Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLUA86-027 • BEGINNING OF FILE FILE TITLE . MICROFILMED ,* . . - � SA - c52 1 —&(.0 4111 �,� CITY OF RENTON t$ ® Barbara Y. Shinpoch, Mayor mAL Traffic Engineering Division February 4, 1987 CJTY OF RENTON RNMNI TO: Environmental Review Committee o FEB-0' 1987 FROM: John Adamson, Project Coordinator BUILDING/ZONING DEPT. • SUBJECT: South Lind Square ' Condition #3 Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner MacKenzie/Saito & Associates File No. SA-027-86 As requested, I have prepared a list of high priority projects to meet the ERC's conditions for the subject development. The property developer can account for their portion of the traffic mitigation fees by accomplishing the following tasks: 1 . SW 41st & East Valley Road Traffic Signal ,Controller $ 10,000.00 2. SW 16th - Lind ;Ave. SW to 0akesdale Ave. SW Complete Plans, Specifications & Estimates $ 35,000.00 3. 0akesdale Ave. ;SW - SW 31st to SW 16th Complete Plans; Specifications & Estimates $ 60,000.00 4. SW 27th Street ' - Oakesdale Ave. SW to SR 181 Design Report $ 22,576.80 Total Project Costs $127,576.80 The total cost is consistent with the trip mitigation fee for the subject development. The fee is calculated as 58,000 gfa x 11 .7 trips/1 ,000 gfa (per MacKenzie/Saito letter of 11-21-86, see attached) 678.6 trips x $188 per trip = $127,576.80 total amount due These projects are high priority and consistent with the VTIP Study. GAN:ad ;/10' e Attachment 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2620 IP- PRELIMINARY REPOR THE HEARING EXAMINER - MacKENZIE/SAITO & ASSOCIATES, FILE NO! SA-027-86 AUGUST 12, 1986 PAGE 4 3. ,3 Since the Environmental Review Committee is waiting upon additlo al, `, information to prioritize the necessary traffic improvements In the } ' sentire Green River Valley Planning Area as determined by this CH2M Hill study (covered by bond as outlined in -condition 2 above). they ti cannot !prioritize-at. this time the specific-improvements the developer, can accomplish in lieu- of actual cash payment of fees. Ttie... Environmental Review Committee will provide by September 1. 1986. the developer with-a_prioritization of needed traffic improvements andd, a construction schedule. 4. The applicant shall provide funds in the amount of $3,500 at the time of building permit application for the shell of the buildings to complete the master recreation plan for the Green River Valley in lieu of providing actual off-site public recreation. The funds shall be deposited into a special account to be utilized by the Parks and Recreation Department for preparation of the appropriate recreation master plan. 4. Various City departments have reviewed the proposal. The Building Division and the Parks and Recreation Department have recommended approval without conditions. The Design Engineering, Utility Engineering and Traffic Engineering Divisions of the Public Works Department along with the Fire Prevention Bureau and the Police Department have recommended approval with conditions. The Zoning Division originally recommended denial of the project. The department comments are as follows: POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT: APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS April 9, 1986. The subject proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan land use designation of Commercial and the existing M-P zoning of the site. It is also compatible with the surrounding land use in the vicinity. The dumpster location may be considered to be relocated, however. DESIGN ENGINEERING DIVISION: APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS. 1. Storm water retention/detention required at time of development. 2. Complete all street and utility improvements. UTILITY ENGINEERING DIVISION: NOT APPROVED. Needs full plan for fire hydrant relocation. • System development charge - sewer.- $8.003 TRAFFIC ENGINEERING DIVISION: APPROVED April 1, 1986. 1. Development should participate In the traffic signal controller replacement to improve intersection control at East Valley Road and S.W. 41st Street. STAFF RESPONSE: (ERC required payment of $10,000 to modify traffic signal controller.) 2. Developer should participate in Valley transportation improvement assessment at $175,:per trip generated. The total assessment will be determined at time of site plan submittal when square footage of each type of usage is known (office. retail and warehouse). Estimated cost for general office usage only would be as follows: 58,000 divided by 1.000 times 17.7 times 1.75 equals 179,655. STAFF RESPONSE: (ERC has determined amount as a result of their own action of June 18. 1986 and subsequent Council action.) MACKENZI AITO & ASSOCIATES, P.S. { ARCHITECTS-PLANNERS 300 120TH AVENUE NORTHEAST•BUILDING 3,SUITE 233 ' BELLEVUE,WASHINGTON 98005•(206)451-1005 re,( TRAFFIC ENG.DIV. • U U `'CSL`E'B t November 21, 1986 NOV 2 4 1986 City of Renton CITY OF RENTON Traffic Engineering Department RIPIfilWED Gary Norris Municipal Building 200 Mill Avenue South FEB 041987 Renton, Washington 98055 BUILDING/ZONING DEPT. Re: Tenant Improvement for Pacific Nautilus South Lind Square, 41st and SW Lind Avenue MSA Job No. 385611 Dear Gary: This letter is intended to summarize matters discussed with you with respect to captioned project and anticipated vehicle trip generation. We reviewed the proposed plan for approximately 9,000 sf of space for Pacific Nautilus which is relocating from its current location at 43rd to the South Lind Square project currently under construction. After our discussion of the proposed use we reviewed the ITE manual and determined that 11.7 trips per 1,000 sf would be a appropriate figure to use for this project. • If any items do not correctly outline our discussion, please call . Thank you for your cooperation and timely response to this matter. Sincerely, 0yr, Ochca, H. Lynn Takeuchi Architect cc: Rick Romney, Trammell Crow Company Jeanette McKague, Renton Planning Department mvl • MACKENZIE/S ITO'& ASSOCIATES, P.S. ARCHITECTS-PLANNERS 300 120TH AVENUE NORTHEAST•BUILDING 3,SUITE 233 BELLEVUE,WASHINGTON 98005•(206)451-1005 CITY OF RENTON January 17, 1987 1987 JAN22 BUILDING / ZONING DEPT. City of Renton Building and Zoning Department 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98052 Attention: Mr. Jerry Lind Re: South Lind Square, ERC Traffic Improvement Prioritization Listing and Construction Schedule MSA Job No. 385611 Dear Jerry: We discussed some weeks ago the report to the hearings examiner from 12 August 1986 which cited a September 1, 1986 date for the creation by the Environmental Review Comittee of the above noted listing and construction schedule. As of this date, we have received no word from your department regarding this document. You indicated that if a search of your files did not turn up the list, you would request that this item be taken up at the next ERC meeting (occuring weekly on Wednesdays). Would you please adivse us as to the status of this matter? Thank you, 4- r nk Heffernan Project Manager cc: Rick Romney, Trammell Crow Company , ,,- Lynn Takeuchi, Mackenzie/Saito & Associates • mvl • • 3P -02n - -3 o'er < o55 3 DJz.m m55 aco RcD (3N 013 Zo 3- o P. 0 < Ill <z Cu °��0-N o Z AFFIDAVIT OF PUELICATION Cu o o o ' Onom j - .765a;zOc_o Ca 6pao m ulDQm Audrey De Joi e being first duly sworn on oath states that v`2 5 z m xi m he/she is the Chief Clerk of the o aP. °�' o f 8 <c cD m m o Z mZ VALLEY NEWSPAPERS C DailyNews Journal, DailyRecord Chronicle, DailyGlobe News i %)2 v "' ' O roam ° __ 0 3 ?�Jm t° ° D0 at n.C/N N0 .2 *23 Daily newspapers published six (6) times a week. That said newspapers ;, s m 3 0�. are legal newspapers and are now and have been for more than six a= C) @ y <. CD H ce NQ1 O -.,-. ,<x 2 O �. months prior to the date of publication referred to,printed and published _N o n o N ° 5 c in the English language continually as daily newspapers in Kent, King °o o•-a co w ° ° 5 Q County, Washington. Valley Newspapers have been approved as legal o m N 7...0) FS 0 W o 0 w 0) g, _ - a a newspapers by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for a J a �m w y 3 0 o z King County. o `-° m uo -0 w 0?m-e O� g. 0.-.l.* a c' cm (7 cD, ° ° co-own � n The notice in the exact form attached, was published in the Daily News S_3 51 o 3 Z c°g o Journal , Daily Record Chronicle X , Daily Globe News , (and • -0.� *.o .a . m b Q 3. 11 m ° -a3 <0 �onoy t not in supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers during the below stated period. The annexed notice a 0 g N g o CD �p-. c4 U D-I O totice of Environmental Determination was published D ao to Qi, iv Fa ° c m =2) 3 • on flay 12, 1986 R1575 �' w - 3 Cum __,,,5WD 7 c jwCDc0000 cr aC (nw Ny,F The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the **CD N w om cmi sum of $ 25•�5 • -0 m w 2 0 Poo .a m <- CD ��� �6/ �'Z'•� r'<3.o Q a6amc a Subscribed and sworn to before me this �5th day of Itiiay 19 86 mow 1 ° c w0w13nic 7 N f0 n 5 3 1=J' cn c macx z g_265 -13 /:? G -o to m -cu=" 3 Cr — Vocr � �'n. O a. Notary Public for the State of Washington, Nam. cy, o- g ei Z residing at Federal Way, 33 m N F a al a O w County, Washington. a0°' ` 2) --- King VN#87 Revised 10 84 ,.,.'(fY i.,. ,c,: -` c0 a J (D l II 11- !^I ,,ailf i[.i (�� IT a,� w n iiJf ® ;°m l • JUL 819R6 OUli_DiNG/i ONiNG DE PT. AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ' RENTON HEARING EXAMINER ? Andre DeJoie RENTON,WASHINGTON y , being first duly sworn on oath states that A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY he/she is the Chief Clerk of the THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUN-' CIL CHAMBERS ON THE SECOND FLOOR OF CITY HALL,. RENTON, VALLEY NEWSPAPERS WASHINGTON. ON JUNE 3, 1986. AT 9:00 A.M.TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOW- ING PETITIONS: Daily News Journal, Daily Record Chronicle, Daily Globe News TRAMMELL CROW • Application for site plan approval to build, Daily newspapers published six (6) times a week.That said newspapers two buildings of 58,000 square feet to be •used as office, small retail and limited' are legal newspapers and are now and have been for more than six warehouse, file 5A-027-86; property lo- months prior to the date of publication referred to,printed and published cated on the southeast corner of Lind in the English language continuallyas dailynewspapers in Kent, KingAvenue S.W. and S.W.41st Street. g news p p GMS ARCHITECTURAL GROUP County, Washington. Valley Newspapers have been approved as legal Application for conditional use permit to newspapers by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for allow construction of mini storage build- ing complex in a B-1 tistrict,file CU-030 King County. i`86; property located at 3408 N.E. 4th Street. Legal descriptions of the files noted The notice in the exact form attached, was published in the Daily News above are on file in the Renton Building and Journal , Daily Record Chronicle , Daily Globe News (and Zoning ALL INTTE DEartment. RESTED PERSONS TO SAID not in supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRE- subscribers duringthe below stated SENT AT THE PUBLIC HEARING ON period. The annexed notice a JUNE 3,1986,AT9:OOA.M.TO EXPRESS Notice ofPublic Hearing was published THEIR OPINIONS. May 16, 19b6 Hl �� Ronald G. Nelson on 5 Building and Zoning Director ' Published in The Daily Record Chronicle May 16, 1986.R1580 The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of $ 25.25 Subscribed and sworn to before me this 21 s t day of ivitZy 19 86 o N ry Public for the State of Washington, residing at Federal Way, King County, Washington. VN M87 Revised 10/84 IIcPc . Ubl sw - ca-1-�s� AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION Pamela M. Clark being first duly sworn on oath states that he/she is the Chief Clerk of the VALLEY NEWSPAPERS • Daily News Journal, Daily Record Chronicle, Daily Globe News NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL Daily newspapers published six (6) times a week.That said newspapers DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COM-are legal newspapers and are now and have been for more than six MITTEE months prior to the date of publication referred to,printed and published RENTON,WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee I in the English language continually as daily newspapers in Kent, King (ERC) has issued a declaration of non- County, Washington. Valley Newspapers have been approved as legal significance for the following projects with newspapers by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for additional conditions imposed as mittigat- ing measures under their authority King County. Section 4-2822(D)of the Renton Municipal Code: TRAMMELL CROW(ECF-023-86) The notice in the exact form attached, was published in the Daily News Application for site plan approval to build two buildings having 58,000 square feet to Journal , Daily Record Chronicle X , Daily Globe News , (and be used for general office,small retail and not in supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its limited warehouse,file SA-027-86.Proper- ty located at the southeast intersection of subscribers during the below stated period. The annexed notice a Lind Avenue S.W. and S.W. 41st Street. Notice of Environmental Determination was published Further information regarding this actionis available in the Building and Zoning June 18 , 1986 . R 1 657 Department, Municipal Building, Renton. on Washington, 235-2550. Any appeal of ERC action must be filed with the Renton Hearing Examiner by July 2, 1986. Published in the Daily Record Chronicle The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the June 18, 1986 R1857. sum of $ 19 . 31 GZ_ Subscribed and sworn to before me this 1 9 t h day of June 19 86 . Nota blic for the State of Washington, residing at Federal Way, King County, Washington. CITY I, VN#87 Revised 10/84 '� I`7 - JUL 8 icm6 eu!t_D!NG/ZONIVC h-^T LI6s7 , NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEi RING •' AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION RENTON HEARING EXAMINER - RENTON, WASHINGTON ' A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY'!. THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER Ay Audrey De Joie , being first duly sworn on oath states that HI$REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUN- CIL CHAMBERS ON THEWSECONGO he/she is the Chief Clerk of the FLOOR OF CITY HALL; RENTON,;' WASHINGTON ON AUGUST 12, 1986, AT 9:00 A.M. TO CONSIDER.THE FOL- - VALLEY NEWSPAPERS LOWING PETITION: TRAMMELL CROW Application for site plan approval to Daily News Journal, Daily Record Chronicle, Daily Globe News build two buildings of,58,000 square feet to be used as office,small retail and Daily newspapers published six (6) times a week.That said newspapers limited warehouse, or industrial park, are legal newspapers and are now and have been for more than six file SA-027-86. Property is located en the southeast corner of Lind Avenue • months prior to the date of publication referred to,printed and published S.W.and S.W. 41st Street. in the English language continually as daily newspapers in Kent, King Legal descriptions of the files noted. Count Washington. ValleyNewspapers have been approved as legal Zoningve epa on rtmle intheRentpnBuildingand• Y� gPP g Zoning Department. newspapers by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAIL , INVITED TO BE PLi King County. SENT PETITIONS OAT THEE PUBLIC HEARING ON AUGUST 12, 1986, AT 9:00 A.M. TQ, The notice in the exact form attached, was published in the Daily News EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS. Ronald G. Nelson Journal , Daily Record Chronicle—, Daily Globe News , (and Building and Zoning Director Published in the Daily Record Qhrgnice not in supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its August 1, 1986. R1746. subscribers during the below stated period. The annexed notice a Notice of Public Hearing was published on August 1, 1986 R1748 The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of$20•79 Subscribed and sworn to before me this 5th day of Aug 19 86 Notary Public for the State of Washington, residing at Federal Way, King County, Washington. VN 087 Revised 10/84 I -1LIA - AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING :Luiroy _Jt�J:;:-e—, being first duly sworn on oath states that RENTON HEARING EXAMINER he/she is the Chief Clerk of the RENTON, WASHINGTON A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUN- VALLEY NEWSPAPERS CIL CHAMBERS ON THE SECOND FLOOR OF CITY HALL, RENTON, WASHINGTON ON AUGUST 12, 1986, Daily News Journal, Daily Record Chronicle, Daily Globe News AT 9:00 A.M. TO CONSIDER THE FOL- LOWING PETITION: Daily newspapers published six (6) times a week.That said newspapers TRAMMELL CROW are legal newspapers and are now and have been for more than six Application for site plan approval to build two buildings of 58,000 square months prior to the date of publication referred to,printed and published feet to be used as office,small retail and in the English language continually as daily newspapers in Kent, King limited warehouse, or industrial park, file SA-027-86. Property is located on County, Washington. Valley Newspapers have been approved as legal the southeast corner of Lind Avenue newspapers by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for S.W. and S.W. 41st Street. Legal descriptions of the files noted King County. above are on file in the Renton Building and Zoning Department. The notice in the exact form attached, was published in the DailyNews ALLINNS ARE INVITEDESTED TO BE SAID PETITIONS ARE TO BE PRE- SENTJournal , Daily Record Chronicle, Daily Globe News , (and AT THE PUBLIC HEARING ON AUGUST 12, 1986, AT 9:00 A.M. TO" not in supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS. subscribers during the below stated period. The annexed notice a Ronald G. Nelson Building and Zoning Director- rlo i c A n f• Public T;enr was published Published in the Daily Record Chronicle. August 1, 1986. R1748. on r.u,suat 1, 1966 (yt' The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of $20_ 79 Subscribed and sworn to before me this c;; n day of ts 19 r:E. . Notary Public for the State of Washington, g , residing at Federal Way, CITY OF nt`NTO'•I King County, Washington. �; II' r1 �•t r. VN.87 Revised 10/84 r, 1111S E P 1 ' 1QRr 1, 1 J Ir OF R�� A. 4. �� 0 THE CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH.98055 o a BARBARA' Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER 90 co. o P FRED J. KAUFMAN, 235-2593 9��F0 SEPSE��� September 5, 1986 Lynn Takeuchi 300 120th N.E. Bellevue, Washington; 98006 RE: Trammell Crow File No. SA-027-86 Dear Mr. Takeuchi: The Examiner's Report regarding the referenced application which was published August 20, 1986 has not been appealed within the 14-day period established by ordinance. Therefore, this matter is considered final and is being transmitted to the City Clerk this date for filing. , Please feel free to contact this office if further assistance or information is required. Sincerely, 41-e--# 671Y-q-- FRED J. KAUFMAN HEARING EXAMINER FJK:dk cc: City Clerk Building & Zoning Department P \ AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAAILING STATE OF WASHINGTON ) )ss. County, of King ) FRED J . KAUFMAN , being first duly sworn, upon oath, deposes and states: L- That on the o;u day of �`�``� , 1986 , affiant deposited in the mails of the United States a sealed envelope containing a decision or recommendation with postage prepaid, addressed to the parties of record in the below entitled application or petition. SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this 0/4/04. day of G(0 , 1986-. Notary P 1'"c ' n a d for the State of Washington, • residing at , therein. - Application, Petition, or Case #: TRAMMELL CROW - SA-027-86 (The minutes contain a list of the parties of record.) August 20, 198.6 OFFICE OF THE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND DECISION APPLICANT: MACKENZIE/SAITO AND ASSOCIATES File No. : SA-027-86 LOCATION: Property is located on the southeast corner of Lind Avenue S.W. and S.W. 41st Street. SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Site Plan approval to construct two buildings for a total of 58, 000 square feet to be used for office, small retail and limited warehouse uses. SUMMARY OF ACTION: Building and Zoning Department Recommendation: Approval Hearing Examiner Decision: Approved with conditions. BUILDING & ZONING The Building & Zoning Department Report 3 DEPARTMENT REPORT: was received by the Examiner on August 8, 1986 PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Building and Zoning Department Report, examining available information on file with the application, and field checking the property and surrounding area, the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: The hearing was opened on August 12, 1986 at 9:25 A.M. in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. The following exhibits were entered into the record: Exhibit #1 - Yellow File containing application, proof of posting and publication and other documentation pertinent to this request. Exhibit #2 - Site Plan Exhibit #3 - Landscape Plan The hearing opened with a presentation of the staff report by the Zoning Administrator, Roger Blaylock. A review was given of this request and it was pointed out that the proposed 58,000 sq. ft. will be contained in two buildings. The uses are anticipated to be office, light retail and limited warehouse uses; the proposal is located in an area of large developments that have recently been developed and is an extension of the Koll Business Park. The site is 4.59 acres; there are 30 ft. right-of-way easements running along the property line to provide emergency access and general circulation for the complete project; utilities have been established in the area; each building has 10 access points for tenants, with the concept of walkways and courtyards blending, to create more accessible areas for employees.. Mr. Blaylock stated 20 ft. of perimeter landscaping is required but under the M-P zone there is a flexibility allowed in landscaping. The applicant is requesting to be permitted to use only 10 ft. along the perimeter with the other 10 ft. being moved to the building to soften the effect of the building. He stated the proposal complies with the MacKenzie/Saito and Associates SA-027-86 August 20, 1986 Page 2 Comprehensive Plan, and continued with a review of staff comments and issues. Continuing, Mr. Blaylock reviewed the traffic impact and stated the trip generation fee had been reduced by City Council action and the ERC has agreed the applicant can, at the time of occupancy, establish the traffic impacts, as the building is speculative in nature; at the time an application is issued for the building shell the applicant will be required to pay for a traffic signal controller modification at the intersection of East Valley Road and S.W. 41st street; there is a need for storm water retention to be designed into the project; the building will have to contain sprinklers, with hydrants to be located away from the buildings; and lighting is to be included in the courtyard areas that will be visible from the streets to add to the safety of those areas. In closing, Mr. Blaylock stated there does not appear to be any site design issues to be modified and recommended that the Site Plan as presented be approved. The Examiner called for testimony in support of this proposal from the applicant or their representative. Responding for the applicant was: Lynn Takeuchi 300 120th N.E. Bellevue, Wa. 98006 Mr. Takeuchi acknowledged agreement with the proposal as presented by Mr. Blaylock but requested clarification on the system development charge based on the square footage of the lot. He also questioned off-street utility improvement charges and was advised the charge referred to was for area-wide traffic improvements associated with major arterials, traffic signals, etc. and not the adjacent widening of S.W. 41st Street. He concluded with a request for approval by the Examiner and acknowledged he would provide a reduced Site Plan to be retained in the file for future reference. The Examiner called for further testimony regarding this project. There was no one else wishing to speak, and no further comments from staff. The hearing closed at 9:45 A.M. FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & DECISION: Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: 1. The applicant, MacKenzie/Saito and Associates, for Trammel Crow, filed a request for approval of site plan for a two building complex containing a total of 58, 000 square feet of office, warehousing and retail space. 2. The yellow file containing the staff report, the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) documentation and other pertinent materials was entered into the record as Exhibit #1. 3. The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) , the City' s responsible official issued a declaration of non-significance (DNS) for the subject proposal. 4. The subject proposal was reviewed by all departments with an interest in the matter. 5. The subject site is located on the southeast corner of Lind Avenue S.W. and S.W. 41th Street. (I: MacKenzie/Saito and Associates SA-027-86 August 20, 1986 Page 3 6. The subject site was annexed into the City with the adoption of Ordinance 1745 enacted in April, 1959, as amended by Ordinances 1756 and 1928 adopted in May, 1959 and December, 1961, respectively. The subject site was rezoned from its initial G (General) zoning to M-P (Manufacturing Park) zoning with the adoption of Ordinance 3016 adopted in March, 1976. The final plat was approved in August, 1979 with the adoption of Resolution 2288. 7. A separate environmental appeal had been filed but withdrawn after the applicant and City reached an accord on the imposition of traffic related improvements fees. 8. The subject site is level and is immediately adjacent to the existing Koll complex containing among other uses TC Colby'.s Restaurant. 9. The site shares a 30 foot common easements along the south and east property lines with its neighboring property. Fifteen feet are located in each property. 10. Proposed are two 'L' shaped buildings. Each building would contain approximately 29,000 sq ft of space. The primary use component of the complex would be office space, with minor contributions from warehousing and retail uses. 11. The buildings will be arranged around a central court area containing both landscaping and parking. The ends of the shorter legs of the "L's" will be facing each other to present a 'U' shaped complex open to the south. A potential second phase component would be a mirror image complex immediately south of the current complex which would create a four building complex surrounding a central courtyard. 12. The buildings will be tilt-up painted concrete panels finished in aluminum and glass. The top of the parapet wall be be 16 feet above ground level. As proposed each building would have a total of 10 entrances. 13 . The exact nature of the spaces will- be decided upon completion and upon marketing, as each tenant will initially be provided with options on the division of space. 14. The inner court will contain a mix of parking and landscaping. Some of the landscaping areas are expanded into small patio areas. Additional landscaping emphasis will be provided by the shifting of landscaping from the perimeter of the site to the interior courtyard and along the edges of the buildings as permitted in the M-P district. 