Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLUA90-116 i 2 , W 0 SCALE 12oo' Lu co Q a n. /.. 100 . NE ;.; MIN ., sr o ;; oar a::_, x �� fl:�. ••�' - NEIGHBORHOOD DETAIL MAP , s :=1 _ LEGEND ❑ . .d 6 n 9 (� NOT OIA N Y. ! ,. I /; A0. lJ-' IZ 0' El. na 'o' El . I S�S� � act 17 9 47 . ❑ 0 ° • cr- lAR� N E' OPP'. • a.. • . `��yU 4.+C4�( *lagainfulV a*I 1 . .,..,.. t PD. 0011 amnia .C...: /..200' APPROVED.•: .......JP/AS •`,»'`" ....:3_I9_9O ..1. '9114"° WOODLAND INVESTMENTS .VE..± SECT/OA/B TOW.✓SH/P 23.✓04Ty 457A/G£ S E/S'ST Pi/Y. 7-I t-9° PC.eox 2z/Xs7El//1/NAXY/L WOODINVK XTOFLE•wASNINomu'Solt WEST, VIEW ADO/T/ON I 90043 e 2 W C SCALE I=2oo' W NE I4TH .1Sr 0 ; oad . a:: . -Q: 13): - ` �..� NE/GHBORHOOD DETAIL MAP ck V L1 0 �7 _� D:::". • El L7-] d ❑ a_i ::=1 — rnI IRS I LEGEND I -\\ ❑ ;LJ LJ 1 �J O I I[ EA� _ _. DRIVEWAY N.E. 1ZTN Sr . E o • QI ,✓e NE BAR . IIIIIIIIIflppr 4,,,•,.V t.Y44 • ,e ea aaw& . .. ... �� ra P.O. gMIYl�61 4 �.,. ...: /...200' ...,DYED,. MAY..a..SP/AS ` 3-I -90 .EYnED OpAt l�� „ WOODLAND INVESTMENTS .✓.f,it SECT/Ow'8 TOWA/S/f/P 23 4/ORT// /9A.t/GE 6 J ivAx. 7-/z-90 P.O.BOX 2257 WooDINV+LLE,WASN/N670N 18072 iteeemA NEST 1//EW�ADD/T/pN �90043 1 )�I O �.. 2 t • S taF cwr,j J iO4f•pp(rces) sfc.I- J•S j � ��) 81 NE 501 . r�- ---�'�- -` -I AWL/WARY PLAT.,4/9P • %, I I \ I Ir z , \(Ba9 ) I 0 1 ♦ 1 \\° `l I (7,7 z) Im A[.Ir 9' e: WEST//1W ADD/T/0A1 ♦.♦ `` ki `♦,` 5 L�.�8 O°f ,`�`Af . oasgot/ %IVODO[BND AVEfTMENrS el �•�' - P.O.BOR [LS7 t "s 4 �: ` \ ♦• \ ♦, • �� I� 3 I M000/NW[cE,WA 9BO7E hoc . , \ t, zs4.L••:, \ ♦' -- •�'- ,� • /71.9f1\ I g ! 4aL>rr/°2 • •.o; t` , \ .� ♦� , \ , /A. ♦ - ♦ 'Orr{4 I y V` *Waist! RAY SLATER `�' _ , `s s \ '�T.lf \ a\ , ` . 1 .. 1\ J b --t y FICAO G/GmAN/RSSOC. ` ir ><6 a \ `♦♦ ♦•`♦ \sl °s.f0-f �`♦ \\\` `,`` �v ,♦♦``` \\ �t4 �9tY'!♦)� I' ,``�.` I'yy Al �-� St.ko> WOOD/N✓/LC wA 9B07e m \\ s zzz. s �^ ` \ ^1 �. �' • \I to ra • �� ti\ 416-/zse -, •� •♦, •, '. ' \`` ` . .r- ...►' '\ Nt` 4 -- (e331) \E A.(ER: .4.L8 waves ..�•- .'�C7+ \♦ + `,`• ♦ ♦`+, , " / __ y` - 1 -,; A1rR9-�-�`♦, \\ 9.04� ,1/O: Of LOTS.' /2 _ _ �r/9•tJ `� W� ; 1 fs .N ,1 ' e i a,`, r•5r)9, 1 ° zo��NfS: A 7200 1 vp . ,f- I i i ' 6r pr qtl x (,l0 //) ( ♦� Aa+fs-r ♦, r IG \ I b /AOMSEO D3'E: S/NGYE AMPLY AE90ENT/AL / ♦`♦♦`♦,, ♦, O. - .t l , Q y0 I t, I h erI 1 lZJ0.55 ,.4, C �` .rR`a\F / s\ 1 b \ 0 II r1 l 7, r r N b • li i \I f\ r �'y���4 •♦♦ M ♦� K \\(72L3) ••. IT E FB,'CEN17i6E Or AREA.w SrAEEr: /AS% o • 1 r I r IO I I 1 �' I ) 1 1d♦,M o ►mr nor J y � 5`, 1\ qy;, • . . ,.. �r 1 t 1 w I V• t V p � i`^ t1` •$sH1) w t! ♦m ♦♦` � ' 6,5t, �I•,�t:1 l� t 1 I ,. t \'W. \•c ` \0..4,.t- •�,, M`'• .1,�. - .- N j/i •'ZO• i ` pt `tt ,I\ ♦� \Yin to '\ •a,-, ♦ it _Y Z,♦ $ f• -.L._y.• V y° • • f`j • \ • ^i '` `r ehf% �w ). • .,;.,tt� ji!- \``, S A�Y r 4 9 SCALE:/�40• �s� , , ,t \ , '93v- -v' `\ ,r R\, (7 3 ) I `"1 a UESI:RII'TIUNS Ja ia'. . se as, w\\ f1' •\ ' 1. • sC h ~` earui l: ') `` a{- 1 O s ,Sj O e That portion nt the f„Ilot,ln...!exrrineJ C ,,= ) .\ , . . 1\ (77Ge)4.,,/Hoe' , 4441_01,0 .,V 0O X "' I fP prapony lying Northerly m the Nnrr1,Renton _ \` L• D•72 G Lm42.30 ♦ O\ 1 ,Jf.S' Interchange, SR 405, as condemned In Rtnp s '\.� 0 10 ``s t`` \ t + `� ,'` / Oy• "—'L r `�\�•O'o� 91�+ County Superior Court C.n000 Nu.'55n771. \ ` \ \� ,--IN I \ \o O \ i ,- that portionof Elie Northwest quarter of the JUL✓ %/a /770 �`\, � .� 0 1 1 " r Northeast q „rter of Sett„n R. Township 11 - �ft �rCv/SCD J.IN. /*7/ , `,t ,'+ „1• •• 91 `` 1' N N IS le North, Range 5 FA... W.!!.. !n Rlnf.Comity, •...r\ ,rC✓ISeo TAN, t7,N \ i ,c` , e (ROTC[) ♦, 1.. I 7` � t,f Washington. Jenctr,yd s follows: .Jt, •s t"g `� `1'f `), , `\ 11 In/ginning nR.,t the North 11 moor r.• of O.�- - `/ rt - ♦♦1'. <." •t , eald Section 4: thence 51N)_+ Snr tt• �• '. • \,,,,,,. ,\ rN•' / �\' .5 �' along the N9rr:, :Inv el ,.aLt'.er-t l. \ '' O 7e7.64 feet to rite 1'illlt:ntll01 °r shhINNINO MT 1• 1 - Nam, t41•• of the tract heroI-,de:.crihed: t:•-u.., z�\ �.a•� ♦ . ) \ 9R ` g 0-15-45 a 01.47 ...et; thence h-35-27 W • � \•� S -4 N. 11� 410.41 seat to the t.,st erly Purr In of the • �; ;mot 'J a 0 , Puget Sound Power.. I.::hr Coop;o.e's eight- �0,a_O�-.` , G''a , y6`S ♦ V of-Coy: thence s t5-07-id y...19n, She i J2 V Easterly eargln of the roger Sound Power E. ZAP•-� •• / 1.\ m 'M• ��' Light Company's r,ghr-of-way, :.:7.IO feel; _ 1/ ``k t `, a thence N 46-15-27 C 505.17 feet. thence q 0-35-45 W 710.91 leer to the North line Z+��� / ``♦ r Acr ,1f \ or id Section N; rheot.- '•g9-J/.-'n W NOTct: Vc• • / ! ,O/3 ) 1 y{me North line,.r said section. •dn O • \ rr t 'wet co THE TRhr.P0151 nl Ntt.INN+NI.: fate.. /) N.G.P.f. • NR7/Vf u`Rowr.' r.'a ..14 • /p° 'r - known as a portion,.f Nta Neatoo i,e,n Sites. PROreerioN E.9sE/neWT- V��1e /so• "rr "` 'Se m.to vacated. .,. recorded-.. .nlnme•1: a, 2J PRACr A'/0 7s ri,.P E- AND /S 70 er3g . j Z 1' \ 'a0 Plats, p:•ge s. I„glee,mn ,. l;.,unlnnten). BE-9rrRCNEO 7-O rwE 7/7LE OF LOT/Z. " `\ ,♦ J)TRACT B 'S.4 N.C.P E. AND is 7o BE fJV_` (I,,' ", s r Parval Arr'CNED r0 rNE T/7LE OF LOT N. 7•- COQ/9 /' 70 tract :7 hart tes ,.'den I . 144e •: 5 �1• OE fI uALL✓ON7NCD`,AND ..p0/ term-ding to plat r enlydt, ,.ul9me , 4)TRACr C /S A N.G.A2: AND /s 70 Be —' M1%1' mF7NIN/NCD BY COT 'se9-zJ-reE 'I I^dtn, sage 'IN,, In 1I.a ante, NrrACNED r0 THE rir[E OF COr /O. Ow,/d1G .rNO/s TOR t P2./ O4A/ygGf /47/uSC1\ W.ubinte. I:e 18t Inrhkt1 rtr , o Ult. t .57.JSEC • AD.CO/NL SCr.BRC4- .d/NE 'N F, \ North Eno feat of 'laid, , I.:nµ Beat •()rNE .lS&C. F40R7 7CP OF BRNA• FO4 COTS 9 7N4U/Z )- - 'the Feat :7 feet there.,. "'MYCN N✓ BE 44BUC ED 01,TN rNe•.9FP.r°oRC OF 7NE Cirr OF X /� .\ RrO w,rw ewe'SVS//77rrA[ OF A CEOr4CNN/C A?/ORT- , ':a er�- .a 1j !urn Q,."'><'ft1)10 ,. a t 1r MOMS.WOOD Itnt.Lc WA-a1.:/2 ts1 4104111 \.-�• I . i. f .cut./tea}pr u..o,so Ill r..r... S10 \•,< t1. e.rt L-/4=-9I 'so.,rn • • y . + s'�rk Lh JON& /YTENB/EL %amen Wo.WVST, F.O. e0K rzs7 WOOa,VWLCE,WA 7807E Ale•± SECT/fOA/8 7 WSN/P a3Nam!, /mow S EASTa i1!M• \zt • 4-/4-9/ IAf[7AVNAAY/Y.IT OF a'yo°¢.s *WIT YaW ADD/T/0N • / _ _ _ -.•n-.:.r;_.��.;:,' J!' ='!; '"IR';_:.. a ►�T,e�rRrl •hy.7J nub') - � • 1/A3fC.a-23-S ,*Z.,is •.1 f ee. tvezaris79st, "I Sece cot. T � " ` la.ad Mk ; x . It , • • •_.�_ -— —7 r_ -- -1 f1rYGYkf/ARY•PLAT i'JAP t I \ `` • b \ c) ' ( � 1 `"'--,..1, (797 Z) ALST A f: WEST VI1� oWD IT/ON 1 \ � r ra y\ �s \ L• I OAWGt/G[YELOiwyr: JOAV/IRENB/EL - • __� a°^'�'� \A� %waOOLANO •M'VfST.`IENTS e o !, e \- -is `•b `t. • �` ' \ ` ``\. ~ -'s I. 2 I I • P.O.BOA 2257 k: - 5 H-33-00 E s •` ` qt. 6ip ` ., `, V `�,j d \ I =S I IKODD/NV/LLE, wA 91107e at.00`, rt r+i``` \ •. 24-4.6•`,. '•. \ •` •., \`` 3� /Ln. -4 ^_ '.� 0 t 'O r{ /7694J\ 1 ,'\_ _1 465-1/02 �•'o t •r -.- `� `� ` - ....NJ, I\ \ I "`IFF• y V- - DMwYE1/Q4,: RAY SLgTER s` �q `` ` `.•r,� 7''41 \ `� ` CA a\ , ). . ' • 11- .. ` 1 sc. �' '-crr Ye.r7EA0 OrznrAN 4 ASSOC. .FG. > \ , ` •� \`'�`., •`-., 1w. \ , `'\ 8�, :� •, � r r.:. ` • 6 � ,, a' RO. BOA 386 ,,,) \ . s2e'\atO_ .` \ `, \`� \ \w st C9ityl�J\ I" .• `. t.ii � I yl-yt - �s>F N000/Ns',Lce, wA 98072 F \ `, `Sp Lz2. 74. \ \' IN, \ �\�. \• . \1 ::sc + D•jer • tiS ae6 /zs2 �9 . \`• . \� �. _ . i\ R'632 ` -ram \ �� �, •` \ . ` _ ` 'y' --__._ t{`. O. (8331) \ otleA: 3.68 .9CAES • \ llY/ (�A�CTS, �1 `[ •� t \ .• ) . . 6R•0•QO-00-41 \ 9•p 1 /✓D. OF LOTS: /2 •.\ �.` r9/9.1'•J t `t ` \i ' 1. -#.�, r • �.` L°WB:Ee a frs 99' I0 ZON/.V6: A 7200 \`�.`'. `. d i , 11 O 07 1 M (/O�//7 1 !'1: •� O -•T7S `�F Ill \ d A /AOI'DSED as-E: S/N2LE FA/rbCY AE9DENTiAL / 1 1 tt i ; i n O 1_ I 4 =T I \.1Z-prs4 O . ^,.R / S\ b I 11 • 1 NI. i \1,01 I 6•9!• 'a` . - � \ I s o�•, /6ACEN1 76E OF A,CEA.W Srigeer: /3.8% • / • I r 7t 7 / �. b I �.f, I [ 't\ M p. �Aiwa's1,se y • \\C7223) o p0 r 7y ! / I ; 1 t 1 1 1 , 5 "t, it II Me ` " ,`• I\ \ B;p, 14Crf• I I I I I I u'_�,-+r:!1 .`�•_.•� . +f t%w♦rN I \ �(9., ..,.!�:+.,e 1 ; I ' '\�I.. V\ :::``ak:f\ o 'Wit'.,' n z 1,7 4u1 ,,, {t\ .• 1• ; i • 1 \ • b ' ' 1 I.I tt 1`t \t• /0 \ �'•w I t Aye' �C f .$e §(8) '- ar t' a� .' v z= - . - \%/ I , Ott \t i> t , %/0739) \ ... OO.r-\`�(� t� f_ - o \ `\ gh x ` ;\zt • 1 •6 l ,`Ni`.� �� ~`;\ �yA k 6 !s� N eis git"�' 1 SCALE:/.40 `6, t , �\ 'L '• k -�`\ 8 Ss� h� ,•5 q3`t • •,' ., \ . V (7F 93 ) ,h W, •ST DESCRIPTIONS Ti //.2•A.S.A'C.1/D/AN 9e `\ •� ,\ ,- If \9 \ .! 0 X t TT` Parcel I: '9 1` -" r ••a2.. ..FAO. .rA I :ry O f�� That ties o: the following escrfined ��\ —1111111_-- ` • ,\` ••, 11 C72 OBJa.11-� �/QGt0f2 5,0.30 rJ.� o\ i u [\1 ``t`(• 11 Property lying.Northerl.•of the Norrh Renton 0 to 40 0 • ` t , t`1\ 4./9. V /\`a `\\n_• �It interchange, SR 405, a. condemned In King "s a 1 \Iq .� a, _ I� 'o\ t �505'�+ County Superior Court Cause No. 6567i 1: •p-D JUL Y_/1 /990 - - \`�`` `` 1,`` .. `,\\\ § ``5 • i1 \ 5 O 1 } (/� Norththat portion quarcu the Northwest 8quarter nahip t-1,e ♦S\ EYiJEO JA.Y. /G 9/9/ . \ ,V \ 1. 4i O' . \ 1 , /( „ H „yt- I• I \ North, Range 5 East, Secti .n King nshity, �,\ irewsf0 .7AN. 27,9/ . e IN `N \,` (807'S) ,. I 7 `•\ 4 unnhingtnn, described,s follows: O\ S \1'r _/ J ) �\ •\` Beginning at the North quarter to of !� - .1 (� , said Section 4; thence Na89-_7-50rli 1 't ti G 5 along the North :In..of sold so,-0'e,. \ �`. { '�( 767.64 leer. co t'NE 1'NOP. POINT Or hIt:INN1N1: 1• { Nf, j3� of the tract herein described; thence -Z\R. • 1 \ 9N ` S 0-35-45 E 623.4; •eet; thence s.-35-27 K • • \sue,' -� Y 111• • 410.41 tee[ to the'sisterly margin of the ���\�:� .w``.� _ `.1 \\ 34 F• •• 1 Puget Sound Pow•ar.5 I.:vhc Company's eight- ` �� . 6' . of-way; thence S 15-0?-50 E along the �-� ' `.\ e?a N• S V ' Paaterly margin of the Poser Sound Power 4 • R /+(- ,` thence Company's right-of-way, :27.10 feet; �\ k \ , a thence N 46-35-27 E 605.7!feet, thence • r^^v y� `,\ N 0-35-45 N 710.91 leer t the North line V'+t^ \`` T/PACT �,Y , of said Section R; thencetS 89-[2-50 0 VS.•✓07_ESr J\ Q 2 \` ("/0,0/3 ) slot*the North line of said section. •00 / N.G.Re. = NAT/VE v`ROWTN 0 ss fee[ to TEETRn'E POINT New KEI,IN0'Nr:o(also o \_ /0 • known a San of New Kenton i..i, Sites, P.IOTECT/ON EAS EmENT. T4 �i /250• e O\ e, now vaeated. as recorded in Lolnme 17 of 2)7-.(BCT A'/S A.l!G.P E. gNO /S 70 1. \ ` 'oO Pla[s, pace O.as nexluc snare, Washington). BE gTTgCNEO TO 7-,e 7/T(E OF COT/Z. y, Y �,` ``` 3) TRACT B /S.P N.C.R E. AND /S 70 Be OV` 7. . `'y Parcel -• ATTACHED TO THE T/TCE OF GOT //. n 18- 80 if /S TO • tract 27 harries.•,nits ha l-ace. J\ 1� BE EOOALLY OwNGD`,AND 4)77PACT C /S i9 N.G.A.E. AND /S TO AE � 'Oo ending n plat recorded .niume to .,� 1 /nA/c-•er f0 BY LOT of Plats. nage TR, In!I. q OG/NERT .P.a/o/s /o,e \� 589-23-2BE ATTACHED 77J THE T/TCE OF LOr /O. P•/ OBa/ggGf Auxruse.S� 'ntV J)BSBC - BO/CO/NG se T,gACA- UNE \ \ N.rshinrt/n;feet of th st p t the 1 \ 1 j North 100 feet of said t 1'i..ng Lest L)THE BSdL F.Co/A TOP OF BAN/- /OR COTS 9 TRRa/a the Past .7 feet thence:. AMY Be BED1/CED /V/TN THE APP.eovAC OF THE C/Tr O/ X � AENTON u//TN rOE Su6.01/7-7-AL OF A co-0 TECV/N/C R8,4,8r. \ < '• :+ . V ff1� i. ,- Ai! 8,J1•.'YCKI > <(('�"` 'A0:7119e WOO ;4VN.LE:WA•rd7l0 I:.a31 d'1bf$ \ I AS' • o e.tma / APPROVED P• • /c _ Jt> n ,-, o.rr 6-14-•9/ .evero B'0 . - - ' *WA ✓OH/V A'AEN6/EL A(E, tSECT/O.✓B TO/YV.QH/P ej NO�PI/1, /fANGE S EAST, I{ei►J % s:eweuRNo ngvsT., tee. BOA .o wooavv/c A /uA_Von ial• 6-/4-9/ IRE[/•w/NARY/LAr OF 'e�9oD48 T viEw 4POir/ON • • :::•:.GS. :.': :: 'F*i:iRENT..::............... ;CURRENT:::: .;;.>.::•::.�::.:. <:::.:;: ::;::•::.::.::.:::.;:.::::.::•;:•::.;::. ::::. :.: . ::.::....:.:: ...:.......:..:::..::....::::: <::BY::;:MAY.LYNG:::>;:;:.:;:;:::::::::::.::.::::::::::::::;:::::: On the 116 day of t5ul<ne_, , 19 q , I deposited in the mails of the United States a sealed ennvgelope containing 4.e. e-y,AA,AmNerlReetar a documents . This information was .sent to: • Name Representing • 19o..4‘.6 • L,ky .. to.c.kv.r, . • • • • • • • (Signature of Sender) .4NskytL ° 5;eeml4W- . •Subscribe �6a4 i .. / �,�°®��n to me thi•s day o 19 q! . eee GP ......•'°G�'4 Q` ohm set" � '�'�• •Oi I :v NOTARY VI Nota • ubl ' in and for the • PUBLIC : .(A Sta � a in ton residing ��oy g - � )`•v;It 9 i9g•• '�pe�• a t A Z'jit-�ti oe#o������WASH�-sie then in. ' .ro iii,Miltiitiiiirikilpi:vii*liAiMirpfri5%::.V.MMO • • ..... ................... ........ ..... ;ro:>::ec.t: N.uirib r. :::.: :`; :::: ;:..:,;;::: ': •-::::;>:;;:: :;;:�;: :;::.;.:;:.:::.::.;:::::::•::.:«::.:::::::::::.�:::::::::::::::::.�::::::.:. • • PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF RENTON JUN 2 1 1991 iiitUOVED oryopRE�o N AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION 491 L e A n n e Hutton 44 TY,being first duly sworn on oath states CORKS nD 51 0 6 7 that he/she is the Chief Clerk of the VALLEY DAILY NEWS NOTICE OF • Kent Edition ! Renton Edition • Auburn Edition ENVIRONMENTAL R DETERMINATION NVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTON Dailynewspapers six (6) times a week. That said newspapers The Esvissued aal Reviewmnon of Committee published (ERC) has issued Determination of Non- are legal newspapers and are now and have been for more than six Significance-Mitigated for the following pro- months prior to the date of publication referred to, printed and published ject(s) under the authority of the Renton in the English language continuallyas dailynewspapers in Kent, KingMunicipale Code. The following cAesscants) g have completed a mitigation process: County, Washington. The Valley Daily News has been approved as a legal West View Addition Preliminary Plat newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for ECF,PP-116 so KingCounty. The applicant seeks to create a 12-lot preliminary plat,to permit future devel- opment of single-family residences, The notice in the exact form attached, waspublished in the Kent Edition erty two tract lots on a id3.e9 ial acre;rcels erty. The proposed residential parcels XX, Renton Edition XX , Auburn Edition XX , (and not in will range in size from 7223 sq. ft. to supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers 10,939 sq. ft. The project site is locat- ed on the south side of NE 12th during the below stated period. The annexed notice a p b 1 not t i Street, west of Aberdeen Ave. N.E. Further information regarding this action #5 7 6 8 is available in the Development Services Division, Third floor, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington, 235-2550. This Deter- was published on May 2 0 1 991 mination is FINAL. To appeal this Declara- tion, you must file your appeal document with the hearing examiner within fourteen (14) days of the date the Declaration of The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the Non-significance is final or the Declaration sum of$ 59-94 of Significance has been published in the official city newspaper. See City Code Sec- tion 4-6-23, RCW 43.21C.075 and WAC 197-11-680 for further details. There shall be only one appeal of a Declaration of Non- Significance or Declaration of Significance, and if an appeal has already been filed, your appeal may be joined with the prior appeal for hearing or may be dismissed if Subscribed and sworn before me this 29 day of ,May 19 9 1 the other appeal has already been heard. -a This appeal period which will end at 5:00 p.m. on June 3, 1991. Any appeal of this decision may be made to the City's Hearing Examiner, Municipal Building, 200 Mill Ave- nue South, Renton, Washington 98055. An appeal must state clearly, in writing, why • � the Determination should be revised and must be accompanied by a non-refundable Public for the State of Washington $75.00 filing fee. a ry g Published in the Valley Daily News on residing at Auburn, May 20, 1991. Acct. No. 51067. 5768 King County, Washington VDN#87 Revised 4/89 CITY OF RENTON • :-- �L� \ U.S.POSTAGEEq�' % �, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT -_ II ��� � z JUN17 91 ^'1r,'? i 200 Mill Avenue South -Renton, Washington 98055 ntb,z1.=5 ; vMASH• S F90 At2. : : , PLANNING DIVISION . CITY OF RENTON JUN 2 4 7997 r- -) RECEIVED E.:. G. Wohlhuter ' 1127 Aberdeen Ave: NE . ---- - -- -- .7 Renton1 ,r , 055 - KOi DELiYcRA' - - !,S 40DRESSEb- -t - r ior,i 1+laBLE TO FCRWARD �f @ 4�',�'i ? TURN TO SENDER 4 ,), iitl ihiliihi hlaiil ndiliiehnhil ihnidi . a. NOTICE TO ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON HEARING EXAMINER RENTON,WASHINGTON • A Public Hearing will be held by the Renton Hearing Examiner at his regular meeting in the Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall, Renton, Washington, on June 25, 1991 at 9:00 a.m.to consider the following petitions: • WEST VIEW ADDITION PRELIMINARY PLAT ECF;PP-116-90 The applicant seeks to create a 12 lot preliminary plat, to permit future development of single-family residences, and four tract lots on a 3.68 acre property. The proposed • residential parcels will range In size from 7223 sq. ft. to 10,939 sq. ft. The project site is located on the south side of NE 12th Street,west of Aberdeen Ave. NE. • Legal descriptions of the files noted above are on file in the Development Services Division, Third Floor, Municipal Building, Renton. All Interested persons to said petitions are Invited to be present at the Public Hearing on June 25, 1991 at 9:00 a.m.to express their opinions. w W 4 . W m t i\ 0 :=';: • • • ILTN + Sr I7 . is o o. o.- d V Asa '.., ❑ �0,�` ID TI 19 . o ff 0 0 ,..t.5f,....:..„.... hex gr 4/46- CITY OF RENTON ��`,- -5 ��� \ f-` 5 U.S.FOSTA3E-FC ?-- COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 1 ,,r,�}n l JUN17 91 �. I (�; 200 Mill Avenue South -Renton, Washington 98055 k I i.. . ;•;j k WFlSH• * '-, 1 F�oa�iE sz : : ; PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF RENTON �l • JUN 2 4 �9�1 H. F. Lobban . : ' • ' • . RECEIVE" -. 1151, Aberdeen Ave. NE - . - • NO [ :1-:.3! E -P.en d 98056f ,�; v 4 . ' . As Gl :.; "t - I E r,3. n I Uil A 3 L t-�: .,- .r_ -- • _ [RETURN TO SENDER \e,4.d��; ltII IId.II,slII,IuttmItfili.III,IiIIi+IIIltltl NOTICE TO ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON HEARING EXAMINER RENTON,WASHINGTON . A Public Hearing will be held by the Renton 'Hearing Examiner at his regular meeting in the Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall, Renton,Washington, on June 25, 1991 at 9:00 a.m.to consider the following petitions: WEST VIEW ADDITION PRELIMINARY PLAT ECF;PP-116-90 The applicant seeks to create a 12 lot preliminary plat, to permit future development of single-family residences, and four tract lots on a 3.68 acre property. The proposed residential parcels will range in size from 7223 sq. ft. to 10,939 sq. ft. The project site is located on the south side of NE 12th Street,west of Aberdeen Ave. NE. Legal descriptions of the files noted above are on file In the Development Services Division, Third Floor, Municipal Building, Renton. All interested persons to said petitions are invited to be present at the Public Hearing on June 25, 1991 at 9:00 a.m.to express their opinions. II W W O W m s NE 14TH 'f 11: I a: d'; B. o:'. I:\ u ::ilf ,.. • _Di n.T o I,N \f . ., 1I 'A. �' 1t A Jj 11 Y: /. .\ € ILTH t. sr 1i .\ ❑o o o. o. rii d pia •` _❑ \ 4t6 altoq . . d PeO l — r i at o ❑l'es 4/46- hex % * Pp g - . vik OpprA•gm ii. a:•• CITY OF RENTON . U.S.PU,S'TAStAb 7. . COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT çic2 JU Wv 200 Mill Avenue South -Renton, Washington 98055 i WAVA. 1 RieIea—' PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF RENTON JUN 2 4 1991 -' RECEWED II, James Clark ___ 1171 Aberdeen Ave; NE —• . nt DELf�E �� R-efton WA ,9,:. . 1AS A€ODRES ,,_' ; i !r 6!' , 1LINAHE TOECTa{D ' ` Vi_ 6� d RET!JO SENDER ..CO *� I{, „ „1,1l,,,af,l„lj,,,,ll,ll,eli„l,lI„I,,,I,ll PLANNING DIVISION Cry OF FIENTON NOTICE TO ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS JUN 2 4 1991 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON HEARING EXAMINER RENTON, WASHINGTON A Public Hearing will be held by the Renton Hearing Examiner at his regular meeting In the Council. Chambers on the second floor of City Hall, Renton, Washington, on June 25, 1991 at 9:00 a.m.to consider the following petitions: WEST VIEW ADDITION PRELIMINARY PLAT ECF;PP-116-90 The applicant seeks to create a 12 lot preliminary plat, to permit future development of single-family residences, and four tract lots on a 3.68 acre property. The proposed residential parcels will range in size from 7223 sq. ft. to 10,939 sq. ft. The project site is located on the south side of NE 12th Street,west of Aberdeen Ave. NE. Legal descriptions of the files noted above are on file in the Development Services Division, Third Floor, Municipal Building, Renton. All Interested persons to said petitions are invited to be present at the Public Hearing on June 25, 1991 at 9:00 a.m.to express their opinions. tu W NE ;, M•TN ,f tier , a 01: it p L co ••Q ❑ o•' Gc,.r a ... cui 1 F iI ❑'. ❑n o o. d'_ I. • q 9 hex gra 1/46.4 ' CITY OF RENTON iE.vron Sr�o� COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT _ u.�.�sr�,s�^� fi JUN17 91 �,"�'1 �''� �1 r 200 Mill Avenue South -Renton, Washington 98055 r*:-..: 114/_ v A wash• if e a-; • pL4:T::ry� NG DI�lSION � RENTOi� ,_ Barbara. Decui r•' ' I • ' • 2013NE 12th S ,�,. , 11DT DELIVERS--_._-:lmAM- enton .WA 98.5' '4 - • iif AS ADDRESS(U w;1. [ .6b1 \ / UNABLE TO FGrt)„,r-r' ,-____f �, 4u u col RETURN TO SENDER 1" ? .t`V llelttl.ttltlltttti,IIIIitttt1tihilittillttf:h+ilttl r J. � NOTICE TO ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON HEARING EXAMINER RENTON,WASHINGTON A Public Hearing will be held by the Renton Hearing Examiner at his regular meeting in the Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall, Renton,Washington, on June 25, 1991 at 9:00 a.m.to consider the following petitions: WEST VIEW ADDITION PRELIMINARY PLAT ECF;PP-116-90 The applicant seeks to create a 12 lot preliminary plat, to permit future development of single-family residences, and four tract lots on,a 3.68 acre property. The proposed residential parcels will range In size from 7223 sq. ft. to 10,939 sq. ft. The project site is located on the south side of NE 12th Street,west of Aberdeen Ave. NE. Legal descriptions of the files noted above are on file in the Development Services Division, Third Floor, Municipal Building, Renton. All Interested persons to said petitions are invited to be present at the Public Hearing on June 25, 1991 at 9:00 a.m.to express their opinions. W iu 0 . w m NE ;(011 ►4TH• a IF d r, 1 �t \.. d i ,rf{ e,.�, •r1=b Ni n c .b r Q bit , C3 MIT . . • • y 1 . .1 � 0‘ ___a_______LN . 01 ° : of o H 0...., .....:_•[3 4Q, . ,---n- i .--,--.- .hex CITY OF RENTON 7, �;< S COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENTPOSTAGE-kS U _ it v Ir a 200 Mill Avenue South -Renton, Washington 98055 E , 1 C ` `' ..) ; 9 i * n : PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF RENTON JUN 2 5 1991 a•` Robert Edwards , Jr. 500 Union St. , No. 240 . . Seattle WA 98101 ' - Tic.- _,:,,-:Ja i{ ,,,I0 a� NOTICE TO ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON HEARING EXAMINER RENTON, WASHINGTON A Public Hearing will be held by the Renton Hearing Examiner at' his regular meeting in the Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall, Renton,Washington, on June 25, 1991 at 9:00 a.m.to consider the following petitions: WEST VIEW ADDITION PRELIMINARY PLAT ECF;PP-116-90 The applicant seeks to create a 12 lot preliminary plat, to permit future development of single-family residences, and four tract lots on a 3.68 acre property. The proposed residential parcels will range in size from 7223 sq. ft. to 10,939 sq. ft. The project site is located on the south side of NE 12th Street,west of Aberdeen Ave. NE. Legal descriptions of the files noted above are on file In the Development Services Division, Third Floor, Municipal Building, Renton. All interested persons to said petitions are invited to be present at the Public Hearing on June 25, 1991 at 9:00 a.m.to express their opinions. ' W - G W ALE 147.4 t o. d ❑ p:.; � d a..:: . - " '2' Ef Ela QE bQCaa NOT O /I N •, � N. �`1 , .� f`l � I �• t'rk ❑ ❑bOO. t l: I I I I \E`� `'1� \ pl 9 cn rJl \ Er ‘LN hex Pfr �1roprAmm. • 4.T;;77777101114""Wiliist,------Ws":-77 CITY OF RENTON 7--, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT • JUN 17 91 200 Mill Avenue South -Renton, Washington 98055 PLANNING DIVISION I cfry OF RENTON waskk• •-c....,/ EmETER' * * 4 JUN 2 0 1991 RECEIVED . I . . . • : : ••:„!!•,, --,-.1„f,,,I.:•• .0..• -; -. ' • ,-;•,•• --., ', ,. . Estate of Fred Akers .n.r. ,, A - c/o Patty Akers- Nelson 3017 92nd Ave: N.E. . J . -.J 'E•e:,-,.. - _,.., •L:.:1c . Bellevue WA 98004 NOTICE TO ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON HEARING EXAMINER RENTON,WASHINGTON A Public Hearing will be held by.the Renton Hearing Examiner at his regular meeting in the Council Chambers on the second floor Of City Hall, Renton, Washington, on June 25, 1991 at 9:00 a.m.to consider the following petitions: WEST VIEW ADDITION PRELIMINARY PLAT ECF;PP-116-90 The applicant seeks to create a 12 lot preliminary plat, to permit future development of single-family residences, and four tract lots on a 3.68 acre property. The proposed residential parcels will range in size from 7223 sq. ft. to 10,939 sq. ft. The project site Is located on the south side of NE 12th Street,west of Aberdeen Ave. NE. Legal descriptions of the files noted above are on file In the Development Services Division, Third Floor, Municipal Building, Renton. All Interested persons to said petitions are Invited to be present at the Public Hearing on June 25, 1991 at 9:00 a.m.to express their opinions. N w w O w m N NE S+TIj •f IF , ... •e dk4\ a D Ii . -r= \ \ a., a. . ';‘.Ji. , .A. ; A F1 il. ,.. A 4 ❑� \ ❑O 6 o. 0' k , \ PPo1�� \ p 9 0. o f t o _ o • hex 1,46- 1r ` 1 Pp-I . • August 5, 1991. Renton City Council Minutes Page 272 CAG: 91-088 '& 089, Development Services Division requested authorization to raise expenditure PACCAR & Orchards amount in consultant agreement with Stalzer and Associates to provide Projects Environmental & environmental and land use review for the PACCAR and Orchards projects; Land Use Review, Stalzer required expenditure $12,000. Refer to Planning and Development Committee. Streets: Commercial Transportation Division requested revision of office and commercial parking Parking Requirements requirements in Parking and Loading Ordinance.. Refer to Transportation (Aviation) Committee. CAG: 91-090, 2MG Utility Systems Division submitted engineering consultant agreement with Highlands Reservoir Construction Technology Laboratories, Inc. for 2 MG Highlands reservoir Design, Construction evaluation and rehabilitation design; expenditure required $20,500. Refer to Technology Labs Utilities Committee. CAG: 91-091, North Fork Utility Systems Division requested resolution authorizing execution of an Springbrook Creek interlocal agreement with King County to implement the North Fork Pipeline Interlocal Springbrook Creek regional bypass pipeline project; required expenditure Agreement $146,196. Refer to Utilities Committee. CAG: 91-092, Jail Health Police Department submitted Jail Health Services contract with Seattle-King Services Contract, County Department of Public Health; required expenditure $45,304.00. Refer Seattle-King County to Public Safety Committee. Health Department Police: Exotic Animal Police Department requested Exotic Animal Ordinance to provide dangerous Ordinance or exotic animal control within the City limits. Refer to Public Safety Committee. Plat: Preliminary, Hearing Examiner submitted recommendation for John Krehbiel (Westview Westview Addition, - , addition) preliminary plat located at 1800 NE 12th Street; 3.68 acres, 12 Krehbiel, PP-116-90 , 11 single-family lots and 4 tract lots (PP-116-90). Council concur. MOVED BY NELSON, SECONDED BY MATHEWS, COUNCIL ADOPT THE CONSENT AGENDA AS REVISED. CARRIED. Separate Consideration Mayor Clymer recommended appointment of Donald Jacobson, 2919 NE 5th Item 7.g: Place, Renton, to the Planning Commission to complete the unexpired three- Appointment: Planning year term of Kathleen Crow who resigned 7/11/90; term to expire 12/31/92. Commission In response to Councilwoman Zimmerman's inquiry, Mayor Clymer stated that the City has advertised for applicants to serve on committees, and that he reviewed the list. He said citizens have been reluctant to accept a Planning Commission-assignment due to the controversial issues it faces at this time. MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY MATHEWS, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE MAYOR'S APPOINTMENT. CARRIED. INFORMATION ITEMS City Clerk submitted final 1991 population determinations from the Planning: 1991 Population Washington State Office of Financial Management; Renton 1991 final Determinations population determination is 43,000. WSDOT: Certification of City Clerk submitted Washington State Transportation Commission State Highway Routes certification of State highway routes and notification of limited access facilities on State routes as of 7/1/91. OLD BUSINESS Referred 7/1/91 - Council President Nelson presented a report stating that Committee of the Whole the Council met as Committee of the Whole on 7/8/91 to review the proposed Finance: Budget Fiscal fiscal policies. It was the Committee's concensus to adopt the proposed Goals & Policies policies. It was determined that Goal 8.A, dealing with the percentile at which compensation levels are set, should be left blank and adopted as part of the City's compensation plan. MOVED BY NELSON, SECONDED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Budget: 1991 Referred 7/15/91 - Council President Nelson presented a report stating that Housekeeping the Committee of the Whole met on 7/22/91 to review the proposed 1991 Amendments Housekeeping Budget Amendments. After discussion, the Committee recommended that this matter be referred to the Ways and Means Committee for preparation of legislation. The amendments total $14,653,729 and include $1,776,480 for general governmental funds; $10,589, 193 for Capital Improvement Project (CIP) funds; and $2,228,056 for all other funds. Amendments include the following items: `T,; CITY'OF RENTON imam .1 Finance Department Earl Clymer, Mayor. August 6, 1991 Mr. Steve Malsam 105 Central Way, Suite 201 Kirkland, WA 98003 Re: John Krehbiel (Westview Addition), File No. PP-116-90 Dear Mr. Malsam: The referenced preliminary plat was approved by the Renton City Council on August 5, 1991, subject to the conditions specified in the Hearing Examiner's report, dated July 8, 1991. Renton City Code Section 9-12-6-B.8 requires submission of a final plat within three (3) years of the date of preliminary plat approval or the plat elapses. A written request for a one year extension may be filed with the hearing examiner not less than thirty (30) days before the expiration of the three year period, showing that the applicant has attempted in good faith to submit the final plat within the three year period. Please feel free to contact this office if further assistance is needed. Sincerely, `d11 Marilyn , ' sen, CMC City Clerk 235-2502 cc: Mayor Clymer Council President Hearing Examiner Mark Pywell 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL AI #: A, i SUBMITTING DATA: FOR AGENDA OF: 8/5/91 Dept/Div/Board. . HEARING EXAMINER Staff Contact. . FRED J. KAUFMAN AGENDA STATUS: Consent X SUBJECT: JOHN KREHBIEL (WESTVIEW ADDITION) Public Hearing. . PP-116-90 - property located at Correspondence. . 1800 N.E. 12th Street. Ordinance Resolution Old Business. . . . EXHIBITS: Examiner's Report of July 8, 1991. New Business. . . . Study Session. . . Information. . . . RECOMMENDED ACTION: Council Concur 1 APPROVALS: I Legal Dept 1 Finance Dept. . . . 1 Other FISCAL IMPACT: N/A Expenditure Required. . . Transfer/Amendment. . Amount Budgeted Revenue Generated. . . SUMMARY OF ACTION: The applicant requests approval of a Preliminary Plat to create twelve (12) lots for the future development of single family homes, and four (4) tract lots. The property is 3.68 acres. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The Hearing Examiner recommends approval of this request, subject to the five (5) conditions set out in his Report and Recommendation of July 8, 1991. There was no appeal filed on the recommended conditions. %3 CITY OF RENTON Hearing Examiner Earl Clymer, Mayor Fred J.Kaufman July 23 , 1991 Steve Malsam 105 Central Way, Suite 201 Kirkland, Washington 98003 RE: John Krehbiel (Westview Addition) File No. PP-116-90 Dear Mr. Malsam: The Examiner' s Report and Recommendation regarding the referenced request has not been appealed within the time period established by ordinance. Therefore, this matter is being submitted to the City Clerk this date for transmittal to the City Council for review on Monday, August 5, 1991. It is suggested that you contact the City Clerk' s office to verify the above date. You will be notified of all action taken by the City Council upon approval of the request. Please feel free to contact this office if further assistance or information is required. Sincerely, FRED J. KAUFMAN HEARING EXAMINER FJK:dk • cc: City Clerk Building Division Planning Division Mark Pywell, Senior Planner inn x,r;ii A.,PnnP grnith - RPntnn Washiri tnn 9RO55 - (2061 235-2593 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING STATE OF WASHINGTON ' ) )ss. County, of King ) DOTTY KLINGMAN being first duly sworn, Upon oath-, deposes and states: That on the 8th day of July , 1.991 affiant deposited in the mails of the United States a sealed envelope containing a decision or recommendation with postage prepaid, addressed to the parties of record in the below entitled application or petition. SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this day of . , 1991. cif Not ry P is in and for the State of Washington, residing �L(h Clot , therein. Application, Petition, or Case qi: PP-116-90 - JOHN KREHBIEL (WESTVIEW ADDITION) (The minutes contain a list of the parties of .recotd.) July 8, 1991 OFFICE OF THE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION APPLICANT: JOHN KREHBIEL (WESTVIEW ADDITION) File No: PP-116-90 LOCATION: 1800 N.E. 12th Street SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Preliminary Plat to create a 12 lot future development of single family homes and four tract lots on a 3.68 acre parcel of property. SUMMARY OF ACTION: Planning Division Recommendation: Approval, with conditions. PLANNING DIVISION REPORT: The Planning Division Report was received by the Examiner on June 18, 1991 PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Planning Division Report, examining available information on file with the application, and field checking the property and surrounding area, the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: MINUTES The hearing was opened on June 25, 1991 at 9:00 A.M. in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. The following exhibits were entered into the record: Exhibit #1 - Yellow File containing application, proof of posting and publication and other documentation pertinent to this request. Exhibit #2 - Vicinity Map Exhibit #3 - Preliminary Plat Map A review of this proposal was presented by staff member MARK PYWELL, SENIOR PLANNER, and a summary of his comments follows. This project is located on the east side of I-405, is shown on the Comprehensive Plan as single-family residential and on the zoning map as R-1. A portion of the project site is in a greenbelt area; there are 3.68 acres that will be divided into twelve single family residences and four tract lots. Pywell said the ERC reviewed this proposal and issued a Declaration of Non-Significance, Mitigated, with conditions (copy attached). The applicant has already complied with some of the mitigated conditions with an amendment to the preliminary plat map shown as Exhibit #3 and has shown compliance with a geological report required for the site. The density to this site, per code, is six units per gross acre. This project is using approximately 3.3 units per gross acre. The applicant has submitted a tree retention plan calling for the saving of trees within the greenbelt area and those outside of the roadway that will be provided, as well as trees on the steep slopes. Pvwell said drainage on the site will be controlled by bringing it down to a detention pond on Tract X, where it will flow through the site and out to the west of the site. The plan has been reviewed by the city's Storm Water Division and is felt to be adequate. All of the buildings placed on this site will be outside of the greenbelt area. The size, shape and dimensions meet design standards, lot sizes meet code, the project meets the subdivision standards in that the corner lot has been platted larger than the interior lot; vehicle access is via a cul-de-sac roadway connecting to NE 12th Street. Planner Pywell said the steeper sloped areas would be divided into three separate tract lots and sold with abutting residential lots, will not be further developed, a natural vegetation easement will be contained on each lot and each owner will be responsible for the maintenance of their lot. Mark Pywell said after review, staff feels this proposal is timely as this is' a larger lot in an area that has already seen some subdivision of large lots; the property is served by city utilities and John Krehbiel (Westview Addition) PP-116-90 July 8, 1991 Page 2 infrastructure; pedestrian movement within the tracts will be along the cul-de-sac and out to 12th Street. Pywell noted staff's recommendation of approval by the Hearing Examiner, subject to the conditions set out in their preliminary report. The applicant has agreed to make a voluntary contribution to the city's park fund. Responding for the applicant was STEVE MALSAM, 105 Central Way, Suite 201, Kirkland, 98003. Mr. Malsam referred to the tract lots and noted the Environmental Review Committee, not the applicant, suggested the division. He acknowledged the applicant's willingness to voluntarily contribute to the park fund. GEORGE NELSON, resident at 2008 N.E. 12th, Renton, 98056 questioned the installation of sidewalks and storm drainage for 12th Street. PLANNER PYWELL said the applicant will have to comply with city ordinances in the area of his own project site frontage. Storm drainage will be brought to Tract X and extended along the back of the property until it connects into the existing drainage system. MR. NELSON said there is no drainage on 12th at this time, it runs down the south side of the street and washes out property each time there is a storm. The Examiner noted that the project site is actually down-slope of 12th street and drainage should not effect 12th Street. Mr. NELSON said his property is on the north side of 12th Street. PYWELL said it is his understanding that all of the water will be directed to Tract X and none of it will be allowed to flow off the project site more than it does at the present time. He said further storm drainage in the area will be provided as the area is developed, and this applicant should not be expected to provide extensive improvements beyond his own project. Other comments were received from LORI MAHER, 1208 Lincoln Place NE, Renton 98056, which is across the street from the proposed project. She wanted to know if some form of buffer will be provided to shield her home from viewing this new project, and if some of the current vegetation and trees will remain. She was advised that the Traffic Division has reviewed this proposal and feels there will be no impact. Ms. Maher said Lincoln is just a dirt road and the water run-off from behind her property makes the roadway look like a river. She wanted to know if anything can be done on this project that will help her situation (she owns lot #268). The Hearing Examiner advised her to contact the Public Works Department and let them know there is a problem of drainage on 12th Street and they may be able to advise her of some alternative action that can be taken by her as an individual, or possibly the neighborhood could join in the formation of an LID. She also questioned when sidewalks would be provided and was again advised that as properties develop the city will require those developers to add sidewalks for their properties. Resident JOE POLACK, 2001 N.E. 12th, Renton 98056 wanted to know the size of the homes to be built. Planner Pywell said at this time the city is only reviewing the subdivision plan, there has been no development plan for construction of the homes presented for review. He noted the R-1 zoning does allow for two-story family homes. MR. POLACK said when he purchased his property in the 60's there was a proposed street for the front of his property (lives next to proposed lot #1). Pywell said the Transportation Department did review this plan and did not indicate any plan to put a street in the general area of Mr. Polack's home at this time. He suggested that Mr. Polack contact that division and perhaps receive more information, if any is available, about future transportation plans for that area. The Examiner called for further testimony regarding this project. There was no one else wishing to speak, and no further comments from staff. The hearing closed at 10:15 A.M. FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & DECISION: Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: 1. The applicant, John Krehbiel, filed a request for approval of a 12-lot Preliminary Plat on approximately 3.86 acres. 2. The yellow file containing the staff report, the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) documentation and other pertinent materials was entered into the record as Exhibit #1. 3. The Environmental Review Committee (ERC), the City's responsible official, issued a Declaration of Non-Significance - Mitigated (DNS-M) for the subject proposal. 4. The subject proposal was reviewed by all departments with an interest in the matter. 5. The subject site is located on the south side of N.E. 12th Street, just west of Aberdeen Avenue N.E. N.E. Park Drive forms the southwest property line. ► N John Krehbiel (Westview Addition) PP-116-90 July 8, 1991 Page 3 6. The approximately 3.86 acre site is a roughly triangular-shaped parcel. Access to the site is provided by a 226.98 foot dogleg frontage along N.E. 12th. The remainder of the north property line (approximately 445.60 long) is offset to the south 100 feet. The eastern property line is 506.18 feet long. The southwest property line is approximately 760 feet long. 7. The site has very steep slopes at its westernmost corner. The property in this area slopes downward approximately 65 feet - from 215 feet to 150 feet. The slopes in this area exceed 25 percent. The easterly two-thirds of the site have more gentle slopes with the elevation ranging from approximately 260 feet to 230 feet. 8. The map element of the Comprehensive Plan designates the area in which the subject site is located as suitable for the development of single family homes and greenbelt, but does not mandate such development without consideration of other policies.of the Plan. The developable portions of the site and the greenbelt portions reflect the topography of the site, with the greenbelt reserved for the western third of the site. 9. The subject site is zoned R-1 (Single Family; Lot size - 7,200 sq ft). The site was initially annexed to the city with the adoption of Ordinance 1796, enacted in October, 1959. 