Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutECF_SEPA Checklist_180516.pdf1 P:\2017\17-045 DCT Monster Road\Agency & Code\Submittals\20180521_Demo SEPA\SAVE\17-045 DEMO SEPA-Application COR_20180521 Final.doc Rev: 08/2016 ENV ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Planning Division 1055 South Grady Way-Renton, WA 98057 Phone: 425-430-7200 | www.rentonwa.gov PURPOSE OF CHECKLIST: Governmental agencies use this checklist to help determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant. This information is also helpful to determine if available avoidance, minimization or compensatory mitigation measures will address the probable significant impacts or if an environmental impact statement will be prepared to further analyze the proposal. INSTRUCTIONS FOR APPLICANTS: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Please answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. You may need to consult with an agency specialist or private consultant for some questions. You may use “not applicable” or "does not apply" only when you can explain why it does not apply and not when the answer is unknown. You may also attach or incorporate by reference additional studies reports. Complete and accurate answers to these questions often avoid delays with the SEPA process as well as later in the decision-making process. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. INSTRUCTIONS FOR LEAD AGENCIES: Additional information may be necessary to evaluate the existing environment, all interrelated aspects of the proposal and an analysis of adverse impacts. The checklist is considered the first but not necessarily the only source of information needed to make an adequate threshold determination. Once a threshold determination is made, the lead agency is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of the checklist and other supporting documents. USE OF CHECKLIST FOR NONPROJECT PROPOSALS: For nonproject proposals (such as ordinances, regulations, plans and programs), complete the applicable parts of sections A and B plus the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D). Please completely answer all questions that apply and note that the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proponent," and "affected geographic 2 P:\2017\17-045 DCT Monster Road\Agency & Code\Submittals\20180521_Demo SEPA\SAVE\17-045 DEMO SEPA-Application COR_20180521 Final.doc Rev: 08/2016 area," respectively. The lead agency may exclude (for non-projects) questions in Part B - Environmental Elements –that do not contribute meaningfully to the analysis of the proposal. A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: 601 Monster Road SW 2. Name of applicant: INNOVA Architects Inc. for DCT Monster Road, LLC 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Brian Ludwig, INNOVA Architects, Inc. 950 Pacific Avenue, Ste 450, Tacoma, WA 98402 253-572-4903 4. Date checklist prepared: May 16, 2018 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Renton 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): This phase of the overall project; building demolition, is anticipated to begin spring 2018 and last approximately 8 weeks. The overall site development and building construction is expected to begin after demolition for completion late 2018 or early 2019. 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. The next phase of the project will be overall site development and building construction, which is currently under land-use review. Future tenant improvements will occur in this speculative warehouse shell under separate permit. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. A SEPA Checklist for site development and building construction, Soils Report, Geotechnical Report, SWPPP, TESC and a Remedial Action Work Plan. 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. A Land Use application has been submitted to the City of Renton; no other governmental approvals are known to be pending. 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. 3 P:\2017\17-045 DCT Monster Road\Agency & Code\Submittals\20180521_Demo SEPA\SAVE\17-045 DEMO SEPA-Application COR_20180521 Final.doc Rev: 08/2016 • SEPA Checklist-City of Renton • Demolition Permit 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. (Lead agencies may modify this form to include additional specific information on project description.) The existing developed property is a 9.61 acre industrial parcel (242304-9008) with an existing concrete tilt-up warehouse building erected in the 1950’s that was most recently used by Graphic Packaging. The development phase under this SEPA is to demolish in entirety the existing 143,862 SF warehouse building and a 1,500 SF small shop building and 1,400 SF roof structure behind the main building. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. The project is located at 601 Monster Road CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON: A Portion of the N.W. 1/4 AND THE N.W. 1/4 OF SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 23, RANGE 4 E., W.M. Legal Descriptions: A.P.N. 2422304-9008-04 LOT “B-L” OF THE SID ELAND/JEFFERSON SMURFIT LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT NO. LUA-98- I48-LLA OF THE CITY OF RENTON, AS RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 9812309028. RECORDS OF KING COUNTY AUDITOR; EXCEPT THAT PORTION, IF ANY, CONVEYED TO THE CITY OF RENTON FOR OAKESDALE BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 8706091481 SITUATE IN THE CITY OF RENTON, COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON. TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. EARTH a. General description of the site: EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY 4 P:\2017\17-045 DCT Monster Road\Agency & Code\Submittals\20180521_Demo SEPA\SAVE\17-045 DEMO SEPA-Application COR_20180521 Final.doc Rev: 08/2016 (check or circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other _____________ b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? A majority of the site is relatively flat but sits lower than the adjacent south parcel and right- of-way to the east. Adjacent property grades fall onto the project site from slight slopes to as great as 40%. No development is proposed within these steep slope areas. c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any agricultural land of long-term commercial significance and whether the proposal results in removing any of these soils. Please refer to geotechnical report included in this submittal. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. To our knowledge, there is no history of unstable soils although the city has mapped the south property line as sensitive and protected slopes. These slopes are heavily vegetated which will remain as there is no development of these areas proposed. d. Describe the purpose, type, total area, and approximate quantities and total affected area of any filling, excavation, and grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. No excavation or filling is expected for this phase of the project. e. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. Yes, erosion could occur due to the building demolition from concentrated stormwater leaving the site. However, the implementation of a temporary sediment and erosion control plan using Best Management Practices should mitigate impact. f. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? Under existing conditions there is about 60% of the site covered with impervious surfaces inclusive of the existing building; this would be the same after this phase of the project. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: The proposal will follow storm water management design criteria required by the City of Renton and erosion and sediment control plans will be developed in accordance with 5 P:\2017\17-045 DCT Monster Road\Agency & Code\Submittals\20180521_Demo SEPA\SAVE\17-045 DEMO SEPA-Application COR_20180521 Final.doc Rev: 08/2016 standards referenced by City of Renton. These measures include catch basin protection, silt fencing, construction access and temporary runoff collection. 2. AIR a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, and industrial wood smoke) during construction, operation, and maintenance when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Demolition and construction activities could cause dust at the site. Construction vehicles and equipment may cause exhaust emissions. Efforts will be made to regulate emissions to the air. After the project is complete, air quality will return to previous condition. Are there any off–site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. To our knowledge, there are no offsite sources of emissions or odors that will affect the proposal. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: The contractor will follow Best Management Practices during demolition of the proposed project. Vehicles not in use will be shut off and materials stored on site will be enclosed or covered when not in use. 3. WATER a. Surface Water: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. There is an existing “Regional Detention Facility Pump Station pond” which is approximately 220-feet to the west of the subject building to be demolished. 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. No. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. Does not apply. 6 P:\2017\17-045 DCT Monster Road\Agency & Code\Submittals\20180521_Demo SEPA\SAVE\17-045 DEMO SEPA-Application COR_20180521 Final.doc Rev: 08/2016 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. None. 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. No, the project is not within the 100-year floodplain. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No discharge of waste material to surface water is expected. b. Ground Water: 1) Will groundwater be withdrawn from a well for drinking water or other purposes? If so, give a general description of the well, proposed uses and approximate quantities withdrawn from the well. Will water be discharged to groundwater? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No groundwater will be withdrawn from a well for drinking water or other purposes. No water will be discharged into the ground water. 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals. . . ; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. No waste material will be discharged into the ground. The site is connected to an existing sanitary sewer in the roadway at the north-northwest of the site. This sanitary service will be capped prior to demolition of the building. c. Water runoff (including stormwater): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. Generally stormwater runoff will be created after the roof is removed exposing the existing concrete floor areas. The existing catch basins around the site which collect the majority of the site’s stormwater will continue to be used with catch basin filters installed in them. Silt 7 P:\2017\17-045 DCT Monster Road\Agency & Code\Submittals\20180521_Demo SEPA\SAVE\17-045 DEMO SEPA-Application COR_20180521 Final.doc Rev: 08/2016 fencing will be installed along the west side of the site (low side) to manage stormwater along this side of the site. An on-site CESCL manager will monitor the stormwater facilities and add other systems based on conditions. All released stormwater will be conveyed directly to the existing “Regional Detention Facility Pump Station” which is where the current stormwater is flowing to. Any stormwater management system will be prepared per City of Renton requirements. 