The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutWWP2701901(5) S. Tobin St. Sanitary Sewer Correspondence 72 l+ BEGINNING OF FILE FILE TITLE •wdlw.r�. . wrewr� Y _ rro�.4i�p �nuan.. rw rep °�rrw+r _ yy�� a i � / m' 1pTNl 7 1 _..•14M� r � Q"""Ac, Q� G 41KIlNJ � [� O wr,r.n a MIN t •�.aas Nxwu,,,�� ..ate ro aim.■,,M s MEMORANDUM TO i A FROM SIIBJE(-i At I I .� N VI i 4A � �tMal R t � � • q1U,. Q ) AIRPC .L, � �. . � . y t I lug 6147 [a, z.* �./� / , J' «'' v •,r J as •I 1 a sr4tt anv tYwcr ? WC IQl?:ta q^'1+113T J7$r�� . 'a♦ SIIR[ Yp;f Nn ,�,d'Il WSi IT(p$ r0 Yf \ o WtpRyll. CIfaMEM. .I ♦ Itr1 • t f �. bAY11NGTON Na 1 �� • 11133 fJ>', , ay plpc��G145 Co~ � JI I tl 7t1�- \ 1 \1 \ 1 _ \J I 'N►i N Y3 I W a Y_ ♦ ' I If il, r.t '� a ��' ✓�'�,�e)�5 / - ! 2 rwr. nnf t 4:, I to � � �,..,.,�,. .. c i "' I, s . •q�' � V 0 lea w• all N F 1 �61 6 API R. A. Davis booth Gardner ;g y� • :, x (bverdx ter"'�'x sT�lt a N�k►^dd'xc DJARTMENT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRIES GenNi'1JrxmfrNxN dddMp • fMrryvx tta.hrg,nn VYGvt 3uly 2, 1985 PUCLIC VYQM($ P City of Renton CITY OFJJEW1 200 Mill Avenue S Renton, WA 98055 Ret Firm No. 189,339-00-3 Contract No. CAG-037-84 Gentlemen Please be advised that the Department of Labor and Industries does hereby release the City of Renton from any further liability pursuant to RCW 51.12.050 and RCW 51.12.070 as would otherwise incur in connection with a contract calling for sewer construction. This certificate does not release Ford Construction Company from liability for addit'onal contributions which later may be determined to be due with respect to the above mentioned contract or any other contracts said contractor may have performed. Very truly yours, Kaye K(orlaug k Administrative Assistant Contractor Compliance Unit Phones (206) 753-4398 ecul.KK.sam.2.23 cc to Ford Construction Company P.O.Box 6289 Federal Way WA 9800 J ' M ill V, MOO 1"8 Ppm 1BI I,JWY Ip!} N RETURN R[COIPT ~- i ��Ti Nam! City of Renton April 19, 1985 Page 1 In addition, the following items will be resolved: 1. Rewoval of stuck plug in line, and din infiltration caused by Colf Landycapir;, to be performed by us or others at the expense or e:he Citi. 1. Any plugs remainir, at the request of the Cl. y, will be charged at $250.00 each. J. Negotiation to pr..,,atl on the McGerry claim, with Ford Construction, , Corroon, $lack a : wson, and City of Renton involved in any negor fats MS. C. Dismissal of tho charge by the City, for repairs to the 11m water main. 5. City to acknowledge saeisfaetory performance of contract, and release Ford matructior Co. from any claims regarding pertormance and from any lairs tar delay, except as to tx McCerry matter, which shall r"win ope,i rot det.ermiratinn of the respective liability, if any, 00 thr parties. 6, City .r .r,inowledge that the kor,indtice of this t.ntrarr 1, tot its' ccn, nience, no to its .Josue to ctmtbtne work under this contract with another project. Attar completion and agreement M the above items, Ford CmstrwCtim Co. w122 be releamrd from the contr.et No. CAC 037-84, excepting any warranties or future obligations that are required under the specifications. Sincerely, CON.�MRLCTION CO. le L. Ford CLF;irj EANp pUNNNEO this +uth day of April, 1985. ovi Loucks a Lamb, Attorneys at Law 820 Logan Building Seattle, Fashinyton 9d L'1 Y�l A-kAj'r FORD CONSTRUCT/ON CO. GENERAL ENGMEERING CONTRACTOR P.O. BOA' 6289 a FEDERAL MAY. WASHINGTON 9R063 BUS. R06f 838.802C April 29, 1985 City of Renton Depart"nt of Public works 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington g6055 Attention: Sob 6ergstrom South 70bin Street Sanitary Sewer, Contract 0 GC 037-86 Dear Sob? Pnrd Construction Co, requests that final closure of the above referenced contract be made subjoct to the following conditions: 1. Payment to be made on retained amount of $2,711,90, in ts'il. 2. Sales tax on material m hand, paid 12/JI84, be paid ian J. City to take possession and make paymarrt tor, 10 15. 7f o- toes • 361.00 each, plus tax - $724.21. <. An additlmal 7511 of mobilization to be paid toy demobilisation Last fall. 5. A portion �f finish and clean-up, .n the amount of $10o.0o to be paid tot wort: performed. The following items will be performed, under the appropriate bid irems: 1. As-stilt of pipir:g Installed, paid as a portion of the construction staking item - $100.00. 2. T.V, inspection of 250 1.1. of installed line 6 $.80 per foot - $200.00. FORD CONSTRUCT/ON CO. GENERA! ENGINEERING CONTRACTOR P.O. BOX 6289 a FEDERAL B'AV. BASHINGTON 98063 BUS. (106)M-8M April 29, 1905 City of Penton Department of Public Works 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 Attention: Bob Bergstrom -E: South Tobin Street Sanitary .Sewer, Contract N CAO 037-80 Dear eob7 Furl Construction Co. requests that final cY, z rt -h.- a; .v . re. > 1 contract be made subject to the fotJwing a .:,. ;, ^s- 1. ryment to be made on retained amount of $2,711.90, in full. 2. Sales tdx on material on hand, paid 1113180, be paid or $6,505.70 0 8.1% - $526.96. 3. City to take possession and make payment for, 10 15• X 6- tees 0 $67.00 each, plus tax - $724.77. 1. An additional 25+ of mobilization, to be paid for de-mobi'.zatiue last fall. 5. A portion f finish and clean-up, in the amount of $lo0.o0 to be Paid for work performed. The following items will be performed, under the appropriate bid items. 1. As-Built of piping instilled, paid as a portion of the• construction staking item - $100.00. .. C.P. inspection of 750 l.f. of installed line 0 $.80 per foot $200.00. City of Renton April 29, 1985 Page 7 In addition, the following items will be re. olved: 1. Removal of stuck plug in line. and Litt infiltration caused by Calf Landscaping, to be performed by us or others at the expense of the City. 7. Any plugs remaining at the request of the City, will be charged at $250.00 each, 3. Ne9etiation to pro eed on the MCGerry claim, with Ford Construction, .,� Corroon, Black i Dawson, and City of Renton involved in any negotiations. y 4. Dismissal of the charge by the City, for repairs to the 11• water main. 5. City to acknowledge aatisfectory performanee of contract, and release Ford Construction Co. from any claims regarding performance and from any claims for delay, exMpt as to the McCerry matter, which shall remain open for determinati<m of the respective liability, if Soy, of the parties. i pity to acknowledge that the termination of this contract is for •ts' convenience. Owe-to its desire to combine work under this contract with another project. Atter completion and agreement .m the above items, Ford Construction Co. will Je relearn) from the contract No. CAG 037-84, excepting any warranties or future abligat Is that are requited under the specifications. Sincerely, FORA. CONN557Rf,UCC/TwIIJ�ONN CO. f aflir L. Ford CLF:irl HAND DELIVERED this 30th day of April, 1985. cc: Loucks a Lamb, Attorneys at Law 820 Logan Ruildinq Seattle, Washington 98101 OF RA, � T z PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT RICHARD C HOUGHTON • DIRLOTOR ['D 1R MUNICIP/ BU14'NG 200 MILL AVE.SO. RENTON.WASH.98046 A e 206 235-2569 119, ?Ea SEPtee�P BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH September 4, 19B4 MAYOR Ford Construction Co. P. 0. Box 5036 Kent, WA 98064 SUBJECT: South Tobin St, Sanitary Sewer, Work Progress Gentleman: This letter is to serve notice that this office is not Satisfied with the progress. or the method of prosecution of the referenced contract. In accordance with the contract specifications It is the contractor's responsibility to provide sufficient manpower and equipment to perform the work in a safe and professional manner within the time stipulated in the contract. It is apparent from the work so far that the proper equip- ment and sufficient manpower are not being utilized. The excess time to make the inilial tie-in to the Metro trunkline is resulting in Increased costs and inconvenience to the City as well as creating a safety hazard to the public. This office has rerelved complaints from McGarry Plumbing about broken sewer services, broken electrical services and loss of business due to your operation. They also complained of not being notified In advance of construction. Henceforth you will be expected to perform all work in accordance with the specifications and to pursue the completion of the project within the contract time limit. All orders issued by the City Inspector shell be carried out as soon as possible. Any deviation from the specifications shall be duly noted and a correction notice or a stop work order will be issued. Should you have any questions, please call me at the above number. Ford Construction -2- September 4, 1984 All of these items vale discussed with you at our meeting on September On 1984. Very truly yours, Richard C. Houghton Public Works Director RB.pmp OF RFC .} PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT UC SIGN/uTiLITV ENGINEERING 0 236 ?671 MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE.SO RENTON,WASH 98055 9 W P 1tFD SEP'ENe� BARBARA Y. SHINnOCH October 26, 1984 MAVOR Ford Construction Co. P.O. Box 6389 Federal Way WA 98063 Subject: South Tobin Street Sanitary Sewer CAG-037-84 - Suspension of Work Gentlemen: At a meeting this date between yourselves and members of the Public Works Department, it was mutually agreed upon to suspend work on the referenced contract until June 19b5, to avoid public inconvenience as a result of the high probability of being unable to complete the repaving. Said suspension shall be in accordance with tie provisions of Section 8 of the Standard Specifications. Also, in accordance with Sectior 8 of the Standard Specifications, you will be required to resume work when so directed by the Engineer and to take precautions to prevent damage to or deteriorations of the work during the period of suspension. As your contract time has expired, it will be necessary to secure the concurrence of your bonding company regarding this suspension of work. Also, all licenses, bonds, permits and insurance are to be continued until the works completed. Should you have any questions please contact me at the number listed above. Very truly yours, Donald G. Monaghan, P.E. Design Engineer :Ckd of I? � r z PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT DESIGN/UTILITY ENGINEERING 0 235 263; i G >� MUNICIPAL BUILDING ]M MILL AVE.