Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLUA90-108 • • • if ,r _ _ s�,_. 4 r• +' �, �y + yr •t �' • • t ;� } • �'..4-1‘•� - - . •". 4.r!.A., i ..+ 1. wo+ +� .•0)ilok fr`ie 1• il • I It., i. 4 '' a _ T kir'_ 0 fir, .• r r •* •y 4. f• • a �4 N., M Li ... ,• N .Y: '�"T Ala , ° .ram • r ..r' .' •"+� •r c .�v 1 re..; '�! • a 114 v ' Y w • rt.f '.� �. ':,: •. -••' ,,y . • 1. ,•••`;'l iiA:4; ' .Y. -. 1 f,. ' _ :.• 400,1" r. . • .. am. .2.itt • , . + dr , A a 440..,. .,,.....,...-.. . • !4 ,, • 'fir .t • ;r "' ) •' ,1- ril . . miiiiiiii . . i--.:,;. - . •:." ,.: ...,..-ie _ jjj,��� \�_ s . r. 1 ;i. ).. ** '•r' • -s-7... -'Ai # ''. 4' 14. • II • '.., "k t• • . , .his_ ,rJ•F „ • .e ... t 1 . . it:. ' .41.44 '.' . WS .$ ',..., ;.. ck,-i • ,444 ..- 11IL`I ;‘, ., .... • .,% * 1 ♦! r , mow.• + • 4_ \; � v:r A � ! ' ` ` . :_ - � • '`-eti - � � i _ I' yy� 11 + } �•- : , , •!� �tr ... .:.._... : ., 111,6 iii... . 1 . l' 'S .01;....' ”...t.fir92,'..',,, , • ' -4 • .- - % -*- -- •' r 'i i 4� �. "" ' 1 tilt{ y C i . . • PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF RENTON OCT 2 5 1991 . RELIVED . . . . _. • . ,,.... 1 • . • - . .3 '.. .. . /.----/ 162124/Z /70 /1:-Y22?10,27;Z"ry . . Ai/Obit)BP f2 /.1 F.- 2 OP. . . . z 1.11 a/ 1 -7-- to IN 230 .....„.1 --7L+. c),L15%. „------` --- --4.- • III . ----J-4 0 s . I N M l't'"s--..r..leo • ,• "..., ,_..1.4.8'..4, NI • • ' .' , ,...,'. - -.... . , LIJ . . • -. --, " -r.=.. Z2.0 ---- - ---_-' . • fiC2F-Ifi g‘ 2 01-- ,Fi•-:X47E. • ige),AB ,1S iii.e,f(?‘.')J el) /Sy .s.: . o P ,e1/72›./ sy-iii:g -., . .. -,.... ,,, . _ . -1,....._,, -- ---, i /"" . . . . • . . . • t-- -,.,,,./ _ . . . . . . , . -,,,,,,-.‘:4„,. - - - 0) .9 . . .-.. .'kr":rik:.ri'r':. p 7_.or) . • . SEG-rib Q )s - Pt. C 40-118/, D • .‘ '.2...C.:(2) 1._____ .... „ .•--2 lig 4',.' ,i.,i),T':---- •, ,, . .. . . . '• Z?-''''',ii.1 c:';:ec4>:qrk-1/4 . , -) -e91-445 oi /47/ .--. ii. i' '24, I •, • • - ''-'''''?•--P1•;?i,2 . . . . ,/,' /...- / •=r- /C7 . . . . . • . . . . . .. .._. _.. . . -r-TREL.\-4,o 7 2 4kb(2-7.-.?t-A7t— • . - • . _. • ---.-"1-Z.,•Vrk J. oy':',1 • 2r49 v‘Y- z).4 7- - /c,-2,5-. 9/ . . .. • • 0,, : ' .. • - • .. . . I . • _ ,.,•.. , . ji.' - .-" , . , . . ' _ i 61. . . . . . ... ..... . , — . ... , , .. ,. `K. ‘--. l . .---i.:- . . , ,. _ - - •-il 1'1•:-..,.; ' CI) r.r- , .1 . .EXHIBIT • • 'EXHIBT_& - T•'-,, '• .9,• • - . EXHIBIT NO. i -.....:.ii . . "-- -. . . . . . ,_ .. . ' . . f?„-,, c ..14 \ L'4'," ... . . . ,. . . .. .... . , - .. : . ,... • _-' ITEM 1\1- •4 i . - 1.-•:-..,n_gineett'.-\----- . . .... ._ ,.... .„ .. -.•. . • • -11/4-......-..-\...-, ---- . . _ . . • . . . . . PREL L Wl TZ SHORT PLAT APPROVALS I SW 1/4 OF THE NE 1/4 OF SECTION 32, TOWNSHIP 24 NORTH, EXAMINED AND APPROVED THIS DAY OF 1991 W.M. RANGE 5 EAST, HEARING EXAMINER = . CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON EXAMINED AND APPROVED THIS DAY OF 1991 1 n_A70' ADMINISTRATION,PLANNING, BUILDING AND PUBLIC WORKS • EXAMINED AND APPROVED THIS DAY OF 1991 GRAPHIC SCALE DEVELOPMENT SERVICE MANAGER to m EXAMINED AND APPROVED THIS DAY OF 1991 (IN FS6T) TRANSPORTA OON SYSTEM MANAGER I inch= 40 tt EXAMINED AND APPROVED THIS DAY OF 1991 BASIS OF BEARING=KCAS DATUM KING COUNTY ASSESSOR DEPUTY I • I LEGAL DESCRIP7ON LOT 9, BLOCK 4, HILLMAN'S C.D. LAKE WASHINGTON GARDEN DIV. NO. 7, ACCORDING TO PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN VOL 16 OF N 88'0929"W N PLATS PAGE 18, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGON. 147.25' 298.51' I 151.25' '---71 "X' PRIVATE ROAD LEGAL DESCRIPTION COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 9, BLOCK 4 OF HILLMAN'S C.D. W 30' - LAKE WASHINGTON GARDEN OF EDEN DIV. ND. 7) THENCE S 88'51'22'E 132.26 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE N 0139'54"E 105.26 I • LOT 4 a N I m FEET TO A POINT OF TANGENCY; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG A CURVE TO Arl:'- h o LOT 3 THE LEFT WI7N A RADDUS OF 15 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF o•, 7 90'1020"AND AN ARC LENGTH OF 23.61 FEET; THENCE N 883026"W 4.95 FEET; THENCE N 0139 54"E 20.00 FEET THENCE S 88 30 26"E Isli RI- 2 ^'n 70.00 FEET, THENCE S 013954"W 20.00 FEET; THENCE N 883026"W L., i 5.05 FEET TO A POINT OF TANGENCY; THENCE ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT I ry h W �N W I DIMA RADIUS OF 15 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 8949'40" AND AN ARC LENGTH OF 23.52 FEET; THENCE S 0139'54"W 105.16 FEET, pa'i• 35.00' 35.00' , THENCE N 885122"W 30 FEET TO THE TRUE OF BEGINNING. O-pr N 68'4''6 26"W o ku Q 1122s' 5/N 4.95' 5.05' , - 117.21 N 883026"W ry 116.34' Q• CER71F1CA7E 2 I N 8830'26"W 121.39' eW al 0 W A= 907020" A= 8949'40" ^ , 1 I O R= 1500' N Q R= 15.00' h W i(WE)HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I AM(WE ARE) THE OWNER(S)IN FEE SIMPLE h T= 15.05'0 N ^ Q m T= 14.96' - Isu OF THE LAND HEREBY PLATTED IN THIS SHORT PLAT. JI o� LOTI L=23.61' a �^ L=23.52' h2 I 1., a L I OWNER OWNER 2 m ins.y.1L W W W W LOT 2 oas aces `v Q AKNOWLEDGEMENT h a Q N o,�.o_ A= 8931'19" 30' I h h ,h R=25.00' I STATE OF WASHINGTON ) • o ", T=24.79 SW CORNER 2 2 2 L =39.06' COUNTY OF KING ) SS OF LOT 9, BLK 4 THIS IS TO CERTIFY 7HAT ON THIS DAY OF_,A.D. t 732.26' 30 00' 199_,BEFORE MC THE UNDERSIGNED,A NOTARY PUBLIC" 111.64' _ PERSONALLY APPEARED N 6857 22"W e 273.90' I TO ME KNOWN TO BE THE 30' 30• INDIVIDUAL(S)WHO SIGNED NE ABOVE CERRF7CATE AND ACKNOWLEDGED 30' TO ME THAT THEY SIGNED THE SAME AS THOR FREE VOLUNTARY ACT AND 655.71' N 885122"W I. I DEED.MNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL THE DAY AND YEAR FIRST 147.26' — — — — — — _ 1310.22' ABOVE WRITTEN. 81.19PUBLIC IN AND FOR THE 30' 30, STANOTTE OF WASHINGTON,RESIDING NE 3V TH STREET EAST 1/4 CORNER OF AT RE/TON. SECTION 32-24-5 \ IEI TOUMA ENGINEERS 15668 West Volley Hwy•Seattle,WA 98188 (206)255-4100 SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE �NF,F WA �� RECORDING CERTIFICATE THIS MAP CORRECTLY REPRESENTS A SURVEY �ti� r, ry`'z FILED FOR RECORD THIS DAY OF . 199 Drawn by TO Checked by KO MADE BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTION IN DDD/ CONFORMANCE WITH THE SURVEY RECORDING ACT v, _. j 5 AT IN BOOK OF SURVEYS ON AT THE REQUEST OF DOUGLAS PRELLWITZ = 5524 X PAGE AT THE REQUEST OF KENNETH J. OYLER Job No. 639-001-901 Drawing No. 63901SPL RRFI�IN MARCH 14, p19�9�/1J. 3/ZO/�/' I+lee l,\\`�('1.,c t„� Dote MARCH 7, 1991. Sheet 1 Of 1 Q /NUMBER 5524 DATE MANAGER SUPERINTENDENT OF RECORDS . — < ------ ----- „.......1 ___ 5011/W . '4. 5 ...0.012:-.7- " - 7--- _ 4s1-k / \ _ _ -Rei\i " 0 --5(z)141V1 -H12 -" h--. rfrc------ ---- --1Pe3L4.-• ------- sH - pi_----; v- tos -49.0 If/ ,„lc , . \ C I vp , , 3 1 -z. (6,0s7= 1 A .:. ‘k.----- . -........,.._ 7 i - - fv,4- - - Faks4:7 i , 1 i--. -....,N N . _ . ._ 1 li, PM-.1; i I -I- 1.4i ' - - <- --1-- . \ 1 \ • A CINUSORNIA . tftir Ce' -"ti - S-17 q-- .- -- ammobam. e . 11,1111 eli4tV4:1#°1 EX # APPENDIX A ✓ sik` 4)2 10F.JJ MINIMUM LOT SIZE -- VERTICAL SEPARATION v Vertical Separation(1),(2) Between Drainfields & Impervious Layer or Water Table Pressure(5) Soil Texture Tyee(3) _ Minimum Lot Size(4) Gravity Distribution Soil Texture Type 1 acre(6). _ n/a n/a - coarse sands or coarser 1 acre 3'(48") 2'(30") Soil Texture Type 2 12,500 ft2 3'(48") 2'(30") • - medium - fine sand 1 acre 2'(36") Soil Texture Type 3 15,000 ft2 3'(48") 2'(30") - loamy sand 1 acre 2'(36") Soil Texture Type 4 18,000 ft2 3'(48") 2'(30") - sandy loam, loam 1 acre 2'(36") Soil Texture Type 5(7) - porous, well developed 20,000 ft2 n/a n/a structure in silt & silt loans (1) The vertical separation requirement for on-site systems using mounds.or sand filters is partially met through design features. These systems must have a minimum original permeable soil depth of eighteen (18) inches. (2) The numbers in parentheses indicate the minimum original permeable soil necessary to meet the required vertical separation. (3) Soils which are classed as excessively permeable, regardless of texture type, must meet all the requirements of soil texture type 1. (4) Minimum lot size requirements are based on soil texture type per unit volume of sewage (450 gallons per day) or single family residence. (5) The minimum vertical separation requirement for one acre lots using on-site systems 'with pressure distribution can be met by installing the trenches in the top nine (9) inches of soil with a twenty-one (21) inch minimum vertical separation or by installing in the top six (6) inches of soil with a minimum of twenty-four (24) inch separation. (6) Lots with a soil texture type 1 (and other excessively permeable .soils) and which have acre or less lot size, must be developed with an alternative on-site sewage system which provides a degree of treatment to the sewage equal to or greater than the treatment provided by a mound or sandfilter. (7) On-site systems in soil texture type 5 soils must consist of a mound system, sand filter, or equivalent. -38- EXHIBIT kPtog • ; Wu-.'r't; •1. ,ir1,':4,%!i45i ,0.'•.•�'..c�{ (i4if*"!C certificate provides the partment •of- Health and : Please return to: ' • uildjng & Land Development BUILDING & LAND • DEVELOPMENT' ;.W1 lnfor,matl0n necessary to 'Parks, Planning' and Resources Department evaluate development proposals. 3600 - 136th Place Southeast Bellevue, Washington 98006-1400 • : (206) 296-6600 KING COUNTY CERTIFICATE OF -WATER AVAILABILITY lDo•not write an this box . I . number name ' ❑ Building Permit 0 Preliminary Plat or PUD . , g Short Subdivision 0 Rezone or other . � /0 M-4—)A' • APPLICANT'S NAME !c lf]c> ! !�' G 7'7 . PROPOSED USE 9 . .�l r� y/c l` -r ..►., , /y 0 c.,, �/` ',et, S • LOCAT ION�up 3 ‘ i " IbL 112-f'� • (Attach map & legal description if necessary) # • Si ' # • # # # # # # • # # # # # # # WATER PURVEYOR INFORMATION 1. a. Water will be provided.by service connection only to an existing• • water main feet from the site. size OR • ' b. a Water service will require an improvement to the water system of: `;--liT., • • Qa (1) Tess than 5M± feet of water main to reach the site; 1� d/or w " , Li (2) the construction of a distribution system on the site; and/or " • (3) other (describe) Extend. line to North property line. El)CT 21 1990 • . 2. a. Ei The water system is in conformance with a County approved witer •comprehensive •plaa OR !t • • b. .0 The water systemOimprovement will require a water comprehensive plan amendment. • N 3. a. ® The proposed project is within the corporate limits of the district, or has been • granted Boundary Review Board approval for extension of service outside the distz • or city., or is within the County approved service area of a private water purveyc OR b. Annexation.,or,, BRB approval will be necessary to provide service. • 4. a. ED Water is/or will b'eava'ilable at the rate of flow and duration indicated below at no less than 20 psi measured at the nearest fire hydrant on site feet from the building/property (or as Marked-On the attached map) : . EAST DISTRICT Rate of Flow Durat' 1_____,) SERVICE CEnTER J ❑ less than 500 gpm (approx. gpm) 0 less th 7,P 0 V� . _•, ❑ 500 to, 999 gpm . . ❑ 1 hour to 2ers2 1990 , Q 1000 gpm or more FOR . . 0 2 hours or more ❑ flow test of • gpm ❑ other • ❑ calculation of . gpm "1CQmmercial Building Permits require flow ' OR : test or calculation) b. r 1 Water system is not capable of providing fire flow. ' • •. ----litrilrbllilTlli,tijr t SW 1/4 OF THE NE '1/4 i -= SECTION 32, TOWNSHIP 24 N ' •.\1111 / RANGE 5 EAST, W. M. A CITY OF RENTON, WASHING 1 it r t. GRAPHI SCALE 0 20 40 80 160 ( IN FEET ) 1 inch = 40 ft. 1 BASIS OF BEARING = KCAS DATUM I I N 88 09 29" W 298.51' I ! 151.25' ""- —A i �u - 30' n LOT 4 v I T1 � . LOT 3 I ' ' — i7 #relf " - S N V N t1.tj0 acres 1 (o40cf,�'� a) cV W 0.3 G Qeres N-j c cV . rh c, 1 I 41 35.0 35.00' \ o � N c8; rn 2 p „,7 ,7c 4.95' ' 5.05' o 0 ► - iiN z 116.34' I' ' H 4 N 8830'26" W 121.39' �L N I A = 9070'2/ ' A = 8949'40" ^ I . ' Y) R = 15.00' N , 7LI LOT 1 g W N , �"k 4.1 W LOT 2 m lb`37 ,.Fes; Q 0,37 aere-f 0) Q i zfeeff, 89 1'19" 30 ;- 0.1. tl f R = 25. 0' T = 24. 9 SW CORNER t - JJ. 6' t OL Z � OF LOT 9, BLK 1432.26' 31 OO' 111.64' N 8851'22" W I 273.90' 30' ._ O' 30' f 655. 11' N 8851'22" W I - I ), 181. 19' I r 30' NE 36TH STREET 30' . EAST 1, 1 SECPOI le EXHIBIT NO. . , ,,_/ -60 : ITEM NO.-SkPY J, /O !t )R'S CERTIFICATE i-.-1A‘lq L• o k RECORDING CERTIFICATE � aF a sy� F� P CORRECTLY REPRESENTS A SURVEY �� ���. FILED FOR RECORD THIS DI Y ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTION INh o MANCE WITH THE SURVEY RECORDING ACT "' %_ o AT IN BOOK (Submit Application,Plot•Plan and Other Required Documents in Triplicate) • APPLICATION FOR PRELIMINARY SEATTLE-KING COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH HEALTH DEPARTMENT ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SERVICES SUBDIVISION APPROVAL a6--d 7 The following must be completed and the appropriate fee must accompany this application. Fee:$100.00 plus$25.00 per lot.If public water and public sewer—Total Fee:$25.00. RECEIVED Check Appropriate Box: SUBDIVISION ❑ SHORT SUBDIVISION a O C T 0 4 1990 • LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT 0 REZONE 0 ALDER SQUARE NAME AND/OR NUMBER OF B.A.L.D.APPLICATION I Pre l lwitz 1 APPROXIMATE STREET ADDRESS 1 1113 6 S.E. 88th St (N.E. 36th St.- Renton) I LEGAL DESCRIPTION I Lot 9, Blk 4, Hillman's C.D. , Lake Washington Garden Eden1 PARCEL#: I 33/15170r012110 I I 1 1 • NUMBER OF LOTS NUMBER OF ACRES 11 F 6 6 I . TO BE REVIEWED 11 4 I SMALLEST LOT SIZE 11 i 1 i I sq.ft, • • OWNER 'Doug Prellw4tADDRESS 12609 NE 6th P1 Renton 980516 PHONE 1 235-716 4 I ' (AG 1Jack Brooks1 ADDRESS 123347 S.E. May Valley Rd- I PHONE 1392-5702 I Issaquah 98027 • • THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION MUST BE PROVIDED: WATER SUPPLY:(Complete Section 1,2 or 3 below) • • • •Section).x❑ Existing Public Water Supply I City of Renton I (Name) Attach Certificate of Water Availability Section 2.❑ Proposed Public Water Supply I 1 • (Name) ElDeclaration of Covenant Attached ❑ Recording# I 1 1 .1 i 1 1 1 1 1 I ,or �I ❑ To be recorded with final approval l ❑ Waterline Easements Attached ❑ Recording# I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I ,or ❑ To be recorded with final approval - ❑ Water Use Agreement Attached • 0 Recording# I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ,or - . ❑ To be recorded with final approval 0 Restrictive Covenant(s)(if applicable) b‹) C41t.. • Attached 0 Recording# I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I ,or .. ❑ To be recorded with final approval Section 3.❑ Individual Wells(All lots must be 5 acres or greater) • SEWAGE DISPOSAL:(Complete Section 1,2 or 3 below) o Section 1.❑ Existing Sewer District I 1 (Name) Attach Certificate of Sewer Availability I• Section 2.J Individual On-Site Sewage Systems () FAST C CENI:T 1 •� A-- Attach Soil Log Descriptions(Minimum 1 per lot)and U1�rrvirr ceNTra j�/I 1-4 ���r::�...v...��� Plot Plan(include lot lines,lot sizes,&location of soil log holes) JU} z ,11�V/LI, _ frni Section 3.❑ Community/Larger On Site Sewage System . . NOV 2 1990 1.--4 • Attach Preliminary Report • } • I,hereby,certify the informatio iven in this application is a true an ccurate rapt ntation of the existing conditions on this • r_-t plat. - _....... . ' 6W k®.+ Signature of Owner/Agent Date to--3--9V Signature of Certified Designer;E• ineer.or R.S. ad Date /0.3-i 7111�v:::i i OFFICE USE ONLY 0-APPROVED 0 DISAPPROVED /64/2) t 9/�7i-f��, . (Date) _ (Sanitarian) (District Supervisor) • . COMMENTS: I A_Lr.l i +f� 27-1;/�('-. /' ,'7ri..yrrZ-/L1.:( V lu.Ct/0%Z,di pi,'m 7.)1 i;. , . . ai,(.•.1 /l.4r'.4,r.r,'r'iqr. 7/1,;f fJ1fJ ?L-911./irl A. 11�-ii� /<�, DISTRICT HEALTH CENTERS CS13.1S.93 CENTRAL SOUTHWEST SOUTHEAST EAST NORTH • 172-20th Avenue 10821-8th Ave.S.W. 3001 N.E.4th 2424.156,h Ave.N.E. 10501 Meridian Ave.N. SEATTLE 587-4632 SEATTLE 344-6000 RENTON 344-6708 BELLEVUE 344.6891 SEATTLE 363-4785 ,., • • 0—,1 •-- • ° •nt h . , . 0 0• . 4 . .. C\I 3 _ d cr; o . • z . izacitkFi-z- . 35' 35' • • 114.34' [ • 114.341 • ... i =30 BROOKS & ASSOCIATES 0 23347&E. MAY VALLEY RD. ISSAQUAH,WA 99327 0 2 ZD Lo =- st Fi . w - - 2 0 I 1-- < . Ef . 1 . . • _ fiTil 1-4 F_, g 7:, 30t 10. 9,64, • .4_,..) L . :),j• 134.261 • r.i • Ig41'sT . • September 25 , 1990 Prellwitz Short Plat Soil Logs Soil Log # Description Lot 1 0-2" Loamy Type 4 2-22" Loamy Sand Type 3 23"+ Compacted silty loam Lot 2 0-3" Loamy Type 4 4-23" Loamy Sand Type 3 24"+ Silty sandy loam Lot 3 0-1 " Loamy Type 4 2-18" Loamy Sand Type 3 19"+ Compcated silty sand • . Lot 4 0-20" Loamy Sand Type 3 21 "+ Compacted silty sand • Legal : See Attached w:mo `• }11,P �,. . . . b1i EAST UIST r SERVICt CL�N`T\E.� ECM Pis V ra NOV 2 1990 • o% f > CITY )F R - NTON • Planning/Building/Public Works Department Earl Clymer, Mayor Lynn Guttmann, Administrator CITY OF REN T ON June 2 , 1993 REGC=IVED CITY CLERK'S OFflCE TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Subject: Several New Plats that have been Addressed Please see attached new plats that have just been addressed. Please add these addresses to your City directories and maps . Three plats attached - Prellwitz Short Plat, Stratford Place Plat, and Kenny Vue Plat. Sincerely, 4---)--L74• l/Jan Conklin Development Services Representative Development Services Division Telephone: 277-6176 4 #1:platadd 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 PRELL //ITZ SHORT PLAT SHORT PLAT NO. =— OF THE NE r 4 OF �� 1/4 SECTION 32, TOWNSHIP 24 NORTH, r„_40' RANGE 5 EAST, W.M. GRAPHIC SCALE CITY 'OF ;?EN TON, WASHINGTON I', ��K[ APPROVALS LR \ }0 \ :tiTiA5rfuvx'AMINED ANO APPROVCD RIIS_OAY Or 19_. A.D. I/tp_�je - ,o � SO CA,IS OF (CARING - XCAS DATI/M I \ S1T OlJ�J nJININC, UUILOI'0 &FTl-i617�T+l5RTc3�— r orfs:(/ AMlNCU ANDAPPR0IEC JIIlS_DAY Or f9� A.O. • SVNI O CW EALI£NTlION •N/ �r NI//ON rorALBUTTON 07aIAIOCC J \,c) •:�\ r11\'SPOTTION s A+�++�� . \ /\,,.___, ft, ( ., SECOND IN !RUMEN( „� • . S RVI.Y MEMO° •-0 i� 19_ A.D. / FIELD TI1A4E 'E MEII10 SET I/2 REDAR ,4 CAP o_,� '9\ EXAMINED AND APPROVED i)I1S DAY OF C n� / �',i �,� \ 11rA171f7�7 ,TiJITR .. 99. f0' Ls.s.,,,,s7,./7,....„,,,,,c5A2,4, \io' • 99.50' }pEXAMINED AND APPROVED CY KING COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ASSESSMENTS }d 1HIS_OAY OF 19_, A.D. ~lb 2 \\ • KING COUNTY ASSESSOR DEPUTY KING COUNTY ASSESSOR N h N•,�i. LZ CERnF]CATE . 1v—JN m / z1r N I (lIE) HEREBY CERTIFY THAT 1 AM (14E,AR£) PIE 011NER(S) IN JEE Z / 0., \ I \ SIMPLE OF THE LAND HEREBY PLAITED IN Ti/IS SHORT PUT. jLor 1 o O 9 La z \\ Z /!- 2i,.55 .q. II. O 23.9 •q N LOT 3 \'I )1\ \ ONIJER ONNLR • 0.55 0 .S 4 acr l W lU h µ J'1 0; 23.1105 aqI .. . Il. 0� • � - - N FV 0..54 act as •t• (b ,,:n • . . o 1 /2 ncxNolti�EOGE NT ;� /� ��_ �`\ STATE OF WASHINGTON • 2 ,���y 7 / p .. r� COUNTY OF KING ) • %/1 !_' �(0 , 2 JD' \ EFORE ME, SrCORNER r, D r -Q i+fly IS TO CERTIFY THAT ON THIS_____DAY OF A.D.A0 19_� OF LOT 9, OCK 4 o4L� \ DIE UNDERSIGNED. A NOTARY PUBUC, PERSONALLY APPEARED L D.S R.C. i-" —�\ rr TO ME XNOIfN ro Cf THE INOIYI0UALS WHO SIGNED THE ABOVE J 777/ �— l CERTInCATE AND ACKNOIILEOCfD ro ME•1TJAT RIt;Y SIGNED TiHE SAME AS 1TJUR FREE _- -_ 99.57 _ __ _ _99..57__'y _ ..-49.i6' __ I\ \ VOLUNTARY ACT AND DEED. 7'T 290. O' r- / I IIINC55 MY NANO AND OJnCIAL SEAL THE 0A14 i1ND YEAR FIRST ADOYE RTTITTEN+. L �\ • i \ JO JO— \ , • NOTARY PUDUC IN AND FOR DIE \ 55 11' N 88'51.2 - IV '•1 •22 SEA TE,OF WASJIJNCTON,aRES/ORG �/ ./ J1B.77' IN Jo' NE J6 T7-1 TREE JO' Jo' • • 4EGdL2ESG6/E112N 6� —_FAST J�LIORJ/CR OF LCCCNO LOT 9. CLOCK 4. ICI.CMAN"S C.D.. L C IVASIIINC ON GARDEN pr rn -- > • ,( r.C(ION JJ- 4 5WEAL AREA - 1.6J ACRES TOUIrfA ENGINEERS • IVLUME 16 7, ACCORDINGTS'PAGE 1 ME R S Or£KlE v-, R£cor( IN (9/24/91 ) PROPOSED LOIS - J LOTS L1XUME 16 OF PLATS 18, REC ROS OF KlI C COUNTY(N:lS1I1.'G(OJT. 13666 o'.,1 V.0.7 Jler•SMIU. YA 16166 (id)/33-,100 RECORDING CERRRCAIT. suRvcnx+s crRnncArr if o.a.n by Or Cn.c •d by xo (f': r ;• _ HEED rOR RECORO TIIIs___DAY a_�19.YR11:NAP CO'1RCCILY Rr.PR OlI/EC A SURVEY !;j .Ar,BADE 11Y NC On U1F I'? NI 011+CCPON IN IN COOT Or SURIEYS O'! Dra rin f/a. 6J9AC rJ.,�.�,.n.rr r.l Ir 'a1R1rY Rl f,CY+D!JIG ACT +, _- .. ,1.-nr Job No. 6J➢-001-➢01 .9 OK r xC- R J OttCR . ' . --• -- , I - I : -. :r.,.7.4."272:,s3:41::•• . . //.-/-. ./9/.62esq./sft.: .. .1!, •,.,r)7,2L202T s2q8. f I. • i... 7,222 sq. ft. 1= 1 17 acres • • • "..:'?O. .11 --acres .. . e , 72.4 7re / 1 - :.„...."...., • 7,221 sq. ft. 0.16 acg 0.16 acres fz. •:':::•0.16 acres/ *I. / (:). 1,./,‘ •••/' "../. ''r''7"-..--•-:-,,.t...S......,: ':.....--ie' I r. -11 4- • IN); . ZtZ ./// ----/ 1 I •/_1 . ...- , _..... L -z--. , __I, I_ :_._,t_s__ _ .... _.. _ ._ . ..y. "- ,71 --rd:„.„..._,... -........1 L....., \ __----N-00228---E---,150.04' I 2-- z 71.22' •••• • 71.22 ) 71.22' ...---''' --V- 74.-41 ,..,r.--- 4(.15.1.."-P7.9 • ., .9.,--- IIINI;p:-.11to. - 'ir •KT''' .- - , Z •e.. . • AO . /---- V. A 7 C7-‘• 7/Z. 7 .'61- 161. 4/-L K '4-1 .--- - - , N.,c- •N ' / g(---' 0 v Ati' • .508.71' 11' \ S 004.38 W /".. 7 Y V 7.- Y , / y/)° • Y -V , y ..-- . ,,,, c• .....---. , ,_.--- ,........7.... •\ • _ Thy-• 8 .60'./Z Z Z___(32 cf".‘ / 57 . 59.42' 'zii.1..A.2.',.: \ 22.64' 79.44' / / Z'S- ' 8 .0 0' / / ./H4;/"--,,V 1% . --ep / / r. - 1.1 ----- 4P. r_ ' /.. ,-../67‘--7--1 1--- / 17Z / ,r--, , - , --- • _ i ,. L0 r ..".- Sb r 1 . --- f-.-% -- - -1\ . I N'"‘-'-/ -1 /r / / ,Lcir ,Iv y.1/ I y LO, 5 / 7 1,01-/65-51/9. , ,.---- .L.LI ,56,1 16 ( - (K.,19 LOT\I . ./1 Z • 8•094/s/q. fl./ , / 8,094 sq. ft. ,/j, y 8,3-63/sq//ft. iz's• / ..-- IN ti "----''',., 8,461 sq. fi.\ .... I 206 s, t. I •,'.--/-.47 scl• 11 ' •'-o4, O. 8 acres." I (cl, C.18 0(7 I 4, .0.1 9>a cr7/ N: ' r\ 1-0.19 acres' \c, I 0\16 ac.reI .. ..):..z2 0.1 83crV(./ _. /c ...- Pq) Gs/ ' •••••••- '..) \ I- _ ri,z,- 1 i •tl \\ \ .,2. ., 1 (. / /ir /// //7, ril _i 1. \ I- • t,1 .N• . \_ J , L :___ L___\_ . i ,01-rj. / ii / / N -- I -\ \\ I / N\ y,..3,--__: / : / / I vtt___./ __. , ____ ....„. , , ..., 80.00\ 71.22 N 22.64: 76.08' . ) /ill / /71//8.yoo j _._ -\1-55 -4-'-- \ - -- -\ s\ PREVIOUS PROP uNij / . -1- tY L ..., ,5,.„II ..__ L01. N \ \ i\ .6: .. . ..) . ,c.,,' . ., _ _ __ _ , - . ---- i-4/7 / /1- -1/1/1/- 7zi,.. - v) ) _ LOT --.90\1 oq.resf\ \ \. Ik '). • 1 ..„\v.. )./- c?...,, ;6.- 7,692 s'q. Z ,V. // 1771.8 41 1.1 0.17 tcres0yr, //V :Lig acres , 7,21 1 , \ -/---- / ''>/,/ ///7/// .r,-- ,. /-7- ,...,.. --‘N,56.'4&A---\• .--\-1\ \NL, . ',, 1 ./, 4.'6• / ..t'.-6 \ •<9- L'-'" •-•„, ---..1- • 4N.:.../_.. .., --- R - 75' i i )• i• L _ 6/4-.-.3L , ,--Z- NN- --------- -_ LOT_ 12„ ..\\T. • No, .1.--- -__2.a ,.s.,-IA,./3---•______ 0...q.5•\sl.,f1.\ N. cz•!1. .\\ 1\0.17 acreik >6 .,! ,,,, // / . iN, /---6. ---- / v - • / i '----.Q.29\acres \‘,.. \ •, IN N). , ----.. N NNN\. NI - . \ . ''--L-_-] •-e; - •'. 7/._./t/eXif&vc/ri . ,,,,d .. . rd --0,-0,„ .-1---__ ----N N , N \ \ \ \ --- 13:.f703. / _ _ ...,..,-u, ........ R -) c .4 /A /----e'. tc' \\ N \ ). --- - - - ---1 - • / y43,".,w 1 7 4.95' -...._, ---- i- -----,..N\ \\ \ I\\\ N-L-Q1. 14 -- .--•'' /4 (..-- . • ,--- L,‘. ,d/- 7 V117/./077 71794. • _..55'___7L-•-. .. _.\ \ /I°,‘....Y NX >, •-•__ -------- ' ,---- `-'0, - -, / vli -74>J6'- ---7L-7--66•21 i,(3.1 /tx.-I/L 0 T i 6 0.21 cres . • Z 1 1 yO. '0 3 Acre: .-i._ -7.- -, ' \-- - I.\ '''• '---1-----„,_: ,,,''1 ,, •'..-. )e• CC A.' 7 -=,-::---:-,....:- ,,,.\ \ ' . . 01/ 1 \ \„,N, ', N, s'• -..'--,• '-- ..--...")1 ql- ..-7,82,2 sqf • I 4\ ( \7</ ...„, ..-/ . • I \\ \ _J L _ „ -I -(--- ( i /-*/. .---------------.„ 's\ N. '-.... s'-'56•68C -....- ---;---rii...----'.-- 0,7/6.crds2 ,i . , / .z \ ..., „ ___ .._ _,.._.-f-__ /, _ , N N-, -. N. . N . .,. -,.... • ----.-- .....-- .7 ,.. .... i I \ ( ( ( .....---------_. -,.. .,20.0;.. N ... . . ... .... ... . . _ . • • . ••• .• PP0/2 -96 ..• . ._.. ..... . • • �. r: '� _ NOO"3/'53"E • J30'S2 _`A e� S : . O Aba • _ 4 6EQOEEN . . CA - t pc . ..T. ,....,......,!: ...„,.....: . . . ••. •:,...• e.c,A.,c,,,,,:a_5. L71 -0 Cj•'K 1 cn. , ,,,,,„v /v.e_,_, _ /„. _ .i (0 > , ....,...:... •_, D U �0 S GI $j • (j\ i9 RI f v I I n:, • --t.) ... 6)... "It 11'. .-.,...., L:1,.J. l I tit:rn'. I zee,.3:J I r' _ i r.w :11,--"---2,-) ' Cc— ` ;..'. 0° •L U • III? ....-_ :.,:.. G.JGvr:.J.^ • l/< ti'V ,},., rr •`)V )•,"• 7 /7:21t$ Ott ;;1-:•; . Cr Ilr/ 'Q� V .� \ • I :.��J {F.jj,¢'�•YY � ..• C.:if l:•�•r' '•� .ram.-r .7/;" �/ t��O�.-��.10 � .... I /<l�-i: ;i ..•r..:. % • ,�. � ..��,�� ` .Q %�`t� .�y�r •I' il'�h t: ] a�'"Y:� �•q ��' • r:i'�'...• I: w `'' o � ;./•, ...'�!:• .(• �.., .�'!• --,i` I �i. ?I •�-r•^vS'• ? �- A-•:' ----'---' h �1 _rY. ::•.a•. • '• r �•' . I< . '4 rl�,..^ ' • ,,• \ `.�- z f c . n=`C.::-� / .J 1= \.-- I. .I` rr:,r ':i •✓ I-'',n .r1.:,. , i t� • 1 �. C9 _ • ,rv::nc. r i c.v '�.n; .,; p� . .•.,ry C31 iN ss �• O.a::..', zR.. �t'•`ate i�f.. ,' "t ;tea TCl m 0 'tic .�,9, .I -�_U h1i i. + ,` / cs. ��UO':72,07"L= / C7 •00' 2' r '> __ �.r L k:.',,.�, " �1•'. , :•' _{0;-' '„ ..:p�.•�•• ,,�p�y�,�•'�► Ci•:•.�'tt �t ji 't'Lg, � .: to 1., - M..+...••.e• �+�ts •,• <ial.. '�:7.- 3e,:ip S ilEllM+i t.�7 C:riifik<:,.:14';:6!) 0.041���j i�, ' ) 32'�J E • •: t• _ .-•r •��.�.... .1, .Rt;•�. ?.Is+ tis �. :;% .--_,a, ,,',. ;?,`.../0O 7 • ••4 ,. AA.,. •Tr.a� _,a .....pir ' +3T -r ...r -i I:r� ��``y��r.= • .r.'t'.... i,V.".pltt: •...-.cam, wp• Z44 it•.. •+ •ytiS._S:-:7.,. ....vetz.t.t.- //t9- IAA., :: +Y'� i' u 1°.�4-ti • : P •-:•• .' l{'r' • 1i'r*.' s,flt`r..••'e�:A :A:A•,w ...raid. .t. "§-•..:.,,, F:,,a.;__ •�i�' 4.�'p�yppfl =M '� .✓. •al' � �.Ss:+,. •,...IT:. L?�. ita•+ .-'�' .`•C %t- x �,f•••�• � -:-K:•: .f "'S_.':': - nh,;' • ,sx -T , � .mo,•,.. 1.....�1-.3• t}t•g e.g :,.i i;,. I: _ _ 1 ��, :r. �..r. ;O D:.r B;':s' e.!.9 h. '+t,'•"•s ri4a+) ! G r•`C:�' M"'• eS:: 'P. - .�, '�1rs'� •:,�, ul...:1;.:�`_ ":;+,:::+=� ��.. r7 �tl`,�.-t_� �� --{:�'F.•_ ..!'St.•?�����.�• ?�ri•�z.rllt�����pp....`..;.,«�� :3+Fi::- �7p t� ��+3�� � � � — _.i.'L"�• _ �t . . _.__ `7�`"" t �`•t4 . .�R� .1 1-7'T'•:i:::4f,• ,•�.• _ r-.eT. Y..it�, •si,', a r, �'c 1,� "' S2"dp!-.---- ..' '' !icy '"°.''. . � r �.•, .i _ -•:•:.:- :: C•y"., 0<<.11 � .59.,1]�',e!_ ;t` 1�741. ",v :., F':' .+ �r� i ,eko;.�".. l�t.,.� a t �w�•f�i:�::'..::;�>:� f 'a': � ?�5.7;• ::+- �., .a. �r•r..; ;'1.'• ,y� .t� ,� � ;i: ` ilVer -�:.a �:!'r�w r.t«,�.{ YJ ft,•;:?"r;7,t, c .: l�'ti t< '1>„t ~";Ze,;;!MS• .e�,ff„'•} •t, ,.R:t.+ r i�.. 'C..•t: .1c'i:..ai�': yih lwa .bpi::=,tt ':.t?:•yf...,/, �: 71:5."'''''''• tvi `," •c;:•. j ';.' =.+'i;'k'1:•: .'�-erp'+t�.:•;t;itf t,�'i•••y °.‘‘):. .y - .. . 1 .. tray%. •.iti::,:.:•:. •:i :,._{. ••• 0� r./ � la/ '►".. •-7/,7fS'"` - ,� - 7/ t. , ..,�,�itM r 1�t . t. t.:� ,i., :i:• T�',,77 �t • �: r .f 6 8 6 � / .?"--"AN, =J�r ��— � aa. "1 • ? �� " - rzr�� x we�I_'�" - -- -- „ _ :N. � �:� / •�' \ski �,° T • _ � y^e`er -� _� -� ., 1 -ll1. �4< ra. ,L.- -.., " t o r�!-�'r ., • �' 'S% Q• \ l,� -- � ! ' `• a .< :I.• �� � "'�I ' ide.. ,z,f � •� ro""�, -'`��T Z>- �... ,.2. , 't�'--. \� •ii J• C �.. . 19�•--`--.-c0 Ir `%,d "-•I'+ ie;{:';:... � !.! et:'..' l;Q �J iY�t V �y,_.'.--'""- 'S.•``:\.., • • • ?[ u :. •�n /r --t�•.•!it �ro �'ti,L�h1 _��.';,:,_u.<r:-S,_�_ -� • • F.�:J�'e.. • r .I:.:5.' .,:� j� _ A• �� , A l',, l-J'• , -- 2�'�.' - e..-n. < .:1.`y j t rn'r .. tl . • L.- U N''. b'r..r •.r. _.I'y j „,. u.vr / .i! 1•i, ':r:•;i% '4— :-�;,'• to:` zr:J� r �. ;Ib CITY _F RENTON Planning/Building/Public.Works Department . Earl Clymer, Mayor Lynn Guttmann,Administrator January 19, 1993 - • Mr. Douglas Prellwitz • 20335 SE 136 th Street Issaquah, WA 98027 SUBJECT: Conditions and Requirements for Completion of Prellwitz Short Plat, File No.SHPL-108-90 Dear Mr. Prellwitz: This letter is written at your request to clarify the status of your short plat approval and outline remaining items which must be completed before the City of Renton can allow recording of. the plat with King County. Project Chronology 1. On November 4, 1991, the Hearing Examiner approved the Preliminary Short Plat with conditions. 2. Following several appeal hearings by both the Hearing and City Council, the applicant and staff resolved the plat access issues. The resolved access was described in a memorandum to the Hearing Examiner dated August 21, 1992: a) The applicant is required to develop a 20 foot wide access road to serve the plat on Aberdeen Ave. NE. Because the fill for the access road could encroach on the adjacent private property to the east, the applicant will be required to dedicate an additional 20 feet of right-of-way on the west side of the existing right-of way. The new access road would be located five (5) feet from the western edge of the right-of-way. Note: if the applicant can provide engineering drawings showing that the fill for the access road would require less dedication, staff would consider approving such a reduction, with the Hearing Examiner's consent, prior to approving the revised plat for recording with King County. b) The turn around at the end of Aberdeen may be reduced to 40 feet instead of 60 feet. c) Because the City does not own sufficient right-of-way on NE 36th between Aberdeen and 112th PI., and because the ultimate grade of 36th cannot be designed at this time, transportation staff recommend that the off-site improvements on 36th be deferred by the Hearing Examiner, with the condition that the applicant be required to covenant the four lots to require participation in a future LID. Deferred improvements shall include: curb, gutter, sidewalk, street pavement and storm drainage. The covenants shall be submitted for approval prior to approval of the plat for recording with King County. This deferral would be granted, by the Hearing Examiner, with the condition that the applicant install a six (6) foot wide asphalt path with street lights along the entire NE 36th frontage of the property. Design of the street lights and path shall also be approved by the Development Services Division prior to approval of the plat for recording with King County. 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 THIS PAPER CONTAINS 50%RECYCLED MATERIAL.10%c POST CONSUMER • Mr. Douglas Prellwitz - 01/19/93 Page -2 d) The applicant is required to submit a revised plat plan for Development. Services Division and Transportation Systems Division approval, prior to recording the short plat with King County. 3. On September 29, 1992 the Hearing Examiner issued a letter reaffirming "its original decision approving the short plat subject to the modified access that has been approved by staff in correspondence dated August 21, 1992. 4. On November 10, 1992, the Board of Public Works reviewed an application for deferral of off- site improvements (curbs, gutters, sidewalks, street lighting, street paving), for the short plat. The Board granted the deferral conditioned upon the applicant agreeing to supply two street lights (one temporary) on the intersection pole and one within the plat. The approval was also granted subject to the applicant submitting a restrictive covenant for recording agreeing to participate in a future LID for off-site improvements (curbs, gutters; sidewalks, street lighting, street paving). 5. On December 4, 1992, the applicant submitted a revised Preliminary Plat plan for Development Services approval. - 6. Development Services Division has reviewed the revised Preliminary Plat plan and approved it in concept. Actions Necessary by Applicant for Public Works Issuance of Construction Permits for On-Site and Off-Site Improvements 1. The applicant must submit construction plans to the Public Works counter on the fourth floor of City Hall, for installation of required on-site and any off-site improvements which have not been deferred. 2. Along with the construction plans submittal, the applicant must also submit written conformation to Public Works of Seattle/King County Health Department approval of the plat, per the Hearing __ Examiner's Decision, dated November 4, 1991, Condition No. 1. 3. Once the construction plans have been approved by Public Works, the applicant will be given notification to install improvements in accordance with the Subdivision Ordinance. Section 9-12- 5 F discusses Installation of Improvements: "All improvements shall be installed according to the minimum standards of the City of Renton. The subdivider shall obtain all necessary permits and pay all fees and inspection costs. The various departments shall notify the Building Department when all improvements are satisfactorily installed according to Section 9-12-8W, Certificates of Completion. (Ord. 2667, 10-4-71; and. Ord. 2823, 1-21-74, eff. 1-30-74; Ord. 3592, 12-14-81)" 4. See attached memorandum from Neil Watts, Plan Review Supervisor, for list of required improvements which must be completed prior to final Public Works approval of the Short Plat. 6. If you have any questions regarding either the required improvements, plan requirements or Public Works review process, please call Neil Watts at 277-6178. Actions Necessary by Applicant for Final Plat Approval and Recording: 1. After received construction permits, the applicant installs all required on-site and off-site improvements. -Mr. Douglas Prellwitz - .. 01/19/93 2. :Following completion and inspection of required improvements,, the information listed below, - must be submitted in order for Public Works to review and approve the plat for recording. Please submit the following information to Laureen Nicolay at the City Hall Third Floor Counter. a)..Written confirmation from the Plan Review Supervisor,. Neil Watts, that all required improvements have been satisfactorily installed and/or"bonded"with an approved surety device, or an approved covenant, running with the land, has been executed for the LID. b). Provide 2 copies of written confirmation from the Land Use Compliance.Officer, Bob Arthur, that Hearing Examiner Condition No. 4, requiring a payment of$150.00/lot to the - City's Parks and Recreation Improvement Fund, has been complied with, along with a receipt from the Finance Department.. c) Provide-4 copies of the revised plat map incorporating items 12, 1;3, 14 described in Neil Watt's memo. Note: The plat map and mylar must conform to conditions attached by • the Hearing Examiner in his Decision dated November 4; 1991. [See Attached]. d)._Provide 4 copies of all proposed and/or required easements and/or covenants. . 3. If all clarifications have been made to the satisfaction of the commenting section, we will request the short plat mylar for final signatures. When the signatures have been.obtained, the City Clerk's Office will submit the plat to King County for recording (normally, within one week of receiving the signed mylar). . 4. You should be able to contact the County Recording Office (296-1842) within 4 days of the date the pat is delivered to the County to determine the recording number. You will ultimately receive a recorded copy of this document back from the County, but this generally takes several months. In any case, the lots and legal descriptions are legal upon the date of recording. I hope this letter answers your questions about short plat approval. If you have any additional questions, please call me at 277-6167. Sincerely, _. .. 0//), Paul D. Forsander . Project Manager . �'�:_ - Douglas Prellwitz -_ -; •. - . , ., - SHPL, V-108-90 . • :--November 4 1991.._.• .. g'9::• Page 9 . ._ _ .. . . .• --The-applicant's property appeais'cipe for'the variance requested: ::'`''"":.:"-- :.`":'"'••:`'"`..'.' `..", '•'•;•-.: :.-:•u--_.�. : ._ . 13: The applicant suffers undue hardship that results from the historic platting in•this area. "Early ', •'' platting of the area carved out large lots without accounting for access to public streets from ;• ;1 : interior portions of those lots. Many similar lots were created in the city in the early part of .. ; • - the century when:larger lots.were.preferred. The only reasonable way to achieve access to the • ,-.!;:.! interior portions of these lots are with short private roads. The nature of these roads, short and - ' :;:'i . narrow, precluded public ownership since upkeep would-be difficult and expensive. Under this. circumstance a private road provides a reasonable.alternative for access. .The applicant will ,•. . have to provide language on the face of the plat that requires each of the owners to maintain . :•J the private roadway subject to the approval of the city and provide the city with the option of `' • 1 maintaining the roadway and attaching a lien against the lots for costs incurred. 14. A private road developed as recommended by staff should not jeopardize the public health, • • safety or welfare, nor should it adversely affect private property. 15. The approval of this private road follows the standards set in this area'of the city where access to interior lots has-routinely been by private road. ,_ • DECISION .._...,._ ----• 3 The proposed 4-lot Short Plat is approved subject to the following conditions: • 1. • •The plat follows the general configuration of Exhibit #16,provided that lot lines.may be. -. • - - _ - shifted-to provide'reasonable square footage for each of the lots and the alterations are _ ._-_ i • approved by staff and are limited to the minimum necessary to provide Health Department approval of a septic system for the plat. 2. The Health Department provides approval of the plat in writing,prior to the recording of the short plat mylar: , , . -• . • 3. The applicant shall include language on the face of the plat that requires each of the . • owners to maintain the private roadway subject to the-approval of the city and provide ,_ • : .1 the city with the option of maintaining the roadway and attaching a lien against the lots • for costs incurred. . ' - i 4. The applicant shall pay $150 per home for a total of$600.00 to offset the impacts on the city's park system. . 5. The applicant shall include language on the face of the plat that requires the homes to . • connect to any sewer that may become available within 500 feet of the plat. Each of the -homes in the plat shall be equipped with a dry sewer and appropriate easements for •1 gravity sewer lines. ' • 6. . The applicant shall be required to provide a tree cutting plan that complies with city • ••' regulations. Tree removal shall be subject to review and approval of staff as provided by the-city regulations. _ • . . __ , 7. The private roadway shall be subject to the approval of staff and particularly the Fire ' Department and shall run:east-west from Aberdeen Avenue N.E. at a location • . approximately 90 feet north of N.E. 36th Street.. ' - • 8. The applicant shall develop Aberdeen Avenue N:E. as approved by staff and subject to' . - . - -:. review and.approval.of the Fire-Department. . . _ 9. The'applicant shall dedicate the easternmost 20 feet of the subject site for the widening • • • f of Aberdeen Avenue N.E. subject to the review and approval of city staff. . •• • •• - 10. In the event that the health department disapproves of the septic system on the lots • approved under this decision, the applicant may reduce the plat to three (3) lots subject • to the same general requirements already set forth herein. ORDERED THIS 4th day of November, 1991. : —1—::-94 6-4:4__ _. . FRED J. KAUFMAN I • ,. 1.l. i -17 :. - . . . .CITY:OFRENTON-_ PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT. ".4: MEMORANDUM DATE: JANUARY 12, 1993 TO: _ LAUREEN NICOLAY FROM: NEIL WATTS /U/-'{J _ SUBJECT: FILE#SHPL-108-90 -PRELLWITZ SHORT PLAT This particular short plat has received preliminary approval from the Hearing Examiner and a deferral from the BPW for a portion of the street improvements. No further action has been taken by the applicant to comply with the utility and transportation requirements for the proposed short - plat. The items which must be completed prior to our recommending approval of the final short _ ___ plat are as follows: 1. Extend an 8" water main froth Aberdeen Ave NE westward along NE 36th Street to the east - -Property line. 2. Show location of existing fire hydrants. All residences must be within 300 feet of a fire hydrant measured along the pavement. • 3. Provide water meters for each lot, to be located in either City right-of-way or within easements on private property, and not in pavement areas. 4. Subject to development fees, per attached fee sheet. • 5. Provide "dry" 8" sanitary sewer mains along Aberdeen Ave NE and NE 36th street property frontages per City of Renton standards,and specifications. 6. Label minimum finished floor elevations on face of plat. - 7. Construct private roadway in Aberdeen Ave NE to provide access to-the proposed lots. 8. Provide a drainage control plan for the private roadway/turnaround per King County Surface Water Manual. 9. Provide 2 street lights as required by the Board of Public Works. 10. Provide a 6' wide asphalt path along the property line in NE 36th Street. JANUARY 12, 1993 '.:: 2. -.. - _ - _ -_ - . .. . .----- •---- .. - : - -. -.- -- -- - - .., _. • 11.;Provide a covenant to participate in a future LID for..street improvements, to apply for all 4 new lots. 12. Provide language on the face of the plat which prohibits direct road access to NE 36th Street ' = or Aberdeen Ave NE by any of the resulting-lots. 13. Include language on the face of the plat that requires the homes to connect to any sewer that may become available within 500 feet of the plat. 14. Include language on the plat that requires each of the owners to maintain the private roadway subject to the approval of the City and provide the City with the option of maintaining the - roadway and attaching a lien against the lots for costs incurred. 15. The indicated utility and transportation improvements for this short plat require an engineered drawing prepared according City of Renton standards by a registered Civil Engineer. These construction plans must be submitted to the Plan Review Section (4th floor counter), along with a construction permit application, cost data inventory and permit fees. Once the plans are approved, a construction permit must be obtained --including permit fees, bonding and — water SUCC fees. The improvements must be constructed and accepted by the City (including as-built plans, etc.)prior to recommendation of approval for this short plat. l CITY OF RENTON MEMORANDUM DATE: January 5, 1993 TO: Neil Watts, Plan Review Supervisor FRO • Laureen Nicolay,Associate Planner Extension#5594 SUB CT: File#SHPL-108-90----Prellwitz Short Plat Attached is the most recent revision of the above-referenced short plat for your final review. Please check this document to ensure that all utility and transportation-related concerns have been addressed. If all your concerns have been addressed and you are now able to recommend recording of this plat, please initial this memo below and return to me. However, if you have outstanding concerns or require additional information in order for property management to recommend approval/recording of this plat, please send a written summary at your earliest convenience. Thank you. Approval recommended: Name Date cc: Project Manager--Paul Forsander White File Yellow File CITY OF RENTON MEMORANDUM DATE: January 5, 1993 TO: Neil Watts, Plan Review Supervisor yosi FRO • �Laureen Nicolay,.Associate Planner Extension #5594 SUB CT: File #SHPL-108-90----Prellwitz Short Plat Attached is the most recent revision of the above-referenced short plat for your final review. Please check this document to ensure that all utility and transportation-related concerns have been addressed. If all your concerns have been addressed and you are now able to recommend recording of this plat, please initial this memo below and return to me. However, if you have outstanding concerns or require additional information in order for property management to recommend approval/recording of this plat, please send a written summary at your earliest convenience. Thank you. Approval recommended: Name Date • cc: Project Manager--Paul Forsander White File tyettow File 1 5=2;. ,1?3 CITY Vr RENTON x y7 < ,. fz2 h NAIL Hearing Examiner Fred J.Kaufman Earl Clymer, Mayor a CITY OF RENTON 1 SEP 2 91992 September 29, 1992 v v ',it maws officE Douglas Prellwitz 20335 SE 136th Street Issaquah, WA 98027 Re: Prellwitz Short Plat #SHPL-108-90 Dear Mr. Prellwitz: This office has reviewed the correspondence regarding the above referenced matter. It appears that staff and the applicant have reached an agreement that allows reasonable access to the proposed lots of the proposed plat that meets the concerns of the Fire Department and also meets or exceeds the minimum standards of the subdivision regulations. Therefore, this office reaffirms its original decision approving the short plat subject to the modified access that has been approved by staff in correspondence dated August 21, 1992. This office is not empowered to grant deferrals and any request for same will have to be presented to the Board of Public Works. This office makes no recommendation on whether a deferral is warranted and the Board of Public Works is entirely free to determine whether one is warranted or not. This determination is subject to the normal appeal and reconsideration periods. This decision shall be final within 14 days of its issuance if there is no appeal or request for reconsideration. If this office can be of further assistance, please feel free to write. Sincerely, c.1� 1 etudt----' FRED J. KAUFMAN faA.— HEARING EXAMINER FJK:wmb cc: Gary Gotti Larry Warren Don Erickson Mark Pywell Paul Forsander ... . • nnnrc /'lilt-\ '11C_'1C(11 ' p[ 00\��Q[Vu*m�»� m� --- CITY OF-RBU|DN _ ��� ���~ � ��� ����� � � ���� = n w��� ^^�~^ , , ~~~� ~�mu Y o�� �� &�y�n - aK ���3��`-������� September 17* 1',�',"^U�0 mm������m � ���� _~�=���� Dear Mr. Kaufman: I am writing in response to the memo I received dated 9-21-92 regarding the PrelIwitz Short Plat SHPL,V-108-90. I 'm in agreement with the revised recommendations with exception of no.3 on street lighting. After discussions with Paul Forsander we came to agreement on the installation of one steeetlight mounted on the existing power pole at the ` intersection of NE 36th ST and Aberdeen AVE NE. ` , Your expedience in bring this plat to final approval / would be greatly appreciated. Sincerely, ` Doug PrelIwitz �==- ' MEMORANDUM DATE: September 17, 1992 TO: Paul Forsander FROM: Fred J. Kaufman SUBJECT: Prellwitz • As per our phone conversation, you were going to get the applicant to respond with their agreement to the proposed resolution prior to my issuance of a decision in this matter. __ - . • _ .. A;),$>.1 Oj 4o 1be -40 it Oit u Is 49/CITY OF RENTON 'Nr F9 !, MEMORANDUM DATE: August 21, 1992 TO: Fred Kaufman C(EFROM: Don Erickson STAFF CONTACT: Paul Forsander SUBJECT: Resolution of Prellwitz Short Plat Appeal file no.SHPL,V-108-90 The purpose of this memo is to report the result of staffs efforts to work with the applicant to resolve the access and off-site improvement•issues, which were appealed to Council in November, 1991. We believe that the recommendations contained in this memo will allow you to issue a revised decision finally resolving the applicant's appeal by approving the short plat with staff recommended changes.. Background The Planning and Development Committee heard the appeal and remanded the matter back to your office on December 17, 1992. The committee recommended that additional information be prepared and included in the official file for use by the Hearing Examiner, should the matter come back before the City Council on further appeal. Over the last several months the applicant's engineer, Tom Touma, has attempted to resolve the technical issues of grade and sight distance with Clint Morgan without sucess. As a result, Jim Hanson asked Mel Wilson to reexamine the problem and come up with a revised recommendation for the plat access. On August 10, 1992 transportation staff met with Jim and Paul to discuss the staffs revised access proposal. On August. 