Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLUA85-105 //,,e7._____,,.—...../ .,,,sN,NN. .____,,,,. Ncnaepime and � '� j Leeson e-eewY Norlhweel Inc . VALLEY 405 BUSINESS PARK t . Rorce A.Berp.ALA..pws,den{ lid v!ne Slreel(Second S vine) .' Sean*.wash 96121(20E)624-5771 i First City Equities / / Renton, Washington (-.:3 iiR! '_ ier i SITE PLAN o 100 2()0 300 i e S:44* ,------ ' % \, esda�e -- � `4 Oetl‘-.-- - Tract " 8 " .k __ _Y Avenue S.lt . ''\ . , I 1 PRASE \ Via_ _ _ ._ 1 ; ii -Proposed Parking ` I ExtensionV a - E — --> 1 Q. Puget _ - - - — � ' 0. Sub-Station Power �--- - -� I _�.� .,, 3 � _ -} � PHASE 1 I 4 1U 1 ig:. -1__. 1 PHASE 2 . Power Avenue S.W. �_ � IHI � I\TO. -� En NO ti...5- -ion-- k-s ' c -\ \ . ^ • . , ,,, y.. WITEI THAT PORTION OP LOT 12.SAID IiI.S.NuTON TECHNICAL CENIVI.DESCHIPEO • AS L.2.CITY OP RENTON LOT LINE NOTOSTNENT NO. L.L.A. 004-01. PILED • • see:xox oe,xsa a,mx°.°se=«arox rzCHNxev.axxea°Es«:ssx"s roxw.s. Uo T E:aaF-'. J'J mF doi -ES a`ere wri" ..-no4 - Fw cT,14$erJ vJ"�° x°xxa 1 U x, evsTiO LOT LINE MOMENT NO.L.L.A. us>Eux10,Te�"cexxe°iixr eeex m eaiexiac. " FITOKaF nas eIGFCY4�SE"4. FOTCFE E EEEF >L on,II .pe6.G r.loT 6-YC560 6cc6G4 L ��LEGAL DESCRIPTION e.s I I �[ 61 Parkin Stalls NEW PROPERTY LINE/LOT ADJUSTMENT I I - I I Lil. g i.�-_��- - N t'1a'2a•E - ��-��_-, 42b' n��I W : �!e 1 ,'�.. rye= "n,rmo t�H) .__-- I I L. �J_U I I • v+ Z 347.81' N1°1a:�8'E I 1 + -- -� rT r (n O • Party lnt Ex enslzn hose '� t 4 14 '- Paiking Extension (Phase I) Ic W Cl) - =,...--•CAA,.t 2. r . •,,,:„„ .,T.../E4mr--, CO Cn3't,,,,„ 11 .3 - (z-1T•23- -°r, - `.--11,1 --1.-,. .�a-- =L'ta— €--__ x�e.o�- ,• X o, M\ -,— esta Har / isft dt' _ -- --�-.��fa•ze•E--zae-.lM'-- W 11 s r a r N` `_ - —EXISTING PROPERTY.LINE -veW two' •- �� _ Y/ cc g W \ c I �� . • a .lol lol +ro>�T Exlsting,Bulldmg.)• a\\,� Q,CI `I E E...T O Faa.c�J° I ) W 3 • ✓J � o r, \7 ,� UTILITY GnScr'grli}J Ir r 1 \/ • ' • \\ Existing Bwldm9 ..ExIsUn9 Building' I a,,, +1 B2 l 3 Story Office Building \• se ..b . — a v N , a wa ',”"r I a Si9>.> r A i ( / \ I I xoDESCRIPTION\ DESCRIPTION Phase I I )l-Existing Phase 1 rm v�� DATE -" �:I"e 1 n • /' POWELL AVENUE S.W. . \ _ _ _ W6 C _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ rwaccr"na. . aos m.:=a _ini gn � NY f mma. •wo'�e. ��m.ln.Suite nzo vvn.•R"=1•a NA;104 (z el'a.-szz O �.: �i- N • arcxzTEn. iii"vier fee ei'''"n, :.. / .I'^.\,'.y SIFE. Lt. 7 s. °.n .v xN°sC.rE zveNnTEer. ion"Mitchell Nelsonrou a-. 11 ,vo°tseiiizu nn MI Stalls CIVIL MIER: .SITE APEA• \ nT \�®!y -p i.e.i w..re r iz°`ei'.8se.a "°�!_ lf®�fiC 1. :u�. i:o`si' °"-:.;a°E Parking Lot ,- -L rvrz. "•\\7 i`IN if II II r NORTH • o E CE ,.,Park) Extension SEISMIC LOME: 43 PROPOSED USE. VICINITY MAP TABULATION SITE_PLAN- CRITERIA • - 1.0 3a Sol 8.1 S N.faxes SHEET NO OF DATE ,pyDol p DRAWN.Al.F ".1 • CHECK.T.¢C. • • PAT*.PAT*. PAP • LeCKIG WF 111 ? fF:PIOf• 116.4 rreiVie r NH2AW(iQt.111 0-tr • T—,- - N P 11'4,'E -- 1-- � --}�_ • air �* I Caa✓-34NPL0 I •1 _ —ram - 6✓ I_ • otA �, V 1- ' , —--- - ycPMseI) _ m la o • iiijjiiiii N4 imi — -- — _E Tom•RL ___ l M X - 1 4� �� h rw ron6wNsr P)i /h I-1—I •--- I mkt ' Z 'a aefy„m M EXISTING PROPERTY LINE I L-- • �' —•— I Y Ye '►�• w.FX�T// . �1 (C CT) x J ` I 1 J i Existing I =� 0- i �K:�—1—, W J W 3 \, I I I f T I I l MFy�T •::.I r - o Q =L *I•� > afz I 1 1 ✓ \Y '•�, [TIL:ry Ca9eel.aYi--7''• _ I • r . \ • \``. I ExYtYq RFJdr29 Existing Building 3 Story O ., 1 • 1 , . . . . ffice Building += 1 II Ti IJ 1 / \ I NO DESCRIPTION DATE • >rtC vi!aa lb/law µ/.3'D. I I Existing Phase I ' 1 1 �� nf I . • / POWELL AVENUE S.W. ' `2V0[ ii..-1-1,H HNfT� [opNiwl.Iw�b .xt� rwl[R N• (u¢: [ ws vM..a - _ _ _ s11p4.1a'IhlfifG>.IIHCQHMf.701 k' —41—flvw • rJn[n%v:nirgeon0K Qe wr Pa*. aMi: [,,n�RV[Ntin _s, / t �r�yq [vrwo lino-,r0,4rAI fd•W IhTd se[[5tl�"EquitiesSouth.Su..lro _.). i y yEFWIkM k-( N'bG�1�+.12� i&V+.aib°Q.b,gtxl(l lig uatin { ;y INN[TFR. ilP.L. Ylm 6trtrt va.v Architects • •a A.ttl..YN 121 j \ . IV `^"� 'Li! 1,105[.rF NiWi[R: 1M MtWll.tun Group�1 - \ N 1 iaa2it2t1an ielAlt"".[lll .2 at:l vy.0Z: ,250 S.v. • 12361 411-6611. • _ -•' Existing Parting: 2•Stall.• CIVIL FN616F1• A�O9 Me6'NItN�rpi tint ra (i6e1 niilat��� • - ,6 6":a: 11 Stalls Parking Lot . -----7\ . �L Ton rant.:: w):tall, :Ii[uw: Teyoae • ad (� $F 2 tin: •S.F.N ti6,, Norm 2aF: N N2. r.�l Extension sav[c TOW: Al • [.wn„ro.nMn,n.n, • •NDSCAPE PLAN) \ VICINITY MAP CRITERIA IE: ar.i ei�11t.,ZIOL;. TABULATION. - SITE PLAN' CRRERIA Se,is1'-3O'O' .IOE 0." • SHEET NO CIFDATE • - • I CMS=•,34H. • • • • THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN PREPARED FOR PERMIT APPLICATION AND IS SUB- Ma. • JEGT TO RENEW AND MODIFICATIONS • _ __ BY GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES. daTEs AND 3eecxexcAT--FOR---DRAINS DO NOT USE FOR CONSTRUCTION1(8 o- 1. ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL IN ACCORDANCE WITH •STANDARD ____ A DATE: it M Z4 M As TA e' • PREPARSPECIPED SE FOR MUNICIPAL PUBLIC WORKS CONSTPEELERUC(TEES 3 INCEST 1 INCH CORRUGATIONS_-���- - PREPARED BY WASHINGTON STATE CHAPTER AIBRICAN PUBLIC MOMS NOh: .........A.A......................A.A....................A.A........... Top to to moand22 Go mow° ,. ASSOCIATION,1981(APRA)AND CITY OP KERWIN STANDARDS. e 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE AND MAINTAIN TEMPORARY MISESRE DOGE GALVSSREEO STEEL ALUMINUM �pMf is...mot. 1..5011 aN.115.5 SRDIMENTATION/COLLBCTION FACILITIES TO INSURE THAT SEDIMENT °uW'N Ia'M to 6.,UTI•° LADEN WATER DOES NOT ENTER NATURAL DRAINAGE SYSTEM.THESE 16 36•TO 302• ]0•TO 60• OnnvnM16cnotx of FACILITIES MUST BE IN OPERATION PRIOR TO CLEARING AND 14 NOB•TO lld• 66•TO]2• OGA P9w L CONSSROCTIOS AND MUSS BE MAINTAINED OWTIL CONSTRUCTION AND 12 120• 78•TO 96• ; en LOIDSCAPIRG ARE COMPLETED AND THE POTENTIAL PoR ON-SITE ryp 604 T� EROSION HAS PASSED. '••• •••`••'^^®����•���=��m.a��•�e....e..a 3. ALL LOCATIONS OF EXISTING OTILITI89 SEERS ARE APPROXIMATE 6. BEDDING FOR STORM DRAIN PIPE SHALL BE CLASS•B•PER AP. 0 AND IT SHALL BE THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO VERIFY STANDARD PLAN d0.62(PEA GRAVEL PROM 4 IOPERS BELOW PIPS TEE TRUE AND CORRECT LOCATION SO A3 TO AVOID DAMAGE OR TO SPRINGLIKE FOR PIPES 2] INN AND SMALLER AND PROM 6 DISTURBANCE. INNES BELOW PIPE CO SPRINGLIN¢PRO PIPES 30 INCHES AND LARGER). =7 N 4. A PRECONSTRUCTION CONFERENCE AND A 24 HOUR NOTICE SHALL BE '.' '9 G. REQUIRED PRIOR TO STARTING NEW CONSTRUCTION.IT SHALL B8 ]' FIRE O WIDTH SHALL BE d0 INN MINIMUM OR 1-1/2 TINES THE • THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO SECURE ALL NECESSARY PIPE DIAMETER PLUS 18 INCHES WHICHEVER IS GREATER.BACFILL -• =-- A6AMIT3 PRIOR TO STARTING CONSTROCIOfl. (IN9PBCTION WILL BE SHALL BE PLACED EQUALLY ON BOTH SIDES OP THE PIPE IN 6 INCB "1• "j , A' .J Ea, M - CCOMPLIStlE�eY CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY OTOANOfTIPY THE -I) LAYERS COMPACEO TO 95 P¢RCENT OF MAXIMUM DENSITY. L._ I o$ y SHALL BE 8. TYPE 1 LATCH BASINS seam..BE APWA STANDARD PLAN NO.52, Q UTILITY DEPARTMENT 21 HOURS IN ADVANCE OF BAGPILLIG ALL yLALE I"•1D O W ff CONSTRUCTION. TYPE 1-C WITH APM STANDARD PLAN STANDA ELAN NO.19 FRAME AND GRATE AND °NiY W TYPE 60 OUTLET TRAP. TYPE II GTCHBASIN9 SHALL BE APRA W 5. &TORN SEWN PIPE SHALL Be CONCRETE ROBBER GASYETED ASTM 6TAdDMD ELAN NO.55,TYPE II-C WITH THE SAME FRAME AND yy.v. O W C-14,CL.2 OR ASTM C-76 II CORRUGATED METAL PIPE WITH GAUGE GRATE. a PER CHARS SHOW BELOW.STEEL OR ALUMINUM PIpB SHALL HAVE 9, CONTRACTOR IS SOLBY RESPONSIBLE POR THE MEANSr METHODS AND LEGEND C•L. ASPHALT CONNECTING BANDS. STEEL PIPE SHALL RECEIVE SEQUENCES OP CONSTRUCTION AND FOR THE SAFETY OP WORKERS AND _! wwar�v. > a HALT COATING INSIDE AND OUTSIDE,TREATMENT 1 OR BETTER. OS'HERS ON TOE CON3TO CT SITE. • .0•••�...cc v —K— RIDGE UII CORRUGATED METAL PIPE SHALL HAVE TREATMENT 5 ASPHALT ^• t • (1E`-• Ry.G[LDL y U O COMM WHERE SHOWN ON PLAN.SANITARY SEMER PIPE SHALL BE °`• jjI MINIX.POLYVINYL ERLGIDE (PVC/ PER ANTE D SHALL SDR 35 WITH A I „i•. I �L -�-PRDIC,RD co... m I IROII CL COVER OP 3 FEET.WCOV MAIN PIES SHALL B8 DUCTILE TROPES SE SF2sT GYavES m IRON G.52 WITH A MIRIMUM COVER OF 3 FEET. • - 2-2/3 INCH BY 1/2 INCH(NOMINAL)CORRUGATIONS•...e. ma..1 /( -o_W OSUGH__v�-m•--_____®TESL 7•GOHPT.DEPTH C.L.B ASPOA T C.C. l��l�MINIMUM GAUGE GALVANIEBD STEEL ALUMINUM f �+ % 7`` jI <i�- a,8 sWfU 4"C1.MFT.DEPT.CR115u ED SOAR miLc2loJ•K-•A• • 16 8•TO 48• 8•TO 27• • TOP CnNRSE. .. 11 5. 30•TO 36• 12•COMPT.ORPTH TMY TOTAL F.12 60•TO 66• 12• O 51• pO'd0° DETAIL",SILT COAlT20L.a G.g.'b DAS¢I.¶05. Ts 10 TT• SO.IV 72• o/=•_..i . . - CCWPP. T-MAX DENSITY) 'may 8 W. 0 96• 78• 0 81• •�•'" 'r �I�nri�an..m. - ae PAVING <EC e Twl - • PUSS JRAN II;PROVES]0 O57.5LOM PoR E D15L1v.v.<me A'T - \1 Lv¢INn Use.-4wliu.• \ �\ L NTVP¢I W/OIL SFIARATOA C.o,TYPE I.C. M .{ 2 `\ *� INV. ',Sit 12"N 9S.B8O0 i P 1l.LO ,6 INV. I..ND" INV.1Y.10 SD" i I • IJl \ WV. 8.0136IY i dI [IPW I F •K'i� N 1° 14' 28"E I f CONTRACTOR Non. \n=--- `Do '\\\ 347.61' WHERE STORE DRAIN CROSSES gg% m c/ I ,. P EXISTING WATER MAIN R GA9 �0,`'Y` MAIN PIP.,LOCATE EXIST- ` - ,1ti'20 I I.LINE PRIOR TO ANY CON- 1• 8,0 W SSAOCION.EXCAVATE BY Z 1'i \ 140 F.- -1D/ 8 pile o BAND ONLY W�WITHIN THREE SY ' PELT HNIYONSALLY OR VERT- \1 ICALLY OF 20 INN GAS MAIN. Q M \\\ la.\\\ - s I.o>Y.D i m 01 • Y • \� \\ a -�\ s.".,µ6 N 7°14'28'E 271.36' ""v 60 — ----- R.�Lt--- o__ _—_--- _-------____ — Wiz 'key \ '-1 30.*—\- _ • 1 RDR IN RIDGE LiNR7 \.---�, _ •Q' :;•sflg.', ) - .N 32.. `\ L- - - - -- I DP - ?;�:RNeW,° .IRP R.1 3 a \ 1/ �\� \y • I ri �of� .Ix • z• o1 • I D PN. ) o OrOf' '' RGG \‘:'\v''' CALL 4B HOURS M\ 1 % H..._.......,. 17• BEFORE YOU DIG \ \\ • `\\ \• PDR• PR61AN IMP"....•.I .n 85161.03 GA.MNAIP�w.•. I APPROVED FOR CONSTRUCTION \ I ZS YI'871.. •..' MICA t W.. 1v1M.T DF Inax mom LPN-NIV85oed� . . , • BEGINNING OF FILE FILE TITLE MICROFILMED AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION Audrey DeJoie NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING , being first duly sworn on oath states that RENTON HEARING EXAMINER 7,1 he/she is the Chief Clerk of the RENTON, WASHINGTON A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY" THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER All:- HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUN:_ VALLEY NEWSPAPERS CIL CHAMBERS ON THE SECOND, FLOOR OF CITY HALL, RENTON,,. WASHINGTON ON FEBRUARY 4, 1986, Daily News Journal, Daily Record Chronicle, Daily Globe News AT 9:00 A.M. TO CONSIDER THE FOL-;, LOWING PETITIONS: Daily newspapers published six (6) times a week.That said newspapers FIRST CITY EQUITIES are legal newspapers and are now and have been for more than six (VALLEY OFFICE PARK) Application for site plan approval to allovY months prior to the date of publication referred to,printed and published the construction of a parking lot extension— in the English language continually as daily newspapers in Kent, King containing 61 parking stalls as part 4C County, Washington. Valley Newspapers have been approved as legal : Phase the Valley ce Park,ftl gsi 105-85;property locatedd o on the west site orz newspapers by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for %,I'4well Avenue S.W. at the 1000 block. King County. •s Legal descriptions of the files noteq above are on file in the Renton Building and W. Zoning Department. "'•"" The notice in the exact form attached, was published in the Daily News ALL ONS ARE INVITEDD TO BE PRE' PETITIONS ARE TO PRE Journal , Daily Record Chronicle X , Daily Globe News , (and SENT AT THE PUBLIC HEARING Off«.' FEBRUARY 4, 1986, at 9:00 A.M. Ttr: not in supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS. ,M subscribers during the below stated period. The annexed notice a Published in the Daily Record Chronicle, Jan. 24, 1086. f!1441;) mow Notice of Public Hearin; was published on January 24, 1986 R1340 The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of $19. 