators are subject to arrest and/or citation for criminal arrest and/or citation for Criminal Trespass pursuant to Renton City Code#6-18-10.. Trespass and/or impoundment of vehicle. Per Renton City Code #6-18-10. By enforcing the Trespass Ordinance, business owners and police will be sending a message to criminals that they are not allowed to conduct criminal activity on the property. In making arrests for Trespass, police may be preventing the more serious crimes from taking place. `', COURTESY OF RENTON POLICE DEPARTMENT • 1 CRIME PREVENTION UNIT 4'`'i� 235 - 2571 I • • Return Address: • City Clerk's Office City of Renton 1055 S. Grady Way Renton WA 98055 • Please print or type information Document Title(s): • Property Use and Development Agreement 4144 Reference Number(s)of Documents assigned or released: [on page of document(s)] Amends Agreement recorded under 9304130971 CGrantor(s)(Last name first,then first name and initials): C 1. City of Renton Cr) 2. 3. 4. 0 Additional names on page of document Grantee(s)(Last name first,then first name and initials): 1. Thomas A. Cooke 2. Glennis M. Cooke 3. Pauline H. Kirkman 4. la Additional names on page 4 of document M1 - Legal Description(abbreviated: i.e.lot,block,plat or section,township,range): Tracts 317 through 323, 334 through 336, 344 through 346, and 348 through ' ;. 353, CD Hillmans Lake Washington Garden of Eden, Div. No. 5 according 1:1 to the plat thereof as recorded in Vol. 11 of Plats, page 83, records • of KC, WA r . ® Additional legal is on page 14 of document I . Assessor's Property Tax Parcel/Account Number: numerous . 0 Additional legal is on page of document • . The Auditor/Recorder will rely on the information provided on the form. The staff will not read the document to verify the accuracy or completeness of the indexing information provided herein. PROPERTY USE AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT THIS INSTRUMENT is executed this date in favor of the City of Renton, a municipal corporation(the"City"), by the undersigned property owners (the"Owners") of the within described property. WITNES SETH: WHEREAS,the Owners are the owners of the property legally described on Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference(the"Property"); e-i and WHEREAS, the Owners obtained approval in 1993 for a rezone of the Property and Site Plan Approval for the development, subject to a Property Use and Development Agreement recorded at auditor's file no. 9304130971, records of King County, Washington(the"Development Agreement"). WHEREAS, the Owners' representative has filed a request under File No.R;SA 044 89 to modify the Site Plan Approval and amend the Development Agreement for the Property; and WHEREAS,the Development Services Division has granted approval of the minor site plan modification and recommended approval of the amendment of the Development Agreement; and WHEREAS, the City Council hasfound that the proposed minor site plan modification and amendment to the Development Agreement complies with the goals 1 t ' and policies of the Comprehensive Plan, is in the public interest, and will not impair the public health, safety and welfare; NOW, THEREFORE,the Owners hereby covenant, bargain and agree on behalf of themselves and their successors and assigns that they will comply with the following conditions if the minor site plan modification and amendment to the Development Agreement for the Property is approved. Section 1. Development of the Property shall be accomplished in accordance with the following conditions: A. Development of the Property shall be in accordance with the site plan approved by the Hearing Examiner's Decision and Recommendation dated January 12, 1993 ("Hearing Examiner's Decision"), as modified by the minor site plan ri modification approved by the Development Services Division dated December 16, 1998 (the"Minor Modification"). Minor modifications to the site plan that are not major. C adjustments may be permitted subject to the approval of the Development Services Division. B. The Owners shall execute covenants running with the land that establish the maximum overall project density of no more than 8.1.dwelling units per acre(maximum 180 units); and that establish the overall project height at 50 feet as shown in the approved site plan and exhibits to the Hearing Examiner's Decision. C. The Owners shall comply with all mitigation measures established by the Environmental Review Committee Mitigation Document published 2 on October 9, 1992. In addition, for the additional 15 units incorporated in the project pursuant to the Minor Modification, the Owners agree to pay mitigation fees in the following amounts: FEE RATE TOTAL Fire $388.00 per unit $ 5,820.00 Traffic $ 75.00 per trip $ 7,278.75 Parks $354.51_per unit $ 5,317.65 TOTAL $18,416.40 C T'! D. The Owners shall comply with the site plan approval conditions tii imposed by the Hearing Examiner in his January 12, 1993, and February 5, 1993 C Decisions, as amended by the conditions set forth in the minor site plan modification ) approval from the Development Services Division dated December 16, 1998.PP P Section 2. This Agreement may be amended or modified by agreement between the Owners and the City; provided, such amended agreement shall be approved by the legislative authority of the City by ordinance. Section 3. It is further expressly agreed that in the event any covenant or condition or restriction contained herein or any portion thereof is invalid or void, such invalidity or voidness shall in no way affect any other covenant, condition or restriction contained herein. Section 4. This Agreement and the approved site plan shall be valid through March 10, 2000. In the event the Owners fail to submit a building permit application 3 • • • • for any phase of the project within said time period,the zoning of the Property shall . revert to the zoning classifications that most closely.reflects the land use designations for the Property as depicted on the City's then current Land Use map for the Comprehensive Plan. Section 5. This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each one of which shall be deemed an original. DATED this a5-11'1 day of Ilan/di, , 1999. OWNERS: tri S Thomas H. Cooke 717 eott-/2- Glennis M. Cooke Pauline H. Kirkman Marga et azel ` fr.771.01.1iy%l�iL�X Frances W. Mosley Kulle 4 Q�VCFM Nancy J. Lo Joyce L. Segur 4,11A di 44 J mes S. Martindale Kt' 0 Debra H4rold MarilynR.-Leask 2/Vu•z/ f( r,,etY11t-) Tom Matsuoka Shim Matsuoka CITY: 5 C OF RENTON,WASHINGTON By: Jesse Tanner Its: MAYOR • APPROVED AS TO FORM: OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY CD Larry Warren City Attorney 01.1 . . • J STATE OF 1 hM-SIB t u �L�- ) ) ss. COUNTY OF_ ) ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Thomas H. Cooke is the person who appeared before me, and said person acknowledged that said person signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be said person's free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated this I/Nay of n1 ' I'- , 1999. • af20.,.• � CD ALAN B.�LTS. M,��'� /41.ln f2 U6'1a nek P'I E fPSIY is {,r (print or type name) '"''s' ' NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of Washington, residing at kr-'t'1,. it" My Commission expires: LI-M-oZ C [Seal or Stamp] STATE OF tt/i A 144Yam) ) ss. COUNTY OF kepi,/Gi ) I / I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Glennis M. Cooke is the person who appeared before me, and said person acknowledged that said person signed . this instrument arid acknowledged it to be said person's free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. • 1 Dated this i/ day of / 4t''.�, 1999. COO"A-C4): ALAN BATSMAN NOTARY PUBLIC STATE rE J k.-..^',. ON (print or type name) COa;?'; > `: ' � NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of Washington, residing at Akkriln eJ My Commission expires: 14-1 R-0 Z [Seal or Stamp] 7 y ..- . . . . • STATE OF 1AI f I L cl c t ) ss. COUNTY OF IAA. GJ ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Pauline H. Kirkman is the , person who appeared before me, and said person acknowledged that said person signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be said person's free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated this 1/ 6-day of/y1/yt a,_ , 1999. afka,,,, CD ri A- i 'e,wka , e-! i ALAN BATEMAN 4.v. 9:1+ PUBLIC (print or type name) ri NOTARY NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of • . . t' .STATES►ti:.' !-` 'f'FO�' Washington, residing at A t HA y O COs tiwasi t-`a a.:: 1 APRIL i ,, 2002 My Commission expires: ! -14-oz v [Seal or Stamp] . STATE OF f,U / /-Gto) ) ss. COUNTY OF /ZtvL41 ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Margaret Hazel is the person who appeared before me, and said person acknowledged that said person signed this instrument.and acknowledged it to be said person's free and voluntary act for the . uses and purposes mentioned.in the instrument. . . Dated this I A day of f/2i li , 1999: . , PAIGUsik'CAZ ALAN BAT EM BAN NOTARY PUBLIC f�-(� - Tema STATE OF 1'.T }`` "='' "I (print or type name) CO ►t�� °''- > i NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of AP 'L.1 ,2002 Washington, residing at My Commission expires: 1-13-!.'Z [Seal or Stamp] 8 • I STATE OF tit $iLlr4l�,4v) ) ss. COUNTY OF /4,y4. ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Frances W. Mosley Kulle is the person who appeared before me, and said person acknowledged that said person signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be said person's free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated this /g day of Agielk, , 1999. 10Jaiv7 u ALAN BATEMAN IQN. -P4 NOTARY PUBLIC �..� (print or type name) STATE OF WAS;INGTON NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State f COMMISSION E 27s ; Washington, residing at/.M- l g APPIL19,2002 My Commission expires: 1444 [Seal or Stamp] STATE OF IA 44 ss. COUNTY OF ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Nancy J..Lotto is the person who appeared before me, and said person acknowledged that said person signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be said person's free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated this li —day of` ,2i , 1999. ALAN BATEMAN NOTARY PUBLIC A-la,„ i �-erYtanzN (print or type name) STATE OF INASi rise 'TON NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State f COMMISSION EXPIRES APPIL 19, 2002 Washington, residing at My Commission expires: N-I R-vim [Seal or Stamp] 9 / t STATE OF GU19-01-kug i--.L, ) , / ) ss. COUNTY OF k`V4.1 ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Joyce L. Segur is the person who appeared before me, and said person acknowledged that said person signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be said person's free and voluntary.act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. 1.4 Dated this // - day of j'j�?� , 1999. griResi • ALAN BATEMAN Idjte'_evtot.vi NOTARY PUP! r (print or type name) STATE �;.a ,, NOTARY PUBLIC in and•for. he State of C���'O, :, .a. . ! RAJ COMMISSION�;;,;I�;�� Washington, residingat APFi L 19,2007 My Commission expires: /4-11_0 [Seal or Stamp] STATE OF ) ) ss. COUNTY OF KGI4'Uf ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that James S. Martindale is the person who appeared before me, and said person acknowledged that said person signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be said person's free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. . Dated this 6 day of MIt�l# i- 1999. ►,^ 1 44)jrn44.0 . ALAN BATEMAN 41 --c NOTARY PUBLIC (print or type name) STATE OF IN.ASPi;:s; ;,, NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the�ySttate�of COMMISSION APRIL fig, 2009 Washington,residing at l x My Commission expires: 11-I 1-OZ [Seal or Stamp] 10 . # 0 . . . STATE OF l,{l#511.4 YLr.) ) ss. COUNTY OF_ 1.6/4._y ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Debra Harold is the person who appeared before me, and said person acknowledged that said person signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be said person's free.and voluntary act for the . uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated this 0 day of iIh -, 1999. ' , ()AAA. ALAN BATEMAN co NOTARY PUBLIC (o,„,k -r . e►Aa.e\ I STATE OF W'ASEdt! i O'! (print or type name) 71 ,; COMMISSION Ira HRES NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of :V APRIL� ' ` t;2 Washington, residing at a tt Z01...6 40 My Commission expires: 4t--141-04,;. [Seal or Stamp] v 1 STATE OF WieHh/`t ) ) ss. COUNTY OF /4//a/ ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Marilyn.K. Leask is the person who appeared before me, and said person acknowledged that said person signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be said person's free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated this 6 6-day of 4441. / , 1999. t.QaA,\- 6 .519lig ALAN BATEMAN m NOTARY PUBLIC (print or type name) STATE OF WASHaNO s O Li NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of COMMISSION EXPIRES APRIL 19, 2002 Washington, residing at A)3T-4i\ T0,4 My Commission expires: t1-I4,O? . [Seal or Stamp] 11 STATE OF JA44`tir, ) ) ss. COUNTY OF kis,`� ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Toni Matsuoka is the person who appeared before me, and said person acknowledged that said person signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be said person's free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated this )/ 4iday of Mifyeat,, 1999. ALAN BATSMAN � NOTARY PUBLIC klay. STATE OF W►ASHI G T O;N (print or type name) COMMISSION EXPIRES NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of CAPRIL 19,2002 Washington, residing at A -J My Commission expires: 6I-/ -Oz. [Seal or Stamp] STATE OF /0/41wii / ' ) ss. COUNTY OF /6444 ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Shizu Matsuoka is the person who appeared before me, and said person acknowledged that said person signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be said person's free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated this ID gay of ,7 014,, 1999. ALAN BATEIAN 71- , 7tpwkq,.-\ NOTARY PUBLIC (print or type name) STATE OF W►ASEUG J ON NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of COMMISSION EXPIRES Washington, residing at iJ APRIL 19,2002 My Commission expires: _ 14-1 R-�Z- [Seal or Stamp] 12 ,,i ( STATE OF ) ) ss. COUNTY OF ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that .Z61'T ai1//p- is the person who appeared before me, and said person acknowledged that said person signed this instrument, on oath stated that said person was authorized to execute the instrument and acknowledged it as the f edikaieivrof CITY OF RENTON, WASHNGTON, to be the free and voluntary act of such corporation for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated this o iday of 44 ft . h , 199 CD ri A so Kt I ��,, / © :'�* '� (print or type name) {� = •88 NOTARY 's T. NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the Slate of 7? = N 4 N.o PUBUc o: 2: Washington, residing at ,2P� •,„y),•;roeER a, . ••• My Commission expires: i 4 r •• 0-P wAsNk so [Seal or Sta t4 b a1n..• 13 `�a. I A ` DODDS ENGINEERS, INC. BELLEVUE WA.98007 DEI Project No: 97169 8/31/98 Exhibit A Consolidated Legal Description for The Bluffs Tracts 317 through 323, 334 through 336, 344 through 346, and 34'8through 353, C.D. Hilmans Lake Washington Garden of Eden, Division No. 5 according to the plat thereof as recorded in Volume 11 of Plats, page 83, records of King County, Washington; ril AND that portion of the Pacific Coast Railroad Company's Newcastle Branch right- of-'way being a strip of land 200 feet wide bounded on the north by the westerly production of the north line of said tract 334 and on the south by the westerly p • production of the south line of said tract 317; AND that portion of Third Avenue (AKA NE 20th Street and SE 104th Street) lying within said railroad right-of-way; EXCEPTING THEREFROM, any portion of the above described property lying easterly of the westerly margin of Primary State Highway No. 1 (SR 405) and westerly of the easterly margin of Lake Washington Blvd. North; TOGETHER WITH those portions of vacated Lake View Boulevard and SE 110th Street (Morgan Avenue) which attach thereto by operation of law. 97169, 3/30/99,page 1 03/09/98 MON 15:51 FAX 206 448 3444 P M W H & F LJ 002 PHILLIPS LAW or,-tCI3 DEVELOPMENT PLANNING Jc nvc.Mcxx,tuxTc„ 1VIcCULLOUCH MAItkNTP,..,CF'RA ER WILSON si:,,,, ,, clTy OF RENTON HILL 'O`j FIRST Avu`,N11 jI MAR FIKSO SI:AITI.I:.WASH,N,. IN 0 9 1998 APROFESSIONAL o'I I td` SERVICE CORPORATION (2o6)4,1H-TH1H RECEIVED rn x!(2c:6 1S-3.444 March 9, 1998 Via Facsimile (425-277-4455 Col/ Jim Hanson cpM� Director, Development Services O,�NT,o City of Renton /J N Nn, RF 200 Mill Avenue R �1 QT9 ,y TU'y /NO Renton, Washington 98055 � �i'' II by Re: The Bluffs PUD& Contract Rezone v4e) File No. R-89-044 Dear Mr. Hanson: We represent Lincoln Property Company ("Lincoln"),the developer of the Bluffs PUD, and are writing to request a two-year extension of the subject PUD_ The PHJD Agreement was approved by the City on March 8, 1993. Because the final date for the agreement fell on a Sunday, we are providing this request today, the next business day. The extension of the PUD is required because market rents in the past live years have not been able to support the cost associated with the development of this site- Rents have increased in the recent past,however, and Lincoln is anticipating being able to proceed with the project in the near future. We appreciate your attention to this request, and Lincoln looks forward to proceeding with this housing project in the City of Renton. Sincerely, ..6k• C. McCullough JCM:sch Enclosure cc: Lincoln Property Company DOCUMENT4 03/09/98 MON 16:20 FAX 206 448 3444 P M W H & F 002 PHILLIPS .I O N C.MCC uu.ouCH McCULLOUGH AL�uKa:'r Pi M. "fi��x r:e WILSON ; : HILL & Fiur A,-I.Nl I: FIKSOtill Al"I'I,[,WASHI NuroN A PROFESSIONAL 98 'I_2 ,K, 51:RV ICE CORI'OR ATION (2 O.1.1H_,ti,s FAX:c2n1,)•s4S-44.1 March 9, 1998 Via Facsimile (425-277-4455 D Jim Hanson MFjbT Director, Development Services �FRFN 4AN/NG City of Renton Mq 200 Mill Avenue R 9 1998 Renton, Washington 98055 VFD Re: The Bluffs PUD & Contract Rezone File No. R-89-044 Dear Mr. Hanson: We represent Lincoln Property Company ("Lincoln"), the developer of the Bluffs PUD. We previously wrote to request a two-year extension of the subject PUD. You have raised a question about the authority of Lincoln to seek an extension of the PUD Agreement. Lincoln executed an option agreement with the owners of the subject property in late 1997, and has made option payments to those owners pursuant to the terms of the agreement. The option agreement entitles Lincoln take all necessary action to proceed with final permitting and development of the property. We appreciate your attention to this request- Please let us know if you require any additional information concerning this request. Sincerely, Jo n C. McCullough JCM:sch Enclosure cc: Lincoln Property Company GiuNCOLMI/W SONO2.DOC -------1.11111117111111.1..ti°st,0 WPrs;"4',k. ram . City Clerk Earl Clymer, Mayor Marilyn J. Petersen May 19, 1993 Mr. Colin Quinn 16031 119th Place NE Bothell, WA 98011 4. Re: The Bluffs Rezone and Site Approval, File No. SA, R-89-044 Dear Mr. Quinn: Enclosed is a copy of the,contract agreement bearing King County's recording number (9304130971). Please feel free to call if I can provide additional assistance. Sincerely, Georgia Shives Office Assistant City Clerk's Office enclosure (1) 200 Mill Avenue South -Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2501 adopted in conjunction therewith, the prop- erty hereinbelow described has heretofore AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION been zoned as R-1 (Single-Family Residen- tial); and WHEREAS, a proper petition for change of zone classification of said property was Karen Tucker , being first duly sworn on oath originally filed with the Development Ser- states that he/she is the Legal Clerk of the vices Division on or about November 19, 1992,which petition was duly referred to the Hearing Examiner as a contract rezone for VALLEY DAILY NEWS investigation,study,and public hearing,and a public hearing having been held thereon 600 S. Washington Kent, WA. 98032 on or about December 15, 1992, and said matter having been duly considered by the a daily newspaper published six (6) times week. Said newspaper is a legal Hearing Examiner, and the Hearing Exam- newspaper of general circulation and is now and has been for more than six iner having recommended granting the rezone with conditions in the form of a months prior to the date of publication referred to, printed and published in the contract rezone, and said zoning request 'glish language continually as a daily newspaper in Kent, King County, Wash- being in conformity with the city's Compre- jton. The Valley Daily News has been approved as a legal newspaper by order hensive Plan, as amended, and the City of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for King County. • Council having duly considered all matters The notice in the exact form attached, waspublished in the ValleyDailyNews relevantrdthereto,and all partiesthaving beenri heard appearing in support thereof or in (and not in supplement form) which was regularly distributed to the subscribers opposition thereto; during the below stated period. The annexed notice, a NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUN- CIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASH- INGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Ordinance No . 4398 SECTION I. The following described property in the City of Renton is hereby rezoned to R-3, (Multi-Family Residence) subject to the findings, conclusions, and 4-3 0-9 3 decision of the Hearing Examiner dated was published on January 12, 1993,and subject further to the contract for rezone filed under King County The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of Auditor's File isN hereby93041 incorporatedncor, aa whicha said contract is and made a part hereof as if fully set forth, the $ 84 . 57 Development Services Director is hereby 11111 authorized and directed to change the maps �� of the Zoning Ordinance, as amended, to evidence said rezoning, to-wit: Legal Clerk, Valley Daily News (Legal description on file with City Clerk's office.) (Said property, approximately 22.6 acres, is located between Lake Wash- Subscribed and sworn before me this 3 0 t h day of April 19 93 ington Boulevard North and 1-405, east CITY OF RENTON. WASHINGTON of Gene Coulon Memorial Beach Park) ORDINANCE NO. 4398 SECTION II. This Ordinance shall be j / N ORDNANCE OF THE CITY OF REN- effective upon its passage, approval, and TON, WASHINGTON CHANGING THE five days after its publication. ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF CERTAIN PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this Notary Public or the State of Washington PROPERTIES WITHIN THE CITY OF REN- 26th day of April, 1993. TON FROM R-1, (SINGLE-FAMILY RESI- Marilyn J. Petersen, City Clerk residing at Auburn DENTIAL) TO R-3 (MULTI-FAMILY RESI- APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this 26th King County, Washington DENTIAL) (THE BLUFFS; FILE NO. day of April, 1993 R-044-89). Earl Clymer, Mayor WHEREAS, under Chapter 31 (Zoning Approved as to form: VDN p1164 Revised 7/92 Code) of Title IV (Building Regulations) of Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Ordinance No.4260 known as the"Code of Date of Publication: April 30, 1993 General Ordinances of the City of Renton," Published in the Valley Daily News April as amended, and the maps and reports 30, 1993. 8909 =- ' CITY.- F RENTON LL : j;:. City Clerk Earl Clymer, Mayor Marilyn J.Petersen April 30, 1993 Mr. Colin.Quinn 16031 119th Place NE Bothell, WA 98011 Re: The Bluffs Rezone and Site Approval, File No. SA, R-89-044 Dear Mr. Quinn: At the regular Council meeting of April 26, 1993, the Renton City Council adopted Ordinance No. 4398 approving the referenced rezone application. A recorded copy of the contract agreement will be forwarded to you upon receipt from King County. Please feel free to call if I can provide additional assistance. Sincerely, • Marilyn e,ersen, CMC City Cler cc: Don Erickson, Development Planning Division 200 Mill Avenue South -Renton, Washington 98055 -{206)235-2501 April 26, 1993 _ Renton City Council Minutes Page 189 The following ordinances were presented for second reading and adoption: Ordinance #4397 An ordinance was read changing the zoning classification of .95 acres of Rezone: Crystal Heights, property located at 801 and 821 Sunset Boulevard NE from R-1 (single- 821 Sunset Blvd NE, family residential) to R-3 (medium density multi-family) 91-073 (Blaylock/Crystal Heights rezone; File No. R-91-073). MOVED BY EDWARDS, SECONDED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER; COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS PRESENTED. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. MOTION CARRIED. Ordinance #4398 An ordinance was read changing the zoning classification of 22.6 acres of Rezone: The Bluffs, property located between Lake Washington Boulevard N. and I-405, east Lk Washington Blvd of Gene Coulon Memorial Beach Park from R-1 (single-family N & I-405, R-89-044 residential) to R-3 (medium density multi-family) (The Bluffs; File No. R-89-044). MOVED BY EDWARDS, SECONDED BY NELSON, COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS PRESENTED. ROLL CALL: 5 AYES: EDWARDS, SCHLITZER, NELSON, KEOLKER-WHEELER, STREDICKE. 1 NAY: TANNER. MOTION CARRIED. The following resolutions were presented for reading and adoption: Resolution #2966 A resolution was read authorizing the Mayor and city clerk to enter into CAG: 93-040, WSDOT an interlocal agreement with the Washington State Department of Interlocal Agreement, Transportation for preparation of plans, specifications, and estimates for Pedestrian/Bicycle construction of a pedestrian/bicycle facility to be located along Lake Facility Washington Boulevard. MOVED BY TANNER, SECONDED BY EDWARDS, COUNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED. Resolution #2967 A resolution was read amending Resolutions 2878 and 291,1 exempting Planning: Comprehensive certain applications from the Comprehensive Planning process. MOVED Plan, General BY EDWARDS, SECONDED BY SCHLITZER, COUNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED. Resolution #2968 A resolution was read extending the period of validity of land use Building: Development approvals and development permits for a period of 12 months for Permit Extensions approvals valid through 11/1/92 or major applications due to expire before 12/31/93. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY SCHLITZER, COUNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED. NEW BUSINESS Councilwoman Keolker-Wheeler requested that the Administration send a King County: Meeting letter to King County requesting advance notice of all county events. Notification Comprehensive Plan: Councilman Stredicke requested that small Comprehensive Plan zoning General maps be provided to Council, and he complimented staff on keeping up with the zoning map changes that have already been made. AUDIENCE COMMENT Lloyd Hoshide, 833 Kirkland Avenue NE, Renton 98056, submitted Citizen Comment: correspondence referencing the proposed 1500-seat sanctuary being built Hoshide - Comprehensive by Highlands Community Church on NE 10th and Kirkland Avenue NE. Plan, East Renton Mr. Hoshide expressed concern that designating churches as a permitted use will remove the forum to voice concerns that currently exists under the hearing examiner conditional use process to mitigate impacts of large developments. • CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON • ORDINANCE. NO. 4398 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF '.;RENTON, WASHINGTON CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF .;CERTAIN PROPERTIES WITHIN THE CITY OF RENTON FROM R-1, (SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL) TO R- . 3 (MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL) . (THE BLUFFS; FILE. NO. R-044- 89) . WHEREAS, under Chapter 31 ( Zening Code) of Title IV (Building • Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 known as the "Code of General . Ordinances of the City of Renton " as amended, and the maps and { reports adopted in conjunction therewith, the property hereinbelow described has heretofore been .zoned as R-1 ( Single-Family Residential) ; and WHEREAS, a proper petition for change of zone classification .of said property was originally filed with the Development Services Division on or about November 19',. 1992 , which petition was duly referred to the Hearing Examiner as a contract rezone for investigation, study, and publicj? ' hearing, and a public hearing . having been held thereon on or about December 15, 1992 , and said matter having been duly consideredby the Hearing Examiner, and the Hearing Examiner having recommended granting the ' rezone with conditions in the form of a contract rezone, and said zoning request being in conformity with the city Comprehensive Plan, as amended, and the City Council having duly;; considered all matters relevant thereto, and all parties having een heard appearing in support thereof or in opposition. thereto; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS : L ORDINANCE;' NO. 4398 SECTION I . The following `,;described property in the City of Renton is hereby rezoned to R-3 , (Multi-Family Residence) subject to the findings, conclusions, and decision of the Hearing Examiner • dated January 12, 1993, and sub..j ct further to the contract for .i' rezone filed under King .;,County Auditor ' s File No. 9304130971 and which said contract is hereby incorporated and made a part hereof as if fully set, forth, the Development Services Director is ,hereby authorized and directed to change the maps of the Zoning Ordinance, as amended, . to evidence said rezoning, to-wit: See - Exhibit "A" which is attached hereto and made a part hereof as if fully set forth herein (Said property, approximately 22 . 6 acres, is located between Lake Washington Boulevard North and I-405, east of Gene Coulon Memorial Beach Park) SECTION II . This Ordinance , shall be effective upon its passage, approval, and five days after its publication. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL ths 26th day of April 1993 . ::Marilyn etersen, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this 26i day of April , 1993 . • • ;.E 1 ymer, M r ,i - • ORDINANCE NO. 4398 Approved to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Date of Publication: April 30, 1993 ORD. 291 : 4/6/93 : as . 3 April 12, 1993 Renton City Council Minutes - Page 175 Councilman Tanner stated that any information obtained during his meeting with Pastor Amandus will be made public. (See later comment.) Public Works: Segale Councilman Stredicke requested clarification of the Public Works, Property Fill, Monroe Department memorandum concerning the fill height for the M. A. Segale Avenue property located on Monroe Avenue, opposite Mt. Olivet cemetery. Jay Covington will research the matter and report back to Council. Public Works: Employee Councilman Stredicke thanked Gregg Zimmermann, Utility Systems Recognition Director, for his excellent response to Mr. McBee concerning senior utility rate discounts. He also expressed appreciation to the Utility Systems Division for their efforts on Aquifer Awareness Day at McLendon Hardware. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS The following ordinances were presented for first reading and referred to the 4/26/93 Council meeting for final reading and adoption: Rezone: Crystal Heights, An ordinance was read changing the zoning classification of property 821 Sunset Blvd NE, R- located at 801 and 821 Sunset Boulevard NE from R-1 (single-family 91-073 residential) to R-3 (medium density multi-family) (Blaylock/Crystal Heights rezone; File No. R-91-073). MOVED BY EDWARDS, SECONDED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, COUNCIL REFER THE ORDINANCE FOR SECOND AND FINAL READING ON 4/26/93. CARRIED. Rezone: The Bluffs, An ordinance was read changing the zoning classification of property Lk Washington Blvd located between Lake Washington Boulevard N and I-405, east of Gene N & I-405, R-89-044 Coulon Memorial Beach Park from R-1 (single-family residential) to R-3 (medium density multi-family) (The Bluffs, File No. R-89-044). MOVED BY EDWARDS, SECONDED BY SCHLITZER, COUNCIL REFER THE ORDINANCE FOR SECOND AND FINAL READING ON 4/26/93. CARRIED. The following resolutions were presented for reading and adoption: Resolution #2961 " A resolution was read authorizing application for funding assistance for Parks: King County an acquisition project as provided by the King County Conservation Conservation Futures Futures Levy Fund Acquisition Program (Black River Riparian Forest). Grant Funds, Black River MOVED BY SCHLITZER, SECONDED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, Riparian Forest COUNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED. Resolution #2962 A resolution was read authorizing application for funding assistance for Parks: King County an acquisition project as provided by the King County Conservation Conservation Futures Futures Levy Fund Acquisition Program (Cedar River Trail). MOVED Grant Funds, Cedar BY SCHLITZER, SECONDED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, COUNCIL River Trail ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED. Resolution #2963 A resolution was read authorizing application for funding assistance for Parks: King County an acquisition project as provided by the King County Conservation Conservation Futures Futures Levy Fund Acquisition Program (May Creek Trail). MOVED BY Grant Funds, May Creek SCHLITZER, SECONDED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, COUNCIL Trail ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED. April 12, 1993 Renton City Council Minutes Page 170 AUDIENCE Bob Raphael, Service Linen Supply, 903 S. 4th Street, Renton 98055, COMMENT President of the Downtown Renton Association, expressed support of the Citizen Comment: City's proposed Economic Development position. (See Old Business, page Raphael - Economic 172.) Development Program Citizen Comment: Denny Lensegrav, Business Office Manager, Puget Power, 620 S. Grady Lensegrav - Way, Renton 98055, expressed Puget Power's support of the economic Economic development program to maintain or improve the business posture in the Development Program City. He stated that if the program is approved Puget Power and other businesses, and perhaps the Downtown Renton Association and Chamber of Commerce would commit to a partnership with the City in the endeavor. Councilman Tanner stated that he could not support the program unless business entities would also be willing to provide financial commitment and support. Mr. Lensegrav indicated that the proposal may be feasible but it would require a vote of the Board of Directors. (See Old Business; page 172.) CONSENT AGENDA Items on the consent agenda are adopted by one motion which follows the listing. Building: 1993 National Development Services Division requested adoption of the 1993 National Electrical Code Electrical Code, the Washington State Rules and Regulations, and Administrative Rules along with proposed amendments and fee increases. Refer to Planning & Development Committee. Community Event: Executive Division requested approval of permit fee waivers during 1993 Renton River Days, Renton River Days, and the installation of windsocks and banners on City Permit Fee street poles from 7/6 to 8/11. Refer to Community Services Committee. Waiver/Windsock & Banner Installation Rezone: Crystal Heights, Hearing Examiner recommended approval with covenants of Crystal 821 Sunset Blvd NE, R- Heights rezone (R;SA-91-073) from low density single-family residential 91-073 (R-1) to medium density multi-family (R-3), for .95 acres located at 801 and 821 Sunset Boulevard NE. Council concur. (See later ordinance.) Rezone: The Bluffs, Lk Hearing Examiner recommended approval with contract of The Bluffs Washington Blvd N & I- rezone (R;SA-89-044) from low density single-family residential (R-1) to 405, R-89-044 medium density multi-family (R-3), for 22.6 acres located between Lake Washington Boulevard N. and I-405, east of Gene Coulon Memorial Beach Park. Council concur. (See later ordinance.) H&HS: 1994 Community Human Services Department requested public hearing be set to adopt the Development Block Grant 1994 Community Development Block Grant policies and accept estimated Program Block Grant pass-through funds in the amount of $350,354 for 1994. Refer to Community Services Committee and set public hearing for 5/3/93. AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ss. County of King ) MARILYN MOSES ,being first duly sworn,upon oath, deposes and states: That on the 17TH day of December ,1998, affiant deposited in the mail of the United States a sealed envelope(s) containing a decision or recommendation with postage prepaid, addressed to the parties of record in the below entitled application or petition. Signature: ^. 1/.1 �l SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this /77'Y' day of 466l 1998. PACilth 71,0_,U4/7-dZAZA Notary Public ' and for the State of Washington, residing at /�t07 ,therein. Application,Petition, or Case No.: Fire Lane Citations -Allen Dauterman Harry Caraco The Decision or Recommendation contains a complete list of the Parties of Record. yy . CITY OF RENTON Hearing Examiner iieLL MEMORANDUM TO; MARILYN PETERSEN FROM: WANDA M. BRITTS RE: THE BLUFFS DATE: APRIL 1, 1993 Here come the Bluffs. The legal description has been approved by Ms. Fesser and she has included a good map. I presume that L. Warren will create the contract rezone. Attached to the agenda bills are copies of the Property Use Agreement, and Mr. Warren's memo to me about going ahead with Council review sans Covenants. If any of this is wrong, please contact me and I'll commit hara kari. CITY OF RENTON MEMORANDUM DATE: March 30, 1993 TO: Wanda Britts FROM: Sonja J. Fesser, Property Services)j SUBJECT: The Bluffs, File No.R; SA-044-89 Review of Legal Descriptions We have reviewed the latest submitted legal descriptions for The Bluffs and fmd them to be satisfactory. r cc: Paul Forsander .n...._ S CITY F RENTON `` Planning/Building/Public Works Department Earl Clymer, Mayor Lynn Guttmann,Administrator March 24, 1993 • Mr. Donald S. Bateman Broker 1266 North Bend Boulevard North Bend, WA 98045 SENT BY FAX E831-5206 AND US MAIQ SUBJECT: The Bluffs, File No. R-044-89, SA, ECF Property Management Comments on Legal Descriptions and Street Vacation. Dear Mr. Bateman: Attached are comments on the legal descriptions from Sonja Fesser, Property Management. Also attached is a memo from Sonja regarding the Street Vacation. The rezone is tentatively scheduled for Council's April 5th agenda. We will need to receive your revisions by the end of this week, for final signoff by property management before it goes to council. If you have any questions please call me at 277-6167. Sincerely, #(0/01/4—/7-'./ • Paul Forsander Project Manager Enclosure: 10 pages + this letter cc Don Erickson. - • • 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 PROPERTY USE AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT • THIS INSTRUMENT is executed this date in favor of the City of Renton, a municipal corporation (the "City") , by the undersigned property owners . (the "Owners") of the within described property. WITNESSET H: WHEREAS, the Owners are the owners of the property legally described on Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference (the "Property") ; and WHEREAS, the Owners' representative has filed a petition under File No. R; SA-044-89 for a rezone of the Property from Single Family (R-1) to multifamily medium density (R-3) with site plan approval and subject to a contract rezone; and WHEREAS, the Development Services Division has recommended . approval of the petition subject to a contract rezone and site plan approval, and with conditions and mitigation established by the Environmental Review Committee; and WHEREAS, the Hearing Examiner has recommended approval of the petition subject to the terms and conditions set forth herein, and has granted site plan approval subject to conditions; and WHEREAS, the City Council has found that the proposed use and development of the Property complies with the goals and • 274-PVDA.001 policies of the Comprehensive Plan, is in the public interest, and will not impair the public health, safety and welfare; and WHEREAS, the City Council has approved the rezone subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement, and subject to the execution and recording of this Agreement; NOW, THEREFORE, the Owners hereby covenant, bargain and agree on behalf of themselves and their successors and assigns that they will comply with the following conditions if the Property is rezoned to multifamily medium density (R-3) or its • equivalent zoning classification: Section 1. Development of the Property shall be accomplished in accordance with the following conditions: A. Development of the Property shall be in accordance with the site plan approved by the Hearing Examiner's Decision and Recommendation dated January 12 , 1993 ("Hearing Examiner's Decision") . Minor modifications to the site plan that are not major adjustments may be permitted subject to the approval of the Development Services Division. B. The Owners shall execute covenants running with the land that establish the maximum overall project density of no more than 7.3 condominium dwelling units per acre; and that establish the overall project height at 50 feet as shown in the approved site plan and exhibits to the Hearing Examiner's. Decision. - 2 - 274-PUDA.001 C. The Owners shall execute a covenants agreeing to establish the project as a residential condominium complex.. D. The Owners shall comply with all mitigation measures established by the Environmental Review Committee Mitigation Document published on October 9, 1992 . E. The Owners shall comply with the site plan approval conditions imposed by the Hearing Examiner in his January 12 , 1993 , and February 5, _ 1993 Decisions. • Section . 2 . This Agreement may be amended or modified by agreement between the Owners and the City; provided, such amended • agreement shall be approved by the legislative authority of the City by ordinance. Section 3 . It is further expressly agreed that in the event any covenant or condition or restriction contained herein or any portion thereof is invalid or void, such invalidity or voidness shall in no way affect any other covenant, condition or restriction contained herein. Section 4 . This Agreement and the approved site plan shall be valid for a period of five (5) years from the date hereof unless extended for an additional two (2) year period. In the event this Agreement is not amended or modified by agreement between the Owners and the City and construction of the project has not commenced within said time period.(s) , the zoning of the Property shall revert to the zoning classification that most closely reflects the land use designations for the Property as - 3 - 274-PUDA.001 depicted on the City's then current Land Use Map for the Comprehensive Plan. 611 DATED this 0 day of )1/9M , 1993 . OWNERS: v • Aief, ),4111- �' f 4,4 (41-1-U4 CI, 17c Gt STATE OF('WA`SHINGTON ) COUNTY OF KING On this day personally appeared before me T{%Dw,As r_'ookt , to me known to be the individual who executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that JA-( signed the instrument as free and voluntary act and deed, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and seal this �%'K`� day of Itt-tQ,\ , 1993 . NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of Washington, residing at n . ; My commission expires: t(_rq-tip( STATE OF WASHINGTON ) COUNTY OF KING On this day personally appeared before me l©ctg Roj5cxoke , to me known to be the individual who executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that signed the - 4 - 274-PUDA.001 instrument as free and voluntary act and deed, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and seal, this 0-'s day of rte(,N , 1993 . NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the. State of Washington, residing at 6rHA ; My commission expires: t{-(4-0 STATE OF WASHINGTON ) COUNTY OF KING ) On this day personally appeared before me p„iihe y , ;,k,4;A , to known to be the individual who executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that signed the instrument as ke.,- free and voluntary act and deed, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and seal this 614, day of 1►-v,,yy,k , 1993 . NOTAR PUBLIC in and for the State of Washington, residing at41,\ ,,, ; My commission expires: 9_14_1w STATE OF WASHINGTON ) COUNTY OF KING ) On this day personally appeared before me IN Ace e�u� , to me known to be the individual who executed the iithin and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that 41,,A signed the instrument as ,Q„,;4 free and voluntary act and deed, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. - 5 - 274-PUDA.001 • IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and seal this QZ'b day of , 1993 . • • • NOTARY UBLIC in and for the . State of Washington, residing ' at . 'IAJ . . ; My commission expires: m.14.4q STATE OF WASHINGTON ) • COUNTY OF KING ) On• this day personally appeared before me j khe. ,�: „v4o,j , to me known to be the individual who executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that signed the • instrument as ,� free and voluntary act and deed, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and seal this C;i= day of ja,,A,` , 1993 . • NOTARY UBLIC in and for the ' State of Washington, residing .. at ar'-e,,e. . ; My commission expires: y 11.44 STATE OF WASHINGTON ) COUNTY OF KING ) On this day personally appeared before me 31,,,• cott Martirkotat iC to me known to be the individual who ' executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that „KA signed the instrument as °Q , _ free and voluntary act and deed, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. • • • - 6 - • 274-PUDA.001 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and seal this ‘' day of 0, , 1993 . NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of Washington, residing at . . ; My commission expires: Gq-Jo-o ty • • - 7 - 274-PUDA.001 KIRKMAN LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS PARCEL A: THAT PORTION OF THE RIGHT OF WAY 200 . 00 FEET IN WIDTH DELINEATED ON C. D. HILLMAN ' S LAKE WASHINGTON GARDEN OF EDEN DIVISION NO. FIVE, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 11 OF PLATS, PAGE 83 , IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, AS "C AND P. S . R. R. " LYING BETWEEN THE WESTERLY PRODUCTION OF THE NORTH LINE OF LOT 322 OF SAID PLAT AND THE WESTERLY PRODUCTION OF THE SOUTH LINE OF LOT 317 OF SAID PLAT, AND LYING WESTERLY OF STATE HIGHWAY 405_ EXCEPT THAT PORTION LYING BETWEEN THE EASTERLY PRODUCTION OF THE NORTH LINE OF LOT 350 OF SAID PLAT AND THE WESTERLY PRODUCTION OF THE SOUTH LINE OF LOT 317 OF SAID PLAT; EXCEPT THAT PORTION LYING BETWEEN THE WESTERLY PRODUCTION OF THE NORTH LINE OF LOT 322 OF SAID PLAT AND THE WESTERLY PRODUCTION OF THE SOUTH LINE OF LOT 319 OF SAID PLAT; PARCEL B: THAT PORTION OF LOT 319 , C. D. HILLMAN ' S LAKE WASHINGTON GARDEN OF EDEN .DIVISION NO. FIVE, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 11 OF PLATS, PAGE 83 , IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, LYING WESTERLY OF STATE HIGHWAY NO. 405 , AND THAT PORTION OF PACIFIC COAST RAILROAD RIGHT OF WAY LYING ADJACENT THERETO WEST OF STATE HIGHWAY NO . 405; PARCEL C: THAT PORTION OF LOT 320, C. D. HILLMAN 'S LAKE WASHINGTON GARDEN OF EDEN DIVISION NO. FIVE, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 11 OF PLATS, PAGE 83 , IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, LYING • WESTERLY OF STATE HIGHWAY NO. 405 , AND THAT PORTION OF PACIFIC COAST RAILROAD RIGHT OF WAY LYING ADJACENT THERETO WEST OF STATE HIGHWAY NO. 405; PARCEL D: THAT PORTION OF LOTS 321 AND 322 , C. D. HILLMAN ' S LAKE WASHINGTON GARDEN OF EDEN DIVISION NO. FIVE, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED INIVOLUME 11 OF PLATS, PAGE 83 , IN KING COUNTY, WASHING- TON, LYING WESTERLY OF STATE HIGHWAY NO. 405 , AND THAT PORTION OF PACIFIC COAST RAILROAD RIGHT OF WAY, LYING ADJACENT THERETO WEST OF STATE HIGHWAY NO. 405 ; PARCEL E: LOT 348 OF C. D. HILLMAN ' S LAKE WASHINGTON GARDEN OF EDEN DIVI- SION NO, FIVE, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 11 OF PLATS„ PAGE 83 , IN KING COUNTY WASHINGTON; PARCEL F: LOT 351 , C. D. HILLMAN ' S LAKE WASHINGTON GARDEN OF EDEN, DIVISION NO. FIVE, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 11 OF PLATS, PAGE 83 , IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; EXCEPT THE WESTERLY 60 FEET THEREOF CONDEMNED IN KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT CAUSE NUMBER 115311 FOR RENTON-NEWPORT ROAD; SUBJECT TO AN EASEMENT FOR INGRESS AND EGRESS OVER THE SOUTH 50 FEET THEREOF. ALL SITUATED IN THE S W 1 /4 OF SECTION FIVE TOWNSHIP 23 N RANGE 5 EAST, , WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN. MARTINDALE LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS PARCEL A: • LOT 349 , C . D. HILLMAN ' S LAKE WASHINGTON GARDEN OF EDEN DIVISION NO. FIVE, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN VOLUME 1 '1 OF PLATS, PAGE 83 , IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF VACATED 104TH AVENUE SOUTHEAST (LAKEVIEW BOULEVARD) , VACATED BY THE CITY OF RENTON UNDER ORDI- NANCE NUMBER 2958 ; SERVED BY AN EASEMENT FOR INGRESS AND EGRESS OVER THE SOUTH 50 FEET OF LOT 351 OF SAID PLAT. PARCEL B: LOT 350 , C. D. HILLMAN ' S LAKE WASHINGTON GARDEN •OF EDEN DIVISION NO. FIVE, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 11 OF PLATS, PAGE 83 , IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; EXCEPT THE WESTERLY 60 FEET THEREOF CONDEMNED IN KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT CASE NUMBER 11581 FOR RENTON NEWPORT ROAD; TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF VACATED 104TH AVENUE SOUTHEAST (LAKEVIEW BOULEVARD) VACATED BY THE CITY OF RENTON UNDER ORDI- NANCE NUMBER 2958; TOGETHER WITH AN EASEMENT FOR INGRESS AND EGRESS OVER THE SOUTH 50 FEET OF LOT 351 OF SAID PLAT. PARCEL C: LOTS 345 AND 346 , C. D. HILLMAN ' S LAKE WASHINGTON GARDEN O.F EDEN DIVISION NO. FIVE, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 11 OF PLATS, PAGE 83 , IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; AS ADJUSTED BY BOUNDARY LINE AGREEMENT (RECORDING NUMBER 8506240829 ) AND DEPICTED ON KING COUNTY SURVEY, RECORDING NUMBER 8506249011 , IN VOLUME 45, PAGE 111 , RECORDS OF KING COUNTY WASHINGTON. TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF VACATED 104TH AVENUE SOUTHEAST (LAKEVIEW BOULEVARD) VACATED BY THE CITY OF RENTON UNDER ORDI- NANCE NUMBER 4029 . • PARCEL D: THAT PORTION OF THE RIGHT OF WAY 200 . 00 FEET IN WIDTH DELINEATED ON C. D . HILLMAN ' S LAKE WASHINGTON GARDEN OF EDEN DIVISION NO_ FIVE,, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 11 OF FLATS, PAGE 83 , IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, AS "C AND P. S . R. R. " LYING BETWEEN THE EASTERLY PRODUCTION OF THE NORTH LINE OF LOT 350 OF SAID PLAT AND THE WESTERLY PRODUCTION OF THE SOUTH LINE OF LOT 317 OF SAID PLAT; EXCEPT THAT PORTION THEREOF CONVEYED TO THE STATE OF WASHINGTON FOR HIGHWAY PURPOSES BY DEEDS RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBERS 4668942 AND 6014374 . PARCEL E: THAT PORTION OF THE PACIFIC COAST RAILROAD COMPANY ' S NEWCASTLE BRANCH RIGHT OF WAY, BEING A STRIP OF LAND 200 FEET IN WIDTH, 100 FEET OF SUCH WIDTH LYING ON EITHER SIDE OF THE RIGHT OF WAY CENTERLINE AS THE SAME IS NOW ESTABLISHED OVER AND ACROSS THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 5 , TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, AND BEING BOUNDED ON THE SOUTH BY THE SOUTH LINE OF LOT 323 , C. D . HILLMAN ' S LAKE WASHINGTON GARDEN OF EDEN ADDITION TO SEATTLE DIVISION NO. 5, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, RECORD- ED IN VOLUME 11 OF PLATS, PAGE 83 , IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, PRODUCED WESTERLY OVER AND ACROSS SAID RIGHT OF WAY AND ON THE NORTH BY THE NORTH LINE OF LOT 325 , SAID PLAT PRODUCED WEST OVER AND ACROSS SAID RIGHT OF WAY; EXCEPT THAT PORTION THEREOF CONVEYED TO THE STATE OF WASHINGTON BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 4648616 . ALL SITUATED IN THE S W 1 /4 OF SECTION FIVE TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WI.LLAMETTE MERIDIAN. COOKE LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS PARCEL A: LOT 334 , C. D. HILLMAN ' S LAKE WASHINGTON GARDEN OF EDEN DIVISION NO. FIVE, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 11 OF PLATS, PAGE 83 , IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; EXCEPT THAT PORTION THEREOF LYING EASTERLY OF THE WESTERLY MARGIN OF PRIMARY STATE HIGHWAY NO. 1 (SR 405 ) AS ESTABLISHED BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 4683135 . PARCEL B: LOT 335, C. D. HILLMAN ' S LAKE WASHINGTON GARDEN OF EDEN DIVISION NO. FIVE, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 11 OF PLATS, PAGE 83 , IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; EXCEPT THAT PORTION THEREOF LYING EASTERLY OF THE WESTERLY MARGIN OF PRIMARY STATE HIGHWAY NO. 1 (SR 405 ) AS ESTABLISHED BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 4682225; TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF THE PACIFIC COAST RAILROAD COMPA- NY ' S NEWCASTLE BRANCH RIGHT OF WAY, BEING A STRIP OF SAID RIGHT OF WAY. 200 FEET IN WIDTH, 100 FEET OF SUCH WIDTH LYING ON EITHER SIDE OF THE CENTERLINE OF SAID RIGHT OF WAY, AS THE SAME WAS LOCATED ON OCTOBER 15, 1946 AND BOUNDED ON THE , NORTH BY THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF LOT 333 , C. D. HILLMAN ' S LAKE WASHINGTON GARDEN OF EDEN DIVISION NO. FIVE, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 11 OF PLATS, PAGE 83 , IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, PRODUCED WESTERLY OVER AND ACROSS SAID RIGHT OF WAY, AND ON THE SOUTH BY THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF LOT 336 OF SAID PLAT, PRODUCED WESTERLY OVER AND ACROSS SAID RIGHT OF WAY; EXCEPT THAT PORTION THEREOF LYING EASTERLY OF THE WESTERLY MARGIN OF PRIMARY STATE HIGHWAY NO. 1 (SR 405 ) AS ESTABLISHED BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 4648616 . PARCEL C: THAT PORTION OF THE PACIFIC COAST RAILROAD COMPANY ' S RIGHT OF WAY IN SECTION 5 , TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERID- IAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, LYING BETWEEN THE NORTH AND SOUTH MARGINS OF THIRD AVENUE, EXTENDED TO THE WEST, AS DEFINED ON C, D. HILLMAN' S LAKE WASHINGTON GARDEN OF EDEN DIVISION NO. FIVE, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 11 OF PLATS, PAGE 83 , IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, AND LYING WESTERLY OF A LINE DRAWN PARALLEL WITH AND 180 FEET WESTERLY, WHEN MEASURED RADIALLY, FROM THE LINE OF SURVEY OF SR 405 , RENTON TO KENNYDALE. THE .AFOREMENTIONED PROPERTIES ARE SITUATED IN THE N W 1 /4 AND S W 1/4 OF SECTION FIVE TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN. MATSUOKA LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS LOT 344, C. D. HILLMAN ' S LAKE WASHINGTON GARDEN OF EDEN, DIVISION NO. FIVE, ACCORDING TO PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN VOLUME 11 OF PLATS, PAGE 83 , RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, AS ADJUSTED BY A BOUNDARY LINE AGREEMENT (RECORDING NUMBER 8506240829 ) AND DEPICTED ON KING COUNTY SURVEY, RECORDING NUMBER 8506249011 , IN VOLUME 45 , PAGE 111 , RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF VACATED 104TH AVENUE SOUTHEAST (LAKEVIEW BOULEVARD) VACATED BY THE CITY OF RENTON UNDER ORDI- NANCE NUMBER 4029 . ALL SITUATED IN THE S W 1 /4 OF SECTION FIVE, TOWNSHIP 23 N. , RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN. LOTTO/SEGUR LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS LOTS 352 AND 353 , C. D. HILLMAN' S LAKE WASHINGTON GARDEN OF EDEN, DIVISION NO. FIVE, ACCORDING TO PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 11 OF PLATS, PAGE 83 , IN KING COUNTY WASHINGTON; EXCEPT THAT PORTION THEREOF CONVEYED TO KING COUNTY FOR NEWPORT- RENTON ROAD BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 1036529 . ALL SITUATED IN THE S W 1 /4 OF SECTION 5 TOWNSHIP 23 N RANGE 5 E WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN. I 9' 0 . . ' CITY_ _ ,-OF RENTON , "LL Office of the City" Attorney Earl Clymer, Mayor. " Lawrence J. Warren , " .MEMORANDUM EIVED - MAR 2 21993 To:'- , ' Wanda Britts, Hearing Examiner's Secretary CITY OF RENTON. . -From: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney HEARING EXAMINER Dater ' March 18, 1993 - Subject: ' The•Bluffs -File.No R;SA-044-89 • This'memorandum is to confirm our telephone conversation of March 18, 1993 During that ,' . , ' . conversation I indicated to you that I,thought it was appropriate'to refer The Bluffs rezone to the city,council for action. This file is somewhat different from the others that we handle in that,the +_ rezone is being done by means of a contract rezone. In that contract rezone is contained various promises to'file applicable covenants; security-and other required documents. Ifthose,items are not " accomplished, then the contract rezone is invalid. , . , „ -Additionally, the planning for this 'proj ect' anticipates that the`various -covenant s and other • ' documents will be prepared and filed prior'to issuance of the building permit. ;The process will be managed by the Development Services'Division; so there should not be a.problem with follow-up.. • ' . I am attaching a-copy of'a memorandum that I received from Don Erickson setting forth his ' thoughts., He is in agreement with my position that we should forward.this file to the council for ` action. We might not be so,inclined'to move, but The Bluffs has been'around for a long time and ' ' we would like-the rezone adopted ,prior to council adoption of the, new. Comprehensive Plan, - Zoning Map and Zoning Ordinance., - If you have any follow-up questions please let me know. ,- , . . 11 Lawrence J. W rren ' LJW:as. _ Encl. ._. • cc: ' Mayor Earl:Clymer . - _ : ' . , . A8:95:48. . . • • Post Office.Box 626 - 100 S 2nd Street - Renton; Washington 98057 - (206)255-8678 " + s N � ♦ � off O O F RENT CITY N� MEMORANDUM Date: March 17, 1993 To: Larry Warren From: Don Erickson Staff Contact: ` Paul Forsander, 277-6167 Subject: The Bluffs, File No. R; SA-044-89: Response to Wanda Brills Memo dated March 16, 1993. Larry, as you and I discussed yesterday, it is critical that the Bluffs Rezone be put on the Council's agenda as soon as possible because of the pending new interim zoning The Bluffs Rezone is currrently being held in the Hearing Examiner's office, pending 'submission of covenants by the applicant. In order to help move things along, we have identified some issues or areas of concern which you may wish to discuss with the Hearing Examiner: 1. The Hearing Examiner's January 12, 1993 Decision did not require submission of any covenants or Homeowners Association Bylaws, prior to Council action on the rezone request. The applicant has indicated that he would have appealed the Examiner's Decision if submission of covenants had been made conditions to be satisfied prior to Council Action. We believe that requiring these covenants now, denies the applicant due process. 2. There appears to be some confusion about the timing and responsiblitiy for land use (covenant) enforcement. For example, the mere recording of covenants does not, by itself, insure that conditions will enforced prior to development. The Development Services Division of P/B/PW is responsible for land use enforcement, which includes monitoring of applicant's compliance with conditions and/or covenants imposed by the ERC, Site Plan Review Committee and Hearing Examiner. Except in the case of a plat or subdivision, most covenants are submitted, approved and recorded prior to the issuance of a Building or Construction Permit. In fact, the Hearing Examiner's January 12, 1993 Site Plan Approval Decision for the Bluffs recognized this process: "The covenants shall be approved by the Development Services Division and City Attorney prior to the issuance of any Construction or Building Permits." 3. If this were a typical rezone, covenants would likely be the appropriate vehicle to tie-down the project parameters. This proposal is not typical, since it began as a PUD application and last fall was amended to be a Site Plan Approval with Contract Rezone. Because of the sensative nature of the site and its highly visible location, a contract rezone was determined to afford the best protections for the City. As you and I previously discussed, the proposed Contract Rezone Agreement must include language that implements the Hearing Examiner's Recommended Rezone conditions relating to use, bulk, density and height, and binds the applicant to construct the site plan and improvements as approved. As we also discussed, the other (Site Plan Approval) conditions can be enforced at the time of issuance of the Building Permit. These can either take the form of covenants, as spelled out in the January 12th Decision, or as conditions of the Building Permit, itself. 4. The Draft Contract Rezone Agreement, which has been reviewed and tentatively approved by Development Services and your office, incorporates all of the Recommend Rezone conditions contained in the Hearing Examiner's January 12, 1993 Decision. memo2 Perhaps the concerns discussed in Wanda Britt's memo of March 16th can be addressed by letting the Hearing Examiner review and concur with the Contract Rezone Agreement, prior to sending it as part of the Agenda Bill to Council. I hope that you can take this up with Fred this week, so we can proceed with the Agenda Bill. I will be out of the office this Thursday and Friday. If you need any additional information, please contact Paul Forsander at 277-6167. memo2 4. 0 CITY OF RENTON Hearing Examiner MEMORANDUM TO: LARRY WARREN FROM: WANDA M. BRITTS RE: THE BLUFFS,•FILE NO. R;SA-044-89 DATE: MARCH, 16, 1993 I understand that you were inquiring as to why the above referenced file has not yet moved out of the Hearing Examiner's office. As you can see by the enclosure, there are some fairly extensive corrections needed to the legal description, which have been noted in a letter to Mr. Bateman dated March 2, 1993. Also, I have not received the restrictive covenants required to be executed prior to Council approval. These covenants running with the land establish project-density and height, set aside and protect green belts and undisturbed slopes, establish the project as a residential condominium, cover landscape maintenance, secure use of all recreational facilities by all residents and establish a condominium homeowners association for facilities maintenance and participation in the condominium homeowners association. Marilyn and I are concerned about who will enforce this requirement prior to development if covenants are not executed and recorded prior to adoption of the rezone ordinance. If there is no concern, please let me know. • Donald S. Bateman, Broker D • S • I 1266 North Bend Blvd.•North Bend,WA 98045-8943 (206) 831-5203• 1-800-758-0231 •Fax (206) 831-5206 . GF�C TYGFy�'VI'P kFNTpNN/NG March 15 , 1 9 9 3 A144)./519. 93 Paul D. Forsander � Project Manager City of Renton Planning/Building/Public Works Department 200 Mill Avenue South Renton WA 98055 RE: The Bluffs Project, File Number R-044-89 ,• SA, ECF Dear Mr . Forsander, Enclosed is the` Property Use and Development Agreement for the subject property. All property owners have signed the agreement and their signatures have been notarized. Let us know if we can be of further assistance. Si oerely, / f Donald S. Bateman cc : Colin Quinn 3318 239th Avenue S E Issaquah WA 98G27 DSB:sb PROPERTY USE AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT THIS INSTRUMENT is executed this date in favor of the City of Renton, a municipal corporation (the "City") , by the undersigned property owners (the "Owners") of the within described property. W I T N E S S E T H: WHEREAS, the Owners are the owners of the property legally described on Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference (the "Property") ; and WHEREAS, the Owners' representative has filed a petition under File No. R; SA-044-89 for a rezone of the Property from Single Family (R-1) to multifamily medium density (R-3) with site plan approval and subject to a contract rezone; and WHEREAS, the Development Services Division has recommended approval of the petition subject to a contract rezone and site plan approval, and with conditions and mitigation established by the Environmental Review Committee; and WHEREAS, the Hearing Examiner has recommended approval of the petition subject to the terms and conditions set forth herein, and has granted site plan approval subject to conditions; and WHEREAS, the City Council: has found that the proposed use and development of the Property complies with the goals and 274-PI10A.001 policies of the Comprehensive Plan, is in the public interest, and will not impair the public health, safety and welfare; and WHEREAS, the City Council has approved the rezone subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement, and subject to the execution and recording of this Agreement; NOW, THEREFORE, the Owners hereby covenant, bargain and agree on behalf of themselves and their successors and assigns that they will comply with the following conditions if the Property is rezoned to multifamily medium density (R-3) or its equivalent zoning classification: Section 1. Development of the Property shall be accomplished in accordance with the following conditions: A. Development of the Property shall be in accordance with the site plan approved by the Hearing Examiner's Decision and Recommendation dated January 12, 1993 ("Hearing Examiner's Decision") . Minor modifications to the site plan that are not major adjustments may be permitted subject to the approval of the Development Services Division. B. The Owners shall execute covenants running with the land that establish the maximum overall project density of no more than 7.3 condominium dwelling units per acre; and that establish the overall project height at 50 feet as shown in the approved site plan and exhibits to the Hearing Examiner's Decision. - 2 - z»1'UOA.001 C. The Owners shall execute a covenants agreeing to establish the project as a residential condominium complex. D. The Owners shall comply with all mitigation easures established by the Environmental Review Committee Mitigation Document published on October 9, 1992. E. The Owners shall comply with the site plan approval conditions imposed by the Hearing Examiner in his January 12, 1993 , and February 5, 1993 Decisions. Section 2 . This Agreement may be amended or modified by agreement between the Owners and the City; provided, such amended agreement shall be approved by the legislative authority of the City by ordinance. Section 3 . It is further expressly agreed that in the event any covenant or condition or restriction contained herein or any portion thereof is invalid or void, such invalidity or voidness shall in no way affect any other covenant, condition or restriction contained herein. • Section 4. This Agreement and the approved site plan shall be valid for a period of five (5) years from the date hereof unless extended for an additional two (2) year period. In the event this Agreement is not amended or modified by agreement between the Owners and the City and construction of the project has not commenced within said time period(s) , the zoning of the Property shall revert to the zoning classification that most ; closely reflects the land use designations for the Property as - 3 - 2144U0A.001 • depicted on the City's then current Land Use Map for the Comprehensive Plan. DATED this 8 day of `jiJ W41- , 1993 . OWNERS: ( ";;Iriget.-.5 (14 2‘d/A__ 166 • Cl,1C1/1 , mil C'( . �C,' STATE OF(4.7ASHINGTON ) COUNTY OF KING ) On this day personally appeared before me taNiks# (06kt , to me known to be the individual who executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that Jn..( signed the instrument as J free and voluntary act and deed, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. IN WITNESS WHER OF, I have hereunto set my hand and seal this ea day of rtgLret , 1993 . NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of Washington, residing at kler ie gf ; My commission expires: ij_/1-44 STATE OF WASHINGTON ) COUNTY OF KING ) On this day personally appeared before me 7oc,l Mq. aakci , to me known to be the individual who executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that toa signed the - 4 - z7owoA.00t instrument as free and voluntary act and deed, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and seal this �'�^ day of linztor\ , 1993 . NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of Washington,� residing at '�n Iy� I.J ; My commission expires: K-(4 qri STATE OF WASHINGTON ) COUNTY OF KING ) On this day personally appeased before me 7at1/4.1;,,e. , ; 61;A ., to me known to be the individual who executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that signed the instrument as bye free and voluntary act and deed, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and seal this ' day of 0-1a, , 1993 . . .• X�L•v` . NOTAR PUBLIC in and for the • State of Washington, residing at 0.►sr-f4, ; My commission expires: q_444/ STATE OF WASHINGTON ) I ) COUNTY OF KING , • ) On this day personally appeared before me Yoyce SeTu.r- , to me known to be the individual who executed the ttithin and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that ,L,QA. signed the , instrument as �1 free and voluntary act and deed, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. - 5 - 27 UD&OOI IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and seal this ZV ' day of „d„ , 1993 . A FT NOTARY UBLIC in and for the State of Washington, residing at pc,R,CW ; My commission expires: y-14-q y STATE OF WASHINGTON ) COUNTY OF KING ) On this day personally appeared before me 04.1nd, T Ldt , to me known to be the individual who executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that signed the instrument as 4,1,t free and voluntary act and deed, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and seal this 1 3':= day of „,pA , 1993 . , . 745,74 . . NOTARY UBLIC in and for the State of Washington, residing at �e,,A ; My . commission expires: 4 .0.q' STATE OF WASHINGTON ) COUNTY OF KING ) On this day personally appeared before me ,Thy.Scetf P1sufi.kdotek to me known to be the individual who executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that 2K.A signed the instrument as free and voluntary act and deed, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. - 6 - 274-PUDA.001 . IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and seal this 1 day of , 1993 . NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of Washington, residing at � d ; My commission expires: t -ro-o c1 • • • - 7 - f - MARTINDALE EXHIBIT A - • Lots 345, 346, 349- and 350 Hillmans • Lak - Washington Garden of Eden ," Renton, Washington POR PC R/W LY BTW 43 LN Tract 317 PROD W of • C. D. Hillman Lk Wn Garden of Eden #5 Less o. • Road and St Hwy and POR PC R/t•, shown in plat C. D. Hillman Lk Wn Garden of Eden , ' Div No 5. LY West ,of State Hwy 405 and LY S of easterly prolongation of the most northerly line of Tra.c.t 350 of ' said plat to the west line of • said hiohway. ALL SITUATED IN TH S W 4 OF SECTION 5 TOWNSHIP 23 N RANGE 5 E W M • • . • • • • KIRKMAN ,• LEGAL DESCRIPTI.ONS PARCEL A: st THAT PORTION OF THE RIGHT OF WAY :200 . 00 FEET IN WIDTH DELINEATED ON C. D . HILLMAN ' S LAKE WASHINGTON GARDEN OF EDEN DIVISION NO. FIVE, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 11 OF PLATS., PAGE 83 , IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, AS "C AND P . S . R . R. " LYING BETWEEN THE WESTERLY PRODUCTION OF THE NORTH LINE OF LOT 322 OF SAID PLAT AND THE WESTERLY PRODUCTION OF THE SOUTH LINE OF LOT 317 OF SAID PLAT, AND" LYING WESTERLY OF STATE HIGHWAY 405 . EXCEPT THAT PORTION LYING BETWEEN'`. THE EASTERLY PRODUCTION OF THE NORTH LINE OF LOT 350 OF SAID PLAT AND THE WESTERLY PRODUCTION OF THE SOUTH LINE OF LOT 317 OF SAIDPLAT; EXCEPT THAT PORTION LYING BETWEEN' THE WESTERLY PRODUCTION OF THE NORTH LINE OF LOT 322 OF SAID PLAT AND THE WESTERLY PRODUCTION OF THE SOUTH LINE OF LOT 319 OF SAIDPLAT; PARCEL 13: • THAT PORTION OF LOT 319 , C. D . HILLMAN ' S LAKE WASHINGTON GARDEN OF EDEN DIVISION NO . FIVE, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 11 OF PLATS, PAGE 83 , IIV KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; LYING WESTERLY OF STATE HIGHWAY NO. 405,, AND THAT PORTION OF PACIFIC COAST RAILROAD RIGHT OF WAY LYING ADJACENT THERETO WEST OF STATE HIGHWAY NO . 405 ; Ci. PARCEL C: • THAT PORTION OF LOT 320 , C . D. HiLLMAN ' S LAKE WASHINGTON GARDEN OF EDEN DIVISION NO. FIVE, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 11 OF PLATS, PAGE 83 , IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, LYING WESTERLY OF STATE HIGHWAY NO. 405, AND THAT PORTION OF PACIFIC COAST RAILROAD RIGHT OF WAY LYING!:.ADJACENT THERETO WEST OF STATE HIGHWAY NO. 405; PARCEL D: • THAT PORTION OF LOTS 321 AND 322 ,AC. D. HILLMAN ' S LAKE WASHINGTON GARDEN OF EDEN DIVISION NO. FIVE; ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 111 OF PLATS, PAGE 83 , IN KING COUNTY, WASHING- TON, LYING WESTERLY OF STATE HIGHWAY NO . 405 , AND THAT PORTION OF PACIFIC COAST RAILROAD RIGHT OF WAY, LYING ADJACENT THERETO WEST OF STATE HIGHWAY NO . 