Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLUA90-150 . VICINITY MAP ,I INDEX I r_ I 3 3 - L -- '' u- H_, ' � CS COVER SHEET +�/ _ A-ISITE PLAN ///�\\\\\\ �IIIIIII��,II p1I-�-- A-2 BUILDING ELEVATIONS ` // /-----�\ Ir C I� i,'', A-3 LOWER LEVEL PLAN L 11� 11� _� \ I -I—_— A_5 2N FLOOR PLAN - __ I'n /-I A 5 2ND FLOOR PLAN I -' 'p �d A-6 3RD FLOOR PLAN ,,, ❑ a '--f,!! (' A-1 BUILDING SECTION A-A / TYPICAL WALL SECTION - '_1 I i '`'' \- A-8 BUILDING SECTION B-B / PARTY WALL SECTION p L ///qqq\\\\\\ //�/�� C-'�F-� N I A-9 BUILDING SECTION C-C 1 r I a t om_'—a•'L ul •.,.,, ,/_, A-II 3ND FLOOR FRAMING PLAN �'t- i F �', A-II 3RD FLOOR FRAMING PLAN • \✓ A-I2 ROOF FRAMING PLAN •N l----r -'e // A-13 INTERIOR ELEVATIONS / EXTERIOR STAIR SECTION ! "I C27-11 \' \ A-14 MISCELLANEOUS DETAILS :1 L` 1- i / 5-I FOUNDATION PLAN TT1 =r "_ - 5-2 POST-TENSIONED SLAB DETAILS ' - - ---"- i---I, ( _ '^/' S-3 STRUCTURAL DETAILS I I 'j_I -• �- -";,1 4 i'.-"'i ✓ L-I PLANTING PLAN 1 DETAILS 1 j' C-I STORM I SANITARY SEWER PLAN _�_ _ C-2 STORM I SANITARY SEWER DETAILS II, __ - C-3 WATER PLAN /' /\ • C-4 TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL j'/' P. j'�,.� \1 III REXTON, WAS — --\ G TO \ . I ,; THERMAL PERFORMANCE DATA CODE DATA I. CONSTRUCTION TYPE - TYPE V-I-hour THIS PROJECT HAS BEEN DESIGNED TO CONFORM TO 2. BUILDINGS ARE TO BE SPRINKLERED CHAPTER L-PRESCRIPTIVE PATH REQUIREMENTS OF THE I I 3. OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION - R-I W45HINGTON STATE ENERGY CODE 1 4. ZONING DISTRICT - R-4 CEILING R-3e BLOWN-IN CELLULOSE 5. TOTAL LOT AREA - 1.656.8 5Q. FT { WALLS R-IT IN 2'#'WALLS L. TOTAL BUILDING AREA - 8.428.5 SQ. FT. r--,..l EXTERIOR DOORS R-I4 MTEAL INSULATE, 1. PERCENTAGE OF SITE COVERAGE - 31.35 % ' SLAB INSULATION R-10'STYROFOAM'OR EQUAL 8. AREA BY USE - R-I - 4.028 / B-3 - 2.400 RIGID INSULATION 9. TOTAL NUMBER OF PARKING STALLS - II 10. TOTAL PARKING t MANEUVERING AREA - 3802.5 SQ. FT. ' NOTE:THE CONTRACTOR GLAZING PACKAGE SHALL II. TOTAL LANDSCAPING - 3.310.3 SQ. FT. CONFORM TO TABLE L-2 SSE CLASS Ts THE 12. PERCENT OF LOT IN OPEN SPACE - N/A CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT GLAZING PACKAGE COMPLIANCE'DATA PRIOR TO ORDERING IS. TOTAL RESIDENTIAL UNITS - 6 14. TOTAL IMPERVIOUS SURFACE - 4.344.5 5Q FT -lsi IG"-F _-'L:. .�./t <"' H r DESIGN TEAM ARCHITECT: DDI - ARCHITECTURE I PLANNING 5540 !eke washngton Sited r e. IrklRrd.uashngton 98033 (206) 822-1124• STRUCTURAL ENGINEER: CHARLES VOELKER'ENGINEERING - - - 903-5th avenue.cute 102 ' • klrkland.Wash ngton 98033 (206) 821-0191 CIVIL ENGINEER: TOWNSEND - CHASTAIN 40' south 3rd avenue bent.washington 98032 1204) 854-2043 1 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT: OTAK.INC. 25 central way 'Kirkland.washington 98033 (206) 822-444,, LEGAL DESCRIPTION BEGINNING AT A POINT SSO.T2'WEST AND IL'NORTH OF THE CORNER COMMON TO SECTIONS IT.1e,19•r 20.TOWNSHIP 25 NORTH.RANGE 6 EAST,W.M..IN KING COUNTY. WASHINGTON.SAID DISTANCE BEING MEASURED ALONG AND AT RIGHT ANGLES TO THE LX!BETWEEN SECTIONS Ia AND IT.THENCE NORTH RL.9$'. THENCE EAST IIS'.MORE OR LESS.TO THE WEST LINE OF BURNETT STREET: j THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG THE CURVE OF SAID STREET TO A POINT IL FEET NORTH OF THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION IS: THENCE WEST LT.96 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING: BEING KNOWN AS LOT 10.WOODS ADDITION TO THE CRT OF RENTON,ACCORDING TO THE UNRECORDED PLAT THEREOF. 30' IX SIN' 114.10' y I . // W ; ; ' jam, -r '% .• j ' ^,;f:. I 0 ,'/ %;';i'/,/,';/ ;'/ ;i%/i/// //.// /.'� ' Via' //, /,// / ,/ / r //�j�j DRIVE T • ' '/"/,�'// :'/•i/�/fir',/,j%/.'// // co m % �U) I / io /i ' ,jam --/% / •%,;/•, 4/ /` 4 I '., j = / n�`V 11'HIGH W.I.RAILING , •/ /' A. I ( U- 1,1 -NEW 6'SIDEWALK > /•/ L1.95' 1 • • O\ N 1TH STREET Zvi ;If'I B1LZi SITE PLAN SCALE: I/8" = I' O" . ., = .—.- . . . . • • . . . . . . +,.,444.,11'111,,eiqi,li1p.i, ...-.....,v„•-• •. .1. .........-..., . •.:7 -r•r'i:i':i!iiZii»-F-;.1? 'T.t Z:'g• !_..-_ -- , ... *wi.l.','.!,444 • -• , * •• - Fo',il.ii';'Illle.'4-E'il.f '''''ilka146.1::'- :-IrVite#,,Y# • , - - ,:i,:.,•,,,.,,,,,., •e-r•r4-•!•,.....,:v7 26.0 F /\/\ ?,i!ii,V,Ipl,r,ilqi;F , --1.' • .4,..T.4.... 3RD :1,G. .'' ' ' , . . • ... , . . '• .. . 7.;i:1;!,!,„;,...„. 1 . .. ' :•.- . OBOE 3,0 1.,.00,, .. • • Zinn ' • • 1.:11 • • • i vs / . gin. . . ea.: . , 6E. . . - •. • • . .1 in!•.1 . 111M filii ow mu 111 MLITI ' . . • 71:1; .1 ' a 4-'.1 _ . ' .• ' , • -• I ,.... .---- .--- . •• ilAr.in.=pen ,, .1111111112651611. . 2,40 1...00R 1 ' .__. I'''''•-•"..v. •. . EIMMIMISIMIllIMINIMere' ma' MIMI • ' ' •iiiiiffill j 111111.,.......7.111114FriallerAIWI...c..,.7.1. .. ....,12=7:41721741,11MAIIIiIIIM=Itir4=ail. gra=. .•. I.% •111641•111.1aRMI.114111.01110111•110•010.11111•900•114,M1110 1111.11.1.11M1 .11,9• • 011.11 _111.111111111111111111111111 'le . , ,o, ...... .ca.. ''..'`". . • IMMIll i, ._• _ 1 — 4 / . GARAGE 4LooR',.. . .., . - - ' -SOUTH ELEVATION WEST ELEVATION _....-- . ... . FITE, / . ... ._ / • FZ FIM \C''''''ZiVPAVYRMF'<i;30TV. ,' , wiTHIry.0,_, I - •-,-- _... ,- ;'-'-`:, ' ,, i ."' j ..1U1... .. .. " \ '• L-•-• ; -i. 1 • - - •. . .. • . . v7i,.;.:.!:14.r.;:! !:f.i9,:!iii,!;,r,4;::f.;i.:r, i ...,. - .... . ••r414,,..,...,::.ic,,..•-•:!:!:.....4„..!!!!JI:::,•••\ — -:- i. Eli':;i:i:isq!.'!'jr!::;:::!til;;:-riL.I'lln;;4.•. . . :'. ' ; . ..'•. T.S':Tiii:.':;:i.jj';!!!li*!!' .-`- -z- 7 • - -.CLA55 B col,own.wmAilig4,411 , • •' e#,\ 2:•.. . ;rrYi''.P'f'''''' —' •... • ..•:•'• ......• ME - "...'''!.."--,Y!'.!-'!' '...''.,-- ...,-.. . .. . -.-- , -.. . -..• ' .1 ;,. ., • .- ' " :-71 1.1.(7---7 - ,-- ..•' ---I' .. " • "":-..... riV91942 IN ACCORDANCE WITH •:.:71 b .F...:,....:• . ... . . • • - . . • . u --_- .03. I • -. . .. . . . . ____ . . 1P.•MI.@ •• . hi:till r.:. pin_ .... 1 .......:. •.-. 1.,:z: ..• -. :11: .. . , • •-. .. ,116,6 iat . . sin :. :.•• • .". .•• 11111. li ' 'IIIN i S. . '•. %; .....-.• • ., ' 11101•1=411 . - , . •.....• .. :•. lin•ii Jilni ... . Ms ijini. '6 111111 MOM 1 matmommison mml pmm m lo ." mim wara:;":;t4Mik,_ ETTIF L.4 : r=."LI 6.' ....* 1.........I amps 111.101111/1•WM10.11....Ns...wow moms III VW"1.1gli A '"ggartikarbrg* .-raih so mil '.0/411014Mf ...§...piNpreiratain .-,.mpr."..mm,,,,:::r.1......1.,,,,1.,•••,...Z. ''' it:::::::ul_tvr,1:::::._,.!—,,-..; ;.1-.•mot:::::::I:11"::r'. ....nangt=rm; •„,r.r,-9 us Nip mougatomerz...„.., ,v_.imil aala s...... .... 11•1••••.•••..Mall. • ,B tin*-41#1.. . ZNI•••••••• ••=1111-11ariiiiiiiV11.=7", ronvenr-lattranw........-...r. pr.,...,.77....„-,-,- _,-,•ip w,, , , .,i..........T-a......- .. ..w......, ,-, ma ...SAS . .._.... ........ . . m.„,,,,,,,,,...„,,,....„,........„„„........,,,,—,.... sitit V.' ...-,,,., . ,'s. ''-,• .-... re-W).teliNfir........WI.'. ..,W.11.-5=4. -I— . ' •. .. . 161,i L NORTH ELEVATION EAST ELEVATION r:' a t Ie I r : T • " / T[ / (:I:I r / O 0--1S . 0 II \ I11 T II 11 JI O '�•° noon uze I I Fli5E BMI O • O 0 R. ca,uoeee ggairt uareo'/ I I 1_,:j..., t - 0.•. . ... . 1 b _ i 10 r-a I' r-m r-s•• I I lo•-i / 'a'''. . 'V,• r-r, 4 I �I 4 r-c / T i'n�xmw°A:�i"r-0tow aAwza 5/ a uo•T� ,b • / LOWER LEVEL PLAN J e�.e.„. - . •• ,--- i ELECTRICAL SYMBOL KEY ' —I- . - 0 DUPLEX OUTLET 0 INCANDESCENT:Jun,CEILING 1 3.-10. 3., ,• 4,AP , I-0 DUPLEX OUTLET 13111TCH ONE SOK 0- RICANDESC.T uoos.CALL nowt,. -,—••• DUPLEX OUTLET IDATERPROOK 0 INCANDESCENT uo..mos.cool. I-e4^ DUPLEX OUTLET IGROU.PALL.INTER) OP) INCANDESCENT LIGHT.PULL CHAIN.C. 2. ' • I-Re'.DUPLEX OUTLET COATERPROOF DPI) O..INGNDE.ENT LIGHT.PENDANT.LEUNG V/ • - . r) / I 1 I ,'KO DUPLEX OUTLET(FLOOR) I01 INCA.SSCENT AUNT.REC..D.CE.1G !7 I . RR.DUPLEX OUTLET'GARAGE DOOR OPENER) 304 INCANDESCENT LIGHT.SPOT.CEI.G I 443 OUTLET 13 un..220 V.) .CII. INCA.ESCENT LIGHT.RECESSED SPOT.CLC. 1 I 1 0 OUTLET IHARD DIRE.KO V.1 L__I PLOURESCENT LIGHT.SURFACE.CEILING CID -al- SUoTCH 11 POLK 02 EX..,PAN -V::,...:Y.- 1 i 1 i lIggabe '..34,_ St0TCH 13 MAT) co LIGHT/F. t -,--,•.; . 1 ,..,,I 1 1 , i•••-ss ostsco IWATERPROOPI M..,HEAT.LIGHT.FAN U. 1.-3060 SH - 60.0 N9 4036 H9 • T7! 1 • .g) JUNCTION PO% .F,-,DOOR CHIMES • ••— 01.1B..=.r. _ 9 ci:11.4..___ . ,„.. THERMOSTAT •-).. BASEBOARD OR WALL HEATER .;.'Ir.s''. 2 % ME, , Al . 641 'nose DETECTOR IU0 V.) 1=1 ELECTRKAL PANEL.CESSED IP1121 '.-.... - rotudis fh . • ,.24 A, y TELEPHONE JACK.WALL .1 gl. j . .L0 IN•115711r, .• . , ' -11 TELEVISION CABLE OUTLET.WALL 1 .2 iliN ••©38 10) CDTES BUTTON ,,. 4 . 9•• Q ir )•<:1-k**,1!,1; .IIE- 1 1 .0 § : LIVING/DINING \ €0 011,1,',7•-•-,..1 is i , „.. .- BDRM-2 . DOOR SCHEDULE : FINFSH SCHEDULE I ., ‘ \ . 1, 3'2. 1,.2 4. 21••): :_.1,_ '5'ii ga7/78:.•;15n';=,......s• , T r 04 SQ. FT. risal!..),T,....::I It''',"1[1,1 El J , I I.• .--L-- ri ?i, l'.-..• , :f.. ' ., ' e ,.2 0, L"0 . 2 ........ ). , .- - ......:ni,scalt tun . ✓ 0..0,, --Th 1.1! '•••••,_ Awl , , • . b 2. '/ ,•-i, ')3/,.••°..,... i or o ,1-1 P'S'O''' Lt:, r.• r, il ;:i.1•7 ...e.c.00 o..m. i•• " , --- 0---• .Zn 0 0 o ,10 u. U . .7,1 2 .11:Z1774, ".'' ,AIIMI itilh M''.v.'.74, ' 1 r•-,. Av, i ,i) ,,.0.,., - --; b,./ .-7\41 r 3 FLU.-WOOD 20,68 . AD 14C 34 '-.L. 3.1 Lig,19.1riar 0 PLUSH-w000 ssto . . NC 3.4 ; Id ie, f,„:46-.7gcso I BoDRM 'W FLUSH-WOOD 26.3. . WO NC 34 ).1 • •• u swer up,. WARDROBE Da- ... 1 .,..• .0 1,. •• AS '18 g,I Mr • 1 ' b :11; 111.,: ll,twtrioizirila.L„... . §1 , . el '2 Ili 1 . i.':''. ' ' '49'' MTh Ank t. 1,, ...NEI. L,, „„)st-rous 2040 NR DO▪ HC 3. •t•• O : ',.•;.• • kIli•. . . '. ' nu, - - -- ---i- e BI-FOLD WAG . RD HC ;0., It ...4P5•1,5 041,044Q 4' . ... los os-rom 306e NR RD He • IS ,I0, .. 4D , .- -,, .! El.- • '..'..‘..) AO Bosom IPA. 4018 NR . NC 5 • , 2 , .,,t.•L. - `? 1 ! IREERgai I (i)BI-FOLD IPAIRI SOLS . RD RC 1 . A €i)si-soLo IPAIR) 600 NR . SIC , - .- i-- _ u A g BT-PASS SOSO . SO 31C a 24, , 5" ' • (3) ,,,r,_1 2,,I.,1 Qy . •.-0 ;•.,,-_ f ,(7)IST-PASS 40IS NR . FEL e . SYMBOL LEGEND' •••••.. -' ' \,/ '—•:— . •04i' , §c, .g.,21, • - •''' c' ET-PUNT 3068 DR AC PK 8 .K1T - ' ..) J. ''6)BT-PASS 4048 NR RDZainen.);'" Z A/1. - 1 1,4 : 1°f X.•"','•:•:•.7.-.• s,!,, '1 ' CI 2 , ,_)) BT-PASS 10. NR 61D PNL 0 I ''' BDRM' 4-.2.c/I' ElAti- si-,,,,'•."<-1.Y. . ... ';l2)BV-PA. ei068 . 1110 PNL 0 . 13-, Z718.71.TN,SVEP I' , 5!i 0 t• :- S.. \ 1 / VAT • LIVING/DINING ... '..'...,,';,:"A37.Z."..4,.ea?'°-"""°' . . ,r----•,":::, ,,,,,,,,,, 1 ;I i ' • . •...\j.-.'" 'D; Mk. 'I 850 SQ. FT. ..,. ;';;;Cf.f4:51,nTigilt;&'•trjr.•,..... . , ••..w,WSCNECuLE B.K5 SNeeT i -.4-, I IV- ,, in ,i \ I I''.',., / ,)_:, ,...._ . .. .. ...,1, :. , „ •.... • ._,.§ ., • .... , -..4:zra,..,.m.....,• .....-i6 . J' t. . ..j H-.: i•g•- . . , ..• _ ---4 I-, aI .. .... .3., BEAM I. COLUMN NOTES • I r-, o • •„..,-s FF •' s....::. •:-.-,,,,,, ,. :.'{ -,- : ..--'' ' r' • - , _ - t_!"1. --:--. __ _. 1, ••.- I- :., • ,..,,,,, =._____1 , .i iT -., .. iir• i'151.,, . t . .. FLOOR-SKI ‘ -x•', •— - LIVING/DINING,' L.; • 3 BASEMENT I PEST FLOOR cor.Loop CA,LLED OUT ON . •uN,FRAM!,PLAN`NCLUDE SING A03.. ,.. ., .„.,G , !AI 11 .er4t "- '-1 :.4,1 , LB' 4 ALL M..1,..71PLE JOIST BEANS 9.1,1,6 NA,E i I... R 61 4 SQ. FT.( AI 164' '421: gi.'"::;'' w 010.lit '0",i; ' .-.1 RE.IIREO FOR SUPPORT OF STAIR 9TRLCTURE E-i!sit I3P eiv 0 10, 2,4 • , ..: . . 4-2'' :i . ,- -,. ,,-, 1.0 ilk : ;:g4 gEsE 1 (.'' PLUMBING/ELECTRICAL NOTES ':!.', 11.4, fil '..II -. rill .' ,O5:42'grl'oCTorr.:EtVio;rgstV!:•:.los.o • jr—t—t 1 .-. --= mcl...aye 2 aD 1-so- -.- - so.° . : - .4:... . .< N . . . •I...F.-.—. t ... 4.- WHERE SIDE-13/-SIDE ' VBE ISTEWTEPAMEr9IrEEETEggC=ITEJC.rTOV . I . ___ _____ • ._ . ..1 4(N) ' = I e. I I_..,,,,). • • '1S,'' t • ,• • 1 sr o , • . --- 1 .„ . • _JEI`',,_, NI ,•-b• • ,....A. FIRST FLOOR PLAN ELECTRICAL SYMBOL KEY i1' •-0 DUPLEX OUTLET 0 INCANDESCENT LIGHT.CEILING ]O- ` T-O• I t-, a ]O-e• se DUPLEX OUTLET IS•TCH O.90E) d INCANDESCENT LIGHT.BALL MouNT / 3-10• / / ,-] / yy / sEIP. DUPLEX OUTLET I3AT RPROOP) C INCANDESCENT LIGHT.EXR.CEILING -e•• DUPLEX OUTLET IDROIBD FAULT INTER) de NICANDESCENT LIGHT.PULL CHAIN.CID •eeee 0 REX OUTLET UOATERPR00!can CH.INCANDESCENTLEANT.PENDANT.CEILING f ® OUTLET RLOOR) INLANDESCENT LIGHT.RECESSED.CBLING - w • a �.4 DUPLEX OUTLET(GARAGE DOOR OPENER) INCANDESCENT LIGHT.SPOT.ORE. ® OUTLET n Emee no VI Lp, INUNneBeENr urrLT.RErt»eo Spar.ue ,I� _ - aD • OUTLET IHARD IMRE 220 VJ j_j FLOURESCENT LIGHT.SURFACE CEILING Q _ tit- Suntan E POLE) Q EXHAUST PAN 'yam PITCH 13 VA. ® LIGHT/PAN amen nS WATERPROOF) ®„r EAT.LI PAN UNIT LII y Q JUNCTION BOX . .DOOR C)0ff> n —� ,03t N> 603E NS ] Vp-1 _.(•) Q HO>TAT a BASEBOARD OR GALL NEATER = 306 1,i0 rl yy ' •' llµt �j 6® SMOKE DETECTOR MO V.) o ELECTRICAL PANEL.RECESSED FF —,,fl UP Fin 6 N r�i �LTY1 HONE JACK.BALL EaFu nll Lo ^I!! IN- -0 _• TELEV1310N CABLE OUTLET.MALL - ©�� F ' a 4. I _ O 'S �_ -0 CHIMES BUTTON DOOR SCHEDULE FINISH SCHEDULE DININ °p,D�,1 [i4 ■♦ > / BDRM-2,' =:I,v ]•_3•/ -, v I1 L w w w o ,E TN�H _ .• � �` ,. I. • ' 0 D D u o • - Ma wAaDaoBE a IZD MN PLUSPLN> _mDDD RD x ausr 0D R:, w v ` "GNFLIvNGRo0MLi !J ©w�IIIIlE' '� • Sm3 vsr ODD W 3.1 y.)nrrovo 201.8 NR 00 NC 1,0 8 - ---,i; Sd qYo D OLD son NR .U5R•S4R R, _ ENT cLD ,�� � I; • ..«�. 1 F. (na B_POLD Ott O ---'--_ ------ -' a, a,M P L S =W - D a /.� u • B1-POLO IN) sou D r-- -- --------- , \ \ • .#'___ I' t •\ os, T-PA»PAIN WO ND . o w w� _:;- �lain !! ,d,' `.,, - . aT-PA :ota BD P i SYMBOL LEGEND — ;; :s•:\ t►'.0 ,�}BT-PASS 3oH mD lNT.CLO ` _ L� f0 ST-PAS! BD /, >eF„•LESS A-O 'L - II1, I'`• 'il DT-PASS 606a NR wD PNLB <,e<ERM,T.9we,r LIVING ROOM. © 'Cj - i; f 1^ Raa �.;•'1q y'" LIVING/DIN6NGit �j ('! ea so Fr nJ R.RERHM ,a . TI_F,.Tw, ]H 3T . L>.Pa Ta l • e AA� A\.,��I i 'j,1,.•; :�. BEAM t COLUMN NOTES \ \ �� ' ��" - ' 7 4 • •• • ;: �72,s.r EE.Er Eao urgsVi ENG M p y V. I s F-: - NOTED A NILPq%A-HNPORS DIAaRAMMATC FRAM,AG \ \ - / ` _ ��" t0 i DeeaR s STUDS•5 EACH END oBFIN"NE0000'>T:"Lo`wEa 71 `� �1, 1II �\,� / • _ ' BATEMENT FI T F COLUMNS CALLED our as // kg. H MULTIPLE LAN INCLUDE KING POST. �_!// I'll R!11 '\\V ww 1., ALL OOIST BEAMa SMALL NAVE In].BEARING I _ _. >O O UNOE,ACH..ST.CH�:� F .. DININ ® 0,?40 � i,,l uI� . 9 W, 1 Alto, I I A iR 9TRUCT 4,• ` qtv PLUMBING/ELECTRICAL NOTES � V _l:, LOU I w II I31" I IF a I e_ Ne LEFT E OF THE DRIER '-1048 SW 1TeM L 4031 H> • u'1'.s \ - ~ • • ' • TM BE DETERMNED BT THE ELECTNDAL GBNTRAGTBR. • DEDK ?. - 1 A , R a -' • NY-t -O' T-O' 3'-q• I-D• ,'-]' 3'-]• T->• / H t' / SECOND FLOOR PLAN 1 2,210 50.FT. ELECTRICAL SYMBOL KEY 6 DUPLEX OUTLET 0 INCANDESCENT LEANT.LEUTIN i memo(CUTLET MARCH ORE SOSE1 0- E O MEICENT LIGHT.GALL VOMIT E1 DU 4. DUPLEX OUTLET(WATl1PROOR ]Tt' t'-1' ]O'-a 0 DOCANDCltalT LEI(T.EXR.CEILING •••' DUPLEX OUTLET(GROWS FAULT DOTER) OH TCOTOCICENT LIGHT.MIL WAIL CID N-t IT-OP '•••'DUPLEX OUTLET IATERPROOI N?X -O\MGNn SOnT UGNT.NEIOANT.CBLNIG p_U• TO' miner D PLEf TLET moon) fl Pr.-M.ICENT LIGHT.RECESSED.CEEIO 6•••DUPLEX OUTLET(GARAGE DOOR OR'NEIO 101 NG10ESCENT LEGIT.MOT.CEILING Ft• _ _ _{ B OUTLET If MEG=0 V.I UC1I DOCA emo:T woo..4CES!®SPOT.CLO • OUTLET MARS®EE]]O VJ j_--J PLOIEQlCMT LIGHT.SURFACE.emnic dD ! TCH ea: O EXHAUST PAN !RETCH CM LICNT/PAIN 'EN- !ITCH IEATERPROOP) �.HEAT.LIGHT.PAN NOT !E.¢LE!P•q 0 ATCINTN DOR B DOOR CURD - TI®MOSTAT =BASEBOARD OR PALL HEATER it ~~ ICI) 6® ano.DETECTOR ILO V] =EIECTIECAL more,RECESSED • y TELEPHONE JACC GALL Z . I . TELEVISION CABLE OUTLET.MALL I _ ' IR!BUTTON 1! -CI CIf . v V -T I DOOR SCHEDULE FINISH SCHEDULE {• DINING BELOW BDR e2 1 Y - • H zm m D : .TEE _ • � / D PLANT LEDGE ~ i �� •D cu,oe ', P I! a� # liplavRv �/ O I = E w w I � i \�© 6 OA�C2�1• CI 4 o o o a GARDRODE 3. t,I-PAS! ul •. LOFT o {PANeL-STEEL fou ao MIX nn x u1ai 3 • a 1°e P. 0 14 P. • 305 SQ FT. .e EXTRUDE- 4E 20 mll DTI C 1 V _3 . .9 �, :~ - PLUS - ]Ot RR RD NC 3A n¢ Q f • • ® � ilililir PLUlN-W000 ]1u NR v0 NC fA - O TRAr ,® yiRWN-W000 MR le0 NC 3.1U 1-�'U -E' I .( PLUSH-WOOD MR SOD NC).1 w L----�.,.J9 M-POLO NR NC a II Y ('17PI I •'�'i.P�' . i. EI-.OD o MR MD NC W L.. m w SM.. .•RM-1 I,d1(y"ot z�����!i�i�,r����i���tql 1117 �1��/ 1NR GD HC _ Q�:. C. F %�-.2.�.e !��y iw�l p3 LD PAIR w{. - d� t!'ca i � �� H•-,• !-a ii -• SYMBOL LEGEND ;NR PNL �B �1NR MR MD,.)..•,�. rExwaisTMP<ET 1 '110 r•` �GAjiAk..Aa � �Ir _____•/ q 0 _��•..► is�i.e.� ��. lii tl G as ( N„�, BD.Ir-1 •N.4PIR N nA)Tv oNtr `t'z'.— 0 CO` ___c1 i® ri 1IL OLJI BEAM ! COLUMN NOTES WARDROBE a t'aR-PA53 / • e ' ALL N A SNAIL NAVE m],BEARING - T P X 3 30 • , l e DEROAN�EE.CH ENO uNteS!OTNERYUSE E11'1�---- ]. �E°'eT 0 iii PO/n-N POR OUGRAnnAne PRAnMG }[� PLANT LEDGE w!L• - - (,r �F ETAR.ALL OPEbNG!REOWRMG T.I.E.NAt ' EARi gG TUD!•EACH ENO OP HEADERS.LOwER 4. Ywrra9 .E FLOOR COLUM1NS CALLED OUT ON -{• OI IN JA.Erz aNHLLGLPHAV!ST BREAMS ODES BEARING DINING BELOW • •I 6 REE STAIR PLAN!ON!MEET -3 M1NlE • I • EOWRED POR 9WP04T OP STAIR 9TRUC�u4E. BERM-2 • PLUMBING/ELECTRICAL NOTES 1 1 L • L - OEDN/C eii aloeHAL r"weETUE 1 �f�R��G�.EEEE�EEEEEEEE► . wN R - • !Ee E EVS'OR ] UOU!LIE 4C[r!,' -------- ,e • 11T. • 1/ . T-OP 3RD FLOOR PLAN xaE•vA .r-a • lit 0 Q Er i=t i El12-4� Q 0 R-4 I-. (�-3 Q II J rz-3 C7 ❑2-4 ❑ Q 12-3 • ❑ ❑ C I L R.-4- C 1 :C1.-_ b s Col sr . = ❑ n ( )t 1 V) D :DUPL. : 4 p P d (2-4- Q. . ' EUT Q d 1--I -� • 5F cv R-4 0 v., ❑ - 12,-4 5r- lowQ? I= o Lir-m-QlL�,d a- El .i 8-1 Q �� Aft fir/ _ 5n. 7Ttt Sr -vas-r-3 - -ni AV s S . T i PAPS . s rzFNr1' - i 1 i SHALIL sUS sronh, \ 1=t2E1[oHT kU1-1D V.) L- I . L o 1►.Ie- G . II I . L- 1 i I N -1. 1 U 1 1 II sc....kL!~ I'I: Zoo'-o' -I 1 Kiel Gt 1-1801ZHcr3a DF-- AI I- B-I 1 (033 BLlIzN AV S I; IToN WAS J v LY 20 19°1 O -- VICINITY MAP j INDEX 633 -. I - '—• 'rJ•- F /////��`�\\\\\\\ \/-/7- //A��\\ ��It�I—I p1' I L -"]-/ \\ -L/y( / \\ 1\ li--II •CI I^—;�,._---/1LLL�"\\,\l /\\\,\L /L�,\\\L �IIIIL I—dl- ILL_1JJ L -" _.— I 5 2ND FLOOR PLAN " I: /, a —� A-L 3RD FLOOR PLAN •i_I 0 a A-1 BUILDING SECTION A-A / TYPICAL WALL SECTION L,^ JI ' G_"•I C=i a-- '� `• �� A-8 BUILDING SECTION B-B / PARTY WALL SECTION A-9 BUILDING SECTION C-C PLACE I : -_ ;:I Wiz'--�.�L °iI :•TI-ii _•'\ - A-II 2ND FLOOR FRAMING PLAN I I---I. r1 F A-11 3RD FLOOR FRAMING PLAN r'!,a•F-=� ,,,; _ \� A-12 ROOF FRAMING PLAN l -YI,-. /, • f_�I A-13 INTERIOR ELEVATIONS / EXTERIOR STAIR SECTION I I � CSJ,i �` r I \',\ A-14 MISCELLANEOUS DETAILS •=-I' __ _ __ 5-I FOUNDATION PLAN V I L•' -"` 5-2 POST-TENSIONED SLAB DETAILS - - •- --• - -- ------ -- ----- ---- —�._I �; / 5-3 STRUCTURAL DETAILS —_ _ ✓ L-I PLANTINGRMPLAN I SEWER DETAILS 1 ', L .. I / I C-I STORM I SANITARY SEWER PLAN i _ I C 2 STORM I SANITARY SEWER -. • ."_ _-"-. _ - �^ / ' _'I •- • C-3 WATER PLAN --- - --- -- I- "F C-1 TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL r'• /�, `V/ __ s‘ ... . . ... . . „ , 1RE _\_To ._\_ ; .„..„.....„ ....... ... .: .., , \ i wAsHINGToN n /._ i I THERMAL PERFORMANCE DATA CODE DATA I ; I. CONSTRUCTION TYPE - TYPE V-I-no,Ir TH15 PRO.ECT HAS BEEN DESIGNED C0 CONFORM TO 2, BUILDINGS ARE TO BE SPRINK..ERED CHAPTER L- PRESCRIPTIVE PATH REOUIREMENTS OF THE 3. OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION ' R - WASHINGTON STATE ENERGY CODE 1. ZONING DISTRICT - R-1 CEILING R-SR BLOWN-IN CELLULOSE 5. TOTAL LOT AREA - 1154.8 50. FT WALLS R n IN a WauS L. TOTAL BUILDING AREA - 8.128,5 50. FT. -__--1 EXTERIOR DOORS R-HI mTEAL IN55LA-EDI 1. PERCENTAGE OF SITE COVERAGE - 31.35 2, SLAB INSULATION R-IO•STYROFOAM'OR EO..A_ B. AREA BY USE - R-I - 4.028 / B-3 - 2.100 RIGID INSULATION 9. TOTAL NUMBER OF PARKING STALLS - II 10. TOTAL PARKING I MANEUVERING AREA - 3802.5 50. FT. NOTE:THE CONTRACTOR GLAZNG PACKAGE SHALL II. TOTAL LANDSCAPING - 3.310 3 50. FT CONFORM TO TABLE 6-2 ISSEC.CLASS 15 THE - 12 PERCENT OF LOT IN OPEN SPACE - N/A CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT GLAZING PACKAGE I3. TOTAL RESIDENTIAL UNITS - G COMPLIANCE'DATA PRIOR TO ORDERING - I4. TOTAL IMPERVIOUS SURFACE - 4.344,5 50, FT. II - - DESIGN TEAM • ARCHITECT: DDI - ARCHITECTURE I PLANNING 55.0 :RUT eshngton alvd. r e Irkland.Aash•ngton 98033 I-O. tl :1.21 STRUCTURAL ENGINEER: CHARLES VOELKER ENGINEERING '03 5th avenue.7Vte:C2 kvt:anc.oeshngton 98033 CCLI OTT-O.l CIVIL ENGINEER: TOWNSEND - CHASTAIN 40. wtn arc a - I Lent.ue h,ngt en 9803: COG; 854-2013 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT: OTAK.INC. C5 centre::, - era,meshngtoH .8033 120LI 822-4<A5 • I LEGAL DESCRIPTION • BEGINNING AT A POINT 65012'WEST AND IL'NORTH OF THE CORNER COMMON TO SECTIONS II.la,It.I 20.TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH.RANGE 6 EAST,WM.,IN KING COUNTY. . WASHINGTON.SAID DISTANCE BEING MEASURED ALONG AND AT RIGHT ANGLES TO THE LINE BETWEEN SECTIONS II AND It THENCE NORTH PL95', THENCE EAST❑6',MORE OR LESS,TO THE WEST LINE OF RERNETT STREET. THENCE OPSOUTHWESTERLY ELOF SAIDDE EC OP SAID STREET TO A POINT IL FEET NORTH THE SOUTH LINE OF SECTION la. THENCE WEST A5 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.HE BEING KNOWN O LOT 10.FT HE ADDITION TO THE CITY OF RENTON.ACCORDING j TO THE UNRECORDED PLAT THEREOF. ` • • ELECTRICAL SYMBOL KEY 6 0R..1.MI2L.2 O MDA,DE•mrc morn m.o. ro m.LE%OUTET(e.reN oW SOM d otuloea®Ii LLrMT.NALL ma.= / -13- OI.L.%OUTLET...RPROC. •e plc...exert MN,var.cr.. / aT-t / ,_., 6•x OR.LI ROUND p%OUTLET 14 FAULT Pan) O. SICAIwCOIT LJCNT..to /OL t CH CL4 / tt-O• >'-RO' Y-t• / . COY.OUTLET MATRRNIOOI U., ON.H A O,rc NUESCDIT L .PII.AllT•can.. IP-O• T-0. ICt 0.1.1E I I] .C.N.E LOORI ISClIT L....me•.n.CO.. / / / � M 9.•DUPLEX Dural 14AI.DOo.or.NER, .0. 4.10.124.LE.IT.SPOT.CRP. / E•L /r-a -r`-r/ r-r / v ♦ OIRLR I>.Rm.a]O V.I •0' INCANDESCENT Lao.RRS]5C SPOT.LLD • OUTLET MARD 111.E]a0 V., I-J RCARESCENT LIONT.d•.ACE.CC.. afrCN S.qE, al E%NAYOT FAN i Y.TCH A.NTI CO urAR/F.N FOR GI INilRPROO" I�..WA,wMlr.FAN IS.i e1�°y f� ..cr.%Bo% , i DOOOCC ` Tl.05.2 o PEEL NEAR[. \` ♦ 1 I t-' T a _ •__ . N. 10 Snot!DETECTOR DO VO t=ELECTRICAL PANE,RECESSED I R y MEP..SAM.ALL �` I -CI nEV.oN CABLE INTER.MALL R I fl atoms Eurrox ` ` I DV I-- DOOR SCHEDULE FINISH SCHEDULE y DINING BELOW BDR 2 i w it: to n .0 V. 2O PLANT LEDGE gam) -.-- El r u i< i ° cNL m.n :.\ w P t a —~ f t. S /q N �»;'R�l /"'`—__ L $ o w rco o a m B �` \ -rr RARDROBE F All-.Asa © ill ` +• __ LOFT r D O DO . •U ..RDROBE .\(> `� I Sot. ao l.% nn ac uxSi.T a ....,4 x%e f1i ��� ti Ate"" I 306 5O//. -.a E%TeaOR 5T a0 I.. PM aC N _ '• ."� PLUM. .DOD w NC .. : O �.R o'p' iI .$ �-} } \\ T - NE Biu:OID ::" NR w m . x . •Eta.. \ p �•RM—I e M����+ ►=� �s•�� .y.`r�� �__ 1+^ a:0LO NC :u: :: L .G.....OPN.N.. j��r.t ►.; ` Q 1, -FOLD sot x. m °v` , } �:• _� �•S ►���•p� "'^^�•I } " Iy er-.OLD x, aD - _--------- F . . . , - , _ ,42. _ BY'PAaa O.PERK, MR LO _.______---_ - __- _ �I/ `r'J •� er-PASS MR .D SYMBOL LEGEND• ss���y Q 1 $ • Q ie. ill j� Ir �-' ZL)Br-.Am wu N. . B T'"'f`�L`, �^7\1P����� } B II��I .i� ,I O er PASS wu u. W.o.dl..N..... , -;i ,i• P.If ; t -n ....•.�.g 22,453 SO. ER SO PILL 0 ..H.N..T = , - II •ILI S.F v �; a V 1t VI BEAM 1 COLUMN NOTES — U DEDBE t O 65-•Asa • e N a - R e.m aHAu HAVE m].Be.RIN4 I, ` d A;i Ni:i`:oapi:.Aal END uNt•>p orxe,•.pE \ NOR.O ON PIAN PLANT LEDGB T a See D.LAu w je47.° ��Aa,e.N4'io I A w4 y_= _ C �Nr I. De IAt•NA Dlal::o • •EACH E.OF NEAOE. DER > ]EA NT IUDS] I COLUMNS CALLED OUT ON `•• O( UN • IT FRAM.PLANJOIST FLOOR KING PNAVE w].SEARING L _ UNDER EACH SDI.•EACH ENO - i DINING BELOW -- " • E ISIEE 5T OUFv09HEET -> OR CGL.Na = to¢eD roR Or STM¢FOR u.E § AN,.L T BDRM-2 / /WLI\ • • j PLUMBING/ELECTRICAL NOTES 1 ' ¢E, R B •1 .! LEFT.DE THE°,... . N.% r I-• �, . 1 - ,." -_ ] N,rEANT TD eE DE.RN N ..'.o:.:...ro.E r . ED B,T E E.EDTRN • l —._ I - tl Ro•-a �`L`r r-o• rco• T r-Lm r-r 3RD FLOOR PLAN SCUE vt I'4 ' . ,w- ir , •. ,,,,es !,:,„,„,,,, ,,, ,;:, ,, 0,,y,,, ,,,,,,!,,,,,.::,,. ,,,,,„,„.. 7:11110 ....... , . IBM IIII r1.0110. I .,. ,, ,il III ' iirg EIE . II tal'ai :ND 1.001i MINIMMINIMMINEMEMINI 1•01•10•1•••••••••siMNINSREIMEM ----sjsys_likrrn a„miff& ii ill I I Igitcpatem, til ., 1...1 . ,siii.monoirs ..87 ,,2, 5.34k7.417114.110 45.11-47Z 4.""—==ar..1 . 1°...-. —. ......... ,„. .......... , ...... 3":_„..,..diRF 3 in lu;E/4.FR F 1 -st-..,t....:, :PIIII. ,- 7"; M lill I Eat Erf, .1: --"L Lrzalcg^ t....::c- gra..=... I .......== 111^=1"EMI 1I•..._I I IMM III .. , GARAGE 1LOOR 1 • . -. • SOUTH ELEVATION WEST ELEVATION IN Fit . • ._ .,.._ ///.‘ s. 1 . —' Ill //-7. , \;Vir,!;!;,!!Tir,i,!!iii,:;i::;:;::::'://. Agi, ,::,..•:,!i.;i.i.i,....;:”iyi.,.,::,".^',, III !!';!,Y!'irq,!';!if!Y;Yiri;':'. '''' • • -'7:1:!Y!'.!;r!Y!';'...:4!.',;'. s ., . . . . . : ';'.!iir;ii.;;;YiY,' ' ,ir' • . ..!!',!:'''' .,.!'.!!'.;',!.' ,.. ''''''' EOLI— .--; !!!.jii;'!!'ir!5!!'!'•;', ,i,;,,,,,,imi,.. , .DEED . ., . . , DS D5 HI 111 . ' ... ' . "ill . • . RH . -- 31 fill . i_____.____________I )''',,, ;x0.... ..... . 4. .. .... I:En. 1 i in 1 1 ' :•..---ri 4:,...-4.;.? =is-- -fiwis.trelL..t.... . pm.. 4.1;7".4.1ht-1 re%4...i .7417.14[Ill 4..1-4*. !I:4- 41'''-'• 2""- -':::4,-.1.-*;.:-:::r:' ... - n: ii, :...A ilia.. II III r- , .".......t. 4,=. ..,..... 1..ha. r le'llatilign .. ..im..1:1:172:::.....-Atir' —. '..7317;,4:- wirar.t....v.:!....it..t..t.r• At'Oanzu— miii . -Initinelliiirilinumiiiiiiiiiiiiiiillinisiiiirimiadi •=iiiiniiiiiieihtninn.aliiinliwilitirititrihiiiieirilinihidildnuriiiii.hihoiin-inrin I riniginilliiiiiiiiiiiIRIN111101 I , . — :"- , i• • NORTH ELEVATION i EAST ELEVATION . ._._ .._ . ELECTRICAL SYMBOL KEY I . k ...) MALEY OUTLET 0 INCANDESCENT LIGHT.CEILING ; o. • . ,•//4 _DUPLE%OUTLET INISTCH ON!510E1 a INCANDESCENT L '‘ "9 IGHT.FALL now. ' • ". OuPLEN OUTLET mATERPROOF, 0 INCA. EILIN E5CENT LIGHT.EXIT.CG rg •'-'., V-3. , 4.-f• 0 3.-3. 4, 3:-P1,_3,0. .•0••• DUPLEX OUTLET IGROUNCI FAULT INTERI Ov INCANDESCENT LIGHT.PULL CNAIN.CLG 1 if '' I •0••••^OuPLEN OUTLET WATERPROOF GNI 0/4..INCA.O.ENT LIGHT.PENDANT.CEILING .,. 1•..V..! DuPLEN OUTLET tFLOONJ CI INCANDESCENT LIGHT.RECESSED.CEILING 1 il / I .....•••DuPLEN OuTLET IGARAGE DOOR OPENER1 Jo. NICA.ESCEHT LIGHT.SPOT.cf.. . • 9! ' I :,•.:) -4. OUTLET If oRE.120 V I Cr INCANDESCENT LIGHT.RECESSED SPOT.CLG i <4::1 IV ' 1 • III OuTLET INA.ORE.220 V I 1...j FLOuRESCENT LIGHT.SURFACE.CELING , .1: I • , . PI SoTCH II POLE. ® EXHAUST FAN I I I • • i ...., 'OTC..t3 tu•To CO LIGHT/FAN 0 . I , .. SoTCH tulATERPROOrl 're..NEAT.LIGHT.F.UNIT PJ, ..1' JuNCTION BOY E..-.,I DOOR CIO/IES v.ie 2-3010 SH - ..-• --- 3040.4 I - • • =NIMP -i-9 . •, TNERMOSTAT r'.BASEBOARD OR PALL NEATER . 1.:. - '- ^ - , :11 ir: :21 Ili t P 1 E 4 SMOKE DETEcTOR 130 L I c-=.ELECTRICAL PANEL.RECESSED I 11,i1.6 N y TELEPHONE JACK.NALL ''''.41-1/ N 3, i' I 3 TELEVISION CABLE OuTLET.HALL • '0 , N 2A4s) • J '......-' Q 1: • i BDRM-1 . , 1 LIVING/DINING ', A-14 0 • T BDRM-2 ' DOOR SCHEDULE FINISH SCHEDULE I , •. " KIT • B,:„..t . t .. • 1.__L•I'41_1*-,_ 2-'t',.9'1. •..:, , .: 41 . 9 ii ....,. 8 tz914-1•;1°.•-- Ili • ° .1 - • s i.•it I ill D. k. 16,7:.:7"• .[ ,-,.1.s-3.1 , ... s . Tr'', :.t i. .i b•,. .., rid..y.,..'n• . °I •. ., . l'• ri. 8 I i 1 2 4 irri'...1.1.king•-• -,,.t+ 4----j---- t"-C*•...' •.•.e;rc? ,.. ,,_., ,,,, .......BE a•,a PANE.. STEEL 30. 20 PUN INTL SC 12.43.1 1 i K•ti:„Filfli...„. '-1-1). - , •.!;,- .,,,, 1,1>-.•). 1''''' .:". •4N..;rffEkelZ,Z VI'-...-.-- --' .1:. \ 6 4 _ . iiI,EnIT,E.„R.0,I,„Sr;E EL 2,•,..,F. 2 uN IT 1. S.C. 4,, t I I)ilif;:;;I::,..151-;,:,-gaz°- 1 . , .,•.31 . ''I!' ,___,fr..: .-. 1'r 5'. -.1.-'el, . ' '- "' BQ 1'I./ 4)FL....-.30012 34411 NR 1. NC 3.4 I 1 • ' 76,_,FLuS•4•a000 Still . ND NC SA ',..• • 7'7:,L64,11r,.,C2.i j,,,f),FsIBI81ElN5IlJiIN11N U-•-FFFFPFPSOOOOOOOIEI LLLLLLDDDODDO•J11W..14044N.0W13 1, 2U2234t,0t00o0LiF4o0t6F 0a. .NNNN.mIEI4Ea2I .E....0D 4. B0ItD RM 1 O . -- a i,s f•,eb. 1 0'Fw•,iI.,, ..•• 1,,._'.,,i,• I1t,1.,2,QA..•..T•.I,-4-...li\..6 qZ•e/-,,..E.• .,,,.1 1 1'•...:4%,7• ls,1i.. .. 0-•-'F1_.s4 1C)i'7 I..6!L.°s:4,,•-',L...,,_0.`,11,,.-('A,r..... )....;1i .Z0A rrF1 i11i1lf.„ AVIIF •,'.., t: :-• --,..- •.4.!. kI(,:.,IFi.,)L`5S1B51T1E.---4PPM4AAA5SSS5SSS 4.SF.E0.ON0L.OS. KN.NRR. NLLW4D000 MPPPCmIESI L F4• SYMBOL .:eLleEGE ND t:4 1 9 11. 4 il j\.r e•..-' r-,,40 t'‘,(.')• ..:S.1 in--•\. V:1:,•2-,-a!, ,9..7 • '- /C'Pf!K I• ,''-.-••••• s ..' I, 13•••• .4 r•. ..I j, q:: , .•.; .•.. 4 el PASS 100 NR VD ma 4 BDRM 1 ,, BATH .e.. .\,!_,,,, ' _ 7:i os rAss •Ose NSI 90 491.4 'F, ralc.Z.N.44 FT T. ?I°'• 0 -1- •.'. . § 1_ \ . :•.••...•..:44. ‘t°'-.- --'rn, • LIVING/DINING ',,2>;•.1.‘7,'Fii,:.•:•',Ail..",..:;"''" j._ _..... !:sr..... :17,.:;14::.Z."'''''''''''' •-•::177^,Mt.`,.,.,,..., 7.I I i 11 7^'{1,---•-.. .4.,.., .... ' I...-. IC., i t 4- . -- . , 850 50. FT. ':" .- :, ',.„.....-, • • ' . in 1 L....2. 1..k..• -. ' . . -f- '. ,/.• . ri ...,. • '.' ----- • t'+- 9 't 1 .\ 1. BEAM I COLUMN NOTES i • I::: 4 ig,•Y-. .....-..„ .. 4 ,.....0 I',1 1, 1.-E• ,Iv,.. VE-2. V MAME .... . .. . :''';."...ti.”-:•1,..•'..E.-Al•rEt5 L''s!ns"E/i..Et...::' ti ...,..; b ;31:----_ -;••-, •:-,::-, - - 1117 • ..„_'"_,g.,1_ iiip r,I..._ t t t , ...,,to i-nii-,...,.„„ .,4..4/. F • ' r F.rEX•AjEL.,,,:z.59:2,.2.7...go.r.8Z1.`.' 1. • ..N.4,.. -E44,..1 •,,-. _Elr-..---' 1.744=,,E,415•EACPF ENO OF'FEEDERS•..,,,,, 0 ..----111 i IA .. S O.N.O./NT i ENS,F.004 COLL4NS CALLED 0,ON •'--- .-- LIVING/DINING,•• !!11.*.<e. 1 i s4 . gt-, 6 , ..N•T•NI..4,..4.At.NC.JGE,L.NG POS. . r 7;.,'i': - 6,..„. . . ., 14 4 SQ. FT ' ' l',1..t;A;:',"..:''?„.:;Ii771;:,.:•„,V,t.9',L,.91" . t'h,,,8;F, 81 • .,...•1...,. 3. I -0 •":444.. ..:".44, 1 <!. PLUMBING/ELECTRICAL NOTES LSSE. ''.:'_; _ i. -7'.'',, ita' °'il .. - ,°,11 . ,-• . , i 1- .t:,..,:.E.F.,:a?t7,,17,......;.t.°,1;71,:tivr.t1.-,-A, -t---• - -r-_.__ _,--,-_--,, F-‘: - . --,-...:72.- 1.04.1 5. trErFn...45 6040 PS ._ . 03i N ° 13 ' 1 . I ' V.,Iral..7,•=q;',"9.:enit,lc"..raZ,9.:IYTt09! . DEC.. - I , • . I . • • ,,, f: , I I . i I •' - ; I :: ,• i , . ' . • 1 1 1 . , _, --- -----• - • . .. . • . FIRST FLOOR PLAN S.,,LE .4 •••0 ELECTRICAL SYMBOL KEY RH DUPLE%OUTLET 0 DICA.ESCENT UGH,.6.1. 4.-2. , 4.1lMl • .1, •111 DUPLE%OUTLET I.TCH O.MEI 0. IFICA.LSCENT LIGHT.RALL MOUNT -0x. Ironer OUTLET 110ATERPROO• C) INCANDE.ENT 1.11..T.EXIT..ILING I , 4.-11 , 4-r -e- DUPLE%OUTLET ION..MULE INTER/ OPc 111C.OESCENT LIGHT.PU..CHAIN.CLG • -ewe.WELCH 0.1.ET 1116.T2.11001.GFU On.INCA...3.D .LIGHT 1.0ANT.CRLING ;44 041PLEY OUTLET IFLOO*1 CI INCANE5.1.LIGHT...551E0.05.10 .11( <DI -ex.ow,.OUTLET IGARAGE DOOR°ream )00 OICANDESCAIT.HT.SPOT.C15211. 46 OUTLET IS arra.aro v.) CP INCANDESCENT 000.RECESSED SPOT.CEO 4C) . • OUTLET(HARD WIRE.220 V.1 1...._.] FLOURESCENT LIGHT.SURFACE.CEILING 4D -II• SWITCH a POL• (j) mural.FAN 2..,_ SCOTCH II WAY1 IDEI LIGHT/F. t .{:61 11'..' .-ee SESTCH IWATERPROOP1 n1D...,HEAT.L1GHT.FAN UNIT 21. {-2010 5H 403/. 1 /OIL 1-12_ 2-3010 5••• ,_ Utt., 0_ THERMOSTAT cc.BASEBOARD OR WALL HEATER 44 1 d$ SMOKE DETECTOR fa0 V.1 /a=ELECTRICAL PANEL.RECESSED i',:i7,g 11-14,115.10 .-.0 ..... 0 g -0 tamer.)came owner.war. 1:1141.a ;,' ". a ill 4•011.1 • n BDRM1- . Q - . DI WIN , 1,,...„:',.,--4 .n. 1 ,,z) BDRM-2 4.. DOOR SCHEDULE FINISH SCHEDULE . ...‘ MIN . 1 --3&•:: - • • ,..._..it-41-, r E :4';\-- . ...•, i; ..,i . ...„, ,,. 0 ra 0 a g Li§ i § § I, f, L :rvr--..,-, -1-illi° 0--- --. LINEN HARDROBE . P I 5 tn i 5 I E 1 aS:it"A''' ' 11111111M MOIA11.110-..-- , .:: :O./11,..6 11...TTLL ro ..2. • I.,i, a vour..A.L.60.7 • ! (S) ./.....7., ''1•.1'11‘1•Utiral:'110'0°D 741%. rIl '111°0 "CHC 1).: i i15.,I 1"Fr-714:44!"":4' ' 1i I ) 111 14 3 .i.,.. . .0 FLUSH-ROM {16 an HD 14C 3.1 1 t,_;„_, • : • LIVING ROOM IT * moo . RD it 7 1 .. 1(6"• ,...QT•14!, 0.1 '? '(.1)151-1•01.0 I.• NR . HC :1 I.'ititrall.ay...-- ' : C> (-:,-.• ietivi,.-1 .., , 1 1 0 13I•FOLO 20111 . 00 HC i, , .. (0 el-roto 21/8 14R . NC ..1 66 A cue•4.co•wow. ' 411D T ' . rd eurom SO. NR 11113 RC 1 1 :- ENT CLO •• na i 13 ' fl ;, ,-..A,. , 1..., 01 BI.POLD IPA. 40. . . RC 1 V 1 . _ _ ' 4€s ,, . 0. ,0 1/1•10113 0... SO. . vo ve 'i• 1_2‘.,....>:.•.:E.-,3 ,4'D El...11,1110 101D NR WO RC • -- . i _ .• 1 4,4 15T•PASS 10. NR WO HC NMI-•-'--7- •••7r.:•••5..-T• i(Er er-PASS 40. NR WO era• 1 SYMBOL LEGEND 1 '4111 ...... .1 .... l_so.1. ,Y, III,Ii,,)„.•0,s.,q,..,c-j ,0 15,1,155 100 . 110 ear• o •0'.f, 1 I •0\I'll.•'' ;1)'12.Xit , 01 15T-PA55 I.. NR WO nu.• ../r. VraZerntr 1 I ' )), ,.•....,),• •)). z P R 0 ET•11655 10. . . ear 11 • • 1 I.'7 in{ it k. C. II..V.N4'•• ' 111. \ A es fra•115T-PASS SO. . WO rm.a I (;) riMula........, ; LIVING ROOM T. ,...... i'. • „,,„„„„,„,„„ ,.,.., „8,1 ..., /LIVING/DINING ..„-- 'i!n3Agrgi.iik-'1171'n•- 1 Ci:•L: Tr.,7",t•• k• 1' ,_ , '0 1_ : •---• 842 50 FT 1, Q..$') - . R7Eitv.......... :,,,:....-• t . . '1.71Zil --i\ r-i)::.5)*.>....:.,--, - --- .. J 6 •---• 4.-0. I'S.•1'1•INEIV. . . . ••:- ' ../ . •14 •4 - . BEAM t COLUMN NOTES , -... s , .___ ....____. „..--- -- . • ......c.'...2,:'..":5‘.:.*: 11' '': V liti() yi b ___• 1 i:. - • r_-,, .f---71:H1 . ...',,'4'*• . ir, /t __ _.___ _ ' BLIV•filt.15:i.i.F'L.%1;r80"747•111174.21.5.a•ER 1 _,--,---.--• t .71 / '•7 \-\{ {0/•5,13 iTEF1114• 1-1\ -fr- , 1 ! 7 :1.!:fjj-KIT', Emi .,,',.,',' -1 1 3 BASEMENT I FIRST 1.214 coLuner CALLED OUT ON 11104 FRAM.PL•N ACLupe..POST ._ ..,.._. ! 'Mr DININt3 wirk ,,L1.$4,4*.'-4,ili:t 1.11.r.'''' t ': L(1/4:1) 6 SEE SIA•R PLAN]ON SHEET A-3 FOR COLOINS •i.‘1‘172g 2.,71 . REOVREO FOR 56PPORT OP STAR STRACTuRE . i :T !LA La• trri,.. • .414i, ', II In ilmiii , gn § I _ . . . _ ii'-ii. ":3. .;74;e -,,';': .4 III MUM r.. V 1 . PLUMBING/ELECTRICAL NOTES 1 ,,; ,A1• 11!1 "11omi 6 ___i_4 __25 ,,, _el.minmsliE Er. , 1 • i I • Inre'IfElEgagfrenolV4t•TiLl'., ,,,,,,,,, . _DE5C 1 _ . . . . 1 _ . 1 . ____ -_.._ ___ -.--___- • • - i: . 0 • . .... r Cr if-0' • 0 -0 0- i SECOND FLOOR PLAN . . 2.210 50 FT . . . I /!i. l IN(::. , 1. f{ , a'-•• Y-lo• • 1�'Y _-• • ri . \ • ` 1 e b § .. • 0 , I I . I I ex rwoe{we I - rree.we ee.a I - 0 1 0 il eyo c�u�-nouxreo / e mxrwtuaxes / I II__ i. I II_—_ I i J § I siT • o, T-e a r{ —'- s S • . i \ co .1 111.-1. e . . . ,..n....11.11W-r-INON 1.11.4 IV r-o•• v-a• , ar-p *{ 1Y-C LOWER LEVEL PLAN acne v. i o 30. _._____22 ,,----___ 51.1. L.-- 111.10' • LI I / / / . 1 , .. . . , PROPOSED 4—UNIT i APARTMENT .• ,. •• ••••• ., / / . . . d - • i •// 8. , •/ 0 . . • V Di . . I < O. .. .. . ' . . . . .: • • . • , , ,... , . • . , . . . . .. , . ., DRIVE . . L) 1 I . . • • ',z •. ' . • .- . . . . A / .9 ?:' • A ' (V : I . . / 111 : I • . . CO ./ / ). I I . . . . . , . . ../ •. . , , -.:" • 1 1 ! I • • . •. .,,. .' ./ ,.. I • , . , , , ./... i !II / --I"--:- _I 1 . I . . .. / Q,.• I. T-12.HIGH W.I.RAILING :., - • . . .____L____,• . ISiDMIALK------- C -.--) i• / . ---- . . _ . _._._._._._•_•_ 0.15' . . . - ,0 ' . . . . . ON . 6 1TH STREET cNi < . > . - . . . . • . \ -411111t- . . . . . SITE PLAN • • SCALE: 1/8" . . . . • ' 192305-9092-06' P,UGET WESTERN, INC • 411108th AVE NE BELLEVUE WA 98004 • 192305-9070-02 • HORBACH EUGENE ' P 0 BOX 598 BELLEVUE WA 98009' • • • • • • • • • • - i - 182805-9065-01 - • • MINERICH MATT JR - • •'• .629 BURNETT. ST. : RENTOW:WA-- 98055 • • • . .- • „ . . 18230.5".9668.48 CUGINIALEK 617.BORNETT St„ • . • , RENTON WA • 98055 1..E32309086.-06 • ' • KNOLL DARRELL 611 6th S REI7N WA 98055 • , .182305-9127-07 - WILLIAMS ROBERT J • • 619 .BURNETT AVE S . • . ••, RENTON, WA 98055 • . _ . . 7 296390-0010-.83 WARD JOHN E , • '. • . * , 604 MORRIS AVE S • - H RENTON WA 98055 • .• _ . • . _ 296390-0025-03 . ' ANDERSON CARL 616 MORRIS AVE :S . • RENTON WA . • . 98055 • 296390-0035-01 • • •. • , FISKAALI MARSHA E 622 MORRIS AVE S RENTON WA '98055 ' 296390-0045-09 GONEDRIDGE ROSS J 1711 1/2 CAPITOL WAY S ; • OLYMPIA WA 98501 - - _ - 296390-0055-06 EAST R C • v19210 4th S • SEATELE WA 98148 296390-0070-07 : GALLWAY ,DAVID . '13314 SE 181st FL RENTON WA 98058 - _ - . . . . 296390,0080-05 COURT NORMA .PERALA 619. SMITHERS ST. 'RENTON .WA 98055 _ . . _ • " • , ". ' • , 296390-0010-00- -' - . -:WARD,%SYLVIA A 604-MORRIS AVE S RENTON WA - 98055 !:296390-Q020=08 . } ARMITACE KENNE1'H E • .- . , 612 'MORRIS AVE S RENTON WA 98055 " ' 2296390-0030-06 "HALL VIOLA CROSS , ' - 637 MORRIS AVE S RENTON WA - '98055: 296390-0040-04 LAURENT ANN M 628 MORRIS_AVE S. :RENTON WA ' 98055 . , 296390-0050-01 WALLACE WILLIAM C•and HELEN 'K ' - ' , 642-MORRIS,AVE S RENTON WA • • ' • 98055 . 096390-0065-04 . - HOLM N DANIEL P JR' - : 62 7' S, SMITHERS ST . , RENTON, WA ' 98055 296390-0075-02 , - i . MEAKIN A L , . ' 7100 S TAFT ST SEA1`1LE WA 98178 r: 296390-0085-00 . FAVRO SHEARER A M 613 SMITHERS S ' RENTON WA 98055 296390-0100-01 HYLAND DENNIS D - ' 603'SMITHERS AVE S RENTON WA . 98055 182305.-9046-05 -ALHADEFF' MORRIS .J AND JOAN 6.006 TAKE SHORE DR SOUTH SEATTLE WA - ' - 98118 ' • 182305-905602 • CUGINI ALFX' . • , . 61,7 Bt NEIPST RENTON .WA ".,1 98055. ' . , • 296390-0090-03 • : FREI HERBERT A 611 and 6111/2 'SMITHERS AVE'S' ' RENTON WA ' - ,98055 , ,i 915460-0005-07 • PUGET WESTERN INC '' 411 108th AVE NE . BBEL•LEVUE WA : 98004 182305-9051-07 - CITY OF RENTON •BENNETT W 'E ' 20O,MILL. AVE S :__RENTON_ WA - —___ __ ___ _ __ 98055 182305-9060-06 '.; LI SENBEE',PEGGY .L . • 618 SMITIERS• AVE S 1:•RENTON. WA . 98055 182305-9066-00 , CUGINI ALEX . ' 617.' 'BURNETT ST:: . . ' - . RENTON WA 98055 - -- 182305-9075-09 - `GARRICK THOMAS, E : ' 10238 -66th AVE S •SEAr.LE WA 98178 182305-9091-09 • SWINHART WILLIAM S 621 :BURNETT AVE S RENTON WA 98055 , 784030-0015 DOLAN LARRY E 13525 181st AVE SE RENTON WA ' - 98056 192305-9024-09 CASTAGNO BROS REV.TRUST - 423 S 7 TH ST • RENTON WA .98057 • 192305-9025-08 -- , • ' .CASTAGNO BROS REV. TRUST _ 423- S 7 TH ST - • RENTON -WA 98057 ' j 192305-9077-05 PUGE1' WESTERN INC . 411.-108th AVE NE BELLLVUE WA - - 98004 :' • .CI I . LJ 1 I 1=1 LI I )14 . R-4 D R.-1- 1—.. I I -3 CI Ell Iz - 1 1 `z.-4 I I k-� LiE . 7 i R II I I 1 1 .-�- Elli LI I •• SF n V) •.Met.. t > cE �T g' AND � Ein / r a Q GA Pe-"I'-3 k- .4- I DUPLEX AL-L-E Q� R_4 1 4 j--i Uri-41-F mow ' Th ,� _SF = � L R-4- El \- --. I X liallri V 1 i 117 .-E-fl 6 _ ,4-- ,,,,f.,i i I ' rfrff I i_l-r-Hoj \ 4 , .4.7 ''''S 51r u�.c.6.-1-_E-27 -ri-+ AV s • � �t=Nro/ k SJ��TATI� 11 r - --I '\ 5.iZE=CvHTTI:SH\tr-: � - L. I LlQ G0 • , 0 au" I fr . 1 Ir,.. i' N L - 1 N - 1 , , 1 ' 1 v R I • I '--fe 4.1 - N Sc,A _r_ I 200I-0 I 1-4N4(G oivems,,,,Qssta„ 1 1 1 0.x I Pei& 1 1 1\1ff-1 G H OIzHmD DE-TAI L 0- I 1 (,33 L11zN T'_ AV FBI Tr*I \i/A N. 115579 RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED,M, NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED— NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL SENDER: — (See Reverse) • Complete items 1 and/or 2 for additional services. I also wish to receive the SENy::, - Complete items 3, and 4a&b. following services (for an extra `J�Li�JC4. • Print your name and address on the reverse of this form so that we can STREET AND NO. J 1 I �� return this card to you. feel /nti/3— //z�W/s/(fnt0`— • Attach this form to the front of the mailpiece,or on the back if space 1. ❑ Addressee's Address 1��/ does not permit. P.O.,7E AND, DErz r Write"Return Receipt Requested"on the mailpiece below the article number. �e /� • The Return Receipt Fee will provide you the signature of the person delivered 2. El Restricted Delivery POSTA E $ _ to and the date of delivery. Consult postmaster for fee. CERTIFIED FEE C 3. Article Addressed to: 4a. Article Number cn tam W SPECIAL DELIVERY Q Pr. Edema-Ld 601 e /5S79 RESTRICTED DELIVERY a J/ ,/��77 49,�/� L— 4b. Service Type co L. ,� /!�/� —�`TG /'�' L ❑ Registered ❑ Insured cam+ c.)1.1 c� DELLIW TO IVERED WHOM AND DATE a p y� y/�ni /' 1�/{� CR Certified El COD v H SHOW TO WHOM,DATE,AND �� ❑ Express Mail El Return Receipt f ►- ADDRESS OF DELIVERY Q Merchandise o z W 7. Date Delivery r CI w SHOW TO WHOM AND DATE / , O = DELIVERY WITH RESTRICTED C S. Sig (Addf2 eel4 NL AN I ✓ z 8c a (Only irequested SHOW TO WHOM,DATE AND e W ADDRESS OF DELIVERY WITH C '�'$j na re (A en RESTRICTED DELIVERY _ g tl/ JUN 2 9 1992 a TOTAL POSTAGE AND FEES $ PS Form 3811, November 1990 *U.S.GPO:1991-287- l L..IJ r-l-� ERV POSTMARK OR DATEOI IERETURN RECEIPT d 1S_ --9 Lim—9o—/ e,—ECC;Sq;V so m E; 0 G4 R 440 fO, � CIT -,_OF RENTON "LL Planning/Building/Public Works Department Earl Clymer, Mayor Lynn Guttmann,Administrator June 25, 1992 CERTIFIED MAIL NO. 115579 Mr. Edward Gonzalez 11015 - 142nd Ave SE Renton, WA'98056 SUBJECT: Alexander Place Six-Plex ECF;SA;V-150-90 Dear Mr. Gonzalez: The Renton Board of Adjustment, at its regular meeting on June 24, 1992, granted your request for a variance with the following conditions: 1. That the applicant acknowledge that these variances, if granted, are the total variance for this site and shall agree not to apply for additional variances based upon hardship on this site for the life of these improvements. 