HomeMy WebLinkAboutWWP2701999(34) 10 :1
r
Appraisal of
Land Values
within the boundaries
of Renton Local Improvement District No. 314
Made for
The City of Renton
As of
January 11, 1481
by
J. Ralph Cilbo
Real Estate Apprsiser and Consultant
J. Ralph Gilbo
Mai Estate Appraiser i Consultent _
1130N 93rd STREET
St4TTLE.W&ISHINGTON 90103
PHONE. QOM 5:31143
January 11, 1983.
Mr. Lawrence J. Warren
City Attorney, City of Renton
100 South Second Street
Post Office Box 626
Renton, Washington, 98051
Dear Mr. Warren:
As you requested, I have made an appraisal of the
effects on land values of real estate within the boundaries
cf Renton Local Improvement District No. 314.
I certify that a complete and thorough investigation
has been made, including an inspection of the subject prop-
erties and other properties that have recently sold, are
located in comparable nearby areas, and are sufficiently
comparable to qive an indication of the effect on fair
market values in the L.I.D. 314 area.
It is my opinion that the values are:
Value before L.I.D. 314 improvements 51.94/SF
Value after L.I.D. 314 improvements $3.13/SF
Total benefit to land (difference) PLUS $1.19/9F
Total benefits to land $1.19/SF
Estimated a,.eraae cost of L.I.D. 314 $0.51/SF
Total benefits in excess of cost $0.68/SF
Very truly yours,
J. Ralph Gilbo
C&^If ICATION
The author does hereby certify that, except as otherwise
noted in this report:
1. I have no present or contemplated future interest in
the real estate included in this report.
2. I have no personal interest or bias with respect to the
subject matter of this report or the parties involved.
3. To the best of my knowledge and belief the statements of
fact contained in this report upon which the analyses,
opinions, and conclusions expressed herein are based,
are true and correct.
i. No one other than the author prepared the analyses,
conclusions, and opinions concerning real estate that
are set forth in this report.
2
PURPOSE OF APPRAISAL
The purpose of +his report is to advise the City of
Renton of the typical fair racket value of the land in the
area encompassed by Local Improvement District No. 314.
First is to determine the typical fair market value of the
land without the improvements of L.I.D. 314 (referred to as
the before situation) , and second to determine the fair
market value of the land with all the L.I.D. 314 improve-
ments completed (referred to as the af.er situation) .
The difference between the two values is considered
to be a special benefit to the land so improved.
Fair market value is the amount in cash which a well-
informed buvar willinr„ but not oblined to buy the property,
would pay, and which a well-informed e,eller, willing but not
oblioated to sell it, would accept, taking into consideration
all uses to which the property is adapted and might in reason
be applied.
VALUATION OF LAND
Fair market value sales of land comparable to the land
in the L.T.D. 314 area have been used to determine the before
and after values. All tales were analyzed as to their street
and utility improvements at the time of the sale. These were
separated into two groups, one with improvements as represent-
ative as possible of the before L.I.D. 114 situation, and the
other of the after L.I.D. 314 situation.
The highest and best use of all but a small portion of
the land in the subject area is for those uses compatible
with the specific zoning, Generelly these uses are offices
and industrial activities of hinh operational, development
and environmental standards.
The highest and best use o° -`e land on the east side of
East Valley Road south of Jonathan's Storaae (Parcel 44) is
for commercial business.
The hxnhest and best use of the property on the east side
of East Valley Road from Parcel 44 northerly to The Lumber
Market (Parcel 33) is as improved. Benefits to these properties
from the L.I.D. 314 improvements would be below the average
found in this report, as would the small sites along S.W. 16th
Street at the northern part of the project .
3
The major qualifying factors for consideration in
the selection of a light industrial location are:
1. Fire protection service.
2. Security enforcement or police.
1 Adequacy of water, sewer, storm sewer, utilities, etc.
1. Ease of access to plant by truck or auto.
S. The condition of streets and nearby highways.
6. Employee accessibility.
1. Transportation: roads, highways, railroads, and air.
B. Proximity to principal markets.
9. Attractiveness of site.
10. Customer and employee off-site and on-site parking.
11. Labor.
12. Availability of suitable site.
11. Local tax climate.
14. Plannin, and zonino.
15 Local government reputation.
These factor• are relative, comparative, and competitive.
The more positive these factors are, the more desireability,
therefore, the higher the land value. This is clearly indi-
cated by a study of the location and features possessed by
the comparable sales.
4
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS
73 sales were selected for analysis and comparison to
land in the L.I.D. 314 area. 47 of the sales were judged
to be more comparable to the subject land in the before
situation. These are referred to as before comparable atlas.
26 of th- sales most •epresent the subject land in the after
situation and are called after comparable sales.
None of the bef ,re sales have '.roth sanitary sewers ari
storm sewers. This in typical of the subject •tie b• Ja
L.I.D. 114. All of the after sales have both sanitary sewers
and storm sewers as in the subject area after L.I.D. 314.
The comparable sales were segregated in this manner.
The only sales occurzinq in the study area that were
purposely omitted were property transfers which involved a
trade, were between corporate affiliates or relatives, or
were a land assemblaae. These are suspect as to the price
being fair market value. To the knowledge of this appraiser
all other recent sales are included and considered.
A stud., of the sales and their off-si. improvements
indicates the most consequential improvement possessed by the
higher-priced after sales and absent in the before sales is a
storm sewer and its appurtenant curbs and gutter.
Adequate storm sewers make possible the full and complete
use of the land. A portion of the land may otherwise be
required to be used for costly on-site storm retention systems,
a somei ;mes possible secondary or temporary solution. These
systems are not popular as they are an economically unproduct-
ive use of land, cost money to desinn, build, and landscape,
and require permanent maintenance. Even with on-site storm
retention systems water from other lands may cause serious
flooding to the property, its structures, and access streets.
This is an important factor considered by all prudent land
users and influences value. Lack of adequate area-wide storm
sewers does more to inhibit development in the Renton-Kent
Valley study area than any single factor. This is evidenced
by the hiqher average sales prices of the after sales.
mrst of the after sales are also improved with sidewalks,
underaround power, and street 'ightinq as in the after L.I .D.
314 situation. These are the functional and attractive dress-
inq of a superior neiohborhood commanding the highest prices.
These improvements are relatively inexpensive and add a great
measure of safety and security to the district.
S
An analysis of comparable sales 61 and 69 is pertinent
and revealina. Both occurred in December, 1979, the purch-
asers having knowledge of the effect of the L.I.D. 302
improvements and the assessments. Glacier Park Co. sold
both tracts. Sale 61 sold for $1.39/SF and Sale 69 for
$2.65/SF.
Sale 61 was assessed $272,530 total for both S.N. 34th
St. and Lind Avenue S.N. , which totals $702,715 for the
purchase price together with the assessments, or $2.27/SF.
Sale 69 was assessed $188,230 total for both S.N. 4ist St.
and Lind Avenue S.N. , which totals $757,030, or $3.53/SF.
The original purchase price represents a 1979 before
value. It was apparently considered by the purchasers that
the improvements would appreciate the value of the land at
least by the amount of the assessment. This judgement proved
correct as loth tracts if vacant and available today would
sell for $3.50 to $4.00/SF, or in the upper range of the
after comparable sales.
Comparable Sales 62, 65. and 67 are also important.
The)• are all in the L.I.D. 314 area and were sold in a two
month period from December, 1981 to February, 1992. Two were
purchased by BNL Development Corporation. Prices paid were
$1.41/SF, $1.93/SF, and $2.27/SF respectively and are used
herein as comparable sales. Adding the estimated assessments,
of which they were &ware, the purchase price and the estimated
as:-.t,ssments will increase the total price paid to $2.04/SF,
$2. 38/SF, and $2.65/SF. These values or tracts completely
improved are considerably below the present fair market value
for land with comparable improvements, as indicated by the
after comparable sales.
6
CORRELATION - BEFORE VALVE
Because this report is an appraisal of the typical or
average difference in land value due to the impact of L.I.D.
31,4, and not an appraisal of the value of individual parcels,
the averages of a large amount of Was data are considered
to be accurate and conclusive evidence of value.
The 47 before sales used in this study indicate a range
in value from 50.69/SF to SI.oS/SF. 'tie evrrara
price of the before comparable a-:a< ., 6i
In objectively refining this estimate of vaiue a number
of sales could be omitted to reflect sales With only the
improved characteristics of the subject properties.
1 . Omit Sale 39 from consideration as reliesentina an
exceptionally low price, not appropriate for comp-
arison to land in the sub+ect area.
2. Omit Sales 40 and 54 of Earlino•on Golf Course land
because they have no sutstantial improved rontar»s
and will require cvvplete internal develorment
1. Omit Sales 4, 6. 7, B, and 11 as they have no vea
street,
4. Omit Sales 1, 12, 41, 49, and 52 as they have no
sanitary sewer.
Having eliminated these sales from consideration the
remaining 14 sales, all of which have paved streets and
sanitary sever, range in value from a low of S0.90/Sr for
Sale 40 to a high of $3.05/51, for Sale 23. These sate:
indicate an average value of $1.9VSF for land comparable
to the before L.I.D. 314 situation.
Tair average is almost exactly the average of the sale
prices of Sales 61, 62, 65, 67. and 64 which are in or
adjarent to L.I.D. 314 and ars considered the most comparable
sales. These average S1.93/SF.
The indicated value of typical land in the L.I.D. 314
area in the before situation is $1.94/SF.
7
CORRELATION - Af TER VALUE
TLe 26 after sales „aed in th.a study tndtcate a
range in value from a low of $2.20/SF fur Sale 21 to a
hiqh of $1.66/SF for Sale 73. All are qood comparable
sales and are appropriate for use in this study. These
sales averane $3.13,'SF, the indicated value of typical
land in the L.I .D. 314 area after the improvements are
completed.
CONCLUS"ON
Value before L.I.D. 314 improvements $1 .91/SF
Value after L.I.D. 114 improvements $3.13/SF
Total benefits to land (d Werencei , LUS $1.19!SF
The present estimated cost c' f (.D. 314 (not final)
is $6,216,519. -here are 12,163,i,' square feet of land
to be assessed. Thurefore, the es umated cost averages
slint,tly over $0.51'SF.
Total benefits to land $1.19/SF
Less estimated averane cost of L.I.D. 310 0.51/SF
Estimated benefits to land in excess of cost $u.68/SF
B
SALES NOT USED
Salas 74 and 75. which are included in the comparable
sales herein, are not :sad bechume they are sales of intensive
cnmme, ial business proper 'at and are not considered to be
representative of the general land values in the LID 314 area.
The following properr' transfers are not used in this
st..dy as they ware invohrj in trades or were between corpor-
ate affiliates or relatives.
NE 11-22-4 Plaza, Inc./Towne. Dev. E623176 $2,600,000
NE 13-22-4 ERPDCO/, —t Highlands 577027 582,365
HE ' 3-22-4 Golden Gr, n/Fisher 596417 1,952,000
SW i5-23-4 Auto ^hlor,Heints Const. 632963 569,000
NW 25-23-4 Rainier/AF. Prop 675439 598,658
Sw 36-23-4 Peerage/Corp Prop 674158 1,001,858
NW 36-23-4 Hudcor/Roberts 607331 311,765
Kw 36-23-4 Cam Prop/Heinen 591085 27,225
SW 6-22-5 Nowatny/Boise Cascade 653629 239,760
Sw 19-21-5 Metro/NW Coml RF 554006 1,701,791
9
ASSUMPTIONS AND LIMITING CONDITIONS
1. All dimensions and local descriptions are assumed to
be correct as found throueh inspection of available
records.
2. The information used in the data furnished is considered
to be reliable. If any errors in this report are found,
the right is reserved to modify the conclusions reached.
3. Lmployment to make this report does not require testimony
in court or any public or ether hearinc as an expert wit-
ness unless mutuallg satisfactory arrangements are made
in advance.
1. Neither the employment to make this analysis nor the
compensation is contineent upon the conclusions.
10
L. I.D. 40. 314 HILFaTONES
Initial Resolution No, 2283 7/2/79
Second Resolution 2299 9/24/79
first Public Hearing 10/15/79
Second Public Nearing II/5/79
Ordinance No. 3396 1/" ./80
Amunt of Preliminary Assessment Roll Sf,236,538.56
Start of Constriction 7/6/62
Comp!etlon of Construction 2/7/84
Acceptance of Project 2/27/84
final Public Hearing 4/9/04
Mount of Final Assessment $6,969.113.60
FINAL COSTS
Engineering and Administration $1.066,482.07
Finance Costs $ 16.510.00
Interim Financing $ 793,524.57
Bond Discount and RegIvration $ 290.889.40
, Ity Clerk S I,391.20
Utility Division S 2,936.32
Right-of-May S 506,714,66
M torney's Fees $ 6, 15.30
Subtotal Administration cost 52.686.963-52
Construction Cost $4,282,150.08
TOTAL COST TO I.I .D. s6,969,113.60
L.I.D. 0314
EAST VALLEY ROAD
From S.M. 16th St, to S.M. 41st St.
and Related Streets
PRELIMINARY PRELIMINARY FINAL
NAME PARCEL r COST i PARCEL a FINAL COST
MacGregor, Robert S. 1 13,456.% 1 10.276.11
Dave 6 Swede's Service 2 3S,510.03 2 22.517.05
Davis, Charles N. A Pamela A. 3 28,806.67 3 18,105.10
Hardebeck, Jerry L. 4 25.799.75 4 16,166,8,'.
Hardebeck, Jerry L. 5 19,046.57 5 12,184.65
Hardeb•ck, Jerry L. SA 8,801.60 6 5,633.38
Valley Office 4 Industrial Park b 748,721.00 7 886,623.34
Valley Office A Industrial Park 7 37.289,69 8 34,588.07
Valley Office 6 Industrial Park 8 6,954.46 9 4.743.67
Bailey, P.G. 6 Monnahan, A.F. 9 14,355.85 10 22,445.15
Prudential Ins. Co, of America 10 98,229.99 11 114,9' .41
BEMP Associates 11 103,700.46 17 135,066.16
12
City of Renton 13 104,664.21 13 128,398.13
Valley Office 5 industrial Park 14 96,895.29 14 106,515.84
Valley Office A Industrial Park 15 132,452.35 15 134,333.52
Pace Industrial Gruup 16 46,145.14 16 43,544,42
Pace industrial Group 17 55,489.70 17 57,210.54
Olympic Pipeline Co. 18 18
Puget Sound Power 6 Light Co. 19 561.830.99 19 630,357.23
20
21
Mool Oil Corporation 22 222.297.33 20 240,814.25
Burlington Northern Inc. 23A 134,320,39 21 154,506.88
Burlington Northern Inc. 23B 138.802.26 22 158.513.99
Burlington Northern 24A 128,640.58 23 119,600.94
Glacier Park Co. 248-2 84,634.20 24 78.325.69
Puqet Sound Power 6 Light Cc 248-1 27,198.31 25 25070.83
Glacier Park Co_ 24C 112,792.50 26 104,384.90
Garfield A Associates ltd. 24D 38,582.37 27 98,441,27
1 of
L.1.D._0314
EAST VALLEY ^ROAD
From S.W. 16th St. to S.M. 41st St.
and Related Streets
PRELIMINARY PRELIMINARY FINAL
NAME PARCEL a .__COST PARCEL a FINAL COST.
