Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLUA84-098 BEGINNING OF FILE FILE TITLE 44---. .. MICROFILMED 098 _ ; , fo„ii. yy J ,•{: .!i,�l- - :j ,s ti`^i1i ,r�'�;k,.'ar;4' ;r?,;�'�c;_ ':i;�,:'l a'.. ' .i'' 1 '�i. � ..,t ,�3,n.r �1�"�,S :"i .e`•/{ 4:. ,4{,t.. �t: it, ;r ,'wl.p"' „df:,;. '•1i+ ,Ni.' ',• • ,1.:•`.'.�% ;'r:`,4 - i..�+..it''it "i i < r , � ,1 i ';y - `ir�A 4`�. o,: � a'i� s 1 o '.'xn, 'r'. r '-•�r t ., � y , J ; � ' gi.°'�` • ,i ,•Y 'u''.;:' < }±,.il. .4 �k .'a' .,or ,ti A 6 , .;i rf^,l VYL • 1.• ni' . II • i.,c yy 666j .. n�, M I CHAEL DONNELLY q, Applicant `s'.1 .' File No. R-098-84 v. Project Name A,1 ;Iv'. Property Location 636 Shattuck Ave. So. '4" HEARING EXAMINER: Date Hearing: 11/20/84 - Decision: 11/30/84 , ,. • '., • �,t' Recommendation Approval with signing of Restrictive k; , Covenants i(i<f :a, Req./Rec. Date Received Date Response 0 ;, Appeal - Date Received 11, Council Approval - Date .•, • Ord i Hance/Reso 1 ut ion # ` RD4 )I Date�Y/ 11`�c ws; Mylar to County for Recording • , My l a r Recording # S jai.!. Restrictive Covenants to be filed before ' Remarks: €;, ' final City Council Action. `����� nr�r W n. t���z ail(, �-- wi,_ • ,..„ ,,,,, .. , „,, ,,„ . r, • r, s.s.t.a. . . . ,..,..„, . •,..• . . . i;,,,, ' • , . . ,,,,.,,,,,, . . 4t,,,,.. . . . ______ • .___ .i., i • 14<it�' / Ii i.i • itti Y,,1 OWi r ,JkLj��: ' .� ' • yi' OF RA,A �► THE CITY OF RENTON U ,$ 'G z MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH.98055 cii "� BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR • MAXINE E.MOTOR, o9Ao cl CITY CLERK • (206) 235-2500 9�TF0 SEPZEM# February 15, 1985 Mr. Michael Donnelly 636 Shattuck Avenue So. Renton, WA 98055 • Subject: City of Renton - Ordinance No. 3888 Donnelly Rezone Dear Mr. Donnelly: At it regular meeting of February 4th, 1985, the Renton City Council adopted Ordinance No. 3888 changing the zoning class- ification of certain properties in the City from Residence District (R-4) to Business District (B-1) . As a condition of the rezone, restrictive covenants were filed with King County Records and Elections under Receiving Record- ing No. 8501210374 . Copies of the ordinance and covenants are enclosed. Sincerely, CITY OF RENTON Marilyn J. Petersen Deputy City Clerk ' Enclosures cc: Hearing Examiner CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON J ORDINANCE NO. 3888 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF CERTAIN PROPERTIES WITHIN THE CITY OF RENTON FROM RESIDENCE DISTRICT (R-4) TO BUSINESS DISTRICT (B-1) (DONNELLY R-098-84) WHEREAS under Chapter 7, Title IV (Building Regulations) of Ordinance No. 1628 known as the "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton" , as amended, and the maps and reports adopted • in conjunction therewith, the property hereinbelow described has heretofore been zoned as Residence District (R-4) ; and WHEREAS a proper petition for change of zone classification of said property has been filed with the Building and Zoning Department on or about 27th day of September, 1984 , which petition was duly referred to the Hearing Examiner for investigation, study and public hearing, and a public hearing having been held thereon on or about November 30, 1984 , and said matter having been duly considered by the Hearing Examiner and said zoning request being in conformity with the City' s Comprehensive Plan, as amended, and the City Council having duly considered all matters relevant thereto, and all parties having been heard appearing in support thereof or in opposition thereto, NOW THEREFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I: The following described property in the City of Renton is hereby rezoned to Business District (B-1) as herein- below specified; subject to the findings, conclusions and decision of the Hearing Examiner dated November 30 , 1984 ; the Building and Zoning Director is hereby authorized and directed to change the -1- ORDINANCE NO. 3881, maps of the Zoning Ordinance, as amended, to evidence said rezoning, to-wit: • See . Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof as if fully set forth herein. (Said property located at 636 Shattuck Avenue South) AND SUBJECT FURTHER to that certain Declaration of Restrictive Covenants' executed by Petitioner-Owners on or about February 9 , 1985 and recorded in the office of the Director of Records and Elections Receiving No. 8501210374 and which said Covenants are hereby incorporated and made a part hereof as if fully set forth. SECTION II: This Ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval and five days after its publication. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this 4th day of February, 1985 . Maxine E. Motor, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this 5th day of February, 1985 . .i0O.AbC.4114, Z&Ln..po c*. Barbara Y. Shinpoch, Mayor Approved as to Form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Date of Publication: February 8th, 1985 -2- ORDINANCE NO. 388- • EXHIBIT "A" LOTS 10 AND 11, BLOCK 6, SMITHERS FIFTH ADDITION TO THE TOWN OF RENTON, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 16 OF PLATS, PAGE 33, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTOIh. • • • -3- Renton City Council 2/4/85 Page four Old Business continued Community Sister City Participation (6/25/84) - The Committee reviewed Services Committee a report from the Administrative Intern which outlines the Sister City history of the City's current Sister City Program and offers Participation alternative policies to guide the program in the future. The Committee felt they should gauge public support and interest in the program before considering a request to expand the City's involvement. A letter was sent to 14 public service and community groups in the City asking for an expression of interest or a willingness to participate in the sister city effort. Only two organizations responded and both stated that they could commit an individual to serve on the committee but could not provide financial support. Continued Based on this limited response, the Committee recommended that the Council adopt the following policy relating to the Sister City Program: In order to focus attention on our existing Sister City Program and avoid competition for limited public and private funds, Renton shall concentrate activities and support exclusively on our current Sister City, Nishiwaki , Japan. The City shall maintain a policy which requires that the total responsibility for that organization, communications and funding to support the Sister City Program rests with a private sponsor group and not with the City of Renton. Cable TV Completion of Cable TV System Construction (Referred 7/2/84) - System Completion Since the City's cable consultant is scheduled to provide a report to the Committee of the Whole this month, the Committee recommends that this issue be ,addressed at that time and that no further action is required at the sub- committee level . King County King County Youth Services Funding Letter (Referred 10/15/84) - Youth Services A letter was written to request the results of the hearing Funding on this issue. Information will be shared with Council when received. No further action is required. MOVED BY KEOLKER, SECONDED BY CLYMER, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE COMMITTEE. CARRIED. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS Ways and Means Ways and Means Committee Chairman Clymer presented a report Committee recommending the following ordinances for second & final reading: - Ordinance #3886 An ordinance was read providing for appropriation and transfer Golf Course of funds to the golf course fund to provide for general Fund Transfer operation in the total amount of $492,428.00 from Unanticipated Revenues: Golf Course Green Fees, . Investment Interest, Concessions; and Contingency Fund - Operating Transfers-Out, Cumulative Reserve Fund #2104 (Park Equipment) and Water and Sewer Utility Fund - Operating Transfers-Out to Golf Course Funds - Operating Transfers-In. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY REED, COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. Ordinance #3887 An ordinance was read amending a portion of Section 1-4102 Comprehensive Plan of Title I (Administrative) of City Code relating to fees and Zoning Map Fees for Comprehensive Plan Compendium and Zoning Maps. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY HUGHES, COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. Ordinance #3888 An ordinance was read changing the zoning classification of Donnelly Rezone property located at 636 Shattuck Avenue South from Residence District (R-4) to Business District (B-1) (Donnelly Rezone, R-098-84) . MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY TRIMM, COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. Ordinance #3889 An ordinance was read changing the zoning classification Crown Pointe of property located between Monroe Avenue NE and Union Avenue Limited Rezone NE between the 700 block of NE 4th Street from Business District (B-1 ) to Residence District (R-3) (Crown Pointe Limited, R-067-84) . Responding to Council inquiry from 1/28/85, Mayor Shinpoch indicated that site plans submitted WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE COMMITTEE REPORT FEBRUARY 4, 1985 ORDINANCES The Ways and Means Committee recommends the following ordinances for second and final reading: Appropriation and Transfer of Funds to Golf Course Fund Modifying Fees for Comprehensive Plan Compendium and Zoning Maps Donnelly Rezone, R-098-84 (from R-4 to B-1 - 636 Shattuck Ave. So..) Crown Pointe Partnership Rezone, R-067-84 (from B-1 to R-3 - Between Monroe Ave NE and Union Ave NE near the 3700 block of NE 4th St) The Ways and Means Committee recommends the following ordinance for first reading: Ordinance Ordering Construction of LID #330 (SW Grady Way from Lind Ave SW to Longacres Drive SW) APPOINTMENT TO THE HUMAN RIGHTS AND AFFAIRS COMMISSION (Referred 1-28-85) The Ways and Means Committee recommends concurrence in the Mayor's appointment of Ms. Sally Carlson for a term to expire April 25, 1987. /2 (--\ Ea er, i n Thomas Trimm Rob Hughes • Renton City Council 1/28/85 Page seven Old Business continued Fancher Flyways Transportation (Aviation) -Committee Chairman Mathews presented East Side Air a report regarding Fancher Flyways, Inc. East Side Air Park Park Lease Lease, LAG 07-79• The lease contains a stipulation that LAG 07-79 paving and landscaping are to be accomplished by the lessee. Because after four years, these improvements remain to be installed, the Committee recommends the following action be taken to enforce compliance with lease requirements: 1) Public Works shall prepare plans and specifications for paving, related drainage adjustments and landscaping. Effects of East Perimeter Road construction on the drainage patterns shall be investigated. 2) Fancher Flyways shall post a bond covering the estimated cost of this engineering work and reimburse the City for engineering costs. 3) Plans and specifications shall be presented to the Aviation Committee within 30 days (February 22, 1985) . 4) Construction shall be completed within ensuing 60 day period. 5) Failure of Fancher Flyways to meet these conditions will result in lease LAG 07-79 being declared in default. MOVED BY MATHEWS, SECONDED BY TRIMM, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Discussion indicated that on- going problems with this lessee for many years necessitated the recommended action. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS Ways and Means Ways and Means Committee Chairman Clymer presented a report Committee recommending the following ordinance for second & final reading: Ordinance #3885 An ordinance was read annexing certain territory located on- Squire the north side of SE 200th Street approximately one-half mile Annexation east of Talbot Road South to the City of Renton;. Squire Annexation. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY HUGHES, COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. Ways and Means Committee Chairman Clymer presented a report recommending the following ordinances for first reading: Golf Course An ordinance was read providing for appropriation and transfer Fund Transfer of funds to the golf course fund to provide for general operation in the total amount of $492,428.00 from Unanticipated Revenues: Golf Course Green Fees, Investment Interest, Concessions; and Contingency Fund - Operating Transfers-Out, Cumulative Reserve Fund #2104 (Park Equipment) and Water & Sewer Utility Fund - Operating Transfers-Out to Golf Course Funds - Operating Transfers-In. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY HUGHES, COUNCIL REFER THIS ORDINANCE BACK TO COMMITTEE FOR ONE WEEK. City Attorney Warren reported that the second draft purchase and sales agreement will be presented to owners tomorrow with anticipation of finalizing the transaction within two to three weeks. CARRIED. Comp Plan and An ordinance was read amending a portion of Section 1-4102 of Zoning Map Fees Title 1 (Administrative) of City Code relating to fees for Comprehensive Plan Compendium and Zoning Maps. MOVED BY , CLYMER, SECONDED. BY HUGHES, COUNCIL REFER THIS ORDINANCE BACK• TO COMMITTEE FOR ONE WEEK. CARRIED. Donnelly Rezone An ordinance was read changing the zoning classification of property located at 636 Shattuck Avenue South from Residence District (R-4) to Business District (B-1 ) (Donnelly Rezone, R-098-84) . MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY HUGHES, COUNCIL REFER THIS ORDINANCE BACK TO COMMITTEE FOR ONE WEEK. CARRIED. Councilwoman Mathews requested that agenda bill reflect referral of all rezones to Ways and Means Committee for ordinance. Crown Pointe An ordinance was read changing the zoning classification of Ltd. Rezone property located between Monroe Avenue NE and Union Avenue NE between the 3700 block of NE 4th Street from Business District (B-1 ) to Residence District (R-3) (Crown Pointe Ltd. , R-067-84) . MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY HUGHES, COUNCIL REFER THIS ORDINANCE BACK TO COMMITTEE FOR ONE WEEK. CARRIED. WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE COMMITTEE REPORT JANUARY 28, 1985 ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS The Ways and Means Committee recommends the following ordinance for second and final reading: Squire Annexation (north side of SE 200th St. approximately 1/2 mile east of Talbot Road S) The Ways and Means Committee recommends the following ordinances for first reading: Appropriation and Transfer of Funds to Golf Course Fund Modifying Fees for Comprehensive Plan Compendium and Zoning Maps Donnelly Rezone, R-098-84 (from R-4 to B-1 - 636 Shattuck Ave. So.) Crown Pointe Partnership Rezone, R-067-84 (from B-1 to R-3 - Between Monroe Ave NE and Union Ave NE near the 3700 block of NE 4th St) SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM (Referred 1-21-85) Upon advice from the City Attorney, the Ways and Means Committee recommends that no legislation is required to amend the Shoreline Master Program. The amendment requires approval by the City Council. APPROVAL OF VOUCHERS The Ways and Means Committee recommends approval of Vouchers No. 4576 through No. 4862 in the amount of $769,992.04. Earl Clymer, C irman r ^ I Thomas Trimm Rob Hughes Renton City Council 1/21/85 Page two Public Hearing Shane (RAMAC, Inc.) ' Street Vacation continued Continued of the vacation request would alleviate existing traffic congestion in that area, eliminate illegal dumping of garbage now occurring, and allow improved policing and protection of apartment buildings. Continued Phyllis LaRue (address above) questioned the depth dimensions of the vacation property. She advised that access to her property to the east had been assured in 1972 by the State from , their right-of-way south a distance of 200 feet. Mr. Shane indicated that he had no objection to provision of a full width street on the northeast corner of Mrs. LaRue' s property. Continued Mr. Lee noted that the decision of the Board of Public Works to deny the street vacation was based upon location of utility lines, and the Board had not addressed the issue of future access to abutting property owners. Continued. During Council discussion of the matter, the following information was requested: emergency access requirements; dimensions of the property requested for vacation; whether the petitioner could be granted the entire parcel or only one-half if the vacation is approved; whether or not limited access could be achieved by fencing off aisles between existing apartment buildings; underlying zoning of all abutting properties; history of the zoning of the apartment site and whether or not the looped roadway had been required to assure access to buildings; status and location of utilities in the area; whether or not there is a latecomer agreement allowing utility connection by Mrs. LaRue; and provision of an accurate site plan showing distances and dimensions. Continued Responding to one of the questions, City Attorney Warren advised that only the City Council has the authority to authorize the barricading of a public street. MOVED BY TRIMM, SECONDED BY CLYMER, REFER THIS MATTER BACK TO THE BOARD OF PUBLIC WORKS FOR ONE WEEK. CARRIED. MOVED BY TRIMM, SECONDED BY MATHEWS, CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR ONE WEEK. CARRIED. Consideration of the two letters of correspondence from abutting property owners and Council requests for Hearing Continued additional information were requested in the Board's review. CONSENT AGENDA Items on the Consent Agenda are adopted by one motion which follows the listing: - Comp Plan and Building and Zoning Department requested modification of fees Zoning Map Fees for Comprehensive Plan Compendium and Zoning Maps to cover increased production costs. Refer to Ways and Means Committee. Shoreline Building and Zoning Department requested revision of Shoreline Master Master Program to conform with the recommendations by the Program State Department of Ecology regarding landfills (Section 7.08.01) , replacing phrase referring to one existing bulkhead with phrase referring to two existing bulkheads. Refer to Ways and Means Committee. City of Tacoma Claim for damages in the amount of $1 ,457.15 filed by the City Claim for of Tacoma, Office of the City Attorney, 740 St. Helens Avenue, %Damages Suite 1120, Tacoma, alleging damages to Tacoma police patrol CL 41-84 car caused by collision with Renton police patrol car (11/11/84) . Refer to City Attorney and insurance service. Donnelly Rezone �Hearin• Examiner recommended approval with restrictive covenants sR-098-84 ;of Michael Donnelly Rezone Request, File No. R-098-84, for 0. 