Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
LUA88-091
• II -- 0 / -,7 f 1 \v,,, A - . 11 ; / / O� k II *. \-1k7,3,5:9i / . \ \+>--x 1, - RESIDENT I ` • o \_ ~ ii0 1 �a K i �'( i, P R K i 1 J 1 a t x x 1 c-• I II 7 r X 1i NON* I I N184 in • o D i I I40 N t•*-�' L• 420 ,�-N O II TR. I O " . 1 X 6T H�PL N i 1 1 , '8, ( I I �I fF 11 li' O II I 40� 2 q -4 y) 1 1 ii 0 Is 1 I xx , p N 183,749.0841` I II .I1 EI671,255.96� I I rx Q 1 _ I ti_ ci,- ___ ' bj � II i� I X, ! Z I Y I o,. ,/ • a a , . , F (1/ TREES H AVE N _ _ • I1 II l_ _ �^^ _ _ _� _ _�^1 1 409 I' 11,, , � , ,L 0II 0 b • i •_ 1I 1 I1 , 1 bag A I I ` 1\ , TREES I L I Nld I 1 • II II 1� i � I a � = 1 j II ❑ 3 I LA--1 � 1 i '� '� 11 \ -1 1 0 a I - � I ❑ apt ❑ /ow 1 1 T. -- .__ _ _mod1 �°1 I X I %� 4-r�-__AVE, N `III \:-..s, i- ; ❑ 1 I S] .1 p 0 , \, x p 1 1 1 0 11 I 0 , 16-1-wi �_ I. 1 - - °J 1 s 8 U I I Hie a 1 1 x --ti 2__ ,1 1 1 ii- 0 in . i Id DIM C3x � a 0-*--1---..--ll ' aot l 11. f1 � t ❑ I I ' x dI i ■ I t it `x 1 . i ` t t INN Et i I I �u : \ LQaDoi a _y_ _J400 - ;. , x\► _ ---- - xfie=__ _ — / sig W 110 I fTR. � 0 eV I \ I I I vo ir---- -----41-- -----sopA t� F:rix.. ,‘..1.„ . .... j If 1 \ ..rv%+.- - . 102309318..0.04' , '111W -RUSSELLvFRANKLINALEAARION7i1652 . , 220232711rAVE !SE 0 41- tiAPLEVAL:LEY3W 98038 : 102305!'.932505'. ' GCGASSOCIATES, . • A31749.. • P0AIOX14148- 'AtELLEVUEWA :98009'- . 102309007.1'00 ARENTOWSCH00LDISU403' -• “712717 . :4351MAIWAVE5 . 0 ;RENTONWA' 98055' ,A.i,vviim,TvTvwFvirspes4* *********!te**41114**# 4cBATCHqNUMBER *: )CUStOMERINAME ; ; JOHWOODEY2 04.2100=0210t03 , j HEYNESAi14 • ' AO* 727fSHELTONJAVENE ' • • AZENTONCWA:, ' 98055 1 • " : • - 042100=,0240011 • 3901 !.14E7TH,, ' AZENTOWWA: 98055 ; 042100...q)25008 • '860572 ; ' 164287SE149THiST RENTOWWV: 98056!. 042100-P0260-06- • 'LAWGEORGE 'CO477, • - '69ESHELTOWAVEAtIE ' ;RENTON-WA , 98055 . 042100-0345-0• 5 ,UNITEDSAVJNGSLOAN : BANK629999' 601. SJACKSOWST , - SEATTLE :WA ,98104 0421004-035536 AlOCHNALTER !EDWINA.. • A02705 718-,SNELT0W:AVENE' RENTONIWA- 98056. 04210Q03651'.00 'MARTIW,ATHEL1D+CINDY :K ' ' 739999 710 .:SHELTOWAVENE RENTOWWA • • . , 98056' •:•-• _ - - 0421000375=08' KNIGHTA1ANNYL! -,769999 : • T3912'NE: 7TWST: .421, tENTOWWA . 018056' COMMENTS ' . „. . . 04210002350,81:- • HL - 777]rr - -?: • 01400ALErJ0SEPH-0YH ;3900iNLE7tWST ,FENTOW,WA- 98055 •, . • ....• • • . -" 042100*024506 -HOWEEVELYW i439999: 1356811.39TW14.FSE ; • AtENT*WA -. • 98056' • • , . 042100.1.'02551.03 - jaiSICKARICHAME , • 454122 ' 703- SHELTON: AVE'NE' ARENTON ,WA 98056 : 04Z100*OZ455-PQ1 .: . . ALE.EjAMESH ' . . . .E0681I . . 4821KENTOESMOINESR04.207: -... , _KENTWA . - ,98031g A0421007035607 _ . . :WALIAtJWILLIAM;B; • • C0479.; 70MONTEWVOLtNE- - - . .. ;RENTON. .WA . , ) 98055 : . . 042100-0360-05 . ,. , . , • 4CINTOSHIMARViNJ '095778 ' 1.14622.7$ 172MYST : . , . ,RENTOWNA , - . 98058 . .. ,, . 0426040370-#03 ' JACKSON.I.JOHWO . , ,,.. ..'.. '• , 13637.4SEA0iTWIPLACE . ,..k , ,-- fRENTONAV , _ 9.8055-, _ 02100403804,01\ ,.. . tilRISOWW;A • . •057.8- ' e--• • !3916JNE7T17F,ii:L. ',. . AtENTOWWA- ..' . . ,98055= .: -,- .-11;.,_q ' •. ' • . • S „ 04z100-v44v-v.1/ ` - • . . VENTIN1VINCENT.iT#HEIDI:;.J; '629999. ' 4005 ',NE '7TH >RENTON ',WA '. 98056' - ' -0421,00-045006` ..• • R ICE'WAYNE^C+DEBORAH it.' . !,469999 ;3911 :PNE&7TH"ST I: ` `s RENTON.'WA f - • • - .''98056 042;10040460-04` ' :THOMASI,TEDDY>RAY", ',201076' 682f SHELTON AVE.'.NE RENTON:,WA , ' 98056` - • apcierwrporwfoft ' 1.10DGESAIARK ;G :8068I, • 4012c,NE6TH1CT , AtENTOWW)!c 98055 ” !00105•9041+.01T." ' . „ \DY$ON,ROSE 101897' . . :67,3?UNIMCAVENE_. ENTOWWA . 98056 • 102305.'930905 • • .i.FREEMIRUSTEVEWV 0279 , • 13215, SE5120W . . tENTDN :WA . , ' 98055 - • : w • 102305=9324.r06! flORTERJOSEPWw . . 4G9999 ,766UNI0f;1 AVENE ' ;OENTOWWA ‘ • 498056 102305-9326,.04- • G .C' GFASSOCIATES: A179 • ' PD80X'74148 :8ELLEVUEAA . 98009'' ` 0421000390-09 . `LINOSEY . RONNIE)La '4004 'NE : 7TH:• ST ,RENTON :WA = ;98055 ,042100-0400-07f . 'B0MERSHETM ;TERRY: '671587, 34132y178TH`:PI ?SW xLYNNWOOD. WA 980374 ' 042100041005 .. `BRADFIELDJAMES :W `4016 '.NE 7TH" ST ` ;RENTON .WA 98055 042100404204..:03 : . 'CHAN: RAYMOND;.S ' -E0881 = . ' 679'UNION AVE ,NE ' ARENTON:WA . 98055, 042100=0430=01:°. ` KEENER 'HARVEY:A , = 1075 ;4013'NE7TH ' ST1 RENTON:WA 98055 4%. 042100-!.038506 GILMORE)LI 231579 4000NE7TH.: ST RENTOWWA ' 198056 . • • - , - • • • 042100-t0395-.04- . 'SLAUGHTER)CLAUOE R . :359999_ "21615A.05TH;PLSE - ' A(ENT34A ' 98032'. 0421001"-0405-!02, ' MEINDERV. DONAMG 7511UNIOWAVEAE : RENTONAA ' >98055 , , • .• •.• . • 4. • .042100-q)41500' AIARLACHERJUNE 'C0479 ' 19710SE277TWS•r : KEN7',.WV 98031 " -042100•0425-!08- . AEIRENTIVROBERT ,319999 4017 ,41E7TH, RENTOWRA: -98055 tptztuY7u,5w'uo , FREEZEJEANNElL :0278 . 400914E ;7TN ;ST , :RENTON :WA — 98055 . • . : 042100-0445-04! • • • MILLER ;FLORENCE : , :C8477' !4001NE7TEFSTI • - : :RENTON :WA , . • . : 98055 . , • .• . . •, • . n • . , - A - 042100t0455,0U :ROOIC,BRADLET:44+0E4.4NWJ: -.:609999 686.!.:SHEITOWNE' ZENTOWWA • , 98056 042100.r0465-09i.' :ARNOTIMICHAELI-SANDY:, 569999 ' 680!:SHEITOWAVENE RENT0NZWA I 98016' 880540',0060+09 SMITMGLEWHt -E0781 : - : 400614E61H1CT ,, , — • RENTONAA- • ,98055 ' 880540#008005' eASSAREWSUSAN-MARIA , • -500653'. ' 4018INE6TH;CT 12ENTOWWA - . • . ° n1880s r BreadWagon1880s a Bread Wagon1880s Bread Wagon1880s f Bread Wagon1880s °Bread Wagon1880s o Bread Wagon1880s 0 Bread Wagon1880s °Bread Wagon1880s o nSUsagon1880s 0 25uSA 0.25 uSA G 25USA 1880s o25U A 25uSA ° _ ° ' _ — a 25usa 25uSA 25uSA °25usn °25 25uSA ,. ° ° -1 ° ,' • -nr�,, IBA ` 11 !, �: �' i 1 ::,,,,„y', 0 ^II 'IN',,, ° "IP, 'II44 R,Y., ° 11 g��' � I 0 L_ 1IB � ° 11 B;h, 116 1 Y 1 '� will I .� ��B'uFc a 1 ', t • _9. cl '�.i_,_ Kf' , ah n `'1 1 r III m �, o I IBA s F I ° �, I -v� . y � ' � ii ^ y i, � µAll x Y r, ,,, r� �[u� Q�, .,' o ��-,-.. o i (FF4®�I -� o yTe`-��"� o-.� •. - .. 1"F9 �C t�:, Y� > !"�'f'µn�kY J fit,,. -� �, "a 1 o i ' �. i y 7i. I i Cali r,-, i _e E.� ihU °i Cu27 i ' ° __'�) "•`��4 0 1�4- l►. ° _...=17:ent.= c o •t / 1 al. Cia9J e ��. mg i .G� ,� -�4Y�. • . .. 1 i••t_ J,* 0 1i• �� ,v, o :—,� n i I, 7i S. hr ° ►.- d?u+�� 73149�-OAF� �L �.l Iaa �IV�1r� �Ad �Lt►'� o �i1 �IV�� o '..Ve'j�� o A 1�. �Le. Lt4 4./ 1.71� q, �1. - 0 4'i 1, I,V,I� r Q� 0 i�. P A �1 - -- - °- - - °- ° 9 BreadWagon1880s 0 Bread Wagon 0 BreadWagon1880s o i o BreadWagon1880s BreadWagon1880s BreadWagon1880s Wa 0 Breadgon1880s c s 25USA 0 25USA .025 uSA °25USA 25USA 25uSA on25USA ° / '_- -a 7 '® IP y1 i '7' ° EIo r T A ° II I,4 A 1. I Pl r R ° .I Ia, ,oil J a I �diµ ; L � 7Ia6 l It 0 I , VU d i44fv:1. 1 71..d o V71.VjV ° :.�%j../Lwj'� ,1.14* 4V14410 0 1.•4-01..��� • • Bread Wagon1880s n BeadWagon1880s BreadWagon1880s o BreadWagon1880s BmadWagon1880s 0 25USA a 25USA 25usA o 25usA. 25usn ° 1 Y��R.1'll ° 1� Ac, r j1I -o 0 1 al " (� �kP / 0 _E ' ' 1. • • • • • Bread Wagon 1880s Bread Wagon IE380s BmadN n 1880s o —— -- - — --` __ 25 USA 25 ag° Bread Wagon 1880s Bread Wagon 1880s BreadWagon 1880s o BreadWa 1880s o °25 USA o USA g� 25 US agon 1880s o US n 1880s o 25 US n 1880s o. Bread Wagon 1880s .• p� - °25 25 USA :25 USA 025us�' :25 USA 0025 USA_ 0 25 USA °25 USA A 25 USA 5 4,1 �LYI i vet •Br - G,-kFgy�igr4 a ,.� � 1' 'BR I o �. 0 1 � a�4,4Pt ��• �f o 1 �,I ° /�: �I .. 1 Y1ur��l� o •� q� , Ih. YIf II'' ° II1rr1 �r . ''rr++ - :.`.,� '�f1,w�l�,7 - 1��. •� ° .� •�u�,k i , '4 PIc o-lap. gr-� o - _RYIJ , 1 ,', 1_,, Y . 1 �I, �• j1 L ' o �� 1 '> �I.v II�V�Ii'� ° 7 IrD � i fro �� o yj►%�^ i /j�3 ���.�. o _I 1rt..w�,. •� �3,�. 0 A. 1 E ° 0' �ar o �. o 'ate r n iUiurls_-1Y ��, 1 1� • Av4 •i�� �:�' V1V 7iN IIl aa r i ° �� ° ��r o j� 'dvr o « rj`_ 4 0 11; o �% -- — o OA A.1 1•► ° "•<i� �1 � Aol �IS.�� 0 7. �j '"� ° ' Ir°�7` ° �7 _ o '�ti' j/7u � • - - a O ----, �� o vie 19 i�. o0011 �:� ♦,V�� TO ♦ �� 0 ., • • BreadWagnn1880s Bread Wagon]$SOs o BreadWa n]880s t�25 USA 25 USA o 25 USA BreadWagon 1880sUSA�n]880s : BreadWagon 1880s °BmadWagon 1880s o BreadWagon 1880s ° 25 25 .25 us o 25 USA .025 usA �RYI; • fR �G.• - tl� I�I :. --.' 1 Pat _0 pII k 11� o I� 4� ,14.RY; II ' cj� �•�- :• li. '` �� � CAI �� •: o Ni Ce�l Yr — . P.L t4Y. P.L L1 • 1 s' ,, .- to' .- _ ._/__.-__ A:6' Q >1 .. �� 21 MAX KIWANIS' PARK `= STD. tune • ' k GUTTER 0 12'2'-0' C.A.B. AS NEEDED - _ -I 8'3/4'-0' C.A.B. Z. , \ 4'A.C. CLASS'B. (TWO LIFTS) 1 I\, . _ , ., . Hi �1,1; 40j µq. n , . 411 \ ,fit r--1 4�5 N.E. 10th ST. a ,___ loci .i. *P 1 111 itz ' , . TREES - 44' / LL� RENTON. 1� N.E. 81h S7 I -113.29 a 56�1 0 .55 I Z N.E. 4th ST. 1 d TREES• g 'D LOCATION MAPtp. 1 4 SO FT 7421 O FT 7JN SOFT 7315 f0 N µTj . M 7451 SO \ AR ne SZ.o , "'111 - p1 3 Li g !.I : 1 '. ' •�•SC I _- CG, ' 7- CC, -••' I z 0��j r - . .u.w I W; '�/� to 1 a PREPARED FOR: ' ' m; I i SIEVE LUSA ' j�7 a a 18712 142nd N.E. 0 ►— / {E ao.u1 I• A1r o m._ �� �������J I N.E. 7tf1. CT \. �'� WOODINVILLE. WA. 98072 �� ., a • I ` ' C76] I. PHONE: 485-9090 'CL ....JJ a, . -� c2 a i (L' 4 ,..... 7898 SO .. 7337 SO rr 7329 SO FT ,.: 7492 SO n3 - Z_ ,o, 8b o.: . ''''' '''"-'''''1'''' ' • .'r AMP , 0 ...1.2 . cd . _ � j4 ! SCALE: 1"..s40' _ i P. " Y ALBERT BALCHS' RESIDENT' P. K NO, 4 °F • .L 'b. P.L C.L P 16. 1 l' . ".4" F *21 NAK . > -t„....imiii_r__. _.,....,—,:!caNwfam .KIWANIS PARK • " STD. CURB Z 'al OLMER O 1 12'2'-0' C.A.B. AS NEEDED _ 1 6'3/4' C.A.B. z 4'A.C. CUSS'B• (TWO 11FTS) i I - \\ 607glii I • P.I Pi a 405 u 4605 � 1i SEES , •Hot 4 5 44' LLI Os 710thN F, ST. f / = RENTON, N.E elh ST �I-2 .:113.29'. us _. •r ó '6.b6 1 Z N.E 4m ST. R ^ .< . . r ` - TREEB 'I:I LOCATION MAP ‘9. 4 S0 FT , 7421 0'----,-,*FT "7346 S0 FT 7315 s0 I '' 8/ .r-C‘i „ N) la VI ier- , . 2 E 1�ec - ) ec ' b - cc _—�• •' •�,. - • —b ' Q Z PREPARED FOR: fn. N --I- vai.11 � SIEVE LUSA '' ,,jam",:a ...ui 1 'JI. \} jfl98o72 "�' , N.E. 7thCT o .. WOO-� I090 • 0. 763J N 7437 •� Z o }��(( - _, ' 7696 SO_ 7337 SO FT 4 -7329 SO FT 6 7492 S0 hgS: � . Z W a' sz: ': , ,..,,-,..--' .-.:------7---",, --, to :....,i 8 r (45) 1 y I o x:. i2 ' eD,r---- �'�-*wn s SCALE: 1 =40' i T —ALBE,T BALCHS-I'RESIDEHT P K NL;-4 • °F • 2 J Malgarini 1058 Tacoma Ave. N.E. Renton, WA 98056 Fred: I would like the photographs returned to me in the event I appeal to the City Council . Thanks : 1 , ; S eN, -.-- John S . Malgarini R C VED F-EB2 _ 1989 CI IM Q s. . . : •••4.- . t i '4 ir.__Z-- IC .5.•. .� r - 0111111 lilt EXHIBIT # 1 41114111111 The home on the left belongs to Mr. Phil Barber (801 Union N.E. ) Drive-way is the only ingress & Exhibit # 3 Northerly side-yard of home show- ing drive-way-and So . side-yard of 807 Union N.E . A,:; r [1 °, - ,T. '� tit ,: 1 f' - } I OM 1- $111 . iIY1It priiir ...... Illikile.s.... I i EXHIBIT # 2 The rear of Mr . Barber ' s house and driveway turn-around i i L - , -:-_-_- _,L - ______ >_--1 wx...]___ . L.• II ' pr . - 1 Y • illirli '-• Ael .. ,i',$•. 0:: W.A . _ -.- - , EXHIBIT # 4 II Mr. Barber ' s home and the propert to the so th. (plat) Noteh w the property breaks ottt to the South and to the east . " .. a 6 �i�, t y T r ��lr--'4 '4 _ !-"R- /♦ • : et+ . . i i - • . .... 4 ... . , .. .. .. . - . .-e-, .... t, .- , , .:, w �. �_' art .� I ' ' i S 1 } j• ` EXHIBIT # 5 South side of home-looking east . note the fence and how the proper -ty is eroting into the adjoining • ' nrnnarty to tl•,o on„tl•, ti EXHIBIT # 6 •- South side of home looking east to Union Ave. '4y..7 Y . •.-.._:_•.'„,-*''''''-;.;-' :".!''\,,til$Wi...";', ...:. ' -•': '.--••,‘,., ,, _ - . 1 . . s,. .4} .• �C i'-!R ar :y , £ l'Vay.. y.. �w• . I• r �� 'Al x y �!. y .+° ;� ► �. •"� . +, �. ;. ...: l,. y'la`s *. EXHIBIT Ike 7 4 South side of home looking west Aloi to the rear of the home . Note how '� the dirt from the footings of the goor ,44 house have eroted to the south. JP,1 O. - 100 il, • , T i EXHIBIT # 8 "' ;•. : South-west corner of the home 1oot - -ing south-east- Note that the property starts to break-off abouta • 25 ft . from the back of the house .:* ' I. - _ y71 V Y M r t. •, ' �.....6...4'ir EXHIBIT # 9 ' Mr . Barber ' s home from the pro- --: posed plat site . Note how propert drops away to the south-easterly i. corner. .r. 't, / ._ t,.4 i y EXHIBIT # 10 V - The rear of Mr. Barber's propert ..'. il looking to the N.V. toward the 74- ; ,- • city park. (Kiwanis) e.. ' - ), • . 46. . ..,,, • • .., ‘,..: st 4 t. .... • •.....,i .. - . . ,, v,A '.-• 4:. - tr: -. • — ....... . ".....if,,,I•r., - --.r.:-...,.•:ffiaamigtoi.mmois.„i-- ,- -11111.!M. ;• • - -. _ . • - .1 -1'4k:/•••• 14....*el. .001140-1*„..,41,-1-• _ ,.•••‘,1,11,.. :..-tf..._Nr..• ‘.... ' _. 11' e:;-•-.4%, --''' - EXHIBIT # 11 '' The south property line showing 'k no break-away of the property to ' , . +ig, Jr the south. Very level , not as •;r. ''; indicated by developer. r i+'' .� . ti Ala.....:,- ,1.. ... • r r'. ✓ ., '{�',- -- . ... EXHIBIT # 12 South-easterly corner of the rea . . ., ,„.. 4e, e..t. ... yard. Note property is still level to the .southl AT P•o pePli . . . ..,•ct..., -•= • :,,-,- • • . ..-,. •- ... .. . ,. • . .. ,. .. .. .--. . , -, . . ,,..t.v.,: , I..- .p., - , . fi "- -. , s,_ . - . , -., . . ,, Atitoraii..„,_71,,•,,,....4 e a m i II ii a el i si n. •- --, - — --s, „,— ...- ..„ . ....,- . - --* -. • ' _"-•.----.. ___ . .. ,7 s ,--.,' *."--ii--';': ' ' . ,.. ' • '.- _ ' - - . .. .. ' . , "610,'• ' -' .* -. •- • . • . .• 114arini E -CEVED 1058 Tacoma Ave. NE. Renton, WA 98056 FEB 2 1989 CITY OF Ni mgAnills? g.414-1.toovn 7-4671tA) RfiC� .. 7 F/. 1ICE raze ilaV ply RAT ' - -----... ., (0 I RON1 SIP! ' I Oct LT" . 07:01111/0. i.A roil— ► s I d 4 Ran. • / _',ACK !Mt - 1+ 4 rENG1144- ' O (tor+ botiorl) I . F • mot-ii . E -EVA:110N, I r j C Tv) 1 Ir4,mull 2x 4 RAIL r A2A) 7- tq-��1*5 TO . �N ge, c" , ,cJ 0 �R14v6 IK4 ►tHCWq 7'7) ,6 AD T�,0 >N j f ► ' L*4 RAIL+NOLO Ut • V /ROM e011oN -L-- ON A A • rENGs DETAIL . - vt• • rev' 10114tekt u IRE CM'OF RENTON CE ! V EI JUN 2 0 1991 qr( hi �T' io 1 9 I / �� BUILDING DIVISION �_. CITY OF REN T ON v-K g 1// G ���-� i BUILDING DIVISION APPROVED — S� �� i For Construction Subject To ��C/// ! Corre tin Note ' ed BY Date PA K� � .b if)or) v M H a-Gor, P-04 c.,�,— CITY OF RENTON • MEMORANDUM DATE: February 15, 1991 TO: Jim Hanson FROM: 1j()il Wilson SUBJECT: UNION PLACE STREET LIGHTING ISSUE: Due to the street light problems listed in the background information, we are unable to sign the final plat of the above referenced project. BACKGROUND: The following problems/conditions exist: 1. The contactor cabinet was placed on private property without an easement. 2. The contactor cabinet was not placed on Union, as positioned on the plans, but rather on NE 7th Court. 3. The contactor cabinet is presently within a driveway; the City Standards call for a ten-foot clearance from driveways. 4. The following documentation has not been received: • Final inspection report certifying that lights are constructed to City Standards; • As-built drawings; • Easement for placement of lighting facilities on private land; and • Documentation requesting or authorizing deviations from original plans RECOMMENDED ACTION: In order for this plat to be approved for final platting, one of the following recommendations must be complied with: 1. The contactor cabinet must be located as shown on the original plans; and/or 2. The contactor cabinet may be relocated in the planner's strip, as indicated in the attached drawing. Attachment cc: Mike Dotson Karl Hamilton MEW:KHmr II • TRAN PoRTATION • DID . • I • • . f : :STREET LI4HTING CoNTAcTOR CAESINET INVESTIGATION • • . . ._. ...... . .. .. .-t4 -7-T CT kl E-6T OF ION-Aft-tl E • . . ; : - 1-.-_._:- 1---:1 _: : -:-: . " UNION f PL:AGE', 1_: . _....._..- _ _._ : . .. I_ :_ _ . - • -- ---- - - .._.... - ._.._.. -----.__. . • PSPL=.TRANSFrogmER . . :.::_..-•-• -•--•,•-- •-•------------•-- ---- ._...0------_ . ._. . . .._. STREET LI6HTtW4'.GA61NET : ' . ._. .._ _. . . I______ .._._._ f-"• . -- . - CEXIST ) - 1. • - -- - m•. O_...�._ ._.. . tJ .--_--- RM.LINE = 0 L,, O . . . j . _T . TDO 6MAI.I:- PLANTER AREA PLANTER AREA C -r(� P ER A 1. 10-0 .-.-....... . .._ ... •31f. r . . II •----. .-----__ _. ......___—__.. .err _._..-_.._.. . .-•-�---•----- -._...-•--- ' iL . -.-T---7. --.•7.: i ) " - ' • - : 1 • - • 1 . . . . . . ' - '. - • • • • ' . • • • . i 0.....• . .1 • I ' ; • '_-ALTEItNikTIVES-FdR"-STREET- -- __. .._; __._.__....._ _ - • . .-• LI4HTINCi::GORREcTIoN" 7 ' -. - . :.. . , • - eEZATE' p: Sf4E'I'-TO NE—:7TF1 'G -- -_T- - •-•--,--hr Pn ANTER AREA . -, ; • --H-- • - , , --- t , L AT CA►BIR 1710=i:INT.ahl__.AV_`�,1E--' E i , • , --T i-;-APJA-CENT o--PaWER POLE•_t P.ER, , t - - , , ' ' , , . < <r = ;- • :: : : : _._:_:_: .: -: : :-_.;_:_: : _• : :_ Int :HR::.::': : :-:.:-=•-- •. .. .-=-. • _ -I :-i-,- . _. •• : -. i_ ._. •; ; , .-.••- . •-' .-i,-�..t. •--•-. 7T - •1-- -i 1-:-; -;- t-: -;-r 7-i-", • -, -......_.. �_t .f_._.,_, . _... -:-- : - -•- T-•-r-.._ - r� A2ri1 17, 1989 Renton City Council Minutes f. Page 110 CAG: 89-031, Project Ways and Means Committee Chairman Trimm presented a report concurring Management Services in the recommendation of the Administration to authorize the Mayor and with Heery Program City Clerk to sign the agreement with Heery Program Management, Inc. to Management provide services for Phase I project management services. MOVED BY TRIMM, SECONDED BY STREDICKE, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. NEW BUSINESS Council President Stredicke commended Parks Department staff for a job Parks: Community Center well done in organizing and hosting the Community Center grand opening Grand Opening celebration on April 15. ADMINISTRATIVE Council request for removal of illegally posted Brighton Ridge Apartment REPORT signs, referred 4/3/89: Letter from Community Development Director Building: Brighton Ridge reported that as of April 10, signs have been removed with the exception of Apartment Sign Violation two A-frame signs allowed under Sign Code Section 4-1915. WSDOT: Portable Council request for relocation of Washington State DOT sanikan on Cedar Restrooms on Renton Hill Avenue S., referred 4/3/89: The contractor has been contacted by the Public Works Department and the sanikan will be relocated to a more appropriate area. Appeal: Oakwood Homes, Council referral of letter from John Malgarini regarding appeal rights on Inc. Rezone and OakWood Homes rezone and preliminary plat, referred 3/20/89: Letter from Preliminary Plat, R-091- Planning Division was sent on 4/4/89 reiterating prior information sent by 88, PP-091-88 City Clerk to Mr. Malgarini outlining Code requirement for filing timely appeal with fee prior to any Council review. ADJOURNMENT MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND KEOLKER, COUNCIL ADJOURN THE MEETING. CARRIED. Time: 10:40 p.m. MAXINE E. MOTOR, CMC, City Clerk Recorder: M. Petersen 04/17/89 CITY OF RENTON Memorandum Date: April 6, 1989 To: City Council From: Mayor Clymet- Subject: Council Response: Malgarini The attached letter from Don Erickson to John Malgarini is a result of council direction given at the March 21 meeting. c: /Ci y Clerk 89061 CR.ec/jah • CITY OF RENTON APR 7 1989 • RECEIVED CITY CLERK'S OFFICE • 4130 CITY OF RENTON DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor PLANNING. DIVISION • • CITY OF RENTON • • APR 5 1989 April 4 , 1989 MAYOR'S OFFICE • John S . Malgarini 1058 Tacoma Avenue N. E. Renton, WA 98056 ' RE: Appeal Process for Rezone and Preliminary Plat 091-88 Dear Mr. Malgarini: I have been asked by the City Clerk to respond to your letter of March 18 , 1989 to the City Council asking about the subject matter that can be considered in order to have a' valid appeal. This letter also implies that you are seeking a time extension for filing an appeal because' you do not believe that Council responded to your inquiry in a timely manner. Regarding the first item, Section 4-3016 (A) , is very clear. It reads as follows: "The written notice of appeal shall fully, clearly and thoroughly specify the substantial error(s) in fact or law which exist in the record of the proceedings from which the appellant seeks relief. " • Thus, the subject matter that can be considered must relate to showing that a substantial error in fact or law. exists in the Hearing Examiner's record. • inn ►.I:u A...._.._ ['_...I. _ n "(Intl r John S . Malgarini April 4 , 1989 Page 2 • Regarding the issue of timeliness, Section. 4-3016 APPEAL, is very clear as well : "Unless an ordinance providing for review of decision-- of the Examiner requires review thereof by the Superior Court, any interested party aggrieved by the Examiner' s written decision or recommendation may submit a notice of appeal to the City Clerk upon a form furnished by the City Clerk, within fourteen (14) calendar days from the date of the Examiner's written report. The notice of appeal shall be accompanied by a fee in accordance with the Fee .Schedule of the City. " Council obviously did not feel that it was appropriate to extend the ordinance mandated fourteen (14 ) day appeal period. It did take efforts to ensure that you or your representative knew that the deadline for filing an appeal was March 15th at 5 : 00 P.M. Since you acknowledge receipt of the City Clerk' s letter in this regard and apparently chose not to submit an appeal (your letter of March 18 , 1989 also indicates some hesitancy in this regard, "if and when I file it, " ) there is nothing more we can legally do. Unless the applicant , Oakwood Homes, Inc. , withdraws its Preliminary Plat application (PP-091-88) , there is nothing I can do to change the situation. If 'I can answer any questions you may have or send you copies of the relevant ordinances pertaining to Appeals, please let me know. erely, A/alie Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator DE:mjp cc: Mayor Earl Clymer City Clerk Maxine Motor Y C� 41, i %0 M• CITY OF RENTON FINANCE DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor Maxine E. Motor, City Clerk April 17, 1989 Steve Lusa Oakwood Homes, Inc. 18712 142nd NE Woodinville, WA 98072 • Dear Mr. Lusa: The Renton City Council at its abbreviated meeting of April 10, 1989, adopted Ordinance No. 4210 changing the zoning classification of certain properties within the City of Renton from G-1 to R-1. A copy of the ordinance is attached for your records. If we can be of further assistance in this matter, please feel free to call . Yours truly, • CITY OF RENTON Maxine E. Motor, CMC City Clerk cc: John Godsey John Malgarini Philip R. Barber Enclosure 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2501 • • Department of Assessments ATTENTION: Abstract Section - Al Martin 709F King County Administration • OF k? Seattle, WA 98104 'y OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK p PUBLIC RECORDS DIVISION 9�� ® z n N The attached material comes to you in 012,2o response to your recent request. 094TEO SEPSc���� Ordinance No. 4210 April 17, 1989 CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVENUE SOUTH RENTON, .WA 98055 PHONE (206) 235-2500 Maxine E. Motor, City Clerk • . .....,•;:. ........ .....:+_..s.. ".'*..."'ma's - _ :l' - _l_._ - - :gyp'• ,.S•a ter, • • • • • • • • • • • .Public Notice and the city council having duly considered all matters relevant thereto, and all parties having been heard appearing in support thereof or in opposition thereto; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY-COUN- CIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASH- INGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The following described property in the City of Renton is hereby rezoned to R-1 (Single-Family Residential), as hereinbelow specified, subject to the findings, conclusions, and decision of the hearing examiner dated February 7, 1989, and the Planning Manager is hereby autho- rized and directed to change the r:i•_p of the Zoning Ordinance, as amended,to evi- 1 • dence said rezoning, to-wit: --� - See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made part hereof as if fully set forth herein. - CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON (Approximately 2.06 acres of property ORDINANCE NO. 4210 being located at 763 Union Avenue N.E.) • AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SECTION II. This Ordinance shall be RENTON, WASHINGTON CHANGING effective upon its passage, approval, and THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF five days after its publication. CERTAIN PROPERTIES WITHIN THE PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this CITY OF RENTON FROM G-1 (GENERAL 10th day of April, 1989. USE)TO R-1 (SINGLE-FAMILY - Maxine E. Motor, City Clerk RESIDENTIAL)(OAKWOOD HOMES,INC:; APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this 1'Oth•day R-091-88). - of April, 1989. WHEREAS, under Chapter 7, Title IV Earl Clymer, Mayor (Building Regulations) of Ordinance No. Approved as to form: 1628 known as the"Code of General Ordi- Lawrence J.Warren, City Attorney nances of the-City of Renton," as amend- L.T.A. COMMITMENT ed, and the maps and reports adopted in - conjunction therewith, the property herein- EXHIBIT "A" - below described has heretofore been The north 1/3 of the following described I, zoned as G-1 ,(General Use); and property; WHEREAS,a proper petition for change The Northeast quarter of the Southeast of zone classification of said property has quarter of Section 9, Township 23 North, been filed with the Planning Division on or Range 5 East,Willamette Meridian,In King about September 16, 1988, which petition County, Washington, except the South 15 was duly referred to the.hearing examiner acres thereof; and except County Road; for investigation,study,and public hearing, Excepting from said North 1/3 that portion and a public hearing having been held platted as Albert Balch's President Park thereon on or about January 24, 1989,and No.4, according to the plat thereof record- said matter having been held duly consid- ed in Volume 51 of Plats,pages 14 and 15, ered by the hearing examiner, and said in King County, Washington zoning request being in conformity with the Published in the Valley Daily News April city's comprehensive plan, as amended,- 14, 1989. R3459. Acct. #50640. 50640 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION Audrey B A n rip r ,being first duly sworn on oath states that he/she is the Chief Clerk of the VALLEY DAILY NE - • Kent Edition • Renton Edition • Auburn Edition Daily newspapers published six(6)times a week.That said newspapers are legal newspapers and• are now and have been for more than six months prior to the date of publication referred to,printed and published in the English language continually as daily newspapers in Kent, King • County,Washington.The Valley Daily News has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for King County. - • The notice in the exact form attached,was published in the Kent Edition , Renton Edition , Auburn Edition , (and not in supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers during the below stated period.The annexed notice a Ordinance No . 4210 was published on April 14, 1989 The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the • sum of $ 5 7 6 0 Subscribed and sworn to before a this 2 7-t' day of Ap i i 1 19 Not y Public for the State of Washington, residing at Federal Way, L - King County, Washington. VDN#87 fievised 11/86 V H ' CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. 4210 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF CERTAIN PROPERTIES WITHIN THE CITY OF RENTON FROM G-1 (GENERAL USE) TO R-1 (SINGLE- FAMILY RESIDENTIAL) (OAKWOOD HOMES, INC. ; R-091-88) . WHEREAS, under Chapter 7, Title IV (Building Regulations) of Ordinance No. 1628 known as the "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, " as amended, and the maps and reports adopted in conjunction therewith, the property hereinbelow described has heretofore been zoned as G-1 (General Use) ; and WHEREAS, a proper petition for change of zone classification of said property has been filed with the Planning Division on or about September 16, 1988, which petition was duly referred to the hearing examiner for investigation, study, and public hearing., and a public hearing having been held thereon on or about January 24, 1989, and said matter having been duly considered by the hearing examiner, and said zoning request being in conformity with the city's comprehensive plan, as amended, and the city council having duly considered all matters relevant thereto, and all parties having been heard appearing in support thereof or in opposition thereto; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I. The following described property in the City of Renton is hereby rezoned to R-1 (Single-Family Residential) , as hereinbelow specified, subject to the findings, conclusions, and decision of the hearing examiner dated February 7, 1989, and the 1 . ORDINANCE NO. 4210 Planning Manager is hereby authorized and directed to change the maps of the Zoning Ordinance, as amended, to evidence said rezoning, to-wit: See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof as if fully set forth herein. (Approximately 2 . 06 acres of property being located at 763 Union Avenue N.E. ) SECTION II. This Ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval, and five days after its publication. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this 10th day of April , 1989 . Maxine E . Motor, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this 10th day of Aril , 1989 . Earl Clymer, Mayor Appro as to form: Lawrence J. Wa en, City Attorney Date of Publication: April 14, 1989 ORD.84:3/22/89 :as. 2 . L. T. A. COMMITMENT - 1DRDINANCE NO. 4210 Exhibit A . (Continued ) - Our No. 134105 Your No. • THE NORTH 1/3 OF THE FOLLOWING. DESCRIBED PROPERTY; THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING 'COUNTY, WASHINGTON; EXCEPT THE SOUTH 15 ACRES THEREOF; AND EXCEPT COUNTY ROAD; EXCEPTING FROM SAID NORTH 1/3 THAT PORTION PLATTED AS ALBERT BALCH 'S - PRESIDENT PARK NO. 4, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 51 OF PLATS, PAGES 14 .AND 15, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. . ' • PAGE ' 2 w- 11)1( ^hicago Title Insurance Comp-I) • IMPORTANT:This is nol a Plat of Survey.It is furnished as a convenience to locate the land indicated hereon with reference to streets and other land.No liability is assumed by reason of reliance hereon. ORDINANCE NO. 4210 ORDER NO. \.31-tt n5 - 1800 Columbia Center 701 Fihh Avenue Seattle.Washington 9a104 rio-iiiiiiii NE Cx)R. of c`r`1' . S •.g —TwT.23N-1 .5 —,w . M . E.17..1. .u4.°c.1. AI z, -,tAilev,..-- 1/43sfl: t,5 M Xf . IN , N 41 e' oi Wl I., 'xN.6.7n+ ST 4 �, q,Joy tkl Ni s. m ,L_____..,_,_ 1 .. . e p, AI . s+l,., .t .o� !f.4A!tylk�HdS.15M. wpo N.E. 6T74 PL. '— • r. • ORDINANCE' NO. ' 4210 n , • ••• • II II ALB T BALCHS PESIDENT'P[Ric NO. 4„ • • . ::,.: . . A . , ., ,,,,.,,. . • 1itI1 . . .:,.. CO. . ..,.._....•=1 " i. 0 -., . • . s. . -1\ • 1 .„ . : .,..:.•L . • . .. •:. • ...4 : ' • ,coo g e: • r •ST• MENT '��� :� . . PPP. .7.7--...._—....V..1.t,...:44)1 . ',:i'l;.::* -. . • .'?..:•.i .' ° s it • 0 p. ...,,,:„. . . __ „ , ,....„..:„ . ... . • , , •� fE.. WI' 11111 . . . • a . • . .,. . . > . • O g I rl I�� o . . . ;$3 x • ,. lii" `.:. . . 1 e g j. L I° . '----u-1-____:,._.—1 i ii !ii _ �iSls• WAT4k Is' ` _•: _tiRA1N Dry~/®'� iii —- - _- ... ' N.�. 1,32n:d.• AVENUE ,, i • 1. ' `a`„- �+ 1. "t � -r Ill q �'n DID !L = ti'm •/.`' •'p'�hii r C CC •I 77Y . ,� i , « . ' :• '. N v,, ,yam• - . 11. h • L'I.i * ' li " • ' .• . IPAW NO U-PU I DM! s/I/M 'views ' ( ` :( • OONfJLTN6 p101RlRINO somas N PRELIMINARY PLAT'; �""e..or Maw """'•'"/ •• UNION PLACE 1 ei Le aro A �A0111tI R InIF/n1 _ j a;1; F/2 April 10. 1989 Renton City Council Minutes Page 99 Streets: North Renton Public Works Department submitted recommendation on traffic circles and Traffic Circles and diverters for the North Renton area. Refer to Transportation Committee. Diverters Parks: Senior Citizen Community Services Committee recommended approval of extended travel Travel Program Extension program for senior citizens as requested by the Renton Senior Center staff. Council concur. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY REED, COUNCIL APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA EXCLUDING ITEM f. CARRIED. Appointment: Mayor Clymer requested Council confirmation of Ken Nyberg as Community Community Develop- Development Director. Refer to Ways and Means Committee. 'MOVED BY ment Director MATHEWS, SECOND BY REED, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE APPOINTMENT. Upon Council inquiry concerning opposing staff input during a recent committee meeting, Mr. Nyberg explained his objective of improved staff coordination between the Public Works Department and the Community Development Department. MOTION CARRIED. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS Ways and Means Ways and Means Committee Chairman Trimm presented a report Committee recommending the following ordinance for second and final reading: Ordinance #4210 An ordinance was read changing the zoning classification of certain Rezone: Oakwood Homes, properties located at 763 Union Avenue NE from G-1 (general) to R-1 Inc. and Preliminary Plat, (single family residential) for Oakwood Homes, Inc.,. R-091-88. MOVED BY R-091-88, PP-091-88 TRIMM, SECONDED BY STREDICKE, COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. Ways and Means Committee Chairman Trimm presented the following ordinance for first reading: Utility: 1989 Water and An ordinance was read relating to the waterworks utility of the City, Sewer Revenue Bonds including the sewerage system as a part thereof; specifying and adopting a system or plan of additions to and betterments and extensions of the waterworks utility; providing for the issuance of $1,715,000 par value Water and Sewer Revenue Bonds, 1989, of the City for the purpose of obtaining a part of the funds with which to pay the cost of carrying out that system or plan; fixing the date, form, denominations, maturities, interest rates, terms and covenants of those bonds; creating a special bond redemption account to provide for the payment of the bonds; ratifying and confirming the public sale of those bonds; and accepting the bid of and providing for the delivery of those bonds. MOVED BY TRIMM, SECOND STREDICKE, REFER THE ORDINANCE BACK TO COMMITTEE FOR ONE WEEK. CARRIED. The Ways and Means Committee recommended approval of Vouchers No. 59644 through No. 60012 in the amount of $1,673,110.48; having received departmental certification that merchandise/services have been received or rendered; Vouchers No. 59667 through No. 59670 machine voided. NEW BUSINESS / Utilities Committee Member Nelson presented a report indicating that the Utilities Committee Water Pollution Abatement Advisory Committee has requested support for Metro: Proposed legislation to allow Metro to have a connection charge. The Utilities Connection Charge Committee recommended that this legislation and efforts of Metro to acquire a special connection charge not be supported at this time. MOVED BY NELSON, SECOND STREDICKE, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Executive Session MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY MATHEWS, COUNCIL MOVE TO EXECUTIVE SESSION TO DISCUSS PERSONNEL MATTER. CARRIED. Time: 7:40 p.m. ADJOURNMENT Council reconvened into regular session. Roll was called, all Council members were present except Keolker-Wheeler and Hughes, previously excused. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND MATHEWS, COUNCIL MEETING ADJOURN. CARRIED. Time: 8:00 p.m. MAXINE E. MOTOR, CMC, City Clerk Recorder: M. Motor 04/10/89 WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE COMMITTEE REPORT APRIL 10, 1989 ORDINANCES The Ways and Means Committee recommends the following ordinance for second and final reading: Oakwood Homes, Inc. Rezone and Preliminary Plat, R-09.1-88 , PP-091-88, 2 . 06 acres located at 763 Union Avenue NE from G- 1 to R-1 for development of 10-lot plat The Ways and Means Committee recommends the following ordinance for first reading: Water and Sewer Revenue Bonds APPROVAL OF VOUCHERS The Ways and Means Committee recommends approval of Vouchers No. 59644 through No. 60012 in the amount of $1, 673 , 110.48 ; having received departmental certification that merchandise/services have been received or rendered; Vouchers No. 59667 through No. 59670 machine voided.2.7t- 6,4)( 171 Thomas Trimm, Chairman Richard Stredicke, Acting Member 1 lir LI , U CURRENT PLANNING ( `''') f ' Copies to: DATE: �/S 6P9 Airport - Building • City Attorney City Council '� Engineering Finance Fire Dept./Prevention__ - Hearing Examiner � I Housing & Human Resources q Long Range Planning Mayor CITY OF RENTON � I 1 Parks APR 51989 Personnel _Planning Commission RECEIVED _Police CITY CLERK'S OFFICE Public Works Traffic Engineering Storm Water Drainage (o CITY OF RENTON DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF RENTON April 4 , 1989 APR 5 1989 RECEIVED CITY CLERK'S OFFICE John S. Malgarini 1058 Tacoma Avenue N.E. Renton, WA 98056 RE: Appeal Process for Rezone and Preliminary Plat 091-88 Dear Mr. Malgarini: I have been asked by the City Clerk to respond to your • letter of March 18 , 1989 to the City Council asking about the subject matter that can be considered in order to have a valid appeal. This letter also implies that you are seeking a time extension for filing an appeal because you do not believe that Council responded to your inquiry in a timely manner. Regarding the first item, Section 4-3016 (A) , is very clear. It reads as follows: "The written notice of appeal shall fully, clearly and thoroughly specify the substantial error(s) in fact or law which exist in the record of the proceedings from which the appellant seeks relief. " Thus, the subject matter that can be considered must relate to showing that a substantial error in fact or law exists in the Hearing Examiner's record. 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2550 r John S. Malgarini April 4 , 1989 _ Page 2 Regarding the issue of timeliness, Section 4-3016 APPEAL, is very clear as well : "Unless an ordinance providing for review of decision of the Examiner requires review thereof by the Superior Court, any interested party aggrieved by the Examiner's written decision or recommendation may submit a notice of appeal to the City Clerk upon a form furnished by the City Clerk, within fourteen (14) calendar days from the date of the Examiner's written report. The notice of appeal shall be accompanied by a fee in accordance with the Fee Schedule of the City. " Council obviously did not feel that it was appropriate to extend the ordinance mandated fourteen (14) day appeal period. It did take efforts to ensure that you or your representative knew that the deadline for filing an appeal was March 15th at 5: 00 P.M. Since you acknowledge receipt of the City Clerk's letter in this regard and apparently chose not to submit an appeal (your letter of March 18, 1989 also indicates some hesitancy in this regard, "if and when I file it, ") there is nothing more we can legally do. Unless the applicant, Oakwood Homes, Inc. , withdraws its Preliminary Plat application (PP-091-88) , there is nothing I can do to change the situation. If I can answer any questions you may have or send you copies of the relevant ordinances pertaining to Appeals, please let me know. erely, ti Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator DE:mjp cc: Mayor Earl Clymer City Clerk Maxine Motor rs sr April 3, 1989 Renton City Council Minutes Pane 93 Rezone: Oakwood Homes, An ordinance was read changing the zoning classification of certain Inc. and Preliminary Plat, properties located at 763 Union Avenue NE from G-1 (general) to R-1 R-091-88, PP-091-88 (single family residential) for Oakwood Homes, Inc., R-091-88. MOVED BY TRIMM, SECONDED BY STREDICKE, COUNCIL REFER THIS ORDINANCE BACK TO COMMITTEE FOR ONE WEEK. CARRIED. Ways and Means Committee Chairman Trimm presented the following resolution for adoption: Resolution #2756 An resolution was read declaring an emergency as a result of dangerous slide Public Works: Clarke on Lake Washington Boulevard at NE 51st Street, and authorizing expenditure Landslide, Lake of up to $30,000 to remove material that is a threat and take steps to remedy Washington Boulevard the slide problem. MOVED BY TRIMM, SECONDED BY KEOLKER- and NE 51st Street, WHEELER, COUNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED. Emergency Action Personnel: Airport Ways and Means Committee Chairman Trimm presented a report Manager Upgrade recommending Council concurrence in the request of the Personnel Department to upgrade the Airport Manager position to a grade 14. No additional funds are required. MOVED BY TRIMM, SECONDED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER(COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. NEW BUSINESS Council President Stredicke reported that illegal signs have been reposted Building: Sign Code advertising the Brighton Ridge apartments. Signs were removed by the Violation by Brighton Building Department on March 8th at Council request. (See administrative Ridge Apartments report.) He also asked the Administration to investigate reports of illegal real estate signs and illegal dumping on Benson Road. WSDOT: Ramp Meters The Administration was asked by Council President Stredicke to report to the WSDOT the Council's continued opposition to freeway ramp metering since it will increase traffic congestion on City streets. Councilwoman Mathews advised that DOT representatives at Valley Transportation meetings have been told that the City of Renton is opposed to ramp metering unless the State can demonstrate that sufficient capacity exists to handle the backup on arterial streets. She noted that since there is insufficient capacity to handle existing traffic volume, DOT has not been able to demonstrate any benefit from ramp metering in Renton. Citizen Comment: Council Councilwoman Keolker-Wheeler suggested that a time clock be provided in Meeting Time Clock the Chambers to assist speakers in concluding their remarks within the allotted five-minute time limit. WSDOT: Portable Councilwoman Keolker-Wheeler relayed a complaint from Renton Hill Restrooms on Renton Hill residents that WSDOT has located portable restrooms for I-405 workers in front of homes on Cedar Avenue. She asked that the facilities be moved by WSDOT away from residences. ADMINISTRATIVE Referral of 2/6/89 - Council request for information regarding emergency REPORT shelters for the homeless in Renton. Letter was sent to Council on 3/2/89 H & HR: Emergency from Housing & Human Resources Coordinator John Morris reporting that Housing the YWCA operates four units in the Renton Highlands; the City is a co- applicant with the Renton Housing Authority for $250,000 in State Housing Trust funds to rehabilitate the E Street Apartments at 955 Edmonds in the Renton Highlands to provide 30 units; the City is participating in the King County Human Services Roundtable to provide housing for the homeless; and the City will be working with the Renton Ecumenical Association of Churches to meet critical housing needs in the community. Council President Stredicke asked if funds to renovate the E Street Apartments are over and above the funds included in the senior housing bond issue. Councilwoman Nelson confirmed that the two projects are separate. Building: Brighton Ridge Referral of 3/6/89 - Council complaint regarding illegal posting of signs Apartment Sign Violation advertising Brighton Ridge Apartments. Building Division personnel removed the illegal signs on 3/8/89. Mayor Clymer indicated that the Building r Division will be directed to respond to the second violation cited this date by Council President Stredicke. PUD: Final, Victoria Hills Referral of 3/6/89 = Council request for detailed schedule of completion Phase II, FPUD-042-85 dates for Victoria Hills FPUD activities to be submitted to Planning and Development Committee. A schedule of project activities was previously provided to the Committee; additional information gathered by First City Developments Company was submitted by 3/22/89. WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE COMMITTEE REPORT APRIL 3, 1989 ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS The Ways and Means Committee recommends the following ordinance for second and final reading: Williams/Dolleman Rezone, R-004-88, request for 7.45 acres of property located at 3717 NE 6th Street from G-1 to R-1 and R-2 for future housing development The Ways and Means Committee recommends the following ordinance for first reading: Oakwood Homes, Inc. Rezone and Preliminary Plat, R-091-88, PP-091-88, 2 . 