The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLUA85-106 + J EVERGREEN TREE STAKING DETAIL TREE STAKING DETAIL GENERAL NOTES / 1 ' M9 eLte9 ' a.tiL P:,tiNN/'C,¢.' SX:L .�/;: �'N^'G^ �JC ` O4�nG`/E9 �Mv: ve+. '''/1' nn'Jr-h rCL° tl / "l(Z�'. f. /�{%////' t O e — YLEE 1H ,, aa...-f_' .✓"1., -mc-'.g ��o A ice` /// 6..037S G/P'� � !roGY/i¢�J9 li :A�."�^ -GN. S-l1 N=l.-G wNlL /J[I \\-%b" .a Iai h 4.\-7t o �`0 /�YJ2N 91 9 G/NL:hSar.-/D.V.1,,0 M'C::i14`.. 0_- 6roV �Z� beerswr . / - g 9 6+ 1A,171M uV i - . ]x fti' T.VCa v�,17 LaKiNb ,..' ‘ Aar \ ,\\ 01 V "YEA"4:5,4,1.1-. SW.,"'/RD YN•Y.0 -G,<.G•G 004,701:7,‘ \<.\ NW "7 \ \ \ , - �� ,9mwV C4FeAv�/!:CIti�W./3 W a'1�G\...a,ea E \ /�yp'/•�1 \ 0 TR M✓ r. A s 195z,b Ui4RaY .4,, L.,,,c 1 X tr (INNS SYL✓ES7¢'3 S:OY.S.tE L-G"' '• te ► cra4,/s'an-..z+ :mmv cE.,w r-e' rS.,� .`1,� ,..,• � ` \� \ :N } z v. Ce11^4,,,,,V.VS.427/`c- V5/S.° '/Yew CF e M/N r ee�-1,:.2c9\ \ ' '- Z 2 .660 A¢s lLe u✓Px'cc,,,,,, srn-.n.ec r.-n s.�+L ,,'„>/.v 's @ • ./,,,• �/ // ► a COD ',A':W A P/4+ //,5'ohvH ?�L 9 M/N 'J� /�•� ' _I — Q _ N co.R, /1,7,-c z�w/L�4^.v+.'+W PoSE.e-r,,,,,5 5+L ?-H/N. if \/\ /� =` ' /— 0CbR9 fYCGC 5v0'�N. ..A �G"MN. , \ \ .`A'• II �/� C1p,1 R,-GCC <i"p4CW a�� a�_ >'c3 r va9--;e � V/ W �' r,,,A"3'c OITO Luy c.,/ont,,/r NLAur4..2/"H, 2 L'oc, ,.FATS\ , \f••eI -� Ali — _ —r _ U GEO tGQ/' ' Yr e/9°G C'..'S,CT a.'HW. 9 /6.. 1+/ - _-0 . \ \/e I- O Ca, n us .au.:o/�uwz+Mu„or a bti \\ \ A" II CC A-:,fA ,.,.o P/Nr.!ccrvl_,,,,,kw,cv 4.0,G, b+<. ,.9 si aiit �.i" 1I.— ra�c�.,..uX aW'/0+.:.1C./vY o'rOl9�9"O.G. T\\ \\ l ±., \ ) \" -/ aInk I /) !o>SA91✓4 O"r2 t.�/1 A51' /CAL :"O.G. ��/� -• ,s9 's14'� (/ V Itt A‘ AlSHRUB PLANTING DETAIL r' _�a//► _ +.. '_ I III I I O ' "Cie %Oen. WiLr {LAYER b+4/N , M• \ \✓ ,_\ _-.43 / \//:= a-,,�./R3 >R..2'0 O fr. N1E11 —j 1 J Vi- A�„�� \ \\ '.\\ r \)i4ff ` / --CI . S>fYT^ ../e3 '�'4,- 5 .i,.lag , •• \ � j/` 7�" tea .•. d� 1111 yit Cp\ 'd SRc,,R9 '„,,,9,f, ...R; i. \`C> j Rom' . . 1 1 1 1 ,111 1 III 1 I 11 l I l l 1 1 1 I __ ER.,.,=�a� (\\I y" ___ .vim. 3�i ® sr- �;� ;+ t _ -'- KLA e L-1 �1---!SITE PLAN _ ''! r 'c 0.4 —_—:1; :_, _ sr-lit.., _ _ ___ - .. _ - pFuu�SiWAfllO north 5W 3,. 57/E T • • : . . . 1,. ', 4. 4, ,' \\i/r ,...> • / . V \ . ,,. Ti .‘,\ ., . .. ,../ . \ 3 7, .. , i:•,., . , . ., :2,,, , , • ,... .• .,.,„ „ .. /7, . . '...'s \, •... ,„,,,,.. , 1 i• . , • .).- g • Z I- . - - , . . ' "-:•. \ • . .\\\ , ,. ..? . . ‘ ) .... ..., - . . , //''''' s .' . , ... / . ''' ', TA.• ST.,.,a,...,e-e t.....y. \. \ \ \ \• \\\ ,.•\: \ . ._ , ,, / \\ i 0 x,..."‘ -I-I-LL , „,F,_,„_ _ \' . IX \ \ )' F- / ,,,. ,/,, \ - • ''''• 4' \\\\ \\‘' (4-:..-1` '4'..`1" • r-,--1.1 ) LLI .////:' • e . :., . ',' '.7 7%.... . \\ \,) \\ \ - \ \ %. ;\\ \ . _ _ . I I_ _ STATI -TIO.S LLI Z cc LLi / (_/,', •• • ' •;•t° ' / •. . `•• `/ A `i, ,. •• \ '`' . • \\ / \\\ \\ ... • ,-/-7-1 .•-•,..-4•••......... g Ca /\ •..i/' \"//:, . Y. . 7, ‘7'.. A ', \ ...9 • \ ...,. \ / \\ i,.'' I ) ,.."1.1t-41.74::,.i.,Z,V.:• T...,,,,I. . ..i.. / z•'. J \ k''' /1 ,. \ _ A . 7 / . il -• - : ... .1,., •. f'' AAS -;S7) . • <1 A A' . .4.. /— .r• y : , ••. i ' 1`l'i'I t t it•P`°- t',"-' •,'•t •••:.• „,.--,7„, I 50,...-,.,,-••••••oct. . i .v.L I __I.L, I .. ,r`"'•,..,K r_ _ . m .1 :;I 1 1 [., -'1‘I.r '6'„1 I I I I I \ iTi - -41, - - - ,_.• _ _ -.T.1 ,-, -14r-- :i, Tr 1 I 11 I I I II 11 . Z .. I .S.t4. b.1-rci. STR...ET A 11 . . 9 G o O . .,o a e5 Q { • ! 1 ' III II n III III I III I ll' $ Z 2 Q z II a. (ij V v.'''. d'_ Qoor� r s ti V o fn -K�psna> '"-vrrn U -- —.Yr'n•+reo -=3 --T..,— O r r j - L I � � 1 I l ' i I i I I ° I I : I I I ! I I I 1 1 I I ► i i I ., . 1 I _� L°- 1 I t - [ 1 — t W • 1 ; �—= s i , . I I L_ I I . o F. m oU-(H ELEv T l o�+.r+er o-ra+*e. F. d . o Q LL • . • , _______ . - --- -- .. I I i l 1 I I1 . ____. 1, 4,4 . • q *-7. , 1�_1 i :i i i � I i i I . . .. y.g M . ' ILL _ ". 9 WE T GLEva.Tla-' • 1 ' ; II ' iIII I ; = ii � _ I =_ i klog.T-F E L v.>Tio.J A6 . ? ili,a,47 —'0.1.4.1L T..leo a.Lop i...[LOA. • _ .. (sue - .' Ti1 i • I I -- I ' ='.,r+.+e�,.." - we.T. II ML.cve.T 10 6-1- eL,1a=1.+a o 1 02 T Svn -n P�;er . , I o 4� oS 0. S , h S , S , ___ __ 5 5 5 5 5 a ' O • _— 1 5 Q z V z • b S 5 I -` • 5 h , , 0 h > . 5 C.) 5 5 • S S • h dy S 5 s . • 5 a ILI 1 6.sT a Llevf.T l0 146..6o6.4 e W NJ .41,...l4 ,. 0 5 m LL O. . . • amp '. �Q4: cli) o e @ co 0 0 Q.). . : *.r,.. ,,,......- ,...o. 56..a; ..e..... 1 1 -_ .---1--./-' 1.-__/ - -, - .It' . . L---4 ' 1-1. • ' I — - -. I .!.:. • . _ A ..,:: - • . . ;_.......• ---I---I ----. NI. t ..- 0 . ,,,,,.,....,,, ':::''''... _ . if,: a a •r.2.; . ... .''. •'. 1.7............,...., _ 1 ' "."...'i ''j'T.:'-.7 '' .t. .. • '''' -' ... • — ,t, i,÷: ,1--F-: !1! ---;-.-- '1; ,, .„ r 1 ..,-. S . .,. , .....i. .•- li :'- € 251, Oil . r> '7.7 e""-- -',„,-•"' -— ...Lt.',-- 1,• 'o:a ie.., . g '.°."..'"-• .1..? ,...-,.- , id 4.7 I • ......::, 1§1 ,,,-f- .•I,- !-- ,.._ i ,,,.... „--- '''-- 1 ,F mi m -•,,,,..1,. , : ,,I..4.4, Ila o.....ice. I I '• :P ... Fx. .13 '1 .I. :1_,IIIII •• II _ 2 != . 0 i,..iii- -----m---! •• -3.i = I .. it: .Q IMEri 1 In.i'-'• • ''‘1''Xr•`'''''''' ."s :,,,,i: JI,PN • 'I l'-- 104 Mvo..“....w.,./ ,,,,.,a „• If: ...e'en•-re........ i . (..) i 11 1 cc. a L. Th,* 0 a I ® 0 1._ .-4,- 1 9 I ' T7- . . C..)UJ ..,. 741.- k.lk 1:9 ; "...=Le.....7-''' '''' . . 'tt-- 1- i , = Z UJ • Vs- :,) ...._. _ ' . ._, •••1 --a . 1 1 ... . WALL i_. .5rE.,--irD a R our-4 o F Le,e7i . PLALl .... .4;a,o...3:...-.,ar...a . . ,,,,., ,...,.,....... ..,"Lq„,eV...,.b,....,, s= ....¢.....r.N..,...,.1.'..n..,t'Ar•-,..T.s.t..a> .414 e,,Li. L.,,..,a, I 0 , UIL_DI.-.1c.,I0 , Alt . L1,L0i1-141 .1 .. .. , III/ •Alib•-r,L11{-01,-IG IT. • . 1 in 1 g AA. • . . . . .. . . • .. , • • I. . . . A2 . , . M. • . \.. . . c? • e 6 ,_,.. 5 S . (7,9 i 1 I , , . , , . , ------ a ._ ... ., III ,.,. A ... . 1 ' ' . [. -----t- - • , I . .' s € • 11 . ! ---i , II I. I . . . ; € ,• ,.. . 1 , G ... . ..__., . 1 .1--- i' 1 1 ! i {I _ . 01 1 r .., • I \ id -- i • 0 , . 1 _ILL' I'-'' r''''''I- ' ' - '1'il..1 i 1 . • • 0 ittgi . 2 1 -.. . f k 4, ri- ,k, 191101.1 '1)_ 05 -1_i n i r -- . • ,-. . -] I. 1 ... __ 15 -5, • .- ± . . • ± . . L •- - I :-..:.1 -1 - . . .. .. . . • I ' 1 _ . • CI • 1 FACILITY FOR Office and Warehouse Properties,bac. . : Mg 201 hid*Avenue W.,Sffie MO . • BOEING ELECTRONICS COMPANY Seattle.Wffiffippom 98119 ........ Telephone QOM al.= • I RENTON,WASHINGTON •••• . . ... ... • . . -• . , • E „,..• ,.., ,..,.." ,.,..• „..,,. I*- f ,.,....,...,.., . I ::,......,..: ..........., _,.,„.0., I . ; — - .=, „ r -I- - _4 r r_--...r - - t— • :: .1° ' . - --.( -I- --- ---t L__ r___i I .. ] ‘,...u. , . a.....1...Hes . I /:: . .1 • N r - .,..s C ! 1 i 1 1 * 1I '4) AA ' :AO . .--- . ea ..o , I> 11•32•1=7.611 rm iffitil :, I -4 El -: L,1,7.----1AN ::,; A a 14: /a. A.so...r.r, ! --4-, •%. .: Fie—NO :e::-•.1,- 1 1 . • { -CI O.-4-0, -'• ,.... -N... i. ..., 1 ti 0 ,,,..—'_ :.g....1. 0 2 EL. i_.:!' I. 21, G.,.....e.0 . I ''''' ° NZ—M L j- l'• ,, L_______J 'le...c...4.... 1.....,:o. ,.......el ...t, 1 1 )..i:2:9 ). 6 2 l— e,0........1_.._ •'q < z En 1 •*--(1r=T , * ; 11 i-r• I 4-—11' 1 . I 1 r • 0 cc i_ __, ...............-......Jiwasm....V.,........c •1..... coo......101,Pr...t........••• . ‘711''•Eil:.137't.rr'1 . •• I rI .=1 /-4‘{(1*- F -s1 -Ii (5 - Q1— ,---v. • — .! z • . -„ . a L,.. ,---. Q' '- I L_-'•-_il I _ --=,--(9 ,- ea • ...1 I a il • • . . . •.: .. . s ,,,,,._10 Ft.-0Og. r.L.4.1-1 ,, • e : • . • . ...; g .. ... . • '.r, • •.4,.. rL.I,L.011,,-1G1 1,, • .••. . ill!• • _f5U1.-01,-.... 12- . II..1 A NI ig . . • . . . . . . . . I • • . . A a . , . 1003N C. ' i NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTON i i The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a declaration of non-significance i for the following project: i FANCHER FLYWAYS (ECF 121 85) i Application for conditional use permit to allow the construction of two aircraft hangar buildings having approximately 6,720 square feet and 4.500 square feet respectively to house 7 aircraft in a P-1 zoned district, file number CU-103-85; property located at 243 West Perimeter Road on the Renton Municipal Airport. The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a declaration of non-significance for the following projects with additional conditions imposed as mitigating measures under their authority of Section 4-2822(D) of the Renton Municipal Code: BRYANT MOTORS. INC (ECF 104 85) Application to rezone 8,240 square feet of property from R-1, Single Family • Residential, to B-1, Business Use, file number R-079-85, property located 125 and 125 Meadow Avenue North; and application for variance from Section 4-711(D)(6) to allow a reduction of required landscaping along Meadow Avenue North and North Second Street from 10 feet to 3 feet, file number V-102-85. • ORILLIA PROPERTY ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP ECF-119-85 Application for site plan approval to allow the construction of three, two-story office buildings totaling 178,605 square feet on an 11.74 acre site, file number SA-100-85; property located at the northwest corner of Lind Avenue S.W. and S.W. 39th Street. 1 ORILLIA PROPERTY ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP ECF-124-85 Application for site plan approval '" totaling 153,300 square feet of office allow on the constructione 10.48 acresf toof pbuildings pey, ,; file number SA-106-85; property located on the north side of S.W. 39th i Street at the 800 block. Further information regarding this action is available in g g Department, Municipal Building, Renton, the Building and Zoning action must be filed with the Renton Hearing Examiner nby2January 27, 1986 appeal of ERC Published: January 13, 1986 BEGINNING OF FILE FILE TITLE • • • ,c 'I .4 a 5 MICROFILMED 4 411 NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE AFFIDAVIT OF PUELICATION The E viroonn NTON en al Review CN ommittee (ERC) has issued a declaration of non- significance for the following project: Audrey ,�@ d O l e , being first duly sworn on oath states that FANCHER FLYWAYS(ECF-121-85) he/she is the Chief Clerk of the owtheApplication nsor conditional use permit to allow construction of two aircraft hangar buildings having approximately 6,720 square feet and 4,500 square feet VALLEY NEWSPAPERS respectively to house 7 aircraft in a P-1 zoned district, file number CU-103-85; property located at 243 West Perimeter Daily News Journal, Daily Record Chronicle, Daily Globe News Road on the Renton Municipal Airport. The Environmental Review Committee Daily newspapers published six (6) times a week.That said newspapers (ERG) has issued a declaration of non- significance for the following projects with are legal newspapers and are now and have been for more than six additional conditions imposed as mitigat- months prior to the date of publication referred to,printed and published ing measures under their authority of Section 4-2822(D)of the Renton Municipal in the English language continually as daily newspapers in Kent, King Code: County, Washington. Valley Newspapers have been approved as legal BRYANT MOTORS, INC. (ECF-104-85) newspapers by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for Application to rezone 8,240 square feet of property from R-1, Single Family Rest- King County. dential,to B-1, Business Use,file number R-079-85, property located 125 and 125 Meadow Avenue North;and application for The notice in the exact form attached, was published in the Daily News variance from Section 4-711(D)(6)to allow a reduction of required landscaping along Journal__, Daily Record Chronicle % , Daily Globe News , (and Meadow Avenue North and North Second not in supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its Street from 10 feet to 3 feet,file number V- subscribers duringthe below stated period. The annexed notice a . ORILLIA PROPERTY ASSOCIATES, LI- t i on was published MITED PARTNERSHIP(ECF-119-85) Notice of Environmental LetP_rtni na Application for site plan approval to allow On Janua r; 13, 1986 R1313 the construction of three, two-story office buildings totaling 178,605 square feet on an 11.74 acre site,file number SA-100-85; property located at the northwest corner of Lind Avenue S.W. and S.W.39th Street. The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the ORILLIA PROPERTY ASSOCIATES, LI-1 .58 MITED PARTNERSHIP(ECF-124-85) sum of �" Application for site plan approval to allow the construction of two buildings totaling 153,300 square feet of office space on the 10.48 acres of property, file number SA- 106-85;ofS.W. property located on the lorthck.side of SW. 39th Street at the 800 block. Further information regarding this action is available in the Building and Zoning Subscribed and sworn to before me this 15th daof Jan 19 tab . Department, 235-2550.M3555l Building,Any aRppeal of Washington, Any appeal of ERC action must be filed with the Renton Hearing Examiner by January 27, 1986. /^ C/ Published in the Daily Record Chronicle January 13, 1986. R1313 Notar}yPublic for the State of Washington, residing at Federal Way, King County, Washington. VN#87 Revised 10,84 CITY _ g- tee- Z°; • :V t 5 ys f`r'1AR 1 8 1ggF (__/ r - its -DL- NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON HEARING EXAMINER RENTON, WASHINGTON A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER AT AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUN - AFFIDAVITCIL CHAMBERS ON THE SECOND FLOOR OF CITY HALL, RENTON, WASHINGTON ON JANUARY 28, 1986, lie J O i e AT 9:00 A.M. TO CONSIDER THE FOL- Audreybeing first duly sworn on oath states that LOWING PETITIONS: he/she is the Chief Clerk of the ORILLIA PROPERTY AS- SOCIATES,LIMITED PARTNERSHIP Application for site plan approval to allow the construction of three two- VALLEY NEWSPAPERS story office buildings totaling 178,605 square feet on an 11.74 acre site, file number 4 A-'t00085; located at the Daily News Journal, Daily Record Chronicle, Daily Globe News northweei corner of Und Avenue S.W. and S.W.39th Street. Daily newspapers published six (6) times a week. That said newspapers ORILLIA PROPERTY ASSOCIATES, are legal newspapers and are now and have been for more than six LIMITED PARTNERSHIP Application for site plan approval to months prior to the date of publication referred to,printed and published allow the construction of two buildings in the English language continually as daily newspapers in Kent, King totaling 153,300 square feet of office _ space on 10.48 acres of property,file County, Washington. Valley Newspapers have been approved as legal newspapers by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for SA-106-85; property located on the King County. north side of S.W.39th Street at the 800 block. Legal descriptions of the files noted The notice in the exact form attached, was published in the Daily News above are on file in the Renton Building and Zoning Department. Journal , Daily Record Chronicle A , Daily Globe News , (and ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID PRE- not in supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its PETITIONSTAT THEAR INVITED TO INE PP g Y SENT PUBLIC HEARING ON subscribers during the below stated period. The annexed notice a JANUARY 28, 1986, AT 9:00 A.M. TO EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS. Notice of Public t'_eari nG was published Ronald G. Nelson Januar, 17 , 1966 h1 18 Building and Zoning Director on Published in the Daily Record Chronicle January 17, 1986. R1318. The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of $29.70 Subscribed and sworn to before me this 22nd day of ,Tan 19 Bh Notai4 Public for the State of Washington, residing at Federal Way, CITY OF f;ENTC'I King County, Washington. VN#87 Revised 10/84 r ( 1 1 ,j1 �►� `APR 117.;88 BU!L DING/ZONING DE'T. 4111 OF R4, ®°S * ° BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT • ®® :remit z RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR Z MA `1 tip, o O aua } MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 o 235-2540 0,9q7S0 SEPIE ' BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR March 4. 1986 Douglas Gardner. Project Manager Berkley Structures, Inc. 201 Ellington Avenue West #407 Seattle. Washington 98119 RE: BUILDING 11/SA-106-85/HEARING EXAMINER CONDITIONS Dear Mr. Gardner: The Hearing Examiner in his approval of site plan. file SA-106-85, included four provisions; The implementation of those four provisions is under the authority of the Building and Zoning Department. It is our position that the following circumstances affect our department's implementation of those four conditions. 1. The Hearing Examiner required that "parking and aisle width shall be modified as generally demonstrated on exhibit #2. including the modification of turning radii. elimination of parking immediately north of building #11, and the provision of a "plaza" emergency drive across the rail line in the center of the site." The site plans as presently submitted by your firm complies with the intent of the first three provisions. However, the fourth issue of a "plaza" emergency drive across the rail line in the center of the site has not been addressed. This may be a result of the fact that you have provided adequate circulation and turning radii to the north by relocating the primary east-west drive through the site to connect into future building site #12. The plaza is still a requirement that the Hearing Examiner imposed. The site plan for building #11 should be made by your firm at this time to include the plaza. There is the possibility that you could increase the pedestrian corridors along the south side of the east-west access drive to create a "plaza" effect. 2. The Hearing Examiner also required that "the provision of a pedestrian easement from the cul-de-sac to the springbrook public right-of-way." - Douglas Gardner March 4, 1986 Page 2 The easement is already provided on the underlying plat. However, improvement of that easement was contemplated during the public hearing, and the Building and Zoning Department would interpret the provision to mean the actual construction of interconnection with the Springbrook public right-of-way. 3. The third provision the Hearing Examiner required was "the provision of one acre of recreational facilities near the southwest corner of the subject site." Your firm has shown the set aside area of one acre to meet the intent of this provision. However, setting aside does not specifically 'comply with the intent to provide "recreational facilities." Therefore, the Building and Zoning Department will require that a recreational plan showing the actual facilities to be installed be approved at the time of building permit issuance. Please be aware that these plans may be modified if you decide to redesign building #12. 4. The Hearing Examiner also required that "landscaping shall be provided in accordance with the language and conclusions 8 and 9 above." The Hearing Examiner was specifically pointing to the fact that the development should create a campus-like setting and heavy landscaping should be required around the perimeter that blends all of the facets from an aesthetic point of view. This item will be carefully evaluated by the City's landscape architect at the time of building plan approval. If you have any questions or concerns about the Zoning Division's official interpretation of the Hearing Examiner's report, please contact us immediately. Sincerely, 90 .1..)\-04: Rogeaylock Zoning Administrator RJB:ss 2256Z OF I �i ° BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT CO RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR 9 MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 • 235-2540 09g1- ED SEP'-r "( BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR March 3, 1986 Douglas N. Gardner, Project Manager Berkley Structures, inc. 201 Ellington Avenue West #407 Seattle, Washington 98119 RE: BECO/CLARIFICATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS Dear Mr. Gardner: The Environmental Review Committee met on Wednesday. February 26, 1986, and determined that the conditions that were originally implied on the Orillia Properties project for the BECO Company can be clarified as follows: 1. Environmental conditions concerning the payment of fees for traffic mitigation shall be in the form of a letter of credit issued to the City of Renton. 2. The traffic signal at S.W. 39th Street and Lind Avenue S.W. had previously been determined to be installed by September 1, 1986 under a previous negotiated agreement. A total of $100,000 can be credited for the construction of this signal. This amount does have to be included in the letter of credit, if construction plans are not approved for the traffic signal prior to issuance of a building permit. (Plans should be approved in the next 90 days to assure installation of the traffic signal by September 1, 1986. 3. Payment of traffic mitigation fees will be at the time of issuance of the building permit in the form of a letter of credit specifically applied to the trip generation for that building. The letter of credit will be open ended without a date of expiration. However, all off--site traffic mitigation shall be completed no later than March 1, 1987. 4. The Environmental Review Committee since it is waiting upon additional information to prioritize the necessary traffic improvements in the entire Green River Valley Planning Area as determined cannot prioritize at this time specific improvements the developer can accomplish in lieu of actual payment of fees. The Environmental Review Committee by September 1, 1986 will provide the developer with a prioritization schedule and a time schedule. Douglas N. Gardner March 3, 1986 Page 2 5. The Environmental Review Committee cannot commit to a position on whether refunds will be appropriate under the methodology established for the implementation of the necessary traffic improvements. It can only be assumed at this time that if the final calculations are less than $175 per vehicle trip then apOlication may be made for credit consideration. The Environmental Review Committee has taken the above positions based upon the methodology for implementing the necessary traffic improvements. This was the primary reason to require letters of credit instead of actual posting of cash deposits to the City treasury for the traffic impacts associated with the development. If you need additional clarification concerning the above positions, please contact Roger Blaylock, Zoning Administrator, at 235-2550. For the Environmental Review Committee, tcel fbc'CL Roger J. Blaylock Zoning Administrator RJB:ss 1054N • 2* OF R� � �� : z BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT o RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR 0 MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 • 235-2540 co- O4/Tf0 SEPZEQ BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR MEMORANDUM • DATE: February 13, 1986 TO: Fred J. Kaufman, Hearing Examiner FROM: Roger J. Blaylock, Zoning Administrator SUBJECT: ORILLIA PROPERTY ASSOCIATES/SA-106-85/RECONSIDERATION REQUEST OF CONDITION #3 • The Building and Zoning Department presented facts in the public hearing showing that on-site recreation should be provided in industrial and office park areas. The Building and Zoning Department believes that recreation should be provided but it can be provided by two different methods. The first would provide private recreation supporting only the immediate user, while the second option would be to provide public areas available to the entire neighborhood. The applicant, Orillia Property Associates, has met with the Parks and Recreation Department and the Building and Zoning Department to discuss the possibility of improving approximately two acres of public park adjacent to the site in lieu of providing one acre of recreational amenities on site. The City staff has encouraged both the Environmental Review Committee and the Hearing Examiner in the past to develop publicly-owned properties with private dollars if at all possible. Both departments see an advantage in improving the public park area at this time for the following reasons: (1) it would provide an amenity to all of the office and industrial workers in the area; (2) it is not tied solely to the one lot which could be sold individually and thus losing the recreational amenities for the other office buildings in the complex: and (3) it improves a public park without having to budget public dollars. The developer does receive an economic advantage in that he can build a larger building, but he also provides a public benefit in both financing and improving public use areas now. Fred J. Kaufman February 13. 