The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutWWP2700374(4) -374 W Ken ale Interce for-SEPA Pxoces _ 1 BEGINNING FILE TITLE �,3 7 OF FILE 7 1 R ry t,L CITY OF RENTON MEMORANDUM DATE: December 12, 1989 TO: Jennet Samek-McKague. Senior Planner FROM: � Ronald 1. Olsen, Water Utilav Supervisor SUBJECT: SEPA rexiew requirement for W, Keanydale Sanitary Sewer Trunk Maio The Water Utility requests that an exemption be granted for the aforementioned project for the following reasons. 1. It is normally exempt from Sepa review because it is an 8' utility. 2. It is exempt from the tree cutting ordinance 3. The reason it maybe required is because it is in the APA Zone ' area and it is considered a sensitive area. One of the main reasons for this project is to make ;anitary sewers available so that the aquifer can be protected. It will also provide sanitary sewer service to new well 5A. It should also be noted that the poliev stated in the proposed Aquifer Protection Ordinance (APA) for Zone •2 is that new residential development be required to connect to a central sewer s)stem. It also requires ne-v storm and sanitary sewers be constructed to the satisfaction of the Utility such that no water infiltration and;or exfiltration shall occur. 4. Finally it is the Water Utility that will make the review of the APA sensitive area issues for this project as well as proposing the project you can be assured that these issues have already been addressed. Attached to this memo for your review is the Abbreviated Environmental Review Checklist for the aforementioned project. Fir Aile �,, ski —W r CITY OF RENTON (OMNIUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ABBREVIATED ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW CHECKLIST FOR r PROJECTS BELON' SPECIFIED SEPA EXEMPTION LEVELS The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), Chapter 43.22IC, RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider 'he environmental impacts of a proposal before makiig decisions. Although the State Environmental Policy Act does specify certain categorical exemptions, these can, in some cases, be modified by local agencies if there is a likelihood of probable significant adverse impacts from an otherwise categorically exempt project. Although the SEPA rules do not generally require environmental documentation when a project is categorically exempt, many smaller projects are, in fact, a part of a larger whole which is not exempt. Also, sder recent guidelines issued by the Washington State Department of Ecology, it is recommended that agencies reviewing projects show that SLPA was considered. This would be consistent with a 1980 State Court of Appeals decision which held that agencies should consider likely environmental effects before applying the SEPA categorical exemptions The City of Renton has developed the attached abbreviated checklist to assist in doing this. Please answer each question and attach your answers on additional pages if you need more space. A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of Applicant c'.1'fY OF RENTON 2.a. Address and phone number of applicant 200 Mill Avenue So., Renton, WA 98055 235-2631 2.b. Address and loMion of the subject site N.E. 24th St- to N.E. 27th St. parallel to SR 0405 3, pate checklist prepared Nov, 5, 1989 J.a. Is this proposed action related to an existing structure or activiw on or in the immediate vicinity of the sabiect site? lbs. Well PS Pump (louse S Existing Dry Sanitary Sewers 4.b. Do You have any plans for future addition expansion. Or further activity related to our connected to 'his project? No 5. List any governmental approvals or permits Thal will be needed for Your proposal, if known City of Renton, Utility Constr. Permit, Pranehiue from DOT to operate c.ain'In #405 R/W. 6. Please give a brief_complete description of Your proposal ncluding existing uses on the subject site the proposed uses_ the amount of any aradina or filling !in cubic Yards), and the size of the oroiect and site in situate feet. Installation of 8" Sanitary Sewer which will service new Well NS Pump House and Connect existing dry sewers in APA Zone 02. 7, Location of proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of Your proposed pro iect. including a street address, See 2(h) L ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Are there any surface indications or history of unvable soils in the immediate vicinity? Yes x No; If so, Rr'ieriLy describe -- 2. Could erosion occuLas a result of clearing, construction or the proposed use, _Yes x No; ILL, generally describe. 3. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion. or other impact to the earth. if any An en,s 1-)e runt rnl plan will h_ mode alth Ih s(I;u Plaue. 