06 acres located at 763 Union Avenue NE from G- 1 to R-1 for development of 10-lot plat The Ways and Means Committee recommends the following resolution for reading and adoption: Resolution Declaring an Emergency re the Land Slide at Lake Washington Blvd. and NE 51st Street AIRPORT MANAGER RECLASSIFICATION (Referred 4/3/89) The Ways and Means Committee recommends Council concurrence in the request of the Personnel Department to upgrade the Airport Manager position to a grade 14. No additional funds are required. (041-44/ Thomas Trimm, Chairman / /a/l/tA 1 KOA-ele-0/1 athy eolker-Wheeler, Vice-Chair R char Stredicke, Acting Member APR 83 '89 15:17 INT'L ASSET MANAGEMENT P.1 NN' 39Idd0 SJI1:1310 ALIO Q3AI 3Rk! 646Ir adti NOLNUI A0 A/I0 • pi 11 w �s/// /moo 7 p? o),./i :7,7141 * /jam oATE ,luly 14. 1988 _ REAL ESTATE LANs PuRCH4S2 & SALE AGREgtENT • 'MIS IS A LEIIAi-�Y Etlfii]ltiG CONTRACT , • ' the following afaroeeont Is hereby entered Into by and pale atin 0 kwood Ramos. Inc. and/ar essios theretnofter Warm to es pureheserl and _, thereinafter referred ' to pi Sollars). Purchaaer agraea to bu and Ssllar 441'ee6 a s 16 an the following terms. that property commonly known as; 763 132nd S. E Rent n, Wa. , lapel 4escrlptlan at which is attdehad ndrato ' as Exhibit "A" and may be further dgcribed'on any other attnchmoncd hereto ps Exhibit ne • Five Hundred & No/l00 • t. mu totnt purchase prices 16t {P102,500.00) One Hundred Two Thousand ' payable de, fc.11c►wa.t All. cash at closing lass Earnest Money paid to date of closing. . ' upon Sollars ex®cation of a et;.taa- tory warranty dead, ' 2. Yitto to the property is to 04 tree of all liens. encumbrances. or defects axcept those waived In wrialnp ' • by purchaser;' • 3. Seller wurr.anta that the property is sorvlced by all necessary public utilities including 4eawdr. boar, • pnaur,, cps and storo drainage Sufficient for Perchaser's intended uSu. It ' 4. Teo closing acmes shell ba as Buyer shall designate. • . !. Sellars agree to sign ail documents necessary for Purchaser t4 obtain ell waggery approvals for Purchesor's intended usa71. . . '0. This pals shall be closed upon Purchasers receipt of all final approvals and issuance of oil permits tar ' ' ,'tea completion at a 10 lot plat , • Purchasers and Sellers will. immediately upon floand, deposit all instruments and wonies nacerrbry to complw- to the purchase in accordance with this aererant. . • . ' • • y, Sellers he reby•autfioriza Purchaser to enter upon said property for the purpose of conducting any noboa dory , • ' tests. surveys, or inspections, • r` • d. Purchaser shall be untitled to possession on ;losing, "Closing' means the date on which all documents are • • • recorded. , • O. , Sailer warrants that the current toning dasignatton is Single Family '• . • 10. Sailor auras to deliver. end/or cause to be delivered, inmwdtately on purchasers request, any necessary • efisemwnts•or private party approvals.. • 11. If this agreement pravidos for Purchaser's assumption of any existing notes. mortgages, Deeds of Trust, • ar. Reel Estate contracts, this agreement shall 44 SubJact:to purchase r'i Inspection and written af+provoi . prior to closing of the toras and conditions contained thoreln. In the event this agroa+irnc prowioos toe • S:fl1ers continuing payment of. or Cash out of.'any existing note. earwig*. llaao•of Trust. or Mimi Estate COntract. Se11or shall be liable for any costa or ponaities assoc,latad therewith. , 10.. ,Seiler authorizes Buyer, at Sutlers expense, ta, lwnedlately apply fora Coaoitment for a' standard for Owners • '., • Kiley of Title lnsurenee to be issued such Title Coapany as Sfayet shall designate. Said Preliminary pamaalt- • * , rentg rand the Tub policy to as issued. shall. contfaln no excopclon other than Chase pravtaau tar In ;said ' • +standard taro and those provided far to paragraph 2 hereof. it Title cannot sae wade so ineuraulw prior • '. to the closing date provided for herein, tie earnest &only Shall. unless purchaser elects to wwivu, Ouch • ' , ' oncunuroEtcaw or uafects, at rutundnd to Pwrahaaer end fuller ayruse to'reimburse Purchaser tar many euf 4nucls incurred In connuctlon with subject property, and th44 egraoaaunt shall thereupon tea terminated. 13. This agreement is subject to Pi,erchasors satisfactory coapl.tien ter' a (salability s%may within 0 T dayir • attar mutual acceptance of this agreement and failure at Purchaser to notify Saller' in writing or sails'iac' tory completion of said feasibility Study within said , ,,,• days period shall render,.th.ls egreaxwnt null and rota. , - �.. • „ :I', , . • . . :•4. . ',.,.',.'',:..::'.,1,:. ,.'.!: :,,,,',. ' ' • — tel:• �•� • ..i. /' �.::;1 , — , 7 •-I - • . ''i� I IflIll'ac,HF,11-III I7QCH 7- 16IT'''J'T.e'T CO Cfa'JJ1-I . .0 . -7--„, , , . . . .. ..). . . . . . . . - . ,..,. . . . • . . . , , . . . . . . . • . . , • . . . . , . . . , . . . . . . . . • . . , . . .. . . . . 4 . • , ,A, ice . , ram per ' below 14, Purchaser bee deposited S ' 2,004.00 earnest Money to the tare of a preelssory note aui/ CS'•I lirlft . arEgGVINginlOIXdariPainialOtifIXX X In the event Pu'rchasar fails to closet We transaction, except as provided heroin. Sollar shall be entltted to sato earnest money Ab total liquigated douuages, In the event either Buyer or : • Seiler shelf institute suit or legal aaslataance co enforce'tany rights heroin, the succesaful 'party shell by antitiled to court coat* @nolo( reesoAabie nttornaya tees. In the event of telal, the amount of attorneys lees snail be .fixed by the ceurc, , , • , 15. Time is of the es$ence of this .Agreement.' , tit. Purchaser and Boller authorise pti Lenders, Escrow Agents, Apprelsers. Titlu,lnseranoe Coulpanles And other • parties related to this transaction ta. furnish to the .other party. upon request. any and ell intormetlon 'end/or copies of uocuwsnts 'pertinent to this treneectian.• • . 17. Salter warrants that ha, she. or they have dialoged All pertinent tecLs regarding subject property to Pwr• • ctAsar. • ' • , . • • • la. Seller hereby warrents 'that. to the best of their knowledge, no toxic or hazardous materials havu teen stored ' or disposed of on sueject property. ' , • . , • '19. Paragraphs 2,3,0 17 and 16 %hail survive closing. �.f (I20 optional) us .�._ per Item #21 • OV'l1�/Z6 �lfS'! • ri f re€444 f. �,r. e 20. Seller agrees to pay a commission of % Of the total purchase price provided for herein is cash at tiMw • of. closing to be dispuraod to the agent% olrsctly by the Escrow'agent; ' 1xitAXiV X nxxxxx' ' Kmucoutrata xvritaxx wx xxxxxxx)5x-MxxxxxxRX}CI X ax Cx1c • 21. el +art net $92 500.00 aster nor cei,;tg aoMtq, an Bales ' Ism iea is paid. 22. The $2,000.00 Earnest Money is to be released to Sellers upon all aig/aturee• and be . increased by $500.00 per month until closing . ' • 23. Within two. weeks of all signatures all'neceasary documents for preliminary plat . • application will be filed at City of. Renton, ' 24. rurchaser will furnish Seller with monthly report of progress of platting. ' SELLERS pl1RCt�ASERS . .:3.---‘4. 1 1,1-4.,., Grc,f 1.- 5 C--- X' d. l'i i 0 r-'.. . 0 f 4-.• /—;:ir .''' DY . , DATED:' $ / — S • AATERf - 4 These parties hereby acknowledge R true and completed copy of this agreement executed by all parties hereto. . . ' ' . SELLERS INITIALS . .. ' ' , ' . PURCHASERS INITIALS" . 4 ./164—. ' . . • . ' . DATED: .gig..'_ 1 ,-^' cg 1 'DATED: 9' r� (optional coincides with 1 9) • • •' • . ' . •• IRC OP WASHINC1ON - , • P'•.-I ' + ' . '• ', •••• • ' ' . ' ' ' 11.1l1. ''1701HkIHI.I Il 1 H T. I1J P!T' T•CT g.P. rfi >..I.-IH ' • IIP”..c.1 .._- - .. ' I •^—' -_ �CapYriphtw t988 Rev. Form' Na.34 Puget Sound Muldpb LIetinp Aaaociatlotl 11ay.�rtiB ALL RIGHTS RESERVED , ADDENDUM/AMENDMENT'TO PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT The following is a peg of the Purchase and Sale Agreement dated ` L f� r 19 2rit.,', I "'"^ /we', cp ew ( ("Seller") and E betweenO6 17f a eft e mg rat 1- s'T l s 4' p. ma, U4Y ,(Buyer"). • IT IS AGREED BETWEEN THE SELLER AND BUYER AS FOLLOWS: t+_z_.(ki,LtdcaP �� ,u'' !Saree. , ers i ,10_ I 0 `` 4 % I fie * i 1 ./ r, r , , / / Z-- 2144d) , __di •', ., 7:: d;":_."Pi: '-‘1-_.ri!iirr . 11° a lev- AMNFI- C--"i' '" . ' If e, . 61/4 , • lfrAririllillr r _-:- re4- 1 " ,4I Al/ kw „6, e • kitittl:ly .- 4 - 0-4-7-4! . 1 _. ._. .....All I 1 7 i 'liirAllire-1 ' ,. tea. IQ- Y © rent t y /.r /61 t o6e4 - - a 1 t 'r:.t i... + ,. i , . , , , f . ivi4e,gettoesku); pee- i d f ulti4.A PS e 1 ec v. orl . AP 40 . 0 e i . ; , , -_-- ffratki. • e .4,,,,,,, . ,,,.. /z -- -. .,... . , ,il,,,,,,,,,..a ;, . _.,,,,,, . 1l Z 4e . zi.- D'' ,. 4 i ITSIPPieree-et . ,c...r.-.0.4 00, t o ' :43Z . 1.. •i a i id . 0 • z ,,, .a . . „ ,4. , . itecipLev_. eL.__5 _Ay, i,‘ , j . , L.t.5 it e4A-• 17149.44Se eerZt IA' ' ee urilt ie ,.#4,* ,5 , . y y / '/(/� /+/,J� �r+y /jf j�(�//� /yam 'y:uyh'Mk1SRt1Y+ •sl:T'ro . r::41• e., • ' 1 aka I`• Iy�.6' f/ e' t IN Me' IF/ // �M+ r�Y1M �" r 1Ley, 's hope 7140P.4e 4 7CW ice:lee-I 44.71$ eiA;d4 17 eke t . rt 0.4044.4- r Ire,, a be 410 A0 . ree#$ . rc e AU.OTHER TERMS AND CONDITIONS of said greement remain unchanged. /� ec 4Ait:ovi "i Buyer �- 1,9- Seller .. - . r A. . • , . fr.S • Buyer �te 19�._ Seller ' _ .,_.;,,i- _ _ir G1at= '42— -4. 19.P .. A Agent(Office) , By WAIP - • -'.... 17'-.1. • . I A 171.17Aut lull I-7ccu -I !LIT rT.F`T rn rrs \I lu Hrr: Lk. _:'=J 15: 1 r lf••I I 'L HS!*I i•iW IHUE'1E'{T',I, ..,,.; P.2 ;t ySr .'1 • ' 'oiaA puff IP U luomegJOT s1g1 JepueJ tigyt poli.gd sRgp 0 plot ulyiik Aprils Alttiousoli ptas in uollnidro, Aim .a"►1`t1at Jo eu111JM u1 .Jaitvs Ali2eu 0% Jo9v4aJed 10 aantiai pug 2unlnpJ8v stul {o htfunldavya I m mo Jolla IAnp `U U1011A 0n11 A1111ts'yssi 0 •ie U011e1d000 AJ0)0,191102 UJn1Pu0 el 1vnrgnt 11 10mmeuAll 11111 11 ' '00100i0,1e3 sg uodnPJmll Imo autns4PJtlo isms pUo s(tIJhloJd Ionrgnl 47tn uolIvmrvoa ul nnJJ'DUi aenut'Jra Aum JOI JasauaJnd 11ljngnf,J.O1 sseJet 'pilot pUli JI$MIlOJrd as popunioJ op 't1D01U0 Jo smougaggeU9 ' • moms nA1tM 01 mein Jesemeold ssO/Uri ftlrgt Itsuog 119UJO0 ri 'U1,Jeu Jai PspppoJd slap 60so1e 00 01 JelJd elvajnsul es opts go )ouuee 01111 {1 'la.JsU l; UdsJeLJad u1 Jai pgpixoJd !says pug ■Jej pJQpua11w ' - plan u1 Jos PoolAOJd •$eII UPU1 Js41e velsdtem$ ou utgluoa 11aUs 'will el 01 Av11od aims •UI puff 'lusa . • t'I ltes AJauta►11lJd PT'S 'S$!Ubi3Op 11mis J!R►lg se Auodsed IOU i ii pin9S1 sq 0 eaua,Jnsul silil le Aellod • ' • sJSUN° JoJ pJepuals o Joi lUeosisntep !' Jul Rtddt Rtelsj00telea 'gsuedxs !Josses )v 'JEAN, 2s2IJo41nO Jelin' ' .% 'u11MSJVU2 psagt'vosiv selltvUsd JO !so** Aut Jd{ 010011 eq i100 Josses 'I J)U00 0I01'J :""11 Jo '1tfi1 10.040d 1060)JOp 'D$OU eulasixe slur fie Imo usov Jo 40 $ueSAad Ouinulluee cloffrg Jet sootAOJd 10,014,11111 sit$ IU•A• sill ul 'ulsio4t p•ul'aluep suolllpuoe puv swJsj sun io Iiutsolo os Jo1Jd ion0Jdlo uslItJM pug uemsdsui sfJsssq'Jnd oi!;p9(arls 0+1 11ogb lu00e0J61 iltu '410vJ)uo7 esosol 1aali Jo ' '19nJj {o gp100 0see061Joe1 'tslMU (0t141xs Ruv jo uolldwnsaa ti,Jal:twind Jol ssp1AuJd IUegOSJOO VIUI II '11 . • . • ' .►019A0Jddv ASJad s s tJd Jo'slusysige AJRIsmumU Alla 'lgenbnJ.IJgsoy,Jnd uu Alesolpiress 'pSJSAltOD sq 01 woo Jo/pue •JsAilep a) Ae0J612 Jeffog ',of - XT Ttuu1 willuTg st uotsaueisop 6Utuol susJJn, sus 11M41 s)uoJJaM J1i10$ '15 . 'puPJevg, ruff Asuslunvop 110 OM VO slvp pus sum „>lutse10. '6ulsota uo uo•toSossod al polltaur 00 114Ui JesemeJnd 'ti ' 'subtl,sdsui Jo 11AgAJnt 'mu AJaasmonu Aug Ouisvnpuov to esodJnd !Ul Je# A)JldoJd pigs uodn Jsaun off JsSauaJnd ot{Joysng•Agsusu 'Jelin '1 • . ' • ')Urm,SJev still tIf" S0U0 Jaesa U1 0504zJnd sin es .gidinoo off AJasssa*u seluom puff s1USWnJlsut 11, 11la 'pualssp ubdn Atslamnl ' M 1Js11PS pus sJesaUVJnd . • r. _ dlp 1ps 114 luid loT of g le Uotslldego •ui . Jos 111WJM 110 Iv 'mongol pug st,AOJdd4 touts ito Jo adlssoi 1Je0a40J0d UOdn pogoio el ltaus Mil slut '9. • *atm pnnussul , w,Jns0ll Jn1I Jai 41l1AQJddg AJPflevelU WO Ui0100 01 Js!Sll Jnd Jo{ AJessnvSU 1IU0WneOp flu unto of OOJOg lugil"S '6 •. . . 'bsou6ts00 tlpu3 J5Rng sa sq 1IgUi luoSo BUtsoje oul 'b . • •ebn pnpt*)U1 s oesomoJnd Jul IUnlafllhx mboUltJp II)oim pun %OR 'JnMod 'Jn1n• 'JnNnm GU1pnloUi 2111211,2n 'ailgnd AJgss enU 11a Aq pnbtAJe9 sl AIJPdSJd nut 1PIiI OIUuJJm' Jp11fs 'C ' . JsAoVvund Rq OulllJM Ui mmAlom eseua %deux! 'Jame{+p JO 'sedUSJgonvu• 'SUM Ile to OW{ bq os If A*J*doid oils off 01111 'e ' 'pogo A1uaJJem RJbI •n1''ta v to uvlImMotm sisllas uodn ,. - - — • • .• • . : 'SuTSOTO To o2up off, p-ud ,tauow asnuan;l USOT AuTeopa xa Mu TTY • :loollol rev nlgoAbd , puueno4 ,o1J, pa1puny auO (00•00s'ZO1t ) ;01 AstJd eaauaJnd lu101 On •1 001/ON � paapunw nnT3 • ' • •„g„ 1%0401 se elmJlU IllUOmUSallq Dom Aug Ue,PPg1J,E*D JeusJni gq Age pits „0, 110UO3 so . 01nflu pso11a sl u,iuh i0 U011d410190 1V6e1 ' 'PM It10411US 3 s puZEt irg/ •9a U 0UK 4o Aiuommov Riialoid 1og1 ',CIJu1 Sufiolfei !u1 Ub 'f s e 'gong Jstt"S pus"Amu 01 toga,' J114atIaJ►'d 'tgJn11'S 1b 01 • p"JJ*$OJ Jn11TUfPJSUi • . Lipp, /ow ,, '•I PU! (JbfgUOJnd !M 01 00JJAI0J J1411!UIOJPU1 sWItawa Jo/puff soul 'S0WO} pvO1t(O U. M !q pug Aq asu) Wm, RgsJe4 If luo!.sJGa Outrlollol eta 10VN.N00 ON1l1N1tl, J.11V011 Y S1 Siul . • INr'U4 10V S"1Vs '3 3sVi wmfla dt1Y1 31V1SZ IV 11 8961 'ill ATTIC 91VO . , • • • • • • i ., „ -.--z: 4 . -----••-, -..---_----- •• _ ._ • ... — --- -....-..... .. ,, • • i'"'. . • ?'1+ r per below 14. Purchaser nes deposited i; ,000.00 � earnest coney in the tore ot a pt0016iory note uua C7REX�F , iGirgilUal : X In the event Purchaser tails to close this transaction, except as provltlid heroin, Seller shall pa entitled to said earnest tansy e4 total liquidated Mimegss, In the event altnur Buyer or : • ' Sailer snail institute suit or legal ar►sistance to enforce,'any rights herein, the succaaotul party shall . ha anticilaa to Court costa and/or reasonable attorneys tees. in the event of trial, tea Amount of attorneys ' f►tab shall De fixed by the court, ' • • 15. Time is of the essence of this .a9roemant.• . . . 16. Purchaser and' Sailor authorise ail Landers, £sorow Agents,. Appraisers. Tltlr.insurance Companies and other • patsies related to this transaction to furnish to 'Mother party, upon request, any and ail information • and/or copiax of docusiencs partlftAnt to this transaction: : ' • • 1I, Seller warrants that ha, she, Or they hAve disclosed all pertinent facts ra4ardtng aubjact property to Pia. • chaser. . la. Seller hereby warrants that, to the best of their knowlaago, no toxic or hazardous matertnls'havu Goan Stored or diapason of on suoject property. . . . 19. Paragraphs 2,3,0 17 and 19 shall survive closing. • . l 1I20 optional) YES NO i ' per Item 021 per DY'l/l�'t' ' LJ�'!ia f rt ltil ,� 20, Seller agrees to pay a commission ot „.Y or the total purchase price provided for herein In canh At tiuw • • of closing to be dlspursed to the agency strictly by the Escrow'A9ent; Agix i+Yiil $I iX XXXXX' • IVIIK LWXQ [.WAX1 }G�X}CX�C7C�CX}1XXXXXXXXXIC.CXXXXXXXXXXXXXX3CXXli 21. gel er tp net $92 500.00 aster nor e .os g cost an ea es om lee •, is paid. . • Good a1�cF.o B i nP ae +►sv�w A',Rr.r ,i r • ,i +— .% . 22. The $2,000.00 Earnest Honey is to be released to Sellers upon all sigjatures and be . increased by $500.00 per month until closing 23. Within two. weeks of all signatures all''necessary documents for preliminary plat . • application will be filed at City of. Renton. ' • • . . • , . 24. Purchaser will furnish Seller with monthly report •of'•progress of platting. SELLERS • . . . . . PURCHASERS • • _`�1 Lt I0..4.E _ 0(.:4.(/ 7" _ 5._ L'',- .1').d 'ickr�r x*7 -- , ,ZJC . "---- xe. e. 461 k de— . 0.r L., 5 1 i..../--,_:.. 5y . es4, .14? Ig lceich / "� DATEDI• 5 --1 --uS 9 DATEDs , These parties hereby acknowledge 1s true' and completed copy of this agreement executed by all parties hereto. SELLERS INITIALS . '' . PURCHASERS INITIALS ' _. • • DATED: '� 1 ,�^ r DAT2Dt 9r.v ' .• . . . . .. . . (opt:ionsl coincides with 11 . . . ' • • . . • 1RC OP WASITYNC`tOH • STAIE. W, LUSA/V,P , ..,.- .:•.. .�: .. . ...... ...... • . . ' I1Ini.7,HII-III iv,„ -, iilT • . -T --, r- • • • 4 Capyrlght� 7988 V Form Na,34 • Puget Sound Multiple Llating AssoclatIon Nev.Flw,VIA ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ADDENDUM/AMENDMENT.TO PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT �� The following le a part of the Purchase and Sale Agreement dated — 4L-1.41/ ' $ 4g4peller") and between lt- ai s a ("Buyer"). IT IS AGREED BETWEEN THE SELLER AND BUYER AS FOLLOWS: t% A �� CC � . • . esee„Ami. 1).- , . • r 4 __- c / , , , a a 1 r , . 1461e2-1 Ar 1. "A- ,i du. . 1..-.. AlliWie V e - o-t I/ T f 'e 5 eloo . I 4�. J i m /.. r J / 4/ . . - .. - ..,40°° .� .- 4. r. 1. ie � ' �.1 . ,IiCY. /9L/r ' / '''' evaaseis ' ' f al'Z45 0? . r#6 ItC / 'I t tip. { it. 6 / . /9 GAGA' - ._.; . A. 41- 11-A.-- Mi . - lir 1 4 d e 4 V •I ' ..,,Ai i,j,,,i ir'i elli t l i/ / �t 1 'Q'rC _ 1664e, a' • ''' :sit ii •• A np. .i_ezitei:2,ak...._, vi 0 • , , n . P _W ' r, vLLLlit /�i Y D / 1D % R. it e iuJdV4 u2I/ u.$it v . ,e4 L rlc e /f,5 . —N.^.- tl .- +.I..--41 e ' / 4 I r! 6 f/ e '/44e a dvI fiv — IA-rielpeeJ 47-4402 6e-de.4e, .R410444'6 en‘2141.4 g4).____ire 'se ALL OTHER TERMS AND CONDITIONS of said graement remain unchanged. ,n� ,� 19. . . Seller . , . ,J . . 115---.- Buyer � VI � � • Buyer AWN/ 0 la 19 — Seller V 7- ,_-iitA pat: %— '.+. 19 ____ ( Agent (Office) , y t,• -I I 1.•171,1P`'Hf IHI•I I-1C_cH 7 14IT i-T •:-T rr1 `_i Ii_i r,., .a March 20, 1989 Renton City Council Minutes Page 79 Transportation Transportation Committee Chairman Mathews presented a report Committee recommending Council concurrence in the recommendation of the Public Streets: City-Wide Works Director to delete the following items since they will be considered as Arterial Study part of the City-Wide Arterial Study: Items #9, legislation to restrict weight limit on City streets; #25, truck routes in North Renton; and #26, Metro traffic in residential areas of North Renton. The Committee recommended that Item #24, Victoria Hills revisions, be deleted from the referrals as this matter is being monitored by the Planning and Development Committee. MOVED BY MATHEWS, SECONDED BY TRIMM, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Rezone: Oakwood Ho� Letter from John Malgarini, 1058 Tacoma Avenue NE, Renton, was entered Inc., and Preliminary questioning Council action of 3/13/89 in response to his request for Plat, R-091-88, PP-091- clarification of the scope of appeal on the Oakwood Homes, Inc. rezone and 88 preliminary plat. Council had adopted a motion requiring Mr. Malgarini to file a timely appeal on the matter accompanied by required fee which would be refunded if the appeal was found to be invalid. MOVED BY MATHEWS, SECONDED BY REED, COUNCIL REFER THIS MATTER TO THE ADMINISTRATION FOR RESPONSE. CARRIED. Community Services Community Services Committee Chairman Nelson presented a report Committee regarding the 4/4/88 referral of the potential addition of Black River Quarry King County: Black River to King County's waste reduction proje9t.4he quarry site was an issue when Quarry Waste Reduction King County was considering incinerationras a viable solution to the solid waste problem. King County has shifted their emphasis to waste reduction and recycling and the issue has been resolved for the foreseeable future. The Committee recommended concurrence in the recommendation of the Planning, Manager to delete this item as it has been resolved as a result of negotiations with Tukwila and King County. MOVED BY NELSON, SECONDED BY MATHEWS, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Annexation: Fire District Community Services Committee Chairman Nelson presented a report #1 to Tukwila regarding the 4/4/88 referral of the proposed Fire District #1 annexation to the City of Tukwila. The Planning Division has worked on an interlocal agreement with Tukwila and gave testimony at the Boundary Review Board hearings on the issue. The Boundary Review Board deleted the area east of the railroad right-of-way from the annexation, and in February, 1989, the voters approved an annexation of the remaining area to Tukwila. Therefore, the Committee recommends concurrence in the recommendation of the Planning Manager to delete this item since the work has been completed. MOVED BY NELSON, SECONDED BY MATHEWS, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Finance: Fees for Animal Community Services Committee Chairman Nelson presented a report Licenses, Building regarding fees for animal licenses, building permits, and environmental Permits, and review referred on 10/17/88. Permit fees were reviewed by the Committee Environmental Review as .part of the 1989 budget process and recommended for approval. The Committee recommends concurrence in the recommendation of the Planning Manager to delete this item from the referral list. MOVED BY NELSON, SECONDED BY REED, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE. COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Utilities Committee Utilities Committee Chairman Keolker-Wheeler presented a report. Garbage: Waste Reduction recommending Council concurrence in the recommendation of the Planning and Recycling Study Manager to delete the following items as they were responded to as part of preparing.the Waste Reduction and Recycling Plan and the implementation Request for Proposals (RFPs): Item #39, Ethel Telban letter regarding garbage dumpsters; #43, petition from Renton Hill residents regarding garbage container; and #47, letter from Ideal Paper Stock Company regarding garbage contract for recycling. MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY NELSON, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED.. Utility: Bryn Mawr- Utilities Committee Chairman Keolker-Wheeler presented a report concurring Lakeridge Sewer with the recommendation of the Public Works Department to approve the Exchange for Renton proposed concept of sewage flow transfer between the City of Renton and Crowne Apartments Bryn Mawr-Lakeridge Water and Sewer District, subject to approval by the City Attorney. The Committee also recommended that the Mayor and City Clerk be authorized to execute the agreement in concept and that City staff be authorized to enter into an interlocal agreement between the City of Renton and Bryn Mawr-Lakeridge Water and Sewer District for this sewer flow exchange after the engineering plans have been approved. MOVED BY • CITY OF RENTON RECEIVED MAR. 2 01989 RENTON CITY COUNCIL MAR 2 0 1989 •200 Mi 1 1 St . So. CITY OF RENTON Renton ,-Washington 9805C5 I R CE'VED TY CLERKS OFFICE March 18, 1989 CITY COUNCIL RE: Appeal Process • Rezone & PP-091-88 • Dear Council Members: Upon returning from Arizona thursday evening, I received a letter from the city clerk outlining the action taken by the city council on Mar . 13th relating to the above mentioned . subject . In my previous correspondence to the council members, I had requested a clarification as to what was appealable and had • enclosed information regarding the appeal that was made to the Hearing Officer . I did not make the request to Mr . Kaufman as he has already made up his mind about my concerns - and according to him, my .concerns were not within the scope of the subject . My question to the council remain the same , what is the subject matter that can be cans_•i der•ed. .i n order to have a valid appeal ? I enclosed the subject matter so that you would be aware of what I had appealed to the Hearing Officer but apparently someone got the idea that I was attempting to circumvent the process and avoid paying the $75. fee . Now • you have ,requested that I file an appeal , pay the $75. and if the subject matter is not permissible evidence , then I get my $75. back . The council already have the information regarding my appeal to the Hearing Officer . There i =: nothing else that I would want to appeal and I believe the concerns that I have are valid. It is hard for me to believe that the city spent the time and money to make the preliminary reports and voice concerns about the proposed plat , then turn around and tell me I do not have appealable subjects when they are one and the same . • I will be very happy to pay the city the $75. but not to get a simple question answered. I will pay the fee when the council instructs me as to what is appealable so I may draft an intelligent appeal based on the subject matter outlined by the council . As to the timeliness of my appeal , if and when I file it , will remain a problem. I feel that council did not respond • to my first inquiry about the subject matter and should waive any time restraints that were imposed by the letter from the city clerk on March 13th . Ru • As a former Renton city councilman , it is very difficult for me to imagine someone suggesting that a person file an appeal in hopes that they may have the right subject matter . • Appeals cost time and money. I `m sure the council has other things to ,do than listen to appeals that are not valid. If Mr . Kaufman had replied to that my concerns were not sufficient to warrant any further action , it may .have been acceptable . To tell me that my concerns are not within the scope of the review process, then I begin to wonder about the process. Thanking you for your consideration in this matter ; • Sincerely: 4a4,„ 5, \YINAJilroL..,, ` John S. Malgarini 1058 Tacoma Ave . N.E. Renton , Washington 98056 226-4870 March 20, 1989 ^ Renton City Council Minutes - Page 77 WEST FENCE LINES AS PROPOSED BY GOOD SHEPHERD; AND 3) APPROVE THE REZONE, SHORT PLAT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT. Upon inquiry, it was clarified that the requirement for air conditioning can be replaced by landscaping and a performance bond can be accepted for the maintenance of the fence. ROLL CALL: 4 AYES: REED, MATHEWS, NELSON, KEOLKER-WHEELER. 2 NAYS: STREDICKE, TRIMM. CARRIED. MOVED BY MATHEWS, SECONDED BY REED, COUNCIL REFER THIS MATTER TO WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE FOR PROPER LEGISLATION. CARRIED. AUDIENCE COMMENT Roger Blaylock, 10717 NE 4th Street, Bellevue, asked the City to support Citizen Comment Legislative House Bill 1645 which prohibits location of car dealerships within Blaylock - Automobile 15 miles of each other since the restriction may represent substantial loss of Dealerships revenue to cities. He also asked Council to advance to the Planning and Development Committee report regarding the Renton Honda site approval appeal. MOVED BY REED, SECONDED BY MATHEWS, COUNCIL SUSPEND THE REGULAR ORDER OF BUSINESS AND ADVANCE TO OLD BUSINESS. CARRIED. Planning and Planning and Development Committee Chairman Reed presented a report Development Committee indicating that the committee met on 3/16/89 to consider the appeal of the Appeal: Renton Honda hearing examiner's decision, dated 1/4/89 on the Renton Honda site approval Site Approval, SA-064-88 to construct a two-story automobile dealership on the northwest corner of Grady Way and Rainier Avenue South. The hearing examiner approved the site with numerous conditions. The applicant appeals from condition #5 which prohibited the use of any outdoor public address system. The committee found that the hearing examiner committed a substantial error of fact in concluding there would be a nuisance from noise spillover, while failing to consider provisions which may mitigate the volume of the public address system (similar to the requirements imposed on the lighting) to make it non-intrusive to adjacent property owners. The committee recommended to the Council that the decision of the hearing examiner be revised, and that staff develop an acceptable noise mitigation program. Further, the committee recommended the Council require that staff monitor the program for 90 days after installation to determine whether the program may continue, be altered, or be terminated. Finally, the committee recommended the Council require that installation of the public address system be conditioned upon obtaining an occupancy permit. MOVED BY REED, SECONDED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. CONSENT AGENDA Items on the consent agenda are adopted by one motion which follows the listing. Claim: Chappon, Claim for damages in the amount of $1,280.76 filed by Joseph Chappon, CL-11-89 24301-23rd-Avenue S., Des Moines, WA, for damage to automobile as a result of hitting traffic signal pole at S. 2nd and Shattuck Avenue S. allegedly caused by failure of City to sand or salt icy roadway (02/06/89). Refer to City Attorney and insurance service. CAG: 89-007, South City Clerk reported bid opening 3/9/89 for South Talbot Hill Pipelines #W- Talbot Hill Pipelines, 965; 4 bids; engineer's estimate: $297,619.00 (corrected). Refer to Utilities #W-965 Committee. Rezone: Oakwood Home j Hearing Examiner recommended approval of Oakwood Homes, Inc. rezone Inc., and Preliminary and preliminary plat of 2.06 acres located at 763 Union Avenue NE from G- Plat, R-091-88, 1, general, to R-1, single family residential zone, for development of 10-lot PP-091-88 plat. Refer to Ways and Means Committee. (See later correspondence page 79.) Public Works: Clarke Public Works Department recommended emergency action to stabilize hillside Landslide, Lake slide area adjacent to Lake Washington Boulevard directly north of NE 51st Washington Boulevard Street (William Clarke). Refer to Ways and Means Committee for appropriate and NE 51st Street, legislation and funding. Emergency Action MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, COUNCIL APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA AS PRESENTED. CARRIED. March 13, 1989 Renton City Council Minutes Page 68 110 LID: 335, Sierra Heights Public Works/Utilities Division requested review of proposed Local Sewer Improvements Improvement District No. 335 for sanitary sewers in the Sierra Heights area. Refer to Utilities Committee. Metro: Proposed Public Works/Utilities Division requested review of proposed Metro Connection Charge connection charge. Refer to Utilities Committee. Public Works: Blaine Public Works/Utilities Division requested review of Blaine Avenue NE Avenue NE Sanitary Sanitary Sewer extension and 2-inch watermain replacement. Refer to Sewer Extension Utilities Committee. Utility: East King County Public Works/Utilities Division requested review of East King County WUCC WUCC Water Service Water Service Boundary Agreement. Refer to Utilities Committee. Boundary Agreement MOVED BY MATHEWS AND SECONDED, COUNCIL APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA AS PRESENTED. CARRIED. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS Ways and Means Ways and Means Committee Chairman Trimm presented a report Committee recommending the following ordinance for first reading: Ordinance #4207 An ordinance was read changing the zoning classification of property located Rezone: KBI Diversified, on the west side of Aberdeen Avenue NE between 973-1021 Aberdeen Inc., R-005-88 Avenue NE from R-1, single family residential, to R-3, medium density multifamily, for KBI Diversified, Ltd., File No. R-005-88. MOVED BY TRIMM, SECONDED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. Finance: City Code, Title An ordinance was read amending Title III (Departments) of City Code by III transferring certain sections to other titles of the Code Book, deleting certain sections, and making certain textual changes. MOVED BY TRIMM, SECONDED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, COUNCIL REFER THIS ORDINANCE BACK TO COMMITTEE FOR ONE WEEK. CARRIED. Ways and Means Committee Chairman Trimm presented the following resolutions for reading and adoption: Resolution #2754 A resolution was read setting a public hearing on April 17, 1989, for Vacation: VAC-89-001, consideration of vacation of a portion of Bronson Way North for petitioner, Bronson Way North, RAMAC, Inc., File No. VAC-001-89. MOVED BY TRIMM, SECONDED RAMAC, Inc. BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, COUNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED. Resolution #2755 A resolution was read segregating assessments for Parcel #24 of LID #285 LID: 285 and 312, Lot and Parcel #2 of LID #312 (SW 43rd Street and West Valley Highway) at the Segregation, SW 43rd request of property owner Nick Sciola. MOVED BY TRIMM, SECONDED Street and West Valley BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, COUNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS Highway READ. CARRIED. Vouchers Ways and Means Committee Chairman Trimm presented a report recommending approval of Vouchers 58614 through 59267 in the amount of $1,473,182.08, having received departmental certification that merchandise/services have been received or rendered; Vouchers 58974 and 58981-58983 machine voided. MOVED BY TRIMM, SECONDED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, COUNCIL APPROVE THE VOUCHERS AS PRESENTED. CARRIED. NEW BUSINESS Councilwoman Mathews entered a letter from John Malgarini, 1058 Tacoma Appeal: Oakwood Homes, Avenue NE, Renton, requesting clarification of the scope of appeal on ..Inc. Rezone and Oakwood Homes, Inc. rezone and preliminary plat, File No. R-091-88 and Preliminary Plat, R-091- PP-091-88. Response dated 3/1/89 from the Hearing Examiner to Mr. 88, PP-091-88 Malgarini's request for reconsideration on the matter indicated that most of the concerns expressed by Mr. Malgarini are outside the scope of the review process. Ms. Mathews advised that since the appeal period expires on 3/15/89, Mr. Malgarini's representative has been notified to file a timely appeal accompanied by the required $75 fee with the understanding that the {fee will be refunded if the appeal is determined to be outside the review scope. MOVED BY MATHEWS, SECONDED BY REED, COUNCIL REQUIRE THE APPELLANT TO FILE A TIMELY APPEAL ACCOMPANIED BY THE REQUIRED FEE WITH THE UNDERSTANDING THAT THE FEE WILL BE REFUNDED IF THE APPEAL IS NOT ACCEPTABLE. CARRIED. CITY OF RENTON "LL FINANCE DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor Maxine E. Motor, City Clerk March 14, 1989 Mr. John S. Malgarini 1058 Tacoma Avenue NE Renton, WA 98056 Re: Oakwood Homes, Rezone and Preliminary Plat, R-091-88 and PP-091-88 Dear Mr. Malgarini: Your letter of March 9, 1989, requesting clarification of the scope of appeal on the referenced application was discussed at the abbreviated Council meeting of March 13, 1989. In response to your letter, Council adopted a motion requiring you to file a timely appeal by 5:00 p.m. on March 15 accompanied by a $75 fee with the understanding that the fee will be refunded to you if the appeal is determined at a later date to be invalid. Since you are out of town, this information has been relayed by telephone to your daughter by the Council secretary. If further information on this matter is desired, please do not hesitate to call. • Sincerely, Maxine E. Motor, CMC City Clerk cc: Mayor Council, President Hearing Examiner Community Development Director • 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2501 RECEIVED MAR 10 1989 CITY OF RENIuN Renton City Council Mar . 9, 1 s CITY GOl1NCIL 200 Mill Ave . Bo. Renton , Washington 98055 Re : Appeal Process: Rezone & PP-091--88 • Dear Council Members: I have enclosed a letter from Mr . Fred Kaufman , Hearing Examiner for the above mention plat & rezone . The letter was sent to me in response to my appeal of his decision regarding PP-091 -88. Mr . Kaufman claims the subject matter on which I appealed his decision was not relative nor within the scope of what constitutes an appeal . I am confused then as to what matters pertaining to the proposed plat can be appealed? Before I pay the city $75.00 to appeal , I want to be sure that it is subject matter that is acceptable and debatable . Also enclosed is my appeal letter to Mr . Kaufman in which I addressed my concerns about the impact the proposed plat is going to have on the adjoining property. According to him, these matters have already been dealt wi th at the hearing. It would appear that the testimony at the hearing was very conclusive to him, but to me , the issues still remain . My first concern , not only to myself but to Mr . Barber , present owner of. 801 Union Ave . NE. , is that the proposed plat going to land-lock the back portion of Mr . Barber's property and curtail any further development of his property. The c i ty'ss preliminary report and also the minutes of the hearing indicate that this was a concern and it was suggested that something be worked out regarding this issue . According to the minutes of the hearing, quote " to date no agreement has been reached" . Mr . Kaufman has apparently taken the approach that the previous owner of 801 - & 807 Union Ave . N.E, created his own problem when he 'sub-divided the property and bu i 1 t the houses where they are . Mr . Kaufman must remember that the city issued those permits for the buildings and the sub-dividing of the property. Two wrongs do not make a right and for the hearing examiner to avoid the issue and recommend approval of the proposed plat without resolving the issue would .justify m: appealing the decision . ti My next concern was the recommendations that were made in the ERC report . It addressed the matter of what impact that the proposed plat would have on noise , soil erosion and traffic . I took photographs and presented them .i n my appeal to Mr . Kaufman showing that the property on the south side of Mr . Barber' s house is al ready washing away onto the property of the proposed plat . A bigger problem will exist because of the severe slope unless protective measures are taken by the contractor . Where will the water and soil go that wi 11 be washed away when it rains wi thout some type of retaining wall separating the properties? Do we pass these concerns and costs on to the purchasers of the new homes or do we try and resolve the problem now? In the department analysis report , it was suggested that a plan be provided for storm drainage against flooding and erosion . I was not aware from the testimony at the hearing that this had been done . Also in the department analysis report , it suggested that a site plan be provided for on-site landscaping and screening to mitigate noise , light and glare from the adjoining properties. Mr . Kaufman's reply to my appeal indicate that these issues are not within his jurisdiction when it applies to single family neighborhoods. I suggested that the developer build a solid 6 ft . fence along the northerly boundry 1 i ne as I have thoroughbred race horses on the back portion of the property and they are very high strung animals. This would curtail some of the noise during the construction period and certainly isolate the horses from the equipment that would be operating. I have $30 ,000 . invested in these animals and they were there before the plat was proposed, therefore , they did not create the problem. Mr . Kaufman's reply to me was " that he didn' t think a fence would offer much in the way of insulation against the noise that would be generated from the equipment and building process" . They build fences/buffers every day along the free-ways and residential developments, etc . to curtail these problems of noise and isolation . Why would it not work in this situation? - a Last item of concern is the report that was given regarding the Honeydew school and the traffic problem. I am aware that the new development is going to feed additional traffic onto Union Avenue . The report shows the Honeydew school as being closed, and not indicating what its use is at the . present time - which is the Renton Vocational School . The traffic that is now generated from the Honeydew school being used as a Vocational school is ten times greater than when it was open as a grade school . We now have people having to park along Union Ave because of the over-flow from the parking lot and it is causing problems along that street . The entrance to Kiwan i s Park and the cross-walk have become hard to see due to the parking of cars by students at the Vocational school . In conclu_.sian , I believe that I have some valid concerns about the proposed plat . I don' t know why they are not within the scope of an appeal when they are addressed in the preliminary and final report to the Hearing Officer . Thanking you for your response . Sincerely: John S. Malgarini 1058 Tacoma Ave . N.E. Renton , Wash .. 