HomeMy WebLinkAboutWWP2700510(2) WGP-27-0510 =CMM LIFT S=CN REPLACE= - Working File 1+
BEGINNING OF
FILE
f ILL TITLE wWP21-0510
(207-nN woor)
joa,lFr 9TA477PAIRERACEMeN"F
WORKIn1G Fib
s�.J y - • x�j
S ,
M1t A
F 3 e'G •f. 't`�� I
si
WASTEWATER UTILITY CIP COST DATA AND INVENTORY
.�/j
j NAME OF / — t 7' - t0!/ 1�. �1—d11 G S L/T_ CITY
PROJECT: PROJECT W'W'P- Q�slO
NUMBER
To Cii)ARenwn DATE. .. n't '
Plan Review Salton
PHnning/Buddnig/Pub[.c Works was
200 Mill Avenue South — '4
Renton•WA 9W55
Per the request of the City of Renton,the following 1 ;q y tg information is htrnisbeC concerning cods for improvements proposed f +
to be installed for the above referenced project.
NFW SANI1 Ry�WFRAJSTEM. �A,y)�NFn SANt"ARY cFWFR aycTEM_ � f
LNyth Sea Tyre �_ Length Sue Type 1 'r'
L.F.q _ tJl. t [(c SEYVFR MAIN IyQ_ LF.o! 4EWER MAIN ;,
'17 L F.of _ ��_ SEWER MAIN L F.of SEWER MAIN
LF.of SEWER MAIN LF.of SEWERMAiN
I LF of SEWER MAIN L.F.of SEWER MAIN . y.,.•;y j.,
_7, EA of o46 DIAMETER LNN110LE5 EA of DIAMETER WNHOLES ` x:
of DIAMETER MANHOLES �_ EA of LIFT STATION : s f'
EA of DIAMETER MANHOLES
EA W LIFT STATION
Work Or r No
Cost _s JQ7S -
�
��6ttto l/1 �1elZl`ST���u -
Project Mansger (day Pl., C) (SIG )
(,,m COSTDATI-D(h'Ni
i
f
I
{
1 JCDE LRP JOB COST DETAIL REPORT for Perloaz: - 9412 01/16/96 10:26 Pepe 15
JaD: 14002 COTTONNOm LIFT SIATI DM REPLACEMENT Mgr: CHRISTENSEN
W: 45005 COTTONIAOOU L.S. REPL-PW Mg, CHRISTENSEN Budget: 38,921.61
Tr date Dxu t Des, Attant NourN LAW, Benefits Ve , Neterlet EQ ip Other SWtotal EenME Tatel Rever4N
..... ........ ...... .. .. .......
F.t: 0000
04/14/93 93-&-030 TRANSFER 121 5% 478.00 478.00 478.00
f.t: 5100 AMISITION/CONDEwI
12/15/91 BENOIT 401 535 7.00 139.71 61.33 201.04 201.04
O9/15/92 65431 COTTONNOID LIF 421 5% 3289.00 32".00
W/28/92 04'3958 TRIAD ASSOC[AT 421 5% 3 OO= 3259.00 3289 W
0130192 65431 COLTOX11000 LIF 421 5% -3289.00 -1289.00
10/15/92 BENOIT 401 535 12.00 246.20 103.SO 3SO.10 350.10
06/15/93 BENOIT 401 535 2.00 41.03 19.00 60.C3 60.03
.font 51C0
21.00 426.94 1%.21 32B9.o0 SWO.17 3900.17
funk 5110 AIM IN SUPPWL
O1/31/91 FERRINGSTAO 401 539 2.00 22.17 9.73 31.% 31.% �A
02/15/91 FERRI NGSTAD 401 539 4.00 48.36 21.23 69.59 69.59
-F-vxt 5110
6.DO 70.53 30.% 101.49 101.49
F.t: 5130 COUNCIL MEETINGS/RESPONSE
11/15/91 9EWIT 401 535 2.00 36.23 IS." 52.13 52.13
F.t: 5160 PRELIMINARY DESIGN/ERG
10/15/90 BENOIT 401 535 2.00 31.92 /5.80 47.72 47.72
01,31/91 A217 401 535 97.65 97.65 97.65
O1/31/91 SEW IT 401 535 11.00 195.72 85.92 261.& 281.&
02/15/91 SEWIT 401 535 12.00 207.38 91.04 2%.42 M.42
03/31/91 BENOIT 401 535 10.00 In.19 80.42 263.61 263.61
04/15/91 BENOIT 401 535 1.DO 17.26 7.58 24.84 24.&
OSi31/91 6041 401 538 15.00 15.00 15.00
05/31/91 NOBSON 401 538 2.00 29.69 13.03 42.n 42.72
%/15/91 CHRISTENSEN 401 535 6.00 123.71 54.31 178.02 178.02
%/30/91 SEWIT 401 535 12.00 235.75 103.49 339.24 339.24
07/31/91 SEWIT 401 535 12.00 206.12 90.49 2%.61 2%.61
08/15/91 BENOIT 401 535 1.00 18.14 7.96 26.10 26.10
10/31/91 SEW I 401 535 11.00 191.% &.28 276.26 276.26
11/30/91 BENOIT 4CF 535 11.00 208.SO 91.53 300.03 300.05
12/31/91 SEWIT 401 535 22.00 429.11 180.10 617.49 617.49
01,31/92 BEW!: W1 535 3.00 56.92 24.02 So.% $0.94
02/15/92 BEN01T 401 535 5.00 105.34 44.45 149.79 149.79
02/15/92 BENOIT 401 535 1.87 .79 2.66 2.66
04/15/92 BEWIT 401 535 1.00 19.15 8.08 27.23 27.23
1
$4 -
JCDETRp JOB COST DETAIL REPORT For periatis: - 9412 01/16/95 10:26 page 16
1; Jab: 14002 COTTONWOOD LIFT STATIOI AEPLACENEMT agr: CMRISTENSEN
`g Ip: 45M COTTONWOOD L.S. RE9L-p80 NRr: CMRISTENSEN Bud"t: 38,921.67
p
;M it Wte Dacrrnt De r ACCa t Hours Labor Benefits Ve116er Ileterfel Ewip Othor 8 jotsl Etxu6 total ReVeNNa
{t ------- -------- ....... ----- ----- ........ -.--.. ...----' ..... ..... ........ ...... ..... .......
04/15/92 BENOIT 401 535 .11 .50 .57 .57
OS/15/92 BENOIT 401 535 1.00 21.50 19.07 55.61 55.61
OS/31/92 BENOIT 401 535 3.DO 21.65 4.75 30.57 30.57
06/30/92 BENOIT 401 535 4.00 73.21 24.75 03.40 03.40
07/15m BENOIT 401 535 4.W 19.55 33.25 111.21 111.21
08/15/92 BENOIT 401 535 1.00 19.55 9.52 27.00 27 00
OB/15/92 BENOIT 401 535 1.00 22.57 5.59 32.09 32.09
OB/31/92 CNRISTENSEM 401 535 7.00 192.07 34.63 221 02 221 02
09/30/92 BENOIT 401 535 0.00 02.63 34.63 116.79 116.70
10/31/92 BENOIT 401 535 12.00 241.03 17.31 322.27 322.27
11/15/92 BENOIT 401 535 2.00 41.03 t7.31 50,34 50.34
11/30/92 BENOIT 401 535 7.00 1".13 0.26 224.65 224.65
12/15/92 SENOR 401 535 8.00 161.55 69.26 2'3.39 233.39
12/31/92 BExOR 401 535 5.00 61.55 25.97 .52 37.52
01/15/93 BENOIT 401 535 5.D0 41.04 19.00 133.71 131.71
01/31/93 BENOIT Al 535 5.00 12.04 $2.25 60.04 60.Of
O1/31/93 BENOIT 401 535 5.00 112.59 52.25 165.10 165.10
02/15/93 BENOIT 401 535 5.50 137.93 63.50 150.09 150.09
02/20/% BENOIT 401 535 1.50 120.52 69.50 20/.79 201.79
O3/15/93 BENOIT 401 53S 2.00 37.62 9.50 30.02 30.02
OS/31/93 BENOKWIT 401 535 2.00 37,62 19.50 55.04 55.04
06/15/93 BERIST 401 535 T.00 54.01 1.31 30.01 M.01
05/31/93 CNRISTENSEM 401 535 4.00 193.34 43.22 225 32 225 3a
OS/11/93 CMRISTENSEN 401 535 3.30 93.34 U.22 136.F: 136.56
06/15/9 CNNISTEM$EM 401 535 3.00 70.07 32,41WOO
102.0 102.42
06/30/9. CHRIGEND i 401 535 4.00 02.07 43.22 120.07 120.07
07/15/9, CMRISTENSEN 401 535 6.00 42.40 65.93 136.56 136.56
07/31/93 CMRISTENSEN 401 535 $.DO 162.40 37.91 2011 yy 208 73
07/11/93 CNRISTENSEM 401 535 B.00 234.96 07.79 2n.n 2n.n 3 05/31/93 CNRISTENSEM 401 535 9.00 239.31 110.80 343.75 343.75
09115/0 CNRISTENSEM 401 Sly 11.00 239.31 110.80 350.11 350.11
09/15/93 CNRISTENSEM "1 535 14.DO 332.26 153.64 406.10 406.10
09/30/93 CMRISTENSEN 401 Sys 14.00 332.26 153.& 486.10 406.10
10/15/93 BENOIT 401 535 2.00 43.06 19.15 56.10 63.03 10/15/93 CNRISTENSEM 401 535 7.00 166.14 76 02 263.06 20.03 10/31/93 CMRISTENSEN "1 535 1.DO 26.10 12.08 43.06 30.10
11/15/93 CMRISTENSEN 401 535 3.00 72.20 37,,43 1p5 63 105 63
11/30/93 CMRISTENSEN 401 535 3.DO 72.63 75.63 .79.26
ID6 12/15/93 CNRILTEN$EN 401 535 15.DO 356.00 1A.0 520 106.26 26 106 12/31/93 CMRISTENSEN 401 535 7.00 152.20 M-51 520 22003
O1/IS/N, CMRISTENSEN 401 535 10.^0 264.93 110.49 222.79
01/31/94 CMRIBIEN-EN 401 535 16,DO 305.37 1'N.90 39342 02/15/% CMRISTENSEN 401 535 18.00 433.53 ;.1O.Z6 572.27 R 393 42 572.27
643,77 6U 79
02/2&1% CMRISTENSEN 401 535 13.00 401.74 194.04 596.50 643.50
l .
Nr•
f,
y -
,N
N v '
OM
JOETRP JOB COST DETAIL REPORT For Peri Pole: - 9412 01/16/95 10:26 Page 17
. /4002 COTTONYOOD LIFT STATION REPLACEMENT Mgr. CNRISTENSEN
O 45005 COTTgRgOD L.S. REPL-PW Ngr: CNRISTENSEN Budget: 38,921.67
Tr data Docent Dee., Account Hours Labor 8N1MIFite VetH9r NateriaL Epulp JCNer Sul total EtR:umb� Total RRaAYAHN
-..- ..-- --- ------- ----- ----- -------- ------ -------- ----- ----- - ------ ----- ..... -------
03/15/94 CNRISTENSEN 401 535 11.00 278.13 134-M 413.02 413.02
03/31/94 CNRISIENSEN 401 535 7.00 162.25 78.69 240.94 240.94
%/15/% CNRISTENSEN 401535 16.W 404.54 1%.20 6W.74 6W.74
j 04/30/P4 CNRISTENSEN 401 535 5.W 139.07 67-45 2%.52 206.52
05/15/94 CNRISTENSEN 401 535 11.00 305.95 10.39 454.34 454.34
05/31/94 CNRISTENSEN 401 535 5.00 115.6B 56.20 172.08 172.08
06/15/% CNRISTENSEN 401 535 9.W 227.55 110.36 337.91 337.91
06/30/94 CMRISTEMSEN 401 535 7.00 176.915 85.84 262.82 262.82
07/15/94 CMRISTEMSEN 401 535 3.00 75.85 36.79 112.64 112.64
08/15/94 CNRISTENSEN 401 535 3.00 75.35 16.n 11 Z.& 112.6E
08/31/94 CNRISTENSEN 401 535 1.00 '3.17 11-4 34.41 34.41
09/30/94 CMRISTEMSEN 401 535 2.00 `-57 24.53 75.10 IS.10
10/15/% CNRISTENSEN 401 535 1.00 27.82 1L49 41.31 41.31
-F.t 5160
46tl.o0 10159.08 476B.50 112.65 15240.31 15240.31
F v:ct: 5170 ENVIRCIIMENTAL ANALYSIS
02/15/92 BENOIT 401 535 1.00 21.07 B.89 29.% 2D.%
Oa/IS/92 BENOIT 401 535 .39 .16 .55 .55
02/29/W BENCIT 401 535 1.00 21.07 8.39 29.96 29.96
02/29/92 BENOIT 401 535 .40 .17 .57 .57
03/%;92 92-n3-123 PYRNT IN CITY 421 5% 14W.00 14W.W 1400.W
03/15,92 BENOIT 401 53S .40 .17 .51
03/15/92 BENOIT 401 539 1,00 21.07 8.89 29.% 29.%
0/31/92 BE6O1T 40, 535 .35 .15 .50 .50
03/31/92 BENOIT 401 535 1.00 17.56 7.4' 24.97 24.97
J5/31/92 BENOIT 401 $35 1.00 21.51 9.08 30.59 30.59
•Floc[ 5170
S.W 103.82 43.81 14W.00 1547.67 1547.63
Rnct: 52M FIUNCIAL ACTIVITIES
12/23/92 92 12-112 JC5 NUV STAFF ON 532 13.48 -13.0 13.48
12/23/92 92-1:-112 JCS NOW STAFF 401 535 13.48 13.48 13.48
12/25/92 92-W-113 92 UT IL C:P 000 532 -111.30 -111.30 -111.30
1 c/28/92 92-11-113 GF STAFF 1-9 401 535 111.30 111.30 111.30
08/31/93 B033 000 532 40.04 40.04 40.%
OB/31/93 NSTMERSEF ON 532 11.00 204.24 94.56 298.80 295.60
12/27/93 93-12-0% JCS SIM' 000 532 -572.51 572.51 -572.51
12/27/93 93-12-096 JCS S1AFr 000 532 -1618.72 -1615.72 -1618.72
12/27/0 73-12-096 JCS STAFF 401 535 572.51 572.51 5R.51
12/27/93 93-12-096 JCS STAFF 401 535 1618.12 1615.12 1618.72
12/31.93 93-12-102 000 532 160.92 -160.92 -160.92
i
JMETRP JOB COST DETAIL REPORT for Peri oBs: - %12 01/16/95 10:26 P010 18
J96: 14002 CDTTWWOOD LIFT STATEN REPLACEMENT Mgr: CMRISTENSEN
Wo: 45M COTTONWOOD L.B. REPL-PW Mqr: CMRISTENSEN Buget 38,921.67
IT Clete D. NvHt D,rocr ACC.t M..11 LR6Or B.fit. Ve r MRteri•W Fwip Other Subtetel EDcNib Tool RevmRM•
------- -------- ----- ------- ...-. -.... ....... ---... ........ ----- ----- --- --- ...... ----- .......
12/31/93 93-12-102 401 535 160.92 16092 160.92
03/16/% 94-03-019 JCS STAFF ON 532 -130.62 -130.62 im.0
O3/161% 94-03-019 JCS STAY 401 535 130.62 130.67 130.62
•f.t 520O
11.00 204.24 94,56 40.04 338.84 338.84
Wrcc 5220 INSPECTION
12/15/91 MC65NR, 401 538 2.00 35.62 IS." 51.26 51.26
07.91/93 8033 000 532 LLB 7.28 7.28
07/31/93 NETHERSEE 600 532 2.00 40.51 18.76 59.27 59.27
06/15/93 ATNERSEE O00 532 5.00 111.41 SI-58 162.99 162.W
08/15/93 NELSON ON 532 4.00 64.00 29.63 93.63 93.63
08/15/93 8033 NO 532 18.20 18.20 is.20 y
03/31/93 6033 M 532 32.76 32.76 32.76
W/31/93 NELSON 000 532 6.00 95.00 44.45 140.45 140.45
S W/15/93 9ETMEPBEE ON 532 7.00 i4'.9 65.65 207.44 207.44
091301,93 8033 NO 532 81.72 33.72 M.72
09/30/93 t.ETMLRW ^O W 16.V1 ISC.OS 474.14 474.14
10/15/93 AO..0 000 `.': _6 51 '436 59.27 59.27
10,15/93 A289 NO 532 5.92 5.92 5.9:
10/31/93 9033 NO 512 50.96 50.% 50.96
10/31/93 Nf THEME 000 532 14.OQ 311.94 144.43 456.37 456.37
1l/30/93 8033 O6O 532 7.25 7.28 7.28
11/30/93 NETMERBEE WO 532 5.00 105.02 48.62 153.M 153.64
12/15/93 NETNERREE J00 532 3.00 0.76 28.13 88.89 ea."
12/31/0 0033 WO 532 14.56 14.56 14.56
12/31/93 NETMERBEE ON 532 1.00 18.57 8.60 27.17 27.17
•F.t 5220
67.00 b4.22 624.30 220.68 21Y.20 21%.20
F.t: 5250 LEGAL SERVICES
02/15/92 DOTSCR OW 532 2.63 1.11 3.74 3.74
02/15/92 DOTSON DOD 532 6.00 114.53 48.33 162,86 162.86
1 •Floc1 5250
6.0 1117.16 49.44 166.60 166.60
FM¢90 5310 MG1. 8 ADMEN
09130190 ABENOITNDERS 401 535 3.00 52.11 40.18 23.49 52.49
W/30/90 ANDERSON 401 535 1.50 82.59 15.0 147.81 t47.47
81
i 101151% PARSONS 401 535 1.50 31.97 Ism 47.81 47.80
10/15/W PARSONS 401 538 L50 319] 'S.83 47.80 47.80
F
4 v
M -t
�Sb
5
.A
+� jAA e
��t F
3T° a vre
-w
JCOETRP JOB COST DE.AIL REPORT For Peri Prls' - 9412 01/16/95 10:M PW 19
JPM: 14002 CTTONIKKE, LIFT STATION REPLACEMENT Mgr: CHRISTENSEN
ND: 45005 COTTOWNUD0 L.S. REPN-P30 Mgr: CHRISTENSEN Bud t: 18,921.67
f Tr dAta DocmMnt Desrr Acc.t Hour. LOWC 'tercf l to VIFMor Materiel EpFip OtNcr SW rcu totel E6 io[el R
/ 1/91 PARSONS 401 535 .SO 10.4 awrMr
�
.... .57 ...... ........ ..... ..... ...14. .99 ...... .....
4. 7 G 14 99 01/31/91 PARSONS 401 530 Sp t0.N 4.S 14.98 14.98
N -Fort 5310
0
i9.GO 202.48 99.GS 301.54 301.54
F14/92 016 xpx-LABOR
12/31/92 M161 MODEL 06-204 T 421 5% 500.00 SDO.00 12/J1/92 6816] MODEL OG-20G i R1 5% 500.00 -500.00 O3/22/93 099186 PRESERVATIVE P 421 5% 486 90 4Bb S0 4 05/21/93 93-M-037 SIERRA HEIGHTS 421 5% 86 90613.19 611.19 613. 9
1 0'/30!0 JE07 34 SIERRA HITS 93- 421 5% -613.19 -613.19 -613.19
eFV t 5330
4%.90 486.90 SINS.%
FN r: 5P0 PLANNING
02/28/91 BENOIT 401 535 15.00 316J4 139.05 455.A 45SJ9
F-tz 5430 SSRVIOES CONSULTANT 1
10/31/90 PARSONS 401 535 1.50 29.31 14.51 4}.82 f} Y+
10/31/90 PARSONS 401 538 1.50 29.31 14.51 43.82 11/30/% PARSONS 401 535 2.00 42.64 MIT 63.]5 4 •�
11/30/90 PARSONS 401 SM 2.GO 42.64 21.11 65 i5 4;'
01/17/91 46N9 CAC 002-91 E. 421 5% 432166.00 43H0 01/I7/91 "Na CAG ON-", TA 421 5% 43%9.00 {3%9.00 02/25/91 0"R221 RN2 EMGIMEERIM 421 5S6 12M.47 12095 <] 120% W 02/28/91 {6]99 CAG 002-91 E. 421 5% -12095.4] -12M.47 i 02/28/97 46]99 'AG 002-91 E. 421 5% -12M.47 -12M.47 03/11/91 0R629 RN2 EMGIMEERIN 421 5% 3362 94 7362 94 3}62 94 72
03/31/91 JE03-19 421 5% -12M.47 -120%.N -12O5.N j 03/31/91 46]99 CAG O02-01 E. 421 5%
03/31/91 4e636 CAG O]9-90, IM 421 5% .3362 94 -3]O362.%
04/30/91 068366 RN2 EMGIMEERIM 421 5% 3362.94 33u2.94
C4/30/91 G6]98 CAG 0]9 %, G 421 596 2G0 t.11 2401.37 2401.37
OS/21/91 OM57 RN2 EMGINEERIM 421 5% 2612 'M01.31 -2612.59
OS/31/91 {6]9B CAG 0]9-9Q TA 421 5% .59 2612.59 26 .
06/10/91 ON014 RN2 EMGIMEERIM 421 596 -2612.59 -2612.59
06/24/91 0004V RN2 ENGIMEF.RIN 421 5% 1%2.02 668].44 668].44 1952.02 6657.44
06/30/91 46n8 CAG On W, TA 421 5% 8 .
06/30/91 46]98 CAG On %, TA 421 S% -1%2.02 -1952.02
08/12/91 052168 RN2 EMGIMEERIM 421 5% 11185.14 -668].4{ 66BL 144
O8131/91 46]98 CAL ON-%, TA 421 5% 11165.14 11185.14
i -11185.14 -11135.1409/09/91 C889 RH2 EMOIYEERIN G21 596 5026.32 5026-32 5026.32
4,
r S
XS
Lrw 21i
i
5
3�
Lra
ON
JCDETA JOg COST DETAIL REPORT for Par'oCs: 9412 01/16/95 10:M Page 20
Jetl: 14002 COTTOI11100D LIFT STATION REPLAGWENT Mgr. CHRISTEMSEN
NC: 15M COTTONWOOD 1.5. REPL PW Mgr. CHRISTENSEN RLdger: 38,921.67
Ir W Vf t. Doe. t Desrr A499t W.I. Labor 9a0,. 9ervior bterial EWiO Other SWtotal EMtaO iota! Ravx*u
.. .... ........ ...-.-. ..... -..-- --- ..-.-. -------- ..... ----- ........ ...... ..... .-----.
09/30/91 46798 LAG On-%, IA 421 5% -5026.32 -5026.32
11/25/91 M222 RN? ENGINEER'S 421 5% 22%.46 2206.46 2206.46
11/30/91 467% ONG O7 -90, TA 421 5% -2206.46 -2206.46
12/04/91 57356 EAST RENTON SE 421 5% 2".GO 2011.00
12/09/91 0555N RIRAMSRM, ICA 421 596 208.00 208.00 2M.00
121B/91 086052 RM2 ENGINEER[*421 5% 6675.84 6675.84 6675.84
12/27/91 JE12-51 421 5% 208.00 208.00 208.GO
12/31/91 46M CAG 079-90, TA 421 5% -1858.88 -1558.58
12/31/91 46M CAG On-W, TA 421 596 -6675.84 6675.84
12/31/91 57356 EAST UNION BE 421 5% 208.00 208.00
11/01/92 46798 GAG On-%, TA 421 5% 1858.88 1858.88
01/07/92 589117 CAG 079-W, AD 421 5% 12035.00 12035.00
01/27/92 OU765 RN2 ENGINEERIN 421 5% 473.29 473.29 476.29
01/31/92 46798 CAD 079-W, TA 421 5% -473.29 -473.Z9
02/24/92 0876W RM2 ENGINEERIN 421 5% 11722.16 11722.16 11722.16
02/28/92 4678 CAD 079-W, TA 421 5% 1385.59 -1385.59
02/28/92 5W87 CAS On-", AD 421 5% 10336.57 -10336.57
06/02/92 U057 ADO 2-92 CAS 0 421 5% 9060.00 9060.00 -+
,glr19, 09tN92 A42 EMGII ENT', 421 506 10723.43 10723.43 10723.43
09/3019Z AZT'.. RM 2-92 r G 101 5% -9025.00 -9025.00
09/10/92 M. ONO L V.W, 2: 5% 1698.43 1698.43
12/07/92 096042 RIG? EIIDINEf' .21 5% 35.GO 35.W 35.00
12/31/92 62D57 1 1 : 42 UG U 421 596 35.GO 35.JO
09/14/93 75882 ADD. * -93, T. 421 5% 13954.00 13984.00
10/11/93 105481 RN2 ENGINEERIN 421 5% 8202.M SZ02.78 82, .78
10/31/93 7588G ADO. 03-93, T. 421 5% 8202.78 -P L m
11/30/% 75882 ROD. 0-93, T. 421 5% �1415.69 -1.85.69
1/30,93 75882 00. C-91, T. 421 5% -231.76 231.76
11/30/93 1N6R57 RN2 ENGINEERIN 421 596 1717.45 1717.45 1717.45
12/31/93 75882 ROD JC-91, T. 121 5% 1623.04 -1623.04
12131/93 758112 ADO. 93-93, 1. 421 596 2440.73 -2440.73
01/10/94 1W298 RM2 ENGINE-RIM 421 5% 2"0.73 2440.73 2440.73
Dt/01/92 75882 ADD. g3-93, T. 421 5% IA23.04 1623.04
1 01124/94 IN710 R92 ENGINEERIN 421 5% 229.26 229.26 229.26
{711 11/31/94 75882 ROD. 0-93, 1. 421 5% .229.26 -229.26
1L28/94 R882 ADD. 03-93, 1. 421 5% -4%.10 -494.10
02128/94 109746 RM2 ENGINEERIN 421 5% 494.10 494.10 494.10
031281% 11D617 RM2 ENGINEERIN 421 5% 899.68 899.68 899.68
1
3/31/94 75882 ADD. 0-93, T. 421 5% .899.68 -899.u-
10/24/94 86101 IN9G. 10635 61 421 5% 4212.64 4212.64
11/14/94 117884 RM2 ENGINEERIN 421 596 4212.64 4212.64 4212.64
11/30/94 $6101 INNG. IM35 6/ 421 5% -4212.64 -4212.54
`r'not %10
7.00 143.90 71.24 95564.11 12303.47 83475.76 83475.78
•
w�
N _J
5 t e
Y
40
AA �(•
t�•
yy�A
T
Y
Cy,
JMETRP JOB COST DETAIL REPORT for PRRods: - %12 01/16/95 10:26 RAW 21
J06: I4D02 COTTONWOOD LIFT STATION REPLACEMENT OR, CNRISTENS2N
W: 45005 COTTON51010 L.S. REPL-PAD MR, CNRISIENSEN BWd9et: 39,921.67
Tr We Dwc t Deacr Account Hours Labor BwrfitN Verdor Material EWip Other Sbtotal Ercueb Total RevanJa
..._... ..------ --- ....... ..... .._- -------- ------ ......... ----- ----- -------- ...... .._.. ....-__
F urc t: 5460 SERVICES CONTRACTOR 1
06/28/93 1023M OE GA CONTRACT 421 5% 10732.50 10732.80 1W32.B0
06/29/93 102301 DMIEGA CONTRACT 421 5% 520.00 520.00 520.E
07/26/93 103207 MGA CONTRACT 421 5% 15789.60 15789.60 15789.60
07/26/93 103208 OMEGA CONTRACT 421 596 765.Oo 765.00 765.00
OB/30/93 104180 ONE GA CONTRACT 421 5% 37156.64 37156.64 37156.64
O8/30/93 104181 DANGA CONTRACT 421 5% 1800.23 1 SOD.23 1800.23
O9/27/93 105U16 OMEGA CONTRACT 421 5% 1125.00 1121.00 1125.00
1 09/27/93 105015 ONE OR CONTRACT 421 5% 23220.00 23220.W 23220.00
10/25/93 105898 OMEGA CONTRACT 421 5% 62147.04 62147.04 62147.04
i 10/25/93 105899 OMEGA CONTRACT 42'% 5% 3011.00 3011.00 30:1.00
11/30/93 106822 OMEGA COITRArl 421 5% 432132.08 43282.08 43262.W
1 11/30/93 106623 WGA CONTRACT 421 5% 2097.00 �1 2097.0„ 2097.00
12/01/93 JE12-47 OEGA CONST 421 5Re 533➢ % 153375.06 5SM-06
12/20/93 107579 OMEGA CONTRACT 421 5% 23281.92 - 23231,92 23281.92 8
12/20/93 1075BO ONE GA CONTRACI 421 5% 1128.00 1128.00 1128.00
04/25/94 111512 WGA CONTRACT 421 596 25190.60 25190.60 251%.60
04/25/% 111513 OMEGA CONTRACT 421 596 1220.47 1220.47 1220.47
•Furct 5460 252467.38 53375. 305842.44 305842.K
1 Furct: 5510 SURVEY
08/15/92 MC OMIE JR. 000 532 4.00 78.27 33.03 111.30 111.30
{ 11/16/92 M151 INV. 32052 COT 421 5% -.50 1".50
j 11/20/9' MAC ONIE JR. OOO 532 .50 9.48 4.00 13.48 13.48
11/23/9) 045739 TRIAD ASSOCIAT 421 5% 144.50 144.5G 144.50
11/30/9e 63151 INV. 32052 COT 421 5% -144.50 144.50
I •F.t 5510
4.50 87.75 37.03 144.50 269.28 269.18
{ -W 45005
614.00 13419.09 6158.16 351951.89 373.37 42%9.59 414852.10 414852.10
ab 14002
j 61600 13419.O9 6158.16 351%1.89 373.37 42%9.59 414852.10 414852.10
Cfl��F-1 l,�J� Cr�T4rl
Z331334 uu
+ i�i 133.39
�fln7, 11
i
a
-4
BEGINNING
OF FILE
WHEN RECORDED RM"TO. Utilities
Otnec of the CITY(:leek vn91m
Rrnwn Mumlipd rush
EASEMENT percel Tax lccowt Ye
200 Mill Av<nue Rent!
Remora.WA 980A5
L_
7th day
a of Junes--- 993
THIS INSTRUMENT,made this_ Y
Daniel t. Shane and
by and between lae>�vme^'>P`c+"+°",Iww.x and
and
and _ --�—
CO County,
ra
hereinafter called°Gntor(s),"and the CITY OF RENTON,a Municipal Corporation of King
J Washington,hereinafter called'Gntttec.' and the
t for and m consideration of the release of existing eaument,AF completion
c') That sold GrantoKs), cony ,and
IT, partial telease of existing easement,AP tion, do b both releases subsequent u tics(in of the
do by these presents,g water
replacement of the Cottonwood is s station, an casement for public utWties(including water
warrants unto the said Gtan[ce.its successor and assigns,
and sewer)with necessary appurenances over,under,thin m particularly gh,across described u f�ROwss.
property(the nghtof-of in Ring County,Washington.
