Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLUA86-008 . . • ' ----- , Pk__if 4 4 rfrr ' 4 NIr 4 . ilia da.11 _i .. .1 4 ). re, Nig* .:..... 1'67. . • ki' 1 I 1 1 .e. ... 4 ,... I *el' 4 • .-.) t . .. i t ' . Ili ,. . . 4 • ' , .. th. 2) ... , .. - 2 . i ., i lik li iii. p • _,.... i 1 A . . . ,_ .., . , . .. 4b I. • . . i 1 .. I 'Ili 4 AIN '• *tt. 7"fti-sl. • . . k.. i,. . 4P4° Ifi 4.r iiit , • . ,42A 1 ry 4 . . i ; ii 4 . . -: ,, . 1 ' j . ;•,. ..: ...., ..41.‘ ..). ' 1. . . .. / 7.:• ...„ r' I i 1 Pt 1. 1 ..-- t tam n't iimo.`. ' . 0 • & v ri,,, • . l . .ftr 4 'i A 1 40 • . I 1. 'T i - " ler • I ' :: • I. '••/ BEGINNING OF FILE FILE TITLE / 15s Sig -0- 108 ; MICROFILMED • NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING • • AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION RENTON HEARING EXAMINER RENTON, WASHINGTON A Public Hearing will be held by the Renton Hearing Examiner at his regular .Audrey DeJoie , being first duly sworn on oath states that meeting In the Council Chambers on the Second Floor of City Hall, Renton, he/she is the Chief Clerk of the Washington on March 25, 1986, at 9:00 A.M. to consider the following petitions: JOHN S.WILSON(NATIONAL PRIDE VALLEY NEWSPAPERS CAR WASH) Application for site plan approval to build a self-service car wash, file SA- Daily News Journal, Daily Record Chronicle, Daily Globe News 008-86;property located between N.E. Third Street and N.E. Fourth Street - Daily newspapers published six(6) times a week.That said newspapers near Jefferson Avenue N.E. are legal newspapers and are now and have been for more than six months prior to the date of publication referred to,printed and published Legal descriptions of the files noted in the English language continuallyas dailynewspapers in Kent Kingabove are po file in the Renton Building and g Zoning Department. County, Washington. Valley Newspapers have been approved as legal All interested persons to said petitions newspapers by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for are invited to be present at the Public Hearing on March 25,1986,at 9:00 a.m.to King County. express their opinions. Published in the Daily Record Chronicle March 17, 1986. R1442. The notice in the exact form attached, was published in the Daily News Journal , Daily Record Chronicle X, Daily Globe News , (and not in supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers during the below stated period. The annexed notice a Notice of Public Hearing was published on March 17, 1986 R1442 The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of$ 17.82 Subscribed and sworn to before me this 20 t h day of Mar c h 192. Not Public for the State of Washington, residing at Federal Way, King County, Washington. VN#87 Revised 10/84 A. July 21, 1986 Renton City Council Minutes Paae 6 Based on the project scope, its long term impacts, and need for additional time to review issues, Council recommended that the WSDOT be asked to postpone its public hearing on 7/24/86, reschedule the hearing for mid- September, and extend the comment period for 30 days after the hearing. In addition, staff was requested to prepare a detailed analysis of the DEIS responding to the following Council concerns: 1) Impact of weaving action between inside and outside HOV lanes north of the Sunset interchange; 2) Mitigation measures to protect residents against construction noise and lights, particularly at night; 3) design of access roads to Renton hill to ensure safety when icy; 4) possibility of rebate to Renton Hill residents who contributed to street LID; 5) guarantee that access, pedestrian and vehicular, will be provided at all times and emergency access roads will not be used for non-emergency traffic; and 6) notification of any plans for ramp metering, which Council opposes. Council President'Mathews advised receipt of confirmation from WSDOT that the hearing on 7/24/86, has been postponed and indicating the hearing will be rescheduled after the City Council has had sufficient time • to thoroughly review the draft EIS. MOVED BY MATHEWS, SECONDED BY KEOLKER, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE REPORT. Upon inquiry, Mr. Parness • advised that the suggestion for use of I-405 HOV lanes by general traffic has also been included in report to WSDOT. MOTION CARRIED. Planning and Planning and Development Committee Chairman Keolker presented a Development report regarding the H.A.S. Short Plat Appeal, File No. Sh. Pl. 029-86, Committee three-lot subdivision located at 134 Rainier Avenue South, which was H.A.S. Short Plat ' denied by the Hearing Examiner. The Committee recommended that the Appeal, Hearing Examiner's decision be upheld since there is little evidence that File No. Sh. Pl. the buildings on the site meet the definition of a shopping center, parking 029-86 space on site is inadequate, and subdivision would create irregularly shaped lots, which, in turn, would hinder redevelopment and require use of cross-easements for parking and access. MOVED BY KEOLKER, SECONDED BY REED, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. National Pride Car Planning and Development Committee Chairman Keolker presented a Wash Site report regarding the National Pride Car Wash site'approval appeal, File Approval Appeal No. SA-008-86, self-service facility between NE 3rd Street and NE 4th File No. ' Street, near Jefferson Avenue NE. The'Committee recommended remand SA-008-86 of this application to the Hearing Examiner to be reviewed concurrently with application to develop property to the east of the subject site for a gas station and a 24-hour mini-mart. The Committee recommended the following conditions attached to the remand: 1) owners of the four single - family residences facing these two parcels be notified of future hearings; 2) site,plan be reviewed under criteria of new Site Plan Ordinance, as agreed to by applicant; 3) site plan receive unlimited review by Hearing Examiner, not just items appealed; 4) Site Plan criteria should be reviewed with intent to minimize conflicts between two separate parcels and integrate improvements including curb cuts, directional lighting, landscaping, etc. MOVED BY KEOLKER, SECONDED BY REED, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Utilities Utilities Committee Chairman Clymer presented a report concurring in Committee the recommendation of the Public Works Department to accept the low Bid Award for bid of Samish Construction Company, Inc..in the amount of $60,794.10 Renton Hill Alley for the Renton Hill Alley Sewer Replacement and South 5th Street Paving Sewer/S. 5th and Storm Drainage Project. The Committee also recommended that the Paving & Storm Mayor and City Clerk be authorized to execute the contract documents. Drainage MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY REED, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. Mayor Shinpoch agreed to check on a consideration raised by Councilman Reed regarding expense of a project which will be eliminated by the I-405 "S" curve project. MOTION CARRIED. { PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE REPORT July 16 , 1986 TO: Renton City Council FROM: Planning and Development Committee RE: National Pride Car Wash Appeal National Pride has appealed several conditions attached to a site plan approval. At the time the site plan was presented to the Hearing Examiner the adjacent parcel to the east was being considered for a site plan. The property is located between N.E. 3rd and N.E. 4th and is a triangular piece of property. A site plan has now been accepted for review for the eastern parcel for a gas station and an AM-PM mini mart. The property to the north is single family residence. The property to the west is multifamily and an adjoining undeveloped small parcel is L-1 and B-1 zoning. The two parcels in question are B-1 zoned. The applicant requests a remand to the Hearing Examiner to have the two parcels reviewed for site plan approval at the same time . The Committee recommends the Council remand the parcels with the following requests: 1 . The owners of the single family residences facing these two parcels be notified of future hearings. The Committee was informed that there are only four such residences. 2 . The site plan be reviewed under the criteria of the new Site Plan Ordinance. The applicant has agreed to this condition. 3 . The Site Plan will be fully reviewed and the Examiner' s review is not limited to items appealed by the applicant. 4 . The Examiner should review the two parcels with the new Site Plan criteria to minimize the conflicts created by two separate site plans and to further the inter- relationship of the two parcels in such areas as curb cuts, integrated and directional lighting, landscaping, etc. 61701(-- . 11(tWe-Irr)//,4-149-44-c-i- -4A)- • OF R�� o THE CITY OF RENTON • `$- Z MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 • o BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR • MAXINE E.MOTOR, 9,0 `o. CITY CLERK • (206) 235-2501 0,9gT6 0 SEP1,140 July 24, 1986 Mr. Frank J. Granger • P.O. Box 816 Redmond, Washington 98073-0816 Mr. John S. Wilson National Pride Car Wash 14124 - 177th N.E. Redmond, Washington 98052 Re: SA-008-86 Site Plan Approval - National Pride Car Wash Appeal Dear Sirs: The Renton City Council at its regular meeting of July 21, 1986 adopted the attached Planning and Development Committee report dated July 16,, 1986, remanding the two parcels to the Hearing Examiner for simultaneous site plan review with conditional requests. Please contact the Hearing Examiner's Office at phone 235-2593 for scheduling information. Yours truly, CITY OF RENTON ?7A01--t Maxine E. Motor, CMC City Clerk cc: Council President Hearing Examiner is June 23. 1986 •-- Renton City Council Minutes =` Page 3 Councilman Clymer reiterated his position that single family homeowners, particularly those with small houses on large lots, should not be charged the same utility.rate as more intensive users since runoff generated from those lots is minimal in comparison. Referencing earlier requests from developers of office parks to receive credit for installing storm drainage facilities, Councilman Reed doubted that purchasers of homes in a single family plat would receive credit for improvements installed by the developer. Council President Mathews suggested that the Council retreat on June 30 would be an opportune time to continue discussion of this matter. Councilmen Trimm and Hughes requested that Council'members' be provided information regarding rate structures and formulas for storm drainage utilities employed by other cities. Kay Johnson, Manager of Renton Chamber of Commerce, 300 Rainier Avenue South, Renton, indicated his understanding that 25% of the cost of the utility will be funded by single family residents, and felt that participants have an obligation to the community to fund the utility in spite of the fact that they may not be experiencing drainage problems. Regarding the utility proposals approved by the cities of Bellevue and Kent, Mr. Johnson cautioned Council to consider various aspects of those programs, i.e. cost to administer and exclusion of P-1 Channel, in making comparisons. As a Renton homeowner, he indicated willingness to pay the additional tax if Council could assure that it would not continue to grow. Mayor Shinpoch clarified Council's options to limit the amount and duration of the charge to avoid heavy interest and borrowing in the future. She also warned that a demand for the service will be created at the time the charge is imposed, and the City must take care not to imply that all improvements will be completed for all areas immediately. Referencing concerns regarding inequitable storm water utility rates, Mr. Webb indicated that garbage and water rates are also inequitable since users pay a meter charge and a minimum garbage charge regardless of the amount they use. RECESS MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY MATHEWS, COUNCIL RECESS FOR FIVE MINUTES. CARRIED. Time: 9:52 p.m. Council reconvened at 10:05 p.m.; roll was called; all members except Keolker, previously excused, were preseent. CONSENT AGENDA Items on the Consent Aenda are adopted by one motion which follows the listing. Council President Mathews requested that Consent Agenda Item 7.b., adoption of Annual Zoning Map, be removed for separate consideration. Site Plan Review Building and Zoning Department requested revisions to Section 4-738, Site Plan Ordinance, Section 4-2303, Mining, Excavation and Grading Ordinance, and Section 4-710, Public Use Zone (P-1) to provide consistency in the site plan review process. Refer to Ways and Means Committee. • Nelson Place Street Vacation Reauest, VAC 002-86 City Clerk transmitted petition for vacation of Nelson Place located between Northern Pacific railroad right-of-way on the north and east to the intersection of Grady Way on the south and west; petition bears signatures representing 100% of ownership. Refer to Board of Public Works for recommendation and Ways and Means Committee for resolution setting public hearing on 8/11/86. Bid Opening - Glencoe Phase II Storm Drain Replacement and 1986 Street Overlay City Clerk reported bid opening 6/18/86 for Glencoe Phase II Storm Drain Replacement and 1986 Street Overlay; five bids; Engineer's estimate: $225,880. Refer to Utilities Committee. (See later action.) Gillespie Claim for Damages - CL 30-86 Claim for damages in the amount of $224.48 filed by Sibyl T. Gillespie, 408 SW Langston Road, Renton, for plumbing and:clean-up expenses following sewage back-up into her home, alleging inadequate connection to main sewer system by the City (5/5/86). Refer to City Attorney and insurance service. National Pride Car Wash Site Plan Appeal, SA-008-86 Appeal orWearing-rxaminer's decision on National Pride Car Wash Site Plan, File No. SA-008-86, filed by John S. Wilson, applicant; property located between NE 3rd Street and NE 4th Street, near Jefferson Avenue NE. Refer to Planning and Development Committee. r, F R 4,� A, _'- o THE CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 ma. • o BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR • MAXINE E.MOTOR, 9,0 co` CITY CLERK • (206) 235-2501 09gT�0 SEPS�M��P June 17, 1986 APPEAL - NATIONAL PRIDE CAR WASH SITE APPROVAL Re: Appeal of Hearing Examiner's Decision, dated May 14, 1986, John S. Wilson - National Pride Car Wash Site Approval, File No. SA-008-86. To Parties of Record: Pursuant to Title IV, Chapter 30, City Code, written appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision has been filed with the City Clerk, along with the proper fee of "$75.00. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the written appeal and other pertinent documents will be reviewed by the Council's Planning and Development Committee and will be considered by the City Council when the matter is reported out of Committee. The Council Secretary will notify all parties of record of the date and time of the Planning and Development Committee meeting. If you are not listed in local telephone directories, please call the secretary at 235-2586. Sincerely, CITY OF RENTON Maxine E. Motor, CMC City Clerk .. _,.` WITTEN APPEAL OF HEARING EXAMINER' S DECISION/RECOMMENDATION TO RENTON CITY COUNCIL.' APPLICATION NAME: FILE NO. SA-008-86 John S. Wilson • National Pride Car Wash The undersigned interested party hereby files its Notice of App 1 f ,th Ma e Decision - or Recommendation of the Land Use Hearing Examiner, dated i' 4 , L7 b 19 1 . IDENTIFICATION OF PARTY APPELLANT: REPRESENTATIVE (IF ANY) : Name: John S. Wilson Name: Frank J. Granger - Address:14124 177th Ave. NE Address: PO Box 816 Redmond, Wa. 98052 Redmond, Wa. 98073-0816 Telephone No. (206) 883-6632 Telephone No. (206) 882-0222 2. SPECIFICATION OF ERRORS (Attach additional sheets if necessary), Set forth below are the specific errors or law or fact upon which this appeal is based: FINDINGS OF FACT: (Please designate number as denoted in the Examiner's Report) 1,13 No.14,16 Error: Please see attached memorandum Correction: CONCLUSIONS: 1,2 ,3 No.4,5 Error: Please see attached memorandum Correction: OTHER: No. ' Error: Introduction of new information relative to the user of the adjacent, contiguous site. Correction: 3. SUMMARY OF ACTION REQUESTED: The City Council is requested to grant the following relief: (Attach explanation, if desired) Reverse the Decision or Recommendation and grant the following relief: Modify the Decision or Recommendation as follows: XXXXX Remand to the Examiner for further consideration as follows: Please refer to the attached memorandum. l` Other: 40--4AN .„8,•01‘ 41 geito - (—,A -06 Ape ' -presentative ign ture 4 Date NOTE: - - -se refer to Title IV, Chapter 30 of the Renton Municipal Code, and Sections 4-3016 and 4-3017, specifically (see reverse side of page) for specific appeal procedures. / • To: Office of the City Clerk City of ,Renton 200 Mill Ave. S. Renton, Washington, 98055 From: John S. Wilson-Applicant Frank xJ81Granger-Representative 14124 177th Ave. NE. 6 Redmond, Washington, 98052 Redmond, Washington, 98073-0816 Re: Appeal to the City Council, City of Renton File # SA-008-86, National Pride Car Wash Hearing Examiner decision, May 14, 1986 Hearing Examiner Request for Reconsideration, June 2, 1986 Date: June 16 , 1986 The Applicant requests that the City Council remand the Hearing Examiner' s decision for further consideration for the following reasons : 1) An action has been filed by ARCO Petroleum Products Company under Filing .Numbers 2-050-86 and SA-051-86 , May 27 , 1986, for the development of an ARCO AM-PM Mini-Market on the site immediately contiguous and adjacent to the east of the subject site. The ARCO site, currently under option by the Applicant is to be sold to ARCO upon site plan approval and building permit issuance. The Applicant' s project and the ARCO project would than be developed simultaneously. 2) The site planning for both sites proposes easements for ingress and egress and parking as necessary. Therefore, due to the joint usage of curb-cuts and traffic across both sites for the benefit of each, the issue of curb-cuts on NE 4th should be reviewed again in light of the Hearing Examiners decision leaving open the threat of curb-cut closure on NE 4th. 3) Further, the Applicant and ARCO desire a 24 hour business operation. As both businesses currently operate on a 24 hour basis in other locations , the impacts , or lack thereof should be reviewed together by the Hearing Examiner in that the businesses are comparable in hours of operation and compatible as to business purpose. . • y r page two Renton City Council Appeal File # SA-008-86 A discussion as to the specific Findings of Fact and Conclusions are attached hereto in the Applicants Request for Reconsideration to the Hearing Examiner. The ARCO filing for Site Plan approval was not available during the Hearing Examiner process. Due to this introduction of new evidence directly impacting the Site Plan approval process for the Applicant, the Applicant requests that the Hearing Examiner review his decision in light of and in conjunction with the ARCO (SA-051-86) Site Plan review. The specific points to be remanded are: 1) Decision item # 1--relating to hours of operation, and, 2) Decision item # 2--closure of driveway on NE 4th. 3) New evidence in the form of "joint use" of the 'two sites. Res • - ubmitted: IMRE ' ohn Wilson data rank J. G ger (date) Ap. ic:nt Representative \` For.Use By City Clerk's Office Only A. I . # AGENDA ITEM RENTON CITY COUNCIL MEETING LBMITTING pt./Div./Bd./Comm. City Clerk . For Agenda Of 6/23/86 (Meeting Date) taff Contact Maxine Motor ,I (Name) Agenda Status: I. UBJECT: Appeal of Hearing Examiner's Consent XX pecision; National Pride Car Wash Site Public Hearing Approval; File No. SA-008-86 Correspondence Ordinance/Resolution //// Old Business Exhibits: (Legal Descr. , Maps, Etc.)Attach New Business Study Session A. City Clerk's Letter Other B. Letter of Appeal ♦ C. Request for Reconsideration; Examiner's Approval : D. Hearing Examiner's Report Response Legal Dept. Yes_ No_ N/A COUNCIL ACTION RECOMMENDED: Finance Dept. Yes No. N/A Other Clearance Refer to Planning and Development Committee FISCAL IMPACT: Expenditure Required $ Amount $ Appropriation- $ Budgeted Transfer Required SUMMARY (Background information, prior action and effect of implementation) (Attach additional pages if necessary.) Appeal filed by John S. Wilson, representing National Pride Car Wash, accompanied by required fee received on :6/16/86. PARTIES OF RECORD/INTERESTED CITIZENS TO BE CONTACTED: SUBMIT THIS COPY TO CITY CLERK BY NOON ON THURSDAY WITH DOCUMENTATION. df OF R4,A 0 THE CITY OF RENTON W® MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 n rn BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR • MAXINE E.MOTOR, OVA `O, CITY CLERK • (206) 235-2501 0 SEP'ce" June 17, 1986 APPEAL - NATIONAL PRIDE CAR WASH SITE APPROVAL Re: Appeal of Hearing Examiner's Decision, dated May 14, 1986, John S. Wilson - National Pride Car Wash Site Approval, File No. SA-008-86. To Parties of Record: Pursuant to Title IV, Chapter 30, City Code, written appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision has been filed with the City Clerk, along with the proper fee of $75.00. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the written appeal and other pertinent documents will be reviewed •by the Council's Planning and Development Committee and will be considered by the City Council. when the matter is reported out of Committee. The Council Secretary will notify all parties of record of the date and time of the Planning and Development Committee meeting. If you are not listed in local telephone directories, please call the secretary at 235-2586. Sincerely, CITY OF RENTON Maxine E. Motor, CMC City Clerk / j. , OF R�� �•0 0 THE CITY OF RENTON U 4/ ® z MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 oIA rn BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR • MAXINE E.MOTOR, 'Q,o `O' CITY CLERK • (206) 235-250I 0 �P 917- 0 SEP� M� ii STATE OF WASHINGTON) , ss, COUNTY OF :KING ) I , Marilyn JIa . Petersen, Deputy City Clerk for the City of Renton, Washington, being duly sworn on oath, deposes and says that she is a.citizen of the United States and a resident of the State of Washington, over the age ;:of 21 and not a party to nor interested in this matter. That on the 17th day of June, 1986, at the hour of 5:00 p.m., your affiant duly mailed and placed in the United States Post Office at Renton, Kina;', County, Washington, by first class mail, to all parties of record, a true and correct NOTICE OF APPEAL OF THE HEARING EXAMINER'S DECISION FILED BY JOHN S. WILSON, REPRESENTING NATIONAL PRIDE CAR WASH : FILE NO. SA-008-86. Marilyn J ' —rsen, Deputy City Clerk SUBSCRIBED ;AND SWORN TO BEFORE me this 17th day of June, 1986. . >?.-- e-- .4--e- e )22,,,,,,,.,-,- Notary Public 'in and for the State of Washington, residing in King County CITY OF RENTO1- N° 16660 FINANCE DEPARTMENT RENTON, WASHINGTON/� 98055 r�/G� 19. .�� RECEIVED OF L 11'r J J—4/6112-`% eff y//m ini. t /lQ"C'wldi ) Received by TOTAL QD I *I J S .• ._ ~ WRITTEN APPEAL OF HEARING EXAMINER' S DECISION/RECOMMENDATION TO RENTON CITY COUNCIL. APPLICATION NAME: FILE NO. SA-008-86 John S. Wilson National Pride Car Wash The undersigned interested party hereby files its Notice of App a1 f the Decision or Recommendation of the Land Use Hearing Examiner, dated May '4, �7 6 19 1 . IDENTIFICATION OF PARTY APPELLANT: REPRESENTATIVE ( IF ANY) : Name: John S. Wilson Name: Frank J. Granger Address:14124 177th Ave, NE Address: PO Box 816 Redmond, Wa, 98052 Redmond, Wa. 98073-0816 Telephone No. (206) 883-6632 Telephone No. (206) 882-0222 2. SPECIFICATION OF ERRORS (Attach additional sheets if necessary) Set forth below are the specific errors or law or fact upon which this appeal is based: FINDINGS OF FACT: (Please designate number as denoted in the Examiner's Report) 1,13 No.14,16 Error: Please see attached memorandum .. Correction: CONCLUSIONS: 1,2 ,3 No.4,5 Error: Please see attached memorandum Correction: OTHER: No. ' Error: Introduction of new information relative to the user of the adjacent, contiguous site. Correction: 3. SUMMARY OF ACTION REQUESTED: The City Council is requested to grant the following relief: (Attach explanation, if desired) Reverse the Decision or Recommendation and grant the following relief: Modify the Decision or Recommendation as follows: XXXXX Remand to the Examiner for further consideration as follows: Please refer to the attached memorandum. _ --_ Other: Ap.. 44i,,& "Mb lh,Olk //44.10 - ' -presentative Sign. ture Date NOTE: ' -.se refer to Title IV, Chapter 30 of the Renton Municipal Code, and Sections 4-3016 and 4-3017, specifically (see reverse side of page) for specific appeal procedu • To: Office. of the City Clerk City of Renton 200 Mill Ave. S. Renton, Washington, 98055 From: John S. Wilson-Applicant Frank J. Granger-Representative 14124 177th Ave. NE. PO Box 816 Redmond, Washington, 98052 Redmond, Washington, 98073-0816 Re: Appeal to the City Council, City of Renton File # SA-008-86, National Pride Car Wash Hearing Examiner decision, May 14, 1986 Hearing Examiner Request for Reconsideration, June 2, 1986 Date: June 16 , 1986 The Applicant requests that the City Council remand the Hearing Examiner' s decision for further consideration for the following reasons : 1) An action has been filed by ARCO Petroleum Products Company under Filing Numbers 2-050-86 and SA-051-86 , May 27 , 1986, for the development of an ARCO AM-PM Mini-Market on the site immediately contiguous and adjacent to the east of the subject site. The ARCO site, currently under option by the Applicant is to be sold to ARCO upon site plan approval and building permit issuance. The Applicant' s project and the ARCO project would than' be developed simultaneously. 2) The site planning for both sites proposes easements for ingress and egress and parking as necessary. Therefore, due to the joint usage of curb-cuts and traffic across both sites for the benefit of each, the issue of curb-cuts on NE 4th should be reviewed again in light of the •Hearing Examiners decision leaving open the threat of curb-cut closure on NE 4th. 3) Further, the Applicant and ARCO desire a 24 hour business operation. As both businesses currently operate, on a 24 hour basis in other locations., the impacts , or lack thereof should be reviewed together by the Hearing Examiner in that the. businesses are comparable in hours of operation and compatible as to business purpose. l • page two Renton City Council Appeal File # SA-008-86 A discussion as to the specific Findings of Fact and Conclusions are attached hereto in the Applicants Request for Reconsideration to the Hearing Examiner. The ARCO filing for Site Plan approval was not available during the Hearing Examiner process. Due to this introduction of new evidence directly impacting the Site Plan approval process for the Applicant, the Applicant requests that the Hearing Examiner review his decision in light of and in conjunction with the ARCO (SA-051-86) Site Plan review. The specific points to be remanded are: 1) Decision item # 1--relating to hours of operation, and, 2) Decision item # 2--closure of driveway on NE 4th. 3) New evidence in the form of "joint use" of the two sites. Res ubmitted: INFIP ,411,46111 1‘,A111 CO *4 ' ohn . Wilson —(data rank J. G ger (date) Ap. is=nt Representative f OF RED e► 0 THE CITY OF RENTON () o°o : ': z MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 2 't. ° o BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR 0 LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER FRED J. KAUFMAN. 235-2593 0,9gTED SEP'C°' June 2, 1986 • John S. Wilson 14124 - 177th Ave. N.E. Redmond, Washington, 98052 Re: Request for Reconsideration National Pride Car Wash SA-008-86 Dear Mr. Wilson: • I have reviewed your request for reconsideration in the above entitled matter and my response follows. While this Office sympathizes with your concerns, there is no new information which demonstrates that a mistake was made requiring alteration of the original decision. If the use proves to be a good neighbor, and traffic considerations do not warrant, the northern driveway would not be affected. While national standards are nice, they should be flexible and acknowledge unique local situations. This car wash is surrounded in two locations by residential uses requiring differing standards. • Please feel free to appeal to the City Council within fourteen days, if this determination is not acceptable. If this Office can be of further assistance, please feel free to give us a call. Sincerely. FRED J. KR1FMAN HEARING EXAMINER FJK/dk cc: City Clerk Building & Zoning Department Public Works Department City Attorney • • NATIONAL r,. PRIDE �: • • To: Fred J. Kaufman Hearing Examiner • Office of the Hearing der City of Renton 0 200 Mill Ave, South Renton, INhshington, 98055 From: John S. Wilson Applicant, National Pride Car Tnhsh 14124 177th Ave, NE.` Redmond, Washington, 98052 Re: Request for Reconsideration File SA-008-86 Hearing Examiners decision, May 14, 1986 Date: May 28, 1986 The Applicant, John S. Wilson, hereby files a Request for Reconsideration. based'-on the following points of information, judgmental interpretation and new information/evidence available after review of the Hearing Findings, Conclusions and Decision. In the discovery phase of the Hearing (public, proponent and City Department testimony) it was reveled that "...The Applicant is contemplating using his adjacent site to house a niini=market and Arco gasoline station. ... Although the Applicants project and the Arco AM-PM mini-market development are separate submittals to the City of Renton, due to shared ins and egress, the Arco project could be similarily impacted by the Hearing Examiners decision which would summarily cal-Ise the demise of both projects. It should be noted for information purposes only that a 24. hour 7-11 (Southland Corporation), store was approved for the subject site under File 4 SA-446-79 on February 5, 1980. Joint use curb-cuts as proposed follows the intent of the Comprehensive Plan to reduce the number of curb-cuts along major arterials. The subject site is identified as being located between major arterials (NE 3rd and NE 4th), with residential development immediately to the west and across 4th to' the north. Access to the subject site is identified as being primarily along its south border, Mr. Blaylock stated that eliminating access to NE 4th would aggravate the traffic situation on NE 3rd. 3201 West Lake Street • Melrose Park, Illinois 60160 • (312) 344-4760 page two During the May 6 continuation, Mr. Norris, Traffic .Engineer, indicated that the City and the County were cooperating in signalizing the Jefferson and NE 3rd intersections to promote left turn accessibility to the areas north of the subject site. This action essentially eliminates the requirement for left turn lanes off 3rd into and out of the subject site provided access off NE 4th is not restricted. • Findings: As a point of fact: 1) There was no opposition to the subject proposal from any member • of the public. . (#5) 2) The zoning is currently E-1. The proposal is a permitted use. (#7) 3) Admittedly judgmental, there is little incentive to develop the site under the Comprehensive Plan designation because of contiguous environmental impacts, traffic, ect. (#8) 4) For the record, the impact of development will be felt primarily _ by four residential units north across 4th from the subject site and immediately west to the housing project. (#10) 5) An adverse affect from 24 hour, 7 days per week operation of the car wash has not been demonstrated. In fact the development of the site with structures, fences and landscaping as proposed may have a positive affect in being sound absorbing and light and glare buffering. (#13) 6) The Applicant proposes the elimination of one curb-cut on NE 4th to be replaced with landscaping. Staff concerns of through traffic should be substantially mitigated with the elimination of left turn access off NE 3rd. (#16) Conclusions: 1) Precisely beranseof the unique site location, a retail/service use seems to be mandated. Development of the subject site will provide an adequate transition and provide the City the opportunity to provide the. same through sensitive site development. Traffic can be directed an site, to the extent possible to exit south to NE. 3rd. However, neighborhood users will still prefer to exit the single north ingress-egress point. (#1) 2) A 24 hour operation can be permitted by appropriate on site lighting treatment (sufficient to preserve security, customer safety and utility), instruction as to headlight usage, internal directional patterns and signs directing engine use. A timing device would tend to trap customers on site or not allow then to finish their work. The car wash is designed to be attendant free. Hiring an attendant would be an unrecoverable cost due to the attendant free nature of the installation and the loss of 10:0019M to 7:00AM revenue. (#2) / page three 3) The Applicant believes there is significant justification for a 24 hour operation: a. The proposed development does respond to a neighborhood need; and,. b. Because of Renton's industrialization many users would be shift • workers who would otherwise not have the car wash convenience available; and, • c. Many apartment t complexes in the area do not provide car wash areas. (#3) The Applicant is an experienced National Pride Car.Wash Owner and operator. - The parent company, National Pride, has aver 200 operating locations throughout the United States. As a national operation, standards of use and hours of operation are common to each of the operating locations. These criteria are the result of public use and desire and have resulted in profitable and "good neighbor" business undertakings. The Applicant therefore requests that reconsideration be given to the following points: 1. That the car wash be allowed to operate 24 hours per day, 7 days per week. 2. That one northerly driveway be permitted on NE 4th without the threat of closure by the City. Resp• 3 .i. _ C : :A\%. 