Kuopp-Castro Orillia 24-E 4,950.20 29 121630,20
24-F
24-G
Knopp-Castro Orillia 24-H 4,360.38 29 11,125.33
Garfield 4 Associates Ltd. 24.1 38,089.83 30 97,184,57
Burlinqton Northern 24-J 89.444.35 31 106.324,42
Burlington Northern 24-K 86,718.33 32 99,369,12
Glacier Park Co. 24-L 84,510.97 33 96,839.71
Glacier Park Co. E4-M `1 ,835.56 34 86,835.92
Glacier Park Co. 24-N 183,011..36 35 213,559.46
Glacier Park Co. 24-0 83,661.00 36 97,627.18
Glacier Park Co. 24-P 48,628.39 37 56,745,RO
Prudential ins. Co. 24-0 1,287,60 38 3,285.33
Glacier Park Co. 244 1,400.80 39 3,574,08
Glacier Park Co. 24-5 2,992 X 40 7,635.03
24-T
Glacier Park Co. 244 15,075.67 41 38.464.94
25
City of Renton 26 324,799.57 42 372,182,43
27
28
Broadacres, Inc. 29 179,503.81 43 457,9%.26
Puget Sound Paer 6 Light Co. 30 44
Olymoic Pipeline Co. 31 .ih
Gary Merlin Construction Co. 32 218,018.76 46 97,424.00
Hawk Joint Owners 33 36,423.49 47 12,154.22
Hawk Joint Owners 34 44,940.95 48 15,552.83
Hawk Joint Owners 35 35,634.60 49 14,368.67
Hawk Joint Owners 36 13,087.45 50 3,167.82
Younker, Rhonda 37 37,12731 51 13,678.76
Merlin Construction Co. 38 118,292.71 52 44,600.99
2 of
L.1.0. 0314
EAST VALLEY ROAD
From S.M. 16th St. to S.M, 41st St.
and Related Streets
PRELIMINAFY PRELIMINARY FINAL
NAIE PARCEL a COST _ PARCEL i FINAL t ,ST
Craig Taylor Equipment Co. 39 68,488.52 53 27,899.90
Craig Taylor Equipment ro. 40 13,241.41 54 3,512.78
Kohl, Delores (Ms) 41 811950.59 55 31,526.50
Magnuson, N.A. 42 113,814.14 56 43,286.23
Pierotti, Emilio 43 45,172.04 57 16,866.61
Jonatnans Renton Partnership 44 %,625.10 58 35,CIS,74
Seattle Eye Bldg, Corp. 45-A 38.456.86 59 12,825.12
Allenbach, Herman M. 45-B 36.527.00 60 12.362.59
Allenbach, Herman M. 45-C 39,641.04 61 13,354.36
Younker, Sam 46 40,167.56 62 12,426,46
Younker, Sam 47 30,994,3S 63 8,046.20
Morrison, S.E. 48 6.503.14 64 6,682.93
Cook, M.L. 49 4,287.10 65 3,911.99
Hardebeck, Jerry L. 50 8,134.98 66 8,601.36
Harper A Tripp 51 280,939.51 67 104,341.92
Glacier Park Co. 52 179,492.77 68 201,788.21
rirOUp Health Corp, of Puget Sound 53 69
Broadacres Inc. 54 70
Valley Office 6 Inc. Park Inc. 55 71
Valley Office b Intl. Part Inc. 56 72
57
58
59
Thomas A. 0ah1by 60 1.156.49 73 983,58
Thomas R. Dahlby 61 1,536.47 74 1,306.75
Shohen LID 62 3,139.05 75 2,669.72
Shohen ITO 63 3.139.05 76 2,669.72
64
65
MLintyre, Patricia Ann 66 7.517.19 77 6,393.26
3of4
L.I,O, 0314
EAST VALLEY ROAD
From S.M. 16th St. to S.M. 41st St.
and Related Streets
PRELIMINARY PRELIMINARY FINAL
NAME PARCEL / COST PARCEL 0 FINAL COST
Sexton, Richard J. 67 1,672.77 78 1.422.68
McIntyre, Patricia Ann 68 3,221.65 79 2,739.97
Powers, Frank 6 John 69 3,221.65 80 2,739.97
Powers, Frank 8 John 70 2,980.02 81 2.534.47
Valley Office a Ind. Park Inc. 71 39.248.05 82 00,551.95
Martin Seeliq 72 5,976.61 83 12,272.47
Martin Seelig 73 43.999.11 84 90.303.04
Olympic Pipeline Co. 74 15,147.96 85 38,649.36
Harper, J.F. 6 Tripp, J.W. 75 6,362.76 86 16,234.31
Harper, J.F, a Tripp. J.W. 76 20.148.75 87 51,408.66
Burlington Nrothern Inc. 77 5,885.71 88 15,017.13
Broadacres Inc. 78 101,605.94 89 259.243.16
Broadacres Inc. 79 91,445.34 90 233,'18.85
Washinqton Jockey Club 80 33.868.66 91 86,414.39
Cook, Walter L. 81 1,610.82 92 4,109.95
4of4
Appraisal of
Land Values
within the boundaries
of Renton Local Improvemant District No. 314
Made for
The City of Rentor
As of
January 11 , 1483
by
J, Ralph Gilbo
Real Estate Appraiser and Consultant
J. Ralph Gilbo
Real Estate Appraiser a Consultant
I I 511 N 91d STREET
St.ATTLE. WASHINGTON 99101
PHONE (206)523-1143
January 11, 1993.
Mr. Lawrence J. Warren
City Attorney, City of Renton
100 South Second Street
Post Office Box 626
Renton, Washiniton, 99057
Dear Mr. Warren:
As you requested, I have made an appraisal of the
effects on land values of real estate within the boundaries
of Renton Local Improvement District No. 314.
I certify that a complete and thorough investigation
has been made, including an inspection of the subject prop-
erties and other properties that have recently sold, are
located in comparable nearby areas, and are sufficiently
comparable to cive an indication of the effect on fair
market values in the L.I.D. 314 area.
It is my opinion that the values are:
Value before L.I.D. 314 improvements S1.94/SF
Value after L.I.D. 314 improvements $3.13iSF
Total benefit to land (difference) PLUS $1.19/SF
Total benefits to land $1.19/SF
Estimated averace cost of L.I.D. 314 $0.51/SF
Total benefits in excess of coat $0.68/SF
very truly yours,
r
J. Ralph Gilbo
CERTIFICATION
The author does hereby certify that, except as otherwise
noted in this reports
1. I have no present or contemplate'. future interest in
the real estate included in this report.
i. I have no personal interest or bias with respect to the
subject matter of this report or the parties involved.
3 To the best of my knowledge and belief the statements of
fact contained in this report upon which the analyses,
opinions, and conclusions expressed herein are based,
are true and correct.
4. No one other than the author prepared the analyses,
conclusions, and opinions concernine real estate that
are set forth in this report.
2
PURPOSE OF APPRAISAL
The purpose of 'his report is to advise the City of
Renton of the typical fair market value of the land in the
area encompassed by Local Improvexnt District No. 314.
First is to determine the typical fair market value of the
land without the improvements of L.S.D. 331 (referred to is
the before situation) , and second to determine the fair
market value of the land with all the L.I.D. 314 improve-
ments completed (referred to as the after situation) .
The difference between the two values is considered
to be a special benefit to the land so improved.
Fair market value is the amount in cash which a well-
informed buyer willing, but not oblined to buy the property,
would pay, and which a well-informed seller, willina but not
oblicated to sell it, would accept, taking into consideration
all uses to which the property is adapted and might in reason
be applied.
VALUATION OF LAND
Fair marset value sales of land comparable to the land
in the L.I.D. 314 area have been used to determine the before
and after values. All sales were analyzed as to their street
and utility improvements at the time of the sale. These were
separated into turo croups, one with improvements as represent-
ative as possible of the before L.I.D. 314 situation, and the
other of the after L.I.D. 314 situation.
The highest and best use of all but a small portion of
the land in the subject area is for those uses compatible
with the specific zonino. Generally these uses are offices
and industrial activities of hinh operational , development
and environmental staneards.
The highest and best use of the land on the east side of
East Valley Road south of Jonathan's Storane (Pay-el 14) is
for commercial business.
The h+ghe _ and best use of the property on the east side
of East Valley Road from Parcel 40 northerly to The Lumber
Market (Parcel 33) is as improved. Benefits to these properties
from the L.I.D. 314 improvements would be below the average
found in this report, as would the small sites along S.N. 16th
Street at the northern part of the project.
3
The major qualifying factors for consideration in
the selection of a linht ind'istrial location are:
1. Fire protection service.
2. Security enforcement or police.
3. Adequacy of water, sewer, storm sewer, utilities, etc.
4. Ease of access to plant by truck or a:)to.
5. The condition of streets and nearby hiqhways.
6. Employee accessibility.
7. Transportation: roads, highways, railroads, and air.
B. Proximity to principal markets.
4. Attractiveness of site.
In. Customer and employee off-site and on-site parking.
11 . Labor.
12. Availability of suitable site.
13. Local tax climate.
14. Plannino and zoning.
15, Local government reputation.
These factors are relative, comparative, and competitive.
The more positive these factors are, the more desireability,
therefore, the higher the land value. This is clearly indi-
cated by a study of the location and features possessed by
the comparable sales.
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS
73 sales were selected for analysis and comparir-n to
land in the L.I.D. 314 area. 47 of the sales were judged
to be mure comparable to the subject land in the before
situation. These are referred to as before comparable sales.
26 of the sales most represent the subject land in the after
situation and are called after comparable sales.
None of the before sales have both sanitary sewers and
•corm sewers. This is typical of the subject area before
L.I.D. 314. All of the after sales have both sanitary sewers
and storm sewers as in the subject area after L.I.D. 314.
The comparable sales were segregated in this manner.
The only sales occurring in the study area that were
purposely omitted were property transfers which involved a
trade, were between corporate affiliates or relatives, or
were a land assemblage. These are suspect as to the price
beinq fair market value. To the knowledge of this appraiser
all other recent sales are included and considered.
A study of the sales and their off-site improvements
indicates the most consequential improvement possessed by the
hiqher-priced after sales and absent in the before sales is a
storm sewer and its appurtenant curbs and gutter.
Ade uate storm sewers make possible the full and complete
use of tL- land. A portion of the land may otherwise be
required to be used for costly on-site storm retention systems,
a sometimes possible secondary or temporary solution. These
systems are not popular as they are an economically unproduct-
ive use of land, cost money to design, build, and landscape,
and require permanent maintenance:. Even with on-site storm
retention systems water from other lands may cause serious
flooding to the property, its structures, and access streets.
This is an important factor considered by all prudent land
users and influences value. Lack of adequate area-wide storm
sewers does more to inhibit development in the Renton-Kent
Valley study area than any single factor. This is evidenced
by the higher average sales prices of the after sales.
Most of the after sales are also improved with sidewalks,
underground powc: . and street liqhtinq as in the after L.I.D.
314 situation. There are the functional and attractive dress-
inq of a superior neighborhood commandinq the highest prices.
These improvements are relatively inexpensive and add a great
measure of safety and security to the district.
5
An analysis of comparable sales 61 and 69 is pertinent
and revealinq. Roth occurred in December, 1979, the pur-h-
asers having knowledoe of the effect of the L.I.D. 302
improvements and the assessments, Glacier Park Co. sold
both tracts. Sale 61 sold for $1.39/SF and Sale 69 for
$2.65/SF.
Sale 61 was assessed $272,530 total for both S.W. 34th
St. and Lind Avenue S.W. , which totals $702,715 for the
purchase price together with the assessments, or S2.27/SF.
Sale 69 was assessed $188,230 total for both S.W. 41st St.
and Lind Avenue S.W. , which totals $757,030, or $3.53/SF.
The original purchase price represents a 1979 before
value. It was apparently considered by the purchasers that
the improvements would appreciate the value of the land at
least by the amount of the assessment. This judgement proved
correct as both tracts if vacant and available today would
well for $3.50 to $4.00/SF, or in the upper ranqe of the
after comparable sales.
Comparable Sales 62, 65, and 67 are also important.
They are all in the L.I.D. 314 area and were sold in a two
month period from December, 1981 to February, 1982. Two were
purchased by BNL Development Corporation. Prices paid were
$1.41/SF, $1.93/SF, and $2.27/SF respectively and are used
herein as comparable sales. Addinq the estimated assessments,
of which they were av 1, the purchase price and the estimated
assessments will increase the total price paid to $2.04/SF,
$2.38/SF, and $2.65/SF. These values for tracts completely
improved are considerably below the present fair market value
for land with comparable improvements, as indicated by the
after comparable sales.
6
CORRELATION - BEFORE VALUE
Because this report is an appraisal of the typical or
average difference in land value due to the impact of L.I .D.
314, and not an appraisal of the value of individual parcels,
the averages of a large amount of sales data are considered
to be accurate and conclusive evidence of value.
The 47 before sales used in this study indicate a range
in value from $0.68/SF to $3.05/SF. The average selling
price of the before comparable sales is $1.78/SF
In objectively refining this estimate of value a number
of sales could be omitted to reflect sales with only the
improved characteristics of the subject properties.
1. Omit Sale 39 fro>r consideration as representino an
exceptionally low price, not appropriate for comp-
arison to land in the subject area.
2. Omit Sales 48 and 54 of Earlinoton Golf Course land
because they have no substantial improved frontages
and will require complete internal development.
3. Omit Sales 4, 6, 7, 8, and 11 as they have no paved
street.
4. Omit Sales 1, 12. 41, 49, and 52 as they have no
sanitary sewer.
Having eliminated these sales from consideration the
remaining 34 sales, all of which have paved streets and
sanitary sewer, range in value from a low of $0.90/SF for
Sale 40 to a hiah of $3.05/SF fcr Sale 23. These sales
indicate an average value of $1 .94/SF for land comparable
to the before L.I.D. 314 situation.
This average is almost exactly the average of the sale
prices of Sales 61, 62, 65, 67, and 69 which are in or
adjacent to L.I.P. 314 and are considered the most comparable
sales. These average $1.93/SF.
The indicated value of typical land in the L.I.D. 314
area in the before situation is $1.94/SF.
7
CORRELATION - AFTER VALUE
The 26 after sales used in this study indicate a
range in value from a low of $2.28/SF for Sale 24 to a
high of $4,66/SF for Sale 73. All are qood comparable
sales and are appropriate for use in this study. These
sales average 53.13/SF, the indicated value of typical
land in the L.I.D. 314 area after the improvements are
completed.
CONCLUSION
Value before L.I.D. 314 improvements $1.94/SF
Value after L.I.D. 114 improvements 53.13/SF
Total benefits to land (difference) PLUS $1.19/SF
The present estimated cost of L.I.D. 314 (not final)
is $6,236,539. There are 12,163,522 square feet of land
to be assessed. Therefore, the estimated cost averages
slightly over 50.51/SF.
Total benefits to land $1.19/SF
Less estimated average cost of L.I.D. 114 0.51/SF
Estimated benefits to land in excess of cost So.68/SF
e
SALES NOT USED
Sales 74 and 75, which are included in the comparable
sales herein, are not ucad because they are sales of intensive
commercial business properties and are not considered to be
representative of the general land values In the LID 314 area.
The following property transfers are not used in this
stud•; as they were involved in trades or were between corpor-
ate affiliates or relatives.
NE 11-22-4 Plaza, Inc./Towne Dev. E6233'78 $2,600,000
NE 13-22-4 ERADCO/Kent Highlands 577027 582,165
NE 13-22-4 Golden Grain/Fisher 596417 1,952,000
SW 25-23-4 Auto Chlor/Heintz Const. 632983 568,000
NW 25-21-4 Rainier/AF. Prop 675439 598,658
5W 36-23-4 Peerage./Corp Prop 674158 1,001,858
NW 36-23-4 Hudcor/Roberts 607331 311,765
NW 36-23-4 Cam Prop/Heinen 591085 27,225
SW 6-22-5 Nowatny;Boise Cascade 653629 239,760
SW 19-23-5 Metre/NW Coml RE 554006 1,701,791
9
ASSUMPTIONS AND LIMITING CONDITIONS
1. All dimensions and laaal descriptions are assumed to
be correct as found througt inspection of available
records.
2, The information used in the data furnished is considered
to be reliable. If any errors in this report are found,
the right is reserved to modify the conclusions reached.
°. Employment to make this report does not require testimony
in court or any public or other hearing as an expert wit-
ness unless mutually satisfactory arrangements are rude
in advance.
4. Neither the employment to make this analysis nor the
compensation is contingent upon the conclusions.
10
uw 0. .Cut e•
PACSTON, TNoulamsMSON, EIUS L HOIMAN
Io oe t. w.o+o
wu"�wtnw. t o e te.IaI• CHOaCC
RM 4P RM.K.Mw.01nR(00 ttt•I\t.wttXd OTO 'dl,tP noe"C!e.<letP
" OWMRw 0C t0900 R{eM.rl wOt. W-M0 1puMi "et pR"ttM�
ri N1W4(.01 Out+ 0 t\(FrOrr!t(001
.0 t1M00
ri ice�"u we ra.{. aatut n+enm R.ace.. ,rot. to-•o,.
l9..•440
u0.•re(ar WM aw
April 91 IaootMw VMi,aew y�.iM O
..c.et.oa a.++".ttta• 1984 rlu.+er,t aw�anatR
r{.t.+.O"[ tOi1 I1N'•ate Rl(COF ItNI IM MM
City Council of Renton
200 Mill Avenue South
Renton, WA 99055
Res Proposed Confirmation of Assessment Role for Local
Improvement District. NO. 314.