1986 Page 2 The Building and Zoning Department has also consulted with the Policy Development Department in addition to the Parks and Recreation Department. and the three departments agree that where public lands are available recreational amenities could be transferred to those sites in lieu of providing on-site recreation. Therefore, we would recommend to the, Examiner serious consideration of the applicant's request to improve the public right-of-way with the approval of the Parks and Recreation Department on the final design for the landscaping treatment and the Public Works Department approval for the emergency access roadway system. RJB:ss 2228Z OF RA, ., Al ,`` : ° THE CITY OF RENTON `® Z MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 o BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR toLAND USE HEARING EXAMINER 9 co- A FRED J. KAUFMAN. 235—2593 091/ 0 SEP103 February 14, 1986 Mr. Doug Gardner Project Manager Berkley Structures, Inc. 201 Elliott Avenue W. #303 Seattle, Wa. 98119 Re: SA-100-85 and SA-106-85 Dear Mr. Gardner: I have reviewed your request and find that it cannot be considered as the information provided is untimely and it would appear to warrant or necessitate other changes to the Site Plan(s) which was approved - such matters as additional parking or a larger building, or both. Such matters simply cannot be considered in this manner. In addition, at the applicant's urging the matter could not be considered without extending the applicable appeal periods. This Office would nonetheless encourage the parties to work together and to coordinate efforts to combine and consolidate where possible and permissible the various recreational facilities to arrive at a first-class, quality recreational environment, not only for the tenants of the Orillia complex(es) but for the general population as well. There is nothing in either this Decision or the original Decision which stops the applicant from dedicating the property or recreational facility to the public and/or at least opening it up to the public. _ If this Office can be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, Q 1 - • 4LAA'N' FRED J. KAUFMAN HEARING EXAMINER FJK/dk • cc: Roger Blaylock, Zoning Administrator Parties of Record 4- • .I '"_ i; �::i 1.---TT;:1 T1- {ter ;z Y1;:' •1 i) rif Berkley Structures, Inc. 201 Elliott Ave.W#303°Seattle,Washington 98119 0 (206)281-8252 Err �*- $$��2,t '*-�-j j=�-t�:I _:-'4!:t+i_i.{ .i�-`:�1"I.�'ii . !i.i... :f..tl..i ' :.4....tii_.i:!.�..._it-I.__,ii_...-Tif±I.t±t 1{.:....; i.t_.i".. • Far?4 EC EV/ ER February 13, 1986 FEB 14 1986 City of Renton CITY OF RENTON Office of the Hearing Examiner HEARING EXAMINER 200 Mill Ave South Renton, Washington 98055 RE: SA-106-86 & SA-100-85 Attention: Hearing Examiner - Fred J. Kaufman Dear Mr. Kaufman; We request reconsideration of Condition #3 the provision requiring one acre recreational facilities near the southwest corner of the site. In lieu of this condition we would like you to consider the following improvement along the Springbrook Creek Greenbelt and Pedestrian Easement adjacent to lots 6, 7, and 8 from Oaksdale to S .W. 34th Street (Approximately 2, 00'0 Lineal Feet , 40 ° feet wide or 1 .83 acres ) by adding a 12 foot paved jogging lane, warm up station, landscaping, picnic tables and benches. In talking this subject over with Boeing, City of Renton, Departments of Zoning, Housing and Community and Park and Recreation, I believe they agree that this proposal meets the intent of Condition #3, and is in conformance with our original understanding of the recreational requirement. It is our understanding that this does not affect the appeal dates , if this is not the fact we will withdraw the reconsideration to avoid any delays. Thank you for your time,. if you have any questions please call 281-8252. Sincerely, /7 Dou Gardner Project Manager cc: Al Clow Mike Dunne Ed Heavey .OF R4,4, " ` ° BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT U RONALD G. NELSON — DIRECTOR----- Z • L c mum O MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 • 235-2540 90 co. 0,9F0 BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH ,d, r I E MAYOR MEMORANDUM FEB 141986 CITY OF RENTON HEARING EXAMINER DATE: February 13, 1986 TO: Fred J. Kaufman, Hearing Examiner FROM: Roger J. Blaylock, Zoning Administrator SUBJECT: ORILLIA PROPERTY ASSOCIATES/SA-106-85/RECONSIDERATION REQUEST OF CONDITION #3 The Building and Zoning Department presented facts in the public hearing showing that on-site recreation should be provided in industrial and office park areas. The Building and Zoning Department believes that recreation should be provided but it can be provided by two different methods. The first would provide private recreation supporting only the immediate user, while the second option would be to provide public areas available to the entire neighborhood. The applicant, Orillia Property Associates, has met with the Parks and Recreation - Department and the Building and Zoning Department to discuss the possibility of improving approximately two acres of public park adjacent to the site in lieu of providing one acre of recreational amenities on site. The City staff has encouraged both the Environmental Review Committee and the Hearing Examiner in the past to develop publicly-owned properties with private dollars if at all possible. Both departments see an advantage in improving the public park area at this time for the following reasons: (1) it would provide an amenity to all of the office and industrial workers in the area; (2) it is not tied solely to the one lot which could be sold individually and thus losing the recreational amenities for the other office buildings in the complex: and (3) it improves a public park without having to budget public dollars. The developer does receive an economic advantage in that he can build a larger building, but he also provides a public benefit in both financing and improving public use_ areas now. Fred J. Kaufman February 13, 1986 -- Page 2 The Building and Zoning Department has also consulted with the Policy Development Department in addition to. the Parks and Recreation Department, and the three departments agree that where public lands are available recreational amenities could be transferred to those sites in lieu of providing on-site recreation. Therefore, we would recommend to the Examiner serious consideration of the applicant's request to improve the public right-of-way with the approval of the Parks and Recreation Department on the final design for the landscaping treatment and the Public Works Department approval for the emergency access roadway system. RJB:ss 2228Z AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING STATE OF WASHINGTON ) )ss. County of King ) DOTTY KLINGMAN being first duly sworn, upon oath, deposes and states: That on the 5th day of February , 1986 , affiant deposited in the mails of the United States a sealed envelope containing a decision or recommendation with postage prepaid, addressed to the parties of record in the below entitled application or petition. SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this .5 T,r/ day of PF p i A--e y , 1986'.. ai- r Notary ublic in and for the State of Washington, residing at %RL -4 nJ , therein. Application, Petition, or Case #: SA-106-85 - ORRILIA PROPERTY ASSOCIATES (Boeing ) (The minutes contain a list of the parties of record.) 1171E February 5, 1986 OFFICE OF THE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND DECISION. APPLICANT: ORILLIA PROPERTY ASSOCIATES FILE NO. SA-106-86 LOCATION: North side of S.W. 39th Street at the 800 block. SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Approval of a Site Plan to allow the construction of two buildings totaling 153,300 square feet of office space on 10.48 acres of-property. SUMMARY OF ACTION: Building and Zoning Department Recommendation: Approval with conditions. Hearing Examiner Decision: Site Plan is approved with conditions. BUILDING & ZONING The Building & Zoning Department Report was DEPARTMENT REPORT: received by the Examiner on January 21, 1986. PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Building and Zoning Department Report, examining available information on file with the application, and field checking the property and surrounding area, the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: The hearing was opened on January 28, 1986, at 10:00 A.M. in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. The following exhibits were entered into the record: Exhibit #1 - Yellow file containing application, proof of publication and posting and other documents pertinent to this request. Exhibit #2 - Site Plan Exhibit #3 - Landscape Plan Exhibit #4 - by reference, Site Plan for SA-100-85. Exhibit #5 - by reference, Landscape Plan for SA-100-85. Exhibit #6 - by reference, yellow file for SA-100-85. • The hearing opened with a review of this request by the Zoning Administrator, Roger Blaylock. The applicant wishes to construct 2 buildings totalling 153,300 sq. ft. of office space on 10.48 acres. The property is designated as Manufacturing Park/Multiple Option on the Comprehensive Plan, and is unique in that the angle created along the northwestern boundary of the property is the alignment of Springbrook Creek and part of the storm water drainage facility for the area. This property is triangular in shape and provides access onto a public street on one side. Continuing, Mr. Blaylock advised there are adequate services provided to the area, with a major parking lot and landscaping currently being completed. The ERC review prompted the requirement of a traffic signal, on-site recreation to be provided along the east side of Springbrook Creek, and a 12 ft. wide asphalt trail capable of supporting emergency vehicles, which means an extension through the property along 34th Street on the north and 41st Street on the south. The site south of 39th Street is not in question at this time. Mr. Blaylock stated there is an estimate of approximately 1840 vehicle trips per day to be generated by these buildings, with the applicant contributing to area-wide improvements due to increased traffic. • Orillia Property Associate; SA-106-86 February 5, 1986 Page 2 • Staff feels this application is compatible with adjacent buildings, meets the goals and intent of the Comprehensive Plan with minor modifications for internal functions, and complies with the zoning ordinance of the City. Located in the middle of this site is a rail line which divides buildings 11 and 12. Access will be from S.W. 39th Street. Both' buildings have separate access. The rail line provides a design problem with regard to turning movements far emergency vehicles. It was proposed by staff that approximately 28 parking spaces be eliminated to provide for pedestrian access between the two buildings. As it is now, the east/west access, to be located on the north side of building #11, will have vehicles backing out directly into the aisleway along the south side of the building, and staff suggests that parking along the north side of the building be eliminated, with the applicant creating a separated internal traffic corridor to link through the adjacent site on the 'east to Lind Avenue S.W.. Mr. Blaylock stated the pedestrian circulation needs to be tied to the site plan to the west and pedestrian walkways that will tie into the trail system along Springbrook Creek. The public pedestrian walkway to be provided will probably always remain open which leads to the desire to have other outdoor recreation located adjacent to the walkway, with the entire area remaining unfenced. In conclusion, Mr. Blaylock stated staff recommends approval of this site plan, subject to the four conditions set out in the report to the Hearing Examiner. Calling for testimony in support of this proposal from the applicant or their representative, responding was: Edward Heavey 201 Elliott Avenue West, Suite 400 Seattle, Washington, 98119 Mr. Heavey addressed the parking as it relates to building 12 stating the north easterly 305 ft. of the lot containing building 12 is necessary for parking for the occupants of building 11. A lot line adjustment is to be processed which will include parking on both sides of the aisle closest to building 12. Mr. Heavey stated if the lot line adjustment creates a setback problem for building 12, that building will be moved slightly to the south. The railroad line is to be moved and the right-of-way is to be vacated, with that portion of the property becoming a part of the site plan. Mr. Heavey requested when that is accomplished that they be permitted to revise the site plan so the space can be utilized._ Mr. Heavey said Boeing Company will be utilizing Building 11 on June 1st and will be moving their facility from Kent to Renton. With this in mind, due to their building schedule, and previous delays, it was requested that the Hearing Examiner give consideration to rendering a Decision within a period less than the 14 day period provided by City Code. The Examiner stated he would take that request into consideration, and called for further testimony in support of, in opposition to,' or comments from staff. There was no one else wishing to speak. In the previous hearing this date for Orillia Property, SA-100-85, Bill Roach representing METRO made a plea for the coordination of effort between the developer, the tenant, the City of Renton and METRO to consider alternatives to traffic impacts, with consideration being given to transit and ridesharing to and" from the site. He requested that his comments be noted for this application also. There being no further testimony, the hearing was closed at 10:30 A.M. FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & DECISION:. For purposes of these Decisions and Recommendations the terms "Should" and "Shall" are to be considered mandatory. The term "May' will be considered discretionary. When the report is a recommendation to the City Council the terms "Should" and "Shall" are intended to inform the City Council that if they approve the recommendation the, items should be mandatory to preserve the,intent of the Decision. Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: 1. The applicant, Orillia Property Associates, Limited Partnership, for the Boeing Company, has requested approval of a site plan for 2 two-story buildings containing approximately 153,300 sq feet of office space. Orillia Property Associate SA-106-86 February 5, 1986 Page 3 2. The application file containing the application, the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) documentation, the Building and Zoning Department Report, and other pertinent documents was entered in the record as Exhibit #1. 3. Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and SEPA (RCW 43.21C, 1971, as amended), a Declaration of Non-Significance has been issued for the subject proposal by the Environmental Review Committee (ERC), the responsible official. 4. Plans for the proposal have been reviewed by all City departments affected by the impact of this proposal.' 5. The subject site is located on the north side of the S.W. 39th Street cul-de-sac, just west of Lind Avenue S.W. The site abuts Springbrook Creek. 6. The site was annexed into the City by the adoption of Ordinances 1745 and 1764 which were enacted by the Council in April and May of 1959, respectively. These were amended by the adoption of Ordinance 1928 in December, 1961. The subject site was rezoned to its current classification, M-P (Manufacturing Park) in December, 1969 by the adoption of Ordinance 2533. The site was filled under a special permit issued in November, 1975. 7. The map element of the Comprehensive Plan designates the site for the development of Manufacturing Park/Multiple Option uses, but does not mandate such development without exploring the goals and policies elements of the plan. 8. The applicant proposes developing on the 10.48 acre subject site 2 two- story buildings and parking for 921 autmobiles. 9. The buildings will be concrete tilt-up construction and will contain approximately 153,300 square feet of office space. 10. A railroad right-of-way which runs through the site parallels Springbrook Creek. The rail line and the creek both were utilized when the plat was prepared and therefore, the subject site, which is composed of two separate legal lots, is triangular in shape. Both the rail line and the creek cut a diagonal through this area of the Valley. 11. A number of conditions were placed upon the subject proposal by the ERC as part of the declaration of non-significance. Those conditions require participation in a variety of traffic related improvements including the installation of a traffic signal at Lind and 39th and the payment of a fee of not more than $175.00 per trip for an estimated 1,840 trips. The conditions also required the installation of an asphalt trail and other amenities along the Springbrook Creek, a dedicated public right-of-way immediately west of the subject site. 12. The subject site has been reviewed by staff in conjunction with other proposals to house various operations of the Boeing Company in the immediate area, including a proposal for the site immediately east, as well as those south of the subject site. These adjacent sites, particularly the easterly site, are integrally related to one another and staff reviewed them in that light. 13. The parking lots will function as extensions of one another with links between the two sites. A common dining facility will also be incorporated within one of the two sites. 14. The Boeing Company use of the site is expected to generate a substantial daily vehicle trip count, one in excess of that ordinarily generated by a comparable facility. Boeing typically utilizes floor space to provide a maximum return per employee. As a result, Boeing generally increases its parking requirement by about 20 percent and would generate almost as much additional traffic. • 15. As a result, the Transit arm of the Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle (METRO) has objected to the parking specifications of Boeing, and has requested that Boeing participate in constructive arrangements to reduce what is expected to be large traffic volumes confined to the Valley floor and to mitigate the Levels of Service (LOS) of E and F. "stop and go" and almost stalled traffic flow. • • ' Orillia Property Associate.. SA-106-86 February 5, 1986 Page 4 16. The proposal is expected to house approximately 1,110 to 1,300 employees. The adjoining complex is anticipated to employ a similar number of people. Based upon these numbers, staff has recommended, or imposed, the traffic related conditions already enumerated. Staff has also recommended measures to provide for the recreational needs of at least a segment of these employees. The recommendations include the pavement of the public right-of-way along Springbrook Creek, enhanced seating areas for lunchtime diversion and the incorporation of a 1 acre recreational area at the southwest corner of the site adjacent to the 39th Street cul-de-sac. Staff also recommended the connection through the site of a walkway from the public cul-de-sac to the Springbrook right-of-way. 17. While there will be two driveways with access to 39th from the site, the interior aisleways will continue more or less east/west across the eastern property line providing access through the easterly adjacent site. These links will provide additional access to 39th from the eastern site (SA-100-85), but in addition, will provide access through to Lind Avenue S.W. Staff therefore, recommended, and the applicant agreed, that parking north of proposed building 11 should be eliminated to avoid backing manuevers onto a major interior collector aisle. 18. The triangular shape of the combined parcels results in some of the parking aisles meeting at severely constrained (acute) angles which might interfere with emergency vehicle movements. The railroad alignment through the site also hampers emergency flow. Staff recommended a major crossing at right angles to the track, more or less centered over its length, along with the realignment of aisle intersections. 19. Staff also recommended carrying the interior pedestrian sidewalks through to the public sidewalks. 20. Depending upon security needs, staff was concerned that the site not take on the appearance of a fortification, and that any fencing be interior'to the peripheral landscaping, and thereby softened so the area appears like an office park. CONCLUSIONS 1. The proposed Site Plan, when viewed together with the adjacent site, appears to serve the public use and interest. 2. While the site is being developed as though it were one legal lot, and actually is being developed very much in conjunction with the easterly lot, the subject site is in fact 2 separate legal lots. The current commitment does not necessarily provide assurances for future modifications. The properties could be separated in future sales or leases. Therefore, parking and or lot lines should be modified to provide each building its requisite allotment of parking. 3. Along similar lines, which unfortunately have not been explored but should be a matter for future consideration, the compartmentalization of services or amenities, such as the 1 acre recreational complex proposed on the subject site, a cafeteria for the adjacent site, etc., does not address the potential severance of the linkage between sites in the future. These issues though would have to be explored, if such division occurred, and therefore, while the site plan is approved, it is approved based upon the current proposed linkage. 4. Modifications, generally as shown on Exhibit #2, to the parking stalls shall be required to assure access around the buildings and through the site for emergency vehicles. These modifications will also provide for safe access across the site by vehicles circulating through the parking lot and from this site across to the companion parcel east of this site. 5. While the applicant has' agreed to provide the traffic improvements required by the ERC, the site will still generate a substantial amount of cars. The additional parking, over standard requirements, will serve as an invitation for employees to utilize individual vehicles, rather than explore alternative transporation, including car pools and public mass transit. Even with the extensive improvments envisioned, amounting to expenditures of up to 20 to 40 Million Dollars ($20 - $40,000,000), the Level of Service is anticipated to be LOS E/F, that is, the roads will be very congested. Therefore, the applicant shall have to provide a tranporation coordinator who shall have to have the positive responsibility of working with Metro Transit and its Car Pool/Van Pool agency and the City of Renton to coordinate programs to minimize the number of separate automobile trips (known as single occupancy vehicles. SOV) generated by this and its associated adioin ng proposai. • Orillia Property Associate. SA-106-86 February 5, 1986 Page 5 6. Frankly, while this office has dabbled in requiring an applicant to provide van pool vehicles, the efforts were cumbersome and difficult to police. Therefore, without more this office will refrain from imposing such requirements:- This office will forward the response of Metro in this matter to the City Council and to the Mayor's Office for their considered review. 