17 acre of property at 636 Shattuck Avenue S. from R-4, High : Density Multifamily, to B-1 , Business Use. Refer to Ways and ,Means Committee. For.Use .By City Clerk's Office Only A. I . # ford. AGENDA ITEM RENTON CITY COUNCIL MEETING m soam a SUBMITTING January 21 , 1985 Dept./Div./Bd./Comm. HEARING EXAMINER For Agenda Of (Meeting Date) Staff Contact FRED KAUFMAN (Name) Agenda Status: SUBJECT: Rezone of 0. 17 acre from R-4 Consent Public Hearing to B-1 for professional office. • Correspondence Ordinance/Resolution X Old Business Exhibits: (Legal Descr. , Maps, Etc.)Attach New Business Study Session ' A. see yellow file Other B. C. Approval : Legal Dept. Yes_ No_ N/A COUNCIL,ACTION RECOMMENDED: Approval Finance Dept. Yes_ No. N/A Other Clearance FISCAL IMPACT: Expenditure Required $ Amount $ Appropriation- $ Budgeted Transfer Required ,SUMMARY (Background information, prior action and effect of implementation) (Attach additional pages if necessary. ) ' CUP denied in mid 1984. Recommend rezone with signing of restrictive covenants. PARTIES OF RECORD/INTERESTED CITIZENS TO BE CONTACTED: SUBMIT THIS COPY TO CITY CLERK BY NOON ON THURSDAY WITH DOCUMENTATION. MI/ DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS gS7) /a / 0 WHEREAS, MICHAEL T. DONNELLY AND CYNTHIA M. KIMPO are owners of the following real property in the City of Renton, County of King, State of Washington, described as Exhibit 'A' attached hereto. • WHEREAS, the owner(s) of said described property desire to impose the following restrictive covenants running with the land as to use, present and future, of the above described real property. NOW, THEREFORE, the aforesaid owner(s) hereby establish, grant and'impose restrictions and covenants running with the land hereinabove described with respect to the use by the undersigned, their successors, heirs, and assigns as follows: RESTRICTIONS 1. The exterior appearance of the existing building on subject site shall be preserved to the fullest possible extent. .F 2. Uses on subject site shall prohibit operations requiring retail sales or intense, noisy commercial uses. 3. The alley shall be paved subject to the approval of the Public Works Department. DURATION These covenants shall run with the land and expire on December 31, 2025. If at any time improvements are installed pursuant to these covenants, the portion of the covenants pertaining to the specific installed improvements as required by the Ordinances of the City of Renton shall terminate without necessity of further documentation. ,ti Any violation or breach of these restrictive covenants may be enforced by proper legal procedures in the Superior Court of King County by either the City of Renton or any property owners adjoining subject property who are adversely affected by said breach. • MICHAEL T. DONNELLY CY THIA M. KIMPO STATE OF WASHINGTON ) h ss. County of KING6744 ) On this day ofJL iU 1985, before me personally appeared the person(s) who executed the within and foregoing fristrument, and acknowledged said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said person(s) for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set myhand and affixed m official seal the da and year first above written. y �` '� `±' y )/7,r ' Notary Publi jrn a the S e`qf Washington, a; residing at UUUUU ' s , ' • EXHIBIT "A" •:i The land referred to in this commitment is located in the county of King, State of Washington, and described as follows: ; LOTS 10 AND 11, BLOCK 6, SIIITHERS FIFTH ADDITION TO THE TOWN OF RENTON, ACCORDING TO THE. PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 16 OF PLATS, PAGE 33, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. yy' }`f iN A 1 '!v 11. Property of Michael T. Donnelly and Cynthia M. Kimpo trt 115 • tyf; ' '+k '.M 'i. /t:i OF RA, THE CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE.SO. RENTON,WASH.98055 BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR a LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER 90 `O FRED J. KAUFMAN. 235-2593 0,917- 60 SEP.1' January 4, 1985 Mr. Michael Donnelly 636 Shattruck AVenue So. Renton, Wa. 98055 Re: Rezone R-098-84 Dear Mr. Donnelly: Pursuant to our letter to you of December 19, 1984, we have enclosed an original and one copy of the restrictive covenants as pertains to your recent rezone approval. Will you please have the covenants signed and notarized by all parties concerned and returned to this office. Upon receipt of this document, we will forward to the City Clerk's office so this matter may be placed on the agenda for the City Council. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact this office. Sincerely, FRED J. KAUFMAN HEARING EXAMINER FJK/dk/0767 Enclosures cc: City Clerk ti - ,i DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS WHEREAS, MICHAEL T. DONNELLY AND CYNTHIA M. KIMPO are owners of the following real property in the City of Renton, County of King, State of Washington, described as Exhibit 'A° attached hereto. WHEREAS, the owner(s) of said described property desire to impose the following restrictive covenants running with the land as to use, present and future, of the above described real property. NOW, THEREFORE, the aforesaid owner(s) hereby establish, grant and impose restrictions and covenants running with the land hereinabove described with respect to the use by the undersigned, their successors, heirs, and assigns as follows: RESTRICTIONS 1. The exterior appearance of the existing building on subject site shall be preserved to the fullest possible extent. 2. Uses on subject site shall prohibit operations requiring retail sales or intense, noisy commercial uses. 3. The alley shall be paved subject to the approval of the Public Works Department. DURATION These covenants shall run with the land and expire on December 31, 2025. If at any time improvements are installed pursuant to these covenants, the portion of the covenants pertaining to the specific installed improvements as required by the Ordinances of the City of Renton shall terminate without necessity of further documentation. Any violation or breach of these restrictive covenants may be enforced by proper legal procedures in the Superior Court of King County by either the City of Renton or any property owners adjoining subject property who are adversely affected by said breach. MICHAEL T. DONNELLY CYNTHIA M. KIMPO STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ss. County of KING ) On this day of 1985, before me personally appeared the person(s) who executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said person(s) for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year first above written. ' Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at EXHIBIT "A" The land referred to in this commitment is located in the county of King, State of Washington, and described as follows: LOTS 10 AND 11 , BLOCK 6, SMITHERS FIFTH ADDITION TO THE TOWN OF RENTON, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 16 OF PLATS, PAGE 33, IN__KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. Property of Michael T. Donnelly and Cynthia M. Kimpo yY • E 1, • OF. R ° .. .► o THE CITY OF IE ,ENTON c.) •Cs . .f °} . MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 o ® " .- BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER 90 `� FRED J. KAUFMAN, 235-2593 0gr�D SEPt.NO December 19; 1984 . „ Mr. Michael ;Donne'lly 636 Shattuck Avenue So Renton, Wa.. 980.55. . • :a' •. Re: Rezone .R-098-84 R-4 to B-=1. • Dear. Mr. Donnelly . ;.. On November';,20;;: ;1984:::a ..cop--y.. bf`'the Report and Decision of this office was • sent to you The recommendation contained' the'rei n to the City Council was a pp roval.; With'the- , g g";of,-restrictive covenants. To date; we have not rece i ved :a':copy-of your proposed covenants. We would like to keepthi;s::matter; -moving-toward ;a City Council ; hearing, and: request a". that you forward th.i`s office a,;copy, ,s i,gned' and notarized, of the restrictive' f.. covenants so we may.. p;roceed:to, close our file. If you have any:.ques:t i ons, feel •f ree to con tact this office. • Sincerely,, FRED J . KAUFMAN HEARING EXAMINER' ; . .' FJK/dk cc: ✓City 'C 1;'erk. -4"1�' Michael T. Donnelly, SD.D.S. 1\IJi1J � Family Dentistry December 28, 1984 Office of Land Use Hearing Examiner City of Renton RE: Rezone file #R-098-84 636 Shattuck Ave. So. Restrictive Covenants To whom it may concern: The conditions set forth in the recommendation given by the Land Use Hearing Examiner for the reclassification of the subject site are acceptable and reasonable. I will therefore agree to preserve the exterior appearance of the building to the fullest extent possible and restrict the subject site uses to professional type business activities , thus excluding all retail sales , or intense commercial_. uses. In addition, pavement of the alley subject to approval of the Public Works Department . Sincerely, te:17 Michael T. Donnelly DDS MTD/vlb 231 South Fourth Place Renton, WA 98055 (206)271-8644 . AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING STATE OF WASHINGTON ) )ss. County of King ) DOTTY KLINGMAN , being first duly sworn, upon oath, deposes and states: That on the 30th day of November , 1984, affiant deposited in the mails of the United States a sealed envelope containing a decision or recommendation with postage prepaid, addressed to the parties of record in the below entitled application or petition. SUBSCRIBED AND , SWORN to before me this aQ '_ day of , 1984. Nota Publ c n and for the State of Washington, residing at ( p , , therein. Application, Petition, or Case #: R-098-84 - Michael T. Donnelly (The minutes contain a list of the parties of record.) ,, 0733E November 30, 1984 OFFICE OF THE LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND DECISION. APPLICANT: MICHAEL T. DONNELLY FILE NO. R-098-84 LOCATION: 636 Shattuck Avenue South SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Approval of rezone of approximately 7,476 square feet (0.17 acre) of property from R-4, Residential Multiple Family to B-1, Business use to allow for a future professional office at the subject site. SUMMARY OF ACTION: Building and Zoning Department Recommendation: Approval with conditions. Hearing Examiner Decision: Approved with Restrictive Covenants. BUILDING & ZONING The Building & Zoning Department Report was DEPARTMENT REPORT: received by the Examiner on November 13, 1984. PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Building and Zoning Department Report, examining available information on file with the application, and field checking the property and surrounding area, the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: The hearing was opened on November 20, 1984, at 9:00 A.M. in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. The following exhibits were entered into the record: Exhibit #1 - Yellow file containing application, proof of posting, and other documents pertinent to this request. Exhibit #2 - Assessors Map. Exhibit #3 - Site Plan. Exhibit #4 - Cross-Section diagram of subject property. Roger Blaylock, Zoning Administrator, was called upon to present the staff report. Mr. Blaylock stated the rezone criteria is utilized for this project, and there are two major issues. The area is designated on the Comprehensive Plan as high density-multiple family; property is less,than 7500 sq. ft. and has a 1600 sq. ft. building located thereon; 21% of the site is to be used for building, 43% for parking, and 35% of the site to be landscaped. It was noted that a request for a conditional use permit to allow the construction of a professional building on this property was denied in 1984. He stated he felt the request is appropriate and complies with the intent of the conditions outlined in the rezone code, but the rezone is not in the strictest compliance with the Comprehensive Plan for a high density multiple family zone. The rezone does comply with the policies in the Comprehensive Plan which suggest a creation of buffers between dissimilar uses. The issue is whether or not there is justification to allow the rezone that would create a use buffer at this location. It was stated that prior to the new plan in 1983, in 1981 the property on the northwest corner was considered for rezone. At that time a recommendation of denial was presented to the Council, but after an appeal, the City Council reversed that recommendation and granted a rezone for a real estate office. To the southwest of the subject property there is a Lincoln-Mercury dealership, with a Park and Ride Lot directly to the south of subject property. Another consideration for the request is the fact the area is in transition. Michael Donnelly Rezone R-098-84 November 30, 1984 Page 2 Mr. Blaylock continued with a review of the surrounding zoning. To the north is R-4 and to the south is L-1. He stated that many of the commercial areas have a type of buffer around them between the existing single family and the commercial area. It was noted that the Policy Development Department has advised that they believe the area should be changed into strict high density multiple family. The Hearing Examiner inquired if 7th Street could be used as a buffer for conflicting land uses. Mr. Blaylock stated there are 3 ways to consider buffering - a street can be used to separate land uses; landscaping can be used with physical buffers, and the intensity of land uses. He stated he did not feel 7th Street could be used as a buffer because in the future it has been designated to become a major arterial. Mr. Blaylock said the problem in that area is the discrepency between what the property is used for and what the property is actually zoned for. It is not felt an arterial like 7th Street could be used as a buffer but the use of landscaping or a land use could be an appropriate buffer. Continuing with the report, Mr. Blaylock stated it is felt the timeliness of the project creates a compatible land use and buffers major commercial and industrial development to the south. The second issue is the question of access. It was questioned whether the only access should be from an alley instead of from an arterial street. Both Shattuck Avenue and 7th Street are designated arterials, and if the alley is used it must provide at least 24 ft. of asphalt on which to maneuver. Added concern here would also be the creation of curb cuts to major arterials. There is a unique situation with this site in that there is a series of service ways. In this case there is an area as wide as 2 blocks, with no street in the middle. There is a street dead-ending at 6th, and 2 blocks that are serviced by a series of service ways which provide the access to the apartment complex to the east of the site. These service ways were created around the turn of the century, and it is believed by the limited improvement to the service way alley to the south that all the access will come out onto 7th Street. Mr. Blaylock stated he believes the access problem is manageable and the impact of the traffic would be less because the office hours would not conflict as much as the multiple family traffic that would generate more peak hour traffic. In summary, the Zoning Administrator recommended approval of the rezone with conditions requiring paving of the alleyway, approval of landscaping plans to create a buffer between office use and existing single family uses to the north, and the filing of restrictive covenants limiting the use to office and/or residential uses. The Hearing Examiner called for testimony from the applicant or his representative. Responding was the applicant: Michael Donnelly 636 Shattuck Avenue So. Renton, Washington, 98055 Mr. Donnelly stated he had no testimony to add to what had been presented by the Zoning Administrator from the staff report. A call for testimony in opposition was made. There being no one else in the audience wishing to speak, and no further comments from staff, the hearing was closed at 9:30 A.M. C' FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & DECISION: Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: 1. The applicant, Michael T. Donnelly, filed a request for approval of a reclassification of the approximately 0.17 acre (7,476 sq ft) subject site from R-4 (High density multifamily) to B-1 (Business/Commercial) to allow a dental clinic to be established. 2. The application file containing the application, the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) documentation, the Building and Zoning Department Report, and other pertinent documents was entered into the record as Exhibit #1. 3. Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and SEPA (RCW 43.21C, 1971, as amended), a Declaration of Non-Significance has been issued for the subject proposal by the Environmental Review Committee (ERC), responsible official. 