Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
LUA85-100
'EVERGREEN TREE STAKING DETAIL • TREE STAKING DETAIL' :r::+'v.Y+i �d►'0.c.ii i►.` ` � 'ovy�iaiiii1. , m '�nfi... -y ,_ l - If. • '! \ Alit .ram, f scrrgNXo • .1/,4�l� wW W ./ �T/ '=, � !VIOL' a 9/IEg��G P// \\\j M'KGHGS ��p/C}� /10 . V I., JILi 414 E. • •ake 11 At 0.21,,,,,,,,,,,, 1,+ e �'�� \oS" Ill,Tih• Ir ' .l m mp �,� iN Syr Or—li' 6 ,,,,,,'wr'A nroa.,e"`ety •�. I E R.avn'....,5 Mna ■ I+i ..v_� �;.y. 6Pr> .,U 9�n_17'>s'1=R'=� IiLi Soc . •i.' r.,8/LC� rGC 3�P' i. �s? zl ti ',Cc, Ncb/4V IV, so 640 a � SHRUB PLANTING DETAIL • I: h- 1 r 'ti= •. tee=�; ^� to _ _- - _ a'^. -"GOER WXER d+SiN ..4a....... �.:.+....C ,. 1.1:. i.�' T'M� } Z IAA Mir"-8RL- "-- >Rc•,- `••n �ppI 5'(XO /Zee' 4 C7 al a I 1 OER!.-�Fil 1' to GrT OG rN Ii Z I4 , E N. w Ai", M M�T Y 0 Q ' V z ilk� 4pp GENERAL NOTES CO Z a�� iL..+l1 _-0R2,,R5 >R9 9R2,,R8_aiV•1-� `\ 12+3 - II+ 6 A�YNf93 P..,wr�Naf`.,�'-t1L i'+�w �Mlih;3. • O _ _ n3+++r.�e+..+.a...oo.. -- -�, S,i.,4A .'S>'.<:Lw2i44,r.✓S-A EE-NG.Q^r ftlaw -r I .+... +.et., ,:au .w.......a....aa�T i : I.iu' ,- -2'WNURRSSq 5T..,,,G,+1 s 2.7 rn'- r•e, ue z RAyT cF9ice Giaw OT�19K',,,vliB_ /, n --i.y __ _ __. �.tRB 9R/,/Rj - �i I' .05„,57/r4Tg /,P. E,a,L.A. - i;.aRc,mee _,.c, e 7S. . _ ./T1, '�' .� , a:7er,-r F.a�.,�_=-✓.e.1 e_rvvmw:�r-..vv •11 _ 1Y'�7V>R i��, W N^T9S� W /,.C.�J ,WwM.iY,9.L;-e ms/, /� per} .5-rv.,Gs.,FE_SM.t,, ,,�/42'1,4,1:uO.9�:..a W J . L 5 _ alb,:.. $ E 9e-Y.,s,:,,,!_ wY.�c9Tcf5,,,.� /'}��,ram 1 *1ne' 0 ° s`,..r'c,,,,,▪ r sne,,e a .:.v.,;.//9 J I f I {\-�-V{T-^\lgll/ I f[�/}j'�/,J -R4 Z It F/w1:Es,..,K01. ▪i4tc'J Rom.=. o A, : ' I y • ,- , ` .. Y+ e I ' ,r- PLANT LIST W ,y :Y �; 0 pi Ts. ,. (. _ i��-3Re sR3 •Y__7 ,�+�.` ` a�TiLvrCX,'Ca7rew.�y^4e __ _- a m W `2 8Rg , rw,wus,,,,,EY, 'tc. P/A e+,CE s V"Cev-,e,a c >R8 F NV3 i ;fir 1- 4i+ girl" .�E,45 ,"uM i¢50 SUN9GT, :,^S'G[.6+B V [1 JQI „1, r�l !F_•et R=/w^,F:ow�i.v�S,PG H ^-ass"GK B!6 LL J7f ��dglto y, ;. Mk .+11 0 677.,'1R5/ 77,'P/NC 6'B.9,'B c� ,5'OeL...41/O�w GEnVv (o'B"JJG vlu�o • M:rI p - _-_ • + M ec tiCss ie /r wcmw e'rw e! RovU6 rGm_rN55/», fE-wr/i'-s.GAL al9 e rI - b-I ` ' ,¢ rs .n•r 's ,1+ , aZ9 +la+�3r.> R a / 'e'a1/-'" rei'H'-.•r ENrhv'C9 • ilk RZ R^DGbCENR%V (ILLM�Xi'HN. 5 • .�' I J I s{{ - � • ` S •.y:rIR./R3 el. ry JbL YGiT1 � aHv `�li4R_,/R8 8r42^- ' '.or' :AI�. / /N,� � t il -- ( �' • GM •VGVRUn r-,S 9RwNG Gb OUGT Zq' /. e� 'A � 0 _ }�+ //1�T//�t✓�/ n P/ MN.x'M(4/M 'r'lJ�/NE 3H 1G. NIq s ..eea rr.o-eR,Msw,v evTRweee C J N�„�•+C P wD W�E/v�uO,SUUNG9 :C-NL • I I , ,• lien r2ux a.a,74.a'/.e+cr6,Al"•f'ro,s ra',7, Z AN• - - __ _ - ,5✓/NN PM9E,W/,855,,,..LGo,.9G'M/N . W ASgH 0 �y 1,/ y __ -___-- __ __- S,W, 99d S1I4EEl [Vf-JY�%Y.d~'] � CO SITE PLAN Jau ,•W.. 0 L7N t KLA ea ..d,. I _i .. C • O Q ® ® O Q • Q O ,,... ,v. Imo.- ae , ,�. , >. ,"e.. , �n. ,.. ", _ —, Tom . — .—_T — ...0 ,I _:iL___±4 , -:, -,-„--,,,,_,„...----,: +H---- --+' . . . _-. , „‘ _ & .. ., , co, . —ry L o ± . li Ha-- i ._11_71H 1 �V oFp.ic.e n_ C eC e ao.N J • C O�Y �u o— � -� c\C oA _ I u_ x>ic c o IT W i •i.00Y _L_____ , ° 1W 1 H--—1-1 — ,_,-4- l' 1 . ++---d- . , > _ 1 1 ■ I_ 11 HdH GrRoUH Q rLa.., f L>^/ I .... . . . _ _______ . �' I tsTAT I s?I G 5 ~- I � Y.we. Inv GGGu/.LN GY g•1. / •ft i7,.01lON9TRUGToh�< M hIWVKIxrzeL flTd ,..RaA. Do,..a4.... t,,•..:c.e) + -- I.FK�u.�FWiriTL�•T�i R�Ti6.L..'11i., ...(I/,c.w.qe f!) ..??' Z. del • • _:_ , .. , _ ,p„ ... e / I—————I'''' // //4":11"l' B_ r r-—-- — :I • isrl/ " l • - I i �-, kr i I , o `< �1 C� I1. ' ir% .. Q G12d.5-bec Tto.� Ill 4 111—. kill .\ prr *•.alir I I • 0 m r I \\ ..e,: ,.••••arrat.to.• I I \ i L g l. I. I I [_ 3< t I E-- ate.r..-,..n m.o. • $3 - Alit f 1.ylfrJK.Fl"q 0-...)—) a r..- .�- - . �. N =:. < =—o SW• b.ITH 4TIZFcT • r11 I\x- s?e PLs►.rJ . A-I ,...,.. , . . . .. I BEGINNING . OF FILE , . . . . . , . . , . .. . . , FILE TITLE MICROFILMED . . , .. ;, ,,,,,,. / ,. . , . . i.,., . ... , .4 i . 1, ,,i,,../0 al S • 4.. , x i:-- , 41 # ó ICO . Public N Public Notice NOTICE OF ENVIR NTAL PANY(ECF-113-85) DETERMINATION Application for substantial shorelines ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW development permit to allow the construc- COMMITTEE Lion of a swimming pool for the residence of RENTON, WASHINGTON Frank Lee,file number SM-012-85;located The Environmental Review Committee along the shoreline of Lake Washington a' (ERC) has issued a declaration of non- 5121 Ripley Lane North. significance for the following projects: ACKERLEY COMMUNICATIONS, INC RAMAC,INCORPORATED(ECF-095-85) ECF-089-85) • Application for conditional use permit to Application to allow for the constructior AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLI( a;low the construction of a one and two of a single faced, off-premise locsec story self-storage building having 30,850 sign measuring 12 feet by 25 feet;locates square feet of area to be located in a B-1 on the north side of Bronson Way North or zoned district, file number CU-062-85; the Burlington Northern right-of-way bet. tiudre DeJoie located at the 100 block of Bronson Way ween Factory Avenue North and Sunsel being first duly Sworn N.E. (east of 1-405 and north of Maple Boulevard North (letter attached). he/she is the Chief Clerk of the Valley Highway). GLACIER PARK CO. (ECF-109-85) CHARLES HENDERSON (ECF-106-85) Application for site plan approval for Application to rezone 30.99 acres from Arby's Restaurant and a short plat of two G-1 to R-1, file number R-080-85, and lots and one track for roadway purposes, VALLEYNEWSPAP application for preliminary plat approval to file number SA-083-85; property located subdivide said property into 126 single east side of West Valley Road at the 270C block. Daily News Journal, Daily Record Chronicle, D family lots into a plat to be known asFurther information regarding this action "Sunset Trails," file number PP-081-85; is available in the Building and Zoning Daily newspapers published six (6) times a week. ' located on the east side of Duvall Avenue Department, Municipal Building, Renton, N.E. at the 2200-2300 block. Washington, 235-2550. Any appeal 01 are legal newspapers and are now and have bec CHEVRON, U.S.A., INC. (ECF-117-85) ERC action must be filed with the Renton months prior to the date of publication referred to,1 Application for conditional use permit Hearing Examiner by December 23, 1985. in the English language continually as daily news and site plan approval to allow the expan- Published in the Daily Record Chronicle sion of an existing service station by December 9, 1985. R1256 County, Washington. Valley Newspapers have be removing the existing pump islands and - newspapers by order of the Superior Court of the St canopy and installing a new, larger pump island and canopy facility incorporating a King County. mini-mart building, file numbers CU-097- 85 and SA-098-85; located at 1419 North 30th Street. The notice in the exact form attached, was publish ORILLIA PROPERTY ASSOCIATES, LI- Journal , Daily Record Chronicle , Daily C MITED PARTNERSHIP (ECF-119-85) Application for site plan approval to allow not in supplement form) which was regularl; the construction of three, two-story office subscribers during the below stated period. TI buildings totaling 120,000 square feet on an 11.74 acre site,file number SA-100-85; -J o Lice of Environmental Deterrt11fla located at the northwest corner of Lind on Leceiiiber 9, 1985 R1256 Avenue S.W. and S.W. 39th Street. EVERGREEN SPA AND POOL COM- E - • The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of $56.4 3 • Subscribed and sworn to before me this 12 th day of Dee 19 8. . Notary Public for the State of Washington, residing at Federal Way, CITY OF RENTO11 King County, Washington. � ,:� i fir; 1 I r; VN#87 Revised 10:84 (� [ • JAN 20 ►936 BUILDING/ZONING DEFT NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION RENTON LAND• USE HEARING EXAMINER RENTON, WASHINGTON A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY Audrey DeJoie , being first duly sworn on oath states that THE RENTON LAND USE HEARING he/she is the Chief Clerk of the EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING. IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS ON THE SECOND FLOOR OF CITY HALL, RE- NTON, WASHINGTON ON JANUARY 7, VALLEY NEWSPAPERS 1986, AT 9:00 A.M. TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS: ORILLIA PROPERTY ASSOCIATES, Daily News Journal, Daily Record Chronicle, Daily Globe News LIMITED PARTNERSHIP • Application for site plan approval to allow Daily newspapers published six (6) times a week.That said newspapers the construction of three, two-story office buildings totaling 120,000 square feet on a are legal newspapers and are now and have been for more than six 11.74 acre site, file number SA-100-85; months prior to the date of publication referred to,printed and published located at the northwest corner of Lind in the English language continually as daily newspapers in Kent, King AvenueCHES.W. USA,nd S.W.INC. Street. Count Washington. ValleyNewspapers have been approvedCHEVRON, . Y, g as legal Application for conditional use permit and newspapers by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for site plan approval to allow the expansion of King County. an existing service station by removing the existing pump islands and canopy and installing a new, larger pump island and canopy facility incorporating a mini mart The notice in the exact form attached, was published in the Daily News building,file numbers CU-097-85 and SA- Journal , Daily Record Chronicle Daily Globe News (and 09 Legall located at ns of the tie Street. , descriptions the files noted not in supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its above are on file in the Renton Building and , subscribers during the below stated period. The annexed notice a Zoning Department. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID i o t i c e of Public rie o ri n6 was published PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRE- SENT AT THE PUBLIC HEARING ON on December 20, 19d5 R1278 JANUARY 7, 1986, AT 9:00 A.M. TO EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS. Ronald G. Nelson Building and Zoning Director PUBLISHED in the Daily Record Chroni- The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the cle December 20, 1985. R1278. sum of $ 2 9.7 0 . Subscribed and sworn to before me this 24th day of Dec 19 85 / /` • Notary Public for the State of Washington, residing at Federal Way, King County, Washington. VN#87 Revised 10/84 • IzI278 14 - 1 040--S �.• P NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ?, RENTON LAND USE HEARIN.0 t '' EXAMINER ` 'RENTON,WASHINGTON '• A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD B& THE RENTON LAND USA ,kIEARINC AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUCIL CHAMBERS ON THE Audrey De JO i e SECOND FLOOR OF CITY HALL, RE,. , being first duly sworn on oath states that NTON,WASHINGTON ON JANUARY 14, he/she is the Chief Clerk of the ' 1986, AT 9:00 A.M. TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PETITION: ORILLIA PROPERTY AS- • SOCIATES,LIMITED PARTNERSHIP ': fi, Application for site plan approval to ., LEY NEWSPAPERS rj, allow the construction of three, two- I Daily News Journal, Daily Record Chronicle, Daily Globe News square fee on an buildings11.74 acre site,file number SA-100-85; located `at the Daily newspapers published six(6) times a week.That said newspapers northwest corner of Lind Avenue S.W. are legal newspapers and are now and have been for more than six I Legal and s.d s street. escrr iptions of the files noted months prior to the date of publication referred to,printed and published above are on file in the Renton Building in the English language continually as daily newspapers in Kent, King s Zoning Department.' ° • ' ALL INTERESTED PERSONS $AILS County, Washington. Valley Newspapers have been approved as legal PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PREP newspapers by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for SENT AT THE PUBLIC HEARING ON King County. JANUARY 14,'1986, AT 9:00 A.M. TO EXPRErSS THEIR OPINIONS. '' • Ronald G. Nelson` Building and Zoning Director' The notice in the exact form attached, was published in the Daily News Published in the Daily Record �foniC�� Journal—, Daily Record Chronicle X , Daily Globe News , (and January 3, 1986. Rlg9,4 • 0) not in supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers during the below stated period. The annexed notice a Notice of Public Hearing was published on January 3, 1986 R1294 The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of$ 23.76 Subscribed and sworn to before me this 9th day of Jan 19 86 ,L.-C7 Notary Public for the State of Washington, residing at Federal Way, King County, Washington. VN#87 Revised 10/84 I �; -,& -tc- NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION RENTON,WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a declaration of non- significance for the following project: Audrey DeJoie being first duly sworn on oath states that FANCHER FLYWAYS(ECF-121-85) Application for conditional use permit to he/she is the Chief Clerk of the allow the construction cf two aircraft hangar buildings having approximately 6,720 square feet and 4,500 square feet VALLEY NEWSPAPERS respectively to house 7 aircraft in a P-1 zoned district, file number CU-103-85; property located at 243 West Perimeter Daily News Journal, Daily Record Chronicle, Daily Globe News Road on the Renton Municipal Airport. The Environmental Review Committee Daily newspapers published six (6) times a week.That said newspapers (ERC) has issued a declaration of non- significance for the following projects with are legal newspapers and are now and have been for more than six additional conditions imposed as mitigat- months prior to the date of publication referred to,printed and published ing measures under their authority of Section 4-2822(D)of the Renton Municipal in the English language continually as daily newspapers in Kent, King Code: County, Washington. Valley Newspapers have been approved as legal BRYANT MOTORS, INC. (ECF-104-85) newspapers by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for Application to rezone 8,240 square feet of property from R-1, Single Family Resi- King County. dential,to B-1, Business Use,file number R-079-85, properly located 125 and 125 Meadow Avenue North;and application for The notice in the exact form attached, was published in the Daily News variance from Section 4-711(D)(6)to allow a reduction of required landscaping along Journal , Daily Record Chronicle %'- , Daily Globe News , (and Meadow Avenue North and North Second not in supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its Street from 10 feet to 3 feet,file number V- subscribers duringthe below statedperiod. The annexed notice a . ORILLIA PROPERTY ASSOCIATES, LI- Notice of' Environmental Determi nn tinn was published MITED PARTNERSHIP(ECF-119-85) Application for site plan approval to allow On January 13, 1986 R1313 the construction of three, two-story office buildings totaling 178,605 square feet on an 11.74 acre site,file number SA-100-85; property located at the northwest corner of Lind Avenue S.W. and S.W. 39th Street. The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the ORILLIA PROPERTY ASSOCIATES, LI- 41 •58 MITED PARTNERSHIP(ECF-124-85) sum of $ Application for site plan approval to allow • the construction of two buildings totaling 153,300 square feet of office space on the 10.48 acres of property, file number SA- �� �/�e�- 106-85;property located on the north side of S.W.39th Street at the 800 block. Further information regarding this action is available in the Building and Zoning Subscribed and sworn to before me this 15th T Department, 235-2550.M3555l Building,Any appealRe of day of �.a n 19 �6 . Washington, Any of ERC action must be filed with the Renton Hearing Examiner by January 27, 1986. � Published in the Daily Record Chronicle /� � January 13, 1986. R1313 Notat Public for the State of Washington, residing at Federal Way, King County, Washington. VN N87 Revised 1084 CITY c;. --"ON a rl� ' . 1) ';.r dy f�-1 r' h . . t 0 Li 19FF f DO NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON HEARING EXAMINER RENTON,WASHINGTON A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUN- AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION N THE SECOND FCIL LOORAOFECITYO HALL, RENTON, WASHINGTON.ON JANUARY 28, 1986, Andre AT 9:00 A.M. TO CONSIDER THE FOL- yDeJoie , being first duly sworn on oath states that LOWING PETITIONS: he/she is the Chief Clerk of the ORILLIA PROPERTY AS- SOCIATES,LIMITED PARTNERSHIP ' Application for site plan approval to allow the construction of three two- VALLEY NEWSPAPERS story office buildings totaling 178,605 • square feet on an 11.74 acre site,file f number SA-100-85; located at the Daily News Journal, Daily Record Chronicle, Daily Globe News northwest corner of Lind Avenue S.W. • and S.W. 39th Street. Daily newspapers published six (6) times a week. That said newspapers " ORILLIA PROPERTY ASSOCIATES, are legal newspapers and are now and have been for more than six LIMITED PARTNERSHIP Application for site plan approval to months prior to the date of publication referred to,printed and published allow the construction of two buildings in the English language continually as daily newspapers in Kent, King totaling 153,300 square feet of office space on 10.48 acres of property,file County, Washington. Valley Newspapers have been approved as legal newspapers by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for SA-106-85; property located on the north side of S.W.39th Street at the 800 King County. block. Legal descriptions of the files noted The notice in the exact form attached, was published in the Daily News above are on file in the Renton Building and Zoning Department. Journal , Daily Record Chronicle X , Daily Globe News , (and ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID PRE- not in supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO PR Pp g SENTTAT THE PUBLIC HEARING ON subscribers during the below stated period. The annexed notice a JANUARY 28, 1986, AT 9:00 A.M. TO EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS. Notice of Public Hearin was published Ronald G. Nelson January 17 , 1986 R1 18 Building and Zoning Director on 3 Published in the Daily Record Chronicle January 17, 1888. R1318. The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of $29.70 Subscribed and sworn to before me this 22nd day of Jan 19 �4). Not y Public for the State of Washington, residing at Federal Way, King County, Washington. VN 087 Revised 10/84 • 1213!8 ram, OF I O ,., r '. ° BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT O I h # RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR z NIL 09 co" MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH.98055 • 235-2540 094r�o s e�P E BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR • June 27. 1986 • Mr. K. L. Walker Boeing Electronics Company A Division of the Boeing Company Mail Stop 9A-63 P.O. Box 3707 Seattle, Washington 98124-2207 RE: Schedule of Installation of Traffic Mitigation/BECO PROJECT-Lind Avenue S.W. and S.W. 39 th Street. • Dear Mr. Walker: - The Environmental Review Committee reviewed your letter of June 18. 1986 at their regular meeting and accepted the modified dates for the installation of the traffic signal at S.W. 41st Street and Lind Avenue S.W. and the construction of Raymond Avenue S.W. north of S.W. 41st Street. The Building Division has been informed of the changes in the time schedule. Thank you for suppling the necessary information. For the Environmental Review Committee. Roger J. Blaylock 0 0 Zoning Administrator 1181N . RJB cc. Jim Hanson. Assistant Building Official S - / •-g5 :;T't1:14 11=t.i °r(dy;.. ii;.'"�,.Ii. it-. •• ;• •j t e r k I e y Structures Inc . 201 Elliott Ave.W#407•Seattle,Washington 98119•(206)281-8252 7.LL:.. ..u..11:..1_1..a.L.L�1A.._1....1.:.�..._.....__.....:..�.:.11.t:.. 1._:....,_.........-. 24 February, 1986 REVISION 1 HAND CARRY • ON.01" RENTON • Roger J. Blaylock P Environmental Review Committee ! i. :e ! 9 City of Renton � , ,1 R Building Department L. �, FEB 2 41986 Municipal Building 200 Mill Avenue South BUILDING/ZONING DEPT. Renton, Washington 98055 • Re: Boeing Electronics Company, S.W. 39th St. and Lind Ave. , Renton, WA Dear Roger: Berkley Structures, Inc. proposes to install four (4) street lights to fulfill the requirement of the Environmental Review Committee as part of the Determination of Non-Significance. 1. The light at S.W. 39th Street and Lind Avenue is to be included in the street widening improvement up to the cost of $182,000.00. . 2. The three remaining street lights are to be installed in the local vicinity of the site per the direction of the Environmental Review • Committee up to the cost of $130,000.00 each. Berkley will place the street lights according to the Environmental Review Committee's schedule. 3. If, after completion of the area.wide circulation study, it is determined that the cost was less than $175.00 per trip, Berkley Structures, Inc. will receive a credit in that amount. In addition, Berkley Structures, Inc. will provide a performance bond for the above work so the Building Department may release the building permit. Sincerely, Douglas N. Gardner Project Manager DNG/jc tc • CONTRACT NO. BECo(FAC) 86-1 FOR TRAFFIC SIGNAL SW 41st STREET and LIND AVENUE RENTON, WASHINGTON THIS CONTRACT made this /o day of c Al,,r , '19.8e, by and between BOEING ELECTRONICS COMPANY, a division of The Boeing Company., a Delaware Corporation. with offices at 625 Andover Park West, Tukwila, Washington, 98188 - (hereinafter referred 'to-. as "Boeing") and ?rer 41teo>.r.e 'oj Toe.-y-! 2rdhereinafter referred to - as "Contractor") . WITNESSETH - WHEREAS, Boeing desires the accomplishment of the work called for herein and, WHEREAS, Contractor represents that he has- the experience and ability to perform such work, NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the agreements - contained herein Boeing and contractor hereby agree as follows: Clause 1. Contract Documents The following documents are by this reference made a part of this contract and these documents, together with this " contract,- constitute the - entire contract and are hereinafter referred to collectively as the "contract" or the ".contract documents" : ' ' 'a. , The "Special Conditions" , attached hereto. b. • "The . Boeing Company General Conditions for Construction and Similar -Work., Fixed -Price (Rev. 6-71) " , attached hereto. c. • Annex , to "Boeing Company General -Conditions for Construction and Similar Work, Fixed Price (Rev. . 8-68) " , dated . 4-76,. attached hereto. ' - d. Revision No. ' 1 to General' Conditions for Construction. and Similar Work (11-80) ,' attached hereto. - 0 - • - e.- City of Renton Design Standards - Traffic Signals. • f. ' - SW 41st Street and Lind Avenue Drawings dated 11-85: - "Sheet 1 of 3 Cover Sheet . ' al" Sheet 2 of 3 • Plan Sheet �f, 11/7 Sheet 3 of 3 ' Wiring Schematic. f ' f ':4w ly i u 1 JUN18 ] j n10/FPC861 Page986 EL'I OrNvi�i7lylNG U PT. Clause 2. Statement of Work Contractor agrees to furnish all labor, materials, equipment, supplies, incidentals and supervision necessary to complete a traffic signal at SW 41st Street. and. Lind Avenue per the drawings and specifications. Clause 3 . Contract Price Boeing agrees to pay the contractor at the time and in the manner provided in this contract in the amount not to exceed the - lump sum of: The amount • set forth above includes all applicable federal, state and local taxes,- except Washington State sales tax. - . IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have caused • this contract to be executed by : their respective duly authorized representatives, the day and year first, above written. BOEING ELECTRONICS COMPANY 44Ces/re. j (A Division of The Boeing Company) (Contractor) By By J. A. OHNSON Title Direct r of Facilities Title V- ,9e0J7 Date /// v Date (hr. ,0 ,9e6 - - BOEING ACCOUNTING DATA #10/FPCS61 Page 2 _ CP o BOEING ELECTRONICS COMPANY A Division of The Boeing Company M/S 9A-63 P.O.Box 3707 Seattle,Washington 98124-2207 June 18 , 1.986 9-4140-KLW-091 City of Renton Attention : Mr . Hansen • Building and Zoning Department Municipal Building 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 Dear Mr . Hansen: As requested , I am enclosing a copy of our contract with Totem Electric for the 41st Street and Lind Avenue traffic signal and the contract with R. W. Scott for the extension of Raymond Avenue . The anticipated completion schedule for the traffic signal is approximately July 15 , 1986 . The poles are scheduled to be shipped the first week of July, and the contractor will complete the installation as soon as the poles arrive . The contractor estimates that , if he does not encounter any delays due to weather , the Raymond Street extension will be.. complete by July 3 , 1986 . The above dates are approximate and depend on deliveries and weather . We are following these contracts closely to assure completion as soon as possible . If you have further questions , you can reach me on 575-5611 . Sincerely, Boeing Electronics Company /g,///4 ;lie.f. K. L . Walker KLW:bg Enclosure a� c.,CITy 0o 5.-, ' a W'e k' � d 6 o • •"1 P:3 [P7 re N 18 19 L , 86 yr CONTRACT NO. BECo(FAC) 8 ) FOR RAYMOND AVENUE SOUTHWEST EXTENSION BOEING ELECTRONICS CENTER RENTON, WASHINGTON THIS CONTRACT made this day of✓1� , 1986, by and between BOEING ELECTRONICS COMPANY, a div i ion 'of The oeing Company, a Delaware Corporation with offices at 625 Andover Park Wes �Tt���--la, W�ehinto 98188 (hereinafter referred to as "Boeing") and }' GU�)/'r� l`L�I.U.Sl, . (hereinafter referred to as "Contractor") . WITNESSETH WHEREAS, Boeing desires the accomplishment of the work called for herein and, WHEREAS, Contractor represents that he has the experience and ability to perform such work, NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the agreements contained herein Boeing and Contractor hereby agree as follows: } ria„GP 1 . Contract Documents The following documents are by this reference made a part of this contract and these documents, together with this contract, constitute the entire contract and are hereinafter referred to collectively as the "contract" or the "contract documents": a. The General and Unique Requirements, attached hereto. b. "The Boeing Company General Conditions for Construction and Similar Work, Fixed Price (Rev. 6-71)", attached hereto. c. Annex to "Boeing Company General Conditions for Construction and Similar Work, Fixed Price (Rev. 8-68)", dated 4-76, attached hereto. d. Revision No. 1 to General Conditions for Construction and Similar Work (11-80) , attached hereto. e. Raymond Avenue Southwest Extension Boeing Electronics Center and specifications. J'.1ansP 2. Statement of Work Contractor agrees to furnish all labor materials, equipment, supplies, incidentals and supervision necessary to co �`��fh' aymond Avenue Southwest Extension at the Boeing Electronics 9 tit'? / ' gs and ..) specifications. / L r JUN %819 #2BG/FPC-86-20 1 86 f _ �.� - y • " Contract Price Boeing agrees to pay the Contractor at the time and in the manner provided in this contract in the amount not o exceed the lump sum of: /C4T iee • R4-sea 0,0 4/1 it efc(s The amount set forth above includes all applicable federal, state and local taxes, except Washington State sales tax. . IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have caused this contract to be executed by their respective duly authorized representatives, the day and year first above written. - BOEING ELECTRONICS COMPANY eze)Sce),77' 6if-T. Co (A Division of The Boeing Company) actor) • yA. J S N Title Director of Facilities Title Director of Engineering And Construction Date <74 Date7 �9 (9oc4 #2BG/FPC-86-20 2 sag- too - tt, - A - I ®A,—gF OF R&t. ./ A. �� OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY • RENTON, ASHINGTON C., 4% .� POST OFFICE BOX 628 100 S 2nd STREET • RENTON, WASHINGTON 98057 255-8678 0 LAWRENCE J. WARREN, CITY ATTORNEY DANIEL KELLOGG, ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY '90 `O DAVID M. DEAN, ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY e'747.�o sEP�EV��P MARK E. BARBER, ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY ZANETTA L. FONTES, ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY March 31, 1986 MARTHA A. FRENCH,ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF r;FNTO,l T))._.1 Fp TO: ' Ron Nelson, Building & Zoning Director � `= r APR , 1p, 36 FROM: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney RE: Deferral Performance Bonds for Orillia Limited . Dear Ron: The above-referenced bonds are approved as to legal form. From previous _experience, it might be prudent henceforth to include an attorney' s fee clause if the City should find it necessary to file suit to enforce the bid or to collect upon the bond. (77..e Lawrence J. Warren LJW:nd Encl. cc: Mayor • Bond No. U55 12 97 DEFERRAL PERFORMANCE BOND DEFERRAL NO. PROJECT OWNER: Orillia Limited Partnership I • STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ss COUNTY OF KING ) KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that we Orillia Limited Partnership I , as Principal, and the • • United Pacific Insurance Co. , a corporation organized and existing under and by virtue of the laws of the State of washin_ on and authorized to transact the business of' surety in the State of Washington, as surety, are held and firmly bound unto the City of Renton, State of Washington, . in the penal sum of $125,023.50 • for payment of which, well and truly to be made, we bind ourselves and each of our heirs , executors , administrators and assigns , jointly and severally, firmly by these presents. The condition of the foregoing obligation is such that the above described principal must construct the improvements described in attached Exhibit "A" and have them accepted by the •City of Renton, on or before the 1st. day of June , 1991 . This bond is specifically given to induce the City of- Renton to defer these improvements until the above mentioned date and this bond serves -1- • • as security for the installation of those improvements . The principals of this bond agree to the following terms and conditions: Said improvements and their appurtenances thereto shall be constructed in accordance with approved plans and as per City of Renton standards and APWA standards where applicable. It is hereby expressly agreed that this bond is also given and made as a guarantee against defective materials or workmanship in the construction of said improvements , provided, however, that no suit or action or proceeding by any reason of any defect whatever , . • • shall be brought upon this bond after one year following the final acceptance of said improvements by the City. The condition of this obligation is such that if the principal shall not construct said improvements in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth herein within the time limits prescribed, then the City can make demand upon the surety to complete said improvements . If the surety declines to construct ' the improvements '•at its sole cost and expense, then the surety shall be liable under this bond for the full amount of this bond, or the actual expense necessary for the City to install said improvements , whichever sum is less . • Signed, sealed and dated this 19 day of ' •March' ' . • • • 198 6. Orillia Limited Partnership I • APP' sV D AS TO FORM: 1'rinci al AAP,' ,Lawrence J . . ren, City Gene al a tner Attorney, Cirof Renton -2- ), . . • • • • • • • • Deferral Performance Bond • • • • • Secretary • • United Pacific Insuranc Co. • , BondinCompany • *By • • Mike Amundsen • *Authorization for Attorney-In-Fact, Attached Hereto , •• , • • • , , . • • • . , • • • • AGENT: . • • • • • • Insurance & Investment Mgrs. , Inc. • 'Name P.O. Box 150903 • Address • •Seatle, WA 98119 • • • (206): 285-5533 Telephone • • • • • • • • . • • -3- • • • • ' r EXHIBIT A Participation in area wide improvements identified by a traffic and circulation study of an area bounded by South 180th on the south, SR 167 on the east, SR 181 on the west and I 405 on the north, along with the extension of Oakesdale Ave. S.E. to SR 900. The Study shall identify (1) a circulation system adequate to accommodate motor vehicle traffic locally generated in the study area at build- out office park density, (2) the total estimated cost of the system, (3) the total trip generation assocated with said office park development, (4) an esti- mate of the per trip cost of constructing the system, (5) a list of those ele- ments of the system that have already been construced or committed to by proposed development and who have or will receive credit (on a trip basis) for the cost of that construction, and (6) a prioritization of the construction pro- jects needed in the immediate future to minimize the impact of development currently being proposed in the study area. The participation shall be based upon the project°s proportionate share based upon estimated daily traffic generation as calculated by standards established in the Inistitute of Traffic Engineers Trip Generation Manual. The maximum cost shall not exceed $175.00 per trip (714 trips). Credit will be allowed to the principal for the improvement of the inter- section of S.W. 39th Street and Lind Ave. S.W. including installation of a traf- fic signal, street widening and chanelization. The Bond may be released or reduced upon the completion of the intersection improvements or upon the comple- tion of other traffic improvement within the study area constructed with the consent of the Renton Department of Public works. The amount to be credited shall be agreed upon by the principal and the Department of Public Works. This Bond is applicable to Building /® of the project known as Boeing Technical Park located on Lot 2 of the Plat Burlington Northern Industrial Park Renton II, King County, Washington. UNIT.D - FIC Cam: F 1 Y AD OFFICE.FEDERAL WAY,WASHINGTON POWER OF ATTORNEY KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS.That the UNITED PACIFIC fNSURAf4CE COMPANY,a taorb cation tsrpniaod under the Mars of the State of Weahengton,does hereby make,constitute end appoint • MIKE AMUNDSEN of SEATTLE, WASHINGTON--- ern true end lawful Attornoy•us•Foct,to make,oeocute,esol and deliver for and on its behalf,teed a.e inset and deed • ANY AND ALL BONDS AND UNDERTAKINGS OF SURETYSHIP--- end to bond the UNITED PACIFIC INSURANCE COMPANY thereby es fefly and to the sierra extant as if such bonds and undertakings and other writings obligatory on the nature thereof wore Eignod by en Executive Officer of the UNITED PACIFIC INSURANCE COMPANY and scaled and attested by one other of such officer's,and hereby ratifies and confirms all that its said Attorrsoylsl-in•Fact may do in puesueanee hereof. This Power of Attorney is granted under and by authority of Article VII of the By-Laws of UNITED PACIFIC INSURANCE COMPANY which became effective September 7,1978,avhich provisions are now in full force and effect,reading as follows. ARTICLE VII— EXECUTION OF BONDS AND UNDERTAKINGS 1. The Board of Directors.the President,the Chairman of the Board,any Senior Vice President.any Vice President or Assistant Vice President or other officer designated by the Board of Directors shall have power and authority to fal mint Attorneys•rn•Fact and to authorize them to execute on behalf of the Company.bonds and undertakings, rocognizances, contracts of indemnity and other writings obligatory+n the nature thereof,and fbi to remove any such Attorney-in-Fact at any tints and revoke the power end authority given to him. 2. Attorneys-in-Fact shall have power and authority.subject to the trims and Iimrtstions of the power of attorney*sued to them,to execute and deliver on behalf of the Company.bonds and undertakings.recognszeocss,contracts of indemnity tend other wrrtirs s obligatory in the nature thereof. The corporate seal as not necessary for the validity of any bonds and undertaking.,rocognizanoees,contracts of indemnity and other writings obligatory to the nature thereof. 