15. Access to the site is provided by driveways along both Lind and S.W. 41st directly onto the subject site. In addition, driveways correspond with the 15 foot easements along the east and south boundaries of the site. 16. Pedestrian pathways generally connect the outer parking areas with the inner courtyard. CONCLUSIONS 1. The subject proposal appears to serve the public use and interest. The proposal is a low rise two building complex arranged around a well landscaped inner courtyard. 2. Pedestrian circulation is provided along portions of the exterior of the buildings and in the courtyard area. Additionally, the inner courtyard has small patio areas to break the parking concentration. A break in the exterior perimeter parking, rather than pedestrian reliance on the driveways, should provide pedestrian access to the public sidewalks. p A S MacKenzie/Saito and Associates SA-027-86 August 20, 1986 Page 4 3. The 16 foot high buildings should be compatible with adjacent development. The exterior treatment will generally blend with •surrounding development. 4. The mix of uses will also complement the adjacent development which is already a mix of service, small warehousing and retail uses. 5. The proposal appears generally compatible with the comprehensive plan, although a detailed analysis was not provided about the potential extension of retail uses around to the Lind and S.W. 41st intersection. DECISION The site plan is approved subject to the provision of more discretely defined pedestrian connections from the site to the sidewalks surrounding the site. ORDERED THIS 20th day of August, 1986. F J. FMAN HE ING EXAMINER TRANSMITTED THIS 20th day of August, 1986 to the parties of record: Lynn Takeuchi 300 120th N.E. Bellevue, Wa. 98006 TRANSMITTED THIS 20th day of August, 1986 to the following: Mayor Barbara Y. Shinpoch Councilman Richard M. Stredicke Richard Houghton, Public Works Director Larry M. Springer, Policy Development Director Members, Renton Planning Commission Ronald Nelson, Building & Zoning Director Glen Gordon, Fire Marshal Roger Blaylock, Zoning Administrator Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Renton Record-Chronicle Pursuant to Title IV, Section 3015 of the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 P.M. September 3, 1986. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for a review by the Examiner within fourteen (14) days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific errors relied upon by such appellant, and the, Examiner may, after review of the record, take further action as he deems proper. An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Section 3016, which requires that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk, accompanying a filing,,fee of $75. 00 and meeting other specified requirements. Copies of this Ordinance are available for inspection or purchase in the Finance Department, first floor of City Hall. The Appearance of Fairness Doctrine provides that no ex parte (private one-on-one) communications may occur concerning pending land use decisions. This means that parties to a land use decision may not communicate in private with any decision-maker concerning the proposal. Decision-makers in the land use process include both the Hearing Examiner and members of the City Council. • • • • 4�\ • SW 41st STREET I • I --- ,- -1e_--- �___n• Om f 7 ! I I o � . . -- : HILL I , i . . I i I� I k . I i SITE DATA �a'' •-I - --` I Ir • 4: - -1e-- AREA OF SITE WI-; u _ _ ___�1e �,I'—_�`.�• 1 i LOT T 200.075 of. Z8.:et I I I 1 I ��I i i : I I ; 144 - - -.u_.r20 -I�la-1•'. ��— o --••1� LOT 8 192.629 Sf CL.)N? 71i • 1 _ - •- - - - ""� I e AREA OF BUILDING 58,090 of Q Q:`:=7 �` � 0 •,•- •1 `- I /_ °7- % PARKING 238 spaces 200;:.`e1. I V i I,�_ --r • -' --- _ P-1 I SITE COVERAGE 29% I� T PARKING RATIO 4.18/1000 of °I r`-----0- .��-- 1 ••.____ - ' 4-1 STANDARD 175 spaces !1 =1 -' 1u� 1 A I B �� _o i _ • COMPACT 58 spaces 24% i - i I°� i ri 1 I1 I _- I°- I HANDICAP 5 spaces II -I ICI. c.► ._ i,II I r� o CC Z I - I I 'i II �I = LEGEND 0 • I-:- la I I // I I I`1 4)i I I I I I I I I. +io1 .— �- • 4 FIRE HYDRANT J W -r-i -_II- 8 - I;�I• LIGHT STANDARD wwv• o I �1 ii Y I. ` ' I° I EASEMENT C le, , I �. i 1I - ,I -- I!i -_ ' ---- PROPERTY LINE CC 1 -p 1 7.0. TRASH DUMPSTER G !• I 1 \11 ' sI j --- - h • I — .. FREE-STANDING SIGN Q W :-ar-:1J 1 i�.r __ — 1 _ , I`i � 1 i �.r.� STORM SEWER LINE CC ` Z /• ' II __ __i_ 1 11 1 I •�.e� WATER LINE f"' i it • 1 . I I SANITARY SEWER LINE > / / / 1 III ---- _.:_�:�._�r- • _- -I Q • 20' 141� 20' +a_ I _- 1 124• II'1e- 2e' 1 •-te•- 7e• 1-8:.1e• ,-, 124' II' xe• 'Ta'a-la 5' f3 l• . . iL _ • . �, °_ --•-".j I t ! °!----- �° '\ �/I 20'WATER RI0N7-0E-WAY L -__-.-j t - �4 __ --__I0 - `\ .w--- T I i 1 -474.a' ' `,- ---------- {"16'BASEMENTFOP SANITARi SEWER I� �� ��- as • ' y, ------___-----i-- -1-. ....-' ,.' ) r //r \ al ..„,..-.' I > III -'a / 4 SITE / il• :i I Est/ ;) .. aw 41.1 err2 41 ,\. ' . i i ; aW 47rA 8T Y \'•. \ - . LOTS • ro \ 1^ ! III '/ \' -� 111 e I-1J a• •i itto o N. -�z" i / i r II• \ I ` � 'an4,ea i • `s�'0 /• i ti ..son arc•c 7'e% `l-) / ` VICINITY MAP _ -• ' T le'WATER RIGHT-OF-WAY- rT.d:EA3EIdERTF6A"FAYINb E QRa7lL`RNi - 1 1 • I N at 34'37'W 57e.e0' • • � SITE PLAN '"'• ' I mu tt_ SCALE:1':30•-0' a•n 1 0 3 • • `•3eeen �\ -- .. .- • . ---- r I MacKenzie/Saito and Associates SA-027-86 August 20, 1986 Page 5 All communications concerning the proposal must be made in public. This public communication permits all interested parties to know the contents of the communication and would allow them to openly rebut the evidence. Any violation of this doctrine would result in the invalidation of the request by the Court. The Doctrine applies not only to the initial public hearing but to all Requests for Reconsideration as well as Appeals to the City Council. I 4;:::-..i . - 14711, . /13 — .. . /------- 4 .L. [. GIs �•�" •� --+-�— - - _ Y ;ri,. . , , ,4 VA&IE 1ERAt I ! I >. : P/' HOSPITAL ;fs J 11 $ u- .I ^ OP/ • 'n.w to It f.•,.• 1:. r't3a�a f L-1 I R-3• • R-3 1 , R_2 _. • I . 1 1 I . 1C4‘tic: r G. '1' ."/" . f '' Lt,'-' '' ' : il 1 . 11 MacKENZIE/SAITO AND ASSOCIATES • 11 1 A. SA-027-86 • I 1, ' APPLICANT MacKENZ EjSA.ITn ANn ASsarTATFS TOTAL AREA ±4 .59 ACRES 11 PRINCIPAL ACCESS LIND AVENUE S.W. AND S.W. 41st STREET ; EXISTING ZONING M-P, MANUFACTURING PARK • EXISTING USE UNDEVELOPED L '' PROPOSED USE INDUSTRIAL PARK COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN COMMERICIAL f COMMENTS ij 1 • j4 ,- • . • :6'. .4111.110 •i • •sO 0 g WO°g•gO0'•. • • • ,.,...''W ...' '0 III' •-• •.•0'• 1 ei Le ..0000,°023Eist • • ',,I ••.' Am •...• •;11. • 4.'..M..../.1 N ::'.......%" ' ' voilib:ik''' . ' '.(.1/.•,..'• iiIii1:.41..- ' • ' 11/4`11136041 0: 1 • • • • •Jp..-.....-....-4...1,..41 „...,•am 0:ogq,0* 111.111111 far 40 e,....., . ss, . Ihmillhie.' . moo . .„ , ...• . . . , .-.-i I . ..6o.g;g.;:dallillit 4'... •:$.4/ i ..,. . Str.. , - . :::::: tgggggggoogi-4:ggg-g7 ---, ------iiii--- ,• Hill ,gowoggggsog cV• ail ,is. I girt!ii _.....i:.! •.. oo.oc,o,00000,4.? 1113.'i MIMI ili, L'cloo'co°'-'0°-',.;./.; o'•illillil:-"i la:-efi --?.. •1,:i. --... Illi°:gohoogg.ogoologgigolis;g;;.0.L.01: latigill, ''.. '4', '''' • - •Aon'on\. ..3 :0'siisop; .4.1111141114111.110 0 0 0 0 . \ • II MI AO REMO .4 e l'•. n-lila ruirn :°°. kt.44,:liNa • • ':• , ier .."IIIIIIIIIIk dar....4 111.1:21 , -,.--• .„ '. L: •.%.*,. away. r.o7 V' -•• [ t .. 1?..•,3;‘,...,,A; - • Irr 4,4.-;;;I:::!••-0.goSogog .,...... .- .419w..;„ .tcy ... IN!: .... flan MM., 1/•'''' ' ...'''''1).eiV.......44k?"!414/. IIPPOir .1,3.. f,, 0 0 0 0 0 ' f..."11111•01:,...,.eic!..ifr,,,,,t, • r f• ) ammo •000000 I i'. .• . j.il,, • , i.'..4- . •,0 ' I in- •00 0 0 . 0 ..1,..•.........,, .,•,. .. . , .....•:,, ,,,0 0 0 o 01 . •,.... c •*4{7 .. .bh•!,.. v #1::!el so I.• 0°0°0°0°0 .6:•ID 6 6•::::jr;t; (1"1 VA; •'' ...'' • '•':,1•!...!•` n/-)'.'. gIiIi*:::,.... 1.'‘41' 14361:143.5 .".118,,s ,a 4.88 NW OktiVI nnn .1.:-.\-------t7----"4T"'"!:r'.1.1:21.::::',-•-%,c,',/ :4114' ..." 'citk. ' , -J.,, - ,c--4„ - ..ignOmi::::...:.-•-it' fc...i:,!;:iP:o: 3,.,.....--,..„ fir &,. „I. ra,„ - iii...; es 41••••at onoo• - •-nir.or..l& .• ::' '4' ••.^ ..K::::*K::::g:ii:iiiiiiiRiiii::::::.:...‘%.*A;',1,vvfl;:;,. \• "16. 49.1! 01111111011••0111 SWIMS SI..•-. •••••••s.... '.AMMO ''%.' ''. 1., 4::::::•::::::::::•:•:::•:•:•:•:•:•:::-:::::•:•::::•:•:•::::•:...1.... ,-....:.,‘,,-;,.. •sw /../.op NMI !!!!!!!!!:,ti.. -'•,•-•''''')-,..=\r.•., - , :,... p ..,ii:::(:::::,%:•:::::*:::::::•:•:••••••,,,••,...:.• -, •.%;:o.N se,,,,t,-.0,4%. ilk ....minir II.mII1 n ail nn risme ea input ,••• '..1',1 i',;'',',',• - • ..:SM:.0•.e?•',, .0 :RI,WA •.• '- ".":14.:::,e.':' IN ,„„,_fr),.........„.v.... 1..:.... • .• -...:,•-. • . r .............,.....::;:•::: a,...)r% 0.. ' •AO O 1111111/* .Lois tot:dim! imumiser •11111111641 ONP• I:II .'s.'I./'.n SAN:0 4•Als:;:'.C. ..-------------4-------------;VI'''‘.:: ‘',%•••..._M 022411111: 4 .*•,, . 1pr', satay.--, , . ..,„ . •Tri,.....„ / • . ,: • .::::§::.::::1::,.:%.;!:: ,......'1 mums, itv.,4.0..; , .. :,,....,......„ .... ._-_-_-_-.-_-:7-_-_,•--_-_-_- 'ri.,.••::i*::::.:•:•:•:•:•:,:•:•:::::::.::: ,aoEF 1:1\1•::"..."..." ••:•'''' ' .1111* . \ ..- •.••,, .,...z.rx • •- - • ....zr-v '..•.: - . •::i:X„::::i*..:;• . ' c.------ .•.,,--r.,..v-----------_ • . .•,••;:ft:iiiiiii:i:i:i*i:i:1:i:ii•i:::::i:i*ii::Iiiiiii motto ,. ,040,A S.gal IS t•:::••..,, ,,,c, . . , ' . ' ''i V.:;:e.i::', ' 1:0;•,-' •.'i rd.!,:..f). -_-----------_ -`•,;.2 ,• ••:ti:1:i:i:i*i:i*:•.i::::::::::::' s' 1 UM/• .4••/:/,, •:‘,.;•I/ ' •.:. '1-'`•••••:', , *:'::‘_',..'',. b: •0 4.' '''',...• --- -- ----- '''......., '':: :iiiii:i:I:i./ • In II,., :X I'M,,,,,,,,k ; •:••• •• Ill 1 ',.•-..,; :..!: 1,;'•1---...,,;.• ,N•••.,„ '4": .;',;.p.::.:11i. • ..r'''• •••:P. :_-Afirma..-_-_-__ ......, ••••,:•:::i . ,.,:,...N..,,,,,, s..,,,4 ti) ..: --,. 1 vr. -,-,,- _.,- e ----odkii--------------------- „ , .a.1 rf.,,0 :!•1: . 1 -,• ,, ,,.... • ,..• ,,,,Aw.at ' i ' 16, • •... . .. • I'. . / i t: _--------- •.-- . ..=.---_-...--_--_--_--_---_-_-- .:* .. 0.7...• . - . 1.00. 72:1_---__--7-21-- --__:- :-. i:::::: Pijillasi :ggg' :Hi:: IMOSUILL?°,'Itgill.111 .. Adgmilann , 2 g .,,. . . ., ...z:..7....7.z. .0000000000000000000000•...C. , ._..-.,. :-..._-__2_-_ I 1 Hi :III ILI I MI".8.il.a 111•ill ill ( fief ...o.."-- , i C ir v eT '*,,L't.,..:, . . .....___._.0.05100:000%04600x0.:.%.,-__:_-__:_-_::: _ :::.....ed. .......-. 4._, : : , ... ....,,..... ;h., ".,-,,e. rr 1. .•,,V.... C.,0,0000000000000000000000000:00'•:::.,. _.I.P16._ ,r ._el-.4.0,7014.7---;,0-61A1,ev i 1 efi: ..;.7.•;;, ....-.,.,,,,., .,..c... ......:000:.0...0............:........,.,;....._,_____,..__ s,:;les..,.. ._,,,..1.ffro 41,1 bsibb.....7._.. ,. ... ,,,,Av 1:111111. • -.-, .' T.., -:!,:,1/44-t%'.,*.: ,...7; . i, "Ct ! ...........:.....:_ ••%es* :.0.• • . .... .001,,--r---7,'"___2___:.-1011.1111111011116-----±-,-- fig Adoir....41,.............::::: :::::::::::::. 1.3.,7':,',:. t: Ebb,. ,•::::::•:::::::::::::::::::•••::::::::::• .,•. •-..,,,, ....„,....-•„,....... ik ,_ •::i:i:i.*::i::::,:::-.i:x:i:i.: ,... . ,:,...•• . . f 4 - ..111;; Ii--i1111:::tfiZilitlill 11141/4' /A •;11111 '''---1,as:Vii n a;;;l 1 .---- ----- 4 4, ` ':::::!i':::.:M:;:: .,' . •: . '' '.'.- " .............. .. • :• .•-•.. .„.....; ...- ••• • ''• )118-......':::i:..: I .1.-- ......., ,,,,‘, :3:41 I IIIII ems , _ . _ ---_-_-_-_- .6- 11, ?ci ''.:::. •••••., .••4-7" --- i__F •• .11140C e• • •. III. 11:1171:01- -- "1 ei ------- •••••': oo '•'•:•:. ,... 1 • .' ..t.:•••, • • • MIS I I IN; . - ..... .o.00.00..0. 'I' .1•11,--.. • • • 'WWI ',I. - •"- .41 • , •0.0.0' --- ,‘J•- • • • rim salmi 6.0.0 * ma a duo% _I.:•.•:•:•::::::::,-:- .•-: a'.-.-.' ' lais i co; •, WI ' • , ,.in a ,' --_-:: _-:-;:-_--p000000,-_:::::: .;2:;:`, t Amninn./ . II In I --........ ' 1 ; 1 :.: moor, A ::•:,: •:.•-45 1•1111110/ '.. 1111511 11 I 111 (1•• - ----- -----]-2--- :- '•:3.4.;:;', •••••-••••i111•01111 1E1 1111111110/11, •%,•1110114‘ FA11111160111111 • --- - ------- ------ -- -•,••••r. • . --- -" •• ill.iws•a. -1/1111111:1111111/../1. 4 0., ' '•:-:•:•• D 7 - ".. 1 I CV Ill . ad...4 s 1, ., '..., f•• Witlintalettlli'44';c ......:..000000• '..) II•{1.1 ...III .611.111.811"•9'y , , ' ' - -- -'.•i.i... .0000 JAN.*: : ..:.30' 0000000 \ .1,8•1161 •••• ••••III I./:/..7_7..7_ as/1E06m, _-_-_-_-_-_-.-_ ./.s:cr; .000000/00.1:INA'..•7, ,:i •_0_0 0030• 7 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 ism at,s e ete7,.....:,,!la .00.00. .c.C.T,..> 0000.0• -,',mem ems t.:,,,:, ig.,...2_ 00000 tr.... r, 0000000 1 -..., -1--1 : um?0 ____ , ,000. .000000 -iiiimps - •''' •, •• •--- • ' ms•"el J:k:::'1 - 7:11tty- , ._--_--_-:- lag-ma:_--_-' ..x. ,...„0,..... $1111 lee ,.. i , Si .11...;.,$ lilt • ••,,00000' III le 6.5.1. sett vtar ,..i i w II; i•Pil.;;;.:c.:I i r zw..'.:.,,,T,P.7.. o ---._ •----_a -_-_ , . I -4. '• 'c'.1%thr. •••••:....J - `.• e• ;,:c .1.. .i r)e'•0.•'•.• •' -••:„*;.•',.....•?,• _-_-_--_-_-_-_-_-_ -_-_-,•-',r r,.. , .•;:.!3...,C-...r,,* --------- ---.ft,. 1.. .-. ip• • • ...,.. • t.7.;•• -------- 7------ ----_ ---- --> ___ ...k ..6 I-: •- - .. .... • • bh .....•.. ...-',. - ... ft' .:.:.i:.:.'.. ..:-: ... L....... •• .., ( ...ft il :::::::...::.:::i:i*i:i:i:i:i: ...., .:::::::::::::::::::::..I •HIM. I 011101.111L I • •:••• :•::::::::: :70.08INPLILAssila. ,.:- :.._.••---_--- -- ... /,f' ,....-•-•....•-.... --1'i'--._;....s: ..,,,,,,0„..... ,.: .4 0,1 i rd.1/'''';•---..;.:.':,' .•a 4 I I 1 4 t 1 I I 8•4 0' w '., `11•101i1911111' r - IN I•- •- I a I 111.1 I I I.'•'Os 300°01100000.• j 1 t.:8 ' ''' pi•.:,,_ gm; 1.,s..k .,, -__ „1, ........-::.:_:-....__.-...._t-.....-......,:•1 •0000000e.... •,,,,e. i .I . „ g ',,:4.fa i• . ,..,,,,./ "lig e Z,1 e-...--_-___-:,' - -J riZte , ^mil 1. 000000000 00000. •-••••••1 , ',um 0000000• AO' .. o_o 0 o o o.. ......7-:,./ . •:...1,ift:;;;:•.1' 1•1.ay •0 0000000..• •j- ..: .Na .,„....,2 .---.- ./..--.., 1111 . . . :* .... .••0000 -,..... • ....*, M4000000 ::::::•:•: :,.41••cre' © • q •! i ; LAND USE -.ELEMENT • •.. 1110- - I 1 . - •, $ . . 1 . . . 1 . • .. . II 1 4 / I . . i • la: e I I i • , '.• u Single Family i, .....••1 Commercial 1 . , ,1 ..:•:•:.:•:•:•:•:.:::.• •A. N• V :':.:.:.:.:''''''.:.: Low Density • . • mily i ••:•:•:.:.:.:.:.:.:, •k Office / Office Park • c ,:•:.:•:.:.:.:•:•:.:•: Multi-Fa . . , • .:•:.:•:.:.:.:.:.:.:• .N.. . • . .• • , • . .c„:,....,. .;'1 •iiiiiniiii:i:i, Medium Density ..c,...D.. ..„,,c,..,:, .., . r ublic/Quasi-Public . , :•:.:.:.:.:„.,.,.:•,•:•:.: 0.00,,... • , • Multi-Family .......c. oc,c.c.....: • . . . • . i• - - • . . ....x.:„....,....„:„:::•::: . -- ----- • . T:. iiimium High Density -::::::::1:i:am::::4 Light Industrial • iv?1, .:::::::::: Multi-Family . • , • . . . . •. • ; • ,i,..t,,,, •, • • . • ,-.• ••ise. Heavy Industrial . • ''' )• "crt Recreation . . ••',,,• 1 • • • ,• .. . - . \ . 2 • ' • _ .__ •• _ • '4 / . _-_-_-_-_- f. 1 10 .. , Greenbelt _:_-:_= :_- Manufacturing Park . . !•rt,:•; .,:. / multiple Option - ___ 3020Z CITY OF RENTON HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING AUGUST 12, 1986 AGENDA COMMENCING AT 9:00 A.M. : COUNCIL CHAMBERS, SECOND FLOOR, RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING The applications listed are in order of application number only and not necessarily the order in which they will be heard. Items will be called for hearing at the discretion of the Hearing Examiner. NW SPINAL REHABILITATION Application for conditional use permit to allow expansion of medical offices in a P-1 zoned district, file CU-036-86; property located at 3921 Talbot Road South. SIMPSON REZONE/SHORT PLAT Application to rezone approximately 0.59 acre from G-1 to R-1 (file R-037-86) ; application for short plat approval to subdivide said property into three (3) single family lots (file SHPL-038-86) ; application for waiver of required off-site street improvements (file W-039-86); and application for variance to maintain the current 30' wide roadway along Morris Avenue South instead of required 60' width (file V-066-86) ; property located 513 South 15th Street. TRAMMELL CROW Application for site plan approval to build two buildings fo 58,000 square feet to be used as office, small retail and limited warehouse, or industrial park, file SA-027-86. Property is located on the southeast corner of Lind Avenue S.W. and S.W. 41st Street. s-- 3034Z BUILDING.AND ZONING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING..EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING AUGUST 12, 1986 APPLICANT: MacKENZIE/SAITO AND ASSOCIATES ' FILE NUMBER: SA-027-86 • A. SUMMARY & PURPOSE OF REQUEST: ' The applicant seeks site plan approval to construct two buildings of 58,000 square feet to be for office,:small retail and limited warehouse uses. B. GENERAL INFORMATION: . 1. Owner of Record: Trammell Crow 2. Applicant: MacKenzie/Saito & Associates 3. Location: (Vicinity Map Attached) Property located on the southeast corner of Lind Avenue S.W. and S.W. 41st Street 4. Existing Zoning: M-P, Manufacturing Park . 5. Existing Zoning in the Area: M-P, Manufacturing Park ' 6. , Comprehensive Land Use Plan: Commercial 7. Size of Property: ±4.59 acres 8. Access: Lind Avenue S.W. and S.W. 41st Street 9. Land Use:. Undeveloped ' 10. Neighborhood Characteristics: ' North: Light Manufacturing/Warehousing East: •Warehousing/Commercial South: Commercial/Office West: Light Manufacturing/Office • C. HISTORY/BACKGROUND: Action . ' File Ordinance Data • Annexation --- 1745 Apr. 4, 1959 - Corrected --- 1764 May 19. 1959 - Corrected --- 1928 . ' Dec. 12, 1961 Rezone (G to M-P) R-636-69 3016 - March 8, 1976 Special Permit SP- -_ --- ' Oct. 13, 1976 Temporary Plat TP-239-78 --- Preliminary Plat PP-266-78 --- Feb. 26, 1979 Final Plat FP-362-79 Res 2288 Aug. 13. 1979 Site Approval SA-269-78 --- - Jan. 19, 1979 Preliminary Plat PP-086-77 ' --- May 30. 1978 Final Plat FP-278-79 Res 2254 March 26, 1979 D. PUBLIC SERVICES: ' 1. Utilities: a. Water: A 12-inch water line is located along S.W. 41st Street and a 16-inch water.line is located along Lind Avenue S.W. and along the southern property line. PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER MacKENZIE/SAITO & ASSOCIATES, FILE NO. SA-027-86 AUGUST 12, 1986 •";>, PAGE 2 b. Sewer: An 8-inch sanitary sewer line is located near the southeast property line.. c. Storm Water Drainage: Storm water currently drains into the Springbrook Creek drainage:system. 2. Fire Protection: Provided by the City of Renton as per ordinance requirements. 3. Transit: Metro transit route 0199 operates along Lind Avenue S.W. adjacent to the subject site. 4. Schools: a. Elementary Schools: N/A b. Middle Schools: N/A c. High Schools: N/A F 5. Recreation: Recreation opportunities in the immediate area are not yet available to employees. E. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE ZONING CODE: 1. Section 4-730, Manufacturing Park (M-P). 2. Section 4-744(F)(2), Green River Valley Landscaping Requirements. 3. Section 4-738, Site Plan Review (See Ord. 3981). F. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR OTHER OFFICIAL CITY DOCUMENT: 1. Industrial Goal and Objectives, Policies Element, City of Renton, Comprehensive Plan Compendium, March 1986, p. 18-19. 2. Valley Comprehensive Plan, City of Renton, Comprehensive Plan Compendium, March 1986, p. 31-50. G. DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS: 1. The applicant, MacKenzie/Saito & Associates, representing the Trammell Crow Company is requesting site plan approval to allow the construction of two buildings containing 58,000 square feet of office, small retail and limited warehouse uses. ;;The intent is to create an industrial park with low intensity uses. • The two buildings are identical to one another and will be constructed of tilt-up painted concrete panels with aluminum/glass store fronts. The top of the parapet wall will be 16' from ground level. The building will be painted white or gray. A total of 10 access points per building will be provided to - allow the division of the building into small offices and manufacturing spaces. The applicant is proposing moving ten feet of the required perimeter landscaping adjacent to the building to soften the aesthetics of the structure. The two L-shaped buildings are located on the 4.59 acre site to create a U-shape opening to the south. The intercourt yard is focused more towards people with a central plaza and several patios. The ultimate intent would be to flip this building design and create a total development of four buildings with a central courtyard. The central courtyard will not only include pedestrian areas but parking areas for access to the inner portions of the building. , . 2. The proposal as submitted complies with the Comprehensive Plan designation of Manufacturing Park/Multiple Option. The project proposal is consistent with the dimensional regulations imposed by the M-P, Manufacturing Park, zoning designation. • • PRELIMINARY REPORT T THE HEARING EXAMINER • MacKENZIE/SAITO & ASSOCIATES, FILE NO. SA-027-86 AUGUST 12, 1986 PAGE 3 3. The Environmental Review Committee has issued a declaration of non-significance on the project subject to conditions imposed in a letter dated June 18, 1986. The applicant initially appealed those conditions but has subsequently withdrawn the appeal based upon a clarification letter dated July 28, 1986. That letter reduced the trip generation fee from $270 to $188 with the understanding .that Trammell Crow could present actual traffic data in determining traffic impacts as the project was developed. The following is a series of conditions imposed and accepted by the applicant: 1. Participation in area-wide traffic improvements identified by the pending CH2M Hill study to the project's proportionate share based upon estimated daily traffic generated as calculated by the standards established in the Institute of Traffic Engineers Trip Generation Manual(Third Edition-1984). The maximum cost per vehicle trip shall not exceed $270 per trip. The final cost per vehicle trip may be reduced as determined by the CH2M Hill study or as determined by the City Council. ' 2. . The payment of traffic mitigation fees for the speculative building shall be divided in the following way: ' a. At the time of building permit application for the building shell, Trammell Crow will pay the amount of $10,000 in cash to pay for the traffic signal controller modification at the intersection of East Valley Road and S.W. 41st Street. b. A 'bond shall be submitted at the time of building permit application'for the building'shell in the amount of $112,050 minus the $10,000 cash per condition 02a above. ' - [This is estimating 100 percent of the estimated cost of development of a "pure office park". This is based on 14.3 vehicle trips 'times 58 times $270. The 14.3 vehicle trips per 1,000 square feet was utilized instead of the 17.7 vehicle trips because the ultimate project will be in excess of'100,000 square feet.] The bond may be adjusted by the Building Official based upon the final cost per vehicle trip as determined by the.CH2M Hill study or as determined by the City Council. The bond shall have an expiration date of five years. However, the intent is that all • off-site mitigation will be completed no later than January 1, 1988. c. The applicant shall establish a database tracking system for the individual tenant 'improvements in the project. The tenant improvements shall be determined at the time of building permit application based upon the following 1984 Third Edition Institute of Traffic Engineers criteria: Warehouse 5.01 vehicle trips for every 1,000 sq. ft. Office space 14.3 vehicle trips per 1,000 sq. ft. Manufacturing/ 3.99 vehicle trips per 1,000 sq. ft. Assembly Area Industrial Park 7.0 vehicle trips per 1,000 sq. ft. d. Prior 'to the issuance of an occupancy permit for any individual tenant; the applicant, tenant, owner or assignee shall replace the underlying bond with a cash deposit to the Finance Department or the traffic improvements must be installed. PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER _ MacKENZIE/SAITO & ASSOCIATES, FILE NO. SA-027-86 AUGUST 12, 1986 PAGE 4 3. Since the Environmental Review Committee is waiting upon additional information to prioritize the necessary traffic improvements in the entire Green River Valley Planning Area as determined by this CH2M Hill study (covered by bond as outlined in condition 2 above), they cannot prioritize at this time the specific improvements 'the developer can accomplish in lieu . of actual cash payment of fees The Environmental Review Committee will provide by September 11. 1986. the developer with a prioritization of needed traffic improveme is and a construction schedule. 4. The applicant shall provide funds in the amount of $3,500 at the time of building permit application for the shell of the buildings-to complete the master recreation plan for the" Green River Valley in lieu of providing actual off-site public recreation. The funds shall be deposited into a special account to be utilized by the Parks .and Recreation Department for preparation of the appropriate recreation master plan. 4. Various City departments have reviewed the proposal. The Building Division and the Parks and Recreation Department have recommended approval without conditions. The Design Engineering, Utility Engineering and Traffic Engineering Divisions of the Public Works Department along with the Fire Prevention Bureau and the Police Department 'have recommended approval with conditions. The Zoning Division originally recommended denials of the project. The department comments are as follows: POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT: APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS April 9, 1986. The subject proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan land use designation of Commercial'and the existing M-P zoning of the site. It is also compatible with the surrounding land use in the vicinity. The dumpster location may be considered to be relocated, however. DESIGN ENGINEERING-DIVISION: APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS. 1.' Storm water retention/detention required at time of development. L' 2. Complete all street and utility,improvements. UTILITY ENGINEERING DIVISION: ' . NOT APPROVED. Needs full plan for fire`hydrant relocation. System development charge - sewer - $8,003 TRAFFIC ENGINEERING DIVISION: APPROVED ` April 1, 1986. 1. Development should participate in the traffic signal controller replacement to improve intersection control at East Valley Road and S.W. 41st Street.. STAFF RESPONSE: (ERC required payment of $10,000 to modify traffic signal controller.) 2. Developer should participate in Valley transportation improvement assessment at $175 per trip generated. The total assessment will be determined at time of site plan submittal when square footage of each type of usage is known (office, retail and warehouse). Estimated cost for general office usage only would be as follows: 58,000 divided, by '1,000 times 17.7 times 1.75 equals 179,655. STAFF RESPONSE: (ERC has determined amount as a result of their own action of June 18, 1986 and subsequent Council action.) V • PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER • MacKENZIE/SAITO & ASSOCIATES, FILE NO. SA-027-86' AUGUST 12, 1986 PAGE 5 ; FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU: . APPROVED,WITH CONDITIONS ' March 28, 1986. 1. All UFC codes, sprinkler requirements". and water 'supply requirements are required. 2. Hydrant not to be closer than 50 feet to the building. Relocate existing hydrants. POLICE DEPARTMENT: APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS April 1, 1986. 1. Unless there is additional lighting not shown on the,site plan, I see additional lighting needs for this project. 