The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutWWP2700022 SAN-1 TALBOLT HILL LID 244 S-22 SAN- TALBOT HILL LID 2YY S-22 _ I I t. !:ct. 12, 197'_ Mr. Eugene Harris 731 - S. :9th Streit Renton, Washington. 8055 Reference: Latecower's Pee,,L.I.H. No. 244 Tract A8, Renton Co-op Coal Co. 62 Less W 1/3, Less State t.igt!way :war tar. Harris: Upon your request, w_ have calculated a sanitary newer assessment in the amount of $553.06, which would be vour latecomer's fee for connection to t1w sewer system installed under L.I.D. i1o. 244. This amount must be paid in cash to the Utility Division, )epartment of Engineart. g, 4th floor, City of Renton municipal Building. U?on payment Of this tea you must also apply for a sanitary sewer permit and possi n street break permit from the same city department. "he City requires the side setter contractor must be bonded and licei.sed with the City of Renton. very truly yours, Mounir H. Tom&, Y.E. 6ssign Engineer 1af;ten / A: �j i A c 4 iF! 'Tre,9c7 g — 1-1-oA4- z c� . ass !�'%3 L ss S7�tr f Wy 7S"' 33, IV k 74- x -3G) ro �0 4� 76 x a'G x oc = �, -j �S (rl�AL 1.A=�'s c� •� �� 30S" k' In the Matter of State Route f .....SH No............... Renton ViciniLy: Carr Road to Grady Way E KNOW ALI, MEN BY THES2 PRESENTS, That the Gro:=;'s Eugene H. Harris a.id Mary M. Harris , his wife on Novemb?r 30, 1950, and at all times.since, (y! for and in consideration Of tite Sum of TEN AND N0/1r10 ($10.00)------_--...._-------_Dollars, I and other valuable c-asideration hereby convel, and warrant to the STATE OF WASHINGTON, the following described real estate situ- ated in King County, in the State of Washington, to the same extent and purpose .as if the rights herein granted had been acquired under Eminent Domain statute of t, the State of Washington: All that portion of the following described Parcel "A" lying Easterly of the following line: Beginning at a point opposite Highway Engineer's Station (hereinafter referred to as H.E,S.) 396+75 and a distance of 80 feet Westerly, when measured at right angles and/or ! radially to the centerline of SR 515 Renton Vicinity: Carr Road to Grady Way; thence Southessterly in a straight line to a point . �posite H.E.S. 395+85 and a distance of l 60 feet W esterly therefrom; thence Southerl parallel with slid centerline to a point 4 opposite H.E.S. 394+50 and the eno of this line description, flj PARCEL "A" The East two-thirds of Lot 8, Plat No. 2 of Renton Co-Operative Coal Company's Acre Tracts, according to the plat recorded in Vclume 9 of Plats, page 27, in King County, Washington. By initialing the appropriate space below, the undersigned agree(s) to surrender posses- sion of the unimproved property herein conveyed on but not prior to receipt of payment therefor.r—_ ,_,g� (Initial) The lands herein conveyed contain an area of 3,400 square feet, more or less, the specific details concerning all of which are to be found within that certain map of definite location now of record and on file in the office of the Director of Highways at Olyr.,pia, 't and beating date of approval November 5, 1971, and revised December 24, 1971, and the centerline of which is also shown of record in Volume 5 of Highway Plats, pages 94 and 95, records of said county. I i `i k E i 9 l i1r i I I i l it and obligations hereof shall not become binding upon the State of Washington unless and unti, accepted • aril approved hereon in writing the State of Washington, Department of Ilighteuts, by its Director 1 or his duly authorized represento..ce. Dated this .29th ___. ...day of......_ Janu„ar.y,...1975............. 7�� 7• �fli-tit� � Accepted and approved X. __...._ Date STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS By... ............................... Title: (Individual acknowledgment form) STATE OF WASHINGTON, se. County of _ King _ _._..... I I, the undersigned, a notary public in and far the State of Washington, hereby certify that on this 29th . . ...... day of. January, 1975 _ ... .. ..__personally appeared before me .._ Eugene H. Harris and Mary M, Harris to me known to be the individual; . described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that...._Chey .signed and sealed the same as._their free and voluntary act and deed, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. Given under my hand and official seal th? day and year last above ritten. f' G��. Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, Residing ai.._ ......................... ' (Corporation acknowledgment form) STt TE OF WASHINGTON, County Of-- On this .__ day of.. ....... __.... ..before me personally appeared . .. ...... .. ......and._ . . _.. .._...