7. The actual building design, although details are limited, appears compatible with surrouding development in scale. While it might be reasonable to provide a focal point such as a plaza, fountain, or rotary as others have provided in recent plans proposed for properties in the vicinity, the 1 acre recreational area and the provision of a public access easement between 39th and the Springbrook Creek public right-of-way shall serve as a reasonable amenity. It might have been nice to orient Building 12 with a landscaped connection to the Creek amenity so near the site. 8. This Office cannot be expected to ignore the existing Boeing complex immediately north of the Central Business District and its general appearance. It is not an office park type of development like that envisioned by the Comprehensive Plan for the Green River Valley. This office will also not ignore such a complex's needs for security. As staff indicated, the Valley is supposed to be developed with an eye toward achieving aesthetic, appealing office park type development - campus-type development around a spacious plaza, with buildings relating to each other and taking advantage of natural site amenities. _ Lind Ave is one of the major north/south connectors and is the premier entry point to the Valley from the north. This site and its companion site lie just north of the Valley's major interchange with SR-167, and provide an entry point into Renton's proposed area for campus-type office park development. The site lies immediately adjacent to Springbrook Creek which can be developed into a serious, well designed public amenity. Therefore, to assure the development presents the office park appearance which the Comprehensive Plan requires, and which other development along Lind has been required to provide, if security fencing is installed, it shall be required to be adjacent to the perimeter parking and interior to the required landscaping. The landscaping shall be of such a nature as to hide and fully soften the appearance of any security fencing and shall be subject to the approval of the City's landscape architect. The landscaping shall.consist of a conbination of lawn, scrubs, and both flowering deciduous and conifer trees. This theme shall be consistent along the entire perimeter of the site, including along the Springbrook Creek frontage, and shall be carried through the adjoining site. Site Plan SA-100-85. 9. In the event fencing is not required, landscaping, subject to the approval of the City's Landscape,Architect shall consist of a combination of lawn, trees and shrubs. 10. To avoid any further delay in issuing this Decision, it will be issued prior to the Decision on the adjoining companion site, SA-100-85. The intent of this Decision is to show the linkage between the two sites and to provide in some manner that the development on the two sites is considered together. The sites share recreational amenities, eating facilities and access and parking systems. The two sites should have similar landscape treatments and the architectural details should be similar to further the image of a campus-type of development. DECISION The Site Plan is approved subject to the following conditions: 1. Parking and aisle width shall be modified as generally demonstrated on Exhibit #2, including the modification of turning radii, elimination of parking immediately north of Building 11, and the provision of a 'plaza' emergency drive across the rail line in the center of the site. 2. The provision of a pedestrian easement from the cul-de-sac to the Springbrook public right-of-way. 3. The provision of 1 acre of recreational facilities near the southwest corner of the site. 4. Landscaping shall be provided in accordance with the language of Conclusions 8 and 9 above. Orillia Property Associate:. SA-106-86 February 5, 1986 Page 6 5. The applicant, or the Boeing Company, shall appoint a tranporation coordinator who shall have to have the positive responsibility of working with Metro Transit, its Car Pool/Van Pool agency and the City of Renton to coordinate programs to minimize the number of separate automobile trips (known as single occupancy vehicles, SOV) generated by this and its associated adjoining proposal. ORDERED THIS 5th day of February, 1986. FRED J. KALWAN HEARING EXAMINER TRANSMITTED THIS 5th day of February, 1986 to the parties of record: Edward Heavey 201 Elliott Avenue West, Suite 400 Seattle, Washington, 98119 Bill Roach METRO 821 Second Avenue - Mail Stop 53 Seattle, Washington, 98104 TRANSMITTED THIS 5th day of February, 1986 to the following: Mayor Barbara Y. Shinpoch Councilman Richard M. Stredicke Richard Houghton, Public Works Director Larry M. Springer, Policy Development Director Members, Renton Planning Commission Ronald Nelson, Building & Zoning Director Glen Gordon, Fire Marshal Roger Blaylock, Zoning Administrator Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Renton Record-Chronicle Pursuant to Title IV, Section 3015 of the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before February 19, 1986. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for review by the Examiner within fourteen (14) days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific errors relied upon by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record, take further action as he deems proper. An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Section 3016, which requires that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk, accompanying a filing fee of $75.00 and meeting other specified requirements.. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection or purchase in the Finance Department, first floor of City Hall. The Appearance of Fairness Doctrine provides that no ex parte (private one-on-one) communications may occur concerning land use decisions. This means that parties to a land use decision may not communicate in private with any decision-maker concerning the proposal. Decision-makers in the land use process include both the Hearing Examiner and members of the City Council. All communications concerning the proposal must be made in public. This permits all interested parties to know the contents of the communication and would allow them to openly rebut the evidence. Any violation of this doctrine would result in the invalidation of the request by the Court. The Doctrine applies not only to the initial public hearing but to all Requests for Reconsideration as well as Appeals to the City Council. . 41 e \ . 9 / ILIA • Elf?' 1 L=1 , I UU C l�,+1 NO J_ I 11 J M—P ;C \\\ ,t NPI - 1� 'tt 1! , ,ii A .. a ) L ) ' i I I ---- . r- - . 1 . . .. - 'N L-1\ ---- I ' • :i.�, 1 � SYY sr 1 r 1 7 s 9O 1L I l S M !0M ' ..,sr SIII , i , 1 . 4 Li________I. ii' I I sr-. 2J ----; : L 9- 4. IT ----'-- 1 I , I111:s II , I , I -, � • q 1. , I 3T S. W. ' i Im—p) i;--7--r. ,- 7 y 9 i _ ___A. -. 1 --1.: 2 . i11 1r— 1 i b A :±=i � =I sin C. z , ' ��+.., . : / ti /- ______. i ____ ______ �t44 A1PI I ;I yr ,_ _. , L _ : , , J • / 1 5. W t'.,I 4/ST / STREET T _ p la S !7 • 7 6 4-.7VAILEY GENERAL HOSPITAL d .I I. M_P 8 5 ORILLIA IROPF.Rr!'Y ASSOCIATES • SA-106-85 APPLICANT ORTTT,IA PROPERTY ASSOCIATES TOTAL AREA ± 10.48 ACRES I I PRINCIPAL ACCESS S.W. 39TH STREET EXISTING ZONING ; M—P, MANUFACTURING PARK ' I EXIST I N G US EINDEVEIDPED PROPERTY PROPOSED USE TI16 BUILDINGS TOTALING 153,300 Sr?.FT. OF OFFICE SPACE COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN MANUFACTURING PARKA ULTIPLE OPTION COMMENTS i , • 1 .._ r ad 3 Z. tlf> , �. ...r,. • 8 +w..ew. .•_ -'' .n'tee~ _ • tr.-w.snry ,� I��: roi1.d YR�G—�41•3'1 G7s1C.1�14 r---) s.L•I'I'�'I', f I yl J . ` — __. C--'L .__ :; ��I `_. War i • _o� — 70 m g _y I'` T • rn _ i . , , _ 0 "..p: : . . • /7 • T7i ffi z ...c -. .1 ' —2 ___ . __._ • _: f _ f _ F� �' • 12- y{III�III- _ __ -1III1�'III x - . } i 1 .__ L...1 _ -— .Ll a le . [ '> 7 r____.4___I =____=7 '-- k (Th 1 • - t - - _ - Li 1H_1 I L=1 R (1•)NA�IVN 1 . . NO .►� Li I 1 11 I 1 s IM-P I 7 11 �. G-1 -__________-___-4 J _ \ __ ___ I1 L I I - - 1 , . IA ,I L-1 1 - le , 111 1 _— I I ' 1 • 7 6 7 2 11 iI O 1 —1 , , 1 , 1 1 1 rts s I I s 1I so - 1 , SO PST \ r 1•♦ . 1 1 1 - �. s . 3 s w_ J!M.L 3 1 I — — j l 1 1 qT • 1 j 1 ' N. I i I I i I S. W. 347H R -- 1 1 i — - —] :, J 1 1 It --i\ M-P —COIMPaM Iph,1 1, '>" 1 I • / t 7 ,._s 1. , Sr T 1 1 WAWA //:.....„. __Lli„,.,.iricy.= s - , i F. _. i ) _._ , / ...1 ,i ii _ 7 I I 1 5 + �I � /, s w Qi�r 5TAf T - I . P 1 • ��/ 7 6 4' 1 VALIEY 6E.E J ' ; II 1• HOSPITA L- — 11 p„ M-P 8 5 �I . , 1 _, i1, . II1 • ORILLIA PROPERTY ASSOCIATES, . LIMITED PARTNERSHIP SA-100-85. • APPLICANT ORILLIA PROPERTY ASSOCIATES TOTAL AREA - 11.74 ACRES PRINCIPAL ACCESS LIND AVENUE S.W. , EXISTING ZONING M-P, MANUFACTURING PARK EXI ST I�NG USE UNDEVELOPED PROPERTY PROPOSED USE CONSTRUCTION OF THREE, TRIO-STORY OFFICE BUILDINGS (120,000 SQ. FT. ) i COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN MANUFACITURING PARK/MULTIPLE OPTION I COMMENTS I. ' I . • • EVERGREEN i Taw STAKING DETAIL TREE STAKIFIG DETAIL GENERAL NOTES • 1 rs...........:f....7..-:•:..,_-•qr.--••;:..,e...7..7.....cr.,- . . , 2 ...Dr--r•-a•-'•-:.-::-..:.:-,._....'„,':.Z...•:!,:i•-., .i f fr.,, , sse t k) ,::•,,A '/, •r•.2.----v....,•....,..,. •....._,....,77.4,,_-•,,---1 • zy ---r......-.....,....-=...•..11,--q,,,••••,,..,...9.1.•a•-.•.-...nr „,y, 0,, g,.....,,..ze.-:-...,-........?.1f-rt..-..,....,,,,,,,,..„.-.., ...,..,...... V.. . J, ....1 . IA° • .... ..1! e....,,G.N., • A-,-....,AVV2e....-5-0,-.2,...••••,•..,.-........^..T.,........C. .2"...44.,..9.11,, 6",......-...2,^,-. ...,... I .....44"...r...-..........r....3..220.:•••A.A.,2,••••,-12.Nr.-..........A.V.L. ••••," C..,622--A2.2*A...-LA A.....A‘,...,..,_At..,..A. IS , '• . N ..., • I . lit . L.JA, -•••••••2.2210.0422 ..- I 2,....,,,,zu,.... -',-. ,,. ..1--.',.r--- ('. Is . .--...-•...,,,,..............,,7:...,.... ‘v....,,,,,..,.... o ,, C\,` .2.....•,•••••••!.........,,,.....---=3,0-9....-20, , - •,,,g2.7-7,,,,...p.....s.,• ta..A......s.1...2,--2.1,...,...2 6-I•A.....-..,,..__•••...,..,,e.• le, , / . g:4%4 a,OR,11\. /-.,I P,o a e..1.4, ........4,1v,r•.C-4.-.....-,, ibilt. )Am:....s,........-.......•••440.....7....-•,...c.e. • MO /- 0,,,,,,i,b,,1,..„ . . • • • I.'• .:,-;;;;;27.g•"' ) ,...,S.,,,...0.....,...v.,-.0.V'V , . i I •....I•,..,.. I /' _sracalretok,r_."• / 00,.../1•1,0,••••••••• .. ,\C , .... •2 / '111) . 21' I 14•,. -.1_,L ..... .... / .....44,./..- _ - gs4.2(403.447 • C.416-1.1f0,14,,A41, 11.1' a . . . ,ili.' • . - • •,:ie• ,, Ler„ .. . . • ..• .% .<. 44 • 9 N. . / • : 41-2 111.4.77.4,•13.1 Alca"WS.P..4.41VILY -,,0 ' ----------/./. ..r.A 45.111. cl / •ll.....•.•.,0 oti.I.E . .')1. • .. 1".1LY csAci. VA I 1 9 c) / ...on.,.11• MI . 0 ..... __ . • ..0.• ..-VIA,t.. .. .,,A.25 ......,....17.1•10,4,2,24. .....1.43Z.......ve',Me. Z.T'S‘a...0:0 fp A.&.Lel?,V S..454,. .g..,..g,,,,..r..,,-e.. _e.0 gill 144, . ,;;* ''' • A . . . .•'' -du& ,.,.. -..-,..............„-,.........-„,,,,,.,..„.„ . , • •••411t ei RI+, • ....0.4•13,....2C.VS-9. r.7.5...,Cole.,..r .4-.0"....../..g7 ;4 • Oir...4 - 6 ,......6,4•65,4V 5.7.,..t..., 1.., ..,;-e." ›- 0 ,,,,......,...Str2YI.00. ..,[1.1.,14,...e0i.. ...0• --- aill2'Islf) . ...'3,.? • % •S. . II Z 4;31 .1"...5 •25....s__55c.......-..ev•sw-tT,C1.4,,/-1.M.,,, C,,,,,... . IP' .1 110, . 1 .. - ISCE) ,...A.S.11,5..,.... G.1....,.:1...0 ff"...... ',Tr .7..a.z. vo-e-r....... , • i ls • _ :5 • . 1 ". co OM -,-,,,,,...-..1-,..e ..,•.,-...,.., -7 -...;-.- w••-,., 2 4 ..„ .... - -,,..was ..., •• .. ,./...„ )///c:......1 •'4, .2. ,-....2-2..Y.CM-2.,-.AA,...2,5.......-',Ad,- l'.S., lk,MN,. .4 .1. ‘. .... 4 0 ...- 4", 14-,..,V, ,.-..".44..t .;i3 Ai 12 * p.— ,\. " . ..10 C.) s. 03 1. ............W,W,....41,,.......=,S. W...,....n.., . . . CCID I•I .4.-C1-2-.. ......f.../ _ca. A- /7,.. ... v., ,!-: '-r""" ,. /i. / i. i ar • cn I ... ..... .___...„, .......‹,„,...„ —.,,,,.., . ,,y • • 410 . ,.—,......„ .,.."...4,0.,-,••••••••/.. I-A0-.--0.4/. OW .../ • 0 00. •••..., ,....,,-•,..igr .....vvr.r•.....1",..c/ r........ gp, •..• - // r- sk ,....5,....,...,...0,,.....•-•6••••.,....-,....,/,‘AA.,,,19 L.-SA-. CC .A.,.....0.••••,....Ao..2...0“2,1",•••10/....S.4.....,4,05,:.•ay..... C / ..". t 0 I.' 1-1 •-.•-••••••••-•?•-•••.".•••••••••,-...-/c.....,....a/yr•••',e.t.a 5,‘,..c.. eigr fr i.:: .\:' / (...) .;.,.: • (7.3-.'-`", , 5., ..i.• 'R ...zi"....,,,,,...•.•,••••••..2.414./...W.• .. ,.. 47-4P.G. 1•:••. . • / • •• W „••. • k, ..., .,......, 41,,,,,,, -1:3 c...1., .. .0.-4s( .• '•• /\-3 ® ILA • . -• 1 1 i 1 , ;; 1 ";:-:•-•:-; SHRUB PLANTING DETAIL Os' 0 ., .. ...-Nt • ........,......j.t..1 «. - a e• • 'Il . ../ 0' 3 .. .. . .2..) • 'I 1 ..... 0. , • • . CC .1.• . ..15 IS' / 'VIP. 'f14 .• • .4 : ....,.. CO , .•:: . ••I 11 • 1 tr/ :•P,'- ,,• S • .. / • • • .P,..." •r. ....•04;•••••.,,,,,....2, .01410111 „., . • . ITI • .i .....s., , .- r ....,. .... .. 40 Mr ..• . ' ;.{.,- 4 . • „„.....„,.... ,i3O . / G .4:/£‘41.t, ° II t <I' . ' . II .. frA •‘'''''.1 - '• • Of1' ..... - -/--- • • r (4 )1,.....”. . .„,<., ...\ • / ,','..:":.. .. _ ,„,....• .-yerrr_rcr'ffr [fr• /;• ,.,.'.../ .. (D_I. .._.L ILI 1 jos \\ AO/ • / I , „S ,,,.. •• 1=-..-',/". g 1,0 ris• 1. IV.° ,`\' •‘,.e0 . ,,,4's • :.`..•-• ; .1 41,III," . o. . .. • 19 .4.31 .,„ . ,\ \ \' , ,i(g•V• .W. 0.,..‘".....,' .. • . • .•. . a .. . V. •'• ,\\ \ I)i! . • \ / . . 111 A , el • . . iii .•,\.- ,.. . a'• • ../ ..... - _. :.t:_.:1 ±Ij • ''''' we, /.. • : i Al I. . i , • ...... ea. .. _. . . co .... g........., ...s•,' , .. _. lk ...• • ' c")4..1.14,,,, i . .Moo./2.• p•-\. . ...•/f-*....t, ' -_, II . • \.'•r • . . •. -,64:0•• 11 • • 1 i,...1.)-• - •• •- • • 1 1 I I 1 i 1 all Ili IP ..mok,... , . _ , ..n•••••,.•-• ,rja. CO SO /0-, 0 . 1 , I 8 • • ...am_ z.i. r •CmPt•I m, • - -7'7: . on...sr-• . . . • ,/...1' 1 , I " I i 1 •. • Pp1 SITE PLAN -L..- --I, • - 7,.tV.. 411,0r-e- 00 L - r ' • • • - .. .. . • ... • 6t...• .55,ansr.ffr • r . . . . . . , . tlo • f f • 1 I i 1 1 1 1 2 1 II I I I1 i i - 2 1 1 a H1— I A 1 i I C I once 1 • I . _ >_ z 11 Z I a 1 7 PA.2T..a._ ooz -_.•---....-1 _ V O I I , I , I I I • 1 I I I L I •L I_..i 1' I'• 11 I l.•_1 II _I- i ! • I 1 1 I ° I I . ` I 1 ; . 1 1 T. W __I_ -�,. !--I- I.. 1-i-,--I--1 - - I 1 W I I I I I L I i. i I _I I l • I I I I , : I I I 1 1 II I I� 1 ' 1 I I I 1 I I I I i I I � I I • I — ' w I '• 1_I r-_r — I I O . p �'f' LL M J'H 4�E� •O- -- nw..ra_ --__ — W U 1`► I I I _I _ _ I- I. ' I i i 1 I _ 1 —�— L_1 T 1— i I. I —I I i 1— n mill �JjI - - � _� �— _ 1 -Jr CL-tv_-r - 1 •I I .iI ± Jri ± iiI_ Li , I_ 1 _�- ; _ i 11 , Il. �ili, 1 - i. • I : � ' I. -— _ - r I I - • U LI L . yoch. t�.r✓ T,o-+ �" . l \-- I cc-'ss-- OF R4,4 �� , ��"� ° BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT - pia o RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR z0 �, ® `'' MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 • 235-2540 0,94'ED SEP�c�,0 BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR January 20, 1986 Edward Heavey O & W Properties, Inc. 201 Elliott Avenue West Seattle, Washington 98119 RE: ORILLIA PROPERTY ASSOCIATES, LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, FILE NUMBER SA-106-85 Dear Mr. Heavey: The City of Renton Building and Zoning Department formally accepted the above mentioned application on December 30, 1985. A public hearing before the City of Renton Land Use Hearing Examiner has been scheduled for January 28, 1986. The public hearing commences at 9:00 a.m. in the Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall. The applicant or representative(s) of the applicant is required to be present at the public hearing. A copy of the staff report will be mailed to you before the hearing. If you have any questions, please call the Building and Zoning Department at 235-2550. Sincerely, Roger J. Blaylock 131/4 Zoning Administrator RJB:JMM:ss 21B0Z.2 ,ii, //_v„_ • OF R. A �o ® ° BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT sal RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR 09 co� MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 • 235-2540 l ~ 0,9gr�0 SEP�Ets0- BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR MEMORANDUM r� �� jV �l JAN 14 1986 CITY,I�OFING RENT ON DATE: January 13, 1986 TO: Fred J. Kaufman, Hearing Examiner FROM: Environmental Review Committee SUBJECT: Orillia Property Associates, Limited Partnership FILE NUMBER: SA-106-85 ECF-124-85 LOCATED ON: the north side of S.W. 39th Street at the 800 block.. The Environmental Review Committee (ERC), under their substantive authority [Section 4-2822(D)] recommends to the decision maker, the Hearing Examiner, that the application for site plan approval to allow the construction of two buildings totaling 153,300 square feet of office space on 10.48 acres located on the north side of S.W. 39th Street at the 800 block is subject to the following conditions: 1. Installation of intersection improvements at Lind Ave. S.W. and S.W. 39th Street including a traffic signal and lane widening per Public Works Department approval. 2. In addition to the outside eating/recreational area provided, the developer shall provide on-site recreation to either include an exercise room, gym area, or similar function inside of one of the buildings or outside a tennis court, basketball, or sports court or similar area. 3. Installation of off-site recreational improvements along the east side of Springbrook Creek from S.W. 34th Street to S.W. 41st Street to include (1) 12-foot wide asphalt trail capable of supporting emergency vehicles built to both Park's and Public Works' Department standards, (2) two benches, and (3) twelve trees to be located by the Parks Department. Fred J. Kaufman, Hearing L.niner Re: Orillia Property Associates„ Limited Partnership File Number: SA-106-85/ECF-124-85 January 13, 1986 Page 2 • 4. The Public Works Department shall submit to the ERC by January 27, 1986, an area-wide traffic and circulation study bounded by South 180th on the south, SR-167 on the east, SR-181 on the west, and I-405 on the north, along with the extension of Oakesdale Avenue S.W. to SR-900. The study shall identify (1) a circulation system adequate to accommodate motor vehicle traffic locally generated in the study area at build-out office park intensity, (2) the total estimated cost of that system; (3) the total trip generation associated with said office park development, (4) an estimate of the per trip cost of constructing the system, (5) a list of those elements of the system which have already been constructed or committed to by pending developers and who receives credit (on a trip basis) for the cost of that construction; and (6) a prioritization of the construction projects needed in the immediate future to minimize the impact of developments currently being proposed in the study area. 5. Participation in area-wide traffic improvements identified by the above traffic study to the project's proportionate share based upon estimated daily traffic generation as calculated by standards established in the Institute of Traffic Engineers Trip Generation Manual. The ultimate costs per vehicle trip shall not exceed $175 per trip. (Estimated 1,840 vehicle trips). 6. Credit for adjacent signalization at S.W. 39th Street and Lind Avenue S.W. will be credited against the project's projected proportionate impact and for other scheduled area-wide improvements if the applicant proceeds to complete instead of the City constructing those improvements. The Environmental Review Committee finds that the following facts are true of the proposed project: 1. The addition of 1,840 vehicle trips to the anticipated 2,144 vehicle trips associated with Phase I construction and a 980-space parking lot that provides 70% of the parking for the adjacent 266,000 square feet of office to the south is significant and requires mitigation. The project represents approximately 30% of all anticipated traffic on S.W. 39th Street. 2. The addition of approximately 1,000 employees to the planned 2,500 employees in the adjacent 7 other office buildings creates a dramatic need for year-round on-site recreation. The outdoor eating area attempts to address some of the recreational needs of the on-site employees, but it focuses only on one aspect -- lunch. Other recreational activities must be introduced to serve the anticipated recreational needs of the employees. 3. The adjacent pedestrian corridor to the west along Springbrook Creek has been designated for public pedestrian use. Since it is an adjacent public right-of-way, it should be developed at the time of any development of any of the adjacent properties. Fred J. Kaufman, Hearing E,,, iner • •Re: Orillia Property Associates„ Limited Partnership File Number: SA-106-85/ECF-124-85 January 13, 1986 Page 3 4. The City of Renton must identify area-wide traffic circulation and improvement needs to provide continued public accessibility to individual privately owned properties. Without this formal identification by the City, the general level of service will continue to decline as a result of incremental adverse impacts resulting from private development. 5. The previous traffic evaluation conducted late in 1984 was based on a land use assumption of a much greater percentage of warehouse use and a lower intensity of office park uses. Actual and proposed development is office park in nature and this use generates significantly more traffic in addition to the general shift in type of vehicle trips. As a result a revised traffic study is necessary to reflect changing circumstances. 6. The total anticipated development by Boeing Electronics Company, Boeing Computer Services, and Boeing Commercial Airplane Company within the general traffic study area represents a known impact of 1.1 million square feet of office space and possibly 6,500 employees. This represents a doubling of 1984 employment in the study area. Therefore, the Boeing Corporation is a major contributor to present impacts and the ultimate impacts of full industrial development of the study area. The Boeing Corporation must therefore be a significant contributor to the solution. Therefore, the above conditions are necessary as a minimum for the preservation of the welfare and safety of the general public and a minimum to mitigate the adverse environmental impacts of the proposal. Under Section 4-2822(D), the decision maker must accept these conditions as binding upon his ultimate decision unless he identifies in writing a substantial error in fact or conclusion by the Environmental Review Committee. The decision maker then has the option of asking the ERC for reconsideration or revising the conditions. The applicant also has the ability to request reconsideration of these conditions from the ERC or appeal these conditions directly to the Hearing Examiner under authority granted in Section 4-2823(A)(1)(a) within 14 days of the date that the DNS is final. Therefore, the appeal date would be Monday, January 27, 1986, at 5 p.m. Appeals must be submitted in - the form prescribed by both the Environmental Ordinance of the City of Renton and the Hearing Examiner Ordinance, Section 4-3011(B). RJB:wr:ss 1009N cc: (1) Edward Heavey (2) Robert Morgan, Corporate Manager Orillia Property Associates, L.P. Real Property Division • c/o O&W Properties, Inc. Boeing Company 201 Elliott Avenue West P. O. Box 3707 Seattle, Washington 98119 Mail Stop 13-03 Seattle, Washington 98124 2162Z CITY OF RENTON HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING JANUARY 28, 1986 AGENDA COMMENCING AT 9:00 A.M.: COUNCIL CHAMBERS, SECOND FLOOR, RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING The applications listed are in order of application number only and not necessarily the order in which they will be heard. Items will be called for hearing at the discretion of the Hearing Examiner. ORILLIA PROPERTY ASSOCIATES, LIMITED PARTNERSHIP Application for site plan approval to allow the construction of three, two-story office buildings totaling 178,605 square feet on an 11.74 acre site, file number SA-100-85: located at the northwest corner of Lind Avenue S.W. and S.W. 39th Street. ORILLIA PROPERTY ASSOCIATES, LIMITED PARTNERSHIP Application for site plan approval to allow the construction of two buildings totaling 153,300 square feet of office space on 10.48 acres of property, file SA-106-85: property located on the north side of S.W. 39th Street at the 800 block. 