1 :: Jo , . . son Date: -11ha1Ti1Qtvr Ap• icant - • 1-1 97E, '-� May 14, 1986 OFFICE OF THE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND DECISION. APPLICANT: JOHN S. WILSON - NATIONAL PRIDE CAR WASH • FILE NO. SA-008-86 LOCATION: Located between N.E. Third Street and N.E. Fourth Street. near Jefferson Avenue N.E. SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Site Plan approval to build a self-service car wash facility consisting of a 3,976 sq. ft. building with 10 washing bays, 5 vacuum islands, 1 vending island and 25 parking stalls. SUMMARY OF ACTION: ui ing an o r nt Recommendation: Approval with conditions. Hearing Examiner Decision: Approved. with conditions. BUILDING & ZONING The Building & Zoning Department Report was DEPARTMENT REPORT: received by the Examiner on March 18. 1986. PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Building and Zoning Department Report. examining available information on file with the application. and field checking the property and surrounding area, the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: The hearing was opened on March 25, 1986, at 9:10 A.M. in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. The following exhibits were entered into the record: Exhibit #1 - Yellow File containing application. proof of posting and publication and other documentation pertinent to this request. Exhibit #2 - Site Plan dated 3/14/86. Exhibit #3 - Landscape Plan dated 1/29/86. Exhibit #4 - New Site Plan. • Exhibit #5 - New Landscape Plan. Exhibit #6 - Traffic Engineering plan. The hearing opened with a presentation of the staff report by the Zoning Administrator, Roger Blaylock. He entered the first 3 exhibits and proceeded stating the applicant wishes to build a self-service car wash. The site is located in a residential neighborhood, the building will be approximately 3970 sq. ft.. and will provide washing bays, a vacuum island and a parking area where customers can dry off their car. Mr. Blaylock stated the facility will be open 7 days a week. 24 hours a day. The applicant is contemplating using his adjacent site to house a mini-market and Arco gasoline station. With this in mind it was pointed out there is a possibility of a joint curb-cut proposed which follows the intent of the Comprehensive Plan to reduce the number of curb-cuts along major arterials. A short plat has been completed on this property, and site plan approval was felt necessary due to the site's location between major arterials (N.E. 3th and N.E. 4th) and its proximity to the single family area to the north. All utilities are available to the site, and Jefferson Avenue N.E. will be signalized later in the year. Continuing with the review, Mr. Blaylock stated the one story building will contain 10 washing bays for automobiles and one special bay for recreational vehicles: screening and landscaping has been provided to buffer the multiple family and single family residences to the north of the site. R \ • JOHN S. WILSON SA-008-86 May 14, 1986 Page 2 The possibility of additional traffic and its impact on the neighborhood was discussed, and it is felt by the applicant that there should not be more than two persons waiting in line at the same time to utilize the car wash. Access to the subject site is primarily from the southwest corner of the site, noise and glare to the surrounding residences is of concern due to the proposed hours of operation as well as the proposal for future use as a mini market and gasoline supplier. Mr. Blaylock stated the alternative to the noise and glare problem would be to eliminate the access to N.E. 4th Street, which in turn would restrict the functional use of the site and force more traffic onto N.E. 3rd Street. He continued with a review of staff comments with regard to access, compatability with adjacent structures, compliance with the Comprehensive Plan and traffic circulation. It was noted that a national traffic impact analysis was completed and from that study, peak hours were discussed as pertains to the traffic impacts and intrusion into the surrounding neighborhood. Concern was expressed by the Hearing Examiner as to the access to the north and its impacts. Mr. Blaylock recommended approval of the proposal with the condition that the western-most curb cut on N.E. Third Street be eliminated. The Examiner called for testimony in support of the application from the applicant or his representative. Wishing to speak was: John S. Wilson 14124 - 177th Avenue N.E. Redmond, Washington, 98052 Mr. Wilson entered exhibits 4 and 5 into the record and advised the most south-westerly access has been changed since the submittal of the original site plan, and a common driveway has been put in its place that would access both the car wash facility and possible future mini market. Mr. Wilson expressed his belief that the car wash would be difficult to set up without an access to the north due to the traffic impacts that would occur. He believes the new proposed intersection will help the entire area by directing the cars to, and through, the northern access. He said after 10:00 P.M. there is virtually no business at all so he doesn't feel the concerns over lights and glare to the surrounding neighbors are justified. Continuing, Mr. Wilson stated there is a 18 ft. wide lane for access in the new site plan which customers will use for access out of the site, and he has had the building moved 22 ft. to the north to provide for that additional access. At this point the Hearing Examiner stated he was concerned about the two access points for this property and stated he would like to have the new site plan reviewed by various city departments to get their comments on the various traffic and land use concerns. He suggested continuing the hearing for two weeks to receive further input from staff. A date of'April 8, 1986 was set for the continued hearing. Calling for further testimony in support of, in opposition to, or comments from staff, there was no one else wishing to speak. The hearing closed at 10:00 A.M. On May 6, 1986 at 9:00 A.M. this hearing was again opened to review the new site plan and receive comments from the Traffic Engineering Department. Representing staff was Roger Blaylock, Zoning Administrator. He gave a brief review of the request pointing out the previous concerns expressed regarding access on N.E. 3rd or N.E. 4th and the possible intrusion into the surrounding residential area. He had no further comments at this time. Wishing to comment on behalf of the City of Renton, Traffic Engineering Department was: Gary Norris Traffic Engineer Mr. Norris presenthd Exhibit #6, and stated his department was asked to investigate the possibility of improving access to the site from N.E. 3rd to the extent they could minimize access off of N.E. 4th.. He • said his department checked into several alternatives and came to the conclusion that left turn access off N.E. 3rd Street should be restricted. Motorists desiring to go north on N.E. 3rd or N.E. 4th should be directed to the N.E. 4th arterial. He feels in order to ensure safe access to N.E. 3rd, a deacceleration lane should be provided along N.E. 3rd for right-in and right-out lanes to the properties. In response to the Hearing Examiner's inquiry about possibly closing the access for N.E. 4th, Mr. Norris stated there is a joint effort between the City of Renton and King County to place a signal at the intersection of Jefferson and N.E. 3rd Street to promote left turn accessibility to the residential properties in the area. JOHN S. WILSON SA-008-86 May 14. 1986 Page 3 Mr. Blaylock stated he felt it would be possible to eliminate one of the two access points shown on N.E. 4th. possibly the one on the western-most portion of N.E. 4th as shown on the site plan. The Examiner called for further testimony in support of this project. there was no one wishing to speak. There was no one in opposition, and no further comments from staff. The hearing closed at 9:15 A.M. FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & DECISION: Having reviewed the. record in this matter. the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: 1. The applicant. John S. Wilson. has requested approval of a site plan for a self-service car wash on approximately .92 acres of property. 2. The application file containing the application, the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) documentation. the Building and Zoning Department Report. and other pertinent documents was entered in the record as Exhibit #1. 3. Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and SEPA (RCW 43.21C. 1971. as amended), a Declaration of Non-Significance has been issued for the subject proposal by the Environmental Review Committee (ERC), the responsible official. • 4. Plans for the proposal have been reviewed by all City departments affected by the impact of this proposal. • 5. There was no opposition to the subject proposal from any member of the public. 6. The subject site'is located between N.E. 3rd Street and N.E. 4th Street. 135 ft west of Jefferson Avenue N.E. 7. The site was annexed into the City in June 1966 by the adoption of Ordinance 2249. The site was rezoned from the G zoning it received automatically upon annexation, to its current B-1 (Business/Commercial) classification by the adoption of Ordinance 2655 in August, 1971. 8. The map element of the Comprehensive Plan designates the area in which the subject site is located as suitable for the development of medium density multi-family uses, but does not mandate such development without consideration of other policies of the plan. 9. The subject site is part of a B-1 district which is located between the convergence of N.E. 3rd and N.E. 4th Streets. Part of_ this district contains Renton Housing Authority subsidized housing. This housing is west of the subject site. An L-1 district is located south and west of the site. 10. North of the site, north of N.E. 4th Street. is a large R-1 district. Single family homes in this district are located immediately north of the subject site. 11. N.E. 3rd Street is a major arterial. The intersection of N.E. 3rd and Jefferson will be controlled by a new traffic'.signal. N.E. 4th north of the site is a designated collector arterial. Traffic Engineering has recommended a minimization of curb cuts along *N.E. 3rd to protect its arterial status. In addition, the site is located just west of the Jefferson intersection on a curving portion of N.E. 3rd which also makes access a sensitive issue. 12. The applicant proposes constructing a self-service car wash. The facility will comprise a 3.976 sq. ft. building containing 10 washing bays. Five vacuum islands, a vending island and 25 parking stalls to permit wipe down and drying will also be' provided. 13. The facility is proposed to be available 24 hours per day. seven days per week. The Building Division indicated that this could have an adverse affect on the single family homes north of the site. JOHN S. WILSON �..- ;-~' SA-008-86 May 14, 1986 Page 4 14. The applicant modified,the plans in response to the analysis of the Building and Zoning Department. The plans now include one joint use driveway at the southeast corner of the subject site. The drive would be shared between the subject site and the easterly adjacent site, thereby minimizing the curb cuts along N.E. 3rd in this general vicinity. 15. The setback of 10 feet from 3rd would be,landscaped, and there would be a larger landscaped triangle at the extreme southwest corner of the site. A similar triangle of landscaping will be located at the southern end of the building containing the wash bays. A landscaped planting area would be located along the north half of the western property line adjacent to the apartment complex. A 6 ft. high fence would also be included in this area. 16. Two driveways would be located along N.E. 4th, separated by a landscaped area approximately 25 feet deep. The driveways would be opposite single family homes across N.E. 4th. Staff remains concerned that the through access of this site could lead cars to use the site to circumvent the traffic controls at Jefferson and Edmonds. The northern and southern driveways could provide a through route avoiding the controlled intersections. 17. The building would be a one story brick building with a mansard roof. The 10 bays and equipment room would be located within this relatively open structure. Immediately east of the bays, and servicing the bays will be 5 vacuum islands arranged to serve two wash bays each. A parking area to allow hand drying of the washed cars will be located along the western property line. Parking for 25 cars will be provided. • CONCLUSIONS 1. The subject site's location requires sensitive design. While site plan approval was not ordinarily required for the site's B=1 district, during the rezone stage the City Council believed that the location of single family homes north of the site required special consideration. The site itself is sandwiched between single family homes on the north and a major arterial, N.E. 3rd, on the south. The site probably represents an example of one of the worst transition zones in the City. There is nothing to buffer the single family homes north of the site and traffic conditions along N.E. 3rd warrant, at least from the Traffic Engineering perspective, that vehicles be directed and encouraged to exit the site toward those single family homes. Understandably, the applicant desires to create a viable business, but at the same time the applicant must understand that single family homes north of the site and the multi-family apartment complex west of the site are entitled to reasonable protections. A twenty-four hour business in this location does not appear justified, and it would appear that restrictions on operating times would not unreasonably - deny the applicant reasonable use or return on the site. 2. Therefore, the facility shall not be permitted to operate 24 hours per day. While use of the car wash may be minimal during the late night and early morning hours. the location is not well suited to even possible 24-hour a day operation. Single family homes are directly north of the site and.an apartment complex is located west of the northerly half of the site. Both residential areas would be subject to car headlights, advertising signs, glare and automobile engine noise. Cars, even a few entering and leaving the subject site through the north driveways, can have a disturbing affect on single family residents. Car headlights and engine noise will be directed toward these homes. Similarly, night use will affect the apartments located dud-West of the site. Headlights and engine noise will be projected through the bays toward; the apartments. The buffering provided will screen the actual operation, but cannot screen the noise and headlight glare of cars using the northerly driveways. While the operation will generally be unattended, and the washing bays may be open, this Office believes the applicant can install some kind of timing device to close the operation between the hours of 10 PM and 7 AM. 3. There appears to be little if any justification, or community need for a 24-hour self-service car wash. A balancing of interests weighs in favor of a neighborhood both zoned for single family uses and designated in the Comprehensive Plan for single family homes. The apartment complex is entitled to a similar treatment. That apartment site, and even the subject site, is designated for medium density multi-family uses. _ , JOHN S. WILSON `,_., SA-008-86 May 14, 1986 Page 5 A car wash. no matter.how well designed, will be an intrusion into the adjoining residential areas. Residential zoning entails the right to quiet enjoyment, and if not much else, that designation should carry with it quiet enjoyment during the late evening and early morning hours. 4. The Comprehensive Plan requires preservation of residential values and segregation of different intensities of land uses. Preservation of residential values can't be accomplished by permitting commercial self-service car washes across the street or on an adjacent lot without offering not only buffers but some limitations on operations. Even then, this Office would prefer to close the northerly driveways, but Traffic Engineering indicates this would have a negative affect on N.E. 3rd in this location. 5. At this juncture this Office will defer to the recommendation of the Traffic Engineering Division that the northerly drives are necessary to minimize traffic conflicts along N.E. 3rd, but the site plan will be conditioned so that the applicant . is on notice that the City maintains the right to restrict access along the north property line if such access should either interfere with the residential nature of the area, or the property is utilized as a defacto alternative link between N.E. 4th and N.E. 3rd, permitting drivers to avoid signals at either Jefferson or Edmonds. 6. Similarly, restrictions on left turns to or from the site may be imposed by the City if safety considerations indicate such limitations are necessary. Such restrictions for access along Rainier Avenue have been imposed to provide for safe and limited access where traffic conditions warrant and this location along N.E. 3rd may warrant similar measures. • 7. Traffic Engineering has recommended an acceleration/deceleration lane adjacent to the site and this shall be required. DECISION The Site Plan is approved subject to the following conditions: 1. The car wash shall be closed and all operations curtailed between the hours of 10 P.M. to 7 A.M. The applicant may utilize timing devices to accomplish this objective. 2. One, or both of the northern driveways may be closed by the City if in its discretion those driveways have an adverse or deleterious affect on the residential community north of the subject site. 3. The City, in its sole discretion, may restrict left turns to or from the site from N.E. 3rd. 4. The applicant shall have to provide an acceleration/deceleration lane subject to the approval of the Traffic Engineering Division. ORDERED THIS 19th day of May. 1986. /6 ....------ FRED J. KAUF AN HEARING EX INER .y TRANSMITTED THIS 14 th day of May. 1986 to the parties of record: John S. Wilson 14124 - 177th Avenue N.E. • Redmond. Washington. 98052 Gary Norris Traffic Engineer City of Renton • JOHN S. WILSON SA-008-86 May 14. 1986 Page 6 TRANSMITTED THIS 1.4th day Of May. 1986 to the following: Mayor Barbara Y. Shinpoch Councilman Richard M. Stredicke Richard Houghton. Public Works Director Larry M. Springer. Policy Development Director Members. Renton Planning Commission Ronald Nelson, Building & Zoning Director Glen Gordon. Fire Marshal Roger Blaylock. Zoning Administrator Lawrence J. Warren. City Attorney Renton Record-Chronicle Pursuant to Title IV. Section 3015 of the City's Code. request for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before May 28. 1986. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is based on erroneous procedure. errors of law or fact. error in judgment. or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for review by the Examiner within fourteen (14) days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific errors relied upon by such appellant. and the Examiner may. after review of the record. take further action as he deems proper. An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Section 3016. which requires that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk. accompanying a filing fee of $75.00 and meeting other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection or purchase in the Finance Department. first floor of City Hall. The Appearance of Fairness Doctrine provides that no ex parte (private one-on-one) communications may occur concerning land use decisions. This means that parties to a land use decision may not communicate in private with any decision-maker concerning the proposal. Decision-makers in the land use process include both the Hearing Examiner and members of the City Council. All communications concerning the proposal must be made in public. This permits all interested parties to know the contents of the communication and would allow them to openly rebut the evidence. Any violation of this doctrine would result in the invalidation of the request by the Court. The Doctrine applies not only to the initial public hearing but to all Requests for Reconsideration as well as Appeals to the City Council. For purposes of these decisions and recommendations the terms "Should" and "Shall" are to be considered mandatory. The term "May" will be considered discretionary. When the report is a recommendation to the City Council the terms "should" and "shall" are intended to inform the City Council that if they approve the recommendation the items should be mandatory to preserve the intent of the decision. .y • I. •t i \ � � I •,r::C �/ ? liij:• „l i `; _ 1 ^I 'J� � I. I; •' •••.\ J G•t.�_riiC CnC � �� 1 •gip. •`.,r , ,. r. M•y ;I' - ���:1 I �, •• 1\\, `. 1. i ro_rrlt`o.v rc+ 7 A • 7 'Y 'ka• r' ' . '\ v1'� - a.�s•.' r•'p7r11�•• ' �I� I l�� �It ( .A••,y'/ .l yC+a� • '.r �+ If_:",- �: 1•..', • ; •\' ri i __1°i .�., ../ �• .ifs .V' ^rb '1'a,.:� '�,Le.._ - :1. lt. � • • ..;�ry(. '. 16 -..' L FT / \_J dfNDSOR 14..S } . j-•� 1-lr:i- kiiiii i .4' 6' ..-�:. .:-q �1,1,4; ,� r z- ^- ' t h. ./.• • • • . . "1' l` w T • fi g 1 I ::ri!TR. t '"•-•-• ••-•"// • •!,1 irr)1 p 7 l'. / •-•• ; ; l• _ a I_ -a .* r r� G- R-4 G-1 '' • .i 1 is ,i..�Lr 1:;' .71 /A.. . / Z. �' -/ �. '\ L-1 •• %, —1.1,. 2 ,;(..ti :....... i , 4 • ,- Q� ' :4 -..4. t . :f r! 7 :1-7 / 2 . • .j".• lZT7 .../ \• . 1, o+ r •., ' Q •;)•I / • iii CCM:':(P1 •• • • a •. 7 e. ` A : / JI (� - c vR\\ I � — ' o- ' /r'\"- r ` ", • . ,, G 1 - >, • —� � . G; ` G-1 i. . .7• H1 :� , . \ s • G• . --. .•_ " B-1 �: . - - - _R-1`, C • ---ti.� •` P—'1 r"`y. .:.ter•'e^� '//� �, . r 1 JOHN S. WILSON .. SA-008-86 APPL I CANT JOHN S. WILSON TOTAL AREA - .92ACRE PRINCIPAL ACCESS N.E. 3RD ST AND N.E. 4TH ST EXISTING ZON-ING B-1, BUSINESS USE EXISTING USE UNDEVELOPED PROPERTY PROPOSED USE CAR WASH FACILITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN MEDIUM DENSITY MULTI-FAMILY COMMENTS i ,;i:'f i•: �y�, .•t s ' +�,�!'!%'r'ri .'F 1. •v r7�r,j�}�y,:Ct•r�'' !T`.::i.rr, •i' ,{•+ti�'i'1.t''•�t.s •f�.•1 .. •�- •�+j,J�;i ' -S i piPl?. ' li �;;T�1'B g �.T {{t� •i jF`.J ; 1"•,',.'f�`!,� • i.n°}'F t'' ./f1-:•:1 ,,~j` '1h,!'t -1�" ay:..f1, '1.',�2;,,•,1:, •4 ..;,,• ,rn ., ''ry..: I^.' t„:.i,, �1,,�•14. p lk• .) Y'•• ;i' iL'f_/ ♦..'' _ .• 999TTT I: - #1�. 'M, •.r ry7 -1 1 r,',. .'.1" '^;',f•,' •:3 i fg•. . '.g �!•f �tt 1. .. 1 �g� • '� �� <' t����:i'. fi ''j5.'''t::,.wr. t .•�'I. :;1.h�'�.'r/`j' .�. ` �: • t• ;• ..``j��ry,i c "giV :A• ri' F'ti:lt a ia'•,�t7�'A1P1 i'� , 4,? �[ .t t 1 's; ,. ''Y,:..1, 1..,.:114";�1 : ••1 1f' + :� ,. �.y :r6 %rrr~ •a• .n °3,,Ii•r, co .1'1 2' ••o y`�' i�,-. -1.. .1,., pLl ., F" Via$' •kc"•' N-7'.1 + - -R,'.�: «, . '. , •T• • 'h9,te_ ,,, y'f('- lk 1,•r,.t C i±•iltit.!. (. '..{I Il 4q'y y4.. t' t it �y Ia Y '• t t t:•��t' N. ,'i :� ti,�: ;!�4161 /� ~'' ,` ,,-Jir;ll•w. �. � \ {�7n" +1 V h •";111'''',4•4'.4;•:;;; 'S�.ty' , \ .�� L,+ .1y... �_/ f y1j � ' • `a ♦ •fS":'•' �.J �'1��'F�C••• ii' % ^.!(. ...r''� �rt^1,•: ' \ 'ti. �y i, t-_._1 • • • Ir:l '` � 't ` l) -- - I v a • • • s\ SE, \ o i -� •12. \ c \, '� \ ' a Z.,.11..'7.ix/i..•/-..-..'..1Q.7.'........... • • • • r \n4. rl - III.}r` ;\ \7i� / Vie: �)-\)y' • . (.• \ . -.;e...., - .:„,,1 * --l',3• �` jj �.�1 • \v h \ :I 1--. • ) Z 'r f' \ 40' t� .� n I yl •� • N •1 • .L �/ vl Ih r s ''� JJ u�� �� ��i� t� ;'• 1::Vd11'J i• . . D C�i I./^/ \ , , N 11 . ' ItnU•."hro'wLSi - haVC' •4:LfrYIF.'x9+^.+2 +w.faSTC•P'�T.•747twar:f DI . .., 'te.• .:,i•i:::::::::::. •• :::::: .1 l .--I- I i r•sn...- . • _,L_____ •,• ' . ., e .•As. ••:•:::::.... ./. us. •.:.:. • ..,* sralb..'iii Al .. • ) - ;) tiEspopittill . ill: ::iili : LAND LE ELEMENT i • 4.1.:•:,-, fiat: : .........:a . gigili :::::::: • 'I! • .•••:.:::::::::•,)-07.t.t.; p i====i :iiii:i:. • ram .i:.7- ...1. outlaw I::*: . . s %••': 4\ 111111111115111•3 ...:...:. 1111111111MIN 6'•:•:•:•: '11111•11111111.,:•:•:• Single Family '• Commercial .,,•••• .. , . III -7A. 'f..rdi . \ • :•:.:.: .i:-.i:-.:•V Low Density ....:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•: Office / Office Par -- / 0. . _ Multi-Family \ 1 v - ..; k . -• - . •0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • '" :::::::::inMi Medium Density .......• .11,- : ...:::::::::::::::::::::: ................ Public/Quasi-Publ VI 4 . iiiiiiiii::. iiiii Multi-Family ........ .......• :, -.•••7 ' - •;:c :... . ,'4.;? •''..'4. • ..., • ''•:.: .*:t.1; .:ed:,,,.:&,•.- :: 13.,,S41% High Density ,,,,,,,,::••,- Light Industrial Multi-Family . --- : . 4144.1 .-.„••• •:,...••••••••.,`..Trz:F..ii.c: F.: J --SW:!..;:X); NI • 111P4!: r . .`•• ••4,.T.:-ce."-s-7--7e:- . -...... -%. • l'ilimill• 'c.;:f..•,:::-:?i,'::v.:•:•:.;fi.. , •:,.....c.:'• • 43:n% • • h 4...1.......: . ..•Cr.• • • 6 0 • *•4 •••••,,:•.' ••t. 6 :.P.6.%W • Recreation 6•6••• Heavy Industrial . i • -....1.,,:•:.--..-: ._ 16 • • • -•-•.-;.•,. • .\404.11Nt .. - il.,..(.:k _ • qv A-0,. . I A . si:kgii.';•; Greenbelt !di" s 4. . .----.-.----------...-• Manufacturing Pa . tv,..-,..,:. . / Multiple Optic 1_ • ..,..t....4.. fill ••.-: ...::•rc .• •Av.2 ' I 4:.t....!.:• ::; 4:.e1.k -;. ...r..i k I _ - 1 :, .:, ,i •-4., 1 - ,, .• f,;(1V.;::if::;i„.;:......1.,,, , I} .000 ::-::::::: ,,-- ••••:•, .... . -. . -, . 7:...-t, i• I . . ‘. ""Ati,:: ::::•_ ! ..4.'•`.!-;.;,' ! •- % . • .z • . -.1 0( . ". 4!... u . • ‘M/1111 .•! ke•1;!11111110• •• ,- 0 '' (1;11 VA.'. IIII I---.6. ail; r 7.0.r oaiiir -----.,, 1; ...____A :K:i*i:::::i MP‘ 1-'...:'is•?.•.. Aar' *i:::?':::':tr.:411i •• •,.b.. . -• e.".1. ii ... . 4 •• 111:::". :51:>-:i'll'ail . `.• .:..,: el . ..0..0 ii isei daiss-il c• . • .\i:_;;1_• II • a i .1. ____... • iillainige • . •a•,,. griFiiit 7--)_,... r ;•.co•. . 0.4 1.:,,,„*.' I, .. 11111V W-411-4......- •...... 00000n -4- 1:, .; ii::::::.::.:...,„,.,,,__. :10;#11,,,:my .... lab] mmi :........0.:000,...,(: , -,..7...ic; LI l • • •° -4•°•°. r.' .. MilaffitOin. 'Ad : • 1. mil ii i I Ilir.11 •00.0.•I .•:-/ 000.0. .0000• 7' • . • 0 0 0 0 .0 1 (•::::: ::: Min; .:.•:•14$7.."1176 ooacou I 4;fee •:•:•:•:•:- i. misrA -......- •••::- fair- 00•••••_ •••••••tt• * i• : Allpi4;- %:::Nill. 400.e.(404 i . . i. Co • 0 • • o .,• • • ' .11 . loom L.....3 o • • • • 1., • 0 •' , ::;:i*i:::, 1 1 .11.11.1 r , • • 0 • • • , .:i: "• . . . , ..'‘• , • , V.... i • • • • • • • • . . . .:.:• 1 . • • • • • i. • • ,, Irli 4, 001/00:0713.-0.:01 ,_ 0 . • • 0 • 0 • 0 0 i . mg 1111).-6r, 0'0°1" . I 1111111LTO • •, • . • • in. o. •. • .. . 4 ,• .4 ill . - . . . • • . . . . • . . ,. .. s. ,...... . ..:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.. . •••• .•. ,. .•• 0•• -. , i::1••;•'' (;),,`. 110(r. . •••••:•:: ': • • • • • • • • '•,. ‘ -4- .0 i . c ••• • • • obo •• o. .:•:::•:•:.:•• .. . c•.• les ...o 0. :::y:':''• :::::::i:i::::::'w 7741‘s I. • • • • o' 000bo \ , - • • o 8 0 , II!..0,,, 0.0, 10.•Yt III . , .4 . :...... . te • • • • • * 11\ Lk , 111 0°V.1•111111 1111. .--- ..::ii., .... .:: .t,,,111 0 0 0 • • ;, . •••0 SIR • - 0•.-to ask \- 1-,..• ,.‘ 1 if& 1.1;-.. • • • • • • • .„. .2, • • • • • o r., a„ .t-, "t 1, •"=i'^ii••-.11.,". •° ° .1._r.... ....,. r Rot 0•••• 0..41N 9 P 101 ,,,f •:•,• ...„ • . .1--.,.41' :O...0. •'••,,.••••• 1 EN ilielINZ 01 . ... .... ':.;..ri*:::: :::''10111. (I.42.6' 0.-?3,-ifi• et- itii st;:-i:- omio..ocgv mf,:i.0-:-,-,:]: . . ....„: ,,,, . • . . olitte‘ til .. 'I •• I k a I aii--:•-:::,.•-:-:-.--:. *... .- .,. -diz'int 4E4 it - `'‘••• / ; isgeb , ...' 4./.7.7.7.7.:.:.:Irs: , iiiiii. .- 2-"tt'74-',:,„*. '-isiissiilifi:::::r z•Tgithriv;p i;i:i::.: i.,,•::iiiii::::.' Snap, .Ilillaink 4fir 7 A , ..:§iiiiiiip ii:::::.;:::i:i i:...•000'00:00-`1600:0076000:..o.:::::::::::::::::::: i a a.a.iii,,,,s,.! .:iiiii i iiiiii7-:iiiii::-Ailir _1 r;,111:1 i Fol.! • ,I s.6fii.,•„‘ `c • ...::::::K:i:i:K:Kai: .0000000.0000000.00..0 0 0 0 0°0 0 0 0 0• ',':':*:•:':':*:'::•.f..::.......... ...:.;:i:::::i:.::.:::•;:i:i:i::: :i:::::•::::M:K:::::, •:)lila .16;f11 •(* .q, 4W " •- •:*i:K::::*M:K:i:i••K:i .°0°0°0°0°0°0°00°00°0°0°0°0°0°00°0°. ..'••I.. .,:::,:::,:::: - .000000000_0_ .::::::: .0, I'm p.a." ' :fWaTTM.M.aFT8WW0 v....v 00 ge 1141,111W , Bin., •z. ....... ::1E•igimii•;ii .....000%.00.0.00.0.00m00000000.0.• fr.:4.. .... • \ • r:,,:mo• ... :•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:.::•:•:•:- •00c.0.06.00,30•30....• i .-:.::::::::::::::::: a.. • C..i• iilept0001*"tri di I:. 0 0.00.0 0. . .•:.::.::::.::.:::;.::::::.::::::.::.::::.::.::::.:::.::.::: .00 00 00 0000 AO 00.0 00 00 00 00 00 00 0000 00.0. it gii....:•:*::::: . '1• Pill. • I ..••• •" i 4- 6,..cp v- .5-/ • ,.. s lir r i °c.c.°. . .............. . :• . * , . :::::::::::::::LI..••• .0.0.0.0.0.0.000.0. . ,.................. .. • •00000 L :•:•:•:•:•:•:•::•:•:•:•:•:. ,- • •00000000• . •,. .....:•:•:•:•:•: I """- i • - .....%C•••• ::' i,\ / ••0000• .. .:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•::::::: '• ' ::•::::::*::::::::::::::. 00000000 .I•.. •:.:. •••••••,,- •fy. •);•.N . -.... •• SOUP- ren. ., k •,c,.,. : .•• . -,re•' ..-• Oi j.0 .4 .•••4046,41.111.a‘‘.1:t!..,.(::11 •. ;• :::::::::::::::::::::::::: ,f IV-fi .°°•.°°0°0°.. .ftr :::-:•:......:••/....:: "..1 r, mai •o• -•' • • itoss • ••• . .•:,-.1 c .::::::::::::•:::::::::::: • •• .....•••• • 'di :-:,.-:•::::::::::::.:. - ::•.:.;',:: . ::::::::::::::::•:•:':::* •rl ..tik..-..,..•i •'•. it :-..*:':'-'-'••••••:•• •J r.: . yr, . -- ast :••••tu . .Z..•1:, .- '::::iiWi::i:'. .:/,;.. •;,.•'-'4,•,i;•,•",7•5:r6,;;;/; .:•:•::::::*::::::::::: 00 ..,•••,.. ,i•-,' V-4-• ';;••1*...- -4' 4..../ 5(4. ...I.:4'., . ••!:-.•;•.'?•.-1.',3•••:.;•::::::5.;42:‘,..i.,%1:. .:::.i:i:::::::i:i:::::: ;.'Will/ .1...:-;:..i..;?. "c.ii-i,.;•::!.,..A 0 i'l,' .:,,1?.;?, ':•4,::::::::,-;;•.;•,•?; •?;:?4;,5•;•::-',i,r;,:,;/,,, ,'..;::,..°,!4'7`.?,;.., ::;.*:::i.:..i:...:g: .1111011 .1:i i j';';',;... rb411 ,- ..'..i` •le,CF0•47V-' whe."-t.11-1 .•%I-A•:).-,•'''•••;),;11'"?- "•-•-•;:...:(1.'a••,•--,0 r4:(... -•:•:-::::. . i...:d ' s• .•-... -,..1"X 4.1' II"- •.0 f•lil 1•;* f." •'4°TO„.'`...r °.••!'....., m''' ,,,:,.V:.:1-, - ..,.-•.' • -... •• ,. N, .<1.6. ' "Ilk '''.6'• •P up•• • . - -,.:-:‘Iv, .-zsz,t(z• .9:11111, '.'.<‘• - -,,,,,... '•i•ft. . If .,e• • • `f••••1C•s•fle,• • .•:, r•. ...•:f..;:.;i../4:11.3•it,.f(.. • • • • !...ri • .:....1`....C..:•;.C.!.:;!_.....:.:..!...1.....4447:711!iii" 111111111111W4•...5•3*.:.4::•;CAt7r:r•• . CA.. 7.77.,:ri..::::::::I.,:.....L.:::4:ei Z - ...t.;.V.A%;:i...'1:;:ti:1•.....!..•-:". . 111 . . .. 7..:,:.i, ...:..cl, e;i)l e i. 4 eillki N. 'tell 4•S•riG.p.•Yc.,1;;:•T•....fOr.S". ...•.:J5: 1. " it • 0.Y1 "L •-1.1., ..e.• •:, ••.•0..1%••1•43 :4. N ' 4, " :_oLltv,"Al-.i01.-...it05.1.••:.(;:....,..ii,...z- ..,`,c- _.._ 1-S"::-.W;Eip:a:P.-..,...,,,., -. _ gib III _. .. _ 1 0.0. . 0000 ... ...•...,....Q• „-,.......tA,::••••,-,`,AN .e.(7- •C.• "r•r,':•.(. •-•e'L .i. •••••(: ''.(•' •0)..*."'. tl:•SN'0,..••'.*.,•.-0 i...:-.'" 're. .. N.‹... -:*r er„ 4.v-sr , .5? •(t; I, .. d • ••',.•.i. ::,'. I...t• ;.:.fj . ... P. .00 ..z.....einer.„...„0. .9,,e•‘:V C•1.07.. •, W.,'r.1 •• •`. N .‘• ;I: 'I': !:::....••.•..‘..,,,,.,. . *t...r,.•'-°.0,..r. .i.t IA::;1c.?/•);`,....rt..•,`.;.A..1.0..!,I..i0iV rt ct.o...A(n.C.:N:0:••*••.7..•.'.•...•..;0•''.•.',.r 74..0„4 i,9i1;,C:Wd:.z"„°,;'<!:j.,,Z_r._7:•2:,1....„.,0:.:-•;.i.i‘......Zz IwA, .V.I '. ..:,•:•r.r-..<-7.„:. :4ce. :? ' .: E . :' • • 0.. 1` ) • , ;u - e . ii .• :. ..6 a..1.. f .. " 4 " e6 ? ,,,1t •.F•.•..g..t..71,•.......:•.,.?,:•..:..r•.,.). '4- •,.. .:. . :•:-f:4:-.4....4.''''..."..7. .7. •' -,*:':",:',:v:' • ••": " t'" :Vd.•'::,,:.•l) ...fi•1." •:".'11).1) ..9t•'11."ci"1.1.•••••....,.'..i): 1•..„,t).; : e .'"•-,, .4.,41-71 ..q.,.„ .- -.--- ,. . .. .:.::::::.::•:::::.::::::::.. (1.......0...,1.,1,:.?:„.,:, ,o. •....4, •. •i r,?..m...;,.;. ‘‘.‘,.. 1.1....‘..iS...i:\!:%.€,41...."0"-g:t.:AI'. - •••Pne.1264c4,,,, 1,4•1,.:;-,.. .:,„,„..t'.: . ,.......i.!,:sb.., .• .•0.,• , ....,... ..:.i--.--iiii:iiiiim:::ii.. .,,;,••.r,.....p.;:. "- e -...-...0..... .f.I.e .:::: v..-e,-.*:.0,1..•.,,.. • ,„ ‹.--vei:0'4-...i(70,-c.,._"cr L...t.-,5- Iwo. ,.... .'..wiii:::ii;;i; i:::::::.....c,.'.•; z:..1:;.,•., _ e eer 4. •••-•.... 444. ..i•er•ft•-r.7.t.-472-147.1.,....1..e.•::, , ...,,...0 0,., . ...,..0;• 3,...0.., vv.°. ..,... . 00.04,.. •:•,.:••••:-:::::.:.:.:...,..‘,....•• - •.., ii ,..,% .. .. . - •-•.-- 44.0.0.40 .. r i ' --________ - ' ' • 'V .v000• ...,* ,o• .: •::::::::::::::::::::::::::..:..-:....:: .. .i• 's ,..I.i•,,pt • • .), •... r -. --:•:: ::::::::.:,:-.:::*::::::•.• ••• .. • '•••••••"•• •• • • •"-.." i ,., .. r• , / •,;•:4„,.., --- •••• •. • •• •••;.•,•,....v•...••• .:. : e. - -.. .. i •:':*':.!•:::::*K,:f:,' .•.''' • jos oVo°0 ‘ .).:•in."'to - '.-1 • - . .&•ti..,-.:11. •' '' • • :..., NVo.....t .,.!'• "oy.' ‘ 1 i..'...;17...2.8.iii.-.t:::.71'.iT'';.1b:,f Irc:.;%*•.•:til-.ill.i•...'q j rc i.:1.P.tn:::.ctP 1..1.1;.t;:::i ni..;:'is:.)..".71:..411111..'•%'.- •• • ......‘ ::-.111W1 .4 .eoodlo• ii,N. \ ., \ i , 0.00. .00.0 •..). 0 0.• •00.. •... •000.0 1 c.... ,.._..,. ............ . •• • • . .••:•••••••v.• ••..•••-a.C-4 C...51.,-im•• • -0 ".3.-... ., ..: : .•. • `1,..'ci,.....s.ci,.-....w4).••::,.. ...v....;;•,::. .1.•••:.. ... .;.•,;4\z•ff ..:::.: • . ... . ... . 411 c•ifeerr'..i ;g14,0 1:: :..6%';',0 to°0%%% i .4 F:'''%•‘ ...;t:.0`.•Kl..4.1 • .1 0 0 •111.•:::!::.:::.:::...r. .• e., .c.(3 c..:. . 41:::.,..t.441111,;;:6!..e.i.:::;.1.cs.i.;;;;I:.:,...,01*...i."Ci.l.. OF R4,A �am ;1fir lg l O THE CITY OF RENTON °�;. MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 o BARBARA' Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER 9° FRED J. KAUFMAN. 