Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutWWP2701864 S-501 Heritage Forrest Apts. 1 BEGINNING OF FILE FILE TITLE ✓) A" of 1: .` ww' Im Tow 1 i { S. BUILDING DIVISION SECOND FINAL OCCUPANCY INSpFrTIOPd REPORT i 1 i DATE•_SEPTEMBER a 1990 TO: LMILITY SYSTEMS � [ J STORM - RANDALL PARSONS �`- `• ` ',� �V (t•!� SEWER - DAVE CHRISTENSEN w [ ] WATER - ABDOUL GAFOUR [ ] SONSTRUCTION V S YO Ng �' [ ] TRANSPORTA^TON SVCS - C � INT_ MORG�v ', [ j LANDSCAP ./ ONINq - - [ j�DILDING FINAT - Kow wrDAM [ J FIRE PREVENTION FROM:_BUILDING DIVISION SUBJECT:_4201 HE 5TH ST _PERMIT NO_1-15015rHRQIB_15019 TYPE. BUSINESS—APARTMENTS The subject project is nearing completion. Please investigate ur area of responsibility and indicate below either your acceptance or accaptence, non� It is necessary to return this form by SEPTEMB£R �4 1990 in order that a permanent Certificate of Ocupancy may be issued If no comments are c i received by the above date, the permanent certificate will be issued. TO: BUILDING DIVISION DATE l , FROM• 1 f icy—F � �� �� ��� i �ylo M This project is approved by this department subject to the following corrections: (Note: see see copy of 90 day requirements attached) I (1i Authors zed Signature 1 :. Gar y^ . `.., •,, '�. "a, .. � y w ,K. RECE:v Li+ fiwi DAe —V IMi11b.C1 '(St"ID IOr rlc O,ott 1 Ull Pallor Nriiopel Me Insurance Compsry w...:wsroe r,ru ow,uon Filed In, Record at Request of To l ilk ty{i�__ , 9 :01/34 40966 IR 'fFNT(1N M'INIPIPhI �(s RFCD F. 3.f10 TO STA AVE. SO. RFCFF.E :.00 CASHSL *4 N.?.00 - SS BILL OF SALE KNOW ALL MEN DV THESE PRESENTS: That Bennett Community Bldg., Inc, _ . of County of k In'v no ,State of Washington,the party of We first part. for and in consideration of the sun of One and TM---- ----------------------------- Dollars lawful money of the United States of America,to it in hand paid by the City of Renton In the Part of the second n. the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, does b these resents�7` P+ W P Y B Y D Brant. ' VLagain, sell and deliver unto the said pan y of the second part,the following dexribed?�"property now located at 4200 Block of N.E. 5th Street. in the City of Renton ,County of King and State of Washington, tD.wll: CD so 501 Atle a sewer manhole' ❑d all appurtenances pertaining to said sewer:oain, expressly warranting said sewermain against any expenses, costs, or liens hereto incurred thereon by, through or under seller herein. Including the wetwell and associated piping near the pump station west of the site. TO HAVE AN. TO HOLD the some to the said parts of the second p:n, its heirs, executors. administrators and assigns forevtr. And said part v of the first part, for its heirs, executon, administrators, covtnants and agree" to and with the said party of the second part, twutors, administrators and assigns, that said pant of the first part is the owner of the said property,goods and chattels and ha, good right and lull authority to sell the same, and that It will warrant and defend the sale hereby made unto the said parts of the wand part, i I, esecuton aJminisrraton and assigns, against all and every person or persons, whomsoever, lawfully claiming or to claim the mine, i IN WITNESS WHEREOF,The said pan of the first pan ha hereunto set hand and seal this day of /+ (sus) _(SUL) (ham) STATE OF WASHINGTON, (sus) 15a. County DI 1 On this day personally appeared before me ' to me known to be the individual described in and who executed the within and foregoing instrument. aed acknowledged that -/-s signed the mine as -I(,_ free and vDlunmry act and deed. for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. t GIVEN under my hand and official seal this ^2 5;C.f- day uI 4',Pc— Naraut�y Prrefk Ja rA<SUrx s)lyuliwpss, ��{©l��td�l8.S35,a0•`�9.ja1 -sdragu � r COST DATA AND INVENTORY SUBJECT: Heritage Forest C'TY PROJECT NUMBERS: W- 1 S_ NAME OF PROJEC TO: CITY OF RENTON FROM: Pacific Engineering UTILITIES DIVISION 200 MILL AVE. SO. 130 Andover Park E., Suite 300 RENTON WA 98055 Seattle, WA 98188 DATE: 5/3/90 i Per your request, the following information is furnished concerning costs for improve- ments installed for the above referenced project. WATER SYSTEM: Length Size Type L.F. OF WATERMAIN L.F. OF _ WATERMAIN L.F. OF " WATERMAIN _ L.F. OF " WATERMAIN EACH OF GATE VAL DES EACH OF " GATE VALVES EACH OF GATE VALVES i SUBTOTAL $_ EACH OF FIRE HYDRANT ASSEMBLIES f (COST OF FIRE HYDRANTS MUST BE LISTED SEPARATELY). TOTAL COST FOR WATER SYSTEM $ SANITARY SEVER SYSTEM: supplemental information furnished as requested for wet well s -- -- and manhole installed at Stati or 4+90 (5th). Length Size Type L.F. OF _ SEWER MAIN L.F. OF SEWER MAIN L.F. OF SEWER MAIN EACH OF '�y7__ IbINITEIE MANHOLES TOTAL COST FOR SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM S31.00O.00 STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEM: Length Size Type L.F. OF STORM LINE L.F. OF ___ STORM LINE L.F. OF STORM LINE _ L.F. OF _ STORM LINE TOTAL COST FOR STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEM $ 1 i STREET IMPROVEMENTS: (Including Curb, Gutter, Sidewalk) TOTAL COST FOR STREET IIVROVEII NTS �iflG (SIGNATORY MUST uE AUTHORIZED AGENT OR OWNER OF SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT) �amlV' ' - • r i an .tip+'�•.�: 1� � V „�yyywa, r _.----- iv_�rrx_ • p�/�`i.1a-f✓�J�eia�r�ls�Ylt�s,- - - � \ _.