31 Subscribed and sworn to before me this 30th day of Jan 19 86 Notary for the State of Washington, residing at Federal Way, King County, Washington. VN 087 Revised 10184 7 I2L�,11 NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTON Audrey De Joi e being first duly sworn on oath states that The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a declaration of non- he/she is the Chief Clerk of the significance for the following projects: CITY OF RENTON (LIBRARY)(ECF- 122.85) VALLEY NEWSPAPERS Applicationpt for to l Shorelinebuld Development Permit to allow building additions of 900 and 1,200 square feet and Daily News Journal, Daily Record Chronicle, Daily Globe News renovation of Main Library with parking lot improvements, file number SM-013-85; Daily newspapers published six (6) times a week.That said newspapers (ov located Rat 100 Mill Avenue South (ovee r the Cedar River). are legal newspapers and are now and have been for more than six FIRST CITY EQUITIES (VALLEY OF- months prior to the date of publication referred to,printed and published FICE PARK)(ECF-123-85) Application for site plan approval to allow in the English language continually as daily newspapers in Kent, King the construction of a 61 parking stall County, Washington. Valley Newspapers have been approved as legal extension to Phase II of Valley Office Park, byorder of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for file number SA-105-85; property located newspapers p g on the west side of Powell Avenue S.W.at King County. the 1000 block. Further information regarding this action is available in the Building and Zoning The notice in the exact form attached, was published in the Daily News Department, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington, 235-2550. Any appeal of Journal , Daily Record Chronicle X , Daily Globe News , (and ERC action must be filed with the Renton not in supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its Hearing Examiner by February 3, 1986. Published in the Daily Record Chronicle subscribers during the below stated period. The annexed notice a January 20, 1986. R1323 Notice of Environmental Determination was published on January 20, 1966 11132 3 The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of $23.76 Subscribed and sworn to before me this 22nd day of r'eb 19 86 (219:49C-/-46.: Notar` Public r the State of Washington, Yg , residing at Federal Way, CITY OF RENTC1 King County, Washington. pI r� VN 087 Revised 10/84 (Cj� APR 1 1386 RIJ!!D;N!G/Z0NiNG D'F'r OF I s o THE CITY OF RENTON U ®/ ® MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 - II c o v rn BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR ® LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER FRED J. KAUFMAN. 235-2593 0,9g1- e0 SEP1°*1 March 3, 1986 Barbara Moss First City Equities 800 Fifth Avenue, Suite 4170 Seattle, Wa. 98104 RE: File No. SA-105-85: First City Equities Dear Ms. Moss: The Examiner's Report regarding the referenced application which was published on February 14, 1986 .has not been appealed within the 14-day period established by ordinance. Therefore, this matter is considered final and is being transmitted to the City Clerk this date for filing. Please feel free to contact this office if further assistance or information is required. Sincerely, Fred J. Kaufman Hearing Examiner FJK:dk 1184E ' cc: ✓ ity Clerk Building & Zoning Department • 0__ _ ___. _ _ ______ _ , ._\..\\___ _____________ __ ____ _ _.1...L.tt..... .„.„.._. :: ., .. . --__I-D-Th_ - _Ilr,_- ,. \ ..•••• •.. .., . . 1 . -- ....-i... .5. . 1 i ...... __ ------ 4...._ ♦ BA `Q 1, \\ bOb .. .1:-.: ' - - • . `'. - - ---- --- -; . ',.. M E T R . .,\?...N s , ..,:i . ..,......,...%,„..",,. . ,.),,,.. .i. . \\ .. s. \ . i 4 \ i \,. 1 , 4 . 0 1 a 1 I I � v• ,�� IG �y,o 15 P O S AIL oRs"ER I 1 1 I N +� i. �� � IIII .�I � I II -II _p l _� ► iiiiNli •. I' . ,pint 7_,-- _ ' \ ` \ ! rdu �uIM'i;I(m1f11,, jamUl\L-1 L-1 ,j.�i�g • ..auu ---.I _ _'rod \\ s\ r %0��111' I t R ��• ��3 "' :....1!...„.....>,;(501;1101111111i00 •uui trmrup.�nrnnuu1. Sul Mall rl [ -V I _ _ H• r I ,/ Y 1 • U 1 j ' ^\ $ I // ( \ o 1\` 4 I — ,.. _ N.ATH L,N .F . -NFV M[APliO� T101� �M1MNo ►it \ \ 00 I ' _ ' I I1 1 I �1 — , i UQ I , r>ii ' , , 1 , : Ic � wP i 1 II �WB-1 . 1111 �l ii \ ,_. ' 1 / I • 71 — — r I is FIRST CITY EQUITIES SA-105-85 APPLICANT FIRST CITY EQUITIES TOTAL AREA ± . 47 ACRE PRINCIPAL ACCESS POWELL AVENUE S . W . • • EXISTING ZONING M.-P , MANUFACTURING PARK EXISTING USE UNDEVELOPED . PROPOSED USE PARKING LOT CONSISTING OF 61 PARKING STALLS COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN MANUFACTURING PARK/MULTIPLE OPTION-OFFICE COMMENTS AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING STATE OF WASHINGTON ) )ss. County, of King ) DOTTY KLINGMAN being first duly sworn, upon oath, deposes and states: That on ' the 14th day of February , 198g . affiant deposited in the mails of the United States a sealed envelope containing a decision or recommendation with postage prepaid, addressed to the parties of record in the below entitled application or petition. SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this /9/11 day of r&Se( A-e , 1986. Notary Public in and for/ the State of Washington, residing at Pja) i-o iJ , therein. Application, Petition, or Case #: FIRST CITY EQUITIES - SA-105-85 (The minutes contain a list of the parties of record.) d _ ✓t 1176 February 14, 1986 OFFICE OF THE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND DECISION. APPLICANT: FIRST CITY EQUITIES FILE NO. SA-105-85 LOCATION: Powell Avenue S.W. at the 1000 Block. SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Approval of a Site Plan to allow the construction of a parking lot containing 61 parking stalls adjacent to Phase II of the Valley 405 Office Park. SUMMARY OF ACTION: Building and Zoning Department Recommendation: Approval with conditions Hearing Examiner Decision: Site Approval request is approved. BUILDING & ZONING The Building & Zoning Department Report was DEPARTMENT REPORT: received by the Examiner on January 28, 1986. PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Building and Zoning Department Report, examining available information on file with the application, and field checking the property and surrounding area, the Examiner conducted a public • hearing on the subject as follows: The hearing was opened on February 4, 1986, at 9:00 A.M. in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. The following exhibits were entered into the record: Exhibit #1 - Yellow file containing application, proof of posting and publication, and other documents pertinent to this request. Exhibit #2 - Map showing parking lot in Phase II. Exhibit #3 - Vicinity Map. A review of the staff report was presented by the Zoning Administrator, Roger Blaylock. Mr. Blaylock stated the requested 61 parking stalls are not required parking for Phase II, (but were requested by their leaseholder), and are not a part of Phase II as they will ultimately become a part of the development of the adjacent building to the west. The site is west of Phase II, with access being through Phase I to the north as well as through Phase II via access roads provided by the applicant for access through the entire site. This proposal meets the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan, services, are available to the area, and the Environmental Review Committee said that any structures built in Tract B would necessitate the construction of Oaksdale Avenue. Mr. Blaylock continued with a review of the comments received by staff noting all departments except the Utility Engineering Division approved the proposal with certain requested conditions. Reviewing the criteria to be considered for site plans it was noted that the parking lot is compatible with the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code, meets landscaping and maneuvering requirements, access is through the property to the east which also provide an extension to the next facility that will be built to the west, and public access to Tract B will be on Oaksdale when it is constructed. Continuing, Mr. Blaylock stated Phase I, due to the configuration of the buildings, the alignment of the parking aisles does not run in a north/south pattern. From a design point of view, in a parking lot where aisles running through the lot are off-set, it tends to create more confusion for the user and a potential for traffic hazards. It was recommended that the emergency access be chained or gated so the parking lot is not used for general circulation. Mr. Blaylock discussed this portion of the site and how it interrelates to the rest of the site, and the functional intertie with the entire property. He stated Phase II is at a building stage where the parking stalls and aisles could be realigned, and recommended this proposal with modifications to its design to align the western boundary with the north lot which will create a large landscaped area which can be utilized by the office users on Phase II. First City Equities SA-105-85 February 14, 1986 Page 2 Calling for testimony from the applicant or their representative, responding was: Barbara Moss 800 Fifth Avenue. Suite 4170 Seattle, Wa. 98104 Ms. Moss responded addressing certain design criteria contained in the staff report stating the purpose of adding the parking lot is to address the market demand for increased parking above that required by City code. Referring to the functionality of the parking lot she stated it is the applicant's feeling that the parking lot should not function as a drive-thru between Phase I and Phase II but have the two phases interrelate with the use of sidewalks; changing the parking lot behind Phase II, she said infrastructure is already installed, paving will begin next week on the parking lot, and if there is a need to redesign it will make a major impact on the building program for the Phase II parking lot. Also responding for the applicant was: Royce Berg, Architect 114 Vine Street Seattle, Wa. 98121 Mr. Berg referred to some of the staff comments regarding utilities and landscaping which he stated will be no problem to change to meet the suggestions of staff. Alignment of parking north and south, he said initially the parking did not align but when the parking extension was added to Phase. II it still did not align so they eliminated the access lane in Phase I behind the westerly most building and replaced it with landscaping thereby forcing traffic to turn, creating a major east/west access point from Powell Avenue to Oaksdale Avenue. This move also aids in circulation through the property for emergency vehicles. Mr. Berg briefly reviewed the 'master plan' for the entire site with regard to projected traffic, access points to be utilized, pedestrian traffic and landscaping. There was no one else, in the audience and no one wishing to testify in opposition to this proposal. A comment was offered by the Hearing Examiner suggesting applicants work with the Building and Zoning department on requests for additional parking (above what is required by City code) in the future. There has been a concern expressed by Metro on previous applications 'in this area with regard to the use of carpools, ridesharing and transit to and from these Valley sites, and the suggestion of future applicants being required to set up some type of Transportation Management Plan to try to alleviate further traffic impacts in the area and encourage use of the transit system. There being no further testimony or comments, the hearing was closed at 9:45 A.M. FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & DECISION: Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: 1. The applicant, First City Equities, has requested approval of a Site Plan for a parking area containing 61 parking stalls. 2. The application file containing the application, the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) documentation, the Building and Zoning Department Report, and other pertinent documents was entered in the record as Exhibit #1. 3. Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and SEPA (RCW 43.21C, 1971, as amended), a Declaration of Non-Significance has been issued for the subject proposal by the Environmental Review Committee (ERC), the responsible official. 4. Plans for the proposal have been reviewed by all City departments affected by the impact of this proposal. 5. The subject site is located in the southeast corner of Tract B of the Washington Technical Center Plat. The site is just west of Phase II of the Valley 405 Office Park, west of Powell Avenue S.W. and north of S.W. Grady Way. :,. First City Equities SA-105-85 February 14, 1986 Page 3 6. The subject site was annexed into the City by the adoption of Ordinance 1745 in April, 1959, as amended by Ordinances 1764 and 1928 adopted in May, 1959 and December, 1961 respectively. The site was automatically zoned G-1 (General: Single Family Residential; Minimum lot size - 35,000 sq ft) upon annexation. The site was rezoned to M-P (Manufacturing Park) in August, 1979 by the enactment of Ordinance 3344. The final plat was approved in July, 1982. 7. The map element of the Comprehensive Plan designates the area in which the subject site is located as suitable for the development of Manufacturing Park/Multiple Option uses, but does not mandate such development without consideration of other policies of the Plan. 8. The applicant is proposing developing a parking lot to serve an already approved 3 story office building which would be located immediately east of the suject site. A 242 stall parking lot has. already been provided to service the building, but the applicant has a tenant who requires additional parking. 9. Staff has recommended that landscaping be added and that the alignment of the parking aisles be adjusted to coincide with adjacent parking aisles. 