Gentlemen;
we are writing you on behalf of Rroadacres, Inc. and the
Washington Jockey Club, owners of LID No. 314 assessment roll
parcel nos. 43, 70, 89, 90 and 91 Ithe "owners") . The legal
descriptions for these parcels I"Parcels"I are attached as
Exhibit A. Upon examination of maps obtained from the City of
Renton and observation of actual improvements made to S.W. 27th
Street as part of LID No. . 14, we believe that the improvements
to such street terminate At the eastern boundary of the parcels.
Pursuant to R.C.W. 35.44.08n and R.C.W. 35.44.110, and based
upon documents furnished to date by the City of Renton, the
owners hereby serve notice of obiection to confirmation of thl.
proposed assessment roll on the grounds that it has been estao-
lished on a fundamentally wrong basis and is unjust and inequi-
table, and also assert that the Citv Council dons not have
jurisdiction to proceed for the reasons set forth below:
1. As shown by the notice of public hearing on the
resolution to creates LID No. 314 scheduled for December 10, 1479,
the total assessment for the Parcels was estimated at S251 ,7
(attached as Exhibit R) r This represented an assessment on the
owners' Parcels of approximately 4.4% of the total estimated cost
of improvements.
The notice of public hearing on the final assessment roll
and excerpts from the roll show that the total final assessment
for the Parcels is $1.036.472.00, or 14.8% of the total cast of
the improvements (please refer to Exhibit Al . We request an
explanation for the sharp increase in cost to the owners'
Parcels, and in the increase of the proportionate share in the
overall cast of the improvements,
City of Renton
April 9, 1984
Page 2
2 *t is a long standing principle of law that property
must be assessed proportionately with the other property included
within the assessment district. LaFranchi v. Seattle, 76 wash.
158, 165, 166 119111 . It is impos T- -determine from the
proposed final assessment roll to what extent the most similarly
situated parcels would bear assessments having a comparable
proportionate increase to total cost of the street improvements.
These parcels include those which are west of the terminus of
improvements to S.W. 19th Street, or the parcels having a
frontage on S.W. 27th Street. Documents which we have received
from the City in response to a request for a copy of the final
assessment roll do not distinguish the amounts which are
attributabl3 to water or sewer improvements, as opposed to street
improvements. However, the Owners believe that the ','seals a•
assessed at a rate disportionate to similarly situated parcels
the L.I.D.
3. Ordinance No. 3396 establishing the local improvement
district ("LID") , state-i that among the improvements would be
*The complete new construction of S.W. 27th Street from a point
200 feet east of the Burlington Northern Railroad riqht-of-way to
the East Valley Road." The actual improvement does not continue
to the poirt established in the ordinance, and is as well short
of the LID boundary shown on the map provided by the City. The
improvement as constructed is substantially different than that
authorized in the ordinance.
4. Crdinance No. 3396 states that the method of assessment
was "to be done on a front footage basis." The actual method of
assessment upon which the final assessment roll is bared is not a
front footage method. There has been no amendment to the original
ordinance, nor any notice or opportunity to be heard extended to
the partic:patinq property owners in the LID to obieat to the
creation of the L.I.D. , because of the proposed change in method
of assessment.
In addition, the preliminary assessment roll (attached as
Exhibit C) shows a front— rootage assessment on parcel No. 19
(Owner's parcel No. 43 in the proposed final assessment roll)
consistent with the extension of S.W. 27t F—Mreet into the parcel
for a distance of approximately 600 est.
S. The City Council obtained urisdiction over the I. T.D.
on the basis of the original notice and hearing. It now at s to
exercise iuriediction on a different method of assessment and
changed nature of improvement. to order to do so, the Co•.acil
must notifv property owners and provide an opportunity to be
heard as tc the changes it has made.
City of Renton
April 9, 1984
Pa, a 3
It the Council refuses to do so, it will deny the statutory
rights of property owners under RCW 35.43.100 and .1s.0 to
challenge jurisdiction of the City to create the L.T.D.
6. As can be seen from the excerpts from the 1981 arterial
streets map for the City of Penton and the 1983 six-year street
program map lateached as Exhibits D and F1 , the City considers
S.N. 27th Street to be a secondary arterial. It will serve as a
connection between West Valley Road and Fast Valley Road, and
will be of general public benefit.
It is likely that when construction of S.W. 21th Street is
completed through to West Valley Rosd the owners will undoubtedly
be assessed for the improvements. However, other property owners
along the present S.W. 27th Street improvements will probably not
be included in any future L. I.D. for the extension of S.N. 27th
Street because any such extension would not pass through their
property.
The . 'feet of the present and contemplated future improve-
ments to S.W. 27th Street would mean that the Owners would have
to fund such construction to an extent far in excess of the
assessments levied against other property owners similarly
situated along the street. This is fundamentally wrong in view of
the fact that, as stated previously, S.W. 27th Street is contem-
plated by the City to serve as a secondary arterial providing
benefit to the entire community, not inst to the Owners.
In fact, any future extension will create serious problems
for the Owners who would have to construct bridge overpasses
signals, or other improv,imen�s in order to allow safe access
between the Parcels which would than be divided by the street.
Would these improvements be paid for by the Owners alone?
7. To the best of our knowledge, the final assessment roll
is based upon an appraisal made by J. Ralph Gilbo as of January
11, 1983. The appraisal determined that the highest and best use
for property an the west side of East Vallev Road was as light
industrial uses. Mr. Bilbn established that the highest and best
use of the land on the Fast side of East Vallev Pend was as
improved. Because of this, he determined hat property on the
East side of East Vallev Road and a small strip along S.W. 16th
Avenue would receive less benefit than other properties in the
L.S.D. , ii.cluding the Owners' Parcels.
As a result, the her.efit to the land on the East side of
East. Vallev Road was calculated at S .40 per souare foot, while
land on the West side was calculated at $1.19 per square font.
Based on the information which we have received to data from the
City, the pr .posed final assessment rol . reflects the appraiser's
opinion that there is a differential in benefit from the tamp,
City of Renton
April 9, 39R4
PAge 4
improvement:+, depending upon the present development of the
parcel.
The Owners acknowledge that their parcels are not presently
developed in the manner of the properties on the E;:st Side of
Er st Valley Road. Howevr., there is no historical basis or
present basis for assuming that the Parcels will be developed as
light industrial use, or other uses contemplated by the appraiser
far property on the West Side of East Valley Road.
The Parcels were acquired to provide additional property for
the support of the owners' Adiacent horse racing facility. As
long as Longacrms continues in operation, the highest and best
use of the parcels will be this purpose. At present, some of the
propert • is used as a parking area.
Thus, it is erroneous to treat the Owner's Parcels similarly
to other undeveloped parcels on the West Side of East valley Road
for Assessment purposes. When arch other parcels are developed
to their highest and best use, tney will receive benefit from the
improvements of L.I.D. No. 314 far greater than the owners'
Parcels. If a differential in benefit in the final Assessment
roll is to be made based upon the city appraisers' "highest and
hest use," the Owners' Parcels are more similar to the improved
parcels along East valley Road, And should be treated
accordingly.
R. The short amount of time between the receipt of the
notice of the public hearing and the date for such hearing has
not allowed the owners the time neoeseary to conduct a thorough
investigation of the .facts, nor to prepare an adequate case to
present to the City Council to support its objections. In
addition, the Owners were denied access to the appraisal until
less than a week before the hearing, which is certainly not
enough time to have it adequately evaluated by experienced
appraisers. Further, despite repeated requests, the City has not
provided tht owners with a map of the L.I.D. reflecting parcel
numbers carrespondinq to the proposed final assessment roll, or
any changes in parcel size or location since the time the map
provided to the Ownere was prepared.
Mr. Larry Warren, City Attorney for the City of Renton, has
informed us that he would advise the Council to continue the
hearing scheduled far April 9, 1984, to a future date which would
permit. Adequate time for all property ownera to present their
respective cases in full, including all written materials which
may be deemed neceasary as support for their objections. We
believe that the Council should follow Mr. Warren's Advice and
continue the hearing. However, we urge that the COUAcil grant at
least a four week continuance and such additional continuances as
are reasonable to permit the acouisition of all relevant
. City of Renton
April 9, 1a84
Page 5
documents, and time to adequately prepare a presentation which
will be useful to the Council in its deliberations as a board of
equalization.
While the owners desire to cooperate with the Citv in
resolving their obiectinns to the LID and the assessment$, they
must also preserve their rights to appeal in case an amicable
solution cannot be agreed upon. As the Council's consideration
of the assessment roll is a quasi-judicial proceodinq, anv appeal
will consider only the evidence presented to the Counc:.l. In
order for the Owners to preserve their due process rights, it is
necessary that thev be granted adequate time in which to prepare
and present the evidence necessary.
Very truly vours,
PRFSTON, THORGRIMSON,
F.LLIS 4 HOLMAN
1, 0 �-
By Brian J. Ratner
Attornevs for Broadacres, Inc.
and '+ashington Jockev Club
BJR/ald
ends.
uar*"'cgs or
PRE$TON. THORpRIMSON, ELLIS 4i HOLMAN
w oo .a.. aY•L oY"
ftat Yt,,,O� ju •e so[ears f-0_�
a iYrry[Op it.ft[a�NliMiNO tLN�[Ir 11 _
. inlW Mw OC [ ,Os ... r1.61 t4 CIY.i.
[Apvy(9Gl ya.r)p0 r[,[W,aYi 1I"a Yi 7N ire Na WO
.n[[aao\"„s.r aro«ra...wwi•ow»[b
[l[C6N ,•0a11fyr0M 1.[\ 1,Wi �Y0M[4 ,[.ICC.' JJa 114'101. .[y n,pYi liGai atiYpO
«e L[."u•\Y.[.o\ ..\awn.tu.s a»o.ru
wr r,Y".ec r.i..i»a 4: April . 1984 vw V[NV[ i[ w`[Lcwwr uon na•a« P .w:.:.ra�wi«.•
vawrors RW-.a..a.
YVNe pON.«.
Lawrence J. Warren
Counsel, City of Renton
100 South Second Street
P.O, Lox 626
Renton, NA 98057
Re; LTD No. 314
Dear Mr. Warren:
The purpose of this letter is to emphasize the willingness
of Broadacres, Tnc, and the Washingtun Jockey Club (the "Owners")
to cooperate with the City of Renton in determining the final
assessment roll ("roll*) for Local Tmprovement District No, 314.
The owners supported LTD No, 3140 and are willing to pay their
fair share of the roll,
However at the present time, the owners are unable to
deteim.ne whether or not the amounts which have been assessed to
their parcels are in proportion to the benefit received. More
time is needed in order for the Owners to study information which
it has received, and to obtain additional information.
The Owners arge that the City Council grant additional time
to all property owners in order to adequately examine the facts
surrounding the final assessment. Again, the Owners hope that
this matter can be resolved amicably and in enoperation with the
City,
Very truly yours,
P :STON, THORCRTMSON,
ELLIS i HOT-MAN
A
By
Arian J. Ratner
A"RIAld
c.c% Renton City Council
1
:.
CITY OF AON.
NOTICE OF RM*,C tIEMING
HENiON CITY C&INCIL
RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING
COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 8.00 P,M.
APRIL 9, 1994
NOTIfF OF RR IC NEARING, ON FINAL AUSSMIT ROLL FOR LiD 314
NOTICE 19 HEREBY GIVEN that the final Assessment Roll foi Local Improvement
District No. 314. East Valley Road, is on file in the office of the City
Clerk. In accordatce with City of Renton Resolution N1. 2283. amended by
Resolution No. 2299, creating and establishing Local Improvement District
No. 314, and with Ci -y of Renton Ordinance No. 3396, ordering construction
of the project, roadway Improvements have been constructed, and include
installation of sanitary sewers, water main, fire b- rants, curbs, gutters,
sidewalks, street lighting and all necessary appurtenances in the vicinity
of Eest Valley Highway and S.W. 16th St. from SR W ramp northerly and
westerly t� Lind Avenue t.W,
SAID ROLL HAS bEEN set for hearing at a regular merting of the Renton
City Council on April 9, 1184, at 8:00 p.m. All persons who object to
said assessments, or any pa-t of them, may file written objections with
the City Cler, at or prior to the time and date of the hearing. At the
Lima fixed for hearing lt;ec: ions to the confirmation of the assessment
roll, and at the times to which the hearing may be adjourned, tht ,ouncil
sits as d Board of Egualiaatitn and may correct, revise, raise, lower,
change, or modify the roll or sny part thereof, or set aside the roll
and order the assessment to be de novo, and at the conclusion thereof,
confirm the roll by ordinance.
TOTAL FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL LID 314: $6,969,113.60
sn a-,(1 r. u•. \ n ens ;+ ,"n�ns
lY! 4 urU M rIl . S1t 1 .' ( I 9iw rt'
9!6 1t
9i
r.e wla •. +nt l otsrlx tags sl9.e
b>ta W,W1% It n 4 1 q9 t L.ia,1\ t q yr sl
IN LISS S MS.0 It 11 4n All I Ln
. _. kiss l 10 4+ _ -
Sit 2a a3•n1 M 111 of N \A 10% `• •.+
aQ.. ..twYtwa int_ -
f F-2-11"*Q bn Hall!M 1.n tn9{Y
Maxine E. Motor
City Clerk
Dates of Publication:
March 16, IR, 19, 20, 21, 1984
r
CITY OF RFinON
NDTICE (jF Pl&jc,1EARING
Ra(IDN CITY C"CIL
RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING
COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 8:00 P,M.
APRIL 9. 1984
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING, CPI F:NFL A SESSE Uff ROL FOR LID 314
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Final Asses;ment Roll for Local Improvement
District No. 314, East Valley Road, is on file in the office of the City
Clerk, in accordance with City of Renton Resolution No. 2283. amended by
Resolution No. 1199, creating and establishing Local Improvement District
No. 314, and with City of Renton Ordinance No. 3396, ordering construction
Of the project, roadway improvements have been constructed, and include
installation of sanitary sewers, water main, fire hydrants, curbs, gutters,
sidewalks, street lighting and all necessary appurtenances in the vicinity
Of East Valley Highw-y and S.W. 16th St. from SR 167 ramp northerly and
westerly to Lind Avenue S.W.
SAID ROLL HAS BEEN set for hearing at a regular meeting of the Renton
City Council on April 9. 1984, at 8:00 p.m. All persons who object to
said assessments, or any part of them, may file written objections with
the City Clerk at or prior to the time and date of the hearing. At the
time fixed for hearing objections to the confirmation of the asses,ment
roll, and at the times to which the hearing may be adjourned, the Council
sits as a Board of Equalization and may correct, revise, raise, lower,
change, or modify the roll or any part thereof, or set aside the roll
and order the assessment to be de novo, and at the conclusion thereof,
confirm the roll by ordinance.
TOTAL FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL LID 314: $6,969,113.60
NI cn or ;y ,N s uo 1t TN Y _.eL,a ]s
Mmon NA MISS AOs.t It tN 1 Vu A, 410 It -
of p: in N In f In N o 1, a;N Tx N - -
_..__ Ate 30 41. F ;n pf X TN 1 to etC _
_ a t s.a Ae a, r;r ei 0.i.i. .ioA�n"—--
AiY -
Llss N "a it L 01'u 11 NIN -
-- to of Lt A 1 IN of AT to s¢ 2sgl•04 -
tN Y to I le 01 M a'.Tk N Aiq q!Y
s to of/YN Iuo It,le TN 1 L
_. ._._..,_. . ._f _. r
M1' Aiq SY IN lP rt N Ot
- Nq fN s
to lea TW 41 14 A for GI a of W
P443dB a t of xe Im L s of s
_ I"St ALSO aY 1N of Y IA lr S
of L 1S11e SI foe 1 Lo,k Ale IQS
7A "0' L tNo Mon r,A 14Nor et N(
'Ir SK 34 L iS-tl•C� _
CITY OF RENTON
Maxine E. Motor
City Clerk
Dates of Publication:
Match 16, 19, 19, 20. 21, 1984
1
CITY OF RENTON
OFFICE OF CITY CLERK
NAME OF OWNER ASSESSMENT ROLL NUMBER
Broadacres, Inc.
