Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutWWP2700170 SAN-1 LID 285 S-170 1X i SAN-I Leo 285 Orillia Corespondence 5-170 t �i ' I / I I 1 z i *t+TTg�►+gtlur177mTF[itpin:� - K 111 F I ) J i L.LD BOUNC 1R�!"� N Y - i �_ I i � s W. r e � I C 17Y CIF Rf- N ? 0N _—_- 6Na ... r. ,< . L.I.D. Z85 PROJECT MAP ``FE 9-Z7-73 GEc i"-wo, 1 1 \. l - w) i erti ro " . nZ I ; r 1 a PROJ EGT +- LOCATION o ' J II r--�_ G1TY OF REN tCIN -�RNGInZ. vrn r� r, h .. L.I . D. 285 \/ICINI-T'Y MAP Gsc 3-4-'74 r•woo. i l s DATE ?0: V. Lee V. TeGantvoort J. Williams D. Hamlin R. Nelson D. HoughtoF9 D. Bennett T. Touma / ✓ Chervl FROM: Warre onnason SUBJECT: Review ind report back . See me. Route end return. -- Prepare response for my signature. —i� Take appropriate action. _ Prepare special report. Set. up meeting. For your information. Fi lc REMARKS: 1 t � INTEROFFICE MEMO ` TO : Delores A. Mead, City Clerk DATE: Dec 24, 1974 Gerard M. Shellan , City Attorney SUBJECT: LID 285 Dear Del : We are handing you herewith original and one copy of proposed Ordinance confirming the assessment roll , as modified and revised by the City Council , for LID 285 . Would you please have the Public Works Director insert the proper amounts in Sections I and III , and the Director of Finance should insert the amounts specified in Section 1 :1 . We assume, of course, that the Public Works Department has on hand a revised assessment roll , based on the Council action of last monday, and that the revised assessments be furnished unto the affected property owners as the earliest possible date . Would you also please forward to us a copy of sail revised assessment roll so that we may attach it to our city of this ordinance. Upon approval and completion, would -you please forward the ordinance to the Legislation Committee fo appropriate action. We remain �er truly your9' ` Gerard M. Shellan City',Attorney GMS:bjm Enc. (Proposed Ordinance) JAN 197ti CITY,CF N[N� jq F I,P Ii' N'ryR'°i 4.; k i (IhY Y December 23, 2974 DeZ Mead, cnty CZerk Tom Tomna, OfAce Lh, {neer 4seeeement RoZZ - LID 285 OriZlia Sam Lary Sewar y Adjuetrente have Ivan made to the attached aeeeeement roll. Mpmp A t tachiw t } CITY Of' RFNTON F NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BY RENTON CITY COUNCIL NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Renton City Council has fixed the 23rd day of December _ , 1 9 7'4 at 8 : 00 P . M . in the Council Chambere of the --rt-, `!,nicipa1 Building , Renton , Washington as the time end place for a public hearinc to consider the following : Final Assessment Roll L.I.D. 2851 Sanitary Sewers, S. W. 43rd St. and West Valley Hwy.., Orillia Area (CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING FROhl 12/16/74) Any and all interested persons are invited to be present tc voice approval , disapproval or opinions on same . CITY OF RENTON Delores A. Mead , tity Clerk DATE OF PUBLICATION 12/20/74 E R T I P I C A T I STATE OF WASHINGTON) SS. COUNTY OF KING ) 1 , - ' I. hereby certify that three ( 3) copies of the,+F.ove not. i :e were posted by me in three conspictous places .�n the property described and one copy was Posted at the "Ity Municipal Building , Renton„ Washington on date of , Signed A'r TEST : Notary Public in and for the State Of Washington , residing at Renton. INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM DATE: December 23, 1974 TO: Public Works Committee i FROM: Warren C. Gonnason, Public Works Director SUBJECT: Final Assessment Roll - Oriilia Sanitary Sewer Project - L1D 285 The Department of Public Works has reviewed the method used for e Final Assessment Roll of LID 28S to provide an equitable means o, assessing the properties which are located on the west side of the railroad track, arid, in particular, the two parcels of real estate owned by the Ralpn Leber Co. , Inc. Since the terminus of the sewer line is terminated at the south end of the Ralph Leber Co. property, the Department of Public Works recommends to revise the zone and termini along the east end to the south end of the above-mentioned parcels. Also, it is recommended that the assessment against Mr. McFarland, Tax Lot 35, be deleted because it abutts the hest Valley highway and approximately 400 feet from the installed facilities. The above changes repr ant an increase of $2,759.73 to the assessment for the properties which are located west of the rail- road track. This increase can be resolved by: 1. Distributing the $2,759.73 among all property owners on the west side, which will represent an additions! 1.813% to each individual assessment. Charge the Utility Department for the adjusted amount of $IrnO4-t3 r�sf3�,p7 ' Warien� Gonnason, P.t;. Public Works Director MNT:ad i i f ►" i. TITS, CITY OF RENTON z MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO, RENTON, WASH. 98055 P b AVERY GARRETT, MAYOR 0 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 0 Warren C.Gonnason. Director �4T�D SEPAE- November 13, 1974 1 t k?oncrable .Avery Garrett, Mayor Members of the City Council Subject: Final Assessment Roll - L.I.U. 285 ., Orillia Sanitary Sewer Project I a Gentlemen: Submitted herewith and recommended for approval is the Final Assessment Roll for L.I.D. 285. The construction of the sewer trunk to serve the properties which abutt the northerly margin of S.W. 43rd Street have been deleted from the district because of the proposed widening of S.W. 43rd Street from East to West Valley Roads. These properties are not included in the assess- ment of this district. The total assessn,-nt cost to the district is $230,042.65. Very truly yours, Warren C. Gonnason, P.E. Public Works Director MHT:sn Attach. 1 _ I THE CITY OF RFNTON a MUNICIPAL BUILDING 203 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 MIR I AVERY GARRETT. MAYOR 0 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT f' �p Warren C Gonnason. Director 0941E_0 SE-PICOO NovemLer 13, 1974 b' Il P �J Honorable Avery Garrett, Maycr !0 Members of the City Council I a Subject: Final Costs for Orillia Sanitary Sewer Project - L.I.D. 285 Gentlemen: Iw Submitted hereiwth and recommended for approval are the final costs to be charged against subject L.I.C. 285. Contract $219,358.95 City Attorney - Fee 69r.00 City Attorney - Legal Service 385.00 Citv Clerk 1,354.13 Finance Department 3,273.39 Bond Counsel 700.00 Engineering Services - Lat,or 14,271.18 Engineering Services - Egsipment -6- Utilities -6- Street Department -6- TOTAL ASSESW ENT TO DISTRICT $230,042.65 The final assessment roll is submitted at this time and the date of December 16, 1974 is recommended for hearing on this roll. Very truly yours, Warren C. Gonnason, P.E. Public Works Director MHT:sn h � 1 Y k E r G it t PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE REPORT NOVEMBER 13, 1974 ----------------------------------------------------------------- r The Public Works Committee concurs with the Department of Public Works' recommendation to reject all bids received for the install- ation of waste receptors in the CBD area and recommends the City cf Renton forces perform the work. ------------------------------------------------------------------- Kenneth Bruce, Chairman William Grant Henry Schellert L.I.D. 285 CHRONOLOGY 1. Petition Submitted April 16, 1971 2. Public Works Committee Recommends Creation of L.I.D. February 28, 1974 3. Resolution Creating L.I.D. March 4, 1974 4. Public Hearing on Preliminary Assessment Roll April 8, 1974 5. ')rdinance-Prepared Creating L.I.D. April 15, 1974 6. Call for Bid (273) February 7, 1974 7. Aw&rd Contract April 22, 1974 S. Completed Contract September 30, 1974 9. Final Hearing on Final Assessment , Roll December 1C, 1974 10. Accept Final Assessment �I i , b ,z SHILLLAN, PAIN, & SWANSON GERARD M. SHELLAN ATTORNEYS AT LAW TELEPHONES JOHN K. PAIN, JR. IOD SOUTH SECOND STREET BUILDING ALVfnC 5-6671 ARTHUR D. SWANSON POST OFFICE BOX AIA AIPn<51A74 J. ROBERT WALKER PENTON. WASHINGTON 9RDS5 June17 , 1974 Mrs . Gwen Marshall Finance Director Renton Municipal Building Renton, Washington 98055 PLEASE DETACH AND RETURN WITH YOUR CHECK AMOUNT ENCLOSED — Re: Legal Services rendered for LID 285 (April 1974) (Constructors - PAMCO vs . City of Renton, et al) Including various consultathns, correspondence, negotiations, preparation of affidavits , Motion to Dissolve Temporary Restraining Order, Order Dismissing+Dissolving Temporary Restraining Order and Order to Show Cause, court appearances, arguments, etc. $385 .00 CHAR 1 LR 116. LAWS OF 1965 CITY OF RENTON CERTIFICATION 1, THE unnF r .Pt' nn r 1 H: ��fly CI Ia HY ONo(R Yf nAI IY r . v. ll:, nI ulAt.. HAYF b[rM1 r ur 1 -I.. „I�.r nA IHI. IA"" 1 n U A` a V P 1.4,AHo IHAT TMF cI AIM IS n 111 .I. -u. nmU UII VAI0 Ob I I LAT ION Ab nln'.1 IlII lI. .I JII. ANO THAT 1 AM OD u AI .n LFD To AUi.L.I,CAy AND .:LNrIIY TO SAIL` t' •%1 7 / SIGHT D: .� ,0N 21 1g1� PUB��G WO��N ONT i I 1 � I } M S REC, E,VED October 2, 1974 ODI 4 1y14 INTER-)FFICE MEMO M TO: Gerard Shellan, City Attorney rr� FROM: Mounir Touma, Office Engineer f' SUBJECT: L. I .D. No. 285 - Orillia Sanitary Sewer FINAL COSTS ARE NOW BEING COMPILED FOR L. I .D. NO. 285 Please list below any costs your office may have incurred or may incur on this pr-ject, and return the original of this form to the Engineering Department at your earliest conven,ence. Thank you for your cooperation ir. this matter. Attorney's Fees Bond Counsel City Attorney y `—`— Contract Engineering Franchises Inspection Fees Permits Other City Clerk City Treasurer's Costs Mailing Interest on Warrants Other -- Street Department Utilities Department Other Costs TOTAL $ F r October 2, 1974 t i A INTER-IFFICE MEMO TO: City Clerk FROM: Tom Touma, Office Engineer SUBJECT : L. I . D. No. 285 - Orillia Sanitary Sewer i^ FINAL COSTS ARE NOW BEING COMPILED FOR L. I .D. NO. 285 Please list below any costs your office may have incurred or may incur on this project, and return the original of this form to the Engineering Department at your earliest convenience , Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. Attorney's Fees $ Bond Counsel $700.00 City Attorney Contract Engineering Franchises Inspection Fees Permits Other City Clerk $1,K4.13 City Treasurer's Costs Mai 1 i,ig Interest on Warrants Other '— Street Department Utilities Department Other Costs i TOTAL S R October 2, 1974 n a INTER-JFFICE MEMO TO: Vic TeGantvoort, Street Superintendent FROM: Mounir Touma, Office Engineer SUBJECT: L. I .D. No. 285 - Orillia Sanitary Sewer FINAL COSTS ARE NOW BEING COMPILED FOR L. I . D. NO. 285 Please list below any costs your office may have incurred or may incur on this project, and return the original of this form to the Engineering Department at your earliest convenience. Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. Attorney's Fees $ Bond Counsel City Attorney Contract Engineering Franchises Inspection Fees ` Permi is Other City Clerk Cite Treasurer's Costs Mailing Interest on Warrants Other " — — Street Department No Jhnr: t; Utilities Department Other Costs TOTAL $ y� 'IT/Am 10-4_74 I _ _ I f IIIr, /-77Y ji- - 14. +�11 I to I I u mmV I1 �I TAm f.t . 11! 14 15 19 19 t � 1 l f V �. z1 21 zz � I -- — — _ I l sz 23 24 li � 1 z, zs zs 26 _ r27 I i s 1 f j, f ' z® 30 .. tttttt °I 32 a1 ( 34 1 1 34 r ] 1 1 36 r� 36 ll3940 40 , ''"{ i III, I11 �.m rla� � �Ilur at_ 10/29 19 74— Ne c City of Renton • Public Works Department a a•rs: C/O Del Bennett --_ - - —'- — `— — i 2000 LID Procedures B,ochure 169 00 Tax 5 07 i I I - - Total 1 174 -07 i I � 1 CUSTOMEN'S OROEa NO KEEP THIS SLIP FOR REFERENCE . lel October 2, 1974 INTER-)FFICE MEMO TO: Gwen Marshall, Finance Department FROM: Tom Touma, Office Engineer SUBJECT : L. I .D. No. 285 - Orilli> Sanitary Sewer FINAL COSTS ARE NOW BEING LOMPILED FOR L. I . D. NO. 285 Please list below any costs your office may have incurred or may incur on this project, and return the original of this form to the Engineering Department at your earliest convenience. Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. Attorney's Fees $ Bond Counsel City Attorney Contract Engineering Franchises Inspection Fees — Permits Other City Clerk City Treasurer's Costs Mailing $35.00 _ Interest on Warrants S2.900.89 Other _ —"T.;00— Legal�Adv"-- Street Department Util ; ties Department Other Costs TOTAL $ 2�9R0-. R9 .5 'r DATE TIME KEN BY L, - - 1 FOR &� WHILE YOU WERE OUT OF TELEPHONE NO. ❑ TELEPHONED Cl PLEASE CALL ❑ CALLED TO SEE YOU ❑ WILL CALL AGAli. ❑ WANTS TO SEE YOU ❑ RETURNED YOUR CALL MESSAGE 5 MEMORANDUM t TO- Lyman Houk April 16, 1974 FROM: Ted Bennett SUBJECT: LID 273 d 285 According to the City Council• minutes of April 8, LID 273 was dissolved on March 4, 1974 and LID 285 was Initiated, This Is to advise you that interim financing of LID 273 was provided by the Firemen's Pension Fund and Revenue Warrants In the amount of $250.80 have been previously issued. This amount plus Interest In the amount of $40.26 for a total of $291 .06 must be Included in the total assessment roll of LID 285. The Interest was computed through June 30, 1974 and if It should go beyond that date additional Interest of $0.04 per day must be added. .1 I � r tic .4 ic9G ds r � • U� 'r cc: warren Gonnason Gwen Marshall _ j' • " *r>S / DATE_ September 27, 1974 1 f TO; GWEN MARSHALL, FINANCE DIRECTOR FROM: WARREN C. GONNASON, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS (2) SUBJECT: Estimate No. FINAL Contract No. CAG 012-74 1 Project: Orillia Sanitary Sewer Project - LID 285 A -------------------------------------------------- Submitted herewith and recommended :or payment is Estimate N3. FINAL (2) for work performed by__Frank Colucc io Construction Co. Amount previously paid Contr c $ 125,039.74 _ $ 13,893.30 Amount previously retained — $ ' Amount retained this estimate 1,574.64 1 (to be allocated from the following accounts:) L.I.D. 285 ( ) $ 1,574.64 ( ) $ Amount Due Contractor This Estimate $ 68.851.27 GRAND TOTAL $ 2ng,358.95 The amount due the Contractor this Estimate is $ 68,851.27 , which is to be paid from the following accounts: ► L.Z.D. 285 ( ) $ 68,851.27 CHARTER 116, LAW$ OF 19b* CITY OF RENTON CERTIFICATION I, THE UNDERSIGNED DO M[NEDV clay", GNOFN ►[NALTT Of PERJURY- THAT THE MAT[NIALS MAVI SEEN FURNMMED. THE D[NVICEJ A[NO[RAD DOE I,[FORMED At D[ECNID[O MEE[IN.AND TMHAI AI Vl C[AIY iD A JUST. DUE 10 UNPAID ODEIGATIOM AD AINST IN CI IT O! I TON. AND THAT 1 AM AYTMONIEED TO AVTM[ CAT[ AND CENTIF' TO SAID V7.;pmp SIGHED, ,V \ t W-AR � F "., GAG 01? -t !.L'L i._cry'S 9_21- . : am 'i; _i 11 imE1bB _„ Il5 000.011 i,i.. 90% 13,500.00 lie 15,0�0.00 l00i 15,000.0 _._.. _._ ._... Feld Grubbt� 1•`'• �+� U0 1•+ 40% 200.00 h0i 300.00 100s 50a.00 n..e. HIK, atd Batkli C.Y. ^�,02 10.400 5000 _ _1.00 OJ _1356.96 2_7_._13 _6356.96 127.13 .__,.__.._.._..__.. 4. VoUb"tlem Material - Ballast r,w, 0.02 1 000 1708.06 34.16 1114.20 N -_22.28 2822.26 56.44 BeddiM Gravel (PHA) bet _ o.07 2.000 1013.39 _ 2_0.27 833.09 16.66 1846.48 36.93 _b S�l41at SeeeWl Rtekfill -•-cw Y.-�---_ tr,n2 SAW 1914.70_ 38.29 137.99 W_- 2.75 -2052.69 �. 41.04 -7. SW. 41r, SAM. N.H. ._........__,�.+.�A__._,700^F� 16 . 114 7_700.00 - 6 4,200.00 17 11,900.00 . B„•_�. Met'Et1ZV.N. ^i^ Fui_...__ 900.00 1 1 900.00.�.---..Y._... . ----- �- 1 9Uo.o0 9 10" luctile I1om Pipe F. $7.30 SSO 328 1,234.40 --- ----- 328 12,234.40 10, Delete. �_ ._.�..._..._.-.__._.._.._ _-._..-._ ". 18" Steel i:tlLm .bared L.r', W.00 329 328 26,240.00 328 26,240.00 t3. Ampi,At Patchi Tom 6a,00 -B - _ .� -- --_ �12 720.00 12 720.00 i?. CraoAed Sarlscite Tam i6 00 19 --- --- ----- _-- -- _ !o. --- a T.Y. Ipo. Msinllw L S 1yS30.OD i..l. --- --- lU _ 1,350.00 100 1,350.D0 8.1 r kwtil* lrsa Pipe L.P. _ 24.00e 2,118� -- _--- 2211 53,064.00 2211 53,064.00 1 B•3 10" 0attile Irma ►iw L.F. SS.Ob . 1_71s^ a019.50 70 x743.09 113 3,958.39 2132.50 74,701.48 t s 61, D.I. Tee _ as. 96.00 21 -- ---- 20 1720.00 20 1,720.00 :00 br-- E15.00 11 _ 2-_� 230.00 Ju tot*t w �198,821.42 1 S.1% State Sales Tar -__ 10,5377.53 Total To Date Am maj Previously P*14 CagEractor yis.o39.74 7 Moeast Provieaoly t4wrAd Retain Ris Estimate Amount Bus Cestraetirt This Estimate i i t t k r Ff • September 19, 1974 b City of Renton 404 Municipal Bui !dina 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Was�ington 98055 Atter"on Mr. Warren C. Connason, P.E. and Mr. 4ary Case SUBJECT: SANITARY SEWERS, 110 285 Gentlemen: The referenced project received In this office on ,epiember 17, 1974, cannot he approved. . The plans for the referenced porject were not approved by the Depart- ment of Ecology before construction began in accordance with Chapter 90.48.110, Revised Code of Washington. -- We have no objections to the design of this project and so, we will file these final plans unapproved. I hope thaT future projects can be coordinated and resolved more efficiently prior to construction as per RCW 90.48.110. Very truly yours, GARY L. BRUGGER Plan Review Er-ineer Environmental ;uallty GLB:mk cc: Dept. of Social and Health Serv;ces, Seattle King County Health Depl-. Ted Trepanier, D.O.E., N.W. Regional Office i 1a h iv ti �f w�if� J �' ] Y [JM'FI('F:Y)F Tfi P:PITY ATTV RDiFa" • EtMYTU9,q'pyHiVG'COY al7wtrW� I � y POST OFFICE BOX 626, 100 Iry9 AVENUE BWlO1N6. REN(ON, WASNINCTON 9lOSS Al FIN 5•678 p� 1 'IY C&R•NY M. &HILL". Gtr ATTORItl Qf, �+ JOHN N.VA/N. JR.. ASSIS 1441 C,II Al'(1FNEY � SEVSE�'s September 13. 1974 r Seattle :Mortgage Main Office: Arcade Plaza Second & University Seattle, Washington 93101 Attn: Pfs. Jean Bell r Pe; Steve J. Dearla;ar, et ux, Contract Seller 17100 Slock, ;lest Valley :;igaway Benton, Washin3ton Real Estate Taff Account do. 232304-9020-49 Dear :"s. Bell: r Mr. Dick Hour^tc.), L;« City's Utilities Er-;�neer, turned over co our offiep your Lette_ of S>.ptember 9, 1974 toget:,er with attach- ments. Pleasa be advised that LID 235 is a successor to LID 273 and there f: would only be oae is essment and not t o as listed. LID 235 was commenced with revised boundaries from chose described in LID 273 and also a change in the proposed improvements. You night want i to bring this to the attention of the Title Company. The City will noc, as a rattir of policy and law, subordinate tacos or assessments a;air t resl pro-erty to a subsequent mortgage. We are not certain why you maintain that a full cash payment has to be rade Por the 4ota1 assessment of LID 233 at this time since the parties. as .atween themselves, can provide for the assumption f oz. t;'ie LID assessnent and :sake the annual payaerta as provided by lam. If you have any farther gaestion in this natter, please advise. We remain V=ry t*uly yours, ' �ky Shellaa 0 cMs:bjm f d 4 t ' F y M ` 1 11 A J April 8, 1074 -,1 honorable Avery Garrett, Mayor Members of the City Council RL: Local Improvement District No. 28a S.W. 43rd Sanitary Sever (Orillia) ,,ent lemer.: The following engineer's report is submitted for L.I.D, 285. _. The total estimated cost, including engineering, taxes legal service3 and L.I.D. costs is $247,925.28. The valuation of the property within the proposed district plus 25% of the existing improvements is $7P6 x55.00, adequate to support the proposed district.kere is also an assessment against these properties for LID 769, a Water Local Improvement District in the amount of $85,667.84, 4 3. The City, as of 5:00 o'clock P.M. P.D.'r. has received 3 written 9! protests against the L.I.D. These protests represent 21.36 percent of the estimated cost of the Local Improvements fiict. i; Yours very truly, Warren L. Gonnason, P.L. GEc:mj Public e'orks Director yF SAFECO INSURANCE C061PANN OF AMERICA + ' GENERAL INEURANCF -`MPANV OF AMEWCAY�& �- �t�e �/7� FIRST NATIONAL INSL vCE COMPANY OF AQfIL' N I conk n,m, __rK§0 C010o010 Construction fAtpsmy_ __._ ? Add,ess Seatt�. YaaYfaeean 2441720 �rc.m.d ti•Y•�• '� OrWia'Saii" savers Vicinity of S. V. 6rd Street and P In•lude IpcP,io� i. and o.ne,'s goat Pa11q YiRNFa) Sebedn1M I ad III City Engineer c.,m,o;I 2",oq.70_ City of Renton 206e06i•7O City Hall _ RestoO, Hashinten 90055 an... a 4130/74 With.., pnjvdainq you, nghl or pffechng an LdbJny vndu ov, bond(,) described doo.e, ... ..ovid ppp,.,,o,e such oFrb bllowmq lnbrmdllpn oa+s noW owddble. SAFECO INSURANCE COMPANIES Approxlmoie dole -- I. IF CONTRACT COMPLETED of wmplexon and/a pp PLEASE STATE__Yj.dtz._ dmepronce .SLPT �7 �%fie/ F,npl w.Ima P„ce ie� -L�A�� 9S 2. IF CONTRACT UNCOMPLETED App,ocimoh p.rucloge o, dolbr omevm of PLEASE STATE_____ contron completed o, dei,..," I P,oboblP dole of cnmplellon II��''77 Totpl_ i 3. Are,he:.:ot,y tloms ossrynmems nop noocas or hens on hk? <_J Ye ((��yys L7 No i A, Remarks(if dnYj ti RETAIN THIS COPY I Y 4 t: 1 i1 Frank Coluccio Construction Company, Inc. C SEWERS - WATERMAINS • UTILITIES 4 R` 9600 EMPIRE WAY SOUTH SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98118 (206) 722-5306 October 31, 1974 City of Renton Department of Public Utilities City Hall Renton, Washington Gentlemen: Transmitted herewith is certified Aftidavit of Wages Paid with reference to the Citv of Renton Sanitary Sewer Project, LID 285 (Ori111a). t Very truly yours, FRANK COLUCCIO CONSTRUCTION CO. Office Manager. awr encl. p I F r t r• al nvk.v -.4Yr�N STATE: OF WASHINGTON ' DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRIES AFFIDAVIT OF WAGES PAID On Public Works Contract Al:,ncs Citv of Huttcni t' nlI,,,t Nulalgr CAG012-74 l talc e'av r:,,r .1,e.u.lr•,I 4/22/74 I t .. rl.nl rasa e'.u.ld �„I 9/27/74 1•. u,r m Paurh l5' •:I. I' rtunr" King t"t'nt- Renton-Orillia STATE: OF WASHINGTON 11 a, It r,l ild, W Yc'g hn COUNTY OF King In compliantc with RCW 39.12.040 1, the undersigned, being it duly authorized represent live of Frank Coluccio Construction Co., Contractor, 9600 Empire Way So., Seattle, Wash. 98118 IeuMmch,r nr 5abcanlrncOil %,,v do herobv mullify that the fl,%,wlm1 raty, of loud, ,,.pro 1,11 b�nui, Iluiyc I" Itdlt> h.n 1 i, laud to the Iaboreri,. workmen :and meehdruc, en'ndocrd h" rne iv„ ll tl�r de:a rlho,I ;,b,n'v .vul thst I laborel. norknian nt niechanrc ha, Irud IQ,, th.u. the, 'I.r.,,,i.hra r.ne of ,we.iv Induv- it,. 1 Sintlslician of the Department of Labor :rod Daht,tric. r : bvlow each (lo"IlicA loll of hdror rmplural by tau uprm the proem dvS'n rvd ake'. and file rate of hourh pat. and hourly fringe bone:iu, 1,od b. ca(h ci;iv.rGcntuni. hi addition. it .rpinrnrrcc. lm%e been em- ploved, list their wall. sari ,I- refs ill r:,uon :uorl their sage' of .d,.incemer d. Classification of Labor Rate of Rate of Hourly Ilourly P.1N. Fringe Benefits Paid Shovel Operator - 111 yd. 9.28, 1.37- Backhoe Operator - 60 hp 9.06- 1.37- Dozer Operator - under D9 8.88- 1.37-- Loader Operator - 21g yd. 9.28- 1.37-- Oiler 8.42- 1.37- Laborer 6.85� 1.28"' Pipelayer 7.15- 1.28- Plumber 9.101= 2.40� Truck Driver - 10 yd. 8.W- 1.55� Nott: Attach Additional Sheets ea Needed. -FRAI%, COOLUCCIO CONSTRUCTION CO. fC p,{Natna)By Subscribed and sworn to before me . r � Me.) this. . 2 5 t h .. .day of. ..____.Or tom,._.___, hereby certify that aodordtog to the wage i+ea and frtae benotito Igor: in ,worn to y 19, 74. is prevailing wage requirecients of RCN / y : 1.12.040 have been satisfied Public.f.�`Y.4•.s..t... .. .. �. :....:.._ -. WM. C. JACOHS, DIR3uTO Narat7 ryinaMfortheSlide ofWashington, DIiRARTMERT OF LABJR k INDUSTRIES residing in Washington, 'Pala apace reserved for Director's certi9eation INSTRUCTIONS: 1. Pursuant to RCW 39.12,040 copies of this form must be completeti by the contractor and each of his Sub- contractors- 2. Complete this rnrm in trgdicide anti havo it ii0arin,c]. 3, Submit all forms fin cortiflcotlon to IndwAl"d Rcialiolr: Ihvesoel, Dvp ltilivnt of 1. and Induntrm:.. General Administration Building, Olympia. Washington 9HYA. 4. File a certified copy with the Awarding Agency. CONTRACTORS ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING AND FILING. AFFIPAVITS of the SUB- CONTRACTORS. This is required by law and Lxivments van not lawfully ho male onlil such a1lLlat its are filed. STATE OF WASHINGTON DF.I tkRTd1ENT OF LABOR AND INItt'ST...4a STATEMENT OF INTENT TO PAY PHI'%'AII,INC �'ACFS ON PUBLIC VIORKS CONTRACr 9w arhnN Agenry City Of Renton t ' y, Cmvrnct Nmnbc,' CAGO12-74 - t. * t)uty t'outl;,rt A,-A-i 4/22/74 4 c...... �,rk Pnrinr 1,1oi King ! '. Int;rtun Wtihm C.,,.nb Renton-Or tllia rr:Ra comr:.cinr Frank C.,l _to Construction Company STATE OF WnstuNcI'ou 1 t }FS County of King r I In corn;dis nee with Chapter :19,12 RCW. 1. the undersigned. be❑ n doh. authonred representative of I Frank Coluccio Construction Companv, 9600 Empin ,Jay South, Seattle, we. 98118 fi 6+-,t•:w! r ar SULroNr'r.e:r, 1Cnrex. f do hereby certify that In connection with the performance of v „n t! - public works project above de>enbed commencing 7/11/74 , 19 the f,,Ilo%ing rates per hour for each classification of laborers workmen and mechanic will :n' paid ;col no laborer. workman or mechanic so employed upon such work will be paid less than the prevailing rle of wage as determined by the Department of Lahor and Industries as specified in the principal contract. RATE (;F RATF OF CL.AFSIFIC ATION OF LABOR 110UHLY 'A)' FRINGE RF.\F.FITS Shovel Operator - 1-yd. 8.38 1.20 Rackhoe Operator - 60 Imp 8.16 1.20 Loader Operator - 3-yd. 8.38 1.20 Dozer Operator - under D9 8.00 1.20 Oiler 7.52 1.20 Pipelayer 6.10 1.25 Laborer 5.80 1.25 Truck Driver - 10-yd. 7.66 1.78 NOTE: Attach Addihunal Shccla as Needed FRANK COLUCCIO CONSTRUCTION CO%TANY 1 �y/q rr, yat $y A,am,raea reorraamm„�, Pres. Subscribed and sworn to before me this 15th . day of July ,. __.... 19 74 Notary'Pethlic in and for the State of Waahingtoa, residing is wnshiagtort. The purpose of this statement is to provide evidence of intent to comply with the prevailing wage requirements of Chapter 39.12 RCW. IT IS A PRELIMINARY FILING ONLY and cannot be construed as application for certification by the Director of Labor and Industries that the prevailing wage requirements as set forth in RCW 39.12.040 have been satisfied. THE ABOVE STATEMENT OF INTENT TO PAY PREVAILING WAGES IS All D This space reserved for Director's approval "� De Rent of bor A Tndustree s itelB.ya 1 1.7 .<4— ? BEFORE FINAL SETTLEMENT CAN BE MADE in c ecC with anv ubhc works project it wIII a; Ebe necessary for the contractor, and any subcontracto to produce evidence of certification by the r Director that prevailing wages including fringe benefits have heen paid to each classification of laborers. workmen or mechanics employed on said project. Form S. F. 9f43 "Affidavit of Wages Paid", or a similarly constructed form should be submitted for the Director's certification. Phese forms are available upon request from any office of the Department of Labor and Industres. PROGRESS PAYMENTS: Each voucher claim submitted to an owner by a contractor for payment tr; on a project estimate shall state that prevailing wages have been paid in accordance with the pre-filed - statement or Statements of intent on file with the Department of Labor and Industries as approved by the Industrial Statistician. COMFLF.TF. AND MAIL ENTIRE SET FOR APPROVAL TO. Industrial Relations Division, Department of Labor and Industries, General Administration Building, Olympia. Waashington 98501 CONTRALTOHS. DISTRIBUTE APPROVED HTATF.MFNTs As FOL.LON'S' ,PINK COPVr URIGINA1,AWARDINo Al.FNCV OLCE COPY, UCPLICATE—PRIME CONTRACTOR YFLL(IW(OPY1 THIW.Ie'4'rE:EUBCUNTRA(Tlgl i GREEN Mill I in AUXUWaCATE--INOUHTRIAL. STA•risTIVIAN tlletalned by Dr,,vtlnrnU t I Y: T.1 4, Y MEN S vvl� Y Frank Coluccio Constructioa Company, Inc. SEWERS • WATERMAINS • UTILITIES fpq� t 9600 EMPIRE WAY SOUTH i SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98118 (206) 722.5306 ETA 6 r S �. :r. July 22, 1974 City of Renton Department of Public Works City Hall Renton, Wash. 98055 Attention: R. Lyman Houk Off Jce Engineer Gentlemen: Herewith please find certified copy of the t: Affidavit of Intent to Pay Prevailing Wages on the Renton- Orillia Sanitary Sewer Project (L.I.D. 285). Very truly yours, 1 PRANK COLUCCIO CONSTRUCTION COMPANY Office Manager. awr encl. t tt p JUL 231914 PUB1 lC V i, Uc PT CIIV C' ON 1 n t� r !r h- i, °1 �y x 3 Frank Coluccio Construction Company, Inc. r SEWERS • WATERMAINS • UTILITIES - 9600 EMPIRE WAY SOUTH SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98118 (206) 722-5306 August 21, 1974 City of Renton Department of Engineering �1f1115 re�'J City Hall KW 2E laa Renton, Washington 98055 PUBIC '11JWN" r9r.PT` Attention: Tom Touma CITY W Gentlemen: r In re: Orillia Sanitary Sewer Project L.I.D. No. 285 Per your request, following Is our quotation For extra work on the above project: 1. 