4. Plans for the proposal have been reviewed by all city departments affected by the impact of this development. , Michael Donnelly Rezone R-098-84 November 30, 1984 Page 3 5. The subject site is located at 636 Shattuck Avenue South, which is on the northeast corner of the intersection of Shattuck and South 7th Street. 6. An existing single family home is located on the subject site. The applicant proposes converting the existing home to a dental clinic by renovating the interior. 7. The existing building is located 23 feet from S. 7th Street and 20 feet from Shattuck Ave S. The north side yard is 5 feet wide. An alley lies along the east property line of the subject site. 8. The site was annexed into the City in May of 1909 by Ordinance 156. The site was zoned R-3 (Medium Density Multi-family) in the initial adoption of the zoning code by the City in 1953. Subsequent reclassification occurred in July, 1959 when the site was rezoned to R-4 (High Density Multi-family), its current classification, by Ordinance 1778. A conditional use permit (File No. CU-055-84) to convert the building to the dental clinic was denied in mid 1984. 10. The map element of the Comprehensive Plan designates the area in which the subject site is located as suitable for the development of high density multi-family housing, but does not mandate such development without consideration of other policies of the plan. 11. The area in which the subject site is located has a range of uses. Immediately north of the subject site is a single family home, and similar uses continue north of the subject site. An apartment complex is located to the east across the alley, while other single family homes are located to the north along the east side of the alley. Multiple family housing is located west of the subject site across Shattuck Ave South. The Metro Park and Ride Lot is located south of the subject site across S. 7th Street. A real estate office is located across Shattuck from the subject site. This use is located on the northwest corner of the Shattuck and 7th intersection. 12. Both Shattuck Avenue and S 7th are designated arterial streets 13. The remodeled dental clinic would be located 23 feet from the S. 7th property line and 20 feet from the Shattuck property line in conformance with the proposed B-1 zoning. 14. The proposed use will cover approximately 20.6% of the subject site, while the B-1 zoning allows greater coverage. 15. Depending upon a number of factors, a building 95 feet in height could be erected on the subject site, the same limitation which now exists in the R-4 zone. 16. Access to the proposed parking is via the rear alley or service way. This alley or service way serves single family homes and other residential uses. In some cases it is the only access for those uses, but would be subject to use by the patients of the dental clinic. CONCLUSIONS 1. The proponent of a rezone must demonstrate that the request is in the public interest, will not impair the public health, safety and welfare and in addition, complies with at least one of the three criteria found in Section 4-3010, which provides in part that: a. The subject site has not been considered in a previous area-wide rezone or land use analysis; or b. The subject site is potentially designated for the new classification per the Comprehensive Plan; or c. There has been a material and substantial change in the circumstances in the area in which the subject site is located since the last rezoning of the property or area. The requested reclassification is justified and should be approved. Michael Donnelly Rezone R-098-84 November 30, 1984 Page 4 2. The subject site is located on the corner of two streets designated arterials; S 7th Street which carries reasonable levels of arterial traffic, and Shattuck Avenue S. which is lesser traveled. 1 his location makes the site less desirable for single family purposes although many single family homes are similarly located. The approval of the Daubert rezone (File No. R-009-81) across the street, would appear to indicate that this area may serve as both the transition and the buffer for the northerly residential uses. Certainly since the Daubert rezone, the site has lost some of its amenities for single family uses. The site could serve as a reasonable transitional use buffering its northerly neighbors from arterial traffic and the impacts of the Metro Park and Ride Lot. 3. While the area has been zoned for approximately 30 years for multi-family uses, it has retained its strong preference for single family uses and has only been affected by limited transition. The single family appearance of the subject site would not be altered. Therefore, it would presumably not hasten unanticipated changes to neighboring properties if the site were converted to dental offices. 4. The renovation, with the exception of the required parking, would be invisible. The structure would retain, for all outward appearances, a single family character. Any redevelopment of the site on the other hand would probably alter the entire character of the site and, therefore, the neighborhood. Therefore, the rezone should be conditioned upon preserving the outward appearance of the structure and limiting the subject site to non-retail uses. 5. The integral use of the alley for access to parking for the subject site should require paving of at least that portion of the alley adjacent to the subject site. Any determination upon the need to pave longer portions of the alley should be made by the Public Works Department. 6. Based upon the above analysis and the City Council's prior approval of the Daubert rezone, the City Council should approve the reclassification of the subject site from R-4 to B-1 subject the conditions listed. RECOMMENDATION The City Council should approve the reclassification of the subject site from R-4 to B-1 subject to the following conditions: 1. 1 he execution of restrictive covenants requiring the preservation of the exterior appearance of the existing building to the fullest extent possible and prohibiting use of the subject site from operations requiring retail sales or intense, noisy commercial uses. 2. Pavement of the alley subject to the approval of the Public Works Department. ORDERED THIS 30th day of November, 1984. Fred J. Kauf n Land Use He ing Examiner TRANSMITTED THIS 30th day of November, 1984 to the parties of record: Michael Donnelly 636 Shattuck Avenue So. Renton, Wa. 98055 TRANSMIT TED THIS 30th day of November, 1984 to the following: Mayor Barbara Y. Shinpoch Councilman Richard M. Stredicke Richard Houghton, Public Works Director Larry M. Springer, Policy Development Director Members, Renton Planning Commission Ronald Nelson, Building & Zoning Director Roger Blaylock, Zoning Administrator Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Renton Record-Chronicle 1 Michael Donnelly Rezone R-098-84 November 30, 1984 Page 5 Pursuant to Title IV, Section 3015 of the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before December 14, 1984. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for review by,the Examiner within fourteen (14) days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific errors relied upon by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record, take further action as he deems proper. An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Section 3016, which requires that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk, accompanying a filing fee of $75.00 and meeting i other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection or purchase in the Finance Department, first floor of City Hall. The Appearance of Fairness Doctrine provides that no ex parte (private ,one-on-one) communications may occur concerning land use decisions. This means that parties to a land use decision may not communicate in private with any decision-maker concerning the proposal. Decision-makers in the land use process include both the Hearing Examiner and members of the City Council. All communications concerning the proposal must be made in public. This permits all interested parties to know the contents of the communication and would allow them to openly rebut the evidence. Any violation of this doctrine would result in the invalidation of the request by the Court. The Doctrine applies not only to the initial public hearing but to all Requests for Reconsideration as well as Appeals to the City Council. 1 I i ! - L . .. __. . i [i _ _ _. - .....•.0 .e.7e. . .. , , �� '' roLc i I f •o�G. . ' .__20 a �"� "---- 1 I . .-O coca:....coot I so I pMi-rwici f7o.d _ _ _ • 1_ —' _—_;• '� �O• 1 "r �....fo..CLJ6 1 13 .1! 1 1- /:27L 11•ri ElD• U.7 �. I 7 • a — .. _ U!a lem,fh I_ /,.ar (cu..11c)wboc.::; I' ...slerf +�v • q-o' ri-n' f __21' Ifaf • euls� t,7eNcuc? PCNT rqG p f li •,•: i :µ. . . . s' • e- 7 OJtD �.t1y - _ i :�� �. ,•%v, .. LZ "IF..re...onp Q.IOf.ILuev Ac .a�.Y.- rsrBII .• cdn+cL u01ua ' 1 eta . i%NW Ell -- —4 - • -- - ca-v►�T. 1 1 i cfe.�.��es� .I.�a a..e l �.•.I.L rL1hI fO C.utCm ` . — — -- . T �_ l --.y. -- -- :a" 1 a s I / c "0: Td7Ci6T -" 0 ot=p� L.'NDy TCB ° .Q -- 190.011 43R7-G 6`.fs•�.2:N1GS - • MIa ! . • i LOEPOIG ta.22/33,j s••••.. __ — — - - h•O>:GrA.C.vale — — —_ - C. �n' 6T . DONNELL REZONE i -- ----------- --- R-098-84 i —_ ` • / 6.• ' SITE PLe,►.! \ ( • • . •• • --• t 1:02 w o•MI PROPOSED CLINIC PRoo vao,maG'J!^1f,, �L'�i&L'Irg©[: ( :•r.�L''•`:'='-`i'ir, 9�r (Ca i�. dTE RAN .l1 ����� n rf r f1(1���-.c /�Ij5/a+ FODR. I�ICHAELpDONNELLY Q�,�E'A1��UV ��)[�� �' l�I or'�`ry � ir���J�][ I - O?0 SHATTUCK AVE.0.RENTON.WA. -• • .ba. _-------- MI/VISION 1� s.pL 3lbL( art MOP1...Yf�I St.l ll( F113w�Mfi 1(X.-0.101 17n0) I(1 •1.7 OF J A. BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR rn 09 MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 • 235-2540 0,9gr�D SEPSE�O�P BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR MEMORANDUM DATE: December 3, 1984 TO: Fred J. Kaufman, Land Use Hearing Examiner FROM:�Roger J. Blaylock, Zoning Administrator SUBJECT: Reconsideration of Donnelly Rezone R-098-84 On November 30, 1984, the Land Use Hearing Examiner made a specific recommendation to the City Council concerning the Donnelly rezone to execute "restrictive covenants requiring the preservation of the exterior appearance of the existing building to the fullest extent possible and prohibiting use of the subject site from operations requiring retail sales or intense, noisey commercial uses." Restrictive covenants have always created some problems in the viewpoint of the Building and Zoning Department. Our concern is that restrictive covenants often do not have included in them a method for modification or the ability to change if the adjacent properties change in use and function. Since most communities are transitional in characters, it does not appear appropriate to leave one structure static forever under the limitations of restrictive covenants. Therefore, we believe that it is an error in law to impose restrictive covenants that do not include measures to modify said covenants if the adjacent development changes around it. We do recognize that a new rezone request could be made and new covenants imposed at that time. However, we also believe that some statement should be included in the covenants that suggest that authority or method of changing them. We would appreciate the Hearing Examiner reconsidering this point and including it in his decision. OF J (2 t4i ; , BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR no MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 • 235-2540 09gTc 5EP1c 0�P C BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR MEMORANDUM DATE: November 19, 1984 TO: Fred Kaufman, Land Use Hearing Examiner FROM: ,(0 Roger J. Blaylock, Zoning Administrator SUBJECT: Donnelly Rezone, File R-098-84 Please find attached the comments from the Policy Development Department, the Utilities Divisions of the Public Works Department, and the Police Department. The Police Department and the Utilities Engineering Division's comment were not received after after the staff report was submitted to the Hearing Examiner. The Policy Development Department's comments were received two minutes before the deadline for submitting the staff report to the Hearing Examiner. The Policy Development Department takes special exception to the application and recommends not approving it because it is clearly inconsistent and incompatible with the Comprehensive Plan designation of High Density Multiple Family. The Building and Zoning Department believes that the Comprehensive Plan Map and the Goals and Policies are inconsistent in this situation. The Goals and Policies are a refinement of the plan map and are used as secondary criteria in making land use decisions. The Building and Zoning Department further believes that it would not be creating an uncomfortable and uncontrollable precedent, which would affect the administration and enforcement of the Comprehensive Plan in these transitional areas. There are specific goals established in the plan to create transitional buffer areas. We believe the Examiner has the ability and understanding to consider those special cases based upon the direction of the newly adopted Central Area Comprehensive Plan. . . . . , . : , . . . . , . .. . -4,-, ,,-.- ,, . . • ........ . OF 1?'4, . ,.. , ,.. ..A,..' .1. . .- 4: ,•:#4m. . 0 tkO .%Go -...4. • • '- '•• ' '''. . . , , ••. - f .-. • •' ,,r ' :, i SA ' R • - ' 0 ' .•. ' . %•,.`' • • 0 '... : "4 . ''''',' - , n. , '...., ' ';—, :'"'.1: '',:., .. :7'. , 0 41/4 .ce-0 • . 0 SEPSES . , . . . . . - City of Renton. Land Use Hearing Examiner . , .. . , . will• hold, a• , L ' . . . • . . , .. . , • ,.... toy ,,,,,..0•:".„ ,. ,..., .. , ...,:,:i...,, ,,... ,..,-,.•. . , , , .-3.' --....., ,. ,' • ,4 ,., '.- .. , ;:: . 4 • .,... ,,,, .,,.- ,, • ;,,,... ,.., ;.•L. . ..........., ,••„ „ ,,.,...: '-, ,,,,‘.. 1. ::,--4,,:, ,...„k ,,,.'„ 1., , •e. ' . •'e, .“ .',', ' , „ : , • :,;,, •14-' '''.';- ; I, '.:.:'''2 ,'-' . A':::i I:: : :4t:I'S' :, f',# ...I.,:,'P'. ••""A!. ' '''. '' •., t ' . ", '''..1.'7;' ' : , . ' r r '',X., 1 '1' ;p‘q.'4';'1',, ':%4.'' ''* ' ,14'. ... •' •., : Si % ' ' • '.‘''',''''e:-*0: ' '.;:',(e' li;:' ?'' . ' ' .. ' . , ''' 1'...''‘.":I'. : .. ''''•' ':...'4 )....: ::' ' '..' ' 5 #', '..,:':'V ':`,Yr :: ,J,'"'; j :' * .. ' '•:: -...' '' '' -4 .„'. -: l''J' ,', ‘ , 0', .1.A '4 !1:' I Y, ' , '' ! : V ' /, ; -j r J ,,; i' i ' '',,' , ' . ', '1.7'4 '',. 1.,;: .... k •,-, ,tII , ,‘:.,•,','. ' „'-' •, -'. e4.!•' .- — • - • '' •' - ,'. F 1 .'F"' • e ;:-„; . . , ., ' ;!... 1-' ,' , . ,,:., , -. . :::„ z .. , ' ;,— ' . .....',, ,i;';,-;, '., ,..,....• ,:,e' , , . '.•r •:, ''.,:•:' . ' . tl' .' ,Y . , , :"' '. ''',. :' ' ' .te - • _ , • ., . - , . . •. ,. , r • ' ", in'''. -: ',,, ' , .. ,. . • • ' • . .CITY' 'COUNCIL CHAMBERS .; , CITY HALL ' L• - , . . , . . . ,. n k A, .;:oN '•'.• ,--:• J,.NOVEMBE R .20,-. 1984.:' . ',.:''. . : :. ' BEGINNING: AT MO A.M: r- .' owl. . . , . , . , . CONICE.* NIINGE el, , • . , . ' , . '''' From ' R-4 "'' '' " To B-1 . . . . ,. , .. .. , SPECIAL / , • , .,,,, • ,,.. . . L USE PERMIT . . ,. , . . a ' SITE APPROVAL , . •, . . . . . . .. . ' . . . . . SHORT PLAT/SUBDIVISION .0 f Lots L PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT _ „ • . I VARIANCE FROM • • . p . rii , . I, . . , . ' ,. GENERAL LOCATION AND/OR 'ADDRESS: , LOCATED AT 636 SHATTUCK AVENUE SOUTH. , . . . . . . . . . . . . . LEGAL DESCRIPTION ON FILE IN THE RENTON BUILDING & ZONING 'DEPARTMENT. ENVIRONMENTAL DECLARATION 0 SIGNIFICANT z NON—SIGNIFICANT . , FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CALL THE CITY::.OF RENTON , BUILDING&ZONING DEPARTMENT 235-2550 , . THIS,'NOTICE1':NOT.;:rTO - BE . REMOVED WITHOU7 ' --- PROPER : AUTHORIZATION,. ,,,,,:,,,..,, , . , • OF R4,4, �s . ° BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT -IRONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR MIL LIN O 0,30 - MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 • 235-2540 co' O,9 7. BARBARA Y. SHINPOCI-f MAYOR ,•• November 9, 1984 Cynthia M. Kimpo 636 Shattuck Avenue S. Renton, WA 98055 Re: Rezone Application, File R-098-84; Property Located at 636 Shattuck Avenue South Dear Ms. Kimpo: The City of Renton Building and Zoning Department formally accepted the above • mentioned application on September 27, 1984. A public hearing before the City of Renton Land Use Hearing Examiner has been scheduled for November 20, 1984. The public hearing commences at 9:00 a.m. in the Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall. The applicant or representative(s) of the applicant is required to be present at the public hearing. A copy of the staff report will be mailed to you before the hearing. If you have any questions, please call the Building and Zoning Department at 235-2550. Sincerely, Roger J. Blaylock Zoning Administrator RJB:JMM:cl 1167Z-2 IF OF R4,4 �� CEP, ° BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT '„"`f """ RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR NA `IN o 09 �� MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 90055 • 235-2540 09 7.. VEM SEP �P BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR November 9, 1984 Michael T. Donnelly 636 Shattuck Avenue S. Renton, WA 98055 Re: Rezone Application, File R-098-84; Property Located at 636 Shattuck Avenue South Dear Mr. Donnelly: The City of Renton Building and Zoning Department formally accepted the above mentioned application on September 27, 1984. A public hearing before the City of Renton Land Use Hearing Examiner has been scheduled for November 20,' 1984. The public hearing commences at 9:00 a.m. in the Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall. The applicant or representative(s) of the applicant is required to be present at the public hearing. A copy of the staff report will be mailed to you before the hearing. If you have any questions, please call the Building and Zoning Department at 235-2550. Sincerely, ---- ercitie- C-7- -.