Exhibit'A'attached hereto
It is the intent of this instrument to be a temporary easement [o allow s. The Grantor
operation, and
maintenance of the Cottonwood i.ift Station with necessary appertenanees. The n nt utility
and Grantee
moth agree with the execution of this document•to negotiate in good faith, a permanent utility casement.
Said permanent utility easement shall be of equal or lesser area than this temporary easement and consist
foot) wee
around the completed lift station and a 10•
of an approximate 20'x 30'(twenty by thirty f
(ten foot)easement centered along the completed sewer mains. This executed cces asement be en accepted for
shall remain ur
force during cnstrucion and he
ties ind
the operationoand mtain[enan entil by uch time asthe the Grantee and tar permanent utilityneasement ids negotiated and
executed.
EXGK 9 T
X No0m oMQsionflED
D.war
UtWe1n pN¢mene _
Slmee 1 J 2 ��
This temporary easement is for the purpose of constructing,reconstructing,instaliing.repairing,
replacing,enlarging,operating and maintaining utilities and utility pipelines,including,but not limited to,
water,sewer and storm drainage Wes,together with Cie right of ingress and egress thereto without rrior
institution of any suit or proceedings of law and without incurring any legal obligation or Liability
therefore. Following the initial construction of its facilities,Grantee may from time to time construct such
additional facilities as it may require. This easement is granted subject to the following temu and
conditions:
1. The Grantee shall,upon completion of any work within the property covered by the easement,
restore the surface of the easement,and any private improvrments disturbed or destroyed during
execution of the work,as nearly as practicable to the condition they were in iromediately before
commencement of the work or entry by the Grantee.
2. Grantor shall retain the right to use the surface of the easement as long as such use does not interfere
with the easement rights granted to the Grantee. Grantor shall not,however,have the right to:
a. Erect or maintain any buildini s or structures within the easement;or
b. Plant trees,shrubs or vegetatici,having deep root pattems which may cause damage to or interfere
with the utilities to be placed within tte caa:ment by the Grantee;or
c. Develop,landscape,or beautify the easement area in any way which would unreasonably increase
the costs to the Grantee of restoring the casement area and any private improvements therein:m
d Dig,tunnel or perform other forms of construction activities on the property which would disturb
the compaction or unearth Grantee's facilities on the right-of-way,or endanger the lateral support
facilities;or
e. Piast within fifteen(15)fee,of the right—
of-way-This easement shall run with the land described herein,and shall be binding upon the parties,their heirs,
W successors in interest and assigns. Grantors covenant that they are the law[uI owners of the shove
Pro s�and that they have 3 g and lawful right to execute this agreement.
INS' t sofG �
and
-. and _
and
and
REFRFSFNI&Tr-t rQf nF A F, .,»n4Mi1
STATE OF WASHINGTON )
SS
COUNTY OF KING )
I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Ospiel E. Shane and
signed this instrument, on oath stated that heAdiefdraft was/wm authorized to execute the instruntery
and acknowledged it as the Pmsident and of
RaKac. Inc. to be the free and voluntary act of such party/parties for the uses and
purposes mentioned in the instrument.
Dated t y A-/ .��.
Notary Public in and for the$tat
of Washington residing at_
My appointment expires:
utw'.'E..ei'
sheet 2 a 3
Coe".F.
cif».M�en q3_&rn
. `91�'w^' ,fy r�,s'M' '•+P'�1wr n�L-`.a.�'�-.ay.:_T!T,"�y{RI.Tn{�o+n•
�t �t
,�. EXHIBIT"A"
CITY OF RENTON-COTTONWOOD LIFT STATION
TEMPORARY EASEMENT- LEGAL DESCRIPTION
Tnat portion of Government Lot 8 and 9 and the dry river bed between SR-169
(Renton-Maple Valley Highway)and the Cedar River all within Secticn 17,Township 23
North, Range 5 East, Willamette Meridian, in King County, Washington described as
follows:
Beginning at the east quarter comer of said Section 17; thence S 01'02'22" W along
the east line of said Section 17 a distance of 838.43 feel; thence N 88'57'38" W
1081,42 feet to the southwesterly margir of SR-169(Renton-Maple Valley Highway)as
condemned by the State of Washington in King County Superior Court Cause No.
761406 and the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; thence S 67'17'55" W 42.75 feet;
thence S 34'14'25" W 155.02 feet; thence N 24'59'05" W 83.19 feet; thence
N 44'56'50" E 88.86 feet; thence . 45'4501" E 18.86 feet; thence N 67'17'55" E
11.21 feet; thence N 38'28'35" E 65.00 `set to said southwesterly margin; thence
southeasterly along said margin to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING,
CTNWICUO
00
aL-
Ln
C,
1T
t
h
i
I
)
vmev M9nagem 11415 NE 1291h Stm
MROATM
Crvl Erg,ne ng Kir4l .W irgkn 900'
unG Su^'^i'^9 20E 921-0M8
laW sv Menn,rp 1 60 _S W56
Emronmblal Ares FAX M5 921-JIe1
TRIAD JOB#e2-00-02
September 1, 1992
EXHIBIT "A"
CITY OF RENTON-COTTONWOOD LIFT STATION
LIFT STATION EASEMENT-LEGAL DESCRIPTION
That portion of Government Lot 8 and 9 and the dry river bed between SR 169
(Renton-Maple Valley Highway)and the Cedar River all within Section 17,
Township 23 North, Range 5 East, Willamette Meridian, in King County,
Washington described as follows:
Beginning at the east quarter comer of said Section 17;thence S01'02'22'W
along the east line of said Section 17 a distance of 838.43 feet; thence
N88057'38'W 1081.42 feet to the southwesterly margin of SR 169(Renton-Maple
Valley Highway)as condemned by the State of Washington in King County
Superior Court Cause No 761406; thence S67'1T55"W 92.62 feet; thence
S48"18'40"E 23.70 feet; thence N83'1T39"W 30.29 feet;thence N67°1T55"E
12.44 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BECINNING thence S67°17'55"W 30.00 feet;
thence N22`42'05"W 20.00 feet; thence N67-17'55"E-0.00 feet to a point which
bears N22°42'05W from the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING;thence S22042'05"E
20.00 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING.
Written By: BTF
Checked By:WVS
i
� ,L LY0
o"Fs aye
I
J
. . .
I
ki
• MM■ E / UW Menapartrem m i 12&h Svee�
CA Enq�nwnng KlWaM Vl hlrwmn BB014
lark'Sumsying I e21d 17
E llae Planmrp t e00 68 QI"
EnrronmeAel AnaFyvis FA%ZGB e2rJ481
TRIAD JOB p 92-083-C2
September 1,1992
1
EXHIBIT "B"
CITY OF RENTON-COTTONWOOD LIFT STATION
PERMANENT PIPE EASEMENT-LEGA'. DESCRIP1lON
That portion of Government Lot 8 and 9 and the dry river bed between SR 169
(Rentun-Maple Valley Highway)and the Cedar River all within Section 17,
Township 23 North, Range 5 East,Willamette Meridian, in King County,
Washington described as follows:
Beginning at the east quarter corner of said Section 17;thence S01'02'22"W
along the east Ilne of sai 1 Section 17 a distance of 838.43 feet, thence
N88'57'38"W 1081,42 feet to the southwesterly margin of SR 169(Renton-Maple
Valley Highway)as condemned by the State o. Washington in King County '•
Superior Court Cause No. 761406 and the TRu_POINT OF BEGINNING,
thence S67°17'55"W 92.82 feet, thence S48°18'40"E 23.70 feet;thence
N83617'39'W 30.29 feet;thence N67017'5 E '2.44 feet;thence N22°42'05'W
16.50 feet;thence N67°17'55"E 72.64 feet, thence N18'46'27"E 20.65 feet to said
southwesterly margin;thence southeasterly along said margin to the TRUE
POINT OF BEGINNING.
t
Written By: BTF
Checked By WVS t
S F,
Q 6�WN'N1, 'oc0
4 c
e
fanaaa,aa r,s
V�/sz
nag
LaM w ftn ng ntl5 NE 12@It SYtMI '
ow Eng~'N K.MW ,W,st�.rgw 98OU
WM�urveyi^9 206 921dd�e
S' 17. Use flanmrp t B00♦96QI56
FrmmnmenlJ lnolrys FR%20fi 92t.Wt
TRIAD JOB•92-083 02
September 1,1992
t
EXHIHIT "C"
1 CITY OF RENTON-COTTONWOOD LIFT STATION
i
TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT -LEGAL DESCRIPTION
i
That portion of Government Lot 8 and 9 and the dry river bed between SR 169
(Renton-Maple Valley Highway and the Cedar River all within Section 17,
Township 23 North, Range 5 Bast,Willamette Meridian, in King County,
Washington described as follows.
Beginning at the east quarter corner of said Section 17,thence S01'02'22"W
along the east line of said Section 17 a distance of 838.43 feet, thence
N88°57'38'W 1081.42 feet to the southwesterly margin of SR 169(Renton-Maple
Valley Highv.,ay)as condemned by the Slate of Washington in King County
Superior Court Cause No. 761406 and the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING, thence
S67°17'55"W 42.75 feet,thence S34"14'25'W 155.02 feet,thence N24`59'05"W
83.19 feet,lhol Ice N44°56'50"E 88 86 feet;thence S45°45'01"E 18.86 feet,
thane N67017'55"E 11,21 feet;thence N38°2e'35"E 65.00 feet to said
southwesterly margin,thence southeasterly along said margin to the TRUE
POINT OF BEGINNING.
Written By. BTF
checked By WVS
EY T.F
m.Q
VAL LAtp�$
nw�s i�b�
L
1 '
i
PROPOSED EASEMENT RELEASE
�o
` yo
� STONEWAY /
SE 114 SEC 17, TWN 23 N, RNG 5E, W.M.
BIN
9
REc . e'mas
MAP LEGEND
f� i nYlLxl q H H1N(p M/]1JJW
�[wlxw Ci � I SOG.YN 10! P[1,.Y0
�vwmx,r u I.ov.wu r�s Klux,o
® CM}tRtD twYHwl q K 41fA9➢MI UII]]!
DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING/BUILDINGIPUBLIC WORKS
4�e
py !' rF•'a S 4H'
�v
�r
�1
O D EASEMENT
. RELEASE
. 9
4:
•
STONEWAY
BINGO
WORKS
y
•
r
x
L i
Y^
CITY OF RE11TON
E' MEMORANDUM
DATE: February 14, 1992
TO: Councilmemher Jesse Tanner
Utilities Committee Chair
Councilmember Bob Edwards
Councilmember Timothy J.Schlitzer .t
FROM: Jim Hanson-Board of Public Works Chairman
SUBJECT: Release of Easements Cottonwood Lift Station Replacement -
The Board of Public Works reviewed the above-subject and recommends approval for
complete release of easement of recording number AF86311736, partial release of
easement of recording number AFN 5094983, and in the best interest of the City the
retention of easement AFN5133433. Board minutes are attached for vour information.
If you have any further questions,please give me a call.
JH:mbt
Attachments
pc: Mike Benoit -
BWS/relate/92/coon
I
1
� iJ
v
CITY OF RENTON
MEMORANDUM
DATE: January 14, 1992
TO: Marilyn Petersen,City Clerk
FROM: Mike Benoit,Project Manage-ash
SUBJECT: City Request for Release of F�ts;u recorded
under AF•'a 5094983,5133433,and 6311736 in
conjunction with the Cottonwood Llft Station
Replacement
We currently have a project to replace the existing Cottonwood Lift Station with an up-
dated facility, Following completion of the new faciLty, and recording of new
easem, the existing easements will no longer be necessary. We request that these
existing�ents be released simultaneous to the recording of t'te new easements. In
addition,we request that the fees associated with the release action be waived,as this is
a city initiated project. We will route the request for release of easement to all outside
utility companies and certain in-house departments for their review. Please refer the
matter to the Utility Committee and Board of Public Works to assure concurrence with
the request for release of easement.
We have attached copies of the easement documents to be released,a map showing the
easement areas,and the preliminary easement plan.
We have attached an agenda bill for your use. If you have any questions, please advise.
Thank you.
91426.txX'NE D/A
'AMETRO
Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle
Exchange Building • 821 Second Aye. Seattle,WA 98104-1598 (206)6M-21(x)
September 15, 1993 90600
I
13-2.12.27
i
Omega Contractors
P.O. Box 430
Duvall, WA 98019
Subject: AENTON Cottonwood Lift Station - Casing Proposal
r
Dear Frank:
Your proposal faxed September 14, 1993. has been reviewed and
approved with the following comment. Metro must inspect and approve
construction involving the casing, pipe support inside the casing,
annular grouting, and Kor-N-Seal boot installation.
If you have any questions concerning these matters, please contact me
at 684-1707.
i
Very truly yours,
Eric Davison
L.P.A. Coordinator
Ed:jrd
Attachments' Casing installation sketch
CC: City of Fenton - Dave Christensen
e 3"L REVISE.() C-ONNEC-7 icrl To Mer f�s� Mrl rk Xio I6
13`{ OMEcvA c.oKmP—Ac-TvP`S TO pEScRIISE 'TI-IF USE ;
A Sod, c-A5INU IN LIEU of OPEN c-L r . i
i
�— — - log CAS itycq
coNTl'.ou-EO DE.NSiTY e
8u JZ1. PIPE ,�
f
s
SPAct:.�SK�p EANpEC 10 Fl i�'E
6
,', KoR.-N� SEAL Snob- 12W
12 45 c41eE O&ILLEO H01-f
Ali 1',
k
YY 1
d X
i� i
e YSNC»sp y.•:
Augur -1,1993
Mr.Dave Christensen
CITY OF RENTON
200 Mill Avenue S
Renton,WA 98055
Subject. Cottonwood Lift Station Replacement
Dater Dave:
Per your instruction,attached are three revised contract documents for execution by the City.
If these documents are acceptable, ploase have them signed and return one copy for our files.
If you have questions,please contact me.
Sincerely,
\ R112 ENGINEERINGG,,cP../S. `
ITerri Hooper
' Office Manager
I
Y
i
c�
RH2 ENGINEERING,PS. --
sm,i l istti Avenue N.k • butte 2(X) opponunav Building • aid,nond,WA 4tk12
(206)869-1488• (206)463.0241 • P4X(206)869-7769
3rrMETRO
Mumcipality of Metropolitan Seattle
Exchange Building • 821 Second Ave. • Seattle,WA 9811M 1598 • (206)681-2100
August 3, 1993 90563
13-2.12.27
Public Works Department
lttg.City of RentonlIFT,,
200 Mill Avenue S. tJ 4
Renton, WA 98055
i;Ua 5 1993
Attention: Dave Christensen CITY Of RENTON
Engineering Dept.
Sanitary Sewers -
Cottonwood Lift Station
The Municipality has reviewed the approved drawings for this
project and gives its final approval subject to the conditions listed
below.
1. Mr. Eric Davison (phone 684-1707) shall be notified at least
two working days prior to construction, in lieu of Rich Putney.
2. Plans for dewatering adjacent to Metro facilities shall be
submitted to Eric Davison for review and approval at least five
, tys prior to construction.
3. All other conditions are as listed on the preliminary approval
letter, dated January 24, 1992, to David A. De',a of RI-12
Engineering.
Very truly yours,
UIV
Eric Davison
L.P.A. Coordinator
Attachments: Preliminary approval letter dated January 24,1992
Y
cc: Mark Miller - R112 Engineering
t
t
Pr
4�
:�CRIETRO
�� h4uninpahty of MetrOPOBtan Seattle
Exchange Building • 821 Second Ave. • Seattle,WA 98104-1598
� •r
January 24, 1992
� erin RH2 Engir g, P.S.
8363 - 15oth tv enue N.E.
i
Suite 200, D,.,.-rtuvi' 3uilding
Redmond, Washington 52
Attention: Mr. David A. Della
Sanitary Sewers -
�I rnttonwonel Lift Statinn
The Municipality has reviewed your preliminary drawings for
the subject project. Final approval will be given, subject
to the conditions below, when the City of Renton submits this
project to Metro for approval,
1. Mr. Rich Putney of this office (phone 684-:[91) shall be
notified at least two working days prior to construction
in the vicinity of Metro's Cedar River Interceptor,
Section 1.
2. During construction, no debris shall be allowed to enter
Metro's MH R10-16.
3. The manhole shall be unloaded all around or structurally
supported during construction to avoid unbalanced soils
loading.
4. Plans for dewatering adjacent to Metro facilities shall
be submitted to Mr. Rich Putney for Metro review and
approval at least five days prior to construction.
5. The connection to the manhole shall not be backfilled
until it has been inspected and approved by Metro.
k 6. Metro does it guarantee the location, diameter, or
invert elev.tion; therefcre, a field verification is
recommended prior to construction.
J
x v �
i
i •
I I
i RH2 Engineering, Inc.
January 24, 1992 tititi[
Page Two ,
it Y.
7. The new connection to the new manhole shall be made by >•
core drilling and use of Kor-N-Seal Boots as distributed
by P.I.P.E., Inc., 5601 South Orchard, Tacoma, *'
Washington 98409, (206)623--7772. S ;
8. The connection shall be plugged and not put
until the tributary system has been cleaned,1 inspectednto , •,J' 3;
tested, and approved by the City of Renton. ..
Upon completion of the project,P j please furnish the
j Municipality with a copy of the test results. a^�1
!
vet t I1 YnY,o/urs,
L% N� ti
Richard H. Putney ., e
Facilit4 Program Manager
r RRP:jrd
8
i ,. If,l,
r. •
.. Y.
�a
RH2 ENGINEERING,P.S. ti 2�
ER1 2
8383158th Avenue N.E., Suite 200 Lu, �0"' 4Q/.l�f.'c llll��r,�l�!1 •j
REDMOND.WASHINGTON 98052
(2D6)869.1488 ,r
DATE: 7/29/93 JOB NO. 191-068 y„
TO City of Renton
ATTENTION: Dave Chriatenser.
200
Hill Ave. Sn RE: Left Washington No. 2
Renton,
St
Renton, WA 98055 Lift Station
i
I
WE ARE SENDING YOU THE FOLLOWING:
x Attached Under Separate Cover Vie:
StrapLDrawings PNnts Plana I Samples SpeoBketbns '�..
�---
Copy of Letter _ _—Change Order Ottter
CCPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION
i1 7/16/93 Pea-Cons[oc[ion Maaunq Minutes -
LEI
THESE ARE TRANSMITTED AS CHECKED BELOW
For approval Approved As s..ombtsd n+submit coplas for approval
z For your use Approved a noted Submit ooples for distribution
As requested Returned for corrections Return oonocted Prints
For review and wmwr.i
For Bid.Due:-- Prints returned attar loan to us
REMARKS
I
a
COPY TO: -- SIGNED: Mark Miller, Staff Engineer
nEM�9t.161 aKgµSYii.�9
°1
� i
a.
i
{I City of Rento,: C O PY
1992 Lift Station Improvements
Cottonwood Lift Stations - Schedt.le A
Pre-Construction Meeting Minutes
July 16, 1993- 1:00 PNt
Persons in Attendance:
Mark Miller RH2 Engineering
David Christensen City of Renton
Mike Benoit City of Renton
Mark B. Wetherbe, City of Renton
Ron Shaffer City of Renton
Gail L. Morrison City of Renton Sewer Department
Gordon Wagstev Omega Contractors
Frank Poselewaite Omega Contactors
Lorren Loveless Washington Natural Gas
Karen Sharpe Puget Power
1 INTRODUCTION AND SIGN-IN
II TECHNICAL ISSUES RELATED TO UTILITIES
A. Existing Utilities r
' 1. pager Power
The new service that will be installed by Puget Power will be at no cost
to the City. Puget Power anticipates approximately 6 to 8 hour power
outage to complete the work. Puget Power commented that the 90 day to
complete statement in their letter does not apply to this job. Puget Power
I will be responsible fnr notifying local people that there will he a power
outage.
i
2. Washington Natural Gas
Washington Natural Gas has a 3 foot deep intermeiiate pressure (45 psi)
4 inch wrapped steel pipe running down the middle of Maple Valley High-
. r
ur„nawni-Iu
I
way. The only comment that they voiced was that if we broke into the
line or broke the wrap that they be notified to come out and mr0r.
3. US West
Did not attend.
' 4 TO Cable
I
Did not anenc.
i
B. Schedule of Electrical Rork
t. Puget Power Schedule
Puget Power requested that they be given a 2 week notice prior to the
beginning of their work.
r
2. Time Limit to Perform Work
No time limit to complete transformer switchover.
ID ADMINISTRATIVE ISSUES
A. Notice to Proceed `
1. NTP;ever was issued on Jul 14.
2. July 26, 1993 is first chargeable work day.
3. 180 wor' g days to complete.
B. Schedule of Values
The schedule of values will be the same as that were submitted for the Lake
Washington No. 2 Station.
- 2 - v®.�aioamn'�as
�J
A +Q:3$
i
C. Inspection Respc^,ibilities
1. RH2 Responsibility
R112 will have the same responsibility that they had during tht .ike
Washington Lift Station. This inspection responsibility involves inspecting
all electrical and mechanical work.
2. City of Renton Ruponsibility r, .
Mark Weatherbee with the City of Renton will be responsible for all earth -<
iwork and structural inspection. The same responsibility that he had at �- k
Lake Washington Lift Station.
3. Renton Electical hisrecior for All Electrical Work
't'.'.
Davy Christensen has the elxrical permit for the Cottonwood Lift station.
Dave has suggested that we have an on-site meeting to driermine what '-
Omega',plan is for installing electrical equipment. This could avoid any ;.
construction delays due to the clecuical work. The City of Renton •:'n
electrical :nspector would be involved a, this meeting.
D. Access
1. Vehicular and pedestnan to Riviera Apartments and office buildings a.all
times. Omega Contractors was made aware that they must keep the
roadway access to ire Riviera Apartments and the office buildings at all
j times. Mike Benoit, with City of Renton, made the suggestion that we
II notify the people in those offices and spa ..ents of the construction that
will be going on and for them to seek alternate routes. This notification
could be in the form of a sign in front of the construction or notices on
doors.
E. Highway Permit
1. Traffic Control Plan
i
It will be Omega Contracto-'s responsibility to mbmit a traffic control plan
to the City of Renton for epproval. Dave Christensen suggested that I or
2 day turn around will be needed to obtain approval.
2. Hours of Work
The hours of work while icing construction in the Maple Valley highway
3 -
veM:noawv,-�av
1
t h
1 . P
i
ry{_, will be from 8:30 AM a 3:00 PM. The traftic control plan will indicate _
the exact times that they will be able to work in the street. It was
suggested by the City that Omega Contractors work during the late hours
of the evening or early morning. This would be acceptable under the noise
ordinance that is currently in effect during the Maple Valley construction.
3. Road Repair
If concrete is encountered underneath the paving, the City stated that
Omega could have the option of placing back concrete or submitt4ng on
a CDF alternative.
r
F. Metm Connection
Lakeside Industries is currently under contract to overlay the highway starting on
Monday,August 2, 1993. The City requested that Omega Contractors look into
the possibility of connect;.ng to the Metro manhole prior to the overlaying.
r`mega's comment to that was that it would he difficult to perform in such short
notice, but they would look into the possibility. Dave Christensen is going to
contact ft State to determine if they can get a week wension before the paving
work s— .
f. Permit
We were unsure weather 1:1-12 had obtained the permit. I stated that I
would check back at the office to see if we had obtained the permit, and �.
if not, I would start filling out the paperwnrk to get ;his accomplished. t
Dave Christensen stated that he did not think it would be a problem
because it is such a standard process.
} 2. Coordination
3. Scheduling
G. Schedule
We requested that Omega submit a new schedule if the metro connection changed
their planned schedule.
H. Submittals
I. List of Items That Are Outstanding
I
A list of outstanding submittals was given to Frank.
i
i
5 . - 4- yawn rowev��
t)
ey4yi qq '�
-
i M. 1
Mi
2. Electrical MCC Submittal `
t
r ,a,
i L Change Orders
k
It was restated by Dave C'Itristensen that any change Orden should be approved, `r `
either verbally or by written notice before the work be performed.
J. Payment
Omega plans to keep the current pay schedule that they are working on for the
Lake Washington No. 2 Station.
K. flours of Wori:
Hours of work will be between the 7 AM to 5 PM, �U'cpt for work that will be
done in the roadway.