653 Skinner Bldg. 29
Seattle, WA 98101
DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY
SEC 25-23-04, GL 10 LESS POR LY NLY OF LN RNG FR PT ON E LN 255.38 FT S OF
HENRY MEADER DC #46 TAP ON FLY MGN DF N P R/W IN GL 11 289.12 FT SLY OF SD
OC AS MEAS ALG ELY FraN SO R/W TGW N 10 ACS OF SW 1/4 OF NE 1/4 TGW N 330 FT
OF SE 1/4 OF NW 1/4 LY ELY OF N P RR R/W TGW POR GL 11 LN ELY OF N P RR R/W
LESS NLY POR BAAP ON ELY MGN SD N P RR R/W 289.12 FT SLY MEAS ALG SE MGN
FR S LY HENRY MEADER D C R 46 TH ELY TAP ON E LN GL 10 DIST 255.33 FT SLY
OF SC D C.
You were previously notified that the City Council of the City of Renton
has declared its intention to create Local Improvement District Number
`319. You %ere also notified of the estimated assessment to be borne by
your property as its share of the cost of improvement.
A public hearing on the proposed improvement was held by the City Council
on November 5, 1979. At that hearing the Council instructed the Public
Works Department to examine the proposed improvement to determine
whether certain features could be modified or deleted to reduce the
overall estimated cost. The Council then continued the hearing until
8:00 p.m., December 10, 1979.
The revised total estimated cost am ^xpense of the proposed improvement
is $5,660,000.00. The revised estimated assessment against the above
described property is:
Street improvements: 217 1 3F_p7
Water improvements:
SWwer improvements:
Total assessment: 2 1-7� O i
A public information meeting will be held at 1C:00 a.m. on December E,
1979 in the Renton City Council Chamber, second floor, Renton Municipal
Buildinq, Representatives of the Public Works Department will discuss
the revised improvements and answer questions from the audience.
The continuation cf the City Council Hearing on the proposed improvement
will be held at 6:00 p.m. on December 10, 1979 in the Council Chambers.
Written protests shall be filed with the City Clerk at or prior to the
time fixed for the continuation of said hearing. Protests shou'd contain
lot, block, addition or any other identifying descriptions. Protests
previously filed are no longer valid, therefore, persons previously
filing protests must re-file their protests if they wish to continue to
protest.
CiTY OF RENTON
Delores A. Mead, C.M.C.
City Clerk
CITY OF RENTON
OFFICL OF CITY CLERK
NAME OF OWNER ASSESSMENT ROLL NUMBER
Brcadacres Inc.
653 Skinner Bldg. 78
Seattle, WA 98101
DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY
SEC 25-23-04, S 990 FT OF SE 1/4 OF NW 1/4 LY E OF N P R/W LESS S 545.6 FT
AS HEIRS AEG E LN iGW SW 1/4 OF "E 1/4 LESS S 545.6 FT AS MEAS ALG W LN
LESS N 10 ACS.
You were previously notified that the City Council of the City cf Renton
has declared its Intention to create Local Improvement O+stric: Number
1314. You were also notified of the estimated assessment M be borne by
your property as its share of the cost of improvement.
A public hearing on the proposed improvement was held by the City Council
or November 5, 1979. At that nearing the Council instructed the Public
Works Department to examine the proposed improvement to determine
whether certain features could be modified or deleted to reduce the
overall estimated cost. The Council then continued the hearing until
8:00 p.m„ Decerter 10, 1r79.
The revised total estimated cost and expense of the proposed improvement
is $5,660,00D.00. The revised estimated assessment against the above
described property is:
Street improvements.
Water improvements:
Sewer improvements: B Q QQ
lotal assessment: �09723
A public information meeting will be held at 10:00 a.m. en December 6,
1979 in the Renton City Council Chamber, secon. floor, Renton Municipal
Buildirg. Representatives of the Public Works Department will discuss
the revised irprovemnnts and answer questions from the audience.
The continuation of the City Council Hearing on the proposed irprovement
will he held at 8:00 p.m, on December 10, 1979 in the Council Chambers.
Written protests shall be filed with the City Clerk at or prior to the
time fixed for the continuation of said hearing. Protests should contain
lot, block, addition or any other identifying descriptions. Protests
previously filed are no longer valid, therefore, persons previously
filing protests must re-file their protests if they %-ish to continue to
protest.
CiTY OF RE:JON
Delores A. Neap', C.M.C.
City Clerk
CITY OF RENTON
OFFICE Of CITY CLERK
NAME OF OWNER ASSESSMENT ROLL NUMBER
Naahington Jockey Club
653 Skinner Bldg. 79
Seattle, WA 98101
DESCRIPT10If OF PROPERTY
SEC 25-23-04 POR OF GLS 10 d 11 BEG NXN E LN GL 10 Y SLY LN HENRY MEADER
DC 46 TH SLY ALG SO E LN 255.38 FT TH WLY TAP ON E LN N P RIW IN GL 11 AT
PT 289.12 FT SLY AS MEAS ALG SO A/W FR S LN SD DC TH N TO SD S LN TH E TO
BEG.
You were previously notified that the City Council of the City of Renton
has declared its intention to create Local Improvement District Number
314, You were also notified of the estimated assessment to be borne by
your property as its share of the cost of improvement,
A public hearing on the proposed improvement was held by the City Council
on November 5, 1979. At that hearing the Council instructed the Public
Works Department to examine the proposed improvement to determine
whether certain features could be modified or deleted to reduce the
overall estimated cost. The Council then continued the hearing until
8:00 p.m., December 10, 1979.
The revised total estimated cost and expense of the proposed improvement
is $5,660,000.00. The revised estimated assessment against the above
described property is:
Strut fmprovcments: __L' M�if_L
Water improvements: QQl2
Sewer improvements:
Total assessment: _4L42(e�..L.L._.._
A public infcrmatioo meeting will be held at 10:00 a.m. on December 6,
1979 in the Renton City Council Chamber, second floor, Renton Kunicipal
Building. Representatives of the Public Works Departrent will discuss
the revised improvements and answer questions from the audience.
The continuation of the City Council Hearing on the proposed improvement
will be helc at 8000 p.m, on December 10. 1979 in the Council Chambers.
Written protests shall be filed with the City Clerk at or prior to the
time fixed for the continuation of said hearing. Protests should contain
lot, block, addition or any other identifying descriptions, Protests
previously filed are no longer valid, therefore, persons previously
filing protests must re-file their protests if l :y wish to continue to
protest.
CITY OF RENTON
Delores A. Mead, C.M.C.
City Clerk
CITY OF RENTON
OFFICE OF CITY CLERK
NAME OF 4KER ASSESSMENT ROLL NLIMBER
Washingtun Jockey Club
635 Skinner Building B0
Seattle, Washington 98101
DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY
Tax Lot NO. 16, Henry Meader Donation Claim No. 46.
You were previously notified that the City Council of the City of Renton
has declared its intention to create Local improvement District Number
314. You were also notified of the estimated assessment to be borne by
your property as its share of the cost of improvement.
A public hearing on the proposed improvement was held by the City Council
on November 5, Mg. At that hearing the Council instructed the Public
Works Department to examine the proposed improvement to determine
whether certain features could be modified or deleted to reduce the
overall estimated cost. The Council then continued the hearing until
8:00 p.m., December 10, 1979.
The revised total estimated cost and expense of the proposed improvement
is $5,660,000.00. The revised estimated assessment against the above
described property is:
Street improvements:
Water improvements:
Sewer improvements:
Total Assessment:
A puttic information meeting will be held at 10:00 a.m. on Decemter 6,
1979 in the Renton City Council Chaeter, second floor, Renton Municipal
Building. Representatives of the Public Works Department will discuss
the revised improvements are answer questions from the audienre.
The continuation of the City Council Hearing on the proposed improvement
will be held at 8:00 p.m. on December 10, 1979 in the Council Chambers.
Written protests shall be filed with the City Clerk at or prior to the
time fixed for the continuation of said hearing. Protests should contain
lot, block, addition or any other identifying descriptions. Protests
previously filed are no longer valid, therefore, persons previously
filing protests must re-file their protests if they wish to continue to
protest.
CiTY OF RENTON
Delores A. Mead, C.M.C.
City Clerk
4
..nil.. ••.. . .',•ENT ROLL
.IgY.9w r liM
nll . IasVA eb
N.Y V O.w� OUCr/eCw 0« IY �• ••r.•'"�"w...r.�_.._.
ie.4 .ol.tfe. P.,i _-.LOT/. 11OC1 !, eup .11,111 No i7eln -
_ Ul :otHt ► Pl. at"To,11. P+L•u OD -".�' IOCKYl1
s..ttl.. Y. ;tun coo zR
.... ptui OCO aA1J. _
ie.s_. Oliot, P. re - TOTAL - IfYi(j$3 L01 r, PtNI I, IbU 1 .ulu;l. IW SRIET 1,14X$ m n'All(evl Hl h ..\ Px gvrOv 11.
saltie, W ti -Y0.ni OCO Zrf
s[WS om ZAU
14 .._-_._ .SOUL eau(
414011 PAY
LDI . AIDS' :, .;Se v YII !. la stgtr '��.R7 :.r1141Z 1.�
417[.vap •y et vinrpe/I.
yMR. Ow � - tog
Ste- 000 ZAU GTA
Gl) YAU
. IDEAL.
1/ Uy [TrH sac :S-iYO/. PJl.i of Ot 91 S[ IH $I4171 GYKZ.A(,X
-oft, of Rent" .to M 114 PIT IW 10 FT Y I I:S4.M SH(tP IZfr1 m 'I. IQ.y,YrAJ
Ely v.li R s W vt ON SO R Tv a 11-:4-4 Y WATER 5S44tco.Q, Z/sll w 4m..W Nait lot'A'TT M TO M n( Of Y IN Srtf/ 71 j4',%.S
SD..( N oI-PI-Ht �0T4 «� ZAIJ f p
L NLt1I7 ii.f.
I a-te.0 t lalst IT WE to a It Y -. i�IL"4g9i
II OF I U to$l 1/4 IN.004E-10 t
1141L11 n to no.
2% .PltWun., l.e. SEE :s-ll.a. 4 10 LESS "Gt WAY STxffT .� .. -
/St ski", I.11Yi*1 ';!JM''b '.11' � 7t�EtYti
W LS SK II n ai t LS:ss,)ens stecfl 119126
swnl.. W tiwt -K%1y KAM DI a I/ 7u OR fly will Wlti coo
or 1 P 1/v 14 OL 11 lM.is n sit of stwo OCC 7AU oOrO
._.__.._..._ _. . sO at as ill., VIA M ItY rn waL. .. lyu9
_.. . 1 to PCs 11 sY i/4.at et 114 YOU X
_1)0 n 01 S[ 114 oT„M 1!/V fU o7_If P l.P l./t TOt FOR.OL tt If ELt Of i t
P SP P/t its$%I roi tW Oe tky i 1
_ _...._�._... _ Itji SD M P le;'Y:M,It n 4v vCR
- +44 u I411 fi 1(1 44MI vlNLS 0.C 1
- - 16 IS ELT 1R DI I LS ft to Dist:s%- f
11 n SAY of so 0 C,
so . .. _
M.t So.M Pv.e[I L+/St .SEC 14-71•01.Y 1/2 of SY Ifl.of it true ilQG1Co 7 Pveet Taker h110i+1 _ 1//LESS Si.rt vIWP Sg1 i2.'351
I .Mlle.... W goo, W7f4 O 91 1) ZA i 11�75t1
total. Oro J+U
- ZAU aco
CQ7
total. tAf 11H.
11 .. .elmic IyyliH 0. sit m-11-as,t loo IT O1 M IPt N S7Wj ,L iw-a) `, '.P.O. OWNER or K IN N LT V Of PSei I t OF EAST SHfn 1'74
w+w, W M011 !/LEAS wI s.v Ta nil. *m u` I
_., tMi CIo lZ
1983
ARTERIAL
STREETS
� A
I• �. su�E 1•.e00'
EXHIBIT 'C�
t j tt HEARING ✓UNf ?O. r9B3 _
4 t ADO"TE0 JUNf ?7, 9d3__
` RESOLUTIONLL
M E R C E R
r
I S L A N D '.
AA
SOUTHERN PORTION �. r./ 7at' T.
w� .,ir—
1
n S. .1
I
. .,. 11 I �' I` • '� ' OMF;�
. I _
l.T-.y�sT'. .Lta�w�al.{MhN.w•e..�rM..aHYe�r�r�r�Y r..r w�u lu�riu�•ii•'� �
Manor
.1. ' , + './; illy + ,� I It . . : .■ :� � ilk \ �
lb
Ilk
14
Y` 4
1 �,i� na:a+ Ma7.�a. �naa\Mw�.apsa•aw•��•� �w�a. �\
��.i= ��EI T��a?.�lil�,fi �lr,, � � 1' Li i•y= \ I \� *.� ', �.
-y]r.,�r S1 � '� •,IPI � 4 ' . i♦ ��'`•• l.._a`�•,•r .war•. ..�� I 1 I.�, 1.���
tv 71 ■ r■Iwln p r •.
�a^^■11 � � � .. .fir..� ��:Y.{v ail�l.�`�1��:��' ��TjTa y��'�� ��I�I �jl��la{i , ,� I����r
ti
i
rwr, n rin lc wu�
w j
ImAu
yylyy/, YVIt��r /, INI vdM M.Itlpl Wl1Ilel I
I,f[. 4.8, H� Ileer fwterrq Yw
.�� . , •4iiPi T
TO 0""
allow 1/. NItOVLL 01 Krr-rr l 0/ WYMKB 1. 1/,1
.. e. t1IRLLI Its munw m
w
•. YSerrrl rS 0tt4lb 1g�v, Jeee ttw, Yrt H1147 YM.
\� S.W. 71Ut IL, i.e. Rot It. a4 I-W, ]]11 /Irnt, M1al-Ylr�w+� .
wn .
T. ol.o /OSItI►I
•. IT= mm tTvm
7. tin MO ammancoom ,
ktioucaw
InAm 0y H1114.1C YCYa ;
Named". aa.00e.r I. it's talon halt/pl Mll4a0
9,00 no Ith III cost orws• a.w
e
fnaat, YMrN c, tA.uoe. fMl•rtu
peal lulbo.t, Trafltr In01heorlas
Na. rl•�t. plaalea '•r N t r wet
altbare Ibyhtos, 1,18 ,.rl.y IWety bar
W hl000, tvlle4y bl rtrla.
haMn Dmfeyb. Can Leemneeat
Jobe a Ioy, taeba / ba.lmet,oe �Iroler
,�_ bade Itoea. Aesllwt __ _
ale vT [1
1M ueosMI 1. We wiry of tM beat' el rNl It Y.ru Coo ed/N
W 9.00 D.C.
7. M 1q a►IDaWIL 0p ICDOID. M7voj k lamw, ooaa,dol le '„atOa, 'he ataatw
beiFwwO a tart.+, �L'i/,.lip6Lli•
1. r boom
..
a ap► dear ... day a•. s w► et to i;.%f
.� part aY r to Kan, tM el" Chap er't a7 etha^ dawtaW,.tt P• .ba
LaIesels a eras• saubrer be o+e YllLty to eypest a L.I.D. mlbrror toeeLepOme tat.. a eta
w do*WhUoD►w.penYe. M Cold It .Cod be m "MOW* haedd tp " WCell tho L.�ub.
bald at tau ties. to ew "MMIOM that.Bubo rector awlbaDle for the pnlon rl Lu7 Coo.
O.Y. Md that Kr. itme rCo l"tsUlm a MCI, esV, fat rNa► er"It Yoatd be Dtta W w
tM tee" Ltpterwat dlstrut. Yr. a ptee 1"* 04 the city W rooatred a ptlldw Ian
an Lao e, gat Call" bead tean Derlfaltro�artlun ad reaeesrON tart der. stoes be ropltet
soap I"ptttfw. Won few w rLurJsd D per"me "tail test euoo tw ,Abel" deer,
■tall be oft the Dest Waller Wd. ►Loss"S,yell lisp u wa the We WOLL" Dad Lyvnwl
at title flan m1 a Mad or Commands flied for the nhar straot. Ne. 0eeaoem0 rated am LD
,.•-:•1. ewer tote. plebes. nd.,,,W. ant, deal" M war ru M probably mwio we be
tawtradted tot as Lost tw psn. lode ids"or
Wly IT ON a a000pta►la a,t Cold as u
doter the Leprory.mts a the Wt tall" bad W L at • wftor w tha Cohar neWa.