---Stekjrc,16 Roger J. Blaylock Zoning Administrator • RJB:JMM:cl 1167Z OF R4,4 �i ® 0 BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR o MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 • 235-2540 co- 0gTO os0' BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR MEMORANDUM DATE: November 19, 1984 TO: Fred Kaufman, Land Use Hearing Examiner FROM: /0 Roger J. Blaylock, Zoning Administrator SUBJECT: Donnelly Rezone, File R-098-84 Please find attached the comments from the Policy Development Department, the Utilities Divisions of the Public Works Department, and the Police. Department. The Police Department and the Utilities Engineering Division's comment were not received after after the staff report was submitted to the Hearing Examiner. The Policy Development Department's comments were received two minutes before the deadline for submitting the staff report to the Hearing Examiner. The Policy Development Department takes special exception to the application and recommends not approving it because it is clearly inconsistent and incompatible with the Comprehensive Plan designation of High Density Multiple Family. The Building and Zoning Department believes that the Comprehensive Plan Map and the Goals and Policies are inconsistent in this situation. The Goals and Policies are a refinement of the plan map and are used as secondary criteria in making land use decisions. The Building and Zoning Department further believes that it would not be creating an uncomfortable and uncontrollable precedent, which would affect the administration and enforcement of the Comprehensive Plan in these transitional areas. There are specific goals established in the plan to create transitional buffer areas. We believe the Examiner has the ability and understanding to consider those special cases based upon the direction of the newly adopted Central Area Comprehensive Plan. RECEIVED ov 191984 °'C ''OF RENTON ~ WRING EXAMINER ..Alk_ ti '. REN' 'I BUILDING & ZONING DEP [WENT DEVELOPMENT AP ITY iF RENTQN W SHEET NOV 1 31984 cm? OF RENTON ECF - 100 - 84 L•jo515 6- t• R-9 6 APPLICATION NO(S) : R-098-84 (REZONE) BUILDING/ZONING DEPT r,T 1. 1984 PROPONENT : MICLAEL DONNELLY °� ELOpPM N OEM PROJECT TITLE , DONNELLY REZONE BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION TO REZONE APPROXIMATELY 0.17 ACRES OF PROPERTY FROM R-4 TO B-1 FOR A FUTURE PROFESSIONAL OFFICE. LOCATION : LOCATED AT 636 SHATTUCK AVENUE SOUTH. TO ; PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 3/10/84 ENGINEERING DIVISION n TRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : l ] UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION 0 FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU OPARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT OBUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DOTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS' REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P .M. ON OCTOBER 9, 1984 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : APPROVED Ell.APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS SNOT APPROVED A14-401d/ C:45 -ivelor,t44.4014041 Gcd /4041Ait-LiJAL'A A 1 , 1gfl e d. -atir 64- le oc,v2.4e.. 2 '.1W410- /1.40104 (411-50-xo 8°-0 doe li-et-41-404e" 41//64 044-Le-e-4-Y. dtv Ptior -A4 14141 09- • a to ' • Afievez) eie.; 460 ec,pi A • l 1 1 •• / 42.P1kWo41 4 - . ,r 4414m.41 DATE : // f 3 8.v SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR IR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 1170Z BUILDING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING NOVEMBER 20, 1984 APPLICANT: MICHAEL T. DONNELLY PROJECT NAME: DONNELLY REZONE (R-098-84) A. SUMMARY & PURPOSE OF REQUEST: The applicant seeks approval to rezone approximately 7,476 square feet (0.17 acre) of property from R-4, Residential Multiple Family to B-1, Business use to allow for a future professional office at the subject site B. GENERAL INFORMATION: 1•. Owner of Record: Michael T. Donnelly and Cynthia rl. Kimpo 2. Applicant: Michael T. Donnelly 3. Location: (Vicinity Map Attached) 636 Shattuck Avenue South 4. Existing Zoning: R-4, Residential - Multiple Family 5. Existing Zoning in the Area: R-3, Residential - Multiple Family; R-4, Residential - Multiple Family; B-1, Business Use; and L-1, Light Industry. 6. Comprehensive Land Use Plan: High Density Multiple Family 7. Size of Property: 7,476 square feet 8. Building Area: 1,604 square feet (21.4% of total area) 9. Parking Area: 3,256.6 square feet (43.6% of total area) 10. Landscaping Area: 2,049 square feet (35% of total area) 11. Access: S. 7th Street and alley. 12. Topography: Level 13. Land Use: Single Family Residence 14. Neighborhood Characteristics: North- Single Family South- METRO Park 'n Ride Lot East- Multiple Family West- Commercial Real Estate Office and Multiple Family. C. PUBLIC SERVICES: 1. Utilities: a. Water: A 16-inch water line is located along Shattuck Avenue South and an 18-inch line is located along S.W. 7th Street adjacent to the property. b. Sewer: A 12-inch sanitary sewer line is located along Shattuck Avenue South and a METRO sanitary sewer trunk is located along S.W. 7th Street adjacent to the subject site. c. Storm Water Drainage: Storm water will go into an established storm water drainage system. ' PRELIMINARY REPOR I THE HEARING EXAMINER DONNELLY: R-098-84 NOVEMBER 20, 1984 PAGE 2 2. Fire Protection: Provided by the City of Renton as per ordinance requirements. 3. Transit: METRO Transit Routes #199 and #340 operate along S.W. 7th Street adjacent to the subject site. In addition, a park and ride lot is located on Shattuck Avenue South between S.W. 7th Street and South Grady Way near the subject site. 4. Schools: a. Elementary Schools: Not applicable. b. Middle Schools: Not applicable. c. High Schools: Not applicable. 5. Recreation: Not applicable. D. HISTORY/BACKGROUND: Action Date Ordinance Annexation 1909 #156 Zoned (R-3) 1952 Rezoned (to R-4) July 14, 1959 #1778 Conditional Use Request Denied - 1984 E. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE ZONING CODE: 1. Section 4-709B, Residential - Multiple Family (R-4). 2. Section 4-711, Business Use. F. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR OTHER OFFICIAL CITY DOCUMENT: 1. Commercial Goal and Objectives, Policies Element, City of Renton Comprehensive Plan Compendium, June 1983, p. 16-18. 2. Central Area Plan, City of Renton Comprehensive Plan Compendium, June 1983, p. 46-52. 3. Section 4-3014(C), Change of Zone Classification (Rezone). G. DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS: The following analysis focuses on the land use issues relevant to the rezone application request. A statement as to compliance with each of the specific rezone criteria as outlined under Section 4-3014(C) is reviewed along with the two issues of buffering and access. REZONE The following evidence clearly demonstrates that the rezone request is appropriate and complies with the intent of the conditions delineated under specific criteria of Section 4-3014(C). 1., That substantial evidence was presented demonstrating the subject reclassification appears not to have been specifically considered at the time of the last area land use analysis and area zoning. The subject site was rezoned in 1959 prior to the enactment of either the city-wide Comprehensive Plan or the central area update, therefore it would specifically comply with this criteria. 2. That the property is potentially classified for the proposed zone being requested pursuant to the policies set forth in the Comprehensive Plan and conditions have been met which would indicate the change is appropriate. The proposed rezone is not in the strictest compliance with the land use designation of High Density Multiple Family. The proposal complies with the policy to create buffers between disimilar uses, in this case the Light Industrial and Heavy Commercial uses to the south of S. 7th Street and the residential uses to the north. PRELIMINARY REPOR ) THE HEARING EXAMINER DONNELLY: R-098-84 NOVEMBER 20, 1984 PAGE 3 ISSUE: Land Use As a Transitional Buffer: The justification present by the applicant does not specifically delineate the Goals and Policies as outlined by the City of Renton's Comprehensive Plan, but in a general way suggest the importance of those plans to provide a transitional use between the different use activities on both the north and the south from the subject site. The Comprehensive Plan specifically suggests that buffering should be utilized in conjunction with the planned map and the following policies are taken out as directly applicable in this case. • Boundaries district should be buffered by uses compatable with each district (III.B.3.'pg. 12)(Policies Element - 1981) • Transitional areas should be converted from one use to' another as soon as possible, when new uses designed to be compatable with existing uses of that district. (III.B.4. - pg. 12)(Policies Element - 1981) • Landscaping which is suitable for screening and buffering should be provided between use areas. (III.C.3. - pg. 13)(Policies Element - 1981) • Industrial areas should be compatible with adjacent land uses. (VI.A.1. - pg. 18)(Policies Element - 1981) • Buffers should be placed between industrial districts and other land uses. (VI.A.2 - pg. 19)(Policies Element - 1981) • Office uses should be utilized as a transition between residential and commercial/industrial areas. Where opportunities for adequate sized land parcels are available, office uses should be an alternative to multiple family development. (IV.B.3 - pg. 46)(Centraj Area Plan - 1983) • S. 7th Street, west of Burnett Avenue S., should be improved to arterial standards to divert anticipated traffic growth away from South Renton residential areas. (IV.B.11 - pg. 49)((Central Area Plan - 1983) • Individual land use decisions should be consistant with available transportation and community facilities and should take into account potential impacts of new development on these systems. (IV.C.5. - pg. 52)(Central Area Plan - 1983) • Efforts. should be made to reduce the impacts of through traffic on residential areas. (IV.C.6. - pg. 52)(Central Area Plan - 1983) The policies in the Comprehensive Plan clearly create a judgmental situation. On the south side of S. 7th Street are industrial users where multiple family users are on the north side. There has been apparently no attempt to create a transitional zone between the two. A transitional zone can be created either out of uses or out of actually creating a landscape buffer between totally dissimilar activities. The policies are more specific and give the Examiner direction to consider rezone activities to create transitional zones. The policies limit transitions to an office or a lower intensity use. In this case, it would be appropriate for specific covenants limiting the development of the property to office uses. This would create a continuation of that intent buffer that was allowed when the real estate office was rezoned to B-1 on the northwest corner of Shattuck Avenue and S.W. 7th Street. 3. That since the last previous land use analysis of the area zoning of the subject property, authorized public improvements, permitted private development or other circumstances affecting the subject property have undergone significant and material change. PRELIMINARY REPOR'' 1 THE HEARING EXAMINER • DONNELLY: R-098-84 NOVEMBER 20, 1984 PAGE 4 Since the last land use analysis in 1981 and the original zoning of the property in 1959, a rezone to B-1 was approved across Shattuck Avenue S. Henry Daubert (R-009-81) requested a rezone of similar piece of property to allow a real estate office. The Hearing Examiner denied the request, but the City Council found that it provided the appropriate transitional buffer as delineated in the Comprehensive Plan. In addition, there have been major improvements to the area including street improvement and signalization modification of the intersection S. 7th Street and Rainier Avenue. Widening of S. 7th Street will also occur with the development of Lincoln Mercury automobile dealership south and west of the subject site. The Public Works Department is suggesting that an LID should be formed to improve all S. 7th Street. 4. The final test to determine whether a rezone is appropriate is to address the question of timeliness. The proposal seems timely in that it will create a compatable use and improve the appearance of the structure, at the same time buffering major commercial and industrial development to the south. It does not appear that the multiple family development to the north is as strong as the redevelopment of the commercial and industrial areas to the south. Public utilities are available and modifications to the street system will make the project appropriate. Primary Access From Alley: Should the only access to the subject site be allowed off of an alley instead of directly off of an arterial street? The site plan, as presented, shows the only access to the parking lot off of a public alley. Access has typically been provided in the older areas of Renton off of alleys that have been improved to minimum city standards. Development of the alley and the parking lot would not prompt commercial or office traffic through the residential area to the north. Only the section immediately behind the subject site would be improved and this, in itself, would discourage access to the north. In addition, the alley already services the multiple family complex to the east. Therefore, improvement would be a benefit to the multiple family development. The City has attempted, through many policies, to limit curb cuts to major arterials and, in this case, because we are dealing with a most unique situation where service ways were created for what would typically be two individual blocks. The alley functions more as a driveway and internal circulation system than the typical alley which would service only the rear of properties. The proposal does not appear to be either a privilege or detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare of adjacent properties or the subject property. It, in fact, is a unique situation created from subdivisions allowed at the turn of the century. Since the traffic will still exit to S. 7th Street, it does appear that the traffic will not impose any impacts upon other adjacent users. SUMMARY: This application is an attempt to use the language and intent of the Comprehensive Plan to create a transitional buffer use in the form of offices between light industrial uses and multiple family use which are designated on the Comprehensive Plan. It is supported by the specific intent of both the General Policies and the Central Area Comprehensive Plan. Since the Henry Daubert rezone in 1981, the City Council has adopted the Central Area Plan which states more clearly the need for transitional areas. We believe that this is a mandate to encourage the Hearing Examiner to look at individual cases and develop transitional buffers in particularly in the Central Area. It appears that this is a logical location to create a transition since it will not interfere with the continued development of the light industrial uses to the south nor the multiple family development to the north and, in the mean time, protects some of the single family nature of the existing residential development to the north. PRELIMINARY REPOR' THE HEARING EXAMINER DONNELLY: R-098-84 NOVEMBER 20, 1984 PAGE 5 H. DEPARTMENTAL RECOMMENDATION: Based upon the above analysis, it is recommended that the Hearing Examiner recommend to the City Council approval of the rezone request (R-098-84) subject to the following conditions: 1. Pavement of the alleyway from the northern property line to S. 7th Street. 2. Approval of specific landscaping plans to create a heavy buffer between the office use and the existing single family use to the north. 3. Filing of restrictive covenants to limit the use to office and/or residential uses. :::., LAKE /� a�, �, . ;. 1 r .—, • WASHINGTON e `; ii ----. 1..3,-- A , . ell [....0:,,,I, j 11.:::;.••-.- '. nit•j• 0000I1JJLiI:! X ��/111u11p' n 7.---.. ...... . . . . . 0 . 0 ., ,,,,+ , :::• .aaa►. 47 , r. ,.0I• _. 7t o010 0 0 0 0 0,0 O O +•O•�O O ,.,a i :::::. ��al .a.r' ,ma ,000 o'� • O O • O O • O O O, O • O �at>.ii ' 01� ••.• 0 ■:•� 0 o•p• q I •.•'.`' 1\1 gill Sp °000000 • •O •O • •O •. O O O - O O O - .•- t .."ell' M,p: 11°o°p9o° O • 0 0 0 • 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -!#mkt` ".a■■'r:.• i L. q o0000000• • O • O O O •• O • O O •• A O .' .. __1, •�■ ,00°0°000°a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O t.'o°o° °o°o•,yy O O O • O O O • O O.• O 10 �' i luau Ls p'. —'- -°o°o°o°o oT 0 0 • O • • 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 } I- ��■ar' iiii o000oc a•'o°o°o°p°o O • O • • 0 0 0 O © 8 ° M~ A 000000 °000°o o°A tt�® `� "' e O O O O O O • O O. O c� �GS�c,•oo•� 000000 °00000°°°• ? • • • • e O O •c • ' i� 1•o0op000ao• 4- O O O • O O O O O O O; O :"Ioo 00000000°0 O O • O e 0 0 O 0 0 p 0 ..\ ��°o°000°o° 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O�O �,, \\ :0000°p°ppo• O • o •0 0 0 0 , _ 0000• Ir'Ir�� °gpp°go • oo fr:::°.: t • `o0 o bo 5���,�, DONNELLY REZONE � �•t.•,• ��I'_o00000000 • • O • •III° O O O. O O '•••A u;;°° °° e • o o 0 o b o R-098-84 n ut• o 0 00000- r. �v .\Ca.lu; O O o \O ° C �7```\ p0000°p00000, 0 ••e• ' ��:>.,..,`..4 ut■ •O O O O O +..