'OF R4, �• © 0 BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT . z z. r.11 o RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR 09 co� MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 • 235-2540 0,9g16o SEPIT-• BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR MEMORANDUM • DATE: January 13, 1986 TO: Fred J. Kaufman, Hearing Examiner FROM: Environmental Review Committee SUBJECT: Orillia Property Associates, Limited Partnership FILE NUMBER: SA-106-85 ECF-124-85 LOCATED ON: the north side of S.W. 39th Street at the 800 block. The Environmental Review Committee (ERC), under their substantive authority [Section 4-2822(D)] recommends to the decision maker, the Hearing Examiner, that the application for site plan approval to allow the construction of two buildings totaling 153,300 square feet of office space on 10.48 acres located on the north side of S.W. 39th Street at the 800 block is subject to the following conditions: 1. Installation of intersection improvements at Lind Ave. S.W. and S.W. 39th4 IS Street including a traffic signal and lane widening per Public Works Department approval. 2. In addition to the outside eating/recreational area provided, the developer shall provide on-site recreation to either include an exercise room, gym area, or similar function inside of one of the buildings or outside a tennis court, basketball, or sports court or similar area. 3. Installation of off-site recreational improvements along the east side of Springbrook Creek from S.W. 34th Street to S.W. 41st Street to include (1) 12-foot wide asphalt trail capable of supporting emergency vehicles built to both Park's and Public Works' Department standards, (2) two benches, and (3) twelve trees to be located by the Parks Department. • F rod J. Kaufman. Hearing E,. .;finer , Re: Orillia Property Associates., Limited Partnership F ile Number: SA-106-85/ECF-124-85 January 13, 1986 Page 2 4. The Public Works Department shall submit to the Januaryanth 180 7. 1986. an area-wide traffic and circulation study bounded by Sh on the south. SR-167 on the east. SR-181 on the west, and I-405 on the north, along with the extension of Oakesdale Avenue S.W. to SR-900. The study shall identify (1) a circulation system adequate, to accommodate motor vehicle traffic locally generated in the study area at build-out office park intensity, (2) the total estimated cost of that system; (3) the total trip generation associated with said office park development. (4) an estimate of the per trip cost of constructing the system. (5) a list of those elements of the system which have already been constructed or committed to by pending developers and who receives credit (on a trip basis) for the cost of that construction; and (6) a prioritization of. the construction projects needed in the immediate future to minimize the impact of developments currently being proposed in the study area. 5. Participation in area-wide traffic improvements identified dpbyn the i above traffic study to the project's proportionate share daily traffic generation as calculated by standards established in the Institute of Traffic Engineers Trip Generation Manual. The ultimate costs per vehicle trip shall not exceed $175 per trip. (Estimated 1,840 vehicle trips). 6. Credit for adjacent signalization at S.W. 39th Street and Lind Avenue S.W. will be credited against the project's projected proportionate pr impact pact and for other scheduled area-wide improvements if the applicant to complete instead of the City constructing those improvements. Th e Environmental Review Committee finds that the following facts are true of the proposed project: 1. The addition of 1,840 vehicle trips to the anticipated ,144 parkingtcle lot that trips associated with Phase I construction and a 980-space provides 70% of the parking for the adjacent 266,000 square feet of office to the south is significant and requires c on mitigation. S.W.The project 39th Street.represents approximately 30% of all anticipated traffic 2. The addition of approximately 1,000 employees to the planned 2,500 employees the 7 other office creates need for year-round on-sitaecreation. The outdoor eating area attempts yees, to address some of the recreational lunchneeds Other the recQeational act�vitiesbmust ut it focuses only on one aspect be Introduced to serve the anticipated recreational needs of the f employees. 3. The adjacent pedestrian corridor to the west along Springbrook Creek has been designated for public pedestrian use. Since the time tt offs an adjacent any developmenblof ic right-of-way. it should be developed at any of the adjacent properties. f.red J..Kaufman, Hearing Examiner f, e: Orillia Property Assoc,{ Th s„ Limited Partnership F>r File Number: SA-106', }ECF-124-85 January 13, 1986 Page 3 • 4. The City of Renton must identify area-wide traffic circulation and. improvement needs to provide continued public accessibility to individual privately owned properties. Without this formal identification by the City. the general level of service will continue to decline as a result of incremental adverse impacts resulting from private development. 5. The previous traffic evaluation conducted late in 1984 was based on a land use assumption of a much greater percentage of warehouse use and a lower intensity of office park uses. Actual and proposed development is office park in nature and this use generates significantly more traffic in addition to the general shift in type of vehicle trips. As a result a.revised traffic study is necessary to reflect changing circumstances. 6. The total anticipated development by Boeing Electronics Company, Boeing Computer Services, and Boeing Commercial Airplane Company within the general traffic study area represents a known impact of 1.1 million square feet of office space and possibly 6,500 employees. This represents a doubling of 1984 employment in the study area. Therefore, the Boeing Corporation is a major contributor to present impacts and the ultimate impacts of full industrial development of the study area. The Boeing Corporation must therefore be a significant contributor to the solution. Therefore, the above conditions are necessary as a minimum for the preservation of the wolfare and safety of the general public and a minimum to mitigate the adverse environmental impacts of the proposal. Under Section 4-2822(D). the decision maker must accept these conditions as binding upon his ultimate decision unless he identifies in writing a substantial error in fact or conclusion by the Environmental Review Committee. The decision maker then"has the option of asking the ERC for reconsideration or revising the conditions. The applicant also has the ability to request reconsideration of these conditions from the ERC or appeal these conditions directly to the Hearing Examiner under authority granted in Section 4-2823(A)(1)(a) within 14 days of the date, that the DNS is final. Therefore, the appeal date would be Monday, January 27, 1986, at 5 p.m. Appeals must be submitted in the form prescribed by both the Environmental Ordinance of the City of Renton and the Hearing Examiner Ordinance, Section 4-3011(B). RJB:wr:ss • 1009N cc: (1) Edward Heavey (2) Robert Morgan, Corporate Manager Orillia Property Associates, L.P. Real Property Division c/o O&W Properties, Inc. Boeing Company 201 Elliott Avenue West P. O. Box 3707 Seattle, Washington 98119 Mail Stop 13-03 Seattle, Washington 98124 c% 2175Z • BUILDING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING JANUARY 28, 1986 APPLICANT: ORILLIA PROPERTY ASSOCIATES, LIMITED PARTNERSHIP FILE NUMBER: SA-106-86 A. SUMMARY & PURPOSE OF REQUEST: The applicant seeks site plan approval to allow the construction of two buildings totaling 153,300 square feet of office space on 10.48 acres of property. B. GENERAL INFORMATION: 1. Owner of Record: Orillia Property Associates, Limited Partnership 2. Applicant: Orillia Property Associates, Limited Partnership 3. Location: (Vicinity Map Attached) Located on the north side of S.W. 39th Street at the 800 block. 4. Existing Zoning: M-P, Manufacturing Park 5. Existing Zoning in the Area: M-P, Manufacturing Park: H-1, Heavy Industrial 6. Comprehensive Land Use Plan: Manufacturing Park/Multiple Option 7. Size of Property: t 10.48 acres 8. Access: S.W. 39th Street 9. Land Use: Undeveloped property 10. Neighborhood Characteristics: North: Undeveloped Property East: Undeveloped Property South: Manufacturing/Office Uses West: Undeveloped Property C. HISTORY/BACKGROUND: Action File Ordinance Date Annexation --- 1745 Apr. 4, 1959 • Corrected --- 1764 May 19, 1959 • Corrected --- 1928 Dec. 12, 1961 Rezone (G to M-P) R-560-69 2533 Dec. 22, 1969 Special Permit SP-812-75 --- Nov. 26, 1975 D. PUBLIC SERVICES: 1. Utilities: a. Water: A 16-inch water line is located along Lind Avenue S.W. and a 12-inch water line is located along S.W. 39th Street. b. Sewer: An 8-inch sanitary sewer line ends in the cul-de-sac at the end of S.W. 39th Street. c. Storm Water Drainage: Storm water drains into constructed storm drains which then drain into Springbrook Creek and the P-1 Channel. PRELIMINARY REPORT THE HEARING EXAMINER to ORILLIA PROPERTY ASSL,C.;IATES, FILE NO. SA-106-86 JANUARY 28, 1986 PAGE 2 2. Fire Protection: Provided by the City of Renton as per ordinance requirements. 3. Transit: Metro Transit Route No. 199 operates along Lind Avenue S.W. adjacent to the subject property. 4. Schools: a. Elementary Schools: N/A b. Middle Schools: N/A c. High Schools: N/A 5. Recreation: Passive recreation areas will be provided on-site. Active recreation areas are located within a three mile radius of the subject site. ' E. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE ZONING CODE: 1. Section 4-730, Manufacturing Park (M-P). 2. Section 4-744(F)(2), Green River Valley Landscaping Requirements. F. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR OTHER OFFICIAL CITY DOCUMENT: 1. Industrial Goal and Objectives, Policies Element, City of Renton Comprehensive Plan Compendium, January 1985, p. 18-19. 2. Valley Comprehensive Plan, City of Renton Comprehensive Plan Compendium, January 1985, p. 31-50. G. DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS: 1. The applicant, Orillia Property Associates. Limited Partnership, is requesting site plan approval to allow construction of two 2-story buildings totaling 153,300 square feet of office space on a 10.48 acre site. The property is located on the north side of S.W. 29th Street at approximately the 800 block. The facility will be constructed for Boeing Electronics Company, (BECO) a new division of the Boeing Corporation. This expansion of 153,000 square feet is the second phase of development of the BECO relocation into the City of Renton. The initial phase was the remodeling of approximately 266,000 square feet of the Benaroya Business Park located to the south along with the construction of a 1,000 stall parking lot to service the new complex. 2. The development will introduce between 1,100 and 1,300 employees into the area and represent approximately 30 percent of the anticipated traffic! generated on S.W. 39th Street. 3. The Environmental Review Committee has issued a declaration of non-significance. The appeal period for their declaration will expire on I Monday. January 27, 1986, at 5 p.m. In addition, the Environmental Review l Committee imposed the following conditions under the substitive authority [Section 4-2822(D)]: 1. The installation of intersection improvements at Lind Avenue S.W. and S.W. 39th Street including a traffic signal and lane widening per Public Works Department approval. 2. In . addition to the outside eating/recreation area provided, the developer shall provide on-site recreation to either include an exercise room, gym area or similar function inside one of the buildings or outside a tennis court, basketball, or sports court for similar area. 3. Installation of off-site recreational improvements along the east side of Springbrook Creek from S.W 34th Street to S.W. 41st Street, to include: a. 12-foot wide asphalt trail capable of supporting emergency vehicles built to both Parks and Public Works Department standards; PRELIMINARY REPORT THE HEARING EXAMINER c,‘ORILLIA PROPERTY ASS' . FATES, FILE NO. SA-106-86 JANUARY 28, 1986 PAGE 3 b. two benches; and c. twelve trees to be located by the Parks Department. 4. The Public Works Department shall submit to the ERC by January 27, 1986, an area-wide traffic and circulation study bounded by South 180th on the south, SR-167 on the east. SR-181 on the west, and I-405 on the north, along with the extension of Oakesdale Avenue S.W. to SR-900. The study shall identify: a. a circulation system adequate to accommodate motor vehicle traffic locally generated in the study area at build-out office park intensity; b. the total estimated cost of that system; c. the total trip generation associated with said office park development; d. an estimate of the per trip cost of constructing the system; e. the list of those elements of the system which have already been constructed or committed to be pending developers and who receive credit (on a trip basis) for the cost of the construction; and f. the prioritization of the construction projects needed in the immediate future to minimize the impact of development currently being proposed in the study area. 5. Participation in the area-wide traffic improvements is identified by the z above traffic study to the projects proportionate share based upon estimated daily traffic generation as calculated by standards established in the institute of traffic engineers trip generation manual. The ultimate cost per vehicle trip shall not exceed $170 per tri•4 (estimated 1,840 vehicle trips). 6. Credit for adjacent signalization at S.W. 39th Street and Lind Avenue S.W. will be credited against the project's projected proportionate impact and for other scheduled area-wide improvements if the applicant proceeds to complete instead of the City constructing those improvements. 4. In the review of a site plan, the staff and the Hearing Examiner should normally consider the following criteria: • Compatibility of Adjacent Structures • Compliance with the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code • Access • Functionality of Parking Lot • Traffic Circulation • Usable Public Open Space • On-site Recreation Compatibility of Adjacent Structures The area between S.W. 43rd Street and S.W. 34th Street lying between Oakesdale Avenue S.W. and Lind Avenue S.W. has basically been acquired by BECO through Orillia .Property Associates to create one large industrial/office facility. The only intrusion into that area is Reliable Distributors located on the southwest corner of Lind Avenue S.W. and S.W. 34th Street. The intent is to create an industrial park for one corporate entity. Presently, BECO has remodeled the four buildings to the south of the site into office structures and constructed a major parking lot. The approximately 11.7 acres to the east of the subject site will be developed into another three office buildings (SA-100-85). The proposed structures will, therefore, blend with most of the adjacent office type structures presently proposed for the east and possibly in the future proposed for the north. PRELIMINARY REPORT ." THE HEARING EXAMINER • ORILLIA PROPERTY ASSOCIATES, FILE NO. SA-106-86 JANUARY 28, 1986 PAGE 4 Compliance with the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code: The proposed office/industrial development follows the basic intent of the Comprehensive Plan and its land use designation of Manufacturing/Multiple Option. This is not,in the area envisioned for heavy office concentration, btit the general development of Boeing is introducing some new higher intensity uses into the region than anticipated. The proposed site design as projected complies with the specifics 'of the Comprehensive Plan and the Manufacturing Park zone classification. Access Access is provided for the general public from two directions. The first is from the south from S.W. 39th Street and the other is from the adjacent lot to the east. Since the entire project will function under one corporate operation, the access interties appear appropriate. Emergency access will also be provided from the east and south. Functionality of the Parking Lot The parking lot has severe design problems as a result of the lot configuration, of the original plat. The original plat suggested individual development, but now combining the lots together the shapes create major design complications. The major problem is the triangular shape of building lot #11. The turning radii inside the lot do not comply with the Fire Department standards and create the public safety problem. Probably the best way to improve the access situation is to create a plaza that can be utilized for emergency vehicles between proposed buildings #11 and #12. This would not only provide emergency access but eliminate some of the more severe turning radii problems on the site. In total, it is estimated that the site plan revision would eliminate ten (10) parking spaces to allow proper turning radii. One additional design problem can be seen in that the major east-west access proposed on the north side of building #11. Motor vehicles will be backing out directly onto the aisleway along the south side. It would be more appropriate to eliminate all parking along the north side (south side.of the, access aisle) of the building and create a separated internal traffic corridor, that links through the adjacent side,on the east to Lind Avenue S.W. The applicant has provided more than the required parking for the anticipated building space. This appears to be a requirement of the Boeing Corporation to overpark their site as a result of general corporate policy. Traffic Circulation On-site traffic circulation with' some modifications will allow access to adjacent public streets. Off-site traffic circulation is becoming critical and thus the Environmental Review Committee has required participation in the general traffic circulation and transportation upgrading necessary for the{ valley subregion. BECO will be introducing in less than one year almost twice the number of workers presently employed'in 'the Valley. Pedestrian Circulation The site does not generally provide adequate pedestrian circulation. It is noted that the site plan does not locate sidewalks in the most convenient locations for access. It does not address either the necessary pedestrian interconnection with the office buildings to the east or the required pedestrian link to the Springbrook Pedestrian Corridor in the southwest corner of the subject site from S.W. 39th Street. This is a public easement that must be built to City standards and allow public access. { PRELIMINARY REPORT 1 u 1HE HEARING EXAMINER ORILLIA PROPERTY ASSOCIATES, FILE NO. SA-106-86 JANUARY 28, 1986 PAGE 5 Usable Public Open Space: The site plan provides a very small amount of outdoor open space. It appears that the applicant considers the outdoor eating/sitting area on the parcel adjacent to the east as servicing both complexes. On-Site Recreation: In the review of site plans in the Valley, the staff in the past has not focused on the intent of the Recreational Element of the Valley Comprehensive Plan. This is the first instance where the Parks and Recreation Department has projected a formal position of private enterprise providing on-site recreation. The Valley Plan includes the following policies that are applicable to private developments: 1. Provision of recreational opportunities should be an integral part of the development of the Valley. 2. Recreational opportunities in the Valley that serve both the employees and the community should be encouraged. 3. Firms with large numbers of employees should develop outdoor recreation facilities. 4. Whenever feasible, greenbelt/openspace and wildlife habitats should be managed to include recreational opportunities as a secondary objective. The ERC has required that the developer do substantial improvements along the Springbrook Pedestrian Walkway along with some form of on-site recreation. The Walkway is a "public" pedestrian access and could probably never be closed; therefore, it seems reasonable to locate most outdoor recreation adjacent to the walkway to meet the intent of the first recreational policy. It would also seem reasonable since the walkway will eventually be in the center of the BECO industrial plant an adjoining recreational area could serve both the employees and the general public. 5. In conclusion, the proposal appears to met the public interest by implementing the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code. Both major and minor revisions are warranted to improve both pedestrian and traffic circulation; manuevering in the parking lot; and on-site open space and recreational areas. H. DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATION: Based upon the above analysis, it is recommended that the Hearing Examiner approve the site plan request, File Number SA-106-85, by Orillia Property Associates, Limited Partnership subject to the following conditions: 1. Creation of a plaza inbetween the buildings straddling the railroad tracks to provide an emergency access turn-around and a pedestrian link between the two proposed buildings. 2. Remove and relocate the parking on the south side of the primary east-west access aisle so there are no parking spaces backing onto this access corridor. • 3. Introduction of a one (1) acre recreational area adjacent to the pedestrian walkway. This will provide recreational opportunities for the office workers on the south side of Springbrook Creek. The area shall include both passive and active recreational areas in the plan. The design shall be approved by the Parks and Recreation Department and it must be open to the public. 4. Redesign the site plan to include a separate pedestrian circulation system that links the site with the sidewalk along S.W. 39th-Street, the office complexes to the east, and the public pedestrian walkway along Springbrook Creek. I • .I \\\ �I 1 : ' IEIE�'uL� • f ;LN( I WI II L.*1 9 II bb jM..PI ,t IT 1111— — ! \ �_ ICI. q I ,x II L-1 Tl 1 1 , .-- - �. I s w 24[r if '�. i ,....7411. : . trl ' ri 11 f 11 ; 1 7 •e 9 2 • 2 I I 1 1 1Q - I 1 1V I , 5 W JOIN , 1:!li }�� , ; 1 I r llsT sr L I ' 1 1� I ' 1 I j l i 1 • L S 4 S , I i • I ; I A i I I 1 I ' S. W. 34TH �_ _ _ Q.—_. I_� i I 1 ylY 1 ' I , -..1 1 MaMP) L Q I 8 9 I ii- T1': -, : I: /A8 / '.. -- . ' I z... s �s tr` IY- Pa i �sr ) �jVi 2I 51� 1 r.„ Ak A11. .. • "s1—--—___/ . .? l., 3 . i f - ______.) 0 •-•'''....." g L , • jS. W. 4rsr. SIRE r �_ P-1 / 4 VALLEY GENE AL // 6 ) \ HOSPITAL -a! : 1 . - M-P 8 5 I ; l • . ORILLIA PROPERTY ASSOCIATES I SA-106-85 ' V I APPLICANT ORTTT,IA PROPERTY ASSOCIATES TOTAL AREA ± 10.48 ACRES' . PRINCIPAL ACCESS S.W. 39TH STREET 1 ' ! EXISTING ZONING M-P, MANUFACTURING PARK E X I S T I NG U S FIJNDEVELOPED PROPERTY PROPOSED USE TV70 BUILDINGS TOTALING 153,300 sq.FT. OF OFFICE SPACE COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN MANUFACTURING PARK/MULTIPLE OPTION COMMENTS • 1 + 7 ,, gp ,=.:o,�1\t.%., . � LAND U. ELEMENT Qjr! .,, • Single Family Commercial . 1 $T 0°0°O° o°o°o°o o 0 0 0 0 Low Density lols, y \\ `pe0'`••+ `'�, Multi-Family Office / Office Parl ', Medium Density 0000°°° �• <',t "'`'°iT;'7,,, •0000000 e�.•.• ;., •:•:•:•:•.•-•:•:•:•:•:. Multi-Family o°°°O°°• ublic/Quasi-Public \ 71 •,•. ____ _ _ • ::;:;: ; :EN r High Density • - - ----- � Li 9 ht Industrial\ Multi-Famil y \\�;,• ��. 'T^ • • ' _ ' - ' .q`,yt ' Recreation •••••. Heavy Industrial _ _ •. __�Qf�t�� • • • • =Mp!M} 0000. _ -_____ 00000. I d` , .