Y-:ad►Y LtltiW tbay W hied drlo+ W oJ¢edM fyrowtwb et w Cot r.tlp bd lLl.0
par yiad o7 sae►OO eYtdan to Pdeting Of the ra01d tm-4 and tadw 0b tve,sabsrM a
8.0, fled St. Cod I.Y. fird St, WuNOOr to W pesnp• Of itme"4001" wrraanes. Dlaet.e,o
smewbW try ✓�to tide). Dlm^,stw tolleaa/. It bel.,a anted that It w inlmranla Its IaOaew'
told w Wt Yell" Deed be all pat ds at sub Iles by We L.I.D. " Comwtlao mald b .alder.
leMtll,te estlon by CUMIS, oeteeMae by COLEY. tltyl Ills Lest Val I" IIe00 be 10e911M else
t/.e wwlooa t of tha 0r•'ietf Md fed wirer be grated 0e Ise cfher Ifr"" rralaev N •111,7
Of restrictive t, tv. Yes. nose reftontad Me mlLlfapare to air the L.1.0. twltlw
ant pet ties Mad, a. Dorrlhteo acted the palmtop ebwld be des all at ass Club, rt desirable
ds de tN pnlwt pteeMo ai, pneera►le tM .bold ►mart be dess be m L.I.D.
:^_TION fillQ. OY the oplp "I wile, it Coo oeowdod►e ttltl7. tha
1. Ds&-ijamm, toss
6. TM• Deco
7. Wa
a �, TW catty Nlaenad It t fa a.a.
OOAAO 0r PAL It wooks
Sae 1). 11If page tem.
uwld Mee to "ply to tee board fnr p,r llsion to ea Needed with the da.nl ltla.
we sate to had failed to Mr. Nare; nil Turfed, and M said No uoeld It.. Ibw all
the help he could :m getting tee eet"I'l out of there, tees hap lis:Asty I.-
vurato to cover tee eeeal Rion of the b."dlnp. Mrs, Macy Iloneow" dm eased
pee wa fir, earel'S sister, pall shot she, hed ca11N the bids a two alkali
I'o "I,. .mob sae up Ind IMrd woen'1 a,one available at this tip too,
the job; also, there was a lot of board feet cf IrNr in the b.11dlng In Prod
cad,t la W It seeowd too bed to rv:o It. Mr. eelsa observed that the tow.
Nan lmnlvN had de.ul IIMd a bull ling Or, N.I. Itte, and kirklad there wes " A
problem with It. Mr, f Svcs awplamN iNl they eats, to Sol"" Ite, Ir
be, In the bullding as, Ny "dared as Starting Ml th the too $I"' So the IMr
floor woulI ha secure . sA1a they reached the MIl" I$., the, Movie provide 7
7111•hour security of . property. M rots, also that the miler" More out Of r
school rear, " leers .ould be lost denger to tw.m. Fire Ch.rf ROfaalar rated
Coed It las: 0 Twent,-four security or cyclae forted 1"k"i 1) tl Mt,-da,
MdenlMw, fees data of Strait: 1) NO ►urnlae. Marls to be td "d. MI plled; }A) pier, for de l'ti" and a .d paMotrla pnaeetla ifacs)I S) Nalntaaca ,
.1 pope ~$ of wtratd oM allot for fire pMtfti" deed life safety; 61 firs•,
aid New fire pioteclla, Mhos owlntelnedi 7) Atts,b to hysrat #knit " ran•
tolrlWi b) he" I Ins, should f. n:d for dest patfol; 5) Access to one of
but l ding ohe11 be owl Mtalnad. tbve4 be MACAR01;11t114, temadS be peal Cf C.ONS,
the Noa.ld dtlpl the dfAlr"44 wish the Ountdamp 04."44n oautwy and pulap
n 44WAt 11+441! tjlletM ddW Need this yVt4A^tA Slut to the EWU"y 0a.,uram
shod t..0 ptpatt WAt'A eteMOKA/Atiau old to MMIes1 he J% Mftd it .:Iettu-daV
tatewt"M a. the damoUtaan, MMON CA=tp.
►. �loyMb�4a Cap for Imantla to eandiro Mdul rawall Mr sfcne
ampial filter 1 N woe n g wan to r�M s it of the prep-
arty, the pose 11, roplT" a 1167.000 aeM, he asked to the grated a uco•
t IM to tee Mb r 117,000 oho 001011ed that the ware wider the 150,OOd bad
had boom immolated and approved by the City fled that he had Cent"116ted ping
aheed Mlle fIRISh/ng the other work, but then re•111" eknt bouldered of 1M Street
IrprovMAlrto a toot Valley Ned• test then wild he sew champ" be M In
the ttle" dnion. Mr. Salnaann "104 they were geing to "k the C ocll to
,Mq Pw d with the LID and the pu►1 It Works haeertaket would Mve ea object IN,
to 011Mlowting the hand r.4,1, at at this flow. Mr. Stone Mviny slaves the
LID petition. NMd by MVF CLINtNS. aernMtd be RICMARC RISSItt, the Paso
r0eu• u the tLbtac 100tka Dtpaadtnt terOwmeaddt.pe and ptast We. Stoat see
t.ccimlIe, l0 the rand %C4w point. w7tok CARRIFt'.
COMfIMT1 .`NO AMID ctyAnys: More
ANIOIIOSMINT: The Meetlna adjocraed at 9:45 a... I
i
r )
4 BOARD OF PU/Lit WORKS
APPLICATION FOR APPEAL
CITY OF RENTON
�r
0
• + „ DATE Of OILING �o"a� LS GRANTED
D141ED
DAT( Or HEARING 1I.1-'/P APPEALED
■ Y Y • • • Y • M Y • • t Y . t • • • • M . t • • r M Y Y M M Y
NAME Or APPL,CANT T00 J STeJ E
I' PIN
1. ADORES$ sr.?;.II $ Y _M!!Y>7L.1S4
1 ), ADDRESS OF ►ROPltTY INVOLVED S
\. t"GAL DESCRIPTION
? Or PROPERTY INVOLVED: LOT $LOCK PLAT yu CA{yp
r
t u
S. FARSENT :WING M-P
S. EXACT VARIANCE RlQUCSTED Styr�e�-M•IaM.1�t�G.
aee�
- . l "y -Lw.PAP$IclN Ll17% G.y
EA'sr �r•nI RD .s.w 7/!'. 9/tom sw :•tom^ i
i
7. WHY CA'I'T TIME PSOPIRTY SI CtVILO►ED WITHIN THI RSQUI11M[NTf
OF TIME VDINANCil
_'.ys- ':?S T rAr✓O L f6t2? PY g L L Z:F et c' _
Lr,fdulA.rr,/t — .F PU I PAWT7t IA012t
- _7}4er L TO LV&A2, A rAriyrr_
M. WHAT SPECIAL CIRCUMSTANCES OR CONDITIONS APPLY TO SUBJCCT
PROPERTY WHICH AR! PECULIAR 70 SUCH PROPERTY AND 01) NOT I
APPLY GENERALLY TO PROPERTY IN THE Nl IGHSOMIICOD
1Z AM -rye fr e%r pt�w .EIt-var s7N!
..17XC r}Il6it — .f/_�E i w/ LV 6 rL L
ti.Lr�e.seT 14n�H GP/P' 6/rC- CIU__
Nj 1• IS THE VARIANCE REQW/TlD THE MINIMUM VARIAMC NICISSART 10
V' ALLOW THE RLASOMyLE USt OF THE PRO►ERTTP �E3 3
10. WILL ,ME SPRMTINS Or THE Itt"STID VARIAvt! BI IN MARNONT
WITH THE DlVELOMNT Or SUAAOWOING PROPl RTT AND NDT IWU-
i RIOUS TO THE 114.19H001H000 OR DETRIMENTAL TO THE PUBLIC
[I 1 OICLARI TNAT 1 AM THE OW AR Or PROPIPTY INVOLVED IN THIS
i APPLICATION AND THAT THE 11011001NG STAT/IIIMTS AN' ANSKIRS
V, MERSIN CONTAIMID AND THE IMPORMATtW N11/WITH S.ANITTIO AN
IN ALL RISPICTS TRUI AND CORRECT TO THt MIST ' MY KNOWLION '
AND B1111P.
—IozY 1 T1MI 11 APPLICANT
r
i
:f
:.� Data: Octaa.t 21, 197E
,t
BOARD OF PUBLIC NOOKS REFERRAL MEETING OF Eoe�ia 1, l E
t, -
m H.a Etecksoa. Fleoaeas Dltator
F.ul La"a". Tntfec E.El..etitq
Elci.td 9eeF.toe, CeEtaeerloS FUFety r
TO. 9m ielem. Eulldioi Diteete.
8091sCr: Jo1.t Stme. Feat 9417 i
S.W. II.q Rot. S.W. 7Ita- Sot Y.rebra
CDNNSF9s: lbp to attaatve to the erlE3..1
t
12
{
1
{, .r . •.. 1 ,.S�^�� !AI"'..hNk+it'.alr.W.'iV.�wlt+•
. + t
I
, I
h I
)I r?hf
i t R k1. i
#� PUBLIC WORKS DEPARIMgNT
■g IMRNEN C G(Hff/ASON. P E. • fMl1ECy0O
YUINbrIt YWIDMO M Ill AVt f0 AlNrON an m ).t/Nt
J
d`
MRD tgEi^t+
CwAus J DEIAURSN)1
"Von
4.
Y.yae•er J, Iola
e a
e �
Mr. John Stone
3111 S. Nenito bled. i
Spotdns. VA 9920)
"I Deferral 01 off-Site lgrove•ente. ILLn1-vAnm.rr.
cant valley Ytg►oey. S.Y. Lst St., S.Y. 91st St.
end 5.Y. MIS It.
Dear Mr. Stoe.r
funueet to Your talglme request of thin data, the Santa f
Public War" voted to defer Your request until the neat
SOS. Yoveuner a. Iola. 9:00 a.m.. dth floor CorJWr t
Woroa Yiliclpal building, 100 Mill 1ve.
Sf the bard spry to the deferral, they will /t•bablY it.
filing of A Declaration of 9eetcictivg C:oveonte. thraler it
Ifyrt be ndytul !t you bravght with feu a legal d.acript
of the pm►e.ty. IN, entl.ae . cop) of the cityr0 tote for bs
Dsclaratloo.
Il you have i9 q.rtla•a. your may tell We •ttlu.
V"' truly
Yarran C. C. &Vam. Chairman
bard of fW 1Ir Yarn.
YiY tj[
,.^ YTclo.ute
Y..
ti {i{
` 33 IIIJ, RR , i
l
j Al 1p
s I15 3 `j� offt j jl
I its
®rlp
� ii qq
�4 l'r
i 1
• s
Y � w
p(Cl e4tll De QI A It 1jq C. iWii E,, ',,1Ny it
1 .
..14Nl ter a
In P, ,Mo• et IN 4'INIq nol ennrl! le W tly at&Moen. 4a.
t...11 ae Ib,. dale of aNU qIM. aMlr1
A ltsm."d Nnl•
y' IMY4. Lee NNrU) Ll ult aN Vleae erNertr tNIN p L. t
y" IyeN tN rellute/ "Itme11N N•e•NN nNlet NM ty lka M, f
! 16 M,. „e Net N, gtve, oe Na yen aeeo'M, net aMNn,.
MII. IMM,atl, toe ebmMa ra,Ma eeey) e.ty/4".
� I
"..1 Mo Inn, nitrlellm ua baeaoate r iial NM toe tare
Mn Uy1n NIerlMa.fO mNH 11 Ve N y W MMalg,t/.
Mol• "Cause". bVt. Net n•IN. N Wake, '1
t
' ntraµulN ar nr•s:n Il�el,"!'LIL
❑e MI,It) of tams yen Maoleaa In„l,. Nel, ,ea-
eewen. I H,. Ma NNN•. MMr etm ,.a ft e t M
inr1'er Nl, 1e, t1N . a.UUN I. "'u., •,.ery•,MN
_ aer ret,n tell' I,en•onel 0111116% ILI$) M 614 /oNla-
IaJ ,renal. Na e4 1601, h1I aaen liftmen. Mr IM
. ,•11e446 •1 ,*.lot., IN MMna., P1-,ly /MnNr4
n,elna t; Q. Veee. IyaNryrN 0n1.NN, told"Nee..
rh Meta rll let lrae ,e1 M, nl M 11NtN le W IMWiF
11e•of wm• N.:en. "doulte. .t•N1 eN'ai, #800" 3
Neon. !Nn .eM." of N/11/IN. Ma F
ltml 11 Ntle,. CA
IMet N•N,.I. en lno•ea b tie. 1,HNIM
of Nu, 1, It tn,...., plot, at INS City N ow"16�
J
..o i
r14 N• I4.4 .N •wlrl I.
�.'.,i YH NNr !'. INI I• .\ \y UN IMY+NNU Iq
INIr11010 1.,....1 1. IYw CIY...II. 1. 1 r
NrIIN 11 . .
\y Iw I..N•al Mr41uY a tN 1N11I1 IN41 b1 IynN I
Mll N r1•rllN .f to, 9r11 N.{.1 .1 IN t11! •1 4NN " \h } M'
♦ 11111 to W."4 r11N.1 ^
NHIII I/ .I /VIN. N•MNItIN. " R".7 ..�
Yp r411\IM O \nw• •I lNw nHrl.ly. uw•NU N9 N �,.�1.
0-f1nN •i 1ry1r 1 .1
M YrNIMN 4 W Iy.r+4+ f.Mt It tly ti+'
�.- f1Nl/ 1f 111wf IM t110 J waN fr ..
s 1f.Nrt! flYlwll r11111y
+1w1 1nN.if Y11 •f. •1N...1 •ff
r, ! a:Nb .:41Nw. Q
e
•s t1111 of YMIINTMI
l CMI, M IIr
0• Uq � q! 11 �. I boos,,,,,boos,,,,,r
1 ' \�
11...w 11! 11111N � Id •• �f..f :y)l"+��llv . �a
11. 11nN4) YN oNrtM 1N rI1N. W f.rylly l�11A11. M•
N1rw IN111 w10 lo\+rflN\ 1. N tN fn. N• MI~# w/ W -
110,1141 N NI• NnNl.l 1rr lw rw. W Nrl.••. Iwn11 amt r .
11 1III1,I61 ,rwP. 1 N+. wnNl1 •1t ti NN W 1Nlyos y t
441i4141 .NI tN NI .N .... fill\ .w. wnw. /+ p
sl wN/yt11. n•111M N
t
}
f• i
1
i
.� was 1 M 16, yglrlw. ►Wt 1. C. s. 411�r'a ypy►
t Imlowe /e as ciq N 4Mt►a, Maw►ae 01, w raaw6/ r ►N Il
'1 at ►tew. MN /a. uy Oat♦q. %*Memo, mm" tmt pttW at
lwa l u M Y "Ad uwa I. l►► s aWw!► H a Ilea►�rallaJ ti
aw " twa ""a" w 11. Nam arwwet at 11Mt 4%im mot"
aaitalll law we hL ►lea wr of ►rieer7 ta.w a&~ 0. �
a' at tih► ttr.M to W M ome .
SWAB
4i
.1
� I
r t•
r:
OF R6
U i BOARD or PUBLIc woRKs • Ran-ota.wAsmu4aron
xt1.4" SMY . MntOn.•.s '(N.m11 a6•tIM
} •
Jun. 1!, U)9 � �•''
4.
y 11r. Jam
es iron.
ot eau Valley IRoadMw# Motor, eft 90055
M. R•eu•.t for E.u,t ion In ton! Maul roartt
'a AIn1Wr•tqu.n, :1)) tut valley boo k '�
Mar At. Uoke
The toeN Of ►Y611c Wrka, at Its wlin0 Of hou Ij. U70.'/N
Agree to mire Its r•aulranent on the ao/Iticeal 011,000 s
aeno for the deferral of off-site lmmtoacets At the etswo-
reference/ facility. .
If you he" My wmtlone. ►laaee NIT this office.