2. Lighting is needed for the walkway between'the two buildings for •the personal safety of customers and employees. 3. Lighting, security glass and high security locks are needed on all courtyard entrances. This courtyard will be totally out of sight of any patrol or passing motorist. This building will experience commercial burglary and the point of entry will be the courtyard. ZONING DIVISION: NOT APPROVED April 8, 1986. A twenty (20) foot landscaped setback is required along S.W. 41st Street (10 feet is shown). STAFF RESPONSE: (Under the Manufacturing Park zone, perimeter landscaping can be transferred to other locations of the subject site. The applicant has shown this and is requesting approval based upon that relocation.) 4. The general site plan criteria established under Section 4-738(D) are complied with by the proposal. ; a The applicant has reduced the intensity of the project to reduce traffic noise and; pedestrian, intensity on the subject site. Adequate on-site circulation and access to the individual tenant users is provided in the design of the building. The applicant's relocation of perimeter landscaping'to the edge of the building softens the building and provides some open space more usable to the occupants. • There are no on-site natural amenities that need to be preserved. Also, there is no need to screen the building from other adjacent uses since the other uses are compatible in scale and intensity with the proposal. 7. The site plan does not present any major design issues. All of the critical development decisions were related to off-site Omprovements affecting the transportation system. The provisions accepted by the applicant from the Environmental Review Committee •modify the application. H. DEPARTMENTAL RECOMMENDATION: Based upon the above analysis, it is recommended that the site plan request, file SA-027-86, by MacKenzie/Saito Associates for the Trammell Crow Company should be'approved as presented. . 1 Ir y1 -1-Nit ' c 'Rn i M ' . " i...-1.---...- ' iS 11Friiiii-4..• • , I. -------. LA: .,, •••e. a 9 WNW, AS V4llEY GENERAL. •4•�0 9 h P/' ` HOSPITAL I ;-eoi" P sc. • " a9/, � fig )7,1/. 8 1 . I •re-.19 to tJ ' ---.-4.110. 1 , /1 ' 1 11 i , 11 ..1111.3. . ---;L--.-.-..... f ► N / • ;1 r Pr I '11 , . . ii 1 , i, . • --1 illl ' L _ . ; I r. , 1 • . il ;----1 . .u.),.., , if /1 . ,; •'a -- i • "� I Ii, II I r MacKENZIE/SAITO AND ASSOCIATES • h SA-027 -86 1 h • 1 TTn APPLICANT MacKENZTFfSA ANn AR$OCTamF.S TOTAL AREA ±4.59 ACRES I } PRINCIPAL ACCESS LIND AVENUE S.W. AND S.W. 41st STREET 1 1 EXISTING ZONING M-P, MANUFACTURING PARK I . EXISTING USE UNDEVELOPED PROPOSED USE INDUSTRIAL PARK i fi COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN COMMERICIAL COMMENTS II 1 4 f i i . . - . iiiiii'.. ...'9: :•:.• • 111 /1 ill. ••• , .. .0. ' Qu ' ° ''• • 0 0 ' .;a r 1.• • • • • •-• ,....in •00000000.o.• •:-,,ow •,0000000, . , 0 0 'Pi)t;A:.:,::•.0:.•irie 0.'.0 • „.... • •::...4.' ....'" • 'I. 1 .0. ...LI: •••gO°0°0°0°, 0 • • 11,..--- =.411••• • • • • . •. 111•116WV, .e. .°. 1 , ,.. ,,, 000000,0. , - 111 WOE/ "I 10 • • • • 4 ;......:: .000.0.050. , 1131 • .• • •-... 4 I , 46 Aolorl -40, o „.oeo„ • .•_•i•_•. aim • . a .idif ,•gil gogesogog• Ptbl*•gogo. Z1 orme....• . ,,. •• .;;;;WA I ,•„,„. -,:,,,'ISI •-,3 jis. Liip,,c°,1i.w.0.... .1.,:(!,..:, 4".!II illitrol: IN - V/• . :, -- •,„.. 1 .1 Mini °,ggggggOgOggggc3`6•Y •.gg•1 tipaiiii",,:--: L'IS'i. ' ' Ns .0000000000000g0g00 me 0 0 0 0 0 0 00000,• °°01 ..0•111// 6. Illa - - ^ k*,..4troingLiffr, Ay 111%,....._ till:11.1•••••••16111161•11:5 ei 1 in mos am_sae 110 -I tursiT Algilant 11111177•711.-:It- iiiiii.N,*41:1131:??1 7/1 Aill• %,•••Cca,:'•2•.`,7444i,tt,„_-. -.11111111111111111111111111111111141/4 • ••40(4041:..... --J*ca.°0.°O°0. 111111110/, •. --AEU • • 0 0 0 0 i .1;1:1•1.4,t7. . 1,1•1112•1°. .t.r.(t :-.,.I.: .-. [ ..1, 6 1.( AI '0 4-itsiL Witt i ,:, flgr:::::1:44K,E°E IV•tailinlitliv • ." .0 1‘ •••••• •..11', 1111140k,,e,, . Also Swim..°0°0°0 0°0 a••••••tim,„). • ri,,,,,.„ 4, FV,,. n z• • 'MAW/o . •111...,.1111••1111/L•41C 0 ;4y .. • .....................••••••••... .. !t•(•,' 0(r, J,,. • & itiNit... ,) , .:::iiiii::: :::.,... • . , ?...„ ..„ ...„..,___..:__ _.....•1.........fiit •00 ' --0434.....116 Alk Hoes soppossionmai ,000.0.' ._ -a ,Au . '1 •::iiM:iii:iMi::i:K:i::::•:::•..... '''SVI•ii.-e Vs,i'cci)ka. \ ism mum r No anises as . , ,, . _ .rung.1101.1.1!!!!!!!•.kay ••'::-.-:7-•• -• \ - , •`,. '1 .:::*:::::::::::::::::::*:.:•:-:.:'''..:...=." - ..‘......N ".4...1.,....q.,.,• , j5iraittr.: .. .. mom NT 00000.zat ".:''.:,.....,,:\ '. .4. .r I: :..i:N:i:i*i:i:i:i:x:/'„, ,,,,‘ ;.c?.;;Jii."•' ' '.:1.‘:'..;:c7v.:".•, \ . mg .11111111nAll Or .0/1!...1111111110 :•••:,... - 1.c1..t.y. :i*::]::*i:i:i:i:i:i:i:::i:. ,-...,,:,-r • - ___ :•,,,_. ,,.. . a. ,,• . :_e_•!!1W0,-.:112!!!!!! .r .. 4,4. \\. . -,k-si •-•• • irej• ... •- ,.. ..P.XX: \ :•-•:.:•:-. .. " JOEI 0000000 NO %04%, qiijk:Eig \ • •,•',':‘:.;`• "••• •::::::ii::iii::::: : T.:3• --__-_- --------- c):••.••••::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::.....x.:.:::: "moil . :'..?..... •,‘,,, • • ..,....... ,.......,0, E:vola. ! .-.,, ':'•! ' :::,::::::::::::::: ,. .....c..- .::•,....?,...,..„---_--_--.:-_--_--_ .„,_. ,.,..--:•::::i;i:x,Km::i:K,i,::::: , V li 00000 NMI UMW' ..,•,:lw r jril-. - \ 1::::i::::•• „,_.,•-- . - --- ,••••:::::::::::::::..::::::::::::::• isww: --- , ,4;,•,:..., ..-.---,n 0- r.,..... - -mp-mo-------- . .„•... ------ :- .,k.,"..,,;.a. ,:...? ..- ... .,,,,--,-, ...:______________-_-_-___-_ __-*:..i.o ' I„,,,,......„...• ..,.., Ng, ....• , \ •.. 4 _7f.. 1-4-•-••1. • ‘ E.:. ---..-0 tftat_ -. 1 ? FiT. f:!--,-47,1i-k . 1- ;',-.-tK7.±-2=7._:. ---f: ' T; Ic...f]..= . ( ( ----c-----/------=-----.: ,- r•(4:CZ 6. :", 0 ,.,,., ;,%:•0'.A:k*4 P IP•4 . -.1:-.F••••Aus \ft.w,,tri" •..aaaemet•• _ ••.--: •sc:. iiiiiiiiiii si umass IP MMMMM //MONNE , f' , 110•11p• mos salk:2,0,Rai •1. was Ns • sommeirigima-..eg• -o-o-o-a a 0003: , 4,.(..t.,;..0 00°0303:: '7- iff.$.1:.f•-_ 1 .- ••-•,0•0 II •l•.1 • :f i I t.:::.. v),„;. -- •00000000000•.C.:----- ---• -_-__ •000000000000.•,..,. -_-__-_-- -I-- 010 I ...;:iMii:.:.:......•' ,c.;:.•.:.;'.J,.... :-.;','[':.‘'.:•...:."..) __-_. - .2.: .4......i. ,„„f•rrs ,6,1011,0.00 i \ ' ore•n-C er, 00000000000000.:.: - • •0000000000000 ..; ' _,,, 14'07 •1 k - •na . - ' . ,..„-.)11c:iiii:i:iiiiii:ii:ii:i.:i:::i:•. ,:::•::::::.::•::::::.::.:*•::•::.:;.::.: ••• ..,;::,,.:..,.• •- r.r 0 • .--.'... ...7.;'>'4.. • 00.000.00.0.•, ---.___ . __ _ ...,..0 ilk„..__in..-- isot . ];ii:,i!•:,ii!iii,.:::1:: .c , ..."---\.., g o •.0_0_0_0_0_0.0•• . '1 'i.i • \., 00000 lo'0..•5 ---7- -oitte,„!•itAo.......-...20grA. my 414 ra... ..c.., , ... .. ,c:3 , ‘ ,. \ ................_j\el's °,3%°.• ....IV °IF ii---a_ ____, ------•-•'''' .- - .-:'"i.•• P. •••• ••••••• • ..;,,,,___. _-----__:________-----•--.. .„L;01--'"-khne, 410111111141 Ilk. "411.:MED.R? ,... •' •‘ . ...••. . .•, .-4\., ( . . '...."3"aiaNVINE12r283. kitAkk. ::: Ni:::.:.ai ::. 1 *. ,::. '.•'.;',..-.s•. '` - . .',..,,,,.. rn'i i . - :ii , 14#•*:::::*i:i:::i:i::. '• am• . . i''IIIIIPPPP..'"- I.a 4 Y..;. ei•••ii%.`... -_-_-.:____-_-_- _-_-_-_-_-• 1...•;',. VP* '0 *. 13 Ire MMMMM:A11::•'-• ------- -------- --------------- -' ;'' ,L Effir :0. .'.-..!., •:.4-7, ,....MMMMMM.,.......?„. ....:..: iv .000. .,:::i*....,,,•,,,. ..: _ • 00 7.fil••••:.: illli 1 '' • • 101 II MM 11 MM 1 '1 7- "L a • •-•000 _-_-_- ,•,. ............ , • .0:0°00 iii:ii:ii:iiii::•.'.,...- • ..mi ye , ii.ii • __ •,:,. . 1 ,,, . . in.1 11 ' ----- -------0000---- '..t.1:: - -• .*::::::::::::::.:.::.Ma ... Zirosiv.. . '111011 - - kI MEM .;%; .tisie . , :i•.gi:::::•:.i.::::.. . ; Imal '... tom i . ..... . . .. •%-•...-•musames•I / HMI 1 3•0 11 OE 1 il --- ------------ ------------ 'i..i • ------e'.••r' . ...••••••••••••.••••ii my ,',, maw r,.I '11111113, . 11/1/11.11010,.. .. , -7 - umuctirmn.si "•,...471 • • • .iig•cicio rio 0.-.'.:',N, 0 mow Iv womb. - .-iiel I,O 4• 0•-ri. - - -.,`L'"' •ocio°0%°.44 ' -•:•:•:•:0000000 1111 111..11' ,.ill •••iii X.:.:..0000000 .,.. ••■••as,-•.•-•III 000000• jansi•sis t?.-,01 00004 0000000..assai ape.:.•--on *-WM/. _-_-_-_- _-_-_------- - '.d?.1•••' •000• c•'- . :'.f •000000 !MOB VIII-.::fe,MS....2 EMI/0_ ill .,,,1 •,..!,.-_-itinyz., _ _ 31P-Z-1110:-.----_ tx• ••-. ,• j.00.00e .....-•1'.-.,,,, • 00000,:,`ION rel r•• I •• •0000'NMI;III•, +-1 ••1 11 '.il 1 ---- .,•• 199 4..! 1 r•--•....-;,-,,:' ---__-_-_-_--->: --:: ;•::• ii ...i..i:: ,,!:,,,,,..,..;,•,:f,cp.::, =_-_ ___ ___ .,,•• • 'V• t _ .crt - 0 -is •Pk I.:•••:,mason 4 ,--....., ••••• -- -- re„ . ,. . . ' triT,....0-0.-;i"i,;(j..?,•,,3.0!", •.-r• •••• ... --------- --- -, r (1146111111111 ..C.....:\"r.,... . ..0 .:•-I--,---) _-_'_.:.L.--_.._44t:..s,,..?4-?:... --- ------ -- ed --------- --- , . •,. N., , . .. 4 1 • lig wr .... ',..!'t --_--_-_---_-=-2-=---f---=--"--= *- -=-=--- -----7----=g -_--_-- rsi,-, • • • . ..y. .•••k • II- - ,•..)I12.:;","•7.•'est."'A.-;Jr i - --1•- _ ,0•. ' 1 • . • ::i::: .. '..".................:1:•••.•••• --- , ---41fr C------------- --:.- 3..fe . ......... •-•• • .:..•411111 .::x:x...,..:::•.:.:.:%:.:]1•:.:•:::::::7.;Isiss.inswallutomm.L. t :,...., _____________________7/_______ .________ ______- a An .c4.,..,........_ •- '---- -- -- .(4' .• 3.1. ---------------- .i• --_--_- -,•1-, %.---;ew --- .11.1 SW •• .00000• e,r•• •• • IlliZer4e311e------1..'..% i -•-- --".".--1%1•-• -••1•41 Int 10.?.' .00000970°00.A j•'••••:••(": ' I- ::: .0:%:.1•.111:.::+,:!..•::1:••.:1A::%. 711111111.;:r ( ,•.•,.?.'AWCY--,4 - i....... . :---:4:1)M69 I ...Ai,a nomps•o:Jr •000 000000000000i? •'!,...,, - .1.1i. 0000000••• _: L././.[". "Mai 64, P000:00000000000..• -i••It ...'". . ,...1 -0o0o0o0009300o.: ..,,,.,.:7•:... .:,It /..,..,.::.;.: II. IL . .. . .. •, , -.0.0-0...07.-000° 1 •„,„Oe M 00. •.:.:.,•:•,•:. .. .-_r_.•-I 1111 • * _____ • . • .' . •b . - /11111110.,- ; • . LAND USE ELEMENT • • .1 .., . . ,:-, , • • i I . Single Family Commercial • / . , - • - • •. . ; ::':':*•••:•;•:•:•:': Low Density • ::::::::::•:•:•:•:•:. • •• :•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•: Multl-Family 1 Office / Office Park : , . •:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:. \ . . • 1 • ... Mi .c„:,0.0.0c,...0,.edum Density , • .0,00000.00000. Public/Ouasi-Public, . ..c.c.. • , • ,i,i,i,i,i,i,i0i,i* Multi-Family 000..0. • • . . • - • - . .•, . . . . T . usiimili High DensityFamily , Light Industrial • Multi- • •• • • • . , . .•• . 1T.1 0.ti,' . • • • • n • zt - 701,,e.C4 Recreation '0'0°0 Heavy Industrial •. • •c5,,... o., • • • ,.• • v. . , - e,"t;...'n;r:o. . ___ t Greenbelt.• . •_-_-__ ----- Manufacturing Park , ,..-; - ._,A.;1.,-,..•,K.; ______ , -, • . , • , . . .: . , ,, / Multiple Option • , \•. • ...."•:.:, . . • . _.....1533. , „....t.„,,,... 711132M.111211111121121.11715727/: .___./ I .- . . REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION ; ,15'- 1-' 6 1 I ' APPROVED 0 WITH CONDITIONS 0 NOT APPROVED i . • • Y. r7.7.0:0'2-1_, • DATE: 3D�--��SI OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 • Form 182 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION ; _ r'3 nice. 1 • ' 0 APPROVED 0 APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS 0/, NOT APPROVED • A ILLV.,nyr-i (2,61 ) fcri( ( f\toDs6A198 --(11-)ACK. lc-- 1Z,EaViR0 ' p‘Lo(k)G ` . .u , 4-I.S1..,'' '" ( 15 ' i-la w N ) o . • • 1L 'Fs, - L.. of 4.-6-7N5,DATE: - SIGNATURE OF DIR4 OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE . . REVISION 5/1982 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISIO ' 63007Y beVaA6 EN < APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS .❑ NOT APPROVED 142- 4,--d; ,,- IC‹, o-fraz;a1pa6r,(1Ole 771'1;104-z.sz-re7qe- loBiL,,,. t,iLl - / //yam®®mom .::- 3 . 4,-44 . • ' 'aii4/1 QS , "64 '• A..61,03,2.1 . ) 74 l -40' 01-- '67-1°(--4. frtlatt ie• • ' I : r /C "sr,: ' 4.4r/ T DATE: 9/7e4 SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR : ".2?ZED REPRESENTATIVE I/REVIEWIN DEPARTMENT/DIV ON ; 1$ : " . APPROVED MAPPROVED . WITH CONDITIONS' 0 NOT APPROVED ' ) SVON-pw., tt.it .-J AireW&t' lia/4ifee tA;7'44--eed- ,, 1-v'"'.- ' e:64,4•444,4*...t% , I ) 0 .~r i 3/Z 7/6 • Z., 0.0. 44 -.. ,-, 4 ty,4 T./rage/04 K . . • . • .. .. .. . . DATE: • SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE • REVISION 5/1982 _ - ------ - • Form 182 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION ; - ' (/T/.-/Ty 41vf%/✓.�.E, I ( APPROVED L 4. ROVED WITH CONDITIONS El NOT APPROVED s, AP/4ov _boy re. Poic,S -. Tii*f.'A!SUBJECT TO . ' .L 0T 7 - )641 00s/N.E-sS GE/v7',E'i 4. :LATE `' F AMBIENT-WATER ry Q LACEC AGREEMENT-SEWER Np SYSTEM IItEVELOPMflIT CHARGE-WATER :.. .'- _ •. _^-�: _a CNo SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE-SEWER )/ES p0•04As a X zoo,o7S 0_ $ 5,003 pD Cy6s) SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AREA CHARGE-WATER A'O • o0 • SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AREA CHARGE-SEWER A/ APPROVED WATER PLAN Yee „ , NEeoS 'am Fd- IJ*'2 i i ') Th APPROVED SEWER PLAIT 01( c7L1) l' APPROVED FIRE NYDRAE;. . .A7 iONS I BY FIRE r c'T. �� i FIFE �`....IaISA ? ' (J" - f. lido, .. - ' < DATE: 1/ 7 / / SIGNATUR OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE % REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION ; 7 'jl//=/c. E/ ' ///Y -E/Z/A/ • - PPROVED OAPPROVED WITH CONDITIONS 'El NOT APPROVED w f ,jeve/op men f- sP P fo.-f«ifi m ll e.. Tra Pffe s sir•-a1 co-h.-Nike -eefieoe eit fc) i•Ap c ve 1 n f er cti6,7 Co rfr'/ c 7 F. i4,/�y 44 /. /.C.rrn' ': De vekp 5 he,eid pe r- i1 .tor ✓!fir 7 4•1400o 44 i pr©veMef' c9sses:ay,, en/ . ' /75. aafeArsf '•p der/mn � �e t©��� B�P5Sf�izt` •��// 6e ire p� 5,t e p/av, 5( 6 i / / 9hen are a each►/1'i P.5*le Is ,'r� 's, •C ice/ .Wee,/ 4/'10/ fie,, 5-3V.."..gt Cesletifor- yelvata/ 70142.c)a.s4,47 401, 4, -cr_ferime 4515 rempta,s ; 'Eric. lif - "Ig /7 7 K/75- :- 177t 65:5: - 1\ r.,..1-- - '. C ���>,.. l . _ .DATEi /4-%/ / "�,�4 • SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRt . ATIVE REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVON : � 1 APPROVED IDAPPROVED WITH CONDITIONS -❑ NOT APPROVED //X( • inT00 U aivn • • • ) Lincl AticaN •• i• '.),(21di/Ad16('I DATE; Ill/3� SIGNATURE r OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : oi✓ APPROVED ElIPPROVED . WITH CONDITIONS • ONOT APPROVED litru;: C 01)0 S, S Re9 LC.)q7-E e= --ryl°may ,E• .'yi, E h, IE p r« C. w% l...' W '1 H1 • . N ® No-r To eE �Cos.41.tA) �O o THE •4e/d9. enti 6 xis Nit • • DATE: 77#0,eAd 8,. /gel SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION ; . APPROVED WAPPROVED WITH CONDITIONS •® NOT APPROVED Unless there is additional lighting not shown in the site plan, I see additional - lighting needs for this project. -.• Lighting is needed for the walkway between the two buildings'-for the personal safety of customers and employees ._. Lighting, security glass, and high' security locks are needed at all courtyard entrances. This courtyard will be totally '-Qut of site of any pat ad patrolman; the oint of r passing motorist.. This building•will experience commercial burglary, P entry will be l e .courtyard. � • DATE; I/1 K SA NATURE OF DIRECT+ HORIZFI REPRESENTATIVE. 206N CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST NO.: ECF-039-86 APPLICATION NO(s).: R-040-86 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Application to rezone 0.31 acre from L-1 to B-1 for an existing motel and a proposed restaurant. PROPONENT: Ming-Lei Tsang LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Property located at 219 Sunset Blvd. North. LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton, Building and Zoning Department. The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. There is no comment period for this DNS. Responsible Official: Environmental Review Committee City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055 Phone: 235-2550 APPEAL: You may appeal this determination in writing to Renton Hearing Examiner no later than August 4, 1986. You should be prepared to make specific factual objections. Contact City of Renton. Building and Zoning Department to read or ask about the procedures for SEPA appeals. DATE OF DECISION: July 16. 1986 PUBLICATION DATE: July 21. 1986 //.41'.q. onald G. Nelson Larry M. Springer Building and Zoning Director Policy Development Director • *444111' Yv P Richard C. Houghton Public Works Director x O F 1R4,, A, 4s ° BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT V %® r. • RONALD G. NELSON — DIRECTOR oil 09 co" MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH.98055 • 235-2540 09,41. SEP W#�P BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR August 4, 1986 Trammell Crow 5601 Sixth Avenue South Bellevue, Washington 98108 Re: Site approval application to allow construction of two buildings for office, retail and limited warehouse or industrial uses; file SA-027-86; property located at the southeast corner of Lind Avenue S.W. and S.W. 41st Street. Dear Mr. Crow: The City of Renton. Building and Zoning Department formally accepted the above mentioned application on March 21, 1986. A public hearing before the City of Renton Land Use Hearing Examiner has been scheduled for August 12, 1986. The public hearing commences at 9:00 a.m. in the Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall. The applicant or representative(s) of the applicant is required to be present at the public hearing. A copy of the staff report will be mailed to you before the hearing. If you have any questions, please call the Building and Zoning Department at 235-2550. Sincerely, -?&Ateg-9--71: 16t16-- - Roger J. Blaylock Zoning Administrator RJB:JMM:ss 3027Z.5 cc: MacKenzie/Saito & Associates OF Ri iv A. I, ° • BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT 4i , ® z RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR NIL • am' MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE.SO. RENTON,WASH.98055 • 235-2540 0gTED rre�4°Q SE BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR August 4, 1986 MacKenzie/Saito & Associates c/o Lynn Takeuchi 300 120th Avenue N.E.. Bldg. 3, Suite 233 Bellevue, Washington 98004 Re: Site approval application to allow construction of two buildings for office, retail and limited warehouse or industrial uses; file SA-027-86; property located at the southeast corner of Lind Avenue S.W. and S.W. 41st Street. Dear Sir or Madam: The City of Renton Building and Zoning Department formally accepted the above mentioned application on March 21, 1986. A public hearing before the City of Renton Land Use Hearing Examiner has been scheduled for August 12, 1986. The public hearing commences at 9:00 a.m. in the Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall. The applicant or representative(s) of the applicant is required to be present at the public hearing. A copy of the staff report will be mailed to you before the hearing. If you have any questions, please call the Building and Zoning Department at 235-2550. Sincerely, ..--Viest-C7.3)(4t44-4k. Roger J. Blaylock Zoning Administrator RJB:JMM:ss 3027Z.4 cc: Trammell Crow . 3019Z NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON HEARING EXAMINER RENTON, WASHINGTON A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS ON THE SECOND FLOOR OF CITY HALL, RENTON, WASHINGTON ON AUGUST 12, 1986, AT 9:00 A.M. TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PETITION: TRAMMELL CROW Application for site plan approval to build two buildings fo 58,000 square feet to be used as office, small retail and limited warehouse, or industrial park, file SA-027-86. Property is located on the southeast corner of Lind Avenue S.W. and S.W. 41st Street. Legal descriptions of the files noted above are on file in the Renton Building and Zoning Department. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT THE PUBLIC HEARING ON AUGUST 12, 1986, AT 9:00 A.M. TO EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS. PUBLISHED : August 1, 1986 Ronald G. Nelson Building and Zoning Director CERTIFICATION I, JEANETTE SAMEK-MC KAGUE, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THREE COPIES OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENTS WERE POSTED BY HE IN THREE CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED ABOVE AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW. ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a Notary Public, in and for the State of Washington residing in gtNIIIIDAI , on the (o j H day of 4Ut n s lr , 1986. ' iQ ,14 ( -"aA�S(�1(p _ SIGNED: .` k*CJ' 1 j 4 ., r f., - ., r.^ r ;a:N',y `{ i,q;:,;;Z. 1$ .,F k 1 r(r;x�'+ ' F ,, 'r., '+a `. .' Mi-o. .i<!1��� 1 ;.5 ]r 4 .;ki qi ,,' �1 ,t'tt. fi �.,4,' 4w 4 „. •f'tA�' .i.j a; AV k4 4i r ' 1,.�' \, I tit. r';,9 a, ,I�.. � j 1 '' 9,o �. ii I , ' ^9pF1) SEPI ; , I Cite of Renton La Use He Examiner will hold a ' . 1'`b .x,Ar 5'.. ='! Diu r i ' - ,1 . - i s' I' •'$N 1m` .. •, .rn ;.R t In , , CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS , CITY HALL ' ON AUGUST 12, 1986 BEGINNING AT 9:00 A.M. P.M. c :UPCERNNG: TRAMMELL CROW , SA-027486 , APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO BUILD TWO BUILDINGS OF 58,000 SQUARE, FEET TO BE USED AS OFFICE, SMALL RETAIL AND LIMITED WAREHOUSE OR INDUSTRIAL PARK. I ' '1 + raENERAL LOCATION AND/OR ADDRESS:, . , ON THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LIND AVENUE S.W. AND S.W. 41ST' STREET H ' FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CALL THE. CITY OF RENTON " BUILDING&ZONING DEPARTMENT 235-2550 , : , `_ IS .NOTICE' raTIT . TO BE REMOVE® WITHOUT ' r 4, , . ?RC: AUTHO 'I ATION ' , ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET ' c1 PPLC- 146-oti- REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: 'fiQ 11 F DATE CIRCULATED: d/I As( c9,/, 19 g 4, COMMENTS DUE: ti C1 iJ 3 J 1 R Sla ECF - - APPLICATION NO(s). S - O `&7- $(An PROPONENT: -r-P_4 A4 tit Lei PROJECT TITLE: SO(„9'1 H D S to J is.g.471 BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: L G'-TT-,,C. p ee : Ld e*1C-1 to -r 7e.t A7S LOCATION: s' A= elzAvz soe ex- _Sz ,J 1'/4 ST ,— z_.r"o A- se_j SITE AREA: BUILDING AREA (gross): IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS MINOR MAJOR MORE IMPACT IMPACT INFORMATION 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation G� 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities Li COMMENTS: Our 'information indicates your development trip generation category falls under general office under 100,000 square feet. The trip generation for ' this'category is 17.7 trips per 1 ,000 square feet. Unless you can provide— significant documentation contrary to the established ITE observations from numerous studies, we will use ITE as - our standard criterion. See description of ITE' s general office attached.' CITY OF,RENTCN . hh (C C E f! V Lam• JUN U 51986 BUILDING /ZONING DEPT. , 1 RECOMMENDATION: El DNS nf� MITIGATED DNS n EIS REVIEWED BY: ` 4TO----101+TLE: DATE: ` l 4FORM #14 5,� 4,--r-Q-7- k REVISED 9/10/85 - 710—General Office Building Description:A general office building houses one or more tenants and is the location where the affairs of a business, commercial or industrial organization, professional person or firm are conducted.The building may be limited to one tenant, eithe the owner or lessee, or it cou corrrain a mixture of tenants.inclucling rofes- siorial service`s;a bank or savings-and Joan in- �sdfiution;=insurance`companies, investment b-rakers;-compa y headquarters and services for`the_tenants. The general office buildings surveyed were all located outside the central city business dis- trict and usually in suburban areas. Trip Characteristics: An analysis of correlation be- tween average weekday vehicle trip ends and all measured independent variables was made to determine the best variables to use for pre- dicting vehicle trip ends. These are sum- marized in the table. • Correlation Between Average Weekday Vehicle Trip Ends(AWDVTE) and the Independent Variables for General Office Buildings. Independent Variables Correlation Coefficients (R) All Under 100,000 100,000 to Over G.S.F. 199,999 G.S.F. 200,000 G.S.F.' Employees 0.906 0.865 0.790 — 1,000 Gross Square Feet 0.978 0.667 0.663 0.972 Parking Spaces 0.985 0.915 0.950 0.980 Acres —0.095 0.242 0.809 0.266 *Caution:Few data points in this category Rev.1982 1. SUMMARY OF TRIP GENERATION RATES Land Use/Building Type General Office, Under 100,000 G.S.F. ITE Land Use Code 711 Independent Variable-Trips per von flrnss Square FPPt of Building Area Average Number Average Size of. Trip Maximum Minimum Correlation of Independent Rate Rate Rate Coefficient Studies Variable/Study Average Weekday Vehicle Trip,Ends 17 7 28 8 8 - 8 20 50.2 Peak A.M. Enter 1.45 1. 90 1.28 3 2 4. 3 Hour Between Exit 0 . 25 0. 80 0 .15 3 24 . 3 of 7 and 9 Total 2 .50 3. 79 1.40 15 41..9 Adjacent P.M. Enter 0. 19 0.70 0. 06 3 24 . 3 . Street Between Exit 1 . 14 2 . 60 0.74 3 24 . 3 Traffic 4 and 6 Total 2 82 6. 39 0 80 17 45. 7 Peak A.M. Enter 2 . 23 3.31 1.29 5 47. o Hour Exit 0. 45 1 .04 n . 16 5 47.0 (\ of Total 2 .9 2 5-9 8 1 _4 4 17 4 9 .6 Generator P.M. Enter 0 . 36 0- 70 0 14 5 47 0 Exit 1 88 3 19 0 42 5 47 - 0 Total 2.84 6. 39 1 . 1 2 18 51 . 4 Saturday Vehicle Trip Ends 2 . 4 14.7 0.6 10 42 . 6 Peak Enter Hour of Exit Generator Total 0 118 0 77 0-2 0 5 . 58 4 Sunday Vehicle Trip Ends 1 2 7 . 3 0 . 2 10 42. 6 Peak Enter Hour of Exit Generator Total 0 .18 0. 37 0 . 06 5 58. 4 Source Numbers 5, 21, 54, 72 , 88, 89, 92, 98, 100 • ITE Technical Committee 6A-6-Trip Generation Rates Date: 1982 i G.S.F. = Gross Square Feet of Building Area ;ram 130—Industrial Park Description:Industrial parks are areas containing a Since parking spaces are usually determined number of industrial or related facilities.They on the basis of the building size, it is recom- are characterized by a mix of manufacturing, mended that parking not be used as a predic- service and warehouse facilities with a wide tive variable for calculating trip ends. variation in the proportion of each type of use On the average, industrial parks generate 3.6 from one location to another.Many industrial weekday vehicle trip ends per employee. See parks contain highly diversified facilities— the following tables for daily and peak hour some with a large number of small businesses trip generation rates. and others with one or two dominant indus- tries. Industrial park trips usually peak at the same The number of employees in industrial parks time as the adjacent street traffic (7 to 9 A.M. surveyed fanged from 88 to 5,3.00 with an aver- ageand 4 to 6 P.M.), as indicated in the table. oft7_42j Gross square feet of floor area per Data Limitations: Caution should be exercised employee averaged 510, or about two em- when using average trip generation rates ployees per 1,000 gross square feet of building found for industrial parks. The data showed area, and 18 employees per acre of developed wide inconsistencies(average weekday vehicle land. Size of the industrial parks surveyed trip ends ranged from 1.4 to 8.8 per employee), ranged from 1.6 to 115 acres with an average of believed to be due to differences in the mix of approximately 40 acres. activities from one park to another. Trip Characteristics: An analysis of correlation be- It is recommended that traffic generation of tween average weekday vehicle trip ends and industrial parks be forecast using rates for all measurable variables was made to deter- each type and amount of activity, i.e., man- mine the best variable for use in predicting ve- ufacturing,office,warehouse,light industrial, hide trip ends. From the data assembled to etc.The combined result of these calculations date, number of employees has been found to should give a more realistic rate than the aver- . have the highest correlation with average age indicated herein.It is not believed that ad- weekday vehicle trip ends.Gross square feet of ditional data sources will improve validity of floor area and total area occupied by the indus- an average rate for all industrial parks. trial park showed less correlation with average weekday trip ends, as shown in the table. • Equations and Correlation Between Average Weekday Vehicle Trip Ends(AWDVTE) and the Independent Variables for Industrial Parks. Equations and Independent Variables Correlation Coefficient (R) AWDVTE = 278.2 + 3.45 x Number of Employees 0.827 = 1103.1 + 4.178 x Thousands of Gross Square Feet 0.528 = 1712.0 + 24.45 x Number of Acres 0.376 Parking Spaces • 0.799 Rev.1982 ( Y ,. SUMMARY OF TRIP GENERATION RATES Land Use/Building Type Industrial Park ITE Land Use Code 130 Independent Variable-Trips per 1,000 ('Zrnss SrpiarP FePt 8t»lding Area Average Number Average Size of Trip Maximum Minimum Correlation of Independent Rate Rate Rate Coefficient Studies Variable/Study Average Weekday Vehicle Trip Ends 7, 00 37. 