11th, Paul met with Doug Prellwitz to explain staffs proposal. On August 17th, Doug Prellwitz called Paul Forsander to let him know that the revised staff proposal would be acceptable. Recommendation Staff recommend that the Hearing Examiner issue a revised decision approving the short plat request with the following revisions[See attached sketch]: 1. The applicant is required to develop a 20 foot wide access road to serve the plat on Aberdeen Ave. NE. Because the fill for the access road could encroach on the adjacent private property to the east, the applicant will be required to dedicate an additional 20 feet of right-of-way on the west side of the existing right-ofway. The new access road would be located five (5) feet from the western edge of the right-of-way. Note: if the applicant can provide engineering drawings showing that the fill for the access road would require less dedication, staff would consider approving such a reduction, with the Hearing Examiner's consent, prior to approving the revised plat for recording with King County. f Memo to Fred Kaufman - • Prellwitz Short Plat August 21, 1992 Page2 2. The turn around at the end,of Aberdeen may be reduced to 40 feet instead of 60 feet. 3. Because the City does not own sufficient right-of-way on NE 36th between Aberdeen and 112th PI., and because the ultimate grade of 36th cannot be designed at this time, transportation staff recommend that the off-site improvements on 36th be deferred by the Hearing Examiner, with the condition that the applicant be required to covenant the four lots to require participation in a future LID. Deferred improvements shall include: curb, gutter, sidewalk, street pavement and storm drainage. The covenants shall be submitted for approval prior to approval of the plat for recording with King County. This deferral would be granted, by the Hearing Examiner, with the condtion that the applicant install a six (6) foot wide asphalt path with street lights along the entire NE 36th frontage of the property. Design of the street lights and path shall also be approved by the Development Services Division prior to approval of.the plat for recording with King County. 4. The applicant is required to submit a revised plat plan for Development Services Division and Transportation Systems Division approval, prior to recording the short plat with King County. Let us know if you need additional information with which to make your decision. Also let us know if you will need to reopen the hearing prior to your decision. As discussed above, both transportation staff and the applicant are satisfied with the revised access proposal. Thank you CC: Doug Prellwitz • Tom Touma Jim Hanson Mel Wilson Clint Morgan Paul Forsander • kaufmanl/dke/pdf ' . - \,. • • .. 1 iwrri , . . , .., ' • - ./e.Y/4 ' - ::;.‘ .' 1 ...)11. (4/14461(11.417° ..__R.ii..f.A11.°1 _ -. .. ___ ... -,....----------.,-. 0:4 00.01 1 014.00.. . .• A I* /*i OW 0 04'0 "Per, Iiftl>4.14444L_ . . . . • . \ • . la \, :. • 1 zo ot/ -/0,0=t/ 0/- oilt5iof-ricI/14: d__, .. . . . 4 .0 el oil orpy4/4-01.47 - . •. 4.7 i . . freill.oee el#0.- . .., . . . • . . ... . . . . ---„„,.._ , _. .:11—• . .: . . .......... i ;ro 40 _ • .______........._____.... ..._____ ________ 1-----7" -T7—B-""-': ' • . ' :'. . .'....:.. ' "I - . _ I. 1 • .E. , . . • . I. . i I. • ; . 1 1 . . \ \ \ ,. . • . . .. . I . : • i;. . . • • • . . . . . • . 1:-.,.j:.;,, . . . . • .- . . . . • ,:e • . . . . . . . . .. . •..•..•- ,• • • • •.. '. \ ' . . .. . .' • '. .•,•• ... ..• , ' •-. ,,. . • • - _ ..-. ' . . • - • •T • ": ' 1 . \ . . .. WM.--in•MIMIIMMIEN. MEW 1.180.11.11, • . . . . . . . : -----"/.• : / rr, „.. , r- I rio • • • , ... . • _ , ifl" ...:;/,' •*:!' . ... j'*/._)//. - f ell.jr-122 •U')/ V ; .-. • - • . . • . ,. • - . .. i . •.j-•" - .. . . - . _ -•.• ) .111101211111 : •._ • - •1.../ , ,' .•/7 - . . . ‘ • .:: . .• . _ .... ._. . ..- •• .. , • .L'g'9'45- :. - . . . . . . . .7 • • . . . . . . . .. . .'_ •. . • i . . . . . . '• • . • . . . .. . . ' . •. . .. . • ,.,, - Ille, .• . _ ____1__L• [. • L ........ ___.,.-_ __.-_..:._. ___ . . . P71 . • . . • . I. . . . • . . .. 1 ... ,., '' • CP..1774:1:2) :. , . 1 /1(:ei:)4. • • . .• . . i . . .., • ... . . . • 01. • : . ' ;:i. .- - - . \ ,. .. ... • ....:. . , . . ,, . . . . ,. . .. . . • . .... . . , . ;, . .. _ . ... . . • :. 00 . . • ... . .•.. , . . ....• . . . • . . .‘.:- -' . '... -.:-. . . . . . ..:.:. , . . • . . . . . ... • . ...... .,.... . . , ... . . . . . . . . •.. . . . ..._ . . . . .. .. . . . . _ . . .. . . . •.: . . „.. . : . . . . . . • . •.... , . , ..... . ., • . • . • ,. : ... . . , . . ., • . . .„ ... .., .. . . . • . .._..... ...• ___________._ • . . . . . ,.. ., • . : .. •.. . . . . .. . . . . . . . .._...., • . 1 • , .. . , a . . • ''....... /.. -. . ............01. ONIMMIIMMIEMEMISO '!"... 0 . 010°"""Wilia liffMphei"."..././Nia..--.7.'.--'---' ' ' ' . ' f . . . , ......... ., ............. . . . . .. .. .....- •. . . . . , . . . . . I • .-.--. , ,-----1- .• :1.,-....-...- ---Wei:o2---. - '7,0..!°°.°..-.- -.....,-...-_,--......_.„-...---.... --.,..-.......-..-............--,-...-- ....._ . \ • I . '..0,41145rt' ." t,Filksi 144r , .. ..., . . A . ...-....-- . __...._...... • • • . .. - . . • . . . . . . . . ,. . . .. . . . • . . .. .'.• -•..... :• • • .-.. . :.... .• 2 .. . • . . . • ".• • , ,• . . . . .. . . . . . ... • • . . . . . CITY -3F RENT ON era Planning/Building/Public Works Department Earl Clymer, Mayor Lynn Guttman,Administrator May 28, 1992 Mr. Mounir Touma, PE J3 15668 West Valley Highway Seattle, WA. 98188 SUBJECT: PRELLWITZ SHORT PLAT/ SHPL-108-90 Dear Mr Touma: I have reviewed the roadway center line profile drawings for N. 36th Street submitted May 11, 1992. It is my observation from your drawing that the street safety factors and sight distance problems on N. 36th Street cannot be properly addressed at this time with half street improvements. The roadway vertical curve, if cut approximately 11-ft. full width of roadway as shown on your profile drawing, would solve the sight distance problem. However, the proposed rockery cannot exceed 8-ft. in height per city policy. To exceed this would require a structured reinforced concrete retaining wall or a proper slope above the 8-ft. rockery. Secondly, the retaining wall or rockery would have to be located outside the public right- of-way on slope easements. This would impact the property opposite your proposed development and the triangular property to the east. Slope easements would have to be acquired from these separate property owners. Another negative factor not previously mentioned regarding access to the property is that the first 136-ft. of N. 36th Street from west of 112th Pl. is very narrow with hardly enough room for two cars to pass. Added to the problem which you indicated, is that the existing roadway is not built off the right-of-way center line. It should also be noted that the proper sight distance from our previously proposed access at Aberdeen Ave. NE cannot be obtained on the existing center line roadway profile without a cut in the roadway vertical curve also. I have looked closely for a practical solution that this office could support. However, I feel there remain too,many problems yet to be resolved before I can fully support this proposal. Sincerely, Clinton E. Morgan Development Services Division cc: Jim Hanson Gregg Zimmerman Paul Forsander 92CEM080 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 410- r CITY -JF RENTON "LL '�` Finance Department Earl Clymer;°Mayor Dan Clements,Director December 17, 1991 Mr. Douglas Prellwitz , 20335 SE 136th Street Issaquah, WA 98027 Re: Prellwitz Short Plat Appeal, Sh. Pl. 108-90 Dear Mr. Prellwitz: At the regular Council meeting of December 16, 1991, the Renton City Council remanded the referenced matter to the hearing examiner for further development of the factual record. The appeal pertains to issues of sight distance for the driveways and the degree of cross slope for the driveway if located as recommended by staff and the hearing examiner. As noted in the attached report, staff will provide additional information to the hearing examiner to be included in the official file. The Council also recommended waiver of the appeal filing fee should the matter be appealed following issuance of the second decision by the hearing examiner. Please feel free to call if I can provide further assistance. Sincerely, • Marilyn J. t s , CMC City Clerk • 235-2502 cc: Mayor Earl Clymer Council President Kathy Keolker-Wheeler Don Erickson, Principal Planner Fred Kaufman, Hearing Examiner 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2558 December 16. 1991 --- Renton City Council Minutes - Page 415 Ms. Guttmann further stated that the Planning/Building/Public Works Department recommended that: 1) The property owner be notified of the usage occurring and pdsiible loss of the land through adverse possession if due process is not taken; and 2) The garbage collector franchise be notified that the trail is not a right- of-way and cease using the property for access. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY ZIMMERMAN, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATION. CARRIED. Utility: 1992 Rate In response to Councilman Stredicke's inquiry, Administrator Guttmann said Increase that the 1992 Budget includes $212,000 for the plastics and multifamily recycling programs, which includes payment to the contractor, bin costs, education costs, and printing expenses. Speaking against the utility rate increase, Councilman Stredicke said that rates are rising too rapidly. He stated further that instead of increasing rates, the City should implement new programs only as funds are available; and he proposed a 3 percent rate reduction. Planning & Development Referred 11/25/91 - Planning and Development Committee Chairman Committee Mathews presented a report stating that the Committee met regarding the Appeal: Prellwitz Short Prellwitz appeal on short plat and variance (SHPL, V-108-90) on 12/12/91. Plat, NE 36th Street This appeal turns on issues of sight distance for the driveways and the degree (SHP-108-90) of cross slope for the driveway should it be placed where the examiner and City staff recommend. The Committee recommended that the City Council remand this matter to the Hearing Examiner for further development of the factual record. The Examiner could then modify his decision, if he deems it appropriate. The Committee recommended that the Hearing Examiner be provided with the following information, and that it be included in the official file should this matter come back before the Council on further appeal. 1) A map showing the street right-of-way of NE 36th Street and the actual developed roadway width. 2) A topographical map of the property, NE 36th Street down to at least 112th Place and the extension of Aberdeen Avenue NE proposed by staff. 3) Sight-line calculations for the entry driveway, both as proposed by the • applicant and by the City. 4) A map locating the exact points from and to which sight-line calculations have been performed. 5) An area map covering a larger area so that Lincoln Avenue, 112th Place, and the extensions of Aberdeen Avenue, as they relate to one another, would be shown on that map. 6) A report determining whether or not Aberdeen Avenue NE, if extended, could be used both by the Prellwitz parcel and by the triangular parcel located to the west of the Prellwitz parcel. 7) A report discussing the possibility of vacation of Aberdeen Avenue NE adjacent to the Prellwitz parcel. Should this matter come back before the Planning and Development Committee on re-appeal, the Committee recommended that the filing fee for appeal be waived. MOVED BY MATHEWS, SECONDED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS Ways & Means Ways and Means Committee Chairman Stredicke presented the following Committee ordinances for second and final reading: Ordinance #4335 An ordinance was read: Budget: 1992 1) Adopting the annual budget for the year 1992 in the total balanced amount of $101,624,688; 2) Adopting the additional 1/4 percent real estate excise tax; 3) Amending Section 5-5-3(C)7 of Chapter 5, Business Licenses; ` � I • APPOVo 1 PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE I COMMITTEE REPORT December 16, 1991 Prellwitz Appeal - Short Plat and Variance (SHPL, V-108-90) (Referred 11/25/91) The Planning and Development Committee met on this topic on December 12, 1991 . This appeal turns' on issues of sight distance for the driveways and' the degree of cross slope for the driveway should it be placed where the examiner and city staff recommend its placement. The Planning and Development Committee. recommends that the city council remand this matter to the hearing examiner for further development of the factual record. The examiner could then modify his decision, if he deems it appropriate . The Planning and Development Committee recommends that the hearing examiner be provided with the following information and that it be included in the official file should this matter come back before the city council on further appeal . 1 . A map showing the street right-of-way of N.E . 36th Street and the actual developed roadway width. 2 . A topographical. map of the property, N.E . 36th Street down to at least 112th Place and the extension of Aberdeen Avenue N.E . proposed by staff . 3 . Sight line calculations for the entry driveway, both as proposed by the applicant and by the city. 4 . A map locating the exact points from and to which sight line calculations have been performed. 5 . An area map covering a larger area so that Lincoln Avenue, 112th Place and the extensions of Aberdeen Avenue, as they relate to one another, would be shown on that map . 6 . A report determining whether or not Aberdeen Avenue N.E . , if extended, could be used both by the Prellwitz parcel and by the triangular parcel located to the west of the Prellwitz parcel . 7 . A report discussing the possibility of vacation of Aberdeen Avenue N.E . adjacent to the Prellwitz parcel . Copy:. Don Erickson Planning and Develop it Committee .Report - 2 Should this matter come back before the Planning and Development Committee on reappeal, the committee would recommend that the filing fee for appeal be waived. 17 Ma&LO5 Nancy Mathews, Chair Bob Edwards, Vice-Chair 16-64-0A -GO 17-0-Q-S2P--\___., Kathy Keo k r-Wheeler, Member . CITY9 : 16 :as . `'' ` CIT1 OF RENTON v Planning/Building/Public Works Department Earl Clymer, Mayor Lynn Guttmann,Administrator December 18, 1991 CITY OF RENIO$ DEC 2 ° 199'i Doug Prellwitz GLEE 20335 SE 136th Street c:f,YY Issaquah, WA 98027 SUBJECT: Prellwitz Short Plat Appeal Referral Back To Hearing Examiner For Reconsideration Shpl,V-108-90 Dear Doug: As you are aware, the City Council's Planning and Development Committee report of December 16, 1991 referred the Prellwitz Short Plat back to the Hearing Examiner for reconsideration. The committee recommended that additional information be prepared and included in the official file for use by the Hearing Examiner and should the matter come back before the City Council on further appeal. Before this matter goes back to the Hearing Examiner in early January 1992, staff would like to work with you and your engineer to resolve the technical issues regarding plat access and sight distance problems. For example, with additional technical information on topography and design engineering, it may be possible for the applicant to show that in grading N.E. 36th for full street improvements the existing sight distance problem could be eliminated. If the sight distance problem can be resolved and the improved 36th also provides for future extension of Aberdeen Avenue N.E. to the south, staff could likely support the applicant's proposed plat access. I have attached a copy of the Planning and Development Committee Report dated December 16, 1991 along with staff's analysis of the information requested along with recommended responsibilities. After you and Tom Touma have had a chance to review this information, I would be happy to meet with both of you to discuss this matter. We look forward to working with you and Tom in resolving this matter before taking it back to the Hearing Examiner. If you have any questions please call me at 277-6167. Sincerely, /*/ Paul Forsander, Senior Planner Attachments cc: Don Erickson,Zoning Administrator ,Jim Hanson,Manager Development Services Division Clint Morgan,Transportation Systems Division DOUG1 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 `! CIT ._ OF RENTON "LL = Planning/Building/Public Works Department Earl Clymer, Mayor Lynn Guttmann,Administrator December 18, 1991 Tom Touma 15668 West Valley Hwy Seattle,WA 98188 SUBJECT: Prellwitz Short Plat Appeal Referral Back To Hearing Examiner For Reconsideration Shpl,V-108-90 Dear Mr.Touma: As you are aware, the City Council's Planning and Development Committee report of December 16, 1991 referred the Prellwitz Short Plat back to the Hearing Examiner for reconsideration. The committee recommended that additional information be prepared and included in the official file for use by the Hearing Examiner and should the matter come back before the City Council on further appeal. Before this matter goes back to the Hearing Examiner in early January 1992, staff would like to work with the applicant to resolve the technical issues regarding plat access and sight distance problems. For example, with additional technical information on topography and design engineering, it may be possible for the applicant to show that in grading N.E. 36th for full street improvements the existing sight distance problem could be eliminated. If the sight distance problem can be resolved and the improved 36th also provides for future extension of Aberdeen Avenue N.E. to the south, staff could likely support the applicant's proposed plat access. I have attached a copy of the Planning and Development Committee Report dated, December 16, 1991 along with staff's analysis of the information requested along with recommended responsibilities. After you and Doug Prellwitz have had a chance to review this information, I would be happy to meet with both of you to discuss this matter. We look forward to working with you and Doug in resolving this matter before taking it back to the Hearing Examiner. If you have any questions please call me at 277-6167. Sincerely, gW/ Paul Forsander, Senior Planner Attachments cc: Don Erickson,Zoning Administrator Jim Hanson,Manager Development Services Division Clint Morgan,Transportation Systems Division • TOUMAI 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 APPROVED 9/ / ,, PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE dr COMMITTEE REPORT pLAWNG n1VISICN r T•.: r;= PEN T ON December 16, 1991 DECE '1 ,' -v 1 Prellwitz Appeal - Short Plat and Variance (SHPL, V. 1-'08=9O)t -" (Referred 11/25/91) The Planning and Development Committee met on this topic on December 12 , 1991 . This appeal turns on issues of sight distance for the driveways and the degree of cross slope for the driveway should it be placed where the examiner and. city staff recommend its placement. The Planning and Development Committee recommends that the city council remand this matter to the hearing examiner for further development of the factual record. The examiner could then modify his decision, if he deems it appropriate. The Planning and Development Committee recommends that the hearing examiner be provided with the following information and that it be included in the official file should this matter come back before the city council on further appeal. 1 . A map showing the street right-of-way of N.E. 36th Street and the actual developed roadway width. 2 . A topographical map of the property, N.E. 36th Street down to at least 112th Place and the extension of Aberdeen Avenue N.E. proposed by staff. 3 . Sight line calculations for the entry driveway, both as proposed by the applicant and by the city. 4 . A map locating the exact points from and to which sight line calculations have been performed. 5 . An area map covering a larger area so that Lincoln Avenue, 112th Place and the extensions of Aberdeen Avenue, as they relate to one another, would be shown on that map. 6 . A report determining whether or not Aberdeen Avenue N.E . , if extended, could be used both by the Prellwitz parcel and by the triangular parcel located to the west of the Prellwitz parcel . 7 . A report discussing the possibility of vacation of Aberdeen Avenue N.E. adjacent to the Prellwitz parcel. Copy: Don Erickson Planning and DevelopT,-,rt Committee .Report - 2 Should this matter come back before the Planning and Development Committee on reappeal, the committee would recommend that the filing fee for appeal be waived. (144/C2( MalfeGL;5 Nancy Ma,, hews, Chair Ai445 i7.'' Bob Edwards, Vice-Chair 471Cd PAO\—1)-) ickS)- --Qe-- __ Kathy Keo�lker-Wheeler, Member CITY9 : 16 :as . CITY OF RENTON MEMORANDUM DATE: December 18, 1991 TO: Jim Hanson, Manager Development Services Division. Clint Morgan,Transportation Systems Division FROM: on Erickson, Zoning Administrator STAFF CONTACT: Paul Forsander SUBJECT: Prellwitz Short Plat Appeal Referral Back To Hearing Examiner For Reconsideration Shpl,V-108-90 The Council's Planning and Development Committee report of December 16, 1991 referred the Prellwitz Short Plat back to the Hearing Examiner for reconsideration. The committee recommended that additional information be prepared and included in the official file for use by the Hearing Examiner and should the matter come back before the City Council on further appeal. Following is staff's analysis of the information requested along with recommended responsibilities: Item Information Requested 1. A map showing the street right-of-way of N.E. 36th Street and the actual developed roadway width. Comments/Clarification This map or plan should show N.E. 36th Street developed and graded to eliminate the sight distance problem, if possible. The topographic information requested in item no. 2, below,will be required to prepare this exhibit. Recommended Responsibility The applicant should be requested to prepare this map. Staff will review and evaluate prior to submission to the Hearing Examiner. 2. A topographical map of the property, N.E. 36th Street down to at least 112th Place and the extension of Aberdeen Avenue N.E. proposed by staff. Comments/Clarification This map or plan should show sufficient topography to draw profiles and plans for the development of N.E. 36th Street and Aberdeen Avenue N.E. If possible, N.E. 36th should be designed and graded to eliminate the sight distance problem if possible. Recommended Responsibility The applicant should be requested to prepare this map. Staff will review and evaluate prior to submission to the Hearing Examiner. APPEAL 2.DOC Reconsideration of Prellwitz Short Plat SHPL,V-108-90 December 18, 1991 Page 2 Item Information Requested 3. Sight line calculations for the entry driveway. both as proposed by the applicant and by the City. Comments/Clarification Sight line calculations is not entirely correct terminology. Rather than calculations, sight distance is best shown on a drawing showing a plan and profile of the proposed streets and entry driveways. Recommended Responsibility The applicant should be requested to prepare this map. Staff will review and evaluate prior to submission to the Hearing Examiner. 4. A map locating the exact points from and to which sight line calculations have been performed. Comments/Clarification This should be combined with item no.3,above. Recommended Responsibility Applicant with staff review. 5. An area map covering a larger area so that Lincoln Avenue, 112th Place and the extension of Aberdeen Avenue,as they relate to one another,would be shown on that map. Comments/Clarification This map should show how the proposed short plat fits into the City's overall transportation and development plans for the area. Recommended Responsibility Transportation staff. 6. A report determining whether or not Aberdeen Avenue N.E., if extended, could be used both by the Prellwitz parcel and by the triangular parcel located to the west of the Prellwitz parcel. Comments/Clarification This would be shown on the map requested under item no.2, above. Recommended Responsibility Transportation staff would prepare this report with the applicant supplied information. APPEAL 2.DOC r Reconsideration of Prellwiti Short Plat SHPL,V-108-90 December 18, 1991 Page 3 Item Information Requested 7. A report discussing the possibility of vacation of Aberdeen Avenue N.E. adjacent to the Prellwitz Parcel. Comments/Clarification This report really depends upon the applicant's success in designing and grading N.E. 36th to eliminate the sight distance problem. If this problems can be eliminated, then staff could likely support the applicant's proposed entrance. With this entrance there would be no requirement for additional right-of-way dedication along Aberdeen. The remaining portion of the right-of-way could be vacated to the triangular parcel for a private access driveway. • Recommended Responsibility Transportation Staff. • APPEAL 2.DOC November 25. 1991 Renton City Council Minutes 'Y Page 385 R6zone: M-V Properties, Hearing Examiner recommended approval of M-V Properties rezone of an Valley Gardens Health existing 40,000 square foot medical office building, Valley Gardens Health Center, R-053-91 Center, 601 South Carr Road, from P-1 to O-P, subject to applicant filing restrictive covenants that restrict the existing office building to medically- related uses (R-053-91). Refer to Ways and Means Committee. Appeal: Prellwitz Short Appeal of Hearing Examiner's recommendation filed by Douglas Prellwitz, Plat, NE 36th Street applicant, regarding sight distance along NE 36th Street and property access (SHP-108-90) conditions imposed on Prellwitz short plat, 1.5 acres, NE 36th Street (File No. SHP-108-90). Refer to Planning and Development Committee MOVED BY NELSON, SECONDED BY STREDICKE, COUNCIL APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA AS AMENDED. CARRIED. INFORMATION ITEM City Clerk submitted King County Official Canvass which reported the King County: General following 1991 General Election results for the City of Renton: Election Results 1991 MAYOR (four-year term) Earl Clymer 5,568 ELECTED Jim Newton 5,077 COUNCIL Position No. 1 (unexpired two-year term) Tim Schlitzer 5,746 ELECTED Versie Vaupel 3,750 Position No. 2 (four-year term) Toni Nelson 7,094 ELECTED Position No. 3 (four-year term) Kathy Keolker-Wheeler 5,495 ELECTED Randy Corman 4,010 Position No. 4 (four-year term) Jesse Tanner 4,766 ELECTED Jeff Lukins 4,521 Position No. 5 (four-year term) Richard (Dick) Stredicke 5,457 ELECTED Mark Groening 3,799 It was further reported that Renton has 17,354 registered voters, 11,632 total ballots were cast in this election which included 2,371 absentee ballots. CORRESPONDENCE Correspondence was read from Arneta Henninger, President, Local 21R, CAG: 90-075, Washington State Council of County & City Employees AFSCME (AFL-CIO), Compensation & 1101 South Fawcett, Tacoma, 98402, regarding the Ewing Company Classification Study, Classification and Compensation Study. Ms. Henninger reported that Local Ewing 21R representatives reaffirmed their endorsement of the Study and requested that it be approved. Ms. Henninger also requested that "red-lined" positions be evaluated in the future to ensure that salary levels are equitable. • OLD BUSINESS MOVED BY EDWARDS, SECONDED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, Planning: Interlocal COUNCIL CONSIDER THE COUNTY-WIDE PLANNING POLICIES Agreement FRAMEWORK AGREEMENT WHICH WAS PREVIOUSLY REFERRED Comprehensive Plan TO THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE. CARRIED. County-wide Planning Policies Councilman Edwards referenced a proposed interlocal agreement establishing the framework and process for developing comprehensive plan County-wide planning policies required by July, 1992, under the Growth Management Act. Mr. Edwards advised Suburban Cities Association (SCA) endorsed the proposed agreement which includes the following: 1) Establishment of the Growth Management Planning Council of King County (GMPCKC) comprised of elected officials from Seattle, suburban cities, and King County. The GMPCKC will recommend policies to King County. 2) A County-wide planning policies adoption and ratification process. 3) Staff policy development by dedicated King County executive staff and an interjurisdictional staff group. 4) Public involvement, GMPCKC staffing, and the dedicated staffing will be funded on a region-wide basis from Growth Management Act grant funds. CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL AI #: 6.5 SUBMITTING DATA: FOR AGENDA OF: 11/25/91 Dept/Div/Board.. Administrative Services/City Clerk Staff Contact.. Marilyn Petersen AGENDA STATUS: Consent XX SUBJECT: Public Hearing.. Appeal of Hearing Examiners decision; Short Plat to Correspondence.. subdivide 1.5 acres, NE 36th St. & Aberdeen Ave. & Ordinance Variance to access lots by private road (Prellwitz) Resolution File No. SHPL, V-108-90 old Business.... New Business.... EXHIBITS: Study Session... A. City Clerk's Letter Other B. Letter of Appeal C. Hearing Examiner's Report dated 11/4/91 RECOMMENDED ACTION: APPROVALS: Refer to Planning and Development Committee Legal Dept Finance Dept.... Other FISCAL IMPACT: Expenditure Required... N/A Transfer/Amendment.. Amount Budgeted Revenue Generated... SUMMARY OF ACTION: Appeal filed by Douglas Prellwitz accompanied by required fee received on 11/18/91 to 0 CITY OF RENTON imIL "_,. Finance Department Earl Clymer, Mayor Dan Clements,Director November 20, 1991 CERTIFICATE OF MAILING STATE OF WASHINGTON) ss COUNTY OF KING. ) MARILYN J. PETERSEN, City Clerk for the City of Renton, being first duly sworn on oath, deposes and says that she is a citizen of the United States and a resident of the State of Washington, over the age of 21 and not a party to nor interested in this matter. • That on the 20th day of November, 1991, at the hour of 5:00 p.m your affiant duly mailed and placed in the United States Post Office at Renton, King County, Washington, by first class mail to all parties of record, notice of appeal of Hearing Examiner's recommendation filed by Douglas Prellwitz (File No. SHPL, V-108-90). Marilyn J. en, City Clerk SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE me this 20th day of November, 1991. ew 1Wotary,, ublic ind r a Sta of ',Wahington, resi. ng in • t \ 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2558 % 5. CITY JF RENTON y f;1:h Finance Department Earl Clymer, Mayor Dan Clements,Director November 20, 1991 APPEAL FILED BY DOUGLAS PRELLWITZ • RE: Appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision, dated November 4, 1991, regarding application by Douglas Prellwitz for Short Plat to subdivide 1.5 acres, NE 36th Street and,Aberdeen Avenue NE, into four lots for future single-family homes and Variance to provide access, to lots by a private road (SHPL, V-108-90). To parties of record: Pursuant to Title IV, Chapter 8, Renton City Code of Ordinances, written appeal of the hearing examiner's decision on the referenced matter has been filed with the city clerk, along with the proper fee of $75.00. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the written appeal and other pertinent documents will be reviewed by the Council's Planning and Development Committee, and the recommendation of the Committee will be considered by the City Council at a subsequent Council meeting. The Council secretary will notify all parties of record of the date and time of the Planning and Development Committee meeting. If you are not listed in local telephone directories and wish to attend the meeting, please contact the Council secretary at 235- 2586 any weekday (except Friday) after 1:00 p.m. for information. Sincerely, D") Marilyn J. s'en, CMC City Clerk 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2558 APPEAL HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON WRITTEN APPEAL OF HEARING EXAMINER'S DECISION/RECOMMENDATION TO lt,ENT% CITY COUNCIL. NOV :. FILE NO. 5 H V — 1 0 c6 -Y O RECEIVED .) f c�APPLICATION NAME: De, c .s /2/-e-/4-t-// /- gal Y CLERK'S OFFICE The undersigned interested party Hereby files its Notice of Appeal from the decision or recommendation of the Land Use Hearing Examiner, dated 1/ — 19 ct t . 1. IDENTIFICATION OF PARTY APPELLANT: // REPRESENTATIVE (IF ANY) Name: Do L., 7 l&s /Q/`G`l//W Name: - Address: ZO 3 ? S 5 i /3 6 .S� Address: .5,_ 7 vg 4 e, [ ?lQ 2 Telephone No. 2. 3 7/ Telephone No. 2. SPECIFICATION OF ERRORS (Attach additional sheets, if necessary) Set forth below are the specific errors or law or fact upon which this appeal is,based: FINDING OF FACT: (Please designate number as denoted in the Examiner's report) No. Error: f %.� Correction: CONCLUSIONS: No. Error: Correction: OTHER No. Error: Correction: 3. SUMMARY OF ACTION REQUESTED: The City Council is requested to grant the following relief: (Attach explanation, if desired) Reverse the decision or recommendation and grant the following relief: Modify the decision or recommendation as follows: Remand to the Examiner for further consideration as follows: Other Ap llant/I� presentative Signature Date NOTE: Please refer to Title. IV, Chapter 8, of the Renton Municipal Code, and Section 4-8-16, for specific appeal procedures. November 15, 1991 heappeal.doc/forms City of Renton City Code Title IV - Building Chapter 8 Hearing Examiner Section 16 - Appeal 4-8-16: APPEAL: Unless an ordinance providing for review of decision of the Examiner requires review thereof by the Superior Court,'any interested party aggrieved by the Examiner's written decision or recommendation may submit a notice of appeal to the City Clerk upon a form furnished by the City Clerk, Within fourteen (14) calendar days from the date of the Examiner's written report. The notice of appeal sha 1 be accompanied by a fee in accordance with the fee schedule of the City. A. The written notice of appeal shall fully, clearly and,thoroughly specify the substantial error(s) in fact or law which exist in the record of the proceedings from which the appellant seeks relief. B. Within five (5) days of receipt of the notice of appeal, the City Clerk shall notify all parties of record of the receipt of the appeal.. Other parties of record may submit letters in support of their positions within ten (10) days of the dates of mailing of the notification of the filing of the notice of appeal. C. Thereupon the Clerk shall forward to the members of the City Council all of the pertinent documents, including the written decision or recommendation, findings and conclusions contain d in the Examiner's report, the notice of appeal, and additional letters submitted by the parties. D. No public hearing shall be held by the City Council. No new or additional evidence or testimony shall be accepted by the City Council unless a showing is made by the party offering the evidence that the evidence could not reasonably have been available at the time of the hearing before the, Examiner. If the Council determines that additional evidence is required, the Council may remand the matter to the Examiner for reconsideration. .The cost of transcription of the hearing record shall be borne by the appellant. In the absence of any entry upon the record of an order by the City Council authorizing new or additional evidence or testimony, it shall be presumed that no new or additional evidence or testimony has been accepted by the City Council, and that the record before the City Council is identical to the hearing record before the Hearing Examiner. E. The consideration by the City Council shall be based solely upon the record, the Hearing Examiner's report, the notice of appeal and additional submissions by parties. F. If, upon appeal of a decision of the. Hearing Examiner on an application submitted pursuant to Section .4-8-10A and after examination of the record, the Council determines that a substantial error in fact or law exists in the record, it may remand the proceeding to Examiner for • reconsideration, or modify, or reverse the decision of the Examiner accordingly. G. If, upon appeal from a recommendation of the Hearing Examiner upon an application submitted pursuant to Section 4-8-10B or C, and after examination of the record, the Council determines that a substantial error in fact or law exists in the record, or that a recommendation of the Hearing Examiner should be disregarded or modified, the City Council may remand the proceeding to the Examiner for reconsideration, or enter its own decision upon the application pursuant to Section 4-8-1OB or C. H. In any event, the decision of the City Council shall be in writing and shall specify any modified or amended findings and conclusions other than those set forth in the report of the Hearing Examiner. Each material finding shall be supported by substantial evidence in the record. The burden of proof shall rest with the appellant. (Ord. 3658, 9-13-82) heappeal.doc/forms CITY OF RENTON .,U \\* Novem___ 14, 1991 NOV 1 8 1991 20335 SE 136th Street Issaquah, WA 98027 tibOIERWSOMC TO: City of Renton Council RE: DOUGLAS PRELLWITZ SHORT PLAT File No . : SHPL, V-108-90 Pursuant to Title IV, Chapter 8, Section 16 of the City's Code, the undersigned is formally appealing the Examiner 's decision with respect to the access proposed for the above referenced short plat . We feel that the information provided by the City staff with respect to the sight distance along NE 36th Street is not accurate, and their calculation of the slopes across the existing and proposed dedication of right-of-way for Aberdeen Avenue NE is ambiguous . The sight distance was determined by visual inspection of the area, instead of determining the sight distance by field survey and establishing an ultimate profile for NE 36th Street . If the sight distance is properly measured, you will find that the information submitted by the staff is not accurate . In accordance with the Examiner 's request we provided the staff with topographic survey depicting vertical elevations along the easterly boundary of my property ( the west margin of Aberdeen Avenue NE ) and along an east-west line bisecting my easterly boundary line . The topographic survey was performed by Mr . Kenneth Olyer, a Professional Land Surveyor . These elevations depict steep slopes across the proposed Aberdeen Avenue NE right- of-way in access of 15%. The slopes across the property to the east is approximately 21 % and the slopes into my property west of Aberdeen is approximately 14% for a distance of 27, then the ground becomes flatter approximately 150 feet . The access to the property as recommended by the staff ( Exhibit #16 - revised staff proposal ) is not only difficult to construct, but economically not feasible to construct. The steep slopes across the proposed alignment of Aberdeen Avenue NE would require retaining wall on both sides of the street in order for me to construct it in accordance with the City' s street standards . It is my understanding that this access does not meet the City Fire Department regulation as it relates to the 150 feet maximum roadway length they would allow without a cul-de-sac . My Engineer states that the direct access from NE 36th Street provides a better access to the property and meets the Fire Department regulations as it relates to length of street . Accordingly, the sight distance from the proposed access meets the staff 's recommended of 150 feet . The Staff has requested additional 20 feet of right-of-way to be dedicated from my property for the future development of Aberdeen Avenue NE. It is interesting the staff do not believe that the extension of Aberdeen to the north is feasible because of the steep grade and its alignment with the County Road 112th Place SE. I do not understand the reason the staff insisting on constructing half of Aberdeen, knowing that the road cannot be extended any further to the north. We have pointed out to the staff that the existing 30-foot right- of-way for Aberdeen was dedicated from the original property when the plat of C.D. Hillman's Washington Garden of Eden Division 7 was created . The dedication of an additional 20 feet from my property would impact the minimum size of lot (15000 square feet) required by the Health Department . We therefore request the Council to approve the original short plat layout providing an access from NE 36th Street and the deleting the requirements for dedication of additional 20 feet from my property. Thank you. Respectfully, Douglas Prellwitz Owner • • C%T OF[MERIT®B� ::..:. , NOV 1 81991 'irdEe@VEI) • c:ITY CLERK'S OFFICE • • • • • r - CITY is .. �1 �',+_..' t_. ray q:'i 1lil .. -" i • • S • �I t`? ,;� x rt,,n TOTAL g 130 I t5-rii ? . • • , 1 t itT__�. �t_ • • • L1 1:'. 11 t t1 i.H' -. • �lir tit:J.. • Gp[ i RECEIVES • CITY OF RENTON MEMORANDUM OCT 2 5 1991 C TV OF RENTON HEARING EXAMINER DATE: October 25, 1991 TO: Fred Kaufman, HEARING EXAMINER FROM: Don Erickson, Principal Planner 1 STAFF CONTACT: Paul Forsander, Senior Planner J • Mark Pywell, Senior Planner Clint Morgan, Engineering Specialist • SUBJECT: ANALYSIS OF SHORT PLAT ALTERNATIVES Prellwitz Short Plat SH PL;V-108-90 This memorandum was prepared in response to the Hearing Examiner's request of October 17, 1991 for the applicant to provide accurate plat maps of the three alternative configurations under consideration, and staff's analysis of the resultant lot areas, key plat and street dimensions and slopes. NEW EXHIBITS The applicant has provided four exhibits: Exhibit A: Applicant's Proposal without a 20 foot street right-of-way dedication along Aberdeen Avenue NE. Exhibit B: Staff's alternative proposal with partial 20 foot street dedication and cul-de-sac dedication along Aberdeen Avenue NE. Exhibit C: Applicant's Proposal with a 20 foot street right-of-way dedication along Aberdeen Avenue NE. Exhibit D: Profile and Cross-Section Plan with a Profile of the Aberdeen Avenue NE right-of- way and Cross Section A-A showing topography through the staff proposed cul- de-sac and private road access to the plat. Staff provides an additional exhibit: Exhibit B: Staff's alternative proposal with partial 20 foot street dedication without the cul- de-sac dedication along Aberdeen Avenue NE, and a larger "hammerhead" turnaround on the subject site. • DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS Topographic Information Staff analysis of topographic information submitted by the applicant is based upon review of City of Renton aerial topographic maps, USGS topographic maps and field observation by Clint Morgan and Paul Forsander on October 24, 1991. Staff generally concurs with the topography shown on the Profile of the Aberdeen Avenue NE right-of-way. The slope along the Aberdeen right-of-way is approximately 10 to 12 • stafmemo Memo To Hearing Examiner Pr.ellw hart Plat SH PL;V-108-90 October 25, 1991 Page 2 percent, which is within the City's standards for maximum slope for a residential street. Staff, however, disagrees with some of the topography shown on Cross-Section A-A, showing topography through the proposed cul-de-sac and private road access to the plat. The applicant shows the topography from the eastern property line/street right-of-way line westward to be 22.13 percent. We believe the slope to be 3 to 5 percent, which is well within the limits for construction of a cul-de-sac and private access road to the plat. Lot Area Requirements Zoning The R-1, Residential Zone requires a minimum lot size of 7,200 square feet. Septic System Since the proposed short plat would utilize on-site septic systems, minimum lot area would be determined through the septic system design approval process by Seattle-King County Health Department. Section 9-12-8 N of the Subdivision Ordinance describes Sanitary Sewer requirements for Short Plat Subdivisions: "If a public sewer main or other adequate means of common disposal is not located within two hundred feet (200') or less of the nearest property line of the proposed subdivision, the subdivider may provide for the installation of an approved septic tank and disposal field system upon approval in writing for the Health Agency and in compliance with the City's applicable ordinances. in such cases, a dry sanitary sewer line shall be installed in the subdivision according to a sanitary sewer plan for the subdivision approved by the Department of Public Works. Side sewer lines shall be installed eight feet (8') into each lot. The Hearing Examiner may waive this requirement only if the area has _ not been included in the comprehensive sewer plan. The subdvider shall submit satisfactory evidence of favorable percolation rates comparable to the adopted requirements and standards of the Seattle-King County Health Department prior to approval of a subdivision dependent upon septic tanks as a means of sewage disposal. The subdivider shall provide covenants running with the land satisfactory to the City requiring the owners of the lots within the subdivision to hook up to and pay their proportionate share of any later extensions of a public sewer main adjacent to the subdivision." To date, the applicant has not provided any evidence of approval of the proposed septic design by the Seattle-King County Department of Health. The applicant stated at the last Public Hearing, on October 15, 1991, that the minimum lot area required for septic systems would be 16,000 square feet, however, no evidence has been provided of such a determination by the Health Department. Staff's discussions with the Health Department indicate minimum lot area requirements would depend upon soil types and percolation rates. Minimum lot areas required for septic systems generally range from 12,000 square feet up to 18,000 square feet. Until the applicant provides evidence of septic system approval by the Seattle-King County Department of Health, and documentation of minimum lot area requirements, there can be no approval of this short plat subdivision per requirements Section 9-12-8 N of the Subdivision Ordinance. stafinemo Memo To Hearing Examiner Prellw hort Plat SH PL;V-108-90 October 25, 1991 Page 3 • Alternative Plat Configurations EXHIBIT A: Applicant's Proposal without a 20 foot street right-of-way dedication along Aberdeen Avenue NE. Transportation The are two problems with this plat configuration. First, there is inadequate sight distance between the proposed private road access on NE 36th Street and the crown of the hill approximately 100 feet to the north. ASHTO recommends a minimum sight distance of 150 feet. Resolving the sight distance problem would involve substantial cuts, of up to 20 feet, along both sides of the NE 36th right-of- way and on private property. The second problem is a minimum 50 foot right of way (including a 20 foot dedication from the applicant) would be needed for the future construction of Aberdeen Avenue to allow development of the triangular parcel to the east of the proposal site. Lot Sizes All lots meet minimum zoning area requirements of 7,200sf: Lot 1: 15,914sf Lot 2: 17,067sf Lot 3: 17,417sf Lot 4: 16,146sf Conclusion Lack of good sight distance to the proposed access is the major deficiency with this configuration. This access alternative does not accommodate future access to the triangular parcel to the east of the proposal site. Note, staff has reviewed a pre-application for the triangular parcel. Transportation staff indicate access would only be permitted for Aberdeen, since there is insufficient off-set from the 112th Place intersection, and access would not be permitted from 112th Place because it is an arterial and because of steep slopes on the triangular parcel. EXHIBIT B: Staff's alternative proposal with partial 20 foot street dedication and cul-de- sac dedication along Aberdeen Avenue NE. Transportation This configuration alternative addresses the concern of inadequate site distance on NE 36th to the plat access (Aberdeen Avenue NE). There is 200 feet between the centerline of 112th Place and the center line of Aberdeen Avenue NE. Construction of the cul-de-sac would require placement of fill on a portion of the private parcel to the east of the proposal site. As shown on the attached diagram (Exhibit B with staff drawn diagram and comments) the fill would form a tapered crescent from north to south.At its greatest, the fill would extend approximately 14 foot eastward beyond the right-of-way. Construction of the cul-de-sac would reduce development potential of the triangular parcel from two lots to one. Lot Sizes All lots meet minimum zoning area requirements of 7,200sf: Lot 1: 15,602sf Lot 2: 17,407sf Lot 3: 14,182sf Lot 4: 14,525sf Conclusion This alternative addresses staff's concerns regarding sight distances along NE 36th Street and access for future development of the triangular parcel to the east. Staff, however, believes the cul-de-sac is an unnecessary hardship on the subject site, and particularly the adjacent triangular parcel. Staff recommends deletion of the cul-de-sac and enlargement of the "hammerhead" on the subject site as an sta(memo Memo To Hearing Examiner Prelh short Plat SH PL;V-108-90 October 25, 1991 Page 4 • alternative (See Exhibit E). This would still provide adequate fire access to both parcels. It would also result in larger lot sizes than the Exhibit B configuration: Lot 1: 15,600sf Lot 2: 17,600sf Lot 3: 16,000sf Lot 4: 14,900sf EXHIBIT C: Applicant's Proposal with a 20 foot street right-of-way dedication along Aberdeen Avenue NE. Transportation This configuration alternative addresses the right-of-way dedication concern discussed under Exhibit A, above. However the inadequate sight distance between the proposed private road access on NE 36th Street and the crown of the hill approximately 100 feet to the north remains. Lot Sizes All lots meet minimum zoning area requirements of 7,200sf: Lot 1: 14,806sf Lot 2: 15,949sf Lot 3: 16,148sf Lot 4: 14,865sf Conclusion Similar to Exhibit A's configuration, lack of good sight distance to the proposed access is the major deficiency with this alternative. Unlike Exhibit A, however, this access alternative does accommodate future access to the triangular parcel to the east of the proposal site. The primary problem with this alternative is the short distance between the proposed subdivision private road and Aberdeen Avenue NE. DEPARTMENTAL RECOMMENDATION 1. Staff recommends that the Hearing Examiner approve the proposed Prellwitz short plat (SH PL; V- 108-90) per previous recommendations contained in the Preliminary report to the Hearing Examiner dated Sept. 10, 1991,with the exception of Condition No. 4 which would be replaced by recommendation 3 outlined below. 