� `. � —____ °°°°°°° � - Greenbelt =____ �� • --- 0000°°° Manufacturing Parl ___ °°°°°°°°°°••�:•: ____ / Multiple Option •0000°°°°°°°°.• r�' �* •c: o0000000000000• • ____ •es 4000000000000000 - •__- �F� 1llT= �..-.- �c' •o0000000000000�.: � 1� - n:'� - -� f✓ •-•.-••� :-- �• I ^ • •0000000000000 = „lie': iyy�� it •0000000• ' •• 00000� •��--- r • 000.'. ........ .: - *. i •, .:;':, - INIA ill f .....c .l�,• 11 \ ��.71LIr \ lif t........,_ .. i_ ,..,...., .-_--_-____-___-_-::_t_-_--__-_-_--__- :::: :.4.7.1-.7-1-.77 ..1.:5' • (I 1 • i.r�=� �e III■ ! 1 t" = i .000 =-_ - •oo •`::,::.:.:' -- • MO ! 1•. - 000•---- 000• �.�,:::•:: :..••" -< •••1 •ti O Ili■ ,f =_ _ _•000 :y'.;. •'•• •000: .... iih . ` / 1 • • • iii• •000 ::;'i: :•,. �, i .-•ram 111■ �000• • � All 1 ••..•T �: III•. •` __ __ - _ `I n! :-. �,L, • 1 .ii•i III..\! 1' 1 i ---- � ' ;i`` • _.. ....• I i Cam' .m 1 1 t" r i.—: iSiZ:7; t o 00o i •, \11. coo�-!■ I I UI ..i•I .?" _ -- •' �. 0000• _J007JI .•.•■ , III - - C.• 00000 •. Y%1C> _111 _ ___ + ' r0000• .�` �_ - -- _ _ •. ;!• •0000000c�'^ • •..0 1.1' '.1.LS�S_--i�__..■' _ y .c: 000• c, 0 ?� _ iL ;OOJ JC: /1tt}}}}} '11111111111111'20.'r��3:''`'�� _ _ -__ '�' I i i F•'`f * i-j-J%‘I,ti"1 I , `• .l C`M...1 1' • r�, r _----_-_- - _-- r • 1 1 .0 C L. •• • '" __ ==1- a 1_- .<;re. I :.;!-•;"ti,. ;:-41Editglrj1P/Iii°__ir::::::::::::Tib 7-7;7-7, ill--_---_-_-_ ----_=-:: Aj?!: mil ii IN , I 2 .::.::::,.•::::::::;:;::::: .........Sk 1 .. . ___ !/ O.1- ____ _ - .II•.• V•00 is :::. •.per+ _ 0000• 7�,� .n•.1I.w! r__._._ -- -- �� .a"-___ __ .. I�::11.1" 0000000 • 4•y ,000000000, ':!. ... pp.....--I y~y�l� __ -- r 1.. COOCOO CO• Y= -; � - I 1 00000000o o o° T o0000000•• I+ 1 _ � '—__ !•I, 0000000..•�,� :' ?r C ,-••I',Optor..:0e..,.1' � _ r.oi 0000000 C, . __ -00000• `✓ 'v/ 1 " •.`t � - - -- •. .:• � 0000•, ill, O000••00 O o 00 N; 0000•00000• - - • 0000•000000 " '•� ,I — '-- _ 0000 Oo0o0 • 1I0°0°0°0°.°0°0°• .i • W : 1 1I .Y7 . . 1 • JUT ii • , . ., N. 0ooco — • • p 000o0oo› _ — — j• io0o°o°o0o°o �o ' 00 0°00 00 O0 00 0 • + z• I •�°o00000 C. , 0 ° ° ° 00 taiT2• • Z 0, !q 0 • €21 = o • oo , , I \.... 1 r. .•,:.. ---1 1-------i ( ;) f . . .. . .i..........s -....,..s •*,•<- ... . . • ..„.., t,...v............-,. *X-.-'"::6V:i. •' • ' ! I , 4 , i , : ,• • • ! ' IL Li , .,-..- ------ -- — -- —• .„,_,.. ,1 U L _ __,., _ . I i•-•••,..1 *L"r4:" < . f _.,.-1 ,_..,..:-..,•,.., ...4• ,..---i-r.... 1 •.1- ..... ,77,-- _7.1_7. .---:,r? 'f.r____,i ' , ,i zi---./-r . _._._. 1: ---J-- _—_i .,,,,,,..,n. __ -• -,- ,. --I • i r—j\\'''7'*..'. I/ 1.,.. ''::..'• : ;---.. ". . ,.\ • ..4 N) .. , \\ P 4 FilL -I I .... • • ' • . ——11 ....., \'\ .,.,\ \ —— N. , \ ./ /.'• /, ,/ .'4,,,, \ \ '/• oP / .,./ ./ •))1/ 4 • * • -zpr ‘ \\ - , •,/,. .. -z, • ii- 'I , '' • 1 IA ri 0 . • ' • . . , . 0 . —I be-0-a-,...cP J.999449 orgy \ • Ir S' '\s // • ' , ,} • • / . • . Ir .......•3........na,M.,.,I., Cent.11.1 .',:Ur•L'Ir.7.1•r 71".:OA=..;:••;., --- -,-----....,...?.....,,,, ..., i .- . 9-49,U...i tat•249c, iN.Pa-. /. '.% 4•. /. l'e . . , I'. ."' '.4 /,• _.• . i 1 ! ° . \ r I [ \ • • 1 / e<• . % .,,,,z . ., 7.: _•• % -- ./.. !" • , 0 (°---.:V..-ZTZ.-”.42.r."'"''...."' 7:-- // .. \ jSK\ •• • . —- r '-"-- r •„. .. __ _ . , /7. .,.. •,,,, • . 0 a :-.---_-rz:.::::T= _ - - •'',. / 1 " . S•7,-L- 1_1_1Y_Lq. 7 —Li __ /./' . ''...... .'. " ' \r, ." r,. • 4,,././(:,,,'',, t• , z \. .. . 7 .:/../. 0 _ .V.N\ . '''.! .. " / M ( 1+1+11;111+1.1•1•1'!,[1/ /2 ,. \ r- C fr ! • ,<, 0 , . . ,.•: ',.' -I • ':I.1- , - , . ..i.. :., . j • . 0 • --- - _ _. .:.,-- / . z _ _ . . ..,.„.1/,...•0.M.5..4,h.,. '..,,, .t ' )\%. . •f'9,, ---- ---- 2 -c. __ —.._.,....„ 1 1 • '/ '''/\\ ./' . , /(,. . .'' "/ ' • .. / ' ;-.: ,. ,c,.....> '/ 1 . . ; ".• . k -..,.\',*., / ' . • \ /// • ,... /., .-- , • / . / \.,. .. / '.. ' 7 i _ .________ .. ./,,,• • I - -- -- \\- , • _ - _ ... !I . • EVERGREEN TREE STAKING DETAIL TREE STAKING DETAIL GENERAL NOTES _ _ 1 . •....,,,...f.e .-,-.•--,,... -,-----,...,....,,,,..,,,,,,,,,p,.., ........,.a,-•••,...„:^,....,,...c .......-,.,..,..1."•,,,,,,,.....,.._-",.7......-,,,,,-2•....7., . . .44,.1-.4., V....•.}.....,5.........,.. ',...--.....N.../5/.0---.E.:75 0. eye,fi •...............--.2..-5.‘,.....5-N.J...2.5....-5-2.-.L.55 V . '.... ............ ./.5.......5.5-5_ .„..„..z.z.sz.,..,......sca 6 A-.-2,..aa.--....--,,,,Fna.4,..-4.•-,....1"1"..e.A..-n,,,,,- .•. •,...........-.....,..c..eva....5-....-ca.a.a..4.v........-..te,...c....cv "•\ ii; AVA,A i .frolAtto ____64,Lo,„.....,, ...., _ . .1.0,-,-0..,.....,,2.,"-.-4.4.•-. ...V.1.00.... ......,...- .....A.A.-4.,,0-..,.1-,/ ei "‘ // . ....-£...nt ....r-,- . • \ .2-517•771iZier./.6.-..........z.,.....•.',.^.- -.A%e,A...:,c....... / 6 . ..d.,..\.„ • -'- .---- o....e...,-ta..... .,.....re........,...........--31,...es-,,,•,....-..., I frliftf° i 4 ,,v,re.' 4,SOAD /P-it5: ,1" 6•40,,,,. -.-,Z-•:V....au, n ...,-..-a-..-.a.c...vev.a ...c.....c••••••01,0•0 0.-AZ.....0., -..,I PIA,.•AV.,,..07.2..t.//KZ>..401:0,7,....0CA / 'II W II : 1411‘11' ,52.q.2"375° 00 . . . • /-/-71,A. oWer ciceeer*eel • ,..., I ( / •.V.0 0,4,111 /\NS.%) • IU 1 A -t.. ...k., ni • ''''',;•E-"".••." ,,,,V.-0 0 0 0,1...440,49 re*. . .,.. - :: -,. •.$7; 4.-e., , 17-YIP ' .... . '• •••'''`v. .,•„. , -¢,-,7•00-00,...,h1.• : ..0...•7•010.0 t or......12.4"......., men......•',w.f....me ,f4) , .,........,4,..,,,, - ..- -' ' ---------'17'^''''t2A7cf• '100 ,AK,K0 elle 0, ' /4 -.........,-.. . 042.1,9,0 - /0 %/ rrn •\ CO • 41111 .•A' ." j4. .' -.A.,....4,6...Q......A. _a..a.., .......e raze t v.=,.......5'0 0 . . .9 ......,,A43,0A>11.:25....•......W lej/1.4,..e.-2..."4.4.pro . .P ',.,„ .., .....,....,C-A,0.N.A/..0.......N•...--1 .0 Cw- 0A ...- • . ,,e , ..r.-,'. 0 ,.......,6 nreve..3,5' rt-5......,eLvevear .4.'1",.., ...A., 4„ „/-....4% • 0A •-1.-4,0`5-1-.9 ..-e, ..1..1 • v / >. 6 ..,.. ti _I, _ i 1. z 6_ __ e -:-..Y.y.-•Cr7T,,,S S4/ ,,S5 -.....,1:7‘.•.•/,M..!.....^A , .0.ANIYAV e'10‘ .0 -1,-,0,6 .... e/ , 4 •It Z SISS "`Lieug-...--1...,-ar...,,,,,' 5,-...A. • 7,00 -7....z. %."/..s.A., ., 0. 3 ( ,2-1, ) 2 < COD -4--,,.....",444...a.,,'.,-,477,.4.4 ...se- tc-evo, ,A4 Cccop0•.2• . ,0 v.......µ. Po e.. fru. . .. " 4 / , ‘s/ i,eJi•mg/ # - . . ( (..) 0z- .- .,...,..,...., Iii 9.1.5 / • j , Cl) ,313 ,,v .,,... -,...,/On,......,,,,,-...6uSlirc:00-0.4,0 V-0-...,0. dr 4.2, '', .,.. 04 - ail (an) W ..= ..C., ..• ‘4. %,.....-.2 0,......44,,,-,,',....41 ,........... 0.. / / -17 0 cc ,,,,,,...-,.., ...-,...,.........,,ca 4....... All' . .ir.0" ,/ AL.,uff.......v.,...•,N,•He,.....,,......M1da,,'....."1,6,33.,.a.4,-. i'. lipr .. i , 1 c---, ,--_.±-_,- ---- ( (...) 1.11 Af:• - / A,.... 4te>, IL .:o SHRUB PLANTING DETAIL ft. cecb, , ., ,/,,,/ / G , , IIIIIIII. --;„•_:,-_-- .,:„ 0 , 1 r.Orki • 0, Alit .. . -g'...-^,e,......7,..,••••••• ,_;.4,,,- . , 1 1,.040 IR, UJ cc .„, ., ........,,,.........1, ,•-."' / ci.., / a .mr.243 1.... ..:7. ‘:147,..1"4160 . ..-.12..:93 . ‘...; ..i.• 4 / / / , 6 ii ' • ' I . ra ,CI ... * ,-;•:_,:_ ., ,..v.„.",...., A , / // ''/ 41 \ s rt 10 0... 0 '''''''''.. . ...• - -,-- 1.1 • we „ fik :=7. - • /A, • • /4 I'• .....4.19 1 III'''''rern-rr•-re-rrer." ' c.., F. 01 0 \ exedlli \' •\ Ae-, .or, , .;' • ....,,... li 15 1; 1,10.$i•rie a , . . ,• \ • \ \ \ .. • Nk4.9,\ . • . j i i :_, /0 / 'if • ifr\\, , \ • . ,, • , • \ lA 2 - , LIF€111 • r I. 0) .:111,!: ,...,..., ,i.i :II •,6 Ma• ,, ! •..VP.•$r".1., ' L. ,-0 OVA 004,Y, if...,‘., ...-•.1 I. ,., 1,,\,,0 6•re. _. . v.: \174 et C / 81, • i I I Li iTt __4_, -: ---,----1 4, • • • • • - ' 1 FP { 0 t CO all .„ ,... ../ LJAHrierlo• :I •'Get.,•-• • - .--X".71, .._i \ ..W,A.,,••• . . . • 14m101.11.1.011. MITILLIS MM. _•. 't• -0.fititlio,Toeso .11.01_..lik xi L- ; Eit,ISITq Pt-Ali _____ _ •--4-: r;J: %/ :•0 . ,,AT:'?g, •• . '•••••1 ,c.....• • J ace th 5 W 9VM 7/718.07 .i CI,TY CY REM oh E311 @ 0 W I DEC 30 198 BUILD NG/ZON1NG L ,.._ ---....... _,_ _.... . , . ' IN:: : ! i • 1111 I '• in • ' • • • . • . ' EN OE • • • • • , , ME..i. IN • ' 0 i Mai • 1 I i III i . . 1st: 0 111 1111 • • , 4 • .•- - I--- 1•11 • . r 111 . ---- , . . 0 : - •1 ,. 1 .. ' * 40 • i z 1' • 0 • I] -- ,41D.• . 1;.._ li-----.--1 ADD • in: 1 i<t). !UM rmiliill 1 I 0 t• Is , pi f-.. . • . . . 7,1i1-, ITT a • us 1 N-1 ■ • ii• In 1 i ..__ • • • . • a • !ISI la . ' V 4 — •, 11-_- ILI III 0. Irro ii IN, II 1 — III MI M 11 - ' 111 E - . • .t, D , IIII .11 111 1 ) - - lit! i. . - NI . NMI r .. : i .. • , . „ i„ q,,, .. .: •i . . 0 , A 'i• MI II ' iiV..ilii•iii og'r' cm lug i 0 51, • . '" ii. • I tz 1 i 1 IIIE IN 1 647 Jig 1111• , 11111121111 111111111111 -L -----^' • T1- I . . 1 e 0111:111 IMEMI_ r --- - I ...mum= 1 . 111 . , , =Riad . , 0- ; • o . 0 o klti 1 i . : . . . 1 .. ...- . i * 7 .... FACUTY FOR - BOEING ELECTRONICS COMPANY - RENTota,WASN/NOTON ;.- • 1 I 1 - '-. r- . ... E O IQ O ___-----1--T . 1 II !I i a x I 1 1.1 { • C • i ' I >. i fi z le a =_ 3 �Pf••RTI.a•_ c oor_ r_...J s C.) U) w .Key.;..v rH.fir-. - U C 1 { , � I . I 1 , � i • �. i , i ..i 1 -1_-[._ 11 1 ;,-; I • ! i i� r - W _L. _--_..--r- I •,-t-r- I- f -- - - = -- i -.` w -, J-r r 1__ + _ - So....17H E:E- .-r -.l-..or u.ew.rt - m U . Q :_. I 1-4--q I.. 1 _iiiiI11 [ 11 :___,_1_ 1 • 1 IT :. Li 11 I .- I L 1.._._1_1' I Y -- - - WA yr CLE won o•1. T1IiJm ' rm 1 it ' - 1i TII .1 mot..._ --__- -9.1 s.. __.._ --.z_�-IOT-I E Lt.i...T'O-J A V REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIV ION : Wa d 1� �� . , p /�!�j'APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS . Ei NOT APPROVED • • • 1- cklec,Q I -obteK • • •• • • • l � `6 DATE: SIGNATUUE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE • REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 MEMORANDUM• ' I • January 8, 1986 • TO: Environmental Review Committee FROM: Ed Hayduk, ''i Parks and Recreation Department SUBJECT: Environmental Checklist Review Sheet Site Plan Approval Orillia Property Associates, Limited Partnership (Boeing Electronics Company) • The Department of Parks and Recreation has reviewed Orillia Property !I Associates' plans to construct two buildings on the north side of S.W. 39th Street. First of all, this department is concerned that the great amount of construction' in the Green River Valley is not only impacting our present park system but will eventually result in , the need for construction of a major park in the area as well as a system of trails for jogging and walking. The City's Comprehensive Park and Recreation Plan (1984) states as a major need for the Green River Valley, "The City should monitor • development of the area for potential joint recreation efforts with the private sector". We feel that because of the large number of employees to be housed in the noted two buildings as well as adjacent office buildings to be constructed, and because of the site's proximity to the Springbrook Creek Greenbelt and Pedestrian Easement, the Orillia application offers an excellent chance to begin to meet the obvious need for recreational opportunities. We, therefore, recommend the following: 1. The applicant should install some type PP of on-site recreation to serve the entire Boeing complex. This can be either located inside one of the buildings (exercise room, gym area) or outside (tennis courts, basketball court, etc.) as well as an outdoor picnic • area. w MEMORANDUM Environmental Review Committee January 8, 1986 Page Two 2. Additionally, the applicant should install an eight foot wide asphalt trail (per Park Depart- ment standards) along the east side of Spring- brook Creek from Oaksdale Avenue to S.W. 34th Street. Additionally, two benches should be installed along the trail (per Park Department standards) and twelve trees at locations chosen by this department. The trail will accommodate jogging and walking for employees and will eventually be extended in both directions and can potentially hook up to the P-1 Channel system of trails. EH:ms cc: John E. Webley, Director of Parks & Recreation • [ecREVIEWING.';DEPARTMENT/DL.IVISION • : '-.&•R^ .H c ' >' .APPROVED` ( -'-`F . ;: ROVED::• WITH CONDITIONS • : i NOT• APPROVED g,:_ _, S4e;6:;z //os,✓ w!�aC, arm k r • r ." II D it / ,,r��:;,�,��,-<;;;�,.. . , .. . , , .:f... ._ . DATE. /~ ,3 �' G� f ?-5SIGNATURE.•,,OF.. DIRECTOR :.OR,.AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE v� S'.�:.• �h""�i.' a.�i�?s4' it. yr_:+,.L.:�;v.'.°it2�i:_ R,.:-6. tv£7r.!i•�;'. • - - .t ,9. :,!:wY1Mr:,9. ....6,4-...:' .N,.4- .,tr ,.ry P..,.��i'r•1.'�.. �; .n �r�:r• . -,1 :.: • REV 1810N n.it S,. �':�1.. _K� �:1�.�� ••4�" Yt1f•r.�'.., F 0' a k::�� c� 'it ;i. r -.• Vic. ••>•.a'y•-•::{. ;: o.- :.�:: ;•a't+` Form REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : El APPROVED Ej APPROVED WITH CO ITIO NOT APPROVED , l im JR_ svm.SUBJECT TO �-O TS 7 �O C,e S LATE N AGREEMENT-WATER A/C. Al ©J145 AA°'4u , L4.4-47 i- ° S LATE NEU AGREEMENT-SEWER 1 Alt) 1 • SYSTEM t>�EtOPMENT CHARGE-WATER ,y s $0.0¢/S0.AT: 1T 3•/61 9, 3.45 , SYSTEM BEYEUPMENT CHARGE-SEWER; V, 5 gel.GJ¢/cD.F1; L'r 7- 287, 34f ' ,, SPECIAL A NT AREA CHARGE-WATER No 4s-r�, L?7 d'X off _ - ,Say. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AREA CHARGE-SEWER cj APPROVED WATER PLAN yEs APPROVED SEWER PLAN V, APPROVED FIRE HYDRANT LOCATIONS BY FIRE DEPT. YES ,�FIR!: f QRPLYSIS _ NO _ 1 41111111° DATE: / O �CD SIGNATURE OF D ;•ECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT DIVISION : �� - E / , 1 0 APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS E:I NOT APPROVED ',"tirl'C'-g?e::*•.:7-../ • 6 4.7 . - • ' ,....4.0.--7 --7-----(-.e--2-:-;(7/ 1a- DATE: /b��C� SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE flAPPROVED Ei APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS 0NOT APPROVED . /e Gd141 c4 (A.) �4J g Q i p c 'L?' l r---o2p/2"( s--DX - I— -Jo fell /Au /JCn C A/v 4 L. '''( i ''/) . / ..'. %' :— { �LI%% DATE: ./ --S SIGNATURE -'RECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVI ION : /`«� APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS 0 NOT APPROVED p7/eA" S e;c v/�F, Gur?TEf_- ,E'cr✓-,e-L, • •"-/ 7WE' /c-/kr.t _Z) it 77, . 3 PA:.) 6e " 7,/e/S /?/U �evc''r_`-1 S /e .4es % /.11�/�y5'.: Xt P,e 0 o I iqr- ikee"sf -77 /4 . f.e.--: 0--f e Ac.' c /*eV © i<J /0/a-/Js . - 4,47 _ DATE: -^./ -/s1 ___;',/7/5i SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : POLIO( cAO V&LJF/fl N7- 0 APPROVED El APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED -/14.1'r 644`444, 4-*1-e-e--`24 -7514-4,2-aekeiv--4-e.r.-e---al .e2 : /),?-km. 4 ,;,.., tiii.,-,w_ ,...4 ee-49-yrr,Ly - ' teiJ eZ.,da-e-e-e-4-4401'\ ...5kez.4-dee- A . Z- . 21--. 0.Ilign/N . cg5tat.,,,„v,,,,d og- "ce-ie44.5,.4 A Nai 4_,,f/m4.4.? A $,,0 3 Eke E p . z isit ; A.,,, — �(.' "1 a,s„ / licp,;0' -d ' . .6a.a alp A eL,Y,Lip;,„„Q- 44; aLeine.et-±Arri . DATE: l 7/g6— SIGNATURE OF DIREC�1OR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE ^ 1005N CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST NO.: ECF-124-85 APPLICATION NO(s).: SA-106-85 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Application for site plan approval to allow the construction of two buildings totaling 153,300 square feet of office space on the 10.48 acres of property. PROPONENT: Orillia Property Associates, Limited Partnership LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Located on the north side of S.W. 39th Street at the 800 block. LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton, Building and Zoning Department. The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable , significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. Additional conditions were imposed as mitigating measures by the Environmental Review Committee under their authority of Section 4-2822(D) Renton Municipal Code. •Responsible Official: Environmental Review Committee • City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055 Phone: 235-2550 APPEAL: You may appeal this determination in writing to Renton Hearing Examiner no later than January 27, 1986. You should be prepared to make specific factual objections. Contact City of Renton, Building and Zoning Department to read or ask about the procedures for SEPA appeals. DATE OF DECISION: January 8, 1986 PUBLICATION DATE: January 13, 1986 / 407/L A kW onald G. Nelson Vrry M. - 1r nger Building and Zoning Director Policy Dev •pme Director Richard C. H hton Public Works irector 2164Z NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENT ON HEARING EXAMINER RENTON, WASHINGTON A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS ON THE SECOND FLOOR OF CITY HALL. RENTON. WASHINGTON ON JANUARY 28, 1986, AT 9:00 A.M. TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS: ORILLIA PROPERTY ASSOCIATES, LIMITED PARTNERSHIP Application for site plan approval to allow the construction of three, two-story office buildings totaling 178,605 square feet on an 11.74 acre site, file number SA-100-85: located at the northwest corner of Lind Avenue S.W. and S.W. 39th Street. • ORILLIA PROPERTY ASSOCIATES, LIMITED PARTNERSHIP Application for site plan approval to allow the construction of two buildings totaling 153,300 square feet of office space on 10.48 acres of property, file SA-106-85: property located on the north side of S.W. 39th Street at the 800 block. Legal descriptions of the files noted above are on file in the Renton Building and Zoning Department. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT THE PUBLIC HEARING ON JANUARY 28, 1986, AT 9:00 A.M. TO EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS. PUBLISHED : January 17, 1986 Ronald G. Nelson Building and Zoning Director CERTIFICATION I, JEANETTE SAMEK-MC KAGUE, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THREE COPIES OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENTS WERE POSTED BY ME IN THREE CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED ABOVE AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW. ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a • Notary Public, in and for the St to of Washington residing in P5tiJTa/ on the r7 O day of January,Ja 1986. adad1.4e) 1ciOL SIGNED: ‘aialkYlLiAnti"-) 4 ----:•,:;--,44,..-77.--1-4,,,T•7,..irrn4•4q",-.1.rz44:-.777:47,7,-",,,r•;,,--7,147,7r4,,:-.Tr•m.77.77mor::;,77,77.777.77,77,77"7 -,1,--Ar.- . '',=.,r,-.!.2.'s"--',."---- -.'' -• ,• .,...1 • .• .' • : , .. ' „;„ -, ,1?1,;!;•,-::' ..'k,,,,:::.e ..•:-.. •. -,i' ; ,' ,,,.:,, •-.C.1-14‘41%'',1`, ,.,:f 4. . .,, , •.:. ,, . . •• ',1 4,• '1,••;1,h,,,..":'.[A,„,,,',„:„',1,-,.-4,'vli'.;,:!;, , . .,, : • • . , . , • . • , , . . . :- ,,,,,;.-;,,1,,,li'1 ' ,••••',4 ' •• •' . ,1,', •r"4,,, ,s4t4,74;'%:•.•••',•,1,•:•.::`,'1',:' 1 '.• t••.., '• . oT ,,R 4, - '•:•:. L':'.H. ' ; •:;".',';.:, ' ‘'.',':•30.•y's; '',:.'...,);. ,',- .;' l' ' . , (..,,,,,t...,4.,A•=.11.;,17;2,.1.. ,....-... , • , A . ' ''• 4/ . • '1.' ''1,:.,,P-.,..“. •:. " ' i, ,,,--- - i'tett)iri‘!,.0•'-.''• 1 '" ---... 1-,•'. IN,,,„ ,,..,4.,4,4;,,,?„,,,,,,,,,- ,-...‘,„A ' . ,._, 1,,`,,,,,.,„ ,. '..-,.,•,.,:. ' • '.. - ,'VY',:',,,.-- . '-,'2' •,.1' . 3,444.1,14 - " , .., ...., et _.,...i.t•$-:,-a, 0 fy,.1 ' ^ ' ,- •,,,•.._. ., C.; tO'''O'''' Z ,,,,,., • ,..i,•' •••,.:!'....1%.4`• • .4 ''''''••, ::2 4,...';''''.14:;.;! • . ..,,,, --;tlt...• .''' '.-- I,''• - , • ;a ... .4 « . a 't• " •••••'•11-1.1.".:- ' 1 .-1. „"i eill. r-,, ' ,. R A..,:,,,.; , ,4 ••.; - , ", ,,,4 0 GILD I t."" .., t,,,,,,a .1••t ' ' . ••' '.- ! '''t.t..",'"..4.-'7:•:E''.-'"'*'‘," •' •",.".'":.."' . a..1.•a!," . 'S) CO' •• '':t1 •-ac„, ,a 1, ^• :2lit, , SEP1 , ' • 1 ''''',fr4 ,,,t- -`,.c11: ;' 1::',i1r: i•; ,•N:t, ! , ..'''. '.:- ' -V,:.•,(1-'44',r'fi'.:1?Y•!:'...•"`;','', ! ' , • 1;:1' ! '',i,V.Iitf', i'..- W.;"i' i 4'.,ti:j•'',..':.i:',).• ''',:''Z''..firi. ° • ' ai; L. . . 'City of Renton end Use Hearing:1. - xam,!ner • •. , ... .,, ::,,,,,...4-41,0, • • , • 'ilY'C. ' '''•WI 11 'hold a • ''''. ,!.-!',1.-,,,:l.:,7i.,,,c..,i—.:-:. • i! , . ,.. . , , - . •:, , „.„ , .v. %,„..,.-,,,, 1,.,..' .„,„ .,-,..,'A,, • . . • ,,fg.„,!, ''::, .-; , ;'•.::i.,...',:e2, i'...;1.1, I- , ..,, ,. ' :..k.:•1:e: ..: .:j'' 11.: '''7:4: ''Ziii': ;11. : .'6: ,4, i I ...A.i :':' • • '..1t; •',, '11 i frg•Ar'. 'N,,, ...,i4"•,; .. - •IR r, • , •t•,e'• •:••••4••:;:•• •, t•, ••-;, •,i,,,... 4 t 4.:04•4' I r;',•• '4,I,• -.:-• , ,7,•‘.,t, .' • '-., :$^ ....-A ,, ‘..t=x. ..,': i'•0 , •• ';'::,:::,,,' ci,s',4' -,-, ,r2'. •, ?go, •,,,:- : : 'p.,,,v . ,t, ,..-, ' 'ii ' 'ft-,',',-,„ '..,;;v;i : v ,I• - :q 3,, ,. 7,!•3•4 -.0.; , .pL."" • •••"•7 .1';„. „.4, •.'q'•,",1".'' ‘...X.,`.• ;i•I` ,.' .1.y ;.•;.i,7.,.%,..,,04 ,,,,,,,)- ' ;.j S'., ',:',1 IV ,,, .44 '•.' , AL.' -t ,p,,,4' , .,'."'' ,.':4-,r. Yk.i..,.'" 4,4:., ','1•,' : ,'t., ‘,,,`„4;' fa),t .: ', ,'^t e.,","F :"' ',, .„i',• •L. 1.. '-';;:'"a.- •^•• ..‘"I ''k,,•• e-.44. ;%,, ,;•., '• .;.4: ,.4;f1' '•''', 1.:.• t f[r".:W ''• ',.;.', • ''' .• , •t , ,4, :144' 1 ;.7-••.'..t4't' :4 , 1 4 ft'l•'''''' •'''' '''•''" ";i'• ..e.. Y.,"•:•'''• ''c?' ., tt'•"• ' '"4 ,.• . •'.'.., 1,1- • ,' ,,.;•.. ; -., !' '' "••• 1 1 !: :.L, 1 ,, .:.,-,..' , -,... :. " 11::. :., •';',1=1 ::V. ..'f-, ."'.,' ';'.!.'., . -:.- ', , .,-,-; l' . • 1.s,1„%Y'''•%"1."4•-,•;,,• •ri',j•,1',•,'!.•••.'..4;;';I,i;':',""o4r1 1": .4:-,:••,1:1i,.:.d,tr. 0 '.,''• '..:•',-7.•-•,, 'iIAi. ..•. •• :!r• .'' •••-•••".' .••'•'•••'';•4:t:,••,I,V=I,4• .'t ti,,..... , ,1/ :,,•• :',0‘1 • ITKC4i.N.P.1'.t'•,:i ‘.',' i I, ' t1•1, • ,•• , .-.••,.\.'••"VI;1 , ,1 ' . '•• 1 ••,,,'„•,•I ' . • . . ,''' .;;,:.i." : • 1 •••,\,:11,41 . • •.1 '.'•.i;•'• nll'At.fop?...i ., •. • ,.Y.A.:,, , . . - . y P - .. ! r.',1 :1,..' ' . . it T .,.." ..' ,1,' • ..,,,,„.,.„,,,,,,,•:„.„,..;..„.,. ,-„, ;,-.,-.. 1 •.,,[,,,,3f.i.,l'-'' ' • ,.,:;',:,;.: • . ''.:: -I:''',."':'... : ' ''CI T YC OU N CI Li.C H A M B E R S 9 CI, •,.. • ,.-•.Y,., 1.,.11AL L':.:.';::1,.... , • I;.;;',40:444filint;.4..,V.,,4g::•.kl'i::::.i*il',,. . ' •'':v•; • . ; ' ,I• ' •''. :'•'. :•,''",• . :1: OR4 '.. . i 1 ;'''A.'.. :q• ' I.,•,4.eiV.,q1... - :,- '..,4:-....;;-;."..,. . . . • . .., . c,•-•,,i,',1ii.liy,.., .-J-11,...-i;•!',!.4,.. ,,',1-,..;: ;'. .1.., ,i,.,i,...q .,,i,.-, .. . • P•M• ON . , .;. ,..' JANUARY 20, ,•19 0 • ' a6 , . ,...,,,,,,,,, ' '' '' ''' '' BEGINNING AT 9',:'0 0"''"'ll'''''A''M ' ''. _ • . ,, ,••••, ,,,,,,. ., ' ,y.,. .,.;•!;•.•,,.... , i,11:, .:n 'Ili:. ' , ir.--.:,..,...iivii,1,,,Jzzit,.::,,,,iri• iy•qh..,A,z,,,„ ‘.'7.,?,'1..P1,1,,,,,41%,in,,,,- •,i. t., 4.. • ' ., ' ' : l':I:''''' ;,'I il ; 11 41 ilj ' '',1,,-1,,,,,t.,‘ds,,-.4,.•••••••:. ,...., 4 - • 1.,•1:::Ill•:`pl'•'••:'•i:•4A41.0.1'..4 •RI-4,•••!•„... ip I , ,., 'q :14 C.;11.14 .4 :^ "': . .',... n R,, .,,,.,„ !NG ,, ... ..41.1..!'ir' ,ifiNtiri'l.'" q•n,•,'A. a, •;!, -. :,. , .cp, -...,....,,,1 .i, ;;•, -it,4:;44--).'fi'Mli'.,:-;:-T''sL•} I 1 ? :,..,•,4,,.. L.,, 11 . a . • ' .a: .,.:11.,..!„ l[ctiiV:.;i:!''.; '^ "if,ill''., • I • „ . ;1 . ; ., i, To , ,..,,,,..fi-7,:.?..1,:i,::;,v,:..iity,,,I:,.,. ,:;,.ii. ... El ,, t, . . ,. Imi-EZ . , ' E . From ..". :''l ' 1 0,'': ;1'1'0,1 a,j'P.,'".„',1','‘ , ; ' il. : 1!),,, •,,,! , ''110W',.;' :.f,,WAI,D.. .t'""..1; i'. • '• . LII ,i,''‘. '- ,..,1 t, I 1 • i',1 ', •, ‘i, • :•;;;CI,1,,I) R : : IT ,..; ii '.,..„ F.; L / L,CONDITIPNA1- ! . . , c,„,., ! •,..,J,'- ,,;•,;,4„1-T q,•,! • ,,), siv.,.•,i•, , ,,,,, 1 •,,.;,111. . ts.,,•,:p 1!,,,,..s.,?,,,,..,i,,.1,,..,11.1, 1 1 . i"''.• ,4°,,,!1.I ',.•:. ,', ,.1:,,. .piit,,, • ,, 1,dir:., •••,ih-*:.'”q 1:1i .;q; I 4,,,:.,,,,,01.„, ,,..+.„,,,,:,,,,,.„..-.4,,:•,.,,T, , • ,,. k ,-,, .,,, ,.. .,....,r•'.'!.• o , ...:,„..,, „.„,,,,, .‘,.. •Ks44, . . , '' 1•4:' ;),.•Ii:';i4,14, .. .f41.p•I',,,:,••• •.••:...4r,., • • 0,',71 •,':,,O.I•i'• .:'..1. '!•,.,'IY.•11., ,, • •.;,k, ;'?,44'Im..''' '7418:4P41,0 Y.... . ,• ' .,1,•;: ,,•,,,4`, ',.I'.1 .410:1; , ',:a": i fl:Srai,r-::,4."-t,V i&L,,Ipl. ,',.'-''4-'':';'',: . • .1.1 K., ,,, ,, • ".• ,' .1.i.,11' • • L" SA-106-85".. 1:',,ilitill;•;1/4;,'-'1,'..P•gfiqr4.1ii;:;'''' — Q11 t, E ,:i. p„.., Roy), x Ai- t .t v . ii, ,,, , ;gy( 1,,.:: , :: ..1...,,,,,orm4,... ., .:1-0,.f';', 4: •• ..;•,•'', i I Ai'. •111.:F. , ,i',:‘1.. ' ^ f? ...VNtitiji,:t , v,,-;,,I.:f4,.V.i:,,,Jili.':'::=1,1114,1;, ' , limi 11 0 it E . 