__-- i __. AS-/.SditT jlFF;dtu+•n/6I,� Sd�L�.f7s" f_'✓Clll_4fi�,Pre��l��-_ ----------------- ---- --------- --------- ----- .w Gary's Tale-scan .11o R.aa Sl,s..N..wA"In T.Y. Inspection and Repay Report IJPl1 t..a JOB NO. CLIENT - DATE DIRE CLEANED By WEATHER INSPECTOR LOCATION OF LINE T.P SECTION LENGTH - DIRECTION MEASURED Lw N _ JOINT LENGTH PIPE TYPE JOINT TYPE MANHOLE NO. MANHOLE NO PIPE SIZE µr ,µr I `J T.MI JOINT REMARKS JOINT REMARKS fmt.Qe SEALEO ' EO°Iw SEALED 1 REMARK$ d LINE CONDITION LEGEND CH.nI,,,en • -Broren Pip mnnonon L! M.nnolea P -Prc1uN PT -Prmmanp T.. R R.H 5 - X1—ulan J i i Oary's Tele.Scan T.V. Inspection and Repair Report } Yt05.tMM51..SiIK W Wlw IMI]M-lNE DATE JOB NO. CLIENT INSPECTOR PE CLEANED BY WEATHER PI y LOCATION OF LINE - Tnr SECTION LENGTH DIRECTION MEASURED LaW n�F MANHOLE NO. RIPE SIZE - JOINT I.ENOTN PIPE TYPE HINT ivRE MANHOLE NO. LV Dnolwn �R.1 h TravN i REMARKS FRo1R} I REMARKS $lT1CF0 SEALED }t ti REMARK' LINE CONDITION LEGEND �INnSnW a -BrRLM PWF LRy _- LI -LW InU111.11 G P. LE -LW E.1111N4U� Lyenoln P -PrtWrP No. Pf -0.a1ru1rN Tp R Rao 5 -Sh..e Lueo� U i^�.hMO�n TGf HNIC14N J J 44 Y f f' SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM LOW PRESSURE AIR TEST PROJECT f �P CTOR Dam, n,t r1. LOCATION LENGTH K C � RESULT - 1 rE _ l r _r Me e Al CITY Ge RENTON FN PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor Design/Utility Engineering i November 9, 1989 Todd R. Bennett Bennett Community Builders 11061 N.E. 2nd Sneer, Suite I I I Bellevue, N'A 98004 Subject: Heritage Forest Apartments Dear Mr. Bennett Upon review of the calculations provided by Pacific Engineering at the time of design, the existing wee well does not have sufficient capacity for a two-hour storage. To provide sewer service to this development, you will be required to install the additie let well as designed, or install gravity main to N.E. 4th Street. If you have any further questions, please contact me at 2i>-2631. Very truly yours, Michael A. Benoit Wastewater Engineering RERITFRS/MAB11 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton,Washington 98055 - (206)235-2631 FICSImna 1206)235-25 Lt I J LOOK ZEA `■ JSyr M'. r'1 a. Ii Y I ' l MINIM PRO , r� BENNETT COMMUNITY BUILDERS, INC. October 24, 1989 Ron Olsen City of Renton 200 Mill Street Renton, WA RE: Heritag'. Forest A 28 Unit Apartment Community Renton, WA Dear Ron: We are currently proceeding on the referenced project and feel we are on schedule at this point. During our contracting for the project, we have come across an issue we i would like vour reconsiderat4on of. During our plans review, the Public Works review indicated a potential need for a "Wet well" adjacent to the existing pump station on Union Street. We were not informed of a need for the facility when we completed our rezone and site plan approval in September 1988, despite a review of our plans by Public Works/Engineering at that time (copy of report to Hearing Examiner attached as Exhibit A) . When this issue arose during our plans review, we were concerned that objection to the Wet Well would delay our project into the rainy season and we were told that the Wet Well was just not that expensive of an item. Since that time, we have determined the cost of the Wet Well, which is very high, (approximately $20,000) . We have also reviewed the need for the Wet Well with the City of Renton Maintenance Department, our engineer and the City's engineer, and all question the need for it. We have been informed that the current lift station was installed 5-6 years ago and that it has two separate pumps, so that in an emergency situation, whereby cne pump p 11061 N.E.2nd St,Sum 111 •Bellevue.WA 98004• (206)646-8846• FAX(206)646-8856 _l w e Page 2 Ron ilsen October 24, 1989 failed, the second pump would be a backup. If both pumps failed, the City of Renton Maintenance Personnel felt that � . the current lift station had adequate storage capacity to _ accommodate sewage requirements in the area, until repairs could be made. Furthermore, we are aware of an area wide sewer moratorium in the area of our site. Accordingly, we have been told no more hookups will be permitted until the sewer system in the area is completly upgraded. We have also been told a system upgrade would involved abandonment of the very lift station that we are being required to install an expensive Wet Well next to. Ron, we would like to formally request reconsideration of the wet Well requirements on our project for the following reasons: 1.) We completed a rezone and site plan approval in September 1988. This approval involved circulation of our plans to all departments including Public Works/Engineering. If an expensive item like a Wet Well would be required, we feel we should have been notified P� this time, so we could reasonably anticipate this -ge item in on our project feasibility budgets. 2.) We have been informed by the City of Renton Maintenance Department, our engineer and the City's engineer that the need for a Wet Well is questionable. 3.) There is an area wide sewer moratorium in the area, and the City's plan in the near future is to abandon the Union Street lift station all together. It seems unreasonable for us to incur a major expense for a facility that has a questioned need, that will in all probability be abandor.ed in the near future. We strive very hard to provide affordable housing for city residents. Additions♦ costs such as this would have the net result of increasing our rental charges to prospective tenants, something we would prefer not to do. To facilitate our planning ani scheduling, we would appreciate a response from you by Friday, November 3rd if possible. wmmwmwYe'•" L J J Pegs 3 Ron Olsen October 24, 1989 If you have any questions or if further information is required, please let us know. Sincerely, i T d R. Bennett esident Enclosure TRB:jf\a:10827 cc: Kenneth Nyberg City of Renton Planning Department i 1 I J 3. 4 +eh: PUBLIC HEARING September 27, 1988 Page 1 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PS1kkI�.1lEA83NSe September 27, 1988 APPLICANT: Bennett Community Builders, Inc. -: FILE NUMBE7: ECF O18-88; R 018-88; SA 018-88 LOCATION: 4200 Block of N.E. 5th Street A. SUMMARY AND PURPOSE OF REQUEST: Applicant seeks to: 1) rezone approximately 1.22 acre subject { ' property from G-1, General Use, to R-], Medium Density Multi-Femiy Residential Use; and '2) obtain site plan appproval for development o- a 28 unit apartment complex to be celle9 Heritage Forest Apartments. B. GENERAL INFORNA'1'LON: 1. Owner of Record: Leslie Danner; Edwin Ferkingstad: Lirda Ferkingstad 2. Applicant: Bennett Community Builders, Inc. 1. Existing Zoning: General Use (G-1) 4. Existing Zoning in the Area: G-1, General Use; R-1, Single- Family Residential; R-2, Low r Density Multi-Family Residential; R-], Medium Density Multi-Femiy Residential; and B-1, Commercial. 