• � 0°400000° O O O r4 �� `ti,mla O O O O 'ill .op000g� � iiiiia o1 ■°° O°O • I / �o°0°0°0°0°00 °0°0°. 'ar- ...•._.. ' , !aiiiiiiiif '1 ;; °o°°o°o°°o°o°°o°o Ogg/ gala: o I• II■ al a■■■■■ // oo0oop00000°O•4` o•/1■,I 1I■11■ '11, r..:...:....: 71■■■a►..J p o°ppp000000°°O y' �p'!l E.III■.'•. Ii II■ o ;d'� :: _ \a■■I O O O O O O O VV'• ./Y p' All. /III •' .. ..i}.�4y:,. • °°0°000°O° °OOOOO°°°• �aa. i 1I/ ° O O ° O O O O :�., O •lief NIS NAM • �Qj' ::-• V •i..;j\. .: •O°p°p°p°° °000000°p° h,J: Tir1 0°o°o°O °p°O°p' `''`y,'0°• OII Q➢ t Q<?<:a•C<,:::;,:. e ,... - O \::.;:(;iiY: �•�li✓',.:::::.iy •��{4 000000000 000000000 •. II■1 .DOO°O�OOO�O�O��' On =d1� �T7•' `.,44..: 000000000 0000000000 1 ( ■■1.. O 0°p O ° O O O 0� •.:_ 1111 • ■■:, .. ., •p00 o 00000 000000000• ..... .. ,O O O ° O O O ° O . D <� r 000000000 OOOOOOOOOOr .•°° ■a _ 0.0_O' ■III .. .:1;• ?.r� '• 0000° 000000000 ° °°O• 0000 ° •�,� ■L•I■■.may- ►'�' v' � 111r�/�,,■.1 ■vi ••• 0000000 0°0O p O 00 O0°O•: , AOmooy�,�� • .,----/..lea'mar/ ll'• o000000000000000000 •■11■■a -.� ■11■■rl. .,, ••oo• •0000000000000000000 :':. :•:,'•' ' ___,.IZZ?7. __ �. ® ■n■/■�, � '1, �11�' 0000. o000000000000000000• \\1•...• III.. '�� •.>� f , •0000. ,I•:•:•:�:••:•:•: "� �, T� y, �n,u! r■ , 1�•.•� .0000000000000000000 " U,■■al �•'°'o'o•• , MIME' 0 ., 00000 '.. o ° ° t •I1■.'• �■ .•00000, •OOOOOo Ooo ��:;,, •-■■■1. 11■a■ rc :�Y /♦, •00 00000 `O; •'O O O O O O +�'1 •� '• � << ,J •00000 11 I •O 00•. t■aI■r O O O O O O � � .(�' . ( q 'p00000000 ■�;°.0pogoO°p°o •'1■■■•rer- , •F{ :•uFf„ �• .0000000o A� :1: }}:; I■■1■■■a o 0 0 0 0 e• ...um, �';� •0000000� • i..& <A:.' .' ZILI in. [ a: 1■■ u::.(40�, .i•//" ) { \U ' .000000 ?g''- - 88PI �. l./►C.'■■■■na�o .m_! ,c,y ...k ,i.y.,;..1� oo.• P ii■uo. ■nlu■1.. °O"y :u■►• n.i. . i:i:i:::::::::i:i:i::::: :a r d•w5.: ::..................... �7 11■a11■1.■U■Ila■■1• :% ■a►•�o .>. n. �, •,J {> -'�!= -- .. ...narnn.; ......_.•..rS ;5�;,,�'rt�,,• —�. c ur�.h'i; ` �'` r''r�.�Q��,?. ?•�2'ri,"�:^. : M .ii i.!■■n■al■L.■ ■■��ini' ,cJ , \.. 1ic is ',r3}s•.• '''9••�'3'r' r,0 .y fj�t�;�., i� ::.1:.:.i:.:.:.:.:.iii::.:::. 4 /pr �..� ,.. ,■■II ■■.AIIO■ •.<Si` .Y"!•' h.{ : �+a.4''o O':r op 1r J�'f'>'`U.. fJ. J:'r.o .o fP' R.•li+ ...... I \ �1I1Er■oI if r■l:ill is 0:'rin•�< rr L�,d,�.,ce,:/ ■6,�1'C�0,,,fJ lei•r.r'nn'• •r:,:'r;.sj; :O Cr.l' (Jf1:f,F..•ti • <;jft0. ' ,U, •• ,•'1\" ' ' (�1. t■■\. .:f n,n D C33h"'D .•r••,•••• •' 11 gPi'&.w3.• ..gijk 6.7 NMI •e). c.,V . 40. •1 ., ,M111.11 k;..)0_,,,-_/' •••••'-• • 4: e•C•k 1,‘• • 111p11P 4471" : : to . 1, S�,•, .c,, , +I� /�.! ;x'�� „. - :i .� � ""1.Y:4•, \: 11Pi! �'( -b a:3,. n., ,14 • , ...... . •F•f• Q�"k:... ,J,1 . 1tq`\U: iiigi:<:: s ■ `y; .fr:4 �'e,�o[a.'. I•c1`• C •.•^ :r .��. y ll: r e�('I - -� rl c M, eaea• ., ,rn• t,,t..^. , •'< f: ..e.qc ~...� �.�4� C'`< �r^'a°-•C>t� ------ 1, val\ a: ;:�.,rnr■r' !lab c• ► •'": r n•.2 nl <;,• `.,•,.,`•.U. E ,P?'(-. e_ r._{:. ------ •■■ >`:iv. ,.y �. 1 •�;q`!Z.<;'4 •i ft�1'.'.. 1''''' „4'r-• 's F •'t -- - :p•0l .._. ..4.- ``� .00000' .�.f�lw, rn, tl3f I�n�., <,. e•r. r't --- °:[ n lip- °O Eva S�`;�. .fie, c.. �aU• 'P!�°`: --� 4..' (^ :err --- • rI 1I•o0 •,'``, ��,• oo e.,.). '' i7�,'i,E)r,0. `. '.O,F•L. '�+� '„_ 1? n Y �t,•• -- 1•°0°'■m : `� ,- 00• �.c,. 4.<.. :.9 ei,?:,`„ :,s,5. •,`i7'3 `.ltre• e<--` •m- ry .t n hi'Fri.Q -_--_ 1.0.0 ■a •■■ �o•• .•�n.<n l ey S.:Q7-<: AEU <'`rJ .m4`)•,yG',i<.` •`� •'' 1, •y_ '< i .JP FrR.Y' +"- i s y�••�y( '>n'J' .i,°�l'!? ,n.al,^i•r1j.,(,�, <j .r L -02;{' ',f)7 1g lI'r4 --- ■ ',MEOW I `r : >,y, 'T<.Y.._i.t.r,�iAi:'• •,j:'4.. <t•v, Ll'i,' 01`vr `Id,,`t')•,e,',; J.V. -e 1r {�"l. I1 }F d n rli J':`��`. 'n o tv oo. Ebb' ',t1'ic �'c t..h,£3�i,�,o<r,Sj•t.Y. \, .I i]. .°0000: ';: f$ "'•.° <' . •0000 O ��`' :'fV•. `•'�' ('�1, ..00.0000. ••f 7 q - ����`,.■ ,v/t :• '''�'' ••*<I•. "< '�o£"'' 000°�' o.' '00000 �,;,•:::�>:: ::>5;i� )nsr,t„��¢r 1. - 1Q _ r: `�••� • 000°. �'.� 'oo• � 4 7)'' < '.�'`�?:� � lit Kill :________ _________:_, . 4 El nv:•:r: :rii' .,S, (. 0 0••. 1,`.Cn' Yi(41y. '• 0000 : —` CI �.��.9!!/A .. ..•'•' •00000•00. . ,""4 000• d...I °(n P;', 1 ) '•0000. 0000; CAI.pi E't.j I• --- rj )O F' .r,g , r r00o". ^nl or`•,.N•£l^"••;)•:,•1�1n;: •_-_ 1 1?:'- NV %° '...•....'� •!�Q ,q . . •000 '•`�'•+, 4�1”.,,, .. c. ;', 1 ";�� I oo ''i:i:;?:., >' I �s �! s..1 •0000 - e,•�;, ,,,,,• a: 4,`.2 --- 1"04 0O ":•:ri:. , `11 '°0000 ,r i;., r,..;"4'.'., • --- �jY� '• ' 00000 0 --- > 11 0000 '��: r Cc, < :00000 I nti,`,• •{, p1 • J. - w111 ):: �o°o ' �;> 00000. `� 1,,,,• -! car ::�' 1 �' 4. NNW .L'w: °o. ' '�L°0 , If ' ..,1T. I " ?',' '�.C�'` {° ' _ - �: 0000iZ� '"000°• � ' r I00000• lr " LAND USE ELE ' )ELT — /! _ _✓. •0000• 4i c -- 00000 _ ':4 'r - - 111i =_- •,a. , •000 \'•. __--- _ 3 Single family Commerciall ° ' ' 00• ——— Y/ • —— , 1 pop°.: t130. _ -""� _ —_- — Low Density \ ° ,: =_�' '• . —4 y• ►\\' Office / Office Park p°• -_—_- -__ iilllultE-Family ___ t., pf:( __ Medium Density 0000°°° Public/Quasi-Public ... RAultr-Family 000000 °° c• =- _= wv� =_= zvw =_ :Fj' ti^•`::2?%i•'k''• High Densitg� `tie 0,-I =-- - �' I ° < %:. $., .DID.: ; Light industrial = ' ••. ig u3;Gi :,:. Multi-Family :: 'i::: !/II ,—/ 00000000000000 • , 00000000,{ ,r� p.c<,r ; ; °O°°°p°°•; �,r•I ,/. ':• Recreation °O°O°O Heavy Industrial —-- 0000000• O 0 0 ____ 000000 0000: • _ •0000. 0000 000000• 00000•°0000. Si' !F% d OO°p•pppp°p ']• Greenbelt °°pop ,E:.�'.� `anufacturing Park •Op000.op000• • `1 . 'V1J` _o ,J. . w '� Il , 1 i ,.. . • I— i . �,a y Le _. . .F I 3 ( (_ 'tea • io) . _o' (t.NoroC1PA•.4 .. -put+i: .o c1a.a.. f I O veers-(Nq (jax.ara a cwlNuu[.swan � _ _. _ ran o - ea+e'��vmo ' e O —nowt�;,+Na KN7f.GA?.l RryT es..+ta ! / I -I -.-_ -_-- ad _ -- 1 ..T'-T'i -4a±GONG _ , !.. el LICEs to E� U / L O :2 crab) /' -4 �y extdf E!VA'f .. a h ! l I �' 0 3 NI@rTIR J d ' ♦ I • K-+v-.b e O- v - _ . E2ILI Y;l �— [ex=1., fir'!' B•d 'lye qo 9-o t0-g 2l•I�t 6opJ7' V I JO )Cf�}L ( u►IC� (L1804':; -I 1 r'-- �i�D��.Yi _IIITOW weL 12... D r %/1►ID FLoot(aT.) e2w b�: Fa----.Iwr rs.-,_ ( . 3 "'Jr": II orr. ,...55:. !. LiG • lirtj FC.:::Hr: - It E 111��JJJ777M1/F/ J �� +Ac .ad.�G- r` e RAH iAITJL , I1 �v� v.+ro�G � 1. -[T[-.' - vAti- CoM�r. ! d ®ac.Gs!ef� uwae.ae �Au uwfor.wcao __-c - :• nE!7t18T4" IO` . E ee . Hers .. .�►�. o' I ,dv►!. ' w' N °� - • 14GC1' I ogpl L'Ne1ars uRlv.faQ 4M•_G G.' cFJJG01 I --- . - Er•oT.oa.aC.v414. !h[H7TG C1flCb�/ - Y __-czar.s7.t. curia. - -- - -- ( \( - — — 5• �"' G'iz¢E4- DONNELL REZONE -- ---- ---- -• R-098-84 -- -....-.„.� .-- SITE PL111.4, •\ . I•.b-o . Ltll MO &AA" ETTE CLAM PROPOSED CLINIC G'r�'dOO MDaG7Ql� GzGd�C�Sra i., .'��(tiC�`� -i ':►'(-(•,r o E Vilib1 FOR DR. MICHAEL DONNELLY c� e `f c 'C?---+ o (` a �Q[L[�lr)[rJ C�31�7 UC��D� G� CjG3 �JM[� I 020 SHATTUCK AVE.0.RENTON.WA. - 1([v.�.ON ISO. SN(ISNOIE W ,. EMVE NOOTWt3T SE*TT(E M+(4wW(.TOM CVO, 17f0) rot OS07 • REI ,IN BUILDING & ZONING DE 1TMENT • DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF 100 - 84 APPLICATION NO(S) : R-098-84 (REZONE) PROPONENT ; MICLAEL DONNELLY PROJECT TITLE : DONNELLY REZONE BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT.; APPLICATION TO REZONE APPROXIMATEI..Y 0.17 ACRES OF PROPERTY FROM R-4 TO B-1 FOR A FUTURE PROFESSIONAL OFFICE. LOCATION : LOCATED AT 636 SHATTUCK AVENUE SOUTH. TO : 0 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 3/10/84 ' ENGINEERING DIVISION l iTRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : El UTILITIES ENG . DIVISION 0 FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU El PARKS & RECREAT.ION DEPARTMENT El BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT OPOLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 00THERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & pNING DEPARTMENT BY 5 :00 P .M, ON OCTOBER 9, 1984 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : APPROVED ® APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS 0 NOT APPROVED s iIt, w v1"'� h t_t l!v��C LT ,!T1 v�P. .1.r i/C.�• I fw-1` oy. Z 2 X ? y" "*". /a' (/ ' its a`^-- S 7 il`.S f DATE: SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : ! 74/?l am/c EN /`/ f`146 APPROVED u APPRQVED WITH CONDITIONS ❑ NOT APPROVED 1 • • `d /-r s i .72t. //4I p-"A-a,...)4l C:fry :"1.( /S f��2 v .lam 1J.-:?.;/.c.•-•?Z--)4. /ii --7 . : J-/,, �n 4, ,1 ,0 7F d d j a v) 7•-7-,,� �r.i-� R))-,.2;,< ��-L?,�. ;, , . .r�/ f>>-;,,�...j_- -r�..' ld / S Z4 f0 J 2, / f-, �" G , 7/ < p ir) . , c ® ram_d ) Y.,jef i_ ..• ty_ t... Y•l ..' .. / r'-_.- is f' /1! 7 1.�/.._ "/;.'.p/ y i. 10 4..�� ,...7�� .� DATE : / o — cl-_ F,2;._1 SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORI�IED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 ) REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVIS ON : cTh^. 1.7-e- f/`c'11ei1/1 O/� ri APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS El NOT APPROVED CdiCe /14 Old Ai Z N /n1 �J � / � Gl/ : e,e-re/I /S v 0_- Y/ gir a.c>rniy-e-S 5 ei l`rCt, 5•4,(lc e_ a/-,--7-- eii,i d 1,(,),,/12/.,:ic( - 1.41' /� `� iri.Y o t A14- `I' C. C.00C'_ k.-6 i'l5 k lc l;6 tk a/7�t.,-r 51e1 .1.1, . 0 �frZ-1 � ir- e_ e,,,, /;��• rri S /C,"i- lC2`ui ^r_c W.I.,rr.tN1 c:::-1—4 - a 7,. .5,,.(,.,,e,e/ _c-;./. e c2Atu /':-' d a/°1.11.- /' 4� DATE: / 6g SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR 0l' A • HORIZED EP SENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form• 182 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : On Alry x/6/R1,,E-A-E/tc16, Illa APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS ❑ NOT APPROVED UTILITY APPROVAL SUBJECT TO I to L.TE COPIERS AGREEMENT • WATER A/0 ` / \VC LATE COPIERS AGREEMENT • SEWER I MO o o _WIEM CEV '.CP.MENT CHARGE • `".ATER Y`, 0o. 04/sQ. 7 - x t74760 L7 = 30O • c ' `y„Eb GEYE►GP?"4T CMAR�f • SEWER 7 /� a ..Er:•..'.l ASSr.SS N1 aC-R CHARGE • WiTER f 0 _ ��{{ • .Iir ,E;;ESSPIENT AREA VI:1;(1E • SEMEN Ill// no' • !Yqi1L<5 !WA PLAN 2 4??RGVE0 FIRE BTCRAr RUM S. e2. k/ y� Bi f 1,nc E•T. 0 fi.p ki-() FIRE F101~' G;tviifi57 ____ ;•�: a4� C___ DATE : 1(3'(�c9(2-- SIGNATURE pr DIRECTUK U,< AUTHOR7 . ::":) REPRESENTATIVE L4AFPROVED U APPROVED W1IN LUINUI I1UIW u IVvl MrrRvvLL/ / ," p4" dy%v� DATE : /0 �D���� SIGNA R OF DIREOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : i 0 APPROVED Eil APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS 1:11NOT APPROVED /_ `P. ;; I/ Ur11- . • ; .(' /;- . . `. L- /- DATE: (()7./ 2- - t V SIGNATURE OF DIRECI11OR OR/AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : @LD 5APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS ONOT APPROVED --6 -D6., CO Ol.."-_7,- Fc,,z.. x .t-cY E.- 2_. 0 c-c-(.2,,e Aiu di �� C'. /-.1-e4-�.�= DATE : /J - ./1--/5/ SIGNATURE OF` DIR CTOF° 1R AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 • FIN. --DECLARATION OF NON-SIGNIFI"' CE • Application No(s): R-098-84 • Environmental Checklist No.: ECF-100-84 Description of Proposal: Application to rezone approximately 0.7 acres of property from R-4 to B-1 for future professional office use. Proponent: MICHAEL T. DONNELLY Location of Proposal: 636 Shattuck Avenue South Lead Agency: City of Renton Building and Zoning Department This proposal was reviewed by the ERC on October 10, 1984, followipg a presentation by Jerry Lind of the Building and Zoning Department. Oral comments were accepted from: Gene Williams, Jerry Lind, Richard Houghton, James Bourasa, Roger Blaylock, Ronald Nelson, James Matthew, Michael Parness and Robert Bergstrom Incorporated by reference in the record of the proceedings of the ERC on application ECF-100-84 are the following: 1. Environmental Checklist Form, prepared by: Michael T. Donnelly, dated September 27, 1984. 2. Applications: Rezone (R-098-84). 3. Recommendations for a declaration of non-significance: Building. and Zoning • Department, Design Engineering Division, Traffic Engineering Division, Utilities Engineering Division, Fire Prevention Bureau, Policy Develoi ment Department, Parks and Recreation Department, and the Police Department. Acting as the Responsible Official, the ERC has determined this development does not have a significant adverse impact on the environment. An EIS is not required under RCW 43.21 C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review by the lead agency of a complete environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. Reasons for declaration of environmental non-significance: The subject rezone will not adversely impact the environment or adjacent properties. INFORMATION: Major off-site street improvements by the applicant may be required at the time a building permit is issued. SIGNATURES: Ronald G. Nelson Michael Pa s Building and Zoning Director Administrative Assistant to the Mayor Ri hard C. Houghton Public Works Director PUBLISHED: Uctooer 15, 1984 APPEAL DATE: October 29, 1984 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET ECF - 100 - 84 APPLICATION No(s) : R-09$-84 (REZONE) PROPONENT: MICHAEL T. DONNELLY PROJECT TITLE: DONNELLY REZONE • Brief Description of Project: APPLICATION TO REZONE APPROXIMATELY 0.17 ACRE OF PROPERTY FROM R-4 to B-1 FOR FUTURE PROFESSIONAL OFFICE. LOCATION: LOCATED AT 636 SHATTUCK AVENUE SOUTH. SITE AREA: 0.17 ACRE BUILDING AREA (Gross) : N/A DEVELOPMENT COVERAGE (%) : N/A IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1) Topographic Changes : x 2) Direct/Indirect Air Quality: x 3) Water & Water Courses : x 4) Plant Life: x 5) Animal Life: x 6) Noise: x - 7) Light & Glare: x • 8) Land Use; North: :SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL East : SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL South: PARK IN RIDE LOT West : MULTI FAMILY RESIDENTIAL Land Use Conflicts: NONE APPARENT View Obstruction: NONE 9 ) Natural Resources: X 10) Risk of Upset: x 11) Population/Employment: X 12) Number of Dwellings : X 13 ) Trip Ends ( ITE) • APPROXIMATELY 25 ADT Traffic Impacts: NONE EXPECTED TO BE SIGNIFICANT 14 ) Public Services : X 15) Energy: X 16) Utilities : X 17) Human Health: X 18) Aesthetics : X 19) Recreation: X 20) Archeology/History: X Signatures : Ronald G. Nelson Michael Parness Building & Zoning Director Administrative Assistant to the Mayor "`' �' PUBLISHED• OCTOBER 15, 1984 Richard C. Houghton APPEAL DATE: OCTOBER 29, 1984 Public Works Dire 6-83 1163Z NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER RENTON, WASHINGTON A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS ON THE SECOND FLOOR OF CITY HALL, RENTON, WASHINGTON ON NOVEMBER 20, 1984, AT 9:00 A.M. TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PETITION: MICHAEL T. DONNELLY Application to rezone approximately 0.17 acre of property from R-4 to B-1 for future professional office, file R-098-84, located at 636 Shattuck Avenue South. Legal descriptions of the files noted above are on file in the Renton Building and Zoning Department. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT THE PUBLIC HEARING ON NOVEMBER 20,1984, AT 9:00 A.M. TO EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS. PUBLISHED : November 9, 1984 Ronald G. Nelson Building and Zoning Director CERTIFICATION I, JEANETTE SAMEK-McKAGUE, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT. THREE COPIES OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENTS WERE POSTED BY ME IN THREE CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON • THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED ABOVE AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW. ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a Notary Public in and for the State of Washington residing in ;��� 3,C-c�e%�-. " , on the 9th day of November; 14. • SIGNED: ')/to_ tujiA REN" N BUILDING & ZONING DEF. :TMENT 24. DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 100 - 84 APPLICATION NO(S) : R-098-84 (REZONE) PROPONENT : MICLAEL DONNELLY PROJECT TITLE : DONNELLY REZONE BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION TO REZONE APPROXIMATELY 0.17 ACRES OF PROPERTY FROM R-4 TO B-1 FOR A FUTURE PROFESSIONAL OFFICE. LOCATION : LOCATED AT 636 SHATTUCK AVENUE SOUTH. TO : 0 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 3/10/84 El ENGINEERING DIVISION El TRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION El FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT 0 BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT gPOLICE DEPARTMENT El POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT E] OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE 'PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P .M, ON OCTOBER 9, 1984 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : /44/",e.:e_ ligogFPROVED El APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS 0 NOT APPROVED 4r Or �' � DATE: IO ' 2- 8 . SIGNA R OF DIRE3 OR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Fnrm 1R7 REP N BUILDING & ZONING DEI 1TMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 100 - 84 APPLICATION NO(S) : R-O98-84 (REZONE) PROPONENT : MICLAEL DONNELLY PROJECT TITLE : DONNELLY REZONE BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION TO REZONE APPROXIMATELY 0.17 ACRES OF PROPERTY FROM R-4 TO B-1 FOR A FUTURE PROFESSIONAL OFFICE. LOCATION : LOCATED AT 636 SHATTUCK AVENUE SOUTH. TO : 0 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 3/10/84 ENGINEERING DIVISION n TRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : El UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION 0 FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU pr4 PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT n BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT El POLICE DEPARTMENT POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING . PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P .M. ON OCTOBER 9, 1984 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : APPROVED n APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS ® NOT APPROVED 1 .74, DATE : l9-Z7 SIGNATURE OF DIREC R 0 AUTHORIZED EPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 REIN N BUILDING & ZONING DEI- TMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 100 - 84 APPLICATION NO(S) : R-098-84 (REZONE) PROPONENT : MICLAEL DONNELLY PROJECT TITLE : DONNELLY REZONE BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION TO REZONE APPROXIMATELY 0.17 ACRES OF PROPERTY FROM R-4 TO B-1 FOR A FUTURE PROFESSIONAL OFFICE. LOCATION : LOCATED AT 636 SHATTUCK AVENUE SOUTH. TO : 11:1 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 3/10/84 0 ENGINEERING DIVISION ri TRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION 0 FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU El PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT 1 BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT 0 POLICE DEPARTMENT El POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ri OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P .M. ON OCTOBER 9, 1984 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : 631l7 APPROVED 0 APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS 0 NOT APPROVED be- 0 i /U L&�� --fz) Co - Z, O G L-cAe Al-t)Lei DATE: - '415 SIGNATURE OP' DIRtCTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE r' REVISION 5/1982 y • REN N BUILDING & ZONING DEF TMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 100 - 84 APPLICATION NO(S) : R-O98=84 (REZONE) PROPONENT : MICLAEL DONNELLY PROJECT TITLE : DONNELLY REZONE BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION TO REZONE APPROXIMATELY 0. 