'i 4 e. ,44,1 A,'':,T1• i sH,1„RT ,..- . LATSUBDIVISIOW,..,...,,;.„,...",,,.-,....:.",, ,'.",'•• 1,'• 1!!_-,,,.1;,,.)...tl, .4••!!•,i'll[514.1^,,.,,, ••' • k rc`•', 41:•If:'' •'.! i••!.":' '• , .,'.,•, ,, .''i., , -,,:,41,:;11:,!::;, ,41i.,•'! ' , '•;,i* .•• 1..,C`• . i'8, ,,,,vcitc,-4.,,,,,',.•.., •1 . ! ,,,,,,,, • • . . •• •,",, :• • i' ,,..„„rat sir.," .. lc, :. , Li r., , , . . a ,.• , i:. tp,,,,i,• .,1,,,,,t N ..c. ,- -::. _.. uNIT...,..,1,,.1 Mir IC,LOP111416,;;•, ,.,i,..I , •,,,,,,,.•,r,,,,,,,,,,„...,,,,,,x„,,,,w,ti$1,00,,,,1„,.. , .• , , .„, . .,,... -,.... ,,,,..,,,,•,.• :,,,,,.,,,..A: '',';'k i.•,,,,•i•,,,,•;.,,y,,,:•,,,,,:t..'. . . _. ,..,,,,,„,?"-k,.i.,,,,-,,,,-„T,,:i„,,...:,,,fr:-,,..,,,,,,*„-,4*)%•1!„.• • ,i 1 i . ,...,,...,,,....„.„..„,.4, ..;..., ., , • ,,,,,.!,, ,A ,,,•;-,i,..,,,, •`.c•••,:.,,y::•.,:!-;q::0„ .cil'i'g' . , ,,.:',.....,•.•.-,.,.,',,,,,,,•,,... .•.'., ,..,-..-...,.,.:,,,,4,,,,.x•.,,..q1••.40i,i;0,,.i4,,t,lp,"•,•:,,,,,•y',,'.•',,-,,,;•,.•.•J."°,.•.,.,••..",,;-;.':•...,,,,•ni,•;d•%:.:,„•;•..••..'i,;4...4,•,,•,:,.'•;, 0 -V1A , 4 . — -• ' , 1,. ?ri - ,•,•.•,"•pi, • :,,.,•••.,.„',,,'.•.,.,,',• ....,,•.•, ,• , ,.•, •••' •....'•."•-',, ,c ; t \,,,,,,',-1,,,.:.A•:.,4 ;, - , i•••'3,.,,-.,vA„1,,4.;:,?1;:,*4;,.',„,.,.1,.pi0„,:g,.;57„0',:0,14o:t-1.7.7..2,4;1•4.,.,104,.,,-i!t7,.,,•rq:,),f,,,,Ai,A,J,:,o.•,10,fo,,1,Lr,„p,4,r,,-...:*t,1%y,p44,.4\.,"r-:t,,,i.k4,f1•.1ii•yiL,A;ti4-,,r,,pmi,-,,k,s,ili,y,,ff,p,4i,,r.g3f,p,;.v•4i:p,,-g,,o,,,o,•.a,,tp,c,f..?y,,.;fr:,1'.,1s1,gY:i1:-41:i:,.,k,-,k.,:•r'•,:•,,Tt,•:,.i„,.,1i1,4,c, •.. -,.•• • • •.,L—J ,,•,11;!!,$.4 14y.,,,-,',41k4•h.,.,,,:(,,,,:x.:,...:, . . ;, . ,,,i,,,d,,•:-..,.. ••: .':!, - .. ;. •,,,•••:••• • _ , .,.•,,;,.. ,,k;41. a10:, -E4,,,i-,44Tppi,,-,4, i.....?,..,,,,,.,, . , GE'.'',,,, E4.."". AL .,.AI, 1-,•"••• • • LO C AT DO N . 'A irkil El i 0 WOAD OR EBB: • . . •,,-,•••;,,,,,,,•••••.-1.., ,la.-,,,..• ••••,c • '••, . ',,•;.: ' • I • •,,,, .•i.,,,••• •,•••.•„••!•,tt:;,•:!,,.-•4,,,1,":, ••,,r.,) ., , . , ••..ci •1:,..: ..,,.,,,,:1 s• • ' , • . . • • LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF. S.W. 39TH STREET , :•,... ,,,ti: ,.' . • • AT THE 800 BLOCK , ,ci,..;, ,;-c,•,• • •I, ,,,,,... „„ . ! ..:,Pr'••4i:-- ` ," . . .• .•'.0 •`L. •,' • • • ,;•,• •'• ,, : .iri'l•rtr:' : ' • . 1., ,•,;•,i••••,, i. , ,. ,,...1. , •„!•,,,,,T . ,. • • ,• LEGAL DESCRIPTION ON FILE IN THE .RENTON.; BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT. ,, ti-4 • , .0 , !l , ), , .1 _ • . • , „J.., t`,.. ',. T.,,,, ,,,,, - I ra.::„.,,,, •,;11:‘,' Wks., . ',.1.; ', 1: ' , i .1, PA,'' L ,..ria. ." •• :,., CI , . . .. • ,i. j4,1,i117, ',4• •4-2. •14'.1 . • ,1••,,Z, I - , i — 4 •,,, , milli EL fl lin ‘.„.. ,q641, ili.3 . t A,...• ,it'•-t•',' ' A ' . „ Ma'"e: . 110;; ;;11:!...1,F,,.1.i;9 A N..r.,, alr:, '.41!.' , J;t! 1N , • .: '.,i:, (P' ',i 3,411i 4.„1.k,i, . •. . . . :•• f,';',,.', • t.;-;-1.5-1,,i. •r - ''''--• . • - ,trel,p,,,:,....• , ••.-...•.-• .,,• ::,......i.t ' ''' . •:.':'442Cilli FURTHER INFO.RMATION CALL • Till! 10 IT4,411 ,:th':14: E•N. TC)N, • \\,liiii, . '''• Y.•i,',0:- y,',!•R.-1;.;2 • •- , ''•ix. .,,Iiiiir" . GOEPARTMENT.,,:i• :55,2550 .. ..- 1.-. . . . • BUILOONG&ZgaNIN. :.; , , :..,•„. ,,),,AY,r,-.-: *42,..-,..,:,.1 - ,,.... . , • .,•'; ;,,,,,. ',4 ..„. , , . .... ,,,,,,,;',:mtl •,.:, : q..4,5:itl':,AirOff.ti t:t,,qjy..,,-;',14.,e..,;;;Nh,,,, ,, :, _ ,'.,,:i.,,,,...,k,,,,,, , . .,.i.,. ••i ,, ,, t.",,,,..,•, 11.,,. ', -.'-:!,:iiii...iia ,2-;.:m. =RA ',` ,: co 'tW ITH OUT ISA' -.io,rucrirorte,p hiridii . ,•,,it Tip,,,i. 1„..,, cp.!, /. . ,,,,,,,, , , ,, ) ••i'• ,, ,. .4,,,,4,1,,,,,!-,.. A„ ...4,4.Timil. 1,;,..-.75.1!m4,11,.V.!. 1,...,-(e,'", -' --'''.,',-,;(-?4,..4^{.,,•;;;_:,!,':;,;,3 ... 1 1, . ;0..-.P111.4.,,,:,;V!v?..' .IMF,... ,43.$4.'Irrir'''. "i'-`4, %'' "4'•••••"' '•• * ?Lin;i.4 pit oi 1.115,,,,As, , ii, ,,,,- -"•-••4•,''i'::''.1;'^,;,';!Vr..'k'''Plo'f'''''A:`,'Sb3.,f•Clie';,';'ti linign Psi_ 1 frallifirit.41.il,"9&2 Aiqr RENT1 , BUILDING & ZONING DEN +MENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 124 - RS CITY OF RENTON APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-106-85 SITE PLAN APPROVAL VI 2 1986 PROPONENT : ORILLIA PROPERTY ASSOCIATES, LIMITED PARTNERSHIP POLICY DFve LOPNIhr41 IIFP'7. PROJECT TITLE : ROFING Fl FCTRONICS COMPANY BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF TWO OFFICE BUILDINGS TOTALING 153,300 SQUARE FEET OF SPACE ON 10.48 JCRFS CIF PROPERTY_ LOCATION : LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF S.W. 39th STREET AT THE 800 BLOCK. TO : El PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 1/15/86 El ENGINEERING DIVISION 0 TRAFFIC ENG, DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : 0 UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION El FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT El POLICE DEPARTMENT m POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 0 OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P .M. ON JANUARY 9, 1986 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : PL/C'( &thea), (17- Ei APPROVED El APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED silCi/k/71 Oat,0-d 6ti-cu2.4.1/6yE2475L-71,LeaokA„4..e.,e.„.ej a.„-te : /),5 ,dA -4.„ e_ 1-o . Gt- . V-7zi-401L---, 4/)-4/14/A , cl)76.71-1,76/6-t/6-rA4zpd Ot ci4li,ce-c/1 A fUto.i 42443444 . '6 ‘ 92,6,67 , ,.. ike EcF - P tti--- I l(ll '� 11,--.4 I')� U — B , J's-1L'I - s . ',4-a i p. I/ .-1,4+,..P-/,/,' DATE : A/ger-- SIGNATURE OF DIREC OR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 RENT', BUILDING & ZONING DEPA�'=jMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW' SHEET ECF - 124 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-106-85 SITE PLj1N APPROVAL PROPONENT: ORILLIA PROPERTY ASSOCIATES, LIMITED PARTNERSHIP PROJECT TITLE : ROFTNG FI FCTRONIcS COMPANY BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF TWO OFFICE BUILDINGS TOTALING 153,300 SQUARE FEET OF SPACE ON 10.48 _1CRFS OF PROPFRTY_ LOCATION : LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF S.W. 39th STREET AT THE 800 BLOCK. TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 1/15/86 17] ENGINEERING DIVISION I=1 TRAFFIC ENG . DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : UTILITIES ENG . DIVISION 15] FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT El POLICE DEPARTMENT El POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT El OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING . PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P ,M, ON JANUARY 9, 1986 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVI ION : OAPPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS D NOT APPROVED ,_J/ ,12--x.` C' /i/ •E'er vi,�r.��,c roc 4 7 z s te-,e vi�F, Gci� ,e l/J? /.c/S � x oc-, O p /=74- P,4.�'i c�/% ,S"/�•�!N/r ' ' ' C�o scr N�c 77o NS ,PoK-, 47j/ T. � /Gfp, 1) A /'. eir,e‘ te, eA-` /0/a-ems _ DATE: - :Z& SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 RENT BUILDING & ZONING DEPA MENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 124 — Rq APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-106-85 SITE PLAN APPROVAL PROPONENT : ORILLIA PROPERTY ASSOCIATES, LIMITED PARTNERSHIP PROJECT TITLE : ROFTNG FI FCTRONICS COMPANY BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF TWO OFFICE BUILDINGS TOTALING 153,300 SQUARE FEET OF SPACE ON 10.48 _jsCRFS OF PROPERTY_ LOCATION : LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF S.W. 39th STREET AT THE 800 BLOCK. TO : El PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 1/15/86 LII ENGINEERING DIVISION ri TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : UTILITIES ENG . DIVISION n FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU El PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT EI BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT El POLICE DEPARTMENT El POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT I ( OTHERS : COMMENTS OR. SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P .M. ON JANUARY 9, 1986 , REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : B C. c n APPROVED n APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS El NOT APPROVED , 52O—r s-7"'Dz �-(--1— rl gal / /26 C I A-) 4 L. /cf%--� DATE : .7 ._ �c \ SIGNATURE RECTOR OR AUTHO IZED REPRESENTATIVE IL REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 ' RENT,- BUILDING & ZONING DEPV1MENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 124 - RS APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-106-85 SITE PLAN APPROVAL PROPONENT ; ORILLIA PROPERTY ASSOCIATES, LIMITED PARTNERSHIP PROJECT TITLE; ROPING Fl FCTRONICS COMPANY BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT; APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF TWO OFFICE BUILDINGS TOTALING 153,300 SQUARE FEET OF SPACE ON 10.48 .CRFS_ OF PROPERTY_ LOCATION ; LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF S.W. 39th STREET AT, THE 800 BLOCK. TO : El PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 1/15/86 ENGINEERING DIVISION Ei TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU 0 PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT pq POLICE DEPARTMENT POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT OTHERS ; COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 ;00 P .M. ON JANUARY 9, 1986 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION ; El APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS 0 NOT APPROVED ----76-fled/O°PP DATE : SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 ) RENT: BUILDING & ZONING DEPA AENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 124 — Pc APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-106-85 SITE PLAN APPROVAL PROPONENT : ORILLIA PROPERTY ASSOCIATES, LIMITED PARTNERSHIP PROJECT TITLE : ROFING FI FCTRONLCS COMPANY BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF TWO OFFICE BUILDINGS TOTALING 153,300 SQUARE FEET OF SPACE ON 10.48 __ACRFS OF PROPFRTY_ LOCATION : LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF S.W. 39th STREET AT THE 800 BLOCK. TO : ® PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 1/15/86 1:: ENGINEERING DIVISION 0 TRAFFIC ENG . DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : • UTILITIES ENG . DIVISION 111 FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU ® PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT El BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT ® POLICE DEPARTMENT I=1 POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT . 0 OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P .M, ON JANUARY 9, 1986 . REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION ; fl APPROVED El APPROVED WITH CO DITIO NOT APPROVED FINN AP M.SUBJECT TO 1 4075 L3 c ,3 L S I IAN a AGREEMENT-WATER N8 AI ©i zz4/4 /AtID ,P� . Ne4S 4�4O� n_ a s� WE CIES A$REEMENT-SEWER ,Np fit. SYSTEM DEIBBPMEHT CHARGE-WATER ..yEs 970. D¢fSQ. for 3-/6 g 3.�5 B7 SYSTEM DEVELQPMENT CHARGE-SEWER ,t• o.e4r/gyp p,. 1-e r 17- -2 - 3 i SPECIAL AREA CHARGE-WATER NO 45', (' ' 4,X i.g.Ori _ 43(,S3�/,4 SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AREA CHARGE-SEWER ,gyp APPROVED WATER PLAN VA:s APPROVED SEWER PLAN APPROVED FIRE HYDRANT LOCATIONS �/ 5 , BY FIRE DEFT. TFIP�F,; MUMS _. 1 - -- ! il ',;, DATE: /— p — F(O SIGNATURE OF Di •ECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVPS ON 5/1982 Fnrm 1R2 RENT BUILDING`&' ZONING.,DEPi MENT ,t „ DEVELOPMENT ',APPLICA'TION ',REVIEW SHEET. • .. , :ECF' — . !` 'tlAPPLICATION' .NO('S)'' - • `f;'°=SA = .:a,c.;SI'TE.,PLANf:'APPROVAL .,� " ; . , .x lrb.PROPONENT: "URILLIA" PROPERTY:ASSOCIATES; LIMITED ,PARTNERSHIP " . ' ,.PROJECk-,TIT.LE.'..• ,r.��,'. RQFTNf;:xfI.FCTRf1NTCS, Cf1MPANY...•µ-- • .4f = :-= , , ' .zz _ 4" . . '•,•'},it,•.5 're•; :i,iv• °r.'. #-,••'};:°. 1;v,-i,l.. L,:r.. '".,.,.`.� i x,1 r :, - : , BRIEF`=DESCRIPTI'ON=�n•OF.'.PROJECT: --`' '`APPLICATIONFOR'SITE-'PLAN'APPROVAL TO ALLOW•THE - • • - 4. :' :CONSTRUCTION.f OF..;TWO. OFFICE 1BU,ILDINGS_:•TOTAL'ING:�;153;300.-SQUARE FEET OF SPACE ON 10.48 .y. f,_CRFS OF PROPFRTY._ ..... ,.. . , .. ... - w-k , : ;•• - ' LOCATION : :,,. 2 LOCATED ON;'THE'='NORTH:SIDE-OF'.S:.W.:39tfi_;STREET;.AL.THE.800 'BLOCK: . ---- ----.- • .. ',,,. . ,�„ F?• -, :. .. t >.i .i. r,-n v: e'� . t ;:.$61, j :ti . "d- ,J '`.; - tea. li':' ` -i-''`` • .t.n -:F'isYc i a:11,-c,c3.:: • r! 'i •{ - f, • -f;,,t:S.••,•p•'c ram,. tj�', • "i 0BLIC'`W R ;"'DEAR N 'i'``,1' - 1 15 86 .,PUBLIC'' 0 KS, P THE T�' �� Yµ SCHEDULED ERC.�,DATE , / / w, . .'r:y `•,r A,e l.�d •:t.,p^:v.'K�.,pvv,., :.nu. •,:;•.t._Y:."� :k',' +.W+w M,0.46 �"Y,-;;;P'-1 .' S''' • 1 ' 4 1:, h' ENGINEERING� VI ON' r: ,::, , . , � 'El• ,.��. �� e :rti-'!..��:d"" ...,»�: `s•?:+ 1, • , 1'DTRAFF.IC `:ENG° •--'DIVIS^ION'', =-- ... --c- ..` .':SCHEDULED""HEARING 'DATE: • UTILLTIES; ENGI :DIVISION '' . , E FIRE PREVENTION . ... ,.. ..„...„.„: , BUREAU .., .,,,..:......,...,,,:-.7.:Fi;.:9- '_ . , , R _� . _.. _ _ ... . .,, ,,...,4PARKS & .REC'REATIOyN DEPARTMENT: ' i ....,•'i,../..*=''L"'"j -.'''- '.'-'... 'i .--..."..- -!.•.,-,..•-:.l,t e-, -.-,,,...-j:.,,:',..1,.,,,,,...i:iii.: '.:, ._ :„ 1. . ,?'.''.'',, :.' .',.„:,- 'T,.'' ' . .', .. ,. . .,,.: ,.!.'' .... , .. ..,. , ''L'i, 'i 'BUILDING ,'& ZONING ,DEPARTMENT,~ ` ,POLICE:.D EPA RTMENT''..., �.= :.. . .. IIPOLICYDEVEL0PMENTDARTME'T - �:-. ~ s' . . • . . „.„,,,,,.„....„.•„•,.: •, .4, • . . -• ,,. . ..... , . , • • • ,,,,,,,,,,, •...,,,,,,...„,;•.,:...•............., ,.:„.,..„,,,, , ,,„„., :.... ,. ..„ . ., , , ... ..., . . _, ' COMMENTS- OR'. SUGGESTIONS` R'EGARD,, -.,.TNG'..THIS; APPL"�ICATION `SHOULD IBE PR..,OVIDED„.- >'-'4IN WRIT'ING.' . PLEASE. PROVIDE "COMMENTSTO THE' BUILDING & .ZONING DEPARTMENT' ' 5:00' P.M. :Div '' . , . • BY 'JANUARY"'9 1986 - ,r. "REVIEWING,` DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : - ' �,l#,•?-e..e -)k.-r•'=_ •-' '. • •'..;:,;•.,, El APPROVED. '-;-.'; ;--,,,,';,;;,',...','.,,::,",,,',,:., 1...,.,.,0,r11,,,04,':..,'.''._'",'" ': .•'; APPROVED 'WI•TH• ••CONDITION,—S ''. 1' , t ,, NOT A PPR• O VE D :.p 1 r i' . .' �7 ; (fit!10 IL re,„ t .. . 1 1, • t fd/ � .- ,.'•.... .. .. ,,, . ), P . • ...::-`: ' '' V - 4'b./ V , ,.' '+ �� Ga ' � .' ' �.. .2L6 - ,, ,� Jmo ' `"i rep ' ui l-_-- - � : 7ru , apriJ✓i et G ' t // a ,w '„A' :4- ? f i . . ir',r of _ 1 ` _ a. . . . , . . '; ,,. ., ��. , -•• • . . � ATE. � = �G,,. ... . :r S,IGNATURE;,:OF,..,DIRECTOR:,,OR. AUTHORIZED -.REPRESENTATIVE:',.: t •;;i•t,,-r,i. .1`.; _ 41. _ ''j',.;:i ' ',. AAS.25'. ,4•,,� .,1. ;t'. 4,h.'.. • .., ^yW `R° V�. � N`S/ 82 •>:. EYSO � RENT( , BUILDING & ZONING DEP, -'TMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 124 - RC APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-106-85 SITE PLAN APPROVAL PROPONENT : ORILLIA PROPERTY ASSOCIATES, LIMITED PARTNERSHIP PROJECT:,TITLE ; ROFTNG FIFCTRONTCS COMPANY BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF TWO OFFICE BUILDINGS TOTALING 153,300 SQUARE FEET. OF SPACE ON 10.48 __ACRFS OF PROPFRTY. LOCATION ; LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF S.W. 39th STREET AT THE 800 BLOCK. TO : PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE ; 1/15/86 ENGINEERING DIVISION n TRAFFIC ENG . DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : [-JUTILITIES ENG . DIVISION • n FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU [, PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT ( BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT n POLICE DEPARTMENT n POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DOTHERS : COMMENTS OR' SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5; 00 P .M. ON JANUARY 9, 1986 . REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVI ION ; PNWS ® 1�pEc --TtdN1 /1%/APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS ENOT APPROVED /-� et / ] 4ckiecg 1 -obte TE ; bSIGNATNGVIR E OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE 1 b15 REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 4 + r • 1- • N OF I o THE CITY OF RENTON U MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 n BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR • PARKS and RECREATION 090 JOHN E. WEBLEY - DIRECTOR O ?S D SEPTE ' 235-2560 MEMORANDUM January 8, 1986 TO: Environmental Review Committee FROM: Ed Hayduk, Parks and Recreation Department SUBJECT: Environmental Checklist Review Sheet Site Plan Approval Orillia Property Associates, Limited Partnership (Boeing Electronics Company) The Department of Parks and Recreation has reviewed Orillia Property Associates' plans to construct two buildings on the north side of S.W. 39th Street. First of all, this department is concerned that the great amount of construction in the Green River Valley is not only impacting our present park system but will eventually result in the need for construction of a major park in the area as well as a system of trails for jogging and walking. The City's Comprehensive Park and Recreation Plan (1984) states ,as a major need for the Green River Valley, "The City should monitor development of the area for potential joint recreation efforts with the private sector". We feel that because of the large number of employees to be housed in the noted two buildings as well as adjacent office buildings to be constructed, and because of the site's proximity to the Springbrook Creek Greenbelt and Pedestrian Easement, the Orillia application offers an excellent chance to begin to meet the obvious need for recreational opportunities. We, therefore, recommend the following: 1. The applicant should install some type of on-site recreation to serve the entire Boeing complex. This can be either located inside one of the buildings (exercise room, gym area) or outside (tennis courts, basketball court, etc.) as well as an outdoor picnic area. • p r A MEMORANDUM Environmental Review Committee January 8, 1986 Page Two 2. Additionally, the applicant should install an eight foot wide asphalt trail (per Park Depart- ment standards) along the east side of Spring- brook Creek from Oaksdale Avenue to S.W. 34th Street. Additionally, two benches should be installed along the trail (per Park Department standards) and twelve trees at locations chosen by this department. The trail will accommodate jogging and walking for employees and will eventually be extended in both directions and can potentially hook up to the P-1 Channel system of trails. EH:ms cc: John E. Webley, Director of Parks & Recreation FORM 115 OT I C E . NM ENTAL a., DEC ,. is A ATI APPLICATION NO. ECF-124-85 & SA-106-85 PROPOSED ACTIN APPI ICATION FOR SITF PI M APPROVAI TO Al I OW THF CONSTRUCTION OF TWO BUILDINGS TOTALING 153,300 SQUARE FEET OF OFFICE SPACF ON THF 10,48 ACRES OF PROPERTY, GENERAL LOCATION AND OR ADDRESS PROPERTY LOCAIEU ON THE NORTH SIDE OF S.W. 39TH STREET AT THE 800. BLOCK POSTED TO NDTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS ' OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE 'CE.R.C.) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION 0DOES ®DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. AN ! ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT DWILL MWILL NOT BE REQUIRE 6 . THE CITY OF RENTON WILL NOT ACT ON THIS PROPOSAL FOR 1 S DAYS FROM THE DATE BELOW. COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY AN APPEAL OF THE ABOVE DETERMINATION MAY BE FILED. WITH THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER BY 5:00 P.M., JANUARY' 27, 1986 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT 235-2550 DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHOMI7_ATIDN • .11j05N CITY OF RENTON • DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST NO.: ECF-124-85 APPLICATION NO(s).: SA-106-85 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Application for site plan approval to allow the construction of two buildings totaling 153,300 square feet of office space on the 10.48 acres of property. PROPONENT: Orillia Property Associates, Limited Partnership LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Located on the north side of S.W. 39th Street at the 800 block. LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton, Building and Zoning Department. The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. Additional conditions were imposed as mitigating measures by the Environmental Review Committee under their authority of Section 4-2822(D) Renton Municipal Code. Responsible Official: Environmental Review Committee City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055 Phone: 235-2550 APPEAL: You may appeal this determination in writing to Renton Hearing Examiner no later than January 27, 1986. You should be prepared to make specific factual objections. Contact City of Renton, Building and Zoning Department to read or ask about the procedures for SEPA appeals. DATE OF DECISION: January 8, 1986 PUBLICATION DATE: January 13, 1986 A 11.. Ronald G. Nelson 'rry M. • nger A Building and Zoning Director Policy Dev •pme• Director Ric and C. H j-•hton Public Works 'Director OF R4, 11, A $ ® ° BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT z � o RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR o LIMP MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 • 235-2540 0,9gT�Q P� 40' SE • BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR MEMORANDUM • DATE: January 13, 1986 TO: Fred J. Kaufman, Hearing Examiner FROM: Environmental Review Committee SUBJECT: Orillia Property Associates, Limited Partnership FILE NUMBER: SA-106-85 ECF-124-85 LOCATED ON: the north side of S.W. 39th Street at the 800 block. The Environmental Review Committee (ERC), under their substantive authority [Section 4-2822(D)] recommends to the decision maker, the Hearing Examiner, that the application for site plan approval to allow the construction of two buildings totaling 153,300 square feet of office space on 10.48 acres located on the north side of S.W. 39th Street at the 800 block is subject to the following conditions: 1. Installation of intersection improvements at Lind Ave. S.W. and S.W. 39th Street including a traffic signal and lane widening per Public Works Department approval. 2. In addition to the outside eating/recreational area provided, the developer shall provide on-site recreation to either include an exercise room, gym area, or similar function inside of one of the buildings or outside a tennis court, basketball, or sports court or similar area. 3. Installation of off-site recreational improvements along the east side of Springbrook Creek from S.W. 34th Street to S.W. 41st Street to include (1) 12-foot wide asphalt trail capable of supporting emergency vehicles built to both Park's and Public Works' Department standards, (2) two benches, and (3) twelve trees to be located by the Parks Department. • Fred J. Kaufman, Hearing Examiner Re: Orillia Property Associates„ Limited Partnership File Number: SA-106-85/ECF-124-85 January 13, 1986 Page 2 4. The Public Works Department shall submit to the ERC by January 27, 1986, an area-wide traffic and circulation study bounded by South 180th on the south, SR-167 on the east, SR-181 on the west, and I-405 on the north, along with the extension of Oakesdale Avenue S.W. to SR-900. The study shall identify (1) a circulation system adequate to accommodate motor vehicle traffic locally generated in the study area at build-out office park intensity, (2) the total estimated cost of that system; (3) the total trip generation associated with said office park development, (4) an estimate of the per trip cost of constructing the system, (5) a list of those elements of the system which have already been constructed or committed to by pending developers and who receives credit (on a trip basis) for the cost of that construction; and (6) a prioritization of the construction projects needed in the immediate future to minimize the impact of developments currently being proposed in the study area. 5. Participation in area-wide traffic improvements identified by the above traffic study to the project's proportionate share based upon estimated daily traffic generation as calculated by standards established in the Institute of Traffic Engineers Trip Generation Manual. The ultimate costs per vehicle trip shall not exceed $175 per trip. (Estimated 1,840 vehicle trips). 