81, PVC 912 l.f. @ $39.00 = $35,568.00 2. 8"x6" Tee and Plugs 13 each @ 39.00 = 507.00 3. 6" Side Sewer 130 l.f. @ 33.00 4,290.00 4. Banholes 3 each @ 700.00 - 2,1u0.00 5. Asphalt 5 ton @ 60.00 300.U0 6. Crushed rock 50 ton @ 10.00 500.00 " 7. TV Inspection 912 l.f. @ 0.30 213.60 °p $43,538.00 i Plus Washington State Sales Tax 2,307.55 "E $45,846.15 Very truly yours, FRANK COLUCCIO CONSTRUCTION CO. President. FC/awr )3 1 q� � J y y II 1}t 'I'I I K,'19'Y ATTOHNF:,' • RF.NTON G %',%VAN1J1NT0 } E 0 InF ICE BOX 626. 100 TNO AVENUE BUn DING AENTON WASHINGTON 48055 AIOINE 59678 I'OQ W GLNMIO'a. ENELLAN, (,, • >i 1,1R1I, 4 Q JOHN R PAIN. JR., AI�.:-'nq :. AIIU4N1I _ FD SEPtE L•ke(I icKelvy, 1,iII i.vansor i Betts Attorneys at :.aa L12C Gorton building :;Cattle, 1At6ehington Attention: Mr. Joan P. Snielin Re: Bids for 1..0ca: Improvement district 0205 L.tar Jona: .tuu]d you please advise us regarding; the above captioned case whether your client intenla to -ansae the natter any furtlior or whether it abould be dismissed so as to eliminate furtnCr expense to all the rarties concerned. You will remember that an onler was issued unJer date of April ?:, 1974E dismissing and dissolving the teaporary restraining, order and snow cause proceedings of Plaintiffs. :rusting, to near frog, you at an early iate, we remain Ye)urs very truly, Gerard M. Sheller City Attorney GMSJnf t bc: Aiken, Z�t. Louis g Sil}eg Attn. t".r. Edward L. XWeller f 1 © py 5 r , r 4 r 1 1� ti 1 (^4µ 1 � !j d 1 � Late July 1, 1974 i To: Tom Fouma, Acting Office Engineer FROM: Gary Case SUBJECT: LID 285 Mr. Sternoff cams to the office Friday morning concerned about the increased costs and alignment problem caused by Metro manhole connection. I proposed returning to the original alignment to eliminate all extra costs, but Mr. Sternoff felt that this would "Mickey Mouse" his property development by having a road that would not bisect his property. tie now proposes a further realignment from existing Metro manhole, paralleling new alignment and ending approximately 70 feet southerly on Jonientz property. He feels that perhaps if Jonientz realizes the increase in price would also effect his property, an easement would be granted. (See sketch for further explanation.) In a telephone conversation later. I told Mr. Sternoff that we would set up an appointment with you, Warren, Frank Coluccio, Elmer, Mr. Jonientz, Mr. Sternoff, and myself for this week to discuss all the details and come to a further understanding and get this project started. r Mr. Sternoff is very upset and may possibly revoke his easement and prevent construction. He so intimated in telephone conversation. C . Would you arrange an appointment time that would be convenient for all parties con-erned as soon as possible to resolve this conflict. Frank Coluccio called Friday morning also and quoted the increase over unit bid prices as follows: p 1. North of street as designed - approximatcl•v $17,900.00 2• In street (alternate) - approximately $33,262.00 3. in back property line - approximately $2,800.00 I i 1 • ao•MY.:11 k.aKRY#IYlei�� I * 1 •ia•i.ya9):. Y i Memo to Tom Touma Page 2 July 1, 1974 • I feel that the property owners should be aware that this will be ductile iron and can be built over. Frank wants to have the meeting as early as possible so that the survey crew can stake and construction can begin on schedule. Gary E. Case GEC:ad t f LID 'N; .rH tLLIO ;'.51!4R 1' .,I Ii LI< 1 Preconst rust ion L.ontvirncc y Held in the 4th floor tonforeace room, Renton '4unicipal Building, at <:C)o p.m. on .June 27, 1974. Doug Damn of Washington Natural Gas Cu. rcquestod a set of revised pltns. The contractor, Frank Coluccio, mentioned the deletion of one section •,f steel casing and the realignment of pipe from qi 1 to 41 6 as well as tic addition of sewer in S.W. a3rd St , West of the: railroad tracks. Doug Dam stated that there are only two gas services an the North side of S.W. 43rd, Nest of the railroad tracks ind that the gas main runs on the south sides of S.W. 43rd St. The contractor plans to start digging and laying pipe on July 8th. Les Phillips asked about staking and will get together with the contractor. Vic TeGantvoort made the contractor aware that flagmen would be required durinr *ae work on S.W. 43rd St. The rr stated that tLe hours of work would probably be 7:00 a.m. to 3:30 ,,. .vertime pay for inspection was brought up and Vince Lee and Tom Touma tail investigate this. Tom 'romp directed Elmer Shaver to send revised copies of plans to Puget Power and Pacific Northwest Bell, who were not present, as well as City of Renton Police and fire Department. Vince Lee discussed Et0 form which, the contractor will Le required to file periodically with the City. The time of submittal was mentioned and the minimum percentage of minority workers ❑llowed according to the City of Renton affirmative action program. John Trich of Olympic Pipe Line Co. requested notifi.ation prior to any excavation near his lines. The majority of those people present were dismissed and only the contractor and engineering personnel remained to discuss the obvious changes in the plan since the time the project wee bid. Elmer Shaver 4' r. r MINUILS OF Pki INU Pre construct ion mectIng I-, I jU 1,9- '�Rnitjr� in the fourth floor confe,once room "a' hold On 71111c 27, 1974, Oln at Renton hall, Renton, Washirigton• ten,lance lephune Limer Shaver City of Renton, Lngr. 235-26 31 Victor leGant )rt City of Renton, Street Les Phillips City235-�641 of Renton, Engr. 235-2631 Douglas Damm Washington %dtural GO, 622 67 ' x 250 Martin Lundy City '35 of -tcnton, Engr. , -2631 Matt Kohl Frank Coluce City Of Renton, Water 235-2646 io Frank Coluc, In 722-.;30(, Luoert W. Plihich Construction Co. of Renton, Water 235-2646 J. A. Trich Olympic Pipe Line Co. 226-8880 A. J. Rowe City Of Renton, Water 235-2646 Vince Lee City of Renton, Engr. 235-2635 Ron Olson Lity, of Renton, Utilities 235-2631 row 'roam.' City Of Renton, Engr. 235-2631 We have briefly v reviewed the project and discussed procedures regarding install- ation of a sanitary line in the Orillia area. In view of the redesign proposal of Lll) 295 as related to the original design of LID 273, certain items if proposal problems were discussed with the contractor. The realignment as proposed and the Girvet connection of the sanitary sewer line to the Metro line has imposed a construction problem because of the water table level in that area. An alternate proposal was discussed to set up a metering manhole where originally proposed and connect it to th, Me�r, and set up another manhole, then proceeding north approximatelyo _ianhole a new manhole can be installed to meet where at It 05t. tractor has agreed to do this work the existing alignment. The direct connection to the Metro line and consideration of the water table in the area would force the contractor to install dewatering wells and provide the necessary equipment to accomolish the boring operation. The contr,ctor's proposal to do this connection was estimated at $10,000.0() We have agreed to replace the proposed 18" -ipe casing with 28" casing at no additional cost, because the 28" Pipe casing is available to the contractor. Proposed casing between manhole #5 to manhole #6 will be d: 1:ted from the contract because it was felt that it is not needed. We have discnsr,,d the installation of the sewer line on SW 43 6treet. It was discovered that ore is no sufficient clearance between the existing 12" 8" concrete sewer pipe. The City has main and the pro}--sed alignment Of water agreed to survey and -Ossiblv local( the water line and wridurground Outlets to r' F b �I 1 Fr p Page 2 Minutes of Preconstruction Meeting .Tu7e 27, 1974 n verify the feasibility of in.sta ll ation of the sever pipe and maintaining the t necessary clearance as required by the State law The contractor conunented that this additional work will cost the City M wj a linear foot to perform the installation of tilt. pipe on SW 43rd. We have agreed to rcvie,+ his proposal and respond to it as soon as possible. 4 �• I 0llllir il. Touma, P.E. MHT:ad A l f C t a I i- . September 19, 1974 i h .I �,gill � ili City of Renton Municipal Building 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 Attention Mr. Warren C. Gonnason, P.E. and Mr. Gary Case II SUBJECT: SANITARY SEWERS, LID 285 Gentlemen: The referenced project nr: eived in this office on September 17, 1974, s cannot be approved. ! The plans for the referenced porject were not approved by the Depart- ment of Ecology before construction began In accordance with Chapter 90.48. 110, Revised Code of Washington. We have no objections to the design of rhls project and so, we will file these final plans unapproved. I hope that future projects can be coordinated and resolved more efficiently prior to construction as per RCW 90.48.110. Very truly yours, GARY L. BRUGGER Plat, Review Engineer Environmental Quality GLB:mk cc: Dept. of Social and Heal+h Services, Seattle King County Health Dept. Ted Trepanier, D.O.E. , N.W. Regional Office Y l c V 7 OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY 0 RENTON.NVASIIINGTO V L O POST OFFICE BOX 626. 100 2NO AVENUE BUILDING. RENTON. WASHINGTON 9BOSS ALPINE 5,9678 m=R c a (O G[RARO IN. 6N6LLAN, CITY ATTORNEY JONN N. PAIN. JN., ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY September 13, 1974 �4rfDSEPtEWO i I Seattle Mortgage Main Office: Arcade Plaza Second & University Seattle, Washigton 93101 Attn: Dts. Jean Bell Re : Steve J. Dearinger, et ux, Contract Seller 17100 Block, West Valley highway Renton, Washington Real estate Ta:: Account 0o. 252304-9020-49 Dear Ms. Bell: Mr. Dick Houghton, the City's Utilities Enineer, turned over to our office your letter of September 9, 1974 toget':er with attach- ments. Please be advised that LID 235 is a successor to LID 273 and there would only he one assessment and not two as listed. LID 235 was commenced with revised boundaries from those described in LID 273 and also a change in t..e proposed improve.menta. You mi.-at want to }bring this to the attention of the Title Company. The City will not, as a matter of policy and law, subordinate ta::es or assessments against real property to a subsequent mortgage. We are not certain why you maintain that a full ca.;h payment has to ba wade for tae total assessment of LID 235 at this time since the parties, as between enemselves, can provide for the assumption of the LID assessment and make the annual paymen;_3 as provided by law. If you have any farther question in this *tatter, please advise. We remain Vsry t*uly pours , Gztard a. Shellaa GtiS:bjn » I April 8, 1974 honorable Avery Garrett, Mayor Members of the City Council RG: Local improvement District No. 285 S.W. 43rd Sanitary Sewer (Urillia) Gentlemen: The followinc, engineer's report is submitted for L.I.U. 28.). 1. The total estimated cost, including engineering, taxes legal services and L.I.D. costs is $247,925.28. 2. The valuation of the property within the proposed district plus 25% of the existing improvements is j'96,83 ',.00, adequate to support the proposed distric:y�6eia is also an assessment against these properties for LI 25% a Water Local Improvement District in the amount of j85,667.84. 3. The City, as of 5:00 o'clock P.M. P.U.'I. has recoived 3 written protests against the L.I.D. These protests represent 21.36 percent of the estimated cost of the Local Improvement District. Yours very truly, Warren C. Gonnason, P.L. GCC:m, Pudic Aorks Director I ' I SAFECO INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA s / \ GENERAL INSURANCE -`MPANY OF AMERICq� � ��� FIRST NATIONAL INSL JCE COMPANY OF AIPIEATCA ( HOML OFFICE dld]BRIX:Ai r� I 'vASHI%fIT•,nro>> F,,.n. a _r,:..rory, Cov— its •.. (�� Cantlaclal: ft� Colrcai! COaatL9Gtl= CA'JlIlIlly— _Do" ` Address. s till. iiaaltinatoa _ Bond Number 2"1720 Descript,-'"": ......L'l.b.. 195 Orilli'i.>laett rj 94*0" .Vicieii ..elf" O. Ard street and of Contract- Include location and owners Vwt Walley YisWty schadebw I and III contract number i Contract nu<v S 2Me063.70 City Engineer - City of Renton Pondlsl5 208,063.70 City Hall Renton, Washington 98055 Owner: _.. _ EHectl.e date 4/30/74 Without prejudicing your right or affecting our liability under our bond(s) described above, we would appreciate Very truly Yours, ..ch of the following information as is now avudoble. SAFECO INSURANCE COMPANIES APproumale date I. IF CONTRACT COMPLETED of completion and/or „ p PLEASE STATE �_ _.. acceptance $EP 1 T V.7 /fj'e _Final contract price ���•-�B_!'y { 2. IF CONTRACT UNCOMPLETED Approximate percentage or dollar amount of 1 PLEASE STATE--- contract completed or delivered Sales To• l Probable date of aompletlon Tool I �,y 3. A,e Mere any doims,aaagr rents,stop nonon or bens on file? ❑ L�I Yes No 4. Remarks: (if ony) Date__. .,y S.gnaM RETAIN THIS COPY I Frank Coluccio Construction Company, Inc. SEWERS • WATERMAIN ITILITIES 9600 EMPIRE WAY H SEATTLE, WASHINGT' 118 (206) 722-5306 . October 31, 1974 City of Renton Department. of Public Utilities City Hall Renton, Washington Gentlemen: Transmitted herewith is certified Affidavit of '? .ges Paid with reference to the City of Renton Saiitary Sewer Project, LID 285 (Orillia) . Very truly yours FRANK COLUCCIO CONSTRUCTION CO. Office Manager. awr encl. STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRIES AFFIDAVIT OF WAGES PAID On Public Works Contract l C1.ty of Renton tt Aw irding Agen,y' f Conflict Numbor CAC012-74 D:nc 0,nttac' Atvardod 4/22/74 Ira, C„utract Con+pi"u-il 9/27/74 C,nun%. in Which Wwli I'orf,nn'od King tt,„eat,m within Conmt Renton-Orillia STATE OF WASHINGTON N'as a Slah•nu•nt of brtoul l d, I l es g :Au �SS. COUNTY OF.._..King.................._.._................... In compliance with RCW 39.12.040 I, the undersigned, being e duly authorized representative of Frank Coluccio Construction Co. ,_ Contractor 9600 Empire Way So., Seattle, Wash. 98118 (Contractor or luhcontractor) do hereby certify that the f dl„tring trans of hour 1% t ,rc :in,l huurh' frnige hi refits have 6cen paid to the laborers, workmen and mechanics enipioyed b%. roe upon the project dc-crrhed "hove and that 1 " laborer. workman or mechanic has been pair) leis than the "pr,-%aillnq r.it,, of ;t1,tr" an determined by the Indus- trial Statistician of the Department of Labor kind Inducetries. List below each classification of labor emploved by you spun the project described above and the rate of hourly pay and hourly fringe benefits pawl to ea, h cl;nssrfcation. In addilion, if apprentice, hate been em- ployed, list their names fond or rugist,Mion ntnmbors :m,l their atat;es of adtaucenlent. Classification of Labor Rate of Rate of Ifourh t Hourly Pay Fringe Benefits Paid Shovel Operator - 1'-, yd. 9.28— 1.37- y Backhoe Operator - 60 hp 9.06— 1.37- IS Dozer Operator - under D9 8.88- 1.37-- Loader Operator - 2`i yd. 9.28+ 1.37- Oiler 8.42— 1.37— Laborer 6.85-� 1.28- Pipelayer 7.15 1.28- Plumber 9.01- 2.40� Truck Driver - 10 yd. 8.46� 1.55,' NOTE: Attach Additional Sheets as Needed. -FRAHL CDOLUCCIO CONSTRU^TION. CO. lCpmpap Nama1 B _ (� y � 1 r prnb. Subscribed and sworn to before me i''iu" thia25th._.....day of........_ Oct.____......., hereby certify that according to the wage tte!< and fril.oe benefits hertln sworn to 19....__74, ;o prevailing wage requlret.ren:s of RCW .i2.040 havo been satisfied. WM. C. JACOBS, DIEE%TOR Notary Publ c in and for the State of Washington, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR INDUSTRIES residing in iVashington. This space reserved for Director's certification. INSTR13CTIONS: 1. Pursuant to RCW 39.12.040 copies of this form must be completed by the contractor and each of his sub- contractors. 2• Complete this font in triplic:dn :old have it nolarizotl. :3. Submit all forms for certification to: Indicdri,tl Hel:otioic: Division, Dcpartinenl of I.,ihor ;md Industries. General Administration Building. Olympia. Washington 98504. 4. File a certified copy with the Awarding Agency. CONTRACTORS ARE RFSPONS[BLF. FOR OBTAINING AND FILING AFFIDAVITS of the SUB- CONTRACTORS. This is required by law and payments can not lawfully be made until such affidavits are filed. STATE OF WASHINGTON X' DErARTMENT OF LABOR AND INDUSTr..ES I STATEMENT OF INTENT TO DAY PREVAILING �A"DES " ON Pi'13LIC WORKS CONTRACT Awarding Agency .....City .of Renton ITV Contract Number. _ CAGO12-74 - Date Contract Awarded _4/22/74 County in Which Work Performed .. King... . ........ . Location within County......._ _ Renton-Orillia r Prime Contractor Frank Coluccio. Construction Company. STATE OF WASHINGTON SR. County of._..... .. .King._. ... pIn compliance with Chapter 39.12 RCW, I, the undersigned, being a drily authorized representative of Frank Coluccio Construction Company, 9600 Empire Way South, Seattle, Wa. 98118 'Contractor or Subeontractor) (Addrr,,, t, do hereby certify that in connection with the performance of work on the public works project above described commencing 7./11/74 , 19 . , the following rates per hour for each classification of laborers, workmen and mechanics will be paid and no laborer, workman or a mechanic so employed upon such work gill he paid less than the prevailing rate of wage as determined by the Department of Labor and Industries as specified in the principal contract. RATE OF RATE OF CLASSIFICATION OF LABOR HOURLY PAY FRINGE BENEFITS Shovel Operator - 1-yd. 8.38 1.20 h_ Backhoe Operator - 60 hp 8.16 1.20 Loader Operator - 3-yd. 8.38 ' 1.20 Dozer Operator - under D9 8.00 1.20 t Oiler 7.52 1.20 Pipelayer b.10- 1.25 Laborer 5.80• 1.25 Truck Driver - 10-yd. 7.66 1.28 NOTE: Attach Additional Sheets as Needed FRANR,COLUCCIO CONSTRUCTION COMPANY „ in Na 1 P By.,eT Authorized represmustwe) Pres. Subscribed and sworn to before me this l5th__.,,day of July . 19 74 . ��Gc'.�14 ,'i . t t_ t _ ^-aL _ Notary blic in and for the State of Washington, residing in Washington. The purpose of this statement is to provide evidence of intent to comply with the prevailing wage requirements of Chapter 39.12 RCW. IT IS A PRELIMINARY FILING ONLY and cannot be construed as application for certification by the Director of Labor and Industries that the prevaili, wage requirements as set forth in RCW 39.12.040 hat • been satisfied. THE ABOVE STATEMENT OF INTENT TO PAY PREVAILING WAGES IS I APP D This space reserved for Director's approval De ment of bor h Industrie * S titian BEFORE FINAL SETT .EMENT CAN BE MADE in c ect' (n with an ublic works project it will be necessary for the contractor, and any subcontracto to produce evidence of certification by the Director that prevailing wages including fringe benefits It � e been paid to each classification of laborers, workmen or mechanics employed on said project. Form S. F. 9843 "Atfidavit of Wages Paid", or a similarly constructed form should be submitted for the Director's Certification. These form are available upon request from any office of the Department of Labor and Industries. PROGRESS PAYMENTS: Each voucher claim submitted to an owner by a contractor for payment on a project estimate shall state that prevailing wages have been paid in accordance with the pre-filed statement or statements of intent on file with the Department of Labor and Industries as approved by the Industrial Statistician. COMPLETE AND MAIL ENTIRE SET FOR APPROVAL. TO: Industrial Relations Division, Department of Labor and Industries, General Administration Building, Olympia, Washington 98501 _ CONTRik CTORS. DISTRIBUTE APPROVED STATEMENTS AS FOLLOWS: :PINK COPY( tlRIGINAL—AWAIT P.GENCY BLUE: COPY( DUPLICATE—PRIME CONTRACTOR ,YELLOW COPY) TRIPLICATE—SUBCONTRACTOR IGREFN COPY( Qt'ADRUI9dCA'Tr—INDUSTRIAL STATISTICIAN (Retained by Department) B.F.No.1pr-•Oa-1-M. Frank Coluccio Construction Company, Inc. _ . SEWERS • WATERMAINS • UTILITIES 9600 EMPIRE WAY SOUTH SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98118 (206) 722-5906 July 22, 1974 City of Renton DepartmenL of Public Works City Hall Renton, Wash. 98055 Attention: R. Lyman Houk Office Engineer Gentlemen: Herewith please find certified copy of the Affidavit of Intent to Pay Prevailing Wages on the Renton- Orillia Sanitary Sewer Project (L.I.D. 285) . Very truly yours, FRANK COLUCCIO CONSTRUCTION COMPANY 6.z Office Manager. awr encl. JUL 23 1974 Cliff i}i: c.". TON Frank Cofuccio Construction Company, Inc. t SEWERS • WATERMAINS • UTILHIES riu 9600 EMPIRE WAY SOUTH SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98118 (206) 722-5306 August 21, 1974 f� " City of Renton Department of Engineering ILJI`51 FtIJI"! City Hall Aj 22 1W#0 Renton, Washington 98055 PUBLIC ^11IMi1 I`)EPT Attention: Tom Touma CITY ,W Ft-,NTf�M Gentlemen: In re: Orillia Sanitary Sewer Project L.I.D. No. 285 Per your request, following is our quotation for extra work on the above project: 1. 8" PVC 912 l.f. @ $39.00 $35,568.00 2. 8"x6" Tee and Plugs 13 each @ 39.00 507.00 3. 6" Side Sewer 130 l.f. @ 33.00 4,290.00 4. Manholes 3 each @ 700.00 2,100.00 5. Asphalt 5 ton @ 60.00 = 300.00 6. Crushed rock 50 ton @ 10.00 = 500.00 7. TV Inspection 912 l.f. @ 0.30 273.60 $43,538.60 Plus Washington State Sales Tax 2,307.55 $45,846.15 Very truly yours, FRANK COLUCCIO CONSTRUCTION CO. President. FC/awr s t is t I a i kk G r: i 1 1• 1 � J �� 1 OFFII'F. OP TliF C'ITl' ATTORNf:y • RFNTON.WAKft1NGT7N qPOST OFFICE BOX 626. 100 1N0 AVENUE BUILDING, RENTON. WASHINGTON 93056 ALPINE 5.167e AGERARD M. ENELLAN, City AITOPNkV Q� �p JOHNR PAIN. All.. AS111[AN' I; Ir At FORNEY 4rf0 SE PZF•o0 Skeei , `icKelvy , Le1,ka , Lvanson & Setts Attorneys at :.a.+ o"R JC20 Norton F,ui.lding Sesttle, Wne , In-ton Attention: Mr. Jv;1:1 T'. 3tdslin e -iJ3 for Local L.-tprovenent District 4285 Lear Jonn: 4ould you please advise as regarding the above captioned 1 case aheth*r yoar client intends to pursue the matter any I farther or whether it abould be dismissed so as to eliminate further e:..pense to all the parties concerned. You will i remember that an onier 4as issued under date of April 22, 1994 , dismissing and dissolving the temporary restraining order and snow Cause proeuel:in ,s of ?laintiffs. Trusting to near froi you at an early late, we reEain Yours very truly, Gerard '. Shellan City Attorney GM ind bc: Aiken, at. Louis s 5il4leg A�.tn. Mr, Erdward L. ut:ller �� 0 [PY - -' - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - r ' F S E V / f / Date July 1, 197A TO: Tom Touma, Acting Office Engineer FROM: Gary Case SUBJECT: LID 285 Mr. Sternoff came to the office Friday morning concerned about the increased costs and alignment problem caused by Metro manhole connection. I proposed returning to the originai alignment to eliminate all extra costs, but Mr. Sternoff felt that this would "Mickey Mow " his property development by having a road that would not bisec his property. He now proposes a further realignment from existing Metro manhole, paralleling new alignment and ending approximately 70 feet southerly on Jonientz property. He feels that perhaps if Jonientz realizes the increase in price would also effect his property, an easement would be granted. (See sketch for further explanation.) In a telephone conversation later, I told Mr. Stern�i_ that we would set up an appointment with you, Warren, Frank Ccluccio, Elmer, Mr. Jonientz, Mr. Sternoff, and myself for this week to discuss all the details and come to a further understanding and get this project started. Mr. Sternoff is very ul:set and may possibly re�u.<- his easement and prevent construction. He so intimated in telephone conversation. Would you arrange an appointment time tiiat would be convenient for all parties concerned as soon as possible to resolve this conflict. Frank Coluccio called Friday morning also and quoted the iner a over unit ')id prices as follows: 1. North of street as designed - approximately $17,900.00 2. In street (alternate) - approximately $33,262.00 3. In back property line - approximately $2,800.00 I Memo to Tom Touma Page 2 July 1, :974 t i I feel that the property owners should be aware that this will be ductile iron and can be built over. Frank wants to have the meeting as early as possible so that the survey Ey crew can stake and construction can begin on schedule. Gary E. Case GEC:ad :j I 9 t 4 LID 285 ORILLIA SANITARY SEWLR Preconstruction Conference Held in the 4th floor conference room, Renton Municipal Building, at 2:00 p.m. on June 27, 4974. Doug Damm of Washington Natural Gas Co. requested a set of revised plans. The contractor, Frank Coluccio, mentioned the deletion of one section of steel casing and the realignment of pipe from M11 1 to Mli 6 as well as the addition of sewer in S.W. 43rd St. , West of the railroad tracks. Doug Damm stated that there are only two gas services on the North side of S.W. 43rd, West of the railroad tracks and that the gas main runs on the south side of S.W. 43rd St. The contractor plans to start digging and laying pipe on July 8th. Les Phillips asp d about staking and will get together with the contractor. Vic TeGantvoort made the contractor awnre that flagmen would be required during the work on S.W. 43rd St. The contractor stated that the hours of work would probabl o 7:00 a.m, to 3:30 p.m. Overtime pay for inspection was brought up and since Lee and Tom Touma will inves-igate this. Tom Touma directed Elmer Shaver to send revis--d copies of plans to Puget Power and Pacific Northwest Bell, who were not present, as well as City of Renton Police and Fire Department. Vince Lee discussed EEO form which the contractor will be required to file periodically with the City. The time of submittal was ment°oned and th^ minimum percentage of minority workers allowed according to the City of Renton affirmative action program. John Trich of Olympic Pipe Line Co. requested notification prior to any excavation near his lines. The majority of thoae people present were dismissed and only the contractor and engineering personnel remained to discu-.s the obvious changes in the plan since t'ie time the project was bid. El Shaver r MINUTES JF PRLCJSS'IRUCll0N MELTING Preconstruction meeting for LID 285 ianitarc Sewer was held on June 27, 1474, in the fourth floor conference room at Renton City Ilall , Renton, Washington, In Attendance: Same Ii1Z n Telephone Elmer Shaver City of Renton, I:ngr. 2SS-2631 Victor TeGantvoort City of Renton, Street 23S2641 Les Phillips City of Renton, Engr. 235-2631 Douglas Kamm Washington Natural Gas 622-6767 x 250 Martin Lundy City of Renton, Lngr. 235-2631 Matt Kohl C: ty of Renton, Water 235-2646 Frank Colucc Frank Coluccio 722-5306 Construction Co. Robert W. Puhich City of Reston, Weser 235-2646 J. A. T'rich Olympic Pipe Line Co. 226-8880 A. J. Rowe City of Renton, Water 235-2646 Vince Lee City of Renton, Engr. 235-2635 Ron Olsen City of Renton, Utilities 235-2631 Tom T'ouma City of Renton, Engr. 235-2631 We have briefly reviewed the project and discussed procedures regarding install- ation of a sanitary line in the Orillia area. In view of the redesign proposal of LID 28S as related to the original design of LID 273, cert items of proposal problems were discussed with the contractor. The realignment as proposed and the direct connection of the sanitary sewer line to the Metro line has imposed a construction problem because of the water table level in that are An alternate proposal was discussed to set up a metering manhole where ginally proposed and connect it to the Metro manhole and set up another manhole, then proceeding north approximately 75 feet where {� a new manhole can be installed to meet the existing alignment. The contractor " has agreed to do this work at unit cost. The direct connection to the Metro line and consideration of the water table in the area would force the contractor to install dewatering wells and provide the necessary equipment to accomplish the boring operation. The contractor's proposal to do this connection was estimated at $10,000.00 We have agreed to replace the proposed 18" pipe casing with 28" casing at no additional cost, because the 28" pipe casing is available to the contractor. Proposed casing between manhole 45 to manhole 46 will be deleted from the contract because it was felt that it is not r ded. We have discussed the installation of the sewer line on SW 43 btreet, was discovered that there is no sufficient clearance between the existing 12" water main and the proposed alignment of the 8" concrete sewer pipe. The City has agreed to survey and possibly locate the water line and underground outlets to t' 2 `a k r Page 2 Minutes of Preconstruction Meeting June 27, 1974 verify the feasibility of installation of the sewer pipe and maintaining the necessary clearance as required by the State law. The contractor commented that this additional work will cost the City $5.00 a linear foot to perform the installation of the pipe on SW 43rd. We have agreed to i his proposal and respond • ) it as soon as possible. Nounir H. Touma, P.E. MHT:ad o June 13, 1174 4 R Del Mead, City Clerk nary E. Cas, tic Works n+ Bid documents . LI) 295 �} lfave received Pity Attorney's approval of rontrect Jocuments, which are forwarded for signature by yourself and the Mayor. CAry r. _ `_. GEC:ad 4 ! r 4 d 6 4�L{ r � ✓ `N' f k y ; f Date May 9, 1974 T Gerard M. She}ian, City Attorney FROM: Gary E. Case, Public Works Department SUBJECT: Sanitary Sewer LID 285 We forward herewith for your approval , contract documents as above-captioned. All blanks will tie , am leted upon execution. Thank you. GEC:mj Attach. • l i • 1 Y � y 9 Date May 9, 1974 T " Del Mead, City Clerk FROM: Gary E. Case, Project Engineer SUBJECT: Sanitary Sewer LID 285 Here are the Contract Documents for LID 285 (Coluccio Construction) for approval . There is or : document marked "Clerk' s Copy - Original" especially for you. Once approval has been made the documents are ready for necessary signatures. GEC:mj Attach. i c — Y 4 CITY OF RENTON OFFICE OF CITY CLERK Date -MAX R- 197L From: Del Mead, City Clerk To: Mayon Avery Garrett Councilman Bruce Councilman Clymer _ Councilman Delaurenti Councilman Grant Councilman Perry Councilman Schellert Councilman Stredicke Airport Building Department City Attorney Finance Fire Library Personnel Planning Police _ 1 ublic Works 7 Cary Caao F o f WAFt Purchasing _�... Street Traffic Engineering _ Utilities Lher Re: L.I.D. 2R5, Orill.ia Sanitary Sewers, C.AG. 012-74 R For appropriate action For your information Remarks : We transmit, herewith Performance Bond and Insurance documents from Coluccio Construction Co. , Inc. which are to be inserted in the contract documents now beinn prepared by your office.