4. Will this proposal result in the emission of any hazardous Substances iscch as paint Or petroleum oroductS fumes), smulse. or odors into the atmosphere during construction or when the protect it comoleletil Yes .. No. Please explain. 5. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other imp,.'s to air. if any, N/A 6. Aill the project reou re Any work over, in or adjacent to twith 0 200 feet) of any surface water t 5ych as a stream.maiLJgse. or wetland' x Yes No J Nr:v D-a lnabo Swab. 7. Does the proposal lie within a 100-year fltodpla na _Yes x _No; If jHl pl= note the location on the site pl„n L J SEPA Exemption Checklist Page 2 8. Are there any envircnnrental health hazards. including exposire to toxic chemicals, risk of fire or explosion, soill or hazardous wasle that you know of that cquld occur as a result of this nr000sal" Yes x No 9. Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface or ground wafers° Yes x No 10. Could waste materials from the Proposal enter ground of surface waters? Yes_x._No IL Are there any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site? _Yes x No; If yes. please indicate what these are. 12. What woes. levels and hours of noise would be GLeated.l`v or associated with the oroiect due to its construction or operation? Rackhoe and associated construction equipment 7:00 a.m. to S:Oo 13. Could light or glare from the finished oroiect be a safety hazard or interfere with views from nearby propertiei9 Yes x No 14. Could the proposed oroiect alter or obstruct vi ws in the immediate vicinity' x Yes—No Removal of some trees may open up vlrws. Is. Would the proposed protect displace any ex sting recreal on uses on sites —Yes_,No; If so, please describe. 16. Will the oroiect in your opinion result in an ',creased need for public services (for example. fire or police protection. schools. eta Yes x No 17. What is the current =nine classification of the site? N/A 18, I(ypplicable. what is the L,rrent shoreline master program designatjgp_gi the site? .1A 19 What is the current list of the site and adjacent properties? S.F. Residential and Highway CERTIFICATION The abo.e answers are true and complet to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the Cip of Renton is relying on them in order to c insider the likely environmental effects of the abo\e described p•ojeci. Sitinatple Re3uonship to Applicant pile Signed FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Reviewed by: Date Rev w Rec =mended Classification' Exemption Upheld I Information including regular Environmental Checklist required Applicant Notified by, In Person By Phone on _ By Letter on 1 DKE:mjp 10/05/89 J 1 T• 23N.R . 5E.W.M. a .^' 1 t� � SE%yN W%SncO ••'��• SW o5F;6 SaCp I NW%p SE/o 5¢cb 4 P. 4 sa. 1 +� i o a•oa.Er. � � / K I O� N S��✓. n ^ •' d 17I r, t ..�}� .•'• '��..�\� I N La•oa'""_-_ � Y..•."� wcNTON Nona /a1rLl VAC ATt0 OVCRCROEIIINB `••%% _ - _ x I a J 4 s SEYSE%t i MEN 54, R E. I ii ri C) N p. N, Vol D `r' 11 To Sto.361+q0 -' r t Sta.�39 00 oo,x Lot pa.as sEYHWk e.as tr Qov'R lot 4 Sac 5 1 ill '. �W^areN M•�o.i vlot •{ Y l>r' _ i - I �R. :._. ! 'y ..I..r.. • I. � ,M��. � , I �i .wY w�r'YM� t 1 �^ ^ p I . O gl'l 0. e!'� la_xx7a n el I is r> SR 4: ------------- - -� — n•,n stt ac,v,ea-nwd . _— CPNII}MP11a IA lWAS P6 _ ar> 1 axon I Jar ani LN or o!N orv.lat f I RE axJTal�lla JIE l I 6 Y I l r • 1 L I�I,t�� Jx• �I 6 I. Io ,.'�#lz3 x..'�__r_. Jx> f00 J ]JI I , l ,; a..:.. a„a,n r,.., -*Be in Franch! 1 M ♦rr e•�.c,l...n.aw,.er,�,..W �' .9 r •1: IQO �6 ; Y .. qw, IL T. 23N . R . 5E. W. M. ---- — VOID �Tl '. T'T`�-•I 5ta.: 39•011ToS*v. t 5E%NW%4 Saco ' lpl{OGCS NWk SE,'(�Sacd �fOl DovtLo115ecE 0 M 0 N I Q Pf ' 4e1a1 V Fo•Ufa»V.00 a l� I 1a.\�1� TO S1o.�61.Clpf F nas --- --, -�--- EXHIBIT "�.. la.i i \ 4!W RGNTDK VACAtlD it FRANCHISE 0076 ._--:: t ] a • i s t D e• FAG E •V.Ift Nrw D D•p -�_�• d''- ' SW,4 NE Sy OacB 1 NW.(NEh`_.•cel- _. .! gn+ SR405 • ;�_4_„ a`' '� IIEY15f.119Y LEu1�LAT\L ARIOX OI tIf,]Ib'2;.,� T ^ _•Wf t w.'It•rs -Z1� SIE•ltt { {� w'" wt h w •. w t ��X•a,...,�. •, YE RENTON TO RENNYD7�+ <'4.•r ala 1S�f3 W i t y._ Y"_' �R,��wrii��•" as�.•�-E 4 t :—..: `' '.".;,':; PN SNOWING ACCESS Kl%G MUM Ilk `->•�� N ^N Evapn.n.d py cphn, rn:4; a 't W Y P•wadun N•E11 Ap 141a]Q. � [fit Sa<.5 SE/a F wW 6ac5 NEOWA Sacs z' � gl� � i E! to ta•,� it tl �Ort 3 3` w. v ;� 4�0 .', �j �i�.t 'F.?p,�a , Aa .lf0 ]]I R'. _ ••- 2 p! CROSS = q �I 'Y" f. _`____' M.P.6.3$.... n• V '. x. 'ji � j.: R QOS N O .�W i la 11 }` t 'a FOd PPan:hi.+*10076 .�` M1s ata aarv\c RSN « � Nd�r •�S [ I 'J'Jtt��,,!! IelO N RE N ,,.�+•wu...a t `�S �\ r ip]D a]I _._ I _ _ -_.�_. • a 2 IND:, 1, nu. h_4i�•,� \MP \ 41 T��h «Ac AcwN b M MNIU.atl tl a p�iaT .. C S"x1'Rt �� Yt\r t� (• •:w~./.w.Gwt.'M v.ev .v tv pd'. MP(o.Z7 - KIP631. AY..