405 ; PARCEL : LOT 348 OF C. D. HILLMAN ' S, LAKE WASHINGTON GARDEN OF EDEN DIVI•- SION NO . FIVE, ACCORDING TO THE 'PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 1 OF PLATS, PAGE 83 , IN KING COUN# WASHINGTON; PARCEL F: LOT 351 , C . D, HILLMAN ' S LAKE WASHHINGTON GARDEN OF EDEN, DIVISION NO, FIVE; ACCORDING TO THE FLAT THEREOF RECORDED TN VOLUME 11 OF PLATS ; PAGE 83 , IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; • EXCEPT THE WESTER:I.LY 60 FEET THEREOF CONDEMNED IN KING COUNTY . SUPERIOR COURT CAUSE NUMBER 115310. FOR RENTON—NEWPORT ROAD; SUBJECT TO AN EASEMENT FOR INGRESS AND EGRESS OVER THE SOUTH 50 FEET THEREOF. •!1•::, • ALL SITUATED IN THE S W 1 /4 OF SECTION FIVE TOWNSHIP 23 N RANGE 5 ,cn • EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN. rU • • • ‘!: • • rq. • .H011 r 0"4 MARTINDALE LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS PARCEL A: l: LOT 349 , C , D . HILLMAN ' S LAKE WAS,HINGTON GARDEN OF EDEN DIVISION NO , FIVE, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT T,jHEREOF, RECORDED IN VOLUME 11 OF PLATS; PAGE 83 , IN KING COUNTY, W:'A`SHINGTON; • TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF VACATED 104TH AVENUE SOUTHEAST (LAKEVIEW BOULEVARD) , VACATED BYTHE CITY OF RENTON UNDER ORDI-- NANCE NUMBER 2958 ; SERVED BY AN EASEMENT FOR INGRESS AND EGRESS OVER THE SOUTH 50 FEET OF LOT 351 OF SAID PLAT. • PARCEL B: J LOT 350 , C. D. HILLMAN ' S LAKE WASHINGTON GARDEN OF EDEN DIVISION NO. FIVE, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 11 OF PLATS , PAGE 83 , IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; EXCEPT THE WESTERLY 60 FEET THEREOF CONDEMNED IN KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT CASE NUMBER 11581 rOR RENTON NEWPORT ROAD; TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF' 'VACATED 104TH AVENUE SOUTHEAST (LAKEVIEW BOULEVARD) VACATED BY; THE CITY OF RENTON UNDER ORDI- NANCE NUMBER 2958; TOGETHER WITH AN EASEMENT FOR INGRESS AND EGRESS OVER THE SOUTH 50 FEET OF LOT 351 OF SAID PLAT. PARCEL C : •+11. LOTS 345 AND 346 , C. D. HILLMAN ' SLAKE WASHINGTON GARDEN OF EDEN DIVISION NO . FIVE, ACCORDING TOTHE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 11 OF PLATS, PAGE 83 , IiV ',KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; AS ADJUSTED BY BOUNDARY LINE AGREEMENT (RECORDING NUMBER 8506240829 ) AND DEPICTED ON KING COUNTY SURVEY, RECORDING NUMBER 8506249011 ; IN VOLUME 45 , PAGE 111 , RECORDS OF'. KING COUNTY WASHINGTON. TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF VACATED 104TH AVENUE SOUTHEAST (LAKEVIEW BOULEVARD) VACATED BY, E CITY OF RENTON UNDER ORDI- NANCE NUMBER 4029 . j: • • PARCEL D: •,, • THAT PORTION OF THE RIGHT OF WAY• 200 . 00 FEET IN WIDTH DELINEATED ON C . D . HILLMAN ' S LAKE WASHINGTON GARDEN OF EDEN DIVISION NO. FIVE, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 11 OF ,�I. PLATS, PAGE 83 , IN KING COUNTY, A'FISHINGTON, AS "C AND P. S . R. P. " LYING BETWEEN THE EASTERLY PRODUCT I ON OF THE NORTH LINE OF LOT 350 OF SAID PLAT AND THE WE 'T,E.RLY PRODUCTION OF THE SOUTH ;;Irl�• LINE OF LOT 317 OF SAID PLAT; EXCEPT THAT PORTION THEREOF CONVED TO THE STATE OF WASHINGTON FOR HIGHWAY PURPOSES BY DEEDS RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBERS • 4668942 AND 6014874 . PARCEL E: '! ' THAT PORTION OF THE PACIFIC' COAST, RAILROAD COMPANY ' S NEWCASTLE �hl. • BRANCH RIGHT OF WAY, BEING A STRI ;, OF LAND 200 FEET, IN WIDTH, 100 FEET OF SUCH WIDTH LYING ON EITHER SIDE OF THE RIGHT OF WAy CENTERLINE AS THE SAME IS NOW ESTABLISHED' OVER AND ACROSS THE .. NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWES,T• QUARTER OF SECTION 5, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMEJ,TE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, AND BEING BOUNDED ON,kTHE SOUTH BY THE SOUTH LINE OF LOT 323 , C. D. HILLMAN ' S LAKE WASH'INGTON GARDEN OF EDEN ADDITION TO SEATTLE DIVISION NO . 5 , ACCORD'ING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, RECORD— ED IN VOLUME 11 OF PLATS, PAGE 8'3', IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, PRODUCED WESTERLY OVER AND ACROSS. SAID RIGHT OF WAY AND ON THE NORTH BY THE NORTH LINE OF LOT 325 ; SAID PLAT PRODUCED WEST OVER • AND ACROSS SAID RIGHT OF WAY; EXCEPT THAT PORTION THEREOF CONVEYED TO THE STATE OF WASHINGTON BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING ,N;UMBER 4648616 . s. ALL SITUATED IN THE S W 1 /4 OF SECTION FIVE TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN:' ' • r, t AY I�I y , `11 ,4I tlrl ,t{. • iiF.. 1,1i`. cif.; 'r+ COOKE ie • LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS i1< PARCEL A : LOT 334 , C. D. HILLMAN ' S LAKE WASHINGTON GARDEN OF EDEN DIVISION s;. NO. FIVE, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 11 OF PLATS; PAGE 83 , IN KING COUNTY, WIASHINGTON; EXCEPT THAT PORTION THEREOF LYING9EASTERLY OF THE WESTERLY MARGIN OF PRIMARY STATE HIGHWAY NO. 1 (}SR 405 ) AS ESTABLISHED BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER .416 8 31 3 5 . PARCEL i B : • LOT 335 , C. D. HILLMAN ' S LAKE WASHINGTON 'GARDEN OF EDEN DIVISION NO . FIVE, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 11 OF PLATS, PAGE 83 , IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; EXCEPT THAT PORTION THEREOF LYING';' EASTERLY OF THE WESTERLY MARGIN OF PRIMARY STATE HIGHWAY NO. 1 (SR 405 ) AS ESTABLISHED BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 4.82225; TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF THE PACIFIC COAST RAILROAD COMPA— NY ' S NEWCASTLE BRANCH RIGHT OF WAY, BEING A STRIP OF SAID RIGHT IL OF WAY 200 FEET IN WIDTH, 100 FEE , OF SUCH WIDTH LYING ON EITHER SIDE OF THE CENTERLINE OF SAID .. 'IGHT OF WAY, AS THE SAME WAS LOCATED ON OCTOBER 15, 1946 AND BOUNDED ON THE NORTH BY THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF LOT 333 , C. D. ,HILLMAN ' S LAKE WASHINGTON GARDEN OF EDEN DIVISION NO. FIVE, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 11 OF PLATS, PAGE 83 '' IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, PRODUCED WESTERLY OVER AND ACROSS SAID RIGHT OF WAY, AND ON THE SOUTH BY THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF ;LOT 336 OF SAID PLAT, PRODUCED WESTERLY OVER AND ACROSS SAID RIGHT OF WAY; EXCEPT THAT PORTION THEREOF LYINGEASTERLY OF THE WESTERLY MARGIN i'•I1 OF PRIMARY STATE HIGHWAY NO. 1 (;SR 405 ) AS ESTABLISHED BY DEED RECORDED UNDER .RECORDING NUMBER 46,48616 . PARCEL C: • t� iI THAT PORTION OF THE PACIFIC COASTRAILROAD COMPANY ' S RIGHT OF WAY IN SECTION 5 , TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH,, ,RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERID— IAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON .' LYING BETWEEN THE NORTH AND SOUTH MARGINS OF THIRD AVENUE, E ,{TENDED TO THE WEST, AS DEFINED ON C. D. HILLMAN ' S LAKE WASHINGTON GARDEN OF EDEN DIVISION NO, • FIVE, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 11 OF PLATS , PAGE 83 , IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, AND LYING WESTERLY OF A LINE 'DRAWN PARALLEL WITH AND 40 FEET WESTERLY, WHEN MEASURED RADIALLY, FROM THE LINE OF SURVEYd ,OF SR 405 , RENTON TO KENNYDALE. THE AFOREMENTIONED PROPERTIES ARESITUATED IN THE N W 1 /4 AND S W :.A . 1/4 OF SECTION FIVE TOWNSHIP 23 ,NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN. (;1 II i HI'1 I)! • > f • tl • A. • MATSUOKA LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS LOT 344 , C . D. HILLMAN ' S LAKE WAS,HINGTON GARDEN OF EDEN, DIVISION NO. FIVE, ACCORDING TO PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN VOLUME 11 OF PLATS, PAGE 83 , RECORDS OF KING„COUNTY, WASHINGTON, AS ADJUSTED BY A BOUNDARY LINE AGREEMENT. (REICORDING NUMBER 8506240829 ) AND DEPICTED ON KING COUNTY SURVEY, HRECORDING NUMBER 8506249011 , IN VOLUME 45 , PAGE 111 , RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF VACATED 104TH AVENUE SOUTHEAST (LAKEVIEW BOULEVARD) VACATED BY ,:THE CITY OF RENTON UNDER ORDI- NANCE NUMBER 4029 . ALL SITUATED IN THE S W 1 /4 OF .SECTION FIVE, TOWNSHIP 23 N. , ' RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN;. • • • .i. 5f ii • k ' -l� kh Gt'. , I1p_ f kr. :7i'" i,: • j4 LOTTO/SEGUR • LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS LOTS 352 AND 353 , C. D. HILLMAN ' S •LAKE WASHINGTON GARDEN OF EDEN, DIVISION NO. FIVE, ACCORDING TO TLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 11 OF PLATS, PAGE 83 , IN KING COUNTY WASHINGTON; EXCEPT THAT PORTION THEREOF CONVEYED TO KING COUNTY FOR NEWPORT- RENTON ROAD BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 1036529 . ALL SITUATED IN THE S W 1 /4 OF SECTION 5 TOWNSHIP 23 N RANGE 5 E WILILAMETTE MERIDIAN. • , • • • • !,$TA' • • 11 • • . rcff ! _ . . 01. t . , 1 r N C • . UI Tf t31 ..,:-.. /if/ ,„ .. n w '\ 6/ •'t yo y- nr.:• \\ �r Q N i ,• Z w "� 2 ' _e ' �, _ N O(Nll /� • ...i�``4- �..� - - -J w .. W 1wO. 71 CC\ ,✓Ar. ----I' i,t 1. a N 6 y,rr �N\NS+ D\ A tt ..' w 1 Y •,'�' ' \ Nt+ to ` \ /t. ,:, Ot • A . 1 \ .' ,Q a • - a k • , r µ_ _ 11t.. :� - *\,• t ' ' 3a: i 4 CI • o•+ d of •t a I h ) ] •.1 p"dry JOj S, — ( .. A ..a a ' • v. LI� •"' �� ram— N r w. { w � A�/�..; L_- .%ram. - '• .-. 17 �?�`O" SR405r�.,N.,� • , ,� '.• ^f'�:aw "� Q i., S. R.405 . L G �, �`�' x I. Y.f.flf•Avf�flENfON TO KENNYDAIE ,•'�""' - I w.v."' I��/f� RENTO.N TO I, •., , �"' .. /� acr a w6e.0 1 J_ �f-`•' J./r! •y s.r. Lk05 Cr.../.N N tom"'' •��• E UE { ; af.ys `;�n..ln.a r.. .. T ! • ►.n �<< 1 �/C r SR. DN INTEAC �— • • N 4 I / .4' ..L••• 'L. ern<,tt< O, pp1H RE u�,a��f ffsiF '��'r S� e DI V - f.a ' "�.• -'•�.. 4, 1 C/.r..r i 1 __ • .Nro• f9.• ' � � • ^� `I C.";-..t'..r+•..." I _ ti�•, 'NIDN A4E N fa.,1•7 <—..d"Y nW RL%'----._•, • ryy,�l�Y } IV yot.N'f2 E .I .. 'II ...r a •yam 5\ �•G e `` ." C w• N 33g9�•• :1N I.,° I ++.Y s,,.'�.1 t f. a� i v ..... �. tO I• I I. I I • ' t',` N ��. -N—��•+i�eC e :� �. G d } W I� ' 't;ti ! i ‘\ ii e•Z: :t%.111„. : t . WHEN RECORDED RETURN 'c , . : Office of the City Clerk Contract Rezone, The Bluffs Rento:i Municipal Building / R-89-044 • 200 i`L:1 A•venue South • 1:ento 1,VJ 98055 PROPERTY USE AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT THIS INSTRUMENT is executed this date in favor of the City of Renton, a municipal corporation (the "City") , by the undersigned property owners (the "Owners") of the within described property. WITNESSET H: WHEREAS, the Owners are the owners of the property legally described On Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference (the "Property") ; and WHEREAS, the Owners' representative has filed a petition ti under File No. R; SA-044-89 for a rezone of the Property from O) O Single Family (R-1) to multifamily medium density (R-3) with site Oplan approval and subject to a contract rezone; and Q) WHEREAS, the Development Services Division has recommended approval of the petition subject to a contract rezone and site plan approval, and with conditions and mitigation established by the Environmental Review Committee; and WHEREAS, the Hearing Examiner has recommended approval of the petition subject to the terms and conditions set forth herein, and has granted site plan approval subject to conditions; and WHEREAS, the City Council has found that the proposed use and development of the Property complies with the goals and • 274PVDA.001 QQ•�G Ulu policies of the Comprehensive Plan, is in the public interest, and will not impair the public health, safety and welfare; and WHEREAS, the City Council has approved the rezone subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement, and subject to the execution and recording of this Agreement; NOW, THEREFORE, the Owners hereby covenant, bargain and agree on behalf of themselves and their ' successors ,and assigns that they will comply with the: following conditions if the Property is rezoned to multifamily medium density (R-3) or its equivalent zoning classification: Section 1. Development of the Property shall be accomplished in accordance with the following conditions: ...� A. Development of the Property shall be in accordance ti O) with the site plan approved by the Hearing Examiner's Decision (Y) and Recommendation dated January 12 , 1993 ("Hearing Examiner's Decision") . Minor modifications to the site plan that are not major adjustments may be permitted subject to the approval of. the Development Services Division. B. The Owners shall execute covenants running •with the land that establish the maximum overall project density of no more than 7. 3 condominium dwelling units: per acre; and that establish the overall project height at 50 feet as shown in the approved site plan and exhibits to the Hearing Examiner's , Decision. - 2 - 274-%10A.001 d. The Owners shall execute a covenants agreeing to establish the project as a residential condominium complex. D. The Owners shall comply with all mitigation measures established by the Environmental Review Committee Mitigation Document published on October 9, 1992 . E. The' Owners shall comply with the site plan approval conditions imposed by the Hearing Examiner in his January 12, 1993 , and February 5, 1993 Decisions. Section 2. This Agreement may be amended or modified by agreement between the Owners and the City; -provided, such amended agreement shall be approved by the legislative authority of the City by ordinance. Section 3 . It is further expressly agreed that in the event ti Q) any covenant or condition or restriction contained herein or any O . portion thereof is invalid or void, such invalidity or voidness 1c11- CLO shall in no way affect any other covenant, condition Or CD restriction contained herein. Section 4 . This Agreement and the approved site plan shall be valid for a period of five (5) years from the date hereof unless extended for an additional two (2) year period. In the event this Agreement is not amendedor modified by agreement between the Owners and the City and construction of the project has not commenced within said time period(s) , the zoning of the Property shall revert to the zoning classification that most closely reflects the land use designations for the Property as - 3 - 274-PUDA.001 • depicted, on the City's then current Land,. Use Map for the Comprehensive Plan. 15 DATED this 0 day of 1/4rneo'i - , 1993 . OWNERS: ),E4, ),412( • I (_. � .\J4 Lcl4 _./••. g 'l •' (.' . • STATE OF"WASHINGTON ) • O COUNTY OF KING • On this day personally appeared before me + s# (ookt , O to me known to be -the individual who executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that �i.t.,_ signed the instrument as free and voluntary act and deed, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned: IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set fitly hand and- seal this etl day of V .ca\ , 1993 . • • NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the • State of Washington, residing at aieft(A i,. . .. ;. MY commission expires: STATE OF WASHINGTON )• COUNTY OF KING ) • On this day personally appeared before me 'jc1A 04-{' Ke,•kat .. r to me known to be the individual who executed the within and • foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that signed the - 4 - 274•PUDA.001 instrument as Jl�t:, free and voluntary act and deed, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. } IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and seal this day of t-1A , 1993 . NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of Washington, residing at A ti ; My commission expires: y-(4-q0 STATE OF WASHINGTON ) COUNTY OF KING ) On this day personally appeared before me �1% y �;he ,rk :� , to me known to be the individual who executed the within and • foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that signed the instrument as jv,,.._ free and voluntary act and deed, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. ti IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and seal O this 4m day of g-U , 1993 . widt- O • c�J Cr) ,Lys ( Vl . ... _ NOTAR PUBLIC in and for the State of Washington, residing; at ; My commission expires: 944.1q STATE OF WASHINGTON ) COUNTY OF KING ) • On this day personally appeared before me jv .e 5e3L. , to me known to be the .individual who executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that �p,,,� . signed the instrument as A.,. „ free and voluntary act and deed, for the uses and purposes' therein mentioned. 5 - . 274-PUDA.001 • IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and ;seal this 1y$> day of (-( Q . , 1993 . - NOTARY UBLIC in and for the State of Washington, residing at ., -a ; My commission expires: K-m-qq STATE OF WASHINGTON ) . COUNTY OF KING• ) On this day. personally appeared before me 1,I4,,4y,j: 1..014.0 , • to me known .to be the individual who executed the within and foregoing, instrument, and acknowledged that y�,, signed the instrument as , ., , 1. free and voluntary act and deed, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. IN .WITNESS WHEREOF., I have hereunto set my hand and seal this .i;'E'` day of . Mo,,All , 1993 . • Cr) • mot- cr) NOTARY UBLIC in and for the . Cr.) . State of Washington, residing at �,r, eti.B� ; My commission expires:, 4..0.414 STATE OF WASHINGTON ) COUNTY OF KING ) On this day personally appeared before me 31,r,�, {_rial-f-,A.41(c to me known to be the individual who executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that signed the instrument as Q�,� free and voluntary act and deed, •for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. • - 6 - 274-PUOA.001 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and seal this 1'-'- day of A,, , , 1993 . NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of Washington, residing at l w,.d. ; My commission expires: Lq-j -otf N- Q` girt e-) Cr) - 7 - 27E-PUDA.001 • KIRKMAN LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS PARCEL A: THAT PORTION OF THE RIGHT OF WAY 200.00 FEET IN WIDTH DELINEATED ON C. D. HILLMAN'S LAKE WASHINGTON GARDEN OF EDEN DIVISION NO. FIVE, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 11 OF PLATS, PAGE 83, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, AS "C AND P. S. R. R. " LYING BETWEEN THE WESTERLY PRODUCTION OF THE NORTH LINE OF LOT 322 OF SAID PLAT AND THE WESTERLY PRODUCTION OF THE SOUTH LINE OF LOT 317 OF SAID PLAT, AND LYING WESTERLY OF STATE HIGHWAY 405. EXCEPT THAT PORTION LYING BETWEEN THE EASTERLY PRODUCTION OF THE NORTH LINE OF LOT 350 OF SAID PLAT AND THE WESTERLY PRODUCTION OF THE SOUTH LINE OF LOT 317 OF SAID PLAT; EXCEPT THAT PORTION LYING BETWEEN THE WESTERLY PRODUCTION OF THE NORTH LINE OF LOT 322 OF SAID PLAT AND THE WESTERLY PRODUCTION OF THE SOUTH LINE OF LOT 319 OF SAID PLAT; t` PARCEL B: O ' C) THAT PORTION OF LOT 319, C. D. HILLMAN'S LAKE WASHINGTON GARDEN .ct OF EDEN DIVISION NO. FIVE, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 'li OF PLATS, PAGE 83, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, LYING 7) WESTERLY OF STATE HIGHWAY NO. 405, AND THAT PORTION OF PACIFIC COAST RAILROAD RIGHT OF WAY LYING ADJACENT THERETO WEST OF STATE HIGHWAY NO. 405; PARCEL C: THAT PORTION OF LOT 320, C. D. HILLMAN'S LAKE WASHINGTON GARDEN OF EDEN DIVISION NO. FIVE, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 11 OF PLATS, PAGE 83, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, LYING WESTERLY OF STATE HIGHWAY NO. 405, AND THAT PORTION OF PACIFIC ' COAST RAILROAD RIGHT OF WAY LYING ADJACENT THERETO WEST OF STATE HIGHWAY NO. 405; PARCEL D: THAT PORTION OF LOTS 321 AND 322, C. D. HILLMAN'S LAKE WASHINGTON GARDEN OF EDEN DIVISION NO. FIVE, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 11 OF PLATS, PAGE 83, IN KING COUNTY, WASHING- TON, LYING WESTERLY OF STATE .HIGHWAY NO. 405, AND THAT PORTION OF PACIFIC COAST RAILROAD RIGHT OF WAY, LYING ADJACENT THERETO WEST OF STATE HIGHWAY NO. 405; PARCEL E: LOT 348 OF C. D. HILLMAN'S LAKE WASHINGTON GARDEN OF EDEN DIVI- SION NO. FIVE, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 11 OF PLATS, PAGE 83, IN KING COUNTY WASHINGTON; PARCEL F: LOT 351 , C. D. HILLMAN'S LAKE WASHINGTON GARDEN OF EDEN, DIVISION NO. FIVE, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 11 OF PLATS, PAGE 83, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; EXCEPT THE WESTERLY 60 FEET THEREOF CONDEMNED IN KING COUNTY LOTTO/SEGUR LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS LOTS 352 AND 353, C. D. HILLMAN'S LAKE WASHINGTON GARDEN OF EDEN, DIVISION NO. FIVE, ACCORDING TO PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 11 OF PLATS, PAGE 83, IN KING COUNTY WASHINGTON;. EXCEPT THAT PORTION THEREOF CONVEYED TO KING COUNTY FOR NEWPORT- RENTON ROAD BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 1036529. • ALL SITUATED IN THE S W 1/4 OF SECTION 5 TOWNSHIP 23 N RANGE 5 E WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN. ti Cr) CY) Cr) MATSUOKA LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS LOT 344, C. D. HILLMAN'S LAKE WASHINGTON GARDEN OF EDEN, DIVISION NO. FIVE, ACCORDING TO PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN VOLUME 11 OF PLATS, PAGE 83, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, AS ADJUSTED BY A BOUNDARY LINE AGREEMENT (RECORDING•NUMBER 8506240829) AND DEPICTED ON KING COUNTY SURVEY, RECORDING NUMBER 8506249011 , IN VOLUME 45, PAGE 111 , RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF VACATED 104TH AVENUE SOUTHEAST (LAKEVIEW BOULEVARD) VACATED BY THE CITY OF RENTON UNDER ORDI— NANCE NUMBER 4029. ALL SITUATED IN THE S W 1/4 OF SECTION FIVE, TOWNSHIP 23 N. , RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN. ti CT) O mod— CD 0—) COOKE • LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS PARCEL A: LOT 334, C. D. HILLMAN'S LAKE WASHINGTON GARDEN OF EDEN DIVISION NO. FIVE, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 11 OF PLATS, PAGE 83, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; EXCEPT THAT PORTION THEREOF LYING EASTERLY OF THE WESTERLY MARGIN OF PRIMARY STATE HIGHWAY NO. 1 (SR 405) AS ESTABLISHED BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 4683135. PARCEL B: LOT 335, C. D. HILLMAN'S LAKE WASHINGTON GARDEN OF EDEN DIVISION NO. FIVE, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 11 OF PLATS, PAGE 83, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; EXCEPT THAT PORTION THEREOF LYING EASTERLY OF THE WESTERLY MARGIN OF PRIMARY STATE HIGHWAY NO. 1 (SR 405) AS ESTABLISHED BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 4682225; TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF THE PACIFIC COAST RAILROAD 'COMPA- NY'S NEWCASTLE BRANCH RIGHT OF WAY, BEING A STRIP OF SAID RIGHT OF WAY 200 FEET IN WIDTH, 100 FEET OF SUCH WIDTH LYING ON EITHER O SIDE OF THE CENTERLINE OF SAID RIGHT OF WAY, AS THE SAME WAS LOCATED ON OCTOBER 15, 1946 AND BOUNDED ON THE NORTH BY THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF LOT 333, C. D. HILLMAN'S LAKE WASHINGTON GARDEN Q OF EDEN DIVISION NO. FIVE, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED CT) IN VOLUME 11 OF PLATS, PAGE 83, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, PRODUCED WESTERLY OVER AND ACROSS SAID RIGHT OF WAY, AND ON THE SOUTH BY THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF LOT 336 OF SAID PLAT, PRODUCED WESTERLY OVER AND ACROSS SAID RIGHT OF WAY; EXCEPT THAT PORTION THEREOF LYING EASTERLY OF THE WESTERLY MARGIN OF PRIMARY STATE HIGHWAY NO. 1 (SR 405) AS ESTABLISHED BY DEED RECORDED UNDER .RECORDING NUMBER 4648616. PARCEL, C: THAT PORTION OF THE PACIFIC COAST RAILROAD COMPANY'S RIGHT OF WAY IN SECTION 5, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERID- IAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, LYING BETWEEN THE NORTH AND SOUTH MARGINS OF THIRD AVENUE, EXTENDED TO THE WEST, AS DEFINED ON C. D. HILLMAN'S LAKE WASHINGTON GARDEN OF EDEN DIVISION NO. FIVE, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 11 OF PLATS, PAGE 83, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, AND LYING WESTERLY OF A LINE DRAWN PARALLEL WITH AND 180 FEET WESTERLY, WHEN MEASURED RADIALLY, FROM THE LINE OF SURVEY OF SR 405, RENTON TO KENNYDALE. THE AFOREMENTIONED PROPERTIES ARE SITUATED IN THE N W 1/4 AND S W 1/4 OF SECTION FIVE TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN. • • • BRANCH RIGHT OF WAY, BEING A STRIP OF LAND 200 FEET IN WIDTH, 100 FEET OF SUCH WIDTH LYING ON EITHER SIDE OF THE RIGHT OF WAY CENTERLINE, AS THE SAME IS NOW ESTABLISHED OVER AND ACROSS THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 5, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, AND BEING BOUNDED ON THE SOUTH' BY THE SOUTH LINE OF • LOT 323, C. D. ,HILLMAN'S LAKE WASHINGTON GARDEN OF EDEN ADDITION • TO SEATTLE DIVISION- NO. 5, ACCORDING TO- THE PLAT THEREOF, RECORD- • ED IN VOLUME 11 OF PLATS, PAGE -83, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, PRODUCED WESTERLY OVER AND ACROSS SAID RIGHT OF WAY AND 'ON THE NORTH BY- THE NORTH LINE OF LOT 325, SAID PLAT PRODUCED WEST OVER • AND-ACROSS. SAID RIGHT OF WAY; EXCEPT THAT PORTION THEREOF CONVEYED TO THE STATE OF WASHINGTON BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 4648616. • ALL SITUATED IN THE S W' 1/4 OF SECTION FIVE TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN. ' • ti C O Cr) ' Cr) r- MARTINDALE LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS PARCEL A: LOT 349, C. D. HILLMAN'S LAKE WASHINGTON GARDEN OF EDEN DIVISION NO. FIVE, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN VOLUME 11 OF PLATS, PAGE 83, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF VACATED 104TH AVENUE SOUTHEAST (LAKEVIEW BOULEVARD) , VACATED BY THE CITY OF RENTON UNDER ORDI- NANCE NUMBER 2958; • SERVED BY AN EASEMENT FOR INGRESS AND EGRESS OVER THE SOUTH 50 FEET OF LOT 351 OF SAID PLAT. PARCEL B: LOT 350, C. D. HILLMAN'S LAKE WASHINGTON GARDEN OF EDEN DIVISION NO. FIVE, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 11 OF PLATS, PAGE 83, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; EXCEPT THE WESTERLY 60 FEET THEREOF CONDEMNED IN KING COUNTY QSUPE.RIOR COURT CASE NUMBER 11581 FOR RENTON NEWPORT ROAD; CD TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF VACATED 104TH AVENUE SOUTHEAST O (LAKEVIEW BOULEVARD) VACATED BY THE CITY OF RENTON UNDER ORDI- ('--) NANCE NUMBER 2958; 0) TOGETHER WITH AN EASEMENT FOR INGRESS AND EGRESS OVER THE SOUTH 50 FEET OF LOT 351 OF SAID PLAT. • PARCEL C: LOTS 345 AND 346, C. D. HILLMAN'S LAKE WASHINGTON GARDEN OF EDEN DIVISION NO. FIVE, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 11 OF PLATS, PAGE 83, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; AS ADJUSTED BY BOUNDARY LINE AGREEMENT' (RECORDING NUMBER 8506240829) AND DEPICTED ON KING COUNTY SURVEY, RECORDING NUMBER 8506249011 , IN VOLUME 45, PAGE 111 , RECORDS OF KING COUNTY WASHINGTON. TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF VACATED 104TH AVENUE SOUTHEAST (LAKEVIEW BOULEVARD) VACATED BY THE CITY OF RENTON UNDER ORDI- NANCE NUMBER 4029. PARCEL D: THAT PORTION OF THE RIGHT OF WAY 200.00 FEET IN. WIDTH DELINEATED ON C. D. . HILLMAN'S LAKE WASHINGTON GARDEN OF EDEN DIVISION NO. FIVE, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 11 OF PLATS, PAGE 83, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, AS "C AND P. S. R. R. " LY.ING BETWEEN THE EASTERLY PRODUCTION OF THE NORTH LINE OF LOT 350 OF SAID PLAT AND THE WESTERLY PRODUCTION OF THE SOUTH LINE OF LOT 317 OF SAID PLAT; EXCEPT THAT PORTION THEREOF CONVEYED TO THE STATE OF WASHINGTON FOR HIGHWAY PURPOSES BY DEEDS RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBERS 4668942 AND 6014374 . PARCEL E: THAT PORTION OF THE PACIFIC COAST RAILROAD COMPANY'S NEWCASTLE • SUPERIOR COURT CAUSE NUMBER 115311 FOR RENTON-NEWPORT ROAD; SUBJECT TO AN EASEMENT FOR INGRESS AND EGRESS OVER THE SOUTH 50 FEET THEREOF. ALL SITUATED IN THE S W 1/4 OF SECTION FIVE TOWNSHIP 23 N RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN. ti O) M EO 0 0) -•- - _v_. t•--.-•,••-::.•;`4rip-K -.+ ._----) - - t+•tttNN t;tcoRorn Ft1URN TO: Cont:raec Rezone. The Bluffs �, O;.`ferf o:Gh Col. R.gg.p.4 ( !.1.0g,.i I.t•Min.;.1{ .1.:.: ti:,t, PROPERTY USE AND DEVELOPMENS AGREEMENT • THIS INSTRUMENT is executed this date in favor of the City r . of Renton, a municipal corporation (the "City") , by the ' undersigned property owners (the "Owners") of the within described property. i • WITNESSETh: WHEREAS, the Owners are the owners of the property legally , described on Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein, by this reference (the "Property") ; and �r WHEREAS, the Owners' representative has filed a petition - �' "ra.-; under File Ho. R; SA-044-89 for a rezone of the Property from -• • - Q. ) . .. C 3 Single Family (R-1) to multifamily medium density (R-3) with site i Cr] Aplan approval and subject to a contract rezone; and :! WHEREAS, the Development Services Division has recommended 07 F` r.• 1 +: -I approval of the petition subject to a contract rezone and site -s plan approval, and with conditions and mitigation established byi _• the Environmental Review Committee; and WHEREAS, the ;searing Examiner has recommended approval of j 1 the petition subject to the terms and conditions set forth i -herein, and has granted site plan approval subject to conditions; '•. and . y . i - • WHEREAS, the City Council has found that the proposed use . and development o the Property complies with the •goals and z.:i ::• - - • - - r T? :r• Yij _-- ^, 61L1S0SQti973`J:•:::::::::::V.C11•1:1•:::•:::::;:70411:rlf'::'" (!{{: 714,40-WI • Q�1. I,« E M. uL ��''• ..+:- _ a..•.:-?.r.o.f..`s•._ ....._�.�3:15r.::f.':..._::"_�•, � 'r. • �'e'i:.' r..F..Ylc�1;.n:,+�tj�' ^.!•.. -:;. .. _ - tiwnoi os - s•�— 11t-i.r z.� — er —��i.if , • • policies of the Comprehensive Plan, is in the public interest, and will not impair the public health, safety and welfare; and WHEREAS, the City Council has approved the'rezone subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement, and subject to the execution and recording of this Agreement;. NOW, THEREFORE, the owners hereby covenant, bargain and agree on behalf of themselves and their successors and assigns s f that they will comply with the following conditions if the Property is rezoned to multifamily medium density (R-3) or its equivalent zoning. classification: Section 1. Development of the Property shall be accomplished in accordance with.thefollowing conditions: . -- - A. Development of the Property shall be in accordance ti Owith the site plan approved by the Hearing Examiner's Decision M and Recommendation dated January 12, 1993 ("Hearing Examiner's 'td- Decision"). Minor modifications to the site plan .that are not Q: "major adjustments may be permitted subject to the approval of the Development Services Division. B. The Owners shall execute covenants running with the land that establish the maximum overall project density of no more than 7.3 condominium dwelling units per acre; and that establish the overall project height at 50 feet as shown in the approved site plan and exhibits to the Hearing Examiner's Decision. ....... .-,` �;':.y ,� ,' i•�`tv' — . .. v' .i,x:a 1.- • • r. — I WflO1 • .t 6 flH1 2_6 — St W • a • C. The Owners shall execute a covenants agreeing to establish the project as a residential condominium complex. D. The owners shall comply with all. mitigation measures established by the Environmental Review Committee • Mitigation Document published •on October 9, 1992. • • E. The Owners shall comply with'the site plan approval conditions imposed by the Hearing Examiner in his January 12, 1993, and February 5, 1993 Decisions. Section 2. This Agreement maybe amended or modified by • • agreement between the owners and the City; provided, such amended 11 agreement shall be approved by the legislative authority of the i - City by ordinance. , Section 3: it'I's''fiirther expressly agreed that in the event any covenant or condition or restriction contained herein or any Cr) • portion thereof is invalid or void, such invalidity or voidness It +'ct- Oshall in no way affect ,any other covenant, condition Or restriction contained herein. Section 4. This Agreement and the approved site. plan shall • be valid' for a period of five (5) years from the date hereof unless extended for an-additional two (2) year period. In the • • event this Agreement is not amended or modified by agreement between the Owners And the City and construction of the project • ' has not commenced within said time period(s) , the zoning of the Property shall rave.;t to, the•_zoning cias4ficatiori that most ..• -_ •F:: .- 'closely reflects the land use designations for the Property as • 3 • tT�........ _- .• ,. ,..-. .�. . _: ... t�•� 1.. _'. .:.t rd.�_rtt..••��.r2:r'�B _ fiWf101 -ZS = 6 f1HI_ 2_6 — ST tite . . , . . . . , ..• . . P .1.... ! PP.!. . . • ' • - • i... , . . • . • 7 ,111 I • el 1 • . .1 - i 1 ! depicted on the City's then current Land Use Map for the . - . a 1 . I 1. Comprehensive Plan. br5 . . DATED this 0 - day of Al1yw4e. , 1993. • , .... OWNERS: mi . • t . . \ ,,.• - .--' .•t iti '. .?1.ifill./14,t 1'1 f es----.. .- (• • --..,' c ...:4.4.f .)../ ....:dre1../..,•-•--,..$.1 - - g . ,..p. , •- - . •--- ...:--- or . p.,..- -::. STATE oF WASHINGTON ) ' '-: .cn .. • . . i ' . - 'St , CD tyl COUNTY OF KING ) . ...ct• On this day personally appeared before mallzmAtti /lA4. , : (:) to me known to be the individual who executed thLwithin and • CT) foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that signed the I ... . instrument as j..,:,, free and voluntary act and deed, for the .... .. uses and purposes therein mentioned. -! IN WITNESS WHEII0F, I have hereunto set my hand and seal this eb day of glik(tt\ , 1993. • -'• : • • • . . ; • . . 1 . ; • . . NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the • . . State of Washington, residing ,• • at AfOt.N..4 -. . . • .: commission expires: . 1,41-44 . .. . . .- ... . % STATE OF WASHINGTON ) . . . .• . . . . , . ) • . -- ... . .. - . '." ,:' ...:': - '•''/-1.:•....•'...15:(1fgOV14.1.Y.:.011 KING '''. • • ) : s•-:•••••••••:;-:.:.,.•::.,:.*:•.: 1':; .• .-ii••;•-1.,•::::.;.•••'1,.:".•:';f,:-!..::.::1:;..:•. ::•:‘-pit:•:•.:1;;,!iri. ... _ - On this day personally appeared before me 145(^1.1Aktstu.skik ,to me known to be the individual who executed the within and . : • . : foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that jki _ signed the 4, . i . • . . . : . . - . • • - . . . . . . . . .... . . . • — • "i; -•-• • . - .17.044.00 • • •' ... : :..".•':-,:l;'..-...,'• :•%'.s...! ::. -1 • . ;-7: ....••••••: f:. •,.. •• • • ,'•: • .:: . • i • 4 1.,_. . • .. • S . • • . • • •• ...• ., . . . ... .y: .,_,...,.. ..., ..17.4-_•f-1.-...•... • i:,-t.f."s.-.----;'.,!1 - •;..L.. : 1•...I.-..M..-I AN..IM;.I.,:._,.,..-,..N4-I.M.?I:..I.:ii. ....7......1....i...'.: .•'.,:'•t..i. 7 ..2-•- . -L ...' - .;'-;' .-;1.:::1'7,,-..?;:•::':.-:-.-1..)1?1"..:..:E.1..-; 6A ;- MOK — _ wnci .0,;•.•1•7-0.....:;._1",,:,"..4..--;f;e',''Y''''‘.71.?1•:1.zs : e. II I-1 J_ Z- E. - T - A e W i . sa h,u:T,_: instrument as .L? free and voluntary act and deed, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and seal __ = this Re` day of 11,1 1„, , 199). `'. . "-' .,...,.._.-- i Aka I% -�3 NOTARY PUBLIC n and for the . State of Washington, residing 'r at4� My commission expires: 1444v - 2 a STATE OF WASHINGTON ) f.,.. COUNTY OF KING ) T- On this day personally appeared before me .1`t,,J;,,e (}Ark,,A ,• to me known to be the individual who executed the within and • foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that e. , signed the ===j r instrument as Gur free and voluntary act and deed, for the ._ uses and purposes therein mentioned. _ • . , - .jT 1 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, i have hereunto-set My Shand and seal p this q.t day of . Ku kk . , 1993. c • NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of Washington, residing _-' at itlYtt,7•, o r., : My commission expires: 4'li't4 - v` y` - STATE OF WASHINGTON ) COUNTY OF XING ) . • On this day personally appeared before me jp (f Sell.•- ., to me known to be the individual' who executed the grithin and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that ,L).A., signed the instrument as L,•k. free and voluntary act and deed, for the 1 • - uses and purposes therein mentioned. • • • '{. • - 5 - 110.4,MI • Sri ft • 4. ri:.7Cr3:6i_f.•,i_..�....-.. .....� ._... r 4. W t e.'•''• :• :'i •', _ _ flHLG - si - .A Izi W 1 I I IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and seal this te› day of rlrt„1A , 1993. ; • - NOTARY PUBLIC kn and for the . State of Washington, residing • i at j }inadti-J, ; My . commission expires: Y•rt•9H STATE OF WASHINGTON ) 1 ) I r . COUNTY OF XING ) On this day personally appeared before me J , to me known to be the individual who executed the w h n and ! ._ foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that signed the • ( instrument as ' .e...,.L free and voluntary act an deed, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. ! IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and seal f — this 1'54=, day of Me.,A, , 1993. CD ! M n NOTARY UBLIC in and for the CP. • State of Washington, residing ' at ar tC, A ; My commission expires; 4.44 • STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) S iCOUNTY OF KING ) • 1 On this day personally appeared before me f w.iutf t"lctrt.ac�a kt to. me known to be the individual who executed thqwithin an 1 • foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that ..+ signed the e instrument as -9,.,;, free and voluntary act and deed, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. • E. ,, • i'*.e,. •:•' I.- .•.f ¢ 'mot...; ., .. , .-•,� .. �:`;,r:>>� • ;'��`..•1r:1u1; Ft� • �.�,•• _ � .. . . l: 1 - - - 6 - . $,.n.p4 oe, t, J. ♦,� yam. a , ... ,... . •..A<..1 y. . .{,r- J:,10 ,I _._ =-w� - _ = 01 SS = 6 f1H1 Z6 - ST - J. tiW C,Gj�r _....K.J.�.�'..ar.'..1.� -. 1✓.�'- _..... .• A 11111111,I ■1.11 1 1 • • , w • • • IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and seal this 1 day of 1993. NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of Washington, residing at ; My commission expires: L . ' Lf • i . . • . � 4r • Cr.; • • Co Cr; • _ a... ..`,. :'_ '�;t•:•r�. i.�. :Y: .:r,. i: :i • I .ti '1� -t.l _ 1..• • ,1%1,.n... ... � ''v;' L.,.•t•rt 4 . . �k. Sv... .. :'+.�. :•!L{•�'�u•,1. .. 1. awnoi s e G fl LE — S I -- A H PROPERTY USE AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT THIS INSTRUMENT is executed this date in favor of the City of Renton, a municipal corporation(the"City"), by the undersigned property owners(the"Owners") of the within described property. WITNESSETH: WHEREAS,the Owners are the owners of the property legally described on Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference(the"Property"); and WHEREAS.the Owners obtained approval in 1993 for a rezone of the Property and Site Plan Approval for the development, subject to a Property Use and Development Agreement recorded at auditor's file no. 9304130971,.records of King Coma., Washington(the"Development Agreement"); WHEREAS,the Owners' representative has filed a request-petitien under File No. R;SA 044 89 to modify the Site Plan Approval and amend theDevelopment Agreement for the Pro a ft>, rt Single F'amil ( T)to multif mily .p._rt�/ r � a � ` , I141L.141. ••``JJ ; and WHEREAS,the Development Services Division has recommended approval of • the amendment of the Development Agreement ne-and R s e ,Co i++m; and WHEREAS,the Hearing Examiner has onditions set-ferth-herein;-and-has-granted a modification to the site plan approval subject to conditions, and NPUCIODATALLEGACATHE BLUFFS S1TEPLANAMENDIREVISEDPUOA.DOC 1 , WHEREAS, the City Council has found that the proposed site plan modification and amendment to the Development Agreementuse and-development-e€the complies with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan, is in the public interest, and will not impair the public health, safety and welfare;,and xx ERE A Q t1, Cit n i h ,.proved the re.o e s b; ct to ti, ♦ rm nd :av.,� aaan -resew-this Agreement; NOW, THEREFORE,the Owners hereby covenant, bargain and agree on behalf of themselves and their successors and assigns that they will comply with the following conditions if the site plan modification and amendment to the Development Agreement • for the Property is approved. The provisions of this ordinance shall replace and supersede the provisions of Ordinance No. . which originally approved the site plan • and Development Agreement for the Property. Section 1. Development of the Property shall be accomplished in accordance with the following conditions: ' A. Development of the Property shall be in accordance with the site • plan approved by the Hearing Examiner's Decision and Recommendation dated January 12, 1993 ("Hearing Examiner's Decision"),as modified bythe site,plan modification approved by,the Hearing Examiner on 1998. Minor modifications to the site plan that are not major adjustments may be permitted subject to the approval of the Development Services Division. APUCKIDATA LEGACV1THE BLUFFSWITEPLANAMEND%REVISEDPUDA.DOC2 B. The Owners shall execute covenants running with the land that establish the maximum overall project density of no more than 7.93-condominium • dwelling units per acr ; D:C. The Owners shall comply with all mitigation measures • established by the Environmental Review Committee Mitigation Document published on October 9, 1992, as amended and supplemented by the Addendum Decision on November 3. 1998. &D. The Owners shall comply with the site plan approval conditions imposed by the Hearing Examiner in his January 12, 1993, and-February 5, 1993, and December , 1998 Decisions. Section 2. This Agreement may be amended or modified by agreement between the Owners and the City; provided, such amended agreement shall be approved by the legislative authority of the City by ordinance. Section 3. It is further expressly agreed that in the event any covenant or condition or restriction contained herein or any portion thereof is invalid or void, such invalidity or voidness shall in no way affect any other covenant, condition or restriction contained herein. - Section 4. This Agreement and the approved site plan shall be valid for a period of five(5)years from the date hereof unless extended for an additional two (2) year period. In the event this Agreement is not amended or modified by agreement %PUCKIDATAILEGACYITHE BLUFFS\SITEPLANAMENDIREVISEDPUDA.DOC3 t � between the Owners and the City and construction of the project has not commenced within said time period(s), the zoning of the Property shall revert to the zoning classifications that most closely reflects the land use designations for the Property as depicted on the City's then current Land Use map for the Comprehensive Plan. DATED this day of , 19939. J \\PUCK\DATA\LEGACY\THE BLUFFSISITEPLANAMEND\REVISEDPUDA.D0C4 CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL AI #: SUBMITTING DATA: FOR AGENDA OF: Dept/Div/Board. . HEARING EXAMINER Staff Contact. . FRED J. KAUFMAN AGENDA STATUS: Consent XX SUBJECT: THE BLUFFS Public Hearing. . R;SA-044-89 Correspondence. . Between Lk. WA. BLVD N & I-405, Ordinance XX east of Coulon Park Resolution Old Business. . . . EXHIBITS: Hearing Examiner's Report New Business. . . . Request for Recons/Response Study Session. . . L. Warren Memo of 3-18-93 Information. . . . Property Use Agreement RECOMMENDED ACTION: Council Concur and I APPROVALS: Place Ordinance on First Reading 1 Legal Dept 1 Finance Dept. . . . 1 Other FISCAL IMPACT: N/A Expenditure Required. . . Transfer/Amendment. . Amount Budgeted Revenue Generated. . . SUMMARY OF ACTION: The recommendation of the Hearing Examiner for approval of the referenced Contract Rezone and Site Approval was published January 12, 1993. A request for reconsideration was received January 26, 1993, to which the Examiner responded on February 5, 1993. No appeals were received during the extended appeal period which ended February 19, 1993. In his recommendation, the Examiner imposed restrictive covenants. In a memo dated March 18, 1993, (copy attached) City Attorney Larry Warren stated that since The Bluffs project was a Contract Rezone which contained promises to file applicable covenants, the matter could go before Council without containing the executed covenants. The project consists of six residential condominium buildings containing 165 dwelling units, a recreation center, and parking. The Property Use and Development Agreement binds the applicant to construct the project according to the Site Plan Approval and its conditions. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approval with conditions. \ C ITY ~ .F= ,EN'T:ON' 'Office Hof.the City Attorney-, ' Earl Clymer,,-Mayor ; • Lawrence:J:-Warren • 1„ h, ,NII_�MORANDUM' DEVE►e`PMENT'PLANNI'NG' - To: Don Erickson Princi' al'Planner •' • • p' Fromi ;Lawrence J::'Warren,,,City Attorney,: ,.Staff'Contac`ti: Paul'Forsarider, Date: March 8,; 1993• , ' { ' Bluff•Contract Rezone' • " - _ - , Subjects , - s : - �' �, In reviewing thedraft,IliaVe the-following comments:' • . 'On:page' 2,, Section•1�,""item•B third`line•from the 'bottoms is a phrase"overall' project ' • . - - height:'': I believe'that.there needs to be,a reference-to indicate that thisRis buildingheight:. " - .' On:page 3, .item,C;: first. line, either ,the`,word "a'' .needs;to be•:'eliminated f'or;the:word •= ' ".covenants" needs to:he madesingular: On page43; Section'2,:there has been proposed additional,•language to be'inserted at the end of that'section whicli.states'"after following''any'established procedure the city has'for' handling such 'amendments or modifications." I agree that proposed�addition needs .to'be'mad'e,' .,,' In Section° ;'on page ntafterrtheword,"extended"::there.has:been sugges ' addition H Additionally,,.ah end- aonf. - that line:there is a-"suggestion,that•the.;words,:="based:upon a showing:of:need, and past achievement in,satisfyingl.tl a`provisions of this'agreement". be'added..Again;`I,"agree. Finally, in':that,same'section;.thi'rd`.line from.the''bottom the`:word "co"mmenced"_ has been''"_' ' stricken rana two:words;proposed which=I believe are ':'substantially:underway:".'.:Again;.I - ' , Vould'agree with the:'additions-- - , The draft-that I have does-not'contain a,legal:description: We need:.to,make'sure:that one is • ,attached- :, If -Can provide you,with•any further information,please;let-nie know..' . `• 'Lawrence J:'W ;ten:- " cc: _ Mayor Earl"Clymer _ •A.8`:95,":10: , , • Post'Office Box.626'-100 S 2nd-.Street->Renton;.Washington'9'8.057: (206)255--8678; 0 ; 1 CITY ',.F RENTON `` 9 Planning/Building/Public Works Department Earl Clymer, Mayor Lynn Guttmann,Administrator March 2, 1993 Mr. Donald S. Bateman Broker 1266 North Bend Boulevard N. North Bend, WA 98045 SUBJECT: The Bluffs Legal Descriptions, File No. R-044-89, SA, ECF Dear Mr. Bateman: Sonja Fesser, Property.Management, has reviewed the latest submitted legal descriptions for The Bluffs and has sent me a memorandum with her comments. I have summarized the comments in this letter. The following items need to be addressed before the rezone can be scheduled for the Council's agenda:. General Comments: It would be desirable to have all the legals retyped so that they look uniform. In their present form,the legals have a variety of formats and styles, since they have been taken from other recorded instruments or other documents. Some descriptions are quite abbreviated and some are not. The way in which the properties are described should be consistent. The Segur legal description: The description in generally acceptable, but needs to be typed again. The legal made no mention of acquiring vacated street right-of-way (if the street has been vacated). The Matsuoka legal description: The legal makes no mention of the boundary line agreement (Rec. No. 8506240829) which we believe is important to properly describe the property. Also, the description makes no mention of the vacated street property which now clearly belongs to Matsuoka (Vac. Ord. 4029). The Cooke legal description: No name was provided to identify this as the Cooke property. The Cooke property is in both the NW 1/4 and SW 1/4 of Sec. 5-23-5. Tax Lot numbers 0260, 0270 and 047-are now a part'of Tax Lot . number 039. Reference to these old numbers should be removed from the legal. The Martindale legal description: The legal for Tracts 345 and 346 makes no reference to the boundary line agreement (Rec. No. 8506240829) or to the vacated street adjacent to the Tracts (Vac. Ord. 4029). Did'Tracts 349 and 350 acquire the vacated street lying between them? If so, the legal should state it (Vac Ord. 2958). In our last meeting, you stated that Kirkman acquired Tax Lot No. 72, but the property is still listed under Martindale. 'One large parcel still not included in the legals given is for Tax Lot No. 034,-which belongs to Martindale. Is it not to be included in the project? Also note that the legal provided for,review has two errors in it - the division number of the plat is missing (Div. No. 5) and the description for Tax Lot 72 should say "BTW South LN Tract 317" instead of "BTW N. LN Tract 317". The Kirkman legal description: In our last meeting, you stated that Tract 351 was given to Martindale, but it is still listed as Kirkman property. The legal lists 1/2-of the adjacent road right-of -way wherever they adjoin the Kirkman parcels as property belonging to Kirkman. This still needs to be investigated - the vacation process may still be a requirement before the road can be acquired by adjoining property owners. If you have any questions about these comments please call Sonja Fesser at 277-4412 or myself at 277-6167. We hope to receive the corrected legals as soon as possible, so the rezone can be sent to council. Sincerely, /9(/2. Paul D. Forsander Project Manager cc: Sonja Fesser 1 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 w CITY OF RENTON MEMORANDUM DATE: March 2, 1993 TO: Paul D. Forsander FROM: Sonja J. Fesser SUBJECT: Review of Legal Descriptions for The Bluffs, File No. R-044-89, SA, ECF I have reviewed the latest submitted legal descriptions for The Bluffs and have the following comments: A general comment is that all the legals should be retyped so that they look uniform. At this time, the legals all come from other recorded instruments or other documents. Some descriptions are quite abbreviated and some are not. The way in which the properties are described should be consistent. The Segur legal description: Okay, but needs to be typed again. I noticed that this legal made no mention of acquiring vacated street right-of-way (if the street has been vacated). The Matsuoka legal description: The legal makes no mention of the boundary line agreement (Rec. No. 8506240829) which I feel is important to properly describe the property. I did mention this to Mr. Bateman, but I feel he didn't listen to me. Also, the description makes no mention of the vacated street property which now clearly belongs to Matsuoka (Vac. Ord. 4029). The Cooke legal description: No name was provided to identify this as the Cooke property. The Cooke property is in both the NW 1/4 and SW 1/4 of Sec. 5-23-5. Tax Lot numbers 0260, 0270 and 047 are now a part of Tax Lot number 039. Reference to these old numbers should be removed from the legal. The Martindale legal description: The legal for Tracts 345 and 346 make no reference to the boundary line agreement (Rec. No. 8506240829) or to the vacated street adjacent to the Tracts (Vac. Ord. 4029). Did Tracts 349 and 350 acquire the vacated street lying between them? If so, the legal should state it (Vac Ord. 2958). Mr. Bateman stated that Kirkland acquired Tax Lot No. 72, but the property is still listed under Martindale. One large parcel still not included in the legals given is for Tax Lot No. 034, which belongs to Martindale. Is it not to be included in the project? Also note that the legal provided for review has two errors in it - the division number of Title March 2, 1993 Page 2 the plat is missing (Div. No. 5) and the description for Tax Lot 72 should say "BTW South LN Tract 317" instead of"BTW N. LN Tract 317". The Kirkman legal description: Mr. Bateman stated that Tract 351 was given to Martindale, but it is still listed as Kirkman property. The legal lists 1/2 of the adjacent road right-of-way wherever they adjoin the Kirkman parcels as property belonging to Kirkman. This still needs to be investigated - the vacation process may still be a requirement before the road can be acquired by adjoining property owners. • 4$ CITY _ F RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works Department Earl Clymer, Mayor Lynn Guttmann,Administrator March 2, 1993 Mr. Donald S. Bateman Broker 1266 North Bend Boulevard N. North Bend, WA 98045 SUBJECT: The Bluffs Legal Descriptions, File No. R-044-89, SA, ECF Dear Mr. Bateman: Sonja Fesser, Property Management, has reviewed the latest submitted legal descriptions for The Bluffs and has sent me a memorandum with her comments. I have summarized the comments in this letter. The following items need to be addressed before the rezone can be scheduled for the Council's agenda: General Comments: It would be desirable to have all the legals retyped so that they look uniform. In their present form, the legals have a variety of formats and styles, since they have been taken from other recorded instruments or other documents. Some descriptions are quite abbreviated and some are not. The way in which the properties are described should be consistent. The Segur legal description: The description in generally acceptable, but needs to be typed again. The legal made no mention of acquiring vacated street right-of-way (if the street has been vacated). The Matsuoka legal description: The legal makes no mention of the boundary line agreement (Rec. No. 8506240829) which we believe is important to properly describe the property. Also, the description makes no mention of the vacated street property which now clearly belongs to Matsuoka (Vac. Ord. 4029). The Cooke legal description: No name was provided to identify this as the Cooke property. The Cooke property is in both the NW 1/4 and SW 1/4 of Sec. 5-23-5. Tax Lot numbers 0260, 0270 and 047 are now a part of Tax Lot number 039. Reference to these old numbers should be removed from the legal. The Martindale legal description: The legal for Tracts 345 and 346 makes no reference to the boundary line agreement (Rec. No. 8506240829) or to the vacated street adjacent to the Tracts (Vac. Ord. 4029). Did Tracts 349 and 350 acquire the vacated street lying between them? If so, the legal should state it (Vac Ord. 2958). In our last meeting, you stated that Kirkman acquired Tax Lot No. 72, but the property is still listed under Martindale. One large parcel still not included in the legals given is for Tax Lot No. 034, which belongs to Martindale. Is it not to be included in the project? Also note that the legal provided for review has two errors in it - the division number of the plat is missing (Div. No. 5) and the description for Tax Lot 72 should say "BTW South LN Tract 317" instead of "BTW N. LN Tract 317". The Kirkman legal description: In our last meeting, you stated that Tract 351 was given to Martindale, but it is still listed as Kirkman property. The legal lists 1/2 of the adjacent road right-of -way wherever they adjoin the Kirkman parcels as property belonging to Kirkman. This still needs to be investigated - the vacation process may still be a requirement before the road can be acquired by adjoining property owners. If you have any questions about these comments please call Sonja Fesser at 277-4412 or myself at 277-6167. We hope to receive the corrected legals as soon as possible, so the rezone can be sent to council. Sincerely, /9/ Paul D. Forsander Project Manager cc: Sonja Fesser 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 THIS Ps PER CONTAINS 50%RECYCLED MATERIAL,10"4 POST CONSUMER c: CITY �iF RENTON Hearing Examiner Earl Clymer, Mayor Fred J.Kaufman February 19, 1993 Colin Quinn 16031 119th PL NE Bothell, WA 98011 RE: The Bluffs File No. R;SA-044-89 Dear Mr. Quinn: The Examiner's Report and Recommendation and Reconsideration Letter regarding the referenced proposal have not been appealed within the extended time period established by ordinance. You will have to execute restrictive covenants complying with the requirements as outlined in the Examiner's Report, as modified by the Reconsideration, issued February 5, 1993, copy enclosed. Also included is a sample of the format to be used for the covenants, which should be accompanied by a legal description of the property in the "Exhibit A" format, and the condominium Homeowner's Association documents. Restrictive covenants must be approved by the City Attorney prior to execution. Please provide a copy of your drafted covenants to our office for forwarding to the City Attorney for review. After_our receipt of the executed covenants, the matter will be forwarded to the City Clerk for City Council review. You will be notified of all action taken by the City Council upon approval of the request, and the covenants will be filed with King County by the City Clerk. Please feel free to contact this office if further assistance or information is required. Sincerely, Lii--01\___F RED J. KAUFMAN HEARING EXAMINER FJK:wmb cc: City Cleric, . Building Division. . ' • , , - Planning Division • • Paul Forsander. Larry Warren 200''Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2593 CITY YI? RENTON Hearing Examiner goim Earl Clymer, Mayor Fred J. Kaufman February 5, 1993 Colin Quinn 16031 119th PL NE Bothell, WA 98011 Re: The Bluffs File No. R;SA-044-89 Dear Mr. Quinn: This office has reviewed your request for reconsideration as well as some additional staff comments regarding this matter and the response follows. Point A: This office believes that a covenant that establishes the project as a residential condominium but eliminates ownership percentages would be appropriate and the condition is hereby altered to reflect that change. Point B: Regarding sidewalk construction, the applicant has already demonstrated that some of the physical constraints of this site can be overcome to accommodate an intense level of development on and around this very steep site, and the installation of a sidewalk along the eastern edge of Lake Washington Boulevard is presumably no more difficult than the retaining walls and rockeries the applicant has, already proposed for other areas of the complex. This proposal includes a physically two-tiered complex with most of the . • amenities on the upper level. The applicant appears to suggest that human nature be ignored with the expectation that residents of the lower tier will cross to the west side of Lake Washington Boulevard, walk south along the west side of the street and then re- cross the street to climb up the hill to the recreational facilities and reverse this procedure on the return home. What will happen more likely is that residents will walk. . along the unimproved shoulder on the east side of Lake Washington Boulevard, possibly interfering with or maneuvering around vehicular traffic on that roadway. This office will not modify the sidewalk location without a specific engineering report that indicates that it is impossible or nearly impossible to provide the sidewalk on the east side of Lake Washington Boulevard. Point C: This office intended that there be three methods of walking to the upper tier; the sidewalk along the access road, and the walkways/stairways between Buildings F and E, and between Building A and Lake Washington Boulevard. The two walkways/stairways were intended to avoid, once again, the tendency of humans to take short routes even when'they are.not officially sanctioned or designated. There appear to be appropriate slopes that would facilitate this second walkway/stairway from the vicinity of the letter "L" in the word "LAKE" near the south aspect of the printed phrase "LAKE 200 Mill Avenue South -Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2593 • .. CITY RENTON `. , Hearing Examiner Earl Clymer, Mayor Fred J.Kaufman Colin Quinn February 5, 1993 Page 2 WASHINGTON BLVD." found on'Exhibit #5 and rising up to near the north central portion of the west wall of Proposed Building A. Again, this office acknowledges that the applicant is already providing a great deal of engineering prowess to accommodate this development and these additional amenities seem no more ill-advised, particularly to avoid the problem of social trails. These details are intended to make the project more appropriate for its residents. These stairways can, also limit the exposure of residents to traffic along Lake Washington Boulevard by shortening the distances between the lower and upper tiers of the development in the event a sidewalk cannot be accommodated on the east side of the Boulevard. Point D: Other than the fact that compliance with the proposed.condition to incorporate notification language in each deed might be cumbersome, there does not appear to be any reason.to alter the proposed condition. Point E: This condition will be and is hereby altered to reflect that any phasing of the project which"may-occur-shall make provisions for the needs of emergency access as required by the Emergency Services Departments and that all storm water utilities be designed by the applicant and approved'by the City prior to the issuance of any Building Permits. The original intent was to limit the exposure of early residents to continued disruptions in the event the project was phased. If you have any additional-qii-estiori or- concerns please feel free to write. 'This and the remaining aspects of this proposal may=b`e'=appealed to the City Council. As a result of this' reconsideration the appeal period has been extended to--not later than 5:00 p.m., February 19,'1993. The request for reconsideration and memo froni staff-are available in this office for review by interested parties. Sincerely, FRED J. KAUFMAN - HEARING EXAMINER FJK:wmb ' cc: - Mayor Clymer ---- ' ' Larry Warren . Paul Forsander : - • ' Don.Erickson ' -_ " ' - Parties of Record 200 Mill Avenue South -Renton, Washington_98055 -(206)23'5-2593 CITY OF RENTON ♦ ♦ bal �� MEMORANDUM NT Date: February 1, 1993 To: Fred Kaufman I 1/ 4 From: Don Erickson On, 11993 Staff Contact: Paul Forsander 11E1411ING Subject: Reconsideration of Rezone Recommendations & Site Plan Conditions for The Bluffs, File No. ECF; R; SA-044-89 Staff have reviewed your decision dated January 12, 1993 and the applicant's request for reconsideration dated January 26, 1993 and offer the following comments: 1. Rezone Recommendation No. 3: Staff agree with the intent of the condition to set upward limits on the percentage of condominium units which may be rented. Perhaps the condition could be revised to allow up to 50 % of the units to be rented out at any one time, provided that those units are either owner occupied or owned by individual owners who own no more than two (2) units in the project. 2. Site Plan Condition No. 12: Development of a sidewalk on the east side of Lake Washington Boulevard may be physically and economically unfeasible because of the location of the shear bluff with respect to the eastern edge of the right-of-way. We believe that a sidewalk on the west side of the street would work if the applicant is also required to construct crosswalks at the main entrance driveway and at the north end of the site. Finally we believe clarification of this matter will be necessary for Board of Public Works approval of a sidewalk on the west side of Lake Washington Boulevard. 3. Site Plan Condition No. 13: We assume that one of the two required "hill climbs" would consist of the currently proposed pedestrian walkway along the driveway to the upper portion of the site. This walkway in combination with a hill climb/stair in the vicinity of Buildings "E" & "F" would appear to satisfy the need to circulate between the lower and upper portions of the site. In staff's opinion, construction of any additional hill climbs or stairs could be disruptive to the site's steep slopes and greenbelt areas. 4. Site Plan Condition No. 19: At the December 15, 1992 Public Hearing, staff presented a site phasing recommendation similar to Condition No. 19. During the hearing, staff also pointed out in response to discussion of phasing problems by the applicant, that there may be alternative phasing schemes that could be considered. In looking at the phasing question again, we believe that Site Plan Condition No. 19 may possibly conflict with Condition Al b) contained in the Bluffs Mitigation Document (issued October 9. 1992) which . required: "In order to minimize disruption of steep slope areas, the geotechnical/hydraulics consultant(s) shall prepare a construction phasing plan and erosion control plan for all grading, clearing and re-landscaping within the 40% slope areas with the exception of the entrance road and the northern maintenance road, prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit." We don't believe that it was the either staffs or the Examiner's intent to grade the entire site before the issuance of building permits. Rather, we were all concerned that roadway and infrastructure improvements be installed first. A simple way to resolve this matter would be to delete "site grading" from item 1) of Condition No. 19. We hope that these comments may be useful in your deliberation on this matter. If you have any questions please call Paul or myself. Thank you. memo2 Ai BAN 26 1993 January 26, 1993 aeaV�i� Mr. Fred J. Kaufman, Hearing Examiner City of Renton Renton City Hall 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 Re: File No. R; SA-044-89 The Bluffs Dear Mr. Hearing Examiner: As representative of and on behalf of the owners of the above referenced condominium project, pursuant to Title IV, Chapter 8, Section 15 of the Renton City Code, I hereby respectfully request reconsideration of certain recommendations and conditions of your January 12, 1993 Report and Recommendation for the project. We believe these recommendations and conditions may be ambiguous and/or based on error of law or fact, and should be modified as described below. A. RECOMMENDATION 3 This recommendation would require the applicant to enter into covenants for the contemplated condominium which prohibit more than 25% of the units from being rented at any one time. We request that this recommendation be modified to require only that a covenant be entered into establishing the project as a residential condominium and providing for the sale of individual units, and that the remainder of the recommendation be eliminated. Establishing the 25% limit on renting the units would be unfair, impractical, unreasonable, and unenforceable. It also appears that it is not based on any finding, SEPA policy, ordinance or rule of the City of Renton, nor based on any possible anticipated environmental impact of the project, and we therefore question the basis or authority for this recommendation. We also believe this recommendation may be in violation of state law, as discussed below. The modification of this recommendation is requested for the following reasons. Mr. Fred J. Kaufman January 26, 1993 Page 2 1. Such a prohibition against an owner renting his unit unfairly discriminates against condominium owners. No such limitation on renting has been applied to other single family homes or other privately owned property in the City of Renton. 2 . This prohibition may also be a violation of certain provisions of the State Condominium Act. RCW 64. 34. 050 (1) states as follows: A zoning, subdivision, building code, or other real property law, ordinance, or regulation may not prohibit the condominium form of ownership or impose any requirement upon a condominium which it would not impose upon a physically identical development under a different form of ownership. (Emphasis added) . Would the City of Renton require that an owner of an apartment complex not rent over 25% of his apartment units at any one time, or that a residential subdivision not lease over 25% of the homes at any one time? 3 . Also, limits against renting of units would make it impossible to obtain financing for the project. Any lender must have the ability in the event of foreclosure to lease the units while attempting to sell them. We do not believe lenders will finance a condominium or a unit in a condominium with such a limitation in place. 4. Similarly, during the initial sales of units, the developer may have to rent vacant units depending on how quickly sales occur, since the marketplace takes time to absorb the units, especially in a slow. economy. It would make the project financially infeasible if he is prevented from doing this during the sell out phase. 5. Such a prohibition would also significantly affect the price and marketability of the condominium units. It is obvious that any potential owner will want the ability to rent his condominium unit in the event of temporary job relocation, for example, which he may be prohibited from doing by this rent prohibition. If for any reason an owner must move from his unit and is unable to sell it, he would of course want the ability to rent it. 6. Creating the "revolving pool" described in Recommendation 3 we do not believe would be feasible, workable, or acceptable to lenders, developers and/or unit owners. No owner would (and likely could nor afford to) accept a lesser Mr. Fred J. Kaufman January 26, 1993 Page 3 amount from this "pool" if it did not cover his mortgage. Also, who would pay homeowners association dues for unrented units for maintenance of the common areas, landscaping and other features? 7 . Moreover, this limitation on renting may be a violation of RCW 35.21.830, which states as follows: The imposition of controls on rent is of state-wide significance and is preempted by the state. No city or town of any class may enact, maintain, or enforce ordinances or other provisions which regulate the amount of rent to be charged for single family or multiple unit residential rental structures . . . . Recommendation 3 would prohibit a condominium owner from charging any rent for his unit if the 25% level were reached, which is in effect rent control that would be in violation of the above statute. In summary, no public policy is furthered by Recommendation 3 . The goal is to create saleable and affordable residential units and making this project a. condominium project achieves this goal. Further prohibitions on whether a person owns or rents a unit does nothing to promote public health or welfare and/or safeguard the public interest and safety. B. CONDITION 12 We request that Condition 12 be modified to make clear that the required sidewalk could be constructed on either side of Lake Washington Boulevard, subject to Engineering Department approval. Due to physical grade constraints within and abutting the Lake Washington Boulevard right of way, construction of a sidewalk adjacent to the property may be physically impossible or very expensive to accomplish. It may be more feasible and have greater public benefit to locate the walkway entirely or in part on the Coulon Park side of the road. If located on the Park side of the roadway, adequate crosswalks would be provided to ensure pedestrian safety. However, this condition should be clarified to allow the sidewalk to be constructed on either side of the road. C. CONDITION 13 We request clarification of the "two separate hill climbs" referenced in this condition. We are assuming that the sidewalk along the entry drive would serve as the hill climb connecting the upper terrace in the vicinity of Buildings A, C or D and Lake Washington Boulevard. The construction of any other hill climb Mr. Fred J. Kaufman January 26, 1993 Page 4 in this area of the property would occur on the steepest part of the property and would be significantly more destructive and dangerous. D. CONDITION 14 (b) Condition 14 (b) requires covenants on the land, as well as on each condominium deed, requiring on-going maintenance of common areas and participation in the homeowners association. We request that the language "as well as on each condominium deed" be deleted from this condition. As is required for every condominium in the State of Washington, each deed conveying a unit in the The Bluffs condominium will be subject to the Condominium Declaration for the project (which by law must provide for assessment of dues and maintenance of common areas) , and each owner of a unit will be a member of the homeowners association. As is also the general practice, each individual deed will not, however, specifically state that such maintenance and participation is required, although the deed will subject the unit and the owner to the Declaration, which is recorded and of record, and which will require maintenance of common areas. The Declaration that provides for assessment of dues, maintenance of common areas and participation in the homeowners association is required to be recorded and all unit owners are subject to the Declaration by law. Owners are also required by the recent State Condominium Act to be provided with a public offering statement containing significant additional disclosure regarding the operation of the condominium and expenses of maintaining common areas. Adding these details to each deed conveying a unit, which is already subject to the Declaration, would be overly cumbersome, unnecessary in light of the information required by law to be provided to potential buyers, and would create unwarranted difficulties. E. CONDITION 19 Condition 19 states that if the project is phased, all site preparation must be done for all portions of the site before issuance of any building permits. This condition does not make clear what would occur if the project is not phased, or if the buildings are built in phases. We therefore request that this condition be clarified to state that if the project is not phased, the applicant may obtain the building permits and then proceed with site preparation and construction all in one phase. It would be virtually impossible Mr. Fred J. Kaufman January 26, 1993 Page 5 to close the financing of a project without the building permit. Most developers could not afford to do the extensive clearing and grading without that financing. Also, although phasing is not currently contemplated, we question the reason for this condition at all. If the project were phased, we do not believe you would want the entire site graded and cleared first, especially if the first and second buildings are only on a small part of the site. This condition would require clearing and grading of the entire development area before a building permit could be issued and financing obtained. This would mean larger portions of the site would be modified and exposed for significantly extended periods of time prior to building construction, if phasing did occur. This condition would also be counter to the objective stated in the staff report for the project of protecting sensitive areas and steep slopes. Requiring site preparation for all portions of the site prior to issuance of a building permit is unusual, impractical and provides less environmental protection. Normally, clearing and grading, storm drainage and utility work are reviewed as part of the building permit. This ensures that all the components of the permit fit the project. F. CONCLUSION For the foregoing reasons, we respectfully request that the Hearing Examiner modify the recommendations and conditions as . described above. We believe these modifications clarify what will be required of the developer, and will make the project more feasible and practical while still protecting the public health, safety and welfare. Your reconsideration of this matter is very much appreciated. Respectfully submitted, 9'7 Colin Quinn Owners' Representative cc: Owners of the Bluffs Paul Forsander John E. Phillips The Quinn Company January 17 , 1993 OEVE"PMFNRFN 0NWG GIN 2 p 1993 Mr. Paul Forsander Development Services Division RECE City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Wa. 98055 RE: The Bluffs Dear Paul : The purpose of this letter is to inform you that as of January 16, 1993 , I will be conducting my real estate consulting business as The Quinn Company. This change of business name and address will not affect my current involvement in The Bluffs . I look forward to our continued work together towards the success of the project . All future communications should be directed to : The Quinn Company 3318-239th Avenue S . E. Issaquah, Wa. 98027 ( 206) 391-0737 Thank you for your cooperation with this transition. If you have any questions , please call me at 391-0737 . Sincerely, Colin Quinn The Quinn Company 3318 239th AVENUE S.E. • ISSAQUAH,WA. 98027 (206) 391-0737 y . AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING STATE OF WASHINGTON ) )ss. County of King ) WANDA M. BRITTS , being first duly sworn, upon oath, deposes and states: 1993 That on the 12th day of January , affiant deposited in the mails of the United States a sealed envelope containing a decision or recommendation with postage prepaid, addressed to the parties of record in the below entitled application or petition. 