— these originals to be placed in the City Clerk's "Orikinal" _ file document and the Contractor's Copy. 8/73 FILE COPY t Fronk Coluccio Construction Company, Inc. SEWERS • '. 'ATERMAINS • UTILITIES 9600 EMPIRE WAY SOUTH �7 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98118 i (206) 722.5306 Ma,, 7, 1974 1 The City of Renton ' Municipal Building �i 200 Mill Ave. S( . Renton, Wash. 98055 + i Attention: Delores A. Mead, City Clerk (. Gentlemen: • '�E� r In re: L.I.D. 285, Orillia Sanitary Sewer Transmitted herewith are the following in connection with the above project: (1) Undated Performance Bond in the amount of $208,0:3.70 (2) Certificate of Insurance, in duplicate (3) Railroad Protective Liability Insurance - Burlington Northern, et al, in triplicate (4) Railroad Protective Liability Insurance - Chicago, Milw,ukee, St. Paul and Pacific Railroad, et al, .`n triplicate Very truly yours, T. :K COLUCCIO CONSTRUCTION COMPANY Office Manager. awr encls. r r _.ate Nay 7 . 1 q74 CITY COUNCIL REFMRRAL MEMO: Meeting of Mav 1974 Council Cornnittee or Other Community Services city Department Finance & Personnel Dept Head Warren Gonnason Public works Director Legislation lbard or Commission iliblic Safety Special Committee Public Works Other Transportation Councilman SubJect: sewer easement on tl , south side of rrgpertVwof orooerty owner . n,. 1 1al to 1-W- 43 d S e O W * Valley Highway 285 . Comments: Referred to Public Works Director and Public works Committee # for study. CITY CLERK G-'Org" C. (),.Lld .a, ,,;,rren Gonnason City of Menton rublic ,.orks Director �- Renton Aunicinal builain, 200 hill Avenue South <. ` aenton :+ashington 9601;5 Dear I-x Gonnason: I am a partner with John 14 Emerson in the ownership of Tax Lot 11 of section 36-23-4. This nroperty is in- cluded in L I D 285. ..s you know, L I J 2b5 was formerly L I D 273. On July 14, 1971 I wrote the Renton City Council, telling them that we objected to riving a sewer easement on the south side of our pronerty parallel to S ,1 43rd to the West Valley Highway. The reason for this is that a building permit will not Le issued to erect a building over a sewer easement, which could c,use serious damage to the develop- ment of our property. We also own, as part of Tax Lot 11 of Section '46= lot that abuts on ari 43rd. We ' ,el the same as a a sewer easement runninc thr .eh the property abu S.; 43rd. It se m to us that fc the logical devvl^n)rent of the area for cormiercial or industrial use, the sewer should run along SW 43rd from the seF4ers north-south line to the West Valley Ughway. Sin t sly you s, cc John H :u;dorson —� '�+�1lc UJo�A'C r SAN-1 LID 285 S-170 2X r' r INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM mAY S 1914 Pusoc TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT CITY O M&. Ga&y Caee FROM: DE!_ MEAD, CITY CLERK RE: S.W. 43&d St&eet San.ita&y Sewe&6 ( L . I . D. 285 ) Pipe Line Noa . 209, 442 and 209, 443; P.A. G. 03-74 and P. A. G. 04- 74 Puu uant .to you& memo o6 &equeet o6 Ap&.if 29, 1974, we %etutn unde&e&oaeing pe&m.Ct documents 6igned by Maya& Ga&nett and mysef.6 which ate now &eady bon s.Cg- natu&es o6 Bun.f.ington No&the&n, Inc . and Gfac.ie& Pa&k Company o66iciafs . Please 6.iEe huffy-executed o,%ig.inafa with this o66ice upon thzi.& &etu&n 6&om the respective companies 60& ou& o66ic.iaf 6.ife &eeo&ds . Thank you. Def Mead i i a 6 � kfay 1, 1974 Gwen '4arshall, Finance Director 1' W. C. (:onna�on, Public Works Director q; LI ) 2% and 28� Interim Financing M f Please arrange interim financing for LID 275 in the amount of $40,000, and LID- US-in-the smlLa of $230,000. Please advise us of your arrangements. RLH.aj -� 1 , 4 #i �k I 4 01. lI�♦ ri. THE CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON.WASH. 9RO55 AVERY GARRETT. MAYOR DELORES A. MEAD O �p CITY CLFWK 5p,TCO SEPt6� Apri 1 23, 1974 Drank Coluccio Construction Q,. %00 lhpire W:v South Seattle, WA 98118 yyi Re.: L.I.D. 285 (Fornrrly L.I .U. 273) Orillia Sanitary F Saver.; - Vicinity of S.W. 431d Street and West F Valley Highway - Did Caning - February 7. 1974 Gentlemen: The Renton City Council, at; its regular rrcrti.ng of April 22, 1974, has awarded the contract on the above-captioned bid to your ccmT- parry, as low bidder, :n the armunt of $208,06:3.70 for Schedules I and III - Ductile Iron deleting the Siphon Alternate. Please furnish the necessary insUrulce certificates and undated perfornrence bonds so tiv� contract doc: nls can he conpleted, Con- tact Mr. Cary (hse, Public Works Department, 235.2631, for any additional informtion required. Very truly yours, CITY OF ItINTON�} , r I4 I i�r•�.-: 1. 1U arl DAM:jt } THE CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVt. SO. RENTON.WASH.98055 ` 0A to AVERY GARRETT, MAYOR DELORES A. MEAD 'p �Q CITY CLERK 4 A4TFD SEPZE-o0 Apri 1 23, Igr71 Constructors;-PAMOO :X,300 I-m=)It Ave. No. Seattle, WA 98103 Re: L.I.D. 2&9 (Fomvriy L.I.D. 273) (h-i11i,C Sanitary Sewers - Vicinity of S.W. 43rd Strevi. ;Ind lest Valley Highway - Did Olxning - Februeuy 7, 1974 Gentlemen: The Ronton City Council, at its regular nxet.ing; of April 22, 1974, has :warded the Contract on the alx)ve-c^LpcionCd bid to the low biddrs, Frank Cbluccio Construction Co. , in the :mount of $208,063.70 for Schedules I and III - Ductile Iron deleting; thy, siphon alternate. Thank you fox your interest and your bid. Very truly yours, CITY (F RIMM Delores A. Mead City Clerk DAM:,jt y i V � o I?I'�. , THE CITY OF RENTON z o MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 1a' 0 y AVERY GARRETT, MAYOR DELORES A. MEAD 0;Q. CITY CEEB[ �4)fra SEMI -0 Alai 1 23. I971 0'le:uy Caar:.l.ruelion, Inc. 1021 - 118t.h S.E.. Bellevue, WA 98001 He: L.I.U, 285 (POrmerly 1,.i.D. 272) Ori I :,. .unitary aue:s - Vicinity of S.W. 43rc1 Strcr I :uu1 West Vullev .`Iighwiy - Bid Cjwming - February 7, 1974 Ocvrticmet:: The Renton City Council, at its rc,,,llar m,et irig of Alrri1 22, 1974, hILS awLrded tlLe contract on thra above-cilTtioned hid to the low bidder, Frank (;oluccio (on`;truction Co. , in the :Imuunt. Of $2,09,0fi,"3.70 for Schedules I and III - Ductile Iron deleting the siphon alternate. Thank you for y.Aw interest and your bid. Very trniy yours, CITY OF RIlmN At&w47". 0,loro:; A. Mead City Clerk DAM:jt t i r I ,� F 6 h `1V THE CITY OF RENTON T gg p MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE SO. RENTON,WASH.99055 AVERY GARRETT. MAYOR DELORES A. MEAD y CITY CLERK P 0R4TEOSEP-004. Aw'i1 23, 1974 DiOrio Constriction Co. , Inc. 7265 - 2nd Avenue South Seattle, WA 98108 Re: L.I.D. 2115 (IumrIy L.I.D. 273) OriII ma San it:Lty Sewers - Vicinity of ft.W. 43rd Str(-et. and West. • y Valley Highway - Bid Qxming - February 7, 1974 4 GentItynen: The Renton City Council, at its rm lar laeoting of April 22, 1974, has awarded the contract on the albov,,-captio.,ed bid to the lcrw bidder, Dank Coluccio Construction ()). , in thu amount of $208,063.70 for Scliodules I and III - Ductile lr,)�. d^leiAng the siphon alternate. Thank you for your interest and your bid. Very truly yours, ('ITT OF T171r" 1",,fzd City Cl, rk DAM:jt M F, 1 THE CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE.SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 AVERY GARRETT. MAYOR DELORES A. MEAD �P CITY CIf KK PPIp $�'>ED SEVO-0 April 23, 1974 1DL Land DuvelogwnL Co. , Inc. 1529 West Valley highway North Auburn, WA 9&M, Re: 1'.1 ih' ; Rnrnticr:v L. —. _ iI ... "UniLany I•,.L., ( ti; W. W-1 "Ln r ..Au West Vallo; MI.114%y - bid (19ming - Vebrua y 7, 1974 Gentlemen: The Renton City Council, uL its regular meeting of April 22, 1974, has awarded the wntract on the abovo-captioned aid to the low bidder, Funk Coluc:ciu Cc)nstruction Co. , in tho amount of $208,063.70 for Schedules I and III - Ductile Iron deleting the siphon alternate. Iteank you for your interest and your bid. Very truly yours, CITY OF 11af I Q Ate Delores A. Mead City Clerk DAM:jt 9 i .\pr_l 22, 1974 state of Washllq'ton iepartment oC Lc logy Nori:,wcst ke; irnal 'ffice 1534, - .; -�fth 'itreet Rcdraci:i. ,:a_:.i:a�aon .•'5L Attentloo r. ,-%iy li ,:gger SUBJECT lnv.'-rtCd Ap.'lon t.10 265 Gentlemen; Vex- our t.ele!moas coavcrsation Aprii 27., l '—, ;- ncerning the removal of Cie inverte.i ,inhon from the design, plea.-; accept this notice of confirmation of ueletkon. Dialogue with +,eorgL "namaker of tas Flood entrol Div.i,ion has eliminated the need for the siphon alternate. As of this dat , the City of Renton will build the sanitary sower utilizing a full gravity system. If more information is reyuireu, please contact tite urdersigne Very rrul ,your+, Warren C. Gonnayon, P.l Public linrki ::irwctor GFc:mj cc: Jim havthoa.-ne Design Ln is�� rind, Met r. 410 - W. Harrison Seattle, Washington 98119 22, 1974 Ken Bruce, Chairman Members of the Public 'Works Committee Subject: L.I.D. 285 Bid Award Gentlemen: Monday evening, April 15, 1974, the Council veerrba�itly awarded the contract on L.I.O. 285 to Constructors-PAMCO. The aaard was based on using Schedules I and III (Ductile Iron) with the syphon alternate. Subsequent to the Council Meeting. this department has been informer; b the Flood Control Section of the King County Hydraulics Division, " : , County Public Works Department, that the syphon will not be require. for this project. In view of this development, the project may now be constructed as basically designed without the syphon alternate, However, the low bidder for the syphon alternate is not the low bidder on the basic bid. We therefore rpcomnend that you request that the Council recind its previous ve:bat award to Constructors-PAMCO, and award the contract on the bas"�'c—'S'fd Schedules i and III (Ductile Iron) to frank Coluccio Constrxt'.on, Inc. in the amount of $208,063.70. Very truly yours, Warren C. Gonnason, P.E. Public Works Director .401:sn 4 . . F PUBLIC 4RKS COMMITTEE REPORT APRiL 22. 1974 F --------------- _. ----------------------------------------------------., L.I.O. 285 - Orillia Industrial Sanitary Ser, ,s k rreerererrererrrereeeeereerrrrereeee.rrrrrerr-.._erere-e.._r-.-eeeree-rae- The Public Works Committee recommnerds that the City Council recim. its previous verbal award of the contract far L.I .O. 285 to Con- structors-PAICC6 n the amount of $229.086.47, and instead award the contract to Frank Coluccio Construction Cocwany, Inc., in the amount of $208,063.70 (Schedules i and III - Ductile Iron without the syphon, alternate) . The Committee nas peen Informed that King County Flood :oretrol no longer requires the installation of the syphon alte-hate. The project should now be awarded to the low bidder of the basic bid wnicn is Frank Coluccio Const^action Company, Inc. enna N--V-Wrace, Chairman W,� amJ. Grant Henry E..�Sc he Tart I George C. Ol.ted - . - 2a35 NORTwwEST 94T.. $TRFFT $CATTLE.WPSRINGTON 98107 April 20, 1974 1'a Warren Gonnason City of Renton Public Works Director Renton thnicinal Building E 200 Nill Avenue South Renton aashington 98055 Dear Nu• Gonnason: I w.i a partner with John N Anderson in the ownershin of Tax Lot 11 of section 36-2.3-6. This property is in- cluded in L I D 285. As you know, L I D 285 was formerly LTD273. On July 111, 1971 I wrote the Renton 'ty Council, telling them that we objected to giving a sewer easement on the south side of our property parallel to S W hard to the i West Valley Highway. The reason for this is that a building permit will not be issuers to erect a building over a seiner easement, which could cause serious damage to the develop- ment of our Dronarty. We also own, as hart o': Tax Lot 11 of Section 36-''3-6, one lot that abuts on SWi,3rd. We feel the same as above about a sewer easement running through the property abutting S1 !yard. It see.-ns to us that for the logical develooment of the area for commercial. or industrial use, the sewer should run along SW43rd '.rom the sewers north-south line to thA West Valley Highway. n Sin - ely yours, 7 cc John 14 And-2rson i r M , �r Y' r t f MEMORANDLM, 4 TO: Lyman flouk April 18, 1974 FROM: Ted Bennett SUBJECT: LID 273 A 285 According to the City Council minutes of April 8, LID 273 was dissolved on March 4, 1974 and LID 285 was initiated. This Is to advise you that Interim financing of LID 273 was provided by the Firemen's Pension Fund and Revenue Warrants in the amount of $250.80 have been previously issued. This amount plus interest in the amount of 540.26 for a total of S291 .06 must be included in the total assessment roll of LID 285. The interest was computed through June 30, 1974 and if it should go beyond that date additional interest of $0.04 per day must be added. cc: Warren Gonna5on Gwen Marsnall I I '-ril 18, 1174 Mr. Jim Hawthorne MM. O 410 West Harrison Seattle, Washington 98119 Dear Mr. Hawthorne: RE: Inverted Sivhon =LID 285 Here is the proposed undercroesirg of the proposed P-1 channel for LID 285 in the Orillia area of Renton, Washington. P-1 data is tram Larry Gibbons, King County Flood Contal. and crossing has been approved by that Department. If further tatormat' i is required, plc,.xe c-ntact the under- signed. Very trul yours, Warren C. Gonnason, r.E. Public Works Director Gary E. Case Engineering Design Division GEC:aw Ent. t i E :•. 4 SANITARY SEWER LINES AND APPURTENANCES THERETO -- S .W. 43rd St . and WES'_ VALLEY HIGHWAY, 2895 ;_.. 285. 1895 r, ved cn March 4 , 1,274 , . .:u Cit'> ' . ..: i1 lare9 i intrnti r '.o on_-c : .: t arn:1 . 1. , ; ,; . .; sanitary sewer lines and appurtenances there to wi ti.in _ertain .._. r it,r': `. 1. ti i , v S . W. 43rd St . and West Valley Highway as hereinafter r..c: _ idrticul•irl�,' ,� ..�rit.e,:i , !r,I! fixed tl',e 8th lay of April 1.17 4ir1 t'l a 'it; 'ouncil C1,arillers in the Citv Hal: , Denton, WdSl.lndL':r; , a.. t}F' tLiAe drll ; 1.aC�' for rl8drinl; all matter:n relating to said i.�i�.;rw�=::=nt and all abje ti :ns t1kereto and for .lete:s..ining the ar�u Laid hearing having been continued to April 15 , 1974 , and Director of Yublic Works 'v;IEKEAS •g3c�cxx?txxx6[�exxstxDcxxxXx �rxat, ,._.. ca., an r..ate to e made A the _cat Yn• -r i:er.:,o of the prop( <d irn rove ment and has certi I 'd sa:ii cati.mitc, to tt.c :' itv Council , te- ther ,aith all papers , 6 data , and int it,atic ::i .. Fc •; s ion relat'inj. to t!:e lroposed y lmprc':�ment , de5crlpttiJn t?'iP :bCndarles Cr "lie Dist' ri -t. , d Fitat2:Ilen't - of what .>ortion �f t'1- _:,st and ext: .r!_;e shiluld be born' ty the properties within the pr_i.o -ed iii `_ triCt , a " t iement in .'etail of the L:.ical lmtrn eroen*. ds: _nt .11t-st•anklil;c r 'mpai: a;nst t?,- property in tl',� t)rop-)sed District , anO a .statement ci the agGregate actual valuation of ti,e re,, ' , :et,('e , inci .(•1in 2_5C of l:ile actual Vd_ n tir? O-.O:'.' .tr1Ct , .')e Vdlu'l i:' 11; Jn It j ..ht r'..I E.J:;C Ut F'C 1_rdl taaati )It ; .:nil IHEtiEAS Shcd ec t proposed i mprov=6._!:t SI:Jb: ;: Llfiat <:uil .. ;. iGt , tracts , ✓8r'_c lb c; and other t . ..'1i . I. w . 11 c_ .'.Iv proposed improvem,,,nt , and c:::timate;'. d^.ount c the co' t and expen.-- thereof to be 'aorn0 by e-.,ci. l t. . t:`.ict ant parcel of 1arA ^r 0th^r property within ,,_id Ii is and h'HEIEAS ;hie r,, lice c : --he '.:e i , uro:; said .;,Fclu ' :cn No. 1895 was given in the manner fc _v i tr,,' yaw , and sai:'. hearing was Iuly held by the City Council Its re _ular meeting on April 15 , 1974 at the hour of 8 : 0lJ dL : the follo'wln� havlrg ' ePn ' lIed and duly consil-'erelf . Name of Prcte:.t.ant Address Mr. Mike Lotto P. O . Box 2018 , Renton Mr. McLaughlin Mrs. C. M. Campbell 7626 S .N. 43rd Street , Renton and Said total I;2`Utf; t5 eXC 3e:'!1 21 . 36 % percent c � the to'tai cost bearing owners w, tt::.n District ; and WHEREAS at Si1111 hearl?1- tile Cit! Council has given (:ue consideration to the special benefits to be rec•_ive�i from such proposed improv�zmcr.t I by all of the prc,pertie> to be included within the proposed Local Improvement District ; an(.' WHEPEAS the pity Council sewn• it in the best interest o: . ...- City and of the wnato of tce prcperty ,rithin t!:e proposed Locaa 1 improvement Di' tr ; t ti. I, :;.a s a rr,I,avement :,s her,:'inaf for decor i . } i ■e J■ OR C ! l: C'i'_.! .iUL , GI. i .. i 1. ... :1 lI: I' ,._. , _5t2 i.`_t L- .._ 'atel la I, O1:DAI:,L,) ';AY�Jh PI:,,j ..._ :I i CF -!-7, CITY F i:C'I'IOid I ; T' ! sanitary sewer lines , including trunk lines and appurtenances thereto, c;lall be �.. the 43rd and West Valley Eighway, Renton, i,ing par`iculariy de.gibed :,erainbeiow , to-wi , . See attached exhibit and there shall La .., _.uied in the :ore oi:.F:; tie acquisiticn and installation of- all n ,cn:;sary pipe , manh:)les , salves , fittings , couplings , cone- ::ti:r. equipment an: ippurtenanc^s , together with the acquisition of any easements , rights of way and land that may be re4uired; and there shall be included the performance of such work as may be incidental and necessary to the foregoing construction and installation. The City Council may -..ticdify the details of the foregoing described improvement where , in its judgment , it appears advisable , provi;ed such modifications do not substantially alter the plan of said improvement. All. of the foregoing shall be in accordant, cvitn the plans and speciTi.`ations therefor to L,e prepared by the �. Director of Public Works . SECTION II : Ther(,. hereby- established and created a Local i Improvement District to be called "Local Improvement District No. 285 of the City of R,antrrt , W.: hinpton" , the boundaries of such Local Improvement District ;:c 1)—,I as follows : See Exhibit "A" _ 3 _ kp r y �� - • _ is h, reby decl.a. '. xir.at >247 ,92E . 08 'ii.. astir 1. a: _ ,pease o. •. r. nc _ --...- nd - x r e all engineerinL lc• '.a1 cti )Ti t. r ' l c: t : ., c` not Cas an.i utnr^r ;ciccr.ta' : i be - . fne l and -'s6esded against e: .v _ ,.i 1: 1', _ienoL i '_ed b'. such 1 revement inch:,: in -. -. Lc cal .M.ir'o:'• ::u=nt Uistxict ado. 285 es tabl,shec , emcra^zn:- , n :.._:z_ : : Tl . bone:ited by such i!a1 :---'v, r SF TT014 IV : t'le �c'nt : ovida_i For herei:: is such that tlie benefits t},e property are "area" and fairly reflected ±;, /st r .. t . .__,':i and ...ne met`icrs o' asoessment , :in,' i5 hc. e1-%' thn _ the assi—s-- meat shall be male i ,inst the p:uperty of th,_ :.- strict in accordance with said methods. rr - �f•ty included with- n the. limits of the Local improvement Districr :;ova ._ . ;^ ate: s,i,all 1-c con=idered to be the property specially . cn it such Lcca1 Improvement a-d shall be the property to be pay :`.c co_t an'i :expense thereof as hereinabove sped, ' On a combination of methods based on 501 of area and 50% of zone and termini . SECTION V : Loca]- lrsi;rovesent ,,istrict warrants shall be issues in payment of the co_t an! expense of the improve::,-Lent herein ordered. Such warrants si;aii -,t: p3; .ii le out sai:: "Local Imi rovem-r' ruin , District No. 285 " . to :72«'. interest Cron the date thpr,'�': Ct a rate to be fixed herea ':.=r ,:ut r:c,t to exceed 7. 25 per annum. ..-and to be. redeemed in cash , andloi Ly Local Improvement District ponds herein authorized to be issued, said interest-bearing warrants to be `.iere- after referred to a- "-eves:ue warrants" . Such bonds t•t.all bear interest at a rate i,.;reaf'tcr fixc.i but not exce'—ling 7. 25 twenty nor -innum; shall be F..ay-i ie on or before K,;W2c7x years irem the date cf issuance , t' - li. th_ ,ir:g• t lc., , than twelve years , an.1 shill le i�-- i,,d in and in redcmPtion of t ' ar, and all rev, r,u . _ cu. '. not re t ;within a . -=riod nor r�� "; sixT,: 'a.J� .�t t^.r t'.:,- First . ut. 1 L _nt' Ci+ Tre isure: _ _ .'C; 1oC that tli ..-... .-C 1'. 7n i provement District 285 is in -is han s .;.. ..cllec .,,.... shall b� rede-_::.r the llection Dial assess : . levie.i ani assess,.. u; .m '. property wi t _._ _ , pa,•a` 1. in ton equal annual - '_n.:-t , _ inen[: , w1t: :.mere.= � _ _ a rare to be horcafter, bat I,o2 : t- -;_ . •t . 7 . 25 ;-er an,. ..... , -..;d 3. J',e r:..Ci: "Fayment by bongs" -r r.:. n 1:. t'- --. . , , . : ... by l and tl:- orainar les c: he Ci t; :f 'e::rcn. ir. sf cefault , tide zayment of any assessment . '.:plc.;. the C -':!e -71a11 . .�._;iG'.e _ .P. , there shall be aided lnte"est it 3 : 4te to Le it-r'eaf ter Ilxe(l Gut nct to exceed 8 % per annul:: , a;: l ,z rc-naI of 8 T whim ,i: ill also be collected. The exact t3, 7J:.C'i I:t , Qstie , intE,i 2'ate. ...r.d denomi;,ati� rl of said warrants and bon,la shall be 1..,reafter fix.-d by ordinance cf the City Council. SECTION VI : All Th w3rk necessary to be done in connection with the making of said iml rovement shall be done :;y and made by coni.ract upon competitive 1.i 1s an,.. t :• City sh, 11 have and reserves the right to reject any and all bids. The call for bids for work authorized pursuant to this Ordinance shall include a statement that payment for said work will be made is cash warrants drawn upon the "Local Improvement fund , District too. 285 " . VII : There is herehy created and , :.iablis'tect in the i office at the City Treasurer of the City of Fenton , for Local Improvement District No. 285 , a special fund to be known; and designated as "Local Lmprovement Fund, District No. 285 " , into which fund shall be do-p.)sited the pro_eeds from: the sale of revenue warrants drawn against aaid fund which may he issued anti sold by the City and collocricns pertadnin, to asses rnent , and .;•,ainst i:'h.ich fund Shall be issued cash war: .,.,. .. . cr tl', , contractor or c.,ntractcrs in payment for the work tc, be done :v t?:•,ni in cennr• t:i. r; with sail _ r _ _n,emer.t , and in ay;lent of all expense in o _ciicn w th IA l iP1 Director of Public Works .>E C i 10:1 I: a t-? . . .._ .. a r.,! d 1rocted �o call fci , , in the by 1r.. , ; Or `_he _Onstruct_' Or, and inS-t111_iT.1On Ot the il7Drovements authorized here.n. ..Ile Cit 1_ _ in lieu bon.ls _zr.d warrants in th slid ex::er,sF_• ci th' :.`cresaid Local iin'�rovement Li_ tric _ ,installr• t note . payable out of the Local Improv.--mcr,t Diarrict i , n,i , lursuant to ..C'W 35 . 45 . 1.50 , whenever such r;o'.e oI' nctes arC ;fold exclu'slvr,,lv to anct.",or t'l.;nd c t the City as an in.astmcnt thcreef , ar. ' s f,;rt; cr -Y, idea �y la:: w. Such installment note or nct ^,iay be ;—zsued any time after a thirty-day period allowed Ly law ; or the ayment or assessments of said District without penalty or interest , an.1 such note or notes may be of any lenomination or, dencninations , the aggre ate of whic. shall represent t':e halance of the cost and expense of the Local. Improvement Diar. ict. which is to be borne by t':e property owners therein, and as further provided by law. PASSED BY Ti;E CITY C:`J%ICIL this ; sth c'ai cf Apxi1 197 4 atx:cbt',�.'�skL42iTc T ;' C'-e ri: Delores A. Mead, APPROVED 6Y TEE ! rAYOR this 15t_h 'ay cf April ' 97 4 ,M ery mar ettMayer Apo ved as to ior!;•.: ( — G card ;4. a :ellan , Cit;: ,,t. -.r:,• y Date of Publicatijn: 4-19-74 - 5 - P 1" s � y �, IP EXHIBIT "A" RESOLUTION 1895 L. .D. 289 BEGINNING at the intersection of the ee '. margin of State Road 181 (West Valley Road) with the north lino of the South one- half of the Southwest one-quarter of Section 25, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M. ; thence Southerly along said East margin of State Road 18'. to the North margin of Southwest 43rd Street (South 180th Street); thence Easterly along said North margin of Southwest 43rd Street to the East line of the Northwest one-quarter, of the North- east one-quarter of Section 36, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M. ; thence Northerly along said Easterly line to North line of said Section 36, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M. ; thence Westerly along said Northerly line to the Westerly margin of Puget Sound Electric Railway right-of-way; thence ''''ortherly along said Westerly margin to the North line of South one-half of the Southwest one-quarter of Section 25, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M. ; thence Westerly along Said North line to tha Easterly margin of State Road 181 and the point of beginning. f ct Y ' 1 kp . 