2. Until the applicant provides evidence of septic system approval by the Seattle-King County Department of Health, and documentation of minimum lot area requirements, there should be no approval of this short plat subdivision by the Hearing Examiner per requirements Section 9-12-8 N of the Subdivision Ordinance. [Note, Title 13 of the King County Board of Health Code requires Seattle-king County Health Department approval of the septic system design prior to approval of any short plat or subdivision]. 3. [Note this recommendation would replace condition 4 of the Preliminary report to the Hearing Examiner dated Sept. 10, 1991] The short plat shall be amended per Exhibit E to addresses staffs concerns regarding sight distances along NE 36th Street and access for future development of the triangular parcel to the east. As previously discussed, staff does not recommend the configurations shown in Exhibits A or C. Based upon further analysis, staff now believes the cul- de-sac shown in Exhibit B would be an unnecessary hardship on the subject site, and particularly the adjacent triangular parcel. Staff therefore recommends deletion of the cul-de-sac and enlargement of the"hammerhead" on the subject site as an alternative (See Exhibit E). This would still provide adequate fire access to both parcels and would also result in larger lot sizes. stafmemo • CITY OF RENTON • MEMORANDUM DATE: October 8, 1991 TO: Fred J. Kaufman, Hearing Examiner FROM: Donald K. Erickson,AICP Zoning Administrator STAFF CONTACT: Mark Pywell,AICP Project Manager SUBJECT: Prellwitz Short Plat This memorandum is submitted in response to your request for additional discussion of the staff proposed amendments to the short plat. The concerns raised at the public hearing included the location of the proposed access road, size of the lots, location of the area to be dedicated for public roads and the location of the building pads. Staff. has recommended that the proposed access road be located off of Aberdeen Ave. on the east side of the subject property as indicated on the attached Exhibit A. The concern staff has with the applicant's proposal (Exhibit B) is that there would not be sufficient separating between the intersection of NE 36th Street/Aberdeen Ave. and the private access road. The Transportation Systems Division requires a minimum of 200 feet between intersections (Municipal Code Section (9-12-8.G.14). Although there would not be 200 between the staff proposed location of the private access road and the 36th St./Aberdeen Ave. intersection,staff feels that there would be less conflicts with the traffic patterns and turning movements of vehicles as Aberdeen would be a cul-de-sac on the north side of 36th Street. • The applicant's engineer has stated that the existing slopes in the location of Aberdeen Ave. north of 36th Street are too great for Aberdeen Ave. to be constructed.. The plans submitted by the applicant show a 12.5% slope down the length of the proposed road with approximately 10% cross slope. The plan submitted shows a 26.6% slope but it appears that the greater slope does not start until after the east side of the right-of-way for Aberdeen Ave. After reviewing the materials submitted by the applicant's engineer, the Transportation Systems Division staff still feel that it would be possible to construct Aberdeen Ave. along the east side of the subject property. The American Association of State and Highway Transportation Officials (ASHTO) manual recommends a minimum sight distance of 150 feet. Due to the slope of the terrain in this area, staffs proposed access to the short plat would provide approximately 130 feet of sight distance from the intersection of Aberdeen/36th Street and the intersection of 36th Street and 112th Street. However, the proposed intersection of Aberdeen Ave. and 36th Street would be located at the top of a ridge which would give motorist the maximum ability to spot oncoming traffic. The applicants proposed access, which is located at the bottom of a draw would not allow motorist to see oncoming traffic until it was less than 100 feet away. A City staff generated short plat has been prepared to demonstrate the approximate location of the road right-of-ways, dedications, private road, and the building pads. hexmemo The lot sizes for the short plat are as follows: • Lot# Applicant's Proposal Staff's Proposal 1 15,914 square feet 16,335 square feet 2 16,146 square feet 17,400 square feet 3 17,417 square feet 15,500 square feet 4 17,067 square feet 17,450 square feet In the initial review of the short plat, Transportation Systems Division staff stated thet the applicant would need to provide right-of-way dedication and half-width improvements on the west side of the proposed short plat for Monterey Ave. and on the east side for Aberdeen Ave. In working with the applicant the Transportation Systems Division determined that Monterey Ave. would not be required for this project and that Aberdeen Ave. could be terminated at the location of the staff proposed private access road. The total length of Aberdeen Ave. (north of 36th Street) and the private road would be approximately 255 feet. Aberdeen Ave. was chosen as the access point over Monterey Ave. because a half-width dedication had already been obtained. As indicated on the short plat, NE 36th Street is proposed to be developed with a 60 foot wide right-of-way. It would become the local collector street for this area. Intersections would need to lbe located a minimum of 200 feet apart in order to allow for sufficient sight distance and turning movements between the intersections along NE 36th Street. The City staff proposed short plat has been reviewed by the Fire Prevention Bureau staff. The staff proposed plan would meet Fire Prevention Bureau requirements as long as Aberdeen Ave. was a City street and a cul-de-sac was provided. Fire Prevention Bureau staff would then measure the length of the proposed private access road from the edge of the City owned right-of-way. As long as the private access road from that point was less then 150 feet,the applicant would not have to provide a hammerhead or cul- de-sac that meet Fire Department standards. The hammerhead indicated on both of the proposals would not meet Fire Prevention Bureau standards if the private access road was extended beyond the 150 foot limit established by City Code. Staff would also like to note that the owner of the property on the east side of the proposed extension of Aberdeen Ave. has contacted the City in regards to the subdivision of his property. The owner has tentatively stated that he would be willing to participate in the cost of the improvements to this road. RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff recommend that the Hearing Examiner approve the proposed Prellwitz short plat (ShPI-108- 90)with the following conditions: 1. The owner shall provide evidence of King County Health Department approval for the use of septic systems and drainfields for Lot #1, Lot #2, Lot #3, and Lot #4 prior to the issuance of site preparation permits. Note: 1.a: Septic systems may be permitted as no connection to sewer lines is feasible at this time. In the event that connection to a King County or City Id Renton sanitary sewer system does become feasible at a future date, the owner(s), will be called upon to make that connection. The applicant shall provide the City with a covenant on each of the proposed lots that requires the land owner to connect with a City or County sewer system within 12 months of such a sanitary sewer system becoming available within 500 feet of any proposed property line. The covenant shall be noted on the face of the plat and recorded with the title report for the subject properties. hexmemo ' I Note: 1.b: Dry line sewers shall be installed for each of the proposed lots to facilitate the connection into a sanitary sewer system at the time the sewer system becomes available. 2. The owner shall provide a description of the extent to which existing trees and plants on proposed Lot #1, Lot #2, Lot #3 and Lot #4 will be removed or disturbed by the proposed short plat. This inventory/plan shall be provided to the satisfaction of the Development Planning Section prior to the public hearing for the short subdivision. A note shall be recorded on face of the plat indicating that existing trees shall be retained in accordance with the approved tree retention plan. 3. The applicant is encouraged to meet with the Community Services Department to discuss ' this project's impacts on the City's recreational facilities and proposed Master Trails Plan. ' The applicant is encouraged to make a voluntary contribution of$600.00 ($150 x 4 lots) to the Parks Department to mitigate the impacts of this project on area recreation facilities. 4. The applicant shall, in order to address City policy/regulations and mitigate traffic impacts, amend the short plat so that the proposed private road has its access from Aberdeen Ave. NE. An agreement shall be recorded on the face of the plat and recorded with the title report limiting access to Lots 1 and 2 to the private road and not from NE 36th Street. 5. The applicant shall, in order to mitigate the adverse impacts of construction, provide a temporary erosion control plan and a construction management plan to the satisfaction of the Department of Planning/Building/Public Works. Note: 5.a The applicant shall provide all required improvements (e.g. utility connections, road improvements) in accordance with the City of Renton Municipal Code. 6. The applicant shall, in order to mitigate potential impacts to the flow of traffic on N.E. 36th Street, record an agreement.on the face of the Final Plat that each of the four lots will gain access from the proposed private road and that no direct access from N.E. 36th Street shall be permitted. If you have questions or would like additional information, please contact us at Extension 2550. hexmemo I r _ PRELL /// iZHSHORT SW 1/4 .OF THE NE 1/4 i SECTION 32, TOWNSHIP 24 N RANGE 5! EAST, W.M. • = CITY OF RENTON, WASHING 1 "=40' • i GRAPHIC SCAT.P, : ' i. • 0 20 40 80 160 I I . ( INFEET ) • 1 inch = 40 ft BASIS OF BEARING = KCAS DATUM. . i .• N880929" W •298'.51' • 151.25' -71 • 1u 30' • tl : 1 0 LOT 4 j LOT 3 I CTl_ ^ ti ' 1 ' Lj • cV tt.la,acrat 2 I�G.oO yj•fG• N _ 4i 0.3 G ocrrs 1.; . ir„ ;� 35.0)_ 35.00' 'z o: ' N 65.. Z w "a-Q. • !lij • • r 4.95' 5.05N 2 j, . 116.34' 417 9t N RR'30'7R" W N 88 30 26" W 121.39' I: , N I L = 90702C' o = 15.00'40" n R = 15.00'� N . cn T= 15.05' "co ^ i = il-..vJ )11 o I LLI Q 0^ L = 23.61' - L = 2.3.52' hZ1 � I • 2 ^ LOT 1 'o I W � 14 ' W W LOT 2 I CO • 16 TT�9 •FT.; : h I. i , 7 • !n, 10 I yi�B.0ff• = 8911'19" 0.37 ucrel S) Q o•K aoirl R = 25. )0' 1 `I • o ` „ T= 24 9 o �J.e6' • ; SW CORNER : . 2 ci_ 2 L , • C- OF LOT 9, BLK 132 26' 34Q 00' •111.64' . N 88 5122" W . 273 90' • I 1 30' _•_.+30' • 30', j • 655.11' N 885122" W '' • i 147.26' . ^.- 181:19' - 30STREET - 30' f NE 36 TH EAST 1 .I SECT10i • I • 5,1c�iilri?� A . . „1 YOR'S CERTIFICATE rvi. Oyu RECORDING CERTIFICATE F WASy� E�AP CORRECTLY REPRESENTS A SURVEY P' �c� FILED FOR RECORD 7N/S D3Y ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTION IN `q z 4 I 0 IAA/rc, i�4TH THE SURVEY RECORDING ACT ?i• • o 9 AT I IN BOOK • ,__ ,‘ . • :. . . PREL L //I 1 Z SH OR 7.- 4.. . SW 7/4 OF THE NE 1/4 I SECTION 32, TO NNSHIP 24 N. ' RANGE 5 EAST, W.M. .- . ' CITY OF •RENTON, WASHING 9 "=40' . • GRAPHIC SCALE : ' I. - • 0 •20 40 W 160 ' 1.1 ( 1N FEET ) 1 inch = 40 ft • . • BASIS OF BEARING = KCAS DATUM • • • I . • 3 • N 88 09 29" W •298.51` ' y 147.25' 151.25'• ' ---71 I - • I - W 30' d o n , :s I Cam: I LOT 4 �, ' in,>4,ft- . ;� d LOT 3Cr)a:o oe.. J v,4u•a a N , I .j 32: • 2 t. N W W t..i I • v of '': 1 N h • = �* • :. . j 1 �i • 35.00' 35.00' a ' 0 o N 88' 1J 26" W a 112.25' 2 NI�4.95' S.057•"+Z 116.34' • 117.21 N 883026" W N 883026" W 121.39' •4 NI • W I • b Z 6) • _ = 89'49'40" ,tr�i R 15.00 LO" N R = 15.00' h 0, T= 15.05' N ^o Q `O T= 14.96' o O L = 23.61' j L = 23.52' h ? Cc I LOT i 'Of...) IyJ • � W (�—. N 15.914 sq. ft. LOT 2 W 0.36 awes ' W ef- 14146.>R • • h h w,.� '. = 893/'19" :30' °'i R = 25.00' I • o T= 24.79 • • L = 39.06' SW CORNER • 2 Z • OF LOT 9, BLK 4 132.26' .3t7 00' 111.64' • N 88 51 22" W 273.90' 30' .4i0' 30' ' 655.11' N 885122" W - i • 147.26' �!\- 181.19. •— - • 30' • NE 36TH STREET • 30 EAST Ij SEC7701: I • h I.4* 13 _ YOR'S CER7IFICATE ��j�Oye RECORDING CERTIFICATE. ' • �• E WaSy/ F: 'AP CORRECTLY REPRESENTS A SURVEY ���� �r, ry�o FILED FOR RECORD THIS DI. BY ME OR UNDER MY DIREC770N IN 1— • J o',l4MCF_ '�:47H THE- SURVEY RECORDING ACT /. " r._e• o V, AT IN BOOK DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING APPLICANT: Tom Touma PROJECT NAME: • Prellwitz Short Plat FILE NUMBER: SH PL;V-108-90 LOCATION: N.E.36 Street and Aberdeen Ave. N.E. A. SUMMARY AND PURPOSE OF REQUEST: The applicant seeks to subdivide 1.5 acres into four lots for the future construction of single-family homes. The large lots are required in order to provide an area for septic systems. The applicant also seeks approval of a variance to provide access to the lots by a privateiroad. B. GENERAL INFORMATION: 1. Owner of Record: Douglas Prellwitz 2. Applicant: Tom Touma 3. Existing Zoning: R-1, Single-family residential. 4. Existing Zoning in the Area: Single-family residential, R-1. 5. Comprehensive Land Use Plan: Single-family residential and Greenbelt. 6. Size of Property: 1.5 acres 7. Access: N.E.36 Street 8. Land Use: Vacant land 9. Neighborhood Characteristics: North: Single-family residences. East: Single-family residences. • South: Single-family residences. , West: Single-family residences. C. HISTORICAL/BACKGROUND: Action File Ordinance Date Annexation 4275 June 25, 1990 R-1 4289 August 29, 1990 D. PUBLIC SERVICES: 1. Utilities a. Water: A twelve inch water line runs along Lincoln Ave. b. Sewer: Sanitary Sewer Is Not Available c. Storm Water Drainage: Storm water flows in a northerly direction. Closest drainage conveyance on record Is a ditch running north along east side of 112th Place. prelmrpt PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER Prellwitz Shortplat PUBLIC HEARING September 10, 1991 Page 2 2. Fire Protection: Provided by the City of Renton as per ordinance requirements. 3. Transit: Metro transit route 240 runs along 112th Place. 4. Schools: • a. Elementary Schools: Hazelwood Elementary School is located approximately one mile to the north. b. Middle Schools: McKnight Middle School is located approximately 1 1/4 miles to the south. c. High Schools: Hazen High School is located approximately 2 1/2 miles to the southeast. 5. Recreation: Kennydale Beach Park is located approximately 1 mile to the west and Kennydale Lions Park is located approximately 1 mile to the south. E. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE ZONING CODE: 1. Section 4-31-5, R-1 Residential Zone. • F. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR OTHER OFFICIAL CITY DOCUMENT: 1. Northeast Renton Plan, City of Renton Comprehensive Compendium, 1981 (pgs. 55-60) 2. Residential Goal, City of Renton Comprehensive Compendium, 1986 (pgs. 14-16). 3. Section 9-12, Subdivision Ordinance, Renton City Code. G. DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS: 1. The applicant, Douglas Prellwitz, is proposing to subdivide an existing 1.5 acre parcel into four lots ranging in size from 15,914 square feet (0.36 acres) to 17,417 square feet (0.39 acres). This will allow for the construction of four single family homes at a later date. This lot is part of the area that was annexed into the City of Renton last year as part of the Duncan Annexation. At that time, the area was designated for single family residential development and zoned R-1. The proposed short plat is consistent with the existing area. development which consists of single-family homes. The subject property is heavily vegetated with a variety of trees and shrubs. It should be noted that prior to the removal of any trees the applicant will need to provide a Routine Vegetation Management Plan to the satisfaction of the Development Services Division of the Department of Planning/Building/Public Works. 2. The application is exempt from environmental review under WAC-197-11-800 of the SEPA regulations. 3. Approval of the Short. Plat is based on several factors. The following criteria have been established to assist the decision maker in reviewing the plat: a. Compliance with Comprehensive Plan The proposed development is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan designation of Single Family Residential. The Comprehensive Plan defines the Single Family Residential area as an area intended for detached single family dwelling units --not exceeding a density of six dwelling units per gross acre--and related low density uses. The proposed project provides a density of 2.7 units per gross acre. Section IV.A.1. of the City of Renton Comprehensive Plan states that a balance should be sought or maintained between housing and the available access, utilities, and community facilities. The applicant will need to improve the access to prelmrpt PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER Prellwitz Shortplat PUBLIC HEARING September 10, 1991 Page 3 the subject property in accordance with the Code requirements and standards. The size of the lots was determined by the need to provide on-site septic systems until a public sanitary sewer system is installed in this area. Section IV.A.9. states that housing alternatives should encourage a variety of choice in architectural design, physical location, building arrangement, and ownership patterns. The proposed short plat would allow for the construction of four single-family residences by the future lot owners. The proposed lots (ranging in size from 15,914 s.f. to 17,417 s.f.) are larger than those normally provided In the R-1 zone (minimum lot size in this zone is 7,200 0.). These lots would be ideal for those who desire a more rural life style but still,would like to be located within the City. b. Compliance with underlying (or proposed)zoning designation The project site is designated R-1, Single Family Residential, on the City oMenton Zoning Map. The proposed development would allow for the future construction of four single family dwelling units. The proposed lot layout allows an adequate area for building pads and setbacks required within the R-1 zone. The minimum lot size permitted In the R-1 zone is 71200 s.f. This shortplat provides four lots ranging in size from 15,914 s.f.to 17,4117 s.f. These lot sizes are compatible with other existing lots in this area of the City. c. Reasonableness of Proposed Boundaries 11 1) Accessibility ' The planned future development of four single-family homes on this site, as facilitated by the proposed subdivision, is anticipated to generate approximately 40 ADWVTE's,which is not expected to result In significant traffic impacts. Staff have noted, that off-site Code-required transportation improvements will be needed if the plat is approved, includingi roadway plans, curbs, gutters, sidewalks and street lighting. The applicant will need to provide half-width road dedication and improvements on the east and south boundary of the project site. The applicant prefers the use of a private road off of NE 36th Street for access to each of the proposed lots. This alternative would be less expensive then the construction of a half-width road built to City street standards along the Aberdeen Ave. right-of-way. The Transportation System Division staff recommend that the private road connect with Aberdeen Ave. instead of 36th St. The City Codes require private roads to be off set from existing Intersection by a minimum of 200 feet. The private road, as proposed by the applicant, is only 111 feet from the proposed intersection of Aberdeen Ave. and 36th Street. A road easement exists south of 36th Street and a 30 foot easement exist north of 36th Street for Aberdeen Ave. Staff feels strongly that this development should not eliminate the potential for Aberdeen Ave. to be constructed in this area. Staff will recommend to the Hearing Examiner an agreement be recorded on the face of the plat that the property owners of Lot 1 and Lot 2 shall not be allowed to gain access off of 36th Street as driveways in this location would be hazardous as traffic levels on 36th Street increase. The adopted grid system for this area indicates a Monterey Ave. will be constructed along the west boundary of the project site. Transportation Systems Division staff have Indicated that the applicant would not be required to provide Improvements for this street. 2) Topography The subject property is fairly level with slopes less than 15 percent. The property is vegetated with a variety of trees. The applicant will be required to provide a tree retention plan In order to maintain the character of the site and the surrounding area. prelmrpt - r PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER Preliwitz Shortpiat PUBLIC HEARING September 10, 1991 Page 4 3) Relationship to Existing Uses The area adjacent to the project site has been developed as a single- family residential area. The lot sizes within the area range from approximately 10,000 square feet to over a one acre In size. The proposed development, lots ranging in size from 15,914 square feet to 17,417 square feet, can be considered compatible with the adjacent land uses. d. Compliance with the subdivision regulations 1) Streets The subject property abuts NE 36th Street and the proposed location of Aberdeen Ave. NE. The Transportation System Division has indicated that the applicant will need to make the Code required dedications and improvements along both of these streets. 2) Lots �f The applicant is proposing to create four lots from the existing 1.5 acre lot. The proposed lots would be approximately 121'x 151'. The size and dimension of these lots meet the standards and requirements of the Zoning and Subdivision Ordinances. The corner lots have been designed to be slightly wider(approximately 120'vs 118')than the interior lots. e. Would the short plat create a burden on public services (timeliness)? 1) Police and Fire Police and Fire Prevention Bureau staff indicate that sufficient resources exist to provide service to the proposed development provide that Code- required improvements and fees are provided. 2) Recreation The applicant has not proposed to provide on-site recreation facilities. within this plat nor have regional impacts been addressed within this proposal. The applicant will need to review the Parks Comprehensive Plan and the proposed Master Trail Plan with the Parks Section of the Community Services Department staff. In order to mitigate both on-site and regional recreation impacts the applicant will be encouraged to make a voluntary contribution of$600.00 ($150.00 X 4 Lots). 3) Schools It can be anticipated that the proposed project, once developed for single- family homes, will generate approximately 3 school aged children. The Renton School District does not anticipate that this number of students will have a negative impact on the school system. • 4) Storm Water Prior to the issuance of any site preparation permits the applicant will need to provide a final storm water analysis and install improvements in accordance with the King County Surface Water Design Manual adopted by the City of Renton. 5) Public Water and Sanitary Sewer Utilities Water Utilities staff note that a water line can easily be extended along the frontage of the proposed subdivision by the applicant to provide service to the proposed lots. There are no City sewer lines that can easily be extended to serve the proposed subdivision. Dry lines would have to be installed with the future homes served by on-site septic systems until a sanitary sewer line can be extended to the area. 11 PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER Preliwitz Shortplat PUBLIC HEARING September 10, 1991 Page 5 Staff will recommend to the Hearing Examiner that the applicant record an agreement on the face of the plat requiring that the lots will be connected to the sanitary sewer system when it becomes available. H. DEPARTMENTAL RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommend that the Hearing Examiner approve the proposed Preliwitz short plat (ShPI-108- 90)with the following conditions: 1. The owner shall provide evidence of King County Health Department approval for the use of septic systems and drainfields for Lot #1, Lot #2, Lot #3„and Lot #4 prior to the issuance of site preparation permits. Note 1.a: Septic systems may be permitted as no connection to,sewer lines is feasible at this time. In the event that connection to a King County or City''of Renton sanitary sewer system does become feasible at a future date, the owner(s), will, be called upon to make that connection. The applicant shall provide the City with a covenant on each of the proposed lots that requires the land owner to connect with a City or County sewer system within 12 months of such a sanitary sewer system becoming available within 500 feet of any proposed property line. The covenant shall be noted on the face of the plat and recorded with the title report for the subject properties. i; Note 1.b: Dry line sewers shall be installed for each of the proposed lots to facilitate the connection into a sanitary sewer system at the time the sewer system becomes available. 2. The owner shall provide a description of the extent to which existing trees and plants on proposed Lot #1, Lot #2, Lot #3 and Lot #4 will be removed or disturbed by the proposed short plat. This inventory/plan shall be provided to; the satisfaction of the Development Planning Section prior to the public hearing for the short subdivision. A note shall be recorded on face of the plat Indicating that existing trees shall be retained in accordance with the approved tree retention plan. i 3. The applicant is encouraged to meet with the Community Services Department to discuss this project's impacts on the City's recreational facilities and proposed Master Trails Plan. The applicant is encouraged to make a voluntary contribution of$600.00 ($150 x 4 lots)to the Parks Department to mitigate the impacts of this project on area recreation facilities. 4. The applicant shall, in order to address City policy/regulations and mitigate traffic Impacts, amend the short plat so that the proposed private road has its access from Aberdeen Ave. NE. An agreement shall be recorded on the face of the plat and;recorded with the title report limiting access to Lots 1 and 2 to the private road and not from NE 36th Street. 5. The applicant shall, in order to mitigate the adverse impacts of construction, provide a temporary erosion control plan and a'construction management plan to the satisfaction of the Department of Planning/Building/Public Works. Note: The applicant shall provide all required improvements (e.g. utility connections, road improvements) in accordance with the City of Renton Municipal Code. 6. The applicant shall, in order to mitigate potential impacts to the flow of traffic on N.E. 36th Street, record an agreement on the face of the Final Plat that each of the four lots will gain access from the proposed private road and that no direct access from N.E. 36th Street shall be permitted. • prelmrpt 1111 El t 64' S I1 •-). • : I' ' • - --- - • i i tr L , . SE 68'2 SI . Imml . la. . 1 . •• .0.-- _____ .. .00.... ,,, 000000• ,.000000 1• • .000000• , - i tiWi. ? • ; _,,i , 111111. al .. .., i Eillit to , ,4140y, •.• /'..,,,iiiiiii: /At ; r..........-7.410, IV% C . ........... •................•• ffice Park i" ... ..:.:.:.,:•:.:•::: ,. 11 . e ..m.. '..::::::::ii In '',, i,. B , 014 •:::i:i:i: V Ulna :*::•:•:•:- .---1 -„, 1 • ;'.N.....0.1, 41013. :.•:.iii.ii': ( _.. .. , _ , :::::::...-3,,,,,A ,.,..... Awns, :::::::::. . .• 1 . . - _ . _ .:::::::- v==. r A=.=, :.:.:.:.:. ---- as'-Public yr ,...................::,.. 11E0111\,'. 4111••••11 •i:::i*: ! I .• •::-.-1:• . Illy,11111111111,:i:: ., i DES I( , ! , i::?' .4,, -.II imit••••• •:::::::: . . „. ...... ,1111`•°•1+.'i:i:i:i:i ---1 • THE 1 r • I 1 • , , pi.!,-.4,,,;,,irie,„.7-- _.. GENEF stria! , . . 0,,,,... ,.... .{ . RATHE y ; , • . 7-- CC ,... 1 $ I 13 , •; \ ustrial .•;',.„ ..,...// 0.. N , v-,;„,--.,.. i-A,.... -.;:.c.,\.,....,.;.•:5„. • , .., ,,.:„ ., .......... ....,........ 7. Ito A:..•••• ' • E ...„.„.„,..v,...-. ...,, , • ,, •!, ...,' . L ...• .. •... • 'e 'f.Z••••• ?;.:. • i ••'"IZFr'',...t.. .f:Z•(‘':.f:S.‘'..'.•;.•.., .!;•Gr;:(ring Park ..r. !,-7 •;•.••••4-,, ,, , - , • :, .,...,c,..,,,,,,,c•,a. • ,...---,:'-',"...-;-`• • e Option ,‘ / •r •e e ........''.°•. ''..i.:.•'••••?C:':‘:P.r:•'1.c...‘'4.1..s.''..••V::..e.: •••L ...0'....:::.:';':,:;?",."J'F:,-,7;.:,••;;;,..:.--,;,-':.c.,11-/-i,7-z:,:l':v....'f:i.:•';'....• , -..,- ,,,,ii.i.N.,...t,5„3.e.„1„,... • ,,,,. .,•.,-.„..: „.... .„.„..:...,,....:.:,..7.r-.....; .?••:.0 f• "•", '-'',....e.:..,. , " 1 985 ' '',..,:,•5.i;..,!- ;•.,p ___,,,,,,,,,,,. , . !FEE iy4....._ .•i::-..,'-i-s--.- .•Ei.-.-,i,-.•,;:"!•. •-..,,c, ....0 c..,,F...7.,:47--„-;;,-;c-7...cp-S.;;•,,,;; t-,:...,,,.:...........:..,.&-: - -,-;:,....,...,-., ..,.. i• '• UM . • iiiiii: '1 •. • '''.(<•;•i;:•:-.".:".v rc`5.',5=c ..":/c.",,,° ---;,- ;" -3'.":-..6.,:?.??.4,-76`;'''''.'"''' or -r. -,"••-t `' -c:,-„,•:,-,!,,,- ee...'•0 s'".••X''''' C'FS- 'In.11 k . .... •., . 4. •• • 1 ilia6. •' ,j.V QI; '.. '''.1,..11.S°.°.3...,. .C.C;;;s0•.:4;,‘:..,i%.• ..'V ?.on ••• .. 7 ....-.,,,,......„...,-,- +. , 41:•..; ',•00000000c" . ..000000000 14 :000.0.00._ •_. • 1 1 •, litda ' I '''''' .':. •C':1'-- ‘..•,4!)'''':%:a .., • % ••••-'ing, ' I - • •'•:KM; 0. •,,..*•.:•,- '"11. ___ i-..'xima /AIME. . i'' , .. ,:;:.\:.-:. %&.;.; LAKE ,c1 . 1••#'14i:, . .`, 1.:.4 .s. ri.0 0• .:%.::::::'.1':?;%.:C!„T,... SIIIIIL . 1%:„"Ir:51.: ;,, In t'°00:0.0.°2::' :..:]; . •Z.4.`0.:,..', :•:::•. •.•..•.... ••:.• HINGTON . • ... , ... .---A ')-:::::::. . . Ni.••:- ' t.... . ,, •:T :c': iiii •doi is:1 IP ---------:..i; .-:14411z.. MeilliMillix.:::::::::: •'...%§. .0!! .x.:•:•:•:•:•:a irg;ina `,...;.,•?, -,, r' 4.‘ :Ism .. .•c. • alai; ::::::::::::,:.,..m4.11, . ' "4'... ."‘' i .:.:.:. •••:-‘•; ••.. mow. •• • seinwird>„/"----1,1 :•:• • . .•0000. I. •.....:JILIN. - - -- - ------ 14'5'....; .-- - - '.'- 1.000000000. .,.,,...,Ani ....: ...„,...:_. ,,,•" ',...,111.73. MEI ii., I • •-•...;;. • •.. imme , 1,000o0 r:*:::::.:. lisurnilig •.• ••• Imormod!;:.....::::7•4•315r.:g. . IIIIMMIM 14\ 141•-epseagsgl• 0 oc ,... .4 o • ' ••• ", " ..,:., .:..*:•.•:•i'•:gi:gX:' .0 11/* f v, I ••1 Miiiiii*:.:::.:::::::::::,Agijitrill:j IA oc ...,.; • 0 • • • •40,-,.....,V, , ,,......... ,..00 • • • • • • ,,,,, -.• .- .t :::::.... :iii: :' Itivraintr- p :::S::.i:::,':•i,\2,'..•,0g'•r.gC..r o,6..,,g0°4.•'*0'-.o.-'..Se i'.•,,••••-•-i i•.ii-•""••••* •A••-••••.-••04 ••• ••• -,0o 60•o••00•\\••••\ ••; ••,• ••'••o‘•,•/••.a,i..,.,';.,•,,t,t,:,*i:i:."::.::i:•:i*i:::::ii::i:•::::::i::1:i•*:i::'•:!•:. N' alAm•bP=i-lm m4li t7:,:i..i*i:i.„iI:,ii.i:..i.;i."i..._i,,...yi,1,;i,1.i`.t.7'4.i..14.2m,1 11.1 1,so1.0 r.1.1d ip1ils 4B m,wF:A•: .,;.;,:it....• o_•- . • • •• • • ' '.. -d- •• • • • -• ••••• • ••••0 • ••• • = i. - -- -gA 0 • •0• e6a •••• Jl • • t„1 0.0.0•t.o0 0 0o0•ccC- ...:.{,4, .8:60000000000000,0000044 •ogogos40,7,0 • 00 • • • • • • • • • • :...;‘,,, .ii:i.p ,...goggogcl‘Qnniit4-. ,.......,. ,,.•,•....?,,,,,, -.:: „a.m. . -6ci..0.0.1 ‘,02,0gogLog: e \ o - .01-• '46. _A 0;Ire . ip .. 4 :q.s.440. it. .0.•••••-••••0 • • • 0 • :•11.. " %1111 il r [A.';'. :::°.',0101,10, e' . .•:::.:?:::::::::)'::i::.. ---y,..._ :.),°0°,0gaoagg . •_•_•••••.••••••0 •••_e_e • ,,,i,:k.,k / :F.:4millas lg. , •::::::::::::::::::•:•::::::: .., ‘..000c40,, , • le "••• •••-•'•'-. ‘• •• ' It . k- *°°°°° rg°: 1).- • •••• '' ••• ' - - - .o.•••• • • ..c..3'4 • grai :.. •:•••:•:•:•:. ..:•:•:•:•:•:•:::w .:.... •- e,1°,2,,S) 0/0g. 000. • 1• .r. s 0.6.....0. ,0.,,.; A 11: .:101141111. 1 ' ::::.:1::::::::::j:./ACIARRAI:gmi •:.•111.: .0,40100:0.141• . • .. ,, ,.. . 0 0 0 i • •••••••,„,i, ••: •• 010 0 _.• _.*•.- • , r: ....,:•=",:iii • • • * • ".4:1‘‘ Mi.ggggg Milk* • •-• .i',41.15iinigliii.• • • •.`• -4.4 'ft %MI_ of . pd. -,018 4611, L .\• :+ ; I: ognt`q)ggnog‘16.6.6 'Lliiiiinginlmi ip,6,06•V•Iyi," it! • • pr•-,-'----=-',--=-F4LIMit • 0-0 • ' .0' •••,••••••••••••••............ 1•••••11:••••••3 . ,,,,..1: •;,s,ggziggggt .•_ mil.. • • • • .v. 00, ••••••• • •••• •:: ••••••••••••••,•:,::•:•:•:•:•:•:. •••••00.•mmmmm; _ , :111,:g°ggggogggge . igigigi.A.-.•,,,---.••uor=--. '. '.: ' i,'U 10.1 ri"ThA'sift)* /Al. Al :gigOggggggE: .1 !ggg'ArtinalMirti'4W aql: 1 i:':: :?•*:*':•••:•;:i:?i::::::::::: :: ••sommatommoso k 411.7. , .::::::,.:.......:.:•:•:J... . h :,.. ' " --.4--'..:7 :.F.:•-;.;:.:;7:".. •' iliaf'0'0'0'0'0'0'0'0*0`;0. 1.""2_11:111111:111 iii : ,...=z.--....-....• ... :'*i::. ''' .''''''''''''''''''''' '•°°' -- =- ..„.1r-:::...4.1131311! :: r..., 4-' • g ...''4' .14F f fp i""mk,.. .:::::::................. .... .....000.00.00000000.0 . .., .......,........„.......:.: -.... ..?:::::::,?::::,::::::,.. ,• :.::.,,.,::.,::::::::.:." ......:,.::::::::: v000000.000.. w i• LAND USE ELEMENT •.• ,:i .i.iii,:a‘., .:::.::.:•:••• .......,:::::::::::::::::: 000000000.00...0000000000%00000.• .::.:•,:•::::*•.3:::,....„. ..0••• :::*::•:*::::::::::::::*1:::i:i:i:: ,',„,.:' 1,6:::::,!,:li„:"K: -i_', .:..' .::::::iiiiii:..::.:.:.:.:•::::.:•:.::..::.: °°°0°0°0°0°0.0.0.000000o• ••••••••••• .:c.........• .•••..................,:•:,.................• .0, •:,,,,,,•:-..-:'''' •,,--- •••:•:,:c•:•:,•:•:•:•:•:::::•:••••:. W00000.0•00000000o° ..... .0-:•:Kg::i:i::.::•••••:.:::::.i:u:::.*,i*:.::::*:.:•::::::: ,,.;. •. ..i:::. .000000000.00.000000. . I I •i, 1 Single Family ar:191 Commercial . e • •••••••••••• • 060000000.00,000000000000.000. i,....... ..0 ; ..00.,000.00.. •. •:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: 00000,000.000000000.00000000000000000.. i,:....:...::....:.:.: ,.• '::.::.:i:i:i:N::::.:ii?:?: *0000000000000000000. , ,..:.:•::;.•:.:.•.:.:.. ›:. ','.•;• ••t)• 0 0 AO 0. !:4, :::.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:. •0 0 0.0.0 0 0 0 0.0000000000000000000 .......:....:.,.......:........ .,e. •00000, . :•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:::.,,.!.•- •00000000•,' : :•-:•::::::::: .• , . El Low Density :4 Multl-Family Office /Office Park . i .00000 x.:.:,::.:.x.:.:.x., ....... •:•:,:,..:::::::::: • •-•""•- i •...00.0000000000; , .....:...... ..... , A • :,,,,„ • •••••.••••••*•::if:: 1:1•••;', •::::............: :: -i.. vi ............. . ••• ',VNN•EMIIIlII .m.itu,rM_•4tt.'r".'' Medium Density P0 Public/Quasi-Public brl /Quas1-Publi ,0Th.-•c'.',.:'.<4,1•,1,1,1,•'•'•%p P*.,‘.e•;,,•c,'Ia•?,,„„rm-.,.,•7••R•6,o,..-..•m•1,m?.aI..)cL..n..s,i:Vw,.-...6,.,'1,,...„,:,,'•...)1r,0...,,-'4,i..,.'.,'p..„-.,...,,.p....).,,•fi••.16..:,.';,i''.7.•:e'•.i 2P•r.c':'?.',.;•0V.q-3.0'.".4.'./......-?.!.6.'`.',?...cf•',df:-.,•.I'.p,•2,.,,4.y;.f,,••):,...:!t V.-"n:4Y•f-,-,',.'i.d,'.:.,:.i p.?•0••••..-::...•4':'..:.•:..:•::.',.::*..:•:4'.::.•:••::.::6:•.:••::..::.:.x.••:::::••••.::.:::x•.•.:::::•••••::.:::•...••• :VlIt muiti-Fami ° V'nHigh Density Light Industrial ,„ f , ?NIVhS Multi-Family -,. :....•.. mMaP&" ...,_,.:,„,i'r2,,,•Ae,/..',0....,3•.i.;•...;...).,,,<,: h:)•r , "7. "ri :. 0';:c.i.s, ,`••, , ••••;••.,, ••••,...•••'• . '..'il• e Cr •• C •S• •'6,Y..1,6;'fi.,.19 1, m trk.,7,,. .1 Recreation mu .w.,,e. 1.,..`.• 'INE'IP••• .;-x_jairtigii. , •cr . '-'r"' ' ';,....(1fPr`rk.b-,',....-.•,c ',,,'f J.'e.,- Ill .0.0.01 Heavy Industrial ...,,,,,,,i.qi; . , /1,. '.'•1•,;. ,. ,....e:5-`• • ,4!„. f,'?.,• "" -11.1 '.i ..,qi,•"'"t")• •' 41... '"1414'44' 44.• 414114 44V- _••, - • . . 4 Wal4 Z'i.;.1.Y..,..'...FZ tx.i.ce...-r!.:v,..t. 11 ir. ' .,'.:;.r;43. ,-,..4 9...., ..,., ......,1.-liVt';.'.)'i..?.._.. as " 4k.,, A., A:-....c,,,,,Qc-t:c.,t1•1:- ...- .;,:l....es•'-'cg Greenbelt 7.z:fI t: ':;.,,,,?e,„•t3'*0•.!••1.?•")?.-,,....v.••.a....'••0 m•..,••t••,-Ci.. ...% " 1 c,w,. '4'.0 i •:.074.'•• *., . ' . [z_z_ Manufacturing Park..P"cii,;•10:,;(4.;i:c 'o:•;.0,',F,.:..tT,',3P-';.w.•,•,'0,3'-,.!..` - ' -. .-rii•%.'"F•;:e .... - :•:-. "!'''r..r.' ''' NI .7_!. I i Multiple Option 1:1,i1.4),"int',•if"."0%.01..iNqr,'3, -?...•••••:.".;'';',. "...1•,\.;. --- .:1',...:...c,c,% .;";e., 4;;#(*).C!' "'k„:,r;rf:, •j-,1 z' ';',4.‘i...'•'; •• c"...0'.4..'5 •','<'.`:•A 17-$._.•`. - '- `%-.,.W.*/-7t.c.,. "0,,.cf:e...`..,..6,''i:lir,'cr,-(,:.„H':-,A?:(:?!, .ri__I,, Nov ,45.,.,0,i icm..„.;. -, ,,; •i •-- .,0,,„:,,,,t,,3„cis,.0 0•. .,•A;A.,:'• • ....CA • • p,•,, • --...,,..,,,,-,;c.•••,,,:,,,,,,i,c,•etri-•c••••,,,,,•• .-"•,, REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: IDS a10y,• APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS ,4OT APPROVED • • • � _ DATE: 4 // /7?) SIGNATURE 0 DIRECTOR OR HORIZED REPRESENTATIVE -... - - _.. --..fPV ian • REVIEW COMMENTS TRANSPORTATION-DEVELOPMENT SERVICES PRELLWITZ SHORT PLAT SHPL; V108-90 NE 36th Street and Aberdeen Ave. NE April 11, 1991 1) Private roads are not allowed unless approved by the Hearing Examiner. 2) The proposed private road does not align with the city's street grid plan and therefore is not recommended as proposed. Also the proposed private road makes an intersection with NE 36th Street which is not allowed per city code ,which refers to street intersections offsets less than 200 feet shall not be allowed (code no.9- 12-8G14). • However, the westerly property line aligns with Monterey Ave. NE street grid Planwhich would accommodate lots 1 and .4 access and Aberdeen Ave.NE right-of-way would accommodate lots 2 and 3 access. + 3) Street improvements required to all approved roadways abutting proposed plat is a follows: a) Curb, gutters and sidewalks per city standards. b) Street lighting. c) Appropriate street signing. d) Roadway paving. e) Provisions for roadway storm drainage. 4) Appropriate roadway plans for all of the above is required. 5) All approved roadways and utilities to be installed before final plat is to be signed by the authorized approving authorities. 910EM054 Rev!cided laY rt'ON D • DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKSAPR 0 1 991 DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET BUILDING DIVISION p N iv ECF- APPLICATION NO(S).: SHPL;V-108-90 cfy FRD p Otsi PROPONENT: Douglas Preliwltz APR 0 3 1991 PROJECT TITLE: Preliwitz Short Plat t;tIVEyy BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks to short plat a 1.5 acre parcel Into four 44�� lots. LOCATION: SEC:32 TWNSHP:24N RNG:5E ' NW Corner of NE 36th St&Aberdeen Ave NE TO: PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION SCHEDULED TAC DATE: 4/26/91 ENGINEERING SECTION TRAFFIC ENG. SECTION UTILITIES ENG. SECTION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION CONSTRUCTION FIELD SERVICES DEVELOPMENT PLANNING PLANNING &TECHNICAL SERVICES PARKS AND RECREATION DIVISION OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5:00 P.M. ON APRIL 12, 1991. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: etriASINUAlairl IC c APPROVED >c APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED F/M3/ 19 /(Af--S y‘r AK( u-r7 cAevcri .d k, ��,,�5y-r�r—L� DATE: •/' SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV.5/90 devrvshl • DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION CONSTRUCTION FIELD SERVICES DEVELOPMENT PLANNING PLANNING &TECHNICAL SERVICES PARKS AND RECREATION DIVISION OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED I19 1 WRITING. I PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5:00 P.M. ON APRI , REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: T?Nrk,e, ARecircarkurr)4 PPROVEDPPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED. . 'te , ,,,,,,,a,c,6 (- ei ,.6061----/ --z2i , ,..,r(i 04,1- ii--(-ffe,,,r, erz ,a-c-4--irbiLt,-,.J7 „xeka-e_de.4,-0(, , / c' i k / GZ/� eri,---; G ; c;%ze-,/e--,- (g ,-----eezea--(74-/N--1-• . . 0/zieez_ife. gi,,,-/ii "?; ____ 4/'' ,i-ie,,./„/ ZJ----ii--,- • ',01-- Ai :,eee- -t7- ,4 _., ,-/=iig' .e --",-27C- 9 . i-- . (, .-, 7--. 7,ZdJ . .e---)1 /6--f/e- frz- - ---/Le) &/'-tet-- )-47,e____ a_5:e-- et, DATE. 44-9----,..( SIGNATU F DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE r REV.5/90 1devi ht v.... --- REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: fire.. net4 . \1on APPROVED PROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED . /A-44441:4-.2--•• A4A- • . ze.t, 4,e,teete,‘„,., ,,,..21 ,,,le.„6,..1. ...ee.i.), . ..../t‘tiolfr/ AA-1";*/ ...Z.A. 44.&-e--01-- I DATE: 'y` ,/ IGNATUR IREC R OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV.5/90 • devNeiii - DEVELOPMENT SERVICEr`'1SION CONSTRUCTION FIELD SERVICES DEVELOPMENT PLANNING PLANNING&TECHNICAL SERVICES PARKS AND RECREATION DIVISION OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING ENWG DIVISION B THIS ON SHOULD BE PROVIDED Y 5 00 P.M.ON APRIL 12,lN 1991. WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO TH REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: b`iPt.:} M1$=• 2' T;E n=-"" 6f649 APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED 1\(a-r 1N r 0oA6TcM U/ 2. 5/ r) c-rploy Gyps'/ cP4/5/./cJDAfri /Y(16-F /341-s/'V. 3, C rtr N"7 b/5rA/c/' /07 CO/LMalle-N5 sew /944N I wrzix�-pr eA ( 44,Y' 65 4- lniqop°a�,E lrvTv46_ /N/F.Afr.6fi/DA) 61.01)16 Il a /o44c , Try 5 aze, /� /NET �. --�� /P/t ,' / /, L tz. W oGq ft oor /4 .5 1kr c IK/Q,,2L /f n 7`" a.)// 1 wp /07 411 &1)//z3N To cow/ma ?b fit$ L/lye, 6T7e&Aw(s4-; PN/1/417E S P/ti-A D(Si^9oifte 5y7�-,' fruM c/T), coo S- s- 3 ro/et ar CoNVPaR6:-D, 9 o NG {9F-Py ,4L'5 N /4 ND �' .36. 5 i 'r Maxim/ moNmc-ec wilt_ 66 --Q 'Y D" Syr F�bTf'��/�� �ly/� S, 1((ow rA r �A/� 4 N/.7 /OG��I���O�G�� ©F I��� l FrN/Ot P Tv 1-G-1 4t�� N �' % t f/f/1/l/j�ijil/. � DATE: q'/0 - V SIGNATURE !' •EC j OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE �/ / 6, 50044/r 2,9,//a,3 9 a S •wad D441iiy6-sl c E / REV.5/90 devrviht REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: 3kbN Y1 er~ APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS Xt\lOT APPROVED Z N G yf cy C.FQEi c .1)1/41 Nlisc-F 2 11 S/N 4Z. Clo5r sr .DreiiAvA-Gp- cc)Nvey 1.1cE o /4FCor.D _pircbc /°N,//VG c.)Krf tu-GNG_ t 4S7- Sr�I O l= t( a T PLA El= 3r S(45/n(7- P11/41I F Pc,p1AND p 6-S/c N JW/ G- /c lC./ 77,5 /1-c cot P41\i r t/ /? Q qc l Arc ccx ti 7'y sbl� cF w T.: SPA 5(c-N ,t A(Ci c, ct- Tic-hcTL(NE PQoc) �GQ NS 5 . 5 t`r u ?xr s Tr,(G A-ND f f o7Oo� CQN roti < r as p C P'ATP Sew /9vrc.D(AlG_ P-0oTp 7//r- F t/y(56e ,D P e-Diz>1 S , C, PLAN DPV 'n6c,1 '>r3 y " I ''-20/ 5cPKR.E DATE: - -(O NATUR l&ECTO AUTHORIZED REPRES NTATIVE REV.5/90 devrveh► ! J A DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION CONSTRUCTION FIELD SERVICES DEVELOPMENT PLANNING PLANNING&TECHNICAL SERVICES ' PARKS AND RECREATION DIVISION ' OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5:00 P.M. ON APRIL 12, 1991. il • REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: IAJ�� U►`11�CS RAN 4 ?/�� i� I' APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS X NOT APPROVED 1J^ 1-oM7 b JN AM o,ve , k NNFYD4-1--E pgae- cMM 2-0Na.( 320 )4 - z. EXISTING /A" Z NI4//Y /9-L6(yG t413M,D�i- /Y /41Pfi li/=', 3, _7(rglYD i// tV,47, 1./( e- Fiq i'61 /9136 D6-',/Y r9 yr� Ain- to sru,; 40 Li ALNG NF 6'717 S> _- 7a MP-i°Aof-A73e 4/4/ 1-. ti>(ow Lo ctelTlo-N op 11 17/YF l=/TE iseyox /3� , 194 c_ ��S/O, vf- , i MU � br wirY/N Soo eel- of I " / 7 GQ r, T M ,� vrrq�J/ i.. A I;01Y6 Pif v eN r. V W 6.7��-iz s 5 yr¢Gc. 13e Goctf 1""5D /6, c/rY R/c-47 olc cv4/r .S �7 .� n�r OK wrrM'f FifS6 FI-t TS, A N° 11(07 IN /0 6At1i/ti/7: .6, tti,41. r d0i16v., 0IFN(5 51-41.C. 6E o N ZZ"x 3 y u 144 N 5/YA-t:TS, D(r P(cif 1 b 70 M)47 Re owC(., 6c4UF : 1 " - ?p 1, 0.'4Tre../6/6 rtlof14-6-$ bfi/GC re- FQU)/? J7• 9 11V'A�T � P v Go fiRF/'vr �i��s, ,°�� 417740 F�-� /.li1/fro P.jfl it DATE: 9 -/° ^V SIGNATURE !' .' RE T•: %R AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV.5/90 , • 4 demsht ji I / REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: Urtne-R-imit- 130.itt APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS OT APPROVED 1 ' ` 1Cu -e t 6Vt„ • ta.�'1 cr c �eG�CS L 4 tic � Or( b kA-Nn o� Ma.t Cre �xn& �I(o`�k. • e.X�e�c e -�v 14 �e so � k\ c 1 ,S. kve• $ off: 4j1Core - ✓1eec S aftnrr�� - rti n(r - NCO teinsI�Te \otc4k _ , t 1 i r` rdeAC� OMe ads 0A,CeI' aV\8s- k(* 7Opt 4 Cie, pb \ I.c SerV I 1: --� &-c\el rc� � �s are CLC atjulj L y._, \ S /I . cd . 1/4 I� DATE: � /f& 1� 1 SIGNATURE OF DIRE T+R •R AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE • REV.5/90 • davrveht DEVELOPMENT SERVICE( /ISION CONSTRUCTION FIELD SERVICES \_ , • . . DEVELOPMENT PLANNING • • ,•• PLANNING &TECHNICAL SERVICES PARKS AND RECREATION DIVISION OTHERS: • • .. - 1. COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5:00 P.M. ON APRIL 12, 1991. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: . . , • APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED e--ust-A 1 .L.6 -t-cu2- 1---„z c.L.A 0--.1s G,3 • V-14--4--x---9- cA.— V),k\rv.,_., ' LAtk (liz''''61Z-• \ ILA-P.- /\/•- --1 „9._ ,, LA--a_. I.A...) tx...y•--if\-. L.9--sco , GLitt, au, Lv -i-) - 'Sb;t4 ^ G 0.129.-_ 0--ThA -5( 11`--; -t4-S. fk-i--0--- 6 -s/- , e 9 --INsuu h CSIA-A--9-Jj "..::4" -A-9-<) diaj7-4Aj4.