L. Temporary Water Supply
i
Omega was made aware that they would need to get a double check valve
i assembly mid a water meter if they were going to use any of the City water
hydrants.
i
i
IV TECHNICAL ISSUES
f
No topics were specifically disccssed under this topic.
i
V LAKE WASHINGTON ELECTRICAL
Puget Power is tentatively scheduled to begin the switchout of the transformer equipment
on August 17, 1993. Karen requested to be informed if that date is delayed. Omega
suggested that the 240-480 voit switchover should be complete in approximately three
weeks. The City is anxious to get the station operating at 480 volts from the reliability
standpoint. The question was asked if we could have both 480 and 240 V at the station.
The answer was no.
i
I uwnmu.rn'rte
i
Y
CITY OF RENTON
Pre-Construction Conference
Sign-In Sheet.
Monday,July 26, 1993- 1,.00 PM
1992 Lift Station Improvements ;
Schedule A Cottonwood Lift Station
Organization
1• a css ;(, Zz
4-LZnj
2.
3.
4. Wc
a R�Yz
R/O .dW.PA
7. F��..E P ZT
S. x 235-3537
10. 'yz�' fT ., ..
11.
12
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
lg.
a�
T y
-> CITY OF RENTON
24 IN Planning/Building/Public We Department
Earl Clymer, Mayor Lynn Gutteunn,Adminlstrstor
rrr
i r.
I
December 9, 1992
Mr. Dan Shane
RAMAC. Inc.
P.O. Box 653
Renton WA 98057
SUBJECT: TEMPORARY EASEMENT FOR COTTONWOOD LIFT STATION
REPLACEMENT
a
Dan,
Pursuant to our telephone conversation, enclosed is a copy of the temporary eas finent for
your execution. We have included both the corporate and individual signature pages.
The legal deseript in is the one shown as the construction easement on the plans you have.
It is the City's intent to set a monument at the new lift station and describe the permanent
easement from that obvious point. The permanent easement will be as shown on the plans
you have.
Please execute the easement, using the second page appropriate to the legal ownership of
your parcel, and return them to me.
If you have any Questions, please call me at 277-6206.
Very truly yours.
Michael A. Benoit
Wastewater Utility Engineer
RAMACESMIMAaif
AVaclrnanM1
i a
200 Mill .Avenue South - Renton, Washington 99055 '
4 "> CITY OF RENTON
Office of the City Attomey
Earl Clymer. Mayor f�J.Warms
MEMORANDUM
tt�019
y
To: Mike Benoit,Utility Systems Division DEC 3 1992
i
From: Lawrence J. Warren,City Attorney CITY CF RENTON
Date: December I, 1992 Engmneer1`19 Dept,
Subject: Temporary Cottonwood Easement
I have reviewed the above-referenced document and have the following comments.
At the beginning of page 2 there is an incomplete sentence The se.fence should begin with
words such as 'This temporary easement is" or "The temporary casement and the permanent
easement are"
On page 2, items 2d and 2 e contain double negatives. Eliminate the word "No"and make the
active words verbs,i e. Dig,Blast,etc.
i - t�.h"vtti1
Lawrence 1. garren
LJW:as.
cc. Mayor Earl Clymer
A8-91-49.
a
a
Post Office Boa 626 100 S 2nd Street-Renton,Washington 98057-(206)255-8678
cs CITY OF RENTON
'a Planning/Building/Public Works Department
Earl Clymer, Mayor Lynn Gullmuea,Admlulatmtw
October 12, 1992
Mr.Dan Shane
RAMAC,Inc.
P.O.Box 653
Renton WA 98057
SUBJECT: EASEMENT FOR COTTONWOOD LIFT STATION REPLACEMENT
Dan.
I had Triad re-plot the exhibit drawing(copy enclosed)for the easement we are discussing. They turned
on the layers that pi,)led the physical features they picked up on their survey. If you overlay this map with
the RH2 Engineering site plan(copy enclosed). you can line up the manhole east of the nodh part of the
apartment buildings and the Metro manhole in Maple Valley Highway. The easement is not adjacent to
any property comers so none were located as pan of the survey I have also included coples of three
pages from the survey notes.
As previously discussed, in exchange for this new 1900 square tool easement,the City will release all of
one 2000 square root easement (Rec. 06311736)a xd a 2100 square foot portion of a second easement
(Rec. 05094983), as shown on an enclosed copv of an 11" x 17" drawing. The City Attorney has
completed his review so I have also included an original easement document ready for execution.
Because we have to provide secondary containment for this lift station at the time it is replaced, it is our
opinion that building the new station adjacent to the existing and "swapping"easements will be the most
efficient and least dismpting to your tenants.
We are preparing the bid documents for distribution with a scheduled date of November 4, 1992, for the
submittal and opening of the bids. We would like to have the easement executed by that date. Your
prompt response is appreciated
For your use. I have also enclosed a copy of an old Stoneway survey I came across If you have any ,
questions,please call me at 277-6206
Very tmly yours.
Michael A.Benm -
Wastewater Utility Engineer
SHANESMT;MAa It
An¢hmems
200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055
-+.w...rw:--wxax.+l♦w.yrawaaww�+.,..._
a
s
c i
f
r'�
PLAONI■IIB/ BURIM PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT titY p
MUNICIPAL BUILDING 2OO MILL AVE.SO. RENTON,WASH. QB055 G •�
UTILITY SYSTEMS DIVISION-235-2631
TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS DIVISION - 235-2620
TO. So.�t� �c sseQ I OOTE: 913/VZ m NO _
Corn-�•oo0O 4RT a'JVFr:aJ :CIJ G<-/.Y>
ATTN:
GENTLEMEN:
WE ARE SENDING YOU o ATTACHED 0 UNDER SEPARATE LAVER VIA THE FOLLOWING :TENS:
o SHOP DRAWINGS o PRINTS D REPRODUCIBLE PLANS u SPECIFICATIONS
o COPY OF LETTER
COPIES DATE NUMBER DESCRIPTION
I
i ^644j< Q<V_J •fF ATTJc w:lO A.CGJ<
m 2 c.
<f
THESE ARE TRANSMITTED AS CHECKED ELLON:
❑ FOR APPROVAL o APPROVED AS SUBMITTED o RESUBMIT _ COPIES FOR APPROVAL
D FOR YOUR USE o APPROVED AS NOTED o SUBMIT _ COPIES FOR DISTRIBUTION
❑ AS REQUESTED o RETURNED FOR CORRECTIONS ❑ RETURN CORRECTED PRINTS
o FOR REVIEW AND COMMENT o _ 0 PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US
COPIES TO:
SIGNED _
TITLE
IF ENCL%UAES ARE MDT AS NOTED, KINDLY NOTIFY US AT ONCE
R
i
V/gb:l AA Mltbp Itd15 N( t$91tt ymel Civil En{ptnen,,�q K� WUMigion 1:ge3d
E�„omt,an.i M+h=•� cox zas ezt�dei
TRIAD JOB p 92-083-02
September 1, 1992
CITY OF RENTON-CO] i ONWOOD LIFT STATION
TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT-LEGAL DESCRIPTION
1
That portion of Government Lot 8 and 9 and the dry rivet bed between SR 169
(Renton-Maple Valley Highway)and the Cedar River all within Section 17.
Township 23 North, Range 5 East. Willamette Meridian, in King County,
Washington described as foCows:
Beginning at the east Quarter comer of said Section 17, thence S01*02'22"W
along the east line of said Section 17 a distance of 838.43 feel, thence
N88"57'38"W 1081.42 feet to the southwesterly margin of SR 169(Renton-Maple
Valley Highway)as condemned by the State of Washington in King County
Superior Court Cause No. 761406 and the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING,thence
S67"17'55"W 42.75 feet;thence S34°14'25"W 155.02 feet;thence N24"59'05"W
83.19 faet; thence N44°56'50"E 88.86 feel;thence S45°45'01"E 18.86 feel,
thence N67°17'55"E 11.21 feet,thence N38°2935"E 65.00 feet to said
southwesterly margin;thence southeasterly along said margin to the TRUE
POINT OF BEGINNING.
1
Written Byy RTF
Checked By WVS
` c
�. p
i �O��of tisp���i
r rl�� � y
CQ
P�
� t
nwntz'saa 93
e t/9L
f,
}144 g}
rt
n
u y
{
1
{
CITY OF RENTON
I
MEM0RANDVFA
DATE: Jwte 18, 1992
I
TO Mike Benoit
FROM: Mike Dotson
f
SUBJEM Cottonwood Lift Station Easement
We ,uve deterntitted that insufficient data was provided to adequately compose a
suffcicnt legal description for the subject Udt Station casement. It is necessary to
provide a basis of bearings tied to the section subdivision of the public land surreys.
If you have any questions,please advise. Thank you.
92-i09.DOQMDD,,M
{
v
CITY OF RENTON
MEMORANDUM
DATE: ]me 18, 1992
TO: Mike Neooit
i
FROM: Mike Dotson
SlJWCT: Cottonwood Lift Station Easement
We have determined that insufficient data suss provided to adequately componc a
sufficient legal description for the subject lift Station easement. It is accessary to
provide a basis of bearings tied to the section subdivision of the public land surveys.
I
If you have any questions,please advise. Thank you.
i
V1109.1%X:/Mmn/T�
j - "-..v.,,.w., w. __.._a •_... ... _ —�
I
M I Ktr
j CITY OF RENTON
`r Administrative Services
Earl Clymer, Mayor Dan Clements,Director
— J
Y
January 22, 1992
Mr. Dan Shane RAMAC, Inc.P.O. Box 651PIPE
Renton, WA 98057
Re: RAMAC Street Vacation, VAC-001-89; Bronson Way North,; Or RLNTON
[har Mr. Shane: Erp_ipnrrinR DFpt.
On January 20, 1992, the Renton City Council reversed its ear''-r de-ision to dismiss the
referenced application and instead referred the matter back h the 1: .1ity Systems
Division of the Planning/Building/Public Works Department .or continued discussions
with you on this matter.
For further information, please contact Dick Anderson, Utility Systems Manager, at 277-
6211.
Very truly yours,
�✓
Marilyn J. P s , Civic
City Clerk
235-2502
cc: Mayor Earl Clymer
Council President Kathy Keolker-Wneeler
Dick Anderson, Utility Systems Manager
David Tibbot, Technical Services
Dick---The city attorney has recommended that the ordinance be held in
the file. I will continue to track this item, but please make a note that
the ordinance has been prepared and is on f;le with the clerk.
Thanks much.
200 Mi!I Avenue South - Renton. Washinrt-n 9ROt5
f
i
I
14
�' -` t'T Of Renton PURCHASE ORDER
+--
ILL AVE 1 RREENtDN,WA 11 F5431 • , I411 000400 18 596 35 65 45005
4:005 5100 3.IE9a00
' INSTRUCTIONS P.O.DATE. '_EPTFNRER 15a 1094
t :ehd mvuwea m TRIPLICATE to Purchasing Olvlsron Qty of Ranton
2 All pncae are F,0.8.destination unle6a olherwlae ateleE
3 Indicate the Purchase Order NumMr Dn Invoice and ill Iahels Sr11P TO
4 Label Jill ahi 1
' pmene as h.pn ed on lne Purchase Order,and enclose P• airy Slip wrth each snlumenl
— Y'
? �062740 ------
I -RIAO ASSOCIATES
P 0 '�Lx 1324
ik1LLANn. wA •'bOtl 3-3 Jlti
(
�Q�AMITY UNIT DESCRIPiIDN UNIT PRICE ESTIAUTEO AMOUNT
.tee{{{{{♦N aided{{{pea H{H
• C N F I R M I N G
•{ A 0 0 a*HeeII{eee{{e{{y{a
LOTTDNAlOOD LIF1 STATION 3r 28 q.u0 3.2b9.00
I
•( I. tXE UNpER A
91GNE0 EdHEREBY CERTIFY UNDER
1'C1MlTV Gf PER1'MV LIUI LXE 1MTERuIS NAVE BEEN
E.RN15XEd, THE SERVII:ES RENDERED CR Ti-it IABpri
PERRq(YED AS DESCRIBED NEREW AND iXAi iYE LIMY
5 A JUST WE Arq UNPA10 OBLIGaT.ADAINSI THE
CITY GE REBTgI, a i AM U IIgRIZEO TD
AVIXENTIGTE AND CERPEYNCNAT To SAID CIABI
SIGNE
BLNG/8LOG/P18 vkS IJYILITY SYS
,� AOTEwRrzrD Br_ TOTAL Ill 3,289.00 _— --
ALPHA olueev
--_— -----.--.-i I w
tll W ry m i d L I dr 0!A fL N VI ry
^b^ I
I
I
1
a
I
.... r :..
RR �wso Poa�
'ASI��CIATES ��
€ x wmwxN
M• ROfii az,a,e�rex
I
Project: 92-083-00 CITY OF RENTON SURVEYING SERV Invoice No. 31800
i
September 11, 1992
CITY OF RENTON Page number I
200 MILL AVENUE SOUTH
RENTON MA 98055
ROBERT T. MAC ONIE, 1k.
L.�..
Billing Proect,Pe92-083-02ufT
CITTONWOOD TINTSSTA-LENGL LSC I
S6- - - --------------- -
Y OF
g //
' ____ -
RV l(i jRll'1��,YY,,M"711LL��!
PROFESSIONAL SCRVICES —
q Hours
Project Manager Amount
D17E 9-/j/- `10'� 2.50 237.50
Survey Field Supervise[ 1.00 65.00
Project Surveyor ��J�+1Eg i,WWL/GATE 19.50 1,365.00
2-Person Survey Crew -�lsLfl_ "0 V,+
7.00 644.00
3-Person Survey Crew 8.50 977.50
38.50 3,289.00 3,289.00
3 TASK TOTAL, 3,289.00
fir-� _ _
� _- 6S scOS S S �.5/ap �_
Project, -083-03 NE 4TN R/N SURVEY (PO f659581
---------
CITY RENTON SURVEYING SERV
�., PROFESSIONAL SERVI
Hours Amount
------
Project Manager 2.50 237.�.
Director of Surveying 37.0
Survey Field Supervisor 0 32.50
Project Surveyor 1.00 70.00
Survey CAD Operator 1.00 60.00
Survey Technletas 2.00 110.00
2-Person Survey Crew .50 322.00
___________
i1.0 872.00 872.00
\SK TOTALS - --872.00
A 1992
CITY OF RENTON
PUBLIC WORKS
alcrr MER SERVICES PAYMENT DUE UPON RECEIPr OF INVOICE
S I cM E� 'q vO Pob Ttt9
• IR�; CIATES EvtlSv�swq 1U°MYri0.WaN.5�980&i:�.
•°.:� Evm Use ae^�+9 (ABI Rt.nuB
E mivnee�l Mugaa 120E1 e2tJbt PA%
P.ajectt 92-083-00 CITY OF RENTON SURVEYING SERV Invoice No. 31900
September 11, 1992
Page number 2
_______________ --___-___-___..-_--________________________--._____ ..
Projc-t. 92-083-04 RESEARCH 4K NA BLVD CL #62681
CITY Of RENTON SURVEYING SER7
PROrESSIONAL SERVICES
_____________________ Houre Amount
Project Surveyor 4.00 280.00
j 4.00 280.00 280.00
i -----------
TASK TOTAL, 280.00
_. __________________________________________________________._-____________-----
TOTAL DUF THIS INVOICE, 4,441.00
.: y .s
PAYMENT DUE UPON RECEIPT OF INVOICE
I
J
. t
: i
,.._
of Renton PURCHASE ORDER T�xP D@l „o D ,p
17
- -----
YANfiB • REMON.WAAED55 NB151 ,.7 voV4T9 lc ,4r
(1PP)TJS1GtB -- 4SU6^ •..1\ 14w•5p
INSTRUCTIONS PO DATE. t")VEMBER ID♦ 14NA
1. Band In in TRIPLICATE to rWten,,W Pwtiion,City of Renton
R AN Wiuti me EO.B.aaeuntllon unleM other viee tittle,.
.T. kida"te-de%not"ee Order hhdat .on Invoke end.11 Ieoat, B W TO.
♦ IADtl All tinlpretntti es mWilli d on the Purchase Omer.and encl�
P•DKinp SUP vdtT secs
D274e -_--__--
TRIAD ASSOCIATES
P O '0% 332�
KIPLANI, NA "001$3-33<4
un —
OESCmR10NLwarr PRICE EBTIWTFD AMOUNT
!elHilgea Me!lN HM pl N!• � N
! C :` N f I R M I N 6
!eHlN!!He H p N!!!N!!!e!!
INV. 32Oi2 COTTIINN(JOU LIFT SlA
SUKVEYl N6 5EKYICLS 1•.A.:D CIIOf,m 1$t rs,% Ee
(]IV'OF RB(TON CEATRCA7gN
irE tx10Eg9pNeo 0o 41f dEgnry uvcen
r4WLLTY aE 1fAAgY TIMT The WATNMLS IYVE BEEN
fwMsxEO. THE SEKVCES KExocxfp m THE J,,,,
SAAIST A90EEWEFDN w/.NO TNT THE CIAY
I 1 JUBT plE AND IAiPAV oRAIATION AdMeET TT¢
pTY DE KlM1oN, ANo THAT I AM AIITNDMEEO TO
AuiMExI:GTE NIo,AATEY i0 UV LIMA
sIDNp LkU/6LUG/PUR MKS UTILITY S•)
r
AUTHOPUM are TOTAL III, 1tiA.5�
ALPHA _ o.ink all,
�
M K i __�—t G
MIN aIa IN ON , I
I
I I
fib. 68iS! S 14415�-
nq.a trep.�.. nenMa
E Ep,aMiq (M) SNY
tl� +9 �,VMw�mm O�peNe4p
ErManrWAM'ti Immt ez,.+.n RJI
Project, 92-083-00 CITY OF RENTON SURVEYING SERV Invoice No. 32052
November 12, 1992 .>
Page number 1
CITY OF RENTON
200 MILL AVENUE SOUTH
RENTON NA 98055
ROBERT T. MAC ONIE, JR.
B11 .1n9 Period, October let thru October 31st
-----------------------..-----_ - ------------
Project, 92-083-02 COTTONWOOD LIFT STA-LEGAL DESC
CITY OF RENTON SURVEYING SERV
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
--------------------- hours Amount
Project Surveyor 2.00 140.00
--------- ___-__-____
2.00 1e0.00 1e0.00
_--_---_--_ •
TASK TOTAL, 140.00
1 -__-_-__-_-
Exhibit preparatlon at the request of Nike Benoit.
--------------------------..____-_--___-_--_-------------------------------------
Projeet, 92-083-99 PRINTS & EIPENSES
CITY OF RENTON SURVEYING SERV
REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES
------------ --------- Amount
VELLUM PRINTS (24136) e.50
-___---_---
REIMBURSABLE TOTAL, 4.50 e.50
------TASK TOTAL, 6.50
---------- -----------
_
/,� CONCUR:. TOTA Dus Txxs IxvolcE, ua so
�(b�I L/ ...........
DATE
DATS
C1�S� I WO aS00S
i
� PAYMENT DUE UPON RECEIPT OF 0VO10E
1
t
,
f Y
L Y
� �5
R
6 1 PURCHASE ORDER
W 2 of Renton -
�2057 A21 u004 UO 18 596 35 65 A5005
DB ll ; eTTON ww.OeD55 4-0(:5 ,51430 9.U60.00
INSTRIKTIONS —� PO DATE. J'.tN[ 2♦ 1,91 4�Z1147 �d1NLE-,Ll .y�l td��
1. Send invol in TRIPLICATE 10%rchasn9 Division.City of Renton.
2. AN Prlaa An F.0.8 destination un*"otnmwix stated.
3, Indicate Me Purchase Orde!Nun6 on Invoice and all laws SHIP TO n G /\ — —L-�r�0
T. LaWI all shnmenla a. specified on the PiHchi se Doer,and enclose V �� $0 78 1J\ c�
Pacalnq Slip wan each shipment.
I0681 BG
E142 ENGINEERING
$363 158TN AV NE Su1TE :00
' sLDNCNO. NA 96052
I
WIIEIIITY UNR DESCRIPTION UNIT PLAICE ESTIMATED AMOUNT
StttettMt Mte ttn•tett•Ne•+•
c C 0 N F I R N 1 N G
s tttttt•NtH tt^NNp Ntttlte
I
T
1 L.'. AL, 2-92 CAG 079-90 COTTONND 4,060.00 9,060.00
LIFT STLTIUN REPLACEMENT
I. ME UIOER}pNEC DO HEREBY CEN}M' UNDER
MMATY OF PE ARY.1w.1 THE WIEmMS NINE MEN
1 FIMMIE9.THE W..'- RT.DFf ED p1 THE UBCH
aERdNED All CE80111RED HFHEIN %No THAT THE CIAiM
IS A Ja6T DUE µD WIY'10 00(-IuATNM AGAINST THE
CITY DE KMON, AND TN..T ? AM AJTH0RQFn TO
M HEMHCATE AND CERTIFY TO>AID Cliffs.
I� EA:NERLNG/6LUG/PUB NNS UTILITY SYS
_A_ _
II _
AUTHORIZED BY , Zt N3ZfllAiNAiG� TOTAL , 9E0bu.00 ALPHA
f
i —
J
i�
,t
1
t
f Renton PURCHASE ORDER
71-�
98] e21 000400 45005 RENTb WA.BBDSSrol zgsmta 12,035.00
INSTRUCTIONS P.O.DATE. JANUARY ], 1992 JIf8l4.? Pu.IT I0,33kq
mvolce,In TRIPLICATE 10 PUrohesing DVision.Cny of Rent Do
O.are F.0.8.dsetinetion unties otherwise nTAHM
te un,Purchase Ortter Nunn Invoke and eR Labels SNIP TO
MI ZIP
as aPe;RMd 0H TPe Purchase Order,and enclose
PackiN Blip with v h shipment. ,A
068180 J n� 14 98 M�
i
RH2 ENGINEERING
8383 156TH AY NE SUITE 200 gO�Sd
REONCNO, WA 98052
Y-0
G�
OUANTITY lMT DESCRIPTION UNIT PRICE ESTIMATED AMOUNT a
as aaaa aaaaaaaa aaataaaa•aaaaaa _ —
a C O N F I R M I N G a
♦aH 41a NH aM aJa N Ma4 aa4U,H•
1 L.S. CAG 0T9-90, A00. 01-91, T.O.A 12,035.00 1Z,035.00
COTTONWOOD LIFT STATION
I.THE UNDEeSiGNEO DO HEREBY CERTIFY UNDER
eE.101 PENU.I.'H.T THE WTEII sHew 9Eg!
fURMSHED,THE SEANCE$RENpEREp OR THE LAIDA
FERFOnAEDAe CEy:Po9ED HE1Epl AND TNeT THE CLAY
5 e JUST.DUE.MO UNPAID DEW IGATIMI AWINET T1�
CA
PF adaf ANO Tee, I AM eUTUO1I1Ep, M
AUTHFeff"R AND CERTIFY TO MID CLAIM
P LOG/PUB MKS UTILITY SYS
NED
U
'AUT11ftmim, � TOTAL jP 12,035.00 a,w cast
A1PNA
AO 62n ST 9Ot S."
* te1-123.43
RH2 ENGINEERING, P. S.
SUITE 200
8383 158TH AVENUE NE
REDMOND, WA 98052
Invoice number 9815 l�
September 15, 1992
� ! Page number 1
Project 127.720.00 REN COTTONWOOD LIFT STATION
CAG-079-90 TASK ORDER NO. 4
CITY OF RENTON
CONCURRENCE
200 MILL AVENUE SOUTH DATE 4-/6Jlk
RENTON, WA 98055 I�N,LT�IArtaV--OaA'rT-"
14
R _
INC6EMENTAL BILL NO. :2
K{ BUDGET AMOUNT: $65,029.00
BILLED TO DATE: $65,029.00
REMAINING BUDGET: $0
n}Y
{ PROFESSIONAL SERVICES: Hours Rate Amount
4
PRINCIPAL E I%
Richard H. Harbert 1.50 113.187 169.78
' PROJECT MANAGER E VI
Daniel R. Ervin 13.00 $6.241 1, 121.13
PROJECT ENGINEER E IV
Tony V. Pardl 3.50 56.984 199.44
STAFF ENGINEER II
David A. De! la 69.00 44.885 3,097.07
cn
STAFF ENGINEER E I
1 Shannon A. Emerick 4.50 37.599 169.20
f i WORD PROCESSOR II
! Beverly Kay Heffington 5.00 29.923 149.62
K
III Robinson 3.50 28.622 100.18
xl
y ry
b
i(7 x1 y, j
a
i
,mt
A. �v
s
t.. :4'
1
Invoice number 9615
September 15, 1992
Page
Project 127.720.00 REN COTTONWOOD LIFT STATION number 2
... _________________________________________________________
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES: Hours Rite Amount
______
+1 SENIOR PROJECT PLANNER V
Gene Peterson 14.00 71.945 1,007.23
SERVICES TOTAL: it{ 00 6,013 65
-----------
REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES:
.r'. _ Amount
'
In-house CAD System Originals
955
Net Fee (12%) Salery.Overhea0 721.47
.64
-----
REIMBURSABLE TOTAL: 1,677.11
SUBCONSULTANT SERVICES
Amount
Consultant
-_________
7-29-92 GEO ENGINEERS, INC.
3,032.67
Consultants total : 3,032 67
i
Tc at Invoice S 10,723.43•
l
r
s
y
�y
' Usrr: (AII>
Cllc,it (AII)
Ptolor:l \v. : R t N 1:11.:'0.00
<Iln,."I 3>: (At I>
(Unu'.f d 1>: <AI I>
Wo rtted h): <AI I>
(unused 0: (At I>
<Ilnu,cd />: <At I)
g♦ (Unused A>: (AII>
w1';q.pX\ CUnu vA 9>: (A 11>
Date Thu 01-30-92 through f n 06 26 91. Hour:
02. 10�92 Beverly Kay Helfington 1.00
letler to Dewey longbof ) - 30 min.
folding drawings - 30 min.
02-2792 at ver iy Kay Air t t l rig ton 50
s Notice of Application For. (Cene).
:i
02-28 92 Beverly Kay Hetfington
Cottonwood Specs.
is
a 03-02-42 Beverly Kay Heffington
Updating Specs. for Cottonwood.
} 06-01-92 Beverly Kay Hetfington n'
letter to Tom Tobin.
02-06-92 Daniel R. Ervin
u
Preliminary review and etlils prior to City
review meeting.
02-06-92 Daniel R. Ervin 3.00
I Prepare for review meeting with Cily :fail .
02-07-92 Daniel R. Ervin b.00
Prepare for and attend 90% review meelinn
with Mike and Dave.
02 10-92 Daniel R. Ervin ;.00
Review and revise electrical panel Anagram:,.
Summarize review meeting with City "A"'
01-30-92 David A. Delta 0.50
Reviewed design with Projer.t manager.
tditted electrical logic diagram and other
drawings.
September 1!" low
Page 1
,f
Datc Ihu 01 30 1.2 lhrywyh 1 r of, .^f. 9: .. _Hours..
01 31-9: David A. Delta 3.00
Di tai led the fiberglass Brat Illy systom.
Od 111 91 David A. Delta 5.00
�w.fe improved 3D model of grating system.
Detailed fiberglass tank design tlrawing.
0; 03 92 David A. Della 3.00
Detailed fiberglass tank design drawing.
0? 04 92 David A. Della 8.00
Detailed 30 grating connee.tions and
fiberglass lank bottom. Continued editing
design drawings.
02-05-92 David A. Della 8.50
Detailed grating and ladde•s, Reviewed
design w' th Dan 6 Tony.
02-06-92 David A. Della 11.00
final touch-up detailing on fiberglass lank
and Structural details. Prepped for design
i review meeting.
0? nr 92 David A. Della 7.00
Final touch up of some drawing.. 90% design
review meeting with city. Prepared full set
of drawings for city.
02-10-97 David A. Della 2.00
Prepared easement plan to incorporatc
changes for electiical equipment.