5. Comprehensive Land Use Plan: Commercial Use 6. Size of Property: 1.22 acres 7. Access: N.E. 5th Strae't 8. Land Use: Property is presently developed with a residence and accessory structures. These structures will be demolished to facilitate the construct of the proposed ° Heritage Forest Apartment complex. 9. Neighborhood CharActeristics: North: Multi-family residential uses. I East: Undeveloped property; Multi-family residential uses. s South: Undeveloped property direc*ly to the south; commercial development to the southwest. West: Multi-family residential use. C. HISTORIC BACKGROUND: J Exhibit A � _J t w 1 BUILDING AND ZONING D"-_ARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO .E HEARING EXAMINER 1 Action 171" ordinance Date Annexation 2290 November 23, 1966 D. PUBLIC SERVICES: 1. Utilities a. Wes: The property is served by a six (6) inch line via N.E. 5th Street. b. Sewer: The property is served by an eight (8) inch line via N.E. Sth Street; an eight (8) inch line has also been installed from Union Avenue N.E. to the western boundary of the site, on the parcel due west of the subject property. c. Storyn Water. Drainage: 1 2. Fire Protection: Provided by the City of Renton as per ordinance requirements. 3. Trrnsit: METRO Route #114 serves the property from Union Avenue N.E. ; METRO Routes #107, t110 and #111 nerve the property via N.E. 4th Street. 4. Schools: i a. ElementarySc:ools: Honeydew Elementary School is approximately one-third mile north of the site. b. Middle_Schools: McKnight Middle School is approximately 1 3/4 mile northwest of the site. c. High Schools: Hazen High School is approximately one mile northeast of the site. 5. Recreation: Kiwanis Park is approximately one-half mile north of the subject property. Windsor Hills Park is approximately one mile west of the subject property. Maplewood Playground is - . approximately one mile south of the subject property. E. APPLICAf',E SECTIONS OF THE ZONING CODE: '_.. Section 4-704, General Use Zone 2. Section 4-709A, R-3 Residence Distract 3. Section 738, Site Plan Review 4. Section 4-3014(C) Hearing Examiner (Zoning Reclassification) F. APPLICAB _SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHE ALIVE PLAN OR OTHER OFFICIAk1 CITY DOCUM1=N t 1. Comprehensive Plan Compendium, March 1986, Policies Element IV - Residential, page* 14 - 16. 1. 2. Comprehensive Plan Compendium, March 1986, Area-Specific Policies - Northeast Rentun, pages 55 - 61. G. 11F�PsLR\IYfM NT ANALYSIS: 1. The applicant, Bennett Community Builders, Inc. , seeks: 1) approval to rezone a parcel of property approximately 1.22 acres in size, from G-1, General Use to R-3, Medium Density, Multi- Fdmily Residential Use; and 2) approval for a site plan for the construction of a 28 unit apartment complex. I This property is presently partially developed with a single- J family residence and accessory buildings. These structures would 1 Aw."ions r J } 1�1. BUILDING AND ZONING D" 4RTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO .t HEARING EXAMINEP. f need to be demolished to accommodate the proposed residential development. 2. Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and SERA (RCW 43.21[C), 1971, as amended) the Environmental Review Committee, the responsible official, issued a Determination of Non-Significance - Mitigated, on August 8, 1988. Mitigation conditions are listed as follows: a. That the applicant develop a design plan for open space, landscaping and screening which maximizes open epace/natural environment for both habitat enhancement and passive/active recreational opportunities for residents (adults and children) . Note: The Committee felt the applicant should consider an alternative site plan that orients some of the buildings to N.E. 5th Street, thereby reinforcing the existing streetscape and placing parking at the rear of the site as a puffer between the unite and commercial development to the south. { b. That the applicart limit construction operations to hours between 9:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. on Naturdays and that nQ ! construction operations occur on Sundays to mitigate noise 1 impacts. c. That the applicant be required to periodically wet down the construction site with water to limit dust and debris. d. That the applicant be required to wash down truck wheels with water prior to their leaving the site to minimize tracking of dirt onto the public right-of-way. e. That the applicant be required to provide a bond in the amount of $1,000.00 to ensure street clean-up during construction operations. 3. Various city Departments have reviewed and commented on the proposal. The majority of the staff reviewers recommended approval for the proposal with conditions. (See attached Etaff ( Comments) . Two comments which need to be addressed are as fellows: i a. The Traffic Engineers comments have been modified. The new conditions which the applicant will have to comply with are as follows: 1. The applicant shali be required to pay a trip generation fee of $404.80. 