3. Attorneys•in-Fact shall have power and authority to execute affidavits required to be attached to bonds,rocognszances,contracts of indem- nity or other conditional or obligatory undertakings end they shall also have power axed authority to certify the firsancof statement of the Company and to copies of the By•Lews of the Company or any article or section thereof. This power of attorney rs `Wgnod and sealed by facsimile under and by authority of the follovene Resolution adopted by the Board of Directors of UNITED PACIFIC INSURANCE COMPANY at a meeting held on the 5th day of June,1979,et which a quorum was present,rand said Resolution has not been amended or repealed • "Resolved,that the signatures of such directors and officers rind the teal of the Company may be affixed to any such power of attorney or any certificate relating thereto by focsrmsle;and any such power of attorney ci certificate bearing Each facsimile signatures or laminae seal shall be valid and binding upon the Company and any such power so executed and certified by facsimile signatures and facsimile seal shell be valid and binding upon the Company in the future with meet to any bond or undertaking to which it is attached." IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the UNITED PACIFIC INSURANCE COMPANY has caused theca presents to be signed by tee Vice President,and its corporate teal to be hereto affixed,this 4th fly of September 19 85 • 'a"'t� UNITED P IFIC INSURANCE COMPANY MAL )� Vices President STATE OF Washington COUNTY OF P9ilton U. On this 4th day of September .vo 8 pertonally eppoaed Charles B. Schmalz to me known to be the Vice-President of the UNITED PACIFIC INSURANCE COMPANY,and acknowledged that he eaccuted and attested the fore• gousg instrument old affixed the teal of said corporation thereto,end that Articb VII,Section 1,2,and 3 of the By-doers of said Company.end the Retolution,cat forth therein,toe Mill in full force. W4 boyrt+ Conlraroh E awrea• o L2„ n ,-ryPetblic cri and for Blots of July 20 .19 86 .•r-.40..• Washington l at Milton Lawrence W. Carlstrom .Ataistant Secretory of the UNITED PACIFIC INSURANCE COUPANY,do hereby certify that the above and forgoing is a tru3 and=erect copy of o roam of Attorney oemartcd by said UNITED PACIFIC INSURANCE COMPANY.which es still in full force and effect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,I hew hereunto art my t,endand affixed t113 lash of Mid Cd"M"t2+i3 19th PaDy of Marcie 19 86 11,1* Atx+awsl Siercrvf;7r, i e r IlDu tQ31 Ed. 4/B0 Bond No. U55 12 98 • • DEFERRAL PERFORMANCE BOND DEFERRAL NO. PROJECT OWNER: Orillia Limited Partnership .I STATE OF WASHINGTON ) • ) ss COUNTY OF KING ) • KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that we Orillia Limited Partnership I _ as Principal, and the , United Pacific Insurance Co. , a corporation organized and existing under and by virtue of the laws of the State of Washington • .and authorized to transact the business of' surety in the State of Washington, as surety, are held and firmly bound unto the City of Renton, State of Washington, , in the penal sum of $201480:00 ' ' ' ' for payment of which, well and truly to be made, we bind ourselves and each of our heirs , executors , administrators and assigns , jointly and severally, firmly by these presents. The condition of the foregoing obligation is such that the above described principal must construct the improvements described , in attached Exhibit "A" and have them accepted by the City of Renton, on or before the 1st day of • June , 1991 . This bond is specifically given to induce the City of Renton to defer these improvements until the above mentioned date and this bond serves -1- • • as security for the installation of those improvements . The principals of this bond agree to the following terms and conditions: Said improvements and their appurtenances thereto shall be constructed in accordance with approved plans and as per City of Renton standards and APWA standards where applicable. It is hereby expressly agreed that this bond is also given • and made as a guarantee against defective materials or workmanship in the construction of said improvements, provided, however, that no suit or action or proceeding by any reason of any defect whatever , • • • shall be brought upon this bond after one year following the final ' acceptance of said improvements by the City. The condition of this obligation is such that if the principal shall not construct said improvements in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth herein within the time limits prescribed, then the City can make demand upon the surety to complete said improvements . If the surety declines to construct • the improvements -at its sole cost and expense, then the surety shall be liable under this bond for the full amount of this bond, or the actual expense necessary for the City to install said improvements , whichever sum is less . • • Signed, sealed and dated this 19 day of • 'March. • . • • 198 6. . Orillia Limi d Partnership I APP'O D AS TO FORM: Prin / al a tAnt Lawrence J . 0%'ren, City Gener artner Attorney, C of Renton =2- • • • • •• • • • • • 1 ' I • • Deferral Performance Bond • Secretary • United Pacific Insurance Co. Bonding Company • *By • Mike Amundsen *Authorization for Attorney-In-Fact Attached Hereto ) . • • • • • AGENT: • • • Insurance & Investment Mgrs. , Inc. Name P.O. !Box 190903 • . Address Seattle, WA 98119 • • • (206)• 285-5533 Telephone • • • • • • -3- r r i EXHIBIT A Participation in area wide improvements identified by a traffic and circulation study of an area bounded by South 180th on the south, SR 167 on the east, SR 181 on the west and I 405 on the north, along with the extension of Oakesdale Ave. S.E. to SR 900. The Study shall identify (1) a circulation system adequate to accommodate motor vehicle traffic locally generated in the study area at build- out office park density, (2) the total estimated cost of the system, (3) the total trip generation assocated with said office Birk development, (4) an esti- mate of the per trip cost of constructing the system, (5) a list of those dle- ments of the system that have already been construced or committed to by proposed development and who have or will receive credit (on a trip basis) for the cost of that construction, and (6) a prioritization of the construction pro- jects needed in the immediate future to minimize the impact of development currently being proposed in the study area. The participation shall be based upon the project's proportionate share based upon estimated daily traffic generation as calculated by standards established in the Inistitute of Traffic Engineers Trip Generation Manual. The maximum cost shall not exceed $175.00 per trip (1149 trips). Credit will be allowed to the principal for the improvement of the inter- section of S.W. 39th Street and Lind Ave. S.W. including installation of a traf- fic signal, street widening and chanelization. The Bond may be released or reduced upon the completion of the intersection improvements or upon the comple- tion of other traffic improvement within the study area constructed with the consent of the Renton Department of Public works. The amount to be credited shall be agreed upon by the principal and the Department of Public Works. This Bond is applicable to Building // of the project known as Boeing Technical Park located on Lot 3 of the Plat Burlington Northern Industrial Park Renton II, King County, Washington. 1, UNITED �`. ��.7IFIC INSURANCE 1--01V1F ....JAD OFFICE.FEDERAL WAY,WASHINGTON POWER OF ATTORNEY KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS.That the UNITED PACIFIC INSURANCE COMPANY.a carpwatiwh drily ordinizsd grader,,?he laws of the State of Washington,does hereby make,constitute and appoint MIKE AMUNDSEN of SEATTLE, WASHINGTON--- its true and lawful Attorney-in-Fos-Lee make,execute,col and deliver fa and on its behalf,and es its set and Bead • • ANY AND ALL BONDS AND UNDERTAKINGS OF SURETYSHIP--- end to bind the UNITED PACIFIC INSURANCE COMPANY thereby as fully and to the same extent ca if such bonds arid undertakings and other writings obligatory in the nature thereof *axe signed by an Executive Officer of the UNITED PACIFIC INSURANCE COMPANY and sealed and attested by one other of such officers,end hereby ratifies and confirms all that its said Attorney(s)-in•Foet may do in pursuence hereof. This Power of Attorney is granted under and by authority of Article VII of the By-Laws of UNITED PACIFIC INSURANCE COMPANY which became effective September 7,1979,which provisions are now in full force and effect,reading as follows. ARTICLE VII - EXECUTION OF BONDS AND UNDERTAKINGS • 1. The Board of•Directors,the President,the Chairman of the Board,any Senior Vice President,any Vice President or Assistant Vice President or other officer designated by the Board of Directors shall have power and authority to(a)appoint Attorneys-in-Fact and to authorize them to execute on behalf of the Company,bonds and undertakings,recognizances, contracts of indemnity and other writings obligatory in the nature thereof.end (b1 to remove any such Attorney-in-Fact at any time and revoke the power and authority given to him. 2. Attorneys-in-Fact shall have power and authority,eubjeet to the terms and limitations of the power of attorney issued to them,to execute and deliver on behalf of the Company,bonds and undertakings,recognixar ces,contracts of indemnity end other writings obligatory in the nature thereof. The corporate seal is not necessary for the validity of any bonds and undertaking..recognizanees,contracts of indsrnnity and other writings obligatory in the nature thereof. 3. Attorneys-in-Fact shall have power and authority to execute affidavits required to be attached to bonds,recognizances.contracts of indem- nity of other conditional or obligatory undertakings end they shell also have power and authority to certify the flan aril statement of the Company and to copies of the By-laws of the Company or any article or section thereof. • This power of attorney.t9 reined and coaled by facsimile under and by authority of the following Resolution adopted by the Board of Directors of UNITED PACIFIC INSURANCE COMPANY at a meeting held on the 5th day of June,1979.at which a quorum vas present,and said Resolution has not been amended or repealed "Resolved.that the signatures of such directors and officers and the col of the Company may be affixed to any such power of attorney or any certificate relating thereto by facsimile,and any such power of attorney or certificate bearing such facsimile signatures or facsimile weal shall be valid and binding upon the Company and any Such power so executed and certified by facsimile signatures end facsimile seal shall be valid and bonding upon the Company in the future with redact to any bond or undertaking to which it it attached." IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the UNITED PACIFIC INSURANCE COMPANY has mused these presents to be signed by let Vice,President,ornd its corporate teal to be hereto affixed,this 4th day of September 99 85 �"'°it, UNITED P IFIC INSURANCE COMPANY • reek!) roN ...rip Vise President STATE OF Washington Is:. COUNTY OF Milton On this 4th day of September .19 8.5 p cionally appeared Charles B. Schmalz to me known to be the Vice-President of the UNITED PACIFIC INSURANCE COMPANY.eland acknowledged that he executed and attested the fore- tieing instrument and affixed the zeal of seed corporation thereto,end that Article VII,Section 1,2,and 3 of the By-Laws of said Company,and the Resolution,est forth therein,are still in full force. My Commission Enpn►es• V `; Sara July 20 .19 86 ry Public se and for Sta of Washington ti Nor Reeiehng at Milton 1, Lawrence W. Carlstrom .Assistant Secretory d the UNITED PACIFIC INSURANCE COMPANY,do hereby certify that the above end foregoing is a true and corroct copy of a Power of Attorney executed by said UNITED PACIFIC INSURANCE COMPANY,which is still in full force and affect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,I hive hereunto tot my heed end affixed the sal of said Company this 19th trey of March 19 86 ODU tut Ea. 1/BO (! )� Aasetant SeeretarØi'n..ii / f ., n. :.i-. Bond No. U55 12 95 • DEFERRAL PERFORMANCE. BOND DEFERRAL NO. PROJECT OWNER: Orillia Limited Partnership i STATE OF WASHINGTON ) • ss COUNTY OF KING ) KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that we Or_illia Limited Partnership I _ , as Principal, and the United Pacific Insurance Co. , a corporation organized and existing under and by virtue of the laws of the State' of Washington and authorized to transact the business of' surety in the State of Washington, as surety, are held and firmly bound unto the City of Renton, State of Washington, . in the penal sum of $125:023:50 • for payment of which, well and truly to be made, we bind ourselves and each of our heirs , executors , administrators and assigns , jointly and severally, firmly by these presents. The condition of the foregoing obligation is such that the above described principal must construct the improvements described in attached Exhibit "A" and have them accepted by the City of Renton, on or before the 1st., day of 17ine , 1991 . This bond is specifically given to induce the City of Renton to defer these improvements until the above mentioned date and this bond serves -1- >. • • as security for the installation of those improvements . The principals of this bond agree to the following terms and conditions: Said improvements and their appurtenances thereto shall be constructed in accordance with approved plans and as per City of Renton standards and APWA standards where applicable. It is hereby expressly agreed that this bond is also given -and made as a guarantee against defective materials or workmanship in the construction of said improvements , provided, however, that no suit or action or proceeding by any reason of any defect whatever . • • shall be brought upon this bond after one year following the final acceptance of said improvements by the City. . The condition of this obligation is such that if the principal shall not construct said improvements in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth herein within the time limits prescribed, then the City can make demand upon the surety to complete said improvements . If the surety declines to construct ' the improvements ,•at its sole cost and expense, then the surety shall be liable under this bond for the full amount of this bond, or the actual expense necessary for the City to install said. improvements , whichever sum is less . • Signed, sealed and dated this 19 day. of 'March ' ' ' ' . , 198 6. . Ori1 L. _ted Partnership I • AP ' O ID AS I FORM: Pr' c p Ora ence J . �"en, City 17r/artner Attorney, City of Renton -2- • • ►. • . • Deferral Performance Bond • • Secretary • United Pacific Insurance Co. • , Bonding Company y Mike Amundsen • *Authorization for Attorney-In-Fact Attached Hereto • • • • AGENT: • , • • Insurance & Investment Mgrs. , Inc. Name • P.O. ;Box 190903 Address Seattle, WA 98119 (2061 285-5533 Telephone • • • • • • -3- • • EXHIBIT A Participation in area wide improvements identified by a traffic and circulation study of an area bounded by South 180th on the south, SR 167 on the east, SR 181 on the west and I 405 on the north, along with the extension of Oakesdale Ave. S.E. to SR 900. The Study shall identify (1) a circulation system adequate to accommodate motor vehicle traffic locally generated in the study area at build- out office pork density, (2) the total estimated cost of the system, (3) the total trip generation assocated with said office park development, (4) an esti- mate of the per trip cost of constructing the system, (5) a list of those ele- ments of the system that have already been construced or oomnitted to by proposed development and who have or will receive credit (on a trip basis) for the cost of that construction, and (6) a prioritization of the construction pro- jects needed in the immediate future to minimize the impact of development currently being proposed in the study area. The participation shall be based upon the project's proportionate share based upon estimated daily traffic generation as calculated by standards established in the Inistitute of Traffic Engineers Trip Generation Manual. The maximum cost shall not exceed $175.00 per trip (714 trips). Credit will be allowed to the principal for the improvement of the inter- section of S.W. 39th Street and Lind Ave. S.W. including installation of a traf- fic signal, street widening and chanelization. The Bond may be released or reduced upon the completion of the intersection improvements or upon the comple- tion of other traffic improvement within the study area constructed with the consent of the Renton Department of Public works. The amount to be credited shall be agreed upon by the principal and the Department of Public Works. This Bond is applicable to Building , ' of the project known as Boeing Technical Park located on Lot 2 of the Plat Burlington Northern Industrial Park Renton II, King County, Washington. UNITED I'", FIC INSURANCE 7C-4X' L'kJ.Y ~V EAD OFFICE,FEDERAL WAY,WASHINGTON POWER OF ATTORNEY KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS.That the UNITED PACIFIC INSURANCE COMPANY.•oarporation duly orgenieed under the taws of the State of Washington,doss hvaby mike.constitute and Wpoint • MIKE AMUNDSEN of SEATTLE, WASHINGTON--- its true end lawful Attorney'en-Fcct,to ttsake,execute,tool and deliver far and an its teens/(.and as its ast and deed • ANY AND ALL BONDS AND UNDERTAKINGS OF SURETYSHIP--- end to bind the UNITED PACIFIC INSURANCE COMPANY thereby as fully and to the same extent as if such bonds and undertakings and other writings obligatory in the nature thereof were signed by an Executive Officer of the UNITED PACIFIC INSURANCE COMPANY and sealed and attested by one other of such officers,and hereby ratifies and confirms all that its said Attornoy(i)-in•Fect may do in puissance hereof. This Power of Attorney is granted under and by authority of Article VII of the By•Laws of UNITED PACIFIC INSURANCE COMPANY which became effective September 7.1973,which provessonsore now en full force and affect,reading es follows. ARTICLE VII— EXECUTION OF BONDS AND UNDERTAKINGS 1. The Board of Directors,the President,the Chairman of the Board,any Senior Vice President,any Vice President or Assistant Vice President or other officer designated by the Board of Directors shall have power and authority to(al appoint Attarneys•rn•Fect and to authorize them to execute on behalf of the Company,bonds end undertakings,recognizences, contracts of indemnity and other writings obligatory in the nature thereof,and(b) to remove any such Attorney-in•Fact at any time and revoke the power and authority given to him. 2. Attorneys•in-Fact shalt have power and authority,subject to the terms and limitations of the power of attorney issued to them,to execute and deliver on behalf of the Company,bonds and undertakings,recognizance',contracts of indemnity and other writings obligatory in the nature thereof. The corporate seat is not necessary for the validity of any bonds and undertaking.,recognrzencos,contracts of mdenmity and other writings obligatory on the nature thereof. • 3. Attorneys•rn-Fan shall have power and authority to eneeute affidavits required to be attached to bonds,recognszances•contracts of indem- nity or other conditional or obligatory undertakings end they shall also have power end authority to certify the fnnencnt statement of the Company and to copies of the By•Laws of the Company or any article or section thereof. This power of attorney es `igned and sealed by facsimile under and by authority of the following Resolution adopted by the Board of Directors of UNITED PACIFIC INSURANCE COMPANY at a meeting held on the 5th day of June,1979,at which a quorum we;present,and sold Resolution has not been amended or repealed • "Resolved,that the signatures of such directors and officers and the seal of the Company rre,y be affixed to any such power of attorney or any eenrfreate relating thereto by facsimile,and any such payer of attorney or certificate bearing such facsimile signatures or fanemik seal shall be valid and binding upon the Company and any such power so executed and certified by facsimile signatures and facsimile seal shall be valid and banding upon the Company in the future with reject to any bond or undertaking to which it it attached." IN WITNESS WHEREOF.the UNITED PACIFIC INSURANCE COMPANY has paused these presents to be signed by its Vice President,and its corporate seal to be hereto affixed,this 4th day of September 19 85 • -•'"!t, UNITED P IF IC INSURANCE COMPANY reek)� errN Armep Vice President STATE OF Washington ,�, COUNTY OF Milton J On this 4th gay of September .t9 8 mortify mattered Charles B. Schmalz to me known to be the Vrce•President of the UNITED PACIFIC INSURANCE COMPANY,and acknowledged that he executed and attested the fore- going instrument and affixed the seal of said corporation thereto.end that Article VII,Section 1,2,end 3 of the Oy-Lews of said Company,end the Resolution,set forth therein,ere still in full force. My Commission E noires• �„ i. July 20 .t• 86 �'4:N:•'e� ry Public,x and for Etaae of Washington Rending at Milton I Lawrence W. Carlstrom ,Atsiteent Secretary of the UNITED PACIFIC INSURANCE COMPANY.de, hereby certify that the above and foregoing es a true and correct copy of o Power of Attorney avowed by said UNITED PACIFIC INSURANCE COMPANY,which es still in lull lore,and effect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF.I have hereunto set my hand end affixed the sal of said Contynny this 19th thy of March 10 86 J�1 t/�i sou 1431 Ea. 1lBO pp0.� Assistant Scorer r�}111Gs/�L ••I• , Bond No. U55 12 96 • DEFERRAL. PERFORMANCE BOND DEFERRAL NO. PROJECT OWNER: Orillia Limited Partnership I STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ss COUNTY OF KING ) • KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that we Orillia Limited Partnership I _ , as Principal, and the United Pacific Insurance Company , a corporation organized and existing under and by virtue of the laws of the State of Washington• . . • . ' '. . and authorized to transact the • business of' surety in the State of Washington, as surety, are held and firmly bound unto the City of Renton, State of Washington, • in • the penal sum of '$125;023.50 • ' ' • for payment of which, • well and truly to be made, we bind ourselves and each of our heirs , executors , administrators and assigns , jointly and severally, firmly by these presents. The condition of the foregoing obligation is such that the above described principal must construct the improvements described in attached Exhibit "A" and have them accepted by the City of Renton, on or before the 1st . day of • June , 199E . This bond is specifically given to induce the City of Renton to defer these improvements until the above mentioned date and this bond serves -1- • • as security for the installation of those improvements . The principals of this bond agree to the following terms and conditions: . Said improvements and their appurtenances thereto shall be constructed in accordance with approved plans and as per City of Renton standards and APWA standards where applicable. It is hereby expressly agreed that this bond is also given and made as a guarantee against defective materials or workmanship in the construction of said improvements, provided, however, that no suit or action or proceeding by any reason of any defect whatever • shall be brought upon this bond after one year following the final acceptance of said improvements by the City. The condition of this obligation is such that if the principal shall not construct said improvements in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth herein within the time limits prescribed, then the City can make demand upon the surety to complete said improvements . If the surety declines to construct ' ' the improvements ' at its sole cost and expense, then the surety shall be liable under this bond for the full amount of this bond, or the actual expense necessary for the City to install said improvements , whichever sum is less . • Signed, sealed and dated this 19 day of • 'March. 198 6. Orillia ?Led P tner ship I • AP 0 ED AS TO FORM: pr'n ipa Lawrence W ren, City Gen rd Partner Attorney, y of Renton -2- 1' 1 EXHIBIT A Participation in area wide improvements identified by a traffic and circulation study of an area bounded by South 180th on the south, SR 167 on the east, SR 181 on the west and I 405 on the north, along with the extension of Oakesdale Ave. S.E. to SR 900. The Study shall identify (1) a circulation system adequate to accommodate motor vehicle traffic locally generated in the study area at build- out office park density, (2) the total estimated cost of the system, (3) the total trip generation assocated with said office park development, (4) an esti- mate of the per trip cost of constructing the system, (5) a list of those ele- ments of the system that have already been construced or committed to by proposed development and who have or will receive credit (on a trip basis) for the cost of that construction, and (6) a prioritization of the construction pro- jects needed in the immediate future to minimize the impact of development currently being proposed in the study area. The participation shall be based upon the project's proportionate share based upon estimated daily traffic generation as calculated by standards established in the Inistitute of Traffic Engineers Trip Generation Manual. The maximum cost shall not exceed $175.00 per trip (714 trips). Credit will be allowed to the principal for the improvement of the inter- section of S.W. 39th Street and Lind Ave. S.W. including installation of a traf- fic signal, street widening and chanelization. The Bond may be released or reduced upon the completion of the intersection improvements or upon the comple- tion of other traffic improvement within the study area constructed with the consent of the Renton Department of Public works. The amount to be credited shall be agreed upon by the principal and the Department of Public Works. This Bond is applicable to Building 5F of the project known as Boeing Technical Park located on Lot 2 of the Plat Burlington Northern Industrial Park Renton II, King County, Washington. • • • • Deferral Performance Bond • • • • • Secretary • • • United Pacific Insurance Co. • Bonding Company • + *By Mike Amundsen • • *Authorization for Attorney-In-Fact Attached Hereto • • • AGENT: • Insurance & Investment Mgrs. , Inc. Name • P.O.! Box 190903 • • Address Seattle, WA 98119 - • • (20 ) 285-5533 Telephone • • • • • -3- • UNITED INSUIFLANCE/-101VIPANY • ` 'HEAD OFFICE.FEDERAL WAY,WASHINGTON POWER OF ATTORNEY KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS,That the UNITED PACIFIC INSURANCE COMPANY,a corporation duly tondo'the laws of the State of Washington.doss hereby mks.constitute and appoint • MIKE AMUNDSEN of SEATTLE, WASHINGTON--- ees true end lawful Attorney-in•Fact,to maks.execute,teal end deliver far end on its behalf,and as its act and erased ANY AND ALL BONDS AND UNDERTAKINGS OF SURETYSHIP--- end to bind the UNITED PACIFIC INSURANCE COMPANY thereby os tally end to the same tortoni as of such bonds wets undertakings and other writings obligatory in the nature thereof were signed by en Eeeeutrve Officer of die UNITED PACIFIC INSURANCE COMPANY end sealed and attested by one other of such officers,end hereby ratifies and confirms all that its said Attorney(s)•in-Fact may do in pursuance hereof. This Power of Attorney is granted under and by authority of Ankle VII of the Bylaws of UNITED PACIFIC INSURANCE COMPANY which became effective September 7,1078,which provisions we now in full force and effect,reading as follows. ARTICLE VII— EXECUTION OF BONDS AND UNDERTAKINGS 1. The Board of Directors,the President,the Chairman of the L°soerd.any Senior Vice President,any Vice Prssiderit or Assistant Vice President or other officer designated by the Board of Directors shall have power and authority to la/stint Attorneys-in-Fact and to authorize them to execute on behalf of the Company.bonds and undertakings,rocognizances, contracts of indemnity and other writings obligatory in the nature thereof,and (bl to remove any such Attorrtcy•in•Foct at any time and revoke the power end authority given tie hem, 2. Attorneys-in-Fact shall have power and authority,subject to the terms and limitations of the power of attorney issued to them,to execute end deliver on behalf of the Company,bonds and undertakings.recognizariors.contracts of indemnity end other writings obligatory in the nature thereof. The corporate seal is not necessary for the validity of any bonds and undertaking.,rscagnizances,contracts of indemnity end other writings obligatory in the nature thereof. 3. Attorneys-in-Fact shall have power and authority to emoting affidavits required to to attached to bonds,recognizonces.contracts of indem- nity or other conditional or obligatory undertakings end they shell also hive power end authority to certify the finenool statement of the Company and to copies of the By•Laws of the Company or any article or section thereof. This power of attorney is signed and sealed by facsimile under and by authority of the following Resolution adopted by the Board of Directors of UNITED PACIFIC INSURANCE COMPANY at a meeting held on the 5th day of June.1979,at which a quorum nos piosent,and said Resolution has not been amended or repealed "Resolved,that the signatures of suds directors and offiewt and the col of the Company may be affixed to any such power of attorney or any cenifecete relating thereto by facsimile,and any such power of attorney or certificate tearing such facsimile signatures or faaemik seal shall be valid and binding upon the Company and any suers power so executed and certified by facsimile signatures and facsimile seal shall be valid and binding upon the Company an the future with respect to any bond or undertaking to which.it is attached." IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the UNITED PACIFIC INSURANCE COMPANY has caused theca presents to be signed by its Vice President,and its corporate seal to be hereto affixed,this 4th day of September 19 85 UNITED P IFIC INSURANCE COMPANY Vice President STATE OF Washington ��• COUNTY OF Milton On this 4th prof September 99 8 pantwnellyappenrod Charles B. Schmalz so me known to be the Vice-President of the UNITED PACIFIC INSURANCE COMPANY,and ecknowlodgad that he executed end attested the fore• going instrument and affixed the seal of said corporation thereto,end that Article VII,Section 1,2,end 3 of the 3y•Laws of said Company,end the Resolution,set forth therein,ore still in full force. .' My Commission Emotes' �,, '+• :_. .' '8n, ti.... July 20 .19 66 •�'••:•• • t�eblic ea tend far State of Washington 4_M. Resettle)at Milton I Lawrence W. Carlstrom •Assistant Secretary cif the UNITED PACIFIC INSURANCE COMPANY,do hereby certify that the above end foregoing is a trio and correct aolay of a Power of Attorney snouted by told UNITED PACIFIC INSURANCE COMPANY,which es still in full force and effect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF.I haw hereunto set nil►bend and affixed the mei of said Cantons des 19th day of March 19 86 eau 1431 Ed. 4/90 Aressent Sasresar / ' �� � BOEING ELECTRONICS COMPANY A Div!son of The Boeing Company M/S 9A-63 P 0.Box 3707 Seattle,Washington 98124-2207 March 11, 1986 9-4110-DWH-301 Fred J. Kaufman - Hearing Examiner Il City of Renton Municipal Building MAR 1419R6 200 Mill Avenue South SU1i IJ;NG, .�1 Renton, WA 98055 ��1��(�1(; B , Dear Mr. Kaufman: Pursuant to your report (File No. SA-100-85) dated 2/10/86, item #4 and #5, the following is offered: Boeing Electronics Company met with Metro on the subject of coordinating programs to minimize of the number separate automobile trips on Friday, February 28. A follow-up meeting is scheduled for March 19. A transportation coordinator for Boeing Electronics Company has been identified - Dave Hambelton, Facilities; he can be reached on 575-5821. It should be noted that the Boeing Company has substantial policies and a record supporting mass transit and decreasing single occupant vehicles trips. Some of these include but are not limited to: Industrial Relations Instruction No. 219 - encourages and assists employees in commuting to work by some means other than driving alone. Specific programs which will receive primary company administrative support are ride-sharing, public transit, and van-pooling. Operating Procedure Directive 4-1000-012 - establishes the vanpool program's objectives and assigns responsibilities to certain functional organizations involved in its administration. Boeing Policy Implementation Instruction No. 7H1-2 - establishes guidelines to be followed by Company organizations to reduce transportation energy consumption by employees. Several Metro subscription buses serve Boeing sites. Boeing Electronics Company, as a part of the Boeing Company, will continue to work with Metro in any way possible to reduce the amount of traffic in the valley area to benefit all commuters. -?3A(.42_,Prke4-,3. tr-f-J. A. Johnson cc: Berkley Structures Gary Norris - Traffic Engineer Ron Nelson - Building and Zoning DWH:kf lr OF RA, A �� 6 ° BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR Z NIL 'a' o 0 so "� � MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 o 235-2540 0 P,9gTE SEPTE•�� O BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR March 4. 1986 Douglas Gardner, Project Manager Berkley Structures, Inc. 201 Ellington Avenue West #407 Seattle. Washington 98119 RE: BUILDING 11/SA-106-85/HEARING EXAMINER CONDITIONS Dear Mr. Gardner: The Hearing Examiner in his approval of site plan, file SA-106-85, included four provisions; The implementation of those four provisions is under the authority of the Building and Zoning Department. It is our position that the following circumstances affect our department's implementation of those four conditions. 1. The Hearing Examiner required that "parking and aisle width shall be modified as generally demonstrated on exhibit #2, including the modification of turning radii, elimination of parking immediately north of building #11, and the provision of a "plaza" emergency drive across the rail line in the center of the site." The site plans as presently submitted by your firm complies with the intent of the first three provisions. However, the fourth issue of a "plaza" emergency drive across the rail line in the center of the site has not been addressed. This may be a result of the fact that you have provided adequate circulation and turning radii to the north by relocating the primary east-west drive through the site to connect into future building site #12. The plaza is still a requirement that the Hearing Examiner imposed. The site plan for building #11 should be made by your firm at this time to include the plaza. There is the possibility that you could increase the pedestrian corridors along the south side of the east-west access drive to create a "plaza" effect. 