$0. RENTON WAS,.960bb b P rED SEPT BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH September 12, 1984 MAYOR Ford Construction Company HAND DFLIVEWED P.O. Box 5036 Kent WA 98031 Subject: South Tobin Street Sanitary Sewer Work Progress Gentlemen: The contract completion date for the referenced project is October 17, 1984. Per the Weekly Statement of Working days dated September 11, 1984, there were 28 working days remaining on the contract as of September 7, 1984. A "Schedule of Completion" submitted by your office at the beginning of the project indicated August 17 for the installation of Manhole 01. A revised Schedule of Completion was submitted September 3 indicating September 6 as the date for installation date for Manhole el, including backfill and compaction. Manhole ►1 was actually installed September 10 and a. this date backfill and compaction has not been den . Your attention is directed to Sectiun 8-1.03 of the Standard Specifications: "The progress schedule and supplementary progress schedules shall be consistent With time and order of work requirements of the contract. Adequate material , equipment, and labor shall be provided by the contractor to carry out the progress schedule submitted by him and to complete the contract within the time specified." In accordance with Section 5-1.13 "All work under the contract shall be performed under the continuous supervision of competent personnel experienced in the class of work specified, and incompetent or careless or negligent employees shall be forthwith discharged by the contractor upon written request by the Engineer." It is your responsibility as contractor to evaluate your personnel and equipment and to adjust your forces and equipment as necessary to complete the work within the proscribed contract time, or the City may direct you to do so. It is suggested that you take direct charge of the project. As of this date there have been no reasons for delays which would justify an extension of time on the subject contract. You are therefore advised that liquidated damages in the amount of $210.00 per workinq day will be assessed in accordance with Section 8-1.09 of the Standard Specifications, for any days for which an extension of time is not granted. You are also reminded that you will be responsible for maintenance of the project area if extended over the winter months. Ford Construction Company September 12, 19B4 Page 2 Please be advised that there is a potential for damage and loss of business claims from prrperty owners affected by your operation. Please provide this office with a supplementary progress schedule conforming with the work to date and the order in which you plan to complete the project. Should you have any questions contact me at 235-2631. Very truly yours, Donald G. Monaghan, F.E. Design Engineer `- :ckd cc: international Fidelity Insurance Co, i9y Certified Mail) 24 Conmerce Street Newark NJ 07102 pF RF hT U 7 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT RICHARD C HOUGHTON • DIRECTOR MUNICIPAL BUILDING 300 W LL AVE $0 RENTON,WAEH.M066 q, P 206 73` 2569 �D�rFc �Pit� BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH October 9. 1094 MAYOR Charlie L. Ford FORD CONSTRUCTION CO. P. 0. Box 6289 Federal May, MA 98063 SUBJECTr South Tobin Street Sanitary Sewer Project Dear Mr, Ford: Your letter of October Sth has been reviewed by this office. A number of issues discussed in said letter need answer. Initially you contest your responsibility for paying the Starkovitch/ McGarry claim for damages. Your explanation is that the City did not obtain necessary lands for the conttruction of this project. However, you were provided with a IS ft. easement and a prudent contractor would have found that sufficient enough land in which to complete the constrw - tion. Also, you attempted to use a sloped ditch approach which of necessity went behind the easement provided to you and destroyed the access to McGarry's business. This was your choice of methods and .rot the City's. You are referred to th,s contract which places the respon- sibility for such claims on you. You have also complained about water on the job. Please refer to the contract specification documents which detailed the water problems on this project. There is nothing that you encountered the+ should have surprised you. You have also extended the problems which you experienced on the job. The major)+V of those problems were of your own making or were of so re,nlpr*J in nature that they should have been easily resolved. In fact, •, data. the City has not received a request for extra compensa- tion or for extra time. The City believes the+ this is due to the fact that you realize there Is no extra work involved and ri conditions which Involve an extensic.r of time. You have also aer+,boed In the letter the matter of Stop Mork Orders. They were necessary because you felled to properly prosecute your work and to provide access to the McGarry Company'a property despite the feet the+ McGerrry had been denied access for nearly a eonth. If you believe • Ford Construction -2- October 9, 1984 the "top Work Orders have been unfairly Issued you should have appealed them. Rather you did nothing. You mention that you had over 20 people in your employ that were capable of completing restoration while continuing pipelaving operations. A check with City personnel indicates that no more than S person; were ever on the job at any one time. A further cherk with other owners indicates that other of your projects are undermanned and behind time. It appears unrealistic that 20 persons were available for work On this particular project. If those persons ware available one must question why It took you one month to remedy Mc0arry's problem. You complain about the City's requirement that a compaction test be done. You Initially compacted with a small machine which the inspector had doubts about and whether or not the area would pass the compaction require- ments. Subsequently you brought in extra equipment and continued the com- paction and the area was compacted at least an additional 6". From this Information It is clear that the original compaction would have been insufficient and the City was correct in requesting the test. The fact that you ordered paving materials without checking with the inspector as to the acceptability of prior compaction is imprudent on your part and can not be blamed on the City. Further, you complain about the City's Stop Work Order due to Infiltration of water into the main line. You claim that the Inspector didn't check the plug Installed to prevent such infiltration. In fact the City staff did notice that the plug was improperly installed but the installation was done by your company and not by the City. Additionally, at least two City employees witnessed the amount of infiltration and It was substantial. This infiltration was a violation of both the contract specification and Metro policy. I am at a loss as to how you can criticize in this Instance. Lastly, you complain about the City's contac"ng the bonding company. Your performance to data has not been satisractory and the job Is signl- ficantly behind time. The City as considered removing you from the job. Under those circumstances the City must contact your bonding company. If the bonding company has seen its way clear not to write bonds to you that is a problem between you and them caused by your own actions. It would be shortsighted of the City to require a bond and then threaten the viability of that bond by hot contacting the bonding company when significant problem& ere encountered. The City is willing to work with you to try and finish this project. However, you are cautioned to cl Oss ly to l low the spec it scat Ions. Any further violation of the specifications will cause the City to review the possibi- lity of removing you from the job. Until such time as you have adequately completed this job the City will not consider you as a bidder on another future City project. Ford Construction -3- October g, Igls You have now had three City projects In the last three years and ell three have been finished late and we have had substantial problems In the perfor- mance cf the work. It is only prudent for the City to scrutinize ell of your problems In IIM with determining whether or not to consider you an acceptable bidder In The future. It you feel aggrieved by this letter, 1 would suggest that your company and tee Public Yorke Department sit down and attempt to resolve the ewlst- Ing problems. Very truly yours, Richard C. Houghton Public Works Director LWtpmp 4ia 91 9 Z 9. 9 42 1 0 9 z I r CIAis i 0.2 o a5 2 lo•ro p q crier N6 �r 9nala4 II ' n0• 1 GlO ►ay. Neo�o lrt0 NYOTp# I10-F I to 110 .1 TM p.h MM.'i •a R1a1tV Y,A(WF 1 2� i 121 • i 61 Sfw •ai.cb 0E I'10411' M k' lal a-�� •1 l,1y y G O,.O w,if %Nw�.m45 m.a I � V• --� 710 i0 11 a �n, I M V „?' ?' IY `zo-r� nO • � �� 3 �c a �0 15 2 �o>,b E.of 'O`0 *10 • .. - �,... }..,.tl •,ti ti.f.,.r MDO J Oil b 1 1 r 10•t OW 02 i • 7 Nam 1RS --- m.. wN V n •� OF RF i U 1 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ■ R;CHARD C HOOGHTOR • DIRECTOR O � F MUW C:vAt BUILDING E00 MILL AVE 10 RENYON,WAalt MOfi6 c 206 235 2%9 1 rE0 SE v�E� SARBARA Y. SHINPOCH October 9, 1984 MAYOR Charlie L. Forl FORD CONSTRUCTION CO. P. 0. &,- 6280 Federal Ray, MA 98063 SUBJECT: South Tobin Street Senitar+ Sewer Project Doer Mr. Ford: Your letter of October 5th has been reviewed by this office. A number of Issues discussed in said letter need answer. Initially you contest your responsibility for paying the Stark ,vitch/ McGarry claim for damages. Your explanation is that the City did not obtain necessary lands for the construction of this project. However, you were provided with a 15 ft, easement and a prudent contractor would have found that sufficient enough land in which to complete the construc- tion. Also, you attempted to use a sloped ditch approach which of necessity went behind the easement provided to you and destroyed the access to WGerry's business. This was yoir choice of methods and not the City's You are referred to this contract which places the respon- sibility for such claims on you. You have also complalned about water on the Job. Please refer to the contract specification documents which detailed tM water problems on this project. There 1s nothing that you encountered that should have surprised you. You have also extended the problems which you experienced on the job. The majority of those problems were of your own making or were of so minimal in nature that they should have been easily resolved. in fact, to data, the City has not received a request for extra compense- tlon or for extra time. The City believes that this is due to the foot that you realize there is no extra work involved and no conditions which Involve on extension of time. You have also mentioned in the letter the matter of Stop Mork Orders. They were necessary because you failed to properly prosecute your work and to provide access to the McGarry Company's property despite the fact that McGerr� had been denied access for nearly a month. If You believe 01 Ford Construction -d- October 9, 1984 the Stop Work Orders have been unfairly Issued you should have appealed them. Rather you did nothing. You mention that you had over 20 people in your employ that were capable of completing restoration while continuing pipelaying operations. A check with City personnel Indicates that no more than S persons were over co the job at any one time. A further check with other owners Indicates that other of your projects are undermanned and behind time. It appears unrealistic that 20 persons were available for work on this particular project. If those persons were available one must question why it took you one monti. to remedy McGarry's problem. You complain about the City's requirement that a compaction test be done. You initially compacted with a small machine which the inspector had doubts about and whether or not the area would pass the compaction require- mants. Subsequently you brought in extra equipment and continued the com- paction and -he area was compacted at least an additional 6". From this information t is clear that the original compaction would have been insufficient and the City was correct 'n requesting the test. The fact that you ordered paving materials without checking with the inspector as to the acceptability of prior compaction is imprudent on your part and can not be b,amed on the City. Further, you complain about the City's Stop Work Order due to infiltration of wafer into the main H ne. You claim that the Insp' or didn't check the plug installed to prevent such Infiltration. In f. ct the Cit staff did notice