2. The maximum infringement into the,20 ft front yard setback on Smithers Avenue shall be eight (8) ft and the maximum infringement into the 25 ft front yard setback required on Burnett Avenue shall be ten (10) ft. NOTE TO APPLICANT: A. No infringement into the rear yard setback or variance to the height limitation is granted through this variance. This is the only variance granted under this application and all other provisions of the Renton Municipal Code will apply. The action of the Board of Adjustment is final and 'conclusive unless within ten (10) days from the date of action, the original applicant or an adverse party applies to the King County Superior Court for a Writ of Certiorari, a Writ of Prohibition or a Writ of Mandamus. • If you have any questions, please contact Mark Pywell, Senior Planner, at 235-2550. (For Renton Boar ent, Donald K. Erickso , AICP Zoning Administrator DKE/kac . . cc: Sylvia Alexander • Scott Swinhart ' Steve Polich 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 PUBLIC HEARING MEETING JUNE 24, 1992 7:00 P.M. BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT AGENDA MEETING #003-92 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 4. ROLL CALL 5. APPROVAL OF MINUTES (Minutes of March 25, 1992) 6. PUBLIC HEARINGS SCHEDULED ECF;SA;V-150-90 ALEXANDER PLACE SIX-PLEX 633 BURNETT AVENUE SOUTH Applicant seeks a variance to Section 4-31-8B.C.4a of the Renton Municipal Code. This would allow a 10 ft encroachment into the 25 ft front yard on Burnett Avenue and a 10 ft encroachment into the 20 ft front yard on Smithers Avenue. This is an irregular shaped lot with three 'front' yards. LUA-92-083-V WIEHOFF VARIANCE 2228 NE 12TH ST Applicant is requesting a variance from Section 4-31-5C.4.B. of the Renton Municipal Code. This would allow a 5 ft encroachment into the 25 ft rear yard setback required in the R-1 zone. LUA-92-077-V GLADSTONE VARIANCE 556 STEVENS NW Applicant is requesting a variance to Section 4-31-5.C.4. of the Renton Municipal Code. This would allow a 7 ft encroachment into the 20 ft front yard setback required in the R-1 zone. 7. AUDIENCE COMMENT 8. OLD BUSINESS 9. NEW BUSINESS 10. ANNOUNCEMENTS 11 . ADJOURNMENT BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT PUBLIC HEARING June 24, 1992 MINUTES MEETING #3 BOARD MEMBERS PRESENT Lee Connel, William Anderson, Rosemary Quesenberry, James Jacques and Denny Dochnahl CITY STAFF PRESENT • Mark Pywell, Senior Planner and Kathleen Childers, Recording Secretary 1. CALL TO ORDER The regular meeting of the Board of Adjustment was called to order by Vice Chairperson Dochnahl at 8:00 p.m. 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Vice Chairperson Dochnahl led the Board and audience in the Pledge of Allegiance to the flag. 3. ROLL CALL • Vice Chairperson Dochnahl announced the meeting was being recorded both physically and mechanically for future reference. A roll call resulted in the following members being present: James Jacques, Lee Connel, Denny Dochnahl, William Anderson, and Rosemary Quesenberry. Boardmembers Barbara Lally and Ellery Brown were absent. ACTION: Motion made by Denny Dochnahl and seconded by James Jacques that Barbara Lally and Ellery Brown be granted excused absences. MOTION CARRIED. 4. APPROVAL OF MINUTES ACTION: Motion made by Rosemary Quesenberry and seconded by William Anderson that the Minutes of March 25, 1992, be approved as written and distributed. MOTION CARRIED. 5. PUBLIC HEARINGS SCHEDULED VARIANCE FILE NO. ECF;SA;V-150-90 ALEXANDER PLACE SIX-PLEX 633 BURNETT AVE S The applicant seeks a variance to Section 4-31-8B.C.4a of the Renton Municipal Code. This would allow a 10 ft encroachment into the 25 ft front yard on Burnett Avenue and a 10 ft encroachment into the 20 ft front yard on Smithers Avenue. This is an irregular shaped lot with three 'front' yards. BOARD'OF ADJUSTMENT MINUTES JUNE 24, 1992 PAGE 2 Vice Chairperson Dochnahl requested a staff presentation of the proposal. Mark Pywell, Senior Planner, presented the staff report and exhibits. Mr. Pywell explained that, since this property has three street frontages, according to the ordinance, this property has three front yards and one rear yard. This would require setbacks of 20 ft from Smithers Avenue and South 7th Street and a 25 ft setback from Burnett Avenue South. The zoning is R-4, Multiple Family residential development. Surrounding properties are zoned R-4 and L-1 (light industrial development). Exhibit 1 - Site Plan map Exhibit 2 - video Mark then went through the variance criteria: Criteria No. 1, that the applicant suffers undue hardship and the variance is necessary because of special circumstances relating to size, shape, topography, location of the surrounding property vis a vis neighboring properties, etc. It's not based upon economic hardship, etc. Staff believes that in this case, there are unusual circumstances that create a hardship unless the variance is granted, this being the three front yards. To develop a multi-family unit on this property without the variance, the applicant would be forced to design a building with undesirable sized rooms or narrow hallways/stairways. Staff believes that the proposed design adequately addresses the concerns that would be proposed on this lot, along with providing adequate setbacks and solving any traffic problems. The applicant is proposing a 15' ft setback off of Burnett and an 8' setback off of Smithers. Criteria No. 2, that the granting of the variance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in the vicinity or zone in which the subject property is situated also appears to be met. The proposed structure would meet the current R-4 zoning, except for the setbacks and would improve the current unsightliness of the vacant lot. Criteria No. 3, that the approval will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with limitations on uses of other properties in the vicinity and zone in which the subject property is situated. Staff has worked with the applicant to come up with a design that would meet code as much as possible. The proposed design would not be a granting of special privilege. The project has already completed Site Plan and Land Use review. Site Plan approval is contingent upon approval of these variances. Criteria No. 4, that the approval, as determined by the Board of Adjustment, be the minimal variance that would accomplish the desired purpose. Staff concurs that the application for the 10' variance from the 25' setback on Burnett Avenue and the 8' variance from the required 20' setback on Smithers Avenue appear to be the minimum required in order to provide a building that provides adequate room and parking for vehicles. Mark stated staff is recommending to the Board that you grant the requested variance with the following conditions: 1. That the applicant acknowledge that these variances, if granted, are the total variances for the project site and shall agree not to apply for additional variances based upon hardships on this site for the life of these improvements. ' 2. The maximum infringement into the 20' front yard setback on Smithers Avenue shall be 8' and the maximum infringement into the 25' setback required for Burnett Avenue shall be 10'. This concluded the staff report. BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT , MINUTES JUNE 24, 1992 PAGE 3 Vice Chairperson Dochnahl called for comments from the applicant. Sylvia Alexander 3826 S 288th Auburn Ms. Alexander stated that she and Mr. Gonzales have been working with the City staff for almost four years to get something accomplished on this parcel. Staff has made comment concerning the 'uniqueness of the lot due to its shape and the roads surrounding it. Ms. Alexander asked the Board to grant the variance. Vice Chairperson Dochnahl asked if there were any comments or opposition to this variance from the audience. There being none, Vice Chairperson Dochnahl asked if there were any questions from the Board: Boardmember Anderson questioned the dimensions of the drawings. Vice Chairperson Dochnahl closed the public hearing and called for a decision from the Board. ACTION: BOARDMEMBER QUESENBERRY moved that the variance be granted according the recommendations/conditions as set forth in the staff report, adding a condition that there be no variance to the height limitation requirements. BOARDMEMBER JAMES JACQUES seconded the motion. Vice Chairperson Dochnahl asked for a roll call. Boardmembers voted unanimously for the variance. MOTION CARRIED. Vice Chairperson Dochnahl announced that the action of the Board of Adjustment shall be final and conclusive, unless within ten (10) days from the date of the action, the original applicant or an adverse party applies to the King County Superior Court for a Writ of Certiorari, a Writ of Prohibition or a Writ of Mandamus. VARIANCE FILE NO. LUA-92-083-V WIEHOFF VARIANCE 2228 NE.12TH ST The applicant seeks a variance to Section 4-31-5.C.4.B of the Renton Municipal Code. This would allow a 5 ft encroachment into the 25 ft rear yard setback required in the R-1 zone. Vice Chairperson Dochnahl requested a staff presentation of the proposal. Mark Pywell, Senior Planner, presented the staff report and exhibits. Mr. Pywell stated that this was also an unusual lot. The "normal" front yard is just a "leg" onto the property. At the time the lot was surveyed for building the house, the legal description was inaccurate so the surveyor was five feet off on the location of the rear yard. The inaccuracy is enough to require a variance now to allow the reduction to the rear yard setback. BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT MINUTES • JUNE 24, 1992 PAGE 4 Exhibit 1 - Site Plan map Exhibit 2 - video Mark then went through the variance criteria: Criteria No. 1, that the applicant suffers undue hardship and the variance is necessary because of special circumstances relating to size, shape, topography, location of the surrounding property vis a vis neighboring properties, etc. It's not based upon economic hardship, etc. Staff feels the because of the shape of this lot- a "leg" lot - a hardship does exist. Criteria No. 2, that the granting of the variance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in the vicinity or zone in which the subject property is situated also appears to be met. Staff does not feel that the variance would result in any problems for the neighborhood. Criteria No. 3, that the approval will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with limitations on uses of other properties in the vicinity and zone in which the subject property is situated. Staff contends that the applicant can be considered to have an undue hardship required under Criteria No. ,1 based upon the shape and location of the subject property. The granting of this variance would not constitute a special privilege. Criteria No. 4, that the approval, as determined by the Board of Adjustment, be the minimal variance that would accomplish the desired purpose. Staff does note that, according to the submitted drawings, the house is actually set 22.8' and 22.9' from what the applicant is calling his rear yard boundary line. The requested five foot setback would give the applicant additional area that would be unused. Therefore, staff feels that a 2.2' infringement would be the minimum required to bring the house into conformance. Mark stated staff is recommending to the Board that you grant the requested variance with the following conditions: 1. The maximum infringement into the 25 ft rear yard setback shall be 2.2 ft. Boardmember Connel asked if there were any structures close to the rear yard. Mark stated no, that there was a residence on another lot, but it was not set at the minimum setback. This concluded the staff report. Vice Chairperson Dochnahl called for comments from the applicant. Wayne Chastain 409 S 3rd Ave Kent Mr. Chastain is the engineer for the applicant. He stated that Mr. Wiehoff had set the house correctly at the time of construction with regards to the 25 ft setbacks because of the boundary lines that had been drawn. Mr. Chastain's office had just found out that during the original survey, a wrong monument had been used. This required a second survey be made which moved the rear yard boundary by approximately 2-1/2 ft. Mr. Chastain did not agree with staff's recommendation that the applicant record a restrictive covenant, within 90 days, requiring all future structures shall be located a minimum of 25 ft from the north property line. He felt that was putting two restrictions on the property. BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT MINUTES JUNE 24, 1992 PAGE 5 Vice Chairperson Dochnahl asked what the distance was from the house to the north property line. Mr. Chastain stated it was approximately 74.8 ft. Vice Chairperson Dochnahl asked if there were any comments or opposition to this variance from the audience. Vice Chairperson Dochnahl called for a decision from the Board. Boardmember Jacques asked for clarification of the side yard setback. Mark stated that the Zoning Ordinance requires 5 ft. Boardmember Quesenberry asked for clarification of the differences between the side and back yards. Mark stated that what was normally classified as a back yard was being used as a side yard and vice versa. Boardmember Connel asked if everything had been originally built according to code restrictions on setbacks, what setback would the applicant need if he were to build a garage in the area by the north property line. Mark stated 5 ft because no variance had been granted to any other lots. Boardmember Anderson asked if the entrance to the house was located on the south side, would there be a setback problem. Mark stated that if the house was faced towards the south then, by Code, the house would have to be moved back 20 ft from the property line to have an adequate front yard. Vice Chairperson Dochnahl closed the public hearing and called for discussion/motion.by the Board. ACTION: BOARDMEMBER CONNEL moved that the variance be granted for a 2.2 setback to the rear yard be approved because the applicant does suffer a undue hardship, the variance is necessary because of special circumstances; (2) granting of the variance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property in the vicinity; (3) the variance does not grant a special privilege; and (4) that the variance is the minimum variance needed to accomplish the desired purpose and furthermore stipulate that there be no conditions except that the maximum infringement into the 25 ft rear yard setback shall be 2.2 ft. BOARDMEMBER ANDERSON seconded the motion. Mark asked the Board to clarify that the motion was eliminating both conditions No. 1 and No. 2. Boardmember Connel stated yes. Vice Chairperson Dochnahl asked for a roll call. Boardmembers voted unanimously for the variance. MOTION CARRIED. Vice Chairperson Dochnahl announced that the action of the Board of Adjustment shall be final and conclusive, unless within ten (10) days from the date of the action, the original applicant or an adverse party applies to the King County Superior Court for a Writ of Certiorari, a Writ of Prohibition or a Writ of Mandamus. VARIANCE FILE NO. LUA-92-077-V GLADSTONE VARIANCE 556 STEVENS NW The applicant seeks a variance to Section 4-31-5.C.4 of the Renton Municipal Code. This would allow a 7 ft encroachment into the 20 ft front yard setback required in the R-1 zone. BOARd OF ADJUSTMENT MINUTES JUNE 24, 1992 PAGE 6 Vice Chairperson Dochnahl requested a staff presentation of the proposal. Mark Pywell, Senior Planner, presented the staff report and exhibits. Exhibit 1 - Site Plan map Exhibit 2 - video Mark stated that, at this time, staff had received two letters and approximately three telephone calls in opposition to the project. He also noted that the addition was built onto the house on wooden piers and without a building permit. The Building Section still has not been contacted by the applicant for an inspection of the addition. It's possible that the entire structure will have to be demolished because of noncompliance with the Building Codes. Mark then went through the variance criteria: Criteria No. 1, that the applicant suffers undue hardship and the variance is necessary because of special circumstances relating to size, shape,,topography, location of the surrounding property vis a vis neighboring properties, etc. It's not based upon economic hardship, etc. Staff does not believe that there is anything unique about this lot that would cause undue hardship. There are other areas on the lot where the addition could have been made without infringing on the front yard setback. Criteria No. 2, that the granting of the variance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in the vicinity or zone in which the subject property is situated also appears to be met. As noted in the letters of opposition, neighbors in the area feel this addition would be injurious to their property and their welfare. Staff also feels that the granting of this variance would be detrimental to the public welfare. Criteria No. 3, that the approval will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with limitations on uses of other properties in the vicinity and zone in which the subject property is situated. Staff would note that the other homes in this area have all complied with the setback requirements, making this variance a special privilege. The street is very narrow with no sidewalks. If the neighborhood were to request sidewalks to be put in by the City, this addition would show up more prominently. Criteria No. 4, that the approval, as determined by the Board of Adjustment, be the minimal variance that would accomplish the desired purpose. Staff does not believe the applicant has requested the minimum variance. A review of the site plan demonstrates that adequate area exists elsewhere on the lot for the addition to be constructed on the house without encroaching into the setbacks. Therefore, staff is recommending that the Board of Adjustment deny the requested variance to allow the 7 ft encroachment into the front yard setback. This concluded the staff report. Boardmember Connel asked why Stevens was so narrow. Mark stated that the road was developed some time ago and it's possible that the road was in the county at that time. Mr. Connel also asked if more of the existing structure was already encroaching into setbacks. Mark stated that it appeared that the existing structure may intrude approximately a foot or two into the setback. Mr. Connel further asked if the Building Section would inspect new constructions/remodel without having building permit plans. Mark stated that if someone built onto an existing structure without building permits, the City would go out and make a special inspection to determine if the structure was built to code and what would be needed to get it there, if not. Then the person would come in for the proper permits. BOAR15 OF ADJUSTMENT �, . _K ) MINUTES JUNE 24, 1992 - PAGE 7 Mark stated that this project became known to the City due to a complaint. It was being handled by Bob Arthur who is the Land Use Enforcement Officer. He had discussions with them to explain to them what they would need. The applicant has applied for the variance you have before you tonight, but he has still not requested the special inspection. Vice Chairperson Dochnahl asked Mark to clarify his earlier statement of possibly demolishing the whole structure. Mark stated that this statement pertained only to the additions, not the original house. Boardmember Connel asked if everything was currently built as proposed. Mark stated that, looking at the house from the street, it did not appear that the deck or the stairs were done and that some of the addition had been done on the southwest corner of the house. Boardmember Quesenberry asked if the entire addition was on wooden pillars or if some foundation had been used. Mark stated that part of his view from the street was obscured by a fence, but from the part he could see, it was all built on wooden piers., Boardmember Quesenberry further asked who the builder was. Mark stated the homeowner did it himself. Vice Chairperson Dochnahl called for comments from the applicant. Jose Zamora 556 Stevens NW Renton Mr. Zamora stated that the addition was built because of lack of space in the original house. He was unaware of the Building Code requirements. After the complaint inspection, he and Ms. Gladstone went to Canada to work and construction was stopped. Mr. Zamora stated he was willing to move the addition to another location if the Board felt inclined in this way. Vice Chairperson Dochnahl asked what the addition was for and why was it located in its present place. Mr. Zamora stated that they didn't want to "deform" the house to much with the addition and the addition is to make the bedroom larger and add a bathroom. Boardmember Jacques asked at what stage of construction was the addition. Mr. Zamora stated that the sheetrock was.completed. Vice Chairperson Dochnahl asked if the electrical and plumbing were all done without permits. Mr. Zamora stated that there was no plumbing in yet. The bathroom part of the addition was no done, only the bedroom. Mr. Zamora stated he had asked for an inspection but he was told that he had to apply for a building permit or a variance first. Boardmember Quesenberry asked how many feet from the old structure on the north side to the addition. Mark stated he felt it was 4-5 ft encroachment. Boardmember Connel stated that if the variance was approved, then Mr. Zamora could request his inspection. Then the Building Inspector might find that the addition was totally out of code and require it to be demolished. He didn't feel that this did the applicant a lot of good, but on the other hand, without the variance the applicant couldn't get an inspection. Mark stated that in talking with Bob Arthur, an inspection to determine the state of the building could be done at this time under a special inspection. However, the applicant could not get a building permit inspection. Boardmember Jacques asked for clarification that in the event that the variance was denied, would the applicant be made to demolish the addition. Mark stated that this was correct. • BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT MINUTES JUNE 24, 1992 PAGE 8 Boardmember Connel asked if it was possible to have this variance tabled and allow the applicant to come back with more information as to the actual encroachment,that currently exist and a report from the Building Section as to the status of the structure. Mark stated that was possible. Vice Chairperson Dochnahl stated that if the structure was no good, then the variance was a mute point and the applicant can be required to tear it down. If the problem is just a lack of building permits, then the Board can make their judgment call on that point. Vice Chairperson Dochnahl asked if there were any comments or opposition to this variance from the audience. John Connell 8502 S 125th St Renton Mr. Connell wanted to remind the Board that if the street was widened and/or sidewalks put in, there would not be sufficient off-street parking with the encroachment into the front yard on this residence. He stated that the applicant hasn't followed the proper process for building the addition so that it would conform with the neighborhood. He agreed with the staff report that the addition should be built somewhere else on the property. Mr. Connell was concerned regarding the lack of parking that already exists and potential for an even worse situation if the variance was granted. Leroy Johnson 503 Seneca Ave NW Renton Mr. Johnson reiterated the neighborhood's concern regarding the traffic problems that exist at this location and the potential for even worse conditions if the variance was granted. ACTION: BOARDMEMBER ANDERSON moved that the variance be tabled until the applicant has worked out some of the problems and can provide more information to the Board. BOARDMEMBER CONNEL seconded. MOTION CARRIED. Vice Chairperson Dochnahl asked the Board to table the variance request until July 22, 1992, to allow the Building Section to inspect the addition and for more information to be provided to the Board from City Staff and the applicant. All Board members were in agreement. 6. OLD BUSINESS Mark brought up the past concerns of the Board regarding the cost of variances. He stated that a survey had been done between the City of Renton, City of Bellevue and King County to determine the differences of costs. The City of Renton is charging $500 for a variance which doesn't cover the entire cost of processing the variance. The City of Bellevue charges $1,039 and King County charges $1,884 for the same variances. Mark stated that traditionally the City of Renton has relied greatly upon the General Fund, as other jurisdictions have done in the past, to cover the cost of staff time in reviewing a variance, publications (which can run $40-100 per case), staff time for video/report time and providing facilities for the Board to meet in. Cities like Bellevue and King County have put more of the burden of the cost on the applicant to reduce the cost to the general fund. 7. NEW BUSINESS None BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT L MINUTES JUNE 24, 1992 PAGE 9 8. ANNOUNCEMENTS None 9. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, Vice Chairperson Dochnahl adjourned the Board of Adjustment meeting. Chairperson 0 Approved • / . , ._, '.'.'.'.'.'../..:.:.:.:.:. :••••.••.:.••.......•..•..,,.....-...„,.............„........,,........„............._.........:....:.:....:.:.:•:•:•:•?.:::::::::::::::*:::::::::::.::::::::*::.::::::::::::: :::::.:iion.M:M.inaM•4:M::::::::::::....................................:: ••••:••••••••:::::•::::::::::.:::::::::::::::::::•:::::::•••••••:::•••••••••••••••••---••.:•••••••••••••••:::•:•••••••:•::x:':•;::BOAR.e.ferAt):jUSTIVIENTi :::::::::: nif: ::•::.::•:...:::: : :::: : :::: : . ....n.:::::•:•••:i: :::•.:g:.••;.::::::. •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• --...-.................................. . . .......... ..„............................................................... . .. . . .......................... ........ . .................. ................... ....................-..................--- •-••••••••-••••••••••• •••••••••••••••••................................................................................... . ... ... ..... ::••......•••...s•-•.-------••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••;.-----.-....-----•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••.•••••................................................................................. •:"::"':i:.•••........:.::::::::•'.•:•:•••::::••••:::::::::••::::•••.•.::::::::::::::••••••::::::::;;;:::;;:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:::••••:•.*::::.:••.:•:::::::.::::::::::*•:•:•:•:•:•:::::.....1•:•:•,..••••••:.,••••••::•,,,:•••••:Th•••••••.e.•••••••••••*:.::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::: :;:;.........,::::::::::.........::.::.....:::::::*;...:.............:::::::::::::::::::•......:::::.s.,....:.:....:,:....s.:. s: ::.:::•.:::::::::::•:;:•::.:::•:.i:.::::.:•?..... •••:•...s:••••••••••••:':::••:::::'::.....":::... 'STAFF-Ft try ril::::••••••••••••••••::::,:::::::•::::•::::::::::•:•-•:•••••:::••••••••••••: .:•:•:.:.:.::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::•:*••.*:.*•:::::::::::::::::::•::•,*•::•:* •••••••••::::::::::::::::::::: :::.::::::?::::::::?..:::,:::•:•:.::.:-..f:s.:•:.:::::::::::::::::x::::.*i::.::::::.* :.::.: ::::::::::::::::::.*:.::.*:.::.::::.:::.:::::::::::iii*:.::::.::.:•::.-..:•:?:: ::::.:*i*:.:J.::::.:i*Qa.....:•:*::.:*:.:m: :.::::::.*:.::::::::.:•:::.:.:::.::.::.:••.:•:::.::::.:::::.*:::::..:,....:...........::-::i:.:*:.:.::•:*.:: :.:: :.:::::""•"••.••••••.•••••••••••••••-•"-•"•".................•..•••••••••••••-•••....-•-•••••••••......••••••••••••••••••............................................................................................................................................................................. ::::::"":::•"""":::" :" ..."" *M":*•!::::'.•:::::::::::::::::0::::::::::::::::::::.::.::::::::::-•::'•:::: :::g4:::::::•:::=:::44.0.N..e?.:24;ii:...: .. 2.:::::::::::::::::.*:::::;::::::::::................„.*:„.....................:....:.„.:::::::...........::::::::,:::::::::::::.:::::.:::.:::.:.:: ::::::::.. :::::.:.......::::::::::::::::::::.0m •••••••••::::::.:i:if:::::::::::::.::::::•:::: :.::::::..i....,:•::::.:::::::::•::::: ::*:::::::::::: ::.:••.:••.: ::::::•......:...:.................:•::.•:•:•:•:•:•:.....:.::::•:*:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::.:.:.:.::::.:.:.:.:::.::.*:.::.:................:.:.:.:.:.:.:.................... . . .. ... ................... BACKGROUND :'.............%.................-....•..•..................-••.••••••••••••••••••••••••-................•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••-••••••:•:••••••••••••••••••••••••••.•••,............................................................................................................... ,.. . ......--—.v..-—----v..--...••.•••••••••••••••••••••.......................•••••••••••••••••.••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••-.....-•••---•••••••••••••••••••••-••.••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••....................•••••••................................................................ • :......:i:•::::::•::•:::::::•'16-%:.0:-.11•::n........ ........:::.::::::::::••••••••:::•':::**•':•::::::::::•::•::•::::::::::•::: :: :: :••••T:Ed•Gdhzai.es/Sylvia:•Akexancl.p.!.,ri:••.*•:*::::::::: ::.::.*:.::.:•:: ::.::::::::.:.....*•::•::•:*•.......*:.........................:::::............::::... ::::::::::::::::::::.:::::::::::::4„.....J....4.1A.N.T.,....: :.:::•*:.:: .sgmig::.::::.:::::mo.... : ::.::.:0;•.•:a::::..................:.:,.::::::::::::::::::::::::.:.::.:::::::.::.:K*i:i*:.:?:::..iii.....x..............::...::: : ::::: **::::::::::::::•::::::::::::.:::.:„.:.:.::::::::::::::::::.:...::::::::::..........:. •:•:••••••••••" •'..P......R....h.::::::1::.:.P...:.::rri'...f::.::•.:::::.••••••:.:.....•••••:.••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••:::.::: :::••• •••••:im::4::* ::,:.4:kekarklerSii6P106.Q... ...usiiis:::::::::::.%::::m::::m.:Wiia::•••:•••:::::::.:m. . ...:•::04: •••••••:•:::•:•:•••••:::•••••::::::,.......;;_4,......::::•••••: ::.* ::::::::::::::::::::::::.:•::::::::::::::::.:::::: : :::::.*:.a:.::::::•:::::::::.....:...„...........:::::.,..:::.:....„..:.i..,..::::::::::::i,;*.:: ::::::i...:,.....„...............................„.......,..:.........................:.:........................:::......:::a.i.......::::....i.:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::i•:•:::::::::.:::::::::;.:::•:.::::::•:,:•:•:::•:•:•:•:•::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::.:::••.•:::::.:::::::::::::::::::::::::•:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::.*•:*„..::::::::::ii:::::,:::•::•::::: :: ::: : :...................„....... ....,..„...,....„.......:..................m............:::::::.::::::::ii..ii„....,*::::::::::...... .. . • •::::':::.::::'::::.::::.?..:...I: .. : ....•.::...::::::•.:::::• :::::::::: :::::::::::::::::':: :::::4, ;46t1.4:V.E.OF.::::::;i:.;,::::•:i::•:::•::,:::::::::::,::::i:i*i:i:i:i...„*i*;:::::::ii:Aii...iiniiiiiii:,Aiiiiiii...ii...iiiii.:iii:iii.:iiiiiiili:. :::;:!:::%;%;::;:;:!::,:::%;:;:;*°°°A71.:1°N.::NIG':''':::::::::::::::.:::::i:::::*:.:::::::::::.:::::::::::::.*Ui*::::*:.*::::.......*:*:.:::.:::.:*•:::.:.:.::!..i:i:!,::::*:*::i..i.:::::::::::*!::::: : *..,.:..:..:..:..:,:..:..:•.....,........,..,...,........................,.......:........................,......................................::::::::.i::::.i::::.i.:..:::::::::::.::............::.::::::::::.:m..::::.f..........*:........;::.......,...........:;::.::...........::.:;:x*:,:m*,:..,.:,:..,.:,:..,......,....::::,:..:..,.........................,........,................:::....:.::::.:.:.:::•.:;:::::.. ......:H:i :+....i........:.,....i.,:-...::::::ii,:::::::h:::::::::::::::.::.::.::.:::::::::::-: ::: ::::.::::::::.::•••••::::,.... ::::::.•.: '::::':•::::::::.:::::•••:::::.:.x.:*P1.:.:::::.0x...........F.i.Y.:::::•:.:9::::::.t.:::::.::::::.t..:::::•"::::0:::iiii:sil"agnn•441iiir:i:.i:0010,4iii #044.*Or.r.Opcp....i:tspp..9p9r. ::gi ;.:.:::::'::.:•:::.:.:•:.::•: V-....--''•::.:.•....•••.:.:• ':9:.:':::'::':::•::::::::::•:;::•:::::::::::::::::::.::::::::::: ::::•::•::'bfiffd R i:: giifjiii Mifti16tkai•i:•:.04d0:.:: ;fik.WOW.4..:410k*:lP:•:.:ft ;;;;••••:::::::::::i:::: :: : :::4:::::' :-..:'.. """"""""""":::•::::::::"".•::::::::::::::".::°:MM:li":.....g:e:...:6646hhiefii::::••••:iiii6::::::4110A 25:•:•••••••:•ft:AVIA::::NOtA.:••••00.§..00k....p•ki.: ...i.r1.:..,.................,... : ... :.., :,..... „ ,;.,......th6,,,,:::2,:::ft:.,.... •:••••••::::::::::::::::::•:::::•:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::••••:::::::•:•:::::::::::::::::::::::*.:::::::::::•:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::K::::::::::::::::,:::::::::::?:::Burnett:Avenue,anai:.a..:.PR:P!NW.:5! MT :.:!.!•. ::::•:::7:::•:•:....:•••••••::: . . .:.. •:.:.....:.::.*:'.::::::..'•:.::::::.*:...........: frohl:::.:0-itf.:-.seAbdokii:.a..ii.:::.::Sthlthdrg:.::.:Meng9....;...:: 7.49......::::Kppqsil .:: *.'.:'i. it : :''df6Fti;itiFte§idototi:roc*P§PsYiiiiiiii:,*i*iti. curren Iiiirililill::::.:•if:Mil.iil.i.!::::::iii..:%;'..111.11.:ijili:iiiiilii.ilii.iliilii.,1ii.,:lili.,:ii.111.,:iligiliiIiiii::::::11.:1":1:i..:iri,:::,:i•.:::,:!"::::1..:iii:i..:r0...:...1....,'IM,!ii.,:i..:!r.... ....;.::::.:::„....... ,....,..,%:i,...,......;,..,:.:.:,:.:.:.......:,..:..,.....,.....,.......,...................;...........................:......................................:::::::................,....... , : ::::':...)..:::::::::::::::::::::::6CATION:i0FPROF.?-0SAL:; ;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;:if...iiii;.ii::63a.A.OrM....:AY....9. ::.:::: ::::::.:::::i..i..mii:imii...i.f:ini .:m.: *...0:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::.:.:•:•:•:•:•:. , -.' - . -,IrraNt*.. •--.--- 4 • • * ,-- %.•: ''''''' '.7•"1.44E.06-Frfi..M."V°.117-4-t"1 -triVf. rj.i /'°k--- Alta—.P.—.1 .1111cc.r. </- z/-4 /.- . ..)1i/4 /• /- ,.% .."-‘ • ..- :-'164" -- •- • • -74-,• •;;•7/7, -'•/•:',•.!-X, ./-:/-.."./. .'••' ,;" ..;.11411141 7 ' .:.-.: ....::. '..• ••: .• : --•:. '. ' elk ;..•'/'...''..;:://'/7-4,./ y/P/* O....::(g•/;','• -•/./.illeilte *::• : .:-: ••• •:flpe Ast f.,..."-.. ...,,.'.•'/."4:',.; '0.;;;././,.../....':/,/•',/:•i•;••-,,,,,/,? ... .-.:14&/......- -.• - • . . ...-.. '...;.. ..:.'Aft2 ., . ,)•,AlsiII!7....'.. .. 'I7-:.: / . . <-;':•: ;1r:*• V•21...' ••••g.g•:-/.::::*•4?:(//•::•••414:'• :‘ •:;1:••••0:4111......... ': .:••••• • 4 , . . rn.,0_. ., „i,',.............. ...:•..,. . ... .:,..,,...... ..,,... . . : . . . _ 11 .; ., .... ,,:/ .:-...::/,. 0..:,./.:-' ' - -/..:7. '//....4-,.er.A.......:--... •.... .: :;:- .... ..-.., . :1 J., 2 .4.>r./.--/,,o'/.'•.-...... ..A . :-_---/:p; .:-;',',-/,',/—:--" -• •••'-•- ../ . .4t. - ,/,://../////../../..,-.•-.......-././,.•,..x...,.//,/ . .: .. . -.40 Am t:/..-..›./...;:,,,,......;.././.-.,././../;-...;/,.,./.--../.._ _,./.,../,./...... N ., — w 4. :4"7/7..//'".•'.-7'z'''//////''"": ' /".'''''. ../- -•D'''' '''. .- • \x‘ II •I 14 ',/.>"...*•?7::/.,".... -'7 /.••••/"...• ': /.--''''/..•.-/ '../''' ' ' ' •- • s - : ''..•/'.!..,,i7:', '•e:•//,••• %././. •/,•"..•;••;,/,•'.1'.//:/'•//, ',.. '',.','. .• '.' ' ..,;•."., , :- • .... a ../,; ,:-.:--, ,,..:;/.,'. .y .• %••..:::•.,,,;.--..//,. /://.,,y/ /, ,- • _ . c) - i : ----• -- •-.do viii::- ...;••,,../..x........-/./,-,•-.•••:,,,•,,,;,-,-://,<,/,./. /../ , • .•_: .: .'go ....s./....•.:;.-„,/;:;.':,..:,.,-•„/„..;;;•:,-;,-„.--:-. c://:,,...,;-:,/,,.:-///,'/:;.. .,..iit jf•-,..• :'. -rAgr - . - .. -.- to ,',...,....„•,;/,-,..,;/....-://, /,,/,',/////r.:-;.-'/,;(- --Ili:- hp, •• (re, ,,,..,,,,,......,./,,,,,, ,,, / „• ..... , sokliu, -. ., • „;./..//„•-•,;'//:,.;",/ ///,•,,•.`/..,• •f'.,,... . WY t ,• ;•••••.-/-/z/-,•-...././-,,.• •, ..,,x•-.,,,,o- i• .. • 10'.0 VW '•:%..:•%;.1;. .agjik igiteiy17: - . C Ote4q T2— .." ...'•.; .: 1 ., •.,• •• • 010,A01,1111M111 r, :--41i. '•' Ake) 4 1. 'fIT• / • :: • ,- Aa• ask 1100fti %.-.1 '' 4(0 • -• •• •......4.-4 il, cl '.....,: .. •id Wir Ifirkil r - P.,P / • 11," 1' '.H W.I.RAILING gvip-ii Agh -anna-draeak-•-ak-aatill, v -..., ..-.: .vo F.- , loosip ,u), iirsp,4707 ,7 , / / „r=MALI( • /. • . . . , . . .. . . . •• : .. 1 S. 7 t A 5 ''. ' ...-* - r-,-,. /_ - - - / , • __., __ ________ ___.• ___________, . boasfrpt _ _. - • BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT STAFF F. RT Alexander Six-Plex June 24,1992 Page 2 • The applicant seeks to develop a six unit multi-family residential dwelling complex on a now vacant 9100 square foot parcel. The parcel has a triangular configuration with frontages on Burnett Avenue, South 7th Street, and Smithers Avenue. The project site is zoned R-4, Residence District. The Comprehensive Plan designates the site for High Density Residential development. The site is bounded on the east and south by properties zoned for light industrial uses. To the north and west are properties zoned for high density residential. The complex as proposed would be three stories using a mix of single-floor apartments and townhouse style apartments. Parking for the project would be providing below the living units in a partially submerged garage. The R-4 Residential District requires a 25' front yard setback from Arterial Collector streets and a 20'front yard setback from all other streets. Smithers Avenue is designated as an arterial collector street and Burnett Avenue is designated as a local street on the City of Renton Transportation Divisions maps. City Code 4-722, G-3: The Board of Adjustment shall have authority to grant a variance upon making a determination, in writing,that the conditions specified below have been found to exist: 1. That the applicant suffers undue hardship and the variance is necessary because of special circumstances applicable to subject property, including size, shape, topography, location or surroundings of the subject property, and the strict application of the Zoning Code is found to deprive subject property owner of rights and privileges enjoyed by other property owners in the vicinity and under identical zone classification: The applicant is proposing to develop an existing 9,100 sf lot that is zoned for the proposed development. The property is unique in that it has three frontages on three different streets which, in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance, would require the applicant to provide a 20 to 25 foot front yard setback from each of the three streets. Due to the small size of this lot, this would leave an area that would be impossible for the applicant to develop as a high density residential development. The applicant is requesting to use South Seventh Street frontage as the "front yard" and obtain variance for the front yard setback on Smithers and Burnett Avenues. Staff feels this is a reasonable request due to the undue hardship caused by the size, shape and dimensions of the subject property. 2. That the granting of the variance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in the vicinity and zone in which subject property is situated: It appears that there would be no deterious effects on the public welfare from such • setback revisions. The project has been designed as proposed in order to provide access to the site,while limiting impacts (e.g. aesthetic, transportation) to adjacent properties. In addition, development of this abandoned site is likely to improve the appearance of the site, to provide housing opportunities in the City center, and preserve property values in this area. boasfrpt BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT STAFF F RT Alexander Six-Plex June 24,1992 Page 3 3. That approval shall not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitation upon uses of other properties in the vicinity and zone in which the subject property is situated: Granting of the variance would not be a granting of a special privilege. Whenever the size, dimensions, or shape of a parcel places unique, not self-imposed, hardships on the development,the City has consistently worked with the applicants to design a project that meets the intent of the Municipal Code. 4. That the approval as determined by the Board of Adjustment is a minimum variance that will accomplish the desired purpose: Staff concurs with the applicant that the 10 foot variance from the 25 foot setback on Burnett Avenue and the 8 foot variance from the required 20 foot setback on Smithers Avenue appear to be the minimum required to construct the proposed structure in a manner that will be aesthetically pleasing and functional as a residential structure, in that if the applicant was required to construct the building adhering to the required setback either the living units would not be functional (e.g. substandard room sizes) or hallways and stairs would be constricted. .................................................................................................................................................................................................. .................................................................................................................................................................................................. .................................................................................................................................................................................................. .................................................................................................................................................................................................. .................................................................................................................................................................................................. Staff recommends that the Board of Adjustment support the requested 10 foot variance on Burnett Avenue and 8 foot variance on Smithers Avenue for the subject property with the following conditions: 1. That the applicant acknowledge that these variances, if granted, are the total variance for this site and shall agree not to apply for additional variances based upon hardship on this site for the life of these improvements. 