2. That the applicant provide street lighting plans. b. The Police DOp♦♦artment the applicant: 1) address the comiblex and 2) provide crime prevention hardware such as an slats system, lightin dead bolts. REZONE CRITERIA 4. Section 4-3014(C,l) of the Renton Municipal Code lists three criteria that the Hearing Examiner is asked to consider along with all other relevant informatlot in making a decision on a rezone application. a) That substantial ev enr as presented demysatratinc the puAect reclassification appears nott_to have been ; rt w , BUILDING AND ZONING D- ARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO X HEARING EXAMINER specifically considered at the time cf the_Iae-t area land use analysis and area xonina. The subject property has been designated G-1, General Use since the property was annexed into the City of Renton in November, 1966. Since that time the property has not been considered for a rezone. (b) That the Property is Potentially classified for the proposed zone bei_Dg_reguee_tad pursuart to tfia Policies set forth in the_Comprihonsiye Plan and. conditio o_bgve been met which would indicate the change is appropriate. The applicant's request does not conform to the Cit, 's Comprehensive Plan Map designation for the site which is Commercial Use Until December 1981, the Comprehensive Plan Map designated the site as multiple family. At that time the City Council adopted the Northeast Renton Plan which includes the subject site. In this this plan, properties in the immediate area of the site currently unrer consideration were designated either Commercial or Office/Office Park with the hope of creating an employment base for the surrounding residential area. Since the adoption of the Northeast Renton Plan, the City Council has approved rezones to R-1, Multiple Family in the immediate area even though the properties were shown as potentially suited for commercial or office/office park development. This has been a transitional area since the plan has shown the area suitable for multiple family, commercial and office park development. Many of ' these properties which have rezoned for multiple family use, nave been developed with multiple family projects. As stated in the Comprehensive Plan Compendium, the Comprehensive Plan is a guide for development which is not intended to be precise or dictate the future use of each parcel of property in the City. (c) That since the last Previous land use analysis of the Qree_ygnina of the subiect Property, auth_oized public i_mprov_ements. Permitted Private development or other gircumstaDges affecting the subject Property havo 11ndergon_9_ significant and matgrie1 change. Since the last land use analysis of the area zoning, properties in the immediate area have been developed with multiple family projects, N.E. 5th Street has been developed, the Super Safeway store has developed ea well as other commercial developments at the intersection of N.E. 4th Street and Union Avenue N.E. Water and sewer ere availagle to the site. Therefore, there have been c ircumstL6 ea which support coridideration of the rezone request to R-1, Multiple Family. ' S. The final test to datermine whether a rezone is appropriate is to address the question of timeliness; whether the 79zone of the subject property is appropriate at this time. Based upon the facts that the site is adequately served by public services; that the area has been determined to be better suited for multiple family development rather than commercial or office development; and the fact that the property is the last site to be rezoned in the immediate area, staff have determined that the rezone request is timely. SITE PLAN APPRQy81 CRITERIA J 04010ee0.�. I BUILDING AND ZONING D' 4RTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO ,F, HEARING EXAMINER r5. Section 4-738(D,1) of the Renton Municipal Code lists ten - criteria that the Hearing Examiner is asked to consider along with all other relevant information in making a decision on a Site Plan Approval application. These include the following: a. Conformance with the Comprehensiv-e-Plan, its ejements and oolicies; See discussion above under 4 (b) . The proposed site plan regv •gt meets the Comprehensive Plan policies regarding the ; cation of and development of Multiple Family Prole:ts. b. Conformance with existing Jgkuft use regulations: The applicant's proposal complies with the development regulations for the R-3 zone. The site plan is predicated on the applicant receiving approval of the rezone application. C. Mitigation,fipact to surrou d n roperties and uses: ' The project design is such that the applicant has attempted to minimize impacts to the surrounding properties by: 1.Installing a six (6) foot high fence around the property (Note: The applicant needs to be aware that tho six (6) foot fence will not be allowed along N.E. 5th Street. The fence may only be four (4) feet in height) . The fence needs to be asolid, sight- obscuring structure built or wood, brick or similar material. ; 2. orienting the development so that light and glare impacts on adjacent properties as a result of vehicles entering and leaving the site is minimized by shielding adjacent properties by the fence, landscaping and the location of the buildings; and 3. Designing the bulk and height of the buildings in a manner compatlable 3 with the adjacent projects. Adfiiiak d. Mitigation of impacts to the sit l_ The applicant's project has taken the site constraints me into consideration. The buildings are oriented in a manner which allows for adequate air and light; the buildings aro not clustered together but rather there is come open space between each building; the buildings are oriented, to the greatest extent possible, in a manner which reduces the units which will have direct views into other units; and the landscaping areas designed to minimize damage in the pedestrian and vehicular circulation areas on-site. Finally, in order to enhance the design of the project ( and impactd of views onto the parking, the applicantif should limit the use of carports on the Bite to only4the clustered parking stalls located in th- center of the parking area. No carports should be located adjacent the buildings. Any carports which are used should be designs,' to be architecturally compa' _ble with the exterior treatment of the buildings c.;d should be softened with landscaping. e. Conservation of area-wide property values; The subject proposal is not anticipated to adversely Impact surrounding property values and, in fact, hsould enhance those values. J I BUILDING