1 E t f } 0 (b) Improvements : Ar I Approx. Pipe Size On FROM TO 8" Pipe West Margin of Puyet a point 300 feet to a point 150 [u Sound Electric Railway South of the North °eet North of the Right-of-Way line of the South North line of one-half of the Southwest 43rd Southwest one- Street quarter of Section 25, Tounship 23 North, Range 4, W.M. 8" Pipe On a line 150 feet West margin of To a point 771 .5 North of & parallel Puget Sound Power feet West of West to S.W. 43rd & Light Co. right- margin of Puget of-way Sound, Power & Light Co. right-of way 10" Pipe A line 677 feet North West margin of Metro manhole R of the North margin of Puget Sound 18-17 located 564 S.W. 43rd Street Electric Railway feet North of the right-of-way North margin of S.W. 43rd Street 18" Casing A line 677 feet North West margin of 222 feet East of of the North margin of Puget Sound the East margin of S.W. 43rd Street Electric Railway Burlington Northeri right-of-way right-of-way CITY OF RENT,`; NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BY RENTON CITY COUNCIL NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Renton City Council has fixed the iSrh day of April , 197A_, at 8 : 00 P .M. in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building, Renton , Washington as the time and place for a public heari•,g co consider the following : L.I.D. 285 - SanitarySewer Lines and Appurtenances ppurtenances Thereto in the Vicinity of S. W. 43rd Street and West Valley Highway. CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING (Continued from April 8, 1974) Any and all interested persons are incited to be present to voice approval , d+ sapproval or opinio- s on same . CITY OF RENTON Delores A. Mead, City Clark DATE OF PUBLLCATION April 10, 1974 C E R T I F I C A T I O N STATE OF WASHING' JN) ) se. COUNTY OF KING ) Five S s- hereby certify that -6+re•ee (*) copies of the above not--ice were posted by me in ' Five. e9vwe conspicuous places on the property described and one copy was posted at the ci y Municipal Building , Renton , y�►phington on data of 1 �r�/ /Q� 19 74/ I Signed �Notar�"ublic in and for the State of Washington, residing at Renton. April 15, 1974 Del Mea6, City Clerk Warren C. Gonnason, P.E. , Public Works %rector L.I.D. 285, SANITARY SEWERS S.W. 43rd 6 VICI iTY We have examined the legal descriptions contained within the attacked Ordinance; ordering construction of the above referenced L.I,D. , and find them to be satisfactory, The amount of the L.I.D. including Attorney's fees, Clerk costs, Finance, and Engineering is $247,925.28 The protests recorded as of 3:00 p.m. . April 15. 1974 are: Mr. Nike Lotto, P. 0. Box 2018 °enton Mr. McLaughlin Mrs. C. M. Campbell, 7626 S. W. 43rd St. Number of years the L.I.D. is to in is 20. Percent of protests is 21.36% Warner C. C.nnnason, Public S:orks Director GC:W Atte. CITY OF RENTON i . NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BY i RENTON CITY COUNCIL RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING Council Chambers - 8 :00 P .M. April 8 , 1974 NOTICE OF PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT , L. I . D . NO . 285 THEREON YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIF' ED that the City Council of the City of Renter , Washington on March c , 1974 adopted Resolution No . 1895 declaring its intention to construct and install sanitary better lines and appurtenance: thereto in th, vicinity of S .W. 43rd Street end West 1'a1ley Highway as described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto, and to create a local improvement district to assess the cost and expe'ns_ 9 of said improvement against the properties: ir such district specially benefited thereby ; in accordance with plans and specification" to be prepared by the Renton Engineering Division of the Department cf Public Works . Reference 1s made to Resolution No . 1895 for a more particular description of the nature and territorial extent of such improvement . YOU ARE FURTHER NOTI)'IED that a Hearing rill be held by the. City Council on this proposed improvement on tha 8th day of April , 1974 at the hour of 8 : 00 P.M. , Renton City Council Chambers , Second Floor, Renton Municipal Building, 200 Mil . Avenue South , Renton, Washington 98',55 . Written protests may b, filed with the Cit; Cle-k at or prin. to •he time fixed fur said Hering and should lnc.ude toe L. I .D. number or oe,er identifying description. Opinions for or against say also be expressed in person at said meeting. The total estimate,! cost and tapense of this prupobed improve- ment is $247, 925 . 28, all of whit:: will be horue by and assr.sved against the property specially benefited by the proposed improvement , unless hereafter timely modified or amended by the City Council . Below are shown the estimated benefits to and assessments against the property there listed , of which you are the owner or reputed owner as shown on the records of King County . 1 TOTAL, PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL, L. I .D . 285 $247 , 925. 28 i DATE OF PUBLICATION 3/22/74 6 3/24/74 eso ut on C E R T I F I C A T 7 O N STATE OF WASHINGTON) ) ss. COUNTY OF KING ) �11 F) Yr ? I . _.� � '� ' t - 1_ j n + ��+y S hereby certify that .a�a4 HN copies of the above notice were posted by me in three conspicuous places on the property described and one copy was posted at the City Municipal Building , Renton , Washington on date of 19 Zel r � signer_, J ATTEST, _ Notary Public in and for the State of Washington , residing at Renton. , 1 r ff C E%HIBIT "A" RESOLUTION 1895 L1 .0. �a5 BEGINNING at the intersection of the east margin of State Rued 181 (West Valley Road) with the north line of the South one- half of the Southwest one-quarter of Sectiosald�Eastnmarginship 3ofostate Range 4 East, W.M. ; thence Southerly along Road 181 to the North margin of Southwest 43rd Street (South 180th Street); thence Easterly along sdid North margin of Southwest 43rd eat Bone-quarter jo the soflSectionine of t36,NTownship 23eNorth,eRange 4hEt'st.th- W.M. ;Section 36,thence Northerly along said Easterly line to North line of Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.. ; thof- said Puget Westerly along said Northerly line to eNortherly along said Sound Electric Railway right-of-way; Westerly margin to the North line of South one-half of the Southwest one-quarter of Section 25, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.. ;said North line to the Easterly margin of State thence Westerly along beginning. Road 181 and the pint of beg g• ) i V I PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE REPORT The Public Works Committee has reviewed the bids submitted for construction of Sanitary Sewer Local Improvement District No. 265 (formerly L.I.D. 273). The Committee recommends that the Council accept the bid of Contractors-PAMCO, Schedules I and III (ductile- iron) with the syphon alternate in the amount of $229,086.47, and that the Mayor and City Clerk be authorized to execute the contract. i Ken Bruce Cna i rm:n Henry Shellert Bill Grant 1 5GJ �I t i Ken Bruce, Chairman Members of the Public Works Cormittee RE: L.I.D. 295 Gentlemen: February 7, 1974, five bids were received for the construction of the above noted L.I.D. (former L.I.U. 273; and referred to your committee for recommendation. The bids are as follows: :,. I.D. 273- ri : lia anitary Sewers - did Opening -February 7, 1974 contractor BB Schedules ;J,edules Schedules AA-EEO I $ I1 L III I 8 IV Frank Coluccio Const. Co. X ; 194,067.37 3 208,063.70 S 193,395.77 9600 Empire Way So. Seattle, WA 98119 -onstructors-PAMCO X 213,140.89 229.096.47 213,246. 19 '000 Fremont Avenue No. Seattle, WA 98103 DiOrio (onstruction, Co. Inc. X 360,441.90 371,435.1-2 383,9S5.39 7265-2nd Ave. So. Seattle, WA 98108 LDL Land Development Co. Inc. X 363,146.00 366,480.uO 359,373.00 IS29 West Valley liwy. No. Auburn, WA 98002 O'Leary Construction, Inc. X 372,772.53 �395,887.99 333,620.94 1021 - 118th S.E. 9ellevue, Washington 98004 Engineering Estimate 212,370.27 276,41)3.20 201,611.42 9 Memoers o' uie Public Works Committee As you will note, three separate bid schedules were submitted by each contractor for concrete pipe, ductile-iron pipe, and P.1 .C. (Mastic) pipe. lased upon the bids received, Frank Colucclo Construction Company appeared to be the low bidder for all three pipe schedules. Subsequent mestings with the property owners have indicated their preference for the ductile-iron pipe as the pipe to be used within the project. Since the bid-opening, the City has received a letter from Mr. Coluccio indicating that he made a mistake in his bid relative to the "syphon alternate" item, and seeking to clarify his bid. We have also received correspondence from the Contractors-Pamco and their attorney, challenging Mr. Colucciooc bid. These matters have been reviewed by the City :,ttornoy, who ha; advised that Mr. Coluccio could be considered the low-bidder on the basic bid (without syphon-alternate) , but that Contractors-Pamco must be considered low-bidder for the project with the syphon alternate. We feel the syphon construction is essential to the project , as it provides a crossing under the proposed P-I flood control channel. This decision had not been made at the time of bid call, which was the reason the "syphon alternate" waa proposed. It is our recommendation that the Committee recommend to the Council that the contract for construction of L.I.D. 285 be awarded to Contractors-Pamco, with the syphon alternate, in the amount of $229,086.47 (Schedule I ( III-Ouctile Iron) and that the Mayor and City Clerk be authorized to execute the contracts. a I Very truly yours, Warren C. Gonnason, PT.— RLH:mi Public Works Director 5' F L I i Y 1 A 4. April 9, 1974 ionorabla Avery t,arrett, 'Mayor �Jemhers of the City Council RC: Local Improvement district Ao. 285 S.W. 43rd Sa,. tary Sewer (Orillia) Gentlemen: Ille following engineer's report is submitted for L. I.U. 285. 1. The total estimated cost, including; engineering, taxes legal services and L.I.D. costs is 4247,925.28. 2. The valuation of the property 4ithin the proposed district plus 2St of the existing improver nts it $796,835.00. adequate to support the proposed ;istric ..T:er'e is also an assessment against these properties f, r Llo 269, a Water Local Improvement District in the naunt of a85,667.84, 3. me City, as of 5:30 o'clock P.M. P.! .T. has received 3 written protests against the L.I.D. These protests represent 21.36 percent of the estimated cost of the Local Improvement ftistrict. Yours vary truly, Wsrron C. Gonnason. K. GL°C:ai Public Works Director t WASH 6.II�NGTO N STATEO[V[LOpINb YN[ FC.NOMY lMP [ TUUPIIN [ rNbbetPY tl RLe[/HCU ! FORIrGN !P.[Ol [ NUl l l[P 1'11 U(.R FIS r ` �bY.....-L� GOVERNOR APR - 5 1974 Mr. Richard C. Houghton Utilities Engineer Q City of Renton Municipal Building �' ✓s .a 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98J55 O Dear Mr. Houghton: Thank you for making an inquiry on the availability of Economic Assistance Authority (EAA) funding for the sewer project described in your March 18 letter. As indicated to you on the telephone by John Harter, the EAA is not considering applications for puhlic facility assistance at this time because of limited funds. If the Legislature favorably considers the supplemental budget request during the present session; the EAA will be back in business. We will then notify local govern- ments of the funding availability. I can appreciate the apprehension the property owners likely feel in being asked to undertake the full cost of the $250,000 LID when there are not firms commited to occupy the land. I can only encourage you to proceed with your hearing. S' rely, obert A. Anderson Chairman Economic Assistance Authority JEH: 72/12 eXQO'74 wHria;fNu 5{wkln+.US11 Mby-o1�..w�N "Atilt: 011,1CF: Ilrt r `a( lYC. NO. iNtl 100, . .r . . ....tar N"1L FIN 1U Z)-. 9v:. Y V April S. 1974 i' J. .1. Gordon, Manager Property Management 1 Burlington 'northern Industrial Development and Property Management 820 Central Building Seattle, Washington 98104 Attention: Ms. Katherine Johnson, lease clerk SUBJECT: Crossing Permits 209,442 r; 209,443 Orillia Dear Mr. Gordon: Enclosed please find permits that were inadvertently omitted from the reply envelope, copy of which is included for your reforence. 1 hope this has not causod you any problems. Very truly yours, Warren C. Gonnason, P.E. Public Works Director CAC:uj Gary E. Case Design ligineering r !p { F° I M I e t �pri ] 1974 4' State of Washington Oepartwent of Ccology Northwest Regional Office 15345 N.E. 36th Street Redmond, Washington : 805? Attention: r. ;ary drug„e- SU(jLO : iAp 21'5 Gentlemen. With reference to your letter dated March Zo, 1974. please be advised that the City of Renton has a regular maintenance program throughout the Citv's sanitary sewer system. As this LIO will become part of the system, regular flushing and cleaning at proper intervals will be en- forced to insure satisfactory service to affected properties. At the present time, the LID cannot afford to install the system you describe because of the extra cost derived by doubling the system as both pipes would have to be encased in steel, both pipes would be required to be ductile iron, and the two affected manholes would have to be enlarged to allow two (1) ten inch pipes. the slope and flow would not allow a six inch pipe to be used. A very quick estimate would be an additional $=5,00n, which weld ',ave to be borne by the property owners. As this system is berg contracted in extremely poor conditions, i.e. high water table, etc. , and in the area of a proposed drainage ditch, we must request a variance to allow the installation as designed. 'rho City of Renton has trained personnel and proper flushing equipment to utilize design manholes to complete satisfaction of the City. Yours ver+ truly, Y9arren C. Gonnaron- i 9. GAt'm7 public Works Director e r March 26, 1974 The City of Renton Municipal Building 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 Attention Mr. Gary Case SUBJECT: SANITARY SEWERS, ULID #285 SOUTHWEST 42nd STREET and WEST VALLEY ROAD Gentlemen: The plan review of the referenced project received in this office on December 19, 1973, cannot be completed for the following reason. The plans do not comply with the following Section of the Ten State Standards, Section 27. It states. .. ... . . ... . . Inverted siphons should have not less than 2 barrels, with a minimum pipe size of 6 inches and shall be ptovided with necessary appurtenances for convenient flushing and main- tenance; the manholes shall have adequate clearances for rodding; and in general, sufficient head shall be provided and pipe sizes selected to secure velocities of at least 3.0 feet per second for average flows. The inlet and out- let details shall be arranged so that the normal flow is diverted to 1 barrel, and so that either barrel may be cut out of service for cleaning. A copy of the Ten State Standards has been forwarded to Bob Bergstrom. Please submit the revised plans reflecting the necessary changes. If questions should arise concerning the above-mentione6 deficiencies in design, please contact this office at your convenience. Very truly yours, pF � GARY BRUGGER r �� Plan Review Engineer Environmental Quality •- 'y_ GB:mk t P I 1y r F I l r pF IL J !. OFFI E' OF Till: E•rrY ATTORNEY • REI'NT0N, %%'Atitn Nc:TON POST OFFICE BOX 626. 100 2N0 AVENUE BUILDING, PENTON. WASHINGTON 99055 ALPINE 5.8678 0¢IA GERARO M SHELLAN, CITY ATTORNEY Q VP JOHN R. RAIN, JR., ASTI4TAN1 I IT' Al IORNEY 0 j �4TfO SEPS`�04` March 30 , 1974 r�r CONFIDEUTIAL t P Mr. Warren Gonnason Director of Public Wori:s Municipal Building Renton, Wasiiingb .i 98055 Re: Proposed LID 285 Dear Warren: This is in pursuance of our various discussions last week on the proposed LID 285 which is a successor in interest to LID 273 , heretofore abandoned, but with a modification in its boundaries by deleting certain property owners (i.e . railroad property to the North of Sternoff) and adding certain other premises . As we understand the situation the proposed preliminary assessment is predicated on assessing cost of around $50 ,000 .00 or thereabouts which involves the cost of extending the sewer line across various sets of railroad tracks , unto the property owners located to the west of these lines and none of the costs to the owners located to the east. As yoli know, I have expressed some doubt as to the legality of allocating the costs in such a manner in view of applicable State statutes . y We call your particular attention to RCW 35 .44 .01.0 which requires all property which is included within the limits of an LID to be considered property especially benefited by the LID and "shall be the property to be assess, _° to pay the cost and expense thereof-- ". In all such cases the total cost and expense shall be assessed upon all the proper, in accordance with the special benefits conferred ab'e on tie zone and termini method unless the City elects to follow some other equitable method of assessment. Please also refer to RCW 35 .44 .020 which specifies the cost items to be included in every LID fa, assessment against each parcel of property within the district. It would be our opinion that if you have one continuous LID then in any such case all of the property inclu e wit 3.n iie limits Of said LID must be COnsl e� to �e tie property especially benefited t l 4 and must be assessed to pay the costs and expenses thereof. I 3c not believe that you can take one particular portion of the costs a, within one , continuous LID and asses,, it to some property owners and not' to others ! , on the other hand, one continuous LID is not applicable , then you will have to follow the provisions of RCW 35 .43.050 or alternately create two separate districts . The reason that I am somewhat concerned about your proposed method of assessment is the case that I personally tried entitled "Sterlin Realty Co. et al -vs- the Cites of Bellevue , 68 Wash 2nd, 76� enclosing a copy o t at ecision or your benefit. You may remember that this case reached our Supreme Court and John Ehrlichman, as special counsel , represented the City of Bellevue while the under- signed represented the Plaintiff property owners . The trial court held for our clients and the Supreme Court affirmed that decision after an appeal thereof by the City of Bellevue. In that particular case the City of Bellevue attempted to assess unto certain property owners the cost of acquisition of right of way, for street improvement , to the owners within that portion of the street where right of way had to be paid for instead of allocating the total costs within one , continuous district . The Supreme Court, as well as the trial -ourt , held such procedure to be illegal and enjoined the City of Bellevue from proceeding. The basic question in most of these cases is "to what extent is a particular tract benefited by the en.-.ire improvement and is the particular tract assessed proportiora e y with e other property included within the LID? Our Supreme Court held that there was nothing in the State statute to support the City of Bellevue 's argwaent that a specific kart of the cost of an improvement may be assessed against a part of the district if the council finds that part of the district be specially benefited by that particular expenditure . The statute permits a City to exclude part of the cost of an improvement from being assessed against the property of the district , and provides that all of the property of the district shall be assessed its share of t ire costs d expense Tt ear ^, meaning he improvement in its entirety. After you read this particular opinion you may find some similarity between what the City of Bellevue attempted to do and what is proposed to be done in LID 285. As I mentioned to you the other day if this particular issue results in some kind of a "legal hassle" or litigation, I undoubtedly should disqualify myself since our fir:.i, at one time , handled the Estate of Dr. D. J. Laviolette, now deceased, one of the co-owners of property next to the West Valley Highway, which property is now held in trust by the Peoples National Bank of Washington, one of theprotestors . This is the same parcel of property that is also partially owned by Mr. and Mrs . M. W. Lotto. We still do occasional -2- K I l work regarding the Laviolette trust with the bank and therefore would also have to advise them that we r_ould not render any legal services on the trust behalf if legal complications should arise. I thought I should pass the information on to you so that you are fully familiar with the circumstances . If we car, be of any further assistance to you in this matter, please advise . We remain i Veryruly yours , w � (- Gera Shellan City Attorney GMS:bjm (enc . ) i + F r G F s I E r I r F COME OF T F E D O C U .. is T S I ii 3 THE F0LL0 '1IITG CASE A F B UER EA O — ABLE T H E R E F 0 R T .`iE POO R REPRO - D U C T I O F O N F I L a . I �v. .- �P � Y+ * SIR A.1 '„ :`• ' -1^_••A' {�• ;,� r , a w .. .;. ;,, {i 760 STERLING REALTY Co, v, BELLEVUE [hg W s � June 19661 STE new trial is reinstated, and the cause is remanded theref for a new trial under particul Costs will abide the final determination of the cause` assessment roll where the Ord ROSELLINI, C. J., Orr, J., and LANGENBACH, J. Pro T oth in effec concur, otheerr ordlnaaa r t HILL, J.. concurs in the result, a Appeal from County,No.598. 1963. Affirmed. Acticn for in [No.37184. Department one. dune 16,1966.1 judgment in fav STERLING REALTY Co., et al., Respondents, v. THE CITY G Hullin, Ehrlic BELLEVI*E, Appellant." Haugan,Shell (il against each�parcalnOf land within Concepts. The essment' con& Burdell, } Parcel of land within a local improvement district should te, as nearly as reasonably Practicable, in accordance with.* HUNTER,J,—'I the special benefits gained by that Parcel from the entire improve- permanently en ment, and should be a Proportionate share of the total ssessmen, ;- respondents' pre against th,•whole district. [2] Same--Assessment—L(Ds._Statutory Formula itiora —Addl Forsau local improvem, Iaa. While RCW 35.4,1.080 Permits an ordinance orderin¢ local im` Separate aSSeSSn l Droveents to expressly provide that the statutory zone-sari m -ter - the right-Of-wa' +' mini method of apportioning special benefits throughout a local', which the right- _. improvement district will not be followed and that a special beneLt:. a formula will be Utilized instead, the The history of permit the use•of both the zone and termini and some othO statutes the litigation w} formula to assays the cost of a particular improvement In May, 1960, { f51 Same-Aasesaa,enM-LIDS—Divlsioa Into Units—Authority. There: 359, establishing '. is no statutory authority, and a city or town does not have the legal=power, to divide a continuous local improvement project into units,-' - LID 59-S-13. T} t� in order to assets the cost of acquisition of rights-of-way against thR construct an 8-b units from which the rights-of-way were acquired, and the assess as 106th Avenue ment procedure utilized must be reasonably based upon- west thorou hfa benefits derived from the entire project in relation to all the g property within the local improvement district. Rance 359 provic f4l Same—Asa teriw assessment units esament--LID.w—gource of Property Acquired. In deter:. �"+` mining the special benefits to the south two block: district, the municipality may not property in a local improvemeII di whether property was may nodPrOPortion the benefits accox'dinj cc-ter four bloc by gift, condemnation, etc., but blocks. The basi must disregard entirety the source of the property, nature of public the rig] f5] Same•—Review—prior to Assessment ROIL Atrial court had diction to enter injunctions a 1 the public appari gains[ a city's assessment of p sRepnrted in 415 P.2d 621, existing oiled ro! [51 See Am.Jur.,Taxation(1st ed.§ 7671, -, right-of-way, wl owners; in unit C 168 w=.2d ' " June 1966] STERLING REALTY CO. v. BELLEVUE 761 therefor under particular ordinances, even though there had been no Anal assessment roll so as to permit an appeal under statutory procedure, where the ordinances in question had been substituted for others cause. xhich in effect circumvented the court's oral decision voiding the Tem.. other ordinances. Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King t` County, No. 598354,Theodore S. Turner,J., entered May 13, 1963. AQirmed. Action for injunctive relief. Defendant appeals from a judgment in favor o� the plaintiffs. CITY or Ifullin, Ehrlich4n, Carroll & Roberts, for appellant. Haugan,ShellX&Pain,by Gerard M. tellan and Fergu- assessment son& Burdett,by Edward Hilpert, Jr., for respondents. nt district + HUNTER,J.—The city of Bellevue appeals from a judgment ance with Improve- permanently enjoining that city from attempting to assess 1 ssessment respondents' properties by any method or device whereby local improvement district 59-S-13 would he divided into ii Formu- separate assessment units for the sole purpose of assessing . local im- the right-of-way acquisition costs against the unit from -and-ter- t a local which the right-of-way was acquired. ill benerit The history of local improvement district 59-S-13 and of do not mP other the litigation which ensued is as follows: In May, 1960, the Bellevue City Council passed ordinance r. There - 359, establishing a local improvement district designated as the legal LID 59-S-13. The LID was formed to locate, establish and units construct an 8-block, connecting right-of-way, to be known a_st the ^ assess- as 106th Avenue N.E., between Bellevue's two main, east- n special west thoroughfares, Main Street and N.E. 8th Street. Ordi- the other nance 359 provided for the establishment of three separate assessment units within the district: unit A, ir luding the In deter- south two blocks of the new avenue; unit B, including the vement ccording center four blocks; and unit C, including the north two etc., but - blocks. The basis for the division was the difference in the nature of the rights-of-way existing in each unit. In unit A, d iur s- the public apparently owned some prescriptive rights in an proper existing oiled road; in unit B, the city owned the necessary right-of-way, which i..3 been donated by the abutting owners; in unit C, the city owned no right-of-way. i� to WN 762 STERLING REALTY Co. V.BELLEVUE (66 tp 1966) S Respondents are the owners of the great majority of 0 and ter t property in unit C. The owners in this unit and in unit ,;;,)wed. Tl chose not to donate the necessary right-of-way, so the, tw)uires the acquired it by condemnation. The total cost to the city authorizi this acquisition was $112,427.75 for the right-of-way in unit' :w made on a i. C, and $35,339.79 for the right-of-way in u,iit A. }f a ilteo Wa As found by the trial court, the construction of IC6jh Counsel for t Avenue N.E. was undertaken and competed as a si time for argt work project, consisting of F even 60-foot right-of- ` final judgmei the traveled portion of which is 43 feet, including curb' ;:nit B intery storm sewers, and other appurtenances. In February, 1 :rgs of fact, i the Bellevue City Council adopted ordinance 569, w , ented to the confirmed the final assessment roll of LID 59-S-13-`' ;he court con assessment roll segregated the right-of-way acquisition for dismissal from the construction costs, assessing the construction t -.d enacted throughout the district in accordance with the zone aiid is.essment ri termini method of assessment, RCW 35.44.030, and assessing The city ci the right-of-way acquisition costs solely against the unit tanV" panes: 592, t which such costs were incurred. The total cost; of the im:, which ameni provement were apportioned as follows: _ provide for a Unit A right-of-way acquisition cost ,'.Sy,tty, and termini Construction cost ,SS,747 but also prat Total S 74, Section Unit B right-of-way acquisition cost - - 'tF;t"' created thI Construction cost Z„7I three units three units Total $ 71 provement Unit C right-ot-way acquisition cost _ $412, improvemE Construction cost 2ft Council fin spective ae Total _ '•,-rs-.�" by the acq Subdivisior Respondents appealed from the assessment roll' subdivisior King County Superior Court. The superior court.ot _ :�.. nrespeciall r decided on April 19, 1963, that the city had proceeded. i •':thin the fundamentally wrong basis in its assessmems since their "r' property v no statutory authority to divide a local im roveivent -e ' *� to 1 P acquisition trict into sections for the purpose of assessing right it was the acquisition costs. The court also pointed out that the-- k nal ordinance 359 contained an express deciaraticn thit.tLc, .,nd in partie as ;.> rethnd of a y n.2j June 19661 STERLING REALTY CO ;h LLEVUE 763 till zone and termini method provided by statute would be t A I followed. The court correctly stated that RCW 35.43.080 ity' requires the zone and termini method of assessment, unless of the authorizing ordinance provides that assessments will nit be made on a different special benefits basis. Hargreaves r. Mulcilteo Water Dist., 37 Wn.2d 522, 224 P.2d 1061 (1950). 