2. The maximum infringement into the 20 foot front yard setback on Smithers Avenue shall be eight (8) feet and the maximum infringement into the 25 foot front yard setback required on Burnett Avenue shall be ten (10)feet. Note to the Applicant A. No infringement into the rear yard setback or variance to the height limitation is granted through this variance. boasfrpt 0 0 El 0 , 0 El 11 Q . d E , 12-4L� 0. 0 'R-4 r II R-3 R-3 D � , t2-3 ❑ IIIa IIR_-4 ❑ [❑ ❑ R.-4- Q II ) I=• �;,— El s ro-n-f sT ❑1 Ci . ❑ ❑ , sF D w met.. ....9 ILI i� 13- 1 it - a > ���T�� ¢ � )C -v _ porn.r Auz-f 2 tiT 0 Q ❑,R-4- ❑ 0 J� 6, R-4 =I ❑ r K-4E sF L- I 'f1Zl-7 t F 0 j ❑ W sF & : as I ( I ( (n 33 LITHO. 1 ❑ n ISFI %�� s JITit sT sw.c.A-r+ `,-1+ Av s . R.gh4ro4PAS t ❑ 5HP( VS vcTn-r � pr pz...& T tumoty) L- 1 1-1 Ne- co. 7 . 1=p i 1 L- I 1 II 1-1 - 1 1 1 Q� G- 1 I 1. 1 -I I I • 0, j I scAL - I": Zoos-o' -1 1 ki l G NBOIZHc :o DF_`rAI I- o-I i 4033 BIBRN T7' AV 5 . - g.C.IQTaN WA JULY 20 I9°10 ,) ,v, CITY` OF RENTON .a, ` �' Planning/Building/Public Works Department Earl Clymer, Mayor Lynn Guttmann,Administrator June 12, 1992 Mr. Edward Gonzalez 11015 - 142nd Ave SE Renton, WA 98056 SUBJECT: Alexander Six-Plex ECF;SA;V-150-90 Dear Mr. Gonzalez: The date of Wednesday, June 24, 1992, at 7:00 p.m., has been set for a variance public hearing to review the above-referenced matter. The hearing, before the City of Renton's Board of Adjustment will be held in the Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall, Renton, Washington. The applicant or representativels) of the applicant is required to be present at the public hearing. Interested parties are invited to attend. If you have any questions, please call 235-2550. Sincerely, (2)44t. Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator DKE/kac cc: Sylvia Alexander Scott Swinhart Steve Polich • 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION ' Karen Tucker ,being first duly sworn on oath states that he/she is the Chief Clerk of the VALLEY DAILY NEWS 600 S. Washington Kent, WA. 98032 Daily newspapers published six (6) times a week. That said newspaper is a legal newspaper and is now and has been for more than six months prior to the date of publication referred to, printed and published in the English language continually as a daily newspaper in Kent, King County, Washington. The Valley Daily News has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the Superior Court=of the • State of Washington for King County. The notice in the exact form attached, was published in the Valley Daily News (and not in supplement form) which was regularly distrib- - ,. -'uted to the subscribers during the below stated period. The annexed notice a Notice of Public Hearing was published on 6-1 2-92 'city',QF';RENTON �, BOARD OF--ADJUSTMENT. The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING 49 7 5 g g g A public hearing will be held by the Ren- the sum of S ton Board of Adjustment at its regular busi- ness meeting in the Council Chambers, on the Second Floor of city Hall, Renton, '-1 /l 1111 Washington,on June 24, 1992,at 7:00 p.m. to consider the following: 1 2•t h ' June 9 2 ALEXANDER PLACE SIX-PLEX . .Subscribed and sworn before me this , day of 19 ECF;SA,V-150-90 Applicant seeks a variance to Section .1' /iv:- 4-31-8B.C:4a of the Renton Municipal Code. This would allow a 10 ft encroachment into the 25 ft front yard on Burnett Avenue and a 10 ft encroachment into the 20 ft front yard Not ry Public for the State of Washington on Smither's Avenue. This is an irregular residing at Kent shaped lot with three'front'yards.The pro- King County, Washington ject is located at 633 Burnett Avenue South. WIEHOFF VARIANCE VDN/ 83 Revised 11/91 _ -.-- — - - LUA-92-083-V • _ ___ • Applicant is requesting a variance from Section 4-31-5C.4.B of the Renton Munici- pal Code.This would allow a 5 ft encroach- ment into the 25 ft rear yard setback required in the R-1 zone. The project is • located at 2228 NE 12th St. GLADSTONE VARIANCE LUA-92-077-V The applicant is requesting a variance to Section 431-5.C.4.of the Renton Municipal Code. This would allow a 12 ft encroach- ' ment into the 25 ft front yard setback required in. the R-1 zone. The project is located at 556 Stevens NW. Any and all persons interested in or objecting to said petition are invited to be present at the Board of Adjustment meeting on June 24, 19992,to voice their protest or I objections to-same. • Publishe n the Valley Daily,News June • 12, 1992 7615 _ i>`C:..T:Y._::O :: ;;.:; ... ZT .O �rxx z. . o ?>Ar:r- DAVIT : S_.:,.. 1ST . .IT:.. F. S Cam' . •::: .. ER. . c�...B On the PD day of 19 cll., I . o- L deposited in the mails tie United States a sealed envelope containing Z F.`O.h rook - documents . This information was .sent to: . Name Rerresenti nct • 4�.tra GO v i o e,S . S1 Ivli \eko v e ' 1 • • i- ' 5 WIhk CLA • • . -zteV{ \bllc.-h • . • - • • (Signature o f Sender) tC Se . J Sub rib ed and gd w o me this e�Ge-W day ofIhA,7____:_, 4..4. oo i o` m 'Al' r; 7D ® Not •P b c in and for the. r'''a�v St t o ashington residing • `mac•°� of8, igo C7 e at , 4� • 's o® therein_. • ``'4.o1 ASt-I (4 p,40 • •::Pro:`e'ct: m =P` o:•ems': mbe ::: :> ADMINISTRATIVE SITE PLAN REVIEW CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND DECISION MAY 20, 1992 APPLICATION NO.: ECF; SA 150-90 APPLICANT: Ed.Gonzales/Sylvia Alexander PROJECT NAME: Alexander Six-Plex LOCATION: 633 Burnett Avenue South SUMMARY OF REQUEST: The applicant is seeking site plan approval for a six-unit multi- family residential complex. An application has also been submitted for variances from setback requirements for the Burnett Avenue frontage and the Smithers Avenue frontage; this application will be considered by the Board of Adjustment following SPRC review of the proposed development. COMMITTEE REVIEW: Review was conducted after receiving written comment from all divisions of the Planning/Building/Public Works Department, and the Fire, Police, and Parks Departments. The following exhibits were entered into the record: Exhibit No. 1: Yellow file containing application, proof of posting and publication and other documentation pertinent to this request. Exhibit No. 2: Site plan (received March 1992) Exhibit No. 3: Landscape plan (received March 1992) Exhibit No. 4: Building elevation plans (received March 1992). FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND DECISION Having reviewed the written record in the matter, the City now makes and enters the following: Findings 1. The applicant, Ed Gonzales, has requested site plan approval to allow a six unit multi-family residential complex on a now vacant 9,100 square foot parcel. The parcel has a triangular configuration; there are frontages on Burnett Avenue, South Seventh Street, and Smithers Avenue. The site is bounded on the east (Burnett Avenue) and south (SW 7th Street) by properties zoned for light industrial use. Burnett Linear Park is also located directly adjacent to the site. To the north and the west are parcels zoned for high density multi-family use (R-4). stpinrpt ADMINISTRATIVE SITE PLAN RE'vit=vv ECF;SA;V-150-90 MAY 20, 1992 PAGE 2 The proposed development is a three-level multi-family residential complex (approximately 2730 square feet), to be located over a subterranean parking garage (at a total height of approximately 35 feet). Exterior materials are proposed to be wood, stucco and brick. Staff note that, while the application was initially submitted in 1990, application materials were not completed until March, 1992, due to technical challenges posed and financing constraints experienced by the applicant. 2. The applicant's file containing the application, the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) documentation, the comments from various City departments, the public notices requesting citizen comment, and other pertinent documents was entered as Exhibit No. 1. 3. Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and SEPA (RCW 43.21 C, 1971 as amended), a Determination of Non-Significance - Mitigated was issued for the subject proposal on April 15, 1992, with conditions (see attached Mitigation Measures). 4. Plans for the proposal have been reviewed by all City departments affected by the impact of this proposal. 5. The subject site is part of the City's 1901 incorporation and was zoned R-4 under Ordinance No. 1778. - 6. The applicant's site plan complies with the requirements for information for site plan review. Review of the application was conducted based upon Section 4-31-33(D)(1) of the Zoning Ordinance (Site Plan Review) together with all other relevant information, as follows: a. Conformance with the Comprehensive Plan, its elements and policies; The site is designated for high-density multi-family use on the Current Comprehensive Land Use Plan; the proposed development is consistent with that designation. Also, the proposed complex is consistent with Comprehensive Plan Goals, Objectives and Policies for Residential Uses and with Urban Design Elements. For example, based upon the fact that the residential complex will be located on a now vacant parcel of land, staff view the project as one which would serve to assist in the creation of a sound viable neighborhood, as recommended in Residential Goal (IV.A). Similarly, the project achieves Residential Policy V.C.S., in that it provides a buffer between single-family uses, lower-density multi-family uses, and non- residential developments. The project is consistent with Urban Design Policy III.A., in that it is slated to be located in an existing urban area, where improvements exist to serve the residents. It is also consistent with Urban Design Policy III.C.1., as the proposed landscaping is planned to enhance the primary design and to serve as a buffer between this residential development and surrounding uses (III.C.3-7). b. Conformance with existing land use regulations; (i) Zoning Ordinance: The subject site is zoned R-4, High Density Multi-Family Use, which allows a maximum density of 35 residential units per acre (or stpinrpt ADMINISTRATIVE SITE PLAN RE-?Ai 'l ECF;SA;V-150-90 MAY 20, 1992 PAGE 3 seven units on the .20 acre subject property). The proposed project includes six units (30 units per acre). The planned residential units, with parking, and open space/landscaped area is generally consistent with both density and development standards established for the R-4 zone and criteria established in the Site Plan Review Ordinance. Similarly, the project, as designed by the developer (and/or as recommended by staff), is considered to comply with the City's Parking and Loading Ordinance standards, and with Landscaping Ordinance standards. (ii) Variance Ordinance: Because the site is triangular in configuration, and has frontages on each of the three abutting roadways, three front yard setbacks (twenty feet minimum) and one side yard setback would be customarily required. The applicant is seeking relief from set back requirements through applications for variances. These proposed variances appear to achieve the criteria of the Variance Ordinance. For example, a unique hardship exists, based upon the size, dimensions and shape of this parcel; enforcement of this setback regulation is likely to preclude reasonable development of the site. There is also precedent for such variances.. It appears that there would be no deleterious effects on public welfare from such set back revisions; in fact, the City has suggested this specific design in order to most effectively provide use of/access to the site, while limiting impacts (e.g. aesthetic, transportation) to adjacent properties. In addition, development of this abandoned site is likely to improve the appearance of the site, to provide housing opportunities in the downtown area and conserve property values in this district. More specifically, in order to address setback requirements, the applicant is proposing that the South Seventh Street frontage be considered the "front" boundary of the site, and that the main entrance be located along this roadway. Standard 25 foot setbacks would be provided along this frontage. Similarly, the set back requirements (12 feet) would be achieved for the northern boundary of the property. The applicant is seeking variances for relief from setback requirements to Burnett Avenue (a 15 foot setback is proposed rather than the customarily required 25 feet) and to Smithers Avenue (a 12 foot setback is proposed here rather than the customarily required 20 feet). Staff supports the specifically proposed variance from set back requirements on Smithers Avenue, based upon the fact that: (a) the proposed set back allows. adequate separation of the development from adjacent uses (Smithers Avenue roadway and single-family residences which are on the west side of Smithers Avenue) by elevation of the dwelling units and by a landscape buffer; and (b) there is no entrance to the project along that roadway, so that there is no concern for safe vehicular travel to/from the site. Staff also considers the proposed setback along Burnett Avenue to be acceptable, as: (a) the development is separated from nearby light industrial uses' by Burnett Avenue Linear Park; and (b) landscaping and,screening of the site (as proposed by the applicant and/or recommended by staff) will be designed to achieve a sense of separation between the development and adjacent uses. stpinrpt ADMINISTRATIVE SITE PLAN REv'icvd ECF;SA;V-150-90 MAY 20, 1992 PAGE 4 c. Mitigation of impact to surrounding properties and uses; The proposed residential use is considered to be quite compatible with, although dissimilar from current surrounding development. The planned structure provides an excellent model for an attractive, durable multi-family complex, located on a small lot. For example, the wood/brick/stucco exteriors, with gabled roofs provide an attractive appearance. Elevation of living units, landscaping and setbacks on the subject property proposed by the proponent, and additional amenities recommended by staff in conjunction with land use review (e.g., subterranean, screened of the parking facilities) provide good definition for this development. These characteristics, together with existing buffer areas, provide appropriate separation from surrounding uses. Specifically, there is light industrial development to the south of the site, but this development is separated from the site by South Seventh Street, which is a collector arterial. Development amenities, such as setbacks, stepped elevations and landscaping, also serve to separate the residences from Seventh Street itself. Light industrial development to the east is separated from the site by the Burnett Avenue Linear Park: Older single-family residential developments, which exist to the west of the site are separated from the subject property by Smithers Avenue; an alley way separates the site from older single- family homes to the north. d. Mitigation of impacts of the proposed site plan to the site; The proposed development is considered to be an appropriate use for the site. It is designed and sited in a manner which provides an excellent paradigm for residential development at a transitional location. For example, the intended three-level residential complex is planned to be constructed to include attractive, durable exterior materials (wood, stucco and brick). Parking will be located beneath the living units. The project has been designed to be set back on the site, and developed in a vertical fashion to allow reasonable use of the small, triangular site and to minimize off-site impacts. There will be substantial landscaping introduced around the building and at site boundaries. Landscaped trellises will provide a visual screen for the parking facilities and will form a safety barrier as well against the open, subterranean garage. e. Conservation of area-wide property values; The proposed project is considered to be a positive addition to the local community as it will introduce an appropriate use on an "infill" property which is vacant and unimproved. It will also provide necessary housing units in the central area of the City. While, the proposed six residential units will not make an appreciable difference in the amount of housing stock, it will increase housing options in this area and will not result in any undue burden upon the City. f.' Safety and efficiency of vehicle and pedestrian circulation; Based upon the proposed six unit development, 42 ADWVTE are expected to be generated. This trip volume/rate is not anticipated to result in significant impacts to the site or to neighboring properties. stpinrpt ADMINISTRATIVE SITE PLAN REvri ECF;SA;V-150-90 MAY 20, 1992 , PAGE 5 At the time of building permit review, recommendations will be made for specifications for improvements needed to comply with Code requirements to ensure safety and efficiency of vehicular and pedestrian travel routes. These improvements will include, but may not be limited to: access points, sidewalks, and lighting standards. For example, the entry drive on Burnett Avenue must be relocated so that it is a minimum of 50 feet north of South 7th Street. Along South 7th street, a nine foot wide dedication of property (or easements) must be provided, in order to accommodate a five foot wide sidewalk, lighting and a four foot wide planter strip. Sidewalks must be replaced on Smithers Avenue. Some improvements to curb radii and to lighting will be required on Burnett Avenue as well. Site boundary landscaping should be designed so that the height of planting materials is consistent with AASHTO standards, to allow clear field of vision for vehicles and pedestrians. g. Provision of adequate light and air; The development is generally designed so that units are oriented toward natural light sources. Air circulation is facilitated by the provision of the maximum feasible open space adjacent to living units. The structure is located at the interior of the site, so that impacts to surrounding developments are minimized. Additionally, note is made of the separation of this site from other developments by rights-of-way (e.g. Smithers Avenue, Burnett Avenue, S.W. 7th Street). The proposed six-plex is adjacent to one single-family home, located to the north of the site; separation from this residence is achieved by set backs required under the Zoning Ordinance; based upon this set back, .no significant reduction of light or air circulation is anticipated. h. Mitigation of noise, odors, and other harmful or unhealthy conditions; (i) Construction: Standard construction-related impacts (e.g., noise, dust, debris, traffic) are anticipated in conjunction with the proposed development. Staff anticipate that the construction mitigation plan required by ERC, will address impacts likely to occur in conjunction with site preparation and installation of improvements. (ii) Operation: The proposed development is not anticipated to generate significant levels of sound, light or glare. That noise which is produced would be likely to occur from those activities normally associated with a residential development. Light and glare, too, would be that associated with vehicular travel to/from and use of this residential complex. Light/glare impacts which, do occur should be mitigated by elevation of the living - units above surrounding single-family homes and by screening (proposed by the applicant and/or recommended by the staff) of site boundaries with landscaping and fencing. Similarly, noise impacts should be addressed by building elevations. No undue burden is anticipated upon ' neighboring properties. stpinrpt ADMINISTRATIVE SITE PLAN REVIEW ECF;SA;V-150-90 MAY 20, 1992 PAGE 6 Some noise and light/glare impacts are expected to the site from vehicular/pedestrian travel on adjacent roadways (Burnett Avenue, Smithers Avenue, South Seventh Street). Similarly, light/glare impacts are expected to neighboring roadways from cars " entering onto those rights-of-way. Identified impacts can be mitigated, in part, by design of the access points and parking areas, screening, landscaping and Code-mandated insulation systems for this development. Availability of public services and facilities to accommodate the proposed use; and Public services/utilities are generally available to serve the site as they exist, or improvements can be made to ensure sufficient resources to accommodate the Alexander Six-Plex without undue burden to the community, as illustrated below: (i) Fire/Police: Fire Prevention staff report that adequate emergency service resources are available to serve the site, with standard improvements, such as hydrants, accesses, and sprinklers (in the living units and in the parking garage). Emergency vehicles can travel to the site within the preferred five minute maximum travel time, however, the applicant will be called upon to participate in the now-approved Fire Benefit Zone, which will require contributions for all new development to mitigate community-wide fire service impacts. The fee will be $2,328.00 ($388.00 per unit). (ii) Storm Water Drainage: Storm drainage management plans will be required to be designed (in compliance with the Surface and Storm Water Management Ordinance) to address the fact that the site is located in an area in which the water table is located within six to twelve feet of ground level elevation. Of particular concern is storm water management for the proposed subterranean garage; special water control mechanisms will be required for the subterranean parking area to ensure that flooding does not occur and that contaminants from automobiles in the parking area are properly drained -- e.g., storm water and water table overflow to be directed into the storm drainage system and sprinkler water into the sanitary sewer. (iii) Utilities: Storm water lines are available to the site from lines variously located in Burnett Avenue and/or South 7th Street. Other improvements will need to be installed as included in the Advisory Notes issued in conjunction with the ERC determination. For example, the four inch water line along property frontage on Smithers Avenue will need to be upsized to eight inches. The six inch sewer line along Smithers Avenue will need to be upsized to eight inches to connect with the first downstream manhole (north of site). -A Special Utilities Connection Charge of $4,890.00 is estimated. (iv) Schools: The proposed six-unit residential complex is anticipated to have approximately eleven residents, including three school-aged children. Schools located nearest to the site include Talbot Hills and Henry Ford Elementary Schools, Renton Junior High and Renton High School. No undue burden is anticipated upon school facilities in conjunction with this development. stpinrpt ADMINISTRATIVE SITE PLAN REVIEW ECF;SA;V-150-90 MAY 20, 1992 PAGE 7 (v) Recreation: Based upon the small size of the project site, together with its unusual configuration, there is limited space for on-site recreation facilities. These facilities will not be required since Burnett Linear Park, which has active/passive facilities for children and adults, is immediately adjacent to this development. However, the applicant has been called upon to support regional public recreation facilities through a contribution of $180.00 per unit ($1080.00) toward improvements of facilities in the Central Renton area. j. Prevention of neighborhood deterioration and blight. Staff consider that the proposed project will serve to prevent neighborhood deterioration and blight by bringing an attractive, durable development on a site which is now undeveloped and unimproved. Decision The site plan for The Alexander Six-Plex, File No. SA 150-90 is subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant shall comply with all conditions established in conjunction with the Environmental Review Committee's Determination of Non-Significance, issued on April 15, 1992. 2. The applicant shall provide a landscaping management plan, according to approved maintenance standards, to be valid for the life of the project, and a renewable landscaping maintenance surety device equivalent to ten percent of the value of the plantings, to be valid for a period of three years following the final replacement of vegetation. The management plan and surety device shall be approved by the Development Services Division, and the surety device shall be provided, prior to the issuance of site preparation/building permits for this project. For the purpose of these decisions, the terms "should" and "shall" are to be considered mandatory and the term "may" is considered discretionary. Notes to Applicant: An applicant complying with these provisions and willing to hold the City harmless for any expense or damages incurred for work begun prior to the exhaustion of the 14-day:appeal,period and/or for work which may consequently be stopped by an appeal or work required to be altered or returned to its preconstruction state, may begin construction activities with the issuance of the proper permits. ORDERED this 22nd day of May, 1992, on behalf of the City of Renton Site Plan Approval . Committee DA, Donald K. Erickson, AICP Secretary stpinrpt • i, ADMINISTRATIVE SITE PLAN REVIEW ECF;SA;V-150-90 MAY 20, 1992 PAGE 8 TRANSMITTED this 22nd day of May, 1992 to the parties of record: Ed Gonzales Sylvia Alexander Steve Polich, Tek-Electric Control TRANSMITTED this 22nd day of May, 1992, to the following: Mayor Earl Clymer Lynn Guttmann, Planning/Building/Public Works Administrator Jim Hanson, Development Services Manager Ronald Nelson, Building Official Councilman Richard M. Stredicke Members, Renton Planning Commission Gary Gotti, Fire Marshal Arneta Henninger, Public Works Division Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Valley Daily News REQUESTS FOR RECONSIDERATION must be filed in writing on or before June 5, 1992. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Site Plan Review Committee is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior meeting, may make a written request to the Zoning Administrator for review by the Site Plan Committee within fourteen (14) days of the decision. This request shall set forth the specific errors relied upon by such appellant, and the Committee may, after review of the record, take further action as it deems proper. If an appeal is made to the Hearing Examiner, requests for reconsideration will be forwarded to that office for consideration at the same time as the appeal. AN APPEAL TO THE HEARING EXAMINER is governed by Title IV, Section 4-8(B)(1), which requires that such appeals be filed directly with the Hearing.Examiner. Appeals must be made in writing before 5 p.m. on June 5, 1992, accompanied by a $75.00 fee and other specific requirements. THE APPEARANCE OF FAIRNESS DOCTRINE provides that no ex. parte (private one-on-one) communications may occur concerning land use decision. The Doctrine applies not only to the initial committee decision, but to all Requests for Reconsideration as well as Appeals to the Hearing Examiner. All communications after the decision date must be made in writing through the Zoning Administrator. All communications are public record and this permits all interested parties to know the contents of the communication and would allow them to openly rebut the evidence in writing. Any violation of this doctrine could result in the invalidation of the request by the Court. stpinrpt Washington State District 1 Department of Transportation 15325 Southeast 30th Place Duane Berentson Bellevue,WA 98007-6538 Secretary of Transportation (206)562-4000 PLANNING DIVISION CITY O• DATE: April 28, 1992 TO: Mr. Don Erickson City of Renton, Development & PlampAskiMnit0 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 Subject: SR 900 M.P. 10.33 CS 1712 Mitigated Determination of Non-Significance Alexander Six-Plex File No. ECF;SA;V-150-90 ot,-A41(..UL FROM: Gerald R. Mahl m, Acting Utilities/Developer Services Engineer . Washington State Department of Transportation. District 1 15325 Southeast 30th Place, MS 113 Bellevue, WA 98007-6597 Thank you for giving us the opportunity to review this document. Our response is checked below: X We have reviewed the subject document and have no comments. /The project is remote and will have no significant impact on the state highway system. We have already submitted comments on this project. Our comments are included in our letter dated from to . We have no further comments on this project. The State recommends that a traffic study be prepared to analyze the state intersections that are impacted by ten or more of the project's generated peak hour trips and also determine what mitigation measures, if any, would be required. Intersections that should be analyzed include, but are not limited to, the following: 1. 2. Please contact Don Hurter at 562-4274, or Vickie Erickson at 562-4297, of my Developer Services section if you have any questions. VEE:ct 2ct/vesr900 T :.•.:::��tZENT::•:P.�TIN �FG=:�QV::1S:i0 • -�:•:::::r. ��:.V,1`LT..:Q.F..: S.c�•RV�'�::::BY::.2_.�' f .:.::...................:.:.::....----..... On the daV of deposited in the mails df the United States a sealed envelope containing documents. This information was .sent to : Name • Representing • :I- Cc 'EL*" • toy ' Paul Reitenbach, Chief, Community Planning .- • Gregory M. Bush, Metro " . _ Department of Wildlife ( • • • Larry Ratte, Department of Fisheries Juries Lutz, Department of Trnsportation, JaylLaughlin, City of Seattle • \__ Duwamish Tribal Office Rod Malcom, 'Fisheries, Muckleshoot Indian Tribe i - • b _ _- • D.L. Lensegrav, Puget Power f (Signature of Sender) • . • Subscribed and sworn to me this day of 19 Notary -Public in and far the • State of Washington residing . at therein.• • • • r mb CITY OF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works Department Earl Clymer, Mayor Lynn Guttmann,Administrator April 24, 1992 • Washington State Department of Ecology - Environmental Review Section PO Box 47703 Olympia, WA 98504-7703 • SUBJECT: Environmental Determinations Transmitted herewith is a copy of the Environmental Determination and Environmental Checklist for the following project reviewed by the Environmental Review Committee on April 15, 1 992: DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED ALEXANDER SIX-PLEX ECF;SA;V-150-90 The applicant is seeking: (1) administrative site plan approval for a six-unit multi-family residential complex; (2) a variance from setback requirements for the Burnett Avenue frontage and the • Smithers Avenue frontage (via the Board of Adjustment). The project is located at 633 Burnett Avenue South. The 15 day comment period and the 14 day appeal period for this project will run concurrently and will end on May 12, 1992. Following the end of the comment/appeal period, the City will finalize its Determination unless comments received require a reevaluation. To appeal this Declaration, you must file your appeal document with the hearing examiner within fourteen (14) days of the date the Declaration of Non-significance is final or the Declaration of Significance has been published in the official city newspaper. See City Code Section 4-6-23, RCW 43.21C.075 and WAC 197-11-680 for further details. There shall be only one appeal of a Declaration of Non-Significance or Declaration of Significance, and if an appeal has already been filed, your appeal may be joined with the prior appeal for hearing or may be dismissed if the other appeal has already been heard. If you have questions, please call Lenora Blauman or me at 235-2550. For the Environmental Review Committee, Donald K. Erickson, AICP Secretary _ cc: Paul Reitenbach, Chief, Community Planning Gregory M. Bush, Metro Department of Wildlife Larry Ratte, Department of Fisheries James Lutz, Department of Transportation Jay Laughlin, City of Seattle Duwamish Tribal Office Rod Malcom, Fisheries, Muckleshoot Indian Tribe D.L. Lensegrav, Puget Power 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 t$lar CIT" OF RENTON "ll F' Planning/Building/Public Works Department Earl Clymer, Mayor Lynn Guttmann,Administrator April 24, 1992 Mr. Edward Gonzales 11015 - 142nd Ave SE Renton, WA 98056. SUBJECT: Alexander Six-Plex ECF;SA;V-150-90 Dear Mr. Gonzales: This letter is written on behalf of the Environmental Review Committee and is to inform you that they have completed their review of the environmental impacts of the above-referenced project. The Committee, on April 15, 1992, decided that your project may be issued a threshold Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated with the following conditions: See enclosed Mitigation Measures document. Because the Environmental Review Committee imposed specific mitigation measures rather than issue a Determination of Significance, there is a required 15 day comment period during which comments are solicited from various agencies, jurisdictions or individuals (including the applicant) who may have an interest in the Committee's decision. The required 14 day appeal period will run concurrently with the comment period. WAC 197-1 1-660 states that the responsibility for implementation measures may be imposed upon an applicant only to the extent attributable to the identified adverse impacts of the imposed action. Since an environmental impact statement has not been prepared for this project, any mitigation measure established by the ERC not directly attributable to an identified adverse impact is deemed to be voluntarily accepted by the applicant. The comment/appeal will end May 12, 1992. Following the end of the comment/appeal period, the City will finalize its Determination, unless comments received require a reevaluation. In addition, by the end of the comment/appeal period, we should be able to establish a tentative date for completion of administrative site plan review and a tentative public hearing date before the Board of Adjustment. Staff urges you to contact the various City representatives, as appropriate, (e.g., the Public Works Division) as soon as possible, to obtain more information concerning specific mitigation elements,recommended for this project, if you have specific questions. This information will assist you in planning for implementation of your project and will enable you to exercise your appeal rights more fully, if you choose to do so. To appeal this Declaration, you must file your appeal document with the hearing examiner within fourteen (14) days of the date the Declaration of Non-significance is final or the Declaration of Significance has been published in the official city newspaper. See City Code Section 4-6-23, RCW 43.21C.075 and, WAC 197-11-680 for further details. There shall be only one appeal of a Declaration of Non-Significance or Declaration of Significance, and if an appeal has already been filed, your appeal may be joined with the prior appeal for hearing or may be dismissed if the other appeal has already been heard. • If you have any questions or desire clarification of the above, please call Lenora Blauman or me at 235-2550. Fort vironmenta a .iew Committee, Donald K. Erickson, AICP Secretary DKE/kac enclosure: Mitigation Measures cc: Sylvia Alexander Scott Swinhart 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) APPLICATION NO(S): ECF;SA;V-150-90 APPLICANT: E. M. Gonzales PROJECT NAME: Alexander Six-Plex DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is seeking: (1) administrative site plan approval for a six-unit multi-family residential complex; (2) a variance from setback requirements for the Burnett Avenue frontage and the Smithers Avenue frontage (via the Board of Adjustment). LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 633 Burnett Avenue South LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Development Planning Section The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). Conditions were imposed as mitigation measures by the Environmental Review Committee under their authority of Section 4-6-6 Renton Municipal Code (see attached sheet). These conditions are necessary to mitigate environmental impacts identified during the environmental review process. This Determination of Non-Significance - Mitigated (DNS-M) is issued under WAC 197-11-340(2). Because mitigation measures have been imposed, the lead agency will not act on this proposal for fifteen (15) days from April 27, 1992. Any interested party may submit comments or appeal this decision which must be submitted, in writing, by 5:00 p.m., May 12, 1992, in order to be considered. A fourteen (14) day appeal period will run concurrently. Responsible Official: Environmental Review Committee c/o Don Erickson, Secretary Development Planning Section Department of Planning/Building/Public Works 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 You may appeal this determination in writing to Renton Hearing Examiner no later than 5:00 p.m., May 12, 1992. To appeal this Declaration, you must file your appeal document with the hearing examiner within fourteen (14) days of the date the Declaration of Non-Significance is final or the Declaration of Significance has been published in the official city newspaper. See City Code Section 4-6-23, RCW 43.21 C.075 and WAC 197-11-680 for further details. There shall be only one appeal of a Declaration of Non-Significance or Declaration of Significance, and if an appeal has already been filed, your appeal may be joined with the prior appeal for hearing or may be dismissed if the other appeal has already been heard. You should be prepared to make specific factual objections. Contact City of Renton, Development Services Division to read or ask about the procedures for SEPA appeals. PUBLICATION DATE: April 27, 1992 DATE OF DECISION: April 15, 1992 SIGNATURES: Lynn A. 3044/. t SAG '6DATEP Depart�f nning/Building/Public Works John E. e ey, Administrator ( DATE Community Servi Departme ee e r, ire Chief DATE Re n Fnire Department mitsi¢ DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED MITIGATION MEASURES PROJECT: Alexander Six-Plex APPLICANT: E. M. Gonzales APPLICATION NUMBER: ECF;SA;V-150-90 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is seeking: (1) administrative site plan approval for a six-unit multi-family residential complex; (2) a variance from setback requirements for the Burnett Avenue frontage and the Smithers Avenue frontage (via the Board of Adjustment). LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 633 Burnett Avenue South CONDITIONS: The Environmental Review Committee issued a Determination of Non- Significance - Mitigated with•the following conditions: 1. The applicant shall, in order to mitigate impacts to earth, air, water, noise impacts, and light/glare impacts, provide a construction plan including the following components: a) an erosion control element; b) an element for periodic watering of the site to reduce dust; c) an element for wheel washing of construction vehicles prior to their departure from the site to reduce dust; d) a schedule which confines construction operations to the hours between 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. on weekdays and 8:00 a.m. - 5:00 p.m. on Saturdays; and d) a renewable $2000.00 cash deposit (or other acceptable surety device) to be provided by the applicant to the City for street cleaning. These plans should be provided and fees paid prior to the issuance of building permits; the plans should be in effect for the duration of construction. 