235-2593 o9,4 SEP Ek0'P June 2, 1986 John S. Wilson 14124 - 177th Ave. N.E. Redmond, Washington, 98052 Re: Request for Reconsideration National Pride Car Wash SA-008-86 Dear Mr. Wilson: I have reviewed your request for reconsideration in the above entitled matter and my response.follows. _ • While this Office sympathizes with your concerns, there is no new information which demonstrates that a mistake was made requiring alteration of the original decision. If the use proves to be a good neighbor, and traffic considerations do not warrant, the northern driveway would not be affected. While national standards are nice, they should be flexible and acknowledge unique local situations. This car wash is surrounded in two locations by residential uses requiring differing standards. Please feel free to appeal to the City Council within fourteen days, if this determination is not acceptable. If this Office can be of further assistance, please feel free to give us a call. Sincerely, FRED J. K FMAN HEARING EXAMINER FJK/dk cc: City Clerk Building & Zoning Department Public Works Department City Attorney f, _ RECEIVED NATIONAL MAY 2 81986PRIDE •R p,� CITY Fi eRxaEnnN TON ozk To: Fred J. Kaufman Hearing Examiner Office of the Hearing Examiner City of Renton 200 Mill Ave. South Renton, Washington,. 98055 Fran: John S. Wilson Applicant, National Pride Car ash 14124 177th Ave. NE. Redmond, Washington, 98052 Re: Request for Reconsideration File # SA-008-86 Hearing Examiners decision, May 14, 1986 - " Date: May 28, 1986 The Applicant, John S. Wilson, hereby files a Request for Reconsideration. based an the following points of information, judgmental interpretation and new information/evidence available after review of the Hearing Examiners Findings, Conclusions and Decision. In the discovery phase of the Hearing (public, proponent and City Department testimony) it was reveled that "'...The Applicant is contemplating using his adjacent site to house a mini-market and Arco gasoline station. ..." Although the Applicants project and the Arco AM-PM mini-market development are separate submittals to the City of Renton, due to shared ingress and egress, the Arco project could be similarily impacted by the Hearing Examiners decision which would surily cause the danise of both projects. It should be noted for information purposes only that a 24 hour 7-11 (Southland Corporation) store was approved for the subject site under File # SA-446-79 on February 5, 1980. Joint use curb-cuts as proposed follows the intent of the Comprehensive Plan to reduce the number of curb-cuts along major arterials.. The subject site is identified as being located between major arterials (NE 3rd and NE 4th), with residential development immediately to the west and across 4th to the north. Access to the subject site is identified as being primarily along its south border. Mr. Blaylock stated that eliminating access to NE 4th would aggravate the traffic situation on NE 3rd. 3201 West Lake Street • Melrose Park, Illinois 60160 • (312) 344-4760 page two During the May 6 continuation., Mr. Norris, Traffic .Engineer, indicated that the City and the County were cooperating in signalizing the Jefferson and NE 3rd intersections to promote left turn accessibility to the areas north of the subject site. This action essentially eliminates the requirement for left turn 'lanes off 3rd into and out of the subject site provided access off NE 4th is not restricted. Findings: As a point of fact: 1) There was no opposition to the subject proposal from any member of the public. . (#5) 2) The zoning is currently B-1. The proposal is a permitted use. (#7) 3) Admittedly judgmental, there is little incentive to develop the site under the Comprehensive Plan designation because of contiguous environmental impacts, traffic, ect. (#8) 4) For the record, the impact of development will be felt primarily by four residential units north across 4th from the subject site and immediately west to the housing project. (#10) 5) An adverse affect fran 24 hour, 7 days per week operation of the car wash has not been demonstrated. In fact the development of the site with structures, fences and landscaping as proposed may have a positive affect in being sound absorbing and light and glare buffering. (#13) 6) The Applicant proposes the elimination of one curb-cut on NE 4th to be replaced with landscaping. Staff concerns of through traffic should be substantially mitigated with the elimination of left turn access off NE 3rd. (#16) Conclusions: 1) Precisely because of the unique site location, a retail/service use seems to be mandated. Development of the subject site will provide an adequate transition and provide the City the opportunity to provide the. same through sensitive site development. Traffic can be directed an site, to the extent possible to exit south to NE 3rd. However, neighborhood users will still prefer to 'exit the single north ingress-egress point. (#1) 2) A. 24 hour operation can be permitted by appropriate on site lighting treatment (sufficient to preserve security, customer safety and utility), instruction as to headlight usage, internal directional patterns and signs directing engine use. A timing device would tend to trap customers on site or not allow them to finish their work. The car wash is designed to be attendant free. Hiring an attendant would be an unrecoverable cost due to the attendant free nature of the installation and the loss of 10:00PM to 7:00AM revenue. (#2) f page three 3) The Applicant believes there is significant justification for a 24 hour operation: a. The proposed development does respond to a neighborhood need; and, b. Because of Renton's industrialization many users would be shift workers who would otherwise not have the car wash convenience available; and, c. Many apartment complexes in the area do not provide car wash areas. (#3) The Applicant is an experienced National Pride Car Wash Owner and operator. The parent cuupany, National Pride, has over 200 operating locations throughout the United States. As a national operation, standards of use and hours of operation are comnon to each of the operating locations. These criteria are the result of public use and desire and have resulted in profitable and "good neighbor" business undertakings. The Applicant therefore requests that reconsideration be given to the following points: 1. That the car wash be allowed to operate 24 hours per day, 7 days per week. 2. That one northerly driveway be permitted on NE 4th without the threat of closure by the City. F1] 'tted: John S Wi on Date: -,..)1( E ('Ff(DI Applican AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING STATE OF WASHINGTON ) )ss. County of King ) DOTTY KLINGMAN being first duly sworn, upon oath, deposes and states: That on. the 14th day of May. , 1986 , affiant deposited in the mails of the United States a sealed envelope containing a decision or recommendation with postage prepaid, addressed to the parties of record in the below entitled application or petition. SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this /4 %H day ofRY , 1986_. — --------- - --- ---- --------- 0- Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at IRA:NTDIJ , therein. Application, Petition, or Case #: SA-008-86 - JOON S. WILSON-NATIONAL PRIDE CAR WASH (The minutes contain a list of the parties of record.) I 1,197E `--' May 14. 1986 OFFICE OF THE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND DECISION. APPLICANT: JOHN S. WILSON - NATIONAL ,PRIDE CAR WASH FILE NO. SA-008-86 LOCATION: Located between N.E. Third Street and N.E. Fourth Street, near Jefferson Avenue N.E. SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Site Plan approval to build a self-service car wash facility consisting of a 3.976 sq. ft. building with 10 washing bays, 5 vacuum islands, 1 vending island and 25 parking stalls. SUMMARY OF ACTION: Building and Zoning Department Recommendation: • Approval with conditions. Hearing Examiner Decision: Approved, with conditions. BUILDING & ZONING The-Building & Zoning Department Report was DEPARTMENT REPORT: received by the Examiner on March 18. 1986. PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Building and Zoning Department Report, examining available information on file with the application. and field checking the property and surrounding area, the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: The hearing was opened on March 25, 1986, at 9:10 A.M. in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. The following exhibits were entered into the record: Exhibit #1 - Yellow File containing application, proof of posting and publication and other documentation pertinent to this request. Exhibit #2 - Site Plan dated 3/14/86. Exhibit #3 - Landscape Plan dated 1/29/86. Exhibit #4 - New Site Plan. Exhibit #5 - New Landscape Plan. Exhibit #6 - Traffic Engineering plan. The hearing opened with a presentation of the staff report by the Zoning Administrator, Roger Blaylock. He entered the first 3 exhibits and proceeded stating the applicant wishes to build a self-service car wash. The site is located in a residential neighborhood, the building will be approximately 3970 sq. ft., and will provide washing bays, a vacuum island and a parking area where customers can dry off their car. Mr. Blaylock stated the facility will be open 7 days a week. 24 hours a day. The applicant is contemplating using his adjacent site to house a mini-market and Arco gasoline station. With this in mind it was pointed out there is a possibility of a joint curb-cut proposed which follows the intent of the Comprehensive Plan to reduce the number of curb-cuts along major arterials. A short plat has been completed on this property, and site plan approval was felt necessary due to the site's location between major arterials (N.E. 3th and N.E. 4th) and its proximity to the single family area to the north. All utilities are available to the site, and Jefferson Avenue N.E. will be signalized later in the year. Continuing with the review, Mr. Blaylock stated the one story building will contain 10 washing bays for automobiles and one special bay for recreational vehicles: screening and landscaping has been provided to buffer the multiple family and single family residences to the north of the site. , JOHN S. WILSON SA-008-86 May 14, 1986 Page 2 The possibility of additional traffic and its impact on the neighborhood was discussed, and it is felt by the applicant that there should not be more than two persons waiting in line at the same time to utilize the car wash. • Access to the subject site is primarily from the southwest corner of the site, noise and glare to the surrounding residences is of concern due to the proposed hours of operation as well as the proposal for future use as a mini market and gasoline supplier. Mr. Blaylock stated the alternative to the noise and glare problem would be to eliminate the access to N.E. 4th Street, which in turn would restrict the functional use of the site and force more traffic onto N.E. 3rd Street. He continued with a review of staff comments with regard to access, compatability with adjacent structures, compliance with the Comprehensive Plan and traffic circulation. It was noted that a national traffic impact analysis was completed and from that study, peak hours were discussed as pertains to the traffic impacts and intrusion into the surrounding neighborhood. Concern was expressed by the Hearing Examiner as to the access to the north and its impacts. Mr. Blaylock recommended approval of the proposal with the condition that the western-most curb cut on N.E. Third Street be eliminated. The Examiner called for testimony in support of the application from the applicant or his representative. Wishing to speak was: John S. Wilson 14124 - 177th Avenue N.E. Redmond, Washington, 98052 Mr. Wilson entered exhibits 4 and 5 into the record and advised the most south-westerly access has been changed since the submittal of the original site plan, and a common driveway has been put in its place that would access both the car wash facility and possible future mini market. Mr. Wilson expressed his belief that the car wash would be difficult to set up without an access to the north due to the traffic impacts that would occur. He believes the new proposed intersection will help the entire area by directing the cars to, and through, the northern access. He said after 10:00 P.M. there is virtually no business at all so he doesn't feel the concerns over lights and glare to the surrounding neighbors are justified. Continuing, Mr. Wilson stated there is a 18 ft. wide lane for access in the new site plan which customers will use for access out of the site, and he has had the building moved 22 ft. to the north to provide for that additional access. At this point the Hearing Examiner stated he was concerned about the two access points for this property and stated he would like to have the new site plan reviewed by various city departments to get their comments on the various traffic and land use concerns. He suggested continuing the hearing for two weeks to receive further input from staff. A date of April 8, 1986 was set for the continued hearing. Calling for further testimony in support of, in opposition to, or comments from staff, there was no one else wishing to speak. The hearing closed at 10:00 A.M. On May 6, 1986 at 9:00 A.M. this hearing was again opened to review the new site plan and receive comments from the Traffic Engineering Department. Representing staff was Roger Blaylock, Zoning Administrator. He gave a brief review of the request pointing out the previous concerns expressed regarding access on N.E. 3rd or N.E. 4th and the possible intrusion into the surrounding residential area. He had no further comments at this time. Wishing to comment on behalf of the City of Renton, Traffic Engineering Department was: Gary Norris Traffic Engineer Mr. Norris presented Exhibit #6, and stated his department was asked to investigate the possibility of improving access to the site from N.E. 3rd to the extent they could minimize access off of N.E. 4th.. He said his department checked into several alternatives and came to the conclusion that left turn access off N.E. 3rd Street should be restricted. Motorists desiring to go north on N.E. 3rd or N.E. 4th should be directed to the N.E. 4th arterial. He feels in order to ensure safe access to N.E. 3rd, a deacceleration lane should be provided along N.E. 3rd for right-in and right-out lanes to the properties. In response to the Hearing Examiner's inquiry about possibly closing the access for N.E. 4th, Mr. Norris stated there is a joint effort between the City of Renton and King County to place a signal at the intersection of Jefferson and N.E. 3rd Street to promote left turn accessibility to the residential properties in the area. • , JOHN S. WILSON SA-008-86 May 14, 1986 Page 3 Mr. Blaylock stated he felt it would be possible to eliminate one of the two access points shown on N.E. 4th, possibly the one on the western-most portion of N.E. 4th as shown on the site plan. The Examiner called for further testimony in support of this project, there was no one wishing to speak. There was no one in opposition, and no further comments from staff. The hearing closed at 9:15 A.M. FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & DECISION: Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: 1. The applicant, John S. Wilson, has requested approval of a site plan for a self-service car wash on approximately .92.acres of property. 2. The application file containing the application, the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) documentation, the Building and Zoning Department Report, and other pertinent documents was entered in the record as Exhibit #1. 3. Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and SEPA (RCW 43.21C, 1971, as amended), a Declaration of Non-Significance has been issued for the subject proposal by the Environmental Review Committee (ERC), the responsible official. 4. Plans for the proposal have been reviewed by all City departments affected by the impact of this proposal. 5. There was no opposition to the subject proposal from any member of the public. 6. The subject site is located between N.E. 3rd Street and N.E. 4th Street, 135 ft west of Jefferson Avenue N.E. 7. The site was annexed into the City in June 1966 by the adoption of Ordinance 2249. The site was rezoned from the G zoning it received automatically upon annexation, to its current B-1 (Business/Commercial) classification by the adoption of Ordinance 2655 in August, 1971. 8. The map element of the Comprehensive Plan designates the area in which the subject site is located as suitable for the development of medium density multi-family uses, but does not mandate such development without consideration of other policies of the plan. 9. The subject site is part of a B-1 district which is located between the convergence of N.E. 3rd and N.E. 4th Streets. Part of this district contains Renton Housing Authority subsidized housing. This housing is west of the subject site. An L-1 district is located south and west of the site. 10. North of the site, north of N.E. 4th Street, is a large R-1 district. Single family homes in this district are located immediately north of the subject site. 11. N.E. 3rd Street is a major arterial. The intersection of N.E. 3rd and Jefferson will be controlled by a new traffic signal. N.E. 4th north of the site is a designated collector arterial. Traffic Engineering has recommended a minimization of curb cuts along N.E. 3rd to protect its arterial status. In addition, the site is located just west of the Jefferson intersection on a curving portion of N.E. 3rd which also makes access a sensitive issue. 12. The applicant proposes constructing a self-service car wash. The facility will comprise a 3.976 sq. ft. building containing 10 washing bays. Five vacuum islands, a vending island and 25 parking stalls to permit wipe down and drying will also be provided. 13. The facility is proposed to be available 24 hours per day, seven days per week. The Building Division indicated that this could have an adverse affect on the single family homes north of the site. • , JOHN S. WILSON , SA-008-86 May 14, 1986 Page 4 14. The applicant modified the plans in response to the analysis of the Building and Zoning Department. The plans now include one joint use driveway at the southeast corner of the subject site. The drive would be shared between the subject site and the easterly adjacent site, thereby minimizing the curb cuts along N.E. 3rd in this general vicinity. 15. The setback of 10 feet from 3rd would be landscaped, and there would be a larger landscaped triangle at the extreme southwest corner of the site. A similar triangle of landscaping will be located at the southern end of the building containing the wash bays. A landscaped planting area would be located along the north half of the western property line adjacent to the apartment complex. A 6 ft. high fence would also be included in this area. 16. Two driveways would be located along N.E. 4th, separated by a landscaped area approximately 25 feet deep. The driveways would be opposite single family homes across N.E. 4th. Staff remains concerned that the through access of this site could lead cars to use the site to circumvent the traffic controls at Jefferson and Edmonds. The northern ,and southern driveways could provide a through route avoiding the controlled intersections. 17. The building would be a one story brick building with a mansard roof. The 10 bays and equipment room would be located within this relatively open structure. Immediately east of the bays, and servicing the bays will be 5 vacuum islands arranged to serve two wash bays each. A parking area to allow hand drying of the washed cars will be located along the western property line. Parking for 25 cars will be provided. CONCLUSIONS 1. The subject site's location, requires sensitive design. While site plan approval was not ordinarily required for the site's B-1 district, during the rezone stage the City Council believed that the location of single family homes north of the site required special consideration. The site itself is sandwiched between single family homes on the north and a major arterial, N.E. 3rd, on the south. The site probably represents an example of one of the worst transition zones in the City. There is nothing to buffer the single family homes north of the site and traffic conditions along N.E. 3rd warrant, at least from the Traffic Engineering perspective, that vehicles be directed and encouraged to exit the site toward those single family homes. Understandably, the applicant desires to create a viable business, but at the same time the applicant must understand that single family homes north of the site and the multi-family apartment complex west of the site are entitled to reasonable protections. A twenty-four hour business in this location does not appear justified, and it would appear that restrictions on operating times would not unreasonably deny the applicant reasonable use or return on the site. 2. Therefore, the facility shall not be permitted to operate 24 hours per day. While use of the car wash may be minimal during the late night and early morning hours, the location is not well suited to even possible 24-hour a day operation. Single family homes are directly north of the site and an apartment complex is located west of the northerly half of the site. Both residential areas'would be subject to car headlights, advertising signs, glare and automobile engine noise. Cars, even a few entering and leaving the subject -site through the north driveways, can have a disturbing affect on single family residents. Car headlights and engine noise will be directed toward these homes. Similarly, night use will affect the apartments located due west of the site. Headlights and engine noise will be projected through the bays toward the apartments. The buffering provided will screen the actual operation, but cannot screen the noise and headlight glare of cars using the northerly driveways. While the operation will generally be unattended, and the washing bays may be open, this Office believes the applicant can install some kind of timing device to close the operation between the hours of 10 PM and 7 AM. 3. There appears to be little if any justification, or community need for a 24-hour self-service car wash. A balancing of interests weighs in favor of a neighborhood both zoned for single family uses and designated in the Comprehensive Plan for single family homes. The apartment complex is entitled to a similar treatment. That apartment site, and even the subject site, is designated for medium density multi-family uses. ' , JOHN S. WILSON SA-008-86 May 14, 1986 Page 5 A car wash, no matter how well designed, will be an intrusion into the adjoining residential areas. Residential zoning entails the right to quiet enjoyment, and if " not much else, that designation should carry with it quiet enjoyment during the late evening and early morning hours. 4. The Comprehensive Plan requires preservation of residential values,and segregation of different intensities of land uses. Preservation of residential 'values can't be accomplished by permitting commercial self-service car washes across the street or on an adjacent lot without offering not only buffers but some limitations on operations. Even then, this Office would prefer to close the northerly driveways, but Traffic Engineering indicates this would have a negative affect on N.E. 3rd in this location. 5. At this juncture this Office will defer to the recommendation of the Traffic Engineering Division that the northerly drives are necessary to minimize traffic conflicts along N.E. 3rd, but the site plan will be conditioned so that the applicant is on notice that the City maintains the right to restrict access along the north property line if such access should either interfere with the residential nature of the area, or the property is utilized as a defacto alternative link between N.E. 4th and N.E. 3rd, permitting drivers to avoid signals at either Jefferson or Edmonds. 6. Similarly, restrictions on left turns to or from the site may be imposed by the City if safety considerations indicate such limitations are necessary. Such restrictions for access along Rainier Avenue have been imposed to provide for safe and limited access where traffic conditions warrant and this location along N.E. 3rd may warrant similar measures. 7. Traffic Engineering has recommended an acceleration/deceleration lane adjacent to the site and this shall be required. DECISION The Site Plan is approved subject to the following conditions: 1. The car wash shall be closed and all operations curtailed between the hours of 10 P.M. to 7 A.M. The applicant may utilize timing devices to accomplish this objective. 2. One, or both of the northern driveways may be closed by the .City if in its discretion those driveways have an adverse or deleterious affect on;the residential community north of the subject site.. 3. The City, in its sole discretion, may restrict left turns to or from. the site from N.E. 3rd. 4. The applicant shall have to provide an acceleration/deceleration lane subject to the approval of the Traffic Engineering Division. ORDERED THIS lath day of May, 1986. /C-v/FRED J. KAUF AN HEARING EX INER TRANSMITTED THIS lq;.th day.of May, 1986 to the parties of record: John S. Wilson 14124 - 177th Avenue N.E. Redmond, Washington, 98052 Gary Norris Traffic Engineer City of Renton ' ' JOHN S. WILSON \, . SA-008-86 May 14. 1986 Page 6 TRANSMITTED THIS 1,Ath day of May, 1986 to the following: Mayor Barbara Y. Shinpoch Councilman Richard M. Stredicke Richard Houghton, Public Works Director Larry M. Springer, Policy Development Director Members, Renton Planning Commission Ronald Nelson, Building & Zoning Director Glen Gordon. Fire Marshal Roger Blaylock, Zoning Administrator Lawrence J. Warren. City Attorney Renton Record-Chronicle Pursuant to Title IV. Section 3015 of the City's Code. request for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before May 28, 1986. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is based on erroneous procedure. errors of law or fact. error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for review by the Examiner within fourteen (14) days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific errors relied upon by such appellant, and the Examiner may. after review of the record. take further action as he deems proper. An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Section 3016, which requires that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk. accompanying a filing fee of $75.00 and meeting other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection or purchase in the Finance Department, first floor of City Hall. The Appearance of Fairness Doctrine provides that no ex parte (private one-on-one) communications may occur concerning land use decisions. This means that parties to a land use decision may not communicate in private with any decision-maker concerning the proposal. Decision-makers in the land use process include both the Hearing Examiner and members of the City Council. All communications concerning the proposal must be made in public. This permits all interested parties to know the contents of the communication and would allow them to openly rebut the evidence. Any violation of this doctrine would result in the invalidation of the request by the Court. The Doctrine applies not only to the initial public hearing but to all Requests for Reconsideration as well as Appeals to the City Council. For purposes of these decisions and recommendations the terms "Should" and "Shall" are to be considered mandatory. The term "May" will be considered discretionary. When the report is a recommendation to the City Council the terms "should" and "shall" are intended to inform the City Council that if they approve the recommendation the items should be mandatory to preserve the intent of the decision. .' 11%11 t•i!..V...):e'r4 ii, : ,. ..v•. ..\ ... \ 1 • GA(_tF IC CAE '" imr r _ • •p�is, AJ ,• r.. �' G �_,1 I.1 1• •'. 71 1.: I rout inizv I 0 Ir • A rri ,1• "":• :. -..,••••-(r;••*. ''..* '.• . .; ...6• •.: ,,-;:ii,(,;f,s:::,...:!, -.r,, \w... . —•:`i � a al n T 1 I•t�''m��.��reeli r .. • .to .. .-'f'/•S5. „�•:_ ,,•.',°;. ..� it 77- i -_ij �-yl y q : // .i, �``.J �j J+..__ wiNosOR L1„5 � iiri.'+^:!-- r- t,', ' : L •1 6•- , , /.;•,,,, , F., _.„.. , . . . • . ,..,L; ,1 ---!,, , R-4 G-1 • �••,:,•:. ` .,_.;• ,,f .."� ,) \- �'� , cis a . :r.2 _c r, f' . . ,i L-1 Snit , • /t :, i s L ^:�a / . /. ,• -•\\\ \`� ( —7,,. '' . 1 iori. a • 1^ n • : 1 —'' s �ji . \ � • •• l.•OLL E: I 1 t •I. P•. A( 7, \ 1 n •.J! ,3• m CEAI:'fR+ r a :EDAR RIVER�., \ �. • +�/ - I `b. ' /(-•\`. , ' —• . H 1 G-1 - \. t' • • M..•7 ` t 1 R 1,° '— �1 1 .-... , .• , ,r - • ',.•.•. N, , . .. , .. , . .. ,!...„,_, ' • 1 •- ,, t �\ , ,, an`,• • R-2 N „-•' . C' p •. — - T~+ z. 1 t .:yL` .0 1 111 1 I 1 27 • i tt, `•' JOHN S. WILSON SA-008-86 • • • APPL I CANT JOHN S. WILSON TOTAL AREA - .92ACRE PRINCIPAL ACCESS N.E. 3RD ST AND N.E. 4TH ST EXISTING ZONING B-1, BUSINESS USE EXISTING USE UNDEVELOPED PROPERTY PROPOSED USE CAR WASH FACILITY • COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN - MEDIUM DENSITY MULTI-FAMILY COMMENTS • f�'S.:T.-.�ii^ir`i!%tii :b•".{`,l^rtZ:Y�"1E. s Si •Gkif •3 ,,c- »;• ':-' �t--", yg ,a r,iiv k'-� { .. ''`' ' !._ tt ..,•. r :'_1=,,::P--. -,..J ,'/;, z.L�rtF 4,1 ,}X ti • t. ,ik" ,• ;%*•; n{ : 4 ♦ .,;? it 6'�•5 4^ r ,! e` ! • 'Ta sv c .4 a r•, r l �v ;,s. Y� ; -;.i:i y. .,c 6•t„,gt i:•.t �r.':r r _ - ,,,� ,4 • ,, ; r di' • li.. 1 s. 'yam '4_�'" `S .y,rv. r't1.!., 5d;,•h r) .,-, i3E:6:6 .ii'i,sr..a;:'- 'MV,• •is S�1;i..i. ,+ i .,i .,t..;- `.'' ` i i `%s•tT.lrx, .,";:.''7,g• i� ,!!'�;:��;�-'�`,t.' ��' j;`<,�,`l. ;u')', i,ii' 4 v� 7�='<'�, ' .` r€�.`:" }- $ t ti ='-`� fi���•".,�+•-arE�L�'.7A•.+.��dio•w- - F�•. 1'r � •'l'` ,,(��4 � �".� • f�,i.�:yP�`.%r�• ��':�Ct�3i. '';/ ,•�1C 1�:, � � +.`479•r.'•%�,��.�}„� 4�'*.�-�1'RKi '_,,• 1'r� Nf '�o?i�k� 1 -tY$ ,, :, i� :f ''�' Z' Y,i �/` ,�''�'`'�:a i�'� %:.: - �W._�'} t'p".. t• • -- - t •g,- t-•? •F %-yx '''+;;, .t' S,,:7 . .,7 B .,.i.'•;-ID ..t:r" �t :'I„ ', i,.. f�, :"."�' _.x. ;:�•i. •; 1.m -r4s `R. ,F'•st .; ->,+,�y,J. ... trk,.,�f . 'bM ? , .. •••'. gN'_;• r •,�^ :•:: !R _.• :1-,•. ,.\' ,.'i: 1"::_•41'„; 7: � �- '.Fqf�'" J' ':•4 ,4<t.� a ,.iY�.'d-. �' N '. � +yy:, e,� 'n:-• .,A, s'' �4 .A `4:^'' ..�.t,-, i a- "+i - .yt:7;d v _-.7r• ip'_ `rti r.,?,•1 wt.•.-•.•-•�' .. r�'.14 %t.. ;,F:,'' ,",'4 ,r.,:';r '1:.`<> A q} •t, ,{• .. h ,.s., '+oC •f�1= '+ "'y��� tl(,,�J,t,r/,'c •.i f�'.'h. ,c: >I'S3r'�`�, Y. nr. � ..y�.1,i7 •7,:.-yj^ ', }+ F�'- •"ter' � ... a�;d i -,' ',Pr, i J1s' fit•.;.,...','i. 7. A•,- ,o, r' =r•• v. ,t-k-tiS:'=..a :i,: - \ 4. ;�.�Y�,e, r��,r-' rNP -+ 't. ,. kru`-'�s. ` ,, �,�^,E\a. -k.r-•3.A �- •� ,r"r• `�`'' •'�.+ p. • •r'� rl`g;.e -e ^,,5, p¢ 2•�•.. >.tf+ .✓..�'. •1'• LY J J h�.y.,, +, Y'4.' -t ., �arS1{i1 \ •'`` ♦ - • C , `--_ii-s-1 .a • • t v w•.y- r - �! \ },C„ �..i-�- N. •.• ! y e. `� :. • b ar•�;7.} ``• ♦ fi \ y':. \ • -Aft „ I . � , $3 t \ \ ; ,i - - --- - . .• \77-\\ ‘\ \ s .‘ —.7 I. i 1/ ♦ `' is S :. 11 41 .\ P' \ • �� • ,• i i L • 1E �1 'per, j%;'' •, \' \ . I/ �X r 1`�d i • i • i` V. �di,• -2 It ••••••••• . .. t Li a \ \ ,... ei/ 1 _ ....! • 3'. .!......... ". . . i • d.1 r . + . >..1; .- 1 • ••:/, ••-• . \ ...., ,, •0:-r. 11 C2.- , ' , ., ..:i�7 , , " ...,.... • , 1 • f Q d, : : : : •-J l f f` n 'i CSC ih1 .2 :tLi5; t�\ • a �q 1 py I (1- ''JO-. • \ \ • • .14 .. . , t�� R i' .n ,./' I t••••.). ��'�1 . C�_US C , 1)• ,3'�. s9a•�gc • � •..' ..i::::•::::,::::,:;:i:i: , " :::•:: I I I I • • ail,'.:*:::::,:i::::' Nil •••••:.:' r'l -- ' _ . • .• FP" Aright ''.. il."0 . • ...............-...::..,.4.q,m:.E:.p.gi :•::!.-.::., • .1._ LAND E ELEMENT • . ..,,i•K:,...:::::::,,,.... ,.......i ::::::::: • .: :.:..„...". Nem 111111110110 ••::;:::: • . ! ii.:17' •%, "al 1:111::::1 i:i:•:::i:i I ‘',' 4.. 11111111•0•11:::X: Single Family Commercial , , 4 , . .. , . ,, , • • J.,. wi .:.:.......„.... . .......................: LOW Density N -....•:;:i:i:i*i:::::i: mily Office / Office Pat • :,::::::::::::•::::::: Multl-Fa \ . • / in ".-I •'' k • •0000000000000o • aiiii.ii.:::.iiii.ii.i:.i.:.;.i Medium Density ,.,ci.),..,..• : ....9,0.00.0%.• Public/Ouasi-Publ "n, f"..? :3 • ••••••••••••• .......,.............. "••••"•""•............. Multi-Family .c.00.c.o. 0....... . • •, .• ,s• ' • . - 1, T. ..........t, '•Wd• ";f'•; :: Mt'-V.iia High Density Light Industrial PIK -- •-•..- ,...4%..4,.....-it-,-t,.::-....,:ry.;,.,...q. ,:,.. ;,,,i.„,.:i.-w,i,x4:::, cf. •..-. ....,,-..:%.-..,,,ze4.--•,.: ,.• ..kow.gN Multi-Family ' , illit'll -;N::::, i7.0*.;:...*.e.,•:,...;.... ,. , ti..iii i.2.1.1te . .,•,:t..te.:::::.:?,•;,„:.%:(5:::::4. •••,i,.....ce.-T .. „_,....„.... ,....,. • . • • le •n.••!..•-•'-'.! ‘•0..:• iv 4 nce.". - •111111111 1_11,, c'1:7'..•%&•tie : t • Recreation e•°•'• Heavy Industrial . .!"1, Pga - ; . i..•, • • • '"...g5:::•;-....: . '1''. • . k '\4106.M • . .•11V.1 . , 0.1 . ::;:,,-,„-..,..,.: Greenbelt ----.----------"::' Manufacturing Pa /3-,•0•-00 '.%•-Z••,..,.0..,..r.,•..w....-tv%,,,._•tP'•,__•,3(,,..•3 O.,)_:0'.q ••.0.,,_,7 ,.....•:.. . ..., (.v.•.. ,' iimm.,-„.i3O-,A-0,-,r•o.-.-°m0.,00,(,:,, ,w.i.:::::r:e:1•-g:.g.:::r.:a•:l.r,Io•,J:o-i:.:..;ri:,.ir.r•,.!..:.0-.t :.. -:N..•.,-, .i.k ro1 1.1.•.'1 ••• ',:m1". 1Il, o•q.l•nul iiAIii i'iIilii•i Sri}.ii•i m I;it•i•::l.:i.,a.g.ii.;.,.:,.i:..:i.g.f:..,..:iii.:r:1..•i•iw-z16s_11 w mi_*a"-•1s7:•i•%s 4 1/1 i.t '.:,•N.•.•.•''.•i-0•...6o.o.• .1.•-a ,A-4•,,Mpo,n0,,0%;. •.,,'-.",6.u.... -•'l. ,• t i..! p..,•,..•:-.,le Optic III li • K Ii 1 .eti I . ';'::..... 1:::::::::::• re :Pitt " EMI :::::;::::::: .• .!..... a .00000000 00000000 P...::••..•• • • • • - •• - '. ' '::•:*':i:.:.:::::::::ri!!!!',tiiiii1:*:.*•:::: ,/11111;r44;IR:: 111111111 • 000000 •00000• '.6,..a> 0 0 0 • • • i•.•:• .. ::::.1 •rgigiii ":::i*i:i: .R0 • . ! . 000000 .. : 0 • 0 0 0 • • •',. '..:•:•:•:•: "gip 0 j i ,:::.:i., '....,....1.11P A Ili re . II li el 111•00000000.0u• o•00 00 0 •.•0*e•.0'......... giiii I, ti:::. ..:Ap.4:)4177411 lam r, ntJ, , • • • • • - • • • a ..••, *s.::.*::::i: . -- ::::::.x.f..../Arir•-... • • o o o • • o 16 • • •.. im:::: L..-J • • • • • o o • s, c• N Ma i y. • ,, „„„„:.,. _ _. . • . . . . • 0 . • :,. ..:.:.:. ,, ,E,::; .... O 00000 , 00 , ;, , •i** ••••-. ...,......... .. .e... o oo4 ... 0 • 0 , 0 • l• 0 0 •,'; , 11111511 . 11 1- 0.o0-0000.00000000 0 0 ,.. o 9 o o o • e • o o ...k. 1 ell 16VcW 00000.000o . ... o o o • - 19. 9. e. •• : , .. , .0000 oil ...;: . O 00 • • • • • • • *.t.. •:•::••:•:-:•:•:•. -: o • • • 0 • 0000J.„. k it ax"I i3-0.11111t. Mill ...::::::::::::::::::::,:::.