98056 (206) 226-4870 %o CITY OF RENTON ma HEARING EXAMINER Earl Clymer, Mayor • Fred J. Kaufman March 1, 1989 John S. Malgarini 1058 Tacoma Ave. N.V. Renton, WA 98056 Re: Oakwood Homes, Inc. Rezone & PP-091-88 Dear Mr. Malgarini: I have reviewed your letter of February 17, 1989 and my response follows. While you have some specific concerns regarding the subject proposal most, if not all of them, are outside the scope of the review process. I understand your concern regarding the skittish nature of your. thoroughbred horses, but any development of an urban nature will probably result in more noise. A fence would not appear to offer much in the way of insulation or isolation for the lot on which the horses are housed. In any event, the issue was dealt with at the hearing. Fences are generally not an issue when dealing with the juxtaposition of strictly single family development. The grade differential is also not sufficient to warrant intrusion, particularly since the applicant will not be intruding into the grade of the adjacent lot. All grading will occur according to city standards. The access issue is one whichthe owner of the adjacent lot or his predecessor-in-interest created by his actions. This office cannot condone the past platting or construction actions, but neither can it recommend that the subject site provide access through its site to the rear of the adjacent lot. If the owner of the adjacent lot is willing to pay for the access privilege, that would present a different fact situation, but as it stands it would be inappropriate to have the subject site dedicate. land to assist in rectifying a purely economic problem on an associated lot.. There is no physical limitation other than the • 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2593 adjacent lot was developed according to the instincts of its then owner, which precluded access to the large rear yard or paddock. That was that person' s choice. If this office can be of any further assistance, please feel free to write. Any appeal filed with the City Council must be filed in the City Clerk' s Office on or before 5: 00 P.M. , March 15, 1989 and it must be accompanied by a check for $75. 00. Sincerely, FRED J. KAUFMAN HEARING EXAMINER FJK/dk cc: All Parties of Record All Parties of Staff Mr . Fred J. Kaufman Feb. 17, 1989 Hearing Examiner City of Renton 200 Mill Ave . S. Renton , Wash . 98055 Dear M Kaufman : Re : Appeal of decision on ECF; R, PP-091-88 Oakwood Homes Plat . I , John S. Malgarini , acting on my behalf and that of - • Phillip R. Barber are here-by appealing the decision of the Hearing Examiner on the above mention plat : It should be noted that we have no objection to the rezoning of the property from the present zoning to RS-7200 as it is compatible with the city comprehensive plan . It should also be noted that Mr . Barber is the present owner of the property immediately north of the proposed plat and that I am in the processing of possibly purchasing that property. I do rent part of the property now as lay-up for my thorough-bred race horses which is the reason for my interest in the plat and the rezone . Our appeal to the hearing examiners decision is based upon the following: A- • The probability of land-locking the property that belongs to Mr . Barber that is immediately north of the proposed plat . Although Mr . Barber does not have any immediate plans to develop the site (approx .2/3 of an acre) he would have no access to the property that would meet the city requirements for ingress and egress in the event he decided to develop and sub-divide the property. The present drive-way that is now used by Mr . Barber for his home (photograph exhibits #1 , 2, & 3) is not wide enough to provide adequate access even though Mr . Lusa in his statement declared there was sufficient room. There is less than 16 feet from the edge of , the roof of Mr . Barbers resident to the side-yard fence of the property to the immediate north , 807 Union Ave . N.E. Mr . Spendrift , owner of 807, stated that he previously owned both of the properties, had purchased them from Mr . Jack Wilson , former Public Works Director of the City of Renton , and had attempted to sub-divide the property but the application was rejected by then Fire Chief Geisler as not adequate for proper fire protection . The only alternative for sub-dividing as presented was the development of the property immediately to the south which could conceivably provide the needed access. Although the examiner and the petitioner of the plat have taken a position that the party who developed 801 & 807 created their own problem by building as they did on the property, this is not the case . The actual development of the property and the building of the two homes was done by Mr . Wilson . What-ever agreement that was made between him and• the city regarding the configuration of the property and the homes there appears to be no record. I can see that there would be no questions regarding issueing building permits as long as there was still access from the rear and south of the property. In conclusion , the city cannot over-look the fact that this property will now be land-locked for future develpment if the proposed plat is approved in the present form. The `' suggestion of Lenora Blauman (Senior Planner) that if we wished to develop the property that we could re-locate or demolish the present home is not feasible . Relocating the present home would be a remote possiblity but the idea of demolishing an $85000 . home to acquire 3 building lots is not very sound business. If the property is allowed to be land-locked, the only potential customer for the property would be the City of Renton . They could at some time decide to expand Kiwanis Park . The testimony that indicated previous or present owners created their own problems regarding the propery, present and future , does not eliminate the obilgations of the city and the future planning of the city to review this matter prior to making any decision,. B. I have prepared other exhibits that will indicate that the testimony given by Mr . John Gosney and Mr . Steven Lusa are not all factual and if the foliwing mentioned items are not taken care of prior to acceptance of any plat , future problems could develop . At the hearing, there weren' t any topography maps' presented, nor was there any testimony given regarding potential surface water problems and drainage . Mr . Lusa did testify that the proposed property did break off very sharply from the property to the north which immediately should have indicated a potential water problem. Actually, the property does not break off as indicated until it is about 15 feet from the home of Mr . Barber . There already has been an erosion problem, the side-yard of Mr . Barber washing into the other propery (Exhibits 4-9) . When the developer starts to excavate and level the proposed development , what happens to Mr . Barbers property. This is a problem that was created by the previous builder of Mr• . Barbers home but the developer nor the city can close their eyes to the fact that a problem exists and must be dealt with . Mr . Lusa stated that he thought about putting up a fence to protect the animals from the development but that the topography of the land curtailed this. See exhibits (9-12) which indicate that the property along the property line is level and does not break off until you get about 20 feet from the house. We talked briefly with Mr . Lusa on this and also about the ingress and egress problems but with no solution to our concerns. I , Mr . Malgarini , rent this space from Mr . Barber for a lay-up for my race horses. These -4 horses are very valuable , potentially the value could be great . They are very high strung animals and the potential noise from heavy equipment , etc . could cause very serious damage to them. Noises of this type would have the tendency to make them run and there is not sufficent room in the. field to allow them to run at top speed and stop abruptly without injurying themselves. These animals were there before the proposed plat existed and there-fore even though We must look at progress and development , we must first look at what we are eliminating and try and remedy any situations that may exist from the development of the proposed property. Thanking you for your attention to this matter . Sincerely: John S. Malgarini 1058 Tacoma Ave . N.E. Renton , Wash . 98056 226-4870 cc : Mayor Clymer City Council For.Z1' 'e By City Clerk's Office Only A. I . # AGENDA ITEM RENTON CITY COUNCIL MEETING . SUBMITTING Dept./Div./Bd./Comm. Hearing Examiner For Agenda Of March 20, 1989 (Meeting Date) Staff Contact Fred J. Kaufman (Name) Agenda Status: SUBJECT: R, PP-091-88 - OAKWOOD HOMES, INC. Consent 763 Union Avenue NE. Rezone of 2.06 acres from Public Hearing Correspondence G-1 to R-1 and approval of 10 lot prelim. plat Ordinance/Resolution for future single family residential LISP_ Old Business Exhibits: (Legal Descr. , Maps, Etc.)Attach New Business Yellow File Study Session A. Other B. C. Approval : Legal Dept. Yes No N/A COUNCIL ACTION RECOMMENDED: Finance Dept. Yes No. N/A REFER TO WAYS AND MEANS Other Clearance FISCAL IMPACT: Expenditure Required $ Amount $ Appropriation- $ Budgeted Transfer Required SUMMARY (Background information, prior action and effect of implementation) (Attach additional pages if necessary. ) The applicant wishes to rezone and obtain approval to create a 1.0 lot preliminary plat for future residential development. The matter was heard by the Hearing Examiner on January 24, 1989 and he issued his recommendation of approval by the City Council on February 7, 1989. The only condition requested was the applicant comply with the ERC conditions. A request for reconsideration was filed on 2/21/89 and the reply from the Examiner was sent 3/1/89. No appeals have been filed. PARTIES OF RECORD/INTERESTED CITIZENS TO BE CONTACTED: Yellow File SUBMIT THIS COPY TO CITY CLERK BY NOON ON. THURSDAY WITH DOCUMENTATION. 16 CITY OF RENTON HEARING EXAMINER Earl Clymer, Mayor Fred J. Kaufman March 16, 1989 Steve Lusa 18712 - 142nd NE Woodinville, WA 98072 RE: Oakwood Homes, Inc. File No. R-091-88 and PP-091-88 Dear Mr. Lusa: The Examiner's Report and Recommendation regarding the referenced request has not been appealed within the time period established by ordinance. Therefore, this matter is being submitted to the City Clerk this date for transmittal to the City Council for review. You will receive notification of final approval, as well as a copy of the enacting ordinance, from the City Clerk upon adoption by the City Council. You will be notified of all action taken by the City Council upon approval of the request. Please feel free to contact this office if further assistance or information is required. Sincerely, FRED J. KAUFMAN HEARING EXAMINER FJK:dk cc: amity Clerk Building Division Planning Division 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2593 e 4'o CITY OF RENTON HEARING EXAMINER Earl Clymer, Mayor Fred J. Kaufman • March 1, 1989 John S. Malgarini 1058 Tacoma Ave. N.E. Renton, WA 98056 Re: Oakwood Homes, Inc. Rezone & PP-091-88 Dear Mr. Malgarini: I have reviewed your letter of February 17, 1989 and my response follows. While you have some specific concerns regarding the subject proposal most, if not all of them, are outside the scope of the review process. I understand your concern regarding the skittish nature of your thoroughbred horses, but any development of an urban nature will probably result in more noise. A fence would not appear to offer much in the way of insulation or isolation for the lot on which the horses are housed. In any event, the issue was dealt with at the hearing. Fences are generally not an issue when dealing with the juxtaposition of strictly single family development. The grade differential is also not sufficient to warrant intrusion, particularly since the applicant will not be intruding into the grade of the adjacent lot. All grading will occur according to city standards. The access issue is one which the owner of the adjacent lot or his predecessor-in-interest created by his actions. This office cannot condone the past platting or construction actions, but neither can it recommend that the subject site provide access through its site to the rear of the adjacent lot. If the owner of the adjacent lot is willing to pay for the access privilege, that would present a different fact situation, but as it stands it would be inappropriate to have the subject site dedicate land to assist in rectifying a purely economic problem on an associated lot. There is no physical limitation other than the 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2593 /f t. adjacent lot was developed according to the instincts of its then owner, which precluded access to the large rear yard or paddock. That was that person's choice. If this office can be of any further assistance, please feel free to write. Any appeal filed with the City Council must be filed in the City Clerk's Office on or before 5: 00 P.M. , March 15. 1989 and it must be accompanied by a check for $75. 00. Sincerely, FRED J. KAUFMAN HEARING EXAMINER FJK/dk cc: All Parties of Record All Parties of Staff 4 Mr . Fred J. Kaufman Feb. 17, 1989 �- . Hearing Examiner � � �� "» City of Renton 200 Mill Ave . S. EEB 21 1989 Renton , Wash . 98055 Dear M Kaufman : Re : AppealN 5�� eF ���® of dec t41€A6.enta IrXXAMIMER ECF; R, PP-091-88 Oakwood Homes Plat . I , John S. Malgarini , acting on my behalf and that of Phillip R. Barber are here-by appealing the decision of the Hearing Examiner on the above mention plat . It should be noted that we have no objection to the rezoning of the property from the present zoning to RS-7200 as it is compatible with the city comprehensive plan . It should also be noted that Mr . Barber is the present owner of the property immediately north of the proposed plat and that I am in the processing of possibly purchasing that property. I do rent part of the property now as lay-up for my thorough-bred race horses which is the reason for my interest in the plat and the rezone . Our appeal to the hearing examiners decision is based upon the following: A- The probability of land-locking the property that belongs to Mr . Barber that is immediately north of the proposed plat . Although Mr . Barber does not have any immediate plans to develop the site {approx..2/3 of an acre) he would have no access to the property that would meet the city requirements for ingress and egress in the event he decided to develop and sub-divide the property. The present drive-way that is now used by Mr . Barber for his home (photograph exhibits #1 , 2, & 3) is not wide enough to provide adequate access even though Mr . Lusa in his statement declared there was sufficient room. There is less than 16 feet from the edge of the roof of Mr . Barbers resident to the side-yard fence of the property to the immediate north , 807 Union Ave . N.E. Mr . Spendrift , owner of 807, stated that he previously owned both of the properties, had purchased them from Mr . Jack Wilson , former Public Works Director of the City of Renton , and had attempted to sub-divide the property but the application was rejected by then Fire Chief Geisler as not adequate for proper fire protection . The only alternative for sub-dividing as presented was the development of the property immediately to the south which could conceivably provide the needed access. Although the examiner and the petitioner of the plat have taken a position that the party who developed 801 & 807 created their own problem by building as they did an the property, this is not the case . The actual development of the property and the building of the two homes was done by Mr . Wilson . What-ever agreement that was made between him • and the city regarding the configuration of the property and the homes there appears to be no record. I can see that there would be no questions regarding issueing building permits as long as there was still access from the rear and south of the property. In conclusion , the city cannot over-look the fact that this property will now be land-locked for future develpment if • the proposed plat is approved in the present form. The suggestion of Lenora Blauman <Senior Planner) that if we wished to develop the property that we could re-locate or demolish the present home is not feasible . Relocating the present home would be a remote possiblity but the idea of demolishing an $85000 . home to acquire 3 building lots is not very sound business. If the property is allowed to be land-locked, the only potential customer for the property would be the City of Renton . They could at some time decide to expand Kiwanis Park . The testimony that -indicated previous or present owners created their own problems regarding the propery, present and future , does not eliminate the obligations of the city and the future planning of the city to review this matter prior to making any decision . B. I have prepared other exhibits that will indicate that the testimony given by Mr . John Gosney and Mr . Steven Lusa are not all factual and if the follwing mentioned items are not taken care of prior to acceptance of any plat , future problems could develop . At the hearing, there weren' t any topography maps presented, nor was there any testimony given regarding potential surface water problems and drainage . Mr . Lusa did testify that the proposed property did break off very sharply from the property to the north which immediately should have indicated a potential water problem. Actually, the property does not break off as indicated until it is about 15 feet from the home of Mr . Barber . There already has been an erosion problem, the side-yard of Mr . Barber washing into the other propery (Exhibits 4-9) . When the developer starts to excavate and level the proposed development , what happens to Mr . Barbers property. This is a problem that was created by the previous builder of Mr . Barbers home but the developer nor the city can close their eyes to the fact that a problem exists and must be dealt with . Mr . Lusa stated that he thought about putting up- a fence to protect the animals from the development but that the topography of the land curtailed this. See exhibits <9-12) which indicate that the property along the property line is level and does not break off until you get about 20 feet from the house . We talked briefly with Mr . Lusa on this and also about the ingress and egress problems but with no solution to our concerns. I , Mr• . Malgarini , rent this space from Mr• . Barber• for a lay-up for my race horses. These horses are very valuable , potentially the value could be great . They are very high strung animals and the potential noise from heavy equipment , etc . could cause very serious damage to them. Noises of this type would have the tendency to make them run and there is not sufficent room in the field to allow them to run at top speed and stop abruptly without injurying themselves. These animals were there before the proposed plat existed and there-fore even though we must look at progress and development , we must first look at what we are eliminating and try and remedy any situations that may exist from the development of the proposed property. Thanking you for your attention to this matter . Sincerely: John S. Malgarini 1058 Tacoma Ave . N.E. Renton , Wash . 98056 226-4870 cc : Mayor Clymer City Council AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING STATE OF WASHINGTON ) )ss. County of King ) DOTTY KLINGMAN being first duly sworn, upon oath, deposes and states: That on the 7th day, of February , 1989 affiant deposited in the mails of the United States a sealed envelope containing a decision or recommendation with postage prepaid, addressed to the parties of record in the below entitled application or petition. i -47 SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this 77d day of ICE , 1989 2 - NoyPubic in and for the State of Washington, - residing at -,��4)t-D , therein. Application, Petition, or Case #: OAKWOOD HOMES, INC. (The minutes contain a list of the parties of record.) February 7, 1989 OFFICE OF THE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION APPLICANT: OAKWOOD HOMES, INC. File No: R-091-88 and PP-091-88 LOCATION: 763 Union Avenue NE SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Rezone of 2.06 acres from G-1 to R-1 and approval of a 10 lot preliminary plat for future single family residential use. SUMMARY OF ACTION: Planning Division Recommendation: Approval, with conditions. PLANNING DIVISION REPORT: The Planning Division Report was received by the Examiner on January 17, 1989 PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Planning Division Report, examining available information on file with the application, and field checking the property and surrounding area, the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: MINUTES The hearing was opened on January 24, 1989 at 9:00 A.M. in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. The following exhibits were entered into the record: Exhibit #1 - Yellow File containing application, proof of posting and publication and other documentation pertinent to this request. Exhibit #2 - Aerial Vicinity Map Exhibit #3 - Standard Vicinity Map Exhibit #4 - Preliminary Plat Map The hearing opened with a presentation of the staff report by Lenora Blauman, Senior Planner. This property is presently zoned for general uses and is surrounded by single family developments. Ms. Blauman pointed out that public utilities are available to the site; public amenities are in close proximity; this is a non-project rezone; the applicant wishes to rezone from the 35,000 sq. ft. lot size to the R-1 zone to permit smaller lots of 7200 sq. ft. which permits a higher density of development. The ERC reviewed the application and issued mitigated conditions requesting the applicant to provide a storm drainage and erosion plan, a tree inventory and preservation plan, provide trip assessment fees for improvements to ensure safety of access, and a site plan for on-site landscaping to mitigate noise, light and glare to adjacent properties. In reviewing the rezone request Ms. Blauman outlined the criteria considered by staff noting the site has not been considered for a rezone since 1953; the property is now designated for single family use in the Comprehensive Plan and is consistent with the goals and objectives of the Plan; there has been increased development in this area which leads to the belief the proposal is timely; public utilities and services are available to the site and the site is capable of allowing additional improvements to accommodate any future development. Ms. Blauman continued reviewing the comments of staff for the rezone and noted their recommendation for approval. In reviewing the Preliminary Plat request she noted the proposal meets the requirements of the zoning codes regarding yards, setbacks and lot sizes noting lot #1 and 10 are corner lots; new roadways do conform to subdivision requirements as well as lot dimensions; boundaries are reasonable with no direct adverse impacts expected; the lots have addressed the topography of the site and lot layout is compatible with neighboring lots zoned R-1, with only a possible impact to the property on the north which remains G-1 because of that's lots configuration. If the northern lot chose to develop in the future it is possible that access to the Oakwood Homes, Inc. R-091-88 and PP-091-88 February 7, 1989 Page 2 property would not be available. The applicant has been directed by staff to contact the northern property owner and try to work out an access agreement. To date no agreement has not been reached. Ms. Blauman stated staff felt this preliminary plat was timely; appropriate with regard to other construction on surrounding properties in close proximity; the 10 additional homes would be appropriate and the 10 homes should produce approximately 100 vehicle trips per day with 3 students added into the school system. Emergency services are available to the plat. With the above analysis staff has recommended the Hearing Examiner recommend approval of these requests to the City Council subject to the condition the applicant comply with the ERC conditions as set out on November 30, 1988. Calling for testimony from the applicant or their representative, responding was John Godsev, 12655 SW Center, Suite 360, Beaverton. Oregon 97005. Regarding the zoning request he stated the applicant has met the criteria set out by staff. The preliminary plat also meets the criteria and Mr. Godsey noted for the record the map presented contains modifications requested by staff. He said they concur with all of the conclusions of staff. Discussing the possible access problem with the northernmost property owner he stated it is not felt that the property owner should even have been considered for access to that site as the property previously had been subdivided by the property owner and structures put on the site - and he felt when that development took place the property owner at that time had the opportunity to preserve access but chose not to. He said that the property has about 20 ft. left between the structure and the property line at the back of the property should that property owner decide to develop in the future. Mr. Godsey does not feel this applicant, (Oakwood Homes), should be required to provide access to another parcel of property when a previous owner developed that particular property in the current fashion. Questions arose from John Malgarini, 1058 Tacoma Avenue NE, Renton 98056 representing Mr. Barber, owner of the adjacent northern parcel with regard to access. He said he personally is purchasing 801 Union Avenue NE, north of the proposed preliminary plat, and does not oppose the suggested plat development. He noted the property he is purchasing is still G-1 and is concerned regarding the access should he decide to develop the property. He was not sure how the previous owner and the city permitted the houses to be build in the-configuration they are currently, without ingress and egress. With the general use zoning on the property there are valuable animals on the property and he questioned what type of fencing would be required on the proposed Oakwood Homes preliminary plat. The Examiner noted the city does not take a position regarding fencing in single family neighborhoods. Mr. Malgarini expressed concern at the possibility his property may be landlocked and may curtail any future development plans. He felt the problem lies either with the original platting and subdividing of the property to the north feeling there must have been some agreement for access at the time they obtained the building permits. The Examiner said he will explore the matter as the platting ordinance does provide for reasonable access to all properties within the city. Mr. Malgarini said 801 was not the developer (807 was the developer) and again questioned what arrangements may have been worked out with the city at that time for development and access. Ms. Blauman stated at this point she has no history on the properties involved and agreed an option may be to relocate or demolish the home on the property. Mr. Malgarini suggested the city check the platting on the 801 and 807 properties before proceeding with the subdivision of the Oakwood Homes property. Also testifying was Steven Lusa, 18712 - 142nd NE, Woodinville, 98072. Mr. Lusa, also representing the applicant, and stated they have met with Mr. Barber and Mr. Malgarini on the site involved and discussed the access issue and fencing - and noted for the record that the property to the north was subdivided by the current resident of 807. In his subdivision he is allowed more than adequate access on the north property line of 807 (approximately 40 feet remains). Lusa said if anyone should be burdened with the access problem it should be the resident, subdivider and builder of 801 who is currently the resident of lot 807. He said it is not his or the applicant's view that lot 801 is landlocked - but if it is determined that it is, 807 should carry the burden of the situation he created. Lusa said if the back of the property is developed to the extent of one or two lots there are a couple of different accesses equal to or larger than what the applicant could realistically provide within their plat without a substantial economic negative impact. Commenting on fencing, Mr. Lusa said it was reviewed and felt the topography of the site would constrain them severely. He said the north property line is below 801's south property line and there would be no need for fencing. He felt the same would be considered by the city with regard to the suggested landscape screen - it would serve no purpose due to topography. He had no further comments. The Examiner called for further testimony regarding this project. There was no one else wishing to speak, and no further comments from staff. The hearing closed at 9:45 A.M. Oakwood Homes, Inc. - R-091-88 and PP-091-88 February 7, 1989 Page 3 FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & DECISION: Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: 1. The applicant, Oakwood Homes, Inc., filed a request for approval of a reclassification of approximately 2.06 acres from General (Single Family; Lot size - 35,000 sq. ft.) to R-1 (Single Family; Lot size - 7,200 sq ft), together with a 10 lot Preliminary Plat on the same acreage. 2. The yellow file containing the staff report, the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) documentation and other pertinent materials was entered into the record as Exhibit #1. 3. The Environmental Review Committee (ERC), the City's responsible official, issued a Declaration of Non-Significance (DNS) for the subject proposal. 4. The subject proposal was reviewed by all departments with an interest in the matter. 5. The subject site is located at 763 Union Avenue N.E. The site is located on the west side of Union, two lots south of Kiwanis Park. 6. The subject site was part of the original townsite of the City of Renton. The site was classified to G-1,, its current zoning, with the initial zoning of the city. 7. The map element of the Comprehensive Plan designates the area in which the subject site is located as suitable for the development of single family uses, but does not mandate such development without consideration of other policies of the plan. 8. The subject site rises slightly toward its northwest corner, gaining approximately 10 feet. 9. The parcel is approximately 272 feet wide by approximately 330 feet deep. 10. With the exception of the Kiwanis Park north of the subject site and the Honey Dew School across Union, the area is developed primarily with single family homes. Some of these homes are located on larger lots, some on lots which generally meet the standards of the R-1 district. 11. North and east of the subject site is an R-1 district, the district zoning the applicant has requested. The multiple block G-1 zone containing the subject site extends to the west and south of the site. Many of the lots within the G-1 district are subdivided under lesser standards than the G-1 zone requires and are probably non-conforming as to lot size. 12. The site is served by a six inch water line which connects to a 12 inch line along Union. The Honey Dew lift station and an eight inch sewer line provide sanitary sewer service to the site. Storm water is channeled into a 15 inch pipe. The plat will have to provide a storm water detention/retention system to prevent downstream erosion problems along Maplewood Creek. 13. Honey Dew School is not open and the site would be served by Highlands Elementary, Mcknight Middle and Renton High schools, the furthermost approximately 2.5 miles from the site. 14. The applicant proposes dividing the subject site into ten (10) single family lots. Proposed Lot 1 would be at the northeast corner of the plat, with the numbering continuing counterclockwise. Proposed Lot 10 would be at the southeast corner of the site. 15. A new street, N.E. 7th Court, would serve the subject site. It would be a cul-de-sac street approximately 100 feet long with a 45 foot turning radius. 16. Proposed Lots 1 and 10, corner lots on the cul-de-sac and Union,are platted at 70.03 feet wide. The interior lots adjacent to the corner lots are approximately 62 feet wide. Lots 2 through 8 are wedge or pie shaped, a shape determined by the cul-de-sac bulb. Lots 1, 2, 9 and 10 are generally rectangular. 17. Lots 1 and 10 are just over 7,600 square feet in area, while the remaining eight lots all exceed the required 7,200 square foot minimum standards of the R-1 zone - they are each just over 7,200 square feet in area. 18. Development of the ten-lot plat would generate approximately 100 vehicle trips per day, approximately 90 more than the existing single lot could generate. Staff found that Union and both 4th and Sunset could accommodate the additional trips per day. Oakwood Homes, Inc. R-091-88 and PP-091-88 February 7, 1989 Page 4 19. Ten new homes would generate approximately 3 additional students given the standard .25 students per home. The school district indicates that these new students can be accommodated at vicinity schools. 20. Immediately north of the subject site are two single family homes. Both homes are located on large lots, but the homes are located in such a fashion that access to the rear of both parcels would require a pipestem access between them or along the north side of the northerly lot. Access could also be achieved through the subject site. This access could only be accommodated by creating a northerly extension of the proposed N.E. 7th Court, but only by restricting the number of lots which may be created on the subject site. CONCLUSIONS REZONE 1. The proponent of a rezone must demonstrate that the request is in the public interest, that it will not impair the public health, safety and welfare and in addition, complies with at least one of the criteria found in Section 4-3010, which provides in part that: a. The subject site has not been considered in a previous area-wide rezone or land use analysis; or - b. The subject site is potentially designated for the new classification per the Comprehensive Plan; or c. There has been a material and substantial change in the area in which the subject site is located since the last rezoning of the property or area. The requested classification is justified and should be approved by the City Council. 2. Since the initial adoption of the Zoning Code, the subject site has not been considered for reclassification. The zoning requested is compatible with the designation in the Comprehensive Plan. The Plan specifies that single family uses are suitable on the subject site. 3. In addition to compatibility with the Comprehensive Plan, the proposed zoning is compatible with the zoning and uses surrounding the subject site. Single family uses are located north, east, south and west of the site. R-1 zoning, the category requested, is found east, north and west of the site. It is also compatible with the predominant lot size found in the area, the standard 7,200 square foot lot. 4. The site is located in one of the fastest growing quadrants of the city. A variety of new housing including other single family homes and some duplex buildings have been constructed along Union and in the general vicinity. New commercial uses have also been established along N.E. 4th not too far south of the site. 5. The build-out of housing permitted under the requested zoning would add nine new units over the existing density. These additional units will not adversely affect the public health, safety or welfare. (See plat discussion below). 6. Therefore, since the request is compatible with both the Comprehensive Plan and the surrounding uses and zoning, the City Council should approve the reclassification of the subject site from G-1 to R-1. PRELIMINARY PLAT 7. The proposed ten-lot plat appears to serve the public use and interest. This development is not expected to burden either the existing utilities or the roads, nor will the anticipated 3 additional students adversely affect the school system. 8. Development of this single family plat will provide additional single family housing opportunities in an area well served by commercial development along the N.E. 4th corridor and by the existing utility infrastructure. As an in-fill project in an area fairly well developed and defined as a single family community, an additional benefit is that sprawl into less well served areas will be avoided. • Oakwood Homes, Inc. R-091-88 and PP-091-88 February 7, 1989 Page 5 9. The proposed lots meet, and generally exceed, the minimum lot size required in the R-1 zone. The lots are each at least 7,200 square feet in area. Each of the lots provide reasonable building envelopes. Adequate sideyards, and in the case of corner lots, dual frontyard setbacks have been provided. 10. N.E. 7th Court meets the city standards for length, width and turning radius for a cul-de-sac. Again, the corner lots platted wider than interior lots provide adequate area to meet the wider sideyard requirements of corner lots. 11. While only four of the proposed lots are roughly rectangular, the other lots, generally wedge shaped, meet the standards found in modern plats, particularly those situated around cul-de- sacs. 12. The additional vehicle trips the ten new homes will generate, approximately 100 vehicle trips per day, approximately 10 of which would occur during the AM peak hour commute, will not adversely affect traffic. Staff will have to demonstrate that any mitigation fees are based on adopted formulas. 13. This office has difficulty attempting to solve or recommend a solution to any access problem which exists for the neighboring property or properties to the north. The owner, or the owner's predecessor in interest, divided the property and erected homes in such a fashion as to greatly restrict access to interior portions of one or both northerly lots. That problem should not be used to exact dedications from the property which is the subject of this plat proposal. This office would entertain and suggest that the City Council entertain a solution which is mutually satisfactory to the various parties including acquisition by the northerly property of a roadway through the subject plat. This office cannot recommend that the City Council mandate it. 14. In conclusion, the City Council should approve both the Rezone and Preliminary Plat requests. RECOMMENDATION The City Council should approve both the Rezone and Preliminary Plat requests subject to the following condition: 1. The applicant shall comply with the conditions imposed by the ERC. ORDERED THIS 7th day of February, 1989. FRED J. K FMAN HEARING EXAMINER TRANSMITTED THIS 7th day of February, 1989 to the parties of record: John Godsey 12655 SW Center, Suite 360 Beaverton, Oregon 97005 John Malgarini 1058 Tacoma Avenue NE Renton, WA 98056 Steven Lusa 18712 - 142nd NE Woodinville, WA 98072 Phillip. R. Barber 801 Union Avenue N.E. Renton, WA 98055 Julius P. Grant, Jr. 6020 Seward Park Ave. So. Seattle, WA 98118 Oakwood Homes, Inc. R-091-88 and PP-091-88 February 7, 1989 Page 6 TRANSMITTED THIS 7th day of February, 1989 to the following: Mayor Earl Clymer Councilman Richard M. Stredicke Don Erickson, Zoning Administrator Lynn A. Guttmann, Public Works Director Members, Renton Planning Commission Don Monaghan, Acting Engineering Supervisor Glen Gordon, Fire Marshal Larry M. Springer, Planning Manager Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Ronald Nelson, Building Director Gary Norris, Traffic Engineer John Adamson, Developmental Program Coordinator Garth Cray, Senior Engineering Specialist Valley Daily News Pursuant to Title IV, Section 3015 of the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 P.M. February 21, 1989. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is ambiguous or based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for a review by the Examiner within fourteen (14) days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific ambiguities or errors discovered by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record, take further action as he deems proper. An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Section 3016, which requires that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk, accompanying a filing fee of $75.00 and meeting other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection or purchase in the Finance Department, first floor of City Hall. The Appearance of Fairness Doctrine provides that no ex parte (private one-on-one) communications may occur concerning pending land use decisions. This means that parties to a land use decision may not communicate in private with any decision-maker concerning the proposal. Decision-makers in the land use process include both the Hearing Examiner and members of the City Council. All communications concerning the proposal must be made in public. This public communication permits all interested parties to know the contents of the communication and would allow them to openly rebut the evidence. Any violation of this doctrine would result in the invalidation of the request by the Court. The Doctrine applies not only to the initial public hearing but to all Requests for Reconsideration as well as Appeals to the City Council. • . ,••,_ . . , , .cale 1 " ="2UUW • ,-.• ,•,...._ :...,..,,,,:.•••,... . ••• •..,. ,::.. - 1,, , •. • :..,,•-•,.......,...••••,..:,.....,:::.:„..,... 7: '••••. - , a.:••••• :":,i- s:--••..!•;:-.,-••,..,.:„....i.,;•••,:f.:,,I.,••,.. , ,, ,.....„.-.., :-:-,..,.-:.: r. 4••::•.' '.... . ''' • ••••;',.s.7;.::....,:.:,:‘,....:' ..:.•.:.i....;.,.1 .,:... .--..,4--, ,,,-L,,.::::,;.;.,... '....:.,.;!;.::::;.;:.:(.,..,.....: ,.:.:-.,.;.. ' • • ••: ..: . ,.. , §. r° ' • 1 • • •• r..,- .'.1,•si,,,i4g.....,'".".•.- , • r. •• --- c•-•0•'!••• .: .... ..1 •'•.' .„ • •?..,•,...'•'' _,I - __- -______,___ . '•:::,•.`-',.';:;,... I< ':- , •.. •. ... . I . 't_ ...... _ _ __,..- •a '.,..: '.,.: . .. I N - -• ,-.•,•„ . ,• .,, • . . ,..:., . •_or__ . , .-.:,.....:•-•,.•••• • -, --::••••••-,r.I 00000000.pc ,000000000. o' • o 0000000• 144c- ' ....... , •—•- lialli I 1 1 • , " ••,,... ..p •.... • 17 * , ., . , . • 4/-•• I 1:::. '•'-' / 1 '--- : 147!:?(-; Itiii /•!,'','.1:•': i!. .r, r*— • .. i-ci 1 — V •:•::: • ...' ::::::: • ::::::: •.:. '.`q tor::: :.: , ,-..-.:.,..,:. .11.... ......!.- :,.;.. . IN, 1-1------ -•-••-- ...,c,-; :.:.::: • vri•::i.„..,,, .. .___..._:_, ..—:.,..444willip' ...,- 64...'4,,, , .r ..•::•• • ,o..0, -...J:: ..J d , 1 .:•:. .", iI,0 0 0 0 4 • -.. • 1 . ',..