___................. ...... to me known to be the....... . ........ . .. _._......and...... ...... . ... _ of file corporation that executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation, for the uses and pr poses therein mentioned, and on oath stated that.......____..........__........... _...._._..............._authorized to execute said instrument and that the seal affixed is the corporate seal of said corporation. Given under my hand and Dfficial seal the day and year last above written. Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, r ResidinguL....___. ...____..........._.. ............._.............. g ,t x A > o a e E, i a r _ W.AMA a - 4 OF Roy� THE CITY OF RENTON a MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH.98055 �p 0 AVERY GARRETT,MAYOR FINANCE DEPARTMENT 40, GWEN E. MARSHALL, DIRECTOR 4rF0 SEP'TEt� March 6, 1973 l Re: Sewer Assessments L. I.D. ?, 244 { Talbot Hill 6 Listed below are the delinquent Sewer Assessments on the property owned by King County: Principal Interest Penalty Lot 4 Block 3 Renton View $46.84 $23.42 $3.31 Lot 5 Block 3 46.84 23.42 3.31 t Lot 6 Llock 3 " 46.84 23.42 3.31 Lot 7 Block 3 46.84 23.42 3.31 i Lot 8 Block 3 46.84 23.42 As per loth Installment $234.20 $117.10 7 '•!EM!)PhNUU� TO: Cerr-; Shellan >f rch 12, 1975 I" Ted Sennett SUPJECT; L. I , V. 244 Assessmonts The on,-losed map outlines five i5) parcels of proporty which were Included if, L. I , D. 244, which our records show are owned by Klnj County And for whic', no pnymonts have been made for ten ( 10) voars. I cniled tho County lest week And they indizitod It was tex title property end was under the t^�nsmission IL 1 c`ecf'ad r;�� .• r , , -.r•nn )opartmPr' and they edviswd It was n^•.3,.• .n "," • i4'r tons r4 ♦•,e r:;nc - 1 forminl method. The ^ounty lndicatwn tho aca.,:,sn,ents wa Id nor be nhiu untlI such time as the r-party Is sold ind it seems unlikely to me that anyone would ever buy the property. Must wu continue to carry the Assessments on our rolls, can we ray the Assess- ments from the 1'unrnnty rand -r lust what cnn wo do. Ic Fnclosure CC- Ewen Marshall s 1 �A OF `11-'+ `tw v 7 UF'FWEOVT11V ('1'1`Y \'1"1`0M\F:1' • It1{N'COV,\\ \�IIIXG'1`(1N O POST OFFICE BOX 626. 100 ?NO STREET BUILDING. RENTON, WASHINGTON 98055 At PINE 5 8618 D! (D GFRARD M. SNELLAN, CITY ATTORNEY �P )ONN M. PAIN, )R., AS5ISTANT C-TY ATTORNEY A4TF0 SE PS EEO March 14, 1973 Mr. Ted Bennett Utilities Department City Hall Renton, Washington 98055 i Re : LID 244 Assessments Dear Ted: Thank you for your merle of March 12 , 1973 regarding certa_n delinquent assessments against King County in connection with the above LID. We presume that the City had ccmplied with RCW 35 .49. 070 in giving proper notice to the Coun at the time of the assessment . Please also refer to RCW 35 .50 . 030 indicating when the City has to take action in case of delinquent assessments. This should be followed by the City in all cases . You did not indicate in your memo what amount of delinquency is involved and we are therefore unable to suggest any immediate solutions. Is there a possibility that the County should not have been assessed at all if the sewers did not enhance the value or the property, being under the transmission line right of way? Assuming the transmission line is permanent and no structures can be built under said line , on what basis did the City then assess? It would probably be impractical to bring foreclosure proceedings against the County since the amount may not be large enough to warrant such action and secondly, very few persons may be interested in purchasing said property at foreclosure sale , including the City. Is there a possibility that the County may quit claim its interest to the City in which case we could then cancel the assessment? Finally if everything else fails , you might resort to the previsions of RCW 35. 54 .010 , et seq relative ' D the Citv' s LID guaranty fund. Incidentally, has this LID been pa i off in its entirety and is there a surplus, by any chance , in the r-,ind or what is the status thereui? I • r f Incidentally, we also want to call your attention to RCW 35 .53. 010 et seq regarding the property to be held in trust in cases wnere the City is the successful bidder at foreclosure proceedings of LID assessed lands . This undoubtedly would apply to the recent Fumio Go situation that you had encountered. I shall be glad to get together with you whenever you wish to discuss this matter further. n We remain VEry my your., Gera d :" Shellan 7 GMS :bm P. S. Please remember that RCW 35 .53 .010 was amended by Chapter 52 , 1967 Session Laws . W i f E 're I IR