Very truly
ce,, Cm
rr•n [. iorvueonrulraen
"or. of ►YPI Ic Works
k
MNJ�nf�i�v
PUBLIC NARKS OEPAgTMENT
ft Ratk C GOMAeON. I P a owectoa
F r Mt,r♦.awlosa gob""" W "aMI"a.1a waft.He No NOW
Gwuill� p'�uaNrn
Wrea
",1�"ar to, Iola 1
t
ar. .1oan stow
1111 t. Aw1te else I 4
io"Iam. lit Betel
Ir: MArnl of N.•ltt" imp, kMIrKNrye. I t
Get Valle lltahW, e.W, fist et., l.l. el&U.
ad S.W. tri e .
our R, Items
a eeteeior a. Tole tM bow of/ylla Irrte "Bleed to ia1b.
off.elto teat orowto w th" tat "I1N.w for•Ia"tei o►aft
ywr eeeJ"ct M�eetlq of too nw1rN Mai, eai to win me If
or"~te oa I. Clot St. eY S.W. tav IR, Y the�eq 101 of r"trlctt"cowlwte. aMth Yw how eI=*smW MN. r
The 40"t of it* said reaolni hog b ""&listed at$UAW& t "
PI"&" Mat " Mai to this toot With this office.
If ra "w any ""class, Ploo" cols 1*16 office,
i
very trrly ywn, t.
wrwe C. eM"lalod, ►.t.
Qolt�an - e"N of ►;sbl<c Wr4s
cc board Nwb�rr
I
MEMO F"( CITY CLERK'S OFFICE
,
PATE:
RE:
MEMO:
THANK YOU,
J. Ralph Gilbo f
Red Estate Appraiser 6 Consultant
--._— I ISUN.93aSIREET
SEATTLEAASHINGTON 98103
PHONE. R0a1 SL 1143
June 1, 1994.
Mr. Lawrence J. Warren
City Attorney, City of Renton
100 South Second Street
Post Office Box 626
Renton, Washington, 98057
Re. Appraisal Considerations
Broadacres Property
Parcels 29, 78, 79, and
80.
Renton L. I .D. 314
Dear Mr. Warren,
As you requested I have made a specific study of the
effects of the L. I .D. 314 improvements on the subject prop-
erty.
The property is sole and unique in the L.I.D. 114 area.
In comparison to the other ownerships it is very large, over
45 acres of which are in the L. [.D. 314 boundaries.
Unlike the other properties in the L.T.D. 314 area
approximately 63% of the land remains more than 600 feet
from a public dedicated and improved street. The nearest
public street , S.W. 27th Street , abuts the subject land by
means of a dead end at approximately the center of the east
boundary. The improvements to this point are full and
complete.
The access and availability of utilities is considered
to be adequate for development to its highest and best use
Of approximately the easterly 600 feet of the tract. This
portion of the tract would have all the amenities required
for full development , including excellent access. Short
internal road systems are commonly a part of a development
of this size.
There is approximately 1040 feet lying westerly of
the easterly 600 feet which can be considered to benefit
less as a result of L.I.D. 314 than the easterly 600 feet
of approximately 16,S acres. vor this large western
portion to develop to a higher and better use it would
require that the owner provide at his expense a complete
and fully improved extension of S.W, 274 Street to obt :n
full and satisfactory access to the whole tract.
For this reason I omitted consideration of sales of
the F.arlington Golf Course land in my appraisal of January
11, 19843 on the effects of L.I.D. 314 on land values in
the general L. I.D. 314 area. The golf course land had
access at points to streets and utilities but would require
a great deal of internal development at the owner's expense.
The westerly 1040 feet does benefit considerably from
L. I .D. 314 but not as much as the typical parcel enjoying
frontages.
Benefits to the western portion consist of the new
proximity of streets and utilities by the extended S.W.
?'th Street . This availability makes the land more valuable
and more readily and fully useable.
It is pertinent that my definition of the benefits to
the land from L,I ,D, 314 in all cases are those which
accrue as a result of the difference in fair market value
between the before L.I .D. 314 situation ar,' rho completed
situation. These two situations im"ly an informed and
willing seller and like buyer. Benefits should not be
considered as to whether they exist for the present owner
for his present use.
I recommen,I that in this special situation the easterly
b00 feet of the tract be assessed at 1001 of the typical
assessment and that portion of the tract westerly of the v,i%t
600 feet he assessed at 611, of the typical assessment . on
an overall basis this calculates to an assessment for the
whole tract of approximately 7St of the full amount .
Very truly/ yours ,
410 � 44
,I, Ralph Cilbo
�f
J. Ralph Gilbo
Real Estate Appraiser a Consultant
1150N 93r4 STREET
SEATTLE.WASHINGTON 98103
PHONE (2061 523 1143
June 1, 1984.
Hr. Lawrence J. Warren
City Attornev, City of Penton
100 South Second Street
Post Office Box 626
Renton, Washington 9805'
Re: Appraisal Considerations
Cartield Associates, Ltd.
Parcels 24-D and 24-I
Renton L.I .D. 314
Dear Mr. Warren,
As you requested I have made a specific study of the
effects of the L. I .D. 314 improvements on the subject prop-
erty.
The subject had improved street frontages before L.I .D.
S14 but is in he affected area. The fact that the benefits
may be somewhat lower than those fronting on new fully im-
proved streets has been compensated for by a lower proposed
assessment .
The entire surrounding area has been upgraded reflect
ing in higher values for the property. This was proved by
the use of many comparable sales. Especially important is
the now adequate area-wide storm drainage which prior to
L.I.D. 514 was a serious factor in inhibiting development
of the area. Surface and subsurface drainage From the
subject property contributed to the problem.
It is my opinion that the fair market value of the
subject will increase by an amount considerably in excess
of the amount of the proposed assessment .
Very truly yours,
d.4102#4 LA-.
1. Ralph Gilbo
J. Ralph (Abo
Real Estate Appraiser 6 Consultant
'~ Il%% 93xd STREET
SEATTLE,WASHINGTON 98103
PHONE (2(%1523.1143
June 1 , 1984.
Mr. Lawrence J. Warren
City Attorney, City of Renton
100 South Second Street
Post Office Box 626
Renton, Washington 9805'
Re: Appraisal Considerations
A-Economy Storage
Parcels 16 and 1'
Renton L.I.D. 314
Dear Mr. Warren,
As you requested I have made a specific study of the
effects of the L.I .D. 314 improvements on the subject prop-
erty.
I appraised the effects of L.I.D. 314 on two specific
parcels (41 and 41) east of East Valley Road on January 11,
' i for the City of Renton. The conclusion was that not
' r parcels 41 and 43 but also the entire strip east of
.I valley Road including pai =el 44 (Jonathan's Storage)
th rly to the end of the strip benefited to a lesser
0V 4 fr,,m the effects of L.I.D. 314 than the typical
:-<t of Fast Valley Road,
n st . Jying the subject parcel it is reasonable and
.I rin a to extend the same conclusion to this property.
1, 1, •oved with a storage facility similar to Jonathan's
ai,d -ts possibility of a higher and better use is inhibited
4.n the same reasons.
The subject property does benefit from the improvements
but not to the degree of the adjoining lands .
The L.I.D. 314 improvements upgrade the entire
neighborhood. The storm drainage is especially important
and like all others in the area the subject has contributed
to the problem by lacL of adequate facilities for handling
its own surface and subsurface drainage.
Very truly yours;
J. Ralph Gilbo
TO: Public works Department
FROM: City Clerk
RE: L.I.D. a Protest Letter
or Petition
we forward herewith protests as above.
referenced. Please tabulate Percentayaa
for report to Council at Public Hrarinq
to be held on this matter on ��,
June 4, 1984 O
Patricia Ann McIntyre Ma i �+•I '
John Powers
Frank Powers ----�'�
CITY CLER
To: City Clark
City of Renton
Subject: Local Improvement District 314
Request: Reduce Property Assessments
We request the Rs •.ton City Council to review and to reduce the
aaeasaments on certain properties within the Local Improve-
ment District 314 ( LIJ 314) . The lots in question are
Lots 16-25, Block 22: Lots 34-40, Block 22, and Millman■
earlington gardens Division M1 (less the State Freeway Prop-
erties) .
These lots were included in the LID 314 for assessments but
their single access road, Maple Avenue S.W., received no
improvements. Our question to the City Council is why are
we being billed for benefits not received.
we were under the impression that an LID was a means to obtain
local street and utility improvements in a concerted effort
with all the work completed in a uniform manner at one time.
As stated before, Maple Avenue S.W. received no improvements
when the LID was under construction.
At some time in the future, each property owner on Maple Avenue
S.W. will install sanitary and storm sewers, underground
electrical service, side walks and curbs, and paved streets.
It will be a mixed bag of construction as each property other
will be responsible for the contractiing and funding of the
improvements. An LID presented itself as the beat wa, out
of this impending hodge-podge but the owners on Maple Avenue
S.W. were left out of the plan.
Maple Avenue S.W. is in the same state as it was before the
LID was begun, however the property owners are a?sessed ;the now .
5.23 per square foot as those property owners on S.W. 16th
street. S.W. 16th street has curbs, sidewalks, underground
electrical wiring, etc. because of LID 314. This aicuation
in very unfair.
we are certain the Renton City Council sitting es the Board of
Equalisation will see the inequities of the situation and make
the proper adjustments in property assessments to reflect the
lack of improvements on Maple Avenue S.W.
Patricia Ann McIntyre John Powers crank
v
jfs r,�o��ra
.I..L.•. ..W l.1L... L1.3lt.11.�
l.li! ..\+ r+.,. ..w�...•. I,lv 41+1 tL\..1 '1,. ((,yy'... �Ll it i.
... ! t•. ,.l 1 Jr I+y aA . �. ! u.11 _.lr 1' .:...,1a
....., 1w IL 1... . ,.... ...'..t W
Jl�-'. .at. .. L..l ..ax..\. bi u41 /•aa ..t Ly
.,L 11.r (cuaagtl, LU( Gll( cA+74.:.11u.., C� llil aJ.UW:[ OL LI., .. ..a.,;,,d,.L:
L l...u. ; ,L. iL,, jl.ld L.Wy,JVL,LjU, lil Li•1:. LMltl(.
IAL11i% ♦ --�'v.
I CITY CLERK
TO: Prblic Works Department
PROH: City Clerk
Rt: L.I.D. a 314 Protest i.ettvr
or Petition
_ Olympic Pipe Line Company
-----------------------------•- .......................
We forwa.d herewith protests as shove-
referonced Please tabulate percentage•
for rep . to Council at public Hearinq
to be held on this matter on ]y+ne ;
P
OLYMPIC PIPE LINE COMPANYfoe 1W
•O aOM:>I U a[NTOM.N.IMINGTON,..,,
CITY GERK
June 4, 1964
Ms. Muine E. Motor, City Clerk
City of Renton
Renton Municipal Building
Renton, .ahington 99055
RI: J1 m is PIPe Line Cos en - 06 actions to Revised Finmj.
r_+asessment Roll for LID- ].
Rat Ms. Motor:
On April 9, 1964, Olympic Pipe Line Company submitted a formal objection to
our assessment under the Final Assessment Roll for LID 314. Our letter of
objecticO detailed a history of the LID's development and stated speclf is
objections to the handling of the LSD and aaaeasment technique..
We have now received a new assessment notice based upon the Revised Final
Aareessent Roll for LID 314, which indicates our costs have ncreased by 672
from the 1982 estimated assessment, while the project costs nave increased by
only 131. This current assessm, -, in lover than that presented in April of
1984, but our increase from 198- ....,icates that the cone-end-terminil
methodology used to initiate the project in 1982 is not being employed in the
final assessment.
It is our understanding that the City has adopted a fourth method for calcula-
ting nssesaments within this District. Property east of Fiat Valley Road is
being assessed at a lower level than property located to tie west, based upon
a partial appraisal of -roperty within the District. All other property is
being assessed on a square footage basis within a 600-foot corridor divided
inb two 300-toot zones, with the 300 feet adjacent to an improved strut
ass"aed at a higher level. This last assessment technique 1s more equitable
than that used in April of 1984, but does Oct same as a17. property equally and
in accordance with the special benefits gained. This technique is also at
variance with the technique used in 1982, prior to the City ordering the work
to proceed.
Olympic must, thereforc, reiterate its objection to the final assessment roll
for LID 314. Our objections are as follows:
1. She final assessment roll and the entire procedure utilized by the City
with respect to LID 314 has been founded on a fundamentally wrong basis.
Ms. Maxine E. Motor
June 4, 1984
Page rwo
2. The final a..jessmeae of our property does not reflect the actual special
benefits gai,.ed by our property from the entire LID improvements.
3. The final assessment of our property does not represent a proportionate
share of the total LID assessmenta.
The City has shitted its assessment approach for the fourth time with respect
to This change is unfounded and improper in that:
1. It means that property owners have been m_elzd by the entire preliminary
assessment process. Had the prelislnary assessment roll been advatced on
the beefs of this method of assessment, there may have been sufflc:ent
protests to divest the City of jurisdiction to proceed with the LI':
2. The concept that the City can initiate an LID on the basis of a prelimin-
ary assessment roll that utilizes one method of assessment for the LID,
order the work, and when the work has been completed, completely change
the entire assessment method of the LID, in furdamentally incorrect and
improper.
3. The current assessment method means that our property will bear far more
than its proportionate share of the total assessments for the Distr!ct.
The changes in assessment techniques four times, the use of a limlLed zone
concept for assessments, and the use of an incomplete appraisal technique
for differentiating between properties east and seat of East Valley Road,
is fundamentally erroneous.
In summary, we object to the City changing the entire assessment method
utilized for this LID for the fourth time. I doing so, the City is funda-
mentally wr, g, and the result is a total subversion of the nreliminary
assessment process. The final assessment roll does not reflect the special
benefits received by our property from the LID Improvements, nor does the
final assessment of our property constitute a proportionate share of the total
LID assessments. The discaiding of the original zone-and-terminii assessment
method where street improvements are Involved, and at the final stage after
use q it for the preliminary assessment roll, is clearly misleading, inconsis-
te. ., and improper, ..nd does not reflect acv attempt to assess our property in
accordance with the special benefits obtaineo "rom tie LID improvements.
Very truly yours,
r '
R. C. Meadows
Vice President/Manager
4CM:dc
IOCORRJI
b80484
Tuceon, Az. 25'4110
C,+y e1u,.k of 'R:,,ton
Renron , u;e. 9%os'+
1 wish to known my O�ec-dons to
k3+e p`�Se�rrnen� Pi u I e d o n rT (W)UPOJ+� LotS 34 SS'81( 71 on)
Lode I6- e5 Alk 1� on N&O. e.-`-Du+►�. •� Fnuc awnrcd tlaa�
C%6M t11a GSS�YK.n+� 1'vJ•uCn ��tnnri
�r1 S51JG � ire 7hA �.r�e on ewt. Sou+�.
clU�c. �.rY.(.Y+ove en�� uC ��- e1554es6Plx�tt" a.r�
W(A 4v know LD
w�� �� np �yy�o Uemr�a haLn rr�adt
1 Tho.nk�ou,
W5"'�
I�ol MA rs.� -, III
L� ` CITY CLERK
TO: Public Works Department (Don Monaghan)
FROM: City Clerk
RE: L.I.D. a 314 Protest Letter
or Petition Garfield Associates
--------------------------------------------------------------
We forward herewith protests as above-
referenceJ. Please tabulate percentages
for reoort to Council at Public Herring
to be held on this matter on June 4. 1984
cc: Dick Houghton
GARFIELD ASSOCIATE' LTD.
P.O. Box 800
Renton, Washington 9K -
[NAT , d. ,,04 i
May 26. 198<
CITY CLERK
Renton City Council
Renton Municipal Building
Renton, WA 98055
Attention: Maxine Motor, City Clerk
Dear Ms. Motor:
Re: Protest to Final Assessment -
Lip 314 - Garfield Associates
Enclosed will Le found original and five copies .,f Garfield
Associates' Protest to the above named final assessment.
Will you please place the original on file and distribute the
copies to the members of the Council so that they may have
them before them at the hearing scheduled fa dune 4• Please
also advise the Council that Garfield will aN.)ear at the
hearing and request that its assessment bt deleted or in the
alter,iative its assessment be draatically reduced. Failure
of the City Council to pro%ide protestant appropriate relief
may force it to challenge the assessment method in the courts.