02-17-92 David A. Della 0.50
Edified easement plan to clarity surveying
data for the legal description.
-„ 03,-04-92 David A. Della 0.50
Contacted geotechnt,:al engineer for proposal .
'f 03-05 92 D: id A. Della 1.00
Me. with geotechnical engineer to di:auss
proposal. z
03 09 92 David A. Della 0.b0
Reviewed and summarized deslg as.
�Ep September 15, 1992 Page
t..
y ;1 A
Daie Ilm 01 10 97 through I 1 1 06 ?h a;- flours
03 Y1 9,' 1)av Id A. Ile 1 1,, 1.00
Prepared soil: inve.1 igat inn propo ..,I .
0b-28-97 Dav I A. Delta 0.50
Fran' Contract letter preparation.
06.02 92 David A. Della 1.50
Prepared and plotted drawing. tot ;a, Is
i fives ll gatIon io l of mailer).
06-10 9.' David A. Delta 0.50
Cost i'.s t imate preparation.
06-7S 9? David A, Della 1.00
Easement reterertne to p operly carrier ,
06-26 97 David A. Della
�k'1"•'1 Easement plan prepatallon. 1.50
02-06-97 Gene Peterson 0.90
p Work on shoreline application for lilt
station.
02--09. 9? Gene Pelerson 1.75
Prepare SFPA Checklist for permit
appIl cations.
02-10-92 Gene Peterson
4.00
' Finalize 4nv ir'onmental Checklist. Compile
apPlicatiml el :ments and attachments. Phone
w/M. Benoit.
02-11-92 Gene Peterson 0.50
Finalize shoreline applic;ltlon form. Phone
w/Loreen Nicolay Cs Renton Development review
re:appiicatiun process. Talk w/D. Lrvin
re:Legal description requ i I ed for
application packet.
02-20-92 Gene Peterson 1.75
Compile shoreline application packet.
02-?l 9? Gene Peterson 2.50
Compile and file shorline permit.
September 15, 1992 Page 3
r
f
1 I
I
•. Dal o -.. Ihit 01. 3i1
- flu Ut s
02 91 Gene Pete,':en
Phone w/Mike 0enoit ro:riot lc- for shor e.l lnr�
permit. Pr epole draft nhti re. Meet r/1 .
NicoiAV re:noti Ce. Revi .e at ee for
Publication.
03 02 92 Gene Peterson d 50
Revise shoreline notice. Pr ep..re
t r an SIR ltIaI to V. Ilai I News.
03 05-92 Gene Peterson 0.50
Phone w/Paul fotsaudet (J Rentou re:� I PA.
project plans and L hotel lne Permit process.
IAX shoreline notice to Paul.
03 06-92 Gene Peterson 0.50
Gel shoreline notice from Valley Daily News.
Review permit status/ixsurt; w/Y,. Renui L
04-10-92 Gene Peterson 0.25
Phone w/ValICy Daily News re:Affidavit of
Put)l i ra: iOr' for Shot 01ine hermit.
0° 10 9' Gloria J. Pellibonc 0.25
WP-TRANSMIIIAL
02-11-92 Gloria J. Pettibone
WP TRANSMITTAL. TO MIFF 0015ON. D•25
04-07-92 Gloria .I. Pettibone 0.50
Memo to Dan's groin regarding file titles
for this prop-cl.
02-07-9t Richard N. fi,rbett 1.50
Reviewed Cottonwood Lift Station design,
constructabil i:y. potential change orders
and responses to remaining gho:tions.
01 JD-92 Tony V. Pa�dl 1.DO
Lift station o,,Ign.
1, 05-92 Tony V. Pardi 2.50
1,1 ft station this ign and review.
- 12- 10-92 Wendle Robinson 1.00
Typed text regarding Cottonwood Ilft station.
September 15. 1992
Paye 4
j
' Ina lc Ihu Ot. f0 tbI ough III oli iG 9: flours .
ri?-II s: Weed. Rolun;o❑
_ IYped appl scat IOn regarding COIIOnvOd
OF'-,'0 11 Wendio Robinson 1.00
I feed application for pit tonwood lift
oiet Ion. Iype lI Ansmi tt al 10 1aureen
Nlcolny And made e.opled of documents.
0S-:1 9i Weudie 1.00
.. TYRed cerlif iration of noli ficalion of
pr OI)etty owners. 'Yhed revlsrofls to
transmittal to I reen Nicolav and more
ropies of documevns to Ir An s m l tt.,l.
`.I 03-02 92 Wendle Robinson 0.50
Typed transmlltal to 'Andy March Iegard i rig
t egaI NO I re.
... _ ... . .. .To IAI; 107.SO
m
I
I
September 1!r, 199' p10e 5
t '
F �
i
tlscr: <AII/
Ghent: (AII>
Pro J'''I No.: 9I% 1.'//.Ilr,l-fu
<Ilmr.'d 9>: CAI1)
Wrin.r(I 4): (At I)
r (tlnrr•e-d S): (AI I)
(Unused C>: (AI I>
(Unused I>: (AI I>
(tlnusod e>: (At I)
(Unused li): <At I>
- Dale - Sat Df• ?/ 9: through Wed DI 79 77 Hours
t fl/ 16-91' David A. De la 3.60
Modrt red glal g •.unne ct ion s, pr a Ivor ed
specifieatnon:: for valves.
- OI- I/ 47 Shannon A. tmer,ek 4.E9
Completed design of concrete vault tension
connectors around perimeter , including plate
and bolt;. DO•Igned to resist bon.yant
for cc.s. (...
lotall. 8.00 tli.
MmMIMr F
r
i
..op nembar 15, 1997 Page t
9
I.
z
! .per. �,( +• f � � '
pill I
• .`d �A � �' Y�. t Y�'s' * .R it 'p - .. - 1�
4614
i
' N
. r
t '
. � r
I
• 1
4 r
•
a >�
r
i.
V
Ir'' +tt• `'f.v _. • n fa •i •r� y' tt 4b _ a •t - r ''..r�l�
i
STATE OF WASJ GTCN
DEPAr;MENT OF FCOLOGI"
Afar Stop PV-11 . rYynpw, Wishgfon tUX 711 . /2DN I59i W
June 2, 1992
4 �
On�4 Mr. Mark Beno^t
;1 City of Renton kaste Water Utility
200 Mill Avenue South
Renton, WA 98055
Re: City of Renton Permit MLUA 92-043;SM
'n City of Renton Waste Water Utility - Applicant
Shoreline Substantial Development Permit 41992-13348
Dear Mr. Benoit:
The subject Sh^reline Management Substantial Development permit has been
filed with this office by the City of Renton on May 18, 1942.
If this permit is not appealed to tha Shorelines Hearings Board on or
before June 17, 1992, authorized construction may begin. Other federal,
state, and local laws regulating such construction shall be complied with. Unless an a #J
ppeul fe filed, this letter consti[utsa final
notification of action on this permit.
Sincerely,
� a su
P sole le Trer ice
Permit Coordinator
Shorelinds and Coastal Zone
Management Program
PT:jm
cc: Kay Shoudy, City of Renton
1
r
o'
\ i
M1r� 8meit
e3 .> CITY OF RENTON
Planning/Building/Pablic Works Department
Earl Clymer, Mayor Lynn Gaminess,Administrator
May 15,1992
Ms.Pat Tnrlce
Permit Coordinator
Shmelaids and Costal Zone Management. rogram
L apartmsm of EcoloVy
Saran HJI,Saint Martins College
Olympia Washington 955046711
Reference: Shoreline Management Substantial Development Permit For Cottonwood Lift Station
Replacement,File No.LUA 92-443;SM:FCF
Dear Ms. Crerice.
Enclosed is the Shoreline Substantial Development Permit for the above reforencec; project. The permit
was issued by the City of Renton on May 15, 1992. Along with the Permit are enclosed the following
attachments:
r
Attachment Description
1. Copy of Onglnal Applicaron.
! 2. Affdavil of public notice/publication.
Site Plan and Vicinity Map.
4. E:ivironmemal Determination.
We are(ling this!final action with the Department of Ecology aiA the Attorney G!neral per WPC 173-14-
090. Please review this permit and attachments and call me at 2776167 9 you have any euesdons or need
adr`41nnal Information.
i
Sincerely..
Pau:D.Forsander,
Project Manager
cc D.Q.E.,NW District Office
>nomey General's Office _
C;:r �Renton.De eelopment Serviceb Division
C'ry of Renton,Tmnsportzt;on Systems
City of Renton,Utu'ry Systems
.ern
200 Mill 4venue South - Renton. Washlmmon 480:5
ai
� I
CITY OF RENTON
SHORELINE MANAGEMENT ACT OF 1971
PERMIT FOR SHORELINE MANAGEMENT
j SHORELINE SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT
1' APPUCATION NO.: LUA 924M;SM;ECF
DATE RECEIVED: February 2C 1992
DATE OF PUBLICATION. March 6 8 t3.1992
DATE APPROVED: May 15 1992
DATE DENIED: N/A
TYPE OF i ACTION O: {X) Substantial Development Fermit
{ I Conditional Use Perma
r I ] Variance Permit
Pursuant to Chapter 90.58 RCW,the City of Renton has granted a permit:
This action was taken on the lollowing application:
COPTONWOOD LIFT STATION REPLACEMENT
AF?LICANT. C'Ty of Renton Waste Water Utility
i
DEVELOPMENT DESCRPTION
Shoreline Gubstaatial Development Pennit for an underground sewage lift station to replace the
existing 30 year old Cottonwood sewage lift station serving the 9Neria Apartments and nearby
businesses. The existing lift station has niched the end of ins useful life and as a result has an
increasing chance of d9veloping leaks. It also does not have secondary containment. The
re{..4acoment would have secondary containment and would be located to the southwest of the
existing iacirt-V. The proposed development is located with.n the Cedar River and/or its associated
wenards.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: See Attachment
SEC-TWNP-R: Section 17 of Township 23 N.,Rarge 5 E.,W.M.
1
WITHIN SHORELINES OF: Cedar River e
STATE SHCPEUNE OF
SIGNIFICANCE(YES/NO): No.
ENVIHONMENT DESIGNATION: Urban
APPLICABLE MASTER PROGRAM: Jity of Renton
s
�f
VINX
-
CITY Of PENTON SHORELINE_SUBSTANIi L DEVELOPMENT PERMIT cero'w Da staeoe l.eleP.Pw.n
May 15,1992 Peg.2
The fUlowicg section/panq of the Master Program Is applicable to the development
5.04 Urban Environment,page 22.
7.18 Local Utilities-Spe-Hicatlons,page 40,
jDevelopment of this pmjent shall be undertaken pursuant to the following:erns and conditions
None Required.
j
Note to Applicant: This project small comply with the City of PenionS Proposed Aquifer ?r:
i Protection Ordinance.
ik f
This permit Is granted pursuant to the Shoreline Management Action of 1971 and pursuant to the following:
1. The issuance of a Ilcense under the Shoreline Management Act of 1971 shall not release the y
I applicant from compliance with federal,state,and other permit requirements. -moo
1
2. This permit maybe rescinded pursuant to S w:tlon 14(7)of the Sho line Management Act of 1971
In the event the permstee fails to comply with any condition hereof.
I;
3. A construction permit shall net be issued until thirty '0)days after approval by the City of Renton
Building and Zoning Department or until any review t ceedings initiated within this thirty(301 day
review period have be-n completed.
L
I
/Public Works Administrator Oele
THIS SECTION FOR DEPARTMENT USE ONLY IN REGARD
TO A COND"I ZONAL USE OR VARIANCE PLPMIT
I
DATE RECEIVED
APPRCVEl
DENIED:
This Conditlor.6 Use/Varlance porm9 is approved/denied uy the Department pursuant to Chapter 90 58
RCW.
Development shall be undenaken pursuam to the following additional te,ms and conditions:
Date Signature of Authorized Department Official
s ..
ar. D O.E..NR List, t�fice City of Rmmn,Trensportat o. Systems
Aeon, G....ai's Ctl City of Penton,Utility Systemt
City 0%nton.Development Senims)r von
v e
t
4 CITY OF RENTO.N
Earl Clymer, Mayor Office of the City Attorn:y
I
lawn:ace J.Wanee
May 15, 1992
TO: Mike Benoit, Utility Systems
FROM: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney
RE: Supplemental Agreement No. 2 to Task Orde.: N0.4 Cottonwood Lift Station Replacement Project, CAG 079-90,
RH2 Engineering, Inc.
g
Dear Mike:
I have reviewed the above-referenced document and the same is 'i'.'A
approved as to legal form. s
LJW:as. Lawrence J./Warren
cc: Mayor Earl Clymer
A8.83:17.
.r
i
i
Post Office Box 626.100 S 2nd Street-Renton,Washington 98057-(206)255-8678
I
�m
CITY OF RENTON
MEMORANDUM
DATE: May 11. 1992
TO: Lynn Guttmann
� FROM: Mi0.2 Benoi*�
SUBJECT: Geotechnical Investigation for Cottonwood Litt Station
Replacement
RH2 Engineering has recomm -ded that we perform a geotechnical investigation at r
the Cottunwood Lift Station site. The investigation and report can be used by the
contractors to prepare their bids and to design their shoring and dewatering plans.
Bo_ause more information will be available to prospective bidders, we should receive
lower bids.
Staff has decided on the first proposal which does N9T include design and preparation
of shoring, dewatering, and des;hmg plans and details. The estimated cost for this
Proposal is $9,060. This will be the second supplement to the original task order, but
the first for an amount under $10,000.
The raw maximum amount payable under this task order, as amended, will be
$65,029. We have :4^_9,810 budgeted for the project.
CT4W-GEO/Me8:n
y
y
.,1
t
,1
April 9, 1992
I
I
blr. Mike Benoit
City of Renton
200 Mill Avenue South
Renton, WA 98055
Subject- Cottonwood Lift Station
Geotechnical Inve�.tigation Propusal
Dear Mike:
As you requested,two proposals have been prepared for perfo.-ming a geotechnical investigat on
at the Cottonwood Lift Station site. This geotechnical investigation can be used by the
Contractors to design their own shoring,dewacering, and desilting plans,or they can be used to
develop City-designed shoring. dewatering, and desalting plans.
Thr first proposal is for performing a geotechnical investigation Sy drilling a 30'deep here and
1 examining the subsurface conditions. An analysis of the subsurface conditions will be performed
and summarized in the soils report with specific recommendations. The soils report will be
included in the Contract Documents. The estimated cost for this proposal is $9,060.
The second proposal includes all items listed in the Scope of Work for the fust proposal and the
design and drawing preparation of the shoring,dewatering and desilnng pl.ms and details. The
estimated cost for this proposal is $29,840. This cost includes the estimated cost of the State
required on-site inspection by ou. structural sub-consultant.
The fast proposal requires the Contractor to design and administer the shoring ano dewatering
system. This will result in cost savings d.ving the desi m phase,but may complicate inspection
and administration cf the construction. We have mcently hsd experiences with contractor-
designed shoring systems,wherein change orders exceeded the snoring design costs. The second
proposal will increase the design costs, but will result in uniform bidding conditions and a safe
shoring and dewatering system.
uewwea nm,
RH2 ENGINEERING,P5.
S;84158th Avenue N.E.• State 200 Opporunity Building • Redmond,INA 98052
(206)869 1488• (2%)453-0211 • FAX(206)869-7)69
Mr. Mike Benoit
April 9, 1992
Pwc 2
i
I
Please review the attached scopes of work and fee estimates for the items that are included in
each proposal to determine which alternative you prefer. We will prepare a Contract Addendum
j after you have made your selection. Please contact Dan Ervin or me if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
i
RR2 ENGINEERING,P.S.
Ii David A. Della, P.E.
i Enclosures; Two (2)Proposals,Option I and 2
i Two(2) Estimate of Hours and Cos4;
t
1
1�
t
i
i
77�
I e
wrmr
MI
i
i
i
i
COTTONWOOD LIFT STATION
GEOTECHNICAL INVESLIGATION
Option 1
*ASK 1- SOIL BORINGS-to be performed by snbconsulta-t,GeoEngineers. �
A. Explore soil and groundwater conditions by drilling on, boring
approximately 30 feet deep, with truck mounted drilling equipment. -
B. Provide recommerdenons repanli ig expected constructon difficulties such
as dewatering and w,nporary ,vsticn support.
C. Establish design values for foundation support, cplift, friction,lateral soil
pressures, and estimated post construction settlement performance.
D. Determine specifications for f .ckfill and bedding material, compaction,
and evaluating the suitability of excavated materials for use as backfill and '
bedding.
I
, E. Prepare written report summarizing th.:exploration and determinations.
i
TASK 2- REVIEW REPORT
A. Determine impacts of soils analysis.
B. Prepare recommendations of project design modifications for City to
i review.
i
I
TASK 3• SOIT SPECIFICATIONS-to be performed by RH2 Engineering.
A. Include soul boring log information in contract specifications.
F Modify centraer specifications to:nco rporate compaction requirements of -
backrill and bedding materials.
TASK 4- PROJECT DESIGN
i
No aiditional work anticipated
TASK'• SERVICES DURING BIDDING
r r...m vow�xno
L�
f
1
i
A. Coordinate with contractors bidding on project to assist with thei-
understanding of the project and the ex.sting soil am'. groundwaxr
conditions.
TASK G• CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING
A. Coordinate construction observation of shoring insWlation by labor and
Industries.
B. Coordinate inspection of soil conditions by GeoEngineers.
!.. Perform penocbc construction inspection to ensure compliance with project
specifications.
U. Renew shop drawings of shoring, dewmering, and dcsilting designs.
TASK 7• PERMITTING AND AGENCY COORDINATION
1
! No additional work anticipated.
I
i
f
i
i un,m:ocxo�cwxoY
CITY OF RENTON Exmnl C
COTTONWOOD LIFT STATION
OPTION 1-GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION
ESTIMATE OF HOURS AND COST
In/92
J3.IPPAEYSSil,1DATANSID0O'I}._I.)G 4
D.W Rnm 133.14
To_1e Path 121.90 r
INve Dtlb 3173!
Wue 16AO
Bevel f11S0
D. Dm Tony 1,r, IN,. INve Emily I Lly Bev.dy Beverly
Bnm Ervin Nr i Pair OWN D.6 W. W. HdR'. Hdit, n TOTAL
..Vun ('Art L'Vn Lip H.. Cart H... Cop Houn Co. COST
DJf8CI6'ALAAY L'0s7
y' TASK ONE BORINGS
Daum 0 0 0 w 0 0
vrrm-SMm o w o w al w — o o w 66
o w w
+ R ewpion. I o w L Sol =I w I 1�� o m'ITso�—s6
TASK TWO-RPJORTREVEW
ll)
f69 0 w 1 0I so 1 1113
r TASK TIHIEE.EDIT SPP.CHICA71ONS
Include 0 w 0 w 1 $69 0 w x Sx) S36
j 6Wdif TechS 1 f33 I 32x 1 f69 x f)3 1 S16 fHl
TASKFOUR-MMCTDESIGN
TASK PIVP.-SERVICES DURING BMLNO
(aetnpor CooAI 0 w 0 $01 1 0 0 6
TASK SIX CONSIRL'r"ION ENGINEERING
Rev;e.Shy DnL _,_ 1 $33 x 16 SxT6 0 0
Siu memctim 0 w 1 su Ix l—=cee�6.Jam re 1 o $01 01 Sol 6 136 01 Sol o 1>t
TASK SEVEN-PERMM.rNG A AGENCY COORDINATION
SUBTCrTAL(SelA ) 2 S66 11 Sul 66 $1.139 2 p3 6 769 it T
OVOWRADCOST(M.19%) T9
SURTOTAL(S.1u W Oval ) 1
MT PEE(%) $43
SUBTOTAL(Snluy.Ova ,Ne Fee: s6516
DIRECT NONSALARY COSTS
r.,d W F.Di ilx)
Reproaunlon F.. ., I 723V
In-Home Con i 125 1.
In 11..e CAD
OUTSIDE CONSULTA:YIS
Gmmr W f3
SUBTOTALLXPENSES
GRAND TOTA', Ti9A60
4
t-
o
COTTONWOOD LIFT STATION
GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION, SHORING, AND
DEWATERING SYSTEM DESIGN
Option 2
TAW f- SOIL BORINGS-to be performed by subconsultant,CrcoEry: ,Ts.
A. Explore soil and groundwater conditions by drilling, oue boring
approximately 30 feet deep, with truck mounted drilling equipr—m.
B. Provide recommendations regarding expected-onstruction difficulties such
as dewatering and temporary excavation support.
C. Establish design values for foundation support, uplift,friction,lateral soil
pressures, and estimated post construction settlement performance.
D. Determine specifications for backfill and bedding material, compaction,
and evaluating the suitability of excavated materials for use as backfill and
bedding.
E. Prepare written report summarizing the explorat;on and determinations.
TASK 2- REVIEW REPORT
A. Determine it...pacts of soils analysis.
B. Prepare recomrnendaiior,s for shoring,dewatering,and desilting designs for
City to review.
C. Prepare recc nendations of prrject design modifications for City to
review.
TASK 3- EDIT SPECIFICATIONS
A. lnclade soil boring log information in contract specifications.
B. Modify contract specifications to incorporate compaction requirements of
backfill and bedding materials.
uwm memrvrr.n,o
k
t
14)
t
t
1
Kn P-27-0510 =M OM LIFT S11TICN REPLA=U - Working File. 2+
k
3
t.
I
lTASK 4• PROJECT DESIGN•to be performed by RH2 Engineering.
A. Pripare Shoring Design
1 1. Determine type of system for supporting slopes of excavated area.
2. Develop configuration of shoring system.
3. Structural Analysis of shoring system to be performed by
subconsulusnt Ratti, Swenson and Perbix.
1
4. Prepare shoring plan anc details. Plan and derail to provide
sufficient information for the construction, maintenance and
removal of shoring system.
B. Prepare Dewatering and Desilting Design.
1. Determine type of system for removing and disposing of water
from excaveted area during construction.
2. Develop configuration of dewatering system.
3. Develop configuration of desilting system.
4. Perform hydraulic Analysis of dewatering and desilting systems.
5. Prepare dewaiering and desilting plans and details. Plans and
details to provide sufficient information for construction and
operation of dewatering and desilting systems.
Note: All plans will be prepared in an AUTOCAD format that is compatible with the Cuy's.
All plans shall be in color.
TASK 5• SERVICES DURING BIDDING
A. Provide 25 sets of shoring,dewatering and d '"ng design drawings with
bid documents.
B. Coordinate with contractors bidding on project to assist with their
understanding of the project anc the existing soil and groundwater
conditions.
t. arum meavvnno
11M1Mrr
TASK 6• CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING
A. Coordinate construction observation of shoring installation by Labor and
Industries.
B. Coordinate inspection of soil conditions by GeoEngine-,rs.
C Perform periodic construction inspection by structural engineer to insure
compliance with project specifications.
D. Review shop drawings of shoring, dewatering, and desilting design,
materials, and equipment.
TASK 7- PERMITTING AND AGENCY COORDINATION
.+. Prepare and submit temporary Hydraulic Project application to Department
of Fisheries.
B. Coordinate with Department of Fisheries permitting staff.
I. Prepare site plan with sufficient detail for processing application,
using the site plan prepared in Task 3. Assume 5 copies total.
2. Assume no public hearing required.
C. Assume no SEPA checklist squired.
3
J
♦ St �Y r t �a�� �'1' d'- ,?.s'e`�� t� �Lh Y � t ,
r
may{ .. .. .: -. .: .. , ♦ ry .� � ,... .� .. •"': � �.. .
I JAV4
CITY OF RENTON [; i`( 19��
MEMORANDUM CITY O,- REtiTON
Epktneenng DeP
To: Mike Benoit
Fro(k 7 /Donald K. Erickson, Secretary
Cl1(1� Environmental Review Committee
Date: April 8, 1992
Subject: Cottonwood Lift Station Re acement
LUA-92 043-ECF;SM
y
On behalf of the Environmental Review Committee, I would like to ir'orm you that they have
complete f their review of your project. The Committee, on April b, :992, decided that the
Cottonwood Lift Ste-ion Replacement project will be issued a Jetermination of Non-
Significance.
The Committee determined that this project is unlikely to have a probable significant adverse
Y( impact on the environment. therefore, an environmental impact statement (EIS) is not
'y required under RCW 43.21 C.0301211c1. For the record, this decision was made by the
Environmental Review Committee under the authority of Section 4-6-6, Renton Municipal
Code, after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information, on file
with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. This
i Determination of Non-Significance is issued under WAC 197-11-340. Because other
j .. agencies of jurisdiction may be involved, the lead agency will not act on this proposal foi
tT .! fifteen 115) days from April 13, 1992. Any interested party may appeal this decision in
�. writing by 5:00 p.m., April 27, 199't.
Mike, if you have any question; or desire clarification of ;he above, please call Paul
Forsander or me at 2,5.2550.
I! Thanks for your hard work)
C
i
4
St li
7
P �Ft1L
I
DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE
DESIGN TEAM REPORT
{ APRIL 8, 1992
I
A.- BACKGROUND
- APPUCANTr City of Renton Waste Water UUliry
i
PROJECT: Cottonwood Lift Station Replacement
APPUCATION NOS.- ECFSM-M-92 '
DESCRIPTION OF PROP,--AL Shoreline Substantial Development Permt for an underground j
sewage let station to replace the existing 30 year old Cottonwood
sewage let station serving the Rivera Apartments and nearby 9
Cusinesses. The existing lift station does not have secondary -
containment and as relatod uulrt•os an, underground. The
jreplacement would have secondary containment and would be
located to the southwest of the existing facility
�OCATICN OF PROPCSAL. 2003 SE Mapie Valley Hwy,adjacent to Riviera Apartments.
ISSUES. Cedar River Shoreline and 100 year/Floodplein Construction; �-
Aquafer Protection:(Secondary Containment PM elim kgf,n of
overflow to Cedar River). 1i{
RECOMMENDATIONS: Sta4,econ,meMs that the Emkonmental Review ommktee issue a II
i Determination of Non-Significance because the proposed project
1,ouid: 1)Comply with the proposed Aquifer Protection Ordinance;
I� 2) Mitigate the existing facility's lack of secondary containment:
and. 3) Provide the Increased storage capacity necessary for
erno,gency response time, thus allowing the removal of the
yoverflow connection from the stallon to the Ceda-River.
VI
CONCURRENCE ,E
DATE I i�,wi-it�Ily
NAME INMAL/D11TE �[ I\'III •�aun
I�A I✓\1A W 1=1 j
« -ra flzlsz L Mk" PROJECT
LOCATION
�0
-i
ENNRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMRTEE STAFF REPORT COTTONWOOD Ul'!STATION REPLACEMENT
R.y, `. APRR B.t9GP P"Z
i NEIGHBORHOOD DETAIL MAP
16
Con STONEWAY CONCRETE
COTTONWOOD LIFT STATION SITE
�CEJ�A R
> rD \I oJ-
rm
m 9
/PARL �q0
ATA
`' 1
p J
p JII O
` lul
x
r ..
.r'
Ad:
! ,
(
Ii II W ;h!fl!ili3j 1tryF �i� 1
�1 • c n®se eee �
� III 1
1
l�llil ; ar ;I 1=•!I r
s• Ilul�� � 1^ I I
iY I(IIIiI( �,,,�....���j�111��P�`:%��,.�, ,• ee ea a'.N
d n �yt� � j 1 t i _ ���• ;
II
N .
I �y ti Y
t
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/CIVISION:
APPROVED _APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS _NOT APPROVED
I
I
DATE:
S7GNA� IRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
1
t NA{ COMMENTS: e
f `
IV
i B
I a
I
r
I
I
i
i
a
I
i
1
I
We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have
expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is
needed to properly assess this proposal.
i
Signature of Dire, or or Autorized Representative Date
i
i
i
.. au.
i
ICl t
a
MMENTS:
1
i
We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have
expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is
needed to properly assess this proposal.