- ....... 11111• • • • o • eoo ••• \ •••.•.....•....• .... .......••........ -- oeooe • -•..... , •••••• ••••• , .• ,... •,:, - ; i o o.o6o.bee" .`•"•-• • 411,1Va I :.1111111IIII ....::::::::::.. ..:::::.:iii:iiial.4 ::::.......... • i:•::::::' ::ii;i;Mieiiii0. i.:?:i.iia::ii... - • • o e o 4'... \!.r•e)o•ii ,• . 0 ,.,! ilik AAP I. . ...MIEN ill •"" •••' • . 0 • 0 0 • '• .1 \ :i,..:!i:. . "'-`11--. ,°•°o°,9,* ..!..;... ,,t woo 44 ... pIIIIIIImIIII iisw, \NNK\ . . 41i1,-, ..,-.).. !.thi, • 0 0 , • /./.. V.,. :! • 1,1•••• i:::'•i.:l4tes 0 •• 0,....0 9 •/...'" ill Nib •0...• :,,,:,:,:,:,:,:,:,:,...,:,::::::::,:, :, :.,,:,,,,...,. ......_....4:- i; . .• 6 t P••76t1 '.46'. ..°0-'.'o. ......•••••••”•,......... iiii•oill' --1 •..?•,0.,0 •••••:•:........x.:•:•:.:.x.:•:.:.:•:.... .1 i I••:::::::::•:. :::::1 'Hi o •Ike o 9. I: .. 6, 0..........• .:::.:.:.:.:::.;.:::::,...:.i.:.i.:,.:„. .::::' 11 ii 1 0 4• a 9 if• ,0110.4111hv ' coir°••••0°093°.• ::..if..::.:.:?:.:.:i.:*:......:i..f.:* tr....1 1 .*.L ;:..ii.:::.: i'.:Mi -- - -- ...... ::•::::::::::::::: '611:' '-16.5bilid^44-1164.11-4.,0•• All Stb '; --' 4-,..:::.:70.":7::•••••:- . e L;ii:17=7":700• 11111.....1111.1119::1 .::;:i nclimeee, ::::::::::.::.*:::MT iiiiiiii 4. •',. '.:.:.,••••••:.:.:.:::::::::::::::.:.•• .•60 ..gz7...1-..)0000000000. I ""•."''.- • - :*:.::::iff.i' ••••110111/ 11111111011iiiiiitl.°Ale: Igr/1.: :ks'-. 'ili2:::Mi::•::::".-..:.:.::::::.: .°°00:00°09:%)....04:00°070°:°:?. ' ........711 ..' .:it ni.i.ig i:.:•:.::: :..ciiiim.:.::i mi --- ... ...............,....................... .... %,....,.- --,,,,,,,.....,. i:.-. ... ..Nri'.ell'• ....Niiit.,,,i0 '' ..: .:-:::......:.::::.:figiiii. vovocacav:0°09)%voxoovi. 0:::.:A;::. :.L__. ..::::::::...::::::::,.:::::::::,.....,...:.:.:.. ' m...iiip,..-„,-.., grok,,,„„- .„. .....::::::::::::::....:0: 0.0.00.0.•00_0_0_0_0_0_0_0_0.. ,...1 ..:,.......:.:....... .........,::::::::::,.................. ;;;; .-,..,g, A'Ili - ,- .... , .', r.,. .::.i.i:::gi:g:ii:iiili]iNi::: .0V°0°00°00°00°00°0•:00°00°0°00:00u00u00°909300. i..•::....:.:. .0'0°00' '''''''''. . . ' ••• _s...,‘.....!' .ittp ,-•''. . •:.:inig:.iiimi: •40000000000000•00000000000000000000. rz,;i...i.:..••o ... . II 4,,,ktil., 14 a men PPM!) 1 al tau 1 . ,. .. it -•• •• ::::::::::::::::: 0000,,0000,,00..00_0_0_0_. t,.........3............ •,• ,._Sotsyrtow!`) T, 11. li ....;.°00:00'• I: IiiiIiiiiiifimm ...ca°00000000.0.0.0.009§6°09,00000.0. I i :::::.:::::•:•:• • Ai Ili? c i - d'• . 0000c.c.c..000..,, ,,c.0., , ....................: 0.1 I ..... ._ 1/\ .o0o0o0o0o0.. .: •iii:::Mig:ii:i::::•:,,...-• ,..o0o0o0o0o0o0o0o0o. ,I s.........f................: ! ',:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•. ',I •00000000 .i... ...... •••••••••••.• •.1: pafoc:0%,!•:.°030c.. ,. t:-.* .f&;•/ ' .....„. te .L 1 ....RN. , :.:i.,.ii:iiii.moi: .00.00000.000.0.00.. ..... ......:::::•,.......:::::::: •••,,,• ,121•••.., .rn. ., ...k:.,„qv*: . ,.., .,.„...,•,„:.. •:, ::::::::::i*:;:.,..si:::: ...., ....0,00000.000000. 4.,. :..:........• ..:.:.:. •,,.... . _, . i: :.i:::i.::ii:ii:::i ••...• ..,i-,! •::::::::::::.:i....::x . - • Il.••.• .-...... ••4" . • N.... 1 1,, • . 1.- 1 • :•:•:•:44•:•:•:•:•:•:. • Pr,; J• .... • Pe7, •., .............•-•••••• .... 41112:11ill,61,.:gti...../..4.1,) 0 •,.;r0.)::::::::!..:',...::„...,jir:.5N41.1.J:;.,;0'.2..?.....,;:•:.% ..;•;•:,;it.?•70'),.• •.::•:::•:::::•:::•:.:;....::.:::::::::::: ....iiik ti. or:oe'' •; 7:. 1 altrit.4 '1:1,1'.1.1., i'..;.S:ciPcr.t...a..,,,i!hN.V.,,??;.i •4,ii...',,i,'?e,fi.11;,e.%,''ojay;life.: :;;X.(;:d•?`A, ::?::':::::::::::gf: ilIV ':"'"f.. ..&?" 1 .ari ' it 114.2,;111 !.1 . •N•s-a.-• .. 'r..- •(.1 ti . •• •••• '4. J n V?..). . • •.1 a••..7 r i•-p•t •....•••••••• '. ...s!;''. .:117.1"ri'Vg ii&l."4•L'.:).):'1•:>.:P•••••,,..,.9-ri" • ''''',..e.','t• ••.6 Vn;c•'-';:„ ..•••••• . ..:t, .,, , . `..:•:.:•.,:••• '''aNC-r,(. q. - ...'1'-4:8.`.P:...... ''..3-171;1.• '.'4' , ej,:,41.:::i•„.c.' . .,... . 117 . ..e. .. .,...• ..f•.•1-,ye).,,- -:.7. ; ; -•••‘.••••...1..:,;,;,•••• ••:,71•,1•Pl., '1:::::. °'••0: - '.• iwoolotribk, -1,..0. .. t, Iciso• •••,.:?.......•:,,,,:c•43,1:,J. • 1111 !.::•:..ici 1 ..exami4... ''t•:'"cri-., .9. - .,. Ntitli..-":" §a1441:s, 44' ' '11111111r9101 '''..?• e'rk•' ' i.ti• •,•••-• (-• 4:Lt.'', • ' ,.0•••!.;•.••„..5,,..„ „A• , - •ta,'• . tr ':(91.k• r,,..,,•,,,...,,,..,, : - t ! 0 A .I) .1 •••••I:4 i''' •'c,•',",„0,:9.ce: • e• • r Th.. • t :4- N ,,, \ .„f. ••••,/,...„,., •..c....,,,,°,,•,..'•0.k45.,, •. \ - 41111Alt c...c.....4cocp•o•y; • :•., :•, - VII •• 6:.)a ,.. .;,Lato..to....e .).051.;•....'....•11)*t • ' .4.------ , •et-ar s--tv r :,..<ccoi,... _...__ ._. .i.%• ,; III..,..06.....0... 'v.;iill):61-1},•02:*',.clorp::::”.i1:. ??,...•-- .___ -,. ..i,erver • .-.• .. s•t.,q,•,*-1 ).-?,..:1,-:-.;5'6; • ,00000., • .0.0 ?..,••°°.°. c, ,...-,.,,„.,?, ....,, •,.,, ,(4...- ....,\....<...ft;0 r•*,,....;04 .::.,.,, ,,fret...C.11,4J,•.! •••.1 er% •'"I er , +- . .A./ •• ‘ ...ei)..i!?:::3.:ri::.;:biv.9,e„c•;,-1•1:$4;;-4.,;':4.,, !.0,.,•s- .; ....•••,-. -.,-.s •„La.:,s4,r44569 .•.,.,,•••1,., •.,.... ,,..1:•,••••••••.:..,.• , "•!••••:0•Ist:•i'rel•coa..;,•tA•••••;1'.0t,,l,,qb.,.:: ••,,,....Xe. f•• . -,*. • ...K..ipl'At4F1•TX.I.•V . '.' 2 r:/..''''',..,J.• ••..i•.../''...61::•:..1. , ,I... Il ..„..2C.i.,'„, . ::,;;;;.f.N., ..:!W•;,:,;.•.,i.q.'"Z,..:,q...-iT,',0 :1'c,,.;,•:„.f,,;II,/ ..',;','..,..p.;b‘,, ' ''f .. . . ,-'•,; l':,:-.;?:.ii:.`;;;,,...';..-e:r•.:,17--',:•;;;;7,Tcs.•:kt• ,.,.0:'••...'PA•t?,,ie.";(3,cl:(1„1.1;;P,.,..;u Kr,VW's,...f•"•%,,b)te's•t'i.L.3:::` .• :•:•::::,... t•.tiz.,•„.t.•,....,,,.:•..,;.•,...4.%..... . .......:v_...11' !,..41.12 t) •!)•4)„Pt)veLti;W.ri,Ti,4.P!..1:1..•t;.+.• ‘, -. •-`...-.':,......".1 .., - ,v- -, 0 fa.i•0.1,0....,oto•;An...ri,:I I,'..r4.0,f!:d.N,,.ti,„...:,...0,.,...e4.• , -.,:• „, ',.i...e.'•:. '.--t a• ". : . '.•:;.ig:.Y::•iii•::i:i:i::•: . sci.,...0.5,...-,..,1..'..1,•,-,:,,q, -1,1;.to •• til!rtirii•i" i."i'l•t"..ii.:?..sill(r.a.f.,,t.,A 1: •" °' - ••••• ••••:,C•rilr?i,Ilifkle'., ,-;..•1•;i.,.::',.;‘, 0 ..:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::1w,•:...,:,:,:.:•.:,:.,, ..). ",, no„%,0,0: ••••.,..•e- -.. • ' • ..t.,-•0,•,,,,":•4,1 a: ' . • •::•:::.:•:-:,:::::::*:::::::::::: . ,;-..-e.f?,:.,') ••'-. C ••-0-01$.0-0 0 .••..1.( .•:•:•'•:•X4:•••••%••••• ••CV'C.)••••.•••1:4. 1 .,'' Ve10.441.0.5(t).ri.V01:1•ertic5. :: :::::::':*::::::::::::::::::::::::' ••:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:••... •,:i • ..")..) •iv • ' :•::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::•:..„••‘•07:•,..t,; ...,, 4. '-----..:re.....0'e:tv.rev,. 1,e44 . ...•.r.•••.:•_:,::::::_:::i*: .4.:...ii:•...3.;,;•ikitt tvio.:‘, eefoji •. ---________ •4,,c-14,•:,,,•?('- ,.,...:,0..., :p. ;,...,•;q• • !*,,..x?.., .09,00. ,!,„ . 0,0000,. / ............ " ..0.....4, , •.••• ••• :,,,k,. ., . .____`;if l• :::•:.(••, 0°0 0• 41•• • •,,• ::::::MaiR.ME :..r •;• •%..• •••• •.`iVA . A a ..,. .. h .... ....,..„,,..:::.....,..,..,..,..,..,..,...„......,„.....,,,......''''"-dm° 'ro/46...c:AI;00:00.:0:3r..,,(, ', t • 3 ' ' - • .ei.ti%Ve'D:t•• 0.'I;• • -'•.•.• ..i•.%S..4. • ...."la .•.,.0 4.7..........* •0.%,•-• ••••1•)f,,s, -'" ; i :•%:-::::K:•:::::.:.:::: :. .*•• 'tits:.:.:'•::::.:!,'. Alli ..1. . 0 , itill%:04,...:00c,...,. 3 Q. .:.:.:.:.:.:.:..•,,, \ I •, .0• ••,./ 0.• •00.• i4,-.(ys,.../..7:„.14-......,. - ..„-..c..cv,:.,?,..„,.., .,..9 c•i'•if.: ,. A q.111l0.1..T.r.Zile.:3,01..;ikr,c1" • '1'.`)C" :"."....,, ,,,,;,t1•;.... •::••••• , .•so....4. . (.1 .- . ,,.. .. • ..• •• ,..., • ..,,.. 1 :‘,,i,,..)‘•cie....,,,•,,)•5.:.,, ',c..• •,• ••‘...;,-, ' ......:•.4% A..,... 'j P4,-.•IIVIN '.l.....P....l•••Al '? •..6..03 b.1••• ••• • .,0.k.' c. ....,4,4.••09:::0010....!•.../n4yr.i.Z.e41-4.%•;.11,`.v.a.:•..1%,•";i3i!...t.i •IN.'• 'gi t'' * .4.‘".. .r•-•,t '%%To%- poo,p0000c., i nit• .1...•or.....•4PJ 'C..;•;1 1 NL.•.,'A")-,,i.i.;, •0 ';•,',.iSt;''.vr:.,...r, t.T. 11•''''' ‘.N•i•,•• i....'.: 0 /,„,., e , ,..ra(1,..,..•,. .•:...CM` ..'../7'* . 4. :41,,i . •, ... .. ! '•:.%••1•0'.0.14..:1•!_t2r3-•••:i -.4.....1,-,•. .•.••••,...J•. ..,4,.) 2328Z BUILDING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT SUPPLIMENTAL REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING MARCH 25, 1986 AND APRIL 8, 1986 APPLICANT: JOHN S. WILSON FILE NUMBER: SA-008-86 A. SUMMARY & PURPOSE OF REQUEST: The applicant seeks site plan approval to build a self-service car wash facility consisting of a 3,976 square foot building with 10 washing bays, 5 vacuum islands, 1 vending island and 25 parking stalls. B. SUPPLIMENTAL ANALYSIS: The Building and Zoning, the Policy Development, the Police, the Fire and the Public Works Departments meet together to discuss the design issues raised by the inquiry of the Hearing Examiner to address the apparent problems of land use impacts and access to the subject site that is located between N.E. 3rd and N.E. 4th Streets just west of Jefferson Avenue. These departments present the following facts, conclusions and recommendation for the Hearing Examiners review: 1. The design problem was balancing the problem of access with the issue of impacts upon the adjacent single family residential neighborhood to the north. 2. N.E. 3rd Street is designated as a major arterial on the Comprehensive Plan and carries some of the highest volumes of traffic in the entire city. The city has unutilized public right-of-way on N.E. 3rd Street adjacent to the subject site. 3. N.E. 4th Street is designated as a Collector Arterial on the Comprehensive Plan and it carries more intense traffic than a typical single__family street because it services multiple family residential developments to the west and is the location of primary bus route access to the general area. A bus lane is located on N.E. 4th Street along the northern property line of the subject site and would have to be relocated if access was allowed to N.E. 4th Street. 4. Three single family residences could be impacted by allowing access to N.E. 4th Street. Most of the single family residential neighborhood to the north of the subject site faces onto more typical residential streets with much lower existing traffic volumes. 5. Preservation of the character of the single family neighborhood to the north has been a critical land use issue in the past. In the case of RVTI special buffering and limited emergency access was allow to maintain the neighborhood's integrity. 6. The interface of land uses along N.E. 4th Street is different from the interface on Jefferson Ave. N.E. as proposed in the Comprehensive Plan. Jefferson Ave. N.E. is definately a residential street constructed at less than 35 feet in width. N.E. 4th Street is constructed at 47 feet in width and is planned to function as a collector arterial. • Supplimental Staff Report • John S. Wilson, SA-008-86 April 4, 1986 page 2 7. The staff believes that the life safety issues of a non-hazzardous access from N.E. 3rd Street and adequate emergency access must overrule any consideration of mitigation of land use impacts. 8. The adjacent commercial site located to the west of the subject site that fronts on N.E. 3rd Street also has a major access problem. CONCLUSIONS: 1. The staff concluded that one option might be available that could address both problems. Could a redesign of possible access on N.E. 3rd Street be accomplished, while reducing or eliminating the impact of the proposed commercial on-site activities upon the single family residential area to the north? With the excess public right-of-way available primary access to the site could be developed by the construction of a center left turn lane. Deceleration and acceleration lanes would also be necessary. 2. The refocusing of access onto N.E. 3rd Street meant that the northern property line could be landscape and access prohibited except for emergency access at the northeastern corner of the site. 3. On-site circulation would function and allow the the access in the southwest corner of the site to be re-established. This access could then utilized the proposed center left turn lane. 4. Extension of the center left turn lane from the intersection of N.E. 3rd Street and Jefferson Avenue N.E. to the west would then allow the adjacent property owner to the west the opportunity of further extending it ' and provide a design solution to a known future development problem. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Combined City staff recommends that the Hearing Examiner require the construction of a center left turn lane along with the elimination of access except for emergency access to N.E. 4th Street from the subject site. The Examiner should also find the ERC in error as it relates to elimination of the southwestern access onto N.E. 3rd Street based on the fact that safe access will be provided with the center left turn lane. - OF R4,A �� ® z PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT RICHARD C. HOUGHTON • DIRECTOR NIL MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE.SO. RENTON,WASH.98055 94 206 235-2569 9.4TED SEP1c e BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH April 7, 1986 MAYOR MEMORANDUM TO: Fred Kauffman, Hearing Examiner FROM: Gary Norris, Traffic Engineering John Wilson, Applicant SUBJECT: National Pride Car Wash Hearing Schedule for April 8, 1986 ECF 008-86 and SA=007-86 Based upon our joint desire to develope additional roadway improvement and land- scape buffer plans. We would like to request a continuation of the Hearing on National Pride Car,Wash scheduled for April 8, 1986 to May 6, 1986. RECEIVED APR 7 1986 ary CITY OF RENTON _ \�, '�, HEARING EXAMINER ",'� John ' lson :jw OF 1 A. •, =, ; O THE CITY OF RENTON V to r,��r1 z ,01-+4 _..1�4+ MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 n + * ;yy BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR © LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER FRED J. KAUFMAN. 235-2593 94,�D SEP1E���P MEMORANDUM DATE: April 2, 1986 TO: GARY NORRIS, TRAFFIC ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT FROM: FRED KAUFMAN, HEARING EXAMINER SUBJECT: John Wilson/National Pride Car Wash Gary: I would appreciate your attending the continued hearing on April 8, 1986 in order to answer specific traffic engineering questions regarding access to and from the subject site and to explore possible alternatives. Thank you. • MEMORANDUM DATE: March 27, 1986 TO: Fred Kaufman, Hearing Examiner FROM: Gary Norris, Traffic Engineer SUBJECT: John S. Wilson National Pride Car Wash SA-o08-86 I have met with Mr. Wilson of National Pride Car Wash and Mr. Dunstan of ARCO ' to develop an acceptable access plan for these two sites. We agreed that these sites would be limited to two driveways onto NE 3rd. A joint 40-foot drive would be located on the joint property line and another 30-foot drive would be located to the east on the east property line of the ARCO site. These driveways would be limited to right in - right out only. We also concurred in the location of three 30-foot driveways on NE 4th. These access points are consistent with the driveway ordinance for commercial development and also limits the impacts of these developments on NE 3rd. As a result of built in circulation constraints on-site, I don' t believe there will be a problem of pass through traffic on either side. With existing traffic congestion in this corridor and the access demands of commercial development, this appeared to be the best overall solution. *"41a7 GAN:ad cc: R. Houghton R. Bergstrom Erb) R. Blaylock REL(:Ie BAR 2619B6 4. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS How much water is consumed at car wash facilities? The concern regarding environmental aspects of new development is certainly a topic of Will the wastewater from car wash facilities affect the quality of water supplies? major interest at this time because of a growing awareness of limited resources and the impacts which new development can have upon these resources. A self-service car wash Will the exhaust emissions of customers' autos at car wash facilities produce air pollution facility, even though it is a relatively small-scale development, does utilize water, does problems? t produce wastewater with chemicals and pollutants, does attract vehicles which are a source of air pollutants, and does produce noise by the operation of its mechanical devices. As a result, a car wash facility is examined for environmental impacts in a manner similar to a large-scale development. The specific environmental considerations addressed in this „.,. analysis are water consumption, quality of water effluent, and air quality. WATER CONSUMPTION One of the major concerns about self-service car wash facilities is water consumption and its effect on the local water supply. In order to evaluate the probable impact of National Pride car wash facilities on local water resources, an analysis of water consumption data for existing National Pride facilities as well as other various types of car washing methods was J performed. t 1 1~ Data gathered at National Pride car wash facilities indicate that an average site would ,, — serve approximately 200 vehicles on an average weekday and approximately 435 vehicles 4 r j , per day on an average weekend. During this survey, an average of 2.3 wash/rinse cycles � -1 per auto was observed for all sites. A typical car wash would use an average of approxi- -" mately 2,950 gallons of water per day (weekday) and 6,410 gallons per day (weekend). The POI # expected peak daily use would be approximately 5,450 gallons per day (weekday) and 8,460 gallons per day (weekend). This average daily water demand is equivalent to a residential IwSE Y roMiiT population of approximately 30 to 35 persons (about 10 single-family homes). This demand is also equivalent to a sit-down type restaurant serving 350 patrons on an average weekday z or a fast food type restaurant serving 1,000 patrons.1 l, ' . mon In comparison, an examination of 11 automatic car washes in the Chicago area indicated WO323-�1 the average water consumption of these facilities was 9,350 gallons per day, with the a highest daily average of these 11 facilities at 18,440 gallons per day. No data was available on peak daily water demand at these facilities, although it is expected to be approximately ? aidtwice that of the average day. A comparison of water consumption for various car washing ii methods is listed in Table 6. r Island containing vacuums and trash receptacles (San Antonio, Texas) L 1 Assuming an average usage of eight gallons/patron. Source: DeChiaro, J. and Copelman, Lee, Urban Planning and Design Criteria, 2nd Edition, 1975. 14 15 Table 6 VEHICLE DRYING AREA COMPARISON OF WATER CONSUMPTION: FOR VARIOUS CAR WASHING METHODS After washing their vehicles, National Pride customers exit the wash bay and either 0 proceed to the driveway to leave the site, or find a place to park and dry their vehicles. The Average Gallons O Per Vehicle number of spaces provided for drying purposes is also a key site design factor because it also affects circulation patterns within the site and traffic flow out of the site. Air 100— OP During the peak period observations at existing National Pride facilities, the number of vehicles parked in the drying areas was recorded. During periods when all wash bays were occupied, the drying area was occupied by an average of seven vehicles, with a maximum of 16 vehicles. This corresponds to an occupancy rate of 0.7 spaces per wash bay and 1.6 75- spaces per wash bay, respectively. It is recommended that a drying area be provided for 1.5 vehicle spaces per wash bay [e.g., 15-vehicle spaces for 10 wash bays.] This drying area should be located on the site �t where it is convenient to vehicles exiting the wash bays, but where it does not interfere 50- with the circulation lane leading to the exit. Air WATER AND ICE CONDITIONS 25- 41 A question frequently asked of National Pride concerns the occurrence of ice in the winter season on car wash driveway exits and adjacent streets as a result of water dripping from just-washed vehicles. Probably, the question is asked because most people have seen conventional tunnel car washes during the winter with a sheet of ice leading from the 0 / / / 7tunnel exit to the street and along the inside lane of the street. Therefore, this also was •C.• N\ �A a�` a�` •be' considered in the analysis as a potential design factor. of aJ e J.o off•a` of \e•ca °` `a 1,0`�o'`a P°` �`, P°`� ��o°al During the peak-period observations made at existing National Pride car wash facilities, v.a<<g`� o Prosc�s� atp�eca�\ �a`\a.,� 4b.,y pavement conditions were noted on the exit driveway and adjacent streets. At no time \.��o �o ���G��` � o during these observations at any of the 15 facilities surveyed did the pavement on the ,k driveway exit or on the adjacent street become wet as a result of dripping water from just-washed vehicles. These observations were made during the fall when temperatures were mild and ice formation was not possible. In a follow-up study conducted at five On a per-car basis, the National Pride operations would use approximately 10 to 182 locations in the Chicago area during the winter (December, January, and February) when gallons per auto depending upon the number of cycles used and the minutes per cycle and temperatures were below 20° F., a similar situation was noted. Ice does not form on the nozzle application rate provided at the facility. At present, none of these self-service driveways or adjacent street as a result of water dripping from just-washed vehicles. facilities recycle3 water. The reasons why ice formation is a problem at tunnel car washes and not at National Based on data from car wash association and manufacturers4 and from individual car Pride facilities are related to the amount of water used, the method of water application, wash operators, a typical mobile (roll over) car wash would use 30 to 40 gallons per auto and the configuration of the site. A conventional tunnel car wash will put approximately 50 served. These smaller automatic facilities do not presently recycle water, and it is not gallons of water on each vehicle, utilize a final rinse application at a flow rate of 50 gallons economically feasible for them to do so. per minute over the entire vehicle, and permit the vehicle to exit the wash tunnel approxi- mately 10 to 15 feet from the adjacent street. This results in water flowing from the vehicle onto the exit driveway and into the street, causing ice formation in the winter. 2 Based on National Pride car wash equipment specifications which indicate wash cycles of four minutes, , a water application rate of 1.4 to 1.6 gallons per minute (with high-pressure nozzle), and 2.0 to 3.0 cycles used per auto. At National Pride facilities, approximately 14 gallons of water are used on each vehicle, the rinse application is at a flow rate of 1.6 gallons per minute, and can only be applied to a 3 Recycling involves full or partial reuse of the water. Typically, this involves primary treatment of the portion of the vehicle at one time; and the vehicle must travel an average distance of recycled water (after application) to settle out grit. Recycled water (with no reclamation) is undesirable approximately 100 feet from the wash bay to the exit driveway. This results in less water on for the final rinse stage which is a major stage of water use. Additional water is required to make up for loss due to evaporation, water carried off by auto, and that portion of the water not recycled. the car and more time for the water to drop off before reaching the exit driveway. Also, as indicated previously, a significant percentage of National Pride customers dry their cars 4 International Car Wash Association; National Car Wash Council; Flapan Car Wash Equipment, Inc.; before exiting the site. Sherman Supersonics Industries, Inc. 16 13 The reason that these lines did not exceed two vehicles per wash bay is the low turnover rate of the wash bays. Customers realize that the driver of each vehicle ahead of them is The amount of water used per each auto at the larger automatic tunnel-type car washes going to take approximately 10 minutes to wash and rinse a car. Therefore, to be third in can vary considerably, depending upon the number of stages in the facility and the extent line translates into a 20- to 30-minute wait. Customers are unwilling to wait that long, to which water is recycled. Many facilities do partially recycle wash water, but few have the because they realize that they can come back at another time during the off-peak period capability of total recycling. Reclamation5 of water is infrequent due to the expense of the and wash their cars with little or no wait. equipment; no facilities are known to have total reclamation capability. Data indicates that these car washes may use between 40 and 200 gallons per auto without recycling, 10 to 80 It is recommended that a storage area be provided that allows two vehicles to queue gallons with complete recycling of the wash water only, and three to five gallons (minimum behind each wash bay with a 12-foot wide lane for access behind the queued vehicles. theoretical value) per auto if total recycling were implemented. A person washing his car at home would use approximately 80 to 100 gallons of water if _40 the hose were shut off when not in use. If it were to run continuously, water would be consumed at the rate of five to 25 gallons per minute, depending upon available water pressure and nozzle opening. In terms of maximum water demand, a 10-bay National Pride ��` ,: tv.• 6 car wash facility would use 16 gallons per minute. This is equivalent to three of four lawn / ; `�, sprinklers operating simultaneously. An evaluation of this water consumption data indicates that the National Pride VEHICLE DRYING AREA\::\'-\'011111i— ACES/BAY self-service car wash facilities are at most, modest water users, equivalent in average daily demand to approximately 10 single-family homes, a sit-down restaurant serving 350 " rir .° l' '' FTC I patrons, ora fast food restaurant serving 1,000 persons. When compared to other methods ,t "4 ,T - i '.- .� ofwashing automobiles, the self-service wash is the most efficient in terms of water j. I r `+ consumption using only 20 percent as much water as a washer at home and one-third as 11 ,4 ,� much water per car as a typical automatic car wash. National Pride facilities are as efficient WASH BAYS d as the automatic washers, even when using the best practicable recycling/reclaiming II. _ technology available today. _ !I) I =0 — ;.� National Pride car wash facilities actually help reduce water consumption rather than i' increase it. As evidenced by the customer interview survey, approximately 54 percent of .�� ,, National Pride customers use the self-service washing method rather than washing at home I� NE ;� with a hose (43 percent) or washing at an automatic car wash (11 percent). Both of these car %i�i o' II 1 • _t',7- washing methods consume significantly greater amounts of water than the self-service -L °• - I � operation. In addition, the fact that National Pride facilities are available does not induce VEHICLE STORAGE AREA 2 STORAGE SPACES/BAY ;,' people to wash their cars if they would not otherwise do so; only two percent of National Pride customers stated that they would probably not clean their cars if National Pride 74 facilities were not available. Thus, by attracting customers away from less efficient car �1 washing methods and not inducing additional people to wash their cars, National Pride 0 ,.5 mopfacilities help reduce water consumption. Typical site plan showing desired storage and drying areas WATER QUALITY In addition to the effect on local water supply, the effect on water quality is also a subject of concern. Since the National Pride car wash facilities discharge into sanitary sewers, the potential impact on water quality is related to the pollutants contributed by the facility and • the efficiency of the receiving wastewater treatment facility in removing the contaminants. 5 Reclamation involves recycled water which is given primary and some secondary treatment, thus allowing it to be reused in any portion of the wash or rinse stages. 12 17 Pollutants contributed by the self-service facilities include the detergents used in the 3' wash water and the grit, grease, oils, and salt removed from the auto. Analysis of the SITE DESIGN FACTORS detergents used by National Pride6 indicates there are no chemicals other than those found in household detergents or those used at other commercial car washes. While actual Several key site design factors affecting traffic circulation and storage within the car detergent composition and diluted strength are unique to National Pride, the individual wash facility were reviewed as part of this study. During observations at National Pride components are commonly-used products. The auto-borne pollutants washed off in the facility are, of course, typical of any car wash, whether at home or at an automobile facility. facilities, specific information was recorded regarding: All National Pride car wash facilities provide pretreatment to the wastewater by a sedimentation tank. The water from the wash bays drains into a tank where grit and other -- Site access. solids may settle out. The tank is periodically cleaned to maintain its proper operation. -- Vehicle queuing area. The potential impact of National Pride car wash facilities on local water quality was -- Vehicle drying area. assessed by comparing the effluent of a National Pride car wash with the effluent of a -- Water and ice conditions. typical single-family home. Chemical analyses7 of water samples from a National Pride car wash were used in determining the pollutant loading anticipated from this source. The samples were taken at the point where discharge from the facility enters the sanitary SITE ACCESS sewers (after passing through the sedimentation tank) and, thus, include both detergent and some auto-borne pollutants. Data on the effluent volumes for a single-family residence Access from the adjacent streets to most National Pride facilities is provided by one or were obtained from several sources used in the design of wastewater treatment systems.8 two driveways; at those facilities having two driveways, one is used for inbound and the The results of this comparative analysis are shown in Table 7. other driveway for outbound movements. The type of access provided is usually dictated by the prevailing pattern of access to existing development in the area, the dimensions of the As indicated, the total pollutant content from a car wash facility is equivalent to approxi- site, and the configuration of wash bays. mately 15 single-family homes. For the highest loading (COD), it is equivalent to 29 homes while for BOD5 and suspended solids, it is equivalent to 15 and six homes, respectively. Usually, National Pride car wash facilities are developed on open sites which are bordered by existing commercial developments that have established an access pattern, Under normal conditions, a car wash facility would have no impact on the final effluent i.e., driveways connected to the major streets. In these cases, the only option regarding discharged by a treatment plant to a receiving body of water (lake or river) since the access is whether to utilize one or two driveways in a similar manner. In cases where corner average wastewater volume and pollutant content from a car wash facility are typically lots are being developed, driveways can often be located on the minor streets to facilitate small relative to the combined totals from all sources entering a treatment plant. A traffic movement into and out of the car wash site. well-designed plant can accommodate the additional flow and pollutants with no loss of treatment efficiency. (Most plants are capable of 90 percent removal of critical pollutants.) The physical dimensions of the site often dictate the configuration of the wash bays (i.e., Thus, a car wash facility would have negligible impact on local water quality conditions. parallel or perpendicular to the major street) and the number and operational charac- teristics of the driveways. Where the size of the site is limited, it is difficult to develop one driveway which permits both efficient inbound movement to the vehicle queuing area AIR QUALITY behind the wash bays and outbound movement from the wash bays and drying area. In these cases, two driveways with one-way operation are recommended. When site With respect to the impacts of National Pride car wash facilities on air quality, the motor dimensions are large, it is recommended that one driveway be developed for both inbound vehicles attracted to the facilities are the most likely pollutant source. The major pollutants and outbound movements. generated by motor vehicles are nitrogen oxides, carbon monoxides, and hydrocarbons. Hydrocarbons and nitrogen oxides are precursors to the formation of photochemical oxidants. Current analytical techniques for simulating the complex interrelationships VEHICLE QUEUING AREA among hydrocarbons, nitrogen oxides, ambient aerosols, humidity, and sunlight do not permit a detailed analysis of the role that local traffic conditions play in the production of During peak periods, customers arriving at National Pride car wash facilities frequently oxidants. Carbon monoxide is a transportation-related pollutant that exhibits localized must wait in line to use the wash bays. The storage capacity of this waiting area is a key site impact characteristics. Using complex mathematical models, the peak carbon monoxide design factor because it affects circulation patterns within the site and the traffic flow into concentrations attributed to site traffic can be estimated. However, even a very casual the site. analysis indicates that the vehicle emissions at National Pride car wash facilities do not have a significant impact on air quality. During the 175 hours of observations at National Pride facilities during peak periods of operation (Fridays and Saturdays between 12:00 noon and 6:00 P.M.), all wash bays were occupied and vehicles were waiting to enter the bays for a total of 66 hours (38 percent of 6 Information on chemical compounds used in detergent provided by National Pride. the time). During these periods, an average of one vehicle was waiting behind each wash bay; the maximum number at any one time was two. 7 Letter Report of Laboratory Findings, Hayes-Seay, Mattern and Mattern, June, 1977. 