1993 SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this I a day of J( t,�,�,� , _ agejli.)2e.e otary • for the State of Washington, it + residing at ,,,,Q,,Lyieb,, therein. Application, Petition, or Case # R;SA;-0 4 4-8 9 The Bluff s (The minutes contain a list of the parties of record.) HEARING EXAMINER'S REPORT Colin Quinn R;SA-044-89 January 12, 1993 Page 20 openly rebut the evidence. Any violation of this doctrine would result in the invalidation of the request by the Court. The Doctrine applies not only to the initial public hearing but to all Requests for Reconsideration as well as Appeals to the City Council. ____------ ----_ . l I . _ . .. .\\ . \ •••• \ / .,A.----‘-'5,••.•';';'•••;-.:-;.:::•—•-•• 41 . .• , : . „ • . • \ Ghildrens\ ... . . •. \.. ,...„ . ' -..,. '•••,..1-49me // ' ,• ••••••:::-.s.,,:l - In- i . I -. .,\-.., . \, ,,-. . ;x, • , ' . • • . . , • ."., •,... , \ \\:, N\.., . s. • f ! = - - . • . 's • ...-i - r' ' ; . ss.si Single- • • . ', • . VN ' \\•\ . \\._,...\., ..... f•••••-11 Family_ . • to R-1 ,; .., ..,.. . \• , • ---1 -•Homes. • ,-- c) %V : ,-... sr w k \\ ...\ '‘.. R 3 , . . ,. : • \\•\ <i' • • •t . • •. . .\ ' 1"." 1, % t 1 • . •.,,— A . • • • • st Is %k U) \ M o b i 1 e • 1 1 • %I \ ---------'''"-- ,. N %,•4 ss \ `I Home ---ar \ . • -4. 1 -;\ \Park \ I \ s: •''• s•N \ 1 F- • , \-... , • . \ Vs, „ A \ I ! ;) Vs; •.:• . A 1 , , , •q...:::::::" N I - • , 1/(•• -*. i i . ‘ I : : E i . '• ;1 Marina ' I ..,. 3 .1., ....„ ., i ip ,-. ‘.: i Landing II i f< v:;,...,:;.....-.............. ' Apartments s.,..•.•:,-;,:.:3.:::•.:z.:-.•-•..\• -:..- ;.... I . , -.„.. ....... • .... s %. s... -.... .0 i •• : . ,,.., .. . • ... .\,..:.\\\..\ %....-"' ..: ? / • 1 t< i SITE . ...,,....\\sc. • • s'• ..‘•••, i • . •1:' s )1 . . „,••\/‘. ss 1 .LEGEND , i i •.:.t . 1,= •. :.. , f sy-r•••:- 0 Symbol DISTRICT USE : s,,,sn•:. ••;. . i, ; .-7 •• I - G-1 • General-Single-Family i 1--:k\ - ." '..-1.,,,,,. .„/" .. i .'.: „.1 • - - l R-1 . Residential-Single-Family -, •:.ks WO': ....,41; 'f C Park"'\'*P'• s'o'ig. '•- 'R-1.: iI R-1 . . R-3 Residential-Multiple-Family Entnc - R-4 Residential-Multiple-Family . ra. . e 19%--‘..... s\.1 , B-1 Residential-Business Use I;(*::". 71a .,),A, s‘.....1 • : 1 , f :• i' .•'; • ' P-1 Public Use i :. -:. -„,... 1:r-'4 3... :......„.•:,. . - .. s."'",. •si .... ..„....--.... ! H-1 Heavy Industrial . s,.. •:. %.: •-:.: \",i • '•73•%'',\-.. :s.. I ;.GENE . ',. :.. ••••-: ..........._. . I', ''' A North - • , , ,..1C-OULON ... , . ,,..-. ,... ,.: / . ... . • •• ' • ..: , • (MEMORIAL ,.. ..---::::=-.;:------------------'..., EACH PARK d 1 r „ -N. ..: • : - , ,., ....8.,.... : 1 \ • £ P-1 ParkR-4 t I , . ,,/ /././ - ...• ,/ / //' • .. . . . Entrancei - / . . 7 / .,!.., • 1.;.:::,::..:-.;!:,c.... / . . \ • /V4 . . . ' • 1 I f •.::. :.: • -`••• • --• /1/. - , • . • -.1 , ...-‘,-.... ....... - - , ,,.. PLANNING DIVISION• . • , ----------------- TY OF RENTON . • . ... • . . ' ' .. ,_ ...._, . .. • • . . . • . • • .. .... • , . - NOV 1 9 1N2 • -: . . • • . . .,...,,,-..:,.., ..,.. .,..;.,..-.:. .„-“,,,,,...i..: , -:.,,,,-..---,.-....• •. ----- - . . . - EIVED ..:,,..: '. - -,- •. ,. . : - :-.. 1-!,,:-: ' •l''''•- tt:r. ••-•:,7, • ' •. • • - .: " ' -. . Zoning and Surrounding Uses Map I, , . .....•,.,, .,... .... :, . ,. .. .... . , ,.- .i',..;• .. ....,.. . , . . . . • ..: - -.'' , '•, .. . . - O . • ®® foI ! i El ! ElE111 d!áTT1E I �-- - oil I.^-E1 Ertl n 1 ETU E %C7 R =- I. I .PIMA= - _ == _ - _ = • ir -U I i . ,n_1 : :um e _ i m -iiil� llII_`I_ I I I _fl Il_Cn- sit 1 uI I I�1=—'yi —_ ist jsuva,,'i:•..� :.. THE BLUFFS WEST ELEVATION Gui SIOE a m 000 ICI El ®11 . LE g i" - eg -sism ----1i 1 -_ _ _ -=. _ - __: o , � I©CIS � 00001 .J ' I © do ' : ;;-_ ' I _ W -I I--D -iI �'o CI—C! 0 `� I I __,r- --1� '. _-11: _- _ --____i_--_= -- _ ; - - tie o ir _re ■i- m a i�ii—r_..ininigE I_lii li!__L- • jlii�� '�;1! i;1i?;oOk�li�i_ ___- —. -_ —_ --- SOUTH ELEVATION _ . �.1F�4� + woz9Qamar+ a(:,11.dl '1' ai :I xk;i: t . a' _ = = _ .. 'its :i_ =.1::CliE.ff_iI.I:nil =.I::I:==-win: . . _ 1 ■N� I l- ii ii is 111=L-mi.....'II . .-:_. i•-•111CId uNiamir i�liI im iI_.._75.. ...k-r_a_i___1_111 it-rmill-V©IIi 11C:l _:1:1 • u..� 11! ■ �1=i! I{..''=;��1�IIiill��i � ! 1n1 iii1 (111 VIEW ELEVATION • • THE I:LUFFS . WWF-,___________AllA '. M . . ' • 1-4 h1:3 � `__'-'.;. a-- . __ - =-_ = _=-__-_ =F4 = •I■■II aAi1�1 _ill i - - i II =_ _= _ - = — a •;.. == ==—=_— _ =i ■■ lIq III 8n z =n=� IL=- 01 f _ _�...�, y _=:_ - END ELEVATION pn a a -fix _ • _:._.__ - _ . ENTRY ELEVATION , ,. 1 Ir_____-53) - . . it Ull•E TP . . , .. N7--= ...—.__I — Elm- ._ `CI\..----- ta-,.., l0 El -` UHE 1 __ � p PM :II . . r� _ =— d0 is . q:- II ri._ .. F----- 7--- :_—• — = _. :-. I • 1 • 11.. �.,i. I (,i <l .1, 1. 1-,• I--f • 1 • I • f I I I I' I•,.Ii I — _ •__ L.�l•�r I . _- , WEST ELEVATION ' • THE BLUFFS - - • • __77----1 itR El ---1- ^ _ I ^ 0i 10 0_ m_Cf 111111 . • . _ i I■.1 _I a ono ►�_I-I II-1I -_ ___ t- ■ 11 u -o 11o. ■ ■ LriMnCnCM Un L =1 .0—=- ; la3 -li-- `�'1_I imam i Lf3 ; • • 1 • 1; ••-1 - 1-J--I - I-.I - . I I----• _-- SOUTH ELEVATION �-S r . . • 111111-7,:f. .-- • - • __ _ _.,--__ -----4=±---1----.---7.-- =_-_`Nab, • 1 ....,:k ;-'..="7".-".•&-:': --_-..7 =_._.-_ III :"..:fizINI-1.-f Mlle .11 °- ----- - -1•11 : ---' •::- --,.....:..Lf-=--_L- t , ti ;'-E1B-1 .1---1T7 (-V:•." - I i ill .:7 F. 11 a±-:-1.- - ..•-'• = -- 10.--1-- -.1-- -,F.----=,-------A1111 ,___, it; ifi I 11 r. 1-11+-1[.1_F i _:- R 1.,..t.„kERIEB_,,_ :: •• _. _:„....„..„.. ,., 1111 ,.:...1.ri 4 11:1:15-- ZUIE1- a= = • . .. i,,,-.,-,. END ELEVATION INTERIOR END ELEVATION • ., . - - . , . . . . -..- Irini.=_I=E;_::11 CO1111.1'--,-ii 1 II V "ii 11 i ffill11111mili 11:4-7-1:111•11F.-P.I.7- fitZ .ii II ;:,J!MINII 4..• -• __. _.....__ - . 7- ---:-_111.12,,mal IF:...-iT.:::•; _ . .- .-•-ilr..7-f7,..,..p •_. :-:li ilff,i111111111.F01111.--: .:1 I p -paii it 11-AmIFIRAT:91=11 •••_ _,,...„.,_ ..,. . . • „ . _ ENTRY ELEVATION .. . . .. ) • • THE ILLUFFS :s91-101.7PD7 20DCXIMICTIS BUII_DINq- J T .i : 0,„,„ 0 ,••.-,:it: :Th,•: :: . • . '; •s. :ii:",•: : . : . . . • . , , • • • En ��: _ ►. _ .I.■__=■■ Mill=.Mill _ • ■■■■W�iI:il •mil . ■- -=--■:-=it i ■■■ ■■■Mil■-■■■_ =_Fly I I :�_ �_ .--==- -_-_i _=FF{11-=MIEN _ END ELEVATION INTERIOR END ELEVATION • -=q = - q � _gip -_REV • ..ems -- ENTRY ELEVATION • • THE I.,LU]FIFS • . - , 2F. :, ,; .• . BUILIDI G . . . . t. 'A ....„. SE 1/4, NW 1/4 .6 NE 1/4, SW 1/4 d SE 1/4, SW 1/4, SEC. 5, TWP. 23 N.,RGE. 5 E., W.M. • 1,:.• kt' • _____.____,L.-t 1, .......,, - ..i _ INTERSTATE 405/ ---- . _::..77--:-.. ______:___:: _— . ,• . - ________,______. . ... ., ._ . . . .. • - - - .. ----:::----- _ ..._. --_-___ . ) ) ,..-:'!"-,....--•:;--- -/17 -.---<•4."------;---77- ---'-• .-"----- -----T----.7:::-t'-- ._. ._ .._ .._.. .• ••• •?'. 7-::::?..:: i i 1 ; • , _0,E:. ), •-••-----7, ...i. ' 7-7:::-- 1. -,'fj //'--- -.-:•- ....-.•.•7:1'2:-.',.•'4.y!" ..:,;''le'‘ ,•:' ):. „ ,..2•';'".`,:• '` • 2 ,•• ,..,-,_...1. _ ( . , :..4.:7=7; ../.0) -" .•`',,\ \ \ ,..",..----',..,e, A/ii I il .•' •'' •':•--' '.' . . ' \( \ ''f • si ' . . .- ..•-•'.- --f-—-`----"-•—- - • ••••• 4'•• .,.1 Z.'. ':.••••'''''''.r---- .r''' . ‘. I .• \/r ./ -,4'V" ••• ' - --- '''' ,--i------r rgigrOjAri .-..""'.'s''''',..,...-,...6-,,i,-.-2,4-t4,11.4""...f ..,.• ,,,....Y1.4-.^k ,\\:':A i -74' Lq § 1 10 .t. t@itliii..-:'PI-------- ,rtx.-.__.."'.gi_....me..7.40-0 . •411&-":-,ze.,,,.,_.,,,..,:..ii.i_ -_-::y_-,4,:,:.i.-*,;,.._.__)..5,,,+.:1.1..\. 4.- -. z \ \\ 1 ( ( - •.' ‘ -..4116'1.e ' #.°•;. ••P*. ^-------"'•--- '. • •••,<=.Q2 .nfritg -rt'' :4,119m.-4,..„..."4-tnri....2s/ragile--Z- _ -9 1" .,,...._, . • .' .. •^ -< '...\\ .t.. 1 • ,.-- '?" ;.^,: —',Ma /', -'‘... •. t ' \ 1 I (.. f4117:."•7_! / EF: .,,tv ,„\\ _ .... •....,..„...„...„ .., 'AI. r...4011:- ' ;4• - -- --,ii.' - -____________ 7 r-----\\ , -,. . my .------•-7_-_,-,1,4 i • 4111 4 " ;44'25-,,-- ---,-• -:- , ______ ,•,. .,..,....,....„:„:„.„,,• z2 i ._,,,,,/ .1. ,../../ i i „/„._... ..—\ c ,,,,,,..... _----:—_________f_-•-_--7-----_---, --\\ • '• . .7.,,-.i_-..:,----:.....z.--7'--14.6 .i 1 ---",_ -- ../''''/.6' ___-------k. // 7-./. /-7;:----.,,,- _......._..„,,-----_-,,, , ,,. \ \..• - /_______ _.- , ... .:, -________-) •---,-,1 ---,::?..,,,,,, ; ,_,/,- .. ...• ... ..._...._... •:_......„. . , ,} .,,,,_.tr., 0 .1, /.. ..- :-.;-. - -T-'-'... 7--- .....,.. '• •1. --.1:,,.___;.:.--,41--' .11:.•-''''' ....\,j .\.:f..:\. ''::::::- -. • : '.-. s'''.\^":""<:. \\\ ) ' -00.4:0;;;;:. 1:11 L r, . ',.... . .-......... - IV ..... ._. '...:- ::„..-."--,77, ,., „ , 0,3,-.„, --• , t \ _-, - ,...- ., ,i• ..,„,, ..-,- „,„....-- „.. (c,....., ..1 . --\:-... .. ,..7,. ',•,::::::...:,-- -:::::-.1---7:::----c,-. '°. '•'"•-"/'''.. ' ' 1 `'- .----- \ •‘ ` ( i,I I i. ,'''''---:.','="- ---,;:1-::::-."- ; \...,. -----'---:-:•:.---1*-=-Z:-:-------:-.:'-',.?--z:: •-:::-..----T---------- -,_:_-___ "------,,V. ' •••.;,i:‘ - . "..---- , __--- . -----:.:::•---,-----_-__:...-_----__=-_L.:-..:_:_,_,z..._.----..____-,..."01 , g•<Q. 7 sX, , -. ) 1 / /C----- ------7----:•...`-Z:-.---''''''' <•7•'''••"2".•:- , r .-' •' ,.:."..-••'• -,:-....'• i."-• . (-",•5•:•--- \ \X__ •''• '.-.."-•,:- )11 • ( ( I r 1.c.,),..-- \' \ ___. \-k. .... I __ .7••?_-__ ..t"..!--.7 - r --- -- ---------•-• - 10 IV. '-‘1‘# A _ ---.• /-"....::-../.. -:•••1-----------•,I\_ _ \ 4 • .-- .. '>21./A•1"'-. .,,' • ..• ..--,..„) 4 •.,<4."" u.) „ -',/, .---/,----... - -----.----. - -N \ ' \ ..v, .-..._. 1 ,.,..°' ik‘i; •tioo' . 0,- - , ...:- ... ,.., , -7-, \ ) \ ),/,,/,/ .... \ = •, . \ „.. ..... ) ; 7/ ,,..:......- .-- ). -----, --- / -, .41, ,;,.... ...•.4, , ..-.., . ,41.4 ,,- 0.• -, . ,....„.. ,010.. ,,, r„,.......- --- \ , , , •\ t ] 4--- /.-- TcC.--z.z-z .,. < i v7A .'•••'.;4,,,,‘ ,.... ,.... • ili,. ...„,, , z`," I (l 4 \ --4..:',..---N2•,•••-•4,, 4 ii.111P. -• '4'- -2 't ' N I.‘)' V -•-•----7")) '' / \ \ , , ,-,-....... 1:,k....1/1 •1, ...I a . ,. •----.•:__... d q -.• -----` -".•1'4'r:•;'1/-:.,- '. ' \VI 1 -- -..::%--:____. •;-- --, .. . , . . ''JZ::•:•::: -"•-'1.' ......-.'••‘2-- ---- --....--•------;51. -7Y'/"f#-:-. '-• s, - ', '''---..----". \ _...---\--c‘ \ ••‘ . .. .... . ..- '••••;\ s 1---.",...;••!....t,-'.:", :1,.."--.-..0 '''l- . .r. ---' .-----.-----i------ - ________-% _---- ...p.... - • ..-1 • • .,, --i• .-- 2 T. ,........-- C' .-.. 0 . - - ..--------'''''-- r -e.. ....-- 'zt , ..z.._...• li£TAINiet0 W4LL ......----. ..-------'" PLAN ,-- ,4,6 , .......----' \i _ .-,,--- i k"" ASPHALT CONTACTE FAVEMCATT -- I.DEEP J oR I G-(NPki____ \\ :..., e . I.., \\ ::.-----REramix5 reau 45 REOLIFICO - _...,.."...,-;.--iS.....Mair . . li • ,..--. )I!‘ riE -Pc,loic ) . • EMERGENCY ACCESS ROAD SECTION I"-50' . .67131 . . . . • - • • . . ...,- • . . . . . -.-.1 SE 1/4, NW 1/4 d NE 1/4, SW 1/4 d SE.1/4, SW 1/4, SEC.5, TWP. 23 N.,RGE. 5 E., W.M. S _-- --,------ _ - --- " .)--— ) - --..:7----:.-:•---° (1.,. . - ------1::;----":" _ cis A ---. r -- -------.7-2N, \•\ q. , STATE..._405 '1 ' 1 cr= N' \‘•\\ 1 / .i. _---. . M ----,-- •--*.)•..i)i,z, r---------_, ) /.-.---- _ • . --:,..„,-A • I.„ , ),• , --_,--\.., ____ , •, 4 , _ - „.._—..---- 4P.• ''';'-11"-: /...'.e.' ,......,?,,I, : ,N.'•\\--r--------;-e" .s... : ' - ':/ .." /. ,tr. • ///' . - ----.e. -...f.:.-- -f.--.-_--- - --66,te ,..„7 c t ..., ,;(,,,A4 :".>, ,---,„•:\‘';.; \ .-. -- I f 7 j , ,,..-. ..".' ,-,ra.--,-wi - lap ,a • --/ - _--...i.:.--,...;:,;',.'7.:•4:-.11_,-,..,-,•-•,-, .,,\:., s.."•'.. - \\ ',s-i„...:1:1..-\ —.-4,- ( .'4x/----' .:11,1-151?ill : ..... -`-0 t . ' .f- sr-,e,-o'r.:7!----.: ''-'---.;,„,.. ,\• '•: \,.\ \ -f- A \ -_-_-_--------- /4, 01 § • °% - \ • R f--4• ,,,,,14- .41.1i,,,---,--t4- ' ----. --t1.1.,..___ / ,.., 5 t• ,-,---:ajl ,•'.., -.0_,,I• ' ••\•.• -•. \-I' \ ,\,...:7'....i...:i..\,•:"'\'''?\\\.,.,_.,_`:-"7-:„,,,,,,. 1,(//4.,'..,-,4--.-----, —107—':-.-74-?.'dift,,i,e.' • t--,-. 44‘./.11; .':- :41'2 0/1 i 44:II 2;4.3 1 fi,,7. 4...74.4'.. , ;&It .-K,,. -\ ) (t\\ -..\::::&----:.„:-.2/__ ) ZI i q ‘„ • 1.p .01 ,_., ..1---=,..=---_____/ "---------,`".-- , . ' ' ef' ...t..''•rili .?/.'..,--. ‘t 1'1 \N. e ' r\..\\,, .\ ,....___,„.__,_ . "A. v .:,...1...„......._1 .,a, ,-;_ii,v-,, ... ,;4.,,,,,6:-.•,-,_-4.--,,,e,. i .3 ' , -3,\tlk. ,. ./1 „ , r,-,• ---_-_--,---.-- c\i ,2.,%,.0,. ..1 9-0.--0,1 ' 'E ir",' 4...,, -..0 , •14/ . ---,ap‘ •-' '' i •:‘-f?:/- .,f',',1,4*--• •-<V, s —'OW Oi .-i w yfn, k,-.... ' --- -,'=,.. ?;--.1. •.. .....1.-.---',4 .4.. _ ,1/4.. .,,,-• ...,,t4';' 1.',.6 ''4.-' ''' .---- ' \ 'k\l, •,,,.., :100,00.40,%1"`:',/.--'' ..\ --- -- -yi e °1-44!..'4' 1*^:". '' • , . __--- ,4'reet.. 1,.-; .4, „ ,F•''' 'et,41 .. ,-"./1":",'.1', 1 40'4 . ‘1,• , et--,--.° &' ..,t-,.: ,,,,,r0e 4/44 '4,, 1 .• • -"" C\t l*/''. ii..„.• : ,e,/zo .-- -,L. -...:.. ::..ve44.,.. .--1. -'-':'_,°-% 11\ .7'N•e\ .'f-',--1 4. -,,,. rta'..writ,tt.„... ,,-cthriatt,'''f -'''7'd' g) -- /- -. • • C i ';,/ : ..11'lb;.4kA. , ,e. .401. ''', ''1, 1..- tp Kill ,.'''-i---::1\-- ..7.-i• •:;_r ' 0 i,;' 4c\,,..\,•":--.:--'---f.-2, \I'rol5.1.,.,'-'"*ol..'.01•ao...'442V. . .' ---V A' '5° i 5 3.... --. - ---,,, ,... . ,A. ••:t%,... .g..." i s• r .V';, -t•-,!..vynt• me iiiii• - _, 1._--V_. . 1 i - 4';'t ",- ..`'\ ' '-* .. -e ,.."Mf ."- , .--':')`"(.:`''' - .. • • •••••,,-. '4' •------_. ^4, , my . •_....4' (/).-:-.,,,, .,r-•.....,‘>,% • c_F..,a 0,,*0., lce-!:.---------.'-,-,.---„9°'.'%—*/..... .a...;.,, -,,,...Z.-.,, ,,,,2„...- fit,,J,.1 ....:x.,, ,,..,( 0,,„......."-I`"- Ing.,._ ',1 -.-___ - .„ ,..1.:,--;,,„„,.., . ail 02 ' !,.-,.-.! -....-,-!... .t?4'i-- -."'.f..:::-..° ..,... ..-* 1.`"' --\N.',' .4 i .,,,./_.-'<:-1,0,4,4.4\ '"'"'• .t , /..'••--,_-,e7 k 1. • 'y -4 7•••■•' --:,-----.• , --.1.74 „, 4,---.•>-, . ':.:',.. --: :-.1`.:'0,-7- --: ..)1c ---•,;.' ..0"....:,7...1.-".:.•',"'' .—7.- : .,'.• ‘;';,c.:---- %_L./•••i/g .:.kt`..;;Sz„..;-.---lir-•-freZ-------. k a 5 (i) .. ''.",‘, .•\ ''' ,,,-,J'..'......- N.,..of.,.---....2 -. ' '--- ,e,,„/„<----N\---'I,A '-----" -------\ ---' ---------- C 4 I, , ' ...„,',..‘N2:1:'.‘ ,., ‘,..:,.!":::-—:-...- 4...:::,s').''' '''''\----\-\,..\,....\%:-...: -----r ' '''''''' ' }?-',...___---"1.,./j --' -- .. ,-•'--s,----------("" )f'-- -.-7.1,-,.......-. "<„:•----__.>....1. ,„iv" ____X .....„__________„"..n. ..„..., :../1,,,,,,- .....„...„, \,....,.„..\\....... a 7 .-...----------- ...---- .17. •- .• '"- .)11\411-mi,--- ,..--) .5—, (....) ---____ :--i--------- ---':- -----<---1-1-:16T -----------"" . — .......-- .... S • N. \ - .77j/.•" - -•••;:' > -: .---;>'- ...--! . , 3 2 -....1---- ----"' --` -------- ,i a '\, ----5;'"---..... ...,-;___"-:-..>-.-- -:----.----- ------ ---- ------ ------- --"" ..--- ... ----... __ , 0 RI 6 ...--- ,......- •----.'" 5 tr-ge PL-'cq0 ...-- .;--- _.-- _- .....- ....- w __...„ , ....,..• —1•••••-•,...7........................1...c'2' I-• ". X XL:1;6111 .'. ,- .-- - ,.-- --"- --- ___-- _ ...r -- _ . PLAN ......„ 2.;- - _ °i__ ----T--Y P LW AL EASN R4T-0R1.,MY£0 ROAD SECTION 1 2 O' - 8,139 January 12, 1993 OFFICE OF THE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION APPLICANT: COLIN QUINN The Bluffs File No.: R;SA-044-89 LOCATION: Between Lake Washington Boulevard North and I-405, east of Gene Coulon Memorial Beach Park SUMMARY OF REQUEST: The applicant has requested Contract Rezone from existing R-1 to R-3 (medium density) and Site Plan Approval to allow construction of a residential condominium complex consisting of six residential condominium buildings containing a total of 165 dwelling units, a recreation center and parking for 368 vehicles. The units are slated for sale to middle to upper income market. The site contains 22.6 acres, approximately 11.2 acres of which would be developed in buildings, parking, utilities, trails, drives, and re-landscaped open space. Approximately 11.4 acres or 51% of the site would be left as natural open space. Recreational amenities include a recreation center, swimming pool, pedestrian walkway system, public trail and natural open space. The proposal would incorporate design elements similar to the architecture in Gene Coulon Park. The proposed entrance driveway has been revised to a 24 foot wide drive with an internal turn-around for emergency vehicles. The revised access plan retains the secondary emergency access road at the north end of the site. SUMMARY OF ACTION: Development Services Recommendation: Approval with Conditions DEVELOPMENT SERVICES The Development Services Report was received by the REPORT: Examiner on December 8, 1992 PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Development Services Report, examining available information on file with the application, and field checking the property and surrounding area, the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: Colin Quinn R;SA-044-89 January 12, 1993 Page 2 MINUTES The hearing was opened on December 15, 1992, at 9:02 a.m. in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. The following exhibits were entered into the record: Exhibit #1 - Yellow File containing application, proof of posting and publication and other documentation pertinent to this request. Exhibit #2 - Vicinity Map Exhibit #3 - Legal Description Map Exhibit #4A & B - Site Plan Exhibit #5 - Landscape Plan Exhibit #6 - Rendered Perspective The hearing opened with a presentation of the staff report by PAUL FORSANDER, Senior Planner, who noted that the owner of record was Kirkman, Cooke, Lotto/Segur, Matsouka and Martindale. Existing zoning was R-1 (Single Family) and G-1..(General). The G-.1 designation on part of tax lot #350 where part of the entrance and part of the biofiltration pond would be located, was not included in this request for rezoning. Existing zoning in the area was G-1,. R-3, R-4, and B-1. The property was designated as commercial, green-belt, low density multi-family, high density multi-family. Access to the presently-undeveloped 22.6 acre site would be off Lake Washington Boulevard. Uses in the area included multi-family residential, mobile home park and single-family residential to the north, I-405 and single-family residential east, undeveloped and single-family to the south and Gene Coulon Memorial Beach Park to the west. The site was annexed to the City in 1959. The Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) was issued 2-6-91, with an Addendum and Mitigation Document on 10-8-92, with no appeals. Because the driveway slope was over 11%, approval was required by the Board of Public Works. There were adequate services in the area, but no public transit as the closest bus service was at 12th and Park. There was an existing 16" water main, dead ended north of the site at Marina Landing, which staff believed was adequate to serve the project. Existing 8" sewer mains at Coulon Park and at Marina Landing were considered adequate to serve the site. Storm water run off would be treated with detention and biofiltration before being released into existing ditches which connected to streams and ultimately entered Lake Washington. Special measures would be taken to control erosion impacts to streams during construction. The Examiner said he had some concerns with the location of the storm drainage system and the slopes on the site. Mr. Forsander requested that Neil Watts from Storm Drainage attend the hearing and noted that the location of biofiltration on the property could be accomplished. Off-site storm water flows were expected to be maintained at or below existing levels. The project was expected to generate 27 elementary and 27 junior and senior high school students who would attend Kennydale Elementary, 1 mile away, McKnight Middle School, 1 mile away, and Hazen High School, approximately 2 miles from the site. There would be an on-site population of almost 300 people and recreation facilities would include a rec center with a pool and a network of pedestrian trails. The project originally came in as a rezone and a PUD, but the applicant revised the proposal to a rezone with site plan approval. An addendum to the FEIS was issued to recognize the environmental impacts of the proposed change. Colin Quinn R;SA-044-89 January 12, 1993 Page 3 . Zoning would limit density to 10 units per acre while only 7.3 units per acre were proposed. The Examiner asked why the zoning wasn't being changed to R-2. Mr. Forsander replied that would not allow more than three attached dwelling units but the density of R-2 was acceptable. The Examiner asked whether there would be a draft agreement to lock up the property for this density. Mr. Forsander stated that had been suggested, and the agreement should be drafted before the proposal - - went to Council.. Regarding the G-1 parcel, it was desirable to have one zoning designation, and staff suggested the.Examiner-consider two alternatives in his rezone recommendation. The Examiner said the,first suggestion,was not,possible.because.there had been no legal notice on..that parcel and the City Council could always_rezone it. He asked how much acreage was involved. _.:Mr. Forsander replied that staff did not think the rezone was necessary to accomplish that portion of the project. The site plan ordinance gave the City authority to impose site planning and design conditions,and environmental measures as a permanent part of the permit. Because of the extensive grading and retaining walls that would have been necessary, the driveway access was modified to one 24-foot wide road with an internal turnaround for emergency vehicles instead of two 20-foot wide drives. There would be an emergency access road at the north end of the site which could be chained off but available as a secondary access and pedestrian connection. . Mr.-Forsander briefly reviewed rezone criteria, noting that the site was not specifically considered at the time of the last area land use analysis and zoning. The proposal was-generally consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and the Northeast Renton Plan. He-noted the environmental goal which was to establish and:maintain.a:harmonious-relationship:-between-the development and its natural environment, ,saying that 51% of the site was to be left:in its open, natural condition. The applicant was extending , the.necessary utilities to the site.at-no cost to the-City. The only, development on the slope was to-be the access road,-and there would-be no tree cutting-in the.natural areas except for the road. There would be an on-site water detention pond to allow settling of particulates and.an on-site car washing area with a system to trap oil/grease. .The applicants were required to have a:hydrological engineer'on site during major grading activities, and also must have a geotechnical engineer review design and be present during site preparation. The existing street system had adequate capacity to handle traffic generated by the proposal. Trees to be left on the site would obscure upland views of the buildings, which would have architecture echoing shapes at Coulon Park. The applicant would work with the Parks Department to make this property part of the trail system which might connect with a Parks Department planned use of an old railroad right-of-way. The site was suitable for development because it was vacant and located next to a major recreation amenity, Coulon Park. Buildings would have underground garages and all buildings would be sprinklered. In addition, the applicant had agreed to pay the fire mitigation fee, and to make improvements to Lake Washington Boulevard. No commercial uses were included in the proposal. Mr. Forsander said these would be owner-occupied condominium units. He then reviewed the criteria for site approval, noting the proposal would include 40% green belt, and complied with set back, lot coverage, and the 50-foot maximum height requirements. The Examiner noted that if developed for single-family residences, the density would be 8 dwelling units per acre. Because of the steepness of the site and the driveways needed, Mr. Forsander said that constructing single-family homes on this site would not leave 51% of the site as greenbelt. Site coverage allowed was 30% and the proposal would cover 21.8%. The four-story buildings were not oversized.and were located on the flatter parts of the site to avoid impacting the slopes and limit retaining wall construction. Parking was either under or behind the buildings and there would be no outside storage. The lighting around the buildings would be shielded by trees on the site, and the proposed buildings were adequately spaced for light and air. Mr. Forsander said the buildings were located on the flat parts of the site to avoid impacting the steep slopes and limit retaining wall construction. Paving has been reduced to only what was necessary in Colin Quinn R;SA-044-89 January 12, 1993 Page 4 order to reduce storm water run off, and planting areas would be shielded by curbs. The 165 new condominium units were felt to be an asset to area-wide property values. Vehicular and pedestrian traffic would be channelized and there would be some shared access with the adjoining Marina Landing Apartments. The Examiner said the residents of the lower buildings would want to use the rec center facilities and might take the shortest route to get there and would steps be provided to avoid people cutting.their own trails. He,felt a walkway was.needed. Mr. Forsander said that,was a good point but there was access for those people via the Lake Washington Boulevard entrance only, where the grade was 12% and no-unauthorized paths were wanted. He said it would be desirable to.connect the rec center with other upland buildings. .Internal circulation had,been designed for good access to fire and emergency vehicles and pedestrians with the exception of the access to the rec center by residents of the lower building, which might be accomplished by a'tram. There would be no loading or delivery areas. The proposal contained no activities that would produce noise or odor. -Presently, the site could be viewed as encouraging trash dumping and off-road bike use, and development would preempt such uses of the site. There would be site identification at two entrances and signs on each building. The applicant had not yet provided a signage plan for the buildings, which should be submitted prior to application for the building permit, and would meet City codes. The Fire Department had requested that the upper and lower portions of the site have separate addresses. Mr. Forsander then read staff recommendations as contained in the Preliminary Report, a copy of which, is a part of the permanent file. ..:Representing the,property.,owners, COLIN QUINN, 16031 119th PL NE, Bothell, WA 98011, noted'that the property..had,an excellent location;in terms of employment'opportunities in the-surrounding area at PACCAR and,Boeing.. Clustering the '165 units in six buildings-would'protect'the environmentally sensitive.,area and would provide attractive housing opportunities. The development would not abut :any existing single-family neighborhoods. He said he generally concurred with the staff-proposed . conditions, but reserved the right to comment on specific language later in-the hearing. The Examiner asked about storm water retention/detention and whether the plan was more than just conceptual at this point. He wanted to make sure the management of storm water was resolved at this stage of the proceedings. Mr. Quinn said his civil engineer could speak to that, but there was already a detention/retention facility located at the bottom of the hill on the east side of Lake Washington Boulevard in a flat portion of the property, which could be added into or, if the City preferred to have a biofiltration swale located out of the right-of-way, a parallel system could be created. The housing units ranged in size from 800 square feet to 1,800 square feet, encouraging a wide variety of the community that could live at The Bluffs. He noted that, regarding the rec facilities and their use by the owners at the bottom of the bluffs, the grade was significant, almost vertical in some places, and he did not think that could be scaled. Those residents would have to walk to the entrance and walk up the 12% grade roadway to utilize the facilities. While stairs could be a possibility, putting steps up into that area would present an environmental and engineering challenge. While that might be a shorter distance, climbing the several hundred stairs might be more of an effort than some could make. The Examiner asked what the distance from Building F to the entrance drive way and then back up to the recreational building would be. Mr. Forsander replied that the distance was at least 1,500 feet. The Examiner said that was almost a half mile to get to the building and he thought that kids and more athletic adults would probably open up natural trails. He thought that it might be possible to build a pathway. Mr. Quinn noted that if the engineers thought it was possible, they would'look at it. The primary access road would have a guard rail and existing vegetation, with the proposed walkway .on the east side of that roadway. They wanted to avoid providing pedestrian access to the more sensitive areas of the site. . ROY LEWIS, Dodds Engineers, 4205 148th AVE NE, Suite #200, Bellevue WA 98007, said the storm drainage could be taken care of on the site. The flatter portion of the site near the entrance could be utilized and the developer could do something like an ornamental wet pond with detention on the top 3 Colin Quinn R;SA-044-.89 January 12, 1993 Page 5 feet of it. Preliminary analysis showed that run off after development could be reduced to about half the run off prior to development, and the newer, King County Storm Water Design Manual standards were being used. The existing detention ditch was located in the City right-of-way, but there was plenty of space for an oversized pond in the front. The Examiner asked about deferring improvements along Lake Washington Boulevard.. Mr. Forsander replied that there was presently no design for planned road improvement on Lake Washington Boulevard. The applicant could make application for deferral. The.Examiner was concerned.that the.applicant might make use of the western boundary of the site for storm water storage and then the road improvements could cause it to.have to be moved. Mr. Forsander said they would.not allow anything that would be then taken out by roadway design. NEIL WATTS, Plan Review Supervisor, said he recommended that the applicant proceed with deferrals - .because they did not have the exact timing.and_configuration for_Lake..Washington Boulevard at this time, and present plans did not include acquiring extra right-of-way. The Examiner asked how conceptual was the storm drainage, and was the proposed plan practical for this site. Mr. Watts replied that he had reviewed plans that were well beyond the conceptual stage, although there was some flexibility on final design for the pond. He was convinced that there was plenty of room for storm drainage run off, and that the closed system would actually reduce the flows that were coming from the site now and should keep down erosion problems downstream. No erosion,problems-were presently being seen from this site, there would be no addition to erosion on this site, and most.upstream flows were diverted to.the-south,and did not enter the site. The drainage.would be allowed to stay the same for the north part of the,site. From where the buildings started onward, all drainage would-:be picked ;up, tight lined, would flow to the bottom for retention/detention, .and then eventually flow to the lake. The Examiner asked about water quality and maintenance. Mr. Watts replied that this-site.was close to Lake Washington and-the water quality must be protected. The-wet pond storage area-in conjunction with the biofiltration swale should be more than adequate to address any water quality. problems. -These systems always required some:maintenance.along with_maintenance:of.upstream catch basins. The Examiner asked whether residents would have to walk along the rough shoulder of the road if improvements along Lake Washington Boulevard were deferred. Mr. Watts said that creating a stairway would be a challenge as there was a 100 foot elevation change between the lower buildings and upper buildings, especially with the landslide problems that there had been in this area. Mr. Forsander said the applicant could be required to provide some way for residents to get to the upper buildings. WALT GRIESER, 2423 Garden Court N, Renton, WA 98056, said he wanted to know about the north end trail-and the emergency road, as he did not understand how they could get a fire truck through there and there was no place to turn around on the street. Mr. Quinn answered that the Fire Department currently had physical access to that area. Mr. Grieser asked for clarification that a fire truck could make the turn off of 24th, and wondered where the trail would go. Mr. Quinn said the emergency access was for secondary access only to be used to get them out, once the truck was in there, and this would offer a second alternative, should there be some blockage. He was unaware of any conditions in the neighborhood to which Mr. Grieser was referring that would prohibit fire access. The Examiner noted that the Fire Department was very strict about their requirements. Mr. Grieser asked whether they would have a gate there and would people go in there and dump trash. Regarding the proposed trails on the railroad right-of-way, the pedestrians would end up in his front yard. He was worried about traffic. He disagreed that there would be no impact from this proposal; there was always an impact. He stated that his experience on a planning commission left him with the impression that the City sometimes proposed projects and went around the rules. He said it looked like the City kind of pushed some of these big projects. The Examiner said he was available to see that did not occur, and he would take Mr. Grieser's concerns into consideration. PAULINE KIRKMAN, 1002 N 35th, Renton, WA 98056, said she also questioned the trail, saying she had a running battle with the Renton Parks Department about it since its inception because they had Colin Quinn R;SA-044-89 January 12, 1993 Page 6 called this the "abandoned railroad right-of-way". It was never abandoned, it was sold and had been private property since 1933. She did not feel that because it was vacant property, the Parks Department or anyone else had a right to its use. When a person paid taxes on a property, that person had the right of its use unless it was given away, which she had not done. She was also concerned about the_practicality of it, and questioned whether_there would be social trails going up through the site. She asked whether the street going up there would be private or a public right-of-way. It seemed excessive to be adding a trail that did not make any sense, as it would go from nowhere to.nowhere. If the Parks,Department wanted that property, they should ask for it. The Examiner explained that the access road was to be a private driveway, but the City had asked and .the.applicant-was.allowing the public access through for use as a trail. Mr. Quinn said that in some respects, he agreed with Ms. Kirkman, noting:that ,applicant was told that the City's park trail comprehensive plan indicated a trail crossing this property. The trail, as best as he could ascertain, did not start anywhere or go anywhere, but was following what was at one time an old railroad right-of-way. He believed that it made no sense but they were not unwilling to work with the Park Department, noting that the applicant had a choice to work with staff in the Park Department, understand the trail and perhaps,participate in its construction, or pay a mitigation fee. Responding to the comment that the City seemed to be pushing the project,:he noted-that this project had been in the works for over 13 -years and more than $300,000 had been spent on studying its various aspects. If the City was pushing this,project, .they were not pushing very.hard. ,He.said:the applicant would comply with the conditions, but:some,mitigations.were.prior to.construction,.some.during construction and some post construction. Mr. Quinn asked for'clarification on the notes to applicant regarding percentage.of.owner-occupied units, saying that deed restrictions could seriously.impair financing mechanisms of potential purchasers. The Examiner said that,note:was to make-sure thatno more than 1/3 or 1/4 were rented out at any one time and that could be made part of the agreement of the condominium association. Mr. Quinn stated that certain HUD financing and other vehicles became complicated when one was under a restriction such as this. He also had a problem with note #3 regarding covenants requiring establishment of a Homeowners Association. He would rather see wording to the effect that the applicant "shall establish a Homeowners Association'with the responsibility of maintenance" and then put all the maintenance responsibility into that. One thing they did not want to do was encumber deeds. By deed restriction, the unit purchaser became a member of the Homeowner's Association which would mandate the fee and what the homeowner's responsibility was. He, would prefer that these details be spelled out in the Homeowners Association documents. The Examiner said the problem with that was the homeowners could immediately meet and negate any conditions the'City may have imposed. Mr. Quinn said he had not thought of that and he would trust the Examiner's judgement but he was looking to minimize encumbrances to title that might affect either the buyers or sellers ability to finance or purchase. He thought police service charges' historically were imposed on apartment buildings versus condos and he felt that this requirement was less applicable on this development. The applicant might be willing to do analysis to see if any impact had been created, but didn't believe this condition, as proposed, was applicable to The Bluffs. The Examiner said it sounded like the applicant had agreed'to enter into this voluntary agreement. Mr. Quinn replied that the applicant was trying to cooperate with the City to move ahead with this project, but had not seen that it was voluntary but, rather, was a condition asked for from the Police Department. Mr. Forsander said it was discussed that staff was likely to impose this, however, staff could work with applicant and revise the language to say the applicant would pay reimbursement if there were costs for police service. Regarding the phasing requirement, Mr. Quinn said he understood staff's concern about site preparation being.completed prior to issuance of a building permit. Mr. Forsander said that was dropped and staff was asking for a phasing plan. Mr..Quinn said currently the applicant's feeling was that it would all be Colin Quinn R;SA-044-89 January 12, 1993 Page 7 built simultaneously, but finance questions might alter that. The Examiner asked about clearing the land and never building. Mr. Quinn said he felt that the City would be imposing conditions with the clearing and.grading permit that once the site disturbance had occurred, the site would be re-vegetated within a certain time, if nothing else occurred. Regarding the pedestrian walkway'at the entrance - drive, the applicant was proposing to run the side walk parallel to the roadway up.the hill. Making that a,separate sidewalk would be,twice the cost, but the applicant would;work with the City to establish what kind,of curbing would be appropriate,' however,_making it a separate,sidewalk didn't . . make economic sense. In trying to provide a.project that people could afford, they-were looking to save,money whenever possible and the mitigation fees alone wereover-.$250,000. The Examiner asked -whether the sidewalk or separate pathway was part of the 24 feet or an addition. Mr. Quinn stated it was in addition.to the 24 feet.of_driving surface and then there would.be:some type of barrier, and - then the-pedestrian walk. -He.noted:the Examiner.had 'a valid concern.about•access to the rec facility by the units below. His architect had just pointed out to him that there might be places within the hillside that would be feasible for creating some kind of access. Probably under the current scenario, the most likely way to go up there would be to drive. A tram did not make economic sense and neither did providing some type of a golf cart. The applicant would work with staff to resolve that issue. Also, as part of the sales, the applicant would make,sure..that those,people who.purchased units at the bottom were made aware of the location of the rec center. :.GARY GOTTI, Fire:Marshal,..had..worked-closely with,the architect and staff,to find solutions to - providing emergency,access for this project, which included a 24-foot'drive,from Lake'Washington .Boulevard,on,the;south=and. a 20-foot road access.to the north from the top of the site. He advised . -that when:it came;to access for:•the'Fire Department, the requirements of•:the code were enforced. The . owners-had demonstrated.that the,requirements of the code regarding access, grade, and turning had been.met,.and'theFire Department had no problem with this project. The Examiner asked for an additional two weeks to issue his report and there was no objection: The Examiner called for further testimony regarding this project. There was no one else wishing to speak, and no further comments from staff. The hearing closed at 10:52 a.m. FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & DECISION: Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: \r 1. The applicant, Colin Quinn, filed a request.for approval of a rezone and site plan to develop 1`65 dwelling units on an approximately 22.6 acre site. 2. The yellow file containing the staff report, the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) documentation and other pertinent materials was entered into the record as Exhibit #1. 3. The Environmental Review Committee (ERC), the City's responsible official, determined that an EIS was required for the proposal and one was prepared. 4. The subject proposal was reviewed 'by all departments with an interest in the matter. 5. The subject site is located on the east side of Lake Washington Boulevard between the 1400 block and 2000 block of Lake Washington Boulevard North. Coulon Park,is located west of the site, across Lake Washington Boulevard. Colin Quinn R;SA-044-89 January 12, 1993 Page 8 6. The subject site was annexed to the City with the adoption of Ordinance #1791, enacted in September of 1959. The site has maintained a single-family zoning category since annexation. The site is currently zoned R-1 (Single Family; Lot size - 7,200 sq ft). 7. The map element of the Comprehensive Plan designates the area in which the subject site is ;located as suitable for the development of a mixture of uses including commercial uses at the -:southern end of the site and a mix-of low and.high density.multiple-family development and greenbelt on the majority of the.site, .but does not.mandate such.development without consideration of-other policies of the Plan. 8. The applicant originally applied for a.rezone and a PUD (Planned Unit Development) but as the .environmental studies were conducted;,the'proposal was-modified-.to consist of'a contract rezon and a site plan approval. In addition, while the Comprehensive Plan was being updated, the City Council imposed a moratorium on rezoning property. . The moratorium was intended to avoid potential rezones that might eventually conflict with the evolving new Comprehensive Plan. At the same time, the Council exempted 10 proposals, including the proposal to redevelop the subject site, that were in advanced stages of preparation. That,exemption.required a - contract rezone-to eliminate speculative-rezones and to limit;the range'of_alternatives, and lock in both a rezone and the actual proposal. 9. '-. -The-subject,site-is-an-irregularly shaped parcel:of-approximately;22.6-acres.' ;The parcel is .. -located on the,upward sloping property situated on the:east:side of'-Lake.Washington Boulevard.The site is approximately:1,500 feet long- by:approximately.600 feet deep. A narrow neck of land-connects a northern.segment with the.main;southern segment. -In'addition, a-separately -owned parcel immediately south of.N 20th Street buffers a portion of the site from Lake Washington Boulevard. -The•I-405 right-of-way forms the eastern.or-up slope boundary of the site. 10. The site has severe topographic constraints that make portions of the site generally unsuitable for development. The applicant has therefore, proposed to concentrate development on the more gentle slopes and terraces found along the upper eastern edge of the site and along the central portion of the western edge. The applicant would leave other portions of the site, including much of the northern, almost separate parcel; undeveloped except for both access driveways and an emergency access road. The development including buildings, parking areas, driveways, lawn areas, and trail would cover approximately 11.2 acres. The remaining approximately 11.4 acres of the site would be retained in natural vegetation. 11. The site is sandwiched between I-405 and Lake Washington Boulevard/Coulon Park on the east and west, respectively. North of .the site is a multiple-family complex, a mobile home park, and single-family uses. South of the site are undeveloped parcels and single-family uses. 12. Utility service is provided by the City of Renton. 13. The site is served by the Renton School District. The proposal is expected to generate approximately 54 students spread over grades 1 through 12. The school system reports that the additional student load can be accommodated. School assignments are a function of capacity and location. 14. The proposed complex will consist of Residential Buildings A, B, D, E and F developed in two main groupings, as well as Building C, the recreation center, and a swimming pool. Colin Quinn R;SA-044-89 January 12, 1993 Page 9 15. The upper tier of development will contain all of the buildings except Building F. Building A will be the southernmost building and will be a backwards L-shaped building. The long leg of the L will run north-south and be approximately'209 feet long. The other leg will be approximately 157 feet long. A victorian-type tower will be located at the junction of the two legs. 16. Building A.will be approximately 70 feet tall at.its tallest relief and'approximately 60 tall along its western facade which varies from 5 to 6 stories. The building contains 57,200 square feet. ,Its ground floor elevation is 174 feet. It contains 39 one, two and three bedroom units. 17. Building B is approximately 50 feet tall, or 4 stories. The building is approximately 116 feet long (east-west axis) and•49 feet deep. The building contains 16 units. It is approximately 19,200 square feet and has a ground floor elevation of 174 feet. 18. The recreation building, Building C, is an approximately 20-feet tall, 1-story building. The recreation building is 2,900 square feet. Its elevation is 160 feet. 19. Building D, like Building A, is an L-shaped building with similar dimensions. The building varies between 50 and 60 feet tall and is 4 stories over parking. The building has 46 units, approximately 63,200 square feet, and elevation of 169 feet: 20. Buildings E and F=each consist of side-by-side mirror image.couplets. Both sets of buildings are 36,000.square feet and both contain 32 units. The Building E couplets are each 2 stories in the rear and 4 on the west. They.are both approximately 50 feet tall. The ground floor elevation is 163 feet. 21. While similar to Building E's couplets, building F's are each 3 stories on the east and 4 on the west. The ground floor elevation is 60.5 feet. 22. All of the buildings, except Building F, are accessed by the same driveway that climbs up the slope from the southwest corner of the site. The Board of Public Works has approved a variance for a driveway that has an 11% grade which is in excess of standard requirements. The driveway continues along the east side of the site until reaching the north third of the site where a sharp curve takes it to the property line and connects with Garden Avenue N. This northerly extension provides approved emergency access according to the Fire Department. 23. Building F is accessed from a separate driveway located south of N 20th Street. Building F is situated about 200 feet from Lake Washington Boulevard. The linear distance between Building F and the recreation building is approximately a half mile between the driveway, Lake Washington Boulevard, and the curving steep driveway. 24. The applicant has attempted to echo the architectural details of the structures located at Coulon Park. The buildings will have peaked roofs, gables, articulated walls and will be stepped into the slopes with the eastern facades generally lower than the western or view facades. 25. In addition, as the different ground floor elevations reflect, the buildings themselves step up and down the sloping topography. 26. The site's elevation runs from Lake Washington Boulevard, an elevation of approximately 50 feet, to an elevation of approximately 150 to 170 feet at the terrace where the upper tier of • Colin Quinn R;SA-044-89 January 12, 1993 Page 10 buildings would be located. The site has some localized slopes that approach an elevation of approximately 200 feet. 27. As indicated above, Building F would be at an elevation of approximately 60 feet. The recreational building is at an elevation of approximately 160 feet: Other than using Lake Washington Boulevard and the access driveway, no path connects Building F to the rest of the complex. 28. - One of the-property owners noted that, in the absence of?established trails, people tend to create their own social trails even on steeper hillsides, particularly if doing so will eliminate a circuitous route between points. That observation is matched by observations that such trails are routinely "created" through:vacant lots, steep slopes, and:open spaces. 29. There are at least two topographic areas where more gentle slopes can provide a route for a trail or staircase or combination of both. While such a trail might not be for the faint of heart, it would provide a much shorter route between the upper complex and Building F and even Lake Washington Boulevard. Frankly, the driveway access, while more gentle, will not be significantly easier to negotiate and will be less appealing to.those not interested-in the long approach route. The applicant's architect indicated that the terrain could probably accommodate such a staircase or trail. 30. ..The, applicant.--has indicated that no improvements.-would be provided-along Lake.Washington Boulevard and that a deferral of curbs, gutters, and sidewalks is anticipated since alignment issues for that roadway are not adequately defined. This would require residents to negotiate an unimproved shoulder along Lake Washington Blvd to access Building F or to walk anywhere, particularly-Coulon Park, from the complex. 31. The applicant proposes creating a pedestrian path along the side of the access roadway from Lake Washington Blvd to Building A. The pathway would be at street grade although the applicant offered to segregate it with some form of curbing to provide additional delineation. From Building A, a more informal path would be provided along the east edge of the complex until Building D where it would then cross and meander to the west of Building E. The path would continue along the emergency,access road to the northeast corner of the complex. This path would allow pedestrians to circulate into the neighborhoods north and east of the complex. 32. The applicant proposes 338 parking stalls divided between carports (48), garages (136), and open stalls (154), whereas only 319 stalls are required. The additional parking is intended for guest parking since street parking is limited or unavailable. 33. The access driveway will be 24 feet wide to accommodate expedited turning movements from Lake Washington Blvd into the complex. The slope of the driveway will be approximately a 12 percent grade. 34. Staff has recommended that a small parcel that was inadvertently omitted from the rezone proposal be included in the rezone. Since the site was not included in the appropriate legal notice, this office has no jurisdiction over it. The City Council can include it in any comprehensive zoning review conducted in conjunction the new Comprehensive Plan. 35. Marina Landing Apartments were constructed north of the site within the last five years. PACCAR has also been redeveloping its property south of the site. Colin Quinn R;SA-044-89 January 12, 1993 Page 11 36. The subject site is covered by secondary growth, predominantly deciduous forest. The site contains no endangered or unique species. Development of the site will, however, displace a variety of animal species. 37. The development of the site will increase the storm water runoff potential of the subject site approximately 167 percent. Runoff will meet the City's standards in terms of both quantity and quality. The storm water will be collected and run through a filtration system before being released to Lake Washington. The detention pond will be located near the southwest corner of the site, adjacent to the intersection of the entrance drive.and Lake Washington.Blvd., The applicant will provide oil/grease traps along the access drive as well as.silt sumps. The site will have a car wash area to further limit the potential for contaminants entering Lake--Washington. 38. The applicant will do all grading under supervision (ERC condition) since the erosion potential of the steep slopes will require special precautions. Development will require removal of approximately 81,000 cubic yards of soil. Approximately 60,000 cubic yards will be redistributed to create building pads, parking areas, and roadway surfaces. 39. The applicant may accommodate portions of a public trail,through portions of:the subject site, since the Comprehensive Plan designates this area as suitable for one of the City's trails. The applicant does note that the old rail right-of-way is now private property. 40. Development of the subject site will generate'between 1,300 and .1,400•vehicle trips per day. Of this amount, approximately,100 peak hour trips will be.generated. .Staff:has indicated that the area roads can support this additional traffic. 41. The 165 dwelling units will amount to approximately 7.3 dwelling units per acre over the entire site. The proposed R-3 zoning would permit approximately 25 units per acre whereas R-2 (Duplex Residential) would permit approximately-10 units'per acre. In contrast, R-1 Single- Family zoning would permit 6 to 8 dwelling units per acre. 42. The buildings are located on the site to provide extensive setbacks from one another and from the carports and garages. The two smallest setbacks are the 9=foot setback between Building D and the adjacent property, and the 10-foot setbacks of the Building F couplet, again from adjacent property. The irregular nature of the parcel's shape make a determination of yard setbacks almost irrelevant. CONCLUSIONS CONTRACT REZONE 1. The proponent of a rezone must demonstrate that the request is in the public interest, that it will not impair the public health, safety, and welfare, and in addition, complies with at least one of the criteria found in Section 4-8-14, which provides in part that a. The subject site has not been considered in a previous area-wide rezone or land use analysis; or b. The subject site is potentially designated for the new classification per the Comprehensive Plan; or c. There has been a material and substantial change in the area'in which the subject site is located since the last rezoning of the property or area. Colin Quinn R;SA-044-89 January 12, 1993 Page 12 The requested classification is justified and should be approved by the City Council. 2. The subject site has not been considered for residential development since the last area-wide analysis that covered this area. 3. . While the. map element Comprehensive Plan appears to divide the subject site into commercial, varying levels of residential density, and greenbelt, it is apparent that the proposed use complies with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan. The proposed contract rezone would provide an overall density not unlike that of single-family'neighborhoods while maintaining the steep slopes found on about half the site. 4. A commercial designation would create a small isolated pocket of commercial zoning surrounded by residential uses. Such an island could adversely affect residential values and is probably inappropriate given the general development in the area. It appears that the development of residential uses would provide an additional opportunity to live in the City, in an area close to employment opportunities and in an area where appropriate infrastructure is both available and adequate. 6. As indicated above, a number of developments have changed the area including developments both north (Marina Landing) and south (PACCAR and Boeing enhancements), creating a pocket of.•undeveloped property. These changes, along with the relatively recent expansion of Coulon Park,'demonstrate considerable changes in the area. 7. Finally, it appears that the timing is appropriate to develop this parcel of property. It makes sense to develop this parcel at this time since services are available and the property north of it is already developed. SITE APPROVAL 8. The site plan ordinance provides a number of specific criteria for reviewing a site plan. Those criteria are generally represented, in part, by the following enumeration: a. Conformance with the Comprehensive Plan; b. Conformance with the Building and Zoning Codes; c. Mitigation of impacts on surrounding properties and uses; d. Mitigation of the impacts of the proposal on the subject site itself; e. Conservation of property values; f. Provision for safe and efficient vehicle and pedestrian circulation; g. Provision of adequate light and air; h. Adequacy of public services to accommodate the proposed use; The proposed use, with some exceptions, satisfies these and other particulars of the ordinance. Colin Quinn -N R;SA-044-89 January 12, 1993 Page 13 9. Again, while the Comprehensive Plan's map element has a variety of designations for the site, the applicant's proposal would appear to roll all of them except the commercial designation into the proposed site plan. The proposal would concentrate the density on the more gentle terraces thereby preserving extensive acreage as open space and greenbelt. This complies with both the residential and open space goals of the Comprehensive Plan. 10. As discussed in the rezone criteria above, the proposal complies with many of the subsidiary r goals and policies including open space, expanding the residential choices,for residents,-creating interesting, varied buildings that blend with their surroundings, creating housing near employment opportunities, and doing so in a timely fashion. 11. It would appear that the proposal conforms to the Building and.Zoning Codes as well as the Fire Code. Specific compliance will be determined with the submission of the building permit application. The proposal meets the setback, lot area, density, and parking requirements of the R-3 zone. The proposal also meets the height limitations of the zone, although one of the buildings will be taller than others in the area. While the topography may mask some of this height, it will definitely dominate the area as it is situated high up on the bluff. Of course, it is this prominent position that the applicant is taking advantage of to provide-extensive views • from the proposed buildings. The absolute minimum setbacks provided between Building D and the Building F couplet and adjacent property should be expanded. An approximately 50 foot tall building should be more than 9 (nine) feet from a property line since.it will loom over its western neighbor. The slope differential will increase the adverse affects of this:scale and lack of adequate-setback.--.Similarly, the 10-foot-setback between Building F.and:the-.western property line is insufficient to buffer the property from a 3 to 4.story facade. These setbacks should be increased to not less than 25 feet. 12. The proposed density of approximately 8 dwelling units per acre, coupled with the aesthetic design features, should avoid creating any undue impacts on surrounding properties and uses. There is no escaping the fact that new development coupled with the many new residents, traffic, noise, and other impacts will be noticeable. Those consequences were generally considered when the Comprehensive Plan for this area was adopted. But, again, the proposed development is designed to minimize these impacts. There are extensive setbacks, as much as 200 feet in some cases, and there is the topographical relief that pretty well isolates the site from the up-slope single-family uses. As indicated above, the applicant should increase the setbacks to not less than 25 feet from any adjacent property for any structure over one story in height to lessen the apparent bulk and scale. The applicant will also have a program to reduce reliance on single-family cars, although the site is not currently served by Metro. 13. The applicant has designed the proposal to work with and around the steep slopes. The buildings are cut into the hillside and located on the more gentle aspects of the site. While the access road will require substantial grading, the narrowed width will minimize excess cutting. The buildings are well spaced apart from one another and definitely take advantage of the slopes to provide views from the buildings. The major unavoidable slope influence that can't be easily eliminated is that the steep slopes make pedestrian movements on and off the site more difficult. Building F is so isolated from the main complex that it might as well be a separate project. It is separated by a roadway distance of approximately one-quarter to one-half mile and an elevation gain of almost 100 feet. Similarly, the main complex is so significantly removed from the street by distance and elevation that residents might feel compelled to drive everywhere. Added to this, the applicant does not propose linking Building F to the.main complex by other than the existing shoulder of Lake Washington Boulevard and the entry driveway. The applicant proposes delaying any improvements along Lake Washington Colin Quinn .. R;SA-044-89 January 12, 1993 Page 14 Boulevard, leaving residents to walk along the shoulder of that roadway. A, review of the record indicates that there are at least two locations where the applicant could construct a stairway and pathway to link the upper portion of the site with the lower portion of the site, and the-applicant had-agreed that there might be places within the hillside that.would be feasible for creating some kind of access. As indicated at the hearing, similar methods have been utilized to provide shorter routes for those who like the challenge and for those who would _ otherwise create their own social paths, even across very steep slopes. Therefore, the applicant shall construct two "trail" systems of paths, ramps and steps one of which shall link Building F with Building E and one of which shall link Building A with Lake Washington Boulevard. 14. _ In addition, the applicant's proposed at-grade walkway along:the edge of the access driveway is _ ;inappropriate. -Both the site;plan ordinance and the..Comprehensive:Plan:require.safe,pedestrian access. On this curving and steep access roadway, the best method of achieving such safety is providing a typical sidewalk arrangement with straight curbs and raised sidewalks. 15. Similarly, if the plans for the alignment or needed improvements along Lake Washington Boulevard are still too speculative, then the applicant shall create a raised sidewalk along the property's Lake Washington frontage and extending as far north as the.access.driveway for Building F. This sidewalk can be located either on the edge of the private,property in this location or on the public right-of-way. Even if these improvements must:be removed at some .later date, the safety of.,pedestrians who will-be walking to and from the,main complex as well as-.to-and,from adjacent Coulon-park,':cannot be left to,an irregular,shoulder,along Lake Washington..Boulevard.. 16. The development of the-subject:site-should not adversely affect property values. The development.of the,subject site will, obviously,.have a positive affect on-its property-values and the limited impacts of this development on adjacent properties should minimize any negative impacts, although as indicated, it will change the nature of the area a bit more as did Marina Landing. 17. As indicated above, the need for more,and better pedestrian amenities cannot be minimized. There will be 50 students attending school from this site and, no doubt, frequenting Coulon Park. There will also be the other residents. The need for convenient and safe sidewalks is demonstrated, as is the need to link the upper complex with both the lower complex and Lake Washington Boulevard. With the addition of the raised sidewalks, the remainder of the access appears to provide the mandated safe and efficient vehicle and pedestrian circulation patterns. 18. The slopes, together with building placement and the "open space" provided by I-405 and Lake Washington, assure the site of adequate light and air. 19. The site is served by adequate City services. The applicant will be meeting the City's latest storm drainage requirements and storm water quality will be assured before it is released- into Lake Washington. The site has two access points that meet the Fire Department's needs. 20. The applicant will be providing some on-site recreation and has offered to negotiate for a trail access or easement that might run through the site. If such agreements are not reached, the applicant shall contribute monies to the Parks and Recreation fund to provide and maintain an adequate level of recreation. The fee has been identified as $180.00 per unit. 21. As indicated, the proposal will be both disrupting and preserving about 50 percent of the vegetation and slopes on the site. Development of property with slopes such as those found on Colin Quinn R;SA-044-89 January 12, 1993 Page 15 this site cannot occur without the loss of some vegetation. The proposal appears to provide a reasonable tradeoff. It provides a well-landscaped locale for multiple-family housing and one with incredible view potentials. Again, the scale of the buildings will be larger than most in the area and the prominence of their location high on the bluff will not diminish that aspect, but all in all, the proposal appears reasonable. 22.. In conclusion, as a contract rezone governed by the site plan that will guide the site's development, the proposal should be approved. RECOMMENDATION: The City Council should approve the proposed reclassification of the subject site from R-1 to R-3 subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant shall execute a contract with the City of Renton that binds the applicant to construct the project according to the Site Plan which is approved herein and subject to all the conditions found below. 2. The applicant shall execute covenants running with.the land that establish.the maximum overall project density of no more than 7.3 condominium dwelling units per acre; and the overall project height at 50 feet. 3. The.applicant;shall execute covenants that establish homeowners' rules that prohibit more than 25% of the units from being rented at any one time. The agreement may provide a revolving pool which owners may enter if they wish to rent units or other such arrangement that accomplishes this purpose. 4. The applicant shall comply with all conditions found in the Mitigation Document established by the Environmental Review Committee and published on October 9, 1992. The applicant shall comply with all of the conditions that are determined by the City to be necessary prior to the issuance of any Construction, Grading License, or Building Permits. 5. The applicant shall abide by all Site Plan Approval Conditions listed below. DECISION: The Site Plan is approved subject to the following conditions: 6. The applicant shall comply with all conditions found in the Mitigation Document established by the Environmental Review Committee and published on October 9, 1992. The applicant shall comply with all of the conditions that are determined by the City to be necessary prior to the issuance of any Construction, Grading License, or Building Permits. 7. Greenbelt/Steep Slope Covenants: The applicant shall execute covenants running with the land that set aside and protect all undisturbed steep slope/greenbelt areas. These areas are to remain in their natural state except for trails which may be located through the area. The covenants shall be approved by the Development Services Division and City Attorney prior to the issuance of any Construction or Building Permits. F.` -C-- Colin Quinn ' R;SA-044-89 January 12, 1993 Page 16 8. Landscape Maintenance Covenants: The applicant shall execute covenants running with the land acknowledging this and future owner's responsibilities for maintaining the new on-site landscaping and other improvements on the site in accordance with accepted landscape, principals. The covenant shall require the land owner to agree to replace any and all new landscaping that has died or been so severely damaged through improper maintenance (e.g. improper or excessive pruning) as to destroy or significantly reduce the original intent. The landscaping'covenant:shall be approved'by the Development Services Division-and City Attorney prior-to the issuance of a Building-Permit. 9. - Landscaping Surety Device: The applicant shall post a,surety;device,:to:-be.approved-by the Development:Services Division for maintenance and;,plant replacement-of all site landscaping to cover,a-three (3) year.period. Evidence-of-the,,surety.,device-is,required prior to the issuance of a Building Permit. 10. The applicant, shall execute covenants that assure that all of the residents of all the buildings, including Building F, shall be entitled to freely use all the recreational amenities that are provided and constructed as a result of this approval including the pool and recreational complex in Building C. 11. The:applicant shall construct a raised:standard .sidewalk,that:parallels,the access driveway-.and which°runs from:Lake:Washington:-,Boulevard-to the southwest corner of Building,A. . .All.other. Buildings of.the upper terrace-shall be,linked by. pathways •'subject_to_the_approval of,the City. _.Allsidewalks::and:pathways:.shall,be,:constructed by the-applicant.and-approved,by the City prior.,to.the issuance:of.an•occupancy ,permit. 12. , . ;The applicant shall-construct and shall'not defer:or otherwise eliminate a.sidewalk along Lake Washington Boulevard that runs from the south boundary line of the site to the intersection of the intersection of N 20th (as extended). The sidewalk shall be constructed by the applicant and approved by the City prior to the issuance of an occupancy permit. 13. The applicant shall construct at least two separate hill climbs that may consist of any combination of stairs, paths and sloping ramps and at least one of which shall connect, as practical as possible, Building F with Building E and the second of which shall connect the upper terrace in the vicinity of Buildings A, C or D and Lake Washington Boulevard. 14. Facilities Maintenance: In order to ensure the maintenance and upkeep of residential building exteriors and common community facilities, the applicant is required to: a) Establish a condominium homeowners association for the continual maintenance of the site facilities (e.g. landscaping, roads, utilities), common facilities (recreation, lobbies, etc.) and residential building exteriors. b) Establish covenants on the land, as well as on each condominium deed requiring ' on-going maintenance of the facilities described in "a", above, as well as participation in the condominium homeowners association. 15. On-Site Recreation: In order to address demand for on-site private recreation facilities, the applicant is required to construct the proposed recreation center, swimming pool, and pedestrian walkways. Colin Quinn R;SA-044-89 January 12, 1993 Page 17 16. Off-Site Recreation Demand: The applicant shall either provide an easement across the subject site to accommodate a public path that is identified in the City's Trail Master Plan in this general location or pay an off-site Park Mitigation Fee of $180 per multi- family unit. 17. Street Cleaning Surety Device During Construction: The,applicant shall post a,surety device, to be.approved:by the Transportation Systems Division for street;cleaning during •the construction,phase of the,project.::':Evidence,of.the surety,.device,is:required prior to the issuance of a Building Permit. 18. The applicant shall install signs at all entrance points and signs:that clear1y identify buildings. 19. Project Phasing: If the applicant chooses to phase the project, the applicant shall use the following schedule subject to approval of the City: 1) All.site.Preparation (site grading, utilities, and:roads) shall be the first%phase; 2). .. Site.Preparation for all portions.of the site:shall be:completed prior to issuance of any Building Permits. 20......<Storm-Drainage.