2. The Hearing Examiner also required that "the provision of a pedestrian easement from the cul-de-sac to the springbrook public right-of-way." \ Douglas Gardner March 4, 1986 Page 2 The easement is already provided on the underlying plat. However, improvement of that easement was contemplated during the public hearing, and the Building and Zoning Department would interpret the provision to mean the actual construction of interconnection with the Springbrook public right-of-way. 3. The third provision the Hearing Examiner required was "the provision of one acre of recreational facilities near the southwest corner of the subject site." Your firm has shown the set aside area of one acre to meet the intent of this provision. However, setting aside does not specifically comply with the intent to provide "recreational facilities." Therefore, the Building and Zoning Department will require that a recreational plan showing the actual facilities to be installed be approved at the time of building permit issuance. Please be aware that these plans may be modified if you decide to redesign building #12. 4. The Hearing Examiner also required that "landscaping shall be provided in accordance with the language and conclusions 8 and 9 above." The Hearing Examiner was specifically pointing to the fact that the • development should create a campus-like setting and heavy landscaping should be required around the perimeter that blends all of the facets from an aesthetic point of view. This item will be carefully evaluated by the City's landscape architect at the time of building plan approval. If you have any questions or concerns about the Zoning Division's official interpretation of the Hearing Examiner's report, please contact us immediately. Sincerely, 9:/L4-1(1‘6A-- Roger 41 Blaylock Zoning Administrator RJB:ss 2256Z OF R ° BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT U " RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR o MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 p 235-2540 04 co. 09gT�4 SEPT BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR March 3, 1986 Douglas N. Gardner, Project Manager Berkley Structures, Inc. 201 Ellington Avenue West #407 Seattle, Washington 98119 RE: BECO/CLARIFICATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS • Dear Mr. Gardner: The Environmental Review Committee met on Wednesday. February determined that the conditions that were originally implied on the Orilliia Properties project for the BECO Company can be clarified as follows: 1. Environmental conditions concerning the payment of fees for traffic mitigation shall be in the form of a letter of credit issued to the City of Renton. 2. The traffic signal at S.W. 39th Street and Lind Avenue S.W. had previously been determined to be installed by September 1, 1986 under a previous negotiated agreement. A total of $100,000 can be credited for the construction of this signal. This amount does have to 'be • included in the letter of credit, if construction plans are not approved for the traffic signal prior to issuance of a building permit. (Plans should be approved in the next 90 days to assure installation of the traffic signal by September 1, 1986. 3. Payment of traffic mitigation fees will be at the time of issuance of the building permit in the form of a letter of credit specifically applied to the trip generation for that building. The letter of credit will be open ended without a date of expiration. However, all off-site traffic mitigation shall be completed no later than March 1, 1987. 4. The Environmental Review Committee since it is waiting upon additional information to prioritize the necessary traffic improvements in the entire Green River Valley Planning Area as determined cannot prioritize at this time specific improvements the developer can accomplish in lieu of actual payment of fees. The Environmental Review Committee by September 1, 1986 will provide the developer with a prioritization schedule and a time schedule. • w Douglas N. Gardner March 3. 1986 Page 2 5. The Environmental Review Committee cannot commit to a position on whether refunds will be appropriate under the methodology established for the implementation of the necessary traffic improvements. It can only be assumed at this time that if the final calculations are less than $175 per vehicle trip then apr lication may be made for credit consideration. The Environmental Review Committee has taken the above positions based upon the methodology for implementing the necessary traffic improvements. This was the primary reason to require letters of credit instead of actual posting of cash deposits to the City treasury for the traffic impacts associated with the development. If you need additional clarification concerning the above positions. please contact Roger Blaylock, Zoning Administrator. at 235-2550. For the Environmental Review Committee, 9 . ,...Dce/U44— Roger J. Blaylock Zoning Administrator • RJB:ss 1054N - OF R.4,A A '- O THE CITY OF RENTON 4V, � ,F :, � Z MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH.98055 ma o 14 BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER 9'O FRED J. KAUFMAN. 235-2593 0,9gr�0 SEPIels°P February 25. 1986 Edward Heavey 201 Elliott Avenue. Suite 400 Seattle, Wa. 98119 RE: File No. SA-100-85; Orillia Property Associates Dear Mr. Heavey: The Examiner's Report regarding the referenced application which was published on February 10. 1986 has not been appealed within the 14-day period established by ordinance. Therefore, this matter is considered final and is being transmitted to the City Clerk this date for filing. Please feel free to contact this office if further assistance or information is required. Sincerely. Stece Y2-‘104--1-ar-gyav - - ---- --- - — - ---- - Fred J. Kaufman Hearing Examiner FJK:dk 1181E cc: Clerk Building & Zoning Department OF RA,, 0 , N-i o THE CITY OF RENTON u 4$ z yd+', MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH.98055 mil o ow ° BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR 0 LAND USE HEARING'EXAMINER 9° FRED J. KAUFMAN. 235-2593 0,9gr�D SEPSEse(c,P — February 14, 1986 Mr. Doug Gardner Project Manager Berkley Structures. Inc. 201 Elliott Avenue W. #303 Seattle, Wa. 98119 Re: SA-100-85 and SA-106-85 Dear Mr. Gardner: I have reviewed your request and find that it cannot be considered as the information provided is untimely and it would appear to warrant or necessitate other changes to the Site Plan(s) which was approved - such matters as additional parking or a larger building, or both. Such matters simply cannot be considered in this manner. In addition, at the applicant's urging the matter could not be considered without extending the applicable appeal periods. This Office would nonetheless encourage the parties to work together and to coordinate efforts to combine and consolidate where possible and permissible the various recreational facilities to arrive at a first-class, quality recreational environment, not only for the tenants of the Orillia complex(es) but for the general population as well. There is nothing in either this Decision or the original Decision which stops the applicant from dedicating the property or recreational facility to the public and/or at least opening it up to the public. If this Office can be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely. FRED J. KAUFMAN HEARING EXAMINER FJK/dk • cc: Roger Blaylock, Zoning Administrator Parties of Record '+4:1 Berkley Structures, Inc. 201 Elliott Ave.W#303•Seattle,Washington 98119• (206)281-8252 FECE a,tE February 13, 1986 FEB 14. 1986 City of Renton CITY OF RENTON • Office of the Hearing Examiner HEARING EXAMINER 200 Mill Ave South Renton, Washington 98055 RE: SA-106-86 & SA-100-85 Attention: Hearing Examiner - Fred J. Kaufman Dear Mr. Kaufman; We request reconsideration of Condition #3 the provision requiring one acre recreational facilities near the southwest corner of the site. In lieu of this condition we would like you to consider the following improvement along the Springbrook Creek Greenbelt and Pedestrian Easement adjacent to lots 6, 7, and 8 from Oaksdale to S.W. 34th Street (Approximately 2, 000 Lineal Feet , 40 ' feet wide or 1 .83 acres ) by adding a 12 foot paved jogging lane, warm up station, landscaping, picnic tables and benches. In talking this subject over with Boeing, City of Renton, Departments of Zoning , Housing and Community and Park and Recreation, I believe they agree that this proposal meets the intent of Condition #3, and is in conformance with our original understanding of the recreational requirement. It is our understanding that this does not affect the appeal dates , if this is not the fact we will withdraw the reconsideration to avoid any delays. Thank you for your time,. if you have any questions please call 281-8252. Sincerely, .L /////27 Dou Gardner Project Manager cc : Al Clow-- Mike Dunne Ed Heavey .v,pg R44. �� ® ° BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT - o RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR 0,9 MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 • 235-2540 � o99TED SEPcE�c BARBARA Y. SHINPOCHr f ,^" �� '.'� MAYOR r' MEMORANDUM FEB 141986 CITY OF EXAMINEREN TO DATE: February 13, 1986 TO: Fred J. Kaufman, Hearing Examiner FROM: Roger J. Blaylock, Zoning Administrator SUBJECT: ORILLIA PROPERTY ASSOCIATES/SA-106-85/RECONSIDERATION REQUEST OF CONDITION #3 The Building and Zoning Department presented facts in the public hearing showing that on-site recreation should be provided in industrial and office park areas. The Building and Zoning Department believes that recreation should be provided but it can be provided by two different methods. The first would provide private recreation supporting only the immediate user, while the second option would be to provide public areas available to the entire neighborhood. The applicant, Orillia Property Associates, has met with the Parks and Recreation Department and the Building and Zoning Department to discuss the possibility of improving approximately two acres of public park adjacent to the site in lieu of providing one acre of recreational amenities on site. The City staff has encouraged both the Environmental Review Committee and the Hearing Examiner in the past to develop publicly-owned properties with private dollars if at all possible. Both departments see an advantage in improving the public park area at this time for the following reasons: (1) it would provide an amenity to all of the office and industrial workers in the area: (2) it is not tied solely to the one lot which could be sold individually and thus losing the recreational amenities for the other office buildings in the complex: and (3) it improves a public park without having to budget public dollars. The developer does receive an economic advantage in that he can build a larger building, but he also provides a public benefit in both financing and improving public use areas now. , e • Fred J. Kaufman February 13, 1986 Page 2 The Building and Zoning Department has also consulted with the Policy Development Department in addition to the Parks and Recreation Department, and the three departments agree that where public lands are available recreational amenities could be transferred to those sites in lieu of providing on-site recreation. Therefore, we would recommend to the Examiner serious consideration of the applicant's request to improve the public right-of-way with the approval of the Parks and Recreation Department on the final design for the landscaping treatment and the Public Works Department approval for the emergency access roadway system. RJB:ss 2228Z AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING STATE OF WASHINGTON ) )ss. County of King ) • DOTTY KLINGMAN being first duly sworn, upon oath, deposes and states: That on. ' the 10th day of February , 1986 , affiant deposited in the mails of the United States a sealed envelope containing a decision or recommendation with postage prepaid, addressed to the parties of record in the below entitled application or petition. 441 � ) SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this /d %nf day of ( 0,9-4 Y' , 1986.. za_01,9, Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at rR,47J1T ic-) , therein. Application, Petition, or Case 4j: SA-100-85 - Orillia Property Associates (Boeing Co.) (The minutes contain a list of the parties of record.) 1170E February: 10, 1986 OFFICE OF THE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND DECISION. APPLICANT: ORILLIA PROPERTY ASSOCIATES FILE NO. SA-100-85 LOCATION: Northwest corner of Lind Avenue S.W. and S.W. 39th Street. SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Site Plan approval to allow the construction of three two-story office buildings totaling 178,605 square feet on an 11.74 acre site. SUMMARY OF ACTION: Building and Zoning Department Recommendation: Approval with conditions. Hearing Examiner Decision: Approved with conditions. BUILDING & ZONING The Building & Zoning Departent Report was DEPARTMENT REPORT: received by the Examiner on anuary 21, 1986. PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Building nd Zoning Department Report, examining available i formation on file with the application, and field the s king the property and surrounding area, the Examine conducted a. public hearing on the subject as follows The hearing was opened on January 28, 1986, at 9:05 A.M. in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. The following exhibits were entered into the record: Exhibit #1 - Yellow file containing application, proof of posting and publication, and other documentation pertinent to this request. Exhibit #2 - Site Plan Exhibit #3 - Landscape Plan Exhibit #4 - by reference, Site Plan for SA-106-85. Exhibit #5 - by reference, Landscape Plan for SA-106-85. Exhibit #6 - by reference, Yellow file for SA-106-85. The Zoning Administrator began stating this proposal is for three (3) two-story office buildings totalling 178,605 sq. ft. to be constructed on 11.74 acres of land, located south and east of the Springbrook Channel. Public services have been extended into the area with fire protection to come from the main fire station. Mr. Blaylock stated the proposal is part of the continuing expansion of the Boeing Electronics Company, 979 parking stalls will be provided with only 850 being required. The site is related to the traffic flow on Lind Avenue and the ERC has required that a traffic light at Lind Avenue and 39th Street be installed with lane widening to provide adequate turning movements. An area-wide circulation study by the Public Works Department has been presented and the ERC has sent the study out to a consultant for a breakdown of final specific costs on improvements and a presentation document to the public and the City Council. Approximately 2144 vehicle trips per day are predicted at a cost of $175.00 per trip. Continuing, Mr. Blaylock reviewed the comments received from other City departments noting the buildings are focused to the south, parking surrounds the buildings, modifications to planter islands to provide adequate fire access roadway widths will eliminate approximately 18 parking spaces, and a traffic light will be provided at 41st and Lind Avenue by no later than June 30, 1986. , Orillia Property Associates' _ SA-100-85 February 10, 1986 Page 2 The most northerly driveway on Lind Avenue S.W. should not be permitted because it is adjacent to a railway crossing thereby creating an unsafe situation. It was suggested that that access become a gated emergency access only. The center access, because it provides circulation through the entire site, should be right turn-in and right turn-out only. Continuing with the review, the criteria to be considered for approval of a site plan was reviewed noting the project is compatible with adjacent structures, the proposal complies with the Comprehensive Plan and height and setback limitations, and in order to ensure there will be no backing out onto the east-west roadway it was suggested that the east-west corridor be moved approximately 20 ft. to the south. Mr. Blaylock stated it is felt pedestrian circulation could create a problem as the proposed walkways dead-end into the parking lot and provide no connection to the public sidewalk system on either 39th Street or Lind Avenue N.W.. A large cafeteria area is proposed in the northwest corner of the building area which will serve both complexes thereby reinforcing the need to provide proper pedestrian circulation patterns. On-site recreation is to be provided and there will be minor revisions in the presented plan to accomplish this requirement. Approval of this proposal is recommended by staff, subject to the conditions set out in the staff report of Janury 28, 1986. The Examiner called for testimony in support of this application from the applicant or their representative. Responding for the applicant was: Edward Heavey 201 Elliott Avenue, Suite 400 Seattle, Wa. 98119 Acknowledging approval of the report as presented, Mr. Heavey advised they feel they have -determined methods to be used to meet the requests of the City and still maintain the goals-and intent of the site plan, and meet the needs of the employees. He stated in Phase I, Boeing Corporation has projected 1800 sq. ft. of recreational facilities including showers and exercise room as well as the outdoor eating facilities between the buildings. He requested an extension on the timing of installation of the traffic' light on 41st from June 30th to September 1, 1986, and advised they have a scheduled occupancy for June 1st on 4 of the 5 buildings to be constructed. At this point he introduced the Project Manager for this proposal. Testifying at this time was: Doug Gardner Project Manager 201 Elliott Avenue, Suite 400 Seattle, Wa. 98119 Mr. Gardner stated he, has been in touch with Boeing, and referring to on-site recreation said a jogging lane along Springbrook Creek has been discussed; the pedestrian walkways are being implemented and will be extended to S.W. 39th Street. He said the other concerns mentioned by staff will be worked out and did not feel there would be any problem with any of the'modifications. The Examiner called for further testimony in support of the application, there was none. There was no one wishing to speak in opposition. Wishing to comment as to the transportation aspect of this proposal was: Bill Roach METRO 821 Second Avenue, Mail Stop 53 Seattle, Wa. 98104 Mr. Roach spoke in support of the project, with modifications. He proposed that Metro be permitted to work with the developer, tenant and the City to encourage transit and ridesharing at the site. He feels the traffic impacts that will surface with 'additional' parking being provided as well as future developments in the area, are going to have to be mitigated, and suggested to the Examiner that developers be required to submit a Transportation Management Plan with their propoals. He suggested all proposals should be reviewed with Metro and the City simultaneously before final approval of a project. He reviewed basic elements Metro feels could be used as a basis for such a Plan, and stated a model plan could be provided. Mr. Roach felt the application presented today does not contain an adequate approach to ridesharing and transit information. The Examiner requested that Mr. Roach submit, in writing, his suggested program that could be utilized by the applicant and the City for this and future developments, and suggested that Mr. Roach attend a City Council meeting some time in the future and present his idea before that body. Mr. Roach said he would follow-up on that suggestion. Orillia Property Associates SA-100-85 February 10, 1986 Page 3 Further comments from Mr. Blaylock included the discussion of security fencing and its use in this plan, stating it is felt because this is a manufacturing park setting whereby the applicant is trying to maintain a street image, it would be wiser to place the fencing along the back edge of the landscaping instead of adjacent to the sidewalk. Referring to the Transportation Management Plan concept for this and future developments, he felt now is a good time for the applicant and other agencies involved to coordinate meetings. Calling for closing testimony or comments, there were none. The hearing was closed at 10:00 A.M. FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & DECISION: Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner now makes and enters the following: V FINDINGS: 1. The applicant, Orillia Property Associates, Limited Partnership, for the Boeing Company, the proposed tenant, has requested approval of a Site Plan for,three two-story office buildings on approximately 11.74 acres. 2. The application file containing the application, the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) documentation, the Building and Zoning Department Report, and other pertinent documents was entered in the record as Exhibit #1. 3. Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and SEPA (RCW 43.21C, 1971, as amended), a Declaration of Non-Significance has been issued for the subject proposal by the Environmental Review Committee (ERC), the responsible official. 4. Plans for the proposal have been reviewed by all City departments affected by the impact of this proposal. 5. The subject site is located at the northwest corner of the intersection of Lind Avenue S.W. and S.W. 39th Street. 6. The subject site was annexed into the City by the adoption of Ordinance 1745 in April, 1959, as amended by Ordinances 1764 and 1928 adopted in May, 1959 and December, 1961 respectively. The site was automatically zoned G-1 (General: Single Family Residential: Minimum lot size - 35,000 sq ft) upon annexation. 7. The site was reclassified to its current M-P (Manufacturing Park) zoning by the adoption of Ordinance 2533, enacted in December, 1969. The site was filled under a special permit issued in November, 1975. 8. The map element Comprehensive Plan designates the site for the development of manufacturing park/multiple option uses but does not mandate such development with out exploring the goals and policies elements of the Plan. 9. The applicant proposes developing on the 11.74 acre subject site 3 two- story buildings and parking for 979 autmobiles. Parking is required for only 850 vehicles. 10. The buildings will be concrete tilt-up construction and will contain approximately 178,605 square feet of office space. 11. While an LID resulted in extensive roadway and utility improvements in the area, the growth focus for the Valley has shifted from simply Manufacturing Park (warehouse and light industrial use), to Office Park. Traffic demands of office uses are substantially greater than warehousing, and for this reason the ERC required participation by the applicant in additional traffic improvements and analyses. 12. A number of conditions were placed upon the subject proposal by the ERC as part of the Declaration of Non-Significance. Those conditions require participation in a variety of traffic related improvements including the installation of a traffic signal • at Lind and 39th and the payment of a fee of not more than $175.00 per trip for an estimated 1,840 trips. The conditions also required the installation of an asphalt trail and other amenities along the Springbrook Creek, a dedicated public right-of-way immediately west of the subject site. • Orillia Property Associates SA-100-85 February 10, 1986 Page 4 13. The subject site was reviewed by the staff in conjunction with the adjoining westerly site (SA-106-85) which at this time has been approved subject to a variety of conditions. Similar conditions are contemplated for this site to provide compatible development. In addition, there are other proposals to house various operations of the Boeing Company in the immediate area, including those south of the subject site, as well as the companion site to the west. The adjacent site is integrally related to the subject site as the Decision for SA-106-85 indicated. 14. The parking lots will function as extensions of one another with links between the two sites. A common dining facility will also be incorporated within one of the two sites. The adjacent site will provide a 1 acre recreational facility, as well as providing a means to access the Springbrook right-of-way, a future trail system. 15. The Boeing Company use of the site is expected to generate a substantial daily vehicle trip count, one in excess of that ordinarily generated by a comparable facility. Boeing typically utilizes floor space to provide a maximum return per employee. Boeing generally increases its parking requirement by about 20 percent which is anticipated to generate a similar increase in traffic counts. 16. The Transit arm of the Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle (METRO) has objected to the parking specifications of Boeing and has requested that Boeing participate in constructive arrangements to reduce what is expected to be large traffic volumes confined to the Valley floor. The traffic is projected to drive the Levels of Service (LOS) to E and F. "stop and go", an almost stalled traffic flow. 17. The proposal is expected to house approximately 1,110 to 1,300 employees. The adjoining complex is anticipated to employ a similar number of people. Traffic counts are projected to be approximately 2,144 trips per day. Therefore, the conditions enumerated above were imposed by the ERC. Staff has also recommended measures to provide for the recreational needs of at least a segment of these employees. The applicant agreed to provide for recreational opportunities on the adjacent site. 18. Under the circumstances, the linkage between the subject site and the companion site is quite apparent and severance of the linkage would require additional review as was indicated in the earlier report. The sharing of facilities between legally separate properties does not guarantee perpetuity. 19. The applicant proposed 3 driveways along Lind Avenue and 2 along 39th. Staff recommended modification of this plan in conjunction with changes to the parking lot configuration. The proposed center driveway would serve as a collector aisle through the parking lot. Staff was concerned that backing movements onto this aisle would result in conflicts and suggested the aisle be moved south, parking along it be eliminated, (with no affect on required parking) and the other two drives along Lind be limited to emergency access. This east/west aisle will carry through to the western companion lot and provide a major link between that site and Lind. 20. The closure of the other two drives was recommended to preserve the arterial function of Lind and minimize the number of curb cuts along the arterial. 21. The three buildings will be constructed in a 'U' arrangement opened to the south. A small pond and some seating will be located in the open side of the 'U' arrangement. Parking will also be located in this area. 22. The arrangement of the parking aisles is such that emergency vehicles would be hampered in manuevering through the parking areas. Staff recommended modification of certain end stalls. Again. required parking would still be attained even with modification. 23. Staff also recommended carrying the interior pedestrian sidewalks through to the public sidewalks, and between this site and the westerly site. 24. Similar concerns voiced for the other site were raised for this site. Depending upon security needs, staff was concerned that the site not take on the appearance of a cyclone fenced stockade, and recommended that any fencing be interior to the peripheral landscaping and thereby softened. Orillia Property Associates SA-100-85 February 10, 1986 Page 5 CONCLUSIONS 1. The proposed Site Plan, when viewed together with the earlier approved adjacent site, SA-106-85, appears to serve the public use and interest. Some of the following conclusions follow exactly the conclusions reached in SA-106-85, the adjoining site to the west. 2. Again, like the other site, concerns must be raised regarding the development of shared facilities on separate lots. The compartmentalization of services or amenities, such as the 1 acre recreational complex proposed on the adjacent site, a cafeteria for the subject site, etc, does not address the potential severance of the linkage between sites in the future. If the sites are redeveloped or the linkage is severed, additional analysis would be required. Approval of this Site Plan is predicated upon the current proposed linkage. 3. Generally as shown on Exhibit #2, modifications to the parking stalls and to the driveways along Lind will be required. The central parking aisle will have to be moved south and the tier of parking which backs out onto this aisle eliminated. The other two drives along Lind may only be used for emergecny access and will have to be gated to limit entry. These modifications will also provide for safe access across the site by vehicles circulating through the parking lot and from this site across to the companion parcel west of this site. 4. While the applicant has agreed to provide the traffic improvements required by the ERC, the site will still generate a substantial amount of cars. The additional parking, over standard requirements, will serve as an invitation for employees to utilize individual vehicles, rather than explore alternative transporation, including car pools and public mass transit. Even with the extensive improvments envisioned, amounting to expenditures of up to 20 to 40 Million Dollars ($20 - $40,000,000), the Level of Service is anticipated to be LOS E/F, that is, the roads will be very congested. Therefore, the applicant shall have to provide a Transportation Coordinator who shall have the positive responsibility to work with Metro Transit, its Car Pool/Van Pool agency and the City of Renton to coordinate programs to minimize the number of separate automobile trips (known as single occupancy vehicles, SOV) generated by this and its associated adjoining proposal. 5. Frankly, while this Office has dabbled in requiring an applicant to provide van pool vehicles, the efforts were cumbersome and difficult to police. Therefore, without more this Office will refrain from imposing such requirements. This Office will forward the response of Metro in this matter to the City Council and to the Mayor's Office for their considered review. 6. The actual building design plans are limited. It does appear that the buildings are in scale with surrounding development. This site, unlike the compansion site, does provide a focal point, a small landscaped pond. The site will be tied by driveways and pedestrian paths to the adjoining western site and the amenities of the recreational area and Springbrook Creek. 7. This Office cannot be expected to ignore the existing Boeing complex immediately north of the Central Business District and its general appearance. It is not an office park-type of development like that envisioned by the Comprehensive Plan for the Green River Valley. This office will also not ignore such a complex's needs for security. As staff indicated, the Valley is supposed to be developed with an eye toward achieving aesthetic, appealing office park-type development, campus-type development around a spacious plaza, with buildings relating to each other and taking advantage of natural site amenities. Lind Ave is one of the major north/south connectors and is the premier entry point to the Valley from the north. This site and its companion site lie just north of the Valley's major interchange with SR-167, and provide an entry point into Renton's proposed area for campus-type office park development. Therefore, to assure the development presents the office park appearance which the Comprehensive Plan requires, and which other development along. Lind has been required to provide, if security fencing is installed, it shall be required to be adjacent to the perimeter parking and interior to the required landscaping. The landscaping shall be of such a nature as to hide and fully soften the appearance of any security fencing and shall be subject to the approval of the City's landscape architect. The landscaping shall consist of a combination of lawn, scrubs, and both flowering deciduous and conifer trees. This theme shall be consistent along the entire perimeter of the site, and shall be a continuation of the landscaping of the adjoining site, Site Plan SA-106-85. Or1llia Property Associate SA-100-85 February 10, 1986 Page 6 8. In the event fencing is not required, landscaping, subject to the approval of the City's Landscape Architect, shall consist of a combination of lawn, trees and shrubs. 9. The intent of this Decision is to show the linkage between the two sites and to provide in some manner that the development on the two sites is considered together. The sites share recreational amenities, eating facilities and access and parking systems. The two sites should have similar landscape treatments and the architectural details should be similar to further the image of a campus-type of development. DECISION The Site Plan is approved subject to the following conditions: 1. Parking and aisle width shall be modified as generally demonstrated on Exhibit #2, including the modification of turning radii, elimination of parking immediately north of the west and north buildings, and the modification to the northernmost and southernmost drives on Lind to serve for emergency access and the shifting of the center drive. 2. Landscaping shall be provided in accordance with the language of Conclusions 7 and 8 above. 3. The applicant, or the Boeing Company, shall appoint a Tranporation Coordinator who shall have the positive responsibility of working with Metro Transit, its Car Pool/Van Pool agency and the City of Renton to coordinate programs to minimize the number of separate automobile trips (known as single occupancy vehicles, SOV) generated by this and its associated adjoining proposal. ORDERED THIS 10th day of February, 1986. 717-4_01 FRED J. K FMAN HEARING EXAMINER TRANSMITTED THIS 10th day of February, 1986 to the parties of record: Edward Heavey 201 Elliott Avenue, Suite 400 Seattle, Wa. 98119 Doug Gardner Project Manager 201 Elliott Avenue, Suite 400 Seattle, Wa. 98119 Bill Roach METRO 821 Second Avenue, Mail Stop 53 Seattle, Wa. 98104 TRANSMITTED THIS 10th day of February, 1986 to the following: Mayor Barbara Y. Shinpoch Councilman Richard M. Stredicke Richard Houghton, Public Works Director Larry M. Springer, Policy Development Director Members, Renton Planning Commission Ronald Nelson, Building & Zoning Director Glen Gordon, Fire Marshal Roger Blaylock, Zoning Administrator Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Renton Record-Chronicle • • Oriilia Property Associates SA-100-85 February 10, 1986 Page 7 Pursuant to Title IV, Section 3015 of the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before February 24, 1986. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for review by the Examiner within fourteen (14) days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific errors relied upon by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record, take further action as he deems proper. An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Section 3016, which requires that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk, accompanying a filing fee of $75.00 and meeting other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection or purchase in the Finance Department, first floor of City Hall. The Appearance of Fairness Doctrine provides that no ex parte (private one-on-one) communications may occur concerning land use decisions. This means that parties to a land use decision may not communicate in private with any decision-maker concerning the proposal. Decision-makers in the land use process include both the Hearing Examiner and members of the City Council. All communications concerning the proposal must be made in public. This permits all interested parties to know the contents of the communication and would allow them to openly rebut the evidence. Any violation of this doctrine would result in the invalidation of the request by the Court. The Doctrine applies not only to the initial public hearing but to all Requests for Reconsideration as well as Appeals to the City Council. For purposes of these decisions and recommendations the terms "Should" and "Shall" are to be considered mandatory. The term "May" will be considered discretionary. When the report is a recommendation to the City Council the terms "should" and "shall" are intended to inform the City Council that if they approve the recommendation the items should be mandatory to preserve the intent of the decision. � ' � . � � ^ � � [� --- i � . --- --- | --- --' / z - | --- --- --' � | !' ^ ^4 ," | � --' -- --- / ' ! | ` . ^ �U � --- --- � /� | | -�- ! � EVERGREEN { TWA STAKING DETAIL TREE STAKING DETAIL GENERAL NOTES _- ..-`mow_ .// 1wel13eC .Sfu> 36"�^0 5 -y��_wC++.'^ p /�AA�` r �.re .n s �. '�(!,`,``�,` x.s..tmteerc . ;= esv�.s <-, --�� ...«�..:+. yT':. . C.:'� 4i ,, • - �� / v.o.nrI. s-c..vr..cree iM-.:azc wo"�:v-ern%..cc= _...ri /g • (' / /"%' 1. n::,'ivn 1 / e+`rr..'~ir..'urs+o+ �� / t y ``i4_ l• ' i' • »y+ ', "`""�{cy".� 1 ' uEa a- / �-". jo ",•.•>..c9. <.rr.. _asav',AC»v :...ea,.Ora 1 - • aG."-al..,CJ S.;..,. Y>.•ret,s-c_-:...G•e ,.(� / �•` ,' ' < 0 4 2 .. + szx.t+a.....`.v7a...v.n.rr !s.:. .r'.r, �j`• / /� j ' O 3 d.- .i-maz.eta - ,,,, bq - ••• 1 e C ;'/ li . 0 z 0,../..C:ZL..?�lV.'�`1.5. 9.^'..,.N. CCO •. 4t']CZ•.2.L�1Q'.. .., I.f 0.y ',r • ./. -- - - '� .,IJ- .>l,-....,,....T...:.^.�Lu»Kvt..a/s[.:/ .`•>.a[ .-i.:�.. it 1 � / '�,:�. • r �/ di 'it.: •1/ Z Sf= • t1 ,won.-..09..sa./..-t.dl....cGif =.� / /• —j —_ �'0 ,J �. _{---3 .-ra2.•.+.¢r :�..:.ru'7,-.�u1 s+=�rrA-w�i. __ —��[' ,/— �•- _ C 1, ��,l'� - r---- ) 7 SHRUB PLANTING DETAIL (0../ C3C . . • '.~/ 1 I •{ _. l II �.0 a'tiw..ati / ., . y�� `J ' l/ a : n J j� •' Li) LI la. 2,/of, ..� \\ s .:40'•, / �•, rr friff flff c..p — • _ • .: li e Fi • 8 . , c:›,tocc:R21 . t;,....:_.) • . . • • 1 1 SITE PLAN O , • .. > .. 11o,tA 5s✓T.e 5/1.Ger • i1 LC - .,. �� i 1 �f . � EL(� .l� .•10 4.= I�� H_1 L-1 K. I M—P I - 1 ,r VI • •tc .. 11L fa lb ( 1 _ I ' I ' I FI �� ,I , L 1 C. 3. `C I S M 29 oo Sr If; I� L— , • — 1 1 ' �--- I I 1 7 e 9 2 --1 , I II I , S.» tswD s I . --_—� ——. .—. 6 �r . I 5 I _ i' , S. W. 34TH R ` I -4( I I ivi—p) ;_,_ , y 9 _ _i. -. L I ; - i i , ' S i ;, I---- , fir•. �c j I , n .' Li J j/AOgill - /. .,) - L I 3 • i _. L._ ---. - --7 1 ------- S. W. 4/ST I STREET T ` ` P-1 - • ,/ . 6 VALLEY GENERAL HOSPITAL ri ._I I M P 8 , 5 ) )/ . \ . . ORILLIA PROPFtTY'ASSOC TES SA-10 -85 • .,� . A P P L I CANT ORTTT,IA PROPERTY ASSOCIATES TOTAL AREA ± 10.48 ACRES PRINCIPAL ACCESS S.W. 39TH STREET - 1 I EXISTING ZONING -M-P, MANUFACTURING PARK E X I S T 1 NG US IF.JNDEVELOPED PROPERTY I PROPOSED USE TI101 BUILDINGS TOTALING 153,300 SO.FT. OF OFFICE SPACE COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN M NUFACI'URING PARK/MULTIPLE OPTION COMMENTS • I ! _ • • . - • ... _ 1-.• , ,• . . i . i , . ; • ---...... 4... ; . . .. ....---... ...-,...--4... '- .--a....'...2.—, >,:•, , • . ._ u :j'' ' ' '' ;! i ;:L.L i- . • ,, !,. , l• , . , ---,......77 •,-••• •-•;,,,..;;. •,-:-.J p_. • • Sr ._ ;,•1 .1 .• ) (;,, . 4--rib ,i. i . ....,.. \ .1.!.,.,..:...,,i.!...,...:. ..„. ,.1.!..,. . .:...T.:.-,.4.::-.F.,:.!: _._ •, • • . .1. : . . . •_. , , \,, , , k \ •.\---6P••1.i-•'-1-;•••1. ',-- 7\ \ : J ; . : . - 1.Li:?;:',.,,:s' .•‘1 , ! ' • ' ..) ..... \ .1i, '. [fti • : • • . 1 • ;.. .771 F.-.7:— 1_.-1I ,-.-- . ; ... ;; ' '•'• . .i i•-• 1! i ! ' I ' 1 ' '''-n-- q ----.1-. , I • • , , . 1 \*; ..L1 L . , 1 1. Q.!,;.;,..,p•;:.:.!.„•p c-ist ,r L__.L !I -I ' __i_i 1.1"..,":" :J.\ I 7 [i ; 1 . . .. • I . .. . ... ;I b_‘ •_-- V , • 1 s'r---- 1... • Y • f f .II.:11 A ; ' [____1 1 .i '• .:- (1—.1.. . .i ._\ u ilL 1 ; t • I : '.-1.1—:. f i ' ' . I • 1 • 7 ',.. i-1 .1 : •,, , rf . 0,---, •• - !' , ! ,J.:.',. . . . , ..) ,- -• •o•—t ,_ ,.,.. .--) 4.. i ./.',-) 1 - !J-F-1 , .z.---;-?.::-.:...-1---": ,.. ' , i.i.i.,.i • 1 1 ! 1 • c."' -- II s v' ' • - 1 ;-0 ,_, I 1 • ,.. ___/ , , • ip , 1-.--- ---: 1 ;, I 1: -•- -: i-: ' "-1 *I.' i • -1 1 i I --— tl.'''''.....- 1 -i _ L 1 ._ 1 i... . •.• I ...I t, 1 ' • . 1 • ': ii,. : . ___, I . • i [--'-- I_• 1 1 , .1 I i • ; i • ' ; .. '.- •• . :1 ' I • • I ; I ...----,;.I. . , . I ; ; ;.., j ,, .• . .:. . • 1 . • . .• .. . 1 ; ; ;,• •;• •i 1 . ; r . • •. L.,' .. .. .. ____.„. I ; • , 1 ...:_i 1 f :.) V . I Ill ----• •r. '— 1 I. ', ,.,-) cti ' fi I, i N. _______. ._ .... ..: I , . 1!_l• AVe Li. .,.., ,./ t r•Pic %! . iVts. 4 • ; -- -UA_____ LSTEcr 1;;.• •. ______- ‘.. .• r. ., :;,-,.,,,..... , •A— t 0-0 r 13• : ift,it I i if P , • 1 ' li 11 i . . i ..... . FACILITY FOR I i ga,:o owl 101•••••'Newt • .... I • 1=J Smin PEN.,am BOEING ELECTRONICS COMPANY -- —7 H Tailmo GINI nom ,. RENTON,WAIORNOTON h • . . L 1'I I _' g n,,....r,u., .do — 1 a� Li � H1 1 re1I I I N G-1 - - L.. ' 1 _ \ _-': 1 I I ' I , 12 I, L-1 --- s r e9t. sr P'1 u 1I I 7 8 O5 2 II - I1 I � S M LOIN _! ---� — s • l,,r sr J T — i { '' II --- ; _ 11 1 _ 11"n—ir —� — - S • 1,---1 M 1 S. W. I 34TH ( , ! 1 11 R LtCtI /) _1 9 , I_ . 1 j j / �I n! . /, _. lyrN sr ` 0 2 11010091 1 S: �91.rS/: ri L 3 1. _ r .- 0 1 7 — 5 I • / II li /\ 4LIY I — SW STRCT 4 P GEN E MP e 5 6 HOSPITA —� I I • ORILLIA PROPERTY ASSOCIATES, LIMITED PARTNERSHIP SA-100-85. ; • _ I. , APPLICANT URILLIA PROPERTY ASSOCIATES TOTAL AREA - 11.74 ACRES PRINCIPAL ACCESS LI'ND AVENUE S.W. EXISTIING ZONING M-P;, MANUFACTURING PARK EXISTING USE UNDEVELOPED PROPERTY PROPOSED USE CONSTRUCTION OF THREE, T40-STORY OFFICE BUILDINGS (120,000 SQ. FT. ) COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN MANUFACTURING PARK/MULTIPLE OPTION COMMENTS • • I I \ ,• . 2162Z CITY OF RENTON HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING JANUARY 28, 1986 AGENDA COMMENCING_AT__9:00 A.M.: COUNCIL CHAMBERS, SECOND FLOOR, RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING The applications listed are in order of application number only and not necessarily the order in which they will be heard. Items will be called for hearing at the discretion of the Hearing Examiner. ORILLIA PROPERTY ASSOCIATES, LIMITED PARTNERSHIP Application for site plan approval to allow the construction of three, two-story office buildings totaling 178,605 square feet on an 11.74 acre site, file number SA-100-85; located at the northwest corner of Lind Avenue S.W. and S.W. 39th Street. ORILLIA PROPERTY ASSOCIATES, LIMITED PARTNERSHIP Application for site plan approval to allow the construction of two buildings totaling 153,300 square feet of office space on 10.48 acres of property, file SA-106-85; property located on the north side of S.W. 39th Street at the 800 block. JOHN E. NELSON - c2;*/(71 . ./r ATTORNEY AT LAW �i 601 WEST GOWE S� ®®"L�� FEB KENT, WASHINGTON 98032 p) CITY OF R N'TO'� (206) 854-7200 J January 31 , 1986 J.!;LEAN G,,/ZONi,�i;G; DFPT. Mr. Ron Nelson Building Official Renton Building Department Municipal Building 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 Dear Mr. Nelson: I recently sent a letter to, and had a telephone conversation with, Mr. Don Monaghan of your Engineering Department. He suggested. that I contact you when .I obtained certain information. I am the attorney for Drainage District Number One of King County. The matter relates to the ownership of the District of certain property, other than Springbrook Creek, lying within Burlington Northern Industrial Park Renton II. The ownership of the District runs through Lots 3, 4 and 7 of Block 5.of that Plat. I assume that Mr. Monaghan has discussed this matter, and I will therefore not go into detail . It is my understanding that the ownership of the District is based on a judgment entered in King County Superior Court during a condemnation action for the ditches which are owned by the District. The judgment was entered near the turn of the century. In reviewing the copy of the judgment which I have, I have located what I believe to be verification of that ownership. I have copied three pages of the judgment, and you will find them enclosed. The first page is the cover page, and the second page is the caption page. The third page contains the legal description 'of the property to which I refer. The reference to Lot 4 in Section 30, is obviously a reference to Govern- ment Lot 4 which apparently coincides with the southwest quarter of the southwest quarter of Section 30. The combined descriptions com- prise of a 20 foot wide ditch running from the south section line to Springbrook Creek, and straddling the common section line of Sections 30 and 25. Based on that condemnation appropriation, the District is owner in fee simple of that ditch. Further, as attorney for the District I am not aware that the District has ever deed or released any rights to that section of ditch. This is confirmed, I believe, ;by the fact that the District has been negoti:atiing for some years with Burlington Northern for the exchange of that ditch with another piece of property. It is my understanding that the owner of the adjacent property, and the plat, is Burlington Northern. It is also my understanding and belief that the District was not a party to the plat. On any of the foregoing points, .I stand ready and willing to be corrected if proof otherwise or a faulty memory on my part is shown. However, if the facts are as I view them,. I am concerned that some appropriation 'and. use of this property might be made without the consent of the District. We have never been notified by the owner that they intended to make any use of this property which the District owns. In your process of review of any improvements to this. prop- erty, I would appreciate your taking into consideration the con- cerns of the District. If you have questions or information, I would be glad to talk to you. In the meantime, 'thank you very much for your kind attention. Yours 'ruly, Jack Nelson JN:dd encls. cc: DD #1 D. Monaghan • , ! lit; +. :)es.: k J , • • ✓. �.i�' a .Y'� ;Jl�.0.4'.•l'1^ . 1 , • • ' ` .�•. - , .. - ( - '�,�., •L ,•..ram . . rI.j I. ` ._x ■ Liq • • . {`:.] roy `• r•• t ' • 'i. '• ^ •• +• + ' F �I i }✓ , • .„ . r . � i6.; .:{i.r:. f 'rr ' p. � -.z, SS `• ` 1 ' .• •1,• .:r ;•� ' : , • •• P. ,j .`iq 4 •x . ', + r+ � .1 t� I � � '^ K l�I,y.• q J�. t 7� , , $ �y� ,�� J? , • ,w•it Segf Z• r ;; r1-+' '' '''''`n. c''r , C�%.• -+�..,, ! :,p ...— —' 7x •• . . tif • F ti r.n.7 ,•M. 1 wl ft:., ' Q,rrYi• {I '.. .Oit6s0 4` yu.^firiiii t.,rrlaw it ""• , °. . ,1 rt ;�••r ++te�r t ,. 4. A" f0, :'48Br. ka l.���!yyy��,,,..,gywt tl,.a•-Joe,".. . ' ., r •'. R�..��t�,,:�,�mayt,T� • 1 ' ti.. r'•�, +'�'�ii�� `i.t ' ' ' ' ' • '•' t • t.'„'i f 44 riii 1 7T •.� r ''a:M ••• R:toe !C' ' i•r I, } r r•, r.• fo*4 / ylyi try ` ;4/2- •F �Ocr+ ' f, 1t 0 .ty�.p�t� ,(.fl4Wf►'4i�e,. N ' %7 �Nt: 'i' •,;3x •1' ..'f µ,; '-•'f�t Li �'M. 14 `rT �y ►'tgr.44t.7!'tMt!?IY, ; r tt ,Src,' ,1` t` J+'' 't,F`"'•� + S' ' p...6. -....�,- 'k y�4, :,� rJ io.0 a.. " 'A . ;-f '.t!' r�,. •.� ✓M 1y e►r i u.t1�,-. gr, 1 1 r'•'" w•, b 'i .'..,.1., .,t' • r : if_ • •f :t'i(tr.,t M „`I•:yf.ij •=•'• !• 'Y✓V7l`•,IA1t ♦• !�''r�•f, fir(•• %ir•'"• 1.. ' ! ''..'.'-I.,•,:•'.•4 ••.:•.'[a'''i,'•al,,'—:.:',''t/`il..•• 1 Jt ' .* t,A+1 `N'','y,tr7:�/' I't: e •Ew. ��►!fit ' =•ri.lb, et '• .,.'.•:•* �i, !' a "..• 'W1,,tr * / 4.4'r• k• • {,.1• ! 'Y mot~ r " tA,' r ", t i, a"Z t ,,- t•h 4;.': {rrtr yp, •4, { A,T.71.'4441,' l�4 4 �I aa�;' .4 ,• f r.'* , 1 •r.. ,' 1 *•VR 42A ;M w, � ;l4111•T'` k�;•v•'�M�.� le ;�r4' M1�► ' " •,••u� I• • t: th 1 . �.•, irr• ''.'y." r,p ,,'�?yt•41,a.6f" t t..,y }!r ,I V.a0 ..1 , • S! r a r•. •�' • ,►� -!1/Jy +q+ 'iMfw�,i 31�# ei��y/�,�(4' pi A i•'1 "1'-'' i °''.1 K•5:• fr�•t ' } 4 1 ; t.. f P ,1 4e...,etrA ,% ` f^ .. ^tM.l •.•P../...•i/ 7..,• at . `%.•:0 • .,°.!• „.I ,„, Pl '7 .tiy. •.. . ! •• 9.71 . ';,-...;`;. -% _ - 4.<'.:':..:'_•`,'r;.''s• .' .;1:t.1...L•;t i.�'.4,w iiw,p yq{ ; '•'Y b .:V".!,. J ::!M4V,ni r r•. 'i t' `e4 'pif;e'iil•v - ,Itr ..4.- • If l' ,jam', �'taw . V •., .',;.'1 •�• ;fy1,t ' .' .?':. : '-i'.. ''}I7""'•'. • "*."'.*.,• J 1�•.y1,R? .a ,•• "Ptr'''•v f+ .tail i,. 6•`'.« <A• ,f p. .,--•.z n4 a t! . fit'' '� i7, �Fli :<• 2 Cis.. r '•4. " • { •��5''. , - 1 a a 'O�f r. l 1,�21:,e,• •t- r� a,,. '6':., +-'t'�— ....'�' r*. • 1 .+ ' 'l ( 'f Y' Y ..»ear• rya•t••••Ira iY'!s'lr'. ,,wf'1./1jRl• �''7�i ,..! .i4- ..'• •1 °s.' - � •: •�. 'fI • •' � -'! ' "" Gc'.P.,y 'L�h,ASlr.• •r. �.u' w •, t e 7 1 •4,' is • r .. .,� j��6 �•►, i'.y, ..••�. �� 1•f '"• '1 • t r • 'i: J '•••�itt•yr.,A �.t,",,Al .4,• M.1; ~.,+' +,f1• • • [• �,.. •i •'ti • ^-r4'•.T!T r./�A:•,'•It.('+•.- ' ' .,. Y .: t c r {�4a ,; ylr,.'r.7 " + • y •"•v. -. yI •1 '4°e•�K` ht e '. :! • fit; t f J » • t "` i • 4 . 'CITY OF FEtIlT{C{11''•i• (�'� � • ' '. I'l, u i !1,!•47.;'�{ - ".[[8 , �•:1� ^LI' • •,'• ` }•'fah r ±5 • .{ �!r 4 ' jf. - .. _ • / , : , . .4 ‘ i r' • 7 • rY•ri.., • � t r� z • ryQ „; t > • 7•Cr ilSra.� b �` �:��i �� . - FEB 3 1986 . ��• .. .I tt� ,. • t,•7 {(•' rlt BU!LD!NG/ZON NG DEPT. : . • .. •V• .. . •• .•,.,.• :.r.1.11:C"i-Or'•': 1. '',:.'..-...': ' 1' :I ' ' I:• ...1 11-,•- 1: '''"'•: . . - ‘, •4.I I- I . I, ,",:. :•• ',.', • ., ., --A- ,,:. , ., 1 ',,,i'.•.- .. i ••.- ''.1. . ' ' ; 1 :-, 1,,', ; ' '.• .,*Ai. • -' • • '. • .l. • .. •,-,!.:;y ,s ''.., . . . ; ••11.; 0 : ' . •':!•• '•• , '1 " '. .. , , • . .. .., , •%s I'.*•••, s . .• • . . . • ...so.' • . f --' . . • • • , 1 .L . 1.• . ' .;.,,'' . :. . :• k " • '••'••.•'•' •' -4*C•, 14, 2 .''''''• •••-•. - *;;;;,..:,-',-,e'•••;-.- • .'•-..*:-. -7-,--7-:-.i--------...-%77.! • ' .. . ,,, ,. ...,., ,,..,:::,......:i: . 4,i ,:„ ,,• -,..,..,, _ - -.....:.-: 1,,,...,.,...'.,:„,,,,,,... -.-..;,...'....,.1 1-,-..,',1-,4.,.-:"..!•i',.: •, ;\.....,!,t,;i-.4,..!,.'.7. i±,k, •.-_. •..- , :,'?: . , t.. .! . .;.r,'-, - •--.. •••-•-• ._• -:-.1.- . -....A.,,!::.i”.:._ . . ' .. ''''' ' /' 41'..1':•.; • '..- i.,..,...'-:,•••••••4'".,1:1,;;:itiit..";-: ' :..*.'4'f''''' : i : . .. . .)j', ,1 , .);,..',14,.ii,' , .. .,. :i :••,!' :.: -1,;', ...:.,F.r.; ;"''..."...:•TTIrr'7".' • ...,.•:,-..;!7.1777,117... ,...."It."..'""t"17;;...k.",. '7.;": . •' :".,1,-• , ,.,:n •., ,_ '1•, ,:•". ,,. ,'.. .. .i..1t1i! ,f4- ' .;•,...._ ••••74.`•.•-•!•'••r7",-•'^.--;.,.,;',,:•;:,.,,..,...;,:,,,,,,,„ ",'•...,•4,,,-.,.....i..M.:,,X.Z^,..,:ig,n,`. ,,,'1''?,`,:1,, ,14..,i, 1p . , • . .... ' ' ,. ' • i -, 1: - . , +r t.,'.,•,. • ••VtIlfh.4.itrywc,r,,r..,3.7,m7.91,,x,',.',-;,,•,'•itTidaiiliii,.;-•I'fft,,4:10,21-,, ..,.., ,. . _ ,..-..,,. .• : • .. .'''''•••,.......' , ',•. . , . •,..*-• I A?• .„,ifiggx,,,,,,<..0.,-.17,....,..g..,..k,.';v..; •ie,,‘1,..7r,; .gr,,,,, .; 4.,y.,,,• r P ,,,_,7 . fq0.4),,.,,,... ,i.„41-4,464. • . . . , • ,,,, • ..,,, .,.. ., ;;,..,...., ., • .. .,-,.,.,.t,f.....,. ........i 6'i,t„....,,,,,::-....:z.,..-•,,%.•tik.,,:::4•14,ty:A,,4.1.i..).,:-00",oti,4 P. Il;:g...t;,,,..;i:,),,r.....1.;;;N44.,,v:;.:,• '.-r::,:1,' '. ..t ,`- ''' ,,.' ' • 1 . ., „' ,„..4,1 kir .:•r''..•3 fri,..!•):4,!,••A...,-%:-........,,..,.e.,•,),:'4,4.i..3•••.x.4,16, i .f.r.0-14, ••••-?••:qqtrA,)1, ••0,x,.r..,t,,, .1 ••-•), .vy.,,..•,-,,,, . .. • "• .,...i. .-• ,. •..i....,,,,,,i. •.,.....•:.••. •..,,,,,,,,. -.; ... As7,•.",?,1•••• •:sof ..„i.z,' .w.2.7:: , ' ,..::,1• ,...,•'.>;&••,,, ,1•2 • 9• .•,yr, .,..“ '..c e,..0•1?",''. • ,, ,. • •‘. ., , • . , . .,:•' •„,. '.• t•:. 1'7.'---'. ••','' _ 'i'siiiia' i• '1, ':}F. 1B1014Xnarep?„:014•41/421$;0468. M*t0•1.43.041-•, i • . .. ; • '',1,:`:...1:64-421,-1‘', i.•,., t„, • . ' 1 .1 . '. •...tr, ,"‘'`:•. i••••'t•f':.1",'4i,,•d'Gt'41.%••nt'•• f**V•',:'•'',•`••••••••'•‘I'' •:,•<.:::,•:,,,,,,,.4,,71;,,,'•,;,,,-,.ir.J.,,-. .,'i•,.. - ,.,e-44,4 . ',I:1i.: . . ' '; , ' ' ; • O •. • •--•,, wei,p,,, •- .!..,,..';*i...1*--..x,,,n,S1,,,.!„„;,',,,,„„,,i!i!..;,...,P.•ki'..4411,',Ii34.,:k)4..:.:•,,c.v4 ytt; 4,,,,‘,.-c„. . ,,,,,...-;, _,- ,. ,,,..,. ; ,' ,%, -...,..,,,,,,,•...,(. •••••:,-1..s.,..r.... ..,.., 44,5tit,1•.,,..e,,-...,,1*:10;16;,,:!..,:.,:) .:•; ;;I:.71..4,„,...,t7,„ .71,',.*(f.t'..4..',1,..1i.,'.,' ,W,ft.itRi.'' 1...rittP•71'i‘C.:, -, -.... , . .. . •, . .,. ...1kr}tr, ' '. ' •'' .'•'. . ' 1. • '1"eti\i'l.41$' 'il c'4..e ir01.T:,'/4)11,4,:Aq:,‘t1'..t'::21!7'441.ii44r-4 !:. . .711.IVI:t3741:k A.: '., ••••/• T •-'`. .4•1 • . " ' • • I' 'rt • -,s.s. ,,,. p• • - -t-• -. '-,•••-„,, , ....'.4 : .-••• '. -.,•44,q .,-- "4,,,'.••i-;.••A,,,,,,g0,404-0 ,:-..,. . E.,, .,.•‘, .. ..... , 1 A. -,.,_ ,..,.r..,,,. ‘,......, •••, . -• • .,. .• ....A....,. • a -:,.'....,', ,..-a i','e,'.:-.34.'Oil')''.v4Vi.irht,i,?:.a.'1',.,s .,pt,s4e LK-, . -.• l'••:;49,, ' •' 7 ••'•I • •••• • ,avitiesri igl• ' • ":" s'' - •••••`.1r;7.'"Ogt-fri: 1440: '• t' -•.-'.-"••••--^'14-C••'41(''' ';'41' • • C 4 . ;;, ! ..0 . oo i.'it1t.740 otP •cut: ........,....!•:, ;•:„ ,--„?.• ,,:.,•,4•T'trii,L., i;.4..!,6,,,,,' •'...:-.,:,..'•••Pli •;1 r..f e:''.... . . ' - 1": • t. ..,.,..,.•.,,,,17,,,Ita•rt i: *Ilion as the Board ar a • - ..,I.,,,;,'-.:4:,%,-•',..,-.,..,,,•• •,..--,..c...,..`,..• - t.,,t,i,• .,•••••' '• --"'"/ .4i• '4.-4' • • • I , • , 0 ,.:,,r t : '' fsx.I.A3,,,::.... , • -• . . 1- , .,,,, , [,.•v , 4.47,-coma, otteiro,ot Drottifee. D.11.tr41':.!;Tr;iii,i-i',.-:: 1''.•{,4;a:';:?:`4:....11,r,..06.Jt .3.:tiif,livrt,...,,' ,. priCtfigo,J.-atotio.-ot CL':•,;''..,,... -'f...--7".:,..i'..';At!..ii„•-•-,,,.",!11..4'.%.7•:,.....i. ...1;,-4..z. .' .- .....,.„, . • . -•• ','.'i'.....A. L, , ?.: ..,-,.',, t . • , •. '...T ,.ii 0,1.4Lr:::,.''4.'irti...%a a''' ; A a'....'''''A'14/,*.‘11/7' AP:,• VOV'tt,,'. ''la'. •..... '..- -A •- -•,-.1.. .s,••• • . •..• , . .• - • '..: ••• ...; i .4.....v.• %.' n 0.:'i,l'A;,1,, 4,5;,Y.. .-;!'...1..':,.8.441a, Pka,4411P.';i+;?,..4;)CIA! r,r:;.:,,;;-...A....,,,i114,,a4r,),3.,r' ..,' ',„ . ;„, .,., , , , •., i. : , , -.,, - , . ,.„:.,,. ri"e;;44 '.' ,',,,,Ii..0•11,1,.?,,::-.vaiv)kf.••,:,•••,..:;,,,,v,;....1,,,•,,';',.,:•,§111?4,i0,-..;;;J.,k.:44,,,-,pfi.y.:i•kci- .-y.11,.--.:,, - ,,,,,, ,- . ,,.-., - -., : • - •••:' - ?•%1.. -4.1-•"'l '74/.1" ',11,'....;41',Ali•- or..,....:.''',.,. '' ".•;-•'•q!"`''' ...:%*1•4iTr'44':: ..-•f',r it A• •..'''t': ,''.'--.'S.`.''I.'''..'.':,!•.''.-:>:-'.,.-.,.,-.:1''...'.:'..;:•'*:.,'..-:..t''.•''',•,•'•,'*',',',).•',..:•••.•i.•m'•".'"•'..'.'.'i'r1',.,.',,',,''-'-.1•'1,3.,,I.1.4'0tI.N13VI,,,4;1A?•.-...JW., ,'*'N,4,:..,ys,i,,,Iv..p4.....,.,t--T;,P••••.iL,.i1,„,-$1,W'▪ ,.....k)i,:,,P,F to,t•P,4•u,.•”r,,1. „-:.:‘A;r,..ls•.,•„'Tg,w..-,-icinrn i'fg w a.-I:s-Z-,-.: -•r:...,.o7,4,.-,',,.r t...4..'ot...7..,...,t.4!-!.-O,,!"!...!-.'''!r!,..4-,•t!,!.,,.,',,,1...'l'r...,'.'..a-,.-'p.,...,i-,1,,yr.,,.;;,p,'''Ak.t-,4..1'V-..':i,''t,.':..:'4.,..,:.',,,i:.t,,:;-,,S.4_.,'i,t,4,,..pz.-k.,.,...i fii.ii..'.,•,'.',l,:.',,-•i t':.1f,,•.,:.,.v:;:..t',:.`.,F,.t.'c1.0:.',.I/-,••.s.•..•.••,:::...;.t.''go,.3".,1i-,ps•'1;..,,i,a-;,,..-i,„C•ir1..'.i.-1i,,.,4..',..4;...,!,,:'."o.1,,,-,y,,',.-1.,.,.r.•'.v•1•--.,-i...•....•'.-„.1-g.'-e,4'•...,. '.,'.•e..Y.a:..:-',:..n•,.&..,'..,1•ii,.-,..:t',•.1 1f'';.':.1 6.._,,i...,,1%ii.0,,.f,,.4.,,..'„.t'..'1-4„.•,,,.'.'.,i0,.•'.•,.,.4'.,,4,.,T.,4a,.;,,4'..'.`-„...;Tt,4.'-71.."4..7..d,,..,.'7,,.1,..,-'.,•,;,-',,tht.•,,1to„*.1,'.•s.1`,,1 . ;.J.:...,',.•-'.-.".:.-..-.V,.''•'..'•,...,.`...:, 7 ,,., .1:•.•!••••:'. •• . • .. '' ittr,.•Pf4-.1";.'"•(••,• e? .., •‘ ' • -• - - s • ' i• •' '"- n''•.,•.•,--:is i••4b,,.1.'•-•'n:e•s)1-4 •'••••,'•-,'‘...'•••,,r1*Vb,Ss-.1'445:••3511 s'• 4:' fsl•f?:`• .':, .1 ;••''"1- % • •••• IA .i;-•4'. -.,. i'•" r;i1;••.4".• •‘'' t %•i'%'1111F4R11,0'49,11, 441.111P4 MINS difidate • flli t'.. ..•:-:•r•Ssrp!*4.:t•;•,•••s•';••..set.;11,04,,,Tit,4-,: -....-livg,r ‘ i ' ..'':‘, ''.. ..'zi;S;, ! . . , ‘1., ..r•,... ,• •;A:..(0.,, ;•-e.,,.,,,... ,:...''.• ':. • .--,. -,,,r It: ^ I.:•..,,•, .,.. •.',•-',...-•:.,•!•,••-i‘.,...":,,,,74'•::,,,,s72:-'.••••'‘..••• ' ,-.4••••••";...• ‘• ' TEE ' ., ••.- .gill -,. ..Oro*awl P. c. iivss;!:,Csitiuntb4 lls.,furl SollWii,111111ste011111.0" '... < , • •• .:••;•-•' .., '.. . : !' : ; ',. '.' , ,, '4,.`•,,,;•+•' 4:9 t lirlq:01101.0• FeCpefild0114'Ws•Ks1Gresia Wilder!!Es4ttiCOPIPVIIY•41 tx.RPors100:4 .4'4: • 't-A:,..•,if ._., . ..i' :;•-•,,,:: • ; ;. '. •,,.. : '1- . .---; th,i-'.1.., ' . ..a.t' • ... '., ....,.„,,Tg'... 1.......:,:.,,,up...,,7 , ti,:. -,..17.41p0..),;1p; NOtrrriitids Arartricr !amigo:y-11u*.".&miss corms:Runt . '•• ..,fill ,'17!i 4 i, i ,..;.1,. .z,,,,;...,..,„......t.::.; , .0....0.",,, . ....01:40,1,..„fuo;Niels P. parses I.Ilarlin Nelson; N. J.::Parkeek)•Ifrtry,J11101.1 -`".,',i r. ,, ,..., ••it!,":''•• .' <','.....'..' •''.,;'.., ! ''' .;',.'.''' ';: ,•'',,-' 11,1. N ....... .,141;tri.r.T,Ire.4'itirti•prflith.j'Nary E. Listau. klarortairt...j...I.Igi' .:•,,,T.r. .,. , •: ' •A:• . • • . , • r i ' •• .., '.....'•''-`1.....'i..i.;;•;•'i•I I ';'•••.A•••''; • • ' :TAJO'S&41.,I$Ilrp. Minor Heirs of John Richard-kar".deceria,ed.and James*, -• i- ,•, ,, , ' .,e,,,..,,,.. „ls• -•-• ' tis... walsacher Brothers 11/4 Company. a corporation;'Martin h1iarit. • . .i •N..,.,,,V,. I:.i. ,i,••,•,,.;; • -.. ! t.• • :.- 1.oajtoton;C:'R. Patterson; Margret NtIone; George ;IelSay."iss,',. •..‘,.,;,„4,....,. , •.0114 '. . • • ' - '' j •• ',' • :•••.:;:ji-,14:,••,"(t: '1111:1:',..„.:.: ...'.wiliimik arm`of the,.Estote oj Neils.Andrrson.deceased-Hrrman helsow: '', .4 r •. ; r. ^ .t ...a,•;•51,17,1;::•;•,...; 'P.'. 41.41.t....; •,c-•,'•'!'"1-r C.'Petrrson; C. &larding; M. kleltougall;G.Winston:J.S.Unit!.4/4411114.S'ic.I.6 ,'.i. il, .,t,.4 , ,., •.. , ,4 1.!' ).1, ', !, . .: s.1"C 7-'1,4.,„,..T4 41101.1 Me 11.'Jnhrtant;("qv 114111 Andrew J. Anderson; Lyrist!. ti..gpginftitiolv:akA: ,'-`,.?•!::. . • .....„:.,-,..,,,... - - , •..., f • ,,,a'"i -,I•' -''..!PA. .••„ ••••k . • •. :,-•,...1;.,,,,i., ,,...,,,s.0.7 ! -•s‘4.:,...,:s.. •...,,JilifOlfil;I.. Nienge;Agnes pridges;Ruben Widget.: Robert•Utah's:Oil:R. _ ;•,-.: 1,1414!,FiTt.... ' .... , ,..,:-..•/...,,,.,, t' • :...1" -I' 4'..ftl rI, '' :',.'-••••-'•• .,..,:•-`-•:•,•,a ry:.‘• Soeteway; August:Speteway t Frank Terrace;Jtrerlah, . DWYr f ' ,. fr-: •• , '," ,'• : • ••••• '' • - ,..., .. . ...,•••••,,i,.. ,f,.;•... ,,,,..-;..,.i • . ''';.. ..''' R.iiiiiichiki Brothers. a corporation:4. P.-rtotaling•CorpanY'QM Pull'4'..1clt,'ll'PAr I': \-......' ••-• t.',' ''••••• l• 1 ., `. ',. .. 1,..,,;..13;:‘,. •. '• thin;J. NI. Loren:•Willsom•CaWbrane;-J. RI Kerlin: I..;W.- Wilton i'.V.IV' ilpisC __*.,' 44v.. • ' ' . , ' • '2..:. j. '. [ , ...,..1.';;;To-,caci.:•,:t:',;:fj.;. '''"'",:.•,....-.. (i'liven.'I larrirt j. Hoyt: NI sty li.Crites;Emma H. Root i Cordelia lir'. ..',. , 11.1.1O'!.51:0 '•,' !•'' '• ''' '.'', '-'''••';'•'.1 1 A1%4:-....;‹,,:%.''..-.''',-;' , '- • • II. ;Immo 1; samort. R:-Furth': Join-Cosirlin; John Rine':'Emily 'Il.'.' once:""AO41114"4-1,,.:,::: '.''.•: !,..:•";; • ., 5., <-....?•:."., ,•.•,..:',I-;';4.I?."-,.', ••.: - , ' • 1 • -.- .':'1•';'.'''...... '',..,,.'z.;"; Julius loucke:John,Nelson;Robert Rollout'.Robert Hrodie foetiossr;`n 7.04', :2‘'F ' ,..','•?,,1:.''''... 1 t^."., . ..... ....c,,, . -,, . A; ...`"onk.,••-',. ',,%.,.I..,f..,,: .. t. Ron Ale x si:•11-1 (;itiltrie:; t he'Rol foul't'gut lob: I.,irstment Company.:rt corfoirollott' N;:.'.,I4.4,:4-4, ';i,...> : '.: . 1,,,..,..,;'.; :;;,:,,• ; "F ' -,..,‘,..,'.'";.„‘''1,',,i•;.; ; .,-.:•. 0..,",;,(:,,,,m,i- yittior NI. t,:assell,'Iirtir;f.,,Johnson' Hillis•F. 1-atimer, 144 11;0 3iiillhIp1 Ct.',-,,,4,-1 .- ' '''-'''''.-':':"1.'.'-• .,;I:itinter.11.'4'4 iiii4:11..N.. A 1.I.Miner tiniintstrator'sd'the Einote'nf•W IMAM M-1..ittluter,'711cr:tg:,•'• ' - : < . '..'''• .. .,„. .. • • .....:,..,,,,4,-,7.•.,0;‘. !,. I; III,j.lm Henry.;,c, A ItIoro•Atultew t Aeon; H. K: KA•alutid'-ThOKIIIII,Markt T;..pir;:ii. , , .,, ,...6.;..,,.3....r.-; VC- I:gtrkelimattg (ircen; rirst--Nso”:tal,flutter to,..!7••eat;Ir:a carpal:11ton;01;we 11,4140:, -4 s --17__ e ..1 ----- ` :-'-:-:--- I.:: ,..; .. , , .....,,,-,4.-2:-,..... --rif‘---- -:1?•,,s.'-:' ••• ' • .-, .i . ----,...,,.: ..,.....-. ..- - ,-• .......-.-.5-: i'.,f).::,,1..Nitele,• .V.,11-arliburtr: Ala, ,s Lou:ming,•:,(-hark! 1.4,Taylegr i SI. 11'.'Woltrmult(if., ,a.: .. .,..:1 ,.. 1., ,..:, .-:..,...:-...,.. .. . .. __ _ __•..... R,..L.,....F ra,IrcA.A. Ruins It.,: P. Pratt;A.11. .Walreittan; Prink'Atha nor e-Ttwestoilgielt ! •.',.--;..V-- •.- .., L •.' i l• ..,, : .... ,- ,-. ,,. .- .J.'..:.:',•.:•:,•••:--.,--,;,-,1-,...4,-, .;-4.!,.F.11..r!...4,,l+-1# ..,.L..1,,.f!,,,..!!isv.fk.,,,,,!JOIAnietft.ittet,ol.iirelSesfIrtfc-tv. ' '' • • • . . , . ,., , . .:......,. - •.. •:,. Rust .5.;1:10,,......4<...0.,..1•, Nt Litr.1%rivr LtNr;ngt t.littr.it;ali.a.ptg:.+Ail'ill; I-•,-4.41;••:',.t?;11.E;Li• • 'l• 1 •. . -, 1,..,,,1 , , ;, • '11.'...1-••',--:::.J.:y.::11:o...1 J.-it hero Mg: Laura-A.-I lotol,;•klipsy Shrai.1,;,,A:'Neclx i 4 K„),:.<,5!;14:1.-")).',..'14 .. 1 ••--I • - . •< , -•, -.. ,,•-• ‘, t.....tio...,:c, 11. I.,%%sisrile.: S. S. Smith:.t. .1glr4it:-Ann;e Tarifa':'Atari'!hi ,': 5 ...,,.. *'i:..!''.4. 1 i,. “II it..ru.•• I it; "had 1 1.,' (.1ria I) 4 Oiltm.m'•'iM,A- mi,chell. (-1;5..., vd,.?i „min... , - •' ' . • " :4. : • {, .,... •i' ....1...%,...,....:,,,,,.•..; .;:,,,, 7.• , ,,, _, ,, .....i \ ..,,irlIn.. \an .It- %gritty!'St" k J.4tti,.4 puporsrtitor;.Nirs.•11.G.Jrnion 4;Julius t.i.tel ,. ':. ',"•••••`. "-.\-•-.':.::`. '„:',, ;,`• .i..,.....;. sii. •-,,,.•::!;."-,"-;••.' ';''''-' ',1.:,' ...-o!'..h..'t•am..r;-`...1,'Re:Ii-kkeimer.:-,JE-..,:Ning;•.1-14 II. Its wthortte;:„.1.,.P.-Clonily;-11:.' : '„ i.,'''; - ,.•-,", •,i-.;• ;";,;"..;..,,,,. i •.. ,. :•;.;::',..,•'A;",,,;•,,:,..4". :,'. ••. ; .....-: ••'. 3.. II,'k•alt•ir;Nan,- II :Th;%1 art, ,\.1rItt.;;.tratrix r,( the.ltat.,..of John .1', *wart.-- ,' . ''.;'''''' ''I., : 1,'?u,,‘•‘; ,'.i.-..,-..-,' .--': .- • •-. .'--' -..•,..III•• .% I.haniltrn.; 1{,gt.g.rt LjgaittIterr; .J. K. Foster: 0." T''.• True- ; ': . • .,•I''. - '`I.', ''',--•,%,..;•'•... . , ).• •,''''1'....;.•.,'4'.. - "i,';, '- --. ..0-'',. 1-,',••-- 1,; .• . •,t r ,er.il• *.%. R..,4 ---:-. li.gss. -=-- Itgl,`,. and .--•-- RCM% (whose first.names are•sin i •I'',;•,:,.:1....,:.'4i'?....- ''`` I•••••••1..1 1.; 1.1a..,iitr.t.-Iwip. oi tt. R itn..... ,Ic....:-aseil,:•.S.,.P.. Wiltior; 'AC Arillio.;'.Nlary'''I: ...-.: :' - ;-' '•',: ' .. •••' .'•.•:::'' il' 'i'-,. ...,;.i,;1;,•; ,,r3..;',....Ci•'•Y•• ..••;.,., .., . .-.1.....9., It• It' )1•111114; t'hat I. I iv%itt.. %.‘ I'. StephenroW: S. l'. III.real Sarah Alit! ' ' ' : .- " .i '' .11'.. '•A'•-• - • •. 5.- ,-.. r:.<•--.'..i.:-.,•• "•:'•'..-:-'•::.r . . ' -...."- .'-I ti.. ..;.‘..; t t J it; .'llonti; limits C.-(iiii.ert; ItOsiodo Jacobi; Rebecco.C. •-J• l' '','. .-: •-• v" .o.. ,ifi• . 1, • -•••,,,, ; ...... .,,...,...;f4.• . . ' ,..,; . , , .t,..,•in.tie. jaws II in: J.,IM It 41: l'eter Netarm; Nancy 4. Gin;• pime4.',1w • :,::., . ,., • ::,........, ,,. t- •-•:•':.,. ., • ••:,/,::i.i...•, --...i.:. ‘1.•:1•:•.1. willitt: Scraphin Kntiwn; I. ;Ammon;.;tpke Ci3ortnev-',M, tnriglit; K.•I:. •.,.....,2,:, ; .,; ..:•.• "...,.....::, .;,':•,-..-..';'!".• • ', .. ,...,..‘.1...9.,p..,- ts'...r,: . • ,,•,,'...b;?).1;....4y'.,.....Y.,: • ' . ,. ., . .10.....,n. :,...,I.,),:t.4%zin.Jaen, : Colvin:P. F.Ole;P. J._Ol,;().T) Berg i_4, )11 OM: .., ..c.,".,,,e ...,,•,.. -,,•r•:11,:::i•ft'...,.,•:„..,.....::, ,•• , : • •. ,„. ,...., r,. •-: •„ ... -.„•.J,;•••,,.,4..,..;,:•,,,,.,.• „ - . 1 E g 'fly; A. II. S.,p,r; George IL-61:_ette.,;•;."' Pall;-Grow-Wald; Ai it y..0 • : ••'04..1.5... ' ,: ,...,....; 1.. .-.,•41 •''..;!... •'.,-;..'•'',I'.; , . 4+'. .... ...."....- t •;i';•'':1:::;..i.1.,..,."No2'A',.:•1 i• • • . -., .,..: •••,, ' .v.,' .• 43 i-- .. .-:-..----- . . • .• , i . . ;4' •• • '• ••.'...•"i••••••••••i'ti•sil•••45'.•••:•••• .*'..):•''.••'''''1. : -.....i...;14;;;;,444/14 .4.41,..1.••;•, ... .,.•,••.•,1..y...•••(..• ,,...1,44.. ,at.,.,,t,:*40”.•• ..••.... • ....4...,3446...146,-.....1,,:,,,,,.,-,,."', !.', ,,,... • .5 ,'..-4 ,.,1. ,4:,...t..,.y,..1''.1. ,....,..,.0,,,:i..f1,1 /i:.//•:1,,,, . . 1.1 et 1. 14,0o '{....t1 n.'.4.I:r...1...1.'.W.t'. '.;'i '•j - •....•..-...i •..; ' '.'. ,.•'. ;:.01..f•I,.!,...;•..,,.3.,,r-1...',,,.•,.‘,.•.1..., 14' ' ';-',••• ;•• .. ;•.. , •.. I' ' 'i.1.1 41 i..-;"hi;...41;0•••.'1.4'1. . .•.. '' ...II ; ! . .,: • • •i.• .'" '• • ''' ' " . • ' . , . t' ••,. _______,_ :.. . .. . .. . .. .. .. ... , t. . •, • • , . : ; -. .t. . „ . . . , ..'' • •• • • • . . ., . .' , ,. . . • . . . . . .. . • •• • • . • , , •• • . - • . . ,. . ..• - . 2162Z CITY OF RENTON HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING JANUARY 28, 1986 AGENDA COMMENCING_A_T-9:00_ COUNCIL CHAMBERS, SECOND FLOOR, RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING The applications listed are in order of application number only and not necessarily the order in which they will be heard. Items will be called for hearing at the discretion of the Hearing Examiner. ORILLIA PROPERTY ASSOCIATES, LIMITED PARTNERSHIP Application for site plan approval to allow the construction of three, two-story office buildings totaling 178,605 square feet on an 11.74 acre site, file number SA-100-85; located at the northwest corner of Lind Avenue S.W. and S.W. 39th Street. ORILLIA PROPERTY ASSOCIATES, LIMITED PARTNERSHIP Application for site plan approval to allow the construction of two buildings totaling 153,300 square feet of office space on 10.48 acres of property, file SA-106-85; property located on the north side of S.W. 39th Street at the 800 block. ;_ ! 2125Z BUILDING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING JANUARY 28, 1986 APPLICANT: ORILLIA PROPERTY ASSOCIATES, LIMITED PARTNERSHIP FILE NUMBER: SA-100-85 A. SUMMARY & PURPOSE OF REQUEST: The applicant seeks site plan approval to allow the construction of three, two-story office buildings totaling 178,605 square feet on an 11.74 acre site. B. GENERAL INFORMATION: 1. Owner of Record: Orillia Property Associates, Limited Partnership • 2. Applicant: Orillia Property Associates 3. Location: Located at the northwest corner of (Vicinity Map Attached) Lind Avenue S.W. and S.W. 39th Street 4. Existing Zoning: M-P, Manufacturing Park 5. Existing Zoning in the Area: M-P, Manufacturing Park 6. Comprehensive Land Use Plan: Manufacturing Park/Multiple Option 7. Size of Property: t 11.74 acres 8. Access: Lind Avenue S.W. S.W. 39th Street 9. Land Use: Undeveloped property 10. Neighborhood Characteristics: North: Undeveloped property: manufacturing uses East: Undeveloped property South: Parking Lot/Office Manufacturing Uses West: Undeveloped property C. HISTORY/BACKGROUND: Action File Ordinance Date Annexation --- 1745 April 4, 1959 • Corrected --- 1764 • • May 19, 1959 • Corrected --- 1928 Dec. 12, 1961 • Rezone (G to M-P) R-560-69 2533 Dec. 22, 1969 Special Permit SP-812-75 --- Nov. 26, 1975 D. PUBLIC SERVICES: 1. Utilities: a. Water: A 16-inch water line is located along Lind Avenue S.W. and a 12-inch water line is located along S.W. 39th Street. b. Sewer: An 8-inch sanitary sewer line is located along Lind Avenue S.W. adjacent to the east property line of the subject site. c. Storm Water Drainage: Storm water drains into constructed storm drains which then drain into Springbrook Creek and the P-1 Channel. 2. Fire Protection: Provided by the City of Renton as per ordinance requirements. PRELIMINARY REPORT rr, THE HEARING EXAMINER ORILLIA PROPERTY AS ',IATES, LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, =.E NO. SA-100-85 { JANUARY 28, 1986 PAGE 2 3. Transit: Metro Transit Route No. 199 operates along Lind Avenue S.W. adjacent to the subject property. { 4. Schools: a. Elementary Schools: N/A b. Middle Schools: N/A c. High Schools: N/A 5. Recreation: Passive recreation areas will be provided on-site. Active recreation areas are located within a three-mile radius of the subject property. E. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE ZONING CODE: 1. Section 4-730, Manufacturing Park (M-P). 2. Section 4-744(F)(2), Green River Valley Landscaping Requirements. F. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR OTHER OFFICIAL CITY DOCUMENT: 1. Industrial Goal and Objectives, Policies Element, City of Renton Comprehensive Plan Compendium, January 1985, p. 18-19. , I 2. Valley Comprehensive Plan, City of Renton Comprehensive Plan Compendium, January 1985, p. 31-50. G. DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS: 1. The applicant, Orillia Property Associates, Limited Partnership, is requesting site plan approval to construct three, two story office buildings totaling 178,605 square feet on an 11.74 acre site for the Boeing Electronics Company 2. The site is bordered on the east by Lind Avenue S.W. and on the South by S.WJ 39th Street. Access will be primarily from S.W. 39th Street. The three buildings will focus towards the south. 3. ' The Environmental Review Committee has issued a declaration of non-significance. The appeal period will expire on Monday, January 27, 1986. In addition, the ERC imposed the following conditions under their substantive authority [Section 4-2822(D)]: 1. Installation of intersection improvements at Lind Avenue S.W. and S.W. 39th Street including a traffic signal and lane widening;per Public Works Department approval. 2. The Public Works Department shall submit to the ERC by January 27, 1986, an area-wide traffic and circulation study bounded by South 180th on the south, SR-167 on the east, SR-181 on the west, and I-405 on the north, along with the extension of Oakesdale Avenue S.W. to SR-900. The study shall identify: (a) a circulation system adequate to accommodate motor vehicle traffic locally generated in the study area at build-out office park intensity, (b) the total estimated cost of that system, (c) the total trip generation associated with said office park development, (d) an estimate of the per trip cost of constructing the,system, (e) a list of those elements of the system which have already been constructed or committed to by pending developers and who receives credit (on a trip basis) for the cost of that construction: and, (f) a prioritization of the construction projects needed in the immediate future to minimize the impact of developments currently being proposed in the study area. •PRELIMINARY REPORT THE HEARING EXAMINER ORILLIA PROPERTY ASSOCIATES, LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, FILE NO. SA-100-85 JANUARY 28, 1986 PAGE 3 3. Participation area-wide traffic improvements identified by the above traffic study to the project's proportionate share based upon estimated daily traffic generation as calculated by standards established in the Institute of Traffic Engineers Trip Generation Manual. The ultimate costs per vehicle trip shall not exceed $175 per trip. (Estimated 2,144 vehicle trips). 4. Credit for adjacent signalization at S.W. 39th Street and Lind Avenue S.W. will be credited against the project's projected proportionate impact and for other scheduled area-wide improvements if the applicant proceeds to complete instead of the City constructing those improvements. 