8 See references. 18 11 SITE DESIGN FACTORS Table 7 SIGNIFICANCE OF NATIONAL PRIDE CAR WASH FACILITIES TO WATER QUALITY Average Water Pollutant Loadings (pounds/day) What type of driveway configuration best serves a self-service car wash? Single-Family National Pride Residence Wastewater(1) Wastewater(2) How many vehicle spaces should be provided behind the wash bays to ensure that traffic Biochemical Oxy gen-Demanding Materials will not back up into the street while waiting in line? (BOpS) 0.4 5.9 How many vehicle spaces should be provided for those desiring to dry their vehicles? Chemical Oxygen-Demanding Materials Does ice accumulate on the driveway and street adjacent to a National Pride car wash (COD) 0.5 14.5 facility during the winter season? Oil and Grease (3) 1.3 Nitrogen 0.1 0.2 x. fr Phosphate 0.2 1.2 +fit ' !• {rl.,. Suspended Solids 0.6 3.5 t ♦, . •', " Total Pounds/Day: 1.8 26.6 JM4 (1)Assumes 3.2 persons per single-family residence. ' . . (2)Assumes flow rate of 4,000 gallons per day. (3)Insufficient data. istasuor �, Analysis of 12 months of data from 50 National Pride facilities indicates the estimated maximum number of vehicles on the busiest day of the year at a facility was approximately 700, based on the number of wash/rinse cycles used. The U.S. EPA regulations governing - . facilities which attract mobile source activity (automobiles) indicates only developments -- generating 10,000 or more vehicles per day have significant potential for air quality impact. The Illinois Department of Transportation indicates that roadways having less than 4,000 vehicles on an average day have little potential for air quality (carbon monoxide) impact. ,..."''' The National Pride car wash traffic is one-fifth to one-tenth of these criteria and, therefore, '''''- the facilities have an insignificant effect on air quality. Drying area and landscaping treatment (Janesville, Wisconsin) REFERENCES 1. Fair, G.M. and Geyer, J.C., Elements of Water Supply and Wastewater Disposal, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, 1958. 2. "Process Design Manual for Phosphorus Removal," U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water Programs, Technology Transfer, Washington, D.C., October, 1971. 3. Salotto, B.V., Grossman, E. III and Farrell, J.B., "Elemental Analysis of Wastewater Sludges from 33 Wastewater Treatment Plants in the United States," Proceedings of the Research Symposium, Pretreatment and Ultimate Disposal of Wastewater Solids, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, May 21 and 22, 1974, EPA-902/ 9-74-002. 10 19 Table 5 NATIONAL PRIDE CUSTOMER CHARACTERISTICS Percent 1. How often do you come to National Pride car wash? ' Once per week 25% Once per two weeks 34 Once per three weeks 20 • Once per month 11 AESTHETIC CONSIDERATIONS Less than once per month 10 2. How far did you drive to get to this car wash? Less than one mile 26 What has been and can be done to insure a high-quality appearance for National Pride car One to three miles 43 washes? Three to five miles 18 Five to 10 miles 8 Where on the National Pride sites would landscaping be most appropriate? More than 10 miles 5 What types of landscaping treatments are most suitable for National Pride? 3. Did you travel to the car wash from home? Yes 76 No 24 �c4. Was your trip to this car wash part of another trip that brought you to this location? Yes 40 • No 60 /94 ,ri ' 5. How many wash/rinse cycles do you use? 4 - A: c g: • Y 21 r� i •• , ;,y • '' One -'1 Two 45 . Three 22 y4 .r S� ��_ �'�' Four 9 4c 4 i f •c 3 ...twig, may Five or more w r 6. If this car wash were not here, how would you clean your car? . W At home with a hose 43 7 Oar 0410At an automatic car wash 11 At another self-service car wash 44 Would not clean car 2 _ - _____ 7. How old are you? _ __ — _ �__ 16 to 19 26 �� 20 to 29 4 8 30 to 39 17 __ _ 40 to 49 6 50 or over 3 �. ..- , "'�'"� .,,;,,.,. Note: Of the 2,585 customers surveyed,920 were in the Chicago area,950 in the Dallas Fort Worth area, E and 715 in the Atlanta area. Landscaping treatment used at National Pride (Janesville, Wisconsin) 20 9 CUSTOMER TRAVEL CHARACTERISTICS A questionnaire was distributed to over 2,500 National Pride customers at facilities in the metropolitan areas of Chicago, Dallas-Fort Worth, and Atlanta. The purpose of this questionnaire was to identify customer travel characteristics and preferences. The results of the questionnaire survey are tabulated in Table 5. The major findings were: -- Most customers travel from home and live within three miles of the facility. -- A significant portion (40 percent) of the trips to the car wash were diversions from other trips past the site. -- The average customer uses between two and three wash/rinse cycles, resulting in 5 a service rate of eight to 12 minutes per vehicle. AESTHETIC CONSIDERATIONS -- Very few National Pride customers (11 percent) use automatic car wash facilities. -- Very few customers (two percent) said they would not wash their cars if a National The visual appearance of National Pride car wash facilities has evolved over the past 10 Pride car wash were not available. years and reflects different building materials, use of colors, and types of landscaping. In -- The average National Pride customer is between 20 and 29 years old. general, the appearance has steadily improved as National Pride has revised the design of many site elements and the character of the building. The most recently completed or remodeled facilities are attractive and represent a marked improvement in the appearance TRAFFIC IMPACT UPON ADJACENT STREETS of site elements and landscaping. National Pride car wash facilities are typically located on or adjacent to major streets which carry high volumes of traffic. The practice is to locate them on streets with average SITE ELEMENTS daily traffic volumes in excess of 20,000 vehicles per day. The objective is to achieve high accessibility (provided by the major street) and high exposure (resulting from the large Every National Pride facility contains a number of site elements which, when viewed numbers of vehicles passing the site). Because of the high volume nature of these streets, together in terms of color, texture, form, and condition, are responsible for the visual the impact of the car wash facility upon traffic conditions is an important consideration. appearance. The common site elements are briefly described in Table 8. In general, none of these elements has an objectionable appearance; nevertheless, some minor design refine- National Pride car wash facilities have little impact upon the traffic operation of adjacent ments are suggested to improve the aesthetic character of the sites. streets because they attract relatively low numbers of new vehicles. On a "design" weekend day, a National Pride car wash will attract only about 550 to 600 customers The site elements should be coordinated in terms of color, texture, and form and should (vehicles), of which 40 percent (220 to 240 vehicles) are already on the street and passing relate to the building materials in order to project the image of a "fami►y of furnishings." It the site en route to another destination. Thus, the net increase in new traffic on the street is is important that these various site elements harmonize rather than compete visually with 330 to 360 vehicles, or only one to two percent increase on a street carrying 20,000 vehicles each other. The shiny, stainless steel cases are in sharp contrast to the other colors being per day. On a peak-hour basis, the percent increase would be approximately the same for used on the building and site elements. The metallic finish should have a matte or slightly the design day and less on average days. roughened texture to reduce reflectability. The location and size of the vacuum equipment tend to accentuate its bulk relative to the building and other site elements. If possible, this The only definable impact of National Pride customer traffic on adjacent streets is the equipment should be coated, made of another material, screened by plantings, or reduced introduction of turning movements into and out of the site. Although the number of these in size in order to minimize its prominence. turns is small, the extent to which they interfere with non-site traffic depends on the efficiency of traffic flow adjacent to the site. Generally, if the site is located at mid-block (i.e., away from signalized intersections) where traffic flow moves freely, the additional car LITTER wash traffic will have no noticeable impact upon traffic conditions. If the site is located in proximity to a major signalized intersection where back-ups or congestion frequently occur, National Pride car wash facilities do not generate litter as a result of the operation. then customers will experience some delays in making left turns either into or out of the Receptacles are provided on the sites so that the litter that normally collects in the site. passenger car can be disposed of properly rather than strewn on public streets. These wood slatted receptacles are placed at logical, unobtrusive locations. Periodically, they are emptied into large trash dumpsters which are screened from sight. During observations conducted at 15 different National Pride facilities, the sites were generally clean and free of litter. 8 21 Table 3 Table 8 PEAK-HOUR TRAFFIC COUNTS OF VEHICLES ENTERING NATIONAL PRIDE CAR WASHES DESCRIPTION OF SITE ELEMENTS Weekday (one hour) Weekend (one hour) Posts Upright steel posts are used to protect building corners and site elements such as the vacuum cleaners from damage by misdirected cars. Occasionally, they are also used at the perimeter of the site, connected together with chains, as a secur- Peak-Hour Count 10 20 ity/traffic control device. Average Peak-Hour Count 25 40 Fences Both chain link and wooden screen fences have been used by National Pride for Highest Peak-Hour Count 55 65 perimeter security and screening of the site from adjacent properties as well as screening site elements such as trash dumpsters and vacuum cleaners. Design Hour Generation 35-40 50-60 Lights Sites are illuminated by 14-foot-high, pole-mounted lights. Special reflectors and Design Hour Generation Rate 4/wash bay 6/wash bay refractors are used to concentrate the light on the site while virtually eliminating spillover on to adjacent properties.These lights are located at the perimeter of the site,facing inward, with the light source shielded from view by the luminaire hood and lens. This lighting system effectively screens the light source from adja- cent properties. Signage National Pride generally uses mounted identity signs on the building exclusively. During 365 hours of traffic counts in peak periods (noon to 8:00 P.M.) at 15 existing The signs typically incorporate the eagle head logo and the words "Car Wash" on National Pride car wash facilities, the highest number of vehicles counted either entering the narrow building side,and the eagle head logo and words "National Pride Car or exiting during an hourly period were 55 vehicles on a weekday and 65 vehicles on a Wash"sometimes followed by Arabic numerals indicating the amount charged weekend. It is estimated that on a design day a National Pride car wash will generate 35 to for one wash on the long building side. 40 vehicles per hour on a weekday and 50 to 60 vehicles per hour on a weekend. Other site signs are small and used solely for traffic circulation and control pur- poses. Informational signs regarding operating procedures are mounted on the Once again, this volume has little meaning to most people without a comparison to the interior of the washing stalls. peak-hour generation of other types of developments. This comparison is provided in Table 4. As can be seen in this comparison, National Pride car wash facilities attract relatively low Banners The banners are triangular in shape;colored red, white,and blue;and incorpo volumes of traffic per peak hour. rate the eagle head logo. These banner flags are mounted on small poles anchored in the roof top at the building perimeter;they extend eight to 10 feet above the building and are used for promotions and grand openings. Trash Receptacles Trash receptacles are located on the inbound side of the wash bays in conjunc- Table 4 tion with vacuum cleaners and on the outbound side in proximity to the drying PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC COUNTS OF VARIOUS TYPES OF DEVELOPMENT area. The redwood slatted receptacles are attractive and lend to the site aesthetics. Vacuum Cleaners These are located on the inbound side of the stall,on the centerline of the wall Number of Vehicles separating the stalls;one vacuum island serves two washing stalls. In the most Entering recent locations, stainless steel vacuum cleaners are mounted. . .above the 300- MC ��� pavement on islands. Allir Ilir 200 - 453 O 100- OO nO 0 / / / / / rialir filliiri o r �ti �S a° �4 J . oQQL�' t.o " , cOs; sc.' AS ,Ser e \ �� PeS apQ T Ga+5 4, <,.e oaP+� ow c 4o0: c \s y oa• �: Qoed \cy Q � a 22 7 Table 2 LANDSCAPING AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC OF VARIOUS TYPES OF DEVELOPMENTS The landscape plantings at older National Pride facilities are often out of scale with the Number of Vehicles Entering mass of the building and, therefore, not effective in terms of screening adjacent properties 2500- rycy� 00 and softening large areas of pavement. They contrast sharply with those at newer facilities „es" where more and larger plantings have been used. 2000- The diagram below illustrates the basic site configuration for National Pride facilities and general landscaping zones. The landscaping zones are identified on a priority basis, Zone 1 1500- being the most important in terms of landscaping and Zone 4 the least important. KO iv 1000- cg / 7 500- / `3 \ ;' =,�' ----- - f(1", 1 2 , . 0 / / / / / / /, ° °J , „.„ a ,,;_„G ,fi � e \ .* r •S ffe ,C a �a ( Pk G S+ e i c „° obk, 'O S I L''S 4e \,p, ° ti e aa` O 00 #e sr CPP \a' \1 1.4, i � To put this volume of traffic into perspective, several types of commercial developments 111 > 1u along with the number of vehicles they attract each day are listed in Table 2. The compari- —1 son indicates that National Pride car wash facilities attract relatively low daily traffic !. A volumes. , r- �1: U) 410 BUILDING i�� -I PEAK-HOUR TRAFFIC oit. m =u Ii m 11� -I Although the traffic attracted each day is a common yardstick, it does not represent the ri4� .,r/._ j�\�� best means for evaluating the traffic impact of a development. Peak-hour traffic is a true :`'�� indicator of the most severe traffic conditions and this data is used by most traffic engineers in designing facilities. It is generally assumed that if volumes during the highest ':0 i 3 period can be accommodated efficiently, then volumes during other periods when less traffic occurs will not cause problems. The volumes of traffic attracted to a National Pride car wash facility during the peak hour %1��i also depend somewhat on weather conditions, day of week, and time of year, but they are - �1 3 '1�, 1 ' 1 more closely related to the number of wash bays and the average customer time in the wash \ `k, ,jI i bays. A National Pride car wash facility has a maximum capacity rate related to the number of service bays and the service rate per bay. This rate limits the number of vehicles that enter and exit the site during any hourly period. This situation is similar to that of a drive-in bank except that the average service rate at a National Pride car wash is 10 minutes as compared to two minutes at a bank. As a result, only about six vehicles can be processed through a service bay during an hour period in comparison to 35 at a bank. At a rate of six vehicles per hour per service bay, a 10-bay facility will serve approximately 60 vehicles per hour at capacity. This rate corresponds very closely to that determined from field surveys (see Table 3). 6 23 2. TRAFFIC CONSIDERATIONS In connection with the analysis of traffic considerations of National Pride car wash -- Zone 1. This area comprises the "front yard" and should receive careful attention to facilities, Barton-Aschman conducted an extensive data collection program. The program create a high quality image. included approximately 1,350 hours of traffic counts, 175 hours of observations, and 2,500 -- Zone 2. This area is on the approach side of the facility and should be landscaped to customer interviews at existing National Pride car wash facilities in the Chicago, provide a pleasant setting for customers waiting to enter the wash bays. Dallas-Fort Worth, and Atlanta areas. The results are summarized in this chapter. In the • analysis, traffic data were organized into these four categories: -- Zone 3. This area is on the departure side of the facility and should be landscaped for the patrons who use this area for drying their vehicles. -- Peak daily traffic volumes. -- Zone 4. This area represents the "back yard" and is suitable for edge screening and -- Peak hourly traffic. control buffering. These treatments vary qualitatively from site to site, depending upon adjacent land-uses and the area available for landscaping. For perimeter screen- -- Customer travel characteristics. ing treatments, landscape plantings or screen fencing may be used separately or in -- Traffic impact upon adjacent streets. combination. Planting criteria should enable selection of evergreen and/or deciduous trees and shrubs PEAK DAILY TRAFFIC on the basis of their growth characteristics, placement on the site with respect to function (i.e., screening, softening, display), and the plants adaptability to the local soils and The number of customers using self-service car wash facilities each day depends on environment. Plants used for Zone 1 should be of the highest quality and largest size weather conditions, day of the week, and season of the year. affordable and feasible. Typically, the most appropriate plants are large shade trees mixed with intermediate or evergreen trees of a planting height of six to eight feet, with sod and/or -- Volumes are extremely low during inclement weather (rain/snow). shrubs for accent and low-level screening. -- Higher traffic volumes occur on weekends than weekdays, with Saturday representing In Zones 2 and 3, shade trees should be used in conjunction with low-level shrubs selected the highest day and Sunday and Friday being approximately equal. for their seasonal interest characteristics, such as flowerings, fall color, texture, and form. It -- Higher traffic volumes occur during the winter season when washing the car at home is in these zones, that the most effective softening of the linearity of the building and the is difficult. large paved areas can be accomplished. Large trees in scale with the site can be used as extensions of the building stall walls in raised planters in conjunction with shrubs. This type The extent to which these conditions combine generally defines the level of traffic that can of planting location will soften the large expanse of pavement. be expected. Based on the traffic counts conducted as part of this study and a review of the daily sales records for the past year at approximately 50 National Pride facilities, it is In landscaping at the perimeter of the site (Zone 4) in order to screen or buffer adjacent estimated that on a "design day" a National Pride car wash will attract 300 to 350 vehicles properties, the number and size of plants should be dictated by the types of land-uses on on a weekday and 550 to 600 vehicles per day on a weekend (see Table 1). (A "design day" is adjacent properties as well as by the amount of space available for planting. The use of defined as a Friday, Saturday, or Sunday during the winter when the weather is good.) smaller shade trees would be appropriate here. These trees can be supplemented with an underplanting of shrubs; where space is limited, a screen fence can be used in lieu of the shrubs. When shrubs are used, they can be of the deciduous or evergreen types. Table 1 DAILY TRAFFIC COUNTS OF VEHICLES ENTERING NATIONAL PRIDE CAR WASHES Weekday Weekend (24-hour period) (24-hour period) Lowest Vehicle Count 60 230 Average Vehicle Count 200 435 Highest Vehicle Count 370 575 Design Day Generation 300-350 550-600 Design Day Generation Rate 35/wash bay 60/wash bay 24 5 TRAFFIC CONSIDERATIONS How much traffic do these car wash facilities generate? 6. SUMMARY OF FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS When do the peak-traffic periods occur? How often do patrons utilize these facilities and what distance do they travel? 1. Traffic Considerations What impact will this traffic have on the operation of the adjacent streets? . -- During peak conditions, National Pride car wash facilities serve 300 to 350 vehicles per day on a weekday and 550 to 600 vehicles per day on a weekend. Volumes equal 35 to 40 vehicles per weekday peak hour and 50 to 60 vehicles per hour on a weekend. -- In terms of both peak hour and daily traffic, National Pride car wash facilities '`.` attract relatively low traffic volumes. -- The facilities have minimal impact on adjacent street traffic because they attract ; • relatively low volumes of new traffic, normally a facility generates less than a two . •-T- _ � f j percentincrease in street traffic even during p peakoperating ours. e 1 _ q "" 2. Site Design Factors 5:-.,.— c n I ---- '1.�. fIW s n -- The type of access provided at National Pride car wash facilities is usually dictated by the prevailing pattern of access to existing development in the area, the dimen- x ® �I E. - -` �` sions of the site, and the configuration of the wash bays. —Aar 4 , .. Iii #; , -- It is recommended that a storage area be provided that allows two vehicles to queue .. ,, =. behind each wash bay with a 12-foot wide lane for access behind the queued vehicles. ,i7,... ?.+� 10• .,.P.,, = -- It is recommended that the vehicle drying area be equivalent to 1 .5 car spaces per `+` b wash bay (e.g., 15 spaces for 10 wash bays). . Ice does notformon NationalPride car washdriveways or streets adjacent to them -- e t ive ��'"" " during the winter as a result of water dripping from just-washed vehicles, and, thus, is not a design factor. View of transportation facilities serving National Pride car wash (63rd Street across from Midway 3. Environmental Considerations Airport, Chicago, Illinois) -- National Pride car wash units are, at most, modest water users. The average daily consumption is equivalent to that of 10 single-family homes. They use one-third the water per car of a typical automatic car wash, and are as efficient as an automatic car wash equipped with the best recycling devices available today. -- By attracting customers away from less efficient car washing methods (at home with a hose or at automatic car washes), National Pride facilities help reduce water consumption. -- Under normal conditions, the wastewater discharged from a National Pride facility would have no impact on the final discharge to a receiving body of water (lake or river). A well-designed sewage treatment plant can accommodate this discharge. -- The traffic volumes generated by National Pride car wash facilities are less than 20 percent of the levels established by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency to identify potential air quality problems; these facilities have no significant impact upon air quality. 4 25 Site Design Factors 4. Aesthetic Considerations 1. Review the various types of driveway configurations and access plans utilized at -- In general, none of the car wash site elements were considered to be visually National Pride facilities. Identify the positive and negative aspects of each. objectionable. However, some minor design refinements are advisable in order to achieve an optimum aesthetic character. 2. Survey a sample of 10 to 15 National Pride car wash facilities to determine the number of vehicles waiting to enter wash bays and the number of vehicles parked in the -- Site elements such as lighting, posts, trash receptacles, and vacuum cleaners drying area. should be considered a "family of features" and related in color, texture, and form. 3. From this information, develop guidelines for designing site access facilities, vehicle -- Landscape plantings should be placed on the site to perform such functions as queuing areas, and vehicle drying areas. screening, softening, and shading. -- There has been an obvious effort by National Pride to improve the aesthetic quality of its facilities. The improvement has been most evident in the area of landscaping Environmental Considerations and other elements. National Pride should continue to use color-coordinated building materials and local indigenous materials in retaining walls, planters, and special 1. Obtain data at National Pride car wash facilities regarding water consumption, paved areas. wastewater characteristics, and operating characteristics of mobile sources of air pollutants (automobiles). 2. Obtain similar data for other methods of car washing including automatic car washes and car washing at home. 3. Analyze the data to identify the probable impact that a National Pride car wash facility would have on water supplies, wastewater treatment facilities (water quality), and local concentrations of air pollutants. 4. Where appropriate, compare the data to standards and other criteria. The probable impact of the National Pride car wash facilities would also be compared to that of other car washing methods or other common types of land development or activities. Aesthetic Considerations 1. Complete an urban design inventory at several National Pride car wash facilities identifying common site elements and the relationship of these elements to each other. 2. Review the visual character of the site elements and establish objectives and guidelines regarding aesthetic qualities. 3. Review site plans and identify potential areas for landscaping, the types of landscaping treatments that would be compatible with the visual character of the site, and the appropriate types of landscaping materials and plantings. 26 3 1. INTRODUCTION A self-service car wash is a facility that is new to many communities. As a result, the introduction of a National Pride facility in a community usually stimulates questions about its operation and its impact upon existing conditions. Typically, the questions reflect interest in the following: -- Traffic movement on the street system. -- Traffic circulation and storage of vehicles on the site. • -- Environmental considerations such as consumption of water, impact on water quality, and noise generated by the facility. 41 -- Aesthetic considerations such as the appearance of site features and landscaping. 4 q tsw►NanoNAL PRIDE CAR WASH In response to this interest, National Pride requested Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc. I •1. = to analyze its car wash operation and appraise the impact upon area conditions. The major 1 _ *�'" � f thrust of this analysis was to identify the characteristics of National Pride car wash facilities and then compare these characteristics with those of other developments which are more widely known. SCOPE The analysis was divided into four basic areas corresponding to the four types of inquiries commonly received from community residents and public officials: traffic considerations, site design factors, environmental considerations, and aesthetic considera- tions. A specific work program was established for each of these areas in order to gather sufficient information to respond to the questions. The elements of each program are listed below. Lighting pattern showing delineation of National Pride's lot with no spillover onto adjacent properties (Arlington, Texas) Traffic Considerations 1. Obtain sales statistics on National Pride car wash facilities during 1977. 2. Select a sample of five to 10 existing National Pride car wash facilities for more detailed analysis. This should include 24-hour machine traffic counts at each sample facility on weekdays and weekends to determine daily and hourly traffic generation and the relationship between car wash cycles and traffic generation. 3. Select a sample of 10 to 15 existing facilities for detailed analysis regarding peak-hour traffic generation and customer travel characteristics. Conduct manual traffic counts and distribute a questionnaire to National Pride customers during peak periods on both weekdays and Saturdays. 4. Analyze data to identify traffic characteristics at National Pride facilities and compare these results to those measured at other types of commercial development. 2 27 -.. , ,...- --, , . - 1\lk ,\e I r rtf, ,t,,,:,,,....,:$1 `yam: ��/,J�j .. .,.v. :. '4 f ^C t wt` j, �y ,:: y T•n4 ... , ✓' ,: r, ♦ 'dcY°'¢ 4 41 e t , Alle.-�!'y J:`'; w s _. w , Rendering of National Pride car wash (Dundee Road, Palatine, Illinois) • t ,� :. ..�. _- — : . - '- .- _ CONTENTS View from street showing vacuum islands and landscaping (San Pedro Avenue, San Antonio, 1' INTRODUCTION 2 Texas) Scope 2 2. TRAFFIC CONSIDERATIONS 5 Peak Daily Traffic 5 Peak-Hour Traffic 6 Customer Travel Characteristics 8 Traffic Impact Upon Adjacent Streets 8 3. SITE DESIGN FACTORS 11 Site Access 11 Vehicle Queuing Area 11 Vehicle Drying Area 13 Water and Ice Conditions 13 4. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS 15 Water Consumption 15 Water Quality 17 Air Quality 18 5. AESTHETIC CONSIDERATIONS 21 Site Elements 21 Litter 21 Landscaping 23 6. SUMMARY OF FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 25 28 1 NATIONAL PRIDE EQUIPMENT, INC. BARTON-ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. National Pride Equipment, Inc., is the country's largest operator of self-service car Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc., is a multidisciplinary group of consultants organized washes. There are currently 125 National Pride car washes located in 12 states. These to provide comprehensive services to a wide range of public agencies and private clients facilities are all modern in appearance and have been built during the 1970s. concerned with the physical and human aspects of urban development. Corporate headquarters of National Pride are located in Melrose Park, Illinois. The ' The firm's practice extends through urban and regional planning, large scale develop- company is financially strong and has a capital base in excess of $5,000,000. Large holders ment planning, environmental planning and design, transportation planning, traffic of National Pride securities include State Farm Insurance Company and the University of engineering, civil engineering and design, and landscape architecture. Chicago. National Pride designs and manufacturers its own equipment and custom blends the detergents used in its operation. Barton-Aschman Associates was formed in 1958 through the merger of the transporta- tion engineering practice of George W. Barton and Associates (founded in 1945) and the During the 1970s, self-service car washing has come of age. This is by far the most planning practice established by Frederick T. Aschman (1918-1971). The organization of a energy- and water-efficient way to wash a car. It is also non-polluting and is inexpensive consulting firm to integrate the disciplines of transportation engineering and land-use compared to automatic washing. In a self-service car wash, the customer provides the planning was a first in the field, and the success of the effort led over the years to an necessary labor. The customer uses a high-pressure spray to clean his or her vehicle, extension of this multidisciplinary approach to many other areas of urban problem solving. including campers, pickups, vans, and motorcycles. The Barton-Aschman staff totals approximately 175 men and women, and is composed of All National Pride facilities contain at least eight separate washing bays. Equipment is transportation engineers, urban planners, development specialists, environmentalists, activated through coin-operated metering devices located in each washing bay. Once the civil engineers, and landscape architects. The firm is headquartered in Evanston, Illinois, meter has been activated, the customer directs the high-pressure spray onto the car from a and maintains permanent offices in Washington, D.C.; Minneapolis, Minnesota; San Jose wand secured to a high-pressure hose. Customers also can use the convenient and Pasadena, California; and Toronto, Canada. coin-operated vacuums to clean the interior of their cars. Most customers spend about 10 minutes in the washing bay and end up spending about$1.50 to clean their cars, inside and From its inception, Barton-Aschman Associates has striven to be a leader in its ability to out. address complex, interrelated urban problems. Public demand for this kind of consultant skill has steadily increased along with public sensitivity to the impact of development on National Pride is an independent company whose only business is to provide reliable the physical, economic, and social environment. equipment and neat, clean, attractive facilities to customers wishing to wash their own cars. In 1978, about 15,000,000 cars will use National Pride facilities. BARTON-ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. Evanston: 820 Davis Street, Evanston, Illinois 60201 (312) 491-1000 Washington,D.C.: 1730 K Street,Northwest,Washington, D.C. 20006 (202) 466-8230 Minneapolis-St. Paul: Ten Cedar Square West/Cedar-Riverside, 1610 South Sixth Street Minneapolis,Minnesota 55404 (612) 332-0421 San Jose: 4320 Stevens Creek Boulevard,Suite 220,San Jose,California 95129 (408) 249-5300 Pasadena: 180 South Lake Avenue,Suite 260,Pasadena,California 91101 (213) 449-3917 Toronto: Barton-Aschman Canada Limited,111 Avenue Road,Suite 604,Toronto,Ontario M5R 2N7 (416) 961-7110 111 lilt • 3201 West Lake Ave. i NATIONAL Melrose Park IL 60160 800-323-3291 DUNIT NOT OOD DOCUMENT NOT GOOD FOR MICROFILMLNG FOR MICROFILMING OPERATION AND IMPACT ANALYSIS OF NATIONAL PRIDE CAR WASHES • Prepared for NATIONAL PRIDE CITY Car SIMON By Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc. r 1 C D May, 1978 FEB2 � 1986 E3UILDiJ1.i �:� rii+.