AND ZONING U"hRTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO IE HEARING EXAMINER f. Safety pp efficiencv of vehicle and oedest,ian circulation; The applicant has worked with staff to revise their site plan to provide safe and efficient vehicle and pedestrian circulation given the site configuration. The applicant's current plan does not appear to show a connection between Buildings B, C and D. This is will then provide complete circulation between all the buildings on the site. g. Provision of adequate light .and airi The project has been designed to ensure that the proposed buildings as well as adjacent uses will have adequate light and air. h. fitigation pf—nois_e odors. and other harmful or unhealthy conditions) The construction phase of the project will result in some additional Noise and dust will in the area. The applicant has agreed to mitigation measures to attempt to minimize the impacts on the neighborhood (See attach4a conditions in Environmental Determination) Once construction is completed, the project will ddd an increment of noise to the area due to the introduction of new residents to the area. No odors or other harmful or unhealthy conditions are expected to be generated once the project is constructed. I. A_vallability ot-public servi.ces and facilities to accommodate the oroocsed us el an The site is adequately served by publice services. water and sewer lines are available to the site. Police and fire services are available to the site. The adjacent roadways are adequate to serve the project. J. Prevention_of neighborhood d—eterioratl2ri-nan1blight, The development will lead to the deterioration or blight of the neighborhood. H. DEPARTMENTAL EECOMMENDATION: Based upon the above analysis it is recommended that the Hearing Examiner: 1. Recommend to the City Council approval of the rezone request from R-3, Residential-Multiple Family to B-1, business Use. 2. Approve the site plan subject to the following conditions: a. That the applicant comply with the mitigation measures df the Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated issued for the rezone and site plan approval projects. b. That the applicant pay a trip generation fee $404.80 ($2.37 x 6.1 x 28 unita)prior to the issuance of a Building Permit. c. That the applicant work with the Police Department on hte appropriate types of crime prevention hardware to install in each of the units. d. That the applicant provide a walkway extention between Buildings B, C, and D. a J f BUILDING AND ZONING r 4RTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO iE HEARING EXAMINER e. That the applicant provide designs the fence to be a Solid, sight-obscuring structure built of wood, brick or similar material. ; f. That the applicant limit the use of carports on the site to only the clustered parking stalls located in the center of the parking area. No carports should be located adjacent the buildings. Note: The design of any carports used on the site should be designed to be architecturally compatible with the exterior treatment of the bui:" :ngs and should be softened with landscaping. I 1 i I F S Cw n. wTn r- r clp� i -T., . N 0 r 1-2 � rn II - I R3 BENNETT COMMUNITY BUILDERS, INC. HERITAGE FOREST APAPTMENTS R-018-88, SA-018-88, ECF-018-88 APPLICANT BENNETT COMMINtTY BUILDERS TOTAL AREA APPROX,.,_1.22 ACRES PRINCIPAL ACCESS N.E.'45th STREET 6 UNION AVENUE N.E. , EXISTING ZONING G-1 GENERAL USE EXISTING USE NONE - PROPOSED USE 28 UNIT APARTMENT COMPEX COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN MULTI-FAMILY COMMENTS LOCATED IN THE 4200 BLOCK OF N.E. 5th STREET, ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF N.E. 5th STREET AND EAST OF UNION AVENUE N.E. L CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST NO. : ECF-018-88 APPLICATION NO(S) : R-018-88, SA-018-88 PROPONENT: Bennett Community Builders DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Application to rezone approximately 1.22 acres of property from G-1, General Use, to R-1, Medium Density - Multi-Family Residential; and application for site plan approval to allow the development of a 28 unit apartment complex on said property to be called "Heritage Forest Apartments". LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 4200 Block of N.E. 5th Street, on the south side of N.E. 5th Street and east of Union Avenue N.E. LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton Building skid Zoning Department The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has determined that it does not have a probably significant adverse impact on the environmental. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 41.21C.010(2) (c) . Conditions were imposed as i mitigation measures by the Environmental Review Committee under their authority of Section 4-2822(D) Renton Municipal Code (see attached • sheet) . These conditions are necessary to mitigate environmental impacts identified during the environmental review process. This DNR is issued under WAC 197-11-140(2) . Because mitigation measures were applied, the lead agency will not act on this proposal for fifteen (15) days from August 0, 1988. Any interested party may submit written commnnts which must be submitted by 5:00 p.m. , August 23, 1988, in order to be considered. A fourteen (14) day appeal period will commence following the finalization of the DNS. Responsible Official; Environmental Review Committee c/o Don Erickson, Zoning Administrator Planning Division community Development Department 200 Mill Avenue South ton, WA 98055 PUBLICATIO14 DATE: August R, 1988 DATE OF DECISION: August ], 1988 SIGNATURES: 4 _ � Rona G. Nelson La1 Spring Jer Building OC[ici a Planning Manager f RicherdC. louyhton Public No a Director . q 3 °d Y, DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED MITIGATION MEASURES PROJECT: Bennett Community Builders Heritage Forest Apartments ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST: ECF-018-88, APPLICATION NUMBER: R-018-88, SA-018-88 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Application to rezone approximately 1.22 acres of property from G-1, General Use, to R-J, Medium Density - Multi-Family Residential; and application for site plan approval to allow the development of a 28 unit apartment complex on said property to be called "Heritage Forest Apartments." i LOCATION OF PROPOSA1,: ' Located in the 4200 block of N.E. 5th Street, on the south side o}y N.F.. 5th Street and east of Unidn Avenue N.E. DETERMINATION: The ERC issued a Determination of Non-Significance - Mitigated - for the proposed rezone and site plan on August ], 1988, with the following conditions: 1. That the applicant develop a design plan for open space, landscaping and screening which maximizes open space/natural environment for both habitat enhancement and passive/active recreational opportunities for residents (adults and children) . Note: The Committee felt the applicant should consider an alternative site plan that orients some of the buildings to N.E. 5th thereby reinforcing the existing streetacaoe and placing - parking at the rear of the site as a buffer between the units and commercial development to the south. 2. That the applicant limit construction operations to hours between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m. on Saturdays and that no construction operations occur on Sundays to mitigate noise impacts. 7. That the applicant be required to periodically wet down the construction site with water to limit dust and debris. 4. That the applicant be required to wash down truck wheels with water prior to their leaving the site to minimize tracking of dirt onto the publiL right-of-way. 5. That the applicant be required to provide a bond in the amount of $1,000 to ensure street clean-up during construction operations. PTHER: r In addition, the applicant is advised to provide a soils report which confirms the suitability of the site for the proposed infill and development, subject to approval by the City. J l_. J i [ « �' k/yp'/tmpr�,p-'rjwAl? �.�' ky �i� �} +� � �a•♦`,r{� ,,,r� � � i I III ..._._ REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIV1' IN: APPROVED APPROVED WITH COND TIONS NOT APPROVED 01 f ccef-Cr R1Eot-1V.X 70 R-3 . c4j oe ':j' CV10111 CY� G6t1, 113(AA1LX 103114, 1146 Pl2(7.�n1`I l�lP.1" I::i f?t'I:S..IIR50 1\WIVt< n� ��TU �� T116 5116 i L1*1 '1 1_NvA)SC /1111 '' fl.fllU II_Uu5('RA1C Z- 3 F-Vd 6) RJ X IIU(' W 1 11C" F11co1 (Ii1Ct7 ( N.%. gtJS�RC � IS L111H1Cp TO N 1406111 E.{- 4 I1:6( I I' '1iW fCnv�- kE IfC�vg Ntti sNulAr.� ON7U6 1.1\AITI,�( 1�INn;4, hIIW ) , ( SIGNATURE 0 IRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION a/rasa rorVi 1S7 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION:, APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVEi tlrN1E�Af►AaeAE 3SY�aIEGI ri1.1 j (Ail CnM[r C0[(AIEIII—I.'..':1_--" UI!CNlFlli AGIFCMENt•of".7 � flSlaI GEmorRFNI CIIAI.F ,,.//SLA 00• SAIDA eETEEerpni CIGAA/E IRLR �/ �, 3." •'1 f / ON SMIAE ASSESSMENT AREA CI.1ft-PA1r.R StCCIAI ASSESSRERI M.FN Clf d!'4-SfCIER I I �I 1 ' 1 lrrACYFe N'AlfA run IKrs'h (! ' I •rre3"fR SERIR fVN �. .�I11 111' .r A►fLsAD tilt IRGNN:i DATE: SIGNATURE OF DIRE OR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE RcvlatoN s/vs: form E82 i REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISIOM: : RUYED rVI APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVF7 �rh�i�✓ .wl 7�s^" Jr,�«//� f�P� /� 6G./�I�J�LPri+e�YJ� Qu//Gl��' /� f � �'®•�/Gf OP /hOve'(� �a'/N- 7 e""e!'' 4 / r,6c fl,,t �� wd�la�r k die afr.�sl O�BrJ f/DUI P as 4i�e aa•. �/.r�� a.�.,,/7� !/✓G a'J 4ele0 ATE K A ' JJ 1 }r 1 r r A, 1. T F._OF : c1oR OR M!NrnCIT 1 1 .,t'l . .,, ............---M-•-- tL 104114b OLVAItINLIII/I)IVI;.' III: I + ' 1 r' I.� �. /� " (��1.iy /;ll iri APPROVED FIAtli ROVED WITII CONDITIONS IY"1 NOT APPROVED %A, oat .t .. crti.. ..r a taf�. tl1. c+l n a 1'T`r`r'"""t rw..l. {„ .....�P..�" eia+.�.tiL" l...l. .�-(.Ls,,t ewA..,,....aA.a..,.afl.-...L..t.✓ SIGNATURDIRECTOR OR AU1 RIZED REPRESENTATIVEATE; /1 -dTf REVISION 5/19e2 CONIENIS: , Fnrm lag •)� �; T/<i91Yf/�'�Ner/sf ,z.(e .47/d i�itUef e �41r5 �Lf./i.Vt eo".AIfY //I:/f L` /•'it v�a)rC•t s.+a` i.'J r' 7 .`ir'/r 4 , We have 1 Sewed this nppliratlon with palllrular Rilentlon to those areas we have expertise in and l,nve ldenllrled pleas or probable impart or areas where additional 1 rorleallon leineeded to properly assess this proposal. + Slpwturo or Olreclor ar Authorized Represenlative Bala roan 4 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: 1 \�APPROVED APPROVED WITN CONDITIONS I NOT APPROVED a 1> 1/ YN.�e4. L L x Sv� o .�,71.1,.-� e...-+�. �...._ ...��_ �i✓ �•,(��•-y jK 1 3� �-+^..�Zf /�ry.�r•--�Qae� �SE:e.._ � pvt rzQt.e.......a�`'¢` emu....- ;EVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION; I� APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED Fly development and/or construction shall comply with current Fire and Building Codes and Ordi- Inces. second means Of approved access is required. Fire Department access roadsnanes shall be paved inlmum width 20% minimum height 13' 6". Yes No eliminary fire flow calculations show a lire flow of ,t7SO require hydrants with a minimum flow of_- ia>Dp —is required. gpm each imar hydrant Is required to be within__ /Tp 'convary,hydrants are required to be within 3o feet of the Structure. vcture. —�—_ leet of the I approved automatic sprinkler system is required to protect the total structure. Yes— No•= fire department access roads ale to be paved and installed prior to consnuction. Yes✓No_ lire hydrants are required to be installed and approved prior to conelruct'on. Yea, No, [GNATURE O�CTOR OR AUT110RIZED REPRESENTATIVEATE: REVISION 5/1ee2 -- Form 182 , EVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION; i_C_j) APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS El NOT APPROVED , . JN I40 ..vi ! rJ , !"ll1 Nye 1 r/o U'".