4. Various City Departments have reviewed both the intitial proprosal of 170,000 sq. ft. of office space oriented towards Lind Ave. S.W. and the revision of 178,605 sq. ft. oriented towards S.W. 39th Street. Their combined comments area as follows: • Building Division: Approved December 2, 1985 and January 2, 1986. • Fire Prevention: Approved with conditions. (1) A few planter islands need modification to provide adequate fire access roadway widths. (see plan) (2) Water utility plan will be required after detailed construction drawing are submitted based on site plan drawing info preliminary fire flow required is 2500 GPM. Hydrants on site plan are adequate in number. (Same Comments 1-14-86) • Policy Development: Approved. (1) the proposed office uses are consistent w/the Manufacturing Park/Multiple Option land use designation of the Comprehensive Plan. (2) these uses are compatible w/the existing uses in the vicinity and the office-park theme is consistent with the emerging trend in the Green River Valley. (3) the proposed circulation pattern may benefit from additional discussion.(12/3/85) (1/7/86-The reorientation of the buildings is not a significant change.) • Police Department: Approved. 11-19-85. • Utility Engineering: Not Approved (1) Needs approved utility plans (2) System Development Charge(Water) $0.04/sq.ft. 170,000 sq.ft. = $6,800.00 (3) System Development Charge(Sewer) $0.04/sq.ft. 170,000 sq.ft. = $6,800.00 (4) Lay out - OK (11-25-85) NOTE: CALCULATION WITH HAVE TO BE REDONE FOR 178,605 sq.ft. • Parks and Recreation: Approved 11/20/85 • Engineering Division: Approved with Conditions. (1) Submit detailed grading & drainage plans (detention & T.E.C.P) (2) Submit offsite improvement plan. 11-25-85 ° PRELIMINARY REPORT THE HEARING EXAMINER I ORILLIA PROPERTY AS'1,, ,IATES, LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, r ILE NO. SA-100-85 JANUARY 28, 1986 PAGE 4 • Traffic Engineering: Approved with Conditions. (1) Driveway entrances to be 30 feet in width. (2) Provide off-site improvement plans showing locations of existing street lights in relation to proposed driveway locations. (3) Developer to promote ride-sharing and transit usage as condition of development. (4) Left-turn channelization required for Lind Ave. at S.W. 39th Street and any roadway widening to accommodate,the channelization as part of the off-site improvement. (5) Signalization of Lind Ave. S.W. and S.W. 41st Street required as part of the overall development on S.W. 39th Street. s, (6) Provide two-way centerline left-turn channelization on Lind Ave. S.W. opposite the two driveway entrances off Lind'' Ave. S.W. Include all necessary roadway widening. (7) Provide traffic engineering analysis for traffic signal warrant at the intersection of Lind Ave. SW & SW 39th Street. Traffic signal will be required if warrants are met or near being met. 11-26-85 Jan. 2, 1986 (Revised Comments to Building Division) r ' (8) Above items to be accomplished before construction. (9) Most northerly driveway on Lind Ave. S.W. not allowed. (10) Impact analysis required for remaining two driveways on Lind Ave. S.W. 4. In the review of a site plan, the staff and the Hearing Examiner should normally consider the following criteria; • Compatability of Adjacent Structures • Compliance with the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code • Access (both general and emergency) • Functionality of the Parking Lot • Traffic Circulation (both on-site and off-site) • Pedestrian Circulation • Usable Public Open Space • On-site recreation Compatability of Adjacent Structures: The subject site is located in an area that is undergoing a rapid transition from undeveloped property to high intensity office/manufacturing park uses. The development by Boeing Electronics Company(BECO) of a major corporate facility has todate been in the form of remodeling existing structures. Total planned development by BEC will include: (1) 1.0 million sq.ft. of manufacturing (2) 266,000 sq.ft. of remodeled office space plus 1,000 parking spaces (3) 331,000 sq.ft. of new office space(Orillia Properties) BECO will establish the office park identity for the area. Thus it is compatible with the established development patterns to the south. Compliance with the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code: The proposed use is in compliance with the intent of the Comprehensive Plan land use designation of Manufacturing Park/Multiple Option and the zoning classification of Manufacturing Park. However, the proposal,does not specifically comply with the access objectives of the Valley Plan (discussed in Access below). Access: The discussion on access must address both public access and emergency access. The primary problem with access is along Lind Avenue S.W. The Comprehensive Plan states: (1) The number of access points on individual sites should be minimized., (2) Along arterial routes, direct access to individual sites should occur only when alternate access via secondary streets is unavailable. (3) At-grade railroad crossings should be minimized and should be designed with safety as the primary considereration. 7 � 6 < • '•PRELIMINARY REPORT THE HEARING EXAMINER �ORILLIA PROPERTY AS i it.t:IATES, LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, r ILE NO. SA-100-85 JANUARY 28, 1986 PAGE 5 The Public Works Department has recommended that the northern curb cut on Lind Ave. S.W. be eliminated because it is too close to the adjacent railroad crossing, only 28 feet to the north. The Comprehensive Plan (page 40, Compendium-Jan. 1985) states that no access should be allowed on Lind Ave. S.W. because access is available to S.W. 39th Street. If access is allowed on Lind Ave. S.W. extensive street improvements would be need, which might ultimately include signalization. Eventhough the traffic improvements might be economically feasable, they should probably not be allowed. This situation is similar to the Vyzis Company site approval. SA-069-85, and Valley Office Park, SA-038-85, located to the north on Lind Ave. S.W.;however, each case must be individually judged. Since the center curb cut provides ultimate access to the property to the west (SA-106-85) and is part of the same BECO manufacturing plant limited access in the form of right-in/right-out turning movements should be allowed. The other two curb-cuts should be chained, gated, or fenced for emergency access only. Functionality of the Parking Lot: The parking lot has critical design problems as it relates to turning radius for emergency vehicles and conflicting manuevering patterns in main internal circulation cooridors. Modifications to landscaping islands will have to occur to provide proper turning radius for firetrucks. This will probably result in the loss of 15 to 20 parking spaces because of the redesign. One major design problem is the location of the central east-west interal circulation aisle. Since this provides access to the west it should be thirty (30) feet wide and not have parking stalls backing out onto it. This can be easily accomplished by moving both the curb-cut and aisle twenty (20) feet to the south. Possible 10 to 15 parking spaces would be lost. This will not affect code compliance since the project is providing 85 additional parking spaces above the City's requirement. Traffic Circulation: Problems with on-site traffic circulation can easily be corrected with the above modifications; however, off-site problems can only be address by a total commitment of all industrial developers in the Valley. The ERC has specifically conditioned the Declaration of Non-Significance on this project to participation in the solution of those area-wide problems. The Public Works Department is preparing an area-wide traffic improvement plan for the Valley. Pedestrian Circulation: The site plan lacks a separate on-site pedestrian circulation system. Some walkways are provided, but they do not provide a connection to the public sidewalk system along both S.W. 39th Street and Lind Avenue S.W. In fact the site plan does not clearly show those adjacent off-site improvements. A potential conflict of automobile traffic and pedestrian exists when it does not have to occur. Usable Public Open Space: The applicant has provided an outdoor eating/sitting area adjacent to the proposed cafeteria. Very little-other public open space is provide. On-Site Recreation: In the review of site plans in the Valley, the staff in the past has not focused on the intent of the Recreational Element of the Valley Comprehensive Plan. With the rapid growth of industrial and office development in the Valley a significant recreational need will appear. The following policies are applicable: 1. Provision of recreational opportunities should be an integral part of the development of the Valley. 2. Recreational opportunities in the Valley that serve both the employees and the community should be encouraged. 3. Firms with large numbers of employees should develop outdoor recreation facilities. 4. Wherever feasible, greenbelt/openspace/wildlife habitats PRELIMINARY REPORT - THE HEARING EXAMINER • ORILLIA PROPERTY ASS;_,..1ATES, LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, FLLE NO. SA-100-85 JANUARY 28, 1986 PAGE 6 should be managed to include recreational opportunities as a secondary objective. 5. The rights-of-way for flood control and drainage features should be designed to permit future recreational use. 6. A pedestrial/bicycle path system separate from the street system and a system of bicycle routes should be incorporated in the developmental plan for the Valley and should connect with other trails or recreational destinations. 7. An active park site should be acquired in the Valley and developed as recreational needs warrant. 8. Acquisition and development of the Interurban Trail from S.W. 43rd Street to Fort Dent Park should be pursued in conjunction with King County and other local jurdictions. The first three policies are directly applicable to any manufacturing or office park development in the Valley. This facility of 178.605 sq. ft. will probably employ 1,100 to 1,300 people. This creates an enormous daytime need for both passive and active recreation in the Valley. 5. In conclusion, the proposal appear to met the public interest by implimenting the Comprehensive Planning and Zoning Code. Some minor revisions to the site plan are warranted to improve both pedestrian and traffic circulation, manuevering in the parking lot, and on-site open space and recreational areas. H. DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATION: Based upon the above analysis, it is recommended that the Hearing Examiner approve the site plan request, File Number SA-100-85, by.Orillia Property Associates, Limited Partnership subject to the following conditions: 1. Relocated the center curb-cut and access aisle 20 feet to the south accross the entire site with limited right-in/right-out access onto Lind Ave. S.W. 2. The other access shown onto Lind Ave. S.W. shall be limited to emergency access only and shall be chained, gated or fenced according to according to Fire Department Approval. 3. Redesign the site plan to include a separate pedestrian circulation system that link the subject site with the sidewalks along S.W. 39th Street and Lind Ave..S.W. and the adjacent development site to the west. I WI I L-1 b R DoNATIL,N NO .�� I I _ ��Ti J I 1 II M—P I, I ~N _1 -1 _ _ - ---..-._ . J ,__ \ ...—. ... <I I ' • I I1 11 ,o , -1 , 1 . . 1 s N Zvt sr I Is III . 1 — 11 ' ' 7 6 O9 1 , II , 11 _ I , f M lOn. f -- w LIST fT ` — II I . I 1 /. I I I 1 ` 4 -- • I I CT I ; I 1 , I I ' ulIl I ` _ I _ ii- /7S• W. 34TH IM_P ,J Ijl.t,/ . t_x:,, ,.. {: I • i S W II 4/ST % [ �j - 1 6 1 )(I I\VAIL E HOSPITA E NE a. . M—P 8 s ii ill ORILLIA PROPERTY ASSOCIATES, LIMITED PARTNERSHIP • SA-100-85. • • APPLICANT URILLIA.PROPERTY ASSOCIATES TOTAL AREA - 11.74 ACRES PRINCIPAL ACCESS LIND AVENUE S.W. - EXISTING ZONING M-P, MANUFACTURING PARK EXISTING USE UNDEVELOPED PROPERTY PROPOSED USE CONSTRUCTION OF THREE, TWO-STORY OFFICE BUILDINGS (120,000 SQ. FT. ) COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN MANUFACTURING PARK/MULTIPLE OPTION . COMMENTS t►'■h�., o "., o"o'eo° • • ';>:.:•<,..:'•'e .r' • '.•••I... • '• •al■7.1,••. ..,o, __ • ••I;oo°o°o°o°o • •• •• `=r`�iw,.• • • •►N • • i: ik ir 0a000000000, o•o•° 1•I•I0 JIB ..• • • • ,•1t1 1,,, • __.1 es 0000a000000c .,r '0000- , -�w� ••• ii ••V� • ODOlC•�0°O°O'3J, �. J Illy Q 04 .-,.% .. pp n,o,clpoo°ro�•'Y.7 .• �• i M... �� S• ••' r•, °°°°°°o°a•'e oc let'.,•"0•! ;�— IF o'o\ f •` Am •0000°00000a0000°o o e1 `�,. v _.0000000.. ; C ! ;.'�ii '°°o°o°o°o°o°o°o°o°� °o 1�� �n4� ••� r.a-. -441111111W r•C� �a0p•0,0�r�l.. Q= n 1•u t All'..I, 1.'1 . ..,,,`E;. `::::::;B:i:;::::411114411411T-, ►`'Q.r � ` ' •si {�<, �✓�d j:::::j: 1tt2_ �� I`� :�...NL.:: �1!`• r�C/ l '•.�'.!.''f"' < A� • \'.gal"I ■•1::111 i°iia4o tom.` t'' '''' .::i:i::*i:::M:•:::K:i::::::::::::-:-:-.:.-.. ' 'ci:i •,",,'-,c3 ii ., ill 111 i 1 •• •nin'• . •07Dun11•�•_ ..0 • s. • �- ,t :•C{,:ii."' r•",%..;7:,.`,V�' •-1■un•■ucKt•}(�••n n■••:u l r \VP i ! ? _' ' :;': ,-.-yl• .� — 1:•,,, . • _►•�■■■■■, --.■ )(>•■II •■..u•■� ,'1 ti`�:�r.;. •�., •- a ��' • .�n1 ,°-'X: • _. . � I`. • ��\� 1• ♦-':• +1.,•� 'r:~'. _may-_N� _ - ••{:? ::-: ; \ 1•1 � k\c :a ,•. I I' \\ '' �? - -_-_ - ".' ►, ,\<•\3Fv, 1� I . `.I //11••11•,, fJIiQ_- --__----_ _. 1 ° ° IIIi1R51��`• ` i';`.-.C:4::1:--1': . _jrCtr. 1 _-__- O°OOOOOO�e ___- _• 1 , 1 „ •■■.' fay �'•}� -_ _- •0000000 __-__ _1 _ ___ ■••�■•1 1�•°•°,.� •••■ ` r (� •' Q 0000000000 _ _ •�•••• I I '14s t1 fL+ t• ♦• _ 0000000000. ----- _ >y' ■■■OMB .- ■•■.=.■i■� ` '. �-J i #Y . .{• f7f _ _000000000000 ___ - j . r •o000000000000• _ If �'-' c 1-,. 00000000000000• . ____ 1 i •� C. t,000000000000000 - __- !••1p� I 1 C' •00000000000000 -rt t► - _ cmP7 • """"'"•""'' . `.-�• ^•` • •0000000000000•., _ -L { - �:?:i•:•:.;{i(•:v};.}}:•'-' k. : • ••°000000. .•. _ 1 �•����■-.- r • 00000. • • • • r +etll ':`:i:i::''< ' E • .• % .. . . . . ./..,....._. ... _ ,...... ..:___;„.,...,,..:-...\\,,,,,K2,„„ E'N, ‘-....S.". ''l "I.- '' Iiii,.40.0;,17, . . • i Qff , ......„ . , , ;s le::..:41,111 I it.11..-_::_z__:::_=_________ ___________ ,-,... • Y/NNN : I '• •• • 111■ It` _ - •000 --- 1•- 000 Nmssl •. III■ 1 •f _ - --— •000- :y•, 000• i r ■ 1 • • • me Il ,. _ =_ rril I' I 1■■■■f J• MO 'r -_ -___ _--__ 9 ' • • .._ .I !I UMW ,' ,III■1 U gees I u- ---- ------ S .1;;.•Lr ,, N.uifm. 1u■m�ro••ir ali... ---- • -000000 '• ;\ I I c+'III➢ ..0•1 f••,,. b Ci i�il•11lb� ,.�,r 0000 • : 000 D.^:C .■ Yu, 111 .rUl _ _ - - - 0000• °oo°oJ 1 • i•■•l ail --.III ,•1• - - _—_- •r•c •0000.Di `9cJ:�7 ' • . amuse•■ •111 __ _ • ___-___ •_�:. 00000 •� 0.0t^.-- l ''�7 •••■I 1•II :J,.,• MT- s__ ■■■t ,'•' ---- •�. 000• c^o__^i .,,.. iv 3. r. . • t,, t---1 .Ctlif • • • •• • =-r= I -------_.4 •rG: !v__ r r __- � ,,-- 1:C_ ___ 3'ry I .••■•tee g_-'-_- ,4, i • ---- - --- -- - 1.►A -------- J -- — �■uu •0000• 111 iN �1.y�-�_..:... w.ou.1.m01: •� 111{{11 _--- .�us,l■■Ir .00000000• �.. ,—,. esDVIW�r 1 I •` - •00000000• fj{.,, • • •Oo O 00000° ' • . f r ��(• =-YA-1 _- 1•I o0000000• r'.� ►• Pie'," =7DCZ o000000• !4 /1'•' _ -- ;if 000000••�✓ �'•;• I' • (to - - 't C• -__.____ 'I•�11 •00000•. TT '7 ..SJ �,+ 00000 iV { ^— _ 1�\i _ i 0000° 0000°• 1�!; ::;: 0000 000000 :. � 00000•00000 .•;,, -;•'•-� N. 0000- F( -„ 1000 {{: J1�� LAND USE ELEMENT : :, { Single Family Commercial 1 (7 , • Low Densityrill-::n1 \\ Office / Office Park I. L 1 Medium Density00000.0, .0000°°° Public/Quasi-Public 0000°°°. Multi-Family •00000°• ° ° Aagiiiii High Density ° ° ° ° ° °�` Light Industrial °°°°°°°° °°°'°°°� Multi-Family °°°°°°°°°°°°°° °o°o°o°o°o°o°ol • G , �°o°o°o°0°0°0°o I '- C4 Recreation ... . 'Heavy Industrial col . i9 °°° 0000° Greenbelt I '• 'f;y'�c: _-== Manufacturing Park , / Multiple Option ( • • EVERGREEN TREE SWING DETAL TREE E STAKING DETAIL' y • i 8 e • dri • r. 14.1,.....„ V._,,, • 05) ' ... :1:-'1'1 ¶1i1:i` I V wCCO.rCg-- PAV /YiC nK/ Y IJ CO CO _ CO CO eillo CO SHRUB PLANTING DETAIL 9 elp + . \ 1 I` 1 j () O ""•';ter rl —a' �Z�, s -� _ -J,0-.^%09 '�• ,19- .. �"77 7':• `s,<E rc�.,r s�.i Q t7 0 d� '�,+: sae a.:vr ewe t1 cn. < • ? 41I V� GENERAL NOTES CO . -_,-. e 1. .C.CR�.a.Cw •.C. , ee•ar,•Cae,..e �• �,S • rw.'.H-�=K:A�'.�./.•.V naa_r 9-/ti:.+.G Z r.. • I I • ,t .n;,1.9 •-• _ ' r n_ :ni ,4.1ni_ • C=.Y'•ri-:7.v^+,•+•<lr:.- t. • ,111 =s.��-=1,u,59.c.-� ] 0 6"C71(%a=GS..n...•H N 7:,,,,....Cr�'n.ia0 W mai UJ O -- }Ili.// Z i III% • ' a'-') i ,.• :'af••� PLANT LIST _ — °c OW u. • • 0 r, - \i I f.�'I 6 tidrL,<+'..^...a'x//Y�.e.:neG t.}.C.�.p•e G l (y3 •rna /ti/�— �.-G .ta .-,sic se�T','+•CJ,-.nr c• ,-a.O.O f<dj • St i • ( . 6 S ' tivwJ3 G..V W, vi, .-, Z-at'.%K 1 tr:i? ��.yy[S el_ I . .X.�ni1.7 .'GL?VO 6b'O!G • •I�at� CI ' p I ,Y.^,K>.^iw .+Gv95:YKVu'i G.O.0.:G.'x4 C`r+n/.e!G % w -, a -wve,cmG.ry9,•.=a+,..n..fcwr.4•-a•uc e e . `• `..• 1h•.I..vd'L'.LriYM jn0.6 'iY 5 91c 3Y,..W C(l+. ,.+Y ' d"W.1.47JS,.n/T.,,' '•.'.'cM-nr a./A,,..CCO • . _ Cb a:.a-[�1YIe.00N K'lLrw,..'ra-u. 4 Ni• I.,A:/A9 OA:.:A9 •:� i •7: ,.. ,Af M7:.:.0:•'� �' I�7••,.oc'12,n o wv...Ci.61 S,'b' C(•w ' • y!y COD R•.1v011/.S,.✓.4i.LYP,6.^.I'HN. i 0.._-_ b es ' /'}� ( b n„vs vu-rvlvi.•r..w•o n.0 vac. III® �_J " / 1 `1J I t .-1G•'cG.7.o-U..v3wXG/JNw'dB 9`H \�f/'f X�+u...vrrMs.1..z+,w.2 ncr.010 et•,savGe reay.. 1 .-G.YJ•1..e,,.91a/M!J7_/G/Yr 0-.910 1,•OL. dL •'7 _ -- •3 ••-1 _ 1 ( •.:llA 81A2 J4..'(M,.O ,.i1G 9�-OL- 10• i I • • l--�L SCGbTO!vYv I. <� '. (J' �:'.V.1 Cs•.xH. '.+v1.�,1 I.s.L 9,',•/N .1t).: ,. • ,., fir► �a e�srer SITE EN PLAN- .�- - , ®en..: =ao norlll L- I . e I i...,.,„...,.:-: , , • _ - -,.:-...-;. ..;, i j : i • __ __ _. ..-1 .• C l ... ) ( ) (— • . ._...: . ...... ... \.--- •—I . .. • . ,-----------) -7!:!. .__ ---- , 2. ______ -•- -- i 1 t.' • -.,----- • .---, . tx- • rx-,w..„ _••••[7] ,....: __._..• _:...,... _.-.: .L . :"...i K _1 _ ._ _ --I • ....,,,./,‘, •._._. .. _ . • _7_1- 1 , -7 ..„4,.., ,,..., ,(.7. at,,-,F.,,,,_Tr;; 5,5•,...=.1..- •.•'•••AT...T."—, ".•---.t.--e "..• .1 -...'• . '"•:,:•--- •'''' •--.1.... . • . • • • • 1 i _._ ._ .,.., , . . , ( „. , • ,, ( .l , . ) ( _) ,,• ( ) y , I— • . . r;73 ( ...i ) (---- \ . -- •, _.. . .. :, '• ,...„% ' . . ..:. IL:H.: r— . . .2_i I _ . ... ). z 0-- - ------ — Z 1- ...__ .. .. . . , w < 1. 0.. i i 'F. -- - — 2 2 ; : ,_ ; - ta .C.) ._. ,—7, C—' L7[ 7--) l'" N/ ...J.'', 1 12:fr.' \ •;-. i r (----) -r-----)". "' .F > r C., .-- ._ - f, • ___ . (..) L I-- r !...__ .1 ...•...,• 'I 111 ..J ., ..j •••••• Ts Ill.• . 1 1 • ( " __D 1 i .77,1 . ) . ; . . 0 .F.L.P. _ '''s ...r;'•... & ...r. r'.•• ....-.%........ .6".. .".,...,A ,•-• F. 0 no-- ,, --•,......... ,7- • . . 1) • __, i 1- .- - ILK i . ,5 ., - 4.:.•K : i I • •• ._ .'._.._....., g 1g . e • •- . . . _Jo:. • .:-C-- i 1...11.0....•10 Li . . II,! --. .[ r-1- _-__ : -!--i, i ! k ) . _ —.—.b. -- - -,-- --- .0 --. _ _ ... . _ . ___ 4.......Y.,.(W.) 1 . •, i '‘I.I.1.!...1'°—) . ( v..- / 1.‘ • — , ; r...0-•, -• . .01, <-••••11.,.ff....1,.......,••• i g NI . -.1 iNi I,,......,......,0/.....1....... • ............a.,•1.2 e......Ver...• .......,.......a ...0...ter........ ro.......61 .•,....le....ca. ,.....•...no. ....• ...Oa..r.../.00.7. •-•.". .P.: •••.1'.... • V 4.-..-,r...z.,.:',..,.•-„.•"&Yaffe.) ....,...P.a.,.•.lady.5 4../..'PVT*. la iff[ffmra.ago.-1..... e........r1........--. .....GL...•.1...•" • 14 •• 1 '11---"-..• . % .',.1.11', .• -..-.•,-.4-,,,-,--.--..,,:r-.-„:..,,-,_....,,,_...../.' •,. .. ...,..•.5 OSC•• ji „....,.j...,........,,...01,.....-..,,,.,,.......2.1..............••••1 c.........) 5..... 5.•1.1 .-ra.,Err I. •. . ____,... __ _ . al • 1 • r). • • •• . • - r ..1 • i _ _ �z ! L D II — I • . �O :• fj i/ ••V\ lil 7. I og .. • _, — 1.1. r fa 1 • . i • VI .fIl -UI — _ f- ..I �711-1� • • • • -1112-11• • •I , ; s001•o0 1 F.al,POSE I' F aGILIT( 1 Officeandw•mAa�men le,. .— .— vlMoo Avenue .Saute 103 Seattle WatAtestne en‘a rEco Tekgbr W>.28I.sm c E..To— ..✓iI tI Ib 35 — -- KtV1tWlivu uC.r/1nuiIL-" " .. w .�-..'• • NI APPROVED PROVED WITH CONDITIONS 0 NOT APPROVED b.. r r ,a ajj �,-- . / /-0/iZ DATE: - �, SIGNAT RE. OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE (e'' / / REVISION 5/1982 c/ /j Form 182 REVI,EWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : ® APPROVED ® APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS 0 NOT APPROVED S `; )!//) _. ,2/ -t i ,'j1 7C f//�i=- <'-e S S. 7--e),*C-Q/)t.c.,,Lh/ 8 ')< i� /L_L-. -) (2,,c7.'.) / / 'C C / )/<-: /."'y .� ' /- O /.,` 0-/ . r> ._'.y ,.�;,i,(•, ,%l/ ; r"7tG yyiti44.7V //- .. . „-. ,,) f O/J//c:r ,.4Y ..1�)0 Cif;7, /l 'pir/J'ti%_S ` A- _)/iv / :% .•. �� / e� :,),_... //� Av/.//�� e �� I ��/,1;. .%//� DATE: //" / / ) I SIGNATURE OP DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRES NTATIVE ,. ,_ r J_ I, / >t- -G l_� A-,r,.-v✓L84'(/'�9 ( REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : �4 (-lcf k) PC OPYY1�7lT' APPROVED 0 APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS 0 NOT APPROVED PO — "C- 14.,11,4rj 4 • , , ! f 0; 1 /e,1,116C4S1J2 .. thX10.4.-- GtA-e CA)(4,2 M 0-s I,I,.1 ..,.cA, c,1 /0),4_ / '' ' - t4C2 j---1:1761-'112-j 4-'41AI -------le4-e G 4,4-a 0 a/Le 6{44r.,AJOX (.i/ ao ' at" LO 6,1.) - ' -J 4---vis e4 - ' ' ! a_,I,( 40 /1&41- e V. . C<'-\ -- Lig1142 ' . Irslit,s-\ e 1/I.e r-7//42...121,11e. . 1117ICQ6'- 7t• • . 06e:AE . 5' /4/ ', ' ',lee- -#1114A44.62ey\ , deiKuLi /,‘,,,..-6-1 DATE: 3� / 3/ SIGNATURE OF DIRECTO �R OR AUTHO LED REPRESENTATIVE REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION-;[ 1- ; APPROVED ❑ �, ?ROVED. WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED DATE : /( �� SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : 0T/4/Ty NE605 AA"I' um-si i PLI/J5 APPROVED n APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS ® NOT APPROVED UTILITY APPROVAL SUBJECT TO I �.DT 2 �� LATE COMERS A6REEk;E4S� 5A! SAID P� �✓� LATE COMERS MEEK' /(/D SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT L, WATER y �s se '/C a.0 / /770, DOOSQ•fr = r- &. FenD SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT c....� SEWER �/rES i 1J D401, /x /7D, ODD SQ•FT- �i gOD SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AREA WATER A/i /3 60D0. 0D SPECIAL ASSESSMENT ARC°:C!VIRGE-SEWER APPROVED WATER PLAN V.k-S L,AY out OK APPROVED SEWER PLAN YE; ei APPROVED FIRE NlDRART LOCATIONS NY FIRE DEPT. YES; • I%1 FIRE Fin ANALYSIS ! DATE: SIGNATURE OF DI ECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : T `J -ICI -T(LA APPROVED � APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS Ei NOT APPROVED Qa �UI`.t _ DATE: 10/48c REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION ; 0 APPROVED G HPPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED ) d e,-74 1/ 9 r-4 r caI ref I►n ' q p a c.� (4, iT 0/4/724 l✓Yr en.A »-tG. f _ • • • DATE: //- z a -?^5 SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 i Form 182 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : / ; J i ./ • c ,< APPROVED In APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS T APPROVED 1 . Driveway entrances to be 30 feet in width. 2. Provide off-site improvement plans showing locations of existing street lights, in relation to proposed driveway locations. 3. Developer to promote ride-sharing and transit usage as condition of development. 4. Left-turn channelization required for Lind Ave. at SW 39th Street and any roadway widening to accommodate the channelization as part of the off-site improvement. 5. Signalization of Lind Ave. SW and SW 41st Street required as part of the overall development on SW 39th Street. 6. Provide two-way centerlane left-turn channelization on Lind Ave. SW opposite the two driveway entrances off Lind Ave. SW. Include all necessary roadway ,'.. widel`in•gy ��._ r'��- DATE: // - SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR 4R AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE * -dria-t4durt REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 7. Provide traffic engineering analysis for traffic signal warrant at ' the intersection of Lind Ave. SW & SW 39th Street. Traffic signal will be required if warrants are met or near being met. 1004N - - CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST NO.: ECF-119-85 APPLICATION NO(s).: SA-100-85 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Application for site plan approval to allow the construction of three, two-story office buildings totaling 178,605 square feet on an 11.74 acre site. PROPONENT: Orillia Property Associates, Limited Partnership LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Located at the northwest corner of Lind Avenue S.W. and S.W. 39th Street. LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton, Building and Zoning Department. The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. Additional conditions were imposed as mitigating measures by the Environmental Review Committee under their authority of Section 4-2822(D) Renton Municipal Code. Responsible Official: Environmental Review Committee City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South. Renton. WA 98055 Phone: 235-2550 APPEAL: You may appeal this determination in writing to Renton Hearing Examiner no later than January 27, 1986.. You should be prepared to make specific factual objections. Contact City of Renton, Building and Zoning Department to read or ask about the procedures for SEPA appeals. DATE OF DECISION: January 6, 1986 PUBLICATION DATE: January 13. 1986 DAP Rona d G. Nelson LWry M. 721.ger Building and Zoning Director Policy Dev= •a ment 1 ector _e Richard C. ghton Public Works Director PLAN REVIEW ROUTING SLIP DATE: - / 3 APPLICANT: (D L.) P o Pc�7-i _� °�— �-� G / /?• '4I K • JOB ADDRESS: .l_) cz Q 174 `- L l OD NATURE OF WORK: `—PNO e/ t) G C) /2F/c GS TO: 1 Comments Due Comments Due • I N'I ENGINEERING DIVISION / - -�;L' ) I I FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU I V( I TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION /- - . 7 I I BUILDING CODE REVIEW I I UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION I I ZONING & PARKING I I OTHERS I I ENERGY CODE Comments or suggestions regarding this application should be provided in writing. Please provide comments to the Building Division by 5:00 p.m. on above date. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION • I I APPROVED I I APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS /' NOT APPROVED l Pc-C6 •.1��n / T P//t-J a‹ch l'E✓ri" '7 Co"7n7F.,.tT�� ,1� c'e-4 � yam•• Z {� MI T 7 Teti i f (` j-:��;/rQ•a•lf '(r1Y►pt .111?1/ /4t/f.1•t.. 3 L LrJ SCv d— 3 w 3 9 Sr Sc�„�/ . pram's-4-(A? U/a.cl 11 r 1,,E zap idZe • (a/6 DATE /- ? — 96. • Signature of Director or Authorized Representative REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION Traffic Engineering I ( APPROVED I__I APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS I:An NOT APPROVED 1. Driveway entrances to be 30 feet in width. 2. Provide off-site improvement plans showing locations of existing street lights in relation to proposed driveway locations. 3. Developer to promote ridesharing and transit usage as condition of development. 4. Left=turn channelization required for Lind Ave. at SW 39th Street and any roadway widening to accommodate the channelization as part of the off-site improvement. 5. Signalization of Lind Ave. SW and SW 41st Street required as part of the overall development on SW 39th Street. 6. Provide two-way centerlane left-turn channelization on Lind Ave. SW opposite the two driveway entrances off Lind Ave. SW. Include all necessary roadway widening. 7. Provide traffic engineering analysis for traffic signal warrant at the intersection of Lind Ave. SW & SW 39th Street. Traffic signal wil be required if warrants are met or near being met. / p _ D• i4)01(e. 7, s �o be. Jcco,.ato/�Stie�r i�e{er c/� -v 'c1;o41 , DATE ice..,. 2 /SuNk Signature of Director or Authorized'Representative hfl r+62., _Vf drier-17 oh Ltti-cl e Se ) Na 47,or./J eld0 I0 L na.c..+ a-vi a(y 5 ( S '']-e L l s-e-) d, -P f-"90 /83 d ✓e ' 4 L, / ti Ste , OF R4,. ( _ ° BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT z sok , RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR ammo O MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE.SO. RENTON.WASH. 88055 • 235-2540 9,0 cp. 04q fD SE PI '1.53 BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR MEMORANDUM DATE: January 13, 1986 TO: Fred J. Kaufman, Hearing Examiner FROM: Environmental Review Committee SUBJECT: Orillia Property Associates, Limited Partnership FILE NUMBER: SA-100-85 ECF-119-85 LOCATED ON: the northwest corner of Lind Ave. S.W. and S.W. 39th Street. • The Environmental Review Committee (ERC), under their substantive authority [Section 4-2822(D)] recommends to the decision maker, the Hearing Examiner, that the application for site plan approval to allow the construction of three buildings totaling 178.605 square feet of office space on 11.74 acres located at the northwest corner of Lind Avenue S.W. and S.W. 39th Street is subject to the following conditions: 1. Installation of intersection improvements at Lind Ave. S.W. and.S.W. 39th Street including a traffic signal and lane widening per Public Works Department approval. 2. The Public Works Department shall submit to the ERC by January 27, 1986, an area-wide traffic and circulation study bounded by South 180th on the south, SR-167 on the east, SR-181 on the west, and I-405 on the north, along with the extension of Oakesdale Avenue S.W. to SR-900. The study shall identify (1) a circulation system adequate to accommodate motor vehicle traffic locally generated in the study area at build-out office park Intensity, (2) the total estimated cost of that system: (3) the total trip generation associated with said office park development. (4) an estimate of the per trip cost of constructing the system, (5) a list of those elements of the system which have already been constructed or committed to by pending developers and who receives credit (on a trip basis) for the cost of that construction; and (6) a prioritization of the construction projects needed in the immediate future to minimize the impact of developments currently being proposed in the study area. F red J. Kaufman. Hearing .aminer • Ro: •Orillia Property Ass ites.. Limited Partnership File Number: SA-1L. 35/ECF-119-85 - January 13. 1986 Page 2 3. Participation_ in area-wide traffic Improvements identified by the above • traffic study to the project's proportionate share based upon estimated daily traffic generation as calculated by standards established in the Institute of Traffic Engineers Trip Generation Manual. The ultimate costs per vehicle trip shall not exceed $175 per trip. (Estimated 2,144 vehicle trips). 4. Credit for adjacent signalization at S.W. 39th Street and Lind Avenue S.W. will be credited against the project's projected proportionate impact and for other scheduled area-wide improvements if the applicant proceeds to complete instead of the City constructing those improvements. The Environmental Review Committee finds that the following facts are, true of the1 proposed project: • 1. The addition of 2.144 vehicle trips to the anticipated 1.840 vehicle trips associated with Phase II construction and a 980-space parking lot that provides 70% of the parking for the adjacent 266.000 square feet of office to the south'is significant and requires mitigation. The project represents approximately 35% of all anticipated traffic on S.W. 39th Street. 2. The City of Renton must identify area-wide traffic circulation and improvement needs to provide continued public accessibility to individual privately owned properties. Without this formal identification by the City, the general level of service will continue to decline as a result of incremental adverse impacts resulting from private development. 3. The previous traffic evaluation conducted late in 1984 was`based on a land use assumption of a much greater percentage of warehouse use and a lower Intensity of office park uses. Actual and proposed development is office park in nature and this use generates significantly more traffic in addition to the general shift in type of vehicle trips. As a result a revised traffic study is necessary to reflect changing circumstances. 4. The total anticipated development by Boeing Electronics Company, Boeing Computer Services., and Boeing Commercial Airplane Company within the general traffic study area represents a known impact of 1.1 million square feet of office space and possibly 6,500 employees. This represents a doubling of 1984 employment in the study area. Therefore, the Boeing Corporation is a major contributor to present impacts and the ultimate impacts of full industrial development of the study area. The Boeing Corporation must therefore be a significant contributor to the ' solution. Therefore, the above conditions are necessary as a minimum for the preservation of the welfare and safety of the general public and a minimum to mitigate the advers environmental impacts of the proposal. 1 Fred J. Kaufman, Hearing( aminer ( . Re: Orillia Property Asso es„ Limited Partnership ' File Number: SA-100-ds/ECF-119-85 January 13, 1986 Page 3 • Under Section 4-2822(D), the decision maker must accept these conditions as binding upon his ultimate decision unless he identifies in writing a substantial error in fact or conclusion by the Environmental Review Committee. The decision maker then has the option of asking the ERC for reconsideration or revising the conditions. The applicant also has the ability to request reconsideration of these conditions from the ERC or appeal these conditions directly to the Hearing Examiner under authority granted in Section 4-2823(A)(1)(a) within 14 days of the date that the DNS is final. Therefore„the appeal date would be Monday. January 27. 1986, at 5 p.m. Appeals must be submitted in the form prescribed by both the Environmental Ordinance of the City of Renton and the Hearing Examiner Ordinance. Section 4-3011(B). RJB:wr:ss 1009N cc: (1) Edward Heavey Orillia Property Associates, L.P. c/o OhW Properties, Inc. 201 Elliott Avenue West Seattle, Washington 98119 (2) Robert Morgan, Corporate Manager Real Property Division Boeing Company P.O. Box 3707 Mail Stop 13-03 Seattle. Washington 98124 OF RA,A tVeot- ° BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR 0 - co� MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 • 235-2540 • 09�rED SEP�Gts0 BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR January 20, 1986 Edward Heavey 0 & W Properties, Inc. 201 Elliott Avenue West Seattle, Washington 98119 RE: ORILLIA PROPERTY ASSOCIATES, LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, FILE NUMBER SA-100-85 Dear Mr. Heavey: The City of Renton Building and Zoning Department formally accepted the above mentioned application on November 19, 1985. A public hearing before the City of Renton Land Use Hearing Examiner has been scheduled for January 28, 1986. The public hearing commences at 9:00 a.m. in the Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall. The applicant or representative(s) of the applicant is required to be present at the public hearing. A copy of the staff report will be mailed to you before the hearing. If you have any questions, please call the Building and Zoning Department at 235-2550. Sincerely, e-0 cam . cam. c Roger J. Blaylock Zoning Administrator RJB:JMM:ss 2180Z.1 • %$ ° BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT „{L RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR z 09 Co" MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH.98055 • 235-2540 0,9gT�O SEP1„0- BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYORRECEIVE * MEMORANDUM 1 JAN 4 1986 CITY OF RENTON HEARING EXAMINER DATE: January 13, 1986 TO: Fred J. Kaufman, Hearing Examiner FROM: Environmental Review Committee SUBJECT: Orillia Property Associates, Limited Partnership FILE NUMBER: SA-100-85 ECF-119-85 LOCATED ON: the northwest corner of Lind Ave. S.W. and S.W. 39th Street. The Environmental Review Committee (ERC), under their substantive authority [Section 4-2822(D)] recommends to the decision maker, the Hearing Examiner, that the application for site plan approval to allow the construction of three buildings totaling 178,605 square feet of office space on 11.74 acres located at the northwest corner of Lind Avenue S.W. and S.W. 39th Street is subject to the following conditions: 1. Installation of intersection improvements at Lind Ave. S.W. and S.W. 39th Street including a traffic signal and lane widening per Public Works Department approval. 