that the plug was improperly installed but the installation was done by your company and not by the Citt. Addit;onally, at least two City employees witnessed the amount of infiltration and it was substantial. This Infiltration was a violation of both the contract speci ication and Metric policy. I am at a loss as to how you can criticize in this instance. Lastly, you complain about the City's contacting the bonding company. Your performance to date has not been satisfactory and the job is signi- ficantly behind time. The City has considered removing you iron the job. Under those circumstances the City must contact your bonding company. If the bonding company has asan its way clear not to wri,'e uonds to you +het Is a problem between you and them caused by your own actions. It would be shortsighted of the City to require s bond and then threaten the viability of that tond by Mot contacting the bonding company when significant problems are encountered. The City is willing to work with you to try and finish this project. However, you are cautioned to closelyfollow the specifications. Any further violation of the specifications wi L' cause the City to review the possibl- lity of removing you from the job. Until such time as you have adequately completed this job the City will not consider you as a bidder on another future City project. Ford Construction -S- October 9, 1984 You have now had three City projects In the lest three years and all three hove been finished late and we have had substantial problems ,nthe perfor- mance Of the work. It is only prudent for the City to all of your problem< in line with determining whether or not to :onsider you an ac.sptable bidder in the future. If you feel aggrieved by this letter. I would suggest that your company and the Public Works Department sit down and attempt to resolve the exist- ing problems. Very truly your:, n Richard C. Houghton Public Works Director l W:pmp of RF U R ° PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT RICHARD C HOUGHTON • DIRECTOR In w: R MUNICIPAL BUILDING 7D0 MILL AVE S0. RENTON,WASH "055 �P 206 235-2569 'rEo sEP�E`� BARBARA Y. WNPOCH �c-ober 5, 1984 MAYOR MEMORANDUM TO: Larry Marren FROM: Richard Houghton SUSBJECT: Ford Construction Larry: Attached please find the latest from Ford, hand delivered this a.m. Can you give me some guidance this afternoon??? Thanks. PMP Attachment 1 PUKICOWOKS FORD CONSTRUCTION CO. GENERAL ENGINEERING CONTRACTOR P.O. BOX 6289 • FEDERAL WAY, NASHINGTON 98063 BUS. f1061 838-8010 October 5, 1Y80 City of Renton public works Department 100 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 Attention: Richard C. Houghton, Public works Director RE: South Tobin Street Sanitary Sewer Dear Mr. Houghton: Your letter of September 11, 1984, forwarded to us Mr. McGerry's letter of September 17, 1984, outlining a forthcoming claim by him, on the above referenced project. We are installing the new sewer project for you, the City. we will not be solely respon- sible for any claim for monetary damages made by Mr. McOerry. The City is required to obtain the necessary lands for the con- struction of it 's project. In talking with Mr, Starkoviteh on the site, he stated that an explanation as to the scope of the work to be performed was not given to him by the City. The tie-in to the existing Metro lire was and could not be anticipated to be of a minor scope. Cthet than the the a-day delay caused by the mechanical failure of our excavator the time required for the tie-in was not unrealistic or unjustified. we have overcome a series of pinblems on the pro,+ect as follows: Opon our preliminary investigation by excavation of the area, we encountered a considerable amount of ground water. We elected to drill wells. Upon talking to Metro about our dewaterinq plans, they instructed us that no inatalla- tion of wells could take place within 17 feet of their main. The ma3oritu of the groundwater in the area of the tie-in was travelling in the select fill placed around the Metro line. with a required setback for our wells of 17 Feet, we could not dPMater the sane required.Tnstead our wells penetrated only into the clay/silt soil indigenous to the area. With Our wells in these soils that do not conduct water, our efforts we-e fruitless. City of RRnton October S, 1984 Page S After a period of two weeks, and with no change in the groundwater level, we elected to open-sump the excava- tion. On August 31, you instructed us to close the open excavation and restore utility service to Mr. McGarry before our work on the tie-in had begun. On September a, you placed a stop work order on the project due to the fact that Mr. Mccerryts office did not have utility services. We may remind qca that there was no way for Mr. McGarry to conduct business out of his office, due to the tact that there was an open excavation 9 feet deep at the front steps of his office. This action by you was frivolous the impractical. Because of the written order he had given the previous Friday to restore service and bsekfill the excavation prior to completion, your in- spector felt it should be enforced. Upon a personal visit to your office, the situation was rectified after informing You of the actual situation, which apparently no one had done prior to that time. After a length of time trying various .methods, we finally came close to the Metro main. Upon reaching a close proximt�q to the main, we encountered steel sheeting left in place .nen the main was installed. The sheeting made it impossible to excavate the area around the main without alternative methods. We scheduled in a clam-shell type excavator to perform the final portzon of the excavation. Aft *r finally dawaterinv and exposing the main, we found that we had centered our sheeting and box in direct, align- ment with a joint on the main. This made it impossible to core the main with the sheeting configuration. After re- aIiening the box, we were finally able to mako the tie-in. A ter we made the tiein, we commenced backfilIiny. Curing .,ackfill Operations, we were instructed by your inspwctor to use the vibratory compactor, which nearly resulted in the permanent damage to the existing structure leased by Mr. McGarry, On September lt, you placed a stop work order or the project because we did not cease pipelaying operations to begin restoration on Mr. Mcaerry's property. You then called in the police, who threatened us with arrest it we did not comply. We had at that time over 20 persons in our employ and were completely capable of completing restoration vh•le continuing pipelaying operations. city of Fenton October S, 1984 Page J We completed preparation for paving Mr. mcGerryas property cn September loth. Your in.,rector then arrived on the site and informed us he would require compaction testing on the area to be paved. It is the owner.t ra- sponsibility to obtain and perform testing services so as not to delay the contractor in :he performance of his work. On September loth, the testing crew arrived and performed the necessary tests, which passed. This delay in obtaining testing services cost of the loss of I3 tons cf AsphaIt, which was on the site a: ti.e time your inspector mentioned tests would be required. we lost the next day to testing and not being able to reschedule our paving crew until the following day. The next day was lost for paving due to adverse weather. The Area was finally paved three days after your inspector required testing And during this time you were also enforcinq the stop work orJ• r placed on the pipelaying portion of the project. Now can we proceed to your satisfaction if you do not obtain testing and enforce Inapplicable stop work orders? On October 1, your office reported that -over halt a pip., of groundwater was being allowed to enter the metro main•. Again another stop work order was issued to us. Your in- spector never oven physically checked the plug installed to prevent such infiltration. It he had, he would have round that thv infiltration was resulting from a slight amount of water leaking around the manhole collar, amounting to a stream nu wider than a pencil Again your office acted without real.z- ing the fact. And the practicality of the statements they were making. On September 20, we installed wells in the vicinity of manholes 2 and 3, only to find a slight amount cl g,undwater. Upon excavating near manhole 02, we found on old creak channel at approximately if feet in deprt, that had been filled it Probably some time near the turn of the Century, we could not foresee that Jo feet from where we lriilen a practically dry wall, there was an aquifer delivering hundreds of gallon per minute ir.o Our excavarion, yet we are ponalized for a lack of ncn-performance. As of this writing, it appears that we have come out of the wetter subsurface areas of the subsoil and can only hope that It improves. On September a, you held the Sower Rehabilitation Cont act, on which we submitted the Apparent low bid, hostage pending the Outcome of our performance on the Tob/n Street Project. City of Renton October 5, 1904 Page 1 On September le, you awarded ae Project to Skip Jacobsen Construction. we feel that this action was totally unfair. You cannot compare the performance of this contract with its many unforeseen difficulties to that of a contract in the future with a different scope. we are currently in contact with our attorneys to determing our legal standing for the possibility of a suit for anticipated profits. We have been striving to satisfactorily progress on the project, but in light of the groundwater problem, aforementioned unforeseen subsurface conditions and frivolous acts by quo and your re- presentatives, we can only progress as fast as conditions dictate, which is apparently not good enough for you. Without considering the facts, you have threatened us with taking the project out of our harts and placing it with our bonding company. You awarded a project to another contractor to which we were entitled. You ylacec stop work orders on us without first considering the facts or justifications. You failwd to properly schedule testing se as not to delay our progress. We only hope that we can resolve issued with you without threats and frivolous actions. Rather than dealing with us directly, you have exerted out- side pressure on us by involving our bonding company. WE are now prevented from bidiing any future projects until :his situation is resolved. Sincerely, FJRG CONSTRVCTlgff,O. / ..7 ....�. ,r ' Charlie L. Ford CLF;lrj Co. Terri Mc,:onnell, Corroon, R1aok a Dawson P. o, sox C-31201 Seattle, Washington 91124 International Fidelity Insurance Co. 14 commerce Street Newark, New Jersey 08102 L.uck4, Lamb a Oros, Attorneys at Law '0 Logan 9ui.ding Saatrle, Washington 98101 Barbara Y, Shinpoch, Mayor Municipal $wilding 100 Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 FNCRb V PHU fif+!-r1 SULP4 TUBIN sTRLET W4141TRRY SLIER SGNEPULE (W REVENUE UNIT UIP VI le+1I PRI'_E !:)1HL MUBILL;HI ION LS IUOIJU.,SV IUUUO•QQ EPi•1`��CGRLS;LIh1U L� I.Vo 200.00 2000.00 ELECT '!W'_I F " L ,:tinaU.i)0 +i.00 F3000.08 f.:11 i I , ! f{ I YI ') t'1 S.00 4SIX).LAN S FIFc LLDIitN ':L L TN iiLMC.iU 9.U8 9600.Oe +.P' MHNNULV' EN Nov 1280.00 6000.00 '.E '.P �``h" ,c. '9 S.N.08 6000.07UAA0 lUd.M 4"MB.Oki I+ t.lUrl L�Nt �4 t� y � .., ! SQVUp.LA' IVUUN.LA.SJ it 1 1 � ".j,j F G'a I.UU 1ZVO,UL' 14 IN a�. 32.04� Id800.0U l in RUN i a. : •l '•' ;": ;'}.1tt. 'f ".380$.8W i tf�i �-•�1 i881�J.0f) -MO.iv 200U.k`L 144)U.r.Ich I008.8t+' . • .l.u?U.i'Ll No.0U •�'+o9t.DC .. SSEISI.US e � � .en .t,:, .yw .1*+J �CAN t�Q �kNd .