•«tl.q..••b•.I. it d 'Begin Franchj5e Gt S.lit • JAr E I, TEftCt�AaJ y,E£�. t W..a.ry awb Y1!•NYr•� r �,r �I .i 2. •.:.a �� :. ' IQO 6• 1 h ' 1� .l• ;' w L J ..n,;• t rr a , r 1 ;7 CPI'Y OF RENTON .11. BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor Ronald G. Nelson, Director February 18, 1988 ` Richard Houghton Public works Director 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, wa. 98055 1, RE: west Kcnnydals Sanitary Sewer Interceptor-Phase I File No. ECF-096-87 Dear Mr. Houghton: Transmitted 'terewith is a copy of the Determination of Mon- - significance - Mitigated and the Mitigation Measures for the above-referenced project. {{ If you have any questions, please call me at 235-2550. f rely, Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator DKE/adx Enclosure filedsk:a:covltr I 200 Mill Avenue South- Renton,Washington 99055-(2%) 235.2540 _J a a PIP ((4)) CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST NO. : ECF-096-87 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: NhE. 24theStreet from a loll tJones ary e wer along Avenue N.E. to the existing downstream sewer at N. 24th Strcet and Garden Avenue North. PROPONENT: City of Renton, Public Works Dept. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: On NINE 24th Street from Jones Avenue N.E., under I-405, then to North 24th Street and Garden Avenue North. LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton, Building & Zoning Department The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2) (c) . This decision was made after review of an expanded Environmental checklist and preliminary site plan, on file .with th_ lead agency. Conditions were imposed as mitigation measures by the En, i-onmeutal Review Committee under their authority of Section 4-2822(D) Renton Municipal Code (see attached sheet) . These cot. :itions are necessary to mitigate environmental impacts identified during the environmental review process. This DNS is issued under WAC 197-11.-340. The lead agency will not act _ on this proposal for fifteen (15) days from February 22, 1988. Any interested party gay submit written comments which must be submitted by 5:00 p.m. , Mar^h 8, 1988, in order to be considered. A fourteen (14) day appeal period will commence following the finalization of the DNS. Responsible Official: Environmental Review Committee City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055 Ph- ne: 235-2500 DATE OF DECISION: February 17, 1988 EFFECTIVE DATE: February 22, 1988 R eld G. Nelson Ln M. S r ngar Building/and Zoning Director Policy Dev pmen hector R c and C. Mqugnton Pub is Works' Director y. MEN i ':yL S I c(4) > DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE MITIGATION MEASURES PROJECT: City of Renton, Public Works Dept. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST: ECF-096-87 DESCRIPTION 01 PROPOSAL: Phase I is a 10" sanitary sewer along N.E. 24th Street from Jones Avenue N.E. to the existing downstredm sewer at N. 24th Street and Garden Avenue North. LOCATION OF PROP03AL: On NINE 24th Street from Jones Avenue N.E., under I-405, then to North 24th Street and Garden Avenue North. CONDITIONS: 1. That access routes be clearly marked and emergency vehicle access be maintained at all times. 2. That applicant meet with the Zoning Administrator to monitor compliance with these measures as well as to define mitigation measures to be used in later phases of this project. 3. That measures be taken to pi act Well Number 5 from surface drainage eonntamina:ion by a plan approved by the City. 4. That no more than 30 cubic yards of excavated material be stored on the site, with the remainder transported to an approved off-site fill area along routes approved by the City. 5. Tlat if changes in the boring installation system are required, applicant will confer with the Zoning Administrator to see if additional environmental disclosure is required prior to implementing any new system. 7 l ftllww "iii M ��N C4 '� CITY OF RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer. Mayor Ronald G. Nelson, Director Febrr.ary 18, 1988 Robert Bergstrom Engineering Department 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Wa. 98055 RE: West Kennydale Sanitary Sewer Interceptor-Phase I File No. ECF-096-87 Dear Mr. Bergstrom: Transmitted herewith is a copy of the Dete• ination of I'on- Significance - Mitigatid and the Mitigatic !easures for the ` above-referenced project. If you have any questions, please call me at 235-2550. s S' ely Dona K. Erickson, AICP k . Z or.i ng Administrator DKE/adk Enclosure filedsk:a:covltr 1 13 .". 1989 CITY Of RENTON Engineering Dept. 