2. The Public Works Department shall submit to the ERC by January 27, 1986, an area-wide traffic and circulation study bounded by South 180th on the south, SR-167 on the east, SR-181 on the west, and I-405 on the north, along with the extension of Oakesdale Avenue S.W. to SR-900. The study shall identify (1) a circulation system adequate to accommodate motor vehicle traffic locally generated in the study area at build-out office park intensity, (2) the total estimated cost of that system; (3) the total trip generation associated with said office park development, (4) an estimate of the per trip cost of constructing the system, (5) a list of those elements of the system which have already been constructed or committed to by pending developers and who receives credit (on a trip basis) for the cost of that construction; and (6) a prioritization of the construction projects needed in the immediate future to minimize the impact of developments currently being proposed in the study area. J Fred J. Kaufman, Hearing L.__ininer Re: Orillia Property Associates„ Limited Partnership File Number: SA-100-85/ECF-119-85 January 13, 1986 Page 2 3. Participation in area-wide traffic improvements identified by the above traffic study to the project's proportionate share based upon estimated daily traffic . generation as calculated by standards established in the Institute of Traffic Engineers Trip Generation Manual. The ultimate costs per vehicle trip shall not exceed $175 per trip. (Estimated 2,144 vehicle trips). 4. Credit for adjacent signalization at. S.W. 39th Street and Lind Avenue S.W. will be credited against the project's projected proportionate impact and for other scheduled area-wide improvements if the applicant proceeds to complete instead of the City constructing those improvements. The Environmental Review Committee finds that the following facts are true of the proposed project: 1. The addition of 2,144 vehicle trips to the anticipated 1,840 vehicle trips associated with Phase II construction and a 980-space parking lot that provides 70% of the parking for the adjacent 266,000 square feet of office • to the south is significant and requires mitigation. The project represents approximately 35% of all anticipated traffic on S.W. 39th Street. 2. The City of Renton must identify area-wide traffic circulation and improvement needs to provide continued public accessibility to individual privately owned properties. Without this formal identification by the City, the general level of service will continue to decline as a result of incremental adverse impacts resulting from private development. • 3. The previous traffic evaluation conducted late in 1984 was based on a land use assumption of a much greater percentage of warehouse use and a lower intensity of office park uses. Actual and proposed development is office park in nature and this use generates significantly more traffic in addition to the general shift in type of vehicle trips. As a result a revised traffic study is necessary to reflect changing circumstances. 4. The total anticipated development by Boeing Electronics Company. Boeing Computer Services, and Boeing Commercial Airplane Company within the general traffic study area represents a known impact of 1.1 million square feet of office space and possibly 6,500 employees. This represents a doubling of 1984 employment in the study area. Therefore, the Boeing Corporation is a major contributor to present impacts and the ultimate impacts of full industrial development of the study area. The Boeing Corporation must therefore be a significant contributor to the solution. Therefore, the above conditions are necessary as a minimum for the preservation of the welfare and safety of the general public and a minimum to mitigate the adverse environmental impacts of the proposal. ^ Ffed J. Kaufman, Hearing ,niner Re: Orillia Property Associates„ Limited Partnership File Number: SA-100-85/ECF-119-85 January 13, 1986 Page 3 Under Section 4-2822(D), the decision maker must accept these conditions as binding upon his ultimate decision unless he identifies in writing a substantial error in fact or conclusion by the Environmental Review Committee. The decision maker then has the option of asking the ERC for reconsideration or revising the conditions. The applicant also has the ability to request reconsideration of these conditions from the ERC or appeal these conditions directly to the Hearing Examiner under authority granted in Section 4-2823(A)(1)(a) within 14 days of the date that the DNS is final. Therefore, the appeal date would be Monday, January 27, 1986, at 5 p.m. Appeals must be submitted in the form prescribed by both the Environmental Ordinance of the City of Renton and the Hearing Examiner Ordinance, Section 4-3011(B). RJB:wr:ss 1009N cc: (1) Edward Heavey Orillia Property Associates, L.P. c/o O&W Properties, Inc. 201 Elliott Avenue West Seattle, Washington 98119 (2) Robert Morgan, Corporate Manager Real Property Division Boeing Company P.O. Box 3707 Mail Stop 13-03 Seattle, Washington 98124 RENT(M BUILDING & ZONING DEPA,71MENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 119 - 85 APPLICATION NO(S) : SITE APPROVAL 100-85 PROPONENT: ORILLIA PROPERTY ASSOC/ 0 & W PROPERTIES PROJECT TITLE : BOEING ELECTRONICS COMPANY BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION TO. CONSTRUCT THREE-TWO STORY OFFICE BUILDINGS TOTALING 120,000 FEET LOCATION : NORTH WEST CORNER OF SW 39th STREET AND LIND AV SW TO : PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 0 ENGINEERING DIVISION El TRAFFIC ENG . DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : i :i UTILITIES ENG . DIVISION El FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING . PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P .M. ON REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: FB4-171) 6 JAPPROVED LI APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS 0 NOT APPROVED //14) ATE.D - r- _. SIGNAT OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE l - �-gam REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 RENTI ' BUILDING & ZONING DEPA MENT r • DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 119 - 85 APPLICATION NO(S) : SITE APPROVAL 100-85 PROPONENT: ORILLIA PROPERTY ASSOC/ 0 & W PROPERTIES PROJECT TITLE : BOEING ELECTRONICS COMPANY BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION TO CONSTRUCT THREE-TWO STORY OFFICE BUILDINGS TOTALING 120,000 FEET S ITS ?L-ias�1 LOCATION : NORTH WEST CORNER OF SW 39th STREET AND LIND AV SW TO: 0 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : El ENGINEERING DIVISION ® TRAFFIC ENG . DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : UTILITIES ENG . DIVISION XFIRE PREVENTION BUREAU 0 PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT 0 BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT fl POLICE DEPARTMENT EI POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT OTHERS : COMMENTS OR; SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING . ' PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P.M; ON REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : RO OAPPROVED © APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS EINOT APPROVED /, /Sz /4 oD, o� 0 rJirJ 1110 A cc f-=�S �i�.c WI �„..3J S_ 5�e- f L 2 . �,� T�2 UTr�/7.t 'Z'}G0/4_G ,/ z•,o ao.`Js?/X//c7', Lam//;%)G jeir / F- c2b,) /J/,€� tJ c2 OD G/iz h)eP2/(0TS o.) �SiT—c /VJ /,47 /A) /1/li'g% .. (21 DATE : ~-// SIGNATUR7 0 DIRECT R OR AUTHORIZED REPRES • NTATIVE ` (// 6Y-"g‘ r-pif REVS ION 5/1982 Form 182 RENT`,.BUILDING at ZONING DEPE; MENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET CITY OF RENTON ECF - 119 - 85 NOV 19 1985 APPLICATION NO(S) : SITE APPROVAL 100-85 POI Iry PROPONENT: ORILLIA PROPERTY ASSOC/ 0 & W PROPERTIES nFVELoPMftIT nFPr. PROJECT TITLE : BOEING ELECTRONICS COMPANY BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION TO CONSTRUCT THREE-TWO STORY OFFICE BUILDINGS TOTALING 120,000 FEET LOCATION : NORTH WEST CORNER OF SW 39th STREET AND LIND AV SW TO: Ei PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : DENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG, DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : OUTILITIES ENG , DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU OPARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT LI BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT OPOLICE, DEPARTMENT 51POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT OTHERS : COMMENTS OR! SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING, PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P.M. ON REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : 7 L1.c`f Q C2( D•PY11E -T—' © APPROVED DAPPROVED WITH CONDITIONS ❑ NOT APPROVED ` v'e /it ' ' ' fA-41.4- Gue G444kern„.".,,,et..„1/4/ 444Ao, !‘ „d-J..„;,.06. • A, . z:o ‘e).: 1 t5(e /467P\ ,140-r4NSZA1.1./>').‘ DATE: /c2-f3/ ,ç SIGNATURE OF DIRECTuR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Fnrm 1R2 RENT(' BUILDING & ZONING DEPW�MENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF — 119 — 85 APPLICATION NO(S) : SITE APPROVAL 100-85 PROPONENT: ORILLIA PROPERTY ASSOC/ 0 & W PROPERTIES • PROJECT TITLE ; BOEING ELECTRONICS COMPANY BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION TO CONSTRUCT THREE-TWO STORY OFFICE BUILDINGS TOTALING 120,000 FEET LOCATION : NORTH WEST CORNER OF SW 39th STREET AND LIND AV SW TO : 0 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : . Ei ENGINEERING DIVISION ' El TRAFFIC ENG . DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : El UTILITIES ENG . DIVISION El FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU 0 PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT El BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT XI POLICE DEPARTMENT POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT - El OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING . PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P.M. ON . 1 ��REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVIS;I ON; I APPROVED//tSl 0 APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS ❑ NOT APPROVED I 1 1 c ' � • a. DATE: ( 7q�,�— SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 RENTC7 BUILDING & ZONING DEN 'MEN' } DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 119 - 85 APPLICATION NO(S) : SITE APPROVAL 100-85 PROPONENT : ORILLIA PROPERTY ASSOC/ 0 & W PROPERTIES PROJECT TITLE : BOEING ELECTRONICS COMPANY BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION TO CONSTRUCT THREE-TWO STORY OFFICE BUILDINGS TOTALING 120,000 FEET LOCATION : NORTH WEST CORNER OF SW 39th STREET AND LIND AV SW TO: El PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : El ENGINEERING DIVISION ® TRAFFIC ENG . DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : VI UTILITIES ENG . DIVISION 0 FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU El PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT LI BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT OOTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING . PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P .M. ON REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : (JT//./Ty ' A/ //S/,E',E,e/AG NC 05 APPIioU&t WTiuTy nu^l5 Ei APPROVED n APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS 121 NOT APPROVED IUT1LITY APPROVAL SUBJECT TO I 2.07.2, 0.4 ,3Al _A D ?,e .2W_Z - UTE COMERS AGREEMENT 777,n 1b LATE COMERS ACREEMEE: :d SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT Ir9n.:: .MITER 11 O.0d AT A 1/70, DOOSzP.PT = er(o• g )t• SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT Gr;L. -SEWER S gri•D - a /74 ODD SG,•FT-g 74i g00• .- SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AREA o RCE-WATER R/// /./ 0- • o0 SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AREA MARGE-SEWER A!/' APPROVED WATER PLAN V.gS L,AH our OK APPROVED SEWER PLAN C!!;5 APPROVED FIRE VIBRANT LOCATIONS 5 DY FIRE DEPT. . ,Es ►A ' 0% g FIRE FLOW ANALYSIS n DATE: ��- °Is — g� SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 ti RENT',, - BUILDING & ZONING DEPV—MENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 119 - 85 APPLICATION NO(S) : SITE APPROVAL 100-85 PROPONENT : ORILLIA PROPERTY ASSOC/ 0 & W PROPERTIES PROJECT TITLE : BOEING ELECTRONICS COMPANY BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION TO CONSTRUCT THREE-TWO STORY OFFICE BUILDINGS TOTALING 120,000 FEET LOCATION : NORTH WEST CORNER OF SW 39th STREET AND LIND AV SW 1 I TO : 0 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 0 ENGINEERING DIVISION DTRAFFIC ENG . DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : 0 UTILITIES ENG . DIVISION 0 FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU PiPARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT 0 POLICE DEPARTMENT POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 0 OTHERS : 1 COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. . PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON ' REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : PAWS' © , C'I`CA-110,NI APPROVED DA WITH CONDITIONS ONOT APPROVED c Forict(161 DATE: I0 20 8SIGNATURE OF DI RECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 RENT( BUILDING & ZONING DEPAT MENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF — 119 — 85 APPLICATION NO(S) : SITE APPROVAL 100-85 PROPONENT: ORILLIA PROPERTY ASSOC/ 0 & W PROPERTIES PROJECT TITLE : BOEING ELECTRONICS COMPANY BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION TO CONSTRUCT THREE-TWO STORY OFFICE BUILDINGS TOTALING 120,000 FEET LOCATION : NORTH WEST CORNER OF SW 39th STREET AND LIND AV SW T O: 0 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : Oil ENGINEERING DIVISION El TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: flUTILITIES ENG . DIVISION U FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU ri PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT ® BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT El POLICE DEPARTMENT. 1 POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ® OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDIE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P.M. ON , 11 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : mom' I OAPPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS JJ NOT APPROVED P_ �JJ ff // / d D (1) 5titb t 1'l- d(�'°7` t (� yz fe d` d K.et,��. Y� P Et:t�� C�( ` '�af�"mot ,� V (12—) D 4 a, � I DATE: //® 2 2- —216 SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 OF R4, �; ° BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT z RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR o� cp� MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 • 235-2540 09gT�O SEPS14,e BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR MEMORANDUM • DATE: January. 2, 1986 TO: ERC Reviewers FROM: Roger Blaylock RE: Site Approval .100-85 Orillia• Property/0 &W Properties • Please review the revised site plan: • 'Note the shifting of the buildings from Lind Av orientation to 39th. • The square footage is 178 , 600. . Please return by January 6, 1986. Thank you , TRAFFIC ENG.DIV. COMMENTS E[U O G /n grl 6i E C N l 1 G -M JAN 2 1986 CITY OF RRENTON rid JAN 2198E BUILDING/ZONING DEPT. 1004N CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE' ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST NO.: ECF-119-85 APPLICATION NO(s).: SA-100-85 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Application for site plan approval to allow the construction of three, two-story office buildings totaling 178,605 square feet on an 11.74 acre site. PROPONENT: Orillia Property Associates, Limited Partnership LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Located at the northwest corner of Lind Avenue S.W. and S.W. 39th Street. LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton, Building and Zoning Department. The lead agency for this proposal has' determined that it does not have 'a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. Additional conditions were imposed as mitigating measures by the Environmental Review Committee under their authority of Section 4-2822(D) Renton Municipal Code. Responsible Official: Environmental Review Committee City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055 Phone: 235-2550 APPEAL: You may appeal this determination in writing to Renton ;Hearing Examiner no later than January 27, 1986.. You should be prepared to make specific factual objections. Contact City of Renton, Building and Zoning Department to read or ask about the procedures for SEPA appeals. DATE OF DECISION: January 6, 1986 PUBLICATION DATE: January 13, 1986 I •III Rona d G. Nelson Orry M. 172i ger Building and Zoning Director Policy Dev= r•ment ector L�- Richard C. ghton Public Works Director 1;. • of R4, 11/ $ 0 0 BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT - o RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR L,9 Qy� MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 • 235-2540 O,9gTED SEPIcv0 BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR MEMORANDUM • DATE: January 13, 1986 TO: Fred J. Kaufman, Hearing Examiner FROM: Environmental Review Committee SUBJECT: Orillia Property Associates, Limited Partnership FILE NUMBER: SA-100-85 ECF-119-85 LOCATED ON: the northwest corner of Lind Ave. S.W. and S.W., 39th Street. The Environmental Review Committee (ERC), under their substantive authority [Section 4-2822(D)] recommends to the decision maker, the Hearing Examiner, that the application for site plan approval to allow the construction of three buildings totaling 178,605 square feet of office space on 11.74 acres located at the northwest corner of Lind Avenue S.W. and S.W. 39th Street is subject to the following conditions: 1. Installation of intersection improvements at Lind Ave. S.W. and S.W. 39th Street including a traffic signal and lane widening per Public Works Department approval. 2. The Public Works Department shall submit to the ERC by January 27, 1986, an area-wide traffic and circulation study bounded by South 1B0th on the south, SR-167 on the east. SR-181 on the west, and I-405 on the north, along with the extension of Oakesdale Avenue S.W. to SR-900. The study shall identify (1) a circulation system adequate to accommodate motor vehicle traffic locally generated in the study area at build-out office park intensity, (2) the total estimated cost of that system; (3) the total trip generation associated with said office park development, (4) an estimate of the per trip cost of constructing the system, (5) a list of those elements of the system which have already been constructed or committed to by pending developers and who receives credit (on a trip basis) for the cost of that construction: and (6) a prioritization of the construction projects needed in the immediate future to minimize the impact of developments currently being proposed in the study area. Fred J. Kaufman, Hearing Examiner Re: Orillia Property Associates„ Limited Partnership File Number: SA-100-85/ECF-119-85 January 13, 1986 Page 2 3. Participation in area-wide traffic improvements identified by the above traffic study to the project's proportionate share based upon estimated daily traffic generation as calculated by standards established in the Institute-of-Traffic Engineers Trip Generation Manual. The ultimate costs per vehicle trip shall not exceed $175 per trip. (Estimated 2,144 vehicle trips). 4. Credit for adjacent signalization at S.W. 39th Street and Lind Avenue S.W. will be credited against the project's projected proportionate impact and for other scheduled area-wide improvements if the applicant proceeds to complete instead of the City constructing those improvements. The Environmental Review Committee finds that the following facts are true of the proposed project: 1. The addition of 2,144 vehicle trips to the anticipated 1,840 vehicle trips associated with Phase II construction and a 980-space parking lot that provides 70% of the parking for the adjacent 266,000 square feet of office to the south is significant and requires mitigation. The project represents approximately 35% of all anticipated traffic on S.W. 39th Street. 2. The City of Renton must identify area-wide traffic circulation and improvement needs to provide continued public accessibility to individual privately owned properties. Without this formal identification by the City, the general level of service will continue to decline as a result of incremental adverse impacts resulting from private development. 3. The previous traffic evaluation conducted late in 1984 was based on a land use assumption of a much greater percentage of warehouse use and a lower intensity of office park uses. Actual and proposed development is office park in nature and this use generates significantly more traffic in addition to the general shift in type of vehicle trips. As a result a revised traffic study is necessary to reflect changing circumstances. 4. The total anticipated development by Boeing Electronics Company, Boeing Computer Services, and Boeing Commercial Airplane Company within the general traffic study area represents a known impact of 1.1 million square feet of office space and possibly 6,500 employees. This represents a doubling of 1984 employment in the study area. Therefore, the Boeing Corporation is a major contributor to present impacts and the ultimate impacts of full industrial development of the study area. The Boeing Corporation must therefore be a significant contributor to the solution. Therefore, the above conditions are necessary as a minimum for the preservation of the welfare and safety of the general public and a minimum to mitigate the adverse environmental impacts of the proposal. Fred J. Kaufman, Hearing Examiner Re: Orillia Property Associates„ Limited Partnership File Number: SA-100-85/ECF-119-85 January 13, 1986 Page 3 Under Section 4-2822(D), the decision maker must accept these conditions as binding upon his ultimate decision unless he identifies in writing a substantial error in fact or conclusion by the Environmental Review Committee. The decision maker then has the option of asking the ERC for reconsideration or revising the conditions. The applicant also has the ability to request reconsideration of these conditions from the ERC or appeal these conditions directly to the Hearing Examiner under authority granted in Section 4-2823(A)(1)(a) within 14 days of the date that the DNS is final. Therefore, the appeal date would be Monday, January 27, 1986, at 5 p.m. Appeals must be submitted in the form prescribed by both the Environmental Ordinance of the City of Renton and the Hearing Examiner Ordinance, Section 4-3011(B). RJB:wr:ss 1009N cc: (1) Edward Heavey Orillia Property Associates, L.P. c/o O&W Properties, Inc. 201 Elliott Avenue West Seattle, Washington 98119 (2) Robert Morgan, Corporate Manager Real Property Division Boeing Company P.O. Box 3707 Mail Stop 13-03 Seattle, Washington 98124 RENT' BUILDING & ZONING DEPA`'—MENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET . ECF — 119 — 85 APPLICATION NO(S) : SITE APPROVAL 100-85 • PROPONENT: ORILLIA PROPERTY ASSOC/ 0 &' W PROPERTIES PROJECT TITLE : BOEING ELECTRONICS COMPANY BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION TO CONSTRUCT THREE-TWO STORY OFFICE BUILDINGS TOTALING 120,000 FEET LOCATION : NORTH WEST CORNER OF SW 39th STREET AND LIND AV SW TO: EI PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : ENGINEERING DIVISION NTRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : ,_ OUTILITIES ENG , DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU DPARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT i OPOLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT OTHERS • COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P.M. ON REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVIS1ION : /r a A / El APPROVED [E] APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS [=1 T APPROVED 1 . Driveway entrances to be 30 feet in width. 2. Provide off-site improvement plans ;showing locations of existing street lights( in relation to proposed driveway locations. 3. Developer to promote ride-sharing and transit usage as condition ofldevelopment. 4. Left-turn channelization required for Lind Ave. at SW 39th Street and any roadway widening to accommodate the channelization as part of the off-site improvement. 5. Signalization of Lipid Ave. SW and SW 41st Street required as part of the overall development on SW 39th Street. 6. Provide two-way centerlane left-turn channelization on Lind Ave. SW opposite the two driveway entranc s off Lind Ave. SW. Include'all necessary roadway DATE: SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR R AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE # 17edadurt REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 v 4.-04 7. Provide traffic engineering analysis for traffic signal warrant at the intersection of Lind Ave. SW & SW 39th Street. Traffic signal will be required if warrants are met or near being met. _~ / II (-Deo(iu c9c,Cs PLAN REVIEW ROUTING SLIP DATE: / - / 3 APPLICANT: (') LJ P c.44+G / JOB ADDRESS: 'Sc..) `3 C 1/J L I IU D NATURE OF WORK: �.�d 6- /lU G (e) ,CIC/C S • TO: Comments Due Comments Due I VI ENGINEERING DIVISION /,;)- -e�' ) I I FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU I V I TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION /g -a 7 I I BUILDING CODE REVIEW FUTILITIES ENG. DIVISION I I ZONING & PARKING I OTHERS I I ENERGY CODE Comments or suggestions regarding this application should be provided in writing. Please provide comments to the Building Division by 5:00 p.m. on above date. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION APPROVED I • I APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS L„- NOT APPROVED • / ic).(6 r.1{.'�r)t / p/,!e.-a Gto/c Cvn-7'n7 c•'.,.•� 3. L.I. / -e. gco d- S w 39 Sr 7 -P-igt. jA pco„ fs 7�i` r' t- i t,Ste. s t/'Q. mot.�� • DATE /^ 2 - `r'6 Signature of Director or Authorized. Representative REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION Traffic Engineering APPROVED I_ I APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS I , I NOT APPROVED 1. Driveway entrances to be 30 feet in width. 2. Provide off-site improvement plans showing locations of existing street lights in relation to proposed driveway locations. 3. Developer to promote ridesharing and transit usage as condition of development. 4. Left-turn channelization required for Lind Ave. at SW 39th Street and any roadway widening to accommodate the channelization as part of the off-site improvement. 5. Signalization of Lind Ave. SW and SW 41st Street' required as, part of the overall development on SW 39th Street. 6. Provide two-way centerlane left-turn channelization on Lind Ave. SW opposite the two driveway entrances off Lind Ave. SW. Include all necessary roadway widening. 7. Provide traffic engineering analysis for traffic signal warrant at the intersection of Lind Ave. SW & SW 39th Street. Traffic signal wil be required if warrants are met or near being met. / �7 r Aq • • /MS�ecY fjE??&''e, �d�/S�rvC/�pLj • 7 DATE , 2 /5� Signature of Director or Authorized Representative 1/10-1 +l ci drtdei-OV 01, Lri--4 .fie s J Na Q7l/o A v . i l(s 1 • ') re .L.J 1_ 1.ti. S I- P7 RENT( BUILDING & ZONING DEPA MENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF — 119 — 85 APPLICATION NO(S) : SITE APPROVAL 100-85 PROPONENT : ORILLIA PROPERTY ASSOC/ 0 & W PROPERTIES PROJECT TITLE : BOEING ELECTRONICS COMPANY BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION TO CONSTRUCT THREE-TWO STORY OFFICE BUILDINGS TOTALING 120,000 FEET LOCATION : NORTH WEST CORNER OF SW 39th STREET AND LIND AV SW TO: • PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION • FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU • PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT • POLICE DEPARTMENT ▪ POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5.: 00 P.M. ON REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : rci3 CD APPROVED El APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS El NOT APPROVED DATE: SIGNAT E/OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 RENT( BUILDING & ZONING DEPCI IENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET CITY OF RENTON ECF - 119 - 85 NOV 19 1985 . APPLICATION NO(S) : SITE APPROVAL 100-85 pp,iry PROPONENT : ORILLIA PROPERTY ASSOC/ 0 & W PROPERTIES nFVF+_oQMFNT.npPT- • PROJECT TITLE : BOEING ELECTRONICS COMPANY BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION TO CONSTRUCT THREE-TWO STORY OFFICE BUILDINGS TOTALING 120,000 FEET LOCATION ; NORTH WEST CORNER OF SW 39th STREET AND LIND AV SW TO : PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : El ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG . DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : El UTILITIES ENG . DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT . I El POLICE DEPARTMENT , Ni POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ® OTHERS: i COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P.M. ON REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVIS'ION ; -fl5 GLOPYfl 1 L-T- II APPROVED Li APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS ID NOT APPROVED „ G1)(42 // / • g (4.44- /1/14410 #/ a4Je 4kC2 ge,j_e 644-ad otAX 'Oa .1 • i - ; h CATh , 0A074,27,"1 4( f /431&S----DATE; SIGNATURE OF DIRECTuR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVPSION 5/1982 Form 182 1003N r NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a declaration of non-significance for the following project: FANCHER FLYWAYS (ECF-121-85) Application for conditional use permit to allow the construction of two aircraft hangar buildings having approximately 6,720 square feet and 4,500 square feet respectively to house 7 aircraft in a P-1 zoned district, file number CU-103-85; property located at 243 West Perimeter Road on the Renton Municipal Airport. The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a declaration of non-significance for the following projects with additional conditions imposed as mitigating measures under their authority of Section 4-2822(D) of the Renton Municipal Code: BRYANT MOTORS, INC. (ECF-104-85) Application to rezone 8,240 square feet of property from R-1, Single Family Residential, to B-1, Business Use, file number R-079-85, property located 125 and 125 Meadow Avenue North; and application for variance from Section 4-711(D)(6) to, allow a reduction of required landscaping along Meadow Avenue North and North Second Street from 10 feet to 3 feet, file number V-102-85. ORILLIA PROPERTY ASSOCIATES, LIMITED PARTNERSHIP (ECF-119-85) Application for site plan approval to allow the construction of three, two-story office buildings totaling 178,605 square feet on an 11.74 acre site, file number SA-100-85; property located at the northwest corner of Lind Avenue S.W. and S.W. 39th Street. ORILLIA PROPERTY ASSOCIATES, LIMITED PARTNERSHIP (ECF-124-85) Application for site plan approval to allow the construction of two buildings totaling 153,300 square feet of office space on the 10.48 acres of property, file number SA-106-85; property located on the north side of S.W. 39th Street at the 800 block. Further information regarding this action is available in the Building and Zoning Department, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington, 235-2550. Any appeal of ERC action must be filed with the Renton Hearing Examiner by January 27, 1986. Published: January 13, 1986 FORM '115 r • • i ' NmENTA.,,. ARATioN APPLICATION NO. FCF-T19-R5 & SA-100-8.5 PROPOSED ACTION APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW TI IE CONSTRUCIIflN OF THREE TWO-STORY OFFICE BUILDINGS TOTALING 178,605 SQUARE FEET ON AN 11 .74 ArRF SITE. GENERAL LOCATION AND OR ADDRESS PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LIND AVENUF S.W. AND S..W. 39TH STRFFT • POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF . AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION. • THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE [ E.R.C. ) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION ODD ES LIDOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. AN . ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT DWILL WILL NOT BE' REQUIRED. • THE CITY OF RENTON WILL NOT ACT ON THIS PROPOSAL FOR 15 DAYS FROM THE DATE BELOW. COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY AN ! APPEAL OF THE ABOVE DETERMINATION MAY BE . FILED WITH THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER BY 5:00 P.M., JANUARY 27, 11%6 • FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT 235-2550 DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION .• OF 1 . 'A �� o� ° BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT z o RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR salL 9 co� MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 • 235-2540 • 0,9gTE0 SEPSc1,0' BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR MEMORANDUM DATE: January 13, 1986 TO: Fred J. Kaufman, Hearing Examiner FROM: Environmental Review Committee SUBJECT: Orillia Property Associates, Limited Partnership FILE NUMBER: SA-100-85 ECF-119-85 LOCATED ON: the northwest corner of Lind Ave. S.W. and S.W. 39th Street. The Environmental Review Committee (ERC), under their substantive'authority [Section 4-2822(D)] recommends to the decision maker, the Hearing Examiner, that the application for site plan approval to allow the construction of three buildings totaling 178,605 square feet of office space on 11.74 acres located at the northwest corner of Lind Avenue S.W. and S.W. 39th Street is subject to the following conditions: 1. Installation of intersection improvements at Lind Ave. S.W. and S.W. 39th Street including a traffic signal and lane widening per Public Works Department approval. 2. The Public Works Department shall submit to the ERC by January 27, 1986, an area-wide traffic and circulation study bounded by South 180th on the south, SR-167 on the east, SR-181 on the west, and I-405 on the north, along'with the extension of Oakesdale Avenue S.W. to SR-900. The study shall identify (1) a circulation system adequate to accommodate motor vehicle traffic locally generated in the study area at build-out office park intensity, (2) the total estimated cost of that system; (3) the total trip generation associated with said office park development, (4) an estimate of the per trip cost of constructing the system, (5) a list of those elements of the system which have already been constructed or committed to by pending developers and who receives credit (on a trip basis) for the cost of that construction: and (6) a prioritization of the construction projects needed in the immediate future to minimize the impact of developments currently being proposed in the study area. ,. s � Fred J. Kaufman, Hearing,, aminer Re: Orillia Property Associates„ Limited Partnership File Number: SA-100-85/ECF-119-85 January 13, 1986 Page 2 • 3. Participation in area-wide traffic improvements identified by the above traffic study to the project's proportionate share based upon estimated daily traffic generation as calculated by standards established in thee Institute of Traffic Engineers Trip Generation Manual. The ultimate costs per vehicle trip shall not exceed $175 per trip. (Estimated 2,144 vehicle trips). 