-c)-1 g--4--° ''CL-L-3 (4-0G--, )),---L-12--)--)• /3-(Ajj'-'--bAVE: 4 11 ‘ /// SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHOR! ED REPRESENTATIVE . • REV.5/90 demrsht • ' • . •, . ' , , • :' . : REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: rotic_c_. APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED _ . . • . , . • • • . , • . , • • , . . . . . , . I . DATE: SIGNATURE OF DIR OR OR . HORIZED REPRESENTATIVE •;,,Ail ; ' '.: : . . ' REV.5/90 •11;1',1: g. . . • . devrveht •,,,, ' . I , n -I • DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET { ECF- APPLICATION NO(S).: SHPL;V-108-90 PROPONENT: Douglas Prellwitz PROJECT TITLE: • Prellwitz Short Plat BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks to short plat a 1.5 acre parcel Into tour lots. LOCATION: SEC:32 TWNSHP:24N RNG:5E NW Corner of NE 36th St&Aberdeen Ave NE TO: I1, ,i PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION SCHEDULED TAC DATE: 4/26/91 ENGINEERING SECTION • TRAFFIC ENG. SECTION UTILITIES ENG. SECTION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU • POLICE DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION CONSTRUCTION FIELD SERVICES DEVELOPMENT PLANNING PLANNING &TECHNICAL SERVICES PARKS AND RECREATION DIVISION • OTHERS: 1 COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. lI PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5:00 P.M. ON APRIL 12, 1991. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: \ ,bçX.Y4jj APPROVED V APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED #1 • aj4-44-6' , I• II , • DATE: ____VZ4Z/Z____ • SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPR TATIVE j . REV.5/190 'PERTY MANAGEMENT FEE REVIEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ri PLAN REVIEW ROUTING SLIP • V ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET ►i �( OTHER • APPLICANT: G-6 - i JOB ADDRESS: ,p ç2- " NATURE OF WORK: 9` (4 e, c DATE RECEIVED BY RECEIVED FROM COMMENTS DUE WO# 1.4_ 1v1g�o�' PROPER MGMT. t�� GREEN P OF a*11 do ° / \99\ Q" FEES APPLIED El NEED MORE INFORMATION Q LEGAL DESCRIPTIONP 1 - I1 NOT APPROVED FOR Ca FRONT FOOTAGE Cl SQUARE FOOTAGE p J til APPLICATION OF FEES • El 'VICINITY MAP 11 OTHER It is the intent of this development fee analysis to put the developer/owner on notice,that the tees quoted below will apply to the subject site upon development Of the property. AU quoted fees are due and payable at the time the construction permit is issued to install the on-site and off-site improvements(i.e.underground 'utilities,Street improvements,etc.) u PRIVATE DEVELOPER HELD PROJECT COST LATECOMER LATECOMER AGREEMENT NO. PER. FIG. PEE . WATER " SEWER O -- OTHER SAD FEE SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT FIG. WATER O SEWER �. i ... OTHER SPECIAL UTILITY CONNECTION CHARGE-WATER UNITS SUCC FEE Single family residential dwelling unit$940/lot x , ! ' ef- Apartment,Condo,each multiplex unit$545/ea.unit x Commercial/Industrial$.126/sq.ft.of property x (not less than$940.00) SPECIAL UTILITY CONNECTION CHARGE-SEWER UNITS SUCC FEE - Single family residential dwelling unit$470/lot x Apartment,Condo,each multiplex unit$270/ea.unit x Commercial/Industrial$.063/sq.ft.of property is (not less than$470.00) ITOTAL: I $ The above quoted fees do NOT include inspection fees,side sewer permits,r/w permit tees Or the cost of water meters. xi '"` 7r. ,d_r_til,...e,.'0. xf4t,". . „1.0, ,,i) ,„d a a e/w4101-ti. . • 444,0,A) 4_,A.0- it_e_. ...tfir60-.1-e__ "el-f--t. .4t-d-f-p--d-t ' "at t-'(" 1"4-4" . . 1" 4 j-t&A-e- h-t . -.701Atict t°//1/ ?%-.' Signature of Director or Authorized Representative DA TE .fit«w..%hn.i/hw►/i»1/►r __ PREL L WI TZ SH OR T PLAT APPROVALS -____- - - ------- -— - - - - _____ _ _SW 1_4OF THE NE /.1/4__OF EXAMINED AND APPROVED THIS DAY OF 1991 SECTION 32, TOWNSHIP 24 NORTH, HEARING EXAMINER �_ --- - -- ------ -_---- - - -- RANGE 5 EAST, W.M. EXAMINED AND APPROVED THIS DAY OF 1991 �9 CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON . 1"—4O' ADMINISTRATION, PLANNING, BUILDING AND PUBLIC WORKS • EXAMINED AND APPROVED THIS DAY OF 1991 GRAPHIC SCALE DEVELOPMENT SERVICE MANAGER ..o • EXAMINED AND APPROVED THIS DAY OF 1991 • (IN FEE) TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM MANAGER - 1 inch..40 tt EXAMINED AND APPROVED THIS DAY OF 1991 BASIS OF BEARING=KCAS DATUM ' KING COUNTY ASSESSOR DEPUTY I LEGAL DESCRIP770N . LOT 9, BLOCK 4, HILLMAN'S CD. LAKE WASHINGTON GARDEN DIV. NO. 7,ACCORDING TO PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN VOL 76 OF _ N PLATS PAGE 18, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGON. N 8879929'W 298.51' I T4�zs' 151.25' -�I '' PRIVATE ROAD LEGAL DESCRIP770N I "'� COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 9, BLOCK 4 OF HILLMAN'S C.D. W JO' - LAKE VASHINGTON GARDEN OF EDER DIV.NQ 7, THENCE S 8B'51'22'£132.26 - v, n FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE N 013954-E 105.26 or FEET TO A POINT OF TANGENCY,; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG A CURVE TO • I LOT 4 a N - I m THE LEFT WITH A RADDUS OF 15 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF • • :n C. LOT 3 a 9070'20'.AND AN ARC LENGTH OF 23.61 FEET; THENCE N 8830'26-W o" N I•ll 4.95 FEET.; THENCE N 0139'54-E 20.00 FEET; THENCE S 88JO26'E • h 2 F' Z I moo FEET; THENCE S 07 39'54' W 20.00 FEET; THENCE N 8830 26' W Lv N W W y 5.05 FEET TO A POINT OF TANGENCY; THENCE ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT WITH A RADIUS OF 15 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 8949'40" N n a I I AND AN ARC LENGTH OF 23.52 FEET; THENCE S 07'3954"W 105.16 FEET; W h_ 35.00' 35.00' ,al Z THENCE N 885122"W 30 FEET TO THE TRUE OF BEGINNING. �• o o1 N 8810 26'w C' j Q 112.25' 2 h1I 4'95' 5.05:7 N 2 I16.34' CER77F7CATP Z I 717.21 N 88J026"W 883026"W 121.39' 4+ aI I Q A= 907020' 0= 89'49'40" n L i(V.£)HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I AM(WE ARE) THE OWNER(S)IN FEE SIMPLE Z. R= 15.00' la o Q m T= 15.00'' o O OF THE LAND HEREBY PLATTED IN THIS SHORT PLAT. ,, T= 15.05' w 11 L=23.61' 2 O Cr 2 L =23.52' 'ipn= I J 2 LETT L a 1Lf1u� I OWNER OWNER T5.9T6 e R • 1.1 ,, W W LOT 2 W 0.36 ecru O �. cn� In m h • 0= 89;Si'19" Q AKNOWLEDGEMENT 1 n !.2. j n R= 25.00' .30' I STATE OF WASHINGTON ) o �•, T=24.79 I • 0 Q,o L 39 06' \ I • COUNTY OF KING ) ss SW CORNER 2 f1 2 \// 1WS IS TO CERTIFY THAT ON 1MS�AY OF A.D. OF LOT 9, BLK 4 0' 199_,BEFORE NE THE UNDERSIGNED,A NOTARY PUBLIC 1J2.26' JO 00' 111.64' PERSONALLY APPEARED TO ME KNOWN TO BE THE I N 885722"W 273.90' I 30' INDIVIDUAL(S)WHO SIGNED THE ABOVE CERTIFICATE AND ACXNOMIEDGED • 30' J0• I TO ME THAT THEY SIGNED 1HE SANE AS THEIR FREE VOLUNTARY ACT AND — 655.11 — — — — — 1 — ABOVE WHO'S NY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL IHE DAY AND YEAR FIRST ' N 885122-W 1 • • 1310.22' '�DVO i47.26 �_ 181.19' — NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR THE • . 30' STATE OF WASHINGTON,RESIDING NE 36TH STREET 30' EAST 1/4 CORNER OF AT REHTON SECTION 32-24-5 \ _ -TOUMA ENGINEERS 1566B West Valley Hwy•Seal U4 WA 98188 (206)255-4100 } SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE _- _ rx,111 WAsti Y( _RECORDING CERT1f1CATE __ _ _ _ _________- _- `___ _ _ -- - - -_- -- — - — - - 7HlS MAP CORR£CILY REPRESENTS A SURVEY ryc' FILED FOR RECORD THIS DAY OF 199 Drawn by TO Checked by KO • MADE BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTION IN i ' CONFORMANCE WITH THE SURVEY RECORDING ACT • / '" AT IN BOOK OF-SURVEYS ON AT THE REQUEST OF DOUGLAS PRELLWITZ 97.' 5524 ElJob No. 639-001-901 Drawing No. 6J9014PC IN-MARCH 14, 1991. • Ile: P t• ,.� PACE AT THE REQUEST OF KENNETH J. OYLER 9�20//''/ /111Lk�ZA"el�GAr Dote MARCH Z 1991. Sheet 1 -Of T _RTIFT�4NUMBER 5524 DATE - MANAGER SUPERINTENDENT OF RECORDS • AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING STATE OF WASHINGTON ) )ss. County. of King ) Wanda M. Britts _ being first duly sworn, upon oath, deposes and states: That on the 4th day. of . November , 1.991. affiant deposited in the mails of the United States a sealed envelope containing a decision or recommendation with postage prepaid, addressed to the parties of record in the below entitled application or petition. %% • • cl'A\CtiotAifil) @ SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN • to before me this 4th day of November , 19910 14- k3/1V — Notary Pu ' c in d fo the State of Washington, residing t Kth , therein. Application, Petition, or Case #: SHPL V-108-90 Prellwitz (The minutes contain a list of the parties of.record.) November 4, 1991 OFFICE OF THE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND DECISION APPLICANT: DOUGLAS PRELLWITZ File No.: SHPL, V-108-90 LOCATION: NE 36th Street and Aberdeen Ave. NE SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Short Plat to subdivide 1.5 acres into four lots for future single-family homes and Variance to provide access to lots by a private road. SUMMARY OF ACTION: Planning Division Recommendation: Approval, with conditions PLANNING DIVISION REPORT: The Planning Division Report was received by the Examiner on September 3, 1991 PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Planning Division Report, examining available information on file with the application, and field checking the property and surrounding area, the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: MINUTES The hearing was opened on September 10, 1991 at 9:00 A.M. in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. The following exhibits were entered into the record: Exhibit #1 - Yellow File containing application, proof of posting and publication and other documentation pertinent to this request. Exhibit #2 - Vicinity Map Exhibit #3 - Short Plat Map Exhibit #4 - Topographic Map Exhibit #5 - Four (4) photos of site Exhibit #6 - Staff proposed Access Exhibit #7 - Profile prepared by Applicant's Engineer Exhibit #8 - Topographic Map Exhibit #9 - Plan of the Cul-de-sac on Aberdeen Avenue Exhibit #10 -Testimony read into report by David Gidlof, dated September 5, 1991 Exhibit #11 - Memo from Mark Pywell, dated October 8, 1991 Exhibit #12 - Applicant's proposal without the 20 ft. dedication along Aberdeen Ave. Exhibit #13 - Staff proposal with cul-de-sac and 20 ft. dedication along Aberdeen Exhibit #14 - Applicant's proposal with additional 20 ft. dedication along Aberdeen Exhibit #15 - Slope information with Staff notes Exhibit #16 - Revised Staff proposal , Y Douglas Prellwitz SHPL, V-108-90 November 4, 1991 Page 2 Exhibit #17 - Applicant's revised slope information Exhibit #18 - Seattle-King County Health Department Septic Information Exhibit #19 - Lot size septic standards The hearing opened with a presentation of the staff report by PAUL FORSANDER, Senior Planner. His testimony follows. The applicant's property is 1.5 acres and he wishes to divide that acreage into four lots to be developed later with single-family homes. The variance request is necessary to provide access to the lots via a private road. The topography of the site is steep, there are existing water utilities available but no sewer at this time, storm water flows in a northerly direction, fire protection is available to the site, transit, schools and parks are in close proximity. Lots will range in size from 16,000 to 17,500 sq. ft., determined by septic system requirements. Forsander said the plat is SEPA exempt,the request is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan designation, there will be approximately 2.7 dwelling units per acre, and the applicant must improve access to the site. The site has been perk-tested and results were positive. Staff felt the boundaries of the site are reasonable and would produce an average of 40 average daily trips, with the key issue for the proposal being access. Forsander said the applicant proposes access off 36th Street and the Transportation Systems Division has a concern about that access point due to the short distance between Aberdeen and the proposed private road. Staff has recommended that the short plat be revised so access is off Aberdeen. Staff is also not recommending any improvements along Monterey Avenue; slopes are less than 15%; a tree retention plan will be required; the proposal will not place any burden on public services; there is no on-site recreation proposed and staff suggested a monetary contribution to the city park fund; and Forsander said, prior to the issuance of any site preparation permits the applicant must submit a storm water plan. A second issue of concern is sewers. There are no sewer hook-ups available for the area at this time and staff is recommending that the applicant provide dry sewers and submit a covenant conditioning connection to the sewers. Planner Forsander read departmental recommendations into the record which covered approval by King County for use 'of septic systems and drain fields, submittal of a tree retention plan, voluntary contribution to the Master Trails Plan, amendment of short plat to provide access from Aberdeen Avenue, provision of temporary erosion control and construction management plans, and agreement by applicant that there will be no direct access from NE 36th Street. Responding for the applicant was TOM TOUMA, Touma Engineers, 15668 West Valley Highway, Seattle, 98188. Mr. Touma was concerned with staffs recommendation as to access being changed to Aberdeen. He said there is a 25% slope from the west to east on Aberdeen which makes the placement of half a road very difficult and asked if access is to be from Aberdeen then how would the two lots on the west side of the property access. He said the fire code requires no more than 500 ft. without a turnaround being provided and as it stands now the intersection of Aberdeen and 112th Street does not meet the 200 ft. measurement required between two roads, nor the required angle of intersection. Mr. Touma also questioned the staff report regarding traffic impacts and access points from either NE 36th or Aberdeen, saying conditions 4 and 6 are confusing and requesting clarification. CLINT MORGAN from Development Services reviewed what roads are open around the site, roads not open, those that are half-width and those full-width. North 36th Street has a 60 ft. right-of-way which is adequate. On the east side of the site Aberdeen is not open but there is a 30 ft. dedicated right-of-way. An additional 30 ft. would be required to align with the right-of-way on the south side of the intersection (the additional 30 ft. would come from the subject site). There will not be a planned intersection with 112th as the applicant indicated, the private street would end in a type of hammerhead so there would be emergency turnaround. Mr. Morgan said property to the east would also use the same access. The Examiner clarified that according to staff comments they would like an additional 30 ft. of right-of-way dedicated on the east side of the plat, which would change all of the lot dimensions. Mr. Morgan said staff objected to the private road intersecting with 36th Street because all accesses intersecting on a major street should be kept to a minimum. He said as property develops, less access to a community collector street is desirable so as not to impede traffic flow; said the applicant has not submitted any data to support his contention that the slopes entering the property from Aberdeen to the center of the site are too steep. He felt an Aberdeen access could be built to city standards. TOM TOUMA referenced a letter to Planner Pywell referring to topography and stating Aberdeen has a 25% slope. A previous letter of May 29, 1991, stated Lot #9 had already contributed to a right-of- way for Aberdeen. MR. DAVE GIDLOF, 10904 S.E. 66th Street, Renton 98056, spoke in support of this proposal. Mr. Gidlof read Exhibit #10 into the record supporting access from NE 36th Street. Douglas Prellwitz SHPL, V-108-90 November 4, 1991 Page 3 Additional testimony was received from the applicant, DOUG PRELLWITZ, 20335 S.E. 136th Street. Issaquah, who presented Exhibits #4 and #6. Prellwitz said current traffic on 36th Street ranges from 5 - 20 vehicles per day; to the west of his property is only one more half-acre undeveloped lot which, in the future, would produce only one more single family residence. This should not create any additional traffic impact on 36th Street. Planner Forsander mentioned that it may be'possible for staff to ask the applicant to run a topography profile of the area up to the hammerhead to see if the proposed access on 36th Street would be feasible. Clint Morgan from Transportation said there would possibly be adjustments made to bring the grade within the city code requirement of 25% and stated a 30 ft. dedication on Aberdeen was made by Clarence Hillman in 1907. The Examiner stated at this point that he would favor continuing this matter until a later date to have a topography map prepared, staffs recommendation on the map showing what dedication they want and access off Aberdeen Avenue, what lot sizes resulting from that requirement would be, and the applicant could provide similar information suggesting access from 36th Street. He said he must know how much dedication staff is requesting, what width, how the hammerhead would work and if the fire department could be provided a legal access. Mr. Touma asked for clarification of the area to be covered for the topography map and Planner Forsander responded the map should be a profile of elevations approximately every ten feet between Aberdeen Street and 36th Street and into the site. This matter was continued to 9:00 A.M. on October 15, 1991. The Examiner called for further testimony regarding this project. There was no one else wishing to speak, and no further comments from staff. The hearing closed at 10:00 A.M. The hearing resumed at 9:00 A.M., October 15, 1991, as the Hearing Examiner asked Mark Pywell, Project Manager, to give a brief background of pertinent information. MR. PYWELL reintroduced the Exhibits adding #7 - #9, and stated the concern that was discussed at the last hearing, the location of the private road that would provide access to the four proposed lots. The applicant has proposed to provide a hammerhead private road off of NE 36th Street. Powell continued, staff recommends access and hammerhead off Aberdeen Avenue; staff felt that Aberdeen would not ever be continued further to the North, as the interception with 112th to the north is too severe, there was already a 30 foot dedication along NE 36th and also along Aberdeen Avenue to the south, and that the cul-de-sac on Aberdeen would provide better access onto NE 36th street and flow of traffic in the area. Aberdeen Avenue will be coming through at the top of the ridge, which will provide 130 feet of sight distance between Aberdeen and the connection of NE 36th and 112th Place, while the applicant's choice of NE 36th would provide less than 100 feet. Traffic could not be seen until it had crested the ridge, and City Municipal Code and the American Association of State Highway Transportation both recommend approximately 200 - 250 feet of sight distance for intersections. Powell stated that NE 36th will eventually become a collector for the area, and is dedicated as a 60 foot right-of-way. Staff had discussed this recommendation with the Fire Prevention Bureau, which would be satisfied as long as there was a cul-de-sac located as proposed by Staff and the private access road was only 150 feet long. The other alternative, if a cul-de-sac wasn't provided at the recommended site, would be to provide an improved hammerhead, made bigger for fire equipment turn around. Pvwell continued, noting that Planning and Transportation Systems Division staff had looked at the site, reviewed the topography as shown on the City's contour map and the applicant's profile, but had not had time to review the cul-de-sac, as applicant provided it at the beginning of the public hearing. The grades shown on the contour map are acceptable to the Transportation Systems Division. Both the contour map and profile show a 12% grade down the length of Aberdeen Avenue, and a 10% cross slope. The east/west contour map shows 2.5% to 5% slope that Staff does not consider significant. Mr. Pywell felt the applicant's figures show a greater slope, 26%, but the contours given by applicant's engineer don't appear,to support that. The Examiner asked if Attachment B (Exhibit #11) demonstrated the lot as dedication required in the original application. Mr. Powell replied, the applicant would still need to dedicate 20 feet and with the applicant's proposed access, that 20 feet would be for the full length of the applicant's subdivision. MR. TOM TOUMA stated that he was concerned that there was some discrepancy between staff figures and his studies which showed east and west cross slopes at the lowest, 13.76%, and an average of 16.9% on the upper end, Exhibit #7 showed an average of 12.5% north and south, and slope grades in general steeper than those shown by staff, which would preclude development of the access and cul- de-sac off Aberdeen Avenue. The Examiner asked why applicant and staff had come to such a disagreement on what should be a purely technical matter, wondering how the differences could be so extreme; staff says there is a 10% slope and Mr. Touma maintains there is a 26.5% slope. Mr. Touma replied if the access of Aberdeen is the upper knoll, 70-100 ft. west of where NE 36th intersects Aberdeen, the knoll is more in the Prellwitz property and when he walked it, he felt he had the proper sight distance. He pointed out, if NE 36th will be a'collector street, the slope coming up to the knoll is over 15%, while the maximum allowable is 12%. To widen the road, the knoll would have to be taken down to 12% which would improve sight distance. Douglas Prellwitz SHPL, V-108-90 November 4, 1991 Page 4 CLINT MORGAN, Development Services, said staff, using applicant's drawing, found there was a 26% slope on the adjacent property, but the rise over the run calculated to be 18.5%, and the cross slope at Aberdeen between the existing right of way was calculated at 11.6%. The 11.6% is the 30 foot right- of-way itself, east to west, across the longitude of the road, using applicant's scale. What was measured was 90 feet between the right-of-way and their lowest point, rise over run of 16.2 feet. West of the west side of Aberdeen into the cul-de-sac the private road, taking the contour figures off the map, showed between 3-5% running west of Aberdeen to the hammerhead turn around, and 12.5% on Aberdeen. DOUG PRELLWITZ said the error that staff made in lot sizes was the critical point in developing the plat. When he met with a member of City staff on site, to go over the proposal of the Aberdeen entrance, he noted that he was at minimum amount of square foot allowable because of soil types. He felt Staffs new calculation of lot sizes was incorrect, and placing the cul-de-sac off Aberdeen would take 4,500 sq. ft. out of the property site, reducing lot sizes. The minimum size allowed is 16,000 square feet in order for the septic systems to function correctly. The Examiner entered Exhibit #11, memo showing lot sizes from Mark Pywell. Mr. Prellwitz stated those figures were not correct, supplying what he felt were correct numbers: Lot #1) 15,602, Lot #2) 14,512, Lot #)3 14,182, and Lot #4) 17,407. The Examiner noted that he did not have an Exhibit demonstrating the 20 foot right-of- way for Aberdeen dedication and that probably would shrink lots #2 and #3. Mr. Prellwitz replied that the dedicated land could still be used as reserve area as long as the road was not installed. With the installation of the cul-de-sac the size recommended by staff, and the dedication of the extra 20 feet being requested, the lots would not be large enough. The Examiner noted that Staff still recommends that a dedication be made along the main right-of-way of 20 feet width which in one case would be about 2,042 feet. Mr. Prellwitz said, if a 20 foot dedication is required for the whole eastern length of the property whether there is a road there or not, Lots #2 and #3 probably would not meet the perk requirements of 16,000 square feet. The Examiner said that if the 20 feet were dedicated, Lots #2 and #3 probably would not meet the minimum lot size requirements under either scenario. Mr. Prellwitz replied to the Examiner's question about sewers that the nearest sewer line is 1 1/2 to 1 3/4 miles. MR. PYWELL said staff also talked with other people in this area and there is a county subdivision that will be out along 112th and eventually, a sewer line coming, down 112th Place SE, within the next one to two years. The Examiner called for further testimony regarding this project. There was no one else wishing to speak, and no further comments from staff. The hearing closed at 9:40 A.M. The Examiner determined that additional evidence regarding the potential lot size was necessary to reach a decision in the matter and decided to reopen the public hearing. The hearing resumed at 9:00 A.M., October 29, 1991, as The Examiner stated the applicant seeks to subdivide approximately 1.5 acres of property into four single family lots located at Northeast 36th Street and Aberdeen Avenue Northeast. He noted that this was the third session for this item and that he wanted the parties to at least agree on the lot sizes in question under one configuration or another, and he noted there still appeared to be some discrepancies. Both planners who had worked on this project were in attendance, and he asked that the new exhibits be introduced, starting with number 12. PAUL FORSANDER, Senior Planner, introduced Exhibits #12 through #17, noting that the revised Staff proposal, Exhibit #16, had taken into consideration the cul-de-sac on the subject property and adjacent triangular property. Staff didn't feel that the cul-de-sac would be necessary considering the impact on the neighboring property and the fill required. He also stated that this configuration of a 50 ft. street with hammerhead was acceptable to the Fire Marshall, meeting access requirements. Forsander advised that Staff did not disagree with the applicant's figures on lot sizes as provided on the Exhibits, but had some concern about the amount of area required on the lots for septic, noting that the City cannot approve the short plat until proof of King County Health Department approval of this septic system is received. Forsander continued, stating he believed the minimum lot area for septic design in this location to be 15,000 sq. ft. The lot configurations that could occur with this sketch, (Exhibit #16) showed all of the lots except #4 meeting the 15,000 sq. ft. criteria. Lot #4 would be 14,900 which, with minor revisions to the hammerhead configuration, could be changed to 15,000 sq. ft. Also, the Health Department, indicated that possibly a lot of 14,900 sq. ft. could be approved. The main objection Staff had to the applicant's proposal was sight distance on NE 36th, which could be overcome with a substantial cut and some retaining structures. The Examiner stated that all of the lot dimensions on these new exhibits were agreed upon at that point; apparently septic requirements vary, due to soil types, and he asked whether the applicant had a letter stating the requirements. Douglas Prellwitz SHPL, V-108-90 November 4, 1991 Page 5 At this point, Exhibit #18, Seattle-King County Health Department Septic Information, was entered by Mr. Prellwitz. MR. PRELLWITZ noted the main objection that Staff seems to have to the proposal is sight distance from the proposed access to Aberdeen Avenue. Morgan,and Forsander have said they were at the site, but he didn't think they visited his site. He had gone to the site that morning and according to his calculations and on-site observations, a maximum of one foot cut would have to be taken out of the hill for a total view from the center of proposed Aberdeen to the center of the proposed project drive. According to his observations, the crest of the hill is a matter of 10 - 15 ft. from the center of the proposed Aberdeen to the east and there is a very slight drop to the center of proposed Aberdeen. He felt that with a one foot cut out of the hill there would be a totally unobstructed view from Aberdeen to the center of the project drive. The Examiner asked about the perk information and if changing the configuration of the lots would change any of the soil requirements. Mr. Prellwitz replied that perk data would remain pretty much the same, type 4 surface soils and type 3 soils underneath. In answer to The Examiner's question, Mr. Prellwitz said he was most concerned with the size of lot #4. At 15,000 sq. ft. or less, acceptability for septic would be questionable due to the combination of the soils, and there was no way of modifying the existing soils. The lot size numbers are for a mound system, which must be used with these type soils. Sand would be brought in and put on top of the soil, modifying the topography by mounding the soil. Mr. Prellwitz continued, the owner of the triangular property has expressed interest in developing and would need access off Aberdeen, however, with 20 ft. set backs, he didn't believe two lots could be developed from that piece. Mr. Touma made several comments, noting that across the triangle property the slope would be 21.8% and across Aberdeen Avenue, 16% while the 20 ft. dedication would be 14%, going into the property, then flattening out. He felt it would be difficult to put in a roadway with that type of cross slope. Mr. Forsander suggested that Mr. Morgan comment on sight distance, noting that the problem was not just to see from the entrance of the plat to Aberdeen but also to see a car approaching that crest. Clint Morgan, stated the adjustment of the slope just west of the property line was 14.7%. The slope going into the property from the current right-of-way line was a distance of 27 ft. or 20 ft. from the tight-of-way line. The slope there at 15% does not violate any standards. The Examiner said he understood that grades couldn't be in excess of 12%. Mr. Morgan answered that this was a cross hill, not a longitudinal slope. The longitudinal slope was only 12% on Aberdeen, which was acceptable. Regarding the developer-proposed access on 36th, Morgan stated that he and planner Forsander measured the distance back from applicant's staked right-of-way line to where the entrance would be and paced up the hill to a point where the top of the hill could just be seen from their location, which measured 100 - 110 ft., the best sight distance attainable. The American Association of State Highway Transportation indicates the very minimum stopping distance for 25 mph is 150 ft., so there would be insufficient stopping distance. Staff was not indicating what the cut would have to be, as that would need an engineering survey. Mr. Forsander commented on the 20 ft. set backs on the triangular parcel, saying the narrow point would probably only have 10 ft. set backs, depending on yard placement. He believed it could be platted into two lots. The Examiner called for further testimony regarding this project. There was no one else wishing to speak, and no further comments from staff. The hearing closed at 9:22 A.M. FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & DECISION: Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: 1.. The applicant, Tom Touma, filed a request for approval of a four lot short plat and a variance to permit access via a private roadway. 2. The yellow file containing the staff report, the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) documentation and other pertinent materials was entered into the record as Exhibit #1. 3. The Environmental Review Committee (ERC), the City's responsible official, determined that the proposal is exempt from an environmental assessment. Douglas Prellwitz - SHPL, V-108-90 November 4, 1991 Page 6 4. The subject proposal was reviewed by all departments with an interest in the matter. 5. The subject site is located on the north side of N.E. 36th Street, immediately west of the unopened right-of-way of Aberdeen Avenue N.E. The undeveloped Aberdeen right-of-way is 30 feet wide. 6. The 1.5 acre site is approximately 298.51 feet wide (east to west) by approximately 242.21 feet deep. 7. The site slopes downward from approximately 238 feet near the southeast corner of the site to 175 feet near the north property line. Staff characterizes the topography as less than 15 percent over the site. The site is also heavily wooded. 8. The subject site was initially annexed to the city with the adoption of Ordinance 4275 enacted in June 1990. The site was classified R-1 (Single Family; Lot size - 7,200 sq ft) with the adoption of Ordinance 4289 enacted in August 1990. The site retains that R-1 zoning. 9. The map element of the Comprehensive Plan designates the area in which the subject site is located as suitable for the development of single family uses, but does not mandate such development without consideration of other policies of the Plan. 10. The area in which the subject site is located is primarily developed with single family homes. Lot sizes in this area vary from the minimum required in an R-1 zone, that is approximately 7,200 square feet, to multiple acre lots, remnants of earlier platting patterns. 11. A twelve inch water line is located along Lincoln Avenue N.E. which is located west of the site. Storm water drains to the north with a drainage ditch located east of the site, along 112th Place S.E. (King County designation). 1.2. There is no sewer service available to the site. The site has passed a septic test which would permit development of a septic system to treat sanitary waste water. The minimum lot size permitted where a septic system will be used varies depending on soil types. The soils on this property suggest that a 15,000 square foot lot size is required for septic installations. 13. The site is served by the Renton School District which assigns schools on a space available basis. 14. Metro Transit runs a bus line east of the site along 112th Place S.E. 15. Kennydale Beach park is located approximately 1 mile west of the site. The Kennydale Lions Park is located a similar distance south of the site. 16. The applicant proposes dividing the subject site into four single family lots. Proposed Lots 1 - 4 run clockwise from the southwest to the southeast around a proposed hammerhead turnaround. The turnaround is proposed as a private road and it requires a variance which the applicant has requested. 17. As proposed by the applicant Proposed Lot 1 would 15,914 square feet, Lot 2 would be 17,067 square feet, Lot 3 would be 17,417 square feet and Lot 4 would be 16,146 square feet. (See below for staffs' alternative recommendations) 18. The proposed private road, a north-south roadway, would intersect 36th approximately 112 feet west of Aberdeen Avenue N.E. Staff is concerned that the proposed .private roadway will be too close to other intersections located along 36th. 36th is considered a collector roadway. Code provides that the offset be no less than 200 feet. Staff has recommended an alternative configuration for the private road. They recommended that the private road run west to east from the plat to Aberdeen. While this would also create an intersection closer than the recommended distance, Aberdeen would dead end at the private roadway. Staff believes that a dead end road would not compromise traffic safety as much as an intersection with 36th. Staff also recommended that no matter what the configuration, the proposed lots be prohibited from direct access to 36th for the same reasons - to avoid additional intersections along the collector street. Staff also indicated that the applicant neglected to include the required dedication along the east side of the property to bring Aberdeen up to standard width. A 20 foot dedication is required. 19. Staff also indicated that the sight distance (the distance that a driver can see along the roadway before obstacles - curves or hills - interfere) would be less than the recommended 130 feet with either configuration. Again, staff suggested the difference in the nature of the two roadways would permit the less than optimal distance along Aberdeen. • Douglas Prellwitz SHPL, V-108-90 November 4, 1991 Page 7 20. The applicant maintains that the topography of the site would preclude staff's configuration and further that the lots that would result would be too small to support-a septic system. The soil types represented by the applicant's testing indicate minimum lot sizes of 15,000 square feet. Staff contacted the Health Department which indicated that lot sizes just under the required minimum may be permitted under the proper circumstances. 21. The grade of an approximately east-west line located where staff has recommended that the access road be provided ranges in the applicant's estimate from approximately 16 percent across the Aberdeen right-of-way,-approximately 20 percent across the eastern twenty feet of the subject site to a relatively low angle of approximately 7 percent. Staff suggests that the 20 percent figure as you enter the eastern twenty feet of the site is approximately 15 percent. Staff indicates the overall slope meets city standards. 22. While the city's adopted grid system shows Monterey Avenue open along the west margin of the site, staff indicated that it would not be developed. 23. The development of four additional lots would increase traffic by approximately 40 trips per day (10 trips/dwelling). The development would increase the school age population by approximately 3 students and the overall population'by approximately 14 people. 24. The configuration requiring the dedication of 20 feet along Aberdeen but"maintaining the applicant's preferred north-south private access to 36th results in lots with the following lot area: Lot 1: 14,806 square feet Lot 2: 15,949 square feet Lot 3: 16,148 square feet Lot 4: 14,865 square feet 25. The original staff recommendation with an east-west private road with,access to a cul-de-sac at the end of an extended Aberdeen results in lots with the following lot area: Lot 1: 15,602 square feet Lot 2: 17,407 square feet Lot 3: 14,182 square feet Lot 4: 14,525 square feet 26. Finally, with the agreement of the Fire Department the staff modified the bulb-end cul-de-sac to a hammerhead turnaround. This configuration results in lots with the following area: Lot 1: 15,600 square feet Lot 2: 17,600 square feet Lot 3: 16,000 square feet Lot 4: 14,900 square feet CONCLUSIONS Short Plat 1. The proposed use appears to serve the public use and interest, although not without some problems. In order to approve a plat the city must determine that the proposed subdivision can adequately be served by the necessary.services. It must also determine that the plat will appropriately minimize its potential impacts. 2. The proposed plat with only four lots will create no undue impacts on city services. The main impact would be the additional traffic that four homes generate. The approximately 40 trips per day should not adversely affect area roads. The main problem related to traffic is the one identified by city staff. The applicant's proposed intersection with 36th appears to have two constraints. One is the distance between the private road and nearby intersections. The distance is less than that usually recommended. Intersections which are too close create hazards since complicated intersecting turns can occur or potentially overlap. Vehicles turning from these nearby intersections cannot see each other and turning movements could inappropriately coincide or block the views of each other. • Douglas Prellwitz SHPL, V-108-90 November 4, 1991 Page 8 3. The other problem, sight distance, is more important. Staff has determined that there is an insufficient sight distance for vehicles if the applicant's proposed north-south street intersects 36th. Staffs' recommendation would provide access first to Aberdeen and then to the collector street, 36th. The Aberdeen intersection would be at an established intersection of two public streets. It would create one less private intersection with the collector street and, according to staff, provide adequate sight distance. 4. While there was disagreement over whether one or the proposed other private street would provide safer or more convenient access to the plat the determination has to side with safety. If there is any question of safety, then staffs' recommendation should be followed. In addition, while staffs' suggested access method is not preferred by the applicant it does not seem to create any insurmountable obstacle to development of the plat. As the figures associated with lot area shown above demonstrate, lot sizes will not vary substantially in any of the configurations suggested with the exception of the applicant's initial proposal and that one did not account for the required dedication along Aberdeen, which is required in any event. 5. Where there is a reasonable disagreement over an issue that might jeopardize life safety like sight distance might, then the city must err on the side of caution. Even if the applicant were correct in his evaluation, the proposed access by staff provides a reasonable, if slightly, longer access. The most recent configuration, as approved by the Fire Department, appears to provide a lot size that would permit septic installation. If the Health Department determines that the lot sizes are insufficient for septic use then the lot lines between Proposed Lot 4, the under 15,000 square foot lot, and Proposed Lot 1 can be shifted. Additional adjustments can be made in a clockwise direction if necessary. 6. Staff has indicated that the resulting road grades from east to west meet city standards. Again, while there are disagreements over some of the information, staff reports that the roadway will meet city standards for overall grades. 7. To further reduce the number of private intersections along 36th or Aberdeen the applicant shall have to provide language on the face of the plat which prohibits direct road access to 36th or Aberdeen by any of the resulting lots. 8. The applicant has agreed to pay a mitigation fee to offset the anticipated impact to the city parks. The fee will be $150 per home for a total of $600.00. 9. While septic systems are permitted in the city, they do run a potential risk of failing. In addition, the goal is to provide safe sewer service to all properties. Therefore, the applicant will have to agree to connect to any sewer that may become available within 500 feet of the plat. In addition, to assure ease of compliance with this requirement the applicant shall have to install dry line sewers for each of the homes and provide appropriate easements determined by gravity feed requirements. 10. Finally, the applicant will be required to provide a tree cutting plan that complies with city regulations. Tree removal shall be subject to review and approval of staff as provided by the city regulations. 11. In the event that the health department disapproves of the septic system on the lots approved under this decision, the applicant may reduce the plat to three (3) lots subject to the same general requirements already set forth herein. Variance 12. Variances may be granted when the property generally satisfies all the conditions described in part below: a. The applicant suffers undue hardship caused by special circumstances such as: the size, shape, topography, or location where code enforcement would deprive the owner of rights and privileges enjoyed by others similarly situated; b. The granting of the variance would not materially harm either the public welfare or other property in the vicinity; c. The approval will not constitute a special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other property in the vicinity; and d. The variance is the minimum variance necessary to allow reasonable development of the subject site. • Douglas Prellwitz SHPL, V-108-90 • November 4, 1991 Page 9 The applicant's property appears ripe for the variance requested. 13. The applicant suffers undue hardship that results from the historic platting in this area. Early platting of the area carved out large lots without accounting for access to public streets from interior portions of those lots. Many similar lots were created in the city in the early part of the century when larger lots were preferred. The only reasonable way to achieve access to the interior portions of these lots are with short private roads. The nature of these roads, short and narrow, precluded public ownership since upkeep would be difficult and expensive. Under this circumstance a private road provides a reasonable alternative for access. The applicant will have to provide language on the face of the plat that requires each of the owners to maintain the private roadway subject to the approval of the city and provide the city with the option of maintaining the roadway and attaching a lien against the lots for costs incurred. 14. A private road developed as recommended by staff should not jeopardize the public health, safety or welfare, nor should it adversely affect private property. 15. The approval of this private road follows the standards set in this area of the city where access to interior lots has routinely been by private road. DECISION The proposed 4-lot Short Plat is approved subject to the following conditions: 1. The plat follows the general configuration of Exhibit #16, provided that lot lines may be shifted to provide reasonable square footage for each of the lots and the alterations are approved by staff and are limited to the minimum necessary to provide Health Department approval of a septic system for the plat. 2. The Health Department provides approval of the plat in writing prior to the recording of the short plat mylar. 3. The applicant shall include language on the face of the plat that requires each of the owners to maintain the private roadway subject to the approval of the city and provide the city with the option of maintaining the roadway and attaching a lien against the lots for costs incurred. 4. The applicant shall pay $150 per home for a total of $600.00 to offset the impacts on the city's park system. 5. The applicant shall include language on the face of the plat that requires the homes to connect to any sewer that may become available within 500 feet of the. plat. Each of the homes in the plat shall be equipped with a dry sewer and appropriate easements for gravity sewer lines. 6. The applicant shall, be required to provide a tree cutting plan that complies with city regulations. Tree removal shall be subject to review and approval of staff as provided by the city regulations. 7. The private roadway shall be subject to the approval of staff and particularly the Fire Department and shall run east-west from Aberdeen Avenue N.E. at a location approximately 90 feet north of N.E. 36th Street. • 8. The applicant shall develop Aberdeen Avenue N.E. as approved by staff and subject to review and approval of the Fire Department. 9. The applicant shall dedicate the easternmost 20 feet of the subject site for the widening of Aberdeen Avenue N.E. subject to the review and approval of city staff. 10. In the event that the health department disapproves of the septic system on the lots approved under this decision, the applicant may reduce the plat.to three (3) lots subject to the same general'requirements already set forth herein. ORDERED THIS 4th day of November, 1991. FRED J. KA 1VIAN HEARING E AMINER Douglas Prellwitz — SHPL, V-108-90 November 4, 1991 Page 10 TRANSMITTED THIS 4th day of November, 1991 to the parties of record: Paul Forsander Senior Planner City of Renton Tom Touma Touma Engineers 15668 West Valley Highway Seattle, WA 98188 Clint Morgan Development Services City of Renton • Dave Gidlof Richard James Realtors 10904 SE 66th St. Renton, WA 98056 • Doug Prellwitz 20335 SE 136th St • Issaquah, WA 98027 Mark Pywell Project Manager City of Renton Barbee Rattray 8730 112th PL SE Renton, WA 98056 Maggie Bonham Shannon O'Neil Realtors 5919 119th AVE SE Bellevue, WA 98006 TRANSMITTED THIS 4th day of November, 1991 to the following: Mayor Earl Clymer Councilman Richard M. Stredicke Don Erickson, Zoning Administrator Lynn A. Guttmann, Administrator Members, Renton Planning Commission Jim Hanson, Development Services Manager Gary Gotti, Fire Marshal Ronald Nelson, Building Director Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Jay Covington, Mayor's Executive Assistant Transportation Systems Division Valley Daily News Utilities System Division Pursuant to Title IV, Chapter 8, Section 15 of the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 P.M. November 18, 1991. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is ambiguous or based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for a review by the Examiner within fourteen (14) days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific ambiguities or errors discovered by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record, take further action as he deems proper. An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Chapter 8, Section 16, which requires that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk, accompanying a filing fee of $75.00 and meeting other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection or purchase in the Finance Department, first floor of City Hall. The Appearance of Fairness Doctrine provides that no ex parte (private one-on-one) communications may occur concerning pending land use decisions. This means that•parties to a land use decision may not communicate in private with any decision-maker concerning the proposal. Decision-makers in the land use process include both the Hearing.Examiner and members of the City Council. All communications concerning the proposal must be made in public. This public communication permits all interested parties to know the contents of the communication and would allow them to Douglas Prellwitz SHPL, V-108-90 November 4, 1991 Page 11 openly rebut the evidence. Any violation of this doctrine would result in the invalidation of the request by the Court. The Doctrine applies not only to the initial public hearing but to all Requests for Reconsideration as well as Appeals to the City Council. RECEIVEE • CITY OF RENTON MEMORANDUM OCT 2 5 1991 CITY OF FIENT0h HEARING EXAMINER DATE: October 25, 1991 TO: Fred Kaufman, HEARING EXAMINER FROM: Don Erickson, Principal Planner (Quiff) STAFF CONTACT: Paul Forsander, Senior Planner Mark Pywell, Senior Planner Clint Morgan, Engineering Specialist SUBJECT: ANALYSIS OF SHORT PLAT ALTERNATIVES Prellwitz Short Plat SH PL;V-108-90 This memorandum was prepared in response to the Hearing Examiner's request of October 17, 1991 for the applicant to provide accurate plat maps of the three alternative configurations under consideration, and staff's analysis of the resultant lot areas, key plat and street dimensions and slopes. NEW EXHIBITS The applicant has provided four exhibits: Exhibit A: Applicant's Proposal without a 20 foot street right-of-way dedication along Aberdeen Avenue NE. Exhibit B: Staff's alternative proposal with partial 20 foot street dedication and cul-de-sac dedication along Aberdeen Avenue NE. Exhibit C: Applicant's Proposal with a 20 foot street right-of-way dedication along Aberdeen Avenue NE. Exhibit D: Profile and Cross-Section Plan with a Profile of the Aberdeen Avenue NE right-of- way and Cross Section A-A showing topography through the staff proposed cul- de-sac and private road access to the plat. Staff provides an additional exhibit: Exhibit B: Staff's alternative proposal with partial 20 foot street dedication without the cul- de-sac dedication along.Aberdeen Avenue NE, and a larger "hammerhead" turnaround on the subject site. DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS Topographic Information Staff analysis of topographic information submitted by the applicant is based upon review of City of Renton aerial topographic maps, USGS topographic maps and field observation by Clint Morgan and Paul Forsander on October 24, 1991. Staff generally concurs with the topography shown on the Profile of the Aberdeen Avenue NE right-of-way. The slope along the Aberdeen right-of-way is approximately 10 to 12 statmemo • ,` Memo To Hearing Examiner Prellw. short Plat SH PL;V-108-90 October 25, 1991 Page 2 percent, which is within the City's standards for maximum slope for a residential street. Staff, however, disagrees with some of the topography shown on Cross-Section A-A, showing topography through the proposed cul-de-sac and private road access to the plat. The applicant shows the topography from the eastern property line/street right-of-way line westward to be 22.13 percent. We believe the slope to be 3 to 5 percent,which is well within the limits for construction of a cul-de-sac and private access road to the plat.. Lot Area Requirements Zoning The R-1, Residential Zone requires a minimum lot size of 7,200 square feet. Septic System Since the proposed short plat would utilize on-site septic systems, minimum lot area would be determined through the septic system design approval process by Seattle-King County Health Department. Section 9-12-8 N of the Subdivision Ordinance describes Sanitary Sewer requirements for Short Plat Subdivisions: "If a public sewer main or other adequate means of common disposal is not located within two hundred feet (200') or less of the nearest property line of the proposed subdivision, the subdivider may provide for the installation of an approved septic tank and disposal field system upon approval in writing for the Health Agency and in compliance with the City's applicable ordinances. in such cases, a dry sanitary sewer line shall be installed in the subdivision according to a sanitary sewer plan for the subdivision approved by the Department of Public Works. Side sewer lines shall be installed eight feet (8') into each lot. The Hearing Examiner may waive this requirement only if the area has not been included in the comprehensive sewer plan. The subdvider shall submit satisfactory evidence of favorable percolation rates comparable to the adopted requirements and standards of the Seattle-King County Health Department prior to approval of a subdivision dependent upon septic tanks as a means of sewage disposal. The subdivider shall provide covenants running with the land satisfactory to the City requiring the owners of the lots within the subdivision to hook up to and pay their proportionate share of any later extensions of a public sewer main adjacent to the subdivision." To date, the applicant has not provided any evidence of approval of the proposed septic design by the Seattle-King County Department of Health. The applicant stated at the last Public Hearing, on October 15, 1991, that the minimum lot area required for septic systems would be 16,000 square feet, however, no evidence has been provided off such a determination by the Health Department. Staff's discussions with the Health Department indicate minimum lot area requirements would depend upon soil types and percolation rates. Minimum lot areas required for septic systems generally range from 12,000 square feet up to 18,000 square feet. Until the applicant provides evidence of septic system approval by the Seattle-King County Department of Health, and documentation of minimum lot area requirements, there can be no approval of this short plat subdivision per requirements Section 9-12-8 N of the Subdivision Ordinance. stafinemo f - Memo To Hearing Examiner Prelly_ `,hort Plat SH PL;V-108-90 October 25, 1991 Page 3 Alternative Plat Configurations EXHIBIT A: Applicant's Proposal without a 20 foot street right-of-way dedication along Aberdeen Avenue NE. Transportation The are two problems with this plat configuration. First, there is Inadequate sight distance between the proposed private road access on NE 36th Street and the crown of the hill approximately 100 feet to the north. ASHTO recommends a minimum sight distance of 150 feet. Resolving the sight distance problem would involve substantial cuts, of up to 20 feet, along both sides of the NE 36th right-of- way and on private property. The second problem is a minimum 50 foot right of way (including a 20 foot dedication from the applicant) would be needed for the future construction of Aberdeen Avenue to allow development of the triangular parcel to the east of the proposal site. Lot Sizes All lots meet minimum zoning area requirements of 7,200sf: Lot 1: 15,914sf Lot 2: 17,067sf Lot 3: 17,417sf Lot 4: 16,146sf Conclusion Lack of good sight distance to the proposed access is the major deficiency with this configuration. This access alternative does not accommodate future access to the triangular parcel to the east of the proposal site. Note, staff has reviewed a pre-application for the triangular parcel. Transportation staff indicate access would only be permitted for Aberdeen, since there is insufficient off-set from the 112th Place intersection, and access would not be permitted from 112th Place because it is an arterial and because of steep slopes on the triangular parcel. EXHIBIT B: Staff's alternative proposal with partial 20 foot street dedication and cul-de- sac dedication along Aberdeen Avenue NE. Transportation This configuration alternative addresses the concern of inadequate site distance on NE 36th to the plat access (Aberdeen Avenue NE). There is 200 feet between. the centerline of 112th Place and the center line of Aberdeen Avenue NE. Construction of the cul-de-sac would require placement of fill on a portion of the private parcel to the east of the proposal site. As shown on the attached diagram (Exhibit B with staff drawn diagram and comments) the fill would form a tapered crescent from north to south.At its greatest,the fill would extend approximately 14 foot eastward beyond the right-of-way. Construction of the cul-de-sac would reduce development potential of the triangular parcel from two lots to one. Lot Sizes All lots meet minimum zoning area requirements of 7,200sf: Lot 1: 15,602sf Lot 2: 17,407sf Lot 3: 14,182sf Lot 4: 14,525sf Conclusion This alternative addresses staff's concerns regarding sight distances along NE 36th Street and access for future development of the triangular parcel to the east. Staff, however, believes the cul-de-sac is an unnecessary hardship on the subject site, and particularly the adjacent triangular parcel. Staff recommends deletion of the cul-de-sac and enlargement of the "hammerhead'on the subject site as an statmemo • ' Memo To Hearing Examine PreII; `'Short Plat SH PL;V-108-90 October 25, 1991 Page 4 alternative (See Exhibit E). This would still provide adequate fire access to both parcels. It would also result in larger lot sizes than the Exhibit B configuration: Lot 1: 15,600sf Lot 2: 17,600sf Lot 3: 16,000sf Lot 4: 14,900sf EXHIBIT C: Applicant's Proposal with a 20 foot street right-of-way dedication along Aberdeen Avenue NE. Transportation This configuration alternative addresses the right-of-way dedication concern discussed under Exhibit A, above. However the inadequate sight distance between the proposed private road access on NE 36th Street and the crown of the hill approximately 100 feet to the north remains. Lot Sizes All lots meet minimum zoning area requirements of 7,200sf: Lot 1: 14,806sf Lot 2: 15,949sf Lot 3: 16,148sf Lot 4: 14,865sf Conclusion Similar to Exhibit A's configuration, lack of good sight distance to the proposed access is the major deficiency with this alternative. Unlike Exhibit A, however, this access alternative does accommodate future access to the triangular parcel to the east of the proposal site. The primary problem with this alternative is the short distance between the proposed subdivision private road and Aberdeen Avenue NE. DEPARTMENTAL RECOMMENDATION 1. Staff recommends that the Hearing Examiner approve the proposed Prellwitz short plat (SH PL; V- 108-90) per previous recommendations contained in the Preliminary report to the Hearing Examiner dated Sept. 10, 1991,with the exception of Condition No.4 which would be replaced by recommendation 3 outlined below. 2. Until the applicant provides evidence of septic system approval by the Seattle-King County Department of Health, and documentation of minimum lot area requirements, there should be no approval of this short plat subdivision by the Hearing Examiner per requirements Section 9-12-8 N of the Subdivision Ordinance. [Note, Title 13 of the King County Board of Health Code requires Seattle-king County Health Department approval of the septic system design prior to approval of any short plat or subdivision]. 3. [Note this recommendation would replace condition 4 of the Preliminary report to the Hearing Examiner dated Sept. 10, 1991] The short plat shall be amended per Exhibit E to addresses staffs concerns regarding sight distances along NE 36th Street and access for future development of the triangular parcel to the east. As previously discussed, staff does not recommend the configurations shown in Exhibits A or C. Based upon further analysis, staff now believes the cul- de-sac shown in Exhibit B would be an unnecessary hardship on the subject site, and particularly the adjacent triangular parcel. Staff therefore recommends deletion of the cul-de-sac and enlargement of the"hammerhead" on the subject site as an alternative(See Exhibit E). This would still provide adequate fire access to both parcels and would also result in larger lot sizes. stafinemo MI TOU r�r� MA ENGINEERS pu� I"G‘ .' `. ' SEP 3 01991 R C iVtO September 27, 1991 Mr . Mark Pywell, AICP City of Renton Planning/Building/Public Works Department 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 RE: Prellwitz Short Plat - Aberdeen Profile and Cross-Section Plan, SHPL - 108-90 Dear Mr . Pywell : In accordance with the Examiner 's request, we have performed a topographic survey along Aberdeen Avenue NE existing right-of- way, and performed a cross-section depicting the existing slopes across Aberdeen Avenue NE right-of-way including the property to the east and existing 112th Avenue SE right-of-way. Enclosed for your review a plan and profile drawing depicting the existing slopes along that portion of Aberdeen adjacent to Mr . Prellwitz 's property. Should you desire additional information regarding this matter, please feel free to call me . C--- ) - ncerely /� Oau_c.c_t/4�' At-z----4,-- Mou ' r "TOM" Touma, P.E. Projec Engineer Enclosure cc : Mr . Doug Prellwitzl w/enclosure 15668 West Valley Highway • Seattle, Washington 98188 Phone: (206) 255-4100 • Fax: (206) 255-0945 .s AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION • Dolores E. Ashbaugh . ,being first duly sworn on-oath states acct. #51 0.6 7 that he/she is the Chief Clerk of the • ' , VALLEY DAILY NEWS _ . • Kent Edition • Renton Edition • Auburn Edition — - °NOTICE CIF PUBLIC HE-ARi ' ,RENTON HEARING EXAMI ER Daily newspapers published six (6) times a week. That said newspapers RENTON, WASHINGTON are legal newspapers and are now and have been for more than six A Public Hearing will be held by the Ren- ton Hearing Examiner at his regular meet- months prior to the date of publication referred to, printed and published ing in the Council Chambers on the second in the English language continually as daily newspapers in Kent, King floor of City Hall, Renton, Washington, on September 10, 1991 at 9:00 a.m.to consid- County, Washington: The Valley Daily News has been approved as a legal er the following petitions: newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for PRELLWITZSHORTPLAT , King County. SHPL;V-108-90 The applicant seeks to subdivide 1.5 acres into'four lots for the future con- • The notice in the exact form attached, was published in the Kent Edition struction of single-family homes. The xx , Renton Edition xx , Auburn Edition xx , (and not in applicant also seeks approval of a vari- • '• ance to provide access to the lots by a supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers private road.The project is located on during the below stated period. The annexed notice a public notice._ the northwest corner of the intersec- tion of NE 36th Street and the exten- --#634`3. Ci.ty. of .Renton,• not.i.ce: of public .he.ar.ing sion of Aberdeen Ave. NE.Legal descriptions of the files noted .. ,above are on file in he Development Ser- August: .29,. .1 9:91 vices Division,¶ • r a M nicipal Build- was in Renton. _-_ ---- published on s 'J.,All•iinterested persons fiCIGEE petitions - • are invited to be present at the Public Hear- The full amount of,the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the ing on September 10, 1991 at 9:00 a.m.to 3 4..9 7 �, express their opinions. sum of$ • h Published in the Valley Daily News on •,August ga 9 0 ME er • , .'JliAlt,-All./. (..7 .. _ _ ' Subscribed and sworn before me this • 5 t h day of 5 A p t 19 .91 • • Notary Publ c for the Mate of Washington residing at Auburn, King County, Washington VDN N87 Revised 4185 • ................................ n=iMiMNOMBNCITY OF RENTON CURRENT PLINNING DIVISION On the 84"/ day of C)&\co...tr , 19 , I deposited in the mails of the United States a sealed envelope c9ntainin.gt gennto 412. 4.G ialln Ek vu. .so-v, Kork. Weti documents . This information was sent to: Name Representing • "TotLL 1Doul fRPtc witt. • • vnt.-Try-4 • • •• . _• • _ _ • • • - (s ignature Of Sender) Simi kx... k . • Sub ribed and sworn to me this — day of etril-ILM 19 / • Notar - ublic and for the Stat . f Washi ton residing at th rein. . ............................... •,. 1!` . • • 1 CI No • . 3 CI) *ft. P4j81-0 TiVi • 63 VCA9. i0Pftei Sk)1- •'''' 7, 44V88Afirts:10 -11(` t". • >-: CITY: (. 'r' RENTON Kra Hearing Examiner Earl Clymer, Mayor Fred J.Kaufman October 17, 1991 To All Parties of Record: Re: Douglas Prellwitz. SHPL, V-108-90 This office, has determined that it has no choice but to once again open the hearing for the above matter. In reviewing the record this office has found irreconcilable differences in the lot areas determined by staff and that found by the applicant. These differences are significant enough that it is impossible to reach a decision in this matter. The staff recommendation and the applicant's extrapolation of numbers from that recommendation are too far -apart to allow this office to comfortably arrive at a reasoned conclusion. • Therefore, this office has determined that the hearing will be reopened on Tuesday, October 29, 1991 at 9 : 00 am in the City Council Chambers. The applicant shall prepare two accurate plat maps at the appropriate scale demonstrating .both the applicant' s proposal with 'and without a 20 foot dedication -along the Aberdeen right-of-way .as well as a separate plat map to the same scale showing the staff recommendation for an east-west private roadway. These maps shall further demonstrate the appropriate yard setbacks and building envelopes, accurate lot size in square feet and the dimensions of hammerhead turnarounds, property line lengths, and the proposed cul- de-sac. For clarity, these shall be, separate maps that independently demonstrate the .appropriate features of each plat without showing data applicable to one of the other configurations. The applicant and staff may optionally rework the grade and slope calculations and submit those once again on separate exhibits. The applicant shall submit this information to staff not later than 5: 00 pm, Wednesday, October 23 , 1991. Staff shall either. verify or rebut the information in a memorandum to this office submitted not later than 5: 00 pm, Friday, October 25, 1991. Staff shall convey to the applicant by phone or fax or the applicant shall call for that - information_ not later than the close of business that same day. This will provide the applicant at least one day' s notice of staff' s determination. Any disagreements regarding these determinations shall be argued,at the public hearing. This does not preclude the applicant and staff from discussing these matters jointly prior to the public • hearing. nonce _ inni\ 11c_'SOZ I e While the time lines are of short duration, this office believes that enough time has been spent on this matter and that the public hearing schedule requires that the item be heard on the date specified above. Sincerely, FRED J. IUFMAN HEARING EXAMINER FJK:wmb cc/. Doug Prellwitz Tom Touma Dave Gidlof Larry Warren, City Attorney Don Erickson, Principal Planner Gary Gotti, Fire Marshall Paul Forsander, Sr. Planner Clint Morgan, Engineering Specialist Mark Pywell, Planning . .. . ..... : » is <;�<1 .::. �� :' �i : >Z:T.Y...... .::.I2E N.T.O N. ..:. ...........:.::::.:::: •:: ..:...................---- ... >":.CURRE N_TNMUff:MUNMNMATT IDA. .Ifi...O V .:::::.:�..::.:.:.:.. .:..:..::..:.:...:...:...,.�:....:..•. IE.::BY>::;I�.AILING ::::::::::::::<::::::::::::�::::::;:::::::::::::::::< ::::<:::: On the 4.b day of Se.p-k,{4,kkoky , 19 91 , I deposited in the mails bf the Un ' ted States a sealed envelope containing 4.e. 4Yt� of . • documents . This information was .sent to: Name Representing • • . mom —Y"otLrn0. • • Co�`as tom'-rill wiz. - - . Kin -il • lar %he _ �vus . . • • • • • (Signature of Sender) k .. puic.r Subscribed and sworn to me this 4t"` day of , 19 Q l . I • ary - blic in and for the State Was ington residing at V l �tln,�. therein J : Pz 5:ec 0Name';. :. .: •: P.ro'J::ect::::Naimbei:.:. �y:�.�} .:4;i;:.: ::r:. • • '• .` f `,"'• 8t v- y3{ 1-.. 1 `'T 1, 4:•i:?•ii::?:?4}:�:�::�:::�:�i:�:4:�:J:n:<�:�i:i:•:i:•:�::•::4;.;r;.:•is6i:•i:•:>:•:':�:i�:i�:�:{.:.:.::Qii:4i:•,y.::.i:.i:::;i:.7(:::::�:.is�i:•:,::.::.i'':::::is�:::�:�i:�::�:i�:�:S�i:�i:�:t�i:{.':•i:•:i'i:ii:�:�i}i:<::: is�::i�i:�::�:i:•:i:•:i :::.�:.•:{.?i?:J:•iiii:4:�?:.}:.}ii:�i:�}:�:{.iii:6:•:�ii:�}i:6i?iii}ii?ii?}?ii?i:.:.....:.:..:...v:..:ii.....:.,.:..:..............ii:4:�:.}:4:•ii:�}iYi:;•iii:�:�:�i:�i:�iiiii?i:•iii:•;{.:.?}i?iiii:.}:::�::::�::::::i•:w� >> :P•� BLS. >`H�At� G .................:::: 'Z.:•:•::ti•::•::?:•:':�::?•::tiC•::':-::'::ti:":':'::':'::::':':::::':.::.:��:�:::.:::•:'::':::'::•:::':::ti.:.:;:;:�:;::::•:�:':•::tiV:ti;•:':;•:'::':::;:f:':�:•::V:�rti;:;:•::tititi'::;:.;;:.::;:":'::::::•':::::•:':•:•::•:i:•:'::.i::":ii:':•:'r:':'::':-:'::::::•:::�•:�::: r ir..•::':':':•:'i::•:•:::•::':':'::'::::ti':'::;:•:'':':;:::'::':'::?'::'::':{'is::•:':::':::':::•:::::':'::::'::':'::'::::'::::���1:::::•:•:::::is::::�:�:::•:•:':•:V::::•:::'::f::::::::'i:;:':;:';':':'::::i':':::::':::•:'::•::•::•:•::::::::::::'::�:�:::•::•:':': ::':'::::'�•::;:':•::. 1......:.........................'isvi:i�:iv:ti{4i}:�i:C :C•i:•:�:ti4:i'i:i'::':{.:{4:ii•:«{i•} gE �>t:;`:`'1 > < »> <>< >> '<' > > <> < :>CO•••• NGAT9:o0ANA ::••••N••:•.• Q: 9 ::COUMC(LGHAIUIBER%SECdNDFLO0F3 :WORM IJ .:: .::.. .....:.:.:::::::::::::::::::::::::.::.;:;.>:.>:.:.>:.:�:.:.;:.:.:.;:;. �,,.-,..•ril t o d r in<whi ::theywill:be:heard <::It. m <will> >call.edfor:-hearin ;atthe::discretronof:the;Hearin ::Examine. ::;::::;::::::;;:::;<:::::::: PROJECT NAME: VALLEY GARDENS HEALTH CENTER REZONE PROJECT NUMBERS: ECF;R-053-91 ' PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Rezone of an existing 40,000 sf medical office building currently designated as P-1 (Public Use) zone to 0-P (Office Park) zone to allow for a greater range of permitted uses for building leasing. The project is located at 601 South Carr Road. PROJECT NAME: PRELLWITZ SHORT PLAT PROJECT NUMBERS: SHPL;V-108-90 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant seeks to subdivide 1.5 acres into four lots for the future construction of single-family homes. The applicant also seeks approval of a variance to provide access to the lots by a private road. The project is located on the northwest corner of the intersection of NE 36th Street and the extension of Aberdeen Ave. NE. DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING APPLICANT: Tom Touma PROJECT NAME: Prellwitz Short Plat FILE NUMBER: SH PL;V-108-90 LOCATION: N.E.36 Street and Aberdeen Ave..N.E. A. SUMMARY AND PURPOSE OF REQUEST: The applicant seeks to subdivide 1.5 acres into four lots for the future construction of single-family homes. The large lots are required in order to provide an area for septic systems. The applicant also seeks approval of a variance to provide access to the lots by a private road. B. GENERAL INFORMATION: 1. Owner of Record: Douglas Prellwitz 2. Applicant: Tom Touma 3. Existing Zoning: R-1, Single-family residential. 4. Existing Zoning in the Area: Single-family residential, R-1. 5. Comprehensive Land Use Plan: Single-family residential and Greenbelt. 6. Size of Property: 1.5 acres 7. Access: N.E.36 Street 8. Land Use: Vacant land 9. Neighborhood Characteristics: North: Single-family residences. East: Single-family residences. • South: Single-family residences. West: Single-family residences. C. HISTORICAL/BACKGROUND: Action File Ordinance Date Annexation 4275 June 25, 1990 R-1 4289 August 29, 1990 D. PUBLIC SERVICES: 1. Utilities a. Water: A twelve inch water line runs along Lincoln Ave. b. Sewer: Sanitary Sewer Is Not Available c. Storm Water Drainage: Storm.water flows in a northerly direction. Closest drainage conveyance on record Is a ditch running north along east side of 112th Place. . prelmrpt PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER Prellwitz Shortplat PUBLIC HEARING September 10, 1991 Page 2 2. Fire Protection: Provided by the City of Renton as per ordinance requirements. 3. Transit: Metro transit route 240 runs along 112th Place. 4. Schools: a. Elementary Schools: Hazelwood Elementary School is located approximately one mile to the north. b. Middle Schools: McKnight Middle School is located approximately 1 1/4 miles to the south. c. High Schools: Hazen High School Is located approximately 2 1/2 miles to the, i; southeast. 5. Recreation: Kennydale Beach Park is located approximately 1 mile to the west and, Kennydale Lions Park is located approximately 1 mile to the south. E. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE ZONING CODE: 1. Section 4-31-5, R-1 Residential Zone. F. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR OTHER OFFICIAL CITYy! DOCUMENT: 4' 1. Northeast Renton Plan, City of Renton Comprehensive Compendium, 1981 (pgs. 55-60) 2. Residential Goal, City of Renton Comprehensive Compendium, 1986 (pgs. 14-16). 3. Section 9-12, Subdivision Ordinance, Renton City Code. G. DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS: 1. The applicant, Douglas Preliwitz, is proposing to subdivide an existing 1.5 acre parcel into four lots ranging in size from 15,914 square feet (0.36 acres) to 17,417 square feet (0.39, acres). This will allow for the construction of four single family homes at a later date. This' lot is part of the area that was annexed into the City of Renton last year as part of the Duncan Annexation. At that time, the area was designated for single family residential development and zoned R-1. The proposed short plat is consistent with the existing area development which consists of single-family homes. The subject property is heavily vegetated with a variety of trees and shrubs. It should be noted that prior to the removal of any trees the applicant will need to provide a Routine Vegetation Management Plan to the satisfaction of the Development Services Division of the Department of Planning/Building/Public Works. 2. The application is exempt from environmental review under WAC-197-11-800 of the SEPA regulations. 3. Approval of the Short Plat is based on several factors. The following criteria have been, established to assist the decision maker in reviewing the plat: a. Compliance with Comprehensive Plan The proposed development is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan designation of Single Family Residential. The Comprehensive Plan defines the Single Family Residential area as an area intended for detached single family �i dwelling units --not exceeding a density of six dwelling units per gross acre--and related low density uses. The proposed project provides a density of 2.7 units per gross acre. Section IV.A.1. of the City of Renton Comprehensive Plan states that a balance should be sought or maintained between housing and the available access; utilities, and community facilities. The applicant will need to improve the access to prelmrpt PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER Prellwitz Shortplat PUBLIC HEARING September 10, 1991 Page 3 the subject property in accordance with the Code requirements and standards. The size of the lots was determined by the need to provide on-site septic systems until a public sanitary sewer system is installed In this area. Section IV.A.9. states that housing alternatives should encourage a variety of choice in architectural design, physical location, building arrangement, and ownership patterns. The proposed short plat would allow for the construction of four single-family residences by the future lot owners. The proposed lots (ranging in size from 15,914 s.f. to 17,417 s.f.) are larger than those normally provided in the R-1 zone (minimum lot size in this zone is 7,200 s.f.). These lots would be ideal for those who desire a more rural life style but still would like to be located within the City. b. Compliance with underlying (or proposed)zoning designation The'project site is designated R-1, Single Family Residential, on the City of Renton Zoning Map. The proposed development would allow for the future construction of four single family dwelling units. The proposed lot layout allows an adequate area for building pads and setbacks required within the R-1 zone. The minimum lot size permitted in the R-1 zone Is 7,200 s.f. This shortplat provides four lots ranging in size from 15,914 s.f. to 17,417 s.f. These lot sizes are compatible with other existing lots in this area of the City. c. Reasonableness of Proposed Boundaries 1) Accessibility The planned future development of four single-family homes on this site, as facilitated by the proposed subdivision, is anticipated to generate approximately 40 ADWVTE's,which is not expected to result in significant traffic Impacts. Staff have noted, that off-site Code-required transportation improvements will be needed if the plat Is approved, including roadway plans, curbs, gutters, sidewalks and street lighting. The applicant will need to provide half-width road dedication and improvements on the east and south boundary of the project site. The applicant prefers the use of a private road off of NE 36th Street for access to each of the proposed lots. This alternative would be less expensive then the construction of a half-width road built to City street standards along the Aberdeen Ave. right-of-way. The Transportation System Division staff recommend that the private road connect with Aberdeen Ave. Instead of 36th St. The City Codes require private roads to be off set from existing Intersection by a minimum of 200 feet. The private road, as proposed by the applicant, is only 111 feet from the proposed intersection of Aberdeen Ave. and 36th Street. A road easement exists south of 36th Street and a 30 foot easement exist north of 36th Street for Aberdeen Ave. Staff feels strongly that this development should not eliminate the potential for Aberdeen Ave. to be constructed in this area. Staff will recommend to the Hearing Examiner an agreement be recorded on the face of the plat that the property owners of Lot 1 and Lot 2 shall not be allowed to gain access off of 36th Street as driveways In this location would be hazardous as traffic levels on 36th Street increase. The adopted grid system for this area indicates a Monterey Ave. will be constructed along the west boundary of the project site. Transportation Systems Division staff have indicated that the applicant would not be required to provide improvements for this street. 2) Topography The subject property is fairly level with slopes less than 15 percent. The property is vegetated with a variety of trees. The applicant will be required to provide a tree retention plan in order to maintain the character of the site and the surrounding area. prelmrpl PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER Preliwitz Shortplat PUBLIC HEARING 'September 10, 1991 Page 4 3) Relationship to Existing Uses The area adjacent to the project site has been developed as a single- family residential area. The lot sizes within the area range from approximately 10,000 square feet to over a one acre in size. The proposed development, lots ranging in size from 15,914 square feet to 17,417 square feet, can be considered compatible with the adjacent land uses. d. Compliance with the subdivision regulations 1) Streets The subject property abuts NE 36th Street and the proposed location of Aberdeen Ave. NE. The Transportation System Division has indicated that, the applicant will need to make the Code required dedications and improvements along both of these streets. 2) Lots The applicant is proposing to create four lots from the existing 1.5 acre; lot. The proposed lots would be approximately 121'x 151'. The size and;, dimension of these lots meet the standards and requirements of the' Zoning and Subdivision Ordinances. The corner lots have been designed;, to be slightly wider(approximately 120'vs 118')than the interior lots. 'y e. Would the short plat create a burden on public services (timeliness)? !' 1) Police and Fire Police and Fire Prevention Bureau staff indicate that sufficient resources, exist to provide service to the proposed development provide that Code- required improvements and fees are provided. '' 2) Recreation The applicant has not proposed to provide on-site recreation facilities within this plat nor have regional impacts been addressed within this proposal. The applicant will need to review the Parks Comprehensive Plan and the proposed Master Trail Plan with the Parks Section of the Community Services Department staff. In order to mitigate both on-site and regional recreation impacts the applicant will be encouraged to make a voluntary contribution of$600.00 ($150.00 X 4 Lots). 3) Schools It can be anticipated that the proposed project, once developed for single- family homes, will generate approximately 3 school aged children. The Renton School District does not anticipate that this number of students will have a negative impact on the school system. 4) Storm Water Prior to the issuance of any site preparation permits the applicant will need to provide a final storm water analysis and install improvements in accordance with the King County Surface Water Design Manual adopted by the City of Renton. 5) Public Water and Sanitary Sewer Utilities Water Utilities staff note that a water line can easily be extended along the frontage of the proposed subdivision by the applicant to provide service to the proposed lots. There are no City sewer lines that can easily be extended to serve the proposed subdivision. Dry lines would have to be installed with the future homes served by on-site septic systems until a sanitary sewer line can be extended to the area. PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER Prellwitz Shortplat PUBLIC HEARING September 10, 1991 • Page 5 Staff will recommend to the Hearing Examiner that the applicant record an agreement on the face of the plat requiring that the lots will be connected to the sanitary sewer system when it becomes available. H. DEPARTMENTAL RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommend that the Hearing Examiner approve the proposed Prellwitz short plat (ShPl-108- 90)with the following conditions: 1. The owner shall provide evidence of King County Health Department approval for the use of septic systems and drainfields for Lot #1, Lot #2, Lot #3, and Lot #4 prior to the issuance of site preparation permits. Note 1.a: Septic systems may be permitted as no connection to sewer lines is feasible at this time. In the event that connection to a King County or City of Renton sanitary sewer system does become feasible at a future date, the owner(s), will be called upon to make that connection. The applicant shall provide the City with a covenant on each of the proposed lots that requires the land owner to connect with a City or County sewer system within 12 months of such a sanitary sewer system becoming,available within 500 feet of any proposed property line. The covenant shall be noted on the face of the plat and recorded with the title report for the subject properties. Note 1.b: Dry line sewers shall be installed for each of the proposed lots to facilitate the connection into a sanitary sewer system at the time the sewer system becomes available. 2. The owner shall provide a description of the extent to which existing trees and plants on proposed Lot #1, Lot #2, Lot #3 and Lot #4 will be removed, or disturbed by the proposed short plat. This inventory/plan shall be provided to the satisfaction of the Development Planning Section prior to the public hearing for the short subdivision. A note shall be recorded on face of the plat indicating that existing trees shall be retained In accordance with the approved tree retention plan. 3. The applicant is encouraged to meet with the Community Services Department to discuss this project's impacts on the City's recreational facilities and proposed Master Trails Plan. The applicant is encouraged to make a voluntary contribution of$600.00 ($150 x 4 lots) to the Parks Department to mitigate the impacts of this project on area recreation facilities. 4. The applicant shall, in order to address City policy/regulations and mitigate traffic Impacts, amend the short plat so that the proposed private road has its access from Aberdeen Ave. NE. An agreement shall be recorded on the face of the plat and recorded with the title report limiting access to Lots 1 and 2 to the private road and not from NE 36th Street. 5. The applicant shall, in order to mitigate the adverse impacts of construction, provide a temporary erosion control plan and a construction management plan to the satisfaction of the Department of Planning/Building/Public Works. Note: The applicant shall provide all required improvements (e.g. utility connections, road improvements) in accordance with the City of Renton Municipal Code. 6. The applicant shall, in order to mitigate potential impacts to the flow of traffic on N.E. 36th Street, record an agreement on the face of the Final Plat that each of the four lots will gain" access from the proposed private road and that no direct access from N.E. 36th Street shall be permitted. prelmrpt �_ illir ii • • \ itewo 1 SE 68'-51 A000• , 00000.• .00000 •0°0°0°0°0°0• ;, I j Ill 111 itRi, ial tsto Mir I 76 sT Iffice Park ' ::•::::• • mom • AlMino.•'.::Yaii wog . '' / wii. .... NOTI asi-Public ... •. �i Aliiiiill ? - -- - -- — • f•.;: : :;:::: I F I NA r >•:` 1 ` DES I :•;/,ee� I 111M:■■. .j ' THE - Agec'' . .n•mr' G E N E ,ir: . , stria) i RATH /;,, • .,..‘� WitHk. 5 1 • i, 1 USES ,,,.k ,.., :. . . . . . .,..,. . . 4 )ring Park :. ' / ' ., - =... " `e r,,,r.1t e Option ■ _, t:�::: ;,;.; 1985 % 1_ 11U■■!:iiiiikl�•,' c... _ V �L • .c^• .; _ :.r..r';° �� — .,rr. J • • V�, �.(:'�.. �0t• � v� � GC"o;V•w cr 't';,,. u, .G -;.?._:n,a.:. .., • .•. '‘. iteN 414.5....%,;::,:.;.,:: is r.V,5• .030010.0.00.00.00000/00: ti %Vill • 1-1.: c Ail... . .,A LAKE u -:::::::A:: �rw - . eAliii::::t•••••),"`•"(• 'l HINGTON W. . ...,i. N • all wrissro ... - ._.-.- ' rgi• ■■ 00000•0000.pr..e.iii A. Julius. - rlit !LIMYr • • • • • • '' IIII 1.:::iii1:74-7...tralwriwr• .•000• .� • • • • • • • • , - 3 ." 000c ��'•,:',.','••,.,.riini wI■•/■•wig •C \ •�i• t1 — • • • • • •.• • • frit; �o.) �i' . i _� 11"11 g •• , :•:•::......:.........t .°°°°g°�, •• • •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• • • • 4•.1 •• , .� • 1 o°o°o° °• •• •• • • • •▪• • • • • • •• • • •• 1\■■■■ ' O°°ogox • • • • • • • • • • • � I IIzy,. ��1 ° 000000000 • ••• •, • • • • • • •• • •• .`.y��►� .•o000000000 .,�•°o°o°o o �'•� � • • • • • • • • •' •' '�' ''r i 1111.1 • + °O0000.0000 0°°°0°o°g • • • • • • • • • •• • i� `� 'AS r .°o°• ,o 0 og000• P • • • • •. • • a ,e �' 0•: :1?ggggda°,°°o • • • • •• • • •• • • • •err w I .1.1 .0• 88 4 , , 111111 :..:.:.::.;:.:::::::::::::::.:::::•::::.:::::::::.::::::::::::: .II<—''.':'::* •i'000°o o°: l • • • • ••• • • •' •• fcj a. � 1.• _'t' ,o°°000 000 t • • • • • . • J: ili .5• e • • , • • • • • !''r''''.1 EMIR I ' • MO • ' • • t Medi ..1■ .00°000 o°o rIiii 11i •• • • ', • - s I :`(ai II o o g 0 0' • nl■I� , • / I V, o•o i nA. Y. 0 0 0 0 0' ▪ �'•.11■ 00•00 .41 • Nr • 11111 .� ::vr, °000 og°o°o ', ■II• (� . n 000. !:1 `1\ :•:II o 0 0 0 0 000000: I '"i� r �, ' _.n \� ° ° 8 ° ° °� I., �� _ ter; ,0000°O°°°000• O°O°• ' .h•: • 1, „ [, -':-: .7}_..: , '�= o. O o: 1 _1 I - ;.�. o 0 7�1i :11�'• dE .. III' fp t� •0000 .000.000000.0.000000. 000°0000°o°o• 7 1 I - • 0000000000•000000000 "1 •00000.000•0..00.0000• 7■■•.■. W 00 000•a° o.000 0 00 0 ■•0 00 � ■� r v o ■ o .00.00000 00 00 0 LA ND 00 OOO :•N: USEOG °it, • °°OG°.° ELEMENT .UGOO ° .00°° °°° ° °°° ° :�" •000000000•000000000• .0:;'���:r �� �: .... ...... ... I ;.,'�•, 'Fyn'•• •0 000000.000000°O°O �,,: O°°• i,'Sin le Fam 00000000000000• I',.: 19 lly : Commercial 000°o° •o o o o°o°o°o°00 0 0.3 o o°o°o°o°o, ............::::::; ,f •0000• 0000000000000000000. r • 00000•�:'..'• •oo_00000000000000000 ���. :::::•i:::::::•.' P� •00000, - 00000000o if •,• ;r. Law •00000 :'I%-' •00000000t , D L 00000•Density °°°t Y ..00 oo• I o0 0o P -:�• I �g. •,• 0000 o - Office / °° °• A Multi Famil Office Park • o°° °° (:. y \\�\ .� .0000000. ,l?`', gg •000•oo0.o•o •.q'' Medium Density ��o iJ •�rrMti•• -•� 'r) '•,illl :> j� .:.......:: - Public/Quasi- s::>:' F „'Multi Family „o„o„ Public ■►•',,o•';� �••,,;;f , ••r„,�.,., .,,,.,r,.t�i;G•{;,�y ' : riii mow► rr:• y5.. , .r..3:1i9. ?,..Q.'`Jf' Pm' :�s�� r 44;' ,a, '•. .o•••+,:+J''J +�+i..;?yQ'y r;, '3 voll0. ill High Density ,4. �Y?�si,� �:, a• .n 7:r°:f,• �•rr ti . +'� ■■, � �; Multi-Family1 Light Industrial / � ;i.• ,;�•� ',r, „o r•5 •� �•,:: • .••: ■•1 X%f : .•.e ,O✓.•.;, `r7�.?i'o '�r1)3n';• 4'• o..:. `• 1..., • : • NMI al ' Recreation •••••• _ .•e�■ •J, �I�� , �•(, t r[�j d��`of�.cdF- ;(J o\I , I••••••[ Heavy Industrial .'.,n..I ' ..• c i. tt,¢r,.:"[:.: '3 !,• t^•�F;�• r t,a CV 9- „.1t�.. .' °•t,•,+. ., MK' % •1 r4; r Greenbelt ___ :rt;^r;C,'..7„J•'., .•0 • .•.V.'C-1;.• i)'c7•:. r �.�.C. NSco •�V..1)6 si, '.. ■1 {fa"•1. ,.•1;. •'c..o r•,'. t . ■I -- Manufacturing ,,, , •�•,• •. ,• tau. ,� t• 8„c. _ Park 1 '� Z., a' >;'a1,(. a. ,. �C(• :%::• ;•v ■.I ° / Multi ,� .0:4 Ve•. 1,,. 1•„.,.tv 5 ^r. r q-C t'= . �•1 pie Option .iV,E •, .44Ct• pj[t,,t1,�,c, .n,�'.a ,: ,n,a;, .�� �.,[r^ C'-•(:Y: f }.t',• •F!`Jc(:,�"'i•• Nni'mii�i•°o° eisi`.�r • •`,h••rili .c ;'H•,[.�.(i�,..,, : .c� o `^C�'(?r �'. , fly s ' '; 1 "�i. .■ .2°n ,a c `: +.o o. t• „t�„l"'n n�+^nfi)n':^<"3,r•Ot:��0.;' 7°r}'i?r. c. 1 F'�(rl{r//'�;Sa.'•cc rJ f 1K: • !I ,REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: 1-10-70A1C100Y1 • APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS 1/ NOT APPROVED . �i _ DATE: 4,,/// /77) . SIGNATURE 0 DIRECTOR OR HORIZED REPRESENTATIVE • REVIEW COMMENTS TRANSPORTATION-DEVELOPMENT SERVICES PRELLWITZ SHORT PLAT SHPL; V108-90 NE 36th Street and Aberdeen Ave. NE April 11, 1991 • • 1) Private roads are not allowed unless approved by the Hearing Examiner. ` 2) The proposed private road does not align with the city's street grid plan and therefore is not recommended as proposed. • Also the proposed private toad makes an intersection with NE 36th Street which is not allowed per city code which refers to street intersections offsets less than 200 feet shall not be allowed (code no.9- 12-8G14). However, the westerly property line aligns with Monterey Ave. NE street grid plan which would accommodate lots 1 and 4 access and Aberdeen Ave.NE right-of-way would accommodate lots 2 and 3 access. 3) Street improvements required to all approved roadways abutting proposed plat is a follows: • a) Curb, gutters and sidewalks per city standards. b) Street lighting. c) Appropriate street signing. d) Roadway paving. e) Provisions for roadway storm drainage. 4) Appropriate roadway plans for all of the above is required. 5) All approved roadways and utilities to be installed before final plat is to be signed by the authorized approving authorities. 910EM054 Rev,e�e.d ��+ rrr'nr^'-hrrON D DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKSAPR 0 2 1991 DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET BUILDING DIVISION p�►N!I yG ECF- APPLICATION NO(S).: SHPL;V-108-90 onVOPRDMSNN PROPONENT: Douglas Prellwltz APR 0 3 1991 PROJECT TITLE: Prellwitz Short Plat nt(;tilio BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks to short plat a 1.5 acre parcel Into four lots. LOCATION: SEC:32 TWNSHP:24N RNG:5E NW Corner of NE 36th St&Aberdeen Ave NE TO: PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION SCHEDULED TAC DATE: 4/26/91 ' ENGINEERING SECTION TRAFFIC ENG. SECTION UTILITIES ENG. SECTION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION CONSTRUCTION FIELD SERVICES DEVELOPMENT PLANNING PLANNING &TECHNICAL SERVICES PARKS AND RECREATION DIVISION OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5:00 P.M. ON APRIL 12, 1991. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: Cb-V\S -A1C5T), IL'GS APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED FA95-MOMS yis7 AcA-(,e co47 iee,---1,5-,z3-4a61,04?-ro--e_, re60-/A-- DATE: SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV.5/90 devmht i! DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION CONSTRUCTION FIELD SERVICES DEVELOPMENT PLANNING PLANNING &TECHNICAL SERVICES PARKS AND RECREATION DIVISION OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD OUP.M BN .PROVIDED RVI ED2, 1 WRITING. PEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5:00 EVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: AACI(..„S av-NA AReorcailan PPROVED >PPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED &"3 ,4-4--1"-zrt) /4-71-1-417 arY / )7Z6, DATE: 44-9 ( SIGNATU F DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV.5/90 devrvshl REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: • 11re- Freveninar) APPROVED IPPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED "- --%/44449/e-f---04-471- „AL_X-Pg-t=" /Q„/,,x, • _ .� DATE: '�. -/ IGNATUR 'IREC •R OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE 1 REV.5/90 devrni r .)(DEVELOPMENT SERVIc i DIVISION CONSTRUCTION FIELD SERVICES DEVELOPMENT PLANNING PLANNING&TECHNICAL SERVICES PARKS AND RECREATION DIVISION OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5:00 P.M.ON APRIL 12, 1991. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS >NOT APPROVED 1\107 rN ti/ogzr4TdkiCi47. 2. 5/TE tv(7,'fN Gypsy c JD//4.u/Y( &E 64-s/ ' 3, city. Fte .zz /s No-r 1/4/e413 ro s / , b/5Ti'/cr /o7 comovfa,1,N5/UE 11I4 N wo s i9N (w e ,n:'fr a'c (Nl4 , /if olilo .Eb /MT 4c5fl7 '/) efc,CNG r(a /oc,4cE, (F T '/y 5 at05-A is // r z.6-�, /t/4'4 lao /64.rz. -To coaGft oor A 551 V(c /4G145 ifi 7- �u/fir top 'O7 4WD /'&1 /6N To COA//'&c7 7a 7711� L/4y44,, 6rnirw/'5— pVQ 17 6 Peat D15/00 ,1 5ys7M-fig /MM c/iy CoP6"-- 8- c- 3 (ti/cz. Tr caW /o�'/?�D, V' My5Wz 1 5 13 ") �9L WC- �4135 2 N /I N �h'D Alm' 36�7 5147 , PG4 a r r`;4 NM c evIi,L `3� E Qv//Y50, 5, tv �h�lN6- AND /O f 1 ' �/ Cori/roc4 , /�yr_ Fob?/Q /� I�/' !' '° 7/411- lil' DATE: SIGNATURE !f p •EC OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE //_ / 6, 50044/T .2„X3 9 // q �� DA141(tyGs/ s� a6V.5, /90 devrvfhl . ". REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: S bP lrte-r APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS 1NOT APPROVED /. T N l'ylo sy C R Nrvo-&- biRA/AtA-Gr- Cc)NvEYr1-14cE 0/Y /4FCo' D r5 4)/ 7`Ctc 1C'NIV/IYG 4Lo 1G F ST s()a op it a TL► 3t 5c•efil fr peAilyr rf Pceithi AND pas/c.N .b10//yA-G- &c/C/ 77Es IN c coye P4 CF &&(h9 /TIO &I A(G cc,e-,/Y ry gbIR cE t 7?J �-, Tic-fiTc_(NE Aoof 51-)Gir9-Okt s 5 , 5 r xr 5 TZ'/'SCG A-ND Mol°pc cv\irotix 1-// / S olv / -r. sew i'«D(t/c o 7P0 /i+r Ili: reAll 22 51-3 y't / 'r=20/ 5 c4L� r DATE: t P 1 -c NATUR RECTO AUTHORIZED REPRES NTATIVE REV.5/90 devrvahl XDEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION CONSTRUCTION FIELD SERVICES DEVELOPMENT PLANNING PLANNING &TECHNICAL SERVICES • • PARKS AND RECREATION DIVISION • OTHERS: . d:PMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5:00 P.M. ON APRIL 12, 1991. II! 1 . IlEVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: u t-le5 1 N R V/RW APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS X NOT APPROVED 4., i-OGAT b ►1•1 AM �0Ne � , tfaNNFY04-LE p6Qr-"-iot 2-0Na.