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2540 J .0 r \ � . I ( (4)) CITY OF RENTON DFTFRMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKIIST NO. : ECF-096-87 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Phase I is a 10" sanitary sewer along N.E. 24th Street from Jones Avenue N.E. to the existing downstream sewer at N. 24th Street and Garden Avenue Nortn. PROPONENT: City of Renton, Public Works Dept. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: On NINE 24th Street from Jones Avenue N.E. , under I-405, then to North 24th Street and Garden Avenue North. LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton, Building & Zoning Department The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2) (c) . This decision was made after review of an expanded environmental checklist and preliminary site plan, on file with the lead agency. Conditions were imposed as mitigation measurer by the Environmental Review Committee under their authority of Section 4-2822(D) Renton Municipal Code (see attached sheet) . These conditions are necessary to mitigate environmental h . •ts identified during the environmental review pro( ass. This DNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340. The lead agency will not act on this proposal for fifteen (15) days from February 22, 1988. Any interested party may submit written comments which must be submitted by 5:00 p.m. , March 8, 1988, in order to be considered. A fourteen (14) day appeal oeriod will commence following the finalisation of the 1 As. I Responsible Official: Environmental Review Committee City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055 Phone: 235-2500 i DATE OF DECISION: February 17, 1988 EFFECTIVE DATE: February 22, 1988 Rofield G. Nelson La M. 5 r nger , Buildingg, jand Zoning Director Policy Dev imen irector R:. er C. ghton . F21c Workd Director r I cc4>> DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE MITIGATION MEASURES A PROJECT: City of Renton, Public Works Dept. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST: ECF-096-87 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Phase I is a 10" sanit..ry sewer along N.E. 24th Street from Jones Avenue N.E. to the existing downstream sewer i at N. 24th Street and Garden Avenue North. 1 LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: On NINE :4th Street from Jones Avenue I N.E., under I-405, then to North 24th Street and Garden Avenue North. CONDITIONS: 1. That access routes be clearly marked and emergency vehicle access be maintained at all times. 2. Thr.t applicant meet with the Zoning Administrator to monitor compliance with these measures as well as to define mitigation measures to be used in later chases of this project. 3. That measures be taken to protect Well Number 5 From surface drainage - conntamination by a plan approved by the City. 4. That no more than 30 cubic Yards of excavated ma•. rial be stored on the site, with the remainder transported to an ap; oved off-site fill area along routes appr-ved by the City. 5. That if changes in the boring installation system are required, applicant will confer with the Zoning i Administrator to see if additional environmental disclosure is required prior to implementing any new system. k p J J V` M CITY OF RENTON PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Ma%m Design/Udny Engineering v MEMORANDUM DAZE: I'ebruary 17, 1988 10: Don Erickson, Zoning Administrator FROM: Bob Bergstrom, Engineering Supervisor SUBJECT: SEPA REVIEW 1) Lind Avenue S.W. Street Project I 2) West Kennydale Sanitary Sewer 3) Maplewood Watermains t As we discussed in person, the Department of Public Works has covered your concerns expressed in recent nnnnorandums. 1. Lind Avenue S.W. Street Pro ect: Project Description - Lind Ave. 7V.Will be widole o our and five lanes from S.M. 16th St, to S.W. Witt St. The work will include curb, gutter, sidewalks, underground utilities, street lighting, storm drainage, and a 12" watermain. The existing Lind Ave. S.W. Bridge will be widened from two to four lanes by W.S.D.O.T. in their HOV widening of 1-405. ir The maps will be transmitted to you as soon as they are available. I , 2. MMood Waternhain: No lead pipe nor joint materials have been u ed since11tv World liar TI in the Renton water system. the design is not complete at this time, however the fire hydrants will be spotted in conjunction with the Fire Marshall's office. The watermain is needed to provide fire flow capability to the future Golf Course Club House expansion, and providing transmission capacity to allow anv future wells in the Golf Course. I have attached a copy of the Water ) - Comprehensivc Plan Map for your use and reference. The Olympic Pipeline spill will be managed as I previously outlined in the SEPA Checklist and my correspondence to you. The temporary erosion/ siltation control will be. accomplished as per our Standard ' WSDOT/APWA/City Specifications (see attached). 