� .� .N4� ,� .� ,@F �{� ,� .9�1 .� .�q .4� .tat .k"9 ,:}n r � FORD CONSTRUCTION CO. GENERAL ENGINEERING CONTRACTOR P.O. BOX 6289 a f'EDE'RAL WAY. WASHINGTON 98W BUS. I206i 838-8020 • October 5, 1964 city of Renton Public Works Department Vl. 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 - t$` Attentions Richard C. Houghton, Public Works Director kS: South Tobin Street Sanitary Sever Dear Mr. Houghton: Your letter of September 22, 1984, forwarded to us Mr. Mccarry's letter of September 17, 1994, outlining a forthcoming claim by him, an the above referenced project. We are installing the new sewer project for you, the City. We will not be solely respon- sible for any claim for monetary damages made by Mr. McGarry. The City is required to obtain the necessary lands for the con- struction of it 's project. In talking with Mr. Starkovitch on the site, he stated that an explanation a, to the scope of the work to be performed was not given to hip by the City. The tie-it, ro the existing Metro line was and could not be anticipated to be Of a minor scope. Other than the three-day delay caused by the mechanical tailor& of our excavator, the time required for the tle-ln was not unrealistic or unjustified. We have overcome a series of problems on the project as lollowss Upon our preliminary inveotigatlon by excavation of the are , we encountered a considerable amount of ground rater. We elected to drill wells. Upon talking to Metro about our dewatering plans, they instructed us that no instslla- tion of wells could take place within 12 toot of their main. the majority of the groundwater in the area of the tie-in was travelling in the select fill placed around the Metro line. With a required setback for out wells of 12 feet, we could not Bowater the rvne required.lnstead our wells penetrated only into the cla! lsilt soil indigenous to the area. With our wells in these soils that do not conduct water, our efforts were fruitless. city of k6nton October S, 198e Page J After a period of two reeks, and with no change in the groundwater level, we elected to open-sump the excav&- tion. on August 11, you instructed us to close the open excavation and restore utility service to Mr. McGarry before our work oil the tie-in had begun. On September e, you placed a atop work order on the project due to the fact that Mr. McOerry's office did not have utility services, we may remind you that therm was no way for Mr. McGarry to conduct business out of his office, due to the fact that there was an open oxo&►atlon 0 feet deep at the front steps of his offloe. rhi-s aetlor by you was frivolous the Impractical. Because of the written order he had given the previous Friday to restore sore oe and backfill the excavation prior to completion, tour in- spector felt it should be enforced. Upon a personal vial to your office, the situatJon was rectified after informlig you of the actual situation, which apparently no one had done prior to that time. After a length of time trying various methods, we finally r came close to the Metro main. Upon reaching a close proximity to the Main, we oncountervd steel sheeting left In pte-o when the main wee Installed. The sheeting made it impossible to excavate the area aretnd the main without alternative methods. we scheduled in a clam-shell typo excavator to Perform the final portion o: the excavation. After finally dewateriny and exposing the main, we found that we had centered our sheeting and box in Jlreet &lJgi - ment with a joint on the main, this made at Impossible to core the main with the sheeting configuration. After re- aligning the box, we were finally able to Make the -It-Jr. After we made the tiein, we commenced backt111ing, purJng backfill operations, we were Instructed by your inspector to use the vibratory compactor, which nearly resulted in the permanent damage to the existing structure leased by Mr. McGarry. On September 17, you placed a stop work order on the prcj„ct because we did not cameo pipolaying operations to begin restoration on Mr. McGarry-* property. You then called it the Pa Jiee, who thrvatened us with &treat If we die not We had at that tiMe over JO persons in our employ and wart completely capable of eompi. Ing restoration while contJnt Jhg pipel&ving operations. City of Renton October 5, 1911 page 3 We completed preparation for paving on Mr. McCerrg 's propertC on September loth. Your inspector then arrived on the site and Informed us he would require compaction testing on the area to be paved. It is the owners re- sponsibility to obtain and perform testing services so AN not to delay the contractor in the performance of his work. On September 19th, the testing crew arrived and performed the necessary tests. w'lich passed. This delay in obtainlna testing services of the loss of I3 tons Of asphalt, which was on the . • at the time your inspector mentioned tests would be required, we lost the next day to testing and not being able to reschedule our paving crew until the fallowing day. The next day was lost for paving due to adverse weather. The area was finally paved three days after your inspector required testing and during this time you were also enforcing the stop work order placed on the pipelaying portion of the project. Now can we proceed to your satisfaction if you do not obtain testing and enforce inapplicable stop work orders? On October 1, your office reported that *over halt a pipe of groundwater was being allowed to enter the Metro Main-. Again another stop work order was issued to us. Your in- spector never even physically checked the plug Installed to prevent such infiltration. if he had, he would have found that the infiltration was resulting from a slight amount of water leaking around the manhole collar, amounting to a stream no wider than a pencil. Again your office acted without reai:z- ing the facts and the practicality of the statements they were making. On September 28, we installed wells in the vicinity of manholes 7 and 3, only to find a slight amount of groundwater. Upon excavating near manhole 02, we found an old creek channel At approximately 18 feet in depth, oat had been filled in probably some time near the turn of the Century. we could not foresee that 20 feet from where we drilled a practically dry well, there was an aquifer delivering hundreds of gallon per minute into our excavation, yet we are penalized for a lack of non-performance. As of this writing, it appears that we have come out of the wetter subsurface areas of the subsoil and can only hope that it improves. On September a, you held the Sewer Rehabilitation Contract, on which we submitted the apparent low bid, hostage pending the outcome of our performance on the Tobin Street project. A • City of Renton %ctober 5, 1984 rage 8 On September 18, you awarded the Project to Skip Jacobsen Construction. We feel that this action was totally utfair. You cannot compare the performance of this contract with its many unfo r:seen difficulties to that of a contract in the future with a different scope. We are currently in contact with our attorneys to determing our legal starving for the possibility of a suit for anticipated profits. We Nave been striving to satisfactorily progress on the projec' , but in lignt of the groundwater problem, aforementioned unfore aan subsurface conditions and frivilous acts by you and your re- presentatives, we can only progress as fast as conditions dictate, which as apparently not good enough for you. Without considering the facts, you have threatened us with taking the project out of our hands and placing it with our bonding company. You awarded a project to another contractor to which we were entitled. You pIacee stop work orders on us without first considering the facts or justifications. You failed to properly schedule testing 80 as not to delay our progress. We only hope that we can resolve issued with you without threats and frivolous actions. Rather than dealing with us directly, you have exerted out- side pressure on us by involving our bonding company. WB are now prevented from bidding any future projects until this situation is resolved. Sincerely, P004 CONSTPVCTI O. i C Arlie L. Ford CLF:irj cc: Terri McConnell, Corroon, Black a Dawson P. 0. Box C-38101 Seattle, Washington 98114 International Fidelity Insurance Co. :8 Commerce Street vewark, New Jersey 08101 Loucks, Lamb 8 Oros, Attorneys at Law 8:O Logan Building Seattle, Washington 98101 Barbara Y, Shinpoch, Mayor Municipal Building 100 Avenue South Renton, Washington 90055 f A /RPo27 WAY o __ y 5. rt r c.uM 6 rf2 E er I i V W h y S. Toes /-`3 rR E6T • Z 5, 2."'0 mud to -r�lu ,,/ �t .v f �go .d . �� U / O M `t P 12POIZ7 WAy I � i O - � i f�f 4 t I I 0 ` r OF RFti r f..� O OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY RENTON,WASHINGTON U I� Zoo .o+.U—'Wa.. ..a a 1.V.UT • WW. !af M.f n P p LAW RENCE 7 WARREN DAN;EL KELLOGG, •srvu.T c...•T.aaxw+ 9q4p a DAVID M DEAN, uwfra+r ururTors• "•)pp SEPtlK'04Q MARK E.BARBER. •auu•wr on•now+f• ZANET TA L.TONTEB. •aou.wT c...... October 5, 1984 MARTHA A FRENCH..waruo crT•411p • TO: Bob Bray, Engineering FROM: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Rc: CAG 057-84 - 1984 Sanitary Sewer Rehabilitation - COnLracC Documents Dear Bob: I have reviewed the above contract and it is approved as to legal form. Lawrence Jarren LJW:nd v/M Encl. rc: Mayor L� A l2P02T WR y 0 y ucuM T.e � J b y C U � Z � h � ToeiN s rR E I L zN° � T2 �t r Bak' : (Ou{t� y -for C (Os u✓e 90.1 y o� i FORD CONSTRUCTION CO. GENERAL ENGINEERING CONTRACTOR P.O. BOX 6289 a FEDERAL WAY. WASHINGTON 9800 BLIS. (206) 838-8020 October 5, 1984 City of Renton Public works Department :00 Mill avenue South Renton, Washington 9805S Attention: Richard C. Houghton, Public works Director RB: South Tobin Street Sanitary Sewer Dear Mr. Boughton: Your letter of September 21, 1984, forwarded to us Mr. McGetry's letter of September 17, 1984, outlining a forthcoming claim by him, on the above referenced project. we are installing the new sever project for you, the City, we will not be solely respon- sible for any claim for monetary damages made by Mr. McGarry. The City is required to obtain the necessary lands for the con- struction of it 's project. In talking with Mr. Starkov'cch on the site, he stated that an explanation as to the stops of the work to re performed was not given to him by the City. The tie-in to the existing Metro line was and could not be anticipated to be of a minor scope. Other than the three-day delay caused by the mechanical failure of our excavator, the time required for the tie-in was not unrealistic or unjustified, we have overcome a series of problems on the project as follows: Upon our preliminary investigation by excavation of the area, we encountered a considerable amount of ground water. we elected to drill wells. Upon talking to Metro about our dawatering plans, they instructed us that no installa- tion of wells could take place within 12 feet of their main. The majority of the groundwater in the area of the tie-in was travelling in the select fill placed around the Metro line. with a required setback for our wells of 12 feet , we could not dewater the son& required.lnstead our wells penetrated only into the clay/silt soil indigenous to the area. w.th our wells in these soils that do not conduct water, our efforts were fruitless. City of RRnton October 5, 1984 Page 7 After a period of two weeks, and with no change in the groundwater level, we elected to open-sump the excava- tion. On