( 3910 9 4 . 2. Ex, r1fYG- /� 1 Gv/+T ZNl4//y r9-2-oNG A6MD,I 4', A,t1m, 3, .x T ND l/r Wi4T G//Y T F/f 044 /9/36/4D5d-iy /9!'/: )/F u_, ' • A/NG NE 6'711 r/ /p7 Tb M '7 ,A of ry i/Y�: 9-. y6(ot Loc,itT(oN o p Ex/yTT/vt; f=i/TE I/ya /3 4tc �E2S/ �Y MU7� 155 I7`7`/N 3dv Qeef of Fi/ti h/�/ 4y7,NFQ c ivzFJ. W ', i i to al -14 5 «50 - /3E Goc'1'5D //Y C/P'y. Rtc-47 0.1 - k,4y OK w /N Fife, f tS N IS' AND /0 7 /N /O. v aiy7 6, cv41 k twfiRdUfi.�9FNr�S 5N4 L 13E ON 2Z535/ " /4G'TN 54e4 Ts, pr D/ci11 b 7O 0)4T R oNcyo y cF : / "- o ; &I/Ira/a(6//y, /6Q6F/C- 5 �it'i/LC r✓li l�F c U J/� rAgAcr P . v : Gc ptil /yr f/5 65) /94,11 .4774C --mob /--±-,5:4-- X't-0 ; //PP/4f_0.0/ ,r DATE: SIGNATURE !' %RE •: %R AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV.5/90 ` • devrvshl ." .n•.. ._ . .. jl•; • REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: Urtly-PO-Vsar- 190. IA APPROVED X APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS qlOT APPROVED /b 1�C� e.CI�CS ,rvl u Ot�( b�.- . x�evNo .-� 14- le • sak-4-I\ cry ! Osee c 1 :i '�VQ.• S os W - k; Core inee a u-al emxi i\r r - ro , ConsI C +0 ffr�evtsL e - 1" i S-cr� - , . ghoul. \oe CLCA ' Ca t I r rdeAcconneykL3ger'. , 0�, a. u e� � o(� �b �� 0\ e- a.c C-SS '! GO. .\94evVt, WCit, --‘S &Pei F0 C-CLaara- an,ot servict„ ,s,,L,-,:83 . .. D- - \ S / . (d . . L., ,. iJo• 4A '( DATE: Pei /f& /CI ) SIGNATURE / . OF DIRE T*R OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE • • REV.5/90 devrveht - • DEVELOPMENT SERF .i DIVISION CONSTRUCTION FIELD SERVICES DEVELOPMENT PLANNING , PLANNING&TECHNICAL SERVICES PARKS AND RECREATION DIVISION OTHERS: COMMENTS'OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION VSION BY 5 0o P.M. ON PROVIDED 12,ED j WRITING. 1 ITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION:' . APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS ____NOT APPROVED @ I La_ e eLtA- -1-"' 9-15" 2fi-75 6- -IziLel-a-CIS2-°- i V-41-y!.-k-e-A-AL^ ) •--6 ('-1, L3 `i. —�- , J‘) La)—,6-S1- ,c9 9 -af:-Ne—"P'<- 6J -(y ) _ , / 10--Cs4--e-) ----U\A-9-- rli\A":11_6: tra-4--t-)-2-6 6-) .)2-49)\-9")_. /,,, ,r w..j5,._ ej j\s_ 0_,,_kt_R,.,-,41,0 . u‘, . A i„A,cs !__________Lii, SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORI ED REPRESENTATIVE ot___LA__Acvs....„ Q REV.5/90 devr aht REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: r6itc.c... APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED DATE: 64024, i . , SIGNATURE OF DIR OR OR HORIZED REPRESENTATIVE , ',q.''a , ` ' f' REV.5/90 k.„f;,� •.. , devrvant ;i; . E 1 ' DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS - DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET is `ECF- APPLICATION NO(S).: SHPL;V-108-90 !PROPONENT: Douglas Prellwitz PROJECT TITLE: Prellwitz Short Plat BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks to short plat a 1.5 acre parcel Into four lots. LOCATION: SEC:32 TWNSHP: 24N RNG:5E NW Corner of NE 36th St&Aberdeen Ave NE TO: PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION SCHEDULED TAC DATE: 4/26/91 ENGINEERING SECTION TRAFFIC ENG. SECTION UTILITIES ENG. SECTION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION CONSTRUCTION FIELD SERVICES ,I . DEVELOPMENT PLANNING PLANNING &TECHNICAL SERVICES • PARKS AND RECREATION DIVISION • OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5:00 P.M. ON APRIL 12, 1991. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: Pi ' APPROVED V APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED / ' #i'y 97— DATE: SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPR TATIVE REV.5/90 1. PROPERTY MANAGEMENT FEE REVIEW rii DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET 0 PLA??REVIEW ROUTING SLIP - I ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET CI OTHER ' 4PA / • APPLICANT: I , - /IP ' . JOB ADDRESS: • 'r3.4 a/irli1' Z'i"•-� ��i •i NATURE OF WORK: Ai.a !9 aVA7) gIPAI LA �I1f41. _� DATE RECEIVED BY RECEIVED FROM COMMENTS DUE WO# 'v,g�o�' PROPER Moil'.17/P /27354- ---- jL GREEN 4 P o irl°Y Q" FEES APPLIED CI NEED MORE INFORMATION 0 LEGAL DESCRIPTIONP'9 \ 0 NOT APPROVED FOR 0 FRONT FOOTAGE 0 SQUARE FOOTAGE p .4J APPLICATION OF FEES • 0 'VICINITY MAP El OTHER, it is the intent of this development fee analysis to put the developer/oWner on notice,that the fees quoted below will apply to the subject site upon development Of the property. All quoted fees are due and payable at the time the construction permit is issued to install the on-site and off-site improvements(i.e.underground utilitief,street improvements,etc.) V PROJECT COST LATECOMER PRIVATE DEVELOPER HELD FEE LATECOMER AGREEMENT NO. PER. FIG. WATER SEWER _ A OTHER -- SAD SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICTFTG FEE WATER SEWER OTHER _ #',3 SUCC FEE SPECIAL UTILITY CONNECTION CHARGE-WATER UNITS , SW CE Single family residential dwelling unit$940/lot x / Apartment, Condo,each multiplex unit$545/ea.unit x / . . Commercial/Industrial$.126/sq.ft.of property x (not less than $940.00) SPECIAL UTILITY CONNECTION CHARGE-SEWER - UNITS SUCC FEE Single family residential dwelling unit$470/lot x / Apartment,Condo,each multiplex unit$270/ea.unit x Commercial/Industrial$.063/sq.ft.of property x (not less than$470.00) _ - - - . 1TOTAL: I $ ca The above quoted fees do NOT include Inspection fees,side sewer permits,r/Va permit fees or the cost of water meters. x '-' 410.1,a.L . u,a(1 z 1,,,t_ -a? ti.4•=A-e--- • 5. . 4 /2112.-t-t h-i . --)A71,4.t. 0//1/ ?"'. Signature of Director or Authorized Representative DATE wit. ..,v/i.,..I,...P/t»H/►r e • . '1 . PRELLWITZ SHORT PLAT APPROVAI S __ _ SW q74 NE 1/4 OF EXAMINED AND APPROVED THIS DAY OF l991- ----- -- SECTION 32, TOWNSHIP 24 NORTH, HEARING EXAMINER RANGE 5 EAST, W.M. EXAMINED AND APPROVED THIS DAY OF 1991 = CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON 1„-40, ADMINISTRATION, PLANNING, BUILDING AND PUBLIC WORKS • EXAMINED AND APPROVED THIS DAY OF 1991 • GRAPHIC SCALE DEVELOPMENT SERVICE MANAGER 44 NMm +w EXAMINED AND APPROVED THIS DAY OF 1991 IN FEET J TRANSPORTAOON SYSTEM MANAGER 1 inch= 40 tL EXAMINED AND APPROVED THIS DAY OF 1991 BASIS OF BEARING= KCAS DATUM • KING COUNTY ASSESSOR DEPUTY I LEGAL DESCRIP770N LOT 9, BLOCK 4, HILLMAN'S C.O. LAKE WASHINGTON GARDEN DIV. NO. 7, ACCORDING TO PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN VOL 16 OF ‘.- N� PLATS PACE 18, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGON. N 88 09 29"W 298.57' ', 1 147.25 151.25' ---71 PRIVATE ROAD LEGAL DESCRIPTION I COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 9. BLOCK 4 OF HILLMAN'S C.D. W JO' � • LAKE WASHINGTON GARDEN OF EDEN, DIV, ND. 71 THENCE S 88'51'22'E 132.26 n FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE N 0139'54"E 105.26 a N I �1 FEET TO A POINT OF TANGENCY THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT WITH A RADDUS OF 15 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF en j I �p LOT 4 !�o LOT 3 907020"AND AN ARC LENGTH OF 23.67 FEET,; THENCE N 883026"W o N 111 4.95 FEET• THENCE N 0139'54"E 20.00 FEET; THENCE-5 883026"E 2 O1 m 70.00 FEET; THENCE S 0139'54" W 20.00 FEET; THENCE N 883026"W ill N W ^ 5.05 FEET TO A POINT OF TANGENCY, THENCE ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT I h n. N 'W WITH A RADIUS OF 15 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 89'49'40" I AND AN ARC LENGTH OF 23.52 FEET;; THENCE S 0739'54"W 105.16 FEET; n- 35.00' 35.00' h Z THENCE N 8851'22' W 30 FEET TO THE TRUE OF BEGINNING. N p N 88:10'26"W o j 11225' 2Nr4.95' S.OS'T N2 \ 116.J4' 117.21 N 8830'26"W Q. CER77F7CAIF N BB3026"W 121.39' 'W my1 Q I =907020" _ 15.00' " i. W I i(WE)HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I AM(WE ARE) THE OWNER(S)IN FEE SIMPLE U R= 15.00' o�N, CC m R= 14 96, o O OF THE LAND HEREBY PLATTED IN THIS SHORT PLAT. 7= 15.05' io 1 0^ L =23.61' ,,.''5 = Oo L = 23.52' h2 I J 2 LOT 1 I OWNER OWNER 15.9u w n. W W Li 1.., LOT 2 °J • a h ti LT Q • AKNOWI EDCEMENT v7 rn Q h A= 8931'79" 30' • I n h ,n R= 25,00' I STATE OF WASHINGTON ) 2 r L = 39.06' COUNTY OF KING ) ss SW CORNER 2 2 INS IS TO(FRTIFY 7NA1 ON nH15 DAr of SAD. - OF LOT 9, 8LK 4 799_,BEFORE MC THE UNDERSIGNED,A NOTARY PUBLIC, 13226' JO 00' 111.64' PERSONALLY APPEARED I N 885122" W 273.90' I TO ME KNOWN TO BE THE INDIVIDUAL(S)WHO SIGNED THE ABOVE CERTIFICATE AND ACKNOWLEDGED 30' 30' 30' TO ME THAT THEY SIGNED THE SAME AS THEIR FREE VOLUNTARY ACT AND 1 DEED. M7NESS MY HAND AND OFTIOAL SEAL THE DAY AND YEAR FIRST //��---- 655.17' N 8851'22"W ; 1310.22' ABOVE WRITTEN. ' 147.26' �"-. — 181.]9' — — _�� — — NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR THE 30' STATE OF WASHINGTON,RESIDING NE 36TH STREET 30' EAST 1/4 CORNER OF AT RENTOV SECTION 32-24-5 ' \ 15 TOUMA ENGINEERS l . HwyVolley (206)255-4100 ' SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE ���aE`W SOy� � RECORDING CERTIFlCA7E THIS MAP CORRECTLY REPRESENTS A SURVEY ��'+•'' y.,i YI FILED FOR RECORD THIS DAY OF . 199 Drown by TO Checked by KO MADE BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTION IN j i V CONFORMANCE WITH THE SURVEY RECORDING ACT % ��'�'�-•)) 04 AT IN BOOK OF SURVEYS ON AT THE REQUEST OF DOUGLAS PRECLWI7Z %'=H 5524 �� Job No. 639-001-901 Drowing No. 6390ISPL • I=J PAGE AT THE REQUEST OF KENNETN J. OYLER IN MARCH 14, 1991. • 1 A4 t� 5, ���771 l)14,, GISTf0. of 3/50/f/ 11 •4'.Zel----= Dote MARCH 7, 1991.• Sheet I OF 1 . RT/FICATF NUMBER 5524 - DATE `t��"� MANAGER SUPERINTENDENT OF RECORDS • t$ CIT OF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works Department Earl Clymer, Mayor Lynn Guttmann,Administrator August 27, 1991 • Mr.Tom Touma Touma Engineers 15668 W Valley Hwy Seattle,WA 98188 SUBJECT: Prellwitz Short Plat SHPL;V-108-90 Dear Mr.Touma: The date of Tuesday, September 10, 1991, at 9:00 a.m., has been set for a short plat and variance public hearing to review the above-referenced matter. The hearing,.before Mr. Fred Kaufman, Renton Hearing Examiner,will be held in the Council Chambers on the second_floor of City Hall, Renton,Washington. The applicant or representative(s) of the applicant is required to be present at the public hearing. A copy of the staff report will be mailed to you one week before the hearing. If you prefer to make other arrangements to receive the staff report, please contact Kathleen Childers,277-5582, or Sandi Seeger, 277- 5581. If you have any questions, please call 235-2550. Sin erely, V Dona d K. Erickson,AICP Zoning Administrator • cc: Douglas Prellwitz 2609 NE 6th PI Renton,WA 98056 ( Ken Taylor 3711 Monterey PI NE Renton,WA 98056 Maxine Trus 3792 Lincoln Ave NE Renton,WA 98056 • hexHr/DKE/kae 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING. RENTON HEARING EXAMINER RENTON,WASHINGTON. A Public Hearing will be held by the Renton Hearing Examiner at his regular meeting:in the Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall, Renton, Washington, on September 10, 1991 at 9:00 a.m. to consider the following petitions:. PRELLWITZ SHORT PLAT' SHPL;V-108-90 The applicant seeks to subdivide,1.5'acres into four lots for the future construction of single-family homes. The applicant also seeks approval of a variance to provide access to the lots by a. private road. The.project is located on the northwest corner of the intersection of NE 36th Street and the extension of Aberdeen Ave.NE. Legal descriptions of the files noted above are on file in the Development Services Division, Third Floor, Municipal Building, Renton. All interested persons to said petitions are invited'to be present at the Public Hearing on September 10, 1991 at 9:00 a.m.to express their opinions. Publication Date: August 29, 1.991 Account No.51067 hexpub OF r` RED 1' o O kit 4r' ;i u.a�cn ti rrt2_ 3 �4'''..?1M' 5, VV. • Z � 1 =i• t, q 31.t'®q . i^, t; }I , (i § • it '4 y, 8: v r Sv .. p9q e av`.,',I F'Jy'r,$fi .;z ('z t:-G;,., •1 pJi "` t' .. n, •; 0,94 • • 4'p SEP1EM•0�P C • City of Renton Land Use Hearing Examiner - will hold a .•• 15Sh i t f ' Ivet t {-` sy r tI < rA ^ JtC lilt zr.,. ) 1 r • . in • • CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS. CITY HALL ON SEPTEMBER 10, 1991 BEGINNING AT 9:00 A.M. P.M. CONCE 'NING.• • PRELLWITZ SHORT PLAT • . • SHPL;V-108-90 • •• APPLICANT SEEKS TO SHORT PLAT A 1.5 ACRE PARCEL INTO FOUR , • LOTS, GRAPHIC SCAIE ', • • �•, Lt T'.r.l .. i • I • , rl.�.�ii)a . . BASISMIME MIME-1 MIN NY' • , I I ' N paV5'2r N lee}i' N �' lE' > I I tm ?I!2 I to f 2 cr cg ear al K R W Iabz N�4re 40 w' 2 Ir/.rr IA MAN'N eef' 1 ' Q a I . 31 ‘10• .W' bjt r ) iv b: Imlt- e gcrg -r 1 . . W I I �'Q T N-IS O1111'b�br-r1 OW • SIW lL.PO ere • b' lo' — T- - • c -—• I '� _Irrarlv_ -1aiaNeem-7r : ___ mlm: i NE 367T1,STREET •0 ..=•p 11c-mlN 1-=40' GENERAL LOCATION AND/OR ADDRESS: NW CORNER OF'NE 36TH ST&ABERDEEN AVE NE . Zr j FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CALL THE CITY OF FiENTON . PLANNING ®I'VISION 235-2550 THIS NOTICE Not TO BE REI!llOViE® ;WITH0 1 HbtPSTR PROPER AUTHORIZATION. . . - CERTIFICATION I , ' , HEREBY CERTIFY THAT - • COPIES OF THE ABOVE OCUMENT WERE POSTED BY ME IN 3 CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON OR. .NEARBY THE DESCRIBED PROPERTY ON al 2) I91 e �oQ9.6G®ff?&ff®p�e,� o,� • s®�gkET J A ♦o♦ � • „o QQ;�061°N °•G� T:gsT: Subsc bed and sworn to before me, a r �;d- -v.:. Ay Public, in and for the State of uashingpn • :v NOTARY n°resi i in , on the SIGNED :. „Lk ,r ry(M4I 3 N. PUBLIC aY Qf r — J t� 9.1%. • ,i•7 ' > t >1fi •v..`, 4.iti w Y yitil:L1 "`e 4.' I r t-1 t'• +, i 1f1••,:_ 1i T 7. vA+lys'y rLyf� }t! ,aT , y ti s, fn.; dt i • nay!' • 7 a1 �.. .. f} J• ( �� y, y 71 Y, Li. 1 30 �. 4. • 1 '' G. it 4-+:ram{; + i ?y�• y 1 •ii i • ;. 11 r.y i. + .i r,. `+ O. 6 ,1 t Y :,,"`J.k R S'-. P 1 0,9, �P 1TFo SEPZEMO . City of Renton Land Use Hearing Examiner • will hold a {A,.. , frx; •t` < 'v i'' 4, i x - ,. •n . '•t r. c r r � ' 4 F y .r+ } plc`] ;j,fu L 4 h i,'. • r v t I 'n • r ' • t Lt,. „ T �.fi.x h;M 'ri a j,vM1"1 .• ' : ,. A r 1 i", .t rSl 4 . . • k • �xkr 1 i.t '• a w,%3' s } '..• .,. I f'1' t as r t sl 3 r"i" r r f •. r + IL Y a5'; .. % { h •' 1 t >• AP • fLk t + 14 h • t•.. + 7 .., M. .. 1 � 9 • •ir ,'Y.i: -11 f't7,1 ,J IS 3 •s '' .' /L` 7 •, +4 �1'y,.' }�" rst vs xi; v s a ,I el.il- 11 •i .. . +'*"^' « ?3? 'l fit'+1i ,a`'` , 54, ,'' ,,' .4.. ', r ....r in CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS , CITY HALL ON SEPTEMBER 10, 1991 BEGINNING AT 9:00 A.M. P.M• PRELLINITZ SHORT PLAT SHPL;V-108-90 , . APPLICANT SEEKS. TO SHORT PLAT A 1 .5 ACRE PARCEL INTO I=OUR LOTS GRAPHIC SCALE • (01 rOOT) I Ineh.40 n. BASIS OF DEARING.KCAS DATUM I 1 1 N N�d09'29•W 296.31' 1 M7.73 131.13' ---JI I 'I W J6' • I LOT 4 a 9 2 Cs II; LOT iu I � ry ,x �' W is �ti tki I :38 N errO'76"W $o 11225 xtr4.93' 3.03• gk 117.21 N 883016'WW 116.J4' Q• I N ee70'16•W 111.39• W 41 • w la � 1 • 8 I. 'A R.moo'70• R O n=eJ9�Io n n r.Is.o3 Q Q e rc9e' o W —II I LOT l L-7J.61' v� '� [•7J.37• g L I , Li . N In.ti e..0' W lu Lu w LOT o • a m I 1 • j.{ w Q,.{ 1" C.e9 JI'19' Q 1 I n h ]h R.13. ' S �� T.7�.79 I SW CORNER c OF(Of 9.DLK IR176' 2 J2y0 2 tll R1'L 39.06' I 1 N 6e3171"W 77.190' 1 JO' J0' JO' I 655.11' N 683171•W � IJ10.22' • �/�s 117.16 Vic—— — 16- 11.1A JO' NE 36TN. STREET J0. EAsr 1/4 CORNER of SECBOR J7-24-3 ' I \ 1"=40' i • GENERAL AL LOCATION AND/OR ADDRESS: NW CORNEA OP NE 36TH ST & AI3ERDEEN AVE NE FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CALL THE CITY OF RENTON PLANNING DIVISION 235-2550 TH!B NOTICE NOT TO BE REMOVED WITHOUT HEXPSTR w'-MT — OPE‘.'i e ' UT .-•fix O k 1 '.P+ ATION • ..::5::+::: ::o-i:ea:;>:.>;:::::'»:»:;: i:::::: ::::;>::;:::isi::i2:: :i::::f:::::::i:::::::{:i::::isi::ri:>:::::::i:is::;::::**::::::ii'•::i::::: :i: ::ist::?f:i`::'*::.:.0:: ::: : :�:::: i.`•i:i%;iii.... tr,:.;:.::•:� .:5::]....:::>'::::::DEPARTMENT.:O1 PLAN G <:B.UILDI.. G/PU.BLIG;WOR.KS: .Y..0 : :•:•;::::;0 : :: : :::::::::::::::< ::>::>:<: ::>::>:::::::::: <: :: ::>:::;::TtG : N�GAL�AD'VISRY;+CO.IVOfV O911I'T . . E ....:..:.:..:: :::: .:: . ::::: .:::: :.•: ..k .,..:.::'•:':'::::•:::':•:::• :: ' ::::::•:: ::: . ::STA{F=F:I1 EQ t:•::::•:::::::::::::::::::::::.:•:::::::::::•:.;:•.:;.>;.•.:;:::.'::.•::.•:::::.:•:...• Y. Y" j'*;$::'r:v:•, :�:::'(:::i: :>:{Y::i} :::::::i;:::}:::i {::v: :iS''::.;{.'•:::::.{ : : .1."'.:':':.:isji::':i:::i`::ti�:ti:ii:::ititi:: :.r>::::v::::4i::::::::�:i::::? :Si:f:{:ii:i<?:::Li i::.: ul,s•• � r it rts:', ,1.Y, Y #,'"c•rt,,,t,. f+„•,..k fi!`.s.tor.eitl e),s„ +',4.q.,FA M:,e.At%w li.:.".:."?f•,r.t.y w.%-tai t,,,1 .+.4yx!a4' 1 4+ :s.a,,zvtT 4P..lr;.7';•. ,.Su'fc�„.-: J,1• .04 X..'•1 6',W,i.d:th,j0..,.0, • N D::>:: :.>::<:>:::;:::::::::::::: >>;:<::::<::::>;:::::::::::::�: : :: :: : :::: :: >:: :::::::<;: : :: ::::: : >:: :::;:: ::><: ;r .lw'tz �:t: :':::::: ' :2:'Y:> � :::":f'''::ti::::r :::;:;:>::::>:::::>::' ........................f�ou':.i..'.:� [ref .............. ............ .... . :rt; at : ? :: `r.:'::: ::>:: : : :�: > <: : : :`i��:::>::::::::>:: . 4 �::�:: :>::>:::::> :::::•;:::::>:::: ::::>:::;:;<:::�<:::>::::>::;��• .reliwtz:. h� rt a .... ..... .... . . >::�:;::ti:::::: E N.vI:Vi.>Is Rots] ::: ::•.N:.:.:M: rNTAL:ti CF� ECK:. Cl5::.T::>. <.:::.v::..:.:::.1H.v:. p.:.::.1 _...�:.✓:.:•:.:::.:...s:...:... :a:•:.. .:i..:.•. ... ..�..'.:.�.::.•l•:'� '.' •?;•y} }} ; . '�•:;::j•: ;?I:'1S II`':'!::'i?. :i �Lii: :•.i:;;:?h •....•::..•.:'.:i: '.•:;;• :::�: .:v.::• ••... ::.�..:...... ..... ..... •::".'::l.l::'.:l .1•f.'.• :1�. ::1:: .'::.•:..•:..:.. ...... .:.:;.. • ..::•.:..•.�..... : .,.....:::::.:.:::::::•::: ::v:::.�::::::: v:: : : .i i } :. : ^::.:::':.^ : :•:. :.•::::. ; .:::.: ..: :. i. b>.:•.i.:{ • iYi :•. :•..:•.4 ; :: ESCRIP 10 :.OF•P QPOSAL : • The:a .Ucntsa ks::to:subdi !d : :5.afires;:.into'fqur: s : :r... • , . ...: :. : .:. : a•;, •:':•::•..>;:•: <::: ::: < >: <:: >:; : :::: :>:: ::::::::::::•::•::.::., for•ahe.;futura:::cohirubtidh;:of:stngt0-amily �om s,.>::Th : . . •: . . .. . . : . . . . . .... :.:. ... ... , . : e : • :: : ::>.::.::; .::::: ::>.::::.:•�: :: :>:.: :>;.;.>:.: .::: <:.:;:::>;:.:.::::>::: :....: :.:...:aIlea t.als0•:.saef< :. r ov i:: f ava. r .:.to..pray.ide..: : :: . v::to r:: d:: :�::>::> :.:::i::.: '::':::::::;. :::::.•:::::. : :::::::: ::::::: :.;': :•.<• .:•'•. : ...'... .: . . . .. .accass:.tq:th,e;lots.bya•.p•: ..:.e:oa. :: :..•;':';• '•; ::• •::• .. corner .......................... ......... .......... .......... ......... ......... . . :.;;:.:•:•:•;•:•> tJC Ti N::C� P> OPO.SA::: : ::ai':>::::.: The ro ecta�te:fs:(ocated;:vn,t e.: o.. . est<: Q;.;:.:•.•:•.<•::•: :: =::::::::«:i: :: :::::<:::<: <::<::::>:::: < :::::>;::::. ::: :;> :« >: :::> e...•...ter. ..... •.....:.., . . i f.•:? :.'.:;.;:::::.::.:::•:::.::.:::•::. :':.:::.:.:.:.::.::: ::::.::.:::.::.:: :::.:::.:: .:.:::•>:•::•: >:that:Intersectiv....::of.::NE::3sth SireeX:;:and;:the;ex ns on:..o::: ed A e. 1i1 ,---9--1 j ..an U IO ,aI 9 F., F A Pot ins Jn. 60 7.,...) 2 C ° 1, .,. toll! ' PI- .",tN COR ORATE I /./O S.E. Nur 84TH°P"N STa tl1./tD/)) °1=0 to °* 1-O-f—'3 ® •@- -°=°.... J, t,r n )ai.)1 , Federal S.61.Ins Corp Lir , r) • GAR o ,D E ;\ ® ,-'y E ii E 1, • -, $ ACW.D.Jones U;. 21 Z[4 4 a 3 ,,� �\u) •' 1 c 2 I , R Ooold E. John0on 1,9Ur.1 9, ,,___. --ire"' A !� rT• ' . +/r r; ^ SS101 lJ FUI rf..vr _ _E)G_.........-_ xp • DIVISION N O7 °�= 1 $ Carl T. 01 son , 2a !er ® ut s W Eo- rv) x 3 N wry____ 5 tors= > l22 Cn SI t.4IIAc. no6ert Nissen t!.!1 �S.R 50603t9a I! 4,... . Ia • C = 04 : Y !1 a Edmund J. Neuman 8 0 7 9 0 I----6---.A---5--- - — if .0 )r — - _i • , Do Ito , c� • • e�°,�-u)):ok{ _ — --;-Fn- S,E.Nor 86THo.eN S�. `° t ! t/r r 9. - " AQ t)1 y �, tlr.�l "sti4 , , �' 311� Z° 4,. Iih .' Q r.. d+ 1111 Qv i I tll'1" 0, 7 8 .r Cli �1l, 0 _ .1a31' YY is Q ,. I t .4 1 a s+� U o —In _._...s_J" te �10 a' 9 G1oI \�� g4 s ... •5. `I Z 2r4 I al 1!o ' -J 4 6 0 5 J19 1 BSI,. \\ - 1*4At y1p 3 - �itar e s.Qas,P-e�!�-t.➢^.k'�„•.r cn4;,._..ss!' ,1 _J 10 ;1 if.N I91..! ii N E. 36TH ST •.- �� Na r'-'T�' 111 _ Nor OPEN —R, g t10 lad: ° IJ �__ 69 t�I . .z .-rqo -- �. - 70 -3 71 x •9A• - v. 68 �?a � \ u L z' 1 • W I 1 365 ,� • 73, 72 R g ‘`;;. • 66 `w ' . I •,. w 1��„r. C.' D..' H I LLMAN 'S C, . p� lel l J • F I/ = 74 75 "a „ I • o . 1 : AI N.E. N 1 `•f�' .-- •. •• . — !... • .+ r . 1 \I i- r,. f t a° i 1 0. A I.0 C' I prelta° • Technical Advisory Committee Staff Report Prellwitz Shortplat • • August 13, 1991 Page 2 • iiSSU.ES LAND USE 1. Whether the proposed project is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Element designation and with Goals, Policies and Objectives set forth In the Plan? • The proposed development is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan designation of Single I; Family Residential. The Comprehensive Plan defines the Single Family Residential area as an area 11, Intended for detached single family dwelling units --not exceeding a density of six dwelling units per gross acre--and related low density uses. The proposed project provides a density of 2.7 units per gross acre. 2. Whether the proposed project is consistent with the Zoning Map designation and applicable Zoning Ordinance components? The project site is designated R-1, Single Family Residential, on the City of Renton Zoning Map; The proposed development would allow for the future construction of four single family dwelling units. The proposed lot layout allows an adequate area for building pads and setbacks required within the R-1 zone. 3. Whether the proposed project is consistent with the site characteristics. The subject property is fairly level.with slopes less than 15 percent. The property is vegetated with a variety of trees. The applicant will be required to provide a tree retention plan in order to maintain the character of the site and the surrounding area. 4. Whether the proposed development is compatible with vicinity land uses. The area adjacent to the project site has.been developed as a single-family residential area. The lot sizes within the area range from approximately 10,000 square feet to over a one acre in size': . The proposed development,.lots ranging in size from 15,914 square feet to 17,417 square feet, can be considered compatible with the adjacent land uses. 5. Whether the proposed development is consistent with the Renton Subdivision Ordinance. • The proposed development is consistent with Renton Subdivision Code provisions, including standards for lot sizes, dimension, and configuration. The Code requires a minimum lot size of 7,200 square feet. The minimum lot size provided by this development would be 15,914 square ' feet. The corner lots have been platted to be wider than the interior lots. The applicant has _ proposed to provide access to the lots created by this shortplat by a private road. In accordance with the subdivision ordinance,the applicant has submitted a variance request for the private road. The applicant is proposing to provide access to the four lots via a private road. in accordance with Section 9-12-8.X.1.h. the applicant has submitted a variance application requesting approval of the private street. The Transportation Systems Division has noted that the location of the private street does not provide the required off-set from the adjacent public street intersection (see City Code Section 9-12-8.G.14) and that the proposed street does not comply with the adopted grid location for streets in this area. The Transportation Systems Division has recommended that the applicant improve Aberdeen Ave.and provide a private cul-de-sac off of Aberdeen Ave. This would allow for Aberdeen Ave.to be continued to the south as other projects in the area are proposed. The applicant is proposing to develop the lots on septic systems due to the lack of a City sanitary sewer system in the area. The applicant has investigated the possibility of connecting with the County sanitary sewer;line. It appears that. at this time it is not economically feasible for the applicant to connect with either County or City of Renton sanitary sewer systems. s. Whether there are sufficient municipal services to serve the site? Police and Fire Prevention Bureau staff report adequate resources to provide services to the project site during construction and after development with system improvement fees and Code- required improvements. This development would only have minor impact on the existing water system. The applicant would have to extend water lines onto the project site. There are no sanitary sewer lines in the vicinity of this project. The applicant proposes to use septic systems. The City can require a ' • fi - • prellac Technical Advisory Committee Staff Report Prellwitz Shortplat August 13, 1991 Page 3 person using a septic system to connect to a sanitary sewer system when the sanitary sewer system is extended to within 200 feet of the property. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Whether the applicant has adequately identified and addressed the following environmental impacts likely to occur in conjunction with the proposed development. a. Land Use Impact: The applicant is proposing to subdivide an existing 1.5 acre parcel into four lots ranging in size from 15,914 square feet (0.36 acres) to 17,417 square feet (0.39 acres). This will allow for the construction of four single family homes at a later date. This lot is part of the area that was annexed Into the City of Renton last year. At that time, the area was designated for single family residential development and zoned R-1. The proposed short plat is consistent with the existing area development which consists of single-family homes. In accordance with Sepa (WAC 197-11-800) a short plat is considered to be categorically exempt from SEPA. A review of the project has not identified any issue that would require an environmental review. Mitigation Measures: None Required. • Policy Nexus: N/A b. Natural Environment Impact: The project site is heavily wooded and generally slopes gently to the north. Staff is concerned that as many of the significant trees as possible be retained on-site in order to maintain the character of the area and to ensure the stability of the soil. Staff will require a tree retention plan and a Routine Vegetation Management Permit prior to any site preparation permits. Mitigation Measures: See Recommendation#2. Policy Nexus: Land Clearing and Tree Cutting Ordinance 4-9 c. Housing Impact: The proposed four lot subdivision will allow for a small increase in the housing stock in northeast Renton, in an area designated for single-family homes on the Comprehensive Plan and on the Zoning Map. Opportunities for single-family housing are becoming Increasingly important within the City as growth management practices are putting greater pressure on developers to construct on infill areas where existing utilities and other public services can easily be extended to the new development. Mitigation Measures: None Required. Policy Nexus: N/A d. Noise, Light and Glare Impact: a) Construction Noise, light and glare are anticipated in conjunction with the grading of the project site and with the construction of the single-family homes. Some mitigation of these impacts will be achieved through the limitation of hauling operations and routes staff will recommend to the Hearing Examiner as part of the construction management plan. b) Operation Staff consider that the subdivision and the introduction of 4 new single-family homes will only result in a modest increase in noise, light, and glare to the • preltec Technical Advisory Committee Staff Report Prellwitz Shortplat . " August 13, 1991 Page 4 surrounding community. These impacts will be reduced to the extent possible by the retention of existing natural vegetation. - Mitigation Measures: None Required. Policy Nexus: N/A e. Traffic Impacts: The planned future development of four single-family homes on this site, a;' facilitated by the proposed subdivision, is anticipated to generate approximately 40 ADWVTE's,which is not expected to result in significant traffic impacts. Staff have,noted,that off-site Code-required transportation improvements will be needed if the plat is approved, including roadway plans, curbs, gutters, sidewalks and street lighting.' The applicant will need to provide half-width road dedication and improvements on the east and south boundary of the project site. The applicant prefers the use of a private road off of NE 36th Street to be used for access • to each of the proposed lots. . This alternative would be less expensive then the construction of a half-width road built to City street standards along the Aberdeen Ave' right-of-way. The private road would connect with Aberdeen Ave. instead of 36th St. as the applicant has proposed. The City Codes require private roads to be off set from existing intersection by a minimum of 200 feet. The private road, as proposed by the applicant, is only 111 feet from the proposed intersection of Aberdeen Ave. and 36th Street. A road easement exists south of 36th Street and a 30 foot easement exist north of 36th Street for Aberdeen Ave. Staff feels strongly that this development should not eliminate the potential for Aberdeen Ave.to be constructed in this area. The adopted grid system for this area indicates a Monterey Ave.will be constructed along the west boundary of the project site. Transportation Systems Division staff have Indicated that the applicant would not be required to provide improvements for this street. Mitigation Measures: See Recommendation #4. Policy Nexus: Six-year Street Plan, Street Arterial Plan, Comprehensive Plan - General Goals, Objectives and Policies, NE Renton Plan f. Public Services/Utilities a) Police and Fire Impacts: Police and Fire Prevention Bureau staff Indicate that sufficient resources' exist to provide service to the proposed development provide that Code-required improvements and fees are provided. Mitigation Measures: None Required. Policy Nexus: N/A b) Recreation Impacts: The applicant has not proposed to provide on-site recreation facilities; • within this plat nor have regional impacts been addressed within this proposal' The applicant will need to review the Parks Comprehensive Plan and the proposed Master Trail Plan with the Parks Section of the Community Services Department staff. In order to mitigate both on-site and regional recreation impacts the applicant may make a voluntary contribution of$600.00 ($150.00 X 4 Lots). Mitigation Measures: See Recommendation#3. Policy Nexus: Parks Comprehensive Plan. c) Schools Impacts: It can be anticipated that the proposed project, once developed forl. single-family homes, will generate approximately 3 school aged children. This, . / 1 prellae Vy' Technical Advisory Committee Staff Report Prellwitz Shortplat • • August 13, 1991 Page 5 number of students Is not expected to have a negative impact on the Renton School System. Mitigation Measures: None Required. Policy Nexus: N/A d) Storm Water Impact: Prior to the Issuance of any site preparation permits the applicant will need to provide a final storm water analysis in accordance with the King County Surface Water Design Manual adopted by the City of Renton. Mitigation Measures: None Required. Policy Nexus: N/A e) Public Utilities • Impacts: Water Utilities staff note that a water line can easily be extended along the frontage of the proposed subdivision by the applicant to provide service to the proposed lots. There are no City sewer lines that can easily be extended to serve . the proposed subdivision. Dry lines would have to be installed with the future • homes served by on-site septic systems until a sanitary sewer line can be •• extended to the area. The applicant will need to provide an agreement to connect to City sanitary sewer lines when they become available. • Mitigation Measures: See Recommendation#1 . Policy Nexus: Comprehensive Sewer Plan • g. Construction Impacts Impacts: No construction impacts are anticipated in conjunction with the platting action. When construction does begin, it is expected that there will be both on-site and off-site construction impacts, including dust, debris, noise, light and glare. Staff will recommend to the Hearing Examiner that a temporary erosion/sedimentation control plan and a construction management plan be required for this development. Mitigation Measures: See Recommendation #5. Policy Nexus: Environmental Review Ordinance 4-6, Comprehensive Plan-General Goals, Objectives and Policies. Staff will recommend to the Hearing Examiner in favor of the proposed short plat, subject to the following conditions: 1. The owner shall provide evidence of King County Health Department approval for the use of septic systems and drainflelds for Lot #1, Lot #2, Lot #3, and Lot #4 prior to the issuance of site preparation permits. , (Note 1.a: Septic systems may be permitted as no connection to sewer lines is feasible at • • this time. In the event that connection to the sewer system does become feasible at a future date, the owner(s), will be called upon to make that connection. An agreement to provide sewer system connections•shall be placed on the face of the plat and recorded with the title report for the subject properties.) 2. The owner shall provide a description of the extent to which existing trees and plants on proposed Lot #1, Lot #2, Lot #3 and Lot #4 will be removed or disturbed by the proposed short plat. This inventory/plan shall be provided to the satisfaction of the Development Planning Section prior to the public hearing for the short subdivision. A note prellec Technical Advisory Committee Staff Report Prellwitz Shortplat . August 13, 1991 Page 6 shall be recorded on face of the plat indicating that existing trees shall be retained in accordance with the approved tree retention plan. 3. The applicant is encouraged to meet with the Community Services Department to discuss tt}js protect' I..npacts on tjge City's recregational facilities and_proposed Master Trails Plan. Vdlu 7'q 1 p.e 40,41'1 SD,do/Go G 4. The applicant shall, in order to address City policy/regulations and mitigate traffic impacts, amend the short plat so that the proposed private road has its access from Aberdeen Ave. NE. 5. The applicant shall, in order to mitigate the adverse impacts of construction, provide a temporary erosion control plan and a construction management plan to the satisfaction of the Department of Planning/Building/Public Works. Note: The applicant shall provide all required Improvements (e.g. utility connections, road improvements) in accordance with the City of Renton Municipal Code. . ....,..:.............................�..............:.............:.:.........................,....................................:. .......... .......::.::::::::::.:,::....................�...................;.,:...;..::::-: i. is :;:::<: ;::�::::>:.V.�rious!Cit ;de' . rfinens.ha.e:re..ie...eland�:carnme...:tel:ups..:........e..P:Pec.C...:...:....$...:p..:m.meh....•:..r..:::. ..................................... ..:.......�.:.............._a�ttaGh�.,..or.... .our..r�....._e...,........................:.:..............::...: .�:;::..:.:.:...: ....�............:.........:.......�....:..:..�....::.........�.�..:...:....�....:.:.�...�......... D • • • • • • preltac - DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF- APPLICATION NO(S).: SHPL;V-108-90 PROPONENT: Douglas Preliwitz PROJECT TITLE: Prellwitz Short Plat BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks to short plat a 1.5 acre parcel Into four lots. LOCATION: SEC:32 TWNSHP: 24N RNG:5E NW Corner of NE 36th St&Aberdeen Ave NE TO: PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION SCHEDULED TAC DATE: 4/26/91 ENGINEERING SECTION TRAFFIC ENG. SECTION UTILITIES ENG. SECTION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION CONSTRUCTION FIELD SERVICES DEVELOPMENT PLANNING PLANNING &TECHNICAL SERVICES PARKS AND RECREATION DIVISION OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5:00 P.M. ON APRIL 12, 1991. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: of IrticaVAZ) APPROVED V APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED re' (1-164A-6)4( DATE: l/ 9/ SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPR TATIVE REV.5/90 • dovrvsht ; PROPERTY FEE REVIEW • e--------dy, ..._ DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET CI PLAN!Imp,ROUTING SLIP •, SHEET..,..„1') ' - " • I ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEWREVIEWSHEET0 • OTHER APPLICANT: C6 .. • cx..„ • .r , / 419111°JOB ADDRESS: . c4-t•. 3 ‘...-fre...4. DATE REEIVED BY RECEIVED FROM COMMENTS DUE WO# . . PROPER.1, MpoiT. .N14.11110 1314.1-rt901C3'; 1-7/ P-' GREEN# 0-• vi•S.1-.. ' SYFEES APPLIED --115i. ,--(: (-- CI NEED MORE INFORMATION 0 LEGAL DESCRIPTIONO CI NOT APPROVED FOR 0 FRONT FOOTAGE El SQUARE FOOTAGE APPLICATION OF FEES 0 VICINITY MAP 0 OTHER .• , , ) It is the intent of this development fee analysis to put the developer/owner on notice,that the fees quoted below will apply to the subject site upon development of the property. All quoted fees are due and payable at the time the construction prOilt I s issued to Install the op-site and off-site Improvements(i.e.underground utilities,street improvements, etc.) 1 • PRIVATE 0,PTI-0PFR HELD PROJECT COST LATECOMER . LATECOMER AGREEMENT NO. PER. FIG. FEE WATE 'I •,........(2 .... • . SEWER! • ......p --. , OTHER ' — --- - ) . _ „... . ..._,.._........... _ . .. . . . , . , . .. • . .. 1 . . 1,, SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT FTG. SAD FEE WATER! 1 1 . .-e, -•!.. .• ; .. sEwEg: — OTHER L -- --- - • ) ' • • . . ... . . - • . . .. . SPECIAL UTILITY CONNECTION CHARGE-WATER UNITS c.,/,/ SUCC FEE • , _ Single family residential dwelling unit$940/lot x ,I e3, 7600. ApartMent, Condo, each multiplex unit$545/ea.unit x . • coMMit!'cla1/1Pdxsir4I$.1?6/$1.tt•of poirtY x -• . (not less than$940.00) ` • 1 ' SPECIAL UTILITY CONNECTION CHARGE-SEWER UNITS SUCC FEE Single family residential dwelling unit$470/lot x 'V 7r- Apartment,Condo,each multiplex unit$270/ea. unit x Commticial/Industrial$.069/sq.ft.•of property x (not less than$470.00) ITOTAL: I $ . • 0 2 The above quoted fees do NOT include InsPcOlon!Cgs,side sewer permits,r/w permit fees or the cost of water meters. • Pc' " 711 ) f-rA47--e^fet- .7a 41-1-4- . -1-44i) ,4141a diteia,11--ii. -e-ii-e-sJ21Z 7M2 . • (..-,A, -64e . to-D-44-4-e. - • 5' .. A hy( . 7,et---/f-e-ie Signature of Director or Authorized Representative DATE ) l' • • wit.d.m.i.o.fet991/11,. ,`) , ' ' ?rt.' ' ' '' •••'••'-''''• •• - • '' ' • •'--i• .•r.'.'.•:'•":,••,-• ::•••......);:•••••• ,..,;-;-. .;'•:•;; . ...•:•. ••. .., • •' ••••• ...,•...:••••.:.••.•• , .. , •:,•:-,..: ..-: •,, • •••': Oi •••;:•:',..;•• ..i.:;! '..''' ,;•• .;) t•'.•••••••.:1•1•;',',..:',f (. ., ;••:'::!•• .!;•.•:, • ,•••:: •,..)t:•,1. ,1).).. .,•••*;:;•••:•••'•:.'::' ...-';''•••• .:. • ' • .17, • '•.• . , ),. ;'.......1•1;',..'••• ' ''.'!. " : .',.... '..,;:'..,•.: •,••;::•, -..,•:j•! •,, ,;:,.....?• '....,•i,'',..:'•:.( •• ••• • .! ..),;•;.41:1,,,..„•!..'711.'•,';•'•:• '.,.•••••,.• ; ••.:;.•,.... •••••: ',i ''•., .. •,1. . :. :.• fo,••.:• •.: •)1,- ,• •'..;:,•):1•• '):','• ••,'• •••)••: :••,...4 ".4::•'•I''::1:: .....::.:: I•'!..''.,;;'•j•!'...../.1.:1'•'!...•.111' '...•••i:••••(•••••• '••••'••••••;•••: •:•:.1';'1.;."':' ' ••• • •?/:••' . '•• ..1,:e.':'• , . '.,.: !:• : I ".. ''. '1.I.'. •;'•! • !).',''..)+‘• ,, .••;'i ,i .. .).)..;.'• ',..•?.;'i:••.''.:1•1,'.; %?..11;t21•••••;:.':.;.'•• '..I. •• :.'"••••": "••••• ''...'. ••••' •• gi. . , lt,!;,,' ' ' ••• .; • t.....i• . 1).!. .• ,•*.•', ,..2!.,....,•,:;„1., : ••!:.1....4'.y.,.:',,...•..• •,:. ;1•••w...'• .1c: .i' ii' \: •••i.. ': . ; :. • :I.,•:;?; '•. ,Iv....... • .. ' i!j,,,,•; • '.., f.. ••:!::....:'... ..'::'.••:i;'•;•,'!'i ....d1;:.::ki,.,::•;!) ,....:.;? ..:•:1::;!:..:.}:t ''.11.:•••, :::•:::•.":•!•:,:. ,:t...1:4.i...'';'.•...;....[.' .. ......./ • '''.. '..• ,•:. : -11,.::•.: • , : ..i• . ...1.' ''' ; • ,I''.... ..:1 :•i: '.1.......y,.': . •,I.;.;;'.1iii':-'• ' ''.,,,•..:, •;:.I..,•,•I•,'.:.• !!,.:'.. ...:..•....•I;..•..,i:. .••..•..!:'.../!..-.H.!)...•..Lp,'•i•..••,.•.3....' 01-..:.•:,::•(i.!•.,;::P/:Y•,•:'1sk, .';1'I..:. •':•'%..'•"•••,•?!!••:.•',•;1:•.•t••.•.%"•::':;••,.::I•Y,,',V,V I ; ; ...".r.'''.''.'/1.... I •',.:..,.;.'••• ,... .,...:..... ••;..''; • •• .• ..1.,.',......• • • i:i.,t..:'::t "'....I•:,:,: !''.'i.....,.;:.-::: .).•;•IY,..,;,',.; :.:.:-.", ..-,, ...• • : .• .);..., i. ••• . .,... .i1S,.,. .,. . , . .:.,..,.:;.;.,.,..::. •.. . , :741,•.:•••,....!;.i:,....;,.:;•.,...i.."........,....:.,;•:,..-1::..ii:'•ii•:,.....,..... ......: • •::- .•- : .: : . .:1.f.: • . •• • • ••,,,i • . 0 • ,• ...... ." •••. ' s•••••.kr -fi,`,...:..!•••,•i••••; •,;!.,! •1...• ki•••!...,.•••...:,,),•••••••. ••: ..••• . • .• . :. .e•-••• .• ••• • 1.! • .i.:•: • -•• • ,•••••••: •:. , • ...;••• ....;••,..12. ';.• •-•:..?•1.•;...•••.• ••.!.,•• .,?..,••,:h•-•.•-::•••••.1.. :.:•..,,: .. •• ;.• • • • • .. ,. .. , • •:i,c ., , .,•.• :;•• • t••........ •i• , . .• ., . :.,...e r.; ..': i:',..:.,. 't.• ' '.l ::.'• • • .. : .. ...: 1:,' 1' L!, z .• ! , .:.' .:!.!' •. . • ,I.:1:* '!. • •• '!.....!•P '..: • ...: .' . ••••', :••••• •!.••: •. • ..:...•• •...!..! :• ,..1...,:..‘.1,,,•‘,1,',/•:..;••• 'A.',:': :'.::.A.:.,:211,.:•f;:,..'..; h1,••'4:•!•••: :.::•' •!. ••• :••". •. ';'•;:.. .. ••.: • .. •r,••• .• •. :'. ;::. •..,41/. ,.. :• • .. : ,.•!•1, •.: .;:::.•..• !_:,,,,,,, ,..fi.:...:0;,?.,.• •4..,:.;,.%.,i4 r:,:....,• .!!'••:.••,)'.;::,.,'.:.'::',;•';•,0';'::••••'.1 ,••••••••, .•••••.::'; ',, .•;.t.;••• : .•.•• •• ;•.0, : • .. • • ••••••.: Al..'•' '' ./'••.. : .• :.;.. .. !.. ,%•' i'z''•:!-',:i. „i:.,.,..;vi .,..,...:i.,.\;,.........,..!.....•... .,....-'!••,'. ..,.,•' .:.;.....!:;..-.:;.::.,;,:,,,4:7:‘..:;: .!:• .. 2:•...:';• ••:.i'..:::. . ... :, • .. .:.c.... • : '. ,.',1•,!,..i';• . • ' . .; • :' •: : - :•:• •••• •:::•••::1.7:';'.•••:'[.. :•:•,',..:? :, -: ::::Yi•:%•,•:'..:'...;;.•!':';'•`:!!‘.. ,:1- •-) :!..:. ..': •.'•:':. •;. •:/•;:•:.: • : ":•:1'.;;" . '• % • ', 'I),F-'.',' • ; ; ; :'.",...'• ..,... . . . . ';':•••••:•',•• l''...'.;:::•..i...!.•'•••;,'.:•• f•;'•••:',;: •;':''.,:i•::•4;•':•••)'',:•-___ 1••:'• t •.'• .- ••'''::•• '"';!'":. • ..;) . ,,k, ' • .1.•-• . .. .. .,le; ..i.....;' ..•.. • :. ... :. • ......' ...?..:';i'r....--...:".. ••••• :•.:..• .....:1 • . .. . ;i. . DATE: 47f// /7??' SIGNATURE 0 DIRECTOR OR HORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV.5/90 devlvehl REVIEW COMMENTS TRANSPORTATION-DEVELOPMENT SERVICES PRELLWITZ SHORT PLAT SHPL; V108-90 NE 36th Street and Aberdeen Ave. NE April 11, 1991 1) Private roads are not allowed unless approved by the Hearing Examiner. 2) The proposed private road does not align with the city's street grid plan and therefore is not recommended as proposed. Also the proposed private road makes an intersection with NE 36th Street which is not allowed per city code which refers to street intersections offsets less than 200 feet shall not be allowed (code no.9- 12-8G14). However, the westerly property line aligns with Monterey Ave. NE street grid plan which would accommodate lots 1 and 4 a ces and Aberdeen Ave.NE right-of-way would accommodate lots and access. 3) Street improvements required to all .approved roadways abutting proposed plat is a follows: a) Curb, gutters and sidewalks per city standards. b) Street lighting. c) Appropriate street signing. d) Roadway paving. e) Provisions for roadway storm drainage. 4) Appropriate roadway plans for all of the above is required. 5) All approved roadways and utilities to be installed before final plat is to be signed by the authorized approving authorities. 91 CEM054 Rev;cwe4 I3•T — rnrw nrpirT:om • pgPmmilEilt or KAINNINO/Bu11-PINQ/pueup WORKS : APR 0?pEvo_orIvIENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET oult..Q!!*4 piyisioN I •AA'n-„IviA/Q ECF- APPLICATION No(S).: sl-IPL;V-108-90 cr ne.--isrohr NroN - pROpONENT: Douglas Prellwltz APR 0 199 PROJECT PrellwItz Short Plat ' ( it/E'r) BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks to short plat a 1.5 acre parcel Into fpur lots. LOCATION: SEC:32 TYVNSHP:24N RNG:5a NW Corner of NE 36th St&Aberdeen Ave NE TO: PUBLIC WORKS DI VISION SCHEDULED TAC DATE: 4/26/91 ENGINEERING sacTioN ____TRAFFIC ENG. SECTION .; UTILITIES ENG. SECTION • FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION CONSTRUCTION FIELD SERVICES DEVELOPMENT PLANNING PLANNING &TECHNICAL SERVICES PARKS AND RECREATION DIVISION OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING.' PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5:00 P.M. ON APRIL 12, 1991. liEv!EVVING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: CAA -AarN APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED / 7 r F.118/ maiult--S 7‘-r /1-6( eten(Er/Z5-Y60-6)45Y-ro--e-- 1! • DATE: SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV.5/90 devprohl CONSTRUCT;` " FIELD SERVICES `Y DEVELOPMENT PLANNING PLANNING&TECHNICAL SERVICES PARKS AND RECREATION DIVISION OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5:00 P.M.ON APRIL 12,, 1991. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: 1('h ?reAtiv\lan APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED e Ailoc • • ,%-1- ./e1444617t t../71%*i°1/./</14 ede-A--X44 / DATE:. - f�1 4SIGNATUR -OP IRECT AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV.5/90 devMht REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: S &CNA f\Ree.--rCa011ern ry APPROVED >PPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED 1-17' e-te • . / ‘1, -2.e..-ce 74-L. OpeeZer c �� Z4/ ,,12-eedee/r ,,Zd4 f/Pe--ee4-- /e) DATE: 44---e-7.4.---; SIGNATU of DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 5/90 devrv,h DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION CONSTRUCTION HELD SERVICES !! , DEVELOPMENT PLANNING PLANNING &TECHNICAL SERVICES milks ANDRECREATION DIVISION 1,1 OMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. "PLEASE prioyIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5:00 P.M. ON APRIIL.12, 1991. FiEvipWINQ DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: S+09\-K\ tiadex-- AprnovEP APPROVER WITH CONDITIONS )('NOT APPROVED YPsY CAE-6.-Ic cbilftli At40-6*-- 13(7-S/N ., 4. c I°5P•75 r P6/itty4u.-.. CcAlve.1:614Q6. on /1 _C.c).KD /5 _pt rcif Pc)()/Y6./ovc- il tpKr/1 1 t_siNG_ fr Sr 5(196 OP t( a TTI /I/LA c(E.... .- ;! 6'07'1 rr" Pm/A/0-r: Pc-iti 6 N..9 P 1 -.s 1 q-11 -b/(0//WW-P: &I-cm_r 77Es i At ftc co x p41\ic : u_,(7.19 /Tic lc 1 At a.. coc.iy 7y 5wqr4-cE e)//7 TA' PC-5.( /'( ,444A(b46., :(.'s Tr 7-r--(r( e°,c) 5P (91 6 I S' , 5 tr ‘-t) 5T771(G •!4-N 40 /°,401°0P CQl<IPW‹ 4- I N G-. Olki !!' ri-GE CF pLerr, 964)(-<, Mill-0(A/C- p-&07e. '/Air ithitP pi_411 06)/tice_oki,g 16 135: 22 5r3 y '; i '/-4-20' 5c. fAtt-F— DATE: /'-(C) awcri-AVARE- 11:To I AkiumoRizEDRENIEs If 1-4.1-NE REV.5/9c demeht , • •rs• REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS ›clIOT APPROVED ; No-r IN ("e-7-4r-Pg /f/1.0A0T64/(241, 2. 5/rff to I WA, 6-Yps'Y c A', /:.-5f4:D44/4/6'6-6' 6/1'S/A/. c (7 kr R is mo-r 4 v4/6,f4,45-_ - ro 5 f 7 ,-- -.:, u}4.--Lv ,b ,c 7... /07 cpfri toe f alieNs/ ' ' '& 4/Y 9fr2s (914 tlyr-ofc .:1- 17e/6( (/f , 66-- 4 Phi'q6'0 ,Eb lc 17-fr41,5_ //Yr."-/f(t--fiibA) 61,c1Y6 tiarfi ioes4E, l.f l't5 a40 , /. • (/1/ //,1-6,6, s ti/frricy ) 1 . £i k) 50La 76 to-6qt)- 067- A 35A v(c, - /K/tre .44itiy 7- a_)//- 1 1 WP 107 41\1,0 fia/yreiN To coiv/Ye_cr 76 TR; ! pip wi 7E_ 6 PobliZ 0(5/oom4, 5y777,/r7s peM c/1\y coop .5- s--=,L 1! OP. cqtyl(ppi,b-,-De tz- 7' . bthig,„Y 500,5A5 (.11 9 /1/-0(VC- elid ./Mi nv6 N. (1 iv° N a 307 5/7fhr NtqeiY/4 - .g evg,L oa 4 4-qw/y5o, , 1 5, lie-,<Iic rA( P/va- 41\0 /9001a9 *---1) Co6goe1r-5 / 1/00 (--7- fo°7,°4/1175.) (VVI) Ft N/ ffb•-,0 f70 rit_k -7/ys 66' PI e • © F /4(17. • - 0 ./a .fr ,i ,i,c.pd ...-7....-53(-7...._ DATE: C -/0 - 7/ SIGNATURE tk p4 •FC Op AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE 4g, 50041(r' .9. /'X-3 9'// 5 4e--'1,5-A' D,144e ,f(Y6S/ c--le-vf._ / ..- t rit..:-; z . v b/90 , , .. .. lowvot -) • CONSTRUCT, "IELD SERVICES t' * ^ DEVELOPMENT PLANNING PLANNING&TECHNICAL SERVICES PARKS AND RECREATION DIVISION OTHERS: . COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5:00 P.M. ON APRIL. 