10. Metro Transit has provided comments which are applicable to development of the proposed parking area. Those comments concern the affects expanded parking has upon alternative .transportation modes. Additional parking stalls serve as a disincentive for employees to use mass transit, van pools or car pools. The extra parking is an invitation to use more single occupant vehicles (SOV). CONCLUSIONS 1. The proposed parking lot appears to serve the public use and interest although the issue of parking supply in relation to traffic generation cannot be lightly ignored. Particularly when traffic impacts have been a continuing concern for the various parcels of the Washington Technical Center Plat, providing parking which invites additional vehicle trips probably deserves more analysis than is provided. Total traffic generation was an issue during preparation of the original EIS for the development of the subject site and has been explored for each new development. 3. Staff has not analyzed the impacts of parking supply on traffic generation but should do so for future development. While City standards provide a minimum level for parking for a 'particular use, it may just be that a ceiling may also be required, especially in light of the anticipated traffic impacts in and around the Green River Valley. 4. The general review criteria for site plans does not appear completely relevant since only a parking lot is being developed and no building is involved. While staff was concerned about the interrelation of the various parking lots proposed for the subject site and also the intertie with surrounding parking, the applicant indicated that they do not want to create a defacto street, but rather a parking lot with limited speeds.. Through aisles would provide an invitation to speed, while the proposed alignment, or lack thereof, would avoid this situation. 5. The parking lot'will be landscaped to blend with the principal or original parking area. Aisle width will permit emergency access and otherwise meets code requirements. 6. The ultimate plans for the remainder of Tract B are not under review and remain speculative at this point. A circulation pattern which incorporates the subject parking area, and the adjacent eastern and northern parking areas to connect to development west of the subject site may need additional exploration. There are a great many cars and aisle intersections at other than 90 degree angles which complicate manuevering. The use of parking areas to provide through circulation between arterial and feeder/collector streets may therefore, be inappropriate and should be subject to additional analysis. 7. Staff and the applicant are on notice that the issue of providing excess parking capacity and utilizing parking areas to provide cross circulation routes should be more thoroughly reviewed in future requests. 1 , r • First City Equities SA-105-85 February 14, 1986 Page 4 DECISION The proposed parking lot is approved. ORDERED THIS 14th day of February, 1986. FRED J. KAUF N HEARING EXA NER TRANSMITTED THIS 14th day of February, 1986 to the parties of record: , Barbara Moss First City Equities 800 Fifth Avenue, Suite 4170 Seattle, Wa. 98104 Royce Berg, Architect 114 Vine Street Seattle, Wa. 98121 TRANSMITTED THIS 14th day of February, 1986 to the following: Mayor Barbara Y. Shinpoch Councilman Richard M. Stredicke Richard Houghton, Public Works Director Larry M. Springer; Policy Development Director Members, Renton Planning Commission Ronald Nelson, Building & Zoning Director Glen Gordon, Fire Marshal Roger Blaylock, Zoning Administrator Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Renton Record-Chronicle Pursuant to Title IV, Section 3015 of the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before February 28, 1986. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for review by the Examiner within fourteen (14) days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific errors relied upon by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record, take further action as he deems proper. An appeal to the City_ Council is governed by Title IV, Section 3016, which requires that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk, accompanying a filing fee of $75.00 and meeting other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection or purchase in the Finance Department, first floor of City Hall. The Appearance of Fairness Doctrine provides that no ex parte (private one-on-one) communications may occur concerning land use decisions. This means that parties to a land use decision may not communicate in private with any decision-maker concerning the proposal. Decision-makers in the land use process include both the Hearing, Examiner and members of the City Council. All communications concerning the proposal must be made in public. This permits all interested parties to know the contents of the communication and would allow them to openly rebut the evidence. Any violation of this doctrine would result in the invalidation of the request by the Court. The Doctrine applies not only to the initial public hearing but to all Requests for Reconsideration as well as Appeals to the City Council. For purposes of these decisions and recommendations the terms "Should" and "Shall" are to be considered mandatory. The term "May" will be considered discretionary. When the report is a recommendation to the City Council the terms "should" and "shall" are intended to inform the City Council that if they approve the recommendation the items should be mandatory to preserve the intent of the decision. r r. 14 Ya... M W'+i I I I • MM fI1�MIM(I..N!/Vf IW'MMAf{ I .j -- - •r�s•.r■ ---- ICI _____.:_iitsli __.�1i!' �r.J���::,'— c�/� I • Pales Elowlos Wow.I) M US ot • I.ewrr Z - _ ;?i 'ii 1.- ,.��- - - I 00 t 0W1 a iiiiiiiiiiiit iiiiiiii= ► --------_ nui40..:W_.- . ill � � L' ..." a--t - P�� -- i • §cc g . 1 4_In r " E ' .. ....,...,Lore., 9 II IEMI..m1/ Exiling Mao. 1 Slavomw 11rs11 _ :I ; 1.._ I 1\ — I ---- - 11 t Pew .,..9+•�...�.., pr.. - V_._.____________.____.__r_____.___..::__L_._.._____----___l--..__—___.________... ...4. _ POWELL AVENUE S.W. 2 [VK .1� R/O• Yw. wvL.....p • VA s �. IA�y slaw.ns►'lal+lr V•W MA Y::11. a!e 2 d� i� w�rti+w{ wow-.+�.w .w.....04........... C v:n":...,.... •• `+ a nn. .�.�r,6..11.n. / IOI1Il ILA.4.11 / SCR II • LIEN"""t.: lY.ldl..lr tr. \` \ . ' Y.. plt n... ..IY.11. 64 ti.l Mn�.M: .I. Ip�l YI-bw \ ow. •.1 I.YI../211 !B lv1Y MY MOP m��..1 nl.:.. -a.i i:i.m Parking Lot h ........ IIII.. -oo,�..� 1` 4�I r... .na.... . NORN M ..L....•• ml Extension :: u. .. `..,. ... PLAID 1 VICINITY MAP TABULATION E.7SITE PLANT CWREpA ® AO 1. M(T O CO - lisrsr-10'0* • Mane o.- .ar+ L.1 cowk .2197Z BUILDING AND.ZONING DEPARTMENT ;j PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING FEBRUARY 4. 1986 APPLICANT: FIRST CITY EQUITIES FILE NUMBER: SA-105-85 A. SUMMARY & PURPOSE OF REQUEST: The applicant seeks site plan approval to allow the construction of a parking lot containing 61 parking stalls adjacent to Phase II of the Valley 405 Office Park. B. GENERAL INFORMATION: 1. Owner of Record: First City Equities 2. Applicant: First City Equities 3. Location: (Vicinity Map Attached) Located on Powell Avenue S.W. at the 1000 block. 4. Existing Zoning: M-P, Manufacturing Park 5. Existing Zoning in the Area: G-1, General Use: M-P. Manufacturing Park 6. Comprehensive Land Use Plan: Manufacturing Park/Multiple Option - Office 7. Size of Property: t .47 acre 8. Access: Powell Avenue S.W. 9. Land Use: Undeveloped Property 10. Neighborhood Characteristics: North: Office. Light Industrial East: Office, Warehousing, Light Industrial V South: Office, I-405 West: Undeveloped Property. Metro Treatment Plant C. HISTORY/BACKGROUND: Action File Ordinance Date Annexation V --- 1745 Apr. 4, 1959 • Corrected --- 1764 May 19, 1959 • Corrected --- 1928 Dec. 12, 1961 Rezone (G - M-P) R-328-79 3344 Aug. 17. 1979 Preliminary Plat PP-056-80 --- June 15, 1981 Final Plat FP-096-81 --- July 19, 1982 D. V PUBLIC SERVICES:. 1. Utilities: a. Water: A 12-inch water line extends north-south along Powell Avenue S.W. adjacent to the subject site. b. Sewer: A 10-inch sanitary sewer is located along Powell Avenue S.W. adjacent to the subject site. c. Storm Water Drainage: Storm water for the subject site runs into the Springbrook Drainage System. PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER FIRST CITY EQUITIES, FILE NO. SA-105-85 FEBRUARY 4, 1986 'PAGE 2 2. Fire Protection: Provided by the City of Renton as per ordinance requirements. 3. Transit: Metro Transit route No. 912 operates along S.W. Grady Way approximately 200 feet south of the subject site. 4. Schools: a. Elementary Schools: N/A b. Middle Schools: N/A c. High Schools: N/A 5. Recreation: N/A E. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE ZONING CODE: 1. Section 4-730, Manufacturing Park (M-P). 2. Section 4-744(F)(2), Landscaping Requirement, Green River Valley. F. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR OTHER OFFICIAL CITY DOCUMENT: 1. Industrial Goal and Policies, Policies Element, City of Renton Comprehensive Plan Compendium, January 1985, p. 18-19. 2. Green River Valley Policy Plan, City of Renton Comprehensive Plan Compendium, January 1985, p. 31-50. 3. Title IV, Chapter 22, Parking and Loading Ordinance. G. DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS: 1. The applicant, First City Equities, is requesting site plan approval to allow the construction of a parking, lot containing 61 parking spaces adjacent to Phase II of Valley 405 Office Park. This parking lot expansion is not necessary to meet the minimum requirements for parking in Phase IL 2. The proposal generally complies with the Comprehensive Plan designation of, Office Park for the subject site and provides supporting parking facilities for the development of an office park. It also complies with the minimum, dimensional requirements of both the parking and loading ordinance and the zoning code designation.of M-P, Manufacturing Park. 3. The Environmental Review Committee has issued a declaration of non-significance for the subject proposal. The appeal period will expire on Monday, February 3, 1986, at 5 p.m. 4. Various City departments have reviewed the proposed construction of the parking lot. The Building Division, Engineering Division, Parks and Recreation Department and Police Department have all recommeneded approval without comment. The following departments have recommended approval, approval with conditions, or denial with the following conditions: • Zoning Division: Approved. Suggest incorporating evergreen shrubery and evergreen trees into the landscape design of parking lot. January 8, 1986 • Policy Development Department: Approved. Perhaps the aisles of the two parking lots (the one adjacent on the north and the subject site) could be adjusted such that they would mesh. January 2, 1986 tl PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER FIRST CITY EQUITIES, FILE NO. SA-105-85 FEBRUARY 4, 1986 PAGE 3 • Traffic Engineering: Approved. Holvick deRegt Koering's latecomer's agreement waived by agreement between First City Equities and HDK. January 2, 1986 • Fire Department: Approved with conditions. That applicant meet all City requirements for fire service, water mains and fire hydrants and install new hydrant indicated on map. January 7, 1986 • Utility Engineering Division: Not approved. Want additional information on property to west and how it might develop. System development charge -- water/approximately $820. System development charge -- sewer/approximately $820. NOTE: Existing utilities should be shown additional extensions of water mains to the west that may be required. January 20, 1986 5. In the review of site plan, the staff and the Hearing Examiner should normally consider the following criteria: • Compatibility of Adjacent Structures • Compliance with the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code • Access (Both General and Emergency) • Functionality of Parking Lot • Traffic Circulation (Both Onsite and Offsite) • Pedestrian Circulation • Usable Public Open Space • Onsite Recreation It appears that only five of the eight criteria are actually appropriate. The criteria dealing with compatibility of adjacent structures, usable public open space and onsite recreation are not appropriate in the discussion. Compliance with the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code: The subject site is located in an area that is rapidly undergoing a transition from undeveloped property to high intensity office park uses. The client, the Boeing Company, believes that the availability of parking is critical to their operation. In fact, in this application they are oversupplying parking above that required by City code. Therefore, the parking lot presently stands on its own but must be functionally tied to the adjacent use and at the same time allowed to be separated when other future functions demand parking for code requirements. The proposal does comply with the intent of the Comprehensive Plan and the