17 ACRES OF PROPERTY FROM R-4 TO B-1 FOR A FUTURE PROFESSIONAL OFFICE. LOCATION : LOCATED AT 636 SHATTUCK AVENUE SOUTH. TO : n PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 3/10/84 ENGINEERING DIVISION jSil TRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : El UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION 0 FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU El PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT .BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT 111 POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P .M, ON OCTOBER 9, 1984 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : 7 R, F/� APPROVED n APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED Re4)u;r c( 6 F F / d'e Aft v /' d P "° /tee-- S� W t5 Li f JaI 421- a p sc � L L � + 4-+4fly ,e)f- 5 a te' t r 7 e k s/Lc ® � , ICJate . /'Z �° I, �oLi v-a ae;�i e i'7!A,7 .� c;2 , L�y DATE : / 6 — SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORI ED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 REP N BUILDING & ZONING DEI TMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 100 - 84 APPLICATION NO(S) : R-O98-84 (REZONE) PROPONENT : MICLAEL DONNELLY PROJECT TITLE : DONNELLY REZONE BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION TO REZONE APPROXIMATELY 0.17 ACRES OF PROPERTY FROM R-4 TO B-1 FOR A FUTURE PROFESSIONAL OFFICE. LOCATION : LOCATED AT 636 SHATTUCK AVENUE SOUTH. TO : • PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 3/10/84 ENGINEERING DIVISION n TRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : n UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU • PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT • BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT El POLICE DEPARTMENT • POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P .M. ON OCTOBER 9, 1984 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVIS ON : � l'� l"eileks/, 'o�ij • APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS ❑ NOT APPROVED - #ee Die-/l �u/ / � e-C_/ 7",-„Le,„..teA77:5 - 6rn 1; e-6$ e1 ��$ S! a/'.eC e e-e? an i %n 5 ///3?Pp Cocie-C"C611571'hc-I;c9 IA a n ollirLda apt /)t�;�/'�lZ// 7 o 'C �rn y C©ram /^ 1 ��/ //�//J /,�/, R Y V pia tie__ ��rr C._/- !Z l !J /`e~..7 e��yy�j(//�G,riC ' "/J!/T'1{7j�'!�, "l /'g c. • krit-ed n � ' I DATE : /e2 - 6 - � SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR 0' A . -HORIZED EP SENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 - ' REt N BUILDING & ZONING DEI TMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 100 - 84 APPLICATION NO(S) : R-098-84 (REZONE) PROPONENT : MICLAEL DONNELLY PROJECT TITLE : DONNELLY REZONE BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION TO REZONE APPROXIMATELY 0.17 ACRES OF PROPERTY FROM R-4 TO B-1 FOR A FUTURE PROFESSIONAL OFFICE. LOCATION : LOCATED AT 636 SHATTUCK AVENUE SOUTH. TO : • PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 3/10/84 El ENGINEERING DIVISION n TRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : wi UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION El FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU • PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT n POLICE DEPARTMENT El POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Ell OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P ,M, ON OCTOBER 9, 1984 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : (/T/I-/Ty E(APPROVED n APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS fl NOT APPROVED UTILITY APPROVAL SUBJECT TO LATE COMERS AGREEMENT • WATER ,k/0 LATE COMERS AGREEMENT • SEWER /(fQ oo SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CUE - "`ATER ,,C1 Oa 04/SQ. FT x 74 7�, = 3Q 0 • 2 %':3TEA1 OEYELOPtP.:'NT CRANE • SEWER y. /i I( J 00 S ECIM. AS"sfSSk EIIT aR?=A CHARGE • WATER No d{ boo. `-'i: AL ASSESSMENT AREA Cli°RGE • SEWER An) 0 A-PP DYE i MA PLAN 7 -(iPPROvea STI'ER PLAN 2 A APPROVED FIRE NUR' LOCATIO•S BY FIRE OE'T. IFIRE FLOW ARALYSIS / ? DATE : /0`/P-34—. SIGNATURE IF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 r 1 0537N NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a final declaration of non-significance for the following projects: MICHAEL T. DONNELLY (ECF-100-84) Application to rezone approximately 0.17 acre of property from R-4 to B-1 for future professional office, file R-098-84, located at 636 Shattuck Avenue South. CITY OF RENTON, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT (ECF-102-84) The subject checklist is for the installation of a 12 inch watermain and appurtenances approximately 1,000 feet in length; located on Grant Avenue South from S. 7th Street to S. 9th Street and on S. 7th Street from Renton Avenue South to Grant Avenue South. CITY OF RENTON, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT (ECF-103-84) The subject checklist is for the installation of a 12 inch watermain and appurtenances; located on Union Avenue N.E. between N.E. 19th Street and N.E. 25th Street. Further information regarding this action is available in the Building and Zoning Department, Municipal . Building, Renton, Washington, 235-2550. Any appeal of ERC action must be filed with the Hearing Examiner by October 29, 1984. • Published: October 15, 1984 r' FINAL DECLARATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE Application No(s): R-098-84 Environmental Checklist No.: ECF-100-84 Description of Proposal: Application . to rezone approximately 0.7 acres of property from R-4 to B-1 for future professional office use. Proponent: • MICHAEL T. DONNELLY Location of Proposal: 636 Shattuck Avenue South Lead Agency: City of Renton Building and Zoning Department This proposal was reviewed by the ERC on October 10, 1984, following a presentation by Jerry Lind of the Building and Zoning Department. Oral comments were accepted from: Gene Williams, Jerry Lind, Richard Houghton, James Bourasa, Roger Blaylock, Ronald Nelson, James Matthew, Michael Parness and Robert Bergstrom Incorporated by reference in the record of the proceedings of the ERC on application ECF-100-84 are the following: 1. Environmental Checklist Form, prepared by: Michael T. Donnelly, dated September 27, 1984. 2. Applications: Rezone (R-098-84). 3. Recommendations for a declaration of non-significance: Building and Zoning Department, Design Engineering Division, Traffic Engineering Division, Utilities Engineering Division, Fire Prevention Bureau, Policy Development Department, Parks and Recreation Department, and the Police Department. Acting as the Responsible Official, the ERC has determined this development does not have a significant adverse impact on the environment. An EIS is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review by the lead agency of a complete environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. Reasons for declaration of environmental non-significance: The subject rezone will not adversely impact the environment or adjacent properties. INFORMATION: Major off-site street improvements by the applicant may be required at the time a building permit is issued. SIGNATURES: (..; ��7;�____._._. mil/ Ronald G. Nelson Michae Pa s Building and Zoning Director Administrative Assistant to the Mayor Ri hard C. Houghton , Public Works Director PUBLISHED: October 15, 1984 APPEAL DATE: October 29, 1984 a ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET ECF - 100 - 84 APPLICATION No(s ) : R-098-84 (REZONE) PROPONENT: MICHAEL T. DONNELLY PROJECT TITLE: DONNELLY REZONE Brief Description of Project : APPLICATION TO REZONE APPROXIMATELY 0.17 ACRE OF PROPERTY FROM R-4 to B-1 FOR FUTURE PROFESSIONAL OFFICE. LOCATION: LOCATED AT 636 SHATTUCK AVENUE SOUTH. SITE AREA: 0.17 ACRE BUILDING AREA (Gross) : N/A DEVELOPMENT COVERAGE (%) : N/A IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1) Topographic Changes : X 2) Direct/Indirect Air Quality: x 3) Water & Water Courses : x 4) Plant Life: x 5) Animal Life: x 6) Noise: X 7) Light & Glare: x 8) Land Use; North: SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL East : SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL South: PARK 'N RIDE LOT West : MULTI FAMILY RESIDENTIAL - Land Use Conflicts : NONE APPARENT View Obstruction: NONE 9) Natural Resources: X 10) Risk of Upset: X 11) Population/Employment : X 12) Number of Dwellings : X 13) Trip Ends ( ITE) : APPROXIMATELY 25 ADT Traffic Impacts : NONE EXPECTED TO BE SIGNIFICANT 14) Public Services : X 15) Energy: X 16) Utilities : X 17) Human Health: X 18) Aesthetics : X 19) Recreation: X 20) Archeology/History: X Signatures: -Ronald G. Nelson Michael Parness Building & Zoning Director Administrative Assistant to the Mayor -4 —d° PUBLISHED: OCTOBER 15, 1984 Richard C. Hought n APPEAL DATE: OCTOBER 29, 1984 Public Works Director 6-83 Date circulated : OCTOBER 1, 1984 Comments due : OCTOBER 9, 1984 ENVIIRONMENITAL CHECKLIST REVIIEIJ SHEET ECF - 100 _ 84 • APPLICATION N o (s ) . R-098-84 (REZONE) arif or RENTnN PROPONENT : MICHAEL DONNELLY OCT 1 1984 PROJECT TITLE : DONNELLY REZONE POUCY DEVEIArM!T 06P" Brief Description of Project : APPLICATION TO REZONE APPROXIMATELY 0.17 ACRE OF PROPERTY FROM R-4 TO B-1 FOR FUTURE PROFESSIONAL OFFICE. LOCATION : LOCATED AT 636 SHATTUCK AVENUE SOUTH. SITE AREA : 0.17 ACRE BUILDING AREA (gross) N/A DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) : N/A IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1 ) Topographic changes : 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : 3) Water & water courses : (� 4) Plant life : 1///-' 5 ) Animal life : 6) Noise : 7 ) Light & glare : v 8 ) Land Use ; _ north : 5IKfL• 1:4•1��,LL east : "P„a�.r p�v* ll south : 1 r/G cn R e .[_o "- west : FeL*rti[.y Land use conflicts : // View obstruction : 9) Natural resources : 10 ) Risk of upset : /'//' 11 ) Population/Employment : 1/ 12 ) Number of Dwellings : 13 ) Trip ends ( ITE) : Pit7_ traffic impacts : 14 ) Public services : I`„'' -- • 15 ) Energy : 16 ) Utilities : l� 17 ) Human health : 18 ) Aesthetics : 19 ) Recreation : 20 ) Archeology/history : COMMENTS : Recommendation : DNSI DOS More Information_ Reviewed by : . Y&i.2 4 OI, e,YI Title : Date : (Ors. (019 FORM: ERC-06 eTt . ‘-'!*!*4Date circulated : OCTOBER 1, 1984 Comments due : OCTOBER 9, 1984 - EMIVIIRONHEIwTAL CHECKLIST REVIIEW SHEET ECF - 100 - 84 APPLICATION No (s ) . R-098-84 (REZONE) PROPONENT : MICHAEL DONNELLY PROJECT TITLE : DONNELLY REZONE Brief Description of Project : APPLICATION TO REZONE APPROXIMATELY 0.17 ACRE OF PROPERTY FROM R-4 TO B-1 FOR FUTURE PROFESSIONAL OFFICE. LOCATION : LOCATED AT 636 SHATTUCK AVENUE SOUTH. SITE AREA : 0.17 ACRE BUILDING AREA (gross) N/A DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) : N/A IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1 ) Topographic changes : 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : 3) Water & water courses : 4) Plant life : 5 ) Animal life : 6) Noise : 7) Light & glare : 8 ) Land Use ; . north: east : south : west : Land use conflicts : View obstruction : 9) Natural resources : 10 ) Risk of upset : 11 ) Population/Employment : 12 ) Number of Dwellings : 13 ) Trip ends ( ITE) : traffic impacts : 14 ) Public services : // 15 ) Energy : 16 ) Utilities : j 17 ) Human health : 18 ) Aesthetics : 19 ) Recreation : 20 ) Archeology/history : COMMENTS : Recommendation : D' SI DOS More Information Reviewed by : L-d ' tle : f. Date : —6P FORM: ERC-06 POLICS � _ J Date circulated : OCTOBER 1, 1984 Comments due : OCTOBER 9, 1984 ENVIIRONMENITAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET ECF - 100 _ 84 APPLICATION N,o (s ) . R-098-84 (REZONE) PROPONENT : MICHAEL DONNELLY PROJECT TITLE : DONNELLY REZONE Brief Description of Project : APPLICATION TO REZONE APPROXIMATELY 0.17 ACRE OF PROPERTY FROM R-4 TO B-1 FOR FUTURE PROFESSIONAL OFFICE. LOCATION : LOCATED AT 636 SHATTUCK AVENUE SOUTH. SITE AREA : 0.17 ACRE BUILDING AREA (gross) N/A DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) : N/A IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1 ) Topographic changes : 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : 3) Water & water courses : 4) Plant life : 5 ) Animal life : 6) Noise : 7) Light & glare : 8 ) Land Use ; . north : east : south : west : Land use conflicts : View obstruction : - 9) Natural resources : 10 ) Risk of upset : 11 ) Population/Employment : 12 ) Number of Dwellings : 13 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) : traffic impacts : 14) Public services :, 15 ) Energy : 16 ) Utilities : 17 ) Human health : 18 ) Aesthetics : 19 ) Recreation : 20 ) Archeology/history : COMMENTS : • Recommendation: DNSI DOS More Information Reviewed by : Title : Date : D2-Qce • FORM: ERC-06 Date circulated : OCTOBER 1, 1984 Comments due : OCTOBER 9, 1984 ENVIROINIffiEMITAL CHECKLIST I ENVIER SHEET ECF - 100 _ 84 APPLICATION N o (s ) . R-098-84 (REZONE) PROPONENT : MICHAEL DONNELLY PROJECT TITLE : DONNELLY REZONE Brief Description of Project : APPLICATION TO REZONE APPROXIMATELY 0.17 ACRE OF PROPERTY FROM R-4 TO B-1 FOR FUTURE PROFESSIONAL OFFICE. LOCATION : LOCATED AT 636 SHATTUCK AVENUE SOUTH. SITE AREA : 0.17 ACRE BUILDING AREA (gross) N/A DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) : N/A IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1 ) Topographic changes : ✓ 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : ✓ 3) Water & water courses : 4) Plant life : L/ 5 ) Animal life : ✓ 6) Noise : 7 ) Light & glare : 8 ) Land Use ; . north : east : south : west : Land use conflicts : View obstruction : 9 ) Natural resources : 1.7 10 ) Risk of upset : ✓ 11 ) Population/Employment : 12 ) Number of Dwellings : • 13 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) : traffic impacts : 14 ) Public services : !� ' 15 ) Energy : r/ 16 ) Utilities : (/ 17 ) Human health : 18 ) Aesthetics : 19 ) Recreation : 20 ) Archeology/history : COMMENTS : Recommendation : DNSI K DOS More Information Reviewed by : / -- , Title : Date : ./6,,k4'Y FORM: ERC-06 ---,: _ ( T►urIE5 Date circulated : OCTOBER 1, 1984 Comments due : OCTOBER_ °- 1984 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET ECF - 100 - 84 APPLICATION No (s ) . R-098-84 (REZONE) PROPONENT : MICHAEL DONNELLY PROJECT TITLE : DONNELLY REZONE Brief Description of Project : APPLICATION TO REZONE APPROXIMATELY 0.17 ACRE OF PROPERTY FROM R-4 TO B-1 FOR FUTURE PROFESSIONAL OFFICE. LOCATION : LOCATED AT 636 SHATTUCK AVENUE SOUTH. SITE AREA : 0.17 ACRE' BUILDING AREA (gross) N/A DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) : N/A IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1 ) Topographic changes : ✓ 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : 3 ) Water & water courses : V 4) Plant life : / 5 ) Animal life : ✓ 6) Noise : ✓ 7) Light & glare : ✓ 8 ) Land Use ; . north: east : ' south : west : ' Land use conflicts : View obstruction : 9) Natural resources : 10 ) Risk of upset : ✓ 11 ) Population/Employment : 12 ) Number of Dwellings : ✓ 13 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) : traffic impacts : ,14) Public services : 17 15 ) Energy : l✓ 16 ) Utilities : V 17 ) Human health : _ I✓ 18 ) Aesthetics : V _ 19 ) Recreation : V 20 ) Archeology/history : _ V COMMENTS : Recommendation : U ' I 1 DOS More Information /�► Reviewed .by : To_,/ Title: 077L/77 E7aa4 ,,E,EE Date : /D — /6) - 8 . : FORM: ERC-06 TR FF-se,. Date circulated : OCTOBER 1, 1984 Comments due : OCTOBER 9, 1984 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECIKLIST REVIEW SHEET ECF - 100 - 84 APPLICATION N o (s ) . R-098-84 (REZONE) PROPONENT : MICHAEL DONNELLY PROJECT TITLE : DONNELLY REZONE Brief Description of Project : APPLICATION TO REZONE APPROXIMATELY 0.17 ACRE OF PROPERTY FROM R-4 TO B-1 FOR FUTURE PROFESSIONAL OFFICE. LOCATION : LOCATED AT 636 SHATTUCK AVENUE SOUTH. SITE AREA : 0.17 ACRE BUILDING AREA (gross) N/A DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) : N/A IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1 ) Topographic changes : 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : 3) Water & water courses : ✓ 4) Plant life : e.--- ' 5 ) Animal life : 6 ) Noise : 7 ) Light & glare : .4°- ---- 8 ) Land Use ; . north : east : south : west : Land use conflicts : View obstruction : 9 ) Natural resources : L-�' _ � 10 ) Risk of upset : - 11 ) Population/Employment : '"" 12 ) Number of Dwellings : a.