& Treatment System Construction: The The.applicant.shall comply:with:code and-appropriately locate the storm.water system entirely on the subject site. 21., The applicant shall retain a qualified geotechnical consultant and a qualified hydraulics engineer to work with the applicant's civil engineering consultant to provide recommendations concerning the engineering and design of roadways, utilities, retaining walls, drainage, and foundation systems. The geotechnical consultant shall review and sign off on the project construction drawings prior to the issuance of any construction or building permits. All such work shall be approved by the City. 22. The applicant shall post a bond or provide other assurances, approved by the City Attorney, to restore the site to its natural condition if development of the site is terminated after any grading or vegetation removal has occurred. ORDERED THIS 12th day of January, 1993. Ya u y FRED J. KA AN HEARING E MINER TRANSMITTED THIS 12th day of January, 1993,, to the parties of record: Paul Forsander Senior Planner Colin Quinn R;SA-044-89 January 12, 1993 Page 18 Colin Quinn 16031 119th PL NE Bothell, WA 98011 Roy Lewis Dodds Engineers 4205 148th AVE NE, Suite #200 Bellevue, WA 98007 Neil Watts Plan Review Supervisor Walt Grieser 2423 Garden Court N Renton, WA 98056 Pauline Kirkman 1002 N 35th St Renton, WA 98056 Gary Gotti Fire Marshal The Ferris Company Key Bank Bldg, Suite 506 10655 NE 4th St Bellevue, WA 98004 Darrell Igelmund President North Renton/Kennydale Neighborhood Defense Fund 3602 Lake Washington BLVD N Renton, WA 98056 Joanne Stewart 3233 Mtn. AVE N Renton, WA 98056 Stuart Dooley 2003 NE 16th Renton, WA 98056 Darryl Smith 1733 Jones AVE NE Renton, WA 98056 Jane Tobin 7662 S 135th Seattle, WA 98178 Colin Quinn R;SA-044-89 January 12, 1993 Page 19 Jack Leach. 622 S 320th Federal Way, WA 98003 Chan Betts 1014 N 30th Renton, WA 98056 Bill Heath 308 Stevens AVE SW_ Renton, WA 98055 Alan Bateman 1266 North Bend BLVD North Bend, WA 98045 Lenard J. Milbrandt 11715 SE 5th St, Suite 100 Bellevue, WA•98005 TRANSMITTED THIS 12th day of January, 1993, to the following: Mayor Earl Clymer Councilman.Richard M. Stredicke Don Erickson, Zoning Administrator Lynn A. Guttmann, Administrator Members, Renton Planning Commission Jim Hanson, Development.Services Manager Gary Gotti, Fire Marshal James Chandler, Building Official Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Jay Covington, Mayor's Executive Assistant Transportation Systems Division Valley Daily News Utilities System Division Pursuant to Title IV, Chapter 8, Section 15 of the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 p.m. January 26, 1993. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is ambiguous or based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for a review by the Examiner within fourteen (14) days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific ambiguities or errors discovered by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record, take further action as he deems proper. An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Chapter 8, Section 16, which requires that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk, accompanying a filing fee of $75.00 and meeting other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection or purchase in the Finance Department, first floor of City Hall. The Appearance of Fairness Doctrine provides that no ex parte (private one-on-one) communications may occur concerning pending land use decisions. This means that parties to a land use decision may not communicate in private with any decision-maker concerning the proposal. Decision-makers in the land use process include both the Hearing Examiner and members of the City Council. All communications concerning the proposal must be made in public. This public communication permits all interested parties to know the contents of the communication and would allow them to 3 >Cf =O «RENT .N< E NGE• MN — A'G E'N Did►> >` < > >'` >>>< < < ><< '>>< `<> <> <> >< COIN:..l HQ► ..BE SECONI00R, R 0.. . 1VIUNl L ►L Q�UILD...G... . .:...:.. ;.:. hich.. :.ea:r: :lte s wil :e caf a :for>p:40:. : t<t a iscref. :.. :..f �.:h..:a.d, . m.::.:...:1.bp.:ca..1:.:�:::.:.:h:.:..:.:.::. :a.::h:.:d . ...:.fan: PROJECT NAME: The Bluffs PROJECT NUMBER: ECF;R;SA-044-89 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Contract Rezone and Site Plan Approval to allow construction of a residential condominium complex consisting of six residential condominium buildings containing a total of 165 dwelling units, a recreation center and parking for 368 vehicles. The units are slated for sale to middle to upper income market. The site contains 22.6 acres and approximately 11.2. acres would be developed in buildings, parking, utilities, trails and drives and re-landscaped open space. Approximately 11.4 acres or 51 percent of the site would be left as natural open space. Recreational amenities include a recreation center, swimming pool, pedestrian walkway system, public trail and natural open space. The proposal would incorporate design elements similar to the architecture in Gene Coulon Park, providing a synergistic relationship between the complex and the nearby park. The proposed entrance driveway has been revised to provide 24 foot wide with an internal turnaround for emergency vehicles. The revised access plan retains the secondary emergency access road at the north end of the site. The project is located between Lake Washington Boulevard North and 1-405, east of Gene Coulon Memorial Beach Park. • hexagnda Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner _ REZONE&SITE PLAN API' 4L FOR THE BLUFFS ECF;R;SA-044-89 PUBLIC HEARING: December 15, 1992 Page 25 d) Dry standpipes in fire stairs for buildings with garages (buildings "A" &""D"); e) All buildings to be sprinklered because of the driveway variance (exceeds 8%); f) Chains or gates to be installed at each end of the secondary/emergency access road. Note, bollards may be permitted subject to the applicant providing evidence of a suitable design that would not freeze in place of the bollards and impair Fire Department access; and, g) The upper and lower portions of the project shall have separate addresses to aid in location during emergencies. 5. Recyclables Storage and Collection Areas: The applicant is required to revise the proposal to include areas for deposit and storage_ of recyclables generated by residents of the community, consistent with the City's recently adopted Garbage Code Amendment. The recyclables plan is to be approved by the Development Services Division prior to the issuance of a Building Permit. 6. Special Utility Connection Charges: .The following Special Utility Connection Charges for water, sewer and drainage must be paid prior to the issuance of Building Permits. These fees are estimated to be: $89,925 for water, $44,550 for sewer and $31,340 for surface water(drainage). 7. Storm Drainage & Treatment System Construction: The applicant is required,by code to revised the design of the storm water detention pond to locate the facility on the applicant's property, and not on city right-of-way, as proposed. The pond design must also be revised to allow settling of particulants and provide further water quality enhancement by providing an on-site grassy swale at the pond outfall for biofiltration. The revised design shall be approved by the Development Services Division, prior to the issuance of a Building Permit. 8. On-Site Public Trail Facilities: With reference to Condition No. 7, Off-Site Recreation Demand, the Parks Department is interested in working with the applicant to insure that the applicant's proposed north/south trail be developed for public use and provide suitable connections to the department's proposed future Pacific Railroad Trail (See section VIII-2 through VIII-14, Comprehensive Park Plan). If the applicant desires to provide public trail access in-lieu of providing the Parks Comprehensive Plan Mitigation Fee, then the following would be required: a) Dedication to the City of Renton of a permanent public trail access easement to allow public • over the entire length of the trail on the project site; b) Construction of the trail to City of Renton Parks Department standards; and, c) Permanent, on-going maintenance of the public trail over the entire length of the trail on the project site. 9. Project Phasing: Note: Prior to issuance of any construction permits or a Site Grading License, the Mitigation Document requires the applicant to: a) Retain a qualified geotechnical consultant and a qualified hydraulics engineer to work with the applicant's civil engineering consultant to provide recommendations concerning the engineering and design of roadways, utilities, retaining walls, drainage and foundation systems. The geotechnical consultant shall.review and sign off on the project construction drawings prior to the issuance of any construction or building permits. b) In order to minimize disruption of steep slope areas, the geotechnical/hydraulics consultant(s), are required to prepare a CONSTRUCTION PHASING PLAN and erosion control plan for all grading, clearing and re-landscaping, prior to the issuance of Grading Permit or Building Permit. . Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner REZONE&SITE PLANAl )VAL FOR THE BLUFFS ECF;R;SA-044-89 PUBLIC HEARING: December 15,1992 Page 24 10. Community Security. In order to assure the security of residents, develop a community security plan for the project. The security plan shall be approved by the Administrative Services Division of the Police Department, prior to the issuance of an Occupancy Permit. The security plan is to include, but not be limited to the following measures: a) Card operated gates or on-site security personnel for underground parking garages; b) Secure central building lobbies through key/car access and closed circuit television surveillance system wired to all units.; c) Deadbolt locks on all entry doors to units; d) Security lighting of parking lots and buildings; and, e) Install of signage that at all entrance points and building identification to clearly marks all building facades to facilitate fire protection and police services. 11. Project Phasing: In order to address the sensitive nature of the site and its steep slopes, the applicant is required as a condition all Construction, Grading License or Building Permits to the following phasing: 1) All site Preparation ( site grading, utilities and roads) shall be the first'phase; 2) Site Preparation for all portions of the site shall be completed prior to issuance of any Building Permits. [See Note No. 9, below] 12. Pedestrian Walkway,at Entrance Drive: In order to address safety concerns, the applicant is required to revise the proposed walkway design to provide greater separation and safety for the pedestrian, prior to the issuance of Construction Permits. 13. Signage Plan: Prior to the issuance of Building Permits, it is recommended that the applicant be required to submit a signage plan for approval by the Development Services Division. SITE PLAN APPROVAL NOTES TO APPLICANT: 1. Off-Site Transportation/Utility Improvements: As a condition of the Building Permit issuance, the applicant must construct code-required off-site improvements on Lake Washington Boulevard. These would typically include: curb, gutter, sidewalks, street lighting and road widening with associated storm drainage considerations. Construction Plans for off-site improvements must be approved prior to the issuance of any Building Permits. 2. Deferral of Off-Site Transportation Improvements: Due to potential roadway configuration .and alignment change to Lake Washington Boulevard, in the vicinity of the site, the applicant may make application to the Board of Public Works for deferral of the above referenced off-site improvements. Conditions for any deferral would be set by the Board of Public Works. 3. Fire Mitigation Fees: Under Resolution, 2985, the applicant is required to pay a Fire Mitigation Fee of $388.00 per each residential unit and $0.52/sf for non-residential buildings (e.g. recreation building) prior to the issuance of a Building Permit. 4. Uniform Fire Code: In order to address Uniform Fire Code requirements relating to Fire and Emergency Access to Buildings, Parking Garages, the applicant is required to revise the Site and Building Plans, subject to Development Services Division and Fire Prevention Bureau approval, prior to the issuance of Building Permits address the following UFC issues: a)' Fire St"air access to the underground garages at Buildings "A" and "D"; b) A 20 foot-wide fire lane at the south side of Building "D" to address the maximum 150 foot hose-length from the fire apparatus; c) Exterior stairs at buildings "E" and "F" to address the maximum 150 foot hose-length from the fire apparatus; DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING: DECEMBER 15, 1992 Applicant: Colin Quinn Project Name: The Bluffs Application No. ECF;R;SA-044-89 Location of Proposal: The project is located between Lake Washington Boulevard North and 1-405, east of Gene Coulon Memorial Beach Park. A. SUMMARY AND PURPOSE OF REQUEST: The applicant has requested Contract Rezone [from the existing R-1 designation to the R-3 zone (medium density) residential designation] and Site Plan Approval to allow construction of a residential condominium complex consisting of six residential condominium buildings containing a total of 165 dwelling units, a recreation center and parking for 368 vehicles. The units are slated for sale to middle to upper income market. The site contains 22.6 acres and approximately 11.2. acres would be developed in buildings, parking, utilities, trails and drives and re-landscaped open space. Approximately 11.4 acres or 51 percent of the site would be left as natural open space. Recreational amenities include a recreation center, swimming pool, pedestrian walkway system, public trail and natural open space. The proposal would incorporate design elements similar to the architecture in Gene Coulon Park, providing a synergistic relationship between the complex and the nearby park. The proposed entrance driveway has been revised to provide 24 foot wide with an internal turnaround for emergency vehicles. The revised access plan retains the secondary emergency access road at the north end of the site. B. GENERAL INFORMATION 1. Owner of Record: Kirkman, Cooke, Lotto/Segur, Matsouka and Martindale 2. Applicant: Colin Quinn, Quinn-Webb Associates 3. Existing Zoning: R-1, Single Family/G-1, General (Tax lot 350 only). 4. Existing Zoning in the Area: G-1, R-1, R-3, R-4, B-1. 5. Comprehensive Land Use Plan: The Comprehensive Plan has multiple designations for the subject site: Commercial at the south end, green-belt for steep slope areas, low density multi-family in the central portion of the site, and high density multi-family at the north end of the site. 6. Size of Property: 22.6 acres. 7. Access: Lake Washington Boulevard '8. • Land Use: Undeveloped. 9. Neighborhood Characteristics: North: Multi-family residential, mobile home park and single- family residential. • ' Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner REZONE&SITE PLAN F; OVAL FOR THE BLUFFS ECF;R;SA-044-89 PUBLIC HEARING: December 15,1992 Page 2 East: Interstate 405 freeway, and single family residential east of the freeway. South: Undeveloped/single-family residential. West: Gene Coulon Memorial Beach Park: C. HISTORICAL BACKGROUND/PROJECT CHRONOLOGY: Action File Ordinance Date - Initial Annexation and R-1 Zone Designation N/A 1791 09/08/59 Clarification of Legal Description N/A 1804 12/08/59 Original Application for Rezone & PUD submitted ECF;R;SA-044-89 N/A 05/01/89 Council adopts Resolution 2911 exempts ten projects N/A Resolution from Comprehensive Plan Update "rezone moratorium". 2911 Final EIS Issued for rezone & development proposal ECF;R;SA-044-89 N/A 02/06/91 Addendum to FEIS & Mitigation Document Issued ECF;R;SA-044-89 N/A 10/08/92 Board of Public Works approves driveway slope variance ECF;R;SA-044-89 N/A 10/21/92 Revised Application for Rezone & Site Plan Approval ECF;R;SA-044-89 N/A 11/19/92 submitted D. PUBLIC SERVICES: 1. Utilities: a. Water: The project site is located within the City of Renton Water Utility service area. Although water lines do not exist on site there is an existing 16" main dead ends which at Marina Landing to the north of the subject site. This main is adequate to service the project. b. Sewer: The project site is located within the City of Renton Waste Water Utility service area. Although sewers do not exist on site, there is are existing 8" mains at the south entrance to Coulon Park and at Marina Landing. These mains are adequately sized to connect to the project. _ - c. Stormwater Drainage: Surface water currently drains from the site to ditches running along Lake Washington Boulevard. These ditches ultimately connect into two streams which enter Lake Washington through Coulon Park. The proposal includes on-site detention and biofiltration of storm water. During construction, the Mitigation. Document requires the applicant/contractor to take special measures to control erosion and sedimentation impacts to the streams running through Coulon Park into the lake. 2. Fire Protection: -Provided by the City of Renton's per ordinance requirements. 3. Transit: The subject site is not directly served by Metro. The nearest transit service center is the Park and Ride Lot located at NE 12th Street and Park Avenue N, which serve several routes from Seattle,. the east and south county areas. 4. Schools: The proposed project is located within Renton School District No. 403. Students in the area attend Kennydale Elementary School (k-6) 'approximately 1 mile from the site; McKnight Middle School (7-8), approximately 1 mile from the site; and Hazen High School (9-12), approximately 2 miles from the site. Using the Renton School District's student-per-household multipliers, the project would result PreliminarylReport to the Hearing Examiner REZONE&SITE PLAN APPI :L FOR THE BLUFFS ECF;R;SA-044-89' PUBLIC HEARING: December 15,1992 Page 3 In . 27 elementary school students and 27 junior and senior high school students, for a total of 54 --.. I students. 5. Recreation: The proposed development would generate an on-site population of approximately 297 residents who would contribute to the area-wide demand for access to private and public recreation facilities. The project would contain active recreational facilities for the residents of the apartments. A recreation center will be provided which contains a swimming pool and a recreation center,.pedestrian r. trail system and natural openspace. The project site is centrally located to access several of Renton's parks, including: Gene Coulon Memorial Beach Park immediately to the west of the site. E. . (APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE ZONING CODE: 1. 4-31-4: G-1 General Zone II - 2. 4-31-5: R-1 Residential Zone 3. 4=31-8A: R-3 Residence District 4. 4-31-33: Site Plan Review F. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR OTHER OFFICIAL CITY DOCUMENT: 1. Environmental Goal, City of Renton Comprehensive Plan Compendium, March 1986, pp. 8-11. . Urban Design Goal, City of Renton Comprehensive Plan Compendium, March 1986, pp. 11-14. 3. Residential Goal, City of Renton Comprehensive Plan Compendium, March 1986, pp. 14-16. . Transportation Goal, City of Renton Comprehensive Plan Compendium, March 1986, pp. 19-22. 5. Utilities Goal, City of Renton Comprehensive Plan Compendium, March 1986, pp. 22-24. B. Northeast Renton Plan, City of Renton Comprehensive Plan Compendium, March 1986, pp. 55-60. 7. Section 4-8-14 (C), Change of Zone Classification(Rezone), City of Renton Code. . Section 4-14, Parking and Loading Ordinance, City of Renton Code. 9. Section 9-12, Subdivision Ordinance, City of Renton Code. G. DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS: i1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION/BACKGROUND ORIGINAL PROPOSAL In 1989, the applicant submitted a proposal for a rezone and PUD. The first step in the review of the original proposal was preparation of draft and final environmental impact statements for the proposal. The original proposed action, as described in the FEIS, was for a rezone from the existing R-1 designation to the R-2 zone (low to medium density) residential designation, together with development of a planned unit development (PUD) of an apartment complex with six apartment buildings containing a total of 165 dwelling units, a recreation center and parking for 368 vehicles. The units are slated for a middle to upper income market. The site contains 22.6 acres and approximately 11.2. acres would be developed in buildings, parking, utilities, trails and drives and re- landscaped open space. Approximately 11.4 acres or 51 percent of the site would be left as natural open space. Recreational amenities include a recreation center, swimming pool, pedestrian walkway system, public trail and natural open space. The proposal would incorporate design elements similar to the architecture in Gene Coulon Park, providing a synergistic relationship between the complex and the nearby park. A PUD process will allow the City to include design and environmental measures as a permanent part of the permit. Retention of existing open space and treed areas will protect the environmentally sensitive areas and provide an aesthetically pleasing backdrop for users of Gene Coulon Park. - Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner REZONE&SITE PLAN Al OVAL FOR THE BLUFFS ECF;R;SA-044-89 PUBLIC HEARING: December 15,1992 Page 4 ADDENDUM TO THE FINAL EIS On October 9, 1992, the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) issued an Addendum to the Final EIS to recognize and assess the environmental impacts of recent changes in the proposed action. The ERC determined that an addendum was appropriate because the changes in the proposal did not substantially change'the impacts or alternatives discussed in the FEIS. Under WAC 197-11-600 (4) c., an addendum "adds analyses or information about a proposal but does not substantially change the analysis of significant impacts and alternatives in the existing document." The Addendum included two changes to the proposed land use action (a contract rezone with site plan approval), modifications to the proposed access driveway design, and a change in the marketing of the project from rental apartments to owner-occupied condominiums. All other aspects of`the revised proposal remain as originally proposed. Summary of Revised Proposal The applicant has requested Contract Rezone and Site Plan Approval to allow construction of a residential condominium complex consisting of six residential condominium buildings containing a total of 165 dwelling units, a recreation center and parking for 368 vehicles. The units are slated for sale to middle to .upper income market. The site contains 22.6 acres and approximately 11.2. acres would be developed in buildings, parking, utilities, trails and drives and re- landscaped open space. Approximately 11.4 acres or 51 percent of the site would be left as natural open space. Recreational amenities include a recreation center, swimming pool, pedestrian walkway system, public trail and natural open space. The proposal would incorporate design elements similar to the architecture in Gene Coulon Park, providing a synergistic relationship between the complex and the nearby park. The proposed, entrance driveway has been revised to provide 24 foot wide with an internal turnaround for emergency vehicles. The revised access plan retains the secondary emergency access road at the north end of the site. Contract Rezone The revised proposal is for a Contract Rezone from the existing R-1 designation to the R-3 zone (medium density) residential designation. Under the proposed Contract Rezone, overall project density would be limited to less than the original R-2 designation-.density of ten (10) dwelling units per acre. Overall proposed project density would be approximately 7.3 dwelling units per acre. The Contract Rezone is required under City Council Resolution 2911, for ten projects, including this proposal, which Council exempted from the " rezone moratorium" while the Comprehensive Plan is being updated. G-1 Zoned Parcel(Tax Lot 350) A small portion of Tax Lot 350, which is located at the SW corner of the subject site, is currently zoned G-1. The proposal would develop a portion of the entrance driveway and storm drainage facilities on this area. Since such development would be permitted in the G-1 zone, the request did not include rezoning this portion of the site to R-3. Because it would be desirable from both the applicant's and City's standpoint to have one designation for the entire site, staff suggest that the Hearing Examiner consider two possible alternatives in his decision and rezone recommendation to the City Council: 1) Recommend inclusion of this G-1 parcel as part of this rezone action; or 2) Recommend that Council redesignate this parcel as part of the zoning remapping that will be undertaken in 1993 as part of the Area-Wide Zoning. Site Plan Approval TheTevised proposal includes Site Plan Approval in lieu of the originally proposed Planned Unit-Development (PUD). From a land use standpoint, the Site Plan Ordinance would provide thine type of protections for the environment and public interest that were afforded under the PUD Ordinance. For example, the Site Plan Ordinance gives the City authority to impose site planning and design conditions, as well as, environmental measures as a permanent part of the permit. Under Site Plan Approval the City also has the authority to impose conditions requiring retention of existing open space and treed areas will protect the environmentally sensitive areas and provide an aesthetically pleasing backdrop for users of Gene Coulon Park. Modifications to Driveway Access The proposal originally included a main entrance driveway consisting of two twenty (20) foot wide lanes for in and out traffic, as well as, an emergency access road at the north end of the site. The purpose of the two extra wide lanes was to allow for each lane to serve for emergency access, should the other lane be blocked. Because of the extensive grading and retaining wall construction required for this type of roadway, the applicant requested the Fire Marshal to review the emergency access plan for the proposal. The Fire Marshall has approved a revised 24 foot wide entrance drive with an internal turnaround for emergency vehicles. On October 21, 1992, the Board of Public works approved a variance request to exceed the maximum allowable driveway slope of 8%. The revised access plan retains the secondary emergency access road at the north end of the site. s • y ` Preliminary:Report to the Hearing Examiner REZONE&SITE PLAN APPI- LL FOR THE BLUFFS ECF;R;SA-044-89' PUBLIC HEARING: December 15,1992 Page 5 '2. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental- Ordinance and SEPA (RCW 43.21C, 1971 as amended), the following environmental documents were prepared and issued [Note: copies of the referenced documents are contained in Exhibit 1, the official file]:. • • Draft Environmental Impact Statement was issued on May 15, 1992; • Final Environmental Impact Statement was issued on February 6, 1991; • Addendum to FEIS was issued on October 8, 1992; • • Mitigation Document was issued on October 8, 1992. • V •• The appeal period for the Mitigation Document ended on'October 29, 1992, with no appeals filed. ' 3. STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS • Representatives from various city departments have reviewed the application materials to identify and • address rezone and site plan (land use) issues from the proposed development. These comments are attached to this report, and the essence of the comments are contained in the Departmental Recommendation at the end of the report. 2. CONSISTENCY WITH REZONE CRITERIA Section 4-8-14 (C) outlines decision and recommendation findings required for Change of Zone Classification (Rezone): REZONE FINDINGS REQUIRED : I • 1'. "In any case where a change of the zone classification of property is recommended, at least one of the following circumstances shall be found to apply:" REZONE;;CIRCUMSTANCE: ;::; ' .: ::: ... .......... . .:.::...:... a :;:::;:;_::>:::That:;;::>:substantial::::'evidence;i<:>;was ::<presented:: demonstrating; :th.e :;>subject reclassification appears notto have been specifically considered at the time'of ahe;last;arealan.d;useanalysis:and::area;:zoning;:::or..:;;:::;.s`:':: : : ;::::.:;:: Although there have been significant authorized public improvements in the area (e.g. utilities, Coulon Park etc.), as well as several large-scale permitted private development projects in the vicinity (e.g. Marina Landing Apartments, PACCAR, Boeing), the subject site has had the same R-1 classification since it was annexed into the city: • • When the area was annexed to the City in 1959 it was given a zoning designation of R-1 consistent with the land use patterns in the immediate area at the time. [Note: a portion of a small single parcel (Tax Lot 350) is designated as G-1.] • The proposed zoning reclassification was not specifically considered as a part of the 1986 Comprehensive Plan Compendium, nor part of the 1981 Northeast Renton Plan. • The subject application for rezone was submitted in 1989: • Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner REZONE&SITE PLAN Al 'IVAL FOR THE BLUFFS ECF;R;SA-044-89 PUBLIC HEARING: December 15,1992 Page 6 REZ cos ECIRCUM T .. . b) `::That.theproperty is Obi.entially;classifiedfor_the.proposed zone being.reques e pursuant to.policiesset forth �n the Comprehensive Plan.and conditions have beenmef:whrch>would�ndreate:ahe.:change;`is aRproprrate;:;or: <::<;:> :::" Summary of Proposal's Compliance with the Comprehensive Plan: • The proposed reclassification is generally consistent with the Comprehensive Plan which designates four land uses for the site: 1% of the site is SF (4-6 du/ac) ; 39% of the site low density MF (6-15 du/ac); 14% is commercial; 45% of the site is designated greenbelt. Current zoning on the site is R-1 SF. Overall density of this development is 7.3 du/ac, with 51% of the site remaining in greenbelt use. • The proposal is also consistent with.Comprehensive Plan Goals, Policies, and Objectives for residential in areas containing environmentally sensitive features. Such residential development as proposed is also generally consistent with the Comprehensive Plan for Northeast Renton. Examples of Plan goals, policies, and objectives achieved through the proposed rezone and development include: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MARCH 1986 COMPENDIUM ENVIRONMENTAL GOAL: TO ESTABLISH AND MAINTAIN A HARMONIOUS RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE DEVELOPED .COMMUNITY AND ITS NATURAL ENVIRONMENT. A. BALANCED DEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVE: In order to maintain an .acceptable quality of life, land use decisions should be based upon a balance of public services, economic feasibility and environmental considerations. Policies: 1. Adequate. transportation capacity and utilities necessary to service new development should be available or provided in conjunction with actual development. 2. Urban development should be permitted when it is compatible with the natural and human environment. (3) Urban development should compensate for the services that it requires. Proposal's Conformance with Policies: • Adequate public utilities including water, sewer, electricity and telephone are available adjacent to the subject site. The applicant proposes to fund and construct all necessary off-site utility extensions and other required improvements. • The existing street system in the vicinity of the subject site (e.g. Lake Washington Blvd., Park Avenue N., Burnett Avenue N. and North 30th street have adequate capacity to handle traffic generated by the proposal without significantly degrading levels of service. Transit service to the subject site, remains inconvenient at best because of the distance to the nearest transit service center which is located at the Park and Ride Lot located at NE 12th Street and Park Avenue N. Preliminam Report to the Hearing Examiner REZONE&SITE PLAN APPI L FOR THE BLUFFS ECF;R;SA-044-89 PUBLIC HEARING: December 15,1992 - Page 7 • The proposal would be compatible with adjacent multi-family development immediately to the north of the subject site. It would be • buffered from single-family uses by the existing greenbelt vegetation on the site's steep slopes, which will be retained, as well as, vegetation on the 1-405 right-of-way. The closest single-family residences are located approximately 300 to 350 feet to the east on the other side of the 1-405 freeway. • The applicant proposes to construct all necessary infrastructure improvements at no cost to the City and will also compensate the City through both voluntary and code-required mitigation fees for other services (e.g. fire,'utilities, parks) required for the project which haye not been compensated for through other means. C. OPEN SPACE OBJECTIVE: Open space should be obtained and retained • in selected areas. Policies: 2. Natural vegetation, ravines, slopes, and waterbodies should be • preserved to retain open space. ;,` 3. Open space should be located throughout the city and incorporates an integral part of all development. Proposal's Conformance with Policies: . • Approximately 11.4 acres or 51 percent of the site would be left as natural open space., The applicant proposes to construct recreational amenities include a recreation center, swimming pool, pedestrian walkway system, public trail and natural open space. • The applicant has also voluntarily agreed to work with the Parks Department in providing public access through the site via a public trail easement. D. WILDLIFE HABITAT OBJECTIVE: Wildlife habitats should be designated, preserved and enhanced. Proposal's Conformance with Objective: • The proposal would retain significant portions of the site's habitat areas for various types of urban wildlife. These areas will primarily remain undisturbed except for the construction of the proposed access driveway. E. VEGETATION OBJECTIVE: To, preserve scenic beauty, prevent erosion, protect against floods and landslides, minimize air pollution, and reduce storm drainage system costs. Policies: 1. Desirable natural vegetation should be retained wherever possible. 2. In unique and/or fragile areas, desirable natural vegetation should be retained or enhanced. 3. Healthy trees should be retained where possible. • Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner REZONE&SITE PLAN A OVAL FOR THE BLUFFS ECF;R;SA-044-89 .. PUBLIC HEARING: December 15,1992 Page 8 Proposal's Conformance with Policies: • The site is currently covered by secondary growth deciduous forest, of red alder, cottonwood and maples, 'Douglas fir, western red cedar and western hemlock. Dense underlying shrub layer is also present. No endangered or unique species exist on site. • Any development of the site would result in loss of some plants and animals. Impacts from construction, increased human activity, clearing and grading would discourage animals from continuing to use the site. Retention of 51% of the site in open space areas would retain many of the large trees which could continue• to serve as perching trees. Large blocks of undisturbed greenbelt areas would provide some limited habitat for some more human tolerant species and a few less tolerant. • Revised Proposal The reduced width of the entrance driveway contained in the revised proposal would substantially reduce the amount of tree removal and vegetation clearing required on steep slope/green belt areas of the site. G. SURFACE DRAINAGE OBJECTIVE: To remove harmful materials and sediments, replenish ground water resources, and minimize erosion and floods, surface drainage should be controlled. Policies: 1. Storm waters should be retained on-site and then released at a natural rate and quality. The City's storm drainage system should be designed to incorporate natural drainage features. 3. Development should be designed to facilitate percolation and to minimize impermeable surfaces. 4. Development should include appropriate design and/or equipment to ensure clean runoff. Proposal's Conformance with Policies: • While most of these natural areas and valleys will remain undisturbed, the amount of the site which will become impervious surfaces is expected to produce a stormwater runoff average of 167% of the existing runoff rate. All stormwater flows would be collected by a tight- lined storm drainage system and ultimately directed to the system in Lake Washington Boulevard. Stormwater runoff would contain higher concentrations of nitrates, phosphates, sediment, heavy metals, oil and grease and would be of slightly higher temperatures than in the natural state. • Revised Proposal: The reduced width of the entrance driveway contained in the revised proposal would reduce the amount of impervious surface and associated storm water impacts. • The Mitigation Document requires the Applicant to enter into a permanent agreement with the City Surface Water Utility to provide for the maintenance on the detention pond including but not limited to removal of silt as needed. This agreement.shall be approved by the Surface Water Utility, Development Services Division and City Attorney prior to the issuance of any Grading or Building Permits; It also requires the applicant to: • Install a closed storm drainage system meeting all City of Renton standards and codes; Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner REZONE&SITE PLAN APP aL FOR THE BLUFFS ECF;R;SA-04489, • k , PUBLIC HEARING: December 15,1992 Page 9 • Provide oil/grease traps and silt sumps in street catch basins to aid in controlling the discharge of oil, grease and sediment. These are required to be maintained by the property owner in perpetuity; • Provide an on-site area for car washing with appropriate oil/grease traps and other devices; • Construct the aforementioned stormwater detention pond to allow settling of particulates and provide further water quality enhancement by providing a grassy swale at the pond outfall for biofiltration; and, • Provide for a licensed hydraulics engineer to be on duty as needed during the major grading and excavation activities to protect against erosion and related impacts. L. SLOPES OBJECTIVE: To protect life, property, soils, and waterbodies, slopes should be selectilvely developed. Policies: , 1. Slopes should be developed in accordance with sound engineering practices. Proposal's Conformance with Policies: • The EIS notes that the sensitivity of the site could lead to significant adverse impacts from erosion, sedimentation deposit, siltation of waterways, and possibly landslides without adequate mitigation measures. This site is sensitive from two standpoints: soil and slope. Both are impacted by clearing, grading and construction activities. Up to 137,000 cubic yards'of soil would be graded with 81,000 cy taken off site. Cut slopes would be required in the south central portion of the site to allow for the project's main access road. • This amount of clearing and grading (approximately 49% of the site) could cause significant erosion especially during periods of rainfall, the EIS states. Soil testing also indicates that if slopes are exposed and/or disturbed, and mitigation measures are not in place, the potential for landslides could also increase. Slopes on site vary from 25 to over 40%. Portions of some of the proposed buildings would be located within the 40% slope areas. The main access road, as already noted, also falls into the 40% slope category. • Revised Proposal: The reduced width of the entrance driveway contained in the revised proposal would substantially reduce the amount of cuts, fills and grading required on steep slope/green belt areas of the site. • • The Mitigation Document requires the applicant to implement a number of measures to reduce impacts to steep slopes including: • Retaining a qualified geotechnical consultant and a qualified hydraulics engineer to work with the applicant's civil engineering consultant to provide recommendations concerning the engineering and design of roadways, utilities, retaining walls, drainage and foundation systems. The geotechnical consultant shall review and sign off on the project . construction drawings prior to the issuance of any construction or building permits. • In order to minimize disruption of steep slope areas, the geotechnical/hydraulics consultant(s) are required to prepare a construction phasing plan and erosion control plan for all " Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner REZONE&SITE PLAN A OVAL FOR THE BLUFFS ECF;R;SA-04489 PUBLIC HEARING: December 15,1992 Page 10 grading, clearing and re-landscaping, prior to the issuance of Grading Permit or Building Permit. • During Construction, the applicant shall also retain the geotechnical/hydraulics engineering firm to monitor all major grading and excavation activities. III. URBAN DESIGN GOAL: TO. PROMOTE AESTHETIC AND FUNCTIONAL HARMONY, AND TO PROVIDE A PROPER BALANCE OF RESIDENTIAL, COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL AREAS. A. LAND DEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVE: Growth and DEVELOPMENT should occur in a timely and logical progression of the existing urban area to • maximize the use of existing services. Policies: 3: Vacant land surround by developed land should be given priority for development. 4. Land where adequate public utilities are available should be given priority for development. 5. a balance of residential, commercial, and industrial areas should be achieved. 11. Development requirements should be definite and reasonable. Proposal's Conformance with Policies: • The project site is located in an urban area with adequate utilities adjacent to the site. • The site is currently surrounded by a mixture of uses and facilities including: single-family, a major freeway, multiple family, a major municipal park facility and nearby heavy industrial uses. C. LANDSCAPE OBJECTIVE: Landscaping should be used for buffering, screening less attractive activities, and minimizing detrimental impact between uses. Policies: 1. Landscaping which enhances the primary design should be placed around all structures, in the interior of parking lots, and along the periphery of the site. Proposal's Conformance with Policies: • Approximately 51% of the site would be retained as open space with its natural vegetation retained. Most of this area abuts the periphery of the site. • The proposal includes extensive landscaping of all developed areas of the site, such as around all structures, in parking areas and along the site perimeter. IV RESIDENTIAL GOAL: TO ENCOURAGE SUITABLE HOUSING AND LIVING ENVIRONMENTS. Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner • REZONE&SITE PLAN AN AL FOR THE.BLUFFS ECF;R;SA-044-89�. PUBLIC HEARING: December 15,1992 Page 11 A. NEIGHBORHOODS OBJECTIVE: Sound, viable neighborhoods should be created and/or maintained; and declining neighborhoods should be revitalized. Policies: I � 3. Views should be maintained or enhanced; Proposal's Conformance with Policies: • The proposed development would not impact views from uphill ;I, locations. All views from the site, itself, would be maintained for the project's future residents. B. HOUSING QUALITY OBJECTIVE: Only well designed, constructed and maintained dwellings should be allowed. Policies: 3. Dwellings should be designed to take advantage of views, site character, and other amenities. Proposal's Conformance with Policies: • The proposed development would not impact views from uphill locations. All views from the site, itself, would be maintained for the project's future residents. Buildings would be located and oriented to take advantage of views to Lake Washington and south Seattle in the distance. The proposal would retain much of the natural character of the site as open space. The proposal also includes a trail system running the length of the site. C. HOUSING DENSITY OBJECTIVE:. The density and location of dwellings and mobile homes should take into consideration natural features, the character of the area, community facilities, utilities, and transportation • facilities. Policies: 3. Multi-family dwellings and mobile home parks should be located near arterial streets to assure adequate access. 8. Multi-family dwellings and mobile home parks should be located near employment and shopping centers. Proposal's Conformance with Policies: • . The proposed development meets all of the above objectives for housing. (VIII) UTILITIES GOAL: TO ENSURE AN ADEQUATE SUPPLY AND EQUITABLE DISTRIBUTION OF UTILITY SERVICES. a. GENERAL OBJECTIVE: Utilities should be well planned, located, designed, constructed, and maintained and should be upgraded where necessary. • • " Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner 1. REZONE&SITE PLAN A , OVAL FOR THE BLUFFS ECF;R;SA-044-89 PUBLIC HEARING: December 15,1992 Page 12 Policies: 1. Developers and/or public and private utility 'agencies should provide a complete utility system appropriate to the development. Proposal's Conformance with Policies: • The applicant is extending all the necessary utilities to the site and providing for complete and adequate facilities within the site. NORTHEAST RENTON PLAN LAND USE OBJECTIVE: The Land Use Element of the Northeast Quadrant Comprehensive Plan is intended to be a general guide to land use decision making. Policies: • 1. Land use decisions within the Northeast Quadrant should be consistent with available transportation, community facilities, and utilities. 3. Land development should progress logically from west to east ... Proposal's Conformance with Policies: • • As pointed out in other sections of this report, public services and facilities are available at or near the location of the proposed development and combined with on-site improvements, can accommodate the needs of the project. TRANSPORTATION OBJECTIVE: The Northeast Quadrant Plan proposes an integrated transportation system, including private vehicles and pedestrian/bicycle facilities. Policies: 5. Pedestrian and bicycle paths and trails should be developed between residential and commercial areas to minimize the requirement for vehicular trips to provide for convenience shopping. Proposal's Conformance with Policies: • The proposal includes a pedestrian walkway system through the developed portions of the project, as well as a trail, through the natural portions of the site. The applicant plans to work with the Park Department to provide public access to the.on-site trail. REZONE:CIRCUMSTANCE;..: ..... .... "°;:;::'Thatsinceth:e:last'previo'us land:use.analysis:of the.:area.zoning_of the subject• • property, authorized public•improvements;:permitted private development'or:• .:other circumstances:affecting;the subject property have undergone significant nd material:°changer.:....:..:. ..:: : :::::. In the time since the last previous land use analysis in 1981, the rate of development and infrastructure improvements in the vicinity has increased. Circumstances that support the proposed rezone include: Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner REZONE&SITE PLAN APP: IL FOR THE BLUFFS ECF;R;SA-O44-89' - PUBLIC HEARING: December 15,1992 Page 13 • The expansion of Gene Coulon Memorial Beach Park was completed. • WSDOT has undertaken major improvements to the Renton "S" Curves, a portion of which directly abuts the subject site. • PACCAR's site remediation program is underway. It is also nearing completion of its new truck manufacturing facility. • Boeing has completed several major capital improvements at the nearby Renton Plant. • The City of Renton and Boeing are joint applicants for a project that would dredge the Cedar River Delta and create a land fill for a public trail and'barge terminal in Lake Washington. A portion of the mitigation for the land fill is 'proposed off shore of Coulon Park.. • The City will start construction soon on major traffic revisions of Park Avenue North' and Garden Avenue/Houser Way to divert Boeing and PACCAR employees directly into parking lots. This project will reduce traffic impacts to Lake Washington.Boulevard. Another test to determine whether a rezone is appropriate is the question of timeliness. Is it appropriate to rezone the subject property at this time? • The Northeast Renton component of the Comprehensive Plan has been designated for substantial growth in both single family and multiple family households between 1990 and full development of the Plan area, with the population projected to increase from 43,050 to 110,000 during this period. The project provides housing for a population which is growing now. • ! • The site itself is suitable for development because it is essentially vacant, and • it is located adjacent to a major municipal recreation amenity: Coulon Park. • Adequate services exist now or will exist as development takes place through either installation by the applicant or a series of mitigation measures. • Water and sewer capacity exists off the site and extensions will be provided by the applicant. • Off-site storm water flows can be maintained at or below existing- levels through the storm water management system which utilizes a series of natural features (e.g., retained vegetation& biofiltration.) and designed facilities (e.g. swales, detention pond.) • Adequate capacity exists in the local middle school and high school to accommodate the anticipated number of children in the project. • Provision of an extraordinary police services surety device ensures that the City is reimbursed for extraordinary police services. • To ensure adequate fire protection, the applicant will both install sprinkler systems in all dwelling units and pay the code-required fire mitigation fee. • - No roadwayor intersection improvements were identified in the Final EIS as P necessary to mitigate any direct traffic impacts from the proposal or alternatives. The increase in traffic volumes from the two alternatives would not significantly worsen the Level of Service obtained at the Lake Washington • boulevard/Park Avenue N: or Lake Washington Boulevard/Burnett Avenue N. intersections. • The proposed development does not include .any commercial uses and given the terrain and the traffic patterns in the area, commercial uses may not be appropriate here. Single family development would disturb the site considerably more than a clustered approach, where building pads are share, which the applicant proposes. • Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner REZONE&SITE PLAN 4 DVAL FOR THE BLUFFS ECF;R;SA-044-89 PUBLIC HEARING: December 15,1992 Page 14 • From an environmental and greenbelt policy standpoint, the proposal provides more protection than the comp plan designations or the actual zoning designation. • Under the proposed Contract Rezone, overall project density would be limited to less than the original R-2 designation density of ten (10) dwelling units per acre. Overall proposed project density would be approximately 7.3 dwelling units per acre. The Contract Rezone is required under City Council Resolution 2911, for ten projects, including this proposal, which Council exempted from the "rezone moratorium"while the Comprehensive Plan is being updated. • The Final EIS contained an alternative which rezoned the site to the R-3, medium density multi-family designation for construction of 265 units. Unlike that alternative, however, the revised proposal would contain 165 condominium units. • REZONE FINDINGS REQUIRED : 2. If the Hearing Examiner further determines that the change of the zone classification is advisable, in the public interest, tends to further the preservation and enjoyment of any substantial property rights of the petition, is not materially detrimental to the public welfare or the properties of other persons located in the vicinity thereof, and is in harmony with the purposes and effect of the Comprehensive Plan, then in such event, the Hearing Examiner may recommend that the City Council approve the change of the zone classification. The evidence presented above generally supports the rezone. It appears to be advisable, in the public interest, tends to further the preservation and enjoyment of any substantial property rights of the petition, is not materially detrimental to the public welfare or the properties of other persons located in the vicinity thereof, and is in harmony with the purposes and effect of the Comprehensive Plan. • 3. CONSISTENCY WITH SITE PLAN APPROVAL CRITERIA Section 4-31-33(D) lists criteria that the Hearing Examiner is asked to consider along with all other relevant information in making a decision on a Site Plan Approval application. These include the following: 1. Conformance with the Comprehensive Plan, its elements and policies; Summary of Proposal's Compliance with the Comprehensive Plan: • The proposed reclassification is generally consistent with the Comprehensive Plan which designates four land uses for the site: 1% of the site is SF (4-6 du/ac) ; 39% of the site low density MF (6-15 du/ac); 14% is commercial; 45% of the site is designated greenbelt. Current zoning on the site is R-1 SF. Overall density of this development is 7.3 du/ac, with 51% of the site remaining in greenbelt use. • The proposal is also consistent with Comprehensive Plan Goals, Policies, and Objectives for residential in areas containing environmentally sensitive features. Such residential development as proposed is also generally consistent with the Comprehensive Plan for Northeast Renton. • For additional analysis of the proposal's conformance with the Comprehensive Plan's elements and policies, please refer above in this report to Section 2. CONSISTENCY WITH REZONE CRITERIA.- The evidence presented in that section above generally supports the proposal's consistency with the Comprehensive Plan and the proposed rezone. The rezone appears to be advisable, in the public interest, tends to further the • preservation and enjoyment of any substantial property rights of the petition, is not . • PreliminaryReport to the Hearing Examiner 0 <t - REZONE&SITE PLAN APPR FOR THE BLUFFS ECF;R;SA-044489 • PUBLIC HEARING: December 15,1992 Page 15 • materially detrimental to the public welfare or the properties of other persons located in the vicinity thereof, and is in harmony with the purposes and effect of the Comprehensive Plan. 2. Conformance with existing land use regulations; • ' The proposal is consistent with the purpose of the R-3 designation. The proposed density of 7.3 dwelling units per acre is substantially less than the 25 du/acre permitted outright in this district. Note: Up to 35 du/ac may be permitted subject to Conditional Use Permit. Multiple family dwelling units are permitted as a Principal Use. The proposal is meets or exceeds the following development standards required in the R-3 zone: R-3 ZONE • DEVELOPMENT STANDARD PROPOSAL'S CONFORMANCE Density: 25 to 35 du/acre maximum 7.3 du/acre - Lot Area: 7,200 sf minimum 983,600 sf lot(site)area Minimum Lot Dimensions: 60' Dimensions of site far exceed these width &85'depth requirements. Setbacks: Maximum setbacks are 30' Dimensions of setbacks proposed far for streets. exceed these requirements. Height: 50 feet Proposal would be consistent with the maximum 50 feet. See attached height diagram provided by applicant. Coverage: 35%maximum. Proposal would cover approximately • 21.8%of the site I , 3. Mitigation of impact to surrounding properties and uses; a) Mitigation of undesirable impacts of proposed structures and site layouts that could impair the use or enjoyment or potential use of surrounding uses and structures and of the community. • Approximately 51% of the site would be retained as open space with its natural vegetation retained. Since most of this area abuts the periphery of the site there should be substantial visual buffering provided to surrounding uses and structures. • The proposal includes extensive landscaping of all developed areas of the site, such as around all structures, in parking areas and along the site perimeter. • The proposed development would not impact views from uphill locations. All views from the site, itself, would be maintained for the project's future residents. b) Mitigation of undesirable impacts when an overscale structure, in terms of size, bulk, height, and intensity, or site layout is permitted that violates the `spirit and/or intent of the Zoning Code and impairs the use, enjoyment or potential use of surrounding properties. • The EIS notes that the proposal would change a completely wooded hillside into a partially wooded hillside with views of the upper stories of the proposal from Gene Coulon Park. For users of the park, this change could be seen as a significant impact. Because of the retention of the northern greenbelt, no view • disruption would be experienced from 1-405 or from the residential areas north of 405. The most significant view disruption would be from the Park. In order to aesthetically relate the development with Gene Coulon Park, the applicant 4 • Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner s f . REZONE&SITE PLAN X,y ,;OVAL FOR THE BLUFFS ECF.R;SA-044-89 PUBLIC HEARING: December 15,1992 Page 16 revised the architectural scheme in the Final EIS to incorporate many of the architectural elements (e.g. roof shapes and materials) from the park's design theme. Revised Proposal The reduced width of the entrance driveway contained in the revised proposal would substantially reduce the amount of cuts, fills, grading and vegetation removal required on steep slope/green belt areas of the site, thus reducing the aesthetic/visual impact of the development. c) . Provision of a desirable transition and linkage between uses and to the street, utility, walkway, and industrial systems in the surrounding area by the arrangement of landscaping, fencing an/or other buffer techniques, in order to prevent.conflicts and to promote coordinated and planned benefit from, and access to, such elements. • Retention of substantial portions of the site as open space with natural vegetation will provide a desirable,transition between the proposed uses and Lake Washington Boulevard • The applicant proposes to construct an on-site system of pedestrian walkways and a trail that will traverse the length of the site. The development would be linked to the street by a pedestrian walkway which would be constructed as part of the proposed entrance driveway. The applicant proposes that the walkway would be part of the roadway paving and would be separated from traffic by only an extruded concrete curb. Staff recommend that in order to address safety concerns, the applicant be required to revise the proposed walkway design to conform to city standards for curb, gutter& sidewalk construction. d) Consideration of placement and scale of proposed structures in relation to the natural characteristics of a site in order to avoid over-concentration of structures on a particular portion of a site such that they create a perception of greater height or bulk than intended under the spirit of the zoning'code; • The EIS notes that the proposal would change a completely wooded hillside into a partially wooded hillside with views of the upper stories of the proposal from Gene Coulon Park. For users of the park, this change could be seen as a significant impact. Because of the retention of the northern greenbelt, no view disruption would be experienced from 1-405 or from the residential areas north of 405. The most significant view disruption would be from the Park. In order to aesthetically relate the development with Gene Coulon Park, the applicant revised the architectural scheme in the Final EIS to incorporate many of the architectural elements (e.g. roof shapes and materials) from the park's design theme. • The proposed site plan with its retention of large natural open-space areas as buffers would not result in over-concentration of structures or create a perception of greater height or bulk than intended under the spirit of the zoning code. e) Effective location, design and screening of parking and service areas in order to promote efficient function of such facilities, to provide integrated facilities between uses when beneficial, to promote "campus-like" or "park-like" layouts in appropriate zones, and to prevent unnecessary repetition and conflict between uses and service area or facilities. • The proposed site plan with its retention of large natural open-space areas as buffers would create a "campus-like" or "park-like" appearance for the development. Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner ', REZONE&SITE PLAN APPI L FOR THE BLUFFS ECF;R;SA-044-89 • PUBLIC HEARING: December 15,1992 ` Page 17 Mitigation of the unnecessary and avoidable impacts of new construction on . views from existing buildings. and future developable sites, recognizing the public benefit and desirability of maintaining visual accessibility to attractive natural features and of promoting "campus-like" or "park-like" settings in appropriate zones. • The EIS notes that the proposal would change a completely wooded hillside into a partially wooded hillside with views of the upper stories of the proposal from Gene Coulon Park.'For users of the park, this change could be seen as a j �,. ... significant impact. Because of the retention of the northern greenbelt, no view disruption would be experienced'from 1-405 or from the residential areas north of 405. The most significant view disruption would be from the Park. In order to aesthetically relate the development with Gene Coulon Park, the applicant revised the architectural scheme in the Final EIS to incorporate many of the architectural elements (e.g. roof shapes and materials) from the park's design theme. • Revised Proposal The reduced width of the entrance driveway contained in the revised proposal would substantially reduce the amount of cuts, fills, grading and vegetation removal required on steep slope/green belt areas of the site, thus reducing the aesthetic/visual impact of the development. g) Provision of effective screening from public streets and residential uses for all permitted 'outdoor storage areas (except auto and truck sales), for surface • mounted utility equipment, for rooftop equipment, and for all refuse and garbage containers, in order to promote a "campus-like" or "park-like" setting where appropriate and to preserve 'the effect and intent of screening or buffering otherwise required by the Zoning Code. • Approximately 51% of the site would be retained as open space with its natural it vegetation retained. Since most of this area abuts the periphery of the site there should be substantial visual buffering provided to surrounding uses and structures. • The proposal includes extensive landscaping of all developed areas of the site, such as around all structures, in parking areas and along the site perimeter. h) Consideration of placement and design of exterior lighting in order to 'avoid excessive brightness or glare to adjacent properties and streets. • ' Proposed lighting would have adequate shielding 'to avoid light and glare impacts both on-site and to adjacent properties. • The distance to adjacent properties coupled with the visual screening provided by the natural' open space areas on the perimeter of the site should provide additional screening for adjacent properties. 4. Mitigation of impacts of the proposed site plan to the site; a) Building placement and' spacing to provide 'for privacy and noise reduction; orientation to views and vistas and to site amenities, to sunlight and prevailing winds, and to pedestrian and vehicle needs. • Proposed residential buildings' have been adequately spaced and sited at different orientations, with respect to each other, in order to provide privacy and also take advantage of the site's panoramic views to the west. The siting of buildings would also provide for adequate light and air for the buildings, themselves, as well as for pedestrian and vehicular needs. • ' Preliminary Report to the Hearing"Examiner REZONE&SITE PLAN P,; 'DVAL FOR THE BLUFFS.ECF;R;SA-044-89 PUBLIC HEARING: December 15,1992 Page 18 b) Consideration of placement and scale of proposed structures in relation to the openness and natural characteristics of a site in order to avoid overcentration or the impression of oversized structures. • The EIS notes that the proposal would change a completely wooded hillside into a partially wooded hillside with views of the upper stories of the proposal from Gene Coulon Park. For users of the park, this change could be seen as a significant impact. Because of the retention of the northern greenbelt, no view disruption would be experienced from 1-405 or from the residential areas north of 405. ,The most significant view disruption would be from the Park. In order to aesthetically relate the development with Gene Coulon Park, the applicant revised the architectural scheme in the Final. EIS to incorporate many of the architectural elements (e.g. roof.shapes and materials).from the park's design theme. • Revised Proposal The reduced width of the entrance driveway contained in the revised proposal would substantially reduce the amount of cuts, fills, grading and vegetation removal required on steep slope/green belt areas of the site, thus reducing the aesthetic/visual impact of the development. c) Preservation of the desirable natural landscape through retention of existing vegetation and limited soil removal, insofar as the natural characteristics will enhance the proposed development. • The proposal would leave approximately 51% of the site in natural open space. Most of the openspace areas to be retained are steep slope/greenbelt areas. These 'open space areas would preserve the most sensitive and important natural areas of the site and would also minimize vegetation and soil impacts to the site • • Revised Proposal: The reduced width of the entrance driveway contained in the revised proposal would substantially reduce the amount of cuts, fills and grading required on steep slope/green belt areas of the site. • The Mitigation Document requires the applicant to implement a number of measures to reduce impacts to steep slopes. d) Use of topography to reduce undue cutting, filling and retaining walls in order to prevent erosion and unnecessary storm water runoff, and to preserve stable natural slopes and desirable natural vegetation. • With the exception of the entrance driveway which must traverse the steep slope areas, proposed building constructed is limited to the flatter portions of the site located on top of the bluffs and the lower flat portion of the site adjacent to the existing Marina Landing apartments. e) Limitation of paved or impervious surfaces, where feasible, to reduce runoff and increase natural infiltration. Impervious surfaces have been limited to the greatest extent feasible through the following means by the proposal: • Multiple-story building construction. • Location of over a third of the proposed parking in garages beneath the residential buildings. • Efficient roadway and parking area design to eliminate unnecessary paving of the site. r- - Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner REZONE&SITE PLAN APPI kL FOR THE BLUFFS ECF;R;SA-044-89• PUBLIC HEARING: December 15,1992 • Page 19 f) Design and protection of planting areas so that they are not susceptible to damage from vehicles or pedestrian movements. • Planting areas adjacent to parking would be protected by curbing and wheel stops. Other planting areas would be protected by the appropriate location of paved walkways connecting the residential buildings with each other, parking areas and recreation facilities. g) Consideration of building form and placement and landscaping to enhance year round conditions of sun and shade both on-site and on adjacent properties and to promote energy conservation. • Proposed residential buildings have been adequately spaced and sited at different orientations, with respect to each other, in order to provide privacy and also take advantage of the site's panoramic views to the west. The siting of buildings would also provide for adequate light and air for the buildings, themselves, as well as for pedestrian and vehicular needs: 5. Conservation of area-wide property values; • With the exception of the subject site most of the area surrounding the site is developed and the'existing uses are generally maintained in good condition. In its • .,. present vacant condition, the site could represent a liability with respect to area-wide ''' property values. For example, vacant sites such as this, are often opportunities for unauthorized dumping of refuse, abandoned cars etc. The also present opportunities for unauthorized use by motorized trail bikes. Development of the proposal would prempt such uses. • The applicant is proposing to construct 165 new condominium residential units, which • will primarily be owner-occupied. Because of the size of the proposed units and the view amenities offered by the site, it is anticipated that these units would be sold to persons with substantial incomes. Thus the project should be an asset to area-wide property values. 6. Safety and efficiency of vehicle and pedestrian circulation; a) Provision of adequate and safe vehicular access to and from all properties. • Adequate circulation for vehicles and pedestrians is proposed, with separate walkways and trails for pedestrians. • The applicant proposes to construct an on-site system of pedestrian walkways and a trail that will traverse the length of the site. The development would be linked to the street by a pedestrian walkway which would be constructed as part of the proposed entrance driveway. The applicant proposes that the walkway would be part of the roadway paving and would be separated from traffic by only an extruded concrete curb. • • Staff recommend that in order to address safety concerns, the applicant be required to revise the proposed walkway design to provide greater separation and safety for the pedestrian. b) Arrangement of the circulation pattern so that all ingress and egress movements may occur at as few points as possible along the public street, the points being capable of channelization for turning movements. • Access to and from the site has been limited to the minimum possible: at two locations on Lake Washington Boulevard. One would provide access to the lower portion of the development using the adjacent Marina Landing development's existing access at N. 20th. The other, proposed new access at the south end of the site, would provide access to the upper or bluff portion of the project. i ' Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner REZONE&SITE PLAN A )VAL FOR THE BLUFFS ECF;R;SA-044-89 PUBLIC HEARING: December 15,1992 Page 20 c) Consolidation of access points with adjacent properties, when feasible. • Access points for the lower portion of the proposal are already consolidated with Marina Landing's access to Lake Washington Boulevard at N. 20th. d) Coordination of access points on a superblock basis so that vehicle conflicts and vehicle/pedestrian conflicts are minimized. • NOT APPLICABLE. - e) Orientation of access points to side streets or frontage streets rather than directly on to arterial streets, when feasible. • NOT APPLICABLE. f) Promotion of the safety and efficiency, of the internal circulation system, including the' location, design and dimensions of: vehicular and pedestrian • access points, drives, parking, turnarounds, walkways, bikeways, and emergency access ways. • The internal circulation system has been designed with adequate dimensions and layout to provide safety for users. The circulation has also been designed to allow for good access by fire and emergency vehicles. g) Separation of loading and delivery areas from:parking•and pedestrian areas. • NOT APPLICABLE.-No loading/delivery areas are proposed. h) Provisions for transit and carpool facilities and access when appropriate. • NOT APPLICABLE. Since no transit routes are located on the roads in the vicinity of the site, no on-site transit facilities are proposed. Should a route be implemented in the future by Metro along Lake.Washington Boulevard; the applicant has indicated the desire to locate a transit passenger;waiting shelter at or near the south site entrance. i) Provision for safe and attractive pedestrian connections between parking areas, buildings, public sidewalks and adjacent properties. • The applicant proposes to construct an on-site system of pedestrian walkways and a trail that will traverse the length of the site. The development would be linked to the street by a pedestrian walkway which would be constructed as part of the proposed entrance driveway. 7. Provision of adequate light and air; • • As previously discussed, above, the proposed site plan would provide sufficient building spacing coupled with varied orientations with respect to each other to insure adequate light, air, and visual privacy. 8. Mitigation of noise, odors, and other harmful or unhealthy conditions; • NOT APPLICABLE. The proposal does not include facilities or activities that would • create significant noise, odor or other harmful or unhealthy conditions. 9. Availability of public services and facilities to accommodate the proposed use; and, • Adequate services exist now or will exist as development takes place through either installation by the applicant or a series of mitigation measures required 7r Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner REZONE&SITE PLAN APPI ;L FOR THE BLUFFS ECF;R;SA-044-89 • PUBLIC HEARING: December 15, 1992 Page 21 • of the applicant by the city. [For additional discussion of the availability of public services and facilities please see Rezone Section, p. 14] 10. Prevention of neighborhood deterioration and blight. • With the exception of the subject. site most of the area surrounding the site is developed and the existing uses are generally maintained in good condition. In its ` present vacant condition, the site could represent a liability with respect to area-wide property values. For example, vacant sites such as this, are often opportunities for ,... unauthorized dumping of refuse, abandoned cars etc. The also present opportunities for unauthorized use by motorized trail bikes. Development of the proposal would prempt such uses. 11. ' Signage '' a) Employment of signs primarily for the purposes of identification r j • - The only signage proposed by will consist of site identification signs at the two site entrances, and identification signs for each of the proposed buildings. b) Management of sign elements, such as size, location and arrangement so that signs complement the visual character of the surrounding area and appear in proportion to the building and site to which they pertain. w • • The only signage proposed by will consist of site identification signs at the two site entrances, and identification signs for each of the proposed buildings. • .3, • Prior to the issuance of Building Permits, it is recommended that the applicant be required to submit a signage plan for approval by the Development Services Division. c) Limitation of the number of signs to avoid visual clutter and distraction. • Prior to the issuance of Building Permits, it is recommended that the applicant be required to submit a signag,e plan for approval by the Development Services Division. d) Moderation'of surface brightness or lighting intensity'except for that necessary for sign visibility • No illuminated signs are included in the proposal. e) Provision of an identification system to allow for quick location of buildings and addresses. • All address signage will be per the city address code. • The upper and lower portions of the project shall have separate addresses to aid in location during emergencies. 