6 113yr�leµ d'
m Signature of Directto r A�=ed Representative Date
f '
� A
t,
r�y
OMMENTS Uie�G/�nr?4' l7ii'� 3 $ ti
1 — /er J2 77. J
�<1/UMW// Ti�1iG A//'�<fwl ��� /IS G�/rc..li o✓l
9 l `ram e•�/l�y/� �ti� �
�CXr1L,�sg ��p�4olf<r>
I
We have reviewed this application with particu!ar attennon [a those areas in which we have
expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas wnere additional information is
needed to properly assess this proposal.
Q , � �-Z
'
Dare
=
Signature of Director or ized Pepresentauve
i
J1j
I
..w'
t
1
Date: March 11, 1992
To: Mary Lynne Myer
i
From: Ron Pike 1
i
Subject: Long Runge Planning Section comments on lift station replacement off Maple
Ii Valley Highway i
The site is designated Commemial by die revised April 1985 Comprehensive Plan.
The March 1992 Revised Land use Concept designates the site "Office/Rmidential
Center."
Checklist responses to 4 b. and 4 c. appear contradictory. 4 b. states there is no
vegetation on the site("is currenuy paved") and 4 c. states that all existing vegetation
will be retained.
The plans also show the construction of a 20 foot by 40 foot gravel parking area. It is
not clear why the adjacent Riveria Apartment parlong lot cannot be used.
Please note that section 7.18.01 of the City's Shoreline Master Program(Utilities-
Landscaping) states "A. 1. Native vegetation shall be maintained whenever possible",
C. 2. "An unhoused installation on the ground...sha1 be sight screened with evergreen
trees, shrtbs, and landscaping panted in sufficient depth to form an effective and -
actuai sight barrier within 5 years."
The project summary states the lift station will be enr;rely underground,but is not clear
from the plans if the top of the station and adjacent a vault are at ground level or
below (L.us allowing planting above).
/ --// PRUPERIY M11f44LMaf11 fLc MGl'ILK
r l� DEVELOPMENT AM IGTION REVIEW SHEET O PUN RENEW ROUTING SLIP
U ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SWEET O
f / OTHER
APPLICANT-APPLINT: �{.
JOB ADDRESS: a�pa, J ZETA. WON �f/IY
MATURE OF WORK' GREEK o
DATE RECEIVED BY PROPERTY MGMT. RECEIVED FROM COMMENTS DUE
i / �{
FEES AP-LIED C3 NEED MORE INFORMATION O LEGAL DESCRIPTION
O NOT APPROVED FOR O FRONT FOOTAGE O SQUARE FOOTAGE
APPLIGTION OF FEES Q VICINITY MAP O OTHER r1AFIWNG mmION
CRY OF REMTON
SUBJECT PROPERTY PIDa__ 0.�- 94$% MAR 2 51992
PS=i,LIVED
It la the Intent of this development fee weal9sb to P. the devebper/awasr an ootj,a.Wet the fees quoted below will apply to
the subject eke upon development of We property. All quoted fees are due and payable at the time We construction permit Is
Wood t. Install the an sae and oftske Imprsoumooh(I...endergreood utilities,street ImProvenngts,sfs.) The fallawlag
quoted fees do NOT Include Inspectlw foes,aide aeon,persona,r/w permit fees or the cost of water meters.
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT PARCEL METHOD OF ! ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT OR
DISTRICTS NO. NO. ASSESSMENT ! __.UNM FEE
LCA/W
_LG/5
LCA/OTHER —
SAD/W
SAD/S — —
JUA —D—
LID
TB7.
FUTURE OBLIGATIONS —
SPECIAL UTILITY CONNECTION CHARGE•WATER UNITS SUCC FEE
Single family residential dwelling unit$g60/Mt x
A artmtnt Cords,each multiplex waft$565/4a soft z _
Commercial/Irdusirlal$.136/q.fL of property i
(not Is.Wan$940.00) L(.�
SPECIAL UTILITY CONNECTION CHARGE•SEWER
Single family residential dwelling unit$670/let a
Apartment Conde,each multiple:waft$270/ei soft i
Commercial/ladustrial 5.063/q.flat i .{
(gee leas the.$470.00) �� 0 L� / � �Ld do
x 7
TOTAL $ —
'If subject property Is within an LID.R Is developers respeamOA ty to check with We Finance Dept for paid/st"ald status. M N
a
r,
Signature of Director at Authorized Representative DATE a
�l
1
COMMENTS:,r
2
c T/r.. �sdir
�wt
err X/ /O
� wr ✓i cc
�. . App�ic... t oYs�olcJ Q 3/v
� !v;/� �^d iw w, -j�' h.k l�lb �^ /,�f S•fa/i:. ✓</re ✓e• /t.
s. ,asp 11 Lan I /J Yc�INCJ ,S[lc..�AJ Cvs•1b in A.e..'f T r'
y.y/f ConJiJ/Y f a i// /Lt !ry✓,�/i /lrrktfi ore, S-/W cn,``lr
Cus.J frMc�9�n vT
I
i
We have reviewed this a,,plicabon with particular attention to those areas in which we have
expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is
needed to properly assess This proposal. +
Sionatura of Director or A rized Representative Date
.nrnw A
t
-. ..•"�. y. '.'.., r as
x
M � t
�� sa
REVIEWiNG DEPARTMENT/DIVISION:
i
APPROVEG APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS _NOT APPROVED
1 . n
`J re v:e,Z7 teco..l c%�•�yy C-ar•�ir.;. /r•LL<,.'� r ��t �/-.%•(�+ �ereL
M4 e"//7'(O^ G /�//', ..C44, , TO
2 . 1� s461 Y O<J�(I % K m� ws..� to ce lCr.n• c.
-• yGt n1�„fir; v./u� 4 a d,i�,..;t,o... ..f / c%e ., lev-',
cc"fy it • v+:�o (/p �%c Ciwl` >�n /�<.
Ct d.r River G M // r-el ."G a�/!r.v.! ;y
�, (/G(.;J ��G C•<l•'In /I rI CC/J VO4 M.�� WMT T.>' GV./I!!�'L
PeJs..lri� /in�ar� f4*+ 6ew.-�( .�Ir cl. (V` ya�4
Oi/ op✓Cch�' �re�e(er. , J'�/4C-4/nJ, anC✓ ufer-.
DATE:
SIGNATURE OF DIREC
T99 OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
i
R
1i
Y ..J
4 P
h
s n .
f t -
1
� r
. a
COMMENTS:
syc ) e
9,wr,
1 TGG J,Fc ,1 APq 1 2 7 F fi
anf r , cf .('e e.+.<rnr ('nn Lw.;. „•i ,f+.s �... /r�t
" sly i�a, a.+ c/ Vr l✓r
C7 11
P // <..... pr of-rd dr.r,:.� CMI�i'wr•f'^"i
rr4..O rr f<r Jc !J
Y" T�G CY f L rJ �i Jln Fia. will
¢'Dayn.<.,1 w•�d �'T� X/A wr%l6e M+re.e ! .. A itv,Y/ Le.
Cr d.r (�ivrr
<_
G.NGc�c b«;.,
i
r
i
i
We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have
expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional intormahon is
needed to properly assess this
oposal.
-D1- . , r Cot is/ -'1 .7 -23- 9z
Signature of Director or Autoriz epresentanve Date
Y 9
i
is
.SL1G�G'R
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: SnC:__y
✓ W f.PPROVED _APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED
Ci
1. T" 47� dfJ,It 1 der) 14, rl� can�,;,/Msnt ry�<., y.w
M./, ws� f �o ry ro is IL (I
2. Y. wA, / TO 1Ae/-4 p///D M_' ,'Cr o6firv.J
LlC A 6dyl
Jno.L-t+� rt/a.ir if enfa•5� �C.El arc a�ijccve,ed�
Q•c/ Cl.c u.w.ti,fi dio+ v� //ic ¢,rr�)/'i� Con diY/w,s. O/d/
3. /7ew t. f �oc� l d, ��,1 s. /v.
r ewlt>. .nf. Iti t ✓�.4 t /pl./nr / /e 1ij sle �,i/d.>i_
�. �•, .tKG✓eq ,.,..,t p/one y�« ,r/i... /� JNew tl,� /�� , fi:..
/'Ar J,(w{r. .nd ,�,y„ O•r,
4
1
DATE: J -A7y- /.2
SIGNATURE OF CIRECTO R AUTHORIZED RFPRESENTATIVE
Lx.
* ;s
1
i
T ' —
%.r � REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: "
«�
NOT APPROVEC
^Ykr•- APPROVED __ApppOVED WITH CONDITIONS
,
1
3. StmC�'
4'Xj Spa �la�s
DATE: f
i
SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
... Iry
I
�I
/COMMENTS: _ p
r�Vr
i
Y
r
we have reviewed this application with partcular attention to those areas in which we have
expertise and have identified areas of probable Impact or areas where additional information is
needed to properly assess this proposal.
S nature of Dir for or. ed Representatr.e Date
l_
o 3b
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: Q/y yt/W77L
APPROVED APPROVED WITH`CONDITIONS -.W_NOT APPROVED
A� ero S..r._�J�•J"n... Co. 'J�SJ �p �.i, sl�p,i,
zss�
"fir. r
IGNATUREDATE:
ORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
e...xnx .•,E
fre
YTS `Ani..
ye
� :.
MOM-
Y j .
'a. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION:
I
PROVED _APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS _NOT APPROVED
-tit, �L
a
M
i
f� n
42,
h _
ry
A
DATE:
SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
e
g i
6Z
i AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION
yy ' hi Srley Morehead
ik} .being first duly Sworn On ORCh Acct. t30039
states that hetshe is the Chief Clerk of the
VALLEY DAILY NEWS
600 S.Washington Kent,WA.98032
Daily newspapers published six(6)times a week. That said newspaper
is a legal newspaper and is now and has been for more than six oty DEVEtoEY itihsh avisxxa
��. months prior to the date of publication referred to, printed and Nonce Or aEK"TION
puhlished in the English language continually as a daily newspaper in FOR SHOWUNE Ma EYEW
SLISSKent, Kin County, Washington. The Valley Daily News has been NN,wT i.'''�1 pEVEiORNK. PERYu
approved as a legal newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the P1i1�nW
State of Washington for King Coup anRlapinM n
tV. has a"'e°y'a0"I^"rAdww
gA W tl!ppraYtrlisn a
CrAbi,nt of n npetpva'm aewape`n
The notice in the exact form attached, was published in the Valley "'°an a"p'aa w ra1111t1hii oxa
Dail News (and not in supplement form)which was regularly distrib- n`Q „`�wha ft RwaY ayan
Y 9 mNts ssM..My"ihassws a tw ar
;; utetl to the subscribers during the below stated period. The annExed nr nun aos d ine wpt vow
_ noticea Public notice f VN7155-RRP. Fnginnnring P c ("Its"I aitiiiipipsw�
•1 CITY OF RENTON, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION, NOTICE pr ClawRiseri er w�miih Snion
t OF APPLICATION FOR SHORELINE MGMT SUE. DEVEL. PERMIT. 1td TwarMV 23N'Pn*5.WY.Mms
Dal'd Rlift IGi[C hty Wash1,1a1.
Si orm p in t Y pmp tc,ha with
Was published on March 6 and 1 3. 1992 tr Dint,raw ssWa it,usa:a'ea w<o
The full amount of the fee , urged for said foregoing publication is
the sum of$ lo;_n0 W kiitsW'„c°0 yb;n,aa�ei't,h the
`m- -J� +pgkaian siw.,m ndily ine De etti 8 nt
Semces isA . S,ai t.,Wish Suso-
hi,3pp Ya avenue S,Ramon.Wunutplm
. � - tep55 N wr!vq d na Yreal wi'nin mery
' Subscribed and sworn before e t s 1 th day Of r,h 19.y.2— �xi an Of m.Yai pue�caeons of this
>» na'o.
Gry m Renton
Oe'wbpn'enl S010, Dnnsnn
r� PvhhsneC in this VaMY DOJY N<ws an
ary Public for the State of Washington M'6,na 13,taps 7155
residing at Kent
King County, Washington
i vpwm w.ss vm
f
'
R
• :1
e
�Wlrtwv+er.•�n.w..u:.w,.w.•e»�sawltivs: v •.
w.
CITY OF FIENTON
MEMORANDUM
f
DATE: March 11, 1992 --
Tom'. Mike Benoit
l
FROM: Paul ForsanQe
SUBJECT- Cottonwood Lift Station Replacement
ECF;SM-043-92
The Development Planning Section of the City of Renton has formally accepted the above-
( referenced application for preliminary review.
It is tentatively Scheduled for consideration by the Environment Review Committee on April 1,
1992, Following that review, you will be notified of the ERC's decision regarding this project.
Please contact me, at ezt. 3167, d you have any questions.
1
I
s
1 wgB ;.y✓
r .
DIY yx
IT a>
Y�
.r.Nr
_ __. Go•+ra-+:v of Gnr rOJ J000 '
:• . .. __ -_.___ _ a,+<r iTa T+�J it
nO'
Y
T✓< Q4114-+ S✓eJ_9 f/aJt / -1tl�!- Sty+9 i<`•J+JN
E wq ;
Twe •„>afc a• 5EPJ+cc ReP .J asw goJJ aJGGOJ AJ R 'f
4iA37c JareT Leo Tccr ds �,/y(.e_ ;T- $'ip `
ARO GapY rroRQiJOJ ( Z7 S' 2$b SJ TO Ct1JGT Sw GG r. ".(.
p' .S•t o.J 5/Of SE JG•Q •f-tlP QC+OJ rah! Va<lC a/ Y.J>
C,SfE 4Trac✓< o' o� /o<o ^o.rca S+TG p<a..a J.>•s
MGl✓o0 Of RGcoJJ[c r.�J
- ` �Ra/J •JTo VGrJG��
�BJ ICCU a>S SVO J�O ...10T QQ ITT�C4G0 T'O JI��
9� U...Y JL JJG ��/Gw I_'�f.>3•l> F• < � AS PoJJOaT+vJ
. (J ?wG .-.aJye<E CCoQ «`,OG P4�a J.a jIJ•c, ? GaJ
- 3C a�oJ E12 e.JC'i"i A�9 +J ••--+/Ep J+lJJ 41 eo r.Pa 4G0
' ' V TI K< /r GJ^ +Cu1 8'Or< +PC�Sc.JI +T /J UJ JS aQ�G
JOf T•+f Pf P•+N aJr .a oeGA S•+so J�o JeT r0_.. Ca.aJ
-we /L<Tcv4^+ . nut LP£J.Y OCJ 'T <.KC. Tw/.�GX Te
I
' � 'u�JG u.• +oeJJ rw.rtC
A
a
1
,coo
x
i
f
J
J
6MPA-704-V . J g
i
/yJ4o�� VI- cc o-
8'Dr�P
7'nEsr h'
G Ilk
` •• BB�D \� G '•wYE
t .
r..
y
y'
•v 'xt�i`t�
CITY OF RENTON
MEMORANDUM
DATE: March 3, 1992
TO: Development & Planning Section
FROM: Mike Benoit, Wastewater Utility Sect.on''ta
SUBJECT: Cottonwood Lift Station Replacement
1
Please charge the necessary application fees for the above-referenced project to
Account No. 421r400 M596.35.65.45005 (45005)(5170). We would appreciate if
you would send a copy of the transfer to Linda Ferkingstad for he, records.
If you have any questions, plea:a tali me at Ext. 6206.
CTN F[E M 0
I
f
1
1
ATROY
UTILITIES COMMITTEE
COMMITTEE REPORT
' February 24, 1992
RELEASE OF SEWER SERVICE EASEMENT, RIVIERA APARTMENTS
Referred January 27, 1992
i —JI
The Utilities Committee recommends concurrence with the recommendatiions of staff and y
� the Board of Public Works as fol:ows:
d
I Completely release easement recorded under AF #6311736. `r
f
2) Partially release easement recorded under AF #5094983.
I 3) Do not release easement recorded under AF #5122433, as there are currently
i
facilities located within that easement.
j 4) The release of easement and new easement be recorded concurrently Ito facilitate
uninterrupted service to the site).
1
i
5; Designate this Release of Easement as Class "B", more specifically described as:
CLASS B: All City of Renton easements for which no I public funds have been
i expended in the acquisition, improvement or maintenance of same or easements
originally dedicated or otherwise conveyed to the City by the present petitioner for
the release of said easement for which no public expenditures have been made in the
acquisition, improvement or maintenance thereof.
Jesse Tanner, Chair
I
Bob Edwards, Vice Chair Y
CTimothy J. ,h�1 I zer, Member
i �c�wr�van,.er /
e...r rr.
L
i
, i
ti
l
CITY OF RENTON
l
MEMORANDUM
i
DATE: lama:y 20, 1992
TO: Marilyn Pedersen
t
FROM: 01 p Dick Anderson
i
SUBJECT: Ramac Street Vacation
i
I I recognize this street vacation petition has been in process for a long time without apparent
progress. The petitioner did have an appraisal prepared, which we took excaption to and "
appraised value was not accepted by the City. At that time we were beginning the design .or
replacement of the Cottonwood Life Station to replace the out-dated lift station on Mr. Shane's
property. The replacement will involve new property rights and the release of a portion of the
existing easements on Mr. Shane's property.
I would like to request that the street vacation matter he continued until the lift station easements
are resolvea. It would be appropriate 'o refer fte street vacation to staff for further staff work
when the lift station easements are completed.
f c<. x.y Shady
�� 0.vs TihhM
i'
I
I
I
,J
{
��� jl J'`! � 't•
,} CITY OF RENTON _ r
.a Planning/Building/Public Works Department
Earl ClYmcr. MaYar_._ t`�—GatWrr•.ALlddatnlar
s°e
December 9. 1991
Daniel R. Ervin, P.E.
RH2 Engineering
8383 - 158th Avenue N.E.
Suite 200, Opportunity Building
Redmond WA 98052
SUBJECT: CAG 079�90 ADDENDUM#1-91
COTTONWOOD LIFT STATION REPLACEMENT
Enclosed for your records is an executed original of Supplemental Agreement ND. 1 to Task
a ] Order No. 4 of Annual Consultant Contract for Pr fessional Engineering Services, CAG 079
e
Very truly yours,
Michael A. Benoit
Wastewater Utility Engineer
SAL CTNW!MAB:Ir
3 '•- AnaeNMm
x
d
�Y
fTt'i
200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 `
t r r"1
Ja�•
,ems•,
J
i3 '
• :il):34S3N�S - _ -_ _��aCrra-r-r-raGts>=tr ,S
PERPETUAL EASEMENT
KNOW ALL YEN BY THESE PRUSIUvra
v' That. .Anna C. Burdulia_. :..3m and -Charlad1,comh...tur arid-Agnes--E.��Shane,
v7 husband and wife.hereinafter refereed In u`pasty of the brat part"for and In mnaldentlon of ON9 DOLLAR and
other good bid valuable cormlderatlon,receipt of which In,hereby acknowledged,do hereby grant,release and convey
unto the MY Or RENTON,a Municipal Corporation of the Stale of Washington, sa •Party of the ascend put.-
in'casement apput.enanl and perpetual over,M.and to the following described propenice:
A 101 easement, the center lxne of which is described as folluwsi
Deginning at the intersection of 'he whet line of Gov't Lot 8 Sac. 17 T23N R5E W.M.
with the centerline of Primary State Highway N5; thence aoutheaaterly along said
A center line a distance of 298,
thence S 45°29, W a distance measured 30' at right angles to said center lime to the
soutnwesterly niu•gin of Primary State Highway N5 and the true point of beginning;
thence continuing S 65'291 W a distance of 1101; thence southeasterly along a line
parallel and 1101 distant frost the southwesterly margin of Primary State Highway
N5 to a point on said line, westerly 117,94, from the east line of Gov't Lot 83
Section 17, T 231;orth R5E W.M. as measured parallel to the southwesterly margin
of Primary State Highway N5, said point being the end of said easement.
Alaot
M
Q
A 201 easement and a 101 easement the center lines of which are described as followsl
Q Beginning at the intersection of the west line of Gov't Lot 8 Section 17 T2314 R5E
W.1.1 with the center line of Primary State Highway y5; thence southeasterly along said
center line a distance of 298, more or less to a Y.T. of curve of said Highway; thence
S W291 W. a distance of 1301 to the true point of beginning of the 201easement;
thence continuing S L50291 W a distance of 20, to the end of the 20'easement and the
beginning of the 101 easement; thence continuing S 45'291 W to the northerly bank
of the Cede. River and the end of the 101 easement.
Attached and inade a part hereof is City of Renton Engineering Department Drawing
No. B2.1-57.
And the party of the second part W have for the purposes of conav,ictlon, repair,gervwe,ani maintenance of
sawase pipe line,;aodmhy,uoneg patilla awl:weraEalesamp
I
7t
IN WITNESS WHEREOF the aid sarllea have hereunto sat their h'Rida and ssaL Nla_...._.._�X� __4ay of
19.4
r
October, ,xm. .ate
I
' n. ...._.U.._ ....
STATE OF WASHINGTON `"`tN+.'� - � ��'-•� - "' --
tAYMTT or K,., Y.
I,the underetgned Nulary Public In and for the state of Washington, melding In Renton, Y•9YSington, do
hereby certify that on the _. '1CIy` _ .. day..--OC tabor_... .... _ _. 11Y977 YYceraonauy
appeared before on, Anna C. durdulis , anaCkarlas..P. Shane
h*mW*,to me known W be the Individuals described in and who executed the same a their free and volunlar
y act
and deed for the uaes and purpores herein mentioned. 1959
Divot under nay hand and oMm&4 seal thla ___.__ .. ((. .._gar
Y; Notary Public In and for the State of Waahingto
reading In Renton.
. s's
Y .. '�+ .;:�'�30• ;qi txA � Kok
Y
'Ia{l•— W, U U 1 J L.UU
Oatr Serial No. ' ReceMng lonAr U*11r 5054 ' 10J t
�j r
-, n _ e a Aga La t/t'ale LAa7G1yAL1Y 1
KNOW ALL MEN BY THMU PRZSXN,9: l
Tlat CI^,rlos 11. Shade h and. _ALnes Su._ Ildlle.
. _.. .......
In .. .._...__........._,ustwnd mid wife,hereinafterreferredtou",-party or the fart for and In consideration of ONE r*LLAR and
other Toud and valuable corWldmtlup.receipt of which le hereby wknowledgsd,du hereby grant,release and convey
.D unto the CITY Or RENTON,a Municipal Corporation of the state of Waahington u Party or the Wood
u,easement a part,"
f � pDurtenant antl perpetual over,on,and to Ufe rolloaing described propertlm;
e
_ A 10 foot easenwnt, the centarline of which is described as follows:
i7
Degiruting at the intersection of the west line of C t
Section 17, Township 23 Dorth Range c ov t Lot B,
ay 5 ast, 4isv with the
D centerlino of Primary State highway ,7169, (Maple Valle Richwa�y
thence eouthoasterly along said centerline a distance of 36d.1t4�feet•thence south 50°20121't west 30.19 to the true point of beginning of '1 said 10 foot easement; thence continuing south 50°2012I" west to the
Ibank of the Cedar River.
Together with a_i additional 10 foot easement, 5 feet on either side of
the previously described 10 foot easeldant; bteing 20 feet in length.and
lying t:esterlY of a line drawn perpendicularly from a point on the
centerline of said previously described easement south 5002012111 west
132.31 feet from the centerline of Nagle Va11ey Highway.
And we tarty of the second part to have for the purpose of construction,repair,service,and maintenance of
M-Mt pipe Imes and any other public unpile,and serrlces.
IN WITNESS WNER"the raid Pardee have hereunto Set their hands and seals thm..... 2;�...._Ifir .._...._day of
STATE Or WASHINOTON
Coon" or Itrwo u'
"4
I, the undersigned Notary Public In and fps the State It Wuhingtwi, realding 'n Renton, Wawringtun, do
here y,�th.t ow the
a ......_.. ........... .day....... -<15.L.CL.aLh ... personally'
. .t.d In Add
-•act_
}P�igfRd�lir�e{ad as kno�.ap` the IndlYtdeln described m and who executed the faata u their free and voluntary act
QeAl�llep t3t�purpoMe aertlu mentioned.
yQlslw apdsr syl l ' a:t0 official seal this....._........ ,F.....
l
1
llotaq hWle N and for the State of Washington,
rutmng In Renton.
rdsew Setae -/iv�� A7�1A•
RaPreY of
RCORT A.MMOIS AW11- _
,fir. + lYeh R. t 4M,
'.✓t.
y ,�"•,J y �t'1 J t �T 1'
1 l+ {,.i� 1 ..r. e 5 }�1' t lt•t b 4
M
PERPETUAL EASEMENT
KNOW ALL MEN By THESE PRESENTS.
i �
' tn That Charles k,.Shana
.,it . Agnew an Sham. _
husband mtl wife,hereinafter•eferred to as"party of the first -�I """and"
other good and valuable consideration,receipt of which Is herebyaacknowledged,onhereby grant,release and convey
unto the CITY OF RENTON,a Municipal Corporation of the Mete of Washington, as 'Party of the second part;'an easement Appurtenant and perpetual over,on,and to the following described p•operlle,: situ,tied in
King County, State of Washington to-wit,
(I An easement ten (10) feet in width being five (5) feat on each side
of the foliowing described centr'rline.
Beginning at the intersection of the east line of Government Lot 8
and the South right-of- way line of PSH No. 5, t:.ence N 560 43' 47- W,
471.67 feet to the true point of beginning. Thence S 140 42- 13- W,
476.4 feet, thence N 750 170 47' W, 25.0 feet, all being located within
Sec. 17, T23N, R5E, W. N.
i
And the party of the second part to have for the purposes of construction,re replacement
sewage pipe lines and any other public utilities ann services. pair.Rnt<a/and mUntenance of Water a
IN WITNESS WHEREOF the sand parties have hereunto act their hands and seals N4...._1,..............
..�4.k.h {....__�.�:.. . . .o- c .......
/ GRANTOR
STATE OF WASHINGTON )
Couwry ur Kmo I as.
1, the undersigned Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing in Renton, Wathlnpop, do
hereby certify that on the...._..._....._.17tb.......__..__...day._.......__._Fab2'Wyl'1L__. ..Am M. permaf"y
appeared before me _. _.Charlon_F..Sllatie _ ....._-_.and y. .
ia
his wile,to me known to be the individuals described In and who executed thea as their it newt and eohm%W set
and deed for the usep titd.purposes herein mentioned.
[TT.14
Otva under m6}46 and•o` U wan t114......._17 ......_.......... of.............FAbruzzli$.....................ISM.iM
if
y + y( c oyry Public In and fo Staa of W WlnRto
`. . y ev; '%j ,t �i7 residing In Renton.
.
j �aCgr1, fNT O c
trt OrF�QY L nlotl for g««e .i•'r-+f fy G. i 4' rA�
Reeved d
ROUR A MORRIS.C«aay Alden.
S�
�i.- • 5 l
s
s4
t
a:
CITY OF RENTON
MEMORANDUM
t
DATE: November la, 1991 —
TO: David Tibbot, Technical Services Supervisor
FROM. Mike Benoit, Project Manager V"
SUBJECT: Cottonwood Lift Station Rep'acemeit
1
t
We would like to request preparation by your staff of the Easement and Release of
Easement documents for the above mentioned project. Enclosed for your use is a map
showing existing and proposed easements. We would like to release :he entire
existing easement and acquire a new permanent easement and temporary construction
easement as shown.
Your staff can charge their time to Work Order 45007. If you have any questions,
please see me.