10. The applicant proposes dividing the subject site into twelve single family lots and four tracts. The four tracts would not support development, but would provide a means of preserving the steeper slopes and providing storm water retention. 11. A cul-de-sac located more or less centrally would provide access to the interior portions of the parcel. The street appears to run in an alignment with Lincoln Avenue but it has not been assigned a name at this point in time. 12. The lots range in size from 7,223 square feet, just over the minimum 7,200 square feet required in the R-1 zone, to 10,939 square feet. Proposed Lot 5 is the 7,223 square foot parcel while Proposed Lot 10 is the 10,939 square foot parcel. 13. The lots generally form a 'U' around the cul-de-sac, with Proposed Lots 2 through 12 gaining access through the cul-de-sac. Proposed Lot 1 would access N.E. 12th, while Proposed Lot 2 has dual access to 12th and the cul-de-sac. 14. With the exception of Proposed Lot 2, which is rectangular, the other lots are irregularly shaped to accommodate not only the cul-de-sac and its turnaround but the triangular shape of the overall parcel. 15. Tract X, an approximately 10,013 square foot parcel, is located in the southeast corner of the plat. This tract would be owned in common and would be maintained and reserved for drainage purposes. 16. Tracts A, B and C, (all located at the extreme western end of the site), contain the steep sloped areas. These three tracts are generally located west of the 210 foot contour elevation and contain the steepest slopes found on the site. The applicant proposes tying these tracts to Proposed Lots 12, 11 and 10 respectively. While ownership would be attached to the adjacent lots, these tracts would be set aside as part of a Native Growth Protection Easement and could only be used for passive purposes. No development would be permitted on these three tracts. 17. A geotechnical study prepared for the site determined that the site can be developed with single family homes if the steeper slopes were left undisturbed. That study prompted the ERC to impose the Native Growth Protection Easement and the Tract X drainage requirements. Additional guidelines for construction contained in that report would guide actual development of the site. 18. The 12 lots would increase the area's population by approximately 30 to 40. Approximately 6 of those people would be school age children. 19. Staff projects that approximately 12 single family dwellings would generate approximately 120 new vehicle trips per day. The Traffic Division reported that these additional trips can be accommodated along N.E. 12th and adjacent roadways. The cul-de-sac can also accommodate this level of traffic. 20. The site is served by the Renton School District. Highland Elementary School is approximately 1 mile southeast of the site, while McKnight Middle School is approximately a half mile northeast, with Hazen High School approximately two and one-third miles east of the site. John Krehbiel (Westview Addition) PP-116-90 July 8, 1991 Page 4 21. The nearest park, North Highlands Park, is heavily utilized and the applicant has agreed to mitigate the impact on the parks by paying a fee equal to $1,800 ($150. x 12 lots). 22. Staff has recommended that fencing be erected along the rear boundaries of Proposed Lots 2, 3, 7, 8, 9, and 10 to provide separation and privacy for the homes that are eventually constructed on those lots. Staff also recommended that the applicant erect a fence along the entire east property line. 23. Proposed Lots 1 and 4 abut one another, and Proposed Lot 6 is configured similarly to 7, 8 and 9. Fencing would also insure privacy for these additional lots. / 24. Staff recommended the creation of a Homeowners Association to maintain the fence and the Tract X common area that will provide storm water retention. Staff also recommended that outside of the building envelope and driveway, all trees in excess of 6 inches in caliper and 15 feet be retained. They further recommended that any tree removal of damaged or diseased trees be replaced on a three-to-one ratio. 25. Both water and sewer are provided by lines that run along N.E. 12th. Storm water runoff is channelled by a system located along Park Avenue, downslope from the subject site. CONCLUSIONS , 1. The proposed 12-lot plat appears to serve the public use and interest. The site is already in a developed area of the city and development here would prevent unnecessary sprawl into outlying areas. The area is already supplied with water and sewer service along N.E. 12th adjacent to the site. Storm water is also provided by a system downslope from the site. 2. The development of twelve additional single family homes would expand the range of single family dwelling choices in the city. Obviously development will increase both the overall population and traffic of the area, but the numbers in both cases are not considered substantial. The road network in this area is adequate to support the proposed development. 3. The block and lot layouts are reasonable given the unusual shape of the parcel and its relatively steep western topography. The preservation of the slopes in excess of 25% is appropriate given the greenbelt designation found in the Comprehensive Plan. The apportionment of that property to Tracts A, B and C is reasonable, as is the tying of those tracts to the abutting lots, Lots 12, 11 and 10, respectively. The ownership relationship should provide stability and upkeep while preventing development on these steep slopes. 4. Staff's recommendation to provide fencing should be extended to encompass the addition of similar fencing along the common property line between Proposed Lots 1 and 4 and to the rear of Proposed Lot 6. 5. The applicant should also create a Homeowners Association to maintain the common areas of the plat including the fencing and the storm drainage system located on Tract X. 6. In conclusion, the proposed plat with the creation of the Native Growth Protection Easement, the storm drainage system on Tract X, and the preservation of significant vegetation should be approved by the City Council. RECOMMENDATION The City Council should approve the Preliminary Plat subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant shall comply with the conditions imposed by the ERC. 2. The applicant shall erect a six foot solid wood fence along the east boundary of the plat and along the rear of Lots 2, 3, 7, 8, 9 and 10, between Lots 1 and 4, and along the rear of Lot 6. 3. The applicant shall create a Homeowners Association and it shall be responsible for the upkeep and maintenance of Tract X, the storm water control systems, and the common fencing. The face of the plat mylar shall also reflect these responsibilities. 4. The face of the plat shall reflect the preservation of the Native Growth Protection Easement and the relative associations of Tracts A, B and C with Lots 12, 11, and 10, respectively. John Krehbiel (Westview Addition) PP-116-90 July 8, 1991 Page 5 5. The applicant shall comply with all requirements of the city's Tree Preservation Ordinance. ORDERED THIS 8th day of July, 1991. _Val+FRED J. K FMAN HEARING EXAMINER TRANSMITTED THIS 8th day of July, 1991 to the parties of record: Steve Malsam 105 Central Way, Suite 201 Kirkland, WA 98003 George Nelson 2008 NE 12th Renton, WA 98056 Lori Maher 1208 Lincoln Place NE Renton, WA 98056 Joe Polack 2001 NE 12th Renton, WA 98056 TRANSMITTED THIS 8th day of July, 1991 to the following: Mayor Earl Clymer Councilman Richard M. Stredicke Don Erickson, Zoning Administrator Lynn A. Guttmann, Administrator Members, Renton Planning Commission Jim Hanson, Development Services Manager Gary Gotti, Fire Marshal Ronald Nelson, Building Director Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Jay Covington, Mayor's Executive Assistant Transportation Systems Division Valley Daily News Utilities System Division Pursuant to Title IV, Chapter 8, Section 15 of the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 P.M. July 22, 1991. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is ambiguous or based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for a review by the Examiner within fourteen (14) days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific ambiguities or errors discovered by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record, take further action as he deems proper. An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Chapter 8, Section 16, which requires that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk, accompanying a filing fee of $75.00 and meeting other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection or purchase in the Finance Department, first floor of City Hall. The Appearance of Fairness Doctrine provides that no ex parte (private one-on-one) communications may occur concerning pending land use decisions. This means that parties to a land use decision may not communicate in private with any decision-maker concerning the proposal. Decision-makers in the land use process include both the Hearing Examiner and members of the City Council. All communications concerning the proposal must be made in public. This public communication permits all interested parties to know the contents of the communication and would allow them to openly rebut the evidence. Any violation of this doctrine would result in the invalidation of the request by the Court. The Doctrine applies not only to the initial public hearing but to all Requests for. Reconsideration as well as Appeals to the City Council. • PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER West View Addition PUBLIC HEARING June 25, 1991 Page 6 H. DEPARTMENTAL RECOMMENDATION: Staff proposes that the Hearing Examiner recommend to the City Council in favor of the West View Preliminary Plat(File No. PP-116-90) subject to the following conditions: a. The applicant shall comply with all conditions required by the Environmental. Review Committee in conjunction with the Determination of Non-Significance - Mitigated, issued on April 24, 1991. b. The applicant shall provide a six foot (6') solid wood fence along the east boundary of the project and along the rear of Lots 2,3, 7, 8, 9, and 10. c. The applicant shall provide an agreement on the face of the plat, ensuring that a Homeowners Association shall retain responsibility for maintaining all common facilities (e.g. storm water detention system,fencing). d. The applicant shall provide on the face of the plat, an agreement ensuring that all trees greater than 6" in diameter and 15' or more outside of the building and driveway outline shall be retained, except that diseased or damaged 'trees may be removed with City approval if they are replaced wuth a species approved by the. City's landscape architect/planner at a ratio of three tree for each tree removed. Note: The applicant shall comply with all Code-based requirements for on-site and off-site improvements prior to making application for final plat. • DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED MITIGATION MEASURES PROJECT: West View Addition Preliminary Plat PROPONENT: Woodland Investments APPLICATION NUMBER: ECF;PP-116-90 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant seeks to create a 12 lot preliminary plat; to permit future development of single-family residences, and two tract lots on a 3.68 acre property. The proposed residential parcels will range in size from 7223 sq.ft.to 10,939 sq.ft. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: South side of NE12th Street,west of Aberdeen Avenue NE CONDITIONS: The Environmental Review Committee Issued a Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated with the following conditions: 1. The applicant shall, In order to ensure that the significant trees on the project site are retained, provide a Native Growth Protection Easement for the slope area and the significant trees outside of the building pad area and road right-of-way. This easement shall be prepared to the satisfaction of the Development Planning Section and the City.Attorney and recorded at the time the Final Plat is recorded. 2. The applicant shall, In order to ensure that Tracts A, B, and C are not sold in the future as buildable lots, record a covenant in perpetuity dedicating Tract A, B and C as native vegetation and open space lots. The covenant shall also state that title to Tract A shall conveyed with the title to Lot 12 and that the title to Tract B will be conveyed with Lot 11 and title to Tract C shall be conveyed with Lot 10 In perpetuity. This covenant shall be prepared to the satisfaction of the City Attorney and recorded at the time the Final Plat is recorded. 3. The applicant shall prepare an amended preliminary plat map providing three tract lots, replacing Tract A, to the satisfaction of the Development Planning Section prior to the public hearing by the Hearing Examiner. 4. The applicant shall, in order to mitigate on-site and regional recreation Impacts, review the Parks Comprehensive Plan and the proposed Master Trail Plan with the Parks Section of the Community Services Department to determine the Impacts, if any, of the proposed development on regional recreation facilities. The applicant shall provide: a) a voluntary contribution of $1,800 ($150.00 X 12 Lots) to the Parks And Recreation Fund with the fee to be paid prior to the recording of the Final Plat; OR b) an alternate plan for completion and improvement of on-site recreation facilities within one of the buildable lots. The plan for on-site recreation would need to be approved by the Development Planning Section and the Parks and Recreation Division prior to the recording of the Final Plat. 5. The applicant shall, to ensure that construction follows the guidelines established by the geotechnic investigation, record the following language on the face of the plat. A minimum building setback of twenty-five feet (25') from the top-of-slope shall be. • provided except for wood decks which shall provide a minimum ten foot (10') setback front the top of slope for Lots 9, 10, 11 and 12. The setback are shall not be used for placement or storage of fill materials, Including "temporary" excavation spoils from the building area preparation and excavation. Any development or encroachment into the setback area should be evaluated by a specific geotechnic Investigation. Reduction of setback Is possible only after the geotechnic investigation and approval by the City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works. The geotechnic report shall be submitted to the satisfaction of the City of Renton Planning/Building/Public Works Department prior to the issuance of any site preparation permits. mitmeas-1 Existing loose fill in the setback area shall be removed and natural vegetation provided In this area. Landscape plans shall be submitted to the satisfaction of the Development Services Division of the Department of Planning/Building/Public Works prior to the Issuance Of any site.preparation permits. Storm runoff from the Development shall be diverted away from the slope and not allowed to saturate the foundation area of the homes on Lots 9, 10, 11, and 12. 6. The applicant shall provide a covenant which establishes a Homeowners' Association, to be. responsible for maintenance of all common areas and facilities (e.g. storm drainage system, fencing,Tract X)with the Association to be in force and effect for the'life of the project (Including a stipulation that the City, at the Citys' discretion, may be permitted to enter onto the site'for maintenance if the Homeowners' fail in the task, with the financial responsibility to be borne by the Association). The Association is to be developed by a covenant, and described on the face of the plat, with both of these documents to be approved by the Planning/Building/Public Works Department and the City Attorney prior to the recording of the final plat with King County., Notes: At the time of the review of the preliminary plat before the Hearing Examiner, staff will make recommendations, including, but not limited to the following items: The applicant shall record note on the face of the final plat indicating that a six foot sight'obscuring wood fence or masonary wall shall be required along the east boundary of the development and the back of Lots 2, 3, 7, 8, 9,and 10. \ I I . L>.. • ... •�� L i L , ,MI6 I ,.: ) - 3 .... _+,t: 7 e �U •:i fill 1 � .ti '(NE•O i L ;\ . . 25 a®�3�01311 A .• , Vim L. 2__. G9 ® 2ia' s.\> , I Z8(o i a ZI�:1S 14 21.. / 10 7 i> t(1 )4 Z - :�4 vv t� �T �1 � Filli sss 320 N E : =6 �� �.,� :2'n" \\fin '•I '\ • �19 I : :a .: . ' • - — I�4 .3 ' VI r w • '. " -- , . • r w -2a� . 731 728 2u S o n , ' \7� Z .1_0— s i 243 0 r1t' L -:0." 2 • • j SCHOOL q, 28G, 8' Z3021111 u R • ,---___ \ n • .— tJ r;- .e. _ J W �--� Q 1 u JY: • > : t,�t• , - 1 , .) • . V_ . . .(_)'cm‘ ‘.\ / . .... ' QD • __. . ,',D ---.,.-A.;,ii, . ; ; :. :X„,„ .7 i \ • 3._ '''1_ ... ;i —\... u .,,, R-3. ; ... b '. - > . ., ,0 ,;I,=l,,It. S ". \S\ ‘ ...T.----,. .\,\ . 1. ' F1'.3 (i) • ) 1 • 4 A 4 . 4 • . .0--a—. -- : 4 ' ' 1 „.. t, I 1 i cc ..., i , zi ••. (...-) / . ,, . __. . , , ,:, 1' • n . ., 1 , .. \ , Imo'; ./• '3 7 „ 8,, pl u _ to-I y It ) t: ) , �� •(� O.0 L . i; Tao©�gQ.=, ., :,.. 2,- R • t� t,, \�� sj' Viz) N + •t .. . ) n_- ?, HIGHLANDS \ S T v,_.e • iLV West View Addition Preliminary Plat - • ECF;PP-116-90 • APPLICANT John Krehbiel (Woodland Investments) TOTAL AREA 3.68 acres • PRINCIPAL ACCESS NE 12th Street and Aberdeen Ave NE • EXISTING ZONING R-1 , , Single-Family Residential . • • EXISTING USE Vacant PROPOSED USE single-family residential COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN . COMMENTS Located on the south side of NE 12th Street, west of Aberdeen Ave NE ' W z w Q $C ILE / 200' co G F. ,n. ,.. NE • ItrH : ..Fr. ;' . NE/GHBORHOOD DETAIL NAP • ❑ F 0 D- :� — 4 LEGEND O q - oRircwAr or orlN 'Y .}? 1i •t �'" . . . 12 TH ST. ❑-' I \ \ ❑O O D = d ee \ 0 0 . lf DR ❑ Y yE �I PRIIIIIIIIr —.mild •00,10• CT.,: �.!t.4(.4y9 l .a � U'` L "__. �� i.la.. f PI10P17d0HAL LAM SUMMON 'i ,, P-0-BOX DK WA 9m772 PM 424122t (} ON uk WOODLAND INVESTMENTS 7_/2-7. P.o.dOX 225'7 Woo WAY ILLL,...Meal 0.14 M µ7N07L • NE..g SECT/Oi✓B TowAi '/P 23 AxafT/ /QANGE 5 E!'ST 1 n61 • ifc .,,,,vq/Y/zAr of � *EST Y/£W AOD/T/p/V 90e43 . . ,k.'„s 4tr•v 4....* . -0 Si? Fd .-... ,Ar) c 14s 'e- ..". ' •- . ..- ../ it.7)727-----7"----711 s-r,) , ' • ir..,ie. ...it rat e. kiAr z2v „ a. ., . . ,-, c,,A•I- ', SEC 8-C i-r , . i . • . . • \'-- $011,1„\; 'Is t-lt •.4 ' 0.021-121 . : :. 'a s• 'a !, • .- _.• - — ..•—-.7 oAr ' i .Al'EL//1/.4/ARY ...z,ar /1/9P . . •, , • I \ Z ss I. . ' . I. \ I • •• e le9°.) \ : ° N. • t , ' 1 \ ..1 (78.7Z) •Yt. A44r xAt,AfE: WL.57 iiIEW A1491217/0)/ , , • , , 1 \ i's. IA' .3., omortbacyci_DA-4: ,yd.vg if,e-HtriEL L . s , • •—-2 II:,.U.-o 0 r „._ * - "<., . - x le40.01,f,V9 AVVEST/fe,vr'S ‘.. • ‘q 2 '.'. 't• 'Is --t. '1,.. 'Ss 5' 1".... . \ \ .„. • \s ' $1 I— .7 7——I . s, 1• I Ad...10x eZ.S7 \ .1 \ .s N , , '•,, -1 fli,..-",-"1:... `.., • •.t-kr-44, . • • ,a. . ‘ 1 3 \ •— 1 rs ,..... ....„ 1 OcookVY/Lte, 1./A no7C ', ""Z•i6'` -'s ' \ ''s ‘,s'-‘e• \ '4;--. - a"...- '''''-1 . ' . ,st t 749•F.1\ I ...., -.., • ' --, \ s s'z..-1, - ....- •..,.‘ , \ /".\ •• .--- • • I p• ,\ \ 1 La ".....J - lillotY0'4.C: .. . • • ‘ • '''''' s, ''' eelIC...f -\ ..., ss % ss \ ,.., 1 • ,\ ..e. •„, - i . ---,„ . A""fs:orev:s1::cr/Le•prA,9,4/i fis.roc. v,. •s„. \ ‘ . s.: , ,,, s, \ \ 8, ss \ 4\%1 \,..„ 14, I , t s 1 , - - /.'0. ..So.x ..7,9 .... .. ,. s Z• • • ; 1 •A% • 4,- ../• , •.,-, .. A/000/NY/CLC, WA 98070 '2> • i. s I '• Z.I. ,IA \ \ \ \'''' 4-7ZZ'':„a-47''•\:•, \\,\\‘: ‘i \\ ‘‘)441 \\ \`e t\PZI:.1 \I E 6* \ \s •;,r,..„ -. .0' A ,.... ,,,,, 4.1 A-irS'e , s ''x. \ \ 1,r i.- I • /3. • • \ -. \.' \ • • s, e \ A 63 ' Ars s. :, ',, ">- • 4- „ • \ :', ' ---- ', ( 331) •••.. Aze-A: 3.18 ARCS 1q. S: \ S. \ t -• * __, , 1 \ ,.....,0-670-41 'N.... \ 4 • //o. a`Z 0 TS: /2 TC714?\, , ‘‘, W> s, \ ‘k \ , /1.214-•0°-_ . • \ 65-° 1 .. s I\ At • I ''' . s 1-04,9*/ ;I- ‘.. .., 51; 9' 1 ....•0 Y X 0/14445: A 7000 • . - 4-4-1.-_,,,, ..... I e- \ I ,.' • • •'' \ s •°- I/74-1) \ ‘.1 : °i... 0/ ''! 4''01 ; i ,( ,/) 1 . ._r \-.."' / . • s X . rs. • I /24°45.* s. " ,..„...4 A(oeoSe.0 List": 5/A/CLe r,f,•1/19 ReSoe,vr/44 I .• I • 1 riv 1. 1 11' it i,kS\ 1 \'' ,...,9/3 -, 0 , -• "ri<Cei,//746 r OF.f,45.4 ,4/..57-,reer: /3.3-% .• ' .1 1 / • . tt t t .._A t ' • s t .4 .44.8-41111s7,8 -AC r-, (7zZ 3)\ tr `,,,••• . i •1 • Ns •‘Co ,' ' IC, ' 1 ! ' \ I rs, \ t‘,`'.!.4'0 lerv,"-rvres••••• nv.r ,T. `‘ • 7.-14T : l''t 1 i 1 : I a . iv . _,,,._--, ,, ... \sti,,,, .,7-Y °(...\-4"4:....°).,e i\-4., ,, . s, I \ • -- , - .• - ---•,..,......-\•-•":-....••'-' t. '''t-i9rof..1) .s. ..'..,n v, I . I N• . .. .••.. . '1/7 . • ' -r..) , , , , . *, \-,i \--- , •q-..-, • ".-1 • ts, , ss '''... • . .., , ‘1, : •" . s•-•. 41,••• . .. 'r.,„ , , _ , ": \t, s' 4.c4's.. '''. ‘,-- 1_7--Fi•-..1c tx) ,.., ' A ,si,.‘ ,,v,,,•:) ,., \v 01, \ 'S:, ', -S.. -. >'1,°7S7‘) \ '-•. ‘`41, .°.°*(4' \ - ;‘; `, • .5e6e,‘, , .... . ,P,j). ,A•• \ i . k;V ' s , I •,, is 14 \ , \‘ z' \ ,• ,--\\ -y.-1. , • r • ‘,.,. • 45. - .5c.,•rif:/1 40• °Zs s, , • ,.. ‘ \rIt \ • . ; •7F 9..? ) . c o DESCRIrrION, •• .3" •:„. , , k 1.-- t • ,.-r N., 5,rEP ,y.c.,f.5.,YeX/DOW c , , • , , it. •,y , , I 'ell, ‘< ,(21-0 Pare•1 1:- -- '..1., \ .../ .e z ../.- ....l,. b 4.r. 4, (7.74e I.) ...10.(P 4°,4_ .•)‘.e., ›,‘, tr.,;\ ' • 1 . .‘, 1,r ."'".""'"""' 1"" 1-"."-"'•'—,,,—, —1....„, • , `, •\:' \ ` A-11 z. 1 ' z= ' ''° v,-- . property !yin.. Noctitt.rly ot the Sorri.ltre.t.... • 4,,,,.1 ,,, .42.3o r - - s.X.-r, 0'.‘,, , .r.r `. • '''.(• r Inc...Mt:tog, Sk 411., ...........:1V2111.,i S•••:.70-. 0 00 ..0 - .1° , \ \ ,, ,....,\ ‘... , / C. /........... Stt.& ' County Sopertor Con,t 1...•,:t... .... 1,',1 j,, ...,... \ \ \ , Vtt\ - \ •,,."0.‘;\ t ..70/0 Y..//,.2fvo..__ .. • \ , , .- . , e -' --I I • N vs`, ' 04,< that portion ot tn.. Not th,e,t plan., ol Ow No/Allen, q...,,,.. ..i 5,..t Itot tt. r.•...1.tp V...•‘ ..4.(kV-rep ../..1..e. /1.,9/ \ t, st \ - . ,,5 •\ \ ,• S, ^) b e s, ,I', il s, N N • North, Rao,. S fn.,. W.V... lc Is In..t'st..utv, -7....\-r• ,,ret,SeD JAM 1/,I/ 7. , '• (d9 74) ‘, '.. 7 •., N .. ‘, %tiff .-.5..;'-.r..- %, S. , \,, ' (. s 17 1 C - .. ' L • Ne;elno1n,;.n: t he I...t 1.7,...rter r•.r...., a C)‘•'..,, --, t \I.. (,:-'' ,- ..t1,1 S.,1•11•.. 4, i•.....,..I. tt,.•2•-.al t —1--• . • 41ott“1..., Nort•• :in. ..1 -. .1 ....,t.•.. \ '- .. • In*: i.. / ' , ... • 1 0 ;,,7.;.4 I..., ...., I,. 110.1F t•otitil tn. ..,..INNIst. -... •, . 1 • I ••• V"..". s „V.. r fliSI,r t rAct it,rei,.1.,..,-rt!,....1: 1.o.in, 7.--'''' c.C‘ - • ,.5` 4 ..... ‘ .- Ill.ii• ‘: s 4-1s-ts F h?':.4; •••,:rt then., .e. • 410.41 :ear to Ow r..sterle ',a:I.,. \ 54 L ' . Mega,. SounJ P.,..., . L:ehr Coypt..,... etµht• -',"<• -.CI ,...„, es ,„e . . ; .f-w.y; cht...... s •,. ..i..,ler., the s 26. . •4 Kmetuel es mArgin•If Ow !"..,t 5....le: rover I. / I/ • ""%.e. A,: ... er. - 1.101. Coup.tny't, r te.l.•..1•1..11, .";.i I/ f.:e1; ss thence N 46-35-27 C"05.'3 Net. 'hence • , ,\ N 0-35-41 1, 1111.91 s.:et t,• tl... N..rt:I I Ine ...,_,'".... --G%\t-71'' ./ • • 77.PAC r X , of said Sect Ion 81 11....''r 1•119•.11•"111"1 .' \-.' • A/01:er: \ W.:::, . / - '`<'"... .... • 1,_,..... • 0.9,0/3 ) • • .L1Jr).{ Ow •.itl 1%..“ to TUC 1115F 111IS1 ri n1;..:11,1Nt.• (.11.... A'f. • //AT/Ve a er0 b./r448 C...' C':.. —1zb -. , . knoen ue .1 ten t I..e.•: 1:,:e 1....i.,e1 p..eo recr/oA, e,is enre,ilr. 1,..T •,'". ....,, 4. --..c., --, . , s .......1.:.1,.. ... Ire.".i.,... n ...Twee I ..t 2,) r,c,rcr,..? /..r ...-/..*:C.":e. .v.,V,o .••S 79 --""\- 4— / /v .,._ te. , ., ,k-N. 1/ ,..., , Pl.., i.:,.e e, IS gl., 1,. 1;.,1.1.....t...,). se ,vrr,4c,ve0 -o Twe- r,,--cd• or LOT /Z. ...'",..„..., J) r,C,fCT .9 ../s ...0 ,v.6--. d-. ,,,,,,, .,„. rr, ,,,.. 'r76,\ .. es Kireol .!: . 7-.4".../C r',,.. is Po • S4.' Arr,,,c,no r-0 Twe r/r(e or zor a. . ere e 0 wicL Y owco`,Avi, .... e0_,,,,.., 4)7X4Cr C ,S A ./V C..R.ct", ,e,v0 ./.1- TO Be- -j--••\•\\' - yl..1. , .5 si-zi-zse ••• Wats. noec lh. In 11 •••ort e. ..9tr4eive*.O To r,ve r/rze- or e;-,1- /O. 1%:: 0414,14 GC" ...a.t/ceSCS"...„.„.. . weehl,t m; 11.:CF.1•1 t U.S : :1..•1, . tee 57 .8.1-.1"Z • "WC D,VC so r8800 Al.,,, ,otrth IIP. ‘.,•I ..1 ,...t1.1 t•-1 i .,:n, g.) 'we' AS.S.L- "%eon/ 70 f 0 f be f1-44,IC rot eor.f 9 rwt a/L \ PY • . *the n,, :7 (1,41 there,, /nAY Se 8584/CeD e.,,,r,/ /we'.9/88445'."/C or' 'we- c/r1-- OF . ,re,vroni ....,T,./ 'we, .5 us/lin-TA t. oe- A crore,C.v.V/c ,Pen,er. ...<•,; '..-•.....„.„ , • ,• , . ..• •• 4 .., Iimid SitPlan&aA42Cilltilke PFrOtasxy•uo vim e r.,,,7.-Yrnit ,,..., PA.MX SW WOOtmvx.i.E.v.? a3:,/:.ilt.G 416/111 N. 0 . • N,., - 1 . i r. -..-.5.:.‘, $• • -- ,-, - •,_.‘ ---- ..... -f--... XV' .....° -... ,j,---- -----. • (4..4 I.A4 JONA/ it'IrE1/8/EL , • 7 /5 -....-:, .pc,,,,....,..v...,vv..sr, ,lo. crox ez.57 4410011WVALO,iu,•I 1507c 1 SECT/oA 6' -6w41,0°e..3/V0477/, /7/7*6E' 5.nnsr, N/A! -..,_:v. • • . _ milr Yietif 4PP/r/ON I 9004-.5 - . ..:,. .....,............--.. . : . . O DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING APPLICANT: John Krehbiel FILE NUMBER: ECF; RVMP; PP-116-90 LOCATION: 1800 N.E. 12 Street A. SUMMARY AND PURPOSE OF REQUEST: The applicant seeks to create a 12 lot preliminary plat to permit future development of single-family residences and five tract lots on a 3.68 acre property. The proposed residential parcels will range in size from 7,223 square feet to 10,939 square feet. B. GENERAL INFORMATION: 1. Owner of Record: Patty Akens Nelson;William F.Akens,Jr.;and Lilly K. Blackman. 2. Applicant: . John Krehbiel 3. Existing Zoning: R-1, Single-Family Residential 4. Existing Zoning in the Area: R-1, Single-Family Residential 5. Comprehensive Land Use Plan: Single-Family Residential 6. Size of Property: 3.68 acres 7. Access: N.E. 12 Street 8. Land Use: One single-family residential structure 9. Neighborhood Characteristics: North: Single-family residences East: Single-family residences South: N.E. Park Drive West: 1-405 C. HISTORICAL/BACKGROUND: Action File Ordinance Date Initial annexation --- 1795 10-7-59 D. PUBLIC SERVICES: 1. ' Utilities a. Water: A six inch water line runs along N.E. 12 Street. b. Sewer: An eight inch sanitary sewer runs along N.E. 12 Street. c. Storm Water Drainage: Storm water drains in a southerly direction into a 36 inch corrugated metal pipe storm drain with several catch basins running along N.E. Park Drive. 2. Fire Protection: Provided by the City of Renton as per ordinance requirements. westview PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER West View Addition PUBLIC HEARING June 25, 1991 Page 2 3. Transit: The subject site is not served by Metro transit. The closest routes are #107 and #108 which run along N.E. Park Drive. 4. Schools: a. Elementary Schools: Highlands Elementary School Is approximately one mile southeast of the subject site. b. Middle Schools: McKnight Middle School is approximately one-half mile northeast of the subject site. c. High Schools: Hazen High School Is approximately two and one-third miles east of the subject site. 5. Recreation: North Highlands Park is approximately one mile northeast of the subject site. E. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE ZONING CODE: 1. Section 4-31-5, R-1 Residential Zone. 2. Section 4-31-35, Greenbelt Regulations. F. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR OTHER OFFICIAL CITY DOCUMENT: 1. Northeast Renton Plan, City of Renton Comprehensive Plan Compendium (pgs. 55-61). 2. Residential Goal, Objectives and Policies, City of Renton Comprehensive Plan Compendium (pgs. 14-16). 3. Section 9-12, Subdivision Ordinance, City of Renton Code. 4. Section 4-9, Land Clearing and Tree Cutting Ordinance, City of Renton Code. G. DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS: 1. The applicant, John Krehbiel, seeks approval of a preliminary plat to subdivide 3.68 acres into 12 single-family residential lots and four tract lots. The property is zoned R-1, permitting single-family residences on parcels which are no smaller than 7200 square feet. The applicant seeks the subdivision in order to facilitate future residential development which complements other residential development in the area and which can be supported by existing/proposed public and private Improvements. The twelve lots proposed for residential development range in size from 7,223 square feet to 10,939 square feet. 2. Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Review Ordinance and SEPA (RCW 43.21.C., 1971, as amended), the Environmental Review Committee Issued a Determination of Non-Significance - Mitigated, on April 24, 1991. A copy of the Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated is attached to this report. 3. Representatives of various City departments have reviewed the proposed preliminary plat. Their comments are integrated and discussed throughout this report. 4. SUBDIVISION CRITERIA: Chapter 9-12, Renton Subdivision Code, lists several criteria that the Hearing Examiner is asked to consider along with all other relevant information, in making a decision on a preliminary plat application: a. Compliance with the Comprehensive Plan Designation The subject site is designated for single-family use on the Comprehensive Plan Map. This area is intended for detached single-family dwelling units --.not exceeding a density of six (6) dwelling units per gross acre -- and related compatible low density uses. The applicant has proposed a development at a density of 3.3 dwelling units per gross acre. weslvlew O PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER West View Addition PUBLIC HEARING June 25, 1991 Page 3 Section I.E. of the Comprehensive Plan states that natural vegetation should be retained wherever possible in order to preserve scenic beauty and to prevent erosion. The applicant has submitted a tree retention plan that indicates that the natural vegetation on the steep slopes and out side of the building pad areas will be retained. The ERC required the applicant to provide a Native Growth Protection Easement for the slope area and for the significant trees outside of the building pad area. Section I.G. ,of the Comprehensive Plan states that to remove harmful materials and sediment, replenish ground water resources, and minimize erosion and floods, surface drainage should be controlled. The plans submitted by the applicant indicate that a detention pond will be provided in Tract X. This will allow the storm water to be released at predevelopment rates and should help to reduce erosion. The westerly portion of the project site, approximately 0.8 acres, is designated as Greenbelt. The Comprehensive plan defines this as an area intended for open space, recreation, very low density residential uses, agriculture or other compatible low intensity uses. Greenbelt areas are characterized by severe topographic, ground water, slope instability, soil or other physical limitations that make the area unsuitable for Intensive development. Provision for public enjoyment of greenbelt areas are encouraged; however, greenbelt designations do not imply the right of public access. This part of the project site has been designated as greenbelt due to the steep slope (25% slope). The applicant has designated the majority of this area, with slopes of 25% or greater, as Tracts A, B, and C. The remainder of the sloped area is within the rear portion of three lots. There is adequate area on each of these three lots for a building pad. b. Compliance with the Underlying Zoning Designation The subject, property was designated R-1, single-family use, at the time of annexation in 1960. Section 4-31-5 of the Zoning Ordinance (R-1, single-family use) requires that lots be a minimum of 7200 square feet with lot frontages of at least 60 feet (70 feet for corner lots), lot depths of 85 feet, front yard set backs of 20 feet, rear yard set backs of 25 feet, and side yards of five feet (except that side yards fronting on street corner lots must be 20 feet wide). The Renton Subdivision Ordinance requires that corner lots be platted wider than interior lots (See Section G.4.c.3. of this report). The Greenbelt Regulations, Section 4-31-35 of the Renton Municipal Code, establish standards for development occurring within the Greenbelt area on slopes exceeding twenty-five percent (25%). The average slope on the proposed lots does not exceed 25% (the lots range from nearly level to approximately 20% slope). None of the development (e.g. building pads, roads) will occur within the . area designated as Greenbelt on the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map. Therefore, no special regulations need to be applied. c. Compliance with Subdivision Regulations (1) Streets: The applicant has developed a plan to provide vehicular access to the property via a cul-de-sac roadway connecting to N.E. 12th Street. The proposed roadway conforms to standards established in Chapter 9-12 with respect to size, configuration, grade, relationship to the adjacent arterial, intersections, and design of the access points. (2) Blocks: The proposed plat essentially satisfies requirements for dimension and design as established in the Renton Subdivision Code. westvlew PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER West View Addition PUBLIC HEARING June 25, 1991 Page 4 (3) Lots: The plat as designed essentially complies with the requirements of Section 9-12 of the Subdivision Code, as established for residential lots with respect to arrangement of lot lines, as well as size, shape, and orientation of both Interior and corner lots. The plat does comply with Section 9-12-8.X.6.d which requires corner lots to be platted wider than interior lots. The corner lot is platted to be 70 feet in width and the interior lots are platted to have a lot width of 60 feet. Tract X, located in the southeast corner of the plat, will be used for a detention pond for the storm water. The ERC required the applicant'• to provide a covenant which establishes a Homeowners Association, to maintain all common facilities such as Tract X and the fencing. Tracts A, B, and C are the steep slopes located in the greenbelt area and are unsuitable for development. These lots will be covenanted in perpetuity to be sold with lots 12,,11, and 10 respectively. The intent is to allow the homeowners to have a limited use of the tract lots, while ensuring that the lots will be maintained. The concern is that if the tract lots were to be combined into a single lot to be maintained by a homeowners association that the maintenance would not be performed In , a timely manner and could become the responsibility of the City. fi •fly The ERC also required the applicant to provide a Native Growth Protection Easement on the project site to ensure that trees in the sensitive areas would not be removed without the City's review. The contours on the plat map indicate that there are slopes on-site winch will require consideration in evaluating the feasibility of locating single- family homes on Lots 10, 11 and 12. The Geologic Evaluation prepared by David L. Nelson, dated November 5, 1990, indicates that the slope on the project site is stable and should not prevent development provided that the guideline recommendations presented in the geologic report (see attached Determination of Non-Significance - Mitigated). The Environmental Review Committee established the mitigation measures, based upon the Geologic Evaluation, to ensure that construction was set back a minimum of twenty-five feet from the steep slopes and ,ithat drainage was diverted away from the slopes to control erosion. The average slope on the proposed lots is less than 25% so no special provisions for density reduction would apply under the Greenbelt Regulations. s, d. Reasonableness of Proposed.Boundaries The boundaries of the proposed plat are reasonable and the future development of the plat is not expected to result in any significant adverse direct or indirect impacts to surrounding properties. The proposed preliminary plat is an infill project in that other large lots in, the surrounding area have already been subdivided into single-family lots. Surrounding lot sizes range from approximately 7,500 square feet to a half-acre. The proposed lot sizes, within this subdivision, range from 7,223 square feet to 10,939 square feet which will be compatible with the surrounding development. e. Timeliness This criterion requires that staff assess whether or not the proposed platting action is anticipated to create a significant impact upon the City's development goals, public services, or infrastructure. (1) Development Goals The proposed plat is appropriate for consideration at this time as; the subdivision Is designed as an "infill" single-family development project, planned to be located in a neighborhood now zoned R-1, and developed for single-family use. The site would appear to support twelve (12)'new IND ..rn-A.I-ur PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER West View Addition PUBLIC HEARING June 25, 1991 Page 5 single-family homes,adding approximately 31 persons (2.59 X 12 dwelling units) to this section of the City. The parcel is currently developed with one single-family home that will be removed as part of this development. Staff believe that site features (e.g. terrain, size of plat, existing area development) also make it desirable to screen the site with solid wood fencing six (6) feet in height to provide site definition, control light and glare, from the development, and to provide greater privacy within the lots. The fencing should be constructed along the east boundary of the project and along the rear boundary of Lots 2, 3, 7, 8, 9, and 10. The fencing would be maintained by the Homeowners Association. (2) Public Services and Infrastructure The subject property is now adequately served by and/or can be improved so that it is adequately served by the City's public services or infrastructure. For example, utility lines are readily available to the site. The applicant will need to work with the Storm Water Section of the Planning/Building/Public Works Department to prepare the final drainage system to take into consideration the sloped topography and the surrounding sites as well as existing storm drainage systems. The maintenance of the proposed on-site detention system will be the responsibility of a Homeowner's Association. Fire and Police Services are available with system improvement fees and Code-required improvements to serve the planned single-family residences. The approximately six school-aged children anticipated to live in the development can be accommodated by the Renton School District at the Highlands Elementary School, approximately 1 mile southeast of the site, the McKnight Middle School, approximately 1/2 mile northeast of the site, and the Hazen High School, approximately 2 1/3 miles east of the site. Due to the distances involved it can be assumed that the students will have to take a bus to their respective schools. Local and regional public recreation areas are available to serve the site, including the North Highlands Park. These recreational facilities are heavily utilized and, as a result the City has determined that additional opportunities should be made available. Thus, the Environmental Review Committee has asked that the applicant make a voluntary contribution to public recreation improvements or to provide on-site recreation facilities within one of the proposed residential lots. Full development of the plat will result in approximately 120 new vehicle trips per day (10 trips x 12 single-family dwelling units - ITE Trip Generation Manual) to adjacent roadways. Transportation Systems Section staff reported to the Environmental Review Committee that the anticipated type and level of vehicular traffic increase generated by residents is expected to be consistent with the traffic levels generated by surrounding residential development. The traffic can be safely accommodated through the provision of the proposed cul-de-sac of off N.E. 12th Street. As the cul-de-sac is less than 500 feet in length and meets City standards, no secondary access is required. Movement of pedestrian traffic will be facilitated through the provision of a sidewalk adjacent to the proposed cul-de-sac along with all other Code- required improvements. In sum, any burden upon services or infrastructure can be mitigated by the applicant through compliance with code requirements, with environmental conditions (the Determination of Non-Significance - Mitigated is attached to, this report), and with land use conditions recommended in this document. Plans for such compliance are subject to approval by City departments as appropriate. westview PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER West View Addition PUBLIC HEARING June 25, 1991 Page 6 H. DEPARTMENTAL RECOMMENDATION: Staff proposes that the Hearing Examiner recommend to the City Council in favor of the West View Preliminary Plat(File No. PP-116-90) subject to the following conditions: a. The applicant shall comply with all conditions required by the Environmental Review Committee in conjunction with the Determination of Non-Significance - Mitigated, Issued on April 24, 1991. b. The applicant shall provide a six foot(6') solid wood fence along the east boundary of the project and along the rear of Lots 2,3,7,8,9,and 10. c. The applicant shall provide an agreement on the face of the plat, ensuring that a Homeowners Association shall retain responsibility for maintaining all common facilities (e.g. storm water detention system,fencing). d. The applicant shall provide on the face of the plat, an agreement ensuring that all trees greater than 6" in diameter and 15' or more outside of the building and driveway outline shall be retained, except that diseased or damaged trees may be removed with City approval if they are replaced wuth a species approved by the City's landscape architect/planner at a ratio of three tree for each tree removed. Note: The applicant shall comply with all Code-based requirements for on-site and off-site improvements prior to making application for final plat. 1111. ry 4 0 M• , � N. I � 1 NF gz'u..I' + W e1' + I. 1 •3 15 214 I •. .. Ifir® -- :..'.. rw,\\\:5 ". 0YT „1� i 1 ' I�u �' I I �,j I �1 r 1 qr w S ..l ''. \t n , jH . I , , , rt. • ,'. ,.," C..474 1 zF--1- 4 • • Nto l �-,jZ u _ - at' - - — -I >- ...; 74'J ,o4ro 731 7.213 71rs o 'li ' 11A61111:C'HCC111: . 11—. 268 Z�� 767 ! ' '4io\ ?30 �z914 • ' z„ P — 1 �� p' ' y = • i C _ ..2 o it - • >, 1 I ' is --- - -- ST1 n '� I : I[__ I" . r t� W s 3 j' �` (0 i R-1 4z'_ ate. \` ,,,` --- -. - r;'. .•. R-3 , >a ,,,A,, . 7_ B.- 1 1 . .,�o o� . QP i \I�\ f �-, .......• , (ID ' \ QL.1.\] : 0� �\ R 4 �� ` ... (• rr R-3I 35 \,; . r'; • �` R-4. ,!.1 ... . 9 re .1i,1+ 3=1= �r.r• N EW . • 00 • ' ii is • j 1 �'\ r u „u is i'� - i W a„:‘ •! OD / .3 ,•t 'r , �W r \, AM_.