2. The applicant shall be encouraged, in order to mitigate regional recreation impacts, to provide a voluntary - contribution of $1080.00 toward improvements to regional recreation facilities in the Central Area of the City. Improvements should be provided or fees contributed prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy. 3. The applicant shall be encouraged, in order to mitigate emergency services impacts, to provide a voluntary contribution of $2820.00 toward the pending Fire Benefit Zone. Fees should be provided prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy. In the event that the Fire Benefit Zone is adopted by City Council prior to the issuance of building permits for the project, the applicant may be called upon to make a fair share contribution to that Zone. At the present time, this contribution is estimated to be $470.00 per unit. ADVISORY NOTES TO THE APPLICANT: The following advisory notes are supplementary to the environmental mitigation measures, and are intended to provide information in conjunction with the environmental determination of non-significance, mitigated. As these Advisory Notes are for information only, they are not subject to appeal under the environmental threshold determination. 1. The applicant will be required to provide Code-mandated improvements, which may include, but not limited to: (a) insulation to limit interior ambient sound levels to 50 dBA (EPA Noise Standards); (b) SUCC (utility connection) fees in the amount of $4,890.00; and (c) life safety improvements (e.g., hydrants, sprinklers to dwelling units and the garage, etc.). 2. At the time of site plan and/or building permit review, recommendations will be made for the specifications for required on-site and off-site improvements (e.g., sidewalks, size of driveway throats, location of lighting standards) to comply with Code requirements. For example, the entry drive on Burnett Avenue will need to MITMEAS - 1 be relocated so that it is a minimum of 50 feet north of South 7th Street. Along South 7th street, a nine foot wide easement (or dedication) will need to be provided, in order to accommodate a five foot wide sidewalk, street lighting and a four foot wide planter strip. Sidewalks shall be replaced on Smithers Avenue. Some improvements to curb radii and to lighting will be required on Burnett Avenue as well. 3. The applicant will need to provide storm drainage management plans designed (in compliance with the Surface and Storm Water Management Ordinance) to address the fact that -the underlying water table is located within six to twelve feet of ground level elevation. At the time of site plan/building permit review, special water control mechanisms (e.g., sump pump, floor drains) will be necessary for the subterranean parking area to direct storm water and water table overflows to the storm water system and sprinkler water to the sanitary sewer to ensure that flooding does not occur and that contaminants from automobiles in the parking area are not introduced into the storm drainage system. 4. The four inch water line along property frontage on Smithers Avenue will need to be upsized to 8". Six inch sewer line along Smithers Avenue will need to be upsized to 8" to first downstream manhole (north of site). 5. At the time of site plan review, staff may establish conditions as necessary to ensure that the project is consistent with criteria in the Site Plan Review Ordinance. For example, in conjunction with site plan review, the applicant will be called upon to provide a landscaping management plan and a landscaping maintenance surety device to protect on-site plantings. • MITMEAS - 2 r „ � • • AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION Shirley Morehead , being first duly sworn on oath states Acct. #51 067 that he/she is the Chief Clerk of the • VALLEY DAILY NEWS NOTICE 9F'iE Daily newspapers published six (6) times a week. That said newspapers are 'DETERMINNVIRONMENTAUA ION' _ ' . ' legal newspapers and are now and have been for more than six months prior ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW to the date of publication referred to, printed and published in the English COMMITTEE RENTON, W TON language continually as daily newspapers in Kent, King County, Washington. The Environmental Review Committee ,{ The Valley Daily News has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of •• (ERC) has issued a Determination of Non- , the Superior Court of the State of Washington for King County. Significance - Mitigated for the following project under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code. The notice in the exact form attached, was published in the Valley Daily ALEXANDER SIX-PLEX News (and not in supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its ECF;SA;V-150-90 period. public The applicant is seeking: (1) adminis- subscribers duringthe below stated The annexed notice a p trative site plan approval for a six-unit notice #VN7 398—City of Renton/ENVIRONMENTAL DETER- multi-family residential complex; (2) a MINATION/ALEXANDER SIX-PLEX-ECF;SA=V-150-90 variance from setback requirements' for the Burnett Avenue frontage (via e Board project April 27 , 1992 is located e at 633 Burnett was published on South. Any interested party may submit written comments, or may appeal the above deter- ; mination within fifteen (15) days before the The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum publication date. Written comments or of$ 69.48 appeals will be accepted ;until 5:00 p.m., , . May 12, 1992. To appeal this Declaration, . you must your appealdocument with the hearing examiner fourteener within (14) days i of the date the Declaration of Non-signifi- cance is final or the Declaration of Signifi- • cance has been published in,the official city Subscribed and sworn before me t ' 2 7 th day of April i9 92 ' , newspaper. See City Code Section 4-6-23, •• RCW 43.21C.075 and WAC 197-11-680 for further details. There shall be only one appeal of a Declaration of Non-Significance or a Declaration of Significance, and if an appeal has already been filed, your appeal may be joined with the prior appeal for Notary Public for the State of Washington ! hearing or may be dismissed if the other residing at Kent appeal has already been heard. Appeals King County, Washington should be specific and shall set forth the g reasons why the particular environmental VDN#87 Revised 8/91 determination should be reversed. Appeals ;shall be filed with the Renton Hearing 1 Examiner, Municipal Building, 200 Mill Ave- nue South, Renton, Washington 98055, 1 • •within the fifteen (15) day comment/appeal period, All appeals must be accompanied by a non-refundable $75.00 filing fee..The mitigation measures imposed by the City of Renton's Environmental Review Committee ' are available at the Development Services Division, Third floor, Municipal Building, I Renton, Washington 98055. Phone: 235:2550. s Published.in the,Valleyi©aily,iNews or April,27;4992. 7398 NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a Determination of Non-Significance - Mitigated for the following project under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code. ALEXANDER SIX-PLEX ECF;SA;V-150-90 The applicant is seeking: (1) administrative site plan approval for a six-unit multi- family residential complex; (2) a variance from setback requirements for the Burnett Avenue frontage and the Smithers Avenue frontage (via the Board of Adjustment). The project is located at 633 Burnett Avenue South. Any interested party may submit written comments, or may appeal the.above determination within fifteen (15) days of the publication date. Written comments or appeals will be accepted until 5:00 p.m., May 12, 1992. To appeal this Declaration, you must file your appeal document with the hearing examiner within fourteen (14) days of the date the Declaration of Non-significance is final or the Declaration of Significance has been published in the official city newspaper. See,City Code Section 4-6-23, RCW 43.21 C.075 and WAC 197-1 1-680 for further details. There shall be only one appeal of a Declaration of Non-Significance or Declaration of Significance, and if an appeal has already been filed, your appeal may be joined with the prior appeal for hearing or may be dismissed if the other appeal has already been heard. Appeals should be specific and shall set forth the reasons why the particular environmental determination should be reversed. Appeals shall be filed with the Renton Hearing Examiner, Municipal Building, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, Washington 98055, within ,the fifteen (15) day comment/appeal period. All appeals must be accompanied by a non-refundable $75.00 filing fee. The mitigation measures imposed by the City of Renton's Environmental Review Committee are available at the Development Services Division, Third Floor, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington 98055. Phone: 235-2550. Publication Date: April 27, 1992 • Account No. 51067 • pubnot I ` T E , • :, .. + , , .„ • , ,, 0, ,. , 1 N� ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION , Posted to Notify Interested Persons of an Environmental Action PROJECT. NAME/NUMBER: ALEXANDER SIX-PLEX I ' ECF;SA;V-150-90 ' PROPOSED ACTION: THE APPLICANT IS SEEKING: (1) ADMINISTRATIVE SITE PLAN APPROVAL FOR A SIX-UNIT MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL COMPLEX; (2);A VARIANCE FROM i SETBACK REQUIREMENTS FOR THE BURNETT AVENUE FRONTAGE' AND THE SMITHERS AVENUE FRONTAGE (VIA THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT). i 1 LOCATION: 633 BURNETT AVENUE SOUTH 1 _ I THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (ERC) HAS DETERMINED THAT I THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. , I 1 AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT WILL NOT BE REQUIRED. , I . THERE IS NO COMMENT PERIOD FOR THIS DETERMINATION. HOWEVER,,AN APPEAL OF THIS DETERMINATION MAY BE FILED WITH THE CITY OF RENTON HEARING EXAMINER BY 5:00 PM, YOU MAY COMMENT ON THIS DETERMINATION UNTIL 5:00 PM, I . THE CITY WILL NOT ACT ON THIS PROPOSAL UNTIL AFTER THIS DATE. I 1 THE ABOVE COMMENT PERIOD FOR THE ABOVE DETERMINATION HAS NOW EXPIRED. APPEALS OF THIS DETERMINATION MAY BE FILED WITH THE CITY OF IRENTON HEARING EXAMINER BY 5:00 PM, . [ giYOU MAY COMMENT ON OR APPEAL THIS DETERMINATION BY 5:00 PM, MAY 12, 1992. �THE COMMENT AND APPEAL PERIODS WILL EXPIRE CONCURRENTLY. 1 . FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION AT 235-2550. 1 , DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE ' : • • WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION • I •.PLEASE:INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION. I I CERTIFICATION:. I , C , HEREBY CERTIFY THAT COPIES OF • DOCUMENT WERE POSTED BY ME IN J� CONSPICUOUS THE ABOVE ,�y� PLACES ON OR NEARBY THE DESCRIBED PROPERTY ON Y -, 7,�) g9nR • ,,,aopuumre`c .� ,mGARE P, • , P ,o • . At V o 1MISSI4% G�1 ATTEST: Subser and sworn to before me, a . • �rJ, o "t0 I: Notary P.ublie, n end for the State of Nash�',gfon 4 ,, �bT40 5A C n residi ' , an the U`7 SIGNED: 3 ` N a day o d�— • lisz. :,4%,I SHING��`� • '`�9^aaeest-- ,I ti`cY „ rA_ 011 NrfO ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ' Posted to Notify Interested Persons of an Environmental Action PROJECT NAME/NUMBER: ALEXANDER SIX-PLEX ECF;SA;V-150-90 PROPOSED ACTION: THE APPLICANT IS SEEKING: (1) ADMINISTRATIVE SITE PLAN APPROVAL FOR A SIX-UNIT MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL COMPLEX; (2) A VARIANCE FROM SETBACK REQUIREMENTS FOR THE BURNETT AVENUE FRONTAGE AND THE SMITHERS AVENUE FRONTAGE (VIA THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT). LOCATION: 633 BURNETT AVENUE SOUTH. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (ERC) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT WILL NOT BE REQUIRED. THERE IS NO COMMENT PERIOD FOR THIS DETERMINATION. HOWEVER, AN APPEAL OF THIS DETERMINATION MAY BE FILED WITH THE CITY OF RENTON HEARING EXAMINER BY 5:00 PM, • YOU MAY COMMENT ON THIS DETERMINATION UNTIL 5:00 PM, THE CITY WILL NOT ACT ON THIS PROPOSAL UNTIL AFTER THIS DATE. THE ABOVE COMMENT PERIOD FOR THE ABOVE DETERMINATION HAS NOW EXPIRED. APPEALS OF THIS DETERMINATION MAY BE FILED WITH THE CITY OF RENTON HEARING EXAMINER BY 5:00 PM, YOU MAY COMMENT ON OR APPEAL THIS DETERMINATION BY 5:100 PM, MAY 12, 1992. THE COMMENT AND APPEAL PERIODS WILL EXPIRE CONCURRENTLY: FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION AT 235-2550. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE. • WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE'IDENTIFICATION. t. - - - ' �::::•: �'.:''.�.., ::',.::::.:'::� ".�::.: ... . : '. .'::.. ..:.:•:''':•.:` •:::'^::L:.:.'::>::...:::::WQR. K.::,.."i{ .:.:.::•'..:. :":>•::.> »...:>.v•.>.:i ` >'{}::v.:v ::i:: . :IPUB I. .. 7; :':: ' ::::': ::: , : v:::::0F P LA�N' .::. IvBU.11 DI ;. itTE ?IN' : W .comm. :..........: (::•;rA.'RTM�V.:: ::. ;: . T LRE1E{.'>:i:::'i:� :::�.:;.:::.::: :::DEP I > N EN::::.:::; ` ; •G OU<A :'::>.'.;:: . . NI�.:::> . ` > :>:<: ::.>'�': :' .>::::::::::>.<.:::.:::::.:::•:;;;<:::::: :< :`<<> :>:°.:.:':<°: <: :: • �� '>:» :: .:''ICI:::.:::::.n l .:::':.,: .>' ><:::<>:''< > :,: >�` <: '> ::4:ii. i. .:::..':::<.:: :::<Pf��J.SCT:,.', •>.:.. ... ::. . :::. .. . Alexander:Srx�Plex';.::.' ... .;.:•:....::.::�.'::�:: . .>::::'.:::::::: ;' :.';:.:.>:,>> :<: .:::;°:SNVIRONMI_NTAL:°`CI I:CKLIS'I'::::::•:`:.>:>.�CF,SAVw:'1.5:4:- : < ::><` . ::>'' ::`.`: `« :::<::::: .::.•:::IDI;SCRIPTION;:01*.:PROPOSAL :' <:::>;.;The':a licant::::is:::seekln `>:administrativs::srte:> lan a :roval'for:>ai:: •" ' sixunit multi=family:resi,dential::coo lex• :(2)<:'a':>vari.ance from`setback:re�urri ments for:the.;:6urnett Avenue::: ..::fronta a and:the:.Smithers Avenue:::frontage;(via ahe'`Board:of<Ad•justme t;: `;:' :`? >><>' .:::_ ' : : ' :::::: I»OCATIO.N::O:F:::PROP.OSAI:;;'' >;.>; .'::633:i.surnett:Ave•n.ue:South::: .... :;: .:. . '•:... .', '... ...:::':' : ;:'.:: :<:• :.: ::.:: ; ISSUIrS:;'.::..::: • . .'': • •Land.:Use;.: •Aesthetics, Earth :Water °,Trans :ortation•::Environment I :': <:>Health; Noise':;Li ht/Glare,>:Air:'Quali' : •P•ublic:Ser:vices.'P.ublic`:Utiiities:::;:::;.: :: :...• :•• ;.:.:: : ::::::::':;::>:<:> < RECOMMENDAT RECOMMENDATIONS : : • . . . . • staff:re...•••end .a l nviro:l me:n.tal F va w.:':Ca•mmitr e issue;a. ....,!.........::..,..::Peterminatiori::of>Nor»'Si•`nifica •nce,::Mrtr ated for the>a ove describetl six::uni.>residential'com'•i x ''i` '"``'' .. •,• .. n,,...:::•::::.;.....' ..... :::.: . �." : :' :'. .' ..;':::>. . ::t:. .:.:.. . :: p:a ,:,wrth the::: • • . .fallowNng::.canditions.,.:::.:.... ercrpt ENVIRQNMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE Si,-,'' REPORT ALEXANDER SIX PLEX APRIL 15; 1992 Page 2 B ..:...... :.ROJ CT...::O:CA.::.: N:..MA.P....: >... . .. .;: .... • •;.:.:;;:..::..:, .::... ::::.... ....:....... ;...; ;:. ..>:> .. I i L� l _ _ ;`' tom a'>4„':ari'�.„��j�•Y�.., J '`.. fit', «. ..� \ - ct '.a — -..,.>.e _ /`•° may ; "`v` r` O ' "C —.--' 1:ra 4 , •g : ''' AN'f-P1'.'J'!4:t.ep.A.,,,,,-. ,,,1,4,, u_. `'5 NW 2nd = Jul fall l i � i to tr. a-1 S 132nd �•• � '� < �` 51� �.1 Ar.a tE goa I iEsil iii al ! .. , R:_ all.--''i rci-,,'„Iri . ..41.'.4.17',,'..,,,'7,:,..,',,;;;;.4....,1:::.::::-.:LT:t.i.,M,::4'..-g,EA ' 'i LI I 3 iii !MI liar, ‘.. - :F512 Zr! � P � n mail `, tilit■ .� • aTip a`- �'. ....4 `i ;°. fl .iiii pia aulittfiqii , ". rit 88 � laws >* t I �, k��A� �. ;�';::. ti Fri: t�kir"a em© 1-4e-1-ci'tJ t gay 1 �,�' r, 'V LI J !" Elite R 0i W' a r©ice ^it e ' t4 ,: Y .n't !''t.".c{ . may^ .. ' 1Y- 91 f i ArEi? *Mr*,.4 7,4,!!*--.„--,iii... ..4c.,,,,Iii, e'.1\ gIDEVVIR.. ..- imat....,-N.,.. 6i O©- �I � kr`: 3. `oy i.'SW h X a ,.!'!,.,IN:�I-� p� .r,. 66. 1111 eV tlair 44 1 ,,,w1,_14,,,,,,,,,,. t,„ 44... ..,41,11,,,,-11,-#V 4 ic. ii No :3.1ritz: II MI= oa�,,,��a";" \ .' a � .� i..1 � x il= ice. : l ��1rer,1! �� ;n �`t o `e- o . P „iqs.- "i,�iy © ,.,,r . t cF a +1�//�lO'�I�I �/ ti o t� s'-7[�r ,„e 1, Cµ'ryt ® j� .1,{��P49)" ll2001 �pe . 9' "�"rfiL i w� + ems,`g0 ®Q1 a a 1'®!a ! lip;` �� LeJ{►!������� /���1/j :xi`s ®. 5� ";.. ti; io> w'u'En9`Q u®a, i`ti o,,gg, �a 1 FA P.� .��®���® ♦`�4924 , ik.)14 -'�'` After ;' #; 3' 1 ®®s g " ®gra 6®�mil 0 El ' 51%1- ��rs�0.���ij. `FPUD<=�` 6.:a?.` mc`�a.,. .� � ®® ®r rim,i I®� ®cm�; ,et9i �� gs��rA���� I-037 87 5 .L":fer. z 3 .r �j, =,�j� a. mg ;<� � �I,�OzIyi/I1 ,' k r aE n 1".-..1� aaii w Er®'®1 ® • w>��4 �B , x'r tc� . : �. h ] 1� Oise au®r'ere,}®-® la I �'—'. • r..� 'PBB.IItOAV,� a 3w"` ,• , srt1 r,A ` +�+� .a +rk,-.,rY:�^;rJAx,F3rs-.rrrs^�-szx r� �`" i., 7. • 1 x:X. .s'r," .. .,.ve.-W"Rr k 'S ft".A'-_ ,f+ .... ��'i i®r .®i� PS :4 '"* • '`"•.l _ 2,7 + 's' nw kj,; m .vam'�'. � I y�r ,n '. :; ., x S•ST , ,dam3. ,t= „..r,s ,j. i : ,.v�,v rack,,,. :> a' "ni avam ,.. per ^„ ..,.- 4e m , its aqua s--�4. S linir y ercrpt ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE S.,.. REPORT ALEXANDER SIX PLEX APRIL 15, 1992 Page 3 Staff recommend that the Environmental Review Committee issue a Determination of Non-Significance, Mitigated, for the above-described six unit residential complex, with the following conditions: Earth/Air/Water/Environmental Health 1. The applicant shall, in order to mitigate impacts to earth, air, water, noise impacts, and light/glare impacts, provide a construction plan including the following components: a) an erosion control elements b) an element for periodic watering of the site to reduce dust; c) an element for wheel washing of construction vehicles prior to their departure from the site to reduce dust; d) a schedule ' which confines construction operations to the hours between 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. on weekdays and 8:00 a.m. - 5:00 p.m. on Saturdays; and d) a renewable $2000.00 cash deposit (or other acceptable surety device) to be provided by the applicant to the City for street cleaning. These plans should be provided and fees paid prior to the issuance of building permits; the plans should be in effect for the duration of construction. . Recreation 2. The applicant shall be encouraged, in order to mitigate regional recreation impacts, to provide a voluntary contribution of $1080.00 toward improvements. to regional recreation facilities in the Central Area of the City. Improvements should be provided or fees contributed prior to_the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy. Public Services 3. The applicant shall be encouraged, in order to mitigate emergency services impacts, to provide a voluntary contribution of $4320.00 toward the pending Fire Benefit Zone. Fees should be provided prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy. In the event that the Fire Benefit Zone is adopted by City Council prior to the issuance of building permits for the project, the applicant may be called upon to make a fair share contribution to that Zone. At the present time, this contribution is estimated to be $470.00 per unit. ADVISORY NOTES: The following advisory notes are supplementary to the environmental mitigation measures, and are intended to provide information in conjunction wit7Athe environmental determination of non-significance, mitigated. As these Advisory Notes are for information only, they are not subject to appeal under the environmental threshold determination. 1. The applicant will be required to provide Code-mandated improvements, which may include, but not limited to: (a) insulation to limit interior ambient sound levels to 50 dBA (EPA Noise Standards); (b) SUCC (utility connection) fees in the amount of $4,890.00; and (c) life safety improvements (e.g., hydrants, sprinklers to dwelling units and the garage, etc.). 2. At the time of site plan and/or building permit review, recommendations will be made for the specifications for required on-site and off-site improvements (e.g., sidewalks, size of driveway throats, location of lighting standards) to comply with Code requirements. For example, the entry drive on Burnett Avenue will need to be relocated so that it is a minimum of 50 feet north of South 7th Street. Along South 7th street, a nine foot wide easement (or dedication) will need to be provided, in order to accommodate a five foot wide sidewalk, street lighting and a four foot wide planter strip. Sidewalks shall be replaced on Smithers Avenue. Some improvements to curb radii and to lighting will be required on Burnett Avenue as well. 3. The applicant will need to provide storm drainage management plans designed (in compliance with the Surface and Storm Water Management Ordinance) to address the fact that the underlying water table is ercrpt ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE E. REPORT ALEXANDER SIX PLEX APRIL 15, 1992 Page 4 located within six to twelve feet of ground level elevation. At the time.of site plan/building permit review, special water control mechanisms (e.g., sump pump, floor drains) will be necessary for the subterranean parking area to direct storm water and water table overflows to the storm water system and sprinkler water to the sanitary sewer to ensure that flooding does not occur and that contaminants from automobiles in the parking area are not introduced into the storm drainage system. 4. Four inch water line along property frontage on Smithers Avenue will need to be upsized to 8". Six inch sewer line along Smithers Avenue will need to be upsized to 8" to first downstream manhole (north of site). The applicant is seeking to develop a six unit multi-family residential complex on a now vacant 9,100 square foot parcel. The parcel has a triangular configuration; there are frontages on Burnett Avenue, South Seventh Street, and Smithers Avenue. The site is bounded on the east (Burnett Avenue) and south (S. W. 7th Street) by properties zoned for light industrial use. Burnett Linear Park is also located directly adjacent to the site. To the north and the west are parcels zoned for high density multi-family use (R-4). The proposed development is a three-level multi-family residential complex (approximately 2730 square feet), to be located over a subterranean parking garage (at a total height of approximately 35 feet). Exterior materials are proposed to be wood, stucco and brick. N IR' NMENTAL<ELEM.EN:T`... . < > ' " •`:` ` 1. Land Use/Housing Impacts: The subject site is zoned R-4, High Density Multi-Family Use, which allows a maximum density of 35 residential units per acre (or seven units on the .20 acre subject property). The proposed project includes six units (30 units per acre). The planned residential units, with parking, and open space/landscaped area is generally consistent with both density and development standards established for the R-4 zone and criteria established in the Site Plan Review Ordinance. Similarly, the project, as designed by the developer (and/or as recommended by staff), is considered to essentially comply with the City's Parking and Loading Ordinance standards, and with Landscaping Ordinance standards. The proposed use is considered to be generally appropriate for the site, and generally compatible with, although dissimilar from surrounding development. For example, there is light industrial development to the south of the site, but this development is separated from the site by South Seventh Street, which is a collector arterial. Development amenities, such as setbacks, stepped elevations and landscaping, also serve to separate the residences from Seventh Street itself. Light industrial development to the east is separated from the site by the Burnett Avenue Linear Park. Older single-family residential developments, which exist to the west of the site are separated from the subject property by Smithers Avenue; an alley way separates the site from older single-family homes to the north. Impacts to/from those single-family homes will be mitigated, in part, by differences in the elevation of living units, landscaping and setbacks on the subject property proposed by the proponent, and additional amenities recommended by staff in conjunction with land use review (e.g., screening of the parking facilities). Because the site is triangular in configuration, and has frontages on each of the three abutting roadways, three front yard setbacks (twenty feet minimum) and one side yard setback would be customarily required. The applicant is seeking relief from set back requirements through applications for variances. These proposed variances appear to achieve the criteria of the Variance ercrpt ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE S'i rr=r REPORT ALEXANDER SIX PLEX APRIL 15, 1992 Page 5 Ordinance. For example, a unique hardship exists, based upon the size, dimensions and shape of this parcel; enforcement of this setback regulation is likely to preclude reasonable development of the site. There is also precedent for such variances. It appears that there would be no deleterious effects on public welfare from such set back revisions; in fact, redevelopment of this abandoned site is likely to improve the appearance of the site, to provide housing opportunities in the downtown area and conserve property values in this district. More specifically, in order to address setback requirements, the applicant is proposing that the South Seventh Street frontage be considered the "front" boundary of the site, and that the main entrance be located along this roadway. Standard 25 foot setbacks would be provided along this frontage. Similarly the set back requirements (12 feet) would be achieved for the northern boundary of the property. The applicant is seeking variances for relief from setback requirements to Burnett Avenue (a 15 foot setback is proposed rather than the customarily required 25 feet) and to Smithers Avenue (a 12 foot setback is proposed here rather than the customarily required 20 feet). Staff supports the specifically proposed variance from set back requirements on Smithers Avenue, based upon the fact that: (a) the proposed set back allows adequate separation of the development from adjacent uses (Smithers Avenue roadway and single-family residences which are on the west side of Smithers Avenue) by elevation of the dwelling units and by a landscape buffer; and (b) there is no entrance to the project along that roadway, so that there is no concern for safe vehicular travel to/from the site. Staff also considers the proposed setback along Burnett Avenue to be acceptable, as: (a) the development is separated from nearby light industrial uses by Burnett Avenue Linear Park; and (b) landscaping and screening of the site (as proposed by the applicant and/or recommended by staff) will be designed to achieve a sense of separation between the development and adjacent uses. The provision'of six residential units will not make an appreciable difference in the amount of housing stock; it will increase housing options in this area and will not result in any undue burden upon the City. Mitigation Measures: None required. Policy Nexus: Not applicable.. 2. Aesthetics Impacts: The proposed three-level residential complex is planned to be constructed to include exterior materials of wood, stucco and brick. Parking will be located beneath the living units, and will be partially submerged. The project has been designed to be set back on the site, and developed in a vertical fashion to allow reasonable use of the small, triangular site and to minimize off-site impacts. There will be substantial landscaping introduced around the building and at site boundaries; site boundary landscaping should be designed so that the height of planting materials is consistent with AASHTO standards, to allow clear field of vision for vehicles and pedestrians. Landscaped trellises will provide a visual screen for the parking facilities and will form a safety barrier as well against the open, subterranean garage. Mitigation Measures: None required in conjunction with environmental review. Policy Nexus: Not applicable. ercrpt ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE REPORT ALEXANDER SIX PLEX APRIL 15, 1992 Page 6 3. Transportation Impacts: Based upon the proposed six unit development, 42 ADWVTE are expected to be generated. This trip volume/rate is not anticipated to result in significant impacts to the site or to neighboring properties. At the time of site plan and/or building permit review, recommendations will be made for the specifications (e.g., sidewalks, size of driveway throats, location of lighting standards) to comply with Code requirements to ensure safety and efficiency of vehicular and pedestrian travel routes. For example, the entry drive on Burnett Avenue must be relocated so that it is a minimum of 50 feet north of South 7th Street. Along South 7th street, a nine foot wide dedication of property (or easements) must be provided, in order to accommodate a five foot wide sidewalk, .lighting and a four foot wide planter strip. Sidewalks must be replaced on Smithers Avenue. Some improvements to curb radii and to lighting will be required on Burnett Avenue as well. Mitigation Measures: None required in conjunction with environmental review. At the time of site plan and/or building permit review, recommendations will be made for the specifications (e.g., sidewalks, size of driveway throats, location of lighting standards) to comply with Code requirements to ensure safety and efficiency of vehicular and pedestrian travel routes. Some improvements to curb radii and to lighting will be required on Burnett Avenue as well. Policy Nexus: Not applicable. 4. Noise, Light and Glare Impacts: Noise, light and glare impacts may be anticipated during construction activities; these impacts are addressed under "Construction" below. The proposed development is not anticipated to generate significant levels of sound, light or glare. That noise which is produced would be likely to occur from those activities normally associated with a residential development. Light and glare, too, would be that associated with vehicular travel to/from and use of this residential complex. Light/glare impacts which do occur should be mitigated by elevation of the living units above surrounding single-family homes and by screening (proposed by the applicant and/or recommended by the staff) of site boundaries with landscaping and fencing. Similarly, noise impacts should be addressed by building elevations. No undue burden is anticipated upon neighboring properties. Some noise and light/glare impacts are expected to the site from vehicular/pedestrian travel on adjacent roadways (Burnett Avenue, Smithers Avenue, South Seventh Street). Similarly, light/glare impacts are expected to neighboring roadways from cars entering onto those rights-of-way. Identified impacts can be mitigated, in part, by design of the access points and parking areas, screening, landscaping and Code-mandated insulation systems for this development. Mitigation Measures: None required in conjunction with operation of the development. Policy Nexus: Not applicable. ercrpt ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE STAFF REPORT ALEXANDER SIX PLEX . APRIL 15, 1992 Page 7 5. Public Services/Utilities a. Fire/Police Impacts: Fire Prevention staff report that adequate emergency service resources are available to serve the site, with standard improvements, such as hydrants, accesses, and sprinklers (in the living units and in the parking garage). Emergency vehicles can travel to the site within the preferred five minute maximum travel time, however, the applicant will be called upon to participate in the pending Fire Benefit Zone, which will result in required contributions for all new development to mitigate community-wide fire service impacts. As the Benefit Zone is not yet approved, the applicant will be called upon to make a voluntary contribution. In the event that the pending Fire Benefit Zone is adopted by City Council prior to issuance of the building permit for this project, the applicant will be required to provide such a contribution -- now estimated to be $470.00 per unit -- to that Benefit Zone. Mitigation Measures: Staff will recommend,that the applicant be called upon to make a fair share contribution to the Fire Benefit Zone. Policy Nexus: Fire Benefit Zone b. Storm Water Drainage Storm drainage management plans will be required to be designed (in compliance with the Surface and Storm Water Management Ordinance) to address the fact that the site is located in an area in which the water table is located within six to twelve feet of ground level elevation. Of particular concern is storm water management for the proposed subterranean garage; special water control mechanisms will be required for the subterranean parking area to ensure that flooding does not occur and that contaminants from automobiles in the parking area are properly drained -- e.g., storm water and water table overflow to be directed into the storm drainage system and sprinkler water into the sanitary sewer. c. Utilities Storm water lines, sanitary sewers and water lines are available to the site from lines variously located in Burnett Avenue and/or South 7th Street. Thus, utilities and infrastructure are generally sufficient to serve this development (with standard connections and improvement fees). A SUCC fee of $4,890.00 is estimated. d. Schools Impacts: The proposed six-unit residential complex is anticipated to have approximately eleven residents, including three school-aged children. No undue burden is anticipated upon school facilities in conjunction with this development. e. Recreation Based upon the small size of the project site, together with its unusual configuration, there is limited space for on-site recreation facilities. These facilities will not be required since Burnett Linear Park, which has active/passive facilities for children and adults, is immediately ercrpt J ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE S i, rr REPORT ALEXANDER SIX PLEX KPRIL 15, 1992 Page 8 adjacent to this development. However, staff will recommend that the applicant support regional public recreation facilities through a contribution toward improvements of facilities in the Central Renton area. Mitigation Measures: Staff will recommend that the applicant address impacts to regional recreation facilities by providing a voluntary contribution of $180.00 per unit (as established in the Comprehensive Parks Plan), Policy Nexus: Environmental Review Ordinance; Comprehensive Parks Plan. 6. Construction - Impacts: Standard construction-related impacts (e.g., noise, dust, debris, traffic) are anticipated in conjunction with the proposed development. Standard construction mitigation measures will be established. Mitigation Measures: Staff will recommend that the applicant be required to provide a standard construction mitigation plan. Policy Nexus: Environmental Review Ordinance. r , tt : .:.: ercrpt 4110 %!z- CITY IIcRENTON Planning/Building/Public Works Department Earl Clymer, Mayor Lynn Guttmann,Administrator April 8, 1992 Edward Gonzales 11015-142nd Ave SE Renton,WA 98056 SUBJECT: Alexander Place ECF;SA;V-150-90 Dear Mr. Gonzales: Pursuant to our telephone conversation of today, I am confirming that the Technical Advisory Committee has completed review of the Alexander Six-Plex. .