August dl, you instructed us to close the open excavation and restore utility service to Mr. MCGerry before our work on the t.e-in had begun. On September a, you placed a stop work order on the project due to the fact that Mr. MOCerry.s office did not have utility services. We may remind you that there was no way for Mr. McGarry to conduct business out of his Office, due to the fact that there was an open excavation 8 feet deep at the front steps of his Office. This action by you was frivolous the Impractical. Because of the written order he had given the previous Friday to restore service and backfiIl the excavation prior to completion, your in- spector felt It should be enforced. Upon a personal visit to your office, the situatiun was rectified after informing you of the actual situation, which apparently no a" had done prior to that time. After a length of time trying various methods, we finally a came close to the Metro main. Upon reaching A close proximity to the main, we encountered steel sheeting left in place when the main was installed. The shee�ing made it impossible to excavate the area around the main without alternative methods. we scheduled in a clam-shell type excavator to perform the final portion of the excavation. After finally dewatering and exposing the main, we found that we had centered our sheeting and box In direct align- ment with A Joint on the main. This made it lmpo=sible to core the main with the sheeting configuration. A: ier re- aligning the box, we were finally able to make the tie-in. After we made the tlwin, we commenced backfilling. During backfill operations, we were Instructed by your Inspector to use the vibratory compactor, which nearly resulted In the permanent damage to the existing structure leased by Mr. McGarry. On September 17, you placed a stop work order on the project because we did nog cease pifelayinq operations to begin restoration on Mr. McGerry's property. You than called in the Police, who threatened us with arrest If we JiJ not comply. We had at that time over 70 persons in our employ and were completely capable of completing restoration while continuing pipe laying operations. city of Renton October 5, lass Page 7 Me completed preparation for paving on Mr. McCerry's property on September lath. Your inspector then arrived on the site and informed us he would require compaction tasrng on the area to be paved. It is the owners re- sponsibility to obtain and perform testing services so as not to delay the contractor in the performance of his work. On September 19th, the testing cres arrived and performed the necessary tests, which passed. This de)ay in obtaininq testing services cost of the loss of 17 tons of asphalt, which was on the site at the time your inspector mentioned tests would be required, we lost the next day to testing and not being able to reschedule our paving erew until the following day. The next day was lost for paving due to adverse weather. The area was finally paved three days after your inspector required testing and during this time you were also enforcing the stop work order placed on the pipelaying portion of the project. Now can we proceed to your satisfaction if you do not obtain testiry apd enforce inapplicable stop work orders? On October 1, your office reported that -over halt a pipe of groundwater was being allowed to enter the Metro Main-. Again another stop work order was issued to us. Your in- spector never ♦ven physically checked the plug installed to prevent such infiltration. If he had, he would have found that the infiltration was resulting from a slight amount of water leaking around the manhole collar, amounting to a stream no wider then a pencil. Again your office acted without realis- ing the facts and the practicality of the statements they were making. On September ls, we installed wells in the vicinity of manholes 7 and d, only to find a slight amount of groundwater. Upon excavating near manhole 01, we found an old creek channel At approximately la feet in depth, that had been filled in probably some time near the turn of the Century. we could not foresee that l0 feet from where we drilled a practically dry well, there was an aquifer delivering hundreds of gallon Par minute into our excavation, yet we are penalised for a lack of non-performance, As of this writing, it appears that we have come out of the wetter subeurfaoe areas of the subsoil and can only hope that it improves. On September a, you held the Sewer Rehabilitation Contract , on which we submitted the apparent low bid, hostage pending the OuteOme of our performance on the Tobin Street Project. City of Renton October 5, 19/4 Prye s On L pteaber 10, you .warded the Project t skip Jacobsen COASLTUCtiOn. Ne feel that this actror. was totally unfair. You cannot compere the perforaaace of this contract with ire many unforeseen dllficulties to that of a contract In the future with a different scope. we arm currently In contact with our attorneys to determing our legal standing for the possibility of a suit for anticipated profits. we have been striving to satisfactorily progress on the project, but In light Of the groundwater ptoblea, aforementioned unforeseen subsurface conditions and frivolous acts by you and your re- presentatives, we can only progress as fast as conditions dictate, which Is apparently not good enough for you. Without considering the facts, you have threatened us with taking the Froject out of our hands and placing it with our bonding company. You awarded a project to another contractor to which we were entitled. You places stop work orders on us without first considering CA• facts of schedule Justifications, You failed to properly e •chedul• testing so as net to delay our prug:ess. No only hope that we can resolve issued with you without threats and frivolous actions. Rather than dealing with us directly, you have exerted out- side pressure on us by Involving our bonding company. WE are now prevented from bidding any future projects until this situation is resolved. Sincerely, PO CONSTRUCT! O. C •ill• L. lord CLP:irj cc: Terrl McConnell, Cartoon, Black a Dawson P. O. Box C-J4101 Seattle, Washington 9i114 international Fidelity Insurance Co. J4 Commerce Street Newark, New Jersey 08102 LOUCka, Lamb s Ofos, Attorneys at Law 810 Logan Building Seattle, Washington 90101 Barbara Y, Shin, och, Nayot Nunicipal Building 100 Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 73MSrn. Sal Sasarlvf� �«�� `�Zrr /1!° �rl{ G?dlw..,IA � LOt.1.1 R,.1tlt�1. ' S�••1.'rL! /VII .e. , ��!/�ds Pa../a.w..,eQr( .:N•/ ,....♦...e{f�a rrr�a.F lest b.a:t'.w �+r fl yr N pre r.0,44 f b-'V.M. .d.e...1�4•+era. Jr/ts/3*• r 0,dd Zo..r/ p www » ►s,1,a,.,� - { �fi'a�P*' :./�..,1'ts .'Fw +•aerL fir ~f.Ja/` �M..+'t � Gawnajiew l+e.r•oe, t•�r.Nt.., �we. ,fra.k n� ><ra�a.- Ce.��r•e/. L"e..{T/e�1.. m.•flwd•"1� '.e,...t, i../.eaa. ::+'f+.a.a� :.... „ry H.w. ♦ aad-A r /'21t+ir w:w.h'/..•K .nil.+wi `:n,aAe1 ay.4�:.tr+y '�'s ,Mcr'rets,+ ,`�S Y1��' .�d R[ ,✓„`W` a... /:,'�,. .. ,.rr �� t"'1'•C-✓;. <..tfl.✓Ir 1'!wa i})♦ ,fl.r Jl 1, �,♦.. �//r Xrl/�rs AA...+fW {r/i y.v v ..-i fey./ 1tx.A,/fyta .P'jr� ie..'fl'fea.N, fX..�n.. G.tlf♦-.a/f'�y' 'AR. !•^ �1"dt Tip - •fr. 'S ar t • of KFro • • o PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT DESIGN/UTILITY ENGINEERING to 235.2631 "R R MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILI.AVE.$O RdNTON.WASH 9006h �9 b' P ,rEO SE PT SV'PF. BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR October 2, 1984 Ford Construction Co., Inc. P.O. Box 6289 Federal Way, WA 98063 Subject: South Tobin Street Sanitary Sewer Gentlemen: On Saturday, September 29, 198,, a field inspection by this office round groundwater from your sewer trench entering Petro's trunk line. Monday morning, October 1, 1984, It was discovered that the plug installed In the west and of the pipe was not seated propeirly and was allowing groundwater to enter the system. Your field superintendent has been advised on several occasions that no ground water would be permitted to enter the new ly-leld sower pipe. You are again reminded that all sewer trenches will be dewatered in accurdence with the specifications and no ground water will be permitted to enter the sewer system. If you have any questions, please call me at the above ro.muer. Very truly yours, Robert L. Bray Project Engineer :jft pF RE4 R T PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT _ DESIGN/UTILITY ENGINEERING 0 235-2631 V R&R& MUNICIPAL BUILDING 100 MILL AVE.$0. Re NTON,WASM Mdpa 0 0EP Lo SEP , BARHARA Y. SHINPOCH September 'I , 1984 MAYOR Ford Construction Co. P.U. Box 6289 Federal Way WA 98063 Subject: South Tobin Street Sanitary Sewer Gentlemen: Enclosed find a copy of a letter from C.J. McGerry Co, stating their intent to file a clai.n against the City as a result of your operations. As requested in my letter dated September 12, 1984, please provide a revised progress schedule for completion of the project and more specifically the schedule for completion of sewer installation and restoration of the Starkov kh property. Should you have Any questions please call me at 235-2631, Very truly yours, Robert L. Bray Project Engineer :ckd Enclosure OF RA, Al PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT DESIGN 'LTIL.IIY ENGINEERING 0 235.2631 MUNICIPAL BUILDING 700 MILL AVE $0 RENTON,WA&H sent r e P rE() �Erte�e� BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH September 12, 1984 MAYOR Ford Construction CGmpany P.O. Box 5036 Kent MA 98031 Subject: South Tobin Street Sanitary Sewer work Progress (wIntlemen: The contract completion date for the referenced project is October 17, 1984. Per the weekly Statement of working days dated September 11, 1984, there were 28 working days remaining on the contract a of September 7, 1984. A "Schedule of Completion" submitted by your office at the beginning of the project indicated August 17 for the installation Of Manhole 01. A revised Schedule of Completion was submitted September 3 indicating September 6 as the date for installation date for Manhole al , including backfill and compaction. Manhole al was actually installed September 10 and as of this date backfill and cmpactton has not been done. Your attention is directed to Section n 1.03 of the Standard Specifications: "The progress schedule and supplementary progress schedules shall be consistent with time and order of work requirement% of the contract. Adequate material , equipment, and labor shall be provided by tr. contractor to carry out the progress schedule submitted by him and to to the contract within the time specified." in accordance with Sectirn 5-1.13 "All work under Lhe contract shall be performed under the continuous supervision of competent personnel experienced in the class of work specified, and incompetent or careless or negligent employees shall be •nrthwith discharged by the contra=tor upon written request by the Engineer." It is your responsibility as corr:ractor to e,aluate your personnel and equipment and to adjust your forces and equipment as ne:essary to complete the work within the prescribed contract time, or the City may direct you to do so. It is suggested that you take direct charge of the project. As of this date there have been no reasons for delays which would justify or, extension of time on the subject contract. You are therefore advised that liquidated damages in the amount of $210.00 per working day will be assessed in accordance with Section 8-1.09 of the Standard Specifications, for any days for which an extensio,, of time is not granted. You are also reminded that you will be responsible for maintenance of the project area if extended over the winter months. Ford Construction Company September 12, 1484 Page 2 Please be advised that there is a potential for damage and loss of busi ess claims from property owners affected by your operation. Please provide this office with a supplementary progres_ schedule confn ming with the work to date and the order in which you plan to complete the projec,.. Should you have any questions contact me at 235-2631. Very truly yours, Donald G. Monaghan, P.E. Design Engineer :ckd cc: International Fidelity Insurance Co, 14 Commerce Street Newark NJ 07102 No /T AT NUMBER LR 2Q 43 PRE VIE)US RVT NOLQ- S/�%L a PACIFIC TB�TI�1 LABORATORIK% —� . 