6th Counsel for the city requested and was granted additional time for argument to the trial court before entry of the final judgment. In the meantime, the pro; rty owners it ;""+ 'k 9. unit B intervened in the suit. Respondents' proposed find- 63, ings of fact, conclusion; of law and decree were to be pre- ch sented to the trial eoi.rt on May 10, 1963. Howeve., when e the court convened o•i that day, counsel for Bellevue moved is for dismissal of the action on the ground that the city council is had enacted a new ordinance, 592, which repealed the d assessment roll to which respondents were objecting- 9 The city council had in fact passed two pertinent ordi- n nances: 592, which repealed the assessment roll; and 593. which amendad the authorizing ordinance 359 so as to provide for assessment of the construction costs on a zone and termini method throughout the improvement district, but also providing: Section 5. Assessment subdivisions. There are hereby " created three assessments subdivisions, comprised of the three units described in Section 2 of Ordinance 359, which three units comprise all of the property within local im- provement district No. 59-S-13 specially benefitted by the improverr.,:nt ordered in Ordinance No. 359. The Citv Council finds that the property within each of these re- spective assessment subdivisions is specially benefitted by the acquisition of right-of-way within the respective subdivisions in a manner unlike the properties in the other subdivisions. The property within subdivisions A and C are specially benefitted by the acquisition of rights-of-way - within the respective subdivisions and, accordingly, the property within each of these subdivisions shall be as- sessed to pay the costs and expense of the right-of-way acquisition within their respective subdivision. It was the opinion of the trial court that ordinance 593, and in particular that section just quoted, set up the same method of assessmen' just declared illegal by the court's in Ala 764 STERLING REALTY Co. v. BELLEVUE [88 W lure 19861 STER oral opinion. Accordingly, the court denied the city's m , greaves v tion to dismiss and granted respondents a temporary .080. ' straining order which prohibited the city from pros t 4) The cost a to assess respondents' properties under ordinance 593 or in dided i in any manner inconsistent with the court's previous o ncluded i decision. The city thereafter appealed to this court. cordance t ou court issued its limited remrt u ptitur for the Th>8 (Italics t of findings of fact, :onclusions of law, and purpose judgment 5) A benefit ceive by r, decree by the trial court. These were entered, and the fin .- alone by tl judgment permanently enjoined the city of Bellevue in of the imp manner previously indicated. Bellevue appeals to- The questi rt cou or propert; is it assess, The basic issue to be decided is whether a city may div included v a continuous, uninterrupted local improvement district in V. Seattle, units, and assess the costs of construction throughout th ''q [1) A review district on a zone and termini basis yet at the same timr.' statutes which g t segregate the costs of right-of-way acquisition, and assess improvement dis such costs against the unit from which the right-of-way was basic to the asset acquired. For reasons to be discussed, we hold that ci ' to assess each pat do not have the legal power to so assess. x reasonably practi We begin by noting that the specific issue presented tits gained by tha never been answered directly. Several preliminary to assess each pa en underlying propositions have be established by our other parcels th and statutes, however. Thus, phrased by Profe (1) [p)roperty not benefited by local improvements Ttnay _ ;n Washington," not be assessed, and special assessments for sp are: to what ext benefits cannot substantially exceed the amount of entire improvem the special benefits. In re Schmitz, 44 Wn.2d 429,,, proportionally wi 433,268 P.2d 436 (1954),and authorities it there improvement dis x: (2) The zone and termini method is a method of appori o The appellant tioning these special benefits on the basis of area and pow:*> ` hat respondents' imity to the improvement. RCW 35:44.030, -- amount equal to r (3) This zone and termini method of asa�Lssment must be,,- Conceding this, � followed unless the ordinance (or resolution) orden ng thc. the other proper improvement provides that c pecially benefit( "the assessment shall be made against the propetll► v: provement than v of the district in accordance with the special benes appeilant city ma it will derive from the improvement without re er,ch parcel of lat the zone and termini method ;wined from the r f i� �.v aW rMWn.2d June 19661 STi G REALTY CO. v. BELLEVUE 765 T greases I ikilteo Water Dist., supra; RCW 35.43- ovary re- � . .080. a; roceeding (4) The cost and expense of any such improvement shall e 593 or be distributed and assessed against all the property ous oral included in such local improvement district, in ac- cordance with the special benefits conferred thereon. rt. This (Italics ours.) RCW 35.43.220. of entry 151 A benefit that a particular piece of property may re- ent and R ceive by reason of the improvement is not measured the final alone by the physical character or cost of that portion e in the of the improvement upon which the property abuts. to this f The question is, to what extent is the particular tract I or property benefited by the entire improvement, and is it assessed proportionately with the other property y divide included within the assessment district. La Franchi rict into v. Seattle,78 Wash. 158, 165, 166, 138 Pae. 659 (1914). ! out the [1] A review of these settled propositions and of the � e time statutes which govern the assessment procedure in local d assess improvement districts, convinces us that two cone p _pis ate 'ay was basic to the assessment procedure. The method ittilized is t cities to assess each parcel of land within the district as nearly as reasonably practicable in accordance with the special bene- ted has fits gained by that parcel from the entire improvement, and ry and to assess each parcel its proportionate share in relation to r cases other parcels throughout the improvement district. As phrased by Professor Trautman in his article "Assessments is may in Washington," 40 Wash. L. Rev. 100, 120, "The queFtions special are: to what extent is the particular tract benefited by the unt of entire improvement, and is the particular tract assessed d 429, proportionally with the other property included within the Herein. improvement district." appor- The appellant city argued that it was prepared to prove e prox- that respondents' po properties perties were specially benefited in an amount equal to or greater than the proposed assessment. ust be Conceding this, we do not accept the cit ' g the p Ys argument t`tat the other property within the improvement distrir was specially benefited any less, proportionately, by the im- erty provement than was respondents' property. In other words, efits appellant city may satisfy the first basic concept—to assess ether- each parcel of land in accordance with the special benefits gained from the improvement—but it `ails to qualify its j I T rt 'lH 1 •J, L i {yam¢ 706 STERLING REALTY CO. V. BELLEVUE 168 Wn. s' -_- June19661 S' r proposed assessment procedure under the other basic con- !� cept: that each parcel of land bear its enlarged di: Proportionate share property to in relation to the other specially benefited land within the.. improvement district. exc it as an enh [2] The zone and termini method provided b amount to 1 one method of apportioning shall be cha special benefits throughout a' of the propo local improvement district. If the formula set up by the' marginal li: statute does not fairly reflect the proportionate special benefits, then the authorizing resolution may specify that ninety feet this formula will not be followed and that an appropriate ' tion thereof special benefit formula vill be utilized. "Specialn refer to the special, as o g s benefits" The city argue opposed to general benefits gained °' separately on by property from the improvement which is constructed. fates to the cr, Either the zone and termini method fairly reflects these trict where pi special benefits,or it does not. But it is foreign to the theory the abutting b of the assessment statutes to use both the zone and termini ;,formula and some other formula. has a citrely re, The cit}� reI The appellant city contends that a close reading of the tV des: local improvement district statutes upholds its proposed assessment procedure. The city first argues that RCVo' Assessmer 35.40.050 authorizes cities to divide an improvement dirt-ict All property mll p di property into units and assess each unit separately. The statute pro- =�;'. cially benefi 'ides: r, the property Authority- -Noncontinuous improvements. A l - ,� thereof orsu provement district may include adjoining, local al im or the property neighborir+ streets, avenues and alleys even though the We find rimair improveilieut thus made is not connected or continuous went that a spe Provided, That the cost and expense of each continuous 4- be assessed aga unit of the improvement shall be ascertained epaPately. that part.of th as near as may be, and the assessment rates shall be corn- particular Rxp puted on the hasis of the cost and expense of each unit. This statute clearlyp exclude part o governs noncontinuous im rovcments - assessed agains only. It furnishes no support for the city's argument in the pr present case,which concerns dividing a continuous improve- that all the co ment into units. share of the co ovement in it Similarly, we find no applicability to the present case prAppellant cit the proviso in RCW 35.43.080: Provided, That if the local improvement is such that the plates manner asses: the manner pro special benefits resulting therefrom extend beyond the i' relates to damag boundaries as above set fcrth, the council may create an for the taking of i 19661 STERLING REALTY CO. BELLEVUE - /67 enlarged district to include as nearly as practicable all the 6 property to be specially benefited by the improvement; ' except that the petition or resolution may describe Y it as an enlarged district and state what proportion of the R amount to be charged to the property specially benefited r shall be charged to the property lying between the termini of the proposed improvement and extending back from the marginal lines thereof to the middle of the block (or ninety feet back) on each side thereof, and what propor- tion thereof to the remainder of the enlarged district: The city- argues that the proviso permits assessing an area ` separately on a special benefits basis. The proviso only re- lates to the creation of an enlarged local improvement dis- trict where property which lies beyond the center line of the abutting blocks is also specially benefited. It therefore has no relation to the instant case. The city relies, in part, upon RCW 35.44.010, which pro- ides: Assessment district—All property to be assessed—Basis. All property included within the limits of a local improve ment district shall be considered to be the property spe- Jf ` cially benefited by the local improvement and shall be 11 the property to be assessed to pay the cost and expense j!` thereof or such part thereof as may be chargeable against ; the property specially benefited. " ! We find nothing in this statute to support the city's argu- nient that a specific part of the cost of an improvement may be assessed against a part of the district if the council finds that part of the district to be specially benefited by that particular expenditure. The statute permits a city to exclude part.of the cost of an improvement from being assessed against the property of the district, and provides that all the property of the district shall be assessed its ,hare of the cost and expense "thereof,' meaning the im- provement in its entirety. Appellant city also contends that RCW 8.12.190 contem- plates an assessment of respondent Sterling's property in the manner proposed by ordinance 593. supra. This statute I relates to damage awards to be made in condemnation actions f for the taking of property in a local improvement district. Its i it � I t. � � mom•`V'•f�ii�`il��A �e� -rrW{t!r u..V,. .. t . r 768 STERLING REALTY CO, I. BELLEVUE 168 wn.2d June 19661 STE Object is to avoid the unconstitutional assessment of property The which is damaged, for the verym purpose of a such clearings he ; damage. Seattle v. McElwain, 5 Wash. 375, 134 Pac. 1089 patently a cos (1913), overruled on other grounds in In re Seattle, 115 Wash. 535, 197 Pac. 784 (1921). Th's problem has not been The statute. raised in the instant case and the statute is of no assistance ing the cost of of the work t to us in the disposition of the issues before us on this appeal. " project. No a The city also relies upon RCW 35-44.020: search, we ha, Assessment district—Cost items to be included. There- " of the position shall be included in the cost and expense of every local ing a portion o improvement for assessment against the property in the for such def[n district created to pay the same, or any part thereof: On the reco (6) All cost of the acquisition of rights of way, the city comn prop- upon a fundan erty, easements or other facilities or rights, whether by,' held that the eminent domain, purchase, gift, or in any other manner: Provided, That the costs enumerated in this subsection annulled. It is may be excluded from the cost and expense to be assessed " California ave, against the property in such local improvement district ours.) 30 Wn.: if the legislative body of such city or town so designates by ordinance. : I See, also, 14 Mc "« ' 1 p_ 48 (Cum Sup The city argues that the above statute permits assessment 3 [[ [3] We conch of right-of-way acquisition costs against any part of the .-_a,. t or town to divid local improvement district. We find no implication in this; " I into units in orde statute that a city may segregate a single cost item to be ,; I of-way against tt assessed against part of a local improvement district. The { acquired. The as case of In re California Avenue, 30 Wn.2d 144, 190 P.2d town must be rc 738 (1948), answers the city's argument in regard to this 9 rived from the c statute. Although the California Avenue case did not deal ti with the particular cost item of right-of-way acquisition property within ` [ ] The city 1 cost, which was later added to the statute, the rule of the e able case is nevertheless applicable. In re California Avenue v hethertb coil. involved a local improvement district established for the Y purpose of placing sidewalks along both sides of a street , order p f the for a distance of one block. The cost of removing shade,",, hade," property of the trees along one side of the street was assessed 95 per cent,, in the early case c against the lots on that side of the street, and 5 percent 244, 144 Pac. 286 against the lots on the other side of the street. This court The [assessmet there stated: o the intent of th ,r r n.2d June 19661 STERLING REALTY Co. v. BELLEVUE 769 ! rty The removal of the shade trees was in the nature of ch clearing the street, and the cost of their removal was 089 patently a cost of the improvement itself. 115 The statutes do not provide for the dividing or allocat- 'n ing the cost of such improvements to the various portions ce of the work that make up the whole of the completed ' 1. project. No authority has been cited, and, after diligent ' search, we have been unable to find any cases in support of the position taken by the city commission, of segregat- e ing a portion of the work and making a special assessment for such definite portion. +* he . . . . On the record in this case, there can be no doubt that the city commissioners acted arbitrarily and proceeded t P- upon a fundamentally wrong basis. Therefore, it must be i xt >' held that the special assessments must be canceled and annulled. It is our conclusion that the cost of improving n California avenue must be considered as a whole. (It' Tics t. ours.) 30 Wn.2d 144, 146, 147, 148. ct es See, also, 14 McQuillin, Municipal Corporations 38.117, p. 48 (Cum. Supp. 1965.) t [3] We conclude that our statutes do not permit a city c or town to divide a continuous local improvement project is into units in order to assess the cost of acquisition of rights- of-way against the units from which the rights-of-way were ; e acquired. The assessment procedure chosen by the city or town must be reasonably based upon special benefits de- rived from the entire project in relation to all the other 1 property within the local improvement district. n [4] The city further contends, however, that it should e be able to consider how the right-of-way was acquired— i whether by gift or condemnation or any other methoC, in e t order to proportion properly the special benefits to all the i . property of the district. This con'ention was answered t in the early case of Spokane v. Kraft,82 Wash. 238, 242, 243, 244, 144 Pac. 286 (1914). It was there stated: The [assessment] figures indicate a purpose to maintain the intent of the former assessment to make the property 2S 68 wn.2d ' of G p , r •• '.��_ •••., :., .a.C...uu�ivaireN�.lip"i'+sty{ LA 1 , � 770 STERLING REALTY Co. v.BELLEVUE 18g Wn 2d « ------- June 19661 owner bear an award in condemnation proceedings by brief. We find th charging it back in the way of an assessment for benefits, an intent which in ail of these proceedings has been but the late filing, an ill concealed. The judgment In some of our cases where there was no question of 1 bent relative benefit, the court has said that a propertyRoSELLrNi, C. J could not complain of the amount of the sseet pro- vided it did not exceed the benefits. In those cases the ;questions of relative value seem not to have been raised. It has nevet been our purpose to hold,for it is not the law, [No.378- that a property owner can be compelled to give his prop_. R°BERT H. BUNNF erty for a public use without compensation; or, in meeting a burden common to the public,pay more than his relative 'c share. The question here is, not whether the particular 1i1 New Trial—EHec 6 property is benefited, but whether all property relativel Trost Favorable jC- benefited bears its equable and equitable proportion ' Cosa by a mcc the costs of the property or improvement. ♦: 1 1 and, together wli ` While the temptation to put the burden of payment. on ,,v therefrom, inters, k' the property owner in such cases ma be strong, et �; 121 sam Review--1 the law is such that the board should disregard entirely „y discretion in gran the source from whence the property comes,and treat O e not be disturbed a claimant in a condemnation suit when his day for assess, not permitted to 'rent comes as it would one whose property had not been that of the Jury si: taken, and assess benefits, if any, accordingly. iT- lies 131 Evidence—Weight ours.) facts overcome all 1 facts are uncontro I[51 The city finally contends that the trial court ;vas tog•,her, are man without jurisdiction to enjoin the city, since the statutory t testimony; and sp, the contrary. The Procedure calls forap peal from a final :assessment roll and ¢ evidence go no firmakes no provision for injunctions bef,re that step. As bility of a witness, Previously indicated, it was the trial court's opinion, as it i is ours, that Bellevue's passage r ordinances 592 and.593. runty, from a j! supra, was in effect a circumvention of the trial courVs County, Re ers 1. oral decision. We have determined that the assessment �'Action Reverse i. r procedures contemplated in ordinance 593,supra,i;re illegal Action for taint We therefore hold that the trial court properly enjoined ' ' ,ranting the plaint appellant city from doing that which constituteu nn illegal Davies, Pearson, circumvention of the trial court's decision. for appellants. Included in respondents' brief was a motion to dismsi LJlcette. Diamon, this appeal because or the late filing ppellant of a 's opening for respondents. 'Reported in 415 P 2 ;' M See Am.Jur-,Et III V UE [68 Wn.2d June 19661 13UNNELL v. BARR ' — - 771 t n proceedingsbane k y brief. We find that the respondents were not prejudiced by ment for benefits, the late filing, - � jngs has been but g, and the motion is therefore denied. The judgment is affirmed. s no f1L'estion Of ROSELLINr, C. J., MILL, OTT, and HALE, JJ., concur.property owner assessment, pro- — —— those cases the 1:ave been raised. t li is not the law, [Ivy-37'46- Department One. June 16, 1986.] to give his Drop- RO§ERT H. $UNNELL et al., Respondents, v. IRWIN W. ARK 'n;or, in meeting than his relative et al., Appellants.' r the particular !11 xew Tr"ERect of Motion for New Trial—Evidence to Most Favorable to Nonmovin y. rp•tied I� perty relatively g Part m considerin the sues raised by a oration for a new trial, the trial rourt and he Su,reme le proportion Of Court musl�accept the evidence of the non movin and, togethe#.,with all reasonable inferences that g ay b as true awn therefrom, intet�ret such evidence in a light most avo able torth t f payment upon party. \ be strong yet 121 SamtiBeview—Dise"Flion of Trial Court. The jai court has broad regard entirely discretion in granting orldenyin m I g otions for new trial which will es,and treat the not be disturbed absent all abuse thereof; ho ever, the trial court day for as5egs• not permitted!o weigh the wldence and su stitute its judgment for 1 'ty had not been that of the jury simply becaus it disc t7'ee with the jury's verdict. Jingly (Italics 131 Evil overcome all testimony Far Con' ey to TeatimoaL Physical facts overcome all testimony to the n ry only where the physical facts are uncontroverted;are consiste with each other;when taken trial Court was together, are manifestly irreconctlab lib the counterva' ::;a oral the statutory testimony; and speak with a force at o ercomes all testimony to the contrary. The rule does not ply wh sMent roll and evidence go no further than to mply cast the ubtphys u on t facts in that step. As bility of a witness or a party. Pon the credi- opiion, as it Appeal from a judgment f the Su r s 592 and 593, parlor ., for King County, No. 53E.�2. J. Gu rie Langsdorf, S., en red July e trial rnurts $. 1a84. Reversed. he assessment ra,are illegal. A.tion for damage s. efendants appeal from an o er coifing the plaintiffs new trial.rly enjoined uted in illegal Davies, Pearson, A ersom, & Pearson, by Wayne J. Lac- . for apiellants. on to dismiss 1,:Jcette, Djaaumd & Sylvester and Richard X Foreman, Y 1 lant's opening '°r respondents. nePor-W in 415 P.2k640. 131 See Am.Jar,,Evidence 0A od,g t198). 4 3 E c x 7. r V P 4 LAW OT.ICLB t RE.L. EICNELET. HEN.E. EVEMSON A ®ETTS COPY OZ.MOMTON SOILOINO SEATTLE. WASHINGTON Y.IUC f 14 Mr. Gerard M r ,!A" City nttorne 100 S . Second F"t Bldg. P.O. Sox 62b Renton, Washington 98055 Dear Mr. Shellan : I hope the enclosed reproductions of decisions of the General Accounting Office by the Comptroller General in regard to government contracting where requests were mace to alter bids ifter the bid opening may be helpfu.L to you in considering the Renton Sewer LID referred to you by Mr. Gonnason. I selected these decisions because the great"3t volume of legal literature on works contracting were found in regard to competitive biding on Federal works . Very truly yours, W.E. Evensor WEE :dks Enclosure cc : Mr. Warren Oonnason - Public Wor..s 1Jirector Mr. Keith Howell - Constr+tetare-Pamco [;[82,9321 Comphaller General's Decision No, B-166S23. Digest of Decision dated August 5, 1969. Bid Mistakes"'Correction Before !ward—Duotaeera t of Bidders—Error Not Evi— dent F•-om Bid.—A bidder teas not permitted to eorec! an alleged error in his price because his irtsded bid could not be established from the bid itself and its cmr. cdoa,,. if permitted, would ftave displaced other bidden. The IFB requested b' envf­ tw'o items and ,avided a I q ,,n Inc nv,t:on p Pace for bidders z, [o rim-a tt:etc total l.rin L ' Of the Protestant's bid after opening, it wu foun(I that his unit prices had been inverted in the total amount column. In order to d_ter...ine th_ bidder's actual toil amount ter a item, by on with :he other bide, the contracting officer <omouted tee amount for each teem by m,dtiplt^-^ ,F.e unit price; by the es•intated n:mhrr of units for earl, item, r-- sulting in a total Lid price that „as high.•r than Pill the >the bids i. Tit_ h.i' adds-e the co:H-ac[m%oncer tl:at hi,, prices in.:tv:o itcr_.. utem i>a;rd uu C:e ua.' sneer,instead of "lot:' as r,q,i,-d by the IPE .d re. uese:d that he be '!'1 a. owed to n�-ec• the figures. The reque- !rd co:rectiont w-oald have ch;trged tit- ;rotestant's relative 'oif- ding position from the b:,hest to tirelo.vest. The co-rection was not permitted sine the downward correction would result in the displacement of other bidders. and no cor- e rect;t ' can ce made in that circumstance unless the existence of the mista'ae and the bin. actual y intended are ascertainable from the IFB and the bid iheP. Se-r y,,,.24 [180,102] Comptroller Geaasal's Opinion No. B-157202. Digest of Opinion dated $nvember 2, 1965. d Advertised Procurement--Bid Mstalcc--Euraluation of Bid on Total Aggregate Cost.— A bidder's assertion that the government should have disregarded one additive item of his f'd, upon which an apparent mistake wan made, in conseering his bid for award, was it;ected. The invitation providcL that bids would be evaluated On the basis of aggregate i 'mt of the base schedule and all additives which were within :he announced available funds. Since a low bid, including all additive items, was within the announced available funds, the award was required to be made on the huis of the total aggregate cost to that bidder. See 13%5.88 Ar vertised Procurement—Bid MutaJ r—Bid Correction Displacing Other Bidders.—A bible r request for correction of a bid mistakr, under ASPR2-406.3(a)(3), after bid cpemng but prior -o award, was denied. Although a compai isw of the bidder's quotation with other bids,ou addidve item A3,indintad that a mistake was made on that item, since ,he amount of the 'intended bid" c. that item could not ke ascertained without reference! to the bidder's worksheets, the "intended bid" could not be ascertained from -he invitation 11 and the bid itself. The strict rule of ASPR24416.3(a)(3), that the correction can he� rude cnly if apparent from the invitation and bid, was applied, because the c_r:., for is made would have resulted in a downward adjustment of his bid price reswting it, di,placameat of one or rrore other Udders. See )'356.5.24 [t 81,4361 Comptroller General's Decision No. B-162615. Digest of Decision dated October Z4, 1967. Bid Mistake llltenued Bid Not Apparent—•Correction After Bid Opening.—Ass obvious "roe in a bid price per cubic yard of earth to be removed was sort peaaaitted to be cornet red after bid opeajpg, deppiae the desire of the procuring ageaa to acc- uch a correction, because the correction would have resulted in malting the veroneol, .del the lowest and because the amount of the intended price could not be ascertained from the face of the bid. P previous Invitation for Bids had been cancelled because of insufficient Y fun:s. The procurinr agency suggested that, if the mistaken hid was not corrected, it would cancel the IFB under which it was received, "to eliminate certain ambiguities" in the specifications, which were tot described. A post-opening Correction of an ,,,enemy bid which would male that bud the iowe it is contrary to the principles of competitive fab annomt, unless the intended price is ascertainable front the bid itself. Furthermore, the fact that a number of bidders s brtitted responsive bids to both IFBs, which bids were within the procuring agency's estimated cost range, created doubt as to whether a third round of bidding would be justified. See Q 3565.45 [I[80,0401 Comptroller General's Opinion No.B-157063. Digest of Opinion dated September 14, 1965. Bid arrors—Lot:ectioo by Contracting Officer--Secondary Material.