•It will be reviewed by the Environmental Review Committee on April 15, 1992, if the following materials have been provided by noon on April 13: o One 8.5"x 11'PMT reduction (white)for each plan sheet revised. o One colored (hearing/meeting display) copy of your revised site plan and revised landscaping plan. (Please see attachment for specific instructions as to how to prepare - this map). If these materials are not available by noon on April 13,then we will reschedule the project to be evaluated by the Environmental Review Committee at a later date. Additionally, draft comments from technical staff describing the likely major on-site and off—site improvements which will be required for the Alexander Six-Plex are listed below. As you know, I have scheduled a meeting on April 22nd at 1:00 p.m. so that staff can be available to discuss these matters with you. NOTE #1: The applicant may be required to provide Code-mandated improvements, including, but not limited to: a) insulation to limit interior ambient sound levels to 50 dBA (EPA.Noise Standards); b) Special Utility Connection Charges fees in the amount of $4,890.00; and c) life safety improvements (e.g. hydrants, sprinklers to dwelling units and the garage, etc.). NOTE#2: At the time of site plan and/or building permit review, recommendations will be made for the specifications for required on-site and off-site improvements (e.g., sidewalks, size of driveway throats, location of lighting standards) to comply with Code requirements. For example, the entry drive on Burnett Avenue will need to be relocated so that it is a minimum of 50 feet north of South 7th Street. Along South 7th street, a nine foot wide easement (or dedication) shall be provided, in order to accommodate a five foot wide sidewalk, street lighting and a four foot wide planter strip. Sidewalks will need to be replaced on Smithers Avenue. Some improvements to curb radii and to lighting will be necessary'on Burnett Avenue as well. NOTE #3: The applicant will be required to provide storm drainage management plans designed (in compliance with the Surface and Storm Water Management Ordinance) to address the fact that the underlying water table is located within six to twelve feet of ground level elevation. At the time of site plan/building permit review, special water 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 • 'I control mechanisms (e.g. sump pump, floor drains) will be required for the subterranean parking area to direct storm water and water table overflows to the storm water system and sprinkler water to the sanitary sewer to ensure that flooding does not occur and that contaminants from automobiles in the parking area are not introduced Into the storm drainage system. Please contact me, at 235-2550, if you have any questions. Sincerely, Lenora Blauman Project Manager cc: Sylvia Alexander • . II I, II jl iI I i - ; CIT`_ OF RENTON ..rL :•• '~ Planning/Building/Public Works Department • Earl Clymer, Mayor Lynn Guttmann,Administrator March 24, 1992 Edward Gonzales 11015 - 142nd Ave SE Renton, WA 98056 SUBJECT: Alexander Place ECF;SA;V-150-90 Dear Mr. Gonzales: The Development Planning Section of the City of Renton has formally accepted the revisions to the above-referenced application for preliminary review. It is tentatively scheduled for consideration by the Technical Advisory Committee on April 7, 1992. Following that review, the project will be submitted to the Environmental Review Committee for a threshold determination. Site plan review will follow the completion of the environmental review. A determination has been made that site plan review can be handled administratively (unless controversial issues arise that require review by the Hearing Examiner). Following site plan action, the variance applications will be submitted to the Board of Adjustment for their review and action. It is likely that the entire review process can be completed in approximately 12 weeks. Please contact me, at 235-2550, if you have any questions. Sincerely, Lenora Blauman Project Manager cc: Sylvia Alexander 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 DDI — Architecture & Planning eitar&rty geari March 24, 1992 City of Renton Community Development Department Municipal Building 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 RE: Burnett, and Smithers Variance Current zoning code restrictions are as follows: Smithers Ave. S. (Front Yard) - 20'-0" Burnett Ave S. (Front Yard) - 25'-0" S. 7th Street (Front Yard) - 25'-0" Variance to Front Yard Setbacks are requested as follows: Smithers Ave. S. - 12' front yard setback (8' less) Burnette Ave. S. - 15' front yard setback (10' less) Justification of Variance for your Consideration: a. An undue hardship exists at this site due to its irregular shape and the existence of 3 separate 'front' yards. b. The granting of a variance n this site would not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in the vicinity and zone. The property is currently abandoned and overgrown with vegetation. An attractive apartment would be a definite improvement to the neighborhood. The neighborhood is currently composed of multi-use with single family, du-plexes, apartments, commercial, and light industrial uses in the immediate area. Great care has been taken to design a building that will be aesthetically pleasing to the neighborhood in both style and scale. c. An approval of this Variance would not constitute any special privilege. This is a very unique parcel with an equally unique set of restrictions. (American Blind, at the corner of Smithers and 6th Street has been built at or very near the front property lines. d. The variance requested is the minimum required to successfully develop this property. The setback on the west side of the property will remain 12'-0" (along Smithers Avenue) and 15'-0" on the east (along Burnette). Thank you for your consideration. Regards id? ffr y D. Spri g A .A. Pres dent Suite 109 5540 Lake Washington Blvd. N.E. Kirkland, Washington 98033 206/822-1724 CIT = _� OF RENTON 1'11. Planning/Building/Public Works Department Earl Clymer, Mayor Lynn Guttmann,Administrator March 20, 1992 Edward Gonzales 11015- 142nd Ave SE Renton,WA 98056 SUBJECT: Alexander Place ECF;SA;V-150-90 Dear Mr.Gonzales: I am writing to confirm our discussion concerning your recent submittals for the Alexander Six-Plex. As we agreed, the current design for the project will require variances for setbacks from S.W. 7th Street (the front yard which would normally require a 25 foot setback); and variances from Burnett Avenue and from Smithers Avenue(side yards which would normally require a 20 foot setback). We agreed that you would provide variance applications on March 24th,—when the variance applications are received, we will circulate the application for staff review. It should then be,evaluated by the Technical Advisory Committee on April ?and by the Environmental Review Committee on April 14. It is anticipated that the Environmental Review Committee will issue an environmental threshold determination on that date. A fifteen day comment period and then a 14 day appeal period will follow the issuance of the determination. Following the end of the environmental appeal period, the City is authorized to begin site plan review for the project. In order to begin that review, however, we must have a site plan which meets all development standards for the R-4 zone (4-31-8B). Particular attention will need to be paid to setbacks and to lot coverage. At present the proposed lot coverage exceeds the 30%maximum permitted by Code. When all required materials are received in our office,we will be able to complete the necessary reviews. Please contact me, at 235-2550, if you have any questions. Sincerely, Lenora Blauman Project Manager cc: Sylvia Alexander 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton. Washington 98055 % CIT ._ ;OF RENTON • Planning/Building/Public Works Department Earl Clymer, Mayor Lynn Guttmann,Administrator February 20, 1992 Sylvia Alexander 3826 S 288th Auburn,WA 98001 SUBJECT: Alexander Six-Plex ECF;SA;V-150-90 Dear Mrs.Alexander: This letter is written as a follow-up to your recent discussion with Lenora Blauman concerning the status of the above-referenced project. As she explained in that conversation, this project has been on inactive status for more than six months. • Under City Policy, in order for us to continue to process this project,we will need the following information from you by March 18, 1992: o A letter of intent to pursue the application. o All site plans and engineering plans which are outstanding (see communications of July, 1991 for specific requirements). o Materials necessary to demonstrate that plans are consistent with current City requirements for development and for infrastructure improvements. Unless these materials are submitted by this date, the City will, regrettably, be required to close this project file. In the event that the file is closed, we would encourage you to reapply to the City when you are ready to pursue this application. The requirements and fees for reactivating an inactive/closed file would be the same as for opening a new file. If you have questions or would like additional information, please contact me or Lenora Blauman, project manager,at 235-2550. We look forward to continuing to work with you to complete this project. Si ely, Donald K Erickson,AICP Zoning Administrator cc: Ed Gonzales 11015-142nd Ave SE • Renton,WA 98056 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 SI r %0 CIT A_ OF RENTON baLL Planning/Building/Public Works Department Earl Clymer, Mayor Lynn Guttmann,Administrator October 4, 1991 Ed Gonzales 11015 142nd Avenue S.E. Renton,Washington 98056 RE: Alexander Six Plex(150-90) Dear Mr. Gonzales: This letter is written as a follow-up to my correspondence of September 25th. As I explained in that letter, under City regulation, in order for our review of the Alexander project to be completed in 1991, all revised application materials needed to be submitted by October 1st. As of today,these materials have not yet been received, and I have not received a reply to my telephone messages. Therefore, regrettably, I will not be able to include this project on the Hearing Examiner's 1991 schedule. Given the fact that you are apparently encountering difficulty in obtaining complete application materials for this project, I suggest that: o you request that the City place the project on inactive status • or o you withdraw the application and reapply when the materials become available. - I shall await your written instruction on your preference for the disposition of this project. If I do not have any message from you by October 15, 1991, I shall place the project on inactive status, where it may remain until January 2, 1992. After that date, if the materials are not complete,the City will return the application materials to you for future resubmittal. I look forward to working with you to complete this project in a timely manner. If you have any questions or would like additional information, please contact me at 235-2550. Sincerely, Lenora Blauman Project Manager cc: Sylvia Alexander 3826 South 288th Auburn, Washington 98001 • 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 116 =:4: - CIT'_ OF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works Department Earl Clymer, Mayor Lynn Guttmann,Administrator September 25, 1991 Ed Gonzales - 11015 142nd Avenue S.E. Renton,Washington 98056 RE: Alexander Six Plex(150-90) Dear Mr. Gonzales: This letter is written to inform you that, in order to achieve the now tentatively established public hearing date of November 26, 1991,for the above-referenced project, all required (complete) materials must be submitted to the City by no later than 5:00 p.m. on October 1, 1991, under City regulations. (Approximately seven to eight weeks of review and comment period are required, so that it is no longer possible to conduct a hearing earlier than November 26th.) If materials are received after October 1st,they will be reviewed in a timely manner, however,the public hearing will need to be rescheduled to January or February of 1992, based upon the need for an adequate review/comment period and upon the fact that the Hearing Examiner's schedule is established with other projects during the month of December 1991 and a portion of January 1992. If you have any questions or would like additional information, please contact me at 235-2550. • Sincerely, Lenora Blaurnan Project Manager cc: Sylvia Alexander 3826 South 288th Auburn,Washington 98001 • 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 W EClient: Fanco Construction/CJ Inc. Report No. : 001q D Project Location: William Ave WEC Project No.: 9108-01 g GRenton Inspector: J. Rabe EPermit No.: pending Date: 8/7/91 Proj. Name: 6 Story Project `» �'v'`"" >rti•>:.;:� •:�:.;:;as:ad`: AeguIxs>» `< >»>''�� <<» `< <<�'�?� mi��#�>�<<>>`:�€`>��' ��#''<`<<��>'': :<.;;:.;>;;;;;:;::>:::<:<::::>::•;::;;;•;;:•;:;•:;«:•;::;>;:::::>:•::<_::•:•::•:>:::s.:;;•>:•:%z�:;:<:;�;>::; ;«ualty..G..atr�l...I:>�{tle�lfq� :....... :.. Intitial site visit to verify geoexploration access. Site is within one block of existing Cedar River channel.The writer has personal knowledge of peat deposits in the general vicinity The site may also be in an area where the river was channelled in the past, therefore a minimum of two hollow stem agar borings are reccommended for foundation design criteria development The site is flat, covered with tall grass and bordered on three sides by existing single family type structures. No overhead obstacles were noted. Acces from street is feasible. Address of home to the south is Williams. g �� , 7 4,9 >:>•aif`'>Coritr.�i �,e:;;.;>;:.;:€€�"'i>:i `seal#i;i�� �`>>`> >> ':> >» >> >s<:`> >>>>€> : ':s>:: s>z<::�<>:�:>:: NA • Returned to office to set up drilling equipment operations. Began project information sheet and started quality assurance plan. All items inspected are CQC Representative: Jeff Rabe Conforming Non-ConformingN/A Manager: C. Weaver to approved plans and specifications. ',1 All reports are considered confidential and are the property of the Client and Wedge Engineering Corporation. Reproduction in whole or in part without the written permission of WEC is forbidden. ENGINEERING 20656 84th Ave. S., Kent, WA 98032 (206) 872-9451 FAX (206) 872-9454 >:»>:IG�RJ�f�1� ...R W �»»?�>•'<>>':i�><>�?�'>>> '<»« ><»`•.':<>��>?>'s€>�<', ''s:»::>�13�11«X:#€Qt°!iq#�Il'Y... . EClient: Fanco Const./CJ Inc. Report No. : 003q D Project Location: 6 Story Williams Ave N WEC Project No.: 9108-01 g GRenton, WA Inspector: Jeff Rabe E Permit No.: Pending Date: 8/8/91 Proj. Name: Renton,Williams Ave. 6 Story Project Prepared Quality Assurance Plan for geotechnical study. See attached QAP. NA 1. ........ ................................ .............. ..... .... ....................z'�3'�e'.rriiar�f$y 5 ><>':>> '>`?<>r�<':>><>># ? > � ': ?^''`>?>'s>'»�:.:: ::. NA CIX OF REN I LAN AU3 1 3 1991 DiVYS ON All items inspected are CQC Representative: Jeff Rabe Conforming Non-Conforming . Manager: C.Weaver k to approved plans and specifications. All reports are considered confidential and are the property of the Client and Wedge Engineering Corporation. Reproduction in whole or in part without the written permission of WEC is forbidden. ENGINEERING 20656 84th Ave. S., Kent, WA 98032 • (206) 872-9451 FAX (206) 872-9454 42, CITI_ OF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works Department Earl Clymer, Mayor Lynn Guttman,Administrator July 26, 1991 Jeff Spring DDI Architects 5540 Lake Wash Blvd NE Kirkland, WA 98033 RE: Alexander Six Plex (150-90) Dear Mr. Spring: This letter is written to inquire as to your progress on developing revised plans for access and setbacks for the above-referenced project (per our conversation of June 10, 1991 and written correspondence, dated June 27, 1991). As.I reported in our earlier conversation and correspondence, the City is eager to bring this project to a timely conclusion and we will resume processing of this application immediately upon receipt of the revised plans. If you have any questions or would like additional information, please contact me at 235-2550. Sincerely, , Lenora Blauman Project Manager cc: E. Gonzales 11015 142nd Avenue S.E. Renton, Washington 98056 Sylvia Alexander 3826 South 288th Auburn, Washington 98001 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton. Washington 98055 CITY ,,.CIF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works Department Earl Clymer, Mayor Lynn Guttman,Administrator June 27, 1991 Jeff Spring DDI Architects 5540 Lake Wash Blvd NE Kirkland,WA 98033 RE: Alexander Six Plex(150-90) Dear Mr. Spring: This letter is written to confirm our conversation of June 10, 1991. In that conversation, I reported that our staff has reviewed the revised site plan for the above-referenced project and has approved your proposal to site the entry drive on Burnett Avenue. This access point will need to be a minimum of 50 feet north of S.W. 7th Avenue to meet City Ordinance. With respect to location of the structure, staff would recommend that the front facade of the building (exclusive of the entry way stairs) be set back twenty feet from the property line on S.W. 7th Street. The subterranean parking garage may be located within the 20 foot set back area. In this way, there will need to be only a minimal variance (if one is necessary at all) from the required twelve foot rear yard set back; staff would prefer the largest feasible rear set back, in order to provide adequate separation between this development and the neighboring single-family home. As I reported in our conversation, the City will resume processing of this application immediately upon receipt of the revised plans. The narrative materials in support of the variance should also be submitted at this time, however, if it is more convenient you may submit that material no later than four weeks prior to the public hearing for this project. When the new plans are received, the project will be scheduled for evaluation by the Environmental Review Committee and for public hearing with the Hearing Examiner. If you have any questions or would like additional information, please contact meat 235-2550. Sincerely, G2feeszt_ Lenora Blauman Project Manager _ cc: E. Gonzalez 11015 142nd Avenue S.E. Renton,Washington 98056 Sylvia Alexander 3826 South 288th Auburn,Washington 98001 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 • CIT OF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works Department Earl Clymer, Mayor Lynn Guttman,Administrator April 22, 1991 E. M. Gonzalez 11015 142nd Avenue S.E. Renton,Washington 98056 RE: Alexander Six-Plex;Williams Avenue Multi-Family Complex Dear Mr. Gonzalez: I am writing to follow-up on my letter of March 26, 1991, concerning our meetings of March 19, 1991 for the above-referenced projects. Both in that letter and during those meetings we agreed upon revised materials to be submitted and concurred that the project would remain on"hold" until materials were received by the City. Specifically,for the Alexander Six-Plex,we agreed that Jeff Spring will be modifying design plans for this development to locate the access on Smithers Avenue, based upon requirements established by the Transportations Systems Division and the Public Works Department. This modification will also necessitate some changes to the design of the parking garage, screening plans and landscaping plans. For the Williams Avenue Multi-Family Complex we agreed that GMS would modify plans for this development to redesign parking and enhance landscaping through: 1) increased plantings on the south boundary;2)the addition of a berm and increased plantings within that berm on the western boundary. To date these materials have not been submitted. If complete and satisfactory revisions are provided to our office prior to May 1, 1991, staff will make every effort to complete the review process by June 30, 1991 for the Williams Avenue complex and by July 30, 1991 for the Alexander Six-Plex. If materials are submitted • after May 1, 1991, staff will process these materials in a timely manner, but it is likely, based upon existing available resources,that review will extend into the autumn. Also, as I mentioned previously, it is to your benefit to submit materials as soon as possible, as the City's Planning Commission and the City Council are continuing to consider placing a moratorium on new multi- family development in both the R-3 and the R-4 zones in the near future. If you have questions or would like additional information, please contact me at 235-2550. Sincerely, 4 .4„jrnisi Lenora Blauman Project Manager cc: Rick Gulstrom, Sylvia Alexander GMS Architects 3826 So.288th Street Auburn,Washington 98001 Jeff Spring DDI Architects 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 i� >DEPARTMENT::( F.PLANNING :BUILDING Pi BLI:C;`WORKS >'>«:> <<:>' >>> ........ . ... . .... ...: :..:. .:..;. ...... .... . ...... ...... •.....'::::<; ; ;A ::REP€3RT> :< :: : :>.::' >>::': `` : .:..i.:-...:...i:•::..i'*....si...-..i.-.:..........••-.:...,i.......*:...........'.:...-......:..:*..........-.‘......-.......".:.-f..:.-i..:.::....:.:::.'.:.':.".:-•...•::..::H.::...••:.:.-:*..::-:.*..:..:.:. •▪.-..:. PR(� 07. : .:.: .;.:...:..::.::. .:.;::;.....:;Alexander Six:Alex.;•• ;:.>::.:'..:.. .::.;:.;:...: .;.: ':.- ENVIRON#iAkNa'At GI ICi L€ T:< :: ''EG SA;V . .54= Q:;::> >: > :.. .>..;:;; <''; ;: <: ''; ; ;' ' :< :<: ::" :::;. '::;: .:< 7501#' 10N::4 ::t'I0#'t :Sl:: :::::: . `The:a licarit:.is':-atelcm :•:.: :;:adrnt�itirative:sl ) rr::a r vl:for::: ..:.:.....:!.:...:i„:.....:.:....,::...:....:.:::.:::.-:.::......::.: :::*::...:::.....!..:... ....:....:: Ali...':.. ':..'.':. ... :.:: >': ...::: . . t.t! ::.. ..'::::::..: :.;::>::.::.:pp: ?::.:..:.:.... .:.::..... :...... . :: ::` six:unit. multi$aiariil}I: esidential':complex {2); '>vaiianc from;:setbacl :•:requirements::fir::the::Burnett:sAven e? < frontage:and::the Smithers::Avenue;fronta e: via: o...` ` ... ,'...,_ .. . . .. ... ! the o. and.„f•Adjrjstment}.. „:::::::.>:;: :•': :<::'::: `:: LOCATION OF;PROPOSAI:r•>::::::`:::::....''.:: `633::Buirnett Avenue::Sauth.::>::;::....: ::..:::.::>,:::;:::.. : . >::::::;: ISSUES >':::::::`>: ::`::: ;:;:,:.; ::::: . ::;;:::::::.>:;.. ' Lanii`';Use.::Aesthetics .;;Eartli,'.;Water Trans ort:.tion ::'.Envir 'rim n t': '::..::Heattl :lNo1se,..,4glytZGl : : Axr:.Quahtvl;:Pub�••S" : es,..I ublic Utilat►es'>::.::. :::::>tat.::::::::< :: ....". :< . >:.' ::.:: : :.::::::.:: ::.:.::`::REC..olvl t NQ, TIO ISM..;:: : ::.: .:'.:;. ::::;.::; :;staff;reccamm r d: ha# the•>: nvir iamen a::: euleiv:'Cur niititee:isse:::: : : : :Determination:of.4on-Si.gn1ficanlce,':rfl: gated, for`the.above-described::six;unit residentia...., plea witFi:'°' he ▪ con. tons. ererpt-2 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE REPORT ALEXANDER SIX PLEX APRIL 15, 1992 Page 2 • ercrpt-2 • • • • ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE S`'r;;:;;REPORT ALEXANDER SIX PLEX APRIL 15, 1992 Page 3 Staff recommend that the Environmental Review Committee issue a Determination of Non-Significance, Mitigated, for the above-described six unit residential complex, with the following conditions: Earth/Air/Water/Environmental Health • 1. The applicant shall, in order to mitigate impacts to earth, air, water, noise impacts, and light/glare impacts, provide a construction plan including the following components: a) an erosion control element; b) an element for periodic watering of the site to reduce dust; c) an element for wheel washing of construction vehicles prior to their departure from the site to reduce dust; d) a schedule which confines construction operations to the hours between 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. on weekdays and 8:00 a.m. - 5:00 p.m. on Saturdays; and d) a renewable $2000.00 cash deposit (or other acceptable surety device) to be provided by the applicant to the City for street cleaning. These plans should be provided and fees paid prior to the issuance of building permits; the plans should be in effect for the duration of construction. • Recreation 2. The applicant shall be encouraged, in order to mitigate regional recreation impacts, to provide a voluntary contribution of $1080.00 toward improvements to regional recreation facilities in the Central Area of the City. Improvements should be provided or fees contributed prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy. Public Services 3. The applicant shall be encouraged, in order to mitigate emergency services impacts, to provide a voluntary contribution of $2820.00 toward the pending Fire Benefit Zone. Fees should be provided prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy. In the event that the Fire Benefit Zone is adopted by City Council prior to the issuance of building permits for the project, the applicant may be called upon to make a fair share contribution to that Zone. At the present time, this contribution is estimated to be $470.00 per unit. ADVISORY NOTES TO THE APPLICANT: The following advisory notes are supplementary to the environmental mitigation measures, and are intended to provide information in conjunction with the environmental determination of non-significance, mitigated. As these . Advisory Notes are for information only, they are not subject to appeal under the environmental threshold determination. 1. The applicant will be required to provide Code-mandated improvements, which may include, but not limited to: (a) insulation to limit interior ambient sound levels to 50 dBA (EPA Noise Standards); (b) SUCC (utility connection) fees in the amount of $4,890.00; and (c) life safety improvements (e.g., hydrants, sprinklers to dwelling units and the garage, etc.). 2. At the time of site plan and/or building permit review, recommendations will be made for the specifications for required on-site and off-site improvements (e.g., sidewalks, size of driveway throats, location of lighting standards) to comply with Code requirements. For example, the entry drive on Burnett Avenue will need to be relocated so that it is a minimum of 50 feet north of South 7th Street. Along South 7th street, a nine foot wide easement (or dedication) will need to be provided, in order to accommodate a five foot wide sidewalk, street lighting and a four foot wide planter strip. Sidewalks shall be replaced on Smithers Avenue. Some improvements to curb radii and to lighting will be required on Burnett Avenue as well. ercrpt-2 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE S i, r-r REPORT ALEXANDER SIX PLEX APRIL 15, 1992 Page 4 3. The applicant will need to provide storm drainage management plans designed (in compliance with the Surface and Storm Water Management Ordinance) to address the fact that the underlying water table is located within six to twelve feet of ground level elevation. At the time of site plan/building permit review, special water control mechanisms (e.g., sump pump, floor drains) will be necessary for the subterranean parking area to direct storm water and water table overflows to the storm water system and sprinkler water to the sanitary sewer to ensure that flooding does not occur and that contaminants from automobiles in the parking area are not introduced into the storm drainage system. 4. The four inch water line along property frontage on Smithers Avenue will need to be upsized to 8". Six inch sewer line along Smithers Avenue will need to be upsized to 8" to first downstream manhole (north of site). 5. At the time of site plan review, staff may establish conditions as necessary to ensure that the project is consistent with criteria in the Site Plan Review Ordinance. For example, in conjunction with site plan review, the applicant will be called upon to provide a landscaping management plan and a landscaping maintenance surety device to protect on-site plantings. '.][XimimpfictjEcip DESCRIPnN :..: The applicant is. seeking to develop a six unit multi-family residential complex on a now vacant 9,100 square foot parcel. The parcel has a triangular configuration; there are frontages on Burnett Avenue, South • Seventh Street, and Smithers Avenue. The site is bounded on the east (Burnett Avenue) and south (S. W. 7th Street) by properties zoned for light industrial use. Burnett Linear Park is also located directly adjacent to the site. To the north and the west are parcels zoned for high density multi-family use (R-4). The proposed development is a three-level multi-family residential complex (approximately 2730 square feet), to be located over a subterranean parking garage (at a total height of approximately 35 feet). Exterior materials are proposed to be wood, stucco and brick. 1. Land Use/Housing Impacts: The subject site is zoned R-4, High Density Multi-Family Use, which allows a maximum density of 35 residential units per acre (or seven units on the .20 acre subject property). The proposed project includes six units (30 units per acre). The planned residential units, with parking, and open space/landscaped area is generally consistent with both density and development standards established for the R-4 zone and criteria established in the Site Plan Review Ordinance. Similarly, the project, as designed by the developer (and/or as recommended by staff), is considered to essentially comply with the City's Parking and Loading Ordinance standards, and with Landscaping Ordinance standards. The proposed use is considered to be generally appropriate for the site, and generally compatible with, although dissimilar from surrounding development. For example, there is light industrial development to the south of the site, but this development is separated from the site by South Seventh Street, which is a collector arterial. Development amenities, such as setbacks, stepped elevations and landscaping, also serve to separate the residences from Seventh Street itself. Light industrial development to the east is separated from the site by the Burnett Avenue Linear Park. Older single-family residential developments, which exist to the west of the site are separated from the subject property by Smithers Avenue; an alley way separates the site from older single-family ercrpt-2 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE STAFF REPORT ALEXANDER SIX PLEX APRIL 15, 1992 Page 5 homes to the north. Impacts to/from those single-family homes will be mitigated, in part, by differences in the elevation of living units, landscaping and setbacks on the subject property proposed by the proponent, and additional amenities recommended by staff in conjunction with land use review (e.g., screening of the parking facilities). Because the site is triangular in configuration, and has frontages on each of the three abutting roadways, three front yard setbacks (twenty feet minimum) and one side yard setback would be customarily required. The applicant is seeking relief from set back requirements through applications for variances. These proposed variances appear to achieve the criteria of the Variance Ordinance. For example, a unique hardship exists, based upon the size, dimensions and shape of this parcel; enforcement of this setback regulation is likely to preclude reasonable development of the site. There is also precedent for such variances. It appears that there would be no deleterious effects on public welfare from such set back revisions; in fact, redevelopment of this abandoned site is likely to improve the appearance of the site, to provide housing opportunities in the downtown area and conserve property values in this district. More specifically, in order to address setback requirements, the applicant is proposing that the South Seventh Street frontage be considered the "front" boundary of the site, and that the main entrance be located along this roadway. Standard 25 foot setbacks would be provided along this frontage. Similarly the set back requirements (12 feet) would be achieved for the northern boundary of the property. The applicant is seeking variances for relief from setback requirements to Burnett Avenue (a 15 foot setback is proposed rather than the customarily required 25 feet) and to Smithers Avenue (a 12 foot setback is proposed here rather than the customarily required 20 feet). Staff supports the specifically proposed variance from set back requirements on Smithers Avenue, based upon the fact that: (a) the proposed set back allows adequate separation of the development from adjacent uses (Smithers Avenue roadway and single-family residences which are on the west side of Smithers Avenue) by elevation of the dwelling units and by a landscape buffer; and (b) there is no entrance to the project along that roadway, so that there is no concern for safe vehicular travel to/from the site. Staff also considers the proposed setback along Burnett Avenue to be acceptable, as: (a) the development is separated from nearby light industrial uses by Burnett Avenue Linear Park; and (b) landscaping and screening of the site (as proposed by the applicant and/or recommended by staff) will be designed to achieve a sense of separation between the development and adjacent uses. The provision of six residential units will not make an appreciable difference in the amount of housing stock; it will increase housing options in this area and will not result in any undue burden upon the City. Mitigation Measures: None required. Policy Nexus: Not applicable. 2. Aesthetics Impacts: The proposed three-level residential complex is planned to be constructed -to include exterior materials of wood, stucco and brick. Parking will be located beneath the living units, and will be partially submerged. The project has been designed to be set back on the site, and developed in a vertical fashion to allow reasonable use of the small, triangular site and to minimize off-site impacts. There will be substantial landscaping introduced around the building and at site boundaries; site boundary landscaping should be designed so that the height of planting materials is ercrpt-2 . ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE S i Al-F REPORT ALEXANDER SIX PLEX APRIL 15, 1992 Page 6 consistent with AASHTO standards, to allow clear field of vision for vehicles and pedestrians. Landscaped trellises will provide a visual screen for the parking facilities and will form a safety barrier as well against the open, subterranean garage. Mitigation Measures: None required in conjunction with environmental review. Policy Nexus: Not applicable. 3. Transportation Impacts: Based upon the proposed six unit development, 42 ADWVTE are expected to be generated. This trip volume/rate is not anticipated to result in significant impacts to the site or to neighboring properties. At the time of site plan and/or building permit review, recommendations will be made for the specifications (e.g., sidewalks, size of driveway throats, location of lighting standards) to comply with Code requirements to ensure safety and efficiency of vehicular and pedestrian travel routes. For example, the entry drive on Burnett Avenue must be relocated so that it is a minimum of 50 feet north of South 7th Street. Along South 7th street, -a nine foot wide dedication of property (or easements) must be provided, in order to accommodate a five foot wide sidewalk, lighting and a four foot wide planter strip. Sidewalks must be replaced on Smithers Avenue. Some improvements to curb radii and to lighting will be required on Burnett Avenue as well. Mitigation Measures: None required in conjunction with environmental review. At the time of site plan and/or building permit review, recommendations will be made for the specifications (e.g., sidewalks, size of driveway throats, location of lighting standards) to comply with Code requirements to ensure safety and efficiency of vehicular and pedestrian travel routes. Some improvements to curb radii and to lighting will be required on Burnett Avenue as well. Policy Nexus: Not applicable. 4. Noise, Light and Glare Impacts: Noise, light and glare impacts may be anticipated during construction activities; these impacts are addressed under "Construction" below. The proposed development is not anticipated to generate significant levels of sound, light or glare. That noise which is produced would be likely to occur from those activities normally associated with a residential development. Light and glare, too, would be that associated with vehicular travel to/from and use of this residential complex. Light/glare impacts which do occur should be mitigated by elevation of the living units above surrounding single-family homes and by screening (proposed by the applicant and/or recommended by the staff) of site boundaries with landscaping and fencing. Similarly, noise impacts should be addressed by building elevations. No undue burden is anticipated upon neighboring properties. Some noise and light/glare impacts are expected to the site from vehicular/pedestrian travel on adjacent roadways (Burnett Avenue, Smithers Avenue, South Seventh Street). Similarly, light/glare ercrpt-2 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE biMrF REPORT ALEXANDER SIX PLEX APRIL 15, 1992 Page 7 impacts are expected to neighboring roadways from cars entering onto those rights-of-way. Identified impacts can be mitigated, in part, by design of the access points and parking areas, screening, landscaping and Code-mandated insulation systems for this development. Mitigation Measures: None required in conjunction with operation of the development. • Policy Nexus: Not applicable. 5. Public Services/Utilities a. Fire/Police Impacts: Fire Prevention staff report that adequate emergency service resources are available to serve the site, with standard improvements, such as hydrants, accesses, and sprinklers (in the living units and in the parking garage). Emergency vehicles can travel to the site within the preferred five minute maximum travel time, however, the applicant will be called upon to participate in the pending Fire Benefit Zone, which will result in required contributions for all new development to mitigate community-wide fire service impacts. As the Benefit Zone is not yet approved, the applicant will be called upon to make a voluntary contribution. In the event that the pending Fire Benefit Zone is adopted by City Council prior to issuance of the building permit for this project, the applicant will be required to provide such a contribution -- now estimated to be $470.00 per unit -- to that Benefit Zone. Mitigation Measures: Staff will recommend that the applicant be called upon to make a fair share contribution to the Fire Benefit Zone. Policy Nexus: Fire Benefit Zone b. Storm Water Drainage Storm drainage management plans will be required to be designed (in compliance with the Surface and Storm Water Management Ordinance) to address the fact that the site is located in an area in which the water table is located within six to twelve feet of ground level elevation. Of particular concern is storm water management for the proposed subterranean garage; special water control mechanisms will be required for the subterranean parking area to ensure that flooding does not occur and that contaminants from automobiles in the parking area are properly drained -- e.g., storm water and water table overflow to be directed into the storm drainage system and sprinkler water into the sanitary sewer. c. Utilities Storm water lines, sanitary sewers and water lines are available to the site from lines variously located in Burnett Avenue and/or South 7th Street. Thus, utilities and infrastructure are generally sufficient to serve this development (with standard connections and improvement fees). A SUCC fee of $4,890.00 is estimated. d. Schools Impacts: The proposed six-unit residential complex is anticipated to have approximately eleven residents, including three school-aged children. No undue burden is anticipated upon school facilities in conjunction with this development. ercrpt-2 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE S i AN:REPORT ALEXANDER SIX PLEX APRIL 15, 1992 Page 8 e. Recreation Based upon the small size of the project site, together with its unusual configuration, there is limited space for on-site recreation facilities. These facilities will not be required since Burnett Linear Park, which has active/passive facilities for children and adults, is immediately adjacent to this development. However, staff will recommend that the applicant support regional public recreation facilities through a contribution toward improvements of facilities in the Central Renton area. Mitigation Measures: Staff will recommend that the applicant address impacts to regional recreation facilities by providing a voluntary contribution of $180.00 per unit (as established in the Comprehensive Parks Plan). Policy Nexus: Environmental Review Ordinance; Comprehensive Parks Plan. 6. Construction Impacts: Standard construction-related impacts (e.g., noise, dust, debris, traffic) are anticipated in conjunction with the proposed development. Standard construction mitigation measures will be established. Mitigation Measures: Staff will recommend that the applicant be required to provide a standard construction mitigation plan. Policy Nexus: Environmental Review Ordinance. M ENS F VIE ING. EPA : <::<::::>:::;>::>:::>: : »> ><< > mm;m`nomm<><> «nm < <<m :>'?<CO......M. ....T�O.....REVIEWING.:.DEPARTN►ENTS »::::;::> .:::::a.:: 0 C.0.49Part.:..e:.ts::: +ae..rqu PrgO::aril:; .a....mr> e1)100 M9PI ::pra]ec .:.OS corn.ments::atC0t.taghed,:>:.;:.: • • ercrpt-2 CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE MEETING NOTICE APRIL 15, 1992 To: Lynn Guttmann, Planning/Building/Public Works Administrator John Webley, Community Services Administrator Lee Wheeler, Fire Chief From: ryl, Don Erickson, Secretary Meeting',Date: Wednesday, April 15, 1992 Time: 9:00 AM Location: Third Floor Conference Room Agenda listed below. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA APRIL 15, 1992 Third Floor Conference Room Commencing at 9:00 AM NEW ALEXANDER PLACE SIX-PLEX ECF;SA;V-150-90 (LENORA BLAUMAN: 6168) Applicant is seeking: (1) site plan approval for a six-unit multi-family residential complex; (2) a variance from setback requirements for Burnett Avenue and (3) a variance from setback requirements for Smithers Avenue. The project is located at 633 Burnett Avenue. ONB ADDITION LUA-92-049-BSP;SA (LENORA BLAUMAN: 6168) Applicant seeks to: (1) obtain a binding site plan to subdivide the existing 1 .41 acre site into two parcels (Parcel "A" at .84 acres and Parcel "B" at .56 acres); (2) obtain site plan approval to construct an approximately 5,200 sf addition to the existing Old National Bank building. The proposed structure is to be architecturally integrated with the existing development. The project is located at the SW corner of NE 4th St and Bremerton Ave N. KC TRANSFER STATION CONDITIONAL USE CU;ECF-160-90B (PAUL FORSANDER: 6167) Sewer and Utility Upgrade, parking area paving and recycling area paving. The project is located at 3021 NE 4th St. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW CON EE MEETING NOTICE APRIL 15, 1992 PAGE 2 RECONSIDERATION BOEING COMMERCIAL AIRPLANE COMPANY CUSTOMER SERVICE TRAINING CENTER LUA-92-006-ECF;SA;SSM;V (LENORA BLAUMAN: 6168) The Boeing Company is seeking site plan approval for the development of a training center complex (CSTC) to provide specialized flight simulation instruction for airline transport pilots. The project is located on Longacres Drive, south of 1-405 and north of SW 19th Street (if extended). cc: J. Covington, Executive Assistant to the Mayor L. Warren, City Attorney F. Kaufman, Hearing Examiner G. Gotti, Fire Marshal J. Hanson, Development Services P. Pierce, P/B/PW Admin DEPARTML:- l OF PLANNING/BUIL-DING/.= BLIC WORKS ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT:"TY S P }`eL OY1 DATE CIRCULATED: 03/25/92 COMMENTS DUE: 04/07/92 APPLICATION NO: ECF;SA;V-150-90 PROPONENT: ED GONZALES PROJECT TITLE: ALEXANDER PLACE PROJECT MANAGER: LENORA BLAUMAN (6168) BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: THE APPLICANT IS SEEKING: (1) SITE PLAN APPROVAL FOR A 6-UNIT MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL COMPLEX; (2) A VARIANCE FROM SETBACK REQUIREMENTS FOR BURNETT AVENUE AND SMITHERS AVENUE. THIS PROJECT WAS INITIALLY SUBMITTED AND REVIEWED IN 1990; RECOMMENDATIONS FOR MODIFICATIONS WERE MADE AT THAT TIME. REVISIONS HAVE BEEN SUBMITTED AT THIS TIME -- COPIES OF NEW PLANS AND YOUR ORIGINAL COMMENTS ARE PROVIDED FOR YOUR INFORMATION. LOCATION: 633 BURNETT AVENUE SITE AREA: BUILDING AREA (gross): IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS: PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth c/ 2. Air 3. Water 4. Plants 5. Animals 6. Energy & Natural Resources 7. Environmental Health 8. Land & Shoreline Use 9. Housing 10. Aesthetics 11. Light & Glare 12. Recreation 13. Historic & Cultural Preservation 14. Transportation 15. Public Services Gi 16. Utilities envrvsht Rev.12l91 4 i COMMENTS: • WA.? • f " We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. i-ziel'2) /Y92 Signature of Director or Autorized Re esentative Da envrvsht Rev.12/91 Development Services Review Comments-Transportation 633 Burnett Avenue Proposed 6-Plex April 3, 1991 1. Burnett Ave S., near north property line, Puget's pole anchor is located in•the sidewalk and is a hazard to pedestrians and future occupants of apartment. Developer to initiate relocation of anchor to back of sidewalk with Puget Sound power&Light Company. Show relocation on sidewalk plan. 2. S. 7th Street -- A five foot sidewalk and 4-foot planter strip required the length of the property frontage. Nine feet of right-of-way dedication is required to install the sidewalk and planter strip or a sidewalk easement may be provided in lieu of dedication of right-of-way. 3. Burnett Ave S. &S. 7th St. Intersection--Curb radius to be a minimum of 20-feet per code. 4. Burnett Ave S. -- Driveway as proposed is 43-feet from the intersection at S. 7th Street. The minimum driveway distance to the intersection is 50-feet. The driveway must be located 7-feet to the north to provide the minimum clears from an intersection. 