[!;',... 1 ._ ,..„,..•.....1 (11.0.0.0, .iiii:iii:ii: :.771 .A _ _ y. )11 --T il __ NJ:.:• . ...._.-- :.--.0 ... r 0.9,1 0, i,, _ 1 .. . .. ',,... 1\ 1 11:).i.:.1.i.:::::::.::::::..--.... ::::::::::::::::::.:::::. ••••.40 • •'• • ii•:: i ::.• •1 1:,o o<kid i ••000000( P .•' '•'. 1 h:•:•....... alma ... .."" ... --. ..::::::::::::::::::::: c aa r.• 1. .. , I .,00000000 00000000 c• ' -m=-11"....,•::::::::::::::::::1./. ', • II-• .00.0. r•.4:,. , .s' 000000 00000( 000000 • rin0 *36::1 ,••p.,••• ,....:. r•:•i:::.:..:''''.4-.,., i•:.%t? 4# ••,,,-0, , . • • • •.. :::::i:i*:::: .:." - 1 L.-,...-J .. .. • • . a 'i:::::::: ... ••• — il ',II .• ME= , 0000. • • '' ::::::::::: D • • • ..',. : i:' ..; • • • ::,',' • 'ref:i.... •—•— -• ' r' a No°o°o°oc WM • I . La, oo• .•. D • • • •....:, •.:. . T E • , •000•30.000•31 .•.•• ••••••:•••' •• • • •. • •..', .: •---C,.1 `,.i7Eilt IIAD._• 0 '<, sr•Cr " a, ../. ;• • • • ••I — ----_. ,•..0 , . o. .:. : , ,a < i • • • • •,.; k .--.:-. , 0 0 F.1• • it. • '`,.' , - • •0(I ,0)0 ......•.::.:::::..i.: :::..... D • • 6 • -;".;•,- .0, 1 .1. • • • •e 'c I _,.._ ,gi !. :•:•::::::::•• ...:*x:i:i:::•••"4434.1ti I . "••••"."..,." .0 • • 4 • '.1.. ' . .::..::: 1,,0 , . o c • • • • • ..''i ‘. ::.:•:.: : In)0 s•••••4••• •',':,:..- _ . 1,:.:i•:.!-.•• !,. ;,,1 N, 7vi \iiii. [Ti • ID • • • ,• .' . ' '•'''': . " °1. .'•::: ::::::::::::::: :::. IMF IL 1 :i:•:•.•::•:: e•:.,0 •ii 0 i,op •::::.:•: •••7•-• • If (---- e. 0.no .:.:.:.: ::. „. , :.:.:.:. .:. 0. noo .::::::: :.. 1111 'I :1:, . (FL....„„.... .., :::iii:.::Iiiiii:i.:•.K:m:.:.:.:: ___. ., ,,....,,...., :i::*....•:::::::...:i:. ... . • • NI._ _ !.....,......'(.•••••1,*••• - • .1 -.T.---..; OM MO ::::::::::::::::::iiiiiii:ii*i:: : 1111-f-r• iti 1p 4, ..• ,,....:.:::::::::::::::::::,:„... - ., killi wm,•;•411•,viii;. 110111111111111 g I.1.11111,10....:9.::::::::::i:::: • 1111:111, 1/ j',:.;.,•-4 ' ii. i..ii.•:i.ii.ii.iiiiii::::•:*. ....•:: I • • ::::ii::::i•ii•i.:•:••••:.:.:.:.i•oi:g] :: . I 1 iir Ir• rp, •.9,..A.s.•• •••iii:ii:•:••• ....;: iiii:. '4%11'41;111)°,11;;',170%%%7T41' :::::i7.7::::::7 .1111111 .:iiiiii Iiiii!:iiiii: :.1•::;imin., : • . $P 4-, v.- br ..:.: ii: .roquou,?on(v,;prpoogluouou,,. 411 • .., ....-...:,..- . •.::iiii:miiiii:iiiiiiiiiii:i PoTIV09-P41-Mlf°(741%%141)%1 . 0, ':aii :•••••••::::i:i::.•:.::::::...:xf:*::::•;:i:::.•.:•••••• . •. • ), r. , .•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:.:• aloorm000m noon000noo ,•:•:•:. • A . .----••, .-• .•- •••. -:i:i:::i:::i:i:i:i:i:i:i:i*i:i:]:i. ,.,04,c,c,noo,, t,noncl0000r 1...:,:. 1 11115 An • tra .• ••:•:•:•:•:•:•::::::::::::::::::::. ,ocmor,r,ono c, ,•,',.• !"--41 W Pl.::' ' ,..) . • '::::::::::::.I.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.: "0°°""""WA",To°0"j'az 00c ac; I:,:,.:.:.:.:...::. r.,, r ,01: q •',. 1 ccii:H,(1 ' .. •aNiimii Iiiiii:00°0`,1,0r6ovonomenoorboov000lf I...:::::::::::::::•::: • ...i: ory...„ .. .i::i:i:::i*i::*:::i.::i::i .... . .f,.o.a..0,, ,I I ,., 1, 00 ; :•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•::•• 1 it,'„0,',...( . .......................x.: .,„r......0.00,1n :: •...1.1.,.:....... .00.0.000 s, .000,000. e. ,.--•,c,-- :, - i • :. -.•,,,..: ,..., _ ,:. :::::::::::::::::::::::., . .............. • .,:,:,:,:,:::::::,„:,:,:. ,.....0.0 .,.. „:„.:.:.::: .., .., • .7 , ...... MON , . •:-.-vidli-4..'''.. (\-: ;Q).. .••;;;',. 2;,;.;?!(•,:•;.,=,..:•!,...7......:',:ii: ..:•::: -- i. .16.).: • •••:41 - k • -''. ri.,: ,. --. A.,4,,,-43. ., i ,:' :::Mii:i*:. .,,;.:i'-. ;,.'1,,.!,:;:•;;;'.;:,::,:n;•••.1,:e5.!,!. 1: :,:': : ::::':i::: v. r,• .••• ....,-•,')'::).'--5,':1"-••,-.•,/,'?10'.•:. :.:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•.•• 1:::Sil..Ii•t.':::;:(':;V:7)7:1:i-V4'..4b:C:1';').....11:27::'341...:::''''!;•:?,'''' :','''';'br;.?::•?'.:,-1,...-','•••'.3.5,;:jr;•';•;'',.:`',./f..,••,':;;/;:-. ;,-'f1;;';';-..r.••;iFI•;.", ....:.:'1.:•:::::.:;.::;. 11W° .1',:t4',i' .0;•.;?`3..;- '111176-4 . ';•••'''f''' '':•..4z14e,CW Ill"1.'1,.!•/;!.i'.';•?•'•P'%'•:•:'..;;',2.;'•'2'''.'"''' .;-,::',:f;J:::•. .,f,!,:%.e.:••,....':':::::•:::::: . .39' y••• t • . r •',•11••• •••%1;.•;:.?i.•,t,., .k. • 4,4'.. • Ilk „(k• • ,r)1.rit!; -A r \ ' . ...,':;;'..!;;;';' ' !.,Zr5,-,••('''' • - I:-h".-::;; - 'kk. -r,v ,...,..ort. ,,,,, „... •••.'.,,,,,,,3,,.••,',,,,.().., • ,1., c cyA5,-i.,.. 0.1.,,•••,•;.•-,,..• ,40. 4 ,:t.:42,;;:./.. ,• 0,-- \ -..,,,,4-:,,,,,..„::: :::;,....., .. .,. , ,e;,0.4.,'i• *ii) • •;.‘•.q,-.,......:.,,,I,,,.,,,v,„,....._17.......,2, -.•-•_t•.",rr.•-• ;14,4 Ake* :.. ,.,•ei5,4. , i,, ,...,..;.... . , k,.,-•::rre,,5,, ,e. ..,,: :,. ..f . • - -milt',.(:vs•V . rk....*c• C.,.r . ,..y..q,::,-3.,,- ..",!.,..1 •.,:--„_,,,,,-,•.••,,,,, , -,.. .•..(,"•-,,,.e, - 4-... • . _..- 't., ,..,,p,'• , . •6. • -_. „, 1 „ . 41_ .c: .0 ( 111 I .. 't-,D•-in;.'' ,-141 ,,'I `Y.:•• •%,' . • \k''I';*'r.' "T'•c :r.eW- ,rock,,ci -i-ii.; ,.; !,,,, ., , -,3 F. 0o0 100.0 •!.q 4,',•••r)e.1.-`-‘ •'.:...,•'• '-'''' • .:-.. *-- - , `ii,•,;it.e..-r1 -• ••...,,, tr.• • .' e3.•2' ..P..,/./'...'0"a sv'••• •0 — .....0)'...,.!..!, V.,V,!‘s!i5...'',.... '‘\r.,•....r - -. ..rtz:,.-;,. t.")Jti'•••'. ,••oh.,.Vi...f.••:.;,..VC•i: ?.r,a-0...c: j:c....ia.c,.•.::,,..I.,.. .....e< .t o mi., ,11).„...),:„c.,,• ,,.'• ‘•Z,. '' ii'•. -•• r". ' •' ' iv—1,-•ri 0 0-re Rostre•-• t '' i:31." •"?., 1 41:-iir •'-1 zr:!•••c.f.•',..‘''':. r•t' 00. ..,..'.)-•-0,,,,..-•:',.‘„•,...,•.0...:,•;:o. :0 •••;•••••'..,-.*:-0 0:ei-1 ••• . ' . .. •••••••••,;....ro..„,•,,k,.,,....,•4..,..Fc i.:,--„.':,...,.-,,,,, ...,,,.- ,,•;--•••••,.,./, `i•,!;:',0;-,z.",- ; •..?,."...i•*,7.;%..:...•.' ,7-. ' s • ...`V.: c'ENy•h• •,r..r. • ' -.••••'••5•1'„ ,, ;•.-.7, 1.4..:,?%%!.1,5,'3•''.,•./'T;,I!v.,.-'..,,'6,,:..:-,i',%;..A.'.;..'..,.,,"-...`..'7.*1 2• Pc"..,-._--'-.e--;,-;.,-0-'-,,-•r••-r' e•;•.,r,,:'.'':(•:•l.;:,•fP::;•"fl';.•,.:,.•,.i.•i,1,'P''-'.,..'0.:4,,1',::.•''••`:Y,'1•:''.'•...'.e."'-'.1..:.••••:•••'"•.i."f'•iA,',e•.'1•%''.'•,(..-.;;.',••',(•!.:5•''''.''••'('‘•:.';•'•';.•,•'•,).•.•')i'',,'."i.•.':;••-,;.:••1):7`'.•1•1,::;:':;::;!/..,°•.;:,•:f•!:•::Z.',, '?1•)).i';.,.','•,.";,•••,;)•'.'••'. ( o•ls•.•-:(•)"(:e.1 00'-,t Nl'.•-•-,•-'-•1!)•,.•0,`•,".1e,"'r,...,..r..1••4-i':...::•--..'.'•,'4•-'- :',--••-o-..:...;'7..;..._.9 0.:....c,•;p..,'-,,,;--,c,!"..,e.yi.r r•'...'_••;-r,e•%.A11 3'. , - V l 11 : 1 74 "' . . -- ,:'..7S•.'•0r.SS'.':56•'.•',•,:i'•..4.".,.1.r.0P(3•.2'•,,,V•:.,1,-;-a.,0.:• .•F`..,.•k %•‘i.P rI, „ „(„ r.') •'!!•:2''' .' ?, I..,to..,:,,:.,I,v.,.„.C,.k.:.(n.. I bi • . .4%ej is,!evi•ef ::,•,. • ,..r., •.:0....;,1;4', • ,„ ., . .:„...,,..,..r., ,.,,..... ,, , „. . .: .:::;.,,,....„.......;.:. ,. ft :4.-17.7.,......,,4,1(4...,.,:o..,,,t,...64,..L,,...:(.:•;.,i4,1,:,..E.7(.1s.:::,,,,.,,!..t.,..ro:,....5,. ••:,,-,‘,, ,,,":.',:".',- . •f,' ,v,p,mn ....i.•:.''' '••• -....,•.c.,"•.'•?••::0,•-• • • "••••-•'•-•-•-, ,, , 000,11;lp s RC, :..•'''ce, '•,c.„,,,...„. ,,:iV:.' N',;',;', •,::. . `'.;',11, .k.",....,a ,, . .::',.t._L...„%•••••!),'?::;0"..•. .11/4‘. ...-•- • j•-?..i., A :\ , ii', -----------.. ... -;-:,:itt.tv,,{F.,,j.,,f.,. / :',ei:. --•..... ,4. . er4.•:• -----. 4:4•?_c'I: LAND USE ELEMENT .,&;,,,,,,,,,:,-.,,......„• ...,..,.,, .<,,,,...,....,,,,,,..!.... "1 ., , ,,, • .-,•..... b------- tIcTUF:i..•-----, ...•' •,- .}.: l .,., ...,',”.v..0• ' .9.n .•<,-..P'.,;.0:...,:>: .4t-tfo. '•t'•-•10?'.•• •.' '; •Ica:.•", .•,''• •. ...11r.4.1.L.‘X .. • ,,1 •'.•'''• .1V•V• ' ;•,,..,,"..• • Single Family 1111111 Commercial •&.,, ••,, • •u,4- i4,s,t3,i,,,,,,.., • $0 '', 1•:../.`.!•••,''' .',i,Vi. • • *-1,s q;,..•c,., 09"•,•"•• .4 .:)`..•-.,`41. ••••:•,;0:4'..!..;.,.:,...'•0 -..'t",1"'.'"t•li,l'I'' • Cl''''" ••c.-t./..k 1`.*taZi.0;•,,,. ..,: : , ,4.?... i,:;`,.-1-', ,,‘'...Q-1.-3:,•c...45.. • '4.7-.1V;', ..................... \ ''',i-i :,1.•:::41):;'v.„,. I _ o::::::::::::::: L w Density "Nzs,•••••(,•c•fi.,..,4.p.... .,., — oe••=,-.4ecz,,,,,k3,>;tv,,:• ----------- Office / Office Park -:c••:•,:.;-',--•••••; ‘.1,,,•-•;J;.'w`....;!!-•••°,:ii,:u.'.'• •••',1-%-m,....,i.....:0., ... •i::.:•:::.::.:::::.:•:::: Multmily .& , :: i..10,•,, ..,,,• ;,,- -;,.,•;-,,p;,,,.•:..,, ,•••:..•';',II t;'.,C.'0 -'•••0.,'.' :?,i..V.,,•.. , , ,6.•••••••••,••-0,- .‘"'L• '• ' •. ,ril,...•.7.41:3• , '0.;,:„,'13.:0:;..0;,,•, - /0000000 . 7 •.•:::::::::::::::••::::::•: Medium Density 0.0c...or . •-,..---..;,.•f.V•cea.., ........:.:.x.x....I.I.:- O'ci3oO°o°oc'oc'e Public/Quasi-Public •• A .............. Multi-Family ,....... s,k: ,Plf,'.1;!)61'. .............. 0000000( - 00 - .- 1.5%. ..5er'i:jri' t•'.:?..., i qi.. )0000*• -...,' 'I.1•••"? Si.V te. ..V. 0 0 00000*. .!n; rifORMS High Density ...,...0..c... ,... ....00.00.000 .. -,-4,1b,( 71 ;:,•...•.0.00.. ...:y;,,,,:„.'1,.... .,,.. • pimm.K.I:m Light Industrial ........_ %or • ...... , .. . Rimoisto: Multi-Family. .0...0 ..• 0, : ,. 00000.0 *00000. • *000 .. 0 0 ... • 00000 00r , •. , 000000000 : WilliiA.'16111.'' 43* ' . ,! C • . - if 41 L • CV,,i.,•:4,,: 447 Recreation 41.'/1 . 0 if • ••• • • • ; • • • Heavy Industrial •-__ e., ..c...,.....00d ..00..00 . 00. ., •00., •,..,, •... ........r.,... .. ... . . 0, oc .:N--1•.•c•ert:;02-', 1.' ..t. 4' •C• f§ 'eti;4,4c1,.* ' •;.y...:•1. . .111). , •' sti er ti, ,..4. I. ,...,-....,-,.., _____. .. •. Greenbelt -_---_-•=-1_----_-=-_---_ Manufacturing Park :::::: ' Mk iisini;:i.:::N . , . ......;i'.-c.'•.' • • . . 'it'-(.1 ,"` , f.'•'`,!'.Z CI%la'', / MUltinie OntiOn ::::::::II.I..... . . ,.. %::::::::*:*?. .7. • • . . 4111111.1111W .. . .., . • . • , . . ,...1",::::1t...i...i.t.::::1•.,;:.,, .-1.. .:,...,/,, . • ly..,,ler‘i\:\:::...ili......1i...-3,,:liviel.-:9,11-..ii:--4:,..,i3-,. .i• .. 1. . c.c.caLi.......r.i_LIIII:L•j.•I I-11-- '7'. -11-.1 • " . , . • , .., , 11:1411.1.111 1( I. ,_ rr:,_____......:_;.,..,..,,j...... ,....„.: ..,....! ,,I. ,I ..., 1, : • „i/I ---1, 1 ;.6. f, _. ,.. . ,..,,, . r It -.)t -is° , ,,,47-4-1 ills : -::* . !'!-!'PA:LC. 1:11'., 1,• . .'- ''I-Fir' 3s--11‘.71:17._'et., -171 ' ;1;1..1 11 0 t iliii•.,?_it " ."..)64)ti 124i oi •:: I • 'II '-''' I-. II ' I. --1- t ", . 1..r, • . •;- . ..,1.1 „ ,. ...„ 8i....• "1... ,, •• .-...;:.;.i.---:-;;;;) "-.J, 7. - • 1!._______',.,2 :-.i, 1 : ; (;:, ---, ) •.;;I;-.11.112_1; _: ---.V._ .i,.1-, •"!,/,,-11; t1. 1. his..: -1.;', .--__-y. r. -- ',...., • -i,-, .1.,- -, 3 -,..1; ;1.,-ri- - - 11 i- * • ' It if , --: - -.-,vi'1'111-0-,F.i-Fil- - ''• ' ' • _ - - - - ' -1 L'i-:-!2-•" " *°, 4' ''' _..L.__. 1 , --.•1 --...7:,-.-...10, 7.-:i. ▪ — ---5 III I•Iikt.1 V. Lk ' li / PI t ''.I' '• —- ' C I .. .. 1••• '. ....9.i: .....01"1:i 111•'[.f.: :---1 1, ; lb • . • i- 1. 1-,--, ,• ....: ,. .,•.:,i - _- _ ,,, r. L r.,. IL—BILK...Az' .4,. • ' * 1 '- - Li . 1 . . !, - ,.. , . *7- :1' 1:111-1.1 I- I 1'1 l'H 41 111 1 li 1 1•..\ •"1 . \R." -II ... .0.. i r.1 ot....1 ..1,•!,,'•77,..:.•' :;!.....1:„..,• '1.',_ ':. .,*, : ..., . ; .1, •1 LirlAr1171!id. °. 1-1.1.? •••I I'Lla-;c1..-Vi i 1 . !...,I ie....I*ft. *0! '10.1•0,...' In'b• '0.• • r- - . 1 . r I 0..,10. .. i.,• •••••.**.4.11',',.V1.*1:::::'... :-')M.:4.; .'li'.;.---- ---- •• - ::,- .._.....:',____.:!. ., •. 1 .j)..s.' •.. I II: . • _ , . .. . — ; 1;.' ..!; ; .:1.! 1 !- , ;_„;1',",Q.: (...•• ! .....— R 1 _ .... ., .. . . ,.„ , , , .. ,....,...„:., .., , , , ,. ._.. ..1, . . ., , ., .. . Arils 0 1._ ! .... ',' 7; • •. , C.: 1-•l'..' 9 'N • i thp.,Rps —LI ' ....11(1..1* -1-:'I ' li.;- ". *!...1.:1::.) i ;-.-- /„.:i- !I— ; . :' " 1.1.00:i- — L.._f , hotiE f DEIN . . ELEIAEMARY SCHOOL . —_,U11:11\121*.111:•1 ;11:,11,T1•., '• ''.: • L.,_ n • t -- -- ITIL____ . : 1 i -I • i_ :.. ...i. , . : . •,°,, = i i , i _ _ ....0 , 11:EI 1 . ., ri --- !, _____ .._ .1. . . I •: . 11 y.1..i.1 - r'..1 1-11- ''''. ..' '('-.- ". -'il ' ,,,:...1..1.11 , ,...„_ ,1 2. . • •__ , ,, ,,. , . , ,.., .. •, .1 .. 1 I •!. : , 1 - -7- : (• -I .:11. .11I ;-: Rd... , ri_ „• „ ,• , r I--; --1 ..„,,....-1,. ., —1 s.k . '• • .- , .-.; 2 I. ,..1 ' -..; - e,? 1 j•:! — — • I I ....—.1.i t...i.1_,.![!_r* 0 ( '1". • ,..--• • ; -;;- • **/ — " HI, 1.';" •...\''.). ...":- •; ; 1 •---". . -.1 1.1-A 11- 1 I 13-21-7— L. I I i • 1,-.:-.'741 . 1.1.1, . .... ' - ‘,- .• ' ;•: ; ; ; '-' ;-"-. ..-1 ( : • I 1,,,!,.t .1..,...,..,. .;\_.(., ..z..:,...-1 ; 11: .:,, ;' ; 11;;;--.- ....., „:11.11,- ..i.:• I" I-i- LI1J.;/_..11J-11_'. 11 . • . 1 I :1 •;:.ii:: : ...1-1 1;PI'i!,;2;'' ri !, / I _ 1... __‘__..,......I_____'_..*._1.... " . I 0_ ...,____. : z I.1../ • ' •! •‘ I 11•••••••;•-t-1 -i: 1 --I". 7t.'... .. .. .:. -. i 1111111111 1;1 ti 1114°II,. 1 1-1.I.II 11 I t)-11 i li 11;. Ili I.. • 1 , . .....I....li ... '. "• ' . .--- ;1 ' .1.I WO . it ..... L . ..11:1:111.n!' 1:I ";I 1.11...f * * ' ' • ' .L. 1 ;;; . . . i -.. 'J IL il vj i —I— : . _I _ ' .. • , , . • • .._ OAKWOOD HOMES/UNION PLACE ECF-091-88 , R-091-88 , PP-091-88 • , APPLICANT OAKWOOD HOMES , INC, TOTAL AREA 2 . 06 ACRES PRINCIPAL ACCESS UNION AVENUE N.E . EXISTING ZONING G-1 EXISTING USE SINGLE FAMILY ... PROPOSED USE SINGLE FAMILY SUBDIVISION, 10 LOTS • COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN SINGLE FAMILY COMMENTS LOCATED AT 763 UNION AVENUE N.R . • . . . . • • ALOE 2T BALCHS PLSIDENT•PLK NO. 4. • \ EI IKTri- - .� -V N 7ta.aY 0._ .. O.S�'ICI ..Ey' O L. 03 '--10.00 14 0 j! STO BASEMENT / g n z 4 7n I. P1 0 ' 4 71 TO b Rey. y O ; � ,Illp �. 0 , � Z / o IJ • 4i — 11 a _ _ a * O - --T1T.�P-1 U -I __ V T.sa a 4. ' (0, _. O 1-1 \\81 © /�a - ut HI .0_, \,,:, ., N e' e' o •,•Mom_ �S. — D,o KKK ,e- NAT R 13. b•M DRAIN - T C° — -- '--e SANITARY SEWER F J N.E. 132nd AVENUE . • • T. ri p' n n u,� h. r !;-'. Z N 111 1 ; S E- vvii1n,t a $ P.p vtl• S.E. it ITNI• r et Y 1q PROJ Ni ee-16E ' DATE �/e ON e REYIvS � DEMON dY.AID bkAN'N by.l C ' N e17NSUfTTNO ENOINEERMC SERVICES PRELIMINARY PLAT gam"^'"'en 71•6 in MI,M"'°• UNION PLACE 11•01 II.1E601 A R/b. ll14.R 01••.-14•1 CITY OF RENTON HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING AGENDA COMMENCING AT 9: 00 AM, JANUARY 24, 1989 COUNCIL CHAMBERS, SECOND FLOOR, RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING The application(s) listed are in order of application number only and not necessarily the order in which they will be heard. Items will be called for hearing at the discretion of the Hearing Examiner. OAKWOOD HOMES/UNION PLACE ECF; R; PP-091-88 Applicant seeks to rezone a 2 . 06 acre parcel from G-1, General Use, to R-1, Single-Family Residential Use, and to create a ten (10) lot preliminary plat. The property is located at 763 Union Avenue N.E. !., COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING January 24, 1989 APPLICANT: OAKWOOD HOMES, INC. FILE NUMBER: ECF; R; PP-091-88 LOCATION: 763 Union Ave. N.E. A. SUMMARY AND PURPOSE OF REQUEST: Applicant seeks to: 1) rezone a 2.06 acre parcel from G-1, General Use, to R-1, Single-Family Residential Use; and 2) to create a ten (10) lot preliminary plat for future single-family residential use. B. GENERAL INFORMATION: 1. Owner of Record: Oakwood Homes, Inc. 2. Applicant: Oakwood Homes, Inc. 3 . Existing Zoning: General Use Zone (G-1) 4 . Existing Zoning in the Area: General Use Zone (G- 1) ; Single-Family Residential Zone (R- 1) . 5. Comprehensive Land Use Plan: Single-Family Residential 6. Size of Property: 2 . 06 acres 7 . Access: Union Avenue N.E. 8. Land Use: Undeveloped land 9. Neighborhood Characteristics: North: Single-Family Residential; Public Use (Kiwanis Park) . East: Single-Family Residential; Public Use (Honey Dew Elementary School) . South: Single-Family Residential. West: Single-Family Residential. C. HISTORICAL/BACKGROUND: Action File Ordinance Date Located within the -. - original City bound- aries. N/A N/A N/A PRELIMINARY REPORT TO E HEARING EXAMINER Union` Place/Oakwood Hc___ s January 24, 1989 c Page 2 D. PUBLIC SERVICES: 1. Utilities a. Water: Property is served by a six-inch line connecting with the 12-inch main running along Union Ave. N.E. b. Sewer: Eight-inch line runs south along Union Ave. N.E. to the Honey Dew Lift Station located near the southeast corner of the property. c. Storm Water Drainage: A 15-inch pipe runs south along Union Ave. N.E. , eventually draining into Maplewood Creek. 2 . Fire Protection: Provided by the City of Renton as per ordinance requirements. 3 . Transit: Metro bus lines 107 and 108 provide service to a bus stop near N.E. Seventh Street on Union Ave. N.E. 4 . Schools: a. Elementary Schools: Honey Dew Elementary is approximately 200 feet northeast of the project site. (This school is closed for this academic year; if it does not re-open next year, students will continue to attend Highlands Elementary School which is approximately 3/4 mile due west of the subject site. ) b. Middle Schools: McKnight Middle School is approximately 1. 5 miles northwest of the project site. c. High Schools: Renton High School is approximately 2.5 miles southwest of the project site. 5. Recreation: Kiwanis Park is approximately 200 feet north of the project site.. E. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE ZONING CODE: 1. Section 4-704, General Use (G-1) 2 . Section 4-706, Single-Family Residential Zone (R-1) . 3 . Section 4-3014 (C) Reclassification 4 . Section 9-1101 -1114, Renton Subdivision Code F. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR OTHER OFFICIAL CITY DOCUMENT: 1. Northeast Renton Plan, City of Renton Comprehensive Plan Compendium, 1986 (pgs. 55-60) . 2 . Residential Goal, Objectives and Policies, City of Renton Comprehensive Plan Compendium, 1986 (pgs. 14- 16) . PRELIMINARY REPORT TO ""'E HEARING EXAMINER• Union' Place/Oakwood He s January 24, 1989 . Page 3 ga �*r G. DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS: 1. The applicant, Oakwood Homes, Inc. , seeks approval for: 1) a non-project, programmatic rezone of 2 . 06 acres from G-1, General Use, to R-1, Single-Family Residential Use; and 2) creation of a ten (10) lot preliminary plat. The property is now zoned for G-1 use, which permits single-family residences on parcels which are no smaller than 35,000 square feet. The applicant seeks the rezone and subdivision,, in order to facilitate future single-family residential development which complements other residential development in this area and which can be supported by existing public and private improvements. This property is presently developed with one single-family residence and accessory structures. These structures are uninhabited, in extremely poor repair and are slated for demolition by the applicant. 2 . Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and SEPA (RCW 43 .21(c) , 1971, as amended) , the Environmental Review Committee issued a Determination of Non-Significance - Mitigated on November 30, 1988, with the following conditions: a. That the applicant provide trip assessment fees of $2 .37 per AWDTE for off-site improvements, as well as on-site improvements to ensure safety and efficiency of access, subject to .TBID requirements and approval by the Traffic Engineering Division. ►b. That the applicant provide a tree inventory and a tree preservation plan, for the site, subject to approval by the City's landscape planner. c. That the applicant provide a site plan for on- site landscaping and screening to mitigate noise, light and glare to and possibly from adjacent properties. - - d. That the applicant provide a storm drainage improvement plan to mitigate against flooding and erosion subject to approval by the Public Works Department. The Environmental Review Committee encouraged the applicant to contribute funds to improve the City's public recreation spaces in lieu of providing on- site recreational improvements. It was suggested'; that the applicant meet with Parks and Recreation staff to discuss these matters. The applicant wa also advised of the need to provide for on-site and off-site public improvements (e.g. utility service lines, street lighting) subject to approval by the Public Works Department. REZONE APPLICATION 3 . Section 4-3014 (C, 1) lists three criteria that the Hearing Examiner is asked to consider along with all other relevant information in making a decision on a rezone application. PRELIMINARY REPORT TO E HEARING EXAMINER Union' Place/Oakwood He s January 24, 1989 Page 4 a. That substantial evidence was presented demonstrating the subject reclassification appears not to have been specifically considered at the time of the last area land uses analysis and area zoning. The subject property was a part of the original Renton township. The property has also been extremely stable with respect to development and use since its original incorporation into the City of Renton. The single-family residential zoning (G-1, General Use) was established in 1953, at the time the City implemented its initial zoning plan. Land use action has been confined to construction and maintenance of the residential unit and accessory structures now existing on the property. There is no information which indicates that the subject property has been specifically evaluated since a local land use analysis in 1959. b. That the property is potentially classified for the proposed zone being requested pursuant to the policies set forth in the Comprehensive Plan and conditions have been met which would indicate the change is appropriate. The subject property is designated for single- family residential use (G-1 or R-1) in the Comprehensive Plan. The proposed rezone would be consistent with Plan goals, objectives and policies for residential development (Section IV) , including, but not limited to: 1) the encouragement of suitable housing and living environments; 2) the creation of sound, viable neighborhoods (based upon available space, available service/infrastructure and affordable housing units) ; and 3) the provision of housing alternatives. In general, there has been increased development in the area -- this northeast section of Renton is the fastest growing area in the City, including a variety of types and sizes of residential, public and commercial uses. Single-family zoning and development continues to predominate around the site and in the general 'vicinity. Given the present and likely future substantial need for housing in this sector, a rezone to R-1, which is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and which would allow a greater density of development than would be permitted in the G-1 zone, appears t4 be reasonable. c. That since the last previous land use analysis of the area zoning of the subject property, authorized public improvements, permitted private development or other circumstances affecting the subject property have undergone significant and material change. Public utilities, street improvements and public services (e.g. electricity, telephones, fire service, police service, water mains, sewer lines, storm drainage , PRELIMINARY REPORT TO 7(E HEARING EXAMINER Union Place/Oakwood H-_ ls January 24, 1989 Page 5 systems, schools and recreational developments) are presently adequate to serve this site, with maximum single-family residential development, and to serve other developments presently located in the area. The City is implementing plans for additional improvements to accommodate anticipated growth. The applicant will be required to provide selected improvements (e.g. on-site storm water drainage) and may be required to participate in other improvement projects (e.g. street lighting, signalization, signage) at the time of development. d. The final test to determine whether a rezone is appropriate is to address the question of timeliness. Is it appropriate to rezone the subject property at this time? The proposed rezone is considered to be timely for the following reasons: 1) The subject property is located in an area which is developed primarily with single- family residential uses and in which there is a market for additional single-family and multi-family residential developments to serve the growing number of persons interested in housing in the Northeast Section of Renton. Based upon surrounding uses and residential development goals, the proposed action is characterized as an "infill" rezone. Single-family residential developments predominate in the immediate neighborhood; a variety of multi-family residential developments and commercial developments exist in the general vicinity. The subject property is located within 200 feet of Kiwanis Park and across the street from Honeydew Elementary School. There are, however, some parcels of land in the immediate vicinity that are zoned for single-family or multi-family residential use which are not presently developed. Three nearby vacant properties are slated for residential development ( two single-family projects and one 25-unit apartment complex) . 2) Existing public services and improvements are available to serve the property (See Section G, c, 3 above) . 3) The proposed non-project, programmatic reclassification would allow implementation of a future plan for placing up to ten (10) single-family homes on this site, as permitted under the Comprehensive Plan and the Zoning Ordinance. e. Representatives of City departments have been generally accepting of the application to rezone the subject property. The Public Works Department, Long-Range Planning and PRELIMINARY REPORT TO iE HEARING EXAMINER 'Union Place/Oakwood H as January 24, 1989 Page 6 Fire Prevention Bureau have recommended that the applicants enter into agreements with the City, predicated on the number, type and location of structures, to participate in improvements to utilities, roadways, and public services, as deemed necessary and appropriate by the City, in order to ensure adequate services to the site and the surrounding community. Also, staff may establish other specific mitigation measures determined to be suitable in conjunction with the proposed preliminary plat or future residential development. PRELIMINARY PLAT 4. Chapter 11, Renton Subdivision Code lists several criteria that the Hearing Examiner is asked to consider along with all other relevant information in making a decision on a preliminary plat application: a. Compliance with the Comprehensive Plan Designation As noted in discussion of the rezone application (Section G 3 ,b above) the subject site is designated for Single-Family development on the Comprehensive Plan Map. The purpose of the proposed plat is to allow the future development of up to ten (10) single-family residences on a 2 . 06 acre site; therefore, the plat complies with the requirements of this designation. b. Compliance with the underlying zoning designation: As noted in discussion °of the rezone application (Section G 3, a above) the subject site received the zoning designation of G-1 in 1953 when the City's initial Zoning Ordinance was adopted. No changes in zoning of the property have taken place since then, however, the applicant is seeking a rezone of the property to R-1, Single-Family Residential Use, in conjunction with this preliminary plat application. Section 4-706 of the Zoning Ordinance, the R-1 zoning category, requires that lots be a minimum of 7200 square feet with setbacks of 25 feet for the rear yard, 20 feet for the front yard, five (5) feet for interior lot side yards, and 20 feet for corner lot side yards (street side) . This zoning category also requires that the lots be a minimum of 60 feet in width and 85 feet in depth. The proposed lots are designed to meet or exceed these platting and zoning requirements c. Compliance with subdivision regulations: 1. Streets The applicant has developed a plan to provide. access to the property which includes utilization of Union Avenue, an adjacent public roadway defined as a minor arterial, and construction of a roadway on the site. The proposed new roadway conforms to requirements PRELIMINARY REPORT TO. --1E HEARING EXAMINER Union Place/Oakwood H!' as January 24, 1989 Page 7 established in Chapter 9-1108, Section 7, with respect to size, configuration, grade, relationship to the adjacent arterial, intersection, and design of the residential cul- de-sac. 2. Blocks The proposed plat satisfies requirements for dimension and design as established in the Renton Subdivision Code Section 9-1108 (23) (E) . The specific design characteristics of the plat are described above in Section G. 4. e of this report. 3 . Lots The plat as designed essentially complies with the requirements of Section 9-1108 (23) (F) of the Subdivision Code, as established for residential lots, with respect to arrangement of lot lines (perpendicular to the roadway) , as well as size, shape and orientation of both interior and corner lots. d. Reasonableness oflproposed boundaries The boundaries of the proposed plat are reasonable and the future development of the plat is not expected to result in any direct adverse impacts to surrounding properties. (See third paragraph in this section for a discussion of indirect impacts) . Lots have been designed to address: 1) the terrain/topography of the parcels, 2) location of the parcels vis a vis neighboring parcels, 3) compatibility of layouts for adjoining lots, 4) the availability of public services and infrastructure, and 5) compatibility of the proposed subdivision parameters/future use plans with the configuration and uses of nearby properties. Staff notes that there is potential for indirect adverse impact from the proposed preliminary plat to the property which lies immediately due north of the subject parcel (addressed at '8.01 Union Avenue N.E. and under the ownership of Phil Barber) : That property is currently developed with an occupied single-family residence. The configuration of that property is such that future subdivision/development may be restricted by the design/configuration of the proposed Union Place/Oakwood Homes preliminary plat. The proposed Union Place plat is so structured as to limit access options for the property to the north of the subject parcel, if that property is eventually rezoned and/or subdivided. (Note: Staff instructed the applicant to inform Mr. Barber of the proposed preliminary plat and to endeavor to work out an agreement to provide Mr. Barber access to his property through the Union Place Plat, if Mr. Barber required such access for planned future development of his property. Staff has been PRELIMINARY REPORT TC iE HEARING EXAMINER Union Place/Oakwood H as January 24, 1989 Page 8 notified that: 1) Mr. Barber has been duly informed of the pending Union Place preliminary plat action; 2) Mr. Barber has expressed an interest in the development of the Union Place Plat; 3) Mr. Barber has no immediate plans for subdivision of his own property; 4) the applicant and Mr. Barber have not come to an agreement concerning access through the Union Place Plat to 801 Union Avenue N.E. Staff did not require the applicant to provide access to the property at 801 Union Avenue through the proposed preliminary plat because Mr. Barber has not indicated any plan to subdivide his property in the foreseeable future. Staff did not consider it to be reasonable to recommend that the applicant provide such an access without a development plan for that site, or for an unlimited period of time, pending the development of such a plan. e. Timeliness This criterion requires that staff assess whether or not the proposed platting action is anticipated to create a significant impact upon the City's development goals, public services or infrastructure. 1) Development Goals The proposed plat is appropriate for consideration at this time since the subdivision as designed is an "infill" single-family residential development project planned to be located in a neighborhood developed with single-family uses. The site is proposed to be used for a maximum of ten (10) single-family homes, adding approximately 26 persons (2 .59 persons x 10 dwelling units) to this section of the City. The parcel is currently developed only with a single- family residence and accessory structures which are substantially deteriorated and unusable. The subject property is surrounded on four sides by single-family development. G-1 zoning exists on the property to the south, west and north of the site; R-1 zoning exists on the property to the east of the site. The neighborhood as a whole is generally developed with single-family residences; some parcels which are zoned for single,- family use remain vacant. 2) Public Services and Infrastructure As noted in the discussion of assessment of this project by the Environmental Review Committee (Section [G] [2] ) and in presentation of the rezone application (Section [G] [3] [c] and [G] [3] [d] ) the subject property is now served and/or can be improved so that it is adequately served by the City's public services and infrastructure systems. PRELIMINARY REPORT TO [E HEARING EXAMINER 'Union Place/Oakwood H :s January 24, 1989 Page 9 The Environmental Review Committee determined that this plat would not create a burden to service or infrastructure. Roads, water and sewer lines, and other utilities are readily available to the site. Storm drainage management systems will need to be designed to address the terrain and to take into consideration adjacent properties. Local commercial services are available in the Highlands area. Recreational opportunities are available at Kiwanis Park, located approximately 200 feet to the north. Similarly, ERC determined that fire services and police services are available to the site, and that these resources are sufficient to serve the planned single-family residences. Full development of the plat will result in approximately 100 new vehicle trips per day (based upon 10 trips/dwelling unit x ten units - ITE Trip Generation Manual) to adjacent roadways. Traffic Engineering reported to the ERC that the anticipated type and level of increase in vehicular traffic generated by residents is expected to be consistent with the traffic generated by surrounding residential uses and can be accommodated safely and efficiently in this area, based upon the above- described circulation plan and the above- required traffic mitigation measures. Representatives of the local school district reported to the ERC that the three students (based on 0. 25 students/dwelling unit x ten dwelling units) anticipated to be added to the school system at full development of the plat can be accommodated without adverse impact. (Note: In fact, Honeydew Elementary School, located immediately to the east of the site is now not used because there are too few students -- it can be reopened if future needs so mandate. In the interim, students may attend Highlands Elementary School which is located approximately 3/4 mile to the west of the site. ) In sum, any burden upon services or infrastructure can be mitigated by the applicant through compliance with code requirements, with environmental conditions (delineated in Section [G] [2] of this report) , and with land use conditions recommended in this report. Plans for such compliance are subject to approval by the Public Works Department, Fire Prevention Bureau, Building Department, and other City t departments, as appropriate. H. DEPARTMENTAL RECOMMENDATION: Based upon the above analysis, it is recommended that the Hearing Examiner: 1. Recommend to the City Council approval of the proposed rezone File # R-091-88) ; PRELIMINARY REPORT TO - 1E HEARING EXAMINER Union Place/Oakwood H as January 24 , 1989 Page 10 2 . Determine in favor of the proposed Union Place Preliminary Plat (PP 091-88) , a ten (10) lot residential plat, planned for future development with single-family homes, subject to the following conditions: a. That the applicant shall comply with conditions established by the Environmental Review Committee on November 30, 1988; • • T111•��,�r 1 ,1• --- ,• (i . I 1 11 _v. -- ( ,vp1 , .�1-1 ✓ r -�7 111��IE� LI�.' 1"''• Ill1II' 1.-I'!_, 111' ') . 11(•,, -••,1t �1▪ 11t ,y' ,•.. TI1I .1 rl\\\_:••• •, --1 .et 1� .- (_, r 1' 1' I• II'.: I)• " 1 . '6 ,Li4 C ) i Itlis .1. - a-' . • • r -.j r�t 1 1 R,/ r 1 i' , I1' I '\` "1 — i" •IR "l';19 t; ; -4I s t •r•. ; " .1 •f 1: ._I...l l.'EiTt ;,, _.I .�. .I�I 1�.'l.'_lo '-+: t - I! •1,c, ..111 II l'1•"1 ..l';� -•; 1 I., I,t '. :'� —I— _ — — .__ ; ��.. !1_ I__-1 I,"[. I :1�1 i -L-I 1 I ' .•1. . .�-':'' ~ r:,• �.:.] _.1. /,,,., 5 r .. �L. 1 I{. ... . • . r r I.', 1. .1 ,� 1 r � I L t L�L'I. II'I_I_'I'l-1'� rl. 1 •Ir • 1 �. . 1. 'I 1 �� —lllr�yl .>;• ..' ( .1' ,I ICI I_I III -I ilI I1 I ,:I,� I,,,, ,;�'f:,,;.•. ".. LiIId It IsI!I.I• �I-f.1:-., '1 �:�11��'�_' 11•) I •I h'.il .ri , :t Vile::. /e,' 1•';•'' f t n xr c ,I rl I.... .1: .r,lil.}.i,r!1:t': ,� 't': 11 • r, 1, �' •t j . ;. 1`I IY,t- — , , hpllE r DE W t � -, t -��!I�'-Ij�'y� 'I:Ill ' IA 11 • —. _411".felv_____ . i•f'�•;•�, •�•I!� I, ; ;1 �.• i ._' T R'T 1 Icii:LEI�EIIIARY SCHOOL 1 ' irt:m7f I 1 : !.;:i‘r- 11 .;- I• ,, ;. , I A , ; ., .1. , �\S , •1 t).11.41,11:, R ~mea \ . 1 ,; ( 1 I1- 1 ] 1i. 1- I,rx.I1.1 ' \\,�. ' ' '; ._ L Li -n _ I\' i• .'1 .1. r lilt; ith _ r__ II . t I, -, H 11 11 I_ -3 .. ..._-_t R 1 i • OAKWOOD-HOMES/UNION PLACE ECF-091-88 , R-091-88 , PP-091-88 • APPLICANT OAKWOOD HOMES , INC. TOTAL AREA 2 . 06 ACRES • PRINCIPAL ACCESS UNION AVENUE N.E . EXISTING ZONING G-1 EXISTING USE SINGLE FAMILY PROPOSED USE SINGLE FAMILY SUBDIVISION, 10 LOTS COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN SINGLE FAMILY COMMENTS LOCATED AT 763 UNION AVENUE N.E. • '.:,,,, !, .:.;;: 2_./ •-•!- ,.: S.Gale 1 =2000 ✓. , • ,tom 1 000000000c 1 -:: 000000000 17- • 000000000• is,. • • , ei • 1,-. M1r ^ • ..r .. .. ... 1 . ,.., .. .,.....,.., •"..„.„ . .. ..... .... ., .1 ,,..,, _ ,_• _. 1 . ••• 0; 1 •.i.•.•.f• i3 1 o�� :i..:. ■ UO N, 7::::\;., : f. L2oO;)I*trJiiitli ,, •k • aooa�o 1 .)000000[o • .00000 � KAI III II �II �4 it ChM 1 1%°00%% W'+p 1••S•'.. f ro • • to . — • gli" I . M k . 1 • • • •. .. .—•_ -. oo.. i �• • •_..„ , f 1 • • •.':•f• { :r II f�`•r ,0000000Ooo�T •„ • •• 00 ' ) 0oovoo0000 cu ( •0000000000 • • tTr o1 • • it • .• • • r(' . •ia IIa . � : : ' : _• • ♦ • II • • • • •' ' . '111)- :•:•:•:- • o•0( • \ • .:., 7::. .5,171111.10r..or Mil:Hilt .� ((,• oo▪ ao( 1 III41111 • J4 0*IV!: 'if) �• :'i) o0000ecil i 0000• v0000oov• �> 0 0, on,00000000of of oo (0ov 0 v ov(v0000o00ov,o( 000o v I, C 1 000)0 (1 )0 0000000 0 .i' O ( O F 00 F fl f 000000f 00(0000 O O) ,000000000 ['(,000OOOOf • • ,,, ,,,,,, •, .... ( f ov f r •o o00o000 A,o) 000 f • i)UOtf0000001 oo oo ovovv 00 I'•'' �O r • (Oil tt•(i ,0vv0v00v00000v0o000. '•O 4( 0 (100v0000000000000 s' �,: r,ouo oo000n0000v00000000 . ,0„0f1( 00000)0000000000000( •, �.�.' q o0nvo 00000000(;0000000000 I. : :: 'n� II . .F, �, 0000f i, „O.n.o... : • .•.•.•.,'., •(p 0000 000 !..,.! •• 00000000 d, • ':, :000°.OOOOO000• •���p�y�p� {yCS%( l7 i, •0000000▪ > moo p •��'•'ifJ • .,•rt'j !Si �' ). ," ar, •�7�h% ,•.,:'.,c� .t:".,••';f'.Y•'+'•- 'El.' i',1,'I•::.: `.! •'' rr,..',', J. 's•'•i�• 'i. ••')'r;,c:�^Y' ' ;100 5 r, ii::6,-C� "+ 'r;'•? [I,,'?r�,•,.;, r'S' Ji•-r i';- ;J�:•12 .'q, r'i ;. i \- ;,*.v,:",:::...,;•.„`,;.',,?k,".,.:,,•zs,vc,.'c..,..?-,,,e !..;.5;::x,'';'''t,-',,'im',I -t"liki'mt'::":':-.'Y(.;•;;i:.?.•r:i:,,:T,.. .Fr. II'_:`ram/. c(. ;,,..1,:;,i,, . , . , .•:,:‘.,....k....,, $G s • _ 41r _, . , . .._„.„.......„...,•,...„.r...... „el,. ...eiy•••••••,.":.,,...„...........„....... .........._, _,Iiiito r.010r ..,:,:.w.,.vr, ,, 4 k., ,'S.,,,•.,... • ,•! •7y`.r' .'••,r, 1,';:is;!`l •,,:, .'I I•*1: , C t!+r p•�''( ri:l'. j1;i, :i.•,O' 1.••'•'01': . 1'•'.• •.+ -•. • �'f*.. `.ErC%• r,Y. r - �--� 00000 1.!,(f;: .1l'r.,c)')7.`,\:.; O>' ,•, ^R�: ,t r•.F)•'• �'a v••-, )p. ,^ yr oi0 0 i,,i1. e•,,v,!,y!i'1.,. ..`. t., t,!) r:;t ,•.')' 1.•• �fi.1TY Y.I',?+ , ,; r,G'•L4•R..•, '•,� — '1' 00, }• ,. . ,.y •. i'r. ,.('� R (t• ,fir c,�Y�' lSj� ,tSl:..:t. ' f:f.•,'; —�,• 00 0(,f l5', >..(„SI . .' rtn� r.. t• ��.•• t,'..:;S�• .i �� J't^+'•a.' t,tfi,L1 O, • ',(ii,•f,•t7: ,.J•;��.Sc•.:lT:;,;I.. ,p. •i'.'iT.. 1.i', t�(.U, f1`� •;.. • r''7:r :0r,. ,•.,o J :�;• p 7E!':6f�.:rtr.f' _. t.• ,,: :•¢• '(t :f .,i,.,.. ;-� .,';•,'• •0i.;�',(,;,i.,F::'., a• (r.e • 'ar "f':t� • )• ;,P..fp+•-+''• •''!')'-.i[rb.:,:,�'.}•,1+f:9'1'.' :'65. •::• •.'". •,''''' ,.,. • 1 ,0o0v00 ( r :• opii, .f. • a " )r t Alt ,.C. (�. r^f o I.'C • .Lob ::oof r:. . (ooi, f•\ :i ••,,,• ••.\ t, ? • _ere t.7,... •�(•r'wr:•�'t f�� i.r 0f, O()O• •::.•� '1' JI'}S YY ( t_„ ..• .E,iC,w547: �L,_..: �. • [>"•',I.?, a ;;: c, `. LAND USE ELEMENT. t,r,E}.�;g, : .;: _ ::f :i 1.f"'rrtl t,}' r; ,e; ` ,n ,^'L(S•,.:4.. ._ t •h ` Single Family11111111 �h >: ,•. Commercial • ` 's`m ; .1 Low '•(('1�y)••n°ri).,c O. _ ,, __ '}• ) tU4,'•�`').„' .. _. .__..`_. Density ,+ y [ .J, `rn;rni A'': ) .>,� 'L3'rr ,Y'i),,€j ,•,li Office / Office Park �ti..4:�: .a�'•; �‘ ,',. • �.,_':H��,;(j;,,t��. .,�: lie Multi-Family ,h. • ` ° .,f S ,- o• l ,1.t ,•••• e>(:f LS �v iS1ly r•: i c,, t.j fir• .' 'I+'( . )t i)l, •cC)1 >. - •'�i. r:or?a." .(,..t?•4'. .•°(,'�;e7:�lf)( ' t):fj°�t3�(!D°t!'rG: V Medium Density .; yN,f,,-,,,- Multl-Family °°° Public/Quasi-Public 1 t t) ,0000000 � Wit); .°:'�• t>ji_:+. 00000oOc O0 a••`i.,v./.,,•,l.. '1, u I:,vi,,i.+ 00000000• tl• -l. •i•,,,JStSV£,,(f U.l. _ JOOo0o00000 + q%.,'„$. o00000000000S •••,."•t•• r,, ,.� High Density �`• �' �o�0000a00000 •'000. '•ff cr;.o;:{,''.,�ryr•, o0000000 ooc o000 ••�) ,; oc ? :. Light Industrial • ,:« Multi-Family o0000ooL l: 000000 . 0.o e00000 00000 00, .,. 000000000 . 00000000ot, i 7i:e°2:: i i • o°OOOOOOOOOCC• Vibil -� .: Recreation '.'.'. °oo[ .�, ��. Heavy Industrial .. % " tf f'Wy".'" Greenbelt -_-= . Manufacturing Park m''•.:: �` ' . •'•e •'ie< r:• G:S,`r _-_- / Multiple.' Option :..... .... - E ` 'l} r rt r f CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST NO. : ECF-091-88 APPLICATION NO(S) : R; PP-091-88 PROPONENT: Oakwood Homes, Inc./Steve Lusa DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Applicant seeks to rezone a 2.06 acre parcel from G-1, General Use, to R-1, Single-Family Residential Use, and to create a ten (10) lot preliminary plat. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 763 Union Avenue N.E. LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton Community Development Department Planning Division The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43 . 21C. 030 (2) (c) . Conditions were imposed as mitigation measures by the Environmental Review Committee under their authority of Section 4-2822 (D) Renton Municipal Code (see attached sheet) . These conditions are necessary to mitigate environmental impacts identified during. the environmental review process. This DNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340(2) . Because mitigation measures have been imposed, the lead agency will not act on this proposal for fifteen (15) days from December 5, 1988. Any interested party may submit written comments which must be submitted by 5:00 p.m. , December 20, 1988 , in order to be considered. A fourteen (14) day appeal period will commence following the finalization of the DNS. Responsible Official: Environmental Review Committee c/o Don Erickson, Zoning Administrator Planning Division Community Development Department 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 PUBLICATION DATE: December 5, 1988 DATE OF DECISION: November 30, 1988 SIGNATURES: Rdnald G. Nelson a r nger Building off b 9 ia annin anage 1. 