—A bidder was v not permitted to correct mistakes in extended amounts which, when discovered and cor- rected by the contracting officer, caused the bid price to be adjusted to an amount above that of another bidder, sine, the intended prices were not ascertainable substinti>Ily from the bid document itself and correction '+pt11t1 iaana 4kytbftd the low bidder. The AwYm1W ir4 officer was precluded from allowing correction by ASP 2-406.3(a)(3), since proof of the error would have reot,ired reference to .vork sheets and other secondary material. _ See 13565.12 (¶72,0221 Comptroller General's Opinion No. 11-150529. _ Digest of Opinion dater! Febrttary 25, :1,,3. i Bidrl'orrtetion—Eval•.r:utio:: Baser on Increased Funds—A centrgt for e item (dormitory) and f, f5p 'troa,.(appurtenant Ltciliti s) was c cel 'ere duff! of L•nginr:, . (1) allow•e the low bidder ui: the basic;tem, for which !, nee av IQ • L to out rect his bid on au additive item after bid opening so as to make a low W. the combination of the basic bid and additive aid (2) ther( 'ter. ,c`.ug advised mac semdamt funds were avat4able to award a ccmtract for the basic iters and all additives, sva73ed the entire contract to that low bidder. V4bww&4WbWJft Dae►adlees aaonhar W—, :ta Wo iwYaaa'aaae the taw Mulder an WMe WIN*.Won and addll-e,es hefgao lute r awyt...#ah.wr 11, it may he allowed only in thse instances where rot o::ly the amnort of the intended bid is ascrtair:able fr.,;- the invitation :.r.,t site bid A Cor, > of Lr.g:ctcn regalaCcn elf zip shotvrd the is:tentiod to evaleate b,ds or, the basis of the surds available at the time of bid opening. Although the invitation ttr Lids controls the basis upon which bids will be evaluated, the award clause of the ,a aizscn cou:d not be construed as Isermibdng evaluation and award on tire basis of fads atailable at some unspecified time. Therefore, the contention that ot'aer bidders mere not prejudiced in view of tire met'rou of evaluation contained in the clause was r rejected Another provision of the clause which gave the government the right to add (; -iads to those announced at bid opening in order to award the basic item, indicated tliat the government gave up any such right as to additives. In such a caseI if bids were to be tvahtated within the fumes announced at bid opening, it would follow that an award of say >dditivr% v(irld he made, it possible, only within the funds available at bid opening _.. ed w fonds would later be added for the purpose of awarding additives. Seel 5125 , INTEROFFICE MEMO TO: Warren Gonnason DATE: March 27 , 1974 FROM: Mayor Garrett SUBJECT: Proposed LID 285 Attached are copies of letters from Earl McLaughlin and M. W. Lotto regarding the above-referenced LID. I would appreciate rece'iving your explanation, as it appears to me that there should be to separate LID' s--onE east and one west of the railroad right-of-ww, . f I `M�t!t,GR4ri;'d65Y4 Si:" r..4(dh 'v.EiiaK.::.:, '-+ ..•: - �... ._.. '•� d.'k.•+fl.a-+t , . 'p1YM'kN L o: J:11C ii`al .ill:.1,}1 on ::a iiir. - Lucal_ Irprovc,-:ent Di stric t J,2,1 Gen-1e•:en: Tlis is =o aci: ._a1c ;e rccaipt r _ ;Lticc c" Public hearing" cr. 197s I'he property involved is unimorovc.l id hqs a frentaee of somewhere U'✓Er 5v3 fBc t- ' '"i ,:'.4 > % . :.1 iL I._tl.l V . Your p' uposed assessment against this p. operty amounts to ; 4j , 52 . d hereby protest :lost er.:phat.ir+111y t}.i .. propose assessment as being excessive , unreasor2l,1 ,2 and nrt'dic.,: ed on a fundamentalii' ixong basis of asscssmcnc . I': was only :Obout two short rears ago Lhat the City estab' isl,cl _,. I . i.i. 273 , now abandol'.e)l , for sewer , installation which woul,l have provided for an eil•,ht inch sanitary sewer line along the east i-n(, of our p7-_)porty , and for whic" we granted the City, withoat cost , an casement. =ne proposed ass sment at that time to our property i-as 8.4ca1 . 06 , which indeed is a far cry £rem the "�4� ,__53. 5'2 tha : is now estii:iat and based on the same "benefits" that are now being alleged, it is extremely difficult to un, e.rstand he a there can ba an increase of over 50CI. over a period o: approxitiately two years . — It ;,s obvious , Lherufore, by looking a,- the proposed Local ImprovLrtent L'i>trict that you are u1i11ccessa17i.] y penalising tl:e proper_'_, owr.c_rs w..o are located between :he West Valley Highway and the Railroad r:.,;ht-of-way in favor of thv nrop(,rt.y owners to the east ti-ere':f . Ynere is no reason why t .e pruperty owner:; to the west should have to bear the heavy burden of the additional constrilction costs , including Possible Lrossi YL; _ :'a il.roa{_ ri.�;ht-uf-i'-ay, i.'S`S' ShOL'I,: Z)orne ''v the prope, Ly r+':;ners to t:he cast ut said right-of-way . V,o thcre..,. ,'C recotrtend 1:hatl any pruposcd Local Improvement District be 1imiLed to * he oisr . !:s located L)Ltwe::n the ;':cst_ Galley Hz ^w '.V and tae F:xistinp, railroad :"ight-of-F;a'; as oril im,11V prOiigscd in 'he property owners to the east of the --aiiroad _ fight-of-w,ty n':ay then form their oun Lo, -A L:prove-'ent District. , or, if they are combined, they should 'bear the a.u'itional c::;st of uny such construction, which. tinder no circl.:risiances 611ou'l-d h paBsed or to t'hc westerl;' owners . 3 t.e would a'-so like to rc.m: nlr you tl':at the City completed, about two years ago , !.he erri*er L. T .D. T`n. 2614 in which cur property was assesses, in ::hc ..uii1 of app . $11 , 500• Any assessment: 1.or the proposed Page 7�,c or and City Co.atcilret1 ch 25 , i974 sewer improvement in the ,ii-ollnL indiQIte(j )r over c45, ��� .00 wouldbe contiscatC;'I and bL sub�,tat-Lially in exce's oY anv pcs Sible bcniIf'its that could be .icrived i-o- this _Turk sewer lire . ThE e is no c.estion in c :r minces ±^.a` s:mitrry SLwers are n.ceded in this gi•.c-n area , but that t';c c . oL assc z,:..ent used : ei in is arbitrary anc capricious .ind that can be best c- nced by the prcposcd assess-nent roll o-' tc:o v,2nr; ag(. wllic;, , although fairly anp_arcd reason+s'­1c in v.icw of the bencfitL to be --eceivcc'. We therefore ass: the :savor and the City Council to reconsider their action and instruct the Public l7orks Director to ' ake appropriate s'-eps to eit:-e_. estal) L ' s'-, two separate Local Iripro•:ement D4_stricts no `hat each property owrcr will pay on the basis of benefits r,a iVEd, or alternately , allec-lte the excess costs to the property owners located to tho east,. of tl+e railroad right-of-way. '..e would also appreciate it if you :, uld vacate, if no longer needed, the ea ecant heretofore ;ranted to th - City in connection with :_ : . D. 273, which easemenCis dated October 29, 1971. Thanking you ;or your courtee .es ar.d attention in this matter, we remain, lou,:s very truly, 1'vOPi,ES NATIONAL BANK, Trustee , latate of D. J. Laviolette , deceased ... W. Lotto, et al 2 5 Honorable Aver,- ('.irrutt , .!,iyci a nd "embers Of t I-e Pentcp C 011"Ici 1 .'!:-icipal Buil 1, 1112 Renton, l:as I i-nt, on QC : Fl-,'p( d Local Impru%--mcnt DisvricL No . 265 nt-lemen : The undersigned is one mmers of three sn.,.L lots on South-,{cst 43rd, near the Val I (n, RoLd , for which notice of -tre...�.minary assess: I.', • amounting to the tot. 1 Sum of L11-(:e. lots in question are 50 ' by 120' i-r. dimensions and 140 ' by 120 ' in dimensions . I hereby protest tht. proposed asse: rinent for sanitary sewers for t-e reason that 4MV SLICIIa:.,!-cssn,Lnt ii'. exccssive , unreasonable , 2nd that furthermore the method Of aSSC-- -SMenL is erroneous . I believe that the proposed assessment is way in excess of any corresponding benefits to these three Enoll lots , and that the property ;wner3 located west of the railinad right-of-way are unduly �,enai4 --,Ld by excessive asses=,entr. in order to benefit other owners . This is aT,iply demonstrated by the fact that under the proposea Local Improvement District, No. 273 , which you have now abandoned , the overall total cost of L.I .D. was estimated at $91 ,480 . 00, wl�ilc -his present. L. I .D. has skyrocketed to ,,247 ,925. 28. This is :,-::iL)d of tt'ro short vears . Under the former L. I.D. my -i - 31"It !L 11 ., d have been abOLIC $2 100. C' , which I considered suit. 'u :l4 I 'l ling to go along ..ith it . our p-e:3an,:Iy proposes, D. !Q10 than dCUI;'.L this CC.;!: WhiCj) I.ec":.S co;.-.pietely unreasonable Li,d improper . I t!iezefore Li.me the City Cou-.-,�,-il , %Itl-.ov_Ih sanitary sewers are needed in this area, 11,)L to authoriL;u procecdi.ng with the present plan but to limit any I. - .D. to L !-.e owners located to the west of the ra lroad rijht-of-way 1l,d rc-urn to tl'c- prior plan under L. I .D. .1 ­ 73. Fours VC art '-:cLaughlin . et al I 01:1 i. THE CITY OF RENTON z o MUNICIPAL BURL DING 200 MILL AVE.SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 C O po b AVERv GARRETT, MAYOR PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT O �P Warren C.Gonnason, Director �4TFD SEP-0 March 27, 1974 f I DEAR PROPERT" OWNER RE: L. I .U. 285 (Formerly LID 273) You are hereby invited to attend a Public Meeting, to discuss the proposed sanitary sewer Local Improvement District in your :rea, at 4:30 P.M. , Aoril 1, 1974 in the Renton City Council Chambers, The purpose of the meeting is to review with you the project and allow the City Council 's Public Works Committee to listen to your comments prior to the Public Hearing April 8, 1974. As you may know, the City recently received bids to construct this sanitary sewer projec�. Following a review of the bids with many of the property owners, the City Council dissolved L.I.D. 273, which had been pending since 1971 , and proposed a new L.I.D. with amended boundaries. The boundaries are to include all properties that will be benefitted by t6- sewer project. A new Public Hearing on the project is scheduled April 8, 1974. The City is holding the bids and will not award a contract until after the Public Hearing April 8th. Representatives of the City's Public Works Department will be in attendance to answer questions concerning the project. Should you have any questions regard- ing the project, please contact Mr. Gary Case, Project Engineer, at 235-2631. Yours very truly, L' - `C.--Bw�2.d GEC:mj Warren C. Gonnason, P.E. Public Works Department i a t' I' Marc:i 26, 1474 Kini Count.,, :cpartmont of Public '.'orks Fydraulics Division F.00m 976 King County Administration ..,,ilding Seattle, Washington 931C4 Attention: Larry Gibbons SU±.IECT: Inverted Siphon Crossing, LID 265(273) Gentlemen: Attached please find sketch of proposed crossing of proposed P-1 Channel in the 3rillia area of the City of Renton. Please note top of pipe elevation change DOr Conversation with Larry Gibbons 3-25-74. Pease be assured that during canstruction, the City of Renton will closely watch the elevation to Pr went darage or conflict when the P-1 Channel is constructed. The City at this time intends to construct the inverted siphon crossing as shown on plans �sid anciosed sketch. If further infor.nation is required, please contact the undersigned. Yours very truly, 1%rren C. Gonnason, P.E. Public Works Director i. r. w GEC:mj Attach. Project Engineer s+ M :a r. 1 BURLINGTON NORTHtRN INLiS1RIAL DEVEL()PMLNT ANU PROPER ;Y MANAGEMFNT March 25, 1974 Engineering Department City of Renton Municipal Building 200 Mill Ave. So. Renton, Wa. 9E055 r ,men: ?lease rt7er to our letter of Feb. 26 submitting proposed Permits Fes. 209,•442 and 209,443 from this company and the Glacier Park .)mpany covering installation of sewer undercrossings at Orillia. It is assumed this matter is receiving your attention and that all copies of the permits aill be signed and returned to this office soon. As previously mentioned_ if early entry is desired, we will either attempt to get the permits executed on behalf of the issuing com- panivs or will give advance at:thority to take possession pending issuance of the permits. '_ours very truly, J. J. GORDON, Maaager Property Management By: Katherine Johnson Le se Clerk D k WN 27r , PUBLIC ()rPr CITY Of a i °l , l i a � 4 'c'n 197q 4 i 4 k State of Washington Department of Ecology Northwest Regional Office 15345 N. E. 36th Street Redmond, Washington 90052 Attention: llr. nary L. Brugger Dear Gary: Subject: Sanitary Sever_ L_I�D`28- (2 First, please note change in L.I.D. number, from ?..I.h. o L.I.D. 285 The boundaries have been changed by the councils to be +et the area served by the L.I.D. Design will reuain the same, en: iteria re- mains intact. 1. City Ordinance requires Public Works ^irectrr i v-n ^. Gonnascn) to be licensed professic•:al enginjer and 311 work to be. authorized L. d signed by Mr. rtnnazon. Please refer to set of enclosed plane. 2. Please find cop; of specifications and pl,rna a,t presented by City when ' i ' call was made. 3. As per previous conversation, the City cf Renton adheres to APWA Standarla 190 F,dition.%hich L believe wi.11. comply with Its= 63. The following is the basic cr_tWria used: 8" ductile iron pipe 33.6 acres industrial park complex. average daily design flow: 2000 ppd per acre "sure 10 hr. period 6720 gpd + 60 112 gpm - assume n - 0.010 1 SAN-1 LID 285 S-170 3X Stare of Kashiarton Department of Ecology Page Two 03-21-74 I 1 Using aucloead charts - velocity 2.25 ft. per sec (2 fps required for self claming) Per Table 6 - min, slope required 0.00147 ft. per foot. !Health Department and City standards requires 0.0040 ft. per foot. Slope and size sutficlent. g ' pipe minimum size required by City standards. 10" pipe pre-determined by Metro stub. 10' elope determined by beginning and end inverts (0.0022 meet per foot minimm for 10") If further infomation is required, pleaue call or contact the undersigned. Very truly yours, + Warren C, Connason, p.F. Public WorVm Director Cary r. Case Project Engineer a1tC:sir { fines. 1 0 i { r i. TIIE CITY OF RENTON z MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE SO. RENTON. WASH 98055 Op AVERY GARRETT, MAYOR 9 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT .o a Warren C. Gonnason, Duector OPgPCO SEPILo March 19, 1974 {� I Washington State ^"-,'"�� � � ) Department of Commerce �••' j General Administration Bldg. ,�f v�_t'��h L ©n Y e Olympia, Washington 98504 �Tt. '` Attention: Robert A. Anderson, Chairman Gentlemen: The City of Renton has a rather ext, ensive sanitar: sewer project hick is sitting in "limbo," at this time because of increased costs. Thy-: system, as designed, will open up the area in Southwest Renton for economic development. Originally, when the project was first conceived, we had an estimated cost of $100,000. Due to design changes and other requirements and the expansion of the system, the cost now is estimated at $250,000.00. The project is to be financed under a Local Improvement District (L.I.D.) . However, it appears that the project will fail for Iack of support only because of the high cost involved. Is there any possibility that we might qualify for monetary assistance for this project? If so, could you furnish us with the prover forms so we might submit formal application for same. eery truly yours, Warren C. Gonnason, P.E. Public Works Director R" hr fit;'. - a C. Houghto ' Utilities Engineei i RCH:pmp i 7 6' t 4arcn 13, 1974 Del Kead, City Clerk .:arran C. onnason , Pu lic wlorks 'iircctor LID. 285 Attached phase find the t'r- liminary, Assessment ;;011 for 285, to^,ether with a tape varifyinq the total LID cost. RLN:mj Attach. v{ � alb f e " INTEROFFICE MEMO TO: R. Lyman Houk, Office Engineer DATE: March If 1974 FROM: Gerard M. Shellan, City Attorney SUBJECT: LI) 2e5 (formerly LID 273) Burlington-;northern RR Co. Pipeline- Crossin;; Permit 0209442 L 209443 Dear Lyr.,an: Thank you for your L:emo of March 13, 1974 regarding the above captioned nattier anL the two proposed Agreements with Burlington- horthern, Inc. Actually we had just sent you a memo, a few days ago regarding the same type of permit and there would appea_ to be no reason for uu to repeat the same objections since we are talking about the same form. Pltase therefore keep in wind that our previous cowr-ents regardiz:h this tyre cf per:�,it likewise al,ply to this one. ,ks you sxow we believe there is an inconsistency between the Iasi; two sentances of para�,rap:: :; and this should be changed. We also believe that paragraph 9 should net be accepted as written. If tae railroa,; wishes to cancel, it should ive written notice unto the City and then if the City fails to remedy any breac:. or noucociplisr,ce, then the railroad may teruinate the a�,recment, but not sooner. If we can be of any further assistance to you in this matter, please advise. vie r ec:;a in Very traly yours, Gerard ,. Shellan GMS.bjc I� March 15, 1974 l8 '' tih;h � iI Wr4w1.;fufi PUBLIC \'r C�. pi.P� I hqL if lffll ;11 CITY ill- F., �1TON � WI ; Citv of Ren�on Municipal Building 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 Attention Mr. Gary E. Case SUBJECT: SANITARY SEWERS, ULID 27: S.W. 43rd STREET & WEST VALLEY FJAil Gentlemer : The plan review of the referenced project received in this office on December 19, 1973, cannot be completed for the following reasons; 1. Plans are not stamped by a registered professional ✓ engineer. 2. Specifications were not submitted or are not adequate. 3. Plans do not comply with the following Sections of the �ewlfk Ten State Standards; 12.1, Para. 3; 12.211 a and b; 12.212; +�- T' .12 b and e; 24; 25.8; 25.9; 26.3; 26.4; and 28. An example of design criteria data sheet which we wish to have accompanying the plans and specifications on future projects is included. Please submit revised plans reflecting necessary changes. If _ qusctions should arise concerning the above-mentioned deficiencies in design, pleas- contact this office at your convenience. Very truly yours, GARY L. BRUGGER Plan Rcview Engineer i Environmental Quality GLB:mk i z - • P.�C-.s.�/U i ! pl:;�. ,V7- C.4,01 7',0 I�L 0,V so Cc";, GJv PcR C4Piif1 FLcrr _ /co GPC „It�J AGZc" t'J�cS31VT Fc:OyV - GOJDOo GPG' = �2 V/ Ii� !� "GYc,P.7�c OcS/GJV FLOW - //d 00o GPO - 9!o GP/d .a ,:3 COO EXTn'c/v>� !•//Nti',/Uti1 Gc JG,V FLO!✓V = a 2, a o o GJ�O = /.�." GG:i1 i�;vJ'i1fC% !'✓/.9X/i`,f(lti/ ✓=�=,'�/V FLC!✓ - 330, 000 G/o = GE0 EX%I� /1/I� /t 'AX/MUi�i G3S/G.V rLCi/ = G50,000 D=5/GNA%c,��SEFLO NYD�2Au[✓'C DES/GN M.dxfivlUMFLo,w = �G 0,000 G/'.D - GG 60 - 47' LTS/GN t�0`L1L 47�t?N = 22O FCC BOD /PcN10/r�L cXPc'C,'TEo 90 47o SJSPENC�O SOLIDS VAL cX/'cC,ED = 90 70 H�DJi JJItC a-S/SN FLC.f✓ _ �G0,o00 G,�O GJ'm NJ;4X'I;,1/,/�,/ CAP=C/TY £A!'N SC2E'%'✓ _ ��•O,GOa G/'D -Ca9 GP/.f /VUti'4�f� OF SC/2c N /-J14r1/=5 14 �1?0 os-0 = 2 i�_E_A /JP/O!C/�J �ID,P-aUL/C G�5/G/1J r L O.W 6ro G /W t [ 1,A✓� l./ux/MU/V' FRc=E aiSCNti,2G� _ /,20a,c00 G?D = f 33 GPJta ji'!� "•SJ TY S'.iI^7� 1i` 0J ,,7CLd � J�C, oJd PL' = C^o % U^ ti` 4 SU•?F 3 w E ,4'QG.4 .'°, �rG'� J.F. AVE.''AGE LJQuiO 0EP711 5o iC7 .CL'c/2:iG-c Li%UrD l/OGU//IF 12,34o C. L. 4 oSTENT/ON 7Y,^.f-x,,rAVF,PAyE Dcs/GN iGGiv = 20./NA'S. DF,/G-!d SO D LOA0ING -- 220 ARJU Lss. DESIGN OXYGEr/ n'E.^�L'/,?ci'i1c%'T - 5/7 PP49 O. C. oEr? RO%''OR AT P c 5o P. O"/, lL1/1V1"Z1., l L/4L!'L /VUM2E R DF ROMRS /9Rc ✓/r'cO - 2 r= 5LIRFACIF 4ReA oe3 5.r. f'✓1/NIlvili /! G iQ UI D DFPT�/ = G. 1,t/Eli4' 4&VG74/ • /G.C low 41GUID VO4l1 t..CLUO/Nv SLU�SF/�r?-`=5= J'.i;C' GAG. ,9�- LIOU1.0 VOI- m, OF SL " 06 '•1010 ' R'S .. 678C,F, G=TC NTJC.,�J T!%'✓rE' AT A V45P, Gt /ARE S ,vi I=LOI'/ 5 /' QETEN%/ON T/1./r AT A VE,2.4 5u,?Fr•:.FOVc,?r20%'/f+1•f1.'-�% .= P. ,:c�vrFu^iY= SU.•?F,"".CE Oie ?/=[Of/ATAfE2AGc Oc'5/G,V rZCN 357 G/'PI:;f !j!i lE?4r_a /ait�ESFvr FLCs+/ _ 4��E3a CGPJ/SF f"/EiR Ovc"2,=LC%l A7'A✓c.?AGF OESlGN rL0i'/ = 7. /Jrl.'i,%.xc:? Or'=^GlaL CC�i"•rr'.is i i, 4 NTS P? 1.'fC�-9= 2 1t�°.AGYYM'Nk11F64i1-=. 4 � I R L/QUi:q VOLUMc wo C.F, •�rarc',?,4G� Av�.2.4G` 4,-S/C-/�! FLO�c/ = 2.B N,25. �vt � DETE-,V?"/O,N T/ME' AT1Vl?.•?iL/AL h-OWM.I�'.I,Jr'a��iVfLaSY= 0.9 .P$ ,C:.'• /JETc.VTiON 7/M�XT�x%RCI�-fC ti✓..\xn�yfu,\aoe5/G/'✓FLG:%y= o•S :�?5. G�= 1V✓M3c'R OF 4FOU4L CC. fPaR7-1V NTa R,1 OV/a�� = 2 49m MAXI"ZIM Oca'/GN S4&,OG R. 7-7IFI✓ - /52 Cr'i'' TO A10R -UL DcS/GN SLlJOG= IPIF/-L/RN M!N/i1�'✓^a -s S/GN SL UO'�-c �c TL!' :V - 38 G PP•/ NORMAI- CONST.4A,'TC410.4C/7Y,6ACNi�u.�P /1 /N/A�1UiLf Oil! OR Oi� it✓•Ar'� 1:1��fir, .AL _ / n fiN OE r'!M 1?,6QU1.2c0 TO EMPTY SG 41VS6 J,rOPFSQS= 3 G "MA $� /ULJMBE2 OF SL UD GE PUM.P5 PRO V/DE/.7 = 2 /��� �VJ REVIS!G.lS • - [y u0\lSf /VO7' FOR I 41q "'O Dt�TN L/oU/0 Voiv,',ez Y / °; OEj/GN SOL/1•is nRQOUCTio/v - //o l',�o O�`3�Gly OAV FIA1s 20 pQ rs r— oo / 77 or�L OC SlGN.+/R SL/Pi0L Y ON,= .E,'Lop/�,? = 50 r Fiif NUMBER OP ?!oivS F,�oViOwD SLl��r'P ,� - l-lES/Gn/f'ZR C,4,4117: SI(IZ 'ACE ,4,P, ,c Y DES/GN SU/�=A�� A2EA RE4U/2E1� SUP.FACc'"llt�:: r''O►iYC=i 170 NG M,l3Eo OF 8=05 P1;0�/,per Q � 3 . i I I . 1 TABLE 6 SLOPES REQUIRED FOR V 21ps AND FULL AND HALF FULL FLOW i Pipe Slope in % _ -- Diameter - - - (Inches) n 0.010 n 0.011 n 0.012 n 0.01 8 01 177 0.238 0.284 0.332 I i ' 10 1 0.147 0.178 0.213 0 248 12 1 0.115 0.139 0.166 0.194 _ 41 15 0.086 0.104 0123- 0.14 18 _ 0 n67_ 0.081 __0.097 0.114 21 1 O.J55 0-066 0.079 0.042 24 0.046 - 5 0066_ 0.077_ 27 0.039 0.047 0.055 0 065 _ 30 0.034 0.041 0.04a --J­O.057_ j + f L 33 0.030 0 036 0.043 1 0.05:_ 1 36 0.027 OA32 0,038 C 045 42 G.022 1 0.026 0.031 0 036 48 0.012 0.022 0 026 0.031 54 0.015 0.019 0.022� G.027 60 0.013 0.016 0.019 0,023 _ 66 0.012 O'.O14 0.017 0.020 72 0.011 0 113 Q015 0.018 4� 78 �1011 0.01= 0.016 I 84 0.009 0,010 0.012 0.015 - 90 0.008 0.010 0.011 0.013 i1 96 0.007 0.009 0.010 0.C12 - 10$ 0.006 0.007 O.D09 0.010 _ �114 U.UU(- 0.0G7 0.0�08 1 0.010 120 0.005 0.006 0.008 1 O.OG9 r 126 5 0.006 _0.007 0.008 132 O.D04 0.006 0.007 +� U.068 ' 138 0.004 0.005 0.0 06 007___ i 144 _ 0.004 __ 0.005 0.006 1 0.007 1 INote: For a velocity V other than 2fps, multiple the above by V I �I a i $ 0.4 _4t- 0.3 — — AY� 7 0.2i 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.50.6 0.81.0 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 910 15 20 30 40 5060 80100 �k! AVERAGE DARN YDISCHARGE OF DOMESTIC SEWAGE IN MOD .` PLOW IN CUBIC FEET PER SECOND 1 N w A tT N W pA N T 80 O p0 00 Iv W P to L• T N W P u+T OG O O O O O O O S O O O O co O � ! � O za o e ti W 0 5 A + N N V \ ` - A � n • V s i � m i � I n i i i 00 105 <y m O ).4 0.3 s . H,jOSiP o 0.2 0 J 0.1 02 0.3 0.4 OS 06 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 11 1.2 13 PROPORTION OF VALUE FOR FULL FLOWIr v -7 Z. `i Fz/sew 0 r c, e t iad-� .52 140I5e4 t a March 13. 1974 Gerard M. Shellan, :;ty Attorney R. Lyman Houk, Office Engineer LID 285 (formely LID 273) Burlington-Northern RR Co. P`,pe Line - Crossing Permit Nt09442 A 209443 Dear Gerry, Attached for your review are copies of two pipeline crossing permits under the B-N Railroad right-ef-way and an adjoining parcel of railroad property for LID 285. The Railroad Com,any has revised the format of these agreements. We Dre- viously had a form agreement established w4 th the B-N, which is attached. Comparison between our previous agreement form and the new agreements indicates: NEW .AGREEMENT Items No. 1 A 2 - Same as Item ao. 2 in previous agreement. Items No. 3 A 4 - Sark; as Items 3 A 4 in previous agreement. Item No. 5 - Baslcly th.. ,ame as Item 'lo. 6 previous .agreement. Item No. 6 - Same as Item 3o. 7 previous agr•emert. Item No. 7 - Same as Item No. 8 previous agreement. Item No. 8 - Should be amended to Item No. 9 in previous agreement. Item No. 9 Same as item No. 10 of previous agreement, which we always deleted. Item No. 10 Same as Item No. 11 previous agreemert. Item NO. 11 Same as item No. 13 previous agreement. The Railrrad is also requesting a payment of $5.00 fee Der year., which I'm reviewing with Warren If you rgquire any additional information, please contact me. HLH:mw H. Lyman Houk, Office Engineer Enc. I li AID TASULAT ION SHEET P RO J EC T ; DAT7, 19 , - 32,d Con,?erenee iic: a BIDDER BID ;'rank Coluccio Constr^uctic.n Co. :onstructore-PnWCO 3600 Fremont Avenue llorth, Seattte WA 98103 0iorio Construction Co., Inc. . S. Seattle WA 98108 7 Leary Construction, >u, 7021 - 118th S.E. 1 r OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERX L.I.D. 273 - Orillia Sanitary Suers Bid Openino - February 7, 1974 Coniraetor BB Sehedules I C II Schedules I d III Schedu>es I AA-EEO Frank Coluccio Const. Co X i$194,067.37 $208,063. 70 9£(iG t:mpi re Way So. ' Seattle, WA 98118 Constructors-FAMCO — X $213, 740.89 $229,086.47 $ ?.,.4 • : 3£00 Fremont Avenue No. SeattZe, WA 98103 DiOrio Construction Cr Inc. Y, $360,441.90 $371,43E. 22 7265 - 2rd Ave. So. Seattle, WA 98108 LDL Land Deve:op•^ent Co., :no. $363,146.0 ---- 1529 West Va-.ley flay. Ne. Auburn, WA 98002 O'Leary Constr.ction, Ir.. X. ':., .�....r.'. .. .. .. .- -, 702i - 118th S.E. BeLLevue, WA 98004 Engineering Estimate -r011AMITY DESCRIPTInN C _ L.DL. LAND DEV. CO. DiORIO CONSTR. CO. O' YCo. EN 'S 1 t __ _ 300.00 - lOP 100 00 -- 4 0. __ 2,500.6 2 L.S. Claarfag and Grubbing - 500.00 - 2 000.00 -- 90,000.00 3,000.00_ 5,000.00 10,0 00 CY TrenchExcavation i e 0.02 .00 0.10 1,000.00 2• -��r�b• •00 ZOro00.00 1.00 10,000.00 3.25 32,500.o� ' k 3,000 ?? Foundation Material - Ballast 0.02 _ 60.00 5.00 15 DOO.00 9.50 28,500.00 10.00 30 000.00 ?.25 21 ;50.00 5.10 15 5 2.000 T BeddingGravel 4 5.00 10,000.00 10.00 20 000.00 5.00 10 000.00 6.25 12 500.00 6 8,000 T Select Trench Backfill 0.02 160.00 1.00 8,000.00 2.50 20,000.00 4.00 32,000.00 _ 2.75 22,000.00 5.15 41 200.00 _7 16 Ea 48" Saaitrry Manhole 730.00 11,680.00 OOO.QO 16,000.00 450.00 -1,200.00 950.00 15 200.00 8 - _ 1 FA MeteringManhole 900.00 950.00 950.00 500.00 1 0 00 _ 1 9 550 LF 10' Ductile Iron Pipe 37.30 20,515.00 6.00 3,300.00 9.00 4,950.00 40.00 22,000.00 60.00 1 33 000.00 �,25 10,037.50 10 222 Lv 18" Steel Casing - Ooen Cut 19.00 _ 4i218.00 30.00 6 11 328 LF 18" Steel Casing - Bored _ 80 00 26 2 65.00 21 320.00 100.00 32 800.00 9 .00 0 12 T Asphalt Patching _ 60.00 490.00 20.00 160.0� _ 320.00 50.07 400.00 _ l' 00 ?1i0.fi0 40.00 320.00 13 i9 T CruaFsd Surfacing Course 10.00 190.00 10.00 1 10.00 190.00 10.00 190.00 10.00 _ 190.00 6.50 123.50 " 14 L.S. T.7 __ 2.0 00.00 - 3,500.00 2 000.0C - 2,500.00 - 5.000.00 TOTAL SCHEDULE 1 83 717 00 19009D-00254 628.00 _ 1 25.00* 52 950.00 * 35.00 74 130.00 _ _44.00 93 192.00 7.00 _ 14,826.00 26.00 44 512.00 40.00 68 480.00 50.00 85,6U0.O0 8.50 14 552.00 t 1,711 LP 30' Concrete Pipe 32 00 4 784.00 2 04 4 � --- -- -� f 21 Ea 8'- x 6" Concrete Tao _ 8.00 168.00 20.00 420.00 50.00 1,050.00 20.00 420.00 20.00 420.00 25.00 525.00 11 Ea 10" x 6" Concrete Tee 8.50 93.50 30.00 330.00 70.00 770.00 20.00 220.00 20.00 220.00 25.00 275.00 TOTSaMLE 2 100.582.50 " .� _ 25.00* 52 9 0.00 * 40 00 84.720.00 BZ I,1'_2 IF 10^ Ductile Iron Pipe a 35.03 599 .36 6.00 10 272.00 27.00 46 224.00 45.00 77 040.00 _ 55_00 94 160.00 Z 0 83 21 Ea 8 ' x 6" Ductile Iron Tee 86.00 1 806.00 100.00 2 100.00 160.00 3,360.00 50.00 11050.00 _ 160.00 3 360.00 1 0.00 2 B4 11 Be 10" x 6" Ductile Iron Tee 115.00 1,265.00 150.00 1.650.00 200.00 2 200.00 80.00 880.00 200.00 2.200.00 1 0 1 TOTAL SCHEDULE 3 113,874.36 104 )3i.00 * 163 690.00 * 19 26 .00 C'_ 2 L18 LP 8" PYC Pi a _ 21.90 46,384.20 ._ 40.00 84 720.00 41.00 86 838.00 6.00 1..,'C' C2 2,7h2 I:r 10" PVc Pipe 32.40 13,288.80 2.50 5,655.00_ 24.00 54,288.00 45.00 101.,790.00 50.011 113 100.00 7.50 16 6 WC4 21 Es 8" x 6" PVC Tee 18.50 388.50 20.00 420.00 •� 5. 30.00 630.00 20.00 420.00 25.00 525.00 11 Ea N a 6" PVC Tee 36.20 348.20 40.00 440.00 68.00 748.00 40.00 440.00 25.00 275.00 25.00 275.00 TOT - 4 104 695.00 .00 200.fi 1A 471 an LESS ITEM NO. 9 - 20 515.00 - 3.300.00 - 4,950.00 - 22 C00.00 -37 000.00 TOTAL SCHEDULE : 99 944.70 7.451.00 99,745.00 165 580 I .S. Siphon Altarnate 20 000.60 4.972.00 5UB-TEAL ECHMILE 1 4 2 ** 184,299.50 202,413.00 358 910.00 342,300.30 `6 19,022.23 18.141.90 18 874.78 10 695.77 *317,932.23 360 441.40 375,J02.78 *212,502.77 TO-AL ** 304 067.37 213 140.89 ' SUB-TOTAL SCHEDULE 1 d 3 ** 197 591.36 217.556.00 TAX 10 472.34 11 k 19 311.19 * 19 225.22 19,925 TOTAL ** 208 063.70 229 086.47 1 k383,673.19 *381 96,.72 1395,887.99 *276 535.70 MENNEN I� SUB-TOTAL SCHFDULE I d 4 ** 183 661.70 202 513.00 359,373.00 364,630.00 344 329.00 192 064.50 TAX 9,734.07 10,733.19 19 0 6 77 w* 77 213 246.19 378,419.77 383 955.39 362 578.44 *2C2 243.92 ** Siphon Cost not included in bid. L. 1. D. 273 * Corrected figure I� I SCHEDULE 4F PICES SCHEDULE II t , (Note: Unit prices for all Atom-, all extensions and total amount of r IDAA must be shown. Show uric prices in both words and figure, and whero cot diet occurs the written or tut*d word, ^hall prevail.) / UNIT PRICE AMOUNT 4 APPROX. I1EM WITH UNIT PRICED HIU / QUANTITY (Ihmtt Prices to be written l: w('rds) DOLLARS CTS. DOLLARS CTS. L.S. Mobilization Per ump Sum F gures 1 L.S. Clearing and Grubbing Per Lump rm ` 10,000 CY Trench Excavation A Backfill ( -' Peru. -Yd.