0 0. 9 47 380 Peak A.M. Enter 0. 54 2.26 0. 29 7 629 Hour Between Exit 0. 16 0. 23 0. 09 9 898 of 7 and 9 Total 0. 93 2 .28 0 . 91 18 4 6 3 Adjacent P.M. Enter 0. 19 0.22 0. 18 ' 4 1202 Street Between Exit 0. 59 0.6 4 0. 9R 4 1202 Traffic 4 and 6 Total 0 . 99 2 . 85 0. 90 18 521 Peak A.M. Enter 0.59 2 . 26 0.29 8 556 Hour Exit 0 . 10 0.21 0 . 07 4 1122 • 1 of Total 0. 83 2 . 28 , 0. 12 29 443 Generator P.M. Enter 0. 28 2 . 70 0.14 9 527 • Exit 0. 47 0. 64 0. 08 3 1399 Total n. 89 .2 . 95 0- 13 29 444 Saturday Vehicle Trip Ends 2 . 73 4 3.n n n_ 1 R 10 453 Peak Enter 0. 13 3.2n n_ n0 10 453 Hour of Exit 0. 18 0 .22 n . n1 3 .1089 Generator Total 0. 35 0- 0 n_ 32 _ 2 1274 _ Sunday Vehicle Trip Ends n_ hh 2 . 49 . 0 07 10 453 Peak Enter n_ n 3 0_ 32 n 02 8 440 Hour of Exit 0 02 n. n3 n,_ n1 3 1089 Generator Total 0_07 0. 28 0. 05 . 2 1 274 Source Numbers 7, in, 14, 68, 74, 85, 91, 10a • ITE Technical Committee 6A-6-Trip Generation Rates Date: 1975, 1979, Rev. 1982 b• a MACKENZIE/SAl i 0 & ASSOCIATES, P.S. • 'k ARCHITECTS-PLANNERS I 300 120TH AVENUE NORTHEAST•BUILDING 3,SUITE 233 F-0 CITY ( G RENTON9 I BELLEVUE,WASHINGTON 98005•(206)451-1005 �� t9' ��...a MI AY 2 7 1986 _<< May 27, 1986 EP T. City of Renton Environmental Review Committee c/o Roger Blaylock 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 Dear Roger: RE: Trammell Crow Company File Number SA-027-86, Located on the Southeast Corner of the Intersection of Southwest 41st Street and Lind Avenue Southwest (Trammell Crow Project Title "South Lind Square") Project Number 385611 The subject project has been analyzed by the Environmental Review Committee (E.R.C. ) with their findings illustrated in a memorandum dated May 12, 1986. We have reviewed the four conditions presented by the E.R.C. and request reconsideration of Items 1 and 2 for the following reasons: la. We do not understand or agree with the use of 14.3 vehicle trips per 1,000 sq. ft. of office use. A similar number was used to identify vehicle trips for the recently approved build-to-suit projects for Boeing, constructed by Sabee and BetaWest. We would contend that our "office" use would be a much less intense type of office use. As an example, our parking space to building sq. ft. ratio is much 'less than that proposed for the Boeing projects (Trammell Crow - 4 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of building; Boeing - 6 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of building). We, therefore, believe that the 14.3 vehicle trip number should be adjusted downward substantially. lb. We have analyzed the actual use/occupant load for the most recent Trammell Crow business parks similar to the proposed South Lind project. For the Springbrook Business Park located at 43rd Street, just southwest of this proposed project, there are 3 buildings of similar use with 117,365 sq. ft. (total site area 10 acres). There are a total of 232 employees, which is a ratio of 1.98 employees per 1,000 sq. ft. of building. Another Trammell Crow project located in Redmond, Washington, Redmond Heights Tech Center Phase I, has approximately 52,000 sq. ft. of building leased (of a total of 78,000 sq. ft. , site area 5.46 acres) with 66 employees for a ratio of 1.27 employees per 1,000 sq. ft. of building. We believe that the anticipated tenants for this project will in fact have an employee to sq. ft. ratio similar to the Trammell Crow Redmond Heights and Springbrook projects. We have reviewed the I.T.E. manual and believe that the intended uses and characteristics most resemble the description of industrial park (copy attached). We, therefore, believe as a minimum, no greater than 7 trips per 1,000 sq. ft. of building area should be used versus the 14.3 outlined in the May 12th memorandum. 2. We recognize that the CH2M Hill is in the final stages of issuing a study outlining area-wide traffic circulation and improvements needs; however, until this information is available and the costs quantified, we believe it is unfair to o • ,. . „. _ City of Renton Environmental Review Committee Project Number 385611 May 27, 1986 Page 2 . condition that our project agree to improvement participation based on a $270.00 per vehicle trip number. It is our understanding that developments in the past 9 months in this area of Renton in some cases have been conditioned based on $00.00 per vehicle trip and $175.00 per vehicle trip. We thank you in advance for your time and consideration. We have expressed to Roger Blaylock our desire to explain our position directly to the E.R.C. at their next regularly scheduled meeting which is May 28, 1986 at 10:00 A.M. Please call if you have any questions or concerns. Sincerely, 04621411;;" Lyn Takeuchi Ar hitect/Resident Principal LT:mo enclosure • CPI O RENTON [ Jllhi MAY 2 7 1986 ,." t:;,•,.. .. . , ... ... • . � � • 130—Industrial Park Description:Industrial parks are areas containing di Since parking spaces are usually determined number of industrial or related facilities.They .;, on the basis of the building size, it is recom- are characterized by a mix of manufacturing, mended that parking not be used as a predic- service and warehouse facilities with a wide tive variable for calculating trip ends. variation in the proportion of each type of use On the average, industrial parks generate 3.6 from one location to another)Many industrial weekday vehicle trip ends per employee. See parks contain highly diversified facilities— the following tables for daily and peak hour some with a large number of small businesses trip generation rates. and others with one or two dominant indus- tries. Industrial park trips usually peak at the same The number of employees in industrial parks time as the adjacent street traffic (7 to 9 A.M. and 4 to 6 P.M.), as indicated in the table. surveyed ranged from 88 to 5,300 with an aver- age of 747. Gross square feet of floor area per Data Limitations: Caution should be exercised .employee averaged 510, or about two em- when using average trip generation rates ployees per 1,000 gross square feet of building- A;, found for industrial parks. The data showed area, and 18 employees per acre of developed wide inconsistencies(average weekday vehicle land. Size of the industrial parks surveyed trip ends ranged from 1.4 to 8.8 per employee), ranged from 1.6 to 115 acres with an average of believed to be due to differences in the mix of approximately 40 acres. activities from one park to another. Trip Characteristics: An analysis of correlation be- It is recommended that traffic generation of tween average weekday vehicle trip ends and industrial parks be forecast using rates for all measurable variables was made to deter- each type and amount of activity, i.e., man- mine the best variable for use in predicting ve- ufacturing,office,warehouse,light industrial, hicle trip ends. From the data assembled to etc. The combined result of these calculations date, number of employees has been found to should give a more realistic rate than the aver- have the highest correlation with average age indicated herein.It is not believed that ad- weekday vehicle trip ends.Gross square feet of ditional data sources will improve validity of floor area and total area occupied by the indus- an average rate for all industrial parks. trial park showed less correlation with average weekday trip ends, as shown in the table. Equations and Correlation Between Average Weekday Vehicle Trip Ends(AWDVTE) and the Independent Variables for Industrial Parks. Equations and Independent Variables Correlation Coefficient (R) AWDVTE = 278.2 + 3.45 x Number of Employees 0.827 = 1103.1 + 4.178 x Thousands of Gross Square Feet 0.528 1712.0 + 24.45 x Number of Acres CITY OF TON ,, 0.376 Parking Spaces Flrg4 C [ `PJ t 0.799 MAY 2 7 1986 Rev.1982 v r 0 • SUMMARY OF TRIP GENERATION RATES Land Use/Building Type Industrial Park ITE Land Use Code 130 Independent Variable-Trips per 1,000 Gross Srpia_rP Feet Rui l li ng Area Average Number Average Size of Trip Maximum Minimum Correlation of Independent Rate Rate Rate Coefficient Studies Variable/Study Average Weekday Vehicle Trip Ends -2-7:1,9k 37. 0 0. 9 47 380 Peak A.M. Enter Th. 54 2. 26 0. 29 7 629 Hour Between Exit 0. 16 0. 23 0. 09 9 898 of 7 and 9 Total 0. 93 2. 28 0. 31 18 463 Adjacent P.M. Enter 0. 19 0 . 22 0. 13 4 120? Street Between Exit 0. 59 0. 64 0. 33 4 1202 Traffic 4 and 6 Total 0. 99 2 . 85 0. 30 18 521 _ Peak A.M. Enter 0. 59 2 . 26 0. 29 8 996 Hour Exit 0. 10 0. 21 , 0. 07 4 1122 ^ of Total 0. 8R 2 . 28 0. 12 29 443 „. Generator P.M. Enter 0. 28 2. 70 0 14 _ 9 527 Exit o. 47 0 . 64 , 0.08 3 1399 Total 0. 89 2. 95 _ 0_ 13 29 44k Saturday Vehicle Trip Ends 2. 73 43_ n0 n. 18 10 453 Peak Enter 0. 13 3. 2 n n_ 0 R JO 453 Hour of Exit 0. 18 0.22 n 01 3 1 n89 Generator Total 0 35 0, 60 0. 32 1774 Sunday Vehicle Trip Ends 0 66 2 49 n n7 10 453 Peak Enter n 0 3 n 32 0 n 2 8 4 4 o Hour of Exit 0.n2 0. 03 n.._nl 3 .1089 Generator Total 11 n n ?R 05 1 7 4 Source Numbers 7, 1 0, 14 , 68, 74 , •5, 91 , 100 ITE Technical Committee 6A-6-Trip Generation Rates Date: 1975, 1_97Q,, Rev. 1 q82 CUITY O1 'RENTON , (:."...:.: 1, --) -11Dili il,_; ii \iiri • 0 • <,... L_a P�M AY 2 7 1986 �.__ i ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHttr' cb L) PPLC /l c b'ifv REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: ?pL.II CAI( 1)6 de€sO pie Air DATE CIRCULATED: //I Ay acl 1 g ( COMMENTS DUE: u ,cJ E l lc'Re. ECF - - CITY OF RENTON APPLICATION NO(s).. S - 0 2.7- $<,o MAY 29 1986 PROPONENT: Te4 M M(e�. POLICY f " LOPMEN I PROJECT TITLE: S O i i-I BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: L Cs -r Q 1eEno iI/S LOCATION: C CO 0 A' $T Z., wo A-ti re,/ SITE AREA: BUILDING AREA (gross): IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS MINOR MAJOR MORE IMPACT IMPACT INFORMATION 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) ' Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation + 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: rfr1A-k ‘Ngg RECOMMENDATION: El DNS 0 MITIGATED DNS El EIS REVIEWED BY: TITLE: DATE: FORM #14 REVISED 9/10/85 OF R&I .$ . , - BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR i rLl .5) co" MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE.SO. RENTON,WASH.98055 • 235-2540 o94T0 SEP� M�(P BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR • July 29, 1986 Richard L. Romney, Partner Trammell Crow Company 5601 Sixth Avenue S P.O.BOx 80326 Seattle, Wa. 98108 SUBJECT: TRAMMEL CROW COMPANY Dear Mr. Romney: The Environmental Review Committee considered your letter of July 28, 1986 in which you requested that Trammell Crow be allowed to present additional specific traffic data at the time of actual tenant improvement and occupancy to the Environmental Review Committee to determine the final figures on traffic mitigation. The Committee accepts this approach, but reserves the right to consider the validity of the information. It may not utilize the information in final calculations; however, Trammell Crow would still have the opportunity to appeal the, environmental decision at that point. For The Environmental Review Committee Roger J. Blaylock Zoning Administrator RJB:plp TrammellCrov`-�lompany � 5601 Sixth Avenue South P.O. Box 80326 Seattle, Washington 98108 206/762-4750 July 28, 1986 Environmental Review Committee City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 Subject: Trammell Crow Company File No. SA-027-86 Located at the southeast corner of the intersection of Southwest 41st Street and Lind Avenue Southwest Dear Sirs: We hereby accept the ERC conditions to the Hearing Examiner specified in the June 18th, 1986 memorandum with the understanding that the cost per vehicle trip has been decreased from $270.00 to $188.00. By the way of clarification, however, Trammell Crow Company would ask to be allowed to present actual traffic data generated by existing tenants in lieu of using the ITE average figures if it appears that the two figures differ substantially. Sincerely, TR;� �0 L 0 Richard L. Romney Partner RLR:lo CITY OENTON �llv . JUL 2 81986 1.] BUILDING /ZONING DEPT. :",!,;'s'a)' „,i,1„ 4,. 'i,.. ,1 +'`,s::._.aii. :,t„i:e,l,,.^.i y,t.' ,•,i, ", , I, ,#, i, ,,t,. A.;; `.;1' t,� "i ;ti? or ,j.'':: •i, C!!.' •, :•1' t,:1 F., pp,4,'., il• ,4, 1. — t 1 its it I�t ! .. L ' .. • .: ./(� • �'�� ;;� (/ - Ili' ,t, %1'' ':#%,`,;';';', 'Ik i' •'{:, ,.. ,, A• , .x , 'S. 7 'Nv'• •'" it p 5' i`w,p4A-U •y�s I , i M1_ ♦ ( ,"3 fit. :K I . + ( y x 7 !( , �T ,v 7� N Mfi (I.A.� C '1 4,4.'(.'�1° 1'S I' { -A.. •°ter • C3 •,t x W L. f �, 't, (4 he ,.S u tt FS,:4 ,r ', ,7'• 1 i� v ' '1 s r x r ;!, ,� ",w I• I� !A c= ,thy..aL �., � t"t r � �.�. • '•.t,CJ p �: t' E ,} to h- I u .. t i• ®® rv�::: ,.f '�`!. • vi .•'t V "; '( ''ilia, ti tilt."t'' ?' t• r L� r I I (.� 'rati !A%a. 4,, ,1, i ( I y.,,Y a.h mitt t 4,t{ I �,9R ,0a tiry r' .k t '(.. ® ; .fti, t ' •'rrs,', , F, i a iv 1+ 4 q' `. ' r ', yt1. i j O i r f,•s „ . (+yid }',a 8 ,F.4. i 1, t y t',fd tt rs . M; S 1 j ��a f q�t 3 t ti i V tF y iy 9q : f0' N.3, t `it• �, } t 4*N. :' d; ctS' .'y4 4'4•4 •U.3�r dh4r..,(`„.'iie.,. ,rf.w,.A''` O , ,kQ d', :',I(.11 q7 SEPtti`� 'I. • I,•i. ' I , City . or . Rentdn . Land 1se Hearing Exa liner h,`Y .,.m ..t .i'yM1. cry ,t Y" r;N f r , i.; , .,.,S '.,i �i ' ( f :• t , t „d+,; x r S }�• • 1 X` �i, ,4 , j yu� �S ,�i 6,,-,. t ,,. :,, w `! E.r,>t1 9,. r' ,v,•w r�, .1 •� ,'4#�'( try, 3�,;111,,. i r'ra, .not'�L ,y "r, 5+ . � ti-'y ,�, ; ' •� W y .+,�}''` i., t ,ar Y•f�v4 3 n ' ! Y.4';. . 7'a ';�c ,^i, v? 4 5,, i•+ L'' 9'4 i 1 ' rp �''rf�M1 'J .iY r 4k t, i,�Sv'" i r 3 •,r 1. r 1 i �1 ' k{. '"k t '{u ,;! ,, , p' �r ^5 } " • # '�x •t; E°. ,'k•'l a3t' 1 ,; ��k b s� 10(7,. �' ,4' . �,�` ,..1 �..t f-?/1• � t '( ,...%s it. . v# 'LS I ...a( t�,t u;,a#p .n' yyr �;•e t,ya� '( '�r� {,"�c r z y t ix tf Y� �4r,: 4e bS S m, . ti: # t +t t q'' a ,f ?E 4 1 c: `- y ' ``pi>. • � ' i 4'q , X� t�• • `' .d >n, (�F S(g{ , ','S' w f J S ,i r . i` .� !. s M 4 ? � . , ri . (r t 7,,' t'w^'T$, Y,d1. ' 3^',' L+, ',,W, b t .. Y�''t ," r• Y { 49 �'y g id • 'S Y'9, ti 3E ��. i • 4. t a sk 9,,y,,, q'� +r 7^,"� >Mk y7 u� ,c f"* SK � ,.E l'I .'i 3 •� 'tl' .4 S 1. 9',, , fin.'• ± 4 f �` j i M k , tf!Ps 4 d k Mgt•y '}"kgi 1, V. i u M1 � ) ctiI F \ 1 t ' 's c ' 1 1 tt: '(y 4� r f �4,: a s�1 d; st'nit4i`"; • x hL"}ti.r r- v,�f b ,r' %as'� 3:,, k?t��•• p,1 M `� 1y '�}�+ ,h ,e, i, ,. !:. i fin 't, .i..:. "1 'l, ,• Gll'•' �.lE',. V waF in• CITY COUNCIL CHJ&NI :ERS , CITY HALL ON JULY115:. 1986 BEGINNING AT 9:00 A.M. — P®Mo A d"t lie,, .y p� 'i,'+ t ��f [y f !t:x 4 . 'r �'� . . ,. ' -'� �� ` ' �r TR�'11ELL CROW FILE MD-065-86 "---1 ur,t (Tb: 'pt v «a+,r« .t , W f r . " yF ice , 9ti fr �: 5• ' E - . -4 E ,, Fr A ,L, f; l' 0 ".' • L / h v. , a ,may" r; t P. a'r , it 9' ry . T EV te } A. . N' S4..FILM . ''' :' El lb41'; ;'.111:o T ',". LA F':' / 14 .': :: 1111)1 t.,',?'' i:::.:0A 1 1''''L , * f .f. ::: t s .. , .L '. fa !�"`. 7 a: y •«. t,`� K tf ,.ku„�, wn:tIE` !. } I TY, n+uy,_ k'�`i h. .c i i c'yn,r. IF, ,a r k 4 t"a t ;,' „ ,• ",, 'n "` r . A # rIII . ;� r sw,a ae ! 19..,,, 4 ,1 A , 1 A i`C -, :,• .r yy 44 s APPEAL BY TRA'IELL CROW CO. OF 2 CONDITIONS OF. AN ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION BY ENV I ROMEN TAL I. REVIEW COf lITTEE, r {�7 •� .� I �` rY��.,� .:�y''. 6�m p�gg L q�# ki, rn ,As ■ I n`�L.fi'' !��k +t�r. r�� 4 t�• 1`�.. ,�1 .i t u SOUTHEAST CORNER OF S.W. L1ST STREET AND LIND AVENUE S.W. • LEGAL DESC IPTGO OM FILE ON THE RENTO t=UH-D NG & Z;y�NO G DEPART 1, ENT. •• , ' 3Y.4. S li 5 wisti!4 fii: . i t,A. r'i t� ( ,,t f�7'F ?'- �e 1�'�{ t1` i�d g ,wa';A»+ .PN y'EA,, , s., , 1 ti € t. ". u l 41. t? .�,i 5..'I bk r. w ,ram.. 1 tf t. . ,+ , x:s , I. x t EZ ED ■ '` 1 I'• .1 NA . p IT •' "'�(}#,4p � - I OFF. '° wr ` .a ' M . I P'®R FURTHER INF ii.Pa;',, /ATV N C•.' LL THE CITY' OP '.mitE 9TO A B... IL rI: N ',Z JNili iEPAIT T e3 aes : r�. , "ICE, "` !!e ( , .-')) „ ,,E. 1 ' IT t � �('�T�t ,:I R emu/ J, 1 �'UT y., (r �J- yam`,tay. 'drae: 4J y U E7; H 'et I- t �3 ....' FORM 115 • POSTED: 6/20/86 • 1 E h' y r ' E < i LA .RATISN I • APPLICATION NO. .SA;027-86, ECF-023-86 ' 1 %PROPOSED ACTI,ON _ APPLICATION/;TOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL. TO BUILD TWO BUILDINGS HAVING 58 , 000 SQUARE FEET, TO BE USED FOR GENERAL OFFICE, SMALL RETAIL AND LIMITED WAREHOUSE,..FILE SA-027-86: \GENERAL LOCATION AND OR ADDRESS PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST INTERSECTION OF LIND AVENUE S.W. AND S.W. 41st STREET. POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE CE.R.C.) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION ❑!DOES ®DOES NOT HAVE ASIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE , ENVIRONMENT. AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT ❑WILL 1WILL NOT BE REQUIRED. THE CITY OF RENTON WILL NOT ACT ON THIS PROPOSAL FOR 15 DAYS FROM THE OAT BELOW. COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVEO BY AN APPEAL OF THE ABOVE DETERMINATION MAY BE FILED WITH THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER BY E:DO R M., JULY 2 , 1986 • - FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT THE CITY OF RENT{DI! LDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT 235—EE50 DC aQT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WRY !' PROPER AUTHORIZATION , , ' OF R.& o THE CITY OF RENTON to Z . I y POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ® 235-2552 O MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE.SO. RENTON,WASH.98055 9,0 <0. 09gT�D SEP�,140' •BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MEMORANDUM MAYOR DATE: June 18, 1986 TO: Fred J. Kaufman, Hearing Examiner FROM: Environmental Review Committee SUBJECT: TRAMMELL CROW COMPANY FILE NO. SA-027-86 LOCATED ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF S.W. 4Tst STREET AND LIND AVENUE S.W. The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has analyzed the new information that was submitted on June 10, 1986 by MacKenzie/Saito and Associates representing the Trammell Crow Company for the construction of a one-story 58,090 square foot building. The Environmental Review Committee finds that the facts suggest that their original decision of May 12, 1986 should be revised based upon the following facts: 1. The ERC recognizes that the ultimate users of the proposed speculative buildings and the associated traffic impacts are unknown. However. the Environmental Review Committee is charged with assuring that mitigating measures are imposed at the initial time of development and, therefore. they must require bonding of the potential maximum development of the site. 2. Even though the ERC accepts the applicant's statement that the most likely ultimate development scenario would be 75 percent office, 15 percent assembly, and 10 percent warehouse with an estimated 687 daily vehicle trips for the project, they must assume the worst case to require appropriate bonding. • . ERG Conditions/to Hearing examiner Trammel Crow Company/SA-027-86 June 18, 1986 Page 2 3. The City of Renton must identify area-wide traffic circulation improvement needs to provide continued public accessibility to individual privately owned properties. Without this formal identification by the City, the general level of service will continue to decline as a result of the incremental adverse impacts resulting from each private development. 4. The previous traffic evaluation conducted by the City late in 1984 was based upon land use assumptions of a greater percentage of warehouse use and a lower intensity of office park uses. Actual and potential development in either office or industrial park and retail uses for the subject site generate significantly more traffic than originally anticipated. As a result, a revised traffic study is necessary to reflect the change in environmental circumstances. 5. The City has hired a traffic engineering consultant, CH2M Hill, who will identify the area-wide traffic circulation improvement needs along with a prioritization of those needs for the Valley Industrial Area. The initial study has been presented to the administration of the City of Renton. General review by the City Council and public will occur during the month of July 1986. 6. If the project is developed into primarily offices (as proposed by the developer), over 200 additional employees would occupy the buildings. The applicant has shown by other comparisons to "industrial parks" that the total employment would be approximately 120 people. This still represents a significant increase for the demand for on-site recreation and an incremental demand in the need to provide year-round off-site recreation. The applicant has proposed providing plazas adjacent to the main structures for passive recreation. Some off-site recreation should also be provided. Other developments in the Valley (Orillia Properties and Valley Office Park-Phase 2) have typically been providing funds in the amount of $70 to $80 per 1,000 square feet of building area for the completion of the Valley Master Park Plan. In both of the other cases the users were strictly office with high employee level. Therefore, the ERC believes that the assessment should be reduced to approximately $60 per 1,000 square feet. 7. This proposal appears to be the first phase of a total development of approximatey 115,000 to 120,000 square feet of building area. Therefore, the total anticipated development for both phases of the Trammell Crow project could represent an introduction of as many as 500 employees or as few as 240 employees into the area with a total range of 800 to 1,660+ average daily vehicle trips. • • .ERC'Conditions/to Hearing examiner Trammel Crow Company/SA-027-86 June 18, 1986 Page 3 8. The Public Works Department has specifically identified an immediate need to upgrade an existing traffic controller at the intersection of S.W. 41st Street and East Valley Road. This facility is critical to the continued traffic accessibility of the subject site at any stage of development since the primary access to the site will be from SR-167 and Lind Avenue S.W. Therefore, the Environmental Review Committee (ERC), under their substantive authority [Section 4-2822(D)], recommends to the decision maker, the Hearing Examiner, that the application for a site plan approval to allow the construction of a one-story 58,090 square foot building located on the southeast corner of S.W. 41st Street and Lind Avenue S.W. is subject to the following conditions: 1. Participation in area-wide traffic improvements identified by the pending CH2M Hill study to the project's proportionate share based upon estimated daily traffic generated as calculated by the standards established in the Institute of Traffic Engineers Trip Generation Manual(Third Edition-1984). The maximum cost per vehicle trip shall not exceed $270 per trip. The final cost per vehicle trip may be reduced as determined by the CH2M Hill study or as determined by the City Council. 2. The payment of traffic mitigation fees for the speculative building shall be divided in the following way: a. At the time of building permit application for the building shell, Trammell Crow will pay the amount of $10,000 in cash to pay for the traffic signal controller modification at the intersection of East Valley Road and S.W. 41st Street. b. A bond shall be submitted at the time of building permit application for the building shell in the amount of $112,050 minus the $10,000 cash per condition #2a above. [This is estimating 100 percent of the estimated cost of development of a "pure office park". This is based on 14.3 vehicle trips times 58 times $270. The 14.3 vehicle trips per 1,000 square feet was utilized instead of the 17.7 vehicle trips because the utlimate project will be in excess of 100,000 square feet.] The bond may be adjusted by the Building Official based upon the final cost per vehicle trip as determined by the CH2M Hill study or as determined by the City Council. The bond shall have an expiration date of five years. However, the intent is that all off-site mitigation will be completed no later than January 1, 1988. • . SRC'Conditions/to Hearing -r:aminer Trammel Crow Company/SA-027-86 June 18, 1986 Page 4 c. The applicant shall establish a database tracking system for the individual tenant improvements in the project. The tenant improvements shall be determined at the time of building permit application based upon the following 1984 Third Edition Institute of Traffic Engineers criteria: Warehouse 5.01 vehicle trips for every 1,000 sq. ft. Office space 14.3 vehicle trips per 1.000 sq. ft. Manufacturing/ 3.99 vehicle trips per 1,000 sq. ft. Assembly Area Industrial Park 7.0 vehicle trips per 1,000 sq. ft. d. Prior to the issuance of an occupancy permit for any individual tenant, the applicant, tenant, owner or assignee shall replace the underlying bond with a cash deposit to the Finance Department or the traffic improvements must be installed. 3. Since the Environmental Review Committee is waiting upon additional information to prioritize the necessary traffic improvements in the entire Green River Valley Planning Area as determined by this CH2M Hill study (covered by bond as outlined in condition 2 above), they cannot prioritize at this time the specific improvements the developer can accomplish in lieu of actual cash payment of fees. The Environmental Review Committee will provide by September 1, 1986 the developer with a prioritization of needed traffic improvements and a construction schedule. 