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. No waste material is expected to enter the ground or surface waters. 3) Does the proposal alter or otherwise affect drainage patterns in the vicinity of the site? If so, describe. No d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water, and drainage pattern impacts, if any: This proposal does not change the existing drainage patterns. The previously noted proposed measures are for the management of water quality. The proposal will be to continue to use the existing Regional Detention Facility Pump Station, which manages stormwater quantity for this and the surrounding properties. The site is underlain by fill material which eliminates infiltration on this site. 4. PLANTS a. Check the types of vegetation found on the site: deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other shrubs grass pasture crop or grain wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? No vegetation is expected to be removed during this phase of the project. c. List threatened and endangered species known to be on or near the site. 8 P:\2017\17-045 DCT Monster Road\Agency & Code\Submittals\20180521_Demo SEPA\SAVE\17-045 DEMO SEPA-Application COR_20180521 Final.doc Rev: 08/2016 There are no threatened or endangered species on or near the site, to our knowledge. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: No landscaping is proposed for this phase of the project. e. List all noxious weeds and invasive species known to be on or near the site. No known noxious or invasive plant species are known on or near this site. 5. ANIMALS a. List any birds and other animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site. Examples include: birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other: mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: skunk, opossum, squirrel, fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: b. List any threatened and endangered species known to be on or near the site. To our knowledge, there are no threatened or endangered species on our site. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. Yes, it is part of the Pacific Flyway for migratory birds. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: There are no proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife under this proposal. e. List any invasive animal species known to be on or near the site. To our knowledge, there no invasive animal species known to be on or near the side. 6. ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. 9 P:\2017\17-045 DCT Monster Road\Agency & Code\Submittals\20180521_Demo SEPA\SAVE\17-045 DEMO SEPA-Application COR_20180521 Final.doc Rev: 08/2016 In the future both natural gas and electricity will be used to meet the future building’s energy needs. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: No energy conservation features are proposed for this phase of the project. 7. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. The demolition of the existing buildings under this phase of the project could include exposure to toxic chemicals risk of fire and spills or hazardous waste. Prior to demolition; the building will be inspected and any hazardous materials will be removed per a remediation plan. 1) Describe any known or possible contamination at the site from present or past uses. The site has been assigned Cleanup Site ID 11481 by the Department of Ecology for limited areas of soil and groundwater contamination from a former oil water separator and former waste collection vaults located west of the existing building. The subgrade features have been removed, contaminated soil was excavated and transported off-site for disposal in 1993 and 2015, and groundwater monitoring was begun in the 1990s. An additional area of soil and groundwater contamination was identified and delineated on the north side of the building in 2017. Following this proposed building demolition phase and during the site development and building construction phase, decommissioning of an existing monitoring well, soil and groundwater in this area will be removed and transported offsite for disposal. 2) Describe existing hazardous chemicals/conditions that might affect project development and design. This includes underground hazardous liquid and gas transmission pipelines located within the project area and in the vicinity. See noted 7.1 and 7.2 above. 3) Describe any toxic or hazardous chemicals that might be stored, used, or produced during the project's development or construction, or at any time during the operating life of the project. 10 P:\2017\17-045 DCT Monster Road\Agency & Code\Submittals\20180521_Demo SEPA\SAVE\17-045 DEMO SEPA-Application COR_20180521 Final.doc Rev: 08/2016 There are no known toxic or hazardous chemicals that might be stored, used, or produced during this phase of the project or during the project's development or construction, or at any time during the operating life of the project. 4) Describe special emergency services that might be required. No special emergency services will be required other than police and fire protection that already exists. 5) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: Potential exposures from inhalation or ingestion of toxic chemicals in soil or groundwater during demolition are highly preventable and will be managed using a site-specific health and safety plan, personal protective equipment, and other measures as appropriate. All remediation work will be performed by HAZWOPER-certified contractors. Risk of potential spill of contaminated soil or groundwater will be managed using standard spill prevention and countermeasure procedures, including on-site spill response kits. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? There is light traffic noise from nearby Interstate 5 and State Route 405 and a rock recycling facility but none of these should be of adverse effect the proposed project. 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. In the Short term, demolition noises will affect the area during the daytime hours from 7am- 7pm. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: The proposed measures to reduce or control the noise impacts will be to limit the hours of operation during the demolition and all phases of the project. The site is located in an Industrial area and in no proximity to a residential neighborhood. Existing adjacent freeway traffic and facility operations create significantly more noise than this site will produce. 8. LAND AND SHORELINE USE a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Will the proposal affect current land uses on nearby or adjacent properties? If so, describe. 11 P:\2017\17-045 DCT Monster Road\Agency & Code\Submittals\20180521_Demo SEPA\SAVE\17-045 DEMO SEPA-Application COR_20180521 Final.doc Rev: 08/2016 The current zoning of the project site and adjacent parcels is IM, Industrial Medium. Property to the east opposite side of the right-of way is Industrial Heavy. The current use of this site and adjacent properties are industrial buildings and operations consistent with the zoning. b. Has the project site been used as working farmlands or working forest lands? If so, describe. How much agricultural or forest land of long-term commercial significance will be converted to other uses as a result of the proposal, if any? If resource lands have not been designated, how many acres in farmland or forest land tax status will be converted to nonfarm or non-forest use? The site was reportedly been used as agricultural land for unknown crops until the late 1950s, when it was developed into the folding carton manufacturing facility that is currently at the site. No agricultural lands will be converted to other uses as a result of this proposal. Will the proposal affect or be affected by surrounding working farm or forest land normal business operations, such as oversize equipment access, the application of pesticides, tilling, and harvesting? If so, how: The proposed project will be of no impact. c. Describe any structures on the site. The site is currently developed with a 143,862 SF warehouse building, constructed in the 1950’s, that was most recently used by Graphic Packaging. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? Yes, the entire existing warehouse and a small outbuilding. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? The current zoning is IM, Industrial Medium. f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? The current Comprehensive Plan designation is Employment Area g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? The Shoreline Master program is not applicable to the site. h. Has any part of the site been classified as a critical area by the city or county? If so, specify. 12 P:\2017\17-045 DCT Monster Road\Agency & Code\Submittals\20180521_Demo SEPA\SAVE\17-045 DEMO SEPA-Application COR_20180521 Final.doc Rev: 08/2016 The site is currently mapped by the City of Renton as having sensitive and protected slopes and a moderate coal mine hazard. The proposed project is not proposing development within these areas. There is a low area that is part of the “Regional Detention Facility Pump Station” that lies approximately 220’ to the west of the subject property i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? This phase of effort is limited to demolition of the existing buildings. The future phase development of site and building will employ an unknown number of staff as much of the building is to be for speculative lease. j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? Since the property is vacant, the project would not displace anyone. k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: No measures are being proposed since no one is being displaced. l. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: The proposed project is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and the IM, Industrial Medium zoning. m. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts to agricultural and forest lands of long- term commercial significance, if any: Not applicable. 9. HOUSING a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. None b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: 13 P:\2017\17-045 DCT Monster Road\Agency & Code\Submittals\20180521_Demo SEPA\SAVE\17-045 DEMO SEPA-Application COR_20180521 Final.doc Rev: 08/2016 None 10. AESTHETICS a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? The tallest height of the future building is approximately 38 feet. The principal exterior building materials consist of painted concrete, glass, steel canopies and metal fascia coping. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? No immediate views will be altered or obstructed. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: None required. 