3. West Kennydale Sani tar Sewer. The Phase 11 sewer is an 8" pipe to eaten to the south7—east wp to N.E. 20th St. I have attached another copy of the Sewer Comprehensive Plan for your review. 1 hope this finalizes the SEPA review for these projects. 1D.9.03.RE8nnf (attachments) "'� `;"� 200 Mill Avenue South. Renton,Washieron 98055•(2061 235-2631 41 L-- ,4 s CITY OF RENTON .y PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor Design/Utility Engineering 1 I MEMORANDUM DATE: January 20, 1988 TO: Don Erickson, Zoning Administrator FROM: Bob Bergstrom, Engineering Supervisor SUBJECT: SEPA and Shorelines West Kennydale Sanitary Sewer As you requested, here are my responses to your inquires in re West Kennydale sanitary sewer. What is Phase 1I4 7Tie ase portions of work will be the 8" sanitary sewer extension from Jones Avenue N.E., south of N.E. 24th St., which run east and south to the Highgate Sewage Pump Station, across the Poll property. I have attached another copy of the Sewer Comp. Plan, highlighted to show the work. Phase II is an 8" pipe and is not subject to SEPA review. 2. Traffic Impacts gg! e entire de7ign process of this sewer has peen dictated by traffic issues. The design of the sewer primarily using boring techniques, is to minimize impacts to traffic flow anu emergency vehicle movement. Ingress and egress will be preserved at all times to all properties along the route. This issue has been long and drawn out, and involved many hours with WSDOT and City Design staff. Construction vehicle parking and equipment storage will be allowed at the Well i5 site at the - northwest corner of Jones Avenue N.E. and N.E. 24th Street. 3. Soil and Erosion Control i ery tt a nrt ns moved in a boring out of the boring job, , approximately 370 cubic yards will be excavated out of the boring pit and casing pipe work. This amounts to only 15 truck loads, which will he stockpiled on the Well 15 site and then either used as land fill, or =d' disposed off site by the contractor. Because the earth work is so smal', and all the work is done on paved streets, the erosion control work is really just street sweeping and sprinkling. This will be the responsibility of the contractor. gI 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton,Washington 98055 •(206)235.2631 trrrr�+r� -402 �a � ♦ �� r f {� � � p _��/��,y AN r�� .a `, w .. s ja �� ' r�M, mere •r�.�.',i�r �. �.i ._�Y I rt Don Erickson January 20, 19BB W Page Two Maplewood Watermain Extension along the Cedar River 1. Access duri_ng—construction iTfe watermaTn trench ng will occur in the grass planter strips, so the roadway will be open to at least one-way traffic at all times. Individual home driveways may be blocked for up to an hour or so but will be promptly backfilled and surfaced each night. 2. Dirt Management e excavated cavatedtrench material will be stockpiled adjacent to the trench in the parking or curb lane, while an individual section of trench is dug out. It will then be backfilled into the trench as the pipe is filled. 3. Erosion Control The pipeline pelineas installed in street right-of-ways or in the golf course. The street segment is controlled by street sweeping. The golf course segment is all installed on flat ground, and adjacent grass areas buffer the excavation area from any erosion potential. - 4. Contaminated Soil Control Because the new watermain may pass through areas contaminated by the Olympic Pipeline spill, it is the intent of the City of Renton, Department of Public Works, to have Olympic Pipeline representatives present to monitor the excavated material, and if found unsuitable con- taminated material is discovered, require Olympic to remove and dispose of said material. 5. Asbestos Removal ATToTu'ZC pipes will be abandoned in place, and not removed. This is an accepted, and the safest option rather than attempting to remove and dispose of old AC pipes. 1D.8.21.REB:mf +e' Attachments I i I OF RFti T ° BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT i RGNALD G. NELSON - UIRECTOR MUNICIPAL SUILMNG MOM", VE.Sn RENTON,WASH 98055 • 235-2540 o' Ep �TEO SEDtEwO BARBARA Y.SMNPOCH MAYOR December 30, 1987 Robert E. Bergstrom, P.E. Engineering Supervisor City of Renton Department of Public Works City of Renton RE: West Kennydale Sanitary Sewer Project (ECF 096-87) Dear Bob: The Building and Zoning Department has received an application for the West Kennydale Sanitary Sewer Interceptor Project, Phase I. In order to officially accept the acpplication and proceed with its processing i additional information must be made available to our Department as 'ellows: 1. A complete description of Phase II of this project and of any additional phases of the sanitary sewer, including information concerning project location, specifications and relationships between each phase of the project. i 2. A complete description of projected traffic impacts during construction of I each phase of the project, including, but not limited to, ingress and egress i i points, establishment of detour routes, management of construction vehicles. 