specificity of the zoning code. Access: The access to the parking area will be initially through the adjacent development site of Phase II. It will initially support Phase II but in the future may support the new development to the west. Emergency access is also provided through the same east-west access routes that will be continued across the development site of First City Equities Valley 405 Office Park. PRELIMINARY REPOR 10 THE HEARING EXAMINER t FIRST CITY EQUITIES, FILE NO. SA-105-85 FEBRUARY 4, 1986 PAGE 4 Functionality of the Parking Lot: The parking lot has a critical design problem in that it does not blend with the development to the north and creates some serious jogs in circulation that might intimidate the individual motorist. Not only will Boeing occupy, Phase II development but it is presently occupying the three buildings to the north. The most logical solution to align the parking aisles is to provide more landscaping and open space adjacent to_the Phase II building. However, we are not discussing the site plan for Phase II which does comply with the code. The proposal as submitted for the parking lot also complies with the code, but from a design standpoint it creates complications in function and maneuvering of automobiles on the site. One interesting side issue arises in that more parking is provided than originally estimated by City code and staff. We would envision that the building itself will have more employees, thus, a greater need for onsite recreation and public open space. Traffic Circulation: Offsite traffic circulation has been addressed in the updated traffic study provided. Some modification will have to occur as incremental increases in employment population is established. Onsite traffic circulation is difficult at the interface between the building lot to the north and the subject site. Pedestrian Circulation: The site plan continues the pedestrian circulation to the projects to the west. There does not appear to be any major problem associated with pedestrian circulation in the project as presented. ISSUE: WHAT IS SITE PLAN APPROVAL? 6. Site plan, approval is a land use review process that analyzes site layouts in more depth than just the compliance with the City code. City departments: can administer the City code as is specifically prescribed. How the individual' pieces of property interrelate with one another becomes critical in the site! plan process. Therefore, the site plan as presented should not be considered, acceptable and should be rejected by the Hearing Examiner. 7. In conclusion, the proposal meets the specifics of the zoning code and the parking and loading ordinance. It complies with the intent of the Comprehensive Plan. However, from a design standpoint the proposal lacks the fine tuning necessary to make it function at its optimum level. The site is functional and meets minimum functional standards. H. DEPARTMENTAL RECOMMENDATION: Based upon the above analysis the site plan request, file number SA-105-85, by First City Equities, should be approved subject to the condition that 25 feet of landscaping be placed adjacent to the building in Phase II and that the parking aisles align with the development established to the north of Phase II and the subject site. The Building and Zoning Department realizes that this modifies the Hearing Examiner's approval on Phase II, but the applicant is seeking approval of a parking area that would support the tenant proposed for occupancy in Phase II. Therefore, we believe it warrants reconsideration in the context of the adjacent developments. I i 1 ' I bOb - . / ' M-i. - , 4 I.:...V.'•-,•7...: ‘. —' --- 11 M E T R 1 i -' f 1 ti 4 '1 =---- --- 1G-1--- : \\.'. i- •_ I o p.G� G ' y�o \` 'D 15 P O 5 AIL ` \ I RjNr`R k A \ I f N� /-'� 1 . ���rt IIIIIIII :11i 1� I 11 :II 11 n ,� 1 aoa,,, I' ;.„„ - III! , is, ; •/ � - 4, I�IIIIIIIUIM1. 1(11 • 'iiildl - �^ , — . -: . , ; a,.• pass --� >031 --Cligl' ,.• ` 11' \ -'Tull ��- , .• dIlli IIIII' ���I Idl! !Ill 1111 ' ' / fa.; 4e. -- -%- 1 i 1:Ip� ;_ ilk/ ,, , if _ , 1\ oi • `\ ` , N.ATH L:N .F _ .t-NRY MS^Ogna or -riot: p_.,1N NO.4. c u 1 t d:.\,\\c----------' 1 r d , _Yito 1fl > W 1 . 1g ..E; — L2B-1 , ; g • ° li Qt, 1\ _-7-,..... .--- LI : . r • I FIRST CITY EQUITIES SA-105-85 APPLICANT FIRST CITY EQUITIES TOTAL AREA - . 47 ACRE . PRINCIPAL ACCESS POWELL AVENUE S . W. EXISTING ZONING M.-P , MANUFACTURING PARK EXISTING USE UNDEVELOPED PROPOSED USE PARKING LOT CONSISTING OF 61 PARKING STALLS COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN MANUFACTURING PARK/MULTIPLE OPTION-OFFICE COMMENTS • on weep 70.•,D9q i.V ..� • AO a lM1{1.411.•1 ,O119X D-OC-.l * ii NVid3LS ® - - -zi dYfl A • 050 COW. MA NOM .ox• 1. \c..\,....________ 191,,.I] Mtt•q , • H9l-IH a V1 1 i 1 n! s:,wA sl,n•] .'- • DOc „„et,!I te/VS.M H1 9 I.I:A mi 1 _ fir tn"x!ft�l .'I 1 u1r n. I 1 �!. \ -.------------- •wawa.r iiii'i /}mum • _ T:IFFS.�a 4? Aid n.ww• Iw :a.UMW j A • to -' 'M7 arK3A1r 17i111w / • I1 t 1 1 l I • .1A IMAM= x,1 i c I 1 rwy N�+a I I rift/ 1 I . 1 I . 1 LIp-,..,.s rvw a.a hINO6LI 1+ i 1_v. � avuori II. • x",w....e11T.1 N • *m • • I _ es. _ II 1 3 _ ICI 1 m z to 11 J —.— AAlidoad ollusixa m_W / -�- l =1r�-- -_m•—T I .I 7tiN !i►r��11 �l • • �I - Zmi ��■ ,. WIC 9�I�� .-•i lik -ter-- - •.], -- 14 .•. ,� x ■ ■ "IT'�.� �Li ■YI/ _ 11 R ' 111 t .' ' L r.:. CI s•1W1 �IiHV• K ' s e r] -Pr..' r. . r, imisu ffi rav io-PS 1 ALtl3dOtld Mall .W79 544111d IS 23 X +o.1'SOOT • e,.,T_" :.y i S3C 111�J37 1011.1 'r-.•s.•e or.....•+ 1n9o„xm.11.n.1.10 r-'a...,.. ...,,.n �' rite,' wA - • ---- —- - - O.rit .0 rrz-1•1 um. .1 .»9 It an..am m MO ma m no mom•..s.•D19. - • • 1 • •�,a n o.aa 1 ell WM'OM SO CII MOM in Moo.V.•raam10 TOMO. w• • f►o•e,ao • r�W J' 0 ON MOO 44 OW ® . 7 re��� "" NIV"Id 3 19 ►iournevi dVN-nua3IA .m e.nen —.... .w.. .r i e IWb amt.,wu .rs win :nw 1, 'i'1oo.D: ANe.li nft�DMaiwnr, 1 \`......-/-- . • 101041d wntrt i won n . r w iwi �.eP'N.'''eme m•e :wire.wnuo �,. iv.r r r.r•... :nnwe nuo \ .ra n.A-e- .s we'w v rl- .ni i ;. , \ . _ en,nen•7.r a-e:e.r i 'ilp /1 y rn.ner.r r. :meovr wrn�. J uu Ili n / .neon Me++Me4'p.nu wwri -OK*•fin' Aft Me'M+•� i ww n,n vo•V.+i e 1•.°.' :� pole ai•i1 ,vr•ede�eoe yrry rle7 At {� wn.. �•.Oi7 u.yrm �1ro 1 ! u e.en o n. •ar usnw lII.. WOUNMVTOMM \ . + �--=--- ----------• �_ -=- -r----- -- -----------. --------- . 1. ME 80441110.113 Eft . r 1 .. 1 j 1 7 LH,. 1 ' is . WI . I CO dwa SWAMI awr ww.a `I• 1` .��_ l..• C i C 1• - IJ 1 I -iJ1 a ° .N..,..:„, _J I l l l Ill I I I I I I I I� ` '1 • �, I I in etra+ow oNaari—a z �. m r - -- r:1r--------- �..----II rr--8 i7 !!!S!�!�!!�!�e lss!!S!!e!!!�J 'i �• • WI 115) IA Ili I i _�_�� I— - — I Ii I I-i I how, m - . M - 11 e . . • • 1 V tkl I • • • • • • • • NO D:CUNOR WO SON HMS . - • MORO?ANUCANOMOISS W MOM ER SPtCtPIGS2W[POI M.DRAM. k,7 TO ROOT MOOf mPUR1Y.TAL_A6ENCIF3. ' • OO N07 UtE fa CONi1A11Ci1l 1. ALL c0Rr0OCTION SMALL • • 01 U It Ac.oADANa NIT[ 'STANDARD L4-bs � NI{CIPIGTtOR POE Nn]CIPAL PUBLIC NOV.CONSnOCTIole •n[PAW•T B11N01NLl2N RAP.Cann DORICMI PUBLIC WS 7 INC.BT 1 INCH CGIOGASIOR eV EStOCLSIW.1953 IAINAI AND CITY OP 0•tI011{tAMUARO•. weel�•YA••,•�•LYItiOw.•- 2. COlP.ALTO[ tAAI,I. P.OVIOM AND MAINTAIN OAOO{ OIU.VMI{C STESL AtA1IN011 Moves Wyw•.I 110fATlW/COLIJLT]ON PACILRtn TO n2OB[TEAT am21QRT __I_Pwnm No root. NN0 1f LESR ton WES NOT ENT.YYUW DYSNAW{TBTOI.TeESt If•TO.10]• IO•TO Sr Iw„4w 1w•r.Rw1•r. of Z WTION PRIOR TOCLAN[C AND !f lOr TO llf• Bf•TO.. CONBTNOCSION AMU non NAIRAIn=ownCw{r0OCTION an 12 1]0• 7{•TO P{• S PACILITtn MUSS SI I[ OP L0MU0WIC AllCOMPLT•D AND us puma. TOO oe-SSTs e e •ROEsw W PASS.. TprpB pA TP.p y 1 R ROLL 2. At]. luaus'Tlluaus' o.R2NT]R 0lfLR TS Am au APPtOEfpiO e. •ESOIC PR •PGA t•DY 7277 Nr.•R CMS'•r rR ArR{ IS OSTKORro L TO T CDNIYLTOVIT 0n1•STY TERI. STA PLR NO.62 MA maE 10T¢PODS 4 INt PIES SR tRN AC mucT tOCATI00 [D AS TO AVOID DMA.OR TO •nIEOLIq TOR PUTS xl INC,AND NNALIa AND PLR B DINTOWOCE. SNOW ARLON PITS TO BPR1CLIn FOR PIPES 30 MIMS AMU 21) tJE0R1. I 4. A r0[NN0T01CTION OONn0p1C0 RD A If OWN NOTICE MOLL •• • ,�.,' REWIRE) PRIOR TO MAW.RN CON0TNURIOS-IT n5LL 5 7. n7NCM NlTP. OALL 70 fE INCT CNIIMII OA 1-7/I 77.0 T0[ O T.CONTRACTOR'S OESPORIBIL1rY TO B[01ES ALL NLCESOM PIP.OI0NPlAC PLO!11 DICERS NS1CM[VY IS GACAIES.I CATILL _-___ • `2►[NNln PRIOR TO RARTIC CON.4TAORSM. IIESP6CT2W HILL Si SMALL BR PLACED OTOALLY ON SOTS BIDES OF Tar PIP[IN 4 INCEI•!' S r Att1.1 7 ST A OSPRESLIRASIVS OP SR CITY OP OESiOM1.IT tJ17W COIVACTES TO 93 PESCLR OP N.M.OnElrY. .L- 1 /,y®. 0* -J tl l..•.. II n0 CONSRACSOR•N NnPWI•ILP TO NO}IrT P.[ I t. T}Ii 1 CM" WIR! eN•r•M.APY RMOW PW R.T]. • OTILST OUAlrlmi 34 eWES P.MOOCH N YGPIWO Au (Q� COYrP.Ct1R. STY[1-C CSS AP.STAESW PW NO-fP PM=AC DI1.AES wW wY *GALE 1-.LO O W TT. fY LlS00 TRAP, TYPE II GTCN•.1112 DRALL RA AMU% S. {SUN EMS TIP.N[ALL AN CONC♦0n ROESES IP! ES STAMUARD FLAN C.SS,RP[II-C Cn T. BA6[ PL. AMU - C-If•CL.]OR AM C-7f II CORRUGATn METAL PIP.VIII GA80 t wP.. 0 PES CSARt NtRN ARLa.MSC 011 A[SMSNON PIPt BULL RATS _ • • . YT[ATIOR co.. ...... BAN00.. ..... PIP[ SNAL ASCSIVE P. CONTMIROR IS SOLES RESPORnL PLO Teo MANS.NITROUS AC K.Y AOPWT COATING INSIDE PIP A110,WTSIDd,rRGt11YT 1 ON•BTtdR. SACNENCn OP CONSTRUCTION AMU FON Tin SAINTY OF NO{RESB AC Mr�•.•de�. L0•NNE J CORRUGATED NNTAL PIP. 6011.E RAVE TRRAT1mT S aseaau OT•ESS OS Sot CONSTRUCTION SIP.. �'..•.ue•. COATING NNESO 56011M CO VC) WI TART B0.ES•t00 e351 Of • �• .-C- ,N1b•■LWC I V 4. ' 011110roman/ DWN20[ IT. IES AS. 0 3014 en 2S NITS A 1=1m1 df.Leapt (A MINIMUN COVES OP 3 P[ST.YTL MIN PIPE SMALL •[ DUCTILE !•R G.S]NSR•NSNI1011 COVES OP]PAR- �� .-©-Aa.dV aA•KOYI i . -Juba ►ADreANv VW...el m 2-2/I IR=BY 1/2 INCA IN0111NAL1 CONIOGATIOM M.N.00080 01U.VRISES ST6t4 A.v1R[ON :iE_/'4/ 0 1� �j' 7'LMIT.Den• cL.e•SrY•CT fOit. •Wtl'�, GI 1{ f/• N/�t!7 1'[D.R.DSTrY LNySYro 0p; �tcrleY-••-••• ._ lI S•TO n• r TO Zr • 'o•'. p TOP ruu R1E." SL• 70.1b]{• 12•<drf GORY 4TlYc7YBAt.MA . lY 606 To{{• 60 TO Se le .0, uo OW lA7-0 OSTwlt-407.T C.ITLOL ce C.p.•Y .71• {D•TO 7r ,:.:a-.r,P:�s:. «ovr.no reA lux rx.wml - •S lr TO Pf• 7B•TO.Nr '�•,•• q _ TWyleIL_ctcLS a j . • OITLY TO Se IMPSVN0 O 70 0.07.LO WE _ FOR•1GVAr1w1 Too DTICYAOI.G At • • ^e"T7y 1�. (0. �.r 1.L i _1�—. - P 1Y,1 rPNr .........ae- YY. %a•. ` V 1 tRW LONT[ACYDt AorF' -. ---\-4 347.61 j '� N[ESt NPm NAAIN G090Rla 5 / • m �- I I • ESIRINO YSES YIN•W • -Mini*�; • • $7 66 • NAIR FIELD.LC.==NT- 1 2C LIES P.taw ART CON- : ' STRDC.0.1.nCAVAn•T \ ` `'D, O • I •W . YNo wLY NtR MUM TB{tE Pi RR EDATIONT LLY Co VEST- - O _ O ICALT Or 20 1R1 G.MIN. `+; Q Y 1``` nt l 1 : 1? . IZ '--� N1426E236• :1 : i Ia1DDN e-. `� atm• uY•e• — __ — '� '12 32 y - h • Z in in • ;! ..:.p : \ .\ - , 1 .\\- '‘\\A , . - \ \%\\ \ I • GI a\\\ ' � \ 1 le .. B P. ~ i • 29:si-- , • .14: , — — _ FOR_ �• j�� ;,2o ;z a... 66•• , , AP_P_ROVfD CON8TRUCTION fis161.o3�__rou us! CALL la HOURS \ \\ ,•.0•YwPo.y7N .. ✓t1400424-5555 - -- \ - W y .I :.•:� I ) • •• VN-NND4oWi '' =Y •- REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVIcrrN : `I r ® APPROVED ` J3APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED liff/ • / "9>AI/cow, /l7EBTS i i L C fry ,e 9 c/iiFr”,E,ciI I a"z /c>,eE •SE.evi, t(-107-0,e Oe$VS A,,, / */.0E AC),4 0/0dr ice', /44.1` NEedi ,Yo 2 o 11, /Avon a/97-0r0 O ev /11 R 4\11164- 410 \-d.Vpj NSA, ifist ‘1440101it 47, +`'. ;— , `' 1-11? -►r - - Otig DATE: T /9�r6 SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE ".:64,- REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION :(A! APPROVED DAPPROVED WITH CONDITIONS ONOT APPROVED DATE: / SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : FARS (9 IRFp_ REAARIA la APPROVED DAPPROVED WITH CONDITIONS Jj NOT APPROVED )3 crr_ninrt4fgai, .,...�__-- -- - - -- - -- DATE: 85 .... --. .... . ...W.. . - - - ...� ` ✓ s iwv wr r E] APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONg �� - �' NOT A ROVED , ti Wwr * 'a koms& gatlea. 041 :, rflLflY wAL TO I pnoP�•rN �a bJn•uo-a iT WATER o wi`&#2 r s LATE COMMAYEEII-SEWER NO SrS1EM OmniCMRGE-WATER �,Es 20,4-00 CI i( s ".d� = 482o Oa SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT COARGE-SEWER , }(,,ES '2O> 500 d'X $•0,d= gg S20, 0° SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AIWA CHARGE-WATER , A ro 1zm40 °° SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AREA CHARGE-SEWER No APPROVED WATER PLAN /ll0 v �Ip��:�i t�Tiuri S c, L4c.tl ( �Jr/ APPROVED SEWER PLAN NO Y� A4101ir c_ &o''� op ' "' APPROVED FIRE HYDRANT LOCATIONS - .. VLIaYBG ? - Nri FL.:. DEPT. WO r7 Ats FIRE FLOW A NO 6._11) :i, IF - 13, DATE; l .2V 7- ePZ40 SIGNATUR NSF D ECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 . Form 182 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : /i? / `�� ' -"I illAPPROVED D APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS J 0 NOT APPROVED . k!'! 0 //i'/G C �- E,� , �p•r),-/c-- j /.7 -I, c'"v "--,c'y '' ?-1 yc ."'s / c.1 �1 f.�. C_. /77 lN`t_., I�": --���� E- G:.�_- T I �/ &� -,/ ,, L7 . (.: �-7' - DATE ,- )-----7 • /-> .L•.