6. Credit for adjacent signalization at S.W. 39th Street and Lind Avenue S.W. will be credited against the project's projected proportionate impact and for other scheduled area-wide improvements if the applicant proceeds to complete instead of the City constructing those improvements. The Environmental Review Committee finds that the following facts are true of the proposed project: 1. The addition of 1,840 vehicle trips to the anticipated 2,144 vehicle trips associated with Phase I construction and a 980-space parking lot that provides 70% of the parking for the adjacent 266,000 square feet of office to the south is significant and requires mitigation. The project represents approximately 30% of all anticipated traffic on S.W. 39th Street. 2. The addition of approximately 1,000 employees to the planned 2,500 employees in the adjacent 7 other office buildings creates a dramatic need for year-round on-site recreation. The outdoor eating area attempts to address some of the recreational needs of the on-site employees, but it focuses only on one aspect -- lunch. Other recreational activities must be introduced to serve the anticipated recreational needs of the employees. 3. The adjacent pedestrian corridor to the west along Springbrook Creek has been designated for public pedestrian use. Since it is an adjacent public right-of-way, it should be developed at the time of any development of any of the adjacent properties. Fred J. Kaufman, Hearin_ ,aminer Re: Orillia Property Associates„ Limited Partnership File Number: SA-106-85/ECF-124-85 January 13, 1986 Page 3 4. The City of Renton must identify area-wide traffic circulation and improvement needs to provide continued public accessibility to individual privately owned properties. Without this formal identification by the City, the general level of service will continue to decline as a result of incremental adverse impacts resulting from private development. 5. The previous traffic evaluation conducted late in 1984 was based on a land use assumption of a much greater percentage of warehouse use and a lower intensity of office park uses. Actual and proposed development is office park in nature and this use generates significantly more traffic in addition to the general shift in type of vehicle trips. As a result a revised traffic study is necessary to reflect changing circumstances. 6. The total anticipated development by Boeing Electronics Company, Boeing Computer Services, and Boeing Commercial Airplane Company within the general traffic study area represents a known impact of 1.1 million square feet of office space and possibly 6,500 employees. This represents a doubling of 1984 employment in the study area. Therefore, the Boeing Corporation is a major contributor to present impacts and the ultimate impacts of full industrial development of the study area. The Boeing Corporation must therefore be a significant contributor to the solution. Therefore, the above conditions are necessary as a minimum for the preservation of the welfare and safety of the general public and a minimum to mitigate the adverse environmental impacts of the proposal. Under Section 4-2822(D), the decision maker must accept these conditions as binding upon his ultimate decision unless he identifies in writing a substantial error in facto or conclusion by the Environmental Review Committee. The decision maker then has the option of asking the ERC for reconsideration or revising the conditions. The applicant also has the ability to request reconsideration of these conditions from the ERC or appeal these conditions directly to the Hearing Examiner under authority granted in Section 4-2823(A)(1)(a) within 14 days of the date that the DNS is final. Therefore, the appeal date would be Monday, January 27, 1986, at 5 p.m. Appeals must be submitted in the form prescribed by both the Environmental Ordinance of the City of Renton and the Hearing Examiner Ordinance, Section 4-3011(B). RJB:wr:ss 1009N cc: (1) Edward Heavey (2) Robert Morgan, Corporate Manager Orillia Property Associates, L.P. Real Property Division c/o O&W Properties, Inc. Boeing Company 201 Elliott Avenue West P. O. Box 3707 Seattle, Washington 98119 Mail Stop 13-03 Seattle, Washington 98124 :4'`1005N CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST NO.: ECF-124-85 APPLICATION NO(s).: SA-106-85 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Application for site plan approval to allow the construction of two buildings totaling 153,300 square feet of office space on the 10.48 acres of property. PROPONENT: Orillia Property Associates, Limited Partnership LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Located on the north side of S.W. 39th Street at the 800 block. LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton, Building and Zoning Department. The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. Additional conditions were imposed as mitigating measures by the Environmental Review Committee under their authority of Section 4-2822(D) Renton Municipal Code. Responsible Official: Environmental Review Committee City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055 Phone: 235-2550 APPEAL: You may appeal this determination in writing to Renton Hearing Examiner no later than January 27, 1986. You should be prepared to make specific factual objections. Contact City of Renton, Building and Zoning Department to read or ask about the procedures for SEPA appeals. DATE OF DECISION: January 8, 1986 PUBLICATION DATE: January 13, 1986 lI I Ronald G. Nelson 'rry M. nger Building and Zoning Director Policy Dev: .pme' Director . Richard C. H;iv ghton Public Works •irector OF RA, If ° BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT Z L , o RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR o MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 • 235-2540 0,9•1 Eb BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR MEMORANDUM DATE: January 13, 1986 TO: Fred J. Kaufman, Hearing Examiner FROM: Environmental Review Committee SUBJECT: Orillia Property Associates, Limited Partnership FILE NUMBER: SA-106-85 ECF-124-B5 LOCATED ON: the north side of S.W. 39th Street at the 800 block. The Environmental Review Committee (ERC), under their substantive authority [Section 4-2822(D)] recommends to the decision maker,' the Hearing Examiner, that the application for site plan approval to allow the construction of two buildings totaling 153,300 square feet of office space on 10.4E acres located on the north side of S.W. 39th Street at the 800 block is subject to the following conditions: 1. Installation of intersection improvements at.Lind Ave. S.W. and S.W. 39th Street including a traffic signal and lane widening per Public Works Department approval. 2. In addition to the outside eating/recreational area provided, the developer shall provide on-site recreation to either include an exercise room, gym area, or similar function inside of one of the buildings or outside a tennis court, basketball, or sports court or similar area. 3. Installation of off-site recreational improvements along the east side of Springbrook Creek from S.W. 34th Street to S.W. 41st Street to include (1) 12-foot wide asphalt trail capable of supporting emergency vehicles built to both Park's and Public Works' Department standards, (2) two benches, and (3) twelve trees to be located by the Parks Department. Fred J. Kaufman, Hearing Examiner Re: Orillia Property Associates„ Limited Partnership File Number: SA-106-85/ECF-124-85 January 13, 1986 Page 2 4. The Public Works Department shall submit to the ERC by January 27, 1986, an area-wide traffic and circulation study bounded by South 180th on the south, SR-167 on the east, SR-181 on the west, and I-405 on the north, along with the extension of Dakesdale Avenue S.W. to SR-900. The study shall identify (1) a circulation system adequate to accommodate motor vehicle traffic locally generated in the study area at build-out office park intensity, (2) the total estimated cost of that system; (3) the total trip generation associated with said office park development, (4) an estimate of the per trip cost of constructing the system, (5) a list of those elements of the system which have already been constructed or committed to.by pending developers and who receives credit (on a trip basis) for the cost of that construction; and (6) a prioritization of the construction projects needed in the immediate future to minimize the impact of developments currently being proposed in the study area. 5. Participation in area-wide traffic improvements identified by the above traffic study to the project's proportionate share based upon estimated daily traffic generation as calculated by standards established in the Institute of Traffic Engineers Trip Generation Manual. The ultimate costs per vehicle trip shall not exceed $175 per trip. (Estimated 1,840 vehicle trips). 6. Credit for adjacent signalization at S.W. 39th Street and Lind Avenue S.W. will be credited against the project's projected proportionate impact and for other scheduled area-wide improvements if the applicant proceeds to complete instead of the City constructing those improvements. The Environmental Review Committee finds that the following facts are true of the proposed project: 1. The addition of 1,840 vehicle trips to the anticipated 2,144 vehicle trips associated with Phase I construction and a 980-space parking lot that provides 70% of the parking for the adjacent 266,000 square feet of office to the south is significant and requires mitigation. The project represents approximately 30% of all anticipated traffic on S.W. 39th Street. 2. The addition of approximately 1,000 employees to the planned 2,500 employees in the adjacent 7 other office buildings creates a dramatic need for year-round on-site recreation. The outdoor eating area attempts to address some of the recreational needs of the on-site employees, but it focuses only on one aspect -- lunch. Other recreational activities must be introduced to serve the anticipated recreational needs of the employees. 3. The adjacent pedestrian corridor to the west along Springbrook Creek has been designated for public pedestrian use. Since it is an adjacent public right-of-way, it should be developed at the time of any development of any of the adjacent properties. Fred J. Kaufman, Hearing Examiner Re: Orillia Property Associates„ Limited Partnership File Number: SA-106-85/ECF-124-85 January 13. 1986 Page 3 4. The City of Renton must identify area-wide traffic circulation and improvement needs to provide continued public accessibility to individual privately owned properties. Without this formal identification by the City, the general level of service will continue to decline as a result of incremental adverse impacts resulting from private development. 5. The previous traffic evaluation conducted late in 1984 was based on a land use assumption of a much greater percentage of warehouse use and a lower intensity of office park uses. Actual and proposed development is office park in nature and this use generates significantly more traffic in addition to the general shift in type of vehicle trips. As a result a revised traffic study is necessary to reflect changing circumstances. 6. The total anticipated development by Boeing Electronics Company, Boeing Computer Services, and Boeing Commercial Airplane Company within the general traffic study area represents a known impact of 1.1 million square feet of office space and possibly 6,500 employees. This represents a doubling of 1984 employment in the study area. Therefore, the Boeing Corporation is a major contributor to present impacts and the ultimate impacts of full industrial development of the study area. The Boeing Corporation must therefore be a significant contributor to the solution. Therefore, the above conditions are necessary as a minimum for the preservation of the welfare and safety of the general public and a minimum to mitigate the adverse environmental impacts of the proposal. Under Section 4-2822(D), the decision maker must accept these conditions as binding upon his ultimate decision unless he identifies in writing a substantial error in fact or conclusion by the Environmental Review Committee. The decision maker then has the option of asking the ERC for reconsideration or revising the conditions. The applicant also has the ability to request reconsideration of these conditions from the ERC or appeal these conditions directly to the Hearing Examiner under authority granted in Section 4-2823(A)(1)(a) within 14 days of the date that the DNS is final. Therefore, the appeal date would be Monday, January 27, 1986, at 5 p.m. Appeals must be submitted in the form prescribed by both the Environmental Ordinance of the City of Renton and the Hearing Examiner Ordinance, Section 4-3011(B). RJB:wr:ss 1009N cc: (1) Edward Heavey (2) Robert Morgan, Corporate Manager Orillia Property Associates, L.P. Real Property Division c/o O&W Properties, Inc. Boeing Company 201 Elliott Avenue West P. O. Box 3707 Seattle, Washington 98119 Mail Stop 13-03 Seattle, Washington 98124 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SKI" REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: -P O L DATE CIRCULATED: JANUARY 2, 1986 COMMENTS DUE: JANUARY 9, 19R6 ECF - 124 - 85 CITY OF RENTON APPLICATION NO(s). SITE PLAN APPROVAL (SA-106-85) IAPI2 Mb PROPONENT: ORTIITA PROPFQTY ASSOCTATFS, ►JMITED PARTNERSHIP POLICY PROJECT TITLE: ROFTNG FI FTRONTCS COMPANY nF'lFI(1PMFMT UFPT. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO Al OW THE CONSTRUCTION OF TWO BUILDINGS TOTALING 153.300 SQUARE FEET OF OFFICE SPACE ON 10.48 ACPFS OF PROPFRTY_ LOCATION: LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF S.W. 39th STREET AT THE ROO RIOCK SITE AREA: 10.48 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross): 151,300 SQUARE FEET IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS MINOR MAJOR MORE IMPACT IMPACT INFORMATION 1) Earth 2) Air 4 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use l/ 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: re-ea RECOMMENDATION: 11 DNS Ele<TIGATED DNS (1 EIS REVIEWED By:6-Av2NUt?SUYt TITLE: ASSt‘dix..:061—Kvtele---- DATE: I 7106 FORM #14 REVISED 9/10/85 1 } . ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHL_. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: U1'1 L, I. DATE CIRCULATED: JANUARY 2, 1986 COMMENTS DUE: JANUARY 9, 1986 ECF - 124 - 85 APPLICATION NO(s). SITE PLAN APPROVAL (SA-106-85) PROPONENT: ORTIITA PROPERTY ASSOCIATES, LIMITED PARTNERSHIP PROJECT TITLE: ROFTNG FIFTRONTCS COMPANY BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO All OW THE CONSTRUCTION OF TWO BUILDINGS TOTALING 153.300 SQUARE FEET OF OFFICE SPACE ON 10.48 ACRES OF PROPERTY_ LOCATION: LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF S.W. 39th STREET AT THE ROO RIOCK SITE AREA: 10.48 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross): 1'1,100 SQUARE FEET IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS MINOR MAJOR MORE IMPACT IMPACT INFORMATION 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services ✓ 16) Utilities COMMENTS: RECOMMENDATION: pems MITIGATED DNS n EIS REVIEWED BY: .., TITLE: Z47/..zry „Eil/cin/ 4-4-/A/6- DATE: / — 8 —F(de FORM #14 REVISED 9/10/85 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SI-L.- REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: CBL_Q G DATE CIRCULATED: JANUARY 2, 1986 COMMENTS DUE: JANUARY 9, 19R6 ECF - 124 - 85 APPLICATION NO(s). SITE PLAN APPROVAL (SA-106-85) PROPONENT: ORTIITA PROPFRTY ASSOCIATES, LIMITED PARTNERSHIP PROJECT TITLE: ROFTNG FLFTRONTCS COMPANY BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO AllOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF TWO BUILDINGS TOTALING 153, 100 SQUARE FEET OF OFFICE SPACE ON 10.48 ACRES OF PROPFRTY_ • LOCATION: LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF S.W. 39th STREET AT THE ROO RIOCK SITE AREA: 10.48 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross): 153,100 SQUARE FEET IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS MINOR MAJOR MORE IMPACT IMPACT INFORMATION 1) Earth /-' 2) Air /-- 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals ...----- 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities �� COMMENTS: AT D/ 6 1- 6 S �r��‘0 y cGS � / �� C /"ri e5 0?EC.... F4c—, i S RECOMMENDATION: V4r DNS Q MITIGATED DNS n EIS REVIEWED By:\\\ c- - f...---ie%&aft-t,---- TITLE: DATE: /— FORM #14 REVISED 9/10/85 S =. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SH__: REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: `7 ( K,C DATE CIRCULATED: JANUARY 2, 1986 COMMENTS DUE: JANUARY 9, 19R6 ECF - 124 - 85 APPLICATION NO(s). SITE PLAN APPROVAL (SA- 06-85) PROPONENT: ORTIITA PRfPFRTY ASSOCIATES, LIMITED PARTNERSHIP PROJECT TITLE: RUING FLFTRONTCS COMPANY BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO Al IOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF TWO BUILDINGS TOTALING 153.300 SQUARE FEET OF OFFICE SPACE ON 1O.4R ACRES OF PROPFRTY_ • LOCATION: LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF S.W. 39th STRFFT AT THE ROn RIOCI SITE AREA: 10.48 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross): 1'3,300 SQUARE FEET IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS MINOR MAJOR MORE IMPACT IMPACT INFORMATION 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services ✓ 16) Utilities COMMENTS: RECOMMENDATION: licDNS [] MITIGATED DNS [l EIS REVIEWED BY: ')// TITLE: DATE: —./4c � /7f5 ! FORM #14 REVISED 9/10/85 7 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHL_ REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: C� C. DATE CIRCULATED: JANUARY 2, 1986 COMMENTS DUE: JANUARY 9, 19R6 ECF - 124 - 85 APPLICATION NO(s). SITE PLAN APPROVAL (SA-106-85) PROPONENT: ORTIITA PR(1PFRTY ASSOCIATES, LIMITED PARTNERSHIP PROJECT TITLE: RIIFTNG FIFTRONTCS COMPANY BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO AIIOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF TWO BUILDINGS TOTALING 153,300 SQUARE FEET OF OFFICF SPACF ON 10.4R ACRES OF PROPFRTY_ LOCATION: LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF S.W. 39th STREET AT THE RflO RIf1CK_ SITE AREA: 10.48 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross): 15'1,100 SQUARE FEET IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS MINOR MAJOR MORE IMPACT IMPACT INFORMATION 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: 45,Z RECOMMENDATION: [l DNS 151 MITIGATED DNS 0 EIS REVIEWED B`. Ce .✓I TITLE: DAT E: / 8-6-- FORM #f:14 REVISED 9/10/85 ., A. -ziV' • • • :,;, is• !'. (. _ • 'F, ENVIRONMENTAL'CHECKLIST REVIEW'SHEt.i,:i mot'.` (. • • '''-' i' •fJ�' •AY-, J of t h r,�,tl` - REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: ... -.' DATE' CIRCULATED JANUARY 2, 1986 C• ,4 , - ' .;. .. A YOMMENTS''=;DUE::,''!'``''JANIIAR.Y "9; 1r9R6 *_` =• ECF.- 124 - 85 • ',i APPLICATION NO(s). SITE PLAN APPROVAL (SA-106-$5)' . PROPONENT: ORII I TA PROPFRTY S T $ ,,.. A HO•C. ATES, LIMITED PARTNERSHIP PROJECT TITLE: ROFTNA Fl FTi �- `'' =RfINTl'.S COMPANY , '�°'.'' - BRIEF DESCRIPTION--"OF;.PROJECT.:'•.''APPLICATION. FOR SITE PLAN'-APPROVAI TO Al I OW. . ' CONSTRUCTION., OF ,TWO .BUILDINGS TOTALING :153.100.,SQUARE SPACE . FEET OF.' OFFICE ON 1OF PR h,: '' '&" y ._ O.4R ACPFS (]PFRTY_ ,• "". LOCATION LOCATED ON THE NORTHSIDE :OF'"S..W. "39t `' Y h"'STREET.-AT�-TNF�'RM'RI-(lCK_ ,. ,. "•• '' ,,i'•, -;;;•',is' ,r; . ' '' :r. ;r'j „ , ,r, • 7 SITE,AREA: 10.48 ACRES . � , . .• , BUILDING' AREA`'`(gross) SQUARE FEET IMPACT • f` • y,• REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL:,ELEMENTS,: °4;: 'MINOR ;MAJOR MORE " ' ' ` IMPACT. . • IMPACT • INFORMATION,. ' • ', ;fix ,:. •' 1) Earth w': ,.�,'f` '''{wr ,y; y; e':',�" ;; ' y., ',,' F , 2) ; Air '. .' ;, 3) . Water . . 4) , ' Plants • 4.,• ,�::' „_ :: _. 5) Animals ✓::: r6) Energy an•d'Natural;• Resource's :'' • ' °' Environmental!' :{:, k. . ::. 7)•; :Environment . ..._ :✓.'.: . .,_ ,.8):, ,, Land and.,Shoreline, Use . .. ' Housing - . , 1.• - '10) ,;•"Aesthetics r' _ ' • 11) .Light 'ands,,Glare .,. • '; 12) -. Recreation '.,. r13). Historic and Cultural Preservation ,µ a ' J ;: ,•, _ .14), • Transportation ; . •. a , , ,., , , .-,,'.' ': ',x., f "' ',��;I,,r .�;. .•',,.. -tj. , " t' �,: , ',r ).A, , Public•Services. . ' , 16). Utilities . �..:. COMMENTS: ,;r. .b..- x ! 1r ..'r' : � ` '1Gii'•ry, 't. ',d tl` '• • • • ' r.` ,'; _ . _ it ; - RECOMMENDATION • , DNS MITIGATED DNS. T-' [� EIS. REVIEWED BY: ,I • t'2 _" . • . TITLE: DATE: 1 7 is ., ',. . „ !FORM 11L4 .",' . .[ i . . , REVIS,ED.,9/,10/85 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SF{ REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: e S DATE CIRCULATED: JANUARY 2, 1986 COMMENTS DUE: JANUARY 9, 198E ECF - 124 - 85 APPLICATION NO(s). SITE PLAN APPROVAL (SA-106-85) PROPONENT: ORTIITA PROPFRTY 1ccOCTATES, LIMITED PARTNERSHIP PROJECT TITLE: RQFTNG EIFTRONTCS COMPANY BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO AIIOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF TWO BUILDINGS TOTALING 153. 300 SQUARE FEET OF OFFICE SPACE ON 10.4R ACRFS OF PROPFRTY_ • LOCATION: LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF S.W. 39th STREET AT THE Rnn RinCK_ SITE AREA: 10.48 ACRFS BUILDING AREA (gross): 153,300 SQUARE FEET IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS MINOR MAJOR MORE IMPACT IMPACT INFORMATION 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: f� i-ejbte RECOMMENDATION: (/,!j,,'!( DNS MITIGATED DNS n EIS REVIEWED BY: aqia\p. TITLE:.: 12ài'K`` +me& I 1•�eQI DATE: V(IIY \od\ (Di t ' 35 FORM #�14 I REVISED 9/10/85 �1*� U :1'11 1 OF 1�11 `I ,11� 1� FILE NO(S): _ & i-U U r> . ♦ l's ♦ L JILDING & ZONING DEPARTh1cNT i ___. l'ic YrTh ..0 ASTER APPLICATI N NOTE TO APPLICANT: Since this is a comprehensive application form, only those items related to your specific type of application(s) are to be completed. (Please print or type. Attach additional sheets if necessary.) APPLICANT I TYPE OF APPLICATION NAME • Orillia Property Associates, Limited Partner- FEES Ship REZONE*(FROM TO ) ADDRESS 201 Elliott Ave. W. I^d SPECIAL PERMIT* CITY ZIP 1 TEMPORARY PERMIT* Seattle, WA 98119 '^J CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT'* F..1 SITE PLAN APPROVAL a65 VSL TELEPHONE 281-8700 0 SPECIAL PERMIT FOR GRADE AND FILL No. of Cubic Yards: CONTACT PERSON f--1 VARIANCE* From Section: * Justification Required dIEW Properties, Inc. . • Edward Heavey ° ADDRESS SUBDIVISIONS: 201 Elliott Ave. W. SHORT PLAT CITY ZIP Seattle, WA 98119 TENTATIVE PLAT TELEPHONE PRELIMINARY PLAT Q FINAL PLAT 281-8700 C WAIVER ' (Justification Required) OWNER NO. OF LOTS: NAME PLAT NAME: Orillia Property Associates, Limited Part- nership ADDRESS PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: 201 Elliott Ave. W. 1:::1 PRELIMINARY CITY ZIP FINAL Seattle, WA 98119 TELEPHONE �- y P.U.D. NAME: 281-8700 I I Residential 1-1Industrial ElCommercial n Mixed LOCATION .. MOBILE HOME PARKS: PROPERTY ADDRESS , Lind & 39th El TENTATIVE ` b�© aoGki OF S U), `c)1� -1 PRELIMINARY EXISTING USE PRESENT ZONING Vacant MP FINAL PROPOSED USE PARK NAME: 2 - Two Story Office Buildings NUMBER OF SPACES: • ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE 51q SQ. FT. ACRES AREA: 153,000 S.F. 10.48 I TOTAL FEES 757d. erry oc, ENTOPvsTAFF USE ONLY -- ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESSING DATE 1 js I c--11 1V 1. APPLICATION RECEIVED BY: Ns4.._)(e-AAdj • 11 � APPLIC TION DETERMINED TO BED — " '� ` 3 1985 DEC 0 ;......., Accepted CI Incomplete Notification Sent On By: BUILDING/ZONING DEPT,, (Initials) DATE ROUTED ADDITIONAL MATERIAL RECEIVED BY: APPLICATION DETERMINED TO BE: 1 2+ 61D 0 Accepted Incomplete Notification Sent On By: (Initials) ROUTED TO: Building Egg Design Eng. [4 Fire Parks EZI Police Policy Dev. CS Traffic Eng. m Utilities • REVISED 1-31-89 , / i . . . . ,-.... Legal description of property (If more space Is required, attach a separate sheet). Lots 3 & 7, L3.I.ocic 5 L3url.ingLon North Industrial Park, Renton II • • • • • • AFFIDAVIT • I, Edward Ileavey • , being' duly sworn, declare that I am Inc authorized representative to act for the properly owner, =Jownereof=the=property:Involy-ed=== In this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the Information herewith submitted are In all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS • 3b74-• DAY OF befi_e_y-n-6.