CTNWESMTNAeal
°xloaura I
cc Rendu,Puame
J
4 7
i_ 1 C.UI .RS
r1aNNtxi
Sc11NTI�n11s
1277.20(.431)
July 11,1991 �
vvUU
Mr.Tim Wicks \\l PENjG 4
Washington State Department of Transportation Ct�10 el\O$OeP
15325 SE 30th Place
Bellevue,Washington 98007.6538 6
t Subject: Cottonwood Lift Station
Permit Requirements
g Dear Mr.Wicks:
1 This letter confirms our telephone conversation of July 10,1991 concerning permit requirements
for the Cottonwood Lift Station.
2 As we discussed,the Cottonwood Sewer Lift Station will be completely replaced with a new
t facility. This replacement will require a new gravity sewer connection to the 42-inch diameter
METRO sewer at a manhole in the Maple Valley Highway.
i
I called to investigate the State's permitting requirements to work within tb9 Maple Valley
Highway. You stated that we would not need to obtain permits for performing this work As
you explained,the City of Renton is providing a rightof-way to the State for this highway. Any
public works performed within this right-of-way by the City would not require a Sate permit.
The only State requirement is that the highway be restored per State specifications.
Please a .tact me immediately if this letter does not accurately reflect our conversation.
i
Sincerely,
RH2 ENGINEERING,Y.S.
AAJ411,
David A.Della
cc: Mike Benoit,City of Renton
J RH2 ENGINEERING,P.S.
9393 158th Avenue N.E.. Sidle 200 Opportunity Building • Redmond.KA 98052
(206)869-1488. (206)453�0241 . FAX(206)869.7769
�. J
ENGINEERS
PLANNERS
SCIEN11S1S
1277.2X422)
i
July 2, 1991
Mr.Mike Benoit 1
City of Renton
200 Mill Avenue South
Renton,Washington 98055
Subject: Cottonwood Lift Station
Easement Requirements
Dear 912:^:
Layouts for the permanent facility casement and temporary construction easement for the
Cottomvuod Lift Station are included on the enclosed site plan. These drawings are for your
review and use in preparation of the legal descriptions and owner negotiations. ^
The acceptance of this easement is a prerequisite for submitting the design for a Shoreline
Substantial Development Permit.. Please inform us when the easement has been approved so
that we can submit the design for permitting.
Thank you for your consideration,please call if you require additional information.
Sincerely,
' RH2 ENGINEERING,Y.S.
1 David A.Della
Enclusum: Site Plan
i
;6
i
RH2 ENGINEERING,P.S.
838.1 158th Avenue N.E.• Suite 2W Opportwury Building • Redmond.WA 98052
2061 864-1 488• 1206l 451.0241 • F4R(206)969 t764
Y It
f Vw-1 ca Ha-c G CP
/PY.4rc �Y�JG e1WC P/Z09"l.Zj
SKY' • � PQ 6.+b.Jr t91 K46'J _ PQt^NCN 6•G Ind
L/P YWOJC 6Qv.+�%'�
O�� SMIT4� LOJ. STdJOdt9 /' aQ,7
::= srwos c.JC4 � �2eaVcr -�R►•Cot99r� Q�•�ooe
..«« IJAcJ2 Jr` f2/i-, UfTORe�- p�PC .ws.oe (SNe-+?/
�y IJ MN M
Oar O STi
;_^^/ InICJu c„�4'rGq ICGCss AO."
V
NCJ
3 os o04 •7 r,—+r.0
B r.c.�ae.•: `pap KY♦ Leash ( p/OJbv Yo nv,
Goon ~f Ci
^ Pa.r/'r+e
I CC P¢c.Y.J P�Ma 4-O e.-c••r t(�oe C4e4
.WFAceQ,♦ad oe,
�r ar
e
A.uG T11'e. fb4 cc. n�1�` �, pF,
„try, r
'All
" 4 ;
;r.
.t.
ro
1S\Ii2\
1i'IFS IIS'.�
7
9
1277.20(.372) :.
May 22, 1991
Mr.Mike(Benoit
City of Renton
200 Mill Avenue South
Renton,W.ashiagton 93055
1
Subject: Cottonwood Lift Station
Door Mike:
This letter is a request to schedule a review meeting for the Cotton
design criteria,secondary Containment, wood Lift Station to review
and the mechanical plan. We would like to do this as
soon as possible so we can continue with work on the project. We would like to hold this
meeting at your office on Wednesday,June 5, 1991, if this fits into your schedule
Please call to cmifirm the date and time Thank you for your consideration. -1
Sincerely,
FI2-kNG
- Daniel R. Erin,P.E.
-- -. R112 ENGINEERING,PS
8383 IS8th Avenue N.E.• Suite 200 Opportunity euilditgt • Redmond.WA 98052
1206)$69-1488 9 1-20614S3-0271 • FAX 12061869-7769
1� J
_J
CITY OF RENTON
MEMORANDUM
DATE: April 26, 1991
TO: ')Ave:'ibbol
FROM: D ck Anderson
SUBJECT: RAMAC Street Vacation No.001-89 Slalus
These has oeen no contact with Dan Shane that I'm aware of since Sept tuber 1990. We were
proposing a possible trade of property if we have to relocate the Cottonwood Litt Station. RH2
Engineering has been preparing a preliminary design to determine if an easement may be required.
They should have a preliminary design and right of way plan to us by Frid•.y, May 3rd. We will
review those plans and make a recommendation on acquiring the property. Should have more info
to you by May 10th.
: Mite lemM1
f
I f
.J
,.a �_ �.
�.r�M �'� �-i. M'- + ♦� +��
! � .. �'�:
i
�r�
s ( _ � ` y
� � _ �`�
.. • s:.
S . .
S. �Ti _
0
i
_.. r.. ,'
` -
,,.
. ' , •
,,
t.
F 1
YL•
Q
Je t�
CITY OF RENTON
MEMORANDUM
DATE: April 24, 1991
TO: Dick 0.1derson
FROM: Dave Tibbot � P....E
SUBJECT: RAMAC Street Vacation No.001.89
Bronson Way North
Dick, the RAMAClDan Shane Street Vacation is still listed as "pending" on the agenda
of the Ways and Means Committee.
Arlene informs_ me that in September, 1990, Dan Shar 3 called the Mayor s Office and
voiced an objectior to our rejection of his appraisal. You asked her to prepare a
chronology of events surround'.ng our denial of Shane's appraisal, a copy of which is
attached.
Subsequently, you talked with Jay Covington. Notations indicate: 'Dan
Shane was given an ester_ ;,. :Fment maps to be prepared by RH2 and City may
have to pay for appraisal.'
Please provide us with a written update as to the status of this Street Vacation so we
may add the status report to the file.
If ,ve can be of any help or support in an effort to bring this street vacation to a
conclusion, please call on us.
aAMAGSwAMHA
AtucMnent
i
\Nl, MEANS COMMITTEE
AGENDA
April 22, 199''
ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS
Ordinance for second an fin I r a in
None
Ordinan •s for first readine:
None
Reso'utions for r it�and adootlan:
�b
Segregating ;assessments re Lid *314; Parcel 12 �.
Authorizing Application for Funding Assistance for Outdcor Recreation Project - Black River
Riparian Forest
Authorizing Application for Funding Assistance for Outdoor Recreation Project - Lake
Washington Vistas
Authorizing Commitment of Funds to Match those Funds from the Conservation Futures Levy -
Fund - Lake Washington Vistas Project
1
Endorsing Resolution o. the Suburban Cities Association of King County Regarding Growth
Management Legislation
i
Authorizing Mayor and City Clerk t0 Sign an Interlocal Agreement for Regional Planning of the
Central Puget Sound Area
I
i
APPROVAL OF CONTRACTS
None '
APPROVAL OF VOUCHERS
Approval of claims checks 078475 through 78896 and one wire transfer, totaling $666,707.69 and
-jayroll vouchers •97065 through 97437, and 258 direct deposits, in the amount of$825,037.99.
I
I
r�
a°
i
i
' I
I
Ways and Means Committee
Agenda
Page Two
PENDING IN COMMITTEE
RaMac Street Vacation Ordinance (VAC-98-001) Bronson Way North (Referred 4/17/89)
Administrative Appeal Language in City Code (Referred 2/5/90) City Attorney requested to
research all of the processes for decisions, recommendations, and appeals; and draft a "Citizens
Apprai Handbook" for committee (9/17/90) City Attorney advised It will be quite some time
before ready (1/4/91)
Shurgard Annexation Legislation (Referred 3/19/90)
Sunset Park Phase II, F;ggins, R-100-99 (Referred 6/25/90)
Cheung Rezone, Union Plaza, 3908 NE 4th Street, R-021-89) (Referred 8/20/90) . .
Council Committee Policies (Referred 2/4/91)
Three-Year Banking Service Contract (Referred 3/4/91) Council authorized bid call on 3/11/91
Malesis Rezone, Smithers Avenue South(R-050-90) (Referred 4/8/91)
Cross Connection Control Program and Ordinance (Referred 4/8/91)
Water Conservation Plan Ordinance (Referred 4,8/91)
1
IJIi ITEMS FOR NEXT BUDGEF ADJUSTNfENT QRDINANCE
I
I
CM OF RENTON
MEMORANDUM
DATE: September 19, 1990
TO: Dick Anderso•t,Utility Systems Division Manager
FROM: Arlene Haight,Property Dlanagementct�lik
SUBJECT: R'MAC Street Vacation No.001-89
Bronson Way North e
r
Chre :olotry of contact with Dan Shane(RA:MAC)and his appraiser.
62690
Dick Anderson,Dave Tibbot, and Arlene Haight met with Dan Shane's appraiser,Chuck
Mattaini. Dick explained that the original appraisal submitted did not meet certain
appraisal standards, per the City Attorney's review, t2.2690) which triggered two (2)
outside reviews by other appraisers.
The two outside reviews were conducted by:
1) 3-5�90 Washington Appraisal Services,Inc. _ -
Garrett W.Wa.finer,MAI
2) 62690 Seattle Engineering Department
Joachim Pestinger,SR/WA
Both reviews determined that the Mattaini appraisal lacked proper documentation and
substanttation for the values given. Of most concern to both review appraisers,was the
I 55% reduction in easement value. The conclusion for the impact of easement rights
were determined to be unfounded and inconclusive.
When Mattaini questioned Dick's au.hority to deny his appraisal, Dick mentioned his
level of experience and stated in the 16 years he was in charge of street vacations for the
City of Seattle, handling 30 per ,year, a 25% reduction was normal for all easements
encumbering right-of-way to be vacated.
Mattaini agreed to revise his appraisal.
1
i
i
� I(
J
�i.
Dan Shane Appraisal
September 19, 1990
Page 2
1 8.23,90
Sixty (60) days passed since the June 26th meeting with Matuini and sixteen (16)
months passed since the Apri: 17, 1989 Public Hearing and we had not received a
revised_ppnisal. Property Management Section of Public Works sent a letter on 8.23-90
1 asking Dan Shane to declare his attention with regard to his street vacation. We set a
deadline of 30 days for him to submit a rc+ised appraisal or Public Works would
recommend to Council that his street vacation would be placed on file and that no
further action would be taken by the City.
t 9-14-90 Fridav
Dan Shane called and requested a meeting whh Dick Anderson to discuss his appraisal
rcgoiremcnts.
917-90 Monday
Before I could"It Dan Shane back,he called me Monday morning 9-17. 1 told him I had
checked with Dick and Dick said either of three(3)actions were necessary:
1. Revise Mutaini appraisal
2. Nave new appnisal made by.no[hcr qualified appraiser,or
(City wouO pick appraisal per new Streca.Vacation Ordinance a4266)
3, if no action by petitioner,Public Works would recommend Council file street _
vacation.
Dan said"Dick obviously does not like my,lumbers,so ask him to tell me how much he
wants for street nght-nf-way,and I'll pay it,"
I said"Dick will not play a numbers g1me with You
Dan said'Don Monaghan approved Chuck Maltaini as a qualified appraiser per his 6-"9
1 letter to Lynn Guttmann."
1
[ said that Dick ws adamant about the appraisal requirements and that Ma[uinis
? appraisal did not ^.ride adequate rutionai for the City to determine if it is in the best
interest of the public to vacate the subject street right-of-way.
v.naMiwA[umn
uaachmcnu. mpies o[�Eom
Refaa,xed U,nc"p""Icncr
iI
t
A
1
.J
_J
:. .. .._ ..'. -•.wr.+�+i Y•"`tlnl Y1.4WYIyW�w .:
ISHII III
1
CITY OF RENTON
Department of Planning/Building/Public Works
Earl Clymer, Mayor 1.rnn Guttmann, Administrator
August 23, 1990
G u v
Mr. 1}en Shane
RAMAC Incorporated �+' 1' 'V �/1
P. 0. Box
Renton, WA
98057 �
SUBJECT: RAMAC 51 AY N VACATION NO. 001-9^
BRONSOII WAY NORTH
L
Dear Mr. Shane:
It is the intent of this letter to inquire as to the stains of the appraisal for the above
referenced Street Vacation.
It w.s determined in a June 26, ICJo appraisal review meeting with City officials and your
appraiser, Chuck Mattaini, that the original appraisal did not meet certain appraisal
standards per two (2) outside reviews by other appraisers.
At the close of the review meeting it was concluded that Mr. Mattaini would revise his
appraisal to include substantiction and documentation for the values given. It has been
sixty (60) days since our June Milt meeting and sixteen (16) months since the April 17,
1989 Public Hearing and we have not received a revised appraisal.
If you wish to proceed with the Street Vacation process, please declare your intention to do
so. If we do not hear from you within thirty (30) days or by September 28, 1990, Public
Works will recommend to Council that this Street Vacation be placed on file and no further
action will be taken by the City.
Ven truly yours,
I
A, D
Arlene M. Haight \ QI 11;D`�P .�',v� r,
Property Management Super r 1
III, :ao:AMx.w I v �s11/al CjUT t
CM
=2 Wilh+ A—nu.South • `^r'f�/e r
Renton, WA 9W55 • I 1 �'Y r "' I ��/t✓"• y
M+d:yn J.P+ten<n.Citr Clerk Y" ��CCC]]]"' .. 11 r e, 1
200 I.,III Avenue South - Renton, Washington 9S055- (205)235-2631
i
� f
CITY OF RENTON
t
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE: February 25, 1991
TQ Jim Hanson
FROM: Dick Anderson I
STAFF CONTACT: Mike Benoit, Wastewater Utility nn
SUBJECT: Cottonwood Lift Station Replacement
I
The Wastewater Utility is preparing contract plans for reconstructing the Cottonwood Lift
Station. This lift station was installed in 1963 as the only viable method of servicing the
Riviera Apartments, the small grocery, and the recreation/dance hall. Because of its age,
continuing deterioration and location within Zone 1 of the Aquifer, we are looking to
have it replaced by the Fall of this year.
During our review of the submittal requirements for the Shoreline Permit, it was
suggested that a Conditional Use Permit would be required for the reconstruction of this
I:ft station. Answers to the following questions may clarify for our Division requirements
the Zoning Code puts on the Public utility facilities (water, sanitary sewer, and storm
sewer) required to service an area.
1) Are utility facilities that are required for development within zoning requirement
Incidental to the development?
2) With respect to public utilities, when is a Conditional Use Permit required? (i.e.
collector/transmission mains, pump stations, pressure reducing stations, wells, and
reservoirs.)
3) is reconstruction of an existing facility treated differently than new construction?
4) Is a Conditional Use Permit required for the reconstruction of the Cottonwood Lift
i Station? If so, please provide the code reference and procedure for us to make the
appropriate application.
Because of the potential health hazard of this station, we would like to complete
reconstruction as soon as possible. Therefore, we look forward tc an early response.
i
If you have any questions or need any additional information, please contact Mike Benoit
at Ext. 6206,
Cw-USEPM/PJA.MAadr
I
i
1 F
� J
q ♦ „yR.w
ENGINEERS
MANNERS
SCIENTISTS
1277.10(.447) 4
February 21, 1991
Mr. Mike Benoit
CITY OF RENTON
200 Mill Avenue So.
Renton, Washington lsr
Subject: Cottonwood Lift Station Shoreline Permit
Dear Mike:
I met with Law een Nicolay of the Development Services Division regarding the Shoreline
Permit for Cottonwood Lift Station last week. Duriug our review of the submittal requirements
for a Shoreline permit,Laureen informed me that a Conditional Use Permit was also required
for the Cottonwood Litt Station. A Conditional Use Permit will take about six months to obtain.
We did not expect that a Conditional Use Permit would be required for this facility and did not
schedule or budget for it.
We are proceeding with:he Shoreline Permit Application and SEPA Checklist. There is a great
deal of overlap between the submittal requirements for Conditional Use Permit and a Shoreline
Permit. Quite a bit of detailed information needs to be developed in order to submit for a
Shoreline Permit. Tb:e information will be produced as part of the design process.
According to Luureen,it will take the Development Services Division about four(4)months to
complete the SEPA review process for the Shoreline Permit and additional several months for
I its review of the Shoreline Perm'. After that the Department of Ecology most have a time
period for its review,which is specified by statute at 30 days. I would appreciate it if you would
talk to someone in the Development Services Division to we if there is anything we could do to
expedite the review of the Shoreline Permit. Also,it seems pretty onerous to also require a
Conditional Use Permit. Perhaps there is some special exemption or waiver process that
I.eureen was not aware of. and that I have not been able to find in the code. I would also
appreciate it if you could check oa that issue for me.
I lease get back to me as soon us pemible as if we do need to get a Conditional Use Permit;it
i
would be best to apply for both permits at the same time.
Sincerely,
RH2 ENGINEERING,P.S.
Gene Peterson
ce: Rick Herbert,RH2 Engineering
Dan Erv:%RH2 Engineering
RH2 ENGINEERING,P.S.
838315Ath Avenue N.E. • Suite 2W Opportunity Building • Redmond,WA 98052
(206)869-148A• (2t161453.0241 • FA%(2061869-7769 '
i
I
h
rK .`
CITY OF RENTON
MEMORANDUM
D
fit
DATE: February 12, 1991 C JV
J
TO: Dick Anderson rA
FROM: Randall Parsons
STAFF CONTACT: Mike Benoit
SUBJECT: Coltonwood Lift Station Grant Application
Upon discussion of this project with Marcel Szyskowski of the Department of Lcology, it it
has been determined, by his supervisor, that there is insignificant time available to review
and approve our predesign report. Without an approved report, we have no chance (per
Ecology guidelines) to receive a grant.
We could apply regardless, however, we feel Dust the Declaration of Severe Health Hazard
would be more of a political/public relations problem that would be justified by the slim
(if any) chance we would have of receiving a grant.
If yoo have any questions or need further information, please call me at Ext. 5548 or
Mike at Ext. 6206.
DOE-CTNW/RLPA4"Jt
r�l ACC ,
✓e rs'r ur
S.l�} /N FO O/Y GurL
Pile:-Oe34s.� R�rb/�T
iJic�C
CITY OF RENTON
MEMORANDUM
DATE: February 12, 1991
TO: Mayor Earl Clymer
FROM: Lynn Guttmann, Administrator
Planning/Building/Pubiic Works Department
STAFF CONTACT: Mike Benoit, Wastewater Utility
SUBJECT: Declaration of Cottonwood Lift Station as a Severe Public
Health Hazard
BACKGROUND:
The Cottonwood Lift Station was constructed in 1960. The station is located on the south
side of the Maple Valley Highway between Stoneway Concrete and the Riviera
Apartments and serves an area that includes these apartments, the Riviera Apartments, a
small grocery and a large recreation/dance hall (see enclos l map). The lift station is also
located in Zone 1 of the Aquifer Protection Area(APA)approximately 2,000 to 2,500 feet
upstream of City Wells 1, 2, 3, 8 and 9. The lilt station w9s constructed with an overflow
discharge to the Cedar River. There are no records of any major modifications of the
station.
DISCUSSION:
The City has great concerns and is making every effort to protect and preserve the quality
of its ground water, and as a - .ecific element of those resources, our aquifer. Toward
this goal, the City passed, in 1988, a Secondary Containment Ordinance. This Ordinance
establishes construction standards for new underground storage facilities, as well as
1 monitoring standards for new and existing facilities. Section 7-1206(c) of this Ordinance
states that all underground storage facilities which are located in Zone I of the APA must
comply with construction and monitoring standards for new facilities within Ig months of
adoption. The Cottonwood Lift Station has not met this requirement.
This station's wet well is an old single-walled unit that is corroded and whose ability to
resist leaks is unknown. Less than three years ago, a rupture was discovered in the 6'
force main. The rupture was repaired with a steel band, but the pipe is still in need of
reoair. The continuing aging and degradation of a facility constructed thirty years ago
m-reases the possibility of a sewage leak which could pose a4aaaw4la*re-threat to the City's
water quality.
In addit m, the wet well overflow is discharged to the Cedar River. While overflow
situations are infrequent, they could be prevented with adequate detention storage and
telemetry systems. The lift station is also susceptible to flooding from the Cedar River.
During the Thanksgiving 1990 weekend, the lift station had to be shut down because of
flooding of the electrical system.
L.. J
L
Mayor Earl Clymer
February 12, 1991 r°'�`.0 A-f '
Page Two 2 P'r"T�
mac
Nam.
By definition,a severe public health hazard is'a situation in which the potential for illness
Pzistr, but illness is not occurring or imminent, If remedial action is not taken, a severe
Public health hazard may become a public health emergency". Any sewage leakage poses a
hazardous threat to water quality. A structural failure of this lift station could all, raw
sewage o into the aquifer that provides the City with 95% of its water. A
mechanlcelrctri^.al failure could cause an overflow to the Cedar River which flows
t rI'D through two City parks, along a public trail, and empties into Lake Washingtory5t Coulon
ii Beach where the City maintains a public swimming facility.
In an effort to minimize the possibility of this station becoming a public health emergency
the City has:
1) Identified the potential problem;
2) Provided funding to take action aimed at reducing that potent.it
3) Engaged an engineering consultant to prepare a repot .'Jail .M wh,d
options may be available; and
11 Is has ing an engineering design prepared.
Among the items detailed in draft copies of ;he engineers report art .. wet ...II si-.ad to
provide at least one hour •ee^onse time in the occurrence of a power Pam, -dare tc
minimize the possibility of overflow and secondary containment sized t'. c,m.d.n
surround the wet well to prevent groundwater contamination in the ever o I ilk,
I
RECOMMENDATION:
It is the recommendation of the Planning/Building/Public Works Department that, to
acknowledge the potential problem and nosy other agencies of our concerns, the City
declare the Cottonwood Lift Station were 12u. Ring County -health hazer and that the Seattle-
concur. Health Department and State Department of Healt be notified and asked to
i
)�IRfui+J' 770
COTTNWp;MAlyf
��rrvrTaJ ?
J
CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DECLARING A
SEVERE PUBLIC HEALTH HAZARD.
WHEREAS, a severe public health hazard is described as a
situation in which the potential for illness exists, but illness
is not occurring or is imminent if remedial action is not taken, a
1
severe public health hazard may become a public health emergency;
and
WHEREAS, the Cottonwood Lift Station is located in Zone One
of the City of Renton's Aquifer; and
J WHER^.AS, the Cottonwood Lift Station is a thirty year old, -
lit single w led unit that is corroded and whose ability to resist
leaks is unknown; and
a
i WHEREAS, a failure or rupture of the Cottonwood Lift Station
{
would result in a leak which could pose a hazardous threat to the
City's water quality; and
WHEREAS, the City has budgeted for design/construction and
contracted with consulting engineer to perform the design;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCII. OF T-1- CITY OF RENTON,
WASHINGTON, DO RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
"CTION�_ The above recitals are four— o be true and
orrect.
Page 1
RESOLUTION No.
x
SEOTION II• The City Council, to acknowledge the potential
problem and notify other agencies of our concerns, hereby declares
the Cottonwood Lift Station a severe public health hazard,
j
j authorizes the Planninr,;Puilding/public Works Department to submit
this Resolution to the Washington State Department of Health for
concurrence and directs City staff to take all reasonable steps to
minimize the potential hazard in a timely manner.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this _ day of February, 1991.
1 t
Ma_11yn J. Petersen, City Clerk
j PASSED BY THE MAYOR this day of February, 1991.
Earl Clymer, Mayor
Approved as to form:
Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney
i
RES-CTNW/MAB:lf
1
1
Page z
�t
h�
M -
R '
n
1
y CITY OF RENTON
'LL Planning/Building/Public Works Department
Earl Clymer, Mayor Lynn Gottnan,Adelobtrater
February 12, 1991
RH2 Engineering, P.S.
8383 - 158th Avenue N.E,
Suite 200, Opportunity Building
Redmond WA 98052
Attention: ban Ervin, P.E. -
Subject: Cottonwood Lift Station
Dan, a
Enclosed is a copy of the Right-of Entry allowing for your survey for the Cottonwood Lift
Station.
If you have any questions or need additional informatio,, please contact me at 277-6206.
Very truly yours,
Michael A. Benoit
Wastewater Utility
RE-OTN W/MAI1:1(
I AIIN�m�nl
I
1
i
I
i
200 Mill Avenue South - Renton,Washington 98055
i
,l
1 February 12, 1991
1 City of Renton
}+ Planning/Building/Public Works Department
200 Mill Aver°ue South
Renton, WA 98055
1 hereby grant the City of Renton Right-of-Entry over my property, adjacent to Maple
Valley Highway and known as the Riviera Apartments, with the right to place stakes and
hubs, cut brush, trim trees, and perform other routine tasks normally associated with a
boundary and/or topographic survey.
The City of Renton, and/or their authorized agents, shall have the right without prior
institution of any suit or proceeding at law, at times as may be necessary, to enter upon
said property for the nurpose of collecting survey data without incurring any legal
obligation or liability therefore; provided that such survey shall be accomplished in such a
manner that private improvements shall not be disturbed or destroyed, or in the event that
they are distur •d or destroyed, they will be replaced in as good a condition as they were
immediately bclore the property was ealered upon by the City. .
This agreement will be in effect for a period of cae year from date of signature and may "#
be terminated by either party herein upon ten (10) days prior written notice unto the other
party.
Daniel C. Shane, cantor/ /
11
RO-R MAB:R
i
1
i
A .s G-Sf j
AcngH Mil BT
! vie AM1DFS'm1' executed I.triplicate by and between the CM OF RMNO@a
a Ibmiolpal Corporation under the laws of the Stato at Nashinetens hereinafter
refernN to ae nity.0 and CIL"S F. StU M, hereinafter referred to an e0mnrye
j N I T N E S S E T lit
M.9.1 tSs the City Is eontampirting the Construction of a sanitary mow
system by man, of a Loael Improvement District to serve tie Maplewood Addition
of the City of Benton and md)elnlw. and intrreenim,, Property$ and
VoV,"as Loner is presently developing the ee-aallod Cottomn,od Grove area
for mlltlple de011foge and libel pwpome end the owstruetieo of a trank san-
Mary,ewer to the lbo:aweed Addltian could also serve the Cetternoad Oral,
area older mrtain eoo&Vane. and
UT.WS, the City thr",h it. enjimering depertmmt Me dram plane for
the newtreation of said sanitary sewer P"tems said plans being numb and
1
j P.2.1-57. and
VBEB^ASs the City-,ngdrwar has eetlnrted that the total Coe! of Leber
l
and raterlai,.to effect the wort eostnplaaad mAsr slid Alms is$15,712.00
ell that the proportionate shore of the Owner for the benefits to property cored
or be1eB ➢urcMmd by Me from A. C. Bwdolls as per Feel Estate Cnntreee'
dated Fabrusry 10p 1959, would be t•5a OOO.OD and that the cost of materials for
the cxt^onion of the 11m oa,tmard teuard Maplewood from the fmvp @"Eton on
said plan, is aplouaim.taly 12s000e00s WJW THP.BP:'I C, the partial Mnta agree
Cud stipul,to a., rollea@a
la The atw, Caste and recital, are hereby found a be true and correct
In,il raepaatai _t !a further desemdru d that the land elevation in the propmed
Cettem,,j nroro arcs is sale that it will at mrait the dlryoael of cOva s
I*" the or;letir, truck systan by P,nvity Rms and that ether mane mill hale ,
i to be cetnhllnbed in ore'r to oar vtoo said area and to"toad cowl eorrie, te
67w Y:pl.-Md Aaiitiona
2. In esociderstlon of the rayenot f lire Th ,mvl Dollars (05s(A)0.nO)
by F`ror t, the M% in lieu of an a;w.orent by mane, of a Local Tmprmemad•
l I -1-
Zak
1 i
i
s
j
Dl,triet for a nemr "Biro, receipt of which is hereby arknowled"A, the
City propones am agree, to annatraat a "wage palm, station In the "nitary
Bever trunk lira n. sham me enQl more dr.wing 102.1-C7 and to fart"r
construct a aewage discharge pipe line from said pap, .Latin to the existing
City trunk nemr. That in eddition, the City will extend the trunk 11na
.pprcrimtely 9b feet taysrAe the Kam wed Addition are. .s an. an raid
drawings.