5. Smithers Ave S. -- Sidewalk is in bad repair and required to be replaced., Show provision on the sidewalk drawings. City•standards required to be show on sidewalk drawing. 6. Variance from setback request --The clear zones for the intersections of S. 7th St. &Smithers and for the intersection of S. 7th St. &Burnett Ave S. has been clearly strip on the submitted drawing. The clear zone is marked off in accordance with AASHTO (American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials). For traffic safety reasons nothing in this zone is to be allowed that is higher than 2 1�2-ft. Parking must be-underground to clear this zone and building must be back of this clear zone. 92CEM051 P y i f r • DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET APPLICATION NO: ECF;SA;V-150-90 PROPONENT: Ed Gonzales PROJECT TITLE: Alexander Place PROJECT MANAGER: Lenora Blauman (6168) BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The applicant is seeking: (1) site plan approval for a 6-unit multi-family residential complex; (2) a variance from setback requirements for Burnett Avenue and Smithers Avenue. This project was initially submitted and reviewed in 1990; recommendations for modifications were made at that time. Revisions have been submitted at this time -- copies of new plans and your original comments are provided for your information. LOCATION: SEC: 17, 18, 19 & 20 TWNSHP: 23N RNG: 5E 633 Burnett Avenue TO: PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION SCHEDULED TAC DATE: 04/07/92 ENGINEERING SECTION TRAFFIC ENGINEERING SECTION UTILITIES ENGINEERING SECTION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU - POLICE DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION CONSTRUCTION FIELD SERVICES DEVELOPMENT PLANNING PLANNING & TECHNICAL SERVICES PARKS & RECREATION DIVISION OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE DEVELOPMENT PLANNING SECTION BY 5:00 PM ON APRIL 2, 1992. ALEXANDER PLACE PAGE 2 ' a REVIEWING ;DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: � � l� 1C�' APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED 1 r W792-Z---h { I ' I DATE: ",/2 SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHOR! D REPRESENTATIVE devrvsht Rev.3/92 r r Development Services Review Comments-Transportation 633 Burnett Avenue Proposed 6-Plex April 3, 1991 1. Burnett Ave S., near north property line, Puget's pole anchor is located in the sidewalk and is a hazard to pedestrians and future occupants of apartment. Developer to initiate relocation of anchor to back of sidewalk with Puget Sound power&Light Company. Show relocation on sidewalk plan. 2. S. 7th Street — A five foot sidewalk and 4-foot planter strip required the length of the property frontage. Nine feet of right-of-way dedication is required to install the sidewalk and planter strip or a sidewalk easement may be provided in lieu of dedication of right-of-way. 3. Burnett Ave S. &S. 7th St. Intersection--Curb radius to be a minimum of 20-feet per code. 4. Burnett Ave S. — Driveway as proposed is 43-feet from the intersection at S. 7th Street. The minimum driveway distance to the intersection is 50-feet. The driveway must be located 7-feet to the north to provide the minimum clears from an intersection. 5. Smithers Ave S. — Sidewalk is in bad repair and required to be replaced. Show provision on the sidewalk drawings. City standards required to be show on sidewalk drawing. 6. Variance from setback request --The clear zones for the intersections of S. 7th St. &Smithers and for the intersection of S. 7th St. &Burnett Ave S. has been clearly strip on the submitted drawing. The clear zone is marked off in accordance with AASHTO (Anierican Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials). For traffic safety reasons nothing in this zone is to be allowed that is higher than 2 1/2-ft. Parking must be-underground to clear this zone and building must be back of this clear zone. 92CEM051 DEPARTMEII OF PLANNING/BUILDING/f' 13LIC WORKS ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Ur L41A DATE CIRCULATED: 03/25/92 COMME w '/O7/92 APPLICATION NO: ECF;SA;V-150-90APR 7 1992 PROPONENT: ED GONZALES PROJECT TITLE: ALEXANDER PLACE PROJECT MANAGER: LENORA BLAUMAN (6168) BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: THE APPLICANT IS SEEKING: (1) SITE PLAN APPROVAL FOR A 6-UNIT MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL COMPLEX; (2) A VARIANCE FROM SETBACK REQUIREMENTS FOR BURNETT AVENUE AND SMITHERS AVENUE. THIS PROJECT WAS INITIALLY SUBMITTED AND REVIEWED IN 1990; RECOMMENDATIONS FOR MODIFICATIONS WERE MADE AT THAT TIME. REVISIONS HAVE BEEN SUBMITTED AT THIS TIME -- COPIES OF NEW PLANS AND YOUR ORIGINAL COMMENTS ARE PROVIDED FOR YOUR INFORMATION. LOCATION: 633 BURNETT AVENUE SITE AREA: • . BUILDING AREA (gross): IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS: PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth 2. Air 3. Water V 4. Plants 5. Animals 6. Energy & Natural Resources 7. Environmental Health 8. Land & Shoreline Use 9. Housing 10. Aesthetics 11. Light & Glare 12. Recreation . 13. Historic & Cultural Preservation 14. Transportation 15. Public Services V 11, 16. Utilities envrvsht Rev.12/81 COMMENTS: ` 1. r x/ 6°4 7 /c /44/'S'5 MO E//, PI7 /i"/C z c)/), 7 l' /�' �L.ayy ieq/ ,',s zS' `rG //V, 406/6 fotr4/ 7T. p/Po ' C7 1VO7 Clsrmel/\f y o ool ,9 p4 mg7M 3. fritip_. %11 - 2oty a /q6 ' lyg 7 / er-eept_e_ch?- We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. - Sign•ture of/iiAtor or Au rized Representative Date envrvsht Rev.12/91 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET APPLICATION NO: ECF;SA;V-150-90 PROPONENT: Ed Gonzales PROJECT TITLE: Alexander Place PROJECT MANAGER: Lenora Blauman (6168) BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The applicant is seeking: (1) site plan approval for a 6-unit multi-family residential complex; (2) a variance from setback requirements for Burnett Avenue and Smithers Avenue. This project was initially submitted and reviewed in 1990; recommendations for modifications were made at that time. Revisions have been submitted at this time -- copies of new plans and your original comments are provided for your information. LOCATION: SEC: 17, 18, 19 & 20 TWNSHP: 23N RNG: 5E 633 Burnett Avenue TO: PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION SCHEDULED TAC DATE: 04/07/92 ENGINEERING SECTION TRAFFIC ENGINEERING SECTION UTILITIES ENGINEERING SECTION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT ,i DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION CONSTRUCTION FIELD SERVICES DEVELOPMENT PLANNING PLANNING & TECHNICAL SERVICES PARKS & RECREATION DIVISION OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE DEVELOPMENT PLANNING SECTION BY 5:00 PM ON APRIL 2, 1992. ALEXANDER PLL CE PAGE 2 , REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: /"G+/o R IO'r e-4 ' i . APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS X NOT APPROVED I i• • p �r�r �✓Gr1Cr r✓ti^i�n �/n�JrO,��,.,,,,I . r,;�1 �r.�Gt^$In.,r. - "• l:eli✓i t7J SFO�rr tt• I ins r CH- s v'l �1r1'r.PS. •r^,,Y dcvrf� ��) eXifvis I e n o F. 1r--- 1rn 1 1 I,c 'vie Si zoo( fo ' RA el ex . (Air{rd -11 Pt hoor4 fr —ei, lire jn o(' v4v Gtrromed c r rire1 l oW 4 oi•.r eXisir►l .I'hR11 Vr. ��r•✓.t67ry s/v,, ✓, evi e 9 Of rvc ! yel v�''l� Fire proqc.c:l 10,\ sp . dOr'hes-t-ic �roc} se-ioi c CS Cfis re iv 1red • ,1 ��c 5-1G Ii cA11 (�(fYll4- p(Weio o t'S 4 off Fe wcdcr w`��I ' I • A. .. DATE: V`i7'_'cr*7- SIGNA UREI!'r VII' ECG e OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE devrvsht Rev.3/92 DEPARTM-__T OF PLANNING/BUILDING ,,JBLIC WORKS ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: '*.rY1 1O CV:Co DATE CIRCULATED: 03/25/92 COMMENTS DUE: 04/07/92 APPLICATION NO: ECF;SA;V-150-90 PROPONENT: ED GONZALES PROJECT TITLE: ALEXANDER PLACE PROJECT MANAGER: LENORA BLAUMAN (6168) BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: THE APPLICANT IS SEEKING: (1) SITE PLAN APPROVAL FOR A 6-UNIT MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL COMPLEX; (2) A VARIANCE FROM SETBACK REQUIREMENTS FOR BURNETT AVENUE AND SMITHERS AVENUE. THIS PROJECT WAS INITIALLY SUBMITTED AND REVIEWED IN 1990; RECOMMENDATIONS FOR MODIFICATIONS WERE MADE AT THAT TIME. REVISIONS HAVE BEEN SUBMITTED AT THIS TIME -- COPIES OF NEW PLANS AND YOUR ORIGINAL COMMENTS ARE PROVIDED FOR YOUR INFORMATION. LOCATION: 633 BURNETT AVENUE SITE AREA: BUILDING AREA (gross'): IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS:, PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth 2. Air 3. Water X - 4. Plants • 5. Animals 6. Energy & Natural Resources 7. Environmental Health 8. Land & Shoreline Use 9. Housing 10. Aesthetics 11. Light & Glare 12. Recreation 13. Historic & Cultural Preservation 14. Transportation 15. Public Services 16. Utilities X. envrvsht Rev.12/81 COMMENTS: = 4 � /-‘x6"-n 14 "1(rye ti r� 1P- 4(,/ hill we 5 ce(or-37 5. 7 5 r. y 5 - /i eis 5dvThc?-4 ecdriI \ P S. • � I We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signa ure of/D/ector Autorized Representative Date envrvsht Rev.12/81 • DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET APPLICATION NO: ECF;SA;V-150-90 • • • PROPONENT: Ed Gonzales tl PROJECT TITLE: Alexander Place PROJECT MANAGER: Lenora Blauman (6168) BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The applicant is seeking: (1) site plan approval for a 6-unit multi-family residential complex; (2) a variance from setback requirements for. Burnett Avenue and'Smithers Avenue. This project was initially submitted and reviewed in 1990; recommendations for modifications were made at that time. Revisions have been submitted at this time°-- copies of new plans and your original comments are provided for your information. LOCATION: SEC: 17, 18, 19 & 20 TWNSHP: 23N RNG: 5E 633 Burnett Avenue • TO: • PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION SCHEDULED TAC DATE: 04/07/92 ENGINEERING SECTION TRAFFIC ENGINEERING SECTION UTILITIES ENGINEERING SECTION • FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION CONSTRUCTION FIELD SERVICES DEVELOPMENT PLANNING PLANNING & TECHNICAL SERVICES PARKS & RECREATION DIVISION OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE DEVELOPMENT PLANNING SECTION BY 5:00 PM ON APRIL 2, 1992. 5 ALEXANDER PLACE PAGE 2 i. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: , /r l--=T��i�-Pe-) APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED Vel'�f r - �/ _ 1/1 Q ' VAS/ ' d "Mit" intfeircrne t,10-ee ft1 t-od I�'L2 ((y4, 1q1w,� /� Dn97 $i '�pc ct�iM may / ,L twn fierewtte4 e 9ke (-4 / C( j„..06e ez4 5c,remczi4,4 r:"fri !he , ( 3, �6, /� �� . 0 e--'4 57"6 -'1 ki/c/47,-etet? 'o r of ee-4 t'Pr52'fii , -refrte*t,d, feexe-e/-e6f(r .icect/(P-7 6eq (fif6e-, / k a)ce- 1 7*/3 e4'91'' -f 14e&ee Gee. ez/eetpi 9 00/1-4 Ate .i74 )-14? /#64?-c "4 75/44-W/// Wly7 ,, /#fj-/.� eoez / / `�� Qs1/��` DATE: T ' / a SIGNATURE OF I T R A THORIZED REPRESENTATIVE devrvsht Rev.3/92 DEPARTME.-::' OF PLANNING/BUILDING/V.ALIC WORKS ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: SewerU#1v4.j tA DATE CIRCULATED: 03/25/92 COMMENTS DUE Cr in APPLICATION NO: ECF;SA;V-150-90AFR . 7 1092 PROPONENT: ED GONZALES PROJECT TITLE: ALEXANDER PLACE PROJECT MANAGER: LENORA BLAUMAN (6168) BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: THE APPLICANT IS SEEKING: (1) SITE PLAN APPROVAL FOR A 6-UNIT MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL COMPLEX; (2) A VARIANCE FROM SETBACK REQUIREMENTS FOR BURNETT AVENUE AND SMITHERS AVENUE. THIS PROJECT WAS INITIALLY SUBMITTED AND REVIEWED IN 1990; RECOMMENDATIONS FOR MODIFICATIONS WERE MADE AT THAT TIME. REVISIONS HAVE BEEN SUBMITTED AT THIS TIME -- COPIES OF NEW PLANS AND YOUR ORIGINAL COMMENTS ARE PROVIDED FOR YOUR INFORMATION. LOCATION: 633 BURNETT AVENUE SITE AREA: BUILDING AREA (gross): IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS: PROBABLE PROBABLE ' MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth 2. Air 3. Water &/ 4. Plants - 5. Animals 6. Energy & Natural Resources 7. Environmental Health 8. Land & Shoreline Use 9. Housing 10. Aesthetics 11. Light & Glare 12. Recreation 13. Historic & Cultural Preservation 14. Transportation 15. Public Services 16. Utilities V envrvsht Rev.12/91 d a {. - 1 COMMENTS: � - • OMMENTS: S r 1C i> h o ►1 tSe'wer tovrgr /rurvl 4ree - Sr file rs f h cj Soo-I ti ��)) /n �/ I �CCyI`Ic'11 (. II�C7rn.) Ql�Srt1 I IIC GOVe.Yl�1 1A/ 1<rne IS i'v19 k•,� r� / 411,1 "r 1�u 1 J er ! J�rov� I ��v� �v ( D v 1 - kW s t 5'Ever f,J-Icy, Cry/ se.ty. r mas and els- ht.) /�s �Ilow. Ar s�t„, l�r•� ��,,.�,- r►rAi►� no r-t' wl r ry 0 MC 1 fro Mpg " vte. rip, lry IA rider' Sv✓ii .1I Ay • .S' Gi'rd n✓rv1. • v Y7 d s Ttr / - o • • We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. - Signature of Di!-./or'or torized Representative Date envrvsht Rev.12/91 r � ' DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET APPLICATION NO: ECF;SA;V-150-90 PROPONENT: Ed Gonzales PROJECT TITLE: Alexander Place PROJECT MANAGER: Lenora Blauman (6168) BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The applicant is seeking: (1) site plan approval for a 6-unit multi-family residential complex; (2) a variance from setback requirements for Burnett Avenue and Smithers Avenue. This project was initially submitted and reviewed in 1990; recommendations for modifications were made at that time. Revisions have been submitted at this time -- copies of new plans and your original comments are provided for your information. LOCATION: SEC: 17, 18, 19 & 20 TWNSHP: 23N RNG: 5E 633 Burnett Avenue TO: . PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION SCHEDULED TAC DATE: 04/07/92 ENGINEERING SECTION TRAFFIC ENGINEERING SECTION • UTILITIES ENGINEERING SECTION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION CONSTRUCTION FIELD SERVICES DEVELOPMENT PLANNING PLANNING & TECHNICAL SERVICES PARKS & RECREATION DIVISION OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE DEVELOPMENT PLANNING SECTION BY 5:00 PM ON APRIL 2. 1992. ALEXANDER PLACE lS PAGE 2 1— _, REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: / /G / APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED i I I l --- • 'G li Curti- 511a II be. re_ vIrcG( 10 ✓ 5 ZL 2 ex).s�`fy_ .6 �� _ _ scwcri �� - ,. 8 '' on fn,, , IFe�s v. S., MET�o Ion"sue I, , ons Arc -ern'1;tte jn�0 e(I,S+~ c r e t-t �� Pr,Va�C GoslheG�1 P vr+T ho IJ De31 n or; San ►fair ' Se-'�J-� shoIl le Svch -Mal- f Fro►-►-r S s rwe-K -5 ,S-I 9 by r4 ii+ - r Fiver d ra wzr Poe. be d�r�Oka( • curt' Sa„,f ( s ���: �o direct- Flaw �o f��� par + i n eV ' r4-o re 0+ e A poly /, .n tnnd�✓vs ii.Jd K y pp P p Ita �ro'i �s/1a/I br do:, red in a <<nrda+ncc G i}t Sa��+ ��► �/r S�cve ' .)i pf ',Pia-troll S inda45 , \ Wl��, G��S . if � p -r • Fl / e.; + 1r pl(vl ihow,n1) t,11 ✓-1i1+i av+d ar/ ( 0' PPS+cr+n� �hu11 Svbw++'I !.� Crr^ t� ++ �+_ , ow .�. all C✓i7J$.1 rrf Si or+''') ni,y( S«n+levi Sek,ve.757 Z2 lc 3 al l : 2 5 egl-e ( S h ,J,. -tinA-1 in!n1ivivo1 SerQrq'1(oils or r mt./ Ir .ce__lweV and rva1'v - /0 / wall 10 wall I1 ✓ 4-r'(a�:r-1,htvk✓►�, -- - S7p"M c1.14 f&h)4,1- S l Wair 10 w4 IV 114Q-cfate P -e7. Pvi°44,y<2(/,. .(1 n c r 7 rA), , . --e..d ay," A /49- 7 e7tieze- °I(*edr-ra-el 1/--e€ 4.-/i), '' /27/-5 DATE: Y 7-72 SIGNAT RE OF TOR UTHORIZED REP�TATIVE devrvsht Rev.3/92 • • • GENERAL NOTES: • • a - 1. ALL EQUIPMENT AND ACCESSORIES SHALL BE STANDARD MANUFACTURED ITEMS AND THOSE COMING IN DIRECT CONTACT WITH SEWAGE • • SHALL BE SPECIFICALLY MANUFACTURED FOR z SEWAGE USE. J i 2. SEWAGE PUMPING SYSTEMS CONNECTING A SINGLE RESIDENCE TO THE MAIN GRAVITY LL a - SEWER LINE SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM CAPACITY ' o 0 r OF TEN GALLONS PER MINUTE (10 GPM) -I a 6' w WHEN PUMPING AGAINST THE REQUIRED TOTAL U u DYNAMIC HEAD (THD). • ' FINISH GRADE -- " _ . _ _ • 2% MIN. C.M 3. THE PUMP SUMP SHALL HAVE MINIMUM OF 4 _� _ - HOURS STORAGE CAPACITY AT THE ANTICIPATED O-6" SIDE ?" g FOR AVERAGE SEWAGE FLOW. (30 GALLONS). I SEWER 2" BENDS IF CF h4IN 4. THE ALARMS FOR HIGH WET WELL LEVEL AND FOR REQUIRED POWER FAILURE SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH THE 2" ADAPTER AS REQUIRED EMERGENCY POWER SUPPLY CONNECTION (CROUSE- HINDS ARK-TITE HEAVY DUTY CIRCUIT BREAKING FORCE MAIN CONNECTION:' DEVICE OR APPROVED EQUAL). OPTIONAL - COUPLING AS REQUIRED • - 6" x 4" REDUCER 5. THE STATION SHALL BE LOCATED AT THE ELEVATION - 4" NIPPLE THAT IS NOT SUBJECT TO THE 100 YEAR FLOOD - 4" x 4" x 4", TEST TEE FACE WAVE ACTION AND SHALL BE FULLY OPERATIONAL UP 6.PLUG 4" PLUG WITH 2" DURING 25 YEAR FLOOD ACTION. TAP •FOR FORCE MAIN 6. ELECTRICAL SYSTEM COMPONENTS SHALL COMPLY WITH THE NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE REQUIREMENTS C) FOR CLASS 1 DIVISION 1 LOCATIONS.-CONTROL °o ALARM (OPTIONAL) PANEL SHOULD BE SUITABLY PROTECTED FROM WEATHER AND VANDALISM. • PROTECTIVE 7. THERE SHALL BE NO PHYSICAL CONNECTION BETWEEN PROVISION FOR LOCKING ' SCREEN 5 ANY POTABLE WATER SUPPLY LINES AND THE SEWAGE LIFT STATION. • " r WATERTIGHT CONTROL PANEL .. (WITH OPTIONAL EMERGENCY 8. SUITABLE AND SAFE MEANS OF ACCESS SHOULD BE POWER CONNECTION) z PROVIDED FOR THE INSPECTION AND REMOVAL OF J E. PUMPING SYSTEMS FOR REPAIRS AND MAINTENANCE ' u i• WITHOUT DEWATERING THE WET WELL. 4'-� TO POWER SUPPLY I �-• 2"0 VENT PIPING AT THE OWNERS OPTION �' (PVC OR GALV. STEEL) RUBBER GASKET FOR AREA OVER COVERED WITHTATION CONCRETE MAY BE WATERTIGHT COVER BARK OR LAWN. //,. i�ii�i/ COVER �i/_sir_��ir - i�r.�i sr T' LOl• ••• CHAIN • • 1 . • •' - EXPLOSION PROOF t'4 x 4 ROUGH CUT POST IN CONCRETE BASE s POWER CABLE • JUNCTION BOX 'PRESSURE TREATED WOOD FLEXIBLE COUPLING- :_ ••• TO FIT Am = • 2" UNION .•• O - L ICI■'1 - ) -41/ INLET PIPE i 2" GATE VALVE ; GROUT FOR CONCRETE PIPE ASBESTOS COLLAR (RISING STEM) • FOR PLASTIC PIPE (TYPICAL ALL KNOCKOUTS) INFLUENT BAFFLE OR ALARM LEVEL • _ ._ ; INLET TRAP (CAST IRON) (OPTIONAL) I -� r-,2" CHECK VALVE f l f` LEVEL CONTROL-_�.• . • ' Z (SET MAX. 24" ABOVE • E SUBMERSIBLE PUMP PACIFIC PUMP CO. FLOOR LEVEL OR AS • •e 1S-PIP 500 OR EQUAL REQUIRED BY PUMP a MANUFACTURER) ::.::::.:: f :: 'f -� r-24" 0 CONCRETE PIPE OR PA CKAGE KAG E SUMBASIN- ,.. P S:`mow' TEEL 0_ R F '?iK °`r.> `:r'�:;5::'�::i: �: ;:.�� IB ERGLASS 6" MIN. !00.••��' o•; ° :o•.o� u: �p�g'.•;•oo,',"o Qa. : •„ ;¢.':4a' POURED CONCRETE HOPPER BOTTOM (45° SIDE SLOPES) •0..�• C' • o�o�.�'o 0 Q0• ' o• u o 0 . o•"�, ,r .o.• b' Oc.. oA.0.�,.. o•!:b41' i.'U. °'•_o••::.. •n:.ofPO.•.ou.Sk• :oON0 ? .00 •:a r.�.9:0. RAVEL BASE GRAVEL) "'iS• :o;:.cj•o.••�,:.ti,.,•o_•� •'.,•sPii^•°•�oe:•n.o2:6ii:o•o°•°rin_^e�4;.o°;O:a:4°.'Q�'eo'• 1..G (2" MINUS THIS IS A TYPICAL MINIMUM ARRANGEMENT ' ACCEPTABLE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS, OTHER ALTERNATES SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE DEPARTMENT . • - FOR. APPROVAL. PRIVATE SINGLE FAMILY LIFT STATION SEWER STANDARD DETAIL CITY OF RENTON ` NOT TO SCALE . • DEPARTMENT .OF PUBLIC WORKS MARCH 1980 . DEPARTM'et4T OF PLANNING/BU1LDINGi°r-;JBLIC WORKS ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET • REVIEWING DEPARTMENT:. 1.41t(Rti5._ DATE CIRCULATED: 03/25/92 COMMENTS DUE: 041IVISION RENTON APPLICATION NO: ECF;SA;V-150-90 APR 21992 . PROPONENT: ED GONZALES _D PROJECT TITLE: ALEXANDER PLACE PROJECT MANAGER: LENORA BLAUMAN (6168)� BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: THE APPLICANT IS SEEKING: (1) SITE PLAN 'APPROVAL FOR A 6-UNIT MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL COMPLEX;. (2) A VARIANCE FROM SETBACK REQUIREMENTS FOR BURNETT AVENUE AND SMITHERS AVENUE. THIS PROJECT WAS INITIALLY SUBMITTED AND REVIEWED IN 1990; RECOMMENDATIONS FOR MODIFICATIONS WERE MADE AT THAT TIME. REVISIONS HAVE BEEN- SUBMITTED AT THIS TIME -- COPIES OF NEW PLANS AND YOUR ORIGINAL COMMENTS ARE PROVIDED FOR-YOUR INFORMATION. LOCATION: 633 BURNETT AVENUE • • SITE AREA: BUILDING AREA (gross): • IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS: PROBABLE ' PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth 2. Air 3. Water 4. Plants' 5. Animals 6. Energy & Natural Resources 7. Environmental Health . • . ' • • • •- , • • 8. •Land & Shoreline Use 9. Housing 5 ... • 10. Aesthetics 1rw/rn i 11. Light & Glare nel/ . 12. Recreation • 13. Historic & Cultural Preservation • 14. Transportation ,15. Public Services , 16. Utilities • envrvsht - Rev.12191 COMMENTS: ` Thy plied �fl /,a d-ev.grot . 1//6H /✓Eti'67--y -T/-`�!�'i , SJDE,/7 6- wPI/a) co m/- ri / / 7 5-flr -R/if?7?'(e r-Nq d6/417 a l de vel?ri,vn cl f' dF .711607 75/0111 a 6 - 57) d. 7,3r. r6 . M-6 51 r Wine/z-e/ h/ G,--% J f co ae c5nd se f 66c4 G p-II 91o"?'W co C /fl c9fih(e w/ cz-r car cGivi' ria C/ (Go Gk'rn d - lj malt/ -orm444 r-(4-7can - 7140 i/c/e 2 T dui arc . (q . /w fO 7 CD h y ke,Gi&n ic/L-e C viet aa_ jam/ fL- v4Ariezy- c_o n Inc -o�h ova -� `w c� e�- I k - 602t 0/1, L 14 /,, t 7 -df '/ G� �t�2 0Jv��'�in f (-.1.. 57)/5-6076 ,-,4 GciG� c�ou C�CIou� dw�l- �i✓, fir, /9 &3 a vcd rtir -/�� � . t o v/ b-/c am b- 4f /2. / ae C?v ,�.�h titer Ue �l�i-� �� u� lid f��►, /fr " ' in-ea f�� /mod k.dC. dzlc1-(-2 ,1 . 77/Le 5vc W11147a,740 d to-GGt' /0-w /i e. 1444/t.-- 7- e Gvs c odt- Gawi wa f � 11,Le_ I 1 fo C-4) / f� 48 (o geliv am lid itersca/{ wig e-rrs1T- - dcoarka.of ,f44 oetifi-eolotionkh ic.,/lecee€440/a-i• 014-e-eir4-• o,/— r su % lit d4.0 . . Alar' t(Ji-' Mt �!a'��'"w# ✓sue ��7. f ��t We have revie tee this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is j needed to properly assess this proposal. , - Signature of Director or Autorized Representative Dat outtdkeW motnre. -flu &ado 40 /p0 /leo' env"sht �� •icafft '/L�2��f// ��I 4/// /111( Mid7411/14-( l/;9 / • Rev.12/91 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET • APPLICATION NO: ECF;SA;V-150-90 PROPONENT: Ed Gonzales PROJECT TITLE: Alexander Place PROJECT MANAGER: Lenora Blauman (6168) BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The applicant is seeking: (1) site plan approval for a 6-unit multi-family residential complex; (2) a variance from setback requirements for Burnett Avenue and Smithers Avenue: This project was initially submitted and reviewed in 1990; recommendations for modifications were made at that time. Revisions have been submitted at this time -- copies of new plans and your original comments are provided for your information. LOCATION: SEC: 17, 18, 19 & 20 TWNSHP: 23N RNG: 5E 633 Burnett Avenue TO: PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION SCHEDULED TAC DATE: 04/07/92 ENGINEERING SECTION TRAFFIC ENGINEERING SECTION UTILITIES ENGINEERING SECTION • FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION CONSTRUCTION FIELD SERVICES DEVELOPMENT PLANNING PLANNING & TECHNICAL SERVICES PARKS & RECREATION DIVISION OTHERS:. COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE DEVELOPMENT PLANNING SECTION BY 5:00 PM ON APRIL 2, 1992. ALEXANDER PLACE PAGE 2 REVIEWIN DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED DATE:#Z SIGNATURE OF D RECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE devrvsht Rev.3/92 r—• K., DEPARTME.-: OF PLANNING/BUILDING/ BLIC WORKS ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEEF�o b/v/s,oN . •__ 11/A ^iron, REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: C 241,99 DATE CIRCULATED: 03/25/92 COMMENTS DUEel : „ems . APPLICATION NO: ECF;SA;V-150-90 PROPONENT: ED GONZALES PROJECT TITLE: ALEXANDER PLACE PROJECT MANAGER: LENORA BLAUMAN (6168) BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: THE APPLICANT IS SEEKING: (1) SITE PLAN APPROVAL FOR A 6-UNIT MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL COMPLEX; (2) A VARIANCE FROM SETBACK REQUIREMENTS FOR BURNETT AVENUE AND SMITHERS AVENUE. THIS PROJECT WAS INITIALLY SUBMITTED AND REVIEWED IN 1990; RECOMMENDATIONS FOR MODIFICATIONS WERE MADE AT THAT TIME. REVISIONS HAVE BEEN SUBMITTED AT THIS TIME -- COPIES OF NEW PLANS AND YOUR ORIGINAL COMMENTS ARE PROVIDED FOR YOUR INFORMATION. LOCATION: 633 BURNETT AVENUE SITE AREA: BUILDING AREA (gross): IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS: PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE • MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPART/ IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth v 2. Air 3. Water 4. Plants 5. Animals 6. Energy & Natural Resources 7. Environmental Health 8. Land & Shoreline Use / 9. Housing 10. Aesthetics / 11. Light & Glare l/ 12. Recreation 13. Historic & Cultural Preservation 14. Transportation 15. Public Services 16. Utilities envrvsht Rev.12/91 COMMENTS: ',/f117 We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. - /7;2' Signature of Director or Auto ' d Representative Date erwrvaht Rev.12/91 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET 'APPLICATION NO: ECF;SA;V-150-90 PROPONENT: Ed Gonzales PROJECT TITLE: Alexander Place PROJECT MANAGER: Lenora Blauman (6168) BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The applicant is seeking: (1) site plan approval for a 6-unit multi-family residential complex; (2) a variance from setback requirements for Burnett Avenue and Smithers Avenue. This project Was initially submitted and reviewed in.1990; recommendations for modifications were made at that time. Revisions have been submitted at this time -- copies of new plans and your original comments are provided for your information. LOCATION: SEC: 17, 18, 19 & 20 TWNSHP: 23N RNG: 5E 633 Burnett Avenue TO: PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION SCHEDULED TAC DATE: 04/07/92 ENGINEERING SECTION • TRAFFIC ENGINEERING SECTION UTILITIES ENGINEERING SECTION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION CONSTRUCTION FIELD SERVICES DEVELOPMENT PLANNING PLANNING & TECHNICAL SERVICES PARKS & RECREATION DIVISION OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE DEVELOPMENT PLANNING SECTION BY 5:00 PM ON APRIL 2, 1992. ALEXANDER PLACE PAGE 2 } REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: APPROVED v APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED /6"2"'" (cale/"Ie‘, a' V G1/44 ge ei .kt/t// 14.44 4,7 • r DATE: SIGNATURE OF DIRE TOR 0 THORIZED REPRESENTATIVE devrvsht Rev.3/92 �j "ROPERTY MANAGEMENT FEE REVIEW RI'DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ❑ PLAN REVIEW ROUTING SLIP L1) ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET Ci OTHER APPLICANT: `- '‘1,--/ JOB ADDRESS: S3 — (. - NATURE OF WORK: Zj t-e44L /- DATE RECEIVED BY RECEIVED FROM COMMENTS DUE WO# PROPERTY MGMT.PE y Q• / !/9, GREEN # E FEES APPLIED ` El NEED MORE INFORMATION Cl LEGAL DESCRIPTION Q NOT APPROVED FOR J CI FRONT FOOTAGE SQUARE FOOTAGE APPLICATION OF FEES eie -l-L 74rili El VICINITY MAP El OTHER It is the intent of this development fee analysis to put the developer/owner on notice,that the fees quoted below will apply to the subject site upon development of the property. All quoted fees are due and payable at the time the construction permit is issued to install the on-site and off-site improvements (i.e. underground utilities, street improvements, etc.) PRIVATE DEVELOPER HELD PROJECT COST LATECOMER LATECOMER AGREEMENT NO. PER. FIG. FEE WATER SEWER OTHER O-- SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT `` FTG. r SAD FEE WATER j. d� 1d f 71.4,frAti,‘/7 SEWER KdA;Pv OTHER SPE CIAL UTILITY CONNECTION CHARGE-WATER UNITS SUCC FEE I Single family residential dwelling unit$940/lot x Apartment, Condo, each multiplex unit$545/ea.unit x L409, a7o. OD Commercial/Industrial$.126/sq.ft. of property x (not less than $940.00) SPECIAL UTILITY CONNECTION CHARGE-SEWER UNITS SUCC FEE Single family residential dwelling unit$470/lot x Apartment, Condo, each multiplex unit$270/ea.unit x LQ r 11 6a D. DO Commercial/Industrial$.063/sq.ft. of property x (not less than $470.00) TOTAL: $ 4, 7t. -< I gy0. 00 �' ko The above quoted fees do NOT include inspection fees,side sewer permits, r/w per it fees or a cost of water meter i XI ci.Q. 119 * 180 3 O S- g o lY/ , a 0 .1__1..e.c..4.4...1... )7.,( . 1.J--- 3///91 Signature of Director or Authorized Repre ntatle DATE r/tv/fi.r/10601//I f!I/►Y ' • DEPARTMI 0,:ir OF PLANNING/BUILDING). :,BLIC WORKS ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Poke-- PLANN COMMENTS DUE: O4/6 � DNISoaV DATE CIRCULATED: 03/25/92 APPLICATION NO: CF;SA;V-150-90 "�" 1 1992 PROPONENT: ED GONZALES " 1"‘17ti VED PROJECT TITLE: ALEXANDER PLACE PROJECT MANAGER: LENORA BLAUMAN, (6168) (� BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: THE APPLICANT IS SEEKING: (1) SITE PLAN APPROVAL FOR A 6-UNIT MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL COMPLEX; (2) . A VARIANCE FROM. SETBACK REQUIREMENTS FOR BURNETT AVENUE AND SMITHERS AVENUE. THIS PROJECT WAS INITIALLY SUBMITTED AND REVIEWED IN 1990; RECOMMENDATIONS FOR MODIFICATIONS WERE MADE AT THAT TIME. REVISIONS HAVE BEEN SUBMITTED AT THIS TIME -- COPIES OF NEW PLANS AND YOUR ORIGINAL COMMENTS ARE PROVIDED FOR YOUR INFORMATION. LOCATION: 633 BURNETT AVENUE SITE AREA: BUILDING AREA (gross): IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS: PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR ' MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth 2. Air 3. Water 4. Plants 5. Animals 6. Energy & Natural Resources 7. Environmental Health 8. Land & Shoreline Use 9. Housing • 10. Aesthetics 11. Light & Glare 12. Recreation 13. Historic & Cultural Preservation 14. Transportation - - 15. Public Services 16. Utilities envrvsht Rev.12/91 COMMENTS: • eck smtack.i fru& Stot/u1 (A/ikpa_e/c- We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. - tAw-y1�(v A- &4Oi 2 Signature of Director or Autorized Representative Date envrvsht Rev.12/91 . 0 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET APPLICATION NO: ECF;SA;V-150-90 PROPONENT: Ed Gonzales PROJECT TITLE: Alexander Place PROJECT MANAGER: Lenora Blauman (6168) BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The applicant is seeking: (1) site plan approval for a 6-unit multi-family residential complex; (2) a variance from setback requirements for Burnett Avenue and Smithers Avenue. This project was initially submitted and reviewed in 1990; recommendations for modifications were made at that time. Revisions have been submitted at this time -- copies of new plans and your original comments are provided for your information. LOCATION: SEC: 17, 18, 19 & 20 TWNSHP: 23N RNG: 5E 633 Burnett Avenue TO: PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION SCHEDULED TAC DATE: 04/07/92 ENGINEERING SECTION TRAFFIC ENGINEERING SECTION UTILITIES ENGINEERING SECTION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION - CONSTRUCTION FIELD SERVICES • DEVELOPMENT PLANNING PLANNING & TECHNICAL SERVICES PARKS & RECREATION DIVISION OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE DEVELOPMENT PLANNING SECTION BY 5:00 PM ON APRIL 2, 1992. ALEXANDER PLACE PAGE 2 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: -APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS ROT APPROVED Ir DATE: SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR'UTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE devrvsht Rev.3/92 DEPARTML::1" OF PLANNING/BUILDING/.-- BLIC WORKS'14Aw%N� cm'opRoNN ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET Apo, 2 / 1992 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: T:ix.r4 ' ` (/q2 ' I=�/ DATE CIRCULATED: 03/25/92 COMMENTS D E: 4/O7/9 APPLICATION NO: ECF;SA;V-150-90 PROPONENT: ED GONZALES PARKS& RECRE4�F®� PROJECT TITLE: ALEXANDER PLACE PROJECT MANAGER: LENORA BLAUMAN (6168) BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: THE APPLICANT IS SEEKING: (1) SITE PLAN APPROVAL FOR A 6-UNIT MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL COMPLEX; (2) A VARIANCE FROM SETBACK REQUIREMENTS FOR BURNETT AVENUE AND SMITHERS AVENUE. THIS PROJECT WAS INITIALLY SUBMITTED AND REVIEWED IN 1990; RECOMMENDATIONS FOR MODIFICATIONS WERE MADE AT THAT TIME. REVISIONS HAVE BEEN SUBMITTED AT THIS TIME -- COPIES OF NEW PLANS AND YOUR ORIGINAL COMMENTS ARE PROVIDED FOR YOUR INFORMATION. • LOCATION: 633 BURNETT AVENUE SITE AREA: BUILDING AREA (gross): IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS: PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR • MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth 2. Air V 3. ; Water - 4. Plants lY - . . - -• •--5. Animals 6. Energy & Natural Resources V - 7. Environmental Health lY _ 8. Land & Shoreline Use _ - 9. Housing "/ - --• - - 10. Aesthetics V 11. Light & Glare V 12. Recreation 13. Historic & Cultural Preservation 14. Transportation - 15. Public Services 16. Utilities V envrvsht Rev.12/91 COMMENTS: 4W, XXeC, . I ' I We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. tra-C&P //y Signature of Director or Autorized Representative Date envrvsht Rev.12/91 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET APPLICATION NO: ECF;SA;V-150-90 g y D PROPONENT: Ed Gonzales ifrAR 6 1992 PROJECT TITLE: Alexander Place LPARKS&RECREATB Ogg PROJECT MANAGER: Lenora Blauman (6168) BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The applicant is seeking: (1) site plan approval for a 6-unit multi-family residential complex; (2) a variance from setback requirements for Burnett Avenue and Smithers Avenue. This project was initially submitted and reviewed in 1990; recommendations for modifications were made at that time. Revisions have been submitted at this time -- copies of new plans and your original comments are provided for your information. LOCATION: SEC: 17, 18, 19 & 20 TWNSHP: 23N RNG: 5E 633 Burnett Avenue TO: PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION SCHEDULED TAC DATE: 04/07/92 ENGINEERING SECTION TRAFFIC ENGINEERING SECTION UTILITIES ENGINEERING SECTION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION CONSTRUCTION FIELD SERVICES - DEVELOPMENT PLANNING A LPit PLANNIN •TECHNICAL VICES •// y. � '� n7!//k. c "%CXif-t cr // '2 PARKS & RFC-RSA ON DIVISION �Z? Pam / � - OTHERS: ` (61 COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE DEVELOPMENT PLANNING SECTION BY 5:00 PM ON APRIL 2, 1992. ALEXANDER PLACE PAGE 2 REVIEWING'.DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: fr- if,87-v /�J (/l/"Z�717-.� k/ APPROVED • V APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED kt//j-I-C;t_ rd;L ( Crra/N- -S (:i4434) sef ' .°11Lk &te-a 41/e /IdC• 1/1/(Pre Itair/k/ etaln_OZZ4a--- /42e1 C7-‘, (6)47/A-e-,& • • 1//>I DATE: .171/4/ Z SIGNATURE O.F_-43FREC'TO OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE devrvsht Rev.3/92 r 1 7 DEPARTME.�.} OF PLANNING/BUILDING%:JBNG LIC WORKS P LANNI CITY OF RDIVISION ENFFENTON ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET MAR 2. 4'.1992 NEGIVED REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: C19V1s f`Yv�c- ova 5ejI((p RE DATE CIRCULATED: 03/25/92 • COMMENTS DUE: O4/0gI�EEON IVF APPLICATION NO: ECF;SA;V-150-90 •• MAR 2 5 1992 PROPONENT: ED GONZALES L$UILDING DIVISION PROJECT TITLE: ALEXANDER PLACE PROJECT MANAGER: LENORA BLAUMAN (6168) BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: THE APPLICANT IS SEEKING: (1) SITE PLAN APPROVAL FOR A 6-UNIT MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL COMPLEX; (2) A VARIANCE FROM SETBACK REQUIREMENTS FOR BURNETT AVENUE AND SMITHERS AVENUE. THIS PROJECT WAS INITIALLY SUBMITTED AND REVIEWED IN 1990; RECOMMENDATIONS FOR MODIFICATIONS WERE MADE AT THAT TIME. REVISIONS HAVE BEEN SUBMITTED AT THIS TIME -- COPIES OF NEW PLANS AND YOUR ORIGINAL COMMENTS ARE PROVIDED FOR YOUR INFORMATION. • LOCATION: 633 BURNETT AVENUE SITE AREA: BUILDING AREA (gross): IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS: PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR , INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth 2. Air 3. Water 4. Plants • 5. Animals 6. Energy & Natural Resources 7. Environmental Health 8. Land & Shoreline Use 9. Housing - 10. Aesthetics 11. Light & Glare 12. Recreation ' 13. Historic & Cultural Preservation 14. Transportation 15. Public Services 16. Utilities • envrvsht Rev.12/91 COMMENTS: • I � I " I I I r( I � I 1 I f I I ' We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signs ure of Director or Autorized Representative Date envrvsht Hev.12l91 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET APPLICATION NO: ECF;SA;V-150-90 PROPONENT: Ed Gonzales PROJECT TITLE: Alexander Place PROJECT MANAGER: Lenora Blauman (6168) BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The applicant is seeking: (1) site plan approval for a 6-unit multi-family residential complex; (2) a variance from setback requirements for Burnett Avenue and Smithers Avenue. This project was initially submitted and reviewed in 1990; recommendations for modifications were made at that time. Revisions have been submitted at this time -- copies of new plans and.your original comments are provided for your information. LOCATION: SEC: 17, 18, 19 & 20 TWNSHP: 23N RNG: 5E 633 Burnett Avenue TO: PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION SCHEDULED TAC DATE: 04/07/92 ENGINEERING SECTION TRAFFIC ENGINEERING SECTION UTILITIES ENGINEERING SECTION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT DEVEMENT SERVICES DIVISION CONSTRUCTION FIELD SERVICES DEVELOPMENT PLANNING PLANNING & TECHNICAL SERVICES PARKS & RECREATION DIVISION OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE DEVELOPMENT PLANNING SECTION BY 5:00 PM ON APRIL 2, 1992. . \\ , ALEXANDER PLACE PAGE 2 i Y4 REVIEW! !DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: APPROVED - APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED /(1. c _ DATE: SIGNA URE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE devrvsht Rev.3/92 DEPARTML. OF PLANNING/BUILDING/'.'- 'BLIC WO` SON FIRE DEPT. FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET MAR 2 6 1992 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: "t'\V'C- 9=e ECRIED crry OF RENTON . DATE CIRCULATED: 03/25/92 COMMENTS DUE: 04/07/92 l ' 2 7 1992 APPLICATION NO: ECF;SA;V-150-90 1g=tz;e1 v 1ED PROPONENT: ED GONZALES PROJECT TITLE: ALEXANDER PLACE PROJECT MANAGER: LENORA BLAUMAN (6168) BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: THE APPLICANT IS SEEKING: (1) SITE PLAN APPROVAL FOR A 6-UNIT MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL COMPLEX; (2) A VARIANCE FROM SETBACK REQUIREMENTS FOR BURNETT AVENUE AND SMITHERS AVENUE. THIS PROJECT,WAS INITIALLY SUBMITTED AND REVIEWED IN 1990; RECOMMENDATIONS FOR MODIFICATIONS WERE MADE AT THAT TIME. REVISIONS HAVE BEEN SUBMITTED AT THIS TIME -- COPIES OF NEW PLANS AND YOUR ORIGINAL COMMENTS ARE PROVIDED FOR YOUR INFORMATION. LOCATION: 633 BURNETT AVENUE SITE AREA: BUILDING AREA (gross): IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS: PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth 2. Air 3. Water 4. Plants 5. Animals 6. Energy & Natural Resources 7. Environmental Health 8. Land & Shoreline Use 9. Housing 10. Aesthetics 11. Light & Glare 12. Recreation 13. Historic & Cultural Preservation 14. Transportation 15. Public Services 16. Utilities envrvsht Rev.12/91 r9 si{Cd 11M E VTS°. :' 1� /JI ., .. ..,.Y�yd?:.�i1 ,,, i�ajiil'f:�i�-E�'S, '��y�-, AA /y'jA/l//A//'" / �o I� � /0® /' e g r -.,Lr",..` S ., I I 4,,-,,,,,f g.71 4M:::1;:... \..., We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. - _ - ' Li , ..., . . 3/103-- lir Signature m ector or Autori 'epresentative Date envrvsht Rev.12/91 " DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET APPLICATION NO: ECF;SA;V-1 50-90 PROPONENT: Ed Gonzales 6;8';s:'.` pROJ.ECT�;TITLE;jIAlezan;der Place °; :y ! ; y rr, ;4;,r= •,.fsiis ?',, L!.., , ;) i+ f:.df;_ `. r` > zt:''s r PROJECT MANAGER: Lenora Blauman (6168) ` 7_�-.'st l`rr^ -,•.? S, - it,'� -,3, ±Y•e .1;; r.rt 2`,�.•�i7f4 ,,,. �iY`,.i°'. _� !'�' .>.a'•'t'�;—�-�c - "C,,, BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:-The-applicant-is seeking: (i1') site:planiapproval'for a.6-uriit,•multi-family i ` ----residential complex;-(2).a .v.arianceNfrom setback.requirements for..Burnett Avenue,and Smithers:Avenue. This project was initially submi`tted'and reviewed in'19• 90;-recommendations-for modifications-were'made if • that time. Revisions have been submitted at this time -- copies of new plans and your original':comments- JP .rare_,provided'for.your°information:,.... . +%•'l 3.. _.,1 ,..r..m...,,.....,_.,....._..._•_-_.. ,.._..-..... _ .. �'. . . t ,:�,iR „t8'+i ;-', tirlpf �d,:..7 i9c e,;�••,r . LOCATION: SEC: 17, 18, 19 & 20 TWNSHP: 23N ,RNG: °.c .. .... . ,. ! ?:. ,.! _ :.., ;, ,. . ,, 633!Burnett Avenue_• :,,;<; ," tt .:.1 -;k.; :'Y }`0 r t w tf t�:,yf tg,pb ;..,.. . _ v.! r. ,an.yr." d>.,- .. ,.•i C:; 'k TE: PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION • SCHEDULED TAC-DA ''04107192'" ENGINEERING SECTION TRAFFIC ENGINEERING SECTION UTILITIES ENGINEERING SECTION y FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION • CONSTRUCTION FIELD SERVICES DEVELOPMENT PLANNING PLANNING & TECHNICAL SERVICES PARKS & RECREATION DIVISION OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE DEVELOPMENT PLANNING SECTION BY 5:00 PM ON APRIL 2, 1992. ALEXANDER PLACE PAGE 2 .b REVIEWING; DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: C�ci1..R„ ��'(/f?