®- 13 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) : traffic impacts : 14 ) Public services : 15 ) Energy : 16 ) Utilities : _ 17 ) Human health : 18 ) Aesthetics : - 19 ) Recreation : 20 ) Archeology/history : COMMENTS : Recommendation : DNSI t' eS More Information Reviewed by : �� r, 1. me- tle : / i ���;- ,s/ Date : 9 /Y0. 7 FORM: ERC-06 P'INr-1ss V) Date circulated : OCTOBER 1, 1984 Comments due : OCTOBER. 9, 1984 EINIVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIIEU SHEET ECF - 100 _ 84 APPLICATION No (s) . R-098-84 (REZONE) PROPONENT : MICHAEL DONNELLY PROJECT TITLE : DONNELLY REZONE Brief Description of Project : APPLICATION TO REZONE APPROXIMATELY 0.17 ACRE OF PROPERTY FROM R-4 TO B-1 FOR FUTURE PROFESSIONAL OFFICE. LOCATION : LOCATED AT 636 SHATTUCK AVENUE SOUTH. SITE AREA : 0.17 ACRE BUILDING AREA (gross) N/A DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) : N/A IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE 1 ) Topographic changes : 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : 3) Water & water courses : 4) Plant life : 5 ) Animal life : 6) Noise : 7) Light & glare : 8 ) Land Use ; • north : east : south : west : Land use conflicts : View obstruction : 9) Natural resources : 10 ) Risk of upset : 11 ) Population/Employment : 12 ) Number of Dwellings : 13 ) Trip ends ( ITE) : traffic impacts : 14 ) Public services : 15 ) Energy : _ 16 ) Utilities : 17 ) Human health : 18) Aesthetics : 19 ) Recreation : 20 ) Archeology/history : _ COMMENTS : Recommendation : DNSI 2 DOS More Information o —Reviewed by : 12P,, � , ^ Title : /a«„_t Date : — FORM: ERC-06 Date circulated : OCTOBER 1, 1984 Comments due : OCTOBER 9, 1984 _ ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET ECF - 100 _ 84 APPLICATION No (s ) . R-098-84 (REZONE) PROPONENT : MICHAEL DONNELLY ;OCT 1 1984 PROJECT TITLE : DONNELLY REZONE Brief Description of Project : APPLICATION TO REZONE APPROXIMATELY 0.17 ACRE OF PROPERTY FROM R-4 TO B-1 FOR FUTURE PROFESSIONAL OFFICE. LOCATION : LOCATED AT 636 SHATTUCK AVENUE SOUTH. SITE AREA : 0.17 ACRE BUILDING AREA (gross) N/A DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) : N/A IMPACT REVIEW' NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1 ) Topographic changes : 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : 3 ) Water & water courses : 4) Plant life : 5 ) Animal life : 6 ) Noise : 7) Light & glare : 8 ) Land Use ; . north : east : south : west : Land use conflicts : View obstruction : 9) Natural resources : 10 ) Risk of upset : 11 ) Population/Employment : 12 ) Number of Dwellings : 13 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) : traffic impacts : 14 ) Public services : !/ 15 ) Energy : 16 ) Utilities : 17 ) Human health : 18 ) Aesthetics : 19 ) Recreation : 20 ) Archeology/history : COMMENTS : /"/',7o¢%/' o/c 6a ,44( c5A?// lee- c?// /75/ d2 dl%:7z��o�r ) er-1 ��y U.Pe � CJI— ��rye 'd 1�J Recommendation : DNSI_ DOS More Information_ Reviewed by Date : / /o FORM: ERC-06 •�( Y. ® ~TTY . OF RENTO - FILE NO(S): �i - a '-p � • �;, ® ` • BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMEI T c GF- /vo -py mu -N� MASTER APPLICATION NOTE TO APPLICANT: Since this is a comprehensive application form, only those items related to your specific type of application(s) ore to be completed. (Please print or type. Attach additional sheets if necessary.) • APPLICANT TYPE OF APPLICATION NAME _ MY C/z/.e1�_L / . ,OO/1141�Li--�,/ FEES Qr REZONE*(FROM /?-1/ TO 8-/ ) ADDRESS 436 S'f/4/i1,e6e UG So 0 SPECIAL PERMIT* CITY ZIP TEMPORARY PERMIT* R��T� /i 9e-as6" Q CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT* TELEPHONE En SITE PLAN APPROVAL SPECIAL PERMIT FOR GRADE AND FILL a 3S- 0 97f No. of Cubic Yards: CONTACT PERSON VARIANCE* From Section: NAME 4✓//C�i¢tZ 7 _ ,d0/U Al�Z Ly 0,� * Justification Required ko CY/l/7?7y,4 41. /C/1f' P v i ADDRESSS SUBDIVISIONS: (q 3 6 ' ,5 4% /UC/<' AOL ;Co Q SHORT PLAT CITY Al ZIP Q TENTATIVE PLAT ia- I TO w/Is/4 9j'c6. 0 PRELIMINARY PLAT TELEPHONE Q FINAL PLAT Ac35--- 097 8 0 WAIVER (Justification Required) OWNER NO. OF LOTS: NAME /1/Cf/A1tZ j . ,,dAJ/./&LLY PLAT NAME: C-YN T7�/A- "2'7 . /(/P)-?P d ADORES PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: 36, sr7/ATrzccx v� sv Q PRELIMINARY CITA&i?)A) A.)4sv-I 9gos6 ZIP 0 FINAL P.U.D. NAME: TELEPHONE 023 5- 0 9 7 s' 0 Residential Q Industrial ElCommercial 0 Mixed LOCATION MOBILE HOME PARKS: PROPERTY ADDRESS RE/UTOA) ( (A)/1 S/1 6,36 5 'A�fr �� s0 Q TENTATIVE EXISTING USE /Q€S/Q&N T7/1-L PRESENT ZONING O PRELIMINARY R_Z, tJ FINAL PROPOSED USE PARK NAME: . i P2O -.55/OAJ/7L. ©e / /Cg- NUMBER OF SPACES: f I r ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE ' SQ. FT. ACRES kr. TOTAL FEES AREA: 74Z7(0 & /7 CITY OF RENTON D� T STAFF}� USE ONLY -- ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESSING ip @ 0 W r; APPLICATION RECEIVED BY: ® �f APPLICATION DETERMINED TO BE: S ER 2`�4 0 Accepted E1Incomplete Notification Sent On By: BUILDING/ZQNItNIj nppl, (Initials) , DATE ROUTED ADDITIONAL MATERIAL RECEIVED BY: 1 0 - I 1 84- APPLICATION DETERMINED TO BE: EDAccepted QIncomplete Notification Sent On By: (Initials) ROUTED TO: Ili �ry1, Building Design Eng. Fire 21 Parks I Police Policy Dev. ® Traffic Eng. En Utilities) REVISED 1=31-84 Legal description of property (if more space is required, attach a separate sheet). LOTS /D //. � /3LDrI 4 , sm ,9bL /77 OA/ 70 77I 77 Gv 4l O ir �i lJi 7 7L't/ / ,qc ,e_z /Al Gr TU 77-1 A'4A- '` /,t/ l>'O L uj4,7� /6 c PIA TS, L33 ' //f/ /Ai C26.cA/7Y / r�,T—s/'/A/67Z) . AFFIDAVIT M fC/{,4L L 7: epdNN G)' I, GYtiT//-/A 17/_ k/,.Ab , being duly sworn, declare that I am ' El authorized representative to act for the property owner;Mowner of the property involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge • and belief. SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN 0 BEFORE ME THIS DAY OF 19,1. NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, RESIDING AT • ,7)t r���a Zi) (Name of Notary (Signature(Si nature of Owner) 1(7 / eC�d7 � Cf;�7G 36 sly'/CCe� /E sc7 A e (Address ) ddr ss - ( ) s i,v:_,a '(• ' A5v z4 9(O 5J (City) (Stafe) (Zip)• - 0,97/ g6414/—%J a23 —DV Zd'—/I (Telephone) Acceptance of •this application and required filing fee does not constitute a complete application. Plans and other materials required to constitute a complete application are listed in the "Application Procedure." Foxm #174 4111 .0404 ' Michael T. Donnelly D.D.S. Family Dentistry MY OF RENTON SEP271984 September 28, 1984 ,tLDING/ZONING DEPT. City of Renton Building & Zoning Department Renton, Washington RE: Rezone Proposal 636 Shattuck Ave. So. Renton, Washington 98055 Dear Roger Blaylock, The purpose of this letter is to establish the rationale for the development of a family dental practice in the above mentioned site. The remodel will accomodate the moving of my 4 year old den- tal practice now located at 231 South 4th Place (north of the site) . The lots are presently zoned multi-family R-4 and are located on the N.E. corner of 7th and Shattuck. The anticipated remodel will provide the extra space my dental practice needs while allowing it to remain in the downtown Renton area. In the event the remodel is not allowed I may be forced to seek space elsewhere in South King County. Seventh is a main arterial connecting Rainier Avenue to Renton City Center. Shattuck is an arterial connecting Renton Village Shopping Center to downtown Renton. Shattuck also provides access to Renton park and ride. The Renton airport final approach pat- tern creates a situation where 100% of daily air traffic passes approximately 200 feet directly overhead. The lots are bordered on the east side by a multi-level apartment complex with small kitchen windows facing the property, an auto wrecking yard borders on the south and southeast, the Renton park and ride is across the corner on the southwest, R-4 zoned single family dwelling exists to the north. A six foot fence surrounds much of the property. The proximity of this property to heavy industry such as Renton/ Issaquah auto freight, Bankers auto wrecking, and the very high volumn of auto, truck, and tractortrailer traffic makes this property unsuitable and undesirable as a single family dwelling due to the intense noise pollution and high carbon monoxide pollution during peak traffic hours. 231 South Fourth Place Renton, WA 98055 (206)271-8644 1111 The same set of circumstances make the property highly desirable to the public as the location of a professional building. Access for the disabled and elderly will be provided. The visual impact of the rezone/remodel will be improved while maintaining the existing residential appearance. This result will be achieved by maintenance of the existing structure and land- scape without major external additions. The external additions, planned include an outdoor stairway to the second story of the structure and an external cabinet to enclose four medical gas cylinders. The entire visual impact after remodeling will be one of improvement. New siding, roofing, painting and landscaping comprise the improvements. A portion of the lot will be changed into parking area. The garage will be removed to provide two of the parking stalls. Appropriate set-backs will be provided as required by code. The detraction of the additional pavement will be minimized by the exisitng 6 foot fence. In effect the residential appearance will be maintained thus providing a visual barrier between the R-4. multifamily zoning to the North and the light industry to the South. There will be no added noise, air, or visual detraction. Traffic congestion will not increase due to ample parking at the site and the proximity of the park and ride. The traffic flow to the dental clinic will not coincide with the high use periods which exist now at 6: 30 - 8: 00 a.m. and 3: 30 - 5:00 p.m. helping to.maintain congestion at current levels. There will be no adverse effects on the neighborhood. In addition the neighboring properties will enjoy an increase in value. I will agree to restrict utilization of the newly B-1 zoned site to office space only. I also will agree to restrict height and use of the subject site in order to avoid intrusion into surround- ing residential, commercial, and multifamily zones while en- hancing the desirable transitional effect as described in the comprehensive plan. I feel, all factors considered, that this proposal is an excellent alternative to the present zoning. It will help provide a suit- able transition between the variety of zonings surrounding the subject site. In general, this proposal is appropriate as it complies with the intent of the comprehensive plan though it does not comply with all of the specifics. It is timely as it will provide a transition between the developing light industry and commercial zonings and the slow to develop R-4 zoning. It will provide for the exisitng community need being serviced now on South 4th Place. Public improvements will be made as required by conditions set forth by the reviewing departments. Sincerely, Nbehe,r1 Michael T. Donnelly, DDS MTD/cmk 1 f t - - _ITV OF RENTON CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON p E_ Q D ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM SEP 2 7 1984 BUILDING/ZONING DEPT. • FOR OFFICE USE ONLY (� Application No. - 3 / Q 8 171 Environmental Checklist No. ECF— 1 6—a - 6 PROPOSED,, date: FINAL , date: 10 " 10 0 Declaration of Significance Declaration of Significance Declaration of Non-Significance g E Declaration of Non-Significance COMMENTS: Introduction The State Environmental Policy Act of 1971, Chapter 43.21C, RCW, requires all state and local governmental agencies to consider environmental values both for their own actions and when licensing private proposals. The Act also requires that an EIS be prepared for all major actions significantly affecting the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to help the agencies involved determine whether or not a proposal is such a major action. Please answer the following questions as completely as you can with the information presently available to you. Where explanations of your answers are required, or where you believe, an explanation would be helpful to government decision makers , include your explanation in the space provided, or use additional pages if necessary. You should include references to any reports or studies of which you are aware and which are rele- vant to the answers you provide. Complete answers to these questions now will help all agencies involved with your proposal to undertake the required environmental review with- out unnecessary delay. The following questions apply to your total proposal , not just to the license for which you are currently applying or the proposal for which approval is sought. Your answers should include the impacts which will be caused by your proposal when it is completed, even though completion may not occur until sometime in the future. This will allow all of the agencies which will be involved to complete their environmental review now, with- out duplicating paperwork in the future. NOTE: This is a standard form being used by all state and local agencies in the State of Washington for various types of proposals. Many of the questions may not apply to your proposal . If a question does not apply, just answer it "no" and continue on to the next question. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM I. BACKGROUND / / 1. Name of Proponent / ) (�f1' -/ % f/U`lv`e. 2. Address and phone number of Proponent: 21A -el )e ?16-71/ �tf O6�- 3. Date Checklist submitted 11 4. Agency requiring Checklist . + , N e r.�/0i4-7 C50T, 5. Name of proposal , if applicable: /" /t 6. Nature and brief description of the proposal (including but not limited to its size, general design elements, and other factors that will give an accurate understanding of its scope and nature) : a7_0 — y 4.6-0-1A-c.. aid Lc ig—/ l'.le 4 silil'1 O d./N7.Cf/� Gt /�11�7 /I SLl.f .--R-0 t, -2- 7. Location of proposal (describe the physical setting of the proposal , as well as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental impacts, including any other information needed to give an accurate understanding of the environ- mental setting of the proposal ) : ,rotd--71 j ) A 9) ' $53-- 8. Estimated date for completion of the proposal : /r j — /9g7' 9. List of all permits , licenses or government approvals required for the proposal (federal , state and local--including rezones) : 10. Do you have any plans for future additions , expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain: 77° 11. Do you know of any plans by others which may affect the property covered by your. proposal? If yes, explain: 12. Attach any other application form that has been completed regarding the pro- posal ; if none has been completed, but is expected to be filed at some future date, describe the nature of such application form:, V( II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required) (1) Earth. Will the proposal result in: (a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? PC Yt MAYBE NTl (b) Disruptions, displacements , compaction or over- covering of the soil? YES MAYBE NO (c) Change in topography or ground surface relief features? YE — MAY (d) The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? YU- MAYBE (e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site? YET— MAYBE NO. (f) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream 'or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? Yamn MAYBE in— Explanation& ' • ¢ c- 2r-64-e sir Y_C .L �e" 1'��-C.`�l&J� �-mac gLdhk • i -3- • (2) Air. ' Will the proposal result in: (a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality?' YES RATITE f (b) The creation of objectionable odors? Y MAYBE (c) Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? YES MAYBE N Explanation: (3) Water. Will the proposal result in: (a) Changes in currents, or the course of direction of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? YES MAYBE NO (b) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? a� VET— WIT FF1 (c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? YES M'AYB N� (d) Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? • ' Y MAYBE ND (e) Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? YES MAYBE NO (f) Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? VET— MAYBE NO (g) Change in the quantity of ground waters , either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? YES MAYBE NO (h) Deterioration in ground water quality, either through direct injection, or through the seepage of leachate, phosphates, detergents, waterborne virus or bacteria, or other substances into the ground waters? IrsE — MIT Off (i ) Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? YES MAYBE, Explanation: (4) Flora. Will the proposal result in: (a) 'Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of flora (including trees, shrubs , grass, crops, 54 microflora and aquatic plants)? YES MAYBE 0— (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered, species of flora? YET MAYBE N- (c) Introduction of new species of flora into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing )41 species? YES- )4AY.BE TRY— (d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? MAYBE 4" Explanation: -4- (5) Fauna. Will the proposal result In: • (a) Changes in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of fauna (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms , r� insects or microfauna)? Yam- MATTE NO (b) Reduction of'the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of fauna? YES MAYBE NO (c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an area, • or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of fauna? MAYBE NO (d) Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? V gATTE Explanation: (6) Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise levels? ,bC YES MAYBE NO Explanation: (7) Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or glare? YES MAYBE 0— Explanation: (8) Land Use. Will the proposal result in the alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? Y S WEE 0- Explanation 6„, _. 