11. LIGHT AND GLARE a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? The future project will have light fixtures mounted to the building face and at the underside of entry canopies. Parking areas away from the building may have pole mounted lights. All fixtures will be photocell operated, be fitted with cut-off shields and be Dark-Sky compliant. Vehicle headlights will be buffered by perimeter landscape screening. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No. c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? Street lighting along Monster Road SW is the only sources of light or glare that exist and affect our proposal. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: There are no proposed measures under this phase of the project. 12. RECREATION a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? 14 P:\2017\17-045 DCT Monster Road\Agency & Code\Submittals\20180521_Demo SEPA\SAVE\17-045 DEMO SEPA-Application COR_20180521 Final.doc Rev: 08/2016 Existing right-of-way improvements have implemented a bike lane along the Monster Road corridor. This bike lane and connecting lanes/sidewalks tie into the city’s Renton Trails and Bikeways system. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No, the proposed project will not displace any existing recreational uses. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: No measures are proposed to reduce or control impacts on recreational opportunities for this phase of the project. 13. HISTORIC AND CULTURAL PRESERVATION a. Are there any buildings, structures, or sites, located on or near the site that are over 45 years old listed in or eligible for listing in national, state, or local preservation registers ? If so, specifically describe. To our knowledge, there are no places or objects listed on or proposed for national, state or local preservation registers on or next to the site. b. Are there any landmarks, features, or other evidence of Indian or historic use or occupation? This may include human burials or old cemeteries. Are there any material evidence, artifacts, or areas of cultural importance on or near the site? Please list any professional studies conducted at the site to identify such resources. To our knowledge, no landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific or cultural importance exists on or near site. c. Describe the methods used to assess the potential impacts to cultural and historic resources on or near the project site. Examples include consultation with tribes and the department of archeology and historic preservation, archaeological surveys, historic maps, GIS data, etc. No measures are proposed to reduce impacts under this phase of the project. If a cultural or archaeological landmark is found, the Washington State Archeology and Historic Preservation Office will be notified. d. Proposed measures to avoid, minimize, or compensate for loss, changes to, and disturbance to resources. Please include plans for the above and any permits that may be required. No measures are proposed under this phase of the project 15 P:\2017\17-045 DCT Monster Road\Agency & Code\Submittals\20180521_Demo SEPA\SAVE\17-045 DEMO SEPA-Application COR_20180521 Final.doc Rev: 08/2016 14. TRANSPORTATION a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site or affected geographic area and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. The site is currently accessed by Monster Road SW. Primary access is anticipated to be from State Route 405, State Route 167 to multiple surface streets that then access the site including Oakesdale Avenue SW and Grady Way. See the attached Site Plan and Vicinity Map. b. Is the site or affected geographic area currently served by public transit? If so, generally describe. If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? The site is not currently served by Public Transportation. c. How many additional parking spaces would the completed project or non-project proposal have? How many would the project or proposal eliminate? There are no changes proposed under this phase of the project. d. Will the proposal require any new or improvements to existing roads, streets, pedestrian, bicycle or state transportation facilities, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). There are no changes proposed under this phase of the project. e. Will the project or proposal use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. The project will not use water or air transportation under this phase of the project f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project or proposal? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur and what percentage of the volume would be trucks (such as commercial and non-passenger vehicles). What data or transportation models were used to make these estimates? The traffic anticipated under this phase of the project will be related to the demolition of the building which should have minimal impact on traffic. The demolition contractor estimates 90- 100 haul trips occurring over a duration of 6 to 8 weeks, Monday through Friday with tentative Saturday work days, hours of work limited from 7am to 5pm. Haul route for general demolition debris via Monster Road SW to Oaksdale Ave SWW, Oaksdale Ave SW to Grady Way to I-405. Haul route for concrete debris shall be via Monster Road SW to Renton Concrete Recyling just 1/4 mile north of the subject property. 18 P:\2017\17-045 DCT Monster Road\Agency & Code\Submittals\20180521_Demo SEPA\SAVE\17-045 DEMO SEPA-Application COR_20180521 Final.doc Rev: 08/2016 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment.