Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLUA86-057 (2) 411erlieli..71'.111:11d11114.111‘ : _Iir 1 ITT till.'''-.7•111.-11%. . - ''- . .41 ‘ 4 14?.0.49re a ;14.20'6 - gair, - ''..' - . ,,,,,, ...,... 1.... . I ,milis .0.,, er, 0:1;31 I*.- -,,A.- . ,!. ,...._ , •;,,, a t 149. v- ;Aiiiki.• s r.--4,-,s1:\ \ -,•1'- ' -,4. ,..3..: -.."'-' 'O• ', SITE . iT d �— -.--....-:"--....7.0..—r,s,,.:- 116.. ‘NArk.:. - N..., .': 44 .1 ., ., 4:iiiii.:.• ,1,1,..4„,„.i„...„ : :, t ...ii ,4' -' /t -.!64%..1/4T.Ik• '-'. -44,4,,t4 -'4)kt,fr44 I-Q,It- --'"'"..."ri;!‘/.,--?,11t''- ' .. ; • � , Oh � 7th r- " . ,V, t: . . 'I. i . . \. ; ::'.. 1 ; • `►. Powell Ave. i ' Conceptual Master Plan k i- ` -,. -,, ,t ±; BlackRiver _ .`� Corporate Park . •1., h.� - i . q ° f _. : VALLEY 405 �__._. ' ;,' • • `� �� _-, ado RENTON. • WASHINGTON 4 _ lair{ 1 J 1 I T�, 1• t . • CITY OF RENTON p��gp�p9°(/y i, ...... FWST CITY EQUITIES ' y Yy. - ,;; .? rg YOj • ,R' : g `. LEASON• POMEROY NORTHWEST `S � �� �.''. Grady Way r J UN 101986 t•��- MNCHELL,.NELSON-GROUP � ' ^+ . . .. VV r•, .. - 4TJ • me"µ--- • . • • yr , { A: . ii. BUILDING/ZONI VG DEPT. .• , lc ?' H s.. • • N} , 2492Z NOTICE OF PENDING SITE PLAN APPROVAL RENTON. WASHINGTON A SITE PLAN APPLICATION HAS BEEN FILED AND ACCEPTED WITH THE BUILDING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT. THE FOLLOWING BRIEFLY DESCRIBES THE APPLICATION AND THE NECESSARY PUBLIC APPROVALS: DESCRIPTION: Application for site plan approval to allow the construction of a two-story building having 93,170 square feet for office. manufacturing and warehouse uses. and variance application to allow a cul-de-sac road length over 500 feet. GENERAL LOCATION: Located on the east side of Naches Avenue S.W. at the 500 block. PUBLIC APPROVALS: 1) Site Plan Approval 2) Variance 3) Building Permit r The application can be reviewed at the Building and Zoning Department located on the third floor of City Hall. Comments will be accepted anytime prior to public hearings and during public hearings. For further information on the application or dates of final action by the City. please contact the Building and Zoning Department at 235-2550. • __---- , ---....Ict-4:12-THorz-H FAIL-gat.° ! . - .‘,.,.0,;--were-6---inv-c. -.37+.17- --- --- ------,:-',ZN . /,i�J,�,�- i ice:, /. / VAKIANCE '41) j% •/j SITE / LOCATION.. / f KING COON rnl _ ' __ - / c PUMP 5rn•no A ( I • TO 6E GOAIST. I I SUMMER 'sc.. Q o Q 3' s Z 1 Q 41.1 v .5. LID 3Z 3 vi N :4> Q S re N j 4 A. METRO �' d W O �° DISPOSAL 4 0. O 41 4 f o �JP- RA9� J U Q....\ k V . TABULATION • I `• 62e Alma 187,022 SF. o o - F . - t\ �\I . ss\\ Areaco.03,170 0E. T- .� Foct.hd oe.400 S.F. 4. .. l E Poking , s Compact Patna to G i:a.._...� il s .sn__ ..., ..,...,� 1 / Total Porting 202 .. .„..,,..,-._ ... b.. CU \\ \ 1 0 ... \'t.8 '''"I.F.r:1:1:7:::::7.7:;,::::,1;r:.:NL:tr:X1 . \ \ \ • -,-,7.f. e..fr.,...."..50„0, \\\, . \ OPtiamd \ • / Futwe Phase `. m « .,.._,..,,,.w..... ....,. q�� 0\ `, � ,� o..,a U e ll 11 1'A N asr a 7oo3ar _ oz _.., it' CO<¢ • 11 , LEGAL DESCRIPTION \' A___ ��,_, ! ! I ! Ili �il "Jli ! IIiIfIN! 1 ' �i' ' ' I ' II" I ••� N �•�+� `j�� '� _ � �' ' el Phase I .` r �1 #,# 4L. ' ipri F -$ 1 9 C :e! 2 wcew Z v'.'4 \ I 0P Y -- 1 -_ I(�' • II �' I =T+rJ / - i�'f... .-4 1 MO OESG1vlOI 'oa,C," ' I771ki , m II P• I I ' I I I I I _t_1 1 \ �7 .(I/��'_.i'a�.--r.= :�E M,as...4v�.. rum 61. _ It` • 'I _ = _I_ I'� . __' ; 1111 ' r �I ` — ADMAC BuItg • ; . VICINITY MAP No seela a i • I7N , ' b. b� a. 2 — ;� ' eV. . Ym.r_. f--" _ ai�+.�-Cb�p- - . : _y: i.. m.Mr s1.-: � a.i..r wNi—�` ° - .. �-:.. T�n-- -� d• aOk R _w---- �, FAfQ,i+ C — , _I `zV -.a:"" f?nrcf e+'cu__ri_ m_: }- I ' �': r too•5 I'd WOO'W-, �t5 EJSNilT � 31'� n ry'--1 „.„ -:1•- ..... - tovsd .—�� _ •..wMeoaw�. I•� Q --cry 10 I I I I .�i 1. r ul 551 01 .._, 0 \7-3O., I t c 7 I A7 1,sv c•K;�w �_ W SITE PLAN ,,. qe --�'�y� �p$ Lnneoewo Moat 8 I Cry %1 _ - > - w: F. - - ��.f ���i-_ } . _- _fie_-- - o__ y NC, _ .,f i �'`�''' / c.�� •.air.,ri pc,,v � _ y�4 ,�( ./t �?v„Irm wN' �=:✓'� ; I ` W/I `-- J GSVN ' + I- Aa IIP 8e007 SMUT NO OF I . - - -- -- _ ___ _..�_.__._ _�_- _._._.. _ ._—. __ SITE PLAN ,nol: tea, 1 2492Z NOTICE OF PENDING SITE PLAN APPROVAL RENTON. WASHINGTON A SITE PLAN APPLICATION HAS BEEN FILED AND ACCEPTED WITH THE BUILDING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT. THE FOLLOWING BRIEFLY DESCRIBES THE APPLICATION AND THE NECESSARY PUBLIC APPROVALS: DESCRIPTION: Application for site plan approval to allow the construction of a two-story building having 93,170 square feet for office, manufacturing and warehouse uses, and variance application to allow a cul-de-sac road length over 500 feet. GENERA L LOCATION: Located on the east side of Naches Avenue S.W. at the 500 block. PUBLIC APPROVALS: 1) Site Plan Approval 2) Variance 3) Building Permit The application can be reviewed at the Building and Zoning Department located on the third floor of City Hall. Comments will be accepted anytime prior to public hearings and during public hearings. For further information on the application or dates of final action by the City, please contact the Building and Zoning Department at 235-2550. • :, .�.� PO —I C�YOI-4 1 ----- _ �� NOR1"�017- JFAIL�� • • � • j�-s PvE s.ni-- _" _ .\ VIII l'°'21..1 1.4&'AlW4 • / / VARIANCE '/ A° 41) •% , • •,j/ • SITE N- � / LOCATION-- KING GOUNT V' _ - _ // C DUMP STATI O►J / TO OE owsr. +� 1 SUMMER '$h. 4 I I Iv If 7 Q 3 s Z Q ri1 • v �. LID 52. in N • W Q > ee N > d . 4 `^ ). METRO �' J t J LI d ; 0 o DISPOSAL Q 0 . V. Y 0 yJP� a9{ GR I . 4-05 I . - -. ....-- .... • ( \ it) . •••,,, \s, TABULATION \, \ \\ N \ 2.,-.7.3.1 r..T.7.7..T.-.=.:..=.•.v.•.r..7.g.:: I . Sao Area . „ .1437..,e.,,=▪r,..3:7144.3V.3'..”-13'..... . Is Badding Aloe Gcs.930"S-F- FA','.7 „\ '\ \\ \1 Forking , 4, s , \ ' 4 .• s. A, Comae PaIrtml .:‘ ,Meaf,ft-7,,,r--........-sau tun,.••.•••... , , •IX ' \ \ O• '„39,e • ...e/. \N;0.., Tote Perkins 202 :131:::11.............................................. , ^., CC. ' l . \ \1 ,d iii'''...:FIE▪ F,IFI:7:37.374,71:7,5.:7:1.1.7.4774 ' \ 3. % ........-:.,..:,.........„.......,.....„. . ..„,i.,,,,,,:,......„,...:-....:....,.....r.,..,..--. a) ..... ' ' \ \ \ ....12=^7C111 111114@./. 4.1.•••••• tt...7•Fin":EFFE•a:11:1::15:Xii'i To":7g ; moo no...woo o an•Lou ou...... CO \\ \ \ ),5.1.1• t... \ • ::;.7...11 r.r.;.-.7.m.--..z..„-r.r..-..=•ar.=u : 0 . '\\ '• \ i.- OeClortal \ iFf.T..E,F:ii..FiEZ=1-7.:1,:.::::•::1171:2:,.:',ii : 1, 0 -- . \ ' . / Future Phase 0 ..............._,....•................. le=.15 C . .7..=rm......c.r=7..=.=:t:I: N. o g \ ,.., .24.-mva,:.................aZZE 4 , , \\ 4.,\s :::,.....x..g...T.T.T.tiii'.4.:0;:',,1::.:::.!':.!.17.`-`.:.1it - t c-, tro M 27 Eri?..7r°::'&171Fa11:°F::.71VFiri 101 .—Crg , , 1 qr, N EF:irj......LV=2.12......................... * \ -g., . - c....R 1065.37. "".."""`"""""•"."`...""'""' \ 17., .... 00.....o.. ...... ... .....,...6..........P1211.1.ff11,2r.L.....-..-..,t-..----.... ..-. s'SN/ LEGAL DESCRIPTION \ A IiIIIIIiiii.diliiikiii1.11111111111.1 '41'. '. ! '" ! ,'..., ..... ' viE ' I I: Phase I 1 f: -1 —- ' .•-. , _ _vey -41•10...„Aft- 2o-a 1 I 1,1) ( HI ik iiill1) -901 ,f _.: --i Li , • \ •' ,/ ;• • . ir , \ , 1 [ 1 - ., ..........•...,....., • :\— I I . — -&7-41-,, .,..- 1- , , „ . , , ....,•,, ......., , II c - : --,:l•-,. .-:,-- - 0,...„-,- •,,,,,,i4,...;•:t -.., ......... mn --j • [ . . 2, ..,......'to,,'.I L.,...r7.; .N.,,E--•:. iii, . .2:I I . - ADMAC BuiltEng ? P - __ VICINITY MAP No Serie, • 4Ia 1 i : . "'a cp....,--..„, rd,-,l'e, A-,.. \ , ,.-__. ,, .4 co ...... t a.I • . a is.' i re,3z1,..r--.J., ..•, r • FN I L-; ' ,- --1' \ ( 1.-- -----/ • ti .1.1...o• ''IlT771."--. • 1.,''1•''-' - ---- --- 77.1F-7 II [ - ' r f Fp.• -1.; -3... '• , 4. ';'"'`...1'P.._,....s. e,,,, , :,':',.::-.:GFV.,-!,-!,1'.N. '-----F Perkltr".---- -_-_-7.: • ,10.0.S l5•00.W'-/ -- -1 1.-MP 'r-----t•- '- Pk' ---1."1 ,,,,I,..;,.,... ri-It_ ........n• s""4 - k...) ' , ; • , , . -•, ;.::..:,-, 1 , I ! I 1 , • - .. . -)-----, tosr 4..-Pat4 \ -• SITE PLAN -- tarataceno Ar ."1"--Z"--'\.----------,C. __....,....-------'----,;8 LancInc;i2o Area 2 d 8 ).021.• • . • .1 . • • ,.. '•1! . ! ,• / _l- • , . •. .. . ... / • • •• • 1 • 7.---4-- ) I , , 3 1‘• 3...._ __, . . -1 j--- L_ ___i ..J .acr, •6-44111 - A.1 SITE PLAN Fi3o1 i Coll01. ....... ..... -..................... ... ... . . .. ...... . .. ,.. • f` :.:y;',. NO. . . :`kr::'F.z • „%Y,'t''. � $.... f� ;s3' fl ....��. '. t4�' � �; ;5 :'r,' • .-'.. .� ':,'C.., :'s: ;. `4'N g E ' f'%�Y%• � E. ,r* f 40.....,..':„.:41:: .'• • "G'•' qq t.g' +� J, y „s?o,l+ 1. . r .4i'.; %• • ..-:..;4 J. , - • :.i c 'fin y: ‘ . • ,. , ym ,..... .. ..,., . , .cc,. F. 7 ••• '54...•"As, .c:, .. / «'�"'.r tom,. , ti"" �5: " 4 7- 44,.— .dot , .•.f..R3? kit''..-: ,sin ' .,'r/9re /J� 'i'3.' ... ' 1! .:;;;IittA ;: �ii It, '` 5 ... 411111110 i i. ' 4:. .... > • Olit •%••.' Y/ t7;a 'b 'fi .�R !'r f !h • Y P • yY • �' •�F. a,. ,.`yY: ?r, ... . .� ik i',..,.4. , { n? ,, YG .`�.y zt .t t. ..1?,. SIP: f. • lF c s '%f: 'Sy' r h'' .P, a% • b ,...'. ....:1!..1!.,!....., Y' • itliki:T, 54 ` r, ( L p.. • R. . ,> ...,.,.. 1;:;i''' .;;;;;',1!!!!::.0.:. • • ''' !?SN. . • • ' " ' 7 :Qi 3'',y yyr ♦ !? L ", .' !"'i' �, ;y Y i • t , A• :. '%�+ ' ' >/ . ./ i . : S # ,Yi • "i 'R t %• 5 4 '!yi 4 . f.A U5:,.�.i,c ..:', : • kf:'+ .l.tr:a,'"1,,.i?.5055*•..... ... .15.4.f....5.....„5.:...;;? 1 i .,...., ..,!,.5.!... ...,...,.. flE. ' :Yk:i5;h'' 3:rtj` _�_. .fyr..e '.n: Y--' >, , s :. f i �xrrs ; f:.s , 'kr V.f .::. ,- '..:;..Y ....'',,.ti .:it.::::. .4 ?i?:: x•� ark` t:: p;�..; .. y • 9 d. :;r% # p fir;},t;,. r.Q/ �� �t.f". � 9 r iG:+ N. r` !" • } 4 .v+:f,sy :xto. ,gym'' r40 war :N::yj "'r, ,. .. ... .. . .. .. . . „ „. .. . ,:....,. .:..„ • , . • •, . ...::,J::„......).,:,.,:.......• i' >st" ..r.,',r. ['..srx•!^'/'' ,.,,,+aW%` .r iJ't, .:g .. i .„...:.:...0m , .,:...:...1...... p v.. y ' ' �.,}}i. / ?,,, y>' N"S `! ;j,: •;••..!::rti .3�.,s,..t' ' c' iy 'y ',3' rn : i. . y� H,, .:i 7 , Cam: insr r „ tl „ 4 '':f. �aR � ..t`Y 'y` ` ",:::: y u4' r •'! . %::�' S:',t':�;','S:,;';::5!::: .�,v4•l`ar ^ +'{5: + }f cf?��". f'•w'n r;.,p h,5fft :..1,'...C.::.:.: . ;5/�; -ice %q 3 y l y , i i s- #).Tr "S:Y; 1' r.:/ t� ,� y ..' .5«fit: • 'i/.•. :r 'vt � #, y:• !h:� y" at. .. «`!h`: %� /'fin' ,y: 'Sp ...-%.: z.l' loe:'''''<. ' ' Y rj .' 'yyr;,, Ey 4 "t' i'f 'y� • �,y ":S : r.ri.r.+ • 3 y Y, h. •• sx may;rG �',/:'. ,.��.•.:'?< .af�at;::;, t., r. j,� S " �hr':�/ 3y1 S", 4 '�y ;W.:k\s ^ E, • 'r.i,�r s./,;r h%.t.: 'i,:4Y':::'l .. /: fr «. r',. # .. '.,''...ii • . ••:.A. i :,•.....„:„ . ••••:,.,,:r.,,:::•:•:,.t.,.:,0;,,,,,,loy:,-):•:;:a0,,: ,- c...,•:.),,(:,•:„. .....:••••• ,.... . •••• •,...„.4,-. ., 4'.* .*.*••:,• r.'-'.••• .'''...,...' • , .. S:, S • 33' i`' e 0. am; 9, `i, • ,'-•. !.f'.r /gay, .. a'.. ..."»t .. ,,., ... 4r.: i> 's '`. .:r'4". ., 'iK•..{", i' •alp' . . , _. 1 S LP L beGla l loT i i.1 ' THAT PORTION OF TRACT 25, RENTON SHORELANDS 2ND SUPPLEMENTAL; AND., THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 23' NORTH, '-RANGE 4 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, ' WASHINGTON, AND THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 13, AND THE , SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: . BEGINNING AT THE SOUTH QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 13; THENCE NORTH 00°58'28" EAST ALONG THE NORTH - SOUTH CENTERLINE OF SAID: SECTION 13, A DISTANCE OF 884.84 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF TRACT 26 OF RENTON SHORELANDS SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL MAPS, 1958, AND THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 72°37'52" WEST ALONG THE SOUTH BOUNDARY OF SAID TRACT 26, A DISTANCE OF 382.60 FEET; THENCE NORTH 70'54'02" WEST ALONG THE SOUTH BOUNDARY OF SAID w ' , TRACT 26, " A DISTANCE OF 73.51 FEET TO THE EAST LINE OF THE , N CHARLES BROWNELL DONATION LAND CLAIM NO. 41; THENCE .NORTH ' �+ • O1'24'04" EAST ALONG SAID EAST LINE, A DISTANCE OF 950.58 FEET TO w w A LINE 35 FEET SOUTHERLY OP AND PARALLEL WITH THE CENTERLINE OF • nl v, - - THE EXISTING MOST SOUTHERLY TRACK OF THE CHICAGO, MILWAUKEE, ST. . 'Iv - -- PAUL AND PACIFIC RAILROAD TRACKS; THENCE ALONG SAID LINE 35 FEET ' an • SOUTHERLY OF AND PARALLEL WITH THE CENTERLINE OF THE MOST - SOUTHERLY TRACK, ALONG A CURVE TO THE RIGHT, THE CENTER OF WHICH BEARS SOUTH 15°22'32" EAST, HAVING A RADIUS OF 2,790.19 FEET, AN ' - ARC DISTANCE OF 659.24 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 13°32'14" • 2,14• R=1102.4b ,: TO A POINT OF COMPOUND CURVE; THENCE ALONG A CURVE TO THE RIGHT -13.3 ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE, THE CENTER OF WHICH BEARS SOUTH ' 01°50'18" EAST HAVING A RADIUS OF 1,102. FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE R'2-1 659'24 L,807,1 <'•57 OF°807.11 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF641°56'46"; THEE SOUTH6- 49 53 32 EAST, ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE, A DISTANCE OF 167.07 .91 6•• FEET; THENCE ALONG A CURVE TO THE RIGHT, ALONG SAID PARALLEL 1 167.07 -- LINE, HAVING A RADIUS OF 1,829.78 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 309.67 r \ N 49'53" FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 09.°41'48"32W THENCE LEAVING SAID NOTE: s TEMPORARY CUL-DE-SAC \\ \ PARALLEL LINE, SOUTH.40°11'44" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 126.24 FEET TO TO EXPIRE UPON THE � ;O A POINT ON THE SOUTH LINE OF THE BURLINGTON NORTHERN RAILROAD � EXTENSION OF NACHES C1'• R=1629.78 RIGHT OF WAY; LEFT,AVENUE SouTHwEST THENCE ALONG A CURVE TO THE ALONG SAID SOUTH R-600.00 „ 0=09'41 48" _ ° . `) 2' 1 e=o3 za s3 L=309.67 LINE, THE CENTER OF WHICH BEARS NORTH 49 48 16 EAST HAVING A 1 L=35.76 __ADMAC^Development RADIUS OF 1,005.37 PEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 549.02 FEET THROUGH A cl- 131 CENTRAL ANGLE OF 31°17'19" TO A POINT TANGENT ON SAID SOUTH LINE O - P 1126.24 OF THE BURLINGTON NORTHERN RAILROAD RIGHT OF . WAY; .THENCE N 171.17 ,-t 540.11'44 E 1 • CONTINUING ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE, SOUTH 71°29'03" EAST ALONG A ° N 83 25W- -\ 1w�`t • aS LINE 50 FEET SOUTH OF AND PARALLEL WITH THE EXISTING SOUTHBOUND _ R=1005,37 TRACT, A DISTANCE OF 826.56 FEET TO THE WEST LINE OF SAID SECTION• O TRACT 2 5 OF va N+ 18; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE SOUTH 71°29'03" EAST, (n � / ENTON SHORELANDS� 1'i'^� - =3117.19" n 2ND SUPPLEMENTAL A DISTANCE OF 85.52 FEET TO THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTH 650 FEET 553A4 5 88'15'06'E L=549.0 2 '„ / ti 14/ / RcB53.34, :;i.`.a.�:. ;;_ . ; OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION Z.. ec14.04.12' R:8833d � > R td05:37 18; THENCE NORTH 89°10'25" WEST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID O/ nJ '� �/ �/ L_209.55 Az10 495&6 - 3 0.29!07' 00 i Co ^) 1 1 L_i65.97„ oo \\� SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF _THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 18, in / Gj /\ './ ', ::i'`+`; :°' x: ;-;:n :;°;: ,�0 9�2 DISTANCE OF 81.57 FEET TO THE EAST LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER, °� I ,1 : 'f ••'"` 8 OF SAID SECTION 13• THENCE NORTH 88 15 00 WEST ALONG THE N , r ...:..:... ,0 0 to ° * A O G ORTH In �/ 76,33 ^/ ` ``` :, „ N- QUARTER OF SAID � 93 „� • rl/ 1 3 0_�<,Y� ;;,�rz<:�;, -� �w�'��b � m;0 ���se"15'ao'� LINE OP THE SOUTH 650 FEET OF THE SOUTHEAST g CG / a , ',X t i,(." j' i : 7a42 S 7J.29 SECTION 13, A DISTANCE OF 2,261.41 FEET TO AN ANGLE POINT ON THE AS .V2 I �( �I Z.:,a-:.i.'=< ' .n-„'.e'. g- _. -S1.45'0aW • 7 \ 50'LANDSCAPE BUFFER IIn "^ = ""'`- ,.K'''':"'`"?'°' 'w � e ,- 50.00 03" qO> SOUTH BOUNDARY OF TRACT 25 OF RENTON SHORE LANDS, 1958; THENCE 3`� I$ k", 605.4e>K' N:89�is 0-6 w'- :,r<Y,.,.., I E _•N Y ... ...<,.. -.. . S1 v 154.51 N-' --_ --- ---I'vl- , ��134.17 -' 1 J f'J NORTH 33°07!25"_ '(EST ALONG SAID SOUTH BOUNDARY, "A DISTANCE OF N33'0725 W Z • 604.91 - I6.o I ,.LANDSCAPE" :740:i5. '-:8.UF ER• �`r�-- 856.35 ............... - �z 154.51 FEET TO AN ANGLE POINT; THENCE NORTH 27°21'32"__EAST ALONG l -i 7--N 88 1500 W .1 f4�T= -- 2261:41-------- Ao,o� _ SAID SOUTH BOUNDARY, A DISTANCE OF 387.32 FEET TO AN GLE POINT; 73.51 ' - 9. 1 - 1 I - roN THENCE NORTH 83'I7'25" WEST ALONG SAID SOUTH BOUNDARY, A DISTANCE N 70'S4�02 Wso ow>waGeHeN7 ...;- : . Q Q d� OF 171.17 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 46°22'22" WEST ALONG SAID SOUTH 1 IJ N 88.'15'oo'•w w �Z BOUNDARY, A DISTANCE OF 324.66 FEET, THENCE SOUTH 72°37'S2" WEST 5 87.2 -KC.A.S. - - ---- x ---= - w - - - 118_ ,,,; i� a 3 -- ALONG SAID SOUTH BOUNDARY, DISTANCE6. _ n .: 24 19 _- . POINT OF=BEGINNING. Y A OF 7 33 FEET TO THE TRUE • 4,.-, . _ i -- �Me�1T -©- [-1 V. I -�1 Architecture and Planning - _ _ _ __ �._. .. . _ JO�-�®: .2 � TAI NO. • BlackRiver-Corporate Park SATE:_-__ - 27•-8‘ •_.! ADMAC Building .. : BUI' 11 - . - DRAWN A r?oNlug �P . Leason Pomeroy Northwest,Inc:,Royce.A.Berg A IrA.,114 Vine Street(2nd&Vine)Seattle,WA 98121(206)624-5771 ' " Rent®n Washington: �HEC�c _- • , • • L flL b Glalp�('(atl . • • ' THAT PORTION OF TRACT 25, RENTON SHORELANDS 2ND SUPPLEMENTAL; AND THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 23, - NORTH, • 'RANGE 4 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, - WASHINGTON, AND THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 13, AND THE! SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTH QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 13; THENCE • . NORTH 00°58'28" EAST ALONG THE NORTH - SOUTH CENTERLINE OF SAID SECTION 13, A DISTANCE OF 884.84 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF TRACT 26 OF RENTON SHORELANDS SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL MAPS, 1958, AND THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 72'37'52" WEST ALONG . THE SOUTH BOUNDARY OF SAID TRACT 26, A DISTANCE OF 382.60 FEET; THENCE NORTH 70°54'02" WEST ALONG THE SOUTH BOUNDARY OF SAID • • � ` - TRACT 26, A DISTANCE OF 73.51 FEET TO THE EAST LINE OF THE r N • CHARLES BROWNELL DONATION LAND CLAIM NO. 41; THENCE NORTH _ 01'24'04" EAST ALONG SAID EAST LINE, A DISTANCE OF 950.58 FEET TO Li w • A LINE 35 FEET SOUTHERLY OF AND PARALLEL WITH THE CENTERLINE OF ,nla . - ' - THE EXISTING MOST SOUTHERLY TRACK OF THE CHICAGO, MILWAUKEE, ST.' •, al' • - - PAUL AND PACIFIC RAILROAD TRACKS; THENCE ALONG SAID LINE 35 .FEET • 31w V - • - SOUTHERLY OF AND PARALLEL WITH THE CENTERLINE OF THE MOST ' N . - • - SOUTHERLY TRACK, ALONG A CURVE TO THE RIGHT, THE CENTER OF WHICH ' BEARS SOUTH 15'22'32" EAST, HAVING A RADIUS OF 2,790.19 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 659.24 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 13°32'14" R=1102.4b• TO A POINT OF COMPOUND CURVE; THENCE ALONG A CURVE TO THE RIGHT,=13°32 14 ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE, THE CENTER OF WHICH BEARS SOUTH ' nlg01'150'18" EAST HAVING A RADIUS OF Rt:t-'L 65TANCE 1 9.24 �_8071 d'�g7s - OF°807.11 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 641°56'46"; THENC FEET, AN ARC E SOUTH, 6 - 49 53 32 EAST, ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE, A DISTANCE OF 167.07 g �6`., FEET; THENCE ALONG A CURVE TO THE RIGHT, ALONG SAID PARALLEL, + 167.07 - - -- LINE, HAVING A RADIUS OF 1,829.78 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 309.67 NOTE \ N49"53"32•W FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 09.°41'48"; THENCE LEAVING SAID ' PARALLEL LINE, SOUTH 40°11'44" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 126.24 FEET TO' TEMPORARY CUL-DE-SAC \ \ A POINT ON THE SOUTH LINE OF THE BURLINGTON NORTHERN RAILROAD TO EXPIRE UPON THE .. �0 EXTENSION OF NACHES } "Cs R=1829.78 • RIGHT OF WAY; THENCE ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT, ALONG SAID SOUTH AVENUE SOUTHWEST j L\=09'41'48" R_600.00 LINE, THE CENTER OF WHICH BEARS NORTH 49°48'16" EAST HAVING AI LOT ��• e=03•za 53 L=309.67 _ADMAC Development L=35.76 RADIUS OF 1,005.37 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 549.02 FEET THROUGH A 1131 CENTRAL ANGLE OF 31.17'19' TO A POINT TANGENT ON SAID .SOUTH LINE O 1Q,i'lr\ 126.24 OF THE BURLINGTON NORTHERN RAILROAD RIGHT OF - WAY; ..THENCE N 171.17 1 1 540'11`44 E CONTINUING ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE, SOUTH 71'29'03" EAST ALONG A N 832517/� �� 1w,�1 �\ - LINE 50 FEET SOUTH OF AND PARALLEL WITH THE EXISTING SOUTHBOUND O W s, R=1005,37_ • TRACT, A DISTANCE OF 826.56 FEET TO THE WEST LINE OF SAID SECTION ' TRACT 25 OF QN� •A=31'17.1g 18; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE SOUTH 71°29'03" EAST, :� Ass SHORELANDS� Lens • A DISTANCE OF 85.52 FEET TO THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTH 650 FEET... (Q 2ND SUPPLEMENTAL ' d 553A4 S86.15.06'E L=549.02 \ ,ml �O n`� ;-; ,::;.. .. - OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION' 'QI �ti�` •� A.14.04.12' R•:883.34 ,"; ;:`.; f�, ' ..,Rri005,3T • 18; THENCE NORTH 89°10'25" WEST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID nj °9" pj/ L_209.55 1 I L11605,.975 ,;y »:.` '::' fr-O24'O7 CO �� �� / -:r ; . oL=:852> 3 SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF _THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 18, A ^• �/ id w3 No 9;12 DISTANCE OF 81.57 FEET TO THE EAST LINE OP THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER Ci 0) I\ i "4 j 0 T t. g . 08 -` N OF SAID SECTION 13; THENCE NORTH 88°15'00" WEST ALONG THE NORTH if) ��/ 9 76,33 • 13•• ,,'.', :",`^. w��� ,Ct N SS8°1s'oo� LINE OF THE SOUTH 650 FEET OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID A63. 2'� ` :,•..'':;, ,.,. ,SV/`Y' q, Y u,!r v�j i�•• 7na2 S ?/� • O SECTION 13, A DISTANCE OP 2,261.41 FEET TO AN ANGLE POINT ON THE, 5 ,r --51.45'00 w 29' r 50'LAND SCAPE BUFFER INI`n I` r `' " so.00 3 �O> SOUTH BOUNDARY OF TRACT 25 OF RENTON SHORE LANDS, ' 1958; THENCE 2 3 �� �`" 60S,9B ..,`N'88`15 UO W.,;`.,�'<,. � 34.17 - A r ^1 - •� r •w�--•,,...•: =•. -_ ' '- -'- - -- _:.. . .y.-. .y Si m 154.51 �- --�-- --'----FIB p �. :. -/ J 1 J . _ -, r NORTH 33 07!25".. WEST ALONG SAID SOUTH BOUNDARY, A DISTANCE OF - 604.91 - 6'O' tl LAN U.S.0 A PE .740:1.5�`.'.:BiJFFER1_ __ - �z: ' w a1 N33'0725W m k1_ _ _ 856.35 -- 154.51 FEET TO AN ANGLE POINT; THENCE NORTH 27°21 32 _EAST ALONG L -N 88 1500 W --.4 4cr-I---2261;41------ -_-- 4 SAID SOUTH BOUNDARY, A DISTANCE OF 387.32 FEET TO AN ANGLE POINT; • 73.51. '�-. -.,- -= ' w I 30I DRAWL e EA MBNT.- �laoor- ,^ • THENCE NORTH 83°17'25" WEST ALONG SAID SOUTH BOUNDARY, A DISTANCE N70°54'02 W1 I ¢' 1 1 0 OF 171.17 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 46'22'22" WEST ALONG SAID SOUTH 1 i3 N 8ais'00"W w • �Z "'='` BOUNDARY A DISTANCE OF 324.66 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 72°37'52' WEST cif a - 3 �` _, ALONG SAID SOUTH BOUNDARY, A DISTANCE OF 76.33 FEET TO THE TRUE z a ^n, i - 19•? • I POINT OF BEGINNING. Architecture and Planning ? JOB.-��: ~-�°�U 8 7 1 N:j.r1140 E AIL O. r BlackRiver Corporate Park . SATE:___. .- ° 7 6 i. - •.,. • j • ADMAC Buildin 9 : - DRAWN. "�: ' • = _UILDIN / ZONING ..DflT. Lemon Porneroy,Northwest,Inc:,Royce•A Berg AI.A.,114-VinO Street(2nd&Vine)Seattle,WA 98121(206)624-5771 Renton, Washington. CHECK.. . _- ' . . ( , ' . • • I . •. . . . •"e.',.: •:. . • ... ; . .?....... • % ' 1.'.!,,' - • ‘Li,ssiel.„, . - •'' ' :7- r 484a;'. I *IP.- : L'1111- 111.: % . ' ' ' . • Ike ..''''' • ‘‘-'MM. "tiViViri, ' / . . . . ,- . . • 1 4 • -I 1 • r- -"Lc;.,-. .--1.„ ... or-":•.."1. .i '. • .4teti. Niikk' , ' citNfr.'5.0 ii. ., el,..,_ .. ..... - % .1;z4-'...1,......:37;.,--44-24.*A-7, -kt.---7i- .r---,,,' - ''''''Z'l. •••• - - ' SITE , -.... .;,,•-•- -..,‘ 7,..,-,_, 4k.--e-i-1, ..f.77r.,.1 :-Trs ifeliail. tir, . ,i 1111 .._.4.L, . .„ ..r• • Y;----r7-7---1-4---,...4,,,, lk. *k1.1".' Ali...-t‘'I ,T,'T..4--;•,-`4‘ I-C.* 4-11,--i-.:.;...7,-'.."--.. ..T/,•1./.41 _.•-• f. ,4 Lc.it'%•Z-t".•-r its-'S.7-,- k. •-•trrr7r•irr'-' ..4.:;4•"-t---`.:., ..'-t•r""f -4. Cf. , .., ,... *.1:4'.--' -,', 'III,.''•II--:111:1 / • ...:, F F,, ..'- ..,:s_., e.-.,:,.`".4 .,..-,',-,1e; 7, .., 4 .,-;_-•' "4:, r••:•,,,..._er.A--••••4?..,. ....‘'11,....„t`,... %....,.;•tt, ' i t."-r--1 . • • ‘ ......rf"; --"=-- ". -1 41`. .---w-f•;-,' -1-r., ,„ ''''''`..:: y", ---:•''' ",-,'A -,r-- • •- ---:ri ••' ''t ..• „0„- , -.-.:,`-',1,7--;-- ., -, ,!4,,•,4. .-- •'17.,-..--.:4... .,•-,,... --,*%--r?..„_---- '-:,,-.1,-„.„4„f'%{"-.rt',„„$;•.<2.*:%,--S-ir•,.ez_i;iz,r1...--': .. '; • I. ? t , ,„:....•!,•• . ,...,. -.. , ,e..,..g. 1,...-...-.,‘... -7.-„0..,:-...„,....- ...- •-•,-,-4:1•3rA'-''.- .:',`-',.,.. ...._ e • . 1 ' A-t-s- . .-',-.'-•-•:::.---..5-z's ; .,,...-1-..'--- -,...-71:;.,,,-.-`',Ire'' -.........j. ' '-'1,•-' 1. -1:..,-,---ve;...-- - --`-4r -''''..1"!7 ,r1' - • ." ...--`,,,r.,....!.....&..4L.,....-- - -...--' -;:r.'--- , .:- hi .. _ 1 F.". . . 4 . .. ,tV F.;-,1, , .4' ''.`-? 'r. : • 1.,,.'":, ."...„ .?",-' •• _ -7i '-i "•-•-•-•.:i1,:-,-.1 .--; ''',.. -..f--- '• V--".Ici,it `-1,111111 ; -7 r '-' - i•••-=-N. • 't •'. . I ..i. • „.,,- -,.:- ...fr:t.,,s.. 11---'./. "t4,4 t'., f a. . f"--:--;srm. - ' ' - - ' .0 ••.' r. --'-'• r• .1111. - ff..; ->:!••..trf••••• '..-„,. ..,...„(5 -- \.; .3-:,'',-;.,;,. .- `..-.r. -• '.. --,----'""-:. '3-1-5. --.--- . ..47,64r *-_/. it,..,, - •••• --..:.: -r. '.-!...A.,:----.:-•\ ' si•if.- -,"......,' ,-,---.•-•'`•••."• **:-t; - ---- 77'"'"••';'*-- -'."•- i'-'•'• - ,,," -,., -'--4_ '''-' -: \- .%— . - ' ^=I'41,11' -,fr....a- '''''r:::''' ..7..... 1 .'4'' I."••,:i • -:k -': -- 7...7:-.4..-'"'''''.-4r"-.':-.-=-1---=2".--V1.Z7,:ve". - .. 7.,, (..:? 4: lz.,.... ..- .„.--..--.„- •,•Idik. ' .•"' .. .r.'.V.:,:r..,.!'f--,.';;A.,.. ..-.i:..,...,.,.. 7:. ---=‘-'-= --L'-'12:` .•-- - .--:-..... .--;...4'"-t.--"IS.T;--,- ---.4:-:1?-. %----""---. - •',.. .-- ,'- 77- 1. . . - ,.(.,;•- - --1 ,'-.:-...-----3t-..-. ,, .:-:-.,..:-----...vi.....-.-...._..-.._.-;-,,i-:- .r-.c.' ', .' -. .''' •--- •.''''''',"41.1-".t.---'-•'67'-'''' • --• ---1 -'ij. -.' .1, f 40 . • • ' . _.,(Ls- ,,.At• ._vi-j:::;;-, 1 I ri_Ji.Fi.1. -7--tr.--. ..._..:,;,.•:...e..-,..s..- ; ,.-'.---_-__:T-7.17-7:-..-,` • " P, - ---." , Ns-. '`:.,-,,-.-1,-,-4 i.- : '-'-f•''' 141.', -• ---. --,....- i ,T •(i WIP.....--."- - -- - _ - ...„,-.72) ..-„,.., ...--- - ,...,..,,, ..: ..,-.- ,..--- .--,,...., , .-,.,-....,_,._',--.,,,-,.•,,,- °,_-_--,-..,.. . :.. . , ,,,,,, ,- .. r!...,f.•,,r,-;,..•-•.qi., . . ,i'../...- . ., 1 7.;•`, .a.,:. _ -' -' •-. / -- - - - - ... ,,...*.f,, ,F:',.,..-_ „,._,... .,.4.-,. ..?_-=7:, -...ilt.,.-T-:ti',--..,!:: . b..._ ...-.' .:--'''''''',e-_,!..„''';',..,._14.;•'„.--,-.. '''- ,, ,-f•: •.f/'• . -rt.-ff.:14g- :I.. ' 1'•' ' . -. . 1Iii.- ; '-' : .W.• ' -:.:-Z ,' 7.. 1 .' 0111Aolliii.',. "'IL'7 ..-- • - ' . / - `. ,!,. ..L • "i- \ ,4i, "% ,-:,. 1.;,...,--, ,- -?"-,i.„..,:-.• ' , t,:•4:.:1'"":. .„1„.. ,i,'''-'4.,,,:*:,..t-.2..7 711111,. . .5" ,./ '.`•..' Ji #,,, ' ....-.. ' :f ..,' .-,• ! # .....e. ,...• • ••,.. .-,:,-...:•rni, VI • S 4 )".-• --r.' 4 . - - :trf,if•/- 4'.'- • , .r..; •• • s' ' I ‘ ' ' L te,--.,.t.' ••'''''''. -...... .......--... --..-'7.......-4, . *•:-.1,* . • .1-., • 5'Cr' .... 1. . . N% ; - I ---,— - at... ‘k.N. N.„..." I .; .:'--., " ....;',' ..../.:'.1/. ."'/"‘ ,'7 ,4.1(k. kl-i V __. ,---'--111, , • -'" - - ,'. '••• v•.- il , ,, . . •I'L,.‘,. ' i':7 '-'.:.' " - • gl.- .'.. sip 4N ,.... il. , • •• .- •-* ' - 44 -, -, \ ....- • ). —._,.-- .. . k. " : 1-; '-:':-4 1 -I - # , 7th '111.111 .e.--...'--- '..\ 1.4611:HaLas.— .;.- 'I A:41.._--,1••_. -.. . ,„„..--. . .,-- . ____:, --..,.= • . :.--... -----....„. itilb . ..__ ,,,;,.:„.„•._ - , ,_$.-• „...# I t . I -.,„.., ,.::. ..... , „, .... . i . , !. • - ,. ,„,i.,,,,..., „ ..,.... ,....- ..ka,,,...:..,..,,-,-....:„.. .. ,. --,...,:...... Aka- - , ••,, 'rli '' 3. ' - I . .....-•:r1:'._-1",..,.!1(•:'..7.,-.. \r`‘cv. ! or.. ..:-••'"..:,,',.,,i. ; ,__... F-11 • • - 1 , r ; Powell Ave. .; •,..:: ••,,,--__-... .•. . , •ii _ ,., i. r, : . , . .___. ‘ , _ . _••. ,:•...„.. 1 .,.• _:,:: .• --- -, i , . t . ; ..„. • :Conceptual Master Plan ,.....,...____ 1,. -L._ t s., . • :. ',.. .1'..:1' .-.: -1:1-:-. '::.-.;:',,\ t.-," • I.` ': '1 :. -I• ,-,_ 4--',.: .1. • 7 .i--;,---‘ .-'''. . -!;.' • • . . .. ...- -- • . .. .... --..—--• BlackRiver „ . . . - • . i - ..I.. . - 1.... ‘• `: .,Ilipli t 1 4 1,'1; Corporate Park , • -.. . ,: .,. A .-- - •• 11 .' ; Li! . • - • . . . ..,.. t - . • , • . • VALLEY 405 --.... A.t... k . _. . ,. ., - , .. - ......---, . . , .-----, • -/•.RENTON,,A-• WASHINGTON 7 - •.,.,-,-'-.'. \3.,..V-,'... .'-'''•',-If,'-I-• A- I•I- f• • ,. . - ,.V.- 'F,,'4_t..2,,,'•.,,.-,--,:.',,,....-•-,-,.-.! '• . ,- .,.3/ „....... ti_.0.Dia. f scALe t ..... \:: ..-.0,-. ••• . .._;.% ...! --. ' •: 1 , FIRST ciTy EOUITIES, :•' \ -IN ORTHWEST . 1 .--f': 1. ' Grady Way -- - 1.i 4 .-,, -_ .•. LEASON POMEROY t ......-.... , MITCHELL NELSON CROUP ' CITY OF RENTON _ . ..,.. -s,..,-,..:-, .;- . or',„ . , •- - .-- 1CIDVIE] ... . .... . 7 JUN 2 1986 ...,.... , . --• .... .... „ I ." . • ...... 40, . , . .4 .. _ --- .iiiammialasiimmoneg ..• ". ... .. :. - "".." ., .. BUILDING / ZONING DEPT. . . i • sullamilii . . • . ,. ... ..... __ - .,- -. ...N .. - -. L 1..4. 'i. ' NTEROFF I CE ME 0 TO:;,- CAN DATE: cf'-U 21 A 161. � k FROM: SUBJECT: Mv., Ix N'PrC SA-- _, °--1401---- "VD oN.s...._a_e_h____, Ta . V\Nt:)----a-r- Pk-,---- rr--211<-__. / b.- • ) :� / 7---q' / 4/ if,...,„ , , // ,i,(1 Ir 0- - ii,, 7,-,-..,.,, ,fr,E,,,,,f,„/ipin ,,,o,:f-,--- ArA/../Nit/ ixtthrit.,,/,',\I /A, . , .. ,.." " , ,,,,, ,--,- -7- i �r Eg,- /-tom- ��' , �� t' c d° Rra 1 /�Y)b/� ��47,gtt4-` . 1 14/ atYyqNam^ /t/ 1 -di/ 1' �!`r/,7 d/� p ,L--. . • LAW OFFICES OF ALSTON, COURTNAGE, MACAULAY & PROCTOR SUITE 3900 • 1000 SECOND AVENUE THADDAS L.ALSTON TELEPHONE SEATTLE,WASHINGTON 98104-1054 MICHAEL S.COURTNAGE (2o6)623-76o0 ROBERT C.MacAULAY TELEX CONSTANCE L.PROCTOR 474o125 SEA UI ANDREW B.BASSETTI TELECOPIER (zo6)623-1752 1001/77 May 12, 1987 CaT.i OF 1'7E: T 0NN rr 1 b. 1••\ Mr. Don Erickson ' Mr 'f' 1 "i9t7 Building and Zoning Department City of Renton Municipal Building Lea EV. / .70NUM 200 Mill Avenue S. Renton, Washington 98055 Re: First City Equities - City File No. SA-057-86 Dear Don: We spoke last week with regard to the above referenced matter and you were going to check the file and respond to me. As I have not heard back from you, I am enclosing a copy of my letter to Larry Warren, the enclosure and Larry' s reply. I would appreciate a response. Very truly yours, A STON, COURTNAGE, acAULAY & PROCTOR Michael S. r age encl. cc: Ms. Barbara Moss crs f L._ .) di CITY OF RENTON t$ ® Lawrence J. Warren, (:,'e0atk' oriLL Daniel KelloggDavid M. Dean-Mark E. Barber -Zanetta L. Fonte�jy� d�f� 7Parr Ass�Faki't'tty� brneys April 24, 1987 ALSTON,CCU pY AGE& II 1 I Mr. Michael S. Courtnage ot;. . Alston, Courtnage, MacAulay & Proctor Suite 3900, 1000 Second Avenue Seattle, WA 98104-1054 __________ Re: City of Renton - First City Equities City File No. SA-057-86 Dear Mr. Courtnage: I am in receipt of your letter of April 16, 1987. I do 'recall seeing a copy of the Agreement that you reference in your 1 .;,,,- letter . I made comments on that that I believe are in the r,,,, ..ii5 nature of attorney-client communications . I then forwarded Vve,k,i4,4., those comments to the decision maker at the City for follow up. i{-i. - The decision maker may decide to ignore my advice or may have L"`' additional comments. If you wish to resolve the problem with '' . • the Agreement, I would suggest you contact the City of Renton directly. I believe that the appropriate department to contact is the Building and Zoning Department. Their phone number is 235-2540. Ve tru y yours, a. Lawrenc J. Wa-r-r-en_____ L JW/j w -- --- - - --- - cc: Mayor Shinpoch TO D j TI 4J M J8. 2: 47 P Doo ' ' PM FROM ARE Cdd DE O. =O. .OF ' lX N Od . i EXT. E viirc '4' 41 ' E `✓ ,T pfiffieliM s i M 1. �1.,.i _ / 0 G . - E a AgC� j NALeANPAP/0441-71O " ESIGNED i • El I PHONED, BACK CALL I D SEEYOUWANTSTO AGAIN ALL wASIN URGENT Post Office Box 626 - 100 S 2nd Street - Renton, Washington 98057 - (206) 255-8678 AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT entered into as of this day of December, 1986 between FIRST CITY DEVELOPMENTS CORP. , a Washington corporation, as nominee ("Owner") and the CITY OF RENTON, Washington, a Municipal Corporation ("City") . RECITALS A. Owner is the owner of the real property described in Exhibit 1 hereto (the "Property") B. Owner has applied for a Site Plan approval with respect to a portion of the Property under City File Numbers SA-057-86 and V-058-86 (the "Applications") . C. The City's hearing examiner has recommended approval of the Applications, subject to certain conditions, including the Owner's execution of an agreement with the City placing certain restrictions with respect to a sixty (60) foot wide strip through the property. D. Owner is willing to enter into an agreement with the City to restrict such portion of the Property. NOW, THEREFORE,the parties covenant and agree as follows: 1. Owner agrees that it will not construct buildings or other structures within the sixty (60) foot wide section of the Property described in Exhibit 2 (the "Restricted Property") and that it will set aside and reserve the Restricted Property for Owner's ultimate construction thereon of a thirty six (36) foot wide roadway with twenty-four (24) feet of right-of-way meeting City standard and the dedication thereof to the City. 2 . Owner and City agree that the current description of the Restricted Property represents the parties current best estimate of the desired location for the roadway extension. The Restricted Property may be relocated by mutual agreement of the parties as reflected in an amendment to this Agreement. 3. Owner further agrees that it will join in participating in area-wide traffic improvements not to exceed those contained in the Transportation Improvement Analysis for Black River Technical Park, dated June, 1986, prepared by The Transpo Group. (12/4/86) -1- f 4. The City acknowledges that this Agreement satisfies conditions 1 and 2 of the 'hearing examiners report on the Application, dated August 13, 1986. 5. The agreements contained herein shall run with the Property and be binding upon all parties having or acquiring any right, title or interest in the Property or any part thereof, unless released in writing by the parties. This Agreement can be amended by mutual agreement of the parties as reflected in a written amendment hereto. FIRST CITY DEVELOPMENTS CORP. ("OWNER") By Its By Its Accepted By: CITY OF RENTON ("City") By Attest: City Clerk -2- LAW OFFICES OF ALSTON, COURTNAGE, MACAULAY & PROCTOR SUITE 3450 • FIRST INTERSTATE CENTER TELEPHONE 999 THIRD AVENUE (206)623.7600 THADDAS L.ALSTON TELEX MICHAEL S.COURTNAGE SEATTLE,WASHINGTON 98104-4001 4740125 SEA UI ROBERT C.MAcAULAY TELECOPIER CONSTANCE L.PROCTOR (206)623.1752 ANDREW B.BASSETTI April 16, 1987 Lawrence J. Warren, Esq. 1007/77 P.O. Box 626 Renton, Washington 98057 Re: City of Renton - First City Equities - City File No. SA-057-86 Dear Larry: I am enclosing a copy of an Agreement which First City Equities believed was responsive to the City' s requirements on the -above-referenced matter, but apparently there is some problem in this regard. I would appreciate it if you would call me so that we can discuss the problem and make arrangements for its resolution. Thank you for your cooperation. Very truly yours, A TON, COURTNAGE, lacAULAY & PROCTOR / Mic f S. Court age? MSC:gn Enclosure cc: Ms. Barbara Moss OF R�� A^A "Pr.:"z'-. BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT Z RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR 09 a ^ MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 © 235-2540 0 SEP� �4P BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR April 24, 1987 Ms. Barbara Moss First City Equities 800 Fifth Avenue Suite 4170 Seattle, WA 98104 Subject: Blackriver Technology Park, Agreement to Develop a Benefit Assessment District Dear Barbara: The City of Renton and First City Equities have agreed to join forces to begin the initial steps necessary to establish a transportation benefit-assessment district for the S/SW Grady Way Corridor, an area bordered by the Burlington-Northern Railway (Old Milwaukee Line) along the North, the Union Pacific Railway on the West and Interstate 405 on the South and East (the "Corridor"). The purpose of the District is to identify necessary transportation improvements to alleviate current traffic congestion, accommodate future development and to establish a funding mechanism to fund such improvements. To accomplish these objectives, First City Equities has retained the TRANSPO Group (the "Consultant") to perform the scope of work identified in Consultant's (Jeffrey Webber's) letter to Barbara Moss of February 2, 1987, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit 1 (the "Study"). The estimated cost of the Study is $27,760.00. The anticipated completion date of the Study is June 1987. The City of Renton agrees that the Study encompasses the complete scope necessary to accomplish the parties' objectives. The City of Renton agrees to cooperate with the Consultant to provide necessary information for the Study that is only available from the City, including, but not limited to, the following: Ms. Barbara Moss Blackriver Technology Park Agreement to Develop a Benefit Assessment District April 24, 1987 Page 2 1. Software and documentation to the City's enhanced T-model traffic model together with files describing networks and trip tables as necessary to support this modeling effort. 2. Data on existing and potential land use development in the Study area. Data will include number of housing units and square feet of non-residential development by general categories (retail, industrial, office). The City's "full development" scenario will be assumed as the potential for the area. 3. List of TSM policies and measures to be assumed for future trip generation estimates in the study area. A preliminary list will be proposed by Consultant. 4. List of additional transportation improvements to be assumed for future "full development" scenario. This should include regional improvements that might affect traffic by volumes in the study area. A preliminary listing will be proposed by Consultant. Both parties have agreed that the fees paid to the Consultant for the Study, including any additional charges resulting from agreed changes in the Study, will be deducted from or credited against traffic mitigation payments and assessments due from First City Equities for Black River Technology Park. This Study, which is to identify necessary transportation improvements to alleviate current traffic congestion, and accommodate future development, is not seen as having any impact on the recommendations or validity of the Traffic Impact Analysis for Black River Technology Park completed in June, 1986. Any changes in the proposed development program for Black River Technology Park could, if warranted, require amendments to this study but would not be dependent on the results of the proposed Regional Traffic Analysis for Black River Corporate Park. Until the said study is completed the City will require First City Equities to bond an anticipated "fair share assessment" of necessary transportation improvements based on the pro rata share of the area of Black River Technology Park covered by development for which the permit is sought. The City agrees that the cost of the study will be included within the transportation improvements costs and that those transportation improvements for the Corridor will be equitably allocated between the City and the land owners within the Corridor and that a funding mechanism and cost assessment methodology for such improvements will be determined by agreement among the City of Renton and First City and the other land owners within the Corridor. Ms. Barbara Moss Blackriver Technology Park Agreement to Develop a Benefit Assessment District April 24, 1987 Page 3 Please indicate your approval of this agreement by signing in the space provided below. CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE 71 t?oYiald Nelson Richard Houghton 7 1 .4er ' Agreed: FIRST CITY EQUITIES By Dated , 1987 �► { CITY OF RENTON Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney - ,. Daniel Kellogg - David M. Dean - Mark E. Barber - Zanetta L. Fontes -Theodore R. Parry Assistant City Attorneys March 23 , 1987 TO: Ron Nelson, Building and Zoning Director FROM: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney RE: First City Equities Dear Ron: I received a copy of the proposed Agreement between the City and First City Equities to implement conditions No. 1 and 2 of Site Plan Approval No. SA-057-86 . I have the following comments: 1 . There is no necessity for the City to enter into any agreement. The developer is to prepare the necessary restrictive convenants . I do not like paragraph 5 which says that the agreement shall be binding on all parties . That is the reason why I do not want the City to be a party to any agreement. 2 . The Hearing Examiner ' s Decision requires a reservation of 80 feet. The agreement reserves 60 feet . I have also reviewed the agreement to develop a benefit assessment district. I am bothered that the agreement gives control of the study to the developer ' s consultant and I wonder how the City can exert any control over that type of study. What happens if the City does not like the study results? The City needs to make sure that there is some method for it to have equal control over the study and some way to disavow the results if they are clearly not in the City' s best interest. The way the agreement is drafted, we are agreeing to accept the study results before we have obtained them. It is hard to understand how that will mitigate environmental impacts if we do not know how they are to be mitigated. Lawrence . Warren LJW:nd cc: Mayor Post Office Box 626 - 100 S 2nd Street - Renton, Washington 98057 - (206) 255-8678 Girt' C,= F:N T G",l MAR 131987 AGREEMENT 13Ull_DING/7oNING DEPT. THIS AGREEMENT entered into as of this 8th day of December, 1986 between FIRST CITY DEVELOPMENTS CORP. , a Washington corporation, as nominee ("Owner") and the CITY OF RENTON, Washington, a Municipal Corporation ("City") . RECITALS A. Owner is the owner of the real property described in Exhibit 1 hereto (the "Property") B. Owner has applied for a Site Plan approval with respect to a portion of the Property under City File Numbers SA-057-86 and V-058-86 (the "Applications") . C. The City's hearing examiner has recommended approval of the Applications, subject to certain conditions, including the Owner's execution of an agreement with the City placing certain restrictions with respect to a sixty (60) foot wide strip through the property. D. Owner is willing to enter into an agreement with the City to restrict such portion of the Property. NOW, THEREFORE,the parties covenant and agree as follows: 1. Owner agrees that it will not construct buildings or other structures within the sixty (60) foot wide section of Ur the Property described in Exhibit 2 (the "Restricted Property") and that it will set aside and reserve the Restricted Property for Owner's ultimate construction thereon of a thirty six (36) foot wide roadway with twenty-four (24) feet of right-of-way meeting City standard and the dedication thereof to the City. 2. Owner and City agree that the current description of the Restricted Property represents the parties current best ��, estimate of the ,desired location for the roadway ,extension. The Restricted- Property may be relocated by mutual agreement of the parties as reflected in an amendment to this Agreement. 3 . Owner further .agrees that it will join in participating in area-wide traffic improvements not to exceed yam those contained in the Transportation Improvement Analysis for® Black River Technical Park, dated June, 1986, prepared by The Transpo Group. (12/4/86) -1- 4. The City acknowledges that this Agreement satisfies conditions 1 and 2 of the hearing examiners report on the Application, dated August 13, 1986. 5. The agreements contained herein shall run with the Property and be binding upon all parties having or acquiring any right, title or interest in the Property or any part thereof, unless released in writing by the parties. This Agreement can be amended by mutual agreement of the parties as reflected in a written amendment hereto. FIRST CITY DEVELOPMENTS CORP. ("OWNER") 7 By Its By Its Accepted By: CITY OF RENTON ("City") By Attest: City Clerk -2- D UY oA2, EXHIBIT #1 PARCEL A: THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; AND THAT PORTION OF JUNCTION ADDITION TO THE CITY OF SEATTLE, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 12 OF PLATS, PAGE. .7.5..,.. IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; TOGETHER WITH VACATED STREETS ADJOINING WHICH WOULD ATTACH TO SAID PREMISES BY OPERATION OF LAW; AND OF C.E. BROWNELL'S DONATION CLAIM NO. 41 AND OF THAT PORTION OF TRACT 26, RENTON SHORELANDS 2ND SUPPLEMENTAL, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTH QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 13; THENCE NORTH 00°58128" EAST ALONG THE NORTH - SOUTH CENTERLINE OF SAID SECTION 13 A DISTANCE OF 884 .84 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF TRACT 26 OF RENTON SHORELANDS SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL MAPS, 1958; THENCE SOUTH 72°37 ' 52" WEST ALONG THE SOUTH BOUNDARY OF SAID TRACT 26 A DISTANCE OF 382.60 FEET; THENCE NORTH 70°54 ' 02" WEST ALONG SAID SOUTH BOUNDARY OF TRACT 26 A DISTANCE OF 73.50 FEET TO THE EAST LINE OF THE CHARLES BROWNELL DONATION LAND CLAIM NO. 41 AND THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING NORTH 70°54 ' 02" WEST ALONG SAID SOUTH BOUNDARY OF TRACT 26 A DISTANCE OF 281.02 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 73°56 ' O1" WEST ALONG SAID SOUTH BOUNDARY OF TRACT 26 A DISTANCE OF 130 . 08 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 41°6' 07" WEST ALONG SAID SOUTH BOUNDARY OF TRACT 26 A DISTANCE OF 316.18-. FEET TO THE NORTH BOUNDARY OF A TRACT OF LAND DEEDED TO KING COUNTY AND DESCRIBED UNDER KING COUNTY RECORDING NUMBER 6607786; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG SAID NORTH BOUNDARY ON A CURVE TO THE LEFT, THE CENTER OF WHICH BEARS SOUTH 39°41'39" WEST HAVING A RADIUS OF 627.46 FEET AN ARC DISTANCE OF 434.70 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 39 °41139"; THENCE NORTH A DISTANCE OF 25.00 FEET ALONG SAID NORTH BOUNDARY; THENCE WEST A DISTANCE OF 280.69 FEET ALONG• SAID NORTH BOUNDARY; THENCE SOUTH 59°53 ' 47" WEST ALONG SAID NORTH BOUNDARY DISTANCE OF 377.52 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 74°13'19" WEST ALONG SAID NORTH BOUNDARY A DISTANCE OF 443.31 FEET TO THE NORTHERLY MARGIN OF THE CHARLES MONSTER COUNTY ROAD, THENCE NORTH 34°18' 31" WEST ALONG SAID NORTHERLY MARGIN A DISTANCE OF 43.46 FEET TO THE SOUTH LINE OF THE BURLINGTON • NORTHERN RAILROAD RIGHT OF WAY; THENCE ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT, ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE, THE CENTER OF WHICH BEARS NORTH 0-6°34 ' 41" WEST HAVING A RADIUS OF 696.00 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 45.43 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 03°44 '25" TO A POINT OF COMPOUND CURVE; THENCE ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT, ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE, THE CENTER OF WHICH BEARS NORTH 10°19 ' 06" WEST HAVING A RADIUS OF 1,055.00 FEET AN ARC DISTANCE OF 209.95 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 11°24 ' 08" TO A POINT OF COMPOUND CURVE; THENCE ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT, ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE, THE CENTER OF WHICH BEARS NORTH 21°43'14" WEST HAVING A RADIUS OF 727.00 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 214.77 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 16°55' 35" TO A POINT OF COMPOUND CURVE; THENCE ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT, ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE,THE CENTER OF WHICH BEARS NORTH 38 °38'49" WEST HAVING A RADIUS OF 1,571.00 FEET AN ARC DISTANCE OF 206.57 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 07°32'02" TO A POINT OF TANGENCY; THENCE NORTH 43°49'09" EAST ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE A DISTANCE OF 97.17 FEET TO A LINE 35 FEET SOUTHERLY OF AND PARALLEL WITH THE CENTERLINE OF THE EXISTING MOST SOUTHERLY TRACK OF THE CHICAGO, MILWAUKEE, ST. PAUL AND PACIFIC RAILROAD TRACKS; THENCE ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE ON A CURVE TO THE RIGHT, THE CENTER OF WHICH BEARS SOUTH 42°43'18" EAST HAVING A RADIUS OF 696.89 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 4 0.09""FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 03°17'45"; THENCE NORTH 50°34'27" EAST ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE A DISTANCE OF 248.50 FEET; THENCE ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE ON A CURVE TO THE RIGHT, THE CENTER OF WHICH BEARS SOUTH 39 °25'33" EAST HAVING A RADIUS OF 676.58 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 93.64 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 07 °55'47" TO A POINT OF REVERSE CURVE; THENCE ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE ON A CURVE TO THE LEFT, THE CENTER OF WHICH BEARS NORTH 31°29'46" WEST HAVING A RADIUS OF 428.64 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 73.32 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 09°48'04" TO -A POINT OF REVERSE CURVE; THENCE ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE ON A CURVE TO THE RIGHT, THE CENTER OF WHICH BEARS SOUTH 41°17'50" EAST HAVING A RADIUS OF 2,580.74 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 437.40 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 09°42'39" TO A POINT OF COMPOUND CURVE; THENCE ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE ON A CURVE TO THE RIGHT, THE CENTER OF WHICH BEARS SOUTH 31°35'11" EAST HAVING A RADIUS OF 2,790.19 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 789.44 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 16°12'39" TO THE EAST LINE OF THE CHARLES BROWNELL DONATION LAND CLAIM NO. 41; THENCE SOUTH 01°24'04" WEST ALONG SAID EAST LINE A DISTANCE OF 950.58 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. PARCEL B: THAT PORTION OF C.E. BROWNELL'S DONATION CLAIM NO. 41, AND OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER AND THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTH QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 13; THENCE NORTH 00°58'28" EAST ALONG THE NORTH - SOUTH CENTERLINE OF SAID SECTION 13- A DISTANCE OF 884.84 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF TRACT 26 OF RENTON SHORELANDS SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL MAPS, 1958; THENCE SOUTH 72°37'52" WEST ALONG THE SOUTH BOUNDARY OF SAID TRACT 26 A DISTANCE OF 382.60 FEET; THENCE NORTH 70°54'02" WEST ALONG SAID SOUTH BOUNDARY OF TRACT 26 A DISTANCE OF 73.50 FEET TO THE EAST LINE OF THE CHARLES BROWNELL DONATION LAND CLAIM NO. 41; THENCE NORTH 01°24'04" EAST ALONG- SAID EAST LINE OF THE CHARLES BROWNELL DONATION LAND CLAIM NO. 41 A DISTANCE OF 950.58 FEET TO A LINE 35 FEET SOUTHERLY OF AND PARALLEL WITH THE CENTERLINE OF THE EXISTING MOST SOUTHERLY TRACK OF THE CHICAGO, MILWAUKEE, ST. PAUL AND PACIFIC RAILROAD TRACKS AND THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE ON A CURVE TO THE LEFT, THE CENTER OF WHICH BEARS SOUTH 15°22'32" EAST HAVING A RADIUS OF 2,790.19 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 789.44 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 16°12'39" TO A POINT OF COMPOUND CURVE; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE ON A CURVE TO THE LEFT, THE CENTER OF WHICH BEARS SOUTH 31°35'11" EAST HAVING A RADIUS OF 2580.74 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 437.40 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 09°42'39" TO A POINT OF REVERSE CURVE; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE ON A CURVE TO THE RIGHT, THE CENTER OF WHICH BEARS NORTH 41°17'SO" WEST HAVING A RADIUS OF 428.64 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 73 .32 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 09°48'04" TO A POINT OF REVERSE CURVE; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE ON A CURVE TO THE LEFT, THE CENTER OF WHICH BEARS SOUTH 31°29'46" EAST HAVING A RADIUS OF 676.58 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF -93.64"FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 07°55'47" TO A POINT OF TANGENCY; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE SOUTH 50°34'27" WEST A DISTANCE OF 248.50 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVE; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE ON A CURVE TO THE LEFT, THE CENTER OF WHICH BEARS SOUTH 39°25'33" EAST HAVING A RADIUS OF 696.89 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 40.09 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF' 03 °17'45" TO THE SOUTH LINE OF THE BURLINGTON NORTHERN RAILROAD RIGHT OF WAY; THENCE NORTH 43°49'09" EAST ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE A DISTANCE OF 173.83 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVE; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE ON A CURVE TO THE RIGHT, THE CENTER OF WHICH BEARS SOUTH 46°10'51" EAST HAVING A RADIUS OF 4030.00 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 197.57 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 02 ° 48 '32" TO A POINT OF COMPOUND CURVE; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE. ON A CURVE TO THE RIGHT, THE CENTER OF WHICH BEARS SOUTH 43°22'19" EAST HAVING A RADIUS OF 1853.00 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 194.75 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 06 ° 01 '18" TO A POINT OF COMPOUND CURVE; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE ON A CURVE TO THE RIGHT, THE CENTER OF WHICH BEARS SOUTH 37°21'O1" EAST HAVING A RADIUS OF 10543.00 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 186.51 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 01°00'49" TO A POINT OF COMPOUND CURVE; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE ON A CURVE TO THE RIGHT, THE CENTER OF WHICH BEARS SOUTH 36°20'12" EAST HAVING A RADIUS OF 1657.00 FEET AN ARC DISTANCE OF 193.93 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 06 ° 42'20" TO A POINT OF COMPOUND CURVE; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE ON A CURVE TO THE RIGHT, THE CENTER OF WHICH BEARS SOUTH 29°37'52" EAST HAVING A RADIUS OF 6738.00 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 197.76 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF., 01° 4 0'5 4" TO A POINT OF COMPOUND CURVE;. THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE ON A CURVE TO THE RIGHT, THE CENTER OF WHICH BEARS SOUTH 27°56'58" EAST HAVING A RADIUS OF 1768.00 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 194.45 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 06 °18 ' 06" TO A POINT OF COMPOUND CURVE; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE ON A CURVE TO THE RIGHT, THE CENTER OF WHICH BEARS SOUTH 21°38'52" EAST HAVING A RADIUS OF 8603.00 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 204.54 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 01 °21'44" TO A POINT OF COMPOUND CURVE; . THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE ON A CURVE TO THE RIGHT, THE CENTER OF WHICH BEARS SOUTH 20°17'08" EAST HAVING A RADIUS OF 1922.10 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 178.79 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 05°19'46" TO A POINT OF COMPOUND CURVE ON THE EAST LINE OF SAID CHARLES, BROWNELL DONATION LAND CLAIM NO. 41; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE ON A CURVE TO THE RIGHT, THE CENTER OF WHICH BEARS SOUTH 14 °57'22" EAST HAVING A RADIUS OF 2814.93 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 659.42 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 13 ° 25'19" TO A POINT OF COMPOUND CURVE; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE ON A CURVE TO THE RIGHT, THE CENTER OF WHICH BEARS SOUTH 01°32'03" EAST HAVING A RADIUS OF 1165.09 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 1097.05 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 53°57'00" TO A POINT OF TANGENCY; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE SOUTH 37°35'03" EAST A DISTANCE OF 308.70- FEET TO A POINT OF CURVE; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE ON A CURVE TO THE LEFT, THE CENTER OF WHICH BEARS NORTH 52°24'57" EAST HAVING A RADIUS OF 1005.37 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 45.82 FEET THROUGH CENTRAL ANGLE OF 02°36'41: TO A LINE 35 FEET SOUTHERLY OF AND PARALLEL WITH THE CENTERLINE OF THE EXISTING MOST SOUTHERLY TRACK OF THE CHICAGO, MILWAUKEE, ST. PAUL AND PACIFIC RAILROAD TRACKS; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE NORTH 40°11'44" WEST A DISTANCE OF 126.24 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVE; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE ON A CURVE TO THE LEFT, THE CENTER OF WHICH BEARS SOUTH 49°48'16" WEST HAVING A RADIUS OF 1829.78 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 309.67 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 09°41'48"; THENCE NORTH 49 °53'32" WEST ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE A DISTANCE OF 167.07 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVE; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE ON A CURVE TO THE LEFT, THE CENTER OF WHICH BEARS SOUTH 40°06'28" WEST HAVING A RADIUS OF 1102.46 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 807.11- FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 41°56'46" TO A POINT OF COMPOUND CURVE; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE ON A CURVE TO THE LEFT, THE CENTER OF WHICH BEARS SOUTH 01°50'18" EAST HAVING A RADIUS OF 2790.19 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 659.24 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 13°32'14" TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. PARCEL C: THAT PORTION OF TRACT 25, RENTON SHORELANDS 2ND SUPPLEMENTAL; AND THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, AND THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 13, AND THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING•AT THE SOUTH QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 13; THENCE NORTH 00°58'28" EAST ALONG THE NORTH - SOUTH CENTERLINE OF SAID SECTION 13, A DISTANCE OF 884.84 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF TRACT 26 OF RENTON SHORELANDS SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL MAPS, 1958, AND THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 72°37'52" WEST ALONG THE SOUTH BOUNDARY OF SAID TRACT 26 , A DISTANCE OF 382.60 FEET; THENCE NORTH 70°54'02" WEST ALONG THE SOUTH BOUNDARY OF SAID TRACT 26, A DISTANCE OF 73.51 FEET TO THE EAST LINE OF THE CHARLES BROWNELL DONATION , LAND CLAIM NO. 41; THENCE NORTH 01°24'04" EAST ALONG SAID EAST LINE, A DISTANCE OF 950.58 FEET TO A LINE 35 FEET SOUTHERLY OF AND PARALLEL WITH THE CENTERLINE OF THE EXISTING MOST SOUTHERLY TRACK OF THE CHICAGO, MILWAUKEE, ST. PAUL AND PACIFIC RAILROAD TRACKS; THENCE ALONG SAID LINE 35 FEET SOUTHERLY OF AND PARALLEL WITH THE CENTERLINE OF THE MOST SOUTHERLY TRACK, ALONG A CURVE TO THE RIGHT, THE CENTER OF WHICH BEARS SOUTH 15°22'32" EAST, HAVING A RADIUS OF 2,790.19 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 659.24 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 13°32'14" , TO A POINT OF COMPOUND CURVE; THENCE ALONG A CURVE TO THE RIGHT, ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE, THE CENTER OF WHICH BEARS SOUTH 01°50'18" EAST HAVING A RADIUS OF 1,102.46 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF' 807.11 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 41°56'46"; THENCE SOUTH 4,9°53'32" EAST, ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE, A DISTANCE OF 167.07 FEET; THENCE ALONG A CURVE TO THE RIGHT, ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE, HAVING A RADIUS OF 1,829.78 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 309.67 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 09°41'48"; THENCE LEAVING SAID PARALLEL LINE, SOUTH 40°11'44" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 126.24 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTH LINE OF THE BURLINGTON NORTHERN RAILROAD RIGHT OF WAY; THENCE ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT, ALONG 'SAID SOUTH LINE, THE CENTER OF WHICH BEARS NORTH 49 °48'16" EAST HAVING A RADIUS OF 1,005.37 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 549.02 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 31°17'19" TO A POINT TANGENT ON SAID SOUTH LINE OF THE BURLINGTON NORTHERN RAILROAD RIGHT OF WAY; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE, SOUTH 71°29'03" EAST ALONG A LINE 50 FEET SOUTH OF AND PARALLEL WITH THE EXISTING SOUTHBOUND TRACT, A DISTANCE OF 826.56 FEET TO THE WEST LINE OF SAID SECTION 18; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE SOUTH 71°29'03" EAST,A DISTANCE OF 85.52 FEET TO THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTH 650 FEET OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 18; THENCE NORTH 89°10'25" WEST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 18, A DISTANCE OF 81.57 FEET TO THE EAST LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 13; THENCE NORTH 88 °15'00" WEST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTH 650 FEET OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 13, A DISTANCE OF 2,261.41 FEET TO AN ANGLE POINT ON THE SOUTH BOUNDARY OF TRACT 25 OF RENTON SHORE LANDS, 1958; THENCE _ NORTH 33°07'25" WEST ALONG SAID SOUTH BOUNDARY, A DISTANCE OF 154.51 FEET TO AN ANGLE POINT; THENCE NORTH 2 7°21'3 2" EAST ALONG SAID SOUTH BOUNDARY, A DISTANCE OF 387.32 FEET TO AN ANGLE POINT; THENCE NORTH 83°17'25" WEST ALONG SAID SOUTH BOUNDARY, A DISTANCE OF 171.17 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 46°22'22" WEST ALONG SAID SOUTH BOUNDARY, A DISTANCE OF 324.66 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 72°37'52" WEST ALONG SAID SOUTH BOUNDARY, A DISTANCE OF 76.33 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. SURVEY DISK #7 BRH JOB #85235 .05 - APRIL 16 , 1986 • BUSF -DED & HITCHINGS. INC. EXHIBIT #2 NACHES AVENUE SOUTHWEST (TOTAL 60 ' RIGHT—OF—WAY IN BLACK RIVER CORPORATE PARK) : THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTH HALF OF SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M.,. KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, LYING WITHIN 30.00 FEET ON EACH SIDE OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED CENTERLINE: BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTH 650.00 FEET OF SAID SECTION 13 WHICH IS NORTH 88°15'00" WEST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE 1626.50 FEET FROM THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID SECTION 13; THENCE NORTH 1 °45'00" EAST 225.00 FEET; THENCE ON A CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING' A RADIUS OF 853.34 FEET A DISTANCE OF 209.55 FEET; THENCE NORTH 12°19'12" WEST 329.69 FEET; THENCE ON A CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF 600.00 FEET A DISTANCE OF 724.11 FEET TO A LINE WHICH IS PARALLEL WITH AND 55.00 FEET SOUTHERLY, WHEN MEASURED RADIALLY FROM THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF THE CHICAGO, MILWAUKEE, ST. PAUL AND PACIFIC RAILROAD RIGHT—OF—WAY; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE 2082.08 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 46°10'35" WEST 301.71 FEET TO A POINT WHICH IS 54.10 FEET WHEN MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES TO THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID CHICAGO, MILWAUKEE, ST. PAUL AND PACIFIC RAILROAD RIGHT—OF—WAY; THENCE SOUTH 43 °49'09" WEST PARALLEL WITH SAID SOUTHERLY LINE 254.90 FEET; THENCE ON A CURVE TO LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF 250.00 FEET A DISTANCE OF 143.00 FEET, MORE OR LESS TO THE NORTH BOUNDARY OF A TRACT OF LAND DEEDED TO KING COUNTY BY DEED RECORDED UNDER AUDITOR'S FILE NO. 6607786, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY AND THE END OF SAID CENTERLINE DESCRIPTION. FIRST CITY EQUITIES BLACK RIVER CORPORATE PARK NOVEMBER 17, 1986 BRH NO. 86114.01 SURVEY DISK 12 v.- kCi ERGO�J`Z f{1 �0.1A1. I.t S�per OF R , 411 ° BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT 0 ® Z Z o RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 • 235-2540 90 co. •.;) SEPTc0c3 BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR MEMORANDUM DATE: March 13, 1987 TO: Donald G. Monaghan Design Engineer FROM: Ronald G. Nelson Building and Zoning Official SUBJECT: Road Permit for Expanding of Naches Avenue Adjacent to Admac Site, File SA-057-86, V-0 I spoke to Jeanette today about the Admac site plan review file which included approval of the extension of Naches Avenue along the Admac site. Jeanette's review of the file shows that the Hearing Examiner approved the site plan and roadway extension subject to the preparation and filing of covenants. Jeanette discussed the matter with Barbara Moss today telling her that until the required covenants are in and approved by the Examiner, the approval is not complete. Therefore, technically, there are no approvals for the extension of Naches on the Admac Building. Jeanette mentioned that Barbara will provide these covenants to the City on Monday for Fred's approval. I feel that based upon this information, the permit for the extension of Naches Avenue should not be issued until Fred approves the covenants and the file is complete. RN:JSM:csb 3557Z le.„._ / 4. ' CITY OF REND ' Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney A Daniel Kellogg - David M. Dean -Mark E. Barber - Zanetta L. Fontes -Theodore R. Parry Assistant City Attorneys March 23 , 1987 TO: Ron Nelson, Building and Zoning Director FROM: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney RE: First City Equities • Dear Ron: I received a copy of the proposed Agreement between the City and First City Equities to implement conditions No. 1 and 2 of Site Plan Approval No. SA-057-86 . I have the following comments: 1. There is no necessity for the City to enter into any agreement. The developer is to prepare the necessary restrictive convenants. I do not like paragraph 5 which says that the agreement shall be binding on all parties . That is the reason why I do not want the City to be a party to any agreement. 2 . The Hearing Examiner' s Decision requires a reservation of 80 feet. The agreement reserves 60 feet . fII have also reviewed the agreement to develop a benefit assessment district. I am bothered that the agreement gives control of the study to the developer' s consultant and I wonder how the City can exert , any control over that type of study. What happens if the City does not like the study results? The City needs to make sure that there is some method for it to have equal control over the study and some way to disavow the results if they are clearly not in the City' s best interest. The way the agreement is drafted, we are agreeing to accept the study results before we have obtained them. It is hard to understand how that will mitigate environmental impacts if we do not know how they are to be mitigated. C ,�.� / 7 Lawrence . Warren LJW:nd cc: Mayor t},✓+w�..- e,,,A,1,14_tj:/ ///Ai 6#:E(f4(' - (}6-?..1„,‘ ` .. =-5J'2..` ?? Post Office Box 626 - 100 S 2nd Street - Renton, Washington 98057 - (206) 255-8678 INTEROFFICE MEMO lee°41 TO: Larry Warren , City Attorney DATE: March 11, 1987 FROM: Ron Nelson, Building & Zoning Director SUBJECT: REGIONAL TRAFFIC ANALYSIS FROM BLACK RIVER CORPORATE PARK This is the latest proposal from First City Equities on the regional traffic analysis of Black River Corporate Park. Please review and respond. Thanks. RGN: cc Attachment OF R4, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT "..4* ,i?a (': 0 MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE.SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 U t% 0 0 z 0 DESIGN/UTILITY ENGINEERING - 235-2631 V 'Ao ,35 (i...... 9gTFD 1°'P ‘TRAFFIC ENGINEERING DIVISION - 235-2620l 0 (AA x- . i ,, ( TO: PUv\ `l ric 5 t07r-\ DATE: 3` / 9— y� 7 JOB NO.: �i"1 11. 1,L+r. ( Yi I S:ri'�i.; RE: f 6 449e-'ei+-isri-s-T 7 lli i. COY. - 5 ,1 `le.A/e-49, Q hen ekl - Sc"S. 1'ze-,v-7 - s/ )c/ , ATTN: 74 'r2 /• Gr.4y C-02-rreoil- GENTLEMEN: O WE ARE SENDING YOU ❑ ATTACHED ❑ UNDER SEPARATE COVER VIA THE FOLLOWING ITEMS: ❑ SHOP DRAWINGS a PRINTS ❑t�,f REPRODUCIBLE PLANS a SPECIFICATIONS ` ❑ COPY OF LETTER X � rt'e�d Y e 61114 U r / ( DIS 474 COPIES DATE NUMBER i DESCRIPTION AND REMARKS 3-10- git�k rye*. /LL� �.. Pt,v. -49ree-i /-04 a ki a &e.h f �- e cS/n as ,01 -2-.2.- 7 J Pro asd -g e 77Z/m Pa 6(7 A- ?"--(cgy Ara, 1 / Desei'iiin,1 di IVa ael yOS decay'71..1u. V -/ll..e-,, , 'rare✓ / 6-2( / g4 TA ,&s,.e,- %G,ki.t.icy? P�-k Tr-a ,%4� _,7:1-71,p_eck Aka-4 s9s . THESE ARE TRANSMITTED AS CHECKED BELOW: ❑ FOR APPROVAL ❑ APPROVED AS SUBMITTED o RESUBMIT COPIES FOR APPROVAL • FOR YOUR USE ❑ APPROVED AS NOTED ❑ SUBMIT COPIES FOR DISTRIBUTION o AS REQUESTED ❑ RETURNED FOR CORRECTIONS ❑ RETURN CORRECTED PRINTS o FOR REVIEW AND COMMENT ❑ ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US COPIES TO: SIGNED 2/ 4' 14 TITLE 7i.0/..".%e-e-- , IF ENCLOSURES ARE NOT AS NOTED, KINDLY NOTIFY US AT ONCE ,fiptitti c'`') EXHIBIT 1 Tht? Transportation Planning & Traffic Engineering Consultants TRANSPO Grow February 2, 1987 Ms. Barbara Moss First City Equities 800 Fifth Avenue, Suite 4170 Seattle, WA 98104 Dear Ms. Moss: Thank you for asking The TRANSPO Group to assist you in developing a traffic impact and cost assessment methodology in connection with needed transporta- tion improvements in South Renton. This is a challenging assignment because of your time constraints and the expectations 'of the City of Renton. Based on a review of previous relevant work and information provided by Gary Norris and other staff within the Renton Traffic Division, we have developed the attached scope of work. We have formatted it as Attachment A to your standard contract and have included our rate sheet, which in the past had been labeled as Attachment C. After clearing it with you, I am complying with Gary Norris.' request to trans- mit 5 copies of this submittal to him in time for the February 4, 1987 10 AM meeting of the ERC Board. Should you have any concern about this after reviewing, please call Gary. You would have the option of asking him to withhold discussion and approval of the, scope at the meeting. , Thank you for including us in this unique and challenging project. We appre- ciate working for First City Equities and enjoy your businesslike and profes- sional manner in developing projects. Sincerely, The TRANSPO Group, Inc. J:. 're A. Webber, P.E. P inci'ial Engineer JAW/bb Enclosure: Rate Sheet cc: Gary Norris (5 submittal copies) The TRANSPO Group, Inc. • 14715 Bel-Red Road,Suite 100, Bellevue,Washington 98007-3940 • (206)641-3881 The ATTACHMENT A TRA►NSPO l of 6 crop GRADY WAY CORRIDOR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT STUDY BACKGROUND This study is being conducted at the request of the City of Renton in order to assess the impacts of full development on the transportation network in South Renton. The study area is bounded by the Burlington Northern Railway (Old Milwaukee Line) along the north, the Union Pacific Railway on the west, and Interstate 405 (I-405) on the south and east. Because of its interests in the results of this. assessment, the City agrees to furnish the following items: 1. Software and documentation to the City's enhanced .T-model traffic model together with files describing networks and trip tables as necessary to support this modeling effort. 2. Data on existing and potential land use development in the study area. Data will include number of housing units and square feet of non-residential develoment. by general categories (retail, industrial, office). The City's "full development" scenario will be assumed as the potential for the area. 3. List of TSM policies and measures to be assumed for future trip generation estimates in the study area. A preliminary list will be proposed by TRANSPO. 4. List of additional transportation improvements to be assumed for - future "full development" scenario. This should include regional improvements that might affect traffic volumes in the study area. A preliminary listing will be proposed by TRANSPO. The City also agrees that the costs of this study shall be included in the- cost of total study area transportation improvements considered within the benefit assessment area. From those total costs, suitably allocated. between responsible agency/organization shares, will be derived a cost assessment methodology subject to agreement between the City of Renton and participating developers. SCOPE For the study area described above, The TRANSPO Group will perform the. following: Task 1. Determine requirements of First City Equities (FCE) and the City of Renton; develop a scope of work satisfactory to both. Administer the contract per the progress reporting 'and cost accounting requirements of FCE. The ATTACHMENT A TRANSI'V • 2 of 6 Grovp Task 2. Refine the Renton Enhanced T-Model traffic model by further splitting the traffic analysis zones and adding links to the network within the study area. Validate the modifications for the base year and calibrate as necessary. Task 3. Develop the traffic forecasts for the study area assuming a "full development" scenario. Expand the trip ends within the study area based on land use information supplied by the City of Renton Planning Department. Update the vehicle trip table for the future year 2000. Analyze the resulting traffic in relation to the existing and committed improvements: S Grady Way/Talbot Road Intersection Rebuild SW Grady Way - Lind to Rainier Lane Widening SW Grady Way/Lind Avenue Intersection Rebuild 0akesdale Avenue SW - Grady to Monster Roadway Construction SW 7th & Hardie Signalization SW Grady Way & Powell Avenue Signalization. Identify additional facility needs in keeping with logical additions to network including, but not limited to, the following: I-405/Talbot Road Interchange Reconstruction of Rainier/Grady Intersection Capacity SW 7th & Rainier Avenue SW - Capacity SW 7th & Lind Avenue SW - Capacity 0akesdale Avenue = Monster to Empire Way Roadway Widening SW Grady & Maple Avenue Signalization. Review the results with the City. Task 4. Identify dprogram of Transportation System Management (TSM) - policies and measures that are feasible for implementation as a public/private effort in the study area. Modify the trip generation assumptions accordingly and revise the traffic loadings. In conjunction with the 'City of Renton, determine additional capital needs (transporta- tion facilities) in the study area (for "full development" scenario). Add to traffic network, make traffic assignment, and prepare conceptual designs suitable for cost estimates. Task 5. Using the methods developed by CH2M HILL in the Valley Transpor- tation Improvements Program (Valley TIP)., updated to reflect subsequent City experience, estimate costs of the facility needs for arterial/highway improvements. • Task 6. Allocate costs, recognizing the costs or contributions to the costs involved in the list of existing and committed improvements above plus the cost of this study, into responsible agency/organization shares -- that is, between highway user responsibility and land development responsibility. Review the results with the City. 1 The • ATTACHMENT A "MAIVSP0 . 3of6 GrOW • Task 7. Determine traffic impact assessment methodology (for share of costs assignable to developer), including rates per trip end. Include a priority array of needed improvements by order of importance for use by the City in allocating available funds. Task 8. Document the above study process in a manner suitable for presen- tation. Prepare a draft similar in style and format to the Valley TIP report for distribution to reviewing authorities. Task 9. Present the results of the report to the City of Renton. Presen- tation shall include distribution of five copies of the draft report for formal review comments. Task 10. Integrate final review comments and prepare one proof copy of a final report for review by City of Renton. On approval of the proof copy, prepare 25 bound copies and one camera ready unbound copy of the final report for, delivery to the City. SCHEDULE The attached Schedule highlights major checkpoints and product delivery. All effort will be made to accelerate it. COST The attached Manpower Requirement and Fee Determination represents a budgetary estimate. It has met the approval of the City of Renton in association with • the above task descriptions, and reflects the effort they intended for the Grady Way Corridor Study. Guaranteed Maximum Price is$26,810.00. Reimbursables are estimated at $950.00. r • First city 59cr/ties ' Grady Way Corridor Transportation improvement' Program Ftb• '87. Mat- '87 . : ... A?'.' '87 . ....Isla:/ '87 ,Tu✓�, '87. . . . : : TASKS MONTH # / 2 3 SL S I. Develop Scope & Administer I 2. Refine Sub-area Model I r.fI I *3. Detail Traffic Forecasts I AI x. A a *4. Iopact Mitigation/Needs �' 5. Develop Cost Estimates —4rn rn z 6. Cost Allocation A . � v *7. Determine Assessment Method I 0.. I 8. Document Results & Draft F----A 9. Present to City } 10. Integrate Comments & Final . ////////////////—I . Key p- Check-Pon�7` meet/nj Oh Ci / s�ul�' ix — Cray P--eview : , ... S. iggi . ATTACHMENT. A " 5of6 The TRANSPO Grove The TRANSPO Group, Inc. - Bellevue, Washington Brady Way Corridor Transportation Improvement Program MANPOWER REQUIREMENT Principal Project Senior Tech/ Clerical/ Total TASKS Engineer Manager Analyst Draft Administ. 1. Develop Scope & Administer 12 12 8 4 4 40 2. Refine Sub-area Model 40 6 8 54 *3—Detail Traffic Forecasts 2 24 18 8 2 54 *4. Impact Mitigation/Needs 4 32 8 20 4 68 5. Develop Cost Estimates 4 8 4. 2 18 6. Cost Allocation 2 4 4 8 18 *7. Determine Assessment Method 2 4 20 12 38 8. Document Results & Draft 4 • 32 12 40 12 100 4. Present to City 6 6 6 12 2 32 10. Integrate Comments & Final . ' 2 12 4 12 4 34 . TOTAL 38 174 86 128 30 456 • * Meetings with the City of Renton Traffic and/or other departments are included follow- ing Tasks 3, 4, and 7 to verify progress to date and permit review by City staff of key check-points in the study. • • PREPARED BY: CHECKED BY: DATE:__ ./rt7 REVISION # ATTACHMENT A 6 of 6 Alien, M 1 I ANSI'V Gro\Jp CONSULTANT FEE DETERMINATION - SUMMARY SHEET PROJECT: Grady Way Corridor Transportation Improvement Program A. TIME RELATED COSTS: Classification Hours x Rate = Cost Principal Engineer 38 $92.50 $3,515.00 Project Manager 174 $61.00 $10,614.00 Senior Analyst 86 $76.50 _ $6,579.00 Tech/Drafter 128 $39.00 $4,992.00 Clerical/Administrative 30 $37.00 $1,110.00 Subtotal 456 $58.79 $26,810.00 GUARANTEED MAXIMUM PRICE IS: $26,810.00 B. SUBCONSULTANTS: (Mark-up @ 10 X) Quote Marked-up NONE C. REIMBURSABLES: (Mark-up @ 0 %) Estimate Marked-up Mileage $50.00 $50.00 Reproduction $300.00 $300.00 Computer Time $300.00 $300.00 Photo-mylars $200.00 $200.00 Communication $100.00 $100.00 $950.00 $950.00 • GRAND TOTAL - ESTIMATED FEE (A+B+C) $27,760.00 PREPARED BY:_ • CHECKED BY: p DATE: .2�3��7 REVISION it r. . u r �. _ .CHMENT "C" The Transportation Planning & Traffic Engineering Consultants TRANSPO • *row Effective: January I, 1987 through June 30, 1987 TIME AND MATERIALS RATE STRUCTURE FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES • Hourly Labor Title Billing Rate Principal Engineer $ 92.50 Engineer VII $ 85.00 Engineer VI $ 78.00 Engineer V $ 67.00 Engineer IV $ 61.00 Engineer III $ 49.00 Engineer II $ 44.00 .Engineer I $ 37.00 Senior Transportation Analyst $ 76.50 Transportation Analyst $ 39.00 Technician IV $ 36.00 Administrative Secretary $ 40.00 Secretary $ 37.00 Contract Administrator $ 47.00 Includes all salary and salary related costs, general office overhead and profit margin. Subject to change on January I and July I of each year to cover salary and overhead rate adjustments. DIRECT COSTS Reimbursable project related expenses will be invoiced to the client at cost. A 10 percent administrative charge will be added to subconsultant fees. TERMS . Fees for services will be invoiced monthly and are due and payable upon receipt. A late charge of one and one-half percent (I-I/2%) per month, computed from date of invoice, will be due on invoices not paid within thirty days from date of invoice. I he I RANSNO Croup, Inc. • 14 1; Bel-Red Road.Suite 11)0, Belle%ue, Washington hin}ton 98007-3940 • 1206)641-38111 EXHIBIT 2 DESCRIPTION: VALLEY 405 , BURLINGTON NORTHERN PROPERTY: THAT. PORTION OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M. KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON AND OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 24, SAID TOWNSHIP AND RANGE, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING ON THE EAST LINE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 24, AT A POINT NORTH 1°05 ' 00" EAST ALONG SAID EAST LINE 1804 .20 FEET FROM THE CENTER OF SAID SECTION 24; THENCE NORTH 89°16 ' 47" WEST 1033.53 FEET TO THE EASTERLY MARGIN OF 72ND AVENUE SOUTH, FORMERLY COUNTY ROAD . NO. 8 (ALSO KNOWN AS THE CHARLES MONSTER ROAD) ; THENCE NORTH 1°26 ' 34" WEST ALONG SAID EASTERLY MARGIN 404.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89°16 ' 47" EAST 200 FEET; THENCE NORTH 0°43 '13" EAST 300.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89°16 ' 47" WEST 86 .42 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF A TRACT OF LAND CONVEYED TO METRO AND DESCRIBED IN DEED FILED UNDER RECORDER'S NO. 8207300283, - RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY AND THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID SOUTHWESTERLY LINE AND ON A CURVE, OF WHICH THE RADIUS POINT BEARS NORTH 56°16 ' 42" EAST 722 .96 FEET, A DISTANCE OF 142.43 FEET; THENCE NORTH 22°26 '02" WEST ALONG SAID SOUTHWESTERLY LINE 56 .79 FEET TO THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 24; THENCE SOUTH 87°26 ' 40" EAST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE 341.02 FEET TO THE NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF SAID METRO TRACT, SAID NORTHEASTERLY LINE BEING ALSO THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF TRACT A, WASHINGTON TECHNICAL CENTER AS RECORDED IN VOLUME 122 OF PLATS, PAGES 98 TO 102 , RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID SOUTHWESTERLY LINE AND ON A CURVE OF WHICH THE RADIUS POINT BEARS NORTH 55°39 '29' EAST 422 .96 FEET, A DISTANCE OF 87.91 FEET; THENCE NORTH 22°26 ' 02" WEST ALONG SAID SOUTHWESTERLY LINE 263 .09 FEET TO A LINE DESIGNATED "PERMANENT EASEMENT BOUNDARY" ON U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE MAP, SHEET 1 OF 3, ENTITLED "LAND RIGHTS WORK MAP, P-1 CHANNEL, EAST SIDE GREEN RIVER WPP, CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON" ; THENCE ALONG SAID LINE AND ON A CURVE, THE RADIUS POINT OF WHICH BEARS NORTH 5°24 ' 02" EAST 165.04 FEET A DISTANCE OF 112 . 06 FEET TO A POINT OF REVERSE CURVE, THE RADIUS POINT OF WHICH BEARS SOUTH 44°18 ' 11" WEST 172. 96 FEET; THENCE ALONG SAID REVERSE CURVE AND SAID LINE 133 .74 FEET; THENCE WEST ALONG SAID LINE 367.02 FEET TO A LINE WHICH BEARS NORTH FROM A POINT ON THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 13 WHICH IS 1271. 76 FEET EAST OF THE SOUTHWEST CORNER THEREOF; THENCE SOUTH 143 . 95 FEET TO THE NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF THE CHARLES MONSTER COUNTY ROAD; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID NORTHEASTERLY LINE TO A POINT WHICH BEARS NORTH 89°16' 47" WEST FROM THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 89°16 ' 47" EAST 125.40 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. FCE 11,1Cit; EivEt %FCC/ND L O&f p,4 g,<- PARCEL A: THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; AND THAT PORTION OF JUNCTION ADDITION TO THE CITY OF SEATTLE, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 12 OF PLATS, PAGE 75, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; TOGETHER WITH VACATED STREETS ADJOINING WHICH WOULD ATTACH TO SAID PREMISES BY OPERATION OF LAW; AND OF C.E. BROWNELL'S DONATION CLAIM NO. 41 AND OF THAT PORTION OF TRACT 26, RENTON SHORELANDS 2ND SUPPLEMENTAL, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTH QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 13; THENCE NORTH 00°58 '28" EAST ALONG THE NORTH - SOUTH CENTERLINE OF SAID SECTION 13 A DISTANCE OF 884 .84 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF TRACT 26 OF RENTON SHORELANDS SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL MAPS, 1958; THENCE SOUTH 72°37 ' 52" WEST ALONG THE SOUTH BOUNDARY OF SAID TRACT 26 A DISTANCE OF 382.60 FEET; THENCE NORTH 70°54 ' 02" WEST ALONG SAID SOUTH BOUNDARY OF TRACT 26 A DISTANCE OF 73.50 FEET TO THE EAST LINE OF THE CHARLES BROWNELL DONATION LAND CLAIM NO. 41 AND THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING NORTH 70°54 ' 02" WEST ALONG SAID SOUTH BOUNDARY OF TRACT 26 A DISTANCE OF 281.02 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 73°56 ' 01" WEST ALONG SAID SOUTH BOUNDARY OF TRACT 26 A DISTANCE OF 130.08 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 41°6' 07" WEST ALONG SAID SOUTH BOUNDARY OF TRACT 26 A DISTANCE OF 316.18 FEET TO THE NORTH BOUNDARY OF A TRACT OF LAND DEEDED TO KING COUNTY AND DESCRIBED UNDER KING COUNTY RECORDING NUMBER 6607786; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG SAID NORTH BOUNDARY ON A CURVE TO THE LEFT, THE CENTER OF WHICH BEARS SOUTH 39°41'39" WEST HAVING A RADIUS OF 627.46 FEET AN ARC DISTANCE OF 434.70 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 39 °41'39"; THENCE NORTH A DISTANCE OF 25.00 FEET ALONG SAID NORTH BOUNDARY; THENCE WEST A DISTANCE OF 280.69 FEET ALONG, SAID NORTH BOUNDARY; THENCE SOUTH 59°53 ' 47" WEST ALONG. SAID NORTH BOUNDARY DISTANCE OF 377.52 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 74°13 ' 19" WEST ALONG SAID NORTH BOUNDARY A DISTANCE OF 443.31 FEET TO THE NORTHERLY MARGIN OF THE CHARLES MONSTER COUNTY ROAD_, THENCE NORTH 34°18 ' 31" WEST ALONG SAID NORTHERLY MARGIN A DISTANCE OF 43.46 FEET TO THE SOUTH LINE OF THE BURLINGTON NORTHERN RAILROAD RIGHT OF WAY; THENCE ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT, ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE, THE CENTER OF WHICH BEARS NORTH 06°34 ' 41" WEST HAVING A RADIUS OF 696.00 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 45. 43 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 03°44 ' 25" TO A POINT OF COMPOUND CURVE; THENCE ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT, ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE, THE CENTER OF WHICH BEARS NORTH 10°19 '06" WEST HAVING A RADIUS OF 1,055.00 FEET AN ARC DISTANCE OF 209.95 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 11°24 ' 08" TO A POINT OF COMPOUND CURVE; THENCE ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT, ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE, THE CENTER OF WHICH BEARS NORTH 21°43 '14" WEST HAVING A RADIUS OF 727.00 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 214.77 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 16°55 ' 35" TO A POINT OF COMPOUND CURVE; THENCE ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT, ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE,THE CENTER OF WHICH BEARS NORTH 38°38'49" WEST HAVING A RADIUS OF 1,571.00 FEET AN ARC DISTANCE OF 206.57 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 07°32'02" TO A POINT OF TANGENCY; THENCE NORTH 43 °49'09" EAST ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE A DISTANCE OF 97.17 FEET TO A LINE 35 FEET SOUTHERLY OF AND PARALLEL WITH THE CENTERLINE OF THE EXISTING MOST SOUTHERLY TRACK OF THE CHICAGO, MILWAUKEE, ST. PAUL AND PACIFIC RAILROAD TRACKS; THENCE ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE ON A CURVE TO THE RIGHT, THE CENTER OF WHICH BEARS SOUTH 42°43'18" EAST HAVING A RADIUS OF 696.89 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 40.09 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 03°17'45"; THENCE NORTH 50°34'27" EAST ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE A DISTANCE OF 248.50 FEET; THENCE ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE ON A CURVE TO THE RIGHT, THE CENTER OF WHICH BEARS SOUTH 39 °25'33" EAST HAVING A RADIUS OF 676.58 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 93.64 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 07°55'47" TO A POINT OF REVERSE CURVE; THENCE ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE ON A CURVE TO THE LEFT, THE CENTER OF WHICH BEARS NORTH 31°29'46" WEST HAVING A RADIUS OF 428.64 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 73.32 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 09°48'04" TO 'A POINT OF REVERSE CURVE; THENCE ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE ON A CURVE TO THE RIGHT, THE CENTER OF WHICH BEARS SOUTH 41°17'50" EAST HAVING A RADIUS OF 2,580.74 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 437.40 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 09°42'39" TO A POINT OF COMPOUND CURVE; THENCE ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE ON A CURVE TO THE RIGHT, THE CENTER OF WHICH BEARS SOUTH 31°35'11" EAST HAVING A RADIUS OF 2,790.19 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 789.44 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 16 °12'39" TO THE EAST LINE OF THE CHARLES BROWNELL DONATION LAND CLAIM NO. 41; THENCE SOUTH 01°24'04" WEST ALONG SAID EAST LINE A DISTANCE OF 950.58 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. PARCEL B: THAT PORTION OF C.E. BROWNELL'S DONATION CLAIM NO. 41, AND OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER AND THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTH QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 13; THENCE NORTH 00°58'28" EAST ALONG THE NORTH - SOUTH CENTERLINE OF SAID SECTION 13 A DISTANCE OF 884.84 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF TRACT 26 OF RENTON SHORELANDS SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL MAPS, 1958; THENCE SOUTH 72 °37'52" WEST ALONG THE SOUTH BOUNDARY OF SAID TRACT 26 A DISTANCE OF 382.60 FEET; THENCE NORTH 70 °54'02" WEST ALONG SAID SOUTH BOUNDARY OF TRACT 26 A DISTANCE OF 73.50 FEET TO THE EAST LINE OF THE CHARLES BROWNELL DONATION LAND CLAIM NO. 41; THENCE NORTH 01°24 '04" EAST ALONG SAID EAST LINE OF THE CHARLES BROWNELL DONATION LAND CLAIM NO. 41 A DISTANCE OF 950.58 FEET TO A LINE 35 FEET SOUTHERLY OF AND PARALLEL WITH THE CENTERLINE OF THE EXISTING MOST SOUTHERLY TRACK OF THE CHICAGO, MILWAUKEE, ST. PAUL AND PACIFIC RAILROAD TRACKS AND THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE ON A CURVE TO THE LEFT, THE CENTER OF WHICH BEARS SOUTH 15°22'32" EAST HAVING A RADIUS OF 2,790.19 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 789.44 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 16°12'39" TO A POINT OF COMPOUND CURVE; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE ON A CURVE TO THE LEFT, THE CENTER OF WHICH BEARS SOUTH 31°35'11" EAST HAVING A RADIUS OF 2580.74 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 437.40 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 09°42'39" TO A POINT OF REVERSE CURVE; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE ON A CURVE TO THE RIGHT, THE CENTER OF WHICH BEARS NORTH 41°17'50" WEST HAVING A RADIUS OF 428.64 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 73 .32 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 09°48'04" TO A POINT OF REVERSE CURVE; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE ON A CURVE TO THE LEFT, THE CENTER OF WHICH BEARS SOUTH 31°29'46" EAST HAVING A RADIUS OF 676.58 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 93.64 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 07°55'47" TO A POINT OF TANGENCY; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE SOUTH 50°34'27" WEST A DISTANCE OF 248.50 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVE; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE ON A CURVE TO THE LEFT, THE CENTER OF WHICH BEARS SOUTH 39°25'33" EAST HAVING A RADIUS OF 696.89 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 40.09 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 03 °17'45" TO THE SOUTH LINE OF THE BURLINGTON NORTHERN RAILROAD RIGHT OF WAY; THENCE NORTH 43°49'09" EAST ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE A DISTANCE OF 173.83 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVE; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE ON A CURVE TO THE RIGHT, THE CENTER OF WHICH BEARS SOUTH 46°10'51" EAST HAVING A RADIUS OF 4030.00 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 197.57 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 02 ° 48 '32" TO A POINT OF COMPOUND CURVE; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE ON A CURVE TO THE RIGHT, THE CENTER OF WHICH BEARS SOUTH 43 °22'19" EAST HAVING A RADIUS OF 1853.00 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 194.75 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 06 ° 01'18" TO A POINT OF COMPOUND CURVE; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE ON A CURVE TO THE RIGHT, THE CENTER OF WHICH BEARS SOUTH 37°21'O1" EAST HAVING A RADIUS OF 10543.00 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 186.51 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 01°00'49" TO A POINT OF COMPOUND CURVE; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE ON A CURVE TO THE RIGHT, THE CENTER OF WHICH BEARS SOUTH 36°20'12" EAST HAVING A RADIUS OF 1657.00 FEET AN ARC DISTANCE OF 193.93 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 06 ° 42 '20" TO A POINT OF COMPOUND CURVE; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE ON A CURVE TO THE RIGHT, THE CENTER OF WHICH BEARS SOUTH 29°37'52" EAST HAVING A RADIUS OF 6738.00 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 197.76 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF„ 01° 4 0 '5 4" TO A POINT OF COMPOUND CURVE; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE ON A CURVE TO THE RIGHT, THE CENTER OF WHICH BEARS SOUTH 27 °56'58" EAST HAVING A RADIUS OF 1768.00 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 194.45 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 06 ° 18 ' 06 " TO A POINT OF COMPOUND CURVE; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE ON A CURVE TO THE RIGHT, THE CENTER OF WHICH BEARS SOUTH 21°38'52" EAST HAVING A RADIUS OF 8603.00 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 204.54 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF O1 °21' 44" TO A POINT OF COMPOUND CURVE; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE ON A CURVE TO THE RIGHT, THE CENTER OF WHICH BEARS SOUTH 20°17'08" EAST HAVING A RADIUS OF 1922.10 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 178.79 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 05°19'46" TO A POINT OF COMPOUND CURVE ON THE EAST LINE OF SAID CHARLES BROWNELL DONATION LAND CLAIM NO. 41; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE ON A CURVE TO THE RIGHT, THE CENTER OF WHICH BEARS SOUTH 14 °57'22" EAST HAVING A RADIUS OF 2814.93 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 659.42 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 13 °25 ' 19" TO A POINT OF COMPOUND CURVE; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE ON A CURVE TO THE RIGHT, THE CENTER OF WHICH BEARS SOUTH O1°32'03" EAST HAVING A RADIUS OF 1165.09 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 1097.05 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 53°57'00" TO A POINT OF TANGENCY; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE SOUTH 37°35'03" EAST A DISTANCE OF 308.70 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVE; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE ON A CURVE TO THE LEFT, THE CENTER OF WHICH BEARS NORTH 52°24'57" EAST HAVING A RADIUS OF 1005.37 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 45.82 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 02 °36'41: TO A LINE 35 FEET SOUTHERLY OF AND PARALLEL WITH THE CENTERLINE OF THE EXISTING MOST SOUTHERLY, TRACK OF THE CHICAGO, MILWAUKEE, ST. PAUL AND PACIFIC RAILROAD TRACKS; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE NORTH 40°11'44" WEST A DISTANCE OF 126.24 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVE; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE ON A CURVE TO THE LEFT, THE CENTER OF WHICH BEARS SOUTH 49°48'16" WEST HAVING A RADIUS OF 1829.78 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 309.67 FEET THROUGH_A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 09°41'48"; THENCE NORTH 49 °53'32" WEST ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE A DISTANCE OF 167.07 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVE; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE ON A CURVE TO THE LEFT, THE CENTER OF WHICH BEARS SOUTH 40°06'28" WEST HAVING A RADIUS OF 1102.46 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 807.11- FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 41°56'46" TO A POINT OF COMPOUND CURVE; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE ON A CURVE TO THE LEFT, THE CENTER OF WHICH BEARS SOUTH 01°50'18" EAST HAVING A RADIUS OF 2790.19 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 659.24 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE' OF 13°32'14" TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. PARCEL C: THAT PORTION OF TRACT 25, RENTON SHORELANDS 2ND SUPPLEMENTAL; AND THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, AND THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 13, AND THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING•AT THE SOUTH QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 13; THENCE NORTH 00°58'28" EAST ALONG THE NORTH - SOUTH CENTERLINE OF SAID SECTION 13, A DISTANCE OF 884.84 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF TRACT 26 OF RENTON SHORELANDS SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL MAPS, 1958, AND THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 72°37'52" WEST ALONG THE SOUTH BOUNDARY OF SAID TRACT 26, A DISTANCE OF 382.60 FEET; THENCE NORTH 70°54'02" WEST ALONG THE SOUTH BOUNDARY OF SAID TRACT 26, A DISTANCE OF 73.51 FEET TO THE EAST 'LINE OF THE CHARLES BROWNELL DONATION LAND CLAIM NO. 41; THENCE NORTH 01°24'04" EAST ALONG SAID EAST LINE, A DISTANCE OF 950.58 FEET TO A LINE 35 FEET SOUTHERLY OF AND PARALLEL WITH THE CENTERLINE OF THE EXISTING MOST SOUTHERLY TRACK OF THE CHICAGO, MILWAUKEE, ST. PAUL AND PACIFIC RAILROAD TRACKS; THENCE ALONG SAID LINE 35 FEET SOUTHERLY OF AND PARALLEL WITH THE CENTERLINE OF THE MOST SOUTHERLY TRACK, ALONG A CURVE TO THE RIGHT, THE CENTER OF WHICH BEARS SOUTH 15°22'32" EAST, HAVING A RADIUS OF 2,790.19 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 659.24 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 13°32'14" . TO A POINT OF COMPOUND CURVE; THENCE ALONG A CURVE TO THE RIGHT, . ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE, THE CENTER OF WHICH BEARS SOUTH 01°50'18" EAST HAVING A RADIUS OF 1,102.46 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 807.11 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 41°56'46"; THENCE SOUTH 49°53'32" EAST, ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE, A DISTANCE OF 167.07 FEET; THENCE ALONG A CURVE TO THE RIGHT, ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE, HAVING A RADIUS OF 1,829.78 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 309.67 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 09°41'48"; THENCE LEAVING SAID PARALLEL LINE, SOUTH 40°11'44" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 126.24 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTH LINE OF THE BURLINGTON NORTHERN RAILROAD RIGHT OF WAY; THENCE ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT, ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE, THE CENTER OF WHICH BEARS NORTH 49°48'16" EAST HAVING A RADIUS OF 1,005.37 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 549.02 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 31°17'19" TO A POINT TANGENT ON SAID SOUTH LINE OF THE BURLINGTON NORTHERN RAILROAD RIGHT OF WAY; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE, SOUTH 71°29'03" EAST ALONG A LINE 50 FEET SOUTH OF AND PARALLEL WITH THE EXISTING SOUTHBOUND TRACT, A DISTANCE OF 826.56 FEET TO THE WEST LINE OF SAID SECTION 18; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE SOUTH 71°29'03" EAST,A DISTANCE OF 85.52 FEET TO THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTH 650 FEET OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 18; THENCE NORTH 89 °10'25" WEST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 18, A DISTANCE OF 81.57 FEET TO THE EAST LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 13; THENCE NORTH 88°15'00" WEST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTH 650 FEET OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 13, A DISTANCE OF 2,261.41 FEET TO AN ANGLE POINT ON THE SOUTH BOUNDARY OF TRACT 25 OF RENTON SHORE LANDS, 1958; THENCE _ NORTH 33°07'25" WEST ALONG SAID SOUTH BOUNDARY, A DISTANCE OF 154.51 FEET TO AN ANGLE POINT; THENCE NORTH 2 7°21'3 2" EAST ALONG SAID SOUTH BOUNDARY, A DISTANCE OF 387.32 FEET TO AN ANGLE POINT; THENCE NORTH 83°17'25" WEST ALONG SAID SOUTH BOUNDARY, A DISTANCE OF 171.17 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 46°22'22" WEST ALONG SAID SOUTH BOUNDARY, A DISTANCE OF 324.66 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 72°37'52" WEST ALONG SAID SOUTH BOUNDARY, A DISTANCE OF 76.33 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. SURVEY DISK #7 • BRH JOB #85235.05 APRIL 16, 1986 lc-Wu atcr-OSI-S-te CITY OF-R 2TOJ I� Li) FIRST CITY MAR 131987 EQUITIES BLJJLLNNQ/ZQNIN,G DEPT. 800 Fifth Avenue — Suite 4170 Seattle, Washington 98104 (206) 624-9223 TRANSMITTAL RECORD To: Mr. Fred Kaufman Date: March 12, 1987 Hearing Examiner City of Renton Project: BLACK, RIVER TECHNOLOGY PARK Mr. Larry Warren, Esq. City Attorney - — City of Renton The following are being forwarded herewith: • Agreement between First City Development Corp and the The City of Renton VIA COURIER 3/13/87 For Review/Comment Per Our Conversation For Review/Signature X For Your Information/File Remarks: Gentlemen: Per the Hearing Examiner's conditions #1 and #2 of site plan approval #SA-057-86, this agreement is being submitted to comply with Hearing Examiners conditions #1 and #2 of site plan approval rr#SA 057=gi' A final signed copy will be submitted for permit issuance on-Monday, March 16. cc: Don Erickson FIRST CITY EQUITIES Jeanette McKague ZaA., e Royce Berg i By: Barbara E. Moss Director of Planning sum oV 9� a'Cac� 2 gad�a5. o� µ a6t 9g�� yIAa - � r° 5 pa o,n 8 .... o 10 otie), a �.� auk �03 �Z •2�au� �' y �s so d I+ M a3aza as�a t�� - � goesbeyond oolle proposal. It clearly be the needs of Win© r�qu©stud variance is unnecessaryfor the subject the current site plan. Even if intended to serve a potential expansion, it remains unnecessary. Other issues such as required secondary access to interior parcels should be analyzed before any variance is approved. A complete plan for the site, either a plat dividing the property in the traditional manner or a binding site plan should be presented before a variance is approved. It is, therefore, premature to consider a variance for a cul-de-sac greater than 500 feet in length. DECISION The Site Plan is approved subject to the following conditions: 1. The execution of Restrictive Covenants providing an 80 foot wide reserve strip generally running the length of the entire 89 acre parcel, approximately 2,300 feet in length, and commencing in the vicinity of the extreme southeast corner of the subject site and terminating at the extreme southwest corner of the site, but not interfering with the greenbelt preserves. 2. The execution of Restrictive Covenants providing for participation in area wide traffic improvements not to exceed those contained within the traffic analysis for the project. 3 . Access road completion shall be subject to the approval of the Fire Department. Staff, in consultation with the City Attorney,may substitute methods other than covenants, if possible, to bind the land and applicant and which accomplish the above conditions. The Variance is denied. ORDERED THIS 13th day of August, 1986. (Cji.441- d FRED J. KAUFMAN HEARING EXAMINER TRANSMITTED THIS 13th day of August, 1986 to the parties of record: Barbara Moss First City Equities 800 Fifth Avenue Suite 4170 Seattle, Wa. 98104 . ,tea?; ^ , ram.., r--1 4L. 4e'.2' MEDIMI Z ,a • r` �,i'; 6-8 5►QA_pER 2L. 40-44' • O i ,. A `� SS sA SOME SIDEWALKS < 6L. 60-70'� • WINDING AND p� GOOD •" HILLY c u3 • 1+oRn+ i ALICI NT 4L, 4e' • 2L, 22' 1. SIDEWALKS S. 3rd S . FAIR SITU Vol t• 15 TOM BRIDGE 15 TON LIMIT t�� /�/,,i�: a ��,/��/ SunNt 0 �t StyS 2L. 20' 'S' ///1 ,/ Os 4L. 44-48' SILi 35 IwA PQAR !` /� �J/% %%%/ / 510EWALx5 O ,� GOOD i / �%/ /.,d. ' '��j��.' • FA IR-GOOD .� �i `� I W 7th" St. NA S c 11 i '{ •9 b / • c m ; T P&R Ay sic�ct P- 7 2L. 20-22 IS O\ • y • ; co �t• 0-2' DIRT SrLD. /• \ 35 • E m < : GOOD L.'. VERY POOR 6% r • t •' > • 9 apc 10E51Gt4 o I :; • ` .7-es I �pb .-SL. 4e-60' <1 % 20-22' !'a /sxia.�i •��' NO SIDEWALKS • t3R1� tiliAdvi, ilo' STq q� . GOOD NARROW tjR t ocf■ 1 :: k TF y`j Cln 20-22' t GRADY I � O • 1 SW 18th St. , ,n 1, '� 2L. 22' FrC /�t>' 4-WAY ( T SfLO. �Z 1 C STOP 0-2' SOF { a j ` p 1 FAIR "p SO0rh • • 2L. 20-22' o HOC• Cl Co�l•' et�A• • �, i < 6' GRAVEL S+iO. OPERATES AS A C 1 S�`�l 23 FPI{ FOLR-MAY-Sipe cc�ypR t-�05 ..158th St. POOR-vERr POOR ""-z-2...e.......... ' I 1e 1 4L FREEWAY • < • 1 I > l • t.,i: ' .•c GRADY WAY,WEST OF LIPD _ • W 44-46'_ - 20-22' l! : SCiT spLO. p 0-e' SIiDS K , •e'. MEDIAN LEGEND 40-SOPRi = 35 FPS{ GRADY WAY, LIFO TO RAINIER • 6-8' PAVED 5►LD. • :i •0-TOE. • \ 5, 5 MPH. iI O GOLn • FAIR-POOR 4-6L. • 9 •' . SIGNAL I SIDEWALKS j FA I R-GOD 1 • 1. 1 i STOP SIGN N 2L 2 LANs 3L. 36-40' 9 I• i': 1 to 50PE SIDEWALKS Sr11.0 StDULDER 35 MP►{ or -- GOOD-ExC. . BLACK RIVER Figure 3TR :`_. TECHNOLOGY STREET AND ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS PARK 1•,.7....„, . 7.... r...7 r....._, 7---- -_-_- ......____ _____ \ .....____ _______ . k- ,,,- • 31 7C' ` I.. 3 40 NORTH \}� 3 vs 2 \\ 35 5►-� y 26 �` • 6, 33� o 30 O 29 L PROJECT �P SITE ��� a 28 g i Rib _ f. // �` 36 / ^ Z7 `� 24 C:13=1 -`� '/ '' v ' / t. a. Q SW 7TH AVE r�i"'v„-.�.� 0 Q OAKSDALE A� SW N ' STArF�lyG� �y� w W { a ; '' (FLOORS TYPE S.F. J �.� • Z BLDG./ i W • 'i r" 24 1 STORY --.1' �° 3/1 STORIES OFFICE & R/D 140.000 O 0 ��V 25 26.650 �S 11 ; 26 1 STORY R/D 31.500 x ., c��� 1 27 3 STORIES OFFICE N i / --. � t' i 28 OFFICE 51,500 Q , / 4 STORIES 3 STORIES OFFICE 35,700 t ' 29 43.050 -F� - 30 3 STORIES OFFICE In '• ' 2 STORIES OFFICE 42,500 31 48.350 �L { 32 3 STORIES OFFICE 33 3 STORIES OFFICE 48.350 F., 2 STORIES OFFICE 42.500 . 34 35 2 STORIES OFFICE & R/D 62.800 �z P� `� _ ,� 107,600 36 3 STORIES OFFICE DO , H i ° - ' I-405 -- ti ., 4a i BLACK RIVER Figure 2 ' lwi TECHNOLOGY SITE PLAN 1 PARK /172' 4 • y CITY OF REN T ON R P, �(7 o N L7 1 L IF FIRST CITY MAR 131987 EQUITIES BUILDING/ZONING DEPT. 800 Fifth Avenue — Suite 4170 Seattle, Washington 98104 (206) 624-9223 TRANSMITTAL 'RECORD To: Mr. Fred Kaufman Date: March 12, 1987 Hearing Examiner City of Renton Project: BLACK RIVER TECHNOLOGY PARK ri Mr. Larry Warren, Esq. City Attorney City of Renton The following are being forwarded herewith: • Agreement between First City Development Corp and the The City of Renton VIA COURIER 3/13/87 For Review/Comment Per Our Conversation For Review/Signature X For Your Information/File s. Remarks: Gentlemen: Per the Hearing Examiner's conditions #1 and #2 of site plan approval #SA-057-86, this agreement is being submitted to comply with Hearing Examiners conditions #1 and #2 of site plan approval #SA-057-86. A final signed copy will be submitted for permit issuance on Monday, March 16. l; • • cc: Don Erickson FIRST CITY EQUITIES Jeanette McKague Royce Berg By: Barbara E. Moss Director of Planning CITY OF Ri C.i rE MAR 319e7 AGREEMENT L U!LD"NG/;LONIN(; DEPT. THIS AGREEMENT entered into as of this 8th day of December, 1986 between FIRST CITY DEVELOPMENTS CORP. , a Washington corporation, as nominee ("Owner") and the CITY OF RENTON, Washington, a Municipal Corporation ("City") . RECITALS A. Owner is the owner of the real property described in Exhibit 1 hereto (the "Property") B. Owner has applied for a Site Plan approval with respect to a portion of the Property under City File Numbers SA-057-86 and V-058-86 (the "Applications") . C. The City' s hearing examiner has recommended approval of the Applications, subject to certain conditions, including the Owner's execution of an agreement with the City placing certain restrictions with respect to a sixty (60) foot wide strip through the property. D. Owner is willing to enter into an agreement with the City to restrict such portion of the Property. NOW, THEREFORE,the parties covenant and agree as follows: 1. Owner agrees that it will not construct buildings or other structures within the sixty (60) foot wide section of the Property described in Exhibit 2 (the "Restricted Property") and that it will set aside and reserve the Restricted Property for Owner's ultimate construction ' thereon of a thirty six (36) foot wide roadway with twenty-four (24) feet of right-of-way meeting City standard and the dedication thereof to the City. 2 . Owner and City agree that the current description of the Restricted Property represents the parties current best estimate of the desired location for the roadway extension. The Restricted Property may be relocated by mutual agreement of the parties as reflected in an amendment to this Agreement. 3 . Owner further agrees that it will join in participating in area-wide traffic improvements not to exceed those contained in the Transportation Improvement Analysis for Black River Technical Park, dated June, 1986, prepared by The Transpo Group. (12/4/86) -1- 4 . The City acknowledges that this Agreement satisfies conditions 1 and 2 of the hearing examiners report on the Application, dated August 13, 1986. 5. The agreements contained herein shall run with the Property and be binding upon all parties having or acquiring any right, title or interest in the Property or any 'part thereof, unless released in writing by the parties. This Agreement can be amended by mutual agreement of the parties as reflected in a written amendment hereto. FIRST CITY DEVELOPMENTS CORP. ("OWNER") By Its By Its Accepted By: CITY OF .RENTON ("City") By Attest: City Clerk -2- /.�1�« ►/ct %E L/ND L O EXHIBIT #1 PARCEL A: THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; AND THAT PORTION OF JUNCTION ADDITION TO THE CITY OF SEATTLE, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 12 OF PLATS, PAGE..J5.,... IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; TOGETHER WITH VACATED STREETS ADJOINING WHICH WOULD ATTACH TO SAID PREMISES BY OPERATION OF LAW; AND OF C.E. BROWNELL'S DONATION CLAIM NO. 41 AND OF THAT PORTION OF TRACT 26, RENTON SHORELANDS 2ND SUPPLEMENTAL, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTH QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 13; THENCE NORTH 00°58 ' 28" EAST ALONG THE NORTH - SOUTH CENTERLINE OF SAID SECTION 13 A DISTANCE OF 884 .84 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF TRACT 26 OF RENTON SHORELANDS SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL MAPS, 1958; THENCE SOUTH 72°37 ' 52" WEST ALONG THE SOUTH BOUNDARY OF SAID TRACT 26 A DISTANCE OF 382.60 FEET; THENCE NORTH 70°54 ' 02" WEST ALONG SAID SOUTH BOUNDARY OF TRACT 26 A DISTANCE OF 73.50 FEET TO THE EAST LINE OF THE CHARLES BROWNELL DONATION LAND CLAIM NO. 41 AND THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING NORTH 70°54 ' 02" WEST ALONG SAID SOUTH BOUNDARY OF TRACT 26 A DISTANCE OF 281.02 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 73°56 ' O1" WEST ALONG SAID SOUTH BOUNDARY OF TRACT 26 A DISTANCE OF 130. 08 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 41°6 ' 07" WEST ALONG SAID SOUTH BOUNDARY OF TRACT 26 A DISTANCE OF 316..18 FEET TO THE NORTH BOUNDARY OF A TRACT OF LAND DEEDED TO KING COUNTY AND DESCRIBED UNDER KING COUNTY RECORDING NUMBER 6607786; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG SAID NORTH BOUNDARY ON A CURVE TO THE LEFT, THE CENTER OF WHICH BEARS SOUTH 39°41'39" WEST HAVING A RADIUS OF 627.46 FEET AN ARC DISTANCE OF 434.70 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 39 °41'39"; THENCE NORTH A DISTANCE OF 25.00 FEET ALONG SAID NORTH BOUNDARY; THENCE WEST A DISTANCE OF 280.69 FEET ALONG• SAID NORTH BOUNDARY; THENCE SOUTH 59°53 ' 47" WEST ALONG SAID NORTH BOUNDARY DISTANCE OF 377. 52 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 74°13 '19" WEST ALONG SAID NORTH BOUNDARY A DISTANCE OF 443.31 FEET TO THE NORTHERLY MARGIN OF THE CHARLES MONSTER COUNTY ROAD, THENCE NORTH 34°18'31" WEST ALONG SAID NORTHERLY MARGIN A DISTANCE OF 43 .46 FEET TO THE SOUTH LINE OF THE BURLINGTON NORTHERN RAILROAD RIGHT OF WAY; THENCE ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT, ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE, THE CENTER OF WHICH BEARS NORTH 06°34 ' 41" WEST HAVING A RADIUS OF 696.00 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 45.43 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 03°44 '25" TO A POINT OF COMPOUND. CURVE; THENCE ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT, ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE, I THE CENTER OF WHICH BEARS NORTH 10°19 ' 06" WEST HAVING A RADIUS OF 1,055.00 FEET AN ARC DISTANCE OF 209.95 FEET THROUGH A ' CENTRAL ANGLE OF 11°24 ' 08" TO A POINT OF COMPOUND CURVE; THENCE ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT, ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE, THE CENTER OF WHICH BEARS NORTH 21°43 '14" WEST HAVING A RADIUS OF 727.00 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 214.77 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 16°55' 35" TO A POINT OF COMPOUND CURVE; THENCE ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT, ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE,THE CENTER OF WHICH BEARS NORTH 38 °38'49" WEST HAVING A RADIUS OF 1,571.00 FEET AN ARC DISTANCE OF 206.57 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 07°32'02" TO A POINT OF TANGENCY; THENCE NORTH 43°49'09" EAST ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE A DISTANCE OF 97.17 FEET TO A LINE 35 FEET SOUTHERLY OF AND PARALLEL WITH THE CENTERLINE OF THE EXISTING MOST SOUTHERLY TRACK OF THE CHICAGO, MILWAUKEE, ST. PAUL AND PACIFIC RAILROAD TRACKS; THENCE ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE ON A CURVE TO THE RIGHT, THE CENTER OF WHICH BEARS SOUTH 42°43'18" EAST HAVING A RADIUS OF 696.89 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 40.09 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 03 °17'45"; THENCE NORTH 50 °34'27" EAST ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE A DISTANCE OF 248.50 FEET; THENCE ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE ON A CURVE TO THE RIGHT, THE CENTER OF WHICH BEARS SOUTH 39 °25'33" EAST HAVING A RADIUS OF 676.58: FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 93.64 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 07°55'47" TO A POINT OF REVERSE CURVE; THENCE ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE ON A CURVE TO THE LEFT, THE CENTER OF WHICH BEARS NORTH 31°29'46" WEST HAVING A RADIUS OF 428.64 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 73.32 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 09°48'04" TO -A POINT OF REVERSE CURVE; THENCE ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE ON A CURVE TO THE RIGHT, THE CENTER OF WHICH BEARS SOUTH 41°17'50" EAST HAVING A RADIUS OF 2,580.74 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 437.40 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 09°42'39" TO A POINT OF COMPOUND CURVE; THENCE ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE ON A CURVE TO THE RIGHT, THE CENTER OF WHICH BEARS SOUTH 31°3 5'll" EAST HAVING A RADIUS OF 2,790.19 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 789.44 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 16°12'39" TO THE EAST LINE OF THE CHARLES BROWNELL DONATION LAND CLAIM NO. 41; THENCE SOUTH 01°24'04" WEST ALONG SAID EAST LINE A DISTANCE OF 950.58 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. PARCEL B: THAT PORTION OF C.E. BROWNELL'S DONATION CLAIM NO. 41, AND OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER AND THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTH QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 13; THENCE NORTH 00°58'28" EAST ALONG THE NORTH - SOUTH CENTERLINE OF SAID SECTION 13 A DISTANCE OF 884.84 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF TRACT 26 OF RENTON SHORELANDS SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL MAPS, 1958; THENCE SOUTH 72°37'52" WEST ALONG THE SOUTH BOUNDARY OF SAID TRACT 26 A DISTANCE OF 382.60 FEET; THENCE NORTH 70°54'02" WEST ALONG SAID SOUTH BOUNDARY OF TRACT 26 A DISTANCE OF 73.50 FEET TO THE EAST LINE OF THE CHARLES BROWNELL DONATION LAND CLAIM NO. 41; THENCE NORTH 01°24'04" EAST ALONG SAID EAST LINE OF THE CHARLES BROWNELL DONATION LAND CLAIM NO. 41 A DISTANCE OF 950.58 FEET TO A LINE 35 FEET SOUTHERLY OF AND PARALLEL WITH THE CENTERLINE OF THE EXISTING MOST SOUTHERLY TRACK OF THE CHICAGO, MILWAUKEE, ST. PAUL AND PACIFIC RAILROAD TRACKS AND THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE ON A CURVE TO THE LEFT, THE CENTER OF WHICH BEARS SOUTH 15°22'32" EAST HAVING A RADIUS OF 2,790.19 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 789.44 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 16°12'39" TO A POINT OF COMPOUND CURVE; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE ON A CURVE.TO THE LEFT, THE CENTER OF WHICH BEARS SOUTH 31°35'11" EAST HAVING A RADIUS OF 2580.74 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 437.40 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 09°42'39" TO A POINT OF REVERSE CURVE; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE ON A CURVE TO THE RIGHT, THE CENTER OF WHICH BEARS NORTH .41°17'50" WEST HAVING A RADIUS OF 428.64 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 73 .32 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 09°48'04" TO A POINT OF REVERSE CURVE; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE ON A CURVE TO THE LEFT, THE CENTER OF WHICH BEARS SOUTH 31°29'46" EAST HAVING A RADIUS OF 676.58 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 93;64''"FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 07°55'47" TO A POINT OF TANGENCY; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE SOUTH 50°34'27" WEST A DISTANCE OF 248.50 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVE; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE ON A CURVE TO THE LEFT, THE CENTER OF WHICH BEARS SOUTH 39°25'33" EAST HAVING A RADIUS OF 696.89 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 40.09 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 03°17'45" TO THE SOUTH LINE OF THE BURLINGTON NORTHERN RAILROAD RIGHT OF WAY; THENCE NORTH 43°49'09" EAST ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE A DISTANCE OF 173.83 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVE; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE ON A CURVE TO THE RIGHT, THE CENTER OF WHICH BEARS SOUTH 46°10'51" EAST HAVING A RADIUS OF 4030.00 FEET, AN , ARC DISTANCE OF 197.57 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 02 ° 4 8 '3 2" TO A POINT OF COMPOUND CURVE; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE ON A CURVE TO THE RIGHT, THE CENTER OF WHICH BEARS SOUTH 43°22'19" EAST HAVING A RADIUS OF 1853.00 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 194.75 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 06 ° 01'18" TO A POINT OF COMPOUND CURVE; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE ON A CURVE TO THE RIGHT, THE CENTER OF WHICH BEARS SOUTH 37°21'01" EAST HAVING A RADIUS OF 10543.00 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 186.51 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF, 01°00'49" TO A POINT OF COMPOUND CURVE; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE ON A CURVE TO THE RIGHT, THE CENTER OF WHICH BEARS SOUTH 36°20'12" EAST HAVING A RADIUS OF 1657.00 FEET AN ARC DISTANCE OF 193.93 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 06 ° 42'20" TO A POINT OF COMPOUND CURVE; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE ON A CURVE TO THE RIGHT, THE CENTER OF WHICH BEARS SOUTH 29°37'52" EAST HAVING A RADIUS OF 6738.00 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 197.76 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF,, 01° 4 0'5 4" TO A POINT OF COMPOUND CURVE; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE ON A CURVE TO THE RIGHT, THE CENTER OF WHICH BEARS SOUTH 27°56'58" EAST HAVING A RADIUS OF 1768.00 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 194.45 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 06 °18 ' 06" TO A. POINT OF COMPOUND CURVE; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE ON A CURVE TO THE RIGHT, THE CENTER OF WHICH BEARS SOUTH 21°38'52" EAST HAVING A RADIUS OF 8603.00 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 204.54 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 01 °21'44" TO A POINT OF COMPOUND CURVE; . THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE ON A CURVE TO THE RIGHT, THE CENTER OF WHICH BEARS SOUTH 20°17'08" EAST HAVING A RADIUS OF 1922.10 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 178.79 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 05°19'46" TO A POINT OF COMPOUND CURVE ON THE EAST LINE OF SAID CHARLES BROWNELL DONATION LAND CLAIM NO. 41; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE ON A CURVE TO THE RIGHT, THE CENTER OF WHICH BEARS SOUTH 14°57'22" EAST HAVING A RADIUS OF 2814.93 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 659.42 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 13 ° 25'19" TO A POINT OF COMPOUND CURVE; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE ON A CURVE TO THE RIGHT, THE CENTER OF WHICH BEARS SOUTH 01°32'03" EAST HAVING A RADIUS OF 1165.09 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 1097.05 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 53°57'00" TO A POINT OF TANGENCY; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE SOUTH 37°35'03" EAST A DISTANCE OF 308.70 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVE; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE ON A CURVE TO THE LEFT, THE CENTER OF WHICH BEARS NORTH 52°24'57" EAST HAVING A RADIUS OF 1005.37 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 45.82 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 02 °36' 41: TO - A LINE 35 FEET SOUTHERLY OF AND PARALLEL WITH THE CENTERLINE OF THE EXISTING MOST SOUTHERLY TRACK OF THE CHICAGO, MILWAUKEE, ST. PAUL AND PACIFIC RAILROAD TRACKS; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE NORTH 40°11'44" WEST A DISTANCE OF 126.24 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVE; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE ON A CURVE TO THE LEFT, THE CENTER OF WHICH BEARS SOUTH 49°48'16" WEST HAVING A RADIUS OF 1829.78 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 309.67 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 09°41'48"; THENCE NORTH 49 °53'32" WEST ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE A DISTANCE OF 167.07 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVE; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE ON A CURVE TO THE LEFT, THE CENTER OF WHICH BEARS SOUTH 40 °06'28" WEST HAVING A RADIUS OF 1102.46 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 807.11 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 41°56'46" TO A POINT OF COMPOUND CURVE; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE ON A CURVE TO THE LEFT, THE CENTER OF WHICH BEARS SOUTH 01°50'18" EAST HAVING A RADIUS OF 2790.19 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 659.24 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 13°32'14" TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. PARCEL C: THAT PORTION OF TRACT 25, RENTON SHORELANDS 2ND SUPPLEMENTAL; AND THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, AND THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 13, AND THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING •AT THE SOUTH QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 13; THENCE NORTH 00°58'28" EAST ALONG THE NORTH - SOUTH CENTERLINE OF SAID SECTION 13, A DISTANCE OF 884.84 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF TRACT 26 OF RENTON SHORELANDS SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL MAPS, 1958, AND THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 72°37'52" WEST ALONG THE SOUTH BOUNDARY OF SAID TRACT 26, A DISTANCE OF 382.60 FEET; THENCE NORTH 70°54'02" WEST ALONG THE SOUTH BOUNDARY OF SAID TRACT 26, A DISTANCE OF 73.51 FEET TO THE EAST LINE OF THE CHARLES BROWNELL DONATION LAND CLAIM NO. 41; . THENCE NORTH 01°24'04" EAST ALONG SAID EAST LINE, A DISTANCE OF 950.58 FEET TO A LINE 35 FEET SOUTHERLY OF AND PARALLEL WITH THE CENTERLINE OF THE EXISTING MOST SOUTHERLY TRACK OF THE CHICAGO, MILWAUKEE, ST. PAUL AND PACIFIC RAILROAD TRACKS; THENCE ALONG SAID LINE 35 FEET SOUTHERLY OF AND PARALLEL WITH THE CENTERLINE OF THE MOST SOUTHERLY TRACK, ALONG A CURVE TO THE RIGHT, THE CENTER OF WHICH BEARS SOUTH 15°22'32" EAST, HAVING A RADIUS OF 2,790.19 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 659.24 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 13°32'14" . TO A POINT OF COMPOUND CURVE; THENCE ALONG A CURVE TO THE RIGHT, ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE, THE CENTER OF WHICH BEARS SOUTH 01°50'18" EAST HAVING A RADIUS OF 1,102.46 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 807.11 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 41°56'46"; THENCE SOUTH 49°53'32" EAST, ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE, A DISTANCE OF 167.07 FEET; THENCE ALONG A CURVE TO THE RIGHT, ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE, HAVING A RADIUS OF 1,829.78 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 309.67 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 09 °41'48"; THENCE LEAVING SAID PARALLEL LINE, SOUTH 40°11'44" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 126.24 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTH LINE OF THE BURLINGTON NORTHERN RAILROAD RIGHT OF WAY; THENCE ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT, ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE, THE CENTER OF WHICH BEARS NORTH 49 °48'16" EAST HAVING A RADIUS OF 1,005.37 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 549.02 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 31°17'19" TO A POINT TANGENT ON SAID SOUTH LINE OF THE BURLINGTON NORTHERN RAILROAD RIGHT OF WAY; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE, SOUTH 71°29'03" EAST ALONG A LINE 50 FEET SOUTH OF AND PARALLEL WITH THE EXISTING SOUTHBOUND TRACT, A DISTANCE OF 826.56 FEET TO THE WEST LINE OF SAID SECTION 18; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE SOUTH 71°29'03" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 85.52 FEET TO THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTH 650 FEET OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 18; THENCE NORTH 89 °10'25" WEST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 18, A DISTANCE OF 81.57 FEET TO THE EAST LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 13; THENCE NORTH 88°15'00" WEST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTH 650 FEET OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 13, A DISTANCE OF 2,261.41 FEET TO AN ANGLE POINT ON THE SOUTH BOUNDARY OF TRACT 25 OF RENTON SHORE LANDS, 1958; THENCE _ NORTH 33°07'25" WEST ALONG SAID SOUTH BOUNDARY, A DISTANCE OF 154.51 FEET TO AN ANGLE POINT; THENCE NORTH 2 7 °21'32" EAST ALONG SAID SOUTH BOUNDARY, A DISTANCE OF 387.32 FEET TO AN ANGLE POINT; THENCE NORTH 83°17'25" WEST ALONG SAID SOUTH BOUNDARY, A DISTANCE OF 171.17 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 46°22'22" WEST ALONG SAID SOUTH BOUNDARY, A DISTANCE OF 324.66 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 72°37'52" WEST ALONG SAID SOUTH BOUNDARY, A DISTANCE OF 76.33 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. SURVEY DISK #7 BRH JOB #85235.05 APRIL 16, 1986 • BUS 2OED & HITCHINGS. INc. • EXHIBIT #2 NACHES AVENUE SOUTHWEST (TOTAL 60' RIGHT-OF-WAY IN BLACK RIVER CORPORATE PARK) : THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTH HALF OF SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, LYING WITHIN 30.00 FEET ON EACH SIDE OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED CENTERLINE: BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTH 650.00 FEET OF SAID SECTION 13 WHICH IS NORTH 88°15'00" WEST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE 1626.50 FEET FROM THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID SECTION 13; THENCE NORTH 1 °45'00" EAST 225.00 FEET; THENCE ON A CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF 853.34 FEET A DISTANCE OF 209.55 FEET; THENCE NORTH 12°19'12" WEST 329.69 FEET; THENCE ON A CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF 600.00 FEET A DISTANCE OF 724.11 FEET TO A LINE WHICH IS PARALLEL WITH AND 55.00 FEET SOUTHERLY, WHEN MEASURED RADIALLY FROM THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF THE CHICAGO, MILWAUKEE, ST. PAUL AND PACIFIC RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE 2082.08 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 46°10'35" WEST 301.71 FEET TO A POINT WHICH IS 54.10 FEET WHEN MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES TO THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID CHICAGO, MILWAUKEE, ST. PAUL AND PACIFIC RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY; THENCE SOUTH 43 °49'09" WEST PARALLEL WITH SAID SOUTHERLY LINE 254.90 FEET; THENCE ON A CURVE TO LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF 250.00 FEET A DISTANCE OF 143.00 FEET, MORE OR LESS TO THE NORTH BOUNDARY OF A TRACT OF LAND DEEDED TO KING COUNTY BY DEED RECORDED UNDER AUDITOR'S FILE NO. 6607786, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY AND THE END OF SAID CENTERLINE DESCRIPTION. FIRST CITY EQUITIES BLACK RIVER CORPORATE PARK NOVEMBER 17, 1986 BRH NO. 86114.01 SURVEY DISK 12 /aF �, au ' / (C: ;;- `; GASTER J4 aa' `Mt'41 t..N0 SJp` *°! Y[ ir] FIRST CITY ii 17 1.. L. ,. .w. EQUITIES 800 Fifth Avenue — Suite 4170 Seattle, Washington 98104 (206) 624-9223 TRANSMITTAL RECORD To: Mr. Fred Kaufman Date: March 12, 1987 Hearing Examiner City of Renton Project: BLACK RIVER TECHNOLOGY PARK Mr. Larry Warren, Esq. City Attorney City of Renton The following are being forwarded herewith: - Agreement between First City Development Corp and the The City of Renton VIA COURIER 3/13/87 For Review/Comment Per Our Conversation For Review/Signature X For Your Information/File Remarks: Gentlemen: Per the Hearing Examiner's conditions #1 and #2 of site plan approval #SA-057-86, this agreement is being submitted to comply with Hearing Examiners conditions #1 and #2 of site plan approval #SA-057-86. A final signed copy will be submitted for permit issuance on Monday, March 16. cc: Don Erickson FIRST CITY EQUITIES Jeanette McKague / --4A-- Royce Berg By: Barbara E. Moss Director of Planning �� 3a ��xa eg�oe- off �a�S 5�aga� 986L �8 g3.N 9 10 uo ote0, Va a�� t �Ze �� 50 r S .tea gog ,tr3 ►`d • •�e� a�a es,has Ru 4ob'a r4, roquooted variance is unnecessary for the subject proposal. It clearly goes beyond the needs of the current site plan. Even if intended to serve a potential expansion, it remains unnecessary. Other issues such as required secondary access to interior parcels should be analyzed before any variance is approved. A complete plan for the site, either a plat dividing the property in the traditional manner or a binding site plan should be presented before a variance is approved. It is, therefore, premature to consider a variance for a cul-de-sac greater than 500 feet in length. DECISION The Site Plan is approved subject to the following conditions: 1. The execution of Restrictive Covenants providing an 80 foot wide reserve strip generally running the length of the entire 89 acre parcel, approximately 2, 300 feet in length, and commencing in the vicinity of the extreme southeast corner of the subject site and terminating at the extreme southwest corner of the site, but not interfering with the greenbelt preserves. 2 . The execution of Restrictive Covenants providing for participation in area-wide traffic improvements not to exceed those contained within the traffic analysis for the project. 3 . Access road completion shall be subject to the approval of the Fire Department. Staff, in consultation with the City Attorney,may substitute methods other than covenants, if possible, to bind the land and applicant and which accomplish the above conditions. The Variance is denied. ORDERED THIS 13th day of August, 1986. FRED J. KAUFMAN HEARING EXAMINER TRANSMITTED THIS 13th day of August, 1986 to the parties of record: Barbara Moss First City Equities 800 Fifth Avenue Suite 4170 Seattle, Wa. 98104. I µ.. 4e'. 2' KEDIAN z I'I ''1 '�i SS MPT7 2L. 40-44' D O A MINDING AND s2 6-8' SrOJLOER , o SO€ SIDEWALKS < cc �• 60_70' 1: NORTH HILLY C N AL I P•tAIT 4L. 4 B' a I2L. 22' SIDEWALKS �.. S. 3rd $l, i _ PROJECT Goan-EXC. .. t FAIR BITS `�d. ( NARROW BRIDGE di - I 15 TON LIMIT - Suf10•t 0 tt k. 60' • 2L. 20' S. SIDEWALKS POOR 9L //� •I/�!`/��?7 411! SIOEWALKS � i� 3000a • // /i/�// " 1/����ill. FAiR�iOOD �O to `�� I SW 7th St. 01 .� S. • • fj Q ` f7 °• `�/0\ /� ° ���/// PER `st • y 2L. 20-22' E co p -iv' 1; G\p0y I ODE O-2' DIRT SMLD. S ¢ \ . •s a < i GOOD \ VERY POOit 4\O I O. 1 t- < l�� St s . .. 53 - 4O' DESIGN 1 0l4. ,� f ...• 1 .7-82 1LPDER III 4-SL. 40-60' a '% 20-22' t-Ao 03 6 �y"�'°''isy N0 S I DEYALKS ° '20. . EFI I C.... . _ elliver_.. •-•--- qplySTgT t G000 NARROW BR10C�■ ),O.. lk - i .L e G r I17 20-22' 1 GRADY I • ` $W. 16th St. « "J ' '� �4, 4-MAY I Ilik2L. 22' 1-4 I , n. . S �•� C STOP I 0 2' SOFT S.iO.� S O If1 FAIR �O 7 \4 i L. 0`I'C•nf�� g\V d. ��? �� ; < e,GRAVEL,S+tO. OPERATES AS A ry I. Co jIli f . 9 2S KPM FOIR-WAY-STOP 0 i OJj • 11� 1,�0 �.,t$Bth St. POOR-VERY POOR a-2- E:1.1."' S ' 1 i I k FaEEVAY 1 1 L 4 GRADY tlAV,tc£ST aF LIhD c ge o 6L. 44-48' Z ' W .p[ 2L, 20-22 . SOFT SHLD. 6 0-e' SI'9_DS. 1 AL. •6' . IEDIAN :' LEGEND 40-50aPH+ �. 3S ►prl �tADV WAY, Lire TO RAINIER — ` p 6-6' PAVED S'LD. yi GOOD 470 FAIR-POrJR 4-6L, 40-70•' 1 Y ` SS ►Rt. O SIGNAL , a ;`- i • 1 SIDEWALKS �.1 .b STOP SIGN co FAIR-GOOD +� t 2l 2 LANES 3L. 36-40' N 13 . 1 SHLD SHOUL • DER w SOME SIDEWALKS 35 ►P►+ O • . w CLOD-EXC. c is . BLACK RIVER Figure 3 TECHNOLOGY If PARK STREET AND ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS l'i , • . (,I f' fj �, 34 `, \ {•I • Q �/ [� � 31 ��'� { tF1 � 32 ��. t` / p r. 35 33� O 30 y v. 26 • • 6 c�Ro�ECT ':' ITE ./ a28/ ' Q2 I�•• 36 �, / I� EU 27 24�1��\ • Q SW 7TH AVE 9q -as -- 3 STgT�,o y� ^{ , cn �, 1 ray a ? v • BLDG.• •FLOORS TYPE S.F. J � ',- .. J �, I • 24 1 STORY R/O 20.500 til -•I c•-s'y i 25 3/1 STORIES OFFICE I. Ft/0 140.000 • O • �c, II. 26.65U 0 0_ 26 1 STORY RID c7�. OFFICE 31.500 N 27 3 STORIES 51.500 Wore,---- l' 28 4 STORIES OFFICE , 29 3 STORIES OFFICE 35.700 p = h I 30 3 STORIES OFFICE 43.050 '" `` 2 STORIES OFFICE 42.500 m d. 31 48.350{. 32 3 STORIES OFFICE 74 $ 1 •.!. 33 3 STORIES OFFICE 48.350 0 - d " OFFICE 42.500 N ', x ' ' { 34 2 STORIES 1— . !i t{ • 35 2 STORIES OFFICE C. R/D 62.800 I! i 36 3 STORIES OFFICE 107.600 — 4P . i 1-405 c- BLACK RIVER Figure 21141 TECHNOLOGY SITE PLAN (G} • ! •• ; PARK - - ai r 3253Z NOTICE OF PENDING SITE PLAN APPROVAL RENTON, WASHINGTON A SITE PLAN APPLICATION HAS BEEN FILED AND ACCEPTED WITH THE BUILDING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT. THE FOLLOWING BRIEFLY DESCRIBES THE APPLICATION AND THE NECESSARY PUBLIC APPROVALS: DESCRIPTION: SA-057-86, V-058-86 Application for site plan approval to allow the-construction of a two-story building haveing 93,170 square feet for office, manufacturing and warehouse uses, and variance application to allow a CUL-DE-SAC Road length over 500 feet. GENERAL LOCATION: Located on the east side of Naches Avenue S.W. at the 500 Block. PUBLIC APPROVALS: Site Plan Approval Variance Building Permit The application can be reviewed at the Building and Zoning' Department located on the third floor of City Hall. Comments will be accepted anytime prior to public hearings and during public hearings. For further information on the application or dates of final action by the City, please contact the Building and Zoning Department at 235-2550. CERTIFICATION I, JERRY F. LIND, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THREE COPIES OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENTS WERE POSTED BY ME IN THREE CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED ABOVE AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW. ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a Notary-Public, in and for the State of Washington ,,,,,, residing in FFnl-r`QN �Q,F,S C. @ , on the y TN day of �� ` 'p�j9, ��o�'�y 9 . �1,0;e ..._. Qp0Ael.p..-0 ( • SIGNED:vit * _ c�s'1.1MA I efe.:*) w .0"‹y °F WASN���v ILSZEF szx�musx m=cros.”7 Cl''' EI: UTES November 19, 1986 Ms. Jeanette Samack-McKague 1 D ' N@,' �� E CITY OF RENTON Building Department NOV 1 s lge6 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, WA 98055 BUILDING/ZONING U6PT, RE: ADMAC Building Permit BLACKRIVER CORPORATE PARK Dear Jeanette: Per our telephone conversation of yesterday, enclosed please find the Exhibit 1 (legal description of the Blackriver Technology Park property) and Exhibit 2 (the 60 foot wide right-of-way legal description) . Also enclosed is the boundary and topographic survey prepared by BRH dated 5/19/86 with revision date of 5/30/86 on which is outlined the 60 foot proposed roadway throughout the Blackriver Park for Naches Avenue as currently proposed. • By copy of this letter I am forwarding those exhibits as well as maps to Fred Kaufman and to the City Attorney, Larry Warren. (Larry' s maps will be coming under separate cover directly from Bush, Roed, and Hitchings. ) If this agreement is acceptable to all parties, please advise me and Mr. Jim Hansen, of the Building Department, in order for my • • • 800 Fifth Avenue•Suite 4170•Seattle,Washington 98104 (206)624-9223 Real Estate Development and Investments l Ms. Jeanette Samack-McKague November 18, 1986 i Page Two ADMAC Building Permit to be issued. We are ready to begin construction on that property and appreciate your review and comments as soon as possible. Warm regards, FIRST CITY EQUITIES Barbara E. Moss Director of Planning BEM:bc Enclosures cc: Royce Berg Robert Roed Greg Byler Fred Kaufman w/encl. Larry Warren 0 • ?A•✓. \" . Two.1�. .i . I ... ,�,ce y. .i. • .� .0, t •i I, '1;.-. .V1h ,_;`K.'. ,1•( r•.1,^f.ea� he-..;-1y•,..r�'•v 6•. •",3f4a-"'•''.,,,�i'' t}�'i v^'8v'•-.az: ..., .•y idh i.'6.,, �' ®C F`ad:1 •\• t`. �i, 'y,...;av ..7 ,.y-2 aL...„,;•- <Y;71;C1i::".,.1 •�',w\-,`',..11 6.i 4 h '•%it'•• •P,..,, `a:,- `. '`�- :•'„k •.-.4 1, �`d. ti4' fir` ` .fie' ; b ! :' �}:t •.t .o a`, 6. a q .`\\ Tv '��l r�,{ k ..•ir:��'._'r ° A�aA+'�r'.. X`�n's;�, k � 9�,.�y ..-y•>•.;l" •�.l P�'ll'1f -l•,:5"ph-=•�':l '� 1\ ` . ''s F.yri `°e.:{ ti: i :r: r.+b•' • }+�t'..�;t:9 '_` ;:'fa'iit.j,•.°•'a :t l-;l- . � `�4 ti 'Z t - .� • ��•. K_. a.,a('r7� � ' y.�', i./ pZ, 4 ��� 4 .e.. fir 6+� '� �,W:.: .�' u y j'k�.r4 �:��="r. tif. _•i!!•F� ��,•r,�7"•S�t7,: ,� �f3�o •�4 " i c'.,. � �'�-.Fj a•.., � .°_ ��, ''. l`yI.-2��{�hr•2-54 -•�XSS'�: J .s1'r C'°PY'. , , .y1..-*A r; �, .°rX•,,�' '• -•e x--,4y ,%V' '. t..- ,�, --�"„ 'i+^•T7•�"�'� °rr'sr h� � �n,A�ti .�°E.rsF+ 't $.u� � .��l.•2K Y. ( '°fd ®. C 1 l J:--2 ' : ~1f'-� �.` ''" •,.y a �y,',' �" ',:,,: t. � — If:,4,.'M.� r•,�` �3p. ',a(��ter,! , ,\ o, �I 1 0 \ .j±` '4ri ,�, v`{N; ..�r -•.Y' r '4 ed'j_ •" °1 rt,...,1N, a•fr x,?' 7.eg j4 '/r• ..t• 3C, F '!9 �TZ'tie- •rVo tl S• ,p A. ++'`d `'• ., ,�t_ -1 `a A *IL r. L •4'..,1? •r� r.'.. "3°x' '".0 a W a ga^: �,-: t h• ``v` �,, tM,i ,;x {�c;,.,i""�' „a;.t' ?'�%r�,��,�t9 .r i�cr-�.'s, 'R >����• k•4,'�a• ��@;� s�r » ,.. - . ,, Y 7 Y . r .*? �A r.? 41.4 ` - g L 'ter °'Y� Al ' j .:. Zy ..0%A'..,4. fry TI , x, V. ., 1 - , .*ate"",°1 &�~ • :. -. •" ..." r ct9 ' elU1L9'� GI ; EXHIBIT I . a Blackriver Technology Park Page 3 Exhibit 'A' • i Ordm_ No. 652499 1:, DESCRIPTION FOR PARCEL 1: PARCEL 1-A: That portion of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 13. Township 23 North. Range 4 East W.M. ; AND 1 That portion of Junction Addition to the City of Seattle, as 1 per plat recorded in Volume 12 of Plats. Page 75. records of King County; TOGETHER WITH vacated streets adjoining which would attach to ' t i said premises by operation of law; ea AND of Charles Brownell's Donation Claim No. 41; • •• u9 c AND of that portion of Tract 26 of Renton Shore Lands 2nd '• Supplemental described as follows: 0 . . - ,® Beginning at the South 1/4 corner of said Section 13; •. CD thence North 00'58'28" East along the North -•South centerline . - of said Section 13 a distance of 884.84 feet to the Southeast . : • corner of Tract 26 of Renton Snorelands Second Supplemental Maps, according to the unrecorded plat thereof; thence South 72'37'52'° West along the South boundary of said `A Tract 26 a distance of 382.60 feet; thence North 70°54'02" West along said South boundary of Tract 26 a distance of 73.50 feet to the East line of the Charles Brownell • • Donation Land Claim No. 41 and the true point of beginning; • thence continuing North 70'54'02" West along said South boundary of Tract 26 a distance of 281.02 feet; -• thence South 73°56'O1" West along said South boundary of Tract 26 • • a distance of 130.08 feet; thence South 41'16'07" West along said South boundary of Tract 26 S • a distance of 316.18 feet to the North boundary of a tract of land 1 deeded to King County and described under. King County Recording `' No. 6607786: a thence Westerly along said North boundary on a curve to the left. t the center of which bears South 39'41'39 ' West having a radius - 1 of 627.46 feet an arc distance of 434.70 feet through a central angle of 39'41'39"; thence North a distance of 25.00 feet along the ,North boundary • '• of said King County tract; thence West a distance of 280.69 feet along the North boundary; of said King County tract; thence South 59°53'47" West along said North boundary a distance • ' of 377.52 feet; thence South 74'13'19" West along said North boundary a distance • of 443.31 feet to the Northerly margin of the Charles Monster County Road; i ofenc 43e46orth feet3tolthelSouthtlineng ofsaid Northerly the Burlingtonmargin a Nor distance Northern Railroad • • right-of-way; • + thence along a curve to the left along said South line. the center of which bears North 06'34'41" West having a radius of 696.00 feet, I - continued - t • ' a w !srsr' "�=` ' . • a �7� tn- t. .tie 'C+a �'• ' --:,. Filed A y. u r -m-. �i ��.,.+_ �',�lq• -t•;• e';.�" ,�j:,..H r:�. T . • +. a i �r, �� i • -',•'I..." ,?"��:r te s -t.,;q _�,:-. :�• :�t•.,.. 1,a'-, -a- • °y'. 1��1y �p J 'p;•C."r'.,j �'a' F,e.i v �.r.,. • � wN ,.,-a b. ' • "i^�.-4:,. :1 a}1.,� .1:41: '`5�:.•.. -1,. i..... (w�,.y. ir;p y'S. .`' rt drip.»�tid,�.'�-`v.-'b� . 1r ti �Sa a•-..tt3 rP,«.,r+- '».ir` x.p:e, %�• ?.or Cr A ?.".';�i', `��i.• �'' S `t,� �, epJ fi "., 7. tiff 't _ $ t y •1'=•' .� i�t G I;,w uzf,�. 'i,� .'"• fl4 ' a,i;••:P i.�r" Ns'=+�'�•£.-'r1;.,,,:aj N:J"w•V,..;., 4`.far ,a{`r.p,. 7 4s•'vr,v,,,7z.T.,y p y':.p • • "Si,.y- {c 5 o• '' 'r�1 .�:40•, s'•4G 1��f:;•�t';• .}ri:'.�•-. •t ,�;,��.',�,Ji. • ,..r.a+ �.���"P.,a?+'V.-•.•'+�y"�:"`S +1 r�•a,`J7 :v{aa'ti {Yw • •Qr. 4,...'J �1 i ?- l_ -.. 1`0 T`,4`,' :q.. q'.:;f' '1 T,. $�►�t,'r ✓' �14i h.:P-«iS,cro'j :.', ),• `1.z,- �2Jr '�- �+P^` r;ti :.i r 9- .,:.,1:1;'+1i - „'."pr,' 'f'W'.,:.f "9.y.01. ,r.:•`. ^W a.�. tea, r+ Yi'• r5i �''� .,,,T� • ;,. ;44 , ^< •�` 'fin` Z: ,.'1"�''?T: - :t,'r gay" v r;� ;y;•r£'-ir Y,:tip t:t t'ii la,, -::1,i; t¢ �: ��T�.. •1 «. c...c'"i „�'^:�Y"i� .Q. �'��•1��` .• ark i' *` �0 1-1 i9dsZ /ff.144 <�Y+zYS`r�YT-,: o '.*-;",Ari°"i:'i ... 'b .;!-W'?'S)' ,c N• ",'�,it g z '4,'Y e- ,`Y�1P+'7, ,r� ' LLL'�,.+c• ,�'�`.3�, i�vj 'Jra"r,�^, ..� .� _ye, •� .ae-. • `rre'y"'�r� n.� l�• a ��� � .� ‘� � �^'vM�•'S-:d.t• ..,a, • � i'j" ���• � ,� j ,`i•u�r .'.rtw�f�'r+.iw��,'iw�� ��m �,1l1 '1'"'-.:‘ '{ �:` Y§� ..:isF'� ��M r. xp�,.th:Ast�tcsYxC ` �r;.rk � • ® , Page 4 Order No. 652499 • DESCRIPTION PARCEL 1-A (continued): - an arc distance of 45.43 feet through a central angle of ' 03°44'25" to a point of compound curve; . thence along a curve to the left along said South line, the • • center of which bears North 10'19'06" West having a radius of 1,055.00 feet an arc distance of 209.95 feet through a central angle of 11'24'08" to a point of compound curve; �▪ ° thence along a curve to the left along said South line, the center of which bears North 21°43'14" West having a radius - • of 727.00 feet, an arc distance of 214.77 feet through a central • mangle of 16'55'35" to a point of compound curves us thence along a curve to the left along said South line, the 0 center of which bears North -38°38'49" West having a radius of - - •'% 7 1,571.00 feet an arc distance of 206.57 feet through a central - . 0angle of 07'32'02" to a point of tangency; = i ° thence North 43°49'09" East along said South line a distance of • w 97.17 feet to a line 35 feet Southerly of and parallel with the 00 centerline of the existing most Southerly track of the Chicago, -' 4Milwaukee, St. Paul and Pacific Railroad Tracks: - thence along said parallel line on a curve to the right, the center of which bears South 42'43'18" East having a radius of -. 696.89 feet, an arc distance of 40.09 feet through a central • angle of 03°17'45"; thence North 50'34'27" East along said parallel line a distance of 248.50 feet; • thence along said parallel line on a curve to the right, the • center of which bears South 39'25'33" East having a radius of • • 676.58 feet, an arc distance of 93.64 feet through a central 1 ' I angle of 07°55'47" to a point of reverse curve: y thence along said parallel line on a curve to the left, the , center of which bears North 31'29'46" West having a radius of 428.64 feet, an arc distance of 73.32 feet through a central s angle of 09'48'04" to a point of reverse curve; ` I thence along said parallel line on a curve to the right, the center of which bears South 41°17'50" East having a radius of • . , 2,580.74 feet an arc distance of 437.40 feet through a central • • angle of 09°42'39" to a point of compound curves • - ` thence along said parallel line on a curve to the right, the - - center of which bears South 31°35'11" East having a radius of 2,790.19 feet an arc distance of 789.44 feet through a central angle of 16'12'39" to the East line of the Charles Brownell a Donation Land Claim No. 41; - I thence South 01'24'04" West along said East line a distance of 950.58 feet to the true point of beginning; , e I • 1 - continued - 1 y y..,,y, OCT 9 ?VII( Flied by . � 1� - �--�:.-- :�4��:. 4� m�.� 1 • . : �'�" .,i.a'�4• �. .r.J ^...e:;: YYy, ;,A•,.i.a�• • g;,;....--' ;t ^i q.;>"�-pp :,.��'Y. .._ 2„e•[�!P' gam..` @, �y^�;pa T.. n�'R. f ♦n ;5' ,,:.`�v +• ;►i k". vf.1• w� 1. `M-n ! {:rami"rt _ 1 y'a:,✓. � , 'y'd1. r 4 •o.i r_ t.�' �y� �.,x= a: r:d d. `r{ ,cix•,_z:':' s • ,: •a• t Tr•r .,a..;s.; st:A -i,.. . • •• .• •�� ,���%"`Y y _�' i'°`i.Fv4'.n""� eKq'�5���j:�:4saN;. �„• a �' ti fa�3�i, }'1 1g.:a*' •„ iL „, '�,:' i .e. k'a. �_ �� ,i�.aw.�a�k:' Jt. .. ^' 9l M Ys sYi 2 ,�ra•p�'t ,.t::!c 7'�, g. 3,.. ~ ' 1,Th`j"�+.'!, .a.i�F,7 - 5,4. -'a'7....r^y ,• t 0-.2 - 2t�' eft 4r•-F Act 41,-.V.tii�Y '1 cCYt"` � _C.y ti :'� �"j, "�,�x.�`�• �,'°,c, 1t' y,,�,..�5. "�•sva.,,%,* L '4�sy `bi ,Fi .•y. y;Ll� r,� �} 3i�i�a'sri:��,�;� °y y'�`'i' `-'` iY°4 '�R. ♦" ��!• 'Y-r,7s.• !.r' 1.9�.}'L-' )c ��.'f t.v�-�'d�4 y471 �• ti � `4ms -s 14 �'a� 'r-'►• >''.c.. •�s,.. „ z r,AS-��rr• v .� ' �.FgRy�t;�" t, . • `,�,,,,'�{ y. `,,,,,o:a$`�` ';ti. "'4 y jtfn .t a ,,;.1 `t-ji -g1.-(/141-V `�a, lei' - ,- 1` ,3a '74 4•�. , yG� •qrr r• {n✓pr `�.; .ti tN�y ,,,�X ^y • #A�y y �'i.J' �i,, .e'�;-`ra. �;-. F `�lt�yy',�Q�•,•i�.��1`�.+�uuy°`�.ly� „'t'�Y�i,Q`�[V�� e��. •�"4� d r'�e 4t.',,'�'� X �t 'y�� `'bq'"/�q��'a .,' • ,,,,,„.: ^' G.., .. Jul i.' .. ' :ra r. i�.k1 ;.'▪' 17, n5 ' l... t -4 .. .:%•: fiN^. /jiA': [,. ,tr4 1 ," '0 • • Page 5 ` Order No. 652499 DESCRIPTION (continued) : PARCEL 1-B: That portion of Charles Brownell's Donation Claim No. 41. and of the Southwest 1/4 and the Southeast 1/4 of frSectid on 13. s follows: Township 23 North, Range4 t Beginning at the South 1/4 corner of said Section 13; ' ! thence North 00°58'28" East along the North - South centerline of said Section 13 a distance of 884.84 feet to the Southeast corner ® of Tract 26 of Renton��Shorelands Second Supplemental Maps, 1958; thence South 72 37 52 West along the South boundary of said 0 Tract 26 a distance of 382.60 feet: • thence North 70°54'02°' West along said South boundary of Tract 26 ® a distance of 73.50 feet to the East line of the Charles Brownell ., ei Donation Land Claim No. 41; - . ' 90 thence North 01'24'04" East along said East line of the Charles ':I _ "d Brownell Donation Land Claim No. 41 a distance of 950.58 feet to 44. • ., • a line 35 feet Southerly of and parallel with the centerline of the existing most Southerly track of the Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul and Pacific Railroad Tracks and the true point of . � beginning: thence Westerly along said parallel line on a curve to the left. the center of which bears South 15'22'32" East having a radius of 2790.19 feet, an arc distance of 789.44 feet through a central angle of 16'12'39" to a point of compound curve: • thence continuing along said parallel line on a curve to the left, • e. the center of which bears South 31°35'11" East having a radius of - _ 2580.74 feet, an arc distance of 437.40 feet through a central • angle of 09°42'39" to a point of reverse curve: Z , I thence continuing along said parallel line on a curve to the d right. the center of which bears, North 41'17'50" West having a v radius of 428.64 feet, an arc distance of 73.32 feet through a i central angle of 09'48'04" to a point of reverse curve; • i thence continuing along said parallel line on a curve to the left. 1 the center of which bears South 31°29'46" East having a radius of 676.58 feet, an arc distance of 93.64 feet through a central angle of 07'55'47" to a point of tangency: I thence continuing along said parallel line South 50'34'27" West a distance of 248.50 feet to a point of curve; . thence continuing along said parallel line on a curve to the left, • the center of which bears South 39°25'33" East having a radius of ! 696.89 feet. an arc distance of 40.09 feet through a central angle of 03'17'45" to the South line of the Burlington Northern Railroad right-of-way; I thence North 43'49'09" East along said South line a distance of • • -. 173.83 feet to a point of curve; •1, . i - continued - • I -., .Ierz�'. . yw,{'' w.,'-r.• ,qs„•^•. 'r4'-Vg,zrQ'.", p ..— • — .- .--Vi•A• ..fir ,.-:....- vvi`•�t_'r..-w :�-,'' • •.•� - Filed y 'e-f---'k Y."-,v14 pP ,"=„ r r►t . + .,a-'.c:`iY:�-p _4 t4,,,, .-. . 4: try- , ...•F.r .a. , i>". • • • S. f;. •j.� •}, i ..{. `i... pz'yt k�•.'C,: �^'�' ^N 1';,r:,.f.,:"`"•.:•�K+: �'�LL 3'•U'� , '�..+ L�r• 7re!iY. a 2.�( S'.•` ''t' rr., \,.i ri .r 'r - T,:. •i= . •..-�;x:,a:,', :r.o.�a ��Yk�," �r, r" e2.s• kr! �.•`,�"•`:Y. �1�iJ CV' ir;,d�` 5 i f• '�,fx�>.�',Y •Q, !Hs a -�."�.w .,,.jY� z,y„r� yt �� •�v Fy+•'A•Y,a+;•x•4.t. Ktl,�i*���-}-l�•Y" ly'?�';" .•.."4 tl�r vCT i=�. Yi r' ^f• -.' ' ��'' '';y,0=• '�,^.t.^.� • it •'1'5=:4. �^�'' 'Aq. e.pC�� p e Y''r. ►�%�7vF^•�- �`��;`S �y 9'�Lrr�l•,i'�.21'.^�� d, �kv�,?.,. r,.. ,',F .ry. Ji .. �i b: lX., #.. y �,�1,1 r.•� t, ^.'.T' L' .r d f i}.4•. - •1 -•i:�i:�`-`: NYC? tr�:: '�` i �? �:dr � �. a ?ry -`�.�•s:,� �L;� �. N�?'�„ St yL®e,`'6' �q .. :+;.=".. '" �+ .^f Fro: .7°,V•A - ,.7.7 .a Rz-- K YK= �.f 'S•s•^� ti;�'°�"4�'i'e y � "� fy ,�{ '•A `'�.i. c .�,•r�:' � }�'� •fi .t s' �Q. ' F �4.1�? 4 i% �� �' •Wi �i.' 'i' '-F+• v�'�.r,b Y` Vo ,3 �[Wk�'.8:'lk': �S 77+ ��i,,, '^ •.1 �C 7��`_.a! •'r '�' �f t `+. -4%• ;f.=5_'• ,:ti,,,p .4545,u}1. ,,, . ,, 5 PC1 KYh a y� "';S'% `• ��il+'1 �6 *,� �f r. -' .!`'�i3'• .`l�z•• fti. 6 #��••"�i�-'• 7-'. w. A dt A''r,: f' T .z }h TTt n M r.. �'i�R4MQ•,'r•'1e} '�= .T.:.. .�r�:���"�v1. a}(,%,�tt,��,le. �� �� ti4f,�v+.o �'y J.s l tr,;j+, �(�t'„y!pT)}*; d1 �. ]� � ��(�?l• ,:�,.��j.,,(y�,L��,f1,� ..1 1 �,,'$ ,.-, "'r ' 'r. q�,y 'iGiri74 ;•biz CA . ',�1�,k+'rt LAtii g am• -J i , rw4..q,.' :-..e�A: cry �•1 c. • ttI• Pbt: 6 l Order No. 652499 1 DESCRIPTION PARCEL 1-B (continued) ; thence continuing along said South line on'a curve to the right. the center of which•bears South 46'10°51" East having a radius of 4030.00 feet, an arc distance of 197.57 feet through a central 1 angle of 02°48'32" to a point of compound curve; thence continuing along said South line on a curve to the right. the center of which bears South 43'22'19" East having a radius of 1853.00 feet, an arc distance of 194.75 feet through a central l angle of 06°01°18°° to a point of compound curves thence continuing along said South line on a curve to the right. the center of which bears South 37°21'O1" East having a radius 11, of 10543.00 feet, an arc distance of 166.51 feet through a :a e central angle of 01°00°49°' to a point of compound curve; Cthence continuing along said South line on a curve to the right.' the center of which bears South 36'20°12" East having a radius ' of 1657.00 feet an arc distance of 193.93 feet through a central ® angle of 06°42°20" to a point of compound curve; .3 thence continuing along said South line on a curve to the right. the center of which bears South 29'37°52" East having a radius of 6738.00 feet. an arc distance of 197.76 feet through a central - angle of 01°40'54" to a point of compound curve;- thence continuing along said South line on a curve to the right, thef60 ofe wChian arcrs South distance2of5194.45 East feethaving through a radius central of 1768.00 feet, angle of 06'18'06" to a point of compound curve; • thence continuing along said South line on a curve to the right, the center of which bears South 21'38'52" East having a radius of 8603.00 feet, an arc distance of 204.54 feet through a central angle of O1°21'44" to a point of compound curve; - _ thence continuing along said South line on a curve to the right. the center of which bears South 20°17'0B" East having a radius of 1922,10 feet. an arc distance of 178.79 feet through a central ' s angle of 05°19°46" to a point of compound curve on the East line -I angle said Charles Brownell Donation Land Claim No. 41; : thence continuing along said South line on a curve to the right. i the center.of which bears South 14'57'22" East having a radius i of 2814.93 feet. an arc distance of 659.42 feet through a central • angle of 13°25119'° to a point of compound curve; thence continuing along said South line on a curve to the right. • the center of which bears South 01°32'03" East:having a radius of 1165.09 feet, an arc distance of 1097.05 feet through a central angle of 53°57°00" to a point of tangency; • •: thence continuing along said South line South 37'35'03" East a distance of 308.70 feet to a point of curve; ;` thence continuing along said South line on a curve to the left. • I the center of which bears North 52'24'57°' East having a radius of 1005.37 feet. an arc distance of 45.82 feet through a central 1 : angle of 02'36'41" to a line 35 feet Southerly of and parallel •; • with the centerline of the existing most Southerly track of the . Chicago; Milwaukee, St. Paul and Pacific Railroad Tracks; 1 ' - continued - i q• w•i • '• ' , 3 v .. .�' •„-. 7. ..•71:•?''• .v,„'{FtiVi '" ...elC✓'y 11' `f ,� r._,. -4*.al 't �• ln+).,V''1"��;� + S!r ►!. T.•• --k• ,f�i�!). `y � 'x-° A'a. --. .',7:4•....-.-,...4.'..„14,,-.•.„:‘e,-.r.t,z,,:4l,„','a z','' •e-.1%Ll,l..'-. r ii-.g.'.4.'i.l... a ;, ...a3�"' .�.7 aV , 4,..r..••-_ ,s•r.:,... } •• �'i'yCt} .' %F T : 1 " •a4-..it'fa yY"a�M•.s.,jti4,!Y+. ;. r • i n ' . •sx-'@�r�,,jet, � r ��. dS p§•r¢1.L 4e�}r ti �S7!'�.per' ,. ' . . rlY 0 C tea+ • ;•h.er•'i g;+. ,.L<- "tif :'�-�"' 7‘ '�S;.'ru. .`'' a�" _ v S. p`Gi tea.: i *,��r o �a• y , c r; ,1't4+:'L '. . .•, "`"rgs[( 96•' :. ; i.�}yy' t•t:-1•c,,'--.1d c§; .(M, l ,t � '�'^� rAl..1.,. Y ®vq4 ,altt' ate' •w y' T`Ir ° 4".• Y l li°'.r ` �� r. 9. r .4, ' 11•.z . r;i v' b� F, 'icy �,ry' t.,t4t;t„•, y..r "t+.k� w,.J,,,S P ` a wC, x P ',•• a, -,,T •-v 1 r;+;£Srn ',,ra+?.4': .,a4i}1 -fr$,f'�. 1?1:y�,ee..*�.:+ `"'k+' � .�.? *'Za�'a� +r�A"�.�., �:*Z�3�,tr �� d�# ,P•.�'`"� �Y° .�. � �"r.•" Y��'S1 ` . > °P -e,-d x¢'• 7 t.4,r ,,, x"y1"l.,. . i,'Sr; A-4 .• .fir, r . r .`w.,,ywtra� A 0c`•:?"'�► i --a,. ki4,,`...17 •t'� i n^" " ecre, 1- •`,, ;c eAltic'++'n % 4'r•.0 r;;,•'u• r { t+-q �r+l >w'+ '13 �y} �.« ' +5: r q ,y' i"� �'.. •,'J }7,; rpp}, _�:".� •�': {., ye bi„ c, '!'f�4;° ro'•'"C.+"a°'i'Fl�yaB.t:-.42",ira. c •ri bfi.•^'+t;t 'h .).,„y`p't •'b• ;t�t41'.F! ,r...-4.% +*;:r" 'ix, 1 ' ,y M 4q.;A4'.-41=-, , ,, ,=M 164I,r,i, ei ,«"k�i �# .74v,V"T,','.ye�J�"+n'k7�c*.tYcz- rWi_.,+,Y:li 1k 'ti,k • •i' qpp��� yi .� . ffis''• ,:4 ,' - gt. r; ,[yyr"tx.e, qp� ,40 sa.`R". :i q... 'iS 4., . t x. '4i2 -r I ` 1 �s, �y' y y t� g {�.�.1y 'yip +t, i ' '•'�r"%c'T. ` 14.4,' '4y',ga 1�. jI '1�f 1k '�+q y'�.^c�' • ,ti x'y p.5✓"„ryl'.�,y '�h wM. '°'71c .. . � $('`°L`.'.— ,' j sr •M l"' a 'i� t tidy, i V9A •A ��S1:0Z "I''�'{....(4,.' . 7. 8 I,tst, ."'• Y• • 3 a•& i "M 1i'r r 444 '£ $40.4y. X' ' ,K+. 1�, ,F ' d'. , • 7 r.r' r}a, �. �,�i� , i �•"�. 3'!' � .:A... ,.we�''••n�� c:+.. a,, fir M�Ar Y�W, �3`q r:. u, -� g I Page 7 1 4 Order No. 652499 DESCRIPTION PARCEL 1-B (continued): ' . i thence Westerly along said parallel line Worth 40'11'44" West a distance of 126.24 feet to a point of curve: thence continuing along said parallel line on a curve to the left. the center of which bears South 49'48'16" West having a 1 radius of 1829.78 feet, an arc distance of 309.67 feet through a central angle of 09'41'48"; thence North 49'53'32" West along said parallel line a distance • 0 of 167.07 feet to a point of curve; . :" thence continuing along said parallel line on a curve to the ® left. the center of which bears South 40'06'28" West having a radius of 1102.46 feet, an arc distance of 807.11 feet through a central angle of 41'56'46" to a point of compound curve: vi thence continuing along said parallel line on a curve to the - ••1 ap left. the center of which bears South 01°50'18" East having a radius of 2790.19 feet, an arc distance of 659.24 feet through' ▪ o- a central angle of 13'32'14" to the true point of beginning; •.a • b • 1 i s — ; • i. i' - ! : : • • e a I. ' - continued - It‘l • a � .w�tj F b ` - t ..Y . �...v• r1gn,, �' ' ,. .„ 44,, ;44`..•01,( j r' w S�4 e° p ill; i'll TA eto ` ' ,. 1 ,, ,"• - ,.-. ,e ',e ;-off' f . . �• � •'fir l p - �� �t�, • '...-1 }"- R'"' -a, {?'.-.:: .,+,y., 1"'ti .n'.i.�""c`4.,•: 2. t. .AI. r r.ts,. ^. tit:%-9 �y re-0. ;'s+a"1y'--.,ly 1M 4%.9., 1. �4 4 a':' L�&yy,:y. .;.»:.btS'_- ,a,+°1'R�_t` � �a. ,d•'t• Y� , pty,u�,,g ,t, _,,,,�:�''-y i..,i. Sa„h r y 5`.!:r J,t S i. r,:,,Y r:n Vvst t.:oedr•,Z. •.q..y.4 / ��• �;�:, C-•!� �,. { e fit, y 'riy.'.• J r;. .. • • `t+ w vl ,ctrl ..t.%,�yA�.i` Y`fsra S.,7.- '�,�Jry' , M .�.'. .,y-5', 'q•4 7o t M141,4r �E s '''* {g,:ar jn'Yr:J .@y'S.}'" ""•P �L $ 4''3 W'"d,;rv�. 5*-"t$"q is �'.-r •y �'4 �1..e..17,+v". '.+4- 7f.f.`�S1'':, "'ISr'/9n`�,c .' ii ,�?q;"^'.P:• a fX t �'*��°�' r<Ir0'wf.• it� '����+{{., : ��:c� �a.�'�+`va:°F„^'�,b'',tw,i'C�i• rCi•: ?A:'R�RrA.�ya '�"", 6w'�.+a�,�::.,`� . ,.'*• .' .•'1 a �A'V, `�-' ,'.. k 0,11^, jy Ya ,, 1-.1-a .17, n zit,Y� � V41.s j'J...4:)J�"",� °�', . mt°`... '��4y r =r z a* s3 1,' z; / �, ti,,,"'trt.� S".ti TE t 7 ` st �"k 9 , S j litkvt °'S` " ' �! 4.r 'Ji "y7` si: 's v d, c .'�.. 9a - }" ,�i , L 7 t�' , .' ;(-a w' t,. LK •- ' A. yy����1 "at ,,,- s ��44-...!,"P�c-1. . :, --i. ,,. ..: ' .4-- „C, 4t''1{, y '. ,�i ;'- '�i;•.!.'?�'. ,.k .'"..�R .,.Y.M.:AV,. '•x•: �'$,' y •i.:t ri',{�•N bF.-+ iS.t.. n.x ti� T ; f...f. w{..r .,.wA.� . • o e^ Page 8 ..I Order No. 652499 • DESCRIPTION (continued): - PARCEL 1-C: That portion of Tract 25, Renton Shorelands 2nd Supplemental; AND • That portion of the Southeast 1/4 of Section 13, Township-.23 North, Range 4 East W.M. . and the Southwest 1/4 of Section 13, • 1 and the Southwest 1/4 of Section 18. Township 23 North. Range 5 - East N.M. , described as follows: • - :ID Beginning at the South 1/4 corner of said Section 13; - Q thence North 00°58'28" East along the North - South centerline 1' - ca of said Section 13, a distance of 884.84 feet to the Southeast ® corner of Tract 26 of Renton Shorelands Second Supplemental _ up Flaps, according to the unrecorded plat thereof. and the true W point of beginning; - I thence South 72°37'52" West along the South boundary of said Tract 26. a distance of 382.60 feet: thence North 70°54'02" West along the South boundary of said .,:+ Tract 26. a distance of 73.51 feet to the East line of the Charles Brownell Donation Land Claim No. 41; thence North 01'24'04" East along said East line, a distance of 950.58 feet to a line 35 feet Southerly of and parallel with - the centerline of the existing most Southerly track of the Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul and Pacific Railroad Tracks; thence along said line 35 feet Southerly of and parallel with • - the centerline of the most Southerly track. along a curve to the right, the center of which bears South 15'22 32" East, having a radius of 2,790.19 feet, an arc distance of 659.24 feet through 1 ' j a central angle of 13'32'14" to a point of compound curve; :, thence along a curve to the right, along said parallel line. the • center of which bears South 01 50'18" East having a radius of a 1.102.46 feet. an arc distance 807.11 feet through a central I angle of 41'56'46"; • - thence South 49°53'32" East, along said parallel line. a distance of 167.07 feet; thence along a curve to the right. along said parallel line. • having a radius of 1,829.78 feet. an arc distance of 309.67 feet through a central angle of 09°41'48"; • • thence leaving said parallel line, South 40'11'44" East. a distance - of 126.24 feet to a point on the South line of the Burlington 6: Northern Railroad right-of-way; • thence along a curve to the left, along said South line. the center of which bears North 49'48'16" East having a radius of 1.005�37�feet. an arc distance of 549.02 feet through a central angle of 31 17 19 • • ! to a point tangent on said South line of the Burlington Northern .ti Railroad right-of-way; • thence continuing along said South line, South 71'29'03" East along ' 4 a line 50 feet South of and parallel with the existing Southbound tract, a distance of 826.56 feet to the West line of said Section 18; • d - continued - : � • �1- s Y + a. '�„ •.ro'�'.y� 'a rfipi+A ,,tea*�' t it - u4 ''',t• L C' ' cpt ' . .»-. i ,�0.prl1° +OIt. .Y .,, �4: 2 I l.. ^i tom h'K' _ - •. i, .- ,wr.„;.e.. -1 '� .. '+4;�„r ,.sr •••4-at -aim ..;+y 6.a c v. .ol .,,. •t • a.q. T:..,v,al.y �..t_..-- -. • -...„,,. \m �•.0 ..L'..r-, .. ..� r°, ... a:i . & L t, a, .•S.i. ` .' a C . �' °i xC Z-Y, r,^ Jw 1J,,�.• 'wf,•"✓.��� :�'.� ;' ;,-v•4:, :t' r ?-4• '-g;'. •Al$ ,t-Wp r •{:t , .�. �'-ti•w,a:+'➢',3"``-•r. N•tc •� 'f�'•, o T`r' Y ``;44N 1,,:�.!a 'C'3'4.5.,,�. e :.' '.•••-•i " 'eFF '':'f. 4:..-t�l`..` T'. •.J•!..4S.7C-. I..; 1•44- r ri{, �&':tt ih nl T� yti',';' °':+� `.j..d.r{;°SY. .4:.-r`" .. ::,�'?a.�,"•c.e;+ ,a�1 ��,•,-�.°'^ � �`°a-'.,; �.,.,A.. .i-{•- s .a` :4, •F' d a'�+y. ,� :*3 Lc r a. '1 .7• e4 e`, '"- v' +' Y'^ �';•: 2 p pvr -.jki ,,'a _"' v� is p. �'' Y.,1:- 4,,. 'burl a3 i5.T.. s y„ 5p�a�..fKi Py:ea, w u i C;• .:. 3•,•;":gyC.1:: - k' ,,.. '',1 a,, � .T "{a P h 1° ,''' a°_i''ta.m� 'ddt,, ' " .? t1":'' ;•q.Y #,,I.: `d: y,7,..,c • k+ }. {.y; •C' i" h,1,,,-. ��pp l[[��,, ,�y�' ,y�yyf��� q4z+i'r +�•,'a 9 Y.. �F t_ +j 1T',:.4,`•t •ny �yi. � pait. , ,,„10.y�'' T11P. 9fy•',i,t^y` � ....;rN ,yc�Y{"yR��h,.:,{t• -4%yi�,,,--,'y Yv.-*1--, ; '''. +'�a+SxT' N+4Y.o r". .'`::..- •' .,bN-2Y ,"1"• ' tM.t�]]Y4SSYY'::"•f,.4 p,..a �`'A �t Ws .✓✓I` C,,), .;,.: •A,r, y`v Gt W'•' ' ,, .F� yf_,��TkTk".. • "�`�S4,!,4,?#; „ei4 240, SY. ;L "Ss'rtY , •a.`I' P .*.. V, 4, ''"v- ,,,pit, :vr."'alYy . ::, �x .oe.r.o..?• .4.;''+ '8''-' :.4;'.d�jr 4b. :i§794W 1'�d i$,$. 'f °A' P'. 4,.wt',.' •s4 {;f t•7:':., i�',r�'t' " 41•,.!' .r,';71:X 0. t4N R*; ° 1,1•vA KI 71 Q- ,R. !'' , '$ne4 � ✓• e: '41T° ;1`?-'-i ; ',` L ai,��? ra,z' e Vitt'. ,,7a .*' ,.1 ,y{y "a' ��jy li§ 7,. • i`• • OLIO' +4. �i i ' • •�, .2a R. Ail' 4 •4.r 4 9. ti 1 ,�'lY�,pp"w ••+ ',. • �,�` ±"r=+u. the w. 5ary a„A.'•. �'° V" °'J a u•—,„.,``•�;'L,l,`'',:k•P. . " r.( as, "Ss.,,,f. ,+., , �'SK t t; Page 9 Order No. 652499 - DESCRIPTION PARCEL 1-C (continued): _It. thence continuing along said South line South 71°29'03" East. a distance of 85.52 feet to the North line of the South 650 feet of the Southwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of said Section 18; 1 thence North 89°10'25" West along the North line of said ( - -. 1 Southwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 18. a distance of .- r - 1 81.57 feet to the East line of the Southeast 1/4 of said Section 13; thence North 88°15'00" West along the North line of the South 650 feet of the Southeast 1/4 of said Section 13. t distance of 2.261.41 feet to an angle point on the South boundary of Tract 25 °- 0 of Renton Shore Lands, 1958; • e thence North 33'07'25" West along said South boundary. a distance •' 0 of 154.51 feet to an angle point; : • ` thence North 27°21'32" East along said South boundary. a distance OD of 387.32 feet to an angle point; thence North 83'17'25" West along said South boundary. a distance - 1 of 171.17 feet; 4 thence South 46'22'22" West along said South boundary. a distance of 324.66 feet; • thence South.72'37'52" West along said South boundary. a distance • of 76.33 feet to the true point of beginning; Situate in the City of Renton.- County of King. State of Washington. . • 9 • A a U i _ 1 II a , 9 • • I • • - continued - • �- 9 ,km.. fed E• • ..,, : , ; �.''.11 h w_ .., �_r ...<.►.-...,„.r..,,,,...+Atm--n. `r.-s«s. aF:. 4,,.:a.•.,f,°t ',-_D .wry t,•�`gg� rah . �:* .›... • _,,,.e.,•�!t .Q: F.:vg o..W.)..K.SS7 ORDER NO. 6c'1 (PR ny ceo. Fo No.WM Ma-- . ; ESCROW NO. 49 LOAN NO. MORTGAGOR PLAT MAP Vol PG_,_ -- PR VOW5h4 �kCT /3- TRW 23 A/ 2a- 4 L GL/LI i 7/D44 .TUNE A1I % cur aP 51&977Z 61 1 M. /2.175 Clialf5 snyvea Z Le V/ 7 ,26✓xv 9,19Z 644D5 2° SUS 41.vf'' •\ �_ te pV•N .3`1 \ • 4' \ <I M CC i ='ems Q )kM2 Cr ' ka - -- _,,--. a _ ..,...-c-c. -4.,..."--e . I, cP- • g�4s Via- a 2 . "ems. o • 4 le- 44 q0 ifil d/ .f., This map does not purport to show all highways , roads or easements affecting ..:V..W.gt,�,gssom ORDER NO. 6.5 999 L/ ESCROW NO. LOAN NO. MORTGAGOR PLAT MAP Vol PG -1, R.P. V hf /09705' 659•QP .•B" • 6s9.21 'SQa p� L p91.76tin Ch 11 16 Y � A A �1h ° Vq TA"'" V" • IP • i ink ` ` h �°� Nt /.-------"— :11; i 4. . t9 ,S �2a� A ;14 �'' '� 26 902.611 pkso, fi 5s -I\ J 126 70'pS . • This map does not purport to show all highways , roads or easements affecting Term oao.w•. ;eNo. ORDER NO. 6529l9 • `-- ESCROW NO. WE 3 LOAN NO. 1 ' MORTGAGOR PLAT MAP Vol PG_____ S r € 308 ,�\` by k RI et) �J <r. W Ni vi . le 7A'' ' Ic" . . e,�,,.y6 1 rD,v, k p. ,.v,.e. " 2264 0 • This map does not purport to show all highways, roads or easements affecting �`�`�' `� R;{;i \tip s^ E -I, , . ROED & HITCHINGS. INC. a �jvi % \.4 01 log) d EXHIBIT 2 BUILV1 .. NACHES AVENUE SOUTHWEST (TOTAL 60' RIGHT—OF—WAY IN BLACK RIVER CORPORATE PARK) : THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTH HALF OF SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, LYING WITHIN 30.00 FEET ON EACH SIDE OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED CENTERLINE: BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTH 650.00 FEET OF SAID SECTION 13 WHICH IS NORTH 88°15'00" WEST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE 1626.50 FEET FROM THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID SECTION 13; THENCE NORTH 1 °45'00" EAST 225.00 FEET; THENCE ON A CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING'A RADIUS OF 853.34 FEET A DISTANCE OF 209.55 FEET; THENCE NORTH 12°19'12" WEST 329.69 FEET; THENCE ON A CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF 600.00 FEET A DISTANCE OF 724.11 FEET TO A LINE WHICH IS PARALLEL WITH AND 55.00 FEET SOUTHERLY, WHEN MEASURED RADIALLY FROM THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF THE CHICAGO, MILWAUKEE, ST. PAUL AND PACIFIC RAILROAD RIGHT—OF—WAY; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE 2082.08 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 46°10'35" WEST 301.71 FEET TO A POINT WHICH IS 54.10 FEET WHEN MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES TO THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID CHICAGO, MILWAUKEE, ST. PAUL AND PACIFIC RAILROAD RIGHT—OF—WAY; THENCE SOUTH 43°49°09" WEST PARALLEL WITH SAID SOUTHERLY LINE 254.90 FEET; THENCE ON A CURVE TO LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF 250.00 FEET A DISTANCE OF 143.00 FEET, MORE OR LESS TO THE E NORTH BOUNDARY OF A TRACT OF LAND DEEDED TO KING COUNTY BY DEED RECORDED UNDER AUDITOR'S FILE NO. 6607786, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY AND THE END OF SAID CENTERLINE DESCRIPTION. • FIRST CITY EQUITIES BLACK RIVER CORPORATE PARK • NOVEMBER 17, 1986 BRH NO. 86114.01 SURVEY DISK 12 'e�f`a�R L.M r-.,/: ., - i % t �1r j O c �f'a# I • o��4 ��d� CiS T EaF' t'i •.t �0'-dll LAND S0 r r 11 CITY OF RENTON %0 ,O. Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney 1C D " o:1 . Kellogg - David M. Dean-Mark E. Barber - Zanetta L. Fontes -Theodore R. Parry '(a 11 Assistant City Attorneys .� NOV 1 ? 1�� November 14, 1986 B'�+i n1NG/ZONI"1C P''PT. TO: Jeanette McKague, Building & Zoning Department FROM: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney RE: ADMAC Building Permit - Blackriver Corporate Park Dear Jeanette: I have reviewed the proposed Agreement as submitted to the City by Barbara E. Moss of First City Equities. I have also briefly reviewed the Hearing Examiner's opinion on the Site Plan Approval. Initially, the Hearing Examiner's opinion requires an 80 foot reserved strip along the length of the entire parcel running on the south but not to interfere with the Greenbelt preserves . The Agreement provides for only 60 feet. Since I do not know the exact location of the reserve strip I cannot comment on whether or not its location is not interferring with Greenbelt preserves. While paragraph 6 (b) permitting shifting of the owner' s share of road improvements is generally not• a bad idea, it does not necessarily meet with the Hearing Examiner's decision. Rather, the Hearing Examiner's opinion is silent. as to the transferability of this burden. An Administrative decision • must be made as to whether or we will permit the shifting of this burden. Then each application to the City to shift the burden must be analyzed on a case by case basis so that the burdened property or bond is adequate to cover the City' s reasonable expenses should it be compelled to construct the right of way for the City rather than having the owner do so. Paragraph 1 states that the owner will ultimately construct a 36 foot wide roadway. That is not disclosed in the Hearing Examiner' s decision and so I cannot comment upon that require- ment. With the exception of the 60 foot substitution of reservation for the 80 foot requirement in the Hearing Examiner' s decision, Post Office Box 626 - 100 S 2nd Street - Renton, Washington 98057 - (206) 255-8678 / ue Jeanette McKague Page 2 November 14, 1986 I see no direct legal problem with the proposed Agreement. The City should ensure that the legal descriptions are accurate and that the Agreement is filed for record. The Agreement should be carefully reviewed by your Department to make sure that the disclosures and agreements set forth herein, not contained in the Hearing Examiner' s decision, are agreeable to your Department. - .6Z445-4/Le,G4,;3)0/L-C/IL____-- Lawrence J. Warren LJW:nd cc: Mayor / . , , ,, ,'c w r;`r�byx"r Iy .SK#J343 am,,.B s� *,_ww,,ca*c^ ..wsnr a, I�" F;''.IL:.1�+7 V•� ,IS`W • j9T Y _ FIRSTCiTY _ , ,�� 1 November 11, 1986 EQUITIES v.,1. � •�11�, 986 i . , nWmP NTT • Jeanette McKague CITY OF RENTON BUIJI / 7.',-..7 -,... . Building & Zoning Department 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA ' 98055 RE: ADMAC Building Permit BLACKRIVER CORPORATE PARK Dear Jeanette: The Hearing Examiner conditioned site plan approval of the ADMAC • property with the requirement that restrictive convenants be executed providing for participation in Area' wide traffic improvements not to exceed those contained in the traffic anaylsis on the project. First City is currently requesting a building permit to build the ADMAC facility and must address this condition prior to issuance of the permit. The Examiner also indicated that staff in consultation with the city attorney may substitute methods . . other than covenants, if possible, to bind the land and applicant and which accomplish the objective. , • To that end, please find enclosed our proposed agreement addressing the Hearing Examiner's conditions. Please review the • document with the City Attorney and get back to me as quickly as possible with comments. I am in hopes of receiving the ADMAC building permit by November 17 and may need to have our ( agreement in place by then. Thanks for your help. Warm regards, FIRST CITY EQUIT ES . • LS-,,ilejA4 ' .72te_ Barbara E. Moss Director of Planning ' BEM:bc cc: Larren Warren, City Attorney, City of Renton ' Michael Courtnage . Royce Berg David Schuman • 800 Fifth Avenue•Suite 4170•Seattle,Washington 98104•(206)624-9223 Real Estate Development and Investments , ' , ,. _ . (//' AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT entered into as of this day of November, 1986 between FIRST CITY DEVELOPMENTS CORP. , a Washington corporation, as nominee ("Owner") and the CITY OF RENTON, Washington, a Municipal Corporation ("City") . RECITALS A. Owner is the owner of the real property described in Exhibit 1 hereto (the "Property") B. Owner has applied for a Site Plan approval with respect to a portion of the Property under City File Numbers SA-057-86 and V-058-86 (the "Applications") . C. The City's hearing examiner has recommended „ a;,1�,r'�i'�1 , approval of the Applications, subject to certain conditions, %0:� 9i / including the Owner' s execution of an agreement with the City ✓>r /,' placingcertain restrictions with respect to a sixty 4 ,, __�- p (60) foot �._- wide strip through the property. D. Owner is willing to enter into an agreement with the City to restrict such portion of the Property. NOW, THEREFORE,the parties covenant and agree as follows: �/ Owner agrees that it will not construct buildings or other structures within the sixty (60) foot wide section of the Property described in Exhibit 2 (the "Restricted Property") i and that it will set aside and reserve the Restricted Property %; 4 for Owner's ultimate construction thereon of a thirty six (36) ' foot wide roadway with twenty-four (24) feet of right-of-way T ' meeting City standard and the dedication thereof to the Citty, , (tP' O o --C 0 (_) `)wk}tee & Sak_ e.,k��._._) . d N,A :4 0 o 'V' d 2 . Owner and City agree that the current description ,�, < r of the Restricted Property represents the parties current best c estimate of the desired location for the roadway extension. The 1L V' Restricted Property may be relocated by mutual agreement of the parties as reflected in an amendment to this Agreement. n " (---- .) The City acknowledges that Owner will be developing W the portions of the Property adjacent to the Restricted Property in phases and agrees to cooperate with Owner in the selection of curb cuts providing access from the Property onto the Restricted Property to provide adequate ingress and egress from such developed Property, subject to the City's review and approval of such phases. The City also acknowledges that Owner has advised (11/10/86) -1- e • it that Owner intends to construct the final roadway on the Restricted Property in phases, corresponding with the L development of the adjacent Property, and agrees that it has no y� objection to the phased construction of the roadway. 5. The City acknowledges that Owner has advised it that Owner would like to landscape the planned twenty four (24) feet of non-pavement right-of-way on the Restricted Property in a manner in excess of minimum City requirements. The City agrees to cooperate with owner in processing owner' s submittals of plans and specifications for such landscaping. 6. Owner further agrees that (a) it will join in participng in area-wide traffic improvements consistent with those contained in the traffic analysis performed in connection �ACa'� with the Application and (b) the cost of Owner' s share thereof will be borne by the Property. The City agrees to cooperate with Owner in allocating such costs on a pro rata basis among the portions of the Property to be developed and in developing means whereby portions of the Property can be transferred free from the restrictions of this paragraph, provided such parcels ' pro rata share of the traffic improvements are transferred to other portions of the Property, covered by bonds or other security or are otherwise reasonably provided for. 7 . The City acknowledges that this Agreement satisfies conditions 1 and 2 of the hearing examiners report on the Application, dated August 13 , 1986. 8 . The agreements contained herein shall run with the Property and be binding upon all parties having or acquiring any right, title or interest in the Property or any part thereof, unless released in writing by the parties. FIRST CITY DEVELOPMENTS CORP. ("OWNER") �� By w w�"", v fry' Its 4ftr u,o)-1 dt iv _ fix I, In Q( `v`fir° w9`N Its -;Y' j\Nsj61.6a* k, 4P`L' %) org- ' ` - e,c. ,(0- r Accepted By CITY OF RENTON ("City") i77 @-)*411.(:;-,Dv))Arl'°- tv. -ciaN ���p. Attest: v� �Q� � t'l� City Clerk ADDED AGENDA ITEMS APPROVAL REQUIRED - MODIFIED SITE PLAN ECF-064-86 BERKLEY STRUCTURES, INC. SA-072-86 Application for site plan approval to allow the construction of a two story building which will house laboratories on the first floor and office space on the second floor; located at the southwest intersection of Lind Avenue S.W. and S.W. 39th Street. Modifications include parking, outside storage, isles and fire access. ECF-050-86 FIRST CITY EQUITIES SA-057-86 Appliation for site plan approval to construct two V-058-86 story office/warehouse building having 93,170 square feet. Property located at 500 block of Natches Avenue S.W. Modifications include fire access. 3237Z • • • • • O • • . • • •• • . • . 1 • • • ' • • . . L • OF I2 • l «‹) • • 4.1 •�e .A. ° THE CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING_ 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 cb BARBARA' Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER 9,0 �o• p Q FRED'J. KAUFMAN. 235-2593 -to SEP1-- • August 28, 1986 Barbara E. Moss First City Equities 800 Fifth Avenue Suite 4170 • Seattle, Wa. 98104 RE: First City Equities File No. SA-057-86 and V-058-86 • Dear Ms. Moss: The Examiner's Report regarding the referenced application which was published August 13, 1986 has not been appealed within the 14-day period established by ordinance. Therefore, this matter is considered final and is being transmitted to the City Clerk this date .for filing. Please feel free to contact this office if further assistance or information is required. Sincerely, V FRED J. KAUFMAN HEARING Examiner FJK:dk • cc: City Clerk Building & Zoning Department of •o © 0 THE CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 oam. ° BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER 9° co• FRED J. KAUFMAN. 235-2593 0 4 FD SEP �e�Q August 22, 1986 CITY OFRENTONBarbara E. Moss D OMC First City Equities 1 RUC(.,I F; 1986 800 Fifth Avenue Suite 4170 - u Seattle, WA 98104 BUILDING /ZDNIr G DEPT. Re: File No. SA-057-86 and V-058-86; Clarification Request Dear Ms Moss: I have reviewed your letter of August 15, 1986 concerning the denial of the variance for cul-de-sac extension and my response follows. I am also in receipt of a Memorandum from Zoning Administrator Roger Blaylock regarding similar matters. This response will also serve as a response to Mr. Blaylock's memo. I don't believe the decision requires modification in light of the current status of the subject site, an undivided parcel. You may extend within your boundaries any form of driveway, although since dedication is ultimately expected, the drive should probably correspond with City standards for public roads. If a slight extension of Naches Avenue is necessary beyond 500 feet, the staff report was unclear in this regard, this letter shall authorize such extension and shall be read to approve a variance of sufficient length to reach your property's southern property line. While the original report denied the variance sufficient justification was cited in the report to grant a minimum variance to reach the subject site with an extension of Naches Avenue. On the,separate matter of the width of such roadway, responded to outside of the public hearing process by the Public Works Director (See enclosure) - I believe the decision contained sufficient latitude to incorporate Mr. Houghton's comments. If this office can be of further assistance please feel free to call. Sincerely, l•'- FRED J. KAUFMAN HEARING EXAMINER a'- . = - E% E n ter= • — .. �' II._ .. _ __ .. .M is . _ __ _ _ _ . AG 18 1986,•_ _ . .• FI5 ' CIT (: R y ®F RENTON,THEARNGEQUITIES August 15, 1986 Mr. Fred J. Kaufman Hearing Examiner CITY OF RENTON 200 Mill Avenue S. Renton, WA -98005 RE: File #SA-057-86 and' #V-058-86 ADMAC-Blackriver Corporate Park Dear Mr. Kaufman: I am in receipt of your Report and Decision dated August 13, 1986, in which you approved the ADMAC site plan on the Blackriver property but denied our request for a variance to extend Naches Avenue beyond 500 feet. In reviewing your report, it is our understanding that we are permitted to build Naches Avenue to extend from the property line and to run north to serve the ADMAC site, as long as the road does not exceed 500 feet in length• from that property line. Please confirm your approval of this interpretation with a letter by August 22, 1986 in order to allow me time to review it prior to the final acceptance of your report. Warm Regards, FIRST CITY EQUITIES - • Barbara E.. Moss • . _ . Director-of -Planning - • _ . BEM/rm. --:.n ;t 1. • cc: Royce..Berg ::_ _ • Bob--.Roed- -- - • _ . David Schuman • • 800 Fifth Avenue•Suite 4170•Seattle;Washington 98104 (206)624-9223 and Investments OF 4 ' 4 ° BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT n . , -i sal RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR O MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH.98055 0 235-2540 OOgT�D SEP'�E�O�Q BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR ECEIVED AUG 191986 DATE: August 14, 1986 CITY OF RENTON TO: Fred J. Kaufman. Hearing Examiner HEARING EXAMINER FROM: oger J. Blaylock, Zoning Administrator SUBJECT: CLARIFICATION OF DECISION FILE V-058-86/FIRST CITY EQUITIES The Building and Zoning Department would like to request a clarification of the Hearing Examiner's decision concerning the specific length of the cul-de-sac for Naches Avenue. Naches Avenue when constructed will extend approximately 500 feet from South Seventh Street to the southern edge of the subject site. To provide street frontage and allow the parking lot adequate circulation access as proposed in the site plan, Naches Avenue should be extended another 500 feet to the northern edge of the proposed AdMac Development. The applicant had proposed extending Naches Avenue an additional 300 feet to the north which does appear to allow potential for future development beyond the present site plan request. This does appear to be in conflict with the-intent of the criteria to approve the minimum variance necessary. It would seem that the variance would have to be granted to allow the frontage along the western edge of the AdMac Site to be developed. Based upon the decision of the Examiner to deny the variance in total, the Building and Zoning Department could not -allow the extension of any of Naches Avenue onto the subject site because Naches Avenue is already at the maximum 500 foot length. Building and Zoning Department would appreciate clarification to determine if it was the intent of the Examiner to allow the cul-de-sac to extend the 500 feet to the northern edge of the subject or to terminate at the southern property line. RJB:ss 3061Z OF R41- ° PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT RICHARD C. HOUGHTON ® DIRECTOR o coMUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 9o9gr e � 206 235-2569 el) SEPIEM BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH ECEIVED MAYOR • MEMORANDUM AUG 191986 CITY OF RENTON TO: Fred Kaufman, Hearing Examiner !-TEARING EXAMINER FROM: Richard Houghton, Public Works Director SUBJECT: SA-057-86 ADMAC Building First City Equities • From discussions with the applicant after the public hearing, it appears that there was some disagreement as to the classification of the roadway through the property. In discussions with the applicant engineer prior to the hearino and as part of the overall transportation plan for the area , it was decided to designate that portion of Natches Ave. S.W. through this property as an industrial access roadway with 36 feet of pavement from curb to curb in a 60 foot right-of-way. The Public Works staff do not see any reason to classify this section of road- way as an industrial collector. I hope this assists you in your decision Dick Houghton DGM:ckd CITY OF RENTON ` 1 4 • 1 AUG 1 a= 1986 uf!D!NG!Z'ON!N+G DFPT. August 13, 1986. OFFICE OF THE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND DECISION. APPLICANT:. FIRST CITY EQUITIES' FILE NO. : SA-057-86 and V- 058-86 LOCATION: Located on the east side of Naches Avenue S.W at the 500 block. - SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Site Plan approval to allow the construction of a two- story building having 93,170 square feet for office, manufacturing and warehouse uses and a Variance to allow a cul-de- sac road length over 500 feet. SUMMARY OF ACTION: Building and Zoning Department Recommendation: Approval with conditions. Hearing Examiner Decision: Site Plan approved with conditions; Variance is denied. BUILDING & ZONING The Building & Zoning DEPARTMENT REPORT: Department Report was received by the Examiner on July 30, 1986. PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Building and Zoning Department Report, examining available information on file with the application, and field checking the property and surrounding area,. the . Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: , The hearing was, opened on August 5, 1986, at 9: 05 A.M. in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. First City Equities SA-057-86 & V-058-86 August 13, 1986 Page 2 The following exhibits were entered into the record: - Exhibit #1 - Yellow file containing application, proof of posting and publication, and other documentation pertinent to this request. Exhibit #2 - Site Plan Exhibit #3 - Landscape Plan Exhibit #4 - Illustrative Master Plan of the entire site. Exhibit #5 - Transportation Plan between applicant and Metro. . Exhibit #6 - Letter from Barbara Moss to, Ron Olson dated July 18, 1986. Exhibit #7 - Letter from Roger Blaylock to Royce Berg dated August 1, 1986.. The Zoning Administrator, .Roger Blaylock opened the hearing by entering Exhibits 1 - 4 and continued setting out background information on the applicant's request and comments from staff. He stated the application is for site plan approval of a phased development; the building will be utilized as an office and manufacturing/warehouse facility for the world headquarters of Admac Company; the applicant is leasing the ground to the corporation but will retain ownership control over the property and development at this time; a cul-de-sac is requested' greater than 500 ft. in length, with the applicant proposing to construct 500 additional feet in length to be added on to an existing str`eet,' Naches Avenue. ' • • The specific site is 4.3 acres; the variance is requested due to- '' the size and shape of the .site; 'the applicant is aware they will have to construct a 2300 sq. ft. long street through the site to allow full development of the Black River Industrial Park and feels this can be staged and still meet the emergency access requirements necessary. Continuing,. Mr. Blaylock reviewed the criteria to be considered when approving" "a variance and stated the applicant has special circumstances to; b'e considered on this site due to the size (approximately 90 acres) , shape (long and narrow) and the location of the property. He said the western portion of the' site is to be dedicated to the City to: try and preserve the natural ' elements' of} the site;. Naches •Avenue will serve the entire site with a second' access off Powell Avenue. The applicant has been discussing the infrastructure of'the road system with staff, and it was pointed out that the Fire Department is requesting that an emergency First City Equities SA-057-86 & V-058-86 August 13, 1986 Page 3 roadway be constructed prior to framing of the buildings. It was. suggested that the applicant dedicate to the City a reservation for the industrial collector street. In closing remarks regarding the Variance, the Zoning Administrator recommended approval. Reviewing the Site Plan. request, it was noted that an attempt is being made to take the natural amenities in the forebay that surrounds the P-1 Channel and enhance them to create a focus for the office park. Mr. Blaylock stated the drainage system will be enhanced by the addition of bridges, jogging trails and landscaping, with the western portion of the site being left in its natural state. The Zoning Administrator advised a significant 'stand of trees 'has been designated as preserved on the site; and a review of staff comments was presented. It was recommended that the applicant participate in future traffic improvements within the . complete site; should construct Naches Ave. S.W. and the emergency access road from Powell Ave. S.W. prior to framing of the building, and provide a legal document that will permanently, reserve the right-of-way for construction of Naches Ave. S.W. from S.W. 7th Street to Oakesdale Avenue S.W. for an industrial collector arterial. 'With these closing comments, Mr. Blaylock 'recommended the Examiner approve the proposal as submitted. Testifying- in favor of the project for the applicant 'was: Barbara Moss First City Equities. 800 Fifth Avenue Suite' 4170 - Seattle, Wa. 98104 ' Ms. Moss advised the Examiner there would be no fence around they site; access, off Naches will be a controlled access through the use of boardwalks and jogging trails to create a park-like setting', and presented Exhibit #5 setting out transportation goals and achievements between the applicant and Metro. Ms. Moss discussed the recommendations by staff and stated they would prefer not to have restrictive covenants for traffic, improvements':placed''on the: site but will sign a letter of intent to do the improvements when- they are warranted; would like to leave the reservation area open where Naches will connect to Oakesdale so they can determine from the Public Works Department as to its exact location, noting' Monster Road is always available as access for their hauling operation; and discussions have been held with Public Works and they were instructed,and have planned for a 60 ft. right-of-way for industrial access. Ms. Moss referred to the cul-de-sac stating it is temporary. She stated the previous owners had a special permit to build a permanent cul-de-sac but when theapplicant purchased' ' the property they decided to extend the roadway all the .way' through; .the applicant has requested infrastructure approval on the entire road as they are currently working on it now, as well as the other off-site 'amenities that will be located throughout the site so they can obtain a complete design approval from the City possibly be free to build on a phase-by-phase basis on-site. In First City Equities SA-057-86 & V-058-86 August 13, 1986 Page 4 closing, Ms. Moss reviewed the landscaping on the site; requested HDK share in the cost of the curbs, gutters and sidewalks as their property abuts this site by approximately 500; and introduced the architect for this project. ' Testifying further in support of this proposal was: Royce Berg, Architect LPN Architects 114 Vine Street Seattle, Washington, 98121 Mr. Berg addressed parking for the site stating there are 158 parking stalls projected which is less than the 200 that are permitted. The applicant doesn't feel they need the additional parking for the use of the facility and will instead use additional landscaping and call the landscaping a parking reserve.. ' Referring to the fire access he stated it will come off Powell Avenue, go to Naches, and would like to make an access- easement for emergency access to the south of the building. They would like to reach an „ agreement as to the type of surface to be used which could possibly contain some grass, which would blend into the landscaping. The , ' fire department has indicated a preference for a hard surface. The emergency access would run completely through the property via and east-west road, with possibly more than a 20 ft. width, above and beyond the landscape buffer to the south of that roadway which id not required by the City. Mr. Berg also stated they would like latitude with the Fire Department as to the phasing of the development with regard to paving of the access points proposed. He had no further comments at this time. The Examiner called for further testimony in support of the application. There was no one wishing to speak. There was no testimony in opposition, and no further comments were offered by staff. The hearing closed at 10:30 A.M. FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & DECISION: • Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: 1. The applicant, First City Equities, filed a request for approval of a Site Plan for a two story building containing " approximately 93, 170 square feet of interior space, together with a request for a Variance to allow a cul-de-sac road greater..than 500 feet in length. 2 . The yellow file containing the staff report, the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) documentation and other pertinent materials was entered into the record as Exhibit #1. I First City Equities SA-057-86 & V-058-86 August 13, 1986 Page 5 3. The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) ; the City's responsible official issued a declaration of non-significance (DNS) for the subject proposal. 4. The subject proposal was reviewed by all departments, with an interest in the matter. 5. The subject site is located on the east side of Naches Avenue S.W. at the 500 block, in what is the extreme southeast corner of the Black River Office Park property. 6.' The subject site was annexed into the City with the adoption of Ordinance 1745 enacted in April, 1959, as amended by Ordinances 1756 and 1928 adopted in May, 1959 and December, 1961, respectively. The subject site was rezoned from its initial G (General) zoning to M-P (Manufacturing Park) zoning with the adoption of Ordinance 3694 adopted in December, 1982 . A preliminary plat and special permit for fill and grade had been approved for the site but expired by law.. A new special permit was approved in May, 1986 which permits filling the subject site. 0 7. The map element of the Comprehensive Plan designates the area in which the subject site is located as suitable for the development of Manufacturing Park/Multiple Option uses, but. does not mandate such development without consideration of other policies of the plan. 8. The subject site is undeveloped. It is in the extreme southeast corner of the crescent' shaped parcel and is only a small approximately 4. 3 acre, portion of a parcel approximately 89 acres in, size. The property has not been divided by a formal plat. Improvements such as roads and utility lines have not been extended through the site. 9. The parcel has frontage along Powell Avenue S.W. which is east of the site via what was a temporary turn-around/cul-de-sac constructed by Washington Technical Park. The site will have frontage along proposed Naches Avenue S.W. , immediately west of the site, as a result of an ERC mitigation measure. 10. The area south of the site is being developed by both HDK and. the current applicant, First City Equities. North of the site is a railroad right-of-way and the undeveloped western portion of the CHG Sun Point complex. • 11. The applicant proposes constructing a two story painted concrete and reflective tinted glass walled building on the southern two-thirds of the site. The northern third would be reserved for the expansion of the current tenant', ADMAC. The current tenant proposes establishing _its corporate offices at the site along with manufacturing and warehousing operations. First City Equities SA-057-86 & V-058-86 August 13, 1986 Page 6 •i 12. A drainage channel runs along the south edge of the subject site. The channel provides a regulated flow of water to stands of trees preserved as a condition of the rezone. The site plan shows this feature to have been significantly enhanced by the applicant. The. 'ditch° will be widened and combined with landscaping to form an eighty (80•) foot wide landscape corridor along the south edge of the subject site. The applicant proposes (although not legally committed• at this time) to incorporate this type of landscape theme into the remainder of the development. The landscaping and channel would also be coordinated with the area preserved along the , north side of the Black River Channel just west of the site.;, 13. The grading plan and proposed site plan attempt to save significant natural vegetation and land forms including the aforementioned stands of trees, and the natural swales on the site. ;14. Additional landscaping along the south side of the building • will be initially provided in an area reserved for future parking as provided under Section 4-2208 (12) . The applicant believes that the minimum standard required parking is excessive for the subject proposal and would instead develop the area with landscape materials. If parking proved insufficient, the landscaping would be replaced with the requisite parking . stalls. 15. The south building facade will exceed the minimum length for Fire Department access, therefore, the applicant proposes providing an access along the south wall. The applicant proposes installing, with Fire Department approval, an' acceptable driving surface but would prefer a material which could support some form of lawn growth as an alternative to asphalt. 16. The building will be °L' shaped - approximately 400 feet long and between 150 and 220 feet deep. Parking, with the exception of those stalls initially (possibly permanently) given over to landscaping, will be provided north and west og the building. Landscaping will mainly buffer the perimeter of the parking areas, with small planters provided in the parking areas. ' 17,. The, applicant proposes extension of Naches Avenue through the site. It would enter the site in a north/south alignment and as it approached the north property line; it would more or less parallel, the north property line until it intersected t e proposed Oakesdale Avenue at the, West end of the property. The plan now proposed would extend Naches approximately 800 feet into the whole parcel, or approximately 400 feet north of the northern extent of the subject. proposal. The applicant would provide a temporary cul-de-sac at the road's end. 2 , First City Equities SA-057-86 & V-058-86 August 13, 1986 Page 7 18. A cul-de-sac may not exceed 500 feet in length, therefore, the applicant has requested a variance to permit the proposed 800 foot long cul-de-sac. The applicant cites the uncertainly of the ultimate Oakesdale alignment and intersection design as reasons for not completing the Naches alignment and installation with the construction of the subject proposal. 19. The applicant agreed to modify those aspects of its design which would have interfered with emergency access. 20. • The applicant has also entered in to a transportation management plan (TMP)with Metro. In general terms the TMP would require the current applicant to work with lessees and other occupants of the complex and educate, facilitate and survey employees with the stated aim of discouraging single occupancy vehicle trips and encouraging car and van pooling, and use of mass transit. The applicant would provide a transit coordinator, on-site information displays, and have tenants provide business specific coordinators. CONCLUSIONS : Site Plan 1. The proposed site plan appears to serve the public use and interest. Not only does the plan preserve trees as required by conditions previously imposed upon development of the subject site, but the applicant has enhanced an otherwise ordinary open drainage ditch to provide an additional on-site focal point. Obviously the proposed 80 foot buffer on the east side of the major access roadway, Naches Avenue, will serve as the gateway for the entire project. It will represent the applicant's concept for the complex, a well designed abundantly landscaped complex and project the main image for the remainder of the complex. 2 . While serving the applicant's aim, -it will secondarily,'- but no • less importantly,' provide a .well designed complement`to the City's image. It will also complement the area, a growing area of office, manufacturing park and warehouse uses. This complex itself will reveal a park-like atmosphere called for in the Comprehensive Plan, and one which it can only be hoped, will be replayed on the' remainder of the subject site. Illustrative plans would appear to indicate such potential for the remaining acreage. 3 . The applicant appears to be attempting to counter the prevailing trend - the conversion' of large amounts of acreage to asphalt either for parking, emergency access or simply to minimize maintenance responsibility. 'Not only will areas reserved for parking be initially landscaped but 'the applicant intends to provide emergency access over surfaces other than asphalt. While such surfaces appear untested or :discouraged, they should be approved unless there is an overriding and First City Equities. SA-057-86 & V-058-86 August 13, 1986 1 Page 8 compelling reason to reject them. Any method which encourages landscaping and discourages asphalt is to be preferred. 4. Access to the site presents no problems for the initial development. (The requested variance is discussed below. ) The current proposal will be served by both the extension of Naches on the west and Powell on the east. While staff was ' unsure of what size right-of-way would be required to serve the site, the applicant indicated that a reserve strip in a , general alignment running north/south just west of the current proposal and then generally west to the west end of the enure property would be set aside. This reserve strip should be set aside at a width of not less than 80 feet, the required width of a industrial collector. Then, depending upon the ultimate determination by the Department of Public Works, a lessor reserve could be set aside, if 80 feet is excessive. Variance 5. While the. location of the site and the uncertainly of the final design for both the alignment of Oakesdale and the 1; intersection of Naches and Oakesdale could provide - justification for a variance, the length of the proposed road is more than the minimum necessary for relief. The cul-de-sac need not be longer than the permitted 500 feet. { 6. Again, while the site is nestled against a railroad line an J. is .topographically removed from traditional access corridors thereby creating an undue hardship, the variance appears totally unnecessary for the current proposal. Even though access to the site from more than one location is necessary for emergency circulation it can be provided without the variance.. Therefore, the provision of even the temporary cul- de-sac beyond the 500 feet would appear unjustified. 7. Approval would not create any unwarranted precedent since the site is quite unique both, in location and 'in the City's' inability at this time to provide an alignment• for 'Oakesdale. Approval would also not harm either the public or neighboring properties. The road, due to the site' s location, will not affect other property. 8. The length of the road, which extends beyond the boundaries of the current proposal is excessive. In order for a Variance to be approved it must satisfy all criteria. One of those criteria is the requirement that the variance relief be the minimum necessary to allow reasonable development. As the plans demonstrate the current project, the only. one now being reviewed, can proceed without any variance. To provide both primary access and emergency access to the site, a cul-de-sac longer than 500 feet is unnecessary. The variance is, i therefore, and is denied. First City Equities SA-057-86 & V-058-86 August 13, 1986 Page 9 9. The requested variance is unnecessary for the subject proposal. It clearly goes beyond the needs of the current , site plan. Even if intended to serve a potential expansion, it remains unnecessary. Other issues such as required secondary access to interior parcels should be analyzed before any variance is approved. A complete plan for the site, either a plat dividing the property in the traditional manner or a binding site plan should be presented before a variance is approved. It is, therefore, premature to consider a variance for a cul-de-sac greater than 500 feet in length. DECISION The Site Plan is approved subject to the following conditions: 1. The execution of Restrictive Covenants providing an 80 foot wide reserve strip generally running the length of the entire 89 acre parcel, approximately 2,300 feet in length, and commencing in the vicinity of the extreme southeast corner of the subject site and terminating at the extreme southwest corner of the site, but not interfering with the greenbelt preserves. 2 . The execution of Restrictive Covenants providing for participation in area wide traffic improvements not to exceed those contained within the traffic analysis for the project. 3. Access road completion shall be subject to the approval of the Fire Department. Staff, in consultation with the City Attorney,may substitute methods other than covenants, if .possible, to bind the land and applicant and which accomplish the above conditions. The Variance is denied.: ORDERED THIS 13th day of August, 1986. FRED J. KAUFMAN HEARING EXAMINER - TRANSMITTED THIS 13th day of August, 1986 to the parties of record: Barbara Moss First City Equities 800 Fifth Avenue Suite 4170 Seattle, Wa. 98104. First City Equities 1' SA-057-86 & V-058-86 August 13, 1986 Page 10 Royce Berg, Architect • LPN Architects 114 Vine Street Seattle, Washington, 98121 TRANSMITTED THIS 13th day of August, 1986 to the following: Mayor Barbara Y. Shinpoch Councilman Richard M. Stredicke Richard Houghton, Public Works Director Larry M. Springer, Policy Development Director Members, Renton Planning Commission Ronald Nelson, Building & Zoning Director Glen Gordon, Fire Marshal Roger Blaylock, Zoning Administrator Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney • Renton Record-Chronicle Pursuant to Title IV, Section 3015 of the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 P.M. August 27, 1986. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of • the Examiner is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which ;could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make al written request for a review by the Examiner within fourteen (14) days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall 'set forth the specific errors relied upon by such, appellant, and ' the Examiner may, after review of the record, take further action as he deems proper. An appeal to. the City Council is governed by Title IV, Section ,3016, which requires that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk, 'accompanying a filing fee of $75. 00 and meeting other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection or purchase in the Finance Department, first floor of.:. City Hall. . The Appearance of Fairness Doctrine provides that no ex- .parte (private one-on-one) communications may occur concerning, pending , ,land use decisions. This means that parties to a land use decisi' n may not communicate in private with any decision-maker concerning the proposal. Decision-makers in the land use process include both the Hearing Examiner and members of the City Council. j All communications concerning the proposal-must be made in public. This public communication permits all interested parties to know the contents of the communication and would allow them to openly rebut the evidence. Any violation of this doctrine would result in the invalidation of the request by the Court. The Doctrine applies not only to the initial..public hearing but to all Requests for Reconsideration as well as Appeals to the City Council. ' ' ' ' - • '--- - ". '' • -'. - , .:f!..-',-.,';'.,.i.,,R„-t-Fiii•:,-. r,,,. •1"""`'.•"..-••••••. ' '• 1". • i•..!"•;4',.•••,;•,,i ,,.:i• . ..,-..• , . , - ; .,i ! . :•:;1.:,.-',- -.:..-,.7-1:1 f', .- - , .r. - , ... ., • -... -•..,:ii , ,,,,,, -,.,,,'..1-4- -;,,1,1;1,-,, .. . ,., . 1 . ; . , , - . •;,--,.. -:, - q-. • . - -.1.,,-' , ,- it I, . .• • , - - ;l• -•-''- ..-.1!....:P... ....1 -,-,'! ,i--- ;'' _ ,,4- --, ..- -,, - _; :.:.:-,• -,-.- -..--,-.1u.--:,,../..-,- -, — ..- . . • - - :.-- 1,-•., :„,,,- ,,. ; .- . • • , •1 .4a-j-. .-- ,;-,,,'-.-•ml--,.- ,-. : . , . • ,;_ ,..-.,-,-,-, ,f.'; i 1),,,r ,,-J.: • ' IA... , . .. ;::'''.i:' 'j.',..,'',t.'•f!;.';'..'ji..:71.il ' '' ' ' ,.5 • • , .1!,= i ' . I,'- • •1:''',''':!',17-f,,,';'.1' , ' 1 •I ,,.,,', ';i .,.1,'.,,11,,•;/..T,.,,, • ' ..','.. :. • • • ., : ..; -: .-,1,:,1,,;.-.'or:.:,!,.: : ,l•)1 •1 . .,.• •1,:::-..,.'. ',:`.-.1 -'::li'..''. .. . ' ' " .''...-"..,•'`'",• .'..-'''''''li l'' ' P 3 ' • ' . 1 ,'' :.' '., .r,'.'...,.:,k . , -• , 1', :: - 'r '-'1' '.„ ,I .`'4 'i • ,. .. . . •. •' t ,`(, . . • • - . ' SA-057-86, V-058-86 , . .- "-0...: . , . ....., ,.. .., _ ADMAC (FIRST CITY.EQUITIES) ' • • 0'. • ' "• ... ..!,- . .. ,,., • . . .••'.• ;.: • .• ' , . , . ' • " • • , o :1 . •-• • ., . . -''''i' i • i ' . . " . . • , . . • . . :. 1 1 . • i . ... _ WASHES AVE.SW . • • .. . : . . - . •. . . , . . • •. ) , 1. 4 .L. !, tifir, i -- •• . -,,,•-, '' `\4",4-. ..41-11 , •s', . • : . ft,..., .. -.) Pi.,,,./,44.-\-.."' ;.ip7,,,..q7e.7,;`,0• iiti). : ,%.1 k; ... — l•,,i't14.1 iii. phi‘,7, N...... .......-....: -,immr,-•-%.•-• V ' d.snit,- , - • • - Au. .: .-, • • • . • :i. 1:1,-Al.i.V.aw,sitknoillir'li,G1 1"-•- ----'- :::- `-'""'' . '''s i; 2 . • . '.3...:'f.'• . , ! - - . . • . . 4,4 .1 '4'' '... i .• 1 , : . . . _. . • , . . , „- . , -• , .,iv; .124 A•A •I - : '.:. f 1 . 4 4 . ., . -• — . 2 • : ''.• „.... ...•;: *i-k i 1 , 1.I .f' —- . ! • : I =se .-I • • .' ^ ;• ir1.11 di L,•:1 % a, :, ,..,- ..i.,4111;'ri'i 1 ,. . • I . . ,.. • .._ .. . ... LI iris!. ilii pi , 0 v=. , . . . .,,,,; :• :•:'1,,s•-,:-...,,ak. .a 4 3„x • . .. ,• ...41,1 : I 4 , .• :. . . . .. . • •. . IA IP.). I..1:1',../ 1 4 • . , • : ? „.... 9: : , ,••, 1 , 4 ..:N . ......<, . f : . .. . . . , . . , . Ili ,, _.4g4. 4-::ze i • : 1 ,. . . . . ...., . • illy; w----.4 , :40......*$ ,; I [..1 .__I . . • • i ali ,,. 4, I•.',rL-a-v•.• 7 ...... •.. .,• ... • • , . • . . , : fig45•! : ,,li ,a , . atiit 1, , . ' , • • ‘.. . . . . .. 1..,..,...). /)1 • . . Nrf., . • ' • . . ,.. •..,..1 :411. •-•...;1:1. 1 1 • •• ,. • , . . , . • , , .1 .,. t,.. POWELL AVE. - I , : . • • •••i I • 4 ,- . . . .,,_ .c. it . . . . . . . . . . . I .. . 1 . . •,,,,, , vrj4. 1 • • , • . . . N''''• .. . . • ,. . - . . .. ,.. ....,. . ... . ' . ' • ';'1,_.:•44:'.1•4:1 • . • . .le 'I' ,.•i 1111 :•'. _, . , 4' 1 ,•..,, 81.1 . 1.. . . .,th. j/2I,'••1.-.'•:'•',.:'',,''•--,,4,••'•:-'''':i'',f.'1:,..IIh' • 1i EBArLOeAtN EIttyE• AuIlles, * cAcCRIvERCORPORATE PARK . • . "I ,H1 . , 4 •,vZ,','k,t:t: -i.- I ' l III f• • • 1 ,- SA-057-86, V-058-86 --- " w ADMAC (FIRST CITY EQUITIES) • t '; ,�4 ;l;I I I I I I I L1II I I I I I = i _N ,a . iI', "OS r4.. /re - : '''' --:' ' , i_.' C' = is II1.41 7. 12..‘.. : 1 • -Y i I:q I ��l moo' E grit _ , / !. /,.III�II!i�- I , I o $j f i - $ f� fit' c+ �.�•.f II Is - _`_ �r•1! �• �'y. 4.- .a i1 f pssll�l�ill pi I Ilill911s i Ill I s'�I;11IP� Us n 1 t•� 1 � i1!''• s P= ►a i i I 1t.... I,. I I,11. i• �S I + , \�,:,:., T �iii j.� r ( ,11'i i I' 1 1`?i Ii I i i= gi l iil I llli 1`��f,P I c €:I:.Ii11 3 qla, ) +11�:;7°rlil, ,°L•t,! 1I MArf OA7 / I 3.. 11 II t" It° 1i! t111` I 1 i �I i ! ii.§' 11 !i t 11 i i 1 115 P•I I} i�'. rll 1 a i'' q h°'° ` i II!!s Ili• ! !1I1°I i.. iI• .,i;its Hi 0 Is, ..P sill �' I I°!3i 1 1� I ' 1i11 I I�; ri ii ! I.I °Il ! E-'11 I t i 1;'ti9 t'a i I€ii•di;i:1il iI 1 I11i+l1_Ir1i11I�II �f, ' I 11,:1• !, i I;11'.r III•i „ II,i., i it.11°,1! j11h; i,.i It 1 laIt I ty �I!11 ii S ' ,�; : I l i;1P�i I l°'t'i'i � Ili i ili,!r ...,. r l i I. 1 I Ir• t I'h l: i '. ,rn , 11! li 1!t•rj l'i !°I III,)i i" ( II lrii lii ���� 11� t t:1di 1lI-I=1II, iidStill,,.II !':I;1;9i I i!i!liitliP' �.. .r l_ 1>� ullil:.,Ii h -liii=�: Il,;iiii.=oil EI !?;-'IIsli��hlE h p IV:ilgE a rc . .._.�. ••1 I rli tart. N. i:e Ftral City E¢Wlbf ... .. f n t I r'I t"' "' RlackRiver Corporate Park '� A i of t4} ADIwAC Building • 'NerKOn,Washington: 'b '.;,. .',1 ' ,. v..'• : 141. — .1.• . . ' . . ......• . , •• . . , • :- •, - . •. . . t. . .., • ' . . . . 1.; • . . • :.1••• • . . • , . ' . . . . . ' . ... , , . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . , . . . ` . " ' -. • • ,i• . - . . .. . . , . . - . t"--- • , . . . . - . ' ... SA-057-86, V-058- .. 86 • , • ADMAC (FIRST CITY EQUITIES) ---- • . -. • . • -.r.:.. ., • - --- . . i .• . . ,. . ... .,. _. . . .. . . . , . •. • .• . .. -..; ., • . • , . . . . . . . . : . . , .• . . . . . . . . . • • . . . , . . . . , . .. . . • . . . . . . . . . . .. • . 1 • . • 1 • - .. . . . . I . , . ,• . . . II . .. • .. . • I 1!1'1. J_L_____ . i . . • • i . . , . . .. . i ,. ' 1 - 1 • Ill I 1.11111— 1 ,1 i ..„.‘ . 4 •-: I----= 5 5 , 1 . .--... ?,....1 ) • ';" "-1 ' ... I 3 1 3 111 t_ . ill• 1 • .. .. . ll . . 1 . . i . a . •.. . . . i' . .. . ' .7.r . mom . . • .. •, • . . . • • ' : ,V.I::‘,. - ' PP_.• • M IM . , 1 . , . . • .... •. . • ' IN rli 1, L. . III II 11 .. ' . . I-II:' 1 . • f I II C 7 = . I. • 9E3 . MI . • - - • . = 7 Lt m= .L1 . — .... . . . • . . • . , . . . • . ... . M , atIke I MI . . . . . .1..II . ' I . . ' . . . . • . . . , ' ' I .... .. . i . • . 4 . - ',•••.• . • . . • : . a. . 1, -t- • T . - - '-a- . a a . • sa • . -. , . • . 6 II .0 • , . • fli 'Mt CJty Egtetles Blacklilver Corporate Park x..1 .,:-:,: '''.:',.,. . . , , 1 , .., • ADMAC Building . , Renton.Woollngton.. . . • ; '• "''' ':' . ' -'''----.• _ 1 ; 'f•I Nii ��?Sfl�•1-L -ems T-s> , .-:01:J fl____ •... \\ 2jj4. '_1-''• l r�� f. :. f 4� a .2i i 1 . 11-I N • H,138r, ' • • 1 7-1".1—FLTI -:-:::-:-:-: ,,, : ••• . -.1 T s ., . 1 1.... .1.. !..t,t,,. , BSc 2_ /s. ...., i , ------0-_?C4T„e 2 .1 115 9%.,7.t. . . . . — :••••.....__Is... • : , Ir .� -,r •�•�.' I I' l -. K t,- li T l, `l _ ��, ;�>�. l . ,.,s, , '7.-'./ '�``�. �,I f f I 1 rah ti VI Yll ~'1'4y ----r,--•-- �••• • '[..;Si'i • {:;°• ...,ter rr�,lit``, •`,00• L L. r_.. L obi I ``-�.I ;��e ., t , - .t.::-.7..*--, i I ,, , . , , I I 1 { • • , .7'', _ r. .'.� _n. 'r3~ Y:]({ ���' ,, �T /�'•a�.i���, ti;I ' . 7 ----.. 4?Th..t''/ ..,c-..-- • 1 . --\ llik.. ,.::'.... .:. tore-,.a •4,WT ,, . . ..,}116 _ ____!._.o. .. ; ._::___ . %-,.! ....e. ] I V I • i,,I1 e 1 ` . M E T R i . j N I ,� 1: ,4°` er'" .4i. ri 1 • 1 �d. D 1 5 P O S AIL 1 I ca ° ?��� �'+ i , FIRST CITY EQUITIES SA-057-86 '1( V -058-86 iI . • I i '411 APPLICANT FIRST CITY EQUITIES '. TOTAL AREA ± 4.3 ACRES .. i •- ' 1, r: PRINCIPAL ACCESS S.W. 7TH ST TO PROPOSED NACHES AVENUE i rCi EXISTING ZONING M-P, MANUFACTURING PARK • ; d: EXISTING USE UNDEVELOPED PROPERTY PROPOSED USE TWO STORY BUILDING FOR OFFICE, WAREHOUSING & MANUFACTURING USES + },, COMPREHENSIVE LAND. USE PLAN MANUFACTURING PARK/MULTIPLE OPTION- - OFFICE COMMENTS •• • • . Ikl . ,. I r r • 1 3017Z BUILDING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING AUGUST 5, 1986 APPLICANT: FIRST CITY EQUITIES FILE NUMBER: SA-057-86 V-058-86 ' A. SUMMARY & PURPOSE OF REQUEST: The applicant seeks site plan approval to allow the construction of a two-story building having 93,170 square feet for office, manufacturing and warehouse uses and variance application to allow a cul-de-sac road length over 500 feet. B. GENERAL INFORMATION: 1. Owner of Record: First City Equities 2. Applicant: First City Equities 3. Location: (Vicinity Map Attached). Located on the east side of Naches Avenue S.W. at the 500 block. 4. Existing Zoning: M-P, Manufacturing Park 5. Existing Zoning in the Area: R-2, Residential-Two Family; and M-P, Manufacturing Park 6. Comprehensive Land Use Plan: Manufacturing Park/Multiple Option - Office 7. Size of Property: ± 4.3 acres ' 8. Access: S.W. 7th Street to. proposed Naches Avenue 9. Land Use: Undeveloped , ; ' 10. Neighborhood Characteristics: North: Undeveloped Property East: Undeveloped Property ' South: Manufacturing/Office Uses West: Undeveloped Property . C. HISTORY/BACKGROUND: . ' Action File Ordinance Date Annexation 1745 Apr. 14, 1959 * Corrected --- 1756 May 19, 1959 * Corrected --- 1928 ' Dec.. 12, 1961 Rezone (G to ) R-432-79 --- --- Rezone (G to' M-P) R-129-80' 3694 Dec. 24, 1982 Lot Line Adjustment LLA-013-84 --- Sept. 23, 1983 Preliminary Plat PP-089-84 --- Dec. 4, 1984 . Special Permit SP-090-84 --- Dec. 4, 1984, Variance V-091-84 ---' Dec. 4, 1984 Special Permit SP-024-86 --- May 20, 1986 D. PUBLIC SERVICES: ' 1. Utilities: . a. Water: A 12-inch water line is located along S.W. 7th Street and along the-proposed Naches Avenue S.W. II PRELIMINARY REPORT, TO 'J. . HEARING EXAMINER' ,., , ;, FIRST CITY EQUITIES,, FILE SA-457"-861V-058-86 : ., AUGUST 5, 1986 PAGE 2 b. Sewer: A 12-inch sanitary sewer.'line, is located along S.W. . •7th .Street and along the proposed Neches Avenue 'S.W: , c. Storm Water Drainage:• .• Storm water. flows intoi'the Black River drainage `'system. . 2. Fire, Protection: 'Provided by the City of Renton as per ordinance requirements. ' • 3. Transit Metre transit'.routes No 199, and .No., 340 operate along S: 7th Street to '. d Avenue" S.W.::a roxi tel i 0:4` of a mile' �a. p y southeast 'of the subject,-property:: 4. Schools, ',. ';, ,' ' ; , a: Elementary Schools: "•'N/A • , , , b: Middle':schools': N/A. ' c. High"Schools` N/A' ;• 5. Recreation:; N/A - • ' E. APPLICABLIE SECTIONS OF THE ZONING CODE: • ' , 1._ Section 4-730,, Manufacturing (H-P). ' ' 2. Section ;4-722(G), Variance. ' 3: Section:4-7:4(Fi.(2) Landscaping Requirement - Green River. 4. Section' 4-738, Site` Plan`•Review F. ,"APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE 'PLAN OR OTHER OFFICIAL CITY • - ' DOCUMENT:r E , , . ,3 , 1. , ;industrial Ggal `a 0,O.tdectives, City 'of Renton, Comprehensive Plan , • Compendium,,,March 1986,-;,p. ;18-19. ' 2. Green River,,Valley;:Policy Plan, :City of Renton, Comprehensive Plan Compendium, 'March 1986 ` p. 31-50. : . ' G. DEPARTMENTAL ANALYSIS:. ' 1� F The applicant,' kirst'Cityr;Equities,. is requesting site plan : • approval-,to`:allow, the, construct f ion o a building,;centaining 93,170 ,square,.:feat:on' a`4.3 nacre'parcel.: The:Qapplicant is .also requesting • • a;'var•iance °to.allow:the-.construction':of; a cul-de-sac' stroet .(Dachas Avenue `S W.):;that, exce(.0s.;;500 feet in; length: ° . 2. The. building ,site;•is.:bein g.des'10ned to allow,the futule expansion - of the busines ,s :.ADMAG: .-: The to w story structure, will bp,, constructed°of ;painte4 concrete panels along with reflective 'and tinted glass.:' ,The'intent of. ,large.:expanses of glass:''is :to ,.reflect the natural vegetationpreserved.;that the applicant'.proposes ' ` creating along :the; southern.boundary of the property ' 3. • A fifty 150)' foot; wide.i:andseaping,•strip has;been set aside to. continue and enhance the' "natural!:preserve" that was' required to . the west of .the` subject,.•site:as part of the Black River: Office Park ' . development:proposal:.`'"'The`'4reinagea system will:.tbe ,developed into an': amenity:. , • 4. The Environmental "Review ,,Gommittee ,issued .a Mitigated Declaration of Non-Sigpif.icancebased ,upon the fact' that .the' applicant would ' dedicate and construct'Neches Avenue S•.W. „from S.W::. .7th S treet-,to the,temorary",cul-de-sac'to,.the'=north associ• ated the Building:` ;The''appeal';period"Will' expire`et 5:p;m. ,on ,July 31 1986. ' 5. Various City Departments,, rev;iewed,the-,.proposal. The..Police ' , • Departmentand'Building. Divisioti..."Of.,the,Building and-Zoning ' Department recommended approval Without conditions tthe I other department 'comments;,are':'as follows: , PRELIMINARY REPORT TO T_ HEARING EXAMINER , FIRST CITY EQUITIES, FILE SA-057-86/V-058-86 " AUGUST 5, 1986 PAGE 3 • POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT: APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS July 9, 1986 ' 1. This proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan land ,use designation of Manufacturing Park/Multiple Option (Office) and the existing M-P.zoning•for the subject site. It is also compatible with the existing land uses in the vicinity. 2. It should be a condition 'of approval with the Hearing Examiner that all significant trees (particularly the Douglas Firs ,located in the southeast corner of the site) be retained as much as possible and per the concurrence of the City's Landscape Architect. ' 3. The request for variance on the cul-de-sac appears reasonable and not detrimental to existing uses; provided, however, that it is for a specific limited time and is definitely to be replaced with a permanent full connection to Oaksdale Avenue. TRAFFIC ENGINEERING DIVISION: APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS June 30, 1986 Participation in latecomers for traffic signals at S.W. 7th and Hardie and Powell and Grady." Applicant shall determine traffic volumes (AWDT) from this development assigned to each of these intersections. DESIGN ENGINEERING DIVISION: APPROVED WITH' CONDITIONS Powell Avenue S.W. does not appear that it will be extended any further to the north. Therefore, the cul-de-sac 'which was temporaryy should be completed to include curb and gutter drainage and sidewalks together with any other, necessary appurtances. UTILITY ENGINEERING: NOT APPROVED ' July 11, 1986 Sewer Latecomers Fee - HDK $81,471.82 Water and Sewer System Development ' Charge of $0.04 per square foot $25,215.44 , " $12,607.72 for each Require over-all vicinity map showing all phases of Black River Technical Park with square footages written in each parcel. FIRE DEPARTMENT: - ' • NOT APPROVED ' 1. All weather surface required for Fire Department access. 2. Bollards not approved for use'. ' 3. Parking not allowed on emergency access road. ' 4. ' Access easement from Powell Avenue .S.W. .must be in prior to framing. All Fire 'Department access'roadsmust be all weather , surfaced with asphalt/concrete prior to` framing. , VARIANCE/V-058-86 (Allow a cul-de-sac street over 500 feet in length) The following analysis shows that the variance request is appropriate with the four' (4) criteria under Section 4-722(G). 6. That the applicant,suffers undue hardship• and the variance is necessary because :of special circumstances applicable to subject, including size, 'shape, topography, location or surrounding of the subject property, and the strict application of the Zoning Code is found to deprive subject property owner of rights and privileges enjoyed by other property owners in the vicinity and under identical zone classification. _ . , . , . • • .. ' • ' . .,_ • , ,...... PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE 'HEARING EXAMINER •: ' : •. •• -•.'' ,,,F,,••• i• • ., FIRST CITY i EQUITIES,. FILE SA-057-'-86/V-058;-86 • •P - , • - ; - • . .. --_. , .:AUGUST 5, 1986 • . , ,, .': : : , ' ..* . . , • . - I. . -, .• '' PAGE 4 .. . :: ., . , . . • . ., , . . =•,, ., , . . . , . . • ,. , • . .. , . . The hardship 10 created by the.tlY size, 12) Yahape, and (3) location of the property. The ADMAd site is the southeastern most lot in the development of Black River Office Park The total' industrial/office parkA.S"e!very unusual long •'- ire0g4larlyi' shapeii4erpel because of the preservation of a . _ , portion of the netpralriparien. foreStasSoCiated with :the old , -, , . , • , .. Black River chentielt•-!•5 ,.'AceesiyiS ,fUrther limited by the fact that the: entire northern boundary Of .the office park is bordered by railroed tracks. ':' ''•:: ' '-, \' '', • i' •••:, '" , . ,; • 7 That the granting Of the variance will not be materially ' detrimental to 'thepubli'e Welfare'or injurious to the property or . Improvements -iiv'the vicinity and zone in•whieh:the'subjeet property is sitliated. . , ; •,,,' ',.: • --,. .•. ,,,,,,,: , ,, :, . : . , 1 the Fire Department has implied that unless the ,roadway access is:Installed Prierte'the /construction .of framing of the • , . .• - . building thatthere,wili be';ia'materially detrimental impact upon the spbject.prop9rty'. .!,-,,,Tt.,appeare that if the emergency access OPeStion, setiSfeOtorililapSWered then the proposed Veriapce, will not create gi:•a4Ceii ,problem•-.-,:. . , ,• ,, , :: , , , . . : . , , , • , . . - ; • : .- A,problem will exist if' the development of the reniailder of the, Black River Office Park is not developed'';,alting,With the • 1ntepded,.,e*tePtiOn' of Neches,,AV'enlie 's W. to !Oial;doalia:Avenue , S.W. ''':',‘- ,.': ' : • - . -:.' :. : : '', : 1 '• :' ::, -.',' . : • :',,, , : Therefore,-:it :is suggested till-4 at iClilininiOto the epPlicant. grant to the City of.4tOntop-.prior4ejssu0Oce.: 0f P-builq0g . • per*it',e•perMinepti•eserVetiop for the location of a ' , .,'•-•.'' . . industrial...:collector':street.' •''' .: ''... •;-: ,, - • ,:-:...- .::' .• , ',,,.-•••: P ••• '" •t• - •,:: -•,: i ':,•,..':•7,,_,'- ',"...`• 3: ', ' ' : '':':' ''_• '•'.: '• '; • .•, ' : . , . . 8. That approval hall pot constitute a grant of special Privilege inconsistent With the limitation upon uses of Other-'Properties in the vicinity and zone In which the .subject property is.' situated: The• subject site is so unique that we do not have a:comparison ' with other properties in the v).`oinitir...:,..It2.may grant a special • .privilege,. but it it' is•the only way'to utilize the subject site Without,::deVelOpingthe entire street '''''' • . '. '- ' , . . ' 9. That the approval SO :,404rn464 1;r:si. .0:ie' x4r4Oer or Board of • . , ..., .. . ., . Adjustirtortt is a minimum variance that will,: accomplish the desired ' - , ,• pur-P9P§•, '.•:., ',. ., ' . ,i ":' ''' :.' s , :• 4 , .•'•:: ''• ' , I , , ' . , . : ' , • . „ , , I , Biased'.ppop the -desigti-and ..t.40.•f'act that the ;ADPIAC- project is • , . . , . . . .: the next logical extension of Neches :AVenpe ,S.W.; the variance ; Oclup00,341i,s ,Oie minimum pecesSery. to-,sillow emergency access te'.;the ,subject site , .. , '':: • ' , , .: ' ' : , ', • • . r. . SITE PLAN/SA-057;86 - :... -:. -r ::. '1- . .,". ' '' , ^ , :, •: :- , , . . . . . . ., . . . . . . 10. The applicant has not provide calculations supporting the on site ' . Parking' shown in the plaps. :The applicant will have to provided them during the public heating Process' to assure the city that the Site is actually being used as a manufacturing/office facility - instead of purely office.', The, site plan as present complies with • the specifics of the - Zeping Code. The 93,922 square feet building is divided, in function and requires parlii..4 t*s.ed14pOiv:the' .. ...- - , following analysis •• :.'', , . '• ''' , '. ':.` ',:. '‘,.•••• . ;• ,• • ':, : ,,, , , • , , . , , . • ,• .,. , ., . . , . . . , , • . . ' ... , . . . , . . . - . . • , , •. . .. . , . • - • i /". •• ' ' '1 I % ' i. ' ..... " ' ' ." . . r A • . L . • . • ' , ' . , . . r , 1 .. I' l ,:j1; PRELIMINARY REPORT TO Tam" HEARING EXAMINER i{ ;,. FIRST CITY EQUITIES, FILE SA-057-86/V-058-86 ' AUGUST 5, 1986 PAGE 5 • 11. Section ,4-738 (D) provides the basic site plan review criteria. . It appears that all. are complied with: i j a. Conformance with the Comprehensive Plan, its elements and ' policies; b. Conformance with•existing land use regulations; c. Mitigation of impacts to surrounding properties and uses; d. Mitigation of impacts of the' proposed site plan to the site; //e. Conservation of area-wide property values; f. Safety and efficiency of vehicle and pedestrian circulation; g. Provision of adequate light and air; Mitigation of noise, odors and other harmful or unhealthy conditions; �i Availability_of public services and facilities to accommodate the proposed use; and j . _ 'Prevention of neighborhood deterioration and blight. ISSUES: • 11. The primary design issue deals with off-site construction of • access. The City must be assured that Naches Avenue S.W. is ' constructed to connect S.W. 7th Street and Oaksdale Avenue S.W. Even though the proposal is acceptable for both primary and emergency access at this time, 'the issue of when should Naches Avenue S.W. be completely installed is critical and must be addressed at this time. The applicant appears to be developing the property in small parcels without going through a formal subdivision. This is legal as long as they retain ownership of the land. A condominium plat or a binding site plan approval could be completed on the property. The applicant should commit at this time to designating and permanently reserving the necessary right-of-way for the Naches Avenue extension. The applicant should be required to construct Naches to minimum emergency access standards at the time of development of the next parcel to the north. The parcel immediately west. of Naches from the subject site possibly could be accessed without the complete extension of Naches. . Tie applicant would have to present supporting information at the time of development. ` 12. The Public Works Department has commented that the applicant should participate in latecomers fees at the intersections of S.W. Grady Way and Powell Avenue S.W. and S.W. 7th Street and Hardie Avenue S.W. These latecomers agreements areoffical documents of the City and bind the applicant. 13. The traffic engineering report prepared by The Transpo Group • recommended mitigation for the entire Black River Technology Park (pages 24 to 27) . The Environmental Review Committee did not require implementation of any of those improvements at this time; however, the issue is Whether this project should eventually pay its proportional share. The study suggests it should, but there needs to be legal conditions imposed requiring participation. Therefore, we would recommend the filing of restrictive covenants requiring participation to their proportionate share of the identified mitigating measures. The Transportation Management Plan should be implemented at this time. PRELIMINARY REPORT TO '=.� HEARING EXAMINER '• • . _ � i...l i 1 , I �f y ,.; ;FIRST CITY EQUITIES, FILE SA-057-86/V-058-86' ; , • . AUGUST. 5, '1986 - PAGE 6 . H. DEPARTMENTAL RECOMMENDATION: " , • • Based upon'the above analysis it is recommended that the Hearing Exam ner ,approve,:,the.spite.=.plan request,' file SA-057-86; ;and variance request, file V-Q58-86., subject to ',the following': conditions: 1. :'Executiof of res'trictive.'covenants requiring participation in future taffic 'imprpvements. • , :!"):' . `2. Constructl'oi '.of Nache'-`Avenue.S..411,,,and :the; emergency` access road 1', '� ' from:Po'iell' Avenue; S•`,W ':`prior to: framing; of;:;the: buildirig: 3.' The preparation and filing of a legal ,doc}iment that'permanently • ' L; ,Leaerves,r.the`�ieceasary;,,r ght-of-way for, the. consl rut on'sof Neches L - ' Avenue _S.:`W. .fr'om:;S;.W ''7th;'Street`:to Oaksdale' Avenue.S::W1••"for'aid, - 'iridu's ria1 -collector"arterial. ' . . • • r• • • • II I • t . 9 r, __ram `i• 'i, f T •\ '17 1 ,„- ICJ \ 'c, 0� -E4CON- �4V _ .7 .. `,81, • t' •fit t t r f, • f�@', \\(l"\ •� It . 1 IT ' a • s. • ' . ' iI _sEq TT 2 ^ 1 2Is �O t • • • i 41 _ 1 4 \ , e { - L -.1.',, ,Q/�'- , •.hay I( ti •1. i ' 11 14'4 y- 77—---1__ ' ."*---‘-7.---:._j.: . . i[, , ', vy/flpfif ,..,..,:2_,,Lii j 4,.. is ;:.r_ ,t • P�4 I ro uc - 1 ' ' , Apo • /o ' 1 ►ai I i � 1 .' Alcor ,,4 .... .13.-,2 tffv, - ,it.,.;:s . ..:...;;Aio/pikc LI ' , °AD • AI ' --1.1- , , , , , _......., . ,.. ; �,_ - -- - \,' :r : am.;., �.•••- . 4. • , _ t ti I\ ' -- I 1 ' ') ' • .w• 1 Z 1 v v I I N. . D I S P 0' S A I .L. \ L ', . o.�� S,o • 1 I ���T`T bf Trtif(TIIIIFJ' •�.Ir .1 • FIRST CITY EQUITIES ' SA-057-86 , V —058-86 ' APPLICANT FIRST CITY EQUITIES , TOTAL AREA ',-' 4.3 .ACRES PRINCIPAL ACCESS S.W. 7TH ST' TO PROPOSED, NACHES AVENUE . - ' - EXI•STI.NG ,'ZONING•'.,. M:—P, MANUFACTUR-ING 'PARK , • EXISTING USE UNDEVELOPED. PROPERTY • PROPOSED USE ,TWO STORY BUILDING -FOR OFFICE, -WAREHOUSING & MANUFACTURING USES • COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN MANUFACTURING PARK/MULTIPLE OPTION. — OFFICE - COMMENTS �F. I • " • yrt Mi® iik°JIj . ! • • .0 ••• • • • °; — ®®• :°0000 o° li • O •'• O •' • •I O e3 • 0000• ', `''' 1,x.°p000p000 •,O >O • • •1• O 'to ° Irig°::°.°°.:111111111.11110go °°O ,e '..°po 0000° O O O' a • • •:♦ O} i1 1,,, o o o ,1 .f:�: 000 g o �.. ` r u_e1 .° �oopopo 000 ti F c .rn , • e)'{A • i -.Hero.III dab. ;° o 000°opopoo••'.:. O -0:•• �.`4 `�< ulr O '• O LO O 1. \\\rl:h ® ° .�,. 7.: � op00000000. , •t\c ■II■ /1' �rnua� �°' el.• o 0 0 o G "• O axb.g�z a.:.. ulrl��'',o ••it.�C• , /„ �:11r6 ;° Ill 1 �°0°0°0°0°0• 'J. O.O';• 0,•=—•- .ns ,• i1 • � ;. yr o0000 :?. It �► �s\®`_ _�. ''i o0000000000' p•p'p• 1 }$QRIr O A O i�Yr�� �. • ' O°OOOOop000opop°p° ( 7•rl�� •.' • p1000.00.0.0.0. 0000 P v — ••• !r-a I�• `- -'' ::r • 0°000o000p00° Qp,�((//.,0,,1 ew 3 a'r!f. V'I Vl Q •a 000OUO°O°0°OOo,3 Y'p• • C: o ▪ J lib o 0 0 0 0 0 0 `� °o' �t1,�1. ellr Sz O■ 00 0000• rllr, nl/ \ EMI : t'y , °p00000°O0oo000. o ■u■• -' is!J . • v `3'• t' / 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0•" •Is $T' - erl o0000000` •000 1. o0 000000 ° 0 •II•is a •.t :V;• ,•p0000�, •, 1 er1,. o 000 0 0 0 0 0 0 ' o r111 uB1 ,r.. °o°o°o°o° �t, . o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0/ °0 0 0'( rllr lipTif.?:. ■rU t4 .r,Il�ro�o.,} � ' �� eiiisiii �r,11 aft,.,:,' <•• rkAiz d-.,p�+ l�gern pppppp° InCrr y`"� alr f� Te �.� rL�, [) O (77.7 .• • • r�ir rrrr•p°pdpo°o°opo IrAIrrrrtV 4 'f•„' - K Ax, (► _ ip I i6i iei�°O°O°°°O°O° n• lorrllrrs + }{ , r .f t 0 0 0 0 or IrrrrllrrrrI Yr■rrrr\ O O o O O r� Irree110/I � :Sy,•r•O o 4• 1 >•A i`r„t Irrr ...� .+n nrrmrrp,att'o• 7 , ... r""'�t• <. • ', :p�'n:<�i� '+•'. .. rb N ar'■ I■urr1.;anrl tlrrllrt;o° I;- .nu_ ?: ?D O •f, •,, t�•cp c a?!•. ® iugtrrrrrrr� "•1"l.'rtllrr in `- ', ' - ® :< ' ,�n'.in4 ,`♦":I�.: ��]rO rrrrrrrrr_rrrrllr r�r'.r■rrllrrrl�,�=f.• - r4�� .o ®® tt 9. , .>. ur.�nr<_ vcA K it�emar.i 1 � ., ne renu if'` •., •��.,•.;;, 1 ,. o•, "! /J le, ►r11Zwen?t'..•:rrn ■rar.wrr..err; �' ; ,c 1•. j.; i"l , ,p F ,.•t �/ ,(iLarrerrr'Vrz./m ',•,rell.rerr'•mr!QIIOr, :a:;•'.F.: •., • l •amity' _ • t' .� .� II: .y 't1 (�� r1 rrrr. .--_ es! r n' t t\ ••7... `)-r,- -- - - r, -"_.�_ .tom _.__:. d: •-,' /�• ,1(,•,j• L,�1"�' • •r' --__-_ .r _ err'. \' '(„ r>•, v•li f< 6 ' ' :::.:::,-:::.:::.!.•:::.•:.::.•:.::.•:.:::.•::i::-:ii'.::..'. .•.•...II i 1.4■ -•„_.--..2-7..'-'-_-:-.---__:"--L..--,.----- - :tuurrrrroee,•ns-.r• •• a�� .t :, i�t (rrrr, 2 o• - r u■ I' aer r •r f. r` n •�. 1 \� • 950. [[yam "K v c - 1 <lt.' 1 , —.•• _ems.-,, a c„=• _ '-- `-_- --'-c-�_ --- =ernrr iei � �c407, 4. ,/ .' • ?"�:.j`i \ .. - -a __ .;t r..__- =-- ___ �O�•e�l� °O x. --•-c-�f .• `` • 0000 ,.'_- 11I10, •:oo• _ =Y'-' _�:=, _ _ ■rrrrrrl 1 pop s '0000• illigMMMMM •, 0000• '•1- - _ 00000•` • - __ �-•-• ---- ■ 1+•Irrrrrl •°o° rrrrr7ilr• ! • • °O •00• �r r, --_ -= 000000�` _•-..., ^-___ o orO err0 ` k`r 4 p oo,, I� ----_ >•000000000 �.-\, 'R/ L_ -a-i i, i,.✓°IiitE ` „.•C': ' 4,, __ - ' r 00000.0.00 =-- -1 W� t. . : x : ® s•!•t f .tC 9• ----- OOo00000000"` --'- - •l^-i�Y .; '1 ;?;;•; 1•.,cr'f•: n �,• Q� '00000000000•'J ::• {��.:4 00000000000..c., »�1 -_--- _ /�- �'1� r ;J z ,,: ;i1: �I7S9%�. --_ ':•000000000000••d !J•n�l + r!- ( 1 `.Y. r J•C�.''' u.; :u^.-cc,•5,`..- C '.�: a�• VO°o°oo°0°0°00°0°0°00°oo`.i:=t ---- tii„�t 1 ��_'•?Is�.� i I, 3 1'C �''':K' i E3"1>',.`; 1 :ei•ot, • -4000000000000000 ,r =_ �}R't n,7�� ' _ t.E <<;,. \• o000000000000 . _P .••1`- � �' � ,,v,..• •Ei•c.•. + 5i •�' 000 '• •. •-•-- !� � Imo•( o, i (i'., :U� 5(••'Si,,` •000• l' •• 00 D•,• •, 6 -'._I•-. —'fir{r.. Yn .., r,,+ , •000• - " •.�, i .•V•Sig ,' _- �P. .eurrrreurnr - ---- ---- ' : it, t.'" ' ii:ItilrbililiMINIO‘\'-'--.7--_.-- 144"- XI M BAN ��®•�,• Ile■'I mamma'"t - ` =1'•rs )\Et. �;•f - ,. ( naruurrnurlru -- �I, e - ®''''',o ,, .. , ...,_____„" • 1 I.. •'^•' • IIIIIIe is - - - 000 -- ,�i',�.tr.,:'.. Sf�•:;;:; :�•t'r. :. • •.•. 000 • f )O ,meow mate UUrr■NEB Ede■ � - ---- 0000-_� '•,,, {' oao .'.r• - _ ___'_'0000•- _T-_I:•�i._,,,. at i,.: 000•-- '• ',;-. ... I ',VI, 111e10 - --• :' - • ' q 1r.Crrr rrrrrt 111r11 %X!T — _ _- --_- -�' �;?a:' 1 •�'F• fi:. ll Ilrrrrl''-:•,111r11 11 iii __ -_ ---- •?'.rC,^ T, 'r;• ~-T�■rllerrrL�S.111r11 II i `'_'_ • - -__ �:.... .. • .�,. '116'rerrl4:�IIIrt'U /AIr / -- -F'-. -- c •�4$.nf_'r • __ �y�• ..__ ' ,liF•1m:i '::.'.IterO\,Eoe!/IIUrrrrt:3,i -- -- - .. I. ''Irrrer £ r 1 Irr\. I rI r,(.' • ,ry noA',•v' '•,C 000000 ', K = - 0000 ,f�1 00°000 !: I'` Anil' t•�11 ..tir 11 °�-- - - -_ -_=_-_ .Poor, '0000.�Q' :,.Y',' t 000000•j rr.lre 111 i.'," I ----• ------- •''b ' °°000•:} yV : o000000 , • 7�1,• `f.jimrl•mr6 'C>^ e1 v --- -- 1': •0000. 'p 00000°•• ; 4..1.1■9■ f ell eererrrrrlirrrrr.o•:= EV ! -——--- _/•,` 00000 0000000 1i �r7;•, ' • Irrrraal . 4,- 1tl errr„,_-.anA R-- -_ �- tyt- '-_- .,C.� •000. °00000.• ;e,r o saran is'c'.y, 1 }—.erlV- 4_=_=_ _ ?�(11- a:p• 1 ': • I&0X0X : �, -Y.. _- -  =_ _- fir@ 1Y 0 -\r 1ur,•ramrraurerrru e:-,=-- ----- -_-- ---_-_-_ ',2•:` i tl ,�te::..,imerrrerrrer son '� r1 • =__ _ =y - .o . 1 •i,' � !IL'„'•Irerrd■ ■Ml.l•gierrit P :�w '," -_------ -_ • - , �.r ,c• y ',, _A0l'-^-,<="�•'•�1I1IIIe=IlB1I�1•,•�'?r'.=3:-`r"-'' _-__-__—_'_ _- -1.' =_'1�,, �:j i _ v,•, • `',I. ------ - '•- • O .:0 `0 � —_- _- —- LTA_ :.I' __-_;___-t-om_ , _. �•_�h-.;.- ::r - $Ingle Family Et ` i )_ r�- _- _- b • Comm,er,cial. ' •• Li , -_ (r' 'P' 4 ,d'. .. 'S:' t % • it i -•=_= =___=__ •• how' Density ��I ---__ ;� _r -- a Of ficei / Office Park --- r _ IIAu'Itl,-Fam6 • _ .1 n /. pa o0 0000, i _ _ • ■�1 C py� 0000°°° Pubbc%'Quasi •Public _- _ tr ,.,.. • 1VOu� I-"rallID •0°0°0°o°OppO • - - ro F. lj +,. ,. 00 • f i ;ez> s 4 t,� :.:> ° Light-!ndia tri ' �:•�` Multi=�arYey. 9 s r al , `• 7,• • Recreation' ' °0'0 Heavy •Industrial • .. • ,, :�Y..• Greenbelt _ _= Manufacturing•• Park •, • / -Multiple:. Option kz'' i' ,fit • t ..,,. ...•.,.•. O O O O Off,,1' � c' O�opo 00000000000 08.. ,j O.O O O O O O O O .,,,, iot .'ES O O 0001 O O C 'J 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 �"' 0 000000 Q `I '' 0000000 O O 0 O O 0 O �; ;0000000o0o0oope ' V, `Y�i : f''d',, �'t_ Z ti ' 47.1' , , rl ,i; • ._ . ._,_ • • . . • . _ --. . . .. •. . . • • . .• - '....,_•- -- -,.. ,. - . • . • ,. ... ...... . _ k \ \ _ _.. : _ . .. „, ... ... - . ,.._ . ••-. - . • .. --TABIAATION- ' __ . _ _ - - \ . • . ' .. ' . 21127.1.171Z.....'"`M=7""....1...."'..,7711:11 •- _ . • •_ . . /- --1":----. ._ • . . • -.....___ . _____. _. isp -- 1,1,7=7:41.17.g.'"ar.7:.".Z.Z.':7.%"""'A' ' ,- . . .'' s.••-' .. : -:. - - __•edion62•71.• , Genre 93,170 sp. . 11r.‘741•7.:51.1rE"L'`"•"7:1.9"7:::,'%'''re?•:;75"-",110 . ' . ._ ..............141t,...,.....A.,fr,...4.3..ia: . ' • , _ •. - % , Foc414.14 6E1400 5F. 147.11•4:=44417A Tr.:"":4,!;* `"'"'".' . -\ \ • ' ---- .-: % =Y-7A."="ra:11.41"4411142.24:11=1: , _ .__. _. _ . . _ . ' • - 1 -- 11 -- _ _ . _.. \ .- , . • . ..•\ ' . . ,.- •- -- . • . .. Ccasze1PatIng _ 48 • • ,., , * ,, , • . ..w. . . ' • . . _. L.. • 41810401w 202 . . :- - ' t • - . .-- , - * ' •.,` - , • . ., ..... `"1.7.47.:14.1:1;7=7.7 LI&'.17..T...•7.:44`: H • - . . . . . .- . - . ..:. . - . , . -. , _ . . •- Eir:tr.Ultar.::,T.T."=".W.".:P.-.7.::•"""" -_ - - - -'- -: \ '0 '''' ioniZ. r". _ . .‘ ,,....-... ,_ _. _.__. ., _. ._ . _.. . _ _- .... . . ._. ..._,_ _. 2 , , _rge...„...,. ,j,...- , . - .: - . ... .,_ ' • L.\\. .: _ . . . ..,- ,• 0 CO El 1 \I .• .. . ' .- ..,- ,' Cl. , - ,- , . . . LO•171 1 ' \ ,1 . . „• : - • - • ' 11...'...7.1:: . . • . .. CD C.). - 006,401: .• • . ,,, .. .. . , ., •. - , ., . ::: . .. . .. Finite Phase 0- • -_ ..r.-- \ .. , - - T.-::":-.-111.7:..11.-Zr.t.m7;i:77;7•=e '' 0-CD .. . , . . ...lip . . 1:444.B.T2itra-WiffIlli147::41.:'t7:41 . , ;s • r• ....... \\\\\. ..„ . . • . . .—. •- ' V....-- . . .. . .r4 ., ,... .-.• • -., - ..• ,.- - \ - : . . - " - : '.' . . - • "7'''' ,--7"—,.............. • • 0.51; .. _ _ .___,. .._ ......,_ , .. . - ..-_ .. . . . ,. .---.-. ....-. .-..,-,.. .. r........:„...rar.ra.-...-mm--=,:-..=•arin: Is,-,,, a LI.0.8 _ _,.. . .., ..,. . . .. . . I"-- - A ... . - . . • --....,...............- . • . . . . Ln ci , •, - - - . ... . -• =.-..-mr..44=rz.:.-4,,.................. .. :,5 0 :e.-,•_, . . ;:gurvx4:4-mr.,.:r.;•:;;Z::4.7':.7",,OL'al .. , \\ . , . ... ........ :.. . . . . , it4 A . . 1 \ tV ' - , ,. .4(,,- 1005.37. - - . ' . • • cn itt .' \ - ,‘, ------. ---:.___— , ---andr-air. niscr.---- : ' . • _ LEGAL DESCRIPTION .. _ 4_ ••••• , . i 1 I I ,,,,'. I ... • - '•• ......:, • , ....--IIIIIIIIINNI4Illmakr- - , ll . \_ __I____ . • %. •, -Phase I -• -I- • ,- - -•• - - - e • -•,. • - •411111111124141'ogirt.-,,, 1.1. V ' 1 r I •'t, r \...- .5..L, - 2...74.„... ...A...4—z'- 7-- 7 li 11,i) I IL III r — .„ -,,,:141141111.1r ler-1 ••=*- is, ?• Irr...,,.. _ .. " • .: A--------_-__.> .( • \or . . . ,. 30.0 J • 6 , •,. • . . •...i....L. ( • -_, -- , ., .."------ - - I THIIIIIIIIII .,--,..-- \ .0— ....,..... ,..• - . . ? 1 __ : WANTON 0.M. . . 1 .e, r\• i ,,.. 0 ,,.., _ i i ....,it....A.N.Q.,..4 ,....... . . • .' .•- . . . • - ' . . .. . .-.. . - .-,,," - • -:--. ..'''' "' • 'i 1 N..( ItEin r •\ i;t 1_1 , .m, • -,-, - - .- . , • 1 - _ -'N3 .iil fig ' .*-- _:__-- ____. \ .. . 3..: . ,.1-• iTX • iii, .. • . ,t ' • s _-.1 . ADMAC Building _ • 41 • VICINITY NIAP No Seals ' , ,,, . . • _;re_ 1 - ., -,,' • ' T, • ' .F7'N _. . '-'..- '''. . . ' '' - . II , . . ,. ' ' - Z a. . ., ,--.1A(1.017. j i • • , . . i•,. — . ... ,, : _ _________ I :1!-:.fir,..Z.7.4''P' •. . ..^ • crrr rtfrIr=j „ ., .,., . . • , • . . . - :.' - • .' ;';',..-Kr-''''.-/.42--:''' - -:-I I r- 4- -----(_-_-_:.-tfebdiiips. Reserve . = . • -------r---- r-r7P'. 1.")4 : :!1:1;404. ii 1 anur•P°1dng_ -s.. 1 '.'tt4, . . . . , 6.“...R.R.,ES) 0...14 . . -. . “ . i , / .1r—Firf 1; ti—t— , ,,,„.4 • --: 1—,....,. ... -- --k". - • 1 ? 1 I I • -''- - '4.0.4”.,;,' .1 IT tr.— - --``''''''g. , i ----•1-30' . , -„ . X- •---.71--•--- , *.A.M1P.V.12.----..-,.., ,,r4___. _.„....._,........______ ..I ...-----.----' .6.3 1.4iids:1:404--jr-11111- Ar44-21221::•; '') ' , '• ' . " •OOP . .,.......__... ''. - • 'I C...”:I SITE PLAN ....., . ..T. ...71.;*-.......__,. Al I. - 1, 71: ; , .,' • - . : - -- - -- '-- 4- ,- • --, -• .. . . • . .-_.•• _-11-__ • , - - .- . ,..„ __ •,,,i4.• -,, :_. -_, • t ''''C"'"1-r. <- .._17 .,...,_..,- ----.,..,...q0 "..., ...'"--4- ........._... ,....., .... ,...,.........,...4 , e ,.." ,v,----41 — . • - . . . . , • -v......1.•ea noel ....;--. .,;.--.!. ,I1<-?' .... • • " • ,____ - -i-, •-1 I k; - , . . , q.;/ ;------ I i - . ! . r :-- .-----,,... 4... I .AR NO.08007 SPRET ie0 OP , . - i_J _.., . t " I . am .0-0-•• • .1. =,... . , SITE PLAN 1/301 • cloca• . • . , .. . . _ . . . . • _ . . ...• • • - . , . • . i , . 4'r} y • • , ` SA-057-8�i► V-058-86 1 i.; AD kTkC;r (FIRST' CITY:;EQUITIpS),. 1; • NACi gSAVE.AV,E. SW II, 0,,, . m.aar, 0 ram'.. ,,,, .J.1 i•i ..0 :. " , iii8;4 ft a ,, �' 11 -=� `Y •'11 ige ' tecir'41412-111-tialWrritileARIV=455%, i'v‘;'; • • • t� ft ;, �c. _ • Jift'.1`ss v'.'. !.•';'•',..:''' '',1:11 -;,.. $1:, ' ,',. 1 '., : •". . ..'1 1.41‘r 0 ti°44.4"%"1 liI6-.l''''.i '%::'''' ' '.' •:!':::.: :' , '' • .A:11 , .!, • • . • �?Icf,ty �, . -.. r 1� :„..„,....,,..q.:1',I.,•1i1. , ,i i , `tQ'tJ 'tom �`,i .. ..•.. ,,, F, ,' . • „ --•,.. , .,,. 1.]. 1, . , .i , iiilf. t',•ir-V ,.. 3.-. ..,, ',,4', .-•`,. :.s. . 4---1 ',•. • '..„ '.., .!...•.' ',', . . iIl Ak'G r:. 'iAi _ ��; 4' gyp I. , l: �R°�. ,10A I. ?ru. B�•'S &1: 1: try • ' .'i .14104 '-i-f: ,'.:'.: '''''•'''''''46.1.U.44P"-- ` 3 :•amr44-4 fir”a 3°" =si g► f �fZj>1 VVV Y • • , • • • POWELL AVE. r` ' S ti �> • 9 g e ., • 3 a r.,.'First City Equltlos ` . I. ;2 BLACKRIVER CORPORATE PARK• 1 • 'r, S° � � III� AQ AC 'Ii ,P lli 0 R®n�o4 Wnshlnpton +.Q ....•_..•... •.,11, .1.1=1 1•`I`L;-i t I I.I.• l .S 1 .`I • ..^t'C'�t`3'r�-a4 . - .- . • 5'• . - • • N. . qi p2 .W \\\ / \ •I "wry 7. \ N.. . _ _ • \• \\\ 1 SECTION A-Ai%` vARIAr:i:-:EI \ i1 • lfl W - - - - `-.4LE t _t0-O"_- - ii iloTCAflo�`Ah \ ii ` t/, w. oo E-r \ v - I I i E Z \ \ ThTr - \\ \ -' - DISPOSAL -' 1L N - '..\ G CmcOc o '%4 L \ \ S A - ` Y \ \ ..:._) --- I , - I ; •-.-" \ p.i., _ i =` - z� _-- --T--. ---•- -- VICINITY MAP SCALE 1 600' ---- Xl • a'...hi EMERGENCY FIRE LANE 3, L II zo — {_ 111 - - _ .. \. li wi• rj n.w iR; t �. f1i 'aI TIT: r : ' � II:i ,in, ..0 1 I : ��51 . � c QJ ...00 a r Cr I ADMAC - - W r s aln - - —- --- ---- -- `°" � j I el 7 T Q .o l.n l.. . .L to • ' U $I so'u.+osc.n.soma - L__ Q i. ___I � ^ — Z .- pfl.- .. � 4Jl .fY Irk I b. so.toisn.C.e.sprACwr- 1 i --_ -_—1. _. - ._ ♦ —_ .. .J PLAT OF WASHINGTON TECHNICAL CENTER — - //I ee114 01 �_ ` /I�—VOWELL AVE 5 W. r 1 1 1:;� ,mot ,1' •g3 "q.. ,.!' `- • • - 1. ,< SA-0 7-86., V-058-86. • . ADPMAC''',-'(FIRST CITY EQUITIES)!' 1 ; o tea. ' i • i :...,..„,. , ..: , ; ; , , i ' 1 ill d , IIIIIIIIIII wo ' ' N IIIIIIIIIII ^I-_-1 I _1I 'nIIIIIIIG lin , i 11. Wi ::::=:::::2_,_ __,, i ::' „ i t ': 't • ' Ka .41111 ''' -: - ::___I r, IiiI III ■ 1 I lib —r — �. E - iIIJ ,.. : I■ ■l s - - - liiim 1 - !__ ^ _ 1■.■El ■■1■■1 I _ ,_ '.... IIIIIIIIIIII _ ■ s =.■ • II I■.■. ,,. • `I I. 111111 - IIIII • 3 .i., - -5. . , 3 !11.a f.. -{ i i x1.'y ,1 First City4ulUas. r • # / 1 `',` :' BlackRiver 'Corporate Park i ' ° x A®AAACui�di Building , N is t Renton,Waa1tntiton • "- REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVTQ ON : HOC/Cl( (fJ J' tO; Aff.77- . ® APPROVED . 2 He-PROVED WITH CONDITIONS ' SNOT APPROVED . I.) l' 4 - R f . 46' i 1-i i-r t-z-a-A'i-.—e-e--s--,i -dp,.- 4-,,O, fed4o4 41 .f-e e-A(0 ' ) i .. .' —al‘0-• - - 4 . • —-(i e_54-,a.,44 . • 4_ • 1,,x0v, et _ • G.., _Li I. / ' .4"Araeate-e-o-L-e-rao-V ( , Mo ' . 7_ ,•; ,,G dt,Z -----e. a...., s 'dko /tve‹7 0 3)--- -- Ine„et.4,„:0,......c r,4, ___464:„. ,;.,,,./ -_, c , , • • el, d . ,e„..4.2.:p, ." e, 1 A % . .- - DATE: -7f`t gb . HECTOR OF ECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE L REVISION 5/1982 ' Form 182 . REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : . < --.1)C • APPROVED EI APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS 0 NOT APPROVED _ ( / . yi��— DATE: <�/ r`' OR SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHIZED REPRESENTATIVE , ,‘,• REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : /,eE .25 :,°7 flAPPROVED flAPPROVED WITH CONDITIONS I2(NOT APPROVED A.C.L a)e097'*E'e S c/eFi9c E /eE 9 wiz;,e 0 Fe)# /: ee.E .APT. Ac c ESQ' "7. ' zgo///9.e.os No i Age,ie a v 4P43 ir i fS E. . -3• ,92fri i 4 Na 7- il.4 A a W � O p µ) F pey7 Ee4 EA/c y, R.e c Ess /20 f4,0. y. Cc°Ess .6-,ele -e i e A/r 41114Vo i 1-.earn ice'a cc) E.0 A "l cl E. s. cu usT- ,6,E JA/ ,e..eia,E i F.edI r7 i 007 . ?.ch i='i.edf- 2Ee Pcc ES S /za s , c/t .6 E .0-4.4 l..J E A Trri E,c ' sv,e ,o c -ea. GeJ/ , P P T/ C.0&de d ere Pie/o,le , 77 F'z.g<-1 ' '^S,. . e:- ."' : ''' e N;,.-..._ , . . ';j -•, . DATE: '• --. r REVIEWING. DEPARTMENT/DI\'TQION:_.• . • . , : - • El APPROVED. 4.. ;E HPPROVE0 :WITH, CONDITIO,NS,; k NOT APPROVED' 6„;J,,=_e: ,. s &4 l ` :.G -e LL_ 7777—, - ' ,,,L �.. �..�-%_� -1el we 7 • DATE: SIGNATURE •-OF 'DIRECTOR 'OR AUTHORIZED`,'REPRESENTATI.VE ` ' ' . ' REVISION 5/1982 • '. 'Form 182 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : Hai ;c Cra i�,0-c_./- -- . 0 APPROVED • QrAPPROVED WITH 'CONDITI.ONS• El NOT APPROVED ' . '',61- 1'; 'ill;1" /ite.e/l6L' i:e-r"‘1.- i A-; <4t,/, .-.7-), -, 64-(4407. . • •,,, , , • :. ., • , .=,,,.H . • . i_ ...,,,,t ? ,e, -4....1,,_.4, 4. ..-.7t06,a.c.,-- , .. ., :::'. . ,wt.,_ ' (.44i,,c-tfie".424-.. .: - .•:, ,' •• . • : - ', . !.. . , ; ., . .. . , . . , "• f ' t /6:_yr.,:t..7/9,.. , . , " I , ' DATE: _ LS. SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE ' ' : - • ` • . a REVISION 5/1982 • , Form 182 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION:• UT/b/T>' J6/N€.E�/ti/6a El APPROVED, 0 APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS Ft NOT APPROVED • Kx.M :,r :: E E .:. .,es • '- 3' 3. 'Ir® 4y /. l�dk� ,, 1 . _ 4 „: • Ma :CIAREE-WATER • )46,„'S , . • , SWE� • itARSESEWE t ,' . .. __ '. 7Z " . ; , *,',•' ';AREA•.C_NAR E-WATER7 E54: cT X 3/S /93 U= /2, ( ,7 CIAI.AS SMENTAREA CNAEGE:.• ER 7• Z • . APPROVEf`p ATER"ELAN.• • ... • .L:,rt • 2S . :,., i QU/2q 0!/, i)-A2,4 y/oin//ny. -. rPF1OVW flOE`NYDRAt�!T LOCATWIS off' C ( n �,-,f-Y1�•,.-. ' :', 't � c 4p' st/oW/i✓G- ,9i4 f•AsEs Ov • -.• `` v '' ' '" : . . • ' OF. h4C�i /t'' .7-ch': �� —=_ - Phi g i pi/, / sQ. F76, /s `� l?/�i�7, A/"V,�Ac,�/ P.4,e�� ON l�l.4P _ / / DATE: • 7 /y/ / 70 l: .' C TP_NIAti'.11 C' A'C T11 Fd Yd C4TA/ii F919' A!d'P L.IAI'�T=fr- n hfT[f I9 L�oC111'T.AYT.tr : • � I „ • REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVE c•'ON. ".S", `.=r zaAPPROVED • .flewPROVED WITH CONDITIONS ' - ''• NOT APPROVED, • . . 1 , r 1 •''I I j J i" • ATE. c. ''' ;:x' .. SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE , ' •' • !'' f REVISION 5/1982 ff' I' 1• Form 182 ... _ I , 1 , i • • ' 1 ,, , 6 • 1 1 ' • , I 1 ,,j .. I , ' ...1 I , sir ' . ' •J 1 r '(i+ ' it'd•��•: , , 1 { { I.j 4C-P,•!•-• 7.11 . . , tvil,c . , ' '; , ''` •--, • '' ' • '''-''I- '••!'.: l'Ill''' IT, ::II•ii'.i'-',(•;" -.4I.i•I'II , g : ',,,,='!''''-...- . '... ..' .. ;''' I ''Ir---'-'' C . 4 ; •m• . • . . • . .,,,,,'‘'Arfttilg;. : • •: .: - —, . , -, . vi•'.1.-4-:,..',.Y..'". !":'-, ' . . .,.. • .. .• A.-,.•.;,;,1 '. , . . . . .- ---,- " ' ' ...... . ...,. ';;4-4''''' - . . ,• . . . . . . , , • • . „ . . . . , . • . . ' . ,.'WF • ;• CITY OF RENTON ' ' " "i-,; . . D 1-r".,• WI 1[4. 11 \ILI F- it,. , , . . . ,".................. • ...._.i.! . . • ..11 .' JUL 1 4 1986 , • : . • ' FIRST CllY/ • . • SCHUMAN . BUli DING/ZONING DEPT. July 1.4 f 1986 . ' ', ‘, -. `g ,.'',.•.' -:-.:- '''. , • . . , . • . . . . • . .. . . . . . , . ; . : , . • , , , . . . . , . . , „ • . • .. gentpi,l ' EnVi;7011M04.t4L''ReVieW COMM4.ttOe . ,, . , . . . . . . ., CITY:: 'OR-RSNTON - • ..--:•• 'I.' • ;' ' , . ',--.," ' .,• ' •' ., 200 :Niil:rAliehge-'8'.- - . ,. . - :,:' -. : 1 ' Renton, • WA -,I.98C155 .•' •• . - . - .•,, .: • ' -- ' , . , •.',. . . ' , ,,, '; :r;',-.,,i---. V'...•,', -:,•• , :, ' ••., , -. ' . - - ,:, .. ., RO: . ?mil.44 Site tPlan Approval and •- •:,',•,,-;'.• ` 1146h eS. . '7'004.e,t'.'oul,'•4: 70,c- Variance' ,. - • ; .. .. . . -,.. .,,•:;; ••. - . . . . . ''• - • Pi.AP:kk;vEft CORPORATE PARK -: ;- ''. . - - .. • ., • . . . , . ... . , ,. . , • Gentlemen: .-.. ,.' • .; - • .!,, .5,,• 'i, ,., :.•,• .., •,., .. • . , . ,• . , ..,. . . . , . .. . . . . . •- Fiest,-;•-'04:ty,r,ii2peVe?•.opmehe . Corp •,- agz.pep to dedicate ehcl'• coriptpAct• the. ,'rO44way, '.for•,:'! Nachos Avenue:'• from 'S.W. 7th Stteet toY the temporary cul-de-sac to -the.' .' nOrth-4,,-' ',asscppiated,:, 'with the: ADMAC•- • 17.0;ildirifj7,::-.;.:rsite located to east of •1140hess'Avehues:;;-•::', (City of '. re'piEorir-,i'..Vgr,id ;.!.,.u4'..ei- %1§,'"', .#A-,051. ...0 6'..01c1...-.tcF. 0$0-86) , • We understand . '' •,. :, .: this letter:- :of '000Ou'tkehce-ie,r;iegiii.;e4 •t...?F-41'ai#:, tO•:•,igegeriae•,-:.-,of-';'the,,,..}. DeOleratiO0;,:, of'-... Non -Significance by' ;the Environmental Review ; ,,. • COttirii).ttee.', 1 •• ..-;"• 1.. ',,,;'',.., -'•;:ri,. :,,, . . . I'•,..•-,,,,,,•:.• ;,' , ; "• ;':-.•,:.•.: : :;! ' .. ' ... ; ,•_•,:'. • ••„: .";- •:.,•' -. ,:' , -': r -';',. •J.,: . . .. . ,. . . ,• . ,• ., , ; -:•:i',-•.: T.AI. Pil.. Regards, . .-.yn•-• '... .: ./. ,:, . .,- ' ,, :, . ,.j,,,.--, . .:,.....-;,..: .., :: .,., ,: ,,,.:. .. . , ,,,, , ' •Y, • ''. FTRsr.CITY/SCi..IUMAN ' :: .: -:-• - • • . . . ....., . :. : . • ,„ ..,, ?.. ' '. t'f,tit&ilii:::: ''' '''' ' ' • : . . : . . . . . . Bethara. E. NOss,- ;;',.•:, , - ' • . . • • , •. . . •. ., pikeOto*.,pf:41ahhin4 - .,': -.' H. •• . : ' '' ''..,. •• • ,,,,, • :- -:..i.;. ---..,- • ,,,,,i. 1; '• .. ,, OEIvr/clip,-.; :•...•;•.•:',„,.. ,, i•-•. .-, -,,,,, .. -;;;•;. :., :.., ,.:.,.• — ., • „ ..,.. . ..• . . ,• •;•4 N'''' , . . j cc Art Hitcktng$'- .:' 8O1.>•,'RoeCE• ••••::'' ...::•,' •' • '' .: •••... , • , , . . . . . - ,- .: -. : -,. ••, • ; • .,a,:!.". ,,,,,....,",'i•-•tv::,, . ,.. . . :,,. . , ..: . •I:•:i•,'''''•Ii•'.f.:ir,ri.';';:i :••.Royce Berg •'• • . • ., . ,-•-- , .. .,-, ,.. .... ..: ?I ,6 •i;,',I.r 1 1.1t:i;,! • i' ' . .Greg Byler• ' . . • . . • • , • . r ,p.,,,,:,,,!,,i,,...: .., il- - •::,•' ,, . , :. .,,-;„,,,,:' ,.. . , . . . . . . .. . . , . .. , .. ..- . . „ , . 1II . . . : ! ., , ;I -:•• :' ' 1:.';',',',. .: ,' ',; ,. . ••. :'•;?: . . •, . •. . ., . • - ...•' - ; • • ; i '. .: • , I. . ::,;•,,;: :;.,. !...,. . . . •• ,.- . ‘; - 1 :, • - -'. •• : -2•-.• .••. ::, :-.1 ., ; •li.1 if . , . . ,i.,,,i., .. . . 1. , .:.....„ „...-, , . . ,. . . . ,, . ' ' ' '• .., ,. .,i,,..,:i..12:,,,, ..... , . . , .; ••, - : •::::',;... .,,.idri :1:,11',,..,-.i"; ' ' . . 800 Fifth Avenue•Suite 4170•Seattl?,Washington981p4•,(206)624-9223 VII:, :, ] „. ' .. .. ,.,.. .,..: ..°i1,4:!4• . . .. ,-....-...,.. ,. . . . . . . . ,. . . . .. . •. . . . , , , . . ;g,• . , ' . . . . , . . ,. . . . . .. -, . .. . . . . ., . - - . . . . . . . . , . . . . • , . . . • .... . . . . . . .• . , . . . . . , . • . . - . •• . . . . . . . . . • „ . . . . • „. . . . . , .. . . • ig . . • . .. ,1 . .. . . . . •. . . . . , . . . . . . , •. . . . g . . • , - . ; , ; . . . . . . .. . . , . g • , . • . • . , . , . , . . . . : , . ' :•• ; .8. , . . !••I'''.,!I'll". 1'ic. • ' .. ' • . ; 1198N • • • CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) • • ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST NO.: ECF-050-86 APPLICATION NO(s).: _SA-057-86 V-058-86 • a • DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Application for site plan approval to allowt the construction of a two story building having 93.170 square feet for office. ' manufacturing and • warehouse uses, and variance application to allow a cul-de-sac road length over 500 feet. PROPONENT: First City Equities • LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Black River Technology Park located on the east • side of Neches Avenue S.W. at the 500 block. • LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton. Building and Zoning Department. ' • The' lead agency for this amended- proposal has determined that it 'does not have a • probable. significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision Was made after review of.a completed environmental checklist and other information including: 1. Letter from First City/Schuman dated July 14. 1986 regarding the dedication and construction of Naches Avenue S.W. from S.W. 7th Street to the temporary cul-de-sac to the north associated with the ADMAC Building on file with the lead agency. This Information is available to the public on request. , There is no comment period for this DNS. • Responsible Official: Environmental Review Committee City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South. Renton, WA 98055 Phone: 235-2550 APPEAL: You may appeal this determination in writing to Renton Hearing Examiner no • later than July 31. 1986. , You should be prepared to make specific factual objections. Contact City of Renton. Building and Zoning Department to read or ask about the procedures for SEPA appeals. DATE OF DECISION: July 9. 1986 PUBLICATION DATE: July 17. 1986 /1 • Ronald G. Nelson Larry M. Springer Building and Zoning Director Policy Development Director • • 'chard C. Houghton Public Works Director �/f g (5(86 C.44) ',. -�..� �r ,,., �.� ,-max.•, �---�_` ) ®® Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle • Exchange Bldg. • 821 Second Ave.,Seattle,Washington 98104 August 4, 1986 Barbara Moss Director of Planning First City Equities 800 Fifth Avenue Suite 4170 Seattle, Washington 98104 RE: Blackriver Corporate Park Transportation Management Plan Dear Barbara: I wanted to take the opportunity to applaud your work on the Transportation Management Plan for the Blackriver Corporate Park development. Thank you, too, for the opportunity to review and comment. That you have done such a comprehensive job as a voluntary measure is commendable. The development of a structure and designation of personnel to assure that the Plan is carried out are two pieces that we have found essential to a successful effort. Your provisions for a person from First City Equities to serve as the Employee Trans- portation Coordinator, for a Transportation Coordinator at each business, and for a possible Management Committee in the future address these aspects very well. The long term key to the success of this effort, of course, will be dependent on its being implemented over time and possibly through subsequent owners. We look forward to working with you and the City of Renton to assure the success of your Transporta- tion Management Plan. Sincerely, vx.„7„0,„ Carol S. Thompson Market Development Planner CST: jn cc: Kathe Allen, First City Equities Bill Roach, Supervisor, Market Development Gary Norris, Traffic Engineer, City of Renton tee GUIDELINES FOR THE TRANSPORTATION MANAGEMENT PLAN V OF • • • BLACKRIVER CORPORATE PARK -- RENTON • • • The property shown on the photograph, which is. hereto attached and incorporated by reference, is commonly known as BLACKRIVER CORPORATE- PARK (BCP) . This Transportation Management Plan (TMP ) is designed to address BCP' s transportation needs, and their impact on the City of Renton. . BCP is collectively owned by First City Equities ( FCE) , a Washington State General Partnership, and First City Developments Corporation ( FCDC ) , a Washington State Corporation. The intent of the TMP is to encourage the reduction of single-occupant vehicle trips to and from the site during peak hours and, as a result , reduce daily vehicle trips impacting the roadway system in the vicinity of the park. It has been -determined that the following Guidelines for implementation are consistent with the foregoing objectives. FCE shall periodically consult with King County Metro Commuter Pool Staff to provide services and assistance in implementing elements of the TMP. ADMINISTRATION • FCE shall administer the TMP. The TMP shall be coordinated and directed by an individual designated by FCE. Initially, • said individual will be Kathye Allen, Property Manager for t ' • BCP, Kathye Allen will hereinafter be .referred to as. Employee 'Transportation Coordinator - (ETC ) . ' • The ETC of the TMP may exercise all those duties and functions which are specified or implied by this TMP. The powers shall include establishing and/or revising reasonable guidelines of the TMP, with the cooperation of the City of Renton and Metro. The ETC will request each lessee to designate an individual as the lessee 's Transportation Coordinator (TC ) , who will be asked to provide information as requested by the ETC. Duties of the TC are outlined below. • If, at some time in the future, FCE determines the need and chooses to select a Management Committee, it shall have the power to do so. When the Management Committee is selected, the tenants shall be offered the opportunity to serve on it , at least in an advisory and representational capacity. At that time, the selection process , size and scope of the Management Committee shall be determined by FCE. The Management Committee shall be coordinated and directed by the individual chosen by FCE as the ETC. DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES EMPLOYEE TRANSPORTATION COORDINATOR (ETC) 1. Shall incorporate the following information in the Tenants Manual: A. Information covering alternative transportation methods ( i.e. , location of Metro bus stops and routes , ride share •information, etc. ) . . B.: Ride-matching applications for the • carpool program, • to be provided by Metro: - C. A memo, incorporating .information .proVided •by. Metro which encourages employers to consider: 1. transit pass subsidies as an employee bonus; and 2 . fleetride, in which an employer allows company cars to be used by employees for commuter carpools during the morning and afternoon. D. Memo itemizing the benefits of flex-time. E. Memo which encourages employers to participate in dedicated and/or subsidized vanpool or paratransit programs, to the extent such programs exist . 2 . Work with Metro to establish• new bus routes or modify existing bus routes to pass by or through BCP. 3. Provide Metro notification of employer occupancy dates and resulting estimated employee numbers on an ongoing basis . 4 . Cooperate with Metro in Metro' s efforts to provide , install, and maintain at least one ( 1 ) "Commuter Information Center" (CIC) in an accessible and highly visible common area. The CIC will provide information on transportation alternatives. The location of the CIC shall be chosen solely by the ETC. 5 . Survey employers and employees on an annual basis to determine ( 1 ) the effectiveness of the TMP, and ( 2 ) provide Metro with the number of employees using H.O.V. (High Occupancy Vehicle ) modes. The ETC shall reveal the results of said survey to Metro. • . METRO 1. Provide information materials to the ETC as well as stock the CIC. 2. Provide technical assistance and training in developing information systems, parking management programs , flex- time benefit information and promotional programs . 3 . When requested, advise the ETC of surveying, monitoring and evaluating program' s effectiveness . 4 . Make public vanpools (paratransit ) available on a first- come, first-served basis when they are available and when demand is present . 5. Provide ride-matching information and services for cars/ vanpools. 6 . Investigate the potential coordination of employees of nearby sites for participation in a collective TMP, if desired or necessary. TRANSPORTATION COORDINATOR (TC ) 1. Maintain and provide ETC with a list of companies ' times of operation and employee count . This will assist the ETC and Metro in their efforts to monitor BCP ' s public transit needs. 2 . Distribute an opinion survey, provided by Metro, to determine the demand for vanpool and other transit modes annually. 3 . Periodically distribute information which encourages employers to consider transit pass subsidies as an employee bonus as well as the benefits of flex-time work schedules . 4 . Provide Metro ' s ride-match applicatons to employees on • a periodic basis . • • MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE The 'duties , . powers and responsibilities of the Management Committee shall be determined and outlined at the time that FCE determines a committee .is viable. It is agreed that FCE shall have the sole power to modify and implement this TMP. However, FCE agrees that , if and when it modifies this TMP, FCE will: 1. keep the spirit of this TMP in mind, and 2 . consult with Metro for its input on the modifications. To the extent that FCE and/or FCDC sell all or part of the BCP to other parties , the new owners shall not be bound to comply with the terms of this TMP.. However, FCE agrees that it will explain the benefits of this TMP and encourage any new owners to cooperate with Metro in incorporating a similar • document for their purchased property. a • • • • • 0 C?? 0 . . .. ° A o pa•°---•-1 4006° 1 tf 'ill,1 ; L r - ‘ ,) \ .. , .. • CS i• I . . , 0.....,s,y .\, . ... ... ,......_;......„..... . \: - (--- ----, ‘------------ ,•\ t. • l'"•I 111 .M t. .•'. 1 ....'''. ' "Iti•• '° . •jA i.l. 1 Cr li•:‘ • iPil at7;O. %.' 1 " • --" 1.' ' ." 1 \ , -1____ 0"P•mi• - 4 ...,. "',I ,g• ' • . k c‘ .•"1.4114st;..'•;,:;... —II i . ...,,..0%,.1,.....-e \ , . • \ 1 \ 1 06.9- ,.1 ' ,1 1 . • 11,',146 '••. i • •. 1 ' j "!; • to .\ • • I'1 'di•':!. ...... V-,aff 1 to. .„,„ tc I \ 1 1 1 c64:51.1.° ,?:iiit, ft:;_,;•4 .$°",!:. i ,,,;, ; r•-•_•—•----• „,.,.„,r.o00-.„, __,._....rv).-40.„.y q•v‘ . i_ 56-.-- •••••-•,- -- ...1, . wiiiiwor4or Upeo.V. ., 113, - '41,..L\ \die ecorNboori..N.4; 14 3-Si Ofqh 8 :„ _ .1 ,et.3:_t 4 J. ... 11 \ • 1. 1 Ant : 9,4* tqa., 1017".•.:‘,...'4, 1 . in it,G.e CiVa. ... • t 0 ' ... '' • J.): ,.., , e if, fa....,..•Si% , t Os ,r.i.f....i.,,, ..,ft.,R 0. ,. ''' • 4,...:: ••;!.•- L r---/1 1: ,,,DVCCV if,.0 ,k• vs oczt.e„ 6 ,-. ....-. - .:.V/ )4+4'.* IS. ..aysT" '.:utt!).••••• 1 . .„ . i „ . 0 d't• ,5,8,2 •• \ . • ,,,, , . . %• ,L- ...0,1. ••: :•• •:, ...;0••%: -.' c.,9 - u' ' ., , .••,k,\ i 2 .11 i 1 .. 0 ,o,,.. ., t4,,I,...-, •• •• , .. ,i,„:a......,,„•„3-v-,:.,. ....,...„... ,, •, ,_.... __ . .. r• II il.' •••• .•%44.‘".es^ • .•..., 1 •',1,...\eV •.-'...:::”'.',..P4'- ..),•.' . .090`....?- .......„-.....C.V."..:11.1/4 0' ...:AL ,....-,t• . _. . ,s :. "el.- '_.!,.., L.. ,0 • , .40410,40.41.07,r,„_.,,,_-_,..—,,,„, „„421 it..t.t..1 •!.1 GI; ..• ...... '.)...., P.:•••;"- , . .. " r'"" no". w• • ...uoroo.t,.,„, Ir ompleani all-- -•rdr,•A.1 . j..• .• 1 i •-.....0,:•,...---- • •...,,,...7-011-.;i--,..,04 ,...et,--= ..tv.-.....2. 4 0;-, wit ik .11: j. 8 . V.t 2 ju g,, ,ty. ...„--,-.7---,-., • i . .• Alisr• .,-...----,t• r,0 ,fe. ,,...-0""-:- , , . .:11t`b6, 6fif• ".-e-%iN, -44 b., ,,n,1...vic;,,s.a'4.' -- '....."`-_,--------- ....)`:'•s'..'0 r ..,. .. ... ..,,J,,,,,. . _..,........,., .. .„..... .. .... A)• ., •„. . ..ii.1,,,, :3 3orp-,1401,0 — a ill-Ay.• ...-!_-..-- •- 14/t, *r• pa 10-----.• •if ojtc, /..tf•" ,o.:0". .i.,tku 4.1 ....• - rriro, `;41,6 Vir,* `•(."ri....''itiw' a . 4,,, N 44 ,iltilly : ..t. • • •i• the - '...:---- .' prea..1:rz _---,-if--. 044 •e't•i‘'' r, .1.*4* io 1 Pregz.G.7.4w. 44$'. .4.-v ‘1" :',..0 4 ..: 4 fei 4' 41 : . . WI?'it"-:o ' (-- .4. 0.,t4'4,.; • ---t )• ....1rOD .t ? IP )10.2.nr,.... .„.i• 4 if...e czt,.,0,.,, d-,),..0,09.•,*-/• ,,, ij':u•d$ ..0,,t ?.? iwt, • ik„;...... ..e.,2.4.#,/.. --.'.. ...-etvei., .. - ,,....... „7.__4.0,46.,..0. \v,./ 100, 1v. f!•,n, • eir' ' u). tv. .,, 4, v,,,o ...,w ..so., =is %"?:,--,,ovo- i.,_----- -:-. ..,....04em__ 0,- "' - , , \ ,!. •,/,, 14, V. '4.41,aPiFf-0 vi.6),:. 4° ' it '.i.,,,,44 it) . 41 A.. „‘.,.. .."1.? "'''.:,,i,P4f"f!:'e ..-":.--;<-:.-6-1);.°!•••:...ca ".' "; .: .=• (), . \ \ . : . \ : ' t• 4,_ils ,_3•KaA x 1;•;•- --:(1', ...' ... ofi ik. •,.-'"I'v'' .0,./ .z -.. . pi ,filii.:1.,:--. ,..—,,,,,c?-:: ..... .0.----.,airockft • cc 11".....,.,,,,,,, ,, „xi_ _. ..,,,,a..,.., .t....sir,....,•... ••.;,)------.,...,,,-.....,_....,' . ., t,... t . e#1 ...4.4- -••• f: y‘• .`'.6.440Y- vt''..% •-u ..", .oft ,4,4 , •or,%-#440 I: nii. —7.. els t:fk .. ".41• .., ei.ov.A. ...' ,,, ,46 4,. ,/,f lir. , .... • ".. ' I is 4 .1,;/'f‘ti, , 4,. it, • ., ,e,•, ,I el • 1 ° .. ' ,:p Iltiv • i ..-/— .;• - do,J,, ,• . j• .% it • ti 7.• • i i , = i - i . : / .\ ';Awlifis'a.,49't.! . / i. iP' (6.:,•• ' ( Iv ••• .A .1 it ys;•.\ • °"C . '.' ..... V ' 46. it6.11; ' 'k / 'V. 6) • \ 1•1*004.:A? " !liS.'u ,, 4%%1 It i lik 140 • , . • , , • 1 • \ • , • . , .. • . .1. 11 - 1"- „ 4.11%,-4..44... •••• 0 4'• 4,, , i • II I t•Alwftwootor.,,,,-. , 4). - • ib e orp4 :+.0,, \441-v.•'.... '',.S . :.t• ..!''''',. .. '' C'6, .,€,, e',.„.."1,f. z. ) r'' r \ • . , .,. • • 4 \ ...7 ' - '\ .. .-:- \• . \,,, - . k . • ., •. k ,1‘., . ' ilioe•''''. '. \ . \ \\,•Y ,5ifs" " . ---- ---,..-itr-itil ii..,..44 f•\ ' ,•• 9 :'!.:.--"2",:t4,1?,Js.;,-o:,..°.p. .4`-lre. • ' i. - et.:••...4w. .4,,,o,,Nte,' '., .'4° 127%•• .‘ I "".•.1 ?•1'kk L''\' .., 4'44:(it4 l' e7. I • •A1111:4"et ••(•41%7.419.. .. 1 . s,r;.."':,. ..., .01) p, .0 ,.. ;-‘, .L. . ..f,T. - 1111. .• ,t. 0 II Cb,, • ''s ii,„ 'f"I"P....(• 'it/d ) , , .„.•,. ..e .... ie. , 00,,,. ,./. . .... - \I\.60 It... 'co':Ii).k7'%,(%. ••i; ,th' . • 41 di,e. .„ I .:_ex .i. . •._. .. . :tf.bw,,\ .45h.... .?,,, ,v..e.v.4711 • I ..;;Ii) .••;• II in ,.' CC A fail., g D .. .. •.%-.1.tee.s.. 4.04\ 01,9°,%. ? • s.,..44.iibil,iiiiy : . licl 1_ , vt ....# t-'43 Li/0 • .-.i... .'• ' .•• ..--.. -. 4,,, • 0 '.7 I . 11"6t,.'k. ift4; 9.141 IMAM* 'VI NM I C24 ZL1 E . I ' d 0 •. 'n ;.,_.o....i i v, 0 ',t• A . ._ ---- Ca cu (1)-- i' Y 4)‘ 0.4:‘ ,...,p a v. ... . e 1 . r. .. ,iii. • ..• , 10.. ,,...,, ,,,‘ ,,....(16.(1..4,,, ...• . • ) , .0. ,, ,,, .. M Cti g gf g ' ...,„...gi . u• i .-- • I i 1 3 '6', 4% '‘‘. "'0? 1 : . I i di, I. 1, o• Cup z 04 F.). g b ifl 21 o 'RL '.i3jk ( • ... , .. ...‘ ... 1 .;.,,,...... : CC 1., z 6.1 I 6 If 41 ,, 4 . \..‘.,...,.,..., . • ( . 0 CZ:, :/1 ._N © f \ NimOrj CC t i ,ri ull ;II A ail s' \ ,Nc•ST 1 'N . 01.., 1=0 . p .. gu vilf 0 lif El „Nt \D:. 0 0 • . . .. ....,.%) , i>A • 'iiss• i LI. x,,, .. .. ,. .td. . q . 0 . . cJ • e • . ,. j.., • .; • r• - • . • • S'r � 4 '. • ' q..tq.. .. v1 EFr F f ,ra y 3li " 1 F'" + f1�";li} .ra1iQ)PCRf o4sd </,t ri. 6_« ` r r,k, 1'1 ? ArC @ f� 7171 ' . 1 � .o M , Lesson Pomeroy Northwest Ir ac`Royce:A Barg'A I A 114 Vine,Street(2nd&Vine)Seattle,WA 98121(206)728=5771, August 1, 1986 COURIER Mr. Roger Blaylock Planning Department City of Renton Renton, Washington 98055 Re: BlackRiver Corporate Park (Valley 405 Business Park) File No: SA 057-86 V 058-86 Dear Roger: The following is the parking tabulation used for developing this phase of ADMAC. Function S.F. Ratio Stalls Office 28,782 S.F. 1 200 144 Manufacturing 39,057 S.F. 1/1000 39 Warehouse/Storage 24,846 S.F. 1/1500 17 Deck/Entry Plaza 485 S.F. 0 0 Total 93,170 S.F. 200 Stalls Please note we are holding a number of these parking stalls in landscape areas preserved for future parking if ever required. ADMAC has projected a maximum number of parking stalls required at 158 stalls which is what is provided on this initial phase, with 44 additional stalls reserved in landscaping. Future expansion to the north will add additional facilities and parking to suit any changing needs. Res ectfully, Roy a Berg Pre ident cV 7 0N1 -TON RAB:cpm s t5 a cc: Bill Griffiths, V.P., ADMAC AUG 1 1986 Barbara Moss, FCE Greg Byler, FCE BUILDING/ZONING DEPT. Elliott Severson, FCE NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON HEARING EXAMINER RENTON, WASHINGTON A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER AT AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION MEETINGHIS REGULAR IN H COUN- CIL CHAMBERS ONTHESECOND FLOOR OF CITY HALL, RENTON, WASHINGTON ON AUGUST 5, 1986,AT Audrey De Jo i e , being first duly sworn on oath states that 9:00 A.M.TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOW- ING PETITIONS: he/she is the Chief Clerk of the PLAID PANTRY Application for conditional use permit to allow gas pumps in a B-1, Business VALLEY NEWSPAPERS Use, zone as part of a Plaid Pantry store, file CU-015-86;property located sDaily News Journal, Daily Record Chronicle, Daily Globe News At the venueN..E.E. dst andcorner N.E. Sunset o Union At Blvd. Daily newspapers published six (6) times a week.That said newspapers FIRST CITY EQUITIES legal newspapers and are now and have been for more than six Application for site plan approval to are allow the construction of a two story months prior to the date of publication referred to,printed and published building having 93,170 square feet for in the English language continually as daily newspapers in Kent, King officei manufacturingand warehouse use, e,f file 5A-057-8 57-86;and variance appli- County, Washington. Valley Newspapers have been approved as legal cation to allow a cul-de-sac road length newspapers by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for over 500 feet, file V-058-86. Property located on the east side of Neches King County. Avenue S.W. at the 500 block. Legal descriptions of the files noted The notice in the exact form attached, was published in the Daily News above are on file in the Renton Building and Journal , Daily Record Chronicle X , Daily Globe News , (and Zoning Department. All interestededpersons to said petitions not in supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its are invited to be present at the public subscribers during the below stated period. The annexed notice a hearing on August 5, 1986,at 9:00 a.m.to express their opinions. Notice of Public Hearing was published Ronald G. Nelson Building and Zoning Director on July 25, 1986 R171.10 Published in the Daily Record Chronicle July 25, 1986. R1740 The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of $26•73 . Subscribed and sworn to before me this 29th day of July is, 86 Notaryc blic for the State of Washington, residing at Federal Way, King County, Washington. CITY o,= rcFN T O:•1 flVN#87 Revised 10/84 it. El Aur 71986 BuILD;rsIG/zow;ry. aEp-r 2536Z NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING- _ RENTON HEARING EXAMINER RENTON, WASHINGTON A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS ON THE SECOND FLOOR OF CITY HALL. RENTON. WASHINGTON ON AUGUST 5, 1986, AT 9:00 A.M. TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS: PLAID PANTRY Application for conditional use permit to allow gas pumps in a B-1. Business Use. zone as part of a Plaid Pantry store. file CU-015-86: property located at the southwest corner of Union Avenue N.E. and N.E. Sunset Blvd. FIRST CITY EQUITIES Application for site plan approval to allow the construction of a two story building having 93.170 square feet for office. manufacturing and warehouse uses. file SA-057-86: and variance application to allow a cul-de-sac road length over 500 feet. file V-058-86. Property located on the east side of Neches Avenue S.W. at the 500 block. Legal descriptions of the files noted above are on file in the Renton Building and Zoning Department. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT THE PUBLIC HEARING ON AUGUST 5. 1986, AT 9:00 A.M. TO EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS. PUBLISHED : July 25. 1986 Ronald G. Nelson Building and Zoning Director CERTIFICATION I. JEANETTE SAMEK-MC KAGUE, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THREE COPIES OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENTS WERE POSTED BY ME IN THREE CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED ABOVE AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW. ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me. a Notary Public. in and for tile. State of Washington residing in CR€k)Tt n' on. the AT-601. day of July, 1986. Q om, SIGNED• 2L a-td SZ�a%ham ' 3017Z • BUILDING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING AUGUST 5., 1986 ; APPLICANT: FIRST CITY EQUITIES FILE NUMBER: SA-057-86 V-058-86 A. SUMMARY & PURPOSE OF REQUEST: The applicant seeks site plan approval to allow the construction of a two-story building having 93,170 square feet for office, manufacturing and warehouse uses and variance application to allow :a .cul-de-sae road length over 500 feet. B. GENERAL INFORMATION: 1. Owner of Record: First City Equities 2. Applicant: First City Equities 3. Location: (Vicinity Map Attached) . Located on the east side of Naches Avenue S.W. at the 500 block. 4. Existing Zoning: M-P, Manufacturing Park 5. Existing Zoning in the Area: R-2, Residential-Two Family; and M-P, Manufacturing Park 6. Comprehensive Land Use Plan: Manufacturing Park/Multiple Option. - Office 7. Size. of Property: ± 4.3 acres 8. Access: S.W. 7th Street_.'to„proposed Naches Avenue 9. Land Use: Undeveloped 10. Neighborhood Characteristics: North: Undeveloped Property East: Undeveloped Property South: Manufacturing/Office'Uses , West: Undeveloped, Prciperty, C. HISTORY/BACKGROUND: . Action File Ordinance Date Annexation 1745 Apr. 14, 1959 * Corrected --- 1756 May 19, 1959 * Corrected --- 1928 ' Dec., 12, 1961 Rezone (G to ) R-432-79 --- „ --- Rezone (G to M-P) . R-129-80 3694 Dec. 24, 1982 Lot Line Adjustment LLA-013-84 . --- Sept. 23, 1983 Preliminary Plat PP-089-84 --- Dec. 4, 1984 Special Permit SP-090-84 . :--- Dec. 4, 1984 Variance V-091-84 ---- Dec. 4, 1984 Special Permit . SP7024-86 - --- .. May 20, 1986 D. PUBLIC SERVICES: 1. Utilities: ' a. Water: A_12-inch water line is located along S.W. 7th Street and along the.proposed ,Naches Avenue S.W. PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER `' FIRST CITY EQUITIES, FILE SA-057-86/V-058-86' AUGUST 5, 1986 PAGE 2 b. Sewer: _, A 12-inch sanitary sewer line is located along S.W. 7th Street and along the proposed Neches Avenue S.W. c. Storm Water Drainage: Storm water flows into the Black River drainage system. " 2. Fire Protection: Provided by the' City of-Renton as per.;ordinance requirements. 3. Transit: Metro' transit. routes No. 199 and No.,.340 operate along S.W. 7th Street to lAnd Avenue S.W. 'approximately '0.4 of a mile `southeast of the subject ;property. 4. Schools: • a. :.Elementary Schools: N/A b ` 'Middle Schoole: N/A c: High:.Schools: N/A 5. Recreation:. N/A: , E. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE ZONING CODE: 1. Section 4-730, Manufacturing (M-P). 2. Section 4-722(G), Variance. } 3. Section.4-734(F)(2), Landscaping Requirement Green River. 4. Section 4-738, Site;Plan Review. F. APPLICABLE `SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR OTHER OFFICIAL CITY, DOCUMENT: 1., industrial Goal and Objectives, City of Renton, Comprehensive Plan Compendium, 'March 1986, :p. 18-19. 2: Green River Valley Policy Plan, City of Renton„ Comprehensive Plan j Compendium, March 1986, p: 31-50. G. DEPARTMENTAL ANALYSIS: 1. The applicant, First City Equities, is requesting site plan approval to allow the construction of a building containing 93,170 square feet on a 43 acre parcel. The applicant is also requesting ' a variance to'allow the construction, of a :cul-de-sac' street (Neches Avenue S.W.) that exceeds-`500. feet in, length. ' 2. The building site is being designed to allow the future expansion of the business, ADMAC. The two story structure will be constructed of painted concrete panels along With reflective and tinted glass. . The intent of large expanses of glass is to reflect the natural vegetation preserved that the applicant proposes creating along the southern boundary of the property. 3. A fifty (50) foot wide landscaping strip has been, set aside to continue and enhance the ."natural preserve" that was required to the west of the subject site .as {part of the Black River Office Park development proposal. The drainage system,will be'.developeeinto an amenity: ;a. 4. The Environmental Review Committee issued a Mitigated Declaration of Non-Significance based upon the fact that the applicant woyld dedicate and construct Neches Avenue ,S.W. from'.S.W. 7th`Street to the temporary cul-de-sac':to"the.north associated with the ADMAC. Building. r" The appeal period will expire at 5 p.m. on July 31, 1986. 5. Various City Departments reviewed the proposal: ..The Police Department and Building' Division of the Building and Zoning Department recommended approval without conditions. The other department comments'}are as follows: • qj ' Ii PRELIMINARY REPORT TO 1n HEARING EXAMINER ; ., I , ' , ' ;! FIRST CITY EQUITIES, FILE SA-057-86/V-058-8.6 , ' " . ,• • - ' , , - . , i ' AUGUST 5, 1986 . 1 PAGE 3 , POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT:• , APPROVED WITH ,CONDITIONS - July 9, 19,86 ,. 1. This proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan land . use designation of Manufacturing Park/Multiple. Option (Office) and the existing M-P,:zoning for the subject site. It is also compatible.with the,;existing land• uses .in the.vicinity. , 2. It should be a condition of approval.,with the Hearing Examiner • that all significant trees (particularly the Douglas Firs , located" in•the southeast corner of the.site) be ,retained as much as possible and per the concurrence of the City's .Landscape Architect. . ; 3. The request for variance on the cul-de-sac appears reasonable and not•detrimental, to existing uses; provided, however, that it is for specific limited time, and is definitely to be ' '. , . . replaced, with a permanent full connection to•Oaksdale Avenue. ' ' ' TRAFFIC ENGINEERING DIVISION: , • APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS ' June 30, .1986 . , . . ' Participation -in latecomers for traffic signals.•at S.W. 7th and ' ,Hardie and Powell and Grady.. Applicant shall determine traffic volumes (AWDT) from this development assigned to each of these intersections. DESIGN ENGINEERING -DIVISION: - APPROVED WITH,_CONDITIONS Powell Avenue S.W. does not ,appear-that it will be.extended any ' further to the north. Therefore, the cul-de-sac .which was ' " temporary should be.-completed to ,include curb and gutter drainage and sidewalks together.with any other necessary appurtances. UTILITY ENGINEERING':'' NOT APPROVED - July 11, 1986 . . .Sewer, Latecomers Fee - HDK •, . , . • $81,471.82 ' .. . • Water and Sewer System Development. ' - ' Charge of $0.04 per square foot • $25,215.44' . . . • $12,607.72. for each- . ' ,. , , . Require over-all vicinity map showing all phases of Black.River : . ; _ Technical Park with square•,footages written in each parcel. FIRE DEPARTMENT: . -. , NOT•APPROVED . ' 1.: All weather surface required for Fire Department access. 2. Bollards not approved for use. , ' 3. . . Parking not, allowed on.emergency access road.; , ' ,;-;4: - Access .easement from Powell Avenue S.W. must•be in prior to . , , framing. All Fire Department access roads must be all weather ' ' , surfaced with asphalt/concrete prior. to 'framing. VARIANCE/V-058-86 (Allow a cul-de-sac street over 500 feet in length) . The following analysis shows that the variance request is - ' appropriate with the four (4) criteria under Section 4-722(G) . 6. Th'at the applicant suffers undue hardship and- the variance is ' necessary because of special circumstances applicable to subject, including size, shape, topography, location or surrounding of the subject property, and the strict application of the Zoning Code is . found to deprive subject property owner of rights .and privileges enjoyed by other property owners in the vicinity and under' . , identical zone classification. _ PRELIMINARY REPORT TO,THE HEARING EXAMINER FIRST CITY EQUITIES, FILE SA-057-86/V-058'=86 ' ', a AUGUST 5, 1986 PAGE 4 ' The hardship 'is created by the (1) size, (2) shape, and (3) location of the property. The ADMAC site is the southeastern most lot in the development of Black diver Office Park. The total'industrial%office park is'a;very'unusual,- long irregularly shaped'parcel because of-the-preservation of a portion of the natural riparian forest"`associated with the old Black River: channel:. Access is further 'limited'by the fact ' that the entire northern'boundary of' the office park is bordered by railroad tracks. - 7. That the granting of the variance will not be materially. detrimental to 'the,'publis welfare or:injurious to the property or improvements in the vicinity and zone: in`.which`thesubject property is 'situated. The Fire Department has implied that ;unless the roadway access is installed`prior;to the construction `of framing of the building that there 'will be'a'materially 'detrimental impact upon :.the subject property. It appears that if the emergency access question satisfactorily answered then the proposed.. variance will not create a access ;.problem. A'problem will' exist if the development' of 'the 'remainder of the Black River Office Park is no developed along with the intended extension of Naches'Avenue :S.w. . to Oaksdale Avenue Therefore, it is suggested that at a minimum the. applicant grant to the City of Renton prior:' to'issuance of a building permit a permanent reservation for the location of a industrial collector`street.{ 8. That ,approval, shall not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitation upqn uses of other' properties in the vicinity and, zone in`Whichthe ubj act property is situated. - The subject site is so unique that we do not have a comparison with other properties :in the vicinity. It may grant a 'special privilege, but it. is the only:way;to utilize the subject site without>developingtheentire street - 9. That the approval as determined by the Examiner or,Board'of Adjustment is a minimum variance that will;,accomplish the desired purpose. s ` Based upon the, design and''the fact that the ADMAC project is the next logical extension of Nachos Avenue S.W.; the variance ' requested is the minimum necessary to allow emergency access to the subject site: SITE PLAN/SA-057-86 • 10. The applicant has not provide calculations supporting the on site ! parking shown';in the,plans. The,applicant will have to provided them during the pub];ic'hearingprocess to':•assure the City that the ' site is actually being Used as a manufacturing/office facility ' instead of purely''office'. - The site plan as present complies with the specifics of the, ' Zoning Code.' The 91,922 square .foot.'building ' is divided in function,'and requires parking based upon the following analysis: PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER FIRST CITY EQUITIES, FILE SA-057-86/V-058-86 ` AUGUST 5, 1986 PAGE 5 11. Section 4-738 (D) provides the basic-site 'plan review criteria. It appears that all are complied with: a. Conformance with the Comprehensive Plan, its elements and policies; • b. ' Conformance with existing land use regulations; c. Mitigation of impacts to surrounding properties and uses; d. Mitigation of impacts of the proposed site plan to the site; e. Conservation of area-wide property values; f. Safety and efficiency of vehicle and pedestrian circulation; g. Provision of adequate light and air; h. Mitigation of noise, odors and other harmful or unhealthy conditions; i Availability of public services and facilities to accommodate the proposed use; and j. Prevention of neighborhood deterioration and blight. ISSUES: 11. The primary design issue deals with off-site construction of access. The City must be assured that Neches Avenue S.W. is - constructed to connect S.W. 7th Street and Oaksdale Avenue S.W. Even though the proposal is acceptable for both primary and emergency access at this time, the issue of when should Neches Avenue S.W. be completely installed is critical and must be addressed at this time. The applicant appears .to be developing the property in small parcels without going through a formal subdivision. This is legal as long as they retain ownership of the land. A condominium plat or a binding site plan approval could be completed on the property. The applicant should commit at this time to designating and permanently reserving the necessary right-of-way for the Neches Avenue extension. The applicant should be required to. construct Neches to minimum emergency access standards at the time of development of the next parcel to the north. The parcel immediately west of Neches from the subject site possiblycould be accessed without the complete extension of Neches. Tile applicant would have to present supporting information at the time of development. 12. The Public Works Department has commented that the applicant should participate in latecomers fees at the intersections of S.W. Grady Way and Powell Avenue S.W. and S.W. 7th Street and Hardie Avenue S.W. These latecomers agreements are official documents of the City and bind the applicant. . ' 13. The traffic engineering report prepared by The Transpo Group recommended mitigation for the entire Black River Technology Park (pages 24 to 27) . The Environmental Review Committee did not require implementation of any of those improvements at this time; however, the issue is whether this project should eventually pay its proportional share. The study suggests it should, but there needs to be legal conditions imposed requiring participation. Therefore, we would recommend the filing of restrictive covenants requiring participation to their proportionate share of the identified mitigating measures. The Transportation Management Plan should be implemented at this time. PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER ♦ ,• FIRST CITY EQUITIES, FILE SA-057-86/V-058-86 AUGUST 5, 1986 PAGE 6 H. DEPARTMENTAL RECOMMENDATION: + Based upon the above analysis it is recommended that the Hearing Exam3,ner approve the site ,plan request, file'';SA-057-86, and variance `request, file V-058-86, ,subject to the following conditions: 1. Execution of t'estricti.ve covenants requiring participation in future taffic improvements. ' " • 2. Construction of Neches Avenue 'S.W. and the emergency access roa4 from Powell Avenue S.W.';prior to framing of the 'building. 3. The preparation and- filing of a legal 4ocument.that`+permanently reserves the necessary right-of-way foi the construction of Neches Avenue S.W. from S.W, 7th Street.toQaksdale,Avenue S.W:- for. an ' f industrial+ collectoF arterial: • • • • I ' 4 ITi1 �1• 8 • _ ` .• 17 °�•I•. •f L • r • s I i Nr �\ F '•� 'il _ • _TTTTI!J!iirjIci: .1. . . . • ,. , . i ..i,.V., .mod . , ,; - -c., r-' alPi tz . ".1 1.. k' ._', t rfl ci 1 3 • • Irj.QfO `�• w. t 1. E • ci,V' 1�a \ l 2 • - -e �-1, z .0 ,ti,s „. ...---r•-• . ......- css 4----,,,._. , ,........, , ,', , A,_.-7. . • ,tr. . i• '. ,• '• I.. II .....‘1 I Til 1 • 1 t .•, 1 . . /G/ywA• ` -�.�_L. - �� . •ire�r P �, , Hqh. •', t(t� L • ge x-,-47.77) 1 .,.:.--,..--'---.. j ''. . --las. _ tai I ' .'.1 1.40 l iii fi•..,.. ' —--- _ 1 I �9'Q I 5. a -A. ,C `,� •._ „- ,,, 1 1 Mr /q .. —_-ram �� �I • 1 ti Nor4,011 1 r 1.4 I ."'iV.l I., n , Lilille/1'11 3 -7i . , ifiatitifi. 666, •,. i 1 i.... ::... I • .... '. litib.\P'• froWillg 41 ti;•: ' ..,' /. ...' • ,:.a RI I ..,... ....,, .'' I ..,:, '- ' , r:oe''''' '. :*- , Ai, , ' • .14,4", ; ,,, ,,.,, . ...._ _ ; ,L .,.._ cti 1r „.: I - ,.,) ' I ,' a . > I M-P , .i _. M E, T ,R \ `�\1' ,.,, y z \, e i D . I- S. P 0 S A -L: ' `° ,11 I v'" 'c ' "-0 '/'=,r :..� • 0\ 1 "�;mac .illAr I III / ' � � \ I 1 __ • - - .„nin infi it �� •_dl ' _ FIRST CITY EQUITIES - ' • , SA-057-86 '., V -058-86 • 0 • APPLICANT FIRST CITY EQUITIES ', . TOTAL AREA ,_± 4.3,ACRES - • PR I NC I PAL ACCESS S.W. 7TH ST TO PROPOSED NACHES AVENUE - , EXSTING ZONING - M-P, MANUFACTURING PARK H • . , • EXISTING :USE •• ,UNDEVELOPED PROPERTY • PROPOSED USE '•TWO STORY ,BUILDING:.FOR OFFICE, WAREHOUSING & MANUFACTURING USES • COMPREHENS-IVE'• LAND USE PLAN MANUFACTURING PARK/MULTIPLE OPTION. - OFFICE ' - ' :' COMMENTS .. : 1 , I 1 °000°0000' ;1. O'O r. O 'O 0 • • .• O •d O • •' Seco j II ■;I • 3 mom '!�1 'ogogog.30., 4.,. 1 O O' O '• • a • Q1• I ,•. �i�® ': �ogogog0oo , • O' + • O''O ::::::::I • • ♦ • f+',. • III1 ®® oopopgPopo' V. f O ✓�—'".421., • O •i' Q •°g• S�®i�/ t,:c..0,, '°Og°b°o0° ••1. O • • O'••• o•••• • • •' O �, f o •O; /•;e:op°popop0 } •• •• O • • •. •:; O - i . • o°c°°• �ir, rg•. --,k®a it , 11-:_op000pop0 • •• •• O i . ... O •• CO; O •O • `°�°�• �„ °op pop .,! u;Apo pogo$; O ®. • ` a • •' O • ' • + roi.,,,,jitios.:4 .... . ,: _. io: o . oo �, •.: • u: o°goo00 — = 1 10.1;t g� 1■I gogococogo;.•�.,OyO •• .11. ,''ti iiii •000•®•OOO ti.l.v11 0 ,• ul�,opo opopop, ':: Eint■ 1.. , lair► o 1.. o0000 �•,- ` II I: ►- N\ ►� ■a� ° :';g00000gog.4 • •. _ `>u1■I p 0 O A� 0 / �,n•Nc��•® 011,,, ..„... "; °0 00000°0 2+• O'O. =i n,■ O Qc7■1 � 4.■■I ,°O°D°O°o°O' " }$!11■h O •� • Q''. .1: 4 - ", ' ' I:- 1 !.', I Siis{ °°O°o°o°0°0. P,,°.o.°• III■ • •} ff 00000 •,A• -� ,1 >:■■ g0g0 0g0g0g0. • ,0 .. ' gip.—" •■11� : '`N•o•t 1I: • }i!■ O O O O O O 'O°O°' AI ■IIN ,..,-.• � .. i'II , ' , 1.0I� I •�. • 000000 0 .N!I ■IIN /il ' , � 1' � 1' �p hr �Q `;1■ O°Op0po00popo�� f•�. � ��,4i0 I - . i lll..JJJ pry�'- �.J .. oopoo o o o 0P�.� •, p•1' :1!:'•L as :e • K�' :� ... . ,` °f.1�. ,l�I O°P°O°P°P°P°O°O d` i{'g°''1 :��� �09�"/0� a" 1 �+:�': 1�$T .•O'p� �- `T< ��: '/N1 g0g°°0p°g0g0g0g0° ft.00.,° rT' ' , , ° ° ° _ ■■1 0 o°b o 0 0 0 0 o iln ■mmar, t• 'I ,I. • OgOgOgogo• fit. ■■ ° °° ° ° ° °°°o°o °) :�1: ..r■■■m r iio 0 0 0 _ �°i,-- ��o , ,:, inufumIII:1 . `1,=' , <.'. a � r� 6�,i■:,N■■1 0' 11IeBT-ry' ' • , '•r/ Ar�•�,i}�;•p,a.�„•t: %" O �•�;VQ??1111■1 ° °ooggogr 11■■ff1Tj�,yZ r,i�, C +r ( II .f ",:}. • •,,, ` '� 3.•r�3.r;., pplg�e Ort'O o 0 0 o P.`Ifet.__.yy . 1 .,ccy}d ,, `•'0c,- ,1■f■■•■Nfl•••o°o°o°o°o°o ■,,.�uu■ur■n ., `,`1- •' l _ A 218°:■fN� o O O O O 1,Nt 1.■■■lum.r] Ste• rfI 1■■■■11.L41 0. •< •,11'O .�.r 'sl,•rI i,.i1'•' � •`r' III U■i10►-_��`�w■'■e�'si`n.n■o■1• °o'$.,r 2� 1 ■•4'.�0•• • ..l:.6'il 7a ':ec 1►�■,`aya�� 6r1 n■N■i■1.■■■■11■■■1 . ,..•■■■► � C t !■ A 0 +,. 9 P R• • `444i■ 3i ".v.�i r ;_j `:,, }O�}y•.. I• t�t;r.•�lM}. �� �� !�0,■■■.■\'fN.,�?Q.<^' •;OII .U■.!a■N!, � •; � ,c� .. ��•'.^ �- c'Ue`1l ' •./„ '.4^:::`i;.�� .2Y ...a� ''11■■Uf■■1P■■■v•;•,,■■II ��■!■11■■• 4 ..'•�;: �''T'F�th''{•t�'q �:-;• .,r,• ___—— ■■BNu4.r.1ureul!■■■q, .■■1 N■. ®, �':," 'c!` 1 }� � 1 • l�i• Iiiiirl■ Jr , y y ■■■■■Nil' � ■ �t -__ _ - •••••••,� ii 1# ti. III'. •-i '•} ^ � a "'� •-dx r' ! '#1 • -- - . _- ;:,_-','-+.!. ■I \'S T. r., ,� 'It t 1 r•Jr.`s-,_,,, 2z.`:, - ".■■Ix '\ �nA.' ,�.,I .,�I n•4)`2 :mammy rC'N '_- - Q;2, 1�:. ----- -- - - 'Yeiia'i-aL ,O++p .00poo- • ' ^-llli- 1�LTl- O 00• ! , -_-_ - ', -! ■ t•' 1 • o° 0000• 0000 _ /' t•er = _ _0000000 .V — — __ = ■ e( I��o D ..Do•Ppo', '' r' °000000 =— . ——c-.. ■ Ir 1!!•°o°�.fZi- o• _ 000000000 .�2�lM •_ i ^ b. -_-- 0000000000 - __ ` 71�7 l Nr■■�.s 4.i i k,,„„ 6 • ' t.,. S e c & —___,00000000000 a ■-�■!!1 [ ' „ v .:.. •�•f;. - 'O.\ i, c o0000000000•.c ` �—+.1 � • "' ( ••• "'' 4s:1`' .�'(' ��•000000000000•• -I- 1 / ! � � `3LJ• (,• }•' `� 0000000000000•' - • � C}' •�C+SJ'. C•ti,�y'F.L f4,'� w. 0000000000000,5 -- I A` (, }F'(;.'J,.t, i,17i'fE•.�d.`;;..,..,�,: imp + • V000000000000000 • ___ arr`401r'rbsi 0."' 1■.N■••erou■■■eu1 r ,.�' , ' Je,• �'• •00000000000000: -,„„ale_ >*. ', 'g=y�" .'• o000000000000 : .il . _ �iC�=' l<�' 'e.,'�� ' ✓r o0000000000•„ ____ _ . ` i• : 1 •}" '000 ',+!;jI of■\OO'�^� • �411 ■Ue� �12!!!I• �ji„•:1)`<U"•.i 41'' lir: : ::ligoimurr, ` race. I,■ ---_—_ _ -- — r o•� :• alai uwar•' _ �. . r YI •.:• •;,. .IIIm I'■r.mime 11■N••■ Jq — --- __' � J0\0 •P lu■ Ilo'uNi.�- =. fWI-�- 1♦ t■\.-�. •.�• 111■IIIlia°■N■■■■■N■■■e■■1�:" _ _ -.°oo-__ J '•• _• 'siii '.- !■■■el • q •� an 'r __- -- 0000 =- +� ( 000 .”'.:::::•::::::::::::- �11fi;_%i: r. 1h, IT•••••'y Mini - - -- --oopoo',- •".7:s., : •;.., ' '�� ` '. - - ----•000'-_--e`r,' �': •. -•1 ,�a�fir, Inau■■■.■f■B■1 MENN•'•,_ _ -___ _11, ^,}- Fr i ..:ff, �I. A .. , �:.!111111 il.■mel '.'111■11 II -- - - ----^ .> "! I t-'!ff11■■N.1 �%„illl■11 II 1�' _ --—__ _ v:-!%.t, • - �.. � �::ar :iii:i��Ne.!inNu■N■i" — _ S>._➢_�fk_ ...`'~`� f :_i if:• Iis3. 11 C �11■■\�r�i�ili 1,#�' ::,'r"o),•+. - 'ri., _ -° .0000 fib 00000.. ,f�.t, ' • ' 1■{41-I•' ve IILI■■■:e■■Ii °' _-- ----__ °'r' 0000•k. 000000 r •-"• !+ 4%e■1'f■I- >. 111 }, - -- ------ - 00000 Ct.- '�� oo0000`1, 74`�, I noc.: •:li ■■m,J_ _____ I�,'1�- - r.c• •000.,- .000000.•;., .•Ifg •,., -�• •■uNp.i'n•%ir`i 1^•• __ • _ z 17" o. _ • 000000•- •n �Nr,en, • 1 — ------------ 1?,00000e� �.c 000000 • .. .d,'f'• y Ij., .. .1:',-•'•• __--—_-_-_ -- •.Gr, 'r • • 1 - • 1 " CC--I..r,_—-------- LAND ELEMENT j. „ • . -- -am---r _- S. ' '_ _ r - single' Family Commercial _ - ------ Lov , Density == _ Office Of e Park f_ Multi_ ariiy . \� c_ p __ r .11 ,• l s Medium Density:, pP°°° , _I =_ oopoo°°, PublicQuas -Public 1 ----- _ y Main -l=aM oopoo: :•,�•-' I , I • 'a' v . -",". 1, '•j, rfl`" ':.1,i } - a: ,1. , ,0,iiIiii,"....,- •' , .-_,,,„_--, - . , • • am' Light Indust '' Recreation. ' \:o, • 0' Heavy InduSrial k e.Z. ;r , ''Greenbelt • ____ -Manufact• uring Park ; = = / Multiple `Option 1 ,,, : . 0 , .i; ‘.._,,I '''..,, •,,, ;• ,.' . ..i''''''''1''':‘''''''''1:'S .1-.:L..:':'':''''. T , 'ir\---: . -' :--,:'''''.:....:.:'I ' �, G, Op0°0°gogogo0°Op0 J ~l '` O O O O O O 0 I :i.:11, O O O O O O OOOOOO�`70p0p0p0p0p0000 gogogogo°o°o°o • •'.t• , •` .n TABUS A710N . n .. <..«x.„ - . < .x x..e _ . sea Aim teasas SF ' eu�atn tao®ano aF % _ • FoamAW 84d00 SF. _ , ` toaanoa sass H ` ;\\--Ii ,\moo - Conrad Psalm to m ., I:"1 1 , �� - TCt Patllq 202 .•.. • • : •'''.', • .-'...-... '_.-- T::::: ..,._, '''- • ' . ' .-::: ' u ja..7;,...-..,_,41-.-,, • • _- .. . a C.) \• .•,..,.•_.._:_.._,,,. . 0\\ ' \\\A,.. , " Future Phase I . -. -_ V C — _ lo H: .. . . .. .gym ., xmn 0 >m5 ....._•. . ., ... in 0 _ •_ . . . ,\c. .,„ 0 ., - \_, 2 \• .\ `esr a tooaar ®,..m. m m•..x W Q¢ • • U� <.��.. }..< "31dL"�•14h1C6.__�_.` ,.- �F.` LEGAL DESCRPTION _ ( ll ( IIIIII„(liliiik IIIUiiil ! Illl�L� ' ' 1 ' I ; UIIII ( Illllr,l 7 • " ;_ LI Phase I. ; ,,`••� ��91.4-Qt.: 1 - ' AL-- ( ' V 1 1 I 4) j ii,!: 1 1 `N _ ,..- s\t. ' ___) • „-. ... 1,. -•-.1. (\':411711-41IP: Itrl. ' - ":. :'''..-1:.•-,,,„:-= . — ! - 44 ‘. _ r 9an-o' tI \ _ - fIR�\t'; p•�:.v,gy,lruy.. rr • II i .-. 4. :- _ S = • ��j �•• EEC! i • -,.1 �� +: EMI . •. --- ADMAC Building �, _ - - _ li VICINITY MAP wo sees — ' -- - and`.rs 1Y-a y(A V,' _40///t - - - �_M.d_dd� - _ -- -- - --"-- - - - ' 4 1:77N . .. p� Way.•�.- RL'RY{./x!L'V _F.,l „" • � I �' .-Ka,. �FIa}T _ .0i•*w. t I" :I' %— .�,,•N,mks - '' _i:.. .TF... - `-TSMaeaw n•awa_ -— H p.weu.h n qlf� t H! '� p Future Parkin0 -- 4. .ton'atYs'oo• '1- • "' j•i•.w_u l�iii. 1r- --c.+�,e,r,r-vd :�.....I. K —_�.�'I 1 ' : I 1 ' ` -- -- (,a so, sor eq . . <_ .. .wens ••erlffl1� •••.`ti1. L.. .. W �•_� �F.•t*�++;.r.} ..�..�..�.. t31.1E-tilliilltr-1t. �:_i:-q ..n,..•. - AD- --� SITE PLAN . yi": NI ,�• - �� •' t y i� w$ Landscape Araw2 8 4 i ; t , ../....,..• '‘;''' 7 -'14 • 1 .• { .• ---j,.' ./._,...i-'•.' . .. • . . '_3`•:w,:.'-=v w MAV _.'.+Y.W`CC N_ON �.,� , /: s • I • ( ' ---- --� - I ._ ... . _ . 1- I •,/ C..a�E<T + I AO•O eeool Yflt wa o w J I� 1 • Chas .e-0-aa� _ SITE PLAN esaa.vo A•1 ' ,: • •• I SA-057-86, V-058-86 AII�4AC (FIRST CITY_ EQUITIES) . . • NACHES AVE. SW • • . , (kik.\• � ��'' i: 'Oibi • to tt ►�.` rJ r 1ei l.074 *; �►A.:'544:::.�� "�_ : • ` . t a F'=' '�' - n't)04 4: ',- - ---;>1! :11• ' S• , • fiOl �i. 1 , . ,. i I.] (__ :/,\\‘',,lks..."411::,,,...i....il, ,,iii. , z t c .... of 41 1A Q� •/l• '. • iw, •• jj` 1�! f— h 6 I z 1�4 y1 • I } , i. ' 01''-lltil!: ,1#,' • • ' -''; .' . * ', . iifirf,Z 1 f, i'', -s . ,, . ', 8 ;'" , • 1 1 POWELL AVE. • Fti! I„ • Al � , I: .. . , .. • •tip •., - ' • ,_q. e _ 3 , . , , ' "� I" Rlnt City Equltlo� . Z -•BLACKRIVER CORPORATE PARK ! • �'" .f €�E. • ADMAC r 5 I `'` ¢o$ t�,nton,Wastgn>0ton . . i �, . . • ; , . '',1' . :'' •• ; . .! • . . • • ;'.'•"1 I! !•:, • . , •„ . • , 1:;1•.;;: - -i! I ! ' ! . , . • , . •,.. . ' ,' • , ' . . , . • • • • • , . , . . • . . . . . . . . . . • . . . . • . . 1 . SA-057-86, V-058-86 . • - , . r- ADMAC' (FIRST CITY EQUITIES) • , .. . 1 ' • . . . . . . • . . ,, . . . -- -• \ --- • :-- li 's • . - i ,r .-- ........., ..... • . ...:_,-- . . If . i . . .,:'''''• '...... / . 1 ' I • .. - .. • . I --.-------- . • if pl-kA5K.-1.-•- '.-- Fl • / ct PROPOSED NACHES '• ..------ • r . .0 . 4\J • / 4 . . . . . • 4 - , > 4.:. ' .F.' , , • • O .1 1.• A .-- . / . i• • . . . . • / . , I ' I .--,--' ! ..";•••• , I . • , • i ' . . ' • I So. SO' SS. • : • .' ! . ' • !: '.., . 1 . /' Z• • ' • .'1> 4.-.,._--] i . • . m • A , : • . n i '1 t. ;>,, Q • :I ; • , . . z : • i 4=--.7.-7 i I ! , , • • !ff. i ,.. i I C I 1— a ; C) 1 1 1: . . / . ,r VI ' -• 1 8 ; . .P.M ,— 4 . • ,- n ;; , —1 2 m ! i . • .. . , . m._, 1 x ! ri 1 , 7 0 ---4— ' I I ! %kr 1, / . . . . 11 ...., 1?. • • • . , . __,A____...____ . 3:. 1 .. . . • , . • • . • 11- . . I 1 1 p • . . / • , . . .. . ---_7 J.-71 • • ' L . p . • . • . / ' . • , , I / . i i , i , r, < \ ...,_.,./ li \.\.\ • . / • 1,,\\ 12 o VA I PI • 0 L, = \,. LA l rl -0 M 0 '". ‘A\I , \ Vi 73 / o,.. 4 a \. .., 0 •,, . q , . , • i K ',! . > !,1 §141 1) . -------150 )/..7111---' ill'. 1 . / \ --'-'" -'''. .- / • . d i ...,....,..,-..._:...T.-.-- . / i i 1 • ' ii ''5.___ i ./ ---1 . • , . . , . .. • i NACHES AVFI•SW. EXTENSION ._. __._____ • - i 4 . . rft: 00.''''''N. . • -- ._-_ BUSH,ROED&HUTCHINGS,INC. a-60'1N.* • , 9. cr i BLA( 'ER CIVIL ENGINEp1S&LAND SURVEYORS " SEAL '''' • Tc---1•!'.. *-)k ' :7. , •-':. '. --. .' '—' BRH . SEA TIP E WP.98102. . . . . . . . . . ...... ,. . ... , ..................., - ` L • t f .. , '' ''',t 5 ; SA-057-86 , •V-058-86 ; ADMAC , (FIRST CITY EQUITIES)- . s ' U, : } • , 1 • 1111 1 d �IIIIIIIIII f we 11111111T I:.l Il .II 1 Li ' I MI i i n. Vii . lull .../..3— ' , :-,..n_-_- __. _[ _ I 165.11 .r : IIIIIJi . • ■ll■i 1 t - - • ■.■. 1���� — ' 1:11 1■_■I I IIIIIIIIIIII 1■.■. _ - U - ■ti r um■tom■ N I'll q 1 I N•4 • �i I . .+ W - N r 1 113 6 v a First City•Eq e'': • BlackRiver Corporate Park a 3 ° ADMIAC Building t'J d , ,' Renton,Wastlington o S e '' , ° REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIV QT.ON: T-OC/Cr diCrEGa . •: SNT- 0 APPROVED„_ , • , , E. APPROVED 'WITH CONDITIONS.. ' .0NOT APPROVED • 'r' ' , ;241,"-zoo-1:10'' ' /3-4.-. 4--e-a....-Q___. • . TM . _ ..•. , ;,./Li /44/64 4.0t,e4.,,(10//.,.) . 4-ei - 4 - : • • - . --ieL5.4.),7, -et-. ,/-i,.-,...,_a,. , - .... ;r0 . e0 ,.// " .F.21,-(2))et. Z&"'e.,./z-ft, /*_cdo .) . 4-1 a / .. ' 4;44,,......„077642/ • , , %zei 37q4-_ --- , 7.1e.ret.44:4,......q._ * -4. .. .„,„,./.--, c , . , , L�y2 14 w DATE: 7 f q ge„, SIGNATURE OF' DIRECTOR' OR AUTHORIZED, REPRESENTATIVE 5 • . REVISION 5/1982 • • Form 182 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : :" :70C ' . ' . . - ' ' • - • ' APPROVED ' : APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS El NOT APPROVED . • . . • - ' • - • (7: .,,. _„,.._. . . ./ . , .. . . . . , . , ��F: : 'C- /7//fif �,> :DATE: � `- SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE ., • L., REVISION 5/1982 ; 1 ' ' ' Form 182 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : frixe aEP7 • flAPPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS :'[? NOT APPROVED .. ''- , .A.ex •, aci eA E,e s yeFAC E .eEf7 ai,;,o F� `/.eE ...6 4-P77 sac Ess . .2. S o//A.e.os No T .l e,1e a V C.o s Aor L/S e: r. 3. �. fr/;10 A/C'7- etc ( a cv E..° , ON E E41.4 E,vcy A-c.c Esss ;2aAD. L� p ccEsg S'Are-" E.v' i " ` :02LIF o F, - F.EoH7 o w EX.A. AcJ.-. , s.ccu • m uST •,C3E /.c/ "eic.0 i `.esP v ' .+q . p.c.0 F,,eE; E. PCC ES'S /2o$, S All 4S7- .a..E .Q•Lh• W EA 771 E,C sv,r .doc 6 Atto '' W/7 'f' Rsp 4;y�Cooc.C'.E%E P"e/02 %o Fit'?�"'k• r 0,, - . ,._ .. :r . k'. . . . . :. DATE: _ .- ; - REVIEWING`,"D'EPA'R.TMENT/DINT-c`T:O'N:, •••L_,.. ,-4t'. . - 1 El APPROVEp:``~ ' ' ,;,�--APPROVED ..WITH'=CON•D°TTIO`NS' r ; �. ' . NOT APPROVED ! ..w . ''''' ''../,,r> , ‘c4"2-.<2,.kt:-i,W..-L. ne:1,74_:0_,, c,,a,zz_ , , . . Y ' a 14/.e_.. ... A cue-,/5, - • • " , �t 1, • • • 1, • • t' • .. :DATE _ ' .. . . SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED •'REPRE'•SENTATI•VEi,! . .' ' . REVISION b/"f1 982 ' . orm 182 ;il . • REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION ; a c ` f- i.7,e--c � •'• ..- '+ Ei A' PPROVED - PP a AROVED".•WIT ,CONDITIONS , : ® RO NOT APPVEDA 11 v iY•H1. �. • - ' „ir.r..e..04;:-144. • y •,, i - bl A'4.-4`)1"."°c7 , . e •Pc,E.A-- 7e.AP-,,, f-,-- • - ,.• • ., ,v)i A, .. , • , : . : :., .. , • - • ;, . . ... , ! l./, • (,./ 7,-.6-. . ' , , . ,by)-6,,,,,, 64k(407 ,, . „ • , . . :',,,i,j_..,e' .ati..tc+0, ‘ . .- :. ,Y ./tt- 4.„,,_i • :-. - 66.:, - I ?ao . . , . , , . ,, , , .„. , . : . ..oti. i ;.:. .._-(..., <j‘a?,,,.,,,,„7- ,Zo#,-34,41 ((,,y, "9 . • . - 74---,--`' .DATE: � .5 SIGNATURE OF "DIRECTOR-:OR AUTHORIZED '.REP,RESENTATIVE" - • ,- - - • " ' - REVISION S' 1982 , •!E'orm 182 ,l • REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION ; - (/77/4/T FA./ /N4..E.e/A/6, EJAPPROVED• APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS , : " 0 NOT APPROVED , . ,, . 'S s - , '• . . ITA, ^- ,,•,. . .PST TV . . �.. A •.': 1z 1 t: -W �=SEWER yas ,'5- 32 3.. ►To EY 1- & Mj ' 5/ 71 7 ,,....'„:„ • • . :CHRGWATE . s 4•. : = , ,. , . -- :oin �B11QT 0RESWER . :�ES . ' ' � spool: TAPEA`cARSWATER ye $o,o js4. €r. A 35 /9'3 u— fi2 AO7 - . � - _ SPOUBBBESSOT,AES CHARGE. SEWER NO / 7. . APPROVE®WATER:PLAN --' ..'.. „.. y.Es • ZS, Z/S., • 1.000vED too PLAN . : .•:)'..;., AKR,0{m.FIPERTDRANT LOCANs: `' T :' . • 7.., ":'or'' ,i • Qv'2,7 Ov i-;!' .4.. y/ci%✓in '. .FIRR~DE?T: pz ', . Mel p Sf,(0i0//✓.G- ALA //i 4.s.6 .f. • .� IA ip 144 'A WiT s4).-FT6'5 o/V iW14P ,!'. / ' • DATE: 7 / / rLD : \CTI NA71:I'�.0 AI: 11TDFf Tf1D no "M1TIJADT7Gil DCDDCCCMTATTVC ::. i -- . REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIV ON; �'� ! " ; APPROVED • 0 APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS' NOT' APPROVED • • - . 3' C:7.-] t_E 3----" ,?r, �� DATE: • _ ' .1/'?:'64 SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR. OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE:; , REVISION 5/1982 - Form 182 • • • • • • • • i. . • • Ir` ' �. ! I . i d i • M I,�; t •• ' li ,;,� ' ' ifq,1,.: . , • rAlk• • . . . . . . . . .: . .',- ;':.7; :''5' •'' •, I. !':':,'1:"p:!;11:1'ii;If!:.,'1:: 14,14 x 1 ' I 4fEe •••', .; ir i ;;;: ;1 ..,•1 . iftl-rr:- - - - . . - . • ,...,- ..,,t44.0-4.X.''...• - • ,, __ .•....Vg`. - .. ''Yx 0,- %.,.....nisVv,,AN' ' . ., "' .I ' ':::ti•• .' \i • ' • , . '. :. . ' ' ' ift2,, ,,J.•• • . :,., • ;, •• ,,••••1`::1'-••!:.,, .., • , , .. '', •:'':! ',• ' " . !,;.;•',1,.',. : ...,.• . , _. , —. . 'a,,k-.,. . , 1. • , , , .. . , . , • '7;13)mw . ' ' CITY OF RENTON . ' . . . . • . . . . • . . . ql'''''. , • ' ' Fp) -, FIRST CITY/ . JUL"t4 1986 . '. . SCHUMAN ' BUtI DWG/ZONING DEPT: • ' ' . 1...; July 14, 1986 i , • , . . . . . „ ,. ' • i . , . !•• . , . . . , . . . . ... , . ! Renton ' Environmental -Review Committee, . . . . . . . , . CITY OR .1.1ENTON- , ; • ..- • '.; ; '' .. .• ••- . , . . , 200 Mill'i venue4 • S. - •• : • I , . . „ , .•.,. . . . Renton,.;WA.".-9.8055 - * • . ,,,. . ; , Re; APIIA0 .;8ite plan Approval and ; ' '; • . . . -' . Nachea Avenue Cul-deTiSaC Variance . - bLACIOXVER• cORPOIOIti4 PARK Gentlemen: ,• - ',- ,,,' : ,•'i !::''-. ', ,-• •,,, , , • ' - - .,: , :,,, .i.„,'--;,, .,.. ,,,,-':.: ;::::,, ," , ,,,,'.., ,,,,,,,f,,, •-.:.; ,,•..: ,:. , - , -... , . • . ,,,,, ,, , ,, GentIenlero : .., ' , , ' ,.; -', , :- . •.:. , ' ' . . , " , . .., . . . • first .. .."Ci•ty ...,' Developments., Corp : agrees to dedicate and construct IIIP •..: roadway for .-NraclieS ; 'Avenue' from • S.W. •lth Street to the ' • . . . , temporary . cul-de-sac . ,. 0 the •north '•:as,;Ociaecl' with the',. ADNAO , bUildinq::`. site. lOc4ted:', ,to• :' lle •:eaat. .of ;0aehep...AvenUe ..• :*. (City• of -c . • . ' Renton - I' Land Use;• '..$0!S• S-K-0$1•-86,-;!and ECE,-.05048§) We 'understand this' :letter " of ;,cOnCur.',rence'Lis required prior-'-ytO issuance of i thle—; Declaration- of`;:;;NOn: 8iOnificance' by the Environmental ,. ReVieW • •r. Committee. ':;' "; ' ' .!••• '.' ' ' :',.".',.;', ••• . •,.,••••, • .:: ,:,. ;;.,:• •• ',,,:, ...`..•,, .,•/ •: :c'', .,' . ',,. .'.;'' 'Ilt Warm Regards, ••• -4 • .• • ,- • . - • . -• :, . . .i .14-. . . •.': . ..:,1•4.:;, . •. . ,. • . •: 4 .. -- • .. • , • . . . : . . • . , . . . . , . . • •• . . , , FIRST 'OXV/PCHUMAN '' . ' ...; ' , s • - :• , . . . •• . , • . . . . . . . , • , . ,. , . 46.1.1,0alii: 77/164) , : • - :. .. . . .. . . . . . ., , ..•• . . . , • „„4„„ Moss 4 ..., ..,, . , DireCtOr. of Planning ':. • . . . ' ' ; • . . •. - „ ;„ •• • ; , . .:. ,.. . -. • 4, ,. . . ., 11, '•' ; , •,. •. -..• '• ';• .-. ::.• • -,;., . - ; , . . . • . ..,. DEM/dlp*, •-,:, -4, --, , . .., • . ;;;;,,,4:6„,„ . , , H;.•,. : •• ••. ;,..., • ; cc: Art• Hichillgq- • -: ,:- , 'Jo, il ..• --'-:,• ttoed Bob : r :, -,'; •!.- . :t ' : , ; • , . . . ,, - • , :• ,,,-•;,; -0,“;,;,.1,i41;,L.t' , ,, ,..-::-..,,Lt:;;-•7;,,,r,';':,' RoyceBeg •; ' •' • , . . . .- . -, - .... :-•;•:3;•,,•.;,•.:, preg",,Ey.4.er . . . .; , :4•.;..•,•;;.,.;:.-.. -, -,. . .. .. ,, , • •. .. .., • . . - - . 1-• ..•- • • f:.- •",••,''J"4-•••'• •4:• 'i,;.:;'-; : . . . . . . •e. .. . ; . : 4 . , , • • • „ , . • „, .. . • ; . .. , • '. ; .i.i.'..• . . . . . , .. ,.,••..!•i..,!,....;:. . . . . , . ,, . . . ., ,. .;,• ,,•,-.;;,, :-- ._. . I , !..:. , • . —''H,-!0`4re • • ". • • . - ., , : : •• , ' •.1 d:i.Thqit,'? 800 Fifth Avenue.Suite 4170•Seattle,Washingt9n 98104•(206)624-9223 ,: , . ..,.., ..., : . . . , . 2."-:-::.,',': r.,.,',,...:1: ..': .,!.:-,.., ..-.., ',,l'I.••;.,,,,.:. . . 7.. _ ______ __ .... . . ' ___________ .. 3. :; , „ • , ; . .3 .• . , , . ' " . . • , . . , • , . . . . . . . . - .. • .•, „. , .. . . . • • . • ' • . . • , ' , • ' . ..: , . ,. . ' • • , • • ' !'! , . , • ; • . . . . . . . , . .. •; , • • , . , • . •, 1 'I • , . . , 'li ri' L11.11. CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) • ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST NO.: ECF-050-86 APPLICATION NO(s).: SA-057-86 V-058-86 • a . DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Application for site plan approval to allow' the construction of a two story building having 93.170 square feet for „office. • manufacturing and • warehouse uses. and variance application to allow a cul-de-sac road length over 500 feet. PROPONENT; First City Equities • LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Black River Technology Park located on the east side of Neches Avenue S.W. at the 500 block. LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton. Building and Zoning Department: The lead agency for this amended•proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental Impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information including: 1. Letter from First City/Schuman dated July 14, 1986 regarding the dedication and construction of Naches Avenue S.W. from S.W. 7th Street to the temporary cul-de-sac to the north associated with the ADMAC Building • on file with the lead agency. This Information is available to the public on request. • There is no comment period for this DNS. Responsible Official: Environmental Review Committee City of Renton •200 Mill Avenue South. Renton. WA 98055 Phone: 235-2550 APPEAL: You may appeal this determination in writing to Renton Hearing Examiner nb later than July 31. 1986. • You should be prepared to make specific factual objections. Contact City of Renton. Building and Zoning Department to read or ask about the procedures for SEPA appeals. DATE OF DECISION: July 9. 1986 PUBLICATION DATE: July 17. 1986 . Ronald G. Nelson Larry M. Springer Building and Zoning Director - Policy Development Director • • • ichard C. Houghton Public Works Director • 1 Y OF R4, U es mti ° BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT `,1.." _'.*' RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR Z »ti o p9 MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 o 235-2540 017 0 SEP-C°° BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR July 28, 1986 Barbara Moss First City Equities 800 Fifth Avenue, Suite 4170 Seattle, Washington 98104 Re: Application for site plan review to allow the construction of a two story building having 93,170 square feet for office, manufacturing and warehouse uses (SA-057-86) and a variance for a cul-de-sac over 500 feet (V-058-86) ; property located on the east side of Neches Avenue S.W. at the 500 block. Dear Ms. Moss: The City of Renton Building and Zoning Department formally accepted the above mentioned application on June 10, 1986. A public hearing before the City of Renton Land Use Hearing Examiner has been scheduled for August 5, 1986. The public hearing commences at 9:00 a.m. in the Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall. The applicant or representative(s) of the applicant is required to be present at the public hearing. A copy of the staff report will be mailed to you before the hearing. If you have any questions, please call the Building and Zoning Department at 235-2550. Sincerely, Roger J. Blaylock Zoning Administrator RJB:JMN:ss 3008Z A • NOTICE OF AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON,WASHINGTON Audrey De Jo i e The Environmental Review Committee , being first duly sworn on oath states that is the Chief Clerk of the (ERC) has issued a declaration of non- he/shesignificance for the following projects with additional conditions imposed as mitigat- ing measures under their authority of VALLEY NEWSPAPERS Section 4-2822(D)of the Renton Municipal Code: FIRST CITY EQUITIES(ECF-050-86) Daily News Journal, Daily Record Chronicle, Daily Globe News Application for site plan approval to allow the construction of a two story building Daily newspapers published six (6) times a week.That said newspapers having 93,170 square feet for office, manufacturing and warehouse uses, file are legal newspapers and are now and have been for more than six months prior to the date of publication referred to,printed and published SA-057-86, and variance application to in the English language continually as daily newspapers in Kent, King allow a cul-de-sac road length over 500 County, Washington. Valley Newspapers have been approved as legal feet,file V-058-86.Property located on the east side offN Nechiches Avenue S.W. at the newspapers by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for 500 block. King County. Further information regarding this action is available in the Building and Zoning Department, Municipal Building, Renton, The notice in the exact form attached, was published in the Daily News Washington, 235-2550. Any appeal of ERC action must be filed with the Renton Journal—_, Daily Record Chronicle X , Daily Globe News , (and Hearing Examiner by July 31, 1986. Pd not in supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its July 17, 17 1 8 in the Daily Record Chronicle 986. R1719 subscribers during the below stated period. The annexed notice a Notice of Environmental Determination was published on July 17, 1986 R1719 The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of $ 20.79 Subscribed and sworn to before me this 23rd day of July 19 86 ,47,7 i , eCZ 416-C.- /, ,,CZ-e. ' . Notary ' lic for the State of Washington, r.;._Y C,_ residing at Federal Way, 1 8 1, (1 I�, f1 �(' --, King County, Washington. l S I�n I C I' ` I r? i"! VN#87 Revised 10'84 di • + i AUG 7RR '19 BUILD NG/zONjf G DEp T. 1199N NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE - RENTON, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a declaration of non-significance for the following projects with additional conditions imposed as mitigating measures under their authority of Section 4-2822(D) of the Renton Municipal Code: FIRST CITY EQUITIES (ECF-050-86) Application for site plan approval to allow the construction of a two story building having 93,170 square feet for office, manufacturing and warehouse uses, file SA-057-86, and variance application to allow a cul-de-sac road length over 500 feet, file V-058-86. Property located on the east side of Naches Avenue S.W. at the 500 block. Further information regarding this action . is available in the Building and Zoning Department, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington, 235-2550. Any appeal of ERC action must be filed with the Renton Hearing Examiner by July 31, 1986. Published: July 17, 1986 • 1198N • CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST NO.: ECF-050-86 APPLICATION NO(s).: SA-057-86 V-058-86 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Application for site plan approval to allow the construction of a two story building having 93,170 square feet for ..office, " manufacturing and • warehouse uses, and variance application to allow a.cul-de-sac road length over 500 feet. • PROPONENT: First City Equities LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Black River Technology Park located on the east side of Neches Avenue S.W. at the 500 block. LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton, Building and Zoning Department. The lead agency for this amended proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information including: 1. Letter from First City/Schuman dated July 14, 1986 regarding the dedication and construction of Naches Avenue S.W. from S.W. 7th Street to the temporary cul-de-sac to the north associated with the ADMAC Building on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. There is no comment period for this DNS. Responsible Official: Environmental Review Committee City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055 Phone: 235-2550 APPEAL: You may appeal this determination in writing to Renton Hearing Examiner no later than July 31, 1986. You should be prepared to make specific factual objections. Contact City of Renton, Building and Zoning Department to read or ask about the procedures for SEPA appeals. DATE OF DECISION: July 9, 1986 PUBLICATION DATE: July 17, 1986 /Ronald G. Nelson ` Larry M. Springer Building and Zoning Director Policy Development Director • 'chard C. Houghton Public Works Director CITY OF RENTON i1 FIRST CITY/ JuL14196 S(HUMAN BUII DING/ZONING DEPT. July 14, 1986 Renton Environmental Review Committee - CITY OR RENTON 200 Mill Avenue S.. Renton, WA 98055 Re: ADMAC Site Plan Approval and ' Naches Avenue Cul-de-sac Variance BLACKRIVER CORPORATE PARK Gentlemen: First City Developments Corp agrees to dedicate and construct the roadway for Naches Avenue from S.W. 7th Street to the temporary cul-de-sac to the north associated with the ADMAC building site located to the east of Naches Avenue. (City of Renton Land Use No' s. SA-057-86 and ECF-050-86) We understand this letter of concurrence is required prior to issuance of the Declaration of Non-Significance by the Environmental Review Committee. Warm Regards, FIRST CITY/SCHUMAN %41(ihU.tt /747 ) Barbara E. Moss Director of Planning • BEM/dlp • cc: Art Hitchings • Bob Roed Royce Berg Greg Byler 800 Fifth Avenue•Suite 4170•Seattle,Washington 98104 (206)624-9223 Real Estate Development and Investments +�}� ".�;a ,+ " 'gI . `� +3��¢,f�4��...,. ‘ ;yry; ` „ye +T 7 rY+ 4 ; ;:: :; '; : tt �i•�',T i'`RK I{4t",v� 1 4 ,N?" 7', --44fr. ?'"al`��.t4'�:Z. '.{,i'r"'x,4 t-7 7r .tr t:' l "w}-+.1r •,�y � „ 45c �� j. r , ,; .;ilr. {i t t Y'7•.,., § '�. k r w' erN fdk,..1, r .YF :41' Wit, jl "<" r ✓4 'r 4. i i t. 1+ i ir' i , r r! 4,� „c�, Q/', r.4 +x�c,k. 1, }4rf �., 7,ri wv jg {r *J ' 344y7t.a�, ..:,1 �•' �Yk, 47 •J' �y •° C �t "]i;i F'� ri.}p, d !7x i ''m»,x1++,p�k Y k •r r t -`"'�r• f 7{Ar f r t r y • 'ii t " F u .x ,,,,tea. < f' 5�•.:+n x4+ $,+' 17 {p3• ty' _ r , `�i u k} r n Y- Z ;7 1� 'F C ,r1 "r +rt t }a f i•4c t.F i y{,S sn°� tr � 7, ri i Y , . ', :f'.'.{.,, 1 .rF^-t c „' Leason,Porrieroy{N rthwestilnd RoAyce ."Berrg;A 4A�114 Vine Street(2nd&Vine)Seattle,WA 9812,1(2Q6)728 57711,; SA-cb`1-81. -PI Cf V—c6a jtb TRANSMITTAL • TO: Ms. Jeanette Samek-McKague DATE: July 1, 1986 City of Renton Department of Zoning PROJECT: ADMAC ` 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 PROJECT NO: NW 86007 ATTN: RE: Adjacent Property Owner List NUMBER DESCRIPTION 1 Certification of Notification of Adjacent Property Owners/ Site Plan with Addressed Postage Paid Envelope. REMARKS: For Site Approval Process. Under Separate Cover. HAND DELIVERED BY: Y. Ken K. Chin . icc. Barbara Moss, Transmittal Only Greg Byler, Transmittal Only • 1 RCITY OF R1P1E�1 NT1 ON1�! � �y J 'ri11�710ERTIFICATION OF NOTIFICATION OF ADJACENT PROPER L WN / I BUILDING/ZONING DEPT. * # *FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY* * * • PROJECT TITLE: ADMAC BUILDING APPLICANT: FIRST CITY EQUITES APPLICATION NUMBER: SA-057-86, V-058-86 The following Is a list of adjacent property owners and their addresses. A notification of the pending site plan application shall be sent to these individuals as prescribed by Renton City Code. Chapter 7 Section 38 of Title IV (Building Regulations) of Ordinance No. 1628 relating to • site plan approval. ASSESSOR'S NAME ADDRESS PARCEL NUMBER C & P S Railway Company (Not Avalible from #132303902-01 King County Assessor) Contact: Burlington Northern Railroad 2100 - First Interstate Center 999 Third Avenue Seattle, WA 98104 • ASSESSOR'S NAME ADDRESS PARCEL NUMBER • • • CERTIFICATION I.Y. Ken K. Chin , hereby certify that the above list(s) of adjacent property owners and their addresses were taken from the records of the King County Assessor as prescribed by law. ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a Notary Public. in and for the State of Washington residing at on the l s'% day of �- Q� _ SIGNED: .�� ^ _. CERTIFICATION OF MAILING , hereby certify that notices of the public meeting on the subject site piar;'approval•were mailed on . to each listed adjacent property owner as prescribed by-saw. ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me. a Notary Public. in and for the State of Washington residing at on the day of ' • SIGNED: FORM 208 OF RA, A •, 13„;za ° BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT s ,., RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR 9 ` " � MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH.98055 ® 235-2540 0414 SEPT- BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR June 27, 1986 Barbara Moss • First City Developments Corporation 800 Fifth Avenue, Suite 4170 Seattle, Washington 98104 SUBJECT: ADMAC BUILDING FILE: SA-051-86 V-058-Eb Dear Ms. Moss: The staff of the Building and Zoning Department have done a preliminary review of the above referenced site plan approval application. In order.for us to proceed in a timely manner. it will be necessary for your firm to supply to the Building and Zoning Department the following item: Provide first class stamps and mailing addresses for all adjacent property. owners so that we may notify them of the pending site plan approval application. This is a requirement of the City's new site plan approval ordinance and is required of all applications that go to the Hearing Examiner or are done administratively. Please also fill out the attached certification of notification form disclosing who the adjacent property owners are and have it notarized and return it along with the stamps and labels to this office at your earliest convenience. Sincerely. Roger J. Blaylock Zoning Administrator RJB:JFL:ss 2499Z • Attachment . OF R4,A off, ,• ° BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT o z RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR •0,9 0 � MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 235-2540 � 09q��D sEPS�M��P BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MEMORANDUM MAYOR 25114alCbCo es Iv-t Dcavv 4`C n-1 5E121... 4N80o' •AA`M PL. (1:: . O c-D1 - ,V -OB 41/41-Nb '.LA MAL 1ty -o,,et..Ic1c‘. Cl P I--i-0n tJ e3a" 1?O "Rk-e- L-E cey4c..- WtroC Crcre-• kit)v\--b Ger- Tr&-2 P%zett - Q OF (wtet a c- Prtcsin D PRP 4�c t'� `rb o f P Q.b -rip c-gr6ry Pw-i-)S Gov,.t1escr �yw►t�+� l�h.�.z� € '`� ."-AN 7 - A eJ4r-Q-+V b `e' / �1� ma,a) S&. `►.rc. r 1'L.ct��e.. 1 4(IE 4 wn c a 1&iu p> (0� �C�i��ila""� -•-''�2 +�'`�s�y"') ("A 41 � b`S. C.�e q ASLS D� M 'z.�'Z v1=Y+^ • ....___. -._ .__. -==�•. ---�--•----._.. _,_�-� �..__.._.= .._fi•-..M:••�.��,-,�. - _ -, OF RA,�� POSTED 6-25-86 ( Z Cli T E 04,4?eo SEPTA 1' OF PENDING SITE pLAN AppLICATIoN DESCRIPTION : SA-057-86, V-058786 APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF A TWO—STORY BUILDING HAVING 93,170 SQUARE FEET FOR OFFICE, MANUFACTURING AND WAREHOUSE • USES, AND VARIANCE APPLICATION TO ALLOW A CUL—DE—SAC ROAD LENGTH OVER 500 FEET. GENERAL LOCATION AND/OR ADDRESS: LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OFNACHES AVENUE S.W. AT THE 500 BLOCK. PUBLIC APPROVALS REQUIRED : 1. ) SITE PLAN APPROVAL 2. ) VARIANCE 3 . ) BUILDING PERMIT PUBLIC COMMENTS WILL BE RECEIVED BY THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT ANYTIME PRIOR TO PUBLIC HEARINGS AND DURING PUBLIC HEARINGS. ***** • COMMENTS WILL BE RECEIVED UNTIL 7-9-86, 5 : 00 'P.M. ***** FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CALL THE CITY OF RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT 235-2550 THIS NOTICE NOT TO BE REMOVED WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION ti(c o i�'TTY OF RENTO� FILE NO(S): -- � -�L '�: "01BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT V —OS�-S� ♦ •� • E - - -- APPLICATION NOTE TO APPLICANT: Since this is a comprehensive application form, only those • items related to your specific type of application(s) are to be completed. (Please print or type. Attach additional sheets if necessary.) APPLICANT I I TYPE OF APPLICATION NAME • FEES First City Equities, ADDRESS Q ) REZONE*(FROM TO '— _ 800 Fifth Avenue,: Suite 4170 d SPECIAL PERMIT* CITY Seattle, Washington ZIP L 98104 TEMPORARY PERMIT* CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT* TELEPHONE SITE PLAN APPROVAL (206) 624-9223 Q SPECIAL PERMIT FOR GRADE AND FILL No. of Cubic Yards: CONTACT PERSON VAFromCsection: q-I IDS - --7 K NAME • * Justification Required Barbara E. Moss (Director of Planning) ' ADDRESS SUBDIVISIONS: ' 800 Fifth Avenue, Suite 4170 Q SHORT,PLAT CITY ZIP [D TENTATIVE PLAT Seattle, Washington 98104 Q PRELIMINARY PLAT TELEPHONE (206) 624-9223 FINAL PLAT 17-3 WAIVER , (Justification Required) • OWNER . NO. OF LOTS: NAME PLAT NAME: First City Equities , ADDRESS PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: 800 ,Fifth Avenue, Sutie 4170 1:::7 PRELIMINARY . CITY Seattle, Washington 98104 FINAL • TELEPHONE P.U.D. NAME: • (206) 624-9223 C] Residential Q Industrial aCommercial Q Mixed LOCATION MOBILE HOME PARKS: PROPERTY ADDRESS (to be assigned) ± 600' N. of S.W. 7th on Natches Avenue. CD TENTATIVE ED EXISTING USE PRESENT ZONING PRELIMINARY Vacant MP FINAL PROPOSED USE PARK NAME: - • ": Office and Manufoturing'..Facil ities NUMBER OF SPACES: -�� ® ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEEr?;v- SQ. FT. ACRES AREA: 187,9222 4.3 TOTAL FEES , • • ITV Orr RENTON TAFF USE ONLY -- ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESSING vk sP 2 0 APPLICATION RECEIVED BY: L JUN 1 198� APPLICATION DETERMINED TO BE: • ED Accepted BUILDING%Z0'NIN`.5 !iF-r: Q Incomplete Notification Sent On By: (Initials) DATE ROUTED ADDITIONAL MATERIAL RECEIVED BY: APPLICATION DETERMINED TO BE: 1 (o.—_,2_A_,___ 0 Accepted Q Incomplete Notification Sent On By: (Initials) ROUTED TO. Building /El Design Eng. l .w,Fire Jj Parks i x� Police Policy Dev. © Traffic Eng. D, Utilities a�..ft ss REVISED 1-31-84 • Legal description of property (if more space is required, attach a separate sheet). ( See Attached) • ,i AFFIDAVIT ' • • I, , being duly sworn, declare that I am Q authorized representative to act for the property owner,=owner of the property involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS DAY OF _zq , 19 ga NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, • RESIDING AT Lad enCinae. . . • • ,. Name of,.Notary Public) - (Signature of Owner) • GL c/i70 viz ` 4> 4e. . vi' /7f (Address) 101 (Address) (City) (State) (Zip) (Telephone) Acceptance of this application and required filing fee does not constitute a complete' application. Plans and other materials required to constitute a complete application are listed in the "Application Procedure." • Form #174 BLACK RIVER CORPORATE PARK, ADMAC THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP -23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE EAST LINE OF SAID SUBDIVISION WITH THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTH 650.00 FEET THEREOF, . SAID NORTH LINE BEING ALSO THE NORTH LINE OF WASHINGTON TECHNICAL CENTER AS RECORDED IN VOLUME 122 OF PLATS, PAGES 98 THROUGH 102, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY; THENCE NORTH 88 °15' 00" WEST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE 1596.50 FEET; THENCE NORTH 1°45'00" EAST 50.00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 1°45'00" EAST 175.00 FEET; THENCE ON A CURVE TO THE LEFT WITH A RADIUS OF 883.34 FEET A DISTANCE OF 165.97 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 88 °15'00" EAST 553.44 FEET TO THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF THE BURLINGTON NORTHERN RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID SOUTHWESTERLY LINE 8.52 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 1 °45' 00" WEST 290.11 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 58 °15' 00" EAST 70.42 FEET TO .A POINT ON THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTH 710.00 FEET OF SAID SUBDIVISION; THENCE SOUTH 1°45' 00" WEST 10.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 88°15'00" WEST , 605.98 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING, CONTAINING 187 ,922 SQUARE FEET FOR 4.3134 ACRES. (NOTE: THIS DESCRIPTION IS NOT A LEGAL SEGREGATION) BLACK RIVER CORPORATE PARK, ACCESS ROAD WEST OF ADMAC (NACHES AVENUE SOUTHWEST) THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 23, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, LYING WITHIN 30.00 FEET ON EACH SIDE OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED CENTERLINE: COMMENCING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE EAST LINE OF SAID . SUBDIVISION WITH THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTH 650.00 FEET THEREOF, SAID NORTH LINE BEING ALSO THE NORTH LINE OF WASHINGTON TECHNICAL CENTER AS RECORDED IN VOLUME 122 OF PLATS, PAGES 98 THROUGH 102, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY; THENCE NORTH 88 °15' 00" WEST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE 1626.50 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 1°45' 00" EAST 225.00 FEET; THENCE ON A CURVE TO THE LEFT WITH A RADIUS OF 853.34 FEET A DISTANCE OF 209.55 FEET; THENCE NORTH 12°19 '12" WEST 329.69 FEET; THENCE ON A CURVE TO THE LEFT WITH A RADIUS OF 600.00 FEET A DISTANCE OF 35.76 FEET TO POINT "A" AND THE END OF SAID CENTERLINE, ALSO THAT PORTION OF SAID SUBDIVISION NOT HERE BEFORE DESCRIBED LYING WITHIN 50.00 FEET OF SAID POINT "A" , CONTAINING 53,454 SQUARE FEET FOR 1.2271 ACRES. (NOTE: THIS DESCRIPTION IS NOT A LEGAL SEGREGATION) FIRST CITY/SCHUMAN BLACK RIVER CORPORATE PARK ADMAC SITE BRH JOB NO. 85235 .07 MAY 29 , 1986 ALH/SU DISK 8 • °elik I..HI r,77—yy 101 ck. WA , ': �� • ''c/�' ., �e05) J���a ;+'' COT O," EN O JUN101986 BUILDING/ZONING DEPT. 1 of 2 LANDSCAPE BUFFER NO. 1, SOUTH OF ADMAC THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 23 - NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE EAST LINE OF SAID SUBDIVISION WITH THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTH 650.00 FEET THEREOF; SAID NORTH LINE BEING ALSO THE NORTH LINE OF WASHINGTON TECHNICAII1 CENTER AS RECORDED IN VOLUME 122 OF PLATS, PAGES 98 THROUGH 102 RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY; THENCE NORTH 88 °15'00" WEST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE 990.52 FEET• TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 88 °15'00" WEST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE 605.98 FEET; THENCE . NORTH 1°45'00" EAST 50.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 88 °15'00" EAS 605.98 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 1°45'00" WEST 50.00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING, CONTAINING 30,299 SQUARE FEET FOR 0.6956 ACRES. (NOTE: THIS DESCRIPTION IS NOT A LEGAL SEGREGATION) ' 1 BLACK RIVER CORPORATE PARK, BUFFER NO. 2, SOUTHEAST OF ADMAC• THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 2 ' NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED A [ FOLLOWS: • COMMENCING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE EAST LINE OF SAI SUBDIVISION WITH THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTH 650.00 FEET THEREOF;I SAID NORTH LINE BEING ALSO THE NORTH LINE OF WASHINGTON TECHNICAL CENTER AS RECORDED IN VOLUME 122 OF PLATS, PAGES 98 THROUGH. 102 , RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY; THENCE NORTH 88 °15'00" WEST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE 856.35 FEET TO THE WEST LINE OF POWELL AVENUE SOUTHWEST AS SHOWN ON SAID PLAT AND THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNINGf THENCE NORTH 88 °15'00" WEST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE 134.17 FEET. THENCE NORTH 1°45'00" EAST 50.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 88 °15'00: EAST 134.17 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 1°45'00" WEST 50.00 FEET TO TB . TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING, . CONTAINING 6,708 SQUARE FEET FOR 0.154,0 ACRES. (NOTE: THIS DESCRIPTION IS NOT A LEGAL SEGREGATION) FIRST CITY/SCHUMAN BLACK RIVER CORPORATE PARK ADMAC SITE BRH JOB NO. 85235.07 MAY 14, 1986 ALH/SURV. DISK 8 ` of as 11 y Z • f � r GiSTElk A'AL LAND "�(� • 2 of 2 • E C F: I -Opp-344 to z City of Renton f ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST ' O9�TFa SEPiE • �O�P Purpose of Checklist: The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43,21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for allproposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. • Instructions for Applicants: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental Impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description.you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. 'If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply." Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. • Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies.can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or Its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impacts. • Use of Checklist for Nonprolect Proposals: (Please Type or Print Legibly) Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D). For nonproject actions (actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs), the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: ADMAC Building B1ackRiver Corporate Park (Earlington Industrial Park) 2. Name of applicant: First City Equities 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Barbara Moss ' First City Equities 800 Fifth Avenue, Suite 4170 Seattle, Washington 98104 (206) 624-9223 4. Date checklist prepared: June 5, 1986 • 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Renton Bui 1 di ng & Zoning 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Construction - Summer 1986 • Calf OF RiaNiON • • 1.1"14 N - JUN 101986 • BUILDING/ZONING DEPT. 7. Do you have any pl.' .for future additions, expansions, -a urther activity related ` ' to or connected wit;, .pis proposal? if yes, explain. Possible Phase II of the project to add 'warehouse office and site,: • area ; L=w.ith- parking as required to the North of proposed project. Phase II Landscaping to reflect Phase I concept and specific requirements to be determined at that. time. • • • 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will • be prepared, directly related to this proposal. Original E.I.S. for Black River Office Park by R.W. Thorpe and Associates Tor Renton Property Associates, April , 1983. 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other • proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. No. 10. List any governmental approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. City of Renton Building Permit and Site Plan Approval . • 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and ,; the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist i that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. 0 • Design and construction of a 93,170 S.F. two story building with office, manufacturing and warehouse uses. Parking for the various uses shall be provided as required by code. Landscape yards •to be incorporated with the parking aid building on approximately 187,922 S.F. of site, excluding a landscape buffe^ (not required) established by First City Equities as part of this phase and the, Master Plan Development. . 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topography. map, If reasonably available. While you i •should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate 'maps o� detailed plans submitted ,with any permit applications related to this checklist. Located in an existing area of development adjacent similar projects off • Natches Avenue S.W. and ±600' North of S.W. 7th in Renton, Washington • (North of Interstate 405). • • B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS ' E 1. EARTH a. General description of the site (circle one); rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other Flat . b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? • One Percent (1%) except area of drainage ditch. c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, caly, sand, gravel, peat,, •muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. Sand, Silt and gravel d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. No. - 2 - _T. • e. Describe the pur e, type, and approximate quantit of any filling or ' grading proposed. indicate source of fill. Fill or surcharge material to be used is on site, per separate approved ; . permits. Any new. structural .f.i.T.l will be hauled on site. Source unknown this f. at rosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. Site is flat, minor erosion of surface could occur on site. • g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces • after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? 75% h. Proposed measures to reduce, or control erosion, or other impacts to the • earth, if any: :Siltation and erosion control per City Standards. • 2. AIR a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., . dust, .automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and • when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Normal emmissions from dust, auto and truck equipment, and roofing during construction. • b. Are there any off-site sources of emission? No. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: • • Water site to reduce dust. 3. WATER a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the Immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. P-1 drainage channel one-half (1/2) mile away. 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. No. •• • • 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or • removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. N/A C TY O Cat 6 O —Ta 11 JUN 101986 , - 3 - BUILDING/ZONING DEPT• 4) Will the proposal •,--.7uire surface water withdrawals c .- •''aversions? Give • • general descriptio( ,.'urpose, and approximately quantal•_. ? known. . . ' . • ' I 1 ? I No. 1 • • 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on •• • the site plan. i . • Yes. 6) Does the proposal Involve any discharges of waste materials to surface • • waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. • None. . b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximately quantities if • known. • . None. • 'I' . 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from . septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals . . .; agricultural; etc.). I'' . : - Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the • I • number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or 'i • humans the system(s) are expected to serve. ! • None. • ,i 6: Water Runoff (including storm water): ' 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of . . collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will ' • this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? •If so, describe. ,i Y{ , • Storm water into storm drainage system per City Standards and to ",. detention area at P-1 channel . : 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally , describe. . • • • No. . :y• ,!"..I -,1 • .; ,i fir', • r,''..4a;rt I d. Proposed meal; s to reduce or control surface, gx d, and runoff water impacts, if any: i Storm drain system with catch basins connected to storm drainage _- system. • • • 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: 14 deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other o evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other • o Shrubs M grass • o crop or grain • o Wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other o water plants: water lily, eel grass, milfoil, other o other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? • Clear and grub all existing grass and scrub Alder except significant trees noted on site plan to be preserved. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None. • • • • d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: Grass lawn areas, combined with mix of Evergreen and deciduous trees • . . and shrubs. 5. Animals • a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: Birds: Hawk heron eagle, songbirds, other seagulls, sparrows Mammals: deer, 'ear, elk, beaver, other Fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None. . c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. No. • • any OF E ENTON PT) iWN -0 JUN 101986 — 5 — BUILDING/ZONING DEPT. • I d. Proposed mei )es to preserve or enhance wildlife, ;my: Addition of trees and landscaping. • • • • 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. • Use of gas and electric power for heat, lights and air conditioning. • b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent • properties? If so, generally describe. No. • c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: Meets Washington State Energy Code requirements. ' • 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic '! chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. ii No. • • 1) . Describe special emergency services that might be required. • N/A • 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: N/A • • b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic,equipment, operation, other)? . None. - 6 - • ' 2) What types an vals of noise would be created by. :'associated with the. ' project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. • l • • Construction noise from normal work hours 7-5 for a short term basis. ' • 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: j None: noise not significant in relation to existing adjacent uses. • I 1 • • I ' I •8. • ,Land and Shoreline Use i a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? f Undeveloped site with adjacent undeveloped properties. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. • No. c. Describe any structures on the site. • • None. . d.. . Will any structures be demolished? If so. what? • No. a. What is the current zoning classification of the site? MP .V. f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? MP .:;, g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of `! the site? ;;j;. • N/A h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive"' ` tax area? If so, specify. ti;l, No -�; • 111 i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? tf, Approximately• 165 • J. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? :4:ii None. ;; k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: >�' N/A6. OTY c 11011�ON "'�. • I ;�'s Fgj dd( •NMI t;- 7 - JUN 101986 w... 1'41 r• (,1 rl\J3'zO(` I G DEPT. p 1. Propose easures to ensure the proposal is >>patible with existing and projecte" .and uses and plans, if any: Use is compatible with adjacent uses. • 9. Housing • • a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. . N/A b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle,.or low-income housing. N/A c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: N/A • 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed. 34 ft. maximum height plus mechanical for roof mounted equipment,. Painted concrete and glass exterior building materials. . • b. . ' What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? • • None. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: • ' Articulated horizontal reveals to reduce scale of building with ;accents' • of reflected and tinted glass combined with heavily landscaped areas. 11... Light and Glare . • a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? .What time of d y • would it mainly occur? Light from parking lighting at night time. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? • i No. . c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None. • • • d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: Control light dispersion of pole lights and building lighting to , prevent glare off site and on site. • • - 8 - ' . ,j • • 12. Recreation a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the• immediate vicinity? ; • None. • • b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational_uses? If so, describe. • No. . c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: None. Provide links to jogging paths programmed around development and P-1 drainage detention ponds. 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, • or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, • • generally describe. No. • b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic,' archaeological, -t scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. • N/A • • c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: N/A • 14. • Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. Direct access to Powell Avenue S.W. and Natches Avenue, ultimately to Interstate 405 with on/off ramps at Interurban to the West and Old Rainier Avenue to the East. b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximately distance to the nearest transit stop? Yes, approximately 3/4 mile. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? 1.•58stalls .with44 future-stalls, none eliminated. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to !. existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). Would require improvement of Natches Avenue S.W. at this time (public street) and extended in a Phase I position approximately 800 .feet into the property. CITY OF RENTONrEi FUVIIVIN JUN 101986 - 9 - BUILDING/ZONING DEPT. , e. Will the projec ,se (or occur in the immediate vic y of) water, rail, or • , air transportation? If so, generally describe. No. f. .How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. See * below. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: Proximity to bus line and other developments to incorporate car pooling and transit bus use. 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for • example: `fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. Project will require normal fire protection and police protection alre•dy serving the area. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. None. 16. Utilities a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: ectricity, natural gaI water, refuse service, to ep one, san y sewe septic system, other. From Powell Avenue and the improvement of Naches Avenue. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility • • providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Electrical power, gas, water, sewer, telephone. All utilities are acc-ssi,ble from Powell Avenue and the improvement of Naches Avenue requiring min,.r excavation to extend to the building. P , C. SIGNATURE ' • I, the undersigned, state'that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non-significance that It might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Proponent: Name Printed: Barbara E. Moss • See attached 10A - Vehicular trips and exhibits and..l.e al :-descra; i• , ns • • • • • %i • • • • -10 *Daily Trip Rate: Office space = 21 trips/1,000 S.F. x 31,540 S.F. = 662.3 daily trips ' Warehouse space = 6 trips/ 1,000 S.F. x 13,097 S.F. = 78.6 daily trips Assembly space = 10 trips/1,000 S. F. x 48,533 S.F. = 485.3 'daily trips Total Daily Trips = 1,226.1 trips PM Peak Hour: Office = 2.4 trips/1,000 S.F. x 31,540.S.F. = 75.7 trips/PM Peak Hour Warehouse = 0.9 trips/1,000 S.F. x 13,097 S.F. = 11.8 trips/PM Peak Hour Assembly = 1.0 trips/1,000 S.F. x 48,533 S.F. • = 48.5 trips/PM Peak Hour Total Peak Hour Trips. = 136 trips/PM Peak Hour Base on Trip Generation and Informational Report, 3rd Edition, published in 1982 by the Institute of Transportation Engineers. Per Traffic Impact Anaylsis, Table 3 for (. Bl.ackRiver Technology Park) .B.lackRiver Corporate Park, June 1986, by THE TRANSPO GROUP. CITY C:" pEONrm . -10A- JUN 18 1986 '- BUILDING/ZONING ING DEPT. Architecture and Planning • Ipn Pomeroy Northwest,Inc.,Royce A.Berg A.I.A.,114 Vine Street(2nd&Vine)Seattle,WA 98121(206)728-5771 - • x ADMAC, INC. FIRST CITY EQUITIES Design Intent Design and build a manufacturing, office, . research and development facility for ADMAC on a section of property adjacent to Powell Avenue and Natches Avenue in BlackRiver Corporate Park (Valley 405 Business Park) in Renton, Washington. Natches Avenue is to be extended an additional 800 feet and ultimately all the way through to the north, west and back to Oakesdale Road (Monster Road). Phase One development is proposed with additional land being reserved for possible expansion of parking and building to the north. The building is sited with a large landscaped buffer to the south which is placed in a landscape preserve and provides additional future parking if ever required. In addition to this area, there is an additional 50 feet of landscape area where significant trees are to be preserved and grading and drainage will integrate with the drainage easement to the south also owned by First City Equities. This landscape area will provide links with other landscape areas within the total Master Plan concept for this BlackRiver Corporate Park, incorporating trails, bench seating areas, and amenities for employees and area workers to use. The buildings are designed of painted concrete panels with articulated reveals to reduce the apparent scale of the buildings. The use of reflective glass and tinted glass will provide accents and reflect the trees to be preserved. Outdoor patio and luncheon areas are provided for employee use and tie into paths with access to the total development of BlackRiver Corporate Park. Outdoor lighting will be accomplished with pole mounted fixtures, lights facing down with control on the light patterns to prevent glare. Surface ' mounted wall pack lights will be used on the north side of the building to illuminate the service areas and parking next to the building. Lights will also have cut—offs to prevent glare on properties to the north. CITY O RENTON nu NI] WNID , -a- JUN 101986 'W BUlL.DiNG/zoNING DEPT. .~•SIC'" ,1�4• r T.. , .ai.l' ,. • '111. 1 ..s:t141‘N '41' • - V ..,„.. I I\".•_s:,:.__IIII1 4t- "IL . ilp 4. °'0:4JP, i14 . - -�— for T 4© ow* ' , SITE . . . r , x „ ; ; �7' �me-�+ Sri ! " 1�...,,fi )° � ■ '1=1;ti ..„ • tir t .-'- pr-i. ...Kit , ..........„/„...,. ,. , . ,„.„,„...,.. ... .i. ,)„,....... .,_- . _ , ,.. , 1 i „ ,, , 4 ioiqr,.. --••,-1-.$.,-4,-,,-t-:- :-. t . • ;igt - • [ Q'Llial ,!: ,.i.nom: ,...., Myi�rs ` � I \ 7.A. �,. ', ''..... ,' rd s.'• ^�.. . Y , !-t.._...+ar i.,....r -_., .,k.N4,r. • ■t/.i tr v. r�, L; it''s • • • 9 !r� •�• F ■ f Iiiiis - . • 11.% .4iNb ` ' .L.r 7th� r ,'�' , .1 th- y �� � f y, N. i _ ; • � h* � i-i El n Ll • f �. • ,. `S: �. 1 .. 1; 1 Powe1 Ave. 1Conceptual Master Plan • ,:f II1 1 . �i sitaas I BlackRiver II 1 ►' ,� ` r'. ' , _ • Corporate Park ' }.1',1 : '` VALLEY 405 I ' CD RENTON, WASHINGTON I ,.., rISsip , . ) i---—-1 1 „ if.., 14- 4, .., , a , . , et c_ � .�,. y` pia; { �L�•++.. C +d ` Fi15T CITY EQUITIES •'} !^" �.y Y' - ";E � - sf`� -! e•ii LEASOH, POMEROY NORTHWEST T ;�h,� 1\ \ }-.;, `}'�\ Grady-Way? MITCHELL •NELSON CROUo t .. ;1• .-t'i'•�� rF7 e. 4 ,ram . .- It t ti)' '... ,. 405. r • 'f' � tuR-I�IN GYOI-4 ! i • __——— _ =NOR--1-1-Iof .H AIL 4E 7 . • ' "� • /ENE' PJE S•W � �!g G • p. \ "1 ��0 //f J *I-f� k 2A-rIp� ```_.F j/ VARIANCE • :. i. • •// SITE / LOCATION • // KWG COUNT( _ • _ C pUMP STAT101.1 -_ N __ c.iN ` TO bE O►JST. j`wy TO 5; I • SUMMER .2... Q .'f'.' It 3 5 Z •c_;j. vv• h�� • LID 332 • h _ S W n > re N j d �J METRO ,l • J < J 1 d W O 7/! DISPOSAL `� F A 4 D • 0 . Adiiiiiiip. 1:1 �55 1"Si'd7:41...i. • s...}. i� w — a • m • ..., ., , . .,. _-., a, ,:.,-,,;, -.. • .. .. - , _�• ,r pre.+ RR r.7:47 ,I1 ♦ _-,• ; lf! VLCINITY MAP. . �i a 7,74 A 4 .i14 a i.' ,•:v„': 1 .�a _ .r • JUN 1 . . v,::f:: ^.1 Wit:!r":,;:' ..L.. n.4w .;,1.. _ - .f 2. Lr •."�'Y. w . Vat i i+,,, '4: :. 't �.� ;tr,r _.> � - `'};'.-.'....c i�J.�., r,i.t�f.. y ... . .,.. ...•,_L•... ,.. A_a..a. r .:;.,:,�';^,•.. � -_.Y.Y' r4dr il - - i1b.'' 3.. ,'Gi � ,Ain. - lq".^� :.}'' o.tr 'r:.' ,�^� ..f, - .).'.•. wow :a r� - •..lK 1 t,.. b f - • ,u _ti .,d"4. .�t°+p;° ti.,.: ter. dd t :: ,fa . .� 41 =�r%t -::ter .2 .^tn5^r `.l' I�ir':: yi 1r: .s 1-•7;'"?;.:'2`:'s.`,�, ":�r `�' J. ..F .� �'Yi .zi�.n5�' •t;,.. .,.�' I..xwt,::: •��' °kr. .�,' n'Y�i' ^.�'� _ ,v „z •Y'::': W:� 'A yR;S' ..c. :'ram ,C::i,t.,iii:... �{.. ,'6` -� ..r-'.;.:,< �» '`�v:..�,�,,. :•7. _ !:. .:.Y�r mil' ;.C..i:, �,..r tF• •mil ..t -.%i:'.L�97%,•.-�1:. +.rya.,.;... IVt• I':-. _ :.� 1' •'4��3cO a". At� ..4 6.^.. a .;,r.� .t�:.` t.� �'~S.��:�''F,li=,i 3.r• `+a"`41',tS... :;N• 'F�,:f -�if'}rw�r. i•ad'�•.:tU'.. +.w_'.^ 4�r�[_�r.4"Cp'. :0`t _>R� „& ,k's�.W •y,=fi�sY t .t. ,:-i for'K,, :t .-,4•P '- ,r:e,.. q r� r„,,, .,; lt:*:, ? r: . :�,.G:-.. st1},• ,��'..- _ r-y�-. •,�s-�A.';•.Iy 1 3 L�',..,1''i*-,••=1-zigt: - �{' ,x ;i �Jf..1i5': - y A;i".F_i: f• -.-•,•-- •-':fA4'F': . n i.w. ._. ''4.4-.p" '- • , , .s't..A::.:t 4A.. 'li 4 x,,.ibn...f_.f..'Yc. -i4I�$ibZSMl:CS ..i Zn.�, �x 3. F f � 'i:g. `}.}.v 1�L. .- y t (v u c ?`' 11 M • FIRST CITY/ June 6, 1986 SCHUMAN Mr. Fred Kaufman Hearing Examiner CITY OF RENTON 200 Mill Avenue S. Renton, WA 98055 Re: Naches Cul-de-sac Variance BLACK RIVER TECHNOLOGY PARK Dear Mr. Kaufman, • FCDC is requesting a variance to the existing land use code in order to build a temporary cul-de-sac for Naches Avenue within the Black River Technology Park property. The ultimate design of Naches Avenue will extend the roadway through the. Black River property and connect with the future Oakesdale Avenue on the western boundary of the Black River Technology Park property. This ' design has been conceptually reviewed and approved by Mr. Jim Gray, an inspector in the Renton Fire Department, with Public Works Department, the Building Department, and King County, as the road would cross their property at its access point with Oakesdale. All agencies contacted have supported our design concept. As an interim construction phase, we wish to pre-improve the first 800 ' of the roadway in order to access the ADMAC property. The temporary cul-de-sac we wish to build at this time, is being done only as ; a phasing of the ultimate roadway. Adequate fire circulation will be provided by access from Powell Avenue into the ADMAC property, creating a loop with Naches Avenue. The previous owners of the property had designed 2500 ' a cul-de-sac for Naches Avenue as a permanent design, never intending for the road to extend through to Oakesdale Avenue. They received approval of the necessary variance for that design through the Hearing Examiner' s office (V-091-84.) . We are working with Bob Bergstrom of the Public Works Department to design an appropriate connection to Oakesdale with a bridge which must cross the P-1 channel. That design ' must be • coordinated with design of the future bridge • 'crossing the railroad tracks further west of our property. Since that bridge has not been designed by the City at this time, Bob Bergstrom 800 Fifth Avenue•Suite 4170•Seattle,Washington 98104•(206)624-9223 5• - .. �. Dcnl rctnfc IlcvoInnmcnt nnrl Invcrlmcn+c .,. ..._. Mr. Fred Kaufman { June 6, 1986 Page Two , feels we should wait to design and build the bridge crossing the P-1 channel (over to Oakesdale) in conjunction with design of, his bridge crossing the railroad tracks. Because of these, special circumstances, it would not be possible for us to develop the property at this time if we were required to improve, the roadway all the way through to Oakesdale. Additionally, the design of the Oakesdale L.I.D. at this time is in its beginning phases. Connection to that roadway will be designed at the time the roadway drawings are finalized. A great deal of coordination will be necessary between FCDC, the City of Renton , Public Works Department, and Bush, Roed & Hitchings, the civil ' engineers assigned to the L.I.D. project. Ideally, we would like all three projects to be designed together to ensure compatibility. : We feel that granting of the variance will not be detrimental to : the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements ; in the vicinity, nor would approval constitute a grant of special priviledge, considering the difficulty involved in ,' designing and constructing the road through to Oakesdale at this ;, time. The length of the cul-de-sac has been designed to {; accommodate the ADMAC development on the property and is ; [ minimum variance required in order to accommodate the Rento ', ! Building Department and Fire Department. I '' It is for these reasons that we request the variance and w= appreciate your consideration in reviewing our case. 'i 'I' Very truly yours, FIRST CITY, DEVELOPMENTS CORP. /721,6Lie ' ' Barbara E. Moss Director of Planning BEM/dlp = . ,f _ t . . ....,"'.''''' \• ''' " ''''''.%,f.,...r ,,,,.,.,,• 4,441MiiiiIM • . ...111 . ,• ., • . it %cil .o . j- lali i 11.• „e: .- • .1,1 ....4iv . .;.- . ., . 4, , • i .. •• o• '' ' • t II %..., ) r' ' ' :„.• A. !NI .,• ,---. It ow -t-. •.,,i,49k 91, ,., .,A ,.., -,..,4,4.4,_ ,i,,4,.:-- *--i-- . `-' 1 - 6 • SITE '. . . • .. ,i, -,,sis . 1.1,.. ;.4...07-4,ii„,1 •:4,,,,,, ., Ir'-,-__ :', .er OM -0 .-. 1411 • 1 ..4c,r !il0„..i'04.-u.-'11- . • .--1'4,8 /';.., pa-,'1, Voi '' . .1117. " . .': 1,1-'•",ibk,'"...,;;;;, .."1;millplaS, At, -(.;.h, 1 ft-, • ',..t rt 4". .1,'• ' ' •r.iM".••••••• ig i" ' •••4•I 'v..,Aft,.,b+0%, ',.:7-4. il . . . -, dr' .„ ' , '•P...N. .- ..... -''... •' ' r. ' 1V, ''. ,•.,.. , .i.,ie . I!' ..t... ;' .''. '' .ik,',`..4 \ • •..,L...'":'1"1"::,....l.t.,r1k.... ,„...:%741/44 c.'''14,-....'. .`' '. /•:,OP.... ''.' . ' illmopmmi 'i ' t 4. ...." • .44. . . . ..".... . ... ,I 1 , 'f‹,...•;:‘ .:4,..,,,,..›,r._._ ,,,.,2„,,,, ,,,.! ,_. • , _,..., , " Qini, . _. . . ..., v_ii .,, . isam.. • .. w t „....-.._ ... - ,•:,4 ..-,. /• \-- , -I, I-"4, 0, . -4--d- ,--°— -•4t . '4'''"",---' ,.. ,triv.c........H, 7,(._/. ...,,-e•-•„.,•, :1 • z.........„.. . ...if:A . •'-c.'..,,aab ' .i•.q i-,_.,',,: .' ,..":-..-it-r-.4.,r: -. •.... • ,....::::::-‹::-- ,....--.,-... 1 1 r,-...'.• 1 ' Mt Er • ' ,:•: - ...‘.•.,1 , •-•‘' '' ' --..*"..a...,,a,i.' - - ..,,,,,,„_,,.•-••••, -,. ..:/ , , ir. ....,. .i.,.. •. . 4. •- ,z.., _. . . ••f.c : •,,.! - ' - s::::';--,„=". , ::. .'. a.lin,:v ke.11 oki.,,V,ileit'''''." - l',.. ,:, 7 / ',.)(,.,;,), ,4..,-,,k,:,, ....: • ,r-.4A .. „t., sr .01/4`40*".1" '4 - I .. 11 4tt,,--S• 11/447-.11,1? t of ..,-.1------_,... --c"---.-- --------; weribile ' - ' r- • •oeff. . — •.,`..';$. 4:-• • ' -tilPOW ,,* 's,.. V.• :1621;11!.7' .--. 1 i ... • -.... %it, ... • .. . .. ----.-.......,,kagOtY ` CN, N., .1.;4:/,.i,I .d. / ,, •i:,.(5 44.;„, , 1 , :i ___ . is.% . 40. ,v,,, ,17 ,•,.,,. . : ; • .4 o' 11, tt le ! . L 1 1 • . - ,, ,,,..., . "R. 1,, ,..„ . • , ,,,,_ 1, .. k . ._J N.4 ' ',' •. N'' 4 . , . 4 . , , ' .' ''''''--......:...............eAs, ' ,.1 oi i•-• ,t,`, ,, • ' \ : ej, 7 - . ...•...41 _ .. , ., ...-........... a. I 7th. • `+. i'I I.,.0. ,:',".- . -- - •. A 1 k ...... i,, ,,,.........,14,,.t. , _ 1 1 Fill 1-..-,.., .;. .. -.), . . ,..„,....,...,. .....,., i: __ •• ?,.,c_..t:-..,,.,)b,e, -,•t., . .• • .4T: I J • I 1 .• 1 1 [Conceptual Master r Plan -e,•If7 7 I„t•,,-,3.*..A'...,.•,;,.l'\1'..‘,•c.1.,.• , I I 1 " P. oweitAve,._-.i. .,,A, •t $.,-. ..1 .'. • ...it, .„. ...-, .,.,, .„,,, BlackRiver 0 k,... It..,• . _. • ,, ./".I•- •I`:• •"' 'I I 'II( rt •Corporate Park• •,. •,..:0 ‘;',1111‘. ' ' ', , ,I li . ....... • . ..........,...., • VALLEY 405 • • . ... . • .i- i-ir,...,...c4., .›.,...ii :, • • , : . . . ..,. .,.._ RENTON, WASHINGTON • 88 .5,,,•ft,,,.. .. 1 ....„ .. • _____ 1-..1'1111 11 i fc., , „„. , . . , . I . .• .... It Ii I • • . ••,....,-._ ..,, !.a. ! I.,',.. it , %• . '------•.:1" i :. ,. r, ,......-.trnTLY EQUITIES I:.,j, II - : I,.•,I i.0.'4'.II' I kI,,, . , • j/FNi 11- '\ t• ;...„",.. • !.EASOti POMEROY NORTHWEST .1 .'\:.„.. % "\ . ' .. :::.;:.-::::...4';'.:,—• 1.f.,.. ' :"I ... ‘, . '"4•. ''-' ' '..: f '' ' Grady Way-i ."-CPPPP- . IA ., ., ,,,... 1. • ,....e-' ..14 ' ',•:..- ....7'''' • . • li; -4 :;•;••''''..' . •t.• • • ‘,...0.. `to‘•.'N 1i • 405 . _- .• ,• • _ .. ... ... , . • , . • , : - ... - -wrAin • .._. • . , r...... .... .. ,tly it {.7 , , . . .,. , . _ .. ____ _ _ •- .. ___:::-.Hog:n_log.H PA L-ge449 , ' •4,-,, / • ONES \. . \ !' .i, • 0 ' 1'4 / , ' /// VARIANCE v " ' / SITE /45LOCATION-+ ' • `'// eKINGCOUNT'( __ — -c • 1 C PUMP STATION N c • wY ( TO ®E ONSY. I • sum'AEA •$4. 4 ''y ' 1 4t I w .- z • I . /"k a LID3. 2 • vi h _ Q S Q �� METRO 0 J J 4 W = /o DISPOSAL 4 Y — .� ::K o I - 405 • t,,lY it• 3 / J • • fir, Vf CI N ITV MAP. ,,: . :;SC LE -! w ^ : •��. A .5� • lr' 00 • ^ 7u'r. n 3 .• kt 1n• '� L4 - ':1: t.,K.l. /r • t.S iv: ,F M1J 1^T>t �,f i.. tl iw =' ':�ii t,•tt moq S.i .` Y''rt PU f :1 -a � ' t'7 f _ J g:' •`'+ •.lI ':^ �r� rY '1 ":Y.,w�:_-'i1 '=C �"tt3 ' .{.r "is t5t; _",.Yih �.�� 1 ^�'•rx*s� ''i `-' :M f.- ,.� i^�:,-1+''''•; -�d: K . �.. 'J,;•,,^.t�SC�"�'C . "•ii, n. :.;n,t,• ..1:. ; e-,::< am-.b�J}> ' ' `.,. }. K.jt y:. ".:\" "` " ,tfi; .£+ .?..,_.Z, - t3 ;• Y�, �=: w,t>!. . . ue.',: {' `•v+i3'.:.°..c� ;+w:"n .�Z _ 1` w :4 tt":n T• .� lfir- n E•'" :^,9 T+ c, . . �Fyr.F„.M, �v. -4_•v:(.. 4:;y ' i.r�°' -adr . c:r,✓,Y:=r.� ,:+$f. . ,,A1asi•i , r t;: -00, - (*,L ,.y, _....,tdv', i re �� �.,�;,, " �4 'Y +��S:` ".1.::"r.'.a�.n.j�$. • %,N '4•ti '..' 27�.' ��k 4 f � 9S : s_.�'. s3 3rv2Ti n: .r1T:r. ��: _ •'Y: wt.. t '4.i- . 4... :eSs?, 1 ° • • • • 1 OF 2 EXHIBIT 1 TO AGREEMENT • • PARCEL A: THAT PORTION OF THE. SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION.13,. TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., IN KING• COUNTY, WASHINGTON; AND THAT PORTION OF 'JUNCTION ADDITION TO CITY OF SEATTLE, ACCORDING TO TH: 7 PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 12 OF PLATS , PAGE 75, IN KING COUNTY, 7 WASHINGTON, .TOGETHER WITH VACATED STREETS ADJOINING WHICH. WOULD ATTACI .TO SAID PREMISES BY OPERATION OF LAW, AND OF C. E. BROWNELL'S DONATIOI CLAIK ND. 41' AND OF THAT PORTION OF TRACT 26, RENTON SHORE LANDS 2ND SUPPLEMENTAL, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: • • BEGINNING AT THE SOUTH QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 13; THENCE NORT1 00°58'28" EAST. ALONG THE NORTH-SOUTH CENTERLINE OF SAID SECTION 13 A DISTANCE OF 884.84 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF TRACT 26 OF RENTON SHORELANDS SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL MAPS, 1958; THENCE SOUTH 72°37 '52" HEST ALONG THE SOUTH BOUNDARY OF SAID TRACT 26 A DISTANCE OF 382.60 FEET; THENCE NORTH 70°54102". WEST ALONG SAID SOUTH .BOUNDARY OF TRACT 26 A • DISTANCE, OF• 73.50 FEET TO THE EAST LINE OF THE CHARLES BROVNELL DONATION LAND CLAIM ND. 41 AND THE TRUE POINT OF• BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING NORTH 70°54 '02" WEST ALONG SAID SOUTH BOUNDARY OF TRACT 26 DISTANCE OF 281.02 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 73°56101" WEST ALONG SAID SOUTH BOUNDARY OF TRACT 26 A DISTANCE OF 130.08 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 41°16'07% WEST ALONG SAID SOUTH BOUNDARY OF TRACT 26 A DISTANCE OF 316.1B FEET T THE NORTH BOUNDARY OF A TRACT OF LAND DEEDED TO KING COUNTY AND DESCRIBED UNDER KING COUNTY AUDITOR'S FILE ND. 6607786; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG SAID NORTH BOUNDARY ON A CURVE TO THE LEFT, THE CENTER OF WHICH BEARS SOUTH 39°41'39" WEST HAVING A RADIUS OF 627.46 FEET AN • ARC DISTANCE OF 434.70 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 39°41'39"; . THENCE NORTH A DISTANCE OF 25.00 FEET ALONG SAID NORTH BOUNDARY; THENCE WEST A DISTANCE OF 280.69 FEET ALONG SAID NORTH BOUNDARY; THENCE SOUTH 59°53'47" WEST ALONG SAID NORTH BOUNDARY A DISTANCE OF 377.52 FEET; . THENCE SOUTH..74°13'19" _NEST• ALONG .SAID NORTH BOUNDARY A DISTANCE OF 443.31 FEET TO THE NORTHERLY MARGIN OF THE CHARLES MONSTER COUNTY ROAD; THENCE NORTH 34°18'31" WEST ALONG SAID NORTHERLY MARGIN A DISTANCE 'OF 43.46 FEET TO THE SOUTH LINE OF THE BURLINGTON NORTHERN RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY; THENCE ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT, ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE, THE CENTER OF WHICH BEARS . NORTH 06°34';1" WEST HAVING A RADIUS OF 696.00 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE; OF 45.43 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 03°44'25" TO A POINT OF COMPOUND CURVE; ,THENCE ALONG 4 CURVE TO THE LEFT, ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE, THE CENTER OF WHICH BEARS NORTH 10°19'06" WEST HAVING A RADIUS OF 19055.00 FEET, AK ARC DISTANCE OF 209.95 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 11°24' 08" TO .A POINT OF CDI POUNC CURVE; THENCE. ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT, ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE, THE CENTER OF WHICH BEARS NORTH 21°43114" WEST HAVING A RADIUS OF 727.0D FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 214.77 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 16°55'35" TO A POINT OF COMPOUND CURVE; THENCE ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT, ALONG. SAID SOUTH LINE, THE CENTER OF WHICH BEARS NORTH 38°38'49" • • • • RCITY OrF RENTON • ru , • P . JUN10186 • -' BUILDING/ZONING DEPT. Nt5T HAVIryG A RADIUS .,r 1.571.00 FEET, AN ARC UI+STANCE OF 206.57 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 07°32'O2" TO A POINT OF TANGENCY; THENCE NORTH 43°49 '09" EAST ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE A DISTANCE OF 97.17 FEET TO A MINE 35 FEET SOUTHERLY OF AND PARALLEL WITH THE CENTERLINE OF - THE EXISTING HOST SOUTHERLY TRACK OF THE CHICAGO, MILWAUKEE, ST. PAUL PA) • PACIFIC RAILROAD TRACKS; THENCE ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE ON A CURVE TO ' THE RIGHT, THE CENTER OF WHICH BEARS SOUTH 42°43' 18" EAST HAVING ,A RADIUS OF 696.89 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 40.09 FEET THROUGH A CETR{L ANGLE OF 03°17'45"; THENCE NORTH 50°34'27" EAST ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE A DISTANCE OF 248.50 FEET; THENCE ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE ON A CURVE TO THE RIGHT, THE CENTER OF WHICH BEARS SOUTH 39°25'33" EAST HAVING A RADIUS OF 676.58 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 93.64 FEET THR,DUGG A , • CENTAL ANGLE OF, 07°55'47" TO A POINT OF REVERSE CURVE; THENCE ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE ON A CURVE TO THE LEFT, THE CENTER OF WHICH BEARS NORTH 31°29 '46" WEST HAVING A RADIUS OF 428.64 FEET, AN ARC• DISTANCE OF 73.32 FEET THROUGH-A CENTRAL ANGLE OF. 09°48 '04" TD A POINT OF REVERSE `� CURVE; THENCE ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE ON A CURVE TO THE RIGHT, THE CENTER OF WHICH• BEARS SOUTH 41°17'50" EAST HAVING A RADIUS OF 2,580.74 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 437.40 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 09°42'39" TO A POINT OF COMPOUND CURVE; THENCE ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE ON :A CURVE TO THE RIGHT, THE CENTER OF WHICH BEARS SOUTH 31°35'11" EAST HAVING A RADIUS OF 2,790.19 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 789.44 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 16°1Z'39" TO THE EAST LINE OF THE CHART S BROWNELL- DONATION LAND. CLAIM NO. 41 ; THENCE SOUTH O1°24'04" WEST AL?�G SAID EAST LINE A DISTANCE OF 950.58 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF • • BEGINNING. • • • • • ' • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 1 OF 3 • EXHIBIT• 2 TO AGREEMENT . • • ...r...........•..�....... • • • • • • PARCEL B: • THAT PORTION OF Co E. BROWNELL'S DONATION CLAIM NO. 411 AND OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER AND THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, K.H.♦ IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTH QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 13; THENCE NORTH 00°58928" EAST ALONG THE NORTH—SOUTH CENTERLINE OF SAID SECTION 13 A DISTANCE OF 884.84 FEET. T O THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF TRACT 26 OF RENTON SHORELANDS SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL HAPS, 1958; THENCE SOUTH 72°37'52" WEST ALONG THE SOUTH BOUNDARY OF SAID TRACT 26 A DISTANCE OF 382.60 •FEET;••., • THENCE NORTH 70°54'02" WEST-ALONG SAID SOUTH BOUNDARY OF TRACT 26 A DISTANCE OF 73.50 FEET TO THE EAST LINE •OF THE CHARLES BROWNELL DONATION LAND CLAIM NO. 41; THENCE NORTH. 01°24'04" EAST ALONG SAID EAST LINE OF THE CHARLES BROWNELL DONATION LAND CLAIM NO. Al A OISTAxCE OF 950.58 FEET TO A LINE 35 FEET SOUTHERLY OF AND PARALLEL WITH THE CENTERLINE OF THE .EXISTING HOST SOUTHERLY TRACK OF THE CHICAGO, MILWAUKEE' ST. PAUL C PACIFIC RAILROAD TRACKS AND THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING+ THENCE WESTERLY ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE ON A CURVE TO THE LEFT, THE CENTER OF WHICH BEARS SOUTH 15°22'32" EAST HAVING• A RADIUS2F 2790.19 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 789.44 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLEDF • 16°12'39" TO A POINT OF COMPOUND CURVE;\ THENCE CONTINUING .ALONG SAID • • • • j'�CRT OF RENTON D ¢ @ Iri N V! - t JUN 101986 • BUILDING/ZONING DEPT. • 2 0F 3 PARALLEL LINE ON A CURVE TO THE LEFT, THE CENTER OF WHICH BEARS SOUTH 31°35'11" EAST HAVING A RADIUS OF 2580.74 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 437.40 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 09°42' 39" TO A POINT OF REVERSE •C'URVE; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE ON A CURVE TO THE RIGHT/ THE CENTER OF WHICH BEARS NORTH 41°17' 50" WEST HAVING A RADIUS OF 428.64 FEET/ AN ARC DISTANCE OF 73.32 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 09°48'04". TO A POINT OF REVERSE CURVE; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE ON A CURVE TO THE LEFT, THE CENTER OF WHICH BEARS 4OUTH 31°29 '46" EAST HAVING A RADIUS OF 676.58 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 93.6% FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 07°55'47" TO A• POINT OF TANGENCY;, • THENCE CONTINUING ALONG' SAID PARALLEL •LINE SOUTH. 50°34'27" WEST 4 DISTANCE OF Z48..50 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVE ; THENCE CONTINUING ALIONG SAID PARALLEL LINE ON A CURVE TO THE LEFT, THE CENTER OF WHICH BEARS . SOUTH 39°25 '33" EAST HAVING A RADIUS OF 696.89 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 07 40.09 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 03°17 '45" TO THE SOUTH LINE OF THE BURLINGTON NORTHERN RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY; THENCE NORTH 43°49'09" O EAST ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE A DISTANCE OF 173.83 FEET TO A POINT qF CURVE; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE ON A CURVE TO THE O RIGHT, THE CENTER OF WHICH BEARS SOUTH 46°10' 51" EAST HAVING A RADIUS OF 4030.00 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 197.57 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 02°48'32" TO A POINT OF COMPOUND CURVE; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID, SOUTH LINE ON A CURVE TO THE RIGHT, THE CENTER OF WHICH BEARS SOUTH 43°22'19" EAST HAVING A RADIUS OF 1853.00 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 194.75 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 06°01° 18" TO A POINT OF COMPOUND CURVE; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE ON A CURVE •TO THE RIGHT, THE CENTER OF WHICH BEARS SOUTH 37°21'O1" EAST. HAVING A RADIUS OF� 10543.00 FEET, AN .ARC DISTANCE OF 186.51 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL A GLE . OF 01°00'49" TO A POINT OF COMPOUND CURVE ; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE ON A CURVE TO THE RIGHT, THE CENTER OF WHICH BEARS SOUTH ' 36°20'12" EAST HAVING A RADIUS OF 1657.00 FEET AN ARC DISTANCE OF, 193.93 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF06°42' Z0" TO A POINT OF CO,'iPOUND CURVE; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE ON A CURVE TO THE RIGHT, THE CENTER OF WHICH BEARS SOUTH 29°37 '52" EAST HAVING A RADIUS OF 6738.00 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF Q197.76') FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL AN. LE OF O1°40'54" TO A POINT OF COMPOUND CURVE; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE ON A CURVE TO THE RIGHT, THE CENTER OF WHICH BEARS SOUTH 27°56'58" EAST HAVING A RADIUS OF 1768.00 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 194.45 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 06°18'06" TO A POINT OF COMPOUND CURVE; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE ON A CURVE TO THE RIGHT, THE CENTER OF WHICH BEARS SOUTH 21°38' 52" EAST HAVING. A RADIUS OF 8603.00 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 204.54 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF - 01°2i '44" TO A POINT OF COMPOUND CURVE; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE ON A CURVE TO THE RIGHT, THE CENTER OF WHICH BEARS SOUTH 20°17'08" EAST HAVING A RADIUS OF . 1922.10 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 1T8.79 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 05°19' 46" TO A POINT OF COMPOUND CURVE ON THE EAST LINE OF SAID CHARLES BROWNELL DONATION LAND CLASH NO. 414; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE ON A CURVE TO THE RIGHT, THE CENTER OF WHICH BEARS SOUTH 14°57 '22" EAST HAVING A RADIUS DF, 2814 .93 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 659.42 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 13°25 '19" TO A POINT OF COMPOUND CURVE; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE ON A CURVE TO THE RIGHT, THE CENTER OF WHICH BEARS SOU, N • • . . . • • •. • • • •• . • . • 01°32 '03" EAST HAVING A RADIUS OF 1165.09 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 1097.05 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 53°57 '.00" TO A POINT OF TANGENCY; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE SOUTH 37°35'03" EAS1 A DISTANCE OF 308.70 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVE; THENCE CONTINUING ALON SAID SOUTH LINE ON A CURVE TO THE LEFT, THE CENTER OF WHICH BEARS NORTH 52°24 '57" EAST HAVING A RADIUS OF 1005.37 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 45.82 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF O2°36'41" TO A LINE 35 FEET q SOUTHERLY OF AND PARALLEL WITH THE CENTERLINE OF THE EXISTING MOST SOUTHERLY TRACK OF THE CHICAGO, MILWAUKEE, ST. PAUL C PACIFIC RAILROAr' TRACKS; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE NORTH 40°11 '44" WEST ; DISTANCE OF 126 .24 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVE ; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE ON A CURVE TO THE LEFT, THE CENTER OF WHICH BEARS 0 SOUTH 49°48 ' 16" WEST HAVING A RADIUS OF 1829.78 FEET, AN' ARC DISTANCE ' . SOUTH 309.67 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 09°41 '48" ; THENCE NORTH • 49°53 '32" WEST ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE A DISTANCE OF 167.07 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVE; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE ON A CURVt;- TO THE LEFT, THE CENTER OF WHICH BEARS SOUTH 40°06' 28" WEST HAVING A RADIUS OF 1102.46 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 807.11 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 41°56'46" TO A POINT OF COMPOUND CURVE; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE ON A CURVE TO THE LEFT, THE CENTER • OF WHICH BEARS SOUTH 01°50' 18" EAST HAVING A RADIUS OF 2790.19 FEET, A ARC DISTANCE OF 659.24 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 13°32' lY' TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. 1 • • • • • • • • s ' • • • CITY OP RENTON � 11rel ./3 [I lcif] ; JUN 101986 • BUlL►DjNG/zONING DEPT° • • • j . • lof2 EXHIBIT 3 TO AGREEMENT c. V7 0 lI) PARCEL "C" • ' THAT PORTION OF TRACT 25, RENTON SHORELANDS SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL; AND THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 13, AND THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 13 IN TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST U.M., AND THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST W.M. IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: • BEGINNING AT THE SOUTH QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 13; THENCE NORTH 00°58'28" EAST ALONG THE NORTH-SOUTH CENTERLINE OF SAID SECTION • 13, A DISTANCE OF 884.84 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF TRACT 26 OF RENTON SHORELANDS SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL MAPS, 1958, AND THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 72°37'52" WEST ALONG THE SOUTH BOUNDARY OF SAID TRACT 26, A DISTANCE OF 382.60 FEET; THENCE NORTH 70°54'02" WEST ALONG THE SOUTH BOUNDARY OF SAID TRACT 26, A DISTANCE OF 73.51 FEET TO THE EAST LINE OF THE CHARLES BROWNELL DONATION LAND CLAIM NO. 41; THENCE NORTH 01°24'04" EAST ALONG SAID EAST LINE, A DISTANCE OF 950.58 FEET TO A LINE 35 FEET SOUTHERLY OF AND PARALLEL WITH THE CENTERLINE OF THE EXISTING MOST SOUTHERLY TRACK OF THE CHICAQO, MILWAUKEE, ST. PAUL AND PACIFIC RAILROAD TRACTS; THENCE ALONG SAID LINE 35 FEET SOUTHERLY OF AND PARALLEL WITH THE CENTERLINE OF THE MOST SOUTHERLY TRACK, ALONG A CURVE TO THE RIGHT, THE CENTER OF WHICH BEARS SOUTH 15°22'32" EAST, HAVING A RADIUS OF 2,790.19 FEET, AN ARC • • • • CITY OF RENTON ,.H •�. RJUNI 9 /198g" e i • BUJLDING/ZO IVG DEPT. �.: • • DISTANCE OF 659.24 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 13°32' 14" TO A POINT OF COMPOUND CURVE; THENCE ALONG A CURVE TO THE RIGHT, ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE, THE CENTER OF WHICH BEARS SOUTH 01°50' 18" EAST HAVING A RADIUS OF 1,102.46 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 807.11 FEET • . THROUGH A CENTRAL .ANGLE OF 41°56'46"; THENCE SOUTH 49°53'32" 7 • EAST, ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE, A DISTANCE OF 167.07 FEET; • THENCE ALONG A CURVE TO THE RIGHT, ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE, . . in HAVING A RADIUS OF 1,829.78 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 309.67 i I M FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 09°41 '48" ; THENCE ' t LEAVING SAID PARALLEL LINE, SOUTH 40°11 '44" EAST, A • DISTANCE OF .126.24 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTH LINE OF THE I 03 • BURLINGTON NORTHERN RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY; THENCE ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT, ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE, THE CENTER OF WHICH BEARS NORTH 49°48' 16" EAST HAVING A RADIUS OF 1,005.37 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 549,.02 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 31°17 '19" TO A POINT OF' TANGENT ON SAID SOUTH LINE OF THE BURLINGTON NORTHERN RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE, SOUTH 71°29'03". • EAST ALONG A LINE 50 FEET SOUTH OF AND PARALLEL WITH THE EXISTING SOUTHBOUND TRACK,-A DISTANCE OF 826. 56 FEET- TO THE - WEST LINE OF SAID SECTION 18; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG• SAID SOUTH LINE SOUTH 71°29 '03" EAST, A DISTANCE •OF 85.52 FEET TO 1 NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTH 650 FEET OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 18; THENCE NORTH 89°10'25" WEST .ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SOUTHWEST QUARTER • OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 18, A DISTANCE OF 81.57 FEET TO THE EAST LINE OF. .THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 13; THENCE NORTH 88°15 '00" WEST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF THE NORTH 650 FEET OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 13, A DISTANCE OF 2,261 .41 FEET TO AN ANGLE POINT ON THE SOUTH BOUNDARY OF TRACT 25 .OF RENTON SHORE LANDS, 1958; THENCE NORTH 33°07 '25" WEST ALONG SAID SOUTH BOUNDARY, A DISTANCE OF 154.51 FEET TO AN ANGLE POINT; THENCE NORTH 27°21'32" EAST ALONG SAID SOUTH BOUNDARY, A DISTANCE OF 387.32 FEET TO AN ANGLE POINT; THENCE NORTH. 83°17 '25" WEST ALONG SAID SOUP BOUNDARY, A DISTANCE OF-171.17 FEET;-THENCE - SOUTH 46°22 '22N-- WEST ALONG SAID SOUTH BOUNDARY, A DISTANCE, OF 324.66 FEET; - THENCE SOUTH '72°37'52" WEST ALONG SAID SOUTH BOUNDARY, A DISTANCE OF 76.33 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. • • • r • • • • • CITY OP RENTON r5) /" FM • IA GJ JUN 1 G 1986 BUILDING/ZONING DEPT. }rC-o+,4�:"r,`aS;:vip� • ,.tl r;:,✓'t'. - • - • _ _ t,yE^;,,.gip i ..,w.•Yti,y`y : t o S I t .c"•.;Y.. • - •-•',: <° I` ''r'"` r,^+ f 9! `\ 1. ''gaw•ru .,-S§K,- •;.15 •r. ,•En • `ti • • , ••., n;:_„•',-"w4'=r •'.r. ` ','Z '".f-'! �'„yn t,,( r, X, r t..:yri 5' ,!,,,_�' ..t' 'F., ..j ..f' 1{ ;, -!:1i'v ' ,,�;,'-'t a 7 ft'.�', f,'�`. �i9.. ' ii, 'J`stk'• :- "'S '".•`jl4'� t,:=1••t1 `•t�i,. r•",'( -i: • t'',L_,._,-f,` .•.i,:r• ;q,1„•>w ,,•,, -,:lki ati: yy.,1.F."�}� 11:i! aw. g� m4 +fg}` ',. [.` `.t i':`' yr., 7 • .J .,:' r' ' ,.' ;dC ....• �r':;;th. r 1< slat fx. }�p�' • • '` �'t a:,4aE ii :a .a •r. Se. • •._ - • _ �•i.;�'Tt� ,#At:.f' ,1}t:..;",�4'.3"y,F ;, + Ill • 4., .a"!7; '3'.a ru.w,•,e„ 'f, • - u:'(ti.,�,.r°' eg-:J. Sri SR 4'"e r7�','Lr,•, rI '44 �'Y.`,•+ iM,, �'�} 4, [ �elle:Ia'''''..1::vt: , .:,}E a'g"�, li�w!. irf$ 'f"4 1 pt�,.„N.4[�a aA! S ; • 5�-'->1a1.a,.ydp.1 - I`,,,'trim•})'-'1,I y [ ,4%44V•A��[i , $'� I.t $ rt I. •,, 1 !. r> d �. Xi< Irt a S P ';� ",),v '',n ?'« S� 't" '' {r - '- , V.a. ° , ,„a q..44 a• ert•,•1:-?f t4AFI'r }e ,:r }iY,. i, a: ':; ,' : i, a 'r 1 u :4..t"`- yx?t, d f ,f¢ftW- +V " ..r I , �r 4 ''�),L�p��, ri ' • J ? +12.� LS'' .n 9 �ii� r �tl�frCM�iMn� ''7� L °} kiFl.:: -d�/rt q: 'a, •• • • r- j, �ii Ulfir, :,.�''-e:` t r'X fr � 1 by , • ✓ • 41 'ftt X f:g'., • - t: • ! ••!'�r'1t.. • x' lYif�r:2-p'q,.=•X .4� .7,;.3t ,� + j "�%�4 '-.'-.t'., ''F{4d ,, �' ,.!','4•,'.i - •• • • ,, ';•U�'1F�•?.3�'i5 3.1,,,'N 19Pk..t. 'yati f' .4.-\• "o �ri'hlr'F} r, ' •• Viz,•. i ,ff. i`. ai,: .': e'„ 1, ,I i'' _ • n. ...t;f„r?i-°'e 4',p f'4.'['•i.;,.. a"' • j '...°, • -04 ,C A �Y • r• ,�. �� • ,.t •• • • '-,{r,:..�['�1`Y'�`ai XY:ki t74'.r/Jy: ,.q�['�y •,-,'� � 'te ".�f,Sf',r. „ti' • ,t ,r • ',w,-`;E'1ri".'.3 ,y','Wit,i' a` .�. i-' d,.>,r.• ;4,�,1e IrE� ���> 5• '.:ti,a.)g'3 Y•4�:�y.':S{£� a ,y q,{," a •i,rtt •,'`, • �%,�y, F^ spy •^A��.:':., ,o4...r+43, 4a-A4: .r° !"fie* £y��?,,-:-.`' 3C�,. 5�''1*ii=r4,��!A'Y `•,. r/4 , ' • ' 'TR A''lFr+IC-=6I1�1'�P/'�`I ta'�tNA& ,s��.. Y 3,:- 1'.. . y, d :. ,as to 4 t :r—n.:,—a,R- ^TM • ..... , r. }t• [,p.'.:aµte,f.k i,"rf i'q '} 1 ! _ �a rt ' + t N 1�,- • `: >.:•;FOR'",ti 'rfsii bw f y`iAc _• .k fF� -�• S '''•• ',•;;,, • , .. '",�,''1 :.c. ;1'z•- 4, tl ai � ,t� # a r. a'$ 3.�Yr (--- .r..,-.,n"�,t' 1 _" +r..'✓;a�:idn^�,'•;:'(^'rF'"94 .f�} ,'n,,"yp' 'k .' } i i 3 ii'tr 46*a., 7.,.:, X k,a --..-_..d : 'r t= • f2.,-i• „' ,'..6.,F..c•G�,_ ``4'iji,: .:2 1,,'t-..wit„,:-,.,„.,, ..wi t„a'.t `I"'F�.-''R t4,f- :v, *`y .'r, 11 t !'„ 'F 11''r ;;y' ;} fty >a'' `t �,/}`:1,r :.'�';�,";iA:,,=%9'^` i!�,' J'` rf 5," ' d X' 1;.n �rs ' • L..• ,. , 1 , ,_[' 4fr�"`V 6 V1a t, r ..r1 7. r�g.48 , ^tr'; ,i...•i 71,,f.,;••,4:,:=,,R".1-' .7',1, .. ;r� '' I` i>t6 n:` =, f;fi:., '4'i;;c.,:,Y344 8▪ 't�y }. t. , r "'i :eff'+.�, '; "6 Y', ;.1... , dr.b9,,,,P:'c - '�,:.,a� y ?Wr�w�,k`wa ' • • .k {� �'"� ! uH, V ipl .• �, '.•4.. t d r.af•��'s .�a; .� ,a a• 't;';::',3..,. ,Y,.f.'; •� _ 7;.r•* "Y�f{3-,. .",l' `„�;-,$i ;t{' raP Y,r •,r.�� a;. d, , ,•r' ,}r ./„t.,s�'_�:`,;,,a F ,ri .f /"y a' ,,,"'e-''� - .› 44.., ;},l£_" !t1'^'sro:-4`: ,`7» - 1 fr t xr:i.!.,,.x hY4!ctk...rk}V.{t, 1..?Ff k�jp �y,, ,¢ kY }'Y, • r. ?`- 3r gg,�,,x , F"krhx.,°A6Z`tt;'1e,' ..:..:.,•' ,;"V5:<Vk.rf-}� �p .,r t., y ..k, .,. ,�, r.A��.�3 yr,+-r- ";t,;:i'r 'r+ '9> .i:';}: °` ',�7r•Y'X' ti, 'k, >c . 4.'� `vr` e, 1 f i.e >a� '� rr '4. �i A: .C ,1' Y i�;: rq x "s, ,;7 ( �r,I .�"., tf .Yr- tt ,�'R, e�r7�1. 2,�" Yn ^C Y ry 'i'' a �A a„ •r' r 1;r a ,a.i::tiYk ^ s:` i:'i ,+5 .F - t• 'A a • :Jr+- - F 1,`!+ %' ` _ yA,,�'=C.•.<+.n i., F I, ,h d.[ rr „�', ;)-yt r ff�� :•vi, Y :L„e'x ":p, fir: til y hf i -;5: til, :i; '(e �E� - rh'•, r1' - i S-auJ:';,�1" 4 nj• 4 �� 'f, ;'ri' �ii rr. .4i�r .vti.s;: s o. , s+ �f. .t �' 1`I' N Ex, } _ _ "1 `�:aif 7,Y JL " t F -'tu w„Rc _ �} .�3 Y i 3 �d [:i. ��FF '.f. 'J`. -�a .•P .4 ,n d'� "tea ▪ `=r �1, '1 I S,� r•E� a ' 1r, sr' ',a^ 11,. ^a 4''a d„' v� J • x 4P� ' r �' r ▪ - z. s ar•" 4 •��t ter.,,3•b� '1 r f5 - 3 1' } A ▪ i S. .is 'a,= r, ait, wr i[ �'4' y �'7.', r-+ .r „�S• �4 r ,i. ,t t•. �+ r �t• C'S�'�� P. ,elt ,6' 3 ,Fr•4 Y Y ![• lY< !r Pkr t„ ism1yy l f•%�4' , q,- ▪: y' '� x i w a f" - I za_ ,N, { eJ� �3r' r m+ �L 'rr Y e • al' �' srf-^' •• • • 9 y • 1 f[r� j, !L. '7` ��, Y 4 k a. . . 1 t^ r ' ,,•. '`Y r :t:i.:,'+.'.�..';"^,'Ye„r,.ni:';'1.<,ra't1 ;i.� X" ▪ i` tR :y,;s.}•1r�,4: '�/� - `'f`' '�`* :4.�.�;a's .�F L'#-[.{ '�fj4� q±•'y ., •-i r%...:•e Mans t�, d •Ct Y.1 � 'p�, ' C'At • ;+ • - %r r,. ,�` • a S: sl+ 4`„'r 1' L.` Y ^'A - f r ':e1. ti,s,Y ,fir, ,�' y � r 1F ''a.. } ;�r _ �r1U y��,,99�y .r i'i Nr ''S"`s MM�a{{'yy `y°�.^C5 '4X' I` 0,: gew „dY4,. r' :A, ie • r•;A rt g+.▪.^i r _a'Y • = e .i� r4 �i `'a • rt .� S�'' • a e '{ '!1 ( - ,iR 'F'' , :F. s ark^4. ,: '.i•w: .1 1.Yt�' � 9Ci:; F�' , '�F. 5^' t- r':4 +'4t i�tr.,. • '�tn• rP • C 'Y'. :.5.• .�, _..:t • '• „teJ."krYr P '}.r�,•'l°,fFY-"-'t"t"°' ':'4%;y f�.. • • • t �t.�.�t"s�waG•,+, a^, • t' S- • • !¢^ :ry ,.�.,a f�., ,ft3 +,S •X...f.r ,>a"•4-�'` _ ..'•,`;j:s"^},::,.,,a .;,?�'a c' r..�1+'a;. �`}+' ks�r,�,7,�: •zt44,.-,y .,i,! - r.J.•.r, o.f �d`k'ii.P 'k 3. S •ir•';+a�, .ct: _ - �,�.t it°rN ta,''w' ':t'„[M,r,�`Sgil�.3 ..:C>.y;'ror tt i rtea� ,,• ,�[�� S• i' F:, �' .:iic' ...E�s Ag99 :5" - I- 'iL ,l' -, y1, �y .a,.e�- r<6_ ',jj ,. _ f _ • {� , T..-F,LI*Fa:NF ,';'F..Y': :,l> •) •:•i .k' • ,r, G9 8`Pnt$C,:a-'4�a �i,iYa• '' ^r T''s i,y,, T F':, of r ^`i J« t Y� 4 a�k., Y r'c ti • f'=. ,l' h�'r i r r>ti l rQ: 4' �p �'k,a�. ^°3,. +`.`t'.ri•'•�'' - _ , • -�'a�.vt'r�'r�1a,� .®��il.Q� p�,,.Ia ®-,,t'e�!6 `� �i� p`pj•f. L", a51,;y .., , de' ,t©(•.,-;:t 1,- 6t1:►/� ( . '.I ra;,- y�' • ., • t:r•r:�w:.Y•,• r;fir"."T:-%k`.� 'rC�',..d�� IiFd"' !rl'' °'fi. .�i,,. if-, ,.I,' • _ ,"i:• .+ '.y"cfa-4,tr: ,.%- 'e ''''T,4 ' ti� •=i`' ��'-r h .1, .i4 S. J,�r � wi'i . :.9 , ra t:, " ,- ^, ,r ,--;,. J,-...; 4,.,z:,,,,i ,y its,„„ ri t [• t a., • vv F : T A ,:,I, t=•. _ -r rr 'rr' •`,,r.;,',," ,tr }it r z ,,f 5�4 Y 1'k...i,• `y !'.'. c '<� dM t } :\` "i'e^r''i +` ,• 'a' t °j•f 3t. az - } X. '`; t 4,1[`m rr " 1V .,.. ., • Y. . t• a.T^ r' ` , , t; i. ,,,*.',, , ,, _ , , .;. , ,.,. ,. ... . .,„:,, , ,, . . . I ,? `r,,�tryfr, ,Y;„-,Y { Jq 'J 4 _i ar' ,e_ ",,'-. ,,, slr Xi f. w" � , Vk�.'.:, :hti}, -t 81t`n.y�C,:�> �' � 1.*�'-'a'A �.�cst a u.,Nt,,4*� , .' r , '''•:,'J,,'�' >• t •,:y.''it;:.Rri::`;'v;�•4a:`k'3 ;p'r Y �ry�a �„�} �"t^,''r ,t,.�. , ,t , �; a, The;"T a ,'w�; t,•8 t +r a t,. '-y - ,R,A N 5 > ::3; i i �llL.! ,', ti, #„`,W,, , .•,r �,,•=i a • C.1-,41-' , ,t • • • • 1 , •.1•'• 1i' ',: , ':"�,' ['4•.i s.1'�`'�" T•. .' °'+.�i�<-(w • h • �ax d'. E pq M1t, r•.a�i'3. t� t Scy,' , •i•'4,'P,•'d �3i�.� f„f11! $° 'r l , 'i; 4 fi'Y • yy`�,,R�,''"�� ,a` 'q;q� 'F. - {, _ • r F ,f•.•Yi`'- 3.4i �_.gp y�r TM,itf.gp';t}°iF-•4.:; a St ,et tr ,,t.,.t'✓� `✓'aq k ;'+f V`di It, • ( •i,^44 P°' .t'•-• fy-;'..,—.,„ "-A","-,.‘ ., I,' `, , 3,'.lt eci�4�- 019r.,'":t,V, v'\''' ," - .tia 1.- )-444-.. a',E1 . �� ,,g µ.. i� ''' �� }.(Q 1 T 1 y' c�r .r - ' • :S .'t_'�$,�d..,Fy'7.>�rl:,^� i r �k b!'e,�''Wtt�`4t�' x1°+ y )' ;1 n't+a ,, `i if;'`>;., ,a .: 'fir:'`r } °' ,fir.; aGy,.tia 3 t '..5�,r..{' z�4 � fi ' t�+ ! ':l ,. ts. ltTgtar e 1h FY". ( yr,�".` r:'1 ,`. ..f:�'.• 't, • ,z z,�, ,S'::'� , y Sa;i���,,A�,::• �•. `,�f,-, �?.iy, :�iL�`ti !ir baY_ r ".iRro°`T ". $,P,, t,1Sa,q,'.t i'e +q'� ,,) • . ^ �'k, X'•' E� vi.µ•o- 4F''I�IPt,�9.Q .'�� "'l' Y.5 •/ :4 . xt Ax�' '�''�. ''.; /;�`j}y 1';' 'J' 1✓ .t., ,tl ,�,,: ,:},.,t .}`d r.5r��76s,V,�j, ;a►.V' � CaX ' 'tiE4"ar`i.'•y'+�.lfi. , ,i.`fai` .'4': ,w; 1• .h'• r 'i:N,, ely,.i[r?*'tn.•1. 1.,I: } {^'.,yFi f. �,k>ti � ''' , ,%}r ,r' .;R"F ,t�R.'a .a.f.,- aY . •;�.^y " '� t`�;V"���r}'7e ".,,;I ,#t.LE .rti:' '.Li ai::• i): I. :, ( r,a. :f'j y..,.'^Ysr� Y5'ti, ('f F'IL+, ••`!r' •:!•'>r :);j 14 i-y r+,,f%$' I y{ a;e5`d��i4''ef $�4"{ .=t' �1$"}'}-' §^Y'[..=f}`T' „ �"M1E�• ..�:. ,�. ��I t • '4. +:}� 'I iA' ,{..,l'c :1/P r•Et.td'�C.,,k �'• -4 'rMI�H� k14. [�,."�'i"' 7.'''4"� 4#a a4 x•t ?7.e`:,=f�54• .,•'r` ' • t • = i •�• • I `,;•• }' .x.,r7 ;"•^, "3 ' �$ d1'„c;' * .'y,} rk •f'{r t��' ! '.n, '' r ,r . . 4.,",�' ♦ F �irtL a»�Y. '� ],t4{t y ` .a;;�tia 'r i;rj, ".;t€f,,r�,}' fi i[ ,,:e4 '} ,,, ..rti•ts'7``'3" (Y7„,=4,•1 i= " ,'}' • • - 'v'r Il..�=?4`;�'«ir,> 6_[:fal. ;t>14 r> �:'YttII'��`,,'',Et r'`,�>'V'tc, d * "e «7''>�i�''«,ti'• ,a _ . ..1"gr N L .+Y,�i;: 'X >l ,''b t'Agt. ;y'. "t'd., Y 51,,.Mr..n. .` i., t, 'ta•:;'' J lr ;1�, '.r(. ._+,. tk;" 4 '� �i .I �- ,, ;�S .r I;c 4' •.d'i,, .i.',':T'a: ', ,x.., +ar ,\,ry, '•C r:.., :c 2:F, ,t' ,.1`. r. ti'' ,a,, 'r `5 >:y "a ,�r� t �� ..7kr J.; rJ t .''r,t* �t' 'r.,' ,., .1;': 1�,l P, r -row dl<,- 2'. 8€ ;'':i `,":}ft i" 7 „"r,� ftk r:;'5"t:,;: • - 'i" �'`rµ`�. ,.,,` ':d.e','d��"' s#,,,,pk.;4ja� �„i '�(y�y+��� � +�� •+� � :^r�'S'sY k �, r,• ', : .di�x ;t.;3, a9z+...F.,zr ;� l,.y:°, x, t�`+�,�rid � t ,,.«.,.,1 , L,,c.._� ...y I`G:,r..es.:,' ..o,.>.......�..... .•. ,. . mow.... .. - - ,..., . ..,"st".S1-,.,r'.,....e :A,' �� �a�!';.r<,..�'.Jt,,,: Traffic Impact Analysis l For BLACK RIVER TECHNOLOGY PARK June 1986 Prepared for: First City Development Corporation Prepared by: The TRANSPO Group, Inc. 14715 Bel-Red Road, Suite 100 Bellevue, Washington 98007-3940 L L CITY 0P R NTON ,pi@B \\fi JUN 101996 BUILDING/ZONING DEPT. 4 I :1•• . . 1„. • ,. • [ TABLE OF CONTENTS ~ - Page 1 INTRODUCTION 1 Project Description 1 Report Organization 4 EXISTING CONDITIONS 4 Street and Roadway Conditions 4 Traffic Volumes and Levels of Service 7 Transit Service - 9 Planned Improvements 11 FUTURE CONDITIONS 14 Future Non-Project Traffic 14 Project Traffic 17 • • Trip Generation 17 Total Traffic with Project 22 MITIGATION 24 Transportation Management Plan 24 Transportation Network Improvements 25 SUMMARY ' 27 ' LIST OF FIGURES 1. Vicinity Map 2 2. Site Plan 3 3. Street and Roadway Characteristics 5 4. 1986 Traffic Volumes : 8 5. Reconfiguration of Southcenter/Grady/I-405/Interurban 13 6. Estimated 1995 Traffic Volumes Without Project- 15 7. Project Trip Distribution 20 8. Project Traffic Assignment: 1995 21 9. Estimated 1995 Traffic Volumes With Project 23 ., _ LIST OF TABLES 1. Existing PM Peak Levels of Service ' 10 2. Future Non-Project PM Peak Levels of Service 16 3. Project Trip Generation .. . . . .... . .... .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .,. . . • . • • •• • -18 il4. 1995 PM Peak _Levels of Service 22 L ' i . j�2F._�,�x`.,+� cj. _ - ,,.- . ,. _ -. . ..ry >,a. a ,h.x..;t:.a3C,t. ±�.'%.yc.a`*aS,u..,o-,:.., .__ _ _ ,'.r:'.',.;' 'h"Ty'i.•".°.-,_�.` INTRODUCTION This report is an analysis of traffic impacts related to the development ll of the Black River Technology Park in Renton. An Environmental Impact State- ment (EIS) was published in 1982 in which the Black River project was only vaguely identified as an office park with rail-served warehousing and the transportation impacts briefly described in terms of a range of 9,070 to 34,030 vehicle trips per day. The project has since been defined as a tech- nology park with office and research and development facilities on-site. Full development of Black River is expected to occur by 1995, and this traffic analysis focuses on 1995 for comparison between project and non-project condi- tions. Project Description The Black River Technology Park is a development proposed .by First City Development Corp. It consists of a mixture of office space and research and development (R&D) facilities. The Tech Park is planned to develop from 1987 to 1995 as buildings are constructed generally from east to west over the project site, which is located in Renton adjacent to two recent developments on the Earlington Golf Course: the Valley 405 Business Park and the Washing- ton Technical Center. Figure 1 is a vicinity map showing the project location within the Renton area and Figure 2 shows the Black River project. site along with building size, function, and estimated completion. Major access to Black River is provided by Naches Avenue SW, a 5-lane roadway from SW 7th to Build- ing 25, and a 2-4 lane roadway continuing north, then west to' 0.akesdale/Monster • Road. L_ • L . -1- rb. Qe: .-.., y , ., j'-''.1-•,. - • -'•• . , -..... ..... ..... ...... ..-......., ......... ..... . I -'41,- - .............. . .1 _ gMMINENEII=NIND ,........ . MNIM. 1 mminommmeam. \ZOO, . . - . 1 - • • 1 I ie... ..... ..... • :', • NORTH --- ) ____ gPN10Nos LYNN. : • . . WOOD ..:, .-.-.. m...... • . --..... . - . .:, • . . L C . . • • . . = , • .Sf 1• POULSB0 Se . .... 2 zi-• 1,..•••• • ' :-..,,... .Z.Z.,.. ..• .. OM . ,Mna . ch a, . . — . . = _ .----. • . .... .. 4:: 1M11 • Maar ° • 4- . • •—w 1 ,•-•1 . • -- . . I-4 t _ . E7LEvu .... . B . . • . ..--. ...=. - • - . _ =NM. WOO = . . . ...:• ;. 41111 I • ..— ,.....—, _ ...., = aorse..-...,--... ...... , . 2 .. ——-- 7 • . M 0111•01.11111 MEM. .1•11, -_ ,./ ' I = 7••L IMMINIIMP MIID T = . • , ,r— , E SR • -----"-"'". . .. _ .m... __-=-----._ •••-- --- .......... -. , ---. --.. . . . -.-....-. 520 ..... SEATTLE - • ........ . 46,L3R:LERTON ...1 in 1 — - — . •. •-• • , - . — =-...-low' 'IP • — — . • 7,, •7_,:........ 7 . . . • 90 . • 'm . ....=. rz . -- ISBAQuAti . .1^ • . 44111% I • . •. • . _ . _ . RENT.N • • • . . • • . . , . . . , PROJECT . . . . - SITE . . ip . 1 • . . .. • • .-, v) , . BLACK RIVER • "4 1 . . TECHNOLOGY .._. i=1 _. rr 0) PARK . . •1 Figure 1 . J VICINITY MAP . • • • • .MO . , . _ . . • *1,14. • . • • I . �-r 34�,�S 31 C'�, NORTH - � -‘\r_. \. . ��'P 41 351J 32 30 , •� �/ s"` 33� 7 26 2 �pC 69F1 9 1 `` SIE0JECT a 28 Lita 25 /; r••• 36 i t �, +// • o • �[( , O_ SW 7THy AVE R. y,Q AKSDALE AVE SW .. . • 1 N • ., w BLDG.° ,FLOORS TYPE S.F. Q J . 24 1 STORY R/D 20.500 J 111 25 3/1 STORIES OFFICE G R/D 140.000 26 1 STORY R/D 26.650 o {1 d 27 3 STORIES OFFICE ' 31,500 74 • 28 4 STORIES OFFICE 51,5007cJ1 - 29 3 STORIES OFFICE 35,700 0 30 3 STORIES OFFICE 43,050 f- R {31 2 STORIES OFFICE 42,500 Cn , 32 3 STORIES OFFICE 48;350 7G-; T. - 33- 3 STORIES . . - OFFICE 48.350 m 34 2 STORIES OFFICE 42.500 - 35 2 STORIES OFFICE G R/D 62.800 g , 36 3 STORIES OFFICE 107.600 _;� Pam( ' V1 �y _- I-405 IONMMIOSMOMMN • BLACK RIVER - Figure 2 1f TECHNOLOGY SITE PLAN ' - IF • • PARK Gr-ovF Report Organization - il . The report begins with a description of the existing transportation system: streets and intersections, traffic volumes, peak hour congestion, and transit service. This will be a summary of information gathered from field visits and lirecent traffic analyses of adjacent developments. Existing conditions are presented as the basis for estimating future 11 traffic conditions along with planned improvements to vicinity roadways and intersections. Non-project traffic volumes are forecasted for 1995 and 11 summarized, along with levels of service. - Project traffic at full development is estimated for 1995 for daily and PM 11 peak hour periods. Project traffic is then superimposed on non-project traffic for 1995 for an analysis of future conditions with Black River, based on total traffic volumes. The impacts of the project are identified through comparison `' between non-project and total traffic conditions. The report concludes with discussion of possible mitigating measures ',"? designed to improve conditions in the study vicinity to acceptable levels. ilEXISTING CONDITIONS li The Black River Technology Park is located in a growth area of Renton near the west city limit. Streets and intersections in the project study area 11 currently experience peak period congestion and the City of Renton is studying ways to improve traffic flow through the city and through the project study area. ii . A summary of study area existing conditions follows which includes street and roadway conditions, traffic volumes, peak hour intersection levels of 11 service, transit service and planned improvements. Documentation of existing conditions provides a basis for future year conditions and for an assessment of relative impact due to the project development. • ilStreet and Roadway Conditions Figure 3 defines the boundary within which project-related impacts will be 11 considered. Beyond the area shown, project traffic is well dispersed . , -4- , •I Q-- r 1 1 i I I I ) ---i -�' `:' . 44., 4e'.2' MEDIAN Z A 6-e' �'�ILDER SS i�H 2L, 40-44' e 191 ND I NG AND So S I DEMALKS Qa: ^ et.. 60-70' NORTH HILLY DO GOOD ec ;•w 11 ALIGt. NT C 21.. 22' 4L° 48' is POOR- -• PROJSCT SIDEWALKS cc.. S. 3rd St. FAIR SITS GOOD-EXC. i� , NARROW BRIDGE • m \d8. !�S•TOTI 20�LIMIT N� �/� F !/ .u.-�� Sun8.t 1, (1 Si, 60° POOR '�' //i/S Rd 'W ,/-i// s SIDEWALKS IP �� gGh j%/ �l /� 4L. 44-4e 35 PPH �f,;/% /�j �' -% ; 5S IOE'MP►+ALKS °o. t• GOOD �� ;/ ►�h��j/�:'< FAIR-GOOD °.0 . J SW 7th" St. 01 o •T. i" a •�, H ` ® 0 3 0 07 . P&R '' •-6L • 4 2L. 20-22' 45 N C • 9. qr . �t 6°t SIDEWALKS 0 0-2' DIRT SHLD. \ E . 61 : ' 35 __VERY POOR CE /3\ N t,C, DOER. 0 '. < 13Zh 5l •a GOOD 9 • 0 DESIGN i o ♦7-8X O 4-5L. 4e-60° 0ao >I t --` b ND SIDEWALKS g © 20-22' `6O c:, 40 �►, eRtoc / `':1'- GOOD c7i NARROW 8RIDGE,. Y 20-22' t GRADY) ` I ... `�� k FREEWAY �� I SW. 16th S1. , /att� 4-WAY 2L. 2 2' S' '• . O to STOP I 0-2' SST SHLD. 0429C • • d 2L. 20-22' - FAIR 7 Onr�P • :) GRAVEL S4 0. . 25 KPH OPERATES AS A - G '405 FOUR-MAY-STOP Q t +.158th '.` -�Rr PC a. j4L FREEWAY 0 I ' GRADY WAY WEST OF LIND• q a 4L, 44-48' a 2L. 20-22' _ W mac LEGEND ao so ItD ? rt o-a' sos. 1 4i. 4e'. FED I AN 0 ..'.� 35 Fp I GRADY WAY. LINO TO RAINIER -W 6-e' PAVED SHLD. SIGNAL GOO FAIR-POOR 4-6L. 60-70♦. _ ' W SS 1414.: g • • I J- STOP SIGN N FAIR- KS FAIR-GOOD 2L 2 LANESD ; o � 3L. 36-40' N . • SHLD SI o.LDER - m SCM£ SIDEWALKS 1 35 MPH m I ' • GOOD-EXC. BLACK RIVER Figure 3 150 TECHNOLOGY STREET AND ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS G �.� • ! PARK r' r - i [. throughout the regional travel network. Figure 3 also illustrates pertinent characteristics of the streets and highways serving the project site. The major facility through the study area is Interstate 405 (I-405) which is a four-lane freeway which runs from Tukwila at Interstate 5 (I-5), just west of the project area, north to Lynnwood at I-5 in Snohomish County. I-405 provides a north-south connection to the growing suburban communities east of Lake Washington and Seattle, and also is a direct connection west to Tukwila and I-5, which is the primary north-south freeway in the Puget Sound region. Within the study area, access to I-405 is limited to two locations: a full cloverleaf interchange at Rainier Avenue (also known as SR 167) and 'a hybrid cloverleaf/diamond interchange at Interurban Avenue (SR 181) . As shown in Figure 3, I-405 runs approximately east-west south of the project site. 1 East of the project, Rainier Avenue, north of I-405, is a five to six-lane primary arterial in Renton which also continues north through commercial and residential districts to Seattle. South of 1-405, SR 167, or the Valley Freeway, is a controlled-access freeway leading to Kent, Auburn and Puyallup. West of the project site, additional north-south capacity is provided by Interurban Avenue/West Valley Highway (SR 181) . This four to five-lane facil- ity generally parallels the East Valley Freeway/Rainier Avenue, and offers alternate access to Seattle, Kent, Auburn and Puyallup. Sunset Highway, SR 900 (alternately known as Empire Way S in King County) is located north of the site and provides a third arterial connection between , Renton and Seattle. Access to Sunset from Black River is possible via SW 7th and either Rainier' Avenue or Edwards/Hardie Road and via an indirect connec- tion to Monster Road and 68th Avenue S. The proposed construction of 0akesdale Avenue from Grady Way to Monster Road (scheduled for mid-1987) will provide an improved connection from SW 7th to Sunset. Monster Road is a two-lane roadway of low-type design which provides access from SW 16th Street under I-405 and Grady Way to Metro's Renton waste treatment plant and to Container Corporation facilities in Renton. Heading north, Monster Road becomes 68th Avenue S, which ends at Sunset Highway (SR 900) at a stop-controlled T.-intersection. The roadway is hilly and windy with little or no shoulder area, limited sight distance at times, two at-grade railroad crossings and substantial truck traffic. Within a quarter-mile of the proposed junction of Monster Road with 0akesdale Avenue, a narrow two-lane bridge has a weight restriction of 15 tons. Repairs or replacement of this -6- • bridge are identified by Renton Public Works staff as necessary, but the schedule is uncertain. Improvements to this corridor from 0akesdale north would necessarily include bridge repair, at a minimum, if not replacement, in addition to improved signing or signalization of the railroad crossings. South of the project site, Grady Way provides an important east-west connection between Renton and Tukwila. East of Lind Avenue, Grady has four or more travel lanes. Between Lind and its terminus at Interurban Avenue, Grady is a narrow, two-lane highway in generally poor condition (see later section on Planned Improvements) . Within the immediate project vicinity, SW 7th and 10th Streets and Powell and Lind Avenues SW are the most important facilities. These are the streets that move traffic from the developing office/industrial project area to the regional facilities. All have benefited from recent developer-sponsored improvements, and are in good to excellent condition. Lind Avenue extends south of I-405 to SW 43rd Street. Figure 3 also illustrates intersection control in the vicinity. Intersec- tions on SW 7th and 10th Streets in the immediate vicinity of the site are STOP controlled, with the thru movement granted to the higher volume facility. Intersections on Grady Way and Rainier Avenue are signalized. Traffic Volumes and Levels of Service Project area traffic volumes for 1986 are noted in Figure 4. These volumes are based on data collected in 1985 by TRANSPO and City of Renton staff (as referenced in the Valley 405 Business Park traffic analysis by TRANSPO), and reflect estimated growth over the past year. Traffic generated by recent developments in the immediate vicinity has been incorporated in these esti- mates of 1986 conditions. Several buildings of the Washington Technical Center campus are complete and leased in addition to three buildings of the Valley 405 Business Park. Daily volumes in the vicinity range from 76,600 vehicles per day (vpd) on the Valley Freeway to 4,700 vpd on Powell Avenue SW just north of Grady Way. In the immediate project vicinity, volumes on Grady Way vary between 12,500 and 16,200 vpd. Farther to the west, Grady carries over 20,000 vpd, a very heavy volume for this two-lane facility. On SW 7th Street, daily volumes approximately double from 7,300 vpd near the site to 14,400 vpd near Rainier -7- al } • _ A . 3u z rider r1/7hWe 23,8 2.30 t 33,500 • Y "SR 800 ®.co 800 c ao S. 3rd St. 17,100 PROJECT 1.695 SITE \ is i e6. t.3" • 7 24.700 • COO ' //,,,_,. ,, suns 8,900 2,450 // • f.. vq 9 3.200 S• /�/ e® A• /� 7,300 14.400 cy 13,900 7� //i��/e��G//���� ���� �j 730 1.440 e4© 1.380 11,010 • e. 4i/ i SW 7th St. 40 30,700 -2.950 ^Q ` ��v / O U N 7,000 ��� • t0 700 79 500 0; 1s a950 . E y ® a N ® CO- 28.800 • .e p i to < 0 32.600 - 2.560 o �,O 2I o St a 3,230 39.300 47,900 Nao� Qb •I c < 3.900 4.740 p y 17,200 , / o. 0 14.700`_ c 1.700 0 • 24.100 i I 470 6.200 -I 1 2.390 b 1 � 2.080 `. '- I SW. 18th St. 76,600 C 0, I 7,590 0 0 13,200 Soo �, Y • 1 1.300 • Itieenre' 6W •, o < I s°. . '� I 12.500_ tt -605 S.158th St. I 1,240 0 I5.7006-- , 17.500 4. I 1,560 M + 1,730 s ' 'c 28.840 I W • LEGEND 2 2.860 - 1 - -' -p - o s 17,000 AVERAGE WEEKDAY VOLUME *co 1.700 PM PEAK VOLUME .4 co t • SOURCES, U) • CITY OF RENTON 9 WSDOT THETRANSPO GROUP ' ` CO .I - BLACK RIVER Figure.4 TECHNOLOGY jlI 1986 TRAFFIC VOLUMES ��e,e' PARK Crt(.e r • • [- Avenue. Volumes during the PM peak hour average about 10 percent of total daily volumes. These peak hour traffic volumes form the basis of level of service (LOS) analysis for intersection in the project vicinity. The analysis also takes into account intersection geometry, lane configuration, signal/STOP control , truck and buspresence in the traffic stream, pedestrian volumes at the. inter- section, and the relative evenness of demand throughout the hour. Levels of service are designated with letters ranging from A to F. LOS A indicates excellent operating conditions with essentially all vehicle queues clearing on each signal phase. LOS F indicates extreme congestion and that the number of vehicles entering the intersections exceeds the theoretical capacity. For signalized intersections, calculations have been made in accordance with critical movement summation techniques presented in Interim Materials on Highway Capacity (Transportation Research Circular 212, January 1980). In this case, the total volume of entering vehicles (V) is compared to the theo- retical intersection capacity (C); the resulting V/C ratio is then related to- a level of service. STOP-controlled intersections have been analyzed in accordance with techniques in the 1985 Highway Capacity Manual (Transportation Research Board Special Report 209) . A "reserve capacity" (i .e., unused oppor- tunity) for each movement is related to level of service. Table 1 describes existing (1986) levels of service at intersections within the project impact area. The intersections of Rainier & Grady and Interurban & Grady are acknowledged problem areas. As can be seen on preceding figures, vehicles traveling to I-405 from the project vicinity must pass through one of these two intersec- i tions. The only alternative access to I-405 is circuitous, and would require travel eastwards on South 3rd or northwards on Rainier to the north Renton interchange. Other intersections noted above are operating at levels con- sidered satisfactory under urban peak hour conditions. Transit Service . • The project site is not well served by transit at the present time, although • service to some points within a half mile is excellent. A single Metro route operates within reasonable walking distance of the project site: Route 241, _: which provides peak hour service only, traveling from Kenmore to Southcenter -9- y ... - �r. rS'rst'�friafe:C;.La.!va,.rFr.r., .�.,...,, �. �,,.._- .• -, .-... .. _....__ .ter-^^-�-^-�-- ,. .. ... .. .. .... . . _ • Table 1 Existing PM Peak Levels of Service • Intersection V/C LOS Rainier Avenue & Grady Way 1.01 F • Interurban Avenue & Grady Way 1.02 F 7th Street & Rainier Avenue . 0.83 D 7th Street & Edwards Road (Hardie)1 0.63 B Grady Way & Lind Avenue 0.87 D Grady Way & Powell Avenue 0.40 A 7th Street & Lind Avenue N/A A/B on 7th B-D on Lind2 1. Calculated V/C is deceptive because backups from the 7th Street & Rainier intersection frequently block this one. 2. This intersection is STOP-controlled, and the north leg is a private drive. Traffic on 7th is unimpeded; vehicles proceeding through or turning left from Lind experience significant delay. C 1 -10- in the AM and from Southcenter to Kenmore in the PM. The 241 travels on SW 7th between Rainier and Lind, proceeding south on Lind. According to Metro staff, when construction on Grady Way is complete (see next section), some routes that have been running on I-405 will return to Grady. Also, if 7th is improved east of Rainier, Metro would likely route several buses north on Lind from Grady, then east on 7th to the existing park- and-ride. This re-route would serve to bypass the Grady/Rainier intersection. The result of these changes .would be bringing several routes to the SW 7th/Lind intersection. All but one of the potentially-affected routes would offer peak hour service only. Transit service to the project site will be somewhat improved as a result of these changes, but not to a significant degree. Planned Improvements Various roadway and intersection improvement needs have been identified by vicinity agencies. In some instances, funding sources have been identified so that the improvements may be definitely scheduled. Four agencies were con- tacted to update the list of projects and scheduled completion: City of Renton Public Works, City of Tukwila Public Works, King County Public Works and Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) . The following vicinity improvements are presently scheduled for completion prior to 1990: Anticipated Completion Date • Grady Way: - Five-lane bridge extending west to Interurban 10/86 ' - Five-lane roadway from Lind Avenue to bridge 6/87 Add eastbound right-turn lane at Rainier unknown o SW 7th: extend five lane roadway from west of Powell to 0akesdale. 8/87 • 0akesdale Avenue, new construction: - Five-lane roadway from Grady Way to SW 7th 8/87 - Five-lane roadway from SW 7th to Monster Road 11/87 . - Five-Lane roadway and underpass from Grady Way to SW 16th Street 12/87 - Five-lane roadway from SW 28th to SW 16th unknown -11- J. :.y. r.'s.,•i lif'l„• - _ _ ! 1 t•,. '..�:v:t'r...:e2..^... .' ... .r r._ ,e..w�.�l�.�t.. s�`i:f's^ ., ,....,r .w . •.,_ . .... ... .. I • • • Traffic signals will be installed on Oakesdale Avenue at Grady Way and at SW 7th as part of the new construction. Major improvements to Monster Road and 68th Avenue S north of 0akes- dale at Monster Road to Sunset are proposed but not scheduled or funded. Anticipated Completion Date • Lind Avenue SW: - Five-lane roadway to bridge over I-405 from Grady Way to SW 16th Street (dependent upon the Oakesdale underpass) . 6/88 o Sunset Boulevard between Rainier Avenue and the west city limits. Add two-way, left-turn lane and improve • signalization. unknown • SW 16th Street between Lind Avenue and Oakesdale Avenue. Complete upgrading with curb, gutter and sidewalk, repaving, and channelization. unknown • SW 27th between Oakesdale and the West Valley Highway. New construction. unknown • Southcenter Boulevard/Grady Way/I-405/Interurban Avenue interchange. Reconstruction and reconfiguration. See Figure 5. 5 unknown e I-405 HOV lanes. The final segment (Renton S-curves) S is scheduled for 1989. unknown , • -12- d . .. . . • 6 . .. . • A .. �.•' • e ° NORTH o F oi‘ to I k 4 } a°ad IW- .- , . .4: ►A°���er So ;` - Grady Way "6 / . w c�tn`e^`et / 1 5 `� I_406 / NB i \ • . • • LEGEND NOT TO SCALE • -' ' 0 SIGNAL • • F J. STOP SIGN BLACK RIVER Figure TECHNOL®®V RECONFIGURATION OF SOUTHCENTER/ . . ,_ ..:ils PARK • GRADY/I-406/INTERURBAN Grvv(., A FUTURE CONDITIONS Analysis of future conditions is achieved by first, estimating future I - traffic volumes in the study area without the project, second, estimating project travel characteristics at full development, third, estimating future tvolumes with project and fourth, evaluating changes or impacts in the future system due to the project. Black River is expected to reach full development in 1995, thus this analysis of future conditions is focused on 1995. • Future Non-Project Traffic Future traffic volumes comprise three distinct elements: (1) existing volumes as the underlying basis, (2) new traffic generated by nearby projects scheduled for development, and (3) additional annual growth attributed to scattered development throughout the region. This is the typical procedure followed in impact studies: i .e. , to define project traffic above and beyond an underlying base condition. Two major developments in the immediate vicinity of the Black River Tech- ( nology Park have been identified and development has started for both the Valley 405 Business Park and the Washington Technical Center. Analysis of traffic impacts for these, two projects indicates that the Valley 405 Business Park would be fully developed by 1990 and that the Washington Technical Center would be complete by 1987. Estimated traffic volumes generated by these developments are included in the forecast of 1995 traffic volumes within the study area. - fIn addition to the known developments above, regional growth would result in further traffic volume increases on vicinity streets and highways. This increase has been based on recent trends (1980 to 1985) in traffic volumes, and upon population and employment forecasts done Puget Sound Council of P P Pby 9 Governments (PSCOG) . Annual growth has been estimated at 3 percent on a daily basis, and at 2 percent during the PM peak. Figure 6 shows total' non-project traffic volumes estimated for vicinity streets. L. With daily volumes projected to increase by 3 percent per year, 1995 daily volumes would be 30 percent higher than 1986. Because peak hour volumes are E: expected to grow somewhat more slowly, 1995 PM volumes are estimated to be 20 percent higher than 1986 PM peak volumes. -14- . • s `nae'y/ah� ® m ay ® `SR Q � 8,790•. ��p ® a¢i ' NORTH 1.080 c. 0 ¢ S. 3rd St. PROJECT 91TE \ ' • ® ,�/_/i •%., Sunset , s �i, // //,. ,.�. i/�� 53.530 f e R• // 2.930 v 4.050 ./��/ :��� 1! j 300 17.190 �1.610 4 . to go , SW 7th St. N 4404 0> ® o 26. 10 . glil 5. o • �-r _ , wo ® y 2.3e5 64 , CA*eo 0b20 N > 0 < a ' 10.900• 12 ® 1- < S1 > • 9 2.500 0 0 AQth ¢_ - • b i ti 26.530 26,840 a 21,8b0 2,47•. m �O'+' 2.570 �,250 2,070 J .. 1 ®„ 0 1,010 1-406 _ „•,_. a SW. 18th St. !' 27,000• 21.580 S o N 2.390 1.985 CC ., ., a V* 8.168th St. i • 4 O — . ` S • o ` 0 .e 41 4 . • 4J =0- - - - -- = 0 .4 1 .1% . o . l EGEI� a O 26.840 AVERAGE 11EEKDAY VOLUME 1 2,570 PM PEAK VOLUME • 01 1 31 - N ° ESTIMATED FROM CH2M HILL • 9 ' co . 1986 RENTON STUDY OATH •6 t JIs • BLACK RIVER Figure 6 MVO TECHNOLOGY ESTIMATED 1995 TRAFFIC VOLUMES •'` • '-. • PARK • WITHOUT PROJECT Grezr F. . I- Traffic assignments for 1995 have been made assuming that the new Oakes- dale_ Avenue would be complete. It is difficult to estimate future traffic volumes on Oakesdale Avenue for either daily or PM peak periods. Based upon rough estimates of daily volumes (EADT), two signals would be, warranted •on Oakesdale by 1995 (without the Black River Project) at Grady and at SW 7th. Operation of these signals is expected to be at LOS C or better without the project. No estimate has been made for 1995 volumes at the Grady Way/Interurban/ Southcenter intersections because of the planned reconstruction project. . It would be very difficult to reasonably estimate the rerouting of traffic that would result. Level of service analysis was repeated for vicinity intersections under future non-project conditions. Table 2 illustrates the results, with existing levels of service included for comparison. Table 2 Future Non-Project PM Peak Levels of Service [ Levels of Service Intersection 1986 1995 Rainier Avenue and Grady Way F F Interurban Avenue and Grady Way F N/A1 7th Street and Rainier Avenue D F 7th Street and Edwards Road (Hardie)2 B C II Grady Way and Lind Avenue394 D D Grady Way and Powell Avenue3 A" B I: 7th Street and Lind Avenue Left turns from 7th A/B A/F Thru, right and left from Lind B-D F E li 1. Planned reconstruction of intersection makes a reliable estimate impossible. 2. Back-ups from the 7th and Rainier intersection will frequently affect operation at this one. '11 3. Improvements to Grady Way presumed complete in 1987. 4. Improvements to Lind Avenue presumed complete in 1988. . 11 -16- ' F ' . , r The intersection of Rainier and Grady will continue to approach or exceed 1 theoretical capacity. The Interurban and Grady intersection will be extreme ly congested by 1987;' the likely result will be a lengthened peak period and possibly a greater traffic diversion to alternate I-405 access. To some extent, traffic can be expected to even out through the area as drivers learn to avoid trouble spots. In this area, however, all routes to the regional freeway system will be troublesome. By 1995, non-project traffic will result in deterioration to LOS E or worse at two intersections: 7th and Rainier, and 7th and Lind. These inter- sections, as well as Rainier and Grady, will be in need of improvement, even without the added impacts of the Black River Technology Park. Project Traffic Project-related traffic has been estimated in four steps. Trip generation is the estimation of total trips generated by the project at full development. Mode Split is a process of estimating the percentage of project trips made by each of the various transportation modes available near the site. Trip distribution is the process of predicting the origins and destinations of trips to and -from the project. Traffic assignment is the process of deter-. mining specific routes for the daily and peak hour trips, so that impacts upon roadways and intersections may be identified. Trip Generation. Table 3 summarizes estimated vehicle trip generation for the project, by building and completion date. Daily and peak hour trip rates are based on averages and assumptions reported in the ITE Trip Generation manual (Third Edition). In 1995, combined floor space of 701,000 gross square feet (GSF) is pro- posed to be complete, with 572,730 GSF for office use and 128,270 GSF for -- research and development (R&D) use. Total generati on on is estimated at 13,887 vehicles per day (vpd) and 1,589 vehicles per hour (vph) during the PM peak. [_ Mode Split. Many traffic analyses include an additional step at this . point, whereby total trips generated by a project are divided among the vari- Cous available travel modes. Depending upon the project location, this process has more or less significance. For example, considerable numbers of I: • l's . -17- : . . • , _ , F - 1 I . Table 3 Project Trip Generation Offic R&D Total Space Space2 Space. Daily PM Pk Pk In Pk Out Bldg # Yr Open (1K GSF) (1K GSF) (1K GSF) Trips Trips Trips Trips 24 1990 -- 20.50 20.50 297 34 5 29 L 25 1987 1991 84.00 56.00 140.00 2576 295 26.65 26.65 386 45 44 - 251 26 7 38 27 1989 31.50 -- 31.50 662 76 11 . 64 28 1989 51.50 -- 51.50 1082 124 19 105 29 1991 35.70 -- 35.70 750 86 13 - 73 30 1991 43.05 43.05 904 103 15 88 31 1992 42.50 -- 42.50 893 102 15 87 I. 32 1992 48.35 -- 48.35 1015 116 17 99 33 1993 48.35 -- 48.35 1015 116 17 99 34 1993 42.50 -- 42.50 893 102 15 87 I: 35 1994 37.68 25.12 62.80 1156 133 20 113 36 1995 107.60 -- 107.60 2260 258 39 220 I] Total Office Space, 1000 GSF 572.73 Total R&D Space, 1000 GSF 128.27 liTotal Space, 1000 GSF 701.00 Total Daily Trips, Full Development 13887 = r Total PM Pk Hr Trips, Full Development 1589 Total PM Pk Hr Trips In, Full Development 238 Total PM Pk Hr Trips Out, Full Development 1351 1. Trip generation for office space from ITE Trip Generation, 3rd Edition for Office Park. Daily: 21 trips/1000 Gross Square Feet (GSF); PM Peak: 11 2.4/1000 GSF. 2. Trip generation for research & development (R&D) space estimated by 50% of space = office, 25% = warehouse, and 25% = assembly. 11 Warehouse - Daily: 6 trips/1000 GSF; PM Peak: 0.9/1000 GSF. Assembly - Daily: 10 trips/1000 GSF; PM Peak: 1..0/1000 GSF.. Resulting R&D rates: Daily: 14.5 trips/1000 GSF; PM Peak: 1.675/1000 GSF. 1 1 -18- workers at an office building in downtown Seattle could be expected to commute via public transit. Also, the proximity of restaurants, banks, and shops and other would encourage midday pedestrian trips: On the other hand, a suburban office/technical park like Black River Technology Park does not present employees and visitors with the same oppor- tunities for transit and walk trips. As stated earlier, the project site is not at present well served by transit. Even if Metro incorporates all poten- tial routing changes, the nearest bus stops will be on Lind Avenue, Grady Way, and SW 7th east of Lind. Further, opportunities for pedestrian trips will be limited unless/until restaurants and shops develop nearby. A worst case traffic analysis is presented in this report where no allow- • ance has been made for transit or walk trips to the project site. An aggres- sive ridesharing incentive program may reduce project vehicle trips by 2-5%, but for this worst case analysis, all trips to and from the site are assumed to be made by vehicle with minimal ridesharing, as reflected in ITE trip estimates. Trip Distribution. Figure 7 illustrates the general origins and destina- tions of trips generated by the Black River Technology Park project, as developed by TRANSPO for the Valley 405 Business Park. The distribution has been based on two data sources. First, the travel distribution prepared in 1981 for the Bellevue Long Range Transportation Study was examined. Second, regional forecasts of employment and population prepared in March 1984 by the Puget Sound Council of Governments were considered. Daily and peak hour distributions vary somewhat. During the peak hour, project traffic is dominated by employee work-to-home trips. Throughout the ( day, project travel is oriented to other offices, to retail facilities, and to the regional freeway system. Traffic Assignment. Figure 8 illustrates the assignment of project traffic to vicinity streets and highways in 1995. A total of 13,887 vpd and 1,589 vph are assigned to the vicinity street system. Figure 8. includes the j new Oakesdale Avenue, its connection to the West Valley Highway, and the L extension of SW 7th to ,Oakesdale. Within the development itself, Naches Avenue from SW 7th to Oakesdale/Monster Road is shown. Also noted is the realignment of the Grady/ Interurban/Southcenter area. La [1 -19- ® ® riiRm P"'11 _ - . .. , ., '9 �` s vn.gyp hPhN'ay a ts 1 5% . 10% `sR 000 co -- 15% C .3 5% s PROJECT 3rd St. , SITEA 1, //,,,,,, ii/i/h ,� Suns.,. „wills, / •./��/1A. v NORTH /��1G�® //.��//L % ® �'" i SW 7th St. 1 0% ' 7 o a $ p , - * '-- au) c 6; -, rill 64 a c o N rt o 2t 13 v 11„,lbh... .. O 0' Y J 1 •�• 0 1-406 - CD -..1‘..Pjlr . 35% SW. loth St. 30%so :� t 0,hce''0r 6 ; o <. • w o :CC o. 1^405 S.158th St. a r i •i ' — 'L c3. > to o - t 'o CO i .c• _ _ CS - 20% 10% LECETO I 2 5 15% 35Z DAILY O 302 PM PEAK Os. 13 ' O BLACK RIVER Figure 7 M TECHNOLOGY OOLOGY PROJECT TRIP DISTRIBUTION . C,1 . . ;) sunset 4nae z m LS. 1.389 ity q 900 CC 6 O 972 BO NORTH 191 , CC S. 3rd St. PROJECT SITE a• • - 3.398 Sunset® 695 ® i// // „,, ,� 10.19 63 d� 389 ////,/—Ft. / ii/, 1.167 297 a 't0 // ��.6���" �//i ��� 34 4.722 695 48 �.0 1.667 1.'. 0 i ��/("/y,/,/ t / / 4,..10 .00045 v 4,.. 2.360 14 3 o• /�j�/ 026 477SW th St. 2s. _ S. '1 ... 51' �~ w® 13i / co 278 O3 9 3429 CC ' o •• $ c N 32 a.' • • ` 3,429 394 11� 6.377 co rn ® > IO 2.223 , ®ct• • 394 9. 640 _ O m N < to 6,075 1.424 ® < St s 286 - 417 as OCO 760 • 163 p gOlh < - - _ 1,806 48 9 - • O. I 238 .. m 3.750 a 3,055 c y I 695 430 0 1,702 334 e 32 •O 179 1-405 2,224 SW. 16th St. 1 694 � 695 . 32 •' C 3 78 O ,0 695 SOON' r" Y • 159 C8., $,Va • • 4 a F • �� 1-4135 ' S.158th St. y. r •L a • 2.361 _ • G • 366 • 0 •• o li % ..Q • • • 1 LEGEND t is 3.750 AVERAGE tEEKDAY VOLUME ' 9' 430 PM PEAK VOi.UP£ _. 1 6 - BLACK RIVER Figure 8 lIke TECHNOLOGY PROJECT TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENT ' ;. : ',..'..�. PARK : 1995 • GreVp • Total Traffic with Project Figure 9 shows future traffic volumes for 1995 including project-generated traffic. The volumes shown represent the sum of non-project and project volumes for both daily and PM peak periods, from Figures 6 and 8. Also shown are percentage figures which indicate the portion of total traffic generated by the project. In 1995, traffic from Black River Technology Park project is estimated to account for 12 percent of the total daily traffic on Powell Avenue SW, for 60 percent of the total daily traffic on SW 7th between Powell and Oakesdale, and for 47 percent of the estimated total daily traffic on Oakesdale Avenue north of Grady Way. Project traffic is expected to make up 12 percent of total daily traffic on Grady Way west of Oakesdale. Project contributions to PM peak hour traffic for these streets are similar to that for the daily traffic. Project impact lessens with distance from the site. Table 4 shows PM peak hour levels of service (LOS) for key intersections within the project study area for 1995 both with and without project traffic. Decreased LOS due to the project will be noted at Grady Way and Lind Avenue and at Grady Way and Powell Avenue. Table 4 1995 PM Peak Levels of Service 1995 1995 Intersection 1986 Without Project With Project LOS LOS V/C LOS V/C L . .Rainier Avenue & Grady Way F F 1.23 F 1.26 SW 7th & Rainier Avenue D F 1.13 F 1.26 SW 7th & Edwards Road (Hardie)1 B C 0.72 C 0.73 Grady Way & Lind Avenue D D 0.86 E 0.95 Grady Way & Powell Avenue A B 0.63 C 0.73 SW 7th & Lind Avenue • Left turn from 7th A/B A/F N/A A/F N/A Left/thru/right from Lind B-D F N/A F N/A- 1. Back-ups from the 7th and Rainier intersection will frequently affect operation at this one. L • -22- Q""t r'l r---' • --- 8p nb°f yohip ` ' 1' . Q 10.180 142 3R 800 < ¢. 1.660 12X I•tO NORTH 13.123 78% C 1.467 802 cC S. 3rd St.0.926 PROJECT . 1.067 SITE 3.398 61Y 1 O. .. 389 0 67% ////iii/i/ f//��/��/ SUf%$8t , A 54.997 3% �' ,„,/!_ . R. / /� 4.193 3% '� /////y�`"y'//`v / • ���// / /�sifb„ 22.190 .23X �• � L 1W // i 2.087 23%7 to 1/��i'i� ...es . • ° V/ / SW 7th St. �v> i I <1• 9.319 37X1 • o <» 30,732 15X Oil .115i ' 6.599 52x 1.194 332 ' , y E co ol0 c 2.830 16% G4669 L 784 50X 0 '10.577 < • 0 24.980 24% 1.060 _ _ < �28.753 6% - 1.044 3.260 23X 60% ItF.. < 1O`� $ < 2.756 1.,:, 9 100 •! 60% p 11.674 12% a .0 • • 0 4 1.173 14% • 24.895 12% J 1 . 0 30.590 12% a 2.404 14X W °. 3.000 4% 0 1-406 . 1 _ a :117./ - c .22.275 30 0 M 3% 3x - 4. �rhc®°'®r �W d. : < N 2.550 6% c t-4015 , 8.188th St. > >. < o o i o - > - I • ® • .c . • • o w 'o ' % 0 a o z LEGEND • 4 s -e • 1.044 AVERAGE WEEKDAY VOLUME • 1 v 100 PN PEAK VOLL€ X CONTRIaJTICN wr PROJECT -. ' : 9 • OF TOTAL TRAFFIC (30 BLACK RIVER Figure 9t TECHNOLOGY . : -00A , PARK ESTIMATED 1995 TOTAL TRAFFIC WITH PROJECT GrOlt r MITIGATION Traffic impacts from the Black River Technology Park are most significant in the immediate vicinity of the project where new roadways are proposed to serve this project and traffic from adjacent new developments. Traffic oriented east and south from the site will use existing facilities which are currently at or near capacity during peak periods. The purpose of mitigation for this project is two fold: (1) to reduce site-generated vehicle trips, and (2) to significantly improve project site access. A transportation management plan for the project will be developed by the project proponent with the aim of reducing vehicle trips, and a list of improvements to the transportation network are presented which are expected to mitigate project impacts. Transportation Management Plan The developer is committed to working with Metro Transit and Commuter Pool to develop a transportation management plan for the project which will encourage ridesharing and attempt to reduce project vehicle trips. The trans- portation management plan (or IMP) may consist of any or all of the following items: • Work with METRO to establish a new bus route or modify an existing bus route to pass through the project. • If bus service is modified to be convenient, encourage, employers to consider transit pass subsidies as a company or office/tech park benefit. [_ • First City Development Corp. will provide a contact person for the office/tech park as a liaison between Metro and the tenants. [I o First City Development Corp. agrees to work with Metro to determine the viability of vanpools financed in order to reduce the project in vehicle trip generation. • Office park management should advise tenants and their employees of the advantages of fleet ride, vanpool and carpool programs through a package of information provided at initial occupancy for each tenant, 1] and through periodic promotional displays within the leasing office. -24- l • As much as practical , office park management should encourage employers ` to initiate a flextime work schedule so peak period traffic can be distributed more evenly over the 3:30 PM to 5:30 PM peak period. • Notification of employer occupancy dates and resulting estimated employee numbers on an ongoing basis. Transportation Network Improvements The construction of Oakesdale Avenue from Grady Way to Monster Road will provide access to the Black River Technology Park. However, this single roadway is not enough to provide good access to the project from any direction. Peak period congestion along Rainier Avenue to the east of the site is an obstacle for traffic which is difficult to remove, as the intersections are currently designed near the maximum in lane configuration and operation. Improvements in the access network must then come from another source or focus on another area. 0akesdale Avenue Corridor. It is proposed to construct Oakesdale Avenue, from SW 43rd to Sunset Highway (SR 900) (along Monster Road and 68th Avenue S) , although scheduled construction is from SW 16th to Monster Road. Approxi- mately 10 percent of Black River traffic is estimated to use Monster Road and , 68th Avenue S to access Sunset which, when added to Valley 405 Business Park traffic on the route and current traffic, would increase daily traffic on 68th Avenue S from 800 trips in 1984 to approximately 10,180 trips in 1995. Traffic from the Black River development will represent approximately 14 percent of the total in 1995. The existing two-lane minimal design facility should be improved to a two-lane facility with shoulders and 11-12 foot lanes. The project proponent will agree to participate in an improvement district to construct the extension of Oakesdale to the Sunset Highway. Naches Avenue Design. Naches Avenue, the proposed on-site roadway serving Black River, will be constructed initially as a cul-de-sac, to be extended the full length to 0akesdale/Monster Roads as the Black River development progresses. The length of cul-de-sac which would provide a single access to Black River 6 (aside from Powell Avenue to building 24) with acceptable operation was analyzed. Naches Road will operate satisfactorily as a cul-de-sac with STOP control at 7th Street through the construction and occupation of Building 25 in 1987. Subsequently, an all-way STOP will be required at 7th and Naches to permit -25- • [I left-turning traffic to exit the Black River development. By 1989, under the proposed build-gut scheme, a traffic signal may be warranted at this intersec- tion. The project proponent agrees to pay their proportionate share for traffic control at this intersection. 17 Network Improvements. The following is a list of problem areas within the P . Jstudy ro 'ect area which need to be addressed. on a subarea basis. Congestion at many locations in Renton is 'a function of area growth, new developments and bypass or thru traffic, therefore funding for these projects should be shared among those groups involved. Percent Project Location Action Traffic Grady Way @ Lind Avenue Add third eastbound thru lane 7.7 to Rainier SW 7th @ Lind Avenue Install signal 16.1 • SW 7th @ Powell Avenue 4-way STOP, as left turns from 28.8 Powell become intolerable. Install signal when warranted. SW 7th @ Naches Road Install signal 67.4 Monster Road/68th Avenue S Improve 2-lane roadway 13.7 1 -26- s L . SUGARY r- 1 _ Traffic impacts of the Black River Technology Park are significant in the local area bounded by Rainier Avenue, Grady Way, Monster Road, and the Sunset Highway. Levels of service are projected to be poorest in the.east side of the study area even without the project along Rainier Avenue. Construction of the project contributes to a further degradation of that level of service to . the extent that peak periods will lengthen. - _ The City of Renton has hopes that the construction of 0akesdale Avenue from south of 43rd up to SR 900 via the 68th Avenue S alignment may provide some relief for Rainier Avenue. No studies have yet been done to demonstrate the amount of diversion that might occur. Yet it is obvious that additional roadway facilities must be built. Five road and intersection improvements have been identified which will be significantly impacted by this project. Each improvement can mitigate the project impact to provide level of service D or better. The percentage the project contributes to the 1995 traffic at those locations has been estimated. Such a contribution estimate could be used as a consideration in determining cost sharing for the improvements. • 1 I _ I - [ 1. -27- L -op R4-, ECF: I -V-C -3fcI c; $% :,0 z • City of Renton LU: SA —°�`� ° ` o • �l • 0 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST 4 ,9gTEa SE PI • Purpose of Checklist: The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43,21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental Impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for allproposals • with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist Is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, If it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. • Instructions for Applicants: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description.you can. , • You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. 'If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply." Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies.can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional • :information that will help describe your proposal or Its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impacts. • Uoe of Checklist for Nonproject Proposals: (Please Type or Print Legibly) Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D). For nonproject actions (actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs), the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: ADMAC Building B1ackRiver Corporate Park (Earlington Industrial Park) 2. Name of applicant: First City Equities } 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Barbara Moss ' First City Equities 800 Fifth Avenue, Suite 4170 Seattle, Washington 98104 (206) 624-9223 • 4. Date checklist prepared: June 5, 1986 i . 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Renton Building & Zoning 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Construction - Summer 1986 CM OF. RENTON • • PO ; Al JUN l 01966 BUILDING/ZONING DEPT. • • 7. Do you have any pl for future additions, expansions, .i. urther activity related ' to or connected wit; ,;,;is proposal? if yes, explain. Possible Phase II of the project to add -"warehouse office 'and area : w.ith ' parking as required to the North of proposed project. Phase II Landscaping to reflect Phase I concept and specific requirements to be detrmined at that. time. • • . 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. Original E. I.S. for Black River Office Park by R.W. Thorpe and. Associates for Renton Property Associates, April , 1983. 9I, Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other • proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. No. 10. List any governmental approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. City of Renton Building Permit and Site Plan Approval . 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist j ' that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to ''' repeat those answers on this page. j • Design and construction of a 93,170 S.F. two story building with office, manufacturing and warehouse uses. Parking for the various uses shall be provided as required by code. Landscape yards •to be incorporated with the parking a d building on approximately 187,9.22 S. F. of site, excluding a landscape buffe (not required) established by First City Equities as part of this phase and the Master Plan Development. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand . the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and • section, township, and range if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topography map, if reasonably available. While you • should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate 'maps o:• detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. j Located in an existing area of development adjacent similar projects off• . • Natches Avenue S.W. and ±600' North of S.W. 7th in Renton, Washington (North of Interstate 405). •i B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. EARTH a. General description of the site (circle one); rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other Fl at b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? One Percent (1%) except area of drainage ditch. c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, caly, sand, gravel, peat, 'muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. Sand, Silt and gravel d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. No. - 2 - • e. Describe the pur a, type, and approximate quantit of any filling or ' grading proposed. indicate source of fill. 0 Fill or surcharge material to be used is on site, per separate approved ; . permits. Any new. structural .f.i.l.l will be hauled on site. Source unknown f. Lohh uld is occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. Site is flat, minor erosion of surface could occur on site. . f g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? 75% h. Proposed measures to reduce, or control erosion, or other impacts to the • earth, if any: . :Siltation and erosion control per City Standards. • 2. AIR a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., . dust, .automobile, odors, industrial wood ,smoke) during construction and • • when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Normal emmissions from dust, auto and truck equipment, and roofing during construction. b. Are there any off-site sources of emission? No. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: • • • Water site to reduce dust. 3. WATER a. Surface:1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. P-1 drainage channel one-half (1/2) mile away. I 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. No. • 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. N/A crr OF RiF,INTON "F JUN 1 Q 1986 - 3 - BUILDING/ZONING DEPT. 4) Will the proposal `-,uire surface water withdrawals c 'iversions? Give • • general description ,Jrpose, and approximately quantiti .F known. „ • No. • • - l • • 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on • • the site plan. • Yes. } 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface • ! •i • • waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. None. • • b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and appaoximately quantities if known. • • • • None. . 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from • septic Eanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; • industrial, containing the following chemicals . . .; agricultural; etc.). •• Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the • number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. - • None. c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of . collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. Storm water into storm drainage system per City Standards and to detention area at P-1 channel . 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally • describe. • No. 1 a• „ 47. . - 4 - • (1.O�jf` 1 . tt �1TXw . ,.•.3ltats_. ...0..a. , ... .,. ., ..