1, That in addition A the 35,000.1 portent In Item of as"ae.ent, the
rater will pmy too supplier for the material. "."eery to extend the t,o
line eaetvrly towards the Meplewon hom area, the estimated Bnount of $2,000.M.
It 1. eapresely aMer,toed am .greed that in the event the Local Tmprc,...t
District is forward 1n the Maplewood area for the Installation of sanitary mmrs
and sold*needed trunk It. is used and pweheted by said Local improvement
Div tri et as Its come etion vi th the City of Penton over .sm. that the
Owner will be reiabarerd for the amounts mpnded by him for said materials
(in the estimated _moot of free out of It, food, of "id local
IM,memnt District. if nc anm. LCC.I Improrement District 1. Completed
Lwa lamer shall not be entitled to any retmbnnemnt.
4. The Owner hew executed and deltrered to the City an easement mar
the land as sham bean, used by said sew;. .,ate. under engineer'. drawing
OB2.1-57, that the City shall harm th.right to go open other prepeettem ad.
Joining said easarent line for time purpcom of the work a ce.e.ry in the in-
e'.allxtbn o! Said eM ro 9,9".. Tie City that is the cebmteaotlon
of said eewace system it will replace the surface of the land covered by amid
""met , the Condition that it we iraodl.tcly precediso the cac..tmotion
worts w rvarly a May M.
5. City agrees to covsanos work on said tnud saver system pep station
as soon as po3albls and to proceed with told work with reasonable d:lte%hes.
\ All rC,3 done and all matnriala need in said wrrk stall to and remin the
property of the City and the City will assume all min"mare and oteration
of the trunk system on its cmrylmtion. It it tMotflcally s,,em toot 'he
conetrnotlon BM miotemeeo of the Collection Cysts.located on Owner's et
po et y and it, connection wl th tM trunk system shall be the sole reopen. bill ty
- i
I
r--
Y � W}V;♦ 11^I
{v.��`.... .. w-wau.n.e.n a uY -•.aww� V .rt :pYen. -..YkYIMP 14/Maa"r '.. a.Yr"..en«u... r..ete- r.� :r�r
r.'new
',e A
ir.
r
of the Owner aM all such work$ comtmetim aM ®tntmbnce elall he at the
Ow.r'e sole coat and It is -»reedy agreed that tore will he no �
further ehernas mda agaleat the Amer by way of aeseaeaants or otherwise for � e
.aid trunk eewr Sne'-lletton FesM . hL present ew.erette and pnreheea .f
3ubJert vrn rtl and that his only espn,e relatiew to el-ection with the --
tr•.mk llm of im City rill be the regular connection chargee and eereice
chn,"s as prorid.'. 1n the .,dire.., of the City.
6. It I. further agreed by the pries Prat any end all eMngee, mend-
vents or sodificatlonr of this a",emnt shall Marine effect]" only up.n bei.
to
reduced'wr'ting and elpad by t1b, prtlue heretr. Owner !tether egreoe flat thnrs S�+
ere no oral pre.isu or repres,nI.ti.m mde to his role ties to nla pe.psed
con,te..tlon otmr then contained in this a•.roeeeIt.
f IN WTWR SS if MM)F, we Mee hereunto affixed one be,III this l-day of
C.tober. 1959.
Clyf OF RBNIO1. OIMIX
ra E.
mrr7a
7ulem
1
t l
` F-
CITY OF RE1\TTON A1t1"'
Planning/Building/Public Works Department
Earl Clymer, Mayor Lynn Gattmn,Ada.inistratar
January 18, 1991
RH2 Engineering
8383 - 158th Avenue N.E,
Suite 200, Opportanit Building
pi aedmond, WA 98052
■ Attention: Dan Ervin, P.E.
1 Subject: Cottonwood Lift Station
Dan,
Please find enclosed your signed original of-cask Order Authorization No. 4(CAG 079-90). y
Consider this letter your Authonzation to Proceed with this project. if you havc any
questions, please contact Mike Benoit at 2"-6206.
Very truly yours,
and^.II L. Parso s, P.E.
Waztewater Uti ty Supervis -.,,a.
COTTON W D/RLP.N.AB Jf
Attr_hment
cc: Richard .�nderson
200 Mill Avenue So ah - P n, Washington, 98055 '
F �_
4
�Y
A
y
s \
{
t
I Oaoq
WEST LIWI ''GOUT
LOT 8 . i
3
i
y
Q
w �
EX SZI\16
�STOel.A MH
24"S�OitM SEV+EP.
t zkc,o�I
�1 I I
20�
1
t 2w8
1
o
1
MET20 mw r 1 I
1
6'3lN ITI►iL� -aw
..a. ivASEMEUT AS OEa-���®�Q �N ARE CU'�ED DOC�enE"N-T
t ,
COTTULIWOOD UF"r S7' pa-Tl0�3
e .
:y w
' p
v
r ,
PIO
ei
AO
•
Fr
. 1
i f
♦ f r y
4,
: e
• . s
s
N y
Y.
4r
r
CONCUnRENCE
DATE 1-,A
NAME -
CITY OF REN70N
MEMORANDUM
i
DATE: January 10, 1991
c
TO:
Marilyn Petersen
FROM:
16�nAruttmann
PingBldg/Public Works DePartment
STAFF CONTACT: Mike Benoit, Wastewater Utility
SUBJECT:
TASK AVTN00.1lATtON FOR CONSULTANT AGREEMENT: 4-1 AS
9
RH2 Engineering - C.AG 079_90
3
rr• w
Attached Please f.nd the Task Authorization 2PPtoved generic consultant agreements: for work tobe comPleted under one of our
RH2 Engineering CAG 079-90 - Sanitary/Water Engineering Services
Tas'v rder Authoriza_Son 70. 4 - Cott;nwowd Lift Station
in the amount of: $ 43,969.00
signed by tie Mayor and relu-- ul.cd fo thioff ice for final distribution. �nich needs to be
Thanks.
3� [rncomul�R ..gyp
I___ J
/ 4
lY
t AMAL
�.yy
MTN
1277.10
EXHIHIT A
Task 1 •Preliminary Engineering
A. Survey Infcrmation -
a. Provide horizontal and vertical control
b. Determine location or property lines and existing easements.
i
c. Locate all existing Utilities,where known.
B. Obtain as-built records of existing utilities.
C. Prepare p-eliminary site plan showing ultemative locations for evaluation with the
City.
D. Assist City in coordination with property owner for obtaining easement.
Task 2•Project Design
A. Prepare project site va.is
a. Design improvements to existing sewer, stormwater, water, electrical, and
telephone utilities.
1 b. Show location of proposed facility.
e. Develop grading and paving plan and details.
d. Develop plan for landscape restoration.
e. Develop demolitson plan of existing lift station.
B. Prepare mechanical plan and details
e. Select pumps and motors based on system hydraulics,estimated peak flows,
preferred pumping configuration,and system efficiency.
b. Develop configL'atiun of mechanical compmente of lift sfntion.
C. Prepare pion of wet we'l
a. Design secon�ary containment system for proposed wet well.
b. Provide details of wet well structural support, secondary containment
configuration,and monitoring system. r
D. Prepare electrical,control,monitoring,and telemetry plans.
s
a. Design configuration of new electrical system and rise electrical Components.
b. Devel..p design of pump control system including control logic.
a Develop design of new telemetry Fystem to interface with erdsting City i
telemetry.
E. Prepare structural plan of carport-type wood shelter and details.
i
a. Coordinate with City to determine preferred configuration of shelter
{
b. Perform structural analysis of proposed configuration for support system
design.
c. Prepare structural plans and details of proposed shelter including foundation,
framing,connections,and roofing system.
F. Prepare contract specifications. y
Task 3 Services During Bidding
A Provide construction cost estimate.
fI B. Provide 26 sets of b:d documents.
j C evaluate qualifications of low bidder and provide recommendations for award.
r31+ Task 4-Consur vtion Engineering
A. Provide periodic construction inspection to ensure compliance with project
specifications. (Asses,:=40 hours total).
B. Review equipment submittals.
C. Process change order a,if any.
i
D. Provide recommendations for payment.
E. Provide as-built drawings after construction is complete.
F. Renew 0&M Manuals.
Task 5 -Permitting and Agency Coordination
A Prepare and submit Shoreline Substantial Development Permit Application with
completed Environmental Checklist.
1 Coordinate with City Permitting Staff.
i
„
1
2. Coordinate with commenting agencies (e.g., Army Corps of Engineers,
Department of htisheries,Department of Ecology.
3. Prepare site plan with sufficient deL:;l for p,- using of permit application.
Assume site plan prepared on Task 1-C. Assume 5 copies total.
4. Assume no public hearing is required.
B. Assume no Conditional Use Permit or State lranchier. Permit required. (No
construction in state right-of-way.)
C. Assume no construction in wetlands.
i
J
Y
I
Exhibit B
CITY OF RENTON PUBLIC WORKS DEPARIME I,
COTTONWOOD I IFT STATION REPLACFMra
ENGINF.FRAG FEE.FSITMATF.
OCTOBER 3,1990
ME Ft{'IT.W'Qli
! ESTIMA-�'F.D ESI.MATED
1! TASK PF�SONNFI RATE Hgja AMO MT
+ 1. PRELIMINARYENGINEERING
1 PRINCIPAL $87
I PROI.ENGR. 4 SYS
i $� 6 S990
STAFF PROR.S 5S68
WORD PROCESSOR II $3q �
1 2. PROJECT DESIGN
PRINCIPAL $87 20 $1,740
PROJ.ENGR.111 $66 68 $4 488
STAFF ENGR.II $55 144 $7.920
j WORD PROCESSOR 11 S34 I $952
J. SERVICES DURING BIDDING
PRINCIPAL 587 0 SO
PROJ,ENGR.ID $66 4 $
STAFF ENGR.11 $55 12
! 264
WORD PROCESSOR II $34 6 S2204
4. CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING -
PRINCIPAL 587 2 $174
PRO].ENGR.ID $66 18 S1188
STAFF ENGR.11 $55 88 $4 840
i
WORD PROCESSOR II $34 17 S578
' 5. PERMITTING AND AGENCY COORDINATION
PRINCIPAL $87 4 $348
SENIOR PLANNER V $66 80 $5,280
PROJ.ENGR.IB $66 8 S528
STAFF ENGR.II $55 16 $880
WORD PROCESSOR II $34 8 $272
PROFESSIONAL STAi7°:JBTOT.4L $32,118
DIRECT PROJECT EXPENSES
SURE]JR SUBCONSULI ANT 51900
STRUM JRALSUBCONSULTANT $3,000
AUTOCAD COMPUTER SERVICES $3.500
PRIM ING AND PLOTTING 00
COPYING $2$800
MMEAGE $I50
TELEPHONE
$LOST
PROJECT EXPENSES SUBTOTAL S11,850
TOTAL FEE FSTTMATE $43.9"
i
mac,.
EXHIBIT C
SCHEDULE OF HOURLY RATES
Classification Rate Classification Rate -
Principal E IX $87/lir. Eng.Tech T III $56/Hr.
Principal E VIII $87/Hr. Eng.Tech I'll $SYHr.
Principe!E VII $82/Hr. Eng.Tech T I $38/Hr.
{ Project Mgr. E VI $77/11r. Comp.Spe. IV $66/11r.
Project Mgr. E V $7241r. Comp.Spe. III $6 VHr.
Comp.Spa. II $56/Hr.
Prcj.Eng. E IV $66/lir. Comp.Spa.I $52/Hr.
Proj. Eng. E I $$66/11r. Admin.Aset. $41/I1r.
Staff Eng. E 11 $551Hr.
Staff Eng. E 1 $52/1-17. Word Proc,III $41/Hr.
Senior Planner V $66/I1r. Word Proc. 11 $34/Hr.
Eng.Tech.T V $6611r. Word Proc. I 026111r.
Eng.Tech.T IV $61/11r.
Office Aide $22/Hr.
IN-HOUSE SERVICES
In-house Copies 8-L'2 x 11 $ .10/Ea.
In-house Copies 8-Y2 x 14 $ "5/Ea.
In-house Copies it x 17 $ .50./Ea.
In-house Blueprints 24 x 36 $ 1.20 Ea.
In-house Computer $6.00/Hr.
In-house CAD System $25.00/Hr.
In Louse CAD Vellums $15.00/Ea.
Mileage $ .30/MBe
FAX $3.00/Sheet
PURCHASED SERVICES
All purchased prin.-ng,copying,miscellaneous,and subconsultant services are billed at cost plus
i
t'ryr�q�'1
� t
a' �
h
SUMMARY COVER SHEET
WFORMATION: Prepare conservation Plan in'o.opliance _
with East King Courty Coordinated Water System.
PROJECT: Water Cr.,Iservation Plan ,
;funded through Professional Services non-capital accounlj
PROJECT
NUMBER: W-1068
CONSULTANT: RH 2 Engineers,P.S.
8087 158th Av NE
Suite 200,
Redmond l.A 98052
AGREEMENT TASK ORDER AMOUNT: ES.900.00
NUMBER: CAG-079-90 NUMBER: 1
AUTHOR12AilON
ORDER NUMBER: 1
ACCOUNT
NUMBER: 401/000/018.504.20.41(18)
DE 1CRIPTION The purpose of this project Is to prepare a water conservation plan in
OF PROJECT: compliance with the East King County Coordinated Water System Plan.
and as nese.sary to fulfill the requirements of the State Department of
t
Health for apporval of th?1990 Comprehensive Water System Plan.
i
P
1
I
E.XIIBI""B'
T.4 K ORDER AUTHORIZATION
Cit) of Re. �n
Project No.
Name of Project Water Conservation Plan
Master Agreement No. CAG-079.90
'iask Order Authorization No.-I
The City desires to authorize engineering services pursuant to the Master Agreement entered
into with RH2 Engineering. P S. and executd on and identified as M- ter
Agreeme.it No.CAG-079-90
All provisions in the Master Agreement remain in effect except as expressly modified by this �
work Authorization,and are incorporated herein by reference.
Scope of Task Order
I. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED WORK
II. ESTIMATE OF HOURS AND COST
HI. SCHEDULE FOR COMPLETION OF AUTHORIZED WORK
2V. ADDITIONAL ITEMS TO BE FURbiISHED BY THE
CONSULTANT
SUMMARY OF FEE FOR ENGPJEERINC SERVICES
Direct Salary Cost . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . $3.236.00
Overhead Coot(including
payroll additives) 160.19 % $5.183.00 1
Sub-Total $8,419.00
Net Fee .. . . . .. . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . .. ... . .. . .. 12% $ 1.010.00 ._.
Direct Non-Salary Costs:
a. Travel and per diem . . . . , . . _ ... , y 66.00
b. Reproduction expenses . $ 280.30
c. Computer expense $ 125.00
d. Outside consultants . . . . . . . . . .. .. . . $ 000.00
e. Other(specify) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .. . $ 000.00
Total $ 471.00
Sub-Total $ 9.V9.00
GRAND TOTAL $ 9.900.00
I
t
1
i
1
tnAID-27-0510 QMUWM LIFT SATICN Rom' - Working File 3
EXHIBIT"B"(cont.)
City of Renton
Project No.
e Name of Project Water Cons —It—ion Plan
t Master A --greement No.
Task Order Authorization No. 1
If you concur in this Task Order Authorization and agree to the items as stated above,please
sign in the appropriate spaces below and return to this office for final action.
The masi¢.um amount payable under this work authorization inclusive of all fees and other
costs is$ 9.900.00
All work under this work authorization shall be performed pursuant to the tsrms,conditions,
specifications,and limitations contained in the Master Agreement.
SUMMARY OF PAYMENT UNDER WORK AUTHORIZATIONS
Prior Task Task Order
Order Authorization
Authorizations No. 1 Total
Direct Salary Cor' 0.00 3,236.00 _
3 236 00
Overhead 0.00 5.183 00
(including Payroll - —5,183 00
additives)
Direct Non-Salary Costa 0.00 471.00
471.00
Net Fee 0.00 1,01Q 00
— _ 1,010.00
Total 0.00 9,900.00
— 9.900.00
/ G L
Consultants Signature
Appro h rjuthority
AUTHORIZING ORDINANCE
NUMBER: 1
ACCOUNT Date of Am -ization:
NUMBER: 401/000/18.534.20.14(18)
PROJECT No.
u-1068 t O
1'
1
J
1
i~
CITY OF RENTON
WATER CONSERVATION PLAN
SCOPE OF TASK-ITEM I
DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED WORK
PURPOSE: The purpose of this project is to prepare a water conservation plan in compliance
with the requirements of the East King County Coordinated Water System Plan,
and as necessary to fulfill the requirements of the State Department of Health
for approval of the 1990 Comprehensive Water System Plan.
Task 1
Objective: Identify City,county and state requirements for the contents of the Plan.
Approach: Obtain copies of tho East King County Coordinated Water System Plan,
Seattle Water Conservation Plan, and the W.A.C. governing
comprehensive water system plans. Review and compile a list of
requirements and objectives for the Water Conservation Plan. Meet with
City staff and review regulatory requirements. Discuss and identify
additional City requirements for the Plan contents. Prepare a chapter
outline and objectives paper, and meet with City staff for review,
' comment and approval. Prepare final chapter outline.
Product: Chapter outline,list of plan objectives
'task 2
Objective: Compile system opera,—*-g and demand data necessary to establish base-
line historical demands. Identify demand projections.
Approach: Use data compiled from the Comprehensive Water System Plan to
prepare the following figures:
� 12 year demand(MGD)
Q 12 year demand(MGD'customer)
• 12 year supply (MGD)
12 year supply (MGD/customer)
• Projected demand(MGD,'customer)
i
luentify ti,e water sa,,inge net....;,.y t, Imply with the requirements of
Task 1.
Product: Demand figures for use in Plan
i
1
l.� J
aF
Task 3:
Objective: Develop conservation measures and conservation program elements.
Approach: Identify the elements of a City Administered Conservation Plan. Use the
Seattle Conservation Plan as a base and modify or delete program
elements that are not compatible or pertinent in the Renton System. Add
additional program elements that may be sp:cific for Penton's water
system and customer base. Develop cost estimates of each program or
program element based on the personnel and hardware costs involved. {
Develop conservation estimates based on the econometric model prepared
for the Seattle Conservation Plan,and the East King County Coordinated
Water System Plan. Compare conservation estimates with other water `
users throughout the West Coast to determine the potential accuracy of
the locally developed econometric model, Identify a preferred
implementation schedule for each program element. Develop evaluation
criteria to assist in determining the effertiveness of the program
implementation and a matrix for reaching conservation targets.
Product: List of program elements,cost of program elements,projected savings o'
program elements
Task 4:
t
1
Objective: Document previous task, in report form.
Approach: Prepare a water conservation report plan that is developed and printed
in the same style and formal as the Water Comprehensive Plan.
Summarize results of Task 1 through 3. Include a listing of each program
element,its cost,implementation schedule,and procedures for evaluating
its effectiveness.
Product: Six(6)copies of draft plan. Fifty(501 copies of final plan
Y.
,
2 ? ^ t 2
h ®�a Ila jz■
��. as USSIR _ }
..... _ . . ,
! b �§ Remus w�. .\ � /y . .
.. .
j
ƒ! PattiG 25 is !
ate• 81 §22951 2 ! } §
P:
;
\
§§ \ )
§ (\ §
p
L
't. (. T
x
'yA ?�r+4 tiM
>E '
t F t
f_.
u f
}e� 4YFeY�lY4Y+1W'.WFCffu- RMIk bYI�AY9rlAIfYYRiGML ^.-. n'� �
T
1
CITY OF RENTON
WATER CONSERVATION PLAN
SCOPE OF TASK ITEM W
SCHEDULE FOR COMPLETION OF AUTHORIZED WORK
1991
1 1991
NOVEMBER DECEMBER JANUARY FEBRUARY MARCH APRIL — MAY
TASK ONE T
RENEW EKCCWSP
RENEW SLATTLE PLAN Im.
_y IDENTIFY REOURFMERTS
1 PREFARE CHAPTER pUT11NE
I .AulARE PLAN OBJECTIVES
TAA —
DEMAND FMRES 1
I CD SERVADON TARGETS
--;
�7ASK PLAN REMENTS i
COS'S
CONSIFVA%N ESTIMATES ' A�
COMPARE ES'.UTE5 L
IMPLEMENTATION SD"LAF 1 1 I
EVAULATKA CRITERIA ;
TASK FOUR
PREPARE REPORT
RENEW MEE RINGS a d
s4
y " �
f
/ EXIST. CONC.
SIOEWAL K, Pl
p 75 1
EXIST. VE T.
CURB L G TE
iy EXIS
U CUT � ` 0 0
I / 0
co J,
L
�✓ o
� F{T
v - Y
N
t Igo Z
w
MONTEREY MANOR APARTMEP
3�
T 75 1° - 50'
EXIST. VE T.
CURB 8 G TE 1
N EXIS
CURB UT
E T. r
O B
U CUT. VED
�. / / � 24• ,t0
St N
�k
wp• 125 G
0.1
0� =u°da�GUjKRU4G COMPANY Y �'
10
Z
ONTEREY MANOR APARTMENTS j
� �".x�r ice"..•
r
M1�
,r
x A• - 1 l...re � I
m '
at '
CITY OF RENTON
MEMORANDUM ;,• ,
DATE. September 19, 1990
TO: Dick Anderson,Utility Systems Division Manager
FROM: Arlene Haight,Property Id"agementa_
r
r SME(-T RAMAC 3ttect Vacation No.001-89
Bronson Way North
I
Chronology of contact with Dan Shane(RAMAC)and his appraiser.
i k Dic A
� Dirk Anderson,Davc 'fibbo[, and Arlenr I laight met with Dan Shane's appraiser, Chuck
MattaiM. Dick explained that the original appraisal submitted did not meet certain
s review, (2-26901 which triggered two (2)
appraisal standards, per the City Attorney
outside reviews by other ppraiscrs.
Tile two outside reviews were conducted by
1) 3. ,:D Washington Appraisal Services,Inc.
cyarectt W.Wa!dner,MAI
2) 62_620_ Seattle Engineering Depattment
! Joachim Pestinger,SR/WA
iteth reviews determined that the Matlaini appraisal lacked proper documentation and
substantiation for the values given. Of most concern to both review appraisers, was the
55% reduction in easement value. The conclusion for the Impact of ease!. rnt rights
were determined to be unfounded and inconclusive.
I
When Mittaini questioned Dick's authority to deny his appraisal, Dick mentioned his
level of experience and stated in the 16 years he was in charge of street vacations for the
City of 'cattle, handling 30 per year, a 25% reduction was normal for all easements
encumbering right-of-way to be vacated.
i
Mauami agreed to revise his appraisal.
r
41
y
/ Dan Shane Appraisal ,
September 19, 1990
.' Page 2 _
823-900
Sixty (60) days passed since the June 26th meeting with Mattaini and sixteen (16)
months passed since the April 17, 1^89 Public Hearing and we had not received a _
revised appraisal, Property Management Section of Public Works sent a letter on B-23-90
asking Dan Shane to declare his attention with regard to his street vacation. We set a
deadline of 30 days for him to submit a revised appraisal or Public Works would
recommend to Council that his street vacation would be placed on file and that no `• �'
further action would be taken by the City.
It} 4-90 rrid�
Dan Shane called and requested a meeting with Dick Anderson to discuss his appraisal ti•
requirements.
9-17-90 Monday
Before I could call Dan Shane back,he called me Monday morning 9-17. 1 told him 1 had R.iJprT
checked with Dick and Dick said either of three(3)actions were necessary:
1. Revue Mattaini appraisal $+• -
2. Have new appraisal made by another qualified appraiser,or
(City would pick appraisal per new Street Vacation Ordinance#4266)
3. If no action by petitioner,Public Works would recommend Council file street
V3C31101..
Dan slid"Dick obviously does not like my numbers,so ask him to tell me how mw „c
wants for street right-of-way,and I'll pay it."
1 said"Dick will not play a numbers game with you"
Dan said"Don Monaghan approved Chuck Mattaini as a qualified appraiser per his 68-89
letter to Lynn Guttm3nn."
I said that Dick was adamant about the appraisal requirements and that Mattainis
appraisal did not provide adequate rational for the City to determine if is is in the best
interest of the public to vacate the subject street:fight-of-wry.
yrlurcrnM:1/bt,
u,uhmen.�: u,nk+of about
Relertnmt Gvaeatwxkn<'e
J
CHARLLS M. MATIAINI
RFAL ESTATE APPRAISER
222 William- Avenue South
Renton, Washington 98055 _
(206) 226-9681
November 15 1989
Ramac Incorporated
P. 0. Box 653
Renton WA 98051
Re Real Estate Appraisal
Property Located
Proposed Street Vacation
Bronson Way N:.rth
Dear Mr. Shane:
In accordance with your request, I have made an appraisal of the above
described premises for the purpose of estimating the market value as of
This appraisal is to be used as a basis for estimating a price which
the owner should receive if the property were offered for sale on the
current market.
Market value is defined as being the highest price estimated, in terms
of money, that a willing buyer would pay a willing seller, both parties
being familiar with the property and all the uses to which is might be put,
allowing a reasonable time for exposure in the market.
As a result of the appraisal and analysis, it is my opinion that the
current market value of said property is:
Twenty—two thousand ($22,000.00) dollars.
The supporting aata and the analys±s and conclusions upon which this
value is based are contained in the accompanying report.
Sincerely,
Charles M. Mattaini
Real Estate Appraiser
—J
I
CERTIFICATE OF VALUE
I hereby certify I have no present or prespective interest in the
subject property. 1 have examined both the interior and exterior of the
improvement. It is assumed the title is marketable and only the fee
simple title has been appraised. The content of this report is to be
used only with the permission of the appraiser an4 use of any part
without referring to the whole appraisal shall invalidate it. The infor-
mation contained herein is based on the experience and knowledge of this
appraiser, and information furnished by others can only be assumed to be
correct. She issuance of this repor' shall not require the testimony of
this appraiser in court unless prev jus arrangement has been made.
THiS APPRAISAL IS SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING LIMITING CONDITIONS
This appraisal covers the property as described in this report and
the areas and dimensions as shown herein are assumed to be correct.
I have made no survey of the property and assumed no responsibility
in eonnectinn with such matters. Any sketch or identified survey of the
property in this report is only fcr the purpose of assisti he read:r
to visualize the property.
Responsible ownership and competent management are assumed.
No responsibility is assumed for matters- involving legal or title
considerations.
The information identified in this report as being furnished to me by
others is believed to be reliable, but no responsibility for its accaracy
is assumed.
Possession of this report or a copy thereof, does not carry with it
the right of publication, nor may it be used for any purpose by any but
the client for whom it was made without the consent of the appraiser or
the client.