4117 flten 14 Acting De ubli-c—W rks Director DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED MITIGATION MEASURES PROJECT: Oakwood Homes/Union Place - ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST: ECF-091-88 APPLICATION NUMBER: R;• PP-091-88 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Applicant seeks to rezone a 2.06 acre parcel from G-1, General Use, to R-1, Single-Family 'Residential Use, and to create a ten (10) lot preliminary plat. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 763 Union Avenue N.E. RECOMMENDATIONS: • Issue a Determination of Non- Significance-Mitigated with the following conditions: 1. That the applicant provide trip assessment fees of $2.37 per AWDTE for off-site improvements, as well as on-site improvements to ensure safety and efficiency of access, subject to TBID requirements and approval by the Traffic Engineering Division. 2 . That the applicant provide a tree inventory and a tree preservation plan, for the bite, subject to approval by the City's landscape planner. 3 . That the applicant provide a site plan for on-site landscaping ands screening to mitigate noise, light and glare to and possibly from adjacent properties. 4 . That the applicant provide a storm drainage improvement plan to mitigate against flooding and erosion subject to approval by the Public Works Department. In addition to the above, the applicant is encouraged to contribute to funds to improve the City' s public recreation spaces in lieu of providing on-site recreational improvements. The applicant should meet with Parks and Recreation staff to discuss these. The applicant is also advised of the need to provide for on-site and off-site improvements (e.g. utility service lines, street lighting) subject to approval by the Public Works Department. mmdoc . L'i�/.u1.111L111 ,_13Y J� UU P.M. UN ... _• _�� vl 111E �.u1111U1411Y REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: l LD APPROVED Y APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED 61-'S =1J ci! 1 0-)A SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE DATE � (�, REV. .6/88 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: fl[Cum_ v APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED NATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE DATE /L/�� REV. 6/88 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: Cmi planrkkei APPROVED X APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS. NOT,IAPPROVED Z.[v.fL "27,— DATI/Q F SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTfloP T.OR AUTflOPT7Pn Ai:DDL`aE'Mmamrn .1...,.1. -LILL t1u111i4ii4 i "' VISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT' DEPARTMENT 5: 00 P.M. ON i REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: Tr4441,L APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS K NOT APPROVED I. g / -2t 1ffc /,,•,e,( S I t4 rs re,01`ek ")e79„, n ... 2, I I '. 1; ylf f 0,1 f c-c ofr 112.Z‘) fee- 36 e e-d-J rik(' 4,)1 it I e eale-a-ed c-- . © r Iv n r 1 f 3• Provl4_ Sl1-r4 f JJ t ' f 1 5,P d evt/r.'7fn/F. /: de yds." e 6.e16 t)• t cd✓r'/- J p r , , , r t,a 1.. 'f.. YcovI e 511, :1•J" 4 cxtf 4 ;. . A,,,47_, „ /.7 e, DATE SIGNATURE ( F V CTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE �/ /y �� ll REV. 6/88 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS X NOT APPROVED , /e /1..eii ,a, legal -.6 a. __eici ..e, 66:6,:gi or.,_. 64-piKaf rita-6‘ - -;-tit6L-24-'-`'-'4 C+/` 1./% ��� �..( ' V ._, ,a„,,,.7,7,„,,,„,,,_7_,..,_ 1/ .37(/11e17-,- al.E4 tyl.-2.ezyr-i/ v__ ___, ,,.... a„,i7,,,,,,,,), ... ,,,,,‘„e„, _): (irt&(/ - ae,iie-4,,..- 642e-:,,,2-0‘ e--------t., ihr#,',e,__ _ ,- ,. .-,4e' (z2t/-2,-7__ yl,1&-" '4 7,640 ,1Z 6X# ,e . / .0.41A •7 ;2_ rite .,17>,ertel, -4 - _. )eDATE / -- —s� '5 ' SI NATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE !� REV. 6/88 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: �j' •-f. /rG GEC 71 Qh APPROVED 5 APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS Hai APPROVED 1; ' Sl5qelreffiel 4611-//e Ai 'L.A.eN: 74/4-00.N... i4.11efiri:11454041"0"., rJ,.L T ideA_ flue/ a,-- ENGINEERING :VISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION k FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU ' POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION • PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: irc_ fireuesvilm APPROVED v APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED Any development and/or construction shall comply with current Fire and Building Codes and Ordi- nances. A second means of approved access is required. Fire Department access roads/lanes shall be paved minimum width 20'; minimum height 13' 6". Yes No Preliminary fire flow calculations show-a fire flow of / Q .44.4,4 ,.;Q„-,a..-4,"... ,,,,i, is irequired. / hydrants with a minimuf-n flow of low-0 gpm each s required. �17.-0-vc,., ._ - " y sot, , Primary hydrant is required to be within feet of the structure. Secondary hydrants are required to be within 4 fe structure. � et of the An approved automatic sprinkler system is required to protect the total structure. Yes.. No i! All fire department access roads are to be paved and installed prior to construction. Yes '-! No _ All fire hydrants are required to be installed and approved prior to construction. Yes No41,4 „ 4''— DATE 7ov, af, /9I/ , SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 6/88 RE ,IEWI DEP TMENT/DIVISION: r/L/T rile-- _ �, y APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED , .&o1..E bA/ e f 2305'- /07 s- Pi COMERS iitifiETi 7 -1, 3 i y4s- 1,iy- SS //./FVG X '27??9' 4 '4. y�'4 _ Oc' Si r LATE CRIEnS AOREEA111 r _ ivp_ e SYSTEM DEVELOTITEHI G:;'. ' .! fs' " /o tel i. ,,,/04Z/0,61.4 =. I SYSTEM DEVELOPFI[t:T r, :.1 laxoo SPECIAL ASSfss'IE;T f. ...7.2. -I.7. Z smint Assrasrm:I I:: _s:._i �o 1!!'rnov(O WATER t'IJrJ !"TTI ESEINER ULU! 11.11.101. APt'i+GiIED FIRS NYUR,1I;i.;_ i:(li{C;'i BY riCE '"T E �r - 1;,, ,y::i • NM I SIGNATURE O. DIRECTOR OR AUTH OR REPRESENTATIVE DATE /— Or 4 • \ ALBF 2T BALMS PPESIDENT•P1RK NO. 4 • lop..C.13‘ . \ 1 ;I 0 0 ' 0.54. 6 J N r - 1_..) m J kr - 0 —t mto.00SYO .ASEMCNT 1 jg 2 _ `\ N ; , 1 En Cr I 2 0 2 ii 1 g x , . -j41 I JL •. i a . a z TTrov - — �_ T� O J P. z J y J. e . I S N �' fTl 1. _ , r . S .� \ -II I.U.t r-i- �T7r—- I I L.1Y t 1 J —I - s s 0 . .. .1 .- __dC7!_wdR sr�—SCORN DRAM �,A n.5a 7.JM— _ _ •• wT -------ems . t4 _ 7.° 1.ANITARY SCME11 �— I. '1-'1-R'X1C1l- EX. CURB—.� tM M t .k N.E. 132nd AVENUE • a n n 4 PI • o. - / 1 . 7Cp0°FA 1 ' Z bk ZSN~ / V � J 3 ; I �" P n A MI, 5 ; toga 2 T 2 it UM. s tR N a q PRw NO ee-2E1 DAYS ep/ee R VIVOtiS ^ ' N DESIGN t8Y J1.10 bRANN by.MC I.\ 1 _� coN7UCiMe ErlaeIEERINC ldtvlttf ��JJ PRELIMINARY PLAT MVP ROA.0+OAR T.. IT,..-•..11 UNION PLACE • Mal as SWIM II. Rn.A.sl R.+.f..w ii , • AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING • On the 11+11 day of r \aA,w'k%L , I98q, I deposited in the mai s of the Un ed Staties a sealed envelope containing Neax1Ni E .cunitW Dtppvt5A documents. This information was sent to: NAME: REPRESENTING: S-k..ev Lets, 0akwo04 440ry es Jon Gods el O tx,kWQx Wlet • • SIGNED BY: gaargeLmL \K— SUBSCR ED �° AND SWORN to before me this , day of , i.CtkIai , rgiti \-6.-(_,,,ekeA otary, ublic: / :nd" .for"th State of Washington, residi�n, at = _ ,2_- ;tir/'.=(., , therein. Project Name and Number: Oakwrnc "^ T� �'S'. 1 - o1 I - 86) ,P,�, e . - OF R4, A -I/ i?,41, .111. -.....,/ A..1.1.. 't 4i 41 ^''',,l.}.., "4";,''' , i.,i - . ...'. . .1.1'.:',''.;' . • ; ,,,,A.e.,tpi,41,,,, -0.AM\, •z .14,fte,.1.0,i...,,. .,,,. ,• , Tivw - "..ft,,# 47fri"C , • , , '1!. 0 : •• , r ..•. ,, , 0 mmws .9.1 Ire.1..11.. nr . ,0 '',,7... ;0'.... '•...'. ', n:.,,e ts- 'C.," 0 1)4 • (0 SEPl 'e° City of Renton Land Use Hearing Examiner will hold a ,,,,„, .,, , pt.1.,,-,r ..7;,.:, !L .... . 0', ,'.4;.:'-: .,,.. „ 0 . lk. ,', 1.4- r• ,i• IV' V .-. , .,-00,ir, Aiti •4,,v •:,,,, . . #. '''•:i. '''''' ''''''': 4,',1 '''::). :0 .•••''.'•:.: • „ '''.* !'f''. ;••,'' :.--•':, '1- 1; ..t •„,...i.;• •,,s, .-• -...... ,4,.. :-:' •,,, •:,-4 gi.,...i.::••• - t.:•• , 4, • :', :P.tr,..17,,,„.., . . .. ..k 1._ -'::, ,, . V• ' ; 161r. V - ... ,. ,••• :... I ',/ . HE „ i, , . .,, , , . , , . ...... „.... , . ,. , '•--:* 62.,A6 .1,,Zg-i' ,;4.' , • in CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS , CITY HALL JANUARY 24, 1989 9: °° AKA . ON BEGINNING AT A.M. P.M. ECF-091-88, R-091-88, PP-091-88 'e UV4/ ,o, ING• OAKWOOD HOMES/UNION PLACE APPLICANT SEEKS TO REZONE A 2 . 06 ACRE PARCEL FROM G-1, GENERAL USE, TO R-1, SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL USE, AND TO CREATE A TEN (10) LOT PRELIMINARY PLAT. THE PROPERTY IS LOCATED AT 763 UNION AVENUE N.E. :1; 1"141"1",1„,"1-11U-L12-11 I i .„;-1,;"--•-,4- 24,-,-F-3'q-'4 r• VO' ‘ 1;c4.1.1<,Ik•"1-1"I'.'i•T' LTI'M'I'lly -• li ,, . _,•• _ , 5. , i ;v----,, ' .,.....:4,14 911•Vii,1 -.,::2-i--..F, ,.. .,\.,'„.; --„1.7 .c.:-•-.q 05,,,,(t LI Ai. . I. ?),,TO ... v . -• .^ - ' .. " "1 . "_a14' ! •. ',1_, II. d ,.., tr '..- ' 1 . rs 4 —• r--) ••• • .\' ./:%-!JA-. > .0 .., 1.m!-T ri n' ;•'-' , 1.4,17.,________M__.).!.. ..7°,!vpr r.„.. I' ot_ VI;Tr( 3" ____,--1-- 21 _';'',I. •.- DEL, 1, 1",•,..,„ .1 ... .. ...\i,i•;,, ..:.,....11. ,, . .. . it'••1.•Ll'i'l. Lzi_ ..71.-'; I ' '%Fr-Ltil,` .:-..•;i14.k,1,1 --- -L-1.i.-1., _7_7.1:if.)11.;-..„!:,'.‹. ,n ii. • ...,... G-1 . . _..._:::: 41---77J, 4 :: ,-. . r.'"-----1,7:_ -+-S ; 1:2 • ''._ t.y' 7—rdz T. i -1--. . .... !•mt -TT r., . 1.2 . ,• .., fill 1;id 401 ,.. ;;.- 1 31—,'11 --Lit ---. • '!'.%I.:.':,-41'.';',',-.."*. ... /r . .,I ---1. lc 3•"/" ;•1'71 11'1 '" ' i 41.' 4'14" " '.1 [`i 41' ' IY ' -.1 - ' ' . '' :i• -•••' '.1.„11015 ,. . •f•.---,.--.,,-b,4-I,r-.-,--4-.7- ..-.4,.-••-,_-i:_ --,--1• :. ...... .i•;:-•!•‘..-1,:,'--.',_,-,','--'-•.--• :1e.J--1.12.- s i 7-. I q_: ,, ,.,- 1,:.-1---.:4-:„,•,5i, —i,,_;••,.•,1•.-.,.,.,., .v -:.4 i 7pii Tid_ rp'J ffl : i r- 1 c R- 1 , 1-11 — - 1111 Oi ,l'(,[ 7 4 , 14 „..---- ---• ._7,-,_ ,_-__:1.-2. ,. ,.. ..\... . ••<,-`;!.. I R1 • - •• _ • IL • , . _....., . ••_,..,___,_. ;;;I: ,.:, t-Liz:e.:,, .! ...... • . ...., i .., ',MEI' DEvy • „cl I-- ' !2 3'7% -1 ' '' " •I''' ! ••• We.- ..... _ • .. . r.) . —MII LIE MEHIARY SCHOOL I ,; • ....=-D-Taff0166.. ,[,-.i. .:. 1 .-.-!--, ' '-': • '.'s "cc 0 : : r -I . •I r -. -. • ..... --, 1. ! I ' : S 7 4- . . -•,,:; ., i•)oppior clor 11‹.- -r5r1- . ,. , •4 1 ;14.i I 1..4 et .t el -, -. el 41 1... /...,... s, I r Ai. . NO „ ill _i:L1 ..,.., .. .4-1.:7 .1-7.1.7 1;. -!,. . " 11-.1 i-----\----- , .I: k_2_• ''•" .. .: 17----. . k s2r-'" '.!,:t .1_ 14151. /18111•4 .. .t .1 14 It 1\11N '''4, r I ::- :".;171111-.1T- . R - 2 , -1,_1,71+. A .1. 'J. -•-i -': . - . ( TT"-• , 1 , ,-...,-;-;- l -1 11 ,;;- G.-.1. 1 :12Tir...e.11'.,..!,2,--1-1-.; („11-. ',...;---..... --t -0 -- -: R-2 I -11-• r i '; • .\"1\---• ''-----:' -:• I .. 1...-_%,1„.- -i' E. Le,:r 5. ,Pie.:',.,:.•r::.1:: --1 1 ' I 1 .i- •.. ..,....• ‘-‘,1 •..i.1-.---;:.- g :,:- --..r,Fl•-••EAr lir'71-1..,.I11.,F 1,T 1:J::1 7_.7...1_:i7_1.I7-'7___T:_Ir i•',I I' •I "'I• Ir1:-71•54P i 1C:‘—nF•-r.--.:— / : I R -3 • •-,--, ( - • - . : •.,".'i;:;,-:: , : '.:Pti OF Rz., I C.::::'•::: ••- :,..- .4..: A — , & 0 . . 'A.. t,' ,:',:: - .: 'r4-1.0,-:":•AW,' N,•4;•,-,(;,;''''A'vrt- ,:i'i,?,•"-"- -- f . i. ••••;f:);T:';',,.: ',,,••• ,,,. A '-' 4'0 iiii• 7 rn''•- ''''",' 7 'IIII ,:r --' : ' 4 ‘: "l:'. ," ' •'' R ,*.q.f, ;$0.•.. . . .;! ! , •.•: w . 1 14.0 t•I'is , 'c. ; • : •.:. • •-::,;;,,::?:::.,'- ,•'...,.',1:4SEP pt. ' •',L"''.'' .'.'' ' : : .: City of Renton, Land Use Hearing Examiner will hold a ..., ;:: +. ..k• ,;,:i'%,i, ' ....14 : , -..., ,0.- P; ,?'. •401 i. •,,,f! -! ,!.. L -- 2:' ? t'f.'.- .- ?• ''''' :;:::'...•''');;;', ' :".:;'°',.; '74'.k.r. .f., ‘,... ',,,.' ' ( . .:: l'..:,:;.•:::'•:':: :.. ;;1'. 'I* 1 ,',, 2 L., ;'1,' !e4.,,..,* V•,.,, ,' , HEARING. . ' CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL JANUARY 24, 1989 9:00 .. 1:.:'.: ;:.' ...,.:. • /.- ON BEGINNING AT A.M. P.M. . . ECF-091-88, R-091-88, PP-091-88 '..-C','.1,-! :. •: . A 11':".P%••'::' '.1. .• •.';!:4 :;':''' :•:;:-';'''''';`: CONICERNING: OAKWOOD HOMES/UNION PLACE i',:,,,''.,•.; ". --.,-.:4> APPLICANT SEEKS TO REZONE A 2.06 ACRE PARCEL FROM G-1, GENERAL .. ::;::.: ''.:,:,:'.: ir • :. ,4:•. USE, TO R-1, .SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL USE, AND TO CREATE A TEN (10) LOT PRELIMINARY PLAT. THE PROPERTY IS LOCATED AT 763 UNION AVENUE N.E. : ';''/,; .1k°1-1.1!,'',41-Y,l'!•I'l`Ivy • • L t--1- ' 54-..7_5;\---21‘L " „,;,VY,srr.' :04-:...-').- I 1,2141...-..1Y73')' • ..'.:,;',...• ,', • : ..::::' .',.) 7r::.!. [I'll;--r di ..'. "7'',a•' ---*", .'-,;-1-`.71.-.- pet.:.pi :i.,1 .'.4.. .;p,i';,:i I:4: ' - , 1,,'' '::: . : .:•!i',; Htlr:Prd----;,-;„ !--0 : ,;: v.--4,2.;; ; '.1:' •L .1 7-..rc. ; ..___,..0. ,:l._.4 st.___.'-og< G-1 • ...11,,N: TIT. `-t' - " 't ..ti,-;;-it 'I2.ti"•'Tilt t ,I!•':11:•_4:41„1-i;-- ' :.,I --- , i R ./'Tr) 2-12.1! _L____ 0;.II f—i —, :fe' •' IB17i --;.., 1 ._,. .:,.:f ;•-•' 7 !I T 3 ILI °92 7 2111-11111-HIJYiti ' • ' - 141_1_ '. ' • ''' 1-1--. [ t ." & 2. Ltr-1 '.• •A .• :;r....),....,:,:s.:,,i!•:,.. „Li 1 1.114.jj 1:iyi,ri ,_ 1. , 1_. ,.... u .R 1 TT:m:1,1777D. (-11- ,!.11:17,1:1;;":ip;i:71,--n 7- '' .... - - y diLITEcT,1:1,17 EGI-ft IITifil r••r i .,,p.i.:,.,--...,,,,,,,,,,,,,..,:",,i,...6,.4.1..,,,.:,:-....,,:,:4,,,,,;,:.72,..iz,.). :•• . _ .,4,:iiiii-1:-; ,i--•7•A, :•,.,..A‘; 1 .--- R-1 - . -,:::.:::,,:,..,.'. .':':•::7.,.,: ,:.-;-::,.- . -,,,,,-..-.,,,7.".,,,f =ii. 1 :f If:i--7;• '4-1'' 1i, .,,•2: -',‘:''. ;1, 1',','"i3 -- .----L-•t. ,,--,,,,.',1,tir:e',.. .; -.1 ;_-.. ',.',,:',-..:,:;• • ± !..iL.;•(• ,., hotiE DEW . I - • E",.. Z.".'. . . .'. .; ,:i_;-1..;,,,- ,;: —operm—inn LIE mEIHARY SCHOOL i :, • , ''-:",''...•.i•:.• ',.'‘, -,:: '7:','C. ._tii!FliTniTiJII,:if..d i ,!:•-i--i' A ' MI i ',';.i ; :•;',1 :',:;„ .. .:::A _ _, I, , 1 1 1 2. i-..1- .n. 73,.: jp 2 Air _ 1-- 7 IF: . _jf, ,.17,,7---ci;. _i a.lor, d.. n-1 I ,0 I • ,, , 7F,IFFIT--7-7.--.:4-7-, :1:A •.0 T. ;:.-., , t:::.:.•':.':,:`,": 1::: ::. '.:.:g .t_.11.1,i. ,I.I,,.. 1.. .. .. ..V;\_ ''. , ,:- TITITIT R-2 ,c,..,,,,,„,.., .:, .,, ,, . • ir.„..4,...,.,,J 1 _. . __ :••••.+ . , ... - 1 ::.:• -:.',,,,I,' : :. : 1 rz....,,.....;, - : 1 ' 7 -. •:,1 Fl•-•fi n-1 R-2 1 I '. •- .. :-,-,•,...,j;•,.,..;:„, n.,1(4.• ': 1' -i VR W . ;.i'::.::".:'::;.' .'.-1 :••:,,!,,,i,', _Li ,• '‘A.....1.1:,.:-g !EL,:v,-t! -?-, '6T.Ili •-' 1 .• wri •-.r.91 :) ii ___ ___, _ Ii—3 ri. ..tt- ;4 l- r-P 1' ' 1---)----_„,_--1 •1;•,• •••:•_ ,",,,,,,t,."..., •• -. ., - • B• GENEVIAILLILL C I\I .r.!:11‘113-/-1,4•4437-nZplare.:0 •--- .--0 .--AT1-4) . r. .... , ..... , . 0.% I •'; PROPERTY LOCATED AT 763 UNION AVENUE N.E. !;',,;., :;,. • 4.; ,,,:.:.-•:."- ' ,%ci . • .,. -..:.,,-4 • ;c:51 ' :,';• :". '. ' c! FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CALL THE CITY OF RENTON . , ,:;,:!....A'•.'4,.,.. .'.' , ,?'(; BUILDING&ZONING DEPARTMENT 235-2550''':'-:-,•'''''i''.:.:',..:::- '.1,''S.'il THIS NOTICE NOT TO BE REMOVED WITHOUT-_ ___ _ 3.':: c.-.':;:, •.• . Y 't'1, PROPER AUTHORIZATION . , CERTIFICATION v e I.a. ,. HEREBY CERTIFY THAT 3 - . COPIES OF - THE ABOVE DOCUMENT WERE POSTED BY ME IN 1 CONSPICUOUS • PLACES ON OR NEARBY THE DESCRIBED PROPERTY ON -76.3 Union Ave,n Ist,E. • • ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a Notary Public, in and for the State of Washington . residi ir7j7r7)k--1 , on the/=? a SIGNED : Ina,/ Joibude- ' day of L 9 1 _/c)1J-Pr .q. se_e_cga NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON HEARING EXAMINER RENTON,WASHINGTON AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION A PUBLIC ELD BY THE RENTON EHEARARING ING E LL AMIBE iNER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUN- CIL CHAMBERS ON THE SECOND Audrey Benner ,being first duly sworn on oath states FLOOR OF CITY HALL, RENTON, WASH- INGTON, ON JANUARY 24, 1989,AT 9:00 that he/she is the Chief Clerk of the A.M. TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PETITION: OAKWOOD HOMES/UNION PLACE VALLEY DAILY NEWS (ECF;R;PP-091-88) Applicant seeks to rezone a 2.06 acre par- • Kent Edition • Renton Edition • Auburn Edition cel from G-1, General Use, to R-1, Single- Family Residential Use,and to create a ten Daily (10)newspapers six (6) times a week.That said newspapers loca lot at 7 3 preliminary Aveplat The property is publishedlocated 763 Union Avenue N.E. are legal newspapers and are now and have been for more than six Legal descriptions of the file noted months prior to the date of publication referred to,printed and published above are on file in the Renton Community Development Department. in the English language continually as daily newspapers in Kent, King ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID County,Washington.The Valley Daily News has been approved as a legal PETITION ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT ATnewspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for 24,THE PUBLIC HEARING TO JANUARY p g 1989, AT 9:00 A.M. EXPRESS King County. THEIR OPINIONS. Published January 13, 1989 Valley Daily News R5178 The notice in the exact form attached,was published in the Kent Edition , Renton Edition x , Auburn Edition , (and not in supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers during the below stated period.The annexed notice a Notice of Public nearing was published on January 13, 19 89 R5178 The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of $ 21 .2 8 Subscribed and sworn to before me this 19thdayof January 19_8 Notary Public for the State of Washington, residing at Federal Way, King County, Washington. VDN#87 Revised 11/86 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON HEARING EXAMINER RENTON, WASHINGTON A ,PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS ON THE SECOND FLOOR OF CITY HALL, RENTON, WASHINGTON, ON JANUARY 24, 1989, AT 9 : 00 A.M. TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PETITION: OAKWOOD HOMES/UNION PLACE ECF; R; PP-091-88 Applicant seeks to rezone a 2 . 06 acre parcel from G-1, General Use, to R-I, Single-Family Residential Use, and to create a ten (10) lot preliminary plat. The property is located at 763 Union Avenue N.E. Legal descriptions of the file noted above are on file in the Renton Community Development Department. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETITION ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT - AT THE PUBLIC HEARING ON JANUARY 24, 1989, AT 9 : 00 A.M. TO EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS. Published: January 13 , 1989 %i CITY OF RENTON NLL DEPARTMENT.OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor PLANNING DIVISION January 9, 1988 Steve Lusa c/o John Godsey 12655 S.W. Center #360 Beaverton, OR 97005 RE: Oakwood Homes, 763 Union Avenue N.E. ECF; R; PP-091-88 Dear Mr. Lusa: A public hearing before the City of Renton Land Use Hearing Examiner has been scheduled for January 24, 1989.- The public hearing commences at 9:00 a.m. in the Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall. The applicant or representative(s) .of the applicant is required to be present at the public hearing. A copy of the staff report will be mailed to you before the hearing. If you have any questions, please call235-2550. rely, Donald K. Erickson, AICP • Zoning. Administrator DKE:mjp cc: Philip R. Barber 801 Union Avenue N.E. Renton, WA 98055 200 Mill.Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2550 y. NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION Environmental Review Committee Renton, Washington The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated for the following projects under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code. The following Applicants have completed a mitigation process: OAKWOOD HOMES/UNION PLACE ECF; R; PP-091-88 Applicant seeks to rezone a 2.06 acre parcel from G-1, General Use, to R-1, Single-Family Residential Use, and to create a ten (10) lot preliminary plat. The property is located at 763 Union Avenue N.E. Further information regarding this action is available in the Community Development Department, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington, 235-2550. This Determination is FINAL. There is a 14 day appeal period which will end at 5: 00' PM on January 10, 1989. Any appeal of this decision may be made to the City's Hearing Examiner, Municipal Building, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, Washington. An appeal must state clearly, in writing, why the Determination should be revised and must be accompanied by a non-refundable $75.00 filing fee. Published: December 26, 1988 N SEPA/LAND USE APPLICATION PROCESSING PROCEDURES October 1988 • DATE INITIALS 1. Pre-application conference held (highly recommended for major projects.) 2. Application received and appropriate application fees collected. *3. Front office staff stamps date application received (staff receiving the application should date stamp at least Master Application form, and every drawing should be stamped.) r 4. Decision made on whether or not project is categorically exempt under SEPA. Application Review 1. Application reviewed by assigned Planning staff person for completeness: a. Application compared to handout on required documentation and plans for complete application. Review includes indication of compliance with zoning, other code requirements and/or covenants, or Examiner's conditions as well as completeness of environmental checklist. This information is to be recorded on the Plan Check Review Sheet. *b. If application is complete, reviewer prepares letter of acceptance, fills out review sheets (reviewer coordinates dates for environmental review and land use review with Zoning Administrator or Senior Planner), and goes to next step. c. If_project complete, secretary sets up project disk. *d. If application incomplete, reviewer prepares letter to the applicant requesting additional information. When new material received, reviewer repeats Steps a. and b. e. Project and application presented to Zoning Administrator for group discussion of issues (at least weekly). NOTE: Items with asterisk are to be checked as to accuracy or completeness by either the Zoning Administrator or the Senior Planner. Application Routing and Return 1. Preparation of application for routing. 0116 p6 SS 2. File Clerk completes routing preparation and routing of applications. ��/7/ f SS SEPA/LAND USE Application ___iedures October 1988 Page 2 DATE INITIALS *3. Returned circulation files shall be stamped by the front counter staff to reflect the date they are returned to the Planning Division. 4. Secretary receives and handles routing folder. 5. File clerk files routing folders. 6. Photographs and/or video taken, as needed. Environmental Review 1. TAC agenda prepared for subject applications (check item 6.c.) and distributed to TAC members Friday p.m. before meeting. 2. TAC staff reports and tentative recommendations prepared for subject applications and submitted to Zoning 'Administrator for his review by Monday noon preceding ERC meeting. 3. ERC agenda prepared for subject applications (check item 6.c) and distributed to ERC members Friday p.m. 4. ERC staff reports and recommendations prepared for subject application and submitted to Zoning Administrator for his review by Monday Noon preceding ERC meeting. 5. Reports revised if necessary (typos, etc.), and then placed in application folders. 6. Threshold environmental determination (DNS-Mitigated or DS) issued by ERC with Committee members' signatures on form. 9r *a. Prepare letters to parties of record regarding decision. /01l l/? Is *b. Prepare legal notice and send ' to newspaper advertising 15 day comment.period by first Friday noon following ERC meeting. c. Prepare posters. d. Posters placed on or near site. e. Place'reduction of legal notice in City Hall reader board. *f. Send notice of ERC Threshold Determination and Environmental /)///f Checklist for 15 day comment period to DOE for inclusion in SEPA register. rf I' *g. Prepare and send notices to jurisdictions (King County, Department of Game) with an interest in project (if required). - • SEPA/LAND USE Application_ __Jcedures October 1988 Page 3 DATE INITIALS 7. Environmental decision finalized and issued by ERC. 0 a. If no significant comments received and ERC decision is not revised, /2-f aJJ3l letter "finalized" environmental determination sent to all parties of record informing them that the threshold decision sent to them is final and has remained unchanged and the date the appeal period ends. *b. If significant comments are received and the ERC decision is revised, then the following steps must be taken. 1. Prepare revised Determination,if necessary, for mailing to all parties of record and Department of Ecology. *2. Mail revised Determination to all parties of record and Department of Ecology if necessary. *c. ' Prepare legal notice and send to newspaper stating ERC decision and 14 lc/td J '% YID' day appeal period. *d. Prepare posters; e. Post on or near subject property; f. Place reduction of legal notice in City Hall reader board. g. Submit copy of SEPA decision to City Clerk's office for Public Information T.V. Bulletin Board. Shoreline Exemptions/No Land Use. 1. Prepare shoreline exemption decisions for Zoning Administrator's signature. 2. Prepare package for mailing shoreline exemptions to the Department of Ecology (Shorelands Division). Land Use Review 1. Preparation for Public Hearing (SEPA appeals, rezones, special permits, conditional uses, larger site plan reviews, and subdivision applications.) 2. Public hearing agenda established with concurrence of Hearing Examiner and Zoning Administrator. *3. Public hearing legal notice sent to newspaper at least 10 days in advance of public hearing. 4. Prepare agenda for public hearing.. . 5. Reduction of public hearing legal notice place in reader board. SEPA/LAND USE Application _..,cedures October 1988 Page 4 DATE INITIALS *6. Notices to adjacent property owners for plats sent out at least 10 days in advance of public hearing. *7. Letter to parties of record of public hearing at least 10 days in advance of public hearing. *8. Exhibits prepared for public hearing. 9. Staff report prepared. 10. Reviewed by Zoning Administrator at least 8 days prior to hearing. 11. Staff report put together and copied and then forwarded to Hearing Examiner at least 7 days prior to hearing. 12. Staff report sent to all parties of record for public hearing. 13. Reports revised (typos, etc.) and reports placed in appropriate files with at - least 2 extra copies for the hearing. 14. Hearing Examiner report reviewed and findings discussed with applicant. • 15. Presentation of staff analysis and recommendations to Hearing Examiner by Zoning Administrator or Senior Planner. Appeal Hearings 1. Appeal hearings are held occasionally. Preparation of these hearings is the same as for a regular public hearing: publication, notices to parties of record, and posters. Normally these hearings do not require preparation of a staff report/response. This is done at the discretion of the Zoning Administrator. 2. Presentation by Staff. Shorelines Substantial Developments 1. Substantial Development Permits prepared for signature of Planning Manager and Building Official. 2. Prepare submittal package including original application, Hearing Examiner' decision (if project required such), environmental checklist, environmental decision, maps, shoreline permit decision, and legal notice. 3. Mail application package to Department of Ecology and Attorney General's office together with copy of permit. SEPA/LAND USE Applicatioz_ _._ icedures - October 1988 Page 5 DATE INITIALS Subdivisions, Short Plats. and Lot Line Adjustments. 1. Mylar checked by Planning Division. 2. Mylar sent to Don Monaghan for checking as soon as approved by Examiner and received by applicant. 3. Plat Preparation for Recording a. Blueprints made for King County using blueprint machine in Public Works. b. Sepia made for Engineering using blueprint machine in Public Works. c. Give two blueprints and mylar to City Clerk's office for filing with King County. Building Project Compliance with Imposed Conditions *1. Project checked for compliance with conditions of approval, SEPA, site plan approval, rezone approval,, subdivision approval or conditional use approval prior to the issuance of the building permit. *2. Zoning Administrator and Hearing Examiner so notified in writing. (Must ensure Parks, Long Range Planning, and Police conditions are covered.) y- NOTICE ENVIRONMENTAL APPLICATION NO.. ECF-091-88, PP-091-88, R-091-88 APPLICANT OAKWOOD HOMES/UNION PLACE PROPOSED ACTION APPLICANT SEEKS TO REZONE A 2 . 06 ACRE PARCEL FROM G-1, GENERAL USE, TO R-1, SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL USE, AND TO CREATE A TEN (10) LOT PRELIMINARY PLAT. GENERAL LOCATION AND/OR ADDRESS 763 UNION AVENUE N.E. POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (E.R.C.) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES DOES NOT _ HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT WILL KWILL NOT BE REQUIRED. THE CITY OF RENTON WILL NOT ACT ON THIS " PROPOSAL FOR 15 DAYS FROM THE DATE BELOW. COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY AN APPEAL OF THE ABOVE DETERMINATION MAY BE FILED WITH THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER BY 5:00 P.M., JANUARY 9, 1989 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON PLANNING DIVISION AT 235-2550. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION. f1N' * TICE1 is ri;, �i.. •..t,( j f.• , , , ,1.; s' � .�ilygi , 6 1ENVIRONMENTAL ,, ,, k, DECLARATION APPLICATION NO. • i ECF-091-88, PP-091-88, R-091-88 APPLICANT OAKWOOD HOMES/UNION PLACE x ,t` PROPOSED ACTION • APPLICANT SEEKS TO REZONE A 2.06 ACRE PARCEL FROM G-1, GENERAL USE, TO R-1, SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL USE, AND 4 ' ? TO CREATE A TEN (10) LOT PRELIMINARY PLAT. t3 41 GENERAL LOCATION AND/OR ADDRESS l' i; 763 UNIION AVENUE N.E. , POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS j OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION: j I THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (E.R.C.) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES Xi DOES NOT _ I HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. 1, i .:: s 1 AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT h WILL WILL NOT - ' i {': .. BE REQUIRED. ;; THE CITY OF RENTON WILL NOT ACT ON THIS 'i " PROPOSAL FOR 15 DAYS FROM THE DATE BELOW. 'j COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY '' AN APPEAL OF THE ABOVE DETERMINATION MAY `s BE FILED WITH THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER v' ; BY 5:00 P.M., JANUARY 9, 1989 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON :-! j. PLANNING DIVISION AT 235-2550. , "- I DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE , ) , j WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION. CERTIFICATION I , ipj(22 i--, LINx , HEREBY CERTIFY THAT )/� ( -5) COPIES OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENT WERE POSTED BY ME IN i I- , ( 3) CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON OR NEARBY THE DESCRIBED PROPERTY ON L—) . . 30' t98S . ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a Notary Public in_and for the State of Washingtoru das'o, L�= on the — SIGNED : U1r'I�(�' r i 1 t 0,1,6,("g4.6, %• ® CITY OF RENTON DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor PLANNING DIVISION December 21, 1988 Steve Lusa c/o John Godsey 12655 S.W. Center #360 Beaverton, Oregon 97005 RE: Oakwood Homes, 763 Union Avenue N.E. ECF; R; PP-091-88 Dear Mr. Lusa: This letter is to inform you that the comment period has ended for the Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated for the above referenced project. No comments were received. The Committee's determination is final and may be appealed to the City's Hearing Examiner no later than 5:00 p.m. on January 9, 1989. Any appeal must state clearly why the determination should be revised and must be accompanied by a non-refundable $75.00 filing fee. If you have questions or desire clarification of the above, please call our office at 235- 2550. For the Environmental Review Committee, Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator DKE:mjp cc: Philip R. Barber 801 Union Avenue N.E. • Renton, WA 98055 • 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2550 WILLIAM R. WILKERSON w`•'' ^ "`> PLANNING DIVISION Director .. • �'"4 saes °y CITY OF RENTON STATE OF WASHINGTON , DEPARTMENT OF FISHERIES ; DEC 1 9 1989 Building 4 Room 2129V E 7600 Sand Point Way N.E. • Bin C15700 • Seattle; Washington 98115. .• 06)�54145,3 December 16, 1988 Environmental Review Committee c/o Don Erickson, Zoning Administrator . Planning Division " Community Development Department 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 RE: ()Environmental Checklist No . ECF-048-88 . . : Application No . SA-048-88 Kohl. Excavating (Fisheries File 7529 ) x2)Environmental. Checklist No . ECF-091-88 Application No.. R; PP-091-88 Oakwood Homes, Inc./Steve Lusa (Fisheries File 7544 ) Dear Mr . Erickson: Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the above proposals. The Washington Department of Fisheries ' primary concerns are related to storm water run-off . The introduction of pollutants such as oils, heavy metals, phosphates, etc. constitutes one of the more serious impacts to urban area streams and rivers . These pollutants enter the rivers and streams through storm run-off systems . Most run-off system designs consist of underground pipes leading to either underground detention vaults or detention ponds designed to - prevent downstream flooding. Unfortunately, even with oil/water separators, these systems concentrate pollutants, then discharge them to the receiving waters . Therefore, some means to remove typical urban-related pollutants is necessary in addition to the standard oil/water separators. This can be accomplished by designing shallow grass-lined swales' leading to open detention ponds large enough to establish vegetation within them. It is that vegetation, acting in concert- with the grass-lined swales, which create a bio-filter . . An Hydraulic Project Approval will be required for any work within the ordinary high water mark of state waters . This includes installation of- a storm water run-off outfall to the stream. • . � - Wig,;"�R'`3 . Thank you for again this opportunity to comment . If you have any questions regarding these comments please contact me at ( 206 ) 545-6582 . Sincerely, Gayle Kreitman Regional Habitat Manager . cc: •WDF - Olympia . e•METRo lirMunicipality of Metropolitan Seattle Exchange Building I 821 Second Ave. • Seattle,WA 98104-1598 December 16, 1988 PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF RENTON DEC 20 1989 IR Environmental Review Committee ECEIVE c/o Donald K. Erickson Zoning Administrator Planning Department 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 Determination of Non-Significance File No. : PP-091-88 Oakwood Homes, Inc./Steve Lusa Dear Environmental Review Committee: Metro staff has reviewed this proposal and anticipates no significant impacts to its wastewater facilities or public transportation services. Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment. Sincerely, Gregorya M. Bush, Manager Environmental Planning Division GMB:wsg .• AL DECLARATIIN APPLICATION NO. ECF-091-88, R-091-88, PP-091-88 APPLICANT OAKWOOD HOMES/UNION PLACE PROPOSED ACTION APPLICANT SEEKS TO REZONE A 2.06 ACRE PARCEL FROM G-1, GENERAL USE, TO R-1, SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL USE, AND I ' TO CREATE A TEN (10) LOT PRELIMINARY PLAT. GENERAL LOCATION AND/OR ADDRESS 763 UNION AVENUE N.E. • POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (E.R.C.) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES XDOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT WILL si,WILL NOT BE REQUIRED. THE CITY OF RENTON WILL NOT ACT ON THIS • PROPOSAL FOR 15 DAYS FROM THE DATE BELOW. COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY DECEMBER 20, 1908 AN APPEAL OF THE ABOVE DETERMINATION MAY BE FILED WITH THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER • BY 5:00 P.M., . FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON PLANNING DIVISION AT 235-2550. _-_ _.- - _- -DO NOT REMOVE—THIS -NOTICE —� �- ----_._ _T__ WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION. CERTIFICATION I , Glary &.Vela , HEREBY CERTIFY THAT 3 COPIES OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENT WERE POSTED BY ME IN CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON OR NEARBY THE DESCRIBED PROPERTY ON 76.E �. Qjj,e,. A, e , ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a Notary Public;''in and for the State of Washington • residing in Z h.)-rE .) , on the 1.2(31. SIGNED • jaifejet, day of)Qc ..� u. ,„) t 4 I Ley ti 4tir DECLARATION APPLICATION NO.. ECF-091-88 , R-091-88 , PP-091-88 APPLICANT OAKWOOD HOMES/UNION PLACE PROPOSED ACTION APPLICANT SEEKS TO REZONE A 2 . 06 ACRE PARCEL FROM G-1, GENERAL USE, TO R-1, SINGLE-FAMILY .RESIDENTIAL USE, AND TO CREATE A TEN (10) LOT PRELIMINARY PLAT. GENERAL LOCATION AND/OR ADDRESS 763 UNION AVENUE N.E. POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (E.R.C.) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES FIDOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. • AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT WILL I1WILL NOT BE REQUIRED. THE CITY OF RENTON WILL NOT ACT ON THIS PROPOSAL FOR 15 DAYS FROM THE DATE BELOW. COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY DECEMBER 20, 1988 AN APPEAL OF THE ABOVE DETERMINATION MAY BE FILED WITH THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER BY 5:00 P.M., FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON PLANNING DIVISION AT 235-2550 . DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE \ WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION. %o 0 CITY OF RENTON am.LL DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor PLANNING DIVISION December 5, 1988 Steve Lusa c/o John Godsey 12655 S.W. Center Beaverton, OR 97005 Re: Oakwood Homes, 763 Union Avenue N.E. ECF; R; PP-091-88 Dear.Mr. Lusa: This letter is to inform you that the Environmental Review Committee completed their review of the environmental impacts of the above referenced project. The Committee on November 30, 1988 decided that your project may be issued a Determination of Non- Significance-Mitigated with the following conditions: ' 1. That the applicant provide trip assessment fees of $2.37 per A!WDTE for off-site improvements, as well as on-site improvements to ensure safety and efficiency of access, subject to TBID requirements and approval by the Traffic Engineering Division. 2. That the applicant provide a tree inventory and a tree preservation plan, for the site, subject to approval by the City's landscape planner. 3. That the applicant provide a site plan for on-site landscaping and screening to mitigate noise, light and glare to and possibly from adjacent properties. ote odd fiade. '"' 4. That the applicant provide a storm drainage improvement plane subject to approval by the Public Works Department. P mate:. he applicant is encouraged to contribute to funds o improve the City' pu cc / , recreat'on sp es It ¢`t/ 4401 .Ne<te That the applicant provide for on-site and off-site improvements (e.g. utility service lines, street lighting) subject to approval by the Public Works Department. 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2550 ' • • COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE ' STAFF REPORT November 30, 1988 A• BACKGROUND: • APPLICANT: Oakwood Homes, Inc./Steve Lusa . PROJECT: Union Place (Rezone and Preliminary Plat) ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST: ECF; R; PP 091-88 'k{ DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Applicant seeks, to rezone a 2. 06 acre parcel from G-1, General Use, to R-1, Single-Family Residential Use, and to create a ten (10) lot preliminary plat. LOCATION; OF PROPOSAL: 763 Union Avenue N.E. • m�in �i,'.G Ii.'..':- _-_ E. w 19 a .__. - 1 :: • �:' 1Z ' I ,1 11 a 1,./ .., ��� +/� o .IeI1;�' 1� s � ! � � E utti 1 'J£ N E n IM '1 •,�•il I I ,5�►'3` 1 1� l� l !a I I I I I`�J� -- ('^LM, '1(4 T >1.l , �F -3 V.-= E•1' + allt I• 4 4-9.96 b /LI • 9 II It 147. !l • _. Inii_ ______. r,j,.. . „-. r-• 1i ..NT LP(� •) _ II' IVI� :' IC I+ � .'' N >; .I, . n • i 17..-:24: '�'l a a .eeei+ F .} 4 _ 'r 4. 11 5 la •• ' �':.'1 E IU, `* 4 le ;, 1e O® a .1 �`L. I e ) .N t. - • IOU' PLJ K1� � ....JJ/ 1 ,1 1 + 'A O r& CT '9 I 1 6 -1 'I I = `3 SAC I d 3.; ,.: 7 e•9 IV n ='\ • V I ` Illt+ . .. 131a 16 iS J/.1t'I ' I "I'219 6 I 4 4 ! .e .9143 q 13 ,41 ./1 II ,....,„, , I ..,, • , . I• 1.411E .:• Eil �I _T L J i• 1 ... +. 1 .1 .1 ,• .1 , I.=• Nu � •l W a 1 ,Ad �`/' L__. L � Q• e • ,e a �, 1 �jd�l 1 --r] 'R— 1 c.•.. '',IfL.e'fI.I id rf rq� 1i 1 l S T I !. .•' IWIL, alai j • . • * 4.. .. 1I ' i:' icip !" • 4 • K11.IAN1S _jj ' 4 WARK �c,��';n • , w HONEY DEW , E e"' I ` . "`°r ^� , n , F 1 • ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 1 • . • T•1 LI4 1 1L. . 1 ' - • o . •' _ isi. a • • -- I 4 ! ; 1, I ® g 'le II ,E 13 '' ° ! St I I ___ _'1 i c/11�9 Irmil 1:.. j: ;}. : I . �; ,.I.. fI. ee + 1 i • A-4 I -'de i t • I I I ..i I."It' : 1 I_, 1 ` , •i.If.I,.1.11,•1,.... t..-_. -- ?r^�i.. .• R 2 L 1• I! 1• ! Ia,.9 I.0 a •,I 1.1i f•t� I r4 • •`' +I•�`1 ., • _` 441:1 N E I v :J+.1`...• •+'• •,5 ,, 9 z 1. • R— 1 R GI - ▪•7f7ji • ,vT • • I —1 L' i 12 r '.II'i ll1• ill '�i„ b'"-Ir •',1•I'.' • 1— ;-T•p..,774 1 o �- a to..} 11, .-..-•--- ---•--� `� • �..1•..•..1.