Yours truly,
...�� V�ltvPv�_
eep ne Frandsen
General Partner
WLT:jg
Encla. - Orig. 4 5 Protest
cc: Ms. Shi.ipoch, Mayor
BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF RENT)N
NOTICE OF PROPOSED IMPRL.EMENT, )
LID 314 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL, ) NOTICE OF PROTLST
AND HEARING THEREON ) OF GARFIELD ASSOCIATES
Garfield :asociates. 200 S.W. 34th St., Renton,
Washington 96J55, owners of Lots 4 and 9, Block 1. Burlington
Northam Orillia Industrial Park, Renton #I, protests the
Revised Final Assessment against the -,foresaid property in
the amounts of $64,432.61 for Lot 4 and i63,610.07 for Lot 9,
on the following groucd3:
1. Failu •. to Give Notice of Hearinas on
otiose ..mnrovaments
Although Garfield Associates have been the legal
owneru of the aforementioned property since 1979, no notice
oi hearing wen j!ivon on LID 314 until the receipt of Notice
of Revised Assessment Roll and Hearing Thereon dated June 14.
198R (received May 29, 1982). Thus the taxpayer w>' deprived
of due process of law and equal protection of law by failure
to give it an opportunity to appear and oppose said project
at City Council hearings held on November 10. 1979 and
January 7, 1980.
2, h n e o A essme t Ratios Without
u ear n •
Garfield is informed and belioves that subsequent
to the December iP. Ig79, public hearing, the then public
works director me; with certain protesting property owners
located on the east side of the East Valley Highway and arr-
anged to charge the method of assessment so as to reduce
the amount of their assessments and thereby throw the ,greater
ehare oC the cost on the property owners lying west of East
Valley Highway, all without notice of public hearing. As a
result of that procedure, protests to the project were
either withdrawn or not filed so as to pereuado the City
Counall that the project should be appraved at its January
7, 1980 public hearing.
Garfield is i.n%rmsd and believes that subsequent
to the June 14, 1982 publl,: hearing cm the estimated revised
assessment, city officials again decided to change the method
of assessment so as to reduce tht amount. of assessments to
property ,wners located on the east side of *he East Valley
Highway and thereby throw an additional greater share of the
cost on the property owners lying weat of the East Valley
highway, all without notice or public hearing. This second
change of assessment ratios was made to ameliorate protests
Of the east aide property owners at the experre and dt2triment
Of the west side property owners.
3, M tfiof Dets a}, Aasoessent Chanties
h �
The above diseribed changes in the method of aasess-
ment were arbitrarily and Capri isly deterrined and not made
on the basis of benefit, but rather as a part of an effort to
relieve protests, thereby Illegally imposing an unfair
share of the cost of the project onto Garfield and certain
otners.
In addition the present method of assessing is
inequitable, arbitrary and unlawful, in that it imposes a
grossly disproportionate amount :i the cost of the improvement
on Garfield as comparwd to ether properties that clearly
benefit as much or more from said improvements. The City's
appraisal on which the change In assessment was predicated
assumes a fallacious increase in value to protestant's pro-
perty by reason of LID 314 improvements. Protestant's pro-
perty already had the improvements being furnished by LID
314 by reason of improvements to Lind Avenue. S.W. 34th Street,
S.W. 'let Street, ono S.W. Ord St:eett i.e., sewer, water,
gutters, curbs, sidewalks, catch basins, lighting, etc. 't
should not now be req,.ired to pay for improvements that only
benefit others. Yet its assessment was increased more than
60% while property fronting on the improvements which gained
the benefits had their assessments reduced.
At the same time, property lying immediately adjacent
to Garfield of the approxi.,ate same size (benefiting no more
or less than Garfield from this LID) is assessed substantially
less than Garfield.
4. Prayer for Relief
Protestant Garfield requests that its assessment be
-3-
deleted or stricken and its property reassessed on the basis
of its true benefit (if any) to is derived from said LID.
Duted May 24. 1984.
GARFIELD ASSOCIATES. LTD.
Protestant-y rq ep ne Fran
dsen
/IL saa,
..�u4
Kftnneth Frandsen
General Partners
-4-
TO: Public Works Department (Don Monaghan)
FROM: City Clack
RE : L.I.D. a 314 Protest t.etter
or Petition
J• E• rri on
--- ------------------------------------------ ----------------
We forward herewith protests as
referenced. Please tabulate percentages
for report to Council .t Public Hearinq
to be held on this matter on 614184
/cr. Dick Houghton
/SAY 9/ , i9B4
ra ' Cl rY OF RFMrOA/
C/ ry CCF•QKJ OFF/Ce
200 W,/ z vvr So�rW
REA/roN , Jvq 9e0s5
SV6✓EGT oQ,/ECr/ON ro RFv/3E0 F/4AL ASSESSMruT
RC44 FOR c !D 3/4 ( C/uf / rcM MO . G 49 .
Re FERFA(CE A-rrER DA rED APARCW 29, (llV , J,F. MVw.IiaOw
ro RSA rnA/ c•ry C4"K — S�84elr OI✓4Gr/IA/
rO F(AW4 4354a3mF,vr 4.11 A•O4 Ar0
pLtASF BE ADVISED T4AT S A"FaY OB✓FCT ro
+ Y PR ePt-t>y !F/A..G "Ce.UDFD /A/ THE A33B33~A/r
R OCL FoR LSD 3/it FoR rfFF Feccew/ug RFASeA/.r -
l• M � f/RepERry /3 :o CArF•D eu ArAic!' Ave Jw ,
/re T OA/ JW /G sW Jr4 ear T -
z . tWF4E /f43 BETA/ A/O JC• " 1 , uo Ulp1 wA reW �A•/A/
NO Cv. 405 J Al0 C.v r TE+e3 ) A/O .7/0FWAL&S 1 u0 AAf%V
JrrFEr J_i6Nr3 ) NO A/FW AA./Yry/i(d /u•rACL 60 ~
MAOcE AV.- JN/ /u T,YE" wc/A//ry •F my 040P4rfrr.
TNESE / rE'/h 3 WERE pe/A/ rcn 0&1 /u � y R!A"FRJFA/CE
4*1rrE,Q A.vD rNE 0A 4Y .QFSPoA .Se I RECtryvFD �A.S
aA/ /A/CREA3E OF 0/00e As3F33ED
RGA/U3 r /ri y Paopf.e ry
S Wea/LD ApPR e'C(A rF A WR/rreAl Aff3/b,A/a J; rT'
TW/S LF rr ER JTA r/A�� Wvhfy OF/,(AS
/+1AOF WNEA/ VO /M vAOvF/WnWr3 JVF4F MVt)F /A/ rVC
v/C/A 'rY OF ny 1-4cPF4ry
RFSPFC rRuacy J�A./rrFp/
her 28 j 29 B(K 2/ f I'r AM*D/�
N((tmpAN lYe.fuuirp tpos�uJ rl JE roaw s�aeu
/e!Z MAO(Y' Avr JW
QFA/roA , w^ gloss
TO: Public Works DeAsrtnent
TPflo City Clerk
R8: L.I.D• s _. Pt*teet Letter
or Petition a�
---------------------------------------
we forward herewith protests as above-
referenced. Please tabulate percentage•
for teport to Council at Pub2i Hearing
to be held on this matter once y
MNI S(W1hxeu 311h Slrl49•Rr nhm, lAnhmghv 98U55•Ietephorte 120h)251-SODS
May 30, 1984 i r P
ffAl 1, iA 'O
I
CITY CLERK
The Honorable Barbara Shinpoch
Mayor - City of Renton
200 Mill Avenue South
Renton, WA 98055
RE: Objection to Proposed Assessment
LID 314
Dear Mayor Shinpoch:
Superior Past Freight received Its third Notice of Public
r.,V ... ed . . .Yl.( ,- 1 . ..'e k"w ,I ff 1..Y.
nt.tt noti tl„q hiss w,u� t,�l welJvJ t,.. out leglv,lal Dill,, In lama,&
waking noto tlwt our asaesemont had Wvu reduced. Superior Iwo
objected u its being assessed for LID 314 since the 1982 public
hearing and must resubmit for your consideration the following
facts which we, believe clearly indicate that our company receives
little, if any, benefit from the LIU so outlined.
Prior to the first hearing in 1982. the offices of the Engineer
and Clerk, City of Renton, were visited by a reprraentative of our
companv. He was advised that approximately fifteen feet of
Superior's eastern property line fell within the 600 foot assessment
rights of the city. Considering such a small portion of our property
falls within the assessable area, it is hard to rationalize, let
&Iona visual .a. what benefits we would gain as a result of this
LID since fifteen feet on the east portion of our property line only
encompasses our fence line and landscaped property border.
Improvement's identical to those required by LID 314 were
completed on our property at V - time of initial construction as
a requirement for issuance of our Certificate f Decup&ncy. Following
Sen,na Onaon a Aashmgion s Idaho. Aiaaka. Aestern Canada hom Southern Caldomw and Alan"
11mbound srr•nr to reen from Southern Caldornu
The Honorable Barbara Shinpoch
May 30, 1984
Page Two
is a list of the improvements required and completed, costs
incurred, and -.he coat of LID's (i.e. 302) that were assessed
against us.
Assessment of $121,904.69 under L1.. 302 for improvement
of Southwest 34th, South 41st and Lind Avenue. This
assessment covered the same basic improvements as re-
nutted by LID 314, except Lind is the primary arterial
route used by our company.
B. Wate main and fire hydrants -- Installed at a coat
of $41,878.66. A latecomer's agreement wes approved;
however, Stoerior has only regained a small portion of
that iastallation cost.
C. Curbs, gutters and sidewalks -- As identified below:
1. City sidewalk, curbs, and gutters were installed
on Southwest 34th, including asphalt paving at
railroad tracks and installation of a drainage
catch basin ($3,569.00).
2. City sidewalk, curbs and %liters were Installed on
Southwest 29th, the northern border of Superior's
property - ($3,063.00).
D. Catch basins with pumps -- Two catch basins were required
as a part of initial construction to retain all run-off
from industrial wash products used on our equipment.
(Lust - initial construction cost cannot be segregated).
E. Oil separator tank -- Baffled holding tank required at
the maintenance shop to collect any oils or deoris from
our steam cleaning area. This tank is cleaned semi-annually
to comply with Metro Industrial Waste discharge limitations.
(Cost - $3,111.00).
F. Unit ry sewers -- sewers and storm drains were
installed conformi,.,, to all requirements set forth by
Washington Standard Specifications as approved by the City
of Renton.
The Monnrable Barbara Shlnpoch
May 30, 1984
Page Three
As one of the first companies to recognize the potential
of the valley area, Superior Fast Freight, as well as others, have
bore the cost of as-at of the initial improvements in o4r area. To
date, these foregoing assessments have been paid withayt protest,
realizing that for our industrial community to grow, we must bear
some responsibility for the coats of :mprovements; Mwever, the line
must be drawn somewhere.
Perhaps there was some justification for improving Southwest
Ibth Street to Lind Avenue; however, its impact on our business is
highly questionable since Lind Avenue and Southwest 180th have been
our main traffic routes for years based on dispatch routing to the
majority of our customers.
It is our request that our asaessment be dropped or at a
minimum reevaluated downward aFain, based on our distance from the
improved road network, its lack of beneficial Impact as an access
route to our compan y, snd the. amount of funds we have already
expended for site. and area improvement In the valley.
Sincerely,
SUPERIOR FAST FREi(;y1'
T r . French
Cor�ate Staff Manager
cc: S. D. Knapp
D. L. Castro
R. E. Potter
J. E. Carl
TO: Public Works Department
FROM: City Clerk
RE: L.I.D. a _'�/ - Protest Lett r
�,r Petition liter_-:1
--------------------------------------------------------------
we forward herewith protests as above-
referenced. Please tabulate percentages
for report to Council at Pub Maariny
to be held on this matter on �.
2Jou `1�rt�
P 0 if..6J1s J6)u L.': n.ylro.v ' .VaH.ii.ni.K..�.,,yi„ii'typ5:7a 151 gIW
RECEIVED
May 29, 1984 MAY 3 1
CITY OF RfN10N
C rf (pIyFLIL
Renton City Council
Renton City Hall
Renton, Washington 9,
Dear Council Members:
Dated April 9, 1984, 1 received notice of Final assessment roll
for L.I.D. 0314. The total figure shown ran $6,969,113.6o.
Tow pieces of property in my name are 062 and #63, with a
combined assessment of $20,472.66. Phis amount was high enough
but I would qo along with it rather than protest.
Now comes a revised final - ssesament for he.tring on June 4, 1984.
The revised total is now $ ,066,%"9.9G. an increase of $b7,4b6.30,
equaling a 1.2" hike.
My assessments were lncre.,sed $6327.21, ogtuiling a 3la htke.
Such a percen•age Increase is dlsproport usia Le in relation to
the total sseasment figure.
1 protest my 31% increase on the basis that the total L.I.D.
amount only increased
Sin rely,
Sew Yu ke
(Xim.mh el{/4'fIl
SA Hl7N0 fir 1'� .� � ) %1.,14«F 197E
I '* :j
ry H�
Public works
Departnant
FROM: City Clerk
RE: L.I.D. a 314
or Petition Protest Letter
Mobil Oil Corp
We forward herewith protests as above-
-___`__-
referenced. Please tabulate per centagea
for rePort to Council at to be held on this ma Public Rearing
tter on
cc: Dick Houghton 6/4/84
Mobil Oil Corporation „" °1~
ftNA! w•S.�.
May 31, 1984
City of Renton
Renton Municipal Bldg. =Cua�
Renton City Clerk,Maxine E. Motor
Renton, Washington 98055
LID 314
REVLSED MAL ASSESSMWr RaL
TOM TUMAL
Dear Council:
Mobil 0il Corporation, hereAth files a written objection to the
$25.4,009.26. assessment against the subject terminal property,
received in the Dallas Property Tax Division an May 14, 1984.
In 1983 the same LID 314 assessment as shown on our records was
$222,300.00 on subject tersinal pm*rty and no improvements have
been made since that assessment.
We believe this now assessment is cSsproportionately high considering
the assessment .against other similar Ilse Properties in the immediate
area of subject and apart of the I.ID 314, considering the benefits
subject property receives from the roadway improvements, water main,
fire hydrants, and street lighting installed under LID 314.
s ly,
.R. ll,
Tefmirals Manager
R. E. Weaklecd,
Real Estate Representative
REW:®
cc. T. G. Bowman
C. F. Lindus
B. R. Fox
C. E. 9vaim
LOCAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT WORKSHEET
IID NAME \NO NUMBER,
CREATED BY CITY COUNCIL ON January 21, 1980 1OATE1 BY ORDI NANCE.3396
P ;R�POSF,, SEE Attached "Exhibit A"
LOCATION, SEE Attached "Exhibit A"
TOTAL COST, £7,056.579.90
CITY PARTICIPATION, -0-
TOTAL ASSESSMENT ROLL, $7,056,579.90
AMOUN` OF PREPAYMENTS,
AMOUNT OF BONA ISSUE,
NUMBER OF ANNUAL PAYMENTS ON ASSESSMENTS, to
INTEREST RATE ON ASSESSMENTS,
RATE PER ASSESSABLE UNIT OF FRONTAGE .4NDiOR SQUARE FOOTAGE, Varies
ASSESSED VALUE ❑F LID, LAND $20,866,200.00
IMPROVEMENTS 39,365,200.00
T„IAL $60,231 ,400.00
DATE 30 DAY PREPAYMENT PERIOD EXPIRED,
NUMBER DF PROPERTY PARCELS IN LID, 92
TYPE OF AREA ANC ZONING IN LID, L-1, M P, G-1, R-1
PERCENTAGE DEVELOPED WITHIN LID,
ASS SSN NTS OUTSTANDING IN LID FOR OTHER LID S,
AMOUNT OF DELINQUENT ASS SSMLNTS IN LID FOR OTM R ID-S,
SIZE CF LID IN ACRES, 307.87 Acres
MAP OF LID IF AVAILABLE,
MAP OF LID IF AVAILABLE ,
CITY FINANCIAL INFORMATION,
ASSESSED VALUATION OF CITY,
OUTSTANDING BONDS,
GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS,
REVENUE BONDS,
LID BONDS AND NOTES,
BALANCE ❑F LID GUARANTY FUND,
EXHIBIT "A"
The project shall consist of the wideninq and improvement of East Valley
Road from S.N. 41st Street to S.M. 16th Street to 36 feet curb to curb;
the widening and improvements of S.W. 16th Street from Fast Valley Road to
Lind Avenue to 36 feet curb to curb; the construction of S.W. 27th from
East Valley Road to the proposed Valley parkway 36- and 44-feet curb to
curb; and the construction of S.W. 19th from East Valley Road to Lind Ave.
S.M. 36 feet curb to curb.