4. The applicant shall provide funds in the amount of $3,500 at the time of building permit application for the shell of the buildings to complete the master recreation plan for the Green River Valley in lieu of providing actual off-site public recreation. The funds shall be deposited into a special account to be utilized by the Parks and Recreation Department for preparation of the appropriate recreation master plan. Therefore, the above conditions are necessary as a minimum for the preservation of the welfare and safety of the general public and a minimum to mitigate the adverse environmental impacts of the proposal. Under Section 4-2822(D). the decision maker must accept these conditions as binding upon his ultimate decision unless he identifies in writing a substantial error in fact or conclusion by the Environmental Review Committee. The decision maker then has the option of asking the ERC for reconsideration or revising conditions. • ERC Conditions/to Hearing-Examiner Trammel Crow Company/SA-027-86 June 18, 1986 Page 5 The applicant also has the ability to request reconsideration of these conditions from the ERC or appeal these conditions directly to the Hearing Examiner under authority granted • in Section 4-2823(A)(1)(a) within 14 days of the date that the DNS is final. Therefore, the appeal date would be Wednesday. July 2, 1986 at 5 p.m. Appeals must be submitted in the form prescribed by both the Environmental Ordinance of the City of Renton and the Hearing Examiner Ordinance, Section 4-3011(B). RJB:ss 1170N cc: Lynn Takeuchi MacKenzie/Saito & Associates 300 120th Avenue N.E., Bldg. 3, Suite 233 Bellevue, Washington 98004 Rick Romney Trammell Crow Company 5601 Sixth Avenue South Seattle, Washington 98108 „ / MEMORANDUM11 DATE: June 16, 1986 TO: Ron Nelson, Building & Zoning Dept. FROM: Gary Norris, Traffic Engineering SUBJECT: Trip Generation Rate/Trammell Crow ECF-023-86 SA-027-86 Please be advised that for assessment purposes this office concurs with the trip generation rate of 14.3 trips per 1 ,000 square feet of building space. The total estimated trips would be as follows: 2 buildings at 58,000 square feet each 2 x 58,000 = 116,000 sq. ft. of building area 116,000 = 14.3 = 1 ,658 trip ends 1 ,000 )71A-4') CEM:ad CITY OF RENTON RECEDVEll JUN 16 1986 BUILDING /ZONING DEPT. 1168N NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON. WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a declaration of non-significance for the following projects with additional conditions imposed as mitigating measures under their authority of Section 4-2822(D) of the Renton Municipal Code: TRAMMELL CROW (ECF-023-86) Application for site plan approval to build two buildings having 58.000 square feet to be used for general office, small retail and limited warehouse, file SA-027-86. Property located at the southeast intersection of Lind Avenue S.W. and S.W. 41st Street. Further information regarding this action is available in the Building and Zoning Department. Municipal Building, Renton, Washington, 235-2550. Any appeal of ERC action must be filed with the Renton Hearing Examiner by July 2, 1986. Published: June 18, 1986 CITY OF RENTON „. MACKENZIE/SAITO & ASSOCIATES, P.S. `'� �"� PUP 1 ARCHITECTS-PLANNERS 1 300 120TH AVENUE NORTHEAST•BUILDING 3,SUITE 233 JUN 0 1986 BELLEVUE,WASHINGTON 98005•(206)451-1005 BUILDING/ZONING DEPT. June 10, 1986 ; CITY OF RENTON fj \4,17 • . JUN 9 1986 City of Renton Attention: Gary Norris, Traffic Engineering Department E'_rll_r ,,,,.,;, , a 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 Dear Gary: RE: Trammell Crow Company, File No. SA-027-86 S.E. Corner of the Intersection of S.W. 41st Street and Lind Ave. S.W., Renton, Washington Project Number 385611 With reference to captioned project, in our discussions on June 4, 1986 at the Environmental Review Committee Meeting, we have completed our collection of data to establish the average daily trips for the two similar projects to that which we anticipate constructing at 41st and Lind Avenue. Enclosures "A" and "B" are summaries of our findings for the two sites. The additional enclosures are project brochures and actual field worksheets for the respective sites. The trip data was collected by independent contractors, not currently or previously employed by Mackenzie/Saito & Associates or the Trammell Crow Company. Without going into a lengthy discussion, we believe this additional information further supports our position outlined in our May 27, 1986 letter. We, therefore, restate and request that you indicate to the Environmental Review Committee at their June 11, 1986 meeting that we have substantiated to your satisfaction' our position of using the industrial park 7-trip per thousand sq. ft. average daily trip figure for our proposed development versus the 12.3 to 17.7 figure. We thank you in advance for your time and consideration. Please call if you have any questions or comments. Sincerely, Lynn/Takeuchi Architect, Resident Principal LT:mo enclosures e Enclosure "A" REDMOND HEIGHTS TECH CENTER Vehicle Trip Count - Summary/Analysis Date: June 6, 1986 Duration: 7:00 A.M. to 6:00 P.M. Total Occupied Building Square Footage: 52,000 sq. ft. Total Trips Counted: , 317 Trips Total Trips Using I.T.E. Industrial Zone Classification Average Trip Rate 7(Trips) Times 52 = 364 Trips. Cf1Y OF REN ON " r1 WIF • [1, JUN 10 1986 ' ,..-; -QU'IL DING/Z ING DEPT. 6/9/86 Enclosure "B" SPRINGBROOK BUSINESS PARK Vehicle Trip Count - Summary/Analysis Date: June 6, 1986 Duration: 7:00 A.M. to 6:00 P.M. Total Occupied Building Square Footage: 186,000 sq. ft. Industrial Park Use: 118,000 sq. ft. Warehouse: 68,000 sq. ft. Total Trips Counted: 1,190 Trips Total Trips Using I.T.E. Industrial Zone & Warehouse Classifications Average Trip Rate 7(Trips) Times 118 = 826 4.88(Trips) Times 68= 332 1,158 Trips 1,158 Trips 6/9/86 . CITY OF RpikliON WiPti JUN101986 ;_ -.`' Q Rare F - ti 41g Fr DA-si TALLY SHEET `` f5`p • TIME NUMBER OF VEHICLES SUBTOTAL 7:00-7: 15 Ail i 7: 15-7:30 I 7:30-7:45 1111 4 7:45-8:00 III 3 8:00-8: 15 -I-r 8: 15-8:30 II 8:30-8:45 III 3. 8:45-9:00 IIII 9:00-9: 15 ( 1 z, 9: 15-9:30 II z 9:30-9:45 tit ' 4 9:45-10:00 t • 10:00-10:15 III 3 10: 15-10:30 10:30-10:45 I , Z 10:45-11:00 11 t - 11:00-11:15 tit 3 11:15-11:30 a-I-i'r 1 (� 11:30-11:45 4..10 1 co 11:45-12:00 yt-j' 11 (( 9 • 12:00-12:15 144-1 (1 1 - 12: 15-12:30 ,1411 10 • 12:30-12:45 t'itI 9 • 12:45-1:00 1111 ,4 1:00-1:15 1 tI 1 1: 15-1:30 1 I z 1:30-1:45 1111 1:45-2:00 G 0 2:00-2: 15 14.4-r I I ► _ 8 2:15-2:30 III ' 2:30-2:45 It 2 2:45-3:00 3:00-3: 15 it Z 3: 15-3:30 1 3:30-3:45 II Z 3:45-4:00 I 4:00-4: 15 .I-I-ri 4:15-4:30 -i 11 7 4:30-4:45 4.1- [ 4:45-5:00 Hu 5:00-5: 15 j 4-$-1 f I 1 8 5: 15-5:30 I I I 5:30-5:45 1.-1-4� 1 t -1 5:45-6:00 III .3 ttll, : 5 VEHICLES TOTAL I-l Z CITY OF RiN O!NS r- ?' MACKENZIE/SAITO & ASSOCIATES, P.S. UU JUN 101986 lilar 300 120th AVENUE N.E.BUILDING 3 SUITE 233 BELLEVUE,WASHINGTON 98005(206)451-1005• • FR:t DAZ r a • . ' TALLY SHEET TIME NUMBER OF VEHICLES SUBTOTAL v., 7: 15-7:30 / 7:30-7:45 // / / / S 7:45-8:00 8:00-8: 15 /7 / ' 75 8715-8:30 (tp / I / 8:30-8:45 ilt :3 8:45-9:00 /// 3 9:00-9: 15 I I ( S3 n 9: 15-9:30 1111 q- Le .---- 9:30-9:45 It / 3,„ ', 9:45-16:06 _ 101 10:00-10: 15 1-1-fik/ C 10: 15-10:30 / 10:30-10:45 / - 10:45-11:00 i // 7S 11:00-11:15 / / -2- -Z- 11:15-11:30 ( 1 11:30-11:45 Jill CI_ 11:45-12:00 t 1200-1215 ill 5 4,)12: 15-12:30 114,1 6, 12:30-12:45 ili1,1 6 12:45-1:00 i 1 1:00-1:15 bi44, 5 1: 15-1:30 lip 1:30-1:45 11\A . • 4 1:45-2:00 ILA 3 2:00-2: 15 2:15-2:30 A_ 2 1 5 Or) ,//2:30-2:45 I. 2:45-3:00 I‘ 1,7 3:00-3: 15 3: 15-3:30 AAA ,, 3:30-3:45 IA g_... 3:45-4:00_ )111 4 . 4:00-4: 15 ( 1. 4: 15-4:30 611 ) 4:30-4:45 ) V\ 4 4:45-5:00 till 4 5:00-5: 15 flu 4 5: 15-5:30 . o 5:30-5:45 I. 5:45-6:00 MN 8 _ 5 VEHICLES TOTAL 14,6- CITY(3!-. RtmON FO: N I°, Fill WI 1'4 10 JUN 1 0 1986 ---J--- -- MACKENZIE/SAITO & ASSOCIATES, P.S. I 300 120th AVENUE N.E.BUILDING 3 SUITE 233 BELLEVUE,WASHINGTON 98005(206)451-1005 • d. • • • TALLY SHEET g wi-G.1 FAQ-«,C.,/C. -A ,r s`r-(+ TIME NEWER P VEHICLES • c:, • (ti, II:" SUBTOTAL 7:19-7: 15 Jyril 'I 7: 15-7:30 - 7:30-7:45 .irf.1 i U $ 7:45-8:00 4ff1 wlva 111. 8:00-8:15 mil- lit i I II 8: 15-8:30 lit,- 6- 8:30-8:45 . 11 tr l i I 1 -4 8:45-9:00 ys.t p.-,t II\ • f'' 9:00-9: 15 ,1 1 J.i- 1 I.1 f 1 1 !`,- 9: 15-9:30 ! jii 'i 9:30-9:45 t 11 ( ( , 9:45-10:00 1- 1 ; !' r t f 1 •11:11-11: 15 — 10: *10:30 1 1, .1- I1 r' ! }' in 15 10:30-10:45 _ , 5.-- 10:45-11:00 -j- '1 L{-- '[: .::': 11:0 0-11:15 i-IA1 y-\t7 ; , t "' 11:15-1.1:30 .-1-�' ). ili . \\ i 11:30-11:45 •\ UV,1, ill ✓ 1. 11:45-12:00 ,1.4r, II iH ( 9 12:11-12:15 1.11t1.11 `. I ,., j -1,- 12:15-12:31 1411. - �-, 12:31-12:45 'WI- K b-1H f 1 \( 12:45y1:/1 I j :1s 1:90.=1,i5 kfuirt j t,I 16:7 3,4 . 1:15z1:30 741.11 Int .\ 1:30-1:4A, i , ± 2 't._j. 2:00-2:15 lig I ! •2?15-2:3.1, �� "z. - s' w 2:1-50-2:45 rii.L I if 2:45-3:00 1 ,f-- 3:00-3: 15 T1-1--4, li 4 I O 3:15-3:30 1'}1 4J~ 3_30-3:45 1 (\ I - 3:45_4:00 �- f '11I lQ 4:00-4,15 1- 4 1-1i ,- il j 1 1 4: 15-4:30 ti - t i-44 1 0 4:30-4:45 !-t .1 5" 4:45-5:00 ItH \ 1 ) 5:00-5: 15 �- T+IA 1144--�1"1- -- --- l 5: 15-5:30 )_;• V1,1, ` 24 5:30-5:45 _I 11 7 5:45-6:11 lilt It `tM. : I VEHISLIS TOTAL 1 0,7 CITY OF REN ON . D E3 rO, rfrj- II \t'll 13 If ,,` ' - t. MACKENZIE/SAITO & ASSOCIATES, J UN �- 01986' ,- ' 33112•th AVENUE N.E.I IILPINS 3 EE1TE 23$ .• _ UELLEVIE,WASHINSTSN MU(2MG)451-1615 4-1,- :::-.f'',„:. i ' : .-, 1::;:.II'r-:"•••••(,.. T., \,,r,-`73.z.-:-COW-CP....45e.sf) 41111 nrALI- • .. :..e '..i . , • ' TALLY SHEET VIM NIMBER Or VEHICLES SUBTOTAL :., 7:00-7: 15 •! 1, 11 .. 11:1,:k) i 7: 15-7:36 1-ft‘...:-Iir,. Hi 7:36-7:45 1-1•11, 1.11, t_ In \:\\-Vi..1\li. I . 7:45-8:09 • 1-1!'' 4111-1`A\ mckY4 2:16-9: 15 .11 ft --' il1-k-1.11t,..IA -\\111A•\...\ ! 8:15-8:39 ''',1.1\1.•'.ii-`,-.\\,1 1-11; ' ''-. . .e... -- -j- ;'Li.' '-' ' 1 i'. . , • ' 1 '1,9:39-9:45 1 ;11‘..-\,•,\X1.. Y..,\..k, 8:45-9:99 !LII t17' 1-‘'‘, 1 ', • ,. • )•L , _;.. .',::1, l:. 9:09-9:15 9: 15-9:36 '411 ', 11\ ,0 ‘ .., :i , ill 1:36-9:45 -••,- ' \\ 9:45-19:99 t',"\\i. A-A,\\...11•1[ 1111- • 16:96-19: 15 ±1_,... ._____- lel: 15710:3ii `i,iIA 1-1- . 111 \\k 11 10:36-19:45 -RIA---iti..\-k,... 11 1 , I II_ 16:45-11:99 Aii:‘,..\. 11:90-11: 15 14-)..A...1ii1- 111: 11:15-11:39 '-,\A\,.-AV,--\.\.`\ AI 1\ 4, /1 . . 1139-11:45 11,: i. T4\114. 11111 • icl . 11:45-12:00 NI '11.11 -1-flA -).141.-.1.41.v. 1\ 7.7 12:00-12: 15 \MI tl-j1.._, lil.„1.-.. ill 12:15-12:30 111-L-1-141,1-4 I liC::, 12:30-12:45 '11.11, 111,.[..:1-q\ 't1-11, 'UR, L 2 to 12:45-1 $0$0 till, 1-A\ATI111----•:•11•Al 11\\\ 2 L-1 1:6e-1: 15 414:11LU 2_1 1:.15-1:311 1-:‘,,\\ -.AVVA-\\A.'WA,A\\ 2 3 .._. 1 . • • 2:19-2: 15 ..1% _11_ __ \-za it 2:15-2:39 ______------- • • 2:30-2:45 'kit( 1\1 1 IR 2:45-3:99 3:90-3: 15- IiiiHriA_MIY ,LA 29 3:15-3:311 %1AAIUI____ WC 3:30-3:45IAXi..\ A\ -- .4--- -\ . 3\ 3:45-4:90 -\.\..\.k.--\-- :I\ ., . .. 2 1 4:46-4: 15 -Ai.kt.8.\\..vv,t\\\ 11 4: 15-4:36 -.1--WV., \-\\...,,i 'M 20 4:30-4:45 't\41-ki.1,11-4 • IC" 4:45-5:69 5:96-5: 15 \ rl .• 5: 15-5:39 5:39-5:45 .N.1-\..\,\ \A, I 5 5:45-6:119 Nifii,A\ . N 1 2_ _ -,,, lttl. : 5 VEHICLES '''' 0 TOTAL 1 COTY 0 .53,--)N 41,1 'D _ FP, rei ill. fl VI {., to t , II JUN 1. 0 1986 --i - - 1- MACKENZIE/SAITO & ASSOCIATES, P.§. 300 120th AVENUE N.E.BUILDING 3 SUITE 233 .,.. —,„ . ,: _ BELLEVUE,WASHINGTON 98005(206)451-1005 • Inc- t <, OF RA,r Qo s." ;• THE CITY OF ' ENTON •,.,, 0, MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENDOill,WASH. 98055 o SCUM BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR 0 LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER -51 cos P FRED J. KAUFMAN. 235-2593 D SEP1' June 8, 1986 Cr T'Y Q7 t EN C: N VLi r[ 'JUL 81986 Richard L. Romney TRAMMELL CROW COMPANY BUILDING/ZONING DEPT. P. O. Box 80326 Seattle, Washington, 98108 Re: Administrative Appeal Hearing Dear Mr. Romney: Due to unexpected circumstances, the appeal hearing previously set for July 15, 1986 has had to be rescheduled. The new hearing date has been scheduled for July 22, 1986 at 9:00 A.M. in the Council Chambers, Renton Municipal Building located at 200 Mill Avenue South. This letter will confirm my secretary's conversation with you on July 7. 1986 wherein you confirmed you and/or 'your attorney will be available for the rescheduled hearing date of July 22nd. `4, If there are any questions, please contact this Office. Sincerely, FRED J. KAUFMAN HEARING EXAMINER FJK/dk • cc: Lawrence Warren, City Attorney Larry Springer, Director. Policy Development Bob Bergstrom, Engineering Supervisor Ronald Nelson, Director. Building & Zoning %/Roger Blaylock, Zoning Administrator II . OF R4, 0 +.?{ , }S,, } fir, T t..'"Y# , 09gTDSEP1°4°- City of Renton Land Use Hearing Examiner will hold a r il r rrv ' e wr A'' ` 4• t K , ,At h .:,° � _ �.9 �N iF m � .`! Sri,+ %'t° 44 '.; H t r. M"5r .i r 4 e '{ b sP 0, , , r ti j ! . '1/4t 4,.. , ,. . . i. p ;4„::: ,, ,. . a , 4 . A ' •v " • 3 � +xi 9 i" Fk 2 7 y in . CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS , CITY HALL • ON JUNE 3, 1986 BEGINNING AT 9:00 A.M. P.M. CD C E R d " TRAITIELL CROW APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO BUILD TWO 'BUILDINGS OF 58,000 SQUARE FEET TO BE USED S OFFICE, SMALL RETAIL AND LIMITED WAREHOUSE, FILE SA-027-86 - • • GENERAL LOCATION AND/OR ADDRESS: PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LIND AVENUE S .W. & S .W. 41ST STREET. • , FOR FURTHER INFRATION CALL THEE CITY OF RENTON BUILDING& ZONINGOM DEPARTMNT 235-25.50 IS NOTICE NOT , TO BE REMOVED WITHOUT sAft MACKENZIE/SAITO & ASSOCIATES, P.S. ARCHITECTS-PLANNERS 300 120TH AVENUE NORTHEAST•BUILDING 3,SUITE 233 CITY OF RENT•14 BELLEVUE,WASHINGTON 98005•(206)451-1005 ® L. 01 n: 11.0r3. C1 [ MAY 2 71986 May 27, 1986 BUILDING,TC,NING DEPT. City of Renton Environmental Review Committee c/o Roger Blaylock 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 Dear Roger: RE: Trammell. Crow Company File Number SA-027-86, Located on the Southeast Corner of the Intersection of Southwest 41st Street and Lind Avenue 'Southwest (Trammell Crow Project Title "South Lind Square") Project Number 385611 - The,subject project has been analyzed by the Environmental Review Committee (E.R.C. ) with their findings illustrated in a memorandum dated May 12, 1986. We have reviewed the four conditions presented by the E.R.C. and request reconsideration of Items 1 and 2 for the following reasons: la. We do not understand or agree with the use of 14.3 vehicle trips per; 1,000 sq. ft. of office use. A similar number was used to identify vehicle trips for the recently approved build-to-suit projects for Boeing, constructed by Sabee and BetaWest. We would contend that our "office" use would be a much less intense type of office use. As an example, our parking space to building sq. ft. ratio' is much less than that proposed for the Boeing projects (Trammell Crow - 4 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft.. of building; Boeing - 6 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of building). We, therefore, believe that the 14.3 vehicle trip number should be adjusted downward substantially. lb. We have analyzed the actual use/occupant load for the most recent Trammell Crow business parks similar to the proposed South Lind project. For the Springbrook Business Park located at 43rd Street, just southwest of this proposed project, there are 3 buildings of similar use with 117,365 sq. ft. (total site area 10 acres). There are a total of 232 employees, which is a ratio of 1.98 employees . per 1,000 sq. ft. of building. Another Trammell Crow project located in Redmond, Washington, Redmond Heights Tech Center Phase I, has approximately 52,000 sq. ft. of building leased (of a total of 78,000 sq. ft., site area 5.46 acres) with 66 employees for a ratio of 1.27 employees per 1,000 sq. ft. of building. We believe" that the anticipated tenants for this project will in fact have an employee to sq. ft. ratio similar to the Trammell Crow Redmond Heights and Springbrook projects. We have reviewed the I.T.E. manual and believe that the intended uses and characteristics most resemble the description of industrial park (copy attached). We, therefore, believe as a minimum, no greater than 7 trips per 1,000 sq. ft. of building area should be used versus the 14.3 outlined in the May 12th memorandum. 2. We recognize that the CH2M Hill is in the final stages of issuing a study outlining area-wide traffic circulation, and improvements needs; however, until this information is available and the costs quantified, we believe it is unfair to City of Renton Environmental Review Committee Project Number 385611 May 27, 1986 Page 2 condition that our project agree to improvement participation based on a $270.00 per vehicle trip number. It is our understanding that developments in the past 9 months in this area of Renton in some cases have been conditioned based on $00.00 per vehicle trip and $175.00 per vehicle trip. We thank you in advance for your time and consideration. We have expressed to Roger Blaylock our desire to explain our position directly to the E.R.C. at their next regularly scheduled meeting which is May 28, 1986 at 10:00 A.M. Please call if you have any questions or concerns. Sincerely, —4444c/L'i Lyn Takeuchi Ar hitect/Resident Principal LT:mo enclosure C TY OF RFNTON . D : 0 rt _ �' MAY 2 7 1986 4. • 130—Industrial Park Description:Industrial parks are areas containing a Since parking spaces are usually determined number of industrial or related facilities.They on the basis of the building size, it is recom- are characterized by a mix of manufacturing, mended that parking not be used as a predic- service and warehouse facilities with a wide tive variable for calculating trip ends. variation in the proportion of each type of use On the average, industrial parks generate 3.6 from one location to another.Many industrial weekday vehicle trip ends per employee. See parks contain highly diversified facilities— the following tables for daily and peak hour some with a large number of small businesses trip generation rates. and others with one or two dominant indus- tries. Industrial park trips usually peak at the same time as the adjacent street traffic (7 to 9 A.M. The number of employees in industrial parks and 4 to 6 P.M.), as indicated in the table. surveyed ranged from 88 to 5,300 with an aver- age of 747. Gross square feet of floor area per Data Limitations: Caution should be exercised employee averaged 510, or about two em- when using average trip generation rates ployees per 1,000 gross square feet of building found for industrial parks. The data showed area, and 18 employees per acre of developed wide inconsistencies(average weekday vehicle land. Size of the industrial parks surveyed trip ends ranged from 1.4 to 8.8 per employee), ranged from 1.6 to 115 acres with an average of believed to be due to differences in the mix of approximately 40 acres. activities from one park to another. Trip Characteristics: An analysis of correlation be- It is recommended that traffic generation of tween average weekday vehicle trip ends and industrial parks be forecast using rates for all measurable variables was made to deter- each type and amount of activity, i.e., man- mine the best variable for use in predicting ve- ufacturing,office,warehouse,light industrial, hicle trip ends. From the data assembled to etc. The combined result of these calculations date, number of employees has been found to should give a more realistic rate than the aver- have the highest correlation with average age indicated herein.It is not believed that ad- weekday vehicle trip ends.Gross square feet of ditional data sources will improve validity of floor area and total area occupied by the indus- an average rate for all industrial parks. trial park showed less correlation with average weekday trip ends, as shown in the table. • Equations and Correlation Between Average Weekday Vehicle Trip Ends(AWDVTE) and the Independent Variables for Industrial Parks. Equations and Independent Variables Correlation Coefficient (R) AWDVTE = 278.2 + 3.45 x Number of Employees 0.827 = 1103.1 + 4.178 x Thousands of Gross Square Feet 0.528 = 1712.0 + 24.45 x Number of Acres CITY OF RENTON 0.376 0.799 ir E!. 11 D Parking Spaces � h9 AY 2 r 1986 Rev.1982 • SUMMARY OF TRIP GENERATION RATES Land Use/Building Type Industrial Park ITE Land Use Code 130 Independent Variable-Trips per 1,000 Gross Square FPP1 Hui lding Area Average Number Average Size of Trip Maximum Minimum Correlation of Independent Rate Rate Rate Coefficient Studies Variable/Study Average Weekday Vehicle Trip Ends ' 7, nn) 37 . 0 0. 9 47 380 Peak A.M. Enter 0. 54 2 . 26 0. 29 7 625 Hour Between Exit 0 . 16 , 0 . 23 0 . 09 5 898 of 7 and 9 Total 0. 93 2 . 28 0 . 31 18 463 Adjacent P.M. Enter 0. 19 0 . 22 0 . 13 1 4 .1202 Street Between Exit 0 . 59 0 . 64 0. 33 4 1202 y Traffic 4 and 6 Total 0 . 99 2 . 85 0. 30 _ _ 18 521 Peak A.M. Enter 0 .59 2 . 26 0. 29 8 _ 556 a Hour Exit 0 . 10 0 . 21 0 . 07 1 4 1122 of Total 0 . 8 3 2 . 28 0 . 12 29 114 3 - Generator P.M. Enter 0 . 28 2 . 70 0. 14 9 527 Exit 0 . 47 0 . 64 0. 08 , 3 1399 Total 0. 89 2. 95 0. 13 29 444 Saturday Vehicle Trip Ends 2 . 73 43 00 n_ R 10 u53 Peak Enter 0. 13 3. 2n 0 0$ 10 1.153 . Hour of Exit 0. 18 0. 22 0 0m 3 i nR9 Generator Total 0 "5 n 6 0 0 . 32 _ _ 2 .12.7 4 Sunday Vehicle Trip Ends n_ 66 2 49 0 07 10 1153 Peak Enter n 0 3 0 32 n n 2 8 ti Li O Hour of Exit 0 02 n- 03 0. 0, 3 1089 Generator Total I az n :A n n 2 1 2 Source Numbers 7 , 10, 14 , 68, 74 , R5, 91 , 10n ITE Technical Committee 6A-6-Trip Generation Rates Date: 1975 , 1 9Zq, Rev. 198? o s 4 TON . `'� �..�si �`:i F. VI S FP :: D n I, E1 __1MAY 2 7 1986 -., f n r D LC, {. II ,� 1I - MACKENZIE/SAITO & A OCIATES, P.S. I� Ili.) 300 120TH AVENUE NORTHEAST•BUILDING 3, SUITE 233 MAY 2 9 1986 BELLEVUE,WASHINGTON 98005•(206) 451-1005 RECORD OF TELEPHONE CONVERSATION BUILDING/ZONING DEPT Trammell Crow Renton (South Lind Square) 385611 JOB JOB NO. May 23, 1986 8:30 A.M. DATE TIME INCOMING CALL Roger Blaylock PERSON OUTGOING CALL City of Renton Planning Department COMPANY PHONE NO. South Lind Square SUBJECT: The following items were discussed: REMARKS 1. The deadline for submitting requests for reconsideration is 5 P.M. , May 27, 1986. 2. Roger will place our project on the agenda for the May 28, 1986 Environmental Review Committee meeting. 3. The most optimistic schedule would be that the E.R.C. would develop new conditions at the May 28, 1986 meeting. Then a report would be prepared and by Monday, June 2, 1986, the project is republished. The 2-week appeal period would end June 16, 1986, and a public hearing would be held on June 17, 1986. 4. Roger would strongly recommend that we have data to support our request such as evaluation of other comparable projects. 5. Roger will be out of the office the first 2 weeks in July. 6.. If at the May 28, 1986 E.R.C. meeting, no change is made to the conditions outlined in the May 12, 1986 memorandum, this project would continue to go forward' to the June 3rd public hearing. LT:mo cc: Roger Blaylock (City of Renton) L a euchi Rick Romney (Trammell Crew) ' I RENT UILDING & ZONING DEPAFVENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 023 - 1986 APPLICATION NO(S) : SITE PLAN APPROVAL 027-86 PROPONENT : MACKENZIE/SAITO & ASSOCIATES--- TRAMMELL CROW PROJECT TITLE : TRAMMELL CROW SITE APPROVAL BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO BUILD '2 BUILDINGS OF 58,000 SQUARE FEET FOR GENERAL OFFICE BUSINESS, SMALL RETAIL Lb'lABLthHM N CS, AND L1M1rJ u TIAiarhUUJF. FACILITIES LOCATION : SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LIND AVENUE AND SW 41st STREET TO: 0 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : APRIL 9 OENGINEERING DIVISION EITRAFFIC ENG . DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : OUTILITIES ENG . DIVISION 0 FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU n PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT n .BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT OPOLICE DEPARTMENT POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT OOTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P.M, ON . REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : `Rt-7-) 4 KAPPROVED El APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS 0 NOT APPROVED y 6_—.. C-. D SI URE OF DIRECTORZ OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE ATE: �.���� REVISION 5/1982 Fnrm 182 ` - . IRENTcBUILDING & ZONING DEPAIOAENT DEVELOPMENT ii APPLiC 4 MN 9 ■EVE °a, SHEET . ECF - 023 - . 1986 APPLICATION NO(S) : SITE PLAN APPROVAL 027-86 PROPONENT ; MACKENZIE/SAITO & 'ASSOCIATES--- TRAMMELL CROW PROJECT TITLE : TRAMMELL CROW SITE APPROVAL BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO BUILD 2 BUILDINGS OF 58,000 SQUARE FEET FOR GENERAL OFFICE BUSINESS, SMALL RETAIL L5lAt5L1HHMHN'l5, AND L1M1lui wAR1fluubL JACILIflES LOCATION : SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LIND AVENUE AND SW 41st STREET TO : C PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : APRIL 9 EjENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG . DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION 0 FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT n POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT l IOTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P .M. ON , REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : ZC)Wil3 Cr. n APPROVED I ( APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED A -rWtn Y (z' ) ( 1 CK I g:CCSIUIRcce p,L,o( `_ ..u0 , 4-1 5-r (Ito fib 1 j SHaw r.a ) a Z DATE: 4N5-C�� - SIGNATURE OF DIRECT OR AUTHORIED REPRESENTATIVE IL REVISION 5/1982 RENTCOBUILDING & ZONING DEPASV1ENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET • .CiTY OF RENTON ECF - o23 _ 1986 MAR 2 `! 1986 APPLICATION NO(S) : SITE PLAN APPROVAL 027-86 Polk? nr:VPI pMF!T n=P T PROPONENT : MACKENZIE/SAITO & ASSOCIATES--- TRAMMELL CROW PROJECT TITLE : TRAMMELL CROW SITE APPROVAL BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO BUILD 2 BUILDINGS OF 58,000 SQUARE FEET FOR GENERAL OFFICE BUSINESS, SMALL RETAIL E51AbL1SHP1r;1Q'rs, AND Ltrilri u wAKLn0Jbi rAGILITIES LOCATION : SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LIND AVENUE AND, SW 41st STREET TO : PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : APRIL 9 OENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : F-1 UTILITIES ENG . DIVISION 0 FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU OPARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT n BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT l ] OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 :00 P ,M. ON REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISIO 63C/CY b6(16 )4/11EN I ( APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS [1 NOT APPROVED s &(l 44:71„,4,1 4.ys ;4 ( DATE: r/eC SIG�� REPRESENTATIVE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED RE RESENTATI E l REVISION 5/1082 RENT•BUILDING & ZONING DEPACOVIENT DEVELOPMENT APPUUCATEON •‘EVGEW SHEET ECF — 023 — 1986 APPLICATION NO(S) : SITE PLAN APPROVAL 027-86 PROPONENT : MACKENZIE/SAITO & ASSOCIATES--- TRAMMELL CROW PROJECT TITLE : TRAMMELL CROW SITE APPROVAL BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO BUILD 2 BUILDINGS OF 58,000 SQUARE FEET FOR GENERAL OFFICE BUSINESS, SMALL RETAIL ES IA13LISHMtNrS, AND LLMiltD VAKEhOUSE rACILIIIES LOCATION : SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LIND AVENUE AND SW 41st STREET TO : PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : APRIL 9 DENGINEERING DIVISION jTRAFFIC ENG . DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : OUTILITIES ENG , DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU I ( PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT OBUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT FlOTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 :00 P ,M, ON REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISIONa idy- APPROVED MAPPROVED WITH CONDITIONS I ( NOT APPROVED , dee,4443„varrt-- 1 - {p/►•.••"• L 7/re c Apatoont DATE: SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 . RENTO0BUILDING & ZONING DEP4 ENT DEVELIP;`E T A P,6)LJCATDO1 • EVE 41' SHEET ECF - 023 - 1986 APPLICATION NO(S) : SITE PLAN APPROVAL 027-86 PROPONENT : MACKENZIE/SAITO & ASSOCIATES--- TRAMMELL CROW PROJECT TITLE ; TRAMMELL CROW SITE APPROVAL BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT : APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO BUILD 2 BUILDINGS OF 58,000 SQUARE FEET FOR GENERAL OFFICE BUSINESS, SMALL RETAIL h5lABL15HMLNlb, AND LLM1lt;U WAKE t10USE rAUILITIES LOCATION : SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LIND AVENUE AND SW 41st STREET • TO : n PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : APRIL 9 DENGINEERING DIVISION FlTRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : n UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION Li FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU E. PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT 0 BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT 1-1 POLICE DEPARTMENT n POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT I 1OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P .M. ON REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : (/T/4-iTx 41V6 'N',E ,e n APPROVED (; ROVED WITH CONDITIONS Ei NOT APPROVED 51E- A Wit01/.V-L c y 5t;G re. Dons N.SUBJECT TO l .z oT 7 - o i..c 15(.Ls//v ess ( NT,5. LATE. .. AMBIENT-WATER A/Q LATE CMS MEMENT-SEWER A JO SYSTEM ELOPMENT CHARGE-WATER 'W - .