•i..1..i..I 1 odl•ia 41 1.r'••I.I111.Ii Il J 1 •. !! N 0..11 1; ;1 • ll 11111 11111 111 ll I: ..,,• ,i ..l ' I JY♦ te, n 1'1-- '1 - , - R-1 111,�. i I R-1 T I L... —1 Environmental Re :w Committee Staff Report Oakwood Homes, Inc. , Union Place Page 2 November 30, 1988 B. ANALYSIS 1. BACKGROUND: 2 . ISSUES: 1. Whether the proposed actions and subsequent development will have significant impacts upon circulation patterns on-site and on the adiacent public rights-of-way? The proposed rezone action does not directly affect local circulation patterns. However the design of the preliminary plat and the proposed future development plan for the property will constrain access to the property due north of the subject site. The estimated one hundred vehicular trips a day (50 round trips) from the proposed ten (10) single-family homes will impact traffic along Duvall Avenue N.E. Staff recommends that: a) An agreement be negotiated between the applicant and the owner of the property to the north of the subject site to provide access through this proposed subdivision (perhaps Lot #3 and/or #4) , if the property owner so desires. The plans for any access road should be subject to approval by the Traffic Engineer and the Fire Prevention Bureau. b) A plan be provided by the applicant to develop on-site signage and, perhaps, other safety devices (e.g. signalization, crosswalks) to improve safety for pedestrians and vehicles and to provide for efficient circulation. c) The applicant be required to participate in a. TBID, for off-site improvements. 2 . Whether the proposed action and subsequent development will have significant light, glare and noise impacts on the site and/or upon neighboring properties? Staff believes that the subdivision and introduction of ten new single-family homes has the potential for some increase of light, glare and noise to the area which is currently zoned primarily as G-1 or R-1 and developed at a low level of density. Staff recommends that such impacts be addressed by mitigating measures which include, but are not limited to: a) Environmental Re .w Committee Staff Report Oakwood Homes, Inc. , Union Place Page 3 November 30, 1988 preservation of existing plant life to the greatest extent possible; b) provision of new landscaping and fencing to screen the site as necessary; and c) design of structures and access points to minimize glare and noise. 3 . Whether available public recreation areas are adequate to serve the subject proposed development? The subject property is located within approximately 150 feet of Kiwanis Park. Thus, adequate public recreation space is now available to the site. Staff urges the applicant to contribute to a City fund for improvement of public recreation space. Additionally, staff recommends that the applicant be required to develop on site open space recreation areas for children and adults anticipated to live in the proposed single-family residences. 4 . Whether available public services/utilities and infrastructure are adequate to support the proposed subdivision and preliminary plat for future single-family development? Public services and infrastructure are available in the vicinity of the subject site. Utility lines are also in place. There is no "storm drainage management plan. The applicant should be required to install on-site and off-site improvements in conjunction with subdivision to meet Code regulations and to meet requirements established by Public Works and by the Fire Prevention Bureau of the City of Renton. C. RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff recommends that the Environmental Review Committee issue a Determination of Non-Significance - Mitigated - with the following conditions: 1. That the applicant provide trip assessment fees of $2 .37 per7UVWDTE for off-site improvements, as well as on- site improvements to ensure safety and efficiency of access, subject to TBID requirements and approval by the Traffic Engineering Division. 2 . That the applicant provide a tree inventory and a tree preservation plan, for the site, subject to approval by the City's landscape planner. 3 . That the applicant provide a site plan for on-site landscaping and screening to mitigate noise, light and glare to and possibly from adjacent properties. Environmental Re" 1w Committee Staff Report Oakwood Homes, Union Place Page 4 November 30, 1988 4. That the applicant provide open space for recreation on-site, with plans subject to approval by the landscape planner. Note: The applicant is encouraged to ,d contribute to funds to improve the City's public recreation spaces. 5. That the applicant provide a storm drainage improvement plans subject to approval by the Public Works Department. �f�C - That the applicant provide for on- , s " site and off-site improvements• subject V o approval by the Public Work J <4 � n �,� Department. � ����v�5 s�c�,e� \\\\:, cillievo 7. That the applicant shall be required to provide an agreement with the owner of the property to the north of the subject site in which the applicant guarantees future vehicular access through this proposed subdivision, if the property owner so desires. D. COMMENTS OF REVIEWING EPARTMENTS: Various City departments have reviewed and commented upon the project. These comments are as follows: Police Department: No comment. Fire Prevention Bureau: Probable minor impact only. Design Engineering: Probable minor impact only. No objection to rezone. Traffic Engineering: Probable minor impact only. No objection to rezone. Utility Engineering: Probable minor impact only. Parks and Recreation: Building Division: Probable minor impact only. Current Planning Division: Long Range Planning.: Proposed use is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. However, some environmental concerns are as follows: Homes adjacent to the street will be affected by the traffic noise, and the existing trees on site provide aesthetic amenities and should be retained where feasible. N COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE STAFF REPORT November 30, 1988 A. BACKGROUND: APPLICANT: Oakwood Homes, Inc./Steve Lusa PROJECT: Union Place (Rezone and Preliminary Plat) ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST: ECF; R; PP 091-88 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Applicant seeks to rezone a 2. 06 acre parcel from G-1, General Use, to R-1, Single-Family Residential Use, and to create a ten (10) lot preliminary plat. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 763 Union Avenue N.E. Environmental Re•'' ?w Committee Staff Report — Oakwood Homes, I ,_ , , Union Place Page 2 November 30, 1988 B. ANALYSIS 1. BACKGROUND: 2 . ISSUES: 1. Whether the proposed actions and subsequent development will have significant impacts upon circulation patterns on-site and on the adjacenta public rights-of-way? The proposed rezone action doe not directly affect local circulation patterns. However the desin of the preliminary plat and the p oposed future development plan for the roperty will V,\ constrain access to the roperty duel north of the subject site. The (50 estimated one hundred /trips a dayAfrom the proposed ten (10) single-family homes will impact traffic along Duvall Avenue N.E. Staff recommends that: a) An agreement be negotiated between the applicant and the owner of the property to. the north of the subject site to provide access through this proposed subdivision (perhaps Lot #3 and/or #4) , if the property owner so desires. The plans for any access road should be subject to approval by the Traffic Engineer and the Fire Prevention Bureau. b) A plan be provided by the applicant to develop on-site signage and, perhaps, other safety devices (e.g. signalization, crosswalks) to improve safety for pedestrians and vehicles and to provide for efficient circulation. c) The applicant be required to participate in a TBID, for off-site improvements. 2 . Whether the proposed action and subsequent development will have significant light, glare and noise impacts on the site and/or upon neighboring properties? Staff believes that the subdivision and introduction of ten new single-family homes has the potential for some increase of light, glare and noise to the area which is currently zoned primarily as G-1 or R-1 and developed at a low level of density. Staff recommends that such impacts be addressed by mitigating measures which include, but are not limited to: a) Environmental Re- :w Committee Staff Report Oakwood Homes, L . , Union Place Page 3 November 30, 1988 preservation of existing plant life to the greatest extent possible; b) provision of new landscaping and fencing to screen the site as necessary; and c) `\ design of structures and access points to minimize 3 y glare and noise. 3 . Whether available public recreation areas are adequate to serve the subject proposed development? VLA The subject property is located within approximatelya; E*-7-44Aefeet of Kiwanis , J Park. Thus, adequate public recreation space is now available to the site. Staff urges the applicant to contribute ��� � � , ; to a City fund for improvement of public recreation space. Additionally, staff recommends that the applicant be required to develop on site open space recreation areas for children and adults anticipated to live in the proposed single-family residences. 4. Whether available public services/utilities and infrastructure are adequate to support the proposed subdivision and preliminary plat for future single-family development? Public services and infrastructure are available in the vicinity of the subject site. Utility lines are also in place. N, There is no storm drainage management plan 'he applicant should be required to install on-site and off-site improvements in conjunction with subdivision to meet Code regulations and to meet requirements established by Public Works and by the Fire Prevention Bureau of the City of Renton. C. RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff recommends that the Environmental Review Committee issue a Determination of Non-Significance - Mitigated - with //ll the following conditions: cii _ av�i 1. That the applicant provide trip assessment fees for off-site improvements, as well as on-site improvements to ensure safety and efficiency of access, subject to TBID requirements and approval by the Traffic Engineering Division. 2 . That the applicant provide a tree inventory and a tree preservation plan, for the site, subject to approval by the City's landscape planner. 3. That the applicant provide a pr-oj_ect `de g—and--A plan for on-site landscaping and screening to mitigate noise, light and glare to. adjacent properties. Environmental Re ' =:w Committee Staff Report Oakwood Homes, I. , Union Place Page 4 November 30, 1988 4. That the applicant provide open space for recreation on-site, with plans subject to approval by the landscape planner. 1 . That the applicant provide a storm drainage improvement plans subject to approval by the Public Works Department. 6. That the applicant provide for on- 3site and off-site improvements subject ��., to approval by the Public Works / 1: Department. j 7. That the applicant shall be required JI to provide an agreement with the owner o -he property to the north of the subjeat`-site in which the applicant guarantees access through this proposed subdivision, if the property owner so desires.. __ •Note: The applicant is encouraged to contribute to funds to improve the City's public recreation spaces. D. COMMENTS OF REVIEWING DEPARTMENTS: Various City departments have reviewed and commented upon the project. These comments are ,as follows: Police Department: No comment. Fire Prevention Bureau: Probable minor impact only. Design Engineering: Probable minor impact only. No objection to rezone. Traffic Engineering: Probable minor impact only. No objection to rezone. Utility Engineering: Probable minor impact only. Parks and Recreation: Building Division: Probable minor impact only. Current Planning Division: Long Range Planning: Proposed use is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. However, some environmental concerns are as follows: Homes adjacent to the street will be affected by the traffic noise, and the existing trees on site provide aesthetic amenities and should be retained where feasible. NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated for the following projects under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code. OAKWOOD HOMES/UNION PLACE ECF; R; PP-091-88 Applicant seeks to rezone a 2 . 06 acre parcel from G-1, General Use, to R-1, Single-Family Residential Use, and to create a ten (10) lot preliminary plat. The property is located at 763 Union Avenue N.E. SOUND SUZUKI ECF-113-88 Applicant seeks approval to expand an existing Sound Suzuki development. The proposed addition of approximately 5000 sq. ft. is subject to environmental review under SEPA regulations. The project conforms to regulations established in the Zoning Ordinance for development in a Light Industrial zone; it is not subject to site plan review because the City does not require such review in the L-1 zone. The property is located at 750 Rainier Avenue South. This decision will be finalized in 15 days. Written comments received after 5: 00 p.m. , December 20, 1988 will not be considered. A fourteen (14) day appeal period will commence following the finalization of DNS-M. The mitigation measures imposed by the City of Renton' s Environmental Review Committee are available at the Planning Division of the Community Development Department, Municipal Building Renton, Washington 98055, . Phone: 235-2550. Published: December 5, 1988 ,,ry.4 a, DEcLARATINVIRONM ENT *. LN APPLICATION NO. ECF-091-88 , R-091-88 , PP-091-88 APPLICANT OAKWOOD HOMES/UNION PLACE, PROPOSED ACTION APPLICANT SEEKS TO REZONE A 2 . 06 ACRE PARCEL FROM G-1, GENERAL USE, TO R-1, SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL USE, AND TO CREATE A TEN (10) LOT PRELIMINARY PLAT. GENERAL LOCATION AND/OR ADDRESS 763 UNION AVENUE N.E. POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (E.R.C.) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT WILL eig WILL NOT BE REQUIRED. THE CITY OF RENTON WILL NOT ACT ON THIS PROPOSAL FOR 15 DAYS FROM THE DATE BELOW. COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY DECEMBER 20; 1988 AN APPEAL OF THE ABOVE DETERMINATION MAY BE FILED WITH THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER BY 5:00 P.M., FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON PLANNING DIVISION AT 2 3 5-2 5 5 0. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION. ' . ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE 10:00 A.M. Renton Municipal Building November 30, 1988 3rd Floor Conference Room MINUTES ATTENDING: Ron Nelson, Building Director; Larry Springer, Planning Manager; Ken Nyberg, Acting Public Works Deputy Director; Don Erickson, Zoning Administrator; Glen Gordon, Fire Prevention; Jeannette Samek-McKague; and Margaret Pullar, Secretary. CALL TO ORDER: The meeting was called to order by Mr. Nelson. DISCUSSION - GENERAL P-1/P-9 VALLEY IMPROVEMENT/WETLAND IMPACT Mr. Springer advised he and Mr. Nyberg were to get a report from the technical team this afternoon at 2:00 PM. He will report the results at the next meeting. NEW PROJECTS OAKWOOD HOMES ECF; R; P-091-88 ' Applicant seeks to: 1) rezone 2.06 acres from G-1, General Use, to R-1, Single-Family Use; and 2) obtain a preliminary plat subdividing the parcel into ten (10) lots (minimum 7200 sq.ft. per lot) for future construction of a single-family development. Property is located at 763 Union Avenue N.E. Discussion: Mr. Erickson located the site and reviewed the proposal. Discussion followed regarding provision of access for adjacent property owner and on-site drainage system. Mr. Erickson indicated that there was no SEPA authority requiring this property owner to provide one lot for access to adjacent property for future development. However, TAC supports this recommendation with the vacant lot used for a "tot lot". Further discussion ensued about these issues. Decision: Mr. Springer made a motion, seconded by Mr. Nyberg, to issue a Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated and revising the recommended conditions by deleting No. 4 regarding open space for recreation on-site; retain No. 4 Note encouraging the developer to contribute funds to improve public recreation spaces but be specific about the type of improvements; be more specific on the type of improvements and change the wording so that the applicant is encouraged to provide these on-site and off-site improvements; delete No. 7 regarding provision of future vehicular access. The motion carried. SOUND AUTO ECF-113-88 Applicant seeks approval to expand an existing Sound Suzuki development. The proposed addition of approximately 5,000 sq. ft. is subject to environmental review under SEPA regulations. The project conforms to regulations established in the Zoning Ordinance for development in a Light Industrial zone; it is not subject to site plan review because the City does not require such review in the L-1 zone. The property is located at 750 Rainier Avenue South. Discussion; Mr. Erickson located the site and reviewed the proposal. He noted that the TAC meeting this morning resulted in the following issues being raised: 1) storm sewers; 2) a transmission line easement across the property front; 3) good opportunity to update landscaping and replace dead trees; and 4) improve signage. In addition, TAC recommended two additional conditions as follows: 1) install floor drains and oil/water separators; 2) require a $2,000 performance bond for landscaping. Dis'Cussion followed regarding these issues and the desirability of requiring that the service bay doors be closed during operating hours to mitigate noise to the adjoining community. � J " ERC Minutes November 30, 1988 Page 2 ' Decision: Mr. Nelson made a motion, seconded by Mr. Springer, to issue a Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated with the conditions recommended by Staff changing the wording of Item (b) so that the applicant understands that ERC is expecting the building addition design to be consistent with the design of the existing building; deleting .Item (d) regarding closing service bay doors; and adding two new items as recommended by TAC regarding floor drain and oil/water separators and landscaping performance bond. The motion carried. CEDAR VILLAGE ECF; SA-110-88 " Applicant seeks site approval for a 25 unit apartment building. Proposed project is consistent with R-3 zoning for property. Site is vacant and is located on A nacortes Avenue south of Sunset Blvd. Discussion: Ms. Blauman located the site and reviewed the'proposal including the site plan. She indicated that concern was expressed at TAC this morning regarding the density of the buildings and it was recommended that one building be removed from the plan. In addition, she noted that it was the recommendation from the TAC discussions that this application needs more information before a decision can be made. Mr. Erickson indicated that additional information is required regarding traffic impacts on the Anacortes/Sunset Boulevard intersection. He advised that a Determination of Significance could be issued pending the completion of a traffic analysis or the application could be deferred until' the analysis is complete and other required information is submitted. He stated that it seems that the responsibility has been shifting recently so that obtaining information has become a part of the mitigation conditions rather than waiting for any required information before formulating conditions. Mr. Springer discussed obtaining right-of-way dedication for future through street for•N.E., 12th. Decision: It was agreed to table any action of the application until the proponents submitted all of'the information noted in the staff report and to send a letter to the proponent asking that there be a right-of-way dedication as discussed. FORREST CRESTE APARTMENTS ECF; R; SA-093-88 Applicant proposes to'rezone the site from G-1 to R-3 and building approximately 200 apartment units on 11.73 acres. The property is located east of Duvall Avenue and south of Park Terrace, northeast corner of Duvall Avenue and S.E. 124th Street (extended).. SW10-23 N5E Discussion: Ms. Samek-McKague located the site and reviewed the proposal including 1) the possibility of a density trade-off for a desirable internal open space; 2) adjacent zoning and transition construction; and 3) future access to adjacent properties. Discussion followed regarding these issues in addition to the east/west road issue for 140th extended south. Decision: It was agreed that the project is not ready yet and action would be deferred until more information becomes available for review. PROJECT UPDATE ' Sunset Park Apartments - ECF: SA-048-88 Mr. Erickson reported that he met with the 'proponent, William Bechtold, yesterday regarding the 'reconsidered mitigated' conditions. He noted that the applicant will drop Building B from three stories to two stories,due to the shadow impacts and, according' to the recently ' reconsidered condition, reduce the setback from 30 to 25 feet for Building•C. He also noted that the proponent apparently is anxious to proceed with the office building in the B-1 zoning. Good Shepherd - ECF: R: SHPL: CU-015-88 Mr. Erickson advised that each person attending the meeting today was given a copy of the November 16, 1988 memo from the City Attorney regarding several issues involving the above noted project. Discussion followed with Mr. Erickson stating, as a result of opinions expressed in 'this memo, that SEPA regulations (Section 4-2822) need to be updated and any new ordinances need to automatically tie into these SEPA regulations and policies to keep things up to date. • ` ERC Minutes November 30, 1988 Page 3 RESPONSE TO CORRESPONDENCE With regard to the King County Waste Treatment Facility (recycling bins at the transfer station), Mr. Erickson noted that he met with Kathy Keolker yesterday. She gave him a copy of a Determination, issued by King County who has assumed lead agency status on .this project, with a comment period expiration date of today. Discussion followed and it was agreed that King County has the authority to assume lead agency status. It was agreed that Mr. Erickson contact other entities to determine if they had agreed to allow King County to be lead agency. It was also agreed that Mr. Erickson contact the Mayor's Office to see if the Determination had been sent there instead of the Planning Department. Decision: It was agreed to respond to King County in the following manner: 1) Mr. Erickson would check to see if due process and notification procedures were followed; 2) recommend that they apply for a 90 day temporary permit; and 3) list the conditions with which we anticipate they would have to comply. Mr. Nelson expressed his appreciation to Mr. Erickson for the EIS Update Report received today. He noted that the report is extremely helpful in reviewing the year's activities. MEETING ADJOURNED AT 11:15 AM • t• • 1 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE Audrey Benner RENTON,WASHINGTON ,being first duly sworn on oath states The Environmental Review Committee that he/she is the Chief Clerk of the (ERC) has issued a Determination of Non- Significance-Mitigated for the following pro- jects under the authority of the Renton VALLEY DAILY NEWS M ipal Code. OAKWOOD HOMES/UNION PLACE (ECF;R;PP-091-88) • Kent Edition • Renton Edition • Auburn Edition Applicant seeks to rezone a 2.06 acre par- cel from G-1, General Use, to R-1, Single- Daily newspapers published six (6) times a week.That said newspapers Family Residential Use,and to create a ten are legal newspapers and are now and have been for more than six l lot preliminary The property is located at 763 Union Ave N.E. months prior to the date of publication referred to,printed and published SOUND SUZUKI(ECF-113-88) in the English language continually as daily newspapers in Kent, King Applicant seeks approval to expand an existing Sound Suzuki development. The County,Washington.The Valley Daily News has been approved as a legal proposed addition of approximately 5000 newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for sq.ft. is subject to environmental review County. under SEPA regulations. The project con- King _forms to regulations established in the Zon- ing Ordinance for development in a Light The notice in the exact form attached,was published in the Kent Edition Industrial zone; it is not subject to site plan , Renton Edition X , Auburn Edition , (and not in review because the City does not require supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers such review in the L-1 zone. The property during the below stated period.The annexed notice a is locatedis decisiona 750 Rainier naAvenue South. This will be finalized in 15 days. Public Notice Written comments received after 5:00 p.m., December 20, 1988 will not be considered. was published on December !i , 1988 R5155 A fourteen(14)day appeal period will com- mence following the finalization of DNS-M. The mitigation measures imposed by the City of Renton's Environmental Review Committee are available at the Planning The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the Division of the Community Development Department, Municipal Building Renton, Sum of $ 3 0 _4 0 Washington 98055.Phone:235-2550. Published December 5, 1988 Valley Daily News R5155 Acct.#51067 Subscribed and sworn to before me this 1 9 thday of Da c 19 8 8 Nota ublic for the State of Washington, residing at Federal Way, King County, Washington. VDN#87 Revised 11/86 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE STAFF REPORT November 30, 1988 A. BACKGROUND: APPLICANT: Oakwood Homes, Inc./Steve Lusa PROJECT: Union Place (Rezone and Preliminary Plat) ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST: ECF; R; PP 091-88 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Applicant seeks to rezone a 2 . 06 acre parcel from G-1, General Use, to R-1, Single-Family Residential Use, and to create a ten (10) lot preliminary plat. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 763 Union Avenue N.E. E:L,),11,.I..1I I..1 . , . • JOc NE"1,in' :=iA � d w 1:, ' r. I sl' y�5\°1 1c1!4QIGI I'I``!I`I'/ a _. }.1 1 1 � L = t '1 t W 4 r'c•'.7\�� I n- _ sT \F� _ 4•• • , ,, r 1 0 ) S1 w tre ,40- b t .a- 9 u.r1.m*. n • 1 ' ...::. 11 1 ��1 L1 ' ♦> In • Ir le ZO® B o 5/ -Z�'ll.'" a,l.. 1, ..... ICI ry n i'\ 11, . .�SI 1' lc.\ ,`4/.,1 1 r I 'r r0131_I 4 3 .Il./1-1.111 r, •l laf./i II \'I. S a '1 ' 1 �l 51 •1111 . 0 _NEE 1 1 yam_ yi_ iMI ......... , —' LAUE -f 1 1 f i_it. [ • 'NI 'ITr ,1i.• , 1 I f' '.�a /O _-^r • 5T 1 ••�1Zt 3l1 �e� 1 , ;,,,.,1$. ,� , I,R- 1I Si 1 . a. ,� W4 2,, 1 1_ , i _0.•z Oro, J. --.- R- l _ • �' 1 .�u . '. `i • '\ • BARK -.. .__ • , • ,= r 1, 111 - ,I C,.1 • -' ;JJ ; , •/ I ,., h O N E Y DEW 1- _ g: -- 1 s� r ^` TARY SCHOOL!I t • e1 5� 1 1 1 - MIS t/11 11N 1 • { ; I ' I . ..I .:� �:_: , 1: c R-1 1— _,0 . R 011111 2 ,,,(-,,,,,,• . • I 5 i .1/ le !9 I.o .. ,*1,s ,,, s 110, •••:10... i ,,i- .1'. •E' •1151!1111 _f11. 1_I_f1 '\ 'r ' ' 2- - ..;4, R- 1 �l !rr...:;: lSk i R ....3 • . • • I _ -4a ,I. .l i �.1.i1 1!_l oa.i-11•1114.01. �..al.11• l��t� f .t /e • I 11•II I a1a1.1.1•Iwllj I ILA :-.. R—1 r I i Environmental Rey -:w Committee Staff Report Oakwood Homes, Inc. , Union Place Page 2 November 30, 1988 B. ANALYSIS 1. BACKGROUND: 2 . ISSUES: 1. Whether the proposed actions and subsequent development will have significant impacts upon circulation patterns on-site and on the adjacent public rights-of-way? The proposed rezone action does not directly affect local circulation patterns. However the design of the preliminary plat and the proposed future development plan for the property will constrain access to the property due, north of the subject site. , The estimated one hundred vehicular trips a day (50 round trips) from the proposed ten (10) single-family homes will impact traffic along Duvall Avenue N.E. Staff recommends that: a) An agreement be negotiated between the applicant and the owner of the property to the north of the subject site to provide access through this proposed subdivision (perhaps Lot #3 and/or #4) , if the property owner so desires. The plans for any access road should be subject to approval by the Traffic Engineer and the Fire Prevention Bureau. b) A plan be provided by the applicant to develop on-site signage and, perhaps, other safety devices (e.g. signalization, crosswalks) to improve safety for pedestrians and vehicles and to provide for efficient circulation. c) The applicant be required to participate in a TBID, for off-site improvements. 2 . Whether the proposed action and subsequent development will have significant light, glare and noise impacts on the site and/or _upon neighboring properties?, Staff believes that the subdivision and introduction of ten new single-family homes has the potential for some increase of light, glare and noise to the area which is currently zoned primarily as G-1 or R-1 and developed at a low level of density. Staff recommends that such impacts be addressed by mitigating measures which include, but are not limited to: a) Environmental Re :w Committee Staff Report 1 Oakwood Homes, Iriv. , Union Place Page 3 November 30, 1988 preservation of existing plant life to the greatest extent possible; b) provision of new landscaping and fencing to screen the site as necessary; and c) design of structures and access points to minimize glare and noise. 3 . Whether available public recreation areas are adequate to serve the subject proposed development? The subject property is located within approximately 150 feet of Kiwanis Park. Thus, adequate public recreation space is now available to the site. Staff urges the applicant to contribute to a City fund for improvement of public recreation space. Additionally, staff recommends that the applicant be required to develop on site open space recreation areas for children and adults anticipated to live in the proposed single-family residences. 4. Whether available public services/utilities and infrastructure are adequate to support the proposed subdivision and preliminary plat for future single-family development? Public services and infrastructure are available in the vicinity of the subject site. Utility lines are also in place. There is no storm drainage management plan. The applicant. should be required to install on-site and off-site improvements in conjunction with subdivision to meet Code regulations and to meet requirements established by Public Works and by the Fire Prevention Bureau of the City of Renton. C. RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff recommends that the Environmental Review Committee issue a Determination of Non-Significance - Mitigated - with the following conditions: 1. That the applicant provide trip assessment fees of $2 .37 per SVWDTE for off-site improvements, as well as on- site improvements to ensure safety and efficiency of access, subject to TBID requirements and approval by the Traffic Engineering Division. 2 . That the applicant provide a tree inventory and a tree preservation plan, for the site, subject to approval by the City's landscape planner. 3 . That the applicant provide a site plan for on-site landscaping and screening to mitigate noise, light and glare to and possibly from adjacent properties. Environmental Re rw Committee Staff Report Oakwood Homes, I:avo , Union Place Page 4 November 30, 1988 4. That the applicant provide open space for recreation on-site, with plans subject to approval by the landscape planner. Note: The applicant is encouraged to contribute to funds to improve the City's public recreation spaces. 5. That the applicant provide a storm drainage improvement plans subject to approval by the Public Works Department. 6. That the applicant provide for on- site and off-site improvements subject to approval by the Public Works Department. 7. That the applicant shall be required to provide an agreement with the owner of the property to the north of the subject site in which the applicant guarantees future vehicular access through this proposed subdivision, if the property owner so desires. • D. COMMENTS OF REVIEWING DEPARTMENTS: Various City departments have reviewed and commented upon the project. These comments are as follows: Police Department: No comment. Fire Prevention Bureau: Probable minor impact only. Design Engineering: Probable minor impact only. No objection to rezone. Traffic Engineering: Probable minor impact only. No objection to rezone. Utility Engineering: Probable minor impact only. Parks and Recreation: Building Division: Probable minor impact only. Current Planning Division: Long Range Planning: Proposed use is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. However, some environmental concerns are as follows: Homes adjacent to the street will be affected by the traffic noise, and the existing trees on site provide aesthetic amenities and should be retained where feasible. rr � • City of Renton Technical Advisory Committee MEETING NOTICE November 21, 1988 To: Nancy Laswell Morris Don Monaghan Steve Baima John.Morris Gary Norris Rick Stoddard From: Don Erickson, Chairman • Meeting Date: November 23, 1988 Time: 8:30 a.m. Location: Third Floor Conference Room • Agenda is attached below. TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE AGENDA November 23, 1988 Third Floor Conference Room Commencing at 8:30 a.m. TIME/KEY PARTICIPANTS NEW PROJECTS CEDAR VILLAGE ECF; SA-110-88 Applicant seeks site approval for a 25 unit apartment building. Proposed project consistent with R-3 zoning for property. Site is vacant. Property is located at approximately the 1200 block of Anacortes Avenue N.E. along the west side of the street. LOWE REZONE (BRANDT/JARVIS) ECF; R-104-88 Applicant seeks non-project rezone of subject property fro R-I to R-3 for future development of multi-family housing. Property is currently developed with single family residences. The proposed rezone conforms to the Comprehensive Plan Map. The property location is 909/951 Aberdeen Avenue N.E. Agenda November 21, 1988 Page 2 `c OAKWOOD HOMES ECF; R; PP-091-88 Applicant seeks to: 1) rezone 2.06 acres from G-1, General Use, to R-1, Single- Family Use; and 2) obtain a preliminary plat subdividing the parcel into ten (10) lots (minimum 7200 sq.ft. per lot) for future construction of a single-family development. Property is located at 763 Union Avenue N.E. RENTON TEMPORARY COURTHOUSE ECF; SA-099-88 Construction of a temporary structure to serve as a temporary courthouse for the City of Renton. Property location - Renton Municipal Building Campus. CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST NO. : ECF-091-88 APPLICATION NO(S) : R; PP-091-88 PROPONENT: Oakwood Homes, Inc./Steve Lusa DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Applicant seeks to rezone a 2. 06 acre parcel from G-1, General Use, to R-1, Single-Family Residential Use, and to create a ten (10) lot preliminary plat. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 763 Union Avenue N.E. LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton Community Development Department Planning Division The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43 .21C. 030 (2) (c) . Conditions were imposed as mitigation measures by the Environmental Review Committee under their authority of Section 4-2822 (D) Renton Municipal Code (see attached sheet) . These conditions are necessary to mitigate environmental impacts identified during the environmental review process. This DNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340 (2) . Because mitigation measures have been imposed, the lead agency will not act on this proposal for fifteen (15) days from December 5, 1988. Any interested party may submit written comments which must be submitted by 5: 00 p.m. , December 20, 1988, in order to be considered. A fourteen (14) day appeal period will commence following the finalization of the DNS. Responsible Official: Environmental Review Committee c/o Don Erickson, Zoning Administrator Planning Division Community Development Department 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 PUBLICATION DATE: December 5, 1988 DATE OF DECISION: November 30, 1988 SIGNATURES: NAM R nald G. Nelson 4 " nger` Building Off' is annin. lanage - en Nyb Acting u is W rks Director ti. DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED MITIGATION MEASURES PROJECT: Oakwood Homes/Union Place ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST: ECF-09.1-88 APPLICATION NUMBER: R; PP-091-88 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Applicant seeks to rezone a 2 . 06 acre parcel from G-1, General Use, to R-1, Single-Family Residential Use, and to create a ten (10) lot preliminary plat. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 763 Union Avenue N.E. RECOMMENDATIONS: Issue a Determination of Non- Significance-Mitigated with the following conditions: 1. That the applicant provide trip assessment fees of $2. 37 per AWDTE for off-site improvements, as well as on-site improvements to ensure safety and efficiency of access, subject to TBID requirements and approval by the Traffic Engineering Division. 2 . That the applicant provide a tree inventory and a tree preservation plan, for the site, subject to approval by the City's landscape planner. 3 . That the applicant provide a site plan for on-site landscaping and screening to mitigate noise, light and glare to and possibly from adjacent properties. 4. That the applicant provide a storm drainage improvement plan to mitigate against flooding and erosion subject to approval by the Public Works Department. In addition to the above, the applicant is encouraged to .contribute to funds to improve the City' s public recreation spaces in lieu of providing on-site recreational improvements. The applicant should meet with Parks and Recreation staff to discuss these. The applicant is also advised of the need to provide for on-site and off-site improvements (e.g. utility service lines, street lighting) subject to approval by the Public Works Department. mmdoc Mr . Don ErIcksen Dept . of Public Works Planning Div . 200 Mill at . S. Renton , Wash . 98055 Dear Mr . Erick_.en Re : Proj . # 88-262 Union Place Plat PP-c'91-88 Attached is a letter and a copy of a propose, su -division . The letter was sent by a engineering firm to Mr . Phil Barber , owner of the property adjacent to the proposed plat on the North side of the property. Mr . Barber and myself , John S. Mal gar i n i , a real estate broker , have been attempting to get in contact with the parties that have submitted the plat and have been unable to. They have requested input relating to the sub-division from Mr . Barber and I am attempting to respond for him as I am an interested party in this matter and would appreciate being listed as ' such . The way the plat is draw up , the property that Mr . Barber owns that is directly west of his home would become land-locked. There would be no way of developing the property owned by Mr . Barber as his home sits too close to the adjacent property on the north to allow ingress and egress to the back property from Union Ave . Mr .Barber is interested in developing that property. someday and there-by does not wish the property to become land-locked. Re-alignment of his house on the front of the property to permit possible access and development is not feasible at this time . As I stated previously, I would like to be listed as an interested party and receive all pertinent information relating to meetings or hearings that will involve this i sub-division . It is my intent to appear and testify as an interested party. Thanking you for an immediate response : Sincerely: John S. Malgarini Mr . Phil Barber 1058 Tacoma Ave . N.E 801 Union Ave N.E . Renton , Wash . 98056 Renton , Wash . 98056 PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF RENTON NOV 234988 111 E u u ( J • r CONSULTING ENGINEERING SERVICES Center Plaza West•Suite 360• 12655 S.W.Center St.•Beaverton,Oregon 97005-1601 •(503)646-4509 646-5436 610 Market Street•Suite 200•Kirkland, Washington 98033•(206) 827-6730 • • Resident/Property Owner 801 Union Avenue N.E. Renton, Washington 98055 October 20 , 1988 • Re: PP 091-88 (Proposed Plat of Union Place) • • Attached is a copy of the above proposed subdivision. This letter is in response to a request by the City of Renton for .us to inform you of our plans and seek input regarding your. plans • for your property. Please let us know what plans you have so we can review your development potential with respect to this application. Please call or write at your earliest convenience. • • John M. Godsey Jr. P.E. • f� " r.� r+� meµ- ;f 11f).f(i • :_• • • . , • • . ....).f• •\ • ...MINIIIMMENIMI• dIMMIONE/r • P.L C.L P.L L_I 16 (.._) > . Z1 MAX_ _I O._ .KIWANIS PARK &situ.TuRcuRe • 0 . • " AS NEEDED I 1 4' i2..--------77:‘ 162-32;4--°-:—:0-C.A.B.C.A.E. —7 4"A.C. CLASS'6' (two LIFTS) I D . - 1 607 /! . . \ \- I \ . . • '' .1 2 405 49'__•_.czCLa4lC_-i- .• .4"O20\1.--.-T--R.-E'E-S1'.Th1 f3.29 ) , '• . •i\\,\82_930. ,•• e. ..- 64.58 6 4T1 61 I (1 4010616 1 SSSTTT.. 45.-FP 9'C4 c!p 1 . TREES 1 .- 4 sd FT• i7421 0 FT 7346 SO FT 7315 SO ("4- ,___ F-1 z • I rr) w 0 .---------I/m . /-----1-. - a:a. flit nt i A2.7 . • • •7451 SO .S1.I -.., ,• L....1 g 5-1 . . . • Z ,. &tr.. 4/ — I . 1 w t w IF; PREPARED kft: w m ' 1 I I STEVE LUSA • ) t le. p Id • - 4 i N.E. 7th CT 7A-o 1 WOODINVILLE, WA. 98072 PHONE: 485-9090 a_ . < • , 1 763 z LI g i )- "ii i CC • :. 7437 SO — g obn 6 ...-- a a 5 5 ) CM 0 7698 SO FT 7337 SO FT g 7329 SO FT g 7492 SO j:g C'''' ej . Z • w = .2 ,-- ei.. .1, 4 1 ‘ii . 0 LIJ • ® ® .1. D) - to m TF,'S i .CJ .1■4.-400 P elE M . . • t 5 k,, 11.1 r, . It 1,1-' ••g SCALE: 1-=40' • . - ..---'. SHER . 751 , n • cr ALBE.T BALCHS RESIDENT P RK NO. 4 . - • 7 . . —,. . • I 1-172f7/te '12 ,..,A9112±_t=.--- - aLif , 0 pre ,(411 ,----N 4 .44 Lulto.. ._,_, • ,,7, 1 . .,, --..) ����,u� ����� ' `',err.( /Y+'1 ( -,g / (� i, , parA).-;f, � :_?( - r i, Re : Pro.j . # 88-262 Union Place Plat % PP-091-88 Attached is a letter and a copy of a proposed sub-di v i s_•i on . The letter was sent by a engineering -firm to Mr . Phil Barber , owner of the property adjacent to the proposed plat on the North side of the property . Mr . Barber and myself , John S. Mal gar i n i , a real fate broker , have been attempting to get in contact with the parties:;. that have submitted the plat and have been unable .to. They have requested input relating to the sub-division from Mr . Barber (r and I am attempting to respond for him as I am an interested party in this matter and would appreciate being listed as such . a ::;:1 :0 The way the plat is draw up , the property that Mr . Barber ,,, owns that is directly west of his home would become g, r land-locked. There would be no �. ay of developing the f., "' `r property owned by Mr . Barber as his home sits too close to r:.