� v. 3 . OF RA, A, �o , ' � TGIF CITY OF RTRNTON w MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 o ® `` ° BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR 0 LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER 90 `o- FRED J. KAUFMAN. 235-2593 094, � SEP "CP MEMORANDUM DATE: March 25, 1986 TOo Traffic Engineering, Policy Development, Building and Zoning, Fire Department and Police Department FROM: FRED J. KAUFMAN, HEARING EXAMINER SUBJECT: John S. Wilson National Pride Car Wash SA-008-86 I have continued the hearing on the above entitled matter in order to receive additional data relative the merits of providing two driveways from a commercial car wash proposed for property located between N.E. 3rd and N.E. 4th Street, just west of Jefferson Avenue N.E. The proposed driveways access upon N.E. 4th Street and directly aim toward single family homes located north of the site. The use will be open 24 hours per day, 7 days per week. The applicant controls the property immediately to the east of the subject site and joint access with that lot is potentially possible, and has been proposed in a limited fashion. I would like additional input regarding two driveways along N.E. 3rd street with reasonable separation, closure of one or both driveways along N.E. 4th Street, limited right-in/right-out turning on N.E. 3rd. as well as the potential shortcut created by the proposed driveway pattern which might permit avoidance of traffic signals in the area. I would' also like additional information and exploration of the land use affect of permitting the car wash and the potential gasoline service station access into the residential neighborhood north of the site, 24 hours per day. The hearing has been continued to April 8, 1986 and I would appreciate your comments not later than April 1, 1986. Please make those comments available to Roger Blaylock. Thank you. 2271Z CITY OF RENTON HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING MARCH 25, 1986 AGENDA COMMENCING AT 9:00 A.M.: COUNCIL CHAMBERS. SECOND FLOOR. RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING The applications listed are in order of application number only and not necessarily the order in which they will be heard. Items will be called for hearing at the discretion of the Hearing Examiner. JOHN S. WILSON (NATIONAL PRIDE CAR WASH) Application for site plan approval to build a self-service car wash, file SA-008-86; property located between N.E. Third Street and N.E. Fourth Street near Jefferson Avenue N.E. BRYANT MOTORS, INC. Application to rezone 8,240 square feet of property from R-1, Residential-Single Family, to B-1, Business Use, file R-079-85; and application for approval of a conditional use permit to allow a light industrial use of a bus sales and storage lot on said rezoned property per Section 4-748(D)(2)(b). file CU-022-86; property located at 125 and 129 Meadow Avenue North. 2285Z BUILDING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING MARCH 25, 1986 APPLICANT: JOHN S. WILSON FILE NUMBER: SA-008-86 A. SUMMARY & PURPOSE OF REQUEST: The applicant seeks site plan approval to build a self-service car wash facility consisting of a 3,976 square foot building with 10 washing bays, 5 vacuum islands, 1 vending island and 25 parking stalls. B. GENERAL INFORMATION: 1. Owner of Record: John S. Wilson • 2. Applicant: John S. Wilson 3. Location: (Vicinity Map Attached) Located between N.E. Third Street and N.E. Fourth Street near Jefferson Avenue N.E. 4. Existing Zoning: B-1. Business Use 5. Existing Zoning in the Area: G-1, General Use: R-1, Residential-Single Family: P-1, Public Use: B-i, Business Use: and L-1, Light Industrial 6. Comprehensive Land Use Plan: Medium Density Multi-Family 7. Size of Property: ± .92 acre 8. Access: N.E. Third Street and N.E. Fourth Street 9. Land Use: Undeveloped Property 10. Neighborhood Characteristics: North: Single Family Residential Uses, Renton Vocational Technical School East: Undeveloped Property, King County Health Department South: Undeveloped Property West: Multiple Family Uses C. HISTORY/BACKGROUND: Action File Ordinance Date Annexation --- 2249 June 22, 1966 Rezone (G to B-1) R-676-71 2655 Aug. 16. 1971 Short Plat Short Plat-382-79 --- Aug. 17, 1979 Waiver W-383-79 --- Aug. 17, 1979 Lot Line Adjustment LLA-025-79 --- Dec. 26, 1979 D. PUBLIC SERVICES: 1. Utilities: a. Water: There is an 8-inch water line along N.E. Fourth Street, a 12-inch water line along Jefferson Avenue N.E., and a 16-inch water line along N.E. Third Street. PRELIMINARY REPORT 1 1HE HEARING EXAMINER JOHN S. WILSON, FILE NC,. 3A-008-86 MARCH 25, 1986 PAGE 2 b. Sewer: There is an 8-inch sanitary sewer line near the subject property on N.E. Fourth Street. c. Storm Water Drainage: Storm water flows into an existing storm water system. 2. Fire Protection: Provided by the City of Renton as per ordinance requirements. 3. Transit: N/A 4. Schools: a. Elementary Schools: N/A b. Middle Schools: N/A c. High Schools: N/A 5. Recreation: N/A E. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE ZONING CODE: 1. Section 4-711, Business Use (B-1). F. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR OTHER OFFICIAL CITY DOCUMENT: 1. Commercial Goal and following objectives: V(A) Commercial Areas Objective: V(B) Commercial Structure and Sites Objective: V(D) Community Commercial Areas Objective, Policy Element, City of Renton, Comprehensive Plan Compendium, January 1985, p. 16-18. 2. Northeast Renton Plan, City of Renton, Comprehensive Plan Compendium, January 1985, p. 55-60. G. DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS: 1. The applicant, John S. Wilson, is requesting site plan approval to allow the construction of a self-service car wash facility (National Pride). The subject site is 40,075 square feet located between N.E. Third Street and N.E. Fourth Street approximately 135 feet west of Jefferson Avenue N.E. The one story brick structure with a mansard style metal roof will contain ten operational bays and the equipment room with one bay for large RV vehicles or trucks at the northern end of the building. The applicant in plans dated March 14, 1986 includes 16 standard size parking spaces and 7 compact spaces. The site plan includes a 55 foot wide buffer area to the north along N.E. Fourth Street to screen the single family residential area from the commercial site. The proposed building is located in a north-south fashion to allow access and queueing from the east side of the lot through to the west side. Vacuum stations are located on the east side of the building in an attempt to reduce noise into the multiple family residential development located along the northwest property line. The 23 parking spaces have been provided along the western property line to provide an area for people to pull their cars in and dry them off. Access to the subject site is shown over a common curb cut on N.E. Third Street with the adjacent lot to the east. The developer controls this lot and has tentatively sketched in a proposed future development on the site. The intent of the curb cut is to provide unified direct access to similar and compatible uses proposed on both lots. The applicant has also shown a western curb cut along N.E. Third Street and two access points on N.E. Fourth Street. These three access points would be specifically one way to direct traffic through the site. 0 • PRELIMINARY REPORT 1 1-HE HEARING EXAMINER JOHN S. WILSON, FILE NL. A-008-86 MARCH 25, 1986 PAGE 3 2. The subject site is designated as medium density multiple family on the Comprehensive Plan. The proposal does not comply with that intent: however, the present zoning of B-1. Business Use, was applied to the property prior to the modification of the Comprehensive Plan in December, 1981. The site plan review process is being required as a condition of the original rezone of the subject site because of its sensitive nature in relationship to the single family residential areas to the north. The proposal as submitted does appear to comply with that specific intent. 3. The Environmental Review Committee has issued a declaration of • non-significance. The appeal date expired on Monday, March 17, 1986, at 5 p.m. In addition, the Environmental Review Committee as stated under their separate substantive authority, Section 4-2822(D), states that the decision maker should include the following conditions in his decision: a. The elimination of the western most curb cut on N.E. Third Street. b. The increasing of the landscape buffer adjacent to the residential units along the northern half of the western property line. The landscaped area should be increased to a minimum of 10 feet with landscape materials at least 4 feet in height at the time of installation. 4. Various City departments have reviewed the subject proposal. The Police Department has recommended approval without conditions. The other departments have recommended approval with conditions or denial of the project as proposed. Their comments are as follows: © Police Department: Approved. February 11, 1986 o Fire Department: Approved with conditions. February 11, 1986 1. Meets Fire Department fire flow requirements. May need the installation of or relocation of hydrants (see plans). 2. Need to know locations of hydrants on N.E. Fourth Street (not shown on site plan). © Building Division: Not approved. February 14, 1986 If the facility is a 24-hour use, the access to north will have adverse impacts on residential uses. Access should be limited to N.E. Third and a substantial buffer provided along northern property line. o Policy Development: Approved with conditions. February 19, 1986 It is advised that the landscaping proposed for the western property line be extended for the length of the site and perhaps widened as well. o Traffic Engineering: Not approved. February 12, 1986 1. N.E. Third Street - western driveway should be marked one way out when width is less than 30 feet. 2. N.E. Fourth Street - show only one driveway on drawing. 30 feet in width at right angle. Present proposal as shown would encourage pass-through traffic from/to N.E. Third Street from/to N.E. Fourth Street. © Design Engineering: Approved with conditions. February 11, 1986 1. Driveway to be per City'of Renton standards - one only. 2. Storm water retention required. Plans to be 22°' x 34" original mylar. • PRELIMINARY REPORT 1 'HE HEARING EXAMINER JOHN S. WILSON, FILE NO. SA-008-86 MARCH 25, 1986 PAGE 4 3. Install sidewalks on N.E. Third and N.E. Fourth Streets. 4. Grease or sand trap required for any sanitary sewer discharge - Metro industrial waste discharge permit required (see Doug Hildebrant of Metro, 447-6743). © Utility Engineering: Not approved. February 20, 1986 1. Subject to water plans if hydrants required. 2. City held latecomers agreement on N.E. Third Street - $914.08 • 3. Systems development charge for water $1,603.01 4. Systems development charge for sewer $1,603.01 TOTAL $3,206.02 5. Minimum 750 gallon grease/oil trap required on sanitary sewer. © Parks and Recreation: Approved with conditions. Extensive buffering on adjacent multiple family development and single family located across N.E. Fourth Street. 5. In the review of the site plan, the staff and the Hearing Examiner should normally consider the following criteria. o Compatibility of Adjacent Structures © Compliance with the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code o Access © Functionality of Parking o Traffic Circulation o Usable Public Open Space o On-site Recreation Compatibility of Adjacent Structures: The proposed one story commercial building constructed out of brick with a metal roof is generally consistent with the other one story single family residences to the north as it relates to height. The building is smaller than the multiple story residential complex to the northwest. Uses to the south and east are public/quasi-public or commercial in character. The proposed building style does not appear to be an intrusion into those areas. Compliance with the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code: The Comprehensive Plan as revised in 1981 calls for the area to be medium density multiple family. The present B-1 zoning classification was applied prior to that date and it was intended that this triangular piece of property serve as a small retail area supporting the adjacent residential and public uses. The proposal complies specifically with the intent of the original rezone, and a concern that the site be evaluated through the public hearing process to assure that an appropriate transitional buffer be created. The applicant has provided an extensive landscape buffer approximately 55 feet wide along the northern property line and a 10 to 20 foot wide landscape buffer adjacent to the multiple family residential uses along the northwest portion of the site. This complies not only with the intent of the original rezone decision but the recent Environmental Review Committee decision to buffer the multiple family area. The issue that remains is: Is the intensity of the use too great for an area adjacent to the single family and multiple family residences? The intrusion into those areas is a result of access and traffic circulation. • • • PRELIMINARY REPORT Or-HE HEARING EXAMINER JOHN S. WILSON, FILE N6,. 3A-008-86 MARCH 25, 1986 PAGE 5 Access: Access was specifically limited by the Environmental Review Committee to three locations. This was intended to preclude access through the site to circumvent the new traffic signal that will be constructed at N.E. Fourth Street and Jefferson Avenue N.E. and the fact that the proposed location had poor site distance. The applicant responded with new plans (March 14, 1986), which included directional movements through the lot and a common curb cut along the eastern property line on N.E. Third Street. The primary advantage is that it not only complies with the Comprehensive Plan goal of limiting curb cuts on arterials, but it is an excellent example of how two sites can function together. The applicant has included a schematic plan showing how the adjacent site could be developed with a mini-market. The plan does not comply with the ERC decision to eliminate the western most curb cut on to N.E. Third Street. Even though the plan does show a redesign to establish directional flow of traffic through the site so that commuters could not cut through to avoid the new signal at N.E. Third Street and Jefferson Avenue N.E., it does not functionally preclude that possibility. The only method to actually eliminate access through the site would be to eliminate all access onto N.E. Fourth Street. Based upon the original ERC decision, motorists could still circumvent the traffic signal by utilizing the paved areas along the eastern side of the property. Functionality of Parking Lot: The parking area provided for the car wash facility is actually a service area of that car wash. Probably only one car will be parked in the 23 spaces for employees of the car wash; the remainder will be people drying off their cars. It is anticipated that an extremely high rate of turnover of parking spaces will, therefore, be encouraged. Instead of having so many parking spaces, it might be more appropriate to widen the parking spaces because the parking spaces are not going to be utilized for parking. They are going to be utilized for hand drying. Traffic Circulation: The applicant's plans attempt not only to resolve the traffic circulation problems on and surrounding their own site but how it impacts the adjacent property to the east. Eastbound left turns from N.E. Third Street onto the subject site will be impossible in the future because of higher traffic volumes. Therefore, the applicant's desire through circulation not only to serve the commercial traffic on N.E. Third Street but the residential traffic accessing the site from the large residential areas to the north is reasonable. The traffic circulation does prove to be an intrusion into the residential areas to the north. Because the facility will be open 24 hours a day, light and glare will be introduced into the residential houses on the north side of N.E. Fourth Street. There is not any present methodology to screen or buffer that glare from the residential area except by elimination of access to N.E. Fourth Street. This action would severely limit the functional use of the site and also create major traffic hazards on N.E. Third Street because left turning movements would have to be forced onto the street. In addition, construction of the traffic signal at N.E. Third Street and Jefferson Avenue N.E. provides a logical control point for people to access back on to N.E. Third Street in a safer manner. 0 ' PRELIMINARY REPORT 1, HE HEARING EXAMINER Th JOHN S. WILSON, FILE Nt':.. aA-008-86 MARCH 25. 1986 PAGE 6 Usable Public Open Space/On-site Recreation: Neither of these criteria are appropriate when looking at a service oriented commercial facility. Open space and on-site recreation are normally associated with employment facilities or residential developments. The site will provide a limited commercial service and will not need either public open space or on-site recreation. H. DEPARTMENTAL RECOMMENDATION: Based upon the above analysis. it is recommended that the Hearing Examiner approve the site plan request as submitted by the applicant. John S. Wilson, dated March 14, 1986 with the condition that the western-most curb cut on N.E. Third Street be eliminated. J 7.- i ,A` :,- ,,1,� .ice ',;�5�-- I� ' ' '/'ite•;� /' v, '°2., ,$, _ ii'•Lv,1T'!ci .- I e•.1 .\ ,�1 ..r .•„ ea 3.. e o '.ee. J 1._ \ 11° ``• a t• 6 �..�l_T I PACIFIC CAQ \ (�?/rr ,,yJI,ID I.` :M'y ` -, s r•.•., y..• �' , .�9 T - •--�1 wi /1J• .. � \S°.'•.• . , •_l 0" ,:h 2a a `_'�,•• Ikj,• , — I//'�� Y/ iitis7t,,,,-;, ,j-,\ v,°� /.�'�' ni r'9'7��(1•a�•, S�, "1 1a• •'�• •_ - '�� ([ ? I.,I' � �._ WINDSOR hi,L5 '---, v}rn',^�•+' +',.Ti, ,6a�`,, ®��.c• t t .Q' ----� �; �e7`s-1 sJ — ��/ i i /• , n`r PGR g r.�r'�?._. .�I- _ �4.ea el:..._. '. i Q--- (• ,.J cy-�C._; I T\ ._.r� /•i!p 1 I;i -. __.._.. ,1, '/ ,tj \ {.. �,,.�— -- � --- /- ., _.....• . . , ..• 7._..L.zi ,,. :.11,..,,. .. ... .. ],,,_. . . ,1...;.:...72..,/,,/ ,/,, ir.. ,,,. / ; 7:7:,,,,, .,, ‘ , . 4 G-1 , - ‘,..•••,.!. :: If."?, ' . : / r I i� J `'T ' r % .-_ 7, ) n �,f'. ,� mar' • .y' ! • �` a [1 ai® Fl 1% ),. \ ^ .\pJ•_ 1 i .5:1-J-- I .�,a 1 II 1 �.1 /p � ' �,1/� ma , 481 r a\ M11'OUL£; I ,I , // o 1 d:, /'• /` I CFDAR RIVER \ \ I '1�� 4 ^/�PA R K. I /(Q' • • il i N'N .,. \ II ., . fuaaa� 1, t—1' I I 15 ' i J I 1 ' 9i l 8a I �p 7. ✓nL jI zl :1 as . . • •) I 1 L7 �f!. , i I',•4I ; 'I I JOHN S. WILSON SA-008-86 APPL I CANT JOHN S. WILSON TOTAL AREA - .92ACRE PRINCIPAL ACCESS N.E. 3RD ST AND N.E. 4TH ST EXISTING ZONING B-1, BUSINESS USE EXISTING USE UNDEVELOPED PROPERTY PROPOSED USE CAR WASH FACILITY • COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN MEDIUM DENSITY MULTI-FAMILY COMMENTS o' `', ! I l I bit :%; `- 1 , Ih�n AlIlli ` 0 m ELEMENT ti14 1 1■■ - III■■■■1 • ��■ /711101 ' • B •i ,.,• 7■t�■■■■1 1 i1■■■■1■■1. nu■■Im um ur, �'®8�'I erC�c�,l } • ,.111.1E I Single Family +1 1 ff ,. I ^+olio a � . •/ {t �:,` - ®� ®���8$� E Office / Office Pei _.4 y _. .'0000000. ``t ;::::."•••• : ,. Medium De' sits 000000 Pub@ic/Quay-'Pub 1 t: � ;000000°•; fi p jy$ o000000 ��q'',. t yJ 6piti—F ami i0000000.,j, ``▪ f� �.� ••, : High Density ©000,; �s��$ �f;�d�a�tria9 y ; F s� 2• ;' , h,s. r 1t�Oti®Fa�ABy o.00D°= libiCi" e'''''''• ■.Rini I i I - • • • ��cr�at'sls,� © ® Heavy industrial o ` :� r ® n o q' .2,' S y cue s.Gr a.,, `� .. Manufacturing 1:3a / Muitople Optic °. 1,°,10, ' , -- ig, , 1 7 .fG f�° 0': is:: of, �7;7) ji.. :IN :III:::.VI . M' .00 rr Ell a• I1 olio■II 11! w� s.r� r`. 1�� '.•°•o•o•o, `` I�� �+; ..r..-vvr��itt ' 111�10�` ..' c�I it'°, . .� .' 7P ^� 1 :00000; �G1 . ,1.L ' r • n 1 �•°°o°o°o• • lsr: o Nr,, �S 000000 :/ O © O O O`5� \■lion'\■' 00000000'. .'' ., y O m O O O ` #!.`. - • 17,,..�■1■■F■■Ii ,_n• k � \iirim,-, .. ...000000•0O 0 • �'a O ® O O •r' O O `(, `r.:>Y..•� ,S, J i�/UF■■►■ 'AM . 000000� ,{';dD, fl 0 0 0 + a O Omut 00000• ■.�■w MEI o00000 +�P u 0 0 o . 0% 0 G .:' ' 1::•.:.q:.:::: , ---inliic '''':':aillitrii:-" lin . if , a O 0 0 0 0 0 �p\ O © .,J p000 0 ®000(�00000 6 ` , , ) `■�f•�' r lea�' ''0000000000.tilt ", O O O x, © O IO O O 't�Q;1 �'� ,}� `�0000000000•, •• IJ(' . 001 " ' -,, °OOQ000017.0 ® © © © po0oo. 0 �' Aso°'I co ® o o En o o 0 0 0 o ,t� °oRi 161 , 1..... . 00000 , ' O O O O b O :j { , ii _ A p•rj1( IUItim.' `' : . 00000''.: o 0 o o b o a ;1 1 14' '�o' 1y■• K © O o ® o• '''''''L....,f�tIll � �� '"1�',+ ,�k'• o. :ail i■ii■uui■i.,` q t� r 0 00 ,.■■■■,t� ■■■ 1 !. .: j 1'I■, O O+b O Q , ;'µ>y® J> 0 0°°'0°0°�. ■■1P+i1■■■■■n t;k -S A t tl 4 • ;'� lit i1 Q'Iq`tQ1 , qi ;.„b t 1 ° ,. 1.. Iy�■10 ■■1111/�h ; �4., Oi is.. �s k tl�t ��ft 4` 1' f�•i ;c-, t■�■\■1 ■■rittii �r•tl 1�■U■1• ' " '+,. .y—^, rev "o 0 0 "'<'- • / ■■1�I •o....°o s 1■�1■■■1 O■■.J■■1 HO�1■■1�� i■1■■1 i'_' 3 0000000000' 0 �. p5�11� •�1 .•o fl ,��. =)e o°°o��3 .000000000. � ,�■1■�� ''■■■■. !" �0� ®`iUd■�.�'� e 111r ..ati •• 00000100000.0000000000 ' 7 _ 1 l -- • ® '� f1 J000000000•0000000000' #�■■■ ■■" ®E•.IJ1;t • I s e. lr/ �4 000000000° O°°°°°°°°• tin v' ..liili�} <� •• .,'*•�+ l00000000a•0000000000•� ;; �...�. ■lle, 11. _ 000• 013 0▪ 0000.0000000000 '' d JII�! �� �•�./,■■ • 1..)� • rs... �'1 ...r:?::{•}:•f0000°O o000�00000°00°°O f i ..'OD• } ;.., _._« .. fi. cya • 0, , j ,r1'0;{•}y;;;:•;;•:;;•}}}.,.o%00• 0• 0000000000000 _.. yP �� .11 �� � .11 ✓•000 0000000000000000000 ;l 000000000°000000°00!' ` .;:; '•], -. .-. . A �•'I A , ■■ 000000000000000°°°° :i'j �� '._•■ ■Il CI ■�' .00000' '' { 0000 00 oo,p0000000 }l ••;?•:,•';:?• ::: J.. - :„:it••• . . ■r DD°°D,r 00000°°° per , '`Y c•t r000000 iE7o &Z c oo 0000c o°oo1 ■■., �°'yrr} 1,'' Lt^ l�<•yl E•.'i ■■ ODl..; �1.�'■\"•y1 1 '•fi3 4� ` ; lioi•1• ■■I 000 P i■■■k 1` ... ��4� t ,g1'�•, y' .M.�ca. ■■�■■\ <o•��. e' r f1fiJt <",a} �. o. el • ■■ •__mum' �a c 'k b l a•r,3 rr?f�,.,• —,'r -.r•,.•�. • �:?)-txr.:1.' Co •• , �r11 JGill■■1:; �, r <. >I�^d.'V" (.>}' ■�r w CJ'!� "�>r. n 'n•� 4 ,,,<,. •ram, >;o.[+..'.�:.f[i:f:� r + c r+ C� 4+ o < f l .ill � ,o, �.�•,; sl. olio 1.�J �' �, - t .�.. - cs •O �'U•PJ c r 1, i_�c" 3' r .c, r t t• 'f' Ol 4� o a )E +[ .t p S'.iit' • • n - ,�.`• !'` r{~r1a '., "Qe�•�j g�qc - ur,�4•r. , if 3, (•. a.., " �11 ..• `�•• +n P1`•�, -101'+ e -...:.ter•t" r�t ..• gig, 6 t?`i1'.'r tttc4• 0..i.,a,;,..,T; 0•° C•�.r�v ,' r\r'r;° r4 rf • 1` Y \"t,., oo• 000, .....E• •T 4�.••�� cl c,. 'av r ,, @•Dt `t { 4'�• • "'o:�.oa•' �.�0000 \ '',r{� B, c:'c9 t,1�^.>�; Si ,3�y•,�,r,,•), ,. \,•..z Y c1[7G"J C.p� �•r.�r�r{{���rp�,�1� rP r . •,(t cP i^ ',0°00. ,1) `.• ,q.,..▪n % O 0',A• i' f, r ..• F,r•S d,1,1k', •7 r ` � L • f41 o 11 1 • oo ?'t'.,• r'rlcl`cye;•an<t', ^v..�':'`i3N' °C {, X¢yfcy_•Ter +c,F•,� 3 F�'n^ <. if . �� P �: •"' ' 'iy� ° t�^ .�C,•• ,.j; c.C�'), 3 `o oUJ s�•I;P �1 oa r'§l J , n< C i;..•S' o c ,i '-+c}>P0••'" a,tt ° r' "� '.f r. S 3s� P .Y �S f � t �, E3 r ^f •t p.�j,o 'n r�1'o)°, ,�`ld�t't•. , b,`)'.iq`o t c`t,y• )'� �rcC ,c`f, ,t`pp.. .,pr\ "Ito. °ow . T Y.:: :::::::::::: a [c 3,S �•r.01� ,:,.! eu. 00.,� `—.ef),:;l,,.. ',z'. .•,)-':3'°et `,. d'._ ^�°1`,,,,p;'^,\��t'•,..Er,... !- )( +`^ 2 r '. • V �. f•1 k�� .y �,r,"'- 3�L Li,•. a c,o p •i,q'f'; �` ;•C; , '-• I 1 ▪1 ,,, . i 4l' o 0 00` o, e, 5"r c t. .,;ov,r 93 tpc Y<j�.n ... e.,; p. .a" 'tt;it '�', •00000 ,i r' t¢• ,,.i4"4. .X., 7)..r'e�1 .� :.}::{ }ii}::?:}::}::•::::.... ..•J'•fi..:. . • 000006°0' - •nJn�1,�;' �! y� ::: .} n . , •000pr •` 1 ). '`'1.... ...r l's:C�'`�„l �y�Lln ‘ho CD { .. ...... °, "''••r)c'� , C V`'/ �.lL�o( • '�.1__--- •tY.,� r3 . •DSO ,�.." �: `` ) ' ,��": !i'+:',b ( ag +0000 •tk.� rA �,tot ,- la' t;• >�o..:tJo �� , . 000°or <<)o £d;nn e� 0 cf '!; o rl�ti ._ °0° 000 . .� �3.';:•t�;t''o;�('rr3 n f') ) • r� fe;•q'''n� � >=3 ct'u ` ot -�• ..1111 °000. 0w'^�} "•;;t;��"•�':>°r�;'.5,y1, vc?d�t�, '�jn , n1` ...::, )°o r t v000 - c )sga l• 3• ,� " FJ.�LD S�v4,•, 00 � , 00000. t rii <n, 3'; S; ' 'L^•,l�t: 000 't.: �3 t o , _ 00000 p ! cr' ;. )00 .�� F 1, �' '' 00000 tz • ' ,n as 000 ,d x:0°o 0°o:t • .` S f} n !Fv�? r :� r %`b,l,° :,i. I ';tiSJ't?,fZ o ,04';.'r �s'' 4�i�U. I� • r , • • coignq. i& d = alp r•> i„ 'il pD lvp .,14 v�> _ : LiIT !r s3r F. �� �¢z t-• ail g b s 6 ,., „,,,,,, len Fil, ba _E 04rSigi '1 0 '-‘°F. kFF rit o N„ I' g D g),R he 4 4- IT- '.' t MiiII g-Hi— -. ',-,t..vrilegg tA , t • 'O • t.TA• 4R 1 . i 4iiI i . . _1 a qUli k5' 4. $$ oto i € $ b� Fad gtit 5 ; 6 1 .,0 Go I -i- f il ,O Art, 8 p Ir ltia,-,,, : 1; E' 3 ! E ag Lt F. TO Pri ,1 °I4lifi El At a @ is -i t gvg F R 3E r o Qis E P 2 H s av i . iwxk QtiAA. I I. ' I \ftiny"---—.=:1—I , g ` I 1 x r I a' \ _t_ N. p'�iiT •PnnwNct as .cou aci - --- t' ,e % ice.- ;4 --4- .&,-.„ ,„.., I ,,,,...,....1t, ,,,, , N . . . _ ,..,), „..,.. , . • , , ., , E .\1/41 0 0 0 0 p „ , :1, 1 , , 1! . \\K.,/' + stsNit \ P s '• •fq•• :: sk\ .- of a __ oagt,`'�t.� ig �— ��. � k LAND�GAFE. FLAN tINCa FLAN _ _ gym. _ _ __. _ t * ' }` f ,a., NATIONAL PRIDE. GAR WAh�I ;¢'��6:n•!J r"t rmi ur...., p ��a�4D ,1OHA WIL- ON WC :i_i ' -u__• WASL!{1.1610N --_ rwr4q- -- .-, • ....................—........... .. . .,...................--.,— , — • . '' rf-tgx/iq'ti r ,.., , 11., 1.•;11 ;§ to. g . rtAiti, it O , • A t.< e - ri: . p 7.t,,11 ; r r• 10 0 0 t 4.1Jiti l< ik:' 4,.. 4 • a g/4.131f 0,,ei g . tIlij .4- 2 , O = i ill ri i i $ 14: f ,, • 1 .. 2 V - t i - z . _ C. .. • a z r• sa ill 1 il .‘ tit7a.- p.rr, Kso. ' . , ',re 1......0'. ( . .a. % i f I , 1 1 I tl. r . \ -. ./-_—__,. ...- \ 0%70.....d /.... ; (I . ; IA ) -',.. '' -- •-• .!'. .:iiil 7".liWa . 'iR1 RIVia.,./I 7-;1 —PSI. - .- " r .'""".' -___. 0 itt• : --7, 1 - . — 1--- v.aiiiii-diugmEl 2 lall 7 i lil i /immise.ti-ig cc.• , , \\ •,.., ,..,,,c_ „,;!..-,- i 4. • \ \ \ ' ' s.. k • / .••••-• I . a- ,----------, be... itikt" .d " . *il / 1 q " . • 1 ,,, 1 u h 1 \ 1..' `s e• '0 I'0. 4, .%). %.:. \ '• ..: ._.., i ----- l' ..---..---• .. \ r 1 / ,11: 1 0 • E111—':.1i 1 /1 ;t : • -- • . ' I 1 \..N,,,,_• i \k,!‘.414......_.... ).-\7<e' 1 N.•ss- 0 ...------ ---......., ••t" * N.‘ • • • 0 ....-- , • ' I, ,,t, ,...;:i, • •, 2 • -06------- 4-1, \ , x :._.— •.• 1 :( :, • .s.,. ., . ........ -..-• \ 1 I no 1 s . •• • lite ' 1-_,.. k . , 1„ C , 7.—..........-- -------] si j17_2.L.444, viciN11,-(t-lAp, LAG isi-. [ 1 .. • t> - rt t -•:. '' UF1Z. ; '.. i'%."(0 '' •IS., -'d '''.'--...t' ro"cm'o4.11 ro.i: ...::. ,i D1,-,. - P'-i•I:itt, :,,,',e;1'1 P.,!"...;,...,,,,;;,.r', ::41,-,., i NIA,TVN.6.1-FP.117S• 66•42 4§444 1 •,,,;4.4.,, ‘,..-.,,t.,„;4,7--,,,:o.114.,;,,w,o,. =1.111,1" i rog.. 0.10141.1 1,4,11L..e,h4 11 I'I-4.ao _ _e09../Te.9,1 li.t.6.4.41k...•119 14 9c0• n!o•Hrm•L War,- I • 49 NWM.)aN eL,Lo."•.Ygr.mA f rieTAL 4m1.Mc, _ crow A$2. WaS 4 111L: 1ii le-,.. IV-,... jg h M Y Nopf 4 45o1SiN SLR-VA 5•-o•,. o•Hc•rnt.. ova.I41Tt• • v8'.1 Lft C '>tr KiL . WqN� • o� • aN acicaWNb. .0 _E I (,�. L u pq� Hti�Thll�;cvFlNcj� ]c / NA ION D GsI2 kAS1-# \ -p n T, • _- _ _, Yg Ic-ot u C _e• 5vo°Herat_aea*'t.Fni �,— �cB oftietcb, tos•ta+) ': P I n5 N� 7. 3 iL NATILNAI-?FIDE Cps k!A - �; o • IW-ittMlL OpQ) - O 3 �JJJ y Q E I li F �'4— -_ k F z- i SST 7_t.FzYA?IcN i, ; Z %y'-I-o° ,L. • to 1. , Ne.�. \ }+o.°S No.4. ill\ hb 9• �"� r+�.c. / �.� ypp-I f ',+...x L, V r g FLAN IM; 171171 ® APPROVED e— "^ ROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED I, AZ a/re' S 7 ( A/ ? _5', o c ) ® off , /a;< A/ ---`" DATE: i/ ./P/1 SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REviSiON 5/1982 v„ ,o1 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : $1L:1)6 LII APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS La NOT APPROVED F/i L( /- AJ � 3 4 4 Su .eJ•-t, d- DATE: cP /V'))6-#.. SIGNATURE OF ECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE 63EVIV®N1 5/1882 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION ; 111 APPROVED EfirrPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED J _ 9 ‘64,1-itA,„\ JA° '6A9 <, a • • DATE: S GNATUR OF DIRECT R OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE CCVICNINU utrMtiHItNI /u1V11UN : / i // /-/=/C G/VC J /YCC / (" ' •n APPROVED [1AP•VED WITH CONDITIONS 14INOT APPROVED 1 b N E �46 —sWet - l Y a r I ve,co �sJ --� ‘all D--/-4e-- .4 0/, e_, L---)---y i7,1 D IP- b'A e- (-5L1 cl_ <- 4-- w In L 1 1 t c-` s I - -s s -t'L, -1,\ 3e, 4—4 t pw 1, 'a-{- -t ` 1-'f ` ?v- se-----1- 442- .c r„,„ , Y. +C). " ..--a av 4 a c,-- , DATE: 2 � � �7 SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1082 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : El APPROVED APPROVED WIT NDITIONS - 0 NOT APPROVED ) 'e''a e(-"i`n -% v4 lae- i' -• C:-/ Pe,---- S4. —oitx.,Ootii 4 sivit-A,i__ L.J.),ze . e..e4,..z u c„:,,e.,‘L p‘..,__. < )„ ,z_____ ..-ce-3- ZZx 34' 1' 6r -j, -,,.-e___ iitet-,1 4,______ 3) :2---Y----,-P---- -- s 6---- it/. ._r`j(- I/V,e S/ S . 0• • 1J- 7 --- �s/%- orov e ,se/Olio.Sea7v Vettd 7C , j e'Ny ,,,., , /, 1gc4 - Maio y rG�:.l wms`6 ©mod 14"4"4/1- 0 / j7.674 DATE: SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE nEviSION 5/1982 / I_ Form 182 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : 1%/I_IT ' NM./,&/ ejA10 n APPROVED J AFIROV a NOT APPROVED �._. .,, cav ,, ald ed. '-srA S . Jecr i"u t✓ t PLAN At F�` `,`:rNOVAL SUB9fCT TOJ a vi- I 'S z$/�v41(/74." - i p 014 Esc FliatMg S A6RI:EMdP:I '.SVSTE6 P (iiipmEE1 .aYE5 Igo.a4/s x gD, Dlr: = P, 603.©i ; t , °e /SPt�f;@Ail Af��E@�T A:: ...�`• .iir(d �� I # ag��9, �--0TS 2 -S SPESIA9.MOMENT 11E; . ..._"-SEtM Iim APPROVED CJATER PLAN _.;._ --,...¢r 7...a. APPROVED SEVER PLAID NO %=--c`-' APPROVED POE NYDRANT LOCATIONS ADDITION INFO REQUIRED .. 0 LEGAL DE SCRIPT IO N ;'11,% faVPAPA'• VIRE EL�:7 AP4LVSIS - Iv . ,PA 0 FOOTAGE _ _ . _ � o�-_ — - - 0:2 .7. Y' ❑ ADDRESS \ �� `" 60 T 4 Py E'OTHER ceeeEcT �r�0��0 .I Qv, ,,,,,,r-, DATE: 2 8� /g SIGNATURE 0! DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE PROVED ❑ ;.'"ROVED WITH CONDITIONS OD NOT APPROVED SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVEATE: REVISION E5/1982 Form 182 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION ° RKS DAPPROVED -APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS EINOT APPROVED FX*Nt'Ve- tt Azdrtn) ,c : ce_csa 14.01147 oum_2(e),,,,f , e4Avt„uric 6,9\ ty (tr-el CerrA ejt. .41.C1104i • DATE: SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 8/1982 • OF I 0 • • ao :15 . O BU L 19NG ZON NG DEPARTMENT RONALD C. NELSON - DIRECTOR 2e, rn O MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 p 235-2540 90 co. 0 co SEP11- BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR DATE: March 3, 1986 TO: Fred J. Kaufman, Hearing Examiner FROM: Environmental Review Committee SUBJECT: JOHN S. WILSON/SELF-SERVICE CAR WASH/SITE PLAN APPROVAL SA-008-86 The Environmental Review Committee has analyzed the additional information submitted by Mr. John S. Wilson on February 25, 1986 for National Pride Car Wash. The Environmental Review Committee finds the following: • 1. That the proposed use is an appropriate use allowed in the B-I. Business • Use, zoning classification and has some limitations which are necessary to modify the site plan as a result of the car wash activity. 2. That the site plan as submitted creates the potential for motor vehicle traffic to circumvent the traffic signal that will be installed at Jefferson Avenue N.E. and N.E. Third Street. 3. The present alignment of N.E. Third Street and the proposed western-most access along with the associated speeds allowed on N.E. Third Street creates a line of site problem for access at that particular location. 1 4. The subject site is immediately adjacent to an established multiple family residential site. The dissimilarity in uses and hours of occupancy and operation create the need for a stronger separation of uses. Therefore, the Environmental Review Committee under their substitive authority [Section 4-2822(D)] recommends to the decision maker, the Hearing Examiner, that the site approval request to allow the construction of a self-service car wash on a .92 acre is subject to the following conditions: 1. The elimination of the western-most curb cut onto N.E. Third Street. . 2. The increasing of the landscape buffer adjacent to the residential units along the northern half of the western property line. The landscaped area should be increased to a minimum of 10 feet with landscaping material at least 4 feet in height at the time of installation. Under Section 4-2822(D), the decision maker must accept these conditions as binding upon his ultimate decision unless he identifies in writing a substantial error in fact or conclusion by the Environmental Review Committee. The decision maker then has the option of asking the Environmental Review Committee for reconsideration for revising the recommended conditions. The applicant also has the ability to request for reconsideration of these conditions from the Environmental Review Committee or appeal these conditions directly to the Hearing Examiner under authority granted in Section 4-2823(A)(1)(a) within 14 days of the date that'the DNS is final. Therefore, the appeal date would be Monday, March 17, 1986, at 5 p.m. Appeals must be submitted in the form prescribed by both the Environmental Ordinance of the City of Renton and the Hearing Examiner Ordinance, Section 4-3011(B). RJB:ss 1052N cc: John S. Wilson 14124 177th N.E. Redmond, Washington 98052 ' . .i .+ v.c.tF nu m>i•tC"'.+ftt]=.K'iL't'.y V:c.v[4Lr-n.I.;SUM"N/>JfS<`.ti'r. .s.e+it^'.`LL'T•;]Rt�St•y,•�Y1Vr`til3y`.-.+ `ii�"ilMC1R't, TU'.Y1•�4+..`a,znrn.T.�W.