1?,-1991. REVIEWING G DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: une-P ��IA APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS OT APPROVED 1 v\a�ac r5 4[hL.S rvv UN 1 �� . 'Cur�et (�� lan . Cce nct (91to-}"h • J2 • SU�`�ln o ,e - ro a.\ .15 vl -� l 4 , erti�;�n�r� t o5 • C peers acid - Co1e �° eve C ctv\L-8- a u r � oC4' deAc(L) one-r\L5c-9 \,(keeilVt- 7°Pe-t4W(le, PW° c\c- D a_Nkft-- ` and serve a dAertdo 4\dviCaV 1( DATE: I , SIGNATURE 0 RE T R OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV.5/90 dewv$hl REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: Weer u I CSitA 4 4F-P/6f APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS X NOT APPROVED 1 i_OCArgb tN Am orve• kaNNFYO44E plfr'/04b- ! Gv/ 144//y r 460G 1�f3�-- Or�i /Y /41/fi 1=, z. �Xi�T1rYG � 4T �xTlND is& 6014r t/,Y T Fir en r913ant.6:4/x 4w-3 1&4--• 10$-57- A t- r ids TO FAST O/ 72 ' et. ti istow &o ci'r d-N 1=/f1E IYY, S 3, /O t 44y� `� �PFJ/ 6 r,®rye f?�t v�1 eN T: 5', WA145A It4 F r 'IRS 501C- 13e Go ors(N /N c� e ott- ace w(r1/ M r 466-/Pro:/ 1s, AND 1( ! f ' . 6, /1-rag (GM/0/W6. 1 f 5N'LC. /E on 22 x3y 101-e9N. 5/se i=7Ts) c,ugA T. pP v ^ Ga pkiF(yr f / S) , A' /1714 5,4-b F yi///fri,_pea,,/ev//t DATE: 7 -1° .5,/ SIGNATURERE AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV.5/90 • devMht csO :06/9 ikai:t , • sbi I 5 1 1 /7 ofiliviNisatIdOU da kid-0v Lb 4oloitild do atirtiVNuis' ()_z-i_irLi (r>"v(rYIT v r vi • Op LLo .2)c, \A-0 v-ii--.-rvic-Yvti if 'inn -11-rn c ' 1:72-11 4-4111 ck-L-1 r),4 97‘ iziOAolAcIAV ION • sNolitoNoo 1-111/A ciOnotiddv OmotiddV 4riatip ejAnat—ii) :mol'svocitit43tikatividaciommmA5 m.0 • ,,:twq•iedu BAIIViNasaUdatidaznio1LLA Io tio thdAo OtirildNOIS :alva WYWJ ife,reA) 01 • :i cianoildAVIoN SNolitaNOO rthM claii‘OtidAv— dOAoliddV :NOistAid/INattlitisidad ONIMaii‘og . • it tiladv NO lArd ad:§AEi 01\100f-id Ot-ti oi SiNjtiklitloO acilikotid asv id t4IJJM Ni docitAotki oct ainot-is Noilvoricidit ONicigvealt SNollsabOns Ito SINAtAgni o :SLiat-ii0 I NoistAto Notivauolii ciNV SAM SA9lAti3S1VOINI-Pil'8 ONINNVid ONINNYlci iNavicimAn5d NOlibniti.M00 NOISInici soot/was INaIntdo-GAAa • • �:$t�i ii:::::{:::ti' .::�i: y<;:i��r:4i>;}:v:$: iii$:i$i'ri::ri:.}$:•$::;{:;�:.•::$};:;:;:;:;:�:y;:}r,:;}:;:r. k�.. .ro. August 13, 1991 To: Gregg Zimmerman Mary Lynne Myer Gary Gottl Sam Chastain Penny Bryant Jim Hanson From: \ e) Don Erickson,Chairman Meeting...D...t .:::<: : : Air ii$t'h .......9........::::::::::::.•:....:::::................... :.•::..::. ......::.:•:::•.............::..:•::.•..: •::.:::<•::;:.:....:.: • 3 0:. cats :: ::>::>::::>::::::>::>::::<T.hird Floor;Conte en.c.e.l O.om.:..::::::..:.........:...:..::. :.::.:•:....:•.:•:........:........::•:::.•::::•::::::::.::..:;::. Agenda is listed below. TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE AGENDA AUGUST 13, 1991 Third Floor Conference Room Commencing at 1:30 PM TIME/KEY PARTICIPANTS NEW PROJECTS PRELLWITZ SHORT PLAT SHPL-108-90 (MARK PYWELL: 5586) Applicant seeks to short plat a 1.5 acre parcel into four lots. The project is located at the northwest corner of NE 36th St and Aberdeen Ave NE. BOEING TEMPORARY PARKING LOT ECF;V-077-91 (MARK PYWELL: 5586) The applicant is proposing to construct a temporary 333 space parking lot. Fifteen of the parking spaces will be reserved for van pools. The applicant has stated that this will not Increase the number of parking spaces available, but will replace parking spaces that are being eliminated for storage areas. The project Is located east of the 4-20 Bldg and north of the 4-04 Bldg. TOUMA ENGINEERS June 28, 1991 Mr. Mark Pywell, AICP Planning/Building/Public Works Department PLANNING DIVISION 200 Mill Avenue South CITY OF RENTON Renton, WA 98055 JUL 0 3 1991 RE: PRELLWITZ SHORT PLAT - SHPL-108-90 Dear Mr. Pywell: We acknowledge receipt ofyouur letter dated June 17, 1991. In reviewing Mr. Clint Morgan's letter to you we ascertain that the matter of the sanitary sewer extension and the opening of Monetary Avenue NE are not required. It is my understanding that Mr. Morgan and the applicant Mr. Prorates had met at the site area and reviewed the present street circulation serving the property. It appears Mr. Morgan is insistent on developing the west half of Aberdeen Avenue NE and rotating the private street alignment in order to provide an access to the proposed four-lot short plat via Aberdeen instead of the proposed access via NE 36th Street. Mr. Morgan is ignoring the steep topography along Aberdeen's 30-foot right-of-way and the close proximity of Aberdeen Avenue NE to King County Street 112th Place SE. We wish to reiterate that the development of Aberdeen Avenue NE is not only difficult, but it would be too close to 112th Place SE, less than 150 feet from center to center of the two streets. Further more, the private road accessing from Aberdeen Avenue NE will not meet the minimum distance of 150 feet required by the Fire Marshal. Mr. Morgan considers the future development of NE 36th Street to be a major east-west collector street. It was pointed out to him that NE 36th Street right-of-way west of Lincoln Avenue NE is too steep and the presence of structures within the project right-of- way would make it difficult to extend the street to the west. We therefore request to consider the access as proposed to the short plat via NE 36th Street because it does represent the most viable access to the property. Should you desire to discuss this matter with me, please feel free to call. incerely, Mo it "TOM" Touma, P.E. Civil Engineer cc: Doug Prellwitz D/40 15668 West Valley Highway • Seattle, Washington 98188 Phone: (206) 255-4100 • Fax: (206) 255-0945 t,^.,.w CITYF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works Department Earl Clymer, Mayor Lynn Guttman,Administrator June 17, 1991 Mr.Tom Touma Touma Engineers 15668 West Valley Highway Seattle,WA 98188 SUBJECT: Prellwitz Short Plat SHPL-108-90 Dear Mr.Touma: I have just received the attached memo from Clint Morgan. If you feel that these conditions are acceptable, please submit six copies of the revised short plat and a new PMT. If you still have concerns regarding this project, please letme know and I will schedule another meeting for you. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact me at 235-2550. Sincerely, 977def/LX:1 Mark Pywell,A Project Manager • 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 L: � J1 t. ' 4't • 99� CITY OF RENTON �,o ; ; . MEMORANDUM • DATE: June 14, 1991 TO: Mark Pywell, Seni.. Planner FROM: Clint Mo« an =n a l .ring Specialist SUBJECT: PRELLWITZ SHORT PLAT/SHPL-108-90 I have conferred with the Transportation Division to reconsider the above referenced plat as per your request which was initiated by Tom Touma's correspondence dated May 29,1991. We can support a proposed plat if the following conditions can be accomplished: 1) Provision for aligning the intersection of Aberdeen Ave NE a NE 36th Street to be provided. 2) The private roadway hammerhead to be rotated so the entrance is off Aberdeen Ave NE. Aberdeen improvement would only go to the entrance from NE 36th Street. It may be noted the 30 feet of existing right-of-way mentioned in Touma's letter on Aberdeen Ave. NE was dedicated by Clarence D. Hillman in 1907. Not the present owner as inferred. 910EM087 CC: Gregg Zimmerman P �(J� FAFNTO4 N 1 ss91 ,CITY OF RENTON C.- .' b vf® MEMORANDUM DATE: June 14, 1991 TO: Mark Pywell, Senior Planner FROM: Clint Mo an n- ring Specialist SUBJECT: PRELLWITZ SHORT PLAT/SHPL -108-90 I have conferred with the Transportation Division to reconsider the above referenced plat as per your request which was initiated by Tom Touma's correspondence dated May 29,1991. We can support a proposed plat if the following conditions can be accomplished: 1) Provision for aligning the intersection of Aberdeen Ave NE a NE 36th Street to be provided. 2) The private roadway hammerhead to be rotated so the entrance is off Aberdeen Ave NE. Aberdeen improvement would only go to the entrance from NE 36th Street. It may be noted the 30 feet of existing right-of-way mentioned in Touma's letter on Aberdeen Ave. NE was dedicated by Clarence D. Hillman in 1907. Not the present owner as inferred. 910EM087 CC: Gregg Zimmerman - tr zul,,,, V'. -11 11 4.14►1+"J 1 Ll 4.4.46V • L_Lli____JiM24C 1 -.)I 1 Trin - C7 ]1E) azin . • . i . . ;,.-;.4.,,..., .. • AOL P/T/ON TO SF 'r'TLG Jeo/e one'nor.eoorr. H.Al.Love.C.C. G.AF2DEN OF EDEtNi EDNA NO.. j I DM-SCRIPT-ION —t;;17. -- ,.a,�ri._r:.v——• - ^ ! - - `a, rv.a I. ••. 7fiia plot of C.D.Hi//mon3 Lake hbe/vngfon CardcnofEden I Addition/o.5co//k corn/or/sc5 orof/hc wca//hlo c half ofthe(N. I ; 1 � i ` I` 1 I • • E.*)one?Jotter of See/ion 32 T.P4.N.R.S.E.of Me WA1. I Co fie Indio/pain/a/hc 4 car Lehman xc3 1'9 orxl02,/hone N tt I 89 31..E./3.O4.P,3/7 ,05ence 5.o OP'w 2669..0 A'/hence S.89 14'W t!S ""' /.51/./.1 4 thence NO'09 E?674.26 A to in/ha/pant A//d,/anccs arc. as .flown an AV"pro>in foci.A//learing" air referred to o true me- i • ndion 1 3 6 r 4 D_DSc..TION • b iAlli, i mini' 1_11 know o//ma?by*ex pzxnh Aral the Hillman /n vcatmcnt Can- 1> 1- pony o alibi organized card cr45bi2.g under Ix /ovro U of A-Sta• • c s oT Washing/an,hovAS /12,onneipa/place.of busineas in Scot&Abe 1 and bang the owrxr n fie a+mpk of the Mx/cmprroirg Ibis prat of C.D. I ,111 r J.% I (I. Hi//man� Lake{roahinylov Gorden of Eden Addihonlo Seat&La�r.No 7 /any Cuvnfy K'asheyglon,doco here&declare Acs plat and doa lzrey d-di- 6 t I _J cn a/o the eksca af7he pub/ie forever a0 chre-6 and of/ey.s oo av rnonh;ipb/. r • h,n/nc s whereof he.sold Inc Hi//rrbn /nveeknentCompany,hls Gynr- • a • hie ororaufuticrr cat do board of 1rvstce,du/y paaxd,of o regular rneebng ).A. i•1 . ofaoid Evora,caused Jinx prr.sen/o /a tc erecu>ed in lb-core rate non:: 6u Clarence D.H///mon i/o p roidcnt,and L3czsie GYrrc Hi//mon ita•,krrc- II• ^� ir.7/77:re. • . /icy oral i/a corporate,x'/to be hcrrunta oired fro 2?rd.dayof✓u/y,Q/9o7, N. , , . cxscs :e'"`%`• The Hillman lnee3hnent Co 9 10 a V. ' By Clarence L).Hi//rr»n By Beaert O/it//%man I free,/F./fenny �Of NS fte rdcnt /h SecrecrysG 6'4 o. a •1: N •••• •-„ E N .. .._ ..•... 61 • [ ..I• t ,4 r -• Pi �3 s. " c F'� ' t a a . I tl • .•I.•. _ ,ram. r I Mr D. r _ 1 VOLUME/60F PLATS PAGE f6 n ' r r • RECORDS OF KING COUNTY f "� 4� s Z, ` O c e I e ::1 * JFlO V -• - :47.:./ — 4,1.-=rtp-. i frA,,__ . i • AI 5 4 ;I I ,TA ' .•.•' 1.✓ r IT-1 .:-0; .a•ti ii..!: x1s e ly f ✓? �;�;h ��,. • ..( �1 H `" - I -C. • : ai. —.—..,—r-.•�-A-v_----k--1� ;\ \ ::;AR ir..ram: or r•.±. rst Dry, t•- ...I Ecamincd and opprovcd Alin P7 day cf✓u/y A.D./3O7 `"`"' A.L.lea/cnlmc =``'` County Erymccr ter. �� -U \\ I I a4 -I4Ac• Cascade Western Co. , U oPE/v G O st 1e9.,a O T 654.03 __---- o Li - / 296.�1 o WAS! ' INGT0IN � • 101(1 9 s Forrest R Po1Jns /V//'�/ '/Zi ° ' ^, N l C1 / *0060 16, o 5 Ac. 1, 291.I' CS� C) - s. /� 654.25 — 624.24 __ _ p S.E. NO! 84TH OPEN ST.� 552.49 --___ '126 _-- J► 296 • ' 96 20124 Federal S. 8 L Ins Corp - 1.67Ac 1 /Federal 5.&L.Ins Corp. E ® E �l 32 a 1.rig) .o 9 , - ;}� t .... 'y 0 g AC W. D Junes (�o� j __ __ AC W. D. Jones - 3% U ' c i2 1, I I`1 = i • LA-- David E Jchnson ♦ 1.91Ac.O 2.10Ac. Wm. Belmond0 o U.4 /9 0 a 110 N (_l� - (S� 129' N , f' 3g35 ` 5 `� _=145.86 58 Si81 --220____`, 300 zoo --.----- i) 1,--- i -- , r� VIS • N N Q 7 e ' 380000 D -- I Cnrl T. Olson. Z Carl T. Olson I 0 0.16k. 84'35 ; 1.04At. 0,69AC. d43i� w - � 35 ie4 IS-1 63 1 - L-.)@-- W O 559.13 a20 ----------- 3O0= x > ," 3 , .. 382 L r - \`\�38i , 4.4IAC. Robert Nissen �a 5 I ,2 , „IE.., „wt. __________ -7_T"'_,--..---... _:- , .01 o Edmund J. Neumgn .;I :'25A . 416AC. '" ,.. , 2 .n ,n . �� /3) , I-- .1 3j,0 - r----6---N — C) 5- IV I 90© = i 9E3c 43e9 1 I 7`al ' 13o i 166 3767 Ei� 8k,_4 �I 6 4 3—_ -` lit - S.E.Noy 86TH OPEN ST v Y. �:, ] I Y I a FT- V --r r .., — S:,E. 86TH ST. h 6,, 111M - do tStVir ^ Clifford L Johnson <6 .., 8 — 5 _ 1if- ,m, .• �I 9 . _.,f�TI 12 , . -j f.AL�1 �l v u,f' 1�-•r 3 t t2_ n sail 9160 �41 c g� I e' i4 .h nolf.hil iA .l-,fSS/.�.R IJI 1„ ,nQ/ [CT ��' ------- Q I 151 „ S.E.< 87TH ,ST. $ r1 200 138J4 -S 111.Si I l5 4•• �I .. � vS. I l'. I1 190 I 106 / / Z I E130 O yes jP-►.eIIWirZ ' •v 6 " S 3 L2�-� �j� N r. I E � � SON . I C , SRO E T Z 3�00 /hroPoSe% ,i - — - o, i N -1°j 200 + -- • T— — - 1 N 2 0 1 ------- � 10 9 1e --- o I •A �; !/'� � I 11 12 nj I- 1. J — I 1 I -�I ±^ Z _ ' rr4Ar 6.341c. LJ ii 1+ 1 1 i�. b0 I' U. ;190� C I C-106203 1 63 G-ZC]°dT3-1 f3 U f� � O� � - !. 15, 200 15 l5 .3 -sal N;E. 36TH ST If z 'S' ;-H{ 88TH ST. °3� :� `� FG: OPEN „"� 240 1,� t4 i no 269'- m ` ' g • i °O 80 I 20 3G 60 =° I I i1I t� oI N 1 I � CI I tl la Iir9 4 1-4,.- W o 4\ (%,1 cl. tey — . -PI ..,_.,1-_, 1 i I ` LO . o 7 I I 1�� I •1 r :V w ,1�J�n i l03 , IS �. ` �Ip. 1 {}1---) I 1 I 350 200 1 j 2 - Q .'(A iies....t; Al II 1 I I ,� O 1 05-A-- - 150 _ I. _ 1 _ 1 LIj a t {5.E.--89TH--PL-i-_J • 0 365 86 �r2 13 yo 3,729�73 N 72 'CI p \� — - t 756 U CI I 1 ---- al 1 i W I\%-, �.• L I N 1 I-� I I 5 —��,`�� o) 9n i 1 Z N . ai _s I I' -I 4' - • 150 200 ' o ti�, I (A) L�-0 �} 3 E��3190 r3 ► . I LL MAN C . D (D,H L hoM �°A N ' � d �- -ko j y S.P. 23-76 I - - - --- I o 1 o N N I D N1 74 75 L (C) (3) _ I -, I, '�• I5 I lbo 160 150 itz 90 I 90•_ 1 90 I, N. E. Not 33 R D OPEN ST. 210 4".` j . ----'rWA----Srl 64" �T—&W° — LAKE WASHING11 TON �so 95J.10 i9, -«- 259 -.Y- 16` : ..:,.., :.: , al 4,4 A - ► RDEN - OF EDEN , ,. ----------- G-A- R-DEN OF! EcEN , 1 77 76 364 367 371 . i , 4 f- •.) 1 ON k ;, DIV SION ,el 1 TOUMA ENGINEERS May 29th, 1991 PLANNING DIVISION Mr. Mark Pywell, AICP CM,f}1="CNTON Planning/Building/Public Works Department 200 Mill Avenue South ��Y 9 � � Renton, WA 98055 RE: PRELLWITZ SHORT PLAT - SHPL-108-90 PAECEIVED Dear Mr. Pywell: This is in response to your letter dated April 26, 1991. We have researched the possibility of a gravity sanitary sewer line to serve the subject property. In discussing the future sewer availability from either District 107 or the City of Renton, we ascertained the subject area would be served by the City of Renton. The closest sanitary sewer line is situated in Lincoln Avenue NE or Jones Avenue NE more than half of a mile North of the subject Site. It is economically not feasible for Mr. Prellwitz to extend the sewer line from its present terminus to his property. We wish to comment on the Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) decision to open Monterey Avenue NE and Aberdeen Avenue NE for future roads. We are cognizant of the City's road grid system. However, we feel it is important to review the location, vertical and horizontal alignments, and more importantly, the topography of the area within these roadway rights-of-way in order to determine the feasibility of constructing these roads. The location of Aberdeen Avenue NE relative to the existing County road 112th Place is too close to one another and the cross slopes of the present Aberdeen right-of-way is extremely too steep to construct this section of roadway without major re-alignment of either one of these two roadways. The (TAC) requesting from Mr. Prellwitz to dedicate additional 20 feet from his property for Aberdeen Avenue NE. Lot 9 of C.D. Hillman's Washington Garden of Eden Division 7 which Prellwitz owns has already contributed 30 feet ( half of the street right- of-way ) for Aberdeen Avenue NE. 1/2 15668 West Valley Highway • Seattle, Washington 98188 Phone: (206) 255-4100 • Fax: (206) 255-0945 In reference to opening Monterey Avenue NE we wish to call your attention to the street grid system designed for the recorded plat of C.D. Hillman's lake Washington Garden of Eden, Division 7. The plat does not show rights-of-way for Monterey Avenue NE going through blocks 1 and 4. We also wish to point out that SE 86th Street ( King County designation ) is not a platted street, even though your grid plan shows it as a dedicated road right-of- way. Again, the topographic features and steep slopes at proposed alignment of Monterey Avenue NE prohibit construction of this roadway. -- We request that the (TAC) would review the physical location and topography of these two roadways and reconsider their need for these roadway for future traffic circulation in this area. Should you desire to discuss any portion of this letter, we will be glad to meet with the Committee at your convenience. incerel ;-� Mou - "TOM" Touma, P.E. Civil Engineer cc: Doug Prellwitz 2/2 ate %! ;. CIT'. ,JF RENTON +.may_ }` Planning/Building/Public Works Department Earl Clymer, Mayor Lynn Guttman,Administrator April 26, 1991 _ Mr.Tom Touma Touma Engineers 15668 West Valley Highway _ Seattle,WA 98188 _ SUBJECT: Prellwitz Short Plat • SHPL-108-90 = ' Dear Mr.Touma: The Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) met this morning to discuss the proposed short plat. The TAC noted that both Monterey Ave. and Aberdeen Ave. are on the City plans as future roads. The road dedications and improvements for both of these roads would be required,whether or not the private road - was installed. However, the private road is unnecessary once Monterey and Aberdeen are Improved. The applicant would be required to dedicate 20 feet on the east side of the project site and 25 feet on the west side of the project for these road improvements. The applicant would also be required to provide half- street improvements on these streets per City Code. An amended short plat map indicating the road dedications needs to be submitted for the TAC review. _ The applicant also needs to research the possibility of a sanitary sewer line operated by Water District 107 in 112th Place and the feasibility of connecting a sanitary sewer line from the project site into the interceptor line. We will need a letter from the Water District addressing this request. - = The applicant should be aware that even if the connection into the Water District sanitary sewer or a septic system was accepted by the City, that dry lines for the a future connection into a City of Renton sewer line would be required along all street frontages. The applicant will also need to design a storm drainage - system that will connect into the ditch along 112th Place. These improvements would be necessary prior to the recording of the final short plat. • :- = If you have any questions regarding this matter,please contact me at 235-2550. Sincerely, • Mark Pywell, P _ -_ _ =- ._ _ Project Manager - 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 7 • ,.,:: ::::> ::: >:: ::>::DEPARTMENT OE PLA1M.0NG BU.ILDDING ELIC:WORK :>:: : ........... ..: EC . �� ::: ::: ,. d-I I A ��.• : . • :<:« T�. ........ ............... ................... ...::. :. ...... ......... ...... ..........:... .. ........ ................... .......:.. :::;:.:.: :: : SAC KC I�Q�N® ...i.:::.:: :i i::i•:>::i :::>:::: :::: :>::::;>::>::::> ....i.:::;::::><: :...•;:<.:;:•: •;:. `i AI' ICANT • Chou I ....................:........ .....::. : :.::.::......::.:•:.•::.:•:..::......:..:...P.reliwitt5hgrtplati i i:i :;:<:; <:::m............::: :> >;:...:::::::::::::::::: :':: : .....N•IRONMI NTAL CHE±OKLE57. ............. Vf$HPL.:1.O$. .. . •:.::::.: ::::::: :. :•:: : :: :.::::: :. <:>::>:::::; ::<::::::::;:;•:D•:.:SCfRIPTION OF PROPOSAL The applrcant,seeks:tu:subdivide 1.$..acres.into.tour.lots;:: :: f•::: t :: ...... . .......... . ....... ::.�:.::..::..::..:::::.•::.•::.:•:.::..::..::.�::::......:..•... ........:...:::. :::::::::::::::or;:he.:fiiture::cgtistruction:.of::si.►1 Ce tam.. ..:.:omen.::7he.:: r 1 r r u na v>;::>:: :» :>:: ::<:> :>: ::� : :<:;::;.::•::;:::::: :.:;:.;:;>: : :.>:.: : ::::: geIo..s.aere. .....edl........d�r:ta.. . otde: .n..area. vr... T a Ci. . t C.s n k . ::.:...P.::.:•:.::y.:..::.:...:�..::..;...:::.....pp.cat.a.sveee.:s.aPpo. ae. a:: e v r 1 c .t .t .... .v. ......1?...::X...:p<o•:::de;as;:ess..a.::::e:o.s.oy.::a.Pr. e.:@:rvadl::.: >:;::>;:::.,: OCATION Op'PROPOSAL*:....::•: :i;i::::i::i::»: :he..project site:ls::located. on:the::nor. h..w.est•..corner.:.of::• r tl of. �..:::::: ::<:>::::::»>::::>::> : :::::.>::>:::i;<::::: i::;::>: : : ::::: ::: i::>::>::is>.:i::i:::...... ..e...n.e..se .. t. ..A r. ....G. Qn....:::N.: th::Sr.eet.an.d :be d.een.;Av ::: NE. • : :: :> :: : ::: : :>: : :>: : ::::::::>:: :: :> < :::: :: >:::< :>::: >:: ::: PRELL WI TZ SHORT PLA T T SW1/4OF THE NE1/4OF SECTION 32, TOWNSHIP 24 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M. CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON 1"=40' GRAPHIC SCALE a (IN FEET) I Inch- 40 II. BASIS OF BEARING- KCAS DATUM • • f 1 N 88T19'79.W 798.51' NS I I -o I C- I" JO' cl A _ LOT 4 . I ..-.. n o LOT 3 a L C .w�- N O-- b LU 2 .^.n2 Li W I 1. " . . I N I I • h n. 00' 35.00' n N �{. o N 88:r0'26"W I I2.25' 20,g 4.95' S.05' Q LI INZ 116.34' Z I 117.21 N 88'O26'W N 88'0'26*W 121.39' + " \ di A- 9070'20' 0 0 9900.40. n it V ►r v 15.05 io o Q '� T= 14.96' ii 4 ZI o� L.• 23.61' o ct Qo L - 2J.52' h2 W I J 2 LOT t a I N 10.u..a n. I. " 1 -t. LOT 2 III . • 'IV a.. �1 v 4 a � p- 89:7I'f 9- Jo' ,, h Q a R- 25.00' I `I o - T= 24.79 I 1 I L J9.06' 1 -SW CORNER 2 2 ' OF LOT 9, BlK132,26' 3000' 111 i ' 1 N 8851'22-W 273.90' I 1 JO' J0' 30' 655.11' N 885122'W ` I IJI0.22' /�` 147.16' - _X.� 181.19' - --� y — 30' NE 36TH STREET JO• EAST 1/4 CORNER OF SECTION 32-24-5 tacrpt Technical Advisory Commit Staff Report • 'Prellwitz Shortplat April 26, 1991 • Page 2 LAND USE 1. Whether the proposed project is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan zoning designation and with Goals, Policies and Objectives set forth-in the Plan? The proposed development Is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan designation of Single Family Residential and Greenbelt. The Comprehensive Plan defines the Single;Family Residential area as an area intended for detached single family dwelling units--not exceeding a density of six dwelling units per gross acre--and related low density uses. The proposed project provides a density of 2.7 units per gross acre. 2. Whether the proposed project is consistent with the Zoning Map designation and applicable Zoning Ordinance components? The project site is designated R-1, Single Family Residential, on the City of Renton Zoning Map. The proposed development would allow for the future construction of four single family dwelling units. 3. Whether the proposed development is consistent with the applicable regulations/standards? The proposed development is consistent with Renton Subdivision Code provisions, Including standards for lot sizes, dimension, and configuration. The Code requires a minimum lot size of 7,200 square feet.. The minimum lot size provided by this development would be 15,914 square feet. The corner lots have been platted to be wider than the interior lots. The applicant is proposing to provide access to the four lots via a private road. In accordance with Section 9-12-8.X.1.h.the applicant has submitted a variance application requesting approval of the • private street. The Transportation Systems Division has noted that the location of the private street does.not provide the required off-set from the adjacent public street intersection (see City Code Section 9-12.8.G.14) and that the proposed street does not comply with the adopted grid location for streets in this area. The applicant does need to improve Aberdeen Ave. and Monterey Ave. which will eliminate the need for a private street. The applicant is proposing to develop the lots on septic systems. The applicant needs to investigate the possibility of connecting with the County sanitary sewer line. If this is possible it would eliminate the need for septic systems. If it Is not possible, Public Works would consider the use of a septic system. 4. Whether the proposed development is compatible with vicinity land uses. The area adjacent to the project site has been developed as a single-family residential area. The lot sizes within the area range from approximately 10,000 square feet to over a one acre In size. The proposed development,lots ranging in size from 15,914 square feet to 17,417 square feet, can be considered compatible with the adjacent land uses. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Whether the applicant has adequately identified and addressed the following environmental impacts likely to occur in conjunction with the proposed development. a. Land Use Impact: The applicant is proposing to subdivide an existing 1.5 acre parcel into four lots ranging In size from 15,914 square feet (0.36 acres) to 17,417 square feet (0.39 acres). This will allow for the construction of four single family homes at a later date. This lot is part of the area that was annexed into the City of Renton last year. At that time, the area was designated for single family residential development and zoned R-1. The proposed short plat is consistent with the existing area development which consists of single-family development. Mitigation Measures: None Required. • Policy Nexus: N/A taerpt I Technical Advisory Committee Staff Report Prellwitz Shortplat April 26, 1991 Page 5 The applicant will need to provide an agreement to connect to the County sanitary sewer line or if this is not possible an agreement to connect with City sanitary sewer lines when they become available. Mitigation Measures: None Required. Policy Nexus: N/A g. Construction Impacts Impacts: No construction impacts are anticipated in conjunction with the platting action. When construction does begin, It Is expected that there will be both on-site and off-site construction Impacts, including dust, debris, noise, light and glare. Staff will recommend to the Hearing Examiner that a temporary erosion/sedimentation control plan and a construction management plan be required for this development. Mitigation Measures: None Required. Policy Nexus: N/A Staff recommend that the applicant provide an amended short plat that provides access In accordance with the Municipal Code. s .I; i!:!:;:!,!:!:!,,:!.,:: i!!...:..........!..........!..:...,..............,.....!I.!!!!!!:isI,!,:...,..:...i..;..I:!:::::...::•:•:,!::,:�!:.:..,.....,...... . .: ......i:• IL,I.yI:I!I:I:IIIIII!,:•:.!::.I:..!.. .......!.....!..:.... :: Q I :Q.Ur::�8V�8....,::•::::i�i I. ... ............:.I.....�...:....I.i..........f.......,.....:..::�:�:��!:I:!!��:I:i!:!:I.I!::..,.....�:,...:...!....:.I.I...I........:..:a.:..!:.!::;.I I!!I.j.,,l;,I.!�I�1::,•:..:.iii.,.:.:.:ll.l. .......:.....:...I,..I...>aftacktgqd...f..r..Y.......... ..........:�....:.,.:.,.:.,.,,.,,,.:.!:,.!.:.:.:.::..,.:..,.,,:..:.:.:,.:�,,.�:�,:.:,�,.:.,•I.::..I.:.,:.:...:::.::.�:�::I::�.,::::!::::: �;�•1.. ............�:.::.•::.::..�:..::.::•.•. 11 • • Jf tacrpt tacrpt -- " I _, DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF- APPLICATION NO(S).: SHPL;VA08-90 PROPONENT: Douglas Prellwitz PROJECT TITLE: Prellwitz Short Plat BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks to short plat a 1.5 acre parcel Into four lots. LOCATION: SEC:32 TWNSHP:24N RNG:5E NW Corner of NE 36th St&Aberdeen Ave NE TO: • PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION SCHEDULED TAC DATE: 4/26/91 ENGINEERING SECTION • TRAFFIC ENG. SECTION UTILITIES ENG. SECTION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION CONSTRUCTION FIELD SERVICES DEVELOPMENT PLANNING PLANNING&TECHNICAL SERVICES PARKS AND RECREATION DIVISION OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5:00 P.M.ON APRIL 12, 1991. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: pip petelt . APPROVED V APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED • Zde • • DATE: l/ SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPR TATIVE REV.5/90 devrvshl . PROPERTY MANAGEMENT FEE REVIEW I• + (tit/DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET 10 PLAP4 REVIEW ROUTING SLIP I ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET C OTHER • APPLICANT: .. ift/tv44) JOB ADDRESS: . 3 LLY , 1 A j,} v" .?,-A -- �� NATURE F WORK: I . 'C.44 RECEIVED FROM. COMMENTS DUE WO# DATE RECEIVED BY nN ��a v��0 + PROPER MGMT. -1414(--- ��A.. 1� GREEN # P Or(dF�E ,,.,/ PR ,�� �991 L� FEES APPLIED II NEED MORE INFORMATION El LEGAL DESCRIPTIONP �r. A� , ,a El NOT APPROVED FOR 13 FRONT FOOTAGE CI SQUARE FOOTAGE �� �,i' APPLICATION OF FEES El VICINITY MAP 13 OTHER It is the intent of this development fee analysis to put the developer/owner on notice,that the fees quoted below will apply to the subject site upon development of the property. All quoted fees are due and payable at the time the construction permit is issued tol install the on-site and off-site improvements(i.e.underground utilities,street improvements,etc.) PRIVATE DEVELOPER HELD PROJECT COST LATECOMER LATECOMER AGREEMENT NO. PER. FTG. FEE , WATER' SEWER ^Q -. OTHER' _ SPECIAL1ASSESSMENT DISTRICT FTG. SAD FEE WATER p • -•-•el -- SEWER' _D -.. OTHER SPECIAL,UTILITY CONNECTION CHARGE-WATER UNITS SUCC FEE SingleIfamlly residential dwelling unit$940/lot x Z3, '76 a Apartment,Condo, 0• each multiplex unit$545/ea.unit x Commercial/Industrial$.126/sq.ft.of property x (not less than$940.00) SPECIAL UTILITY CONNECTION CHARGE-SEWER UNITS SUCC FEE - r Singlelfamlly residential dwelling unit$470/lot x Apartment,Condo,each multiplex unit$270/ea.unit x Commercial/Industrial$.063/sq.ff.of property x ' (not less than$470.00) TOTAL: $ ca The abo a quoted fees do NOT include inspection fees,side sewer permits,r/w permit fees or the cost of water meters. x, '' .7r. j'd-rA-17-..€,0-t. "d-st-ki- . AuAit) 74-6ea e tte_ 4141-i_eic 1 • sae st. `,A, —64i t-A-=A-1--- . a 3. 4 jat.a.. ki-t . ti // IV \.=73(z.„....7j.txt ?•*-'. Signature of Director or Authorized Representative DATE .n.a...w ia..r./unnr ' ( t. • ;ft • it wt •ot,:' '.{ • F q :••, ff 'i• Tll M ''1 it , Y ,tp '. ':+L'' • „ •1 •'• . ;.• I �' +• 4 2'r ji:. I l u :!, • ttom. ffa-c.'1� v�-c f�- DATE: 42 /// /7?" "44 HORIZED REPRESENTATIVESIGNATUDIRECTOR OR " REV.5/90 devrvshl REVIEW COMMENTS TRANSPORTATION-DEVELOPMENT SERVICES PRELLWITZ SHORT PLAT SHPL; V108-90 NE 36th Street and Aberdeen Ave. NE April 11, 1991 1) Private roads are not allowed unless approved by the Hearing Examiner. 2) The proposed private road does not align with the city's street grid plan and therefore is not recommended as proposed. Also the proposed private road makes an intersection with NE 36th Street which is not allowed per city code which refers to street intersections offsets less than 200 feet shall not be allowed (code no.9- 12-8G14). However, the westerly property line aligns with Monterey Ave. NE street grid plan which would accommodate lots 1 and 4 access and Aberdeen Ave.NE right-of-way would accommodate lots 2 and 3 access. 3) Street improvements required to all approved roadways abutting proposed plat is a follows: a) Curb, gutters and sidewalks per city standards. b) Street lighting. c) Appropriate street signing. d) Roadway paving. e) Provisions for roadway storm drainage. 4) Appropriate roadway plans for all of the above is required. 5) All approved roadways and utilities to be installed before final plat is to be signed by the authorized approving authorities. 910EM054 1Zevicwc.d 6? • r,T/fl r'77a.rTON • DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET APR, 0 2 1991 . 131-M-DIN6 piVISION S .: SHPL•V-108-90 CmonfiFrovro ECF- APPLICATION NO( ) . � . A��tx, EnrroN ;PROPONENT: Douglas Prellwitz 31991 PROJECT TITLE: Prellwitz Short Plat ' IV :BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks to short plat a 1.5 acre parcel Into four lots. • ,LOCATION: SEC:32 TWNSHP:24N RNG:5E NW Corner of NE 36th St&Aberdeen Ave NE ;TO: • .1 PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION SCHEDULED TAC DATE: 4/26/91 ENGINEERING SECTION TRAFFIC ENG. SECTION UTILITIES ENG. SECTION • ''• FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU . POLICE DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION CONSTRUCTION FIELD SERVICES DEVELOPMENT PLANNING • PLANNING &TECHNICAL SERVICES • PARKS AND RECREATION DIVISION OTHERS: • COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING' PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5:00 P.M. ON APRIL 12, 1991. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: l._6-AS Alan 1c e—S APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED F/18 .M0./Ultjj y‘r frr/(e V7 f / 61-7 -53 . ' t • kkJJ 1 a DATE: � --I SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV.5/90 devrvshl ' Mv`a_OPWIENT SER\ty-iS LAVIbiUt, __ __ .• , 0:;\ ____ CONSTRUC FIELD SERVICES _. , DEVELOPMENT PLANNING _ PLANNING&TECHNICAL SERVICES . PARKS AND RECREATION DIVISION OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5:00 P.M. ON APRIL 12, 1991. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: APPROVED ' PROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED I ,(-/714.46Y/le"-t4 , . _ 1 ,(.- zEl: DATE:. • biGNATUR E. IRECT6R OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV.5/90 devivehl - , . .. . . * REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: S ay-N nfera- kier-r) -)1APPROVED >4PPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED ( ,0 erZ ,ta,c,41,11) (4,..7 „te,,,,,,e,4 er_.e.-t-_ 17-44-4- '-r/ LA.-e---t— / (ValeW, geo-,-"ip: / t r Az <1-5:74----- - . DATE: SIGNATU OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE ,--s-e ----C:7 -1------------ REV.5/90 dovivsht , • -••• • -• 11 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION CONSTRUCTION FIELD SERVICES 1;• DEVELOPMENT PLANNING PLANNING&TECHNICAL SERVICES PARKS AND RECREATION DIVISION 11 OTHERS: 'COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. !PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5:00 P.M. ON Amin. 12, 1991. IFIEVIMING DEPARTMENT/PVISION: Si-c•IN-YY1 U.)11E:ter-% 1(. APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS . J 'NOT APpROVED111. • , N VP Ct AEI ,DM/ 6/9-- /N 4' • Cl°5 ---Sr bRAINA-ae- CcA4vEy/Wqs 0_ccoD is _NT-cif' RoNvvpyc._ •. tic_)Km el 443/%?G- soa op qaTr1r-AcE-2. iS 36ciofi1a- piviiN46-aPIi AND D6-.51ct-i .b15(1/ic/40-g IY1-Cice27ES • /1-ccoxP4uc.-_• te,ow /Tio cochtry PF__5(q-A *OW cif , F,t- T.( 1)(Tt-(Ne Aoot. Wf 51(- 6.0 • xl57-i/y•c, AN p 10/4o700E_P cQ(\lregiik WE OF 1044-r, ,61b4‹.? e9u(40(Ne... /.-_.020-7,06kwyr- 4 1),27, p/strlrieF_,D 4.--04DA S , 1,6°: ILAN 96)4ix-okps re) 2 1:-(3 y /-; I 4.4-20 9 c4t-E_ 1, DATE: 7.-(0, -eq 4-A-11:V„ CARE-- --al'Cr-TO /AUTHORIZE. D REpRES NT,ATIVE REV.5/9 devrveht • •• • • rs• REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: Athilignegliagit30 Ewh.IP APPROVED ____APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS , NOT APPROVED • ;1,107 I N (71'thr -AR 4//0A6TOA7 CM/, 2. !:511--E c,t/infmt Gyps c ,I)/0/106-6- 64-S/A/. filC (tr F-Wei-itz Is mo-7 11V4/64- e-45:- ro 5 U-)41-/V b/V71/c 111-tt/07 Call It/IN 6v6e)s 4/ twMcl.-,711-fe/R (44/1, "bE 1940e06b FtM/If&_ 1-QN6 tra1fil°64CE, /6/ 1i,4c-6,0 /b5// Lt 7ô ozsGem- oor A 55R (ce /1G/f544./rii)' &)//- fo-7 414P &Iwi/ 7ô c'Q'i.vNacr 7b 771/; . 1_//y44.,, cime/4-;140 /5 - 11/4176.: 6 gt064g Di6/001.-- .5y7/3,/f1s "oPif c/iNx coop 5- 57:- 3 d/ct '1 (1f cot‘twa-RV, 'ff _My 500,a/45 (1, 19 ilt.onic- 14/wifdePY /Iva N 4no N 36'r'7 5 rifla PO0W-gtr PKI0N146--eg will_ 4E0w/Y50, 1 fi<oea AV. T7/V6- 4 ' C06/7D04.5 F4P71015WY /#1-ly19 Ft,StMesz _p 0 F r4f77• • e: acV4 'Cr'de"t1_,—_. DATE: ti- ' SIGNATURE p •ECt R AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE S 50o/ii/T 2.?. //x-39 /' Dif-ge-«y6-s/ REV.5/90 levrvOI MVtLUrNit' l JC11Yiy a V:vtoeviv v,. iw CONSTRUCTIqFIELD SERVICES DEVELOPMENT PLANNING PLANNING&TECHNICAL SERVICES PARKS AND RECREATION DIVISION , OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5:00 P.M. ON APRIL 12, 1991. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: une-PW lk-A-gia . APPROVED )( APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS OT APPROVED /� 1 .mac c.rkk-AC5 Y or( bt . ' C� �e t l OIM :Plan L�� � S � �xnd. (����h e.( t Cr\ Le ', NJe SE sou-k o1 ! !cee _ ro 1 ;s -tom. Cce . Inecs c� ernO Co s s e l 0 r�eels'J� !pt ,_ IN t S-&V - Li3Q 1/•‘40. , id.- e A ��c a Ire� r o ' 4U deCt#0yer. ad • �CeTope_ -� Cie, pA,(0PLC acta-- d serve 0,_, \stlen-A ��1 D �� DATE:1 /c. -) f& iq 1 SIGNATURE OF f/A,(D RE T R R AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV.5/90 i devivshl 1 DEPARTMENT DIVISION: W LIMA1Cs P REVIEWINGt '1 �r640 , DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS ,' )C NOT APPROVED J..0 E'--0M7'gA IN 1.1134 ONe 0, , I'-faNNFYo4-LE PPea,, c qr 2-oN6' ( 3ac94 2. Ex ir1/6 l A t tv/474,7Z04//11 r4l-o• A M,D��/Y /p,. All= :3, r-x r-PIY.D ' w4T L/(Yc- FM' yl 19 5J4 /y /9 ))&4 0v6.57-ec,1 A 1 N G NE 6 or s I7R,� 7 7 Mg-A°M°i 6/195A7}" Z./iye- 4 616 ui Lo cr47lo N d p g / (411T A4Fi9'yv4P� RES A LblY6 i44 v e�T 6et. /1Y C i �c .D rY !e/�h7 of- Qv4)( , .... , �� tu,�7�� M F~r�r�s sue« !3� c �T� OK w(n//N FifS6til6"-N iS, A No 11(0 7 IN A v61kta"/)rr 6 Dttilrr all. fOlIONOfre41FN(5( s/N'LC_ 6E oN 27 '.x3$ /11914N 5/ i5-Ts) orD4 (e -rab To 0)47•5-R oNC 6tE : J "=- p ; C /Pre:If 4-i(V,. ril6F/LaS w/LC p A F G u!/ia1� c4 C -F�' 7, a 73V'AeT In '1)� v : Go pti1�'1'VT �/5 S) 104A 44T7'4. /f5-J F 564/--F7: o —`-4/.�/1/tr aieeezereit , DATE: 7 '-1 ' -�r. SIGNATURE !` 'REQBQB-eR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV.5/90 devrvehl 1j iL DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION —7-- , CONSTRUCTION FIELD SERVICES , . DEVELOPMENT PLANNING • . : . ' PLANNING IA TECHNICAL SERVICES PARKS AND RECREATION DIVISION ____OTHEP§,:____ -------' COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN vvntrNo.• PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5:00 P.M.ON APPII-12? 1 .1. • :" .. i . . .. . . .. gpvimilo pEFARNENT/PylsioN:. ., , di t l . , _. ‘1_.APpppyp APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS . _NOT APPROVED 1 , , . ' . . . . . . • • !!I1,i . .. . ;1: H Ir. • , , . . , , . , . .. ii , 1. . !I, 1 DATE: OU7111 . SIGNATURE OF DIR OR OR , ,p HORIZED REPRESENTATIVE R. 5/90 . . dovivsm . , I . ;93pvipviNG DEPARTMENT/DIVISION • _e,,,,,,r, da,,,..1 i,1 , , Ap,ROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED1' ___ . , 2 1 LPL- s\•4‘A- ii • --a-D-52-a- 1 1--4A-47. I III: \ii\ k•C)c‘l'- L%i - .lik-Itit- Q \f,---e--4--A--a- t,-- 1 • 11 . tox.4 ,Q4_. irt__+.3M.LiKL)L. '?. i C • -0A-6---r--. ' t-,\A-7.-71-1\---ii• tirr-4 . 0 Cs--- c-k_. CA .UL, , 11 II, ---c,Lia_t .0",af .---12--" °•1\-Q- P-12L- °--- ` .5(° i / F..,c_ . • rvt--e -c---4--.4 0:4:L4i,A, J (--/a--4--A--2--P-0 • ., , IAJ‘-- ,--. 1 1 s- 1/ .:- SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORED ED'REPRESENTATIVE 04-1L1\431-- IQ . .,..--- ---1,1-J • . . REV.0/99 - • . . .:77,7!„ • l'• devrvah '• • • _':. .' ' .) .., ,,• • • ,.,, , ., • ' t n ':` :: :'•:':2': 22:'•:`•: : :<'i i>3:>: :> : : :'•`?:<`• <2': : :i:': 1 .................... ......... .•.•..... .;;:.:•::.:•;::•>::.»:::<:::<:::» :::::::::::::::;::<::;:>::<:::::»::;::>::::;:: hnlcal..Ad::vis•o�r::. :>±i✓omm.. ... .. ......................:•::::::....... ...................:.:.: April 26, 1991 To: Gregg Zimmerman • . Kay Shoudy Gary Gotti. • Sam Chastain Penny Bryant Jim Hanson ' From: Doh Erickson, Chairman • Me.etinri• . 26' 1.99..::::.............................::::::::::::::..........................:::::. :.•::.:•:.:•:.•::..::.•::.•::.:•>:•;:<•;:>;::.:.;:•:•: .. ....... .. • .. ...............................................::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::;:.:.::.:;<•:.:�:.»:•::•:•;:•:;•::•::.:•>:.:.::.:<•::::::•:»::> >;::>::>::>: onterenc6Roo...............:..::::::::::::•...:::::................:•:..::.:::::..:.•.•::..::.•.....:..::...:..::..:.:� • Agenda is listed below. TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE AGENDA APRIL 26, 1991 Third Floor Conference Room • ' Commencing at 8:30 AM • • TIME/KEY PARTICIPANTS NEW PROJECTS • RUBBER DUCKY DERBY • ECF;SM-038-91 (Mary Savela: 6170) Applicant 'seeks a Substantial Shoreline Permit to release approximately 15,000 to 30,000 rubber ducks into the Cedar River at the House Way Bridge to float down river to the Senior Center, just below the Williams Ave Bridge. The Derby will be limited to one day and all rubber ducks will be removed from the river at the end of the race. The project is located on the Cedar River between Houser • Way Bridge&Williams Ave Bridge. CARLSON SHORT PLAT/VARIANCE ECF;SHPL;SMV;V-034-91 (Mary,Savela: 6170) Applicant seeks approval of a short plat and four variances. The project is located at 3821 Lake Washingtoh Blvd N. PRELLWITZ SHORT PLAT SHPL;V=108-90 (Mark Pywell:5586) • Applicant seeks to short plat a 1.5 acre parcel into four lots. The project is located at the northwest corner of NE 36'h St&Aberdeen Ave NE. • r'r r" "'r°trroN DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS APR DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET 0 2 7991 BUILDING DIVISION APPLICATION NO(S).: SHPL;V-108-90 cr rivYi orpnb ECF oN PROPONENT: Douglas Prellwitz Q 3 199/ PROJECT TITLE: Prellwltz Short Plat t(` 1V D BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks to short plat a 1.5 acre parcel Into four lots. LOCATION: SEC:32 TWNSHP:24N RNG:5E NW Corner of NE 36th St&Aberdeen Ave NE TO: PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION SCHEDULED TAC DATE: 4/26/91 ENGINEERING SECTION TRAFFIC ENG. SECTION UTILITIES ENG. SECTION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION CONSTRUCTION FIELD SERVICES DEVELOPMENT PLANNING PLANNING &TECHNICAL SERVICES PARKS AND RECREATION DIVISION OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5:00 P.M. ON APRIL 12, 1991. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: Cirv\sk-vu.cAvy J lICx..0 APPROVED x APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED d . 0.e61-1243-4C1-6 -(- /142-1A--- Ir DATE: SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV.5/90 devrvsht DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET , 41 o) ECF- APPLICATION NO(S).: SHPL;V-10:--'2 PROPONENT: Douglas Prellwitz PROJECT TITLE: Prellwitz Short Plat BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks to short plat a 1.5 acre parcel Into four lots. LOCATION: SEC: 32 TWNSHP:24N RNG:5E NW Corner of NE 36th St&Aberdeen Ave NE TO: PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION SCHEDULED TAC DATE: 4/26/91 ENGINEERING SECTION TRAFFIC ENG. SECTION UTILITIES ENG. SECTION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION CONSTRUCTION FIELD SERVICES DEVELOPMENT PLANNING PLANNING &TECHNICAL SERVICES PARKS AND RECREATION DIVISION OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION,SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5:00 P.M. ON APRIL 12, 1991. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: Taidce, AReexciarkiern PPROVED >PPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED d i -4.1-e c/L641--e-dt`'4 o? G2'2-4 re_7_,/_, A_ ,e-cv e72-43 • DATE: 44-9 SIGNATU F DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV.5/90 devrvsht PC �'NG oMSIOrrY OF N DEPARTMENT OF PUNNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WO APR 0 5 1991 DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEEN ON FIRE ic 1� y` ��� ENTIOIV BUREAU ED "tiT `' 1991 ECF- APPLICATION NO(SR k IU V PROPONENT: Douglas Prellwitz �' C PROJECT TITLE: Prellwitz Short Plat BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks to short plat a 1.5 acre parcel Into four lots. LOCATION: SEC:32 TWNSHP:24N RNG: 5E NW Corner of NE 36th St&Aberdeen Ave NE TO: PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION SCHEDULED TAC DATE: 4/26/91 ENGINEERING SECTION TRAFFIC ENG. SECTION UTILITIES ENG. SECTION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION CONSTRUCTION FIELD SERVICES DEVELOPMENT PLANNING PLANNING &TECHNICAL SERVICES PARKS AND RECREATION DIVISION OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5:00 P.M. ON APRIL 12, 1991. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: 1FrevenAionf� APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED A)14g- 7i/ait*A"" d"t' • . /"-- f1/141-27"-- /6-d.' .Z.e...4-11 "lex_epe-gpt... --Z-- , t•717df:44°/fr/ 4"1-6f-14 i'4)1 ./ DATE: &4,4„,2 ., •.4AL----- IGNATUR IREC OR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV.5/90 devrvsht • • DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEETo41/®Spao O AcIN ECF- APPLICATION NO(S).: S1;IPL;V-108-90 - ®'997 PROPONENT: Douglas Prellwitz PROJECT TITLE: Prellwltz Short Plat BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks to short plat a 115 acre parcel Into four lots. LOCATION: SEC:32 TWNSHP:24N RNG:5E NW Corner of NE 36th St&Aberdeen Ave NE TO: PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION SCHEDULED TAC DATE:: 4/26/91 ENGINEERING SECTION TRAFFIC ENG.SECTION UTILITIES ENG. SECTION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POUCE DEPARTMENT )(DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION CONSTRUCTION FIELD SERVICES DEVELOPMENT PLANNING PLANNING&TECHNICAL SERVICES PARKS AND RECREATION DIVISION OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5:00 P.M.ON APRIL 12, 1991. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: Atimagembasew 6E60512 APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS )NOT APPROVED 1\/07 (N SrM-R(3 /WOAAT f(2' i. 2. 51 TE l rim G yips"/ c t4 /:W.D if6/6/(16-& 3, c lfr ec.�at /5 MorT v'4/L-44 .�- re) S /07 c'0/14104affeN5/ 'E 5.6w ' N /914 frzifC :fiToA ( 1, 6E a /01110/00;4:b pyr_A-"5-ifaroiA) 41,0N6 11 a gi /oc,4CE, lF r 5 ae0 /s! /NT/z -z) /t/t-mt,Y 1ao�.5//L: -76 u).60/-- ©vr A 5Fert/CC Gu p lO7 414D ff&1vr6A1 7o Co1VN&C7 OW e0/S PiV 1,47E. 6 bouz D/5fio�/fL ' 45Z fig p M c/T-p coax= S- c- 3 G6/ct 0la coil /D-Ja-f�P y' .DNY 5az 1 5 5 (-6 ") /1L01vG 6 0e/gN ,1V Nfz 41v0 3c/7-75t ' ; rOat, pm7'y eNMc-ec eiIL.c_ 4F-00/"Yea 5, 5 ie w xh(gl74VA /N/' Ago O c OA/ / h Syr f0G7Iidf/4/75, I-/yo T/4� ;(..(2, o— DATE: q'/c — cr/ SIGNATURE V p 'EC OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE 6, 5 G��/T x x"N� 9 /' Fa,te--'6-A Difilte ty-rs/ / REV.5/90 devrvsht • f 'P71 a DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORI? ' ` ' 'off N oti 69� DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET 4444' 'la/ ECF- APPLICATION NO(S).: SHPL;V-108-90 PROPONENT: Douglas Prellwitz PROJECT TITLE: Prellwitz Short Plat BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks to short plat a 1.5 acre parcel Into four lots. LOCATION: SEC:32 TWNSHP:24N RNG:5E NW Corner of NE 36th St&Aberdeen Ave NE TO: PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION SCHEDULED TAC DATE: 4/26/91 ENGINEERING SECTION TRAFFIC ENG. SECTION UTILITIES ENG. SECTION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION CONSTRUCTION FIELD SERVICES DEVELOPMENT PLANNING PLANNING &TECHNICAL SERVICES PARKS AND RECREATION DIVISION OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5:00 P.M. ON APRIL 12, 1991. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: S+oh.nn i kk.r APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS )(NOT APPROVED 1. NI �/ cy cRift „Dm/ 64-s1 N ;. C l o 5 Fs r .Die/ ivA-G C/Ey/i- E ON /Q I C ot�iJ o� _p( rche n uNlVitic- c��i` i i- iG ,ESr sriDE OP aT1-1pLACl=- 3. 6cipyktr7_ p Aj / f°L1K AND ,D+ -slc_N .D/gfreA/ c-p &-CYC/ 7'ES r� itCcexwiq (Ce tthy /Ty'O ( A(c ccx. 7`jc L&,f7�� /t14 A(cA L, ct, T(T--bert-we Aocf s , 5 k) 577/(G AND //moo/Ooc_./) cQN row( //V S c 7v Fi9C-E 6F PL T 9 i o fl6 //97 /y-P (y(5O J) p s , /��. PLA S I\&a MM DO - S /a /3E 27 n3 y ) / 20 s circa DATE: t1-1° -r SI NATUR PECTOR AUTHORIZED RED NTATIVE REV.5/90 devrvsht Pit4°N DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS APR , ® 19 DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET, 91 Irk ECF- APPLICATION NO(S).: SHPL;V-108-90 PROPONENT: Douglas Prellwitz PROJECT TITLE: Prellwitz Short Plat BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks to short plat a 1.5 acre parcel into four lots. LOCATION: SEC:32 TWNSHP:24N RNG:5E NW Corner of NE 36th St&Aberdeen Ave NE TO: PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION SCHEDULED TAC DATE: 4/26/91 ENGINEERING SECTION TRAFFIC ENG. SECTION UTILITIES ENG. SECTION . FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT X DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION CONSTRUCTION FIELD SERVICES DEVELOPMENT PLANNING PLANNING&TECHNICAL SERVICES PARKS AND RECREATION DIVISION OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE'PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5:00 P.M. ON APRIL 12, 1991. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: Weer Alinncs , M1/ R t/Y ee APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS X NOT APPROVED Lockr, A fht aoN5 , kE NNFYottL`-Pit= iO 2-oNa_( 3A0 `,�a 2. Ex,',r1 Ylr' !?" 6V•47 Z,1'//Y 42-ONG A6M,,95,y i, ,ram', 3, .x t/YD 1 r/ OAT `/ '/6- FA'®' 1 /9j35/1 D,-°�/y '/9 y 1'1 - Gv 57a' o . 5 otv Lo c/I- 10-. op Ex/517,V /i 'E YY,,DG4 3, h94 c. 1QP.S�D U�� r Palil7`7(/N 3do Qeef of I;//7� / GQ �yT /1415440 / _ ,1,01Y6 144 v 1 ervT. U ""`ifirsf",-", U -r,i M F 7,4145 5, GC. 6t Gocel //Y c t Y R/a/r r of 4_,4t y O . w r fZf'i t F44,6416-N AND 1)(0 IN /0..4 fr enr 7 6, �4� rlv k 40i?6 „v 7 A (' 7 5194Cc 6E ON 22"x39 " 5ne/ 17 p l-D I44T6:/J 70 0047, /2 o NC�. 6 C 1 .=:a�0 Cttv47'a1.�L IAy, !sL/GC //�r? F Cal u v C ,Q�f'rjt,�j /��h �--� 7, `7 u'&z `T V( V /_ (iv p f44- 7/ / /�l�J) p�'0°` '/ / / 4(*/%V� / ' E I l,J/l/1'/����,f,/ it DATE: T r/0 — SIGNATURE !s %RE . !: %R AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV.5/90 devrvsht DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET' PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF RENTON ECF- APPLICATION NO(S).: SHPL;V-108-90 1991 PROPONENT: Douglas Prellwitz PROJECT TITLE: Prellwitz Short Plat BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks to short plat a 1.5 acre parcel Into four lots. LOCATION: SEC:32 TWNSHP:24N RNG:5E NW Corner of NE 36th St&Aberdeen Ave NE TO: PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION SCHEDULED TAC DATE: 4/26/91 ENGINEERING SECTION TRAFFIC ENG. SECTION UTILITIES ENG. SECTION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION CONSTRUCTION FIELD SERVICES DEVELOPMENT PLANNING PLANNING &TECHNICAL SERVICES PARKS AND RECREATION DIVISION OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5:00 P.M. ON APRIL 12, 1991. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: �a APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS OT APPROVED .. c:��� t Do w\ tan t_v\cS �C S 1 Ottet mere Je 5-•• so�-tw� o Ccee Ard ( t(o1-11"�a. �_ � 14��� � I Avg-r$ tVV� oY �:- Q(e kctJ- - CC a \rk nc CO1s►s � reheir's �tjoLe / L ot,v4 re r-k ot.tw,o or-9 ice 70?e- Cic. p .totic ae � &-Pe- r0 d sery lc a //& iq1 /// DATE: SIGNATURE OF DIRE T`R oR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV.5/90 devrvsht DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET PLANNING DIVISION Gd'i`r OF rttErT!old ECF- APPLICATION NO(S).: SHPL;V-108-90 PROPONENT: Douglas Preliwitz APR 1 6 1991 PROJECT TITLE: Prellwitz Short Plat ";LI VE® BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks to short plat a 1.5 acre parcel Into four lots. LOCATION: SEC:32 TWNSHP:24N RNG:5E NW Corner of NE 36th St&Aberdeen Ave NE TO: PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION SCHEDULED TAC DATE: 4/26/91 ENGINEERING SECTION TRAFFIC ENG. SECTION UTILITIES ENG. SECTION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION CONSTRUCTION FIELD SERVICES DEVELOPMENT PLANNING PLANNING &TECHNICAL SERVICES PARKS AND RECREATION DIVISION OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5:00 P.M. ON APRIL 12, 1991. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION:• dantog APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED e eLt3t- • 9 0- --CUL o--‘-e Q� Q c9'3�o a -- cymA --cam-- 6J\_Q_ g So f�t.rv� Q a s- DA E: ) ! SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHOR! ED REPRESENTATIVE REV.5/90 devrvsht DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS GI rYoo®BvtsioN Fle ®� DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET APR 2 2 7991 ECF- APPLICATION NO(S).: SHPL;V-1 08-90 PROPONENT: Douglas Prellwitz PROJECT TITLE: Prellwitz Short Plat BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks to short plat a 1.5 acre parcel Into four lots. LOCATION: SEC:32 TWNSHP:24N RNG:5E NW Corner of NE 36th St&Aberdeen Ave NE TO: PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION SCHEDULED TAC DATE: 4/26/91 ENGINEERING SECTION TRAFFIC ENG. SECTION UTILITIES ENG. SECTION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION CONSTRUCTION FIELD SERVICES DEVELOPMENT PLANNING PLANNING &TECHNICAL SERVICES PARKS AND RECREATION DIVISION OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5:00 P.M. ON APRIL 12, 1991. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED DATE: O6eVt SIGNATURE OF DIR OR OR tHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV.5/90 devrvsht DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS p ® a S�oNV M'pI DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET APR. 15 199/ ECF- APPLICATION NO(S).: SHPL;V-108-90 PROPONENT: Douglas Prellwitz PROJECT TITLE: Preliwitz Short Plat BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks to short plat a 1.5 acre parcel Into four lots. LOCATION: SEC:32 TWNSHP: 24N RNG:5E NW Corner of NE 36th St&Aberdeen Ave NE TO: PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION SCHEDULED TAC DATE: 4/26/91 ENGINEERING SECTION TRAFFIC ENG. SECTION UTILITIES ENG. SECTION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION CONSTRUCTION FIELD SERVICES DEVELOPMENT PLANNING PLANNING&TECHNICAL SERVICES PARKS AND RECREATION DIVISION OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE,PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5:00 P.M. ON APRIL 12, 1991. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: 1 +i� APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS y/ NOT APPROVED S e A— 'a—G h we W ` '- DATE: 4 /// /7?) SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR HORIZED REPRESENTATIVE l REV.5/90 devrvsht REVIEW COMMENTS TRANSPORTATION-DEVELOPMENT SERVICES PRELLWITZ SHORT PLAT SHPL; V108-90 • NE 36th Street and Aberdeen Ave. NE April 11, 1991 1) Private roads are not allowed unless approved by 'the Hearing Examiner. 2) The proposed private road does not align with the city's street grid plan and therefore is not recommended as proposed. Also the proposed private road makes an intersection with NE 36th Street which is not allowed per city code which refers to street intersections offsets less than 200 feet shall not be allowed (code no.9- 12-8G14). However, the westerly property line aligns with Monterey Ave.. NE street grid plan which would accommodate lots 1 and 4 access and Aberdeen Ave.NE right-of-way would accommodate lots 2 and 3 access. 3) Street improvements required to all approved roadways abutting • proposed plat is a follows: a) Curb, gutters and sidewalks per city standards. b) Street lighting. c) • Appropriate street signing. d) Roadway paving. e) Provisions for roadway storm drainage. 4) Appropriate roadway plans for all of the above is required. 5) All approved roadways and utilities to be installed before final plat is to be signed by the authorized approving authorities. 910EM054 Reviewed 10? DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF- APPLICATION NO(S).: SHPL;V-108-90 PROPONENT: Douglas Prellwitz PROJECT TITLE: Prellwitz Short Plat BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks to short plat a 1.5 acre parcel into four lots. • LOCATION: SEC:32 TWNSHP:24N RNG:5E NW Corner of NE 36th St&Aberdeen Ave NE TO: PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION SCHEDULED TAC DATE: 4/26/91 ENGINEERING SECTION TRAFFIC ENG. SECTION UTILITIES ENG. SECTION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION CONSTRUCTION FIELD SERVICES DEVELOPMENT PLANNING PLANNING&TECHNICAL SERVICES PARKS AND RECREATION DIVISION OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5:00 P.M. ON APRIL 12, 1991. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: peoper66APPROVED V APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED • Att ?al/)41/ . DATE: /qi SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPR TATIVE REV.5/90 devrvsht PROPERTY MANAGEMENT FEE REVIEW i Ur DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET in PLAN REVIEW ROUTING SLIP flY ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET C OTHER APPLICANT: G64- 1-404-c kv At.4.) JOB ADDRESS: . `3 d..,.../. `G .i NATURE OF WORK: F deO-Gi.` g, DATE RECEIVED BY RECEIVED FROM COMMENTS DUE WO# ,® . PROPER MGMT. ....45G O1V�Q e cii___ !0 17/A GREEN# :1;1: FREDL FEES APPLIED 0 NEED MORE INFORMATION CI LEGAL DESCRIPTI \ 1991 0 El NOT APPROVED FOR El FRONT FOOTAGE 0 SQUARE FOOTAGE6d' �vAPPLICATION OF FEES 0 VICINITY MAP 0 OTHER It is the intent of this development fee analysis to put the developer/owner on notice,that the fees quoted bw ll apply to the subject site upon development of the property. All quoted fees are due and payable at the time the construction permit is issued to install the on-site and off-site improvements(i.e.underground utilities,street improvements,etc.) PRIVATE DEVELOPER HELD PROJECT COST LATECOMER LATECOMER AGREEMENT NO. PER. FIG. FEE WATER SEWER O .— OTHER _O '" SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT FTG. SAD FEE WATER O SEWER G OTHER ^D SPECIAL UTILITY CONNECTION CHARGE-WATER UNITS a3' SUCC FEE Single family residential dwelling unit$940/lot x Apartment,Condo,each multiplex unit$545/ea.unit x Commercial/Industrial$.126/sq.ft.of property x (not less than$940.00) SPECIAL UTILITY CONNECTION CHARGE-SEWER UNITS SUCC FEE Single family residential dwelling unit$470/lot x L Apartment,Condo,each multiplex unit$270/ea.unit x Commercial/Industrial$.063/sq.ft.of property x (not less than$470.00) TOTAL: $ ,< 42 The above quoted fees do NOT include inspection fees,side sewer permits,/r�/w� /permit fees o�r the cost of water meters. z r+ )4(17.. tt•i— /CCO- 1,<- . i‘ritAg-t) pei,..1_‘54e4.041) Atet.o.e. it..e., ...e.itere.....h. -eke_ 44-ap-&- ll. -00 firt.A=A-e., . 5' a 4 ,14/4,,t.t 1-2-t . tivigt-t-er. 0//7,/ ?'''' Signature of Director or Authorized Representative DATE „/t.cb....,n.,../ /ism/rr 4$ 2„ CIT 'OF RENTON "LL Planning/Building/Public Works Department Earl Clymer, Mayor Lynn Guttman,Administrator April 2, 1991 Tom Touma 15668 West Valley Hwy Seattle,WA 98188 SUBJECT: Prellwitz Short Plat SHPL;V-108-90 Dear Mr.Touma: The Development Planning Section of the City of Renton has formally accepted the above-referenced application for preliminary review. It is tentatively scheduled for consideration by the Technical Advisory Committee on April 26, 1991. Following that review, you will be notified that: 1)your application is complete and has been scheduled for environmental review and determination, or 2) that additional information is required to continue processing your application for environmental review. Please contact me,at 235-2550, if you have any questions. Sincerely, 4", Mark P Project Manager cc: Douglas Prellwitz 2609NE6thPI - Renton,WA 98056 accptltr/MP/kac 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 NOTICE OF PROPOSED SHORT PLAT AND VARIANCE APPLICATION RENTON,WASHINGTON A Short Plat and Variance Application has been filed and accepted with the Development Services Division of the City of Renton. The following briefly describes the application and the necessary Public Approvals. PROJECT NAME/NUMBER: Prellwitz Short Plat SHPL;V-108-90 I DESCRIPTION: Applicant seeks to short plat a 1.5 acre parcel into four lots. GENERAL LOCATION: NW Corner of NE 36th St&Aberdeen Ave NE PUBLIC APPROVALS: Environmental Review Short Plat/Variance Approval Building Permit The application can be reviewed in the Development Services Division located on the third floor of Renton City Hall. Comments will be accepted anytime prior to Public Hearings, during Public Hearings, or prior to 'an administrative site plan approval. For further information on the application, or if you wish to be made a PARTY OF RECORD and receive additional notifications, by mail, of the City's environmental determinations, appeal periods and/or the public hearing date(s) for this project, please contact the Development Services Division at 235-2550. Please include the project NUMBER when calling for proper file identification. 'I -_-- . -----__ PREL L Wl TZ SHORT PLA T�.I I SW 1/4 OF THE NE 1/4 OF SECTION 32, TOWNSHIP 24 NORTH, 1=1 RANGE 5 EAST, W.M.; CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ' 1'1=40' . GRAPHIC SCALE I, (1N FEET) 1 inch= 40 It I ' 1 BASIS OF BEARING=KCAS GA7UM I I ' 1 i I N 88'09 29'W I I 147.25' 298.51' 151.25' ----71 ' -I- I I -o .3 LOT 4 ,;7n N JB n I w >�a ��o LOT 3 I Cn O N_ I al Li j J N W a m N "I I N ;n W h I� WI q 9 NJ 1 h, 35.00' 35.00' m I I I op N88;jb26•w oo 112.25' 2 0 4.95' 5.05' N 2 I 117.21 N 8830'26'W 116.34' , N 8830'26"W 121.39' W Q. 1 O h A=9070'20" o O A= 8949'40" : I?,Ai () R= 75.00' N R= 15.00' R T= 75.05' N N Q 'O T= 14.96' o Lu p, L=23.67' vi O to L =23.52' �I Q JI ^ LOT 1 2 ct- Z oc 1 N 7i.V aeq..L W W W LOT 2 g t1 v q �v ea �UIaQ'0 0= 893I'19"I h • I - g -.. T=24.79 SW CORNER 2 0 L =39.06' I q OF LOT 9, BLK4 �� 3 6 3,00' I 30I N 883122'W 273.90' ' JO' 30'655.11' N 883122'W `I , - 14726' ��� - - �1 1310.22' 30' 181.19' _ - - NE 36TH STREET 30' EAST 1/4 CORNER OF . SECTION 32-24-5 I . genmalot - OF RE •�� • • 3°`) ° NOTICE • 094 7.6-0 SEP'(E�'0P • OF PENDING • APPLICATION . • DESCRIPTION : . • PRELLWITZ SHORT PLAT • SHPL;V-108-90 APPLICANT SEEKS TO SHORT PLAT A 1.5 ACRE PARCEL INTO FOUR LOTS. • • GENERAL LOCATION AND/OR ADDRESS: NW CORNER OF NE 36TH ST&ABERDEEN AVE NE • PUBLIC APPROVALS REQUIRED : • ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW SHORT PLAT/VARIANCE APPROVAL • BUILDING PERMIT • PUBLIC COMMENTS WILL BE RECEIVED BY THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT .ANYTIME PRIOR TO PUBLIC HEARINGS • AND DURING PUBLIC HEARINGS. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CALL THE CITY 'OF RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT 235-2550 • THIS NOTICE NOT TO BE REMOVED - • WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION CERTIFICATION I , j`'�ar�� Su�V�Ia , HEREBY CERTIFY THAT 3 COPIES OF - THE ABOVE DOCUMENT WERE POSTED BY ME IN 3 CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON OR. NEARBY THE DESCRIBED PROPERTY' ON ' 4--5- 9 • • \1+�''' •Lti r'"`'AVEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a . . fi ,'; Notary Public, in and for the State of Washington • 4' re i ding in 'K , on the Ste- SIGNED `777 rvu� ,Ja ve-et, • d. f OF RFC NciTicE U Q% Q Z 9$��TFO SfPt EM'9�P6 OF PENDING =MEE APPLICATION DESCRIPTION : PRELLWITZ SHORT PLAT SHPL;V-108-90 APPLICANT SEEKS TO SHORT PLAT A 1.5 ACRE PARCEL INTO FOUR LOTS. GENERAL LOCATION AND/OR ADDRESS: NW CORNER OF NE 36TH ST &ABERDEEN AVE NE PUBLIC APPROVALS REQUIRED : ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW SHORT PLAT/VARIANCE APPROVAL BUILDING PERMIT PUBLIC COMMENTS WILL BE RECEIVED BY THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT ANYTIME PRIOR TO PUBLIC HEARINGS AND DURING PUBLIC HEARINGS. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CALL THE CITY OF RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT 235-2550 THIS NOTICE NOT TO BE REMOVED WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION CIT", !OF RENTON Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Earl Clymer, Mayor Lynn Guttmann, Administrator January 29, 1990 • Mr.Tom Touma Touma Engineers 15668 West Valley Highway Seattle,WA 98188 SUBJECT: Prellwitz Short Plat SHPL-10&90 Dear Mr.Touma: In response to your letter,dated January 23, 1991, I have discussed the amended short plat with Don Erickson,Zoning Administrator. He has feels that the amended short plat is acceptable for review by City staff. This is not meant to imply that the short plat will be approved, only that the lot layout is acceptable to be reviewed to ensure that the short plat meets all City standards and requirements. I have also taken the opportunity to discuss the short plat, in general terms only, with the Transportation Systems Division. At the time that the short plat is transmitted to them for comments they will need to determine whether a 30 foot road right-of-way will be required along the western edge of the short plat. You will need to submit a vicinity map that shows the roads to around the subject site with distances from the edge of the subject property to the roadway in order for them to complete their review the short plat. You may also take the opportunity to indicate, in writing,why you feel a road along the western boundary of the subject property will be unnecessary now and in the future or impossible to construct. As I stated in our meeting,a variance application will need to be submitted for the proposed private street. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact me at 235-2550.. Sincerely, Mark R. P ell,AICP Project Manager • • • TOUMALTR 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 TOUMA ENGINEERS • January 23, 1991 PLANNING DIVISION Mr. Mark R. Pywell, AICP CUY oF frEaroy.1 Department of Planning JAN City of Renton 2 5 1991 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 ;' RE: PRELLWITZ SHORT PLAT - SHPL-108-90 Dear Mr. Pywell: Pursuant to our recent meeting with respect to the four-lot layout proposed for the above referenced short plat, we have revised the layout making the corner lot wider than the interior lots. We are enclosing for your review an approval of a revised short plat conforming to what we had discussed and the City's subdivision ordinance. Should you desire additional information regarding this submittal, please feel to call me. /Sincerely - / Mounir "TOM" Touma, P.E. Project Engineer Enclosures cc: Mr. Doug Prellwitz w/enclosures 15668 West Valley Highway • Seattle, Washington 98188 Phone: (206) 255-4100 • Fax: (206) 255-0945 4$ + e, CITE OF RENTON wirma"LL Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Earl Clymer, Mayor Lynn Guttmann, Administrator December 3, 1990 Tom Touma ' Touma Engineers 15668 West Valley Highway Seattle,WA 98188 SUBJECT: Prellwitz Short Plat SHPL-108-90 Dear Mr.Touma: Staff has completed an initial review of the proposed short plat listed above. The following items need to be corrected or submitted before the short plat can be accepted for further review by the City. 1. In accordance with Section 9-12-8.X.1.h. of the City of Renton Municipal Code a variance must be submitted for the proposed private street. A copy of a variance application .is attached for your use. Please note that only items 2 and 7 need to be completed as the rest of the items were submitted with the short plat application. 2. In accordance with Section 9-12-8.X.6.d. of the Municipal Code corner lots must be platted wider than interior lots.. Lot 2 is as shown is not in conformance with the Subdivision Ordinance as it is platted the same width as the interior lots. The short plat will have to be revised to show the corner • lot platted wider than the interior lots or a separate variance would need to be filled. No further review of the application can occur until the requested revisions are completed. As soon as 12 copies of the revised short plat and variance application are submitted, staff will be able to continue its review of the application. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact me at 235-2550. Sincerely, • 97,/,t1/0 Mark R. Pywel, AICP Project Manager • Prellwit 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 sf)CAri©N Foe Vectp ATTACHMENT "A" a. We request variance from the City Code 9-12-8.x.h. . The variance is requested to allow construction of a private street serving four single family lots. The proposed private street will not be required for future traffic and/or pedestrian circulations to serve adjacent properties. The access to the proposed subdivision is via NE 36th Street along the south and Lincoln Avenue NE approximately 300 feet west of the subject property. There exists 112th Avenue SE (King County Street) within 100 feet of the property. b. Granting the variance would allow development of fairly large single family lots and we do feel that this development will not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to adjacent properties. c. Granting the variance should not provide special privileges for this development. The private street is design to comply with Section 9-12-8.x.h. as it relates to the easement width and pavement width. The proposed private street does not exceed the 150 feet in length which is required by the Fire Prevention Department. d. Approval of this variance minimal variance. The private street would provide adequate access to the proposed four lot subdivision. The street will be all weather surface roadway measured at a length of less than 150 feet. :::v::..,:i:>:::i::i :i:%r}«Y 1:;::•:::::}i?ij} i:•: i::i : ::>::>�::: ........;QW;::::...R::.:::::::.::::.;::::;::.>:•::.::.:.:'.::.::: •<.:: :TYPE::OFAPPLI�AT'1:QN� $� FEES NAME: Douglas Prellwitz _•REZ.ONE $ • _SPECIAL PERMIT $ _TEMPORARY PERMIT $ ADDRESS: 2609 NE 6th Place *CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT $ • _SITE PLAN APPROVAL $ • SPECIAL PERMIT $ CITY: Renton zip: 98056 GRADE&FILL PERMIT $ CU.YDS: • 'VARIANCE pr II ruc••3free& $ 90.0C2 TELEPHONE NUMBER 235,7.164 . • (FROM SECTION: °l-I,.- ) _'WAIVER $ • • ROUTINE VEGETATION • MANAGEMENTPERMIT $ NAME: Tom Touma <. : > (•JUSTIFICATION REQUIRED) ,.. 42IL. ADDRESS: 15668 West Valley Highway • SUBDIVISION: $ _LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT $ CITY: Seattle ZIP: 98188 SHORTPLAT $ 4C7eo _TENTATIVE PLAT $ _PRELIMINARY PLAT $ TELEPHONE NUMBER 255-4100 _FINAL PLAT $ NO.OF LOTS: PLAT NAME : --t. (m...)!Ta. Ske PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAME: PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: $ `/ PRELLWITZ, SHORT PLAT 4 _PRELIMINARY V i P c r0g. PRtVA're FINAL PROPERTY/PROJECT ADDRESS(S)/LOCATION: NE 36th St. & Aberdeen Ave NE Renton, Washington • _BINDINGSITEPLAN: $ KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER(S): • MOBILE HOME PARKS: $ 334570.,0210 . _TENTATIVE EXISTING LAND USE(S): • PRELIMINARY Vacant _FINAL PARK NAME: EXISTING ZONING: NO.OF SPACES: ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW $ PROPOSED LAND USE(S): PROJECT VALUE: $ Single Family SENSITIVEAREA: APA: _1 _2 _OTHER _N/A SEWER MORATORIUM AREA: YES _NO ' PROPOSED ZONING: R1 TOTAL FEES: $ SITE AREA(SQ.FT.OR ACREAGE): DATE PAID: c'/7 /CO 1;5 re.S' POSTAGE PR, DED: NO I ANNING DIVI• CfTY OF RENTON • ......................................................................................................................................... . . .......... <s:Thi&:aeckion'kb::b�>c m 1 ed:: : : .:. c ff�::::::.>::::>:::::::;: ;::::::;.:'::<:>:.:<:::::::::::;:'::;:::::::•::::<.:�;:<:.:: ::::::::::;:;::;•.:•'. .......... . :.::,.::':..:::::•.:::.•.,...,'.::•,..:::,::•:..::. ;:::.Clt :.file• .um e�. :.....:;. ;:�::::;;::.;.::.�.;:..................:...:.. ..:.:<•. �� ....5........ ....5 CU....LLA.. PP-....:: .: .;�:<> .>�:: :>�5::>�:::::.>::;;:;:::':`•::::;:;:;.;:.•._:s::»::»:�>:;:: �::�::::::.:::::s:>_>s»�:»>»:z:;.:..:.:.:.::;..... .. ..::: • : .. .::: >: :.> : ..... . . ..LEG ► : DE$.CRIPT'IONV::O.F P:ROPERTY: .:.::::; • .• . :.: .:.:::.:::: :..::. ::; :;:; ::; : ii:« ;::.::: ..i i tf moare::s 4..:.: S;re uired .i.lease;at 4.0..: t: e arate• he . >: ••:: LOT 9, BLOCK 4, HILLMAN'S C.D„ LAKE WASHINGTON GARDEN OF EDEN, • • • • • f >AFFIDAV: >: :< : < > < ` ::•:< ::. ::•. ••::.•::: ; ::IT I, Oz%,..1 4.s, kae to // - , being duly sworn, declare that I am (please check one) the authorized representtiv6 to act for the property owner, the owner of the property involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of m}�knowledge and belief. SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS DAY OF /.'. 19gp .•..e%0 WA.•ro&,, . 0%e+W 4 i NOTA r Y PUBLIC IN HE STATE c,� pp7ARY WASH 1 P, '%► RESIDING AT: A / •• / T. • ,.L• 9 Mount.-. ff, Varna .,'',��rFoF%NAst .• �� ''////111111111111,` 6:;?e"}(x_z_,L_z:lc:::::r : %eo,_762_ (Name of otary Public) (Signature Owner) 15668 West Valley Highway 0 7 /v� 744 ,/ (Address) (Address) ,,Seattle, WA 98.188 • A e,z 71cD Ld 7 dos (City/State/Zip) • • (City/State/Zip) 255.4.100 23.s" - 7/ c/ (Telephone) (Telephone) . Acceptance of this application and required filing fee does not constitute a complete application. Plans and other material required to constitute a complete application are listed in the"Application Procedure." • RtnMastr 12./90 e r ) . . Policy No. : 9941-517535 A.L.T.A. OWNER' S POLICY PLANNING DIVISION CITY of tomiTroN SCHEDULE B Page 2 SEP 0 9 1990 ififEcCO SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS: t,inftEt 1. RESTRICTIONS CONTAINED IN INSTRUMENT: RECORDED: September 25, 1914 RECORDING NUMBER: 955076 AS FOLLOWS: No shacks allowed on the main streets 2 . DEED OF TRUST TO SECURE AN INDEBTEDNESS: GRANTOR: Douglas Prellwitz and Beverly L. Prellwitz, husband and wife TRUSTEE: Stewart Title Company of Washington, Inc. , a corporation BENEFICIARY: Murray Anagnost and Marijean Anagnost, who acquired title as r Marijean Kewley, husband and wife AMOUNT: $48,000.00 DATED: December 29, 1989 RECORDED: December 21, 1989 RECORDING NUMBER: 8912210738 END OF SCHEDULE B • RL/cw/4636o Standard Coverage STEWART TITLE GUARANTY COMPANY A.L.T.A. OWNER' S POLICY • SCHEDULE B . Policy No. : 9941-51753! • This policy does not insure against loss or damage by reason of the following: GENERAL EXCEPTIONS: 1. Rights or claims of parties in possession not shown by the public records. • 2 . Easements, or claims of easements, not shown by the public record. 3 . Encroachments, overlaps, boundary line disputes, or other matters which would be disclosed by an accurate survey or inspection of the premises. • • 4. Any lien, or right to a lien, for services, labor or material heretofore or hereafter furnished, imposed by law and not shown by • the public records, or liens under the Workmen' s Compensation Act not shown by the public records. 5. Any title or rights asserted by anyone including but not limited to persons corporations, governments or other entities, to tide lands, or lands comprising the shores or bottoms of navigable rivers, • lakes, bays, ocean or sound, or lands beyond the line of the harbor lines as established or changed by the United States Government. • 6. (a) Unpatented mining claims; (b) reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; (c) water rights, claims or title to water. • • 7. Taxes or special assessments which are not shown as existing liens by. the public records. • 8. Any service, installation, connection, maintenance or construction charges for sewer, water, electricity or garbage removal. SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS: • As on Schedule B, attached. • • (continued) Standard Coverage STEWART TITLE GUARANTY COMPANY A.L.T.A. OWNER' S POLICY SCHEDULE A Order No. : 104493 Policy No. : 9931-517535 Policy Date: December 21, 1989 Policy Amount: $60, 000.00 at 11:31 a.m. 1. Name of Insured: DOUGLAS PRELLWITZ and BEVERLY L. PRELLWITZ, husband and wife 2 . The estate or interest in the land described herein and which is covered by this Policy is: FEE SIMPLE 3 . The estate or interest referred to herein is at date of Policy vested in: DOUGLAS PRELLWITZ and BEVERLY L. PRELLWITZ, husband and wife • 4. The land referred to in this Policy is described as follows: Lot 9, Block 4, Hillman' s C.D. , Lake Washington Garden of Eden, Division No. 7, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 16 of Plats, page 18, in King County, Washington. • • . > ' " <.>; STEWART TITLE COMPANY - : .:::.::::: of Washington, Inc., . , ORDER NO. 104411 3 IMPORTANT:This is not a Plat of Survey. It is furnished as a convenience to locate th hereon with reference to streets and other land. No liability is assumed by reason of PDI , •0_ • - - - _ fit ...... . —17-4r....--/e-- � , --- . — ..-L a • O�')r 3 �f �� �� ` i . . ;A .„.,.. . . dPi if , ,.. . ,., • . , ... . .�yr . s+t/iif .. -- I emir es K .Yyr� V i C ;emu W alc ero _ - i ; t il I * • o i Z� 2 : s `\/ 7 f . - IS4 '; • I il •.:.N f•.�•� �8 ti Q� se eeTx sT re u .... ,,.. C ) &galWes, .. - IQ • . • / ; • • ir_•.sr, " . Ov ...- .. .. I 2 , wfA pm 13 gag r—....„0.-„,,•• Z i 4 O I b .. .... ��� Z /7 i Z N j — .J AIM is Ogg• —ro ••.... ti I ..s• 1 e .,,,... OdP ‘.., 0,4. .1 a j 4.7.: [ 10. eft ROA a 4 • sc. aliment. ". - - _.,. 110411P-sersmraster Ijil I I __.,_ . , VICINITY mAr) ..,_ ., , . - . . . . . . ... k. 116 , 1 „„k., , ,45., ___ . , ... , .. iii /., A I 11 I ellTE' SCALE 1" = 200` n . \13 4 1=4, (r/ i L. ______, , , . , , . 1 r ----i , , , 1 •►1va`Jm--/a.,, i1 1 . r ��l\5\ 1Q\A,�a g% tj !k' k 0,43-vo - „Ay- ,.._ .. -, ....„ ., _____ __ I° .7� i �s- s1IJ FAN/Gy asp ,, I 1 _ ::: CI ,:::,O :::: ENT:. < ;::::':>> ? > > DESPNIEN:'I!;::.g.P.P.X CJ !.:Y::: : : . .:;.; •!1: .4 >< s >` ' < ....-: ::: : ::: :> :::...................... ........................�.::::.. ::.:..:...:N _Y::.D V_____ANT:.. :::::::::::::. ::: ::::::::::::::.::. »::',i.: , : : :::s:: :>::.:: :: .::>::»: : >. ' :.. ..0 RT F. . AT . .. .. . . ><> OFNOT:IF:.IC3AT OeNOFP-.: R :.>P.::. ERTeYc. .:t...::..W::.s.iN•ER . > : >: :; . . :i i : : .:m:: : mi.. :within :0:0 :ft:>:ofhes. . te : ::;: :::> :: > :::: ::> ::::pp ***FOR OFFICIALcAL-} USE ONLY*** PROJECT TITLE: R e I 1 W .�Ibir- ` t prila 1 e V'r ice APPLICANT:Torn—11;uarzt. APPLICATION NUMBER: lS ftP I — )018•°i0 The following is a list of .property owners within 300 feet of the subject site. The Community Development Department will notify these individuals of the proposed development. NAME ADDRESS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER WAYNE R. RATTRAY 8730 112TH PL. SE RENTON WA 98055 322405-9011 WAYNE R. RATTRAY 8730 112TH PL SE RENTON WA 98055 322405-9072 CHAS & MARY KOMODORE 8625 116TH AVE. SE RENTON WA 98056 322405-9013 MRS ELLEW HICKOK 333 1/2 RENTON AVE S RENTON WA 98055 ,3.345.1.0.-0041 HENRY G. HEALY 441 WARNER HALL PL NEWPORT NEWS VA 23602 ,'i334570,7�`0217 STANLEY CELIGOY 18100 107 PL SE #42 RENTON .. „ :WA 98055 ';`'3345;7,0-;0;2,T5. JEANETTE SANDHEI 8612 110TTH AVE. SE RENTON , '. :. WA 98056 ,334570`-Or2d0:;, KENNETH & C TAYLOR 8611 110TH PL SE RENTON WA 98056 ` - 334570-0..O5 K..SWANSON & E. JACK 1909 NE 36TH ST. RENTON • WA -98056 334210-3530 • FRANK J. CHOSZEWSKI 1011 S 10TH AVE YAKIMA WA 98902 334210-3532 RONALD G. DOHRN 8467 110TH PL SE RENTON WA 98056 334570-0182 GARY & MAXINE TRUS 8442 10TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98056 334570-0185 GEORGE DOHRN 8467 110TH PL SE RENTON ' WA 98056 '`'•33.4'5..70=O181 DANIEL 0. KELLOGG 8830 112TH SE RENTON WA 98055 • .334510-0040 DONALD & S. GEREND 16301 NE 8TH #231 - BELLEVUE WA. 98008 334210-3531 UNITED HOMES CORP. 1800 NE 44TH #235 - , RENTON WA 98056 334570-0216 SEP 0 9 1990 • ' J NAME ADDRESS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER • • • CERTIFICATION I, Robert G. Anderson , hereby certify that the above list(s) of adjacent property owners and their addresses were taken from the records of the King County Assessor as prescribed by law. A.;;N 53",:o Subscribed and sworn to before - - $ T .1%7TöPublic. in ande State of '" fet iding at ,� 4.41)..40.4 e /9 day of / d • Signed: • C;_ wAS CERTIFICATION FOR MAILING ''eau, un•••`•0 I, , k, Augee , hereby certify that notices of the public meeting on the subject site plan aploroval were mailed one I9 , , to each listed adjacent property owner asprescribed bylaw. p p Y ottoluDillees ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to befc, ®OPBETJ AGO°°°° me, a Notary Public, in a d for the Stat��o •�s oN •., ° Washington", residing at ,c° NorARY 9N• 9 on the day of %NA' PUBLIC a Rev 10 9 °.o°° OF ,,,, a ens CERTNOT2.doc ti0'B110 PLANNING s romImo FEES NAME: pRozEcz; a. Annexation Fees 000/000/345'8I'00'02 Appeals & Waivers 000/000/345'81'00'03 Binding Site Plan/Short Plat .00O 000/345'Ol'U0'O4 oomprebenaive Plan Amendment 000/800/345'8I'00'05 Conditional Use Fees 000/000/345'8I'00'06 Environmental Review Fees 000/000/345'81'00'07 ^ Preliminary Plat 000/000/345'81'00'08 50% Final Plat (General Fund) 000/000/345'81'00'09 50u Final Plat (Park roud) 101/000/3.4s'8I'00'00 Final/Preliminary goo 000/000/345'81.010,I0 Grading m Filling Fees 000/000/345'81'00'I1 Lot Line Adjustment 000/000/345'81'00'I2 Mobile Home Parks 000/000/345'8I'00'I3 Rezone 000/000/345,81,00'I4 Routine Vegetation Mgm± reao 000/000/345'8I'00'I5 Shoreline Substantial Dev reao 000/000/345'8I'00'I6 Site Plan Approval 000/000/345.8I'00'17 Special/Temporary Review Fees 000/000/345'8I'00'18 Variance Fees 000/000/345'8I'00'19 other Miao Planning/Zoning raea 000/0.00/345'81'00'20 Maps 000/000/341,50'00'00 7041 Photo Copies 000/000/34I'80'00'24 Publications 000/000/34I' 60'00'24 /~~ Postage 000/000/05/5I9/90'42'01 7Os5�� �7�, Sales Tao 000/000/231.70,00,00 9998 BY: ^3- / /l DATE: ~�/ /7/ 7 �� ' � , �� ~_ _~ ` \ . '.� ' ' ====================================== CITY OF KENTON CITY TREASURER REG/RCPT : 02-10783 1319-07-1990 CASHIER ID : A 1:29 om ====================================== 8000 MISCELLAN[OUSRE $400.00 BINDING SITE PLAN/SHORT PLAT 000.000.00.345.81.�0,000004 7055 POSTAGE $3,75 000.000.05.519.90.42.000001 TOTAL DUE $403.75 RECEIVED FROM: DOUG PRELLWITZ CHECK $403.75 ------------- TOTAL TENDERED $403.75 CHANGE DUE DUE $0.00 ====================================== ' ' PLANNING & ZONING FEES CITY OF RENTON Oat. ' WitirCR/1' -; CITY TREASURER EG/RCPT 4HI : 02 , _ C a ode>:::> �. 1 _ •;>::.:;:<.;;:.;:.;: ,; .. . ...: ;::»::»::::>::>:::::<:::>:<:>>::»»::>::>::::>::>::>:<:>:>:»Amount«>::;:::><:::><:::::<::<::�::>T.r. nc. . . ...... ., .1s3 03 i?., �.;.;;:.;::::;:::>Rev..;e.n.u�.::.:Acc.pun,t.:::: ::.::::::::.::::.::.::.::.:::::.:::.;:.; :::;:.::::::.:::.;;:..::::::::::::.::::�::::::: :::.:::::::::::: 5 . 1991 E ... 1_.. 5 7 a M 000/000/345.81.00.02 :100 MISCELLANEOUS RE $300.00 aRTANC:E FEES000/000/345.81.00.03 0.000.00,345.81.0i_i•Cs00019 ,000/000/345.81.00.04 TOTAL: DUE 3i1iry•i_i�i :CEDED FROFROM: 000/000/345.81.00.05 OUGLAS PRELWITZ ECK 000/000/345.81.00.06 TOTAL TENDERED 000/000/345.81.00.07 • $300.00 CHANGE DUE 000/000/345.81.00.08 $0.00 000/000/345.81.00.09 101/000/345.81.00.00 000/000/345.81.00.10 Grading & Filling Fees 000/000/345.81.00.11 Lot Line Adjustment 000/000/345.81.00.12 Mobile Home Parks 000/000/345.81.00. 13 Rezone 000/000/345.81.00.14 Routine Vegetation Mgmt Fees 000/000/345.81.00.15 Shoreline Substantial Dev Fees 000/000/345.81.00. 16 Site Plan Approval 000/000/345.81.00. 17 Special/Temporary Review Fees 000/000/345.81.00.18 Variance Fees 000/000/345.81.00.19 Other Misc Planning/Zoning Fees 000/000/345.81.00.20 % 3 • Maps 000/000/341.50.00.00 7041 Photo Copies 000/000/341. 60.00.24 Publications 000/000/341. 60.00.24 Postage 000/000/05/519/90.42.01 7055 Sales Tax 000/000/231.70.00.00 9998 >'T.OtAI >' ':<'>`><:< } »» : y > > > :<'»ss« » » ><><> BY: . DATE: ei'/ //9lj 1 I IT `\'\ I I ..., ' ! f1 p TT . . ‘,:c7,40„ ..... 1- '', c• ' --Th IIIE * *\4' f VICINITY MAP,,,,b I I ell T SCALE 1" = 200 r/ . 144, i i E;), ,f. y: .....\. " 4*. , L _ ___, „ l',.....cs , r- ----, , „ . 1 , i tl . , , , .___.„ , °s1"— \ _i , I „ ,,,,. . . a_ __, ,-- & -,._-ix-:- ,,,_ , _ _ 1 . NIP, '; T.' /?7 - -!i•:c IV kl I ro I ,f _ V.. I 08 •••10 1 *6 ,,,, t k oecog ---- 0 , .kJ 0- ,0 \ . :-.- Q I 1 sV ®fed *� 1 Zo N4 OF sire' I ` �m a SuovND/NE7 I FR P71705-- SINCaLe FAflfl y F1poirff +L 11 11 11 A EHIBI --- �, 2 ITEM NO. RE-C /i/ co 5, 1991 CITY OF RENTON SHE OI�' '�N Hpl 20EARING EAXAMINER VE RE: SHORTPLATS NG FX4M/NEQN RENTON, WA. 98055 RE: PRELLWITZ SHORTPLAT; SHPL—V-108-90 I AM WRITING IN REGARDS TO THE HEARING REVIEW OF THE PRELLWITZ SHORTPLAT SCHEDULED FOR SEPTEMBER 10, 1991. I WOULD ALSO LIKE TO SPEAK AT THE HEARING. I CURRENTLY RESIDE AT 10904 SE. 66TH ST. RENTON, WA. 98056 AND HAVE BEEN A RENTON AREA RESIDENT FOR OVER 18 YEARS. MY HOME IS LOCATED IN THE PROPOSED ANNEXATION AREA IN HAZELWOOD WHICH IS WITHIN THE SPHERE OF INFLUENCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON. I AM STRONGLY IN FAVOR OF MR. DOUGLAS PRELLWITZ 'S FOUR LOT SHORTPLAT AS IT IS PROPOSED. THE SHORTPLAT HAS BEEN WELL DESIGNED AND THOUGHTFULLY PLANNED AND WOULD BE A VERY NICE ADDITION TO ITS PLEASANT RURAL SURROUNDINGS. THE PROPOSED SHORTPLAT IS FOUR LOTS ON A SMALL CUL—DE—SAC FRONTING ON NE. 36TH STREET; A PAVED TWO LANE ROAD. THE PROPOSED CUL—DE—SAC WOULD PROVIDE A SAFE, LEVEL, INGRESS AND EGRESS TO THE FOUR LOTS FROM NE. 36TH AND GIVE EXCELLENT ACCESS TO POLICE, FIRE AND MEDICAL SERVICES. IT WOULD ALSO PROVIDE THE BEST SIGHT VIEW DISTANCES FOR THE LIMITED TRAFFIC ON NE. 36TH. THE PRO— POSED CUL—DE—SAC OFF OF NE. 36TH WOULD ALSO BE THE MOST LOGICAL LOCATION FOR FUTURE IMPROVEMENTS SUCH AS SEWER, CABLE TELEVISION, ETC. THE PROPOSED LOTS, FRONTING ON NE. 36 ARE OF SUFFICIENT SIZE TO ACCOMMODATE ANY STYLE OF HOME AND WOULD BE A QUALITY IMPROVEMENT OF THE PROPERTY. AS AN ACTIVE REAL ESTATE AGENT, I AM ACUTELY AWARE OF THE NEED FOR AFFORDABLY PRICED BUILDING LOTS IN THE RENTON/HAZELWOOD AREA. AS A RESIDENT AND LOCAL BUSINESS PERSON, I STRONGLY SUPPORT MR. PRELLWITZ 'S REQUEST FOR THE AFOREMENTIONED SHORTPLAT. R PECTFULsLY SUBMITTED, DAVE GI LOF 10904 SE. 66 RENTON, WA. 98056 (206) 255-3633 L - r [Tr,' 0 / CITY OF RENTON ' MEMORANDUM DATE: October 8, 1991 TO: Fred J. Kaufman, Hearing Examiner FROM: Donald K. Erickson,AICP Zoning Administrator STAFF CONTACT: Mark Pywell,AICP Project Manager SUBJECT: Prellwitz Short Plat This memorandum is submitted in response to your request for additional discussion of the staff proposed amendments to the short plat. The concerns raised at the public hearing included'the location of the proposed access road, size of the lots, location of the area to be dedicated for public roads and the location of the building pads. Staff has recommended that the proposed access road be located off of Aberdeen Ave. on the east side of the subject property as indicated on the attached Exhibit A. The concern staff has with the applicant's proposal (Exhibit B) is that there would not be sufficient separating between the intersection of NE 36th Street/Aberdeen Ave. and the private access road. The Transportation Systems Division requires a minimum of 200 feet between intersections (Municipal Code Section (9-12-8.G.14). Although there would not be 200 between the staff proposed location of the private access road and the 36th St./Aberdeen Ave. intersection, staff feels that there would be less conflicts with the traffic patterns and turning movements of vehicles as Aberdeen would be a cul-de-sac on the north side of 36th Street. The applicant's engineer has stated that the existing slopes in the location of Aberdeen Ave. north of 36th Street are too great for Aberdeen Ave. to be constructed. The plans submitted by the applicant show a 12.5% slope down the length of the proposed road with approximately 10% cross slope. The plan submitted shows a 26.6% slope but it appears that the greater slope does not start until after the east side of the right-of-way for Aberdeen Ave. After reviewing the materials submitted by the applicant's engineer, the Transportation Systems Division staff still feel that it would be possible to construct Aberdeen Ave. along the east side of the subject property. The American Association of State and Highway Transportation Officials (ASHTO) manual recommends a minimum sight distance of 150 feet. Due to the slope of the terrain in this area, staff's proposed access to the short plat would provide approximately 130 feet of sight distance from the intersection of Aberdeen/36th Street and the intersection of 36th Street and 112th Street. However, the proposed intersection of Aberdeen Ave. and 36th Street would be located at the top of a ridge which would give motorist the maximum ability to spot oncoming traffic. The applicants proposed access, which is located at the bottom of a draw would not allow motorist to see oncoming traffic until it was less than 100 feet away. A City staff generated short plat has been prepared to demonstrate the approximate location of the road right-of-ways,dedications, private road, and the building pads. hexmemo The lot sizes for the short plat are as follows: Lot# Applicant's Proposal Staff's Proposal 1 15,914 square feet 16,335 square feet 2 16,146 square feet 17,400 square feet 3 17,417 square feet 15,500 square feet 4 17,067 square feet 17,450 square feet In the initial review of the short plat, Transportation Systems Division staff stated that the applicant would need to provide right-of-way dedication and half-width improvements on the west side of the proposed short plat for Monterey Ave. and on the east side for Aberdeen Ave. In working with the applicant the Transportation Systems Division determined that Monterey Ave. would not be required for this project and that Aberdeen Ave. could be terminated at the location of the staff proposed private access road. The total length of Aberdeen Ave. (north of 36th Street) and the private road would be approximately 255 feet. Aberdeen Ave. was chosen as the access point over Monterey Ave. because a'half-width dedication had already been obtained. As indicated on the short plat, NE 36th Street is proposed to be developed with a 60 foot wide right-of-way. It would become the local collector street for this area. Intersections would need to be located a minimum of 200 feet apart in order to allow for sufficient sight distance and turning movements between the intersections along NE 36th Street. The City staff proposed short plat has been reviewed by the Fire Prevention Bureau staff. The staff proposed plan would meet Fire Prevention Bureau requirements as long as Aberdeen Ave. was a City street and a cul-de-sac was provided. Fire Prevention Bureau staff would then measure the length of the proposed private access road from the edge of the City owned right-of-way. As long as the private access road from that point was less then 150 feet,the applicant would not have to provide a hammerhead or cul- de-sac that meet Fire Department standards. The hammerhead indicated on both of the proposals would not meet Fire Prevention Bureau standards if the private access road was extended beyond the 150 foot limit established by City Code. Staff would also like to note that the owner of the property on the east side of the proposed extension of Aberdeen Ave. has contacted the City in regards to the subdivision of his property. The owner has tentatively stated that he would be willing to participate in the cost of the improvements to this road. RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff recommend that the Hearing Examiner approve the proposed Prellwitz short plat (ShPI-108- 90)with the following conditions: 1. The owner shall provide evidence of King County Health Department approval for the use of septic systems and drainfields for Lot #1, Lot #2, Lot #3, and Lot #4 prior to the issuance of site preparation permits. Note: 1.a: Septic systems may be permitted as no connection to sewer lines is feasible at this time. In the event that connection to a King County or City of Renton sanitary sewer system does become feasible at a future date, the owner(s), will be called upon to make that connection. The applicant shall provide the City with a covenant on each of the proposed lots that requires the land owner to connect with a City or County sewer system within 12 months of such a sanitary sewer system becoming available within 500 feet of any proposed property line. The covenant shall be noted on the face of the plat and recorded with the title report for the subject properties. hexmemo Note: 1.b: Dry line sewers shall be installed for each of the proposed lots to facilitate the connection into a sanitary sewer system at the time the sewer system becomes available. 2. The owner shall provide a description of the extent to which existing trees and plants on proposed Lot #1, Lot #2, Lot #3 and Lot #4 will be removed or disturbed by the proposed short plat. This inventory/plan shall be provided to the satisfaction of the Development Planning Section prior to the public hearing for the short subdivision. A note shall be recorded on face of the plat indicating that existing trees shall be retained in accordance with the approved tree retention plan. 3. The applicant is encouraged to meet with the Community Services Department to discuss this project's impacts on the City's recreational facilities and proposed Master Trails Plan. The applicant is encouraged to make a voluntary contribution of$600.00 ($150 x 4 lots)to the Parks Department to mitigate the impacts of this project on area recreation facilities. 4. The applicant shall, in order to address City policy/regulations and mitigate traffic impacts, amend the short plat so that the proposed private road has its access from Aberdeen Ave. NE. An agreement shall be recorded on the face of the plat and recorded with the title report limiting access to Lots 1 and 2 to the private road and not from NE 36th Street. 5. The applicant shall, in order to mitigate the adverse impacts of construction, provide a temporary erosion control plan and a construction management plan to the satisfaction of the Department of Planning/Building/Public Works. Note: 5.a The applicant shall provide all required improvements (e.g. utility connections, road improvements) in accordance with the City of Renton Municipal Code. 6. The applicant shall, in order to mitigate potential impacts to the flow of traffic on N.E. 36th Street, record an agreement on the face of the Final Plat that each of the four lots will gain access from the proposed private road and that no direct access from N.E. 36th Street shall be permitted. If you have questions or would like additional information, please contact us at Extension 2550. hexmemo , . . . PRELL m -Tz - SHOR 7... SW 1/4 •OF THE NE 1/4 ( = SECTION 32, TOWNSHIP 24 N RANGE 5 EAST W.M. CITY OF RENTON, WASHING . • 1 "=40' .• . • • GRAPHIC SCAT,F • • i. . 0 20 80 80 180 ( IN FEET ) 1 inch 40 ft. • BASIS OF BEARING = KCAS DATUM - \ • • . • . - . N 88 09 29" W • •29!8.51' I 1A7?F' 151.25' I -,c) 17 f l' to 30' . R LOT 4 m • iv, /6-C-- si 0 g . LOT 3 .4 : ` 47 vtorl r....� O cV d•,!a•acret / 6,0017•tZ: °� 01 Nvi ki 0.3G 4cris• Mi I' • N ) A �, �.f I oC N f.8 ;2 0 i 1 fir 4.95' 5.05, N 2 ' r �7�1 116.34' 1 N 88;3O'?R" W N 88 30 26" W 121.39' "L N I W Zv I 0 = 9070'2C' o R = 89 49'40" IN LLIM :� R = 15.00'� ' N = 15.00' n ''j T 15.61' N _ 1 = 2r.52 . ^p o, L 23.61' uj L = 23.52' 0 2 0 1 2 ^ LOT i o (y/ri L✓ . N hib(lam W w WLI LOT_ 2 m IG73?�y,•F� d - Q h rn h r7'; :':t' = 89 1'19" 0,37 ucrel j R = 25. 0' f'30' ! • 0-Yaorcf i ` o • . . T ='24. 9\ SW CORNER 2 i C OF LOT 9, BLK 4 • 132.26' .3Q 00' .111.64' N 885122" W 273I .90' • 30' . °' . 30'. 4._655.11' N 885122" W ;\. • 147.26' - -.'., - - - - 1, 181:19' ' -• 30' • NE 36TH STREET • 30' EAST 1 • • SEC 7704 . E.K44;r A . . • YOR'S CERTIFICATE 01 0y • RECORDING CER77FICATE • f i WAS F AP CORRECTLY REPRESENTS A SURVEY ��� •H4Q • FILED FOR RECORD THIS Df 9Y ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT7ON IN to ,A x __ Al • _ PRFLL • SW 1/4 •OF THE NE 1/4 i SECTION 32 TOWNSHIP 24 N , RANGE 5 EAST, W.M. • �� CITY OF ••RENTON, WASHING: • 7 "=40' • • GRAPHIC SCALE• . • • _ 0 20 10 80 16160 , • ( IN FEET ) ' • 1 inch = 40 it. .. • : • BASIS OF BEARING = KCAS DATUM. , I • i .I: . N 88.09 29" W 1 N 147.25' 238.51' ! 1 - 151.25' ----A • • 30 0 I LOT 4 :f h N .. ,' I I v\ �_ xa! . (I' , ' . LOT 3 I as aa.a 1 n,an.c n. I . 1 N .. • a3e aa,a N 1 N L Nµ Lu • 1:::; I 1 N c' I .__.... .__ .'."' _ I n 35.00' 35.00' rn o a N 88... 26" W oo - 1 112.25' 2 N 4.95' S.05N 2 116.34' I 117.21 N 88 30 26" W N 8830 26" W 121.39' Lu N I W • • = 89'49'40 '.0') Z 111 h R = 15.00 t 0 N R = 15.00' �7 (�1 cq T= 15.05' N O Q `a T = 14.96' o `� o^ • L = 23.61' h o L = 2352' oto Z ^ LOT 1. ' o rn W ^1 15,914 sq. fL W . I . , LI LOT 2 • . CO 0.36 acr•js , 0 i a,rr« 11) 0) - h • 66 = 8931'19" �;30' R o ') • • T= 24.79 SW CORNER Z Z L = 39.06' OF LOT 9, BLK.4 132.26' .3YQ 00' •111.64' • N 88 51 22" W 273.90' - I 30' O' • 30' 655.11' N 88 5122" W \\' - , 147.26' - -.- - - - - _ - - �: 181.19' 30 NE 36TH STREET 30 • EAST 11 ' SEC770k • EX4 4.1.1.. 0 . YOR'S CERTIFICATE �ES11 �' ON RECORDING CERAFICATE <,,,' 0\NASy1 .( . 'AP CORRECTLY REPRESENTS A SURVEY ��� (�'� 4'Q FILED:FOR RECORD THIS DA BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTION IN , z