12. Hazardous Waste Treatment and Storage Facilities. • NOT APPLICABLE. No Hazardous Waste Treatment and Storage Facilities are proposed. Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner ' . REZONE&SITE PLAN p, )VAL FOR THE BLUFFS ECF;R;SA-044-89 "- PUBLIC HEARING: December 15,1992 Page 22 _.H. DEPARTMENTAL RECOMMENDATIONS: REZONE TO R-3 RECOMMENDATIONS The evidence presented in this staff report generally supports the proposed rezone. Staff believe that the proposed rezone action appears to be advisable, in the public interest, tends to further the preservation and enjoyment of any substantial property rights of the petition, is not materially detrimental to the public welfare or the properties of other persons located in the vicinity thereof, and is in harmony with the purposes and effect of the Comprehensive Plan. A small portion of Tax Lot 350, which is located at the SW corner of the subject site,- is currently zoned G-1. The proposal would develop a portion of the entrance driveway and storm drainage facilities on this area. Since such development would be permitted in the G-1 zone, the request did not include rezoning this portion of the.site to R-3. Because it would be desirable from both the applicant's and City's standpoint to have,one designation for the entire site, staff suggest that the Hearing Examiner consider two possible alternatives'in his decision and rezone recommendation to the City Council: 1) Recommend inclusion of this G-1 parcel as part of this.rezone'action; or 2) Recommend that Council redesignate this parcel as part of the zoning remapping that will be undertaken in 1993 as part of the Area- Wide Zoning. Because the proposal is generally consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, circumstances have change since the last land use update, and there are adequate utilities and services to support the development, staff recommend approval of the contract rezone from R-1 (and the small parcel currently zoned G-1) to R-3 with the following conditions: 1. Rezone Contract: The applicant is required to enter into a contract agreement with the City of Renton which 'binds the applicant to construct the project, as approved with conditions. This agreement shall require that all residential'units be constructed as condominiums. Under this agreement, the applicant shall be required to establish covenants running with the land that establish the maximum overall project density of no more than 7.3 condominium dwelling units per acre; and the overall project height at 50 feet. 2. Mitigation,Document. Conditions: The applicant is required to implement all of the conditions imposed by the Environmental Review Committee in the Mitigation Document for the Bluffs, which was issued on October 9, 1992. [See Exhibit 1, Official File for copy of Mitigation Document.] Evidence of compliance with Mitigation Conditions required to be completed prior to the issuance of any Construction, Grading License, or Building Permits shall be submitted by the applicant as part of the application submittals for those permits. 3. Site Approval Conditions: The applicant is required to abide by all Site Plan Approval Conditions listed below. CONTRACT REZONE NOTES TO APPLICANT: 1. Owner Occupancy of Condominiums: The applicant is encouraged to require through covenants or the bylaws of the Condominium Homeowners Association that, a substantial portion of the 165 condominium units be "owner-occupied". 2: Local Marketing:,The applicant is encouraged to make concerted efforts to market the condominium units to local residents, as well as, other in the metropolitan area. SITE PLAN APPROVAL RECOMMENDATIONS: ' Because the proposed site plan is generally consistent with the criteria outlined in Section 4-31-33 of the Site Plan Review Ordinance, staff recommend approval of the Site Plan with the following conditions: 1. Mitigation Document Conditions: The applicant is required to implement all of the conditions imposed by the Environmental Review Committee in the Mitigation Document for the Bluffs, which was Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner c , REZONE&SITE PLAN APPI 1L FOR THE BLUFFS ECF;R;SA-044-89 • PUBLIC HEARING: December 15,1992 ` 'Page 23 issued on October 9, 1992. [See Exhibit 1, Official File for copy of Mitigation Document.] Evidence of compliance with Mitigation Conditions required to be completed prior to the issuance of any Construction, Grading License, or Building Permits shall be submitted by the applicant as part of the application submittals for those permits. 2. Greenbelt/Steep Slope Covenants: The applicant is required to establish covenants running with the land that set aside and protect all undisturbed steep slope/greenbelt areas. These areas are to remain in their natural state except for natural trails which may be located through the area. The covenants shall be approved by the Development Services Division and City Attorney prior to the issuance of any Construction or Building Permits. 3 • Landscape Maintenance Covenants: The applicant is required to establish covenants running with the land acknowledging this and future owner's responsibilities for" maintaining the new on-site landscaping and other improvements on the site in accordance with accepted landscape principals. The covenant shall require the land owner to agree to replace any and all new landscaping that has died or been so severely damaged through improper maintenance,(e.g. improper or excessive pruning) ' II as to destroy or,significantly reduce the original intent. The landscaping covenant shall be approved by the Development Services Division and City Attorney prior to the issuance of a Building Permit. 4. Landscaping Surety Device The applicant shall post a surety device, to be approved by the Development Services Division for maintenance and plant replacement of all site landscaping to cover a three (3) year period. Evidence of the surety device is required prior to the issuance of a Building Permit. 5. Facilities Maintenance: In order to insure the maintenance and upkeep of residential building exteriors and common community facilities, the applicant is required to: a) Establish a condominium homeowners association for the continual maintenance of the site facilities (e.g. landscaping, roads, utilities) , common facilities (recreation, lobbies etc.) and residential building exteriors. b) Establish covenants on the land, as well as, on each,condominium deed requiring on-going maintenance of the facilities described in "a", above, as well as, participation .in the condominium homeowners association. 6. On-Site Recreation: In order to address demand for on-site private recreation facilities, the applicant is required construct the proposed recreation center, swimming pool and pedestrian walkways. 7. Off-Site Recreation Demand: In order to reduce the potential impacts from off-site recreational demand on existing city park and recreational facilities, either: a) Work with the Park Department to develop public off-site or on-site trails and/or park facilities; or, b) Pay a Parks Comprehensive Plan Mitigation Fee in effect at the time of issuance of a Building Permit for each element of the project. If no fee is in effect at that time, the applicant will pay an off-site Park Mitigation Fee of$180 per multi-family unit. 8. Street Cleaning Surety Device During Construction: The applicant is required to post a surety device, to be approved by the Transportation Systems Division for street cleaning during the construction phase of the project. Evidence of the surety device is required prior to the issuance of a Building Permit. i 9. Extraordinary Impact on Police Services: In order to reduce the potential impacts on the existing police force, the applicant has agreed to enter into a voluntary agreement with the City of Renton to reimburse the Police Department for costs if there are extraordinary increases in service calls as a result of this project. This agreement shall be approved by the Chief of Police prior to the issuance of Final Occupancy Permits. anAlrr JJo, c:• u. nLL..RAIf•B LAKE WASHINGTON GARDEN OF EDEN ADDITION TO SEATTLE DIVISION HO. FIVE, ACCORDING TO THE THEREOF RECORDED IN V'' E 11 OF PLATS, PAGE 83, IN KING COUNTY, HINGTON; E'_ r THAT PORTION THEREOF LYING EASTERLY C: >`E WESTERLY MARGIN OF STATE HIGHWAY NO. 1 (SR 405) AS ESTABLISHED BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 4682225; TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF THE PACIFIC COAST RAILROAD COMPANY'S • NENCASTLE BRANCH RIGHT OF WAY, BEING A STRIP OF SAID RIGHT OF WAY 200 FEET IN WIDTH, 100 FEET OF SUCH WIDTH LYING ON EITHER SIDE OF THE CENTERLINE OF SAID RIGHT OF WAY, AS THE SAME WAS LOCATED ON OCTOBER 15, 1946 AND BOUNDED ON THE NORTH BY THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF TRACT 333, C. D. HILLMAN'S LAKE WASHINGTON GARDEN OF EDEN ADDITION TO SEATTLE DIVISION NO. FIVE, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 11 0P PLATS, PAGE 83, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, PRODUCED WESTERLY OVER AND ACROSS SAID RIGHT OF WAY, AND ON THE SOUTH BY THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF TRACT 336 OF SAID PLAT, PRODUCED WESTERLY OVER AND ACROSS SAID RIGHT OF WAY; EXCEPT THAT PORTION THEREOF LYING EASTERLY OF THE WESTERLY MARGIN OF PRIMARY STATE HIGHWAY NO. 1 (SR 405) AS ESTABLISHED BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 4648616. PARCEL CS • • THAT PORTION OF THE PACIFIC COAST RAILROAD COMPANY'S RIGHT OF WAY IN SECTION 5, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, LYING BETWEEN THE NORTH AND SOUTH MARGINS OF THIRD AVENUE, EXTENDED TO THE WEST, AS DELINEATED ON C. D. HILLMAN'S LAKE WASHINGTON GARDEN OF EDEN ADDITION TO SEATTLE DIVISION NO. FIVE, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 11 OF PLATS, PAGE 83, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, AND LYING WESTERLY OF A LINE DRAWN PARALLEL WITH AND 180 FEET WESTERLY, WHEN MEASURED RADIALLY, FROM THE LINE OF SURVEY OF SR 405, RENTON TO XENNYDALE. AFFIDAVIT i, Thomas Cooke , being duly sworn, declare that I a (please check one) the authorized representative to act of r t se property owner, X the owner of t1 property Involved In this application and that the foregoing statements and answers h arcontained and t1 information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief, SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS • 9th DAY OF October lg 89 • NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, RESIDING AT: Issaquah, Washington (Na otary Public) Gregg C. a c D o n a l (Signature of Owner) P. O. Box 983 65/- 5-7T�AA/Pe2 A /oo (Address) (Address) Issaquah, WA 98027 (L[._, a/c4 - 98/88 (City/Stale/Zip) (City/State/zip) (206) 392-5455 (ZD.) 575-39Z5 (Telephone) • (Telephone) Acceptance of this application and required filing fee does not constitute a complete application. Plans other material required to constitute a complete application are listed in the 'Application Procedure' RtnMastr Revised 5/89 - LEGAL DESCRIPTION I. KIRKMAN PARCEL A: THAT PORTION OF THE RIGHT OF WAY 200.00 FEET IN WIDTH DELINEATED ON C.D HILLMAN'S LAKE WASHINGTON GARDEN OF EDEN DIVISION NO. 5, ACCORDING TO T. PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 11 OF PLATS, PAGE 83 , IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, AS "C AND P.S.R.R. " LYING BETWEEN THE WESTERLY PRODUCTION 0. THE NORTH LINE OF TRACT 322 OF SAID PLAT AND THE WESTERLY PRODUCTION OF THE SOUTH LINE OF TRACT 317 OF SAID PLAT, AND LYING WESTERLY OF STATE HIGHWAY 405. • EXCEPT THAT PORTION LYING BETWEEN THE EASTERLY PRODUCTION OF THE NORTH LINE OF TRACT 350 OF SAID PLAT AND THE WESTERLY PRODUCTION OF THE SOUTH • LINE OF TRACT 317 OF SAID PLAT; EXCEPT THAT PORTION LYING BETWEEN THE WESTERLY PRODUCTION OF THE NORTH LINE OF TRACT 322 OF SAID PLAT AND THE WESTERLY PRODUCTION OF THE SOUTH LINE OF TRACT 319 OF SAID PLAT; PARCEL B: THAT PORTION OF TRACT 319, C.D. HILLMAN'S LAKE WASHINGTON GARDEN OF EDEI DIVISION NO. 5, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 11 OF PLATS, PAGE 83, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, LYING WESTERLY OF STATE HIGHWAY NO. 405, AND THAT PORTION OF PACIFIC COAST RAILROAD RIGHT OF WA`. LYING ADJACENT. THERETO WEST OF STATE HIGHWAY NO. 405; PARCEL C: THAT PORTION OF TRACT 320, C.D. HILLMAN'S LAKE WASHINGTON GARDEN OF EDEP DIVISION NO. 5, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 11 OF PLATS, PAGE 83, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, LYING WESTERLY OF STATE HIGHWAY NO. 405, AND THAT PORTION OF PACIFIC COAST RAILROAD RIGHT OF WA1 LYING ADJACENT THERETO WEST OF STATE HIGHWAY NO. 405; PARCEL D: THAT PORTION OF TRACTS 321 AND 322, C.D. HILLMAN'S LAKE WASHINGTON GARDEN OF EDEN DIVISION NO. 5, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IT VOLUME 11 OF PLATS, PAGE 83, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, LYING WESTERLY OF STATE HIGHWAY NO. 405, AND THAT PORTION OF PACIFIC COAST RAILROAD RIGHT OF WAY, LYING ADJACENT THERETO WEST_ OF STATE HIGHWAY NO. 405; • PARCEL E: TRACT 348 OF C.D. HILLMAN'S LAKE WASHINGTON GARDEN OF EDEN NO. 5, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 11 OF PLATS, PAGE 83 , I KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; PARCEL F: TRACT 351, C.D. HILLMAN'S LAKE WASHINGTON GARDEN OF EDEN, DIVISION NO. ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 11 OF PLATS, PAGE 83 , KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; EXCEPT THE WESTERLY 60 FEET THEREOF CONDEMNED IN KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT CAUSE NUMBER 115311 FOR RENTON-NEWPORT ROAD. ; " LEGAL DESCRIPTION II. COOK • PARCEL A: TRACT 334 , C. D. HILLMAN'S LAKE WASHINGTON GARDEN OF EDEN ADDITION TO SEATTLE DIVISION NO. FIVE, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 11 OF PLATS, PAGE 8], IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; EXCEPT THAT PORTION THEREOF LYING EASTERLY OF THE WESTERLY MARGIN. OF PRIMARY STATE HIGHWAY NO. 1 (SR 405) AS ESTABLISHED BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 4683135. PARCEL B: TRACT 335, C. D. HILLMAN'S LAKE WASHINGTON GARDEN OF EDEN ADDITION TO SEATTLE DIVISION NO. FIVE, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 11 OF PLATS, PAGE 83, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; EXCEPT THAT PORTION THEREOF LYING EASTERLY OF THE WESTERLY MARGIN OF PRIMARY STATE HIGHWAY NO. 1 (SR 405) AS LSTABLISITYD BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 4682225; TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF THE PACIFIC COAST RAILROAD COMPANY'S • • NEWCASTLE BRANCH RIGHT OF WAY, BEING A STRIP OF SAID RICHT OF WAY 200 FEET IN WIDTH, 100 FEET OF SUCH WIDTH LYING ON ZITHER SIDE OF THE CENTERLINE OF SAID RIGHT OF WAY, AS THE SAME WAS LOCATED ON OCTOBER 13, 1946 AND BOUNDED ON THE NORTH BY THE SOUTHERLY LINE or TRACT 333, C. D. HILLMAN'S LAKE WASHINGTON GARDEN OF EDEN ADDITION TO SEATTLE DIVISION HO. FIVE, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 11 OP PLATS, PAGE 83, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, PRODUCED WESTERLY OVER AND ACROSS SAID RIGHT OF WAY, AND ON THE SOUTH BY THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF TRACT 336 07 SAID PLAT, PRODUCED WESTERLY OVER AND ACROSS SAID RIGHT OF WAY; EXCEPT THAT PORTION THEREOF LYING EASTERLY OF THE WESTERLY MARGIN or PRIMARY STATE HIGHWAY NO. 1 (SR 405) AS ESTABLISHED BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 4648616. PARCEL C: • • THAT PORTION OF THE PACIFIC COAST RAILROAD COMPANY'S RIGHT OF WAY IN SECTION 3, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAHETTE MERIDIAN, IN XING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, LYING BETWEEN THE NORTH AND SOUTH MARGINS OF THIRD AVENUE, EXTENDED TO THE WEST, AS DELINEATED ON C. D. HILLMAN'S LAZE WASHINGTON GARDEN OF EDEN ADDITION TO SEATTLE DIVISION HO.. FIVE, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 11 OF PLATS, PACE 83, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, AND LYING WESTERLY OF A LINE DRAWN PARALLEL WITH AND 180 FEET WESTERLY, WHEN KEASURED RADIALLY, FROM THE LINE OF SURVEY OF SR 405, RENTON TO KENNYDALE. 4tMIP LEGAL DESCRIPTION III. LOTTO/SEGUR LOTS 352 AND 353, C. D. HILLMAN'S LAKE WASHINGTON GARDEN OF EDEN DIVISION NO. 5, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 11 OF PLATS, PAGE 83 , IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; EXCEPT THAT PORTION THEREOF CONVEYED TO KING COUNTY FOR NEWPORT-RENTON ROAD BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 1036529 . LEGAL DESCRIPTION Yi 1 IV. MATSUOKA LOT 344 HILL`IANS LK WN GARDEN OF EDEN #5 LY WLY OF ST HWY NO 2-A TGW POR OF PC R/W IN SW 1/4 OF SEC 05-23-05 ADJ LY BTW N & S LNS SD TR 320 PROP WLY t 1 IIF r LEGAL DESCRIPTION ;r V. MARTINDALE Legal description of property (if more space Is required, pima attach a separate sheet). PARCEL A TRACT 349 C. D. HILLMAN'S LAKE WASHINGTON GARDEN OF EDEN DIVISION NUMBER 5 ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 11 OF PLATE. PAGE 67. IN KING COUNTY. WASHINGTON; TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF VACATED 104TH AVENUE SOUTHEAST (LAKE VIEW BOULEVARD). VACATED BY THE CITY OF RENTON UNDER ORDINANCE NUMBER 2938. THAT WOULD ATTACH THERETO BY OPERATION OF LAW, TOGETHER WITH AN EASEMENT FOR INGRESS AND EGRESS OVER THE SOUTH 50 FEET OF TRACT 351 CF SAID PLAT. PARCEL B TRACT 350 C. D. HILLMAN'8 LAKE WASHINGTON GARDEN OF EDEN DIVISION NUMBER 5 ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 11 OF PLATS. PAGE 83. IN KING COUNTY. WASHINGTON; TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF VACATED 104TH AVENUE SOUTHEAST (LAKE VIEW BOULEVARD) VACATED DY THE CITY OF RENTON UNDER ORDINANCE NUMBER 2958. THAT WOULD ATTACH THERETO BY OPERATION OF LAW. PARCEL C TRACTS 347 AND 346 C.D. HILLMAN'S LAKE WASHINOTON'QAROEN OF EDEN DIVISION , NLhDER 3 ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 11 OF PLATS. RAGE 83. IN KINQ COUNTY. WASHINGTON; TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF VACATED 104TH AVENUE SOUTHEAST (LAKE VIEW BOULEVARD). VACATED DY THE CITY OF RENTON UNDER ORDINANCE NUMBER 4029. THAT WOULD ATTACH THERETO DY OPERATION OF LAW. AS SAID PROPERTY IS DEPICTED ON KING COUNTY SURVEY RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 8506249011 AND DESCRIBED DY KING COUNTY BOUNDARY LINE AGREEMENT RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 850L240829. PARCEL D • THAT PORTION GP THE RICHT OF WAY 200.00 FEET IN WIDTH DELINEATED ON C.D. HILLmAN'S LAKE WASHINGTON GARDEN OF EDEN DIVISION NUMBER a. ACCORDING TO • THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 11 OF PLATS. PAGE 23. IN KING COUNTY. WASHIN01 ON. AS "C AND P. S.R.R." LYING BETWEEN THE EASTERLY PRODUCTION OF THE NORTH LINE OF TRACT 350 OF SAID PLAT ANO THE WESTERLY PRODUCTION OF THE SOUTH LINE OF TRACT 317 OF SAID PLAT; EXCEPT THAT PORTION THEREOF CONVEYED TO THE STATE OF WASHINGTON FOR HIGHWAY PURPOSES BY DEEDS RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBERS 4668942 AND 6014674. AFFIDAVIT • I, .1 m A c M r t i n ci 1 P being duly sworn, declare that I am (please check ono) the authorized representative to act for the property owner, X the owner of the t, property involved in this application and that the foregoing statemen and answers her in contained and the information herewith submitted are In all respects true and correct to the but of my knowledge and belief. • • SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS . 9th DAY OF October 19 89 . • • • NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR THE STATE OF WASHINGTON. RESIDING AT: • Issa Washington 98027 j 24 ( m -o Notary Public) Gregg C. MacDonald (S nature of Owner) • `�_ • • I • • • AFFIDAVIT • I, N a n c G lads *o & J o c e S e u r , being duly sworn, declare that I am (please check one) the authorized representative to act for the property owner, x the owner of the property involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers hsr n contalnad and the information herewith submitted are In all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS • 9th DAY OF October I9 89 • NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, RESIDING AT: • Issaquah. Washington . 6-6 -0771 (Karla-elf Notary Public)G r e g g C. Ma c D o n a l d�����'1 (Sin ` of Owner) P. O. Box 983 l(<' /ioo 4r (Address) (Address) Jed,s Issaquah, WA 98072 • „9_-04/11) bJa, PO j <<;,q (City/State/Zip) (City/Stats/ZIp) ( 206) 392-5455 v2.0 ,2 6-y 5- 6.06.) 3- sg (Telephone) • (Telephone) Acceptance of this application and required filing fee does not constitute a complete application. Plans ant other material required to constitute a complete application are listed in the "Application Procedure' RtnMastr Revised 5/89 • 1 • • • AFFIDAVIT Paul i n e H. K i r k m a n , being duly sworn, declare that I am (please check one) the authorized representative to act for the property owner, X :the owner of the property involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herin contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. • SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS • 9th DAY OF October 1989 • • • NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, RESIDING AT: Issa uah, Washington. "17,-;(4/ .>/— 7/1;4 Notary Public Gregg C. MacDonald (Signature of Owner) P. O. Box 983 %,log- ,V. -3-1`74'• (Address) (Address) , Issaquah, WA 98027 )4hreii h2 - yPdJ6 (City/State/Zip) • (City/State/Zip) • ( 206)392-5455 - 7.2 �. " (Telephone) (Telephone) • Acceptance of this application and required filing fee does not constitute a complete application. Plans and other material required to constitute a complete application are listed in the-"Application Procedure." RtnMastr • Revised 5/89 PARCEL B TRACT,' C. D. HILLMAN•S LAKE WASHINGTON OAR DEN :DEN DIVISION NUMBER S ACC NG TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN NOEL: ;1 OF PLATS. PAGE 83. IN KrmiCOUNTY. WASHINOTONi TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF VACATED 104TH AVENUE SOUTHEAST (LAKE VIEW BOULEVARD) VACATED DY THE CITY OF RENTON UNDER ORDINANCE NUMBER 2938. THAT WOULD ATTACH THERETO BY OPERATION OF LAW. PARCEL C TRACTS 345 AND 346 C.D. HILLMAN'3 LAKE WASHINGTON'GARDEN OF EDEN DIVISION NUMBER S ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 11 OF PLATS. RAGE 83. IN KIND COUNTY. WASH!NO TONI TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF VACATED 104TH AVENUE SOUTHEAST (LAKE VIEW BOULEVARD). VACATED BY THE CITY OF RENTON UNDER ORDINANCE NUMBER 4029. THAT WOULD ATTACH THERETO BY OPERATION OF LAW. AS BA ID PROPERTY IS DEPICTED ON KIND COUNTY SURVEY RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 8506249011 AND DESCRIBED BY KING COUNTY BOUNDARY LINE AGREEMENT RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 8304240829. PARCEL D • THAT PORTION OF THE RIGHT OF WAY ZOO.00 FEET IN WIDTH DELINEATED ON C.O. HILLMAN•3 LAKE WASHINGTON GARDEN OF EDEN DIVISION NUMBER 3. ACCORDING TD THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 11 OF PLATS. PAGE 113. IN KING COUNTY, WASH INO1ON. AS "C AND P. S.R. R. " LYING BETWEEN THE EASTERLY PRODUCTION OF THE NORTH LINE OF TRACT 350 OF SAID PLAT AND THE WESTERLY PRODUCTION OF THE SOUTH LINE OF TRACT 317 OF SAID PLAT) EXCEPT THAT PORTION THEREOF CONVEYED TO THE STATE OF WASHINGTON FOR HIGHWAY PURPOSES BY DEEDS RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBERS 4666942 AND 6014874. AFFIDAVIT I. ti amp e , being duly sworn, declare that I ■m (please check one) the authorized representative to act for the property owner, the owner of the property involved in this application rind that the foregoing statements and answers hXer contained and the information herewith submitted are In all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS • 9th DAY OF October 19 89 • • • NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, RESIDING AT: Issa u Wa hin ton 98027 1/6/ (d:F75% ( m -o Notary Public) Gregg C. MacDonald (S nature of Owner) P. O. Box 983 17Ia. 'N? (Addreu) (A rim) Issaquah, WA 98027 atao`TdSt/ COLA 7.8oz-0 (City/State/Zip) (City/State/Zip) • ( 206) 392-5455 2 -- S'`4 Z ^� / (Telephone) (Telephone) Acceptance of this application and required filing fee does not constitute a complete application. Plans ar other material required to constitute a complete application are listed In the 'Application Procedure" RtnMastr Revised 5/89 • DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET tin*NG DFc .,4 APPLICATION NO: ECF;R;SA-044-89 "992 PROPONENT: Colin Quinn Cki `� . PROJECT TITLE: The Bluffs,A Residential Condominium Community BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Contract Rezone and Site Plan Approval to allow construction of a residential condominium complex consisting of six residential condominium buildings containing a total of 165 dwelling units, a recreation center and parking for 368 vehicles. The units are slated for sale to middle to upper income market. The site contains 22.6 acres and approximately 11.2. acres would be developed in buildings, parking, utilities, trails and drives and re-landscaped open space. Approximately 11.4 acres or 51 percent of the site would be left as natural open space. Recreational amenities include a recreation center, swimming pool, pedestrian walkway system, public trail and natural open space. The proposal would incorporate design elements similar to the architecture in Gene Coulon Park, providing a synergistic relationship between the complex and the nearby park. The proposed entrance driveway has been revised to provide 24 foot wide with an internal turnaround for emergency vehicles. The revised access plan retains the secondary emergency access road at the north end of the site. LOCATION: Between Lake Washington Boulevard North and 1-405, east of Gene Coulon Memorial Beach Park TO: PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION SCHEDULED TAC DATE: DECEMBER 1 ENGINEERING SECTION TRAFFIC ENGINEERING SECTION UTILITIES ENGINEERING SECTION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION CONSTRUCTION FIELD SERVICES DEVELOPMENT PLANNING PLANNING &TECHNICAL SERVICES PARKS& RECREATION DIVISION OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE-PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE DEVELOPMENT PLANNING SECTION BY 1:30 PM ON DECEMBER 1. [SORRY ABOUT THE SHORT REVIEW TIME, BUT YOUR COMMENTS ARE NEEDED FOR INCLUSION IN THE THE DECEMBER 8 STAFF REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER FOR THE DEC 15TH PUBLIC HEARING. THANK YOU FOR YOUR COOPERATION. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS CALL ME AT 6167. PAUL FORSANDERJ devrvsht • Rev.3/92 tl The Bluffs, A Residial Condominium Community ECF;R;SA-044-89 pEVIEWIN EPARTMENT/DIVISION: tTVA Ii APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED II „,7„/ fp 2)-J, .24:// e4;v__ s6: DATE: 1/, /0 - SIGNATURE OF DIR c CTOR OR AUTHr IZED REPRESENTATIVE i • devrvsht Rev.3/92 • T•.T.T :if:: :: - .d2.t:•:::•rr;: •r::•: :•ii.*X •i:i*K o-:•:: •. : •::.i•.:-. .::. T _ ss .i. s i_ Y.•i 't V _ _ _ _ • _ ��Q :iS.L _ _•�V_.fir:: - onlithe o�-1 tday of "C�ecew�be� , 19 12.., demosi tad in the nails of the United States a sealed . envelope containing fir. lot 41: ' e AtA.Yt • Ev...o-vvttwur "owl P4nr-* ,..L. . . . . documents . This information was .sent to: • Nagle . Reorasaarlt?*1Q • • • 'See. aemc n IisE • • I I . . CS ignatura of Sender) „ �. �.. pg....ir,r Sub -gibed and scorn to me this :2L--- day o' 1-6/ 00 G,ARSr °YG 1 it :oo q , ,: , " Nota ibli 'n and far the • �..: MJ S tat _ Washington residing ;7�,.G . at - c� r _ '� therein_ - oAo 'U• rp .• - : :.:is•l-:::•::::•y.YI.V::••❖.•...�.:•l�:}T titi f• .:.•:::llJ.. .. ................::..............:t:::....J..•.: :{:J . ••_• :..«................:.... .l••J�.....::....� .ice .«::. ....� f:.. . .:.:-:- -yam *--/Luit f Ray Aliment - Michael Hannis,Atty:.. • Chalmer H. Bolen 2421.Meadow N 'Hannis & Olsen. 2712 Meadow Ave N Renton, WA 98056 Renton >WA 98056 � . . - 3900 E Valley Hwy, Ste 203 .�'` ,- - , - - ' Renton,-WA 98055 - Ralph Evans Joan M.Jensen John•Phillips 3306 NE 11th PI 2721 Meadow Ave - - Phillips&-Wilson Renton, WA 98056 Renton,WA 98056 - 2001 Western Ave, #500 Seattle, WA 98121' • Edward.Scheiner - Joanne Stewart Rich Wagner 3312 Lk Wash Blvd N 3233 Mount Ave N , i 1321 S 7th St "Renton, WA 98056 - Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98055' Graham Bell Ida Wooden Mr/Mrs L.E. Graves 807.N.33rd 3901 Park Ave N 905 N 28th PI Renton, WA 98055- Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Leslie Lloyd Helen Shook Dean Radford ' The Ferris Company 1405 N 24th Valley Daily News ( 10655 NE 4th, Ste 506 Renton, WA 98056 PO Box 10 , ,- Bellevue, WA 98004 Kent, WA 98056 r � Mr/Mrs Glen Yargen Cindy Smith George Spencer 703 N 29th 1733 Jones Ave NE i 1809 Jones Ave NE - Renton, WA 98056 - Renton, WA 98056 • Renton, WA 98056 Stuart Dooley Darrell Igelmund, President Angela Mohr 2003 NE 16th N Renton/Kennydale Def Fund ' 2100 Lk sh Blvd N, #92 Renton, WA 98056 • Rento A 98056 3602 Lk Wash'Blvd N , Renton, WA 98056 _ "--David R. Sager Darryl Smith Versie Vaupel 1025 N 28th PI 1733 Jones Ave NE PO'Box 755 Renton, WA 98056 , Renton, WA 98056 i Renton, WA 98057 Jane Tobin Jack Leach Chan Betts 7662 S 135th Seattle Times 1014 N 30th Seattle, WA 98178 622 S 320th Renton, WA 98056 Federal Way, WA 98003 • Sill Heath 1 ; 308 Stevens Ave SW , Renton, WA 98055 , - i , - niiiili DEVELQ:PMEN.. :SER. . C. S . ... . . . N< > : < iAi RE OWNER :::><> > >`:.:m < : O:F:NOTI:FICATI:ON:::OF:RRO .. RTY.. . ... . .. ........ ***FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY*** CITY OFRENTON �y� RECEIVE® PROJECT NAME: C lB`qa APPLICANT: "CDtth Clw0.001 DEC 1992 APPLICATION NO(S): � CZ,5k 044 —gi BUILDING DIVISION n The following is a list of property owners within 300 feet of the subject site. The Development Services Division will notify these individuals of the proposed development. ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NAME ADDRESS , ; NUMBER' Ms. Sierra N. Jackson 1322 Lake WA Blvd N Renton 98056 334450-0005-03 Don and Marge Schumsky 2019 Jones Ave NE Renton 98056 334450-0007-01 • P. Kirkman & F. Kulle, Hazel, ted,. Tom 6901 37th Ave SW Seattle 98126 - .334450-0050-07 Gary Land & Sally Long_ 11404 137th Ave SE Renton 98055 334450-0(?�5 '.'1'Sr'', - Darlene S. Bassett 1513' Jones Ave N E Renton 98056 33445Q,-'iR6=0,7...Z ,I`T.., MR & MRS James L Marenakos 1323 N 28th Renton 98055' 33445,J If7�R,1 ' ; ''OJ1/ .' Francisco T. Suarez ' ' 1617 Jones Ave NE 1 Renton 98055 ' 3344. CSQCA5,—*61•'1 Puget Sound Power & Light Co. , Tax Dept Puget POwer Building Bellevue 98009 334-4.50-0,�06- .;,02J Beatrice P. Lewis 1401 Jones Ave NE Renton 98055 3344:50—LG'40'05 �,,: Marian Strutynski 14 Newport Key ,Bellevue 98056 33445'0.,-- 05,1A-05 \,,..; James & Helen Carver 1507 Jones Ave NE ,Renton 98056 334450,70,0'7J '=t,8':1 � .•`` Pauline H. Kirkman 1002 N 35th Renton 98056 334450-0080,;;;C',1;,,,::�''' 0084-07 0093-06 Rol l-is Horton . 1533 Jones Ave NE, Renton 98055 . 334450-0082-09 A A Ames •. . ,. 1609 Jones Ave NE -Renton.'.98055 334450-0086-05 James W. Daniels 1707 'Jones Ave NE Renton '98,056 334450-0090-09 Harry T. Lambro 1633 Jones Ave NE Rento.n 98055 334450-0092-07 H. N. Shearer 1725 Jones Ave NE Renton 98055 , 334450-0097-02 Lucien W. Lemon 1801 Jones' Aye NE Renton 98056 ' 334450-0101-06 J. J. Jorgensen : 1901 ..Jones Ave NE Renton 98055 334450-0116-09 Howard H. Hawken _1917-.Jones Ave NE' Renton.,98055 334450-0121-02 George A. Fanning :.:,." > '2021`Jones Ave NE Renton 98055 '334450-0126-07 Elmer C. Penney Jr.. " , ';; `:'---- 1625 Jones Ave 'NE Renton 98055 , 334450-0091-08 Darryl J. Smith . 1733 Jones Ave NE Renton-.98055 334450-0095-04 ' George W. Spencer 1809, ,Johes Ave NE Renton 98056 ' 33'4450-0100-07 Anthony J. Porcel 1 o , ,` • „ 1,817:. Jones Ave NE ,Renton 98056` 334450-011'5-00 Elmer Pistoresi ' '' ' ' 1909' JOnes Ave NE Renton 98055 334450-01,20-03 Donald Schumsky ' "`;2019 Jones Ave NE Renton 98055 -. 334450-01'25-08 0131-00 Wyman Dobson 821 N 1st Street Renton: 98055 334450-0130-01 Alexander V. & Mary Quincey 2025 Jones Ave NE 'Renton 98056 " 334450-0140-09 William M. Sparrow 2033 Jones NE Renton 98055 334450-0181-09 Lynn A. Chavis 2216 High Ave NE' Renton 98056 334450-01.89-01 George C. Preston 2217 Jones Ave NE .Reriten 98055 • 334450-0191-07 R. N. Ratray 2301 JOnes Ave NE 'Renton 98055 334450-0210-04 Debora Kay Holt 2124 High Ave NE Renton 9805E llaa;n_n712_n9 ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NAME ADDRESS NUMBER Duane W. & Patricia M. Amick 1601 NE 24th ST Renton 98055 334459 02�0='02 Esther L. Holt 2124 High Ave NE Renton 98055 334450-0180-00 R. Knuds'on 2116 High Ave NE Renton 98055 334450-0183-07 Kenneth �Jackson Stewart, Jr. 2132 High Ave NE Renton 98055 334450-0190-08 Martin J. Ulrich 2209 Jones Ave NE Renton 98056 334450-0192-06 Moon S. Ean 2300 High Ave NE Renton 98055 334450-0211-03 James R. & Margaret L. Hanson 1802 C ST SE #B Auburn 98002 334450-0213-01 Don Male�tt'a 1509 N 24th Renton 9805b 334450-0230-00 Michael �G. Mul,li'naux 1415 N 24th Renton 98056 334450-0234-06 Helen E. 'Shook 1405 N .24th Renton :98056 334450-0236-04 Sam Abbey 22015 98th PL W Edmonds 98020. 334450-0290-07 Toru Matsuoka 5150 S Orcas ST Seattle 98118 334450-0340-07 Douglas 'M. Buck . 8805 S 121st Seattle 98178 334450-0365-07 James Martindale Est of Robert M. 9712 237th P1 SW Edmonds 98020 334450-0390-06 W. E. Bennett/Deputy Fin. CIty of Renton 200 Mill Ave S Renton. 98055 334450-0775-01 9015-0 229650-0 56-01 Leonard F. Holma 1409 N 24th ST Renton 98056 334450-0235-05 L. C. Walt 1311 N 26th ST Renton 98056 334450-0250-05 Certification 0250-88 I, , herebycertifythat the above lists of adjacent ro e o ers and t eir addressee ere taken from the records of the King County Assessor as prescribed by law. ATTEST:.Subscribed and sworn to before me, a ,, I:Notary Public, in and for the State of Washinon, residihr • ;aft . on the : i Od8.01�l'Nt�a`�' Signed: /�MM' 2'�-: . >::»:::;<<z ««»::;»: »>:>:>::»::>:::<::«::;::::::::::>: >:>: :::>:.CERTIFI.GATLOfV;:FR....A LiKC.................................................:..,.. >nti"n•" o `,• :': f he ed . :.::>::::: hereti :cert':•::ttiatnot ce.o...... . ..... h:rbst :.ad acent: roe :own r::as::;, :::w �::m it :::ort:»»:::<:.::::>: +>:.:: ::::: ::::>�::::>:::::« > : >:«�:::<:::>::>»: ::: Q� aG...... .ed.. . .. . .. ... .....e... s. <:> r s nbed:b. ;taw::»::>::: ::>::> »:< : : ::>:;:»:<:>::» ::_::»::>::>::>::>::»:<:>::.: .. ::�� :•::: .�. .�.�:::::::::::. • ::::::.�:::.�::: .:: >::ATTEST::>::•:Subscribedand:swornto;before::mea ::;: :.::: a: .>: :•;:.;: -0:..:::.: <.::::::.::.:;.»::>;::: :.;:;:. «;.;;: :. ..:: :. Kota,.;P.ubh. .<�n::and:forahe.:State;flf:;Washm .on.:::. '.�::.:4:.;;;:::<�� .::.; ..b:T:.;�..::.::.;::.:; ::_;>:> ::>:.::: :::.:::::::. ................ /� J fSfF}}iii}::i:4i:•iiii:_i:•}iii::�ii:.;;.}•:•;y>i?:4:Pii:?� •:}: .... ..... ............................ ....................................................... ..4•.'fi:}•:'::tii��:F :�C9�:: `�i'.�:{•i: :$�i:C%•ii:•)i:j:?{:C }:?:{(v:i �}:�:<•i:i4:{v:•:is�. ' :..+..non.?::::.., .:.�:+•:.....� v.:.:�.: :.v.�:.v:.�:.::.�..�:•.�::.v:.� .'�i} �}?i:}i};•}Y•:+:> ::•::i:•ii:•:i:•i1iiisi}:ii:.:}iii;:iiiiiii::'iiii:?iii:�: �i;W�'.i:�': ''............ ..�1.•:..� ::•.�.�:.vv.:�..:• �:.:v.�.:�. .�.�.�. �.�.:.?i::i�i::•:�iiiiii .g.?:....M.Mg:::::"yi:::::::.;::::i.:::*::::::PRii:::":::!.:.::.::::::M.: (:•.. ......�..:�:::::::::::::? :::•::::v::._:::: .� ::.:�::::.��.v::::::::::.�::::::....... .... ..:;:.::�. . .Z?. :?::i::? i%fi:: ::i :? ii::::i:�:::• i?f:ii: 1.:;:i::::67::::ipee>:: ::::: ::::..::.:.....'.:::::::.::::.::::::.f:..'.. '/........-......:....:: . — . 's- . . MaiLA01 REV 01/92 ,-. ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NAME. r ADDRESS NUMBER >r Lincoln Lakeside LTD:Partners 1745 114th Ave SE Bellevue 98004 334450-0315-08 James S. Martindale 9712 237th PL SW Edmonds 98020 334450-0345-02' Pauline Kirkman• Et1 Al 1002 N 35th Renton 98056 • 334450-0375-05 . Mosley & Hazel Kirkman Estate Hazel . 1002 N 35th Renton 98055 334450-0395-01 Northern Pacific -RY CO ' 1511 Sixth Seattle 98101 052305-9003-01 ' Roger M., Fleming 1404 N 24th ST Renton 98056 • 052305-9004-00 ' State of Washington Dept of Transpor. 15325 SEL"30th PL Bellevue 98007 052305.'=.9032="06G 229650-0054-03 ' Richard•Basquette 1512 N 24th Renton 98055 ' ' 052305=904.1=05 Walter Grieser 2423 Garden CT N Renton 98056 .`;052305-9063-08 R. L. Wagner & A. M. Jorgensen • . 1321 'S 7th ST Renton 98055 .. ",052305-9065-06 P. R. Watt 2433 Jones NE Renton 98055 Y 229650-0051-06 M. H. Fakharzadeh 11226 Auburn Ave S Seattle 9p178 229650-0057-00 City of Renton - 200 Mill Ave S Renton 98055 052305-9010-02 Gary L. Davis P 0 Box 829 Snoqualmi,e 98065 052305-9037-01 Gary L. Davis P 0 Box 829.SnoqualMie 98065 - 052305-9062-09 Gerrit & .Tilly Bonnema 2417 Garden CT N Renton 98056 ' 052305-9064-07 George K... Grant-,,,-- 2425 Jones Ave NE Renton 98056 229650-0050-07 Jay G. Hill 2417 Jones Ave NE Renton 98055 229650-0055-02 Homer A. Van Ausdal 2422 Meadow Ave N Renton 98055 229650-0065-00 Gerhard K. Muller 2502 Meadow Ave N Renton 98055 229650-0066-09 Robert B. Radnich 2501 Meadow Ave N Renton 98056 229650-0129-04 Jack R. Ring 2413 Meadow N Renton 98055 229650-0131-00 0133-0 0136-05 Gary B. & Paula E. Dubois 2415 Park PL N Renton 98056 229650-0138-03 . - 0140-09 Fred J. Walters 210 Kingston Crossing CT •Alpharetta GA 30201 229650, 0070-03 George F. Collier 2419 Meadow Ave N Renton 98055 .'...,.__ 22'9650-0130=01 Ray Jon Aliment 2421 Meadow Ave N Renton 98055 229650-0132-09 0134-07 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION Karen Tucker , being first duly sworn on oath states that he/she is the Chief Clerk of the VALLEY DAILY NEWS Daily newspapers published six (6) times a week. That said newspapers are legal newspapers and are now and have been for more than six months prior to the date of publication referred to, printed and published in the English language continually as daily newspapers in Kent, King County, Washington. The Valley Daily News has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for King County. NOTICE OF Pus wG RENTON HEARING EXAMINER The notice in the exact form attached, was published in the Valley Daily RENTON,WASHINGTON News (and not in supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its A Public Hearing will be held by the Ren- ton.Hearing Examiner at his regular meet- subscribers during the below stated period. The annexed notice a ing in the Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall, Renton, Washington, on Notice of Public Hearing December 15, 1992,at 9:00 a.m.to consid- er the following petitions: THE BLUFFS was published on 1 2—3—9 2 ECF;R;SA-044-89 Contract rezone and Site Plan Approval to allow construction of a residential condo- minium complex consisting of six residential condominium buildings containing a total of The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum 165 dwelling units, a recreation center and of$5 9 . 70 parking for 368 vehicles.The units are slat- ed for sale to middle to upper income mar- ket. The site contains 22.6 acres and approximately 11. acres would, b s devel- J` oped in buildings2, parking utilities, trails and drives and re landscaped open space. Approximately 11.4 acres or 51 percent of Subscribed and sworn before me this 1 0 t h day of D e c 19�j2 the site would be left as natural open space. / Recreational amenities include a recreation / center, swimming pool, pedestrian walkway system,public trail and natural open space. l �l� lPi The proposal would incorporate design ele ments similar to the architecture in Gene Coulon Park, providing a synergistic rela- otary Public for the State of Washington tionship between the complex and the near- residing at Kent by park. The proposed entrance driveway KingCount Washington has been revised to provide 24 foot wide y g with an internal turnaround for emergency vehicles. The revised access plan retains VDN#87 Revised 8/91 the secondary emergency access road at the north end of the site. The project is located between Lake Washington Boule- vard North and 1-405, east of Gene Coulon Memorial Beach Park. Legal descriptions of the files noted above are on file in the Development Ser- vices Division,Third Floor, Municipal Build- ing, Renton. All interested persons to said petitions are invited to be present at the Public Hear- ing on December 15, 1992, at 9:00 a.m.to express their opinions. Published in the Valley Daily News December 3, 1992.8363 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON HEARING EXAMINER RENTON, WASHINGTON A Public Hearing will be held by the Renton Hearing Examiner at his regular meeting in the Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall, Renton, Washington, on December 15, 1992, at 9:00 a.m. to consider the following petitions: THE BLUFFS ECF;R;SA-044-89 Contract Rezone and Site Plan Approval to allow construction of a residential condominium complex consisting of six residential condominium buildings containing a total of 165 dwelling units, a recreation center and parking for 368 vehicles. The units are slated for sale to middle to upper income market. The site contains 22.6 acres and approximately 11.2. acres would be developed in buildings, parking, utilities, trails and drives and re-landscaped open space. Approximately 11.4 acres or 51 percent of the site would be left as natural open space. Recreational amenities include a recreation. center, swimming pool, pedestrian walkway system, public trail and natural open space. The proposal would incorporate design elements similar to the architecture in Gene Coulon Park, providing a synergistic relationship between the complex and the nearby, park. The proposed entrance driveway has been revised to provide 24 foot wide with an internal turnaround for emergency vehicles. The revised access plan retains the secondary emergency access road at the north end of the site. The project is located between Lake Washington Boulevard North and 1-405, east of Gene Coulon Memorial Beach Park. Legal descriptions of the files noted above are on file in the Development Services Division, Third Floor, Municipal Building, Renton. All interested persons to said petitions are invited to be present at the Public Hearing on December 15, 1992, at 9:00 a.m. to express their opinions. Publication Date: December 3, 1992 • Account No. 51067 hexpub CDN.,01/4, - -I�iJ ci * ra - 1\i CITY OF REN.. . . TON HEARING EXAMINER WILL HOLD A . PUBLIC HEARING IN CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL ON DECEMBER 15, 1992, BEGINNING AT 9:00 AM ` CONCERNING: THE BLUFFS ECF;R;SA-044-89 CONTRACT REZONE AND SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF A RESIDENTIAL CONDOMINIUM COMPLEX CONSISTING OF SIX RESIDENTIAL CONDOMINIUM BUILDINGS CONTAINING A TOTAL OF 165 DWELLING UNITS, A RECREATION CENTER AND PARKING FOR 368 VEHICLES. THE UNITS ARE SLATED FOR SALE TO MIDDLE TO UPPER INCOME MARKET. THE SITE CONTAINS 22.6 ACRES AND APPROXIMATELY 11.2.ACRES WOULD BE DEVELOPED IN BUILDINGS, • PARKING, UTILITIES, TRAILS AND DRIVES AND RE-LANDSCAPED OPEN SPACE. APPROXIMATELY 11.4 ACRES OR 51 PERCENT OF THE SITE WOULD BE LEFT AS NATURAL OPEN SPACE RECREATIONAL AMENITIES INCLUDEAND NATUURALNOPEN SPACE.IMMING POOL PEDESTRIAN ' THE PROPOSAL WOULD WALKWAY SYSTEM, PUBLIC INCORPORATE DESIGN ELEMENTS SIMILAR TO THE ARCHITECTURE IN GENE COULON PARK, PROVIDING A SYNERGISTIC RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE COMPLEX AND THE NEARBY PARK. THE PROPOSED ENTRANCE DRIVEWAY HAS BEEN REVISED TO PROVIDE 24 FOOT WIDE WITH AN INTERNAL TURNAROUND FOR EMERGENCY VEHICLES. THE REVISED ACCESS PLAN RETAINS THE SECONDARY EMERGENCY ACCESS ROAD AT THE NORTH END OF THE SITE. - • -• - GENERAL LOCATION AND/OR ADDRESS: ,I BETWEEN LAKE WASHINGTON BOULEVARD NORTH AND 1-405, EAST OF GENE ,COULON MEMORIAL BEACH PARK FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CALL THE CITY OF RENTON DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION 235-2550 DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION C w-----CATIO-N— � � CUPIES OF I , HEREBY CERTIFY THAT CUNCUPLESO O THE ABOVE DOCUMENT WERE POSTED BY ME INF Z iSPIC PLACES ON OR NEARBY THE DESCRIBED PROPERTY ON brsc ,• R's . �. •�#i, and s,/orn ea Ware.r. a '4,-. !�aSSIO4F�, G .1 ATTEST: m, e U N • C to MacarY Publ[e ' aria far the Stacie of Vasni C©' - I ��� Nor,, $�n residin4 on the SIGNED yK- �%ca N. . day of j' ¶ �/, ..4, • . o F s, -VP" Off. �,,6eOAcWA S1®06 °4°°, M . _ - -- - .• a;ist-rew.-s::.:'.'.?.:v:,:,.+:'� CITY: OF RENTON HEARING EXAMINER WILL HOLD A PUBLIC HEARING IN CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL ON DECEMBER 15, 1992, BEGINNING AT 9:00 AM CONCERNING : THE BLUFFS ECF;R;SA-044-89 CONTRACT REZONE AND SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF A RESIDENTIAL CONDOMINIUM COMPLEX CONSISTING OF SIX RESIDENTIAL CONDOMINIUM BUILDINGS CONTAINING A TOTAL OF 165 DWELLING UNITS, A RECREATION CENTER AND PARKING FOR 368 VEHICLES. THE UNITS ARE SLATED FOR SALE TO MIDDLE TO UPPER INCOME MARKET. THE SITE CONTAINS 22.6 ACRES AND APPROXIMATELY 11.2. ACRES WOULD BE DEVELOPED IN BUILDINGS, PARKING, UTILITIES, TRAILS AND DRIVES AND RE-LANDSCAPED OPEN SPACE. APPROXIMATELY 11.4 ACRES OR 51 PERCENT OF THE SITE WOULD BE LEFT AS NATURAL OPEN SPACE. RECREATIONAL AMENITIES INCLUDE A RECREATION CENTER, SWIMMING POOL, PEDESTRIAN WALKWAY SYSTEM, PUBLIC TRAIL AND NATURAL OPEN SPACE. THE PROPOSAL WOULD INCORPORATE DESIGN ELEMENTS SIMILAR TO THE ARCHITECTURE IN GENE COULON PARK, PROVIDING A SYNERGISTIC RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE COMPLEX AND THE NEARBY PARK.- THE PROPOSED ENTRANCE DRIVEWAY. HAS BEEN REVISED TO PROVIDE 24 FOOT WIDE WITH AN INTERNAL TURNAROUND FOR EMERGENCY VEHICLES. THE REVISED ACCESS PLAN RETAINS THE _' SECONDARY EMERGENCY ACCESS ROAD AT THE NORTH END OF THE SITE. GENERAL LOCATION AND/OR ADDRESS: BETWEEN LAKE WASHINGTON BOULEVARD.NORTH AND 1-405, EAST OF GENE = COULON MEMORIAL BEACH PARK FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CALL THE CITY OF RENTON : : - • DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION .235-2550 . _. .- DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION CITY L. _174' RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works Department Earl Clymer, Mayor Lynn Guttmann,Administrator December 1, 1992 Mr. Colin Quinn Quinn-Webb &Associates 16031 - 119th PI NE Bothell, WA 98011 SUBJECT: The Bluffs ECF;R;SA-044-89 Dear Mr. Quinn: The date of Tuesday, December 15, 1992, at 9:00 a.m., has been set for a Rezone public hearing to review the above-referenced matter. The hearing, before Mr. Fred Kaufman, Renton Hearing Examiner, will be held in the Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall, Renton, Washington. The applicant or representative(s) of the applicant is required to be present at the public hearing. A copy of the staff report will be mailed to you one week before the hearing. If you prefer to make other arrangements to receive the staff report, please contact Kathleen Childers, 277-5582, or Sandi Seeger, 277-5581. If you have any questions, please call 235-2550. Sinc , r Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator DKE/kac cc: Parties of Record 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton. Washington 98055 13luf - Ray Aliment Michael.Hannis, Atty Chalmer H. Bolen 2421 Meadow N Hannis & Olsen 2712 Meadow Ave N Renton, WA 98056 3900 E Valley Hwy, Ste 203 Renton,,WA 98056 Renton, WA 98055 Ralph Evans Joan M. Jensen John Phillips 3306 NE 11th PI 2721 Meadow Ave N - Phillips&Wilson Renton, WA 98056 • Renton, WA 98056 2001 Western Ave, #500 Seattle, WA 98121 Edward Scheiner Joanne Stewart Rich Wagner 3312 Lk Wash Blvd N 3233 Mount Ave N , 1321 S 7th St Renton, WA 98056 • -. Renton, WA 98056 Renton,WA 98055 Graham Bell Ida Wooden Mr/Mrs L.E. Graves 807 N 33rd 3901 Park Ave N 905 N 28th PI Renton, WA 98055' Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Leslie Lloyd Helen Shook Dean Radford The Ferris Company 1405 N 24th Valley Daily News 10655 NE 4th, Ste 506 Renton, WA 98056 PO Box 10 Bellevue, WA 98004 Kent, WA 98056 Mr/Mrs Glen Yargen Cindy Smith George Spencer 703 N 29th 1733 Jones Ave NE 1809 Jones Ave NE Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Stuart Dooley Darrell Igelmund, President Angela Mohr 2003 NE 16th N Renton/Kennydale Def Fund 2100 Lk Wash Blvd N, #92 Renton, WA 98056 3602 Lk Wash'Blvd N Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 David R. Sager Darryl Smith Versie Vaupel 1025 N 28th PI 1733 Jones Ave NE PO Box 755 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 , Renton, WA 98057 Jane Tobin Jack Leach Chan Betts 7662 S 135th Seattle Times 1014 N 30th Seattle, WA 98178 • 622 S 320th Renton, WA 98056 Federal Way, WA 98003 • Bill Heath ' • 308 Stevens Ave SIN Renton, WA 98055 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET APPLICATION NO: ECF;R;SA-044-89 PROPONENT: Colin Quinn PROJECT TITLE: The Bluffs, A Residential Condominium Community BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Contract Rezone and Site Plan Approval to allow construction of a residential condominium complex consisting of six residential condominium buildings containing a total of 165 dwelling units, a recreation center and parking for 368 vehicles. The units are slated for sale to middle to upper income market. The site contains 22.6 acres and approximately 11.2. acres would be developed in buildings, parking, utilities, trails and drives and re-landscaped open space. Approximately 11.4 acres or 51 percent of the site would be left as natural open space. Recreational amenities include a recreation center, swimming pool, pedestrian walkway system, public trail and natural open space. The proposal would incorporate design elements similar to the architecture in Gene Coulon Park, providing a synergistic relationship between the complex and the nearby park. The proposed entrance driveway has been revised to provide 24 foot wide with an internal turnaround for emergency vehicles. The revised access plan retains the secondary emergency access road at the north end of the site. LOCATION: Between Lake Washington Boulevard North and 1-405, east of Gene Coulon Memorial Beach Park TO: PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION SCHEDULED TAC DATE: DECEMBER 1 ENGINEERING SECTION TRAFFIC ENGINEERING SECTION UTILITIES ENGINEERING SECTION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION CONSTRUCTION FIELD SERVICES DEVELOPMENT PLANNING PLANNING &TECHNICAL SERVICES PARKS & RECREATION DIVISION OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE DEVELOPMENT PLANNING SECTION BY 1 :30 PM ON DECEMBER 1. (SORRY ABOUT THE SHORT REVIEW TIME, BUT YOUR COMMENTS ARE NEEDED FOR INCLUSION IN THE THE DECEMBER 8 STAFF REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER FOR THE DEC 15TH PUBLIC HEARING. THANK YOU FOR YOUR COOPERATION. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS CALL ME AT 6167. PAUL FORSANDERJ devrvsht Rev.3/92 PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF RENTON The Bluffs, A Residential Condominium Community ECF;R;SA-044-89 1 1 DEC 0 1 1992 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: U LtA11tTCS : c.(;EIV APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED DATE: 12/i/ Z SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE dewvsht Rev 3/92 11 lr DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET APPLICATION NO: ECF;R;SA-044-89 PROPONENT: Colin Quinn PROJECT TITLE: The Bluffs, A Residential Condominium Community BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Contract Rezone and Site Plan Approval to allow construction of a residential condominium complex consisting of six residential condominium buildings containing a total of 165 dwelling units, a recreation center and parking for 368 vehicles. The units are slated for sale to middle to upper income market. The site contains 22.6 acres and approximately 11.2. acres would be developed in buildings, parking, utilities, trails and drives and re-landscaped open space. Approximately 11.4 acres or 51 percent of the site would be left as natural open space. Recreational amenities include a recreation center, swimming pool, pedestrian walkway system, public trail and natural open space. The proposal would incorporate design elements similar to the architecture in Gene Coulon Park, providing a synergistic relationship between the complex and the nearby park. The proposed entrance driveway has been revised to provide 24 foot wide with an internal turnaround for emergency vehicles. The revised access plan retains the secondary emergency access road at the north end of the site. LOCATION: Between Lake Washington Boulevard North and 1-405, east of Gene Coulon Memorial Beach Park TO: PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION SCHEDULED TAC DATE: DECEMBER 1 ENGINEERING SECTION TRAFFIC ENGINEERING SECTION UTILITIES ENGINEERING SECTION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION CONSTRUCTION FIELD SERVICES DEVELOPMENT PLANNING PLANNING &TECHNICAL SERVICES PARKS & RECREATION DIVISION OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE DEVELOPMENT PLANNING SECTION BY 1:30 PM ON DECEMBER 1. (SORRY ABOUT THE SHORT REVIEW TIME, BUT YOUR COMMENTS ARE NEEDED FOR INCLUSION IN THE THE DECEMBER 8 STAFF REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER FOR THE DEC 15TH PUBLIC HEARING. THANK YOU FOR YOUR COOPERATION. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS CALL ME AT 6167. PAUL FORSANDERJ devrvsht Rev.3/92 The Bluffs, A Residential Condominium Community ECF;R;SA-044-89 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: kofviY\ W APPROVED ✓ APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED CANNING DIVISION I7Y OF RENTON DEC 0 1 1992 Please include as additional conditions: Cti VED 1. Construct on-site storm water detention pond to allow settling of particulates and provide further water quality enhancement by providing an on-site grassy swale at the pond outfall for biofiltration. 2. Provide for a licensed civil engineer to be on duty as needed during the major grading and excavation activities to protect against erosion and related impacts. Please include as note to applicant: 1. Install a storm drainage system complying with all City of Renton standards and codes. 2. Biofiltration swale must be located on private property, not in public right-of-way as shown. 3. SUCC fees for water, sewer and drainage shall be required for this development. These fees are estimated to be roughly $89,925 for water, $44,550 for sewer and $31340 for surface water. These fees must be paid prior to issuance of construction and building permits. I 0a1/1'/ DATE: ) -C `T Z SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE devrvsht Rev.3/92 Seuxr Leh teligs DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET APPLICATION NO: ECF;R;SA-044-89 PROPONENT: Colin Quinn PROJECT TITLE: The Bluffs,A Residential Condominium Community BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Contract Rezone and Site Plan Approval to allow construction of a residential condominium complex consisting of six residential condominium buildings containing a total of 165 dwelling units, a recreation center and parking for 368 vehicles. The units are slated for sale to middle to upper income market. The site contains 22.6 acres and approximately 11.2. acres would be developed in buildings, parking, utilities, trails and drives and re-landscaped open space. Approximately 11.4 acres or 51 percent of the site would be left as natural open space. Recreational amenities include a recreation center, swimming pool, pedestrian walkway system, public trail and natural open space. The proposal,would incorporate design elements. similar to the architecture in Gene Coulon Park, providing a synergistic relationship between the complex and the nearby park. The proposed entrance driveway has been revised to provide 24 foot wide with an internal turnaround for emergency vehicles. The revised access plan retains the secondary emergency access road at the north end of the site. LOCATION: Between Lake Washington Boulevard North and 1-405, east of Gene Coulon Memorial Beach Park TO: PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION SCHEDULED TAC DATE: DECEMBER 1 ENGINEERING SECTION TRAFFIC ENGINEERING SECTION UTILITIES ENGINEERING SECTION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION CONSTRUCTION FIELD SERVICES DEVELOPMENT PLANNING PLANNING&TECHNICAL SERVICES PARKS & RECREATION DIVISION OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE DEVELOPMENT PLANNING SECTION BY 1:30 PM ON DECEMBER 1. [SORRY ABOUT THE SHORT REVIEW TIME, BUT YOUR COMMENTS ARE NEEDED FOR INCLUSION IN THE THE DECEMBER 8 STAFF REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER FOR THE DEC 15TH PUBLIC HEARING. THANK YOU FOR YOUR COOPERATION. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS CALL ME AT 6167. PAUL FORSANDER] devrvsht Rev.3/92 The Bluffs, A Residential Condominium Community ECF;R;SA-044-89 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION:. Seu,Q.le' / APPROVED • APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED cirYompicLbillsioN • ® ' /992 Vprt • • DATE: I /Z ha SIGNATUREREPRESENTATIVE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATI E devrvsht 'Rev.3J92 Io�IC�. DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Cr",nyoR plsku Oec oN APPLICATION NO: ECF;R;SA-044-89 0 / /9 9 PROPONENT: Colin Quinn �e fr Z pIN PROJECT TITLE: The Bluffs, A Residential Condominium Community BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Contract Rezone and Site Plan Approval to allow construction of a residential condominium complex consisting of six residential condominium buildings containing a total of 165 dwelling units, a recreation center and parking for 368 vehicles. The units are slated for sale to middle to upper income market. The site contains 22.6 acres and approximately 11.2. acres would be developed in buildings, parking, utilities, trails and drives and re-landscaped open space. Approximately 11.4 acres or 51 percent of the site would be left as natural open space. Recreational amenities include a recreation center, swimming pool, pedestrian walkway system, public trail and natural open space. The proposal would incorporate design elements similar to the architecture in Gene Coulon Park, providing a synergistic relationship between the complex and the nearby park. The proposed entrance driveway has been revised to provide 24 foot wide with an internal turnaround for emergency vehicles. The revised access plan retains the secondary emergency access road at the north end of the site. LOCATION: Between Lake Washington Boulevard North and 1-405, east of Gene Coulon Memorial Beach Park TO: PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION SCHEDULED TAC DATE: DECEMBER 1 ENGINEERING SECTION TRAFFIC ENGINEERING SECTION UTILITIES ENGINEERING SECTION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION CONSTRUCTION FIELD SERVICES DEVELOPMENT PLANNING PLANNING & TECHNICAL SERVICES PARKS & RECREATION DIVISION OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE DEVELOPMENT PLANNING SECTION BY 1 :30 PM ON DECEMBER 1. [SORRY ABOUT THE SHORT REVIEW TIME, BUT YOUR COMMENTS ARE NEEDED FOR INCLUSION IN THE THE DECEMBER 8 STAFF REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER FOR THE DEC 15TH PUBLIC HEARING. THANK YOU FOR YOUR COOPERATION. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS CALL ME AT 6167. PAUL FORSANDER] devrvsht Rev.3/92 The Bluffs, A Residential Condominium Community ECF;R;SA-044-89 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: I;IICrC APPROVED X. APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED 1 a - r,_4-„ ,,,,,..r,:"7,„„,,,,i, _ . _ - • • _„•••6---., - , r2-C-41;7- ,,..e.-- eZ----,--7 /-- mveY ,i,.e2-4-7>e--- i ,xe7L- 7-e--7/‘. „ ____Ca_e_e/ ./ _ , , "-‘--z. ' . . _ , ' z__e/_&..# . 7 _. 7- _.,‘,......4,7 „a6.7,--,.4„.. „, _. ..,/,‘,..„ „.7„2„z„.7 • ,,,..,„, -,, -.„,,-,- ,,, „,,,fr , --,„, -,:y- : . ,„ _ ---' 42,- 6-Q_,O.2'.O ,„.Z. t .. -�� LGe DATE: .Y7%.--, SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE devrvsht Rev.3192 ve-uelorksudd Th-k-su-410 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET pLA"° ope cN/sroN RFM'ON APPLICATION NO: ECF;R;SA-044-89 ®EC ® 1` 1992 PROPONENT: Colin Quinn ti PROJECT TITLE: The Bluffs, A Residential Condominium Commune y BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Contract Rezone and Site Plan Approval to allow construction of a residential condominium complex consisting of six residential condominium buildings containing a total of 165 dwelling units, a recreation center and parking for 368 vehicles. The units are slated for sale to middle to upper income market. The site contains 22.6 acres and approximately 11.2. acres would be developed in buildings, parking, utilities, trails and drives and re-landscaped open space. Approximately 11.4 acres or 51 percent of the • site would be left as natural open space. Recreational amenities include a recreation center, swimming pool, pedestrian walkway system, public trail and natural open space. The proposal would incorporate design elements similar to the architecture in Gene Coulon Park, providing a synergistic relationship between the complex and the nearby park. The proposed entrance driveway has been revised to provide 24 foot wide with an internal turnaround for emergency vehicles. The revised access plan retains the secondary emergency access road at the north end of the site. LOCATION: Between Lake Washington Boulevard North and 1-405, east of Gene Coulon Memorial Beach Park TO: PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION SCHEDULED TAC DATE: DECEMBER 1 ENGINEERING SECTION TRAFFIC ENGINEERING SECTION UTILITIES ENGINEERING SECTION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION CONSTRUCTION FIELD SERVICES v/DEVELOPMENT PLANNING PLANNING&TECHNICAL SERVICES PARKS&RECREATION DIVISION OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE DEVELOPMENT PLANNING SECTION BY 1:30 PM ON DECEMBER 1. (SORRY ABOUT THE SHORT REVIEW TIME, BUT YOUR COMMENTS ARE NEEDED FOR INCLUSION IN THE THE DECEMBER 8 STAFF REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER FOR THE DEC 15TH PUBLIC HEARING. THANK YOU FOR YOUR COOPERATION. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS CALL ME AT 6167. PAUL FORSANDER] devrvsht Rev.3/92 i . Tlie Bluffs, A Residential Condominium Community ECF;R;SA-044-89 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: D ab, • APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED (i/&,of /5 ��,v /9/4 4 `J e Z"--u,07 D-Ze— '32 1241 : a 41/.7/ Ge- /44?•s ✓S (/'0 w� u‘0.,(q S40r,rli,'G� ka. �%r_ __I / 4e- Zv//ceddar .Z0.lfCada)' 4-v/// ,i- e� �E� t?/�GG''ii/�j tr 4 f e > . , � /ory! 0.1e /0, ity ✓u�'�uc�- /'do G GtG Gc�r� Aorax- // /'GO( iwa/1e e, t't4-ec1r.4 kr, `X-k 4q/6' (i96 /4,04Gas>o.42 v, • "e" DATE: SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR THORIZED REPRESENTATIVE .0 . deJvsht - Rev.3/92 PLANNING DIVISION CRY OF RENTON The Bluffs, A Residential Condominium Community ECF;R;SA-044-89 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: 1 k..11(1 k kACS LEC 0 1 1992 APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED • 10 ifia*- DATE: SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE Rev.= • devrvstrt The Bluffs, A Residential Condominium Community ECF;R;SA-044-89 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: lY uAPPROVED ✓ APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED OF RFN toN DEC 0 1 1992 ' Please include as additional conditions: HEC� VE 1. Construct on-site storm water detention pond to allow settling of particulates and provide further water quality enhancement by providing an on-site grassy swale at the pond outfall for biofiltration. 2. Provide for a licensed civil engineer to be on duty as needed during the major grading and excavation activities to protect against erosion and related impacts. Please include as note to applicant: 1. Install a storm drainage system complying with all City of Renton standards and codes: 2. Biofiltration swale must be located on private property, not in public right-of-way as shown. 3. SUCC fees for water, sewer and drainage shall be required for this development. These fees are estimated to be roughly $89,925 for water, $44,550 for sewer and $31340 for surface water. These fees must be paid prior to issuance of construction and building permits. 1 , • S tv DATE: I?/' SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE devrvsht • Rev. 192 1 • The Bluffs,A Residential Condominium Community ECF;R;SA-044-89 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: Sea.aati- 17 APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED c ISO13Nlslo RONN DEC Cl 1. 1992 • • Ajd DATE: 12/ha-- SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE Rev.Z92 dewvsnt The Bluffs, A Residential Condominium Community . ECF;R;SA-044-89 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: -Nice APPROVED x APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED �/. CG�Z�/GG Cd-71 >yZ�r--/i!`C .cG --: �% 5. c. .,--",:-Zt.14;;9 -e- ' d 7- -LG�� ..- %-, //G r ,s�G'GG c-, Grp — ---1/-- 1 <--/e----67V-' 771...,-Z:e---74--1?7-177--- --Z----,--e-- ;. -e/ - -' -.., 7 .--7 - • % ,••7,- ,-e--•C.-e-=-6 c7,--- -- ----,-----/-ze..." // Lli� ef-��G' -G?-L� �-,Gl� ----.� GCS" SGG �Z — 7/ / G" . i---- --7- .C.-2,g ,/7,:-,, " -e-'-,- ' G":"--- ---' i--" --,=''‘---7-2c-- _.<:'__ -, ' - c---- 7---- , ,,,,,--Z- ...-17/e 'Ilf_? '-'c, ,./ .4."- e.:47 ,...p. ' d i i _ -_,X_,./. -----I . ''- 49-.-6.-'-4'- '7 e'th(7,--- .4?-‘--" -C.e3:-.- G �� Gz. 1„:?,���� ' ‘.f.-r---- . 1-'et. ‘,.Z?..-e,,- .7,, ,,‘,,Z2,4_. ) ----.. , :7/.7_ L--, 2Z;J:;;;O; ;-&--(‘,7 . -. e-, G-X4-e-e=77-64?-r.7f:z- , 2- , :;", .,-zP-_.- - . �6e ,,p'L 6�t � GG-P 4-. .Lor--0.' G� mo ' 'fr:7-1-77-e---"- /zet -r....„-z ---r.,..-,.-7-.e._.:.-6y.---z34:,---", ,e--e--7<. " -- Gli/ DATE: -/A.-- -J9�� SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE Rev.7:92 devrvsfl[ The Bluffs, A Residential Condominium Community ECF;R;SA-044-89 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: \V-e- ,1/RJAA161/1 APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED aoi 44.sz 2- ,dy/4v,N¢-s J 4 R Od wen ezr ,gcezzs �� � T rteA4.zL:s 3) Ac c./514,<v,N¢-s Tv (11 s/Jgi,i.cc. .ry ea-CA,s£ v-7,e✓n•vc •. u) /18y r) Sr�rxwAVS e 41 OZ.-TZe.'£L,✓ � o T T✓ � s'/� LILD N��-�-s.0 yrf ccc 5s LfJi:L�.LU ,r. r , UD r ., E T C.�j kny development and/or construction shall comply with current Fire and Building Codes and Ordi- lances. second means of approved access is required. Fike,Department access roads/lanes shall be paved ninimum width 20'; minimum height 13' 6". Yes No ,,�,�` preliminary fire flow calculations show a fire flow of 3 2 TO e %,1/46. "` J is .equired. �o �rR hydrants witha minimum flow.of 1/ 0f00 gpm each s required. 'rimary hydrant is required to be within � � feet of the structure. secondary hydrants are required to be within _ ?QO feet of the structure. VI approved automatic sprinkler system is required to protect the total structure. Yes x . No_ MI fire department access roads are to be paved and installed prior to construction. Yes.. No _ MI fire hydrants are required to be installed -and approved prior to construction. Yes No . ii-�. ���o _s DATE: //Z-7-47/9 L✓ SIGNATURE OE DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE (:"7 • Rev.2.92 Cevrvsht t,r - { The Bluffs,A Residential Condominium Community ECF;R;SA-044-89 . REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION:_ ?av APPROVED ' APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED 'a v 4 s A 4 .i A.„.../o if- oho'g� e -,-...J ea-v4,s v 1aJAY I'/CI"'7i '�� p 744,J 1 E 1-5 )6' (aci •Ce G reii J- I 77- , / ry�C C �ek, 1 el �u�s C11 Y2C y 7 i•ouy l a h a f/JUach.f /-e' / �'COwd /J H 'h�lq�j 0D 1. ca- I P a.v. 4' W e ti s-t e t -F 1I,JeroJ C fe,e c 5 �p - it 117 e a Le' q/ v --/11 o (.0 7/ s i-c, d'4rk , n , • s p4 / .S l� GCS. ,.au 7 4 iV 9'/44. /P Az-ei�1, rod,- J ' ' ' O,ve/07-! 'v c,t-, wow/e� . /n da,-� -747-4 . / tovt. ,e .V.-ti 0-0 A avvey I ��L lIJ r o ` G/ grvO � /nr� ove�� A ,le- b.e toils i j Ye a J 6t h o/' /c'h Wh r C, cv ci j;,S t4fr L TeavV/2 {'e1 c41-7 • • /' � DATE: /, / SIG ATURE OF RECTOR R AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE IN4 Rev.?192 denvsMl ' • P ' • OWNERSHIP / LEGAL DESCRIPTION I. PAULINE KIRKMAN 1002 N. 35TH STREET RENTON WA 98056 KING COUNTY TAX LOT NUMBERS: 052305-9036-02 334450-0080-01 334450-0084-07 334450-0093-06 334450-0375-05 334450-0395-01 II. THOMAS COOKE 651 STRANDER BLVD. #100 SEATTLE WA 98188 KING COUNTY TAX LOT NUMBERS: 334450-0100-07 334450-0101-06 052305-9034-04 052305-9039-09 III. NANCY LOTTO / JOYCE SEGUR 15706 S.E. 160TH PLACE RENTON WA 98058 KING COUNTY TAX LOT NUMBERS: 334450-0415-07 IV. TORU MATSOUKA 5150 S. ORCAS STREET SEATTLE WAS 98118 KING COUNTY TAX LOT NUMBERS: 334450-0340-05 V. J.S. MARTINDALE 9712 237TH PLACE S.W. EDMONDS WA 98020 KING COUNTY TAX LOT NUMBERS: 334450-0390-06 334450-0345-36 052305-9072-07 1111 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS N -Opq r, DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW wreEritgrot,ityk,. /992 Lk- NOV 2 5 1992 APPLICATION NO: ECF;R;SA-044-89 BUILUiw1/4A uivlSION PROPONENT: Colin Quinn PROJECT TITLE: The Bluffs, A Residential Condominium Community BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Contract Rezone and Site Plan Approval to allow construction of a residential condominium complex consisting of six residential condominium buildings containing a total of 165 dwelling units, a recreation center and parking for 368 vehicles. The units are slated for sale to middle to upper income market. The site contains 22.6 acres and approximately 11.2. acres would be developed in buildings, parking, utilities, trails and drives and re-landscaped open space. Approximately 11.4 acres or 51 percent of the site would be left as natural open space. Recreational amenities include a recreation center, swimming pool, pedestrian walkway system, public trail and natural open space. The proposal would incorporate design elements similar to the architecture in Gene Coulon Park, providing a synergistic relationship between the complex and the nearby park. The proposed entrance driveway has been revised to provide 24 foot wide with an internal turnaround for emergency vehicles. The revised access plan retains the secondary emergency access road at the north end of the site. LOCATION: Between Lake Washington Boulevard North and 1-405, east of Gene Coulon Memorial Beach Park TO: PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION SCHEDULED TAC DATE: DECEMBER 1 ENGINEERING SECTION TRAFFIC ENGINEERING SECTION UTILITIES ENGINEERING SECTION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION CONSTRUCTION FIELD SERVICES DEVELOPMENT PLANNING PLANNING&TECHNICAL SERVICES PARKS & RECREATION DIVISION OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE DEVELOPMENT PLANNING SECTION BY 1 :30 PM ON DECEMBER 1. (SORRY ABOUT THE SHORT REVIEW TIME, BUT YOUR COMMENTS ARE NEEDED FOR INCLUSION IN THE THE DECEMBER 8 STAFF REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER FOR THE DEC 15TH PUBLIC HEARING. THANK YOU FOR YOUR COOPERATION. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS CALL ME AT 6167. PAUL FORSANDERJ devrvsht Rev.3/92 The Bluffs, A Residential Condominium Community ECF;R;SA-044-89 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: Favia APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED v 4 S R J �.v o r o y0 3 ea,/ d `0v i✓G�S !�-v a e !sHve. (ac/ 4- . ? -4' $4/4,a t d jve, fly -M/'Dk14 o el( 110,rad e /,, h-¢1y41,1, el pay k p,(ofrf-'b m f ti 1 raj e e Sec 11 /1 /47 r oLi. 94 �/%� --/y o 4,0A-7,0 (qYJ( 4n , u ce 1/41•11 k-IP u cI A Alt pr Afid ie9ve r 4 ,'- cvoot/d l n g i. a 717-4 el, y,G 5/4, afre- A il eti` b`e 1 ve I ea J r , ,�' s4:h a/h i i-4, wvu /i' j113 efvL "(G1/1VV {^t1 col7<, W DATE:// SIG ARE OF NECTOR R AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE devrvsht Rev.3/92 �ht'w.c.iicm SetU)Ice-to ®1s op9` o')ti DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS ?� ro '9 DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET k'i CITY OF RENTON ��o Rr(° ,VED APPLICATION NO: ECF;R;SA-044-89 NOV 2 3 1992 PROPONENT: Colin Quinn BUlLfvebvi:a LJNISION PROJECT TITLE: The Bluffs, A Residential Condominium Community BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Contract Rezone and Site Plan Approval to allow construction of a residential condominium complex consisting of six residential condominium buildings containing a total of 165 dwelling units, a recreation center and parking for 368 vehicles. The units are slated for sale to middle to upper income market. The site contains 22.6 acres and approximately 11.2. acres would be developed in buildings, • parking, utilities, trails and drives and re-landscaped open space. Approximately 11.4 acres or 51 percent of the site would be left as natural open space. Recreational amenities include a recreation center, swimming pool, pedestrian walkway system, public trail and natural open space. The proposal would incorporate design elements similar to the architecture in Gene Coulon Park, providing a synergistic relationship between the complex and the nearby park. The proposed entrance driveway has been revised to provide 24 foot wide with an internal turnaround for emergency vehicles. The revised access plan retains the secondary emergency access road at the north end of the site. LOCATION: Between Lake Washington Boulevard North and 1-405, east of Gene Coulon Memorial Beach Park - TO: PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION SCHEDULED TAC DATE: DECEMBER 1 ENGINEERING SECTION TRAFFIC ENGINEERING SECTION UTILITIES ENGINEERING SECTION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT �EVELPPMENT SERVICES DIVISION CONSTRUCTION FIELD SERVICES DEVELOPMENT PLANNING PLANNING&TECHNICAL SERVICES PARKS & RECREATION DIVISION OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING. THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE DEVELOPMENT PLANNING SECTION BY 1:30 PM ON DECEMBER 1. [SORRY ABOUT THE SHORT REVIEW TIME, BUT YOUR COMMENTS ARE NEEDED FOR INCLUSION IN THE THE DECEMBER 8 STAFF REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER FOR THE DEC.15TH PUBLIC HEARING. THANK YOU FOR YOUR COOPERATION. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS CALL ME AT 6167. PAUL FORSANDERJ dev,vsht Rev.3/92 The Bluffs,A Residential Condominium Community ECF;R;SA-044-89 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: `1:"St rr WN. SGk1/411C.GEN f APPROVED ! APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED • it)6 cprrn M�t�Ts — l� L � PRo8C 1 CA-kJ UEft(T • Lv cT H. , k (IBC T PCI1 P -(1 ( S P r2OC 5S , • • • • • • • • • • • I i ' I . I ' DATE: WZY42---' IGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE d I rvsht Rev.3192 ' 4' Frek }10M DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS A DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET `�°40/, i nati *ok 425. n0 Ok Z992 APPLICATION NO: ECF;R;SA-044-89 Zfl Nit/ 3a14 k%40 PROPONENT: Colin Quinn t1I3lif3 NO11131 d34 3t1t4 N©1N3� PROJECT TITLE: The Bluffs, A Residential Condominium Community BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Contract Rezone and Site Plan Approval to allow construction of a residential condominium complex consisting of six residential condominium buildings containing a total of 165 dwelling units, a recreation center and parking for 368 vehicles. The units are slated for sale to middle to upper income market. The site contains 22.6 acres and approximately 11.2. acres would be developed in buildings, parking, utilities, trails and drives and re-landscaped open space. Approximately 11.4 acres or 51 percent of the site would be left as natural open space. Recreational amenities include a recreation center, swimming pool, pedestrian walkway system, public trail and natural open space. The proposal would incorporate design elements similar to the architecture in Gene Coulon Park, providing a synergistic relationship between the complex and the nearby park. The proposed entrance driveway has been revised to provide 24 foot wide with an internal turnaround for emergency vehicles. The revised access plan retains the secondary emergency access road at the north end of the site. LOCATION: Between Lake Washington Boulevard North and 1-405, east of Gene Coulon Memorial Beach Park TO: PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION SCHEDULED TAC DATE: DECEMBER 1 ENGINEERING SECTION TRAFFIC ENGINEERING SECTION UTILITIES ENGINEERING SECTION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION CONSTRUCTION FIELD SERVICES DEVELOPMENT PLANNING PLANNING &TECHNICAL SERVICES PARKS & RECREATION DIVISION OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE DEVELOPMENT PLANNING SECTION BY 1 :30 PM ON DECEMBER 1. [SORRY ABOUT THE SHORT REVIEW TIME, BUT YOUR COMMENTS ARE NEEDED FOR INCLUSION IN THE THE DECEMBER 8 STAFF REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER FOR THE DEC 15TH PUBLIC HEARING. THANK YOU FOR YOUR COOPERATION. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS CALL ME AT 6167. PAUL FORSANDER] devrvsht Rev.3/92 i The Bluffs, A Residential Condominium Community ECF;R;SA-044-89 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: \.srG. 14-ettc$A-kInn APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED /) ,6?aicJi.u4 3 ./lc" !70 NOT- 44kZ% AIxrireid/p hzece- .e f.Qwi��N/fa✓i S ith7/4oi ' vs /9 vd Ale Mcf-T /NTe.e/d.t- 4Cce.Ss ,��Gk+i,QftiEvrz F»te <iAeri(�S 3) At /3u'cv/. ¢s id di a)tc. ozv 'J' 'q4s£ pFC—�gvL v/`7�ii9Nc£ 5') /Jc°y Sn9,vo/D,fis.s siteINkcLec ,e641uite..Lt7 S) srA/.ew� w/77/ C,�/eA4-zr Ys 2£.Qkt([f./ 047-at�EL/t/ ,lAN/L.CJ//L4_3_ <s' c ) aOL4¢,QpJ No7- 77) r44 4sdi0 7 /C" To QLOc.¢ �/yE 7) woo .f 4 9/ CC£S 7 L.9,VLs. /9Ooetssta 5 7Z. S 7�/d. oLc%,�eLiu �i"-"IY1 QL .�f47y -6/dew 7 /?4_ y Any development and/or construction shall comply with current Fire and Building Codes and Ordi- nances. A second means of approved access is required. Fike,Department access roads/lanes shall be paved minimum width 20'; minimum height 13' 6". Yes �A No r1 ,t) Preliminary fire flow calculations show a fire flow of 3 ? 50 o►Kax t.w�'�- Cg (o� D is required. F-c) hydrants wi 1h a minimum flow of / 000 gpm each is required. Primary hydrant is required to be within � �' feet of the structure. Secondary hydrants are required to be within 300 feet of the structure. An approved automtic sprinkler system is required to protect the total structure. Yes.,< No._._ All fire department access roads are to be paved and installed prior to construction. Yes X. No All fire hydrants are required to be installed and approved prior to construction. Yes y No DATE: 00 2-- GN URE O DI OR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE devrvsht Rev 3/92 The Bluffs, A Residential Condominium Community ECF;R;SA-044-89 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: COY\S'vUtatet\ SeV\i lGe-IeN APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED VD COI'Yl — (tLC. PRo C- 15 cPrki t64 D -nc:r JCT 0 11JC THE PC9&S R�(if US P ROC S'; • • • • • • ' ail ,4t DATE: lC LV IGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE evrvsht Rev.:192 d ' . . . k ! -. - • . . ..,, :•*$',...`:•... ti,1 I • ..,. ... ; . ;..,.._...- - N.....\- ...'''.1:i•••:...:,..:•:::::;-'",.---..,. ., . . . :: , .\.\\-..',.. .\ \ f.'s': \;•.-.. ' f s's -• .. , \ ' \., stiome /-1. -, "--:••••••••.,,-i i•\ n, \\ `< -I 4 • .. . .'v \..., .‘,... . . .,••X . ; -I n • \\ ' '•--, - .\,,, -,,,. ,,,... --.. \\\'' ' ...•• c s.... 'I1l\;- - Singie-; - Famlty x• ..., ' ...._R-L 1 \ Homes , • ifs ....- ----"- . \\`•,,k, \ R 3 -, , • , , < . . ..,..,‘„,_ ....,. .....„. . 1 1 I 1z . Cn ............... Mobile : . 1 \ . CC ,. \ Home ..\ 1 111,__ , I ‘ Vs .. \ 1 . • c :. %..Park \ I 7, \.: • .sl V; •,: ..,. NN \ I dr- ..,....„ • :. \ kl. .1:. S \ I • A ; •,, •,. .c: A \I , . > ..f ....V . - • •11••V `. •1; ‘ 1 • r i ,::. i • 1 , i U •,: 1 Marina • i 1 i ii ,..„.••• k 1 'Landing f r„ s-i.f.:.-....;:„::::6::....., -:. •. Apartments , *-- ... N 71 •• ; 1 ":„,./ I . ' %.....-- f Z. ; 1 ! ; . . . , I SITE .I :. , \\1 -. A.. •,' 1 ••• \ , --.---... f • r) •:.\ ; sle.-:,.......::.. ',he LEGEND ' -:, i 1 1 - szl.•,:- •::.i i• I= 1 Symbol DISTRICTk• i t • le.,::, '''•.• i o •- . USE :k ; k I.,i —, •. G-1 General—Single-Family : • . i %. k . --. se.3. 4. i ; ...._ . . • R-1 Residential Multiple-Family —Single-Family := k i.'%. • SD-. ..-k.' 1 °ark":\ *v-- s' ..e .c 'R 1 1 .R-1 •• i R-3 Residential— • ' ' ''.) Entrance -1 R-4 *--_,A -• 1 - ----. . [ Residential—Multiple-Family -i..ii ; • .,....;"1•.."-.. 1 '' .1 : • i . 5. i B-1 Residential—Business Use /: .:. , v• ./A \, „I , f P, P-1 Public Use i 0..; .s:-.1 ,................ ; 14-1 Heavy Industrial '; •-; '.. '':•- ok .: •:. .i-.:. 1:31!.1\\ \1 ? 1 ...; , .-% . .... , GENE .1 .-:•:,.\,.......,.. • • . .......,............... A North ; - :...-•COULON ••••••••141EMORIAL , .8 EA C H PARK d i ... .. • \ I VT I ., . •...,• - ' i . li i• i• l'::-. • i •• ; .. '.- I.4.f;1::1:•:" 1:.i.: :i_.'.'':IH P-1 Park - 1 . ,, ., ,---7:.-- • 1 R4 .••• l -•••\. ,,-- r.,...:....., .,.... .,, " r . .. ; H-1 - . . . -•::-:. • PLANNING DIVISION i 1 ••••-• CITY OF RENTON NOV 1 9 1,A2 . ... ,-E1VED Zoning and Surrounding Uses Map ...........—....—_____ - • ' a S -- INTERSTATE 405 _ "s,,,yx,�s,` O� •o Q • <;s'.:` ^,�x;�,�¢;:}i„r:tn .» ,.-}ek;:d; ;,'t;A''K - �+ 1.:�',5r,�f „ ice.*isg::t:;n:fyde �ii —! a 0 ❑ '• ''''' < K,,�,k uKb?i•''''. : ,L6,: "*r:THE,i' BLUFFS' ,A,'<M 'kc✓'tR'., 2 Y ■ .cee�� Q ❑ :sci�'•;i y;,,,,1:,4" :Lf_:, .ti:^:x:_,�'r: 'y= y ;':`ii:,�,:. {:;a' _ of 8 CD AVEN. h ,,•'N1! . ' ,,,,,} ".}� :rvihF,�; w� ;aR✓. Wi • 1 . NEdPOW 0 tF�S r �,irY•. .SJr".z`,'''.k'�.Y+,,\5':lt'r "'<�.•.e�.' ® '.. W; I d d— ❑ ❑ ,r 'MAR/NA .0rF,.'. EVE �..., o // lJ o e •D v. + LANpING !V 9� //O /7 % 0/- Zi 'd 1 %ELOON..a ACRES vzv.r O ❑�T• i us AFf7RTMENTS• ��� �jrir Q�// c 0 2 ��oa°\ P %I) z _. 1 .„, (UNOEVELOPEOJ pco ZCI) q OLVO• eA!ti OEpGN/ � ou • C� d TERPp P RK e10N eua�WCTO ✓ µlA�./� C •j/i VK'�. y i/ P �ycE NOME �pSNIN �/ Epp . M��E E o 0 f /�i ,\x �•1 Q Q P. xpx +x�� �. OPT /E.`_• �i j i \�"i ��\\ .L. ' • f EN ����o�"� �.� LAKE WASHINGTON .FPS \\ �/ \ 1 / I� ---:-..... • • /"-200' I da kl Q „G 0 0• see. Cr / I / 88159 • —' - -.11. ....c... - - . ' ..- ' &;6---"..-. (1 tvi...R. p40,pAGEs :• . - PHUNE It INCIACJING, / THIS.. .7. _.. .. . PA . / GE . • — [— . I s. . . , . , • . , .. — .-.Atir.-Ir2:A.:cla- 1-11G1H-r- • ' ..-P-re.742. .c.,,i-rf 4,.._ rre_aitr.70L1 -011 D . . '.. 51.-Jr1:01E,:lc.i ::re.. .1LAI:losl /• .,\‘V • • . . • , i . \\ \ \`\•:..x . . , 1 . . . ,•"(//f/ i \ , \ \\\*\s' 4 1 _ - •1 . • OE I Ili .• . • i;,. . . i i . -r ) * ft) ME,--• .,.... ___,.,.... kc‘•. I.iI 1q- . . . '.. . l. mif_" 11 • . _-1a..:,.. • 1 __• . . mJoit.I . . • , , .. ......_ • iiiigs■ ._"-=. 1 ti sT • 11111.11111 ii-- • - • . . • .. . . • • _ : - _ l .., ' 1 ,_' ...,. . _ Au le _tr r*rap-r-'serz--6.14.r-1- T' NI dr .10.1P16- -4 illEmAiii 1110401112141410iill."712 _ pm-R. c..11-1 Or' ' 1,.....allpIES=. smor..11111111M71.111avoillIrier.41117., • - taira:,1--J701.1 . E:.1-11L1--1(9 ram. ..% • imIkr r--ti ANNEIrwriIIVIIR . 14a.at UL4.-rioNi • 111.1Itairglit4fAllSjegit4P " • :-..4i6.77. 07_.: (1!;) 5.(.6) . ititikits_leror. Aii._,•104__iksfili..A1011.2_101.4ver_ap. 410.1 •• I Wit1,11.12111%.4111/111,411141,4.7 : `o • liarimsliprifitmally. .(14•Ar•- : _I 1°11111 .11_ 411111,1***6V o I it el GAP axi-upir .., -. ,.- miaashiar_ Ifirldili IOW"- • -.-.H2441417.rit. i.IALY61, 6.4.41 :arm k ..oitir. _ _....N 6oLliTi-i e.i..m.V. . sc.. octi A • 1, • . H. . ... .. . . _ . .. .... . .... ..... .. . . 1 • .L... ; . • Afi'(//CieWD .,,._ , • /41/6/6/417 ilr ". '* • .k. • IC U 0 ®® ." 41fl1 El l01 I n i " �iw CC CC_ - u eG ....KAPI ir, An Ei —, la-E' - . i E I e! i t mF9F p I(ul. ,. _ t Dla Ipi:mE8 5 i _-1 --=. -__ - --- .- atersi illE i S Ii1IIII MCC a ® I J n IMI•1I;;9 1ii 111 a 1 Oil :W_�_ :nnc—f - - I ' 1 pg 1 M Agra�� lgaltifi w WEST ELEVATION • Ahlh.... . ..--o-, a\,711 - - _-.__L., ; ... -- .- - 11111®11al1 0 000 j El BII . I =- _= -uC _— i �CI � i 9LL IJ000 El MI HI _`--' -� la 1111111 DE.0- El Ldir:-.011 • Il R i I ft-07-7T, , *MEI 111.'-±_fil 1-11 .0: q nil Ei ri.-7-f, ,I_ — 1i71 I1 i 11._g vin o ��l _( o_-I1 1 I ��'�14411;j 4 1..=V771xlV/ M'.< �. ; <kFk_ •xlxy I X1Xi,�. iXVjT_ - -_- • l�tri; �i 1 :I 11 • fall ��• I u �j11—:.• =__- —__ __ -- `— SOUTH ELEVATION ■_�rAiJl��r7��"� _y/N ._. , RD s 9D 325 i2�IJJULD1r G OYE.DOIRi�T AYa9Q4RC4� . �. _—_ — • inI I •�1li lili� _-1 r— EIBMINE •==:,,--:.7,--7_-',-..!--.-. t'' -7.2nV. i---:::: ----;-:--- . Ill ..„7_____=:.:777.= . mill I----..1--- E--1 i 4 1 1 _...__ -- I Iil=FIEF 1 ®: EEI8::11 11 ::: 1�1®loll=.1... I• 111�1'1 EAST COURT ELEVATION - ' _`-'_'_ THE IL LUIF1FS END ELEVATION • • —_= in l I 1 II . —� __ IN liiii--trzig _ I_II_ _. III I_I _� . 1 I =--- IN IF_ I I� _: _ -1-1-s==- i= -- 1 �_N I I .L._._..I...... _ I I 111 Ili a _- I� • NORTH COURT ELEVATION I.,UIILWIII'TG • '�liil'�r : iliili iliili� 1h _riliili_.. m__===- 1 i ii 1 IRON] i"i i ii ' iIl I ii iI . I I i-_ I I 111: E_= I 11_mge _1 . . Mill::11:II[ *III nnnt ME©1i :MIU IDi1i • , . - ' ■. urn a 1�1 ■I�. III I I�il��■=I■'1111'■I■■11�1I 1 I�I(L■I�'I■ 1111 ■1��11,_ ,U_• ;=1■u rM :�IilSLq�■•I= . urn, VIEW ELEVATION • 7777 --t.- -: --::=/� _---= --=-__=_ =_l t ool._ I ; al BE _- il nil : „ •0.7,- - —__-=- -= • _=n= —__=(— .-1Ye.2 END ELEVATION ENTRY ELEVATION \ . . BUILDING . .. .. . . . .• .. . . .. , . . „ • . ., . . • , .. . . . . . . . . ,..: .. , . • . . . . • , . . • . . . . . . . . , . , . . , . i . . .. .. • . , . . • , . . .. • . . II . . . I . • • .• . MEDIA 1 . .--• • . .. — • . . E- ----.,T-7-- - .. . PATIO l• . . , 1__. . , • i r . IOTEN i —1' ENTRY ELEVATION • \.. r. . T 1 ' 1. • 1 . - -- . NODE. - - - — • - - - PECEPTION ,IC . ..• _ . . ... _ __ __. ,.. . . _ • _ i I I • -. SIM \ V• H SOUTH ELEVATION • \ • ,.. ' • . . • • . ". POOL DECK • .. .. . . -- I i • - . \ • /7_---::::: ! ;.._;--.7.-1';7-.---_--:-:;r----,--1.---.-:::,...:,i-±‘? --:_.•••'---.;-:.- ' • THE gILUIFFS . ,• ,. 1 . , , i _ MI- • i - \ e• - . , . • . , ,, -- •, _ VIEW ELEVATION . . , . , _ _ __ . ,. . . • , . . • RECREATION BUILDING , . . . , . , FLOOR PLAN. GROSS FLOOR AREA: 2900 SF • . • r& . 0001;1404 ., I 0 a la 2Z „._7,, '--. V-------'-- Li L.' -----....-...' • . . . . . . NORTH ELEVATION . . • B.UELDING_ — — -- — — ---- __ • .• •• . . . • •. . • • . . . , . . _ . • El uir0a0I L di - o0 00 1a= — - - --,--•= . r--...rucEim �-� kT -_-. 0 1 0I0k • :_ 0 _ ,'_zz — -° . i ire, 0+ 0 - --__ . • - --_ -_-=---_._- - -:I •- I •- I, I.- N IN1. NI'I ,i i ,i- 1=[ - I - I . i-,.i 1 . I -1-, 1 Ni ..L 1--siN 1----_ _ �,N\NI WEST ELEVATION THE BLUFFS -7 /!: -- -^_ OHO I ElEl !-DC oE1 o ono - 1 -0--,_L 0-1 -71_,-111 DOD 14k1 0 g_:-77-7_ T - , . .. . .-,,_ . LEE '_ ' ., . . • --- it__ .5:,:t-, __ , _ . _ _ __ , . ,. i ! • _.:ff-_--EE.„t-7.---:-.-__ ..._._ . r. • IN -. ; • [• 1 . 1, •/1 • 1 •1_,1 • 1./i • ; 1 ----- --- -. . ._____ . _.; _ ._ . ._____ . . . 1 _ . ___. , _ I... -._-__.= 7 ' --- -- —- - . J SOUTH ELEVATION - w a ---' I LIIIII�m a 2e ����1.JI1L DI tlG omnawe®r jew�avucva i Y • • -- _I •C ...:_::_... 0 ,...m.._ _ LMMIIIII__ ,___„_...4____,„ r.„-;:.-_:_::: �tp:V:=I:...:•.,-L IMIT _:.7.---.,2,,4--;:. -_77.-.,, _ an. mml =. MMI 11 i _� : - am 01E - ..._ _..■_ I` aMAOt _ 1��_■•L. --® --■.I■•_EMI 511 ��� NORTH COURT ELEVATION ` j THE It1LUFFS i END ELEVATION - • • MI 1 1 l .I -_ _ � I_- _I I E mom - _ _-_- _ �1_=�1 i11---� --_:I::=mil__— ==■ == =—==. p=::_. __- OMAOI EAST COURT ELEVATION • _-- - BUILDING • • • • • • • • = =/• • ••� _—==_ tea ; _ _ -- \! • • :ihip �i _ Li AIMS :liil: 1� 1.. IM O -■- ■_ is MN mil Old r■� 1= 1 1 `16 I 111111 111111 Mt lie FRI o�===_== _- �•.-_-_-_= a �■®. :ii 10112I- HE 111 U. l R i. 111 run l ::: s��[ � i, I l •m EN ��i :i:,: III II i•l:.i • VIEW ELEVATION • • • • • THE ILLU]FIFS• o e w a� omnwwu®r Isre cca Ii WILDING --iiri.7:7---.1•-• .=.7_:1-711-r.---111111141. • • mi =( i�ii�i �i=iii==- =iiiiz���t -L1f.UH11 _°■■■--_..__..._ END ELEVATION INTERIOR END ELEVATION • • e - — - ENTRY ELEVATION THE ILLUIEIFS o :,. .M. -, � - - - - -- - —_ — I-UuD TG • • • • • .--r, ��" _ i : _ .1..11 NAi No -- M. lam i�u�i n imuii .1..1 '=74:1e %FF1 ' __= :11. -:IC 1=_!�! li :I:CI: __= SCIC:1:I:1:1: _ _11 i=C:R C II III ■1Mi�� ■ 111111=- 111011_1Ul_ �■ ■��■ o. I�(� 111111 11�111 kris ��i�l �F�1•.- - .L.I. _ .L.L.- _C - - Ili I Ipl i■i !l!i u i11 a I�hi ii i= i ii i.111 I II!!I .isi!Iil l 1 Li11 i iI1 1i11 • VIEW ELEVATION THE I.,ILU FIFS • o a om sa :wT�an:/®4 ..0,0)0 rsczm 1L:UJILJDJ1'+fG • • • • • - =l = i9■I■■----■■--=■■I■ T - � _-.-_ '— IIIIIII. J[� i• ll Ii���■■� ■�-■Il�e�111 • E ) z • _����_�I '�' =. �1 ��_��M �11-III NM= END ELEVATION INTERIOR END ELEVATION ® Ili -rk_- ---- - ---_ == �_i� ■■■N _ -- ==---- _ • ..911. a a =-_ ±..:.:;_� ENTRY ELEVATION . THE I.,LUIF]FS 0 a 431" sa —1E • ..ArrACHei'.) T c ri-rriOD , CaHGr- r K AI H I P-1A L.L. r ;��,� Coulon ��rk , O.... .0. ....... 1,'' . . . " - M glade • �l coo c, l`oC\� SIU1A ,,w.A- APrRox. Is _.. . �a , 1= i °oir �© • • ��� :: I r 1-,E-� �at2A N I r� f'At� L l�ltrl-I ,`� � yN`11/, API'I-IEb bfZ sAMD� ,6 -1"=b yam.. P�EP�j/i Al� 4 4.-IGi 11101kp'. - �_ II r t SW alo'cr AO) • i - - . Vflii1.o p; - .,• .O . . . mop WY OF RENTON • . RE C E I V ED • . , DEC 0 8 1992 . • _ C BUILDING DIVISION . _ Ffizof7 rY Li t`I.- . . , . . . . . . . . • - . • •-.---- \ .. ' . . . . i . . . - •• I- • . . _ •_ - .. . . - — - - - - - ' •. . . .. • . ' •. _ i . . - ' • . . . • . • . - ' . . - . • • . . , . . . . . \ _. :.;: ... ....., ..*..• . ... . .. . . . .. . . . ....... . . , •"• ...1. . • --k (5) . • .. • . . . . . . . • 'X- 0_.. . .... . . . . . . . ,_ • • (I) 1:5 . . • . . . 4. .. .. . " -. . • . . .. .. .. • . • .. .. ,z., • • ••- V\ . . '. \ . )\ . . . . , . . NOISIA10 otmaine - ' . .... . . • - --k . • . . .. • - . - - . . . . . ? • . . • - . . . . . Z661. 9 0 330 . . . . . ;• , • .. ....- . . . . a 3.A I 3 o Al ' •• NOM-41/40A1.10 • .•'.•.. ....-/ . . . . . ... - . • ,...... . ..,..,.,... ' ' .43E: !‘' - • • • . . . . . . • • . . . . • •-• - • . . . . . . ' •• --. . .. -• . ... . . - . . .‘ . . . . .. . .. • . . . • . . ... . ,... ..• • .--'''"'.... . ts . :•-• • . .. . • • - ...„•••••••--1- • • • . - . . . • . .. , • . . .. .... .- - . • . ,iipir .. . -"Illk\101111111ipow...---- ' 1TOPC: t:) :.,..,..-..: .: .... .. .•. . .2 569, ,__... , . . • . .. .. . . • . . „ . .. . .. !:•!-., ... . - • , . . . . . , • ____ ___ .• . . . ..___.- . ... • . . ..,-_,_::._:___----. • . . , . , . . . . . • _....-,7 , • . . ..,.....,. . • . • . LOT COVERAGE • _ . • .• . .•• .....,. . .• . • . . • . . . . . , . •...:--- . . . , . . BUILDINGS: . . •. • . . S . •. . • . .. . •. •• • • - . . AP.ARTNAFNIT RI III nlm r.•.c• . 1.nry C`t-7 . '.. . . • . • . . . . .. . . SE I/4,NW I/4 &NE I/4,SW I/4 6 SE-I/4, SW I/4,SEC.5, TWP.23 N.,RGE. 5 E., W.M. ' ' S a `'. .11,..`��,mII/.._.11\,�Js..'\^...-./_-`��'__._ l__ `I!N--T E�R'•'STAc T:E�405 -CS i.,. ' , � Q+-`A F"i —:ram——. -�----�-\a'-�E1ir tr'��Gtw,�oe.°•=�?�•Co---_—_-o—►^ A\\ .. -r -- -W � ill , — \ I ( ` i ' y— _ --- /� �� % • r • _ \• '� / 1 "j4 -, \ o."' B ..a°; J 7j0 O�o o ' , \II � !/e� ° . `' ry '•'•. °A \\ l ` p � I °p °�,�'' , ' „ ° ',° . °y \ ` / � / /\ I , '� lir • ! 1•'1;i \ gu i� ! , /".`-_a ' " �\\\ I Ir\ ki 1 ,. " ri�• �� �7 �_ °4r , �✓fr � '7 — \ ° \ / [;z N• s \ ° - 1�,+ � �� % � rC?,� zz r•I �1 .1\a �`' In trl ;� , ,i�o /�) v! �eN �N /J _ /y aY AoII1W ( / "' `�.� � B� . T, l� : " • . Pa • / 144 "' E ." ,\ . /AI. 444P ' 11/ ••tr tl .2-4 � ' l� .,.. ,i Z. ,o V1 '� d�l � 11F54"..11. Y' � / , a •� \\ i.t-'tier _i .. o / / I-• _M= :. I•• ' es. p NLI` _fiS� .1 .'�\.Td oli�:¢ JJ, M ` ; // �� •.. \.A ' �° r��`.-�e r"4� 1'•. —I % Wz� P ,. _� , � d �' f p� \ w v. • • Cr)I �? �Q-1, � , '� ` 1 � ° •_/s.#e.� , ale� ... ".c . . "" moo i a 0 . ,,,W �\1 D yi' e'j.:8. � ij � -i _ M .e nz. IL. \r ^ : F° w l � - c 0_ ,,, -, ,` "7,4,a i ' � ' � ; —J` , a au \\ ' ,., E °✓ == , + / ...., ... a. _, 1 ._ 0-0_ Ui •v ��! q,\1�� cKE/% ter .•— c .7I t u k • - :. •/° / • i. e,,% A' le 12' T . / / WALLY i' ' ,,, y // // GUMOPA/L P aM_- - f-R£TA/N/NG WALL o£i J AS REV In fa 1 1 I . V •% // PLAN �g.31 oe EXmAED 1, e'1 W ^W£ ¢ i //�// I I 2.0 CURBNT . �r l W¢ , t,1 O • / / f i i by ...�.. .• :... L,, N W / ' /i //J y°jf _�..1 Y 1^''�'• /i Iv 'rT\�1,�ASPHALT CONCRETE MKMENT Q �= � CEMENT CONCRETE VERTICAL CURB AND GUTTER l /- • ^I LiEET aF ' 11.E �E ��RETAIN/NC WALL AS REQUIRED • /'=50' TYPICAL ENTRY ROAD SECTION / 2 I 3"3 — . B8139 IEB SE 1/4,NW 1/4 d NE 1/4, SW 1/4 & SE 1/4, SW 1/4,SEC.5, TWP.23 N.,RGE.5 E., W.M. S • 1 1 ,...., '. ___—.___--.____ _ INTERSTATE 405- o o _ .. „--) _ �9 7-4k t 1, - ----\. . , 41 J IW�� r ..r,+° r � �1 \ /r-,, ,, 7°' I ill � �. .� [��w� �v r� .cam �—L': .-J"a,.l �. ° o La z \`•1 1 ( , /•�1 �mmw,►� :— �i� l`i�' _ - �►�t'_ b ...,...„z2-.t eta ":-2-°J,LL _i.'1„ =Q 'p ' '• 1 IC) % (i / / �._,_ 1. vr k `Vl ..e, '- \B- + `� ,.ems, - \ ." r 1 ..., . ..- ,f_-____, ` tom. ..b ''.., Mfg Ay ) 'I'''''' / --- / • • Ana._—,-,- Ili tit 7,4rt.,___, ~ `/ / %� \ /,-;9/4,,) y/ _ --__-7.--,. '--- LI �1 'O of .) i ---- awJiJ / : (-Iiii;' / /Via., i \" - - n Gu \1;\\\I :go pr..-vis,( 4..,:/(T1 :--I.r.,,..____„.......a..----------"—---"-- :0? ‘:t ittiti, , / /,(:-?:. ..---- \ \( (( � � - =:-.. ---::---:--'----.-' .H.„ :;:i. i� -,\= � vto :::.: ):::ii 1. .t.tk!,1 tv Th:1: ,s,:i.,,) z.,,, /V---,- — f\:----- _____. \% 70----lik., ' ,-/, ,. —_ __, \ J \ \ )7/,, ' \ •/ • \ ( b / x \ �o , ram' A ...! 1 ti S / 1� ,� i N LLL //\ Q Y' ID' z ID' 15 e' i \ .�L•` i^,."" ...-WAS Z' ,� y y a % RETAINING WALL /- „ 4 y T��AS RED'D ,1 \ / „'�+ LAKE C\ £2 W i uRro'D I � z,NP* PLAN "a ^W£ .. ,, 20% 20% " \ ti\ W J C u y •• ASPHALT CONCRETE PoVEMEM ci A,�• 1'DEEP J \ \ WW 1�p(y.( W 2`1 Npt I�RETAINING WALL AS REQUIRED ''"1 \ y r'l I Et'. _ C GG SHEET [s EMERGENCY ACCESS ROAD SECTION - 1•.50, 2 2 s'r p 58139 • DODDS ENGINEERS, INC. CIVIL ENGINEERING SURVEYING PLANNING PRELIMINARY TECHNICAL INFORMATION REPORT FOR "THE BLUFFS" RENTON WASHINGTON Pc �J^�`'�' aA! NOV 791992 0 •oka f S 4.v 1J1 Prepared By: Roy E. Lewis, Jr., P.E. r o .. 9 , ,e o:' ' DEI Project No. 88139 `�ssotv�� '�`� • November 18, 1992 I ExPIREs / 8-94i /A/6 4205 148TH AVE. N.E., SUITE 200-BELLEVUE, WA 98007 [206] 885-7B77 OR 454-3743 FAX:[206]BB5-7963 TABLE OF CONTENTS Technical Information Report Worksheet Introduction Preliminary Grading & Utility Plan Preliminary Drainage and Detention Calculations Appendix - Computer Output Page 1 of 2 King County Building and Land Development Division TECHNICAL INFORMATION REPORT (TIR) WORKSHEET PART 1 lPROJECTOWNER AND ' ' PART PROJECT.LOCATION . . AND DESCRIPTION:: ProjectOwner Donald S. Bateman Project Name The Bluffs Address 1266 North Bend Blvd. Location Phone (206). 831-520.3 North Bend. WA 98045 Township 23 Project Engineer Roy E. Lewis, Jr. , P.E. Range 5 Company Dodds Engineers, Inc. Section 5 4205-148th Avenue N.E. Project IZO 24.5 AC Address Phone Upstream Drainage Basin Size 41.4 AC Bellevue WA 98007 (206) 885-7877 PART TYPE OF PERMIT;APPLICATION 1; ':J; PART.'i:;OTHER PERMITS` ' r n Subdivision n DOF/G HPA El Shoreline Management (l Short Subdivision (l COE 404 ® Rockery 0 Grading 0 DOE Dam Safety El Structural Vaults El Commercial El FEMA Floodplain f Xl Other Structural Walls (l Other Re-Zones Application 0 COE Wetlands 0 HPA ' .PART 51 i5RE COMAAUNITY AND DRAINAGE BASIN: ,r •.. .. 1 ... !. � I 1. ! �rr Q1•li�.fl, v•t ••..I t•.• Community South Kennydale Drainage Basin East Lake Washington PART6`'. C.. A.. CTEF#SJI SITT H : ' � � :,' r r;>•, t • ,r � n River 0 Floodplain El Stream n Wetlands El Critical Stream Reach El Seeps/Springs Depressions/Swales 0 High Groundwater Table n Lake Washington within h mile 0 Groundwater Recharge 0 Steep SlopesCDOther n Lakeside/Erosion Hazard PART 7:SOILS ; , Soil Type Slopes . Erosion Potential Erosive Velocities AkF 0% to near Vertical Severe to Very (Alderwood Gravelly Sandy Loam) Severe (Kitsap Silt Loam) 0 Additional Sheets Attatched 1/90 Page 2 of 2 King County Building and Land Development Division TECHNICAL INFORMATION REPORT (TIR) WORKSHEET PARTS DEVELOPMENT LIMITATIONS -• = REFERENCE LIMITATION/SITE CONSTRAINT IT Ch.4-Downstream Analysis See attached Downstream Analysis. . 0 Stormwater Detention will be provided, minimizing any 0 downstream impacts. 0 E , IT Additional Sheets Attatched PART9,ESC REQUIREMENTS :,. . . . ,, .; MINIMUM ESC REQUIREMENTS MINIMUM ESC REQUIREMENTS DURING CONSTRUCTION • FOLLOWING CONSTRUCTION Sedimentation Facilities i= Stabilize Exposed Surface 0 Stabilized Construction Entrance El Remove and Restore Temporary ESC Facilities Perimeter Runoff Control ® Clean and Remove All Silt and Debris ix I Clearing and Grading Restrictions 0 Ensure Operation of Permanent Facilities 0 Cover Practices C Flag Limits of NGPES Ci Construction Sequence CI Other 0 Other PART 10 SURFACE WATER SYSTEM Ix I Grass Lined Channel 0 Tank 0 Infiltration Method of Analysis Ix I Pipe System CI Vault El Depression Rational & SBUH 0 Open Channel 0 Energy Dissapator El Flow Dispersal Compensation/Mitigation 0 Dry Pond El Wetland 0 Waiver of Eliminated Site Storage 0 Wet Pond El Stream El Regional Detention N/A Brief Description of System Operation A wetpond/detention pond at the base of the development • w/grass-lined swale downstream. Facility Related Site Limitations El Additional Sheets Attatched Reference Facility Limitation PART 11 STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS PART12`,EASEMENTSITRACTS,14 , > (May require:special structural review) IT Drainage Easement I Cast in Place Vault El Other I—j Access Easement 0 Retaining Wall n Native Growth Protection Easement Li Rockery>4'High n Tract Ei Structural on Steep Slope n Other PART 14. SIGNATURE OF PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER I or a civil engineer under my supervision have visited the site. Actual site conditions as observed were incorporated into this worksheet and the //�/�� • attatchments. To the best of my knowledge the information provided j here is accurate. sWneo.r. iron INTRODUCTION "The Bluffs" is a proposed high end multi-family project, located on the hillside over-looking the Gene Coulon Memorial Beach Park, in Renton. 165 units will be constructed atop the plateau, lying just west of the I-405 corridor. Primary access will be from Lake Washington Boulevard; emergency access will be from an existing subdivision road at the extreme northeast corner of the property. A portion of the project (Building "F") will be constructed on the lower plateau area, just east of the Marina Landing Apartments. There are four distinct drainage elements of this project: 1) Offsite areas from the east; 2) The upper development and the primary access road; 3) The lower development; and, 4) The northern emergency access road. Drainage from the offsite areas to the east will be routed through the site within their existing ravines and channels. No attempts will be made to divert or detain these existing flows. Drainage from the upper development and the primary access road will be conveyed to a proposed wetpond / detention pond located near the entry to the site. The following calculations addresses the preliminary design of this system. The lower development will discharge drainage into facilities provided by the Marina Landing Apartments. This drainage continues downstream, through the Gene Coulon Memorial Beach Park, into Lake Washington. A review of the Marina Landing Apartments design will support this claim. Construction of the northern emergency access road is anticipated to generate minimal impact to local drainage patterns. It is currently proposed to sheet flow and ditch flow into the many natural ravines that will be crossed. (Please review the associated "Civil Engineering Input" report for delineation of offsite basins and a downstream drainage analysis.) CORE Requirement Review #1 - Discharge at the Natural Location: The drainage basins within The Bluffs project are will defined and many. Ultimately, drainage is collected along the eastern ditch of Lake Washington Boulevard and conveyed under the BNRR tracks into Lake Washington or its tributary stream. These existing drainage patterns will be maintained. #2 - Off-Site Analysis: The offsite basins and flows are summarized within the associated "Civil Engineering Input" report. #3 - Runoff Control: Per the attached calculations within this report, adequate stormwater detention can be provided-within the proposed wetpond / detention pond located near the entry to the site. #4 - Conveyance System: The conveyance system has not been "sized" at this time. A feasible system is shown in plan view on the next page. Tis system will eventually be designed to convey the 100-year storm event. #5 - Erosion/Sedimentation Control Plan: A plan has not been prepared at this time. The proposed detention pond will serve well as a temporary desiltation pond. Due to the steep slopes and massive grading, special care will be needed to reduce the erosion potential. Special Requirement Review Of the eight special requirements, only Special Requirement #5 (Special Water Quality Controls) is applicable. It is proposed to provide oil/water separation, a wetpond / detention pond and a biofiltration swale for this proposed project. SE I/4, NW 1/4 & NE I/4, SW I/4 d S: I/4, SW I/4, SEC. 5, TWP. 23 N., RG E, W.M. o • W • 1, ASPIC: psl6N - INTERSTATE 405 i i i milimm t, ir. It e \\.•. __ i I 1ki __________ : •------- ` ` •LUwMAREalMIM V • ZOO / i //l? 9\' - ,/�,��\, . •-- FENCE oae, ... "I c J? ,, �1°q 9'0 �.y♦ Il �64� oo0.0 0,00. I I I \\ `'.. �/ • I�t ! o>•� .a"• ,i�%: if "1�/ III \• a �J o., 6#OV 00 -- ' > • .J '•—''. 00"' / , ,. ,,, 94 I ` 1 , •b �$+r A °IPy :, 1 /`/ -` g .J "Ias a,J' .;.a J'>°i'c I S r p ri, \004, j \�/ ;' y /m oc. " ,° ob. .Jl CDNC E °J� /�°\\ . l ��d Ptt li,°q,j ,J �� i /BS ' °L -.e yj�[J�•ibyr y LL •,,3 ,��•V- 1•.!• \\ o'y\\'..'�+.J I I 1 I I \ �\ �.1 • '>y r S'b•e.,-Vd_,& \•,..,:, R A/A'/�//dot —_ Vi; .Wi�r-. WV Y-0 ��g4g411/,..�►\i / _ qG Y '!O-/°5 /.r�•'../•+ ? :L6/1/ J °tt `\- `•,\0:. 'E ' I I �i' , iii °boo♦1°' •�> oI L� , - 'r. ' , •• rt .0. • ,A V ca �. ...�' l N,1 t 1 WALL 1 F t it \• •- 0 1 t,,6�•V` 6• \`: ,`� I -0�\ >\°L,.`.\ %eta./ ,1 \6ii; P ". Sz% r:e • •t.•. ,0��L• °• !.,j.. '. � ^.i'kI 6'�' Y \='• / •t7 ❑ 6a \.4' •-b' 1 0 q ^c $ .L�. .i M ` B, .f i/' ll�01 2a .q\ < e A I Z 'I p5P ip aA'\\\ \b.y. \>a ,/90 .I .r, C'A`' t �.A /�_ •1 N _ .M.=��e�.A I)�y \ ro c« - A J'4 II �l'�. /I,'\-•!• `• • i'.' N `\ - ZZ t �q7 1\:\>�° /BS / T- - • _ '/- F ,�i.J ,�9 J35�r �/. / �• 1-;'' i .y / try .(" \� 11• 1 J �Q ] I� I,,,.\ ;—y /B, /71 WY , y, s. I J/j'J85,0 °j /J ✓�0 �••t, r ., o \ ; ° `\ I . jl N lad• o`' 2y'°oa `/�S.Y.'��� • � I� - J ° -' � �162.0 �y�/i ''4/"'I /�. '� fip �' \� \6\\ ( IR\ / / a. wN�P! L 1Ury'- �xoo9I93.17 ,P y, \ W `J_I��nr ��. IrS/ ��, x \: 4.s. 4.00a -r P y ,1\. �❑ ? _3:7 • \I,.y�y 1650 �oro:,.tmtisi:1;-_,., o1 "�' i. J ' �yy�i�._Jgi,./r� M1 I ` IC'�� �j i ¢ Q y, ,. G/T I� ' o`•- �� \EIi.�f ��!' `>••w °o J Q•P �' •'1 �•y 5A,�> '• �a��'e"' . �?<o //�•'✓ sv2>> dt a`Ly •:1 ,`;7\\ \ ',� �/ °� c - Q x 0 - !. gift✓ ° �- 4,1,r -i:c...,,.,. ...\ \dc°°-�t - y;� \ •,e.�0 ° ''� °I a .'(r I/Fs' ,, �o � �' /• }6'A ,t o`.c° o W w(V'1- .'�, .ti �� ,E +�zs._ ar.a.� �.� las,� � �. �/ L� ,�, o� ��\�\ �� .t-� � �/ tt(� °® .c W��iY A a 7C•,•4Y., =tf:il ` A .� / J o: by 2i Io "y1 ¢a7 .'A� ; .° 'o. ,: , • ts ` ) , 4•6, 't , � % 1". ./�/� 1 .J I t1l/ ��^� P IV .' `/1 7.� Tr3 iy. `�� Apo)/'l /�. J\P '' \ °� •,;,„;,•"*. ♦ `�_ i�y�a'-'- � I c �� °� ' •O:q.00 \.• �'��Fo _�j yYvY ��'/y"i i� � �'•��_ 5 ..-►-g/ //. \to0,A1 6 \ t2 I,L>'V V /1 �,`�,; '�_ �1-_;.,, ,- ,:`�e" 'r0 0w • �6 9 _ `// r/�. ,D, a \ 2 I, , ��=i'�.� itl.','01' • ` ,/ U' N W NQ W F y• y� _ 1 i ° _I q M 7_��2 � rs�02:y�y. +!`r ` / ^ .» l J A ti.-� �1 �::_ I Z v m _6 t o A : •P ! .s R// � .��r,—• Q A V PROPOSED ¢ /aa�Q\ \`�.O �t .w O -� ':p�oPA 0.0 y , o. �`���I*i .,. 'I o d' 6r ^cot �1�: 1 REEK SLAT/ON Ww (•/ \\ .,�,, - 0 • co.c• /7'1.. R,y - 2i °"r to -, -".. � -` Eq ..'�. 7YP.ye. 6.�._ *ANCHOR OR o/ ::'�� � I I —J vP wr LaNr / Z IIII -f- d, t .J\ ,J .F.s A59.0 A .e .c �R. ,/op '''. i` 0 IO.. • 6 9 at ��`� 11 a l `_Seh, \ i2\\ ...I A.`:0 „,,o 0 oe ,6 1 I(�a u 6\ A � A, *° J ;1 '•' /A, J I 1>:a.,'* c•t, • `E �_�_ :Z'�- o o y I I II � �• ° 'O X. o 6 � +/ ,E ', 1.• o /2" ��_. w— L7 it \ a c : to 1 e o a °� x \oo ��_ YQ • B"_� O w S _ 6_\ °a ° ' o S h / •Li' ,.2 0 e" TO ExisriNc r, 1 0 /f roe M; o s o --i -�' A/ANNaE 1..'may \ .t• Rh.0 cea` / �� - 9'od c7. >> x 4 °Io t.y_ cur �� W '>0 0 y i ! \g �� je V /� 5 '.h ,0' V ' f/ ,ONV. PE t r ' L•�> F 1 ,>on,V O t ! °> 'F / �•.\ANCHORS \�` > 10 " Ole. 0� °6.,}r 6\y •,,_ :eV/ / �°aV / i• a 'W / P° NT / iE.JJ JO , b �\ 00/ 6►�-�1 '6 ;.:.- W. i �.-_ DIrCN E•2658 4. , o'. 6' \• , X/57/N. ..A•.R /TYP.1 / f•,� _ ° j > OPoSED WAj�R PROPOSED WETPOND/ PROPTIaaw _ 2T: i1 figillEx im.Eraw,vsj t\\*‘"IIIINL.41111k /. ,',) ________.,_ .._.; ; Itto_re,-- • Q. • ‘ \ 411.011.1111 j -'' . . . . ------ ______ > O Q 6 / - _"� / E•9/OVERFLOwW -�� ��' �� EX.B"W ..� i1 h - .�__` ` \\ / \\ �__ _� ��p°�/L/ L. ram` /'' / / / ' SI O �I I �Wew w / / ex. ' TTW v� // / ' /, STREAM' k \\ 2 �' / /,i-I� // / � ' 4 E.Ll BIB Z JO LAKE•_� W. / -.we'''. / /EX B,W //EX 96 55 • / � /// - EX as'¢ 4' I2' I2' 5' .'�/ Ili EX-a'W WALKWAY' �.-- N y R ¢ 2' _ t RETAINING WALL a In ti 3 • / • GUARDRAIL • 0 � "-' �'�AS REV D °' is 2 W / // AS REO O 0.5' I I M�'x• o .WI 3 It! y "W / PLAN 1 j EXIRUDEO I • //� / _ 2°/ CEMENT I I 2`.: °j 2Lai C W / / / / 2.o i CURB I I y -+ // 9B"15 / MPA,F~ /�r v .rn. %�V7,w.n�rti`.J:` �S�a.��r.�� r p C� y PHALT ex.a'W / —=�1t Z I CEMEN�CONCRETE NVERTITCAL CURB N.MID GUTTER m i 2 .4 /�11 L� RETAINING WALL AS REQUIRED Si-EST OF / I 2 I" = 50' - TYPICAL ENTRY ROAD SECTION I" . 5' /;in1ECT f•LA.6ER 88 139 . , - .., . ... i SE I/4, NW I/4 8 NE I/4, SW 1/4 8 SE 1/4, SW I/4, SEC. 5, TWP. 23 N., RS : E., W.M. 1 t 4\, • • - kl\kJ °it L , , - 9 Is 2 '4 • .• 1 ti ' ..! - ) INTERSTATE 405 ASPHALT GUARDRAl p-----0---0--- LuNMARE--.2" . .. . ' . SHOULDER (0 0 0 GUARDS._ 0 _. 0_ 7."/ , , n n 0 ...ei 0 .-0--0 -- - - -.e30 Z----- ->7--- -., ------- -,:- \ 'k - -,.. . V • 'a t, --•• LAW FENCE ",,,,' ' ''' -----7---------- /------------------ - PcJL,10 '\ I ,, \ . -I 1 ' ' '."--- ------ ---' i in-': • .6 0.... -- .. -C) 51.1 It • i.1 Z-' •• ... ---------- •••••••----- \ •• •• \ , •3'1 CCAV,TOSTII ,11), \ ‘‘. \\ \ \ii : vrk._____-_-_-Ei..7.. -... - =71rriPMACC, :7- , - -,--'_-_=16t7/1-77.,••-. =_.----- _--0-;:..%:.:,-,.._::::,e, e:e.,,,. ' . , . . , •&... , -7',.;--------___. , -. ,. , % . v . .• ---- ,,:‘, ...--4,70! •,71/ '4. .,--'.-/„.-.4",-..."V.,,,''W.;`''''''..fr '.<.0'47.! ( / .:,.:•°7,'o''.." - ' 64 .i. .1,''' "1 '''''' ,/---------=-- ,t .---.-. .- - . _! . c' eauo. ...' i 6% 4,••,'"1.1.- . . -.. CONC.4ETAINING0.65t!' 8N ,-, • ----" L.,,i,e"'"------''_../ -,80 ...git. ---,„-,-;:.‘ *lifillii Tii 'K.'sr,rr.' \ ' -.. (7: IP% ,1 °.*.-, -f-e...;. 4•11.111044liairlialitift ii; - 7•".' i:-.4.Wa--Viffik .1*: .,.7' '.• -,-,-Tap_i--K.-„,,,-- '.-.-‘-- ,--_____-6---:5'.1---- -:--=-2-----e:-4--;"` '',- ' `"1:''.\''',.‘\ \ * --------- * IL__ -.-- ,,- • O... ,1 \ I //'is'xi. . .,,,/,, -:9..; ,•.../. ••:..7.7" -c•:Al.:.°.......14-17ilIg..../:,• --:=------/. ."..111°41.21714\193 111111r?••••• :f:: ------------.-:---.175--. '''. -------------- • D4Cr.cit.,174, ./5. 74,6„/O•:912.h.-".."411111r1.411.11°111111151J'41.1""-al"Laile5.74 ''. 1 ,,7 1:4-7 4,61:::\:111111 2 immim.777frif-12""14 .3::4*::"----7:t°TT Ili j 0:El-'Li... 17•:,i.-. ...7 _.XII'i'I.!:.'971;1 CiL-1114*Tjm..-11114 1•• ,:* L::16".""-"5,7.:- ..„..---;7.:111:ri 0.:5-----:: iii:">W:(9-1 (L;j1jj! 8:1 P! ( \ . • e --. ._ --„,, --MO-ACCESS ROA° ------• -----A; ,,/ /A. ---- • 14.:: . lit I \ 1 . X t • / . / 1000074 -ip.....- ,,,, AWL MR/ AWIN ITYP) ro - ._ ,. ‘....,, _ .,,, „,• . ar .7----=----„,- -- 1 CC 1 3 AIM kig ' ) t 4 -1. i E‘ ', //. ' ', i/ : ( ,,..-- „, I , _'''. allh; FF's=1/.72;0, / ,'... .., In I " Pia , ; •• R2,14., . ii -- 00.. WALL- -"-•c•.-o, ----- .1•' -.---' ••----5 . 4tn 6 - Alt, '''.1 •, ,.. '' .1 , ' I ( ! o5 ------- 155 ________. .N \ 01 ; \\ i 1 SED.5.44O5nr.....•- .: --_-.--__bat• 0 0 m cii/ 1 ,_--:-..... ----.-___-:: .,. ' .."---=‘, ---......._ ,I \\ ---. "'1.7.14/ '•-.,47::----:----e*--'-1.4 1' 2 Z 7 al .1. 000 itZ •i • .,,• 1 .f \., ..._ 4.-:-_. • ..z,...z:....4r__ • , \ ... I --- ..---__ , --„:-.14. - wit \ / \ •,.\\,,,, ..... • „..... .......: ,......______=______ ___)„. \\ ..-_,I.,, _ __•_:_-___-__-_,..-:-_,..--,zo it ii p 1 Z I /./..://.)1/ _______..-.__...,_________,,..--- ,,, \ Oka RAI... I\\ \ ; •. / VV. .....-_ / - CIZ 014;4 I 1 1r' ; 0Y \ ( - • \------- _/-'-'_--- --'----. :--.. ..4. ---- --.51,: l'•:::. .••••: \. s..\ N•''''' I -- ,,,,..:•t•rr,..r., ' 15 4 11111' ?elk•••---'''' } >,16 t '--------- , -- .., '-' I /7 // • ../' i-.%--- \ ' " w•••,------ ... • 1 .....,'--•-....... •••,•-• .,_ _/1) ),).,../LpRopomo FRIA q 0 out :''.\ __,.--" • ..• v.le ___---------.-________ . ...". .-------- --itii . _,Q.-- f r- oRT 1 V , \ ...< ___._ ____-___,',,. -.. A/.•:....' :7 -6.--:.7.‹ j 0 5 .1111 .„ . \ p--------'----',, / / , ....- .-.',-•"al - ---...._ •...... EX1STINO COMM f•------- ..„..7.4.''', ),..,,,..,-- , C3 5 1..,z., 111'..---.- ' ,.• . ,., .4.--- _ _____,, . . ., \ AsP"-;---- ca .r-1.----- --",, cARP°......-, 1 -',., • r"--- •, / ,--- .5--,.... ,.,,...\ • , I , , ( / / \ ' \ \ \ , ; \ \ I •• 1 ) / ..... ,„, ...... ...... .,/,„ 1 , , , c co.: , ---------_ ,__ :,.:Ef:______„,.. .0,0-, _.;.4-ist. ..- •..... ''' .. c- .. • , „el n-----:•-----:----._. _ ''- I Z ,rt •" ,,, : \ I I ' (i I . .......,,, ,.....„ ,...,„.. .. .... . „:„. , I.. , \\ ...„.......---- Z Z. 1 / / I .1 \' \ \ -;%I"1 b 1 / •Slajtb i 1 .<*; lit.** 7.-, ------, t Lk. „.,,, • ,,., \ \ \ \\ \ . • • ) EX•5S----- • %,I .5 0.5 ........."' ..' \ //.7' ,,./ if'''. ar '.'.1 )• 11. Ads; . :„;1111 to 1....1. 7 ,.,..... ,.. . \ CD ••••) k i \ Or" _ ys..7... .'qt.._ 4,0. /-ii..- •J• 1....qk \11#‘,..b001 :If 1=''' \ ••••1.._\N„,,____________---'-'-'7\ . „ -----Ex°"'v----- ..------------ \ Cp -,, ) CI/ /./.,-• ,,--- _____._._..------n \ \\ \--___ ____-•7 ' \ ! \Zt . • s':''''''..7,•14.7,,.„ , Cu' ANG°77 ..., .•#/r ... , -,-. 4.- • iltill7 ) „ , WI C5 kl \ \\ ______) j ). •.*:` / • . , / , : • •; e .--'41.'„`:?,..-,, ,,z. , k . ..- . \N 2., \ _ ,\ _„../ : \ , 4 It . .c.„„. \ \...,,,_.• • ...... .:t 1.... c: \--, ,.....:, -... • Is. i! \ I, \ •S- \ •••••....1/7- 4•%..v., 4 4)'. . TRO iRA/N ....1 t ...,.. / / • • . \ ..----"?( et , / ! \AI\ \ .- --..' --- --,-----__11-___--/ ;\ • ......-- . . . . • • .„.----... w --, 25-.---:..„-.• 0 c5". • ___.-- (1.. ---- 1' * ----- '.; AsPat'it,....;,'''• .- 4-..;,,•• ':'2*'-,.. e.r,z, ...------- PROP03••• -ATER- ,,...-----------____, ' • . . ....,- \ ..\5------1.---- /- - 1\ \ . '. • • - w. I ••,\,,...._______..__---- -"77.7- • kk, ....„..EA•L' '''...' "--' \ ...-------1 •---i..\----- • --------- • ".„------•• T.-a-fill.- ... -•--.....: .. '5 '•-.' ' C3 .........--- \......" * Ei•SS \\ \ \ 1.... .7------ i .--. CI .., 2' 10• _1 io' L.5. 3' . ....---- 11, • Sx''' • Lti-,.---- RETAININp WALL . AS REO D r. \ ..------ .........„,..------ ------- _______0.12. i_Al<6 • ' ' \II N , & GUROL- , 1 1 czi. tii • • AS REQ.0 \ ---- PLAN ---- 2.0% 2.0% 2:‘ , ,r-- -- I: Ce Q•I 8 , ;."'::.•s. "" .-,,,....•, •,-,... ,„ v ...../>".1, ••,. \\ 1 1 L.I_Li ..../.....- col4 0 Eli Lli . II ASPHALT CONCRETE PAVEMENT l'DEEP-- , taci--' II RETAINING WALL AS REQUIRED IN \it - Str.t.__61111111111r g a 6 ...,...2_1_, . -----__I SA-IEET OP ----- bag . ...- EMERGENCY ACCESS ROAD SECTION • ' 2 2 In= 50' 1". 5 PRQ..ecr na_RABER 881,39 . . • �p= DODDS ENGINEERS, INC. JOB NO. C I.V I L ENGINEERING SURVEYING PLANNING DATE - 4205 148TH AVE. N.E., SUITE 200 - BELLEVUE, WA 98007 [208J BB5-7877 OR 454-3743 B Y ee-Z//////V,/OA/ ,/ *). 7/2 &X,41774.07/ 7 ./6/l*?5e, t177P/t ,d 0 6ri G/r(44 L�U = • .. '29Z ," ; • . • . - / �-/A4. /GT GOi 9 • - 4 eeV4.: /25 Ui i-' SGO� i s•-7-- j . /it/. / o,es ..:_ . a4/ezpx ) .. • „„., . . •.1":: SHEET OF �p= DODDS ENGINEERS, INC. JOB NO. CIVIL ENGINEERING SURVEYING PLANNING DATE 4205 148TH AVE. N.E., SUITE 200 - BELLEVUE, WA 98007 1206] 885-7E77 OR 454-3743 BY $/# ?he ji Ui A/O DV/2 /0/ 6 ' lti�' -/,r/Gfi's -gD. () /9a ; d�ye s ,a. 4s &/:- 96 .9'97d e C.�= /o S�NC� �Fl/�G dingy /ao . �38 B0 z/3.5 SHEET OF -/ - ,t t t�0 3$,)30 -. / q 35 55 _ 35 302520 '9 -� - _ - 35, _ 15 L 10 �\ �.45 40 _ s --•___-_ -____=`,. '.. ,_;' , .._,--. c-- - I IIIM 1 kiLk ' .- ---'• naafi 1 . ' ' ( l -- - .TI‘ . ese,,,...ikr . . . _,i.,..:_ .-_. ,,, _____,,.., .--1 7, JERETT ,__,- , ..----- f, . f .... ..::-L„. ..„.._. . • :\ .',, , 15 .2i1 ,i ._ , . ----.-5 7ic.. + . . ___:." :A1)1 a 80 %= 3 25 0 1 025 .2 -_ ' Illi — •= • 4 -7:-- --- 'I----,a>1. 1 ` I r 30 50 45 ---;;:f6 :- '' ' -/.; if/ '' , ) (Nc:' Aaut t71- • „ ._ C — 75 . 1- \:- ! l J 5 c'[i i� \ 45 5 10-:V. I` Jj120 _ 5 4 ..\. 55 35 35 '�� • r ,. as \-- ---- 45\._____. _._.j___--L__ 4035r , CCMA 3 30 • lit ....) 1- 1.._35, 5' 35 S:-.40:15. Cs ' �=RDE N `:.ate � - . -- ' .p'1 30 35 30 `� 3 55 - 35'. 4O - - � 4� 45��.45 30_• CENT•.-L 3' p r cro - — - 35 . . N 50 __ 4�45rr.\____, ZO . ' . C., ��� 5 50 3540 ` 25 * . -30- - .�. � 5 = 30035 C/ 0 4 0 5 i 50 30_ 1\ ; .. l •�o =- r. 33 35 • �s • =' , — Oy 20 3 _ p 5 40 L ADAt�• 35 �30 . , . .:, .. 5055. 505 2 45 !, An_ 2-YEAR 24- 0 7jE 45.5 i . 5 17.5 \ Illilli 1, \ 7.b 17.5API17.5N1 1 1' �� ) ___:-\:: 4. Novirssvi , , ak . I, Nsizi....- ,, rill ' ., • _, Nsi EVE 'ETT ` 3 � i -'02-- k\ ' 5-'5 ' /71: ' '' i. 0 \\( / 41 50 - 1 , ,1, - 45 ,5 '_.3' - ' _ ___-----.1-- ' ---:., ' i , r ;le -_. ' & ' ' 25 _ , 6 .o L '" 40, ii • SE "r� �!�L;, t/ e 1 . s- _ill R • i -'•ti' ),. )•!frol 5 55 � � i ,i -2\y,--:- - } , 45 4 _ 3 40 _� V = 4 TACOMA 30 0 45 40. T ' --)-' 5 - BERrrEF , 40 • - 35 _ 51 /S. 40 1 \ - 30 )__ T - ,;, ... (_. jr � ......___ _,.... ,,_\ ., i ;0 its 51 c. � �.� - _ — ta5/',5` 55 , I ENT' ' LA._ ' _ l; f40 5 6i�_ 31 - ` - 5 35� . s , _-, ,., . - •••1(-- 70- 10- "'" - 1--.:j 5 41 ' �' f \ 35 , 4 .75 s. ( -- �_ - n -42441eno, �.' - 30 610 I ' '+ ,I 3 25z 55 50 50 _ _ - ;5 657a irkms 40 ' ' 45' - c_:- 75 _' , 50 �a \ �� '1 U `v 80 5 � 9( irl • 1' �.-r 5 10 -)-1\7---... ) \17 • 3 .055 0, 31 ' � , 55_ ' 70 .-. 40 1 45 .t . - 25� � 3 ���0 100� Ai ...,..N1 , I � 4C, . .30 - _ , . •- .;,_‘ \�� _RETT - 1 I: .,:,!.'-•\4,1 111, • .-__-- i5f1Ar , — 45 i - ..-_-l'__.:...N.. - 1,0 •.?)) .....,. 4-5-----..- -5,-----•d.i-l5.‘„,_.\ 6:'-‘....,,.',P S _ A .s 80-: :lI9 O(ao- --_-_, -, "4 0 po : .-. 1 - . 1 - -:-<,..., ,.::: "1/11 40 ..-...to; ., - •-7_;:_; '' , ..--....,._:( :_:._,,/, / ,00 s; *wt. I,d. , 1 k oil ;-'w T. 41 liFlir: 1.i1._. 1' :.:_ _' / 2../( _ - ., ,.. ,,,_ ' ,,,: _7" •P ' f, 7 40 s5 �9 f ao - � . 81 - 100 90 ,5 ��85___ --------sl::_____,1 1 � COMA4......\.....< 7. ----__- -_ - ' - 0 . • 6 _ k id _ .. 65 AB` E 5 7i , I 4' i.1.........H 65 , I j ;0. , r__ _1.. '• 10. :,, . 2 „, . �� 5U -,. - 45 5-70 Er\TR ' L �5 - -- ' � ink• so 5 �, .- , 4 70 �, _ _ ' 7 = ss 100_ - 90, ksil " /`� = 5 s+ , �J%, r . 'YS - '� 71. 45 so�,: l0c5� s ,2 - v/�7 V �; 7n 45 - 5 4 0 a., 1,_ 55 . \\\ - ,- -�'S 80 :s` 1 5 . .., 65,E 1 . ". r — k ;�; . - 91 5 ✓80 65 •` 55\ _ J 1 " AD Ni 60 �,' o • -; - ' . 1 I'I T- 1 t I, 80 °� 100-YEA ' '`' = - 0.. .w4 =-. k 115 ./ 6 2 Page of King County Building and Land Development Division TECHNICAL INFORMATION REPORT (TIR) WORKSHEET PART 1` ,•PROJECT OWNER.AND PART 2 PROJECT LOCATION PROJECT ENGINEER AND DESCRIPTION Project Owner Project Name Address Location Phone Township Project Engineer Range Section Company Project Size AC Address Phone Upstream Drainage Basin Size AC PART 3 TYPE OF PERMIT APPLICATION PART 4 OTHER PERMITS Subdivision 0 DOF/G HPA El Shoreline Management Short Subdivision CI COE 404 El Rockery 0 Grading El DOE Dam Safety El Structural Vaults El Commercial El FEMA Floodplain El Other 0 Other El COE Wetlands El HPA =PART 5 SITE COMMUNITY AND DRAINAGE BASIN • Community Drainage Basin PART 6 SITE CHARACTERISTICS El River 0 Floodplain 0 Stream 0 Wetlands 0 Critical Stream Reach 0 Seeps/Springs Depressions/Swales El High Groundwater Table 0 Lake _ El Groundwater Recharge El Steep Slopes El Other Lakeside/Erosion Hazard PART 7 SOILS . Soil Type Slopes Erosion Potential Erosive Velocities - El Additional Sheets Attatched 1/90 Page 2of2 King County Building and Land Development Division TECHNICAL INFORMATION REPORT (TIR) WORKSHEET •ART 8 DEVELOPMENT LIMITATIONS REFERENCE LIMITATION/SITE CONSTRAINT 0 Ch.4-Downstream Analysis El a 0 0 a n Additional Sheets Attatched PART 9 ESC REQUIREMENTS MINIMUM ESC REQUIREMENTS MINIMUM ESC REQUIREMENTS DURING CONSTRUCTION FOLLOWING CONSTRUCTION 0 Sedimentation Facilities 0 Stabilize Exposed Surface 0 Stabilized Construction Entrance CI Remove and Restore Temporary ESC Facilities 0 Perimeter Runoff Control Clean and Remove All Silt and Debris El Clearing and Grading Restrictions CI Ensure Operation of Permanent Facilities 0 Cover Practices 0 Flag Limits of NGPES 0 Construction Sequence 0 Other 0 Other •ART 10 SURFACE WATER SYSTEM - .' ' - 0 Grass Lined Channel 0 Tank 0 Infiltration Method of Analysis Pipe System 0 Vault 0 Depression 0 Open Channel El Energy Dissapator " El Flow Dispersal Compensation/Mitigation 0 Dry Pond El Wetland El Waiver of Eliminated Site Storage CI Wet Pond 0 Stream 0 Regional Detention Brief Description of System Operation Facility Related Site Limitations n Additional Sheets Attatched Reference Facility Limitation PART 11 STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS • PART 12 EASEMENTS/TRACTS • (May require special structural review) El Drainage Easement El Cast in Place Vault El Other 0 Access Easement Retaining Wall 0 Native Growth Protection Easement . El Rockery>4'High El Tract E] Structural on Steep Slope 0 Other •ART 14 SIGNATURE OF PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER'= • • • I or a civil engineer under my supervision have visited the site.Actual site conditions as observed were incorporated into this worksheet and the attatchments. To the best of my knowledge the information provided here is accurate. SIgn•dlka 1/90 e_ CD, ENGINEERS, INC. JOB NO. CIVIL ENGINEERING SURVEYING PLANNING DATE 4205 148TH AVE. N.E., SUITE 200 - BELLEVUE, WA 96007 [2061 BB5-7877 OR 454-3743 B Y ?/PG///,//l//4/4/ ./ o/(/d ,DE/bit/ /�// 2e 477 � /3, 9 a0 Gll,ter, 45' . &eat, e.e_.c/..62 (/ bva L/UES722, E ourizou/• • s�00 • zo/ice .. - r . . / A /D -77H D/i /_i_ IvD,DD 4y sD' gi/ • SHEET OF ap_ DODDS ENGINEERS,P INC. JOB NO. CIVIL ENGINEERING SURVEYINGPLANNING DATE 4205 14BTH AVE. N.E., SUITE 200 - BELLEVUE, WA 98007 [206] 885-7977 OR 454-3743 BY 1&/; FX/57Z Z2v&apt.day pouo a7'2 DIo3-?it/ D )7/e /D)// %90 3167 /v)� 5V8 : 0/t O err 7 /t _/6//W SHEET OF APPENDIX - COMPUTER OUTPUT (The following computer output was generated utilizing the "Waterworks" Hydrologic Program.) •' 1 11/18/92 Dodds Engineers, Incorpoi ed page 1 THE' 1UFFS - PRELIMINARY DETENZJ.SJN ANALYSIS Prepared By: Roy E. Lewis, Jr. , P.E. BASIN SUMMARY BASIN ID: DV1.0 NAME: 10-YEAR DEVELOPED FLOWS - SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA • 7. 98 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0 . 00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE • USER1 PERVIOUS AREA PRECIPITATION • ' 2. 90 inches AREA. . : 3. 97 Acres TIME INTERVAL • 10 . 00 min CN • 82 . 00 TIME OF CONC • 13. 00 min IMPERVIOUS AREA ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0.20 AREA. . : 4 . 01 Acres CN • 98 . 00 PEAK RATE: 3. 67 cfs VOL: 1.32 Ac-ft TIME: 480 min BASIN ID: DV100 NAME: 100-YEAR DEVELOPED FLOWS SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA. . ,. . . . . : 7. 98 Acres BASEFLOWS : 0 . 00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE • USER1 PERVIOUS AREA PRECIPITATION • 3. 90 inches AREA. . : 3. 97 Acres TIME INTERVAL • 10 . 00 min CN • 82 . 00 TIME OF CONC. . . . . : 13. 00 min IMPERVIOUS AREA ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0 .20 AREA. . : 4 . 01 Acres CN. . . . : 98 . 00 PEAK RATE: 5.43 cfs VOL: 1 . 93 Ac-ft TIME: 480 min BASIN ID: DV2 NAME: 2-YEAR DEVELOPED FLOWS SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA • 7 . 98 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0. 00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE • USER1 PERVIOUS AREA PRECIPITATION • 1 . 90 inches AREA. . : 3. 97 Acres TIME INTERVAL • 10 . 00 min CN • 82 . 00 TIME OF CONC • 13. 00 min IMPERVIOUS AREA ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0.20 AREA. . : 4 . 01 Acres CN • 98 . 00 PEAK RATE: 2. 03 cfs VOL: 0.75 Ac-ft TIME: 480 min 11/18/92 `;Dodds Engineers, Incorpord page 2 THE BLUFFS - PRELIMINARY DETENTION ANALYSIS Prepared By: Roy E. Lewis, Jr. , P.E. BASIN SUMMARY BASIN ID: EX10 NAME: 10-YEAR EXISTING FLOWS SBUH METHODOLOGY • TOTAL AREA • 7 . 98 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0 . 00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE • USER1 PERVIOUS AREA PRECIPITATION • 2 . 90 inches AREA. . : 7 . 98 Acres TIME INTERVAL • 10 . 00 min CN • 82 .00 TIME OF CONC • 20 .32 min IMPERVIOUS AREA ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0 .20 AREA. . : 0 . 00 Acres CN • 98. 00 TcReach - Sheet L.: 225. 00 ns: 0 .4000 p2yr: 1 . 90 s:0.2800 TcReach - Shallow L: 225. 00 ks:4 . 00 s: 0 .2800 PEAK RATE: 1 . 90 cfs VOL: 0 . 86 Ac-ft TIME: 480 min BASIN ID: EX100 NAME: 100-YEAR EXISTING FLOWS SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA • 7 . 98 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0. 00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE • USER1 PERVIOUS AREA PRECIPITATION • 3. 90 inches AREA. . : 7 . 98 Acres TIME INTERVAL • 10 . 00 min CN • 82 . 00 TIME OF CONC • 20.32 min IMPERVIOUS AREA ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0.20 AREA. . : 0 . 00 Acres CN • 98 . 00 TcReach - Sheet L: 225'. 00 ns: 0 .4000 p2yr: 1 . 90 s: 0 .2800 TcReach - Shallow L: 225. 00 ks:4 . 00 s: 0 .2800 PEAK RATE: 3.38 cfs VOL: 1.41 Ac-ft TIME: 480 min BASIN ID: EX2 NAME: 2-YEAR EXISTING FLOWS SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA • 7 . 98 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0 . 00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE • USER1 PERVIOUS AREA PRECIPITATION • 1 . 90 inches AREA. . : 7 . 98 Acres TIME INTERVAL • 10 . 00 min CN • 82 . 00 TIME OF CONC • 20 .32 min IMPERVIOUS AREA ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0 .20 AREA. . : 0 . 00 Acres • CN • 98 . 00 • TcReach - Sheet L: 225. 00 ns: 0 .4000 p2yr: 1. 90 s: 0 .2800 TcReach - Shallow L: 225.00 ks:4 . 00 s: 0.2800 PEAK RATE: 0 . 65 cfs VOL: 0 .39 Ac-ft TIME: 480 min 11/18/92 Dodds Engineers, Incorporc—.<;d page 3 THE BLUFFS - PRELIMINARY DETENTION ANALYSIS Prepared By: Roy E. Lewis, Jr. , P.E. HYDROGRAPH SUMMARY PEAK TIME VOLUME HYD RUNOFF OF OF Contrib NUM RATE PEAK HYDRO Area cfs min. cf-AcFt Acres 1 0 . 646 480 ( 16911 cf 7 . 98 2 1. 899 480 37679 cf 7 . 98 3 3 .379 480 61346 cf 7 . 98 4 2 . 027 480 32799 cf 7 . 98 5 3 . 673 480 57591 cf 7 . 98 6 5 .434 480 83873 cf 7 . 98 7 0 .295 1450 17599 cf 7 . 98 8 0 .701 790 42391 cf 7 . 98 9 1 .380 650 68672 cf 7 . 98 11/18/92 ' Dodds Engineers, Incorpord page 4 THE BLUFFS - PRELIMINARY DETENTION ANALYSIS Prepared By: Roy E. Lewis, Jr. , P.E. STORAGE STRUCTURE LIST STORAGE LIST ID No. 1 Description: DETENTION POND 11/18/92 Dodds Engineers, Incorporated page 5 THE BLUFFS - PRELIMINARY DETENTION ANALYSIS Prepared By: Roy E. Lewis, Jr. , P .E. STAGE STORAGE TABLE CUSTOM STORAGE ID No. 1 Description: DETENTION POND • STAGE <----STORAGE----> STAGE <----STORAGE----> STAGE <----STORAGE----> STAGE <----STORAGE----> (ft) ---cf--- --Ac-Ft- (ft) ---cf--- --Ac-Ft- (ft) ---cf--- --Ac-Ft- (ft) ---cf--- --Ac-Ft- 55.00 0.0000 0.0000 57.20 8360 0.1919 59.40 17680 0.4059 61.60 31320 0.7190 55.10 380.00 0.0087 57.30 8740 0.2006 59.50 18300 0.4201 61.70 31940 0.7332 55.20 760.00 0.0174 57.40 9120 0.2094 59.60 18920 0.4343 61.80 32560 0.7475 55.30 1140 0.0262 57.50 9500 0.2181 59.70 19540 0.4486 61.90 33180 0.7617 55.40 1520 0.0349 57.60 9880 0.2268 59.80 20160 0.4628 62.00 33800 0.7759 55.50 1900 0.0436 57.70 10260 0.2355 59.90 20780 0.4770 62.10 34687 0.7963 55.60 2280 0.0523 57.80 10640 0.2443 60.00 21400 0.4913 62.20 35573 0.8167 55.70 2660 0.0611 57.90 11020 0.2530 60.10 22020 0.5055 62.30 36460 0.8370 55.80 3040 0.0698 58.00 11400 0.2617 60.20 22640 0.5197 62.40 37347 0.8574 55.90 3420 0.0785 58.10 11780 0.2704 60.30 23260 0.5340 62.50 38233 0.8777 56.00 3800 0.0872 58.20 12160 0.2792 60.40 23880 0.5482 62.60 39120 0.8981 56.10 4180 0.0960 58.30 12540 0.2879 60.50 24500 0.5624 62.70 40007 0.9184 56.20 4560 0.1047 58.40 12920 0.2966 60.60 25120 0.5767 62.80 40893 0.9388 56.30 4940 0.1134 58.50 13300 0.3053 60.70 25740 0.5909 62.90 41780 0.9591 56.40 5320 0.1221 58.60 13680 0.3140 60.80 26360 0.6051 63.00 42667 0.9795 56.50 5700 0.1309 58.70 14060 0.3228 60.90 26980 0.6194 63.10 43553 0.9998 56.60 6080 0.1396 58.80 14440 0.3315 61.00 27600 0.6336 63.20 44440 1.0202 56.70 6460 0.1483 58.90 14820 0.3402 61.10 28220 0.6478 63.30 45327 1.0406 56.80 6840 0.1570 59.00 15200 0.3489 61.20 28840 0.6621 63.40 46213 1.0609 56.90 7220 0.1657 59.10 15820 0.3632 61.30 29460 0.6763 63.50 47100 1.0813 57.00 7600 0.1745 59.20 16440 0.3774 61.40 30080 0.6905 63.50 47100 1.0813 57.10 7980 0.1832 59.30 17060 0.3916 61.50 30700 0.7048 1 11/18/92 Dodds Engineers, Incorporated page 6 THE BLUFFS - PRELIMINARY DETENTION ANALYSIS Prepared By: Roy E. Lewis, Jr. , P.E. DISCHARGE STRUCTURE LIST MULTIPLE ORIFICE ID No. 1 Description: MULTIPLE ORIFICE STANDPIPE Outlet Elev: 59. 00 Elev: 59. 00 ft Orifice Diameter: 3. 0000 in. Elev: 60.00 ft Orifice 2 Diameter: 4 .0000 in. Elev: 61 . 00 ft Orifice 3 Diameter: 5. 0000 in. RISER DISCHARGE ID No. 2 Description: OVERFLOW STANDPIPE Riser Diameter (in) : 24 . 00 elev: 62 . 00 ft Weir Coefficient. . . : 3. 782 height : 63.50 ft Orif Coefficient. . . : 9.739 increm: 0 . 10 ft COMBINATION DISCHARGE ID No. 3 Description: ORIFICE + OVERFLOW STANDPIPE Structure: 1 Structure: Structure: 2 Structure: • Structure: 11/18/92 Dodds Engineers, Incorporated page 7 THE BLUFFS - PRELIMINARY DETENTION ANALYSIS Prepared By: Roy E. Lewis, Jr. , P .E. STAGE DISCHARGE TABLE MULTIPLE ORIFICE ID No. 1 Description: MULTIPLE ORIFICE STANDPIPE Outlet Elev: 59. 00 Elev: 59. 00 ft Orifice Diameter: 3. 0000 in. Elev: 60 .00 ft Orifice 2 Diameter: 4 . 0000 in. Elev: 61. 00 ft Orifice 3 Diameter: 5 .0000 in. - STAGE <--DISCHARGE---> STAGE <--DISCHARGE---> STAGE <--DISCHARGE---> STAGE <--DISCHARGE---> (ft) ---cfs (ft) ---cfs (ft) ---cfs (ft) ---cfs 59.00 0.0000 60.20 0.4617 61.40 1.3212 62.60 2.0217 59.10 0.0772 60.30 0.5163 61.50 1.3977 62.70 2.0678 59.20 0.1092 60.40 0.5636 61.60 1.4685 62.80 2.1128 59.30 0.1338 60.50 0.6061 61.70 1.5350 62.90 2.1569 59.40 0.1545 60.60 0.6453 61.80 1.5980 63.00 2.1999 59.50 0.1727 60.70 0.6817 61.90 1.6580 63.10 2.2421 59.60 0.1892 60.80 0.7160 62.00 1.7155 63.20 2.2835 59.70 0.2043 60.90 0.7486 62.10 1.7708 63.30 2.3241 59.80 0.2184 61.00 0.7796 62.20 1.8241 63.40 2.3639 59.90 0.2317 61.10 1.0238 62.30 1.8757 63.50 2.4031 60.00 0.2442 61.20 1.1413 62.40 1.9257 60.10 0.3935 61.30 1.2370 62.50 1.9743 11/18/92 Dodds Engineers, Incorporated page 8 THE BLUFFS - PRELIMINARY DETENTION ANALYSIS Prepared By: Roy E. Lewis, Jr. , P.E. STAGE DISCHARGE TABLE RISER DISCHARGE ID No. 2 Description: OVERFLOW STANDPIPE Riser Diameter (in) : 24 . 00 elev: 62 . 00 ft Weir Coefficient. . . : 3.782 height: 63.50 ft Orif Coefficient. . . : 9.739 increm: 0 . 10 ft STAGE <--DISCHARGE---> STAGE <--DISCHARGE---> STAGE <--DISCHARGE---> STAGE <--DISCHARGE---> (ft) ---cfs (ft). ---cfs (ft) ---cfs (ft) ---cfs 62.00 0.0000 62.40 4.9276 62.90 14.352 63.40 17.900 62.00 0.0000 62.50 6.8865 63.00 15.128 63.50 18.528 62.10 0.6159 62.60 9.0526 63.10 15.866 63.50 18.528 62.20 1.7422 62.70 11.408 63.20 16.572 62.30 3.2006 62.80 13.937 63.30 17.249 11/18/92 Dodds Engineers, Incorporated page 9 THE BLUFFS - PRELIMINARY DETENTION ANALYSIS Prepared By: , Roy E. Lewis, Jr. , P.E. STAGE DISCHARGE TABLE COMBINATION DISCHARGE ID No. 3 Description: ORIFICE + OVERFLOW STANDPIPE Structure: 1 Structure: Structure: . 2 Structure: Structure: STAGE <--DISCHARGE---> STAGE <--DISCHARGE---> STAGE <--DISCHARGE---> STAGE <--DISCHARGE---> (ft) ---cfs (ft) ---cfs (ft) ---cfs (ft) ---cfs 59.00 0.0000 60.20 0.4617 61.40 1.3212 62.60 11.074 59.10 0.0772 60.30 0.5163 61.50 1.3977 62.70 13.475 59.20 0.1092 60.40 0.5636 61.60 1.4685 62.80 16.050 59.30 0.1338 60.50 0.6061 61.70 1.5350 62.90 16.509 59.40 0.1545 60.60 0.6453 61.80 1.5980 63.00 17.328 59.50 0.1727 60.70 0.6817 61.90 1.6580 63.10 18.109 59.60 0.1892 60.80 0.7160 62.00 1.7155 63.20 18.855 59.70 0.2043 60.90 0.7486 62.10 2.3867 63.30 19.573 59.80 0.2184 61.00 0.7796 62.20 3.56b 63.40 20.264 59.90 0.2317 61.10 1.0238 62.30 5.0762 63.50 20.931 60.00 0.2442 61.20 1.1413 62.40 6.8533 60.10 0.3935 61.30 1.2370 62.50 8.8608 11/18/92 Dodds Engineers, Incorporated page 10 THE BLUFFS - PRELIMINARY DETENTION ANALYSIS Prepared By: Roy E. Lewis, Jr. , P.E. ROUTING REPORT STORAGE LIST ID No. 1 Description: DETENTION POND COMBINATION'DISCHARGE ID No. 3 Description: ORIFICE + OVERFLOW STANDPIPE Structure: 1 Structure: Structure: 2 Structure: Structure: ROUTING CURVE STAGE STORAGE OUTFLOW 0+2S STAGE STORAGE OUTFLOW .0+2S STAGE STORAGE OUTFLOW 0+2S (ft) (cf) (cfs) cfs-min (ft) (cf) (cfs) cfs-min (ft) (cf) (cfs) cfs-min 55.00 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 57.90 11020 0.0000 36.733 60.80 26360 0.7160 88.583 55.10 380.00 0.0000 1.2667 58.00 11400 0.0000 38.000 60.90 26980 0.7486 90.682 55.20 760.00 0.0000 2.5333 58.10 11780 0.0000 39.267 61.00 27600 0.7796 92.780 )55.30 1140 0.0000 3.8000 58.20 12160 0.0000 40.533 61.10 28220 1.0238 95.091 55.40 1520 0.0000 5.0667 58.30 12540 0.0000 41.800 61.20 28840 1.1413 97.275 55.50 1900 0.0000 6.3333 58.40 12920 0.0000 43.067 61.30 29460 1.2370 99.437 55.60 2280 0.0000 7.6000 58.50 13300 0.0000 44.333 61.40 30080 1.3212 101.59 55.70 2660 0.0000 8.8667 58.60 13680 0.0000 45.600 61.50 30700 1.3977 103.73 55.80 3040 0.0000 10.133 58.70 14060 0.0000 46.867 61.60 31320 1.4685 105.87 55.90 3420 0.0000 11.400 58.80 14440 0.0000 48.133 61.70 31940 1.5350 108.00 56.00 3800 0.0000 12.667 58.90 14820 0.0000 49.400 61.80 32560 '.5980 110.13 56.10 4180 0.0000 13.933 59.00 15200 0.0000 50.667 61.90 3318:. .6580 112.26 56.20 4560 0.0000 15.200 59.10 15820 0.0772 52.811 62.00 33800 1.7155 114.38 56.30 4940 0.0000 16.467 59.20 16440 0.1092 54.909 62.10 3468.7 2.3867 118.01 56.40 5320 0.0000 17.733 59.30 17060 0.1338 57.000 62.20 35573 3.5663 122.14 56.50 5700 0.0000 19.000 59.40 17680 0.1545 59.088 62.30 36460 5.0762 126.61 56.60 6080 0.0000 20.267 59.50 18300 0.1727 61.173 62.40 37347 6.8533 131.34 56.70 6460 0.0000 21.533 59.60 18920 0.1892 63.256 62.50 38233 8.8608 136.31 56.80 6840 0.0000 22.800 59.70 19540 0.2043 65.338 62.60 39120 11.074 141.47 56.90 7220 0.0000 24.067 59.80 20160 0.2184 67.418 62.70 40007 13.475 146.83 57.00 7600 0.0000 25.333 59.90 20780 0.2317 69.498 62.80 40893 16.050 152.36 57.10 7980 0.0000 26.600 60.00 21400 0.2442 71.578 62.90 41780 16.509 155.78 57.20 8360 0.0000 27.867 60.10 22020 0.3935 73.793 63.00 42667 17.328 159.55 57.30 8740 0.0000 29.133 60.20 22640 0.4617 75.928 63.10 43553 18.109 163.29 57.40 9120 0.0000 30.400 60.30 23260 0.5163 78.050 '63.20 44440 18.855' 166.99 57.50 9500 0.0000 31.667 60.40 23880 0.5636 80.164 63.30 45327 19.573 170.66 57.60 9880 0.0000 32.933 60.50 24500 0.6061 82.273 63.40 46213 20.264 174.31 57.70 10260 0.0000 34.200 60.60 25120 0.6453 84.379 57.80 10640) 0.0000 35.467 60.70 25740 0.6817 86.482 11/18/92 Dodds Engineers, Incorporated page 11 THE BLUFFS - PRELIMINARY DETENTION ANALYSIS Prepared By: Roy E. Lewis, Jr. , P.E. LEVEL POOL ROUTING TABLE 2-YEAR ROUTING MATCH Q (cfs) 0. 65 INFLOW Q (cfs) : 2 . 03 PEAK STAGE (ft) : 60 . 03 PEAK OUTFLOW 0 .30 PEAK TIME: 1450. 00 min. INFLOW HYD No. : 4 OUTFLOW HYD No. : 7 LEVEL POOL ROUTING TABLE I1 I2 2S1 SUM 01 02+252 STAGE TIME < cfs min > (ft) (min) 0 . 0000 0 . 0007 0 .0000 0 . 0007 0 . 0000 0 . 0007 55 . 00 60 . 00 0 . 0007 0. 0051 0. 0007 0. 0066 0 . 0000 0 .0066 55. 00 70 . 00 0 . 0051 0 . 0135 0 .0066 0 . 0252 0 . 0000 0 . 0252 55. 00 80 . 00 0 . 0135 0 .0234 0 .0252 0 . 0621 0. 0000 0 .0621 55 . 00 ' 90 . 00 0 . 0234 0 .0332 0 .0621 0. 1188 0 . 0000 0 . 1188 55. 00 100 . 00 0 . 0332 0 . 0467 0 .1188 0 .1987 0 . 0000 .0 . 1987 55. 01 110 . 00" 0 . 0467 0.0625 0 .1987 0 .3080 0 . 0000 0 .3080 55. 02 120 . 00 0 . 0625 0 . 0758 0 .3080 ' 0 .4462 0 . 0000 0 . 4462 55. 02 130 . 00 0 . 0758 0 . 0872 0 .4462 0 . 6093 0. 0000 0 . 6093 55. 04 140 . 00 0 . 0872 0 . 0974 0 . 6093 0 .7939 0 . 0000 0 . 7939 55 . 05 150 . 00 0 . 0974 0 . 1064 0 .7939 0 . 9976 0. 0000 0 . 9976 55 . 06 160 . 00 0 . 1064 0 .1216 0 . 9976 ' 1 .2257 0. 0.000 1 .2257 55.08 170 . 00 0 . 1216 0 .1.400 1 .2257 1 .4873 0 . 0000 '1 .4873 55. 10 180 . 00 0 . 1400 0 .1529 1 .4873 1 .7803 0 . 0000 1 .7803 55 . 12 190 . 00 0 . 1529 0 . 1630 1.7803 2 . 0962 0 . 0000 2 . 0962 55 . 14 200. 00 0 . 1630 0 .1713 2 .0962 2 .4304 0 . 0000 2 .4304 55. 17 210 . 00 0 . 1713 0 .1784 2.4304 2 .7800 0 . 0000 2 .7800 55 . 19 220 . 00 0 . 1784 0 . 1938 2 .7800 3.1523 0 . 0000 3. 1523 55.22 230 . 00 0 . 1938 0 .2131 3. 1523 3.5592 0 . 0000 3.5592 55 .25 240 . 00 0 .2131 0 .2251 . 3 .5592 3. 9974 0.0000 3 . 9974 55 .28 250 . 00 0 .2251 0 .2337 3. 9974 4 .4562 0 . 000.0 4 .4562 55 .32 260 . 00 0 .2337 0 .2403 4 .4562 4 . 9302 0 . 0000 4 . 9302 55 .35 270 . 00 0 .2403 0 .2459 4 . 9302 5.4163 0 .0000 5 .4163 55.39 280. 00 0 .2459 0 .2630 5.4163 5. 9252 0. 0000 5 . 9252 55.43 290. 00 0 .2630 0 .2855 5. 9252 6.4738 . 0 . 0000 6. 4738 55. 47 300 . 00 ' 0 .2855 0 .2982 6.4738 7 . 0575 0 . 0000 7 . 0575 55.51 310 . 00 0 .2982 0.3062 7 . 0575 7 . 6619 0 . 0000 7 . 6619 55.56 320 . 00 0 .3062 0.3120 7 . 6619 8 .2801 0 . 0000 8 .2801 55. 60 330 . 00 0 .3120 0 .3166 8 .2801 8 . 9087 0 . 0000 8 . 9087 55 . 65 340 .00 0 .3166 0 .3348 8. 9087 9.5601 0 . 0000 9.5601 55 .70 350 . 00 0 .3348 0 .3593 9.5601 ' '10 .254 0 . 0000 10 .254 55.75 360 . 00 0 .3593 0.3722 10 .254 10 . 9.86 0 . 0000 10 . 986 55 . 81 370 . 00 0 .3722 0 .3799 10 . 986 11 .738 0 . 0000 11 .738 55 . 87 380. 00 0 .3799 0 .3869 11.738 12 .505 0 . 0000 12 .505 55 . 93 390 . 00 0 .3869 0 .3951 12.505 13.287 0. 0000 13 .287 . 55. 99 400 .00 0 .3951 0 .4521 13.287 14 . 134 0 . 0000 14 . 134 56. 05 410 . 00 0 . 4521 0 .5328 14 .13.4 15. 119 0 . 0000 15. 119 56. 12 420 . 00 0 .5328 0.5780 15. 119 16.230 0 . 0000 16.230 56. 19 430 . 00 0 .5780 0 . 6688 16.230 17 .476 0. 0000 17 .476 56.28 440 . 00 0 . 6688 0 .7826 17.476 18 . 928 0 . 0000 18 . 928 56.38 450 . 00 0 .7826 1. 0778 18 . 928 20.788 0 . 0000 20 .788 56.49 460 . 00 11/18/92 Dodds Engineers, Incorpc: ted page 12 THE aLUFFS - PRELIMINARY DETENti-ION ANALYSIS Prepared By: Roy E. Lewis, Jr. , P.E. LEVEL POOL ROUTING TABLE LEVEL POOL ROUTING TABLE I1 I2 2S1 SUM 01 02+2S2 STAGE TIME cfs min > (ft) (min) 1 . 0778 1 .7755 20.788 23. 642 0 . 0000 23 . 642 56. 64 470 . 00 1 .7755 2. 0265 23. 642 27 .444 0 . 0000 27 . 444 56. 87 480 . 00 2 . 0265 1 . 6147 27 .444 31.085 0 . 0000 31 . 085 57 . 17 490 . 00 1 . 6147 1 .2254 31 . 085 33 . 925 0 . 0000 33 . 925 57 .45 500 . 00 1 .2254 0 . 9840 33. 925 36. 134 0 . 0000 36. 134 57 . 68 '510 . 00 0 . 9840 0 . 8816 36.134 38 . 000 0 . 0000 38 . 000 57 . 85 520 . 00 0 . 8816 0 .7631 38 . 000 39. 644 0 . 0000 39. 644 58 . 00 530 . 00 0 . 7631 0 . 6361 39. 644 41. 044 0 . 0000 41 . 044 58 . 13 540 . 00 0 . 6361 0 .5816 41. 044 42.261 0 . 0000 42 .261 58 .24 550 . 00 0 .5816 0 .5593 42.261 43 .402 0 . -'000 43. 402 58 .34 560 . 00 0 .5593 0 .5512 43.402 44.513 0 . 0000 44 .513 58 .43 570 . 00 0 .5512 0 .5495 44 .513 45. 613 0 . 0000 45. 613 58 .51 , 580 . 00 0 .5495 0 .5505 45. 613 46.713 0 . 0000 46. 713 58 . 60 590 . 00 0 .5505 0 .5528 46.713 47 . 817 0 . 0000 47 . 817 58 . 69 600 .00 0 .5528 0 .5555 47 . 817 48 . 925 0 . 0000 48 . 925 58 .78 610 . 00 0 .5555 0 .5584 48 . 925 50 . 039 0 .0000 50 . 039 58 . 86 620 . 00 0 .5584 0 .5614 50 . 039 51.159 0.0000 51 . 159 58 . 95 630 . 00 0 .5614 0 .5643 51. 141 52.267 0.0177 52 .249 59. 02 640 . 00 0 .5643 0 .5383 52.192 53.295 0.0570 53 .238 59. 07 650 . 00 0 .5383 0 .4992 53. 154 54.191 0 .0837 54 . 108 59. 12 660 . 00 0 . 4992 0 .4829 54. 011 54. 993 0 .0970 54 . 896 59.16 670 . 00 0 . 4829 0 .4766 54.787 55.746 0 .1090 55. 637 59.20 680 . 00 0 .4766 0 .4749 55.519 56.471 0 .1178 56.353 59.23 690 . 00 0 . 4749 0 .4751 56.227 57.177 0 . 1262 57 . 051 59.27 700 . 00 0 .4751 0.4761 56. 916 57 . 868 0 . 1343 57 .733 59.30 710 . 00 0 .4761 0 .4776 57 .592 58 .546 0 . 1410 58 .405 59.34 720 . 00 0 . 4776 0 .4792 58 .257 59.214 0 . 1477 59. 066 59.37 730 . 00 0 .4792 0 .4808 58 . 912 59. 872 0 . 1543 59. 718 59.40 740 . 00 0 .4808 0 .4825 59.558 60 .521 0 . 1600 60 .361 59.43 750 . 00 0 .4825 0 .4841 60 .196 61 . 162 0 . 1656 60 . 997 59. 46 760 . 00 0 .4841 0 .4575 60. 825 61 .767 0 . 1712 61 .596 59.49 770 . 00 0 .4575 0 .4181 61 .420 62 .295 0 . 1760 . 62 . 119 59.52 780 . 00 0 .4181 0 .4011 61 . 939 62 .758 0 . 1802 62 .578 59.55 790 . 00 0 .4011 0 .3941 62.394 63. 190 0 . 1838 63. 006 59.57 800 . 00 0 .3941 0 .3916 62. 819 463. 604 ' 0 . 1872 63 . 417 59.59 810 . 00 0 .3916 0.3909 63.227 64 . 009 0 . 1904 63 . 819 59. 61 820 . 00 0 .3909 0.3912 63. 626 64.408 0 .1933 64 .214 59. 63 830 . 00 0 .3912 0 .3918 64.018 .64 . 801 0 .1962 64 . 605 59. 65 840 . 00 0 .3918 0 .3926 64 .406 65. 191 0 . 1990 64 . 992 59. 66 850 . 00 0 . 3926 0 .3935 64 .790 65.576 0 .2018 65.374 59. 68 860 . 00 0 . 3935 0 .3944 65-.169 65. 957 P0 .2046 65.753 59. 70 870 . 00 0 .3944 0 .3953 65.546 66.335 0 .2072 66. 128 59.72 880 .0.0 0 .3953 0.3826 65. 918 66. 696 0 .2097 66. 486 59.74 890 . 00 0 .3826 0.3638 66.274 67 .021 0 .2121 66. 809 59.76 900 . 00 0 .3638 0 .3558 66.594 67 .314 0 .2143 67 . 100 59.77 910 . 00 0 . 3558 0 .3527 66. 883 67 .592 0 .2163 67 . 376 59.78 920 . 00 0 .3527 0 .3516 67. 157 67 . 862 0 .2182 67 . 643 59. 80 930 . 00 11/18/92 Dodds Engineers, Incorpc ted page 13 THm BLUFFS - PRELIMINARY DETENriON ANALYSIS Prepared By: Roy E. Lewis, Jr. , P.E. LEVEL POOL ROUTING TABLE LEVEL POOL ROUTING TABLE I1 I2 2S1 SUM 01 02+252 STAGE TIME < cfs min > (ft) (min) 0 .3516 0 .3515 67 .424 68 . 127 0 .2199 67 . 907 59. 81 940 . 00 0 . 3515 0 .3518 67 . 685 68.389 0 .2216 68 . 167 59. 82 950 . 00 0 .3518 0 .3523 67 . 944 68. 648 0 .2232 68 . 425 59. 84 960 . 00 0 .3523 0 .3529 68 .200 68. 905 0 .2249 68 . 680 59 . 85 970 .00 0 . 3529 0 . 3535 68 .454 69. 160 0 .2265 68 . 933 59. 86 980 . 00 0 .3535 0 .3541 68 .705 69.413 0 .2281 69. 185 59 . 87 990 . 00 0 .3541 0 .3547 68 . 955 69. 664 0 .2297 69. 434 59. 88 1000 . 00 0 .3547 0 .3355 69.203 69. 893 0 .2313 69. 662 59. 90 1010 . 00 0 .3355 0 .3075 69.429 70. 072 0 .2327 69. 839 59. 91 1020 . 00 0 .3075 0 .2952 69. 606 70.208 0 .2338 69. 975 59. 92 1030 . 00 0 .2952 0 .2900 69.740 70.325 0 .2346 70 . 091 59. 92 1040 .00 0 .2900 0 .2879 69. 855 70.433 0 .2353 70 . 198 59. 93 1050 . 00 0 .2879 0 .2871 69. 962 70.537 0.2359 70 . 301 59. 93 1060 . 00 0 .2871 0 .2870 70 . 064 70. 63.9 0 .2365 70 . 402 59. 94 1070 . 00 0 .2870 0 .2872 70 . 165 70 .739 0 .2371 70 .502 59. 94 1080 . 00 0 .2872 0 .2874 70 .264 70. 839 0 .2377 70 . 601 59. 95 1090 . 00 0 .2874 0 .2877 70 .363 70. 938 0 .2383 70 . 699 59. 95 1100 . 00 0 .2877 0 .2881 70 .461 71. 036 0 .2389 70 .797 59. 96 1110 . 00 0 .2881 0 .2884 70 .558 71. 134 0 .2395 70 . 895 59. 96 1120 . 00 0 .2884 0 .2888 70 . 655 71.232 0 .2401 70 . 992 59. 97 1130. 00 0 .2888 0 .2892 70 .751 71.329 0 .2407 71 . 08.9 59. 97 1140.00 0 .2892 0 .2895 70 . 847 71 .426 0 .2413 71 . 185 59. 98 1150 . 00 0 .2895 0 .2899 70. 943 71.522 0 .2419 71.280 59. 98 1160 . 00 0 .2899 0.2902 71 . 038 71. 618 0 .2424 71 . 375 59. 99 1170 .00 0 .2902 0 .2906 71 . 132 71.713 0 .2430 71 . 470 59 . 99 k1180 .00 0 .2906 0 .2909 71 .227 71. 808 0 .2436 71 .564 59 . 99 1190 . 00 0 .2909 0 .2912 71 .320 71. 902 0 .2442 71 . 658 60 . 00 1200. 00 0 .2912 0 .2916 71 .409 71. 991 0 .2497 71 . 742 60 . 00 1210 . 00 0 .2916 0 .2919 71 .486 72. 070 0 .2553 71 . 815 60 . 01 1220 . 00 0 .2919 0 .2923 71 .555 72. 139 0 .2602 71 . 878 60 . 01 1230 . 00 0 .2923 0.2926 71 . 614 72. 199 0 .2645 71 . 934 60 . 01 1240 . 00 0 .2926 0 .2929 71 . 666 72.252 0 .2683 71 . 983 60 . 02 1250 . 00 0 .2929 0 .2932 71 .712 72.298 0 .2716 72 . 026 60 . 02 1260 . 00 0 .2932 0 .2936 71 .752 72.339 0 .2745 72 . 064 60 . 02 1270 . 00 0 .2936 0 .2939 71 .787 72.375 0 .2770 72. 098 60 . 02 1280 .00 0 .2939 0 .2942 71. 818 72. 407 0 .2793 72 . 127 60 . 02 1290 . 00 0 .2942 0 .2945 71 . 846. 72.435 0 .2813 72 . 154 60 . 02 1300 . 00 0 .2945 0 .2949 71 . 871 72.460 0 .2830 72 .177 60 . 03 1310 . 00 0 .2949 0 .2952 71. 892 72. 482 0 .2846 72 . 198 60 . 03 1320 . 00 0 .2952 0 .2955 71 . 912 72.502 0 .2860 72 .216 60 . 03 1330 . 00 0 .2955 0 .2958 71 . 929 72.520 0 .2873 72 .233 60 . 03 1340 . 00 0 .2958 0 .2961 71 . 945 72.537 0,2884 72 .248 60 . 03 1350 . 00 0 .2961 0 .2964 71 . 959 72.551 0 .2894 72 .262 60 . 03 1360 . 00 0 .2964 0 .2967 71 . 972 72.565 0 .2903 72 .274 60 . 03 1370 . 00 0 .2967 0 .2970 71 . 983 72.577 0 .2912 72 .286 60 . 03 1380 . 00 0 .2970 0 .2973 71 . 994 72.588 0 .2919 72 .296 60 . 03 1390 . 00 0 .2973 0.2976 72 . 004 72.599 0 .2926 72 . 306 60 . 03 1400 .00 11/18/92 Dodds Engineers, Incorp( ted page 14 TILL-3LUFFS - PRELIMINARY DETE1v"ijON ANALYSIS Prepared By: Roy E. Lewis, Jr. , P .E. LEVEL POOL ROUTING TABLE LEVEL POOL ROUTING TABLE I1 I2 2S1 SUM 01 02+2S2 STAGE TIME < cfs min . > (ft) (min)' 0 .2976 0 .2979, 72. 013 72 . 608 0.2933 72 . 315 60 . 03 1410 . 00 0 .2979 0 .2982 72. 021 72 . 617 0 .2939 72 .323 60 . 03 1420. 00 0 .2982 0 .2985 . 72. 029 72. 626 0 .2945 72 .331 60 . 03 1430 . 00 0 .2985 0 .2988 72 . 036 72 . 633 0.2950 72 .338 60 . 03 1440 . 00 0 .2988 0 .2159 72. 043 72 .558 0 .2955 72 .262 60 . 03 1450 . 00 0 .2159 0 . 0960 71 . 972 72 .284 0 .2903 71 . 993 60 . 03 1460 . 00 0 . 0960 0 . 0426 71.721 71 . 860 0.2722 71 .587 60 . 02 1470 . 00 0 . 0426 0 . 0190 71.343 71 .404 0 .2449 71 . 159 60 . 00 1480 . 00 0 . 0190 0 . 0084 70 . 918 70 . 945 0.2417 70.703 ' 59. 98 1490 . 00 0 . 0084 0 . 0037 .70.464 70 .476 0 .2390 70 .237 59. 96 1500 . 00 0 . 0037 0,.0017 70 . 001 70 . 007 0 .2362 69.771 59. 94 1510 . 00 0 . 0017 0 .0007 69.537 69.540 0.2333 69.306 59. 91 1520 . 00 0 . 0007 ' 0 .0003 69. 076 69.077 0 .2305 68 . 846 59. 89 1530 . 00 0 . 0003 0 . 0001 ' 68 . 619 68 . 619 0 .2275 .68 .392 59. 87 1540 . 00 0 . 0001 0 . 0001 68 .167 68 . 167 0.2246 67 . 943 59. 85 1550 . 00 0 . 0001 0 . 0000 67 .721 67 .721 0 .2218 , 67 .499 59. 83 1560 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 67.280 67 .280 0 .2190 67 . 061 59. 80 1570 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 66. 845 66. 845 - 0 .2160 66. 629 59.78' 1580 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 66.416 66.416 0 .2131 66.203 59.76 1590 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 65. 993 65. 993 0.2102 65. 783 59.74 1600 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 65.575 65.575 0 .2074 65. 368 59. 72 1610 . 00 0 . 0000 0.0000 65. 163 65. 163 0 .2045 ' 64 . 959 59.70 1620 . 00 0. 0000 0 .0000 64.757 64 .757 0 .2016 64 .556 59. 68 1630 .00 0 . 0000 0 .0000 64 .357 64 .357 0 . 1986 64 . 158 59. 66 1640 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 63. 963 63. 963 0 . 1958 63.767 59. 64 1650 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 63.574 63.574 0 . 1929 - 63 . 381 59. 62 1660 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 63. 191 63. 191 0 . 1901 63. 001 59. 61 1670 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 ' 62. 814 62 . 814 0. 1872 62. 627 59.59 1680 . 00 0 . 0000 0 .0000 62.442 62 .442 '0. 1842 62 .258 59.57 1690 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 62. 077 62. 077 0.1813 61. 896 59.55 1700.00 0. 0000 0 . 0000 61.717 61 .717 0 . 1784 61 .539 59.53 1710 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 61.363 61 .363 0 . 1756 61 . 188 59.52 1720 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 61 . 015 61 . 015 0 . 1728 60 . 842 59.50 1730 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 60. 672 60 . 672 0 .1698 60 .502 59.48 1740 . 00 0 . 0000 0 .0000 60.336 60 .336 0 . 1668 60 . 169 59. 47 1750 . 00 0 . 0000 0 .0000 60 . 005 60 . 005 0. 1639 59. 841 59.45 1760. 00 0 . 0000 0 .0000 59. 680 59. 680 0 . 1611 ' 59.519 59.44. 1770. 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 59.361 59.361 0 . 1582 59.202 59.42 1780 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 59. 047 59. 047 ' 0 . 1555 58 . 891 59.41 1790 . 00 0 . 0000- 0 .0000 58 .739 58 .739 , 0 . 1525 58 .586 59.39 1800 .00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 58.437 58 .437 0 . 1495 58 .287 59. 38 1810 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 58 . 141 58 . 141 0 . 14.65 57 . 994 59.36 1820 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 57 . 851 57 . 851 0 . 1436 57 . 707 59.35 1830 . 00 0 . 0000 0.0000 57 .566 57.566 0 . 1408 57 .425 59.33 1840 . 00 0 . 0000 0 .0000 57 .287 57.287 ' 0 . 1380 57 . 149 59.32 1850 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 57.014 57. 014 0 . 1352 56. 879 59.31 1860 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 56.747 56.747 0 . 1323 56. 614 59.29 1870. 00 11/18/92 Dodds Engineers, Incorpc ted page 15 TH... -MUFFS - PRELIMINARY DETEtNI.LON ANALYSIS Prepared By: Roy E. Lewis, Jr. , P.E. LEVEL POOL ROUTING TABLE LEVEL POOL ROUTING TABLE I1 I2 2S1 SUM 01 02+2S2 STAGE TIME cfs min > (ft) (min) 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 56.485 56.485 0 . 1292 56. 356 59.28 1880 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 56.230 56.230 0 . 1262 56. 103 59.27 1890 . 00 0 . 0000 0. 0000 55. 980 55. 980 0 . 1232 55. 857 59.26 1900 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 55.737 55.737 0 . 1203 55. 616 59.25 1910 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 55.499 55.499 0 . 1175 55 .381 59.23 1920 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 55.266 55.266 0 . 1148 55. 152 59.22 1930 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 55. 040 55. 040 0 . 1121 54 . 927 59.21 1940 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 54. 818 54 . 818 0 .1094 5.4 .709 59.20 1950 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 54 . 602 54 . 602 0 . 1062 54 .496 59. 19 1960 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 54.393 54 .393 0 . 1029 54 .290 59. 18 1970 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 54 . 191 54 . 191 0 . 0998 54 .091 59. 17 1980 .00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 53. 994 53. 994 0 . 0967 53 . 897 59. 16 1990 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 53. 804 53. 804 0 . 0938 53.710 59. 15 2000 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 53. 619 53. 619 0 . 0909 53 .528 59. 14 2010 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 53.440 53.440 0.0882 53 . 352 59. 13 2020 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 53.266 53.266 0. 0855 53. 181 59. 13 2030 . 00 0. 0000 0 .0000 53. 098 53.098 0. 082.9 53. 015 59. 12 2040 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 52. 934 52. 934 0 . 0803 52 . 854 59. 11 2050 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 52.776 52.776 0 . 0779 52 . 698 59. 10 2060 . 00 0 . 0000 0 .0000 52.-625 52. 625 0 . 0732 52 .552 59. 09 2070 . 00 0 . 0000 0 .0000 52.484 52.484 0 . 0679 52 .416 59. 09 2080 . 00 0 . 0000 0.0000 52.353 52.353 0 . 0630 52 .290 59. 08 2090 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 52.232 52.232 0 . 0585 52 . 173 59. 08 2100 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 52. 119 52.119 0 . 0543 52 . 065 59. 07 2110 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 52 . 014 52 . 014 0 . 0504 51 . 964 59. 07 2120 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 51. 917 51 . 917 0 . 0467 51 . 870 59. 06 2130 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 51. 827 51 . 827 0 . 0434 51 .784 59. 06 2140 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 51 .743 51 .743 0 . 0402 51 .703 59. 05 2150 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 51. 666 51 . 666 0 . 0373 51 . 629 59. 05 2160 .00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 51 .594 51 .594 0. 0346 51 .559 59. 04 2170 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 51 .527 51 .527 0. 0322 51 .495 59. 04 2180 . 00 0 . 0000 0 .0000 51 .465 51 .465 0 . 0298 51 .435 59. 04 2190 . 00 0 . 0000 0.0000 51.408 51.408 0 . 0277 51 .380 59. 04 2200 . 00 0 . 0000 0 .0000 51 .354 51 .354 0 . 0257 51 .328 59. 03 2210 .00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 51 .305 51 .305 0 . 0238 51 .281 59. 03 2220 . 00 0 . 0000 0 .0000 51.259 51.259 0 . 0221 51 .237 59. 03 2230 .00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 . 51.216 51.216 0 . 0205 51 . 195 59. 03 2240 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 51 .176 51 . 176 0. 0191 51 . 157 59. 02 2250 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 51 .140 51 . 140 0 . 0177 51 . 122 59. 