=5--- SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED 'REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION ; NC r•ti/45Er• ./A/ 0/APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS Ei NOT APPROVED ' ie,, 5 DATE: /2 3/f r,S • SIGNATURE OF DI RECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISI ; RucyDgvccaPti ., 121r3PROVED El APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS 0 NOT APPROVED P-9/14-4° . te44 11-6(4 rz). //1 -apkw-11 fraos4el,re* e,z,„6136, 4v1441,14 DATE: / 4(_: SIGNATURE OF DIRE'T R OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : LAG RAPPROVED DAPPROVED WITH CONDITIONS El NOT APPROVED DATE: / P/--PC-- SIGN R DIRECTOR OR AUT ORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 R VIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : ZOiUi O6 APPROVED 0 APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED a3GC565.-( 11'UC 0 RC elt) H R 13i'e/z j 6Ve,12Gtee/v -rREs Irv-fo LAroosolpI C-16s6fu c rPiKK irUG coo ` ) vv:I� DATE: 1'' o -'86 SIGNATURE OF DIREC R �OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE .. a 1015N CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST NO.: ECF-123-85 APPLICATION NO(s).: SA-105-85 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Application for site plan approval to allow the construction of a 61 parking stall extension toy • Phase II of Valley Office Park. PROPONENT: First City Equities (Valley Office Park) LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Property located on the west side of Powell Avenue S.W. at the 1000 block. LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton, Building and Zoning Department. The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the le d agency.' This information is available to the public on request. There is no comment period for this DNS. Responsible Official: Environmental Review Committee City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055 Phone: 235-2550 APPEAL: You may appeal this determination in writing to Renton Hearing Examiner no later than February 3, 1986. • You should be prepared to make specific factual objections. Contact City of Renton, Building and Zoning Department to read or ask about the procedures for SEPA appeals. DATE OF DECISION: January 15, 1986 PUBLICATION DATE: January 20, 1986 1 II' onald G. Nelson l'ry M. Sp inlr Building and Zoning Director Policy Develo. a=nt Dirl tor Ric and C. hton Public Works Director , 2184Z NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON HEARING EXAMINER RENTON, WASHINGTON A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS ON THE SECOND FLOOR OF CITY HALL, RENTON, WASHINGTON ON FEBRUARY 4, 1986, AT 9:00 A.M. TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS: FIRST CITY EQUITIES (VALLEY OFFICE PARK) Application for site plan approval to allow the construction of a parking lot extension containting 61 parking stalls as part of Phase II of the Valley Office Park, file SA-105-85; property located on the west site of Powell Avenue S.W. at the 1000 block. Legal descriptions of the files noted above are on file in the Renton Building and Zoning Department. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT THE PUBLIC HEARING ON FEBRUARY 4, 1986, AT 9:00 A.M. TO EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS. PUBLISHED : January 24, 1986 Ronald G. Nelson Building and Zoning Director '.CERTIFICATION I, DELORES C. BEEDLE, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THREE COPIES OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENTS WERE POSTED BY ME IN THREE CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED ABOVE AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW. ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a Notary Public, in nd for the State of Washington residing in on the a.6F ' d y of January, 1986. 1•%-1: T SIGNED: .ta " ci C'�"P. REN;'r)1 BUILDING &. ZONING DEFY TENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF — 123 _ 85 APPLICATION NO(S) : SITE PLAN APPROVAL (SA-105-85) PROPONENT : FIRST CITY EQUITIES PROJECT TITLE : PARKING LOT EXTENTION TO PHASE II - VALLEY OFFICE PARK. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL. TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF A 61 PARKING STALL EXTENTION TO PHASE II OF VALLEY OFFICE PARK. LOCATION : LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF POWELL AVENUE S.W. AT THE 1000 BLOCK. TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 1/15/86 0 ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : UTILITIES ENG . DIVISION 0 FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT BUILDING & .._N_ DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT El POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ® OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING& ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P.M. ON JANUARY 9, 1986 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DI ISION : l�G APPROVED II APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS ® NOT APPROVED DATE: /Q `EP1Pdr-- SIGN/ IR • DIRECTOR OR AUT ORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 RENT-7 BUILDING &, ZONING DEPr NAENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 123 _ 85 APPLICATION NO(S) : SITE PLAN APPROVAL (SA-105-85) PROPONENT : FIRST CITY EQUITIES PROJECT TITLE: PARKING LOT EXTENTION TO PHASE II - VALLEY OFFICE PARK. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL. TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF A 61 PARKING STALL EXTENTION TO PHASE II OF VALLEY OFFICE PARK. LOCATION : LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF POWELL AVENUE S.W. AT THE 1000 BLOCK. TO 0 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 1/15/86 ly:] ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : 11 UTILITIES ENG . DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT 0 POLICE DEPARTMENT POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P .M. ON JANUARY 9, 1986 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DI IISION : E.N4,00ve /A/67 APPROVED • APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS ONOT APPROVED i gz6DATE: 0" / r6 SIG NATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 REN'? BUILDING &: ZONING DEP iTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 123 _ 85 APPLICATION NO(S) : SITE PLAN APPROVAL (SA-105-85) PROPONENT : FIRST CITY EQUITIES PROJECT TITLE : PARKING LOT EXTENTION TO PHASE II - VALLEY OFFICE PARK. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL, TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF A 61 PARKING STALL EXTENTION TO PHASE II OF VALLEY OFFICE PARK. LOCATION: LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF POWELL AVENUE S.W. AT THE 1000 BLOCK. TO : El PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 1/15/86 E] ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG . DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION El FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU El PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT 0 BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT 0 POLICE DEPARTMENT POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT El OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGEISTIONSiREGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P .M. ON JANUARY 9, 1986 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : S (5 F..,C /V [(J1V, r 1 APPROVED • APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS ® NOT APPROVED )2 DATE: -TAN 10 85 SIGNATUR OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 b. REN4 1 BUILDING &, ZONING DEP, `FMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 123 _ 85 APPLICATION NO(S) : SITE PLAN APPROVAL (SA-105-85) PROPONENT: FIRST CITY EQUITIES PROJECT TITLE: PARKING LOT EXTENTION TO PHASE II - VALLEY OFFICE PARK. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL. TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF A 61 PARKING STALL EXTENTION TO PHASE II OF VALLEY OFFICE PARK. LOCATION : LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF POWELL AVENUE S.W. AT THE 1000 BLOCK. T0 : PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 1/15/86 El ENGINEERING DIVISION OTRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : DUTILITIES ENG .I DIVISION . 0 FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU EIPARKS & RECREATION 'DEPARTMENT BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT E1POLICE DEPARTMENT OPOLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT OOTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING . PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO TH.E BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P .M. ON JANUARY 9, 1986 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : APPROVED El APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS J NOT APPROVED DATE: / :;27- 5 SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 RENT`;4 BUILDING &. ZONING DEP TMENT • DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 123 _ 85 APPLICATION NO(S) : SITE PLAN APPROVAL (SA-105-85) PROPONENT: FIRST CITY EQUITIES PROJECT TITLE : PARKING LOT EXTENTION TO PHASE II - VALLEY OFFICE PARK. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF A 61 PARKING STALL EXTENTION TO PHASE II OF VALLEY OFFICE PARK. LOCATION : LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF POWELL AVENUE S.W. AT THE 1000 BLOCK. TO : El PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 1/15/86 0 ENGINEERING DIVISION El TRAFFIC ENG . DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : El UTILITIES ENG . DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT Bt1= " ZONING DEPARTMENT 0 POLICE DEPARTMENT El POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING . PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P .M. ON JANUARY 9, 1986 R VIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : ZO(I.)IC 36 12)10[ Di®rk) APPROVED ❑ APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS 0 NOT APPROVED 3 )& S-1 I a)(_,Of I)'1I 1C URGR,6 Rul 6utizoKeeto I rulo (AYioSGn p CD4s iiiu c7r, 194KK I r G L o7' )42_K_A_ DATE : I� O d o6 SIGNATURE OF DIRECIiR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 RENT"" BUILDING &. ZONING DEN MENT ' DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEWiiSHE PTON 1AM2 1986 ECF - 123 _ 85 POLICY nFvFLOPMENT nFPT• APPLICATION NO(S) : SITE PLAN APPROVAL (SA-105-85) PROPONENT: FIRST CITY EQUITIES PROJECT TITLE : PARKING LOT EXTENTION TO PHASE II - VALLEY OFFICE PARK. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL. TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF A 61 PARKING STALL EXTENTION TO PHASE II OF VALLEY OFFICE PARK. LOCATION : LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF POWELL AVENUE S.W. AT THE 1000 BLOCK. TO: 0 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 1/15/86 0 ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : El UTILITIES ENG1 DIVISION 0 FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU 0 PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT 0 BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT E POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING . PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P .M. ON JANUARY 9. 1986 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION ; R,(....tC' 1)&vcf,OP/61E1't-r- PPROVED 0 APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS 0 NOT APPROVED P-9-4116LP 4,64, (64 ofyLe ealOPLI'‘ fra0S4641Se* eorale, I/V-?,,e4Q,1/6e,#,4 DATE: / G ?Sl SIGNATURE OF DIREeT R OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 REN;'`'j1 BUILDING &: ZONING DEP TMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET EC F - 123 _ 85 APPLICATION NO(S) : SITE PLAN APPROVAL (SA-105-85) PROPONENT : FIRST CITY EQUITIES PROJECT TITLE : PARKING LOT EXTENTION TO PHASE II - VALLEY OFFICE PARK. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL. TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF A 61 PARKING STALL EXTENTION TO PHASE II OF VALLEY OFFICE PARK. LOCATION : LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF POWELL AVENUE S.W. AT THE 1000 BLOCK. TO: I. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 1/15/86 ENGINEERING DIVISION j1TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : El UTILITIES ENG . DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU El PARKS & RECREATION 'DEPARTMENT El .BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT Ei POLICE DEPARTMENT Ei POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ID OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING . PLEASE PROVIIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P .M. ON JANUA'RY 9, 1986 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : 77274 ; APPROVED ® APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED l I i i DATE SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORI-Z D REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 RENTON BUILDING &. ZONING DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 123 _ 85 APPLICATION NO(S) : SITE PLAN APPROVAL (SA-105-85) PROPONENT: FIRST CITY EQUITIES PROJECT TITLE : PARKING LOT EXTENTION TO PHASE II - VALLEY OFFICE PARK. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL. TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF A 61 PARKING STALL EXTENTION TO PHASE II OF VALLEY OFFICE PARK. LOCATION : LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF POWELL AVENUE S.W. AT THE 1000 BLOCK. TO: PUBLIC WORK DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 1/15/86 El ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : UTILITIES ENG . DIVISION 51 FIRE PREVENTION BU EAU [1] PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT LIBUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT 0 POLICE DEPARTMENT El POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 11 OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING . PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P .M. ON 1 JANUARY 9, 1986 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : DAPPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS ® NOT APPROVED / / /CA.tJ% /.19EEiS Au C fry .e4-9 U/,iFSM Arat,73' �'/E ,72€ .SE,@v%ct etiATE.e ,ic# /,/.eE Afj'D.e.o i r,-n4 /N Ti'ItLL A/Et4i Acy '.r.ofv? Ato / /ivpi e,tiD O 14.1 /994R tiliv _ • = ,st A . AV*eiNgSVINW*001V*,-4 4411 - - f � �. .��6+4:-,--- DATE: 7 APS4; SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 RENTAN BUILDING &. ZONING DEPA TMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION EVIEW SHEET EC F - 123 _ 85 APPLICATION NO(S) : SITE PLAN APPROVAL (SA-105-85) PROPONENT : FIRST CITY EQUITIES PROJECT TITLE : PARKING LOT EXTENTION TO PHASE II - VALLEY OFFICE PARK. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL. TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF A 61 PARKING STALL EXTENTION TO PHASE II OF VALLEY OFFICE PARK. LOCATION : LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF POWELL AVENUE S.W. AT THE 1000 BLOCK. TO: fl PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 1/15/86 El ENGINEERING DIVISION El TRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : NIUTILITIES ENG . DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU El PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT ri POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT El OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P .M, ON JANUARY 9, 1986 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : •WtjA;1--t/ APPROVED „lyAPPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT A ROVED �tllllJil AlPAOiNu.SUDlECT TO� Waar And�ro�� Intd�o. 0,p _ 1377 Zo u1�SY frJ F4 r LATEfEEti-WATER No ht5t/ . UTE COMERS AGREEMENT-SEWER SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE-WATER yEs t/it.S.0o a �0 _ 4 SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE-SEWER' y, s �2D,food' Sao' gg g2O SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AREA CHARGE-WATER A/p1CO�0 SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AREA CHARGE-SEWER iyo APPROVED WATER PUN ! , f 1pre: c HTiUi S Siio'L6 ee sea4k, APPROVED SEWER PLAN h M94017/a^i- 6t'ZGasi ®F r64- APPROVED FIRE HYDRANT LOCATIONS MAWS -Teriwar 0006 Q vtrea- BY Fl DEPT. ND FIRE FLOW A,,LYSIS NO rDDATE a � g�SIGNATUR •ECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 _JVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW t. -T REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: (�)1 it !Y./E S DATE CIRCULATED: DECEMBER 30_ 1985 COMMENTS DUE: JANUARY 9. 1986 ECF - 123 - 85 APPLICATION NO(s). STTF PIAfy APPROVAL (SA-105-85) PROPONENT: FIRST CITY EQUITIES PROJECT TITLE: PARKING LOT EXTENTION TO PHASE II - 'VALLEY OFFICE PARK. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF A 61 PARKING STALL EXTENTION TO PHASE II OF VALLEY OFFICE PARK., LOCATION: LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF POWELL AVENUE S.W. AT THE 1000 BLOCK. SITE AREA: 0.47 ACRE BUILDING AREA (gross): . N/A • IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS MINOR - MAJOR MORE IMPACT IMPACT INFORMATION 1) Earth 2) Air • 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation : 15) Public Services '✓ 16) Utilities ✓ COMMENTS: • RECOMMENDATION: 11 DNS EJ MITIGATED DNS 1( EIS • • REVIEWED BY:WL S- 11/1"-/ TITLE: , 4:roz.b0 DATE: /— ZI_ o �11i FORM {#14 REVISED 9/10/85 ( :te-,cn 1,;;;Dent. 1 S . • „AVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW !� "t=r`` "°S'� REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: 771 C; DATE CIRCULATED: DECEMBER 30. 1985 COMMENTS DUE* J'ANUAB 1986 ECF - 123 - 85 _ Of* APPLICATION NO(s). STTF .PIAN APPROVAL (MA-105-85) PROPONENT: FIRST CITY EQUITIES PROJECT TITLE: PARKING LOT EXTENTION TO PHASE II -VALLEY OFFICE PARK. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF A 61 PARKING STALL EXTENTION TO PHASE II OF VALLEY OFFICE PARK, LOCATION: LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF POWELL AVENUE S.W. AT THE 1000 BLOCK. • SITE AREA: 0.47 ACRE BUILDING AREA (gross): N/A IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS MINOR MAJOR MORE IMPACT IMPACT INFORMATION 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants • 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities _ COMMENTS: RECOMMENDATION: DNS D MITIGATED DNS n EIS REVIEWED BY: TITLE: . DATE: . 7 /71f1 FORM #14 REVISED 9/10/85 i _<!NVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: g C, l)6 DATE CIRCULATED: DECEMBER 30. 1985 COMMENTS DUE: JANUARY 9, :1986 ECF - 123 - 85 APPLICATION NO(s). STTF .PIAN APPROVAI (cA-105-85) PROPONENT: FIRST CITY EQUITIES PROJECT TITLE: PARKING LOT EXTENTION TO PHASE II -VALLEY OFFICE PARK. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF A 61 PARKING STALL EXTENTION TO PHASE II OF VALLEY OFFICE PARK. LOCATION: LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF POWELL AVENUE S.W. AT THE 1000 BLOCK. SITE AREA: 0.47 ACRE BUILDING AREA (gross): N/A IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS MINOR MAJOR MORE IMPACTCT IMPACT INFORMATION 1) Earth ! 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 1 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing ' I 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic) and Cultural Preservation 14) Transpoitation 15) Public Slervices 16) Utilities COMMENTS: ' I i 1 ' RECOMMENDATION: DNS Q MITIGATED DNS El EIS REVIEWED BY: TITLE: DATE: / 3 � FORM #14 REVISED 9/10/85 _AVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW 6)-ItET s REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: 2 o N I AJ 6 DATE CIRCULATED: DECEMBER 30, 1985 COMMENTS DUE: JANUARY 9, :1986 ECF - 123 - 85 APPLICATION NO(s). SITE PIAN APPPOVAI (cA-105-85) PROPONENT: FIRST CITY EQUITIES PROJECT TITLE: PARKING LOT EXTENTION TO PHASE II -VALLEY OFFICE PARK. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF A 61 PARKING STALL EXTENTION TO PHASE II OF VALLEY OFFICE PARK. LOCATION: LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF POWELL AVENUE S.W. AT THE 1000 BLOCK. SITE AREA: 0.47 ACRE BUILDING AREA (gross): N/A IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS MINOR MAJOR MORE IMPACT IMPACT INFORMATION 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water ///) 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare \\) 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: S c YLL FAKKI(06 LLY1 4 (JI` O(U W I -Il I o "(1� cJ.--( t RAGG .R. ofas- 1K,u ci'i riu OF 0NV)t�Disik, I\y6,u6 16\0 C.,olv0 vv a ERt�ui iz,. E 3 D n mtG -tIor� u I E1� �� 26, FIS I ) • RECOMMENDATION: X DNS Q MITIGATED DNS n EIS REVIEWED BY: J C 140( TITLE: DATE: 1 ✓ 5 -8(0 FORM #14 REVISED 9/10/85 cdVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: ?OLiC & DATE CIRCULATED: DECEMBER 30, 1985 COMMENTS DUE: JANUARY 9, 1986 ECF - 123 - 85 APPLICATION NO(s). STTF PIAN APPROVAI (cA-105-85) PROPONENT: FIRST CITY EQUITIES PROJECT TITLE: PARKING LOT EXTENTION TO PHASE II -VALLEY OFFICE PARK. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF A 61 PARKING STALL EXTENTION TO PHASE II OF VALLEY OFFICE PARK. LOCATION: LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF POWELL AVENUE S.W. AT THE 1000 BLOCK. SITE AREA: 10.47 ACRE BUILDING AREA (gross): N/A IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS MINOR MAJOR MORE IMPACT IMPACT INFORMATION 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health , 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing , 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: i RECOMMENDATION: c DNS Q MITIGATED DNS 11 EIS REVIEWED BYE Gift TITLE: DATE: / —� FORM #14 REVISED 9/10/85 _.VVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW , n ET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: -V--h' e „S DATE CIRCULATED: DECEMBER 30, 1985 COMMENTS DUE: JANUARY 9. 1986 ECF - 123 - 85 APPLICATION NO(s). STTF .PIAN APPR(IUAI, (SA-105-85) PROPONENT: FIRST CITY EQUITIES PROJECT TITLE: PARKING LOT EXTENTION TO PHASE II -VALLEY OFFICE PARK. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF A 61 PARKING STALL EXTENTION TO PHASE II OF VALLEY OFFICE PARK. LOCATION: LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF POWELL AVENUE S.W. AT THE 1000 BLOCK. SITE AREA: 0.47 ACRE BUILDING AREA (gross): N/A IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS MINOR MAJOR MORE IMPACT IMPACT INFORMATION 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: RECOMMENDATION: DNS EJ MITIGATED DNS n EIS REVIEWED BY: 9*(a)/(16A TITLE: h?/ '(l� DATE: 344 I () 85 FORM #14 REVISED 9/10/85 _ -4IVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: iIF: F (C' DATE CIRCULATED: DECEMBER 30. 1985 COMMENTS DUE: JANUARY 9. 1986 ECF - 123 - 85 APPLICATION NO(s). STTF .PIAN APPROVAL (cA-105-85) PROPONENT: FIRST CITY EQUITIES PROJECT TITLE: PARKING LOT EXTENTION TO PHASE II -VALLEY OFFICE PARK. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF A 61 PARKING STALL EXTENTION TO PHASE II OF VALLEY OFFICE PARK. LOCATION: LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF POWELL AVENUE S.W. AT THE 1000 BLOCK. SITE AREA: 0.47 ACRE BUILDING AREA (gross): N/A IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS MINOR MAJOR MORE IMPACT IMPACT INFORMATION 1) Earth r_ 2) Air 3) Water ' G 4) Plants 5) Animals �--- 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 4 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 1 r 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation �J 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities _ COMMENTS: RECOMMENDATION: DNS E] MITIGATED DNS f( EIS REVIEWED BY: DATE: ! _) � BL. FORM #14 REVISED 9/10/85 , ' e i L VIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: T e.S I 6 1) DATE CIRCULATED: DECEMBER 30, 1985 COMMENTS DUE: JANUARY 9, 1986 ECF - 123 - 85 APPLICATION NO(s). STTF PIAN APPROVAI (SA-105-85) PROPONENT: FIRST CITY EQUITIES PROJECT TITLE: PARKING LOT EXTENTION TO PHASE II -VALLEY OFFICE PARK. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF A 61 PARKING STALL EXTENTION TO PHASE II OF VALLEY OFFICE PARK. LOCATION: LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF POWELL AVENUE S.W. AT THE 1000 BLOCK. SITE AREA: 0.47 ACRE BUILDING AREA (gross): N/A IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS MINOR MAJOR MORE IMPACT IMPACT INFORMATION 1) Earth 2) Air L.," 3) Water 4."- 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources L/ 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing c,"- 10) Aesthetics 10.'- 11) Light and Glare 1 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation �' 14) Transportation �' 15) Public Services 16) Utilities i _ t--` COMMENTS: - • ppJs�, 1-5( c..f(- U�, (0-v 42, °f -n D r'zct`,. e.-c�us_s 7�-�e 7) J Pa dc� C -r srr:&, Po. PrI , 10 1( RECOMMENDATION: /,p771 D ElMITIGATED DNS piEIS REVIEWED BY: TITLE: e7467, p 6, DATE: / a./3 r/2.5 FORM #14 REVISED 9/10/85 CITY OF RENTON ....JIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW Sn«'i f A N 2 1986 _ �/�y� POLICY REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: P© I C._ L{+ ��_ ( G C./GIP/ 6A� FI QPDAENT DATE CIRCULATED: DECEMBER 30. 1985 COMMENTS DUE: JANUARY 9, 1986 ECF - 123 - 85 APPLICATION NO(s). STTF PI AN APPROVAI (SA-105-85) PROPONENT: FIRST CITY EQUITIES PROJECT TITLE: PARKING LOT ,EXTENTION TO PHASE II -VALLEY OFFICE PARK. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF A 61 PARKING STALL EXTENTION TO PHASE II OF VALLEY OFFICE PARK. LOCATION: LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF POWELL AVENUE S.W. AT THE 1000 BLOCK. SITE AREA: 0.47 ACRE BUILDING AREA (gross): N/A IMPACT REVIEWION ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS MINOR MAJOR MORE IMPACT IMPACT INFORMATION 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities _ COMMENTS: RECOMMENDATION: DNS Q MITIGATED DNS 1 EIS REVIEWED BY: c57ccre. 12nso11 _ TITLE: 7SS(.2104 P/ac�vve./--- DATE: 11-71ec. FORM ##14 REVISED 9/10/85 -1,7,4,t77;;;;, ,L , ,.,, . • , -',.",,,,,,,,,,,` 1----, ,,.0.1:, '',, h ',„', . , , ,of. R.4., ' ' ',- . ' .1. ,INAL v '• k" .,.. .1,.:,',,,, : ./,',,f;''''',' . .. • .. , 1 " t,r „ ,, 91)04 ;,. '4,,. . ,,''4,1 . '• 4 . P , , l'eb sEriolS. ,Cit ' of Renton Land Use Heariiiii Examiner . ;.,•L'4.,' -.' , ' will hold a 4-'c'.::".' •'.