146.NU RING CONSULTATION a0rq:walwlC rN etc Y. =hlPSC rOM1 {YlCY11V!OIVICli Gf OIOG IC A<SURv f vs MhTf S,\<T EST,G ]!]O r IT. Vl%lq eals"M,}pgµ SOIL TEiT p11rNOS SEATT<E waSNINGtON60 , SOrI MSCr.ANICS , cS.y �Nf>T ACOfIES ,<.i 0Q /-//II Aee Sp. REtORTFO rs C'by FORTE 9"ZS•8s" PERMIT y vure=w�'OY'IO9� 1.11/�f/n 1.306 C3/'a�/ ARtNirEcr�y .� / PRO'Ec' Jam✓ 2oTfSfUnl�L lrf�WCr ENGINEFAUO.tS L3/iir/j��t/�l.�'l/?!O/a>7 �pt�liUM1B✓/N�///I✓P.��,y< A,; UMBER RD 1 1,4/bR/ Co,,acTOR �OI•<1 �TC/)l� G0. PURPOSE Oe,feti Vf as Nfsus Ys Fpi u<t,rc/<'� on f/e 4/�lzC/i��cz i.+ f/aq rGrc�/fr a/TS.e✓C �nrt///S✓s anc/ !'Jcsx�n�vrrr O�y 17�.�s.fi T�sfs, L/`L'cf'<'��sCr'o`\/ fq /Yre abu✓e �ora✓ic✓s Cily OF RENIONI� Af MAN<Y G C I L V 1 era.. PA MRSING OEM, Th s CNidrCandl att,h to IM Kt.,KV of IN,1a<W6 ob,..0 from the Xt, rail par,Gr, an,lrpr ohfOY4h4,11 madf wrtRn d1a 1CVM of the wort 6 Mhnad 1000 CPh,ICahon Nall n01 W COMN WII to,aplMnf nfpTCLM. apprOral OI wYaplante OI Othar asfOCJUd VMnE v a wa,gnty of desron or AoraawIt,o1 the foat,t,*1 l rEAWrEmanH CatdnA Naport by Pacific Tostr w laho,ator,el t""4+-+`a'"'`---- - ",. 7 4OAYE aPl NSlS GQS' 4UQF �V ,lf< Ar �' aOE Aw0 afa04N• TIM{V E,11f{SO eY •.• .. • 1 i I � 1 1 1 • 1 1 I. � .. ��.: - .;apt • rc� a�� = MSC::— _ —5=�'.�SSCQS'C•.�: -'C. :::Sg� nilii g=t -=asiicggss@'s_=ii$Hi-=am:e: pa ®ice .!`. N 0 � aps No :::a;: �I.a.■N■aaltl.ra� .M�NIMS1.NNI/sees ..N:N/.N:p: 1 a •:::::aa:aa:::.• EaN e 1 1 fl.. f':: a . f..... .. ....Ann N.8.sa. now Ann asa E 6"/a'i•x:aaa• :: :..:f.. .aa. ;;: Mil •;;a• • �ili=ii.•aia:i fGiG. :iia€afNi 1 pF 7i'Q,4, !"9 z PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT z ry _ JESIGN/UTIUTV ENGINEERING 0 235-2631 R MUNICIPAL 9W IDING Zoo MILL AVE.$O. RENTON,WASH.M055 q 0. EP lF0 SE PILWO BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAVON MEMORANDUM Date: September 21, 1981 To: Jane Mauch, Finance Department From: Bob Bergstrom, Engineering Supervisor Subject: C. J. McGerry w. - Pending Claim Jane: per your memo of 9/20/84, here is the background of toe referenced Cldiul. This 1s a City sanitary sewer project awarded to Ford Construction Co. on July 16. 1984. In order to install the sewer plain as designed, it was neces- sary to acquire a 15' construction easement across the property occupied by McGerry and owned by Rudy J. Starkovitch. Mr. Starkovich granted the ease- iient on May 22, 1984. The easement runs between two buildings occupied by McGerry, one being an office building and the other a storage shed. Behind the buildings to the west is an area used by McGerry to store lumber. In order to connect to the existing Metro trunkline in Burnett Ave. 5.(see print), it was necessary to excavate a pit approximately 25' deep. The contractor hegan preliminary work in the easement August 20, 1984 (install- ing well points, etc. On August 28, 1984, he began excavating the pit for the Metro tie-in. During the initial excavation, the contractor broke the sewer connection and the electrical service to McGerry's office building. These services were temporarily reconnected, however, the sewer connection was again broken the next day. On Augus . 29, 1984 at approximately 3:30 p.m., the contractor's excavating machine broke down and w-s not again in operation until September 4, 1984. On August 31, 1984, the City issued a correction notice ordering repairs be made to the utilities and building (the contractor tore the front steps loose from the building and undermined a corner of the building. He finally completed the tie-in to Metro's trunk line on September 7, 1984. During the period from August 28 to September 24, McGerry was unable to use his office building due to the contractor's operation. The contractor was directed by the Public Works Department to cease pipe-laying operations on September 17, 1984 until McGerry's office and parking lot were restored. This was completed on September 24, 1984. As of this date, McGerry is able to resume normal business; however, the contractor is continuing pipe laying across the westerly portion of Starkovich's property and will probably require another week to cross the property. Jane Mauch • - 2 - • September 27, 1984 It would appear that most of McGerry's allegations are valid considering the following: 1. He was not notified by the contractor as to when he was to begin construc- tion o, the time involved to complete construction (as required by the con- tract). 2. The extent of the excavation was such that he was unable to get access to his office building (see photos). 3. The original time schedule submitted by the contractor to complete the sewer installation across the Starkovich property was two to three working days. He has now expended 30 working days and is still approximately 5 days away from being off the Starkovich property. Attached are copies of some of our correspondence to Ford Construction Co. since the beginning of the project. If you desire additional information, nlease advise. - t RLu:jft ' CITY OF RENTON ENGINEERING DIVISION PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 235-2631 CORRECTION NOTICE JOB LOCATED Al The following wnrk does not comply with City codeS and i ordinances and must be CORRECTED and INSPECTED before this work can proceed any urt er. MC-777< 4vc . �7.o Zf Vy • o 'yr is n , DO NOT CEED W TH THIS WORK UNTIL ABO COR ONS HAVE BEEN MADE AND APPROVED I j Inspect . _ Date �? i9 ga DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE & A �^ I SPEED LETTER T0: • SUBJECT --�---. DATE: PROJECi:_"� _ r51 qne s C. J. MWEARY CO. 7 . 17, 1984 Sept. q 6 rhaenp gpmrs a1a - i18TM AVENUE S E ENTGN.WA51i1N weose T . TELEPHONE. (Y06)61 22 nd•317Y City of Renton 200 Mill Ave. South Renton, WA 98055 Dear Sir or Madam: This letter is to give the City of Renton notice tha, I will be filing a claim against said City for damages to my business used by sewer construction work at 75 Burnett South in Renton. Because of the nature of the work and the street and access being torn up 1 have been locked out of my business establishment for the past thirty days, since no access have been provided, and the utilities have been disconnected for the same period of time. Furthermore 1 was given an notice that this work was going to be done or when It would take place. The first 1 wsa to realise of it was when I saw the machinery move in on the property and start. trenching. I have not yet completely been able to calculate the amount of damages since they are still Also the amounts for a working on the property, ally to at business and inconvenience due to this work. Also have they not only not given me any eotice of when this work was to start, but they have not given me a date when they will be finished, ao I may once again start normal business operations. This letter will also corroberate a verbal claim made by Rudy Starkovich and myself in the City Engineers Office two weeks ago to Robert E Bergstrom, 2 I(� Very truly yours, ItjII C117rd McOerry CITY CLERK • -'kUREY • PRGE oul-A R bUUIH '1 01N STkEET SHNIIHRY SEWER Sr.HEDULE OF REVENUE N ! bIb WTY U4411 PRICE TUTFL E "''.rI111.1.Nt 10'1 L5 1.00 10000.0u 10000.@0 !:ENk1H!.er!.krJbB?NIi LS 1.00 40".00 .0130.w 1 bKt PILL: TN 2NHU.uO 4.Qu 6000.00 FUUNirNIION MFTL IN we.u0 S:uu 4800.00 PIK hELbINU LL b IN 12u0.wo b.W4 9680.00 46" MN4441C.L'. EH `•.i,5 I Au.NF1 6000.00 MMHNULE L,JkH WTH `JF _,u.00 1M.Oki 60001ft katLF WIK LF 1.4 r.yv 7..00 6:+712.00 lewtb LAP'E LF IUNe.UN 15.00 15".@0 �; h" 'EE5 EH SU.vj 100.00 30".00 QAN. 11. L.Q1,!. MH LH i.wu Axo.WV ibbl7.l''10 kuw To., METPQ EH 1.9e 1000u.00 1b000.00 aFWd. 'i 1 IIP.a LF t.I+N.Im 1.00 12uo.1a0 b TN 41ju.0a vta:.00 lib".00 tk!J HEt Fu.k TN E25.rtw S.bu Me.00 sY :lJ40.ve 2.00 7M.00 -------------------------- . ,.-- Bb f • rWukEV • PwjE 001-9 • "LRIUD M1 08- Ito-84 TO 08-JI-d4 N VY PICIUR UTY THIS UTY I'O1HL HMT PRIOR HM1 TH16 HMT TO1HL [' PERIODS PERIOD TO DATE PERIODS PERIOD TO DATE E 1 .UU .I$U .Old .U6 sUee.vU Livou.Ue .e! I.OU 1.e0 .00 200e..0e _S,0U.00 3 AN It eU r 00 .Ok) .eo Ou UU .ee .00 .160 .00 ,VV 0a .00 .00 .00 .UU .00 .VO ,UU .00 .HU .OT+ .90 .U0 .U0 .00 .00 .Oki .Utl cie .Uu .00 .ru) .� UO .00 .tie .1,;1 .Oki .00 @0 .ft .1"0 .Uu .0U .00 .eU .Ue+ LIU 00 .00 .OU .410 .UU e9 .4w ,ee 00 . 110 .f1:, .0U .ON :.iU ed .a .ee .e® .ee .n+ w ,00 .00 ee .ft .00 .U0 .Ve .loci ,OU Mii :.v a .00 2000.0t+ _ 00 0U titi a0 .00 .00 -..__-_----__ rUs1LIfHL .00 I 1,000.00 Pl1 lOP p� Q : 01 TLI 0y-ae-84 b UTY PRIt.OR UTV THIS oTV TOTAL t+MT PRIOR RMT THIS HMI TOTRL •t PERIODS PER101) TO DRTk PERIODS PERIOD TO DATE k .:tv 8-+60.Vv .00 8000.00 1.ea .00 1.0U 2e08.0U .00 ION.(LAO 11.U� �q� llt l�11 V*8:88 3 :�� +e@:00 1t�.�$� ,:�0 4oE��:Ot� IM i , .00 12ee.00 1200.00 e0 9600.00 9h00.as Vv 5.u0 S.VO .00 aue0.0e oV-vu.OW ue )V.6a 70.vv .ua ua00.60 60v0.ee a .ua I..4a.V0 1.'4C.00 .0e b+/12.00 .00 1009.e0 100e.u0 .v0 1504U.00 1Svel:1.a@ .tt0 r1E1.M 30.w .00 3ea0.00 D0a0.ee 0 1.Vv 1.e0 v0 20ev.0v. 2IQQU.00 tt .00 I.aV 1.00 .00 1000v.M4 Ivv0v.00 w .130 .00 .0e 00 .ve vv U0 olda8 VO 00 00 .00 .00 .v0 rt+ 0v vv .00 .Ve .Ve ya 0 2000.00 .00 :vuu.00 .00 .0E, .00 L qv a0 .00 .00 _..--------------..--__ 14000.0e 144312,09 I6Is1:.00 1297'2.00 161406.27 1743, b.27 T H wtkluU M3 10W1-0i IV 11,11. .a 1-04 k IIIY f'K10P vTV THIS UlY TOTHL HMT PRIOR WT THIS FIMT i:'THI. 1+ Pk1?IuDW PERIOD Tu LOTE RERIilDb PERIOD TO UHTE E ,dl+ !.0U SM.VV 2000.1) ]VUVV.00 1.VV .t+V I.W 24.1)0.00 .01111 2Vvv.0U It V'v.liv 400.V1! .:000.00 6400.00 ItoO.U0 8+ i±O.00 v0 2Vv.00 1tV0�OV 0V lr:V0.00 l4oO.VO Y600.00 .00 41ov.OU 11E v0 hd00.00 .0V cm@0.01) ^'•i"',+ .W I)U.OU 6000.00 .00 600W.00 .00 Id45.U0 bN"12.Oki .00 $-'12.W -' iU"J.VY .0u l two.00 ltV00.00 .00 1`,.ai3v.U0 30.VU .du 30.00 J000.Od .U0 jly)O.00 1. ."7 .s9V 1.0V dOUV.vV .0V L:lTI I.VO oki 1.0e I owe.00 .00 1 deve.00 ,�•t�.VV 1-vu.Oki .Ou 1200.00 ' .i+v ,400.0U 40161.0U .ev "ut %%jv 11300.00 9.00 o:'S.We 00 3 .00 5000.DO i•!'.dv.vb .94'?U.I+V ,00 pyi*.130 6,.mu.W 1. .•. . .Owi 1.0a zlMl.l+U .00 21.vv.ua Uls Ov 00 1000.Vd dr.'.v .U0 bw-am :wV.00 ------------- .:j'L'In1nl. a10w.P+) 19s..1c.VV s i :1 Fit 174374.27 'N." 27 H SOUT4 TOBIN STRELT SAWIRRY SENkk SCHEDUU O1 REVENUE N MlT MID OlY .tNIT VklA TOTHL k 'h'.'d211.:NtlOy LS 1.i0U ;WWO.1'JN 10400.00 LLkHkiNUaUkUbBIWj L`a 1.00 -1 YK .oe :ow.80 < 'ALE'_I bm t ILL 1 N 'W'00,9I0 4.w ONO.kilo d rLPJNDHT DiN HHT'L TN ball 00 W.tie 4bVU.W ✓iF": bt.iii':NG GL b 1'N 1".Vtl b.0tl Y600.00 b 4V" flw1tN'.i.k4 kH 5.N6 1:;dfA.N1 bwo.1e 4I0#* L L%:TkH IWTN VP �U.bH 1Gtl.Utl etl00.00 •�F, F' Nlrk LF 144o.vb :z.w _:91'12.ve "twt" t'1F'k, LF IUNtl.U0 15.UU 150".ve 'kks LM so.UU I tau.tlU jeoe."Ll k:+ItO. M1 kH :.Uli ::Qw.00 1 Bm.09 GUNH. TU METRO EN I." Igow.tltl 100".pJ0 '�MW.b1 T.i1W LF U"o.Ob 1.00 I&W.00 A.L. LL H« B IN 4W.0t1 .3 .Ub I ado.