02 2260 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 51 . 106 51 . 106 0 . 0164 51 . 089 59. 02 2270 . 00 0 . 0000 . 0 .0000 51. 074 51 .074 0 . 0152 51 . 059 59. 02 2280 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 51 . 045 51. 045 0 .0141 .51 . 031 59. 02 2290. 00 0 . 0000 0. 0000 51 . 017 51.017 0 . 0131 51 . 004 59. 02 2300 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 50 . 992 50. 992 0 . 0122 50 . 980 59.02 2310 . 00 0 .0000 0 . 0000 50 . :)u9 50. 969 0 . 0113 50 . 957 59. 01 2320 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 50. 947 50. 947 0 . 0105 50 . 936 59. 01 2330 . 00 0 . 0000 0 .0000 50. 927 50. 927 0. 0097 50 . 917 59. 01 2340 . 00 11/18/92 Dodds Engineers, Incorpc ted page 16 THE' LUFFS - PRELIMINARY DETENTION ANALYSIS Prepared By: Roy E. Lewis, Jr. , P.E. ' LEVEL POOL ROUTING TABLE LEVEL POOL ROUTING TABLE I1 I2 2S1 SUM 01 02+2S2 STAGE TIME < cfs min > (ft) (min) 0 .0000 0 . 0000 50 . 908 50 . 908 0. 0090 50 . 899 59. 01 2350 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 50. 891 50. 891 0 . 0084 50 . 882 59. 01 2360 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 50 . 874 50 . 874 0 . 0078 50 . 867 59. 01 2370 . 00 0 . 0000 0. 0000 50 . 860 50. 860 0. 0072 50 . 852 59. 01 2380 . 00 0 .0000 0 . 0000 50 . 846 50 . 846 0. 0067 50 . 839 59. 01 2390 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 . 50 . 833 50 . 833 0 . 0062 50 . 827 59. 01 2400 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 50. 821 50 . 821 0. 0058 50 . 815 59. 01 2410 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 50 . 810 50 . 810 0 . 0053 50 . 804 59. 01 2420 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 50.799 50 .799 0 . 0050 50 .794 59. 01 2430 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 50 .790 50 .790 0 . 0046 50 .785 59. 01 2440 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 50 .781 50.781 0 . 0043 50 . 777 59. 01 2450 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 50.773 50 .773 0 . 0040 50 .769 59. 01 2460 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 50 .765 50.765 0 . 0037 50 .761 59. 00 2470. 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 50.758 50 .758 0. 0034 50 .755 59. 00 2480 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 50 .751 50 .751 0 . 0032 50 .748 59. 00 2490 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 50 .745 50 .745 0 . 0029 50 .742 59. 00 2500 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 50.740 50.740 0 . 0027 50 .737 59. 00 2510 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 50.734 50.734 0 . 0025 50 .732 59. 00 2520 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 50.729 50.729 0 . 0023 50 .727 59. 00 2530 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 50 .725 50.725 0 . 0022 50 .723 59. 00 2540 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 50 .721 50.721 0 . 0020 50 .719 59. 00 2550 . 00 0 . 0000 0 .0000 50.717 50.717 0 . 0019 50 .715 59. 00 2560 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 50.713 50.713 0 . 0017 50 .712 59. 00 2570 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 50.710 50.710 . 0 . 0016 50 .708 59. 00 2580 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 50.707 50.707 0 . 0015 50 .705 59. 00 2590 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 50.704 50.704 0. 0014 50 .702 59. 00 2600 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 50.701 50.701 0. 0013 50 .700 59. 00 2610 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 50. 699 50. 699 0. 0012 50 . 698 59. 00 2620 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 . 50 . 696 50. 696 0 . 0011 50 . 695 59. 00 2630 . 00 0 . 0000 0. 0000 50 . 694 50. 694 0. 0010 50 . 693 59. 00 2640 . 00 0 . 0000 0,.0000 50 . 692 50. 692 0 . 0010 50 . 691 59. 00 2650 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 50 . 690. 50. 690 0 . 0009 50 . 690 59. 00 2660 . 00 0 . 0000 0.0000 50 . 689 50. 689 0 . 0008 50 . 688 59. 00 2670 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 50 . 687 50. 687 0 . 0008 50 . 686 59. 00 2680 . 00 0 . 0000 0.0000 50 . 686 50. 686 0 . 0007 50 . 685 59. 00 2690 . 00 0 . 0000 0.0000 50. 684 50. 684 0 . 0007 50 . 684 59. 00 2700 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 50. 683 50. 683 0. 0006 50 . 682 59. 00 2710 .00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 50 . 682 50. 682 0. 0006 50 . 681 59. 00 2720 . 00 0 . 0000 0. 0000 50 . 681 50. 681 0 . 0005 50 . 680 59. 00 2730 . 00 0 . 0000 0. 0000 50 . 680 50. 680 0 . 0005 50 . 679 59. 00 2740 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 50 . 679 50 . 679 0 . 0005 50 . 678 59. 00 2750 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 5.0. 678 50. 678 0 . 0004 50 . 677 59. 00 2760. 00 0 . 0000 0 .0000 50 . 677 50. 677 0 . 0004 50 . 677 59. 00 2770 .00 0 . 0000 0 .0000 50. 676 50. 676 0 . 0004 50 . 676 59. 00 2780 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 50 . 676_ 50. 676 0 . 0003 50 . 675 59. 00 2790 . 00 0 . 0000 0 .0000 50. 675 50. 675 0 . 0003 50 . 675 59. 00 2800 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 50. 674 50. 674 0 . 0003 . 50 . 674 59. 00 2810 . 00 11/18/92 Dodds Engineers, Incorpl ted page 17 ;3LUFFS - PRELIMINARY DETE1v1iON ANALYSIS Prepared By: Roy E. Lewis, Jr. , P.E. LEVEL POOL ROUTING TABLE LEVEL POOL ROUTING TABLE I1 I2 2S1 SUM 01 02+2S2 STAGE TIME cfs min > (ft) (min) 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 50 . 674 50. 674 0 . 0003 50 . 674 59. 00 2820 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 50 . 673 50. 673 0 . 0002 50 . 673 59. 00 2830 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 50 . 673 50. 673 0. 0002 50 . 673 59. 00 2840 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 50. 672 50. 672 0 . 0002 50 . 672 59. 00 2850 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 50 . 672 50. 672 0 . 0002 50 . 672 59. 00 2860 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 50. 672 50. 672 0 . 0002 50 . 671 59. 00 2870 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 50. 671 50. 671 0 . 0002 50 . 671 59. 00 2880 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 50 . 671 50. 671 0 . 0002 50 . 671 59. 00 2890 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 50 . 671 50. 671 0 . 0001 50 . 670 59. 00 2900 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 50 . 670 50. 670 0 . 0001 50 . 670 59. 00 2910 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 50 . 670 50. 670 0 . 0001 50 . 670 59. 00 2920 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 50 . 670 50. 670 0 . 0001 50 . 670 59. 00 2930 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 50 . 670 50. 670 0 . 0001 50 . 669 59. 00 2940 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 50 . 669 50. 669 0 . 0001 50 . 669 59. 00 2950 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 50 . 669 50. 669 0 . 0001 50 . 669 59. 00 2960 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 50 . 669 50. 669 0 . 0001 50 . 669 59.00 2970 . 00 0 . 0000 0. 0000 50 . 669 50. 669 0 . 0001 50 . 669 59. 00 2980 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 50 . 669 50. 669 0 . 0001 50 . 669 59. 00 2990 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 50 . 669 50. 669 0 . 0001 50 . 668 59. 00 3000 . 00 11/18/92 Dodds Engineers, IncorpoIiced page 18 THE BLUFFS - PRELIMINARY DETENTION ANALYSIS Prepared By: Roy E. Lewis, Jr. , P.E. ROUTING REPORT STORAGE LIST ID No. 1 Description: DETENTION POND . COMBINATION DISCHARGE ID No. 3 Description: ORIFICE + OVERFLOW STANDPIPE Structure: 1 Structure: Structure: 2 Structure: Structure: ROUTING CURVE STAGE STORAGE OUTFLOW 0+2S STAGE STORAGE OUTFLOW O+2S STAGE STORAGE OUTFLOW 0+2S (ft) (cf) (cfs) cfs-min (ft) (cf) (cfs) cfs-min (ft) (ct) (cfs) cfs-min 55.00 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 57.90 11020 0.0000 36.733 60.80 26360 0.7160 88.583 55.10 380.00 0.0000 1.2667 58.00 11400 0.0000 38.000 60.90 26980 0.7486 90.682 55.20 760.00 0.0000 2.5333 58.10 11780 0.0000 39.267 61.00 27600 0.7796 92.780 55.30 1140 0.0000 3.8000 58.20 12160 0.0000 40.533 61.10 28220 1.0238 95.091 55.40 1520 0.0000 5.0667 58.30 12540 0.0000 41.800 61.20 28840 1.1413 97.275 55.50 1900 0.0000 6.3333 58.40 12920 0.0000 43.067 61.30 29460 1.2370 99.437 55.60 2280 0.0000 7.6000 58.50 13300 0.0000 44.333 61.40 30080 1.3212 101.59 55.70 2660 0.0000 8.8667 58.60 13680 0.0000 45.600 61.50 30700 1.3977 103.73 55.80 3040 0.0000 10.133 58.70 14060 0.0000 46.867 61.60 31320 1.4685 105.87 55.90 3420 0.0000 11.400 58.80 14440 0.0000 48.133 61.70 31940 1.5350 108.00 56.00 3800 0.0000 12.667 58.90 14820 0.0000 49.400 61.80 32560 1.5980 110.13 56.10 4180 0.0000 13.933 59.00 15200 0.0000 50.667 61.90 33180 1.6580 112.26 56.20 4560 0.0000 15.200 59.10 15820 0.0772 52.811 62.00 33800 1.7155 114.38 56.30 4940 0.0000 16.467 59.20 16440 0.1092 54.909 62.10 34687 2.3867 118.01 56.40 5320 0.0000 17.733 59.30 17060 0.1338 57.000 62.20 35573 3.5663 122.14 56.50 5700 0.0000 19.000 59.40 17680 0.1545 59.088 62.30 36460 5.0762 126.61 56.60 6080 0.0000 20.267 59.50 18300 0.1727 61.173 62.40 37347 6.8533 131.34 56.70 6460 0.0000 21.533 59.60 18920 0.1892 63.256 62.50 38233 8.8608 136.31 56.80 6840 0.0000 22.800 59.70 19540 0.2043 65.338 62.60 39120 11.074 141.47 56.90 7220 0.0000 24.067 59.80 20160 0.2184 67.418 62.70 40007 13.475 146.83 57.00 7600 0.0000 25.333 59.90 20780 0.2317 69.498 62.80 40893 16.050 152.36 57.10 7980 0.0000 26.600 60.00 21400 0.2442 71.578 62.90 41780 16.509 155.78 57.20 8360 0.0000 27.867 ' 60.10 22020 0.3935 73.793 63.00 42667 17.328 159.55 57.30 8740 0.0000 29.133 60.20 22640 0.4617 75.928 63.10 43553 18.109 163.29 57.40 9120 0.0000 30.400 60.30 23260 0.5163 78.050 • 63.20 44440 18.855 166.99 57.50 9500 0.0000 31.667 60.40 23880 0.5636 80.164 63.30 45327 19.573 170.66 57.60 9880 0.0000 32.933 60.50 24500 0.6061 82.273 63.40 46213 20.264 174.31 57.70 10260 0.0000 60.60 25120 0.6453 84.379 57.80 10640 0.0000 3n.•,67 60.70 25740 0.6817 86.482 11/18/92 - Dodds Engineers, Incorpted page 19 THE BLUFFS - PRELIMINARY DETENTION ANALYSIS Prepared By: Roy E. Lewis, Jr. , P.E. LEVEL POOL ROUTING TABLE 10-YEAR ROUTING MATCH Q (cfs) 1 . 90 INFLOW Q (cfs) : 3. 67 PEAK STAGE (ft) : 60.76 PEAK OUTFLOW 0 .70 PEAK TIME: 790 . 00 min. INFLOW HYD No. : 5 OUTFLOW HYD No. : 8 LEVEL POOL ROUTING TABLE I1 I2 2S1 SUM 01 02+2S2 STAGE TIME < cfs min > (ft) (min) 0 . 0000 0 .0010 0 . 0000 0 . 0010 0.0000 - 0 . 0010 55. 00 40 . 00 0 . 0010 0 . 0094 0. 0010 0. 0114 0 . 0000 0 . 0114 55. 00 50 .00 0 . 0094 0 .0272 0.0114 0 . 0481 0 . 0000 0 . 0481 55. 00 60 . 00 0 . 0272 0 . 0480 0 .0481 0 .1233 0 .0000 0 .1233 55 . 00 70 . 00 0 . 0480 0 . 0685 0 .1233 0 .2398 0 . 0000 0 .2398 55 . 01 80 . 00 0 . 0685 0 . 0873 0 .2398 0 .3956 0 . 0000 0 .3956 55 . 02 90 . 00 0 . 0873 0 . 1041 . 0 .3956 0 .5869 0. 0000 0 .5869 55 . 03 100 . 00 0 . 1041 0 . 1290 0 .5869 0 . 8199 0 . 0000 0 . 8199 55 . 05 110 . 00 0 . 1290 0. 1582 0 . 819.; 1. 1071 0. 0000 1 . 1071 55 . 06 120. 00 0 . 1582 0 . 1799 1 .1071 1.4452 0 . 0000 1 . 4452 55 . 09 , . 130 . 00 0 . 1799 0 . 1971 1.4452 1 . 8222 0 . 0000 1 . 8222 55 . 11 140. 00 0 . 1971 0 .2113 1 . 8222 2 .2307 0. 0000 . 2 .2307 55. 14 150. 00 0 .2113 0 .2235 2.2307 2 . 6655 0. 0000 2 . 6655 55. 18 160 . 00 0 .2235 0 .2480 2 . 6655 3. 1369 0 . 0000 3 . 1369 55 .21 170. 00 0 .2480 0 .2782 3.1369 3. 6631 0. 0000 3. 6631 55 .25 180 .00 0 .2782 0 .2973 3. 6631 4 .2386 0 . 0000 4 .2386 55.29 190. 00 0 .2973 0 .3108 4 .2386 4 . 8468 0 . 0000 4 . 8468 55.33 200 . 00 0 . 3108 0 .3212 4 .8468 5.4787 0 . 0000 5.4787 55. 38 210 . 00 0 .3212 0 .3296 5.4787 6. 1295 0 . 0000 6. 1295 55.43 220 .00 0 . 3296 0 .3530 6.1295 6. 8121 0 . 0000 6. 8121 55 . 48 230 . 00 0 .3530 0 .3831 6. 8121 7 .5483 0 . 0000 7 .5483 55 .54 240 . 00 0 . 3831 0 .4002 7 .5483 8 .3317 0 . 0000 8 .3317 55 . 60 250 . 00 0 . 4002 0 .4111 8 .3.317 9. 1430 0 . 0000 9. 1430 55. 66 260 . 00 0 . 4111 0 .4188 9. 1430 9. 9729 0 . 0000 9. 9729 55 .72 270 . 00 0 .4188 0 .4249 9. 9729 10. 817 0 . 0000 10 . 817 55 . 79 , 280 .00 0 .4249 0 .4514 10. 817 11. 693 0 . 0000 11 . 693 55 . 85 290 .00 0 . 4514 0 .4902 11. 693 12. 635 0 . 0000 12 . 635 55 . 92 300 .00 0 .4902 0 .5163 12. 635 13. 641 0 .0000 13. 641 56. 00 310 . 00 0 .5163 0 .5367 - 13. 641 14. 694 0 . 0000 14 . 694 56. 08 320 . 00 0 .5367 0 .5540 14. 694 15.785 0 . 0000 15. 785 56.16 330 . 00 0 .5540 0 .5696 15.785 16. 908 0 . 0000 16. 908 56.25 340 .00 0 .5696 0 . 6110 1.6. 908 18. 089 0 . 0000 18 . 089 56.33 350 . 00 0 . 6110 '0 . 6646 18 . 08.9 19.365 0 . 0.000 19.365 56.43 ' 360 .00 0 . 6646 0 . 6975 19.365 20.7- 0 .0000 20 .727 56.53 370 .00 0 . 6975 0 .7209 20 .727 22. 14. 0 .0000 22.145 56. 64 380 .00 0 .7209 0 .7397 .. . 145 23. 606 0 . 0000 23. 606, 56.75 390 . 00 0 .7397 0 .7560 2.; . 606 25. 101 0 .0000 25. 101 56. 86 400 . 00 0 .7560 0 . 8619 25.101 26.719 0 . 0000 26.719 56. 98 410 . 00 0 . 8619 1. 0108 26.719 28.592 0 . 0000 28 .592 57 . 11 420 . 00 1 . 0108 1. 0906 28 .592 30. 693 0 . 0000 30 . 693 57 .26 430 .00 1 . 0906 1 .2537 30. 693 33. 038 0 . 0000 33. 038 57 .42 440 .00 11/18/92 Dodds Engineers, Incorpo -.ed page 20 THE ._LUFFS - PRELIMINARY DETEN__JN ANALYSIS Prepared By: Roy E. Lewis, Jr. , P.E. LEVEL POOL ROUTING TABLE LEVEL POOL ROUTING TABLE I1 I2 2S1 SUM 01 02+2S2 STAGE TIME cfs min > (ft) (min) 1 .2537 1 .4578 33.038 35.749 0 . 0000 35.749 57 . 61 450 . 00 1 .4578 1. 9903 35.749 39. 197 0 . 0000 39. 197 57 . 82 460 . 00 1 . 9903 3.2426 39. 197 44.430 0 . 0000 44 .430 58 . 09 470 . 00 3 .2426 3. 6734 44 .430 51.346 0 . 0000 51 .346 58 .51 480 . 00 3 . 6734 2 . 9094 51 .322 57. 905 0 . 0245 57 . 880 59. 03 490 . 00 2 . 9094 2 . 1969 57 .738 62. 844 0 . 1425 62.701 59.34 500 . 00 2 . 1969 1 .7559 62.517 66. 469 0 . 1848 66.285 59.57 510 . 00 1 .7559 1 .5665 66. 074 69.396 0 .2108 69. 186 59.75 520 . 00 1 .5665 1 .3.518 . 68 . 956 71. 874 0 .2297 71. 645 59. 88 530 . 00 1 .3518 1. 1239 71 .396 73. 872 0 .2487 73. 623 60 . 00 540 . 00 1 .1239 1 . 0252 73.241 75.390 0 .3820 75.. 0'08 60 . 09 . 550 . 00 1 . 0252 0 . 9839 74.576 76.585 0. 4323 76. 153 60 . 16 560 . 00 0 . 9839 0 . 9680 75. 685 77. 637 0 . 4675 77 . 169 60 .21 570 . 00 0 . 9680 0 . 9633 76. 676 78. 607 0 .4936 78 . 113 60 .26 580 . 00 0 . 9633 0 . 9636 77 .596 79.522 0 .5177 79. 005 60 . 30 590 . 00 0 . 9636 0 . 9660 78 .467 80.397 0 .5377 79. 859 60 .35 600 . 00 0 . 9660 0 . 9693 79.302 81.237 0 .5568 80 . 681 60 .39 610 . 00 0 . 9693 0 . 9729 80 . 107 82.049 , 0 .5740 81 .475 60 . 42 620 . 00 0 . 9729 0 . 9767 80 . 885 82. 834 0 .5900 82 .244 60 .46 630. 00 0 . 9767 0 . 9805 81 . 639 83.596 0 . 6056 82 . 990 60 .50 640 . 00 0 . 9805 0 . 9342 82 .371 84.286 0 . 6195 83. 666 60 .53 650. 00 0 . 9342 0 . 8652 83. 034 84 . 833 0 . 6320 84 .201 .60 .57 660 . 00 0 . 8652 0 . 8359 83.559 85.261 0 . 6420 84 . 619 60 .59 670 . 00 0 . 8359 0 . 8242 83. 969 85. 629 0 . 6494 84 . 980 60. 61 680 . 00 0 . 8242 0 . 8202 84 .324 85. 969 0 . 6557 85.313 60 . 63 690 . 00 0 . 8202 0 . 8197 84. 651 , 86.291 0 . 6615 85. 630 6.0 . 64 700 . 00 0 . 8197 0 . 8207 84. 963 86. 603 0 . 6669 85 . 936 60 . 66 710 . 00 0 . 8207 0. 8223 85.264 86. 907 0 . 6723 86.235 60 . 67 720. 00 0 . 8223 0 . 8242 85.557 87.204 0 . 6774 86.527 60 . 69 730. 00 0 . 8242 0. 8262 85. 844 • 87.495 0 . 6824 86. 812 60 .70 740 . 00 0 . 8262 0 . 8283 86. 125 87.780 0 . 6871 87 . 092 60 .72 750 . 00 0 . 8283 0 . 8303 86.401 88. 059 0 . 6917 87 .368 60 .73 760 . 00 0 . 8303 0 .7839 86. 671 88.286 0 . 6962 87 .590 60 .74 770 . 00 0 .7839 0 .7159 86. 890 88.390 0 . 6998 87 . 690 60 .75 780 . 00 0 .7159 0 . 6863 86. 988 88.390 0 . 7014 87 . 689 60 .76 . 790. 00 0 . 6863 0 . 6738 86. 988 88 .348 0 . 7014 87 . 646 60 .76 800 . 00 0 . 6738 0 . 6689 86. 945 88.288 0 . 7007 87 .587 60 .76 810 . 00 0 . 6689 0 . 6673 86. 888 88.224 0 . 6998 87 .524 60 .75 820. 00 0 . 6673 0 . 6673 86. 825 88. 160 0 . 6987 87 . 461 60 .75 830 . 00 0 . 6673 0 . 6679 86.764 88. 099 0 . 6977 87 .401 60 .75 840 . 00 0 . 6679 0 . 6688 86.704 88. 041 0 . 6967 87 .344 60 .74 850 . 00 0 . 6688 0 . 6698 86. 648 87. 987 0 . 6958 87 .291 60 .74 860 . 0.0 , 0 . 6698 0 . 6709 86.596 87. 937 0 . 6949 87 .242 60 .74 870 . 00 0 . 6709 0 . 6719 86.548 87. 891 0 . 6941 87 . 197 60 .74 880 . 00 0 . 6719 0 . 6500 86.503 87 . 825 0 . 6934 87 . 132 60 . 73 890 . 00 0 . 6500 0 . 6177 86.439 87.707 0 . 6923 87 . 015 60 .73 900 . 00 0 . 6177 0 . 6038 86.324 87.546 0 . 6904 86. 855 . 60 . 73 . 910 . 00 11/18/92 Dodds Engineers, Incorpo, ed page 21 THE ,BLUFFS - PRELIMINARY DETEN'J...,,N ANALYSIS Prepared By: Roy E. Lewis, Jr. , P.E. LEVEL POOL ROUTING TABLE LEVEL POOL ROUTING TABLE I1 I2 2S1 SUM 01 02+2S2 STAGE TIME < cfs min > (ft) . " (min) 0 . 6038 0 .5980 86. 167 87.369 0 . 6878 86. 681 60 .72 920 . 00 0 .5980 0 .5959 85. 997 87.190 0 . 6850 86.506 60 . 71 930 . 00 0 .5959 0 .5954 85. 823 87. 015 0 . 6821 86. 333 60 .70 940 . 00 0 .5954 0 .5956 85. 654 86. 845 0 . 6791 86. 165 60 . 69 950 . 00 0 .5956 0 .5961 85.489 86. 681 0 . 6762 86. 005 60 . 68 960 . 00 0 .5961 0 .5967 85.331 86.524 0 . 6734 85 . 851 60 . 68 970 . 00 0 .5967 0.5974 85.180 86.374 0 . 6708 85 .703 60 . 67 980 . 00 0 .5974 0 .5982 85. 035 86.231 0 . 6682 85 .562 60 . 66 990 . 00 0 .5982 0 .5989 84 . 897 86.094 0 . 6658 85 . 428 60 . 66 1000 . 00 0 .5989 0 .5662 84 .764 85. 930 0 . 6634 85 .266 60 . 65 1010 . 00 0 .5662 0 .5186 84. 605 85. 690 0 . 6606 85 . 030 60 . 64 1020 . 00 0 .5186 0 .4977 84.373 85.389 0 . 6565 84. 733 ,60 . 63 1030 . 00 0 . 4977 0 .4887 84 . 082 85. 068 0 . 6514 84 .417 60 . 62 1040 . 00 0 .4887 0 .4849 83.771 84.744 0. 6459 84 . 098 60 . 60 1050 . 00 0 .4849 0 .4835 83.458 84.427 0. 6401 83.787 60 .59 1060 . 00 0 .4835 0 .4831 83.152 84.119 0. 6343 83.485 60 .57 1070 . 00 0 .4831 0 .4832 82. 856 83. 822 0. 6287 83. 194 60 .56 1080 . 00 0 .4832 0 .4834 82 .570 83.537 0 . 6232 82 . 914 60 .54 1090 . 00 0 .4834 0.4838 82 .296 83.263 0. 6180 82 . 645 60 .53 1100 . 00 0 .4838 0 . 4842 82. 032 83.000 0 . 6131 82 . 387 60 .52 1110 . 00 0 . 4842 0 . 4846 81.778 82.747 0 . 6083 82 . 139 60 .51 1120 . 00 0 . 4846 0 .4850 81.535 82.505 0 . 6034 81 . 902 60 . 49 1130 . 00 0 . 4850 0 .4854 81.303 82.273 0 .5987 81 . 675 60 . 48 1140 . 00 0 . 4854 0 .4858 81 . 081 82. 052 0 .5941 81 . 458 60 . 47 1150: 00 0 . 4858 0 .4862 $0. 868 81. 840 0 .5897 81 .250 60 .46 1160 . 00 0 . 4862 0 .4866 80. 665 81. 637 0 .5855 81 . 052 60 .45 1170 . 00 0 . 4866 0 .4870 80 .470 81.444 0 .5815 80 . 862 60 . 44 1180 . 00 0 .4870 0 .4874 80 .285 81.259 0 .5777 80 . 681 60 . 43 1190 . 00 0 .4874 0 .4878 80 . 107 81. 083 0 .5740 80.509 60 .42 1200 . 00 0 .4878 0 .4882 79. 938 80. 914 0 .5705 80 .343 60 .42 1210 . 00 0 .4882 0.4885 79.776 80.753 0 .5672 80 . 186 60 .41 1220 . 00 0 .4885 0 .4889 79. 622 80.599 0 .5640 80 . 035 60 . 40 1230 . 00 0 .4889 0 .4893 79. 474 80.453 0 .5607 79. 892 60 .39 1240 .00 0 .4893 0 .4897 79.334 80.313 0 .5575 79.756 60 .39 1250 . 00 0 . 4897 0 .4901 79.201 80. 181 0 .5545 79. 627 60 .38 1260 . 00 0 .4901 0 .4904 79. 075 80. 056 0 .5516 79.504 60 .37 1270 . 00 0 . 4904 0 .4908 78 . 955 79. 936 0 .5488 79.388 60 .37 1280 . 00 0 .4908 0 .4912 . 78 . 841 79. 823 0 .5462 79.277 60 .36 1290 . 00 0 . 4912 0. 4915' ,, . 78.733 79.716 0 .5438 79. 172 60 . 36 1300 . 00 0 . 4915 0 .4919 78 . 631 79. 614 0 .5414 79. 073 60 . 35 1310 . 00 0 . 4919 0 .4922 78 .534 79.518 0 .5392 78 . 979 60 .35 1320 . 00 0 .4922 0 .4926 7.8 . 441 79.426 0 .5371 78 . 889 60 . 34 1330 . 00 0 . 4926 0 .4929 78 .354 79. ., J 0 .5351 78 . 805 60 .34 1340 . 00 0 .492 0 . 4933 78.271 79.258 0 .5332 78 .724 60 .34 1350 . 00 0 .4933 0 .4936 78 . 193 79. 180 0 .5314 78 . 649 60 .33 1360 . 00 0 . 4936 0 .4940 78 . 119 79. 106 0 .5297 78 .577 60 . 33 1370 . 00 0 .4940 0 .4943 78 .049 79. 037 0 .5281 78 .509 60 .32 1380 . 00 11/18/92 JDodds Engineers, Incorpo_ 'fed page 22 THL'�,LUFFS - PRELIMINARY DETEN1a.)N ANALYSIS Prepared By: Roy E. Lewis, Jr. , P.E. LEVEL POOL ROUTING TABLE LEVEL POOL ROUTING TABLE Il I2 2S1 SUM 01 02+2S2 STAGE TIME < cfs min > (ft) (min) 0 . 4943 0 .4946 77 . 982- 78. 971 0 .5266 78 .44,5 60 .32 1390 . 00 0 .4946 0 . 4950 77. 920 78. 909 0 .5251 78 .384 60 .32 1400 . 00 0 . 4950 0 . 4953 77 . 860 78. 851 0 .5238 78 .327 60 .32 1410 . 00 0 .4953' 0 . 4956 77 . 804 78.795 - 0 .5225 78 .273 60 .31 1420 . 00 0 .4956 0 . 4960 77 .751 78. 743 0 .5213 78 .222 60.31 1430. 00 0 .4960 0.4963 77 .702 78 . 694 0 .5201 78. 174 60 .31 1440 . 00 0 . 4963 0 .3585 77 . 655 78.509 0 .5191 77 . 990 60 .31 1450 . 00 0 .3585 0 . 1594 77 .476 77. 994 0 .5148 77 . 479 60 .30 1460 . 00 0 .1594 0 . 0708 76. 977 77.207 0 .5016 76.706 60 .27 1470 . 00 0 . 0708 0 . 0315 76.224 76.326 0 .4817 75. 845 60 .24 1480 . 00 0 . 0315 0 . 0140 75.386 75.431 0 .4590 74 . 972 60 .20 1490 . 00 0 . 0140 0 . 0062 74.541 74.561 0 .4311 74 . 130 60 . 16 1500 . 00 0 . 0062 0 . 0028 73.726 73.735 0 .4042 73.330 60 . 12 1510 . 00 0 . 0028 0 . 0012 72. 968 72. 972 0 .3623 72. 610 60 . 08 1520 . 00 0 . 0012 0 . 0005 72 .296 72.298 0 .3138 ' 71 . 984 60 . 05 1530 . 00 0 . 0005 0 . 0002 71 .713 71.713 0 .2716 71 .442 60. 02 1540 . 00 0 . 0002 0 . 0001 71 .198 71. 199 0 .2434 70 . 955 59. 99 1550 .00 0 . 0001 0. 0000 70 .715 70.715 0 .2405 70. 474 59. 97 1560 .00 0 . 0000 0. 0000 70 .237 70.237 0 .2376 69. 999 59. 95 1570 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 69.765 69.765 0 .2347 69.530 59. 92 1580 . 00 0 . 0000 0 .0000 69.298 69.298 0 .2319 69.066 59. 90 1590 . 00 0. 0000 0 . 0000 68 . 837 68. 837 0 .2289 68 . 608 59. 88 1600 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 68.382 68.382 0 .2260 68 . 156 59. 86 1610 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 67. 933 67. 933 0 .2231 67 .710 59. 84 1620 . 00 0 . 0000 0. 0000 . 67 .490 67.490 0 .2203 67 .269 59. 81 1630 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 67 . 052 67. 052 0 .2174 66. 834 59. 79 1640 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 66. 620 66. 620 0 .2145 66.405 59. 77 1650 . 00 0 .0000 0 . 0000 66. 19,4 66. 194 0 .2116 65 . 982 59.75 1660 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 65.774 65.774 0 .2087 '65.565 59.73 1670 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 65.359 65.359 0 .2059 65. 153 59.71 1680 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 64 . 950 64. 950 0 .2030 64 .747 59. 69 1690 . 00 0 . 0000 0. 0000 ' 64 .547 64.547 0 .2000 64 .347 59. 67 1700 .00 0 . 0000 0. 0000 64 . 150 64.150 0 . 1971 63 . 953 59. 65 1710 . 00 0 . 0000 0 .0000 63.759 63.759 0 . 1943 63 .564 59. 63 1720 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 63.373 63.373 0 . 1914 63. 181 59. 61 1730 . 00 0 . 0000 0 .0000 62. 993 62. 993 0 . 1886 62 . 804 59. 60 1740 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 62. 619 62. 619 0 . 1856 62 .433 59.58 1750 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 62 .250 62.250 0 . 1827 62 . 068 59.56 1760 . 00 0 . 0000 0. 0000 61 . 888 61. 888 0 . 1798 61 .708 59 .54 1770 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 " 61.531 61.531 0 . 1769 61 . 354 59.53 1780 . 00 0. 0000 0 .0000 61 . 180 61. ' 80 0 . 1741 61 . 006 59.51 1790 .00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 60 . 835 60. 635 0 . 1712 60 . 663. 59. 49 1800 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 60 .495 60.495 0 . 1682 60 .327 59. 48 1810 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 60 .162 60. 162 0 . 1653 59. 996 59. 46 1820 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 59. 834 59. 834 0 . 1624 59. 672 59.44 1830 .00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 59.512 59.512 0 .1596 59.352 59.43 1840 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 59. 196 59. 196 0 . 1568 59. 039 59. 41 1850 . 00 11/18/92 , Dodds Engineers, Incorpo: ed page 23 THE aLUFFS - PRELIMINARY DETEN`i.LUN ANALYSIS Prepared By: Roy E. Lewis, Jr. , P.E. LEVEL POOL ROUTING TABLE LEVEL POOL ROUTING TABLE I1 I2 2S1 SUM 01 02+2S2 STAGE TIME cfs min > (ft) (min) 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 58 . 885 58.885 0 . 1540 58 .731 59.40 1860. 00 0 . 0000 0.0000 58 .580 58.580 0 . 1509 58 .429 59.38 1870 . 00 0 . 0000 0 .0000 58 .281 58 .281 0 . 1479 58 . 133 59. 37 1880 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 57 . 988 57 . 988 0 . 1450 57 . 843 59.35 1890 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 57 .701 57.701 0 . 1421 57 .559 59. 34 1900 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 57 .420 57 .420 0 .1393 57 .280 59.33 1910 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 57 .144 57 . 144 0 . 1365 57 . 007 59.31 1920 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 56. 873 56. 873 0. 1338 56.740 59. 30 1930 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 56. 609 56. 609 0 . 1307 .56.478 59.29 1940 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 56.350 . 56.350 0 . 1276 56.223 59.28 1950 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 56. 098 56. 098 0 . 1246 55. 974 59.26 1960 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 55. 852 55. 852 0 . 1217 55.73,0 59.25 1970 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 55. 611 55. 611 0 . 1189 55. 492 . 59.24 1980 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 55.3'76 55.376 0 .1161 55.260 59.23 1990 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 55.147 55. 147 0 . 1133 55 . 034 59.22 2000 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 54. 923 ' ' 54 . 92.3 0 .1107 54 . 812 59.21 2010 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 54.704 54 .704 0 . 1077 54 .597 59.20 2020 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 54.492 54 .492 0 . 1045 54 .388 59.19 2030 . 00 0 . 0000 0. 0000 54.287 54 .287 0 . 1013 54 . 185 59. 18 2040 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 54. 087 54. 087 0 . 0982 53. 989 59. 17 2050 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 53. 894 53. 894 0 . 0952 53.798 59. 16 2060 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 53.706 53.706 0 . 0923 53. 614 59. 15 2070 . 00 , 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 53.524 53.524 0 . 0895 53 .435 59. 14 2080 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 53.348 53.348 0 . 0868 53 .261 59. 13 2090 .00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 53. 177 53.177 0 . 0841 53 . 093 59. 12 2100 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 53. 012 53. 012 0 . 0815 52 . 930 59. 11 2110 . 00 0 . 0000 , 0 . 0000 52. 851 52 . 851 0 . 0791 52 . 772 59. 11 2120 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 52. 696 52 . 696 0 . 0758 52 . 620 59. 10 2130 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 52.550 52.550 0 . 0704 52 . 480 59. 09 2140 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 52.414 52 .414 0 . 0653 52 . 349 59. 08 2150 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 52.288 52 .288 0 . 0606 52 .228 59. 08 2160 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 52. 172 52 .172 0 . 0562 52 . 115 59. 07 2170 . 00 0 . 0000 0.0000 52. 063 52. 063 0 . 0522 52 . 011 59. 07 2180 . 00 0 . 0000 0 .0000 51 . 962 51 . 962 0 . 0484 51 . 914 59. 06 2190 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 51. 869 51 . 869 0 . 0449 51 . 824 59. 06 2200 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 51.782 51.782 0 . 0417 51 .741 59. 05 2210 . 00 0 . 0000 0 .0000 51.702 51 .702 0. 0387 51 . 663 59. 05 2220 . 00 0 . 0000 0 .0000 51. 627 51 . 627 0 . 0359 51 .592 59. 05 2230. 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 51 .558 51 .558 0 . 0333 51 .525 59. 04 2240 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 51 .494 51 .494 0 . 0309 51 . 463 59. 04 .2250 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 51 .434 51.434 0 . 0287 51 . 406 59. 04 . 2260. 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 51 .379 51.379 0 . 0266 51 .352 59. 03 2270 . 00 0 . 0000 0. 0000 51 .328 51.328 0 . 0247 51 .303 59. 03 2280 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 51 .280 51.280 0 . 0229 51 .257 59. 03 2290 . 00 0 . 0000 0 .0000 51.236 51 .236 0 . 0213 . 51 .215 59. 03 2300 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 51. 195 51 .195 0 . 0197 51 . 175 59. 03 2310. 00 0 . 0000 0. 0000 51.157 51 .157 0. 0183 51. 139 59. 02 2320 . 00 11/18/92 'Dodds Engineers, Incorpo;; ed page 24 THE'1LUFFS - PRELIMINARY DETEN`r'ruN ANALYSIS Prepared By: Roy E. Lewis, Jr. , P.E. LEVEL POOL ROUTING TABLE LEVEL POOL ROUTING TABLE I1 12 2S1 SUM 01 02+2S2 STAGE TIME < cfs min > (ft) (min) 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 51. 122 51 .122 0 . 0170 51 . 105 59. 02 2330 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 51. 089 51 . 089 0 . 0158 51. 073 59. 02 2340 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 51 . 058 51 . 058 0 . 0146 51 .044 59. 02 2350 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 51 . 030 51 . 030 0 . 0136 51 .017 59. 02 2360 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 51 . 004 51. 004 0 . 0126 50 . 991 59. 02 2370 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 50. 980 50 . 980 0 . 0117 50 . 968 59. 02 2380 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 50 . 957 50 . 957 0 . 0109 50 . 946 59. 01 2390 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 50. 936 50. 936 0 . 0101 50 . 926 59. 01 2400 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 50 . 917 50. 917 0 . 0093 50 . 907 59. 01 2410 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 50. 899 50. 899 0 . 0087 50 . 890 59. 01 2420 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 50. 882 50 . 882 0. 0080 50 . 874 59. 01 2430 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 50. 866 50 . 866 0 . 0075 50 . 859 59. 01 2440 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 50 . 852 50 . 852 0 . 0069 50 . 845 59. 01 2450 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 50 . 839 50 . 839 0 . 0064 50. 832 59. 01 2460 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 50 . 826 50 . 826 0`. 0060 50 . 820 59. 01 2470 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 50 . 815 50 . 815 0 . 0055 50 . 809 59. 01 2480 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 50. 804 50 . 804 0 . 0051 50 .799 59. 01 2490 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 50.794 50 .794 0 . 0048 50 .789 59. 01 2500 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 50.785 50 .785 0 . 0044 50 .781 59. 01 2510 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 50.777 50 .777 0 . 0041 50 . 772 59. 01 2520 . 00 0 . 0000 0 .0000 50.769 50 .769 0 . 0038 50 .765 59. 00 2530 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 50.761 50 .761 0 . 0035 50 .758 59. 00 2540 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 50.754 50 .754 0 . 0033 50 .751 59. 00 2550 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 50 .748 50 .748 0 . 0030 50 .745 59. 00 2560 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 50 .742 50.742 0 . 0028 50 .739 59. 00 2570 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 50 .737 50 .737 0 . 0026 50 .734 59. 00 2580 . 00 0 . 0000 0. 0000 50 .732 50 .732 0.0024 50 . 729 59. 00 2590 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 50.727 50 .727 0 .0023 50 . 725 59. 00 2600 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 50.723 50 .723 0 . 0021 50 .721 59. 00 2610 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 50.719 50 .719 0 . 0019 50 .717 59. 00 2620 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 50 .715 50 .715 0 . 0018 50 .713 59. 00 2630 .00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 50 .711 50 .711 0 . 0017 50 .710 59. 00 2640 . 00 0 . 0000 0 .0000 50 .708 50 . 708 0 .0016 50 . 707 59. 00 2650 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 50 .705 50.705 0 . 0014 50 .704 59. 00 2660 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 50.702 50 .702 0 . 0013 50 .701 59. 00 2670 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 50 .700 50 .700 0 . 0012 50 . 699 59. 00 2680 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 50 . 697 50. 697 0 . 0012 50 . 696 59. 00 2690 . 00 0 . 0000 0 .0000 50 . 695 50. 695 0 . 0011 50 . 694 59. 00 2700 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 50. 693 50 . '1'3 0 . 0010 50 . 692 59. 00 2710 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 50 . 691 50 . ,91 0 . 0009 50 . 690 59. 00 2720 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 50 . 690 50. 690 0 .0009 50 . 689 59.00 2730 . 00 0 . 0000 0. 0000 50)688 50. 688 0 . 0008 50 . 687 59. 00 2740 . 00 0 . 0000 0 .0000 50 . 686 50. 686 0 . 0007 50 . 686 59. 00 2750 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 50 . 685 50. 685 0 . 0007 50 . 684 59. 00 2760 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 50. 684 50. 684 0 . 0006 50 . 683 59. 00 2770 . 00 0. 0000 0 . 0000 50 . 682 50. 682 0 . 0006 50 . 682 59. 00 2780 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 50 . 681 50. 681 0. 0005 50 . 681 59. 00 2790 . 00 11/18/92 Dodds Engineers, Incorpo ed page 25 THE'-.:;'CUFFS - PRELIMINARY DETEN-N ANALYSIS Prepared By: Roy E. Lewis, Jr. , P.E. LEVEL POOL ROUTING TABLE LEVEL POOL ROUTING TABLE I1 I2 2S1 SUM 01 02+2S2 STAGE TIME < cfs min > (ft) (min) 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 50. 680 50. 680 0 . 0005 50 . 680 59. 00 2800 . 00 0 . 000.0 0 . 0000 50 . 679 50. 679 0 . 0005 50 . 679 59. 00 2810 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 50 . 678 50. 678 0 . 0004 50 . 678 59. 00 2820 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 50 . 677 50. 677 0 . 0004 50 . 677 59. 00 2830 . 00 0 .0000 0 . 0000 50. 677 50. 677 0 . 0004 50 . 676 59. 00 2840 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 50. 676 50. 676 0 . 0003 50 . 676 59. 00 2850 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 5.0. 675 50. 675 0 . 0003 50 . 675 59. 00 2860 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 50 . 675 50. 675 0 . 0003 50 . 674 59. 00 2870 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 50. 674 50 . 674 0 . 0003 50 . 674 59. 00 2880 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 5.0 . 674 50. 674 0 . 0003 50 . 673 59. 00 2890 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 50 . 673 50. 673 0. 0002 50 . 673 59. 00 2900 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 50 . 673 50. 673 0 . 0002 50 . 672 59. 00 2910 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 50 . 672 50. 672 0 . 0002 50 . 672 59. 00 2920 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 50. 672 50. 672 0 .0002 50_. 672 59. 00 2930 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 50. 671 50. 671 0 . 0002 50 . 671 59. 00 2940 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 50 . 671 50. 671 0 . 0002 50 . 671 59.00 2950 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 50 . 671 50. 671 0 . 0002 50 . 671 59. 00 2960 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 50 . 670 50. 670 0.0001 50 . 670 59. 00 2970 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 50 . 670 50. 670 0 .0001 50 . 670 59. 00 2980 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 50 . 670 50. 670 0 . 0001 50 . 670 59. 00 2990 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 50. 670 50. 670 0 . 0001 50 . 670 59. 00 3000 . 00 11/18/92 Dodds Engineers; Incorpolaied page 26 THE BLUFFS - PRELIMINARY DETENTION ANALYSIS Prepared By: Roy E. Lewis, Jr. , P.E. ROUTING REPORT STORAGE LIST ID No. 1 Description: DETENTION POND COMBINATION DISCHARGE ID No. 3 Description: ORIFICE + OVERFLOW STANDPIPE Structure: 1 Structure: Structure: 2 Structure: Structure: ROUTING CURVE STAGE STORAGE OUTFLOW 0+2S STAGE STORAGE OUTFLOW 0+25 STAGE STORAGE OUTFLOW 0+2S (ft) (cf) (cfs) cfs-min (ft) (cf) (cfs) cfs-min (ft) (cf) (cfs) cfs-min 55.00 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 57.90 11020 0.0000 36.733 60.80 26360 0.7160 88.583 55.10 380.00 0.0000 1.2667 58.00 11400 0.0000 38.000 60.90 26980 0.7486 90.682 55.20 760.00 0.0000 2.5333 58.10 11780 0.0000 39.267 61.00 27600 0.7796 92.780 55.30 1140 0.0000 3.8000 58.20 12160 0.0000 40.533 61.10 28220 1.0238 95.091 55.40 1520 0.0000 5.0667 58.30 12540 0.0000 41.800 61.20 28840 1.1413 97.275 55.50 1900 0.0000 6.3333 58.40 12920 0.0000 43.067 61.30 29460 1.2370 99.437 55.60 2280 0.0000 7.6000 58.50 13300 0.0000 44.333 .61.40 30080 1.3212 101.59 55.70 2660 0.0000 8.8667 58.60 13680 0.0000 45.600 61.50 30700 1.3977 103.73 55.80 3040 0.0000 10.133 58.70 14060 0.0000 46.867 61.60 31320 1.4685 105.87 55.90 3420 0.0000 11.400 58.80 14440 0.0000 48.133 61.70 31940 1.5350 108.00 56.00 3800 0.0000 12.667 58.90 14820 0.0000 49.400 61.80 32560 1.5980 110.13 56.10 4180 0.0000 13.933 59.00 15200 0.0000 50.667 61.90 33180 1.6580 112.26 56.20 4560 0.0000 15.200 59.10 15820 0.0772 52.811 62.00 33800 1.7155 114.38 56.30 4940 0.0000 16.467 59.20 16440 0.1092 54.909 62.10 34687 2.3867 118.01 56.40 5320 0.0000 17.733 59.30 17060 0.1338 57.000 62.20 35573 3.5663 122.14 56.50 5700 0.0000 19.000 59.40 17680 0.1545 59.088 62.30 36460 5.0762 126.61 56.60 6080 0.0000 20.267 59.50 18300 0.1727 61.173 62.40 37347 6.8533 131.34 56.70 6460 0.0000 21.533 59.60 18920 0.1892 63.256 62.50 38233 8.8608 136.31 56.80 6840 0.0000 22.800 59.70 19540 0.2043 65.338 62.60 39120 11.074 141.47 56.90 7220 0.0000 24.067 59.80 20160 0.2184 67.418 62.70 40007 13.475 146.83 57.00 7600 0.0000 25.333 59.90 20780 0.2317 69.498 62.80 40893 16.050 152.36 57.10 7980 0.0000 26.600 60.00 21400 0.2442 71.578 . 62.90 41780 16.509 155.78 57.20 8360 0.0000 27.867 60.10 22020 0.3935 73.793 63.00 42667 17.328 159.55 57.30 8740 0.0000 29.133 60.20 22640 0.4617 75.928 63.10 43553 18.109 163.29 57.40 9120 0.0000 30.400 60.30 23260 0.5163 78.050 63.20 44440 18.855 166.99 57.50 9500 0.0000 31.667 60.40 23880 0.5636 80.164 63.30 45327 19.573 170.66 57.60 9880 0.0000 32.933 60.50 24500 0.6061 82.273 63.40 46213 20.264 174.31 57.70 10260 0.0000 34.200 ,. 25120 0.6453 84.379 57.80 10640 0.0000 35.467 60.'/0 25740 0.6817 86.482 11/18/92 Dodds Engineers, Incorpoaced page 27 • THE BLUFFS - PRELIMINARY DETENTION ANALYSIS Prepared By: Roy E. Lewis, Jr. , P.E. LEVEL POOL ROUTING TABLE 100-YEAR ROUTING MATCH Q (cfs) 3.38 INFLOW Q (cfs) : 5.43 PEAK STAGE (ft) : 61.48 PEAK OUTFLOW 1 . 38 PEAK TIME: 650.. 00 min. INFLOW HYD No. : 6 OUTFLOW HYD No. : 9 LEVEL POOL ROUTING TABLE I1 12 2S1 SUM 01 02+2S2 STAGE TIME < cfs min > (ft) (min) 0 . 0000 0 . 0011 0 . 0000 0 . 0011 0 . 0000 0 . 0011 55. 00 30 . 00, 0 . 0011 0 . 0144 0. 0011 0 . 0167 0 . 0000 0 . 0167 55. 00 40 . 00 0 . 0144 0 . 0439 0 .0167 0 . 0750 0. 0000 0 . 0750 55. 00 50 . 00 0 . 0439 0. 0787 0. 0750 0 . 1976 0 .0000 0 . 1976 55. 01 60 . 00 0 . 0787 0 . 1120 0. 1976 0 .3883 0 . 0000 0 .3883 55. 02 70 . 00 0 . 1120 0 . 1417 0 .3883 0 . 6420 0 .0000 0 . 6420 55. 03 80 . 00 0 . 1417 0 .1674 0 . 6420 0 . 9511 0 . 0000 0 . 9511 55. 05 90 . 00 0 . 1674 0 .1894 0. 9511 1 .3079 0 . 0000 1 .3079 55 . 08 100 . 00 0 . 1894 0 .2250 1 .3079 1.7223 0 . 0000 1 .7223 55. 10 110 . 00 0 .2250 0 .2671 1.7223 2.2144 0 . 0000 2 .2144 55 . 14 120 . 00 0 .2671 0 .2960 2.2144 2.7775 0 . 0000 2 .7775 55 . 17 130 . 00 0 .2960 0 .3175 2.7775 3.3909 0 . 0000 3.3909 55.22 140 . 00 0 .3175 .0 .3344 3.3909 4. 0428 0 . 0000 4 . 0428 55.27 150 . 00 0 .3344 0 .3483 4.0428 4.7255 0 . 0000 4 .7255 55.32 160 . 00 0 .3483 0 .3810 4.7255 5.4548 0 . 0000 5 . 4548 55 .37 170 . 00 0 .3810 0.4224 5.4548 6.2582 0.0000 6.2582 55. 43 180 . 00 0 . 4224 0 .4467 6.2582 7 . 1273 0 .0000 7 . 1273 55. 49 190 . 00 0 . 4467 0 .4626 7 . 1273 8 . 0366 0 . 0000 8 . 0366 55.56 200 . 00 0 . 4626 0 .4741 8 . 0366 8 . 9734 0 . 0000 8 . 9734 55. 63 210 . 00 0 .4741 0 .4831 8 . 9734 9. 9306 0 . 0000 9. 9306 55.71 220 . 00 0 . 4831 0 .5138 9. 9306 10 . 927 0 . 0000 10 . 927 55.78 230 . 00 0 .5138 0 .5567 10 . 927 11. 998 0 . 0000 11 . 998 55. 86 240 . 00 0 .5567 0.5862 11 . 998 13. 141 0 . 0000 13. 141 55 . 95 250 . 00 0 .5862 0 . 6110 13. 141 14.338 0 . 0000 14 . 338 56. 04 260 . 00 0 . 6110 0 . 6331 14 .338 . 15.582 0 . 000.0 15.582 56. 13 270 . 00 - 0 . 6331 0 . 6533 15.582 16. 869 0 . 0000 16. 869 56.23 280 . 00 0 . 6533 0 .7057 2 869 18 .228 0 . 0000 18 .228 56. 33 290 . 00 0 . 7057 0 .7737 1 228 19.707 0 .0000 19.707 56. 44 300 . 00 0 . 7737 0 . 8160 19. 707 21 .297 0 . 0000 21 .297 56.56 310 . 00 0 . 8160 0 . 8462 21 .297 22 . 959- 0 . 0000 22 . 959 56. 68 320 . 00 0 . 8462 0 . 8705 22 . 959 24 . 676 0 . 0000 24 . 676 56. 81 330 . 00 0 . 8705 0 . 8916 24 . 676 26.438 0 . 0000 26. 438 56. 95 340 . 00 0 . 8916 0 . 9524 26.438 28 .282 0 . 0000 28 .282 57 . 09 350 . 00 0 . 9524 1 . 0319 28.282 30 .266 0 . 0000 30 .266 57 .23 360 . 00 1 . 0319 1 . 0792 30 .266 32 .377 0 . 0000 32 . 377 57 .39 370 . 00 1 . 0792 1 . 1114 • 32 .377 34 .568 0 . 0000 34 .568 57 .56 380 . 00 1 . 1114 1 . 1365 34 .568 36. 816 0 . 0000 36. 816 57 .73 390 . 00 - 1 . 1365 1 . 1578 36. 816 39.110 0 . 0000 39. 110 57 . 91 400 . 00 1 . 1578 1 .3154 39. 110 41 .583 0 . 0000 41 .583 58 . 09 410 . 00 1 .3154 1 .5373 41.583 44 .436 0 . 0000 44 . 436 58 .28 420 . 00 1 .5373 1 . 6532 44 .436 47 . 626 0 . 0000 47 . 626 58 .51 430 . 00 11/18/92 Dodds Engineers, Incorpo' '":ed page 28 THL LLUFFS - PRELIMINARY DETEN"'c:LJN ANALYSIS • Prepared By: Roy E. Lewis, Jr. , P.E. LEVEL POOL ROUTING TABLE LEVEL. POOL ROUTING TABLE I1 I2 2S1 SUM 01 02+2S2 STAGE TIME < cfs min "> (ft) (min) 1 . 6532 1 . 8932 47 . 626 51. 173 0 . 0000 51 . 173 58 .76 440 . 00 1 . 8932 2 . 1931 51. 154 55.241 0. 0182 55.223 59. 02 450 . 00 2 . 1931 2 . 9785 55. 110 60.281 0 .1129 60 . 168 59.21 460 . 00 2 . 9785 4 . 8196 60 .004 67. 803 0.1639 67 . 639 59. 45 470 . 00 4 . 8196 5.4341 67 .419 77. 672 0.2199 77 . 453 59. 81 480 . 00 5. 4341 4 .2876 76. 952 86. 673 0 .5009 86. 172 60 .27 490 . 00 4 .2876 3.2273 85 .496 93. 011 0 . 6764 92 .335 60 . 69 500 . 00 3.2273 2 .5718 91 .562 97.361 0 . 7730 96.588 60 . 98 510 . 00 2 .5718 2 .2881 95.483 100 .34 1 . 1043 99.239 61 . 17 520 . 00 2 .2881 1 . 9705 98 . 011 102 .27 , 1 .2283 101 . 04 61 .29 530 . 00 1 . 9705 1 . 6356 99.741 103.35 1 .2998 102 . 05 61 .37 540 . 00 1 . 6356 1.4897 100 .71 103. 84 1 .3376 102 .50 61 .42 550 . 00 1 .4897 1 .4278 101 . 14 104 . 06 1.3536 102.71 61 . 44 560 . 00 1 .4278 1.4030 101 .35 104 . 18 1 .3611 102 . 82 61 . 45 570 . 00 1 .4030 1 .3947 101 .45 104.25 1 .365.0 102 . 88 61 . 46 580 . 00 1 .3947 1 .3937 101.52 104 .30 1 .3674 102 . 94 61 . 46 590 . 00 1 .3937 1 . 3958 101.57 104 .36 1 .3693 102 . 99 61 .46 600 . 00 1 . 3958 1 .3992 101. 62 104 .41 1.3712 103. 04 61 .47 610 . 00 1 .3992 1.4032 101 . 67 104 .47 1 .3730 103 . 10 61 .47 620 . 00 1 .4032 1.4073 -101 .72 104 .53 1 .3751 103. 16 61 .47 630 . 00 1 . 4073 1.4115 101 .78 104 . 60, 1 .3772 103.22 61 . 47 640 . 00 1 . 4115 1 . 3438 101 . 84 104 . 60 1 .3795 103 .22 61 . 48 650 . 00 1 . 3438 1 .2437 101. 84 104 .43 1 .3794 103. 05 61 . 48 660 . 00 1 .2437 1 .2006 101. 67 104 . 12 1 .3733 102 . 75 61 . 47 670 . 00 1 .2006 1 . 1829 101 .38 103.77 1 .3625 102 .40 61 .45 680 . 00 1 . 1829 1 . 1764 101. 05 103.41 1 .3503 102 . 06 61 . 44 690 . 00 1 . 1764 1 . 1749 100 .72 103 . 08 1 .3381 _ 101 .74 61 .42 700 . 00 1 . 1749 1. 1755 100 .41 102 .76 1 .3265 101 .43 61 .41 710 . 00 1 . 1755 1. 1771 100 . 12 102 .47 1 .3152 101 . 16 61 .39 720 . 00 1 . 1771 1. 1791 99. 853 102 .21 1 .3043 100 . 90 61 .38 730 . 00 1 . 1791 1. 1813 99. 610 101 . 97 1.2945 100 . 68 61 .37 740 . 00 1 . 1813 1 . 1835 99.391 101 .76 1.2855 100 .47 61 .36 750 . 00 1 . 1835 1 .1856 99. 192 101 .56 1 .2774 100 .28 61 .35 760 . 00 1 . 1856 1 . 11.89 99. 014 101 .32 1 .2702 100 . 05 61 .34 770 .00 1 . 1189 1 .0212 98.787 100 . 93 1 .2610 99. 666 61 .33 780 . 00 1 . 0212 0 . 9785 98 .420 100 . 42 1 .2460 99. 174 61 .31 790 . 00 0 . 9785 0 . 9602 97 . 949 99. 887 1 .2254 98 . 662 61 .29 800 . 00 0 . 9602. 0 . 9528 97 .459 , 99.372 1 .2027 98 . 169 61 .26 810 . 00 0 . 9528 0 . 9502 96. 988 98. 891 1 . 1809 97 .711 61 .24 820 . 00 0 . 9502 0 . 9497 96.550 98.450 1 . 1606 97 .289 61 .22 830 . 00 0 . 9497 . 0 . 9501 96. 147 98.047 1 . 1419 96. 905 61 .20 840 . 00 0 . 9501 0 . 9510 95.784 97. 685 1 . 1214 96.563. 61 . 18 850 . 00 0 . 9510 0 . 9520 95.460. 97.3.63 1 . 1030 96.260 61 . 17 860 . 00 0 . 9520 0 . 9531 95 . 174 97. 079 1 . 0867 95 . 992 61 . 15 870 . 00 0 . 9531 0 . 9542 94 . 920 96. 827 1 . 0723 95. 755 61 . 14 880 . 00 0 . 9542 0 . 9227 94 . 695 96.572 1 . 0596 95.512 61 . 13 890 . 00 0 . 9227 0 . 8766 94.466 96.265 1 . 0465 95.219 61 . 12 900 . 00 • 11/18/92 Dodds Engineers, Incorpo ,:ed page 29 THL- �;LUFFS - PRELIMINARY DETENI;.JN ANALYSIS Prepared By: Roy E. Lewis, Jr. , P.E. LEVEL POOL ROUTING TABLE LEVEL POOL ROUTING TABLE I1 I2 2S1 SUM 01 02+2S2 STAGE TIME < cfs min > (ft) (min) 0 . 8766 0 . 8565 94. 188 95. 921 1 . 0307 94 . 890 61 . 11 910 . 00 0 . 8565 0. 8481 93. 888 95.592 1 . 0027 94 .590 61 . 09 920 . 00 0 . 8481 0 . 8448 93. 619 95.312 0 . 9709 94 . 341 61 . 08 930 . 00 0 . 8448 0. 8438 93.396 95. 085 0 . 9446 94. 140 61 . 07 940 . 00 0 . 8438 0 . 8438 93.217 94 . 904 0 . 9234 93. 981 61 . 06 950 . 00 0 . 8438 0 . 8442 93. 074 94.762 0 . 9065 93. 856 61 . 05 960 . 00 0 . 8442 0 . 8448 92 . 962 94. 651 0 . 8933 93. 758 61 . 05 970 . 00 0 . 8448 0 .8455 92 . 875 ' 94.565 0 . 8830 93 . 682 61 . 04 980 . 00 0 . 8455 0 . 8463 92 . 807 94 .499 0 . 8750 93 . 624 61 . 04 990 . 00 0 . 8463 0.8470 92 .755 94 .448 0 .8688 93 .580 61 .04 1000 . 00 0 . 8470 0.8006 92.715 94 .363 0 . 8641 93 . 499 61 . 03 1010 . 00 0 . 8006 0 .7331 92 . 643 94 . 177 0 . 8556 93. 321 61 . 03 1020 . 00 0 .7331 0.7034 92 .484 93. 921 0. 8369 93. 084 61 . 02 1030 . 00 0 .7034 0 . 6904 92 .272 93. 666 0 . 8118 92 . 854 61 . 01 1040 . 00 0 . 6904 0 . 6849 92 . 067 93.442 0 .7875 92 . 655 61 . 00 1050 . 00 0 . 6849 0 . 6827 91 .877 93.245 0 .7777 92 .467 60 . 99 1060 . 00 0 . 6827 0 . 6820 91. 692 93. 057 0 .7750 92 .282 60 . 99 1070 . 00 0 . 6820 0. 6819 91.509 92. 873 0.7722 92 . 101 60 . 98 1080 . 00 0 . 6819 0 . 6821 91.332 92. 696 0 .7696 91 . 926 60 . 97 1090 . 00 ; 0 . 6821 0 . 6825 91. 159 92.524 0 .7670 91 .757 60 . 96 1100 . 00 0 . 6825 0 . 6829 90 . 992 92.358 0 .7645 91 .593 60 . 95 1110 . 00 0 . 6829 0 . 6833 90 .831 92 .197 0 .7620 91 .435 60 . 94 1120 . 00 0 . 6833 0 . 6837 90 . 676 92 . 042 0 .7597 91 .283 60 . 94 1130 . 00 0 . 6837 0 . 6841 90 .525 91 . 893 0 .7575 91 . 136 60 . 93 1140 . 00 0 . 6841 0 . 6845 90 .380 91 .749 0 .7553 90 . 994 60 . 92 1150 . 00 0 . 6845 0 . 6849 90 .241 91 . 610 0 .7532 90 . 857 60 . 91 1160 . 00 0 . 6849 0 . 6853 90.106 91 .476 0 .7512 , 90 .725 60 . 91 1170 . 00 0 . 6853 0. 6858 ' 89. 976 91 .347 0 .7492 90 .598 60 . 90 1180 . 00 0 . 6858 0 . 6862 89. 850 91.222 0 .7473 90 . 475 60 . 90 1190 . 00 0 . 6862 0 . 6866 89.730 91 . 102 0 .7454 90 .357 60 . 89 1200 . 00 0 . 6866 0 . 6870 89. 613 90 . 987 0 .7435 90 .243 60. 88 1210 . 00 0 . 6870 0 . 6873 89.502 90 . 876 0 .7418 90 . 134 60 . 88 1220 . 00 0 . 6873 0 . 6877 89.394 90 .769 0.7401 90 . 029 60 . 87 1230 . 00 0 . 6877 0 . 6881 89.291 90 . 667 0 .7384 89. 928 60 . 87 1240 .00 0 . 6881 0. 6885 89. 191 90 .568 0 .7369 89. 831 60 . 86 1250 . 00 0 . 6885 0. 6889 89. 096 90 .473 0.7354 89. 738 60 . 86 1260 . 00 0 . 6889 0. 6893 89. 004 90 .382 0 . 7339 89. 648 60 . 86 1270 . 00 0 . 6893 0 . 6896 88 . 915 90.294 0 .7325 89.562 60 . 85 1280 . 00 0 . 6896 0 . 6900 88 . 831 90 .210 . 0 .7312 89. 479 60 . 85 1290 . 00 0 . 6900 0. 6904 _ 8 .749 90 . 129 0 .7299 89. 399 60 . 84 1300 . 00 0 . 6904 0 . 6907 88 . 671 90. 052 0 .7287 89. 323 60 . 84 1310 . 00 0 . 6907 0. 6911 88 .596 89. 978 0 .7275 89.250 60 . 84 1320 .00 0 . 6911 0 . 6915 88 .524. 89. 906 0 .7264 89. 180 60 . 83 1330 . 00 0 . 6915 0 . 6918 88 .455 89. 838 0 .7253 89. 113 60 . 83 1340 . 00 0 . 6918 0 . 6922 88 .388 ' 89.772 0 .7242 89. 048 60 . 83 1350 . 00 0 . 6922 0 . 6925 88 .325 89.709 0 .7232 88 . 986 60 . 82 1360 . 00 0 . 6925, 0 . 6928 88 .264 89. 649 0 .7223 88 . 927 60 . 82 1370 . 00 11/18/92 Dodds Engineers, Incorpo' .ed page 30 THE . :DUFFS - PRELIMINARY DETEN':_t ►N ANALYSIS Prepared By: Roy E. Lewis, Jr. , P .E. LEVEL POOL ROUTING TABLE LEVEL POOL ROUTING TABLE I1 I2 2S1 SUM 01 02+2S2 STAGE TIME cfs min > (ft) (min) 0 . 6928 0 . 6932 88 .20.6 89.592 0 .7214 88 . 870 60 . 82 1380 . 00 0 . 6932 0 . 6935 88 . 150 89.537 0 .7205 88 . 816 60 . 81 1390 .00 0 . 6935 0 . 6939 88 . 096 89.484 0 .7196 88 .764 60 . 81 1400 . 00 0 . 6939 0 . 6942 88. 045 89.433 0 .7188 88 .715 60 . 81 1410 . 00 0 . 6942 0 . 6945 87 . 996 89.385 0 .7181 88 . 667 60 . 81 1420 . 00 0 . 6945 0 . 6949 87 . 950 89.339 0 .7173 88 . 622 60 . 80 1430 . 00 0 . 6949 0. 6952 87 . 905 89.295 0 .7166 88 .579 60 . 80 1440 . 00 0 . 6952 0 .5022 87 . 863 89. 060 0 .7160 88 .344 60 . 80 1450 . 00 0 .5022 0 .2232 87 . 632 88 .357 0 .7121 87 . 645 60 .79 1460 . 00 0 .2232 0 .0992 86. 944 87 .267 0.7007 86.566 60 .76 1470 . 00 0 . 0992 0 . 0441 85. 883 86. 026 0 . 6831 85.343 60 .70 1480 . 00 0 . 0441 0 . 0196 84 . 681 84 .745 0 . 6620 84 . 083 60 . 65 1490 .00 0 . 0196 0. 0087 83.443 83.472 0 . 6398 82 . 832 60 .59 1500 . 00 0 . 0087 0. 0039 82 .215 82.228 0 . 6165 81 . 611 60 .53 1510 . 00 0 . 0039 0 . 0017 81 . 018 81 .024 0 .5928 80 .431 60 .47 1520 . 00 0 . 0017 0 . 0008 79. 862 79. 865 0 .5690 79.296 60 .41 1530 . 00 0 . 0008 0 . 0003 78 .752 78 .753 0 .5442 78 .209 60 .36 1540 . 00 0 . 0003 0 .0002 77. 689 77 . 689 0 .5198 77 . 169 60 .31 1550 . 00 0 . 0002 0 . 0001 76. 676 76. 676 0 .4936 76. 182 60 .26 1560 . 00 0 . 0001 0 . 0000 75.714 75.714 0.4683 75.246 60 .21 1570 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 74 .806 74 . 806 0.4399 74 .366 60 . 17 1580 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 73. 954 73. 954 0 .4118 73.543 60 . 13 1590 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 73. 166 73.166 0 .3766 72 .789 60 . 09 1600 .00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 72.464 72 .464 0 .3258 72 . 138 60 . 05 1610 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 71 . 856 71. 856 0 .2820 71 .574 60 . 03 1620 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 71.330 71 .330 0 .2442 71 . 085 60 . 00 1630. 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 70 . 844 70 . 844 0 .2413 70 . 603 59. 98 1640 .00 0 . 0000 -0 . 0000 70 .365 70 .365 0 .2384 70 . 126 59. 95 1650 .00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 69. 891 69. 891 0 .2355 69. 655 59. 93 1660 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 69.423 69.423 0 .2326 69. 190 59. 91 1670 . 00 0 . 0000 0 .0000 68. 960 68. 960 0 .2297 68 . 730 59. 89 1680 . 00 0 . 0000 0 .0000 68 .504 68.504 0 .2268 68 .277 59. 86 1690 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 68 . 053 68 . 053 0 .2239 67 . 829 59. 84 1700 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 000.0 67 . 608 67 . 608 0 .2211 67 . 387 59. 82 1710 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 67 . 169 67 . 169 0 .2182 66. 950 59. 80 1720 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 66.735 66.735 0 .2153 66.520 59.78 1730 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 . 66.308 .66.308 0 .2124. 66. 095 59.76 1740 . 00 0 . 0000 0 .0000 65. 886 65. 886 0 .2095 65 . 676 59.74 1750 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 65.470 65.470 0 .2066 65.263 59.72 1760 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 65. 059 65. 059 0 .2038 64 . 855 59.70 1770 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 64 . 655 64. 655 0 .2008 64 . 454 59. 68 1780 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 64.256 64.256 0 . 1979 64 . 058 ,.59. 66 1790 . 00 0 . 0000 0 .0000 63. 863 63. 863 0 .1950 63. 668 59. 64 1800 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 63.476 63. 476 0 . 1922 63.283 59. 62 1810 . 00 0 .,0000 0. 0000 63. 094 63. 094 0 . 1894 62 . 905 59. 60 1820 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 62 .718 62.718 0 . 1864 62 .532 59.58 1830 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 62.348 62.348 0 . 1835 62 . 165 59.57 1840 . 00 11/18/92 Dodds Engineers, Incorpo :ed page 31 THL ._LUFFS - PRELIMINARY DETEN-JN ANALYSIS Prepared By: Roy E. Lewis, Jr. , P.E. LEVEL POOL ROUTING TABLE LEVEL POOL ROUTING TABLE I1 I2, 2S1 SUM 01 02+2S2 STAGE TIME < cfs min > (ft) (min) 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 61 . 984 61. 984 0 . 1806 61 . 804 59.55 1850 . 00 0 . 0000 0. 0000 61 . 626 61. 626 0 . 1777 61 . 449 59.53 1860 . 00 0 . 0000 , 0 . 0000 61 .274 61.274 0 . 1749 61 . 099 59.51 1870 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 60 . 927 60. 927 0 . 1721 60 .755 59.50 1880 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 60 .586 60.586 0.1690 60 .417 59. 48 1890 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 60.250 60.250 0. 1661 60 . 084 59.46 1900 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 59. 921 59. 921 0 . 1632 59.758 59. 45 1910 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 59.598 59.598 0 . 1603 59. 437 59. 43" 1920 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 59.280 59.280 0 . 1575 59. 122 59.42 1930 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 58 . 968 58 . 968 0 . 1548 .58 . 813 59.40 1940 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 58 . 661 58. 661 0 . 1517 58 .509 59.39 1950 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 58 .361 58 .361 0 . 1487 58 .212 59.37 1960 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 58 . 066 58. 066 0 . 1458 57 . 920 59. 36 1970 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 ' 57 .777 57.777 0 .142.9 57 . 634 59.34 1980 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 57 .494 57.494 0 . 1401 57 .3.54 59. 33 1990 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 57 .217 57.217 0 . 1373 57 . 080 59.32 2000 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 56. 945 56. 945 0 . 1346 56. 811 59. 30 2010 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 56. 679 56. 679 0 . 1315 56.548 59.29 2020 . 00 0 . 0000 0 .0000 ' 56.419 56.419 0 .1285 56.291 59.28 2030 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 56. 165 56. 165 0.1254 56. 040 59.27 2040 . 00 0 . 0000 0 .0000 55. 917 55. 917 0 . 1225 55 . 795 59.25 2050 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 55. 675 55. 675 0 . 1196 55 .556 59.24 2060 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 55.439 55.439 0 . 1168 55. 322 59.23 2070 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 '55.208 55.208 0. 1141 55. 094 59.22 2080 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 54 . 982 54. 982 0.1114 54 . 871 59.21 2090. 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 54 .762 54.762 0 .1086 54 . 654 59.20 ' 2100 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 54 .548 54.548 0 . 1053 54 .443 59. 19 2110 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 54.341 54.341 0 . 1021 54 .239 59. 18 ' 2120 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 54. 140 54. 140 0 . 0990 54 . 041 59. 17 2130 .00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 53. 945 53. 945 0 . 0960 53. 849 59. 16 2140 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 53.756 53.756 0 . 0931 53. 663 59. 15 2150 .00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 53.573 53.573 0 . 0902 53.482 59. 14 2160 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 53.395 53.395 0 . 0875 53 .307 59. 13 2170. 00 0 . 0000 0 .0000 53.223 53.223 0 . 0848 53. 138 59. 12 2180 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 53. 056 53. 056 0 . 0822 52 . 973 59. 12 . 2190 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 52 . 894 52. 894 0 . 0797 52 . 814 59. 11 2200. 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 52 .737 52.737 0 . 0773 52 . 659 59. 10 2210 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 52.588 52.588 0 . 0718 52 .516 59. 09 2220 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 52.449 52.449 0 . 0666 52 .383 59. 09 2230 . 00 0 . 0000 '0 . 0000 52 .321 52.321 0 . 0618 52 .259 59. 08 2240 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 52 .202 . 52.202 0 . 0574 52 . 144 59. 07 2250 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 52. 091 52. 091 0 . 0532 52 . 038 59. 07 2260 . 00 0 . 0000 0 .0000 51 . 988 51. 988 0 . 0494 51 . 939 59. 06 2270 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 51. 893 51. 893 0 .0458 51 . 847 59. 06 2280 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 51 . 805 51. 805 0 . 0425 51 .762 59. 06 2290 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 51 .723 51.723 0 . 0395 . 51 . 683 59. 05 2300 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 51. 647 51. 647 0 . 0366 51 . 610 59. 05 2310 . 00 11/18/92 Dodds Engineers, Incorpo;'� =,ed page 32 THE 21JUFFS - PRELIMINARY DETEN: ,JN ANALYSIS Prepared By: Roy E. Lewis, Jr. , P.E. LEVEL POOL ROUTING TABLE LEVEL POOL ROUTING TABLE I1 I2 2S1 SUM 01 02+2S2 STAGE TIME < cfs min > (ft) (min) 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 51.576 51 .576 0 . 0340 51 .542 59. 04 2320 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 51.511 51.511 0 . 0315 51 .479 59. 04 2330 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 51 .450 51 .450 . 0 . 0293 51 . 420 59. 04 2340 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 51.393 51.393 0 . 0272 51 .366 59. 04 2350 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 51 .341 51.341 0 . 0252 51 .316 59. 03 2360 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 51.292 51 .292 0. 0234 51 .269 59. 03 2370 . 00 0 . 0000 0 .0000 51.247 51 .247 0. 0217 51 .226 59. 03 2380 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 51.205 51.205 0 . 0201 51 . 185 59. 03 2390 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 51. 167 51.167 0 . 0187 51 . 148 59.02 2400 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 51. 131 51 .131 0 . 0173 51 . 113 59. 02 2410 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 51. 097 51 . 097 0. 0161 51 . 081 59. 02 2420 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 51.066 51 . 066 0. 0149 51 . 051 59. 02 2430 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 51.037 51 . 037 0. 0139 51 . 024 59. 02 2440 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 51. 011 51. 011 0. 0129 50 . 998 59. 02 2450 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 00'00 50. 986 50. 986 0 . 0119 50 . 974 59. 02 2460 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 . 50. 963 50. 963 0 .0111 50 . 952 59. 01 2470 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 50. 942 50. 942 0 . 0103 50 . 931 59. 01 2480 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 50 . 922 50. 922 0 . 0095 50 . 912 59. 01 2490 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 50 . 903 50. 903 0 . 0088. 50 . 895 59 . 01 2500 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 50 . 886 50. 886 0. 0082 50 . 878 59. 01 2510 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 50 . 870 50.870 0 . 0076 50 . 863 59. 01 2520. 00 0 . 0000 0. 0000 50 . 856 50.856 0 . 0071 50 . 849 59. 01 2530 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 50. 842 50. 842 0 . 0066 50 . 836 59. 01 2540 . 00 0 . 0000 0 .0000 50 . 830 50. 830 0 . 0061 50 . 823 59. 01 2550 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 50 . 818 50. 818 0 . 0056 50 . 812 59. 01 2560 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 50 . 807 50. 807 0 . 0052 50 . 802 59. 01 2570 . 00 - 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 50 .797 50.797 0.0049 50 . 792 59. 01 2580 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 50.787 50.787 0. 0045 50 . 783 59. 01 2590 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 50 .779 50.779 0 . 0042 50 . 775 59. 01 2600 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 50 .771 50.771 0 . 0039 50 . 767 59. 01 2610 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 50 .763 50.763 0. 0036 50 .760 59. 00 2620 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 50 .756 50.756 0. 0033 50 .753 59. 00 2630 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 50 .750 50.750 0 . 0031 50 .747 59. 00 2640 . 00 0 . 0000 0. 0000 50 .744 50 .744 0 . 0029 50 .741 59. 00 2650 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 50 .738 50.738 0 . 0027 50 .736 59. 00 2660. 00 0 . 0000 0. 0000 50 .733 50.733 0. 0025 50 .731 59. 00 2670 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 50 .728 50.728 0 . 0023 50 .726 59. 00 2680 . 00 0 . 0000 0 .0000 50.724 50.724 0.0021 50 .722 59. 00 2690 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 50 .720 50.720 0 . 0020 50 .718 59. 00 2700 . 00 0 . 0000 0. 0000 50 .716 50.716 0 . 0018 50 .714 59. 00 2710 . 00 0 . 0000 0. 0000 50 .712 50.712 0 . 001.7 50 .711 59. 00 2720 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 50 .709 50.709 0 . 0016 . 50 .707 59. 00 2730 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 50 .706 50 .706 0 . 0015 50 .705 59. 00 2740 . 00 0 . 0000 0 .0000 50 .703 50.703 0 . 0014 50 .702 59. 00 2750 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 50.701 50.701 0 . 0013 50 . 699 59. 00 2760 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 50 . 698 50. 698 0 . 0012 50 . 697 59. 00 2770 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 50. 696 50. 696 0 . 0011 50 . 695 59. 00 2780 . 00 11/18/92 Dodds Engineers, Incorpo: ed page 33 THE =..,.:,UFFS - PRELIMINARY DETEN....-.,N ANALYSIS Prepared By: Roy E. Lewis, Jr. , P .E. LEVEL POOL ROUTING TABLE LEVEL POOL ROUTING TABLE I1 I2 2S1 SUM 01 02+2S2 STAGE TIME < cfs min > (ft) (min) 0 . 0000 0.0000 50 . 694 50.694 0 . 0010 . 50 . 693 59. 00 2790 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 50 . 692 50.692 0 . 0009 50 . 691 59. 00. 2800 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 50 . 690 50. 690 0 . 0009 50 . 689 59. 00 2810 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 50 . 688 50. 688 0 . 0008 50 . 687 59. 00 2820 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 50. 687 50. 687 0 . 0007 50 . 686 59. 00 2830 . 00 0 . 0000 0 .0000 50. 685 50.685 0 . 0007 50 . 685 59. 00 2840 . 00 0 . 0000 0 .0000 50 . 684 50 . 684 0 . 0006 50 . 683 59. 00 2850 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0.000 50. 683 50 . 683 0 . 0006 50 . 682 59. 00 2860 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 50. 682 50 . 682 0 . 0006 50 . 681 59. 00 2870 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 50 . 680 50 . 680 0 . 0005 50 . 680 59. 00 2880 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 50 . 679 50 . 679 0. 0005 50. 679 59. 00 2890 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 50 . 679 50. 679 0 .0004 50 . 678 59. 00 2900 . 00 0;. 0000 0 . 0000 50 . 678 50. 678 0 . 0004 50 . 677 59. 00 2910 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 50. 677 50 . 677 0 . 0004 50 . 677 59. 00 2920 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 50. 676 50 . 676 0 . 0004 50 . 676 59. 00 2930 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 50. 675 50 . 675 0 . 0003 50 . 675 59. 00 2940 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 50 . 675 50 . 675 0 . 0003 50 . 675 59. 00 2950 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 50. 674 50 . 674 0 .0003 50 . 674 59. 00 2960 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 50. 674 50 . 674 0 . 0003 50 . 673 59. 00 2970 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 50. 673 50 . 673 0 . 0002 50 . 673 59. 00 2980 . 00 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 50 . 673 50 . 673 0 . 0002 50 . 673 59. 00 2990 . 00 0 . 0000 0. 0000 50. 672 50 . 672 0. 0002 50 . 672 59. 00 3000 .00 DODDS ENGINEERS, INC. CIVIL ENGINEERING SURVEYING PLANNING CIVIL ENGINEERING INPUT INTO THE REZONE APPLICATION FOR: • "THE BLUFFS" RENTON, WASHINGTON PINING DIVISION CITY OF REPITON N®� 191992 RECEN 4 Prepared By: Roy E. Lewis, Jr., P.E. • /r , DEI Project No. 88139 / 1994 477 November 17, 1992 ss/orvALE�' EXPIRE/(/ /.:,I //Z92 4205 14BTH AVE. N.E., SUITE 200-BELLEVUE, WA 98007 [206] 885-7877 OR 454-3743 FAX:[206]BB5-7963 TABLE OF CONTENTS BOUNDARY & TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY EXHIBIT LAND USE MAP SLOPE ANALYSIS WATER SUPPLY NARRATIVE PAGES 1 - 2 POPULATION ESTIMATE AND WATER DEMAND TABLES WATER SYSTEM EXHIBIT SANITARY SEWER NARRATIVE PAGE 3 SANITARY SEWER EXHIBIT SANITARY SEWER ANALYSIS (RH2 ENGINEERING) STORM DRAINAGE NARRATIVE PAGES 4 - 7 ESTIMATION OF SITE DISTURBANCE TABLE 24-HOUR STORM RUNOFF ESTIMATES TABLE COMPARISON OF DEVELOPED RAINFALL RUNOFF TABLE DRAINAGE BASIN MAP STORM DRAINAGE EXHIBIT DOWNSTREAM STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEM EXHIBIT A NOTE TO THE READERS: This document, its narrative and exhibits, was originally prepared for the Environmental Impact Statement for The Bluffs. Some of the narrative has been updated to reflect the Rezone proposal currently under review. Many of the exhibits, however, still portray an older version of the proposed site plan. The differences between then and now, however, are not significant; tabular values and the narrative are still applicable. • \ I I . . \ . ; • • • t i . - . (- , 2)v)..) i'..\• i: \ .').1 - ' - • . \!, y !!' Iii ., •• ��� �� ( \ • ' , : LL \I. . — ,; { II i; \ ,,.,______,..,„_._is.,„\‘,„ • L 11,01 '''!7c. -. ‘T\k'::\'''''''' \ \ .‘, : . \ \ , 1 4 , 4 . .i; • . \ ' • . i II 1 : ;\ 1 F ' 1 1:4 . \ \ .' • ..'• • %1 1 . \\ V .--------- ----. , . .--) I \ • ...------ / ;AI_ cy-/j%,...- --:.. -4,;,//./;.?' f.',:.,.I\ 1,ca; li \ \ • \ \ , ± -ill'77 r ///.////,1 ;•. -. 6._.! • m mm . \ \N ,i1 ; ,• 1 \ �. 0 � x J(/7J/?/J4 ///f /I ill lI��X • cc— z t\c \ I ' i '(' 'ill'' /-•1I I !1 + 7 .• '-' \ ' . k../ " L ..1 z \\‘\ \\�(72. ..... �� o ��� � \ �" 1 • ) '� ;j; I 1 /-/' )1\ � \ 'i0-� \ _ mot.•. I m _ ��r.�1�/� Ir��� : ,: r m z•, f (---/- % Il l II/4/ 17 ' -,,,. 11108011 ,,---- :,-- lii� ti-z. .. S\ • .' o 711 y11.0 ....ji, . . , • •/.i _. -:%::-.----.•- *Bm.---,-. 1\ !\ . o'':� '1;�, �i ./ 1 1\\ :.,' Iti �' iImo- I . \ \ \ \ , ,, ,, . -• :. .. . 1 ;r•,,, 1 • t\A% \k \,ii ' 'I ;,\,:!!...\:,._k.''''.‘/.... ...,. ..-,. -..?", ,)-.‘i \.:\.....,;)\,•1 11, :.'1. 'i, 1 'I.i _\1 •. ' \ \\ \\', . . . . . f.., .... ,. . \i }} \ \ i ( ( ,. ,\ .,\ \\\,,\.\\\t . (. + 'i. ' ,1 ` ( II 't�\' \ �� III 1 ' " (\ ' ' :‘—) , \ l\ . ,.\ ilkI t \ I ...\ •% l 1:( . \ ...,. ‘...:,,...\\,. ... -,,is , • k ,, ... ,., \\,. .--...,..., \\\,\...‘.,\,_ ,/lic„ • • • A' ,. l ..• - •• ••-• ', •-•''''--. 1 1 ' • y...En zi 0 \\ " • 1 •( L..le, :,..-- •NN 'N. `:''''''' y I \ . ''''......-- , 1-:-.•\ 1 [rf to G V _ == CI'2 XI\..., Z \0 % ..1 I4 0 4.-:=7-6 oriZ %‘. ' 1 ,...13 4'0 P:1 i . .Cir13 . . \, • - ..'" •' '• a'OC/ ': 'g — (f) .00).______7:-7-.:.f(:__::- N,•• I ..-11 \ . iP )n" r w 8 - !Jp �,� \ a �rii • • I ) ` r L_� It` N DATE AUGUST 19tl9 No REVISIONS 1 or.TE pUD I BOUNDARY 8 TOPOGRAPH/C SURVEY DODDS ENGINEERS , INC, -• '-c�tEw+i''+, . ., m DESIGNED It.•Llslt'7S CIVIL ENGINEERING SURVEYING PLANNING je4P,da...,-J9'1r. c 1 -i DRAWN It.1-EWIS THE BLUFFS _ 4205-1413TH AVE.NE.-SUITE 2D0 ( ,/ r ''[ IC.I.I:WIS %C l(�f� G APPROVED BELLEVUE.WASHINGTON 9BD07 •,.. ,, `,�� --------•- - ------- m i ILUY E.LEWIS,Jlt.,l'.li v, f'..•.. �� m 12061 BB5-7977 OR 454-3743 \' —--- PROJECTMANAGER RENTON �VASHINGTON ......-- `� • a • • • r— — APPROX/MATE BOUNDARY (TYP.J -�_- _ i • INTERSTATE 405 ' - - _ �y--- __= = ,w,; , • -- ---- �;,. �" ::1.: n • Q■ ■ire■` , D J ��1 ■ ■ ■■ _ _ s • .r •, r r i _i ■ J 1'^'fit=:'�• ■ ■ ■ ■ J ir ■ n F.pi... - �-`=-tea ,.:r• _/ ��� • T \� ■r z - �e t - a 0 IL F- z — a D�' - > a :ram:; :� :: fix) .,t l { m • W may. i� It ..l..n. .... ... ...r. r _ ... .. .. ... .. ... .... --..-.• --= _. tie' /.. W m f .J Iw -__. Vim. :: . �— — _ J N O _ z - Z ¢ z - — - W • - _ II,.I.I JII::::,•II'//I:II':I�:IIIIIII//II IJIIamIN.I.I II IIIJIIII I III IIIiI �.' .�. •.• ...S.'.,-. .-. :...:-:.. .. ••. :::.::_•'�:.'..�•:%:ti�.:.`:�`::..:.:�.�--�.-�__— :. _ NI 2:': ;fir:.,r..:- ._..... <.. . y:. :. Wit . C Ot. , ,.--. �:"? ._.-.:.:.::. ....�_...--....,% .._.//.II //I IIII/I IIII IIIII II/INIII//IIIIIII,17NI//i_.� .: ._....-•.:..._....:.::. �,•'. ..':.::i:.�.:_,....-,.....r. .....,- . ':" : .: :. :� - �._ _+.:tiV:•::'_'="' � / -•;;;;;.,....•.•:1.*:J'✓..I '/JII/III"/III/I1I/J,I/I/I♦IIIII/IIII/I,I/II//II/JI,/IIIII I//I/III IIIIlIIIJIII/I IIIIIIIII/I III III IIII/I II/I III II NIHI II IIJ,I,,I IIII,I III III/ I .I.I.::N.�:II-�. -.'. s-:.-. t.::.. :^ :�'. _- ...:.. : ::..: :. �� ;:•`:'• '�:: �- `:- - ,..- . ._...--_. ,.IIII IIIIII IIII N/♦iIIII,I/IIIIIII/IIIIII.IIIII,IIII/IIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIN/IIIIIIIII._II.I-i, .. .. .;.•,.:.•:..t:: :•:.:.. .._;.... 0�.'; ...; E--- .. . ,/ N //H //, / /I ,III JhII ,INI /// ,INNI/III ,//II/II ._.�._, .:::.._.'..I ..:- -�_•.... ,.,'t:(- . . . , �_ -> - • -APPROXIMATE BOUNOARY• . .♦./I// /I/S//I II IIH . •JIIIII III II ,/•!I II/ IIIII /IIIII ♦ I I IIII /I/II /IIINIII : / ..I I/I IIIIN III I /II,I/ I/♦♦/ //III///I/IIJ/I/,•I II/IJ/IIIIIIIII I/I/IIIII♦IIININIIINIIIIIII//IIII,I/IIIHII N♦I♦IIIN I II J/IIIIIII. - • - - �c0z- „ „ N ♦,,I „ /III/.IIII IIN/.III l:::.::�. r•%L: t•'� • i• F/.„II//IJ„NIIII,I ,,II♦II / II ✓/,II/NIJ..I,III/,,J IIIIINIIII$IIIIIINININ/I IIII / II SsI"IJI,I�/IIIM. �� ::�'� : :i...^ -- : -pyN•/'I.,' i//II I,„ I/II I I „I.III// I I/� ,I I, ,J IIIII ✓I.I♦ . II N,IN HI„ NINI/ I N♦I //I/eI y ..Nf- +N♦•,�/`t-•'�-'`P�;'r• - ~;�-5:�::':t?•▪^'-� - _ _ .8V�f`��L� 5 IIIII/IIIIII/II/IIII/J,II/IIIIIII IIIIIIJ/JII/..I%IIIIlI,fI,:N/ ,IIII�III/IIIII IIINIIII�I„,I„/III,I,,III,III,IN,.IIIIN,,,,II,/„/„- : : _ ` S� �- • .. z AILRp "am:♦:/„:/jiI„/,:/I%,%,,�,I:Ij:IsII:„„:,:I/�sI/:Ij:l/l::,,,,i//+♦IIj:IIiI//:♦II:„II.II:iI♦II/IIs:IiI:N,I:.I:i,Nsi♦I/�;�::ijs//I/Ii:,I:I,i,i/i„I„iiii/l�,I�If/I�I�ii,l/NIl/,/IiI,„♦/Ii♦:J/►I♦�iiI/iI/i,„�/����Iiii„i-♦ii♦�iIiIii,i/�IN~�IiN,JNIII�I♦iJIi„IiI�/��NiI/IIIN�iiiII♦I,�1IiIi/JiiIi,'i/JIi�Ii±IiiII/IIiI/Ili• .-;::.;:::.::' t-•A:K EEN r �R 0 <�:oIIII::IIII, ,r/„//,i.iN, _. ,/b!•: /J.... IJ.�N ..� ..:ti..�/ N,JHN, Ni%���lliHjiiN ,II� I,,i: III�Ii III/IIiiIIIjiIIIil�ililiil,�iIII,,III�IIN IIiil I„♦♦�! _ <• -/II,iIIII Ii /II/ lj ll � III , /IINNNII/NI,♦,NIN,♦/,/HII,/N„N,,,IIIIIIJJJ • ,„♦/,,II/IIIIII,I//,I//„,II,/ NVNI�/�/ 'IIIIIIIIIII/„/,/N,,,,,,,,,,i�t/ , ---- � r. / ARK �i/B�l - pVP • • ^ '-• ._-✓== / y�=LAND USE LEGEND M° L _ 1_1�i . ON M : _!l_^'r:✓r-:• -'r.-`. '= --r`ir_ -,-- :,... -r� AAPCREAPROGXE IIII,I II:NNNN$II$IIIii.INIIJIi�/ Gp .1 � - r (SYMBOL LAND USE GENE _5-.,-v: -:ti_`r, � ,,_J _ ., rf-=- _:.,•-__ �, , - _.__ r Pll ' :i^7; : SINGLE F i ; • :r rr. • _ _ - - - _ W — MULTI-FAMILY 9 ~Y r LOW DENSITY 6 AC _ r' ar - cc J • �"'� , - - � �` ^_-_rr'--ate, J=r,.:-•.:-: nI i0-0-—i IIIIII - - ____ __ -__�%"...%'c;=.r.S {-� HIGH DENSITY MULTI-FAMILY f r= f` f' I�� __` NIA REDUCED SCALE °; � _ AKE °M : -.:: GREENBELT 11.0 AC _ - _- ' . ... 0,1 col co) cn ::J COND.1ERCLAL 3.5 AC .... • I''' I s?• Z J • - NORTH 1"=100' < a `1 TOTAL SITE AREA (APPROX.) 24.5 AC 4. O C 0 /00 200 300 400 illTil • PER THE CITY OF RE:ITON COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, h- m t Q 1F BASED UPON ASSUMED BOUNDARY, AS SHOWN. BOUNDARY INFORMATION HAS BEEN OBTAINED a • FROM A 7/15/86 UPDATE OF THE KING COUNTY SHEET OF -ASSESSOR'S MAPS. TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION 1 HAS BEEN PROVIDED BY DEGROSS AERIAL MAPPING COMPANY(12/14/88). _ _ Lx+O":ECT,4,,,..eEa • RR17U 1 \ I I IIIpH , \. • .• 1 :,'1.0 1 C1:1,1 ? 43cr, i Pi . ' • . : ..:.:dc.) I' ci . k::::.:... ..... t,:1•!...'.• .'..t.. .\' . , •. b. ' ' X. L. h .'. • .•:. •.. :(I ( C ,..-1;"•-•::.:::i.••''..........- ....- ....... -,_ ,41,4,4,- ‘, . ilk ii i,..., •i ., .......-'''' \ -.. . ,.. 1 .t. ' � .• i. i,.. aO N O (J., r�, ,:: !, . \ i` _ �; 1.......s ,;.,......;,.:. ,...,..!,..... : ....,_._:-. .,:.... ••:::... •........., . );,.!..-... . \ . .., \ \, . ,.. 1) . at 01 4..•• . \ ' \ \ . • . • 4t.tlr�}�'YI; r`� —\..itl Iit \I 1 11; 1 " t \ 1 ` . t 41"• �S • �j1111i'1r7��r, • \ \ • ` I'll 1 \1 I I'I At,\ t r 1 V 1 1 i 'A,. SIS iv'ai''\VSSr II' I i. 1 I'1i' I • ti '1'•1}t}41t;t5 �,,r.11�'ry',5; •• ���\\�\ N S\'• 1 i:Iti 11 , t` N - .ram• ,I, .\ \ ,.\,,.'c\.,,\'.,V;\,;•,\y,,,c\ic‘,,,,,,y,.,,,,‘,,,,,..c, lq,---„,,.. ). i i..' *Z.2 40 I•• * \ 1 ',11'. ,Ass-•• k \''''",r%''''Vr1;.''VrirA,\WA\t; .-/- "‘....,,• wp. Ape\ ' \ 1••• 1'!: .'.> l v,\\•,\.,1\cMO\ ••'.., i• j( /‘14\k, ''\*N‘Af 44". !I !. PI " .' \%\01\ / / '1 ....,....)s\ 4 14,4,* :. .>„ . 1 . I,tilytr�yti�t1``�111ttctt C, Ar 1 \Ng �, k ti- 4 Iii11 1444c I,I %is:, .0 •• '"rrr,Sr,,;r," ,15�.1y C •`••. �,. V\a `r, „`t5 V' riyl C �SSStttS�i�55}'lr`tr`(t,yt.rr`(t, 1O Z. Rl'. •.,'1 �' .•�' . cr) �1,y51ttt` ;;,5,•t5tt1;'c515\,1\5;. 3 ? , :� ``�;'.. -- �.• tl 11t'774((V.`A11\'`1.1,1'tt\ 3 �,` 7\ \.7 `` ` • 1 • ,A,,),,iS,�.tt;;11�:S`%,.:�.,'I,1:1t, D Z fir': • ,f^ E'1•\ (. \ - S .,.. . '4ksiS 44 Z • 1 •\ [ �!4'lt1't,Sl.S'i;St�Si155551��f QJ . ' A .. _...„__... ki4k \ 4 ,.: ,, L..:°.:: ,';,11'ti tVl1yS,1' D D'• ` `� `}��jr jj1(}\ ...!...:::':. \ : �;,t�t�:;'tit . ���(::::1:4\4:\\47%\\: • • :S Niki tr ........ f\--.ee'-''.\.\' .: .i 1 .,,,,\„‘,.,c.,;%,( :„, \ ' ' NNIk .'• :•-•': 4‘ . ' • .'I!:..I.,i':Ii '.I.. .• ' ;, L41:;iti1411. 0• E;41'ittit11;11 \\, .111' • 1.��``(tii .,... \IA41111k...ilk �; ;,:,.*:',\A:i• . Iii ,.„ •..•'.',.'.M.:kJ I '! , \ 1.,,..,' ,k‘\*Nt,.... ...ANIkv .\ ' . . .:!Y:.l. . ;,',...,%,'A,i,,,,\W,c\ .:.,.;...1,, : \ 1 ,i.,„‘„,c,.c„„,„„, : ,... 0. 1, ...,.„4,04., .. :. . \ . . 4 t „ a . ,. , . : i .. ....., .. s .,... i . .,:.‘.,:y'A sti,%%\\, 1.p' I , 4::\7k. 1 \\...••••.. ..!1.' ';, .:. ,%Ic`i<'tltstt:ttt'i,S41 . . , . IP •• • . , :,,,,,,t, •__ -;,,, , A*...../ ....,:\...k'Iv- :.,"•I: : 1 MO 85 ,,�„ ��`" `''i5:•t''',SiSS'' }'41 `t. O . \. 4 , Ir` �. • • ;1' ''.•I 5 '%Iiii` ttl7lf p o ;';;;,} t'St1S�y • n �� 4��� ,� t(I;41i511 y �� ,Ntu,N,‘\\ ,4 ,,I, i M .,Sr.,.', • o -! •,, \ .• ''04 o 2 \ .1‘..i:\.. ..vt:::,,._. ,4,:'' ‘.. -Ni..\'‘‘‘.117\.4ANN.,s \:63:zi. 1.,:i :.. mu w �� n 1 . CA g 1.-► D ' "' �\* V `� `,i xzz m `������ • tip:;. ;:': oo° 8 G .•..,,71 ,N ,.... . • P y y. ' 1, yyy , , • i ` == �: 1�, t, I DATE AUGUST I9119 F.I SLOPE ANALYS/S DODDS ENGINEERS , INC . 1� '••.. �" `��` "� r,rra RI DESIGNED R.LEWIS CIVIL ENGINEERING SURVEYING PLANNING CC q `P IEW, f ' J co ^d % Li �1 DRAWN R.LEWIS THE BLUFFS _ _ 4205-'14BTH AVE.N.E.-SUITE 200 ` b(((7777 u• APPROVED R.LEWIS Ir IR! BELLEVUE,WASHINGTON 8BD07 d _m I"� q ROY E.LEWIS,ill,Y.L. wwn��° `�t� FADiE C7 r n4r:NGEq RENTON ' ' Id -4�55-7B77 OR 454-3743 WASIIINCTON `•• I...