-:`,1 .•-'', *cio, ,1 . ' k• ; '' ,,,f, , `,"4 I - '," ,,,.3„ ..; ,' i tt No. , ',":‘,„,", .,,' ,l''' tq: "; ' " t ; - --',, 1,`A ,t ,:1k,', 1-0- -h.; ,-0 - ,., 4,k' -1..„, ,- ,,.: -, k, r,,',-' t,,,'• '',' ,r-,,,.. k ,, ", , ir4;'',11','': ' -"i! ' ' k :. ',.:,, ',..-:,,,. ,,• k li, .1.,..r• -V ', , ' o !,,, , .,, ., iVt 4..::,„, • 4-.,, ".,/,,:4 te,;',."-,...,i", t,t,,,, .-f„..,,,, Te,-, ,,,-, ' "-P' '' ! ,,,,,, ,,,. „ ,_., .„ ,,, ,,,,., ..,,,.7 , 1 ; 1“") *',,,:,,-,lit•V P!'' *tfr''''.,!.,,,'4'r7 , tY11 1 i VV CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS , CITyvHALL ON FEBRUARY 4.,,1986 ' ', , , , , , BEGINNING AT 9.410 , A.i'M' G , P.M. , . - CO , . .0. ,,i.'Oikl= . E REZ•II III nom , From , , , To , ‘.„),,,.., . sig .,.„ ' ,USE PE lir. M IT , C... M14 4, , ' ' ,t, 111, , 1 ,r , .N '1)- ..... ,,.. ,... .... . , u , , . x SITE PR OVALVA SA-105-85 ., ip. . ,..,,, H',...;: ....,*IT ,::,..„LA 0 /Su ,i;.,, DIVIS1„0„ la ANi.' os, 111:w 1 Lot's I i - ,„",. PL,f-:., t ,, ,„.E 4F,, UN! E T Ao EVEL0,- 11/11MN I ' .. ., .\,•,. _.,.., ,A *,, ,4 ,..v. tt, i'l V'' I Rid, .,,k '''1"CE i. 0. , • . , '“ GEPJER A , L LOC '#,I.,T110N ANO/CIR :ADDRESS: z r .. I L.I,c 1 ' ...'' Si ' lieu LOCAIED ONAVETHE:WEST SIDE OF POWELL , S,,W." AT.THE, .'44 BLOCK ' '','' -.. l'.. '. - - LEGAL DESCRIPTION ON FILE IN THE RENTON BUILDING ai, F NING DEPARTMENT. ENVI., 'lir: MENTAL DECii. -"R ATION 1-- , - . 0 .-- 1GNIFICANT ONON-4•81 NIFICANT„ , , . FOR FLIFITHIErt SINIFOIRMATICINI CALL , THU clrrhy. Cr ,' FliE NTC)N : : i BUILDINCII Si ZONIPtiG DEPARTMENT 7, L35-2550 '4 .:,-: ,.'' ,, I ' , - • , :, "''''''CI 34r ',t i" 4, ,, , .A,t,f '.4;, WITHOUT THIS 'Nrii %. lidE:NOT, - , TO BE REM ET4 ' 164 - , , . ,-, PROPER AU HOR1 ,...- . . OF R4 4, ,?1 t$ ° BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR Z o n0,9 co� MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 • 235-2540 0,9gT�D SEP-1. -`# BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR MEMORANDUM DATE: January 14, 1986 TO: Files (All Holvick, deRegt and Koering (HDK) and First City Equity Files) FROM:( 9 er J. Blaylock, Zoning Administrator SUBJECT: DEVELOPMENT OF TRACT 'B' OF SPRINGBROOK TECHNICAL CENTER The ERC conditions at the time of plat approval required the dedication and construction of Oakesdale Avenue (2 lanes) along the west side of Tract 'B' from S.W. Seventh Street to S.W. Grady Way prior to the development of Tract 'B'. Development of the parcels adjacent to Tract 'B' by First City Equities and Holvick, deRegt and Koering (HDK) have been short of parking spaces on existing lots. In order to accommodate proposed parking, lot line adjustments have been approved in which a portion of Tract 'B' is added to the adjacent lots. These lot line adjustments for parking lot areas raised the question of whether Oakesdale needed to be constructed. On October 30, 1985, the ERC upon review of a new traffic analysis determined that "... parking lots can be constructed on Parcel B without the implementation of the condition to construct Oakesdale Avenue. This interpretation does not include the construction of any buildings." RJB:JSM:ss 2156Z OF R4,4 �y � � 0 BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT z RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR 09 �{ ' � MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 o -235-2540 0941 r6D SEPT—M��P BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR January 24, 1986 Barbara Moss, Director of Planning First City Equities 800 Fifth Avenue, Suite 4170 Seattle, Washington 98104 RE: FIRST CITY EQUITIES (VALLEY OFFICE PARK) Application for site plan approval to allow the construction of a parking lot extension containting 61 parking stalls as part of Phase II of the Valley Office Park, file SA-105-85; property located on the west site of Powell Avenue S.W. at the 1000 block. Dear Ms. Moss: The City of Renton Building and Zoning Department formally accepted the above mentioned application on December 27, 1985. A public hearing before the City of Renton Land Use Hearing Examiner has been scheduled for February 4, 1986. The public hearing commences at 9:00 a.m. in the Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall. The applicant or representative(s) of the applicant is required to be present at the public hearing. A copy of the staff report will be mailed to you before the hearing. If you have any questions, please call the Building and Zoning Department at 235-2550. Sincerely, thS Roger J. Blaylock - ` "'' Zoning Administrator RJB:JMM:ss 2191Z 1016N NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a declaration of non-significance for the following projects: CITY OF RENTON (LIBRARY) (ECF-122-85) Application for Substantial Shorelines Development Permit to allow building additions of 900 and 1,200 square feet and renovation of Main Library with parking lot improvements, file number SM-013-85; property located at 100 Mill Avenue South (over the Cedar River). FIRST CITY EQUITIES (VALLEY OFFICE PARK) (ECF-123-85) Application for site plan approval to allow the construction of a 61 parking stall extension to Phase II of Valley Office Park, file number SA-105-85; property located on the west side of Powell Avenue S.W. at the 1000 block. Further information regarding this action is available in the Building and Zoning Department, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington, 235-2550. Any appeal of ERC action must be filed with the Renton Hearing Examiner by February 3, 1986. Published: January 20, 1986 FORM 115 ENVIRONMENTAL , - DECLARATION APPLICATION NO. ECF-133-85, SA-105-85 PROPOSED ACTION APPI ICATION FOR SITF PLAN APPROVAI TO Al I OW THF. CONSTRUCTION OF A El PARKING STALL EXTENSION TO PHASE II OF VALLEY Y OFFICE PARK, GENERAL LOCATION AND OR ADDRESS PROPERTY IS LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF POWELL AVENUE S,W, AT THE 1000 BLOCK, POSTED TO ;NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE [ E.R.C. J HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION ❑DOES ®DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. AN ENVIRONMENTAL BMPACT STATEMENT • ®WILL C WILL NOT BE REQUIRED. THE CITY OF RENTON WILL NOT ACT ON THIS PROPOSAL FOR 15 DAYS FROM THE DATE BELOW. COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY •• AN APPEAL OF THE ABOVE DETERMINATION MAY BE FILED WITH THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER BY 5:00 P.M., FEBRUARY 1 3, 1986 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT 235-2550 DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION 1016N NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a declaration of non-significance for the following projects: CITY OF RENTON (LIBRARY) (ECF-122-85) Application for Substantial Shorelines Development Permit to allow building additions of 900 and 1,200 square feet and renovation of Main Library with parking lot improvements, file number SM-013-85; property located at 100 Mill Avenue South (over the Cedar River). FIRST CITY EQUITIES (VALLEY OFFICE PARK) (ECF-123-85) Application for site plan approval to allow the construction of a 61 parking stall extension to Phase II of Valley Office Park, file number SA-105-85; property located on the west side of Powell Avenue S.W. at the 1000 block. Further information regarding this action is available in the Building and Zoning Department, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington, 235-2550. Any appeal of ERC action must be filed with the Renton Hearing Examiner by February 3, 1986. Published: January 20, 1986 1015N CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST NO.: ECF-123-85 APPLICATION NO(s).: SA-105-85 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Application for site plan approval to allow the construction of a 61 parking stall' extension to Phase II of Valley Office Park. PROPONENT: First City Equities (Valley Office Park) LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Property located on the west side of Powell Avenue S.W. at the 1000 block. LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton, Building and Zoning Department. The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. There is no comment period for this DNS. Responsible Official: Environmental Review Committee City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055 Phone: 235-2550 APPEAL: You may appeal this determination in writing to Renton Hearing Examiner no later than February 3. 1986. You should be prepared to make specific factual objections. Contact City of Renton, Building and Zoning Department to read or ask about the procedures for SEPA appeals. DATE OF DECISION: January 15, 1986 PUBLICATION DATE: January 20, 1986 Ai, �'I •� it onald G. Nelson ry M. Sp in:L;r Building and Zoning Director Policy Develop•1=nt Dirl tor Ric and C. hton Public Works Director `SY... o ("TTY OF RFNTO�T FILE NO(S): -105-85 GS. Buii_DING & ZONING DEPARTMI T C/r°'(2.`2)- ♦ 6 ..0 'Cl/NIS MASTER APPLICATION , ;: • NOTE TO APPLICANT: Since this is a comprehensive application form, only those ' items related to your specific type of application(s) are to be completed. , • (Please print or type. Attach additional sheets if necessary.) APPLICANT TYPE OF APPLICATION • NAME • FEES First City Equities CD REZONE*(FROM - TO ) ADDRESS 800 5th Avenue, Suite 4170 0 SPECIAL PERMIT* 0 CITY ZIP TEMPORARY PERMIT* • Seattle, WA 98104 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT* _ VA SITE PLAN APPROVAL �� TELEPHONE am SPECIAL PERMIT FOR GRADE AND FILL (206) 624-9223 No. of Cubic Yards: CONTACT PERSON Q VARIANCE* From Section: * Justification Required NAME . Barbara E. Moss (Director of Planning) , ADDRESS SUBDIVISIONS: ' 800 5th Avenue, Suite 4170 Q SHORT PLAT CITY ZIP Q TENTATIVE PLAT Seattle, WA 98104 ED PRELIMINARY PLAT • TELEPHONE Q FINAL PLAT (206) 624-9223 WAIVER • (Justification Required) OWNER NO. OF LOTS: NAME PLAT NAME: First City Equities } ADDRESS PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: ' 800 5th Avenue Suite 4170 ED PRELIMINARY • CITY ZIP ED FINAL Seattle, WA 98104 P.U.D. NAME. TELEPHONE (206) 624-9223 0 Residential Q Industrial aCommercial Q Mixed LOCATION MOBILE HOME PARKS: PROPERTY ADDRESS • 0 TENTATIVE Powell Avenue SW ® PRELIMINARY EXISTING USE PRESENT ZONING Vacant MP FINAL PROPOSED USE PARK NAME: Parking. NUMBER OF SPACES.: pm ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE iln$(>G SQ. FT. ACRES - . �C� C20 AREA: 20,500 •47 TOTAL FEES m,,�,4 c�aTrj,N STAFF USE ONLY -- ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESSING _ DAT T N °i; 0 W. 1)-j APPLICATION RECEIVED BY: `'' ' APPLICATION DETERMINED TO BE: �.; ° °�'' L DEC 27 985 Accepted ., . D Incomplete Notification Sent O°rt -0 C e, .yt_ B11ILDING/zONING DEPT. ._ ° --° _. .u,_;aliitials) DATE ROUTED ADDITIONAL MATERIAL RECEIVED BY: 9i, °.....,.. ' •. ' /,.•/[.., ,,,,, AN-; \`. APPLICATION DETERMINED TO BE: ., 2- 5 O'- D Accepted EDIncomplete Notification Sent On By: (Initials) ROUTED TO• 1IBuilding tn. Design Eng. tEn Fire RNI Parks 10 Police Policy Dev. MI Traffic Eng. (s�_l Utilities ° REVISED 1-31-84 , • Legal description of property (if more space is required, attach a separate sheet). -See Attached.- : _ _ - - - G - ' • • � r - I I ✓ AFFIDAVIT Royce A. Berg , being duly sworn, declare that I am 'authorized representative to act for the property owner,=owner of the property involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answ rs herein contained and the information herewith,submitted are in all respects true and corr ct to the b of my owledge and belief. SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS • DAY OF u o i ze Repr e lye 19 %5 . Ro ce A. Berg NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR THE STATE OF LPN/Royce A. Berg Architects 114 Vine Street WASHINGTON, RESIDING AT Seattle, WA 98121 • (206) 728-5771 • (Name of Notary Public) v (Signature of Owner) (Address) (Address) • -1 - � - (City) (State). (Zip) (Telephone) p Acceptance of this application and required filing fee does not constitute a complete application. Plans and other materials required to constitute a complete application are listed in the "Application Procedure." I _ Form #174 LEGAL DESCRIPTION That portion of Lot 11 , Washington Technical Center, as recorded in Volume 122 of plats, Pages 98 through 102, records of King County, Washington, Described as Lot 2, City of Renton Lot Line Adjustment No. L.L.A. 008-84, filed under Recorder' s No. 8409179003, records of said county, together with that portion of Lot 12, said Washington Technical Center, described as Lot 2, City of Renton Lot Line Adjustment No. L.L.A. 004-83, filed under Recorder's No. 8309309001 , records of said county, and that portion of Tract B, said Washington Technical Center described as follows: Beginning at a point on the west line of said Tract 11 which is south 1°14'28" west along said west line 176.00 feet from the northwest corner of said Tract 11 ; thence north 88°45'32" west 59.00 feet; thence south 1°14'28" west 347.61 feet to the north line of Lot 3, said City of Renton Lot Line Adjustment No. L.L.A. 004-83; thence north 77°27'27" east along the north line thereof 75.47 feet to the easterly line of said Tract B; thence north 12°32'30" west along said easterly line 60.00 feet; thence north 1 °14' 28" east along said easterly line 271.36 feet to beginning. ; Valley 405 Business Park Phase II Parking Extension o _ CB Y OF REN T ON -- . 