+ri:.ct'w;tt'^s?li:lAs'}3:':tz'��`R ' r © 1• • 1049N CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST NO.: ECF-008-86 APPLICATION NO(s).: SA-009-86 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Application for site plan approval to build a self-serve car wash. PROPONENT: John S. Wilson (National Pride Car Wash) LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Property located between N.E. Third Street and N.E. Fourth Street on Jefferson Avenue N.E. LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton, Building and Zoning Department. The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse Impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other Information on file with the lead agency. This Information is available to the public on request. Additional conditions were imposed as mitigating measures by the Environmental Review Committee under their authority of Section 4-2822(D) Renton Municipal Code. Retponsible Official: Environmental Review Committee City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055 Phone: 235-2550 APPEAL: You may appeal this determination in writing to Renton Hearing Examiner no later than March 170 1986. You should be prepared to make specific factual objections. Contact City of Renton, Building and Zoning Department to read or ask about the procedures for SEPA appeals. DATE OF DECISION: February 26, 1986 PUBLICATION DATE: March 3, 1986 Ronald G. Nelson y '�'. ' ger Building and Zoning Director Policy De pme irector R chard C. oughton Public Works Director 0 OF RA, ° BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT u RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR 0 "'0 �� MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 O 235-2540 • 0,9gr�D TES®.P SEP BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR • March 17. 1986 John S. Wilson 14124 177th N.E. Redmond, WA 98052 Re: Site Plan Approval Application for Car Wash Facility, file SA-008-86: property located between N.E. 3rd St. and N.E. 4th St. near Jefferson Ave. N.E. Dear Mr. Wilson: The City of Renton Building and Zoning Department formally accepted the above mentioned application on January 29, 1986. A public hearing before the City of Renton Land Use Hearing Examiner has been scheduled for March 25, 1986. The public hearing commences at 9:00 a.m. in the Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall. The applicant or representative(s) of the applicant is required to be present at the public hearing. A copy of the staff report will be mailed to you before the hearing. If you have any questions, please call the Building and Zoning Department at 235-2550. Sincerely, V0-$4e, 6tie Roger J. Blaylock Zoning Administrator RJB:JMM:wr 2282Z 2275Z I) • NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON HEARING EXAMINER RENTON, WASHINGTON A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS ON THE SECOND FLOOR OF CITY HALL, RENTON, WASHINGTON ON MARCH 25, 1986, AT 9:00 A.M. TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS: JOHN S. WILSON (NATIONAL PRIDE CAR WASH) Application for site plan approval to build a self-service car wash, file SA-008-86: property located between N.E. Third Street and N.E. Fourth Street near Jefferson Avenue N.E. Legal descriptions of the files noted above are on file in the Renton Building and Zoning Department. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT THE PUBLIC HEARING ON MARCH 25, 1986, AT 9:00 A.M. TO EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS. PUBLISHED : March 17, 1986 Ronald G. Nelson Building and Zoning Director CERTIFICATION I. JEANETTE SAMEK-MC KAGUE, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THREE COPIES OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENTS WERE POSTED BY ME IN THREE CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED ABOVE AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW. ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me. a Notary Public, in and for the State of Washington residing in R . a) , on the 1-2 UI day of March, 1986. n 10 .e ASo-ao , SIGNED: 7rletir_ • RENT^i BUILDING & ZONING DEP - rMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 008-86- APPLICATION NO(S) : SA 008-86 •.i... PROPONENT ; JOHN S. WILSON , PROJECT TITLE ; BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION. FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO BUILD A SELF-SERVICE CAR WASH FACILITY ON 0.92 ACRE SITE. • LOCATION : PROJECT LOCATED BETWEEN NE 3rd ST AND NE 4th st, 131.34 FEET WEST'OF JEFFERSON AV NE TO: DPUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT .j SCHEDULED ERC DATE : ENGINEERING DIVISION • 1:=ITRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : DUTILITIES ENG , DIVISION 0 FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU OPARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT El BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT NPOLICE DEPARTMENT OPOLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT [10THERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P .M. ON � REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION ; APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED :1-23 a/Ley-7 DATE, //�� SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 RENT"M BUILDING & ZONING DEPA'TMAENT - y DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET. ECF - 008-86- APPLICATION NO(S) : SA 008-86 PROPONENT : JOHN S. WILSON PROJECT TITLE ; BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF. PROJECT: APPLICATION. FOR SITE PLAN.APPROVAL .TO BUILD A •SELF-SERVICE CAR WASH FACILITY ON 0.92 ACRE SITE. 1 LOCATION : PROJECT LOCATED BETWEEN NTH 3rd ST ++AND NE 4th st, 131.34 FEET WEST'OF JEFFERSON AV NE . i TO: JJ PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT i j SCHEDULED ERC DATE : [=1 ENGINEERING DIVISION • flTRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : El UTILITIES . ENG . DIVISION EIFIRE PREVENTION BUREAU El PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT [' POLICE DEPARTMENT • POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT OOTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE , COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P .M. ON REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : /%ems ?���i-• [' APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED /, /WA"TX ...0E "Mg/ AJ.E.E_c• 7-Al-aF" 09-7-/;•11 o• ANTILE ,edr,l 0 C A 470A, AtYa 1. frRJo .0 0c,p-T/e415 0 yp�q�v7=s' A/ E. 'v Ze S T C Ab T SWo cv,� o'.%) s/�. �C,Q.v • DATE: /g41.4 SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 / rtiVin/77,1'7 `•c-/,/- t._ `• locej - 1 . HAZARD IDENTIFICATION INFOR TION • ' NAME /Uata71d/ Aerie l/1 4C OaS% - U.B.C. CLASS OF BUILD_-2 ADDRESS /01E 3fej 9! Ai(P` - FIRE MANAGEMENT AREA 2. DETERMINE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION - CLASS (CIRCLE ONE) : I - II IV II.I V FIRE-RESISTIVE NON-COMBUSTIBLE ORDINARY WOOD FRAME MIXED (Note: If "Mixed", see Special Instructions for Area and Basic Fire Flow) 3. DETERMINE AREA: GROUND FLOOR AREA: 3,7Z ft2 NUMBER OF STORIES: x ` ' 4 TOTAL BUILDING AREA: 3,7G ft2(A) 4. DETERMINE BASIC FIRE FLOW FROM TABLE #1 , USING AREA (A) : /99 9 GPM (B) 5. DETERMINE OCCUPANCY FACTOR ADJUSTMENT: ADJUSTMENT: 49 — GPM (C) If low Hazard, Subtract up to 25% of (B) ; If High Hazard, Add up to 25% of (B). 6. COMPUTE SUB-TOTAL (B+C).: , /0 04P GPM (D) (If B+C is less than 500 GPM, insert 500 GPM) 7. DETERMINE SPRINKLER ADJUSTMENT: ADJUSTMENT: GPM (E) (If completely sprinklered, subtract up to 50% of (0) ; If light hazard occupancy and fire resistive or non-combustible construction, subtract up to 75% of (D). ) . 8. DETERMINE EXPOSURE ADJUSTMENT: Using the table at left as a guide, enter the separation and adjustment for each. of the "four faces" of the building in the table at the right: SEPARATION MAX. ADJUSTMENT EXPOSURE SEPARATION ACT. ADJUSTMENT. 0 - 10 25% max. North /Sa -I Add 0 % 11 - 30 20% max. East 40 ' Add / % 31 - 60 15% max. South 3 / Add f/p % 61 - 100 10% max. West • Add /5 % 101 - 150 5% max. Total % of Adjustment 150 or 4-hr wall 0% max. (not to exceed 75%) : 60 % (Total % adjustment times (D)) ADJUSTMENT: 90D GPM (F) 9. DETERMINE ROOF COVERING ADJUSTMENT: (If wood shingle roof covering, add 500 GPM) ADJUSTMENT: ---e:,— GPM (G) 10. COMPUTE ESTIMATED FIRE FLOW REQUIRED: /4/D 0 (If D+E+F+G is less than 500 GPM, insert 500 GPM. ) (If D+E+F+G is greater than 12,000 GPM, insert 12,000 GPM. ) (D+E+F+ ) REQUIRED FIRE FLOW: / ,0 GPM (H) \ - 11 . SIGNED: 4444' DATE: -- 1//- ir REV BUILDING & ZONING DEP MENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF — 008-86- APPLICATION NO(S) : SA 008-86 PROPONENT: JOHN S. WILSON PROJECT TITLE : BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION. FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO. BUILD A SELF-SERVICE CAR WASH FACILITY ON 0.92 ACRE SITE. ; LOCATION : PROJECT LOCATED BETWEEN NE 3rd ST AND NE 4th st, 131.34 FEET WEST'OF JEFFERSON AV NE I • TO: 0 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 0 ENGINEERING DIVISION EI TRAFFIC ENG . DIVISION ' SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : El UTILITIES ENG . DIVISION 0 FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU • PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT Ei POLICE DEPARTMENT ▪ POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P .M. ON REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : $LD6 OAPPROVED OAPPROVED WITH CONDITIONS EINOT APPROVED fit- t/h — F,9 1—. Y � uf� , cc 0/ 4 „6/4g cJC cD u e dr--J a iu Pad i � Go,z-J 6 /6/0-4Lv_g_ DATE: 42 / 7TURE OF ECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 " RENTdBUILDING & ZONING DEPAOMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 008-86_ CITlI OF REINITON APPLICATION NO(S) : SA 008-86 EB 6 1986 PROPONENT : JOHN S. WILSON POLICY DFVFLOPMFt+!T (WPT. PROJECT TITLE ; I I BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN.APPROVAL TO BUILD A SELF-SERVICE CAR WASH FACILITY ON 0.92 ACRE SITE. LOCATION ; PROJECT LOCATED BETWEEN NE 3rd ST AND NE 4th st, 131.34 FEET WEST.OF JEFFERSON AV NE TO : 0 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : El ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : El UTILITIES ENG . DIVISION 0 FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT ® BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT OPOLICE DEPARTMENT ® POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT OTHERS ; COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS T. THE BUILDING- & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P .M. ON. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION ; POLICY 666/gL OPMe/sCr"` APPROVED IPIrPROVED WITH CONDITIONS 0 NOT APPROVED fr(61 AsiA2.)6614-64 , 4.4 - /,9 pa."-Leitifur:Ai,u2,4aci&-di OF A4-4c--4-44A-it-f-•4-4-1 DATE; S G , TUR DIRECTuR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 • ' RENTc$BUILDING & ZONING DEPAWIENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 008-86- APPLICATION NO(S) : SA 008-86 PROPONENT: JOHN S. WILSON PROJECT TITLE : BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF. PROJECT: APPLICATION. FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL To BUILD A SELF-SERVICE CAR WASH FACILITY ON 0.92 ACRE SITE. • LOCATION : PROJECT LOCATED BETWEEN NE 3rd STAND NE 4th st, 131.34 FEET WEST.'OF JEFFERSON AV NE I i • TO: i I r-1 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 1 SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 0 ENGINEERING DIVISION[7 TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION ; SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : E 1UTILITIES ENG . DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU fl PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT 0 POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT El OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING . PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P .M. ON REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : 7 j I / ic ENG / lt(G flAPP ROVED flAPPROVEDW ITH CONDITIONS /IZNOT APPROVED N E 5fb -- l(13 d Y I Ve U)c �L -�. t t7 ems` L J t "S ! 5 S to �.ln ?� - ' • d toi _ \('c7 �S J � ✓� Wit./ " l� v e 5 e- o o �" •-�-o- „ ,E. 3 �� 5�_ ��Y e 4 c DATE: "7//1 --e//§)e5 SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTZED REPRES ENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 r , , - RENTZ BUILDING & ZONING DEP MENT ' IIIF DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 008-86- i , ' APPLICATION NO(S) : •SA 008-86 PROPONENT: JOHN S. WILSON , PROJECT TITLE ; BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT., APPLICATSON. FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL VO BUILD A SELF-SERVTP • CAR WASH FACILITY ON 0.92 ACRE SITE. I LOCATION ; PROJECT LOCATED BETWEEN NE 3rd ST AND NE 4th st, 131.34 FEET WEST OF JEFFERSON AV NE • TO : PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT i ' I SCHEDULED ERC DATE : ENGINEERING DIVISION Ili TRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION ; SCHEDULED HEARING DATE ; • ❑ UTILITIES ENG . DIVISION 0 FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU Ei PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT 0 BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT OPOLICE DEPARTMENT Ei POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 1 ; El OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS _APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P .M. ON . • REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION ; El APPROVED APPROVED WIT NDITIONS 0 NOT APPROVED ) P1`le"t -s / A 4,,• S4. 72xx)601,1 . ' V . v,• -w r_az-4..---et-,,-— .s e_z,.d_ ..c., p' lam_ a'Z ,3 '' 3) or Y-j ,� ' -Cr sr- C*FC(72,(___c;3 7/ 2-/'/le‘ , - _: P, ® Qrase/id'S0kel rAqip eiov.rt.e1) „' V 4~� 5NV� /p ISM p �v�1.c> J��GC� N�.u� Cv Dax10,-.2 /44- w(,r . ����,, ?r� mow/ het, IEtx,Nt(cQ¢bi/a� o /h?:(1'0 C� yq7-6743 . DATE; `SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 RENTel BUILDING & ZONING DEP TMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 008-86- APPLICATION NO(S) : SA 008-86 PROPONENT: JOHN S. WILSON PROJECT TITLE ; BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF. PROJECT: APPLICATION. FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO BUILD A SELF-SERVICE CAR WASH FACILITY ON 0.92 ACRE S"ITE. I • LOCATION : PROJECT LOCATED BETWEEN NE 3rd ST AND NE 4th st, 131.34 FEET WEST'OF JEFFERSON AV NE • TO: ❑ PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT i SCHEDULED ERC DATE : El ENGINEERING DIVISION . flTRAFFIC ENG . DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE ; UTILITIES ENG . DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU El PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT EI BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT El POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 00THERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P .M. ON REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION ; l/7ii_ ry .ENP/n/, EjniCa APPROVED ❑ A ROV -TH CUND-I9 NOT APPROVED CRy gess oN 14.3 3)1 ST. fI1NJir VAL SUBJECT TO / a - �u3`k-c` T� W�eT�i� d f5 od- I93 a'� S?s'4 x/74. I F. 0�4 t u(WO LATE HERS ACREEMEIIT '0. LATE COMERS ABREEmEE, Mo 1 SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT�' � YES 64 U x 414 DOS*. = 1, 6 03.0/ 4%tik 'P-( , , SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT YES / 0,3 D/ S� 1 SPECIAL ASSESSMENT Al i, -Ga;�TE NO , �3, Z O .O Z 1-P t'S 3 SPECIAL ASSESSMENT ARE:: ;?:f.:: "-SEWER go y APPROVED WATER PLAN e, (sF sp-` Aybmmt 4462(edeo) APPROVED SEWER PLAN NO APPROVED FIRE HYDRANT LOCATIONS ADDITION INFO REQUIRED BY ❑ LEGAL DESCRIPTION FIRE She'd AN•LYSIS Ido ID SQUARE FOOTAGE 31 �' •j9'OTH CI ADDRESS ' ? 6 c( Trq.;� y ER co,cercj- L'A'l.Ncio ` t DATE: 2/ e /gip SIGNATURE 0 DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 • RENT-11 BUILDING & ZONING DEP_ 'MENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 008-86- APPLICATION NO(S) ; SA 008-86 PROPONENT: JOHN S. WILSON PROJECT TITLE ; BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION. FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO BUILD A SELF-SERVICE CAR WASH FACILITY ON 0.92 ACRE SITE. ] LOCATION : PROJECT LOCATEDBETWEEN NE 3rd STAND NE 4th st, 131.34 FEET WEST.'OF JEFFERSON AV NE TO: LI PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : LI ENGINEERING DIVISION . flTRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : UTILITIES ENG . DIVISION El FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU ® PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT El BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT LI POLICE DEPARTMENT [=1 POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING . PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P .M. ON REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION ; ( RAC A 2241? APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED SC-kin/we- 14-1-te(teN) air\ 14,61:17 a1ov-Aor tovt A4NA. .J t v, L A Aoki-Cy J ccAect ctOtziS N�. 1c4, S't .t SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVEATE; REVISION 5/1982 OF .?, 0 ,,,:.;r:.:4..7;:-'., • 0 tro ,c0- , z „-..,', ,, a a,'2 i ,,, '" ; ,,. . .. .; , , • .'. in& , 1 § ,..,; ; ''r.s;.''',1, .' ';.,' "". ,2,;• ._ ., ... ',, „';''s ..3 .. . 411.eo sEP1' .•z City of Renton Land Use Hearing Examiner will hold a ,-,-,',, ,., rz, ,.: r 7,•.?'. ,,, f ,:-. ..d., , 44: ,, , 4 : ,, . , . . „( . ' ' , •,` a,,i ,;`, ,:' ;,'!, ,,,,, ;: •;a,,,!•, .: a, -,;;-1,,a.; 'a.,:-.4. -e..A. ...,'''i ' . ...'' . .71'%' .," 7' i t., ..'")' . , ' 1'; ':,,.' ": .;. !:"J::.! ''''. ''';:''''' il. 1:' .."'4' % :0.,: gl'ltr,. ' ' (1:. '" r ;:r') r','"L".`i r' • ''.. ' '' . "., ::;':'' ';• %,' ,;,,7i ''''' ' . ,, : f,',.. ' , ' .-v. . ,,,, , ,.,„ 11... ., , ,,,:''.4 I.f. • :',,' „'** ',"",:*:.„f'', ''',, 1 , ,,,5',4,,,,! , ",,... ';‘,"4" ;1% • 5.1 ,4 ,;" ,41!,., • ''' 'i;''',f, f '‘ ' ", "t.: . • . . '' '."4 . - *.**4' f''' '1.';'''. ;• ,', r p., ; •4. in CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS , CITY HALL ON MARCH 23, 1986 BEGINNING AT 9 :0fL_A.M. _ P.M. C:liNCERNIING: . i 1 1 it20.,. :;.E Fro7-:11. ... I ! SPECIAL / CONDITI*141. USE PERMIT To • JOHN S. WILSON (NATIONAL PRIDE CAR WASH) x SITE APPRivo' AL TO BUILD A SELF—SERVICE CAR WASH FILE SA-00(8-86 H RT .tili'L.*:. ',.', - ,0,1 .ii. ,i, lc DIV1 ,t-f:-1 :0;N of I Lots P;',. .,,,,ii :Ii -Ei,. ...'*:. 1',. '4:.; I k:: 11 I:::VEL PMENT LI V ri, cio, 1 L F' ,' E -, , ri ., .• - t -.., ,, r-] GENERAL LlisCATION AND/OR ADDRESS: PROPERTY LOCATED BETWEEN N.E. THIRD STREET AND N .E. FOURTH STREET NEAR JEFFERSON AVENUE N.E. LEGAL DESCRIPTION ON FILE IN'THE RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT. ., ., ,, EL, :, VI.,,:. .'.:. *: „ .:!.METAL lit- EC IL ARAT ION 0 SIGNIFICANT ONON...SIGNIFICANT FOR FURTHER !INFORMATION CALL, THE CITY OF RENTON,,, BUILDING&ZONING DEPARTMENT 235-2550 THIS NOTICE NOT TO BE REMOVED ' WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION • ,O F I A. %$ .. ° BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT �dl RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR z o 09 0 co� MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH.98055 o 235-2540 Ao9�rF0 SEPS�• • ��P BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR MEMORANDUM DATE: March 3, 1986 TO: Fred J. Kaufman, Hearing Examiner FROM: Environmental Review Committee SUBJECT: JOHN S. WILSON/SELF-SERVICE CAR WASH/SITE PLAN APPROVAL SA-008-86 The Environmental Review Committee has analyzed the additional information submitted by Mr. John S. Wilson on February 25, 1986 for National Pride Car Wash. The Environmental Review Committee finds the following: 1. That the proposed use is an appropriate use allowed in the B=1, Business • Use, zoning classification and has some limitations which are necessary to modify the site plan as.a result of the car wash activity. 2. That the site plan as submitted creates the potential for motor vehicle traffic to circumvent the traffic signal that will be installed at Jefferson Avenue N.E. and N.E. Third Street. 3. The present alignment of N.E. Third Street and the proposed western-most access along with the associated speeds allowed on N.E. Third Street creates a line of site problem for access at that particular location. 4. The subject site is immediately adjacent to an established multiple family residential site. The dissimilarity in uses and hours of occupancy and operation create the need for a stronger separation of uses. Therefore, the Environmental Review Committee under their substitive authority [Section 4-2822(D)] recommends to the decision maker, the Hearing Examiner, that the site approval request to allow the construction .of a self-service car wash on a .92 acre is subject to the following conditions: 1. The elimination of the western-most curb cut onto N.E. Third Street. 2. The increasing of the landscape buffer adjacent to the residential units along the northern half of the western property line. The landscaped area should be increased to a minimum of 10 feet with landscaping material at least 4 feet in height at the time of installation. • • Fred J. Kaufman March 3, 1986 Page 2 Under Section 4-2822(D), the decision maker must accept these conditions as binding upon his ultimate decision unless he identifies in writing a substantial error in fact or conclusion by the Environmental Review Committee. The decision maker then has the option of asking the Environmental Review Committee for reconsideration for revising the recommended conditions. The applicant also has the ability to request for reconsideration of these conditions from the Environmental Review Committee or appeal these conditions directly to the Hearing Examiner under authority granted in Section 4-2823(A)(1)(a) within 14 days of the date that the DNS is final. Therefore. the appeal date would be Monday, March 17, 1986, at 5 p.m. Appeals must be submitted in the form prescribed by both the Environmental Ordinance of the City of Renton and the Hearing Examiner Ordinance, Section 4-3011(B). RJB:ss 1052N cc: John S. Wilson 14124 177th N.E. Redmond, Washington 98052 • h 4 ha.‘g •.�t;�a:, y a'�{ `�..-�d�fr�9 4 �f ,.".��� a a �f w .e`"�in..n � e_, �_ ,. .+* n. ..- . • 1049N CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST NO.: ECF-008-86 APPLICATION NO(s).: SA-009-86 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Application for site plan approval to build a self-serve car wash. PROPONENT: John S. Wilson (National Pride Car Wash) LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Property located between N.E. Third Street and N.E. Fourth Street on Jefferson Avenue N.E. LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton, Building and Zoning Department. The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. Additional conditions were imposed as mitigating measures by the Environmental Review Committee under their authority of Section 4-2822(D) Renton Municipal Code. Retponsible Official: Environmental Review Committee City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055 Phone: 235-2550 APPEAL: You may appeal this determination in writing to Renton Hearing Examiner no later than March 17, 1986. You should be prepared to make specific factual objections. Contact City of Renton, Building and Zoning Department to read or ask about the procedures for SEPA appeals. DATE OF DECISION: February 26, 1986 PUBLICATION DATE: March 3, 1986 /1/11114, AIL AI Ronald G. Nelson . y r. • ger Building and Zoning Director Policy De s pme irector R chard C. oughton Public Works Director 1050N NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTON • The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a declaration of non-significance for the following projects with additional conditions imposed as mitigating measures under their authority of Section 4-2822(D) of the Renton Municipal Code: JOHN S. WILSON (NATIONAL PRIDE CAR WASH) (ECF-008-86) Application for site plan approval to build a self-serve car wash (file SA-009-86). Property located between N.E. Third Street and N.E. Fourth Street on Jefferson Avenue N.E. Further information regarding this .action is available in the Building .and Zoning Department, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington, 235-2550. Any appeal of ERC action must be filed with the Renton Hearing Examiner by March 17, 1986. Published: March 3, 1986 • FORM 115 i s NOTIC jx ^flx""uR9A1.tlpe'.^y ENviRoNmE . DECLARATI I s • APPLICATION NO. ECF-008--86 PROPOSED ACTION APPLICATION FOR SITE PI AN APPROVAI TO BlllI D A SELF - SERVICE CAR WASH FILE #SA-009-86 GENERAL LOCATION AND DR. ADDRESS BETWEEN N,E, THIRD STREET AND N .E. FOURTH STREET ON JEFFERSON AVENUE N , E1 POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTE • PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE C E.R.C.) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION ❑DOES -®ODES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT DWILL ®WILL, NOT BE REQUIRED. THE CITY OF RENTON WILL NOT ACT ON THIS PROPOSAL FOR 15 DAYS FROM THE DATE BELOW. COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY MARCH 11. NM AN APPEAL OF THEE� ABOVE DETERMINATION MAY BE FILED WITH. MARCH RANTON HEARING EXAMINER BY 5:00 P.M., 96 • FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON • BUILDING S. ZONING DEPARTMENT 235-2550 DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION r 1 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET , REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: ) T ,I L. 9 7 if (-=-- DATE CIRCULATED: FEBRUARY. 6, 1986 I COMMENTS DUE: FEBRUARX 13, 1986 ECF - 008-86. APPLICATION NO(s). SA 008-86 PROPONENT: JOHN S. WILSON PROJECT TITLE: NATIONAL P IDE CAR WASH . BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR STTE PTAN APPROVAL TO BUILD A SELF-SERVICI CA$ WASH FACILITY ON 0.92 ACRE SITE 1 LOCATION: PROJECT LOCATED BETWEEN NE 3rd 'ST AND NE 4th ST, 131,34 FEET WEST OF JEFFERSON AVE NE II! SITE AREA: \,O/92 ACRES B!lILDING AREA (gross): 3,976 IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS ADEQUATE INADEQUATE 1) Earth 'I 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources! iI 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 'I 11) Light and Glare !I 12) Recreation i! 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services I 16) Utilities V' COMMENTS: 72a3 RECOMMENDATION: DNSAO ® MITIGATED DNS n EIS REVIEWED BY: ri % TITLE: 07M/72/ rEiCi. /1(/,E /AJCc DATE: .'/ 23 / `SLD • FORM #14 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET ��en�3n Rrc Dept 11 1 Fue F :en'icn L_�rz S_st �.�►�;f REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: �'� � � iL) DATE CIRCULATED: FEBRUARY. 6, 1986 COMMENTS DUE: FEBRUARY 13. 1986 ECF - 008-86. APPLICATION NO(s). SA 008-86 I MEE PROPONENT: JOHN S. WILSON _ PROJECT TITLE: TIO P DE W � BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLTCATION FOR STTF PLAN APPROVAT, TO RTTTLT) A SELF—SERVIC1 CAR WASH FACILITY ON 0799 .➢CRF SITE I LOCATION: PROJECT LOCATED BETWEEN NE •3rdST AND NE 4th ST, 131,34 FEET WEST OF JEFFERSON AVE NE SITE AREA: \ 0,192 ACRES . • BUILDING AREA (gross): 3,976 IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS I ADEQUATE INADEQUATE 1) Earth • 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals � II' 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use I' 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation �� 14) Transportation 15) Public Services ' 16) Utilities i COMMENTS: • 1 • • RECOMMENDATION: EaliTgr [] MITIGATED DNS n . EIS REVIEWED BY: 'I&*., TITLE: ' iA /YIA.etrA/A7 e DATE: Cog• /j /?IS FORM ##14 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: 0 L I.C_X 1 1)G--Uu.Of° /14 'GOT- . DATE CIRCULATED: ARY. 1 FEBRU 6, 1986 I COMMENTS DUE: FEBRUARY 13. 1 6 _ ECF - 008-86. i CITY OF RED M ON APPLICATION NO(s). SA 008-86 i' , 8 6 1986 • PROPONENT: JOHN S. WILSON POLICY DFvEI.DOME rktT c1F1)T. PROJECT TITLE: III NATIONAL PRIDE. CAR WASH,. . BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPT.TCATIQN FOR STT) PLAN APPROVAL TO BUILD A SF,T.F—SERVICE CAR WASH FACIT,TTY ON 0.92 ACRE SITE u .. j LOCATION: PROJECT LOCATED BETWEEN NE •3rdIi6T AND NE 4th ST, 13434• FEET WEST OF JEFFERSON i AVE NE SITE AREA: "0/92 ACRES • . BUILDING AREA. (gross): 3,976 ;I IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS ADEQUATE INADEQUATE 1) Earth I • 2) Air 3) Water h 4) Plants r 5) Animals i',' 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics �. 11) Light and Glare I 12) Recreation i 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation i' 14) Transportation 1 I' 15) Public Services 16) Utilities i. COMMENTS: 111 e*Jai6tIpeoge.44.4P, z.;1.) 40-mfro,deld)Hq •64,exie:e4:11,10j e 74 a ` I/ . initet.tal, a/ w ` . 754, fro i i 1 ,/ , , . . , _. _ 1 ,. e014 64 .t.e.„4...., - e-,:te 4e , , :i - /. �- s fr"etigl-4 Gc"jsii&d.u24.0 RECOMMENDATION: DNS El MITIGATED DNS El EIS REVIEWED BY: Ue tillLeal.5Ow TITLE: AS...5i,54,41- 0-stet e- DATE: gl///$6 FORM #14 0 1 0 ,,, ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET i REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: j I . DATE CIRCULATED: FEBRUARY. 6. 1986 1 COMMENTS DUE: 'EBRUARY 13. 1986 ECF - 008-86- f — APPLICATION NO(s). SA 008-8, , PROPONENT: JOHN S. WILSO& PROJECT TITLE: NATIONAL PRIDE CAR WAS - . BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR STT) PLAN APPROVAL TO BUILD A SELF=SERVICE CAR WASH FACILITY ON 0.92 •ACRE SITE LOCATION: PROJECT LOCATED BETWEEN NE -3rd1ST AND NE 4th ST, 131,•34 FEET WEST OF JEFFERSON AVE NE SITE AREA: ` 0/92 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross): 3,976 r 0 IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS ADEQUATE INADEQUATE 1) Earth (./ 2) Air 1✓ . 3) Water 4) Plants c./ 5) Animals ,✓ 6) Energy and Natural Resources ✓ 7) Environmental Health � L✓ 8) Land and Shoreline Use ! ,✓ 9) Housing ,✓ 10) Aesthetics , ✓ 11) Light and Glare ✓ 12) Recreation v/ 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation ✓ 14) Transportation ✓ 15) Public Services L✓ 16) Utilities COMMENTS: L— , • � D„,,dry,A1 fir -uiet--,• 10 , • • RECOMMENDATION: DNS [D MITIGATED DNS n EIS REVIEWED BY: TITLE: G' y DATE: �// FORM 1#14 410 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: .-re/1• DATE CIRCULATED: FEBRUARY. 6, 1986 COMMENTS DUE: FEBRUARY 13. 1986 ECF - 008-86. APPLICATION NO(s). SA 008-8, • PROPONENT: JOHN S. WILSON PROJECT TITLE: NATIONAL.PP.IDE CAR BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: ApPT,TCATION FOR SITP PLAN APPROVAL TO BUILD A SELF-SERVIC] CAR WASH FACTLTTY ON 0_92 P: RF, STTF LOCATION: PROJECT LOCATED BETWEEN NE •3rdST AND NE 4th ST, 131,.34. FEET WEST OF JEFFERSON AVE NE • SITE AREA: \0/92-ACRES • BUILDING AREA. (gross): 3.976 . IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS ADEQUATE INADEQUATE 1) Earth ! f/ 2) Air I' 3) Water • 4) Plants z/ 5) Animals II 6) Energy and Natural ResoLrces 7) Environmental' Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing ! v 10) Aesthetics • • 11) Light and Glare v 12) Recreation r� 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 1 , 16) Utilities ! C/ COMMENTS: !. '4-)-I - C fit. c v L z - -P - L* • te....).cri (12ye_ rop s L-04.0 I .A 1 1.CO 4 v- S ' ,• � ` -to: E 7?-4-'4/..f(71'1O A.16 I'Llj67b • RECOMMENDATION: DNS 0 MITIGATED DNS n EIS REVIEWED BY: ITLE: DATE: -A/p • FORM #14 S . ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: DATE CIRCULATED: FEBRUARY. 6, 198I6 i COMMENTS DUE: FEBRUARY 13. 1986 ECF - 008-86- • APPLICATION NO(s). SA 008-86 1 PROPONENT: JOHN s. WILSON it PROJECT TITLE: •NATIONAL PRIDE .^,AR WAS ' .li BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: • ' APPLTCAT*N FOR STTF PLAN APPROVAL TO BUILD A SELF-SERVICE CAR WASH FACILTTY ON 0.92 ACRE STTE • I. • LOCATION: PROJECT LOCATED BEITWEEN NE -3rdST AND NE 4th ST, 131,-34• FEET. WEST OF JEFFERSON AVE NE SITE AREA: ` 0/92 ACRES . BUILDING AREA. (gross): 3,976 IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEI NTS ADEQUATE INADEQUATE 1) Earth 2) Air ,------ 3) Water • i, —~ 4) Plants / 5) Animals i. 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health i, 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing r� 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation i 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation i 15) Public Services v 16) Utilities , COMMENTS: /hoar 7,e)ro, /5 Al o o..ni Gtivis , ./6/c T G,d-az j ti �S 79-g-c/a- + ti P- - cl I wT A /6 A)/F‘•c-,J,.P-- 67ct PC,, g 4../.g-1:) �.� ai 'CP. -5.- -- - ,Z 00s 6js . �� �s s .sou ��— , oe—e oLot, 7 7 • RECOMMENDATION: Q DNS [] MITIGATED DNS E] EIS REVIEWED BY: C . c 1 i;L'CA'�7s TITLE: - DATE: 2 —/ 96 • FORM 1#14 . _ I ENVIRONMENTAL CHE( LIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: FO L d C ' DATE CIRCULATED: FEBRUARY. 6, 1986 i COMMENTS DUE: FEBRUARY 13, 1986 ECF - 008-86. APPLICATION NO(s). SA 008-86 PROPONENT: JOHN S. WILSON 1' PROJECT TITLE: NATIONAL.PRIDE CAR WASH' BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLTCATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL- TO BUILD A SELF-SERVICI CAR WASH FACTLTTY ON 0.92 ACRE STTF I LOCATION: PROJECT LOCATED BETWEENNE •3rd S.T AND NE 4th ST, 131,34 FEET WEST OF JEFFERSON AVE NE 1 1 SITE AREA: \ 0/92 ACRES . . BUILDING AREA. (gross): 3,976 IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS ' ADEQUATE INADEQUATE 1) Earth 2) Air ! ' 3) Water 4) Plants j ;; 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health i' 8) Land and Shoreline Use , 9) Housing j! • i 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation ' 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 1 11 16) Utilities COMMENTS: l 1 1 RECOMMENDATION:Iii DNS [� MITIGATED DNS El EIS REVIEWS -rt�i� TITLE: ' TE: �'��4 6 FORM #14 e . ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: 4, E,(C DATE CIRCULATED: FEBRUARY. 6, 1986 COMMENTS DUE: FEBRUARY 13. 1986 ECF - 008-86. APPLICATION NO(s). SA 008-86 PROPONENT: JOHN S. WILSON PROJECT TITLE: NATIONAL Pi IDE CAR WASH BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT. APPLTCATION FOR STT) PTAN:APPROVAL TO BUILD A SELF-S:RVICI CAR WASH FACILITY ON 0.92 ACRE SITE LOCATION: PROJECT LOCATED BETWEEN NE 3rdIST AND NE 4th ST, 1J1,•34• FEET WEST OF JEFFE' ON AVE NE SITE AREA: \, 0/92 ACRES . BUILDING AREA. (gross): 3,976 IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS ' . ADEQUATE INADEQUATE 1) Earth • 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Reso rces 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare �I 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: 1-ka ru, eC-r ciofo r1 c1 r c oc-4-k l rn + FAY "Ycj+61/1 ' HddtX\11)( 14`4- Dii( 10 10 Ccked Q �� Cult. �1a ( fu r, J I t%(dnv-C VA ✓1 Jac OtetiOdpnia . 1\ff-a +4 re,.