-- —1 •Q 26-B 7 WATER SUPPLY Water supply is available from a recently extended water system north of The Bluffs. This existing 16" water system is strong, providing over 3920 GPM at the nearby Marina Landing Apartments. The supply of this water system lies within the 435 Pressure Zone. The pressure is reduced to the 320 Pressure Zone, to serve the Marina Landing Apartments, which lie north and west (below) The Bluffs. Pressure is reduced once again to the 196 Pressure Zone, just prior to the connection to the Gene Coulon Park water system. This interconnection completes a major City loop. The Bluffs' water system will extend from the existing 16" main, which parallels I-405, on the hillside above Marina Landing. A 16" extension may be required since it is a single source providing over 3500 GPM. Construction of the first 600' of this extension may be challenging. The existing topography is somewhat steep and undulating, requiring noticeable grading for construction access and permanent access for maintenance. Route selection will be important to minimize construction impacts. Once the main reaches the developed area of The Bluffs, construction will easily conform to the final grades of the site. Pressure must be reduced from the 435 Pressure Zone to the 320 Pressure Zone to serve the site. This will yield onsite static pressures of 60 to 70 PSI, which are optimal. The extension will continue through the site, down the proposed Bluffs entrance road, to Lake Washington Boulevard. Here, pressure will be reduced to the 196 Pressure Zone and connected to an existing 12" main in Lake Washington Boulevard, approximately 300' south of the proposed entrance road. This will PAGE 1 complete another valuable loop for the City's water system. A loop is required for all sites with required fire flows over 2500 GPM. At this time it is estimated that the required fire flow for the site will be approximately 3000 - 4000 GPM. Sprinklered buildings (as proposed), fire resistive building materials and/or fire walls can significantly reduce (50% +/-) the fire flow requirement. Consumptive water demands are determined by domestic and irrigation uses. Domestic uses can be approximated at 100 Gal/Person/Day and summer time irrigation uses can be approximated at 600 Gal/Acre/Day. The table on the next page indicates consumptive water demands of 34,800 Gal/Day (or 24.17 GPM) for the proposed development. The consumptive requirements are insignificant when compared to the required fire flows. The proposed system improvements will satisfy both needs while providing a more robust regional system. A schematic of the existing and proposed water systems is provided for reference. PAGE 2 THE BLUFFS POPULATION ESTIMATE ALTERNATIVE `PREFERRED> #OF UNITS 95 135 <` 165[> < 240 1 BEDROOM UNITS 0 67 <>><< 82< 120 2 BEDROOM UNITS 65 54 66' <' : 96 • 3 BEDROOM UNITS 30 14 <>1'I:`:i«`< <€<: 24 - ESTIMATED 268 , 285 <€<`<>38'<s' €< 504 POPULATION *BASED UPON 1.5'PERSONS PER ONE BEDROOM, 2.5 PERSONS PER TWO BEDROOM AND 3.5 PERSONS PER THREE BEDROOM. WATER DEMAND • ALTERNATIVE '::::'REFERRED>f: .................................. ................................... .................................... .................................... .................................... '#OF UNITS 95 135 < ; €165s; :s< `I 240 DOMESTIC FLOW (GAL/DAY) 26,800 28,500 4 800 50,400 (GAL/MIN) 18.61 19.79 24 17 < «_ 35.00 *BASED UPON 100 GAL/PERSON/DAY. ................................... LANDSCAPED AREA 8.1 AC 4.8 AC 4'rI;`AC <€« €: 6.2 AC IRRIGATION FLOW (GAL/DAY) 4860 2880 :2460 >> 3720 (GAL/MIN) 3.38 2.00 <"171 2.58 * BASED UPON 600 GAL/ACRE/DAY. ................................... • .. ............................... TOTAL FLOW . (GAL/DAY) 31,660 31,380 >37260: `?` 54,120 (GAL/MIN) 21.99 21.79 <'25 8$'<<°'' 37.58 a • _�� • �- --OPOSED WAYFR MAN(TYP.I PROPoSEb PRY _f—� ' `� - • • 435 PRESSURE ZONE Q EX/STING WATER • • 3e� PIrFSSLR_ ZONE _ -�--— - --' - - ._ .- ' SYSTEM(TYP,1 • - - PYRE HYDRANT(TYP) - --'- - -. - - - '- ._.- .�P• /�� l . \ - . i. . t+ - - - " ' nwrns J ' '- ., ., ,- '/ : JG ' ..i - - .-, --'i 'ce - ` r iii% / i !-�/. . � . /�i /-rir ���// / te :r� q '^"'„ . .^ 11011,01ffirt-*Nc: I. Ay':))) ti. ,, , ,.... ,,,,,,,: . NSION . , A \ ____---- co 0 z 9 cr # .L.,-4..-___.-- . .( *- Et i 0 .ir r,�P •16 WA R MAW". ._� �� 150\ � �� ,/ �.... w �, \ / • _%:_ ``VA/ / �i �l ,asp�'� _rw � ![ — W> 3 m 1. a 1 / ". W ,�? rET,P, � 1 l• ./► n " ♦� ��_ a CO23 6-w _in u; th I!�t^ 1 • i,''" r'� ) �� �. / \" ����' / PSfD PRV o Epp 1� EXYsr/AG Pqv�`../• %y..� ,•:` ._. -_ --- i-- xnm`. WAL _/��- �i-" — -- --- O(7 1c� j;' 435 AYE•T-7pyE, - - - /.• s _. - � 6 PRES E W w -.e r • �J 320 ss7 ZONE ,% - ' ,(/ 6 w z¢ v m -2 '' ' ...---- _.---, 0 Z -—..'1 • .'I:T., ,,,. 4111*Nw.6?,40: ",.. A . 5. . j.'r e iii p�klrl ► O� 1114 .. , `'- J W 1. i- C N' / EXISTING WATER • e W MARINA �, ,IINr_� - srsrEM mP/ c7 ntkl 7. LANDING ` W KE µr RN AIL—OAG a^W /z" W APARTMENTS \ ✓ Iz_ LA elw tN R d E � 3 0 GTON- N PARK 12°W /- NG PRV RLIN nnCCAC _ �rT' W 320 PRESSY/EE?OIb£' BL D� i•-:-_ r 12 /96 P SURE ZONE ORIAL _ -- / == MEM =_ _.._ _:__==_=_ = W 4i G _ =` " = _ = s. • __ - _ = ' = rI- GTON REDUCED SCALE z iti./'-+ .ftf=- _ - LAKE - 0.: !I a _ � NORTH 1" I r F w • n d d d v'i Z se mi • 3.,_ 0 /00 200 300 400 .1 a 0 BOUNDARY INFORMATION HAS BEEN OBTAINED FROM A Z w >. 7/15/86 UPDATE OF THE KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S W m 3 i °z MAP. TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION HAS BEEN OBTAINED a �I g a FROM 1962 CITY OF RENTON AERIAL PHOTOS. I-405 STORM DRAINAGE FORMATION HAS BEEN OBTAINED SHEET Of IN FROM 1983 WSDOT AS-BUILTS. LAKE WASHINGTON • - BLVD.STORM DRAINAGE INFORMATION HAS BEEN OBTAINED FROM 1986 MARINA LANDING AS-BUILTS. .m,UL KI......W..,.. . - - CT nLNv6EA 88139 SANITARY SEWER The ultimate discharge point for all sanitary sewers in this area is a 96" METRO trunk line which is parallel to and westerly of the Burlington Northern Railroad. There are two nearby 8" taps into this METRO main.. One is the recently completed Marina Landing Apartments tap, which is located near the main entrance to the Gene Coulon Park. The service area of this tap is very small and ultimate capacity problems are not anticipated. The second tap is located near the south entrance to the Gene Coulon Park, approximately 450' south of the proposed Bluffs entrance road. This tap serves a rather large area, yet the City of Renton (per an analysis provided by RH2 Engineering, attached) indicates that there are no anticipated capacity problems for the pipe segments downstream of the proposed connection point for The Bluffs. This location will be the likely connection point for The Bluffs' sanitary sewer. The sanitary sewer alignment will follow the roadway alignment through the development. The proposed development will be sewered from north to south, then down the proposed Bluffs entrance road, to the existing southerly sewer stub in Lake Washington Boulevard. As estimated in the section on Water Supply, the average daily sewage flows will probably be around 100 Gal/Person/Day. The estimated flows of 34,800 Gal/Day (or 24.17 GPM) are well within the capacity of the downstream systems. A schematic of the existing and proposed sanitary sewer systems is provided for reference. PAGE 3 • • 1 i \ . /,;• " 1�,�j �I . I• )),?1 (1(.: .ii,- 17(i • •,..... \-At : ..-..._.1d . ir ( i.;--7-1F,:::: .... .-, ( ,L,.,) :::...,.........: ‘:_a\\ \% ,:,; -,.,,,:!1 . ' :' 1 \ \---,..... jam_%...! c p\ •: �. --; -mac. \, \ ��� \:' 11 \! !I ,r SS'S4t4Stiur \ ''< �. 1 If ,L� i I ii, i i i •1H :,,. i \ , • (..\ ' 1 1. I v.c `}o,:,:�t}';,,r�ttt', - \ \ I •'.'`,`S` III'1 ; , i` , �i f; . i!.'� .l 1'N S',`p4,4 t 19' III I,t- \ '. i 4 r lj?,, y I I I: ... 'S41 ', '�, I li L, ;'l'!'it 4i'",,1.'',1:';i,,'. � 11 II' is ''S'SSS,iIt�IS'r4`i,'`�S441i Si(�",544' ' ' ?ShZS�tr:li;�'',r�;S4�"tiSSlS S �g \ .- , • .1 r';./ I ; r �.'r 4 S''rti44 '<,''\tl:;i; Z ),-. . . l t . , I lo- S ,:44 tSSrJ • /' • ' 4,1''gC'* y$ % ;III Ste►/ 1/l -�� ', "r Ir !4-, II I : 1 1— 'Sri ,';.;:'.::„ i} • y/ . ,!;;11`�� I, • :4 i ;$ .� ' D � ,> `4`r1S```y44',',if''4},4f;1 �o;C� ' ;rl(I ,I �� � ?\ 'r:,,,,, 441,,,,'r54S} " r(I I'f/J lr (� Cal Lt'i!„,, ,'`51„,..,, Ar ,;: .' ,, :,:(/,/:::,,...., 'i g : .A ,•t ,," Irg• i;,,,,A,,,,',w,,,,,,,,.,,;,. \ , 4',t,44,S Su't"`r4"4ti4�4,r � � � - � I,.�Ji, J'� `t�,'ti1''SS;ti SY�y`'ti` 'S " - Zi/ � ♦ k .• {` 1 ��o'�';V; _ ',\ 1 41. ,r,S4• }'t'r�,:6,.. ';1 Z c../ti l',,,,;',X,: �•. 1 Lq 2 ") ,may %;. /; ,, � ��i `�r;,., ,,rr,,, 111 4`�''�\ - —� � 4 p / r \ .1....... - 't,ti`;,,\t` 'S'Z''`.t\'.t' i�', _ • - \ '7). . 0% •'�1 r mn ', :1�,!,'r,it r. , O i; „S. ,, r 11 :4J ',, �o 0 1 IV. ,r l r ', / I z i.1}ti'4"r4;'SSS'ttti tii t i ;;'I m , ` - ,i r r .q 1 . \` y 4Sa o \t t; '' D ` 8 t I 41r' �'SS a'•;, 1 1, ,A(‘\,.',.,,,:,,:t:,w.,.',,A . , icst,4,,f . - oNlf-,til, ;;. ,\ ,,,x,,,,474/ _ ..,..,......,.,. ........ • ..,... iii ,. , V,,',,,c„,:::,',:,„.Y4::,:M:„ I ,,r y.\ ...., ‘ , , \ , : ') .- 1 4': ,`'�,v4r;',�` .`,..H '':' ^el, 1 t 1,'. 1.,3 \c,,I,,,,,,,,,!,,\\,,Vi,r,. \'',,, ,,,,:,..„,,,'A‘t„:, - - ("\ .i:,... .,:,7:( 1:.,,..'eta ' 1 Vpil 1:\,i, , 'i.! ! • , 4y'ss},,�'ties I41,1%,A,... OP/N\7:-. T^ r ��,44tS, ; i\ \ \; , I • Foill�y r:rr1,1 44 0 p`mp.C7 N�0 '�'il 4t'S\1"f���'51,1.+ - .� \ �.un r 'l ., '/, '-O ,.,IfliiP t'.' Ctrs \ \ '� �: . 1 ` ,11 �. \ g;111§0 .oWy (i 11S • / \; f YO. C11,-,E1 6 `�I�� v ; '` i� --��' II i 1 i 01 II A .. ., \ . ,, �z�`°oy C D \V:._.j . .I � �, 8 r � o�000(D�O;d m ��� yb, N xg�� �$Ta2 is o z okmm i 4 2hngV `� 1 1 t\ \ I CC ` o 0 DATE AUGUST I989 na REVISON6 OATF ' ) „ 7--\• \ SANITARY SEWER EXHIBIT DODD8 ENGINEER8 , INC . �t.�Ews'•ti♦ COoo n DESIGNED R.LES CIVIL ENGINEERING SURVEYING PLANNING (k0 '�•O% " DRAWN APPROVED LEWIS • THE BLUFFS 4205-14BTH AVE.N.E.-SUITE 200' - BELLEVUE.WASHINGTON EE007 it ROY E.LEWIS,JR,P.E. _ . .`e. _,....�O. D PROJECT MANAGER RENTON .).7---. WASHINGTON — S.,, `7'. 12061 EE5-7E177 OR 454-3743 Engineering S1292.00(.243) November 1, 1989 Mr. Colin Quinn Lincoln Properties 1745-114th Avenue SE, Suite 100 Bellevue, WA 98004 SUBJECT: SANITARY SEWER ANALYSIS FOR 'TILE BLUFFS" PROPOSED APARTMENT COMPLEX Dear Mr. Quinn: An analysis of the City of Renton's sanitary sewer system was performed for the purpose of determining the available capacity of the existing sewers in the vicinity of the proposed apartment complex called The Bluffs, located on the east side of Lake Washington Boulevard North. This letter summarizes the available capacity of the City's sanitary sewer system based on results of a computer analysis simulating wastewater flows in this location. The analysis was based on the existing sanitary sewer system without adding any new sewer extensions proposed for this project. The existing system consists of two manholes before the sanitary sewer discharges to the METRO Interceptor. The first manhole is MH 12-149 and is approximately 6 feet deep. At this time, no wastewater flows are entering this manhole. An 8-inch steel sewer pipe extends from manhole 12-149 to manhole 12- 148 as it crosses under the railroad tracks. The depth of manhole 12-148 is approximately 17 feet. A summary of the physical data for this section of the sanitary sewer is presented below: Pipe Size: 8-inch Pipe Length: 121 Feet Average Pipe Slope: 2.83% Mannings Coefficient: 0.013 Maximum Ratio of Depth to Diameter: 0.70 The results of this analysis indicate that the maximum capacity for this section the existing system is approximately 760 gpm. The City is proposing in the update of its Comprehensive Sewer Plan that the estimated peak, wet weather flow should not exceed 70% of the sanitary sewers maximum design capacity based on the above criteria. Using this criteria the maximum allowable flow in this section of sanitary sewer would be 535 gpm. There is a limited amount of available data regarding the section of sanitary sewer between MH 12-148 and the METRO Interceptor. The only information known is that 1410 Market Street, P.O. Box 1180, Kirkland, Washington 98033 (206) 827-6400 • the sanitary sewer is 8-inches in diameter. The combined estimated saturation wastewater flowrate entering MH 12-148 from MH 12-147 and MH 12-150 is 530 gpm. The minimum slope to accommodate this 530 gpm from MH 12-148 to the METRO Interceptor is 2.8%. A slope greater than 2.8% or replacement with a larger diameter sanitary sewer would be necessary to accommodate any additional wastewater from MH 12-149. The figure showing the location of this section of the City's sanitary sewer system is attached for your reference. A copy of the computer analysis has been retained in this office for future reference. If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact me. Sincerely, RH2 Engineering, P.S. Mark L. Semrau, P.E. Enclosures: Sanitary Sewer Node Diagram cc: Mr. Roy Lewis, Dodd's Engineers .iii 'I'" I!" ' ;': : (.,/...1-0. • • , - ' • .... .-i", -,.... .......„........., N.. ,,,...,:,.. .. irl i ' -i i .. : • ' . !, ,..• 1 \ I. ,r • , el ,t.,!J 11\ ........... .. 11''":,;--"*"*.".-1'1 i liN i.i.':. ..,, . frit --......-1(..;_y :. ! • ' 1- ' c--rir-1.-- r ..i;...4) ---j-..0,..) --i h..... \:::::....., - 1 1!.).1 !...' I it\I • ...(34‘.:*)•••.0 %.e .....,.......... ...,... 1‹ .:::.. i 1 ,• • •••••••...4. 4 : i k's V:::,‘.. I l' 1 I I •, : %. •se • 1 ..• • • ..4 I..*I "-*"........... I l' I i • •4111111110k.101111ln/61 1 '. . s. \ • -.1 i 'I' '••• •. ..'• ,.:'.0! '//70...gret A:.• @ 't Ct...\4?1 6 " • • , 1 r I • .: i. • ' . . . .. ... i s s; •' I • I ' , ' ,425 : ,...t. :i . ...v. . x , /„...„;.,:. • •EDI • 2, @• • 11.- 0/0--- - e ,. 1.6, . •.,.. . , 0 ....L.., •.k..,.,......4., \.:‘,.,../, ..e va 4 ..\• :•••4:: : • A. • A\ ',. ‘.4;,.„,ilt i ; 1 •• LI or;u4s.41.17 .i---..i'''' .....11 .4 'ic.‘ I •:./ ..•-• e ‘N.sz....\ \ % r 4A, I i • v_.........i.:. / c 1: ,3i .-.• -1 *) ••70 . A 1 C) . I• • • Butoog (. \... \ ,.,:l . I . , , 1 .. i ' - -- -0 2 7 0 .r : t • i ... • (6!V ; . \X\ lik.N. . •.• t • 1 t.'‘ .'"'" \ ii!ti.' 4 .•-• ..a \ .‘ \ \ ‘ ,vo. . A .. .. is..., , • itql ns. ,,..., tx__.. .... ® \ .,.:.. ot ,:: , ...I.\ , ..,,,(20 CO • x ts.: ‘ . r.•:-•-• . . i •' t'... 1. V: ''.,,....- ........ -. • -..1 • ri / 1 %e t..0'.., .•,...,-- -....,,..-x•-•A ‘ ‘ -. - .1"z, ••• 4 V / 'Oil' Alb. - - • . ,i. ... , , ... D......._,1 VA rAl \ • • l %..-; .. . C.." • '•.,, :.7.'.: 1.1:':\ t % \ \ .,V•.' O. • 4........ ...t'1.1 el --.1...14— e •,......L),cipi. .. • .„... .• . • ...,„ \ i .,...----- t : • I et.7 i - kFt1,1 :•r: I. i t s•••• 1 N, •. 737. ‘ 1. 1* . "•... \ 7!lr, i \ A.C•\.r•\‘:.:...ti \ • i);•.. \; % - ' 1 -:..1:, :.......Y-1'® f I )i • •::',. ,,,i 1 \ d'.,•. 1 1..‘ 1 .• s• .• .'..N .v..\ , . • ,(...,...,.. , . .... ./ i ii:-.•....: ',f.) k . • Z.a. %. \\XI, ‘• t..1.C) N / ! ..• .. „-, .., : .., ............._...........___, . . \,., \ ,„....,,... , , . • .. .... ... .. I ... r•I : :.. , v.c.. \ \ ' 6_,......_........_....:‘,..:,‘„ .... i \ • .....v.. . :._ : E ; 1.(...11% , ...at (73'. IA\ \ \ (:) • ,...."\ V,\ : 1 ‘A, ,....•-- • - •. .• f! ' Vk\ - • ' e----- ,../.......A.ar --; r-r—i .: ---- r \\.\\ . .. \ 1 ,i) .: IA\ , . 1 1 1m ‘ . \ .s. k .... • 1 ! 04 .,.... :----------- ,ie.),• (Li) "::••• I - 1 . '0%,1 I 1 ;.......,..._- -.=.-4 ‘t i ... 1 •\ 1 ' . \ \ \i\ ./...:.1. 1•.i sO /101 ‘ •.:* ."... ".. f‘g. • %‘i ‘ I .• 4‘ ‘i1 1. -\ ". . • A.1 i os 4/ 0.....,... , / f•t• •*\ 1' \ Y‘,‘. ., 0 /• • ...31 / • . f-s\i. ,,fib. • ,,,,, ..... . ‘V 1 ..1. \ • . \ 1.`,I • . / • / 4)' // ••• ' •‘ ... \ I A• • +7; ../.4;•',1 /', /. .,. 0 , \\...N / //10. , .. . ,ef ./r /.N.:. * //4/ /•s.,!;@ :III \t...% / .-t) q I's, ..0:.•• i• ...- •- •---7,.\ ..>. • 1 t.‘ 1. \ • \ v.„ ,4 .7.7/oe • . : : _____?".... ,, ;A •i...„! fl‘%%•. ..-.'• . . ID 4... • i . 1 4e:1 ' s'•...,1/4)-..9 @dal 1.‘\pif c3. ,r8 , ,/„....s,.....,// \•:). i i .1 d 1/..................sl : .1 i ;•.1..•J • s .1 W • • 0 4. ..••••-.1.• .--41. ::;z.. p ' _. ..,,,,, , . ...1,„.„ , • . , A , , , . . .: .. Lcirv. • r •.4..:: ' ...-•=4.. : r•., i! ..---. • 411 .• "9.--. '' 't , !..... • ................... i .$ ti--- . •, k;.\\ -,• i AP.;-.......---...................._ eie I. ...! kr... I ___I...d/; . ! • ! a i I \\ i ‘ U1 t ; i j i i I : t.....x.), ! 1 i 1 •. •.,:. . 1 ‘'.01 \ 1 •ri id , - , • , i ..• Ail I i I I i 1 1 , ., 1. i •‘1 ii i ' i•-1 -..)\I.-,:i 0 • 2 /-i.1,9 • . . . .. • • • . . • • • . . • .• : . . •• • •. .. . - • • • . . • • • , . . . .. .. • • . . , . ,.•' STORM DRAINAGE Attached for reference is an exhibit which delineates the various drainage basins associated with development of The Bluffs. The total drainage basin under analysis consists of 65.90 acres; 41.40 acres offsite and 24.50 acres onsite. The ridges and valleys clearly delineate eight major sub-basins which combine at three separate discharge points. I-405 and Jones Ave. N.E. (further to the east) intercept and divert to the south, a portion of the offsite drainage. The undiverted drainage is processed by the I-405 drainage system and discharged into The Bluffs' natural valley areas, as shown on the provided exhibit. Drainage apparently filters to the valley floor and is conveyed westerly towards Lake Washington. After close (late summer) review of each valley, it was difficult to locate a well-defined drainage flow path. Small drainage basins, porous soils and well vegetated slopes appear to reduce the potential for concentrated flows. There is no evidence of erosion in the upper valley floors. The valleys are characterized by a uniform, undisturbed covering of forest litter. Apparently, the valley floors can easily handle the existing tributary flows. Lake Washington Boulevard acts as a lower drainage interceptor. A roadside ditch conveys intercepted flows to the north and the south, from a high point just north of the proposed Bluffs entrance road. This ditch also shows little sign of erosion. The northerly flows are intercepted by the recently completed Marina Landing Apartments storm drainage system. This system drains beneath Lake Washington Boulevard via three pre-Marina Landing culverts. Drainage is then PAGE 4 culverted beneath the Burlington Northern Railroad tracks, into the Gene Coulon Park storm drainage system. The park's system then conveys drainage directly into Lake Washington. A recent inspection of these downstream systems showed well armored channels with little sign of erosion or capacity problems. The drainage which flows south along Lake Washington Boulevard is eventually intercepted by a 12" concrete culvert located just north of the N. 14th St. right-of-way. This culvert discharges into a swale along the east side of the Burlington Northern Railroad. Shortly downstream, this swale is intercepted by a 24" concrete culvert which extends beneath the Burlington Northern Railroad and ties directly into the Gene Coulon Park 24" CMP storm drainage system. This park system discharges, a short distance away, into a natural, well maintained stream, which gently meanders into Lake Washington. The stream bottom is lined with cobbles and shows little evidence of erosion. The stream banks are lined with dense, tall grasses which appear to protect the channel well. An exhibit of this downstream system is provided on the next page. In summary, existing onsite and downstream storm drainage systems appear to be well suited for the tributary flows. There is little evidence of erosion or capacity problems in these storm drainage conveyance systems. Development of The Bluffs will alter existing drainage conditions. Buildings and paved surfaces will be constructed, replacing existing ground cover with impervious surfaces. Other areas of natural vegetation will be removed during grading operations and replaced with urban-like landscaping. These alterations will increase the rate of surface runoff and decrease the uniform rate of groundwater recharge. The approximate magnitude of these disturbances is tabulated in the pages PAGE 5 that follow. For the proposed development, approximately 8.3 acres of the site will be disturbed during development. This 8.3 acres represents 33.9% of the 24.5 acre site or only 12.6% of the 65.9 acre drainage basin. Only 4.2 acres of this • disturbance will be converted into impervious surfaces; the remaining 4.1 acres will be landscaped or restored to pre-developed conditions. As shown on the attached "24-Hour Storm Runoff Estimates" table (for the 165 unit alternative), developed stormwater runoff will :average 167% of the existing runoff rate. The existing conveyance systems can hydraulically handle this minor increase in flow, but concentration of flows, at the increased rates, may increase the probability of erosion in the steeper slopes. To reduce the potential for erosion and help mitigate the impacts of increased stormwater discharge rates, several standard design practices can be implemented. Conveying developed storm drainage runoff through tight-lined systems minimizes the potential for erosion of the natural channels. Offsite flows will continue in the natural ravines, but developed flows will be intercepted by tight-lined systems which will be designed to convey the developed 100-year stormwater runoff. The proposed development will convey developed drainage down the proposed entrance road to the toe of the bluffs. Here, where grades are gentle, the flows can be safely directed to the existing conveyance systems, which have adequate capacity for the nominal increase in flows. A stormwater detention pond can be constructed to help maintain the existing rates of stormwater runoff and provide settling time for water quality enhancement . PAGE 6 By maintaining existing drainage basin boundaries, flows will be directed to the locations that have historically proven to have adequate capacity. A planting of dense, hardy grasses, downstream of discharge points, will help in flow attenuation, distribution and filtering. The use of oil/water separator vaults (prior to discharge), the use of dense vegetation just below the discharge points and the maintenance of existing vegetation in the natural valley floors will aid in water quality enhancement. The ultimate receiving waters should notice little water quality degradation due to construction of The Bluffs. It is important to plan for good water quality management, especially during the construction period. Noticeable cuts and fills will have to be accomplished in order to access and develop The Bluffs. These exposed cut and fill slopes will need to be protected from erosion due to rainfall. Hydroseeding or permanent revegetation should be in place as soon as practical. Mulching and plastic sheeting may be required in areas of special sensitivity. If grading operations are quickly performed and/or completed in small phases, the potential for erosion will be reduced. In any case, providing sedimentation ponds and maintaining dense vegetation, where practical, will aid in the entrapment of eroded soils, minimizing the potential for siltation of downstream streams and Lake Washington. PAGE 7 THE BLUFFS ESTIMATION OF SITE DISTURBANCE . . .. .... . ... .. ... ............ ......... ..... ALTERNATIVE 'PREFERRED;:: .................................. .................................... #OF UNITS 95 135 < `:'I65 240 TOTAL AREA OF 12.6 AC 8.9 AC >[>8s3<AC<>`<>`:> 12.6 AC DEVELOPMENT IMPERVIOUS AREA 4.5 AC 4.1 AC <':>'>Ai2'.fiAC>'?:«` 6.4 AC • PERVIOUS AREA 8.1 AC 4.8 AC ':''"4'<I'<AC > » 6.2 AC APPROXIMATE 73,000 CY 66,000 CY igii.;!8419.0f:::c.Vigi 77,000 CY VOLUME OF CUT APPROXIMATE 36,000 CY 31,000 CY L OOQ s 32,000 CY VOLUME OF FILL .................................. *THE AREAS OF DEVELOPMENT, IMPERVIOUS AREAS AND PERVIOUS AREAS HAVE BEEN OBTAINED FROM TABLES PREPARED BY ' MILBRANDT ARCHITECTS. THE BLUFFS 24-HOUR STORM RUNOFF ESTIMATES TIME OF 2-YEAR 5-YEAR 10-YEAR 25-YEAR 50-YEAR 100-YEAR AREA CURVE CONC. RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF BASIN# (ACRES) NUMBER (MINUTES) (CFS) (CFS) (CFS) (CFS) (CFS) (CFS) EXISTING CONDITIONS 1 16.40 71 18.1 0.16 0.62 1.38 2.33 2.85 3.41 2 14.50 72 21.9 0.15 0.61 1.30 2.14 2.59 3.06 3 14.30 68 24.5 0.10 0.42 0.70 1.29 1.66 2.06 4 3.16 55 18.3 0.00 0.03 0.06 0.10 0.11 0.13 _ 5 2.31 55 16.9 0.00 0.02 0.04 - 0.07 0.08 0.10 6 3.93 55 23.1 0.00 0.04 0.07 0.12 0.14 0.16 7 2.52 55 15.4 0.00 0.03 0.05 0.08 0.09 0.11 8 8.78 86 15.2 0.65 2.08 2.89 3.74 4.18 4.62 2+3+4 31.96 68 24.5 0.21 0.93 1.56 2.88 3.71 4.60 5+6+7+8 17.54 71 28.3 0.16 0.63 1.22 2.11 2.61 3.12 DEVELOPED CONDITIONS 1 16.40 71 18.1 0.16 0.62 1.38 2.33 2.85 3.41 2+3+4 31.96 73 24.5 0.36 1.50 3.10 4.96 5.96 7.01 5+6+7+8 17.54 76 28.3 0.26 1.25 2.22 3.31 3.89 4.50 * BASED UPON THE SANTA BARBARA UNIT HYDROGRAPH METHODOLOGY. *24-HOUR RAINFALL AMOUNTS ARE BASED UPON THE FOLLOWING TABLE. YEAR INCHES 2 1.50 5 2.50 10 3.00 *OBTAINED FROM THE NOAA ATLAS. 25 3.50 50 3.75 100 4.00 • • THE BLUFFS • COMPARISON OF DEVELOPED RAINFALL RUNOFF 2-YEAR 5-YEAR 10-YEAR 25-YEAR 50-YEAR 100-YEAR ALTERNATIVE RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF RUNOFF #OF UNITS (CFS) (CFS) (CFS) (CFS) (CFS) (CFS) 95 0.80 3.45 6.88 10.83 12.95 15.19 135 0.77 3.34 6.64 10.52 12.62 14.83 240 0.91 3.99 8.03 12.32 14.55 16.91 • . * BASED UPON "TOTAL" SITE FLOWS IN THE DEVELOPED CONDITION. 24-HOUR RAINFALL EVENT, UTILIZING THE SANTA BARBARA UNIT HYDROGRAPH METHODOLOGY. • • . • ' . 1 . . • . ..4 I I i I—1' I. V.Z711.11, -- - -;.' i . Fd 471-.. e.) ' • • :i.-..17- 747., -.:. ''. ...-.s,•74 -- -7-9--tfira-----;;. ;,- t.4' \ ‘-1----1(- _ " .-' .1/4- -- — 7 , •._',...:::__::',:-.--4,i,,.. ' .;•,, ,.1.'ij•. ... • :C111 ,, •4./...1 /1 P 0 •DE:1'ii.._(--cp.../.d gi(\s‘ °I '"us4' ....if 317 r....7 -1. 1.1-----•.:..---------:----;----=;•< , •."4,:;.•-:.-.7-• , , ,,,, ..., • _ .....__:,i___,-___----..--7„._ ••N \ ••+$-:+.'. -----. . 'i i4. -.1 I Lo' . ' i 13 rl,',..**CI:--1 1-_-_ •-• (1.11.. .11 ' ., ., a ; 0 f ' •••)7..c;,,'- •4 ac I I /"F4-1, N`'\ . t ' -i-• : a . ...Tr 0 \TI,...-....;-....,..... _ .......e i• --1, % . ,L--- c ,.-,-- /:' d . A „' •11:;: • -.T...-- ."-7, 1__ __.,,J_'__ :: • p r• \-..:--i-r- '.1,-4 .: : ,,,..-: .,.\ ir-xl a. C , '., _„/ ' 'kV, -4,7" -irrl I, .. t) • (I ,II : '-- .. .-.7- r•I-11/' .. 1C.• , •"-• -- • Li On ,‘ I GI ..! , . 'D a\-a. -..k I/ . _ t... , ,; IN* _ __II' , ,---.."( ! i i ,.-, la el • r ....„0„„,„\A, , .,,, .--...... , -.. (--, -..., -,..• .. „....s • ..___ 1411i ,• ,1_) ,,;.•,, ..ii .. ... [1; .1 --- ,, ,..,,„ , bo r. .4?- .i -7:-.i 1 te. 1 • --.11 , . •, -P-'----'....7,11 ._ -‘i, ,,„„_- -' , .A i I a r• . IP .0,00..."'"""" • I:1 ire„ ,04 ,s ' i, !Li. • ,„ , .-, l'al ;Mb",, ' , I '' r_ A . 84\27‘... '''.: All 11111. rk.-- ;„ • 1:.:;:::"---1 1, 1 \ , ., .‘ - - _7-, -,-i-- ,• . , . , .4 ver`tik Pr • \ • lit„i 114 1 "s' (1:-. 1;- __ ;: ' ' .._. irri.:, _,.,,,4,_ ,. \,..., • 4 - • •: . L-..--). • ,-., \\ ‘, l/if . - . -_-_-_-_`--P - ' P ,..... ))/i•-•'''''N" T. ( .1 1.,0.;,.• ,i . •; .::: J •,:.. — I 0 RV U\'‘....._. \J'. 11% II ' dji CI 1.,....., ., .i...‘i i i. • OR • q/ )L. k..:_.1 _, Nk i 1 1 wfP • "' \ . •,. i --.-,62-= i \--. );) 1 r..;.13'17,-ri I .• ,•• • •,k'\,i.\.,'.,'1:•\-'\••‘NA\‘'‘.'"•\'\,•1,,'11\i\'1•,\,\\\\iei1lA1,•\''i1,l,A_1'1l,"''V,,.\I,,\/,,,',`\,d,A.;.',',,.:,;-\.,,.,.-;\..\..-I.A-\-i:i\,. .t,-`--"r\-.--,\;'7--",0"(11iIli 1"„i,i1‘111 1-.1,-..t-.i,,-'.'"•7\'1\A)!:- -":.-::\,-'•::,,--: •,:,''' \ .s•.\**\.\\?,;1-A-„1.,,1:,Ii.,,i1.1 n_,a.)...o„:f4,144--7t.c-.i,j;i T„5'.lT-_-_4q'-._E,.,,:1-r.?1,1i•-.'1 I,,‘: ) ;?1•\'1'1'.. li.i.j.,1 or (ILX,.---\• ...•A:.\.-..T.1.\.„2:.:.7O7R.....,)z‘l_rf_sI i i.l XiIr["-iI \ . ..;..i[i,,cbii A.E 2-i r f1 ii7i..T.o._...ez•I1.,,i,",,i ,.z.w,i-..d_nt3,.r.'u,1 0 . ,l,,Lr..1.,.';le,C I-s(:.'-/—'`\.-,.N_.0.;_-1___-"7__2,.__1_,_4•.);i_1lI:_1l;.-st_-1.-4.)0,._.-' • • ' \ ., A ...., \v,\..-,,,•,,-...:•-•, •,., ,.„-t44 1 r,,,...L.... -; : :' al; \ " /lit .,..j'''',7,- ,; .:-_-_Th ,,,,,,\ N... ‘ ,„,„-- 1\ `). 'k\‘. \Nit‘NTOUS!,. 1 'f" S) ''__) , \-1) . \I-- I 1 •,,.111111/ Ik ,4)71„‘ 3 I. t `e.. It r\ \' V\\ ii A. °)i 14 j , ,/,,... Nv.17, ;• •1 2 • -1_, ..,. 'r• N• , !• \\\ v-,.... ' • - ---,110 (7. , i, .\ \, \ ,/,".:: 4 ... ,\ (S.,,, , skt:‘,4;: . 1 1,,,,,..., c, I :,:- ri-. i \\ \\\y..,•[..i-s------ .,. -_-4 1 .6)(;,.' . ,.., 1 , , ••• ,,i. ,, ;,k,', •,:, /:, 11. •'-.I':. - . \.kt. Nk, si;'•• l• ! ',., 4 'I -11 L-7V.-I' 01, • ....,___ •:.._-_-_-_-_.-- 14-,i • 2M-' s•,,..'. • , ‘‘',,,. ,, •e/V;ss, 1 r h Iii,%\ ,„*. i ., 1,1 , . . 0,•,, er,„: ,._• . s ‘ i''' ''4 --:...4.,,,„..0,1:A: 3\\* `\4...\ 11" I. 1 ti)•,!.13:ij 173 1,,...L - ..c.' . .--w :2--1 \ '-'''..7. '''''''''''.7*" .E.-'''':::::..:t.-4111C;:;c (f . ill ...... . ',1:;(.1.'L'. i h ,., .... _Alikki *;,' I i:Tio ,,.„; ---b- cl ''.7:;'; ; ,-.---._,_:•-•‘„_... ., .6111 ,-i;ir1( ,,,,- \E, :\,'\ ‘‘.\'‘''‘'a:: i/ &....?...'•••• ‘ k‘v=?A) NZ: ' •. 1* ir---- nr ----A,,\;,-1 ... ' ,'41 ' f ;„ , - 6 4. •2 j• \ ta...1 t j*I.:.-..."' 11. " \. 'N.'• .: V. in:,::.::!'.'.;.::t..‘:: . ,,. ..... Al I it, i ..}:1 . ( 1. .0 __ _ it,., .,.. 12,,,s._. 1..-1-ry ill -6-k`k 9 I' • ' ,\,' .• . II:-2.....1M.4. :....:i IA.. kTfr,,...,,,I . .4...9.3.1:'': '.J 1 \ - q- '. 1 111 I'7:•- . i \ \ ',,..10n.f..?ii:4::,.•...'1'. ..$...:,.....M.:ti:ii•:.:.,... 'y- 14 ht --••:_ -__ .. , 1 \ \, ,17.,.:Agg:' • i--`..::a••.:;ttt:::i. , ?,Elf --„.. • -Jo I "-- .;; \k . 1 r,K0:::::::::-• •4:::::-:::,...."."-. • lok"' I' •' \\ ''',.:,\\VNIP:...'111:20:iik,, iis,\\$, 41 ' I II 11-1 Cc] q" \ n- l'FPI-1'7'11---1:1-1 ,-----0, 1j!j'-. • 1, t, •NIk .O:0;i; ii;!!•.'.:aii::!•:!Cii&I;•:it"Imvuki% .' 1 1_1 lt •:)11j1 I:iLj-• bitilif....I": _if; 1 ' " • (7).ilkr".., :: • ..,;• 1 -% •:%"k '•!EiM,i;ii''....ii]'',.::''.•.7.•,.:!:!!!'!ii!].::i!!:ia::!::•••;!!!'' Tjav,,,,,ii lk ., _ ,34 ,, „. 2s, ..e % ‘ .\%-: %)1*:'''. .- ' - .7: .• •:..4. • )\---1.----• '• :•"":".7"--:..... ::_ --•)-.. 1..._-1,„4i_.,,,t.,k+331. -).t=',....__ •li 7:44- .-- - ..- 1 ''''\\ .'.'':iliwi:•' ...-----":441talk-.111p7p`,,.. ,-.1).-, NOP • --', NT, \ \\}q8 k .1-'•EJ1 , ..1,\ ..k. ,,‘ ti„;;;:e4i.-.,,_..,...4,,,,• ,0004t,„/,1pri .1• .. 7. • / 1,.. ... .1 j • ---.... 1 I 7-• % , , I It. it . i; ! 1 Its :[‘- ; ,.. IN . Vt.4if.A.:4:•i• '4"441taNWItALL%Mpti ': ;.1 I g.1i I _.,.___:_: :4 T ' fl '''1' L-I i .'ct.' i '--•-• ,L l't ---P‘T).0' __i• --- - )‘'fi in ./'/-*; --A_ri; \9::"'n; r • ll r* , \ `,T.ft":V.• /404;ii, • • II Fig' . .' I ‘‘ ,,,-- ---) 5m ‘-- • \ ' '''...! 1• J 1 - ' ,Thi!` L ....\, , • . ;;01'1 ....1. • J 11 ' •'-,' r7..-- - 10* ;-._ .-1-4' ..,5— • if.....v ;'.' . :•_i.„) ‘ •• kv\i‘iKiikt„4,--.46. -i.,..i-eitge...-.-- , V ; -,-•.--- •-•-• 1 L. ..? 1 ..„...... . , _i.r.wri•), :...e ,. ,, ...,....,...,..,. „,. , , \\ s.\ XIIIth,__NrrlftarliVri i! (-P I'I i , I ,...-•'r .. pi:, .1-- - 5 s.• b \ ./ -7 - _ 4'"'.). yo 1' • ' F g • ,„-a 0 \--- -• -\. \,1\ ...%:.• 4p4A:14..,147/14,44%,' ',i - ,saki.ns I 3.43;7.,•4••.•••0:3:1Pvt.e:-.1',T.Frio• t...3 III i ! ' "I.) •.1:i 03 • '. 1 %.' .i .' t--77/-*" j l'''- 4 -.• I 1 ,,-- .F1-1 §ett-a-..1kititnvevaz-z..ktaggp .4. \ ?-114,\• :\ .. ‘,.k-.1) I '146.\ bli,W/PtiNi .1...1k w L .4.). .--______O__;,.... -, v"" . :,•.I i ,:e''..----i-,"- 1 \ ' • • ' 4. 74 -itgl li'"illtan' 11P . I 11\lir4Y2:17C""" 1\ '1.,','s I ''' I/ i1C-F;L-4( 4' 0 g!.:;,,ge-5illig.A:-...ii.mmta•=e2g0 „ lh 1/41,,. -1...14 J " , `H . Dis.;; _4_, ..___,Ai , , ,-,„P, , -111- ti I, • • j••u: L C3' (/ c--e•I\ _,."", , • .• `. , •., I . 1•-" • ( -i, c. ,. .,,,,;../4A,04 )/ . Vikati:: \ ‘ li ,,) I.__•,s hi \ ;..\‘'...... ,_,,,ii, I', VI i • c:''' II--I,!.,. 0 ..,_ g"27 . . i ------'(.4'-''----'' ---; .: 1,37; \\\" \I'OrNVISC.440141"11'..\ ) 111 1 '' 1\‘. l''' .--.' i' ,4.- : 1 ' ..I ED I 1 IIEEF.. . EF.EcE .• e. 0 .-.1 \,.,1-,z- (TA,44§1,e''''Mjk‘Vll y::: 'CU j , til , i:1) • - ' i i •ib i 0,4 g g— ...„ ,%- •\ \IF44- ,z4-44,,;:li‘m,iv . • \ .0 ..<c,, , -1-- • I,'i , %'s \ •. ILI:::1 fz'- T-- g ;§. PP PPPPOPPPPP 3§4 Pd 131 \l'.1\. rn \,.\ ', '...ft, Izet&` Pekitpcileb.i: • it \ \ .L.; 04. • •' ,. '',-.0 mikva auceaRasms a 1 E t•-, .:.---,c`•••fs \ :', t, kr.g.k. Nigi,\4,3:01.4 . , .__ I•COIMID 1 ID . ,f.' ti 1 . 1 ,•-•:::: ;r ---. r Hr-r- . 0 \s W'LV4771:440.44k q44*1 ' ‘\ it) , -1, ) • '. (;"------ , la,/V/"...6 1 •).._-:i- ) ,Eu .i.- — 1_ __-, \ \ .11,7-444,,,,?./6,11P*10411 \ \\) 1 \ '''c- .-c,(,) Njik. I ' at'14'•(Ulli IR 4"i .:I '-- 1'a n. , 0 ..... foggs GEigrigsvi 8 ,•'•\ ', __2, ' \ _.___to rj,-.J'•.'_.\ . rs I.c-_ _p\.15 ;.•.___ .,1-•__,.q.r.'t..1r-A-J.,s ; 5— \\ \ \k\tsit-Altsiollc) \ ' b. - -- . )1---F.:Thic'f).--- . 11E:: Peclas2eals:: g6i40 j--\\. \ \ ,it, 1.ck :ce, 17 \;111:1. . ''. 7\t1 ‘!,:r,-k 0/ 1.1. lo ., IT :Iv / - '''''. 1,;PIO •;17 1 \ ,, 1 '14 k ' , i -.. •`• - . -,,, . • ,' ,... 4.n. .. \\,\ \, \,,,N0,,,,,,,,.... \ : ... - ..-z. i•,,i,o' ,9\ ,c,,::::,,0 •••- .X t,._.. .,,\ \\ 1.4*-.104,- ,,'-.,.... ' .1\ i ! i.,i ji,....Ix; ,.14,\\‘.....:i. --.. ,,., ';.„ ,ir . it., ---- 5i-g 56"-.11.2.AE•rit5 Sg' w '' 4 F ' N: ' \• \V V‘kl`l ; . .1. 4 ... 1; .\ "h' 'WI\IP \V4- ii a Le-;;'•- . ii23, p,,, )-.--r-,.,. --,--- ,•:?..< a i %La \ 43 :-" L;71, .1 1. '*-:1 • - I -12 - ..ft I I .. -•.. , ' \t%O.VNI III'111) e - , l-,61'5 55.1V;;;;i5 Igi 1 i ''''..' \ 44P4filkt#) 1%( , .‘ 1 . _ _j • , i ; i-'.:11, I___LI 0.'-ilti.1 \IN8 ; ) _IIII -- --.:1; / • AI' 41 51144i1 ' . ^ il 'A3• 1--.1 I 1 II. . ..2:1 \ , ...s, I 1 J 1• „, -r-1 \' \ 1‘ 44'Ai• . ,.lwAs,, 4,;.4.4,Nilli.t/;OM ...• C 1; . i\1.\•\11` , l• , 1 Pi i•*: ,cf:TLA.-„....,1 \ .•irhliti..Uk. II)). ' c to• \Ili,‘ k i-.Pp !! 4,1 ti 0,1*.'s c si I: , i ._____ U.:,; - .1... ,c 4 •IV • -',-- II 1' 1111,611Mg V k. \r k•• A1-•:,-•. ,•• .1 N•;!!‘.1S•,4, \ i'', • • \ 1:,k--4!...••:-10- 1 it 4;2 j....__.... • ,v, ‘1, •1•• i,"•-j cp.\‘ '.,‘ .•. 1._‘:,...\...,D YO,I;i 0 ...— . ......" ' \ti I ill+.71:241.71.0.41.:4-1 ‘2.. '.111- 1. .1 ._,.:-.7.... \'‘i\•....1 . \r , glitilltiiiDtfflekla : 1.' 1_ N_,.. ---.1 •• g j !'r' - • \ i \ -• i I . - (D GCl.ri C.AP•17'4 GO ' ClOr"PZ,^3Zi...0 . I I •1, tii 1010101(...&11 ill 4 1\ .•„,.,()\ s III\ \ -..--. - •!. .1 m•3000;14(11 LAKE W A SHINGTON ' Ill 111b, "Ile'- '1e,..4. ,. tsg\T,, i Li._r'. .. !V.422.4_3' ce,„.6 • • ,i ........,.. ik 1 -'..'I?! i\ \ !..:\ li •• 'a • ',: - I i -73 74 C/)1-...=+.1-+-,- • 'It a x i• , 7) •=r.."...F'..' .-,11 .. V).. '\\ --- ....''`i A R)<_ _ . ,c:s • ii, la.....c.A .?lin !:-..-._, \ , 4,),1\)i/..?_(..q••,‘,4 a..4 ..... \- , 7;1 • ' 21' 1;sp.:•5 , f„. (...:i-7-.) \I r . ...,.100,-< ---.,.. c..4.,0......•.,. iz, . - • --.-.-.• ..- /./0. 11 ..\ ••, Y,5 I. ' ( '\ " . 3 I '' ! !I' - --Pl.:•1 X)m•(n.4,_J-1,1)-3;./.1 sliuMATON No 1 a NO 2 • , I1,. :1., -- Z.%14 * II 0 0 ti •••-.. r-,1•:tri A .I • ' 1&_. (ea 0 '‘, n 1 1 --.,'.1 , \is\‘k .1 9 e lc .\,j:,,e''' ' • • 4.P0001'00° 0 3.11 • •—•" /Mi. 1 1's la '.:Z'-'31W-Alf40, \ l" —''a !I_ _ sz.- ___:.:_ ___ - . 7 __ !.,.. .-3t21,,1 .1 _ M Ail FisMtlgir'>. 'cl 0. ,. 120042.4;f9g. . , C tI, >05/1APi•j) . 1111(301 rI 1 1 uk- -air 0 • ,, Cn CZ O I + . OZttiiCIO tTI7 I • •" •1 I I-3 r8it;1112tri CO CZ M • ' • • cd cn tri co) 2 •tisno• zw ,• t•4.-10.-. 0 : . • • • . r-im0-31.P.,.„x2 .-14zr.....,; 0 • r•• . ...., • eqn, REvCrINS IlaTE (p OATE AuGusT 1989 DODDS ENGINEERS , INC . j )mok mill DESIGNED IL LEWIS DRAINAGE BASIN MAP CIVIL ENGINEERING SURVEYING PLANNING 44 sd......4. 02 9 --I DRAVVN IL LE%YIS . THE BLUFFS .-__... 6,„, 4205-14EITH AVE. SUITE 200 A tot/V..,,,..v.i. ,..,)f•4 APPROVED IL LEWIS ...- „..4. BELLEVUE,WASHINGTON 9E1007 . .. Y •:,'i . ' •2'''' . • 1.6,..0° ROY E.LEWIS,JIL,P.N.: 120E1 885-7877 OR 454-3743 \_______Ole/ .. , - '•'+6e...- 3) Parl_gafrIZN-AGER RENTON WASHINGTON ...... - I • . . . • . 1 . . 1 I I i \ , A . i \ • \ , A . • ‘ • , ‘s•...N...‘..''\'',•\‘.,:•:•\s.. s.1:.,':••'..\.. „:.\- \••••::•••• ......' __,I.11...._.!..-.(1-..._.-;/i• i.1•...••;' ,ii,,',,,,,,„ss:Iii!:.1:1 i! •1 \'•••'•••,\ , \•• •A‘.`‘,,.•-. , 1,,,•••..I , \;.i,; • ,. ••, • :;••• i.•%-',5... ••,•)I'•' VI; „ .\ \ \ )i 2: ..._ -•. %, : ;,,.;;; .1 (7•(// •• 7./ 1( ( N., •'.‘-.1.• ' ,,.1. ..••• •.• '. • `1. !.'• :!' • . ,-.. ))1) (1 I • F--r%'•-- •-• ..•:•:..;..‘.% ..' „, i ; ,, \ ....• • • i '.' \ • \ • : \-6".•••-• -:\\'••••%\ \' .7 ':' \ ' %API. i i:‘$\ / is,. •,, ...• -7.-- ---- ..' Vill Nt. :.• Nri+•' . ...Ili v......, ,:. -2. ...---.:- . •' ) i ...,,.:-•. ... . it:\- -': • . iii . .1. ,..•• ' (.:.(1.=...35 . ... %•. : 1$ 1 t. 'I f---- . \ A . • . . \\ 1 \ i ' ' - • - - -- ICI"' • -• % I " \. \i, ' '. 1• - . •-• --..: \i! ‘i 11 ,-•\ \. k . ..___ -- ---- N':-:•-..w.., . ,L . • . , , --.,.. • . , . • . ii,., . . . . \ ..,.,.,,. , . \ . -----. . I • .1 , ... • . . ---:-.-.:: :::::,:...i.--.:r„.7--..: 7.\._ ',...i... •....- '''')...:•-. .\•.:..i' 111':,1 : `.:! ! . 1 . A)•11 i,! I . • 1 1, ' r ?O. .. '-.', '71,, \ .'121.1 i 4 '".411 owlr, . ... .. ., ..., ..1.1, ,.... , : .,11 ., .,,, .,....... . .„. \ \ ,,, ,., , ,,,.! ,,, . ., \ --yst , :,1. •.i r /ii I .- ri, : • . v . ,, ,, , ,. : : / ., . , •,:\ ...,,, I ii.1.,1:• i;Ft • :\, :: :•!•1'11.:: ., % %, :.;\yij\11\1 ':!\ . \.\,, .:'::;. ' ' 1.. ' h' ! .: !Ili: • .' '' . ' .-r-.': .7':.ITi.: :. .....', :li .; ••••• '' \ • g 1. ....-------- , : .- • , • •Its , ,. 1 . .-,' • ,',: t •1\ ! HI.. ...,.... •'',:'. ., •. •••,.::: 1 •••.•• • •; ; • .*C'.,..':„10\',',,C,`A ‘,1.,:,, 1• • '''''AV4, ..------ , , • i,`•1; ,•,;_,•- . .,!•/: //:,..:* V• I, „ II), :. . . /• ' 1 • • . k//:•'??(•-• •-• '•• •/./ 0 g••• i'.•• --10 C,.:•,,,\'•,‘N,\ k.4 .,/'••• ' - • 'I I • ti •';, •//Doll ' • (-0 , 1 fIfi,'.••: . !' 1 ••14• 4•_. •• '.1 \ : / 44* * 0./- 1 , .ii ..1 ; i i. .I' ' -PI/ '! . 11 : .. 40, / \ - - •... 4 ' , 7. ''''''';''.„;'‘''','::::,':',,ci''‘,\:'‘ i I!. •••;1;I il 1 /1 . Ay/ / \1. ....-1 //1 i; • ;1 • 4 1,(//:::.• 0 '',. : ,,: i.;i 1 . , !I' *- ' . 1711. P,.. '1. i,i'./!..:.••••;;;LI.:111,(Vi',,./.:/:.;:./iiiii:If -,.:,‘,'''*:' :(.7_1 .. .\ V:, \$'4..,\ . "‘ .._ • 1.!i .1,i. •.;,• !, !i ' .. c., coc. r. y‘ •„.,`-i, • „. lekt„71\1 ;I.; i •, , :,. ..,1,. ri , v.e.li 4r .< . ,,\' .cI' , -Ac2Z..-:. .1r%\•..''..\,.• :• 0-4,114. \•.C.•k ....:.,:': ,'.....:,•-..;.,),,.•'1 • ,. ,..-- .\ •.•, dq 1, .\ . 1 i • -1:-- ''':cfc'900,‘"s:,1\\%'' ' ci IP , k.,-7'..:'. i •1•1.9- . ,, . .• , •, 1. :\ •(fl "I','IN S$\\ s‘\'4\, \ 'M -z \rdl.',%\'. V... • -p. , '', tit, .-..-.-•. • • Y‘ . .. ;:. ;• \. • i -2--- k, \ v,,,tvo, ' ‘-‘. . 4. • -x. . . ._V\ . A‘,..,:; ,-„,•;--, ,.) . ..-.,..-.;\ .. . _ •\,, , .,,„,;, t V,k .1). _al . c.). \ 1 i -1;-* VW V''' \ ‘`'V` c) c3' '' '' \ / 17‘ lOttqlgrZ. 1/1/1." 1/,'1....t'. /: , . .1. N• 'F.'. .., C° ...1 Nk MI',Vct\\ 1> 71\ 1.7.--;\ :. ''' •'' l'Oft ff••' •'•/'. .: / • \ •• . '•''''.L_ . ---A '`,.'.Vos;''WC,'rA Va‘ r- rt.% ' '•.2., ',,i ., \ ar f ':e ' // I tip.• / \ 1.1 ,' 0 ...V.'0,0;\\'.' li'c'i 7%. . , . .1 4... I IR 1' /r" : ' ' \' \ t• ''- . \ .ir%..: I.' .. /1 i.. , -*.1 . 1. ,..,I 1.1 . .i .''''''‘'''Irl, \ *': . 1> C1••`.„ ''' . T 4A/. /•' ' '' • :I., . \,,.-J : 1 .1 1 k CI ,Z1 •C. ' 'J 14 1.''-'---•-• ' •" -., 1 I i CiVI'l li\' \'/,Iti I,t Vt.C‘,,',Vr, 1. 713> M V T.1. '. '.. 1 •--.. '", ,-(,) .' ii; ."AVIXCCI\\ ' 0 •.\.: .; • 'i ° /I / .' ..../ .'' sl.s.CP V.: 1 i . 'x• 1> k-D....i. k , . / , •/ Aiki . Aiff *...;< ,. -- CD • '''s i• • A- '..,.. 4tr/ . -1 'Y'','':‘,,',\\0\... . , :s.,„..t. . ....• :... . , /la.• _ At ,A.: . 1 • lA vT,,,. . • /4.--,,e/ . ,I, ,.. \ .1 V : '`. 1( ''',,,, \,,,,,\ . \ '' '''''' . t414-44,11 ..V.,'• \ Li . '`.,:',V, c'',',(::ti,',,::',':til\,\ • i'' , / . ., "•,/4/ i 1.4 * .. ..j .\. I.1,.‘. . ...'-•.44 el, i ikii ...v\'• i .: 'I'. .,,,,r,;,„„,,,,t‘,,„:,,,,,Ax - ..----- - .• -)-tt . - Ill .v. - . '`-.\,:**1 1.- 1 ; •\ •, • vv,,,s,. nn.,,,,,,ncno . .., .41__, ,....... •• 17...i v\., , I ,„„: \ n v, \c,, . \ \....: .___\ 4, 0 . .. ...„ . . ..,;1 .. ..4 . Iv,,,A. , „ . i. c.:), ,„,,c,, , „oN gp;4;15t . • 4 t ,„, • ,.. ..x_ ,0„. ....., ......, . . 4 , z . • I, 4- cez MI \ \\ O '-'<• 1;*.A." ...,.•, -1414,41i : ' : 2..>.i.., \ \\,,,,w, '. k'', 1,1, , . -, .- -. 1 _:: ,. •(.• i 1 • -, ', ;V _. ,,• \ . •-•,c.-- ,i• ; I _ • . 1 of.' '' •..,...... •• •'• ‘42,. -. •,' • ''21 no> o . , MI k\,,`A\v.`.,:•:',V1YA ; ' ...vovi,:7_,,, N''•-••• 41,- N • ‘•. . '. \ . • , • • t:3 el 64 .9 t21 2 4 ni .,,,,,,,\,,ci,,,,.,,,„,,,,,\,, .Q. 7111111/tION N • .\ • Z . ;• ' 1..• 63 tTi pij 4 14 0 0 .1,,,\V'tY(.1.1.‘'c1\9 ,ci1,‘.,:y,, .. AD.: ' , --..,-. ,.. •.... i ,.,.,. E-400wa 0 ,A\ .:7•-::-- . \•-• • • . • . , t 1 Z....] p z p,, y AN* yew M et1 . 1.•A\ - 2 7 . • % VA.- -IN • • , 1 . .. .. El ° 0 CO Z 0 t•ii ill . • ,A - \1, . \ . (I) r,,,,, P,L--3,iRzIti/ cm ir Z D )c...iiq \11. .t , . .. . ..'. L 0 , . , . .z›.c. , • , • „1.t,c..,,n, . .. , . ... ., , . • „,, ,...„.., , I- ..ZOITItTM. .6, CI IX Cil Z 5/3[21 tA 2 p. r.. ,,;la,i . -.....„ . ,... . at000 z CA tri . m n,k • „rtiloqi3Oz: • , . , ..,--......,".„..1....,,...:'...111 rii • . • t, Z ,?.' . •ii.. • % tri > • , , . • • • I R y pATE_ AUGUST ly89 DODDS ENGINEERS , INC . .-' .. RP viSiONS OAT P, rilii OESIGNEO it.LEWIS STORM DRAINAGE EXHIBIT CIVIL ENGINEERING SURVEYING PLANNING al 00 ri .., ....... ZO-.1 -1 DRAWN R.LEWIS 4205-14EITH AVE.N.E.-SUITE 200 ,./Or ••• i APPROVED R.LEVVIS THE BLUFFS __ • . • , , . ., _, _ _ BELLEVUE.WASHINGTON 98007 ' 0 ., .. -n ItOY F.LEM S,JR.,P.E. - m --_ _-_...-- 12061E185-71377 OR 454-3743 .!. .. tOW.P.D --:-TIS :EY KiIiciali-- RENTON WASHINGTON .'•......--' - 1 • . ,• 1 RW41 1 • y iii • yLf p� ....---2 -...714,t 1rF • . ::4..u. ..........\ . • 1 *A ''OA ) • Sir • eo•• /2' CONC. CULVERT �" /.£.=45.21 \\:iii; 60LF® 0. /320 G • 0I.E. 37.30 V Z Q n GENE COULON • MEMORIAL BEACH PARK i i ci (SOUTH ENTRANCE) Z Q �' ] N ANGLE PO/NT'/N O N Z CHANNEL. EL.=33./ (n 0 a E g aZ z z clr WW j 2 0 • • TO LAKE.WASH/NGTON z N .ui II T Kth t'ORA/NAGS ('n' `1 j m CHANNEL _ 2 Z N Q p I le--CREEK • W w m N N� M t oZ 24 CMP OUTFACE=/5.8/ Om �'. TYPE // CB . m �j R/M=26.53 = U = ` 24"CAP I l56LFB 0.00/9 TOP OF STANOP/PE=/9.// mo rot 24.1.E. IN=-19.39(CUP) \ _ mm 24"/.E. OUT=/6.//(CMP) `� ` ` ` ` PIPE MATER/AL fIt CHANGES ma I t • s_ ` •_ 24'CMP 0 W v1 • mot • = j., .mom /.E.=26.68CC 2 ono (A mim 14 24'CUP• W CI) /6LF® 0.2856 Cli CULVERT Q PP •mo N Z mmi • • W.S.D.O. T. INLET AW/624.79EMI ki • 0c • 24"/.E. /N =23ki • .98(CMP) 0 24'I.E. OUT=23.93(CMP) E O mom mot �Y omit . a .i, z 0 . _ aI AT • a t!1 W mg3g • • • • W �• g 3 ° ff 0 /0 X 30 40 SO SHEET OF 1. REDUCED SCALE 1 1 PROJECT NUMBER •1 88139 THE BLUFFS PROJECT NARRATIVE The proposed Bluffs condominium residential community is an approximately 25 acre site locate between Lake Washington Boulevard and I-405 at approximately N.E. 16th Street. The property is currently vacant and consists of a wooded hillside. There are portions of the site which are designated as greenbelt area and contain steep slopes. The applicant is requesting a contract rezone from R-1 to R-3 in order to cluster the proposed residential development and minimize disturbance of the environmentally sensitive areas. The Bluffs proposal consists of 165 dwelling units contained in five buildings plus a recreation building and parking for 368 vehicles. The proposed total building floor area is approximately 214,500 square feet. The total lot coverage including buildings and paving is approximately 215,000 square feet, which represents about 22% of the site area. The buildings are designed to incorporate the architectural design elements of Coulon Park. Residential buildings are four stories. Two buildings contain underground parking. The proposed tower element of Building A is approximately 75 feet from the foot of the foundation to the top of the flag turret. Based on Renton's code definition relating to height the building height will be 50 feet. No off-site views will be obstructed by any buildings at The Bluffs. Primary vehicle access to The Bluffs will be from Lake Washington Boulevard. A secondary emergency limited access will be provided to the north and 160th Avenue S.E. PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF RENTON NOV 1 91992 THE BLUFFS CONSTRUCTION MITIGATION DESCRIPTION It is anticipated that the site construction at The Bluffs could potentially commence as early as June of 1993 . Building permit and utility design drawings will need to be reviewed and approved by the City prior to construction activity. Construction duration is estimated to last approximately 8 - 10 months and could be completed in the winter of 1993 assuming a June start. Construction timing will also depend on the availability of project financing. The initial site grading and utility phase of construction will occur first. This phase will occur in the summer months to avoid potential weather related problems. Once the earth work and utility phase is complete and all-weather roads built, framing could occur into the fall months. During construction, noise and dust control measures will be implemented to avoid off- site impacts. Hours of construction may be limited if required by the City. Hauling routes will be limited to Lake Washington Boulevard south of the northerly entry to Coulon Park. Impacts of construction related traffic on Lake Washington Boulevard will be minimized through appropriate traffic flagging, signage and street cleaning to avoid dust or mud. PtAi►NINN CiryOFREONN NOV191992 4 THE BLUFFS CONTRACT REZONE JUSTIFICATION The property which is the subject of this application is a 24.5 acre site located between Lake Washington Boulevard and I-405 at approximately N.E. 16th Street, in the Northeast Renton Comprehensive Plan area. The applicant is requesting a contract rezone from R-1 to R-3, together with approval for a 165-unit condominium complex to be known as The Bluffs. As more fully discussed below, the density proposed through this contract rezone is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan designation of low density multifamily on a large portion of the site, and development of the property as a contract rezone will allow maximum clustering of units to protect and preserve greenbelt areas and steep slopes on the site. With R-3 zoning and the proposed 165-units, only approximately 8.2 acres of the site would be developed, and the remaining 16.3 acres, or approximately 66.5 % of the site, which contain most of the steep slopes and greenbelts, would be preserved in undisturbed open space. The City of Renton required an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for this proposal, which analyzed potential impacts to traffic, water quality, earth, aesthetics, land. use, and other elements of the environment. This analysis will examine the impacts of this development proposal and suggest appropriate mitigation measures to insure both the protection of the environment and compliance with Renton's Comprehensive Plan and Policies. This property was last reviewed as part of the Northeast Renton Comprehensive Plan update in December 1981. The zoning on the property has been in place and remained unchanged since 1981, although authorized public improvements, permitted private development and other circumstances affecting the property have undergone significant and material change. In particular, the adjoining property to the west has been developed for high density multifamily use. With that development, improvements have occurred to the utility and transportation systems in the immediate area. Also, roadway improvements at the I-405/SR 900 interchange have increased the volume capacity in the area. Further, expansion which is continuing to occur at Boeing and PacCar has increased and continues to increase the local employment levels and further increase the demand for moderately priced housing in the area. The October 12, 1992 Cain & Scott Apartment Vacancy Report indicates that apartment vacancy rates have dropped below 5% in King County. Renton has experienced an overall current vacancy rate reduction since the first of the year. This indicates a need for moderate housing in the Renton area, which the proposed rezone and development proposal will help to satisfy. All of these changed circumstances warrant the requeste8UMWOnwmm4 the property. CITY O RENTON NOV 1 91992 The Renton Comprehensive Plan Land Use Element Map indicates four land use designations on the subject property: single family residential in the northeastern corner (approximately 1% of the site) , commercial ' at the southern end (approximately 14% of the site) , low density multifamily in the central portion (approximately 39% of the site) , and greenbelt in the northern, central and southern portions (approximately 45% of the site) . The proposed density under the contract R-3 zoning is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan designation of low density multifamily, and the proposed 165-units are lower than otherwise allowed in R-2, which would allow 12 units per acre or a total development density of 217 units, without clustering to preserve and protect greenbelt and slope areas. Also, the proposed density of 165 units is only approximately 6.7 units per acre, which is far closer to the R-1 density of 6 units per acre than to the permitted R-3 density. The proposed contract rezone will allow maximum clustering of units, thus protecting and preserving the greenbelt area and steep slopes, and minimizing site disturbance. Approximately 83 . 3% of the site will remain in open space. Contract R-3 zoning on this property would be in full compliance with all applicable Comprehensive Plan goals and policies, as more fully discussed below. The area at the southern end of the property which is designated commercial is not appropriate for commercial development for several reasons. The property is at the top of a steep bluff, isolated from other commercial areas and inaccessible for general commercial usage. Commercial development would also have far greater adverse traffic impacts than multifamily development, would result in more impervious surfaces, and would require the removal of more vegetation,. The environmentally sensitive features of the site could not be protected and preserved to the extent possible with multifamily development. Multifamily development is thus a more appropriate use of the site and would be significantly more compatible with surrounding residential uses. Further, development as single family lots under either the existing R-1 zoning or R-2 would have a far greater impact to the site with road and utility extensions than the clustered approach possible under the proposed contract R-3 zoning. Under R-2 zoning, the only permitted structures •of more than 3 dwelling units are townhouses, which would result in far more site disruption, more of the site developed, and more areas in impervious surfaces. Under the proposed contract zoning for The Bluffs, large amounts of undisturbed open space will be preserved, which will serve as both wildlife habitats and a visual buffer. Substantial amounts of natural vegetation on site will be retained. Special consideration will be given to the handling of storm water runoff. The storm drainage systems will incorporate natural drainage features where possible. Extensive geotechnical information has been provided in the EIS to ensure sound engineering practices related to the slopes and soils on the site. The site design was developed to minimize the amount of earth disturbance. 2 This property is located in an urbanized area of the City. It is vacant and completely surrounded by fully developed transportation corridors and residential uses, and immediately adjacent to the I-405 freeway. It has access to arterial streets and convenient freeway access. The site is in close proximity to major employment centers, including Boeing and PacCar, which minimizes the commuting distance for residents of the project and reduces adverse traffic and transportation impacts associated with long commuting distances. It is the ideal location for people to live in affordable housing close to work places, thereby avoiding further overcrowding of the City's streets. The proposed development will provide increased affordable housing opportunities for the neighborhood. The proposed low density R-3 zoning will provide a logical buffer or transition area between the I-405 freeway to the east, the high density multifamily and mobile home uses to the northwest, and the existing single family neighborhood to the north. The entire northern greenbelt area of approximately 5. 0 acres will remain undeveloped, which will provide even greater buffering and a better transition to the single family area to the north. The proposed density is entirely in keeping with the low density Comprehensive Plan designation on the property, is more appropriate than commercial zoning, and will enable the preservation and protection of environmentally sensitive features on the site, which would not be possible under lower density or commercial zoning. The visual impact of the proposal on the surrounding area will be minimal. The difference in topography, elevation and the extensive screening provided by the natural vegetation to be incorporated into the development will ensure compatibility with the surrounding area and uses. The location of dwelling units has been planned to take advantage of site vistas, and consideration will be given to the City trails goals of providing public pedestrian access. The building arrangement, the physical location and the architectural design of this project will make it the highest quality multifamily project in the area, which will be a definite asset to the neighborhood and the City of Renton. The proposed contract rezone complies with Renton's codes and objectives. It will preserve the natural characteristics of the land, including topography, native vegetation and views; will reduce the risks of construction in environmentally sensitive areas; will preserve wildlife habitat; and will best utilize the potential of special features of the site while at the same time maintaining substantially the same population density and area coverage permitted in the zone. The condominiums will be constructed in only five 4-story buildings plus a recreation building, which allows the retention of far more open space than would traditional development of the site. The 3 Bluffs primary purpose is to limit development to the developable areas of the site and preserve maximum amounts of open space and natural areas. In The Bluffs, 16. 3 acres of the site will remain in a natural undisturbed condition, substantial amounts of native vegetation will be preserved, very little construction will occur in steep slope areas, the project has been designed to best utilize view and other potentials of special features of the site and will not obstruct any views, and the proposed density will be less than that permitted in the zone. The proposed rezone also responds to the ordinance goals which encourage development of housing types compatible with adjacent uses and beneficial to the community; which encourage the development of a viable housing stock that enhances the image of the City; which encourages the creation and preservation of usable open space for recreation and aesthetic enjoyment of residents; and which encourage creativity in design. The clustered dwelling units and retention of large amounts of open space and buffering areas will be compatible with adjacent uses and will contribute to the stock of affordable housing to enhance the image of the City. The majority of the site will be preserved in usable open space, extensive on-site recreational facilities are planned for the residents of the project, and the applicant is willing to work with the City in providing a public trail through the site. More than the number of required on-site parking spaces will be provided at The Bluffs. As a result of the fact that the property is not served by transit and there is no on-street parking in the vicinity of the property, it is necessary to ensure that sufficient on-site parking is available. This complies with the development standard which calls for adequate vehicular parking areas. The applicant has determined that the additional on-site parking is the amount necessary to meet the demand for adequate on- site parking. Much of the parking will be provided below grade, which will eliminate additional impervious surfaces associated with surface parking areas. The proposed contract rezone will provide several benefits to the City, including the protection of environmentally sensitive areas; the preservation and enhancement of natural features of the site which the City could not obtain under existing zoning; the provision of needed moderate income housing near employment centers; and a design which is superior to that which would result without a rezone in terms of increased provision of open space and recreational facilities, location and screening of parking facilities, superior landscaping and superior architectural design, placement, relationship and orientation of buildings. The proposal is compatible with surrounding uses (the property abuts multifamily to the west, a freeway is to the east, commercial zoning is to the south, and significant open space will be provided to the north) , 4 provision of adequate streets and pedestrian facilities (including a public trail) , provision of adequate services (all utilities and services are available to this urban site) , an appearance of openness (over 66% will be open space) , creation of a quality environment, provision of internal privacy (there will be total privacy) , enhancement of views (no views will be obstructed and excellent views will be provided) , promotion of variety and innovation in site and building design, and all other criteria. The proposed rezone complies with all applicable Comprehensive Plan Goals, Objectives and Policies, as set forth in the March 1986 City of Renton Comprehensive Plan Compendium. Adequate transportation capacity and utilities necessary to serve the proposed development are available, the development will be compatible with the natural and human environment, and it will compensate for the services it requires (General Goals, Balanced Development Objective and Policies) . Natural vegetation and slopes on the site will be preserved to retain open space, and extensive open space will be incorporated as an integral part of the development (Open Space Objective and Policies) . Natural vegetation and healthy trees will be retained over much of the site through clustering of dwelling units, and unique and/or fragile areas on the site will be retained (Vegetation Objective Policies 1 through 3) . The superior storm drainage system for the project will control runoff and improve runoff water quality levels and will incorporate appropriate design and equipment to ensure clean runoff (Surface Drainage Objective and Policies) . Slopes on the property will be protected and preserved (Slopes Objective and Policies) . The requested contract rezone and proposed development particularly respond to the Urban Design Goal, Land Development Objective, which calls for growth and development to occur in a timely and logical progression of the existing urban area to maximize the use of existing services. Land Development Objective Policies also specify that vacant land surrounded by development land and land where adequate public utilities are available should be given priority for development. The project site is currently vacant in a fully developed area. Public utilities are available to serve the site. Therefore, development of the site is timely and logical, and consistent with these policies. The proposed development will provide a suitable housing and living environment, will contribute to housing densities and types to suit a variety of family sizes, age groups, life styles and income levels, will maintain views, and access, utilities and community facilities are available to serve the project (Residential Goals, Neighborhoods Objective and Policies) . 5 The highest quality of design, construction and maintenance is planned, as well as energy conservation features, and the buildings are designed to take advantage of views, site character and other amenities (Housing Quality Objective and Policies) . The density and location of buildings has been planned to take into consideration natural features, the character of the area, community facilities, utilities and transportation facilities; all urban utilities and community facilities are available; the site is located near arterial streets; the development will provide a buffer between differing land uses; the property is located near employment and shopping centers; and the proposed rezone and development of this property would provide for efficiency of access, utilities and open space (Housing Density Objective and Policies) . The proposed development will have a minimal impact on the site and will be compatible with the surrounding area (Impact on the Area Objective) . Setbacks in the proposed development are adequate to preserve views, allow maximum exposure to light, maintain air circulation, promote privacy and provide functional areas (Impact Objective Policy 2) . Architectural design and construction will be compatible with the site and adjacent areas; the site plan provides efficient and functional use of land with attractive design; significant natural features will be preserved and incorporated into site development; and extensive additional screening and landscaping is planned (Impact Objective Policies 1 through 7) . The proposed development will include private and possible public trails to connect to off-site community facilities, which will be located to take advantage of views and other site amenities (Trails Objective) . The proposed development will comply with the Utilities Goal and all Objective and Policies which call for adequate storm drainage facilities which minimize the impacts on natural drainage features, and which are designed to provide for safe collection and discharge of runoff. The development will include extensive passive and active on-site recreational facilities (Community Facilities Goal, Parks Objective and Policies) . The proposed development generally complies with the Greenbelt Policies, including retention of most of the steep slopes as undisturbed open space, clustered development, and the use of sound engineering and technical knowledge. The requested rezone and proposed development also complies with all applicable Area Specific Policies for Northeast Renton, including Land Use Objective Policy 1, which specifies the land use decisions within the Northeast Quadrant should be consistent with available transportation, community facilities, and utilities; Commercial Development Objective Policy 5, which specifies that multiple family residential uses should be encouraged as buffers between 6 commercial uses and less intensive uses; Utilities Objective Policy 1, which specifies that the availability of sanitary sewers should be a prerequisite for new land development; and Utilities Objective Policy 8, which specifies that areas designated greenbelt should be considered critical areas for storm drainage purposes. The requested contract rezone to R-3 and the proposed 165- units are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan designation and policies, and is an entirely appropriate and environmentally sound use of this property, which is in a fully developed urbanized area, immediately adjacent to a major freeway, and in close proximity to major commercial activities, particularly employment centers, as Boeing and PacCar continue to increase the work force. Expanding residential and commercial development in the vicinity of the property have over time made it less suitable for development under either R-1 or commercial zoning. More importantly, contract R-3 zoning will allow a development at a low density, while enabling the preservation and protection of environmentally sensitive features on the site, which would not be possible with development under either R-1, R-2, or commercial zoning. For all of these reasons, the applicant requests that the contract rezone to R-3 for The Bluffs be approved. 7 ,.. , _ ' ' •„,r . ....,,. s... . • \ >• \\\\\\\\.....\ :\s \ Childrerts.',.,\: \ < -..... <\. \:•,, \.s1Dine. ,X" *:: "...;' ?. -1 R-1 ..............,,.,.: \., s \ i f \ \,.. .. . \ Single t Y .: - • :. : ,.. R-1,, ,...., , • \ .. ,....---..... '.. IV Homes-Z"— 0 ' ‘ s A S ss N...24.17..st, „,„ . uj ................-......-..... r . , \\'• \-\ ''', R-3 \ i ', " , ,, vs---\,. - . ,,,,,— ••. ,.st \ i% \ Mobile \ \ cc .........,.....................„ . ‘Home . \ ••• s :••,. Park • \ 1 NolpI •1 ea ...,..... • \ A \-,. 1 ) ? i,55 s, % ...,..,.,.-..„„„:. .... :i N 1 Marina % 1 s -1 •Landing % 5)i• :.,.*:':'". 1 i . Apartments 1 ( .!,‘,Y.:..................... L,::.;,.......y:::::::.:-.. . -t. . ';. •••••••.. ..,. ...., 0. , 1 ss •:.•"-/-: :. ''\•\.\\\-, Ei s i i. .: A.,f(/ .. -..... . •• .? — 4 • k :.V \‘'''...• i i k ; \.,\\., I SITE ..1 s-: :‘\ • 'N.- ico.• LEGEND ::, f 1 . 1,'"-": ‘••• I 0. Symbol DISTRICT USE --‘ .‘,.... : a! - I G-1 General-Single-Family ' s. k\ - ses . - 1 .....,.., 1 < 1•:. k - tel: ...j., i R-1 Residential-Single-Family -1 1 R-3 Residential-Muttiple-Family °a•ric-.:.•\ *..•. )' ..i :-..c.• '13-1'• 1 1?-3 ::.. s • R-4 Residential-Multiple-Family Entrance -'•: :. ; • 'NI,.••-•s. ,: :1:,• ::*•,-; • 14 1 , , \ a . B-1 Residential-Business Use e;; ::- •::ra /A 'sc.-A i 1 ; • :• p-i Public Use i. '::. ::;•:. -144:1,..,....•::, -,... a f 1 i . ! H-1 Heavy Industrial • .•: ',..I .!:..',. \ , . .... ,-: /1.GENE f-.. . . A North - •- .1 s":" ..:........... I ••*',COW-ON .:',. , • , ... i. (MEMORIAL •••.•. . - :s: ' d 1 \ ./ ,........„.........,......,.:.:........... • ..:::::..., r , ,,:....,.. : BEACH PARK ,........ ,, 1 i R-4 P-1 Park ! /7 //•• . ... Entrance • . / •,... , :`' _, ... El:E::'•i:{:: 1 s:::,.z.,.....r,..///., H-1 I i . •„ , . ,,. • PLANNING DIVISION 1 CITY OF RENTON NOV 1 9 1992 . - i Zoning and Surrounding Uses Map ! ! ��� :E•• DI I O ::;;»::>:>:�>;:�:<:»»>:�<<:::::>:<�>::>:::<:>:<:»::::»::>::>::>>:«:« ::>:«::::DEVEL �:P•MENT::S:E : �IIC 5 S. ... .................... . ...................................................................... ..::::.::::::::::::::.:::::..::::::::::::::::::::.:::::..:::. ...................................................................... . . MaS�' R; APPL1: • ........... EXISTING US E(S): US S ::`IJote ::lf:�#here:is>Yrio�efh�ari one�le`al:owne�. I a .attach. n . :>:i:add''ifionai:�iiota�ized>tvlasCer a licafion f r acli�:own r . Vacant parcels. Kirkman, Cooke, Lotto/Segur, NAME: Matsouka, Martindale ADDRESS: See attached. EXISTING ZONING: CITY: ZIP: R-1 PROPOSED LAND USE(S): • TELEPHONE NUMBER: Attached multi-family residential dwellings. ... ....................................................................................................... .......................................................................................................... ................................ .......................................................................... CONTACT>P:ERS:ON/APRLI:CANT:> >>< NAME: Colin Quinn PROPOSED ZONING: • Quinn—Webb & Associates R-3 ADDRESS: 16031 — 119th Place N.E. SITE AREA;(SQ.FT. OR ACREAGE): CITY: ZIP: 22.6 Acres. Bothell WA 98011 • PROJECT VALUE: TELEPHONE NUMBER: 362-2728 • .. ... ....... . .... .. ................ .......... .... ....... .... ... .. .......................... ......................................................................................................... _ .......................................................................................................... .......................................................................................................... IS THE SITE LOCATED IN AN ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE <PRO.J:ECTINFO.R�MAI"I O:N:<�> » > � .. .... . . ....... ... ... ... ......... AREA? • See Bluffs E.I.S. PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAME: • The Bluffs • IS THE SITE LOCATED IN AN AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA? PROPERTY/PROJECT ADDRESS(S)/LOCATION: �,�AJPIIN�DIVI�101`I ��(®FR��'D� See Bluffs E.I.S. East of Lake Washington Boulevard. East of Coulon Park 9 `1992, • KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER(S):Nod IS THE SITE LOCATED IN THE SEWER'M9RATORIUivM,ARE:A? See attached. t ' No. ?' `/- Wit( �i: AA��ler 7/00 e .::::::::::::: : : .. :. . .:a I.. : .I.s cat...o n:. .... .e.s..: h.a .: ... :1....:::..C.).,. s f.w��. .:: ....:... ...:? :...,.::.:..:.:..::..::..:...:.::...::... .:.:..::.::,.:: SUBDIVISION: ANNEXATION $ g REZONE • S' ;",' LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT - $ SPECIAL PERMIT $ TEMPORARY PERMIT $ _SHORT PLAT $ —CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT. -- -- $ . _TENTATIVE PLAT $ X SITE PLAN APPROVAL $ 1,.::/-..� _PRELIMINARY PLAT $ —SPECIAL PERMIT $ _FINAL PLAT $ -GRADE & FILL PERMIT $ — (NO. CU. YDS: ' ) . VARIANCE $ PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT $ - (FROM SECTION: ) WAIVER $ - ROUTINE VEGETATION _ PRELIMINARY — MANAGEMENT PERMIT .$ _FINAL BINDING SITE PLAN $ - - 1 SHORE TINE REVIEWS: • MOBILE HOME PARKS: $ • SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT $ _ _ TENTATIVE _CONDITIONAL_ USE $ - _PRELIMINARY _VARIANCE . $ _FINAL • ' EXEMPTION $ No Charge REVISION • ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW $ 1 ................. .............. . . ; ty::staff : ' :. .. .. ..:. . < : ii: : :. : ::::::;:�::>::> i:>::r >;::>:<::::<::: ::;:::<::�i:::i::::>::>::>;:::>:s <:�`:?:"::?':<�'�:':Il l ':SeetIOn::tOb.e:::com le ed b ..:.. .. ....<:.. >.. ... . .<. ... . -. ............ ..... -;:T07AL�Ef=S-.;;: :.�::: : :::..:..:.�:.�:$�: ::::::.:::::::::::::::::::::::: ..1':O.TAL.;PqSTAG :: ::: ::::�........................;:::.;:.;:.:.>:;-;::;-::<-::-:.::::::�:.:::.; ......... .. .. . N m r........ ... :..-..::. ..,.::.::...::..::..::..::...E.�: :�A: .:<FIB::�;:SHPL ;CU > [LA:>�;P:P.........................:...:.-.:.-.-:...�.:::.:�.�:.::.. : :�ItyFilei . be:....:.......Q. ...�1..................-:...-:.:G:.:.::.......,.. ..... :�.;� :.> . .::..:...:::. . :: .:::. :.:::_:. : :::::<::::::::: ;<.:. ;:::V::::. . b....W....FEUD.;>V.F?UD ..SM; SME PMHP F,MF{P ::gS.............. .................:.::.:x:::::.�.:::. FID vI W N ER H C : PN , >I N G� T ><� I, Colin Quinn ,declare that I am (please check one)XX the authorized representative to act for the property owner, the owner of the property involved in this application and that the foregoing statemi>i is and answers herein contained and the information herewiffi submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Furthermore,should my application require City staff time in excess of the average/basic time frame(s)established by City of Renton Ordinance#4322, I hereby agree to compensate the City of Renton for any and all extra labor and ni nlabor costs incurred to accomplish the review and processing of this land use application. / OF CRI AND ' 19 OR BEFORE ME THIS AY OF 19 NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR Thj STATE OF WASHINGTON, RESIDING AT: I ("----20. e...:_.) . r.7(). - -•l• Y2..--'. ''• ' -. '' (Name of Owner/Represent ive) ' - Colin Quinn, Representative- - - - ;< :::-11,4,-.,.'„ii ./1,7/------ See attached. iglt, uie of;NotarY:<<:abii (Signature of Owner) Master 2/92 Page 2 ,.;:.:� r;:•:.:�.:::;.: :�:�.::<::.:>;:.:;;::::>•:>•>::>::;:•�;:;•:.;: I--E ►L DESCRIPTION OF PROF tTY • kp:' .r ':: ..:.::' ` : , :-::.::•.::• <> ::,. ::: if more s ace is:rC uired,' lease attach a sC agate sheet). • l'b LOTS 352 AND 353, C.D. HILLMAN'S. LAKE WASHINGTON GARDEN OF EDEN DI.V!SIoN NO. 5, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 11 OF PLATS, PAGE 83, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; . EXCEPT THAT PORTION THEREOF CONVEYED TO KING COUNTY FOR NEWPORT—RENTON ROAD BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 1036529'. • ALL SITUATED IN THE S W a OF :SECTION 5 TOWNSHIP 23 N RANGE 5 E_W_M • • I, Ng , *, 6,i/1 05 i7C . , being duly sworn, declare that I am (please check on::) _ the authorized represents '‘fc to act for the erty owner, ✓the owner of the property involved in this application aid that the foregoing statements an iLras, ercin contained and the information herewith submitted are in all ccspects li:a-, and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. . • SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS /l4 DAY OF J tt,,� •19 go - • • NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR THE STATE OF • WASHINGTON, RESIDING AT: �s3a i.41it GOA- ...._Lif___ ,,, / . •it • fin:".. : — Z__ .../z:_, /6_-.Aw--_=,:k.1!;41(-7_ .9 (Name of Notary Public) (Signature of Owner) /•s.?tin ic=,r 1"` „e. �.«sr.•.sa�.A; ,30EXHIBIT A - Legal Descriptions - KIRKMAN 1 . POR OF R/W 200 FT . IN WIDTH, DELINEATED ON C.D. HOLLMANS LK WASHINGTON GARDEN OF EDEN DIV NO 5 AS C 8 P S P R R LY BTW N LN OF TRACT 318 OF SD PLAT PROD WLY R• N LN OF TRACT 350 OF SD PLAT TO W LN OF SD HWY . vo 2 . LOT 319 HILLMANS LK. WN GARDEN OF EDEN 415 FOR WLY OF ST HWY 2-A FOR OF PACIFIC COAST R/W ADJ ON W 3 . LOT 320 HILLMANS LK WN GARDEN OF EDEN #5 LY WLY OF ST HWY NO 2-A TGW POP. OF PC R/W IN SW 1'/4 OF SEC 05-23-05 ADJ LY BTW N & S LNS SD TR 320 PROP WLY 4 . LOTS 321 -322 HILLMANS LK WN GARDEN OF EDEN •#5 POP WLY OF SEC '?) ST HWY #2-A TGW POP OF P C R/W IN SW 1 /4 OF SEC 05-23-05 ADJ LY BTW N & S LNS SD TRACTS 321 & 322 , 14 . LOT 348r HILLMANS LAKE WASHINGTON GARDEN OF EDEN, RENTON WA rss b3 ` 6. Lot 351 ^ s . n ■ ■ 7. One-half adjacent road right-of-tsar wherever jointing above properties • • ALL SITUATED IN-THE S W 4 OF SECTION 5 TOWNSHIP 23 N "RANGE 5 E W M "T IE MATSUOKA LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS Block 344, C. D. Hillman 's Lake Washington Garden of Edens, Division No. 5, according to plat thereof recorded in Volume 11 of Plats, page 83 , records of King .County, Washington. - ALL SITUATED IN THE S W 1 /4 OF SECTION 5 TOWNSHIP 23 N RANGE 5 E W M . • I I _ /e/A • • • LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Tract 334 , Hillman' s Lake Wash- ington Garden of Eden Division #5, LESS State Highway #405 (Tax Lot #0260) 0. 95 acre . L.� $1- ` r Tract 335 , Hillman' s Lake Wash- " '�cuf ington Garden of Eden Division #5 , LESS State Highway #405 (Tax Lot #0270) 0 . 15 acre . _,; Portion of Pacific Coast Right of Way lying South of the South line of Tract 333, Hillman' s Lake Washington Garden of Eden CDivision #5 , Prod.' West and North of South line of Tract 336 Q: of said Plat prod. West in Section 5 , Township 23 North, Range CV 5 East , W.M. , in King County , Washington; LESS State Highway M #405 (Tax Lot #039) 04 . 24 acres,. That part of the following des- cribed Parcel "A" lying Westerly of a line drawn parallel with and 180 feet Westerly, when mea- sured radially , from the Line Survey of SR 405 , Renton to Kennydale. PARCEL "A" That portion of the Pacific Coast Railroad Company''s right of ~\ ' way in Section 5 , Township 23 North, Range 5 East , '`W.M. , lying I ""1" a, ' 0 ' between the North and South lines of Third Avenue , extended to c�i West, as shown on C. D. Hillman ' s Lake Washington Garden of �'� Eden Division #5 , as per plat recorded in Volume 11 of Plats on ) Page 83, records of King County (Tax Lot 1/47 ) 0. 11 acre . ALL SITUATED IN THE S W a OF SECTION 5 TOWNSHIP 23 5•1f5 c 2E S NRANGE5 EWM 1 • • • • a • • • • AFFIDAVIT • Toru Matsuoka , being duly sworn, declare that I am (please check one) the authorized representative to act for the property owner, X the owner of the property involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herin contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge-and belief. SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO WORE ME THIS la DAY OF G ---, 19 90 c oil8fo :N NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR THE STATE OF ' `o�u�l�t� o' WASHINGTON, RESIDING AT: :,0 ' kn,';S`` 420.403 -- s� qg' L 51.1. /5SAotrAil, . .;Zt eae'V v//c c- (Na a otary Public) (Signature of Owner) • J•v2/1/3 4(fzfA s (Address) (Address) (City/State/Zip) (City/State/Zip) • 3 (Telephone) (Telephone) Acceptance of this application and required filing fee does not constitute a complete application. Plans and other material required to constitute a complete application are listed in the "Application Procedure." RtnMastr Revised 5/89