I am not required to give testimony or attendance in court by reason
of this appraisal unless arrangements have been made therefor.
The appraiser has n, present or contemplated interest in the property
appraised.
The allocation of total value to land or to buildings as shown it
this report is invalidated if used separately in conjunction with any
other appraisal.
J
J
tY a 1
r � sF4 i
ti
n t
CHA.RLES M. MATTAINI
Real Estate Appraiser
b
- APPRAISAL REPORT -
BASIS OF THE APPRAISAL4
Purpose and The purpose of this appraisal is to estimate the market
Function value of the land lying within the street right-of-way
of Bronson Way North, located between N.E. 3rd Street
and its terminus at the East boundary right-of-way line -
of Primary State Highway No. 1.
The market value in Fee Simple Ownership is the estimated _
amount at which the property might exchange between a ': �
willing buyer and seller with equity to both parties.
Effective Date The effective date of the appraisal is November 1, 1989.
Function The function of this appraisal is reportedly to provide
necessary documentation for the proprosed sale and
acquisition of the vacated right-of-way.
DESCRIPTIVE DATA
Subject The subject right-of-way property is described as:
Property
That portion of Bronson Way North (County Road 114 and
( 174) located in the West half of the N.E. quarter of
Section 17, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, M.M.;
bounded on the S.W. by the Northeasterly right-of-way
and on the North by the Southerly right-of-way of SR405
I K-line right-of-way (Thirc Ave. No. a tension).
'• Per Washington State Highway Dept. right-of-way map,
SR405, Junction SSH No. 2M to Junction PSH No. 2 in
j Renton, Sheet 7 of 10.
Bronson Way North is a 60 foot wide street right-of-way
extending a distance of 277 feet, plus or minus, in a
North/Southwesterly direction, containing a total ground
area of 18,560 square feet, plus or minus.
The North 150 feet, plus or minus, is asphalt surfaced
and provides acres° to the two abutting developed apart-
ment properties on the West. The remaining 150 feet of
the right-of-way is unimproved and below grade of the
abutting lard on the East and above grade of the land to
the North. There are no sidewalks or curbs in the
right-of-way. Located within the underground right-of-
way are sewer and water mains. Electric transmission
lines are overhead.
J
M
� L
RIGHT-OF-WAY, BRONSON W. Y, RENTON - 2
SPECIFIC DATA
Conditions The proposed vacation of the right-of-way is subject to the
following conditions: v
1. Vacate the roadway right-of-way except that portion
50 feet from the cneterline of N.E. 3rd/N.E. 4th and allow
ingress and egress to Shari's Restaurant property and the
apartment building. PR
2. City to retain all existing easements for utilities, r
both private and public.
3. City is to receive a document that shows evidence
Puget Power has been granted an easement for their needs.
i
4. Additionally, another document is to be submitted
that grants permanent access along the easement to the
Fanning property, southwest corner of the area.
5. A contract is to be formulated with the City which
grants the right to purchase propertyin the future for
right-of-way acquisition at the price initially paid us
for it, plus CPI and improvement costs.
6. Also, the easement to the southerly property where
Shari's and the Silver Cloud Motel sit is to include
secondary emergency access,
The above easement interests cover surface, subsurface and
overhead rights of use and negatively limits the use and
rights of gee Simple Ownership. By City Ordinance, abutting
property owners are granted abutters reversion rights in the
vacation of street right-of-ways. The proportional rever-
sion of the right-of-way lands to abutting properties is
shown on the attached map and summarized as follows:
1. Tract C Abutting Monterey Manor property. Asphalt surfaced •rea,
sloping grade in conformity with adjoining land. Land
area 4,969 sq. ft.
2. Tract D Abutting unimproved City of Renton land. Ashpahlt surfaced
and in conforming grade. Land area 4,723 sq. ft.
3. Tract E Abutting unimproved Ramac property. Sloping unimproved
land lying well below grade of adjoining 81 zoned land.
Land area 5,333 sq. ft.
4. Tract F Abutting Tax Lot 83 Apartment Complex. Unimpro,,ed land
lying above grade of abutting ownership, multi-family
zoned land. Land area 3,534 sq. ft.
J TOTAL LAND AREA IN RIGHT-OF-MAY - 18,559 sq. �t.
1
t
NY �
a,
34• S
w
4'
>a ,
F
RIGHT OF MAY, BRONSON WAY, RENTON - 3
Highest and Highest and best use is defined as that reasonable and
Best Use probable use for which the property is adapted or capable
of being used. Factors being considered in determining
the highest and best use of the subject property are loca-
tion, physical features and restrictive easements, and
requirements as described in the preceding paragraphs.
Giving consideration to the limited use of the subject as
impressed with easenent interests and other related
conditions of vacation of the street, it is the opinion
of the appraiser that the highest and best use of the
right of way land is its present use. Any open market use
as a single entity is not probable. The alternate
secondary use is in assemblage with abutting ownership
usage.
VALUATION BAoIS
Evaluation The evaluation of a right of way, typically impressed with
varied easement interests such as the subject, presents a
unique appraisal problem as there are no open market sales
upon which to base an opinion of value. Evaluation of the
proportional reversional parcels in the right of way is a
two-step process:
1. Analysis of the ;.cement rights existing in the
right of way to determine spe.ifically what those rights
of use are, and other cond+Lions as specified in the
proposed vacation and reversion of the right of way.
2. Estimating what percentage of the total fee value
is represented by easement rights.
Comparison The attached sales provide the basis of comparison analysis
to develope an estimate of fee value of the abutting land.
Value of the apportioned right of way -eversion parcels is
estimated by adjusting the fee value of the right of way
for:
1. Location, physical features and adaptability to
abutting land use.
2. Easement rights and contingent conditions of the
proposed vacation of the street right of way.
The combined ownership right and the easement holders'
rights represent total fee value. The value of an ease-
ment is represented by a percentage of the underlying fee
value.
a
FW ` ri
n
4 ,
, r
i
R,
RIGHT OF WAY, BRONSON WAY, RENTON - 4
Comparison Allocation of component easement rights is:
(cont.)
Subsurface - 10% Surface - 35% Overhead - 10%
c p..
The above data is based upon the appraiser's general
knowledge and experience in the appraisal and acquisition
of easement rights. ;^
CORRELATION AND VALUE CONCLUSIONS t�
Estimates Based on the foregoing valuation procedure, the following
of Value estimates of value are developed for the subject right of ,
way parcels:
Parcel C Land area 4,969 sq. ft.
Unencumbered fee value (multi-family zone)
4,969 sq. ft. @ E3.OG p/s.f. = $14,907
Easement rights
55% of fee vale- = $8,207 rounded off
Value of the encumbered fee $6,700.00
Parcel D Land area 4,723 sq. ft. (RI-P1 zone)
Unencumbered fee value
4,723 sq. ft. E2 50 p/s.f. = $11,807
Easement rights - 55% of fee value = $6,497 r.o.
Value of the encumbered fee $5,310.00
Parcel E Land area 5,333 sq. ft. (81 zone)
UnencumbereC fee value
5,333 sq. ft. @ $3.00 p/s.f. = $8,800
Easement rights - 531 of fee value - E8,80C
Value of the encumbered fee $7,200.00
Parcel F Land area 3,534 sq f. (multi-zone)
Unencumbered fee value
3,534 sq. ft. @ $1.75 p/s.f. = $6,185
Easement rights
55% of fee value = $3,400 rounded off
Value of the encumbered fee $2,785.00
� J
1 'rY tK
RIGHT OF WAY, BRONSON WAY, RENTUN - S
SUMMARY OF INDICATED VALUES
PARCEL C $6,700.00
PARCEL D $5.310.00
PARCEL E $7,200.00
PARCEL F $2,785.00
i
Indicatea value of proportional reversion of street right of
way is:
$21,995.00 round off to $22,000.00
I
Respectfully submitted,
i Charles M. Mattaini
Real Estate Appraiser
I
i
1
I
if
_J
RIGHT OF WAY, BRONSON WAY, RENTON - 6 -
s .
UNIMPROVED LAND SALES
MULTI-FAMILY ZONE y
SALE SALE. DATE LAND AREA ZONING SALE PRICE PRICE P/SQ. FT.
1. 1/89 139,662 s.f. R-4 $315,000 $2.26
2. 12/88 49,605 s.f. R-4 $110,000 $2,22
3. 9/88 175,744 s.f. R-3 $425,000 $2.42
COMMERCIAL ZONE -
1. 10/88 33,656 s.f. 8-1 $123,000 $3.65
2. 12/88 50,530 s.f. MP $209,000 $4.14
3. 11/88 46.610 s.f. B-1 $200,000 $4.30
COMMENT: All of the sales are located in the general periphery area of the
Renton City Limits.
The Multi-Family zoned parcels are capable of similar unit density
use.
All public utilities service the properties.
All other factors influencing value are considered similar to the
abutting lands of the subject right of way.
The sales require adjustment upward for date of sale and land size.
The Commercial zoned properties are considered slightly superior
to the subject abutting Commercial zoned land in overall use and
access features.
Adjustment upward for sale date and downward for use and access,
and considered offsetting factors.
it
r
r'
* '.
.k
t
y
F
L'r t't
_Fmt
r eft+r �-
/
VICINITY :00
° a \ Location Map '•',
is JOA,
04
q� !
y ••f,y
��b' /lr .tf/f/r ar� '� •� �
7i
�� ': � 1,�9'S`�. 7 /� ,r J'•'r••''• �••'rry� wry„ `f 3 ap.
.e / •:ti w .� �M�. �'aa//���/ SubJsct t. w�
,ISs 'pre-• :,.�
NgpN i� ui
a 1
^�f{!
1, ,1, ••. L tw. •• t �� Mr.r. 44v,N F
k •a. r
361fh11 ° ,,'f�1fV• Sins ` • 1 I•rN
jolt'TO
f'As
a
R 888.6 Subl"t Prop" �
L 176,34 \ \
ncn 41A 01KG1• ya'E
l /oD.' Re50.0 0
30.00'
N221WS0'E� N67'49'10'W \ "y
18.21' ,
/. 0 Z
82.56'
F„ �"
x
o � 'E ON
N6BRON5O
Y{{ i
AR�AOF TRACTS:
TRA6 %Co • 4969 s0.ft
A .
:,TRACT 'U'• 4T23 K.ft.
't?�? TRACT;Ao- 5333 fa.fI.
TRACT 'F'• 3534 s4.ft. 01 M 4e•
.� 4
i
T
CITY OF RENTON
MEMORANDUM
DATE; February 21, 1990
TO' Larry Warren, City Attorney
Public Works Director
FROM: Lynn tJLlfi
STAFF CONTACT: Arlene Haight, Property Management
SUBJECT; MATTAINI APPRAISAL
RAMAC STRegr VACATION 001-$9
PORTION OF BRONSON WAY NORTH
Dear Larry.
Attached hereto is a copy of the Charles t - Mattaini appraisal for the above requested
street vacation for your review together with the 1990 King County assessed valuations for
the RAMAC property and the Park Place short plat.
Since the amendment to the street vacation ordinance has not yet been adopted by the City
Council we must operate under the constraints of the old ordinance and consider the
Matlaini appraisal as submitted by the petitioner.
As a result of Mattaini s appraisal he has [:aced a$22,000.00 current market vaiuc on the
18.559 square feet of street right-of-way to be vacated, which equates to$1.19 per square
fool. The King County assessed valuation for Lot 3 of;which
Park Place short plat, which lot
abuts the proposed street vacation, equates to r'
per square foot, t
Taking into consideration the negative affects �' -I,e easements that will be retained over
the street right-of-way proposed for vacation and the comparables given, please advise if
you find the $22,000.00 appraisal figure acceptable to the City,
attachments
m.tt/ueh//.
ntt.�i'icn ov.z7/yv
PUBLIC LN_.i S DE.oT.
vS CITY OF "NITOW)
Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney
Daniel Kellogg - Mark E. Barber - David M. Dean - Zaneua L. Fames -
Terence Lynch - Robert L. Sewell, Assistant City Attorneys
February 26, 1990
TO: Lynn Guttmann, Public Works Director
FROM: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney
RE: Mattaini Appraisal - Resist: Street Vacation 001-89
Portion of Bronson Nay North
Dear Lynn:
I an somewhat amused at the appraisal presented by Ratiac. You
probably don't know that Ramac sued the city of Renton and the
state of Washington for blocking access to %..at is now the Shari's
Restaurant and Silver Cloud Motel. At that time Rainac's
appraisers valued the property at over $10.00 per square foot. We
now find the value is only $1.19 per square foot. I was under the
impression that the value of real estate was rising and not
falling.
The use of assessed valuations is always somewhat tricky,
particularly if the property has not been reassessed for several
years and the market in real estate is very volatile, as it is
now. Also, the adjoining parcel with the $1.50 per squire foot
value is one with reasonably severe slope problems.
I do not have a good :eel as to the square iootage values of
property in that general area. I note that the appraiser uses
values anywhere from 53.0. per square foot down to $1.75 per
square foot. If we are to assume that the $1.50 per square foot
is not unreasonable, then the appraiser's land values appear to be
justified.
The appraiser then adjusts that value by removing 55% of the value
of the land because of various easements that the city is to
retain. It is very difficult to assess how much of the value is
taken by the retention of easements. Initially, it would appear
to me that any diminishment in value for an overhead easement is
not justified, as I know of no reason why the city of Renton needs
an overhead easement. Why do we need a surface easement if the
city is vacating the street? I understand that there are
utilities in the road and we would therefore need a subsurface
easement. If we use only the subsurface easement, then only 10%
of the value would be diminished, and I would find that
Post Office Boa 626 • 101J S 2nd Street - Renton. Washington 98057 • (206) 255-8678
J
yV
1>
x
Lynn Gattmann, Public works Director
February 26, 1d90
.fi
Page 2
reasonable. If in fact the city does retain a surface easement,
Chen a further adjustment is necessary.
From the inform.,tion provided to me 1 cannot state whether or not
I believe the appraisal is reasonable. I know that it is not as
unreasonable as some that I have seen. I also know Mr. Mattaini
an' `now, that lie is advanced in years. I deposed him within the
lasL year and he had trouble following my questions and the
concepts that I presented to him. That does not make me feel more
comfortable with this appraisal.
if the city has any strong reservations about the appraisal I
wood suggest that we have the appraisal reviewed by an outside
appraiser. A review appraisal should not be unduly expensive.
After the review appraisal, if we are uncomfortable with the value
set, then the city can conduct its own appraisal to establish
value.
If I can provide you with any further i ormation on this please
let me know. 1
Lawrence J{ War:en
LJW:as.
Encl.
c c. .:ayor
Brent McFall
A8.53:11.
1
i
J
WASHINGTON APPRAISAL SERVICES, INC.
10232 N.E.101h STREET-BELLEVUE.WA.98004 4209 (206)4531456
March 5, 1990 � --
CITY OF RENTON
The City of Renton Engineering Dept. —
4 Public Works Department `
200 Mill Avenue South
Renton, Washington 98055
Attn: Arlene Haight u
Re: RAMAC Street Vacation Number 001-89
WAS. 90-018
j Dear Ms. Haight:
1
I At your request, I have reviewed the appraisal prepared by Charles M. Mattaini, prepared
'- for the purpose of estimating the market value of that portion of Bronson Way North to
be vacated. Per your request,my services are limited to a desk review;and, thus. I am not
i capable of expressing an independent opinion as to the market value of said property.
i
In general, I would say the report is extremely brief and lacks the required documentation
and substantiation typically found in an appraisal reporr. Of most conmm to me, is the
derivation of the casement rights at 55% of fee value. This conclusion may or may not be
warranted; however, there is inadequate substantiation. A broker or sales person may well
be entitled to express an opinion based on knowledge and experience. An appraiser,on the
oth, hand, is required to substantiate his conclusions based on market data.
Under"Correlation and Value Conclusions,' page 4,there are several mathematical errors
which, while mino., should he cleaned up.
i
Parcel C:
55% of fee value, equals $8,199, not $8,207.
Parcel D:
Easement rights, 55% of fee value, equals $6,494, not S6,497.
Parcel E:
Unencumbered fee value, 5,333 square feet times$3.00 pc- square foot
equals$15,999, not$8,800. Easement rights at 55% of fee value equals
$8,800, not 53%.
J
ice. J
r
Arlene Haight
March 5, 1yy0
I :ge 2
On page 6, the comparable sales W. not identifiable based on the information provided.
Further, a much more specific analysis of each sale, comparing it to the abject proper-,.is typically required. The multi-family zoned sales indicate a range .rom 52.2.: per square
foot to$2.42 per 'quarc foot, and the appraiser concludes a multi-family value of$3.00 per
square fnpt Too commercial zoned sales reflect a range of from S3.65 per square foot to
$4.30 per square foot, and the appraiser concludes a commere-'al value of$3.00 per square
Coot. In both cases, it is felt that adequate substantiation and documewation have not been
provided.
No market data is provided to support parcel D or Parcel F.
The s Iue conclusion of$22,000 wn -nay or may not rep,-esent market value, Further analysis
opinion.
and u- �tauon by the appraiser would be required to enable this judgement, in my
Sincerely,
/ Gantt Waldner,
GR'1V,�w
1
l
M i
3s18a.- aoa.so
WASHINGTON APPRAISAL SERVICES, INC.
10232 N.E.101h STREET-BELLEVUE,WA 99 4269•(206)4531456
j4 The City of Renton
Public Works Department
�.W;. 200 Mill Avenue South
k• Renton, Washington 98055
Attn: Arlene Haight INVOICE
Re: RAMAC Street Vacation Humber 001-89
Number 3462
N.A.S. 90-nl8 Dare 3/5/9A
JOB NO. BALANCE
90-018 For Professiona`. Services Rendered:
Garrett W. Waldner, P[Al
2.25 Hours Q $90/Hour
TOTAL $202.50
i
CIIARTkRR tt4 LAWS OF IOU
CM OF RENTON CERT IF"TiON
Sb I.1 r as l^ab,wan vmprq a ..
!e ar�6.b. h..W 2 W we ,maven
o b.M pvtemst m f I.mh
e.M.0 r me mpraaeapb..phm W an a 1w.a
,.a aw 1.e.N4vf.M a^ .►•.aaom..a.maF b da asm
TERMS NET
1
I
1
IkNGMONTH
KTEPEST A '0THMF15 T THE E O PER MONT �11,y1p 1
CHANGED ON M.L^ERWE KC NTS d Jµ1
P"l
_�
sk r'-t i
� y4
w
t
L -
e3 y CITY OF RENTON
F
� Public Works Department
Earl Clymer, Mayor _-_ _ _ Lynn Guttalsss,Dheclor x'jss's`
at
d
t s
'Y
March 9, 1990 -
Mr. Charles M. Mattaini
Rea: istate Appraiser _
222 Williams Ave. So.
Renton, WA 98055
{ Re: Appraisal - RAMAC Street Vacation 001-89
Portion of Bronson %'ay North
Dear Mr. Matlaini:
After review of your appraisal, the City finds the following deficiencies:
i Under 'Correlation and Value Conclusions', page 4, there are several mathematical errgrs which,
while minor, should be cle,.ned up.
Parcel c
55%of fee value equals$9,1919, not S8,207.
Parcel D
Easement rights, 55%of fee value, equals $6.494, not $6,493
Parcel E:.
Unencumbered fee value, 5,333 square feet times $3.00 per square foot equals $IS 999,
not$8,800. Easement rights at 55% of fee value equals $9,900, n t 53%.
On page 6, the comparable sales are not identifiable based on the information provided. Further,
a much more specific analysis of each sale, comparing it to the subject property. is required.
i
No marker data is provided to support parcel D or parcel F.
In addition to the above, we ha e a cunt:.., .nth the derivation cf the easement rights at 55% of
fee value. The value numbers are not justified, please t ?vide substantiation.
Very truly ),,urs,
' Arlene Haight
Property Managem•:nt
a CJAs4xir
«. Dm Shane,RAMAC,Inc.
I
200 Mill Avenue South - Renton,Washington 98055 -(206)235-2631
� J
a
• I
Seattk ((�
Engiix'ering Departnxnt
Gary Zarh.v.Dneaor
a an B Rice Mayo,
June 26, 1990
Mr. Richard J. Anderson, P.E.
Utilities Manager
CITY OF RENTON
P. O. Box 626 - 100 S. 2nd St.
Renton, WA 98057
Re: Review of Mattaini Appraisal - Ramac Street vacation 001-89 �I
Portion of Bronson Way North
Dear Mr. Anderson:
As you requested, I have reviewed the Mattaini appraisal report
and, based on the materials delivered to me, I recommend
rejection of the report for the following reasons: j
1) The report is incomplete and lacks proper documentation.
The listed comparable sales can not be verified with the
seller, the buyer, or the broker since there are no names
- listed, no record-ing numbers cited, no addresses given and
no locational maps provided.
2) The conclusions for the impact of easement rights are
unfounded and inconclusive. The appraisal arbitrarily
allocates 10% to subsurface easements, 35% to surface
easements and 10% to overhead easements, Even if these
num;3ers could be substantiated, they would not apply to
the entire 60' width of the street right of way, only to
the actual width needed for City otmad utilities.
Since correspondence in the packet supplied to me indicated a
previous appraisal showing $10.00 per sq. ft. it is d:.fficult
for me to accept a $3.00 per sq. ft. value without either
i receiving sufficient market data from the appraiser, or without
! doing an independent market analysis.
Sincerrely, /
�- Joachim Pestinger, SR/WA
Property Services Supervisor
Attachments
o• Paper
. An r9wl menl onu.ly mrmalrve aUn r
SeanbEng�reennDeonmen� Rom910 $eamme Munvpl Bu,kg F9nn Avenue seatl e WA BI Oard79.f2 )6aW
+.rota
m a
r �
� •:Ta
APPRAISAL
QUALIFICATIONS S EXPERIENCE
JOACHIM PESTINGER, SR/WA t.4
EDUCATION
Associate of Arts Degree and Bachelor of Arts Degree, Briyham Young
University
EMPLOYMENT
Residential Appraiser, Crew Chief, Commercial Appraiser, and
Industrial Appraiser
County Assessor's office (q years)
j Right of Way Negotiator, Appraiser, Review Appraiser, and
Supervisor
I Clark county Public Works Department (7 years)
Property Services Supervisor
City of Seattle Engineering Department (9 years so far)
APPRAISAL COURSES TAKEN
TITLE:
Residential A SPONSOR:
Appraisal, Course #1 of Assessors State Association
commercial Appraisal, Course #3 x
x
Income Approach tc Real Estate Valuation
Association of International
Assessing Officers
Appraising Real Property, Course #101 Society of Real
Estate Appraisers
Income Property Appraising, Course #201 „
Narrative Report Writing Seminar
Mini-Math for Appraisers
„
Appraisal Review for Federal Aid Projects U. S. Department
of Transportation
Real Estate Acquisition. Seminar
Administration Federal Highway
Last Resort Housing „
Relocation T +yment Course
Appraisal Principles, Course #101 Association American Right of Way
Appraisal of Partial Acquisitions, Course #401 x x
_J
Appraisal Qualifications s Experience
Joachim Pestinger, page 2
CERTIFICATIONS
Real Property Assessment - Certificate #82 The State of
Washington
Residential Property Appraisal - Certificate #126
Department of Revenue Real (Commercial) Property Appraisal -
Certificate #66 « «
Industrial Property Appraisal - Certificate # 17
« n
COURT TESTINO
t
' Qualified as Expert Valuation Witness for Washington State Superior
Courts. Testified in Courts in Clark County and King County.
i
CERTIFIED APPRAISAL INSTRUCTOR
Instructor for the following appraisal courses sponsored by the
International Right of Way Association:
1
' #101 Principles of Real Estate Acquisition --Appraisal
i214 Skills of Expert Testimony
i401 The Appraisal of Partial Acquisitions
i402 Introduction to the Income Approach
#403 Easement Valuation
Also certified to teach Negotiations, Law, Engineering, and
Property Management courses.
Taught courses in cities in: Alaska, Califor;iia, Idaho, Montana,
Ohio, Oregon, Utah, Texas, and Washington. "aught in Canada in
Ottawa, Vancouver, B.C., and Yellowknife.
PROFESSIONAL DESIO!'AT30N
Senior Member of the international Right. of Way Association,
awarded the SR/WA designation.
OTHER MEMBERSHIPS
Candidate for the SRA and SRPA designation of the Society of Real
Estate Appraisers.
f
_J
3
' t
a�
ft, CITY OF RENTON
Department of Planning/Building/Public Works
Earl Clymer, Mayor Lynn Guttmann, Administrator
a
I
August 23, 1990
Mr. Dan Shane
RAMAC Incorporated
P. O. Box 653
Renton, WA 98057
SUBJECT: RAMAC STREET VA(A-or:No. 001-89
BRONSON WAY NOR',❑
Dear Mr. Shane:
It is the intent of this letter to inquire as to the status of the appraisal for the above
referenced Street Vacation.
It was determined in a June 26, 1990 appraisal review meeting with City officials and your
appraiser, Chuck Mattaini, that the original appraisal did not meet certain appraisal
standards per two(2)outside reviews by other appraisers.
At the close of the review meeting it was concluded that Mr. M;:tmini would revise his
appraisal to include substantiation and documentation for the values given. It has been
sixty (60) days since our June 26th meeting and sixteen (I6: morihs since the April 17,
1989 Public Hearing and we have not received a revised appraisal
If you wish to proceed wah the Street Vacation process, please declare your intention to do
so. If we do not hear from you within thirty (30) days or by September 28, 1990, Public
Works will recommend to Council that this Street Vacation be placed on file and no further
action will be taken by the City.
Very truly yours,
Aelene M. Haight �.
Property Management Supervisor
W-SSC.AMN:p
CC: Mr.Chula Matwni
222 with.Aeaaue South
Rent, WA MISS
iMvilrn J.Pete,.en,C,,r.ierk
{1
i
I
200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 -(206)235-2631
e
,y
yn
PUBLIC VJORKS DEPT,
RaMac, Inc. CITY OF RENTON
June 8, 1989
Ms. Lynn Guttman, public Works Dif
CITY OF RENTON
5-
200 MITI Ave.lue South
Renton, Washingt^o'PD55
RE. 9RIiNSONWAYST s£T kAGAT/ON
Dear Ms. Guttman.
,
I After contacting your department, We submitted the name of Chuck
Mattainl, who was approved by Mr. Don Monaghan as a qualified appr-
aiser
Mr 11attalnl should have the appraisal out In the next couple of weeks.
We nave paid the $250.00 processing fce as required oy ordinance and
nave Included a copy of our receipt.
,
If you have any further questions, please don't hesitate to call.
5 er ly,
Dan Shane
President
I1
I
05 and
I
cc Don Monaghan
1
i
i
1
RaMac, Inc. • P.U. Box 653, Renton, Washington W57 • (206)392-4199
L_ _i
Z
Engineering
1277.00(,218)
September 19, I989
City of Renton
200 Mill Avenue South
Renton, WA 99055
ATTENTION; MR. RON OLSEN, UTILITIES ENGINEER
s SUBJECT; COTTONWOOD LIFT STATION
TlUjgSMITTAL OF PRE-DESIGN REPORT
y
Dear Ron:
Enclosed are 15 copies of the Pre.Desi6m Report for the Cottonwood Lift Station for final
review and approval. We rcscommend that you distribute copies to the following persormel -
and agencies for comment:
1. Jack Crumley - Maintenance Superintendent
2. Gary Morrison - Sewer Maintenance
3. Community Development
4. Department of Ecology
5. Metro
In addition, we suggest that you meet with Dan Shane to negotiate a 50'x 30' easement
for the improvements.
Thank you for your consideration, p1case call if you require additional information.
n
zP E.
enclosures: 15 copies of Pre-Design Report
1410 Market:,reef, P.O. Box 1180. Kirkland,Washington 98033(206)827.6430