� CWJW*D kt r TN ffi25.IN W.ON 5M.00 ROH1rdHV E ;.V y'r 39atl.Uv 2.00 70N.00 r i UN .I. 1 i 000.UU I Owe.00 • p 1MI.+N "WN LLLHNUF• L. yu 'oft.BU SM." 'h' '�� 185frH2.88 15851.03 (UINt _I1S4l.V5 r�ACV • PAGE 001-8 rLRIUL 01 b8-15-84 TO 08-31-84 e +_ "tv NkILW UTY THJ$ UTV 10TAL. HMT PRILIR JiMT THIS MT TUTnL k+ERDJDS PEN 1UL TO WE PERLLZ$ R&RIUP TO UATE r dfJ .tl0 .k10 800Y.08 duOu.80 .Nl+ I.M I.W .80 7l00.E0 IWO.OU .Vt .u0 .Oki 300 .00 .N. kwI4 .,d0 .N0 .06 .00 .00 vl� .00 .0v .00 dr .00 0 0k' b0 Vi Ax .00 V0 Y+ .80 0 .k;U .00 00 -00 .00 .U4, ,0%; .0k/ y rw au .k:U vkr VV N r .ki0 .LT0 .k70 .00 ,0U .Nk` Ii .km .0ki .W .00 .00 .id8 1 a k'k kqk ON 00 .80 .00 .Uyl;? .VU . .N@ .00 WO We Wa 11 VQ 4LAO .NO .SO .80 .a0 k+0 W .00 .ft .00 i ' 4.kt0 LkV .00 :0 v.V", __."j.00 .00 .00 aWdit�IrtL _ _ ... ..NN _. li'00b.dv 1.ZUi+kd.0u� VU ...;"4_�b,'1 :T4QMTQT tlA`?;6r1 1WUi, ,��:�, :resort AA•�rs •;r 'r is*M 0®'*t6.io1 Q10'TTF4r1 A0'0A0ri 'i•+t,'rlgrtc . . 001 nA' A• 00•itM; 00' AA•0002 NA•i ,• AA' OA 00' o • f4w• Ak+' a; A0• ee• AA' 0A• PA I. Ni• :1 ee' 130. 04 flA AH• ..( 00'AkIAAt Aa•AecOT A0• 0*1 AA'T AiR• =1 0i1'AOkt? AA•AAB7 0A' oiA'I Ait•1 k°1:' B0'000£ 0B•BBOf: AA. AA*K ARh4f A.r A0'?0i;t 00'0A0Si AAA We"T Wasel Ai Rkl7i:r'.R OA'71._17$ AA` A0`15wt kul•Ge!T Nil r. nnn4 AA'000? FA" AA'AS AA•AC ri• A0.0BQ1 AA' AA'QWI�T 0A'Be?T AA n' oA AB'BBA? Oil•T AA• ,�,3'e„AAA An• tl�'1'k10AR 0A' ,?A' r1R' t 31N4 61 Vld3d S4QTM3d uw Gl (14IN314 44014'u ., 1N1C1 -WM SIHI 1Htl )40 Vid 1HH lk#111 A16 STHI A10 6114A 61A a 6$^ila'-FA fJ1 iA-.;al .•It 4h1*i� ,- • r )REY • PAL+ 00 t-P + 0-*R10D 03 to-al-rr+ Vu I"-dl-W L uTY PR/tW.' bll'r 'Hlb 4TY TOTHL HMT PRIOR HH` TH14 WTI TUTHL ll PERL&D$ PkAIUD Tu DHIL PER IUMy PERIOD TO DATE a0oo.a!+ idaa.t4! 1 o4im"oa I.VU .ad l.oa io00.lw .da .:Cluu.Ua .. I e4v.HV 4kV.ad .1400.aw) 1i40a,ad 1600.PV 8rVoo.oa tine,r?U au 460.t+S? 1 odor ao .0a i o?:?0.00 uoe.00 4oal?.old .Be vtO!?.00 9.i'+• E+d `.S.dd at4TP.00 .00 t 00'v'00 `0.vu .fN8 sa.00 two.oa 00 0000.OU 1.4o.4+r .0a ld46.W ;+_•JI;.dO .Ua "112.oa 10U0.00 .YaJ iaY0.90 I*wd.vv .uu 13VLKJ.UO 3o.oa o?d A.so 'Wou.00 00 :1000.t4a I.c?V .as I.W A!M.o0 a0 "l L)1.Od 1.LV .00 1.6t+ WM.old .00 lood0 06 .00 l.r .� I.80.ud .ad liar,00 I +u.da .k+d 4Uo.w 4*0.uo .00 IZm.W 1 '3V0.00 6a d25.66 6A.va .60 SM.60 Suda.00 091 -41,0 OU d450.od .oa 6"0.6W ? I.W .00 ? 1.Eri 000.00 .66 ltnfk+.00 1.00 1.aP .Od !I>do.go I0V' 00 i.ua at+ a0 S6u.66 "�00.uu . al�N+tilbiL. 17 ..li.da aldo0.ad 1'+ ': :e.VO PAH1 1;'437a.2' 33Sll.00 20't3 +..T t • 'kUKE4' • PHL•L• OW-H H ,1'F+TN iUNtN aTWEEI b"1111" 5El$k Sl.HEUULE OF RBPENUE k 1$11+ MY UN11 PHILE IU(HL Ir L °" 1L 1.'Hil!r+ L:+ 1.NU ltlO1JW.WU 1bU6N.0W +.L E Hk I H'.•". lkt+i,BIHU Ls 1.00 Ltltl0.U0 ee �!:..t..1 4w,kF ILL' IN AT A.I.l*i 4.Of) WOO.U0 t hUUNJHIION MHTL I boo.UW leUU 4600.Ue P1hE BLIJPIIL, t.L It TN 12WW,"v 0.00 96ft.ON 4U" MW1H1 '_E`• LH 5 O0 I;W0.Ntl abbe.UO MW'41jLL t,�JKH WIN 'dI• ie.UU 120.00 o0UU.0U '+wi% H'1PL LF 1246.N`I U-00 cv�Ln t It t, LP A We.00 15.00 15e► l.0U tL':. LH 'U.'-'1 t00.Oki B fokl.UO I, 1 , � EH . .,.v' -:UWb.00 "Wo.UU UNN. I+: TW,O LA 1.UN 1'1400.N 10000.ov ,HWL,UI I ,m. Lk 1[NH.Ui! 1.00 1"UU.00 H.L. L LH:, b IN 4tlW.bN J.:.Ob Uwe.Na L.i'K'yHEll kmf, TH fi:5.o" a.00 500e.0U N4•11 IHY V iY t54c;.0'� 2." 706U.UU 4 'r• L . 1 oU �000.00 lNON.ON CfI 1.+t0 I&W ON 1000.00 • .N t ,H Hr+: +.LLHN'S5' L, :.UU Wk •0 MAO +" 15651.05 �ulHl .11b43.N5 • k^)kEV • PAGE 001—P f,..MIUL 01 VS-13-84 TO 08--41-64 F t UTY PKILW UIY THIS UTY IOTHL RMT PRIOR HMI THIS HMT IJTRL I' PERIODS ,PERIUU TO DRIL PERIODS PERIOD TP DATE h I .vU .tlU .ou .00 bw.*.tlU Bt+UU.00 0U I.UU :.W .t40 INS.Ze 2Ukrii.00 VQ .uU as •Ov .00 00 0U tlu .00 tlb .U0 UB tdU k+U .Bu .00 .00 .00 00 .UO Vu .0tl .N UU 04 .IN .UU .1643 .BU .00 tlU .00 .00 Ou .00 UU .UO .&II .I& .!'U .UU .Okf .UU .Utl .NU .ul.+ .00 .BU II .w+ l+U NO Uu ON Ufa ket' Ut+ UO k++" .00 d0 UH UN Uu 1'(' .BU t+N 1y .ew .00 .ew .UU .00 .00 UU K4 .u0 Ui 80 .00 .till ..:n+ .UV .0 .UU .tlU .90 iU@U.U) U «;'.l�N.00 .99.per .tlV .fit+ •VY •� .VV .00 1 Um.09 16UUU.W NU 97 .U0 :.UO Tilt I-'k�71CGV • FRQE VV1 MWIUD Ni V7 A Tl' N 137V F•NTOR WTY I'Hla u1V T(71H1 HIT pR1Ck MMT THIS MMT 701M. PERIUDS FERIUD IV DMT4 PERIOVi PERIOD Tip DATE .UU .a0 .21V �V"N.VN .UN 'sV.ON 1.00 at I.im`1 180N.00 bq� .000 :OVO.Qso .l� 1.U�.+.y�i 1C��:•�k1 :�t Ib-@�:4't� S{y1�:0f� t+d I i v.V6 1:00.00 VV 94".0k; •.„�.00 �.OU ti.lwd .00 e000.Ot' ow•J.t'l` .u'7 b1?.UH .'.tH.V0 .00 fim.0V ww.a <.#...EM+ ',1G.tM1 .VV 0". eU.00 "•.'1' 1 � V IVVU.VV 1t+Cli.ou L+tl 15$011.00 leVi)U.MU 00 JU.UJ IW 3"g.00 Via100 :U Vt+ aft.(KA d0D.�2V 1.U0 K, 1em,go 10004.00 .0k? .VV .00 .VV .Vill .Vw .VU .0N .turf .t41 .00 .eo ..'.� .VV 1.ou VON.\"+! .VV 00 .00 � , ld�d12.HU • 140"Ev • P%E 001-D FLRIUD as 10-V1^H4 TO 10--41-04 Qiy -k10h• WI'i THIS wy TOTAL HIT PRIOR WT TH15 AM! TOTAL PEPI"!ta PERIOD TO DATE PERIODS PERIOD Tfl DPTE .r.' .1V 1.00 84M.00 2000.00 00 1.V!l .w0 1.90 29m.00 .00 e0 1--VO.ON 400.00 AWN.0E+ 64N.00 1600.00 t)+ 9.00 .V0 10L'.00 16"0b .Ve !,Wo.06 b0 :Zoe.VO Wc00.00 .00 $60b.00 .00 kit) c,00V.W0 09 6k Vd.V0 .we DO.uo 6000.00 .00 -0t)0.00 .Qw 1E3C,.0k+ :+`9i1:.toQ 100 3^'I2'. 40 .N0 I VV0.tf0 150oo.00 .00 :t_•e00.00 . .b0 AO.du jow.O0 .00 J900.00 .00 I." 2603.0t: .0V �:;'00.00 .00 1.80 I SON.00 0i+ 10r00.00 1L0E'.b0 I !Ob.U0 .00 12W.00 1<5+9.'lit 4L'O.WV 4VV.0V .00 1.>ZL4.0V I,A10.00 b;6.80 tzl.00 ' .00 SMi8.00 1101v.ge Be 00.00 .QC 690".00 gyp+0.00 ^± l.@,-o e000.00 .00 .. e . 1.00 .00 1900.0iJ . •, .0V 500.0u <:.VO s11NeV.dV BUMERs QFwleKF FORD CONS TiPi-.STA7F ,.�-ON� �J caSGogE ii II a.a.rm aswn // CO CpY,S. •+iC AGP/diY/. •PTK 7 �wn mu _ .w.r»�r �i rn a.tr L..�,uw�mr a1R'a 11111 lair rn sotr IaIOL IIR1gY Yw t �4me.nc.�a .asa�st2aax�„�,r��a;_ten IM�...lipll6- � pT7�fmw !L01:CftllGO0"__.Bsb. 1 M a xc 6afa- vexrcram a 7 --7.AMjrN o�,J4.IJII ti var, Saco �a°ao �ilaRwa" � _f?A>- !/SRC? .�382lalMemal Mwluo 2'l+omrl��lr��&AW.ir nC ( • �.•� t5_ - _ l2TeeFl2Jdt -.a% , !a�/ZaMBr.lQP9l aL?.�.'-'fb. AAft �. 2iII. IZwX&+h 1AI r pf' aut • ° °° aMI'a �; p i Tm Sy6et_ a.s. �+•al t k, ?�N�rff°! a}2cio xaAw. I9J81 al ,_.�(�rT. lAY.M� _,'��._,�.d �,.: y;t/dd:� a�..S.�'• _fff��-- saarearnc a�sae°e /�3+f9.B8 isr6x oo /c I or-7,r soo &IJ[ait[v TAx n,ia�.sa. IA 3i�E6 /S,asv.c5 ib4fAa 9/ ?,�Giiy Bo � ?5,2�/5B _. i msst Bio ns7. sc ff bi/ rF egSY3 os 1220,/oJOf fill BIDDERS BM TABULATION I II- ��v/cEM I f/OIPJ CONS �reli- .5MTTyptiA�, ENGINEF"'S ESTYA B ;I`L'!/ an GO �l,YKS. /i1C. -it XV4T�/Y(5 15' QT/c PINT TOAL MW TOTAL UNf NOp L"T TOTAL MICN IM►TOTAL I7NCl Is"TOTAL -_- NINT TOTAL ProM ow TOTAL NIT IPMC UNIT TOTµ / 5000.00 Qe Ise A22• AQ Ll t-- Z Gcwb— o o P7 m; zTfv Q7 o4k 4 M.- .t22"d3-1�cb.a►� aN t� boo �• :.�� _¢__.__•__ � _ �� fro lA�! 'I eoo _sl . 39cC.cb 4 cb.ao 1d. 00 a0 / .oaf _ i�slr -- s �Pa yaoo moo_ le400_c0 /( 8s. /a, .00 .. B.00. 9,lroo. - 67�50 -% tl.IVAix of< sn Moo 13750.00 ;oaa i35� ee � �,a? S?�7 �� /�000 /OO.00 — d At 1 3a/o. /x4tAW 2is('oB.s� _72,ca VV - -.5 y 6�.SarNSrra1._P.��Lo �2• �1._�$.. _�0.� _- � s"xi 7kcs /o,I.00 3oaaao ' SQ`ltT._SO � � / �' // COW - 16 CM..JW / ao.00 U2sr- ar 3 �Za? _ ,�•o /2,/ploa /c„'/�Ip ZTnrer/,•+s �F� .8:? �13�m �s�� o,2At1►.,14 a.>�m Gr,.�a. lo,Aa.� 52,!a2«i o iIr&v. Z /' " y 7�D.WK Atle +Age14 Cvr�. GJ._B ..�.It.' •.2_ /_3E��. �— —_ ._!?,.�.Q ��' _¢��• T_�ttZ0,2�.:. � BO 16c�ca4G�_:/iil°Cl1t �i25 D.se �ase,ae ----- - �.07 /� - ° - ,'-� Co,.s� Exuma✓' ,.s.Y. ,,/000.o Al fs' I I /•40 , 3SArD, Sfj�, 3sR° 3awe.o J QV ' OdlT.d G"OOG.db i iRQ7 Lb /200,oa, az.ro. 3,000.se (/¢pW. 0640 ----- - - — --�---- J7 c.s. __ 0o n 250. LC O Q1 125D� - 0 — m !217p�_Z/W isos. soao_ o a ao.m /OGH• aj2.N so d o �t�_i_CICt a ^on.o �oce.o 3,Gtb_al 3Lth,oe �__ l/G, 120.0l+ !t ¢,rxM.o. QX 9tAS7a7JIL N /iz,-5so•00 A?. 00 203 6/G /S 29c' /9S OD f3`_S7S40 s./firsrtEs Uxit /a, /67.3o �3, 3/2, z6 /s;Bsr. oS /G 0,e. 9/ 23,64 80 3s28/s8 78TA[ B/o /NW. go; /19, 66/• /� 2//,S�3.oS �?O,/�9.06 13/S, 8G2.da ¢>O, �.sB -_ • �'RVKEV • PHr3E 1101-t1 bWIH IUb!N .-IRLET ShNITHkv UWER Sr;HELULE OF REVENUE ;a IlHI1 bIL W'TV 'UNIT PRIZE TOTHL MAlLleHTluN Ls 1.NN I Moo.00 1000i4.00 �LEMkINr.r+,kULb1tW L', 1.00 [Oow.00 :000.00 5 •sLLL-i bH;A.F ILL I t. QUO+).`_'0 4.V0 isL.1vi.LIU •a tLAMLHT11.1H MHTL TN 600.00 e 40 4804.00 viek btLl 1U oL b TN 1200.00 S.00 9600.00 48" MHNNUtE:i tH `.ve, 1:t90.00 A000.00 MHNHULE E'.XTRH UP-.I VF W.00 I.M.08 b000.00 1`s" -+tA* PM- LF 1246.00 72.00 oVU.00 .Lwbw FiiL LF 1000.00 15.00 15000.00 19" X a" 5LLti tH 30.00 100.60 3000.ov 0WHN. Ili L%:I51. MH tH 1.00 '000.Ou 20U0.00 CONN. TU f$1P,J LM 1." 10000.0W I OEM.00 'af1{Ml UT Uk+o ' ti 1;:+pi,G+ti 1.00 2200.dE N.C. tLHSb b IN 4l+u.00 re2.0N 12800.80 0R)S EU PA* TN tP "-.My 0.00 50".09 k4JHP,:4HV E:r.V �Y 3540.00 2.00 7080.00 ..uNt61 �ItOINl -1 1.00 2"V.00 .10".00 I 'v. M*KL I DAN L Ut+. I ow.ou 1000.U0 iN1aN HNL Ci"EtWk '_:. 1.ok' 700.00 500.0@ --------- ---- __ _ _ _ --------------------------------... a ty i Cu Hi. 195691.1w 15851.03 UTHI [11543.05 . rkUREY • NRGE ON!-8 ' r r'tk;UG M1 dd-1:,-d4 TU O3-J1^t34 tS GT': Rkiurt 0i ...1S +,+TY FOT04L HMT PRIOR AMT THIS AMT 1:+TA1, 'EkIOP' p%v.1 tD TO DATE PERIODS PERIOD TO DATE t .e+�• .8tt .Li0 .till d!tNN.6tf NLOI+.!jd .Ulu I.Od i.NN .'3d 2aO0.k7N iNOO.eO i•+O J 8U .eO .00 r ± OO OO e0 .00 N+± UO ar e0 .00 .0e w .0f0 .v;• .ee .00 .00 .Oki .Oe NSt .O0 Ll* UO .00 Od bN .OO .00 .Ue .N•. .du .ve .Ulu .NU .00 .€0 .0d .00 (dd dN .Nd .ti0 .016 .00 L_ ,00 .OU .OU .00 .ON e® .00 Pod .0e .0e v D iie .00 00 i+e Otl L40 Ov+ .00 t. .u,: 1.00 OO +Uukl.VU 00 .•�'. .su) CIO .UN . ±O IN .00 .00 .00 _-- ^-_-..^_ _._ . SUNR'IHI. .i1N 1:,'e0.08 1.:N0N.:v WInST S. 1% .¢tkl 972.00 • PROPEY • PHC'E 001-C KNI011 M.. 09-lsl Tel 89-30,84 QTY 'wi'.'R (WY THIS UTY 'H'_ HMT PRIOR AMT THIS AM' 10TAL !' PER IAlb VERIUD TO DHTE PERIODS PCPI'JD I", jHTE l Ju .00 au awe.b0 @0 50'10.00 .00 1.eb 200e.00 .89 aR+e.l'tl It,, 4. i e. �' sl il, G ig: .:fir, ?'�' N vl'A: 08 1400,40 120.00 u0 9600.00 9td.06 5.be s.w eti ease.ea 6000.00 �a t4.00 Su.00 .00 6000.00 6000.00 .'+0 1241i.0e 1,:46.06 .00 8?712.00 81.-+712.00 .'ay Oft.so 1900.00 iWOO.00 15009.t10 +v 140.00 3O.1ib 38a0.e0 3000.08 i+ 1.00 i.c1d .V@ "OU0.0u 2elkA.00 au 1.W 1.014 .tki I twu.u9 wev0.00 ,oV .00 .00 .00 .00 .30 1V .80 .NM .00 .00 .ie uU .00 .00 .00 .00 .09 .00 .k' .V? .eli .III tj i.us AW.0b .Ou xUu.ft w .80 .00 .lie .4�H .bb .01i .be --- ----------- �--- - ---- a.!tfll r� IdlY".ee 1413312.00 1b131 u.@t} w.tr" '-• 1:• W2.00 12094.27 Ituca.c! �• i pit 12972.9e i e 14e6.27 174376.0 • lwF-WEV • PRUE 001-D •++ KRIOD t3 *W-W-04 W 10 41.-64 ' d WIV PRILW : ?'+ TH15 f,ITY TOTHL AW PRIOR WT THIS AMT EUi T Tl TOHKRIOD4 -FkiOU TO DRI€ F*RIUD: PEIIOD ! +.2L 00 d 1.tw .00 1.00 96oft.00 .00 i lre'tl.EN+ ak±0.00 2000.00 c400.00 1ti0ti+.00 _ 00 i.U0 xtQ.kle .L'V Cft.k.W l 000,a0 .H0 i b U0.00 '3.0..l t..tie 0 .00 .00 1-0.NN .•3t+ *.H0 oN00.oo .00 5o3o.00 :CQr..vk: .k1+3 1.:4-,.00 e`j71 '.L4i! .W ,:N?,2.00 IUkv.h> ev INC.10 1�0t?0.Oki .00 111000.00 ^• .00 30.00 30013.U0 .00 +0.00 .110 1.We t0U0.00 .00 .0.00 Ilk! 1.0V 10000.00 .00 I k.+V00.00 :taN.M Id00.ev .0y 1 00.00 :"0.A 4k:N.00 4MI.00 .00 I ItAm.00 00 o ;,.00 a.i%N ' .00 30mas 50".00 4t,v*.9V ,ro .00 e'v@0.00 G`L, 1.QU .00 Iow.00 ky0 d« .00 5".00 :0 3.00 _ .__._--_------.. ----- _-..-- 1 1741I0. !3511.00 a0766'.+.V � r OF RF1 � T a�r,1 Z PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT DESIGN/UTILITY ENGINEERING 0 235 263: r� MUNICIPAL SUII_DiNO 200 MILL AVE.SO RENTON,WASH.aeD66 b f rro SEPIt� BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR September 13. 