1 j Particular concern has been expressed about the need to ensure open travel Ii routes for emergency vehicles. 3. A complete description of plans for erosion control during construction of all phases of the project. 4. A complete description of plans for soil costa invllenL during construction of I 1 all phases of the project. 1 As soon as Building and Zoning receives this information, we will continue our evaluation of the project, and begin scheduling for environmental review. If you have questions concerning the completion of the application for the West ' Kennydale Sanitary Sewer Interceptor Project, please contact our staff; we - will be oleased to assist you. Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator West Kennydale Sanitary Sesser OF RF � � 'YT ELF: ` ,� � -►- � City of Renton "� ENVIRONMENTAL CHECYLIST 'to sev�f'� Purpose o' Checklist: The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43,21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decision.. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for allproposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an VS is required. Instructions for Applicants: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Govemmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do nc- know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write 'do not know'or 'does not apply." Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time er on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional Information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impacts. �{ Use of Checklist for Nonproiect Proposals:(Please Type or Print Legibly) I Complete this checklist for nonprojecl proposals, even though questions may be answered 'does not apply.' IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS(part D). For nonproject actions(actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs), the references in the checklist to the words 'project,' 'applicant,"and property or site' should be read as'proposal."'proposer,'and"offected geographic area,'respectively. A. BACKGROUND I 1. Name of proposed project,if applicable: West Kennydale Sanitary Sewer Interceptor, Phase 1 2. Name of applicant: City of Renton, Department of Public Works 3. Addm-s and phone number of applicant and contact person: Rabert E. Bergstrom, P.E. 235-2631 City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton WA 98055 4. Date checklist prepared: December 4, 1987 S. Agency m4uesting checklist: City of Renton 6. Proposed timing or schedule(including phas)ng, if applicable): Summer 1988 J J 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansions, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? if yes,explain. Future Phase 11 sanitary sewer work will extend the sanitary sewer pipe from l N.E. 24th St. and Jones Ave. N.E. - mid block southeasterly to N.E. 20th St. f and approximately Kennewick Ave. N.E. to intercept the existing sewage pump B. �is�ta y envHitv�antieAtel Information you know about that has been prepared. or will be prepared,directly related to this proposal. NONE 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for gweromental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the props Ay covered b, your proposal? If yes,explai,,. NO 10. List any governmental approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. Washington State Dept. of Transportation Utility Franchise for pipe under 1-405 right-of-way. ;1. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. The Kennydale West Interceptor, Phase I is a 10" sanitary sewer along N.E. 24th, From Jones Ave. N.E. to the existing down stream sewer at N. 24th St. and Garden Ave. North. 12. Location. of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise loratior of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range if known. If a proposal would Gccur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description. site plan, vicinity map, and topography map. if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. On N/NE 24th St, from Jones Ave. N.E., under I-405, then to N. 24th St. and Garden Ave. North. N.W. 1/4 of Section 5, 1WN 23 N. RSE. j B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. EARTH a. General description of the site (circle ore); flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous. other b. What is the steepest slope on the site(approximate percent slope)? 