•:,t l 'rn ).t L/...w >. fG14egr�o _. r''y of UfI F I Y t fp JUN 3;r19i1f2 BIJL 7C-UN6hrrI ;A& l 'IGNATURE OFF IRECTOR,OR AUTIIOR Z D REPRESENTATIVE DATE: `i REVISION e/1SS2 Form 102 EVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION; „tl�h�f,c k a APPROVED APPROVFd WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED 91. - - - i FATE. MATURE OF C1 ON,A11Ir1^r 7j !• r I it •� J 1 Scale 1"22000' f ' 1 • 1 1 • ( I n:• nn • x —A . . . M. 11 r y111 f F tl Ifs 1 It �� rr r�nT p�r 1 •3 yrd•(. Tf!(n LAND USE ELEMENT Single Family ® Commercial cc) r� Low Multi-Fa Density mily E r �' u Office/ Office Park vtnn Medium Densit {;, 1 I Ji Multi-Fam�y Public/Ouasi-Public .J High Density Multi-Family 1-19ht Industrial F Recreation '.'.'. Heavy Industrial �yJ Greenbelt Manulacturinq Park °°°tA o ) '��"' •��. \. l� J n RENTON —UILDING & ZONING DEPART SENT I DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEVII� ✓ ET2J ��`® l I' � �988 I 7 ECF - U18 _ 88 �O�T'�Dept APPLICATION NOW: RLZONE: K-018-88, SITE PLAN APPRLVAL: SA-018-88 PROPONENT: BENNFTT COMMUNITY BUILDLRS, INC. PROJECT TITLE: HERITAGE p,FOREST APARTMENTS BRIE FGDI TORRP!IONAND APPLICATION F. APPLICATION TO REZONE APPROXIMATELY 1.22 ACRES OF PROPERTY FROUNIT APARTMENT COMPLEX ON SAID PROPERTY TO BE CALLED: "HERITAGE FOREST APARTMENTS" LOCATION: LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF N.E. 5th STREET AT THE 4200 BLOCK. TO: u PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: j UTILITIES ENG, DIVISION _ FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT BUILDING B ZONING DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING, PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING $ ZONING DEPARTMENT ( BY 5:00 P,M, ON JULY 12, 1988 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: 1/1'1C �\APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED �) ✓ rdV"c�L Lz. X sv 0��"1�{. r.--� r•— '�-.-t.G-_. d-sy �' / or 7 ti) vvd c,. Yea SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR DATE:_ THO IZED REPRESENTATIVE - i aevIsion snasa L £LAN REVIEW ROUTIN c•To APPLICANT: _ DATE: _ JOB ADDRESS. NATURE OF WORE:: TO: Comments Due CO�.ments Due I `I ENGINEERING DIVISION I�I FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU__ TRAFFIC ENG.DSVISI0,1 I_I BUILDING CODE REVIEW _ UTILITIES ENG.DIVISION I__I ZONING i PARKING 1-I OTHERS I_I ENERGY CODE Comments or suggestions regarding this application should be provided in writing. Please provide comments to the Building Division b above data. n :QO .m. on REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION I_I APPROVED---__IAPPROVED WITH CONDITION JJ IS NOT APPROVED / C �cCBry.a 06�171190 77 /14 Signatupa— ra Of D rector or Autho zed Representat ve DATE/ / �., 0183 M i PLAN REVIEW ROUTING SLIP 1 DATE: APPLICANT:—i®-{"AQUE �lr_o IT kk - to Pa c-r a PQ FTIK ' K - C JOB ADDRESS:_ LJ LZg I ,1) t•d 1 NATURE OF WORK: R J, 10 F1 C TO: Comments Due Comments Due 1 �I ENGINEERING DIVISION L/-�/ 1`I FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU__ TRAFFIC ENG.DIVISION I`I BUILDING CODE REVIEW I_1 UTILITIES ENG.DIVISION 1_1 ZONING i PARKING I_I OTHERS I1 ENERGY CODE Comments or suggestions regarding this application should be provided in writing. Please provide comments to the Building Division by 5:00 p.m. on above date. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION 1_1 APPROVED 1__1 APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS 1 -ROT APPROVED r, m�- 40, Jgt&�� .0/W , 6 gna ure o rector Aut or zed Representative DATE #183 A [g CIIFIC Nrf21l7aLsr ` 3� �C�NOINEERINO — COMPANY CIVIL ■NOIN��;d AND IJp 1LI. fib_—o.n•�Mf MANNINO CON�ULTANTI wewaeom Pvr1PIry RAC= Of7rr:ZM,r N-nch _ I. A�S,c%Mr 10O ('kL/P,c. l?D AvL r-Low 4 Pr2son�wnrr. C WzAlL FLOW - _'4>< AVh. (,( . - 10 MIN. 3ETIO-51r:r41. f'VMP C/Glrrs ._- . ... __ .. 4. 2 H2 3AW-i�> On AVh FLAW. pku . r--LOW 4x ¢YI00Y46/24 = 60 51,1 bPM A43uwi r 'Z- 100 bPM # 470 5}L. (vl IYS 2 . Hft Stof2M�f .ChvL t a�� boox kx4G/z4)�Z) .- (:.XIS71I'Ib (2os �,31v(Ggtr!'a GAOALR^7 of-_ 4G6,7 .bAL A2 GF . T2-f 50, T-AZ _ ZrjU kn,T VvP,,LL CI5.I crAr--) jr 8.0' orrP = I27.2 or STof&wlrr +_L nfrw 54" = 1 z 7.z 21 G c r- TVTM—. PWA 0$0 Wi4T V*LL VC&V/wf_, - 7-RAM. Hk H 10. Uw. .rt,F,vArno-t -. + , 54 5 47.0 (,A L 980 baL 7MrAL 4�5° = 433. Ural `, ' � T�- RATrDD f-VI P f7r,Llvey2Y Ity l,fM- ". 100-UPA 61 PVMP) - — �/= STofZ4Ut-z (5�7wr�rl HILH +LCW cj9Q b4L. 6GO7}i AHS) Cy = _IhiFLOJy 'IU WfT V�%r�Ll. IH bCM 51. VPM CMAx) _ -- t .- TmM -nmr (Y=-rwr-.rn Pvmc- srnrzzS = \!- t qqo 25.8 Mlrt LrAnnr_LF_vFt Gi=- ID-a- Ge IX-51 S! FLark-rs. ljmt-iNlr-iL r0. _'--- Tklsnnb -A f W(SuL WAS Gf'r-rZk"I` r--rCif Cl Zc"41 i 304 Male Are Soum fdanbn.vjo root n osm _ __ A 2A ., SI#Afl.. AUX.FLw• At 1xA4XU/24v6D• ,ft{.i7 FiF/Nw 4 45d 8/ A7D 2,/.w CC3[NAI6I YILOCIfy °ice CON[ FOC qll/ATUA PD IE. IKE7- 36/•05 w.t•^S� INES Av. FLOW SWAFE+• (iO0 AI A0/t4Y 2) . COo ML 7Cy 44*4 P91 WFLC W/40'CNAAAVEL C 1o.21 AV) 46*o . IZ57 C.I./FT DVS 7D CNAMNI( (. fir SI OF WET wcL NAs CApw.ry CF- 6'I6AC, . DO PFOMD FMV STOFAGF CA(,S C/• Z'♦ am/n.i7• B.3L' SE7 &1`70M NCT WELL 8.36 • 6ELw INLET E.I . sam-6.34. 375.45 60TTOH OF SUCI1 PIPE S7S46r,50= 375.95 57ATIC UFI• VEIT OIST Ld TO W.: o Pone NC. IL.L •OFF• - 37S.4s 4I.;o. 374.9S 31ATIC LIF)• 3441 I.O- 3744S. I&Or rs 20 JIPNU.ED,p[ 7074L 11WA 11 NEAD C7DM) : IWIL+ PIPE FCx J1 NE6(EC7 i1, Nl 3910 . loo Ilv pXI•V<DAI 37s.Is P:, I I'/W* (.NN CHMT) ( ,J,•7_ L Iw• 2E4 F /6.♦3�Jl.2s Y%.7S IS CS FITTIN65 � �'• t TFI ") •2 a. 22 391.• X CNECC 144AE111-27. V -37s 90 ECI0w p). 11.4' 10 I'os 4S'&wm (4)v So 200 4'RU6 VANE C. To, /0 N0= 3YL VIC:: 4.EL' 34t.SS TON• /5 .OS f OdG 79.9I' J5 25 rulw sMt0 �c CVCCE T/HE • 10"IN 7 M7 sTT/NIN ' P14L 1( U Ir AV4 FL- 379.05 Zs..70FP V& IO H.N d• L4.7o/17.s7• 21L' SFF 4•or: J oft IV Am l� J 4 i A," a T �l i y yy WkOEngineering 1282 14'(.184) Mr. Jim Hanson Building Department City of minion 3555 NE tad Strec Renton, WA 98056 Subject: Heritr a re Forst Apartments Saw,ruratodum Exemption. Dear Mr. Ham on: This letter is to confirm our cm:versation on July 28, 1989 regarding sewer capacity for the Heritage Forrest Apartrnants. During development of the sewer moratorium designation for the South Highlar.