-- i 31100 T Foundation Material - Ballast Per Ton -- 2000 T Bedding Gravel (Pea Gravel) f— Peron ` B000 C.Y. Select Trench Backfill Per Cu.. Y . L ' 16 EA Standard 48" Sanitary Manhole [_ Per aE ch B 1 EA Meterinq Manhole Pie Tr EacTi— 550 L.F. 10" Ductile Iron Pipe I _ - $ 1.1 Per ,.y—__ — 10 222 L.F. 18' Stl Casing Pipe (Open Cut) Yl e Per L. 11 328 L.F. 18" tl using Pipe (Bored) ( - rie e, Per 1 r IEDULE OF PRICES SCHEDULE I (CONT.) : Unit prices t-, alI items, all extr's-4 x : .nDd tote! amount or cl<i must bra shown. Shaw unit prices in hoth words and and where ,.tgn!iict orr.urs the written or typed prevail.) t.JPROX. I ITEM WITH UNIT PRICED ttIp 7 _- UNIT�'RIC E AMOUNT )! t1NTITY (i'nit 1 r ' e G� I e wr: tten in wo rds) r)OLLARS C—S DOi,LARS CTB. T Asphalt Patching Per 7o-n T Crushed Surfacing Courar j , t k Per Ton- --- --' L.S. T.V. Inspection - Mainline Per Lumn Sum I TOTAL SCHEDULE I I �` I i I I i i i C !`V. r ly.Y'•� e � � .'+Kt �k +\:`' •,��H�IIUC�'��`�tt��w. ^aN .. SCHEDULE 2 (Note; Unit prices for all items, all extensions and total amount of bid must be shown. Show unit prices in both words and figures and where conflict occurs the written or typed wordA shall prevail.) 'TQM APPROX. ITEM WITH UNIT PRICED BID UNIT PRICE AMOUNT a QUANTITY (Unit Prices to be written in words). DOLLARS CTS. DOLLARS CTS .� A.1 2118 L,F, 8" Concrete Pipe 9 AJ Ve sr ir..1_l. 2s�LGe Per L,F. —for g (Fiqu—re—sT A.2 1712 L. F, 10",-Concrete Pipe tLLea.t�. 31mf :1if r4�ot Per 7 L3 21 EA 8" x �° Concrete lee 3 1C C.t-tom—' ate e Per hacu -.4 11 EA 1011,.x 6",Concrete tee Per taaLr- n _� " '— l (- I TOTAL SCHEDULE 2 CC .SS, .SL" I i I SCHEDULE OF PRICES SCHEDULE 3 (Note: Unit prices for all items, all extensions and total amount of bid must be shown. Show init prices in bath words and figures and where conflict occurs the written or typed words shall prevail.) I -' M APPROX. ITEM WITH UNIT PRICED BIC 1 UNIT PRICE AMOUNT Q. QUANTITY .(unit Prices to be written in words)' DOLLARS CTS. DOLLARS �TS.i 9.1 2118 L.F. 8" Ductile Iron P1pe �. r— Per L F u /j (Words) (Fig s) c.2 1712 L.F. 10',.0uctlle Iron P,1pe ; �— n .76 Per t, Cr '.3 121 EA 8" >4 6" puctile Iron Tee '—.� '.a1 t. ,1'e 'A Lam� n of Per k r 4 it EA i 10_'i x 6" Uuttile Iron lee ; , t.lc.! f c„ _• . c7?-< <c ire Per EA � I TOTAL SCHEDULE 3 i 1 i r - ,•c SCHEDULE OF PRICES SCHEDULE 4 (Note: Unit prices for all items, all extensions and total amount of bid must be shown. Show unit prices in both words and figures and where conflict occurs the written if tgped words shall prevail.) i 1 cM APPI.OX. ITEM WITH UNIT PRICE) PID I UNIT PRICE AMOUNT QUANTITY (Unit Prices to be Written in Words). DOLLARS CTS, DOLLARS CTS , 1 2118 L.F. 8" P.V.C. Pipe G� j S�si Y,� •G-h.G C5�c`'t'G j j'Y )>ttntjt tr>�� ..i/ C A4 364 le- Per L.F. (Words) (Figures) 2262 L.F. 10' V., C. Pi • L [ 511 14`� f L1 y C K .. Per L.F. / 0 21 EA 81, ,x 6" P.V.C. Tee Per , a- `, G -` l 11 i.P. 10.. x 6" Y.V.C. Tee ` Per Each SUB-TOTAL SCHEDULE 4 1 Less Item No. 9 from Schedule I (550 L.F. 10" Ductile Iron Pipe) ^p aia"oel TOTAL SCHEDULE $ I ' aA 7G 1 {I I it AHEDULE OF PRICES (Note: Unit prices for .all items, all extensions and total amount of bid must be shown. Show unit prices in both words and figures and where conflict occurs the written or typed words shall prevail.) 4 H APPROX. ITEM WITH UNIT PRICED HID UNIT PRICE .*.MOUtJT QUANTITY (Unit Prices to be written in words) DOLLARS CTS. DOLLARS CTS. TOTAL Schedule 1 TOTAL Schedule 2 l , -i SIPHON ALTERNATE_ ,CC e. r-r�-- Sub-Total 5.3% State Sdiet Ta� — t «G -� ' TOTAL - Conc. Pipe TOTAL Schedule 1 , f 7i -7 « .- TOTAL Schedule 3 /,� SIPHON ALTERNATE .- Sub-Total S ` .3 I 5.3% State Sales Tax 3,1 TOTAL - Ductile Iron Pipe 4 i TOTAL Schedule 1 S .; ? f 7 c e- TOTAL Schedule 4 SIPHON ALTERNgTC Sub-Total 5.3% State Sales Tax TOTAL - PVC Pipe ' ' ;'; y " . UN ERSIGNED BID ER HEREBY AGREES TO START CONSTRUCT ON WORK ON THIS l,ROJECT, IF *!RD[I HIM, WHEN DIRECTED AND TO COMPLETE WITHIN NINET (90) CONS -CUTIVE CALENDAR S A TER STARTING CONSTRUCTION. •''ED IT ;<< - THIS DAY OF ?/))a _197 SIGNED: . TITLE: _ ^R,PIi{ CC'_!tGCi NAME OF COMPANY: tlifl;;( l.E=i � "'1 -I; ' ! CO, ADDRESS: L7. , — FATE ONTRACTOR"S ICENSE _'_3 �• /_ �� ,5` � --� ":'Y 0 RENTON BUST E.SS LICENSE# l= �•r>' s Flank Coluccio Construction Company, Inc. j SEWERS • WATERMAINS • UTILITIES 'I 9600 EMPIRE WAY SCUTH ,r `i SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98118 (206) 722.5306 March 11, 1974 City of Renton Municipal Building 200 Mill Ave. So. Renton, Wash. 98055 Attention: Warren C. Gonnason, P.E. Public Works Director Gentlemen: ::n re: L.I.D. 273 Replying to your letter of March 8th regarding an extension of time to April 20, 1974, on our bid for the above; we are glad to be able to grant you this extension. However, we wish to advise you that in order to get delivery of the Ductile Ito- Pipe within the time allowed by the Specifications for this project, we went ahead on our own and ordered the pipe, also enabling us to hold the price as quoted. Very truly yours, FRANK COLUCCIO CONSTRUCTION COMPANY President. FC/ awr S 'I' , a PUBLIC wco: .3 NPT CITY Of i'.-JON } i e t i; F` L �Y Frank Coluccio Construction Company, Inc. SEWERS • WATERMAINS • UTILITIES 14 - 960E EMPIRE WAY SCUTF SE.ATTLE, WASHINGTON 98118 (206) 722-5306 February 21, 1974 t City of Renton Department of Public Works Renton, Wasninor,n f Gentlemen: In re: Sanitary Sewer L.1 D. 273 (Orillia) Pages 3 and 4 of the City of Renton Piano f-r the above project show an Inverted Siphon Airo.natc. Lo the Basic Bid. As you know, two iines cannot be laid -- one on a straight grade and one an inverted line. This would be doubling the work. If the Basic Bid is selected and Lhe line is laid on a straight grade, our bid stands as read. If you select the Inverted Siphon Alternate, our bid is $20,000.00, as read, for the complete Siphon from MHSA to MH6. Then you must deduct from our Basis Bid 222 l.f. of Items 9 and 10, amounting to $15,162.60-,making a net addition for the siphon of $4,837.40. Should you elect :o use the Alternate for the Inverted Siphon, our totals, based on the bid items, are as follows: Schedules 1 6 2 (Concrete) -199,161.16, incl. Sales Tax Schedules ) 6 3 (Ductile) $213,157.48 Incl. Sales Tax Schedulesl 6 4 (Plastic) $198,489.55 Incl. Sales Tax. We are writing this letter to point out the bid items and our totals for complete clarification. Very truly yours, FRANK COLUCCIO CONSTRUCTION COMPANY FC/awr President. Mardi 11 , 1074 k^ Puget Sound Power and Light Co. P.O. Box £a68 6ellevue, Washington 98009 Attention: Bill Arthur Gentlemen: Please revise easement description forwarded in March 6th letter as follows: "following described centerline; thence upon a line bearing South A9° 44' 2a" East'" . . . . . . Very trui,y yours, Warren C. Gonnason, F.E. Public Works Director ,ary 1;EC:mj Design Division { i March 6, 1974 !i Puget Sound Power and Light Company P.O. Box 868 Bellevue, WA 98009 Attention: Bill Arthur Gentlemen: Enclosed please find legal description of easement for the new San",tutu sewer tine crossing. (Re - LID 273) Please include in your easement the notification that no charges shall be levied against Puget Power by LID 273. 4elinqui0raa!nt from fomiee easement :io. 7202.340357 will oe forwarded to your office upon completion by the City Attorney. When nAw sanitary sewer easement is completed, please send two (2) copies fNv our review and execution. Very truly yours, :darren C. Gonnason, F.E. Public Works Director t`ary l_:--Cas3 __ .__.._ ..__.___ . _.__._. GEC:R,i Deign Division Enc. �p 4 `Ft � YR S i;�'ai�l.:T �S (: tnE lnit)r'SBC,ti�711 0'� the �4esterly lin,9 pf the Puget Sound Power and Light riq, t-cf-e:ay at tnL' Becher. ro linv comn 'o Sections 2Si and 3E, lmmsm,) ,3 north, 4 East, W.'t. , ther^c Southerly along trt;! '•'_Lcst line of said Puget Sov ,! "over and Light right-of-way :, tistanr_ of 641 .6•1 feet to the true Point of beginninq of the following descrlG?d centerline, t�enc: upon a line bearinq 8 t a distance of 170 feet to the Easterly margin of said right-of- riav, said line being the centerline of a t-m (10) foot permmnent easement anti a thirty (30) foot construction easement, all with- j in the cort)wpst one-quarter of Sec .ion .R, Township 23, range A East, 1 liarch Q, 1974 Frank Coluccio Construction Company, ioc. 9600 Empire 'Way South Seattle, Washington 94113 Re: L. I.D. 27" - Gentlemen: Pursuant to your conversation Friday, Marc`i 3, 1 )r4, with Dick Houghton relative to this project, we are requesting that you extend your bid prices to ' pril 20, 1974. We are requesting this extension to permit the City tine to consider the reorganization of the Local improvement District in response to requests from property owners within the district. A Public Hearin) is scheduled for April S. 1974 to further discuss the future of this district with the property owners. I shall contact you following this Public clearing to advise you of the status of the project. I ask that you ;)laase respond tv this request and indicate t/ letter your willingness to extend your bid arices to April ."-nth. Should you have any questions regarding this matter. please contact me at this office. Yours very truly, Warren C. Gonnason, P.E. Public Works Director 2. 61 i HouTc---__-. _._— RLH:mj Office Engineer 'larch F. 1974 Del dead, City Clergy. R. Lyman ;.cut.. Jffice Engineer Proposed L.I .:,. 275 Attached are t' v rmvised Exhibits "A" (legal description) "S" (pipe description) for proposed L.I.D. 4o. 285. Please destroy any previous exhibits you may have. AMN:pt) airs~ k - i , 1 t EXr;?BIT "A" RES,' I:o i E L. I.3. BEGINNING at the intersection of east margin of State Road 181 (West Valley Road) with the r-,rth line of the South one- half of the Southwest one-quarter of Section 25, Township 23 North, Range 4 Last, W.N. ; thence Southerly along said East margin of State Road 181 to the Nortn margin of Southwest 43rd Street (South 130th Street) ; thence Easterly along said North margin of Southwest 43rd Street to the East line of 'he 'lorthwest one-quarter, of the !forth- east nne-quarter of Section 3u, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.!!. ; thence Northerly along said Easterly line to North line of said Section 36, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.N. ; thence Westerly along said 'Northerly line to the Westerly margin of Puget Sound Electric Railway right-of-way; thence Northerly along said Westerly margin to the �lorth line of South one-half of the Southwest one-quarter of Section 25, Township 23 Urth, Range 4 East, W.1!. ; thence Westerly along said North line to the Easterly margin of State Road 161 and the point of beginning, ! 1 i EXHIBIT "B" Approx. Pipe Size On FROM TO 8" Pipe West Margin of Puget a point 300 feet to a point 150 Sound Electric Railway South of the North feet North of the Right-of-Way line of the South forth line of one-half of the Southwest 43rd Southwest one- Street quarter of Section 25, Township 23 North, Range 4, W.M. 8" Pipe On a line 150 feet West margin of To a point 771.5 'forth of 8 parallel Puget Sound Power feet West of West to S.W. 43rd 8 Light Co. right- margin of Puget of-way Sound, Power & Light Co. right-of way 10" Pipe A line 677 feet Borth West margin of Metro sAnhole R of the Nurth margin of Puget Sound 11-17 located 564 S.W. 43rd Street Electric Railway, feet 'North of the right-of-way North margin of S.W. 43rd Street 18" Casing A line 677 feet North West margin of V2 feet cast of of the North margin of Puget Sound thi East margin of S.W. 43rd Street Electric Railway Burlington Northe• right-of-way right-of-way i EXHIBIT "B" ��rvx_Pipe Size On FROM TO 8" Pipe Vest Margin of Puget a point 300 feet to a point 150 Sound Electric Railway South of the Worth feet worth of the Right-of-Way line of the South Worth line of one-half of the Southwest 43rd Southwest one- St�*eet quarter of Section 25, Township 23 North, Range 4, W.M. 8" Pipe On a line 150 feet West margin of To a point 771. 5 ;forth of S parallel nuget Sound Power feet West of West to S.W. 43rd & Light Co. right- margin of Puget of-way Sound, Power % Light Co. right-of way 10" Pipe A line 677 feet North West margin of Metro manhole R of the north margin of Puget Sound 13-17 located 564 S.W. 43rd Street Electric Railway feet 'forth of the right-of-way 7orth margin of S.N. 43rd Street 18" Casing A line 677 feet lorth West margin of 222 feet East of of the Worth margin of Puget Sound the East margin of S.W. 43rd Street Electric Railway Burlington Northern right-of-way right-of-way U °C I -- - --� ,AJO . w i \' lk i ti I r7-bj 1 IMN '1flld C '23' 440'VM" V,4 -p9V�W� (avow )3VI `13 0 lJ - - -- - -z+f- - -- t1 U J a -= a y 9 t e. . C1"Y OF RENTON NOTICE OF DISSOLLrION F PROPOSED LUCAL IMPROVEMENT DISTF.ICT, L.I.D. 273 AND INITIATION vh' NEW L,i,D. YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED, ::Pat the City Council of the City of Renton. Washington, at its regular meeting of March 4, 1974 has dissolved exist- ing Local Improvement District No. 273, Sanitary Sewers, Vicinity of S. W. 43ad Street and the East' Valley Highway. Said proceeding is hereby repealed and rescinded in its entirety and previous preliminary assess- ment notices are nullified and no longer in effect. The City Council, by Resolution No. 1d95, has declared ite intention to grant a new L._T.D., (proposed L.I.D. No. 285) with revised boundaries. New assessment roll is presentty being compiled and date cf April 8, 1974 has been fixed for hearing. You wit*,; be advised of Later action taken on the matter. CITY OF RENTON A � � a� Delcres A. Mead City Clerk i 7 7 r,. PUBLIC WORKS D,:PT CITY OF R"NTON RESOLUTION NO. 18.95 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RENTON , WASHINGTON , DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO CONSTRUCT AND INSTALL SANITARY SEWERS AND TRUNK LINES AND APPURTENANCES THERETO IN THE VICINITY OF S. W. 43rd STREET 5 WEST VALLEY HIGHWAY AS MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED HEREIN; AND TO CREATE A LOCAL ?MPROVEMENT DISTRICT TO ASSESS THE COST AND EXPENSE OF SAID IMPRCVEMENT AGAINST THE PROPERTIES IN SUCH DISTRICT SPECIALLY BENEFITED THEREBY; NOTIFYING ALL PERSONS WHO MAY DESIRE TO OBJECT TO SAID IMPROVEMENT TO APPEAR AND PRESENT T11EYR OBJECTIONS AT A MEETING OF THE CITY COPNCTL TO BE HELD ON APRIL 8 . th , 1974 . BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE. CITY OF RENTON , WASHINGTON, AS FOLLOWS : .SECTION I : That it is the intention of the City Council of the City of Renton , Washirgton, to construct and install the following sanitary sewer lines , including trunk lines , accessories and appurtenances thereto, in the following described area of the City , to wit : 1. (a) Description of Local Improvement District No. 285 As incorporated herein as per Exhibit "AT which is made a part hereof as if fully se _ forth. , (b) Improvements : '3 Approx. Pipe Size On From To See Exhibit "B" attached hereto which is incorporated herein. At-.�.dre... V There shall be included in the foregoing the acquisition and installation of all necessary valves , fittings , couplings , connectSons, equipment and appurtenances , and the acquisition of any easements , rights-of-way and land that may be required; and there shall further be included the performance of such work as may be incidental and necessary to the foregoing construction and installation . The City Council may, in its discretion , modify and amend the details of the foregoing described improvement , incliiding the financing thereof , where in its judgment it appears advisable , Provided such i modifications and amendments do not substantially alter the general plan of said improvement project. All of '-the foregoing shall be in i accordance with the plans and specifications therefor to be prepared i by the City Engineer of the City of. Renton. SECTION II : The entire cost and expense of said improvement, unless hereafter timely modified or amended by the City Council , sh .1 be b, . and assessed against the property specially benefited by such i.,.pi _ �e...ent to be included in the local improve•nent district to be established, embracing as near as may be all property sn>,{ ..Ily benefited by such improvement. There shall be included in the cost anc. expense of ,I said imp-ovements all cost items specified in RCW 35. 44 . 020. SECTION III : That all persons who may desire to object to the improvement herein described are hereby notified to appear and present such objections at a meeting of the City Council to be held in the Council Chambers of the City Hall , Renton , Washington , at 8 : 00 P. N. on April 8th 1974 , which time and place are hereby fixed for hearing all matters relating to said proposed improvement and all objections thereto and for determining the method of payment for said improvement . The City Clerk shall give notice of said hearing and said proposed improvement as required by law. A -2- s y .. SECTION IV: Warren Gonnason , Public Works Director , or his duly authorized representative, is hereby directed to sut.rit to the City Council , on or before the aforesaid hearing date , all data and information required by law to be submitted. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this 4th day of March 1974. Delores A. Mead, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR th; s 4th day of March 1974 . eery Gari3tt , Mayor -� Approved as to form: Gerard M. Shellan , City Attorney Publication Dates : 1st Notice: March 22 , 1974 2nd Notice: March 24, 1974 y i i i D i -3- IL s; EXHIBIT "A" RESOLUTION 1e�5 L. I .D. 285 ` i BEGINNING at the intersection of the east margin of State Rnad 181 (West Valley Road) with the north line of the South one- half of the Southwest one-quarter of Section 25, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M. ; thence Southerly along said East margin of State Road 181 to the North margin of Southwest 43rd Street (South 180th Street); thence Easterly along said North margin of Southwest 43rd Street to the East line of the Northwest one-quarter, of the North- east one-quarter of Section 36, Township 23 tior .h, Range 4 East, W.M. ; thence Northerly along said Easterly line to North line of said Section 36, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M. ; thence a Westerly along said Northerly line to the Westerly margin of Puget Sound Electric Railway right-of-way; thence Northerly a ' 7og said Westerly margin to the North line of South one-half of Lne Southwest one-quarter of Section 25, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M. ; thence Westerly alon3 said North line to the Easterly margin of State Road 181 and the point of beginning. � 4 M I EXHIBIT "B" Approx. Pipe Size On FROM TO 8" Pipe West Margin of Puget a point 300 feet to a porn* 150 Sound Electric Railway South of the North i �et Nortn of the Right-of-Way line of the South North line of one-half of the Southwest 43rd Southwest one- Street quarter of Section 25, Township 23 " North, Range 4, W.M. 8" Pipe On a line 150 feet West margin of To a point 771 .5 North of' & parallel Puget Sound Power feet West of West to S.W. 43rd & Light Co. right- margin of Puget y of-way Sound, Power & Light Co. rignt-of is way 10" Pipe A line 677 feet North West margin of Metro manhole R rf the North margin of Puget Sound 18-17 located 564 S.W. 43rd Street Electric Railway feet North of the right-of-way north margin of S.W. 43rd Street 18" Casing A line 677 feet North West margin of 222 feet East of of the North margin of Puget Sound the East margin of S.W. 43rd Street Electric Railway Burlington Northern right-of-w;-,• right-of-way INTEROFFICE MEMO To: Lyman Houk DATE : March 4, 1974 Office Engineer FROM: Gerard M. Shellan SUBJECT: L. i . '). 273 Dear Lyman: Thank you for the information you .orwarded to our office late Friday afternoon requesting the repeal of Local IMprovement District No. 273 which was commenced in June of 1971 and apparently has been dormant. Since you indicated that a contractor is holding up a recent bid for a certain number of days in connection with a new Local Improvement District covering a larger area than encompassed in LID 273, we are handing you herewith copies of an Ordinance repealing said proceeding and a Resolution for the new proposed Local IMprovement District . 4 We want to be sure that both the legal description and the proposed improvements have been �'crified in every respect. We also notice that the proposel cost of the new L. I. D. is over $100,000 more than L. I.D. 273, although, according to your mar, the change in area does not appear to be very substantial. We assume that you have discussed this with the proper owners involved and that they are agreeable to the increased costs and that you can show the corresponding benefits to the parcels involved. Copies of these documents are being sent to the members of the Legislation Committee and we would appreciate it if you or Mr. Gonnason would notify that Committee before tinight's meeting about your recommendations so as to avoid any delay or possibly lose a favorable bid. We remain, very jtmly yours , I f Gerard M. Shellan/ GMS: ds Enc. cc: Legislation Committee City Clerk (with originals) Pres. Council Mayor RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON , DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO CC�ONIiST�R,pU7CCTT AND 7,T{�`IINNSSgTTALL SANITARY SEWERS AND TRUNK 43rdE Str.N &�A'S�h1 ORE 1PA�T�C VL ARL Y O DESCRIBED HEREIN;IN xIgxx the vicinity Of S.W.W TO CREATE A LOCAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT TO ASSESS THE COST AND EXPENSE OF SAID IMPROVEMENT AGAINST THE PROPERTIES IN SUCH DISTRICT SPECIALLY BENEFITED THEREBY ; NOTIFYING ALL PERSONS WHO MAY DESIRE TO OBJECT TO SAID IMPROVEMENT TO APPEAR AND PRESENT THEIR OBJECTIONS AT A MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL TO BE HELD ON April Vr , 1974. BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF' RENTON, WASHINGTON, AS FOLLOWS : 1 SECTION I : That it is the itntention of the City Council of the City of Renton , Washington , to Z�Qtruct and install the following sanitary sewer lines, includi g unk lines , accessories and appurt- enances thereto, in the f to 1 g described area of the City, to wit: 1 . (a) Description al Improvement District. No. ' As inc p r d herein as per Exhibit "A" which is a rt hereof as if fully set forth. V (b) Improvements : Approx. Pipe Size On From To /See Exhibit "B" attached hereto which is incorporated herein. _1_ I There shall be included in the foregoing the acquisition and installation of all necessary valves , fittings , couplings , connections, equipment and appurtenances , and the acquisition of any --asements , rights-of-way and land that may be required; and there shall further ' be included the performance of such work as may be incidental and necessary to the foregoing construction and installation. The City Council may, in its discretion, modify and amend the 1 details of the foregoing described improvement , including the financing I i thereof, where in its judgmenti it appears advisable , provided such modifications and amendments do not substantially alter the general plan of said improvement project . All of the foregoing shall be in accordance with the plans and specifications therefor to be prepared by the City Engineer of the City of Renton. SECTION II : The entire cost and expense of said improvement , unless hereaftAr timely modified or amended by the City Council , shall be borne by and assessed against the property specially benefited by such improvement to be included in the local improvement district to be established, embracing as near as may be all property specially benefited by such improvement . There shall be included in the cost and expense of said improvements all cost items specified in RCW 35 . 44 . 020. SECTION III : That all persons who may desire to object to the improvement herein described are hereby notified to appear and present such objections at a meeting of the City Cou cil to be held in the Council Chembers of the City Hall , Renton, Washington , at 8 : 00 P. M. on April 1974 , which time and place are hereby fixed for hearing all matters relating to seid proposed improvement and all objections thereto and for determining the method of payment for said improvement. The City Clerk shall give notice of said hearing and said proposed improvement as required by law. -2- SECTION IV: Warren Gonnason , Public Wcrks Director, or his duly authorized representative, is hereby directed to submit to the City Council , on or before the aforesaid hearing date , all data and information required by law to be submitted. 1 PASSED BY THE CIT" 'OUNCIL this day of March 1974. Delores A. Mead, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of March 1974 . Avery Garrett, Mayor Approved as to form: Gerard M. Shellan, City Attorney Publication Dates : 1st Notice: 2nd Notice: i i 4 � EXHIBIT "A" RESOLUTION BEGINNING at the intersection of the east margin of State Road 181 (West Valley Road) with the north line of the South one-half of the Southwest one-quarter of Section 25, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M. ; thence Southerly along said East margin of State Road 181 to a point 120 feet North of the North margin of Southwest 43 rf S.tfeet (South 180th Street) ; thence Easterly along a line 120 feet No;t rly' of and parallel to .3aid North margin a distance of 820 feet, more or le s, to its intersection with the Wes`_ margin of Puget Sound Electric Railway ig t-of-way; thence Southerly 120 feet more or less to the North margif JJJ 43-d Street;thence Easterly along the North margin of said thLeq't: rd Street to the East line of the Northwest one-quarter, of the Nb heone-quarter of Section 36, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M.; ncett.erly along said Easterly line to North line of said Section 36, nship 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M.; thence Westerly along sated North ly a to the Westerly margin of Puget Sound Electric 1 Railway right- f ay; hence Northerly along said Westerly margin to the North + line of So th e half of the Southwe'>t one-quarter of Section 25, Township 23 North, Rang 4 t, W.M.; thence Wesrerly along said North line to the Easterly mar of StaY, Road 181 and the point of beginning. i i EXHIBIT "B" Approx. Pipe Size On FROM TO S 8" Pipe West Margin of Puget a point 300 feet to a point 150 feet Nort Sound Electric Railway South of the North of the North line of Right-of-Way line of the South Southwest 43rd Street. one-half of the Southwest one- quarter of Section 25, Township 23 North, Range 4, W.M. 10" Pipe A line 677 feet North West margin of Metro manhole R 18-17 of the North margin of Puget Sound located 564 feet North S.W. 43rd Street Electric Railway of the North margin Right-of-way of S.W. 43rd Street 18" Casing A line 677' North of the West margin of 222 feet East of i North margin of S.W. 43rd Puget S',und the East margin of f Street Electric Railway Burlington Northern Right-of-Way Right-of-Way. I , 1 1 --ITY OF RENTON, WAS3INGTON ORDINANCE NO . All ORDINANCE OF THE. CITY OF RENTON , WASHINGTON REPEALING RESOLUTION NO. 1745 AND ORDINANCE NO. 2647 RELATING TO LOCAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT "'0. 