• .'4,1 / Ij • ' .' „ , is, q- + to i +y No \\� T1_' t s ` S , W i Q " , ELEMENTARY West View Addition Preliminary Plat • - • ECF;PP-116-90 • • APPLICANT John Krehbiel (Woodland Investments) TOTAL AREA 3.68 acres PRINCIPAL ACCESS NE 12th Street and Aberdeen ,Ave NE , EXISTING ZONING R--1 , Single-Family Residential . • EXISTING USE _ Vacant PROPOSED USE single-family_ residential • • COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN COMMENTS Located on the south side of NE 12th Street, west of Aberdeen Ave NE ' • T ''M CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) APPLICATION NO(S): ECF;PP-116-90 PROPONENT: Woodland Investments PROJECT NAME: West View Addition Preliminary Plat DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant seeks to create a 12 lot preliminary plat, to permit future development of single-family residences, and two tract lots on a 3.68 acre property. The proposed residential parcels will range in size from 7223 sq.ft.to 10,939 sq.ft. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: South side of NE 12th Street,west of Aberdeen Avenue NE. LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Development Planning Section The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required , under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). Conditions were imposed as mitigation measures by the Environmental Review Committee under their authority of Section 4-6-6 Renton Municipal Code (see attached sheet). These conditions are necessary to mitigate environmental impacts Identified during the environmental review process. This Determination of Non-Significance -Mitigated (DNS-M) is Issued under WAC 197-11-340(2). Because mitigation measures have been Imposed,the lead agency will not act on this proposal for fifteen (15)'days from April 29, 1991. Any interested party may submit written comments which must be submitted by 5:00 p.m., May 14, 1991, in order to be considered. A fourteen (14) day appeal period will commence following, the finalization of the DNS-M. Responsible Official: Environmental Review Committee c/o Don Erickson, Secretary - Development Planning Section Department of Planning/Building/Public Works 200 Mill Avenue South Renton,WA 98055 PUBLICATION DATE: April 29, 1991 DATE OF DECISION: April 24, 1991 SIGNATURES: !A 1 LJ `l 1 2� q l Lynn A. ITttma ` ,Administrator DAT Depart - t of P anning/Building/Public Works oAtiv._ E_ U.) 2 /1 Joh Webley,Administrator D E Corr unity Service Department .G --t., it-c:,;2-/—?/' Lee er, Fire Chief DATE Ren n Fire Department OP 410 mllslg 1110 DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED MITIGATION MEASURES PROJECT: West View Addition Preliminary Plat PROPONENT: Woodland Investments APPLICATION NUMBER: ECF;PP-116-90 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant seeks to create a 12 lot preliminary plat, to permit future development of single-family residences, and two tract lots on a 3.68 acre property. The proposed residential parcels will range in size from 7223 sq.ft.to 10,939 sq.ft. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: South side of NE 12'h Street,west of Aberdeen Avenue NE CONDITIONS: The Environmental Review Committee Issued a Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated with the following conditions: 1. The applicant shall, In order to ensure that the significant trees on the project site are retained, provide a Native Growth Protection Easement for the slope area and the significant trees outside of the building pad area and road right-of-way. This easement shall be prepared to the satisfaction of the Development Planning Section and the City Attorney and recorded at the time the Final Plat is recorded. 2. The applicant shall, In order to ensure that Tracts A, B,and C are not sold In the future as buildable lots, record a covenant in perpetuity dedicating Tract A, B and C as native vegetation and open space lots. The covenant shall also state that title to Tract A shall conveyed with the title to Lot 12 and that the title to Tract B will be conveyed with Lot 11 and title to Tract C shall be conveyed with Lot 10 in perpetuity. This covenant shall be prepared to the satisfaction of the City Attorney and recorded at the time the Final Plat is recorded. 3. The applicant shall prepare an amended preliminary plat map providing three tract lots, replacing Tract A, to the satisfaction of the Development Planning Section prior to the public•hearing by the Hearing Examiner. 4. The applicant shall, in order to mitigate on-site and regional recreation Impacts, review the Parks Comprehensive Plan and the proposed Master Trail Plan with the Parks Section of the Community Services Department to determine the impacts, if any, of the proposed development on regional recreation facilities. The applicant shall provide: a) a voluntary contribution of $1,800 ($150.00 X 12 Lots) to the Parks And Recreation Fund with the fee to be paid prior to the recording of the Final Plat; OR b) an alternate plan for completion and improvement of on-site recreation facilities within one of the buildable lots. The plan for on-site recreation would need to be approved by the Development Planning Section and the Parks and Recreation Division prior to the recording of the Final Plat. 5. The applicant shall, to ensure that construction follows the guidelines established by the geotechnic investigation, record the following language on the face of the plat. A minimum building setback of twenty-five feet (25') from the top-of-slope shall be ' provided except for wood decks which shall provide a minimum ten foot (10') setback from the top of slope for Lots 9, 10, 11 and 12. The setback are shall not be used for placement or storage of fill materials, including "temporary"excavation spoils from the building area preparation and excavation. • Any development or encroachment into the setback area should be evaluated by a specific geotechnic investigation. Reduction of setback is possible only after the geotechnic investigation and approval by the City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works. The geotechnic report shall be submitted to the. satisfaction of the City of Renton Planning/Building/Public Works Department prior to the issuance of any site preparation permits. mitmeas-1 Existing loose fill In the setback area shall be removed and natural vegetation provided in this area. Landscape plans shall be submitted to the satisfaction of the Development Services Division of the Department of Planning/Building/Public Works prior to the issuance of any site preparation permits. Storm runoff from the Development shall be diverted away from the slope and not allowed to saturate the foundation area of the homes on Lots 9, 10, 11,and 12. 6. The applicant shall provide a covenant which establishes a Homeowners' Association, to be responsible for maintenance of all common areas and facilities (e.g. storm drainage system, fencing,Tract X)with the Association to be in force and effect for the life of the project (including a stipulation that the City, at the Citys' discretion, may be permitted to enter onto the site for maintenance if the Homeowners' fall in the task, with the financial responsibility to be borne by the Association). The Association is to be developed by a covenant,and described on the face of the plat, with both of these documents to be approved by the Planning/Building/Public Works Department and the City Attorney prior to the recording of the final plat with King County. Notes: At the time of the review of the preliminary plat before the Hearing Examiner, staff will make recommendations, including, but not limited to the following items: The applicant shall record note on the face of the final plat Indicating that a six foot sight obscuring 'wood fence or masonary wall shall be required along the east boundary of the development and the back of Lots 2,3, 7, 8,9,and 10. mitmeas-2 I. L,Al II1 _..... _ - -- 2. Mr . • 0 3. Water • ' 4. Plants • • 5. Animals • . 6. Energy&Natural Resources ' 7. Environmental Health • 1 • 8. . Land &Shoreline Use ' 9. Housing • 10. Aesthetics 11•. Light&Glare • • • • • • 12. Recreation • 1 ' 13. Historic&Cultural Preservation • • 14. Transportation ' 15. Public Services . 16. Utilities COMMENTS: t Ae,v-Of � J 7/".24 .G4 �``�-'�,�. `e _Jr ,ea,o4Li yeete--4-4,9-0-, . . w,j2_ a.AL ).p.A.4.4.... 76 A.4.t.,,i (3?ki.ot We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas In which we have expertise and have Identified areas of probable Impact or areas where additional Information is needed to properly assess this proposal. ` g,- Z7-- `O Sign ire of Director or Authorized Representative Date • Rev. 6/88 envlvchl .. • .... .----—• 1 •• IV:�1'UIJ114'a701 YItiQ7. - - • 16. Utilities • 0 . COMMENTS: Ar_....19-,-- --)------''''''''(--- �Zi�'(--,,.lr!-•/.....J„� ,.� ? •.,. • '-v-,e..e-,"--r...4.:...:) , r . -- _. ,. • „s V►1'.' ' 7 ' ���^�•t••- �, /xiy�✓�•. .�•e.'���.//,t..G�1_.:�. / .�:�_ -c)�• ,1 r.. r,.a.f,r r...,,,,,,,e_...7.4.,—. ..-._746 „,---tiii...,..... ..„..4--Le4.---x-,r--.1.--.1...,..../..4------..‘-' , 't.. f.2o• vyyL�' 'L , ..-a..e, �r.• /,0,v J6•a-•••,N�. . 4.4.----,S 7 - . i'/,mot P r(;f ..(-2 j ,f ,' . )4,..!t..--)„....4.,, ' • • • • We have reviewed this application with particular attention.to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of pro ble Impact or areas where additional Information is needed to properly assess this proposal. /6 -9'd. S ature of DI ector or Authorized Representative Date • Rev. 6/88 FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMEN 1 '''' ! DEVELOPMENT SERVICES,DIVISION CONSTRUCTION FIELD SERVICES • y • DEVELOPMENT PLANNING I . PLANNING &TECHNICAL SERVICES • • . PARKS AND RECREATION DIVISION OTHERS: • • COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5:00 P.M. ON OCTOBER 12, 1990. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: S 1 - APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS • NOT APPROVED /%- a",- • r--e . . .�j�1 Z�Gcei., 1 . , .. 0 ,,t,,,,,,,Ni- x__: , ,,,_,,.„__ 19-6- -A-- , • I d 11 q . . ria2f. •• p.. -�'"� DATE: ! .� `7• SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE l REV. 5/90 devrvehl • . ' • REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: 9r0gPI ,' APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS X NOT APPROVED• I' . The , s. -fro fl rn, , j.ro Vitt0, A.c 1-1 rk.01 And re-r►ipa✓'av y. Crosi.'o� • ' �41r 1••�-�010.0: (fro,1• ► P1dY( hail. ' 12 . desy 1, ��r1, 'a cc tedgP1ce • al, with , l4 o Kim Coue y Svr ci ct Wech r .Des 21 M q.yl,14 ro, 'o' r•e u"'verA 0 .�'ddld-roiAJ ` Ial?ed stoyervl.ov.$ etre_q • 2� Qico Fr �� �i �i Stia I I ��� � � 4 ex�edS 5 O O Pq, Ff. . 3.. , DP/`f,d_r o r ,S yf 1 e,-►1 I'S no'4 g l)o t,✓ed i 1 C 0-y .o w,►'�a(r ill A seP arG le -braa-l. i n • 110.5 r lai- ► 1 y be de-diealee( �o►- d01e117or 1 ' • • 1 • /006. 1'" I fAyl, I, DATE: • ' • SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE I • Ili REV.5/90 1 . :devMhl . 1"II11: l',iLV L,4 I IUI4 1)Ui uu_, U POLICE DEPARTMENT M Ilk . DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION CONSTRUCTION FIELD SERVICES • DEVELOPMENT PLANNING . PLANNING'&TECHNICAL SERVICES • PARKS AND RECREATION DIVISION • OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION ON BY 5 00 P.M.BE PROVIDED OC70BER WRITING. `12, PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING 1990. • REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: • . APPROVED . APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED Co c tl ht`°F`wa� irnfrovery,,,,elf 5/i411 he re�v:reG�a � F�IIy de.vQlopn�e►�� p�b�l � � ullll}�iPs And 1 / rpm Sho�✓I'� RjI X Applicant. Shalt So brhii DI ,�(1°S ► I f r' II (, Y S!'�ow Iv S'J o r►1 and Selilii a r/ S•c.w crs/ S 12..e 2 2 �C 3 I / J proF��2 0� ,S'epara•'Iort1' ctrC n.� ; all Cro3s:7/ And -f hat min i r►wevi I • ��l/ S`lor►n ii nd Sewer- -- •S ` Wei II go wq 11 � �o wall , � g '',vtrlrca I� InI'.r-►uv''1 Se Wer and wader. � f n wall � W A -kr 4 r1 cl J+o r4-1 — 7'S ' ' "id(I( f o w A 1• SanI +4ry Se-we,- rriG :✓I I S g I n C 4(1�/ w n S ✓tu w) it MI'nlrn�r�elydlZ� o �S�� �� be 5Ze $abs4a►�d nna Ir, [ .l i qr Se werro�fiPl • I he.r A I-I e/ YI ct 17 VIL xR l�q v l t I.1- : I'Cgn� 5 OJ1 InveS1.�Ak 1o�.I�.. I y ' q �/ X .s.'gym ad.c- 1 iioc ,r. r yeil'y c'fl fl ,- biQ fe rv✓ . b,1 U V2rlFrCq�lo� I I I • • 1Pg..1q- . . 'Asa*. Asa evId ""` DATE: SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 5/90 devrvshl REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: ePli 01,K3Wit. • / NOT APPROVED APPROVED • V APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS 4• A.. • •ems, , (?)111)2111 .Q._fr,-,N., 6-.A. (;_A).11.3LQ-,(saJ;!L- .. .. -st e___ . l)- a. Q "A) 1)-4\ Try .ems • a in a kA (1,1/4_6-cc LL.Ste_csr;-.0 4-0 . _,Lftri( ) 1 . ...„ 6 coourv, ov.. Dtft, FC15-(1/4--, 1,-t-o-a4-t, ct-M `6\A-w'u'l eAsvv--Z164 DATE: /6 1/ .' l U SIGNATURE F DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 5/90 -- DEPARTM'} "1T OF PLANNING BUILDING Pl;' I IC WORKS PLANNING t!IVISION CITY OF It IJIc,•1 ENRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET OCT lECEIVED 1 2 "1990 • RE IEWING DEPARTMENT: f•�o1VI1C.C� • DATE CIRCULATED: 9/27/90 COMMENTS DUE: 10/12/90 ECF-116-90 • APPLICATION.NO(S): PP;RVMP-116-90 PROPONENT: John Krehblel/Woodland Investments PROJECT TITLE: West View Addition • • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:. A preliminary plat to subdivide 3.68 acres Into 12 single-family home lots., •LOCATION: NE corner of SR 405 and.Sunset Blvd (approx. 1800 NE 12th) • SITE AREA: 3.68 • BUILDING AREA (gross): N/A IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS: PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR •MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY • 1. Earth • 2. Air . 3. Water • 4. Plants • 5. Animals . • 6. • Energy&Natural Resources 7, Environmental Health 8. Land &Shoreline Use • • 9. • Housing S • • 10. Aesthetics • 11. Light &Glare 12. Recreation • 13. Historic&Cultural Preservation 14. Transportation • 15. PublIc Services 16. Utilities • COMMENTS: p� Jjc9, hadut, �' r`� l CQ.t�S ,V .) 4 ' •. We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have Identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional Information Is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Directoip6r AutWized Representative Date • Rev. 6/88 .. • is I 41i enwvwht 10, Aesthetics .0 11; Licht & GInro _---�_—_- 12. Recreation 13. Historic& Cultural Preservation 14. Transportation 15. Public Services • 16. Utilities Gam_ COMMENTS: —T (M • We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas In which"we have expertise and have Identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional Information Is needed to properly assess this proposal. OC /o / 2 Signature of Director or Authorized Representa e • Date Rev. 6/88 • .nvrvshl • REVIEW COMMENTS PRELIMINARY PLAT(NE 12TH ST. &KENNEWICK) 4Pp7-0 d-f 1145'-k. JOHN KEHBIEL • Oct. 10, 1990 • 1. NE 12th St. roadway improvements to provide: • o Curb, gutters, sidewalk and Street lighting. • 2) Provide street light drawing for cul-de-sac roadway. • • • • • • DEPARTMATOF PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS • • DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET • ' ECF-116-90 • APPLICATION NO(S).: PP;RVMP-116-90 PROPONENT: John Krehblel/Woodland Investments PROJECT TITLE: West View Addition • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: A preliminary plat to subdivide 3.68 acres Into 12 single- family home lots. • LOCATION: SEC: 8 TWNSHP: 23N RNG: 5E NE corner of SR 405 pnd Sunset Blvd (approx. 1800 NE • 12th) TO: • • PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION SCHEDULED TAC DATE: 10/19/90 ENGINEERING SECTION TRAFFIC ENG. SECTION • UTILITIES ENG. SECTION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU . • POLICE DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION • CONSTRUCTION FIELD SERVICES • • DEVELOPMENT PLANNING • • • PLANNING &TECHNICAL SERVICES • PARKS AND'RECREATION DIVISION • OTHERS: ' COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING.' PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS.TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5:00 P.M.' ON OCTOBER; 12, 1990.. • I REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: • fr _ iCl.JC4.+tM- 'I, • • APPROVED £— PROVED WITH CONDITIONS . . • NOT APPROVED • Any development and/or construction shall comply with current Fire and Building Codes and Ordi- nances., ' A eemiad means of approved access is required. Fire Department access roads/lanes shall be paved minimum width 20'; minimum height 13' 6". Yes v'"No . Preliminary fire flow calculations show a fire flow of /; Utro is required. / hydrants with a minimum flow of /, rrre gpm each is required. Primary. hydrant is required to be within soo • feet of the structure. Secondary hydrants are required to be wi thin /ti s, feet of the structure. `"1-'41�+u .:► „�.,�,,�,,. �,G a«�- .�'� Goo Aiztti An approved automatic sprinkler system is required to protect the total structure. Yes No All fire department access roads are to be paved and installed prior to construction. Yes No All fire fire hydrants are required to be installed and approved prior to construction. Yes No i DATE: 4,4 ,?> /j9V. SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV.5/90 DEPARTMENT LANNING/BUILUItquJVUUL►l1 DEVELOP ENT APPLICATION REVIEW S I-a . . :APPLICATION NO(S).: PP;RVMP-116-90 ECF-116-90 . • PROPONENT: John Krehblel/Woodland Investments • PROJECT TITLE: ' West View Addition • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: • A preliminary plat to subdivide 3.68 acres Into 12 single- . family home lots. ; LOCATION: , ' SEC: 8 TWNSHP: 23N RNG: 5E. (approx. 1800 NE NE corner of SR 405 and Sunset'Blvd 12th) • TO: • PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION SCHEDULED TAG DATE:.10/19/90 ENGINEERING SECTION • • TRAFFIC ENG. SECTION • UTILITIES ENG. SECTION .. FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU • • POLICE DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION CONSTRUCTION FIELD SERVICES • DEVELOPMENT PLANNING •. •r PLANNING &TECHNICAL SERVICES •• ,i _PARKS AND'RECREATION DIVISION OTHERS: ' 5 _ GGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. • COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS ' . PLEASE PROVIDE • . COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5:00 P.M. ON OCTOBER � ' 1990. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: V�-! • NOT APPROVED _APPROVED • • _APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS x se arAte le Fy ,vqier �ain i+ l PrpVevtCviS R Va Pjk�seonJ reAUrcIN.,,, S II cMto(,� 3-o cd, or g614,�oy. .5�A,1da ^d s o' ,,e.rcIPe ��� ,,sio>1 � sy � I1t clS, l � .tin/, -I c rrig,- r,;v i rn f rov tw,,,,& art reryU;r`° .b`' npf I ir►, .FcGj �o I�P (oIInW 1� . , r,istGll'a.1'1'm� of g-�i'hc.l�. wa-�ev.$►,a10. oh ne-J1'y dlcdda'Fco( if I Qs sh�.✓h on Iorel ,►;►,inolvy� pla'� IO�anJ InSf�Qlla+ion op Pre I-I��drA✓+�' / 1 • qnJ DoMt.sl-i L 14/A+er Strv►ceS as re,uir'eG( , s�S�r•+� p�cv{tot h-�Gv,�"' �trceS /.�c✓'!F:• 1 1.,''' x• . s�g��c�f •I�� qll A 1�C4bI� � . � I! , I �' AFfAG6o1 're ks. 1 heV1�'W•Sh J hA DATE: 1n 1Z �0 SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE 5 90 . REV. / deavehl " __— ___ _cF__, _.. .y u. rr..•.a'r'.1v...N,...ee a.:r1wsurw,V,;tRY^"^""""• . O' E APPLICATION: fl, DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW �,r . .I ENVIRONMENTAL CIIECKLIST REVIEW s,iEET ..' Cl PLAN REVIEW ROUTING SLIP •� ❑ •• OTHER DATE: /446- o APPLICANT: f (� — � 'ai , NA ADDRESS: ; C�` d c~,S D .X1'144)- .� � Rol. /rDi YID !Z7") NATURE OF WORK: O 1G{ PROPERTY MANAGEME T /17//L"l D , DATE RECEIVED Commentsbue BY PROP RTY MGMT. , Comments or suggestions regarding this application should be provided in writing: Please provide comments to the Comm.Dev. Dept. (C.D.D.)by 5:00 p.m.on above date. • REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION )-ktd,,,,,A,4,,z.bt-- EciES APPLIED CANNOT APPLY ES ❑ EGAL DESCRIPTION NEED MORE INFORMATION ❑ SQUARE FOOTAGE • D FRONT FOOTAGE . ❑ VICINITY MAP • • It is the Intent of this development fee analysis to put the developer/owner on notice,that the fees quoted below will apply to the subject site upon development of the property. All quoted fees are due and payable at the time'the construction penult is Issued to install the on-site and off-site improvements (i.e. underground utilities,street improvements,etc.) PROJECT COST LATECOMER LATECOMER AGREEMENT-WATER NO. PER. FTG. FEE CITY HELD —0 ,I PRIVATE DEVELOPER HELD •• —^ 0— 1, LATECOMERS AGREEMENT-SEWER ' CITY HELD © -• PRIVATE DEVELOPER HELD o SPECIAL UTILITY CONNECTION CHARGE-WATER • UNITS SUCC FEE Single family residential dwelling unit $940/lot x AP--' J f �� 1ls l , Apartment, Condo,each multiplex,unit $545/ea, unit x • Commercial/industrial $.126/sq,ft.of property x • (not less than $940.00) SPECIAL UTILITY CONNECTION CHARGE.-SEWER • Single family residential dwelling unit$470/lot x /L ,}. ' bD I Apartment, Condo,each multiplex unit $270/ea. unit x Z�'* D ,I Commercial/Industrial $.063/sq.ft.•of property x (not less than $470.00) . SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT(Hospital Area)WATER UNITS SAD FEE . Developments with 1500 'M Fire lows or Less: , Area Charge $0.034 i er ft.x , Frontage Charge $16.1 I per front ft. x Developments with Greater th 500 GPM Fire Flows: Area Charge $0.04 er q.ft.x , Frontage Charge 8.00 p•r front ft. x. 0 — SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT(Honey Crk, Intercptr)-SEWER UNITS SAD FEE • • Area Charges: • • Residential d elling unl , apartments or equlvalen ; $25'.per dwelling unit x ' Commercial dev op ent: $.05 per sq, ft.of . oss site area x Front Footage Charges: • . $37.19 per Fry t Ft. n ea. side) x , $74.38 per P .Ft. (prpt on both sides of imprv.) x -- 0 TOTAL: $ /61 ' Ci. D O The above quoted fees do NOT Include inipeitIUn tees, sldo *YWul•puiii Its, r/W puin1It IYY.Or the coil of walur Meters. • /04 1gna1iir. of Director or Authorized Roprosentativ DATE /! 9D4 /b•.ynsspp/ I op CLO ! . W 2 W W 0 .SCALE I=200' w m T O .+. fu. R.O E i, 4�rN : ,fr. 1 1 LI : �J G::c' `d NE/GNBORHooD DETAIL HAP • \ d"d ? Q_. = PIE `c LEGEND -OP CDD MOT 0..N W. , 1♦ t k A ,, A /: . • . E• .. l2TH ST. h,tt' 0 ee 0 ❑' El ~ � o fir- PAR • • PIlDat,1E10tNL UUIO IUIIY[10116 °F J,u•• P.O.sox sea,WA D1072 QOM 04-12112 oTL.: /".Zoo' D..„,„ .s/'/.c5' g_i°y",Ilk WOODLACA ND INVESTMENTS 7-,Z-7.0 Ao.BOX 2257 NooDlNVlLL[,wAsmiNiTON f1071 NE.± SECT/OA,B ToWA✓S'/P 23 A/O,PTH IgANGE 5 z9757 1Vi11- ,zc1i•wi v rer/zAr op �� , /✓EST, V/EW npDIT/ON �90443 . - • . . . ,. - • - ',e;:404y. . . ,ir..:. . k - -t t-- / . - _ . , 1,••••:;,....: •:. ,i01-fs4:14A,.._ . zsAo k .,,,-,IAt.i .•4,41.7.1 etuls•p • , .41/.,/ ---——74—--11. ..•A sec.s.es-5 . • .4-4,le- fie: We Ziv$79,, sg t7-1-E' • //e . c.c. • J'. • .1 • sec 8- . "*'' ' 444....\.• \ 114 •PC '-a.t , P.oii . . . . ,, .- ,4! .\ i ‘• .1 --,-- - • , . •.• •>\ s 71 cAr , . . 1 AftlifihilARY.PLAT /6//7P . • ,,,, 1 \,, i , '•. ,,, ,. . • • • ‘.4‘...I '(ent)) s‘ i al 1 '--- , 1 % f., • -IL, • l • • 1, ''s 1 \ •1 • (7 97 Z) `‘. A,,r AA4E: War Yin,/APPirioll k. , 1 \ • . ., . , , 4 - . .. 0454114/0EVELO/V.I: .r.l.edi,/rAtudiEL • -oar] , x illeaDzilAT •WEsrm,emrs . 1, \ „s • • I . -‘, _.._744.0 . • AO..90X 9eS7 .... A. 1...... '11, 1, %, 17--1 . JA, I4000WYCLcE, AM, ,17,907t • , •••... •$.r.7-33,-extr , . . .„tics-.4,4, s . s s'':1. . .* • .. '‘.I . \ , % .., .z.q.4S. -. N ",-, ._, \ ...4.;__ 14,.,...i__I ..,.. i . 1 \-.. ..N•` \...1 I . .„ I 4.1.r-rio2. --- fi.00 ... t k • • - • (7694-)\ I ._ ,- 1 -,• •-• ,_ - -. , , , , -•• .. _ .4.- - ..a,, • ` , , Ago- •. • . • , . r• •% \ 1 1, ',-,1' -. filitAiThc: . ART Se,freA . „ ,, • , \\ ,.......„..........., ......1.74„‘Ari_41, \ ,s. \ s , \ ,z‘ \ L• 1. i __ .7;seC/10 canfRA,i Assoc. • s •• ... '... \ \ 8, s,cA :b.k., \, 14... ‘, 1 ;t `, ; itc.•S., \ \ • \ RO. Bac J96 . ••• • s7 „40.',.. s‘s s -.,, \ sss i.; `sj% \ 41\*. is' (91”)\• its • .‘s ze 4e „ . 1,, \ ..‘ s ••• ..., i A% •kis .2A' . . 3c..... , •>,„ > NOOPktes//LGC, u/r9 9,9 0 7Z. • 6 \ ‘, sf,,, '„ •„2. 4,'. \1^* \ \,. \ „ \ 112 \ N,7, \ , • \I ' -, •• , ••••.. ,S . 4,6-/25e -% % \ . \ s, \ \ . ss 1,11115 1 ,. ' 18'. 4).\• •-•.- R: .3 ,,_ -„ (8331) , _..s , •-..„ ,.. % . . __Ix, l',‘, . „4f ACC.R1 ..1.,8 AT.gcs • , '.-, . ‘‘ti- S: s „ • . _, -oo-44 •., \ . .... s , , • ! s‘ a.Pro.,, ,ils. Of COTS, iz . IC71.5'', ‘ \ I4 \ ' ‘k ‘,. \ 59- '1 s ' ---s', ..T._ - f - , , 21- - - '-, '', -.`,. • e/7*.) %. ', • t ' ,ca .4-. , . 5 r 0 1 : ZON/MS: A 7Z00 . . . \ 's - .-s.• - 4.4-1,--,-, ".• , ,, i t•I \ , /•• 1 , i , y ,;, firo,80SED LEE: ShVGLe f.4.,,pcY .fe-.2oe-,vr/.4z. / . , , r, • \ ' I -, , „' ' 5' i xi.Iffv.-14 ;..., e ,s ,' \' -6.-\ I ••• N. ‘,.. • • Aciter-81/716E of oxe-A.../.517fEEr: is.Syl ., • • N, (7z 2 3) •-.. Ls ..„ • ' ' 1 i / • ...-t . 0 e_..44110\}II 04' / • • \• I\ % IP 7,,,C_ , I ti I . : '. t 1 1 e 8 •Ii\ss,!' frl,"47...ketr""ne. N9, T; \''‘ • '• 0' . l't I o I - ....i.,-•• .:.'-----k•"4. •..si;e. . ..: A • .. ... • , . , \ . .•• .6. , •, .. --7—.,,i, .,,......„ ..... , . rs, , .... . . 0.... . . ..... . 41) . , . , ,...1 \z.:,. ,, ,i; ,....... ,,,,„. t, . •••- Su, ` "... s in. -1-4. n ., n. t.... 4., .\ . n, , :113... \ - , ;F ai:."3,Sji, ric) - . . .3.- , ‘ .‘, \ t ‘, >•,°731) \ '.....• . `.1, . °..,. s.+(i'• , . ,'' ,, ‘r_reivX ,, .... Ls.. \ \ i• ,....:".`' ‘‘, 4,5-. ''''''"2 ..%;lis i• - -"'"C‘`, ''''s 414? •. \ 1. ... ' ...-'\ ...t._ ' s 71 v •. 6 •,,,„.. ps t, : i -, .•, , •%T ..... •• (7L 93 ) . kl t0 ,,.:.,.. ..f.,ve:/1 41c. er• • • iS: . , ' V•ii \\ RESlikilTI'INS ki• ' 6 -0.>. /c.e.ec.5..42W.O/44.1 % -'.1.,`',1,‘ ,, •;#.4v, -• , , , • • , ',3' \ r. 0 x i • Parcel 1i 0} r ci,,..e• ,,,, d„,, .•7 -it'.,045-.7i, •••,,, I . ''' •••„. f 01) That portion ot the hellos sue •Iet...rlo....1 % (73 4 eV)L.11'1_,.fri , ' J.'.• •/0 •.15 O.- ... . '''.:‘ proliertv lyine.Smith,It of the N0,11 RY.11.1.01 .../...\:.. NI _ i , , ., L 4 1, 1 I., --.!-8r.30 -• \ 1,\.• I zy s, 2 "..-{• P 'a go 40 g 0 • • , , ,•;1, ‘..... , • . /......., . 5te.,_. luterolvingoi S 4111 a,enodonneJ In ItInN \ ,..;\ N. .,,,, i t 1,-I- County Superio.r C.1.1A1,SO. 65,17;1,. that portion of cite Northwest qusrter ol the iss ...1q4Y...//,.?192:2____ , % , , N , et ‘, k' I 4P Nurthes,r gnarl, .. So,I Ion h. fi.nosr•I p •I Ree/se0 ,c4..?. /•;4-,9/ \ % , • s I,. e '‘ ....4** •,5 .\••• b'. , ". '--9's--,-1,,, %, ''N:s-;.-. NN . I lift North. gauge S FA,r, ii.:I.. '.0 LI .-2...\-i-. ,e'EVISED 7/?,/. Z/,7/ . ..,, n. '.•• '••60 74-) s ',,,, , 7 ', N .'<,, • Washinitton. don..11.,..I oi foil 0014: ••••%•:',:;/\:c. "t \r" ' ( \1,, , . )., , ItuNIntiln di tho i)o•II,:NI.,ter rornes of .7.::•' . \I'•' (.1:''. •-- o ..' .•Id Sear lost di t:••.0,II$9-di-ii0 • ,,s , .. • 0•••• • along the North i toe or ....id ....I I.•I. \ •T''.. . , S, t5 je 70.k4 I oet to rile iktIE',mai CI- ...1.1!ININt. ."•:::.:''s cg‘ • • V 1 • 1 i 4 .,''' ''`.'• \ 46. • ifs •I al the tract Itoroid described; . ‘3` ,4S 0-1S-4S F 6'11.4; •••et; t hon.,::••••-li-27 , r I1 . 111‘,.... . ,4`...., • , 410.41 teor Si' the iosterIi itarein of rho •••,i''', ....IC, \ .. 'I \\ sq i , . Puitt Sound VOW,/ . LiAr 0,11,11,., ri.ght• . ; of-way; therm. S I,-0?-id i."Ions the ' 2.6. 4 . Easterly mariOn of the Pudor Sound Power 6 N' I/ ‘s‘ .*- ` Ar: .. Pf.,- . '• Light Company., rtiihr-,-,,,, :..i.tit feet; ' thence N 46-3S-27 C h05..,3 feet. 'hence T...*-.1'..—".. I:, , / N 6-3S-45 W Ilt•.91 leer In tl•e North I Inv . G• 1- ,. , rAfc r x %, of said Ser l 100 Hi its...••, ,to,..i.dl W Vg•\••' • ..'ores: ' V:) • ,/' . II i•.•..• ..:Id n,,,,,,,,. •att /) eV.I; R E. • .4,47/VG" 6o,...pr-H . /0.° . holgt I0 TUN 11411. POIN1 til of...:Iiiiiit• fol.... '": • e \ .."1 . ' • P,or eCrA9A/e.45 C/AsE,A17-- 40. ••••••c,,„. es • •t known 11f 0 norriot,of Nov 14,1t00 ;ii..e Site, ,,.no V.1,110.1. 0, rveorebt,! •• •••I•on.• I' 01 2)s-.4.4cr R.is .4,4,!C.A e. .0.-V.0 /.5 ro --"\-- !..—___. /•x 1, -,F, t •0 , 0 . PI.Illi, ifoge n. I. Ki.v•ouat?. li.,11Inston). 5,e ,vrr.4,cme0 ro /we ...-/re C. OF LOT /Z. 5E6.. ,/ • ,,„‘, • si r.e.sCT 5 /s A.' eV.C.,A7 E. AND if ro BC , • . ei 1,11.00 I 2: /4/. PAW . /I' 70 • , I'sec ..7 harries....r;lon too-. A 17:4C ten9 7-0 THE 7/TIC o" LOT //. ere- ,-4 uALLY ow•Ve Os‘.4)11, ... ?0,,,,,, arr,,,,ling 1...pint r.d.i•td•••• t: ',Ion.: 4)7X4'Cr C /5 .4 ner..P.cr. .4.4.9 ./S TO BE ,1,' ' /7"../.117.9/NCG itY LOT ‘ Arr.4c,velo re, 7/IC r/ree of zor /0. in,' eiumertr 4WD/Jr ,oo€ , 589-zs-fag ..., Wats, nd,e lh, III II.. •...no, • 1:'' 0-69/44 C C•"ii.tOSC.N........,..• W.,shl 5,,,,,; CXCCI•-• rle It nt it...11 h t•••- •-g).8SSZ • OWL 0/.46 S(r..84CA" .e/...Ve ar .4 s,r ., I,et •• •id tit trio,t I‘:ng,:ent • Yi) rAie sfS.17.4. "-AVM /VP Of sfAig/t" "tiLe C.,TS 9 TAX a /2- \x•° k -. • • :the Cast h 10 I ..e :7 fest thereto. /nAr If e-o ea aceD ,n4 TIE"9".....lot..IL OF THE c/rr or' Rewe-0,/ ,.,r,-,4 7-44"...0 t ,rnrrAL of ce-ore,C11.4//c RelbAT. •••,7 N,„,,, ... . •?,., e..*.••• ..,.., Wird - Siloam 6-aAmaciiiim •-•.- -— . N TRI2211004A1!....ttil 8,,',•••,1Y01111 N:-.... (;,,,!.•," • PA DO%SU w000NwLe,Wei SO/II ratd 4164111t ,....,., 1 r .c.,:,.;,,,,,+0,,, APPI•OVED NY . I::::' SIP .„.., • .. ,- * ..,.•, 1: ....if 1-14-.91 .."1/# irifelVIVEL . '-.. .-.,. ' . . /'44 dE,•I 5E977OI/6 rovoisAvp83,/a9)7/ /7,4waz" s eifs i - ,, ' . 4-14-9/ _5{m1444rAo 0 Nf1AW/v1w4?:4,.8 y/,I4d4,4 1.etiYPet cfi/zeArzr/.S OTdN rW OO A,:140WlI 'L'C';0 7PM 4"".YrO 0 7Z ...24 •••••••PIP.WM.011,01•••1•• . . . . • A(c # r 7 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION Dolores E . Ashbaugh ,being first duly sworn on oath states that he/she is the Chief Clerk of the VALLEY DAILY NEWS • Kent Edition • Renton Edition • Auburn Edition Daily newspapers published six (6) times a week. That said newspapers NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING are legal newspapers and are now and have been for more than six RENTON HEARING EXAMINER monthsprior to the date ofpublication referred to, printed andpublished RENTON, WASHINGTON A Public Hearing will be held by the Ren- in the English language continually as daily newspapers in Kent, King ton Hearing Examiner at this regular meet- County, Washington. The Valley Daily News has been approved as a legal ing in the Council Chambers on the second flnewspaper byorder of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for June 25,o City Hall,t 9:00Ren an, Washington, on P g June 1991 at a.m. to consider the King County. following petitions: WEST VIEW ADDITION PRELIMINARY PLAT The notice in the exact form attached, was published in the Kent Edition ECF:PP-116-90 XX , Renton Edition XX , Auburn Edition XX , (and not in The applicant seeks to create a 12 lot su lement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers meatpreliminarysingle-family plat, permites future develop- supplement PP g y meet of residences, and four during the below stated period. The annexed notice a public! n n t i rp, tract lots on a 3.68 acre property. The pro- posed residential parcels will range in size from 7223 sq. ft. to 10,939 sq. ft. The pro- #5 9 0 8 — City of R P n t o n,n n t i r•P nf p n h 1 i n h e a r i n g ject site is located on the south side of NE 12th Street, west of Aberdeen Ave. N.E. was published on June 13 . 1991 Legal descriptions of the files noted above are on file in the Development Ser- vices Division, Third Floor, Municipal Build- ing, Renton. The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the All interested persons to said petitions are invited to be present at the Public Hear- sum of$ 3 4 . 9 7 ing on June 25, 1991 at 9:00 a.m. to express their opinions. Published in the Valley Daily News June 13, 1991. 5908. Subscribed and sworn before me this 3 5 t h day of J u n c 19 91 QCd• • Notary blic for the State of Washington residing at Auburn, King County, Washington VDN#87 Revised 4/89 - NOTICE TO ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON HEARING EXAMINER RENTON, WASHINGTON A Public Hearing will be held by the Renton Hearing Examiner at his regular meeting in the Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall, Renton, Washington, on June 25, 1991 at 9:00 a.m.to consider the following petitions: WEST VIEW ADDITION PRELIMINARY PLAT ECF;PP-116-90 The applicant seeks to create a 12 lot preliminary plat, to permit future development of single-family residences, and four tract lots on a 3.68 acre property. The proposed residential parcels will range in size from 7223 sq. ft. to 10,939 sq. ft. The project site is located on the south side of NE 12th Street,west of Aberdeen Ave. NE. Legal descriptions of the files noted above are on file in the Development Services Division, Third Floor, Municipal Building, Renton. All interested persons to said petitions are invited to be present at the Public Hearing on June 25, 1991 at 9:00 a.m.to express their opinions. . w W W NE , EH H ��; o d d a-. - ..ti le EriP, Di ED it /� ° ❑ ✓ _hex )-- CITE a_ .JOF RENTON Ammar . Planning/Building/Public Works Department Earl Clymer, Mayor Lynn Guttman,Administrator June 11, 1991 John Krehbiel c/o Woodland Investments PO Box 2257 Woodinville,WA 98072 SUBJECT: West View Addition Preliminary Plat ECF;PP-116-90 Dear Mr. Krehbiel: The date of Tuesday, June 25, 1991, at 9:00 a.m., has been set for a preliminary plat public hearing to review the above-referenced matter. The hearing, before Mr. Fred Kaufman, Renton Hearing Examiner, will be held in the Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall, Renton,Washington. The applicant or representative(s) of the applicant is required to be present at the public hearing. A copy of the staff report will be mailed to you one week before the hearing. If' you prefer to make other arrangements to receive the staff report, please contact Kathleen Childers,277-5582,or Sandi Seeger,277- 5581. If you have any questions, please call 235-2550. cerely, 44411ik* Donald K. Erickson,AICP Zoning Administrator cc: Patty Akens Nelson&Wm. F.Akens, Jr. 1800 Mill Creek Rd, #1A Mill Creek,WA 98012 Lily K. Backman c/o Maverick Realty ATTN: Mary Gustine 212 Wells Ave S Renton,WA 98055 • hexttr/DKE/kae • 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON HEARING EXAMINER RENTON,WASHINGTON A Public Hearing will be held by the Renton Hearing Examiner at his regular meeting in the Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall, Renton,Washington, on June 25, 1991 at 9:00 a.m.to consider the following petitions: WEST VIEW ADDITION PRELIMINARY PLAT ECF;PP-116-90 The applicant seeks to create a 12 lot preliminary plat, to permit future development of single-family residences, and four tract lots on a 3.68 acre property. The proposed residential parcels will range In size from 7223 sq. ft. to 10,939 sq. ft. The project site is located on the south side of NE 12th Street,west of Aberdeen Ave. NE. Legal descriptions of the files noted above are on file in the Development Services Division, Third Floor, Municipal Building, Renton. All interested persons to said petitions are invited to be present at the Public Hearing on June 25, 1991 at 9:00 a.m.to express their opinions. Publication Date: June 13, 1991 Account No.51067 • hexpub OF RED ' I i • t " i TICE , ... . .,, 0447-e0 SEP1Etl•0�P City of Renton Land Use Hearing Examiner will hold a , PUBLIC HEARING • in CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL ON JUNE 25, 1991 BEGINNING AT 9:OO A.M. P.M. • CONCERNING: . • WEST VIEW ADDITION PRELIMINARY PLAT • ECF;PP-116-90 . THE APPLICANT SEEKS TO CREATE A 12 LOT PRELIMINARY PLAT, • TO PERMIT FUTURE DEVELOPMENT OF SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCES, AND FOUR TRACT LOTS ON A 3.68 ACRE . PROPERTY. THE PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL PARCELS WILL RANGE IN SIZE FROM 7223 SQ. FT.TO 10,939 SQ. FT. t • 1 . . Ri; b;rr-r a.:-.:0 I O ti, d �' Qom, -o • i ' i :fl _ • • • \ l• sir 3E • III 4'F, \ t,o o. ;; •l:• t . N GENERAL LOCATION AND/OR ADDRESS: SOUTH SIDE OF NE 12TH STREET,WEST OF ABERDEEN AVE. NE. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CALL THE CITY OF RENTON PLANNING DIVISION 235-2550 THIS NOTICE NOT TO BE REMOVED WITHOUT hexpstr PROPER AUTHORIZATION CERTIFICATION I , IvIar 'I(\JPI& , HEREBY CERTIFY THAT 3 COPIES OF • THE ABOVE DOCUMENT WERE POSTED BY ME IN • 3 CONSPICUOUS of CIE,,VON OR NEARBY. THE DESCRIBED PROPERTY ON 6, -/,2 --5 J • ,eee C,PAET J.A ®,,,o® •,/4R-.0\SSIOIy &(j 1,,, 9' 1A'TEST. Subscribed and sworn to before me, a E � NOTAFlY Rv�• Watery Public, in and for the State of Washington res p �% PUBLIC re i i in , on the / ,SIGNED : u' , ila -y ;7. 9t; p'—d$y o G/, a *i*OP WASN##eee 44 1 )10 OF RF © O U 6 z NI c3TicE 0 . 09,o ro ,,, 09gT6'0 SEPZEto City of Renton Land Use Hearing Examiner will hold a PuBtle HEARING in CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS , CITY HALL ON JUNE 25, 1991 BEGINNING AT . 9:00 A.M. P.M. CONCERNING: WEST VIEW ADDITION PRELIMINARY PLAT ECF;PP-116-90 THE APPLICANT SEEKS TO CREATE A 12 LOT PRELIMINARY PLAT, TO PERMIT FUTURE DEVELOPMENT OF SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCES, AND ' FOUR TRACT LOTS ON A 3.68 ACRE PROPERTY. THE PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL PARCELS WILL RANGE IN SIZE FROM 7223 SQ. FT. TO 10,939 SQ. FT. ki W m , 'Ito il tricy+-4----' _____L__,.... _i„, Dm 0 ' I 121:-J'.31 a ((t Q t 'a ; 1 ! II ° ` ct Q 5:1 9 •• �] frr \ d U' 0 rn I I , ' .. ta e . ' •' Juno I Ili . • ir\>. s.7 GENERAL LOCATION AND/OR ADDRESS: SOUTH SIDE OF NE 12TH STREET, WEST OF ABERDEEN AVE. NE. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CALL THE CITY OF RENTON PLANNING DIVISION 235-2550 THIS NOTICE NOT TO BE REMOVED WITHOUT hexpslr PROPER AUTHORIZATION CITY OF RENTON Awatcf Planning/Bui] ,,g/Public WOrks Department Earl Clymer, Mayor - Lynn Guttman,Administrator May 17, 1991 • John Krehbiel c/o Woodland Investments PO Box 2257 Woodinville,WA 98072 - SUBJECT: West View Addition Preliminary Plat • ECF;PP-116-90 • Dear Mr. Krehbiel: This letter is to inform you that the comment period has ended for the Determination of Non-Significance- Mitigated for the above-referenced project. No comments were received. The Committee's determination is final and may be appealed to the City's Hearing Examiner no later than 5:00 p.m. on June 3, 1991. To appeal this Declaration, you must file your. appeal document with the hearing examiner within fourteen (14) days of the date the Declaration of Non-- Significance is final or the Declaration of Significance has been published in the official city newspaper. See City Code Section 4-6-23, RCW 43.21 C.075 and WAC 197-11-680 for further details. There shall be only one appeal of a Declaration of Non-Significance or Declaration of Significance, and if an appeal has already been filed, your appeal may be joined with the prior appeal for hearing or may be dismissed if the other appeal has already been heard. Any appeal must state clearly why the determination should be revised and must be accompanied by a non-refundable$75.00 filing fee. • If you have questions or desire clarification of the above, please call Mark Pywell at 235-2550. • nvironmental R ' o"Mee, Donald K. Erickson,AICP Secretary cc: Patty Akens Lily K. Backman Nelson&Wm. F.Akens, Jr. c/o Maverick Realty 1800 Mill Creek Rd, #1A ATTN: Mary Gustine Mill Creek,WA 98012 212 Wells Ave S Renton,WA 98055 strtapel/DKE/kac 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON,WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated for the following project(s) under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code. The following Applicant(s) have completed a mitigation process: West View Addition Preliminary Plat ECF;PP-116-90 The applicant seeks to create a 12 lot preliminary plat, to permit future development of single-family residences, and two tract lots on a 3.68 acre property. The proposed residential parcels will range in size from 7223 sq. ft. to 10,939 sq. ft. The project site is located on the south side of NE 12th Street,west of Aberdeen Ave. NE. Further information regarding this action is available in the Development Services Division, Third Floor, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington, 235-2550. This Determination is FINAL To appeal this Declaration,you must file your appeal document with the hearing examiner within fourteen (14) days of the date the Declaration of Non-significance is final or the Declaration of Significance has been published in the official city newspaper. See City Code Section 4-6-23, RCW 43.21 C.075 and WAC 197-11-680 for further details. There shall be only one appeal of a Declaration of Non-Significance or Declaration of Significance, and if an appeal has already been filed, your appeal may be joined with the prior appeal for hearing or may be dismissed if the other appeal has already been heard. This appeal period which will end at 5:00 p.m. on June 3, 1991. Any appeal of this decision may be made to the City's Hearing Examiner, Municipal Building, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, Washington 98055. An appeal must state clearly, in writing, why the Determination should be revised and must be accompanied by a non-refundable$75.00 filing fee. Publication Date: May 20, 1991 Account No.51067 • • pubnot • (kid: N uT I i ENVIRONMENTAL DECLARATION APPLICATION NO. FCF:PP-116-9f) PROPOSED ACTION. WEST VIEW ADDITION PRELIMINARY PLAT WOODLAND INVESTMENTS THE APPLICANT SEEKS TO CREATE A 12 LOT PRELIMINARY PLAT, TO PERMIT FUTURE DEVELOPMENT OF SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCES, • AND TWO TRACT LOTS ON A 3.68 ACRE PROPERTY. THE PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL PARCELS WILL RANGE IN SIZE FROM 7223 SQ. FT. TO 10,939 SQ. FT. GENERAL LOCATION AND OR ADDRESS SOUTH SIDE OF NE 12TH STREET, WEST OF ABERDEEN AVE. NE. POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (E.R.C.3 HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION ODOES ODES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT ❑WILL XJVILL NOT BE REQUIRED. THE CITY OF RENTON WILL NOT ACT ON THIS PROPOSAL FOR 16 DAYS FROM THE DATE BELOW. COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY AN APPEAL OF THE ABOVE DETERMINATION MAY BE FILED WITH THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER BY 5:00 P.M., JUNE 2, 1001 • FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON PLANNING DIVISION AT 235-2550. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION env - • CERTIFICATION _ I , M r 13 Sow e ( A. , HEREBY CERTIFY THAT 3 COPIES OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENT WERE POSTED BY ME IN .3 • CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON OR NEARBY THE DESCRIBED PROPERTY ON 5 I- 9I • ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a .. Notary Public, in and for the State of Washington residing in , on the ,SIGNED : .titAa`e ' day of // 1 i ' N OT c E ENVIRONMENTAL DECLARATION APPLICATION NO. ECF:PP-116-9(l PROPOSED ACTION WEST VIEW ADDITION PRELIMINARY PLAT WOODLAND INVESTMENTS THE APPLICANT SEEKS TO CREATE A 12 LOT PRELIMINARY PLAT, TO PERMIT FUTURE DEVELOPMENT OF SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCES, AND TWO TRACT LOTS ON A 3.68 ACRE PROPERTY. THE PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL PARCELS WILL RANGE IN SIZE FROM 7223 SQ. FT. TO 10,939 SQ. FT. GENERAL LOCATION AND OR ADDRESS SOUTH SIDE OF NE 12TH STREET, WEST OF ABERDEEN AVE. NE. POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE CE.R.C. ] HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION ODD ES NEDOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT ❑WILL XJVILL NOT BE REQUIRED. THE CITY OF RENTON WILL NOT ACT ON THIS PROPOSAL FOR 15 DAYS FROM THE DATE BELOW. COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY AN APPEAL OF THE ABOVE DETERMINATION MAY BE FILED WITH THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER BY 5:00 P.M., JUNE a, 1001 • FOR FURTHER' INFORMATION, CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON PLANNING DIVISION AT 2 3 5-2 5 5 0. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION envpslr mETRc • Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle . Exchange Building • 821 Second Ave. • Seattle,WA 98104-1598 May 9, 1991 • PLANNING DIVISION rl?Y OF RENTON MAY 1 3 1991 Environmental Review Committee ' c/o Donald Erickson, Secretary i �` ?,t Development Planning Section Department of Planning/Building/Public Works 200 Mill Avenue South Renton,. Washington 98055 Determination of Non-significance File No. : ECF;PP-116-90 Woodland Investments Dear Environmental Review Committee Metro staff has reviewed this proposal and anticipate's no significant impacts to water quality or to Metro's wastewater facilities or public transportation services. Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment. Sincerely, AL/' ' _ Gregory M. Bush, Manager Environmental Compliance Division GMB:pgg234 • Washington State Duane Berentson I Department of Transportation Secretary of Transportation District 1 15325 S.E.30th Place PLANNING DIVISION Bellevue,Washington 98007-6568 CITY OF RENTON (206)562-4000 MAY - 11991 DATE: April 30, 1991 RECIYED TO: Don Erickson, Chief, Current Planning Planning Division Public Works Department 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 r FROM: JAMES L. LUTZ, P.E. , Utilities/Developer Engineer Washington State Department of Transportation District 1 15325 SE 30th Place, MS 113 Bellevue, WA 98007-6597 This letter is in response to the Mitigated Determination's of Non-Significance and environmental checklists that we received from the City of Renton on April 30, 1991. X We have reviewed the subject documents and have determined that the traffic generated by these developments will not have a significant adverse impact upon any state highways. File No. SR No. ECF-116-90 900 ECF-028-91 900 Please contact Robert Eichelsdoerfer of my Developer Services section at PHONE: 562-4297, SCAN 638-4297, if you have any questions. 1460 4.4 ' CITri OF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works Department Earl Clymer, Mayor Lynn Guttman,Administrator April 26, 1991 John Krehbiel c/o Woodland Investments PO Box 2257 Woodinville,WA 98072 SUBJECT: West View Addition Preliminary Plat ECF;PP-116-90 Dear Mr. Krehbiel: This letter is written on behalf of the Environmental Review Committee and is to inform you that they have completed.their review of the environmental impacts of the above-referenced project. The Committee, on April 24, 1991, decided that your project may be issued a threshold Determination of Non-Significance- Mitigated with the following conditions: See enclosed Mitigation Measures document. Because the Environmental Review Committee imposed specific mitigation measures rather than issue a Determination of Significance, there is a required 15 day comment period during which comments are solicited from various agencies, jurisdictions or individuals (including the applicant) who may have an interest in the Committee's decision. The comment period will end May 14, 1991. Following the end of the comment period, the City will finalize its Determination unless comments received require a reevaluation. Following the finalization of the Determination,there is a required 14 day appeal period. WAC 197-11-660 states that the responsibility for implementation measures may be imposed upon an applicant only to the extent attributable to the identified adverse impacts of the imposed action. Since an environmental impact statement has not been prepared for this project,any mitigation measure established by the ERC not directly attributable to an identified adverse impact is deemed to be voluntarily accepted by the applicant. Staff urges you to contact the various City representatives, as appropriate, (e.g., the Public Works Division) as soon as possible,to obtain more information concerning specific mitigation elements recommended for this project, if you have specific questions. This information will assist you in planning for implementation of your project and will enable you to exercise your appeal rights more fully, if you choose to do so. In addition, by the end of the comment period, we should be able to establish a tentative public hearing date before the Hearing Examiner, should a public hearing be necessary. If you have any questions or desire clarification of the above, please call Mark Pywell or me at 235-2550. Fo a Environments vie Co ittee, Donald K. Erickson,AICP Secretary cc: Patty Akens Lily K. Backman Nelson&Wm. F.Akens, Jr. c/o Maverick Realty 1800 Mill Creek Rd, #1A ATTN: Mary Gustine Mill Creek,WA 98012 212 Wells Ave S Renton, WA 98055 ercdecsn/DKE/kac 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 -. I.T.Y `:':>` CURREN > . T. ::�:::�:>::>:: :::::: <:;::::;::::;;:::<;::;:::::::: .:.;:: :::.:: ;:.:.::. ..::.::.:::.:.:::.:::.DI...I S.ION:-:-:::::�:;:::::>:;�;:.::-:.;:-:-;;:.;...::.�::::::_: ::�::: :AF F :�<:»]::;:::::>,:;{;:' ::�::'::>:>:::::: ... -.IDAVI'h:;0);'.>:rSERVT_CE :: . . . :;:::,:>;;:-:;;: :::::::i: :i;:.>;:::::: :.>;:.;;..::.. .... . ..- ..:..:;.:BY..:MAT:LING.>::::::: < i: <»:: On the 26• day of �p� . 19 deposited in the mails It the United Stat s a se aled envelope containing clC;�,yyyi4h411171$ amt cilG tsts documents . This information was .sentto: . Name Representing • aft 41 1 . _ Mr. Paul Reitenbach, Chief, Community Planning Mr. Gregory M. Bush, Metro _ Department of Wildlife - - Ms. Gayle Kreitman, Department of Fisheries Mr.Joe Robels, Habitat Management Director Mr.James Lutz, Department of Transportation Mr.Jay Laughlin, City of Seattle Duwamish Tribal Office Muckleshoot Tribal Office D.L Lensegrav, Puget Power • (Signature of Sender) S'.. ..acier Sub cribed an�c�ses gicp to me this �o- day of 19 / ,,��0d� ET J,A�i�V // ,% QP �SION • ▪ tca NOTAgy yo% = Nota Pub c in and for the �▪ ; PUBUC ? Sta f Washington residing • FO •••:••• (�. therein. . Proj Bet Name -- Project Number „t CIT` OF RENTON ._ x �, Planning/Building/Public Works Department Earl Clymer, Mayor Lynn Guttman,Administrator • April 26, 1991 • Washington State = Department of Ecology =` Environmental Review Section Mail Stop PV-11 _ 1_ , Olympia,WA 98504 SUBJECT: Environmental Determinations = Transmitted herewith are copies of Environmental Determinations and Environmental Checklists for those projects reviewed by the Environmental Review Committee on April 24, 1991: DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED West View Addition Preliminary Plat ECF;PP-116-90 The applicant seeks to create a 12 lot preliminary plat, to permit future development of single-family residences, and two tract lots on a 3.68 acre property. -The proposed 3 :: residential parcels will range in size from 7223 sq. ft. to 10,939 sq. ft. The project site is located on the south side of NE 12th Street,west of Aberdeen Ave.NE. _ . The 15 day comment period for these projects will end on May 14, 1991. Following the end of the comment period, the City will finalize its Determination unless comments received require a reevaluation. Following the finalization of the Determination,there is a required 14 day appeal period. If you have questions, please call Mark Pywell or me at 235-2550. _ - __. _ For the Environmental Review Committee, _ • .._ P. . . - - Donald K. Erickson AI C - �: • _ - - .' . . . . .-: .__ - .. . ........:.:.. : -Secrets ::.•;.,::.:- .„_�,� - - �-�:-��;�::. ry - r P ul Reitenbach Chief, CommunityPlanning = Mr.Gregory M. Bush, Metro _ __ :. _ __ .. 9 ry -_:._ -Department of Wildlife - Ms. Gayle Kreitman, Department of Fisheries . Director - eco I tManagement - - R s"Habits- - Mr.Joe obe - - -- - - ems. Departmentof Transportation .-- - - -, .�: - . Mr.James Lutz - - - _P - - - Mr.Jay Laughlin, City of Seattle _ -m Duwamish Tribal Office = '.. _Muckleshoot Tribal Office • = _ _ - D.L Lensegrav, Puget Power agncynr/DKE/kac 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 • • • AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION 51067 Dawn Rieger ,being first duly sworn on oath states that he/she is the Chief Clerk of the VALLEY DAILY NEWS • --� -� • Kent Edition • Renton Edition • Auburn Edition _ �! 119rNigtfO DICE OF Daily newspapers published six (6) times a week. That said newspapers, ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION are legal newspapers and are now and have been for more than six ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE months prior to the date ofpublication referred to, printed andpublished RvironmeNTON,WASHINGTONlReview Committee The Environmental Review Committee in the English language continually as daily newspapers in Kent, King (ERC) has issued a Determination.of Non- County, Washington. The Valley Daily News has been approved as a legal Significance-Mitigated for the following pro- ject(s) under the authority of the Renton newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for Municipal Code. KingCounty. West View Addition Preliminary Plat ECF;PP-116-90 The applicant seeks to create a 12 lot The notice in the exact form attached, was published in the Kent Edition preliminary plat,to permit future Bevel- X , Renton Edition X , Auburn Edition X , (and not in _-opment of single-family residences, •supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers androtwo tract pts on a 3.68ntiacre PP g y prompt. The proposed residential par- during the below stated period. The annexed notice a cels will range in size from 7223 sq.ft. to 10,939 sq. ft. The project site is located on the south side of NE 12th Pbulic Notice + Street, west of Aberdeen Ave. N.E. This decision will be finalized in fifteen (15) days. Written comments received after was published on 4/30/91- 5:00 p.m., May 14, 1991 will not be consid- ered.A fourteen(14)day appeal period will • commence following the finalization of The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the • DNS M. The mitigation measures imposed Sum Of$ 0.00 (Published in error) i by the City of Renton's Environmental Review Committee are available at the Development Services Division.Third Floor, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington 98055. Phone:,235-2550. �. Published in the Valley Daily News on April 29, 1991. Acct. No. 51067. 5697 Subscribed and sworn before me this 13____day of May 19 91 ' • N y Public for the State of Washington residing at Auburn, • King County, Washington VDN#87 Revised 4/89 • ` I • AFFIDAVIT OF F PUBLICATION• 51067 Dawn Rieger ,being first duly sworn on oath states ! I G that he/she is the Chief Clerk of the VALLEY DAILY NEWS • Kent Edition • Renton Edition • Auburn Edition ;NOTICE Daily newspapers published six (6) times a week. That said newspapers ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION are legal newspapers and are now and have been for more than six ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTON months prior to the date of publication referred to, printed and published The Environmental Review Committee in the English language continually as daily newspapers in Kent, King (ERC) has issued a Determination of Non- County, Washington. The Valley Daily News has been approved as a legal Significance-Mitigated for the following pro- jects) under the authority of the Renton newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for Municipal Code. King County. West View Addition Preliminary Plat ECF;PP-116-90 The applicant seeks to create a 12 lot The notice in the exact form attached, was published in the Kent Edition -preliminary plat,to permit future devel- - X , Renton Edition X , Auburn Edition X , (and not in ' opment of single-family residences, supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers and ,two tractp lotspo on a 3.68ntiacre pp g y prompt. The proposed residential par- during the below stated period. The annexed notice a cels will range in size from 7223 sq.ft. to 10,939 sq. ft. The project site is • located on the south side of NE 12th Pbulic Notice Street, west of Aberdeen Ave. N.E. This decision will be finalized in fifteen 91 .(15) days. Written comments received after 4/30 was published on / , 5:00 p.m., May 14, 1991 will not be consid- ered. A fourteen(14)day appeal period will commence following the finalization of The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the DNS-M. The mitigation measures imposed 0.00 (Published in error) by the City of Renton's Environmental sum of$ r Review Committee are available at the 1 Development Services Division.Third Floor, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington 98055. Phone: 235-2550. Published in-the, Va�lllley Daily News on April 29,,1991. Acct?•No Si 7:a5697— • • Subscribed and sworn before me this 1' day of May 19 91 667 Not Public for the State of Washington residing at Auburn, King County, Washington VON 487 Revised 4/89 • i i AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION 51 0 &`7 Dawn Rieger ,being first duly sworn on oath states that he/she is .the Chief Clerk of the VALLEY DAILY NEWS 039 9k • Kent Edition • Renton Edition • Auburn Edition Daily newspapers published six (6) times a week. That said newspapers are legal newspapers and are now and have been for more than six . months prior to the date of publication referred to, printed and published - - _ - • in the English language continually as daily newspapers in Kent, King !� - County, Washington. The Valley Daily News has been approved as a legal k,No' TicEOF�, newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for ENVIRONMENT ILDEaTERMWgTION King County. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW CON MITTEE • The Environmental Review Committee The notice in the exact form attached, was published in the Kent Edition (ERC) has issued a Determination of Non- X , Renton Edition X , Auburn Edition X , (and not in Significance-Mitigated for the following pro- supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers Muns) under the authority of the Renton PP g y Municipal Code. during the below stated period. The annexed notice a f` West View Addition Preliminary Plat ECF;PP-116 90 The applicant seeks to create a 12 lot Public 'Notice (VN 5697) preliminary plat,to permit future devel--- oprnent ces, was published on 4/2 9/91 and two of single-family lotsaonlyar 3.68 nacre prompt. The proposed residential par- cels will range in size from 7223 sq.ft. • to 10,939 sq. ft. The project site is The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the - located on the south side of NE 12th 39.96 Street, west of Aberdeen Ave. Nei .E. Sum Of$ This decision will be finalized in fifteen (15) days. Written comments received after 5:00 p.m., May 14, 1991 will not be consid- ered. A fourteen(14)day appeal period will l�%Zj" 1 commence following the finalisation of DNS M. The mitigation measures imposed by the City of Renton's Environmental • • Review Committee are available at the Subscribed and sworn before me this 13 day of May 19 91 Development Services Division. Third Floor, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington 98055. Phone: 235-2550. Published in the Valley Daily News on April 29, 1991.;Acct."No .§11067•.-;5697 , —;.- 0 - ' ..:7;r"---4 : - ;) ' - - - • - N ry Public for the State of Washington residing at Auburn, • King County, Washington VDN#87 Revised 4/89 • NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION • ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated for the following project(s) under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code. West View Addition Preliminary Plat ECF;PP-116-90 The applicant seeks to create a 12 lot preliminary plat, to permit future development of single-family residences, and two tract lots on .a 3.68 acre property. The proposed residential parcels will range in size from 7223 sq. ft. to 10,939 sq. ft. The project site is located on the south side of NE 12th Street,west of Aberdeen Ave. NE. This decision will be finalized in fifteen (15) days. Written comments received after 5:00 p.m., May 14, 1991 will not be considered. A fourteen (14) day appeal period will commence following the finalization of DNS- M. The mitigation measures imposed by the City of Renton's Environmental Review Committee are available at the Development Services Division, Third Floor, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington 98055. Phone: 235-2550. Publication Date: April 29, 1991 Account No. 51067 • pubnot • 46. N OT C E ENVIRONMENTAL DECLARATION . APPLICATION NO. ECF;PP-116-90 • PROPOSED ACTION WEST VIEW ADDITION PRELIMINARY PLAT WOODLAND INVESTMENTS THE APPLICANT SEEKS TO CREATE A 12 LOT PRELIMINARY PLAT, TO PERMIT FUTURE DEVELOPMENT OF SINGLE-FAMILY' RESIDENCES, AND TWO TRACT LOTS ON A 3.68 ACRE PROPERTY. THE PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL PARCELS WILL RANGE IN SIZE FROM 7223 SQ. FT. TO 10,939 SQ. FT. • • GENERAL LOCATION AND OR ADDRESS SOUTH SIDE OF NE 12TH STREET,WEST OF ABERDEEN AVE. NE. POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE [E.R,C.) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DDOES UpOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE • ENVIRONMENT. AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT ❑WILL WILL NOT • BE REQUIRED. THE CITY OF RENTON WILL NOT ACT ON THIS PROPOSAL FOR 19 DAYS FROM THE DATE BELOW. • COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY MAY14 1991 AN APPEAL OF THE ABOVE DETERMINATION MAY BE FILED WITH THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER BY 5:00 R M., • FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON PLANNING DIVISION AT 235-2550. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION emp.tr • CERTIFICATION • I , trit � So. ve &. , HEREBY CERTIFY THAT 3 COPIES OF • THE ABOVE DOCUMENT WERE POSTED BY ME IN 3 CONSPICUOUS NNEW&N,OR NEARBY THE DESCRIBED PROPERTY ON 5= /- q/ e ove J.A s' u NOrARy dtICS6fg Subscribed and sworn to before me, a PUB C NBtarPublic, n and for the State of Washi gton • ,yam��' a: , on th a P SIGNED '1 air Awdeu •7 of F itt: g ,,f /4 '0.„��V ASH .•`�� NOTICE ENVIRONMENTAL DECLARATION APPLICATION NO. ECF;PP-116-90 PROPOSED ACTION WEST VIEW ADDITION PRELIMINARY PLAT WOODLAND INVESTMENTS THE APPLICANT SEEKS TO CREATE A 12 LOT PRELIMINARY PLAT, TO PERMIT FUTURE DEVELOPMENT OF SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCES, AND TWO TRACT LOTS ON A 3.68 ACRE PROPERTY. THE PROPOSED . RESIDENTIAL PARCELS.WILL RANGE IN SIZE FROM 7223 SQ. FT. TO 10,939 SQ. FT. GENERAL LOCATION AND OR ADDRESS SOUTH SIDE OF NE 12TH STREET, WEST OF ABERDEEN AVE. NE. POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE C E.R.C. ] HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION ❑DOES7OES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT DWILL IKWILL NOT BE REQUIRED. THE CITY OF RENTON WILL NOT ACT ON THIS PROPOSAL FOR 15 DAYS FROM THE DATE BELOW. COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY MAY 1k 1991 AN APPEAL OF THE ABOVE DETERMINATION MAY BE FILED WITH THE FIENTON HEARING EXAMINER BY 5:00 P.M., FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON PLANNING DIVISION AT 2 3 5-2 5 5 0. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION envpstr ' CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) APPLICATION NO(S): ECF;PP-116-90 PROPONENT: Woodland Investments PROJECT NAME: West View Addition Preliminary Plat DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant seeks to create a 12 lot preliminary plat, to permit future development of single-family residences, and two tract lots on a 3.68 acre property. The proposed residential parcels will range in size from 7223 sq.ft.to 10,939 sq.ft. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: South side of NE 12th Street,west of Aberdeen Avenue NE. LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Development Planning Section The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). Conditions were imposed as mitigation measures by the Environmental Review Committee under their authority of Section 4-6-6 Renton Municipal Code (see attached sheet). These conditions are necessary to mitigate environmental impacts identified during the environmental review process. This Determination of Non-Significance -Mitigated (DNS-M) is issued under WAC 197-11-340(2). Because mitigation measures have been imposed,the lead agency will not act on this proposal for fifteen (15) days from April 29, 1991. Any interested party may submit written comments which must be submitted by 5:00 p.m., May 14, 1991, in order to be considered. A fourteen (14) day appeal period will commence following the finalization of the DNS-M. Responsible Official: Environmental Review Committee c/o Don Erickson, Secretary Development Planning Section Department of Planning/Building/Public Works 200 Mill Avenue South Renton,WA 98055 PUBLICATION DATE: April 29, 1991 DATE OF DECISION: April 24, 1991 SIGNATURES: Aa d---Y-- -----"------- 9 1 Lynn A. 6 ttma ,Administrator IDAT Depart —t of P anning/Building/Public Works • 4tv‘ Joh Weble Administrator DA7 Y' Cori unity Service Department -•,z /--?/. Lee "er, Fire Chief DATE Ren n Fire Department mitsig DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED MITIGATION MEASURES PROJECT: West View Addition Preliminary Plat PROPONENT: Woodland Investments APPLICATION NUMBER: ECF;PP-116-90 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant seeks to create a 12 lot preliminary plat, to permit future development of single-family residences, and two tract lots on a 3.68 acre property. The proposed residential parcels will range in size from 7223 sq.ft.to 10,939 sq.ft. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: South side of NE 12'h Street,west of Aberdeen Avenue NE CONDITIONS: The Environmental Review Committee issued a Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated with the following conditions: 1. The applicant shall, in order to ensure that the significant trees on the project site are retained, provide a Native Growth Protection Easement for the slope area and the significant trees outside of the building pad area and road right-of-way. This easement shall be prepared to the satisfaction of the Development Planning Section and the City Attorney and recorded at the time the Final Plat is recorded. 2. The applicant shall, in order to ensure that Tracts A, B, and C are not sold in the future as buildable lots, record a covenant in perpetuity dedicating Tract A, B and C as native vegetation and open space lots. The covenant shall also state that title to Tract A shall conveyed with the title to Lot 12 and that the title to Tract B will be conveyed with Lot 11 and title to Tract C shall be conveyed with Lot 10 in perpetuity. This covenant shall be prepared to the satisfaction of the City Attorney and recorded at the time the Final Plat is recorded. 3. The applicant shall prepare an amended preliminary plat map providing three tract lots, replacing Tract A, to the satisfaction of the Development Planning Section prior to the public hearing by the Hearing Examiner. 4. The applicant shall, in order to mitigate on-site and regional recreation impacts, review the Parks Comprehensive Plan and the proposed Master Trail Plan with the Parks Section of the Community Services Department to determine the impacts, if any, of the proposed development on regional recreation facilities. The applicant shall provide: a) a voluntary contribution of $1,800 ($150.00 X 12 Lots) to the Parks And Recreation Fund with the fee to be paid prior to the recording of the Final Plat; OR • b) an alternate plan for completion and improvement of on-site recreation facilities within one of the buildable lots. The plan for on-site recreation would need to be approved by the Development Planning Section and the Parks and Recreation Division prior to the recording of the Final Plat. 5. The applicant shall, to ensure that construction follows the guidelines established by the geotechnic investigation, record the following language on the face of the plat. A minimum building setback of twenty-five feet (25') from the top-of-slope shall be provided except for wood decks which shall provide a minimum ten foot (10') setback from the top of slope for Lots 9, 10, 11 and 12. The setback are shall not be used for placement or storage of fill materials, including "temporary"excavation spoils from the building area preparation and excavation. Any development or encroachment into the setback area should be evaluated by a specific geotechnic investigation. Reduction of setback is possible only after the geotechnic investigation and approval by the City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works. The geotechnic report shall be submitted to the satisfaction of the City of Renton Planning/Building/Public Works Department prior to the issuance of any site preparation permits. mitmeas- 1 • Existing loose fill in the setback area shall be removed and natural vegetation provided in this area. Landscape plans shall be submitted to the satisfaction of the Development Services Division of the Department of Planning/Building/Public Works prior to the issuance of any site preparation permits. Storm runoff from the Development shall be diverted away from the slope and not allowed to saturate the foundationarea of the homes on Lots 9, 10, 11,and 12. 6. The applicant shall provide a covenant which establishes a Homeowners' Association, to be responsible for maintenance of all common areas and facilities (e.g. storm drainage system, fencing,Tract X)with the Association to be in force and effect for the life of the project (including a stipulation that the City, at the Citys' discretion, may be permitted to enter onto the site for maintenance if the Homeowners' fail in the task, with the financial responsibility to be borne by the Association). The Association is to be developed by a covenant, and described on the face of the plat, with both of these documents to be approved by the Planning/Building/Public Works Department and the City Attorney prior to the recording of the final plat with King County. Notes: At the time of the review of the preliminary plat before the Hearing Examiner, staff will make recommendations, including, but not limited to the following items: The applicant shall record note on the face of the final plat indicating that a six foot sight obscuring wood fence or masonary wall shall be required along the east boundary of the development and the back of Lots 2,3, 7,8,9,and 10. • mitmeas-2 :::.>:<:;>;>:.>:::::: PAI TNI.. NT.OF.....LA.... ...IIV...• • •• ...........G.. '.. .... �.:.:.....::Q i....5:..::•:::::::::::::::::::: �� � �>� > . > ><:>` ::: ..N :' . ME 7. :�::FtEUIEW::.'>�. jMITI`E ....... .... . S � ...................................... ..................... ....... .. ...... .... ..... :... ....:........ iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii.ilillii.ililii!. >BA ":::::<:.i1. .::9..ND: ' `.' ' `imi > <> < � i ' < >` ' > < >' '> *<> � >' t": : :: «> ::�::::: ': >:>:: ::> . ..pLIG:.N7,.. ::........::.: .....:::.:......::::.......::..Waadla...d.(n...es.m.e...s..::.....:.•.:.......: ........:.............. ..... ...... :�: ::: : : «::: ..Fi � E''.:.�>:>`:>::>>;>:> ::::::>«:::> :>: :<:>:: :::< : : :::: ; :. t>V:v+:',.:....it '��ri:p:��limi'�a: .. . t..... ...... .:::::�. �J. G7,:. ::• ::: .::.:::.::.::•.::.: •:.:::.::•: :. Wes. ( . :Add io.::: e:: n. !Y:p.:a ::::::: : ::::::::. : ::: ENVIR. NMENTAL C E K jS;�,; ` < ;::;: Fgip. 14$9::;: < ? > :`<�? > ` �> � < ......IRON.... .�`A GH..C:.b 5 �GF,..F'....16.��....... ........ :;'t.. .I :+:�: :;;:;+;gll ..L :::;;:;: '>::>`i :ii':''�' i':<.>>:. :.:.:.:ate::;a i:2::lot I a . .. SC ff?7fON,aF• • aPC?SA. * ..:...... ••••—•:a•••••ca::,:seek;:::o::..:.:a: .:. :::::. ::::::P.;e:.;m••::•••;:••!.:R .:.: v m nt... i i . . u q f..m tw c e 6 C o ert ..wl .r :: i • • .. ................................. .............. ......... .... ... .......... ..... ........ • .i 10,9 .9. q •:::::: :>:: :: : :<::::::::.*::::::: >::::::::>::: �fN t ::: :::: >::>::::::L-:CA :IdN:::'••�::I'13 :f'::': Al; ::::: ::::> :<:::> : ��;:' v e s e s oG .ed.ori.....e. .Q.uth.$i...e.e......R.......h . ::::S.Ir•.eet ....est..a: ..be.deer:::.Ye;:N: ::::. *:,:*: R: :. : :: �••��i��N o se .. .::�S:.: $ : :: nth,. a� e: :e9:.:�: :.:.:.;:.,a:e.c.::Qn..::::Q:.s.::9,�10::..: r.::.::::. t'liti ::<:::::•::::: • ::• i•� t a 7 e.:: • . :.::.:::;:.; <.;:;:.>::.>.:; .:.»;:;::.>:.:::.>:. :.::.:.:<:«:.> <;.>::.:...L h a .d.G.....e .....a rrr..... . ...QSe...(Ges.11...... .s.............. ::<::<:>:::: ton : :�:>�: �tEGC�MN1ENpA710....S� S aff.:recarnm dk...a .:..0 �I::..:..:�a::. el:e mn.�::�.::::.:.:: .:: :<'fN��� � o see:::::: O S .<:::::: ;:> ::::>::>::>:«:>::::>::::::::>::>::::�:>: ::::>::::> <::::::::« : ::::::�:::>::::::::::>::::::::: o Ga Ge... . ed .w...h.G. ...dll. . . . ...... : , age: ,,r ,.0 ,.,�, . !—. • .. ®,;i/rfN.^::I inn ..!t .: i.f, ' ,1� • 1.(: ,,� 1 A ,,I ';' ' �' t I • . . n'' • . . 1• •4 l• •i• I „r' • I, • :7,......r'.a .,1.:f h ..ti I .Iis .!; ' fir • .. \ Jr, r rl s .,.' x l r 1 • i \'L✓ /° nct,lr., ' • .,., \ ilai • • ''r.a ;' rucr K- NIii I:— g ifc_, , . 1 p �i 4 e o I el j' 4 O,> �-y( D' bi ). r4� r�drSt4lir. o`* \�' �'�r9 Y I 1 1 nI P—&--10 ' k.Q n11�'iER IANGE. R1N REII1oN Id • ercrpt 1 Environmental Review ComruulLwe Staff Report - West View Addition Preliminary Plat April 24, 1991 Page 2 • ::8 �:::�:: ::HECQM.MENI�ATIC�.......................::::::::::::::::::::...........................:.:.:�:..::.�::::.:.:..:.:.::.::.•::...�..:.�::•:.::.>:.>;>:.:.:;:::•:::.;:.;:.::;;:.::.>:.::.;: Staff recommend that the ERC issue a Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated,with the following five conditions: Native Vegetation Protection 1. The applicant shall, in order to ensure that the significant trees on the project site are retained, provide a Native Growth Protection Easement for the slope area and the significant trees outside of the building pad area and road right-of-way. This easement shall be prepared to the satisfaction of the Development Planning Section and the City Attorney and recorded at the time the Final Plat is recorded. ,/2- /26 2. The applicant shall, in order to ensure that Tracts- and X are not sold in the future as buildable lots, record a covenant in perpetuity dedicating Tract A and X as native vegetation and open space lots. The covenant shall state that any unpaid taxes on egrorTract A or Tract X shall become liens on the other 12 lots. This covenant shall be prepared to the satisfaction of the City Attorney and recorded at the time the Final Plat is recorded eta G/yR.4 rt�Ti" by So'4( �`e' 7 /' E 3. The applicant shall, in order to ensure the replacement of significant trees'that may be removed by the future home owners, record a covenant with the following narrative: Trees having a diameter greater than eight (8) inches and more than_fffteerr 5) feet tside of the building envelope (measured from the edge of the_building or driveway to the unk of any tree) shall not be removed without a Routine-Vegetation Management Permit -sued by the City of Renton. In addition, any s of eight (8) inches or more in diameter sat are allowed to be removed with u a permit shall be replaced at the owner's exp•Ise at the following ratios: • For each - 12" caliper Al.- tree to be removed, two 2" caliper Norway Maple shall.be pia • •d. For each 12" or . •.ter caliper Alder tree to be removed, three 2" caliper Norway Maple shall be/p an •d. For each,(- 12" -calipe Douglas Fir to be removed three 6' 8' Douglas Fir shall be pla ted. F• each 12" or greater calipe 'ouglas Fir to be removed three 8' - 10' Douglas 'it shall be planted. S prep. ation wil •e in accordan e with Cit of Renton Tree PI ting Stand ds. All ree > be t. ed, •rtili •• and . ntain••• by an pro ed la sca e m en ce e ice or - mi of t ree •.rs from t e d. - of • an ' . All n rees sha be un er .rrant or a penis. • o years from e date of pi. tang. This covenant shall be prepared to the satisfaction sf the City Attorney and the Development Planning Section and recorded at the time the ' al Plat is recorded. Policy Nexus: Land Clearing and Tree Cutting Ordinance 4-9, Comp : ensive Plan General Goals, Objectives and Policies Recreation 4. The applicant shall, in order to mitigate on-site and regional recreation impacts, review the Parks Comprehensive Plan and the proposed Master Trail Plan with the Parks Section of the Community Services Department to determine the impacts, if any, of the proposed development on regional recreation facilities. The applicant shall provide: a) a voluntary contribution of$1,800 ($150.00 X 12 Lots)to the Parks And Recreation Fund with the fee to be paid prior to the recording of the Final Plat; OR b) an alternate plan for completion and improvement of on-site recreation facilities within one of the buildable lots. The plan for on-site recreation would need to be approved by the Development Planning Section and the Parks and Recreation Division prior to the recording of the Final Plat. Policy Nexus: Parks Comprehensive Plan. • ercrpt /' / ��� l0, li /7-- ,� �'/7/ ,dd/ • • Environmental Review Committee Staff Report West View Addition Preliminary Plat April 24, 1991 Page 3 • • Earth 5. The applicant shall, to ensure that construction follows the guidelines established by the geotechnic investigation, record the following language on the face of the plat. • A minimum building setback of twenty-five feet (25') from the top-of-slope shall be provided except for wood decks which shall provide a minimum ten foot (10') setback • from the top of slope for Lots 9, 10, 11 and 12. • • The setback are shall not be used for placement or storage of fill materials, including "temporary"excavation spoils from the building area preparation and excavation. Any development or encroachment Into the setback area should 'be evaluated by a specific geotechnic investigation. Reduction, of setback •is possible only after the geotechnic investigation and approval by the City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works. The geotechnic report shall be submitted to the satisfaction of the City of Renton Planning/Building/Public Works Department prior to the • issuance of any site preparation permits. Existing loose fill in the setback area shall be removed and natural vegetation provided in . this area. Landscape plans shall be submitted to the satisfaction of the Development Services Division of the Department of Planning/Building/Public Works prior to the • • issuance of any site preparation permits. Storm runoff from the Development shall be diverted away from the slope and not allowed to saturate the foundation area of the homes on Lots 9, 10, 11,and 12. • • Policy Nexus: Environmental eview Ordinance 4-6 Minin , Excavation and Grading Ordinance 4- t/a • f" ����i � ,�o� �/or / • Notes: At the time of the review of the preliminary plat before the Hearing Examiner, staff will 'make recommendations, including, but not limited to the following items: • The applicant shall provide a covenant which establishes a Homeowners' Association, to be responsible for maintenance of all common areas (e.g. storm drainage system, fencing, Tract A, • Tract X) with the Association to be in force and effect for the life of the project (Including a stipulation that the City, at.the Citys' discretion, may be permitted to enter onto the site for maintenance if the Homeowners'fail.in the task, with the financial responsibility to be borne by the Association). The Association is to be developed by a covenant,and described on the face of the plat, with both of these documents to be approved by the Planning/Building/Public Works Department and the City Attorney prior to the recording of the final plat with King County. The applicant shall record note on the face of the final plat indicating that a six foot cedar fence shall be required along the east boundary of the development and the back of Lots 2, 3, 7, 8, 9, and 10. The applicant seeks to subdivide a 3.68 acre parcel into 12 residential parcels and two tract lots. The western portion of the project site Is located within a greenbelt area that is heavily vegetated. Staff has recommended that a Native Growth Protection easement be required to ensure that the significant trees be retained. . A geologic report has been prepared for the project site. The report concluded that the project site was suitable for single-family homes provided that setbacks be maintained from the top-of-slope. The geologist has recommended that setbacks of 25 feet for main structures and 10 feet for wood decks be provided for future development. • The applicant has not provided on-site recreation facilities. In order to mitigate on-site and off-site recreational impacts the applicant would need to either provide recreational facilities on-site or make a voluntary contribution to the Parks and Recreation. This project would provide the opportunity to construct twelve (12) single-family homes which will increase the available housing stock within the City. ercrpt Environmental Review Commitee Staff Report West View Addition Preliminary Plat April 24, 1991 Page 4 D : : :.ENVIR.QNM�NTAL�LEM........S.:.:::.:::.�:::::::::::::::::::::::::::.:...............:...:.:.�:..::.�:.�:::..::•.:..:�:.•::....::.�:.•.�.:.........::.::::::: LAND USE 1. Whether the proposed,project is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Element Map designation and with Goals, Policies and Objectives set forth in the Plan? The proposed development is consistent with the Comprehensive•Plan designation of Single Family Residential and Greenbelt. The Comprehensive Plan defines the Single Family Residential area as an area intended for detached single family dwelling units--not exceeding a density of six dwelling units per gross acre--and related' low density uses. The proposed project provides a density of 3.3 units per acre. The density of the project Increases to 4.6 units per acre if the greenbelt area is subtracted from the gross acreage. The westerly portion.of the project site, approximately 0.8 acres, is designated as Greenbelt. The Comprehensive plan defines this as an area Intended for open space, recreation, very low density residential uses, agriculture or other compatible low intensity uses. Greenbelt areas are characterized by severe topographic, ground water, slope instability, soil or other physical limitations that make the area unsuitable for Intensive development. Provision for public enjoyment of greenbelt areas are encouraged; however, greenbelt designations do not imply the right of public access. This part of the project site has been designated as greenbelt due to the steep slope (25% slope). The applicant has designated the majority of this area, with slopes of 25% or greater, as Tract,A and the remainder as the rear portion of four lots. There is adequate area on each of these four lots for a building pad. 2. Whether the proposed project is consistent with the Zoning Map designation and applicable Zoning Ordinance components? The project site is designated R-1, Single Family Residential, on the City of Renton Zoning Map. The proposed development would allow for the future construction of twelve single family dwelling units. The Greenbelt Regulations, Section 4-31-35 of the Renton Municipal Code, establishes standards for development occurring within the Greenbelt area on slopes exceeding twenty-five percent (25%). The average slope on the proposed lots does not exceed 25%•(the lots range from nearly level to approximately 20%slope). Therefore, no specially regulations need to be applied. • 3. Whether the proposed development is consistent with the applicable subdivision regulations/standards? The proposed development is consistent with Renton Subdivision Code provisions, including standards for lot sizes, dimension, and configuration. The Code requires a minimum lot size of. 7,200 square feet. The minimum lot size provided by this development would be 7223 square feet. The corner lot has been platted to be wider than the interior lots. 4. Whether the proposed development is compatible with vicinity land uses. The area adjacent to the project site has been developed as a single-family residential area. The lot sizes within the area range from approximately 7,500 square feet to over a half acre in size. The proposed development can be considered compatible with the adjacent land uses.. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Whether the applicant has adequately identified and addressed the following environmental impacts likely to occur in conjunction with the proposed development. a. Earth . Impact: The contours on the plat map indicate that there are slopes on-site which will require consideration in evaluating the feasibility of locating single-family homes on Lots 10, 11 and 12. The Geologic Evaluation prepared by David L. Nelson, dated November 5, 1990, indicates•that the slope on the project site is stable and should not prevent • development provided the guideline recommendations, presented below are followed. • ercrpt Environmental Review Committee Staff Report West View Addition Preliminary Plat April 24, 1991 Page 5 A minimum building setback of twenty-five feet(25') from the top-of-slope shall be provided except for decks and other light weight structures which shall provide a minimum ten foot(10') setback from the top of slope. The setback are shall not be used for placement or storage of fill materials, Including "temporary" excavation spoils from the building area preparation and excavation. Any development or encroachment Into the setback area should be evaluated by a specific geotechnic Investigation. Reduction of setback Is possible only after the geotechnic investigation. Existing loose fill in the setback area shall be removed and natural vegetation provided. .I Storm runoff from the Development should be diverted away from the slope and not allowed to saturate the foundation area of the homes on Lots 9, 10, 11,and 12. The applicant has proposed two tracts as part of this subdivision. Tract A includes the greenbelt area and the steep slopes, slopes of 25%or greater. Tract X will provide an area for the on-site drainage facilities required by ordinance. .I The average slope on the proposed lots is less than 25% so no special provisions would apply under the Greenbelt Regulations. Mitigation Measures: See Recommendation#5. 