& Area of the City of Renton, The Bennett group had alread- notified for the building permit for the Heritage Forrest Apartments. Since the basis for seniority as outlined in th.: moratorium is based on application date for building permits, we considered Heritee Furreat Apartments as existing when we determined the remaining capacity in the sewer system. The other projects listed in the moratorium had not Tot applied for building permrrs, but were given priority over the remaining 125 EDU s, therefore, wastewater B, •,a from the Heritage Forrest Apartment development have already been considered and will nct reduce the 125 EDU number. If you have say questions, or need additional information, please contact me at 453-0241. Sincerely, RH2 Engineering, P.S. Mark L Semrau, P.E. cc: Lynn Guttman, City of Renton Ron Olsen, City of Renton Todd Bennett, Bennett Group Incorporated 1410 Market Street,P.O.Box 1180, Kirkland,Washington 98C33(206)8276400 a y, _ r-x' , ' :.. .�_. _ _ _ �r ,`� ' +'`'yam 1•�. s ai l� .� cwm"0 CaSam neeala STATE OF WA14INGT()N DEPARTMENT CIF ECOLOGY 1 435(Y1501h AW NJ a R1NrvN "',ShVWq W62-5911 • (rW abl%'VV JUL 3 1 1989 Ms. Lynn Guttmann, Director RECENEo% Department of Public Works PV81'r WORKS 0 PT, City of Renton Cln Or RENTON 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98u55 Heritage Forest Apartments Sanitary Sewer Plans and Profiles Ecology Project No. NW 89-180 Dear Ms. Guttmann: In accordance with RCW 90.48.110 and WAC 173-240-010 through 180 of the Department of Ecology, the plans and specifications for this project have been reviewed and are hereby appro.ed. Within thirty (30) days follc ing acceptance by the owner of the above project or portions hereof, the enclosed Declaration of Construction m, t be completed and signed by the responsible professional :yineer for the project and returned to this department. Nothing in this approval shall be construed as satisfying other applicable federal, state or local statutes, ordinances or regulations. For additional information, please contact Mr. Robert J. Sylvester, Technical Operations Engineer, at the adiress above or telephone (206) 867-7080. Sincerely, 7. Stewart A. Messman, P.E. Technical Operations Supervisor SAM:RJS:sw Enclosure cc: Greg Diener - Pacific Engineering Company Richard Sandaas - Technical Services, METRO Seattle - King County Health Department L_ 1 i cAmof ANIFIL-- APPENDIX C AIEM ECLARATION OF CONSTRUCTION OF WADTER POLLUTION CONTROL FACILITIES iRVTMm-rlONS1 rtlons thereof, a professional A. U cnaPletlnn, and prior to me me of vnY protectha or ee lets and sign this fora declaring vpv, re iaterai in the Stare of Washington, shall coaq nfi,stion., And aajor ngtnelr, g lane and apse that the project vas constrvcie0 ta[taantdoi!Ecology- change orders, approved by the Dew c leted in Dhows.d eondate ion, a Ina shall M attached showing that n. Ifs prolecc is bete being n below. Each phase of a prolecc awt port{an of the project being declared o.+ the date Rt he d'- ofC as it is coapleted. Additional declaration fovea ate available fr<a the wportaent of Ecology offices listed below• ified in any wov. c, Thie dccluatton a+at be signed as presented and shall net 0< and OP PR ��_7 NAM An eR1FF DESLOlIPnON OJECT Heritag e Forest Apartments i ECOLOGY PROJECT No. 89-180 KIM OF OW"M City of Renton 0= pROJECT on 200 Mill Avenue South pgg8g CDmn"'D ADDRESS Washington 98055 ew oc nAN ""D l 1989 Renton -- — y'PEcnncAnoh JUL t_. tare P gppWVAL DATE y 41 y ro etc engLrter of the shwa idencifled protect add that said 1 he•en declare that l a ens v 1 pro jest was reviewed and obaecvad by r or aY authorised agent in eclare c &into a danceduality anauran<e plan approved by the Depart" of Ecology. I further declare coat said project was, to the near of ay knowledge and taforaation, <onstrocted end soap the Detartaent of witl, chc plans ann epecifil.01ns Snda�lot Wtlt"a Plan r0erf approved by p ° Ecoley and as shown -M the owner —"$lg,ueure o. ro ass o,e .ieei SUL OF gECISTEm WASgL=00 STATE ENCINBLR L� t o[ Feplop office cnecked below. Please return coapleted fora to the Departaen Central nt of Ecology Office Southwest Regional Offltt psp.rtaenc of 8rology Departsianc of Ecology 3101 Wsst Washington TTT1 ,s, Washington,Lane 98504-6111 Yak1Y, Waahieton 9890)-1164 Olvapia, Wahington Eutem gesional Office 'L Northwest Regional Office Deparewnt of Ecology Departaent of EC9Iogy N. 4601 Monroe, Suite 1DO +y 4350 - 150th Avenue N,E Epgkane, Washington 99105-1295 Red•m,d, .M nehingto 98052-5301 Departeent of Ecology - Headquarters Mall stop PY-ll ulyapns, Washingtpn 98504-8711 IyI[ tp fJ.°-t-2RI e1 t . I .............. L_ '+ '' P , f 41 RECEIIfEDi/yir S'S PUBLIC ✓ � O REN � ��.,�A, ;.Ww CITY OF REWTONON Si ATF c>f WkYVv,T(W DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY 4350-15ph.bw V f • Rev K f tl, mWrao %NA2 5 XA a (3A4)M-"M JUL 2 3 1989 Ms. Lynn Guttmann, Director Department of Public Works City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washingto,, 98055 Her'cage Forest Apartments Sanitary Sewer Plans and Profiles Ecology Proiect No. MW 69-180 Dear Ms. Guttmann: This submittal was reviewed for compliance with the Department of Ecology de3ign criteria and applicable state regulations and found to be acceptable. To expedite the project schedule I gave verbal approval to proceed with construction to Dave Christenson, by telephone on July 26, 1989. The formal approval letter and one set of stamped plans will be sent under separate cover. 1 if yn- have any questions or wish to discuss any aspects of this prcject in more detail, please telephone me at (206) 867-7080. Sincerel , Robert J. Sylvester, P.E. Technical Operations Engineer RJS:sw cc: Greg Diener - Pacific Engineering Company