1984 Mr. Rudy J. Starkovich 12014 - 87th Avenue South Seattle, MA 98178 Subject: South Tobin St. •nitary Serer Easement Dear Rudy: Enclosed is a recorded Lop�r of u -, referenced easement for your flee. If you have any Ruastk.ns, Please call me at the above number. Very truly yours, Robert L. gray Project Engineer :jft Enclosure P 707 975 , S � "j C. J. MCGERRY CO. Sept. 17, 1984 'r Nuftlbin0 & N*aanp . Ratau. O 7614 I6TH AVENUE S.E TELEPHONNE(20 )228�y7 City of Renton 200 Mill Ave. South Renton, MA 98055 Dear Sir or Madam: This letter to to give the City of Renton notice that I be filing a claim agdinat said City for damages to my will busine as caused by sever construction work at 75 Burnett South in Penton. Because of the nature of the work and the street and access being torn up I have been locked out of my business establishment for the past thirty days, since no excess have been provided, and the utilities have been di:connected for the sane period of time. furthermore I was given nr notice that this work was going to be done or when It wo�ild take place. The first I was to realize of it wav when I saw the machinery move in on the pn -ty and start trenching. I have not yet completely been able to calculate the amount of damages since they are still working on the pruperty. Also the amounts for any lost business and inconvenience due to this work. Also have they not rely not given me any notice of when this work was to start , but they have not given me a date when they will be finished, so I may once ag^in start normal business operations. This letter will also corroberate a verbal claim mad,. -y Rudy Sterkovich and myself In the City Engineers Office two weeks ago to Robert E Bergstrom. f� o Very truly yours, L4-� 1L '04 O Cliff rd McGarry CITY CLERK of RQ PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT RICHARD C. HGUCHTOM1 • DIRECTOR o ✓� MUNICIPA 4UILDING 200 MIL LAVE FO. RENTON.WASH.eeOaa S�TED sEpT Eoe 4 Pb 206 235.2569 BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH \optrmher 1. 1984 MAYOR Ford Construction Co. P. 0. Box 503b Kent, VA 98064 SUBJECT, South Tobin St. Sanitary Sewer, Work Progress Gertlemen, Tiis letter is to serve notice that this office is not satisfied with the progress, or the method of prosecution of the referenced contract. In accordance with the contract specifications it is the contractor's responsibility to provide sufficient manpower and equipment to perform the work In a safe and professional manner within the time stipulated in the contract. It is apparent from the work so for that the proper equip- ment and sufficient manpower are not being utilized. The excess time to make the Initial tie-in to the Metro trunkline is resulting in increased costs and inconvenience to the City as well as creating a safety hazard to the public. This office has received complaints from McGarry Plumbing about broken sewer services, broken electrical services and Icss of business duo So your operation. They also complained of not being nntifiod in advance of construction. Henceforth you will by expectec to per,orm all work in accurdance with the specifications and to pursue the completion of the project within the contract time lim;t. Ali orders Issued by the City inspector shall be carried out as soon as possible. Any deviation from the specifications shall be duly noted and a correction notice or a stop work order will be Issued. Should you have any questions, please toll me at the above number. Ford Construction _p_ September 4, 1964 All of these Items were a scusssd with you at our meeting on September etA 1984. Very truly yours, ,i144, Richard C. Houghton Pu21ic WorkS Director RD:pmp OF REM o PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT o _ DESIGN/UTILITY ENGINEEP!NG 235 2631 f z r' AVMUNICIPAL BUILDING mo MILL A\'.SO. RENTON,WASN.eeo66 9 9g94 Tf0 SEPte0'0Pb BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH September 10, 1984 MAYOR Ford Constr ction Co. P.O. Box 6289 Federal Way WA 3BG63 Subject: South Tobin Street Sanitary Sewer Gentlemen: On September 10, 1984, a speed letter was giv-n to your foreman in the field directing that all pipe laying operations cease after the sewer is installed across the Starkovich uroperty, -.;ntil such time that all restoration was completed, including building repairs, plumbing and electrical repairs, parking lot paving and incidental repairs. At a subsequent meeting with the Office Engineer, September 13, 1984, you were directed to perform the restora- tion adjacent to McGerry's Plumbing Office when sufficient pipe was layed past the building. You were directed to restore the property to its original con- dition in order that McGerry's Plumoinq could resume normal business activities. At the end of the working day, Friday, September 14, 198r your foreman was instructed that sufficient pipe had been laved to permi -estoration an,, that no more pipe was to be installed until the. restoration had been completed. At 7:30 A.M. , Monday, September 17, 1984, the City Inspector reported the crew was excavating in preparation for laying pipe. The Inspector was directed to post a Stop Work Order until the matter was 1•esclved. When the crew showed indications of ignoring the Stop Work Order, a p, '-e officer was rel,uested ! assist in enforcing the oraar. The Project Engineer visited the site at 9:00 A.M. and you agreed to proceed with the restoration work and to secure the pipe installation operation until the restoration was completed. The Stop Work Order was then withdrawn and you were allowed to proceed. You are advised that any future issuance of a Stop Work Order will result in suspension of all work activities-upon completion of securing the site-until Ford Construction Co. September 15, 1984 Page 2. ordered in writing by the Public Works Director that you may resume work. Any correction notice or directive that is not complied with immediately will result In a Stop Work Order. Should you have any questions, please call me at 235-2631. Very truly yours, A I " ,' e ay Project Engineer •ckd pF RF v ti� PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT RICHABC C HOI1CvTOH • DIRECTDR O hrJNICIPAL BUILDING 30014LL AVL SO RENION,WASH,SIM 9 a �Er 206 23b•669 )ED �Pt EV" BARBARA Y. SHiNPOCH ieptember 18, 1984 11i Ford Cons!ruction Company P. 0. Box 5036 Kent WA 98M 'L*JECTI Bid Award, Sewer Rehab Contract Gentlemen, This letter is to notify you that because of unsatisfactory work parfor- a nce on the presen, contract you hold with the City, the Tobin Street Sanitary Sewers, I am unable to recommend your company for the abovc referenced contract. The lack of progrwss on this project with the City and the fart that you are not going to be able to complete this Project within the time stipulated leads the C,ty to the conclusion that you would not be able to perform on the above referenced project. You were advised vwsbaily as well as formally (by letter) of our concerns relaflve your work performance on September 4, 1984. Very truly yours. 0 chat rd C. i gnto, Public Works Director RCH:PNP cccl City Clark City Attorney OF RF • • O PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT U 2 _ OESIGN/UTILITY ENGINEERING r 235-2631 z MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 Mlll AVE.S( 1ENTON WASH.9ab156 9q o' llfb Sl Pt Ems` BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR September 24, 19B4 C. J. Mc Gerry Co. 7614 - 116th Ave. S.E. Ilenton, WA 98D55 Subject: South Tobin St. Sanitary Serer - Restoration Dear Mr. Mc Gerry: This letter is to confinn our conversation this date at your place of business at Burnett Ave. S. and S. Tobin St., at which you stated that you were satisfied with the restoration that has, so far, been done and that you are able to resume your normal business. The paving has been completed to the west end of )uur building and the sanitary sewer and 4lectrical services have been recannected. One remaining item is the railruad tie planter which ,you stated you would Inform the contractor later if you decide you want it replaced. Your patience is requested during the remaining work across your business property. If any problem shocld arise, please call me inmedietely at 235.26.1. Very truly yours, Robert L. bray Project Engineer MEMORANDUM 'to Bob Bergstrom DATE 9I20184 FROM Jane Mauch SIIR.IECT Attached letter from Clifford McGer y (C. J. %1cGerry Company) _ Bob, The attached letter notifies us of a pending claim for damages from Clifford McGarry, He mentions that he and a Rudy Starkovich discussed this matter with you. Would you please send me a report to be forwarded to the insurance service and City Attorney's office with any details you might have on this issue.... .....Is this a City project or something being done by an independent contractor?... .Are his allegations true in your opinion? Anything you can do to shed some light on the claim will be most helpful, T h.,.,ik Bob. _ ,` 11 . cc: Dick Houghton Mark Hennessy Larry Warred e g�p�o P 707 975 3 !JR?6ENTON . J. McuERRY CO. mtun a t Nunp • spaysSept. 17, 1984 14 - Ris- t AVENUE S.E WA iHINGTON s605$ LEPHONE (20) 228-3172 City of Renton 200 Mill Ave. South Renton, WA 98055 Dear Sir or Madam: ".'his letter :s to give the City of Renton notice that will be .4 , inv laim against said Citv for damages to ■y business caused by newer construction work at 75 Burnet South in Ire,., . . Because of tb= nature c the work ani the street and access tieing torn up I have been locked out of my business establishment for the past thirty days, since no access have been provided, and the utilities have been disconne ,ted for the same period of time. Furthermore I was given n,. notice that this work vas going to he done of when it would take place. The first I was to realize of it was when I saw the machinery move in on the property and ttart trenching. I have not yet completely been able to calculate the , mount of damages since they are still working on the property. Also the amounts for any lost business and inconvenie ce due to this wrrk. Also have they not only not given me a y notice of when this work was to :tart , but -hey have lot. given me a date when they will he finished, so I may , ace again start normal business npe bons. This letter will also corroberate a verbal claim made by Rudy Starkovich and myself in the City Engineers Off;ct two weeks ago to Robert E Bergstrom. Very trulv yours, cliff A rd McGarry`!Y^ S�f Q LL ,col CITY CLERK S. Tobin St. Sanitary Sewer Correspondence =2 ^� 2 OF RFM u x PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT _ DESIGN/UTILITY ENGINEERING 0 235-2631 � F MUNICIPAL BUILDING xoo MILL AVE.SO. RENTUN,WASH.98066 0 �P Co SEP,E� BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR September 24, 1984 Ford Construction Co., Inc. P.O. Box 5036 Kent, WA 98064 Subject: South Tobin St. unitary Sewer Improvements Gentlemen: At 10:00 a.m. this date a correction notice was issued to your foreman directing him to dewater the sewer trench in accordance with the specifications. After failing to comply with the correction notice, a stop work order was issued at 1:30 p.m. In accordance with Section 61-3.02 of the Standard Specifications, "the contractor shall furnish, install and operate all necessary equipment to keep excavations above the foundation level free from water during construction --- The stop work order will remain in en act until all requirements of the correction notice are met. If you have any questions, please call me at the above number. Very truly yours, Robert L. Bray Project Engineer :jft Y} ENDING FILE TITLE MEN i 9