1 • • Policy Nexus: Environmental Review Ordinance 4-6, Mining, Excavation and Grading Ordinance 4-10 b. Native Vegetation Protection Impact: There is existing natural vegetation on the project site. The Geologic Investigation, noted above, Indicates that trees could be pruned or removed on the slope area without series impacting the slope stability. The applicant has submitted a tree plan which indicates that the majority of the existing trees on the project site will be retained. The only trees that are designated to be removed at this time are those located in the proposed roadway and in the center of the building pads. The applicant will need to provide a Native Growth Protection Easement and a covenant to ensure that the vegetation on the slopes and outside of the building pad area is retained by future land owners and to ensure that the open space lots araNscAd as buildable lots in the future. G o The applicant has submitted a Routine Vegetation Management Permit with al tree retention plan. The plan indicates that approximately fourteen trees will need to be removed from the developed portion of the project in order to allow for the construction of the road, utilities and building pads. No trees will be removed from the greenbelt areal Mitigation Measures: See Recommendation#1 and 2. Policy Nexus: Land Clearing and Tree Cutting Ordinance 4-9 c. Housing Impact: The proposed 12 lot subdivision will allow for an increase in the housing stock in northeast Renton, in an area designated for single-family homes on the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Element Map and on the Zoning Map. Opportunities for single-family housing are becoming increasingly Important within the City as growth management practices are putting increasing pressure on developers to construct on infill areas where existing utilities and other public services can easily be extended to the new development. Mitigation Measures: None Policy Nexus: N/A ercrpt • Environmental Review Commnwe Staff Report West View Addition Preliminary Plat April 24, 1991 Page 6 d. Noise, Light and Glare impacts: a) Construction Noise, light and glare are anticipated in conjunction with the grading of the project site and with the construction of the single-family homes. Some mitigation of these impacts will be achieved through the limitation of hauling operations and routes staff will recommend to the Hearing Examiner as part of the construction management plan. b) Operation Staff consider that the subdivision and the introduction of 12 new single-family homes will only result in a modest increase in noise, light, and glare to the surrounding community. These impacts will be reduced to the extent possible by the retention of existing natural vegetation. In order to reduce the noise impacts from adjacent roadways on the future residences, staff will recommend to the Hearing Examiner that a six foot cedar fence be required along the southerly and easterly boundary of the development. Mitigation Measures: None Policy Nexus: N/A e. Traffic impacts: The planned future development of 12 single-family homes on this site, as facilitated by the proposed subdivision, is anticipated to generate approximately 120 ADWVTE's, which is not expected to result in significant traffic impacts. As a result of recently approved multi-family projects in this area a number of roadway Improvements have been provided to protect existing service levels in this area. Staff have noted,that off-site Code-required transportation improvements will be needed if the plat is approved, including roadway plans including curbs, gutters, sidewalks and 'street lighting. Mitigation Measures: None Required. Policy Nexus:N/A f. Public Services/Utilities a) Police and Fire Impacts: Police and Fire Prevention Bureau staff indicate that sufficient resources exist to provide service to the proposed development provide that Code-required improvements and fees are provided. Mitigation Measures: None Required. Policy Nexus: N/A b) Recreation Impacts: The applicant has not proposed to provide on-site recreation facilities within this plat nor have regional impacts been addressed within this proposal. The applicant will need to review the Parks Comprehensive Plan and the proposed Master Trail Plan with the Parks Section of the Community Services Department staff. In order to mitigate both on-site and regional recreation impacts the applicant may make a voluntary contribution of$1,800.00 ($150.00 X 12 Lots). Mitigation Measures: See Recommendation#4. Policy Nexus: Parks Comprehensive Plan. • ercrpt Environmental Review Committee Staff Report West View Addition Preliminary Plat • April 24, 1991 Page 7 c) Schools Impacts: It can be anticipated that the proposed project, once developed for single-family homes, will generate approximately 8 school aged children. This number of students is not expected to have a negative Impact on the Renton School System. Mitigation Measures: None Required. Policy Nexus: N/A d) Storm Water The applicant has provided a Level 1 Downstream Analysis in accordance with the King County Surface Water Design Manual. This report has been accepted by the City as the preliminary analysis. Prior to the issuance of any site preparation permits the applicant will need to provide a final storm water analysis in accordance with the King County Surface Water Design Manual adopted by the City of Renton. It should be noted that the City will not accept a level spreader at • the outfall for re-dispersing the flow mentioned as a possible alternative in the preliminary analysis. The tight-lining drainage down to Park Drive would 'be an acceptable alternative. g. Construction Impacts -Impacts: No construction impacts are anticipated in conjunction with the platting action. When construction does begin, it is expected that there will be both on-site and off-site construction impacts, including dust, debris, noise, light and glare. Staff will recommend to the Hearing Examiner that a temporary erosion/sedimentation control plan and a construction management plan be required for this development. i Mitigation Measures: None Required. Policy Nexus: N/A ::::E�»>::�:::: aIiIIMENT :QF�:AEYIEWING;DEPI4RTIUI. ......5....::::::::::::•:::::::::::::::::....................:...�:.�:.�:.�:::::•:.�:::::::.�::: s :::: : '•• 'ri .artment$.h..avc:<ceviev�.� ercrpt iC ,� E APPLICATION: '' i DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW T . .',� A ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW.....:ET La PLAN REVIEW ROUTING SLIP • I. 0 / ' OTHER /��� /.' DATE: D .a APPLICANT: L- - , JOB ADDRESS: _ - e VOA/ / � ��f �� NATURE OF WORK: __ice e" _ j'ril .i. " i_ V � �,r..r 1.04 / Vt.) PROPERTY MANAGEME T /L ;2. O DATE RECEIVED Comments ue BY PROP RTY MGMT. i le) /r2./14 Comments or suggestions regarding this application should be provided In writing. Please provide comments to the Comm.Dev. Dept.(C.D.D.)by 5:00 p.m.on above date. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION 9) kktA1A-41 A 4.,,,..6.izi-- fES APPLIED CANNOT APPLY ES ❑ EGAL DESCRIPTION Li NEED MORE INFORMATION ❑ SQUARE FOOTAGE ! ❑ FRONT FOOTAGE ElVICINITY MAP It Is the Intent of this development fee analysis to put the developer/owner on notice,that the fees quoted below will apply to the subject site upon development of the property. All quoted fees are due and payable at the time the construction permit Is Issued to install the on-site and off-site Improvements (i.e. underground utilities,street improvements,etc.) PROJECT COST LATECOMER LATECOMER AGREEMENT-WATER NO. PER. FTG. FEE CITY HELD --0- PRIVATE DEVELOPER HELD .. , 0 LATECOMERS•AGREEMENT-SEWER CITY HELD PRIVATE DEVELOPER HELD ~_0 .. SPECIAL UTILITY CONNECTION CHARGE-WATER UNITS SUCC FEE Single family residential dwelling unit $940/lot x , / 1/o0. " Apartment, Condo,each multiplex unit$545/ea.unit x Commercial/Industrial $.126/sq.ft.of property x (not less than $940.00) ' • SPECIAL UTILITY CONNECTION CHARGE-SEWER Single family residential dwelling unit$470/lot x 1 'Z p Apartment, Condo,each multiplex unit $270/ea.unit x ' p Commercial/Industrial$.063/sq.ft.of property x (not less than$470.00) SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT(Hospital Area)WATER UNITS . SAD FEE . Developments with 1500 'M Fire/lows or Less: Area Charge$0.034 .er ft.x Frontage Charge$16.1 a per front ft.x Developments with Greater th 500 GPM Fire Flows: Area Charge$0.04 er q.ft.x Frontage Charge 8.00 p•r front ft.x ... D SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT(Honey Crk, Intercptr)-SEWER UNITS SAD FEE Area Charges: Residential d• eiling unl , apartments or equivalen ;$25.1 per dwelling unit x ! Commercial dev op ent: $.05 per sq.ft.of . oss site area x Front Footage Charges: $37.19 per Fry t Ft. .n ea.side)x , $74.38 per P. Ft. (prpt on both sides of imprv.)x D • TOTAL: $ / , &0® 40 The above quoted fees sin NOT inthld, inspeclluu lees, sidle sewer peiuuIt., r/w puunutl tees ter the cu.t of water meters. 1 ch....1„.. . , /7 Signature of Director or Authorized Ropro.ontativ DATE �� /I......,,,�. 6\D %CIG . t " • DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING/BUILDING/:P,UB1_1C WORKS DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET i ECF-116-90 • APPLICATION NO(S).: PP;RVMP-116-90 • PROPONENT: John Krehblel/Woodland Investments • ' PROJECT TITLE: '• West View Addition • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: preliminary reliminary plat to subdivide 3.68 acres Into 12 single; family home lots. LOCATION: • '• ' . • , SEC:8 •I'111MSHP:23N RNG:5E• NE corner of SR 405 and Sunset Blvd (approx. 1800 NE . 12th) . j TO: PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION SCHEDULED TAC DATE:•10/19/90 • ENGINEERING SECTION • TRAFFIC ENG. SECTION •• • UTILITIES ENG. SECTION . • FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU I • POLICE DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION CONSTRUCTION FIELD SERVICES DEVELOPMENT PLANNING • PLANNING &TECHNICAL SERVICES ._PARKS AND RECREATION DIVISION• ' __T_OTHERS: I ti COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5:00 P.M. ON OCTOBER 12, 1990. S • ' ^ REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: • APPROVED • • _ APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED x , eP a r flails s AP , wa e r '�ein I p r vv a rr<¢riI S 4001. ✓0) 0 `�' 'S,°h red ;red, pIa,„ shaII Cnfvi .1•o Cd, 0r Rion $4hda ^d (o r • De.vtl° er t e.x-,osio, of CI+ u iiVes,; o-•;t1 in r° re_ re Urcd •h'� nOI Ii►rn;fe4 4oPP foil ow i�� sa, � •o•PS-:i1h-c,ti• wa-k•vv,,a,rl oh ntJ / d.zd�CcvFca J1-►4:-el• ' ' `: nSfa Ila+,on of F'n - ydrarr as Chow i o Are l tv n ei / PIa+ e GnJ cnd DQ ecic Worj-er Ss✓V•Ce5 ai requ,ve . • ' I1; 1 s►saw plc v{l op hiG'v�t •fees/.�c✓', ',,« X , s�b�.cc'f' ' �o 411• A I�cabl� , / � • !? , ), �'ets. I �.,eVew•Sh -)• . a �a'cl a( J ` DATE: 101M) SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV.5/90 devrveht ._..... ._—.. • DEPARTh.._.fT OF PLANNING/BUILDING/P1JbdC WORKS • DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET i • ' ECF-116-90 APPLICATION NO(S).: PP;RVMP-116-90 PROPONENT: John Krehblel/Woodland Investments 0 PROJECT TITLE: West View Addition • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: A preliminary plat to subdivide 3.68 acres Into 12 single- family home lots. LOCATION: SEC:8 TWNSHP:23N RNG:5E NE corner of SR 405 and Sunset Blvd (approx. 1800 NE 12th) TO: • PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION SCHEDULED TAC DATE: 10/19/90 ENGINEERING SECTION TRAFFIC ENG. SECTION UTILITIES ENG. SECTION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION • • CONSTRUCTION FIELD SERVICES • DEVELOPMENT PLANNING • • PLANNING &TECHNICAL SERVICES • PARKS AND RECREATION DIVISION OTHERS: ' COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING.• PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5:00 P.M:. ON OCTOBER 12, 1990.• • REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: • -ere— PrC CAA-1 u- APPROVED - PROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED • Any development and/or construction shall comply with current Fire and Building Codes and Ordi- nances.A A seaaiad means of approved access is required. Fire Department access roads/lanes shall be paved minimum width 20'; minimum height 13' 6". Yes e--- "No Preliminary fire flow calculations show a fire flow of /, Cr,.o is required. i hydrants with a minimum flow of i, a gpm each is required. Primary hydrant is required to be within 300 feet of the structure. Secondary hydrants ure required to be within /4 feet of structure. `" the An approved automatic sprinkler system is required to protect the total structure. Yes,.__._ No All fire department access roads are to be paved and installed prior to construction. Yes 4 No— All fire hydrants are required to be installed and approved prior to construction. Yes J No • i., DATE: Q # 7, /?Pe SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 5/90 • devmht ' 10. Aesthetics 11; Llaht& Ginra 12. Recreation 13. Historic&Cultural Preservation 14. Transportation • 15. Public Services 16.• Utilities • ' • COMMENTS: -r am Nl • • • i• We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas In which'we have expertise and have identified areas of probable Impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. JOct• /'° % 9 Signature of Director or Authorized Represents e . • Date • Rev. 6/88 envn shl • • REVIEW COMMENTS • PRELIMINARY PLAT(NE 12TH ST. &KENNEWICK) • • 4 Pp•-ox•� -,A-fc. L.vcZ�lct • JOHN KEHBIEL 0 Oct. 10, 1990 • 1. NB 12th St. roadway improvements to provide: o Curb, gutters, sidewalk and Street lighting. 2) Provide street light drawing for cul-de-sac roadway. • • • PLAN -�� DEPARTIUf I II1Y`' 'T OF PLANNING BUILDING P�` i 1C WORKS CRY oP�t'tv�sloty ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET OCT 12 1990 H CEIVED REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: `Pp1 ice DATE CIRCULATED: 9/27/90 COMMENTS DUE: 10/12/90 ECF-116-90 APPLICATION NO(S): PP;RVMP-116-90 PROPONENT: John Krehblel/Woodland Investments PROJECT TITLE: West View Addition 0 • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: A preliminary plat to subdivide 3.68 acres into 12 single-family home lots. •LOCATION; NE corner of SR 405 and.Sunset Blvd (approx. 1800 NE 12th) . SITE AREA: 3.68 BUILDING AREA (gross): N/A IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS: PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth 2. Air • • ' 3. Water • 4. Plants • • 5. . Animals • • • • 6. Energy& Natural Resources 0 7. Environmental Health 8. Land & Shoreline Use 9. • Housing . ' ' • 10. Aesthetics • 11. Light&Glare 12. Recreation 13. Historic&Cultural Preservation 14. Transportation 15. Pubfic Services 16. Utilities PbItc� COMMENTS: ' l C ,VNT al D 14(. 6 +h.,* 44,c6 !, ,, We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable Impact or areas where additional information Is needed to properly assess this proposal. j24:1446W4jitij--• 1012AO Signature of Directdapr Auttidlzed Representative Date Rev. 6/88 • mynah, t=11 L- Wditt:v Li 4 l RANI UU1-hL.nU • • - POLICE DEPARTMENT . DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION ' CONSTRUCTION FIELD SERVICES DEVELOPMENT PLANNING . PLANNING.&TECHNICAL SERVICES.. , PARKS AND RECREATION DIVISION ' _OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING ANNING DIVISION BY 5AO P M.HIS APPLICATION SHOULD oN OCTOBERTI2, PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE P. 1990. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: ewer 1,' APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS X NOT APPROVED APPROVED '' v 11 de ve l o pine J v b),:c r, hfi-Die-way irn/ro verrtn'�J 5h41) b.e re�v�re I � � f � ho�✓�� R � Gt)JllrieS And X firp kalif Sha II s'u b�►�1;1 A corn/Mile, f/ S prohie of 310(ri an �i el e .w ers 5;R e 2"y 3 t1/ Sh o w i't d S4 f Se arc r►�1 ; - m1n111iv✓ri Se T art/ I all , CY'oSs�ng� And1 -{ha ,1 P ara �tll le) wn� / J Slorrn qn sewer' " S / w �0 WAIT iBI' VCI�fCa/ it11n1iM0� Se Wer And wader ' In wall / w ei fer and .S+e(el — 7'S 1 vall i-o w 011 4X, M i.n i rn v ri 31 ze_ o f Saw 1 +ci ty Sew-e..'' ;m cc �v, ' S j'tAbsdan apt(d ivt 1 1✓, 5110 be (, il1d' tr n a r'va; n l Ar SE u->n rYpv'rP i n ves 5 A ie. o G<.e.� A I,l i San y J.A v 1 J '� :IIVe re a L ar p rn�6ef c nne�/ - bQ 3e(ye d. by c� r erlF,r�Afio�►� is w► d. � �� J° y as : showr . lGQ/� tek DATE: Z SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 5/90 • devrvshl REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: 'Pt Ot_itiWt • APPROVED IJ APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED • d,,La Q Le--.� 6,o O.La.„,6 .)-• G...)\-1-7;rv•--c-k. t_irk 1,..,,X..Az! a � iv-' !IAN ITh- 0000 e--e t ic "ice 1: NS-- DATE: • a ) 9. SIGNATURE F DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 5/90 devrvshl FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMEI.. + DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION • CONSTRUCTION FIELD SERVICES ti DEVELOPMENT PLANNING PLANNING &TECHNICAL SERVICES • . PARKS AND RECREATION DIVISION • OTHERS: • • COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. • PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5:00 P.M. ON OCTOBER 12, 1990. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: . T 1 L S "A 114) GAS r • .`, APPROVED QCAPPROVED WITH CONDITIONS • NOT APPROVED (L (/ --e.!!. • • DATE: !Cr' 77) • SIGNATURE OF DIRECTO ' R AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE ' REV. 5/90 devrvahl • REVIEWING DEPARTMENT DIVISION: 51-ORrt1 APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED I' ' The , s.*o/Im, c:reo.leig , .CI%)Die ) •qnd Te,•vipo✓avy, Cros,.'00 . $��I r►^evl�,� r�v�:r .0 fro,) ► f'I4yi, tri a cc d qt-i W!th I4RO ICI y' 1 Sri Court / ► eic•e Wrier'• n M , q h,�aI- Z. 8RoPirI"ira11r1°1 SAC( li •A rep l'Ve091 ,;F addld-rai i pal(ed 111VevV101/_5 area e.?Cce.eo(S so0o 51, 3'. �� y own,. cdr ,'9•Q,,,.1, •• ��"r'�� sys��►-� n A I's o�� � I)owe� C in �- w,►-N "1' Fl separa e . t i-a t ,n i rs la1" U iy be dedrea4d for dvl eri fiorl I ! �-AiC 4/11- 14 DATE: /000 SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 5/90 •devrvahl • • 1. earth ______ .. 2. Air 3. Water • •• . 4. Plants , , • ' • 5. Animals • . 6. Energy&Natural Resources 7. Environmental Health • 8. .Land &Shoreline Use V 9. Housing . 10. Aesthetics 14. Light&Glare • • • . ' • • 12. Recreation • t • 13. Historic&Cultural Preservation 14. Transportation • 15. Public Services 16. Utilities iI C i)V1S iruc-hHn �e�rui c �,¢,� e4...a COMMENTS: • • , _Y 6iz,<0 0,11-,�,�• ��t : /4(1 . . . .. . . . wiL a;tt_ ),Am...4.... 40,--6 „ez..0..a 691.1,19 !ewe-pi _Ate-,e--41-6-vt-q1 . . . . • • We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas In which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. ii( • ' . 49---- 2 7----7eD Sign ure of Director or Authorized Representative Date . Rev. 6/88 • envrvsht • -•—w:—I uuuI,vas wL-aa ' _--_-...---— - - ._-----•.- -- a _---- 16. Utilities h fl.�rk COMMENTS: , ywrr ,.-.- &. ..t—,. r/..'_._-J;�.. ,. :._.'.: ..• ..`..e.._..--•L.E n_e4,!.......) :( r• C.. c� . f „.�7a • .i-c-4----s- �- —e--���c...c ,r%l�L•-, .`-.if/'✓)-2 -vri'--- '-' e-c/=-1-? ��/ �� =' , ...s.� �i,,,,i�.�. O �•i c� ./�vim-�. a-c�•-� !'../�„�-�-.,._.-e:�.::G' , /`• �`.'.<<,.;,,..,,._,.,...., . �.. A- LI Av)-1- "---.-'- /1 �;-.- jG.ljr�•y�� --.e � ,41. - , .,•,..�P ir(f _G.("; J\_,'.� I p� �v�✓O'` We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have Identified areas of pro s.ble impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. . / • ' Nv-4,1%7L-r-t- ' /6' ---96 S s ture of DI ector or Authorized Representative Date Rev.6/88 rf • envrvam I .............................. ................ . ... • : . : : : .:: .::::.::,:: : . ;:.::.:::::En�ilroin.mental:,l�evlew �Q:.::m::::::::::: ::: :. ...::..:..::.. .:...::..:..:. ::..::. ...::::. : :: N. N.:7 0E: > mimmi :{ >: : imi:Ii: : ::><:: • • • April 24, 1991 • To: Lynn Guttmann, Planning/Building/Public Works Administrator John Webley, Community Services Administrator ' Lee Wheeler, Fire Chief From: Don Erickson, Secretary • 19 :: > i : �<`: a > > « < :: eet :. <D.ete::::::::::: ::::>::Aril:2d ...9.9.......... ... .::::::•::::::::::.:::::::::.:... ...............�:.�:.�:.�:.�:..::.�::::.�:.:•::::.�::::::.:�:.�:..::.:.:.�:.� ::::::::::1 00 A :>:: ::oiiii>:::::::>::'::::::>�i•ii::::::>::>: >: :: ::: ::::::: ::::::: ;;:»:: ;:;: ::::::::::: ::::::::::: <::V.T1: t •:::: ::::: :: ::::»:i*:?i'hii'cl::door .ontei'eil:Ge:F:ieoo.. . ... .:: ::::::: ::: :. ::•:..... ..:.:. :::.., :::.:.:..::. :..:... :::::. :.::.:;: Agenda attached below. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA ' APRIL 24, 1991 Third Floor Conference Room Commencing at 10:00 AM ' TIME/KEY PARTICIPANTS NEW US WEST FUEL TANK ECF-028-91 (Mary Savela: .6170) . Applicant seeks permission to abandon, In place, an existing 1,000 gallon diesel fuel tank, which Is no longer being used, located under an existing building. The ' project Is located at 225 Williams.Ave S. WEST VUE PRELIMINARY PLAT ECF;PP;RVMP-116-90 (Mark Pywell: 5586) A preliminary plat to subdivide 3.68 acres Into 12 single- family home lots. The project site Is located on the NE corner of SR 405 and Sunset Blvd (approx. 1800 NE 12th). SENIOR HOUSING PROJECT ECF;R;RVMP;SA;SHPL;V-020-91 (Lenora Blauman: 6168) The City of Renton is seeking to construct a senior housing facility, under a municipal bond Issue, on a subject property totalling 13.41 acres/five discrete parcels. In order to provide this development, as proposed, the applicant must obtain several permits, as follows: 1) a subdivision (including consolidation/redefinition of lot lines) resulting in three lots, with Lot #1 proposed to be 4.4 acres, Lot #2 proposed to be 3.24 acres, and Lot #3 (Tract A) proposed to be 5.73 acres; 2) reclassification of proposed Lot #1 from R-1 and R-2 to R-3 -- Lots #2 and #3 will retain their existing R-1 zone; 3) site plan approval for a 88,300 square foot/105 unit housing facility (23.86 units per acre) on proposed Lot#1 (Lot #2 will be preserved as a dedicated greenbelt buffer between the housing complex and neighboring properties and Lot . #3 - adjoining Honeycreek Recreation area - will remain open space; 4) a variance from the requirement for primary access to Lot #2 which is.to remain as a greenbelt (secondary/emergency access will be provided); and 5) a Routine Vegetation Management Permit to undertake selective clearing of proposed Lot #1 and Lot#2,to prepare for construction of the housing facilities, amenities and public service/utilities improvements. Lot #3 (Tract A), which is to be retained as open space, will not undergo vegetation management. The project site is 3150 NE 16'h Street. Environmental Review Cor 'tee Meeting Notice April 24, 1991 Page 2 • DISCUSSION Reserve Parking (DKE) Authorization of Transportation Mitigation Fees Expenditure (DKE) • cc: J. Covington, Executive Assistant to the Mayor L.Warren, City Attorney • F. Kaufman, Hearing Examiner G. Gotti, Fire Marshal J. Hanson, Development Services P. Pierce, P/B/PW Admin • • :::: :if:::i::i:liii,: . ; ; ::: �: :: .: N � BU :::ur G• PU LIC:WON t S.......................... r: .F r= .......................................................................................................... • i:i:: ::��:: ..!�AN..:::: ::.::•:::::::.:::::::::::::::::::.:::::::.:.Wpv�:and:ln es:me.:.n .�.::::•:.:.::::......:.....:....:: :.':::.. :::::.�::::.:':.: .. ::i1Q,i .d7, :::::.::: : :::::::.::::::: : ::::.::::::::::::WestV:ew.Add.:.on:P:elim.:narY:.:la.::::::::.:..M::::: :::::: :::: tOSI ..O....M ...tAti.C.40•OKI.IOT.::...............'NP... F'. ....:1.P.RQ....................i.... ............. ............. r..:•:....:::::.•g...: •"'ii:"'"'ii'i `fiy....{i::'ii:'iiii:�'r':iiii:iiiiiii!iiiii^. iii..::i::.:. ........:...........................:..............:................. ..... ..:.... .. :.::...... .:i7::::::::7:I1;i::1:.I:{{itl:ll,:::.:7::;'1;,.: {7:i:117•::1:1.::FnF.T:7::'Frt:';:,,:F...-.:::iN-F,. M.. ;r+i+ < ` :: 60Cif.:PTI:ON OF:p.R0.0.0$::::•: ::•:::•:::: :::he:applicant.:seeks:.•:n::erea:e.;e.:12 lot preliminary: ::e:(:: :::; :::::::>::: : :< 2:: `:::5:: ::: :::>::: > :::: ii : :::<:iri::::':< :i::::t +s> r ..i ::<i: .:t...r..:: V.i..:.. ::::: .. :::::....:.. .....i•.,_ ...... '::;: ..:: :o.: .pem x ::fuu edo.::eoRm�nt. vi: singefam�,y..: a �,�>1..a r . :: ?: :::>>:: `::i:�::�: ::: : : g:i:'�: <: : :>::: : : :><�: :>: :�:�: : .. e�i ..eno s:::ara�.::twa.t.. ot...ots..on..a. :><:>::: :>:> >i ::>::: �::�:: �>. :::: ::<:: ::::>:::::>:�:::T o ed si n.i . .arces.will ra.. e...n.size.f.. rn.. ::, :.':'i 'i'' •}:l fir;:.•i:: •,:{:;:•}} •::1::;:•}:• �^ir:�;:i;::•} �- %f+�F:::l.t 7..:.•. .7 :: :':':i;i-}rrl :H'.'::... .irnrri. i : :; r:.':.';:. :i i 6C TIb QF.N.46"08SAiii.. he ..o ect.sl..e..s.loca.ed..o.n.the.sau.h.s 0.0: .IV.. ..:0:rJ f e ee N. :::: :::::::::::;::::>:::;:: :::::::;:>::::::::::>:::: ::>:: : ::;:;:;:: :: :; :::::::::::;:::::;...St..eet.wes�.o.....b .rd . n.� e... �....���������<> a;; qv � `,- 011, •ii Jl.�—Jf.A ,per_. � , h r /i' ;i:;; �:•:s... ''' ME. , r s, �sE:' Itre,S79,,, , S71. ir.r..S«J.J . ..4� • fiI• 41'1 r+' • J/ .' rtwcr :4 .. . A I`\ •. )L Jtr i••••. '� ,-roe p.— A ;i 1 a I ,V1° ovt nJ ;•i.,• , tit Jf/ ..,Jm • t' s .,n4 • "�7 1 • . • i,.. w i?\ 1J''`,',y +y . + b ., \ ..) • c Or. • G' A A ooer.HHi n?o • .i. Gi• . c a. / ,',�;a�•. •;• i reAcr x" • ii . masu •••27: tin 0 iL cNfi p;; -71....: .,.. .... . 0 °° illA: egg ll� `gala milm us ' T*° .ko GII : 4[111111i4 I a a99 :: . 1.111111..— a13 1111:11— :.. .: ,.. Ili . .1 -- -*Ior, pe tom'' . Technical Advisory Committee Staff Report • Park View Preliminary Plat April 12, 1991 Page 2 :`� isi'• ;> ::xi• i`§ i i i �< >' iii i':'`? iii'':iii•?• < . < s�i ;> ; <`> '• .. ..... .................. .,.(,1:.. --.,4 , <, AND USE 'd •, C 1�.' • Whether the proposed project isc onsistent with the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Element Map designation and with Goals, Policies and Objectives set forth in the Plan? I The proposed development.is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan designation of Single Family Residential and Greenbelt. The Comprehensive Plan defines the Single ! Family Residential area as an area intended for detached single family dwelling units--not exceeding a density of six dwelling units per gross acre--and related low density uses. The proposed project provides a density of 3.3 units per acre. The density of the project 'increase to 4.6 units per acre if the greenbelt area is subtracted from the gross acreage. • . The westerly portion of the project site, approximately 0.8 acres, is designated as . Greenbelt.. The Comprehensive plan defines this as an area intended for open space, recreation, very low density residential uses, agriculture or other compatible low intensity uses. Greenbelt areas are characterized by severe topographic, ground water, slope instability, soil or other physical limitations that make the area unsuitable for intensive development. Provision for public enjoyment of greenbelt areas are encouraged; however, greenbelt designations do not imply the right of public access. This part of;the project site has been designated as greenbelt due to the steep slope (25% slope). The applicant has designated the majority of this area as Tract A and the remainder as the rear portion of four lots. There is adequate area on each of these four lots for a building padL' theZoningMapdesignation and 2. Whether the proposed project is consistent with g applicable Zoning Ordinance components? ,y' • The project site is designated R-1, Single Family Residential, on the City of Renton Zoning9 Map. The proposed development would allow for the future construction of twelve single family dwelling units. 1 i 3. Whether the proposed development is consistent with the applicable subdivision ! regulations/standards? 1 The proposed development is consistent with Renton Subdivision Code provisions, Including standards for lot sizes, dimension, and configuration. The Code requires a minimum lot size of 7,200 square feet. The minimum lot size provided by this development would be 7223 square feet. The corner lot has been platted to be wider than the interior lots. . • . 4. Whether the proposed development is compatible with vicinity land uses. The area'adjacent to the project site has been developed as a single-family residential area. The lot sizes within the area range from approximately 7,500 square feet to over a half acre in size. The.proposed development can be considered compatible with the adjacent land uses. ;, ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS , 1 1. Whether the applicant has adequately Identified and addressed the following environmental impacts likely to occur in conjunction with the proposed development. a. Earth Impact: The contours on the plat map Indicate that there are slopes on-site which will require consideration in evaluating the feasibility of locating single-family homes on Lots 10, 11 and 12. The Geologic Evaluation prepared by David L Nelson, dated November 5, 1990, Indicates that the slope on the project site is stable and should not prevent development provided the guideline recommendations, presented below are followed. A.minimum building setback of twenty-five feet (25') from the top-of-slope shall be provided except for decks and other light weight structures which shall provide a minimum ten foot(10') setback from the top of slope. ,i Technical Advisory Corn __ ae Staff Report Park View Preliminary Plat April 12, 1991 Page 3 The setback are shall not be used for placement or storage of fill materials, Including "temporary" excavation spoils from the building area preparation and excavation. Any development or encroachment into the setback area should be evaluated by a specific geotechnic investigation. Reduction of setback is possible only after the geotechnic investigation. Existing loose fill In the setback area shall be removed and the area and natural vegetation provided. Storm runoff from the Development should be diverted away from' the slope and not allowed to saturate the foundation area of the homes on Lots 9, 10, 11,and 12. Mitigation Measures: See Recommendation#3. Policy Nexus: Environmental Review Ordinance 4-6, Mining, Excavation and Grading Ordinance 4-10 • b. Native Vegetation Protection Impact: There is existing natural vegetation on the project site. The Geologic Investigation, noted above, Indicates that trees could be pruned or removed on the slope area without series impacting the slope stability. The applicant has submitted a tree plan which Indicates that the majority of the existing trees on the project site will be retained. The only trees that are designated to be removed at this time are those located in the proposed roadway and in the center of the building pads. The applicant will need to provide a Native Growth Protection Easement to ensure that the vegetation on the slopes and outside of the building pad area is retained by future land owners. • The applicant has submitted a Routine Vegetation Management Permit with a tree retention plan. The plan Indicates that approximately fourteen trees will need to be removed from the developed portion of the project in order to allow for the construction of the road, utilities and building pads. No trees will be removed from the greenbelt area. Mitigation Measures: See Recommendation#1. Policy Nexus: Land Clearing and Tree Cutting Ordinance 4-9 c. Housing Impact: The proposed 12 lot subdivision will allow for an Increase In the housing stock in northeast Renton, in an area designated for single-family homes on the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Element Map and on the Zoning Map. Opportunities for single-family housing are becoming increasingly Important within the City as growth management practices are putting increasing pressure on developers to construct on inf ill areas where existing utilities and other public services can easily be extended to the new development. • Mitigation Measures: None Policy Nexus: N/A d. Noise, Light and Glare Impacts: a) Construction Noise, light and glare are anticipated in conjunction with the grading of the project site and with the construction of the single-family homes. Some mitigation of these Impacts will be achieved through the limitation of hauling operations and routes staff will recommend to the Hearing Examiner as part of the construction management plan. Technical Advisory Committee Staff Report Park View Preliminary Plat April 12, 1991 Page 4 b) Operation Staff consider that the subdivision and the introduction of 12 new single- family homes will only result In a modest Increase in noise, light, and glare to the surrounding community. These impacts will be reduced to the extent possible by the retention of existing natural vegetation. In order to reduce the noise Impacts from adjacent roadways on the future residences, staff will recommend to the Hearing Examiner that a six foot cedar fence be required along the southerly and easterly boundary of the development. Mitigation Measures: None Policy Nexus: N/A • e. Traffic Impacts: The planned future development of 12 single-family homes on this site, as facilitated by the proposed subdivision, is anticipated to generate approximately 120 ADWVTE's, which is not expected to result In significant traffic impacts. As a result of recently approved multi-family projects In this area a number of roadway improvements have been provided to protect existing service, levels in this area. Staff have noted, that off-site Code-required transportation Improvements will be needed if the plat is approved, including roadway plans Including curbs, gutters, sidewalks and street lighting. Mitigation Measures: None Required. • Policy Nexus: N/A f. Public Services/Utilities a) Police and Fire Impacts: Police and Fire Prevention Bureau staff indicate that sufficient resources exist to provide service to the proposed development provide that Code-required improvements and fees are provided. Mitigation Measures: None Required. Policy Nexus: N/A • b) Recreation Impacts: The applicant has not proposed to provide on-site recreation • facilities within this plat nor have regional Impacts been addressed within this proposal. The applicant will need to review the Parks Comprehensive Plan and the proposed Master Trail Plan with the Parks Section of the Community Services Department staff. In order to mitigate both on-site and regional recreation Impacts the applicant may make a voluntary contribution of$1,800.00 ($150.00 X 12 Lots). Mitigation Measures: See Recommendation#2. Policy Nexus: Parks Comprehensive Plan. c) Schools Impacts: It can be anticipated that the proposed project, once developed for single-family homes, will generate approximately 8 school aged children. This number of students is not expected to have a negative Impact on the Renton School System. Mitigation Measures: None Required. Policy Nexus: N/A Technical Advisory Co; tee Staff Report Park View Preliminary fiat April 12, 1991 Page 5 d) Storm Water The applicant has provided a Level 1 Downstream Analysis in accordance with the King County Surface Water Design Manual. This report has been accepted by the City as the preliminary analysis. Prior to the issuance of any site preparation permits the applicant will need to provide a final storm water analysis In accordance with the .King County Surface Water Design Manual adopted by the City of Renton. it should be noted that the City will not accept a level spreader at the outfall for re-dispersing the flow mentioned as a possible alternative in the preliminary analysis. The tight- lining drainage down to Park Drive would be an acceptable alternative. g. Construction Impacts Impacts: No construction Impacts are anticipated.in conjunction with the platting action. When construction does begin, it is expected that there will be both on- site and off-site construction impacts, Including dust,debris, noise, light and glare. Staff will recommend to the Hearing Examiner that a temporary erosion/sedimentation control plan and a construction management plan be required for this development. Mitigation Measures: None Required. Policy Nexus: N/A 040010 Staff recommend that the ERC Issue a Determination of Non-Significance - Mitigated with the following conditions: 1. The applicant shall, In order to ensure that the significant trees on the project site are retained, provide a Native Growth Protection Easement for the slope area and the significant trees outside of the building pad area and road right-of-way. This easement shall be prepared to the satisfaction of the Development Planning Section and the City Attorney prior to the recording of the final plat map. Policy Nexus: Land Clearing and Tree Cutting Ordinance 4-9 , • 2. The applicant shall, in order to mitigate on-site and regional recreation Impacts, review the Parks Comprehensive Plan and the proposed Master Trail Plan with the Parks Section of the Community Services Department to determine the impacts of the proposed development. Prior to recording the final plat the applicant shall provide the required recreational facilities or provide a voluntary contribution to the Parks And Recreation Fund. Policy Nexus: Parks Comprehensive Plan. 3. The applicant shall, to ensure that construction follows the guidelines established by the geotechnic investigation, record the following language on the face of the plat. A minimum building setback of twenty-five feet (25') from the top-of-slope shall be provided except for decks and other light weight structures which shall provide a minimum ten foot (10') setback from the top of slope. • • The setback are shall not be used for placement or storage of fill materials, including "temporary" excavation spoils from the building area preparation and excavation. Any development or encroachment Into the setback area should be evaluated by a specific geotechnic Investigation. Reduction of setback is possible only after the geotechnic investigation. The geotechnic investigation shall be submitted to the satisfaction of the City of Renton Planning/Building/Public Works Department prior to the Issuance of any site preparation permits. Existing loose fill in the setback area shall be removed and the area and natural vegetation provided. Landscape plans shall be submitted to the satisfaction of the Development Services Division of the Department of Planning/Building/Public Works prior to the Issuance of any site preparation permits. Technical Advisory Committee Staff Report Park View Preliminary Plat April 12, 1991 Page 6 Storm rUnoff from the Development should be diverted away from the slope nor allowed to saturate the foundation area of the homes on Lots 9, 10, 11,and 12. Policy Nexus: Environmental Review Ordinance 4-6, Mining, Excavation and Grading Ordinance 4-10 Notes: The applicant shall provide a covenant which establishes a Homeowners' Association a Homeowners' Association, to be responsible for maintenance of all common areas (e.g. storm drainage system, fencing, Tract A, Tract X) with the Association to be In force and effect for the life of the project (including a stipulation that the City, at the Citys'discretion, may be permitted to enter onto the site for maintenance if the Homeowners'fail in the task, with the financial responsibility to be borne by the Association). The Association Is to be developed by a covenant, and described on the face of the plat, with both of these documents to be approved by the Planning/Building/Public Works Department and the City Attorney prior to the recording of the final plat with King County. The applicant shall record note on the face of the final plat Indicating that a six foot cedar • fence shall be required along the east boundary of the development and the back of Lots . 2,3,7,8,9,and 10. • The applicant shall provide off-site Improvements as required by the Renton Subdivision Ordinance and other applicable ordinances. .i� ..................................................... ....,.............:....:... . .:.......... �>::::::::..�C�.11►1111M�I�.�S:�� �i��'i�I�I/M:N�:.��..:A�.:.: . •:••,• !: u s , , ::::..;.i,i. ., .!: !: •,:a: ,... , ,r:::!:,:::: ,.,:�;;,�.,.!.;,�a:•,!::::::::,:•............::.:•: !r:•:!.:!I•r:�v!!!!!! �!•:•i•:d!!!l+d,,•.,•I:•,: ,,4, ill:. a�,q,,�S;i,��y�i��,ll��,�1:,��4}Ii��la�l�lSlifdllidi•I���N,•lh9iidyUd•!Iw•,.,b,�,aaji+,•i�l�l•,!P,!:a•db,•I�t•:•J1!,p�l�I�J,,I!�;�I i 1 i i,;,:,.!,:,p t,;,,.,,.:,I,,.:,!�,,,,,:,,, I,� I e. ..a.......,,,..,...:.:>:::.:<.: .: : .::;.• . .>:.;:::•; . . : .;»:.::::�...,f... .... ..... :< :4:::men ed...0 . n ...................... City::Eppartm�n�s. h�ue:.re�ewed.:�nd �.:;m ::.�:::::::::.P:::::.;•:•:.:.:.:::<p:.:;:1..:.:::.�:::::::::::::::::: ,. �c� . ..s.ts.. r.. ..a . e y...�.:.......C.........,::!�,r.::.., ,,•:...:::::.:.:.::::::.:.���,:!:, ;,!<;,,:,:,�,:,�!;,,:;!is�!,��.:.,•,�!�!::1�l.�.�!,!,:�,:.,i,:,:��:;.;:,,,:,,,.,.,!i9.,.,::,,!,!, 1. Earth • 2. Air 3. Water • 4. Plants • 5. Animals • ' 6. Energy&Natural Resources 7. Environmental Health • 8. , Land &Shoreline Use 9. Housing 10. Aesthetics • 11. Light&Glare • 12. Recreation /• 13. Historic&Cultural Preservation 14. Transportation • 15. Public ServIces 16. Utilities 1 COMMENTS: (DAs �"4t.•pOA� &AEU C dh 7ed /6 °:eeff 9414")( pey id._ /2.tpt 01449 ilvd-iyeete-e--4 • • • • •. We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas In which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable Impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. g_ 27--.6 Sign ure of Director or Authorized Representative Date Rev.6/88 • anvrvshl _..•-... •. 16. Utilities I--- -� -•-• •---•. • COMMENTS: /j�� 1 '"" Y ...r, ./� 1t' t- 1 r !.• J: �. .•�. `_.r�..E-3ti_C...c'•...-� !�. �- (�y�v!-L�'�+-- 'a-`� lid'+^���y,Vh�•7GP'-�"�. `'� j L'/:.^ /''•r.-•C!'_ j0(,f .g, (-2 .r We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of pro.•ble impact or areas where additional information Is needed to properly assess this proposal. S • ature of Di ector or Authorized Representative Date Rev. 6/88 envrvshl FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU • POLICE DEPARTMENT • DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION ' CONSTRUCTION FIELD SERVICES y . DEVELOPMENT PLANNING PLANNING &TECHNICAL SERVICES PARKS AND RECREATION DIVISION ' OTHERS: • • COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. • PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5:00 P.M. ON OCTOBER 12, 1990. • . 4 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: S r-la 1:11"Icr-6 ' APPROVED PcAPPROVED WITH CONDITIONS • NOT APPROVED C7Z-e 7Z1 DATE: `CJ 3 SIGNATURE OF DIRECTO R AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 5/90 ' deshl -viv REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: 9r0R1�1 APPROVED • APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS lc NOT APPROVED ', I' The , 5. 1-0(1rn. arecoia�-e ?e I%)I)Ie.S' On d ' Te-ry p0✓aVl. Cro,Sln1 .' $esl ionev�-�-,ah rss�l• ` 1�ro.� II W. ha II ' .b� des!pre /'j .c ce ndcpice With MO K l Cou✓1 y Svr c,a wader ..Desk rl z' Qiv Fr` I¢rot iI01l .5'�a I I �� re u'ved� ,i F Ji d"to'i f paved. :v'i erviov.. are e�ceeo(s 5000.9 F�-. 