-- -- -.. -- ="-, :- CN o SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE-SEWER y, 5 oD.a¢/5a x ZOOS D 7s[i= $ S,Oo3.°° U6s) SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AREA CHARGE-WATER A/p o0 SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AREA CHARGE-SEWER ND APPROVED WATER PLAN YE-5_� _ NEG S ipL,PAI Fa-- w')411 cvc4Zc ) APPROVED SEWER PLAIT WOK � APPROVED FIRE HYDRAEao ,.<:AO€OHS BY FIRE T. y l r FIDE I e�..7 AtJA SI5 ? �. rir- 0 ii DATE; 4/ 7 /k, SIGNATUR OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1082 / Y - RENT( ' BU LDING & ZONING DEPAI IRENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 023 - 1986 APPLICATION NO(S) ; SITE PLAN APPROVAL 027-86 PROPONENT ; MACKENZIE/SAITO & ASSOCIATES--- TRAMMELL CROW PROJECT TITLE : TRAMMELL CROW SITE APPROVAL BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO BUILD 2 BUILDINGS OF 58,000 SQUARE FEET FOR GENERAL OFFICE BUSINESS, SMALL RETAIL h51Al3LiSH1"1LN'1'S, AiNu LINIThIJ W1AKL'fUUb1' NALIL11IE5 LOCATION ; SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LIND AVENUE AND SW 41st STREET TO : El PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE ; APRIL 9 ENGINEERING DIVISION El TRAFFIC ENG . DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE ; Ei UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU Ei PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT n POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT F-1 OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P ,M, ON REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION ; T;,P,4F-/G �l���Lel �'o W,PROVED n APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS [1 NOT APPROVED 1ve/oprne..e tt 5IL�JQ /' t lC,/p P4e- Treffiee eitV8©eArrie af`f-cs ,.per ve in je).ect/0/7 C9I,y rc/ c271 !tea/4 4/ 4091/5"liefetot. J`7e Vekp - 6/Ta Jd p D-/? ,/f''' eir" l�1 p ?yd01 �+ls, tole/ e5Sh R't a.)/// /Se olerr iaee, eF¢Ate, nyw useg:e c "me r y; a ,�'�, �ti .e5F'ficr, // 40301 tee), °DL/ ,!‘ct - cos*Ai- ye0414,9 #-4eAvas,rt as# A'cj41•4 . 51 /©6o s ' _ �' .�'8 /77 /75" v/ 79�,6 7 0,40 vx' DATE: SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTH IZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 RENTC `BUILDING & ZONING DEPAIIfl ENT • - DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 023 - 1986 APPLICATION NO(S) : SITE PLAN APPROVAL 027-86 PROPONENT : MACKENZIE/SAITO & ASSOCIATES--- TRAMMELL CROW PROJECT TITLE : TRAMMELL CROW SITE APPROVAL BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO BUILD 2 BUILDINGS OF 58,000 SQUARE FEET FOR GENERAL OFFICE BUSINESS, SMALL RETAIL Lb 1ABLLSHMbN1S, AND L1M1"11 U WAKEdiUUba rALILITIES LOCATION : SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LIND AVENUE AND SW 41st STREET 7 TO : n PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : APRIL 9 DENGINEERING DIVISION flTRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : n UTILITIES ENG . DIVISION 0 FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU EIPARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT n POLICE DEPARTMENT n POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT FlOTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING . PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P .M. ON 9AQ0' REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : /15< APPROVED [' APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED f;4ff014 Got Luun orlCf a Cd Atie DATE:?,( 0# 445: 1-1//3 S� SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 RENTC `BUILDING & ZONING DEPAI . IIENT DEVELOPMENT Ads' UUCATAON REVIEW SHEET ECF - 023 - 1986 APPLICATION NO(S) : SITE PLAN APPROVAL 027-86 PROPONENT : MACKENZIE/SAITO & ASSOCIATES--- TRAMMELL CROW PROJECT TITLE : TRAMMELL CROW SITE APPROVAL BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO BUILD 2 BUILDINGS OF 58,000 SQUARE FEET FOR GENERAL OFFICE BUSINESS, SMALL RETAIL Ea'1ABLibH1"1J N1S, ANL LiYI11J 1J wAKr,r10u5E rACILITIES LOCATION : SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LIND AVENUE AND SW 41st STREET TO : El PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : APRIL 9 El ENGINEERING DIVISION flTRAFFIC ENG, DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : El UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU n PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT n POLICE DEPARTMENT POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT in OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 :00 P .M. ON , REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : �e*- EI APPROVED [APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS n NOT APPROVED #j„,,z "Fc_ ,e 59 ui,),E tM E N i s RAJA y/2E. . Eu)j S' PrN,LC C. pkx 'D '-+l) ;-3-44-k Z. N o.. 'v - 7; 8E c.Coset i %c ' /e 774E a14, &/Gale ONs/;4 r�r I )G�rct`tfs - DATE : mlch/ afl, /Age SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 J l , RENTC; ,BUILDING & ZONING DEPAI SENT DEVELOP-, 1E=NT PPUUC T1 • ,4 I' EV EW SHEET ECF - 023 - 1986 APPLICATION NO(S) : SITE PLAN APPROVAL 027-86 PROPONENT : MACKENZIE/SAITO & ASSOCIATES--- TRAMMELL CROW PROJECT TITLE : TRAMMELL CROW SITE APPROVAL BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO BUILD 2 BUILDINGS OF 58,000 SQUARE FEET FOR GENERAL OFFICE BUSINESS, SMALL RETAIL ES'IABL1sHMr;N15, AND LrM1-1Lll WAKi i-iOUSE rACIL111ES LOCATION : SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LIND AVENUE AND SW 41st STREET TO : Li PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : APRIL 9 ENGINEERING DIVISION F-1 TRAFFIC ENG, DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : n UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION n FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU n PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT n BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT n POLICE DEPARTMENT 1-1 POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 11OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P .M, ON REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : ". "-k1.4c n APPROVED M APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS ONOT APPROVED G7 DATE: «C JJJ SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 MEMORANDUM To ROGER RLAYLOCK, PLANNING DRPARTMF.NT Date 4/1 /86 From BROOKE OWEN, CRIME PREVENTION Subject ADDITIONAL COMMENTS - TRAMMELL CROW SITE APPROVAL Unless there is additional lighting not shown in the site plan, I see additional lighting needs for this project. Lighting is needed for the walkway between the two buildings for the personal safety of customers and employees Lighting, security glass, and high security locks are needed at all courtyard entrances. This courtyard will be_ totally _out of site of any patrolman, or passing motorist. This building will experience commercial burglary, and,the point of entry will be the courtyard. - p 1r, f 1122N CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST NO.: ECF-023-86 APPLICATION NO(s).: SA-027-86 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Application for site plan approval to build two buildings of 58.000 square feet to be used as office. small retail and limited warehouse. PROPONENT: Trammell Crow LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Property located on the southeast corner of Lind Avenue S.W. and S.W. 41st Street. LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton. Building and Zoning Department. The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. Additional conditions were imposed as mitigating measures by the Environmental Review Committee under their authority of Section 4-2822(D) Renton Municipal Code. Responsible Official: Environmental Review Committee City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055 Phone: 235-2550 APPEAL: You may appeal this determination in writing to Renton Hearing Examiner no later than May 26. 1986. You should be prepared to make specific factual objections. Contact City of Renton. Building and Zoning Department to read or ask about the procedures for SEPA appeals. DATE OF DECISION: May 7. 1986 PUBLICATION DATE: May 12. 1986 ArAolik,,( ,d;t42( A titr 444 Ronald G. Nelson arry M. S• •f_er • Building and Zoning Director Policy Day= ment a =ctor Ri and C. ghton Public Works Director OF R�� If ' :.. ° BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR ; 0 '° OaP2 MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 • 235-2540 0,9g7.�O SEPTE4‘��P BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR MEMORANDUM • DATE: May 12. 1986 TO: Fred J. Kaufman, Hearing Examiner FROM: Environmental Review Committee SUBJECT: TRAMMELL CROW COMPANY FILE NO. SA-027-86 LOCATED ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF S.W. 41st STREET AND LIND AVENUE S.W. The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has analyzed the information submitted by MacKensie/Saito and Associates representing the Trammell Crow Company for the construction of a one-story 58,090 square foot building. The Environmental Review Committee finds the following facts to be true of the proposed project. 1. The ERC recognizes that the ultimate users of the proposed development are unknown. Therefore, the building is speculative in nature and the actual traffic impacts associated with the development are unknown. Precise calculation of funds necessary to mitigate off-site traffic improvements are, therefore, impossible to assess until the actual tenant improvement is requested. 2. The applicant has taken a position\ that an ultimate development scenario would most likely be: 75% office, 15% assembly, and 10% warehouse. It is estimated that approximately 687 vehicle trips could be developed from this type of scenario utilizing 14.3 vehicle trips for each 1,000 square feet of office, 3.99 vehicle trips for each 1,000 square feet of assembly area, and 5.01 vehicle trips for every 1,000 square feet of warehouse space. 3. The City of Renton must identify area-wide traffic circulation improvement needs to provide continued public accessibility to individually privately owned properties. Without this formal identification by the City, the general level of service will continue to decline as a result of the incremental adverse impacts resulting from private development. Fred J. Kaufman May 12, 1986 Page 2 4. The previous traffic evaluation conducted by the City late in 1984 was based upon land use assumptions of a greater percentage of warehouse use and a lower intensity of office park uses. Actual and potential development in either office park or retail uses for the subject site generate significantly more traffic than originally anticipated. As a result, revised traffic studies are necessary to reflect the change in environmental circumstances. 5. The City has hired a traffic engineering consultant, CH2M Hill, who . will identify the area-wide traffic circulation and improvement needs along with the prioritization of those needs for the Valley industrial area. That study area should be completed by June 1, 1986 and be available for review by the City Council and general public. 6. If the project is developed into primarily offices (as proposed by the developer), over 200 additional employees would occupy the buildings. This represents not only a significant increase for the need for on-site recreation, but an incremental increase in the need to provide year-round off-site recreation. The applicant has proposed providing plazas adjacent to the main structures for passive recreation. Since there exists the possibility that a portion of the site may be retail commercial, the passive recreation appears appropriate. However, some off-site recreation should also be provided. 7. This proposal appears to be the first phase of a total development of approximatey 115,000 to 120,000 square feet of building area. Therefore, the total anticipated development of both phases of the Trammell Crow project could represent an introduction of as many as 500 employees into the area and a total of 1.200 to 1.500 plus average daily vehicle trips. 8. The Public Works Department has specifically identified an immediate need to upgrade an existing controller at the intersection of S.W. 41st Street and East Valley Road. This facility is critical to the continued traffic accessibility of the subject site since its primary access will be from SR-167 and Lind Avenue S.W. Therefore, the Environmental Review Committee (ERC), under their substantive authority [Section 4-2822(D)]. recommends to the decision maker, the Hearing Examiner, that the application of a site plan approval to allow the construction of a one-story 58.090 square foot building located on the southeast corner of the intersection of S.W. 41st Street and Lind Avenue S.W. is subject to the following conditions: 1. Participation in area-wide traffic improvements identified by the pending CH2M Hill study to the project's proportionate share based upon estimated daily traffic generated as calculated by the standards established in the Institute of Traffic Engineers Trip Generation Manual. The maximum cost per vehicle trip shall not exceed $270 per trip. The final cost per vehicle trip may be reduced as determined by the CH2M Hill Study or as determined by the City Council. • 4 M Fred J. Kaufman May 12. 1986 Page 3 2. The payment of traffic mitigation fees for the speculative building shall be divided in the following way: a. At the time of building permit application for the building shell. Trammell Crow shall pay the amount of $10,000 in cash to pay for the traffic signal controller modification at the intersection of East Valley Road and S.W. 41st Street. b. A bond shall be submitted at the time of building permit . application for the building shell in the amount of_ $92,745 minus the $10,000 paid in cash per Condition 2a above. [This is 50% of the estimated amount of $185.490 ($270 times the estimated 687 daily vehicle trips)]. The bond may be adjusted by the Building Official based upon the final cost per vehicle trip as determined by the CH2M Hill study or as determined by the City Council. The bond shall have an expiration date of five years. However, the intent is that all off-site mitigation shall be completed no later than January 1, 1988. c. Since initial the bond amount will only be 50% of the anticipated cost of traffic improvements, the City of Renton shall establish a data base tracking system to require the payment of actual traffic impact mitigation costs based upon tenant improvements at the time of building permit issuance for each tenant improvement. The revised bond shall represent 100% of the then anticipated traffic impacts associated with the tenant improvement based upon the ratio of $270 times the estimated daily vehicle trips for each user. d. Prior to the issuance of an occupancy permit for any individual tenant improvement the applicant shall replace the underlying bond with cash deposited to the Finance Department or the traffic improvements must be installed. 3. Since the Environmental Review Committee is waiting upon additional information to prioritize the necessary traffic improvements in the entire Green River Valley planning area as determined by the CH2M Hill Study (Covered by bond as outlined in condition 2 above) they cannot prioritize at this time, the specific improvements the developer can accomplish in lieu of actual cash payments of fees. The Environmental Review Committee will provide by September 1, 1986 the developer with a prioritization of needed traffic improvements and a time schedule. ` Fred J. Kaufman May 12. 1986 Page 4 4. The applicant shall provide funds in the amount of $3,500 to complete the master recreation plan for the Green River Valley in lieu of providing actual off-site public recreation. The funds shall be deposited into a special account at the time of building permit issuance of the building shell to be utilized by the Parks and Recreation Department for preparation of the appropriate recreation master plan. Therefore, the above conditions are necessary as a minimum for the preservation of the welfare and safety of the general public and a minimum to mitigate the adverse environmental impacts of the proposal. Under Section 4-2822(D), the decision maker must accept these conditions as binding upon his ultimate decision unless he identifies in writing a substantial error in fact or conclusion by the Environmental Review Committee. The decision maker then has the option of asking the ERC for reconsideration or revising conditions. The applicant also has the ability to request reconsideration of these conditions from the ERC or appeal these conditions directly to the Hearing Examiner under authority granted in Section 4-2823(A)(1)(a) within fourteen days of the date that the DNS is final. Therefore, the appeal date would be Monday. May 26, 1986, at 5 p.m. Appeals must be submitted in the form prescribed by both the Environmental Ordinance of the City of Renton and the Hearing Examiner Ordinance, Section 4-3011(B). RJB:ss 1126N cc: Lynn Takeuchi MacKensie/Saito and Associates 300 120th Avenue N.E. Building 3, Suite 233 Bellevue, Washington 98004 Trammell Crow 5601 Sixth Avenue South Seattle, Washington 98108 COZY , I MACKENZIE/SAITO & CIATES, P.S. [ T Cq�)2, 1 Ti 1ca1L 300 120TH AVENUE NORTHEAST DING 3. SUITE 233 L Li,,_ BELLEVUE,WASHINGTON 98005•(206) 451-1005 Date: August 15, 1986 Project Number 385611 To: City of Renton 6th Floor Attention: Hearing Examiner Project Name: Trammell Crow Renton __ CITY Ut., >%Er TOOK Please find attached: shop drawings � 13 `~ ' ? X plans -samples � �� rw G 14 1986 -specifications -copy of letter DEr'T. change order details calculations Number of copies: Description: 1 Reduced (81 x 11) Site Plan Revision 1 Dated April 7, 1986 X For your use - For your review - For approval -As requested REMARKS: Copy to: Roger Blaylock Signed: Lynn Takeuchi/11 s Mailed X Delivered -To be picked up If enclosures are not as noted,kindly notify us at once. • . \ .1 . „ . .._______ _ , , _______i_______i i SW 41st STREET �y \ . • u. I Oviy� j_ • I I I _�_�_ 1 a•1 i I I I 1 , I I = 11-I-. .r-I I — SITE DATA �� - --- — `}{ I -a mac€ _i1 i AREA OF 517E WQ ! o _ ._ -- - - - �1° _— dd•y ,-• LOT 7 200.075 al ZUI �7 .� I ; I ' I I Iwo __1 .---------._ Y.. -.r2o..LI-L:a�im.L. w° '� L0T8 182.828 e( Yvlt_C1< --'- -�-'-.-.. �. • I I� '•'• _- AREA OF BUILDING 58,090 sf QQ ,•-±i5. . � Ij ° °_ ! PARKING 238 spaces 2M;i'.e�. I 1. rI --- _ r _L • ! SITE COVERAGE 29% I -- Ir — _ PARKING RATIO 4.16/1000 of - r-I 1 "'_• • i �—_•��=== ,,,��� , - I -i STANDARD 175 spaces 1 •, I.� 1 A I ,B i -_ — COMPACT 58 spaces 24% _I I• I°'„• 'I I 1 , I _ Io▪- I HANDICAP 5 spaces I- . I 1 111 I; ' F iI I I I I : t, o LEGEND C) ' �a I ! --_ _�. /° I I � I I,?i I I I I I^I I °01 ( la—▪ •I a j 4' FIRE HYDRANT Z • ° I � --� 9 ,, I^• ! = LIGHT STANDARD�w.r• '•'I 11.1 1 1 1 I° ! EASEMENT CC PROPERTY LINE — • 1 1 — '`f I -- 1 i T.O. TRASH DUMPSTER L \ 11 I --- P I — ' SI p .. FREE-STANDING SIGN Q W 1 —r II [_..,�.., __ __I_ -1 ` _ I'Ii ��� i ri • _ .,.-� STORM SEWER LINE CC Z • ' ' I _---' �-- II —_..,-.1_ WATER LINE I••' W 11 �— ;�� r • 1- I i ___.._ SANITARY SEWER LINE -/ j , ILA -`1_=::.�.__;__,• — _I = . f 'jI� Q • 20' 1e1 2e' 19' _- 1124' ;II'19'-• 29'to f9^!9•- :a' `tar-1e' - 124' l I-. .•i 5.13 ' • 30'WATER RIOHT.o,-WAY i��.w.._ _ �i ° I I __ • �� �- --- }- Nee se's7�6ea.e'.'----- _- _ • i a7a.e• / • • z---- 1 _ i • • \__-_---__ 19'E99EUENT FOR 9a RITM*.9EWER -z- ++ •— ..—_ • / -' �� i'1 I f Y SITE / Iiii• i r I / .. i aw 41.1 9T 2 (IP , / 1 ii ,, .,.. �\ ILi II I .,s,.4. -� •� ,•I SW 471d ST 1 N / \ • LOTS I Ii II ( I n o .. 1 7j\ 'aa/es ) I I 1 n .I ;I., 1��-�_2, / ( . .. PIA zi i--1 /; / v� VICINITY MAP d ` ' T10'WATER RIGHT-OF-WAN; -- ------ __ I f • i TT:6;EA3f7dEHTF0lffri(VINa E17CAa1Df7�1'{i,T___ • •• N as aa'37•W 91°.ee' • .` . . V\ SITE PLAN c 'M SCALE:1•:30'-0• 1 1. 3 •• `•'3ees n �1 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET c1 PPGG'/l,tb'ivsr- REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: P vea `I C kJ D ales, DATE CIRCULATED: itA A' act/ 19 g (p COMMENTS DUE: c7 CJ ii E 3 ECF - - APPLICATION NO(s).. S - 09.7— 8 c PROPONENT: TP_AM.Me 1-4- c,e.8 c_, PROJECT TITLE: S O t.) n-i 4--1 N r sa v nl.�s BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: ee : ti E# LOCATION: s CD44, ie sr SA- L.44.140 4 574J • SITE AREA: BUILDING AREA (gross): IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS MINOR MAJOR MORE IMPACT IMPACT INFORMATION 1) Earth I- 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare !r 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services �f 16) Utilities t� COMMENTS: Our information indicates your development trip generation category falls under general office under 100,000 square feet. The trip generation for this category is 17.7 trips per 1 ,000 square feet. Unless you can provide significant documentation contrary to the established ITE observations from numerous studies, we will use ITE as our standard criterion. See description of ITE's general office attached. RECOMMENDATION: En DNS MITIGATED DNS n EIS REVIEWED BY: TITLE: DATE: FORM #14 r\ REVISED 9/10/85 0 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: 2_010 s c DATE CIRCULATED: MARCH 26,•1986 COMMENTS DUE: APRIL 3, 1986 ECF _ 023 _ 86 APPLICATION NO(s). SITE APPROVAL 027-86 PROPONENT: MACKENZIE/SAITO & ASSOC.--TRAMMELL CROW PROJECT TITLE: TRAMMELL CROW SITE APPROVAL BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO BUILD 2 BUILDINGS OF 58,000 SQUARE FEET FOR GENERAL OFFICE BUSINESS, SMALL RETAIL ESTABLISHMENTS, AND LIMITED WAREHOUSE FACILITIES LOCATION: SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LIND AVENUE AND SW 41 ST STREET SITE AREA: 4.59 acres BUILDING AREA (gross): 58,000 sq ft IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS ADEQUATE INADEQUATE 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing ;T ; 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation j; 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: RECOMMENDATION: 10 DNS n MITIGATED DNS El EIS REVIEWED BY: Cil TITLE: DATE: 4- '�� FORM #14 S • ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: PD L(C- ti `The ✓LLo tEju r DATE CIRCULATED: MARCH 26,0_986 COMMENTS DUE: APRIL 3, 1986 ECF - 023 _ 86 CITY OF REN i OPT APPLICATION NO(s). SITE APPROVAL 027-86 MAR 2._1 1986 PROPONENT: MACKENZIE/SAITO & ASSOC.--TRAMMELL CROW POLICY PROJECT TITLE: TRAMMELL CROW SITE APPROVAL nF`rsLPMFPST 11cP7. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO BUILD 2 BUILDINGS OF 58,000 SQUARE FEET FOR GENERAL OFFICE BUSINESS, SMALL RETAIL ESTABLISHMENTS, AND LIMITED WAREHOUSE FACILITIES LOCATION: SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LIND AVENUE AND SW 41 ST STREET SITE AREA: 4.59 acres BUILDING AREA (gross): 58,000 sq ft IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS ADEQUATE INADEQUATE 1) Earth l/ 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health r/ 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services UT 16) Utilities COMMENTS: RECOMMENDATION: ! DNS .[1 MITIGATED DNS El EIS Ansc7x-k / REVIEWED BY: �s tz TITLE: 7qssis a.T\: rl etiikveP— DATE: FORM #14 �0 • slikkQ ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET /3 KAta REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: `j3A 1 .S DATE CIRCULATED: MARCH 26, •1986 COMMENTS DUE: APRIL 3, 1986 ECF - 023 - 86 APPLICATION NO(s). SITE APPROVAL 027-86 PROPONENT: MACKENZIE/SAITO & ASSOC.--TRAMMELL CROW PROJECT TITLE: TRAMMELL CROW SITE APPROVAL BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO BUILD 2 BUILDINGS OF 58,000 SQUARE FEET FOR GENERAL OFFICE BUSINESS, SMALL RETAIL ESTABLISHMENTS, AND LIMITED WAREHOUSE FACILITIES LOCATION: SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LIND AVENUE AND SW 41 ST STREET SITE AREA: 4.59 acres BUILDING AREA (gross): 58,000 sq ft IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS ADEQUATE INADEQUATE 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 6) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation ,'' 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation • 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: &A„Ujcs2 1dhcutiNALAgi (S yov TA y noptk_A- Aor mi456,,$i61( 10( aocvud (.1 7 K(oM R194-fru/AA wuAld Lgt 4-0 (,i,) \ 4cuuttic.Q y 'P CS5el f fyugyuk.. y1 i (r 6\r\ ))45- << a nyo mux.-Vlf ,L 10Q0 4ctut.v/ reC V eO nn ( &)1 ( pl kn - RECOMMENDATION: ri DNS MITIGATED DNS El EIS REVIEWED BY: iM AS TITLE: I)() 1 1 DATE: 1'1118 " FORM #14 S • ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: 'DE S[G DATE CIRCULATED: MARCH 26,•1986 COMMENTS DUE: APRIL 3, 1986 ECF _ 023 _ 86 APPLICATION NO(s). SITE APPROVAL 027-86 PROPONENT: MACKENZIE/SAITO & ASSOC.--TRAMMELL CROW PROJECT TITLE: TRAMMELL CROW SITE APPROVAL BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO BUILD 2 BUILDINGS OF 58,000 SQUARE FEET FOR GENERAL OFFICE BUSINESS, SMALL RETAIL ESTABLISHMENTS, AND LIMITED WAREHOUSE FACILITIES LOCATION: SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LIND AVENUE AND SW 41 ST. STREET SITE AREA: 4.59 acres BUILDING AREA (gross): 58,000 sq ft IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS ADEQUATE INADEQUATE 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health t/ 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing ci 10) Aesthetics o/ 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation c/ 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: Ost•plgIc- S4cek u Play trior6fetvNkis (05 RECOMMENDATION: P `I DNS El MITIGATED DNS EJ EIS REVIEWED BY: TITLE: DATE: 3 /Z 7/ FORM #14 _a l ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: 11 I-1 L I 1 /ES DATE CIRCULATED: MARCH 26,•1986 COMMENTS DUE: APRIL 3, 1986 ECF _ 023 86_ APPLICATION NO(s). SITE APPROVAL 027-86 PROPONENT: MACKENZIE/SAITO & ASSOC.--TRAMMELL CROW PROJECT TITLE: TRAMMELL CROW SITE APPROVAL BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO BUILD 2 BUILDINGS OF 58,000 SQUARE FEET FOR GENERAL OFFICE BUSINESS, SMALL RETAIL ESTABLISHMENTS, AND LIMITED WAREHOUSE FACILITIES LOCATION: SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LIND AVENUE AND SW 41 ST STREET SITE AREA: 4.59 acres BUILDING AREA (gross): 58,000 sq ft IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS ADEQUATE INADEQUATE 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: f ► RECOMMENDATION: NI DNS n MITIGATED DNS 1 EIS REVIEWED BY: lR . 04° TITLE: /T/C/TYpEiV6/A EZeiV6 DATE: 4// M4 FORM #14 -k ` ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Pk QJ P R E i E l D () DATE CIRCULATED: MARCH 26,•1986 COMMENTS DUE: APRIL 3, 1986 ECF _ 023 _ 86 APPLICATION NO(s). SITE APPROVAL 027-86 _,t - MACKENZIE/SAITO & ASSOC.--TRAMMELL CROW PROPONENT: PROJECT TITLE: TRAMMELL CROW SITE APPROVAL U BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO BUILD 2 BUILDINGS OF 58,000 SQUARE FEET FOR GENERAL OFFICE BgtaSZ, SMALI.,RETAIL s�c6, ESTABLISHMENTS, AND LIMITED WAREHOUSE FACILITIES -An n n LOCATION: SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LIND AVENUE AND SW 41 ST STREET SITE AREA: 4.59 acres BUILDING AREA (gross): 58,000 sq ft IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS ADEQUATE INADEQUATE 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: RECOMMENDATION: DNS [] MITIGATED DNS 11 EIS REVIEWED BY: TITLE: ?316 s� _ DATE: `; ?,,',9tc/6e J /7eG. FORM #14 IIIV I i ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: YO (I G DATE CIRCULATED: MARCH 26,0.986 COMMENTS DUE: APRIL 3, 1986 ECF _ 023 _ 86 APPLICATION NO(s). SITE APPROVAL 027-86 PROPONENT: MACKENZIE/SAITO & ASSOC.