�� ;.; the adjacent property on the north to allow ingress and ,:;r; egress to the back property from Union Ave . Mr .Barber is • ;IA interested in developing that proper•ty. someday and there-by ' A does not wish the property to become land-locked. ;, :.'' Re-alignment of his house on the front of the property to •1.,1 permit possible access and development is not feasible at ) this time . `}i•',:: As I stated previously, I would 1 i we to be listed as an '' ;I interested party and receive al 1 pertinent information trelating to meetings or hearings that will involve this .:,. sub-division . It is my intent to appear and testify as an `� .if interested party . � % .t Thanking you for an immediate r•esFons_.e : . Sincerely : '4'�T'-.Y tu_. 5 . `>?--La.--Plet---)1.--,---t-t-,- aa jh •;frc' / ( John S. Mal gar• i n i Mr . F'h i 1 Barber L' 1058 Tacoma Ave . N.E 801 Union Ave N.E. Renton , Wash . 98056 Renton , Wash . 98056 • `:;; PLANNING DIVISION. CITY OF RENTON ..', `. D NOV 2 3,1988 'J: gifrOarini USAgon 1880s r 1058 'Tacoma Ave. ga. Pf,ik 1- 1v/ s�- E Benton, `WTI 98056 ° oD ;iraI EE'-0r.Y 22 v V y9►� ,.'1"i •;R� (`1F;lF`e�ilnalliE - • :Mr. Don Ericksen Dept . Of P .W. Planning, Div. City of Renton, 200 Mill So . Renton, Wash. 98055 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE STAFF REPORT November 30, 1988 ' A. BACKGROUND: • APPLICANT: Oakwood Homes, Inc./Steve Lusa PROJECT: Union Place (Rezone and Preliminary Plat) ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST: ECF; R; PP 091-88 • DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Applicant seeks to rezone a 2. 06 acre parcel from G-1, General Use, to R-1, Single-Family Residential Use, and to create a ten (10) lot preliminary plat. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL; 763 Union Avenue N.E. • ..1..7.1..F.1..I..1 .-i . lairg-',1,"'4,,, I11Q • .., '-W fir_ rI o c , 4111? ' T -- ---- ------- E 111'J Sl �1 1'1 ' tUI .(,.I"yS ,' 1"�' ,".� I 1 1 ll,�Illyr/ j1. • t f/ _' I11\ 't 5^ 4lti\✓)- 1l_112"l 51'1 . f.. 0- 1' 4•.4O b • A_ 9 U.H TG IA tl o ..1. 1 ■•M . • ''1 • rl . 1� . 'J 1 S N F.�, raj!, \L . 41 r +�)3 �V �T2 'VE 0 _ aIII' •1 11 IL, ' i�/ t v.� �W rr'� r r 1•t 't_Nl 1.ht,3 b ��■,1!1t�t'�' ♦• i. It 11 a. ,i It r • .I ' ��F L N E 1 1. 4 1e • . �, 'b 0 likl [j of• J, I G 'NCI. - �I1 10_2 •I-P ,?b'F� I a—1 _ ( o. .1 .t • r C�IT- s I 144.. 3' eT. o ., i Vr! �1' � CT .! , •'1®b _Lr. . _ 4St'. slt 3.i' •17 • • IV rr a'� < .• rt�� ' dJy,f. 4 \ - t • '•S1� 16 5.�/,1ii' 1 re1101.3 C r a 4 J •1 .11.r lrt I el aldf./i II T� ��I77 1 > _L__\'I. f �; I �Ir r. s •I t' t . o'•c. _�_ 10'- y T liiL . [. 11 I, [iftj:i4iI' •.. ..11,J' '4jj �w 1 111 t . ST 1 .•7. ----— .— * a.�-: .Izl '#:' Z� .. ' b ,CP 4 Kli.n/ANIS El- :L. v ' a • '� 7 • ...ii . c f 1 n ' , ! I w hOhle Y out/ 9� ` lata r. T- 1 SCHOOL cilARK t ^. , / (Rrt i ELEMENTARY . r 7.l 1_'�mil% ,, : .'l 1 a r~ -5 • 9 Ibile. —, I' I 1 .. as�a - .i. — • --_ 1 . s b I7 1e ! '10 n I.t I) .7 '' ! gT , _ I -- it i .t/11�9 ,',r E :• . ;: ...I ;, �. ti . t .i• I , R-i I _l. H� N r ,•. 1 .r r I •.;.I ::'1 .I ..,I. 1. 7• ' 1 •t l N E 1,1 71•1 4. ..�1 _ -_ 'S)J �L s- I II, `` 4 �l• l� R - 2 • ! I r r , ., I.o .t ,.! l• .•t •� I 1 1.1n•r1.1..ir.n.. 1 , I• .� �� ., / , :.' ''f a .f [� � _�11 LLI_, r r .J•. 1 ti•Y.4�,. r. .• z_ .• •• ,� ••— R-G I • ' o-•" Er rt ;9 . 'GA " -- . 0 . » . I :i' l l .I F y .. ..u i l tr ..i"J I,4 �'I 1'.r•',. • ' A* .9-0 .. 1 a 1.... ,. It _ . $ —1:--- --R ...3 ±Ji11 I.i •+ 8: IIII 1 j1., • ..r�,.t.�1elr.I.fOdl.�.al.11,�.1'.aI..11i..IleL11 I. Ul \ . •r • O iiii t T• -• R—i 11�Ie li l'la •r r\ .J r R-' ,1. ; L-' _' fl 1 I ,0% a ' Environmental Re :w Committee Staff Report Oakwood Homes, Inc. , Union Place Page 2 November 30, 1988 B. ANALYSIS 1. BACKGROUND: 2 . ISSUES: 1. Whether the proposed actions and subsequent development will have significant impacts upon circulation patterns on-site and on the adiacent public rights-of-way? The proposed rezone action does not directly affect local circulation patterns. However the design of the preliminary plat and the proposed future development plan for the property will constrain access to the property due north of the subject site. , The estimated one hundred vehicular trips a day (50 round trips) from the proposed ten (10) single-family homes will impact traffic along Duvall Avenue N.E. Staff recommends that: a) An agreement be negotiated between the applicant and the owner of the property to the north of the subject site to provide access through this proposed subdivision (perhaps Lot #3 and/or #4) , if the property owner so desires. The plans for any access road should be subject to approval by the Traffic Engineer and. the Fire Prevention Bureau. b) A plan be provided by the applicant to develop on-site signage and, perhaps, other safety devices (e.g. signalization, crosswalks) to improve safety for pedestrians and vehicles and to provide for efficient circulation. c) The applicant be required to participate in a TBID, for off-site improvements. 2 . Whether the proposed action and subsequent development will have significant light, glare and noise impacts on the site and/or upon neighboring properties? Staff believes that the subdivision and introduction of ten new single-family homes has the potential for some increase of light, glare and noise to the area which is currently zoned primarily as G-1 or R-1 and developed at a low level of density. Staff recommends that such impacts be addressed by mitigating measures which include, but are not limited to: a) Environmental Re :la Committee Staff Report Oakwood Homes, I�.... , Union Place Page 3 November 30, 1988 preservation of existing plant life to the greatest extent possible; b) provision of new landscaping and fencing to screen the site as necessary; and c) design of structures and access points to minimize glare and noise. 3 . Whether available public recreation areas are adequate to serve the subject proposed development? The subject property is located within approximately 150 feet of Kiwanis Park. Thus, adequate public recreation space is now available to the site. Staff urges the applicant to contribute to a City fund for improvement of public recreation space. Additionally, staff recommends that the applicant be required to develop on site open space recreation areas for children and adults anticipated to live in the proposed single-family residences. 4. Whether available public services/utilities and infrastructure are adequate to support the proposed subdivision and preliminary plat for future single-family development? Public services and infrastructure are available in the vicinity of the subject site. Utility lines are also in place. There is no storm drainage management plan. The applicant should be required to install on-site and off-site improvements in conjunction with subdivision to meet Code regulations and to meet requirements established by Public Works and by the Fire Prevention Bureau of the City of Renton. C. RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff recommends that the Environmental Review Committee issue a Determination of Non-Significance - Mitigated - with the following conditions: 1. That the applicant provide trip assessment fees of $2 .37 per SVWDTE for off-site improvements, as well as on- site improvements to ensure safety and efficiency of access, subject to TI3ID requirements and approval by the Traffic Engineering Division. 2 . That the applicant provide a tree inventory and a tree preservation plan, for the site, subject to approval by the City's landscape planner. 3 . That the applicant provide a site plan for on-site landscaping and screening to mitigate noise, light and glare to and possibly from adjacent properties. , Environmental Re ;w Committee Staff Report Oakwood Homes, Union Place Page 4 November 30, 1988 4. That the applicant provide open space for recreation on-site, with plans subject to approval by the landscape planner. Note: The applicant is encouraged to contribute to funds to improve the City's public recreation spaces. . 5. That the applicant provide a storm drainage improvement plans subject to approval by the Public Works Department. 6. That the applicant provide for on- site and off-site improvements subject to approval by the Public Works Department. 7. That the applicant shall be required to provide an agreement with the owner of the property to the north of the subject site in which the applicant guarantees future vehicular access through this proposed subdivision, if the property owner so desires. • D. COMMENTS OF REVIEWING DEPARTMENTS: Various City departments have reviewed and commented upon the project. These comments are as follows: Police Department: No comment. Fire Prevention Bureau: Probable minor impact only. Design Engineering: Probable minor impact only. No objection to rezone. Traffic Engineering: Probable minor impact only. . No objection to rezone. Utility Engineering: Probable minor impact only. Parks and Recreation: Building Division: Probable minor impact only. Current Planning Division: Long Range Planning: Proposed use is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. However, some environmental concerns are as follows: Homes adjacent to the street will be, affected by the traffic noise, and the existing trees on site provide aesthetic amenities and should be retained where feasible. City of Renton Environmental Review Committee MEETING NOTICE NOVEMBER 28, 1988 To: Larry Springer Mike Parness Ken Nyberg Ron Nelson • Glen Gordon From: Don Erickson, Secretary Meeting Date: November 30, 1988 Time: 10:00 AM Location: Third Floor Conference Room Agenda attached below. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA NOVEMBER 30, 1988 Third Floor Conference Room Commencing at 10:00 AM • TIME/KEY PARTICIPANTS DISCUSSION P-1/P-9 VALLEY IMPROVEMENT/WETLAND IMPACT -- STATUS REPORT NEW PROJECTS OAKWOOD HOMES ECF; R; P-091-88 Applicant seeks to: 1) rezone 2.06 acres from G-1, General Use, to R-1, Single-Family Use; and 2) obtain a preliminary plat subdividing the parcel into ten (10) lots (minimum 7200 sq.ft. per lot) for future construction of a single-family development. Property is located at 763 Union Avenue N.E. Environmental Review Committi Y } Meeting Notice and Agenda 10:00 AM, Third Floor Conference Room November 30, 1988 Page 2 AQUIFER PROTECTION ECF-114-88 Applicant seeks approval f r an Aquifer Protection Ordinance to pro ect aqu' ers from contamination by regulated subs :nces This Ordinance establishes aquifer protection .re..; regulation for land uses within aquifer prote ion area; construction, inspection and moni . ing standards for new and existing regulated bs nce facilities; uniform standards for rele,se rep rting, emergency response, substance manag•ment p1a•ning, closure and abandonments, :nd enforce •nt; and permit procedures. GARNER • - ECF;PP:V;R 74-88 Applicant see to: rezone 2.4 acre parcel of property from -1 General Use, to R-1, Single- Family Use; 2 cr e a preliminary plat with ten (10) lots of mini of 7200 sq.ft. per lot; 3) obtain variances to low a) a pipestem access to Lot 9, and b) t e pro sed access road and emergency ve icle turn ound. The property is located at 19 Union Avenue. • SOUND STORES ECF-113-88 Applicant seeks approval to expand an existing Sound Suzuki development. The proposed addition of approximately 5,000 sq.ft. is subject to environmental review under SEPA regulations. The project conforms to regulations established in the Zoning Ordinance for development in a Light Industrial zone; it is not subject to site plan review because the City does not require such review in the L-1 zone. The property is located at 750 Rainier Avenue South. CEDAR VILLAGE ECF;SA-110-88 Applicant seeks site approval for a 25 unit apartment building. Proposed project is consistent with R-3 zoning for property. Site is vacant. Property is located at 4415 NE Sunset Blvd. C2�'/2 City of Renton Technical Advisory Committee MEETING NOTICE November 21, 1988 To: Nancy Laswell Morris Don Monaghan Steve Baima John Morris Gary Norris Rick Stoddard From: Don Erickson, Chairman Meeting Date: November 23, 1988 Time: 8:30 a.m. Location: Third Floor Conference Room • Agenda is attached below. TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE AGENDA November 23, 1988 Third Floor Conference Room Commencing at 8:30 a.m. TIME/KEY PARTICIPANTS NEW PROJECTS CEDAR VILLAGE ECF; SA-110-88 Applicant seeks site approval for a 25 unit apartment building. Proposed project consistent with R-3 zoning for property. Site is vacant. Property is located at approximately the 1200 block of Anacortes Avenue N.E. along the west side of the • street. LOWE REZONE (BRANDT/JARVIS) ECF; R-104-88 Applicant seeks non-project rezone of subject property fro R-1 to R-3 for future development of multi-family housing. Property is currently developed with single family residences. The proposed rezone conforms to the Comprehensive Plan Map. The property location is 909/951 Aberdeen Avenue N.E. • M Agenda November 21, 1988 Page 2 OAKWOOD HOMES ECF; R; PP-091-88 Applicant seeks to: 1) rezone 2.06 acres from G-1, General Use, to R-1, Single- Family Use; and 2) obtain a preliminary plat subdividing the parcel into ten (10) lots (minimum 7200 sq.ft. per lot) for future construction of a single-family development. Property is located at 763 Union Avenue N.E. RENTON TEMPORARY COURTHOUSE ECF; SA-099-88 Construction of a temporary structure to serve as a temporary courthouse for the City of Renton. Property location - Renton Municipal Building Campus. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT • TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE STAFF REPORT November 23, 1988 A. BACKGROUND: APPLICANT: Oakwood Homes, Inc./Steve Lusa PROJECT: _ Union Place (Rezone and Preliminary Plat) ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST: ECF; R; PP 091-88 . DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Applicant seeks to rezone 2. 06 acre parcel from G-1, General Use, to R-1, Single-Family Residential Use, and to create a ten (10) lot preliminary plat. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 763 Union Avenue N.E. • • •1r`T _� w 19 � I " el,o1.,lei. t11213 4llloI,/e I E IaniT O N E II IN .1. ■ _ • i £ Z t 1\ t �au �• 5ST\rel ., �� I Ill" 5T i� �.'. • , t t, . -QW I. 4 .�'y043.b yn ,d F 9. IL H ,OIp ti \Y` _. ,„. E Ior_ c , 111' I I IV I • � w =• -r-1.1 s l___I_I 1_ � •sT, -1 Ix N, I.NL,1� I , 1 �. . .j IL el V.:•I> ' r -"' - • z o s5 ,. rInd' I ells ., r• ui" ,: ,r:� 11 V L �^-ur�:> Io _ 1 le ® Ei ..I,z' �;W .1 - ^-33r` 9 N E IUr?. "_ la .. I! ' i O �ar" /.; I _ r IQ_ . ' 3 pl. . g > 1 %. S t ` CT u 1 1�®D•* - 1- 2 a a �1JIIIo I z 3.ic..;> a e w it i' L I. 6 4/.3-riT�l „lla 9 1 ri4 J ./I./'..I,a 1. a :a a al lip - .w::••. +L , T_. I• _ LANE :'•f 1 �- �; -- L [ • .,_ l - • •111 .tom .,�w� ��a�1 fd II __ .. til:$ .;:d pp..,c ' • 7 •T•17::::1 p 1 i —7---- I,.to 4 I •I{ .. ,,.`',. ' H. __ I ".I N ' • i. • .z !• :., - IIWSIVilik.lib 1 . , r ff 1 „ 6_y Cr , 1. . .. `.-r.,:_�4.l 1. Z� �!. ,, • 4 ' KI'Iv./AN 1 S - — �— ,. _ • ! t.,.. , • r .•• PARK ol�c ® I ; • • r �" '' e*�J•I. n �..... :. ! • I w hONEY DEW E ` ' ' +1 ELEMENTARY SCHOOL A � ,';. E5iI& lIt I I 5T ? / • , t I R _i' I N E• "T _ 1 I 1 I 6, r---. _ R `42 -0 1''•I 1 N E Jr+ 5�`T I 'n' .i: ... 2 ...,_]• ,, , .. , I. ,, ,.. .. .i .3 .4 ilk i i .7, ,..,; .1.. .'HI ; IT `--Nr-E. I T ,171.•' s;\ j.9%- \• ;I?O .. �•r ..' R_1 R-2 1 ' gl ! '� II t1,! 1 I. ,'lol �; • • filn" .lf,: ._ ..ei I 1 I '-• ':;. , f .,I,N-'O + • z® re ", .Ia�,I=,1�)f ._1 �.. 1 1.�f.1 . b - 'r' w 4.1... om" __r. ----_R _3 N7I�',1�]!1',llII. ��;:,t }f I-I•I r-�,�;., .,1 1_ ' . tit 1 �•a i.T�.'I,.Igl,�lol..�t�Od.1 y,.al.L,I. Ill,;t•Ill xl:. , • "q 4; 'l) , • r e•• o .er'-re' -_•_ . I. 111 fill l_• .:..,' Q ,.i i; I—r— N !m1n1JiH1I IR-1 i R-1 — r.. L... _ i1. Technical Advisor Committee Staff Report Oakwood Homes, Inc. -Union Place Page 2 November 23, 1988 B. ISSUES: (LAND USE) 1. Whether the proposed preliminary platting action conforms to requirements set by Renton's Subdivision Code? The proposed action does conform to the Subdivision Code. Note: The Public Works Department has requested that the application be amended to include drawings which depict all existing street improvements and which provide current street names. 2. Whether the proposed action is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan? The proposed rezone and preliminary plat conform to the Comprehensive Plan which designates the property for single- family residential use. The proposed rezone to R-1 would allow single-family residential development with minimum lot • size of 7,200 square feet, as opposed to the 35, 000 square foot lot size required with the existing G-1, General Use zone. 3 . Whether the proposed action is consistent with current utilization of the subject parcel and neighboring properties? . The subject parcel is presently developed with a single-family home and a garage. There are several dominant trees on the site as well. The applicant intends to demolish the existing structure and to clear approximately 38% of the site of all vegetation in order to facilitate future development. Staff supports the demolition of the existing structures; however, the applicant should be required to submit a plan which inventories all trees and which provides for retention of all significant trees on the site. Properties in the area of the site are vacant or developed with single-family homes similar in size and character to the type of development which the applicant intends to propose for this site following approval of the rezone and preliminary plat action. 4. Whether available public services/utilities and infrastructure are adequate to support the proposed subdivision and preliminary plat for future single-family development? Public services and infrastructure are available in the vicinity of the subject site. The applicant should be required Technical Advise; Committee Staff Report Oakwood Homes, lird. -Union Place Page 3 November23 , 1988 to install on-site and off-site improvements in conjunction with subdivision to meet Code regulations and to meet requirements established by Public Works and by the Fire Prevention Bureau of the City of Renton. (ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS) 1. Whether the proposed actions and subsequent development will have significant impacts upon circulation patterns on-site and on the adjacent public rights-of-way? The proposed rezone action does not directly affect local circulation patterns. However the design of the preliminary plat and the proposed future development plan for the property will constrain access to the property due north of the subject site. The estimated forty (40) trips a day from the proposed ten (10) single-family homes will impact traffic along Duvall Avenue N.E. Staff recommends that: a) a traffic impact study be provided by the applicant including an inventory of generated trips, a description of resulting impacts to the site and to neighboring properties, and a plan for mitigation of these impacts; b) an agreement be negotiated between the applicant and the owner of the property to the north of the subject site to provide access through this proposed subdivision, if the property owner so desires. c) a plan be provided by the applicant to develop on-site signage and, perhaps, other safety devices (e.g. signalization, crosswalks,) to improve safety for pedestrians and vehicles and to provide for efficient circulation. d) the applicant be required to participate in a TBID, for off-site improvements. 2. Whether the proposed action and subsequent development will have significant light, glare and noise impacts on the site and/or upon neighboring properties? Staff believes that the subdivision and introduction of ten new single-family homes has the potential for some increase of light, glare and noise to the area which is currently zoned primarily as G-1 or R-1 and developed at a low level of density. Staff Technical Advisc; Committee Staff Report Oakwood Homes, Inc. -Union. Place Page 4 November 23, 1988 recommends that such impacts be addressed by mitigating measures which include, but are not limited to: a) preservation of existing plant life to the greatest extent possible; b) provision of new landscaping and fencing to screen the site as necessary; and c) design of structures and access points to minimize light, glare and noise. C. RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff recommends that the Environmental Review Committee issue a Determination• of Non-Significance - Mitigated - with the following conditions: 1. That the applicant provide a traffic analysis as required by the Traffic Engineering Division; 2. That the applicant provide trip assessment fees for off-site improvements, as well as on-site improvements to ensure safety and efficiency of access, subject to TBID requirements and approval by the Traffic Engineering Division. 3. That the applicant provide a tree inventory and a tree preservation plan, for the site, subject to approval by the City's landscape planner. 4. That the applicant provide a project design and a plan for on-site landscaping and screening to mitigate noise, light and glare to adjacent ,. properties. Note: The applicant shall be required to provide an agreement with the owner of the property to the north of the subject site in which the applicant guarantees . access through this proposed subdivision, if the property owner so desires. D. COMMENTS OF REVIEWING DEPARTMENTS: Various City departments have reviewed and commented upon the project. These comments are as follows: Police Department: Land Use: Approved. Fire Prevention Bureau: Land Use: Any development and/or construction shall comply with current Fire and Building Codes and Ordinances. Preliminary fire flow calculations show a ..fire flow of 1000 per residential structure is required. One (1)` hydrant(s) with a minimum flow of 1000 gpm each is required. Maximum distance to structure is 300 feet. Primary hydrant is required to be within 300 feet of the structure. Secondary hydrants are required to be within 600 feet hydrant spacing of the structure. All fire department access roads are to be paved and installed prior to Technical Adviso Committee Staff Report Oakwood Homes, Imo..-.. -Union Place Page 5 November 23, 1988 construction. All fire hydrants are required to be installed and approved prior to construction. Design Engineering: Land Use: Not approved. The following items are needed: legal description, detailed plan and profile showing off site improvements, surveyor's name and stamp on the plat, and need reference points on plat. Additionally, some street names are incorrect, typical road section does not include any sidewalks, and need to revise typical road section as shown with percent etc. Traffic Engineering: Land Use: Not approved. A traffic impact study is required noting generated trips, any impacts, and any mitigation measures to be included in the project. Mitigation fee at $2.37 per generated trip will be assessed at 50% of trips for NE 4th signal coordination. Provide street sign at entrance to the development (i.e. NE 7th Ct. ) , and provide a stop sign at the exit from the development. • Utility Engineering: Land Use: Rezone only is approved. Fees are due for a water latecomer, and system development charges for water as well as sewer. Parks and Recreation: Land Use: Building Division: Land Use: Approved with conditions. City street names should be used on the Plat. Current Planning Division: Land Use: Long Range Planning: Land Use: Approved with conditions. Applicant should submit a tree preservation plan to the Planning Department for review and approval. Mitigation measures to reduce noise problems for the homes located adjacent to the street should be provided. 0 CITY OF RENTON lei/ DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor PLANNING DIVISION November 7, 1988 Steve Lusa c/o John Godsey 12655 S.W. Center Beaverton, Oregon 97005 • Re: Oakwood Homes, 763 Union Avenue N.E. ECF;R;PP 091-88 Dear Mr. Lusa: The Community Development Department has formally accepted the above referenced application. It has been routed for departmental review and is tentatively scheduled for the Technical Advisory Committee on November 23, 1988 for consideration. If you have any questions regarding the scheduling of this project, please contact our • office at 235-2550. • ely, • • Dona d K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator DKE/lb:mjp cc: Philip R. Barber 801 Union Avenue N.E. Renton, Washington 98055 • 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2550 RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPAId E ', �4` ' ��/�,� ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEE"i' a? 44'* REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: a\ Recrea-l- Of 4P DATE CIRCULATED: 11/3/88 COMMENTS DUE: 11 17 88 0 ECF-091-88 APPLICATION NO(S) : R;PP 091-88 PROPONENT: Steve Lusa/Oakwood Homes PROJECT TITLE: Oakwood Homes/Union Place BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks to: 1) rezone 2 . 06 acres from G-1, General Use to R-1, Single-Family Use; and 2) obtain a preliminary pla subdividing the parcel into ten (10) lots (minimum 7200 square feet per lot for future construction of a single-family development. LOCATION: 763 Union Avenue N.E. SITE AREA 2. 06 acres BUILDING AREA (gross) : N/A IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth ° ° o ° 2 . Air ° ° ° o ° 0 3 . Water ° ° ° o ° ° 4. Plants ° o ° ° 5. Animals ° ° ° ° ° 6. Energy & Natural Resources ° ° ° o ° ° 7. Environmental Health ° o ° ° 8. Land & Shoreline Use ° o ° ° 9. Housing ° ° o ° ° 10. Aesthetics ° ° o ° ° 11. Light & Glare ' ° ° ° o ° ° 12 . Recreation X ° ° o ° 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation .° • ° o ° ° 14 . Transportation o ° o ° ° 15. Public Services ° ° 0 o ° ° — 16. Utilities ° ° COMMENTS: BUD Cv,/,ff e.c c 41.‘47,114(-74—0"—. #L.7‘c-4- -;`"C ..,4*freir.6.1.- G��rele O</r Q07t(f-k-- r�i'cc/c� b� G %'v``o� 741-ad heed Gl eediro ev7- We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or are where 'tion information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Sig ure of Director or Authorized Representative Da e Rev. 6/88 U. r. RENTON (c:..aMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPART -NT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 091-88 APPLICATION NO(S) . : _R; PP 091-88 PROPONENT: Steve Lusa/Oakwood Homes PROJECT TITLE: Oakwood Homes/Union Place BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:_Applicant seeks to obtain: 1) a rezone of 2 . 06 acres from G-1, General Use to R-1, Single-Family Use; and 2) a preliminary plat of ten (10) lots of a minimum of 7200 square feet per lot to be developed at a future date with single-family residences. LOCATION: 763 Union Avenue N.E. TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: /�`P / � G`�-� �p r APPROVED KAPPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED cceffedegi O'Crt lfeG,ece vi..46•/e?older-0#,, DATE // /O �� SIGNATURE IRECTOR AUTHOR ED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 6/88 RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPAxuAENT 15 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SH �- 0 �.r,/0 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: �oAs J pia /,�.1 ® ' DATE CIRCULATED: 11/3/88 COMMENTS DUE: 11/17/868 �Cs' /� /I�98a' `: ECF-091-88 4 APPLICATION NO(S) : R;PP 091-88 PROPONENT: Steve Lusa/Oakwood Homes PROJECT TITLE: Oakwood Homes/Union Place BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks to: 1) rezone 2 . 06 acres from G-1, General Use to R-1, Single-Family Use; and 2) obtain a preliminary pla subdividing the parcel into ten (10) lots (minimum 7200 square feet per lot for future construction of a single-family development. LOCATION: 763 Union Avenue N.E. SITE AREA 2 . 06 acres BUILDING AREA (gross) : NL IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth ° ° o ° ° 2 . Air '?(.. ° ° o ° ° 3 . Water ° 7' ° ° o ° ° 4 . Plants ° ex 0 ° o 0 ° 5. Animals ° ' ° ° ° 6. Energy & Natural Resources ° o ° ° 7. Environmental Health )4f, ° o ° ° 8 . Land & Shoreline Use 0 7K ° 9 . Housing ° 7< ° ° o ° ° 10. Aesthetics x ° ° ° 11. Light & Glare ° o ° ° 12. Recreation < ° ° o ° ° 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation X ° ° O ° 14. Transportation X ° ° o O ° 15. Public Services ° '( 0 0 ° 16. Utilities x 0 ° COMMENTS: A/O 44e.c7/ - -7LD in Piz 0�Le., We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or are where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Director or Authoriiid Representative Date Rev. 6/88 • V. RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPAR__._NT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 091-88 APPLICATION NO(S) . : R; PP 091-88 PROPONENT: Steve Lusa/Oakwood Homes PROJECT TITLE: Oakwood Homes/Union Place BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks to obtain: 1) a rezone of 2 . 06 acres from G-1, General Use to R-1, Single-Family Use; and 2) a preliminary plat of ten (10) lots of a minimum of 7200 square feet per lot to be developed at a future date with single-family residences. LOCATION: 763 Union Avenue N.E. TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: _ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON • REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: driee.Yil APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS /` NOT APPROVED /7.,eme "et je<5;"e:34.0-- a. e C. V�� 7rifafv J ,4 --4?'°-0)Z-- (46 4eti - (-1 te-a'i Xo‘, DATE //— SI NATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 6/88 C y% RENTON 'COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPAB'rN, ' 4D OA,g,�®* ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW S �v' �.7 "�Ip,O4y 8� ti REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: i y-a- ic, ei 64 DATE CIRCULATED: 11/3/88 COMMENTS DUE: 11/17/88 ve D ECF-091-88 APPLICATION NO(S) : R;PP 091-88 PROPONENT: Steve Lusa/Oakwood Homes PROJECT TITLE: Oakwood Homes/Union Place BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks to: 1) rezone 2 . 06 acres from G-1, General Use to R-1, Single-Family Use; and 2) obtain a preliminary .pla subdividing the parcel into ten (10) lots (minimum 7200 square feet per lot , for future construction of a single-family development. LOCATION: 763 Union Avenue N.E. SITE AREA 2 . 06 acres BUILDING AREA (gross) : N/A IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth ✓ ° ° ° 2 . Air ° ° ° 3 . Water I/ ° ° ° V ° ° °4 . Plants ° ° ✓ ° ° 5. Animals ° ° ° o ° ° 6. Energy & Natural Resources ° 7 . Environmental Health s/ 0 ° ° ° 8. Land & Shoreline Use I/ °° ° o ° ° 9 . Housing 1/ ° . 10 . Aesthetics t/ ° ° 11. Light & Glare 0 ✓ ° ° o / ° ° 12 . Recreation ..1 ° ° 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ° (/ ° ° ° 14. Transportation s/ ° ° o ° ° 15. Public Services %.1/� ° ° o / ° ° 16. Utilities ��// ° ° COMMENTS: We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or are where additional 'nfc rmation is needed to properly assess thisJ roposal. 4-a.4 Signature of D'ir `'t r or Authorized Representative Da e Rev. 6/88 RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPART_AT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 091-88 APPLICATION NO(S) . : R; PP 091-88 PROPONENT: Steve Lusa/Oakwood Homes PROJECT TITLE: Oakwood Homes/Union Place BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:_Applicant seeks to obtain: 1) a rezone of 2 . 06 acres from G-1, General Use to R-1, Single-Family Use; and 2) a preliminary plat of ten (10) lots of a minimum of 7200 square feet per lot to be developed at a future date with single-family residences. LOCATION: 763 Union Avenue N.E. TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED. HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: /r4gc APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS K NOT APPROVED 1/ ffi 1,f ma's-'2 l s " �f �/� eL 1�,i a y Q st,r ,4-17i 23 .^�ecas�.vCs _/ 4e _ 11 e r� Q oft ee. 2-3 2er e� .�r� cf-kl 4,3-;a. 2 R ' / de,vely7,-,e4 eocieV) z- p(Ditje 519 S'J'` 4 em ✓eloc,e: 6 2./1 DATE / / ,- SIGNATURE dF gCTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE y REV. 6/88 I REMAJB COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DErrtRTMENT C '�/ ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHE yok ���C 40/Ls REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: lalkiLtC �1 61 N DATE CIRCULATED: 11/3/88 COMMENTS DUE:_11/17/88 r n, so ' t // ECF-091-88 APPLICATION NO(S) : R;PP 091-88 PROPONENT: Steve Lusa/Oakwood Homes PROJECT TITLE: Oakwood Homes/Union Place BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks to: 1) rezone 2 .06 acres from G-1, General Use to R-1, Single-Family Use; and 2) obtain a preliminary pla subdividing the parcel into ten (10) lots (minimum 7200 square feet per lot for future construction of a single-family development. LOCATION: 763 Union Avenue N.E. SITE AREA 2 . 06 acres BUILDING AREA (gross) : N/A IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth ° ° ° 2 . Air ° ° ° 3 . Water ° ° 4 . Plants ° ° ° 5. Animals ° ° ° 6. Energy & Natural Resources - ° ° 7. Environmental Health ° ° 8 . Land & Shoreline Use ° O ° 9. Housing ° ° ° ° 10. Aesthetics ° ° ° 11. Light & Glare ° ° o ° ° 12 . Recreation ° ° o ° ° 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ° O ° ° 14 . Transportation ° o ° ° 15. Public Services ° ° 16. Utilities ° ° COMMENTS: We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or are where add' 'onal inform ion is needed to properly assess this proposal. /7i-7Z%. -Yor Sig re of Director or Authorized Representative Date ' P Rev. 6/88 RENTI_. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEI_=_PMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 091-88 APPLICATION NO(S) . : R; PP 091-88 PROPONENT: Steve Lusa/Oakwood Homes PROJECT TITLE: Oakwood Homes/Union Place BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:_Applicant seeks to obtain: 1) a rezone of 2 . 06 acres from G-1, General Use to R-1, Single-Family Use; and 2) a preliminary plat of ten (10) lots of a minimum of 7200 square feet per lot to be developed at a future date with single-family residences. LOCATION: _763 Union Avenue N.E. TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Y\ BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P.M. ON • REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: APPROVED Y APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED G l` - S 7-vZ �T ��la T-r�1' cS/�-c:t.t4 L b .e o /P.4 rt-- DATE l7- /(� d' SIGNA'It1RE ,OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 6/88 RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DLeARTME9 i(At, 4� 0:,p04 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SH kT G.i, 0.94, y REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: ill,c.z. *7 19 „ f)DATE CIRCULATED: 11/3/88 COMMENTS DUE: 11/17/88 i ECF-091-88 APPLICATION NO(S) : R;PP 091-88 , PROPONENT: Steve Lusa/Oakwood Homes PROJECT TITLE: Oakwood Homes/Union Place BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks to: 1) rezone 2 . 06 acres from G-1, General Use to R-1, Single-Family Use; and 2) obtain a preliminary pla subdividing the parcel into ten (10) lots (minimum 7200 square feet per lot for future construction of a single-family development. LOCATION: 763 Union Avenue N.E. SITE AREA 2 . 06 acres BUILDING AREA (gross) : N/A IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth ° . 0 2 . Air ° . 3 . Water ° ° 4 . Plants ° ° 5. Animals ° ° 6. Energy & Natural Resources ° . ° . 7 . Environmental Health ° ° 8. Land & Shoreline Use ° ° 9. Housing ° . ° 10. Aesthetics 0 ° 11. Light & Glare ° 12 . Recreation ° ° 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ° ° 14 . Transportation ° ° ° 15. Public Services - ° ° 16. Utilities ° COMMENTS: We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or are wher dd. ' information is needed to properly assess this proposal. /V/ G/ am Si re of irector or Authorized Representative Date Rev. 6/8 8 ., RENTOLt COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEF ,__TMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 091-88 APPLICATION NO(S) . : _R; PP 091-88 PROPONENT: Steve Lusa/Oakwood Homes PROJECT TITLE: Oakwood Homes/Union Place BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:_Applicant seeks to obtain: 1) a rezone of 2 . 06 acres from G-1, General Use to R-1, Single-Family Use; and 2) a preliminary plat of ten (10) lots of a minimum of 7200 square feet per lot to be developed at a future date with single-family residences. LOCATION: _763 Union Avenue N.E. TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU _POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: t1L4p, APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED DATE //lL/�� NATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV., 6/88 RE1. JN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT L....+ARTMENef4 �' ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEEt !�.1 ' "b,'o,;, •REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: I I �� 198� I �3hn� �1 / DATE CIRCULATED: 11/3/88 COMMENTS DUE: 11/17/88 �� ECF-091-88 PLANNING DIVISION APPLICATION NO(S) : R;PP 091-88 CITY OF RENTON PROPONENT: Steve Lusa/Oakwood Homes D NOV 7 1988 I) PROJECT TITLE: Oakwood Homes/Union Place I t E I U I5 J BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks to: 1) rezone 2 . 06 acres from G-1, General Use to R-1, Single-Family Use; and 2) obtain a preliminary pla subdividing the parcel into ten (10) lots (minimum 7200 square feet per lot for future construction of a single-family development. LOCATION: _763 Union Avenue N.E. SITE AREA 2 . 06 acres BUILDING AREA (gross) : N/A IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth ° o ° 2 . Air ° 3 . Water ° 4 . Plants ° o ° 5. Animals ° ° 6. Energy & Natural Resources ° 7 . Environmental Health ° o ° 8. Land & Shoreline Use ° 9 . Housing ° o ° 10. Aesthetics ° o ° 11. Light & Glare ° ° 12 . Recreation ° ° ° 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ° ° ° ° 14 . Transportation ° ° ° f 15. Public Services ° ° 16.. Utilities ° COMMENTS: -4 �� a-77 We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or are re ad itiona nformation is needed to properly assess this p p y proposal. / 0— //-- Fe - Signature o Director or Authorized Representative Date Rev. 6/88 0,t/Pr 1. • CI24 s a,"" d'AIVIV;Ayi YT13 VNI J1 • I • ! „t9 REM.-- COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DL__RTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 091-88 APPLICATION NO(S) . : _R; PP 091-88 ml PROPONENT: Steve Lusa/Oakwood Homes NOV 1988 PROJECT TITLE: Oakwood Homes/Union Place Ulf pf1 BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:_Applicant seeks to obtain: 1) a rezone of 2 . 06 acres from G-1, General Use to R-1, Single-Family Use; and 2) a preliminary plat of ten (10) lots of a minimum of 7200 square feet per lot to be developed at a future date with single-family residences. LOCATION: _763 Union Avenue N.E. TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: Cvki APPROVED X APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED Qom -% (:114Q-eL- DATI/IO St SIGNATURE OF DI CTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 6/88 lgyy RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT O C/�OF�O ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEE y°p S1O4 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: O-h I i'1 �® ''7i9 9 DATE CIRCULATED: 11/3/88 COMMENTS DUE:_11/17/88 de ECF-091-88 APPLICATION NO(S) : R;PP 091-88 PROPONENT: Steve Lusa/Oakwood Homes PROJECT TITLE: Oakwood Homes/Union Place BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks to: 1) rezone 2 . 06 acres from G-1, General Use to R-1, Single-Family Use; and 2) obtain a preliminary pla subdividing the parcel into ten (10) lots (minimum 7200 square feet per lot for future construction of a single-family development. LOCATION: 763 Union Avenue N.E. SITE AREA 2 . 06 acres BUILDING AREA (gross) : N/A IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth ' ° 2 . Air ° ° ° 0 3 . Water ° ° ° ° 4 . Plants ° 5. Animals ° 6. Energy & Natural Resources ° 7. Environmental Health ° 8 . Land & Shoreline Use ° 9 . Housing ° 10. Aesthetics ° . 11. Light & Glare ° 12 . Recreation ° ° ° 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ° 14 . Transportation ° ° 15. Public Services • ° ° 16. Utilities ✓ ° COMMENTS: We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas which we have experri ,- an• ave identified areas of probable impact or are where additional i fo at'o ' needed to properly assess this proposal. 1 /I 6 -Fe Signature of Direr •r or Authorized Representative . Date Rev. 6/88 REnw.. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 091-88 APPLICATION NO(S) . : R; PP 091-88 PROPONENT: Steve Lusa/Oakwood Homes PROJECT TITLE: Oakwood Homes/Union Place BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:_Applicant seeks to obtain: 1) a rezone of 2 . 06 acres from G-1, General Use to R-1, Single-Family Use; and 2) a preliminary plat of ten (10) lots of a minimum of 7200 square feet per lot to be developed at a future date with single-family residences. LOCATION: _763 Union Avenue N.E. TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON • EWI G DEP TMENT/DIVISION: Or/L/Ty EA/6- y APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED �, ._o,J.E o v >i 09a3os-gpal s- t S E TTO LATE COMERS AGREEMENT-C::-'it ._._..� Ra/ ' //./751b X 272.27 4 1114. _ '4 O/S. 3y/ LATE COMERS AGREEMENT••CI_-::1 �- -� I1/0 I . SYSTEM DEYELOPMERT C66;;•:::i l. .,',''N g0D.D0 ' Kj. //7'A)/O.� Z sr-- A3� OOO. sr SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT C ,. ciitoLl, Ago,e ', ,, ,• •• =, 3 Gam• °' SPECIAL ASSESSMENT MI 1;::'.::2E-M ER SPECIAL ASSESSMENTf.„E :_'.: -SUM 04000. as APPROVED WATER PLAN APPROVED SEWER PLAID s .► r APPROVED FIRE HYDRANT LMDCATIONS BY FIRE 1,;,��� ! — --_--- JIP� . 4 DATE /l ( --Q(1 SIGNATURE 0 DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 6/88 R , , r PLANNING L ►N�D!VIS ,.. ._thili-I-- C FMCS ciTYpFRENrpN RENjuN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Nov 8 '1 _ _ 1 f � 1988 VIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SIDE; T d '` � fpo 11 L REVIEWING D , r NT: iirc. `�' 2k. 0 nrn - DATE CIRCULATED: _11/3/88 COMMENTS DUE: 11/17/88 ECF-091-88 APPLICATION NO(S) : R;PP 091-88 PROPONENT: Steve Lusa/Oakwood Homes PROJECT TITLE: Oakwood Homes/Union Place BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks to: 1) rezone 2. 06 acres from G-1, General Use to R-1, Single-Family Use; and 2) obtain a preliminary pla subdividing the parcel into ten (10) lots (minimum 7200 square feet per lot for future construction of a single-family development. LOCATION: _763 Union Avenue N.E. SITE AREA 2. 06 acres BUILDING AREA (gross) : N,L IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth ° o 0 ° 2 . Air 0 ° ° o 0 0 3 . Water a a ° o ° 0 4 . Plants ° ° ° o 0 ° 5. Animals ° o ° ° 6. Energy & Natural Resources ° o ° ° 7 .. Environmental Health 0 ° o 0 ° 8. Land & Shoreline Use ° o 0 0 9. Housing 0 ° ° o ° ° 10. Aesthetics ° 0 ° o ° ° 11. Light & Glare ° o ° ° 12 . Recreation ° 0 ° o 0 ° 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ° 14. Transportation ° ° ° o �e 15. Public Services ° o ° ° 16. Utilities ° COMMENTS: We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or are where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. 1L4-Signare of Director or Authorized Representative Date Rev. 6/8 8 . ., " . REN' COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DE___RTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 091-88 APPLICATION NO(S) . : R; PP 091-88 PROPONENT,: Steve Lusa/Oakwood Homes PROJECT TITLE: Oakwood Homes/Union Place BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:_Applicant seeks to obtain: 1) a rezone of 2 .06 acres from G-1, General Use to R-1, Single-Family Use; and 2) a preliminary plat of ten (10) lots of a minimum of 7200 square feet per lot to be developed at a future date with single-family residences. LOCATION: 763 Union Avenue N.E. TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION x. FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: pre- rek.I1UNIICA APPROVED. V/ APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED Any development and/or construction shall comply with current Fire and Building Codes and Ordi- nances. A second means of approved access is required. Fire Departme_nt access roads/lanes shall be paved minimum width 20'; minimum height 13' 6". Yes No Preliminary fire flow calculations show a'fire flow of % A,-1.4...7,-,..t..;0 A' is required. / hydrants with a minimuin of /° -0 gprn each is required. so-0 ' Primary hydrant is required to be within feet of the structure. Secondary hydrants are required to be within G ao 4 feet of the structure. An approved automatic sprinkler system is required to protect the total structure. Yes No J All fire department access roads are to be paved and installed prior to construction. Yes No All fire hydrants are required to be installed and approved prior to construction. Yes' No DATE v021 4 /Yf 1 SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 6/88 • i' CONSULTING ENGINEERING SERVICES d, / " Center Plaza West•Suite 360•12655 S.W.Center St.•Beaverton,Oregon 97005-1601 •(503)646-4509 646-5436 610 Market Street•Suite 200•Kirkland, Washington 98033•(206) 827-6730 PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF RENTON OCT 2 4 1988 Donald Erickson,AICP EMU City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washongton 98055 October 20 , 1988 Re: PP 091-88 (Preliminary Plat Union Place) Enclosed are notarized copies of letters sent to the property owners North of the parcel to be subdivided, and an aerial photo. As you can see by the aerial photograph superimposed with property lines, development potential is restricted to the lot irvnediately North of the proposed subdivision. With access di r`ectly onto Union Ave. N,E , ,in additional lot could be acc%ioor,}.-,:Lu3 on the most nxo:rtheerly parcel. The developer is prepared to negotiate with 't;he abutting property owner to Provide access through this proposed Su(.`.CiiVl57O I , if the property owner so desires . We wif. ). keep you posted as to future communications with the abutting property owners . John M. Gorisey Jr. P.E. • CONSULTING ENGINEERING SERVICES • .. •- Center Plaza West•Suite 360• 12655 S.W.Center St.•Beaverton,Oregon 97005-1601 •(503)646-4509 646-5436 610 Market Street•Suite 200•Kirkland,Washington 98033•(206) 827-6730 Resident/Property Owner 801 Union Avenue N.E. Renton, Washington 98055 October 20, 1988 • Re: PP 091-88 (Proposed Plat of Union Place) Attached is a copy of the above proposed subdivision. This letter is in response to a request by the City of Renton for us to inform you of our plans and seek input regarding your plans for your property. Please let us know what plans you have so we can review your development potential with respect to this application. Please call or write at your earliest convenience. ohn M. Godsey Jr. P.E. t CARL E JENSEN, SR. MY Commission Expires e_�/% /__ CONSULTING ENGINEERING SERVICES Center Plaza West•Suite 360. 12655 S.W.Center St.•Beaverton,Oregon 97005-1601 •(503)646-4509 646-5436 610 Market Street•Suite 200•Kirkland, Washington 98033•(206) 827-6730 • Resident/Property Owner 807 Union Avenue N.E. Renton, Washington 98055 October 20, 1988 Re: PP 091-88 (Proposed Plat of Union Place) Attached is a copy of the above proposed subdivision. This letter is in response to a request by the City of Renton for • us to inform you of our plans and seek input regarding your plans for your property. Please let us know what plans you have so we can review your development potential with respect to this application. Please call or write at your earliest convenience. Celle-7 / J h M. Godsey Jr. P.E. • f y Y a a .; -• s-.• .::..4......:.ft..P4-''-4:.1.::..i...''..A-• -4 ..-„-;-'„.0• 0,#... jib` / ' ✓ ». y . s l d kh 3/sec '4/ 2:. 3�:.y: ,f t. u, x i' • / Yr�///,f r/h#3 xS' y • �, d . : , � y sf i . a y � Ede, '. y. ife s S w:z c sa • w - k�1 f k'y �4' '� . "` �' f"i , ' Y � :-.. 4r4 HHy yE r/f., �,. YT : ,.w .r f s9 4 ? 2:f e -fxe id Y ,� s �"f�. ;'.1 /H 9.. i /`.A _ ,b.ry mow,,. '�i n� _ %fir ) • xmT y.. •Ik - ff....„ . a.,a*g, 3 ; { ff 9 ' Yy 5 ,y: K ,mow, ', 9Ry( P9 ham /x>^aL b. r $ y6i 9 .f i Y' • • . .'''''''i �w R • ": UNION ABLE NE i;;- ";- eF /ytf r yy Y# ! $ g Y z'w'. y� fb � H /� Y / 'p g ��' �/7 s y y 41# emiCITY OF RENTON DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor PLANNING DIVISION October 3, 1988 Steve Lusa c/o John Godsey 12655 S.W. Center #360 Beaverton, Oregon 97005 RE: Oakwood Homes, 763 Union Avenue N.E. , (ECF;R; PP 091-88) Dear Mr. Lusa: We have completed a preliminary review of the above- referenced application. In order to proceed with the evaluation of the proposed project we must have the additional information described below. 1. A revised vicinity map which clearly delineates land uses on developed properties. 2 . A revised site plan which includes: a. A cul-de-sac with a fifty-five (55) foot radius (See Section 9-1108 [7] [K] [2] of Renton' s Subdivision Code) ; b. Revised dimensions for Lots 3 - 8, inclusive, to reflect the re-design of the cul-de-sac; c. Setbacks for future proposed development for Lots 1 -10, inclusive (Section 9-1106 [2] [I] [8] ) . In addition, the configuration of your proposed plat is such that: a) legal access to the western portion of the neighboring property immediately to the north cannot be obtained once your property is developed in the manner in which you propose; and b) your proposed access will not be usable at any time in the future for access to that property. For these reasons, you should notify owners of the two properties due north of your property of your 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2550 Steve Lusa Oakwood Homes ECF; R; PP-091-88 October 4, 1988. Page 2 proposed development plan. You should also endeavor to work with those owners to determine whether your proposed plan is acceptable to them, and, if it is not acceptable, whether a revised plan can be developed through a cooperative effort which will facilitate future development of all three affected parcels. You should submit notarized copies of each of your letters of notification to neighboring property owners, and a written statement describing the course and the outcome of your negotiations with those owners. The City is more likely to approve a proposed development plan for your property which has the support of these neighboring property owners, in view of the fact that use of those properties is dependent upon availability of access to all portions of the affected site. If we receive the above-listed materials by October 28, 1988 we can resume processing of your application. If we do not receive this information by that date, we may return your application having found that it lacks sufficient necessary information to be accepted at this time. In the latter case you would have to resubmit when the necessary materials are available. If you have any questions, please contact me or Lenora Blauman of my staff, at 235-2550. Si rely, j1/ Donald p Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator DKE/lb:mjp Enclosure ,MEMORANDUM To y. Date )017 /i?) From Subject � )nn6� � - � `� pC� h,NA‹,(Ds -Stew � -Cl\ a.�-c� �- -pr�e-igcD Mce ,60 fo/zOpr ' /I/ w1 45/ P ,frnd) ,Q oy 7#6440' CONSULTING ENGINEERING SERVICES LIEVUrA OF unzaKea0mil. 360 Center Plaza West (ittS 12655 SW Center St. Beaverton, OR 97005 Phone 646.4509 DATE JOB NO. ATTENTIOn 4'e'er Ft le.'-e cC1..../ RE: y TO 0. t fr c_ea -1-6�� t---(4 d'o tq f t f - . — 2o K,, ( LC- - 5:(qu ct_,8 i VilScc).-v _, t '>� 0 5 Minx/4 Divisoli WE ARE SENDING YOU 0 Attached ❑ Under separate cover via ❑ Shop drawings ❑ Prints ❑ Plans ❑ Sa D BYSEPifiliatis:OCT 2 43extgeio ❑ Copy of letter 0 Change order 0 E C E 9 r COPIES DATE NO. ��y�e ,,sspg4rDESCRIPTION PP"r` .%' 6/41 y� THESE ARE TR . SMITTED as checked below: For approval 0 Approved as submitted 0 Resubmit copies for approval O For your use 0 Approved as noted 0 Submit copies for distribution — ❑ As requested 0 Returned for corrections 0 Return corrected prints ❑ For review and comment ❑ ❑ FOR BIDS DUE 19 0 PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US REMARKS COPY TO / _........0 z. SIG PRODUCT 240-3 /A B i Inc.Groton,Mass.01471. If enclosures are not as noted, kindly otify s at once. -" {i'i _ J � Y_s- ,..�._a..l _. DATE ¢ // �T JOB NO. s' =s� 31;7f" ATTENTION® 'a� �i- !,";A s It" f / tee e S 1 RE: TO -_.. a � , f WE ARE SENDING YOU D Attached 0 Under separate cover via the following items: ❑ Shop drawings ❑ Prints ❑ Plans. 0 Samples ❑ Specifications • ❑ Copy of letter 0 Change order 0 COPIES DATE• NO. DESCRIPTION THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: ❑'For approval • 0 Approved as submitted ❑ Resubmit copies for approval ❑ For your use ❑ Approved as noted 0 Submit copies for distribution ❑ As requested 0 Returned for corrections 0 Return corrected prints' ❑ For review and comment 0 O FOR BIDS DUE - 19 0 PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US REMARKS • COPY TO r, I i� SIGNED: ' ,t 'yF1 '.�` .�' :sty-='--• �_. �-� PRODUCT 240-3/ Ees/im.,Groton,Mass.otan. If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us rat once. cVY CAT Y Ur ithN l UN FILE NO(S): H-07/-65 jb ,,® Bl DING & ZONING DEPARTMI F. PP-09I-88 .0 E�-09/-86 • MASTER APPUCATI •N NOTE TO APPLICANT: Since this is a comprehensive application form, only those items related to your specific type of application(s) are to be completed. (Please print or type. Attach additional sheets if necessary.) APPLICANT 1TYPE OF APPLICATION NAME FEES Oakwood Hones, Inc. /evQ REZONE*(FROM G-1 TO R-1 ) 3 7, . ADDRESS 18712 142nd N.E. ❑ SPECIAL PERMIT* CITY Woodinville, 6Ja. ZIP 98072 TEMPORARY PERMIT* ❑ CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT* TELEPHONE ❑ SITE PLAN APPROVAL (206) 485-9090 cmSPECIAL PERMIT FOR GRADE AND FILL No. of Cubic Yards: • CONTACT PERSON • - ❑ . VARIANCE* . From Section: * Justification Required NAME John Godsey d ADDRESS SUBDIVISIONS: .'34F0, 1 12655 S.W. Center #360 ❑ SHORT PLAT CITY ZIP " ❑ TENTATIVE PLAT Beaverton, Or. 97005 Q PRELIMINARY PLAT TELEPHONE Q FINAL PLAT (503) 646-4509 ❑ WAIVER (Justification Required) OWNER NO. OF LOTS: to NAME PLAT NAME: P.tN in:..h Pj�f.— Oakwood Homes, Inc. 1 ADDRESS • • PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: • ❑ PRELIMINARY CITY ZIP ❑ FINAL P.U.D. NAME: TELEPHONE ' ❑ Residential ❑ Industrial ❑ Commercial ❑ Mixed LOCATION MOBILE HOME PARKS: PROPERTY ADDRESS . 763 Union Ave. N.E. ❑ TENTATIVE co EXISTING USE PRESENT ZONING PRELIMINARY Single Family G-1 ❑ FINAL PROPOSED USE PARK NAME: . Single .family subdivision, 10 lots- ..NUMBER OF SPACES: 7,200 sq. f t. min. © ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE * SQ. FT. ACRES reip AREA: 89,734 2.06 TOTAL FEES 710, i' % icl ,; + I•.a 10 V';i 1.STAFF USE ONLY -- ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESSING DATE STAMP '`•-` L-'L: u � � 'I� li . ���: c, t(C� (} :s t APPLICATION RECEIVED BY: ��� �Y�� yr tt- ��`�L� - - r: 3. cr`ai APPLICATION DETERMINED TO BE: _]' ,.-', r ' - ' ''' rl?O�'IIVv uLPT. 0 Accepted s, , . ❑ Incomplete "'. Notification,Sent' On By: •• , f - , (Initials) DATE ROUTED ADDITIONAL MATERIAL RECEIVED BY: " ` ,':,- . - . APPLICATION DETERMINED TO BE: A !ID . ❑ Accepted ❑ Incomplete Notification Sent On By: (Initials) ROUTED TO: ❑ Building ❑ Design Eng. ❑ Fire ❑ Parks • ❑ Police ❑ Policy Dev. ❑ Traffic Eng. ❑. Utilities ��r REVISED 1-.31-84 -� Legal description of property (if more space is required, attach a separate sheet). AFFIDAVIT • 4 Steven W. Lusa ' ,, being• duly sworn, declare that I am authorized representative to act for the property owner,Downer of the property involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the Information herewith submitted are In all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS 30th DAY . OF June 19 88 . • NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, RESIDING AT Seattle /44. ---A/d-OV —) ,,. ;Zaga6 "- 1 (Name of Notary Public) (Signature of Owner) 18712 142nd N.E., Woodinville, .WA 98072 18712 142nd N.E., Woodinville, WA 98072 (Address) (Address) M. 4 ti _ �,+4sSION fXP+r 4I aQ' '.`(���OTAR�jcr "69 (City) (State) (Zip) ���i'PUBLIC d! (206)485-9090 I�P ® �19 -�--4c)- (Telephone) ('p�Q wns``���o Acceptance of thisp1an and required filing fee does not constitute a complete application. Plans and other materials required to constitute a complete application are listed in the "Application Procedure," Form #174 czz ) 03 u_ 0 f'J ~aE � 2' KING COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ASSESSMENTS F'AI11080-S1 AS37 REAL PROPERTY LEGAL DESCRIPTION 06/30/88 ACCOUNT NUMBER: 092305-9125-0 PROPERTY ADDRESS: 763 UNION AV NE 98055 RENTON TAXPAYER NAME: GRANT JULIUS OTR: SE SECT: 09 TWN: 23 RNG: 05 FOLIO: 22775-C- SUBAREA: 032-003 LEGAL DESCRIPTION - PAGE 1 LO1 BLOCK PLAT: N 1/3 OF FOLD'-NE 1/4 OF SE 1/4 LES,S'S15 ACRES LESS CO RD LESS CIM RGTS LESS W 6 AC END OF LEGAL DESCRIPTION * 0. 1 ) CHOOSE ONE OF' (ION: PRINT (HIS SCREEN PRINT OLE F'fiOF'ER'I'( CHARAC TERI'E T:ICS PI ,., OFF • -~=F(- SEE PROPERTY HISTORY PF6 . OR PF• 1.8 SEE TAX INFORMATION PF2 OR <:: PF14 TO END PF1.2 OR -=:: PF24 ZONE CHANGE REQUEST This request for a rezone from G-1 to R-1 is being made in conjuction with submittal of . a preliminary plat. The G-1 designation is given to residential properties when they annex, as a common practice. Properties in the area and around the proposed site have developed to R-1 densities in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan designated residential use. Sewer and water to support R-1 development is available in Union Avenue N.E. ( 132nd •Avenue S.E. ) which provides the east boundary of the site. Reclassification of the property from G-1 to R-1 is in conformance with the Comprehensive plan and since access and • services are available, it is appropriate to consider this request. Reclassification to R-1 will be in keeping with past actions and practices on similar property in the area and conforms to the Residential Goals and Policies of the Comprehensive Plan. • CITY OF RENTO1 D SEP161988 BUILDING/ZON!r,1G F.A CH1,. 3 TITLE INSURANCE COMPAN: 701 FIFTH AVENUE, SUITE 1800 SEATTLE WASHINGTON 98104 JOHN WICKWIRE 0 A. L. T. A. COMMITMENT Our No. 134105 GEORGEAN MOORE SCHEDULE A Your No. UNIT 2 628-5675 Effective Date: February 29, 1988 at 8: 00 A. M. 1. Policy to be issueo: ALTA Owner 's Policy. Form B 1970 - Amount: TO BE AGREED UPON • (Amended 10-17-70 and 10-17-84) Premium: Standard Tax: Proposed Insured: OAKWOOD HOMES 2. The estate or interest in the land described herein and which is covered • by this commitment is: A Fee Simple 3. The estate or interest referred to' herein is at Date of Commitment vested in: • TED M. WOOTEN and MADISON DORIS WOOTEN, HUSBAND AND WIFE 4.• The, land referred to in this commitment is situated in the County of King. State of Washington, and is described as follows: SEE SCHEDULE • A (NEXT PAGE) • • CITY OF RENTO'l • SEP 1 6 1988 • BUILDING/ZONING DEPT. PAGE 1 • L. T. A. COMMITMENT SCHEDULE A (Continued ) Our No. 134105 Your No. • THE NORTH 1/3 OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PROPERTY; THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; EXCEPT THE SOUTH 15 ACRES THEREOF; AND EXCEPT COUNTY ROAD; EXCEPTING FROM SAID NORTH 1/3 THAT PORTION PLATTED AS ALBERT BALCH 'S PRESIDENT PARK NO. 4, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 51 OF PLATS, PAGES 14 AND 15, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. • • • PAGE 2 COMMITMENT SCHEDULE B Our No. 134105 • Your No. Schedule B of the policy or policies to be issued will contain exceptions to the following matters unless the same are disposed of to the satisfaction of the Company. GENERAL EXCEPTIONS A. Rights or claims of parties in possession not shown by the public records. B. Encroachments, overlaps, boundary line disputes, and any other matters which would be disclosed by an accurate survey and inspection of the premises. C. Easements or claims of easements not shown by the public records. D. Any lien, , or right to a lien, for services, labor or material heretofore or hereafter furnished, imposed by law and not shown by the public records. Also including liens under the Workman's Compensation Act. E. Taxes or special assessments which are not shown as existing liens by the public records. ' F. Any service, installation, connection, maintenance or construction charges for sewer, water, electricity or garbage removal. G. (a) Reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; (b ) . water . rights, claims or title to water. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters, if any, created, first appearing in the public records or attaching subsequent to the effective date hereof but prior to the date the proposed insured acquires for value of record the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this commitment. Instruments creating the estate or interest to be insured must be approved and filed for record. , PAGE 3 L. T. A. COMMITMENT SCHEDULE B (Continued ) Our No. 134105 Your No. SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS 1. 6 FEET DRAIN EASEMENT DISCLOSED ON THE FACE OF THE PLAT OF ALBERT BALCH'S PRESIDENT PARK NO. 4, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 51 OF PLATS, PAGES 14 AND 15, IN KING COUNTY, WASH I NGTON, SAID PLAT BEING ADJACENT ON THE SOUTH AND WEST TO, THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN THIS REPORT. SAID EASEMENT AFFECTS THE SOUTHERLY PORTION OF THE PROPERTY HEREIN DESCRIBED. 2. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTEE: CITY OF RENTON PURPOSE: ROADWAY SLOPE AND SIDEWALK OF SAID PREMISES AREA AFFECTED: EASTERLY 5 FEET OF NORTHERLY 100 FEET OF SAID PREMISES DATED: NOT DISCLOSED RECORDED: July 14, 1971 RECORDING NUMBER: 7107140475 3. RESERVATIONS AND EXCEPTIONS CONTAINED IN DEED FROM NORTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY: RESERVING AND EXCEPTING FROM SAID LANDS SO MUCH OR SUCH PORTIONS THEREOF AS ARE OR MAY BE MINERAL LANDS OR CONTAIN COAL OR IRON, AND ALSO THE USE AND THE RIGHT AND'TITLE TO THE USE OF SUCH SURFACE GROUND AS MAY BE NECESSARY FOR GROUND OPERATIONS AND THE RIGHT OF ACCESS TO SUCH RESERVED AND EXCEPTED MINERAL LANDS, INCLUDING LANDS CONTAINING COAL OR IRON, FOR THE PURPOSE OF EXPLORING, DEVELOPING AND WORKING THE SAME. RECORDING NUMBER: 51717 SAID DEED HAS BEEN AMENDED BY AGREEMENT RECORDED APRIL 28, 1954 UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 4450143 TO PROVIDE FOR JUST AND REASONABLE COMPENSATION FOR ANY INJURY TO THE SURFACE OF SAID LAND IN EXERCISING THESE RIGHTS. • 4. PAYMENT OF THE REAL ESTATE EXCISE TAX, IF REQUIRED. THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SITUATED WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES OF LOCAL TAXING AUTHORITY OF CITY OF RENTON. PRESENT RATE OF REAL ESTATE EXCISE TAX AS OF THE DATE HEREIN IS 1. 59 PERCENT. 5. GENERAL TAXES: FIRST HALF DELINQUENT MAY 1, SECOND HALF DELINQUENT . NOVEMBER 1: YEAR: 1988 AMOUNT BILLED: $ 893. 25 AMOUNT PAID: $ 0. 00 AMOUNT DUE: . 4 893. 25 TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER: 092305-9125-00 LEVY CODE: 2100 PAGE 4 COMMITMENT SCHEDULE B (Continued ) Our No. 134105 Your No. 6. WE NOTE A POWER OF ATTORNEY EXECUTED BY MADISON DORIS WOOTEN, NAMING JULIUS GRANT AS HER ATTORNEY IN FACT, DATED DECEMBER 04, 1981, RECORDED DECEMBER 08, 1981 UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 8112080282 AND QUESTION THE VALIDITY OF THE FOLLOWING MATTER AS SET FORTH IN PARAGRAPH 7. 7. THE EFFECT OF QUIT CLAIM DEED: GRANTOR: MADISON DORIS WOOTEN, BY JULIUS GRANT, ATTORNEY IN FACT GRANTEE: JULIUS GRANT, A SINGLE MAN, AS HIS SEPARATE ESTATE DATED: December 04, 1981 RECORDED: December 09, 1981 RECORDING NUMBER: 8112090262 THE INTEREST OF JULIUS GRANT, IF ANY, IS SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING MATTER, SHOWN IN PARAGRAPH 8. 8. JULIUS GRANT DIED ON November 19, 1987, WITH ACTION PENDING IN KING COUNTY PROBATE CASE NUMBER 87-4-04802-8. GREGORY GRANT WAS APPOINTED PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE ON November 30► 1987. THE ESTATE HAS BEEN GRANTED AN ORDER OF SOLVENCY AND SAID PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE IS AUTHORIZED TO SELL AND CONVEY OR MORTGAGE SAID PROPERTY. ATTORNEY FOR THE ESTATE MICHAEL J. DEFRANCO. 9. LIEN OF SUCCESSION TAXES, IF ANY, IN THE ESTATE OF JULIS GRANT, DECEASED. KING COUNTY PROBATE CASE NUMBER 87-4-04802-8. THE EFFECT OF SAID PROBATE IS DEPENDENT UPON THE IDENTIY OF THE SAID DECEASED WITH THE ABOVE NAMED ATTORNEY—IN FACT. FURTHER, WE NOTE FOR INFORMATION A SON OF LEGAL AGE NAMED JULIUS GRANT JR. , MENTIONED IN SAID PROBATE. End of Schedule B PAGE 5 :Insurance Comp- `} • ' .IMPORTANT:This is not a Plat of Survey.It is furnished as a convenience to locate the land indicated hereon with reference.to streets and other land.No liability is assumed by reason of reliance hereon. , ORDER NO. V314 1 n.5 • - 1800 Columou Center 701 Filth Avenue Seattle.Washington 98104 NE GAR. OF C * 2 • .../ 6.1.14.eF .Nor+tk eQ Seu�c1� • W.b At. tra Au a5• IN ,_ • . OQ'+- w '7tt . J 4, , W. -PP` R./I.E.7-rf+ s7: 4 v • im,' e � Jpkr . . . co i TN.4,..x 1. -4. tki . `r:'s of P+h. l�••, /5$' US V Ili h nti (gt Vi PT.t.t=.t Oc.o? ' 3.4 A .Lylrq N.aC S.IS Ac. Pi. r ---->„ f» . . I ( . • . P . --. 3a' Fei.'ss , . OF R4, /1? ECF: I O9/-85 t$ z City of Renton LU: rov-88 o -ON-88 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST O,917' SEP'N . Purpose of Checklist: The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43.21 C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for allproposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. Instructions for Applicants: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly. with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully. to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply." Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain.your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impacts. Use of Checklist for Nonproject Proposals: (Please Type or Print Legibly) Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D). For nonproject actions (actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs), the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site", should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. A. BACKGROUND • 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: U0-10 1�LA 2. Name of applicant: ©��v)oo vD Day EL-DPe-rk . l i tiles, 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: if)-152 1 /VE sTEVE LU,S A (200 4 -c(d9 cD 1A)o017 l k /1 � 9801 +`"�� �c�ksc�l CRC> SCE-1(5�3 (oL(C,, 4. Date checklist prepared: 3c�nl pgv, lc a& 5. Agency requesting checklist: C crty 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): • FALL t98$ Cv 615 Ric_.;1o^/ CITY QFFcT ^ D NNE �II LIU SEP 161988 BUI1 DING/ZONING- DEPT. ' • 7. Do you have any plan_ .Jr future additions. expansions, or ther activity related - to or connected with this proposal? if yes. explain. p • 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. . • IJoN12_ 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. l,i 0 10. List any governmental approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal. if known. ' 2'at,i e_ cwa 4st i�c V psi eg\-/ i vAL c T�� 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and. the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. pao EzL7, til 1=g o ) "7,ZcD0 SQ t-oc T L- i'S ic> i�c�i� :; ©�mi l__ . l'C IS Z. .0( A g 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topography map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. EARTH a. General description of the site (circle one); flat, ollin• hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other . b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, caly. sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils. , specify them and note any prime.farmland.. f L.SJ V%JCoL7. tern. -& I Moc)a— T WELL.D'a•Flln(EQ opf nowt'LL.N./ �riK� L a�.nn 2c — LEA 4MC446-S TXLtT ,ra m G0ti(-5c..) i d.' ' ° Are there surface indications OF history of unstable soils in the immediate •vicinity? If so,'describe: • - 2 - e. Describe the l lose, type, and approximate quan •es of any filling or • grading proposed. Indicate source of fill.. 1vt,i t q,p Gi RAC t(-4 c- U Atom( i-r t' 'c glee)4(_ P(L S J2oc. /i 4Par2.,7- FcrZ. /2a.4,/, i3<4" f. Could erosion_'occur as a result of clearing, construction, or ,use? If so, generally describe. M t m t M�� P 43,4,1m �1200c Z'ca N1l t dut- M Ei t svact • g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? 3C 1 h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: Sw M IL CA�tsT2c.�L'il o fr Mc ivi 2.a '\ /Ac.., o F- V .-c i�t' zz - ✓ l a APPIz°tlt f7 �<210 M T Pc:›L -.4�1 2. AIR a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Mti c e. ,cS'r" t4L&1 cD VZ.► c.c,L.-r Ntt tc3c- S ' Dt.-'.P tcLjG( c_c 4-Ta _c..Ttc 4 , LApc:. C ow\PL_(1T tc-ui : N oQ- 1V _ cc(_ tz t�l t Ssc are�S b. Are there any off-site sources of emission? fQ.v • c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, •'. if any: 3. WATER a. 'Surface: • 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity, of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide'names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. NIO 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans.• ' 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. N O(4 • - 3 - 4) Will the propc., require surface water withdrawa.., it diversions? Give general description, purpose. and approximately quantities if known. 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. ' 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and appaoximately quantities if known. 1h/AZ Vki`t—�— F� C.4��i e=i� Tdc -- ,A( ' YSTE. ^ ,,C3.'//Sc/44-0 (,Y7 D "f 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals . . .; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable). or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, If any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. 0 3� 1N,, vJ 1 L-L B Got...l_...iE Tt E Fet. .t-LDt -TtOgs c°9d /40(-45tE E'c of ,CF ANTE) Acq FAXt /A./cr (5 Pr- .scrc 73vsi'/ti 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. (�(O Sta.N c t f3-e-y SE v1J6,,S 1iU'(�=C-. iS L Ree=./ I DC,� d. Proposed mea 9s to reduce or control surface, g Id, and runoff water impacts, if any: ' 1f11 - z T1 ors{ vi (--i- S o�J t Dr.cc Tt-1f2Cx1�G-E E# • U C- 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: o deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen. other o evergreen tree: fir. cedar, pine, other o Shrubs o grass o crop or grain o Wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup. bullrush. skunk cabbage, other o water plants: water lily, eel grass, milfoil, other o other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? ¢.PPP-Ox.l M'a`r L'7' oT'E:. kV(L L '& _ Aevr, +A).(L C, /3 3.6Vv :30 c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: Birds: Hawk, heron, eagle, ongbi s, other Mammals: deer, bear, elk, beother Fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish. other b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. Not ( . c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. ' _ 5 _ . • d. Proposed measL_ to preserve or enhance wildlife. i y: Nc� v • • • 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas. oil, wood stove, solar) will be . • . used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. • • [� .i? c iTY l�ll�—[c ,4( C�7/4-S sr0P� )407 1 l� ire/ A /p • • b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent . properties? If so, generally describe. •T 1AJOu� c 'PDT E.NlT ! r`-'1P avir /macC:�SS By T vJE 21E/? / • • • c. • What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this • proposal? List other proposed measures to 'reduce or control energy impacts. if any: • 7. Environmental Health . . • • . a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill. or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. •. . P • , • 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. ••- LM�.�.G�t� G�7 scaf2_t,"1,c-E S .�� c./.�T�7� 1AJf7H z7 .^177:74— Sfr+rc7L (L/ . 2) . Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: M64E_ • • b. Noise • 1) What types of. noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for . • example: traffic;'equipment;"operetion; other)?. • - 6 • - 2) What types ar )vals of noise would be created bl 'associated with the - project on 'a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic. construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. ., Ae To 5 P int r J1/ c-y 77A L "/a/se- 0 s Z 4 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts. if any: • 8. Land and Shoreline Use • ' a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? • S'(T- t s P VC c,t.S ff-P ;cd o S t ktal Lam. FAPt fit. 2 i tE'✓l(G G-i (As Es.. /ARE (&CnL_ FAwt Ly PES1 f.") '(A L • b. •Has the site been used for agriculture? If so. describe. No ' c. Describe any structures on the site. • ��sz'►+1�-� t-4cxA5S€. D • d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? AND • e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? ' .G - s�1--kcALE ".Fig cL-.f f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? LAI Fies4M l Ly t�—��i D i cl g. If applicable. what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? IV h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive area? If so, specify. " No Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? to •l-i-ous-e_{-kc:a.--�� .z S PE.OPLE j. Approxirriatelyhow:many.people'would the completed project displace? k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: - 7 • 1. Proposed'meat s to ensure the proposal is compi _ le with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: (>LA64 a_1 ' Z©N,ttgC.1 i C06,0parT/LB _E- (A/tr- Ext,SZ"lNG-).; '4eV 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided. if any? Indicate whether high. middle, or low-income housing. i 1 b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts. if any: 10. Aesthetics - a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s). not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: ' 11. Light and Glare S a. ' What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? b. Could light or glare from ' the finished project.;be.'a safety hazard or interfere with views? c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? . MO NI E_ d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: /40 a • 'i 2. Recreation ' a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? K1,V)AN S P Q4, 2 CCLc c.<5 N 0,427W • SCl-4c c L_ .AGE.Ccs.S b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so. describe. NO c.c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: • 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally�dgescribe. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to.be on or next to the site. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: • 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. tAN1 font A V r_ t _� . C t�2 . A V S e__ J b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximately distance to the nearest transit stop? . •te.S c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? Z d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). • 'N( C.LU_— P�c��-1' .(Ai'-1 lc�rW Au, Ai . F T ` 1011((7� 1A11 T 1¢ �G(C=7 : . . 9 _ e. Will the projec se (or occur in the immediate vic y of) water, rail. or air transportation? If so, generally describe. NO f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. l o o ‘/r,ActGL-W-. i g. p Tay 1 B'e.c cAM-E.hf L', 3o. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts. if any: OOKE- 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection. police protection. health care, schools, other)? If so. generally describe. . /4 S M( f frisk( __ • b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. 16. . Utilities a. Cir ; util' 'es men __art le the le: lectric' n(ural ga)s �-� r use servic telephone, anitary sews . sep lc system other. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service;and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate'vicinity which might be needed. �, v€,e ttll,4cT ,,�. • rD2M C,Q,c4-cr�-(A;C-i� ' C.tT� ©� t�� , E_Ltzc..T1zLLtT Pi-<. s Mz? ��c ('� Et N41++n- 644— CZ-As VVA,s14 iki(ZTb/\e" /YAT -i/9 - C14S TV_L _pk-tc cz :. ' .PAckFLC- Nloc-r i-vaS? C. SIGNATURE I. the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non-significance that it might issue in'reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation' or willful'lack of full disclosure on' • ' my part. Proponent: Name Printed: 7 r to ' #176 11-8-84 • , • . D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHE FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS • (This sheet should only be used for actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs. Do not use this sheet for project actions.) Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal. would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms. 1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air: production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous sutstances; or production of noise? Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants. animals, fish. or marine life? Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants. animals. fish. or marine life are: 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: 4. • How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive'areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species . habitat, historic or cultural sites. wetlands, floodplains. or prime farmlands? Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: . .J.iR:` o. � m�\fir i _ .. -1; ,v=•-,.T t. .C( ,.. `... . • - is _`.. _ .. . .... ♦ .o _:'ll . u 1 S. How would the propc be likely to affect land and s ;line use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with. existing plans? • Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? ' ' Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or r federal ' laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any . declaration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist ' should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on . my part. . Proponent: Name Printed: ' - 12 • • \ ALOE-T BALCHS P'•ESIDENT P•RK NO. 4 • 1140111P: .: 1114 il .4 46'.. ,r. . . . . . . . . . .. • . . . 0 . . . 1 v [ • CO ,0.00 D STO• EASEMENT 2 4771& • ic... Ilipp... .,. . •N a . .© V • rn _, lit) • ,.. . . .. Z I "I" _ •I1.I,I 1 1.36 ' O V iiilI I ' ri- I \1 ..., 11L3Y , F. i ,.. yy�� a, .. . . .........z_.____ 0g u ., L .. • 36• WA .R IS• :•M DRAIN' O . .. Y1 I . .a.___ i, ., ___ , a• SANITARY SEWER --• r '" Ex CURB N.E.. 132nd AVENUE , to f " . 11 t• uN ••.• F, -r A +s 0 1 • Z ONm. = �jn to m t • . To a �I la • 1.0 D Z S.E. UNI• . o in C R 10 : , q PROJ NO 60-262 DATE 6/7/60 REVISIONS - E DESIGN BY MG DRAWN BY JUG • NCONSULTING ENGINEERING SERVICES PRELIMINARY PLAT COM MAU WMWIT MO I34+>446-4501 UNION PLACE Iffy It MIDI ff. RUP.AW AMITON.UP. • CITY OF REnnNTQi.I , •_.� • • 0 SEP 161988 • c, CERTIFICATION OF NOTIFICATION OF ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS/SUBDIVISION * * *FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY* * PROJECT TITLE: APPLICANT: APPLICATION NUMBER: The following provides a list of the names of property owners and their addresses who own land within 300 feet of the subject plat. The following provides a list of property owners and their addresses who own land within 300 feet of the subject site. The following individuals were mailed notices of the public hearing on the subject plat as prescribed by RCW 58.17.090 and Renton City Code, Chapter 11, Renton Subdivision Ordinance. • E - :TT-pcNA ASSESSOR'S NAME ADDRESS PARCEL NUMBER • _CITY OF RENTO:I C � [ I� F ni, �SEP 16 -1988 DU!!D!NG/7Cn:lpIv i;coT . .i ASSESSOR'S NAME ADDRESS PARCEL NUMBER h e pY. 4 ASSESSOR'S NAME ADDRESS PARCEL NUMBER A-CT CERTIFICATION I, .-t a .l c ) . L 4-c A, hereby certify that the above list(s) of adjacent property owners and their addresses were taken from the records of the King County Assessor as prescribed by law. AT TEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me. a Notary Public, in and for he Statq,pf Washington residing at kie v I V( _- on the 2 day of ft/ '0-47/j" SI I. hereby certify that notices of the public meeting on the subject plat were mailed on . to each listed adjacent property owner as prescribed by law. ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a Notary Public. in and for the State of Washington residing at on the day of SIGNED: FORM 190 ****************************************************************#*4141********** • , t , i BATCWNUMBER: CX COMMENTI . . * . CUSTOMER NAME , JOHN . GODSPC . , . . . ,.i - * . . _- . • . •• • • .., • . - ' 4• • -rr.P7..,--17.-rn 04210040230703 ' ' f 0421.001P023549.81., ,CMEYNE 'SAWK, 0 . ' 1076 .4 - ,OUGOALEjOSEPWD , •- • - . i4V r7271SHELTOWAYE9NE . . 'Vl..., ' L ;3900WE7YW.ST . ,RENTON WA ' 98055 : ! ! ,RENTOWWA- * 158055 _ .1 ., • • • ..•.• • _ _ . . . . . .4 ,. • _ __ . 04210040240-01 ; , . 0421001.0245-.06 - • - ,NICHOLSAL ' : . .HOWE!EVELYN. i439999 3901NE7TH- • 13568' 139TWPi.TSE : 'RENTON .WA , 98055 ! . 12ENTON ,WA ' • . 98056' .04210040250-08 04210040255,03 . ' FISHER-S1DNEYA.: ' 860572 . JCUSICVRICHARDFE , • \454122, 16428 -SE ' 149TWST' , . 1703SHELTOWAYE 'NE' :RENTOWWA - 98056 AZENTOWWV . ' 98056 '- -• . . . ' 042100-.0260-06' - . P . .-0421004026540 A.AMBGEORGE !C0477, ILEE;jAMES1H ,E068IJ :691LSHEITON,AVENE ' 4821A(ENTTOES :MOINESROP0207 :RENTON-WA - 98055 : . • KENUWA , . . ,98031. . .042100-0345-05 ;042100T0350-07 _ UNITED, SAYINGSLOAWBANK: 629999' , ' : WALLISWILLIAM:B , . C0479; '601SJACKSOWST , ' t70rMONTERYPLNE . ' SEATTLE , WA ' 98104: AMNION, . WA - 98055 : . , . . 042100.-0355436' 042100-0360-05 . . . _ .(HOCHHALTER :EDWIN' L A02705 . .MCINTOSH !MARVIWT ! • *695778 ' ' 718- SHELTOWAVE. NE 1.14622' SE172ND' ST RENTON , WA - )98056 4tENTOWWA , 98058 - • . , 04210040365-‘00! '04210040370403i . MARTIN ATHEL: D+CINDY:X • ' 739999 ,JACKSOWJOHWD . • • ;710:•SHELTOWAVENE' . , 13637! SE> 107MPLACE . • RENTON: WA . 98056i ' RENTOWWA . . 98055 , . .04210040375408 ' 04210040380.001‘ KNIGHT .DANNYA. . 769999' . CARLSOWIVA . . -0578 . 3912 .NE: 7TWST' 13916NE7TW-ST RENTON: WA ;18056 . RENTOWWA- ' - . • )98055' • . ' . . - I:y - . ,• _.:, .10, • • • . '. ---.....-------- - - : 04210040385,06' •,-, ..• . , . '042100.1.0390!-09i GILMOREA.tI - .231579 . _ . AJNOSEY :RONNIE)11 4000 !NE7TH : ST — r4004 'NEr/TWST, '. 1 RENTON WA ' ' 98056 ;RENTON .WA'. - A8055 : 4 • •, _ . 04210040395,04- :0421000400,,07f. , SLAUGHTER:CLAUDE; R . :359999. ' i AMMERSHEIM1TER . .RY '671587( --- '21615 ' 105TH:PL ' SE i4132 ; 178TWPUSW ACENT :WA ' 98032: % [ A.YNNWOODAA - ' 98037i • - !., . . _ , • . 042100..0405-P.02,, : : 0421001.041005 . . 'MEINOERS DONALD' G ' -BRADFIEMJAMES : W ' ,- 751UNIOWAVEAE ' ' . ;401614E ;7TH-ST 1 RENTON WA ' '98055 ' : cRENTOWWA : 98055 ' . , • _. • .0421004041500 ' ' ! . ' ' • ' ;04210040420403 , ' AURLACHERIJUNE t0479, - 'CHAN: RAYMOW.S ' 'E088V i'--- 1 " 19710' SE '277TWST : ' ' H, 679!UN/OWAVE41E ' KENTA4A . 98031 — ;RENTOWWV • L98055 : 042100..0425-08- 042100-0430401 ': 1 . ' BRENTA1 ROBERT : .319999' ' ' KEENER :HARVEYAI . ' - A075 1 4017NE ;7TH , ' 14013!NErFTWST ! RENTOWWA , ' 98055 H ,RENTOWW --> 042100-0435-06 042100..04 '09'` - FREEZE '. JEANNE1.' .0278 VENTIN : . _-CENTIT#HEIOIJ' '629999' .4009 NE ' 7TH .ST 4005 'NE17TH RENTON . WA 98055 : RENTON WA : 98056 042100-0445-04 ' . 042100-0450-06`. . MILLER 'FLORENCE • y,t C0477' 'RICE' WAYNE' Ct0E8ORAH sL '469999: 4001 ' NE :: 7TH " ST 3911 <'NE 7TH ' ST : :RENTON :WA , 98055 RENTON .WAk 980561 ry _ 042100-0455-01 : 04210040460-04 ROOK.BRADLEY.: M+DE ' LYNN .J ' 609999; =THOMAS TE00Y;RAY " 201076` 686'SHELTON` NE '682! SHELTON. AVE'NE' 'RENTON . WA 98056 RENTON -WA . 98056` 042100-0465-09, 880540-0070-071 • ARNOT 'MICHAEL+SANDY . 569999: :HODGES - MARK :G , :E0681- 680'" SHELTON AVE •NE . • . 40124NE '6TH '-CT > RENTON WA . 98056` RENTON :WA &98055` 880540-0060-09 092305-90414117'' .'.:.. SMITH :GLEN .H E0781 ' •.DYSON - ROSE ' - 101897 4006 NE 6THCT '673'UNION 'AVE =NE. RENTON WA- ,98055 : RENTON'',WA ;98056 880540=008005 102305•9309-05 ASSAREH SUSAN- MARIA . 500653 ;'FREEMIRE ' STEVENtR . :0279 4018 NE 6TH . CT ; 13215 , SE 120TH' RENTON'WA 98056 . :RENTON '.WA - 98055 - 102305-9318-04' • ' 102305-93241.06`. ^ ' RUSSELL FRANKLIN H . E :MARI©N721652 '. 'PORTER•� JOSEPH W '409999` 22023 :27TH AVE SE 766 UNION- AVE ^.NE MAPLE VALLEY -WA : 98038 "RENTON WA' '. 98056' 102305-9325-05 . 102305-9326-04•' G E -G. ASSOCIATES '0179 . . G;:.6' G ASSOCIATES. >01M PO. BOX 4148 PO:BOX 14148 • BELLEVUE WA . 98009. : BEL'LEVUE ' WA • • , 98009' 102305-9007-00- RENTON SCHOOL= DIST403' : 712777e :435 MAIN AVE ' S >RENTON .WA . 98055. • \)