4. Credit for adjacent signalization at S.W. 39th Street and Lind Avenue. S.W. will be credited against the project's projected proportionate impact' and for other scheduled area-wide improvements if the applicant proceeds to complete instead of the City constructing those improvements. The Environmental Review Committee finds that the following facts are true of the proposed project: 1. The addition of 2,144 vehicle trips to the anticipated 1,840 vehicle trips associated with Phase II construction and a 980-space parking lot that provides 70% of the parking for the adjacent 266,000 square feet of office to the south'is significant and requires mitigation. The project represents- approximately 35% of all anticipated traffic on S.W. 39th Street. 2. The City of Renton must identify area-wide traffic circulation and improvement needs to provide continued public accessibility to individual privately owned properties. Without this formal identification by the' City, the general level of service will continue to decline as a result of, incremental adverse impacts resulting from private development. 3. The previous traffic evaluation conducted late in 1984 was based on a land use assumption of a much greater percentage of warehouse use and a' lower intensity of office park uses. Actual and proposed development is office park in nature and this use generates significantly more traffic in* addition to the general shift in type of vehicle trips. As a result a revised traffic study is necessary to reflect changing circumstances. 4. The total anticipated development by Boeing Electronics Company, Boeing Computer Services, and Boeing Commercial Airplane Company' within the general traffic study area represents a known impact of 1.1, million square feet of office space and possibly 6,500 employees. This, represents a doubling of 1984 employment in the study area. Therefore. the Boeing Corporation is a major contributor to present impacts and the', ultimate impacts of full industrial development of the study area. The Boeing Corporation must therefore be a significant contributor to the solution. Therefore, the above conditions are necessary as a minimum for the preservation of the welfare and safety of the general public and a minimum to mitigate the adverse environmental impacts of the proposal. • 4 Fred J. Kaufman, Hearing'. miner iv Re: Orillia Property Associates,, Limited Partnership File Number: SA-100-85/ECF-119-85 January 13, 1986 Page 3 Under Section 4-2822(D), the decision maker must accept these conditions as binding upon his .ultimate decision unless he identifies in writing a substantial error in fact or conclusion by the Environmental Review Committee. The decision maker then has the -option of asking the ERC for reconsideration or revising the conditions. The applicant also has the ability to request reconsideration of these conditions from the ERC or appeal these conditions directly to the Hearing Examiner under authority granted in Section 4-2823(A)(1)(a) within 14 days of the date that the DNS is final. Therefore, the appeal date would be Monday, January 27, 1986, at 5 p.m. Appeals must be submitted in the form prescribed by both the Environmental Ordinance of the City of Renton and the Hearing Examiner Ordinance, Section 4-3011(B). RJB:wr:ss 1009N cc: (1) Edward Heavey Orillia Property Associates, L.P. c/o O&W Properties, Inc. 201 Elliott Avenue West Seattle, Washington 98119 (2) Robert Morgan, Corporate Manager Real Property Division Boeing Company P.O. Box 3707 Mail Stop 13-03 Seattle, Washington 98124 • ' ^ 1004N CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST NO.: ECF-119-85 APPLICATION NO(s).: SA-100-85 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Application for site plan approval to allow the construction of three, two-story office buildings totaling 178,605 square feet on an 11.74 acre site. PROPONENT: Orillia Property Associates, Limited Partnership LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Located at the northwest corner of Lind Avenue S.W. and S.W. 39th Street. LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton, Building and Zoning Department. The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. Additional conditions were imposed as mitigating measures by the Environmental Review Committee under their authority of Section 4-2822(D) Renton Municipal Code. Responsible Official: Environmental Review Committee City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055 Phone: 235-2550 APPEAL: You may appeal this determination in writing to Renton Hearing Examiner no later than January 27, 1986.. You should be prepared to make specific factual objections. Contact City of Renton, Building and Zoning Department to read or ask about the procedures for SEPA appeals. • DATE OF DECISION: January 6, 1986 PUBLICATION DATE: January 13, 1986 I ��J, owl - Rona d G. Nelson Lam"ry M. n ger Building and Zoning Director Policy Dev= •ment ector le Richard C. ghton Public Works Director 2164Z NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON HEARING EXAMINER RENTON, WASHINGTON A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS ON THE SECOND FLOOR OF CITY HALL. RENTON, WASHINGTON ON JANUARY 28, 1986, AT 9:00 A.M. TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS: ORILLIA PROPERTY ASSOCIATES, LIMITED PARTNERSHIP Application for site plan approval to allow the construction of three, two-story office buildings totaling 178,605 square feet on an 11.74 acre site, file number SA-100-85; located at the northwest corner of Lind Avenue S.W. and S.W. 39th Street. ORILLIA PROPERTY ASSOCIATES, LIMITED PARTNERSHIP Application for site plan approval to allow the construction of two buildings totaling 153,300 square feet of office space on 10.48 acres of property, file SA-106-85; property located on the north side of S.W. 39th Street at the 800 block. Legal descriptions of the files noted above are on file in the Renton Building and Zoning Department. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT THE PUBLIC HEARING ON JANUARY 28, 1986, AT 9:00 A.M. TO EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS. PUBLISHED : January 17, 1986 Ronald G. Nelson Building and Zoning Director CERTIFICATION I, JEANETTE SAMEK-MC KAGUE, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THREE COPIES OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENTS WERE POSTED BY ME IN THREE CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED ABOVE AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW. ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a Notary Public, in and for the State of Washington residing in e-LJ TU/-) on the )7 / day of January. 1986. (109-0-8&44 ( SIGNED: ‘41416-4)-Ljnt"J__ 2132Z NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER RENTON, WASHINGTON A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS ON THE SECOND FLOOR OF CITY HALL, RENTON, WASHINGTON ON JANUARY 14, 1986, AT 9:00 A.M. TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PETITION: ORILLIA PROPERTY ASSOCIATES, LIMITED PARTNERSHIP Application for site plan approval to allow the construction of three, two-story office buildings totaling 178,605 square feet on an 11.74 acre site, file number SA-100-85; located at the northwest corner of. Lind Avenue S.W. and S.W. 39th Street. Legal descriptions of the files noted above are on file in the Renton Building and Zoning Department. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT THE PUBLIC HEARING ON JANUARY 14, 1986, AT 9:00 A.M. TO EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS. PUBLISHED : January 3, 1986 Ronald G. Nelson Building and Zoning Director CERTIFICATION I, JEANETTE SAMEK-MC KAGUE, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THREE COPIES OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENTS WERE POSTED BY ME IN THREE CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED ABOVE AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW. ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a Notary Public, in and for the State of Washington residing in QCNr-0'J , on the 3 eo day ofJ , Icts . I/g, SIGNED' -1Ytr OF RF11/ V v �� © o z p hill a 11 TO9aae gTeD SEP1 " • 'City of Renton Land Use Hearing Examiner • will hold a A R „. . „ in • CITY.. COUNCIL CHAMBERS , CITY HALL - ON JANUARY 28, 19 s6 I BEGINNING ATq.GO P.M. CONCERNING: L REZONE From • To USE. PER IT SPECIAL / CONDITIONAL To • x SITE APPROVAL SA-100-85 I PLAT/SUBDIVISION of Lots SHORT • C PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT L VARIANCE FROM . n GENERAL LOCATION AND/DR ADDRESS: . LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LI ND AVE S,4 ', AND S.W, 39TH ST, LEGAL DESCRIPTION ON FILE IN THE RENTON BUILDING &'ZONING DEPARTMENT. ENVIRONMENTAL. DECLARATION ® SIGNIFICANT DNDN_BIGNIFICANT FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CALL THE CITY OF RENTON BUILDING&ZONING DEPARTMENT 235=255O '_ THIS NOTICE' NOT TO BE REMOV.ED-. :WITHOLS PROPER AUTHOR IZATI`OI'�1 .. . .L ,. .art ,,,,-,.,., ,r OF R4,4/. A 60 . ° BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR ..LL 2 o 43� MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 • 235-2540 0 SEPSE���P BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR MEMORANDUM DATE: January. 2, 1986 TO: ERC Reviewers FROM: Roger Blaylock RE: Site Approval 100-85 Orillia. Property/0 &W Properties • Please review the revised site plan. . Note the shifting of the buildings from Lind Av orientation to 3.9th. " The square footage is 178, 600. . Please return by January 6, 1986. Thank you OF 124,4, do 7. BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT z RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR del o MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 • 235-2540 90 co- 09grFD SEP1 ' BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR MEMORANDUM DATE: December 31, 1985 TO: Fred J. Kaufman, Hearing Examiner FROM Roger J. Blaylock, Zoning Administrator SUBJECT: Orillia Property Associates, Limited Partnership Continued Public Hearing/File SA-100-85 The Building and Zoning Department requests that the public hearing scheduled for Orillia Property Associates to constructed an office complex on the northwest corner of the intersection of Lind Avenue S.W. and S.W. 39th Street be continued from Tuesday, January 7, 1986 to Tuesday, January 14,1986. The applicant submitted revised plans on Monday, December 30th. These plans not only changed the orientation of the buildings from east to south, but increased the square footage of the facility. Both the staff and the-Environmental Review Committee will have to review the revized proposal. In addition we discovered that some of the information submitted on the application and the environmental checklist did not correspond. Legal publications for both the environmental declaration and the public hearing were published based on erroneous information. The Building and Zoning Department has already placed a new legal publication for the public hearing in the newspaper and we will have the ERC reevaluate the project proposal in a special ERC meeting on Friday, January 3, 1986. We have consulted with the applicant's representative, Mr. Ed Heavey, concerning the necessary continuation. He has agreed with our request in an effort to save possible legal procedural complications and possible challenges. RJB;rjb OF R4,4 �e �"' ' „ ° BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT 4 ' =" • RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR eat. 9 "� co� MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 e 235-2540 .43 0 94rFD SEPSot(P BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR December 31, 1985 Orillia Property Associates, Limited Partnership 201 Elliott Avenue West Seattle, Washington 98119 Re: Application for site plan approval to allow the construction of three, two-story office buildings totaling 178,605 square feet on an 11.74 acre site, file number SA-100-85; located at the northwest corner of Lind Avenue S.W. and S.W. 39th Street. Dear Sir or Madam: The City of Renton Building and Zoning Department formally accepted the above mentioned application on November 19, 1985. A public hearing before the City of Renton Land Use Hearing Examiner has been scheduled for January 14, 1986. The public hearing commences at 9:00 a.m. in the Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall. The applicant or representative(s) of the applicant is required to be present at the public hearing. A copy of the staff report will be mailed to you before the hearing. If you have any questions, please call the Building and Zoning Department at 235-2550. Sincerely, Roger J. BlaYlock Zoning Administrator RJB:JMM:ss 2128Z.1 OF RA, ° BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR 09 MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 • 235-2540 0,947' o SEP10.4' BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR December 31, 1985 Edward Heavey O & W Properties, Inc. 201 Elliott Avenue West Seattle, Washington 98119 Re: Application for site plan approval to allow the construction of three, two-story office buildings totaling 178,605 square feet on an 11.74 acre site, file number SA-100-85; located at the northwest corner of Lind Avenue S.W. and S.W. 39th Street. Dear Mr. Heavey: The City of Renton Building and Zoning Department formally accepted the above mentioned application on November 19, 1985. A public hearing before the City of Renton Land Use Hearing Examiner has been scheduled for January 14, 1986. The public hearing commences at 9:00 a.m. in the Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall. The applicant or representative(s) of the applicant is required to be present at the public hearing. A copy of the staff report will be mailed to you before the hearing. If you have any questions, please call the Building and Zoning Department at 235-2550. Sincerely, Roger J. Blaylock Zoning Administrator RJB:JMM:ss 2128Z.2 OF 1R4, �; ® ° BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT - RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR 0 O o. MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 235-2540 90 co. • 0941- ED SEP-r ' BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR MEMORANDUM DATE: December 9, 1985 TO: Fred J. Kaufman, Hearing Examiner FROM: Environmental Review Committee SUBJECT: ORILLIA PROPERTY ASSOCIATES, LIMITED PARTNERSHIP ECF-119-85/NORTHWEST CORNER OF LIND AVENUE S.W. AND S.W. 39th STREET The Environmental Review Committee, under their substitive authority [Section 4-2822(D)] recommends to the decision maker, the Hearing Examiner, that the site plan approval request to allow construction of three 2-story office buildings totaling 120,000 square feet on a 11.74 acre site in the M-P, Manufacturing Park Zone; located at the northwest corner of Lind Avenue S.W. and S.W. 39th Street, is subject to the following condition: 1. The construction of a traffic signal at the intersection of Lind Avenue S.W. and S.W. 39th Street. Under Section 4-2822(D), the decision maker must accept these conditions as binding upon his ultimate decision unless he identifies in writing a substantial error in fact or conclusion by the Environmental Review Committee. The decision maker then has the • option of asking the Environmental Review Committee for reconsideration or revising the conditions. The applicant also has the ability to request reconsideration of these conditions from the Environmental Review Committee or appeal these conditions directly to the Hearing Examiner under authority granted in Section 4-2823(A)(1)(a) within 14 days of the date that the DNS is final. Therefore, the appeal date would be Monday, December 23, 1985, at 5 p.m. Appeals must be submitted in the form prescribed by both the Environmental Ordinance of the City of Renton and the Hearing Examiner Ordinance, Section 4-3011(B). RJB:ss 2096Z cc: Edward Heavy O & W Properties, Inc. 201 Elliott Avenue West Seattle, Washington 98119 �+ , r�.M '- 1. ,''�y` T. A. I' A a +' 1 "r. +4i. +„4 •V 'h+ IF i. 4. e to.y '' :' ep. e..o O h T i.t. krrio9Zk0s1 t„1'••,•: .. . , t.44.t.l 'v, Tr+ � ��.,� 1; •.}'1' 1. 41 1.t F 4 _ ,o,1 , 1 ,,qqaia ,, C"r,.;, *fit �, r�,a� Y.; sva r; F t +,}7✓:J/ rz t y r a ,, Y`a x y + y,+ D"1 yd' , OVA ® •9. co. .f y)1 t ri i !;c4.01,vn t}}'''4. 14"rCti �:a s.' A' K111t,:.''''' ' . a'ilo..;y t ,.:.`i;��`5• O,94 SEP�E00 City of eton L . nd .. se Hearing Examiner will hold a I 7y «.h t'i ' < ,°44,4• µ r..` 4 M' j��k y. ..' T f 'r• o 4. J.:y*% M 1 aye-y+�+'w, tr $t u �d. t 3s t „ss. { t 4 �� s s ,,,,r, k ,r . w1Is S. r 'y;i! 4 a�: tt^pt irk Y �•'Yf+ ,1#+? r' ?i.ti ^fi+'4A �2 ' Tf '+' .# f ;t. r" ft' s, z Spy,. 4+ i •,r, '�F";4 �ir :::41; X # 4 �`{ t 1 '!y a� „q i L � 1 <a� , n ` aYF1 � ' t t ,� " +'14 ' "3 V y, yy { p, it'4 ��,,+, i � /"1 1tii^� ',-Y u,+' K 'i �,� �'T+�{ rS ))>!F _ i` �.i: litAt - i.4 , ," u q hy..k r :t �"`?"W y 7 . a A ih s } • k 1 , h Iat �^ {a ,,4„ •j�x • i y ) 3i M ?raj k 1'�• !1041 p• •$. 1 Pit, ; 44 ... r�, s ' t q (,'r _, a t • "^' yak , 4 A. .�°�t•/.4k ;1" .! i4' it'SN"4 k. P" 1'•� l .CN�y. 4,04i 01.. .{,V' '''r •,',� t M OP; r�,, ( o 1 CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS , CITY HALL ON JANUARY 74, 1986 BEGINNING AT 9:00 A.M. . P.M. mt N*, .„1 : ,4s " ' . ^: . ® SA-100-85 ri REz-• *, , ... Fr ,•: , , To . t „. 7. �F:.•!M c;i & L / k .•t k{ '', I a 1II � ".kf{ ', ,t. ) 1 ':i '( ' I t l•F N k F, X is!.+t k,. 4 «41 Ihi fan.R• a �A r.. `S":a_w la,4fr to/e.. N,1 * !, i✓ SI 11. / I X1 S r . '''' , 'I'' 'i 1 ''..! '1 ;': i' ILL I -, .4 i �• T" i I, �ji T/ wrnU ,r 1 Y,i f �•, {. .IL/ l • }ti 1 'kJ. �- Y f 4y.' lip (q E ,,ii,L xi f !• t 'IP i, i c-5,.1 ,,,, 4., I. - * 1„ kina, r • ' ' . i I, I '...: ''' kr' L.4"1 ; , - '' T A 4_ If k,. F•�1.4.r ../ i �1f. t Its; a . .. . . k t li ,' .1 ,,,,,,,, ' , ' _ GENERAL Lf i ATt i 'NI 34 a Di!! A. in"D LOCAIED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LINND AVENUE S.W. & S.W. 39TH STREET. . LEGAL DESCRIPTION O',' FILE IN THE RENTON 'y=IHILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT. � �{ FCS/ro '+_. -, h y� aI + e.+i ,;5 xs 1 'gl, r.'^',Y j=k" � 16 •u Tim. 1ati.a 1i iY 1• c + .i• st .'.' ''t 11�'",1. EC,x ,1 ,. 4, 1- U 71 pi II _B1 , ,' '\ I (CANT 'FOR FURTHER I. , FOHIVIATION CALL THE CITY OF RENTON BUILDING Sa ZONING. ®EPA' TMENT 235-2550. 4ii ' WI ®'aa 4 0996N CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST NO.: ECF-119-85 • APPLICATION NO(s).: SA-100-85 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Application for site plan approval to allow the construction of three, two-story office buildings totaling 120,000 square feet on a 11.74 acre site. PROPONENT: Orillia Property Associates, Limited Partnership LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Located at the northwest corner of Lind Avenue S.W. and S.W. 39th Street. LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton, Building and Zoning Department. The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. There is no comment period for this DNS. Responsible Official: Environmental Review Committee City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055 Phone: 235-2550 APPEAL: You may appeal this determination in writing to Renton Hearing Examiner no later than December 23, 1985. You should be prepared to make specific factual objections. Contact City of Renton, Building and Zoning Department to read or ask about the procedures for SEPA appeals. DATE OF DECISION: December 4, 1985 PUBLICATION DATE: December 9, 1985 /".•7 Ronald G. Nelson Larry M. Spr n er Building and Zoning Director Policy Development Director Ri and Houghton Public Works Director 0989N NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMIT TEE RENTON, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a declaration of non-significance for the following projects: RAMAC, INCORPORATED (ECF-095-85) Application for conditional use permit to allow the construction of a one and two story self-storage building having 30,850 square feet of area to be located in a B-1 zoned district, file number CU-062-85; located at the 100 block of Bronson Way N.E. (east of 1-405 and north of Maple Valley Highway). CHARLES HENDERSON (ECF-106-85) Application to rezone 30.99 acres from G-1 to R-1, file number R -080-85, and application for preliminary plat approval to subdivide said property into 126 single family lots into a plat to be known as "Sunset Trails," file number PP-081 -85; located on the east side of Duvall Avenue N.E. at the 2200-2300 block. CHEVRON, U.S.A., INC. (ECF-117-85) Application for conditional use permit and site plan approval to allow the expansion of an existing service station by removing the existing pump islands and canopy and installing a new, larger pump island and canopy facility incorporating a mini-mart building, file numbers CU-097-85 and SA-098-85; located at 1419 North 30th Street. ORII_LIA PROPERTY ASSOCIATES, LIMITED PARTNERSHIP (ECF-119-85) Application for site plan approval to allow the construction of three, two -story office buildings totaling 120,000 square feet on an 11.74 acre site, file number SA-100-85; located at the northwest corner of Lind Avenue S.W. and S.W. 39th Street. EVERGREEN SPA AND POOL COMPANY (ECF-113-85) Application for substantial shorelines development permit to allow the construction of a swimming pool for the residence of Frank I_ee, file number SM-012-85; located along the shoreline of Lake Washington at 5121 Ripley Lane North. ACKERLEY COMMUNICATIONS, INC. (ECF-089-85) Application to allow for the construction of a single faced, off-premise advertising sign measuring 12 feet by 25 feet; located on the north side of Bronson Way North on the Burlington Northern right-of-way between Factory Avenue North and Sunset Boulevard North (letter attached). GLACIER PARK CO. (ECF-109-85) Application for site plan approval for Arby's Restaurant and a short plat of two lots and one track for roadway purposes, file number SA -083-85; property located east side of West Valley Road at the 2700 block. Further information regarding this action is available in the Building and Zoning Department, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington, 235-2550. Any appeal of ERC action must be filed with the Renton Hearing Examiner by December 23, 1985. Published: December 9, 1985 FORM 115 N oT E ENVIRONMENTAL DECLARATION APPLICATION NO. SA-100-85, ECF-119-85 PROPOSED ACTION APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE CQNSTRU TION OF THREE, TWO STORY OFFICE BUILDINGS TOTALLING 120 000 SO, FT, ON All 11,74 ACRE SI* GENERAL LOCATION AND OR ADDRESS LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LIND AVENUE S.W. AND S1W, 39m STREET, POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE [ E.R.C.3 HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION ❑DOES 17.1 . OES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT ❑WILL jtWILL NOT BE REQUIRED. THE CITY OF RENTON WILL NOT ACT ON THIS PROPOSAL FOR 15 DAYS FROM THE DATE BELOW. COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY AN APPEAL OF THE ABOVE DETERMINATION MAY BY FILEDpWMCL ITH DETlig R „FIe TON HEARING EXAMINER 5:01.985 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT 235-2550 DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW Sl-._..'T REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: '65/C DATE CIRCULATED: NOVEMBER 19, 1985 COMMENTS DUE: NOVEMBER 27, 1985 ECF - 119 _ 85 APPLICATION NO(s). SITE APPROVAL 100-85 PROPONENT: ORILLIA PROPERTY ASSOC/ 0 & W PROPERTIES PROJECT TITLE: BOEING ELECTRONICS COMPANY BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION TO CONSTRUCT.THREE-TWO STORY OFFICE BUILDINGS TOTALING 120,000 SQUARE FEET LOCATION: NORTH ''WEST CORNER QF SW 39th STRFFT AND ITND AVF SW SITE AREA: 11.74 acres BUILDING AREA (gross): 120,000 Sq Ft IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS MINOR MAJOR MORE IMPACT IMPACT INFORMATION 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics' 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation L/ 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation L.- 14) Transportation 15) Public Services � 16) Utilities1 1,7 COMMENTS: �I) Go/',4-c6'4 c 01 r4 ,M a w p rep,r,--mac / 1 //de t Se-4411 I.6. G (a) ®;Ai ,'i,tram p ' RECOMMENDATION: FK DNS Q MITIGATED DNS n EIS REVIEWED BY: g46 TITLE: CND SP8'?, DATE: /✓-- z Z " 95 FORM #14 REVISED 9/10/85 tiWIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: 8(417 DATE CIRCULATED: NOVEMBER 19, 1985 COMMENTS DUE: NOVEMBER 27, 1985 ECF - 119 _ 85 APPLICATION NO(s). SITE APPROVAL 100-85 PROPONENT: ORILLIA PROPERTY ASSOC/ 0 & W PROPERTIES PROJECT TITLE: BOEING ELECTRONICS COMPANY BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION TO CONSTRUCT THREE-TWO STORY OFFICE BUILDINGS TOTALING 120,000 SQUARE FEET LOCATION: NORTH WEST CORNER OF SW 39th STREET AND IiNn AVF SW SITE AREA: 11.74 acres BUILDING AREA (gross): 120,000 Sq Ft IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS MINOR MAJOR MORE IMPACT IMPACT INFORMATION 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: RECOMMENDATION: DNS 1 MITIGATED DNS El EIS REVIEWED BY: TITLE: DATE: O FORM #14 REVISED 9/10/85 EJWIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW • REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: E-1 DATE CIRCULATED: NOVEMBER 19, 1985 COMMENTS DUE: NOVEMBER 27, 1985 ECF - 119 _ 85 APPLICATION NO(s). SITE APPROVAL 100-85 PROPONENT: ORILLIA PROPERTY ASSOC/ 0 & W PROPERTIES PROJECT TITLE: BOEING ELECTRONICS COMPANY BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION TO CONSTRUCT THREE-TWO STORY OFFICE BUILDINGS TOTALING 120,000 SQUARE FEET LOCATION: NORTH WEST CORNER OF SW 39th STRFFT AND ITND AVF SW SITE AREA: 11.74 acres BUILDING AREA (gross): 120,000 Sq Ft IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS MINOR MAJOR MORE IMPACT IMPACT INFORMATION 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health L 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics i c� 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and ultural Preservation v-"' Rate. /fu 3 `yj� `e"2 6 j14) Transportation .s6 7"a iy �,�sC i,714 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: 1 . Driveway entrances to be 30 feet in width. 2. Provide off-site improvement plans showing locations of existing street lights in relation to proposed driveway locations. 3. Developer to promote ride-sharing and transit' usage as condition of development. 4. Left-turn channelization required for Lind Ave. at SW 39th Street and any roadway widening to accommodate the channelization as part of the off-site improvement. 5. Signalization of Lind Ave. SW and SW 41st Street required as part of the overall development on SW 39th Street. 6. Provide two-way centerlane left-turn channelization on Lind Ave. SW opposite the two driveway entrances off Lind Ave. SW. Include all necessary roadway widening. RECOMMENDATION: n DNS J' MITIGATED DNS n EIS REVIEWED BY: TITLE: DATE: �l ' �� " � FORM 114 Qd REVISED 9/10/85 — w. 7. Provide traffic engineering analysis for traffic signal warrant at the intersection of Lind Ave. SW & SW 39th Street. Traffic signal will be required if warrants are met or near being met. - oi4VIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST RE J E Sh_ !- �a tsn Rrc D2,t. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: R `u-' DATE CIRCULATED: NOVEMBER 19, 1985 COMMENTS DUE: NOVEMBER 27, 1985 ECF - 119 - 85 APPLICATION NO(s). SITE APPROVAL 100-85 WV PROPONENT: ORILLIA PROPERTY ASSOC/ 0 & W PROPERTIES PROJECT TITLE: BOEING ELECTRONICS COMPANY BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION TO CONSTRUCT THREE-TWO STORY OFFICE BUILDINGS TOTALING 120,000 SQUARE FEET LOCATION: NORTH WEST CORNER OF SW 39th STREET ANn ITNn AVF SW SITE AREA: 11.74 acres BUILDING AREA (gross): 120,000 Sq Ft IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS MINOR MAJOR MORE IMPACT IMPACT INFORMATION 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources • 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: RECOMMENDATION: 15I DNS Q MITIGATED DNS . n EIS REVIEWED BY: �il TITLE: 4_ DATE: J •///9-1( FORM #14 REVISED 9/10/85 r. `tn'IRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW S:_r REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: O`r I C e DATE CIRCULATED: NOVEMBER 19, 1985 COMMENTS DUE: NOVEMBER 27, 1985 ECF - 119 _ 85 APPLICATION NO(s). SITE APPROVAL 100-85 PROPONENT: ORILLIA PROPERTY ASSOC/ 0 & W PROPERTIES PROJECT TITLE: BOEING ELECTRONICS COMPANY BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION TO CONSTRUCT THREE-TWO STORY OFFICE BUILDINGS TOTALING 120,000 SQUARE FEET LOCATION: NORTH WEST CORNER OF SW 39th STREET AND ITNn AVF SW SITE AREA: 11.74 acres BUILDING AREA (gross): 120,000 Sq Ft IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS MINOR MAJOR MORE IMPACT IMPACT INFORMATION 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural iesources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Yse 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: RECOMMENDATION: DNS 0 MITIGATED DNS Q EIS REVIEWED • TITLE: DATE: /%//5 4 T FORM #14 REVISED 9/10/85 LIWIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: O C,Y OL/EGAPC) DATE CIRCULATED: NOVEMBER 19, 1985 COMMENTS DUE: NOVEMBER 27, 1985 ECF - 119 _ 85 CITY OF RENTON APPLICATION NO(s). SITE APPROVAL 100-85 PROPONENT: ORILLIA PROPERTY ASSOC/ 0 & W PROPERTIES ' J4 1 9 1985 PROJECT TITLE: BOEING EL.E_CTRONICS COMPANY POLICY DF`!FLOPMEP!T DFPT£, BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION TO CONSTRUCT THREE-TWO STORY OFFICE BUILDINGS TOTALING 120,000 SQUARE FEET LOCATION: NORTH WEST CORNER OF SW 39th STRFFT AND ITND AVF SW SITE AREA: 11.74 acres BUILDING AREA (gross): 120,000 Sq Ft IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS MINOR MAJOR MORE IMPACT IMPACT INFORMATION 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals !� 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use t/ 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: RECOMMENDATION: DNS Q MITIGATED DNS EIS REVIEWED BY: Sk/e_44U N TITLE: 71.55t 0 lthner DATE: P140 _ FORM #14 REVISED 9/10/85 !r///7 _.,:IIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW Sh f REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: 'Pik S DATE CIRCULATED: NOVEMBER 19, 1985 COMMENTS DUE: NOVEMBER 27, 1985 ECF - 119 _ 85 APPLICATION NO(s). SITE APPROVAL 100-85 PROPONENT: ORILLIA PROPERTY ASSOC/ 0 & W PROPERTIES PROJECT TITLE: BOEING ELECTRONICS COMPANY BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION TO CONSTRUCT THREE-TWO STORY OFFICE BUILDINGS TOTALING 120,000 SQUARE FEET I LOCATION: NORTH WEST CORNER OF SW 39th STRUT ANn ITNn AVF cw SITE AREA: 11.74 acres i BUILDING AREA (gross): 120,000 Sq Ft IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS MINOR MAJOR MORE IMPACT IMPACT INFORMATION 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation /X 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: RECOMMENDATION: Xr. DNS Q MITIGATED DNS n EIS REVIEWED BY: TITLE: 3(kf • '„ J ` f7 DATE: (1/20 U FORM #14 REVISED 9/10/85 "{ "tt1VIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: (T I t•[T I ES DATE CIRCULATED: NOVEMBER 19, 1985 COMMENTS DUE: NOVEMBER 27, 1985 ECF - 119 _ 85 APPLICATION NO(s). SITE APPROVAL 100-85 PROPONENT: ORILLIA PROPERTY ASSOC/ 0 & W PROPERTIES PROJECT TITLE: BOEING ELECTRONICS COMPANY BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION TO CONSTRUCT THREE-TWO STORY OFFICE BUILDINGS TOTALING 120,000 SQUARE FEET LOCATION: NORTH WEST CORNER OF SW 39th STREET AND ITNn AVF SW SITE AREA: 11.74 acres BUILDING AREA (gross): 120,000 Sq Ft IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS MINOR MAJOR MORE IMPACT IMPACT INFORMATION 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: AEA RECOMMENDATION: DNS Q MITIGATED DNS E] EIS awn)/REVIEWED BY: TITLE: -�A/ /A/ E DATE: Il - - FORM #14 REVISED 9/10/85 1 OFFICE ARID WAREHOUSE PROPERTIE5,1 201 Elliott Avenue West,Suite 400 Seattle,Washington 98119 fibliJ P.O.Box 9847 Seattle,Washington 98109 (206)281-8700 November 20, 1985 CT! n:t F2 rii) Iv, q vii1 5 r. a .. 1 ,ri Mr. Jerry F. Lind '"-"-A NOV 2 5 1.985 L---" Building & Zoning Department Zoning Division BUILDING/ZONiNG 1:11.iiT. Third Floor Renton City Hall Renton, WA 98055 RE: CTillia Property Associates/Boeing Electronics Center Dear Mr. Lind: Enclosed heewith are the super K reductions of the plans submitted in conjunction with !the above entitled application. I have talked to the architect. He will be submitting to you supplemental drawings to more fully satisfy the requirements of item 5 in the application procedure. 1 . Thank you for your cooperation. Very truly yours, Edward Heavey EH:sv3.1 Enclosures • . . ti�Y o� •ITY OF RENTC T FILE NO(S): &��/ 00-1.5 • • E; © BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT Ecr-// 9-�'S • ..0 MASTER APPLICATION NOTE TO APPLICANT: Since this is a comprehensive application form, only those • items related to your specific type of application(s) ore to be completed. (Please print or type. Attach additional sheets if necessary.) APPLICANT TYPE OF APPLICATION NAME • Orillia Prdoperty Associates, Limited Partner- FEES Ship , a REZONE*(FROM TO ) ADDRESS 201 Elliott Ave. W. d SPECIAL PERMIT* CITY ZIP • = TEMPORARY PERMIT* • Seattle, WA 98119 CD CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT* TELEPHONE ES] SITE PLAN. APPROVAL • SPECIAL PERMIT FOR GRADE AND FILL 281-8700 No. of Cubic Yards: CONTACT PERSON Q . VARIANCE* I . From Section: * Justification Required SAME W Properties, Inc:-. gl Edward Heaver ADDRESS SUBDIVISIONS: 201 Elliott Ave. W. ® SHORT PLAT CITY ZIP TENTATIVE PLAT Seattle, WA 98119 Q PRELIMINARY PLAT TELEPHONE FINAL PLAT 281-8700 0 WAIVER (Justification Required) OWNER i NO. OF LOTS: NAME PLAT NAME: Orillia Property Associates, Limited Part- nership ' - ADDRESS PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: 201 Elliott Ave. W. 0 PRELIMINARY . CITY ZIP FINAL Seattle, WA 98119 P.U.D. NAME: TELEPHONE - 281-8700 Q Residential Q Industrial ElCommercial D Mixed r- LOCATION MOBILE HOME PARKS: PROPERTY ADDRESS Q Lind & 39th TENTATIVE • EXISTING USE PRESENT ZONING t--�t PRELIMINARY Vacant 11rP t__..J FINAL PROPOSED USE PARK NAME: 3 - Two Story Office Buildings NUMBER OF SPACES: - �4 e ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE 5 . SQ. FT. ACRES ' AREA: 170,000 S.F. J 11.74 /' TOTAL FEES �! , rl;�ur rttiviv,� TA-FF USE ONLY -- ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESSING DATtAM `7 I` H '} APPLICATION RECEIVED BY: © �- - ��' ' , '- APPLICATION DETERMINED TO BE: ' i, ,~ ;ED ` NOV 1985 Accepted . �S Incomplete Notification Sent On, �'I �-� ' By' BUILDING/ZONING DEPT, ' : ;(Initials) DATE ROUTED ADDITIONAL MATERIAL RECEIVED BY: Q� APPLICATION DETERMINED TO BE: • IQ ON) tJ,, 1 + 1 c155 Q Accepted Incomplete Notification Sent On By: • (Initials) ROUTED TO: 10 Building 4 . Design Eng. 011 Fire CSETParks Police Policy Dev. Traffic Eng. Utilities . REVISED 1-R1-Ad I Legal description of property (if more space is required, attach a separate sheet). Lot 2 Block 5 Burlington North Industrial Park, Renton II • i • AFFIDAVIT i, Edward Heavey , being• duly sworn, declare that I am ®authorized representative to act for the property owner,Esaan #44- K4rorsl == in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS r DAY . OF 19&. NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, RESIDIKe7 AT �oa� Orillia Property Associates, .5-24-h2rx„,:04(m6(x7 Limited Partnership � B (Name of Notary ublic) Carol A. Zipp (Signature of.Lmae€ Au orized Representa- tive 504 201 Elliott Avenue W. (Address) (Address) Seattle, WA 98119 • (City) (State) (Zip) _ 281-8700 (Telephone) Acceptance of this application and required filing fee does not constitute a complete application. Plans and other materials required to constitute a complete application are listed in the "Application Procedure." Fnrm #17,4 OF R4, A j, EC F: I ec F-//7-F 8S", t$ e z • City of Renton . LU: �� -�® o- � o ..1l. tr 0,9gT�O sEp-ro°P ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Purpose of Checklist: The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43,21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental Impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for allproposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. Instructions for Applicants: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply." Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the • governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impacts. Use of Checklist for Nonproject Proposals: (Please Type or Print Legibly) Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D). For nonproject actions (actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs), the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Boeing Electronics Company 2. Name of applicant: Orillia, PropertyoAssociates, Limited Partnership 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact.person: Edward Heave 201 Elliott Ave. W. Seattle, WA 98119 • 4. Date checklist prepared: 11-18-85 S. Agency requesting checklist: City of Renton.Planning 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Phase I - Building "A" May occupancy Phase II - Buildings B & C October occupancy CITY ofFiENTON H \\// M NOV 19'1985 BUILDING/ZONING DEPT. 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansions, or further activity related • to or connected with this proposal? if yes, explain. No 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. None 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. No 10. List any governmental approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. Site Plan Approval • 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. Three-two story office buildings totaling 120,000 Sq. Ft. building features are smooth painted concrete walls with gray tinted glass. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topography map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. The site is located on North West corner of SW 39th Street and Lind Ave. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. EARTH a. General description of the site (circle one); flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other Flat b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? c. I tint g neratI ak s of soils are found on the site (for example, caly, sand, gravel, peat, ;k)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. Sand & Organic Material d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. No — 2 — e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. Footing and structural fill, possible fill at driveways. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. No g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? 82 0 h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: Install filter fabric, ditches and rocked layad entrances. ' 2. AIR a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Dust and vehicle emissions during construction. Vehicle emission during regular use. b. Are there any off-site sources of emission? No c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: During construction, use of good operational techniques such as watering of exposed areas and regular street cleaning. Efficient layout of parking, driveways to reduce traffic congestion; therefore, 3. WATER less idle time and lower car emissions. a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. Springbrook creek (Drainage Channel) • • , 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. No 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or • removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. None • - 3 - 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximately quantities if known. Contruction of new storm drainage system that will collect run- off and detaining it prior to discharge to storm drain system located along Lind Avenue. 5) Does thr proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site clan. No 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste .and anticipated volume of discharge. No b. Grourk: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and appaoximately quantities if known. No 2) Descrrne waste material that will be discharged into the ground from . septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industr.al, containing the following chemicals . . .; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. None c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. See 4 on page 4 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. :_ No, possibility exists though if any of sewer pipes break. - 4 - d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: Storm drainage system including catch basins, underground pipes. • • 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: la deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other o evergreen tree: i�r,cedar, pine, other El Shrubs ® grass o crop or grain o Wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other o water plants: water lily, eel grass, milfoil, other o other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Addition of new landscaping, removal of existing ground cover. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None rd d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: See landscape Plan L-1 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: Birds: Hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other Crows ,Sparrows , Robins , Finches Mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other Fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. No • - 5 - d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: Landscaping of the site (2% for wildlife as required by code. Construction of a Pond. • 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas. oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Electricity.,pf/and natural gas for heating. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: Insulation of roof, walls and slab as required by energy code. 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. No 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. Tenant will provide emergency services as required. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: See 1 b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? Traffic along Lind Avenue. - 6 - • 2) What types and levals of noise would be created by or associated with the project on ' a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Noise during construction between 7:00am & 5:00pm traffic noise between 6:30am and 5:30pm. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: Limiting construction to daylight hours and use of quite equipment. • 8. Land and Shoreline Use • a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Site is .undeveloped. The site to the north is vacant, to the east is Lind Avenue, to the south is SW 39th street and to the west is vacant lot. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. No c. Describe any structures on the site. None d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? No e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? MP f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Commercial g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? None h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. No i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? 1300-1400 Employees j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: None - 7 - 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: Buildings are designed to accomodate primarily office use. Portion of Building C will be used for Cafeteria. 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. None b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: None • 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed. Buildings are constructed of smooth painted concrete walls and gray tinted glass. Tallest height of the building x tsd sq. .HVAC27' 0". b. What views inithe immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: Heavily landscaped parking areas and around building elevations. 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? Parking and building lights at night. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: Use. of low glare fixtures. - 8 - . 12. Recreation a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are 'in the immediate vicinity? None b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so. describe. No c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant. if any: None 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so. generally describe. None b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic. archaeological, scientific. or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: None 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. Lind Avenue SW 39th Street ' b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximately distance to the nearest transit stop? Yes c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? The project will provide:9-K. stalls and none will be eliminated.• ' d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or str not including driveways? If so. generally describe (indicate whether public or private). Possible signalization of 41st and Lind. - 9 - +-• e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. Yes, rail abuting the north and west property f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. Estimated trips at peak hours are 7:34 AMand 7:34 PM. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: Staggering of shift hours, improve ride-share and transit utilization. 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally, describe. Yes, emergency only. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. None 16. Utilities a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Hook up of natural gas, storm sewer, sanitary sewer, water and telephone. C. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Proponent: • Name Printed: Edward Heaven • - 10 - 17 . ' ' , ,' '4 "' Y ..:.gig óURRE. 'T Lid 4 M—P^ .r �. 9 siss `\ ,...---- s,:.7 _ - t \\,•,.. . -s .� \ U :..., 11 METR \ 1 .III•.,.. , , I 1 ,. I W'' P it ''--- - - - - -....• I ;G-, 1 L 1 :w L-1n . . �1 .. i I ` 1� I . IIIIHIUH�^�I,N H np1 pl HII • Npgl Ilp IupuH pllll� M INI Mgll ,.....y '• \ Ih ,. arlutl6 r./Mln �IIIIISI `_ -11_1 -- S . r gal__ 6.0:.....;.0...1:vt:::: ..„,,a5,1 ,- .._. 1 4.7.... ....--_ _,.------_, .w.,,w,•. / 4Ida - -11-,. -. ... - • L-1_____..,-----‘ • ,, ... •• .-ATI:r liene.:7 - '.., t. ‘Pia INI •-..• .- I� . 7( i — • r: i�: !FOX!� - " iI 11 ,. ) . .� as )i,, I ' Mil MEWZ \ � ', I ! a ' 1—__— I II =.�. G- 1 'I' G-1 -- - _d I: 1 I J I Q I I ,( _ - s 1 ,. 1 Poi : 1— 1 t .1; / _ A ._..... ._. � V b I' ' / I' IypMV.Ii • .4KM • . _ I_l�� 1 G_ 1 a-1_ ` - � oii; w,- ,'\ R-1 _ a vat. v... , A so G- 1 s I „ 11 so p��pD w >.. I Vpo4p�7 ZONING CLASSIFICATIONS .� 1 4OA b�% 1 e o M-P Manufacturing Park P-1 Public Use ;- I , , II , I i$A: 0-P Office Park R-1 Single Family i• 0. L-1 Light Industry R-3 Multiple Family ® I' ---I I I - `,�, H-1 Heavy Industry R-4 Multiple Family . '`w' I o B-1 Business T Mobile Homes 0-1 General ' .<s. M. L-1 t,V . M If °n \ 4,-6 • 47y11 B-PI H-.1 . ' jw • / 'I; ' �i�• ;) .g.20.ry. .,.sit. ~:I4i1 ' gum... co nee ,//• '�� H � ,,. � ,• offoCITYiOF it ✓/ . 1'1' ;� •— 1 ,.. . r I o, 4 il , IT]) rn,-. .. \) _ff: -ii - ,__ __,i _ _ ii L11] . 1 i.p if ,III-�1 I -pz.__A- ..Gfn,ti [)U'LDINC / Q1 fir ... . B-1 M- L-1 J I ' 1 ' 1 3 ./ JL -1-_7 r -- •-1 \_. .._ :►..i_Yi___ ••r;'� ,-. `+4:4167.i.`n„ ...- ,41 Slei‘._•___ ''''' . 0 p • ------•_•-......,.. ... \\" . , ..... . F 10POSEDT ...17:_.-- - --T— • I \ ar I' . --.411 17 -p o I \ I �•.:., •• rP V.K `' --- — 1 EI I �y� I ' 1 • — U' . j- --• ---- � ;-- - cexuu N"' l�� • 1 �� \ I ` . ! �•" 11 ,�,,,1n 1 III" "N' 1 •�• ,01 ilium a I. x1�,M,1d� ak ---r - - IN ��'�/ -_...low 1 nm -■ I __ z�s �.� . • , ��1 .IIN1W1„ur•;IxW1 � '1,:IunN• ._ - /Rj-: . I ::=-1?.._,•-•.: - Ka..in _ ,. -1... .I., - i,iptim-i = ±-:- I!,.. .7,„....... ..--,.zi_.::_rai m r -:1 im.‘7., ,,, , i N--- _ -- ----\ . 1 a--,-!--.i, - . ... "'•11172. I OV . 1 a ! _ _ \\, . ' '. li i' 1 ,., ) 0 P --1-: , = , 421. 11 , i'I J Q ' I I_ .. J I e-._ , . Pe ..1 4 ,.... _ .---‘i 1, : ;i,_ . . g • t it ;-) Y-• 1 / c - [l(NEM1Y1 1 �I I / f • • i►. :ate°�= -- M-P-" � :errs. I e 1. ' I 1. !' " I I I '� IN V�e lZe, r ZONING CLASSIFICATIONS diI 1I II i0V44ea M-P Manufacturing Part,, - !ii 1 f 6��i O-P Office Park l;I :^ a -I I . ill I Goa, L-1 Light Industry • ;� 'O -JI ' I l_ :�•; B-1 Business ,•_,�___' I I IIli •� • P-1 Public Use _' R-1 Single Family l , ;r,1! , .a . I 7�I ii • R-1 G-1 General ..� --` 4 f .2_. '4 . 0 , • ) • re- 9 1. "' I....;C. a / 0 �,1' . 0 C O~ ,, u. ' I II!. 0 "gm t i �--_ _ ,1s M_p 1 - ue -: . i, �� • ` I l 4 r 1 up ,, -os.+u IC I i II r_. .1I I �In --a. . I I- - . : ' i I III / r • 1_._I 17r • oF FILE • FILE TITLE • • Iff •8. 16111 MOW it f1110111.11 • • • • • • • • FF 3 mIDo-65 a SERIES r l I• • 1'.?�ajil, '.,1Yrf,_,. n'yr�„5:'rr` ,•h;i ,.. • :. `'i,`>''W•$vA;j3 .�".1}{,q'}if. ^„ d`3 { hi 'i, �I,,.c'yar. ;.5:!r • .!•,.v,• - .k: rv" , dr t�, `k t .• +v V,y','� 7y� ,,' • '.r,.'h; •�•••''.. ..y7'"j;�` •.-r�. • "•'',` ,�p\' .,i�'D'.,�1�''1Cw �Ti {L. �+�v:,it{A 5;,,r � a Tq.l� C'�V:��.r't',- ,�.P .f.�'f"':.s,�",- .•F,. ` ,{ ''}�'.� ,. y p�7''�','d,ti Vi,. ,y��} �je' I A?i� � ;; , r •bJ ',�°.i+4 �P`: ;.�-�i"•9�`• ',,._. .I. :.'i.,'LP�{P i T ri:'.1',f �i i 1O J'7,I ' I� lY'....,,,L',tV.if..'A �: :;F<,r;::�,,. .,� y;�„ f{.� �. .�. �'• a�,��h!��1!Y-9`augo'lig,t�plight ..�; : :�� ...,•: : ,' -;: t;'M .,w;.-��'. 1 � t. a G i u ��• t'v."srecoil'i�e ,rs.'a" �:,:. .��,,,. It 't - r .v 5!y,>}.:-,":•,x'1;�" �. �."',�✓ �' p&- x.'F t. .3?•$';�jpf .�,.:r:A'N•{:.+tL'a A.FJ s,..t,y�: • .f�..�!�;.•,,,.� t i7t" a,i. Y,':�. .�,°�;c''.y : �'a, 'a �1� i ,. ra .Jii.q, , ,,_ , t w .�"�,"`�,� �,,..,rl#�I� , Le �Q N e s, a Qa ;0r ti ♦l �`'f ,, �"G�, J i. .if :hy. �6�7. T .K•1• 1't`, ':.. ;!{'9�w;',jtf ,.6 ,}5, �t`, `Tn•;r ";JY,�.,, :.•..>:xi�•i'>':4b.:s #•t4. .ti,, -, .P r..,,r IR b7' i �.�,7 th` ,1' t 4 ,. ,. .�: r;,:�- :�:§, '��t , �g *fat Q Q � ,rQ: .e: .�l'es�fer2. 'S. .,\�• ✓ .Lr'.•.P t !4:'� � Sr tit!'Fir+i:t vJ a � p 4L= - r A Y >Y• h 1s t r ��'�• +�;�. :�yt,,, .�;` ,,,".� -����;�; .�� � ,��.r,@.�� ��1Q�:1..lOt� ��•or tor'colors.ra �:.: ~,.��.�i`1 .: ., ... ,:1� � f ,s jtjp�3' ,f�q -� .,,x rt .to,;S:.J'1^` �b' .�•'�1a d" I:� i L4;•�`p.g 'a,'�.... ;:.''�4h;. :t { ,\y*°6c�"'A.}i:;(faa" i J( 4 h r ..,+'«i ;' .,Y:`�'x•,.it, r.1 a0,i }�� f7P jP:t.�. 5�,'i+ �J ,J:k�r 'j(t �X'. y,'s' .,.�'i 1 �', ''tFL 'M i.�.UU•'�.):'� opy. n,4,,.T:S.dry f:=}.-1 .3 ,. s ,K •r� 9, •tx , . :,; a:t 1 : a`k . . )'r ).a . '.�:r},.cs .1 I a Y 4.j. I Imo, 'y.: 4 p til t" Q.i a r;y� n t. �i..5'1t 1.�: 7• j1,: •_ k! ti I., + m•r.,f :l i,,,."st:44,4!"...., '' r#0,.�.;� 'i -,1.- , '/J6r lAld A,' l:I y'.10,{,A. q�.� �!Jii'Iu 9r�fiecto r,'R—';ca,;,:,,, el '1^•< ',(1::,,ti h,t.t•f'! ,,.:•i; yy•nl:t r y3"i `i }: s5 .a a it' ts' '1 . .1W1; ,-V r K�Y�HAY.,•-•91• + 61x•a; ti (e, ..n„ • ''t•. r •'.i. "i Y '+'f.`“ 4 3e:7., •*i. C r i J tr :: r•Q _ +' _ ,; r . r �• 6. b •'..."1 tit rRrf�w;� 'vA{t , dedr tt t i • (G ' • ,+rr' • +ti� 1 ��} '.d',if ta. ye.• t.r �.3`+�. Gr�+ �.-,.. f e^cr"q?y,4 :it7 q.,(M+�.J'k .�": �, ,�'irl,,,r;. a'?': .''3'4 .L�,.� F y .s••L!e' ..q' a 3 •t .`, i s ,1 ,L•''X" �' 0,'$ i ,}�(t��� •I'i/}��►• ., agr t, t,N i f1.5 § �l i' T 1 ,1"3f+c.411,. 1.tG.,.ryfa�'r'� Ys ,�y:i,° wit'', F '''I ' • -:,; rI ', ,L,4 �t. �X .7.' 'T, <r^'t .1PiPm' `id ;1 ri•d Y �J,,� ,u.}•,ri. •,A,•�4;,. t' 1S t r 'j; r 'w ,:Ni.. 1,,,': R r4 ''' 5 D % , ;i: 1' •i"n0 "y4 ,7 a -' •G•4, p�,p 'vr` ^',,,,,ie•• Aoa, .. t J". t.. Jt+ ,i V.TF# i, •k l, i,,ro S Y• � y�' t :4 .4'ff .� ] ,,raj r .4A.T!� '..�' x' 1 r,s _r i ix,,M,.> Is 1'S^,t 1 v,t,ffi',.., '=fir , r•'#X ;Mk' .•.G`J d, .fdr'.,.F" •; "J"r•,'t•'&. , 1 y;, 1 i Y *if.::, , �* f5 1 v { ,, t r�p,, �jt �,c f i V/t olu! ' 4 7` .*���yw �h ! 'Y�'1 � r kY1`� �4? �.r t+ yr t '40" w?1{��7! ,'��+1 � J' 1{,S,), M�p/,F fi;gaf,lctM,l�`?�)Q �1�1fy�aitWv'�r �y..}� �t A'✓ .,.:j i� t e�;i a,rl.,'1, • .� % YG, Y!ki'l„L }.'i:5". 4 PL''4 s: T'* i• 5, oti'd „i�,q,i•hyr.F;{,rti ta.,G'4I,yY,4>':u'I�tAcNa irk Yat1� r. F='r, y; ., + ' J• , ,a +• i't t 3` r ,,- Q t C,,:•i ,r.s., U'tiC + i,`NA ,I 4 • -. •-t �� f , c ,€ N. � i ,4,1�, '}�., e ,r � � y .,�di.}t;J 1 ��% 1'•• �VJ�P•niarr',sl;l .if,4:o � r.t: Ea �. '+,' �r `.�•i I tI, .•t�t�+ 3',y� .'•< y 1s r �''°: IN �,, �` lire,"", , ei' U3",+ �'�.a,�p��>�yi�°rj` •t t n, •r, , Y « jY� 'ur + - ''r Py I {1ffi,+�9 1'4 I S9 �j +i j +°4't v'to j,;tg, ''t; ,�!,.L�j7 r. ;i aat, ,� of 1�'�y ir,ry x,`�"� '34�, YS+' ,�'" 6,:�� ;,' .>a�e xT�g t�'�al y 71,�t •'�,'�tii f:a'gf+f�,fYV SC. "i .),.r (d I, ,i7 .S:, S "p, f N.r d t' �4, Ps, "i; ��` ,Lh r��$'l.�� ..1r�%t.Si i �'<fr �:t ���';x5r'+�•'A '4•,r`+p? pn.� , q7n \ �;: , v :r -. sx i } e i f:%o,A. ::y k,a• ,' .i✓,:;�Jr,l 'SS' t �r Y�-S 1-` ',i ,, � r� '4 � s s t „„..hi''.-:;!,',..�� '., Y -'S.A ��,,?..,.,-�1 ,a )��• I :1���"..iSZ.,r �' :`i', yr ':. 11., t7'.'t,i elf :' , '' .pnC".R'. Ak°1 'fiy �Yl'� 4,41 •Wear',. I -.1[•lr �/ld iu u 1.Y? ont Opf: ;oL ,�.',: $z , 1.r } 'u�N'S.�" ,TT' A" Ei {. S3 cfv9f` 3^ rti 3 s° r ,. , / .ry w i,� Syr {•.•` , 1,�q♦ +, .:,t. x :..1 v U f`Y'. '*i,s} l� . x x,•• D(� faR 4 I ,k"':t wi �Mmt t4 ti I �MI',L,u'•r' it • r'` I ,tN f «''3\ r d 5 y l+,, 31+C r"lY ' 4''''''wit' Hi,,tpr :i};• i``S1A$�� t`' �, s} 'gr'l.y, fc,rF`"'• :ir=lvFi� r,,A, t ,. ,t t"34- rG.'S', K 11 v h-."IrNt�f 10 s '. ''•�'� •r�l .a t 'a,. #�. `i+ //{{�� r�t+�,`},•I.�r -yi• *i r,,r •..,,,,r,e .e I/ f' .r, +r +c'4oL'l ii,i?r,34-r',`' 04 1'"c,,r a"« f*r •i ,.a,. ' I ftir b,r^ 1 L t, f,1 ,L' ¢ *: �§ • LI yArt ,1 �,�II�� Iz'�,;,,4s�»s`I, 2 ,.y, { ' .Yi t., l ti.1 '��3.:'.z:"}$ ``',.'7'~4 gbh':i'1. ,4 f.r' t i' b�:u t._ 'h + 4 .4 ••:. I' n �'sitiltiA:,';ru, R'?'u:e•; +. 1 h[tr ' 4:•':;i>..;r;c^, >; �y, �{_ f] .i [� 'i`f'r,ii 13: +:Si";^ry,:•Pi.;t_ '. ,,ai•.t�>. '`r, ,:.Y' ' ,a;;; .:$.ri:.,IFIR:6:r. ;rs';, `� a,,c-itiM4- yis9: ::g�.1�r' _ ' , V� 6' .1 ;Q:, -a . 1� a.,f�af "} f ,., 9j'a+a'?a ': ��}}�PtG�� 'dd 3�' url . G d ;airy tr"s f O i „t .:d- r �;7`JC�43�t off :.'r`. �;t.>`•'1` . ;:,si`r,;a.. �•� ,v.is 4�k 'v.r^q lr+ F,d'.,�d a� �' ..Y'- � A' �}�' `sky -.5.i., _ .,.„i'r;`:a.r": e'•n '.'j„ti,: t,.,..:..4:r 't3`5��r t'+` ° 1,e`1. 3:ti'� �71' y71.1 4 '`�, �k' �F "•e,�''i'-. i;,,l•li. -'':i: ~'C`C:-- .,an.e:a?'.: -F.j,';, t .S .ng*7 az �. 5 it A, J J3,, 1. �3.t, ,.a..3.: : ' .�1 t: <.'+d'y,. •'1:'. ,P" ":.1; ,: �'I.:rtirJ.iJh'�,+c"?''.L--:aX .� ��;,'.,� 'g,, -�; f•`• ,;:P• led 3' fr~�. e.,`'F:l�.'^J,i -{� `xi`µ'���n+M {,,r�r .4,, ..};;` ^�; •:,. ,.F:' ,.,,,_`F.'' .:f,".1,,?' .'• :Y- S'r, {scar,,,, ;; 4'e aj i'r i.,7r t3"r' '�,n",15tOld t e ,' ,tj .e, .,?:h9i'`• :&? "a.1=` - .w ,.{-i;;r::,, ,.rp':,`':,�M,,�,�. '+�7 �rR�lc,' } •4;:. ;�E^�a J'�' ,r�, �Y,+ r� ..�+j -�,.l,.�jr�., b!,} �( �„a4y�,�� k.�M1�or,�",,.'�,y� ..j.. ;t+, if^. ',i;:r,. j`_ -:irk`>'< :1;i:4.,-•,g, 9t,G11. �{s'd` !, '1u 11, '4 2s ..n•3�`.-'' ..i , :+s-.14., ```04"nri-if . u r•st, ,;�, .,�t�t>�;����.'i�'�:.�q•;,yt.;: -• S:':y s'�':`;'�i��rccf'.-'S`-��"'9,�. �v�.r.•-� •.4.` � It�e� QQ �q$ �`' �i'a'.�Y,r '� •L'ai4*..ii>s•"- .•�. S• . .: .-1'..+ i•k x111.,,1 .. �, 7 ,l _ (j 6A .M� lv . 'a �. M•'6' %� ;`-•,:y;,, s".�.,r .-. :;'..,;+', :r,t,i;' tiff.?`2i'.. '.1.';'7v a3,k }.,'�.. '�,.�. r�, :an��.t,,,.1..i ^'A �y+: „;q, � ,.'tz�'y��tt,�,,f.t.�,.; `•3� .,P�:�;..,.`-��i';L �#. A. g�`:.�.',-.�.�' _ - ii-Sf. �"'i•: 'qrr. Ny,�L';%l�}}' .�� n' i. J3 §i4Y,i���w. €,iJJrC ������ 3L.:�,�+ ��., �•1 Y',^I�g,,. ;% :t:,,,,+.�? :;j j h, J''.' ,.''',- sr.' '+S'r.•'�f` •`; �%S ` ,+r'?', rl�„47c F 1 nl' �"�� �' , d ,, 4 „'u„ l at; t ' Iliz t t.' lel : � „� `d� }�s# Q[�I't®I1(�$� s � "F'�` � .t a:°�4,1yu Housin EPA+ ft �sR }r }�ti v�i;F,� u,. a� .� a=. a€ ( • t, i8 } r a)'4, P t°�'. A'' 3t.R Ls f� i ./ q •i� } /s�,.ti ' ,,,' 250W(HPS)& tti''- +. a for ea ,r ,� rAea& ...19• ri 9st,,, a t_ �"O £ t ' ;Hf( .;; 400W(all sources) 2.3 ft.21.22 m2 t3'l .c;.' R 13 ,.r�rna„4.yap. ; •-4,i,.• f • r1,p �, , ,,,4,. ''"' 1000W(all sources) 3,0 ft z1.28 mziV. `1%V(^ .� • t SK �,n� �u �'4% y„ 1>`"yy'r ' 1 ryF,5` , ; •,'. : Y w 3 ! 'Y'.>4 :.r°rr A, -ark Yy �� „t,1, x. 't'r+ • .,, n .::q� .•w, • ;!: ' •S,r ,^T, 1 0,,V-f . �f r.. G .S ' EL i �7; :�- Above EPAs Ir1clJ�ds mouriljng acm.` } r;: � � " l.r to;',, r r,v :'�•;,yr s tv ?':NOT� arMA,cl uct. "?.OB �.i.i;.=. • "r;.. Fi ,_ .. rVµ 1;' -' t +' '34,...:7'�,,,'. I, , w F, 1 . _ na l, .m above values;; • Ie y d' •Sr 4 t J `�y i '•,� ill +:Gq1,4�;}3. ..i:':._:i "A:.v,; .n.t i� ..•',}5; ..v2,i'';:t'.7rrrF•'{-,�`'„�.r.' °�,.'.. ,rr. "� +. a •t5'r i`c.y -:+,t+. ,&t �` rd" :� ;�fj<r,iu '¢.1+j �o' { S•.:n;,;ra<<`' .:.ii' };:' ,xti:'1...,;,r;�.r;77st'aa:..y,..:.r,y{r,, .t,i.r.. .•..� ',:_ r - 'e " ;Irt + if=; t' t' :::t'kr- "7iY.,3;-j+,.,,. !:,,G 1+ >:' �,� .r"ci' ',F z . ";a;,,,,, Z• r�i7^ t5r,,, 1 �,tr, `S '. '�'� ,:�, ,, y" '.,t sh 'or '',,f",' ..P", i.j G ••,.,'a,tv„�.: '.„:„ -, %3' ,"}qZ.r,,,� ':r_,,,y,,•n.•rtK`�:c'w`g:i,v ,v�S,vt,. r r� ri ,„+ rSI,�. 2; o:,�V,-,s,r _ ,iil:?,�t�,ts`*j s < "% , r f ,r w:,•a A•�` ,'F`�°' ''1' •r '.' '-r' a. F^t' ,,y4,,. Ef,"�!y;«`"°. �! '''T ,rbj .'„'�' .$"t,«{ (�,',r:;i(41 I.�y;i'�,�?C'•17 ` '. J+ i ,.di ,;ei,'li,l r•a' 0;f`•,,Je::;r.',ra,l- �"0 ay, J. s::P i qY ,'1 j$ ^° �i-.y,, s� 'L `i , ., ,2',,'s'-'pY�< �,i�,+„� t.r..',y`, "��•`;'•���`7�a ::1'�Tt���'`��i�,. $�v;:It.' atfr<q 1�rri��•. ,,wt'^ t.j,t ,t�i}� r�:t,,l�' t F !�� ��'j`� �x i.•p,r J rr:• '�'ri' �•i:r �r.,. :�:�7t�?re.•°sy.l..:Lr a.,t�,;i'-r.�:da',ya',:(;,':p. 4. cv ;�i �:,: ,�}.`V�',r�...�+., ,.E� p ` , �y ,t} ,�,, .r, .t .:t,u .ATIiii • of W;�+'� �i��,^; �i.uµ9 v :� i1,�, S ,f' '8' f-p;: �t a ..ct� _ acl;, »„'7 i'S =S :ue r+.`ar r(„'ra:. i:M. 'IV, �Y 3 f.9C't� .r , y� s [ t3 i"4; -d21..:,•y0.: 'rt:'•v:i•yr^^-:' ,;,i;' : , j,. :•.y;'` J 04".-7G7;f•. 'h4 ,9 r ,�. yt';';fe -- ,:i'i k'� ', ," "�;r't" s, r �,:c.f �':1, -; " t,, ^ r:c R;; . �1y•1 J 454 ,� `<` a•. ,4. :R,},_�4 rJ +A 4 t"4,.N z. y [ i'- '. • yf�.tr 'a -"X,'r " ..., �' 14 x ,y r.. d, A 3t4t 1�,,,&,i.+ v! t �:14-w, ,, `. , P'`r�Yr{ �.Y .n : ' r' +. „'F9. "'tf' `•,{k t, ,.*r t9 .. . . ,ki+ .•i,..f':. ,b ,,,•., ,} ?rr,:�+r•F^{.*�+�'� ,dv,•" re� ,,.�',..$' ?;\x r#r•-, .•,:.S.4x .�i'-%"1 ... FIXTURE SELECTOR GUIDE: The table below is a quick mounting height. Then, read down the columns for i reference approximator for fixture comparison and selection. comparison of initial average footcandle levels to wattage, To use the table, select the appropriate area width and source and spacing. i 2..r7,- •:k'�t''Z d'IW4e"'i -, AREA COVERAGE CWAFi1~l,' s . .I, `` ill ,:i i 1G:s 1 r, x..c s MOUNTING AREA LONGITUDINAL I AVERAGE �'y i HEIGHT WIDTH (pole sep.) INITIAL f pr E3 F SOURCE/WATTAGE , (ft.) ,., ,. (ft.) SPACING . FOOTtCANDLEtS1f`,t.'� 0 1 19 bh �" High 250+ 20' 40' 55' 4.35 • Pressure 400 30' 60' 90' 3.60 Sodium UII� 40' 80' 120' 5.65!;. ' . i:; Metal 400 30' 60' 90' 3.00 Halide 1000 40' 80' 120' 4.40 Mercury 400 30' 54' 90' 1.60 Vapor .1000 40' 72' 104' 2.40 Based on 30.000 lumen lamp.For standard lamp,multiply illumination levels by.94 , NOTE:This table is intended for approximation purposes and not to replace a precise lighting survey. i I y 58 • illii � _pr.., .:-^n .. - nr Ir:;,.: Y . ..'.. : ,.. .. :.,r,,. Y• vr. .a _ .c , a. , . , r.� VV /DOOR LIl.1if I IING • SHARP CUTOFF TAS SERIES �. • F l i1t., .,. ' .�� ttr i . 1I'',, .,S ' t ? ,0%}:sit a j.4 P.r'.. ,. 'v ar '."els, j43- 7,' r tF t e 4, t,'' ''Y - It" ' • 1w ` ' ' y Wf r ' t Y �S' � �' Q V 9 ui y�,+1'4�✓7 vstl') ] rr, /i. /: i ... S A`tr i i"dm� .}1 F 4,t}. n C •. i �1 t ! R.`�'y�, ' f 1 ,� r,,F'�t 5" {, �± r !•Isar* .(V.0.St k,.e •. . Ya! s , • '�, k�dtf �� f�*p�4 d "1� � F���.Js�� T��wf�..� � �'1' rP 'ti. 1i �,'.rtfh.�.# ��� •:i'., .1.. t r w f w i t � af t �'� y, t rS ) .?n e �yfi'S. ,.� }�r �� StY.1-. r t. .� t-.F ,f7'�t y v } tekytrf ��,� J�.{•y J T j.,.t f•{: t�, ,i t.b.' :t'ti VI t;y{}�u _ 1 i,,• :t tT,�1.'419,4',r ''"°1 1" ',...0 r4 j -" t i.g) F 4 t' I.7.% 'T,I; ,k t'�•i f it x' . 3+� 7111: , r", 7yj 5 sy,' 4•t1-k gr i. qy',`4 ya{,d( R Atilt r' • L Yti i Yy —i f T ` �„1' w i-h..;+ A.-a.' i,X.".1_44;t4A' N ,4.a-z4,,4,5 1. "":s7 r'„. MuSNr•:A.( .N I.'f,"�511 .. ��i a`, Y t'', Dimensions { Lamp type :_ Catalog Number" T`Voltage Ballast Weight Length Width Depth &Wattage (specify) Type Lbs.—Kg. In.—cm `' 'In.—em in.—cm � ; , r, High 250 •TAS 250SSP12 Auto. 24-10.91 24-60.96 191/z-49.53 91/z-24.13 Aic;` Pressure �00� TAS 400SSP12 120 Reg. 39-17.73 24-60.96 191/z-49.53 91/z-24.13 Sodium 1000 TAS 1000 S SP12 208 53-24.09 30-76.20 231/8-58.74 101/2-26.67 r', • :r Metal 400 TAS 400 M SP12 Peak 31-14.09 24-60.96 191/2-49.53 91/2-24,13 41'—'1 Halide 1000 TAS 1000 M SP12 07' Lead 47-21.36 30-76.20 231/8-58.74 101/2-26.67 Mercury • 480 ; 400 TAS 400 H SP12 ..7 CWA 30—13.64 24—60.96 191/2—49.53 91/2—246.173 {4 1000 TAS 1000 H S P12 45—20.45 30—76.20 231/8—58.74 101/z—26.67 _ ' �1 ';I '�0 —,P12 r `•w;ZYYr'h' ry�re,'`t 's .�""syr' ,+` Y ,r t' 7 i e• - " r� r .N.4'A, ^"`t• . ,• t,'r'a 4/tr)tsyr � , i {`yy,' 4�, 'f�h i mr„, `xv+-i :;Fw, ,tn r t .., 4 ,'10 }rl f ,, hr�.� i.,o`. ,if i 7 t'y '1nt -:,,„ ,,,,,,. t,..w.s;ll.�, },i s �,• q.yi,ri� it clb ` + f }t.'r l 0,,,,u�,,�0� R f 4i 1.SilaV'�f.. ' L".v t %t'a ., 'VI' -,ALA W L% e1:'"• ;�i'k" . ,?,L`,w ,� t~ i� 'vtffa � tf i a5't1r frd 61t1' dg;bi� kr ,�" •:' x { "r g . .,� ); ,: 4 fie. t ,i, d 'y, f ' r ft4. ri-,.. J_r •'t.151t+ '".r."ft�t T�f:. :4,,�]y'�i r:._�'r;f4'�1..Y," � •�•�1.4i+•. �17n Y�+sl r v''�} ;.''�, 'i-s'�� " i r�h k�''S-{ti,.,.�,'�'�.�x� ;r j��, �t'.' ,-_,-, ,)1;`.(�•ie , 4t".e.A.Voi >,.f1.,, 45 AO,15�d', 1.. `l.,-.,"rt, r, ?t``L"!T 4 'Lt(ylgTa= r't.; 51 S tte,r,. '.,,'^J.. `. "'t'„ f`(- ,M' .4,.�,.•-Wit. t , t: ', r^'4 1F.4 • er: !' t. 1~ M :,is"it•I' 4" I�` - "e '*, �`k W...'kc�, 7'.i".Y� ',,, el ttt It, "c-• k�,y��'(tE l,.••v.. 'f"S �r r, ; 5 �.,t+a,.i r ': Lj >• ,G�Sn, 7�r• 4• •*cN�7.,,r ..,rl ,itr � 41I`1 ?T iy `; }}"�i a �7"ei,1rt Om- rr'l�ptl. f C' ,�rfr S': 5 y?f$};4'���j'y,�w-'•�'r .:`ki C ': . .s ..f.,.4;,.-rr(:-.,tl, ,i!! "�f.•s '-f 7� ixp •xr . •a '.4,.;rs L+?r_ iV+:. ,�p,Sr�L 4+ r r, � "3^' .t .+f ,14w. •J .k ,! ,t �i:y,l'it' . t4,-iy ,- t-f✓ o1 - "J.4 rr,rt, L�f' -t,• t ✓i .., i,= .:, rt i s :,- Y r) ( 5j 'A 1- r i f tit q' t.,e I t ''', -,. ` �ii' ,,, v. 4 , ' :* tIt.•µ_ ^'"re �3, ,d z ' I `I `.;, r ; r' r r 7 . 't ;i1.1 , v, •*., t 'iv f r•4 r< ' t ; �' e` t$V T' •G•'r, y ..';ayf i 4!•-;,T' °1.'.:'VP• "f } . r a$4•10 +, �' • a r. ' '•? r L..e- mh t I.,."'�,,:;},! i- ! ] t�.0.0 y . '� E•t F..51,j1,.}[1�f. y ! I-.e ti >,ij� )1( „ S T fi ,Akt'rt.54,1 . • ', r. . 3 ♦ t ,a s],,.4 ' r'. re & 4 t 5j f "..T ,: h 7'r t,rl'i ,„ f :':470.fis-- 'r E 4 ' Y s ,•t °tlf'it r •>+ "+it t)4 qty.-I,:' , ', 4 a --•� 1 .n it r Y,•i r' e^ t t t7 rr , •14t!' T.l ':' Tgrr �V`,• `1 1•1 1, "} ;1't r. tr.nk 1.1.44'+' �i,' 1•"C .Vitecap d j't,+�;s�AWL„, -eii .,,k +J , > r'4,m1. ';", .,'r , L 0�' 4 �Y�� t�'`: }}� i F'R 1, fr' f. 7G ]'�" �" aR��,;,a 5�te A ,' ,�" ,.�if pp '"�i. �i^ �'" r ?t ' 1 v tY , rr -°r4i ,.,r4 ;^ . r ',' • .,..di,it x`,•••, tw• 1� 4 T '' µ.t'...wog � it y' i qt „ ,_i'' ' ' ,;, ,{ a,. ,,,'r t5 ,.a; r r r. "jpi :,.;^ ',-''..f.i.1'' 1,.,�i •y. ''j `. .� rpsif'`Att.'.k',➢,R�`i `•. k r'. p�73d9 1.p sf 1 f Y S o,Y i , F f 1s . 1r'tE'S't, . <ti.,. ^ w " ,Tx�a � t ", r ^r,t r ",,1 atT y t4,,,t V#'1 x,1'? x ,�i• .�'i:N•`4 r,N-7 r,i• 7�ta?1 ••-wi,, r. x 4. �r !} �[x55 +� `,"'k/ r,`, ''^:'�'g is �"'. '1 "2 ,,x " T.,,•„,„ .,, r„ fir. /t.t ,4 :fir `�C'•. rk�,“yy -'�c ogo, •Y 1T , 1. .0,,L, . f,$,''S yx�.t!;,1a,.„< . 't 1 Yt1 r ;i r .R el r ti. !a fit; rr� x y ?/ ",? -WWI' yJ: 3 Ada+ " i� v ' #i j .. F °4-. i'rw.c+ , I -. +r a. r r { �'4'4: ' "I�r+. u e� Y♦iiS;f 3 r r i, „,,..I L 1` Jj,r r. H' 1, J ff pp ii ..s, �"4, r.!r rf M1 i,K""f3], .,t. tIS.a ?•rr. 7' . 4 " ',y„lr tt� ,r f .r jrf y i i 'F��i wf�F �It:��� �i". ni t , ',�``�„Y'', i� ��• aL r,, s.,.0,.,.„..�,,, '�.q���d� i) '"'. •r, + 34y, '�. ! a 1.x4f; O l` {r.'. b ,rt1 ^ttr 1 .f ` k' t ['+V a Ir i 4 J; ,,, y p�.N f d i t:^ f 5n e.t 4' i � ✓�fi; .L.^�'''r `'•.. .,rYh k'���fit�^< ° � �7v�r,Y }S•7 � � r,•4 .' .r, r x,^ `i'. P „I f VI�7� fx �'� n '�. N„ �,.� T .,xt �; �Ifn;.'f ! + t r C . `i: t• -3 , ! n � a.s i of w.� tf , ,yF v M { r t U �y� . ,� yet rlt. f ti �y,ji���, ;,}}f,i y �?' ��gg Y u n. y4r<.:. :.M>r kit ti;h i,e1 sa .4„ t t. '-Y„l'� a,kor-,4:q' ,� •E1 Ff L;� 14.,.. { ,. . i T T i. ri'Fr•S rv. 'MFa1 +l� s t4 ;•`n.t " x '4.1 1'4 4 �" t•w� r<tLrb .i( ',�"?''~er 8 y w};}d�i�, a 'i'tTaq^F•{?tj?:`' ''� 4'l e ' i •"d t i +i. r rf �{.k r t at k ,y� „yI i' x r+ . C i n �. •.' ' p , ty F� ,'?z a }q)1 l N„ µ '§M ;f .(0 r }}1,, � U • '�i�.7 %'-e t c Y :tri e4.4 ,j a• 7f • •f • k.' •i 't• a .,�'s 't.)4', Y-. .C.7y,r'1x nt. 7 t% .,,I.,1'..>3y �4;ktrILV,, xOSs xf )44.- ,45,40�i}`'!.+Y;,t>y' � ', 'lifti'1�.-kiL,103'; � y"` y. .''' .!'Att , 4, 4 i!rif ••cr s? Y '4,4 {i, a. ••• b- •;, 4.!., s4,d �•et, T trY•' 11.4i}J-f,CI3 ! h Si, yr 1 x 1? f ' �4r ,t 'a�1 . x s f r,t } ;1 r L tpi tsfi r rl, � ;, L. "r°� ✓k;xL `�a t �:r ,�? k M, a ,: wr r ! " r' !e i{ `t its o-4 r e 3akro . ,: q�.�sn s� yf^i, '� i e � „S�i•'^L' G , , ri1 , x -.': o !,.71., .4 " }t`ic,,,s *,r ,,,l ;L,. i ,,>` ',;l �'7.,•,pi,,.,`f[m y, 'c ,", 7 S �,;:i;.. .• y ~i , �. J" r, t�. Y *� 1.. ??" ',,� a � p:•, 1�i1� "F. T,'l frt�•`�" ,,�'t.:.,r �c i .}I � �: to 4 t.'-i ,to.:tf a. " f.. , .7r%.. fi• . r' 4-:,., ,-,-.. :. 3 :• 'j "'=s'•C .y, i '71 �F?•v.fj'ti��•'" �k `�!��`+"�'. ?•y.. ., . f. •x. ' d �` : hE v•g- :'��.,, �,_n..; r�'Shy !.r #„?�u`'�'•�. :� •V;.; e., ... � :•.i � .,. : .. OPTIONS SUFFIX. CAT.NO. DESCRIPTION WITH: . • T W —PER/PE NEMATwist-Lock PE Receptacle / &Photocontrol for 120,208,240V L T —PER/PE4 NEMATwist-Lock PE Receptacle / p5 &Photocontrol for 480V .L -1 —PER/PE7 NEMATwist-Lock PE Receptacle &Photocontrol for 277V —PER NEMA Twist-Lock PE Receptacle only. No Photocontrol - —TB Multi-Tap Ballast(120,208,240,277V) —DC Decorator Color Specify(See Inside Back Cover) —MA Mast Arm Adaptor° • —DA12P Degree Arm for Pole" —DA12W Degree Arm for Wall" 1' *To order replace SP1 2 designation in the catalog number with the • t• desired optional mounting designation. NOTE:For more details,see outdoor option pages. • 1v11N�e..1� .� 59 ' i• • ... ... ,.........=,: ". ------- 1 ISTAT I ST IG.S ' . . ,.......1.' — -- --. _ _ _ ' I ' tr..5'47t4 c‘-ri'...t-,'"1... ds,•......1-1.C. 'r>1_1•-e...-le.,A5g...., 420,14•<••145 2.64 a c. Gifet•SEIK,..•kg.,,,,..... - - - - - - - - - --- / S,7....•74, i - - 4 PI ' •q,' ,.. ,-) C__. 0...AK.,1..L•07,&7&7.) etT/e...••46.•WA ..."' •Z S 4 ,;., I 7 7 . &•7 1 - e z • --II 11-'--- 1 / d . —.,._2.— — / • . . .• o. 1 -‘-p',------..•-2H,..—,—.-, a,,,,.,) 1 `P / 4.•"`'`'.•'"..`"•••' B_ '•. ..• -,--...,....... :,,, ..,.fr-.s.e...i1iIII .1.....1 - , ,:__J 1 . 1-11-- -11--1 , b i ! • • A . __ --,4 1 ... ....; ..., r • i . • ' \\ X::', . —..• , - ' . - . . • • - . . 1 - ' iy.9 - .„ . . .. . . - . 11.„ . • 1 .,. , :, ti • .,,e 1 . > r ,•( . . . . _ ..... , . .. • a ,.. . 1 '•., ,• : 1 4,_-, . . '''''. &I.'1. •-• -J . - .,7•771:f" '''''''' 7.. — ‘-'. 1 : . . ,- I ,, _.'. '• • •••' •• •I ' . Z. . ' '•. _ . .—..— . ..,. '''1'.•••'4'/i''l ___.•_:, i__..,..___.. . . ...-•• V . ‘.... , ‘,_„11.•., .." 1- • '--1 3 . • • • 'IA) \\ •tir;L::: ey' C .. . . • I , - . . . : • \\\\ ., ',•!. \ •.: ., , .. .'.......7.7.: I .- Iv • :S . , 1--FL, &I` •. . . .... . .• . . 1 . . . . .. . . 7. . I . • ., . . . ''....... p li A <— A.,.,w,•••,..t-,.•••••—) • •,- . • 564 4. . 1.. •.:•:, • ..n ,3•- ,..ri_i--2--- • .-r— ,' g NA"Fl ; '. ._. ,.. .. .? , ‹. ----....,..S.e.1.1&05,,,,,.. e-rx..) . :I rl.::... ei • - ----7---•—_______::.-----01-• , . _ • • .L-J• 2,11•••• •;7Mal" --_----------- . , . . . . . ... . . . • •,• . 1-r E. rt--..4••••••-.1 • ' . . . . . . . , . . . • EVERGREEN •�y;acr'gav s ri xr iia aU';; �A,<' f•�•,•`=:,F'K n 'a°!84', TREE STAKING DETAIL TREE STAKING DETAIL ::l.1;;' .r..�_.. :e•••i,,_gee i!i a i itt&:.a3':rii o.kssI'.,.•.1S:et..:•; IXM «>:$:w tl) ). 4 .:to'yl1 a es Sir► � ,1r • • r. .vec' e' •$ "` r .xLrv$o 'i,17K'"Vi •'1. ` I'9� o^-:.s - )�\`\` M4u'.YG5 /v B...CW 91c.•L .c41i(P _ !, Al a-o.N.>i d l ..IIIanca-ya� 'f:'-'�i i ✓i�� • /v Ee c.c% G, .asp. 4 /.!� ra r: ,arm Ir ��T-- •:•,.7�1 ��/4,r iV. 1.. „m 61;4 tt ��, \d 1B' 1. 'e a L :zoev9r s i It. 9EL(Ai�LYLW✓ 9 n I 1 �� rGta vo erre4rn4rU+�v use7.:e+. 4 !# 1 J: ' • -y. V 9Aax4vP;A;O;N6t,/ �� :- �7�i,�i race .irsnmce r `i� fi�'J �i , '4V.p r w►i�� p��I�bt;' '� _ SHRUB PLANTING DETAIL f 3 — 'f. 11�1p A' 11 G�++ 9 � 3 3---�I.G) y ;'... —sro e/v,-,,cr,n9 aPDNIG �li s '1 in 411) a? rvs'r r• vxc9R i-� E * ,,ii fiii' sce O/RTr 1� s T o ip r 11. l p. 4 • dl: ! I -1?)---- .— �� 8I I GENERAL NOTES • . Vf L Iti) � � v. 1 MI_401, V Ge%/ 1.2S?uNL ��a -N .IC.�Y«/EF✓�L _ (,'4 / ` \I vLII�I �����. �� 4I ` 3 4'L?!'il T'�../N/1[L P.IN.'/.2:/.aSP.:' J 2'Z29,,4.1-v,,Ma.LS'/NALL P../.N/NG.CEOe, ,.._,......,....:...,„....z.-.E.:,-..7. 4 A! l'UWr.fAr... .6.WO 4..../naEti 5-e, �E 1 \I{I/ .�,y.J1 I. ., .'. � &/AGP/...5/'7"57 ti 5'Y1 CR✓x.", SYiX.PS¢7 • I �(�i{1IF/\; I[u,i::. � q Z�'ul M%�.'�c"�i��.'v`v��r.3/�l.'�.v/.__ . r \ i , Ili.1�'iea. l ,,.��y(,��y).[y..]�y %, t_. -+"- .".f'_I4S . 4' F4,44.4+9i_Y.PiD.v A(45.�4Y1i1V. N -3 - \�II .,e oz. ,94LN.e...s4 414V W21 S E/ -vL LANC, & C. . . 4N $. !gip w • ^j �% C it � .�. r AD Ask a01� ccn+atv .�e 3yQ; . ' M •• • •' P...:..,,,KLa/.c✓../424 i./r C r ., 4,26'444 64'RL. W a 8 / �` ,C .a/e.v46%vro a'ivaer'/m er. 2>'c..L, U' B •�..�. ® +, �>�- �7,j�,.a�,o _ H ,1;vve orzLeips,,QY/.A'..S A.O//.4'+•.,,.r2LlPWCea4, a6'ai® y 02.99®'Q le t in tt Q 0.og! PLcwr%v.c A/aar c>ar7o GRIvG/zUn a".V../uc. le<asi o A .r..i Iv". • i6n1{'A 1',' _�..� rron.M PR^9eai ce MBurU4 lF✓Gm q.K. +n'HN. _ S,W.d9J 97i4E2/, Qb Rti134,6“5•¢JN ✓..a/Gr/e9 !,,,6444 >, .5 a/✓Y✓A",,,raa N.✓ '/1/.'. /U/GK A' 9 s9'OG. Z • ` V/\V SITE PLAN .=n uV.w rNo w Nom a ' KIA� L_ u (P r{f // G/�Jin-ieDi ST'.O.s,T6$1p S • 1 � .Le. . ...u.l. .',rc�'Gcw.T�.•+e.e . . f , • _ • • • > f • Y IS • E.4sT mLE V/>T I011• • is s — ' • - I • a• a a } I - u ' if.I__ —-- ��—— i— — WEST ELEVA.T I0rl % 0 i • ILv % cm i L1 GE • • ill A' — RTI—I ELEVATIoF`L `O L.41 . . .. 1 H RH HI'jl IN 1 Hi 1111 11:71,. \ , \ \\ \ ) , ) (.." ) L___ • •--- \ _---D ' . 1 ... I , - . A . , s. $ _ „,, • • • . • . . . • • . . 0 _ 0...,- _ _ • . • . . • . • I : •. I :.. _ _7. _•._ _. • .. _ ... . • _ I .1. • • . . : : ,, . , ... .. --'— . _) . , ,. •I't is I i'•.; ,a -.- • ( -) ( ,, ) (---: t ( , — - — s• ,; ; — ' • ,..• • , 1 I ,• — -1----- z 2 1 il 1 I ec 2 _• • . 0. E . . 2 %t' _•._11 -V. 2 I. • • .0 g 1\xl L ) > 0 E, \ , [ f...,...-..,, CC • I I L__, — (..) 't — -''—' L - • i 1.,H.I., ..H...: U.I c - ';• ) .-- .—4. UJ .. __ _ ( f' ) ( i — -____ t'6 .7 cc 1.1.1 • F. 0 —- r-- m __ -,._-_-,. _ , • !.:- ,-- ( ---- - r.,/° • .:. I _ _ I il. 0 1 • + . ' , I A 5 • ---T..;?' • .__i — 5 .— - ' e,-c••,,,:•• I r'..., I g g,.. - r- _ —It r-- _ _ --1 -', ,I.,. - .,. 1 it ir,1 I': LE6m.,— Dec.r.:P1-1.•,,., — 1 I Ai_L_Li_l 1 "._—_Th ( —••• ) . " 1 I 1 I 11, 1 1, '1+HZ' '.• ) t '••• --`4•-'• ' ',. t .• J • • I t ...,:.: t-IF 1-01.2 .,..a..o,...m p-.rt.,oF - • oce.......,•.5, C.,.37L,L.,..1.,/,.aria.JK.CCO p.m=cc•-rton...,0.4 1,-.0 12..00.6.....0,.,4, 11 -7 't 6,r...-•,,,a rt" III riot?.-,..:z:r'''•''"''''''`.) '41-=';',.'•:.,:tr::::•;-:'-'-.2.1' ,: ---— •••• ! ' ,.. I I I 1 1 ! I:. .. I 1 1 1 ' 1 ': .`1-11-1` 1 1 I 1€,I 1'1 • • ••1:1 I I I n .. •• .. x-ve.,.I ,I......I ..,...,,..__,.....,..,,.I I I 4( h.FJ. 31, 31-1,..5.7 0 Ai..