-e."0r 19( 5. . • NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, RESIDING AT Orillia Property Associates, /5}...,41,e_A-) �v eUun, Limited Partnership aaJLtiL,() ,;(,,, , 13 • (Name of Notary Public) Carol A. Zipp (Signature of.aaraer- ,,7/ ��? � a),e9 G/� 06. 201 Elliott Avenue W. /CJ (Address) ' (Address) Seat Lie, WA 98119 (C1.ty) (Stale) (Zip) 281-8700 • (Telephone) Acceptance of this application and required filing fee does not constitute a complete application. Plans and other materials required to constitute a complete application are listed In the "Application Procedure." • • OF ?4 . 4A. j, ECF: ✓Gr%- 1�4'-g51 `' milk. 0 City of Renton . LU: [ A- loeis o A ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST 0 ?11 .D SEPSE��P Purpose of Checklist: The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43,21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for allproposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. Instructions for Applicants: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the ,environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know. the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply." Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impacts. Use of Checklist for Nonproject Proposals: (Please Type or Print Legibly) Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D). For nonproject actions (actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs), the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Boeing Electronics Company 2. Name of applicant: Orillia Property Associates, Limited Partnership 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact•person: Edward Heavey 201 Elliott Ave. W. Seattle, WA 98119 • 4. Date checklist prepared: 12/30/85 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Renton Planning 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Phase I - Building "11" May 1986 occupancy tit)/ ° =ii� ww, Phase II - Buildings 12 & C Fall 1987 { iti 1 , faN EJ 1 11 f DEc 3o 1985 BUILDING/ZONING DENT, 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansions, or further activity related • to or connected with this proposal? if yes, explain. No 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. None - 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. No 10. List any governmental approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. Site Plan Approval, Building Permit, Utility Connections. 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. -two story office buildings totaling 153,300 Sq. Ft. building features are smooth painted concrete walls with gray tinted grass. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topography map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. The site is located on SW 39th Street. • B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. EARTH a. General description of the site (circle one); flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other Flat b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? c. IRf iat general ti o°Js of soils are found on the site (for example, caly, sand, gravel, peat, ;k)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. Sand & Organic Material • d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. No — 2 — e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. Footing and structural fill, possible fill at driveways. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. No g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? 82 0 • h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: Install filter fabric, ditches and rocked layad entrances. ' 2. AIR • a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and • when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Dust and vehicle emissions during construction. Vehicle emission during regular use. b. Are there any off-site sources of emission? No c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: During construction, use of good operational techniques such as watering of exposed areas and regular street cleaning. Efficient layout of parking, driveways to reduce traffic congestion; therefore, 3. WATER less idle tine and lower car emissions. a. Surface: • 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. Springbrook creek (Drainage Channel) • • 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. No 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. None - 3 - 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximately quantities if known. Contruction of new storm drainage system that will collect run- off and detaining it prior to discharge to storm drain system located along Lind Avenue. 5) Does thr proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. No 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No b. Grourk 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and appaoximately quantities if known. No 2) Descrne waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industr--.al, containing the following chemicals . . .; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. None c. Water Runoff (including storm water): I) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. See 4 on page 4 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. No, possibility exists though if any of sewer pipes break. - 4 - IF/ • d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: Storm drainage system including catch basins, underground pipes. 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: Ja deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other o evergreen tree: iir,cedar, pine, other Eg Shrubs o grass o crop or grain o Wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bulirush, skunk cabbage, other o water plants: water lily, eel grass, milfoil, other o other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Addition of new landscaping, removal of existing ground cover. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: See landscape Plan L-1 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: Birds: Hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other Crows , Sparrows , Robins , Finches Mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other Fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. . No • - 5 - // d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: Landscaping of the site (2% for wildlife as required by code. 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Electricity of/and natural gas for heating. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: Insulation of roof, walls and slab as required by energy code. 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? •If so, describe. No 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. Tenant will provide emergency services as required. • 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: See 1 • b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? Traffic along Lind Avenue. — 6 — 2) What types and levals of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Noise during construction , traffic noise between 6:30 am and 5:30pm. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: Use of quiet equipment. 8. Land and Shoreline Use • a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Site is undeveloped. The site to the north is vacant, to the east is proposed development, to.the south is SW .39th street and to the west is Spring Brook Creek (drainage channel). b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. No c. Describe any structures on the site. None • d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? No e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? MP f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Connurcial g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? None • h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. No i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? 1100-1300 Employees j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: None - 7 - 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: Buildings are designed to accomodate primarily office use. 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. None b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: None 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed. Buildings are constructed of smooth painted concrete walls and gray tinted glass. Tallest height of the building excluding HVAC b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed?is 28�-�� • None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: Heavily landscaped parking areas and around building elevations. 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? Parking and building lights at night. • • b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No • c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: Use of low glare fixtures. - 8 - • 12. Recreation a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? None b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: None 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. None b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: • None 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed • access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. Lind Avenue b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximately distance to the nearest transit stop? • Yes c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many • would the project eliminate? The project will provide 921 stalls and none will be eliminated. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or str 3, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). Possible signalization of 41st and Lind. • - 9 - • e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or 4, air transportation? If so, generally describe. Yes, rail abuting the north and west property f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. Estimated trips at peak hours are 7:34 AM •and 4 :34 PM. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: Staggering of shift hours, improve ride-share and transit utilization. 15. Public Services • a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. Yes, emergency only. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. None 16. Utilities a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. (look up of natural gas, storm sewer, sanitary sewer, water and telephone. C. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Proponent: �S-z •-t,e•-cd Name Printed: Edward Heavev • 1 - 10 - ,1. I.,,w \ dam,.i. P 3P0S E 1 ` • • s�• • • • a''r,.•t•t,. 9/25/85 ZONING \ `` y +../ n 1 • . �. r I• r �., �e. oyc tb... OM p -- aO y ifti ii.- 1 IS .. , - ..,\ , M E T R b \ 1 . --l..-.,.,..,I',,-,,,,,:,:a..,...,, ;,,,,w r �_ 1 -t . \----- - - ,��! �,, , ft 1. JII� i1 .117 ,lli f- , / a,-. - 7"-.4f• ..?-4„,,,,1,.,„ , ,, ••-••• „____--,.,.__F_ Y: ",,, "' , • ,...iik...e•-"-L: ..,-...- 1 1.,,Mtk• L ' '-e' - H ; : i" . .1, , .7 _,- -: " .' 1 '---\ . ,lit 1!i ' • a _ } ,l .• 1- i •- • •iirg 1 . 1� J I • d I ' � , — / L �� I • I1 V k ,t, cn,e. L . 1 i• .t 1 ii 1 ' 7- / • \ ' ' ..,`iX 11 ZONING CLASSIFICATIONS j . M-P Manufacturing P.rw _ - ... _- 'I 1 ,, [i r. 0-P Office Park !I , . I . , II , �! 4. I L-1 Light Industry C? � 1 I �' i `r.; 0 III -- — . ..-._ B-1 Business Tel.- _. '_- , • - P-1 Public Use `' • 1 R-1 Single Family , r_27; s ,i , LJ 1- _ , • II , R-1;J I :� �" I sl• • G-1 General 1 I v,�,„ - ,,.•4 1 re) , _ I ::, ,.._ _ . .,,L , . , .1 il , . , 1 , I • / ' '1 — .. . ., r1; © / Vie! • / ''' ' '--: . I p. I___ .. 0 I41'.., / . f I t1. : D [ ,,IPTri ' ? .: , j IL:: i.. — ji. __ __ : aq‘....;•1 • ___p„. .. -. DEC — 1 1 r — f_: nor 1 h . ` c I 1 I I 1 I �.� ' . I I 13lJILDlf1lG/ f1�1I11G C?�r, . , I • I '11—, s I '�. L. - ` `r.._.-.L_1 1 I. ..r •. 1 _ _ I 1 ., r ' /• r 1 1 L-- r J•.Ex• ••ltr ' —��J DIY' ... .._•.t.•y,•...«..,.,,...t.._ ,,,r.••.ur.i..r 1.. .rxr'1'it rJft la1i.. _tL r,. w W1M !M. Ll�. I. ,l , Tr 1 a�Jr I ks sip SERIc� -- -`y A;ti) }:- six. •'a=' 4'i,:y''�, .ty,: "td :'it` d .k, ,;:z { ,-'!,. a„ - 7 �S"'`1�t Rt, Y .N ,•fit*''r•.' .S r '41i• i. }; he .k"t{....'Y.IYV"r yy,,::.4`':k- ',�z�S' f.. "'�f . :4�r,Yi. '.iY.:�:1� A'�.�. '+��,} 'ter,",(; '+'n.' f€ ,'r'rlf'A,'.y .�Lu'r �,,�. t [ f4'• .>,.� -d � �. ,,f. I., ' ,,...i, !�fv"A, a !<^;. 'r 'e' a ,.r' '` t� ..("r.ri ,.�: �,j.:'a h, 1` '.+;: t',;i.ia-,dx r,4i.i•- %�t f.': .y i,V�' ti. 4"..+...f"':",L.:"a .a`ti t-iG.:Sl.r? �}`sr, �'.t" �}'.�•, €. ,,y', •1,.�., k�"=;,•�Y,rN�$. ,e,. tu, ::y h S �,:.1kVr t.'a,�.tdT�-1t,�1.' ,';a s 3r4a f �� t;c.'li,.'°ifjs '<-.>' 1. ";'2' ..,,iE' .:,5 ,s;i.41,t e',,:*;'.,:'a'a,- .� ',}r h.0".r', '".. 4 .y': J�-li ;)•,y ffeR i:. 'L -'-::"' t�',�4i�.• ,Jtd4a.,` 'at;� •:b,;so,�.v,,,( '• •r„•.�.p.; .ts„ .a,." >J r.. fix.,� p� r• ":1::.�3+`.• 5...,1',.-.�Gt a':f a� .,,- �6 i r 1, yY:°' + ,f'r'aiP',. 'r`r ui ,',V: - G 'Y ''-ti:2.'' 4s �.ti ,,y,<,1; rFyt '+ ""J„ _ . t a• `':�i:,,f;y. ,•:`r.:J..11 :iiet;o '"i.,: St ��f;r,,:�f';.35;:;.,F.k t:�!,r: .j, ,i�,�,,; tF4 Sp�yti�.t...r�,,'r, 3,�T.f,V"y-i,r€,rs� �S y��•Yr 'Cty.y ''1Lk y� ,.`. t, _ i'G a�.••r, .�4-,J t > h`� :gip', ur�tE 'tw?1'w'Ji5'1-,-3,`1 j,';,n.1 '1'-v'�; �'•�1 4"' „r {ds + 7, .q, :A.,4-:t w 1 . .i., 0.T I •? ,R 1 g° o;•• ea.y-gaug 41•gh uveigli h,�: A;• , `ri(i•.•':Y?�,u�i`�. "l,o,�t„, "4.'+)`..1r .;�.,f�:i1' nh, „tjy`..Y.1+. ':.� .b,�#:. att.k} d ,..r., .�:e a �� .`a^.y2sr•�fL':�.4S7.f n.e Y!. .}k •ri+r.vCIt, arr .1 '.o.d.;: :i.' ;1;i,G, fs; ,;hYi�;rf,$,,',;,k„}i:c6 ,:Kr�..{ 9, ,tP,' a,:',' ,0, { §w-� 'S .,1.,..s X -� ,,. �•��" -° lumil u'�i ho i 'd co'�ativ. a tihq�ear3sha-e�> 1,;�:: � ��:,' s ,, `Pik, :.r,r # it$ , r,,,,,';';�,. •it y=' 'w , ' g) Pc•. , �''-. p_,g r.,, .. {t„ } S+A..t}i't,, :lST. V ',r7,pi5w3.ta»,1 ,.wi <'�`.?�:,3't.}"%S, �f `R iV. SJy4� "F ,$' v, :,,,;.,,:..- vtzi:.3"4,tlt+lt,,tl tuu{ _ �(.�.t'.•{E t.,-S'.t +7; r�.)fs 5,",21., }:;i1'. .�r,,,�?Y.„ Ia., ;,'lfr"`ak^' i "t t',�f.i %y' L f •,.i t t e juit . w I tip,li,*rl'le's'f*:+9wQathp.2 ,•:-.'t�':f,;.:Mx� `, •ytti ti-!h,o4;4f,�.. '.�{L c f r� 'i, s,t,,,,aG 4"��;.; 3±h ��q�.' ,�,�.� ��`�,' R. ;� � ",a�,`�, _ eM,,Q,�Y V .,.`7.� J ..J', t ,P.1.��;`t. :Y•�',irr,.d r'+�`.,`:`y`�,g�,y, .r+��€`^:4.+ ', r ,'c'.i:'`r',•� f �!7 0{ .�•i e.x.,� S �� 1 �'� ,J.?3i•'4�� ' .,i• y.t,r,,,fty .,�, 'Y',.a'ayF:it;r- rt,'',rL.'iY:,3' sir f„��:J',9'F•'�'4j7' `'Srr'•'i r�t','t� ••a: �' " 'rt'+p; }'�''�` o `oI°r iss d r r;. �r V.'. i ,,?4,. 4�c,.t.; ,j"..fif. < 4 -4 , It� ', :;':ft. ,,,,,':, r% !'.:�f ' {'tat ,t? (ntQgCi''1, le',1 a-. rk.�brc nzE;'olyester''s.. r� , .,;,t. ^<Nh ki,w ri n��'- ,�,"k:�ii ,'r+t}�,y,g3e1 a�` `-a$n' '�i;�{. .V , - �'' -,f' r'.;,,$'�cd r�k �,�.�'�_..Lw:?ti.,t tit 3" s ,x�t".:{r�,.3* ..;�-r:t'�'�+};,, U r. i`wi, wawa ,� 5.�+` n .�• ' ' :vi,$+ i'.: {;r,,'. ,:k.; ,::".r.,,,:: .,,, ,k,t if: - .,,'_ � '_' -: F:4::,:..,r :,� . . fit. o f :I-Ava'lable-In+Qle .e,.:• ',tio�,t hde4% , ''ortco ors t k;,14 .:v.li°a+.Mz,e a, t'��''Irit `l+r b laJ': �'.n rn f jya: ,5. ,e4 c'; ,,lc9pr . rI l n, jY.,t . :rli.I r �'i::.'�3-[e'= I � .2,4,ii d6 'i•� "� ° `s y� 'r.. 4' •'i3 i �' ?tr, 'Ytr, .,, "µi- "fy. .+i.i1.,,'i"t,' ?,� .['.f: '14,'1 ' ,.i k, X`f //.n�� ,r i. ./ e'' `� =}>,."��.c�H.t:.i, .k. �t Y „ +, �f ''4t��.1F, ,?` ,jt`-+ _� ,�x4Y. ,,� ,. ��.4-'� �� 1�'> � A I�e TLa ed.�alu I �reflector;�'`r� ,,,,,,° F:1`a'{,,.' rl h, '+'•`� i; i�'. `�'t;:.j,rt �'4.LYjT r-,`,y+R , di, "tT1. a': ,�+n }.y�'7• ;�,"•�t .:=f ,Y •t t ;; Y, '' * > field a°JU .bIee p or orwar`;o'r'side;throw �xtrudeid� 3` l, ;e` }� � } r .• ``�' a M1a }` f t rs s' -e '�• ,?., r y r f M1 �t& ,r.v": %t.l,'• e'r. k f'`", 1 t # r4:.e-t.:.;.t.'.tiire.t, I v .�°. r f .,4; ;; j: ,>, ;alumi u k door6fr? r ie A, h;is aci rse Is�f;.ant 1-, ��.,x '- '' 'S '% �'t 0 0 g , o M .f` Cam, lu4 s `. `P' V:1::. s� Man: .,S t t _. - g' v; .9' , 1 , (1 9':,9..K f.},w"tt',f,02 4t1 4,,011kq'a. h, Io-..±`"f�+.5'," `t, 1 j' i° p©vier,f r;zE eco is I,.�k;" ai * St` d ',fit£= it : ``M ., 0 r°o e I is° (sited f omooptical chatnbe rt t , , 0.ti x 'Ta, F e r 9", 'i1'` '''r,,,%!..,,k:h.4' u•tF'_ `•" �� x .a1't w4 tiJ�'i5 I`k .` cj -.1 p ° id° boon ro lon°er?ba)I (if` s k ,r w =t.4; , 3 3 i,V'-' ' f" t"a 2, r v' ' 4,, T. t k ,' T I. y, O Lx r crI6-1u,. f P; air ,:fo(,,r P rt°Y .- ,iv t , i S a „pLI air 4 $$: z ,2'4}' � �,a • 4 °° - l l 'ap ard,;mas 'a mount $,,x,,,:. E. �y+: "fi` Ff a rt M u Xr y , '° ,fi '� ° poweroorl� ou gso:fe'r sfi 1444 r',I,};�:dt`n',�;r:t, ., ;'s tit;-. a u e 4 s,c ,:'r2L•=3�y;� �I° +"• x% ".'•.i $ f;�; �, '« � Yn.', ,„� y Ln,t. , �'i e.eel;;e te,o. s n. S + QSItIYe. t+ r ':>,1g..'`•„; r;a,1 �a�'+:7'cyf�:l''$A $4'x'�* t+r:>s•'.i�if','.t'�''ty.lt'6 .Pi",. 'i<•a .?. a: ' 4, #'r ':IocI[ a d se' of o' ©a , r` ., ,.- •t. F ,,. ;1 ,• �, ,t ., �. 4 _-s,f t :r�,:a; r « t.g. o , S eeds.re 1 , $ ay S Jir"F Ys t"i��'�3�$} •.A1 r '1,� a 't S;."t-e+Q� .},it r .. '�,r';S �,� '>x.`na�t: '.4i.s' i! :v{'arl ,.y{{��'g ', �4 t �P r '> �9i^I.i t1 �` .>.{ «►« ,J��i:146r:v' ,�3'U)e .,��.�r'rra�fC2F'+,a' y°4;y�Sr�4 ?r 7r'°;i.3,>1,;,:+�,�S 4�..�w e,�' �'' ,repo l o ,. -t� y� "fit..' 4 ag ��' r f{'�a{'S s•� �g�, �,r,.t.ptG� `+}�'` y rf 17i'.,..a, ,, '^' , s if S ff t. -• 4.. =4''''3 ;4[r ,py :' .1« '$"�' '!'"• '.1?:ti'' i'"f.A. ..{Litt Zt '.�(`3� '6 1+ 1 a,:,,:y'";°'ik:', "f .f..S, s., a i ti ° 1 >4., i s i' `.,,ff ;i 1 rr '4t f`' 4 "'` `r,r& ,' 4» .r r y." r,y ^< ' .w: �‹��' ,ff,,3� ,:i.��;�J��,:.3.,:r .•tg�,=p ° � �...�� t ,..� '} ,�;- �`��-�i.��uit: ° e�o wet�locafio �}„�� i�a-',.e;,'y„ '�11(,rtAa 'k:0,;-Spl fi t f titi''•_-,it?�:;t, •; •'''••?''-, if' :, { .f •,:,t ,•F #7 :9 et `"-'v , '; ,✓ `5 kjrU', •3 l' !� .t fir)'+`,M 'k ., - t i k 3n rn ; g ; ;�: •qAP : n`N Q door,;itr in 4 , o bjketba�I 5,� r � :=,1 Housing EPA+ k CO 3"°-rki• g P=a d ivew ' ;' f aye, wa!s,malls 250W(HPS)& + �eai'fo I.© t or are eKNIRhzrr st 0eill + �r t 400W(all sources) 2.3 ft. .22 m2el, ° '0 z� t'he I ,,- ., lg�'tfc° r°lied; x, .r e". - . 1 1000W(all sources) 3.0 ft.zf.28 m2 �rI" w. « ' ', �'. alas. 'a, ,- s 'tea L .y t , 7t,', , �I'. •,, d>t s;,�."l,x`h,•yf•r+;y`lyr'it'r;:R{'':d r'.;,;w" ::,it.,fit w,;,�1..s;�E7`'hq'N•4"�S.es .: +f ' 4 + t ""' ;K r5'�• .s :''r `';fiAbove,EPAs incl de mounting;arid,.P f,,, x,F 1 F .r x- +,° , •:�;" Vs, u ,"a�. +L,`ti6"ft V+z'•t+(t•i� `ia�. z t1",tt', °` ;p`k 4 w 'e ' :il"5 $ S', r A. {. '-tiniPTr.E or Nift ledu,tt-r'ft s.06'�p1�',N,i(atiove"�alue:-; :,��f t• : ," A ' j i' �� „Tt ' }t aw iw''•'''a kii'''?,'''.'' ittreff .'r:,y'•P,}s'fio{{ata ifLrt.G=u.}, Fn'i,r'..,, ,- [r ., •' K 1.'Te 4a -iV.'a r $�''M1+fG.'F'i' r. '•g o.} -,,A?,y 9P x .'14,. L."-"ligi,,.l d'Y i„54!" � ..5 3` , ' 4 r r' e t(a ,. .5 r r "t �+� ! a rt p p"tt tti V �y ,Y" k` s r T.f 'r2•in nr c"fir -L a ,T 1f'"r.''•�4 ,. f a�t�".,t ar , t, x y t S +,r ,tky',4, L 5 �+ 7F ? h a•,• { Y J'� fT:;' f1l F..,"F��tY'{f.` J {' h $e.lP a 4k y� �� . 1 �' N t q; 1 ) -a 7'4ygrf i '"'((q5•,. :,643c,1 jd °T'ts'r Geg.' • S rlsay ,ytr.44.-: ,,,,,,t),` t,,; _ ,f ,. Y_ r .�, n} t a4 , ,p, ♦., to trt � .TAr jt , FIXTURE SELECTOR GUIDE: The table below is a quick mounting height. Then, read down the columns for reference approximator for fixture comparison and selection. comparison of initial average footcandle levels to wattage, To use the table, select the appropriate area width and source and spacing° ri�rnrOV° RANI1 •,,'-. AREA COVERAGE CHAR [ . 0 V/ f __ .'.MOUNTING' AREA ' LONGITUDINAL''^ . V IjAGE HEIGHT• .,WIDTH ,;(polesep,)•,; ,'.. felNI`,fAL SOURCE/WATTAGE • I%),:t;,;'-a.,,,.. (ft•);.%,,, ,�:,;.,.SPACINGr,'itu t:._i;:F9G74,,r11NDLE AtN 06 1986 High 250+,' 20' 40' 55' 4,35 Pressure 400 30' 60' 9o' 3.60 Sodium ' 40' 80' 120' 5..6511. ..i l •_, ,_ Metal 400 30' 60' 90' 3.00 'Halide -,1000 • 40' 80' 120' 4.40 • Mercury 400 30' 54' 90' 1.60 . Vapor,,,,;,,,,,,,, ;'.-1000,,;, 40' 72' 104' 2.40 4 ,Based on 30,000 lumen lamp.For standard lamp,multiply illumination levels by.94 NOTE:This table is intended for approximation purposes and not to replace a precise lighting survey. 58 l� felc 1 ,4. �+ •...,- OUTDOOR LIGHTING ` • ,,- SHARP CUTOFF : ' • TAS SERIES • fi ,) L t' - .fir, .` qti 'p 1 ; r•1 y Rt 1A .41 `"�Zp4t I .',t-'h _', ,'.+:i't_..,,,,...,-..„-A„• ' I._:� =I:t;.•.1 __14._�.« , A 1r) .,�.s,�: 1 •1 • ra• t,'- -- s'-,i �.,v,:: 4k fi,_�.'i ' .,,'.c%r. : ' •di•:.:. .•s:;. a: ,.;:, ,,,. _ � :• , .a�• ;_� -v,, Dimensions, t, j'i:� kj:: ,'r,� .Jt, :;k 1-,`.o,. �:I' i�t' a�"�: 1 p •,,` '-'A nCatalo Numbee,ARki Volta a Ballast'; a Weight `•?>.LLength,�':,;�; - Width Depth .r': Z -. ,,.''..4.,,'f't .�tA-ti, gr •a .,C,fi d',,>." g. g ,,•n;.r:i ,.;�I;, ;•:, I',,; e.y,1. ,;,. ,, «. u';'IF-,"+,rr».:';':\A', ,z f e'. '.Lbs.-K` .'in.-cm: .Ind:;-cm.:. `In.-cm: f • Br:Wattage=; . , " : .,a :_, ._ I• ._.,. u..,:: .� ..�specl,.Y)''b:,Np , , , J: . High ,.t,, `:`.,_,`,.•;.-,,...,: ,-.- - :,_.,V.-,v, ,,a" 250 rTA5:250;SSP1.2':`�::;;.;x;,=:�';�::',=:;j• . Auto. 24-10.91 24-60.96 19�/z-49.53 9�/z-24.13 Pressure t:;�''�,•:....;1 ':-, 400 ETAS'400$SP�12" "•� .� , .,120''' :. Reg. 39-.17.73 24-60.96 19�/z-49.53 9�/z-24.13 Sodium "`,--``' `_2 - "k. 53-24.09 30-76.20 231/8-58.74 101/z-26.67 1000 ETAS,1Od0;S,SP12°,,.?:� `;; -.208�', ` . Metal 400 'AS.',400;M,SP•12 a-.; �f,f ',.,1 a Peak 31-14.09 24-60.96 191/z-49.53 91/z-24.13 Halide 1000 VITAS 1000;M`SP12 < ; T ti Lead 47-21.36 30-76.20 231/e-58.74 101/z-26.67 • L' 801 Mercury ;} , u ;f, `400 ITAS':400H'SP,12'''' f't^s `'' ';tt CWA 30-13.64 24-60.96 191/z-49.53 91/z-24.13 .!,fie>, 1000 'TAS1'000?HSP12'a;,,0,-1-.,;',', i ;,';'; 45-20.45 30-76.20 231/8-58,74 101/z-26,67 1.,,. ..t,t 04,,IAw.J.tlh-yt4-11 _ I r I E.'. ''�I .. .I.tT rc . ,�5, w-n.' t t I,a Y t�' r # r•'f 1._I'., _•i4l=d,t:vrjt..I .,,:cL Ini_ii Jl,.'+k(4,i.4 it t.Ji f,..ec'.t Ut4!i It� , �.[D.' * 1 , , F 1 \ t•IA.J�-u }a r.a. 1 14).fir)itu iclik.,4 11.tr i il1 17fid"°.t f). .hp - e t-l r `' it. 5 j' t , « :t,, ''i i „ _ .•!..••1 111t1r,Ltr)1,1]I_.laT!., ,,,t�{ I'I to li,lb J e tr�y�'��I °u-�l+,l�e��en -O��n�yto Ii, giif ''yy{, , 1: Ltf .,. 4 ? , .' r...J,_'+ 't':IM1I r I't."Yt,.l,lif\iwi:i11'... 1711[ 7�iJ-,,:�w:11••xl%P)1 $ _l.ry t 'J h `i' _ .. ,I 1Nli-"I:-,±,IV;it. ,;{.: !Cfr,1.[,.'I':,•l4. t� } f 1 1 f '. '• a�.1:,1 tU'Lr , . #' • ,. ' ' • Pe • s t.rr tr: y h i , ' t 'i;Y, '!f ' t, t yJ/,,, • i'M'r}4 S�y',K'' 11 f. t.•t • ' , 'i t.,,, Ar .4. .+t1 r.:1 ri { yt fy N. i r<tt . L y •rt•t t�pfti f g•'� ' ,, 'a. t FJ'wyY�R f, ` .. Z 321 ; • ��r we +,hir T '.' • " ti "t '' • i y ''�! .I:' 6' , S fr •a• + Pt, ;e 5r'",S` •q,r$11,•'4,P44a4,"5q'1-4 ' 4,t r `, ' 5.. .,« .3:xrr, '+, 't''.�. 4e #I ' °.Si �I.star.. P:'' y t •.�..,. _1-4'd't-- . 'r! `A f, •p ti' l.441,Iili,L.,.. .d.•to,.,•rv, 4,1,..(='it3.},,,•,....t r .,.I.s4r.. ,_ • • OPTIONS • rsurFfX"_„.t„:*- .yxa"`'',..*,a;°,w:, e1`v..r es",.;7,?t-' ,.: y:•''r:"'r.i !CAT:NO.r `'::,DESCRIPTION;' %^ 'l WITH: . ',tt'.: '=PER/PE;.'p 'NEMATwist-Lock PE Receptacle •. iW !I(,,,,-,',:',, - ''.? &Photocontrol for 120,208,240V 7 PERIPE4 1 NEMATwist-Lock PE Receptacle 4 • • _ &Photocontrolfor480V • 1 y .`='•PERIPE7 1 NEMATwist-Lock PE Receptacle • ` s; &Photocontrol for 277V • {='PER;;.;t.; NEMA Twist-Lock PE Receptacle only. • I : '2,,''4 No Photocontrol • /'-TB.f. :;',:;1lj Multi-Tap Ballast(120,208,240,277V) • I',-DC:''r .•= Decorator Color Specify(See Inside Back Cover) , • s-MA',::,:-, Mast Arm Adaptor* F=DA12P,•• Degree Arm for Pole` •. • '•'=DA12W, Degree Arm for Wall° . 3 "To order replace SP12 designation in the catalog number with the ! • desired optional mounting designation. ' • NOTE:For more details,see outdoor option pages. • 1 .. • • 1bi1tie)(G o, 59 . LENDING OF FILE Fig TITLE