1e • 3'. ' p� ,a-�`o r s ys�� I's n o�- A Il o wed i r� CI y own. ,ed r' CIA*W e se tvo 1 e .. fro,e4 , i 3 io loch ► m/ he dedrealed for dvle�t,'ori • ' IP•, G 44 //2/f • DATE: .. SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 5/90 demrshl • , POLICE DEPARTMENT • DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION CONSTRUCTION FIELD SERVICES DEVELOPMENT PLANNING • . PLANNING.&TECHNICAL SERVICES PARKS AND RECREATION DIVISION • _OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5:00 P.M. ON OCTOBER 12, 1990. • REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED v 117 Gre ve I of r►t►i ✓b b:c or-way ti ro vend,1713 Shall b.c rel v:red XApplicarrk Shall 501) 14 A composiie r/g1I Sh0-.1 g q)I 1.11illrics and. PI pro File of s-lorrvl aid .Sari+ay\ Sew&r5 5;2e 2..2 '�)( 311/ Show'•) all cross;ng/ And -f hat minivrivrh Separ444_, ark �' S`tor►n rind sewer- S 11 to wq i haInr'M�11'1 Se Wer and wafer ' 101 wall 90 wall, ) 811YetliCAI W q f-er al Si-B(rh — 7'5 r I✓a l l to wall /� _ vl i nCA . 4nydo'vns l��uwl x 1`11'n l✓n�W► S I Z2 0 � S g N I TG r7 Se.w•e.r �cr S O-I Stibs4gndol(d MA l✓� 5tIqii be ves:zed Apesa gemi� Ctal1 ihves1-1, . o±he..r' a 1'Icena .rw-saA ia►^y w�rrv�fi�lrgvl t/ x , erl 'ICaf1o1 iS 'Mad.e- Kri ,� .prv�der�j C�rnne��- b.Q ._Y.efve • by a) showy\ . w� ` ,I , eve-elf, DATE: lo111 O SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 5/90 devrvshl • REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: f-P6-Aut-ut- • APPROVED ✓ APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED usujt,Lu • 1N\0-4-6 6-3‘)~7;"'"ii- tsr\ LT- C toAl-'1V-) 1211_6_,1 ()-4"\ TrI..4—Cit 4) fu—et CA 4-0 M 4R 4 �, XR, C�(A,Iw f�l o- a-t ` ' 6/ MWW c)); DATE: /0 2,1 f U SIGNATURE F DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 5/90 devrvshl �. DIyISICN•..! .�, .� PPLANNING®—� DEPARTM`Et1T OF PLANNING/BUILDING/PIL LIC WORKS ono i.,`IJ I ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET OCT 12 1990 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Police DATE CIRCULATED: 9/27/90 COMMENTS DUE: 10/12/90 ECF-116-90 APPLICATION NO(S): PP;RVMP-116-90 PROPONENT: John Krehblel/Woodland Investments PROJECT TITLE: West View Addition BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:.A preliminary plat to subdivide 3.68 acres into 12 single-family home lots. •LOCATION: NE corner of SR 405 and Sunset Blvd (approx. 1800 NE 12th) SITE AREA: 3.68 BUILDING AREA (gross): N/A IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS: PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT \ NECESSARY 1. Earth • . 2. Air • • ' 3. Water 4. Plants 5. Animals ' 6. Energy&Natural Resources . 7. 'Environmental Health 8. Land &Shoreline Use • .9. Housing • 10. Aesthetics • 11. Light&Glare ' 12. Recreation 13. Historic&Cultural Preservation . 14. Transportation 15. Public Services 16. Utilities 1%1 t c e. COMMENTS: ^,t I-ca.Ki, 'uoye- aik„ 14(.66 Mal ifuut)-u +f,11%. 40154, /14, 0 , • We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable Impact or areas where additional Information is needed to properly assess this proposal. ii6j/VAAO-- 1612A6 Signature of Directoiair AutrUized Representative Date Rev. 6/88 envnrshl 10. Aesthetics • • 11. Licht & Ginn) 12. Recreation 13. Historic&Cultural Preservation 14. Transportation 15. Public Services 16. Utilities �r COMMENTS: --T S- We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which•we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Director or Authorized Representa ve Date Rev. 6/88 • envrvshl • • REVIEW COMMENTS • PRELIMINARY PLAT(NE 12TH ST. &KENNEWICK) JOHN KEHBIEL • Oct. 10, 1990 1. NE 12th St. roadway improvements to provide: • o Curb, gutters, sidewalk and Street lighting. 2) Provide street light drawing for cul-de-sac roadway. DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS • DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF-116-90 APPLICATION NO(S).: PP;RVMP-116-90 PROPONENT: John Krehblel/Woodland Investments PROJECT TITLE: West View Addition • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: A preliminary plat to subdivide 3.68 acres Into 12 single- family home lots. LOCATION: SEC: 8 TWNSHP: 23N RNG:5E NE corner of SR 405 and Sunset Blvd (approx. 1800 NE 12th) TO: PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION SCHEDULED TAC DATE: 10/19/90 ENGINEERING SECTION • TRAFFIC ENG. SECTION UTILITIES ENG. SECTION ••• I I FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU • S POLICE DEPARTMENT • DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION I . CONSTRUCTION FIELD SERVICES ' DEVELOPMENT PLANNING • PLANNING &TECHNICAL SERVICES PARKS AND RECREATION DIVISION OTHERS: ' COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5:00 P.M. ON OCTOBER 12, 1990. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: fire- cuCmL" .lVt- APPROVED z---1CFPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED • Any development and/or construction shall comply with current Fire and Building Codes and Ordi- nances. A seesisd means of approved access is required. Fire D_eppartment access roads/lanes shall be paved minimum width 20'; minimum height 13' 6". Yes •—'"IVo • Preliminary fire flow calculations show a fire flow of /t lrrro is required. / hydrants with a minimum flow of I, eftrc gpm each is required. Primary hydrant is required to be within .30o feet of the structure. Secondary hydrants are required to be wilhig feet of the structure. 1-1 --,i - ,cam 6 ao -e • An approved automatic sprinkler system is required to protect the total structure. Yes No !All fire department access roads are to be paved and installed prior to construction. Yes 4No ;All fire hydrants are required to be installed and approved prior to construction. Yeso DATE: 4,7f: "Jf /974 SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 5/90 damsni • DEPARTMEN PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBL,°`.`WORKS DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW S....ET ECF-116-90 APPLICATION NO(S).: PP;RVMP-116-90 PROPONENT: John Krehblel/Woodland•Investments PROJECT TITLE: West View Addition • • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: A preliminary plat to subdivide 3.68 acres into 12 single- - family home lots. • LOCATION: SEC: 8 TWNSHP: 23N RNG: 5E (approx. 1800 NE NE corner of SR 405 and Sunset Blvd 12th) TO: • PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION SCHEDULED TAC DATE:.10/19/90 • ENGINEERING SECTION TRAFFIC ENG. SECTION • . UTILITIES ENG. SECTION . FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU • POLICE DEPARTMENT • DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION CONSTRUCTION FIELD SERVICES DEVELOPMENT PLANNING • PLANNING &TECHNICAL SERVICES • 1 PARKS AND RECREATION DIVISION . OTHERS: . c COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5:00 P.M. ON OCTOBER 12, 1990. • REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: Wit APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED in prop e•vn¢n"IS RV1 cal- e 4ert,st`o n.f X segw'ree �O�ahs 5hoi Crrn Ari -10 Cil y 0f le�ivi .Slavidaeds r,���,,rco(, ()laws • Ott/d oPerf �� I�,�,sior of Gt'lf v+1II-Hes 1 . •Ic rNinih ivn roveme�t-f or{ rel(A rcd kw' no¢ /it.i-co 10 lie rol owuzy,1 �' may Acdcca jnst�1Irnfi of $-InGk wa-�ec%wta'n �n i drar"I� as sl1d,✓h o►1 loreI ►v�, nofry rI4 p )GnJ -- �nSfQlla+Ich of F;'rc I-I � as e n d Domes-Vic 1I/a e r Scrvice.s rerivtd . II A Ilcablt stsati►,t dweic icvd- fees/.p ✓')l: ) 1�11'' . S���ccf 4 t a feiclueId 're s ► NUew-s he,-1 I /4:1 " Qv ( DATE: r0/12//0 SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 5/90 dovrvsht ..u....�.•..�--_"_'`..�.A^ r-R r r'_._.;r. YIc‘wMLUANwmuospwrwou,kwirn':w.l,v:uu41.•`gP —... .:•;ICE APPLICATION: ,r1, DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW Sl 'i LJ ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SIILET ' / ❑ PLAN REVIEW ROUTING SLIP j ' `' ❑ �, OTHER • APPLICANT: ..� DATE: /teiCS��Q ( JOB ADDRESS: ' , KS-di Ds-� / . N 1 si`/' J�/rod 12?%) ►1 NATURE OF WORK: ��`�� 7 •1.4e v r 1 a. `.t..) PROPERTY MANAGEME T fe// //qQ DATE RECEIVED Comments ue BY PROP RTY MGMT. iv /a/jn Comments or suggestions regarding this application should be provided in writing. Please provide comments to the Comm.Dev.Dept.(C.D.D.)by 5:00 p.m.on above date. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION fES APPLIED CANNOT APPLY ES El EGAL DESCRIPTION ❑NEED MORE INFORMATION ❑ SQUARE FOOTAGE , ❑ FRONT FOOTAGE ❑ VICINITY MAP It is the Intent of this development fee analysis to put the developer/owner on notice,that the fees quoted below will apply to the subject site upon development of the property. All quoted fees are due and payable at the time the construction permit is Issued to install the on-site and off-site improvements(i.e. underground utilities,street; improvements,etc.) • PROJECT COST LATECOMER LATECOMER AGREEMENT-WATER NO. PER. FTG. FEE CITY HELD ._.0— PRIVATE DEVELOPER HELD .. _ .. LATECOMERS AGREEMENT-SEWER ' CITY HELD ©� PRIVATE DEVELOPER HELD --• 0 — SPECIAL UTILITY CONNECTION CHARGE-WATER • UNITS SUCC FEE Single family residential dwelling unit$940/lot x j it a.8Q. /D Apartment, Condo,each multiplex unit$545/ea.unit x • Commercial/Industrial $.126/sq.ft.of property x (not less than $940.00) SPECIAL UTILITY CONNECTION CHARGE-SEWER Single family residential dwelling unit$470/lot x 1 A. 45�L j DD Apartment, Condo,each multiplex unit$270/ea.unit x Commercial Industrial$.063/sq.ft.of property x (not less than $470.00) SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT(Ho spital Area)WATER UNITS ' SAD FEE 'j Developments with 1500 'M Fire lows or Less: Area Charge$0.034 'er ft.x Frontage Charge$16.1 1 per front ft.x ;, Developments with Greater th 500 GPM Fire Flows: Area Charge$0.04 er q.ft.x Frontage Charge 8.00 p•r front ft.x SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT(Honey Crk, Intercptr)-SEWER UNITS SAD FEE Area Charges: • Residential d elling uni ,apartments or equivalen $25 i per dwelling unit x Commercial dev op ent: $.05 per sq.ft.of . oss site area x Front Footage Charges: $37.19 per Frq t Ft. .n ea.side)x $74.38 per Pk.Ft. (prpt on both sides of imprv.)x -- D TOTAL: $ HD/ �I aid. p4 no above quoted Nos do NOT include/ Illrpuction toes,slit.sewer psnulfa,r/w punts!' loom or Ihu coil al wailer meters. • f ct.4.4,,,,.. k . et-- „ , Signature of Director or Authorised Ropresontatiy DATE ��. G)e0 ins/fa.Ulagr/bh f 1,0 • • viso ::mittee ii ii : > ::::> ;> • � �::T>::>:�;�r :ni.:.alAd I or">. :oinm ee ........................ ............................ : :M EET I `: :: : : TI<.: .:::::::::»>::::: : > ::......: >: : :::::»: ::: : :<:>:' T 1NG NQT �E April 12, 1991 To: Gregg Zimmerman Rebecca Lind Gary Gotti Sam Chastain E....„, Bryant Jim Hanson FroI/ Penny on Erickson, Chairman Mg- Me::::tnDat _ April 12 :.,. g�� '..�: > < :...: < >< > > >,:.:: �>> ..ee ..9....�.�....... . .April y2,.1�.91.:::::�:::.:::.:::.:. :Tirri:;:::>: ::::: ::: ::: ::::::: :::.p eati,.n 5 + T``.'.::F.�: ..r::�;; nferen :R rn>: ? :>:> ? 2 > �: 2 : % : a:: o.......o...... ..... ......... .....:hf.dloo::: .p::..e ::fie..: Q.p::.:::.: ::: :::::: ::::::.�:.. ::: :::.::.:: ..::. ::::..::.: :.:.m..::.:.. . Agenda is listed below. TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE AGENDA APRIL 12, 1991 Third Floor Conference Room Commencing at 8:30 AM TIME/KEY PARTICIPANTS NEW PROJECTS • US WEST FUEL TANK ECF-028-91 Applicant seeks permission to abandon; in place, an existing 1,000 gallon diesel fuel tank, which is no longer being used, located under an existing building. The project is located at 225 Williams Ave S. WEST VUE PRELIMINARY PLAT ECF;PP;RVMP-116-90 A preliminary plat to subdivide 3.68 acres into 12 single- family home lots. The project site is located on the NE corner of SR 405 and Sunset Blvd (approx. 1800 NE 12th). PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF RENTON CITY OF RENTON APR 9 1991 CE ED MEMORANDUM DATE: April 8, 1991 TO: Mark Pywell FROM: Kim Scattarella SUBJECT: WEST VIEW PLAT LEVEL 1 DOWNSTREAM ANALYSIS COMMENTS After review of the Level 1 Downstream Analysis for West View Addition Preliminary Plat, I have the following comments: 1. Sketch Number 2, which was documented in the report as containing the map of the downstream drainage was omitted in this report. The very top portion of a City Storm Drainage inventory map was xeroxed on the bottom of page 6, which appears to be Sketch No. 2. 2.. On page 7, the use of a level spreader at outfall for re-dispersing the flow is mentioned as an alternative for drainage discharge downstream. This type of system is not acceptable to the City. Tight-lining drainage down to Park Drive would be an acceptable alternative here. Energy dissipation may be required, and Core Requirement No. 4 in the King County Surface Water Design Manual shall be addressed. 91-284:KDS:ps CC: Randall Parsons Gregg Zimmerman RPR-84 .1991 12:47 COLLINS & ASSOCIATES 286 867 9378 P.01 COL11NS & ASSOCIATE CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEERS AND PLANNERS Phone (206) 885-0102 FAX TRANSMITTAL tAivNNG '/ °N iV DATE: 'S� p((�'qy � '99' TO: /9Z.G2/ � r FROM: • • TOTAL PAGES (including transmittal) : • 8195 — 166th Ave. NE — Suite 101, Redmond, WA 98052 P.O. Box 2332, Redmond, WA 98073 • " .,2 1e-e/ ,,, /7.a , • 7le�yPi c�2 li ygo/ /"e�/ S700',e::(7 APR-04,1991 12:47 COLLINS & ASSOCIATES 206 867 9378 P.02 COLLINS & ASSOCIATES CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEERS AND PLANNERS Phone (206) 885-0102 West View Level One Downstream Analysis Job Number 1147 L K I: Aft t-r‘ O �w *.Cd._�v.a 1's4 NAL'tlk March 12, 1991 Prepared by: Michael K. Haley P.E. Reviewed by: Kevin R. Collins P.E. 8195 — 166th Ave. NE — Suite 101, Redmond, WA 98052 P.O. Box 2332, Redmond, WA 98073 , APR-04-1991 12:48 COLLINS & ASSOCIATES - 205 867 9378 P.03 :r0- I3 f-Lc 1B El- 11 A-`1 O vervie w The proposed project is located on a 3.5 acre site approximately 500 feet West of Aberdeen Avenue N.E. and just South of N.E.. 12th Street in the City of Renton. The Southern boundary of this odd triangular shaped parcel is formed by the Right-of-way of State Route 900, also known as N.E. Park Drive. To the North and East of the site are single family dwellings. Approximately 200 feet West of the site is Interstate 405. The site will be subdivided into 12 single family lots served by the addition of a 32 foot wide street extending South from N.E. 12th Street approximately 300 feet and terminating in a cul-de-sac. Storm water runoff will be collected from all impervious surfaces and routed by a pipe system to an open detention pond at the Southeast corner of the site. Discharge from the pond will flow in a Bioswale paralleling the Southern boundary and ultimately flowing to the original discharge location along the Southwest property line. The site generally slopes from the Northeast to the Southwest at approximately 9%. Near the Southern and Western boundary of the site the slope increases to approximately 33% . The undeveloped site is covered by second growth woods and forest. The underlying soil is composed of Indianola sandy loam with a hard pan layer occurring at 2 to 5 feet of depth. APR-04-1991 12:48 COLLINS & ASSOCIATES 206 867 9378 P.04 3-13-9) O ffsite Drainage Condition The offsite drainage area to the site is limited by the adjacent • developments to be approximately 5.7 acres in size. The drainage area is defined by the following: beginning at the Southeast corner of the site and following the natural topographic divide extending Northeast to the intersection of Aberdeen Avenue N.E. and N.E. 12th Street; beginning at the West tip of the property and following the natural topographic divide extending Northeast to a point of intersection with the center line of N.E. 12th Street and extending East to the intersection with Aberdeen Avenue, (refer to drainage area sketch No. 1) . This description of the offsite drainage area is conservative in that it ignores the channelization effects of urbanization. For instance, this drainage divide formed by N.E. 12th Street may be further influenced by road side ditches which actually direct flow to the West rather than onto the site. However, for the purpose of this analysis the offsite flow conditions are conservatively simplified. r �/ iv, v 1 I I 1 \ ,."ae0 --i'7�:11 l 8 I� • i• `. ' . : � i - \\ w Alm - • . 1 •.� , 'Pi,es • ':, _ /8 (,.- • 'i. . . :), . —ram � lii — I/ \..10 ) . -. 1 1 F .\--,1.\ ,\r- -i.- ,_-�� - ir. —= ; IF J, 1. •w srt11 CIO A1:pp171013 �f. -' �_` '3 �' • II`` � M� .� �Tz,41N its j• _ 'I `. �,^- �`� 1 ti� -�.' !l- I 1 o k •139 AeZ�•�4- • -� JEN ' 'c.). T :/1 :< < ()) II I: th '1-t1S l\4i • ) J)I '''' (7/1 q .....,,-..\\,..< • I. - -. _ - I, v f ,i; \ `. . - i it 1 \. ,. �� • ....J .'_ — hl ,i,:. I/ -0.....A\ I ' ,.fil' I __.*.___J)1: 1-7.'-' 10MIa......, . \ \) ,------11'—.1.---,,,..,-1 LA3 `11‘ __ -:' ----_:, • \.. .1 ..\41* '.-- ot JL_ fs 7.7/ .. - -. II 1;\\,, , ) .-- , _ie. --W--- ,_, • "•--. : -. -_•L -1•• • \--'s: . ,WORAP1141 ; ‘ -91 i rj - — - - I • .%• - .‘- ‘‘' \ 1.• ,/ it • \\• ,,,-- :i • ../414.3174M j 11(.• I.(1 LC,,,_,. ; _/-/. 42 • ir-!•• • • 291 / -- ---/f-- --__ ___- _,• .•• 1 -- 4,7 -\..., ---/- i. k•••:".. -%.•.--i\l.% -ri-,1.-e .0 i.6i.. N R off!... v--a4h-.4-i:i `~ i . llkr.. \ -. s•...� :, I: \ ;. s.. ,ems__ r.—� ,mil �� \+f. ii sr - --- �� .1\1tok--.,,-_,-.-...z/.f- - ki---Ni.m1-1,ti_‘- B�d I `i.,..� \l 31 . ,.\\\ __._ ‘,.. _, .1 ......,:- __...... .. i7. .,,.- - -..-,:.-i.„.-ii. ._ .„. . ,. ______ .... ._ • . , :: ip 1 1 L------111114, Mil— . '"' ,.,\\\\ . .?, ....., —it , if . ::: ,,, ...::._ ...1,._ ••• ..--; . . \\ • •.i..)• i V li \s‘q '.1, :::-., ':`, : . . ,., X 433 . . \.=--+ \1 i ..4 Q ill, L • ..".`., ;•,,, . \'‘, J i ' •• • _ ..:\ (,_ 61 NA , ..';',.,,,, 2 2. ; --. • . • •,_/,---,d , 1 . c S. /tC- •.o l ... j ter. I A. • �' 432.,,E }.`a, ,i - �ti, -4. I `\ 11/,�► :�• •, I •• •t�� - �'`� • _mi l \, .. -SDY , j. 111 \ i�1/. _.. - • I.ti� P • , ' I /r�.�I •N•.. ' ^i'Powei Plant• ' / -.. % .- `l� , , , .. '' il' - r • ., �� ,'t' ,.....,....‘", 'if."....::.:':'::.,:';',•••:•; :a./ ' \''',111 f‘its,.•• 12'30" 51=FS►T1 l�rA, 1Q' 563 • . •N11 H..•N 5 ;') A-L • I I,MILE -, I-- a g IT kr�-{} ' Heavy-duty.. moo o loon = 3 .s EET Medium-duty H . 1-7 ---- 1 .5 fl U , ,, .-� wASHINGT,ON C • . • NATIONA I , • QUADRANGLE LOCATION . Sa'd 8L26 2,98 90Z SSld 190SSd '8 SN 11103 67:zT T66T-t%0-eIdd ' e1PR-04-1991 12:50 COLLINS a ASSOCIATES 206 867 9378 P.06 ' 8 114-1 Downstream System Off and on site flows are directed to the Southwest down a slope of 33% which is channelized in a number of locations below the site. At the bottom of the slope is the North ditch and shoulder, of State Route 900 which collect most, if not all, of the runoff from the site. The ditch is asphalt lined and parabolic in cross section. The grade of the ditch forces runoff to the West along State Route 900 and toward Interstate Route 405. Just prior to the 405 overpass of Route 900 the ditch discharges into a 24 inch concrete culvert which • carries the runoff to the West under Interstate 405. At the West side of the overpass the culvert discharges into a ditch which parallels Interstate 405 and immediately flows into another cul- vert/pipe system which proceeds West along the North side of State Route 900. The pipe system, composed of 36" Corrugated Metal Pipe, proceeds to the West for approximately 1400 feet at which point it discharges into a pond (refer to sketch No.2). 9- 4-G(n 100. 2 i s .A,S S o/►1 , APR-E14-1991 12:51 COLLINS & ASSOCIATES 206 867 9378 P.07 uJ CSTy i tsto 71-1T i TIOvJ Sow kREiBi L {11 Problem Analysis ` Throughout the downstream system no evidence was present to indicate an existing drainage problem. With respect to the proposed site, drainage problems will be minimized with the addition of the detention pond and bioswale. Limiting the site peak discharge to predeveloped levels for the 2 and 10 year storms will retard erosion of the downstream system. The bioswale will function as a water quality devise and an erosion control mechanism by maintaining low flow velocities. Concentrated flow at the outfall of the bioswale is one condition of the proposed drainage 'system that will adversely affect the downstream system. The existing runoff condition at the South property line may be assumed to be shallow concentrated flow prior to discharging over the 33% slope. The actual peak discharge for the design storm may not differ from the predeveloped level. However, the concentration of flow over a given area will increase due to the channelization of flow. This may cause some added stress on the existing system downstream. e T! s ' �► Rccept ettJif Tye/ hde eAclie, d*4v - AP t? °ens've, is Pao 4 ce . 1'77 The use of a level spreader at the outfall of the bioswale is one way of redispursing the flow. By turning the bioswale along the existing contour and providing a large flat depressed area the runoff will • disburse and weir flow toward the steep slope. The specifics of this design will be addressed in the Engineering plans after preliminary Rim-- , approval. C.zkrFc Tb St vt r' K • 3� • • • 4•c 4 i _ 1 \ \ N. I \ • \ t \\ . - .s. • • 1�a \\ 0 �• `1• \• \\\ I I '�tctrlCl4 3 \ n' _�\ 1 \ jr\ \ \ \ \ \ \ IC:. �\ \ \• •`\ ' gars f1 1 1„0 t 1 1 \ \ \\ �\ \\2 ' 9 'Lbl 45. \ \ \\ \\x. r \ . N ‘ 1 11\ ‹ N. `N. `.• \' \ \ \ \\ - \ P \ �� ' . ....... \\ \ \ \ • p7, -\ ‘ \\, ............'s,, ,... \ - \ \ \ \ \ , \ ‘‘ R... \ \ \ \ \ \ \' \- S.... '7••• N. '\ \ \ \ \r-'r \- \ \.. .. i \ 4 \\ �,� \ 1 I I 1 \1 \ ; . \ • \ \ 1 1 / , 11 11 ! / / IV 1 I\/ . 10 r\ \\ 6 \ '3 _________\ 1 e , 1 4 , , ,, , 1. 1 „ , I '. \ git.‘ jim. \ ss, • 1 1 \ \ ID \ Fp- \ • Wily \ -. v \ \ \ \ 1 \\li o \ e LO cc ozi\t/r.k co ,\,_ . \ ‘. \ . ,,,,.., . ‘ -21 - 8 \ 1 N\ •• • --- 0 Zaa'tS'o- -E '. \ \ ' \ s• \ \ \ • -•• -'. \ .• (.... ), \!i 01 • ,71 • cetullou PoNp I 5 \` w CITE OF RENTON NIL ,i Planning/Building/Public Works Department Earl Clymer, Mayor Lynn Guttman,Administrator March 8, 1991 Steve Malsam c/o Woodland Investment P.O. Box 2257 Woodinville,WA 98072 SUBJECT: West View Addition Preliminary Plat PP-116-90 Dear Mr. Malsam: Staff has completed the initial review of the amended preliminary plat plans you submitted on February 28, 1991. The Planning Review Section has requested that a 1/4 mile downstream level 1 analysis be provided. They state that: "Once the stormwater enters the proposed detention facility in Tract X, it is uncertain where the drainage is being routed after passage through a 200' bio-swale. An acceptable downstream route per City of Renton standards shall be shown as part of the downstream analysis. The shortest path for drainage is to be hard piped downhill to the existing storm system on Park Drive. Property rights for doing this will be needed. An easement for this in accordance with City Standards on private property shall be a requirement of a preliminary plat approval." The information requested above will need to be submitted so that it can be reviewed as part preliminary plat by the Technical Advisory Committee and the Environmental Review Committee. If you have any questions, please contact me at 235-2550. Sincerely, • Mark R. Pyw CP Project Manager 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington' 98055 CITY OF RENTON PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF RENTON MEMORANDUM MAR - 51991 RECEIVED DATE: March 5, 1991 TO: Mark Pywell FROM: Gregg Zimmerman cam. a STAFF CONTACT: Kim Scattarella SUBJECT: WEST VIEW ADDITION The geotechnical report and recently revised site plan have been reviewed. Based on this review, Plan Review has the following recommendations; 1)A 1/4 mile downstream analysis shall be required as part of Environmental review. 2) Once the stormwater enters the proposed detention facility in Tract X, it is uncertain where the drainage is being routed after passage through a 200'bio-swale. An acceptable downstream route per City of Renton Standards shall be shown as part of the downstream analysis. The shortest path for drainage is to be hard piped downhill to the existing storm system on Park Drive. Property rights for doing this will be needed. An easement for this in accordance with City Standards on private property shall be a requirement of a preliminary plat approval. 3) Installation of fire hydrant and domestic water shall be per City of Renton Standards as part Utility Permit review. 4)Minimum size of sanitary sewer is 8-inch to be shown on the site plan. The finished floor elevation for all lots shall be provided to ensure that 2% side sewer can be provided for each dwelling. Provide an access road per City Standards for maintenance of the existing 8" sewer main that is shown in Tract #1. These requirements shall be met and shown prior to preliminary plat approval. 5) Offsite road improvements will be required along NE 12th and for the proposed cul-de-sac, per comments from Transportation shown in the earlier ERC review comments. cc:Randall Parsons Dave Christensen I ., • • '. ° '`' :1_" �'_J'.;,'_:11,. DAVID L. NELSON AND ASSOCIATES, INC. Consulting Engineering,Geology , � 206/788-5612 A ' . � ^,, 13424 Chain Lake Road Monroe, Washington 98272 206/794-4332 PLANNING DIVISION • -, CITY OE RENTCN' November .5; 1990 . II Project No. 14890 FEB 2 8 1991 . RECEIVED Woodland Investment Corp. P. 0. Box. 2257 . Woodinville, Washington 98072 i tReference:, Engineering Geologic Evaluation West View Renton, Washington . • - Gentlemen; • This is to serve as a report of engineering geologic exploration and evaluation services performed within the above referenced project site, as il requested by you. • I- _ .... . INTRODUCTION This report presents our findings, opinions, conclusions and recariu ndations i - ' for development with respect to engineering geologic conditions found within the site. We understand that the West View development is to consist of ii . • twelve residential lots, with an associated access roadway. The'intent of • this report is to.address only lots 9, 10, 11 and 12, and the associated top- of-slope and slope areas within these lot areas. _,Specifically, we. will address the development'and placement of the residences within this area. The . approximate locations of the evaluated areas are shown on the enclosed Location Map, sheet M-1. . • . The scope of services included performance of five (5) exploration backhoe • • (test) pits, performed primarily" along the top=off-slope area within the r sham subject lot areas. The test pits are sho approximately on the enclosed •I Location Map. We also performed visual examination of the steep slope I _ portions of the site, which included digging shallow hand holes, and u DAVID L. NELSON AND ASSOCIATES, INC. ' Consulting Engineering Geology November 5, 1990 Project No. 14890 Page 2 observation of exposed soils within outcrops. This visual examination was performed to provide information with respect to soils, groundwater and slope I -_ stability within portions of the site which were inaccessible to the exploration equipment. In addition, we reviewed available soils and geologic maps of the area, some which are published, and some which are not. 11 FIELD EXPLORATIONS1111 - Our site backhoe explorations and reconnaissance work were performed on October 26, 1990. The backhoe exploration pits were placed near, and behind the top of slope, which was located by others. Exploration locations were determined by tape measurement from the top of slope "line". All elevations mentioned in this report refer to existing grade, and to site layout and . -�" topography shown on an a preliminary plat map'of West View Addition, dated 7/10/90, and prepared by Mead Gilman & Associates. Records of encountered soil types and conditions were maintained in the field and are sunmarized in the exploratory pit logs at the back of this report. Soils observed in the explorations were visually classified in the field. LOCATION & SITE DESCRIPTION The property consists of about 3.68 acres, lying on the south side of NE 12th Street (aka SE 112th St.) , just northeast of I-405, in the city of Renton, Washington. Presently, the site area istiundeveloped. However, the site appears to have been the site of a previously existing residence which was razed, yard areas and driveway. An existing old shed (barn?) occurs just east of the top-of-slope within the proposed lot 12. Topographically, the trend of I _ the terrain slopes gently toward the west within the easterly (upland) portion of the site. West of this area, a top of 25% slope occurs (see location map), which breaks over to a steep westerly trending slope. Vegetation.within the site consists of various sized evergreen and deciduous trees and underbrush. GEOLOGIC SETTING & STRATIGRAPHY Iandforns within this region comprise a system of glacially sculpted features. DAVID L. NELSON AND ASSOCIATES, INC. • El Consulting Engineering Geology November 5, 1990 • Project No. 14890 Page 3 Locally, this terrain and adjacent environs are interpreted to have been glacially modified during the latest glaciation of the Puget Lowland area. " Glacial ice is thought to have last occupied the region during the late Pleistocene epoch, some 11,000 to 13,000 years before present. The latest glacial advance over the area is referred to as the Vashon Stade of the Fraser Glaciation. Evidence of at least four (4) glaciations have been recorded in the Renton area. The geologic literature of the region indicates that this area of Renton is cored at this location by Tertiary Age sandstone/siltstone (bedrock) deposits, and to be capped by Vashon age glacial till. Our explorations within this area did not encounter the Tertiary age bedrock deposits, but rather mostly the glacial till deposits. • The subsurface stratigraphy can best be seen on the enclosed test pit logs. OfIn general,.we encountered at depth a deposit consisting of grey, dense to very dense, poorly sorted silty sand with gravel, considered glacial till. The till was encountered at depths below about 2 to 6.5 feet below grade. Overlying the basal glacial till is a strata of weathered glacial till, consisting of grey-brown, medium dense, gravelly silty sand, found to be about 1 to 1.5 feet thick. . . . Surficial soils encountered within the site vary from native surface soils to artificial fill. Where fill occurs, it was found to consist of about 2 to 5 feet of brown, dark brown, black and grey-brown, loose to medium dense, intermixed and layered, gravelly silty sand, organic silty sand and areas of concrete rubble. .This fill, encountered mostly within the vicinity of the old residence area, appears associated with the old driveway and residence, and to occur near the top of slope area in TP-2 and TP-3. Where the fill is not present, the surface soils were found to consist of. 1 to 1.5 feet of brown loose silty sand with roots, covered with 0.5 feet of topsoil. • I . • DAVID L. NELSON AND ASSOCIATES, INC. .. Consulting Engineering Geology November 5,' 1990 • Project No. 14890 Page 4 11 HYDROLOGIC CONDITIONS 11 Ground water was not observed within the site area. However, indications of seasonal perched water conditions were found along the upper elevations of the 1 glacial till within the weathered till zone. Anticipated perched ground water activity on this property may in part represent interflow. Interflow refers 11 to the movement of ground water through the near-surface soils above an impervious surface, such as the dense glacial till found locally. Interflow seepage tends to be directed into low areas and down gradient. Interflaw is common for upland areas underlain by till soils, and tends to be somewhat seasonal. This type of seepage activity tends to decline markedly during the drier summer months. SLOPE STABILITY The purpose of our test pit explorations and slope reconnaissance work is to determine the general character and stability of the steep slope areas on the site. In this study, slope stability is used to determine the setback and development siting criteria for residence structures upslope. As shown on the Location Map, a top-of-slope "line" is indicated within this • Isite. This line was determined by others, and apparently represents the area below which slopes exceed 25%. Our observations and reconnaissance below the indicated top-of-slope were used to obtai. i general information for our determination of slope stability, and potential impacts to development within this site. No indications of large scale (rotational) or surface landsliding were encountered during our exploration and field evaluation of the site area. We would consider this area to be relatively stable. CONCLUDING OPINIONS General In general, we conclude that the evaluated site area should be suitable for residential development, provided the guideline recarmendations and r, _ DAVID L. NELSON AND ASSOCIATES, INC. Consulting Engineering Geology November 5, 1990 Project No. 14890 Page 5 precautions as presented herein are followed. From a geologic standpoint, the area above and below the top-of-slope p- pe appears relatively stable, and should be capable of supporting the planned development. • Development related improvements within the plat such as paved roads, curbs and gutters, and site drainage control systems should tend to lessen the impact of surface and ground water on the slopes. The undisturbed glacial deposits should provide a reasonable subgrade for support of the anticipated development improvements. Development'Considerations Uncertainties related to building along steep slopes, and in particular unstable areas, are typically arlrlressed by the use of setbacks. The purpose of the setback is to establish a "buffer zone" between dwelling areas and the slope margin so that if a slope failure were to occur, the likelihood of dwelling involvement would be minimized. In a general sense, the greater the setback, the lower the risk. From a geological standpoint, the setback dimension is usually based on certain physical slope characteristics, eg., slope height, surface angle, material composition, hydrology, etc. Other factors such as historical slope activity, rate of regression, type and desired life span of the development are important considerations as well. For this site, we recommend using a mi n i n m, building setback of 25 feet frcan the located top-of-slope "line", as approximately shown on the Location Map.. Protection of the setback and steep slope areas should be perfoaned as required by the City of Renton. Specifically, we recommend that the setback area not be used for placement or storage of fill materials, including "temporary" excavation spoils from building area preparation and excavation. . Any development or encroachment into the setback areas should be evaluated by a specific geotechnical investigation. Reductions in setback areas are ... possible, but only with the additional geotechnical evaluation. We also recc mnmeend•that loose fill found within the setback area be removed and the - areas re-vegetated. Foundations for the structures are best performed where -- 7 " Et . • • DAVID L. NELSON AND ASSOCIATES, INC. Consulting Engineering Geology 1 November 5, 1990 ` Project No. 14890 Page 6 . 1 they extend through all surficial fill and loose soils, and down into the I; dense glacial till. Ili . - Decks and other light weight structures may encroach over the setback line. Foundations for such rovenents within 10 feet oftop-of-slope_ the toprof may require specific design. It should be understood that the closer the • 111 structure. is to the slopes, the more risk there is of future distress. Selective thinning or topping of trees should not be a problem. Cutting of 1 , trees located at or near the bankline, or on the slope could be done as well. We recommend that the root bundle/stump of felled trees on the bankline or • slope face be left in-place. Dumping of soil, sod, clippings or other matter over the slope is not reccau ended. . • Drainage. and Erosion Protection - , • . Roofs and pavements will reduce the surface area available for natural infiltration within the site. .This will in turn increase surface .runoff. We - . • recommend that roof drains, catch. basins or other devices used to collect ILsurface runoff be directed by tight line into the storm drain or other suitable system. Runoff should not be allowed to discharge onto sloping IL ' ground or to saturate foundation areas. Surface drains should be maintained • separately, and not interconnected with foundation.or wall drains. Erosion potential should be considered moderate to severe for stripped areas II .. . with 15% or steeper grades. Erosion potential for areas in which the existing la4 ground cover is left intact, and surface water.,is controlled, is expected • to be unaffected by the proposed development. 01 . ' . , , . USE OF THIS REPORT AND WARRANTY • We have prepared this report for use by Woodland Investments Corp., and their agents for their use. in.planning and preliminary design of a portion of this project. • 1 . • . tl DAVID L. NELSON AND ASSOCIATES, INC. Consulting Engineering Geology November 5, 1990 Project No. 14890 Page 7 AM Within the limitations of scope, schedule and budget for our work, we warrant that our work has been done in accordance with generally accepted practices 'a followed in this area at the time the report was prepared. No other warranty, . expressed or implied, is made. Thank you for the opportunity to be of service. If there are any questions concerning this report or if we can provide additional services, please,feel free to call on us at any time. 11 • Sincerel Y. DAVID L. MESON & ASSOCIATES, INC. David L. Nelson, PG • Professional Engineering Geologist • DIN:kam • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 1 - • Leo - 7\ '' ' ••/ '.. .... IIw . • .\\\\ • \�O • Z� ill . . t1/4'° l'10 \4° • tip i?° Leo ems, \ . . • • • an...\\, am. 40...• . a f \ . iZ * Illii):-. 5...' . . . ): ). " /P . \ . I. : \\- :_.2 . '\%,:. Lotr--1). Tr ' \ •. \ • I1 A zs'o slo• 10 • k ” , `INN. \\• . . - •\5' • 1 LOATtO . . . \ , . . . • \ . • , . • . . • * 76sr P 1 5 . . .1 • DAVID L.NELSON AND ASSOCIATES,INC. Consulting Engineering Geology 206 758.5612 • 13424 Chain Lake Road • Monroe,WA 98272 - 206 7S4.45 2 • uJvsr o� cJ • �/ I [gyp ^ • SCALE �j.1�}�GGp / PROJ. NO. IYpfO f` i DATE /vu1/i17� SHEET F'i/"4 ,4..2144.1: PIT.&-lio. P4.14-, u)E57-vrog/ 141Jr.0. GV nt6 I-6t(.t�c4,/ 64.46G, ?-to-ID It err" mitiM CITY-OF RENTON Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Earl Clymer, Mayor Lynn Guttmann, Administrator October 19, 1990 John Krehbiel c/o Woodland Investments P.O. Box 2257 Woodinville, WA 98072 SUBJECT: West View Addition Preliminary Plat PP-116-90 Dear Mr. Krehbiel: As we discussed on the telephone last week your project has undergone a preliminary review. It has been determined by staff that the following items are needed: 1) A variance request is required for the proposed preliminary plat. Section 9-12-8.X.6.d of the Municipal Code states: "Corner lots shall be platted wider than interior lots as determined by the Building Department". The corner lot on your preliminary plat is narrower than some of the Interior lots and a variance application Is required. An application form and fee schedule has been included for your use. Since the preliminary plat has already been submitted we only require the information listed under item # 7 of the enclosed Variance Application Procedures. 2) Staff is also concerned with the soil stability on the project site, especially in the area of lots 10, 11, and 12. Please submit a soil analysis for the project site. 3) Please indicate what the development plans for lot X are for this tract. Will this be developed for a recreation area, developed as an open space area or left in its natural state? As soon as the information listed above has been submitted we will be pleased to continue the processing of your preliminary plat application. Before we can bring the application to a public hearing we also need a letter signed by all of the property owners indicating that they concur with the proposed preliminary plat. The reason we now require this letter is that in a recent case one of the property owners came to the public hearing and indicated that they did not concur with the preliminary plat. If you have any questions regarding these matters, please call me at 235-2550. Sincerely Mark R. Pywell, AICP Project Manager 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2569 DEPARTIVit'idT OF PLANNING/BUILDING/PLiJJCGWORKS ern'op�ivis10 9 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET ®CT 0 3 ,99® •ti REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: SflcYe� aY� , 1 DATE CIRCULATED: 9/27/90 COMMENTS DUE: 10/12/90 ECF- 116-90 APPLICATION NO(S): PP;RVMP-116-90 PROPONENT: John Krehbiei/Woodland Investments PROJECT TITLE: West View Addition • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: A preliminary plat to subdivide 3.68 acres into 12 single-family home lots. LOCATION: NE corner of SR 405 and Sunset Blvd (approx. 1800 NE 12th) SITE AREA: 3.68 BUILDING AREA (gross): N/A IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS: PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth 2. Air 3. Water 4. Plants 5. Animals 6. Energy& Natural Resources 7. Environmental Health 8. Land &Shoreline Use 9. Housing 10. Aesthetics 11. Light&Glare 12. Recreation 13. Historic&Cultural Preservation 14. Transportation • 15. Public Services 16. Utilities P COMMENTS: 66.„(9,-7.am ,r-9..-�-�sL pz„,„*. 4.7) `f We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. /0 ---- CA Si ature of Director or Authorized Representative Date Rev. 6/88 envrvshl DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF-116-90 APPLICATION NO(S).: PP;RVMP-116-90 PROPONENT: John Krehbiel/Woodland Investments PROJECT TITLE: West View Addition BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: A preliminary plat to subdivide 3.68 acres into 12 single- family home lots. LOCATION: SEC: 8 TWNSHP:23N RNG: 5E NE corner of SR 405 and Sunset Blvd (approx. 1800 NE 12th) TO: PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION SCHEDULED TAC DATE: 10/19/90 ENGINEERING SECTION TRAFFIC ENG. SECTION UTILITIES ENG. SECTION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION CONSTRUCTION FIELD SERVICES DEVELOPMENT PLANNING PLANNING &TECHNICAL SERVICES PARKS AND RECREATION DIVISION OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5:00 P.M. ON OCTOBER 12, 1990. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: APPROVED PROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED -�_ DATE: — � NATURE 0 RECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 5/90 devrvsht DEPARTIVL- T OF PLANNING/BUILDING/PI. SIC WORKS ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET °n•op-tai��s� RFC, ryoy. SEP ° REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: C.oyN% c_AlCrYI Se-rotces 41 4590 DATE CIRCULATED: 9/27/90 COMMENTS DUE: 1 Oil 2/96f CITY OF RENTON ECF- 116-90 RECEIVED APPLICATION NO(S): PP;RVMP-116-90 F7 7 .1990 PROPONENT: John Krehbiel/Woodland Investments g,sa VOOOON PROJECT TITLE: West View Addition BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: A preliminary plat to subdivide 3.68 acres into 12 single-family home lots. LOCATION: NE corner of SR 405 and Sunset Blvd (approx. 