273 AND RESCINDING SAID PROCEEDING IN ITS Eid'LIRETY IL THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS : SECTION I : Resolution No. 1745 passed and approved by the City Council on June 7 , 1971 and Ordinance No. 2647 passed and approved on July 26 , 1971 relating to the establishment of a Local Improvement District, known. as Loc..l Improvement District No. 273 for the installation of certain sanitary sewer lines and appurtenances in the vicinity of S.W. 43rd St. and West Valley Highway is hereby repealed and rescinded in its entirety. SECTION II : The Director of Public Works is hereby authorized and directed to prepare the necessary data for the establishment of a new Local Improvement District for the installation of sanitary sewer 1 lines in the v�.cinity of S. W. 43rd St. and West Valley Highway , which said District will encompass different territories and boundaries than the forn.er Local Improvement District No. 273 . SECTION III : This Ordinance shall be effective from and after its passage and approval and five days after its legal publication. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of March, 1974 . Delores A. Mead , City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAY)R this day of March, 1974. Avery Garrett , ayoF3 r Approved as to form: �erard M. Shellan , City Attorney Date of Publication : IPUBLIC WOM CO&II-1'EH RR"T March 4, 1974 .V,-;EJBCT, L.S.D. 213 3 The Public works Cwmmittee }aa rwiewec a report tr= the tublic works i Director recommending that sanitary sever L.I.D. 27a, located in the vicinity of Southwest Ord and the Pleat Valley Highway, be dissolved, and that a rssolution be passed by tbs City Council declaring the City intsr.c to create a now sanitary sower L.I.D. with amended boundaries to serve the area. The intent of theme actions would be to change the L.Z.D. boundaries to include all properties which would benefit from the construction of the sow: &yin. This action would establish a new pubic hearing on a nsw preliminary assessment roll and 4Qthor1ss now notices be sent to the property owners. Two contractors who have submitted the lowest bid for this project have apreeo to hold their paices for 60 days to accmr )late time delay. The Public works Ciayittes thezeforw reoamands that, BaistLnq L.:..D. 273 be dissolved. z. A resolution be rammed croat Lng A new L.I.D. and scheduling a new public nearing April 8, 1974. Ken Bruce, Chairnsn T- William Grant envy Srchellert .I i Renton City Council Meeting 'i/4/74 - Page 3 p OLD BUSINESS Public Safety CcmucitteP Chairman OF .re lLi s'. t.mltti•d cq^hr^ittee h Police Guild report which noted meeting with t`^- R­ h „r t'oIi•..r •.u , 1rl ,r. Bill of Rights negotiations, sarani 'tinq "Pi" of i , t, i, 1 air : .:-d 'oun it concurrence in Sallie, dSking that i.l 1' an addendum to the existing contra< i no r e I o t _ 'i •a rh- committee hav l rig already negotia trl i,v...wt , �t,a!,f :5 , uid riot feel a resolution necessary; anci fur;- l_: A" ti,- :);", 1I tee has already recarnmended that all emplo;nr•. ^ Lhin '.�Y RPntor. Police Department shall be cntit. ,d to thr pr„t• . .rir 'Ie 10 11 of Rights." MOVED BY ',RANT, SECONDr_C BY "4 <1NTI , COUNCIL : ONCUn IN RECOMMENDATION (it PUBLIC SAFETY i.CA1A1 1.1 LL- . Suh, I ,tite motion failed which was oridP by Stredicke, _,e ,I,•_I_o I,y :chrhlert, teat this be referred to the Legislation Committer- c,1d City Att.orr,ey to report back next week. MOVED BY SCHELLERT , St '. %.)EP Br :It! 'jRENTi , PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE REPORT BE AMENDED iuy FOR THE WORD "DEPARTMENT!' (Report tt—•I r ri:,tcgee; , In the Renton Police Guild shall be cnti , 'ed 'n _h_ orote: t ., " the Bill of Rights . ; Following discu M011,)% CArPlcu. Cho- man Grant requested reading of the Bil.l et Rights an..; 11,,,iussiull v resolution ensued. llotion as amended, CAi'RIEO. MOVE!) Bi ;RANT, SECONDED BY DELAURENTI , COUNCIL AUTHORi-'E M",YOR AND CIT_I Cct-'K TO SIGN ADDENDUM. CARRIED. Central Business Community Services Committee Chairmar, Gr.i�,t submittr•c ro^:nitte District Project report,for informational purposes, re :nec•tir.q 1r92 wit! reDrP�erti- i Progress tives of Parifir Northwest Bell , iugr•t 1.I -ino Pn„r•r h Report Penton Downtown Merchants, along with Adr,nnist^ation; d' whicn time the power and phone companies dssu ed tc:• "jo their best" to removed the overhead wiring and power p,. lts in the next two weeks . The report noted Downtown Merchants Rep, Mr. Tory Porr :': lo, urged those involved to expedite completion, the two weeks pr±or to the Easter holidays being critical pP1 ;L'd - mor.harts; S9 Project Manager King assured the connaiu,,e th.it ..e�_ '.'oar.t E rctrlc i would install all light poles in the r.enir;l busiiiey, district _y + March 15, 1974. Community Services Chairman Grant also noted fin.il ^^" draft of Ad Hoc Committee on Signs sent to committee members and to ..- Legislation Committee. ! Dissolutior L. I .D. 273 - Sewers Public Works Committee Member Schellert presented committee report W. 43rd/Orillia that the committee reviewed report from the Public Works Directo, recanmending L. I .U. 273 be dissolved and that d resolution be adopted by the Council delcaring intent to create a new sanitary 1 sewer L. I .D.,with amended boundaries,which would include all proper- I ties benefitting from the construction of the sewer main locateU in ` R the vicinity of S.'.i. 43rd St. and vJest Valley Highway . Th> rub- 1 lic Works Committee recommet. ad that (1 ) Existing L. I .D. 273 be dissolved, (2) A resolution be adopted creatirig a new L. I .D. and scheduling a public hearinq April 8, 1974. MOVED BY PERRY, SECONDED BY SCHELLERT, COUNCIL CONCUR IN RECOMMLNDATIOM OF THE PUBLIC WORKS j COMMITTEE AND REFER MATTER TO THE LEGISLATION COMMITTEE. MOVED BY 1 Public Hearing STREDICKE, SECONDED BY SCHELLERT, AMEND MOTION, THAT Tur PUBLIC 1 April ed WORKS DEPARTMENT INCLUDE THAT PROPERTY FRONTING ON S.W. u3RC STR' ET Proposed L. I .D.L. . IN THE PROPOSED L . 1 . D. . AND THAT 1HIS PROPOSED L . I .D. f�E REFFERRFD rillia TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION FOP, COMMENTS Ai THE PUBLIC HEARING. t"OitO^i CARRIED. MOTION AS AMENDED, CARRIED. (See later Ordinances. ) NEW BUSINESS Motion failed which was made by Stredicke, seconded by Schellert, Councilman Grant act as recording secretary rather than City Clerk at Special Meeting Special Meeting of Council on March 7. Upon inquiry by Stredicke, March 7, 1974 City Attorney advised that transaction of the business of the joint meeting would bf� made available to the other jurisdictions participating Taxi Rates MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY PERRY, THE SUBJECT OF DI`1CCVNT RATES FOR SENIOR CITIZENS FOR TAXI FARES BE REFERRED TO THE COMMUNITY SER- VICES-COMMITTEE. Possible 25% reduction in fares with plan similar to City's sewer and water rates for Senior Citiens, was noted. MOTION CARRIED. Renton City Council Meeting 3/4/74 - Page 4 VOUCHERS FUR APPnOVAL Vouchers finance and Personnel Corrifttee Chairman Scre', lert submitrod #2049 - 205' Voided report reconm(-nding payment ^f Warrant,, )F'+ trr.ur,, rl + t in 2058 - 2138 OK the amount of $4b,4o5.14 h vim, n:ce'vui :eparGme (.: `1 _a- tion that r,ercbandicp amid or Serv,res n7 I beer, I,("^ 'V�l Or rendered, Wa-rants No. 2J49 t'irituah ;Oil l;av`nG beer, i„�,y voided. IMP"ID 91• SCHELLER1 E:-A; Rt.4� : , AP: 1+• k` BE n( DprVED �C•r PA0-INT. CARIli-U. irafriC Sly:,d ' ira,i5;:]i i,a llili I.CA'illi tte� :.' .1 �1.•.'. � '� y ,oted, YO' N.3rd 6 honterey purp:,ses , that trafiIL light at N.3tu end Mnnter,., )y .- • 1 would in operation try the end of March; Dlars as pre.-a ei 'ra`fic Engineering were reviewed and reco miemied for approv4i . uROINANCES Legislation Committee Chairman Stredicke presented z^ ordirionce relating to Ccrrmittees ,f the City CGunCil wh'Ch has n,?er C ared on Ordinance +Y28s4 `irst reading 2/25, expanding the Legislaticr Cz rm+'°re to ­i: utte XrFending �ounc 1 Inter-Governmertal �., rairs and estabi.shiirg a Crr•: t r,, m, ;,✓ietion. Committees and recommended ordir inc e be ;iaced on second arc final e631rgs . Following reading by the Clerk, it was MOVED BY r:0'4r , By SCHELLERT, ORDINANCE BE ADOPTED AS READ. Roll Cal . : STREDICKE, PERRY, SCHELLERT . NO: DELAURENTI . M07I11 Ordioanc- Lc•ei;?arion Cormitrc_e Chairman Stredicke presentedl sta rg-- relating to time ano place of Reyular, Special ac' ".', : `+ + Regular ..:r i the Whole" CGUniil 'leetings, estab",hind the '1 'nu''s9.ry Special Meetings month, excrat Jan, ; ry and November,a, _Special o. Lrxm (toe or of City Council the Whole" nieetingsin addition to Regular Meetings an tht tint four Mondays of each month and updated City Code by provisions of the Open Meeting A, t. Ordinance placed on first r. a.lin., Committee Chairman recommended second ant final rce,7 ^•:>. wing reading of the ordinance, it was MOVED BY ;CHELLERi , S ' ti4Ji.:: br SCHELLEPT, SECONL'EG BY DELAURENTI , ORDINA' 'E BE ADG'rr;i 11S REAv. ROLL CALL: All Ayes. MOTION CARRIED, ORDINANCE ADOP'CD. Ordinance 02836 Legislation Committee Chairman Stredicke presented an orci+,anre for Cancelled D-273 first reading which repealed Resolution No. 17a5 and Ordinance No. Sewers in Area of 2.647 relating to Local Improvement Dist -4 ct No. 273, Sanitary Sewers S.W. 43rd and in S.W. 43rd St. (Orillia) ,and rescinding said proceeding in its West Valley Hwy. entirety. Following reading, it was MOVED P" SCHELLERT, SECONDED BY PERRY, ORDINANCE BE ADVANCED TO SECOND ANDFINmL READING. CARRIED. Followinn_ reading of ordinance(see earlier Public works Committee report) , it was MOVED BY SCHELLERT, SECONDED BY GP,ANT, ;'70UNCTL ADOPT ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL : Ail Ayes. ORDINAN: F ADOPTED. i First Reading Legislation Ch irman presented an ordinance for first ^?ad;oq relat- Proposed Ordinance ing to the membership, duties and organization of the Boare cf Board of Public Works. MOVED BY SCHELLERT, SECONDED BY PERRY , CONCUR IN P-,blic Works RECOMMENDATION OF THE LEGISLATION COMMITTEE CHAIRMAN ANC. 'LACE THE ORDINANCE ON FIRST READING. CARRIED. Following reading of the ordinanc creating and establishing a Board of Public Works , it was MOVED 6 DELAURENTI , SECONDED BY GRANT, ORDINANCE _ . REFERRED BACK TO THE LEGISLATION COMMITTEE. CARRIED. RESOLUTIONS Resolution, 01895 Legislation Committee Chairman Stredicke presented a resolution for Dec Tar�ng—Tnient adoption which declared the City's intent to construct amid install L. I.D. 285 sanitary sewers in the vicinity of S.W. 43re St. 6 Wiest Valley Hwy, Sanitary Sewers and to create a tocai .mprovenent distric t, L. I .D. 285, establishing S.W. 43rd April N, as Public Hearing date. MOVED BY SCHELLERT, C•ECONDED BY STREDICKE, ,DOPT RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED. (See earlier action) Resolution #1896 Legislation Chairman presented resolution, recommending adoption, 3jrp,us quipment declaring certain signz ' poles and equipment as surplus ana a izing the Purchasing Agent to advertise for bids on "as is" ba is f surplus items. Following reading of the resolution, i! was MOVED BY DELAURENTI , SECONDED BY STRCDICK, , RESOLUTION BF Abt • i!D AS READ. CARRIED. Mayor Garrett, Councilmen Stredicke, Schellert and Gelaurefit� reports- unable to attend next ,meeting as will be out or town. '10' D ay ADJOURNMENT STREDICKE, SECOND PEkRY, MEETING ADJOJRN CARRIED. Adjo rnment at 11 :10 P.M. Delo s "_ad -_L1 y I f� e s t N c i i> n February 28, 1974 Ken Sruc<, "iai rn n 1emuers of 0_ iVcli( r�_ tCcr: Sentl urnen: Five Lids '•,ave aen receiyett for t. te ,,r,structio.r of `Ivli *ar„ cover LlD 173 in the 3rillia area. Frank con,^aa, sas SUtrm;tt?d t+?a bid on Parh of the nine alt j'r000seu: Schedule 1 - Cuncrete. - :wctile Iron P'Y'If,,3.7 , (Plastic) 1"1,31-i.77 Copies of the bid ta!xilation sheet are attached for ,your information. The bids were reviewed 11th the property owners withic the L.1 .6, Thursday, February 21st. In view 0� thz bid prices rece' .ed and the reused locatiin, of the ?wer main, the �mkperty owners have rtauesto<i t,iat tie L.I.D. boundaries be enlarged to include additional properties that could be sewed by the "we r -)roject. Since the present L.I.O. uoundaries cannot legally to Enlarged, the existing district would have to be dissolved and a new district created with the enlarged boundaries. After reviewing As matter we recomexmd that tF, Counc .l dissolve L. I. O. 273 and initiate a resolution declaring its intent to creste a new 'M with amended boundaries. Such a procedure would reggire x, prYximateiy 60 days, during which time a new preliminary assessment ,roll waull be prepared and new notices sent to the )roperty owners. de �.kluld also reouest the low bidder to hold his prices for the 60 day period. We he-e crepe :! various exhibits for your reviQ;, ✓,, .issist .tou in your consideration of this matter. This approach appears %c be the best way to complete this long-pending )roject. `Je-Y truly yours, i'u:lic ;iorks 'hector RLH:mJ Attach. , : a kl EXHIBIT "B ' !lpProx._ Iiae Size Or F'.;'_rq 7, r Jest '4arnin of �hnret e Point 3?1 xeet to ,mint 15rl foot Yorth 'ound _leitric :ailwav ',,ut.h of zoe forth of the 9orto line of ,ight-of-Way line of the South soutmiest 43rd Street. one-half of the Southwest one- quarter of Section . 5, 7ownship 23 north, Ranne 4, 10" Pipe A line C77 f,- orth West wirain of lctro manhole R 13-17 of the ':orth margin of Puget Sound located 564 feet tlorth °,.;.. 4Ard '�treef. Electric Railway of the lo-rth margin Right-of-way of S.W. 43rd Street 13" Casing line G77' forth of tre West margin of 2%? feet Cast of 'iorth argin of S 43rd Puget Sound the Mast marqin of Street Electric ac,ilwav ❑rlington Northern fight-of-slay Right-of-Way, I BURUNGTON NORTHERN 8�0 Central B�Ajing INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AND SeattIe, b%a,liington9HI0: PROPERTY MANAGEMENI DEPARTMFNT Tele,hune i20u, 6�41900 Engineering Department February 26, 197 City of Renton Municipal Building 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 9F,OSS Gentlemen: Please refer to he proposed construction of a sewer line across Burlingt( Northern and Glacier Park Company pro- pertiesnear Sout 43rd, Renton. l Permits Nos. 209 ,442 and 209,443 from the Burlington Northern 'i iand Glacier Park Company, respectively, are enclosed herewith sl in duplicate providing for the location of these facilities. I If you find the permits satisfactory to the City, will you please execute both instrum nts in duplicate and return to this office as quickly a: possible. If early occupancy is desired, we will eitler attempt to get the permits executed on behalf of the issuing companies or will give advance authority to take possession ending issuance of the permits. Please advise whatever you wish. Sincerely, J. J. GORDON Aanager - Froperty Management 7 , v By: d.M. Boyd Assistant 14"agar� Property Management i EZcs. RMB: ek i FEB P7 ia74 i ;I PUBLIf' W') :PT CITY OF R"JfON i rsr The Applicant or Lessee shall not 9,�sct any structure or do any corstruction work on the premises covered by this agreement until the duplicate counterpart thereof, duly executed by the Railway Company, ;hakl have been delivered to :tint, unless special per- mission is given by the Railway Company's superintendent. PIPE LINE No.: 209,442 Case: THIS AGREEMENT, entered into this 19tit day of February, 197 between SL1ItLZNCTON NOP.TfI.�RN INC. hereinafter called the "Railway Company," and CITY OF RENTON wnose post olhoe address is Municipal Bldg. , 200 Mill Ave. So., Penton, Wa. 93055 ".,reinafter called the"Applicant", WITNESSETH: for each 5-yr.poriod The Railway Company, for an, aideration of the sum of twenty-five andno/1CO Jolt:irs ($25.00)/ paid by the Applicant on the execut3,... and deR:ery hereof, the receipt wh, •of is hereby ael.nowlodged,and of the eovenarts and promisee hereinafter made to be observed and performed by Lb,- Applicant, does hetgby grant to the Applicant license and permission to excavate for,construct, maintain and operate a surer undercrossin,: hereinafter re:,--ed to as the"facility," across the right of way of the Railway Company underneath the surface thereof, and under the trae&s of its railway at or near Orillia Station, in the County of King State of llashin,toa , to be 1-MW as follows,to-wit: At survey station 974+53.4 as shoert in detail on the attached print, mar:ccd inhibit "All, dated Feb. 8, 1974 , attached hereto and Lade a part hereof. i The Applicant in consideration of such lioanse and pezzab a 1, hereby covenants and promises as follows: 1. The Apoi.eant at Applicant's sole cost and expense,shall excavate for,construct, maintain and repair tke facility. The Applicant shall fill in the..acavation, and restore the sudsee of the ground to its previous condition. Ali of the work shall be dono under the direction and subject to the approval of the Suoerw.endeat of the division of the Railway Company upon which thn facility is located. 2. The Applicant, when required so to do by the Railway Company, at Applicant's sole cost ana expense, shall change the location of and reconstruct the facility, to permit and accommodate changes of (trade or ahpme. and (1 improvement in or additions to the fac lities of the Railway Company doing all work in Bonne,tion therewith rider the direction and subject to the approval of the said Superintendent. 3. The Applicant small give to the said Superintendent due notice of dry work to be done by the Applicant in the wavation, consLue:ion,maintenance,repair,change of location or removal of the facility, and shall conduct such work in such manner as not to mteifere with the maintenance and operation of the railway of the Railway G;mran; C In the event that the Railway Company, at the request of the Applicant, or for the protection of it- property ar,' deratious, doe` any work, furnisbe+ tiny mutenal ur flagging service,or incurs any expense whatsoever on account of the excavation for, canstruction, maintenance, repair, change of location, or removal of the facility, the Applicant abaa: reimburse the Railway Company fi,r the c-*t thereof wither 'wenty (20) days after hills are rendered therefor. ! 1 7, :ZI 1 � 1 '.f Z3 (AI End Spur } uc :a,.0 �/� _LA rr�' P4:K I CG. _PROGEPTY__ Z HAC S.IV. TEMP CC'NST. EMPMNST PERMIT ;r„ -54k"TAIFY S[✓IZ:P PERMIT ba -PERWONT EASEMENT (EASEMENT I 9 E.N.I. pknvfkTY __ 1 C 1J."I --MIL I Pkl1°fRTY I I I I DE7A/L �33T.0 o le. � ftP�e- h4-ee I J o Po fasamant io Sierne{{ w •D o' fe Da*" 80* ,POAD Y ' sr?I l' 1 1 •, sz - �• r MICA. P.COPFery • B.N./. Dpopjc:?T -------- ... w u%A Y I o� -- mill\i7ISIT ~A7 ' ' I ,.,, 5./✓./° 171. REG, ?iv SE471Z T,'C,71'Tk'a�l; OF&/ 1A I VIA- 3 EASEMENT TO CITY OF PEN TON Fni FROPD :.�'. SZ ER LINE UIVOfkChOSSI"'S l•A' 1i1F If I s EASEMENT sNOH'N: �� I! II Lq - TEMP. COAST PERMIT SAIOWN- 5. The Applicant shall and hereby does release and discharge the Railway Company of and from any and all lia- bility for damage to or destruction of the facility or any c ther property of the Applicant upon the premt+es of the Rail- way Company in connection with the excavation for,con:buctico, maintenance,change of location,Opel atirn or remov- A of the facility. The Applicant shall assume, and bereb-does assume, all risk of and liability for any and all injury to or death of the Applicant while upon the right of way o the Railway Company in connection with the cxcavati n for, i construction,maintenance, change of location,operation or removal of the f:rLility. The Applicant .hall and hereby does further agree to indemnify and hold harmless the Railway C.mpany of and from any and all i'sbility, damages, I v- eries,judgments,costs,expenses,or other charges and demands on account of injury to or death of one or more persons, or damage to or destruction of the property of one or more persons,resulting front a, luring the construction,existence, maintenance, change of location,operation or removal of the facility. The Applic n' further agrees to appear an,' Is- fend in 6he name of the Railway Company any suits or actions at law brought against the Railway Company on account of any such personal injuries, death or damage to property, and to pay and satisfy any final judgment that may be ren- dered against the Pailway Company in any such sr:t or action. The liability assumed by the Applicant herein shall not be affected or diminished by the fact,if it be a fact, that any such suit or action brought against the Railway Company may striae in thole or in part out of the negligerwe of the Railway Company, its officers, scents, servants or employes, or be contributed to in whole or in part by such negiig,enc . Notwithstanding the foregoing, nothing herein coa- tained is to be eaoatyad as as indemilication against the sole negligariM of Railway Compal I 6. The Applicant shall not transfer or aasigr this license and permission without tho written consent of the Itailws} t Company. 'Kb officers, aslployaes or agai 7. Nothing herein co,teined shall imply or irl a covenant on the part of the Railway Company for quiet enjoyment. 8. It is expressly understood and agreed that the Railway Company may at any time cancel and termina•e this, license and permission by giving to the Applicant thirty (30) days notice in writing of its intention to cancel the earne and at the expiration of such notice this license and permission shall terminate. upon receipt of such notice and before the expiration thereof,the Applicant,under the supervision and direction of the sr id Superintendent,or someone designated by him,shall remove the facility from the right of way of the Railway Company o. ' estore the right of way and premises of the Railway Company to such condition as shall be approved by the said Superh......,lent. If the Applicant shall fail to remove the facility and restore the said right of vay to such approved condition by the time of expiration of the said notice,the Railway Company at its option fur, remove the same and restore the said right of way to its previous condition, and the Applicant shall pay the n<t and expeuet thereof to the Railway Company. 9 Upon any failure of the Applia.et punctually and strictly to observe and perform the covenants and promises made herein,the Railway Company may terminate this agreement on ten (10) days notice to the Applicant, remove the facility,and restore the right of way to its previous condition at the cost and a-penes of the Applicant 10. Any notices given under the provisions of this agreement shall be goc d if deposited postpaid in a United States postoffice addressed to the Applicant at Applicant's post office addrew above tated. 11. Subject to the foregoing provisions, this agreement and all of the covenants and promises thereof, shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon the executors,administrators,succeesc,3 and assigns of the parties. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Raflway Company and the Applic: have executed tuis agreement the day and year first above written. in presence of: 31ALIhi T01 fAZMW W. ------------ -_ _. By.......... .. ....... ..................-- .........................._._ ...._ ....---------------..-...._.._. 9sste ■r+� - -..__....-- -•----.._.. __ - - _........ ....... ....�'t! n!. 1tE......M.._..-------._._._.._.._.._...• --- --......... NY: --.__.. _. _.... - —--- — - -— . _...-- - ......-----. Actaatt ' PRO $67 11.69 2 •etitRY IN a...A. i CONSTRUCTORS - PAMCO 1ci.nt Vrnturem. Pac,Bc Medlar'.ca: Gnstrunor.. .'..ant.uaors Paa Gc C>mca— S !!Ir. W4,4,np 3600 r REMONT AVENUE NORTH — 6335774 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 9S1C3 ems: February 21, 1974 Mr. Warren C. C-onnason, F E. Public Wnrks Director City of Renton Municipal Building, 200 Mill Ave. So. Renton, Washington 9E055 Reference: Sanitary Sewer L.I.D. 273 Dear Mr. Gonnason: Yesterday we discussed with you on the telephone regarding the awarding of L.I.D. 273. This letter is to put those conversations in writing so that you can give them further thought at your leisure. Constructors-Pamw is the lore bidder on L.I.D. 273, as the attached bid totals show. -he second bidder omitted the siphon alternate from his bid total. This made the total wrong on the bid documents. We lmder- stand he is attempting to further change the bid, either verbally or by letter. We are told he is instructing the City to deduct certain bid items from his bid. This, of course, would be illegal. :"he bid numbers must speak for themselves. It is in the City's best interest to award the contract to Constructors- Pamco who is the low bidder. The siphon can be built or eliminated at the City's option. It is an alternate .ncluded in the total bid. Constructora-Pamco's bid is the cheapest overall bid,under any condition, to the City. Bid Items 4, 5 and 6, fcr gravel items, are expected to underrun. Under Constructors-Pamco's bid a saving of $20,000 to $30,000 can be made on the project. The second bidder's savings would be only a maximum of $260. Please study the attached two analysis sheets. You will note that the least cost to the City will. result if the job is awarded to Censtructors- Pamco, the low bidder. ;instructors-Pamco looks forward to working with you on this project. Very truly yours, CONSTRUCTORS-PAMCO z KCH/jn Itiith Encl. 2 4 R CONSTRUCTORS-PAI Attachment #1 Sanitary Sever L.I.D. 273 C1ty of Renton t Constructors- Pamco Coluccio Total - Sch. 1 $190,090.00 83.717.00 Total - Sch. 2 7,351.00 1W,582.50 Siphon Alternate 4,972.00 20,000.00 Sub-Total 202,413.00 204,299.50 5.3Z Sales tax 10,727.89 10,827.87 Total - Conc. Pipe 213,140.89 215,127.37 Total - Sch. 1 190,090.00 83,117.00 Total - Sch. 2 22,494.00 113,874.36 Siphon Alternate 4,972.00 20,000.00 Sub-Total 217,556.00 217,591.36 5.3Z Sales Tax _L1,530.47 11,532.34 Total - D. I. Pipe 229,086.47 229,123.70 Total - Sch. 1 190.090.00 83,717.00 Total - Sch. 2 7,451.00 99,944.70 Siphon Alternate _4s07-).00 20,000.00 Sub-Total 292, j.00 203,661.70 5.3" Sales Tax _10,733.19 10,794.07 Tots) - PVC Pipe 213,246.19 214,455.77 Attachment 12 CONSTRUCTORS--AMCO Analysis of Bid Items 4, 5 and 6 j Sanitary Sewer L.I.D. .73 I City _ Rerton Cons t ruc to rs- _ PAMCO Coluccio 4. Foundation Material, Ballast 3W f. 5.00 $13,000. .02 $60.00 5. Bedding Gravel 2000 T. 4.00 8,000. .02 40.00 6. Select Trench Backf:.11 8000 cy 1.00 8,000. .02 160.00 TOTALS $31,000. $260.00 NOTE: 1. The designers of this project have indicated that the gravel iteme are set up high to be sure that all contingencies are covered. 2. It is very likely that little or no gravel will be used for Items 4 and 6. This could result in a savings to the C}.ty of Renton of $23,000 under Constructors-Panto bid, but only a savings of $220 under the Coluccio bid. 3. The City of Renton will get the job at the lowest cost by awarding to Constructors-Famco. Constructors-Panto is the low bidder on the total job. The siphon can be built or not built at the City's option, since it is an alternate. It is in the City's best interest to award this project to the lowest b.,dder, 1onstructors-Pamco. CONSTRUCTORS - PAMCO loin WM.101r. Paalfic Mechanical Ccmnectors, Inc. and Lonso-vc wrx-°a<rf:c Compeny, Swe•tla N'asM ngtnn 1 3600 F. _MONT AVENUE NORTH—633 5774 SEATTLE• WASHINGTON 98103 t February 27, 1974 Mr. W. C. Gonnason Public Works Director City of Renton Municipal Building Renton, Washington 98055 Reference: Sanitary Sever L.I.D. 273 Dear Mr. Gonnason: This is to confirm that we will hold our bid good for an additional sixty days from the date that it would normally expire. Very truly yours, CONSTRUCTORS-PAMCO Keith C. Howell KCH/yn MLL- - z - 5 . Legal dpacription (if lengthy , attach as separate sheet ) 7 . Area ___._Dimensions 8. Intended use of property or project ( include details : num�ar of units . volume , COMMEPG7Q�- - 5AwiTQ,cy Scwc�P_S ' i 9 . Generally describe the property and existing improvements : I - III i 10. Total construction cost or fair .ark �t value of r 1 project including additional developmen , s cot,templated : �6 r A/i� 11 . Construction dates (montt and year) for which permit is requested : 7 J Begin Cz-'�, End I`A � -D i