2l. C (9) Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: (a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? l� YET— MAYBE NO (b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? Y MAYBE N Explanation: (10) Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (Including, but not limited to, oil , pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? 9€ '- MAYBE 0— Explanation: (1.1) Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distri- bution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? YET- kAYBE Explanation: -5- (12) Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or • create a demand for additional housing? 5. VET- MAYBE NO Explanation: (13) Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in: (a) Generation of additional vehicular movement? YES M YBE NO (b) Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? YE VOTE N6- (c) Impact upon existing transportation systems? Y! MAYBE N- (d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? . Yam- RUE (e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? Yam- MAYBE NO (f) 'Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? VEE- MAYBE — Explanation Z1e c Lcr&- te_ez, --2ee,A,"t G�t}//�® � s 77 • G �La3� a2c12. peA6e.,k, /- (14) ' Public Servi ' •'s. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas : (a) Fire protection? YES MAYBE WO-- (b) Police protection? YES- RATITE NO (c) Schools? 54 YES MAYBE N$. (d) Parks or other recreational facilities? YES MAYBE NO (e) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? YES MAYBE NO (f) Other governmental services? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: (15) Energy. Will the proposal result in: (a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? Vf— AMIE Ao (b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? YES MAYBE Explanation: (16) Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or alterations to the following utilities: (a) Power or natural gas? YES MAYBE FO (b) Communications systems? T E 0 (c) Water? YES MAYBE NO , Yy r, �. -6- (d) Sewer or septic tanks? ),- YES MAYBE NO (e) Storm water drainage? YES UTNE NO (f) Solid waste and disposal? YES MITE F1 Explanation: • (17) Human Health. Will the proposal result in the creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? yEs- MAYBE N3 • Explanation: (18) Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the ,creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? , MAYBE Explanation: (19) Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? YET- MAYBE f Explanation: (20) Archeological/Historical . Will the proposal result in an alteration 'of a significant archeological or historical site, structure, object or building? YET- MAYBE Explanation: • III. SIGNATURE I , the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any decla- ration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. - Proponent: s gned / /le-;40 (name printe / • City of Renton Planning Department 5-76 I OF RENTON _,1 • 2 111W � p SEP271984 • TICOR TITLE INSURANCE BUILDING/ZONING DEPT Commitment for Title Insurance TICOR TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA, (a stock company), a California corporation, herein called the Company,for a valuable consideration, hereby commits to issue its policy or policies of title insurance,as identified in Sched- ule A, in favor of the proposed insured named in Schedule A,as owner or mortgagee of the estate or interest covered hereby in the land described or referred to in Schedule A, upon payment of the premiums and charges therefor; all subject to the provisions of Schedules A and B and to the Conditions and Stipulations hereof. This Commitment shall be effective only when the identity of the proposed insured and the amount of the policy or policies committed for have been inserted in Schedule A hereof by the Company,either at the time of the issuance of this Commitment or by subsequent endorsement. This Commitment is preliminary to the issuance of such policy or policies of title insurance and all liability and obligations hereunder shall cease and terminate one hundred eighty(180)days after the effective date hereof or when the policy or policies committed for shall issue, whichever first occurs, provided that the failure to issue such policy or policies is not the fault of the Company. TICOR TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA ByI President Attest /c Secretary COPYRIGHT.1966—AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION TO 2299 WA(4-84)American Land Title Association Commitment-1966 Conditions and Stipulations 1. The term mortgage, when used herein, shall include included under the definition of insured in the form of deed of trust, trust deed, or other security instrument. policy or policies committed for and only for actual loss 2. If the proposed insured has or acquires actual knowl- incurred in reliance hereon in undertaking in good faith (a) edge of any defect, lien, encumbrance, adverse claim or to comply with the requirements hereof,or(b)to eliminate other matter affecting the estate or interest or mortgage exceptions shown in Schedule B,or(c)to acquire or create thereon covered by this Commitment other than those the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this shown in Schedule B hereof,and shall fail to disclose such Commitment. In no event shall such liability exceed the knowledge to the Company in writing, the Company shall amount stated in Schedule A for the policy or policies be relieved from liability for any loss or damage resulting committed for and such liability is subject to the insuring from any act of reliance hereon to the extent the Company provisions,the Conditions and Stipulations,and the Exclu- is prejudiced by failure to so disclose such knowledge. If sions from Coverage of the form of policy or policies the proposed insured shall disclose such knowledge to the committed for in favor of the proposed insured which are Company or if the Company otherwise acquires actual hereby incorporated by reference and are made a part of knowledge of any such defect, lien, encumbrance, ad- this Commitment except as expressly modified herein. verse claim or other matter,the Company at its option may 4. Any action or actions or rights of action that the pro- amend Schedule B of this Commitment accordingly, but posed insured may have or may bring against the Com- such amendment shall not relieve the Company from liabil- pany arising out of the status of the title to the estate or ity previously incurred pursuant to paragraph 3 of these interest or the status of the mortgage thereon covered by Conditions and Stipulations. this Commitment must be based on and are subject to the 3. Liability of the Company under this Commitment shall provisions of this Commitment. be only to the named proposed insured and such parties Schedule of Exclusions from Coverage THE EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE REFERRED TO IN PARAGRAPH 3 OF THE CONDITIONS AND STIPULATIONS ARE AS FOLLOWS: OWNER'S POLICY FORM B-1970 LOAN POLICY 1. Any law, ordinance or governmental regulation (includ- 1. Any law, ordinance or governmental regulation (includ- ing but not limited to building and zoning ordinances) re- ing but not limited to building and zoning ordinances) re- stricting or regulating or prohibiting the occupancy, use or stricting or regulating or prohibiting the occupancy, use or enjoyment of the land, or regulating the character, dimen- enjoyment of the land, or regulating the character, dimen- sions or location of any improvement now or hereafter sions or location of any improvement now or hereafter erected on the land, or prohibiting a separation in own- erected on the land, or prohibiting a separation in own- ership or a reduction in the dimensions or area of the land, ership or a reduction in the dimensions or area of the land, or the effect of any violation of any such law, ordinance or or the effect of any violation of any such law, ordinance or governmental regulation. governmental regulation. 2. Rights of eminent domain or governmental rights of 2. Rights of eminent domain or governmental rights of police power unless notice of the exercise of such rights police power unless notice of the exercise of such rights appears in the public records at Date of Policy. appears in the public records at Date of Policy. 3. Defects,liens,encumbrances,adverse claims,or other 3. Defects,liens,encumbrances,adverse claims,or other matters(a)created,suffered,assumed or agreed to by the matters(a)created,suffered,assumed or agreed to by the insured claimant; (b) not known to the Company and not insured claimant; (b) not known to the Company and not shown by the public records but known to the insured shown by the public records but known to the insured claimant either at Date of Policy or at the date such claimant either at Date of Policy or at the date such claimant acquired an estate or interest insured by this pol- icy or acquired the insured mortgage and not disclosed in writing by the insured claimant to the Company prior to the date such insured claimant became an insured hereunder; (c) resulting in no loss or damage to the insured claimant; (d) attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy(ex- cept to the extent insurance is afforded herein as to any statutory lien for labor or material). 4. Unenforceability of the lien of the insured mortgage claimant acquired an estate or interest insured by this pol- because of failure of the insured at Date of Policy or of any icy and not disclosed in writing by the insured claimant to subsequent owner of the indebtedness to comply with the Company prior to the date such insured claimant be- applicable"doing business" laws of the state in which the came an insured hereunder; (c) resulting in no loss or land is situated. damage to the insured claimant; (d) attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy; or (e) resulting in loss or damage which would not have been sustained if the in- sured claimant had paid value for the estate or interest in- sured by this policy. l I • SCHEDULE A Commitment no. Effective date of commitment: A-328958 U-9 SEPTEMBER 25, 1984 AT 8:00 A.M. Your no. : KIMPO / DONNELLY Prepared for: CYNTHIA KIMPO AND MICHAEL DONNELLY 636 SHATTUCK AVENUE SOUTH RENTON, WASHINGTON 98055 ATTN: CYNTHIA KIMPO Inquiries should be directed to: Ticor Title Insurance Company 1008 Western Avenue, Suite 200 Seattle, Washington 98104 Attn: RICHARD E. BREVERLY DIRECT DIALING (206) 223-7901 1. Policy or policies to be issued: American Land Title Association Owners/purchasers policy - FORM B - 1970 Coverage: STANDARD Amount : $75,000.00 RENEWAL Premium = $85.00 Tax $6.72 Proposed insured: CYNTHIA KIMPO AND MICHAEL DONNELLY, BOTH SINGLE 2. The estate or interest in the land described or referred to in this commitment and covered herein is: FEE SIMPLE ESTATE 3. Title to said estate or interest in said land is at the effective date hereof vested in: MICHAEL -T. DONNELLY, AN UNMARRIED MAN AT DATE OF ACQUIRING TITLE, AND CYNTHIA H. KIMPO, AN UNMARRIED WOMAN AT DATE OF ACQUIRING TITLE . A-328958 PAGE 1 • 4. The land referred to in this commitment is located in the county of King., State of Washington, and described as follows: LOTS 10 AND 11, BLOCK 6, SMITHERS FIFTH ADDITION TO THE TOWN OF RENTON, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 16 OF PLATS, PAGE 33, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. A-328958 PAGE 2 SCHEDULE B 1 . The following are the requirements to be complied with: A. Instruments necessary to create the estate or interest to be insured must be properly executed, delivered and duly filed for record. 11 Schedule B of the policy or policies to be issued will contain exceptions to the following matters unless the same are disposed of to the satisfaction of the company: SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS: 1. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters, if any, created, first appearing in the public records or attaching subsequent to the effective date hereof but prior to the date the proposed insured acquires for value of record the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this commitment. 2. Lien of real estate excise sales tax upon any sale of said premises, if unpaid. The property described lies within: RENTON Present rate of real estate excise tax as of the date herein is: 1.322 3. GENERAL TAXES, as follows, plus interest and/or penalties after delinquency: For year Amount billed Amount paid 1984 S625.37 $312.69 Being County Treasurer's parcel no. 784130-0525-08 4. DEED OF TRUST to secure an indebtedness of the amount herein stated and any other amounts payable under the terms thereof, recorded in the Department of Records and Elections of King County, Washington. Amount : $66,150.00 Dated : MAY 17, 1982 Recorded : MAY 21, 1982 Receiving no.: 8205210386 Grantor : MICHAEL T. DONNELLY, AN UNMARRIED MAN AND CYNTHIA M. KIMPO, AN UNMARRIED WOMAN Trustee : PIONEER NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY Beneficiary : PACIFIC WEST MORTGAGE COMPANY. , INC. A-328958 PAGE 3 The beneficial interest under said deed of trust was assigned by instrument Dated : MAY 21, 1982 Recorded : MAY 27, 1982 Receiving no.: 8205270660 Assigned to : SECURITY PACIFIC MORTGAGE CORPORATION 5. JUDGMENT for the amount herein stated and any other amounts due. Creditor : BEN HARWOOD AND JOSEPHINE HARWOOD Debtor : MICHAEL DONNELLY Amount. : $1075.00 Dated : MAY 19, 1983 Filed : MAY 19, 1983 Judgment no. : 83-9-07361-3 Case no. : 82-2-11079-5 Attorney for creditor: DAVID R. WOHL The effect said matter has on the premises under search depends upon the identity of the debtor with MICHAEL T. DONNELLY + + + + + + + ALTA MATTERS: The OWNER'S POLICY applied for will not insure against those matters listed as additional exceptions on the inside back cover hereof. + + + + + + NOTE: Investigation should be made to determine if there are any service, installation, maintenance or construction charges for sewer, water, garbage or electricity. • NOTE: A consolidated statement of all charges and advances in connection with this order will be provided at closing. NOTE: In event the transaction fails to close and this commitment is cancelled, a fee will be charged to comply with the state insurance code and the filed schedule of this company. YG/PMCC 888 A-328958 PAGE 4 ALTA RESIDENTIAL TITLE INSURANCE POLICY-1979 3. Title Risks: 1. Governmental police power, and the existence or viola- • that are created, allowed or agreed to by you tion of any law or government regulation. This includes • that are known to you, but not to us,on the Policy Date— building and zoning ordinances and also laws and regula- unless they appeared in the public records tions concerning; ■ that result in no loss to you • land use • land division • that first affect your title after the Policy Date—this does • improvements on the land • environmental protection not limit the labor and material lien coverage in Item 8 of This exclusion does not limit the zoning coverage de- Covered Title Risks. scribed in Items 12 and 13 of Covered Title Risks. 4. Failure to pay value for your title. 2. The right to take the land by condemning it, unless a 5. Lack of a right: notice of taking appears in the public records on the Policy • to any land outside the area specifically described and Date. referred to in Item 3 of Schedule A, or • in streets, alleys or waterways that touch your land. This exclusion does not limit the access coverage in Item 5 of Covered Title Risks. NOTE: THE POLICY COMMITTED FOR MAY BE EXAMINED BY INQUIRY AT THE OFFICE WHICH ISSUED THE COMMITMENT,AND A SPECIMEN COPY OF THE POLICY FORM (OR FORMS)REFERRED TO IN THIS COMMITMENT WILL BE FURNISHED PROMPTLY UPON REQUEST. ADDITIONAL EXCEPTIONS WHICH MAY,ACCORDING TO SCHEDULE B OF THIS COMMITMENT,BE SET FORTH AS EXCEPTIONS IN SCHEDULE B OF THE POLICY APPLIED FOR: A. Encroachments or questions of location, boundary and G. Exceptions and reservations in United States Patents. area,which an accurate survey may disclose. H. General taxes not now payable; matters relating to B. Public or private easements, streets, roads, alleys or special assessments and special levies, if any, preced- highways, unless disclosed of record by recorded plat ing the same becoming a lien. or conveyance, or decree of a court of record. I. Right of use, control or regulation by the United States C. Rights or claims of persons in possession,or claiming to of America, in the exercise of powers over navigation. be in possession, not disclosed by the public records. J. Any prohibition or limitation on the use, occupancy or D. Material or labor liens, or liens under the Workmen's improvement of the land resulting from the rights of the Compensation Act not disclosed by the public records. public or riparian owners to use any waters which may E. Water rights or matters relating thereto. cover the land. F. Any service, installation or construction charges for sewer, water, electricity, or garbage removal. �r J TICOR TITLE Ticor Title Insurance Company of California 6300 Wilshire Boulevard • P.O. Box 92792 Los Angeles,CA 90009 (213)852-6000 • LANDING OF FILE FILE TITLE � - DAB- elzU i