1800 NE 12th) SITE AREA: 3.68 BUILDING AREA (gross): N/A IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS: PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth 2. Air 3. Water 4. Plants 5. Animals 6. Energy&Natural Resources 7. Environmental Health 8. Land &Shoreline Use 9. Housing 10. Aesthetics 11. Light&Glare 12. Recreation 13. Historic &Cultural Preservation 14. Transportation 15. Public Services 16. Utilities COMMENTS: V1S+ C.'- _- V) (- `' r � ����" 0 °�+t =� cam" "Yid 0-4-7U w,,e_ We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. 9- Sign/tire of Director or Authorized Representative Date Rev. 6/88 envrvsht • - DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF-116-90 APPLICATION NO(S).: PP;RVMP-116-90 PROPONENT: John Krehbiel/Woodland Investments PROJECT TITLE: West View Addition BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: A preliminary plat to subdivide 3.68 acres into 12 single- family home lots. LOCATION: SEC: 8 TWNSHP: 23N RNG: 5E NE corner of SR 405 and Sunset Blvd (approx. 1800 NE 12th) TO: PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION SCHEDULED TAC DATE: 10/19/90 ENGINEERING SECTION TRAFFIC ENG. SECTION UTILITIES ENG. SECTION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION ONSTRUCTION FIELD SERVICES DEVELOPMENT PLANNING PLANNING &TECHNICAL SERVICES PARKS AND RECREATION DIVISION OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5:00 P.M. ON OCTOBER 12, 1990. REVIEW�INGIDEPARTMENT/DIVISION: �'' APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED fio/ DATE: 9.s? 'f-'5) SIGKIATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 5/90 devivsht DEPARTI-_,AT OF PLANNING/BUILDING/P!�_-f+LIC ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET l 6144 Sep 2 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Si MY C/Ty 440 1 pU, OFF 990 DATE CIRCULATED: 9/27/90 COMMENTS DUE: 167. ,e 93 /ON ECF- 116-90 ��NI�, S�C'/QI`f1 APPLICATIONNG NO(S): PP;RVMP-116-90 w ��,oN OCT PROPONENT: John Krehbiel/Woodland Investments 2 /990 PROJECT TITLE: West View Addition BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: A preliminary plat to subdivide 3.68 acres into 12 single-family home lots. LOCATION: NE corner of SR 405 and Sunset Blvd (approx. 1800 NE 12th) SITE AREA: 3.68 BUILDING AREA (gross): N/A IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS: PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth 2. Air 3. Water 4. Plants 5. Animals 6. Energy&Natural Resources 7. Ern/ironmentaI Health 8. Land &Shoreline Use 9. Housing 10. Aesthetics 11. Light& Glare 12. Recreation 13. Historic&Cultural Preservation_ 14. Transportation 15. Public Services • 16. Utilities COMMENTS: 51-6- hjes r`- •e NPr l4 Re-41111 Dra;4a .fslvi Pre- ' Powns�t-►ern a c S••Ghar5 :$Gia'�j- �e �'n if) e,}( ►S+121 s-�arr� sys a °� n/ E . Park Drive, C F-erre-0( rout,-n Is (4Se4 0 '1 e�sew s114 n be eroctrej Pro✓fi ihk )0 rop Virly OW he( . Cui I cue,-Sac s11a I) l c G v de diGa� ,r4 ,�'�?f- - V We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. 18 2 f0 7 Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date Rev. 6/88 envrvsht a r DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF-116-90 APPLICATION NO(S).: PP;RVMP-116-90 PROPONENT: John Krehbiel/Woodland Investments PROJECT TITLE: West View Addition BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: A preliminary plat to subdivide 3.68 acres into 12 single- family home lots. LOCATION: SEC: 8 TWNSHP: 23N RNG: 5E NE corner of SR 405 and Sunset Blvd (approx. 1800 NE 12th) TO: . PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION SCHEDULED TAC DATE: 10/19/90 ENGINEERING SECTION TRAFFIC ENG. SECTION UTILITIES ENG. SECTION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION CONSTRUCTION FIELD SERVICES DEVELOPMENT PLANNING PLANNING &TECHNICAL SERVICES PARKS AND RECREATION DIVISION OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5:00 P.M. ON OCTOBER 12, 1990. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: STDR,tl APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS n NOT APPROVED I, The, 5 forim; ;. ret.16ile A( 0 I*e f09)P 1 I s ,I,�v,/3M5 ,�ravl. „ -fro P14i W, do if ' , desc.04, ,\P1 iq cc icd gri Z, et, 1 a0 it [-fr1( 1 SG�a II 4� re (A 'vreo'( ,r f c'da,lv70�'!G1 f /61l fe cIvz eJVI;Ov erect 2iCreao(S 5-o&o ter,q. F-/", 3. r .D o rl s Isri,o'4-- 4 V o wed iNi C 4,- ow►- �r ell,0 1� � /I. S a►to f e t ra vf- i o --h is r f ot- ala y be O rca.ld {or hO 1 / P'"tiC G /difit DATE: /02 SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 5/90 devrvsht DEPARTLAT OF PLANNING/BUILDING/P6-JLIC WORK NINGI)v o,, ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET uCT 0 5 ' 90 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: et_hYl £ �� 'te'c." ' 'Ecke. DATE CIRCULATED: 9/27/90 COMMENTS DUE: 10/12/90 ECF- 116-90 APPLICATION NO(S): PP;RVMP-116-90 PROPONENT: John Krehbiel/Woodland'Investments PROJECT TITLE: West View Addition BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: A preliminary plat to subdivide 3.68 acres into 12 single-family home lots. LOCATION: NE corner of SR 405 and Sunset Blvd (approx. 1800 NE 12th) SITE AREA: 3.68 BUILDING AREA (gross): N/A IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS: PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth 2. Air 3. Water 4. Plants 5. Animals 6. Energy& Natural Resources 7. Environmental Health 8. Land &Shoreline Use 9. Housing 10. Aesthetics 11. Light& Glare 12. Recreation 13. Historic &Cultural Preservation 14. Transportation 15. Public Services 16. Utilities COMMENTS: `7e_e We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of proba ct or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Director or Authorized Rep esentative Date Rev. 6/88 envrvsht DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF-116-90 APPLICATION NO(S).: PP;RVMP-116-90 PROPONENT: John Krehbiel/Woodland Investments PROJECT TITLE: West View Addition BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: A preliminary plat to subdivide 3.68 acres into 12 single- family home lots. LOCATION: SEC: 8 TWNSHP: 23N RNG: 5E NE corner of SR 405 and Sunset Blvd (approx. 1800 NE 12th) TO: PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION SCHEDULED TAC DATE: 10/19/90 ENGINEERING SECTION TRAFFIC ENG. SECTION UTILITIES ENG. SECTION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION CONSTRUCTION FIELD SERVICES DEVELOPMENT PLANNING PLANNING &TECHNICAL SERVICES PARKS AND RECREATION DIVISION OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5:00 P.M. ON OCTOBER 12, 1990. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: C t- t,lA I� APPROVED QC`APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED/1%. 9744 Ni DATE: `C1 7) SIGNATURE OF DIRECTO R AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 5/90 devrvsht • 'DEPARTL.,,.JT OF PLANNING/BUILDING/Pl',___IC WORKS ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET °/1).4'4ti0 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: P 1')% �. ,990 DATE CIRCULATED: 9/27/90 COMMENTS DUE: 10/12/90 "be/l NO ECF- 116-90 APPLICATION NO(S): PP;RVMP-116-90 PROPONENT: John Krehbiel/Woodland Investments PROJECT TITLE: West View Addition BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: A preliminary plat to subdivide 3.68 acres into 12 single-family home lots. LOCATION: NE corner of SR 405 and Sunset Blvd (approx. 1800 NE 12th) SITE AREA: 3.68 BUILDING AREA (gross): N/A IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS: PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth 2. Air 3. Water 4. Plants • 5. Animals 6. Energy&Natural Resources 7. Environmental Health 8. Land &Shoreline Use 9. Housing v 10. Aesthetics 11. Light&Glare 12. Recreation 13. Historic&Cultural Preservation 14. Transportation 15. Public Services 16. Utilities A./ COMMENTS: `!1�jr 1/3 "S.) --�� �a.,, T-el /-- -(;) (73 We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. /o[I ' o Signature of Director or Auth ized Representative Date Rev. 6/88 envrvshl DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF-116-90 APPLICATION NO(S).: PP;RVMP-116-90 PROPONENT: John Krehbiel/Woodland Investments PROJECT TITLE: West View Addition BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: A preliminary plat to subdivide 3.68 acres into 12 single- family home lots. LOCATION: SEC: 8 TWNSHP: 23N RNG: 5E NE corner of SR 405 and Sunset Blvd (approx. 1800 NE ' 12th) TO: PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION SCHEDULED TAC DATE: 10/19/90 ENGINEERING SECTION TRAFFIC ENG. SECTION UTILITIES ENG. SECTION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION CONSTRUCTION FIELD SERVICES DEVELOPMENT PLANNING PLANNING &TECHNICAL SERVICES PARKS AND RECREATION DIVISION OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5:00 P.M. ON OCTOBER 12, 1990. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: APPROVED I APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED V.R-Cgb vi m Q.0 b) Q.L..6,0 \k--G'Yv•-QA-1)J1LE-A•o ()-9S. ?c. --‘ Lt eN1/4--A" \1 � - � uw S► sz Cray-t� �4..6-a-Q.e t cyt e� Zf L DATE: it) // �/10 SIGNATURE E DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 5/90 devrvsht •. „ elegi. ,, DEPARTh:.;JT OF PLANNING/BUILDING/P -,.JLIC WORKS **.-. 4 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEEV/ ? > 4 °es/ ''°e,,i3, A- 1990 0 11 II I `?- fit(' ' i REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: S2c.Jer UT11-Ale-S �J i i(: DATE CIRCULATED: 9/27/90 COMMENTS DUE: 10/12764 ECF 116-90 of1),NiNG op ie,R� �N APPLICATION NO(S): PP;RVMP-116-90 OCT `•� �, '4 199n PROPONENT: John Krehbiel/Woodland InvestmentsCEllek PROJECT TITLE: West View Addition BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: A preliminary plat to subdivide 3.68 acres into 12 single-family home lots. LOCATION: NE corner of SR 405 and Sunset Blvd (approx. 1800 NE 12th) SITE AREA: 3.68 BUILDING AREA (gross): N/A IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS: PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth 2. Air 3. Water 4. Plants 5. Animals - 6. Energy& Natural Resources 7. Environmental Health 8. Land & Shoreline Use 1 9. Housing 10. Aesthetics 11. Light&Glare 12. Recreation 13. Historic &Cultural Preservation 14. Transportation 15. Public Services -"1°6: Utilities V COMMENTS: ,, , 1 ' ,, l , Sife i$ h o-f in thc_ Sewer' f1oI41-er;v14-7 !4r-et , - C- Sane%4`Giry SeAve4r Sea-fon ill4PS do Show an 6 '1 (-Cancl-aM f'�wer gnet li'lanhales on NE 12-T". ,'1I1 r`nFo(in4$r'on .mall k Pre,1 d okoked rued, ve. FJ'eo( 3 - S,'-I-e r3. N/.r4-ll I-Fl)l1landf Collect-roh i3gsin y, Prot/tctt a pre-(:ni,nary Vi- 1,i-y Gana si=1-e 1Ia,h . 540;-kry se.we✓' revs"eu/• (h ) 1 , • We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to pr perly assess this proposal. KIA .b d d4L ie4 0 (O(0/D Signature of Director or Authorized Representative * Date C Rev. 6/88 envrvshl DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF-116-90 APPLICATION NO(S).: PP;RVMP-116-90 r PROPONENT: John Krehbiel/Woodland Investments PROJECT TITLE: West View Addition • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: A preliminary plat to subdivide 3.68 acres into 12 single- family home lots. LOCATION: SEC: 8 TWNSHP: 23N RNG: 5E NE corner of SR 405 and Sunset Blvd (approx. 1800 NE 12th) TO: PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION SCHEDULED TAC DATE: 10/19/90 ENGINEERING SECTION TRAFFIC ENG. SECTION UTILITIES ENG. SECTION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION CONSTRUCTION FIELD SERVICES DEVELOPMENT PLANNING PLANNING &TECHNICAL SERVICES PARKS AND RECREATION DIVISION OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5:00 P.M. ON OCTOBER 12, 1990. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: e..1r— APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED FvI11 de.v&lop rate) p✓h�tc rhfi-ar-W�j rayrove-f 5h4 rer;reA, X A�plicant Shall 5017014 Gl con posII'e 101ai Shoe, RJl t ,1-tli-ief and pro Fr)e oE storm avid S4vii*a✓y Sewers/ s;�2 2Z"x3ti✓ show•nq all GV'o.SSIvlf Rnd -fh ri ft)'+1i✓�1v� Syarez'f-rovt' are na.�; �/ V c±ortn gna Sat/ t 11 f o wq J1 Se iv and wok, 7 1(0 ' wall 4-0 wally 18';ve(* � {MrnI'4a4uvrl W a art! ,5-1-61rn — 7,S 1 Wa II o w011 X I%n,rvnvw, Si o F Saoi key c, 1 s g- a , y w sfre auwl tikbs4,010 date ! r?' 5Clq'Gl be up5;z . X 4& e S1,10II ^' rn' vestr3 o�Gt a I na `v��rtn.t�4ry.seu&r'ro4fie2 1., Ip ��`, v'er1�r C q l l o rl '�s '"'i Ord, � . t'a����rojder�r �v►�na�/l b� ��/�✓e.�, � v ��- 457 shot, '✓1C-Olt (146 DATE: jU//il 0 SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 5/90 devrvsht • • floLl I�I�VJ'�� O °j 1,0 p�c'C 113n �'S i M � rim 1 9 -1,l • Sao o peg �n �9)_—O'11l� 1-�9��c� f y J . .. . . ... • ' ' cd 1 --••••. z ::i !fl 1 ----4 s •' . ,01.1 \ ...... . . . ... , ., ....''''....... .... _ .. .. • • vie ....._ --. - . 7 - Pig 1 ----t. ."71P 7•••=1111741 " — .....li rc7.. .... -..„....2 / „ . .. . ..i;:: ',•:i: •,.. • i :..; '4' ',..,; ;.':. '‘+ ', . ; •:, . .....: ..,:z i ; ....... ...•. • . ... . . . . ' • ' , ,ws„ ,. .-. ,• $ •• •__ . ....------ ....... t. ......,...,...,..,..:::-...,.=..;.....,..... :;'..91..t.;',. 1 / / f 0 ""`" ---- .. ; . V ( •110 .... 1 :,....:• !.::. ;., 1,----,::••••••••;-•-• 1 .• 2; ',.... ',..`; 0 1 • --... .... -.:"."-, •••., .. I ........ .i n.,.., : ,...... ,..,.. (!)... 4 - - ,- .z. '" (r.,-.)..., . ... :• „.... ..,,,.;.... ..$..,.7....... .„,.. ...., i_, .:...i.........: n:„......:,.....„.....•.. • ••. .. ....• : . .i. "...,..wir: ,•...... ,......r• ....)- , . .. ..1Lozv) • •f :.::. i . 1 ,1 ;,....::..., .... ..., ,.. .. • • . .i. ..c):: ,.. ,... (P„0...- -1....:.::.....*-, '-',..;••ft*' ••• E 1 ii N \lib101',. \ • . , ..•i;.•; t.°‘ ; ..*. ...° ". i .•• -®•c•••:.,Z. -•••,-8 .,t ' • •.' ,, : :::-i., ...: • . ,.... '.... ? ./i-K7,„.` : :•!.i-- :::, t"', .,.., --. , : ,' .„i -•, . . ,`. •:,•• 1. :-----1---=•.. •. , ,...-•, • .'. -, , ... •• ,a „ . ., i.: . , -.....) -.. • • .,,,,i ''-'0... iir"; •:-.:- .1, ''' ./". ..;:j..,.' • — 0 \ 4 ...... ‘s. \. •-:....\. - .. , is • :::::,.. s.::: • ! .. ..,,,..• , :..T. 4., .- i..x.::::..... ,'.. •••". 0- -,..."..,. '...',/(Eib9:47..Z.I,..; ...a . ....• ` •P n .... • .._ .. • .,. .. . .. 1 ., - ,....•••• f ‘% , • , 3 -••"'• .•'..... ; ...--.....•.-..6 447„....... .. c)..:,0, „..„ e ..ii....‘„ ... ,A, . / , • , i , a •:% .....•• , ,...,. ,:...® ® i i -• ,.. . . .. ,.. , It.;--y,.. • • • -r) - ...:: , gar C* 0 0/ .: _ . ....... ......... ...._... .>-.VT .% g• II ® ... '.......... • „,.: '77 i .... ,c‘.. f;•;•'• c".: ... '...'i:C; '.:5..! '...:!,..) :.‘S.:',/ ••••.:„:i 10 A , • . ) ( ,I..... : .(.. (..t.t) ( ;;1 •/;"(Eti% (1••• :'• ).1 C5.!.(.%.„•••::..) •••::- •- ... •••.:': ,:-:-/ \::::/ •••:::/ "...:: s.:.- ',..; ; '...., ' . .;,,,,.....: ••.„,,li,......„„ i !••. : - """....... ... /:,_ •i • : ''•••••' •••• • ., . v• • •• .... , .... (... • 5......,.... ....., ... .... - ® ....,.... ...........1 . \ ... ..............,.... ••••• 4), ....... ,.........„ /. . .% .... / . .........-.:.. ...:.......-.-- ,. • ,•••,,,,..<,: -,..,.. ' .„...... . „. . // ,,,........,-- ... ..•:.:•.:•:':':: :::::',;;-i-s\•-0,. ..„....-'''"-S.„---/P,,, ' '' ....--- ...----. • 1 .,.................. ,. ......® ...............i.....b......".............. ........l.....--- . ....:'.',........".....''',.......:: ::...-.......„-.::•1•:..1...:: :. =i:•1•K / ..---•' ,..•• . , ...,......... '...,..0,'" i i • ••(''. ? ,:',•• ..........---". .....--;.:::::;;;;.f......f.::-..:::-...,......„ „,• .- .„••--' .....• , . . . •••.... ..., ... •'"-Vir‘ 0.::•::::.;.. - NJ 7 . ••• . ." .. .i, -• 11 .1.f::.:::::;?5•.!.::.:::.::::'*" .a 0 i . .. ...,,,,m*:•".• ..,... / ...i, ...:c) •. 1,v .... , ..„.0.„...,.•• ... --.--- -6 ..:00-....---• . .•••. .. .... \ ..... : .....,'''.... ,.---:....%::'.'::••••• ( .,......'• ;1-:. • ‘' ..."4 .) . . I:•'..:.:' .- , 1.1.0 ....• .... ... • ,.., \ \... , ,‘ ..••• • • L.>.....!...„.., ......v;,,...... \ , ..„........„..,..r..7.• . ....------ ® . ..•••". .... ...„... .s.„. ..A,4„. --"-i•ttall •••:.',..2!.%.••••- '''.. *... -:: •... c.:•:' ,... ..:."4141 ..••• ••••,' ....,. - -•.....- '''--i•i .x-:-.‘..% if2) •••••••••••-• ....•••-• . • •-•„,„\ "-, •••••••>-...44 •••• -, •.,•.% -.:5, r-s• ., , 1 • ." •••\"4-k#• • ..1r-* 't„ ,:<.,$:k„,,,,..„ \ . ‘........ \ \\... .. .•••••:r '' ' 0 •OM .....,:,,,,X.:`.:.• 40„, \ \ ',4%, /' , , %,..,. .k.b.% L• "k '''. \ \‘'. .•,:"••-:.:,..., •••••••.•.,..... e I ..... - ,..,...,„ .I. 1 . . --. . -- . ....* -4,.. g:1 r.ix, & \ ....\N. •. ap imilau. / p f ) • ' / ''.., T -c sn ,/, ..%<..ti:::7# %.;r••• •%. .b› ,...;>. .••••• „----- / <:Z:°...:*.:.... , *•,•%$.,,,,, ( ' / .. •., • / / ...Z:;%•111h,A0 'lb Y_1I7 6-0 ppi- 0 3) Go — DEPARTIIiiEAT OF PLANNING/BUILDING/PL,,,'IC WORKS C PLANNING icim 9 6v ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET - off 1 Z 1990 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Pp1iCe ifiECIV DATE CIRCULATED: 9/27/90 COMMENTS DUE: 10/12/90 ECF- 116-90 APPLICATION NO(S): PP;RVMP-116-90 PROPONENT: John Krehbiel/Woodland Investments PROJECT TITLE: West View Addition BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: A preliminary plat to subdivide 3.68 acres into 12 single-family home lots. LOCATION: NE corner of SR 405 and Sunset Blvd (approx. 1800 NE 12th) SITE AREA: 3.68 BUILDING AREA (gross): N/A IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS: PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT . NECESSARY 1. Earth 2. Air 3. Water 4. Plants 5. Animals 6. Energy& Natural Resources 7. Environmental Health 8. Land &Shoreline Use 9. Housing 10. Aesthetics 11. Light &Glare 12. Recreation 13. Historic& Cultural Preservation . 14. Transportation 15. Public Services 16. Utilities COMMENTS: Po W �" u(,� V , 4ti /S't (cam' ' We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. ,Je-/ JOIN() Signature of Direct r Autlidized Representative Date Rev. 6/88 envrvsht DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF-116-90 APPLICATION NO(S).: PP;RVMP-116-90 PROPONENT: John Krehbiel/Woodland Investments PROJECT TITLE: West View Addition BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: A preliminary plat to subdivide 3.68 acres into 12 single- family home lots. LOCATION: SEC: 8 TWNSHP: 23N RNG: 5E NE corner of SR 405 and Sunset Blvd (approx. 1800 NE 12th) TO: PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION SCHEDULED TAC DATE: 10/19/90 ENGINEERING SECTION TRAFFIC ENG. SECTION UTILITIES ENG. SECTION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION CONSTRUCTION FIELD SERVICES DEVELOPMENT PLANNING PLANNING &TECHNICAL SERVICES PARKS AND RECREATION DIVISION OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5:00 P.M. ON OCTOBER 12, 1990. fr REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED DATE: (O2-61° SIGNATURE OF D ECTO R AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 5/90 devrvsht DEPARTIViln\IT OF PLANNING/BUILDING/PL;JC WORKANINGDrVrsi®N ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET "I Y OF Fie QN • OCT 12 1990 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: 1Y5 DATE CIRCULATED: 9/27/90 COMMENTS D O/12/90 •' ,T ECF- 116-90 � APPLICATIONNO(S}: PP;RVMP-116-90 C/ SFp� ✓?to PROPONENT: John Krehbiel/Woodland Investments 00 Pe/e`Op /99d'i0 PROJECT TITLE: West View Addition ®��C`����/0' BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: A preliminary plat to subdivide 3.68 acres into 12 singl l' "tome lots. FS LOCATION: NE corner of SR 405 and Sunset Blvd (approx. 1800 NE 12th) SITE AREA: 3.68 BUILDING AREA (gross): N/A IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS: PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth r/ 2. Air 3. Water 4. Plants • 5. Animals 6. Energy& Natural Resources 7. Environmental Health 8. Land &Shoreline Use 9. Housing 10. Aesthetics 11. Light&Glare 12. Recreation 13. Historic&Cultural Preservation 14. Transportation 15. Public Services L—f 16. Utilities COMMENTS: We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. • J C / Signature of Director or Authorized Representa ve Date v Rev. 6/88 envrvsht REVIEW COMMENTS PRELIMINARY PLAT(NE 12TH ST. &KENNEWICK) ' JOHN KEHBIEL Oct. 10, 1990 1. NE 12th St. roadway improvements to provide: o Curb, gutters, sidewalk and Street lighting. 2) Provide street light drawing for cul-de-sac roadway. DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF-116-90 APPLICATION NO(S).: PP;RVMP-116-90 PROPONENT: John Krehbiel/Woodland Investments PROJECT TITLE: West View Addition BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: A preliminary plat to subdivide 3.68 acres into 12 single- family home lots. LOCATION: SEC: 8 TWNSHP: 23N RNG: 5E NE corner of SR 405 and Sunset Blvd (approx. 1800 NE 12th) TO: PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION SCHEDULED TAC DATE: 10/19/90 ENGINEERING SECTION TRAFFIC ENG. SECTION UTILITIES ENG. SECTION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT r., DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION CONSTRUCTION FIELD SERVICES DEVELOPMENT PLANNING PLANNING &TECHNICAL SERVICES PARKS AND RECREATION DIVISION OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5:00 P.M. ON OCTOBER 12, 1990. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: 24 NSPo2TAT/49 AL APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS / NOT APPROVED A ii d;i4 - DATE: /7747 SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTH RIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 5/90 devrvsht REVIEW COMMENTS PRELIMINARY PLAT(NE 12TH ST. &KENNEWICK) l�• 4PP?ox'�. .A-ie. LvG,Bcle‘N. JOHN KEHBIEL Oct. 10,-1990 1. NE 12th St. roadway improvements to provide: o Curb, gutters,sidewalk and Street lighting. 2) Provide street light drawing for cul-de-sac roadway. r t ` DEPARTN . T OF PLANNING/BUILDING/Ph,,,,, IC WORKS c�'y�ih� ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET 49,67) 'izrr,n�o�y RENTON FIRE DEPT. FIRE PREYEE����O BU U � 90 REVIEWING DEPARTMEN1+: jj� uen- 6-v-N /DATE CIRCULAE:97 7 90C COMMENTS DUE: 1 O 12 9O ECF- 116-90RECEIVE* APPLICATION NO(S): PP;RVMP-116-90 PROPONENT: John Krehbiel/Woodland Investments PROJECT TITLE: West View Addition BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: A preliminary plat to subdivide 3.68 acres into 12 single-family home lots. LOCATION: NE corner of SR 405 and Sunset Blvd (approx. 1800 NE 12th) SITE AREA: 3.68 BUILDING AREA (gross): N/A IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS: PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth 2. Air 3. Water 4. Plants 5. Animals • 6. Energy&Natural Resources 7. Environmental Health 8. Land &Shoreline Use 9. Housing 10. Aesthetics • 11. Light&Glare 12. Recreation 13. Historic&Cultural Preservation 14. Transportation 15. Public Services 16. Utilities COMMENTS: • v r We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. /77o Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date Rev. 6/88 envrvsht DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF-116-90 APPLICATION NO(S).: PP;RVMP-116-90 PROPONENT: John Krehbiel/Woodland Investments PROJECT TITLE: West View Addition BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: A preliminary plat to subdivide 3.68 acres into 12 single- family home lots. LOCATION: SEC: 8 TWNSHP: 23N RNG: 5E NE corner of SR 405 and Sunset Blvd (approx. 1800 NE 12th) TO: PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION SCHEDULED TAC DATE: 10/19/90 ENGINEERING SECTION TRAFFIC ENG. SECTION UTILITIES ENG. SECTION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU • POLICE DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION CONSTRUCTION FIELD SERVICES DEVELOPMENT PLANNING PLANNING &TECHNICAL SERVICES PARKS AND RECREATION DIVISION OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5:00 P.M. ON OCTOBER 12, 1990. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: fire_ IIri -u04.+uvL APPROVED PROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED Any development and/or construction shall comply with current Fire and Building Codes and Ordi- nanbes. A seeeiad means of approved access is required. Fire Department access roads/lanes shall be paved minimum width 20'; minimum height 13' 6". Yes --No Preliminary fire flow calculations show a fire flow of /, CrC,-o is required. / hydrants with a minimum flow of /, oira gpm each is required. Primary. hydrant is required to be within 30O feet of the structure. Secondary hydrants are required to be within ityA feet of the structure. `71-4�- - �, � �G� t c�a«- .4;4 6 0o f An approved automatic sprinkler system is required to protect the total structure. Yes No All fire department access roads are to be paved and installed prior to construction. Yes All fire hydrants are required to be installed and approved prior to construction. Yes No DATE: .t J/ /P9O SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 5/90 devrvsht s DEPART ; NT OF PLANNING/BUILDING/I ___ILIC WORKS c GDiv's/OF �eNroN ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET OCT 1 -II 5 1990 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: I/Ja IAII-V e��� , DATE CIRCULATED: 9/27/90 COMMENTS DUE: 10/12/90 • ECF- 116-90 Zit* APPLICATION NO(S): PP;RVMP-116-90 PROPONENT: John Krehbiel/Woodland Investments sFD / 0/ 2 PROJECT TITLE: West View Addition CO P(/�OP 199/ 'WA 8 1 4i0 RF��-. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: A preliminary plat to subdivide 3.68 acres into 12 sin© `'w+ay Fri, i,,s. S LOCATION: NE corner of SR 405 and Sunset Blvd (approx. 1800 NE 12th) ��/C'�s SITE AREA: 3.68 BUILDING AREA (gross): N/A IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS: PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth 2. Air • 3. Water \4. Plants 5. Animals 6. Energy& Natural Resources 7. Environmental Health 8. Land &Shoreline Use 9. Housing 10. Aesthetics 11. Light&Glare 12. Recreation 13. Historic &Cultural Preservation 14. Transportation 15. Public Services /� 16. Utilities v//11�15k COMMENTS: j Th,s plert w"!1 re f v i re, - r i s f o I I a fi o 0( wq'iCr ru a t n i vn0 ro ve.-n1�w'4S . an ct e.)cl�sib�,s fey- Gril o/ i-o-�r .S�-ai da.rrk Po r Det/�Pi(o D�errs J �j -vis(oh, o 1 64-7 s U p/rrl i)i .,, I r q 12 f at I s to Ce,'1-e-6( j vs'1 oil i"s tcie- o F Al v t rce 0 ro+r-a--cot & 2. See Corn rtemfrs 00 ktra died 5h e4T We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. .044. /0--- -d torn/To Signature of Director or Authorized Representative \ Date 6-')1 Rev. 6/88 ernrvsht DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF-116-90 APPLICATION NO(S).: PP;RVMP-116-90 PROPONENT: John Krehbiel/Woodland Investments PROJECT TITLE: West View Addition BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: A preliminary plat to subdivide 3.68 acres into 12 single- family home lots. LOCATION: SEC: 8 TWNSHP: 23N RNG: 5E NE corner of SR 405 and Sunset Blvd (approx. 1800 NE 12th) TO: PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION SCHEDULED TAC DATE: 10/19/90 ENGINEERING SECTION TRAFFIC ENG. SECTION UTILITIES ENG. SECTION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION CONSTRUCTION FIELD SERVICES DEVELOPMENT PLANNING PLANNING &TECHNICAL SERVICES PARKS AND RECREATION DIVISION OTHERS: r . COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5:00 P.M. ON OCTOBER 12, 1990. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: VdC1. Ver APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS >3 NOT APPROVED X SeParAi-e Vva-fewVie{ n j n)frevevvtew�S 9/id e)c4Sto hs ireio w 'r�, 19IAos SIi I Coa o,vi ']-o Ci)y o 411'fvq Slamda✓'ds A� DevefoPe'r 0 +1lifr�S, n w✓c, }n rM6,ty) IP1 rovevv Its' grc r€ urr4ot' j)c not firn;f-e4 0w11 : �IGisfa1Iaf'tDill 'o.F $ :hc/h Iva oh nay In5f-allaf'o% op Fye. I40v-4Kt as shovvi oh jOrellvh 647 rIa+ e)ci nd Doesh'� .I.1/A+er Sdrv;ce,s as rec��v , 5,7�J C(/� fo 4 I I Gl jp�p l'CQ th le 57 'U'GV-6'0�1 G►�itW�fees/ 4 J 'rh(� 1 - . �� DATE: /0/12 /0 SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 5/90 devrvsht FEE APPLICATION: 4 DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW S'_ J u ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SriLci CI PLAN REVIEW ROUTING SLIP 0 OTHER /O / / ' DATE• � ,D APPLICANT: �N�'�� JOB ADDRESS: , f. C,I fi {/S p Y.-„� , /rod 1,7 /21 NATURE OF WORK: `f' `�G�a�" n �% PROPERTY MANAGEME T /049...9O DATE RECEIVED Comments ue BY PROPERTY MGMT. Comments or suggestions regarding this application should be provided in writing. Please provide comments to the Comm.Dev.Dept.(C.D.D.)by 5:00 p.m.on above date. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION c71/4eA,,ti hdO-Ltettsoi.ed ---. fES APPLIED CANNOT APPLY ES ❑ EGAL DESCRIPTION ❑NEED MORE INFORMATION ❑ SQUARE FOOTAGE D FRONT FOOTAGE ❑ VICINITY MAP It is the intent of this development fee analysis to put the developer/owner on notice,that the fees quoted below will apply to the subject site upon development of the property. All quoted fees are due and payable at the time the construction permit is issued to install the on-site and off-site improvements(i.e.underground utilities,street improvements,etc.) PROJECT COST LATECOMER LATECOMER AGREEMENT-WATER NO. PER. FTG. FEE CITY HELD ..--p— PRIVATE DEVELOPER HELD .- 0- LATECOMERS AGREEMENT-SEWER CITY HELD -••©- PRIVATE DEVELOPER HELD .r 0 - SPECIAL UTILITY CONNECTION CHARGE-WATER UNITS SUCC FEE Single family residential dwelling unit$940/lot x . c m`l a .8o �a . Apartment,Condo,each multiplex unit$545/ea.unit x Commercial/Industrial$.126/sq.ft.of property x (not less than $940.00) SPECIAL UTILITY CONNECTION CHARGE-SEWER Single family residential dwelling unit$470/lot x / b DO i • - Apartment, Condo,each multiplex unit$270/ea.unit x Commercial/Industrial$.063/sq.ft.of property x (not less than $470.00) SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT(Hospital Area)WATER UNITS SAD FEE Developments with 1500 •M Fire. lows or Less: Area Charge$0.034 ,er .ft.x Frontage Charge$16.i I per front ft.x Developments with Greater th• 500 GPM Fire Flows: Area Charge$0.04: .er q.ft.x Frontage Charge ,, 8.00 p r front ft.x •-. 0 -- SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT(Honey Crk,Intercptr)-SEWER UNITS SAD FEE Area Charges: Residential d elling uni ,apartments or equivalen ; $25 per dwelling unit x Commercial dev op ent: $.05 per sq.ft.of oss site area x Front Footage Charges: $37.19 per Fr t Ft. n ea.side)x $74.38 per .Ft. (prpt on both sides of imprv.)x —. h0 `"• TOTAL: $ /60 goLD. eel The above quoted fees do NOT include inspection fees,side sewer permits,r/w permit fees or the cost of water meters. . ctaLvt.t. )14 . .., ,A.- /�� O f� Signature of Director or Authorized Representative DATE 90 ww/forms/fxapp/b qp q,0 ' CITIOOF RENTON 141 � " Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Earl Clymer, Mayor Lynn Guttmann, Administrator September 27, 1990 John Krehbiel c/o Woodland Investments PO Box 2257 Woodinville, WA 98072 SUBJECT: West View Addition ECF;PP;RVMP-116-90 Dear Mr. Krehbiel: The Development Planning Section of the City of Renton has formally accepted the above-referenced application for preliminary review. It is tentatively scheduled for consideration by the Technical Advisory Committee on October 19, 1990. Following that review, you will be notified that: 1) your application is complete and has been scheduled for environmental review and determination, or 2) that additional information is required to continue processing your application for environmental review. Please contact me, at 235-2550, if you have any questions. Sincerely, Mark Pywell Project Manager cc: Patty Akens Nelson &Wm. F.Akens, Jr. 1800 Mill Creek Rd, #1A Mill Creek, WA 98012 Lilly K. Backman • c/o Maverick-Realty ATTN: Mary Gustine 212 Wells Ave S Renton, WA 98055 accptltr/MP/kac 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2631 t5i"' " i • � C F:' .... .:..:...:.::: :::.::..::.:.:. :::.... :: :> :>::::�::::':r: ::::: ::. `• ::::: :.CO ...M rNI . .D VEL .P E . ..DEPAR . .... AG EiYT:. A'AY SCgTER % 6A0 6/Ciii/IN Of/9 c:• 48G-/ZS'z . P.O. .BOX 386 WooD/Nv/CCE, w.4 «OWNER < :':`< •.:;>:. >: : ;:<: • TYPE'O:F APPLICATION:& .FEES: • NAME:et ii y AiceKS ' C,I1 1 LC- 'a ck tt&w *REZONE $ ti) Isom w°itn SPECIAL PERMIT _ F. d•�-1=4 ng . a►z. • i $ _TEMPORARY PERMIT . $ ADD c,?P -1- 1A C/o (Maven�c►c 12eq Icy I Da �[1 ►`7-nikta waft./ Oa5.`(..42 e _'CONDTIIONAL USE PERMIT $ Sflb PLAN APPROVAL $ 2•i 2 I•vg j. i ve S. • •—SPECIAL PERMIT $ CITY: ln) ) p e I� I ZIP: ,n/� —GRADE&FILL PERMIT $ , IN A- �tl O 12 e M GNP Li/►T Cl(gO (NO.CU.YDS: ) • TELEPHONE NUMBER: Z�IJ 2 - c-(t-it-I I-I —`VARIANCE $ • 3 3�, 32�� (FROM SECTION: ) i ..IS- ZZ —'W IVER $ :•: . ;...;.:.; .;.;.-51?:: .:::..;.c.:::':• ,::;:•:::>:: •:':•;:';:•s:•>:•>:••.::>::•::•:::::::• OUTINE VEGETATION / CONTACT PERSON :::AP:PLI:GANT> .0° MANAGEMENT PERMIT j $ � D • NAME: To NN f-R 6//B/EL ('JUSTIFICATION REQUIRED) `/a cv0004/9,/D i/VV6-SrMENTs ., ADDRESS: SUBDIVISION: $ AO. .DOX EZS7 _.LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT $ CITY: ZIP: _SHORT PLAT $ r.0 OOD/NI//L L E , aJA 9BO 7 Z _ ATIVE PLAT $ PRELIMINARY PLAT $ 740.CD FINAL PLAT $ TELEPHONE NUMBER: _ ,! r `}�,�`Z/O Z NO.OF LOTS: GtJ I/N� SI�d(T70a PLAT NAME: 117.....0 :PROJE•. •C•T:INFORNIATI:O:N`> PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAME; PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: $ WEsr V/EW /7o.Dirio/t/ _PRELIMINARY • FINAL. I'ROI'ERTY/PROJECT ADDRESS(S)/LOCATION: 4oRX. /ROO NE /Z'r// • X E/Nra m 1 WLl ?r•Q,5 r —BINDING SI1 E PLAN: . $ IjING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER(S): I Li tsi-4 31 I q40— 'Vl'G/-o 'MOBILE HOME PARKS: $ 9 6'o cG C-6-op O s-D Lf _TENTATIVE EXISTING LAND USE(S); _PRELIMINARY VA-C 4NT FINAL PARK NAME: NO.OF SPACES: EXISTING ZONING: . • 7000 SF !� ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW $ CO - .17a. PROPOSED LAND USE(S): PROJECT VALUE: $ 50 000 SINGLE FAW1�L / / El/DF/S/7r"/� C SENSITIVE AREA: L �y(� • APA: _1 _2 _O ER SEWER MORATORIUM AREA:_YES NO PROPOSED ZONING: 7ZO0 SF • TOTAL FEES: • $ SITE AREA(SQ.FT.OR ACREAGE): DATE PAID: 1• G 8 AL2ES POSTAGE PROVIDED: • YES _NO • pL NNiF+Iai IDIVISioN . . .. . ... .. s sectionsto be:completed by Cityst i.... ::.::::' . ':•::. :•:::.::'>:: :•:'::>:':,:,:':•::::•>::::':::::::•.':: , SE P 1 7 199 0 0 • i Ct Fi 1 be ::::.S•...•. ,::.�HPL CU .;..LLA.: •:.P• :.;:$E.>::::::M:•:•:i.:.•:: .>..• : : >:;;•:•;::';>::•:•;:•::::-:::::: :•..,.:.. ... V-A�AT�.;:;;:yV::;:::;PUD.; i:FPL:TD:�:;::SN1»::�S1�IE::'s:::P H .....F . . .;�::•: .::»:::•:•»ss::<;•>::»;:;>:;: :<;::::;'::;:;::::�>: ::;':, ' • ::: ...:. :. ::::::..::::::.:.. ..:.::: ... . . ....:>:LEGAL:DESC.RIPTION. OF.:PROPERT:Y::.. ;•;;:..if:more:S ace.i . ' ui .e . . ei tt ch: . .. ... ....... . .. ..... ..... .... ..... .... ..... . .. .a . ...5.x� ...x..d. ��a�. � se te: beet�;::>;::> . . . :..:......:...::.:.:..:...::...:....::..:........................:::::::::::::.: ;�?�:::.:. :..:�:.�q.:::.::.�.�...::.:•.;:•�:.:•;:. .:<. par.�>;:.:$;:�:..:�::..)::.;:<.;::.:;..:: :.. . i DESCRIPTIONS Lrcei 1: Parcel. 2: That portion of the following described Tract 27 Harries Garden Home Tracts North Property lying NortherlyRenton according to plat recorded in Volume 34 of the interchange, SR 405, as condemned in King of Plats, page 38, in King County, County Superior Court Cause No.' 656773: Washington; EXCEPT that portion of the that portion of the Northwest quarter of the North' 100 feet of said tract lying West of Northeast quarter of Section 8, Township .23 the East 27 feet thereof. . North, Range 5 East,' W.M. , in King County, ---- • Washington, described as follows: Beginning at the North quarter corner of ' said' Section 8; thence N 89-22-50 E " ' along the' North line of. said section, ' ' ' ' 767.64 feet to THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING of the tract herein described; thence . S 0-35-45 E 623.47 feet; thence S 46-35-27 W 410,.41 feet' to the Easterly margin of the . - 'uget Sound Power & Light Company's right-, • . • Qf-way; thence S 15-07-50 E along the ' ' ' . Easterly margin of the Puget Sound Power& . Light: Company's right-of-way, 227.10 feet; • thence N 46-35-27 ;E 605;33 feet,. thence ' ' ii 0-35-45 W 710.91 feet to the North line of said Section,8; thence S 89-22-50 W ' ' . 4lon,$ the North line Of said section, 200 - . ' feet to THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING: (also . • known as a portion of New Renton Home. Sites; . now vacated, as recorded in Volume 17 of - - Plats,' page 6, in 'King County, 'Washington) . . I, VQ h h 14. k" �i°ehb/" , being duly:sworn, declare that I am (please check •one)'• / the authorized representative to act for,the•property owner,_ the owner of'the property involved in this application and that'the foregoing - statements and answers herein contained and the infyjp rewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the bet of my knowledge and belief. ' a��a® �1, C.��1i//� G0 �G �Sg1ON F.jAs'�a q SU SCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ;rHI 7 __ a * a �,� •�fr� ,pj,:,O 9,9 FOp WAS00,0110 NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR THE STATE OF ' WASHINGTON, RESIDING AT: . /J / •(N me of Notary Public) ' (Siature owner) t L.�ewie _7D'1 S � /e Gv P,o, �oKzzs7 • (Address) ' (Address) . • i "ltAV I )e (A/ c?8 0 7 Z. (Cifiy/State/Zip) • • . ' (City/State/Zip) . / /476 3ST-5330 485- -24.0Z. . (Telephone) . (Telephone) • ' A,ceptance of this application and required filing fee does-not constitute a complete application. 'Plans and other material required to constitute a complete application'are'listed in the"Application Procedure." . R tnMactr 7/':' . 1 PROJECT NARRATIVE The proposed plat of "West View Addition" will add twelve new single family home building sites to the City of Renton for middle income families. It is located roughly in the Northeast corner of the intersection of SR 405 and Sunset Boulevard (North Renton Interchange) providing convenient accessibility to the City Center and SR 405. The property contains 3.68 acres of which 0.50 acres are in roads; 0.17 acres are in a shared park area; 0.62 acres are to be dedicated to the City for greenbelt and drainage purposes; and the remaining 2.37 acres are distributed among the twelve lots with a minimum size of 7479 square feet and a maximum size of 11106.5 square feet. Lots 9 through 12 will provide an additional greenbelt area of about 11,000 square feet. The desirable location and the large amount of natural areas in this plat should enhance the surrounding neighborhoods. 0 PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF RENTON SEP `9 7 1990 4 E�V.D PLANNINGDIVISION CrrY OF RENTON 0 F R4, SEP 7 1990 0 city of Renton Li "k=•-. ei 0 z -i- 0 g ROUTINE VEGETATION MANAGEMENT 0 • PERMIT APPLICATION 40,9 ireo sEplegs • • , .0,9rrY A/e4sOAl z/z A. CA-,72.94/ • PROPERTY OWNER a p UM P RA-EWs i 56 "411/6X/Cfr A'exzry /OoD rivzZ. cREE/e 04717-4/: "s7RY Gusrr,ve• MAILING ADDRESS /47/4z aece'. , 4h4 980/Z e/e atec Ave. 5. 3.38- 3 Z99 7 74-,1-6 ez- APEA/reA/ 4c44' 9,9 oszr TELEPHONE NO. : ese- 4444- CONTACT PERSON (IF OTHER THAN PROPERTY OWNER) : : JONA, orRENVEL • ing/hp G/ZiAMW OSSOCOX40/7*,-, MAILING ADDRESS: WOOD44APA /Wé5TfrF(V7Yj Ao. Box 386 P.O. SOX 2.2$-7 w000/NV/LCEri 98072 TELEPHONE NO. : woophvvacel 9807Z 1-86- /2.52 4494-- Z/02. Au SITE ADDRESS (PROPERTY LOCATION) : 'WOO dt,/e Aurivroyt/ SIZE OF SITE/PROPERTY 40300 .rie. a. 68 AC. IS THE SITE UNDEVELOPED , PARTIALLY DEVELOPED X , OR DEVELOPED DESCRIPTION OF SPECIFIC WORK TO BE ACCOMPLISHED: c'ext&is .,c4( AroViD )V 'Mole Co4mceicr/a/1/ IS THE' WORK TO BE PERFORMED FOR THE SAKE OF PREPARING THE SITE FOR FUTURE DEVELOPMENT? ‘ Yes . CITY LAND USE. DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. : IS THE WORK TO BE PERFORMED. WITHIN 25 FEET OF THE HIGH WATER MARK OF,A STREAM, CREEK, LAKE, SHORELINE OR WETLAND? A/0 IS THE WORK TO BE PERFORMED WITHIN 25 FEET OF THE HIGH WATER MARK OF A STREAM, CREEK OR WETLAND? /VO IS THE WORK TO BE, PERFORMED IN AN AREA WHERE SLOPES EXCEED 40% OR WHERE SLOPES EXCEED 25% WITH A CLASS II OR CLASS III LANDSLIDE OR EROSION„HAPARP AS DENTIFIED ON CITY OR COUNTY RECORDS? 44 ' • IS THE WORK TO BE PREFORMED WITHIN A "NATIVE GROWTH • PROTECTION EASEMENT? No TIME SCHEDULE FOR TREE 'CUTTING/VEGETATION MANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES: START DATE: END DATE: Wog APAYWmA4t OF Ace anif mm1 Y ‘k (6C ,v44r• TYPE OF MECHANICAL EQUIPINIENT: TO BE USED; IF ANY: fi"eiuf efu/?. Svc/ 4.5 ddLer 0 ra.Cf4r L14CCt0 DESCRIPTION. OF WORK TO, BE ACCOMPLISHED WITH ME/CHANICAL EQUIPMENT: C/canna, q,rtc/ each ler read chid /Z- At'o.aeS DESCRIBE PROPOSED MEASURES TO BE USED TO PROTECT THE SITE AND ADJACENT PROPERTIES FROM POTENTIAL ADVERSE IMPACTS. OF THE d.PROPOSED WORK, AND EQUIPMENT OPERATION: ��" 6e /Iev ormed : wi Ihm t4 9ree.4 e/i e��QE' sAvve 4Rens p au/i/c4 cv ' provi g . .a A U -I er ara ' i 9a° 0 et- fiea_ eri efer iii e '�orej&cf. . III - .. _... ..� .. ; ,• The following additional information/materials .must also be attached to this application form: (Note--incomplete permit applications cannot be processed) . ATTACHMENT #1. A plan for the specific work to be ' performed, including: the-,locatiomof>All areas proposed to SEE be .cleared and the types and sizes of vegetation/trees to 'be TREE removed or altered, future building sites (if any) , right- of-w' ays, utility lines, and easements. . (Note: Clearing should not occur outside of these areas or more than 15 feet from a proposed building foundation . line) . If a dripline of a tree will overhang/overlap az,.cgnstruction line, this must also be indicated on the ;plan. :- - 'The plan must be drawn to scale with northern property line at the top of the paper and clearly show all property boundaries and adjacent streets. ATTACHMENT #2. Standards and _criteria to be used for 4 routine tree trimming and topping; • ': ye ATTACHMENT #3 . ' Standards and criteria to be used for ground cover management,; 1 •i v ATTACHMENT #4. Standards and criteria to be used in determining the location:'for? use of any chemicals, , pesticides, or herbicides;-:`}-°_— ATTACHMENT #2 This project will clear and remove 16 significant trees and/ or clumps during a construction period only and will not require routine tree trimming and topping. ATTACHMENT ##3 Ground cover may be removed in areas shown on tree and utility map that is not within the "Tree Save Areas". This work will probably be done with heavy equipment such as a dozer and grader.. ATTACHMENT # 4 No chemicals, pesticides or herbicides will be used in the clearing and removal of trees and brush. • i y :E:.N.TON > > > ; >< >> > < ] > < > : ;::.:;.;::::<.: :.; .::::.;;. . . .; .:.: . ig:.>;>:. .;;.;iaC I T:: >::.:' F .R.. . .. . .. ......... . . .............. ..::::::::::...::..:::... ....KLIST: : '< ` :':>::.:::>::::>::::::::::::::>::::>::::::::::>::::::::::>::::>:::::::::::::::>::::::<::::::ENVIRONMENTAL..0 .. .. . Purpose of Checklist: The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), Chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probably significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide. whether an EIS is required. . Instructions for Applicants: This environmental checklist ask you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies, ,use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS,. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise i,afofmatidn known, or give the best description you can. You must answer-each question accurately and carefully; to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question ' does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply". Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark • designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that,will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably . related to determining if there may be significant adverse impacts. Use of Checklist for Nonproject Proposals: (Please Type or Print Legibly) Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply". IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D). For nonproject actions (actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs), the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: GUEST VIEW 4DD/ T70/t/ . (A- A-02f1419 C /«7`) 2. Name of applicant: • ToI�v? A- secthAc / /,4 JE /is-- Z/oZ C/O Wooc//and.Z-14 c/eJ'fk'eif j AO. Box Z Z S7 %"voo' vi ie 1 w,4 ?(PO7 Z. 3. Address and ppho a number of applicant and contact person: "eh`D.i/E., ¢g'G-/2 j- • x ySGATTE � c/o /LlE6At1 Gprepa d F4s7'6C, /D. lox _7d'G wood/t.{w14 , 4.14- ?So7Z 4: Date checklist prepared: /vi,2C f( z 2 /? c, . 5. Agency requesting checklist: PLANNING DIVISION ,�e1�11 CIfYOFRENFON C/TV of SEP 1'7 1990 RECEIVE) � I -2- 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): / rojecf- fa 6e9P7 . of 5cs aS /oa.SSale 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansions, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. A4 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. A/o v._ • 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. No• 10. List any governmental approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known/ /� Bv//i y �e�'rv�/7S -For Ye51 1.th11 -! `oivieS 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. /f 1-oiMa./ fD/a f o 3. 7 o-crcS /Y! 1-4c e/f7 o� /QcN l'O %For 'el r de t-t-1M/ J ,u r i O . 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topography map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. A16 giA44 sr. is, f-% c c /TY Cf x«710si , A ii, Coves i gov /zt� //J�s1 ILyth . B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS • 1. Earth ' . a. 'General description of the site (circle one); flat, rolling, hilly, steep, slopes, 1 mountainous, other EA___Z4 ro///Gt7 /-D,J w/f4 s cc' s-ivee ON Gamest S'/01e. b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope?) 38 a (oii $icy s/6pc area C. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, scaly, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. 9rairti(? /04w, d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. f • -3- e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of ill. G'r'acll� for l^Cc..1 roar. OUavnt/f/e.3 14- cut or `(`r arov/c( he 5044((. f. Could erosion occur as a result , of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. A/0 g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? Abo -f— Zc9 0 h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: , /ov►t y(ecesSu.vy . 2. AIR / a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe��" and give approximate quantities, if known. cohsfrvetro+' : E g,u.st -fro Aeuify etu/priei'lf ai4cf Arorker'S au?oS. reorsn,10/t�cd /Rico ect: �XG&Lis/f✓o0A 110 e ou�iAcv� etufos r s`uo/(e -�vaw( -dive /aeef v F Gta eJ b. Are there any off-site sources of emission? 6/AA rJJ/a•4I 14.6•14 h e/y4 6ori iy troye of c. Proposed measures to reduce or con.trol emissions or other impacts to air, if any: /✓ovle heed — cod(sfruc 0M1 ew/UJ/oh1 +row► f4is svt4A/,/ ee a projecf (poute J,epf4feiOr 3. WATER a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. /V0 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would/ be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. /y/4 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities,if known. 11/M 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. 1/VO. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? I�f/so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. /V/4 -4- b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No• • 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, ,the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. /07 c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters, If so, describe. )AT Eit ONOP, W/LL 74 ,4 EG V c i rE) B V A_ O ES I(.,,JE/) STM M SYSTEGv! • 2) Couuld waste material enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. /V0 • d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: / /VO! c 4/e.ectc 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: — -- —�� X ...i deciduous tree: 0Pr-aple .spen, other c or�`ax w / 0� evergreen tree:. cedar, pine, other shrubs grass crop or grain wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants: water lily, eel grass, milfoil, other other types of vegetation b. What kind and/ amoupt of vegetation will be removedor altered? Trees a.KI Ul�Cler1,nil -F-0 )eoa.Cl tnra, P✓yvec✓ayI a 14 c/ Ruse_ 'onJuf/owt• c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. �yC , d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measure to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: , SOvue exl5../4iky 71-VCC.S Ara, h. v'efa/ t,4e.vt /0ssVd/-e Ili /vr 9 reel') t avid co&IA mum/ parAZ, 5. ; Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: Birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other ,r4 Mammals: 'deer, ,bear, elk, beaver, other o� ,, /l ' Fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other ' / 4 j . -5- b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. /V/A c. Is ''t fhe site part of a migration route? If so, explain /Vo d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: N/A 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, wood, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. / //eMei will pto4bo,d"/y 4e c/ec/r/ckj(> Mca/ed 0014 o. VcP/cc y hC-A b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. / /✓�. — %w 4 o wi es all// 4 e 749 o Z-o�, a IA Av- f ro Gil Ac/'j c e ti-f ho el cif a SKaIC •'f , c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: ivoHe — o7L4ret fhc41 `i Orwta1 /1'lfv/6011,5,1 //mil G/aw►cI . 7. Environmental Health a. Are there, any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill; or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. Ao . 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. //A- 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: 11//" b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the areas which may affect your project (for example: traffic,/equipment, operation, other)? A/o vl o 7�i e r e i //j vl" fr ckze/c , 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a Iong-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what lours noise would come from the site. Sitorf er141 = ComrfYocf/eN — cavy e vipteriKf �' �v/74.14 c%r 4'/6y . LO 4) ? CV' — XeS;demf/a/ w+i/7 if6kier, 3) Pro osed measure t¢ reduce or control noise impacts, if any: / ►.�-e ti e ccf' d 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. . What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. /Vo . • -6- _ c. De cri-be any structures on the site. o Sfrucfvr&J . d. Willll any structures be demolished? If so, what? /77/� e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? ( 72D0 ) f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? 7 w+r y ✓eftcrebtt/al g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? N// h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. A/o. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? • /2- tiew 14.4 j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? • k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: •'Ilk iC` Ceccc� ,. 9., Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether . high, middle, or low- ncome housing. , Ul e( tividt /flCom-. /tovf,hy • b. Approximately how -many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. Niit4- c. Proposed measures o reduce or controI housing impacts, if any: e. 10. Aesthetics . I: a. What is the tallest height, of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building materials) proposed. Z S ory {zowte' 0,/7-4 ufoocl exf-crv(oc . . I b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? go we. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: Yi C. cq 11. Light and Glare 1-7- , • , a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would I , it mainly occur? Om e_ b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? , c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? /i/ovt-e d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: /1/014 e_ tag c_ , 12. Recreation a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? A7014 b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, descr* e. I" A (9 c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including • recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: /1414-e A4-181.cl 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. /1%.14 b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. A/044 c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: 4/4 -8- • • • ; 14. Transportation . a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed • • , access to the existing street system. ,Show on site plans, if any. A/E zo'tt 5Y • • b. : Is site currently served i by public transit? If not, what is the approximate • i,S distance to the nearest transit stop? ; b(a H f A-0OLk) • • • • c. ` ' How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would '': the project eliminate? I , / • j •, . O t'— Thcvi $f eef /q r k I kt9 h o !f' d /i e r e vki t-v/ • q'�: � � C�.Gafc( D/' �ycJfroytl d. , Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing ` ' roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate !. whether public or private? , , e.• , ;. Will the project use (or occur in the'immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air . ; ;• transportation? If so; generally describe. is • do'iY `NoNl . • I f. , How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? • If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. I. Ahou-F f8 ( /g 14ew ref/c/�emcej IX 4' Ter Ycsic/Q4ce) pe' eic g. . Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: . /�N L , .• ,, 15. Public Services ' a. Would the project result in' an increased need for public services (for example: • • • fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally ' describe. Tail ,ro)cct sAtou/r/piY create A. durd'eil Dh cx/t79h9 public servict f. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. • 16. Utilities ' i • a. Circle utilities cur ently liable the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service telephon sanitary sewe , septic s tem,-o er. . b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate '' ,; vicinity which might be needed. • ,. E/e of-rici75 — yo,9e7' tower • GU A f c•r — Ci 75 o-P- ! e rat-c'l �e�74... - '�j r��%e{rat '1 . 7-6kt/tor/+/- — e' �' • -9- C. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack,of full disclosure on my part. Proponent: ; V YIPS Wac (0- . ;1.,44,0 `ov Name Printed: (76 t,--M (-H3 t �� -10- _ •D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (This sheet should only be used for actions involving decisions on policies„plans and programs. Do not use this sheet, for project actions.) Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal,were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms. . 1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air;. production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? 4rnrEA ,ewVOFF a,/LL ,er co,/T/eacceI 7-#20uGH STO,ut i J f/oit/- ONLY ppD/T/Oic/.�}C EA47sf/0/10- 7o n/L uJouco jE e-xt-of f/Z.owl f9uros e, . f oirieDGvit/E/ZJ• A/0 141 ti9200CJ rug Nces tu/CL rye At ofl oCED a2 _Smite CA! 5/7" Pro osed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: I N� . 2. , How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life? SO/W LEIF� g E C /Ft)C fo /2O&D ,9.y/J ��ES. Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life, are: • et; °, -of 7//E . '/TE a//CC AC1141f/oU /A/ ft- A/Arc) F L sri 7 e Ty,Cd uGft G2CEA)AfeCT.1 nA'2 COI4m f/N//747 �,4,fk• 3. How. would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? EL G`C T2/c 17 f/' USED /4/ ,416144 S Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? T///J "AaT C-T w/OC ' //or i/ pe-Cr 14VJY $eNS/T/vE— 6�KE641�, Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: 6AUE kre'DE, 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? ///h • • -11- Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: Au/A' 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? / . //OM ET cultic f/ /beg c toc$ rEp CO3L E 773 C/ty O, - 146-wro AND /3o E/N G S#o c M/T' S/6/0F/ci9AJTL`f 7/ Tf/c /'/to/1c ams. Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. Tf#E 6'ieoPO DOES A/o T Go/VFc/c w/Ti l /ieOTEC T/1,A1 c F 7W EA/V/IZah144Eiv T. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentat.on or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Proponent: tamc( `C ,c.!�s't Cord Name Printed: M Ffs Pt��l ��- f sr - U/5J • DD�rro�, Pi'::.:::::.::..:::::::::::::.:::::..:::: <» ::DES:>:.:<,::T:::::;;.>:;.:.; ::::: : :.:»;:.: . :.,. .`.'` ::...... ... . .AR• ...MENT...QF. .. .O7Nm .::DE(fELC7.PMEN.T.::.:..:.::::.::..:.:.:•:::::.::..::.:...:..... .. . ... ...... .......... ..... • ***FOR OFFICIAL USE1 ONLY*** P �� 1,�1e s �l+el.) 4 cny,nz�vrsN nr PROJECT TITLE:. Qy� • �o • SEP ' 7 • APPLICANT: 1990 • APPLICATION NUMBER: PP., 11(0— 90 �� The following is a .list of property owners within 300 feet of the subject site. : The Community 'Development Department will notify these individuals of the proposed development. , NAME ADDRESS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER Sic Ar 7r,4 c7 ,A1G ES ./ �ti�U �— • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •• ��. "' • . . Cti< o:e '4' • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • I • • • • • • •t , • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • i• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Certification ; • I, o1-fri 1-4- I��rr�c�f��, ,• • hereby certify that the above list(s) .of adjacent propertybylaw owners and,their addresses were taken from the records of the King County Assessor as prescribed . ) ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a Notary • • • Public, in and for the State of Washington residing at yes®s on the • . /�j' day , of s LC gaa��`�•o..o 0 Q.•.,,SSA • s4ti C- ,� � • • Signed: /� 0 • /cZt(C\oTA y�N;• e • a .9 _•A ,- .,1,.. ,, .>: >:.: ;<�::.,..'.,::':`. >i ::..:. *:***** ,-...:,:,se:;. •'':::::::kSlrikilrr:x. :: 1Q•;•....... .: .• ' ;For Office Use Only F t WAS'',r.. c os%e!! :.' s::;:r :CERTIFIGATiON;FOR:MAILING':: :'. .k:: : :.:j ..:- 5::3'>.... '.::,: j.i':`:.• i;li';i;::::;;::'t::::::.; iGi i2 i:; ?t5 . [•i.ico§......p!.> :•• :• :;•''': :::; , hereby cieru that notices`of':the- public meetingon,'trie ;;.sub1ect.;:...t..:: Ids`,.::•:.;:.: were mailed:Ar1:::>::>:::: : : ::': _:>: ;:: to..each .listed :ad acent ro ert owner '� e��e p...;.Y>..:..':....::::as::pr.:$::r1..ed::.�. :aaw;:» : :: :'>; 'r.L.,:.::.::rrs ::::::.::>: :>:,::;::::;.:::::,::..>:::: ;:: <..; •. ATTEST;;::Subscri.bed:and:s,worn.to befg :> : �•� me a Nota Public in a for the State..dkf::;: cS ''>..:: :,`;:`'.: ::..: :::.. •::;Wahin' tc n residin::.at: �_ .' ..... . ;:. .. ..:.;:.::,..::.••••. .. ..: -. on':t.::e:<:><:' ':: :::::da)/..........-...... f::.> :41. 1,et: :><:•>•::>:..::> >: ::.. : -..;.. :.. ;. '•.Fe':• �` :i ned::" f� . Ca?.-jedl . ...I ms • • Rev 5/90 , . • CERTIFIC.doc " • - Pat Depasquale .1152 Aberdeen Ave. N.E.. U0823 os 9090-02 Renton, WA 98055. Pat Desquale 1152 Aberdeen Ave. N.E.—a0823_05 _9092-00 Renton, 'WA 98055 Elmer A. "Snowberger P.O. Box 341 U082305__ 9095-07 Renton, WA 98057 Freda L. Swaisgood 2135 N.E. 12th St. ___6/0..623062_ 9105-05 Renton, WA 98056 , James P. McElroy 1160 Aberdeen Ave. N.E. U082.30s__9117-01 Renton, WA, 98056 Pat Depasquale 1152 Aberdeen Ave.N.E. _U_0.8.23"a3 __912204 Renton, WA 98055 Elmer A: Snowberger P.O. Box 341 4408 23 OS_ 9123-03 Renton, WA 98057 Phyllis E. Swartfager 2131 N.E. . 12th __- l/0823OS__ 9126-00 Renton, WA 98055 .Ann C. Dickinson 1156 Aberdeen Ave. N.E.__ O0.92305 9155-04 Rentonm WA 98055 • Cory W. Cappelletti 1158 Aberdeen Ave: N.E. ___U0823059202-07 Renton, WA 98056 William & Eileen •Glockner 2103 N.E. 12th St, 4/082305. 9207-02 Renton, WA 98056 Susan Shirl White . 2110 N.E. 12th 3_5439_0 ___1719-01 Renton, WA 98056 • . Gordon L. Roberts, ETUS 10423 Forest Ave. S Seattle, WA 98178 Mark A. Nolte 2108 N.E. 12th 33439_O _1721-07 Renton, WA 98056 James K. Lee 1224 Aberdeen Ave. N.E. 3343.901726-02 Renton, WA 98056 Kennydale United Methodist 3005 Park North _33¢390 1759-02 Renton, WA 98056 David Olson 15807 S.E. 116th _33_413__90_ _1760-09 Renton, WA 98056 Raymond M. Wells 1301 Aberdeen Ave. N.E.___,, 3_43.90__ 1761-08 Renton, WA 98055 Marvin H. Schroeder • 1333 Aberdeen N.E. . 33�F3 90 _ 1762-07 ' Renton, WA 98055 ' 9— Lillian Gladys Hofmann 1309 Aberdeen Ave. 1763-06 Renton, WA 98056 Mark F. Kirchner 2010 N.E. 12th ,U4.390 1764-05 Renton, WA 98056 Alfred C. Erdt 1409 Aberdeen Ave. N.E. 33_4.3.90 1765-04 Renton, WA 98056 George P. Rutt 1325 Aberdeen Ave. N.E. 334-.3 9O 1766-03 Renton, WA 98055 Paul B & Pamela F Sedlak 2018 N.E. 12th St. _ 33-4-3 o 1767-02 Renton, WA 98056 George C. & Phyllis A. Nelson 2008 N.E. 12th St._ _____ 3.3.435'0 _ 2520-08 Renton, WA 98056 Gene T. Galyean 18458 8th Ave. S 334.390 _ 2559-02 Seattle, WA 98148 Ralph B. Bergman 1908 N.E. 12th St. _334390 2560-09 Renton, WA 98056 Lauree Galyean 1208 Lincoln Pl. N.E. _334390 ___2561=08 Renton, 'WA 98056 Paul Kaimakis 1825 N.E. 14th St. 3343_90^_ 2562-07 1325 M.S. .e/4 h 3c. Renton; WA 98055 Laery L. & Susan J. Babb 1316 Lincoln Pl. N.E. —3.343.9C_2563=06 Renton, WA 98056 LarryLL. & Dana Jo Babb 1316 Lincoln P1. N.E. .3.34.-00___2564-05 Renton, WA 98056 Marvin L & Dolores M. Eschbach 1901 N.E. 14th J3g390 2565-04 Renton, WA 98056 Verner F. Meek 1909 N.E. 14th St. _ 33 439QJ 2566-03 Renton, WA 98055 Harris E. Watson 1319 Kennewick Av. N.E. .3343_9.0_ _3358-03 Renton, WA 98055 Henderson Sloane West 1215 Lincoln Place N.E.__ _3 _43.3_.0_3359-02 Renton, WA 98055 John G. Dechaineau 1325 Kennewick Ave. N.E. _33_43 9O 3360-09 Renton, WA 98055 Fern Dean 1313 Kennewick Ave. N.E._ _ 334 3.90 3361-08 Renton, WA 98056 James H. Sloane 26219 S.E. 31st St. 334.3.90 _3362-07 Issaquah, WA 98027 3 Estate of Fred Akers c/o Patty Akers Nelson 3017 92nd Ave. N.E. _4_0 "6:57_0_ 0005-04 Bellevue, WA 98004 Puget Sound Power & Light Co. P. .0. Box 868 _ 6(4;6'67O 0010-07 Bellevue, WA 98009 E. G. Wolhuter 1127 Aberdeen Ave. N.E. ____3//9 90 _0130-06 Renton, WA 98056 Henry Lingat 2225 Dayton Ave. AY ._ __ _ 3//990 0131-05 Renton, WA 98055 Ray Brown 1533 Aberdeen Ave. N.E. 3//9 90 0132-04 Renton, WA 98056 H. F. Loban 1151 Aberdeen Ave. N. E. _ _3//990_0140.04 Renton, WA 98056 L. & Karen Wirkman 1155 Aberdeen Ave. N.E.__ 3/L 9 9O_0145-09 Renton, WA 98056 Douglas Allen 1161 Aberdeen Ave. N.E.____3/_/_9_90 0146-08 Renton, WA 98055 Chlorine Monnett 1165 Aberdeen Ave. N.E. 3//990 0150-01 Renton, WA 98055 James K.Clark 1171 Aberdeen Ave. N.E. ___.3//99O 0151-00 Renton, WA 98056 Coralie Barrett 32328 S.E. 48th ____-____3//990 _,0152-09 Fall City, WA 98024 Gerald Polack 2001 N.E. 12th St. ____ .3//9 9 O 0155-06. • Renton, WA 98055 John B. Weers 2019 N.E. 12rh St. ._-_____3//990 0156-05 Renton, WA 98055 Barbara J::cDecuir 2013 N.E. 12th ___3//29O 0157-04 Renton, WA 98056 Jessie L. Burns 2007 N.E. 12th St. 3//990 _.0158-03 Renton, WA John R. Rankin 1833 N.E. 12th _ 31/990_0160-09 Renton, WA 98055 Mrs. Gus Backman P.O. Box 143 Renton, WA 98057 Puget Sound Power & Light Co. P.O. Box 868 _____3//_990 _0162.07 Bellevue, WA' 98009 Jerry L & Ellen T Logan 1164 Aberdeen Ave. N.E. —U09c'3_0_S 9001=00 Renton, WA 980056 John J. Lund 1301 Lincoln P1. N.E. 3_3_4_3_94 -_3363-06 Renton, WA 98056 Bradley K. & Joann R. Ausen 1331 Kennewick N.E. __ .334390 3364-05 Renton, WA 98056 Robert T. Riley 1318 Kennewick Ave. N.E. 33439 O 3365-04 Renton, WA 98056 James V. Medzegian 2617 N.E. 18th St, _— Renton, WA 98055 Jan R. Frandsen 1701 N.E. 14th .3.3_*.3 90 3400-01 Renton, WA 98056 Balakrishna D. Thanedar 1707 N.E. 14th 33¢3 9_O _3401-00 Renton, WA 98055 Robert W. Edwards Jr. 500 Union St. #240 ___ _ �3¢3.90 3402-09 Seattle, WA 98101 Robert G. & Kristen A. Buren 1713 N.E. 14th St. .3.32 3.90. 3405-06 Renton, WA 98056 Puget Sound Power & Light Co. TCQ 17%c103 '' tzt,. _—_ 3_.3g39_O___3409-02 PugetvPowetf Bldg. Bellevue, WA 98004 Puget Sound Power & Light Co. Tax Department __ 3,3¢_3 90_3410-09 Puget power Bldg. Bellevue, WA 98004 • PLANNING & ZONING FEES • NAME: • PROJECT: Vr& Adet4 ::<:#>: ::<MD:e:s:c:r:i t'i'ori<:>::::>;>::>;<:>:«::::?::<<:>:::>:; ::::»:::;<:<::::<:>:<:::::;::> :::::>; :<;;.;:.;:::.:;;::.;..;.:::.::...:::.:...:.:::.... Rev.enue :Acc •::•:::::::::::,::::.�::::.::........:.::::.:::::::.:::::::::::::...:::.::.:•:::::.�:..::.::::::::::................:::::.:::::•:.:::::.:•.::::....:::::..�:.Amount Annexation Fees 000/000/345.81.00.02 . Appeals & Waivers 000/000/345.81.00.03 Binding Site Plan/Short Plat 000/000/345.81.00.04 Comprehensive Plan Amendment 000/000/345.81.00.05 Conditional Use Fees 000/000/345.81.00.06 Environmental Review Fees 000/000/345.81.00.0 015 Preliminary Plat 000/000/345.81.00.0 • 7 40. 00 50% Final Plat (General Fund) 000/000/345.81.00.09 • 50% Final Plat (Park Fund) 101/000/345.81.00.00 Final/Preliminary PUD 000/000/345.81.00.10 Grading & Filling Fees 000/000/345.81.00.11 Lot Line Adjustment 000/000/345.81.00. 12 Mobile Home Parks 000/000/345.81.00.13 Rezone 000/000/345.81.00.14 Routine Vegetation Mgmt Fees 000/000/345.81.00. 15 5-0 00 Shoreline Substantial Dev Fees 000/000/345.81.00. 16 Site Plan Approval 000/000/345.81.00.17 Special/Temporary Review Fees 000/000/345.81.00.18 Variance Fees 000/000/345.81.00.19 Other Misc Planning/Zoning Fees 000/000/345.81.00.20 • Maps • 000/000/341.50.00.00 7041 Photo Copies 000/000/341.60.00.24 Publications 000/000/341.60.00.24 Postage 000/000/05/519/90.42.01 7055 Sales Tax 000/000/231.70.00.00 9998 immummummallmmallgmamommapqmamgmllacimmgmoimingfigam BY: r • DATE: I7 jjj q0 •• • , •• . : '• ••••••,... ' '•• . • •• • •..J.:•./1,',;' • t':•,;.-IA.':: •• •";-•1••••• •••••-1: ,,••.''.•••::."i• " ••0:.!iltic'.C:'.ir...'.. .i, i••;•'1,,i%:. ,.':',';:,' '-'•••:,;.?.:.c'. ••-• •••.21;:•;,i'i; :. : '••• i' . ..-.;,••,1...-. .•...:,:' ;. ,• . ' :;:,..‘...,''''.:,(;.;' .. . . • .... , ....::,.tl'i'.•;i:::;'.''...':'''•.. .:;-. '11.'• 4:''...'t''';'!..'.:*:''' ''.. •• ! .','..:;.' . , , ,..•., ,.' ,•t,..!:•;•,•. .:, .4)", •••...i.,..:%;', . -:.' fl...,:e...,,,,:• . ';,•'.::: ; ..••• .',•.-•• ..i*-;•;;•• : • , •, .,.Z.„.‘,.;,1.,)•:--.•- '•:,... • •-•,f4..i.!?;:•:. .•'...„' ''-'....." ••";"‘,`•':'•.. .:,....:.:'.:..' ' ..,...';'. •,..,4',,y,i.,'". i•li,'.;•:".•.•":;4.`,:i. • •.'• ',..•:',•• •.' ,.r.'..V;;.-.. .. ',...•.•••t:Si,:!.'"if'',.,'• ' :'•,•1••;'i... • •••••',\:i ., ..••.::::."- ;•, ; . '.:•..'"1.-..',1::' .• : •''...' . ...:., ..qiii'•11,1..,....',.......":•.":,'... •-,.•..:,'..•c•:•.•'.....'-,.'1:.i.....,•.::1:.2",-• •••*.1;,i'il.."•:i..' • ::::.,,liy.,:.0,..,•:•''...•,:i...'d;4/,::::!.;.::::',i,,....-. .•,:..7:‘,'.-. '..,,.!"'•:;•.,,•:,.......,....,..:...., !,4:..,:i.zi,:,,,.... .• .,, ,,..,. '...,-.:.... t•,,,,,,,,..3:- ' . :. ..!....:,,...i..4..:.: '. .. . ,,,, ,.,:,.... •. • '..;.f..",.;-g...,'4,`, ...2..'"'.''''',;',.•'::::''.',,,...,,..T:::••!.,•',i)...,:;',"..., ' ;/...,.,•.,'•-.... '•:it.',P,A41:i''.,li,:..,:y:.A-...!....:4`.',4,.;!.,...,:-.•••••!;.::,•,, :•.',...,:,...•[,.,..•'••. .•.....,.:.,'•••..1. .)•;.:,.. • . •. •-..' ...,''•:'..:.•_:-..."'.....;.,:..•..:•.:..:•..:,:.:'•T-'2...!'.y-...-.;Fr4•1k•:1.ie,k,;'.„:..1,;.';.:T;4,.,•j,.,*f-:e',•::,•:.',':,..:.'':'..,0.,.•'..„,..:...',',.,.'..,.','','•'.;.....•..'.:..•..;:..j'—',.;.'.)..•?.•':::.•'..•:.•'.-,?;••;'.,:;':.,:•;..•...-'..„..:....,•••..•:.•,::•';,'.....:..i1'.,;,..'.':i-,.f":,ji::j,.•..._,..?...:'.:/'''..:..:•.4.:*..•....,.•:••1:.:•.•.•',..'::•...•.1•••.f,;.•.•.•-"•.•.,''.:''•.:,:-..'.;.,•f....•:"....:•!..•,.!;::..•:,•:,':';',..':.-'...,.••-•:,•,:•',,•.!......•.:.;:•,•:.;';!.::':'.,,'.;•.•.:'....;:...,'.,......:."..•..:••..•...:'."'.,•'S.'.••.......-.....;,::;:.:."5i••.",.,.'..!,.•:;•;1.',-'::.•......,'.:.--•:..,-•..:•:.'.•/•'3•.j•.:.:i,:,,,;."...?...'-5..si',cEl..-,,t;5.."!1;1..•:j:•..4•..1•.,k'I!k',4,..-:.r:!.:,.:..'....,:=t..,.'.;...,;!.:'...,..''!..'....•.;;-•'.-.s'....,;:.•.1:.:.•,.;•:.,,.'.•:..•,•'i•,..;.....•„.',,1,'„:,''':::f•:'.•:,••:''..!•;;.:'"'..`i1:'.:i;:'...,:'..'.•.:..'-:,,.....:..,•,:••,•:.2'••y-..••ii•.'•...,.••...:.,,:;';''.•:,.<:,:-.,::;.;•,-..:.•-..:,'•.-•.....•.':\:.,'.:•-,.'.'I:,;'"ii„l•...'••;g.•'i,•..••,...'7•.i1',.:2..'.,c''!'.i,•,;:""•.•‘,.:.:..:..•:'•...•:.:"'.,•.....•.',•:.,.............;..,•:'.•,.'.•.4:4•'•'.•1,,4,-.;.,1.:..i•k..1,,..,!...,14.,.1,g01.,1..:,,111,,,!.•,.+.•(..•.,,;.•.;..'.;...:..,'-•.•:.•--••-.'•:'•':''•.;','..'2::.•.....,.;.•.....,.,;:'"..:'.;..,.•,;.:.,.-•.•.:•'...;.'',-i;‘•:;.'.•'-:;'...:••,—•'.•..::•:.':1,',.,:'....,-..,„'.'..•.•' .•.•.,•.•,•.•'.•:••.'-..-.....:•.,-'.,',;,s'j'.!.,...•.:.!..,-.•.'.'•i-•....•, - 4. . 11 " ) 1 • :.-,,.•.•.-•,.....-„.-...-.,..;.-•.:..,,f:,.;. •.•":•‘..;.,•'.:....:;-,;••.:,,-.•..-•';.,••..,..:;'...",.;4i..,.f;:..,,.,•1:•,•;-l;••,5',;!•t.,.;.•...„..?Y;.•.:,,..•.,X ' • - , : 1 •;' 1 ••..1: s • : : 1; :: '.. : : . ... • '‘•' ' ' .1 ; [ 4 • •,,.:#,1.;_i•..,i..:.,,.,.,.?,.•.,;,..-:..=..•...;-•:.'.;.-,•'.;• •':...'-'. ,•.'...•'...•.•.:.••...':,,•:. ..•-'..'.. •.•....(z....,.:::.....„..';....:...1,:',-•:.; •'.-,.•-•.........,•;• ::••*.:7;a:;,'..s.'...:••;•:.• ...-:•-•,.'•,.'.,z.. ..1.....• ,• '. ,:f,' • • •:,:••:4-::-.1.. . ... ... . :-. •...-",•'• •.:', :. ‘.'•-.s.:!;::1'...;.1...:,.. -• • .:•- .1 1. •,,...!:,:....:10••":,:.04.;...f:::.....•:...:"...,1.••.. -.'..-,,:•,;....'!;: f..,• .i.,,::•.::'..: ....•1,•.-.',.'.. .,-j-:•:-..-• ••••••„..;;;-.,,,•1......''',..;:i,..,' ....:`....1,-.;.-•;i.'„. . .•,-.. ,T,..,::. ..••••• :.:- ......,.,•:.• •• '••••.j.;:.....•••••:.....,' : . .. "..••• •. . . . I,•31,.•,..-.....• ...?......... •:.,...;,.;;•.J,..,•:.1,,....„....":.,.. , ,,..•„..!)•:..,. •,,....tr,„..:!i:.',..i •,........,. ... ? .4:-••-:;!:?:'. 'T'•'•,:,''....',,' •• :. .•,,I,':- ,'',.,,•'. .... r' '' -•. .,..,;„•. . •, ,. .' : ...,.,i....,,I,. - • '.,',!-.1":,•41;:',:, .• . 'i:'`J.:.•1:.1;:i''..,:';;4.•;•,',.:-.;•,...;',:'•.,•:.:',•,; .,.;•:.',/:-;;;:i;•,,1'.. .,:.‘ $ '4, .j!,•'i,,... ,..... :. i•;'••••' :".':',•::•':ii', . ': ''••••''4.):;:• •-•:: • •.::-..i:...•:. ,::".."':,'" •'-. ••••. ' '....'4'4):'.'..:2;:: ' •• .• :.: . .....-:•-• '.1':.'''.'..;'•...7).4,,t''''..;• •:.,..;'''...:::::'T'::,:.••;'..."ii.::'::!,: '," '!...i'''...fi‘•;.'-'1`.-.)!..' ,;•:•;i'..'. •?i.,;,...}11,1;::1;;:...,:,.:.:',..:;',......-; .,....'';'''),.."4..:::',.1‘....P.:',',...."'i::::i?,•!,.-,:::.'...• ..••••••''' 1151,44.,';'. . s'.......:...... .':E.:it'.;'.'s '....J.'"•,':,;1':S. .-'..: '''...,.i:';:...1..."..',1';".. '' - .. 1Y • '- :''.••-••,:.:':•: '';' -,..;:e...'-f-:.,1•''';!•'l".''.,-;:- :,•'•''!- q••••!4:s..::•:!•':-..:!Y' .:.:•,',..;•,•:L.1.,),.•'...''',,J•,::.;•;:ig,...", „, ..'',. '.4• .,:::•.•. "..'..:'''.. •.:...'... •!;',.:::':.,-1. ,• .... ; •:,..4-••••:i.;,:,,I,'•:• ';'s,......:;,.. • 1 • • • "......••'...'.-iitr..?r,..,•:,:,•,•,.•".::,.,•,;?.'•:.,',....',";1.t,'1;V.".•,•;•:,.!.ii".';'•'...":•~',;.:•.••••.../..: ‘,..'-i;...:•3...1 ),11Ti,:;:•`..,!: .•••;:,...'•.;•'•,.•:i,...• .- I't....'.".TIli,:'•,''.,. :.:i....pi:,.,.. •••••:.,• .... . .,•, :.....• ....,...,....-r .:.:,:..:,,,. . " ,..i...4...:;,.,:::•?,,i.•:•:. • • •. .., , • ••.... ...••••:.:-.. :4-api.,i.irri.„1!;.::::•••:,,isi.c.-..,..•,..:::::;,!?..;.:;.....;,,,,, ,,.?,,i,„!!;.,,.-...,!:...,,•:,..,.........:,::,-....!..i,,,,,, ,i,,.;:•.,,, ,•,;:,}•-,,••;.,„...,::;•....,:•,.,•„.ii..::•:•:.:•..,;•.;;......,,,,.-.1... ..,!,..,• •:..•-•,...,•A ;;:•i':,•':. . ••••,',.:-: •••,','..: ' ''.•;';'.',.''',. :.....•.:' . . : ':,:•...,,.•,-;•:•.i.... .. ' .:•• '. :' : ....,'••••,,,,L,,,Al,',1.-'.i::!,!;!,;:::''..t:::,,•':••••'.•,•":.'i.;'•.',1' .'?1,i,ijt.s.'...:',:i.:,:,',-.':'..•';'.• ':''.''' :.••:';' ',i1.‘ .' .'...:.11'ili;•'...:''•.....•:,'.;';')•::. i.'•''•'•!:,.•':: ''..,..‘:-:.i.2i,li,,0::::•' ..:.:: :.s ' • "I.'.: *•••••• ••••:-• • . , ..:'.:. '':. ...T.'il.,CA-'1,,..i'.- -: -.:* 1 t : .:•,'::::,`11;1. -.1•:.42,,• :;,.•...;';•'..,...,•'.':'',1;!',••1';',,';';',••••• •,-;-,-;`,....:...!:••••:,..,,-..,,t'.„:•,;•,..pot,t4.....,-,•,,-..:)... ...,i,,.!,;.,..F.1.••..-..,,,....i.i.,.......-.,....,rii`..-, : ',,•%.', •..,,$,.,it.1,i,.•.. .••.. • • •,;,.. .•':. :•• • . •'• :..,i•••••. •,::.;.:6:-:1;•;••-. ,. .•.,.,•. ..•, . . : • ..-,1,0i,?,../.4....:,,-..,•-•:.::,•,.. :,,,.,..,:•:::•••,,;=.5..,./.,,i•.,I. ,.......,.....:;•„.1•••,.,•,i.,-... .:...,..k; ,,:,/,„iii•J,•;?••••••...-i,..i.:i.,?.s•••••••:;•‘,:•.,,.•:,; ••,• .",";:.!i;-•. ,, .44 , •• -.A.:. ' . '.. •.•:•.• . ',,.--',:i., •:;:,• ' ",- s ...',.,'.,:-•'• ..,.': •-;• •,..,•: .' • •....'•::',A.,t•'•''..11 ,''. .,••:''.'...`•..:••••• ;'•'i•"•.. .•.,'.. Cii••,',•, :,'..'•••'6...,';'....'•• `•:••!';'•,i'4r.`•''.....';•::',,:'..!,Y,',.!•'e:.•• i....-;••!•'?•:•,i:l',.,. 7..:,,...-..,•••'.;sim,',Iti'i",;.'...- '•;......••.''.,.'...:,',......` : •••,',1::::,:.',, • •..,,,..'•.. .''',,. •:,;-,i..„,g,, ,. ,... - . .... •::::•.10). .,j,-,;:',.:.:•:,• ,;',•,•::,,.'4,11,....i...ti;:if•....c',...:-.,-,'.., :•:,:',....:..2 .,•-•,..,/..., ...:,.. i ,..i.,:., .... .,••,,;:,,,,.....i`41T,...,.. .i.f.,fi:,•:,.:v••sft,..‘...e.p.:,.' ,:',...'::."'.;:: ::::,••,:::;. , ...; ,..-., ..:•-•, ..-., ...irs:. .! • • • • ....,,..-yr.,,.:41i'i :,;;;•,::•.....!:,.,.!....?,, ...,--4,..:,.....i.,!.;,,,„',.... .,,•,,..fif‘i...,: :.:;;•:i-':ir,. ••••:':::: iv,,,,•,,,,,1•:,;.'..........k•, , .......;,. ..;,..,, ,,, 1:•.... ..., .,,„.74-0.1-4.,, ,......,:...i ,.. -..,:•,,,., .',....•,....':.;. •,.-••• : -, .4' : • •• •, •••''!,'• • s..•:•:':..•:• ..i!--:;',..,'...,..L:...'.':;,•,.',;,',,i.i..,:'!•••••:.:)...,•i: ,.....-...c... ,,, •:,•.'•,-i.-,.......e.',........'i....,...:....I•tz•.'••:'..-;,1:i,: :•.,-..... .1;0.#.,;••. : .", .; .•• ••• •.,::. . ,,..- • • • ••...• • •.......,`,'•.1.••• - ' .• • • - : ,',,:-.ettri.v.-',••., ..•,.:•.,,,-,• i,..-,7•,',...':-...-,•:',.-e•o -)';:t,i•:-,Ii...,•'..•4.•'''• •:;i4,1;;!;!:.'i.••••:•'..V:;•:‘-';.1''..• .....;.;•:1 ,if';' :ii '.•••••,'';i;I i• • ; ', : ...' '. ..r.. ' ; •-'-'i, ' ..., • •!...., ;`•,.i;','?s•,•• •'•.. .•••. -'::'.•'..'••••*,(1i,-i'`,'k,c,•; '.':,••.V:;',:•.ii'',...', .."5:3,.Ki.',','•:,••••',1‘i;?:•',.!'i':,•;.,.'•ii,.,,',V".'"•:',:',1 ',Ii.c.r4';O:),•':',!.1,.•.• .i.,;?iii'•:.. .'•i''',.'.,:.•'.1..:;':;'1?;!'•i i•'••,.i.'•''Z''ix.','.4'..,.•,. .:,'.,,••;;;',' ;'..';•'••••4:',.'.. ?:':-',.•'•'' • .,.• ; ' •.','....?.2;' tt .'.• • '''..':' , ,.. . :.1,:•.:;'...:0?),•::; .'':•;:::::1'':'‘:*,4:::':::;•.i':';11.::iC'I''.1'.::2'':1;N''''':•*?....ii. ..1:..•':',1.1' ' ...,..•:;.!''. r4'1:1.:..:•:".'i...:!....%''`';••; ../.'''::'..,.''i''.:;';;('.‘1,;':.''''•.:1;i'...'1.:4::',:::1"::.:','''.;I:W...:'... . .::•.''''....Yr .... '.' . ...1.;•'-'.••''''' '' •. '' '': ..l'i.• ' : '•:' " -',...":'N''..- " • • :'-,;',. • '.':1...:'...41,i :''..:.'''•:••:•2;:•..'''''..k.:''..•'',1:1:;'•:':Iii. lf:121•?.%'''.•;i1:19;:: '.'1.'' '';''.::.. Al':' ',4''.!:•••• .. ...;$1!;•!;.:•I`• 11;‘.1),S...•''' ir.;: :i4''1. :;. .1:.;.;•k.!: 1..'.•:••. ::•:::::.:•• ...:' ,.' ... •!, ..:.':;:„:11).. '• '. ;•• tf ,',. . ii:1•,,i..,.....,,T.,..„:.....: ,....••-.,,,•,;.::.,..1..?.. ..),..),....-..,;;:.:A(.,-••:::,,,:.t.,...,.c..., ,,,....;)3‘,.:;61;..,•i:•:, .......';‘....;•::;:,,,.:..•:,:::'..i.4. t..,'.2.'.,...'...°.:.::::•?!..Wif:::-...•.::..•.._.,,..., .....,-., ,... . :,...,•-•,;,...:::. ,.'..,•;..,,..,: .2A.iii,...;:iNi.f. . .. : ..'.,." .. • - ...,..,,..iriid;;."''•e, ::•:f-...-.`i.',....:::::';',:.?,•,:,.:' ,:i':.•,.:',,•:•:::''...1,4,';?..:'..;!•:,',..":'.:!••,.:•:.';'.•• .-:.'..:.4. :,..Wi.,,,.:;. ,.:'...i.•'..:.1vi'f.i...;. ;., ,;','•,::?Y,',..t, ,q ...: .1,...,.:44,;:i.,•P.:;.: • '.-::':,7,.....; ....•:,•`,.... ;•;:;'.:.•:.. ....i..:,. . ..•,/,'...--,: .; .. .. ::•.• '....,-....' I,..... , ::',i 1,•i:',.;,-,,,,,,,,,.•.'•4.;,,,,,,,,,;•.:,,...,:il.'..:,..•:•.,,.1.1, :.t.i.i.t.i'..,..!':;.;:..,' j...,.......,' !',.Y.:',...;i:'`,:•.:';•'.. (f‘...'.1::':'.•2 %Iiir1%;•. . '1:. ..::•: '" ".;:': :•'.j'';: ' ' ''•.... •::::?..1•.''''''")`.:. .••' • ..• ' . • ' •'''''''')all'?,' .-':'•; ''' !:•:'• ';)''!!2;: ;'.:1';'41•1:::.•''.......;1•.'i';',..;''.•;''''1414•11.4:Y'. : '''•r‘;',?.-(.:.';',(•••,..•.',',.;;!!,..•-'•';','•'.e,1;i,..1.••",..• ',•••• l•,."1,..:••• • ':': •••:•::. -; •..:•,'•• ..'''',‘,•-.; : . • ...•':',.,;.2..).'IP...•..." . • • ...-: . • •:::•'...‘,A. i.,..1..:..., :c ; ....,,...,....,....,.....:,,q...1...,,,,-.:: \,.;:•:..,,,,.;.',,,,, ,....t..'..........,;:',:k.... ....;.:...:......;:i :.: .. ..'.......': :-...,:;:' .: ... .. ' ..s. .' .:... , :. .•... •. .,..,. -......:' •.:-..,‘:.:.,'.,:l.f..3. -. ..: ... ..:. ,.(..e.,::;14.,...., ..,:...,,,,..• *„.,A.,1.,"!....:,`:' •.:;.',,:.'%•'"..r::: , •••:,11!::•2...'.2:•. ..'..:!....? .•I!..e..?""-:f........ ,... .:.1:1::,.,•51 . • :,..,... ..,,....•,..'....,. ...,..:. .f...,.. ,, ,,..,..f,...,f1.1.....-.: •.... : • ...•........4:::,..,..if..,,,...:,..:,... ..,....,.. • ,. ,,.,... .• •,.., . :•• .. . .::. ...•:.,,,,I,,,,..: • . . ..• . - :..,-,..:0...)...1:4:,•.,..y...:.., .,'.-•:,. • ,,. .,.,...,,,,,,. .....,•. ••. .... . ..,... ,, . , " ....v:2•:.:i.,4,t., • .,. . ''''',..1!..X:',1.',.:•-:•.' .....____ i:Y. '1, ,!•!,., • ', ..'-.! . :.•;'•Y• •."-•••.,.::••:..- .•,.. •,, - .• :.,...s;g:.•„%,...C,'.,. • .•• ; --- .';';'...1.c($1,;),....:•. ' •''•:,','.:',' .• .;."..1.'. :'...'i :, , •.:.....,',.• ';.•,:'...:::::V.111;•,,„'!,. .. ', -.- ..-•'.•'.. ''..-.:.1:!;i•V•4 ''.:•.••J,''':'•'•'...... CITY OF' REN1"ON • • _. .. i - ;•.'..,,,,,'..t.. • • ••••' • • •• ' • ."•••• - — CITY TREASURER • •'1 .. : •••:•.,. .'?:.11.,: ....i•-••••••••••••,,••••• • -: -•,...,..,:::,0:1,,,,,/;f,,,,,•,:,,,.,,:.:2.,,c.',. . ••:••.."'•'•.':':'.•'-'•.':i'•-...'•'..'-;,.-...•'.:.•'::..,..:;..,..::..'.'.....:'A.1\i.'0Ft;t;!i,.'•.,•.:.,*1'c^i,;'•t."P!••'.'1',:'-.i:'ii,,.',...•...,''.;••i,'.''••-'.•'..•.:.'..-.:..••;•..•,•.'...•.•••;;•••.•,,•.'•i•.•:'. R E GS/R CP T 02-1100 09-17-1990 —'(AiiER II) 8 2:38 PM i1I'1:.•' Z,'.','''•...•',•,,,.•PtZ.1•tA•A,;A,4:'„.°9i.;T1.r4s1,.,...•.'i".,•--.:-,;;',..":...,,,•:,.!:`.',.;...1:.'•,'•••.•..•:.::.';:.:-:'',.::•-..k-!•:.,,i,.;.....1,''...:.::". -.•.,•'.';'..?,,,'t:,;;':1;,.f::,‘::,,,'.''.,,.,•:•.:...,'..:,•.,':•.'•A,':::''•.••...••,••.•:•,,;,,.'•!'',.'.' ,.,.;.......'",.•,:•.',,',;•/",..-.'.\.1f.i'',,'.,,y';;:..;•.•‘T'A:4 : - = I ' ' . , 'ii1:i.'.:5",..:'',,'.-'•,'....,-.•.,....•'....,.•',.•..".,..',..-.;,..:.•.'" ,'.8000 ilISCEL.L.ANEOUS RE $172.50 ' ,,,..',1.,.:,,i,..,0!,/,,l);,,4••,•-..• ::::1•/,,;,..;,;.,,,',-,..,...0..• ',...,*:i.;'".?.• ,..:•,,.,,J,`•• t•",,I,•:!. .... ,'. .-,.:' ••.'••.; ";-'''...1,':!.:•::3!;‘1P?,,i','•,',.;;;:•,:••.'. .."'. ENV I RON11Eli TAI... REVIEW FEESk':. •• :...•....', ••;•-.,:. '.: ' -.•:-...;i:;. .,:•-•;•.:::1'• ';••: ',:"..1.- •-• -".is• ••..,•••••;,,:.•:. ,••;•;;...:A,..41,•-47, .T•.;:?•:.•:,•.:.,....,...'•':. GOO.000.00.34.5.81.00.00 in ci 07 '..::J..1-•11. ‘,.:,:aF-4.. :.,:. • -..•.-•.•-• .: .........,- ,. . ."...4.,,,'.'... . •..'. • .•:,';‘•,... -••,::"':10..,"•;.,'„ ,•;''.. ..:•: ."..,.;• 81300 11 I SCEL_LANEOUS RE $740.00 ,,••••••1 ,...!.•:....1:•;li:1:......... . .....:•,:,''...4.,.•v!..,.f.::',..;;;;,;:.:' •••,'''T';'./. ..',......%:-‘..".':'.....: :•••...,•::'•,:•,','.?.,;,'Il';',•; •.•• ,. • '••,' •' I.'.•. :••••':,!•!: ::''..;:',",;:.„,..til;?:,..17.'''..i,:'•.:!:•....';•,...'.. PRELIVIINARY PLAT ','•.'.:;....'.'s!. ,;-.1•••.'..... '....',.,.,'''.•••••::,,'",..:::;.:::•:;:;:::%.••. .';;;T.::),',;..•'''•':...::;',,•.'' ,....i.,4 ,11; ..•'.•'...:•1.....' ••:.. ...''. •'•:',,3'.`...t.,fi,',-.'2-••":••••' ;;'.. • Ono niln nn 3 riri 81 On Orini109 ' - i:At,,.;.. :'•;....i.,,11.;:::.;U::.: •,...;'.;•f.j.•...::•/;',[.• ..,'::;•1''...5*•...,.' r..,:.1... ,:, '• ...;IY....,.'LNP.0;;;,'::: •.: .,. ', 81:100 l'IlSCELLANE(3115 RE $1F.50.00 • ::•• • 0. .?.;,.,•••• • ••.1..., ..•-,,,,..r.,..• •• ,• •••••.., ,..,;. ,. ,•,,,,r•z,-.? .' . •". '..'.'. • .-•-:.•;..;.i.,i.,`4,,,.•;:..141!];,:t•::.•:' J•:•••••• ROUT INE VEGE TA T ION MGM FEES , •.. .1.,...i.--.I,.0..4,,.: . :.,...i......x.;::-.....y •-..;;•;;:.,.: • '..:,:•:'• •''.'';''.•,:.-i:•••''.4 •'• . •-, • .• ' •r• -•:,.::11.:,1;;ki.;•'•'.....'..: •!:' 000.000.00 345.31.CIO.000015 ; .• • •''•••':.•'•:171f,'‘.7;;;`:!•1•••',;•• :.•'•-',.•. ----------•-•••••••---- ...';.•:'•'...liaAt.:••,• • .' ''.i.• •:i...:......':;'-`1:.' •;.'.' •';,':1'. ', '.‘'('::::.; . ',..".A.:'‘'.§.g.2. ,:' . ..,' .• :.• : ••.' ,:•:.0,s•;',,,•5';',"•••,',..r.• .';''.•,. TO•IAL D1JE $i p 0 62..10:-,0 ••••••...-.i.,• A,,=.4)!,,.... :i.;••...,i;.• ••'.; l',.., .r-::?.."„:'•!.. " '.•:::•.; .-•••-:,•.;•;,:.1.f.'•'.,;.:,:...: '•,• .•'.. .". . .,,.......y,,t...?.:1,4-:"P...::: ',.. •,•:, , RECEIVEDFRO11: '.';....:•,:,,A,...?,,i"kli.i...;•,. -''' :1,...- .....'.:-..,:..-,,‘• .'..,..".••.::,>*::, • '.','.',.•. -s'';;;;';.,!"•,;',..Zt:' • . ' .• . '..:•••••••'-',f,'?.'".•'-'.V.-.:.'''.1:1';•;•": WOODLAND I 11 VES TrIENT GROUP . -•'•••.'..,':,,,i-1,fii•,',.•::,• ...•:., . ' .`..q,.....''''''.'' ':•':' CHIC 11, $1,1362. ...0 ',' •l',.....,yi.',:l'kft:,' ;: . '':•:•"-•• •••••: ••• ."-• •••.'-2.•••••••!?,• .. ' ••• '; '• .,...r,j,..;",1,;',1,,L,',:'','•• •:'... ' "u•.'' '''i14.-,. .."•<, :, •'•....,..,.....• ••••,.'••:::' •,' ' .-•, --•••<,.;::,cr.,1. - • •c ..- ... , < •,...,,,,,.„ ••••,„ii. :•.11,?;•';.•< .:•,,.., ,;,•.,, .. . •• ',...' ,-,:,:f';,"••,.;, TOTAL *FEI,IDERED $1,1362.50 _ _ . 0.-..1 ..,?ii '' b..' '•'•''' ':- ‘• ''''-'•",-• is •: -.• N','''''7'' • . . ".' ''. •," ', •-..'•'•`,',1`-i•ili-:*;/.,;•',(• ''''.:. ...... . ............_ • • • ',-'.•.,;•0:..‘,:iM:,;', . ':.*;,....,' '.!:,',.'.,... '1,:•,:,,.......;.' •f:,,,,''• .: ''',..,:;),,,'•;:.if:;',,t,';- , ,. ',.., CHANGE DUE •.::' ',''.: .'':j:.'•'',,''••,,'...::''.':'4&,V)i.Z.;4:f0ilqi,,;,,,,..'':',..,,..'..'.";''.'-:..:..•...:'.','.:.,' • . --=O==.00 , ',,I:.:;•':','..;...i....!t;,";..--.‘,';',:.)i‘,t ':-.,.••1'.,.•,i;•e•,e,,,'v,..... „..• '•,,•."..•..,..-, •••...'..',•'-L•,•.:.-?:•;;:•,0:-i; 7 , k , ----------------------------- - , '• ,. •- , , ;Z,;,.;.,.'.,•,••::,••••-,•,•1":'-',-,•.-.',.-,•i:;.,•:•---.,•-,•':..'••,...,,- ;...-•,•.,i,,,'i)7,7,,'.4,:$+`;',-.-..,. ':..:.'.....2,...-?." ir:,....;''.. • -.. .' .. ;:f)'. ,!:-...1•:• .;'.•.......,• .:!:•. •,..,i`.•%-ii..'1',4,i,.. . , • :.•:' 1 .i,-. .:1:; :, 1.‘....,::. • .....,..,.•'.•....,:',.... ... .‘,.,i..:-.;',..-,...•.....••:;:-4.!. ','....;fi.[1:.'..4.-,,...,-4'... I.' „....., • ....- q:,....,L-.4 ;....3,,,!'.,..1,-:-....-...',?..:.,..,'!,, .:;.,',':,,:. .• .::, '::"..:i'..!.'.."*";',:;.;"•,.`,"';';,.....,.,,tly,."'''. ,. ..'...T.. ,. • . ::, .......,.....:'!,''',.;,.'..i'',1' ..?:..i11' '•'1:'''•-, •,1••••..... • :.)'''..•.".'fi,:•i.i...',• ,:.' .,', :.' . ' '. . ,.:P.:.;,:4A;i:.-, .,.....••• '''•'''....1.. • • '':•:-'p.,,tit::......,-.....::......, .•.,•-....t,....6 i4t.:.4,,r,!,'.i• . ..•'...V:. ,...-.!r•' (..:.,:'..!',;.• ,• ',;..,;'.; • •'-,!,','7,...4 .:.' : • ' i........,.. ,?,...., " 14' '';''''...:',..'iC *.'•"-... .....;','..;•'.....• :',.;;',V;,. ,i•j•K,'!.,., '.',..,;,..,:, :;'.„..-1.(:,;,,,' .- . ....,.....• ,I ..: .•:,'ti)t:7„1A;„'.,-,1•:'. ;:t,•••• i-,.....:.(4:::;•,z-,i,iii'licii,...4•;: ••''::.;:2 ., ., ...i....' ... ,..?.•,,, : ,, •,i!.,!:•,;,;-,•,•;,,,,.p..•,• , :•,.,.,':i.,i.1,,f I','......1,....,-...,..,• .' ..:',.':,:;1; , i, ••; .,.,.', ,.,•,.•,..i!':,!;.t.,,1.•,:.T.1......:. ,r,, •..;., ... ... •:. ' ::::C.....'!'.1tni!Ci'l 1.4.'....:1''..2. 11.':'...I'....:'4"..;..'•••••,.:4'.1...,I,..:••••.i Vi•:. 1-...'4.%•'7. '':.i 0•''''ir r.'f'4':.N:r•Il•77:::.'.47'7,.0'...!'''.',''''',',11:''..;.1'••'.•,.;•.3'.7:3•11••:,!'.;:;.',;•••.,:.''.;c(klidt.i',..;...,...i.;,-,,.., , ,.,, ..,..c, ;;;,.:,, '' '','';:( • ,'.,;.:,..',,1'.Po:;,.',. '. ;...?,,:.' ,•:•,• .• ',1'`.••••,,041 :4:t..^..",:• ,;•!.!••'::,::•"!•1"•;:‘'A ,.,•'•.:"•;•',i...`,.i..,.:,-.,•;.,1,!.•,:.'•.•.,'..:,..•))1;it,,;?.e,t.,;•.•',1;,.r.;!•,',',,,Wii;"'',',..i0;•v •,•,'....,.,.-p.i.,,,,. :.y......•rifel"ti`,!,i,;•:••; 7,......,'': . ..•:•;3•••, ,'...,..i,:,"'',• ',*1 •‘.'"*.).:*ti*:*':i,...i:,-.'. .'.. .•'''.'.:1'': ..,'.,'.'* *.';.':,;';',.,1.,Z,::;,,,,,,,,.,,,'.,•,,,;.,„:-. ...•„:,......., ..-:,,,,•,:,,,if...:.5.i7,..,,,,,',.::,..!,:•.•,-..t.,,;:.:,, ....:,,: :,i..11:. ,•: ....,•.'*..) A,1!0,,I..'+.: •.:'..C..,';:,t,iiIVIt..'f ,, ..'-...•.;.W:;';'*I.Csyit3.•'. ..•,'„,,*•,,,::,'.•,' .-.r..,;'. ' ' ::..;';'.';',.','•: ..',*':.;::::',,!..:•'•'..1'-;. .... -,. .'•0:•:':.::::'''''..4,'...;:‘:44.1•12: 'l*'...- •..,l: .• '' ..:. ' ...i.',.,',•',U.:tif,'''..,.. ,:',* ;' ''.:'...,.5:•V•..i.•.1..t•-•*.!.;1 ..4:-..,•'.;,":. .:1•,;':' ...,*iftiiliff,O ,Vi.:. *!••'.....?1*V$'•:.* '..Y11.Y,.i:•1.'1.(k1:;. ...,!1*;,•:''',.;' f'. ,..4.":;`?,,i•:,.•'•,:', '2.•:. .1.•'.'',:, ',e•;:-;•'•,. '...,.. •1•"..V,,...• ...;,:••••,‘,. ; •,..!.:..15,1.--A..r.,,:..•:. • ,.;•,!.••,, • '.- . ',...•:: '4470-`-'4;•;;:;?Ii'::.-'...::;......:•....;'•';',...i'''...it'i".i,':'.•••,i...';•?j•:•,;.''..i?•,...iiit`.. ''t.'• •;'.'....i,kt.,.:),-4;.:•'i,:k„.•'• •.,•?i;'!:14,,:•,•.-MV:?•"'•?i''UY','•• •••.‘:•i•,'' f:1 ' ',.'::"1::•:,• .';:':i•• ....i.. .............,.:, , . •,'..• ....:•.•..'..'•••,:1•••ti: ,'.....:,;••.:::?,',"...,..••.,..•,..,..i":; .. ... - • :: ;.;)ivy4-i..,,,,,,i-2.:-.4••,5.-..:,,••••,.....i:,•••;'..,.'.!.;sv..-:,%.,•••••:".:-..-4i'-••••;.•,,.';..-:, . ,',.',..1.41,,,-,...i.t.":„.,.4.4.tpi..,:',.,,.i ,..-,..,,.,r4. ... ...:!...,„--..:,1-,, t..,,-.:\.',...,..,. -•,...-.:;:••,:••••;:,:::,..:,,,,... •i.......,.....:2.•'.,..'..'•-f.`•:."?.;-"Ig...',...:1•..?),?.',.'..•.....44......•::".--•-• • ... ••••••••••v,t,t''rc,,:',..,!..s 4'"''''0:•,',3,;•••;',......4.:,;',,,,t.,?;:„.1:.,:31 ..;•:','"••!'“g:f1!•''.1.,'*;i7.'.•.• ' 4e'f,A.:::•?rry f.•,i. ...1•4•,..Y,....:-;:t.' 0,...:'•geft•r10",•• ' '-..`''•• ' •"•'''',.•' '':,•••• '••• "' ••''' -•''''''''i''•-• ••'•' ''''2.":::',:.'.''''''.35'+,'''.7;•:•'',111?,,4;;'''''i{,i'''i:::'"...'.,‘';':•:;:!i::''''2;:l.''''',!;;;•:••• •11'.•:•'••!'‘,1.‘'•';'''./'.:•?1:".•r;•••'')' ''''':-•'.':'::`•••:"1:i4.4?411.;.1'.!.'il71."1•:s-'-'•;P:;i4.;!.i:',• :'''t'il'N:V•;*•).,•.,4i•:•';'.;•;'.''''',•;••0.2'.1",•Y'; ' ''?''i'.''. :• ''.:...:..;.i'-! ' .•,I;ti'',:''''''': , ':::'' ''•::'::''41.•'r:'•,t',:?'•'•:..:: .. ....,•..1.2: '.:..:, ...:.`:-.;,.::.•:•••‘i•'i.;•.'•::..:'..41.•!:.1:y,,,,'1;:i:''',...;.;:':,:'-,..',.;1,.'''....•'::.:;i:f?i•.,i.'.:,...;!•1',',,1"..'i':::''',!;:".:1: ::••i.',!,,,...,,;;,?t :,,'',.;.•:*;:5114.•;! i',,•:I.:If;:i,i,•••.' N•it'l:,,;.•',,,,,•,.1•:,•,,!,..:7.•••';:i•i;:,k,',IT,..i:,•:;,..:::.;•:4;.;14ttki 1 1. -.. ,.•::,,„'',...,y,''..••:i',.::'ilf.1‘,:• 2,•.;•.1,..!;,' -•':.,:•-,1 •':•:e•'.;.'..;i:4,;";;!'(:1.;•11.,•;•,•:-.....:• '', ..-',: ,• ...,•; . ... ;'..,. .,i;i"it,,fy..Itlir,- ; • '.P.''‘.._•.:' .•_:!.%,,••;.':,.'.......;'.::"'..,!':.P,'ii;.••,,"'' •tr. .411.,Ci,'.1:A.f•Vi"r"S•,,,,•-rtl :.,',''1+,F7.11`•:-•l'Aii'..'., '•..,,•',: 0 ;-.i-.: • • • . (•