-h o helve_ col 4d VQv Im tf cm 4e. . veId ,vin -r P 110162, ? ? .F = RECOMMENDATION: (J DNS MITIGATED DNS [] EIS REVIEWED BY:R#7C114) TITLE: 4(tc of Pp. DATE: of ( FORM #14 :; • ;icy o I 411TYi OF RENTOh. FILE NO(S) S _a©R_g� E:, ® BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT EGF- Ong-S6 MASTER APPucAnoNL , .mil NOTE TO'+APPLICANT:"%Since thislis-.a:comprehensive applicationl_form; only�4.hos �__.:J items related to your specific type of application(s) aye to be completed._-._._, (Please print or type. Attach additional sheets if necessary.)> I /_ .] APPLICANT •-• ' TYPE OF APPLICATION NAME �S3‘AM �, „ , ` 1\\, w \ FEES 4 `� L 0 REZONE*(FROM TO ) ADN1L (�1 1 2` l \T 1 t�1 �,a-.: 0 SPECIAL PERMIT* CIT _ IP 0 TEMPORARY PERMIT* • . t% `" t�\ . � () C� CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT* i®V �9 ll��\/ SITE PLAN APPROVAL 3 i65.0 O • TEL PHONE !!nn [I SPECIAL PERMIT FOR GRADE AND FILL .56 4 �o V�I Pm 5��� lll� • ElNo. RIANofCE* Cubic Yards: VA CONTACT PERSON . From Section: . * Justification Required NAME „)z) c\A' ,. W\\. (A) . . 4 . ADDRESS SUBDIVISIONS: • \4\24• V1.1—N ki® 0 SHORT PLAT CIT i;N., TENTATIVE PAT �� 1k , �(��2 PRELIMINARYLPLAT TELEPHONE CD ` FINAL PLAT A CNA.®() �� , - ([,N1) 1::: WAIVER (Justification Required) OWNER NO. OF LOTS: NA �\y �\y PLAT.NAME e- . , ' ' I �- ' / , ,, i 1 ADDRESS PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: �`- NA1-D.,'�/�I \f l-WA L:::1 PRELIMINARY CT ► V-,W` N V 1'�/ l=P � FINAL . P.U.D. NAME: TELEP NE P l C\ 0NW\ - oVVW���tj ' 0 0Residential Industrial \` 0 Commercial Q Mixed LOCATION MOBILE HOME PARKS: PROPERTgYADDRESS ��� t � V�p31 = �`Q� ED TENTATIVE .�' • E ISTING USE PRESENT ZONING .� PRELIMINARY AMCW�; A RS—\ ' 0 ,FINAL PROPOSED USE '- - PARK NAME: � � NUMBER OF SPACES: ✓f ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW 'COMMITTEE'' 00.00 S FT. - r. ORES ' AREA: .• AN) , a:- TOTAL FEES 585,00 ,,.a„ ,-Y,f, „, ,;S,V1FF USE ONLY ---ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESSING DATE STA},'IP�.) a : 11� sp. N] m N APPLICATION RECEIVED BY. 'R J :�. P.V. ilz .g�. 1„1'2 II `' ,' • •l� i •)� R.j 4 ' -APPLICATION DETERMINED TO BE: Ja 4 x,°I. J A N 2 91986 ' 0 Accepted ' 0 Incomplete Notification Sent On By: BIJU r)ING/7(-11ili'-)TWPT -' .- • (Initials) DATE ROUTED • ' ADDITIONAL MATERIAL RECEIVED BY: APPLICATION DETERMINED TO BE: ia" IG" e5C 0 Accepted • 0 Incomplete Notification Sent On By: • (Initials)_ • ROUTED TO: rg Building Et Design Eng. EILFire J Parks • ' 15i1 Police rg Policy Dev. ® Traffic Eng. Utilities 1 l / RF.VTRF.11 1_Zl_on - 1 • • Legal description of property (if more space is required, attach a separate sheet). .cr\M C_U ' ' 1� • s r� ' •,....�.� ' .� • ' yam• i" ! �. . 141 !, B' • • 11. f• AFFIDAVIT_- . „ '- 1-< is '.• I, \*310 , being duly, sworn, declare that I am authorized representative to act for the property owner,Eiwner'of the-propertyinvolved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers;,herein-;cor1'tairied and. then` r _,,;' information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the'best of my knowledge and belief. - _ '•' , ' ; f. +�.p �' SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS --�; ) Y g DAY OF " jfl,V® 198c NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR THE STATE OF ti, - WASHINGTON, RESIDING AT• 41111111r4mAikif---!,. 600,7-7 , D)-(7k 71""iiiddizgarn, \ 1 (Name of Notary Public) (Si. iature of Ow -r) (Address) /J Address) / (City) (State) (Zip) (Telephone) Acceptance of this application and required filing fee does not constitute a complete application. Plans and other materials required to constitute a complete application are listed in the "Application Procedure." 1'7 A OF R4� � � ECF: • I f 40 © z City of Renton 3 LU: ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST So SEPT - 7, r! ti Purpose of Checklist: (k! r{1 J A N 2 9 1986 The` State Environmental Policy Act (SE•PA), chapter 43,21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposaiibeki ,a king DE PT. decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for aliproposals with probable significant adverse Impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. Instructions for Applicants: - This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental Impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give• the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply." Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions, if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a. period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or ,Its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there' may be significant adverse impacts. Use of Checklist for Nonproject Proposals: (Please Type or Print Legibly) Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals; even though questions may be answered "does not apply." IN ADDITION, complete the. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D). • For nonproject actions (actions involving decisions on.policies, plans and programs), the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area; respectively. A. BACKGROUND 1. Name Of proposed project, if applicable: NATIoNA.L. f OW- a WAsN . 2. Name of applicant: ";'• ovitmiNk &mai F© L Ov1NGC. ,‘...)ot►N W I1.S.®N 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact.person: • c-tAe7P50.4--c b'jR.oW euc-'•f %Teo-so IN Ng..e.volt.c-c6 f:S. • II 0,00 t py Grp ' Alf N.S. ri . SGATT-LG -, Wq.. °I$125 - 3(07- 36o0 , 4.1 Date checklist prepared: 0_2L}- S:G 5.,! Agency requesting checklist: • Uoh.c."�en It6149 Z.0 N11 V9-7I% NT 6.` Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Ca►v op, cotvSII-C)O-clo-r4 Ste 11i+ '► 1 , lq B+GP 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansions, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? if yes, explain. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. 1uoNE 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. 10. List any governmental approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. im spE Site lT elLov A t+ A N o 130/1-p pv4 (Peon)7. 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. A SCI.F-SERVICE T 01..) CD. q2 Ac-26 SITE . "TNE SU11.O1N&• Ott.a ) lS 317Co C:4•F'T. "TttL< �AC1t-ITy Coas/STSIu6 oR 'feN w SH1Ne 8i4Ys , 5 vAccc)h 161.4),,wP , Olin N l SL.e}No, put eNti.os EA Re-Fuse AAA APO 25 PAtttc.tt�Ei STALc.S 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topography map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not-required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. `T liE cq..c..1ec-T Is Local•lsfl 3e61' S"f'. A}w i- ►� A S-C. , 13 t . 3 4 F•G><T to S'f o 1L Jarrett-so At,G. N.G . B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. EARTH a. General description of the site (circle one); 4� rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? e• 7 c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, caly, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. SANG, cALAveL. / , NO S1L1 . d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. - 2 - Aik • • e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate q;. ties of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. Nowe f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. 1i1p g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: • /f`‘ 2. AIR a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. M11J114.uIA Aµou r ©F Du t H/WI OGG.0 . 'pc)(t i1JGG CONt-nr-ow la+'J. litPra1-- TNtz IcAcA L.\.t Y tS 114 Oc RA lo.J 'mete MiaHT SF A ' Weil MUM 144.0c of aF ,4(..rroKo15/LE &041S&Io•NC b. Are there any off-site sources of emission? fJd wo-r o c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any:. N/A 3. WATER a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or In the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, • wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. NoiJe 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. PO • 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. PA - 3 - 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdra, s or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximately qua....ities if known. 1)O 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. I)d 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. Po b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and appaoximately quantities if known. No 2) - Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals . . .; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. c. Water Runoff (including storm water): I) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. Sc) .FAC- ILuN 09 Fe°IK TNt SITE. wk\a. ? E cog-Lac-MO 1 p-ro STociii wA7-E0- SYSTEM, Ve,,VGN To MET "Mg Crry OF IUN-roN lS 7LECPv112-G Ma ivrS. 146 S(S76M WI".. Se 1'I54) To ct-rc, STom 3EwE ., • 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. J - 4 - 4111 • d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, g. .f, and runoff water impacts, if any: Nowe 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: o deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other o evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other o Shrubs V grass o crop or grain o Wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other o water plants: water lily, eel grass, milfoil, other o other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? ALL Taie GpAss mN TIDE} st-te• w1LL SG 67.-LM4OVd�. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. 1.)0PE. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: L.A pN(J S.cPt N G •pe, CU" iteN rc),J's q u atE iti cYNi rr 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: Birds: Hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other Mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other Fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. IjoNC c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. )Jp • - 5 - • d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, it any: Po 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing. etc. P TU6L/4-L Gt A& 4)I L L f t)SL D FOR- O C ATI pc c. ATeR- . ELec.TIR-1 G1't'i' &ALu ere CO Fo2. 1-(C.447/We- ANO 1/01cc,ue1 MA-cHtN'@-s • b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. 1L C) c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: 1t.9®NF 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: j.)ON6 b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? 1J®NL - 6 - 2) What types and levels of noise would be created n, .associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis ki or example: traffic. construction. operation. other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts. if any: • 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? VA srt6 lS (AA-Rem-We VAcA TRZ <p9-01711tUTce L.(-4. of THE Sin t S VA THS en-Y'y N.r u. oft nd6 si-ra is a4 tnitiz6, IAnito-iKem-r" cool? . THE. ?itopaft-r1 aAs 1 oft -tHd t17.6 I S VA c4 ur. I? sz.n A Gloss -rH t= sire ON iv-E. di t s 7'• Ab6 TT)o S rnl6.( E FAK+r- g-seCI Cdiv17 b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. Igo c. Describe any structures on the site. Nowt d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? /q . e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? SvlptNe-cS fJLCIII-IGT 00-)) f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? IAVI>lu IA 06N srt'q' Wt.1l —FA g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so. specify. . NCB i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? aorle k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: - 7 - 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: ZHC ?g0.)Eur CpMeLlcii 'To. (vCe-ceN? ZobyI _ COoc- • 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate • whether high, middle, or low-income housing. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. N/R c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: N/ 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed. '1'HC QoILoO NG lS IS- G" NICE} Lorn4 Met/4L 1t of/N- AMO 8pcl. WALLS b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? Ne c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: uoNE 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? Po c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? PoNL d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: 1JoNG 6 - 8 - 12. Recreation - a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? IL)o MC- b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. �Jo c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: poNe 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers, known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. Uo b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological. scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. N/A c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: IJoNL 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plane, if any. Se�t��► T St'CF 1c1t-oM 'SOTN M t • 36'•4 ST, it IV 6..4 a • WILL H4VL oevcr G MritA1LJ us c u L.Y AWn Owls Ski r c J L y ,Diy vLcwAtes SEA Si-r ®i-AN b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximately distance to the nearest transit stop? yE S c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? THE go...0 L.c1 WILL OlLe'.i E S. eotir-V-11-G- $Q*c.-6S . d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). Rio . • - 9 - • , 0 • a. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or f air transportation? If so, generally describe. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. THE es•T.1'1v -re vet-m c-v 1-Ato- -1-$-16.1. tpNR- OAY wovi-O 8a 2 5d Gsa S , g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. }JcNC! 16. Utilities a. Cl = utilities current available at the site: electricitv�, �oatural gas i _ = = to ep one sanitary sewer septic system. other. STott.H St?We-C. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the' project, the utility providing the service. and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. -me eivzszEcrr w1LL feQul -rHe• vsa oft Tt16 FoCcowrNo- mums tR-V1ce j CtecrIII ITY, wiroR-a` GAS J 4.)<+1-647-j Fuss .9E1-VIDE16, "reLe 400 ON // .SA1vIT14R-y Seweir- AKO £04,41 SEG'Eic . C. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned. state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrep entation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Proponent: Name Printed: SON CH.Al &ow‘w A'f't"4 A►�UL-- • • - 10 - #176 11-8-8- �� t `2 l i' s yyF Thl k If ' J JAN29 — SECTION: G-1 IRRIGATION SPECIFICATIONS 1300 A. EXTENT:Includes furnishing all labor,materials and equipment for the proper inl alla`tion`oi tl e irngatton system.The work includes, but is not necessarily limited to,the following:.(1)Trenching and Backfill; (2)Automatically controlled irrigation system; (3)Test all systems and make operative;(4)"As-Built" Drawings. B. GENERAL: 1. Permits and Fees:Obtain all permits and pay required fees to any governmental agency having jurisdiction over the work. Inspections required by local ordinances during the course of construction shall be arranged as required.On completion of the work,satisfactory evidence shall be furnished Landscape Architect to show that all work has been installed in accordance with the ordinances and •code requirements. 2. Approval:Wherever the terms"approve,""approval"or"approved"are used in the specifications, they shall mean the approval of the Owner in writing. 3. Before any work is started,a conference shall be held between the contractor and the Owner • concerning the work under this Contract. 4. Coordination:Coordinate and cooperate with other contractors to enable the work to proceed as rapidly and efficiently as possible. 5. Inspection of Site. a. Contractor shall acquaint himself with all site conditions. Should utilities not shown on the plans be found during excavations,Contractor shall promptly notify the Owner for instructions as to further action.Failure'to do so will make Contractor liable for any and all damage thereto arising from his operations subsequent to discovery of such utilities not shown in plans. b. Contractor shall make necessary adjustments in the layout as may be required to connect to existing stubouts,should such stubs not be located exactly as shown,and as may be required to work around existing work at no increase in cost to the Owner.- 6. Protection of Existing Plants and Site Conditions:The Contractor shall take necessary precautions to • protect site conditions to remain.Should damage be incurred,this Contractor shall repair the damage to its original condition at this own expense. 7. The Owner reserves the right to substitute,add or delete any material or work as the work progresses. Adjustment to the contract price shall be negotiated if deemed necessary by the Owner. .8. The Owner reserves the right to reject material or work which does not conform to the Contract Documents.Rejected work shall be removed or corrected at the earliest possible time. 9. Work Schedule:Within 10 days after award of the Contract,the Contractor shall submit to the Owner a work schedule. 10. "As-Built"Irrigation Drawings: Prepare an"As-Built"drawing on a blueline print which shall show ' deviations from the bid documents made during construction affecting the main line pipe,controller locations,remote control valves,quick-coupling valves and all sprinkler heads.The drawings shall also indicate and show approved substitutions of size,material and manufacturer's name and catalog name and catalog number.The drawings shall be delivered to the Owner before final - ' acceptance of work. 11. Final Acceptance:Final acceptance of the work may be obtained from the Owner upon the -. satisfactory completion of all work. .12. Guarantee:All work.shall be guaranteed for one year from date of acceptance against all defects in material;egtiprnentand workmanship.Guarantee shall also cover repair of damage to any part of :the premises resulting from leaks or other defects in material,equipment and workmanship to the • ,- ,satisfaction of the Owner.Repairs,if required,shall be done promptly at no cost to the Owner. • G. MATERIALS • • 1. General:All materials throughout the system shall be new and in perfect condition.After award of the Contract and prior to beginning work,the Contractor shall submit for approval six copies of the . .� complete list of materials which he proposes to install.Quantities of materials and equipment need ,not be included.No deviations from the specifications shall be allowed. I G-1 t a t. • . 2. Plastic Piping:All main line pipe 3"and smaller shall be Schedule 40,Type 1120-1220 polyvinyl chloride(PVC)pipe and shall conform to CS-256-63. 3. Plastic Fittings:Schedule 40,polyvinyl chloride(PVC)standard weight as manufactured by Sloane, Lasco,or approved equal. 4. Solvent Cement:Compatible with PVC pipe and of proper consistency. • . 5. Sprinkler Head Risers:Schedule 40 galvanized iron pipe or Sch.80 PVC for risers.Pipe shall be cut in . a standard pipe cutting tool with sharp cutters. Ream only to full diameter of pipe and clean all rough edges or burrs.Cut all threads accurately with sharp dies.Not more than three(3)full threads shall show,beyond fittings when pipe is made up.Assemblies shall be as detailed. 6. Automatic Controllers: - . (Select•paragraph from listings for appropriate controller and insert here.) 7. Remote Control Valves: (Select paragraph from listings . • for appropriate control valve and insert here.) 9. Control Wires:24-volt solid wire U.L.approved for direct burial in ground.Minimum wire size: 14 gauge. 10. Sleeves for Control Wires:'Under all walks and paving and where.indicated on drawings.PVC 1220=160 p:s.i.plastic'pipe or galvanized heavy wall steel conduit.' 11. Sprinkler Heads: ' - • +(Select paragraph from listings for appropriate sprinkler head and Insert here.) , 12. Service.Saddles:Shall`be Smith-Blair double strap,all bronze: ' • 13. 'Quick.Coupling"Valves:Shall be as noted on drawings. D. WORKMANSHIP: • 7. Lay out work as accurately as possible to the drawings:The drawings,though carefully drawn,are generally diagrammatic to the;extent that swing joints,offsets and all fittings are not shown. • 2. The'Contractor°shall be responsible for full and complete coverage of all irrigated areas and shalt make any:necessary minor adjustments at no additional cost:to the Owner: - 3._,Any:major revisions o the irrigation'system must'be submitted and answered in written form;along" - ' ;with any ,.Cochange.incntract price. - ' _ E. iINSTALLATION: 1. Excavating and Trenching: : , ; a. Perform all excavations as required for the installation:of the work includedd.under'this section, mcludingshoringof earth banks to prevent cave-ins.`Restore all surfaces,existing underground installations,etc.;_damaged or cut,as a'result of the excavations to their original condition and in a . r - :manner approved by the Owner. , , , . b. Trenches shallbe;made wide enough to allow a minimum of 6 inches between parallel pipe lines. Trenches for pipe lines shall be made of sufficient depths to provide the minimum cover from • finish grade as follows: , ;1) 18".minimum cover over main'lines. •- ;'_' :; , , 2) 12"minimum cover over control wires from controller to'valves. ' . 3) "12"minimum"cover over lateral lines to heads. - :C. Maintain all warning signs,shoring,barricades,flares and red lanterns as required by the Safety Orders of the Division of Industrial Safety and any local ordinances: G-1 O • • 2. Pipe Line Assembly: a. Install remote control valves where shown and group together where practical;place no closer than 12 inches to walk edges,buildings,.and walls. b. Plastic pipe and fittings shall be solvent welded using solvents and methods as recommended by manufacturer of the pipe,except where screwed connections are required. Pipe and fittings shall be thoroughly cleaned of dirt,dust and moisture before applying solvent with a non-synthetic bristle brush. c. Pipe may be assembled and welded on the surface.Snake pipe from side to side of trench bottom to allow for expansion and contraction. d. Make all connections between plastic pipe and metal valves or steel pipe with threaded fittings • using,plastic male adapters. 3. Sprinkler Heads: • .a. Install all sprinklers as detailed on drawings. b. Use pipe joint compound on galvanized iron fittings. 4. Closing of Pipe and Flushing Lines: a. Cap or plug all openings as soon as lines have been installed to prevent the entrance of materials that would obstruct the pipe.Leave in place until removal is necessary for completion of installation. b. Thoroughly flush out all water lines before installing heads,valves and other hydrants. c. Test in accordance with paragraph on Hydrostatic Tests. d. Upon completion of the testing,the Contractor shall complete assembly and adjust sprinkler heads for proper distribution. 5. Hydrostatic Tests: .a. Request the presence of the Owner in writing at least 48 hours in advance of testing. b. Testing to be accomplished at the expense of the Contractor and in the presence of the Owner. c. Center load piping with small amount of backfill to prevent arching or slipping under pressure. d. Apply a continuous and static water pressure of 60 p.s.i.when welded plastic joints have cured at least 24 hours and with the risers capped as follows: - 1) Main lines and submains to be tested for 12 hours. 2) Lateral lines to be tested for 2 hours. e. Repair leaks resulting from tests. } 6. Automatic Controllers: a. Connect remote control valves to controller in a clockwise sequence to correspond with station setting beginning with Stations 1,2,3,etc. • 7. Automatic Control Wiring: a. Install control wires,sprinkler mains and laterals in common trenches wherever possible. b. Install control wires at least 18"below finish grade and lay to the side and below main line. Provide looped slack at valves and snake wires in trench to allow for contraction of wires.Tie wires in bundles at 10 'intervals. • c. Control wire splices will be allowed only runs more than 500 feet.Connections shall be as detailed. d. All wire passing under existing or future paving,construction,etc.,shall be encased in plastic or • :galvanized steel conduit extending at least 12"beyond edges of paving or construction. e. Backfill and Compacting: , a. After system is operating and required tests and inspections have been made,backfill excavations and trenches with clean soil,free of rubbish. 'b. Backfill for all trenches,regardless of the type of pipe covered,shall be compacted to minimum ' 90%density. •.c. Compacf trenches,in areas to be planted by thoroughly flooding the backfill.Jetting process may be used in those areas. d. Dress off all areas to finish grades. - -F. CLEAN-UP:Remove from the site all debris resulting from work of this section. . • G-1 • / Y .1 Z e7610RM1l.L �' _ Zdi PfNM1NhY Ric.all. T : Miel p - �1L.K•N -p a nit/ o . 41.0r1101 i. CaNarIlL.4....• t.. - 6'b'� ed_oo �rxAeK �I/I171N++fkA \1 --- fib' N.o RaMOIyryV.L CI m b CI i }CN4bIt we.taW,xec V k!j 4T•.+,�. ; ) /m Q 1 4°F 0.4,-NM+, i t' he //j fill / to ` --- i17vt-r.11 / 9G...E.,) VICINITY MAP Eb. / et •$ joo Norkt �, i �tr a�o�.I l,.FAKE- 1'ROJ11C.1 I1{r lEMTION . — '1° ' • I .114E NRNf r*D.bo 191.101.01.11111..Hwf:'HI1.T.5 '.IUF13t71eTION: 4 RCM 1Y of ICN L.r 17 • I . er-1NK•Neell+wr.axFtKi Of INS H/R7NHW( -- 1 K P I.p. \ 0 \ 4 viR1�or'ifteneN 16 •o4NeHlf•n 1+>RM, :ToNIN4: Ib•I RMi4001: 0 W+.,xwAL� �, a POW',a/MDT..NM,KI muNtY,hNa1MaCN, mi.. W(.' - i `I \� LYiN.NOeTNRiIY of N.C.e'�eiACRT•'. �R'f "+EKMIC�HIL: 0 `-,�,� I ' 1 vs Homo so COST FeR e1ClIlEf• ['MOOT ID - occUr>'FiN: b-I(cf.N►.4) I• -'^"""\ I r W-+tMW'ITc N'A'PMM0'rtler-b a►C0dFD. eN-ring I 'I K'cHf.efof+l 5uaF 1-{ _ [col C AND LeTD) SKI I \- U Lei I.fRA: o.4c l Jam-., -b naRcaL Mrl10Q }UILeINdi.i.RRi.: yi7s sl. - I \`I' .1 �/ Lac c+laCboa-9114 Ho,a AR.GNa RF41O: II LfAtL! • of I.0t'b.l ecaea-.Int. ' I .\(J 9 Ho.ef frF.WMe"CFo+'I?1L: Ca ytNae . 8 \ I a. 1 , ` Z 2 1 I I, •' I \ > 3 . . 744r., . i—, is I F i I I // �v �,,I • '' z 1 1 • / // past ca •a so s is8 Y� //l Y� / \, d' - 4,..' 1.1t,f"..1.N I N. ' / dp x l • .d +.IaLc� w.anL us rrsaca I . , . . . ,--------. . `, A-! a e MD I -5'o' 171 a.ptri t.was- , WW 1t, ce•o+ �, [4 I4Jl )oN twti a wn wtewe. - ►1CD4.keflNc� -Az- OMfA CerN) s. ..Fro lounc.NHH[+a I P beRotLf%. E 1 '� p NoPf 4 4 4fV114 %U is.i 9'-0•,.401-o MIDral- .5I5rt4. Vb-1. e u C o'ytfektt- .4• 1'9 ET ,id..... -&.. „CC6ulF)nmFINCi • a NA ION D C1 _ \ \ �• p a "o _ II Ir. e'-d •U[11 xC 4oC'v afF"o 4•41 N IW7HM - oNfP .M +c. OI,. • I '.o" i NATI - PE-CAfe WASH � o Z fry z L--------- ---------------__----------------------__-------------------J -5A �t1YA11ON O ° fi,, T„ Fl li i ® . . Y�gg 5 -. I a¢a'-o' gg '&i8 ir\ jI Fb n. -I _MI_ o.¢_ a o.S. ,No,4. a. FW7. Fb,b. Fb.9. • Ii ` .\ .\ Ii 1 i -o\ - \ +. . II \\V \ y a }a'A' o \ 1 . Il • ,,.r A-2 CP• A. HEI ?btNf ALL nMlrAFb rFAMI=G • . TO_H1445 OFMW buck.. Jt rolL n -Yq' IH' )g'G wtLbnb 4 Hoeex IG AA.op.lV.cl-M-4.IpL IILUldT1ot bRP�RALv..e.FfrF Ar�fJgla N �— /Ahithip..\„:,...... .,...TVF-1-ft4L.. _ ILAP.G.-S-o'oC.le A..q .aHEE hAlen c T . nAy rIPIN49...D -TAI.. 7UbINQ'UFNIsHr _ - , - - yf N.rt. t2 4ZrN4rANI L RLVFM4 `' ar o II__-__ '_ __ -" —._ EL+o - 'DY N.T.B. - - I 1----------- J L I r J L > 1 L I I �-� 1.9....4 n eW mNlxwToc r •111 L \Tor norron,of CbLIW 4'DoLT To orb.) A 1- 1" e J I- `1.I.P.E-INSTILL IL0 FX C FLA4�t!F 9/.Y C 1 Q+IFY �CFEw'TKrrIWH TO L'Omt of PUKUN \IvW wr» 11ATTIN4 MFwrt6lT a'xq° .I'y 7n-.PrxrE w/t-We I'ro 1G CpNiFActalC I EXIT slnF_o) g .14'x c'METAL roCF�L,yo tvy N.nls. �IoF'TCCU4H F'UFNISHVi RH N . le'_(oN3 ryeLTs wELfiEb it, { • S, l Nola: CeNTFAOTbt To INs7AU.ALL.? ( y4 x6°xa'x9'%' E rUFLfN&Lir Cb.• rUTM R�-c , d SI4N4 oN'✓ALL.VEICIF LocOFloN ?WV(Tb rUFLIN W/4-I .Eo LM. p -U 4EL SIGNArq -DETAIIf -4 rr..' f-N OE..r.4 LL♦oi.*INPL ICLINb. y2¢ 5 �o -.IAN.. 4 ANCILOFs OUFNinlito IET WE heA.WIELD 7o FINq MATE..GTlr•> - 'C a . . — — 1 - — I L'4'ALV.ANGLE . j c ENrrf...51DE- — - I I es.MAT HOLPEF--MouNT TNFu ZXIT sll�✓ Le,FLACK?Ir6 14'-0' I T^N, b ,o. I r--I I I I I WASH h'A( vies)..), "/eg ALL Tuwv yobs rim To nVi , .�sle{J) I I(sI4N)I Rory ruFHvISHEo roy N.P V-. RJKJ KNISI ev•FiLNE.P�.s. -?` I MOUNT ON i•ACH Sloe op wAu. - • - IY�a•].v>°Ir _To . y- �,[may n • --- L J I-_J e 'I 'DEAIC ON ANGLE y� FooPINo / 1• r �6'x4',.le°coNC.rJFICK wALL. Mr/ —�- L__j o-wAL nAi.ONK`(WALL RIUNroF. Q Q CJ Q /! I L-- rr� I6 oc.V6FT1tALLY. hFICK Tb U{iCY I I 1�`t�,- ' T6r._- Ur TWIT To pear 17E44 oN END w•t.Ls. coNrPAL 6Nb of YIIELM w/ye.'Dicier.‘ h'-q' TL 4'-0° 1 LOe �,_o, I,_�. 7� 'I-oi C.NP HoIDRR.IsY Nl7'L" / Ck Unto...Li_ - M.l M'.re `. O �i ur GTYr) - .n / / ,f'/ rKIDF iaerf•Crtrl. - I L F V' WANG.row-my AWAY - - rV LING 3',.'�'x Jq'G G''LONa — /�(� �� F'RoM sAFt. 11t'gALY•AN4LE• -r -() _ { —— �cfo<iCP A44_ rEoYID6 7e AIL THFIAb .- _ MA4eNRY WALI,.� al Vd' -nAsaNF(OPG1. �- FOD-'DOLT THFU wNL - J • I MGUNT eN=.blbG 6r p _ "e-oe 3 4 I I ie""xe•. 4s wr Fwr°a Fob Fx - -� 3 I es.g. n_rlerelc -4 I. LAc STA F bETA1L.. e • 1.-°I I. -WO,Co1.IG.0 WALLs. 7 • ! ` I I / 0 fl) - 3 I I'� ELEV. ELEV.PUe..nCNN �/ `o rrNc.hLAa w/FILL. i/G W,w F, 1 I _ I.J. • OVEC cufr•cTSp FILL. 6__I or,ti�aNPcTIORJ ^ _ .rt 4 or, EE7. V 12 ° t ' Z Oi 7 0 T IZAL Ssc.-1-1 ow 'T141Zu WASI-I P5a' 5 2 a ve e ,GAL'6 Wi I '. ILo' • • v?1 t� 4PA�JEL' l g i 6°vIG 4A.4ALV.cMANN OL rjFIGK To FooF ' rLFLIN.(eurtilr�rURLM on�K. +IbivN)------ Ip.',rbS.b',, 'wlDt rulel.N 1bIFICKFN2 GP II . owl"Mao"-FboLT-fo ruFLN w/4-Vi'4,F,..LTS, -- - WELD TO bRAICIN4 Malt . 61xG'x Y}''TM.bFG 1-LATa w/e-f 4 I6' II Lott A.NCNOF•hours II + WELDE4 TO rLATE -- 4 ' 4'I L I ' II OKOoF FRAMING PETAL ZCd.L68 lie -II-a' A-3 cc ., ors 114 I �.� - 1 6 E1 I - L T • LAWN SAWN- . . .• . .. : :ad . 7.msrizzlir,To. , .......,.._ft..___i AuGraLLATIOIJ Uo-ru r.1 ,x..PE milerAI.I�RT�p..o_1.kCtilub_.{ 641 I /�== p:1,70E.-zE,A. P.ar .xvJ�e;'Luw Alin 6�v wl ..._1:1511a*Tvq. 11„00 7 awro,l va.,EJl.wa ` ... . :hze"t Q y �- rnlq _wphAt� �t -4TM afa�7 _■ i_f•+I i 6 !I o��II( � . ,L D f 64.4 IU..AT wEK _' ki •n WI W W 01 ~ by � I.,€'t Co :Ml -ME-oVJGNF.t/�. - --'---p .. N• oA[AL�.,�. • �' "TOp0f3RAPNY. C co GC7L AYIMFAdDMEA1p' AR6 UM UWED � � 'CAf.WANT. A-'.. - I �,��Cs,--,.. �) (.' FcC.L.1 Fi66•Y71't!i{Si ADDI.TIDUg1. \�'' ' F_1 ,m�_: �_ _"l �pA�jdgql d�llU Ap�y!1 IONiT 11/yY W-_�l•l+_W . C.� -� }514414.DE W02KF-0-10 A LO.- . �'m-..... +zV0.N1EGD FAArt i WAI+ w r^y - c.) IKIALL rb• COT by R Al Y r C .7 P M(I EDP I rra:�,.: I Vi�I NiZY MAP .140M I 3 (7r. SMAT IAL CFfJpP.AbLF�.1VppI��T1!_ ,I S -'CVAGUJh. c�.' i to a WILL UAgice I�-�:at fR-Y,t� CI.' A��Q KOFC5W MAMA.,SSt.F. LF GAL v f r. e T A'1• pp 7y of I(.,�� Tomb WEhr 163.61. .1,4 Gf IRE W5.T HALF (� O i FEVi7Wt. A MILIIMUUM YATC�PJI?SL �U ��4 Ioo 1 cfArcrtaL Of �FTAW 11 .WAD pp MADE.7o ALI: 'DED6 Ip u' ,]Al A FAT--of 10 Ie• 9 e I r W.N.IuNC7[OUNry WAhaINQlty. -ed f Ps+ i �t iMT F of WE *claw0Drum; txc�Pr- :� $ sASEAMITh 4 tEhFV0.11 *DF " 10.- O Iw&°ll Av ..,.p.gems WILL: LO(z k wi�sl. cuul►n auo piAT wp"aA+t++c ols W6L1.Y✓A !-3et�7A. N •] e -A6iFhOrtI4 pADt1.Lt NUM6F.R , - AU..FIAUr MATELIAL WILL Dbpap,- I.oI 2-I42'bcr-.1114 r Te WILL�tue N i Y LOT ry -Iez3oy-aara p - 2 Z *Apse 4 T1PEAL • w Yi -'• 1 p INq MOW? WILLy�,�I,y Ll_ 0 2 14 AN EA um.4lLt 10 ActoAAl�dl� N AT IOIJ Al. PRIDE, CAR PLANTI I X1 LE G f.IJl7 - Herr w�pJWl N71+r" ' •MWL. :LtoMFJ.ICLA1u0.t. .cup. �i1u Wuvmcl) -- per'. a taxE VEsbn.au§ ' a / pINu4 j,w�1DEptsaiApAMow wuc pFsnc c�wr,,. a , r w qwr It .AO o1TEC? P'w N/ac.q c . ' b �"L q �-+ O o wY�` wYt;owN IICal.E.vl aAT 1tA s�.1uAv .� i. cp>7°M' - 'T' (1A1TpER1ALQ1HoNLN °'LKarsT'1• ' zYa Auc ,4 . . - i WA. ' �/ 9 Zp A. AMID Mtlf tlFil UCN FtKOf./tA.W'(N KF.F.(VW. WBW*WOW -- _.4_ . .2- ,1 J1c5��K��CK. MUU,1 ( Eft ' • - rl. 1"6 _7NALtititY.(`N•1. '--y O • DApAkup Ml1LW-WILT. DF.MAbE. 7 ( r eSE e' N� bpi D�' 4:0) rows�uoan 15 cZA'Norm* wM L Ec / '� D M 1/s1j,ATM EbE� IaaITb�IUL). 2'J` tut,: :Izµ+ - / R :�s ILL maw.,�AK&C WITFF e..o�t>N.AgTt�. :�::�,•�:�e'' .WA OAI WOQ1L pQQJELT 14 IW Cof6Af �( -0' -MWIuuM TaR�(�) i t'.1' r• ' ■i9R G!a COM Lp t7LY 3Nrrfau E o. uaTtW). r� ! _pFA,rl,ey e•I0'•. I "rM t 6'�_r 3i �a`s • -pi16 WILL cow- m A coup 6 =JUAI VE.Ild6..GAIARAINk'U.DCKAD.. WAY.bfAl1'11ED_ �•. pI��T 4 t FWICV►ED T• T1 4 (�.Cpw JuNlt�l. .._ IA �L. Ww. 4/ l • CA MA(cc 1pAL1 M-4 0 (42gM WP AI • G l'•b fFJ.1 _ rk--r°4-4)Nerl:i'L .�y11 111 CAS Ii-- ,., d v1a1RNUM�A..1IDII CDAV10 bIIWLL4FAI A E(. '+ ���Y,y[r \ONIUM 1• :6Jl 42, �Q�)AI�+.r :61AUWF.O. _ , mod' 7`�:,;i. ..;:i. 1cUM.sl,Lvcluuu(6S.Y�auy--. F4f_' --?4•aG.1124.G.- r ,rl �-�I--�=f •I - u�u Z • 7- li tP Q fg.A**(OVE♦r.qUA ye-.S A.A V...1., 6 5MA41.511p.Ue6��K.t.yo.c.F.IMCIu JA. /' ' 77�..Y:_eRY.G•WWI*Ik•ac.MEW MYf ➢NLtL*Mow.hpAt.6 Wax.MNVMUM. OF laP-'�4¢APNY 7EE. eliF�'_Ai . 1111iEDD11MtAA SNRu% **Ki.4'04.IAAI(IMUM. _ L- 0 £ 9H1! t . , . 4irt44a.. rerEE , • . • • , • : . •• 4 0 1.2=I CO - - -=I=31.1=11.1 : ' . , . 0 00-0 a 0 • - 0 0 0 0 0 0 ' ' I • g ..,!' , . Q 0 0 0 040--< i' 1 g ••• . 0 :11'"iur" Igallitir 1Z/"Ite/.1-% Itat DM 6 -0 0 0.1",0- ;.i, -- • 0 • • au-41*-exiztvr• - s 11 i 1 1;1 • . PM it • .017VOMFILII lip il .LW 1 .:,1014M:_•••• 4 is a I id • • • 41 ..--. ' .. .. . . VCASITY. MP ED 4., . • —. : • i• iii • • ----ucIAL. •. 1 • ., .• _lilt mtc,,,TI-ull...w.r..m., — • ,,-- • . . • on)Agrm.op_oe.criow...u...-Totstwattp-7:61,4cpri4 -10040K.:0_CAlsr.PI-CLIOLID__Cia114M.10PoOklimrrot0 . 1 I • . . '"C[Ncrigratzrki-TWI-OF-W..7.1517'.._517777:_?..1.=.7r- rtr.44W A140:Mr-=4 oTgrjr4D-.=-- 2.i . ! . =1 sourieurleem I-0i 51---00(01147-Sle02 PLAT _ ° 1 WW1.NUknotaL-•••• • I t.L • I /19 : 1! _ It i• . •R . . ___„ z ._. - , •i! • i . . _ __, ;'•,,: ./ ' ftiava.c.wip.a4 u.c.n.t4C) fix_NATIONA.L PO C*--. -----;• 4 ( , 44_. ..._ il -Z '4---. 11 CM .i. fubco oe:L.cui..r..g.VALVE.4co5 ._ .II •1•Ik f. ././ \44 PQ•f:' -'1E-ika/54-00.‘04.•itrxtrr wirww courroL. _. •______--- I or . 1 dm. . -Itaz Tr.. woou-44 ti2-OG-01. _ -- i'LliTmrri_. ---,---'e,---=- . . Mg I la Galan:ill:II 1, • • • " ,) / / . • ' V • . / / • -.4_ kwensur_e_.0 swum,.0&Law_1401041.3.133.10: —- I. 1,-- ••• • . /\. ' • 0 . . ' TORO MT le-1-1 —'- ' 20 - '--PI.77...10 ...=I . . 0 . 'PIC) GO? WI' 20- -—11 10 --Li • 0 .2 / . 1111 •. - 712.0 Go p 491.6r SO • 25XI2 -= ) V' "---) , .411Pe_. ' N! 6" . • I ) 0 70 1.0Le 01(24 . ;* : Q •P II ) -1221.651.014-inicp . . •to -4•Z 4iirt . iti 1.- •ce_- - . 7020 UI o CK upu- 447 ti 4,-tz Nam:.444-crs.A c vi-Y - I . 7 , • 7.4,,,, ,..... . 1111 - .,---.. . . ii_c__. L.....731 ENDING • . • OF FILE . . . . . FILE TITLE • Jr . \b..- .i , !, f 1 OS" b' 411. S . . , lai "Ma 0