--TRAMMELL CROW PROJECT TITLE: TRAMMELL CROW SITE APPROVAL BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO BUILD 2 BUILDINGS OF 58,000 SQUARE FEET FOR GENERAL OFFICE BUSINESS, SMALL RETAIL ESTABLISHMENTS, AND LIMITED WAREHOUSE FACILITIES LOCATION: SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LIND.AVENUE AND SW 41 ST STREET SITE AREA: 4.59 acres BUILDING AREA (gross): 58,000 sq ft IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS ADEQUATE INADEQUATE 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: I I - X lsr u- si ecri ViC Imo�• S� 4 VIcw c(Lc CaJ'' b k_c_e ece se l e La w tk e,,lfs \T `bCGC lop. \S (ApSoLl e 19.)ceesSl� L0(131-CCL ' \N e (:)V' Cuf ee S??o OU4 CS C' S atat c IPS kele rodO�P \ "kc:3 CI • c1-ovcaA. RECOMMENDATION: El DNS MITIGATED DNS El EIS TITLE• REYIEWED BY . 4,0-e-,--/ .� DATE: /may l O FORM #14 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: DATE CIRCULATED: MARCH 26,.1986 COMMENTS DUE: APRIL 3, 1986 ECF - 023 _ 86 APPLICATION NO(s). SITE APPROVAL 027-86 PROPONENT: MACKENZIE/SAITO & ASSOC.--TRAMMELL CROW PROJECT TITLE: TRAMMELL CROW SITE APPROVAL BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO BUILD 2 BUILDINGS OF 58,000 SQUARE FEET FOR GENERAL OFFICE BUSINESS, SMALL RETAIL ESTABLISHMENTS, AND LIMITED WAREHOUSE FACILITIES LOCATION: SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LIND AVENUE AND SW 41 ST STREET `' SITE AREA: 4.59 acres BUILDING AREA (gross): 58,000 sq ft IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS ADEQUATE INADEQUATE 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water Lim 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 4--- 8) Land and Shoreline Use �-- 9) Housing -- - 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare l-- 12) Recreation ��- 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation EsZ 7 4 " /oz7 ,E)/u 1 7 ¢'or o we � e✓a/ oa/j J 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: �o D eve/bpi, p L, pa,�- c zi l v-Z Me-- )2- CL;LI fv C(e-l-- rla_ k/LfrPU2 ��C' E1x�G1rS�l�%oLr -o Lie -�e e 5 $ o 175, m Tom, P 12 CE G -1 Pe o u s A v.Gt.() h ( `{- G L ) -e fa i �w wda L J s�> ,r /7 7 x cF/7s— /9) 6 s1.s Tv�a RECOMMENDATION: DNS ED MITIGATED DNS El EIS '9 REVIEWED BY: Gr. ITLE: '.A � G DATE: 4 )4/ 1 / 384 FORM #14 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: -g CZ 6 DATE CIRCULATED: MARCH 26, 1986 COMMENTS DUE: APRIL 3, 1986 ECF _ 023 86- APPLICATION NO(s). SITE APPROVAL 027-86 PROPONENT: MACKENZIE/SAITO &.ASSeC.--TRAMMELL CROW PROJECT TITLE: TRAMMELL CROW SITE APPROVAL BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO BUILD 2 BUILDINGS OF 58,000 SQUARE FEET FOR GENERAL OFFICE BUSINESS, SMALL RETAIL -__; ESTABLISHMENTS, AND LIMITED WAREHOUSE FACILITIES LOCATION: SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LIND AVENUE AND SW 41 ST STREET SITE AREA: 4.59 acres BUILDING AREA (gross): 58,000' sq ft IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS ADEQUATE INADEQUATE 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: : RECOMMENDATION: jt DNS El MITIGATED DNS El EIS REVIEWED BY: tee- TITLE: DATE: 2-" -1 FORM #14 a, 1124N NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON. WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a declaration of non-significance for the following projects: CITY OF RENTON POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT (ECF-030-86) Application for environmental review to revise the Planned Unit Development (PUD) Ordinance. GMS ARCHITECTURAL GROUP (ECF-026-86) Application for conditional use permit to allow construction of a mini storage building complex in a B-1 district. file CU-030-86; property located at 3408 N.E. 4th Street. The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a declaration of non-significance for the following projects with additional conditions imposed as mitigating measures under their authority of Section 4-2822(D) of the Renton Municipal Code: TRAMMELL CROW (ECF-023-86) Application for site plan approval to build two buildings of 58.000 square feet to be used as office. small retail and limited warehouse. file SA-027-86. Property located on the southeast corner of Lind Avenue S.W. and S.W. 41st Street. Further information regarding this action is available in the Building and Zoning Department. Municipal Building. Renton. Washington. 235-2550. Any appeal of ERC action must be filed with the Renton Hearing Examiner by May 26. 1986. Published: May 12. 1986 1111 i FORM 115 ?. N OT I C E ENVIRONMENTAL DEcLAR.ATION . • , APPLICATION NO. ECF-023-86 TRANMFI I CROW . PROPOSED ,ACTION APPLICATION.FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO BUILD TWO . • B 11 flING� OF 58 OOO �(J FT. TO •RF I srn AS OFFT('F; SMALI RETAIL AID LIMITED WAREHOUSE FILE SA-027-86. - GENERAL LOCATION AND OR ADDRESS SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LIND AVENUE S.W. & S.,W, 41ST STREET ' POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE C E.R.C. 3 HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION . CIDDES CDOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT DWILL QWILL NOT BE REQUIRED. THE CITY OF RENTON WILL NOT ACT ON THIS ' PROPOSAL FOR 15 DAYS FROM THE DATE BELOW. COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED .BY. NAY 26, 1936 AN APPEAL OF THE ABOVE DETERMINATION MAY BE FILED WITH THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER BY 5:00 P.M., MAY 26, 1986 • • FOR H FURTHER INFORMATION \ . . CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON • BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT 235-2550 DO. NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION OF $ ® ° BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT- .- RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR Z1.1 MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 • 235-2540 O9�TFD P SEPSE.�� BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR MEMORANDUM DATE: May 1. 1986 TO: Gary Norris, Traffic Engineer FROM: �t3 Roger J. Blaylock, Zoning Administrator SUBJECT: � TRAMMEL CROW/SA-027-86 The applicant, Trammel Crow, has submitted additional information specifically addressing the use of the proposed buildings located on the'southeast corner of the intersection of S.W. 41st Street and Lind Avenue S.W. Based upon that specific scenario, we would appreciate a review of anticipated traffic from the subject site. 1 In addition, the applicant under Point #4 has suggested a methodology for participation in off-site traffic improvements that we would like the Traffic Engineering Division to review. In my opinion, the basic problem is the fact that the building is a spec building where the ultimate users are unknown. I The Environmental Review Committee would like a response by next Wednesday; May 7th, for their regular meeting. I , RJB:ss 1118N i r , MACKENZIE/SAITO & ASSOCIATES, P.S. ARCHITECTS-PLANNERS 300 120TH AVENUE NORTHEAST•BUILDING 3,SUITE 233 BELLEVUE,WASHINGTON 98005•(206)451-1005 April 28, 1986APR 9 �������� ns;-11 el, 986 • Roger J. Blaylock, Zoning Administrator City of Renton _ 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 Re: Trammell Crow/SA-027-86 Job No. 385480 Dear Roger: The purpose of this letter is to address the four questions you raised in your letter dated April 24, 1986. As you know, we are the Project Architect for the Trammell Crow Company. As we discussed during our conversation in your office Friday April 25, 1986 we are very concerned about one of the items in particular the "methodology for participation in off site traffic improvements". We trust the following will serve to clarify your questions. 1. "Specific uses and areas of use by percentage". We' believe given the current scope of development parameters. The most likely scenerio is that this project will have the following uses by percentage: 75% office, 15% assembly, and 10% warehouse. 2. "Specific on-site recreational areas." Each building has a landscaped courtyard area of approximately 2,000 sf in addition there is a shared area between buildings of approximately 3,000 sf which is heavily landscaped and may be used for outdoor functions such as meetings and lunchtime activities. 3. "Design justification of how and for what purposes the perimeter landscaping was relocated." The City of Renton Zoning Code provides design latitude in a MP zone. In order to provide a more pleasant office work environment, we felt taking 50% of the required street landscaping along SW 41st Street and distributing this landscaping closer to the buildings would be a better design solution for this project. April 28, 1986 Roger J. Blaylock, Zoning Administrator Page 2 4. "Suggested methodology for participation in off-site traffic improvements." We believe the following is a equitable methodology for participation ;in off-site traffic improvements. It is based on the fundamental philosophy, that all the land owners/users in the subject project area contribute to the traffic problems and should contribute a minimum'amount to help to pay for the needed improvements. First of all , the overall impacted areas should be defined (similar process as used in forming L.I.D. 's). All property owners within the impacted area or zone of benefit should participate in payment for the anticipated traffic improvements. In order to establish a base improvement participation fee all properties in the zone of benefit would be assumed to have ability for 30% building coverage. This 30% building coverage will be assumed to have 30% office and 70% warehouse use. Using this type of formula, a base L.I.D. fee for each property would be established. This will reduce the $270 daily trip figure (letter dated 4/24/86) potentially as much as 25 - 50 percent. As new developments are proposed, the excess trips above the established base would be calculated and a bond would be posted to cover 10% of the maximum projected costs . based on the vehicle trip difference between the base and the projected actual . Once the buildings reach 90% occupancy, a bond for 100% of the maximum projected costs would be posted to replace the 10% bond and will . be based on actual occupancy. As an example, the following illustrates how this formula would be applied to the proposed Trammell Crow project at 41st and Lind. Avenue. A. Establish Base Building Area Assume for Trammell Crow site 59,090 square feet is 30% building area coverage (acutally is 29%). B. Establish Base Number of Vehicle Trips for the Benefitted Site Trip Rate Trips 59,090 sf office 30% = 17,727 (12.3) = 218 warehouse 70% = 41,363 (4.88) = 202 59,090 :420 C. Compute Vehicle Trips Above Base 100% office (assumed maximum vehicle trips based on 100% office use) 59,090 (12.3) = 726 - 420 = 306 vehicle trips 306 ($200) = $61,200.00 (Assume minimum 25% reduction of maximum $270) I D. Initial Trammell Crow Bond 10% of $61,200.00 = $6,120.00 Ce'v OF ONION 41 � APR,2 9 1986 April 28, 1986 Roger J. Blaylock, Zoning Administrator Page 3 • We would like to meet with the environmental review committee to discuss our thoughts as outlined in this letter. Also as we have previously expressed, it is imperative that we be on the agenda for the May 20th Public Hearing to meet critical scheduling commitments. Thank you for your time and consideration concerning this matter. Sincerely, U 144'044A; /-16( H. Lynn akeuchi Architect mvl cc: Rick Romney, Trammell Crow CITY OF .zENTO 11 APR 2 91986 OF R�.(v �e ° BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT © RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR aalL • 0 �`" MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH.98055 • 235-2540 094?eCs SEP�CVO BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR • April 24, 1986 Mr. Lynn Takeuchi Mackenzie/Saito & Associates 300 - 120th Avenue N.E. Building 3, Suite 233 Bellevue, Washington 98004 RE: TRAMMELL CROW/SA-027-86 Dear Mr. Takeuchi: The Environmental Review Committee has reviewed your proposal for construction of a one story 58,090 square foot mixed use building along with the comments from,the various city departments. Questions were raised about the actual anticipated uses in the building and how the site should be designed to service each of those uses. Various 'uses create different demands and impacts upon traffic systems, pedestrian access, and general public services. If the site was all warehousing only 320 daily vehicle trips would be anticipated. However, if it was a shopping center then over 4,500 vehicle trips would be anticipated. Construction of a building where the actual uses are unknown makes it very difficult to consider what are appropriate measures for impact mitigation under the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971. Adding the environmental review process into each tenant improvement could result in the lost of many of your potential clients. because the process could add a month or two to the building permit process at that time. The Committee requests that the applicant more clearly describe or limit the possible uses and commit specific amounts of space. They recognize that a methodology for impact mitigation must be determined at this time. Basically, do you have any suggestions? The Committee is also concerned about the specific location of general use groups, ie. commercial, office, and warehouse. Public safety both for emergency access and crime prevention as it relates to the specific location of the different type of uses in the buildings were mentioned by both the Police and Fire Departments. i 0 1 ' Lynn Takeuchi/Trammel Crow April 25, 1986 Page 2 Analysis of the site plan suggests that there are design limits because of the number of parking spaces provided. Based upon the ability to provide 239 parking spaces as shown on the plan, approximately 79% of the building could be devoted to office use, while 21% could be warehouse. However, a more realistic scenario that you should evaluate is 15% high volume retail commercial such as a sit down restaurant. 40% warehouse, and 45% office space. This would require a total 233 parking spaces. Total traffic generation would be approximately 1,500 daily vehicle trips. Please be aware that the Environmental Review Committee has been requiring the participation in area wide traffic improvements in addition to adjacent off-site improvements. Presently, the Committee has consider the worst case cost participation at $270 per daily vehicle trip. As you can see if the complex was consider all commercial with 4,500 vehicle trips a cost of $1,215,000 would be anticipated: however, if the probable scenario was used then the 1,500 vehicle trips would result in a cost of $405,000. The traffic study being prepared by CH2M HILL will clarify the present situation. Both on and off-site recreation are being considered as issues in the environmental review. Employment centers in the Valley definitely need to provide some form of on-site recreation and participate in the planning, acquizition, and development of off-site public recreational areas. The Committee requests that the applicant provide by Thursday, May 8, 1986 the addition imformation addressing the issues: • Specific uses and areas of use by percentage. • Specific on-site recreational areas. • Design justification of how and for what purposes the perimeter landscaping was relocated. • Suggested methodology for particapation in off-site traffic improvements. If I can be of any further assistance in clarifying the issues or questions please call me at 235-2550. For The Environmental Review Committee Lae_ Roger J. Blaylock Zoning Administrator RJB;rjb 2365Z MACKENZIE/SAITO & ASSOCIATES, P.S. ARCHITECTS-PLANNERS 300 120TH AVENUE NORTHEAST•BUILDING 3,SUITE 233 BELLEVUE,WASHINGTON 98005•(206)451-1005 April 7, 1986 Mr. Jerry F. Lind Municipal Building 200 Mill Ave. South Renton, Washington 98055 Dear Mr. Lind: RE: South Lind Square S.E. Corner of Lind Ave. and S.W. 41st Street Project Number 385611 In accordance with our telephone conversation of April 4, 1986, the prospective use of these two speculative buildings will be one-third general office, one-third warehouse, and one-third general retail space. Owing to the speculative nature of these buildings, it is difficult to pinpoint exact percentages of final occupancy. However, these figures are in keeping with the market projections of the Owner. _ _ L The project has been named since our submittal for Site Plan Approval . "South Lind Square" has* been chosen by the Owner. Please add this information to the appropriate forms on our submittal. Also, enclosed are six copies of a .more detailed parking layout you requested. I hope the above information is helpful in clarifying any questions you may have, If you need any further assistance, please do not hesitate to._call_.... Thank you for your time. Sincerely, 1. :'U(j ). /1167/e0,c '4 Paul R. Makowicki , A.I.A. PRM:mo enclosures WV OF RENTON rn-) M F.1 T APR ` 1986 '_ .- BUILDING/ZONING DEPTg - - MACKENZIE/SAITO & SOCIATES, P.S. IL, �� O© � Q[aRnii°e, 300 120TH AVENUE NORTHEAST•BUILDING 3, SUITE 233 _ BELLEVUE,WASHINGTON 98005•(206)451-1005 Date: April 7, 1986 Project Number 385611 To: City of Renton ?00 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington Attention: Jerry I i nd Project Name: 385611 Please find attached: shop drawings ._X_plans -samples specifications -copy of letter change order details calculations Number of copies: Description: 6 Site Plan For your use _X__ For your review - For approval -As requested REMARKS: Copy to: Signed: George' Jakotich/mvl CITY OF NENToN Mailed ?,9 �i Delivered G.J. 4/7 --� i -To be picked up 111. 7 BUILDING/ZONING DEPT. If enclosures are not as noted,kindly notify us at once. / tifsY o '' TY OF RENTC� FILE NO(S): _ 4 - B .DING & ZONING DEPAIRTh u T - -• - 86 di cm, irk 1 • ��N�o MASTER A ' L!CAflON j NOTE TO APPLICANT: Since this is a comprehensive application form, only those items related to your specific type of opplication(s) are to be completed. j (Please print or type. Attach additional sheets if necessary.) APPLICANT ITYPE OF APPLICATION NAME 1 FEES j MACKENZIE/SAITO_&_ ASSOCIATES 0 REzoNE*(FROM TO ) ADDRESS ' • • 300 - 120th Avenue NE, Bldg 3,. Sui to O SPECIAL PERMIT* CITY ZIP 233 0 TEMPORARY PERMIT* Bellevue WA 98004 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT* a] SITE PLAN APPROVAL 322.95 TELEPHONE SPECIAL PERMIT FOR GRADE AND FILL 451-1005 No. of Cubic Yards: [::3 . VARIANCE* - ' CONTACT PERSON From Section: NAME . * Justification Required Lynn Takeuchi ADDRESS , SUBDIVISIONS: 300 120th Ave NE,' Bldg 3, Suite Q SHORT PLAT • CITY ZIP 233 ' CD TENTATIVE PLAT . • Bellevue WA 98004 Q PRELIMINARY PLAT TELEPHONE Q FINAL PLAT 451-1005 WAIVER (Justification Required) OWNER NO. OF LOTS: NAME PLAT NAME: Trammell Grow.,.= ' ADDRESS • PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: 5601 - 6th Avenue South Q PRELIMINARY CITY , ZIP 0 FINAL • i Seattle WA 98108 P.U.D. NAME: TELEPHONE 1 762-4750 Residential Q Industrial QCommercial D Mixed LOCATION MOBILE HOME PARKS; PROPERTY ADDRESS Q TENTATIVE SE corner Lind Avenue and SW 41 EXISTING USE PRESENT ZONING PRELIMINARY vacant '. MP FINAL PROPOSED USE PARK NAME: General office/warehouse NUMBER OF SPACES: 1 1 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE ` 98.75 • • SQ. FT. ACRES AREA: 200,075 sq. ft. 4.59 acres TOTAL FEES $421.7070 _; _pi 04 Pal �ad1, - - F USE ONLY -- ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESSING / DA1 ,A @ ' [I4:,J �� 1 APPLICATION RECEIVED BY: lam+ � r � v Nei ft g� 2 6 __ APPLICATION DETERMINED TO BE•. t'1[� � �, g Accepted Incomplete Notification Sent On By: BUILDING/ZONING DEPT. ' P (Initials) DATE ROUTED ADDITIONAL MATERIAL RECEIVED BY: c_ 4—8-8(0 -2(0 -b/�, APPLICQTION AcceptedDETERMINED TO BE: (� Incomplete Notification Sent On By: (Initials) ROUTEDTO: 1 Building gliDesign Eng. . ES Fire VA Parks i\ 1 rg( Police ialPolicy Dev. MI Traffic Eng. ~/ Utilities REVISED 1-31-84 � v Legal description of property (if more space Is required, attach a separate sheet). • Lot 7 of Koll Business Center/Renton, as per plat recorded in Volumn 114 • of plats- on pages 15 and 16, records of King County; situated in the City of Renton. County of King. State of Washington_ • • AFFIDAVIT I, Lynn Takeuchi . • , beIng duly sworn, declare that I am authorized representative to act for the property owner, owner of the property involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS 19th DAY . OF March • 19_ NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, RESIDING AT Bellevue Marsha 0kino ��� 4 (Name of Notary Public) (Signature o wner) 4431 153rd Ave.--S-:-E:-,,Bel1evue, WA 98006 300 120th Ave. N.E. - Bldg. 3 Suite 233 (Address) (Address) �'f,.�:.�''.,°°°°oo` ':%?, Bellevue, Washington 98005 ° ° L; 1 (City) (State) (Zip) PI)F21)4C ° a Y a n`4) ° ccoC,,0 ��✓° .451-1005 9°o° ,,i,•, -- O V f,p,c°a, 4, (Telephone) Acceptance of this application and required filing fee does not constitute a complete application. Plans and other materials required to constitute a complete application are listed in the "Application Procedure." Form #174 7/ . ... • • . —N y ' fir,,,,, ���ti�• .� � I • I �� • •' • : - 0 * . 141111. . . • . . • et . . • . • . . .. _ . •• . . . . . . . . . . .. . • 41- ^ I . ; . 0 LO BUILDING TWO 1 • . • • BUILDING ONE • 0,_ ; vo'-o' • 16,302 SO.FT. . 18,302 30•FT. 20'-0„ 40-0' 80'-0 • '. ,' C-K- . • : 4011-0* •. . ' 40'-0. • •.. 1 —86-0l EXPANSION . v — 7: _L2::0 v v 'v c � ., v v . . V I . . _ I Sakae - .2 �, • PHASE II -- CCH Computax - 45— . Bearings, Inc- 6 Fantasy -- 7. 98'-0•: Mazak - 8 . . , .. . . • . . —1111r lt, ., Al . . .. /` ._ - E L1 ♦♦ ♦♦ 1♦ L♦ AA ♦♦ f BUILDING THREE _ 111 68,358 30.F.T. � • .. , • 80'-0" 50'-0" —� 130'-0 TYP. 21'-8' • • • _. d , • s - , _ _. . . • _ : v - N.W. { obile TV '- 7 Aicken - 1.2 • Survival • Int 13 ' Scan Design 3 Alltel Supply - 4 • • NORTH CITY.®I' NZOt� • SITE PLAN o zo 4o B0 • R L'a.r.1r■�LE ® ® • • Tramme11CrOWC0mP1Y• SPRINGBROOK I - •• - 011161 ' .. • • • . . , . REDMOND HEIGHTS PHASE I - - .. .„ .„ •, ., . .•... t, ..-.••••••••• •c.,.•:q., ••,•-• . . , ..,.•- ,-, . • . . :..... . . .. ,t .... . CITY OF RENTON . . . .. 1,...,....It,•,..'T..,!..;,..,e,t;i:?. .. .Asgn .±;:,'.t,'?'r‘,,,;.'.‘'n..',V,I',,;.".:'4. d''.' 7•''..` ' • • . .. R ...,,,.. ,...„.;,,,„..„.„/„.„,..„....,....4„0...„...,..,...„,..4„„:„.....,,,.....,....44,.:rp.... ..,.....•...:.,..„.„,:...„.....,„..,.........,., •. ., ...,...... . . . .... .„ ...• •:„. . • .. • , . .„•••,...,,,..,. ., ,,,, ..fers!ri:r:',-4.',!3.-',:"'"i 7''-.- ''' ' , ..,.... ; _,....•I'.:'''.:4.•.''.'4...i.:.i.?•?;;!,...,- 1,:''..'1. ......3,-.1.Y.,;',*%..V.is.:,;,--..--,,,......y....`,41;;;.,.,,,:".!:,,,..1.4,1',........:,,.:,.-..' ..,' ' . ET:` '.,1,:,;n1.4.','„:i,.'444,...`iii-op.41..1.''.1.tl),:;4 W-.....},nrr tr,gt,'4',10.+4,4W''?;;.'-....I tIL.Y:--Y•f-4'.'".'''''..r.-'' * ' -., • .,_ .. .• .4.,•ta,..,:,, ,,...‘,.4,f,,.. Ci .,.,.i'CPf,7,10.': .F,. ,:., ' .•'. ' ;' .;! ?;0„,.,Tfi,&•..:Iit,,...44A-evAifiztr-4*."?,-'1'''A','''''`'`' -' -'• •' ...-7,:.:, i-'1"4i i'..`'•. ;YAgic"-r-;;;*IC::";;Y :Pa'f'T:•,,Vgilit.,W4'i;4.4"0.,;;1,4,,;„*;ivfiL, '..-:.,'... '' :', ''. L',L ,...,.0",-If': ."'•""•', ''''''''• • . L, 4.,,,,,,,1;.,,-,;.:,:;;";:i".:L.:,::.:4:6'''''''': ''''',1.t.;;;9'••::1,.":,....,n ,;.(iflk.n.,•A',5cit..41r4r.i'lt •.:;,,:.. ....,c4TACrf:dV441','•?.`;',0•••/- ,411 ;..:••• NI/r•Y'1-01•?.,;-'•' '•••:?•.;• ••.%i•-:• .-:••:'• , JUN 1 0 1986 - --- ' .p.., --;;. .,.,4,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,-*.,,,„,,-,,..._ -0, ,...,..--.,;24,4%.,,,,A•qmk,-.,..,:!„;7,,,,:„.•70.•111,,vt ::;:,..-‘,. it:04 ..tfrviWn.,,?•:' ,, . 'I"- '''''''• '':''s'':' . ''' 'A.-111k '-040 'l'".:.: .....,:;r: ' .. . ;.7 I,.......,,: l'-..A ..I.i'1M,tO.It:t la V....4 ON ,...:`:,'.',.....1!;..V.Z.Y1,', Vir44)1'':, ......4'0,,17- , ';•':.'MI ''''' '-'n.' '' 14 Ek ..... . •••••. • F1 - • i '' i• '••••iP.4"-':".1.:.• “•'••••:.-.-. ''' .i• • •!--',T• •i.i.'4.'5.1' %.7••• •s'I'4•••••••!..'-•-f'•••••••••••Itell' ':•'..1'....I:1/p . -'''••'-•.4 1.46,. , - i -t+ ::•.;• . rdiv.lq •rAtt 1,7 .'. , . : .6 - ., . • -- -:.. .-,::.---Ilii ,-,'-,.--..:, ,. BUILDING/ZONING DEPT. i? A , ..4,.: .... b ,„,.., d..,.••.,.:.:...,. .,„ „„,,, •t7;•:::.1:1.3.,-!4;,1 6,1H..," 'F.,,, :.. AV,,. .:.,„.:. : ... !......,...;: „.•. ,.'1, ....,, ..,:.....i•ks- ••,....,.1.•'. •- .: . 7-,: .•,.--. , ...;,..,- . ,ms.w,,,..,..s1:„. ..,...,, ..,,... f,•A.-',,..!,;4,V'MAL i,..1 t..:: ',it: 'e: =,;... i I 1 V&•.,;,',,,r4..,...;.,..'.t."•;,".-,,,,,,,,,;•.j.,'"=!./T;'.iti,,, ,;,-;.41.•.!:",....?".!.i4,;';.,,-..jj,:-.'.' '...." .., ,"." e-,.-....?-:.-7..,-..4.,:;•';':i.i.:••••• , :•.:,*-rs' : . -% •:.• ••••••,:::‘•-* ''''•'..•:.:::'*:: ,,,,-'4'VW r,',... ,,...'•.- .• ,--;:ei,,,;::.••.7•,,„.,''!;$,'S•„,,';'.i...--..';,•4.,.1Y-itl,:.: ••••'1!•;;A'...;"1,X.-'ail!.4-g,..i-zA-J-1,4giv.•,•ttv.,"••-ilTr.',?,.•:,',f•'•,';••-.• .••••••• •••••.i..,-,••••:',,...i.i.;..----2,,,::,,,....-;:. ,.....,•-.:: .-:,---•::-,..:,.....• ; ;....-4-;",•->-,....,k-,:•.--- t•-. :• tit.-'.'•-•:.• •L'.!..-,..• - :.•-••-•-•- lep• 3,,,,>>51.fi,v_z,ftV.;',A5,..0.-••!;;Iici.,:f..3:?-'7.:t•, :t-oeic=7:':.i•-•-••,,,,oa'7....-.•=i,,f,- ;„„;•••';•,,,...7,7 gaii-4.•::::--,1,-,:._•!:-;-,:, !...1, 0,...,1. ..44);,',-,1,.,•-,,- ! lqw•!-”•". .,....,:, .-k,--, .,,..„. ,..if,.-.,5. t,......., ;,..,,ii.-ovil.p,—, ..,. .:.,,,-.,;i,,,./..: ','.:'...P`i....b'•.S•4'. '(:'.11'..'-•',1 ItOpt•.••i, 41):,•;•.-- ,t '-•L ';. . R :, :Ors v.1.1r 41.A. - - HH • •,‘ ',. 5, ,.. - ,,,,,,..„..,,,, .,.,,,,E,. .....4,, .., :.--,,,, :•,,4,.. , .,. :... ,,,,,,„,„;.:1•43.1p,. ff.':,::::.!: fo AIN, .r..7. 7.''',,,; ,.. .11.krij. -,:;.;. iiml.t: 1,11101Imp,.,•;},:,, _ .. ,,.-.-...-ovr 40- - , •• • . - . .• •iy•-..;.....--,--•.) •,•••=,;:•, ••••-', - .....".,:•-fcy.. :-..-t. ir,f'. . R,..,. -imor 4 6,i':'•i'S.: i:' •*. P• 11,,•ir 4 n...,A,i-...". i •,,f II ip. 1,. .. - _•._ . . _.,.7.1i,-,..,Anioe.:4 ,-,„0..,,,...,,..„..:.A.1._,:.„1.L.-1112,,„„cr.9.,..... • • • .... •:,,,...,..t•:•,, ,.....,4ii.,,, •,, .. , .... It ;;..17.;;;‘:c... ''',..! •..• g'' 151 '--•1 iii' .•2*'..... P - .••••••'Ne',4A;24:1„* .. ,:j;•%1••••'• 541,1*..,•4 •I'-i*,•;;;4,1,0),;LiaViM2 •-"Ji."7_.:-_—:. 1.•,-,??,,-'---,i,...,•:.:1,-.iv; •'•••-•.1"::F..N,71',,;,:firsil.: /— iiib..2,44:;,,,A. .:.-...;:.:e•-.4:-1 . iiP.i..........._. .._ __ -iv ...-. ,,,o,,,,,.., . .. 4101,41,,,,L.....,.. ,L:,,,, • "rk ';'4,illial;.1i1:';'llralliNilf,; 4t;16V.•.),---- - 1411)••1,7r.'',,..N;t•111:40i , Obit,•••".... . .441h, ...,•,.•,•:. ',, '‘..."*415111F02.•;,i1S.W.,e)* ;h132:1-::-' ' 1,11,..,, .... •• '..11 :- Akirol, „9.111.•%%; ';',*fs,..,-...,. ii•'..4:'.... „,..• vc,..7.4,'... VACANT . '••' !Ili ".', ...Awe.kiiiv41,- .-T••••,',•.-•••••'-•,,.,,, 11111 DATA 1/0 - VACANT . • .., -•,..•...,.....--7-11 • •---/ - • ' ; LI- 11, ' ' . . • .....sk%,',•.!, ,,•:,•tifigir-, -it.':',..., "k'zr.• -. , ..,' '•, N,Q.:4:.\,,e,!.t,•-",,i,:ii.;,i.?,,,..,. :•••,.-r7:170.•;,..t,,,,,•!t.e. 4.-:.1....:-.,,.:::::,,..,,, • - , .. tNikk•i,,,-'-f'"4 '.-i,.-:,,,',..4, i • ;,•,...,•_.... ..4-3••:r•:.----,.1 1 •• • • -..P ••••••1.41'•!.''Y'i;,''GM-...,,,:-, 1 • BUILDING B i 3 2. • •, • • . 1,1 .:••.,,,,,,,,,..„...,,___.„,,, • , I !- 0 ; . 0- -- , . .."-'-'-$, pi.-.-• . i ! 1 BUILDING I . • • • . • NZ,,,,:;.*”`•.:,•;, ii• •••(,•••••V'1•:'.• l'410.-.••;', ..,31• -. .„ ., . .• \ .-:. . 7#0.4i;,./ c .;. ..•.o : .. - !1 I 1 24.416 SQ. -T. • • • • • .. s.-4:.: i . ..