0 DEC 27 1985 6UtLPINGlz'QNtN. ocrr. F . , R� j, ECF: kCP I2,(2j Y *4 p z City of Renton 2 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST 094T�D SEPlE°�Q Purpose of Checklist: The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43,21 C RCW, requires all governmental agencies tb consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for allproposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality. of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. Instructions for Applicants: - This environmental checklist. asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, 'you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply." Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional • information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impacts. Use of Checklist for Nonproject Proposals: (Please Type or Print Legibly) Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D). For nonproject actions (actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs), the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. A. BACKGROUND Valley 405 Business Park 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Phase II Parking Extension (Earlington Industrial Park) 2. Name of applicant: First City Equities 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Ms. Barbara Moss First City Equities 800 5th Avenue, Suite 4170 Seattle, WA 98104 (206) 624-9223 4. Date checklist prepared: December 23, 1985. 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Renton Building & Zoning 6. Proposed timing or schedule '(including phasing, if applicable): Construction - Spring, 1986 an'OF RENTON [E '-' DEC 27 1985 `.,..w.. BUILOING/ZONJ., D : T 2;. •1. ` Do you have, any ply; For future additions, expansions, c irther activity related to or connected with s proposal? if yes, explain. - / , Possible landscape and parking extension towards Grady Way on Puget Power • Residual Property with rezone of Puget Power property to match this property. B. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. Original E.I.S.. for total project for Earlington Park by R.W. Thorpe & Associates for First City Equities and City of Renton, February, 1981 . Environmental Checklist for 3 Story Office Building, City of Renton, submitted u ybu k 195.n 9. uo whether applications are pending for governmental ap provals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. None. 10. List any governmental approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. . City -of Renton Building Permit and Site Plan Approval 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. 'Extension of parking and landscaping of parcel of land to the *west of an office building presently under construction owned by same property owner. . 12. Location of the proposal: Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topography map, if reasonably available. While ,you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps o detailed plans -submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. Located in an existing area of development adjacent similar projects off Powell Avenue Southwest and north of Southwest Tenth Street in Renton, Washington (North of Interstate 405 & Grady Way). B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. EARTH a. General description of the site (circle one); flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other fl at . b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? 1/2% - except small area of fill at SE section. c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, caly, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. Sand, silt and gravel at lower levels. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. No. • - 2 - , e. Describe ti urpose, type, and approximate q ities of any filling or grading.pro. -d. Indicate source of fill. Rework existing material on site and add base course and asphalt. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. Site is flat, minor erosion of surface could occur on site. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? 90%. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: Siltation and erosion control per City Standards. . 2. AIR a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Normal emissions from dust, auto and truck equipment during construction. b. Are there any off-site sources of emission? No. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: • Water site to reduce dust. • 3. WATER a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. P-1 drainage channel less than 1/2 mile away. 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. No. • • 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would' be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. N/A - 3 - 1 • • • 4) Will the prof l require surface water withdravi or diversions? Give general descr _ m, purpose, and approximately qui______ies if known. • No. 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan.. Yes. Entire site lies within 100-year floorplain. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No. b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and appaoximately quantities if known. No. 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic Eanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic, sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals . . .; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. None. c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. Storm water into storm drainage system per City Standards and to detention area at P-1 channel . • 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. No. - 4 - • d. Proposed m ires to reduce or control surface, fund, and runoff water impacts, if any: Storm drain system with catch basins connected to storm drainage system. 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: o deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other o evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other X Shrubs X grass o crop or grain o Wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other o water plants: water lily, eel grass, milfoil, other o other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Clear and grub all existing grass. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: Grass lawn areas, combined with mix of Evergreen and deciduous trees and shrubs. 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed.on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: Birds: Hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other seagul 1 s, sparrows Mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other Fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. No. - 5 - • d. Proposed rr ires to preserve or enhance wildlif any: Addition of trees and landscaping. 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Use of electric power for lights. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: N/A • 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. No. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. N/A 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: N/A • b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? None. - 6 - r/..• • 2) What types i levals of noise would be created I' =r associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Construction noise from normal work hours 7-5 for a short term basis. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: None: noise not significant in relation to existing :adjacent uses. 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Undeveloped site with adjacent light industrial , office;, other undeveloped properties. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. No. • • c. Describe any structures on the site. None. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so. what? • No. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? MP f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? MO-0 g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? N/A h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. No. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? None, parking serves adjacent office structures. j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None. k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: N/A - 7 - " 1. Proposed ME 'es to ensure the proposal is come ble with existing and projected lariu uses and plans, if any: Use is campatible with adjacent, uses. 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate \ whether high, middle, or low-income housing. N/A b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. N/A c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: N/A 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed. N/A b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: • Landscape buffers to break up parking. 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? Light from parking lighting at night time. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No. c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None. • d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: Control light dispersion of pole lights. • - 8 - ., 12. Recreation ' a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? , None. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so. describe. No. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: None. 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. No. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. N/A c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: N/A • 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. Direct access to Grady Way which runs parallel with Interstate 405 with on/off ramps at Interurban to the west and Old Rainier Avenue to the east. b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximately distance to the nearest transit stop? Yes, approximately 3/4 mile. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? 242 stalls existing plus 61 additional stalls, total of 303 for-the 3 Story Office Building, none eliminated. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). No. - 9 - e. Will the proj use (or occur in the immediate v ty of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. No. f. -How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes) would occur. Peak volume at normal work hours per prior approval of building. See * below. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: I Proximity to bus line and other developments to incorporate car pooling and transit bus use. 15. Public Services • a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. Project will require normal fire protection and police protection already serving the area. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. None. 16. Utilities a. Circle utilities currently ,available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Electric power for light poles and water or landscape irrigation. C. SIGNATURE • I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. t is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non-s' ificance hat i might issue in. reliance upon this checklist should there be any illful epre tation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Proponent: Name Printed: oyce A. Berg/LPN chitects * Daily Trip Rate: 17.7 vehicle trips/1000 sq. ft. PM Peak Hour: 2.82 -vehicle trips/1000 sq. ft. • j. I ' - 10 - . I #176 11-8-84 Architecture and Planning --., Leason Pomeroy Northwest,Inc.,Royce A.Berg A.I.A.,114 Vine Street(2nd&Vine)Seattle,WA 98121(206)728-5771 TRANSMITTAL • TO: City of Renton DATE: December 27 , 1985 Dept . of Building & Zoning 200 Mill Avenue South PROJECT: Parking Extension Rendon', WA 98055 6, PROJECT NO: NW 85063 . ATTN: Mr. J e', ry Lind 11. RE: Site Plan Review Submittal NUMBER • . DESCRIPTION I. 6 Sets Arch . Site Plan (A-1 ) , Landscape Plan (L- 1) , and Civi " f • . Plan with Grading & Erosion Control I, 1 Set 11x8A- Reduced Plans of Above . 6 Copies Environmental Check List i 6 Copies Master Application with Affidavit of Ownership . 1 Site Approval & Environmental Checklist Review - Fee ($368, Check #11935 ) i REMARKS: Submi tt.al for Site P1 an Approval . P1 ease c.al l me ` if there : are any questions . - • . I , . I. HAND DELIVERED - 'I CITY OF RENTON RI BY: Y . Ken ; K. Chin . DEC 2r 1985 ....._.. cc. Barbara Moss , FCE Greg By l e r , FCE BUILDING/ZONING OPT, . . NDING oF .F1LE FILE TITLE • • . I