�j1 Tr, • APPROVED k APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED Any development and/or construction shall comply with current Fire and Building Codes and Ordi- nances. A second means of approved access is required. Fire Department access roads/lanes shall be paved minimum width 20'; minimum height= 13 6. . Yes No OK. Preliminary fire flow alculations show a fire flow of /5dr0 Q PM is required. hydrants with a minimum flow of /OOP gpm each is required. Primary hydrant is required to be within / O feet of the structure. ..._..�.. feet of the Secondary hydrants are required to be within 306 structure. An approved automatic sprinkler system is required to protect the total structure. Yes 2L.. No._ All fire department access roads are to be paved and installed prior to constructio'Yes X No All fire hydrants are required to be installed and approved prior to construction. Yes X No l DATE: S SIGNATURE OF DIRECT, cR AUTHORIZED RESENTATIVE devrvsht Rev.3/92 15D -90 �! b CITE OF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works Department Earl Clymer, Mayor Lynn Guttman,Administrator March 26, 1991 E. M. Gonzalez 11015 142nd Avenue S.E. Renton, Washington 98056 RE: Alexander Six-flex; Williams Avenue Multi-Family Complex Dear Mr. Gonzalez: I am writing to follow-up on our meetings of March 19, 1991 concerning the above-referenced projects. 1) Alexander Six-Plex As we agreed at our conference, Jeff Spring will be modifying design plans for this development to locate the access on Smithers Avenue, based upon requirements established by the Transportations Systems Division and the Public Works Department. This modification will also necessitate some changes to the design of the parking garage, screening plans and landscaping plans. 2) Williams Avenue Multi-Family Complex As we agreed at our conference, GMS will be modifying design plans for this development to redesign parking and enhance landscaping through: 1) increased plantings on the south boundary; 2) the addition of a berm and increased plantings within that berm on the western boundary. For your benefit,we would suggest that new materials be provided at your earliest convenience, as the City's Planning Commission and the City Council are considering placing a moratorium on new multi-family development in both the R-3 and the R-4 zones in the near future. Processing of these applications will resume as soon as the above referenced revisions are submitted. If you have questions or would like additional information, please contact me at 235-2550. Sincerely, Lenora Blauman Project Manager cc: Rick Gulstrom, Sylvia Alexander GMS Architects 3826 So. 288th Street Auburn,Washington 98001 Jeff Spring DDI Architects 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING/BUILDING/PUINI/ORKS ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET p c�' Biro REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: 7011P�1c- opRF , , Citf DATE CIRCULATED: 2/15/91 COMMENTS DUE: 3 1� /91 Ilk 7 9 ECF-150-90 ite 0 APPLICATION NO(S): SA;V-150-90 PROPONENT: Ed Gonzales PROJECT TITLE: Alexander Place' BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant Is seeking: (1) site plan approval for a 6-unit multi-family residential complex; (2) a variance from setback requirements for Burnett Avenue, and (3) a variance from setback requirements for Smithers Avenue. LOCATION: 633 Burnett Avenue SITE AREA: 9100 sf BUILDING AREA(gross): IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS: PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth 2. Air 3. Water 4. Plants 5. Animals 6. Energy&Natural Resources 7. Environmental Health 8. Land &Shoreline Use 9. Housing 10. Aesthetics 11. Light&Glare 12. Recreation 13. Historic&Cultural Preservation 14. Transportation 15. Public Services 16. Utilities P1t cC— COMMENTS: ,; __y.CA— [-5 vK(j_LcatL 2� � sI C cui()'i4rX VQ.(4uu Ce �L vaAca,o_(-Qs We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. 0eAi(-(AA/-73 1,tyl7f,LAAJ-- no\ Signature of Director or Authorized Repres ntative Date Rev.6/88 envrvsht - I . M DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF-150-90 APPLICATION NO(S).: SA;V-150-90 PROPONENT: Ed Gonzales PROJECT TITLE: Alexander Place BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant is seeking: (1) site plan approval for a 6-unit multi-family residential complex; (2) a variance from setback requirements for Burnett Avenue, and (3) a variance from setback requirements for Smithers Avenue. LOCATION: SEC: 17, 18, 19&20 TWNSHP:23N RNG:5E 633 Burnett Avenue TO: PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION SCHEDULED TAC DATE: 3/8/91 ENGINEERING SECTION TRAFFIC ENG. SECTION UTILITIES ENG. SECTION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION CONSTRUCTION FIELD SERVICES DEVELOPMENT PLANNING PLANNING &TECHNICAL SERVICES PARKS AND RECREATION DIVISION OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5:00 P.M. ON MARCH 1, 1991. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED DATE: CSC.CI, SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV.5/90 dent DEPARTMtn T OF PLANNING/BUILDING/PU .'C WORKS ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET o�yoHoo�l. 194 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: � V DATE CIRCULATED: 2/15/91 COMMENTS DUE: 3/1/9 � ECF-150-90 q_.,.r APPLICATION NO(S): SA;V-150-90 • PROPONENT: Ed Gonzales j Ft' PROJECT TITLE: Alexander Place 1_PARKS 6_ R CREATION BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant is seeking: (1) site plan approval for a 6-unit mu tt- mily residential complex; (2) a variance from setback requirements for Burnett Avenue, and (3) a variance from setback requirements for Smithers Avenue. LOCATION: 633 Burnett Avenue SITE AREA: 9100 sf BUILDING AREA(gross): IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS: PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth 2. Air 3. Water 4. Plants 5. Animals 6. Energy&Natural Resources 7. Environmental Health 8. Land &Shoreline Use 9. Housing 10. Aesthetics 11. Light&Glare 12. Recreation 13. Historic&Cultural Preservation 14. Transportation 15. Public Services 16. Utilities COMMENTS: • / -A-A �, 7�-�- �.-,.�✓� , ram - o������/�- er7Y47"o 4e44,' ter We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. 3 / y/ --S , re of Director or Authorized Representative Date Rev.6/88 envrvsht DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF-150-90 APPLICATION NO(S).: SA;V-150-90 PROPONENT: Ed Gonzales PROJECT TITLE: Alexander Place BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant is seeking: (1) site plan approval for a 6-unit multi-family residential complex; (2) a variance from setback requirements for Burnett Avenue, and (3) a variance from setback requirements for Smithers Avenue. LOCATION: SEC: 17, 18, 19&20 TWNSHP:23N RNG:5E 633 Burnett Avenue TO: PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION SCHEDULED TAC DATE: 3/8/91 ENGINEERING SECTION TRAFFIC ENG. SECTION UTILITIES ENG. SECTION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION CONSTRUCTION FIELD SERVICES DEVELOPMENT PLANNING PLANNING &TECHNICAL SERVICES L PARKS AND RECREATION DIVISION. OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5:00 P.M. ON MARCH 1, 1991. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: APPROVED 5<APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED • DATE: 5 ( SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV.5/90 dev,vsht DEPARTML..f OF PLANNING/BUILDING/PUbciS WORKS ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET o, y� 1 L oti� REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: ��,y Ork11U14 ifs 94%% DATE CIRCULATED: 2/15/91 COMMENTS DUE: 3/1/91 C� . 9.#j °4 `99, ECF-150-90 • APPLICATION NO(S):, SA;V 150-90 PROPONENT: Ed Gonzales PROJECT TITLE: Alexander Place BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant is seeking: (1) site plan approval for a 6-unit multi-family residential complex; (2) a variance from setback requirements for Burnett Avenue, and (3) a variance from setback requirements for Smithers Avenue. LOCATION: 633 Burnett Avenue SITE AREA: 9100 sf BUILDING AREA(gross): IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS: PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth 2. Air 3. Water '4. Plants 5. Animals 6. Energy&Natural Resources 7. Environmental Health 8. Land&Shoreline Use 9. Housing 10. Aesthetics 11. Light&Glare 12. Recreation 13. Historic&Cultural Preservation 14. Transportation 15. Public Services 16. Utilities COMMENTS: 15, We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas In which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. , 2". � / /9'9/ Signature of Director or Authorized Representative' Date f Rev.6/88 • envrvsht REVIEW COMMENTS 633 BURNETT AVE SOUTH PROPOSED 6-PLEX MARCH 1, 1991 1. Burnett Ave S.,near north property line -- Puget power's pole anchor is located in the sidewalk and is a hazard to pedestrians and future occupants. Initiate relocation of anchor to back of sidewalk with Puget Sound Power & Light Company. Show relocation on sidewalk plan. 2. Burnett Ave S.& S.7th St. -- Curb radius to be 20'. Provide curb and sidewalk plan. 3. S. 7th St. -- A five foot sidewalk and fout4 foot planter strip required the length of the property frontage. Nine feet of right-of-way dedication is required to install the sidewalk and planter strip. A sidewalk easement may be provided in lieu of dedication of right-of- way. 4. The drive way as proposed on S. 7th St. is positioned in a hazardous location between two intersections and also less then 50 feet from either intersection. The driveway is to be located off €mithers Ave S. a minimum of 50 feet from the intersection, but preferably 5-feet from the north property line. 5. Smithers Ave S. -- Sidewalk is in bad repair and required to be replaced. Show provision on sidewalk drawing. City standards are to be shown on sidewalk drawings. - 910EM033 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF-150-90 APPLICATION NO(S).: SA;V-150-90 PROPONENT: Ed Gonzales PROJECT TITLE: Alexander Place BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant Is seeking: (1) site plan approval for a 6-unit multi-family residential complex; (2) a variance from setback requirements for Burnett Avenue, and (3) a variance from setback requirements for Smithers Avenue. LOCATION: SEC: 17, 18, 19&20 TWNSHP:23N RNG:5E 633 Burnett Avenue TO: PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION SCHEDULED TAC DATE: 3/8/91 ENGINEERING SECTION TRAFFIC ENG. SECTION UTILITIES ENG. SECTION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION CONSTRUCTION FIELD SERVICES DEVELOPMENT PLANNING PLANNING&TECHNICAL SERVICES PARKS AND RECREATION DIVISION OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5:00 P.M. ON MARCH 1, 1991. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: T.v-a,.,SV©r a� �� ,�P ()(c,,-, APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS X NOT APPROVED }} w—a41_,\A--- a:1)1; g^ ___ � DATE: as /?, SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR A HORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV.5/90 devrvsht DEPARTME.iT OF PLANNING/BUILDING/PUoi-.0 WORKS ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET rZWIVG 5'0 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: SiCArn 5 799 DATE CIRCULATED: 2/15/91 COMMENTS DUE: 3/1/9 ' i ECF-150-90 APPLICATION NO(S): SA;V-150-90 PROPONENT: Ed Gonzales • PROJECT TITLE: Alexander Place BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant Is seeking: (1) site plan approval for a 6-unit multi-family residential complex; (2) a variance from setback requirements for Burnett Avenue, and (3) a variance from s'etback requirements for Smithers Avenue. ti,.. . LOCATION: 633 Burnett Avenue SITE AREA: 9100 sf BUILDING AREA(gross): IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS: PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE • MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth 2. Air 3. Water 4. Plants 5. Animals 6. Energy&Natural Resources 7. Environmental Health 8. Land&Shoreline Use 9. Housing 10. Aesthetics 11. Light&Glare 12. Recreation 13. Historic&Cultural Preservation 14. Transportation 15. Public Services 16. Utilities COMMENTS: -, 14-e. i5 in So 1`I1 1-on f)rr Bats E 166st ,i cc,-,foi 115 rki`r�dj ±J- 4 - is gcce ' l� 6 ' ' Works 5d flat CO. ms _ 6 We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas In which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date Rev.6/88 enmsht DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF-150-90 APPLICATION NO(S).: SA;V-150-90 PROPONENT: Ed Gonzales PROJECT TITLE: Alexander Place BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant is seeking: (1) site plan approval for a 6-unit multi-family residential complex; (2) a variance from setback requirements for Burnett Avenue, and (3) a variance from setback requirements for Smithers Avenue. LOCATION: SEC: 17, 18, 19&20 TWNSHP:23N RNG:5E 633 Burnett Avenue TO: PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION SCHEDULED TAC DATE: 3/8/91 ENGINEERING SECTION TRAFFIC ENG. SECTION UTILITIES ENG. SECTION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION CONSTRUCTION FIELD SERVICES DEVELOPMENT PLANNING PLANNING &TECHNICAL SERVICES PARKS AND RECREATION DIVISION OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5:00 P.M. ON MARCH 1, 1991. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: IU(YI " - APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED — D4A.I UovUoS Onaaty//.5IS r jeg I/l3•^e,� 4r pi, 1a ) W►;le de wn5fea141 _J a 14 lM(1- Ali i(iiC, I v�G�Gf S y S N'1 �-o / hand 1e, by ( S�Gf o✓loI (ly h Wa )-tr Ile 1 ror rellose4 anti/, ci l'od✓t d )e 4 rev ki - ;1 rem ot� vT( fi�l�! f/ Cr �� ���a� 5i-RmeardA- ail 1 4 4, Z.e �e�a 1" 09 _,,deevyi DATE: 3/1/qI SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV.5/90 dev,vshl DEPARTMcivT OF PLANNING/BUILDING/PU.0 WORKS ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET izt4AonYo�R�4vos/o,y oN REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: 1,L) U4 t R 0 5499 DATE CIRCULATED: 2/15/91 COMMENTS DUE: 3/1/91 kt�®� ECF-150-90 APPLICATION NO(S): SA;V-150-90 PROPONENT: Ed Gonzales PROJECT TITLE: Alexander Place BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant is seeking: (1) site plan approval for a 6-unit multi-family residential complex; (2) a variance from setback requirements for Burnett Avenue, and (3) a variance from setback requirements for Smithers Avenue. LOCATION: 633 Burnett Avenue SITE AREA: 9100 sf BUILDING AREA(gross): IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS: PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth 2. Air 3. Water 4. Plants 5. Animals • 6. Energy&Natural Resources 7. Environmental Health 8. Land &Shoreline Use 9. Housing 10. Aesthetics 11. Light&Glare 12. Recreation 13. Historic&Cultural Preservation 14. Transportation 15. Public Services 16. Utilities COMMENTS: N SVf-e- )5 h 0 iyi Sewer roo(e fo(r0rvl nreo , 5rfc is in ` Soo±h PeAvin G(Iceuoi ansivi — IF c O✓ere /gar k i'D rot/i(lc (Pao{ci v'4'1 vt,5 'f-0 Cmacc ti- 6" Gi t SP�c/�t/ n�c, s OP d- .3— bv►' /ts haw. ay Sa Fc o�'n 9 00rill W�,✓ d c ✓l d q SET I og " Tr l� L- v�2 How r'h y w nd2✓ y-n. - s f• h d co '71-1 n ' ,a v P1 d-.c,` S_ 2 rat We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas In which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. . dczeFaA109--- 1Rn 3Jq/ 7f Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date g Rev.6/88 envrvsht DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF-150-90 APPLICATION NO(S).: SA;V-150-90 PROPONENT: Ed Gonzales PROJECT TITLE: Alexander Place BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant is seeking: (1) site plan approval for a 6-unit multi-family residential complex; (2) a variance from setback requirements for Burnett Avenue, and (3) a variance from setback requirements for Smithers Avenue. LOCATION: SEC: 17, 18, 19&20 TWNSHP:23N RNG:5E 633 Burnett Avenue TO: PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION SCHEDULED TAC DATE: 3/8/91 ENGINEERING SECTION TRAFFIC ENG. SECTION UTILITIES ENG. SECTION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION CONSTRUCTION FIELD SERVICES DEVELOPMENT PLANNING PLANNING &TECHNICAL SERVICES PARKS AND RECREATION DIVISION OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5:00 P.M. ON MARCH 1, 1991. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: SeL uk-1 kuATCA APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS K NOT APPROVED `(he ,G efI tCCt14T $i a I ;b�(K;e1 rcp(, 47-9 1. ✓�5�,Z� the_ ex').shr) .6 rwe,r ash 4-0,,, g " O.v Sm -��is .5, f, / va-Fc Go hhcekhons are eriifr )n*0 eXIS�'1-rn fi 7 O 10� Ste,✓ I► Mks r► ( o� , n h vch -114 to s Fro w, fs .shy �l be_ G6 `J' ' l'1 sah'i1vy S e r/ 5 b y r4 v .F1 Pot. d ra �,s o✓ A iv((Alr0.v 'td,'Jo arK,hyr ap e �o. re�ph 4x,.pyry Scfatro� �d direr Flow 4-o GI�ff 50014'avy S?.W s ski` rr u pvrop s- �ro.1 .h .� all be de ,ghe_d lrl �iecoi'otou cc 5vv'I H Gt s r ! r- a m i t y %I i P�-- S*atrovl S-iridaid 5 , A"(1(6 41- 31,411 1- .,,,,,°� few) fhow �� �11 ✓�rJi� irS� avid( q lorvF,1e o� -fro o1v,`,( 540 / Sew'Zr,S/ Z2"1 �3�f c J 1rr,ZO r5 agl-e. 5k o-wrvj 9(( ofrOn"ct f� �t ,sewqr a y d 14,q 1Cr ` 10 ' wall fe / I g 1/6 7.c4( n-►,n riciv S-j°"1 el✓1 c1 SPA,I<,r/` S W9 11 le w4 II. /147, Q�JI4 '2 DATE: 3/ q161 SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV.5/90 devrvsht 4 , DEPARTM....r OF PLANNING/BUILDING/PUI WORKS ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET iNNoFhy►o 1 � c?yF si N � o: REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: L. .' 1 t4 -e c: 5 99� ' DATE CIRCULATED: 2/15/91 COMMENTS DUE: 3/1/91e �V ECF-150-90 APPLICATION NO(S): SA;V-150-90 PROPONENT: Ed Gonzales PROJECT TITLE: Alexander Place BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant is seeking: (1) site plan approval for a 6-unit multi-family residential complex; (2) a variance from setback requirements for Burnett Avenue, and (3) a variance from setback requirements for Smithers Avenue. LOCATION: 633 Burnett Avenue SITE AREA: 9100 sf BUILDING AREA(gross): IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS: PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth 2. Air 3. Water 4. Plants 5. Animals 6. Energy&Natural Resources 7. Environmental Health 8. Land &Shoreline Use 9. Housing 10. Aesthetics 11. Light&Glare 12. Recreation 13. Historic&Cultural Preservation 14. Transportation 15. Public Services 16. Utilities COMMENTS: I hs � HaTio� p f ro✓e ie-rds a�� es;0,7 Criyi Re€+o1 S-44da/ds ,F ev Jo f - �X +ns�o1 of ys ;1i]�ies. in (v�1�s ids- a114 v Fare Prot6,a72 Seri iqklev 1V41, 1-s qi4al ClOrKerh � w4 te4 sexy,c e5 g s — Sv b e ref- i s a I) a 1 c4 Jotc 5� s d e-itp�(,o�1- f- ��es r eh/ c a d Pees re-v1 sl'cf 1°P We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas In which we have expertise and have Jdentified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. 7KtfA; "SI: Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date Rev. 6/88 envrvsht DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF-150-90 APPLICATION NO(S).: SA;V-150-90 PROPONENT: Ed Gonzales PROJECT TITLE: Alexander Place BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant Is seeking: (1) site plan approval for a 6-unit multi-family residential complex; (2) a variance from setback requirements for Burnett Avenue, and (3) a variance from setback requirements for Smithers Avenue. • LOCATION: SEC: 17, 18, 19&20 TWNSHP: 23N RNG:5E 633 Burnett Avenue ' TO: PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION SCHEDULED TAC DATE: 3/8/91 ENGINEERING SECTION TRAFFIC ENG. SECTION UTILITIES ENG. SECTION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION CONSTRUCTION FIELD SERVICES DEVELOPMENT PLANNING PLANNING &TECHNICAL SERVICES PARKS AND RECREATION DIVISION OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5:00 P.M. ON MARCH 1, 1991. • REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: LCicT APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED t r� s erg qr p lci.vs ro r voter ry n / r0- e/Wv s 44 ) 'er ^sj o Frrr- d.e.ves% f E-X+e/v1S o 1-, � ' • r 5 1�n ► r,a i 4" at l o� '�r► - 1 j`°,S ';;'hot ll be V s, z-e-ef fo: .g'''• P,11 d ex..o{c4 + tekofTIN f r o I; e in o l'der-+a a c Cori v rr re- Pry/• u "i/ show, v� g►^w°-°' 11 ot-,r Ib,es 'tZ�-I- e-XI are sf�Y ha be co-rv-,- dray r .4 d h f l(4-7 ri o re- -(a . -s � �l t 7 1-c(1) sp►'i ra_ el_ doilsts S e 1/I G CS at s re-/ • S v bJ`e- iv a II (CA 41 e/ ee.r m t�- o1w�(o� " Fei'S weer ww r s. �� DATE: SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESEIA REV. 5/90 devrvsht PROPERTY MANAGEMENT FEE REVIEW (-1 _ ir- ' i DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET 0 PLAN/REVIEW ROUTING SLIP TY ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET 0 OTHER _ APPLICANT: +44dotti 3 �✓Ci JOB ADDRESS: . -Z NATURE OF WORK: lj 1.14.r.t"at £U DATE RECEIVED BY RECEIVED FROM o COMMENTS DUE I WO# PRO ERTY*GMT.___ IArm % • £ 3/i 1G��J GREEN# �FEES APPLIED 0 NEED MORE INFORMATION 0 LEGAL DESCRIPTION 0 NOT APPROVED FOR 0 FRONT FOOTAGE L±f SQUARE FOOTAGE �S,,711 APPLICATION OF FEES 4�,�. ) 7 0 VICINITY MAP 0 OTHER It is the intent of this development fee analysis to put the developer/owner on notice,that the fees quoted below will apply to the subject site upon development of the property. All quoted fees are due and payable at the time the construction permit is issued to install the on-site and off-site improvements(i.e.underground utilities,street improvements,etc.) PRIVATE DEVELOPER HELD PROJECT COST LATECOMER LATECOMER AGREEMENT NO. PER. FTG. FEE WATER SEWER OTHER �©+ SPECIAL ASSESS NT DISTRICT FTG. SAD FEE WATER bt Ao. Ws SLD - $1q. L!G a g8:99 4"� sqi Va. SEWER OTHER ' SPECIAL UTILITY CONNECTION CHARGE-WATER UNITS SUCC FEE Single family residential dwelling unit$940/lot x Apartment,Condo,each multiplex unit$545/ea.unit x ZA A / cl p. BD Commercial/Industrial$.126/sq.ft.of property x (not less than$940.00) SPECIAL UTILITY CONNECTION CHARGE-SEWER UNITS SUCC FEE Single family residential dwelling unit$470/lot x Apartment,Condo,each multiplex unit$270/ea.unit x (Q '�,J lea D.00 Commercial/Industrial$.063/sq.ft.of property x (not less than$470.00) TOTAL: $ ZO/ 972. +/-g- co The above quoted fees do NOT include inspection fees,side sewer permits,r/w permit fees or the cost of water meters. 70 '"'' ' 4 1)?* 18cP30.5- g0e,/' li lN. attliott. �t . , , fr- 4/, Ai/ N. Signature of Director or Authorized Repre e DATE •/techsav/f. s/kwr/1»i/rr • °' DEPARTMOT OF PLANNING/BUILDING/PU WORKS ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Cu r e.Ad ° Pelo ti FNTvi DATE CIRCULATED: 2/15/91 COMMENTS DUE: 3/1/91N GRDEIsol0N ECF-150-90 MAR .0 6 1991 APPLICATION NO(S): SA;V-150-90 HCiV ED PROPONENT: Ed Gonzales PROJECT TITLE: Alexander Place BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant is seeking: (1) site plan approval for a 6-unit multi-family residential complex; (2) a variance from setback requirements for Burnett Avenue, and (3) a variance from setback requirements for Smithers Avenue. LOCATION: 633 Burnett Avenue SITE AREA: 9100 sf BUILDING AREA(gross): IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS: PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth 2. Air 3. Water • v 4. Plants Lv 5. Animals 6. Energy&Natural Resources //• 7. Environmental Health 8. Land &Shoreline Use 9. Housing 10. Aesthetics 11. Light&Glare 12. Recreation 13. Historic&Cultural Preservation 14. Transportation 15. Public Services 16. Utilities ti ckX COMMENTS: l Woad/hi:1W �feire� br' '— a�,e-es GB 070,07 •'-��Gam•�zls vs� � I t4'/ICl / i�p c a'/7r�dG GF" G d be/ 7' 4� Re-c17 .sie.--/-Aote?e-.` e-,1 "favf`/;. y ,may/� G� YGie� of Pi o e Sai",G�� wg/`s, ./4 ice/r c.�,S�� u��re.-w,_— a Ci 4w c-c�6 ez del l/d� (/ 1 Yl5 Q S/4GdwX e Ia G4 AGO ig 'X" -�i•/S e-0 /poi.`A/c--- 4s,a-rk GsG��6lGG�lG SisZ7/e--ia!Pr/ We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. 37,-/77 Signature of Director or orized Representative Date Rev.6/88 envrvsht r _ 1 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF-150-90 ' APPLICATION NO(S).: SA;V-150-90 PROPONENT: Ed Gonzales PROJECT TITLE: Alexander Place BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant is seeking: (1) site plan approval for a 6-unit multi-family residential complex; (2) a variance from setback requirements for Burnett Avenue, and (3) a variance from setback requirements for Smithers Avenue. LOCATION: SEC: 17, 18, 19&20 TWNSHP:23N RNG:5E 633 Burnett Avenue TO: PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION SCHEDULED TAC DATE: 3/8/91 ENGINEERING SECTION TRAFFIC ENG. SECTION UTILITIES ENG. SECTION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION CONSTRUCTION FIELD SERVICES DEVELOPMENT PLANNING PLANNING &TECHNICAL SERVICES PARKS AND RECREATION DIVISION OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5:00 P.M. ON MARCH 1, 1991. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: ' ���f/!/!�7 APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED `/waref" l/a%1/e—(Lre/y%rre,0 r/aN/a`74ei eir<i y,'a, w/// Z-4k,S aG.`/. • w,',few DATE: .3 Ste/ 77 SIG ATURE OF DIRECTOR 0 HORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV.5/90 devrvsM . DEPARTM—__T OF PLANNING/BUILDING/PU C WORKS ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET CrrY®F RENTc RECEIVED REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Ccv1s VILC.IJ FEB 1 1991 DATE CIRCULATED: 2/15/91 COMMENTS DUE: 3/1/91 �UILCING DIVIS ECF-150-90 PLANNING,DiVisio�y CITY OF RENTON APPLICATION NO(S): SA;V-150-90 PROPONENT: Ed Gonzales FEB 15 1991_ PROJECT TITLE: Alexander Place tl 1 �,�r� f BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant is seeking: (1) site plan approval for a 6-unit multi-family residential complex; (2) a variance from setback requirements for Burnett Avenue, and (3) a variance from setback requirements for Smithers Avenue. LOCATION: 633 Burnett Avenue SITE AREA: 9100 sf BUILDING AREA(gross): IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS: PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth 2. Air 3. Water 4. Plants 5. Animals 6. Energy&Natural Resources 7. Environmental Health 8. Land &Shoreline Use 9. Housing 10. Aesthetics 11. Light&Glare 12. Recreation 13. Historic&Cultural Preservation 14. Transportation 15. Public Services 16. Utilities COMMENTS: J. Ace '! 5 4 t. , .,*< 7.1 �.- . We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. /) e"- / Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date Rev.6/88 envrvsht DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF-150-90 APPLICATION NO(S).: SA;V-150-90 PROPONENT: Ed Gonzales PROJECT TITLE: Alexander Place BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant Is seeking: (1) site plan approval for a 6-unit multi-family residential complex; (2) a variance from setback requirements for Burnett Avenue, and (3) a variance from setback requirements for Smithers Avenue. LOCATION: SEC: 17, 18, 19&20 TWNSHP:23N RNG:5E 633 Burnett Avenue TO: PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION SCHEDULED TAC DATE: 3/8/91 ENGINEERING SECTION TRAFFIC ENG. SECTION UTILITIES ENG.SECTION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION , "LCONSTRUCTION FIELD SERVICES DEVELOPMENT PLANNING PLANNING&TECHNICAL SERVICES PARKS AND RECREATION DIVISION OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5:00 P.M. ON MARCH 1, 1991. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: `-'a44 c-4141Y1 010tC. J APPROVED ✓ PPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED l , R.. e .-.. . 1 / 074.1.4,0467.„..04 DATE: SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 5/90 devrvsht DEPARTLit i T OF PLANNING/BUILDING/PL.. IC WORKS ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET RENTON FIRE DEPT. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: 9r'� fAr -1-,e-VS1141/N FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU DATE CIRCULATED: 2/15/91 COMMENTS DUE:F3/1%91 1991 ECF- 150-90 RECEIVED APPLICATION NO(S): SA;V-150-90 , A 4n*. P PROPONENT: Ed Gonzales 166` 6 1 PROJECT TITLE: Alexander Place NOISbloa oN°'WO BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant is seeking: (1) site plan approval for a 6-unit mtYW mily residential complex; (2) a variance from setback requirements for Burnett Avenue, and (3) a variance from setback requirements for Smithers Avenue. LOCATION: 633 Burnett Avenue SITE AREA: 9100 sf BUILDING AREA(gross): IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS: PROBABLE• PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth 2. Air 3. Water 4. Plants • 5. Animals 6. Energy&Natural Resources 7. Environmental Health 8. Land&Shoreline Use 9. Housing 10. Aesthetics 11. Light&Glare 12. Recreation 13. Historic&Cultural Preservation 14. Transportation 15. Public Services 16. Utilities / 1 COMMENTS: NQ `o r p Cl5 4) /ej We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. ins,,, I r 0 0 9/ Signature of Director or Authorized Rgpr entative Date Rev.6/88 envnrsht DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF-150-90 APPLICATION NO(S).: SA;V-150-90 PROPONENT: Ed Gonzales PROJECT TITLE: Alexander Place BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant is seeking: (1) site plan approval for a 6-unit multi-family residential complex; (2) a variance from setback requirements for Burnett Avenue, and (3) a variance from setback requirements for Smithers Avenue. LOCATION: SEC: 17, 18, 19&20 TWNSHP:23N RNG:5E 633 Burnett Avenue TO: PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION SCHEDULED TAC DATE: 3/8/91 ENGINEERING SECTION TRAFFIC ENG. SECTION UTILITIES ENG. SECTION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION CONSTRUCTION FIELD SERVICES DEVELOPMENT PLANNING PLANNING&TECHNICAL SERVICES PARKS AND RECREATION DIVISION OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5:00 P.M. ON MARCH 1, 1991. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: Z LAJ i A G JLfl / D`l APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED , -44 ! 4! 'i� lts . 00Q C. , an/%dUJ c .e OW COh, SfielRe ''0 `1 COrççy i4J 411/414at , I. !id, / q DATE: / 9 SIGNATURE OF DIREC ill ;l' UTHORIZED REPRr� NTATIVE REV. 5/90 devrvsht =Jr , , - ; ,:. \ ; i� i - ..L` .r . 1' CITY OF RENTON ��.__ E..,7«w!cr-- >r�:- COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT FEB 15 S1 . f' ' I- 1;1i� . 200 Mill Avenue South -Renton, Washington 98055 r._-;- "- i_9 1,` gi).G-c;il v 296390-0070-07 . GALLOWAY DAVID 13314 SE '181t PL - RENTON -WA 98058 NOT DELIVERABLE� `'---- • • AS ADDRESSED -e' w Ific! UNABLE TO FORWARD ZZ 8- RETURN TO WRITER '4/ �-A`- • • NOTICE OF PROPOSED SITE PLAN APPROVAL AND VARIANCE APPLICATION RENTON,WASHINGTON A Site Plan Approval and Variance Application has been filed and accepted with the Development Services Division of the City of Renton. The following briefly describes the application and the necessary Public Approvals. PROJECT NAME/NUMBER: Alexander Place • ECF;SA;V-150-90 • DESCRIPTION: Applicant is seeking: (1) site plan approval for a 6-unit multi- family residential complex; (2) a variance from setback requirements for.Burnett Avenue, and (3) a variance from setback requirements for Smithers Avenue. . GENERAL LOCATION: 633 Burnett Avenue PUBLIC APPROVALS: Environmental Review Site Plan Approval Building Permit • The application can be reviewed in the Development Services Division located on the third floor of Renton City Hall. Comments will be accepted anytime prior to Public Hearings, during Public Hearings, or prior to an administrative site plan approval. For further information on the application, or if you wish to be made a PARTY OF RECORD and receive additional notifications, by mail, of the City's environmental determinations, appeal periods and/or the public hearing date(s) for this project, please contact the Development Services Division at 235-2550. Please include the project NUMBER when calling for proper file identification. 3 H . 114.10' • ° ia UNorz(BoJetD 'PAW NC{ - /// 1 i / ,i 7 z �I y, o. ��iLt. ; /7.-11.7 /ei . 6 • �NJ :PAewiup o / ' 11 , / e�2 / LO'•O' I 12'-O' 70'•L 1 IV-O' Z 23'-4' / • / •FlRC I 1 "ve.o • ` •a.'cPY // N• �• I HYDRANT .—.—.—, .—._,'.—.—.— / l Cuee�- 61.l.4' . Q SCALE I':Id-0° Emir r o 1 PLOT RAN •9 6.33 t5UR}JETT RCIJTOIJ WA II JULY 20 1990 4-50UrH. SEV 41TH 5TR .1-4.- , genmalot %•• CIT'� T>OF RENTON ma. ` Planning/Building/Public Works Department Earl Clymer, Mayor Lynn Guttman,Administrator • February 14, 1991 Edward Gonzalez 11015-142nd Ave SE Renton,WA 98056 SUBJECT: Alexander Place ECF;SA;V-150-90 Dear Mr. Gonzalez: The Development Planning Section of the City of Renton has formally accepted the above-referenced. application for preliminary review. It is tentatively scheduled for consideration by the Technical Advisory Committee on March 8, 1991. Following that review, you will be notified that: 1)your application is complete and has been scheduled for environmental review and determination, or 2) that additional information is required to continue processing your application for environmental review. Please contact me, at 235-2550, if you have any questions. Sincerely, 04-As 44,44.• Lenora Blauman Project Manager accptHr/LB/kac 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 NOTICE OF PROPOSED SITE PLAN APPROVAL AND VARIANCE APPLICATION .RENTON,WASHINGTON ' A Site Plan Approval and Variance Application has been filed and accepted with the Development Services Division of the City of Renton. The following briefly describes the application and the necessary Public - Approvals. PROJECT NAME/NUMBER: Alexander Place • ECF;SA;V-150-90 DESCRIPTION: Applicant is seeking: (1) site plan approval for a 6-unit multi- family residential complex; (2) a variance from 'setback requirements for Burnett Avenue, and (3) a variance from setback requirements for Smithers Avenue. GENERAL LOCATION: 633 Burnett Avenue ° PUBLIC APPROVALS: Environmental Review Site Plan Approval • ' • Building Permit The application can be reviewed in the Development Services Division located on the third floor of Renton City Hall. Comments will be accepted anytime prior to Public Hearings, during Public Hearings, or prior to an'administrative site plan approval. For further information on the application, or if you wish to be made a PARTY OF RECORD and receive additional notifications, by mail, of the City's environmental determinations, appeal periods and/or the public hearing date(s) for this project, please contact the Development Services Division at 235-2550. Please,include the project NUMBER when calling for proper file identification. "- y . • 4 I 9 % i , uN .1enuuv PAerJuq % /(2,..I %3p �,'O. e o I Q a i i D / ou 9R frf v�p.�' •r i W LN upwuv 0 px.F1Re /. Q J Iv 50'"0° PROFVSED • ba 0 DR1ve • P�LKCRY N . Fl� \� uer,__c . . . , :7.; _.—._.— / Q SCALE I°:ld•O° Linn o zo PLOT I9 AIJ •° L33 BU.}JETT RE UTON WA n3 JULY 20 1990 �I 0- —soUrF1 *W-4JT�i kF"ST sT 4_ enma t • i I OF Rtoy .r $ 0 Z NoTicE .i � „ O n Q TO 43. ` g94 1-6-0 MO" OF PENDING SITE PLAN APPLICATION ,: DESCRIPTION : . ALEXANDER PLACE ECF;SA;V-150-90 1 APPLICANT IS SEEKING: (1) SITE PLAN APPROVAL FOR A 6-UNIT MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL COMPLEX; ET(T2) A VARIANCE F AND ROM , SETBACK VARIANCE REAUIREMENTS FOR SETBACK REQUIREMENTS FOR SMITHERS AVENUESO(�N ' FROM GENERAL LOCATION AND/OR ADDRESS: • . 633 BURNETTAVENUE S ouTh1 PUBLIC APPROVALS REQUIRED : 1 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW . SITE PLAN APPROVAL BUILDING PERMIT PUBLIC COMMENTS WILL BE RECEIVED BY THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT .ANYTIME PRIOR TO PUBLIC HEARINGS AND DURING PUBLIC HEARINGS. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CALL THE CITY OF RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT 235-2550 THIS NOTICE NOT TO BE REMOVED -- ____ WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION • • CERTIFICATION I , j"farrj S&A/e(r� , HEREBY CERTIFY THAT3 COPIES OF • THE ABOVE DOCUMENT WERE POSTED BY ME IN 8 CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON OR NEARBY THE DESCRIBED. PROPERTY ON ��— )6-9I ®s®�sao®oeei.o.,, S°°°° oNI:1ETit 47 gee • Q' 'gSlOti ee ti� 1ST Subscribed and sworn to before me, a J NOTARY iabt S,Public, in and for the State of Washington • y CA. Pue�fe r�sidi� in on the SIGNED : �t 04- OF RED T NOTICE $94TF0 SEPSEM'8P OF PENDING SITE PLAN APPLICATION DESCRIPTION : ALEXANDER PLACE . ECF;SA;V-150-90 APPLICANT IS SEEKING: (1) SITE PLAN APPROVAL FOR A 6-UNIT MULTI-FAMILY I (FOR BURNETT AVENUE, (2) VARIANCE SETBACK REQUIREMENTSAND (3) A VARIANCE FROM SETBACK REQUIREMENTS FOR SMITHERS AVENUE. GENERAL LOCATION AND/OR ADDRESS: 633 BURNEITAVENUE PUBLIC APPROVALS REQUIRED : ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW SITE PLAN APPROVAL BUILDING PERMIT PUBLIC COMMENTS WILL BE RECEIVED BY THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT ANYTIME PRIOR TO PUBLIC HEARINGS AND DURING PUBLIC HEARINGS. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CALL THE CITY OF RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT 235-2550 THIS NOTICE NOT TO BE REMOVED WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION DDI — Architecture & Planning AlwrumeriVolt 6i Xfakif414 gearit February 11, 1991 City of Renton Community Development Department Municipal Building 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 RE: Burnett, and Smithers Variance Current zoning code restrictions are as follows: Smithers Ave. S. (Front Yard) - 20'-0" Burnett Ave S. (Front Yard) - 25'-0" S. 7th Street (Front Yard) - 25'-0" Variance to Front Yard Setbacks are requested as follows: Smithers Ave. S. - 10' front yard setback Burnette Ave. S. - 15' front yard setback Justification of Variance for your Consideration: a. An undue hardship exists at this site due to its irregular shape and the existence of 3 separate 'front' yards. b. The granting of a variance at this site would not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in the vicinity and zone. The property is currently abandoned and overgrown with vegetation. An attractive apartment would be a definite improvement to the neighborhood. The neighborhood is currently composed of multi-use with single family, du-plexes, apartments, commercial, and light industrial uses in the immediate area. Great care has been taken to design a building that will be aesthetically pleasing to the neighborhood in both style and scale. c. An approval of this Variance would not constitute any special privilege. This is a very unique parcel with an equally unique set of restrictions. (American Blind, at the corner of Smithers and 6th Street has been built at or very near the front property lines. d. . The variance requested is the minimum required to successfully develop this property. The setback on the west side of the property will remain 10'-0" (along Smithers Avenue) and 15'-0" on the east (along Burnette). Thank you for your consideration. Regards / . // of ey D. Sprin Suite 109 P sident 5540IL:ae Washington Blvd. N.E. Kirkland, Washington 98033 206/822-1724 `' CIT..- OF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works Department Earl Clymer, Mayor Lynn Guttman,Administrator 5 i February' 11, 1991 Mr. Ed Gonzales 11015 142nd Avenue Renton, Washington 98056 RE: Williams Avenue Residential Complex; Alexander Six-Plex Dear Mr. Gonzales: I am writing to confirm that as of this date,: the above-mentioned project applications remain on "hold" awaiting necessary application materials. ¶Ihe revised site plan application for the Williams Avenue project has not yet been received from Kevin Richards. The complete ,variance application for the Alexander six-plex has not yet been received from Jeff Spring. I would be pleased to provide further instruction on the completion of these materials, if you would like, so that the files may be completed in a timely manner and that processing of the applications may begin. However, City policies do not permit the retention of incomplete files -- if these files are completed by February 14th, then we will immediately resume evaluation of ' these proposed developments. Otherwise, we will return the files to you and will be pleased to receive them again when all materials have been completed. I look forward to working, with you to achieve a satisfactory conclusion to these matters. Sincerely, 44AN'AA'astilj 61.4"46.1"1".%"1"1 Lenora Blauman Senior Planner 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 C TY F.RE. MUNITY:DE :C L:<::» :::::>:<::::< ::::::>::::::>::::<:�:>:>:<::::> :::::>::::::>:........ .Q.. . . .. ............ .. �E...pPMENT.DEPAR ENT....... ...................... ......... ..... . ... MAST : > .:APPLi :: ATI > < < >< : > <' >: < >� . : : . >< S ER APP i.... ....... .. .................... <v. VINE:: ` < : : ::::.::;:>:::>:>: :: :::::::> :::::::::: :::: ...... ....:::.......::::::::..::::..... ...i . :>:TYPE>O.F>APPL!CATI:ON�+& :F:EE:S�� ` NAME: *REZONE $ t�G!/'/9 R a Cp Al2. q e. Z —SPECIAL PERMIT • $ _TEMPORARY PERMIT $ ADDRESS: *CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT $ • //D /F_ /4/Z Al (iE. , S'€ x Silt.PLAN APPROVAL $ 6200 ® SPECIAL PERMIT $ CITY: ZIP: GRADE Sc.FILL PERMIT, $ E iv -'�N"t 9$ _A s-G • (NO.CU.YDS: ) *VARIANCE - C 5`�'-J $ (ace, • TELEPHONE NUMBER (FROM SECTION:4- ) 2 S /2 6/ —*WAIVER Cie $ ROUTINE VEGETATION .: Q.0.1 TACT.P:ER:SO.N.:APPLICANT MANAGEMENT PERMIT $ NAACIE: (*JUSTIFICATION REQUIRED) ( /ADDRESS: \ SUBDIVISION: $ //b /F /yZ Aive _ ,5e. . _LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT $ CITY: ZIP: SHORT PLAT $ �f'.,V`r-O 6i�S' / t d'/Vi7`Q A) —TENTATIVE PLAT $ I _PRELIMINARY PLAT $ TELEPHONE NUMBER ,) / —FINAL PLAT $ Z`Z$'— /2 C I . . . 2 9 Z ' / NO.OF LOTS: :...:.:. PLAT NAME: ..:..::OJECT�NFrJ.RMATI<Q:N.;:.;:.> .;.;:.::.;: PROJECT ORDEVELOPMENT NAME: PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: $ —PRELIMINARY OURO✓ a 7-r-._ So cf Th _FINAL PROPERTY/PROJECT ADDRESS(S)/LOCATION: - 6-33 50' /v r T _BINDING SITE PLAN: $ 4 viz. - So'-H KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER(S): MOBILE HOME PARKS: $ / '230S--. 7o6 ! - 05- _TENTATIVE EXISTING LAND USE(S): _PRELIMINARY FINAL /' 7 mu t..Yi~,F4A4,`L.y PARK NAME: EXISTING ZONING: NO.OF SPACES: Rci > — -- ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW $ �00 PROPOSED LAND USE(S): • P> 'PROJECT VALUE: $2q°i C ' ' SENSITIVE AREA:. . , • &Ai-./r 4/9 /9 r�'(f�w� P C9 F bJ C.Cl , APA: —1 —2 —OTHER /A SEWER MORATORTT_IM AREA: YES NO''`; PROPOSED ZONING: • , NA- ,. , • • ,', • . TOTAL FEES: .. • . ,$ SITE AREA(SQ.FT.OR ACREAGE): DATE PAID: ' POSTAGE PROVIDED: . _YES NO 4 Pk°x - /00 r' . . . . I—. , i�Lr4I�NEE�EG DiVJSiON , s In t.•,:i�si�i�sr"ffi ���i:s;�'$Si>�i;y;.ty' : :`:�:�i•:2;�i'.�>;�i�iiis;i�i;�:i���>����::'i;;;i;i�ii:ii;i��r'Jt�i.;5isissi�i<�r�ii:t?:'�i�'S:�ri� �3ii?�i��i;"` sot to b :c;i� •�•:�.:•,•.:•:,:•: il:` : 4t.gk:>:.:..:' :'. :.;: .: :::::>: : :: ::::::<>:::: : : :::: >' .....<::: : >:::::s::�:: :: >> ': : : : :::::;: :::>::::::::z:::::::::>:< ::: :::` :: ::::: .:i> .:UD::z:::FP:[ID::::: _w>' ME`>:�PMH :::.FNtHP� ::: P.:<:::::;:::::::<:::>: ::»::::::>:<: :>::>:::::< > :: »::»::: ;;>::::::�<:;:::;> :::»:: >:::>:::<:::::<: 11 or i .r• d ease.at c se'��`�ate s f . • gF,7 NN . Nj 9T i9 ,po.'.v T" .550Q'72 FEET ANo /6 FEE1 oRrii ©F • I T/k' C,P R Ai E r2 C'o /'7/v o V Sff c--t.`e5,.v s /7, /8, /9' pAIO Z O 7Faiius ki,`N 2 3 No.'1I/ /2Z'AJ S EA s r Gr/. m.✓ /N ,<'ti; £ /Art , ///,51s//.'A.r9-ins, S4 �Q 1) T1BM; /1E/5O ALo.v 1;4v� � ` , To -r, ! .vE gE?'w E Al _5-€c.fi.`oAr5 / 4,vO I.9 'F6 EST T//ENc' E.4 T //5' /= F j Mfi biz• dam: .Za /7776, 7G66 .a9dE s z' L/ivy ®g f'vRn/rz rr- -5TRErET 7 4 A cF ,$So ,T1i ig /9La.v ' cc,gr.lt,:a .5-,41/O. S-7"-R T TO 4 0o/'o /6 t^ad Nogr/4 r% Socfr/', 6/,vz o/ 0 S c-1-10, 'v /3"; !7/ .vc e.12e-s7--67 9S' Fr� T of rhie. Poe,fi7"©F tze .'.t!-,t//'N� I � I � , I, w A Ft, Go A.) , bed' g duly sworn, declare that I am (please check one) _ the authorized representative to act for the property owner, v.the owner of the property involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. • }'., SUBSCRIBED SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS d DAY OF 19 '7 !] - NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR THE STATE OF WASHINGTON,RESIDING AT: • • (Name of Notary Public (Signature of e /77 �i(9�� //O/S'- /gZ Avs . (Address) Address) (City/State/Zip) (City/State/Zip) --e/Ze(e/ /2.6 / • (Telephone) (Telephone) Acceptance of this application and required filing fee does not constitute a complete application. Plans and other material required to constitute a complete application are listed in the"Application Procedure." RtnMastr 2/90 , • . ______._ _______,__. . , , , .,,-: - • „ . . . . . • , , ,.., . . . • _ • „ ,,, . .. , . . • . , . . . , . . . . , . . • • . , • '-'" • . , . ' • ., , . , . . . . • , . . . • . . . . • , . . . . • ' ' . , . . . . , . . . .., , , • . _ , : . . • . . . ' -. <I , . ' . . . . . . • . . . . .. '•:- . ' LEGAL. DESCRIPTION- . , .: H_.- - BEGINNING AT A POINT •550.72 FEET 'WEST AND 16 "FEET NORTH' OF THE CORNER - ", -• ", COMMON TO SECTIONS 17, 18, 19 AND 20, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE -5 EAST, - -- • „ ' .. W.M., IN KING COUNTY,. WASHINGTON, SAID DISTANCE BEING MEASURED -ALONG . , " ' ,- -• . AND ;AT RIGHT ANGLES TO THE LINE BETWEEN SECTIONS 18 AND 19; -- -• '•-- ''' •'-• .• ''. • - , .• THENCE NORTH 86.95 FEET; - • ' ,,- .. THENCE EAST 115 FEET, ,MORE OR LESS; TO .THE WEST UNE OF BURNETT STREET; • .THENE SOUTHWESTERLY.ALONG THE CURVE OF SAID STREET' TO, A POINT 16 FEET :, • -__ NORTH OF THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID' SECTION 18; : . :';' ':':: '. THENCE WEST 67.95 FEET TO THE POINT OF-BEGINNING; . • . . BEING KNOWN AS LOT 10, WOODS ADDITION TO THE CITY OF' RENTON, ACCORDING • -• TO THE UNRECORDED PLAT THEREOF." • „ .- ' . _ , . . . ,_.. , • . • • . . , • , . . r. . . . . ,. . . . . . , . . , •. . . . „ . • „ , , . • . , . . . .. . • , • . • . , . ., • . • , . . . . . , , . . .. , ., , LANNING.DIVISION - ' , , , :. .Om(OF RENTON' ' ' ' . . , . . . . : : . NOV 2 81g90 ,. , .• rait,A ; :a•iyip L ,.) . ' L .: . NOTES . . , ... . .. , . . . ' - LOT 10 IS SUBJECT. TO AN EASEMENT FOR AN ELECTRIC' TRANSMISSION LINE PER AUDITOR'S No. 3477507 RECORDED .JUNE 12, 1945. • - • - . , . . . _ •,,;„ . . . .,., .. . . . . . . . • . „ , ., , , . . , • • '• •,- ' • . . . • 0 • • =1 1=1 • CI =I • 1=1 Ef 1:1 R-3 . lz- =R.-4 El I= 1Z- • El Er . D CI CI - K-AI- El = . • 1=1 El , [0 4— -_. . S LAM. ST >. - 1=1 El . ( I(i•-;( i la El El - , 0 : S . - itgii .11-2 Ei El s . I 1 . > ,,- ' . - / - I-1- L71 Vi'pe4-4V ,.- -,- -- =I v) . 1_-1 :f;'Ll?L'E`'' 4 5I-IKIP 4 al ile,. ..: 121.)PL0-x. At-LE-r QT < . • _R-1- 1=1 .,-, EI ').; v.--4a1 a E " m 4/3 iiy • I=1 '71 1E-771.: 1=1 2 R-4-1=1 $ L- 1 13-1 0 Er iie.1-91-A 1-- . , El LI t • .E:1 -- 2:. M /1 rwil#04. • . 1 I 11 .,,,->---e- o V.,&.-/ tI44- 1.11-H0.. • I I El a PI . - s -'t-n-t sr vAc-bcre73.,-7-n-i AV 5• . s Fz.psito.4 i - • 11 / i 1=1 K.] I. grAtt 5°e'Eq-A—'41211'' Fr \ Fre.E1&HI- I k-J1-1(Dev.) . %s1-1Kie- 4.o. .../ 5 , L- I .• . - 1 I L- 1 -I Q c-P` • 1 1 . 1 - ogi, C.‘ 1 I11 . . sc-ALT-- In: 2ool-di 1 1 ! I . pLANNI34 DA?- .. E:.-I rry 0- FeaToN 1 KleiGH I50R_Hoop PE-TAI I- 0 0-1 1 . 1401 2 8"9° 1 4033 E3L1lzkiri AV 5 • Ke.GLIV -D Kff--1\1To4 WA .ILIIY 9r) ici6i0 DDI — Architecture & Planning November 27, 1990 City of Renton Community Development Department Municipal Building 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 RE: 6-Unit apartment @ 633 Burnett Avenue South The proposed project is to be a 6-Unit, 3-Story Apartment. This is to be accomplished by combining 3 single-level units under 3 'townhouse' style units, all over outdoor, subterranean parking. The unit range in size from 674 sq. ft. to 1,177 sq. ft. • .Amenities include convenient proximity to downtown and approximately 200' to a Park and Ride facility. The maximum height is 48'-6" above finished grade. Exterior materials are to include stucco, 'sidewall' shakes, and brick veneer. Windows are to be anodized aluminum frame. Roof covering is to be 'Architect 80' or equal composition type. Landscaping will be provided to meet or exceed City of Renton requirements. PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF RENTON NOV 2 NikCEVED Suite 109 5540 Lake Washington Blvd. N.E. Kirkland, Washington 98033 206/822-1724 DDI — Architecture & Planning en J3ud/ ng gear.- November 27, 1990 City of Renton Community Development Department Municipal Building 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 RE: 7th, Burnett, and Smithers Variance Justification of Variance for your Consideration: a. An undue hardship exists at this site due to its irregular shape and the existence of 3 separate 'front' yards. b. The granting of a variance at this site would not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in the vicinity and zone. The property is currently abandoned and overgrown with vegetation. An attractive apartment would be a definite improvement to the neighborhood. The neighborhood is currently composed of multi-use with single family, du-plexes, apartments, commercial, and light industrial uses in the immediate area. Great care has been taken to design a building that will be aesthetically pleasing to the neighborhood in both style and scale. c. An approval of this Variance would not constitute any special privilege. This is a very unique parcel with an equally unique • set of restrictions. (American Blind, at the corner of Smithers and 6th Street has been built at or very near the front property lines. d. The variance requested is the minimum required to successfully develop this property. The setback on the east side of the property will remain 10'-0 ' and 22'-0" on the west (along Burnette). • Thank you for your consideration. • Regarp PLANNING DIVISION /,,� .• cry v OF RENT ON NOV 2 8 1990 %fff ' %pring/A.l.A. { n IUl Pr ident Suite 109 5540 Lake Washington Blvd. N.E. Kirkland, Washington 98033 206/822-1724 EC_C - 150 F�:i:}[ii;i:.:;ii:;ii:•:i:!.:}Y;})}ii}i}i:7i: J:•iii::}}}i'r':iYliic{:}i7i}iii;:y::::y4:•Y!•:•;•i:}::}.;:.,.'"::::+}:{.ii}:.:y}:•: :.i::G:i:}ii::i::i)?::•i): ?ii':::•:is i}::'i?}:o-:•:•}} i}>: 'i::':.:i '.OF..R E NTO ....::.::.:::::::::::::::::::::::::::•:::::::::::::::::::::: .:: : ROIVMENTAL :CHECKLIST,::: :'•;::::.:::.;;::.::.:.::<'::.: :.; Purpose of Checklist: The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), Chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probably significant adverse impacts .on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide • whether an EIS is required. Instructions for Applicants: This environmental checklist ask you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies, .use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise'-infofmati-dn known, or give the best description you can. You must answer-each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you 'should be. able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply". Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impacts. Use of Checklist for Nonproject Proposals: (Please Type or Print Legibly) Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply". IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D). For nonproject actions (actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs), the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: c�'V��l ©Fag°p4 633 Alexander Place 2, A953 (a 6-Unit Apartment) 101 2. Name of applicant: • '`� Edward Golzalez • 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: 11015 - 142nd Ave S.E. - Renton, WA 98056 - 228-1261 - Ed Gonzalez 4. Date checklist prepared: • November 24 1990 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of' Renton • Community Development Department rs -2- 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Commence construction upon receipt of permit 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansions, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. No 8. List any environmental information you know about that has.been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. This document only. 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. Do not know 10. List any governmental approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. Variance of front yard setback requirments & Standard building permit. 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later :in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. a three story, 6-Unit apartment 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including astreet address, if any, and section, township, and range if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topography map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. 633 Burnett Avenue South Renton, Washington B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site (circle one);429 rolling, hilly, steep, slopes, mountainous, other b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate_percent slope?) ± 1% • c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, scaly, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. Sandy Loam • d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. No • -3- e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. • Typical excavations f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. No g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? 56.77 h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: 2. AIR Appropriate Landscaping a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Dust and machinery exhaust during construction Resident's automobiles during occupancy. b. Are there any off-site sources of emission? No c. . Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: • None 3. WATER a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. No 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. NO 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. Does not apply 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. No. 6). Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No • -4- , b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses 'to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. To be connected to existing public sewer facilities c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters, If so, describe. Storm sewer.. is available in Burnett Ave. S. 2) Could waste material enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. No d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: Additional yard drains 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: X deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other X evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other shrubs X grass crop or grain wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants: water lily, eel grass, milfoil, other other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Natural weeds and undergrowth will be replaced with new landscaping. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measure to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: A landscape plan including use of, native plants, Douglass Fir, azalea, dogwood, and red maple:,is being submitted. 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: None Birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other Mammals: deer, ,bear, elk, beaver, other Fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other -5- b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain No d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: Plant trees 6. Energy and Natural Resources • a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, wood, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Electricity - General Residential power needs, Heating of units, and domestic hot water. ' b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. This proposal could possibly affect the property to the North. • c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: Designed to meet all the requirements of W.S.E.C. Prescriptive Path 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals,.risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. No 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. Police, fire, ambulance 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: N/A b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the areas which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? Traffic from commercial and light industrial and residential activity 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Normal construction noise Normal residential traffic 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: None 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Single:.and Multi-family, commercial, light industrial b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. No -6- • c. Describe any structures on the site. Old abandoned single family residence and detarhedrgarage d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? House and garage e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? R-4 f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? R-4 g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the • site? Does not apply h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? • If so, specify. No i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? 12 j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: N/A 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: This project has been designed to be aesthetically pleasing to the existing neighborhood in scale and style. 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether • high, middle, or low-income housing. 6 units /Middle income b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. 1 unit / Low income (non-inhabitable) c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: N/A 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed. • 48'-6" Stucco, sidewall shake siding, brick b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: 'Landscaping 11. Light and Glare -7- a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? Headlight of passing vehicles during hours of darkness. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? 'None d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: • Does not apply 12. Recreation • a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate • - vicinity? Burnett Linear Park b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: Does not apply 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. Does not apply b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. Does not Apply c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: Does not apply -8- • 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. Site is on the corner bordered by Smithers Ave.. S. to the west, S. 7th Street to the south, and Burnett Ave. S. to the east. b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? No - 200' from bus station c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? 11 -•:1 (detached garage) d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private? No • e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. No f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. Unknown.. It is assumed that peak traffic will coincide with,kaverage. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: None 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. Yes b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. None 16. Utilities a. Circle utilities cu ently avai jb),,g_at the site: electricity natural gas efuse servic•, telephone, .anitary sewe septic sys • , ' er. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Water - City of Renton (?`fps • Sewer - City of Renton it Refuse - Rainier Disposal ( g.) Electricity - Puget Power (TIP) Telephone - US West Communications C'f`(p) . . -9- C. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Proponent: Name Printed: L,/ 4 R 0 .0 4_4 L 44 • RENTO • ......................... ***FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY*** PROJECT TITLE: fA\, ,A lam- ICLC-�. APPLICANT: APPLICATION NUMBER: uF, SPt v- b ISO- qQ The following is a list of property owners within 300 feet of the subject site. The Community Development .Department will notify these individuals of 'the proposed development. NAME ADDRESS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER Ward Sylvia A 604 Morris AV S - Renton WA 98055 296390-0010-00 Armitage Kenneth E 612 Morris AV S . Renton WA 98055 296390-0020-08 Hall Viola Cross 637 Morris AV S Renton WA 98055 296390-0030-06 Laurent Ann M 628 Morris AV S Renton WA 98055 296390-0040-04 Wallace William y', Helen 642 Morris AV S • Renton WA 98055 296390-0050-01 Holman Daniel P 627 S Smithers St Renton WA 98055 296390-0065-04 PLANNING DIVISION Meakin A L 7100 Taft::Sf_ .;.,`' ._,�., CITY OF RENTON Seattle'' WA'= :98178, 296390-0075-02 NOV 2 81990 Favro Shearer A M 613 Smithers_.�S. Renton WA ` '98055 296390-0085-00 a Hyland Dennis D 603 Srntthers AV S Renton : WA, . '9'8055; - `• 296390-0100-01 Alhadeff Morrisand Joan 6006 Lake Shore Dritre S Seattle WA 98118 18(2306-9046-05 \ria • • • NAME ASSESSOR'S PARCEL ADDRESS NUMBER • • • Certification • I,� 0 '�� , hereby certify that the above lists) of adjacent property owners :11. and their addres es were taken from the records of the King County Assessor as prescribed by I .5;' ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a Notary Public, in and for the State of Washington residing at - • Bellevue on the 19th day of July 1990 r d/ '�'� • '�t, O �✓ Signed: �i�L9C �" :d.. f ::�:t::h::;e::::>.�:i: ;<:;<:;':�<::':.::�;::::.':n:�;::.;;>::::>:.:::;:::.<::•:::..>.� .e:: ;:::::: a�' IFt: :n.a ' :< <` : : :•c <:.<:: > :: :: • .` �`* *Mdr: '[:-r: : : : :f *'' _ ;: ? S Ohl ;*;;:.;;:.»..;:..>: .. :: 1:i: '<:*:**k* FOr fflc2 . :: <> ':;. . .:. ; .. : ; : :: : :< >'< :: :. :;>;:. .;;: ::: .. ... :. ' ':::.. ' : ;. > : • RIFIATIO iF M LG :4. . 43;?ysQ4 YET : ; �>ii ':i:i�i'i.:`::::»; ; #;:;:� ;>::;�:;:a5:;;::<:>;::: ;.;< : : :::m ::::or� �te:`:>;» ;;;;;;; ;:::::;:::;�: : s::of<th�:: ... . : et>i:�>:: i: �;i�iY ::�> i : i: :i��iiC:.;S1��1 �. :>« : ;: »hereb eert .:::ai ::nQi ::: > o;: ah;lised :adacn� r� : --.::. ,,,.::: .m ( do . ::.> :.' > : :> ':::>: >:: :: : :: :;: ...;. . wres: ai .: ;. ..:..:::: < ::>:; :::: :. ::;';;>:;:<::::> <: _» < :1tc :: ": bdb w�:::>::::»::::>:<:::>:..:::<::: .ro et >.owner:asresc e ': : ;:;::::: :::.::::>:::.' :.. ::: : : r :> :;:'> :::::;:. :.::;:<:::<: : : . :;;::.:;:.:A77STubscne ;an >swon.<to::befo re♦ p�,::.' : :r.q... ,' +`� : >: >; : .. ::::::: . .. : :. . ..; ; .State . <<::.;: �::<::::.; ;�me.:a:Notaoubllcln<a ;:or .. . . ... • < :.: :;< , 77 1+.:::: :. di .: ;:. :>Washn ton:r s . ::.:::.::::::::::::ifie:::::1:::45:::::::::.:::::::::oaTo...::: ... -........:.::::;.:::::::::::::::::::::::::::-.A. :....,,i,6•: g....i...:.: :•._..:....w.:::,.....i.i...:..•:•.: s .....L:.::::;:::.::::••••". ...... ......,..c.--..--.--...:•iii ::.::.:.:.•:•.:.....:..:.;.:.:� el;:.::.:........ .::::... . ............ •. :::::::: .;;::. as .:.:. :,,�e ... • bQedu630 I 1 Rev 5/90 CERTIFIC.doc 4 NAME ADDRESS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER Cugini Alex 617 Burnett St Renton WA 98055 182305-9056-02 Minerich Matt Jr 629 Burnett St 182305-9065-01 Renton WA 98055 Cugini Alex 617 Burnett St Renton WA 98055 182305-9068-08 Knoll Darrell 611 6th AEI Renton WA 98055 182305-9086-06 Williams Robert J 619 Burnett AV S Renton WA 98055 182305-9127-07 Ward John E 604 Morris AV E Renton WA 98055 296390-0010-83 Anderson Carl A 616 Morris AV S • Renton WA 98055 296390-0025-03 Fiskaali Marsha E 622 Morris AV S Renton WA 98055 296390-0035-01 Goiiedridge Ross J 1711 1/2 Capitol Way S Olympia WA 98501 296390-0045-09 East R C 19210 4th S Seattle WA 98148 296390-0055-06 Galloway David 13314 SE 181st PL Renton WA 98058 296390-0070-07 Court Norma Perala 619 ,nithers St Ren.to.fL WA—98055 98055 296390-0080-05 Frei Herbert A 611 and 611 1/2 Smithers AV S Renton WA 98055 296390-0090-03 Puget Western /Inc 411 108th AV NE . Bellevue WA 98004 915460-0005-07 City of Renton 200 Mill AV. S Bennett W E Renton WA .98055 182305-9051-07 Lisenbee Peggy L 618 Smithers AV S . Renton WA 98055 182305-9060-06 Cugini Alex .617 Burnett St Renton WA 98055 182305-9066-00 Garrick Thomas E 10238 66th Av S Seattle WA 98178 182305-9091-09 NAME ADDRESS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER Swinhart William S 621 Burnett AV S Renton WA 98055 182305-9091-09 Dolan Larry E 13525 181st AV SE Renton WA 98056 784030-0015 Castagno Bros. Rev. Trust 423 S. 7th ST Renton WA 98057 192305-9024-09 Castagno Bros. Rev. Trust 423 S 7th ST Renton WA 98057 192305-9077-08 Puget Western Inc 411 108th AV NE Bellevue WA 98004 192305-9077-05 Puget Western Inc 411 108th AV NE Bellevue WA 98004 192305-9092-06 Horbach Eugene . P 0 Box 598 Bellevue WA 98009 192305-9070-02 ..`•.• , , - • • .. •- •4";;',,',*,! . . • • .. -,-...;;;;;.,i ' : . • . .. . =1,1.:'5.i.• , ... , : ,.. . q.,-0.2ii.. '••. ;- •.. ••' . ,!/1-- -e.2:! -. . .. : •,..1 .... ;''' I ••••,::'' • • ,.':;;:I:',.-;• - ' • . .• , .. ' '• ., ., . . .., . •• •f : 1‘.''...',•••)" '.. ... ; . : • ,.....,, . ;';.;=;‘';.;',.." . . • .. .-- . • • .:•••.•,'...i. • • • • . .. . . . ., . ... .. . . . . • • ...1;;;‘,?!.1;.,,Y . :, •::' :„. :, '.•:; . 4111.;',:l '2:.; ','; •*'•::. ;.••.."•;21.";•:• ' • .; :'7.1.4j;;I,. . .. : • ,;,. ':•.;•-• . •.. . ''...f.',.;.;:•;.t.•,.'. • - . !!!.;.n,ii•';•:•; : , •- •).."- • .,...• , •::: ;'' •tii.;•;:.,', :' ., .".; .-: •,. ',, •• •. ':::P..;.••. ' ' • :-..:-.:•••••;:• ''•,.''••i' •,- • • ' • ' *:; '... •••:: : •;P.q..;,. • • '-,.• *, •'.• • • ••;,1:1ii.,z••••;•'. • . •f;::.;:%•; . .. ; ..:'!•;'''11.'•;:;::;:'.1 ;* . ::.:, . '.• . ; :*....;;* ; ?.A,';'•;*. '• . ;:: .;:;•:•,, .,. :: •:..';;;7. . 1.;•,-3,•.i . ,, .. ‘; , .,,•.; ,. .‘• . •;,!.4,!•...s..;' .. • • ' ,. • • . . „ .. .. ... . ••:,,,:';.;:iy.. , . .L..... . . .'. .• '., . ' '• •`----'• • , ''N:h% It''...:•::r•:` .). . -,., . • •• .••• l';I:b.'''P, , .:••::?, ,•,'. :. .','• ...lifki.1;;".'-' . •• " .';; .....• .i.; ,• • : •:',,e,...i31. . '. s ''' • - „, ... ''..t•f,..''f! • . ': .4::';.a • , •'• '•.,,'..1 . , ,.,.. • . .. . ,'i.,ntill •••!'"•t:..'4,• • . • ' :‘ .."..,..• . . .. . „ , ...i1;!:'...1j;' - . .' '..•• • . '_. '. : ' • ..te;,,•4:' . ,.,..:: . ,..• ::.„,5,1,•; .,•. •:, •:..: . - . , - • : sf':;•,.1.:,1 .s. . . •• • . .."?..3,.zsi.l...,• '.:!.:....4,S...• .. • • '-'• •......:'. s'. '..f,,•1.1., . ...if•';',...",.e. : .. ",k..A.,,,,.,.. !. 74 . .. .,';,e,..i.l.. • :•::!..,'•:1;••t•,:.•: . . .. • . • . . . • '4'..gif• '1 .•• • • • ...• . r.,?:.2'.;,••. . : •-..'.i, - .. ,:.;. .f-ii,.7.,:g• • ,..-.::.,. .., •. .: ,. . ..- . .. . . . . . .,,..,..... . . • .,, ...:,. ,1.,,,6.,,.... • .• ..-••'. '• -.. .,..i ... .. 2,;;,2.,:.i:t.. . . . . ,... , ...,;•.,,,,,.. ' • , • ,r.,,.., • . ...li!„.., ,::::::,.....,:. .. . •• .1,..,4..A. . . • • . . . . :0.1.e.'..' ..' :1.? .. . .,.. . . . '•' '. 3.i'l.'•11' t. ',•• . .• •:. i::. .. . . •;.r . ,i1...'. . g'..;1,:l'is • . 3..:;',1'.U,'.: . • . .'. '..'.Li :*;••*,*:;::: • .• • . ,....,„ : P. 1, . 3 4 . , •4•••-.!..!A. ' •::' :• .• . , ..'.;'•* . ..,r:.+-,s;;;.1" . . . . .. . ;•:,:*.f.C$*;1' ..' .. . . .. ,:-e'•i,•::, • : . •••;:••:'!f•;•. . . . ; . . . ' •,;fi':.:-, . ., • -•' ... ,• *••- •".•?::4.i.,*;*,....%; ..; •• .... • i*,..1• ;':0•',': ; ' . :.?• • '...• •*: •*: ,....,'Wvily:11• .;', . * :". '•••;• ;1•9'.1,,•& • . • • •,.. s;.1•1'N'''•'• • .. • • '•••• •'. •, '.., ". .; • .;1',e''1:3'''.:Ei'..%..,.'',. •• •:' ...• '.: ;'. ': •'4f.',A":; • .,,m,•,..1.:,:'. ''• •:', • • , ,.•,•: f"•...T.,. .,...•' • • : , '1:•.,•',' • :- '1''..'.4.••.': . ,• . .. . , 17 , - . .'ti';'3;.:',..i. . • . . 4,..411 . S . • • • . 4.1.4, . .,:,,,, i. ,t,..;;,..4-,• • . . •,..,. . • . ,.. . . „: .. ..1,..,..f.,,,,•: .. :; :..-,-. • ,- , ....i......, . .4..,....1.: : • • . 1.• . . . :.,.. • • ,.1.,,,, . „., ,..,..„,., • • • • ..,?.....,.,,,, . • ..:•1: ' • - . .. • , " ..:••• ,..41,,,s,: . .,.:... , .. • •....•• . • .:..t...!.fd: . . • . •• : • • ,...• ,..••• . .. .. ... ,'...- .• ::-..t,,,..:,,,... ... :......, •• • ,:.. • •,,..e..,....1/4•• . •• , ..,,,,7,•. ;• .. ..,..,:••• ••-: ,• ,...... ••• "• .,..,,,,• , . ..••••• : . : .. . :„....,,,,...a..: •• . • ,,,..i.•. . • ....1.,,,p.,,f,:.-,.. .. • ; ...-,'; .. : - ,• . ' .,,,,,tei• ... ••• •••••... . • ... • ‘.. • • . . • i....s....:,.,,,•;..„ • :: : ....!::::.. ,. • ,.).,.'..!... • •'`..V•;:;*•3*,' • •• • ,•*' • • ;;•‘• • ... • • • • • •.:1`.;.1" ,., •: ;,:',.;;;4,1., •:'; .f. ):: •,• i 'j;:;:. : ' -'''":'•...•.1 : •• :::•''': •• •;,• • ' - ; •,.....,i17 .. ' • ;:'• .;;;;I!...',0,i,1,::.::, .;•4.. ..•••••••.;;;;',-•.!.•'-,,*:',—;*:,: ; • : •:•*-4.',fi;** • .;-. .*'' •?...:,*f..* ;'••:;•• •1 — -.•. • • . ' ;";c::' • . .- ';'tii:',37.'.'1'., -... . . •':',-. ': :.';'• ., . .:. .• • . '....?:C.P.,1,'Y':''' '' • ::''''' ' . ••.'‘;. '.•;'''l DUPLICATE RECEIF'T DUPLICATE REC:EIF'T • . . . .. • . .*Ii.P.'.'; ,* ••*i,. .:,',4;e„i,-.fz,.. : - . ..• .•• :•... .• 1 - - '---- ••. .,o,i .i, ....•• ., -, . '...••••,.• • ::...• :i CITY OF RENTOlq • . ' '..; ''''....:• . . CITY TREASURER •----••• ' • • . . • • ..i.1.f.J.;:i:ii'-: • .. • c•• • • • -'1,;,,,'•?-•;;.''.•;.• '•. ,*. • • ,i.'.. •:• . . , • . •••:„ ...i,. . • ' ' ..• '' ''''' ''''' ' ' :/....-••• ' •; ''';' 1 REG/RCPT : 112-12841) 11-28-1990 . . • . ' . ..;• 4.!'..1',-: • ' :• . :, . -•••• !.1 CASHIER ID : C 4:4.6 P Ill ......._............._ . . . . • . , • . • s. ;•'•:';-• • - __ -- . .. . • . - : ' ...;14,.ii 4,,,,',. ;,',..,'. ,. ...f.I.,!,:'• .• '..-.,• •••• 8000 11 I SC:ELLANEOLIS RE $88.00 . . . . • . .';':::.'4.1.i';-:*''•.. f*-'' '•'''.'`:-'s•• • ' ''''''' ''.ii ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FEES .. • . . * .•,..1,,..1?,.• ,A.••.• ... .• ••;,.:.-..,-.• •••: • i; - - --- 1311U 111111 111i rill in-1001-0 ,fli.•V'••• ''' " ';:".• • '''.'!.. ....' . . ..34...j.0 oi.... •• .. " • ' ';i(ii::)".';., •••'..' ;.;•.•'..:...,,:•;•?'.,.:' ' .....1.';',,,..'..... -'. 8000 11 IbCELL AllE0115 RE $820.00 ... .. . ,:• '.•*" .":",:i.,..s.•.i., '''..';.1.•,... 4:.:':',..•;.;"1,;.-...,..:.. ,::-.•:,;,.-•':'' ,::•••"',"• ....; SITE PLAN AF'PROVAL , • .;':'41.'4'..,;:*:_:. .f:,i.'......',2?;.;!;:i....'.;.:.,,i•?:.;•;•••• .:1 -000.000.00.345.81.00.000017 . . . •• .* *•••,!...;?1,3-:',.-‘,. .,'.....•..i.•'-',,••• • •.;-;'•• • °Aril) MISCELLANEOUS RE , .•...,•i4;i,..,,,,,:••: .•• ,..,... •L•;:,. ;!...., , ...„,:i••••.•,....J..; u.. ... • $600.00 ..., ' • ,fi,..:',...1„,1..';'...•": ''i.....'.' -:';,';',,;...., •;•....'...y,'•::-,,-i, VARIANCE FEES *• • ' * . ..:"..1- '-' iiiiil riOri rill 349 81 nn.003019 ,. . .. , ...• . ,..,•• , ...'," : • .i: • "oiY:,. ,..i,-,t!. . , ,./..;..-.,,:.::t;'• ,. ...,•••,: ,.:•••,:‘••••, s-. ••••.. 711119 DUPLICATING SERkf $3.51) , • • • ;,.• . '. • , .‘ •;:•,f''•v.:;-: '' '. ••%t.',.:13.,:L'''' ' '• ':*' :'•• •••',;;;F:'::". ' '':::;;'•''..*,•,; COF.IES I 10 X $ .35 . .; ... • •,.';::1,1•,ii'"'Y ,;:."' •'• ''''''::C/.' • ::'",;--:.••••••'.• 000.000.01).341.611.00.000024 ; . . . .. -. -0., • : : '•,..•.;•NI.,;,(1.;k,, .•• . ,:;c•••:•.... ,•,-.; ,. . 17-... .... 71..15S POSTAGE $17.50 4r14l . • .f-•''•:''''....:•!",-!•; '' • • 'I `:. •• '-'•-•''.;‘' • • c. - i- -o c• ,-rici fi19 90 4-1 000001 .• ,. .. . , -..,,;,L5.,,,, . . . - ___ • • • ;••.••14 '- • "'..k•••••'',,.. .3....,•'••••':i - •.••....;,.r.••,.: .:.'..i ., .1.0TAL DUE $1 t 529.00 - ;.,..',;i9,...v..:, ••..• .. -.•••'••,i*,,.!;•:.,••:`•.'*,•,';' • •'' RECEIVED FROM: • • . ,,,..'p•-.0.,,i. ) • • •,:' •,!.. ... • 1,.,3;f• •.:.; ED GOPIZAL.EZ ." : ,•••,..., .70,;,... '..i , '-...,.•:s :::.;'../.:•. • •,:.',.;;';',.e. .- . • lf.c•- :."..' ..4.: :'.2•?•';;.*` , ',.•••••,',:,' ".t '.'".• .''....'...-• :-4......-; ,•'.,..,,.• .:....‘..:‘..,.,..i.:.:::.....:,,,-,.... ,,, . • CHECK . ' . '''' ;,r".", .:.• .'''':'",.' :'..i. ... ' $1I 529 00 ., . .,..,•i.ti;,'• • . ,• - —- $1.t 529.00 • ;••••c)g,.-.4.'. : : • •••;....'..,....,•.':•#,.;."..0.'."`,1•;-:•••,f.*.,`.. :•'.-:, TOTAL TENDERED . .. . . . ' * • .,,.--• .• ..-. ..,.. :.‘-,:•.2: .;;...;;.••:,. 4.. ___...__._______._ i....; ; .;•-••••„ % .•;:,",••;1. • ..;. .. -;;. :*;••••••;.t,:--*;'.• • - . - - .s•: ;12.-1.;' ,..,..:"' '-•,•",:-:....%-,•.,.:;,:. ,...;;.;•';',,,......:?, CHANGE DUE $0.00 •' :.•''1. !..•lt,.;::;,:;. i....,.:.:•••;‘J.:•;•,,,.,:.. .',:..-;••.:•... ....,), • is 4 •• •••'''.:r'••F,•!...;•." P•'•.:.. ; •.'<::,.q.:; 1 , . .t,• . ,'.... •,, • . . . ••.. !•;',.:•":.:i4••'. :••• . ';•';;ii••••-,i'U;',..•..- •••. •••••:•'',-.1.;:.•;•:;;.:,.;•••.. ;• ..':.,...:•:,,......11 .- ------ . : . ..•;'.1.4q''''!'-'''''I''..I: .'''''4.:'• '' •4'''''" ..id DUPL IC:ATE RECEIPT DUPLICATE REC:EIF'T •.?:,,,,i: ......•.;;•;.-;-.••• ...', -,..!.... ....•••..,:,.: .- .; .. . • • ..'• •.•••.;!:•.,...-qiti$45.,t.r:.!.'C*...:''.•..•,'!,;;,..;;..T•;:.:;:f..,i,:::!..!.....!..:...,n .. ,.....:;;P.•,..,:si .:. . . ,,.., .. •.:., .: •.: ,..,,,..i... • . .. -..„. ., • ,-,•:,v...::4t••••••••:;:• ,........ i•• ••••.., ,, ,,...:.::,.,•,...;,..... , ,,,... ., , .:.••••": .! . :. .,.-.,,,,•,:,•,,q ". ,..- :.:•••,i.,:-.•.v..,.•••••,..:,...:.;,..,,‘'•••1;:,1,•,.. .",71',.•;••. .,,i,•,';,‘::, :1-:.,:1;;••••!•.;,•.,..‘,,.,r.:'.."1-"‘17.,;%':',77:77i`'-':-;.—I'1 fl•.,",q:-..7'..;..'',•'14.4,...,'; • . .... '-.." ',,. :. :,.-:;-. . • .,••.. - . ';'!.,*;4,-, . ' ''''''''':', i)....,...`•'•..'-''4'.''.•••'."'•. .*.•'••r,p;-,..•;-.',•.,:.'•,,,•''::•'-f.,.•,'.,.,-.,::',,...,L::,j••,,'.••.:-,.7,.4:i•.,t,,i•i,,t`ii,y':,i..-,:i.•,; .'..f4p1,•,t',1A.,,/-,.-1,;;,-1..,.1,-.',..,,,.......-:•.•,.;.,:.::••,-!ii.•.t,•.•or-:,u;:'•,::!:.:.:.,,.,'...:.••,.•..z'.,',,,..i:'.•;i.'„:'.:;.'.1..;.1''•, V,;,c.;k.:;'.fT•1,..l,,t',-,:fi';,...,,',',-.;'.-,....>,4:,.,..,',.•1''--f',•.,:.;'41:.,.''*,;;i;1‘;,.':::,",',-:.,•'-•.)i'-!;,-'•..!Ft4:.i‘I,:.,i::.;,'.:'..:•',.:'•••-';,•:•.•:;'•':',;;•g.;'''.4.1!,.''r....',''..'f.i,..r.'-..t,i,sii:.;;••,...''‘..:'..••'..-.-.•;.:.:..•''•••'.•.::e•:V,i').;,''1"i''.!.,3..P',4,14,•,;,14,4/;'''it.17'':7'S':..4,•f';')•.•1'";,,,'''q:;'1..,i‘1:e-S',:,.,i,:.S','.!'•;'.','1.,1.''•..1•••.::.'.,''•i'•.'',qlj.•...••..i:i••-!e''',.;,''.;'t'`,';•''.'•;^if!I!I4.tiii',,';,4,,,.:•?%'.';..,,'.•,!..:.1•,.::','.•.:...%';•:'.:.,'';"''i4'..••i••.',!1"!1.-.Y;.';A..')c1'.;',A I•'.'i.!':'",'..,,.',:,.'•,'•,.17•'r;:••i:.7,,,.;t1,'.,'r)'..i•':I.'%,,'',-l'.'•.•'.'.,,'?,''.e.r;....'.)•.,:''',',;•,„',•I..•,,.•.'I‘•••,'..;..'-,;.'•,,a-.r••'„•,''.,?•';;.'•.''..•.1:'.;3'':,'•.,4.1,y1,..4!11ti;,1,'ie'!'.'-.:1 f;g.:;4:-l:',,:./t•:'s,,i'-ls,;',...;,'.:'....'•;:;.:''•:•'..,‘'•'.•,:-..,1.;1:,•'...':•.:•,4:'',::•'.',:'•,;..•:••,,• . :••••••:,•,'.',:;,.4,,i,•.,,•;-..,'.•'..• ''':•,.,.;.,''..J•,.?.'•:.••...'':••`•t-.i••'..'.•... ...*•,.,'•'..'',., • .....•.•'-..-'r..:'.‘,..'.•,.,•.',t...;,'•,1-•,,•r.::',,".x:••...•','P;;fV,f.,::;•,1.r ,_.'.''..••" '... • !',I,.'"';.,..' .•, . . ....,,. , ,..-, .— • . ••,,•.. • ,,, •-, . • . .• .,,,....... , ...;,:,••••,,-iv,, ,i.::,,,,,.,•.),..,.:ii., ,, :,..,se,•,.,.V.:.;i,..f,,,,.:, ........,,,,, .:C:,,:. . III ,,,,,,,i.:1,,•;,,/•-','.....:,:e'..."..-:', .'-,,r•.,•••,..',.:4.:• : ..,i?' '-f. tk?.",,, ' 'z.:, ''' •:'', ' ' •'' i - •• IT.:1; • . 1 PLANNING & ZONING FEES NAME: VI) C"�C��L'LPcueY — PROJECT: fr(..7( cee, R 1C .Revenue. Account Amount ' Trancode Annexation Fees 000/000/345.81.00.02 Appeals & Waivers 000/000/345.81.00.03 Binding Site Plan/Short Plat 000/000/345.81.00.04 Comprehensive Plan Amendment 000/000/345.81.00.05 Conditional Use Fees 000/000/345.81.00.06 Environmental Review Fees 000/000/345.81.00.07 5e DO Preliminary Plat 000/000/345.81.00.08 50% Final Plat (General Fund) 000/000/345.81.00.09 50% Final Plat (Park Fund) 101/000/345.81.00.00 Final/Preliminary PUD 000/000/345.81.00.10 Grading & Filling Fees 000/000/345.81.00.11 Lot Line Adjustment 000/000/345.81.00.12 Mobile Home Parks 000/000/345.81.00.13 Rezone 000/000/345.81.00.14 Routine Vegetation Mgmt Fees 000/000/345.81.00.15 Shoreline Substantial Dev Fees 000/000/345.81.00.16 Site Plan Approval 000/000/345.81.00.17 P 20 Special/Temporary Review Fees 000/000/345.81.00. 18 Variance Fees 000/000/345.81.00.19 C000,(70 Other Misc Planning/Zoning Fees 000/000/345.81.00.20 Maps 000/000/341.50.00.00 7041 Photo Copies //; x 10 000/000/341.60.00.24 Publications T 000/000/341.60.00.24 �' � Postage 10 g)4 000/000/05/519/90.42.01 173-0 7055 Sales Tax 000/000/231.70.00.00 9998 BY: k\) DATE: 1 ifei ° " DEPARTML:. ; OF PLANNING/BUILDING/': LIC WORKS ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEEF ooR�vIsoN �oN AttIR REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: 2. 1992„ DATE CIRCULATED: 03/25/92 COMMENTS DUE: 047 & . APPLICATION NO: ECF;SA;V-150-90 PROPONENT: ED GONZALES PROJECT TITLE: ALEXANDER PLACE PROJECT MANAGER: LENORA BLAUMAN (6168) BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: THE APPLICANT IS SEEKING: (1) SITE PLAN APPROVAL FOR A 6-UNIT MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL COMPLEX; (2) A VARIANCE FROM SETBACK REQUIREMENTS FOR BURNETT AVENUE AND SMITHERS AVENUE. THIS PROJECT WAS INITIALLY SUBMITTED AND REVIEWED IN 1990; RECOMMENDATIONS. FOR MODIFICATIONS WERE MADE AT THAT TIME. REVISIONS HAVE BEEN SUBMITTED AT THIS TIME -- COPIES OF NEW PLANS AND YOUR ORIGINAL COMMENTS .ARE PROVIDED FOR YOUR INFORMATION. LOCATION: 633 BURNETT AVENUE SITE AREA: BUILDING AREA (gross): IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS: PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPARTI IMPACT •NECESSARY 1. Earth v 2. Air 3. Water 4. Plants 5. Animals 6. Energy & Natural Resources 7. Environmental Health 8. Land & Shoreline Use• I/ 9. Housing 10. Aesthetics V 11. Light & Glare 12. Recreation J 13. Historic & Cultural Preservation 14. Transportation 15. Public Services 16. Utilities envrvsht Rev.12/91 COMMENTS: !� • • • • • We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise, and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. - 4° /7,2' Signature of Director or Auto ' d Representative Date envrvsht Rev.12/91 • "", DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET 'APPLICATION NO: ECF;SA;V-150-90 PROPONENT: Ed Gonzales PROJECT TITLE: Alexander Place PROJECT MANAGER: Lenora Blauman (6168) BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The applicant is seeking: (1) site plan approval for a 6-unit multi-family residential complex; (2) a variance from setback requirements for Burnett Avenue and Smithers Avenue. This project was initially submitted and reviewed in-1990; recommendations for modifications were made at that time. Revisions have been submitted at this time -- copies of new plans and your original comments are provided for your information. LOCATION: SEC: 17, 18, 19 & 20 TWNSHP: 23N RNG: 5E • 633 Burnett Avenue TO: PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION SCHEDULED TAC DATE: 04/07/92 ENGINEERING SECTION • TRAFFIC ENGINEERING SECTION UTILITIES ENGINEERING SECTION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION CONSTRUCTION FIELD SERVICES DEVELOPMENT PLANNING PLANNING & TECHNICAL.SERVICES PARKS & RECREATION DIVISION OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE DEVELOPMENT PLANNING SECTION BY 5:00 PM ON APRIL 2, 1992. ALEXANDER PLACE PAGE 2 I .. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: /' 2%�, F.Si�,p� APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED G "�! �'� liLler2 / GGIC��rC GG��S 27c� . 1/a r(q e e— .�///l yd eeG4c, e-- ' ,t4cieet • /7. DATE: 6/2 SIGNATURE OF DIRE TOR O*THORIZED REPRESENTATIVE devrvsht Rev.3/92 �/' ^ROPERTY MANAGEMENT FEE REVIEW /cb —9'0 ✓/ DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Q PLAN REVIEW ROUTING SLIP LLB ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET El OTHER APPLICANT: JOB ADDRESS: 7/35 — j -fit<z tr e - L . NATURE OF WORK: L1 t(t4? 1--t DATE RECEIVED BY RECEIVED FROM COMMENTS DUE WO# PRO ERTY MGMT. Q 3// r1 Frf/! ,t ; N • /12i GREEN # gr/FEES APPLIED? t. ` Q NEED MORE INFORMATION CI LEGAL DESCRIPTION Ca NOT APPROVED FOR�-J 0 FRONT FOOTAGE SQUARE FOOTAGE " APPLICATION OF FEES e-el--SA.2 ---t• -CCL 7' 1' 0 VICINITY MAP Q OTHER It is the intent of this development fee analysis to put the developer/owner on notice,that the fees quoted below will apply to the subject site upon development of the property. All quoted fees are due and payable at the time the construction permit is issued to install the on-site and off-site improvements(i.e. underground utilities, street Improvements, etc.) PRIVATE DEVELOPER HELD PROJECT COST LATECOMER LATECOMER AGREEMENT NO. PER. FTG. FEE WATER SEWER OTHER XI>-- SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT FTG. SAD FEE 10 �v� WATER _ l a 1 SEWER OTHER ( ,,,4.1./1A;v11/sA:1).;PV SPECIAL UTILITY CONNECTION CHARGE-WATER UNITS SUCC FEE Single family residential dwelling unit$940/lot x Apartment, Condo, each multiplex unit$545/ea. unit x Lp ',g, a7o. OD Commercial/!ndustrial$.126/sq.ft. of property x (not less than $940.00) SPECIAL UTILITY CONNECTION CHARGE-SEWER UNITS SUCC FEE Single family residential dwelling unit$470/lot x Apartment, Condo, each multiplex unit$270/ea. unit x 1Q r / 63. 0.DO 1 Commercial/Industrial $.063/sq.ft. of property x (not less than $470.00) TOTAL: $ 41 ii The above quoted fees do NOT include inspection fees,side sewer permits, r/w permit f els or a cost of water meter z b'4 18c30S- gDZP/ 41 6 N. /)1V M O 3///91 Signature of Director or Authorized Repre ntative DATE wft.a..n/,..r/�Yr/1»1/M I/