-,,,,V:k 1111 ,:l 20' f11,41.:!.:,:k..,...';:.111:it. :'.:;,;:,...,...,.. :: 1._....1 st 361525 .SQ. FT. • 514•• :-, 3.fr•el ..,........,?..,..,- , :.0.... .-. : 13 •--,---• • • .,•.' !-.:14'j.g..-.4. ..cii" ;:.:4 • • TIME \i„,•,•!...---:,.. ..-..... •-• - ..-6,,,.. •-, N..1,,. :::.,.•6,„ „..1 ? ••.••••,..........::- ....t 20' ' . '• ... ,F-'11.11•1•-•.•,74`,-....".•••Ow'''''''`.- •• •'"'n'''''''...•..-..,' ..,.•.-•t•• •• , '.••••-:•••.- .•: '., .' •-•.-, • •••••‘ft- 16i -0,,.1•:.:S1-. •••••::-., ' ELECT RON-10kl.':•1•:•iv\ii:•••:10:tA'G' ''''i...''''';'•1;0.•...t!.'.2...'..•'••••::., - .-,7:41,.•-lg. .406 ..i .----7--7---7--......t-t...-„,-.4.--,.,...,..,. •,„,„1,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,••is,....,•...,t.*,,,,,,,.;..-,/,,,,t.„-•-•,•;,.:::',•-',.E.-..i...••••3,-,1,,,:y''...':;:.;2;2 ''. '":.,-,;'- ;, :..,5•4;••3.;;•.z.,.t.. 1,,,PLerL.L.,/„TS,W.-.1*. •Igallw,:iF;"•A,'77:E. F3,;•41-75%'!!ii•W. :;:c.','i''::-.6•;,:l j.', .... •,;.,-;,. FL';:.'....',:: .-.::', : ',. LL L.::../:;:,..-'• * , ./.:;••41.‘Wi'n --:',',L,412;P'..t,'•-•;,.. '',_ ' , 0,-,.. -1.•?,,,,,----:,,,,:,. ....,-;1:: • - ,-,":-,-,•-•,-,-.T.k-z.k.A.,--e....tJ17,4-401-4.,A4z.,,,,,„,,,,H1-30,1,,,,,M!..,,,--tvi.,4q-zift.44:74..4?,:•;IrieiT-4k-,-0,. .4,A::.;:.:, ....!:-:::::y,,,'..,)'..,;,i,..::.;:. ,,,-:...;:.,:. ?. . :, ...-.-.: . ..,-,....„,....-:::,.. .... --,,,,,,,-‘42,,,:,-44-'iN,.:-....-.,4,.•:V.i.,4--"..: ' OW ..t. Lk•-, .:k!,-•:,4:3-. .•-•-....-f-, •ii'l...,'•:'''''-', ,nAvg},44°-11.044,Iffi;6'?,:;.iiiii4,%!',..itti.t.,53.„,cnts.,,'A'p_att?:Trtlye,4@?,-JA:i06i..1::Nr.i.v.:-..,4.,....!,--j;.v:,.!:::::.1,?..,•,,,,,:..,:,.,,,,:t....;..-!,:, -.'.,..1, T.''-;,'K'.".,‘.4- '^"Lr, ''0'.09•• •ziii .''' 1,1 -:',.;11?:!: 0 s.,Ali,?;;?i'Lr`'''•?..'i,:.1::: '• ',';:. -. • ,,,- . ,ao \ 11., .44 .:-.•*,•,-,',."---,-.-. .'' ! 7,t,„itit,,,,,,'•••-,f-;-i,k.:,'4.0.4,,•2•6-tiv-4,- h'it.,0,41.-04---c4,13.4"..c,...;oz,1-.),.•4•P:T.!•ir.,:i!i:,,,,6•31,14:,-,3.-, ..;.:-•,b•z:k."-'4.-.,...•,,,I.-.-..i..e........,.,.„„,:.,.,....- -., ,...5.,ti?,,'.,:;.;,i,1,1FA'i:1V '.. .4ri% ..--Z.() ''''...4K 4 k,,..*4 0 iii' '-'r• 4, ....-..v .,...- .z.',.... .,,. .. .v------• ' , '4..t '.:.•v,"',1-...aqateti"----1,..c..::,,r4...,.-.fro.,,,,,,i....y,,„st y;.,..vt.„:-.•-p-1r•,•••••,---,.-;v•q4,-.' • .,-1.,z-.......,,I,•:••-•••At . -•-•:•:.,:.-••••i 1••••:-';‘•••,••• . : •,.•••;1.1,••,,,••&,••.• •,,i.. \AP•"."'6'' •i 41v:i'LZil*i,;,-•''''11"..v.:1134iftild-01,''''•4-ti,ri.::=.C't,t.._,Ve:',4*.t,q7.-4;,_i•14.'-*::... ;ILL.',,,,q,•-:,:.ke:)--,..... • ', .,-.:: , • ..": -P",,, --7:-Lii....,-;',:i,;,-,..,4;',". Ze5144.:-'17'••>, '.''''''' ,41,,/,`'s 0''''%-' ., ',,';-;/:-'''':tY -...::,%:, '.', ',,-A\-r.,klitr,f:1717,_4.w.z.,•11.,,F;• •:.•litz;•-1.v.v..v, 4,•,:,..I.Ar*•!•••_•ii•••••••••,•-•••,,4••-•,--,•st 7A• .,-.'i•-• +paw••;?•••••,; • t ". r-7 is a * - , ' •'. .• 'f'-'• ' ntfilp...,...2z.i,sc.:,;,-,11.-',4',.;•''. .,,,;:?...Li.'-L-:.,..flhe \rr ',Vt.:iv...44p;,.. , ''---,i.::,,,,.; .-- - ., 41..5-irip0:'ariarnaTilti'4,,kM,Ir.,AV%•1•Z•.'''-•:•' ri441• 1.4 i.;•;.'i:L.'1-'` i.:1...V. I.."L, I i `,- •Cl',,•4..'.•••••' 141. ....mt..", Alt',•'44::,.,., ,,,I.•.;.,.-14/1 ig,r",44;-,7.;":„;.;...,',",;;• ., ii,,,,ii•••,ii i.:,,,,,,,. ''''..4‘%* '''' P W•510114M'q.%4",4'•;4101 fib,'44 ''''' ;t *N.4 '...PI -i••.'1_ .."73' ''''P 7:- .... ,,,,, ,,,,.,,,,,,;,,,yerarsav,-..-•,---!!,-F;,0„;•7.02k*Avy-, • - ••,,,•1...t..•:- • . ',.eVykVsf11‘16 . '‘ ‘,\.' s l':. , -:'.* 411 '''°.xi,...4'.i,,..,. ....i..z, ,''''':',....<,ta'..,,.0„,...,..,--,: •!.,,,,,,.',4?‘;.•1*1-••,,,I.•;,4,.."•X . " ,.,'t4.Vi‘O.,4,•,r.l.4:,•011re,,,,'-'41:171.p":•:gW,F,P..,‘.-.441A1.1.°.11V,7:1Witry•;••ift4a..4Fe4.19..;*},•%7;0,?*trW et;','''••-*-.:•••••••111$•d** !*../. -1**'- ki 1.‘ 154r•i •:'* '•*•.'';'.....'. I•40.• ,40g• -.2' ... ::''. •. ‘•N'4-'410,v:•:•1:i;'....-:. ••i 4'"'.' •'.:-'1-1.''i-'•/:',Iri..„R4- VIViiiie.,7)WV.411r,'Z:4;','-i41.teW.AW,?,x7).q.-1,-,...e.:,,,?:',',3:,:;;;•TV:s.:-,.',1i1;.*;f_.yz-tp.,Qe/ie.'...::- ':-.1..f.,e,;?..:;...-'. ' sysTEms_io` ,..„1:44,(5c....s•F...:,-,f'c.. (044, .6.„,-1.1.-;.,: .:v...,-.._, --: '' vIANIC`•:-,-4iii..:: :.'"''''i:ti'ily'lli)a 4...''''',;.-.Vay.'.,,,fal.J',-j;c,,tyA0k.1;-..;,K;'ZIA-;. git-Z41.iitkl:.'::i4V?:: :_i6V.:;::'-'f,t,'..liZ:Z?1,4„Aticgt ,:-':Iligrill-.„„IiI,l',. ...c.i... • . \‘,11{.•• ,• :',.4,...;:•••.i.millt,".,.' • ,a,AA: ,.,...... • , )::.\ -,,,•1. ,•,.. - -., „, a 4. ,, 1 0 ,et'".0-1, •'''','"'C,,12."'Ic 0'AZ:.t.,.,r 4‘41";3 4!. ,......•.... ••••Ilay,...-i<';i7,,.., .. ..,--,.... ., -...,•:•',V,.:,;:z.. .,4'?.p-,••:,. ,11.--F:•••••?v,„„44--.„•;.,....1(.;•....1•5 , \ . ,,i.:,,,,,,• .,...- .s."2:..i,i.=j.',..F...•... ' .- '••404(5,:lii ''......;.., ','!.4 ,'-''''.••• ••=.,),,4 --0 . .qcov,;.i -.,.,410'."•_•':‘ '''.;'''.-',-;;;--;: -.'!,',..",..."7;:_,;•••;*•"4...1tv..,..,:t•)4.:.,,R1A,..-'...''' '2. :*_::;•,7.;.•:: ::1,7'..is;•.,;:•,1s.:?:1::,1,1:.:''':;I:,;.i:-;;e.-Y?..;.1.fkr.V.,..4`..."."';::;.:= 1-.I--;,',. ,.,,3,>,,,. :..,.......,,i,..1, ,-,.,,z,,,,,:e..„.:::..,....;..,.,, ,,•,, ,,:,-.,,,:,-.,.;,,.....;:::-,,,,..i::::::,,./,?..,,,, ,..;,;;•,.,,...::.,,..,4_,.;!i-A,ligtr,;;;;:if,,.„.7!. .,,,,,`.7„.,:.-„IfiA':.J.1;7:21-1-:,,g,•:,',::!..::-:-.. .;:f',.•,•:5:',.t:.J.,;f:),, %,(z,".',.'7.7::.;:;.',...-;.i i. " 13 1 •iNG: A • -,......;::,1,y-,1",iii..,5.-, t...,,,4'it '',.:'•.;--•- .'..,C-yit.!.:.:,:-•_: --10/11--4; ..---11... ,e, .,. •, ,,-..•`..:•,:, •-: ;•,..,:2-..1-;;:•,',:,-,!,;'..;Pi:.:1,.*;:',I;',',.-::''.!"-:;.",;::',.:-.5:: •::;',:.-.-k*,;:"•;',5.-“,..i",•.;;;,:-?,').:::.:••... 5,2:1.:::.-.,..',..p-,!4;,',';:v:„-,'.;;;;',-x;;;),; .,:,-,.::::-,-/&:.• *:t....'2)\?,--77,777,1••:-$::':;:I\ T ...WAti•ar A'.§.j..' ' *WAY" '''?...': • 17,436 SQ. FT NOUVEAU -: •tli.:(W%14 '":'-'• . .(t'•i-r-4'.-. '''-it(:.....' . .•..':-.:",... -.. ;:..,,,,;,,i,,:::,/,;:.i.. ...-•,,,,;,:i-.,•.:••':....:..,::;(.3-.;;;?,:,-...•-:tis..4,W.:Ig ',.'?....`,:i:!..:-.-r.",:;,-..-_;:;::',''...:q•-:.i..:1:"..^g;.,,,:,.iyi-".A.‘,.1.:,:s;.,,,.,.5.2.,..,::.N.:,-.,:.--?....-_-".„- '..fi,.:•...,f,;:.,:-...;..r,.„.1.:..?.,...sc.,1,:;:v..;...,";.::.:.;:t,.jAil'?f.---,,,,• NOUVEAU VISIONS .... ,i...,,,,,,,, :.;.....,.i • d,..1/6),,.- , %,'.....';.'•.1.: :.,....-2:1,2):::::,4.1;:ii- -:','.',1.1'0.--1.'"... ....;';' ,. ..A !.;if--.'5.:.'-',.. `:,4„1.-C2'....,:?•,,'...'1.,i,..";P41'..,.:2.: -.'..v',4,,;,:t:(ti%Ci):_::112. 7.;-;;-3,,;,;:jk;i:.,,,:',•••• ;;;*.:3; **;Z:4';''.'.‘•':::,-;*, :•;."%a-,';'• :;AYkd '- '.e) "''• .• - •1 • ,,ki:W.,,S '.,:.,: .•,, , _At,'ef,07 • :;.:;;;.:7;,:.:.".:::'i:"•:.,-)',•''•,-.....'..;•;'-1:,..:...::'...:..: :..:•,1%..1.,:-.- ,...'•'.1.:::..."t:::!::::•!.::(i:.17 :-`e.."%..5,;':- .i:':::7.`t;*•';:ri`27 ri'!:•:;';'4:*"14.1.: ,1•?'?'•: ,:•;,' ,:: .... ..1::.•,* •:X.,`..0..";"7,..::ri:':;;774,''N:",..";9 7 I W.•:,V2o1;.‘1•.*i•:,..: : . s:,/• " •"?:.•,. • P•rao (5,. •g2.,,,!..,:::„."..,!";„:.,•:;',.":,..!..,:•••:••••;;•.•..,',..!••!,..•.;,.',...`, ..;.,I.'z _,..,::1,•,, ,..;„• •1•,,,••;••4=,:.:;:;•;,•:4',...*,, c...;•'-•;'J:i•IkVi'-' ig'-'1-,•• ;'•• •-V•1•;.'Y'•:--.7 .1,s•efi'.,. ;•1, :•:-';‘':1.-:,V;•;;Fi,.:•:.0;•.1;W•;,1•4Vi::;;•;'.., ,46'. .t4AP '•'.2.-..-4-.:i•4..-;4:•'.. \ . • . C's,i•• !••• •,•,.-•:!•,•..wikilip .: . • ,;...,--f,-,.,-.t, ';•••••••;:,-_,•.-;,,......:,••,.•.,:•,.•••..:1i••••' ..;.,1 , .... „.•,,::-•,•:,!••••,..:,,,,-,:',.:-.,,,,,,f,ifZr.i.''$,:-..•i'..:. ..A•;•:.:;-:.,:.;;-;,,,21:2:•.V;I'F.'See,-':•f:`':1•;?:::. 1r;•:n'•'••;••'.'1',!...:,,,',4.2,11:,!:•,••::;:'••••,,,,, i;:.it;-,1 .-'';-;•!,.; bzer..i.:,...,.,:i.,.".•,,..1.'.••',.?:•...,•:,..s.,..:. \ '2f::::.-:,,r;-.4'r-:--,;,...; -','- --'.., '..-':::i- • , -.qe.7."•:.z,2,-.1trc3.a.;:•, ,.., ,•,,,c...;,:i.t.',..V,i 1,.. ,‘,;:'.'.::,,';';',7;'.'.:o„YIP-'*:!..,,:.Ti•`,•• •:,:•,•.‘*,•.,9;•••;,;v. r N MA GL 6 *I..fre••""..', <' 0'4'••.•.'..i.• '.':: • • •-''- ' - ' " • ''•' • * •• .1 • •- , -*-'.`• -''.'-' •0',-.:1••,,,,N.-I-:'''; ,',..,e'''P'''''i'f.=',,"'''..•'Y•4-`•V'''•''''•••" 7.,g•et's,,,:..7,:,•''',P.,,t• .:.r.t•r:?•,,..,i.,..-....„,1 1,. ':••.•..,;•..,..• .e• ,..',..4.ffliv.,0"It,s$'••,4 . . ‘. „ ., .; ., ., :,,.,i i,,,,,,,,,,..s.,,:m,,,'s„:,,..,,,,,,..,...,,,,F;:Qt.",.. ...,:a:.4.;.''') :4',.........* :WP.11.1..i.',V.41.r.i'r:,...V,.(.7".:Cck. ..1.'tt....P'C''':'',14:';''.'4,''..'.4:1 ''..' ...:'.. ...\ 41j. i.13.46--itt. 34:4:4..•: •„:,•1.„...•jr,,410 1..j;•.1 ,..14.:4,-.Ft.v •- •'.''''':',••-:,•:',.,1-"t"",. ••:.'•-..-•,-1 sc•','..t.,::. '--••.,' ...,.A,,.: ..-• --;,..,',:•:,` ;;,•„-•,''1 -•;:••...i.P5.-,...•..,I,..4.r....,..,., .,,.. ' -11,:••-.---....r•AL,,,,,,,,,-•- . ..•i-.--.-.. y\ '• •;;:;•,•.:(.1.•••0,..•„'•,•,:;-r•;,•,''':••',•;...'.,,-;", •• .:•,..f, .',J.;,.:1 i ir...:,••••• .:1-5••:- ..;••'I.` •• `••.•—•' ` ,V,,L,.•,1,WO ..f.._„`:-• . '' ....'• •,.''F,...e?(Y's,••••••,• usi - , • % . , :0,....,..,--: ., •..."-.:.- .,ete,,,,- .. - u.„-,-•...,,,e,...:4.,-.,,,::„.;,:7,„ .,• :. ..I.. \ .„,....-,401,,,,,t ......,_.: .ii !'-,,-.. . • ..,.- ••.• - ,r,r ,...•1/41:g•yytpRe,rrii ,45.....' 1:" `4e.;•'•:1.,••• ''•,;;.,.::,•:.-....,:7:;,,-:,•,..,•-,,..,",,i.:,.-,5•il-.J.,„a,,-,'„;,i;?4tt a1l9w/-0r 4t44.,,'0 l,l..vt."..0.•:'•.•.",....:..%..i:.•-v.,.,.,,,•..:.\,i...,.•..,•; 00 , '..'It.itt.kls'rt.s-t.,,A.e 7.•..A.•.•;".•..•,:.-•,:t-,.,,.;-•.,..ri-a„,':,. 'r•i--••.;;,c••••':..::.t:•::,:40:-•: -.:,,•z•••. r0•V... 70:1, ,' ..V.1:4,,A,Ms,40,,,,k;\,,,e.•,,,,.1, .i,:-'.,•••W,t,'•• --..._._._____ v..' w•••,•-•••••.:..-,,Th"... ..1`•••••••• ,11,0404kti.',;:••' • ,----••••.1• 0.5. '•"40*'•*.:•Y '',41‘ ifiT,-;:.k,it.l. • Ap_I•'..'s:7-iir.:.?;,•,.,••,,1.0.!...1:.--- ,..-.;;•i• •:„._„.„7-z,„.11.1i.:•:::•-••L-11, ---------- ..t.--, ,-,..11vi. ... ;.1,:v: . .,:.;:-...i,..v.f.,p,. .1,72_&.„ cv....mq ,:, • •••.,- '.47-?•• ,_________-----_—_--------_-____-----__-k,'j tfr•-•.--.7.-A;.-'i:: •---------___.','-i:-,::.;:-,::A.4.,1 '..t,•:;:ii,, -‘•1 ....ik...-...ifiN.4,•••'•••r•ii,'•.S.i!:;'•".'li;'fr.•.1'' __________—__________________ _„.1..14:- .9.4.--!.....ti:•.:::••., i I----._____------2:—._-•.•--,••••-It,.,:-... .y. __...- L.,•;.,..i;.:T.:7 ,FY,;:rt•If°•*.-;••.' '''fi.'• 44,W; . 1 7.frii7,77-....74:.,;;;;-,''..,,',.:i„••• •-4,f,.. , ..f.;;.-„,:i :..•• ....."•...i,-..f,..;,- }fl.7,...,,, ----___= -------------------IV ':*n*•=4'.'4'77:-•••I",'k%' .'.' ' '' i**firr.•11,1,.1,7''••-^",'1.-",:r3 t•i,...,E. • ------------=—.---.IF.,: ra'ii.-5•517fP•••:t,•..::-.:,. ., •• 1,-:,,::7• .;..5 w••.., ,,•-•f.. ...J-4:..'•••........_ •."“)-1, ...7., --- --- ----- J,V. '.42f-.N1-2;1 •• :,- ': •• latt_2 .rdi•-e "2.• ' •-•,..- .1,..;',Y.',••-••• ..- . _....e, .,':••1):4:.;,..:\..`e:i,...,•;:i-!.,".--',1:.•-••• •,• :.. .•...;•:.:::,....!..-:::,:,..y.1,-;‘,:...,,:...,• ;,....t• '-'41.t''1-.:,fi'f:.• ,..-......:,:-.-,,.::•,',.•st-p-.••••.i.i.,, ..... . • 5p ;!,./. -%.'::::'...-,....f.:' ,....,r r ',,.. -. Y%, • .t.l.'..... 4 :.',-.v,",';v. ......".44,..-•-•-.1•7:f••••_...'1,;.•„...:;•*:•"k,J'''4,••••/:* .•.1 --- •:-. ^• -----.;•::•:••,',..;. :•• ..1. •••,. •';'• .'7* , • i• , •,‘• 1 V4•7,•;, •:,i .1,. 4.7.--,:,‘. ".;:*:7''`:-'1";'.';t-4 '.°•••'!. .Cf••••••••''1:P:.•'t.C4;.: '-'- -- 6011fffli -...2 •* -,,-.-7.•••=f-'r*W:z• •-• -••-'':N't... ....- .:-....•_ ..• - _,•-•,.• ..,..1...,-_,.. .... _ ... ` - - ` '`--^�... ......-' ~' -~-� -- ^-._-�-_^-- ------�--` ^^~-----^^--- ' ~......... ... - 3PRING8ROOK PHASE II S. 180th. STREET - ' '--^ -- -`~` ' ' --- - -- -- '' ---- ' - — '-------- --- -'------- - ( S. 43,d. arnss` ^ ?�"'i MORRO ES t1,7) NER WA � ` ' ' , OF R4 f. ECF: 023- s/ LU: 4$ © 0z City of Renton• a -a� 7-�d ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST 09„'So SEP�EMO�Q Purpose of Checklist: The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43,21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for allproposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. Instructions for Applicants: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully,• to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply." Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different "parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impacts. Use of Checklist for Nonproject Proposals: (Please Type or Print Legibly) Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D). For nonproject actions (actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs), the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: No name selected as of this date. 2. Name of applicant: MACKENZIE/SAITO & ASSOCIATES 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: 300 - 120th Avenue NE, Building 3, Suite 233 Bellevue, Washington 98004 Paul Makowicki 4. Date checklist,prepared: March 20, 1986 S. Agency requesting checklist: City of Renton 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): -Construction anticipated to begin August 1, 1986 -Building A and B to be built simultaneously in r j�-fl MAR 211986 i •� BUILDiNG/ZONING DEPT, 7. , Do you have any plr For future additions, expansions, c: rther activity related to or connected with this proposal? if yes, explain. The possibility exists for the Owner to develop Lot 8 to the south of this project with a similar pair of buildings. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. None. ' 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. No. 10. List any governmental approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. None. 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the-project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. Site: 200,075 square feet Building: 58,090 square feet • To be used as General Office/Retail/Warehouse Space 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range if known.. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topography map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. Lots 7 and 8 of Koll Business Center/Renton as per plat recorded in Volumn 114 of plats on pages 15 and 16, records of King County; situated in the City of Renton, County of King, State of Washington. • B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. EARTH a. General description of the site (circle one); co rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? 12% in a very isolated case c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, caly, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. . Medium dense to dense .granular_ fill of silty sand and gravel d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. No. - 2 - • e. Describe theC' ose, type, .and approximate qua\ es of any filling or grading Pro radin osea: Indicate source of fill. P The existing soil has sufficient structural capacity to support the `. build:i ng•:—_'..The.4rati o of cut'to e fi ll will be approximately equal on the site. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. No. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? 60 - 65% h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: None. • 2. AIR a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If. any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. -typical automobile and construction machinery emissions. b. Are there any off-site sources of emission? No. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: Minimize work machine activity during peak traffic times. 3. WATER a. Surface: No. . 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds. wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. No. 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. No. • 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. None. - 3 - 4) Will the prc )al require surface water withdra ., or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximately quantities if known. No. 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. Yes. Entire site. Green River 100 year level ,27.2 feet 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the . type of waste and anticipated .volume of discharge. No. • b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and appaoximately quantities if known. No. 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals . . .; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, ,the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or • humans the system(s) are expected to serve. None. c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. Storm water from building and parking into catch basins and directly to existing city storm water drainage system. 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally .describe. No. - 4 d. Proposed me- es to reduce or control surface, end, and runoff water • impacts, if a ' Thorough grading of the site, contain runoff water to site and , into City drainage facilities. • 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: o deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other o evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other o Shrubs 10 grass o crop or grain o Wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other o water plants: water lily, eel grass, milfoil, other o other types of vegetation Scotch broom b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Existing vegetation is low scrubby grass and will be replaced and altered in accordance with landscape plans submitted to the City. • c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: Use of native plants. 5. Animals • a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: Birds: Hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other typical native birds. Mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other None. Fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other None. b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. No. . - 5 - 1 d. Proposed me, ss to preserve or enhance wildlife- _ .my: None. 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil,-wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. In addition to electricity for normal office use, an electrical heating system will be provided for the building. Natural gas will be stubbed out to the building to provide for any additional unforseen future requirements. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: Buildings to meet minimum Washington State Energy Code. 7. Environmental Health - a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure toi toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that; could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. No. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. None. • I 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: None. b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? Traffic, railroad - 6 - • 2) What types an) ;vals of noise would be created by associated with the project on a s.iort-term or a long-term basis example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Short term - construction machinery during normal business hours. Long term:- traffic during normal -h_ours:_ • 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: Effective coordination of construction sequence to minimize any excessive or unnecessary construction equipment. • 8. Land and Shoreline Use • a. What is the current use of the site and.adjacent properties? -site is currently vacant. -adjacent property used for a combination of retail., general office and warehouse spaces. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. No. c. Describe any structures on the site. None. • • d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? No. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? MP • f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? MP • • g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? None. h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. No. • • • i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? approximately 125 - 150 j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None. k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: None. - 7 - A • 1. Proposed n . ..w ures to ensure the proposal is co tible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: Project complies•with existing condition and is in line with proposed area development. 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. None. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. None. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: None. • 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed. 16'-0" - painted concrete and grey light 14 glass in dark anodized frames. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? No intrisicly valuable views would be altered. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: Building's set back sufficiently from the existing roads with a generous amount of landscaping inbetween. • 11. Light and Glare • a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? Glare is possible from window glazing, but would be minimal . • b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? None. c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None apparently evident in this area. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: Glare minimized by the type of glazing used (grey light 14) . - 8 - 12:- Recreation a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? None. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so. describe. No. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: None. • • 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. • No. ,b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: None. 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. Lind Avenue and SW 41st Street. One major access at mid-site off each public street. b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is,the approximately distance to the nearest transit stop? No. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? 239 spaces provided. 0 eliminated. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or'streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe • (indicate whether public or private). No. - 9 - e. Will the pr_,z t use (or occur in the immediate•..z.:1nity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe, Local rail lines:ar..e used to the northwest of the site. 4 f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. 1027 trips. Peak volume at rush hours. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: Promote carpooling measures. • 15. Public Services . I, a. Would the project result in an increased need for public servic' s (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. No. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. None. 16. Utilities a. Circle utilities currentl available at the site: natural gas, water, refuse service telephone sanitary sewer) septic sys em, o er., 'b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Underground conduit to connect to existing city water, storm drainage, sanitary sewer and telephone service at public right-of-way. C. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Proponent: . Name Printed: . • • • - 10 - \i\\ #176 11-8-84 • D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHE N=OR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (This sheet should only be used for actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs. Do not use this'sheet for project actions.) • Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types • of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms. 1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous sutstances; or production of noise? No increases to water or toxic substances are 'forseen. An increase in the amount of cars to the area contributing to emissions in the air would be minimal relative to the existing traffic flow. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: Promote carpools and use of mass transit. 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life? The immediate site area has no significant wildlife that would be affected by this project. Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are: None. 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? The proposed office/retail/warehouse project should have a minor affect on existing city systems, and deplete energy on a'heating use basis. Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: Compliance with the Washington State Energy Code. • 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; 'such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers; threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? There are no environmentally sensitive areasin the immediate vicinity of the site. Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: None. 5. How would the pr al be likely to affect land and .:reline use, in1cluding whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? This project is in compliance with current plans for the area and • would not adversely affect proposed land uses. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: Increase landscape areas. Minimal building profile. 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation orpublic services and utilities? • Minor increase in car usage of public streets. Increase in the use of sanitary and storm drainage system would be. liow. Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: Provide adequate connections and interface with existing city services. 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. There are no conflicts. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true• and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist • should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Proponent: q2141 ,$?l rat)/C L Name Printed: Paul Maknwirki MACKENZIE/SAITO & ASSOCIATES Architects ' I • - 12 - . Imo_-' �•i. MACKENZIE/E- .. O & ASSOCIATES, P.S. ARCHITECTS-PLANNERS 300 120TH AVENUE NORTHEAST•BUILDING 3,SUITE 233 BELLEVUE,WASHINGTON 98005•(206)451-1005 March 21, 1986 PROJECT NARRATIVE The two buildings we are proposing for the southeast corner of Lind Avenue and SW 41st Street in Renton contain approximately 58,000 square feet of space between them. The project has been developed to provide flexible spaces for general office business, small retail establishments, and limited warehouse facilities in a mixed use environment.. These two buildings are essentially symmetrical about the courtyard that separates them. They are to be built simultaneously and construction is expected to begin August 1, 1986, provided all City approvals are in order. The vacant site to the south has been master planned to house two identical buildings with a landscaped boulevard separating the two phases. This second phase construction is presently contingent upon the market response to the initial development, and no timetable has been established for their construction. The partial plan that has been included in the submission package shows the flavor and play of the enclosure wall with the variety of depth and configuration of the entries and glazing . We feel this project will compliment and add to the quality of the development of the immediate vicinity. Paul Mackowicki mvl MAR LI �6. � 1 - - MACKENZIE/SAITO &' -- OCIATES, P.S. ._=-EUTIE -_TF 11_06b1[17 Lam 300 120TH AVENUE NORTHEAST IILDING 3, SUITE 233 BELLEVUE,WASHINGTON 98005•(206)451-1005 Date: March 19, 1986 Project Number 385611 To: City of Renton 200 Mill Ave. South Renton, Washington 98055 Attention: Building Department Project Name: Trammell Crow Renton Please find attached: shop drawings -plans • -samples specifications -copy of letter change order details calculations Number of copies: Description: 6 Site Plan, Elevations, Landscape Plan 1 Master Application for Site plan Approval - Environmental Checklist 1 Check in the amount of $421.70 - For your use X For your review - For approval As requested REMARKS: • Copy to: Signed: Paul 'Makowicki/mo ,; rg 1\ll Mailed 4 L.,, IL, i i Delivered by Frank Heffernan/mo i511 -To be picked up ` ' II'lAR 2 1986 BUILDING/✓CNINc fgPT. II enclosures are not as noted,kindly notify us at once. • ENDING • • OF FILE FILE TITLE . A / .4111•P OF # • •• • i