15% C. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, caly, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify Cher* -rd note any prime farmland. Hardpan d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. NO J 2 - e. Uescribe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. NONE i f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so. generally describe. VERY LITTLE g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction(for example,asphalt or buildings)? NONE h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the r earth, if any: The project is primarily a bored sanitary sewer. Very little of the project will be accomplished by open cut pipe installation. 2. AIR a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, indushial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. NONE b. Are there any off-site sources of emission? NO C. Proposed measures to reduce or control emisslons or other impacts to air, if any: N/A 3. WATER a. Surface: 1) is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. if appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. No permanent water courses. An intermittent creek flows from S.E. to the S.Y. from Jones Ave. N.E. and N.E. 20th, from its head waters at the old Berry farm to Lake Washington. This unnamed creek discharges into the lake in the Beach Part just .;nrth of the Boy's How. 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes,please describe and attach available plans. No shore lines. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would to placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. NONE - 3 - ^rrr.�re"iw.vssarlw� •awer.r.~+rr 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general desui;tion, purpose, and approximately quantities if known. r NO 5) Does tl► proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If se, note location on the site clan. NO 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. NO b. Groum 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and appaoximately quantities if known. NO 2) Descr waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic anks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; Industril, containing the following chemicals .; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, :he number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s)are expected to serve. NONE C. Water Runoff(including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collect on and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so,describe. The urban storm run off frc residential neighborhood is collected by open ditches en., guns in the unnaaed creek to Lake Washington. 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. NO L 4 _ L_ � r- I d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: l Temporary erosion control will be used during construction. 0. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: ❑ deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen,other o evergreen tree:fir,cedar,pine,other ❑ Shrubs lit, grass ❑ crop or grain ❑ Wet soil plants: cattail,buttercup,bullrush, skunk cabbage,other ❑ water plants:water lily,eel grass, milfoil,other a other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? None. Al 1 work is in paved streets. C. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. NONE d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants. or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: NONE 5. Animals a. Circle any birds an animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be in or near the site: Birds: Hawk, heron,ear-,soogiolrds.other MammaTs7eer,bear,elk, beaver,other Rodents Fish: bass, salmon, trout,herring,shellfish,other No Fish b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or new the site. NO C. 1s the site pa.t of a migration route? If so, explain. ' NO 1 S d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: NONE t 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) wil be used to meet the completed Project's energy needs? Describe whethe, it will be used for heating, manufacturing,etc. NONE D. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so,generally describe. NO C. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: NONE 7. Environmental Health _ a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so,describe. NO 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. NONE 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: NONE b. Noise I) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic.equipment,operation,other)? NONE -6- I i I p) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, ( construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come I Ifrom the site. Short term noise will be generated by construciton activity and power equipment. 1) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: Construction work will be limited to the hours of 8 AM to 5 PH from Monday thru Friday. 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current a of the site and adjacent properties? F reeway Single family residential b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. NO C. Describe any structures on the site. NONE d. Will any structures be demolished? If so,what? NO e What is the current zoning classification of the site? R-I f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Single family residential. g. If applicable. what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? N/A h. Has any part of the site been classified as an 'environmentally sensitive' area? If so,specify. No 1. Approximately how many People would reside or work in .he completed project? NONE J. Approximately how many people would the completed protect displace? NONE k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: N/A _?- 1 t J 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible .vith existing anal projected land uses and plans, if an; The sewer interceptor is sized to serve the residential neighborhood. 4. Flouring a. Approxim tely now many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. NONE b. Approximetely how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle,or low-income housing. NONE C. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: N/A 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s). not including antennas;what is the principal exterior building material(s)proposed. All work is below ground. b. What views in the imriediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? NONE C. .^ posed m- sures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: N/A 11. Light and Clam a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? NONE b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? NO Z. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? N/A d. Prupr d measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: N/.' _ 0_ 1 J 12. Recreation a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? NONE b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. NONE C. Proposed measures to reduce or control Impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: N/A 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservatior regieten known to be on or next to thr ,ite? If so. generally describe. NO b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. NO C. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: NONL 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. N/NE 24th St., Jones Ave. N.E., Meadow Ave N., Garden Ave. N. b. Is site currently served by public transit? if not, what is the approximateiy distance to the nearest transit stop? N. 30th St. and 1-405 approximately 1/4 mile. C. How many parking spaces would the rompleted project have? How many would the project eliminate? NONE d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets. or impinvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). NO _q- m e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? if so, generally describe. NONE f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the Completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. NONE g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts,if any: The design using primarily bored installation is used to minimize surface street and freeway conjestion. North 24th St. west of 1-405 is very narrow and does not have adequate width for a deep open cut pipe line installation. 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schuols, other)? If so, generally describe AO b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services. if any. N/A lb. Utilities a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water,refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer. septic system,other. All utility services are available. D. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility t providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or _ in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. The proposed project is a sanitary sewer interceptor to improve sanitary sewer service to northeast Renton. C. SIGNATURE 1, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is urderstood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Propor_nt: L Name Printed: Robert E. Bergstrom, P.E. City of Renton Dept, of Public Yorks 1 I i i i 1 y sll6 11-6-64 J t t ��P ►► 14 3>a '1►1,��i1 - p • yUil �i iip�iri �� , ■1 • � fli �\ .�,, w TT ii � VICIMITY 1 , . :� �� •� a •.,