Improvements shall consist of surcharging, grading, paving, illumination,
curb, gutter, sidewalk, storm drainage piping, installation of water and
sewer pipinq, construction of a sanitary sewer lift station at Lind Ave.
and S.W. 19th, and construction of a traffic signal at Lind Ave. and SW.
16th.
y`.�ur Ip
- . . ...vr."� 54
• 7.
yp c.,�_: � . 3.i3d•K3
. ♦ LV,x49Ot1; ��J D-1i i,YJ4 � �o
` *dz
.�' f ^cm�
s
..
,:
t
1 M i
F1�1.d �v! �G•7�q��'
�.LJpiG. sad\ Q1�{ Ali. \YV V'n�' F^. 1A 01
_. coa
Asap...
h r?�l.O�l Go
y n
�C�
I
C
kno���. Cpth. /fSyr+>.'.c..: flies!Ir�ry lrF�
Avoli - :d {2'
YS,a<r/t G2 � 43
/-'AN�t4 4U o•6•
n
/Flop•,- Ow 6,a•P if 0•C
r3ecex :a
c
8,266.0300 +
7fj 7,291 .8400 +
16,266.9400 +
�•7.at'F+tlD , �10,532.9,00 +
1'.a,tt e2 171.O ry� 7,605. 3900 +
.w-" i54,U09.2600 +
""'':•gyp 6.279.7300 +
(
OCtrG �q,�' 3.586.7'100 +
Iy 64,432-6100 +
.S�dun LSD '�•� 63,610.0700 +
Mr-f" 25,297. 1 1 00 +
1.� 2,980. 3600 +
3.494•81u0 +
/�Aecaz ,k+t191 w 3, 136.4300 +
1 .658.00u0 +
/3<AI/P V 267, 386.0400 +
�A�Tco-2 �2 rrw)"•1u I ,.114.0a00
U4. 4.857.2600 +
Adtr c,no "a'w• 739,962• 1800
YA 12 CC2 ,t` b1 ,095.9000 +
973,a57. 3800
e4vv-W Ga•c-
P46crz- uS 973.457.3800
7, 056,579.9Uo0
AEcoNo..•�y- ShYLamE 0. 1380 +
�r2Z4 6 0. 1300
F3c..z 83 �BJ p�3' o•000u
CITY OF RENTON
�awal rMl far'Lecal lair MM D,Mnrl FAA, J1 . Curare M Ordlaeer tee.. A399.
leullra-:a 01dA.Ir rnrlalaa far tav lop...erol of EAST VALLEY aOAE _
From S.X. 16th St. to S.X. alst St.
and Related Struts
— -- —,
nuu a Jwnu 0[1Crrf10N M sea aarAii NORMAL
Nai
aaXor
a M1P'i�ALi .. r"yw 4 � 1► Alan1a11Mrlaf NeeaWeYT •rOYXT arOYel
1
':wi• `e we tivd. H,I1 Md'>.��/1 fjAM2t .1
ReIIt4l ll�9ADS�._ _.__. S SI.i
I
f. BAw a U000's Service lots 32• •3A �1M 21: _ 1
20B S.Y. lath Street Xtlllnes arl 1 pyn /1
Anton WA IBM
h •g,�7t AL---�.,
Anme aM --- — - -- — �,�
A.--- NeftbeCk. )OrrY,k_,___ ;lots 30.3C, ejk 29, _
21737 S.C. 259th Street _ ei llrans Eerlingtgn Gdrders Jl_ __ T
GM19H Yalli W 9A38._.. 6i$S.'am "!"dy r.--... ?.
S. lhirftbKkL JeM-L,._—._ WL 26..IVY 1?. 44 U.
737 I.E. Mt6 Street— Mtllnens E,erl gtgn Gardens e1 --
,0. Yzlly tM 9/078 LESS X 100 Ptl, LESS State Highway
I
—_6.. Kdroaceck, Lots i6 71ru 29, Ilk 22.
._— t r�2E9th.Stcwt bm EArl Vigton GaiOBn)7.,
e �
mr:'eTE�rk
7 fSefJ BAG.- ,.PS$.61A.1;!_ N1;IMp5 t9r11nitdd.. _ 9:d.6a3
leveland ON 44121 ._. - . ..'� _.
it _ 0111A a1.1433.I1..SOrx.iB.YaE:. .. .. -_ __.... . .
valley Ice t Ind. n w
nd. l4 B],tc 1pE3 24�.23 Yas.3sr9et
S.Y, 16th Sl
sa• oanac _ - .. Adjacent LESS.3"t, LESS State Jvy.
e 0 11
1 Ina. park
3t 6yrltSa rt�La1!d lots 52 Tnra S6, Blt 14._ dL.3a9
Cleveland 011 U121 — - -_-
-_— - __ Ea rlington 4-r!I^S-l1i i��gr
Y)1lty D:r1G_a Ind.._WsL__Vpc Street Ad1acegt,_kJ4$_+State nwj.
No S.Y, 16th Street
ok NOW
a 0 iG A Inc. Park
S. .._.M� �laaf v 1 Bcae ..Lots 4•5.6.7, 6419, 5.E71 } —...
pleveland QM 44121 Hlllivant EArl,ngton Gardens)1 _
_Ville O'ftcv t Ind. Pa^k LES
S State "IJh.1y
a00 S.Y. lain Sgteal
— _... _Anton
I;, . .Bailey. P.G. And PDX ilk 12,
alaa0ican, R.F. hi l loans EArlington Qrdans al
1p& 4e0 2SI91 a-9.10, a 49 Thru 51, _ -
.. LESS State 01gTwy
CITY OF RENTON
•ar�w lA fw'iw� lagno�oi Uu nei Nu .i4 ,'Ceaelae ib 4MreWa�..�......_.
[acura•n.ONuurr an,+uy br'A-lynvmael M. EAST ALLEY ROAD
from S.Y. 16tti`St. tu
and Ratatad Streets
OtS 10,10a1 OF Hat sun Ww. ^WeT
"A"t1aOW0 ..r-... _.. NMW1T M ParallelWTUUT
a.M{P♦E CO. u a1YfW OVAX .411OYYT .YOW1r
.111LIJ-31..Ytllasw Eulinglum
100ee Unim Sowre fi8We8A.11.LRt.4.,Clty of.AlntRn_.
-- An Af JN02264O10 59 5D
Is"ttlit
W, Gal--net..__— i • AlI pf !Voc El As 74 4 71 ►Y6:
n
VAlle
1
--__ dir .S-t�} Sye o} SY 16tn St
LESS `.tmis
1
r M A sociates u
_12_-__ �ttic 1rr.S. . SS1S. tf3O_• ..�i 1h9f.s.Ei�L! __ _1d7. .._.._
Seattle W 98188
._127.e87 IL -- - _ ----
.�CItY_Wll TLESS St
n"t
Mntm W 98055
6p.lr�r4 W .Por of 6.145..
eve ♦ pi u 4 .„;ltaynt Elrtir4e4n wraps Pl ?
'— ._e lley Office 4 Ind. Park 1 T„ru 6 A 'S torµ 72
_ _._. t S.Y. 1 n treat
eyy 1 tcce 1 Ird. Part
gYftelO
to
ma OH 44121 "Hillmans Grlingtdn Gardens el—wa _.
--`il?ly Offi t A 1A4'_►lit rUss state;
'am S.Y. Isro tMet
N 1_6_Y -,Lots 1 Teri 7 LLSS,SLRLt.H1grR,aT
lPade ind,strial Group A Lots 22 7nru.26 of 811,_1,.. _.._.—,.
__"ri(Sy1a}.rf eM, rzsl _HEllmans ERrbr4t� wrgeDs Pt ...._ _. - .__._.—.._..
17. Lots 8 Torµ 21, 41\ 1,
!Ke lnduttrtal frqu� SIgi1MR6 S�ilin4tm W dens�1 _
— —
1p01 H.F. hny e231 Aw Sine ni i�i.aY_.. .
ball~ MR HIM
c pe �R
N-2D.IL of R[ 44 of
Renton, WA 460ss _,.111i 1/4.lE5S State.Rilro4y.
LESS 51. 5HD.i•-to Eaed Over R OO ft.._
I
14. . _.MPuylt sound Pone, ► Ltgnt Co. sec. 37-23.•Os. HE 1.4 of SW )!4 4s4.45. -♦ - -
0.2at.Pomor Wilo,n2 LEIS N 70 Ft A LESS State Hi81nou
wllWYe W sw,) LM n 40 Ft Tt4f foe Strtet _
CITY OF RENTON
.a..w.i Mp Iw-�.l Iwwo.. ., eutnrt A. lit ,- L1nYNea by e.eteeear Ih.21g6
[euY.a-A.01&...c. ymaua Iv U. Iq,.n..Y el CAST VALLEY RlNO
fry S.Y. 16th St. to I.Y. Ilst St.
and Related Streets
nw1 p aw-s. MAM50N of 11r 1151411 Am~N mesa" 1 a
wev
Nleee�r gent a
a Ia1Y-+A,".i ._ _ � � .ue5r M M1 eeYMIR eaeelw"r
Sac 10-.1 . Or 0 7
[° an Be! 100 9(lq x 77y1.37 Stt lµgiaV- '� BL
"ItCfrap°7it5`;
Th
tt9 [[ —
' Srttle MA 981}1 •{2"�t2lyfy.u711O4 O Rp mey AA S
� ,il° i7YaRt
tSt ° pN,.26-5.7�12SMp fin Nr1mbi T
1 oil , 1 Ti�l�0Vsl 10i1
n
r:Q Prgmr& Tax QlvlBhtn.. rsIt for Bout of
_ j Dallas Tt IS
uUn°ton
the W
22. Burlfngty Nowlsm 4mous
Btift 6. it0" 1brtvAm lS6 189 7
._._...,1--. — .__t.. �..._ ... . .
IPro.. r Ta Old.nra IttltxaLathe W 14104
22. !Burlington x°rtrom 1, 81111.SCand-Devvlooment CotHat ►e Rgy I
„2gt-Lwtr•I Bpi tosni - ---fi -'
010 Ord Avenue
_. ..__TSattlr W 98104
24. 6locier Pirk fA —.d . 0,F?'bartRQe� E�U Ot xMtefa -
;34e.se°sLa� °fjLooi7°2°ISiL is aa�oot u u
_ —
_—. --r—
P6Wt SOunO Per A light_ CO �r�r�9�Q�Tp"0G Q� 0 ill ullHdrot�
y _^ -�41A.' 04
So 179.79 Bec SB SP ..__-...;.—
i_Pwoet Power u110in pal :ot Z.Blx 1.U 1&0 TM _. r _ -.—• --
Bellevue W gq;2 .12% —�
_.-_ .
26.
la» CO— _�1g5].110cf 1.. BYtll°9tgn ",tt 1MJe5- _
___�201 CMtml BIttl9Jgq, Orfllia IVY ir 11-1—i9M_Sg9.11� -----
Seattle WA BB101_
21. ,�grf leie_�Agsacfatl}_ltt. „lot a, Black 1,, Bgrlington N9!4tgSt .S±.a1i t',
_ A0. �0+ B00_ Ortitu In&SlrjAl Park Rtnty 11
200 S.Y. 1/te Stmet
Renton MR 0057.._
Orlllle.. Lot 5. Ill 1, &,rlmiton Northern
60100 TA Onll,a Inoustrtal Pam Renton al
Los Regales CA 900W
CITY OF RENTON
♦��Nal 11.11 Ion ,U"i I-pir mvis Muriel No. 714 l CmaJ as ONlamaea Y46 -
kaunN'.a O,a ,. P,.,,MW I.,1M lagr.....t at EAB? IA,LEI ROAO
From S.Y. loth St, to S.Y. alsl St.
and Related Streets
1aal,f 01 OwN(A DtiCIWIWa of dead FSrar[ aeaaYme N aMMYew Re
r - ---- - -- AW$4~ Pavow ` 1meWat
a IURtrAwt CO. r as rrno.n w aiaan Aft
OIL _
S■i1ra.Drilllt-.--- M"K 1.Burlmi;LRn kurteern._ 7.tL - _
►•O. Bo.441�_?A. ._-- lia.109YstrL1 Park A■r;.gtt11..
- ---
_._-. 30. _ urPleU a Associates Ltd. lot Ii�) 1 _n Northern- 6�,610. 7
1. Wr C00
2 Or1111a L a Park Renton. rl - -
�00 S.W.._3Ath Street
.-_ — ameses WA 9a057
]L__yl1n eteun ton Aarthrn_ _]0z.oa0
— �a. Bpuar
d rat BI
T.__. [tntnQ Bldg..__— tilt .Aenf�i�,1L... .__-'w...
810 3rd Avenue
Seattle W 96104
T I
32. 1 Uri f Eton NdrtNern-- Lot 11, Btk 1;,lorltngton k1r_rvMtrn
--- 1 � CorV. �Ori ilia_ 1Mu
Foe Central slog.
trtrl■l Park Nelson 11
-. .—_._tAlq 3rd Avenue
Seattle WA 98104
3L.._ laular.Pat. Co. --- !Lot 12. 0L 1.Awatdafon Ngrtoern ii.a'3 _.__.
_l20a Central Bldg. Ori111a Industrial Park Renton ai _ _ _..
hB10 3rd Avenue -_
._ ySeattle W 9e1M _..
3e. Glacier Park,fc9. _. `Lot 1,@lk j,_Byrhngton Northern ,:Jy,_,1+ _
Central Building _On111a lndustn.l Park Renton rl
iutilg-lM 9e19R __-
-_ I
35. latter Park Co. Lot 2, olk 2, Burlington Northern 211,37Q 27
Central Binding Onllie Irpustrul Park Rer4on II
e10 3rd Avenue ,
A. "Glacier Part Co. slot 3, Btk 2, Burtrllg rUe Northern R6.t41_ ;d _
4011 Central Building Ontlu Indusuul PaM Aentml rt
__—
---Y--'___- .._ - ._—.. .__ .._..
tl0 led Amen.;
'Seattle MA 96101
)7. PtA Co. __Lot�. -1n9-q ls. .. ton Northern .. og,11aA_
_
.. _._ �latle• . _U Contra` Bu,tldiq _Qnllia Indyscirtil Park Renton PI
810 3rd Avenue -
Seattle W 9BI04 _.. _.
38. PrudentlN irs. Co. lot S, alk,2. Buriingto hOrtMrn
aalp One unldn Spare oril`la Indmtrial Park Benton et
• sus University - -
Seattle, WA ga1J1 ..._.
CITY OF RENTON
A�•��•L R•li I•r't�aal l"nweaaa galdl Na. 414. -comm"M ONWr Na.. l)f6.
trwba'A•OHuue• r.•nUV t•.tN Ignnrut d EAST VALLEY ROAD _
From S.Y. 16tn St. to S.Y, alit St.
and Relateo Streets
NAAYI OF oM/1M COMMON bt l! w 0a•1At •a10YYT aln ra��`—��MST
7 _____ leTetlaT
a 1NMK CO. n� YNeewet aroYeT awwT
r Park Co. tot 6. Y1,r1.2, Bur);AM �ii
Eof central wild4M _ oriltia MStrial Part�Mia Il _
610 L7 AVen"
s«u•a w wla �_' I _�_ - -_ �
a0. 01 ier park CO,
_.. _ 2of central fuildi_�___,
Palo 3rd An"
Saute w 9f104
a__9dE.lII _..--- Lita_J�duii[L )datm.mcwem._ _tL17
iFl
4 GLL11L31FY-Sd 1 Y _�� ♦�tllrt Bd11td°.l].__ _ �.._ '
�m-11YMRtr �' at
P Fcft..'fl" Ei
1_�p3pQ�FS9t 9
ftt 2 So Uf0 N
t >W1r aP?,LW6�Q�]TI
42_.-r 1 _Clir4... _ .._ yo N5Epf1/ p(A1p00pppbAAP(�207tl�FTT Yn6g �[Sa.2Q 7SeL 1
- 'tit of Moan �fCpT10 v FT �°TAP g7BONF�T5E211f 48
9 1 __.
Yai1- .-- -if TH p214ct1.41 i$81�72.5[�SSNFTaN)C]]7TM . ..—t_.
_ _ ,�aB8° 9 7L=°-J7R 1,a TN N U_i9.
'Mnton w 96as N g�5, E ° __
_ 43.—_;fllDida[as.lRc, tp LR RA0 FR•rT ONE 5 5 A FTE5 368.95
_. . .HENRY�IEAN R pE r06 TAtR YT ND,I
rry
P.O. Box 60 Cat( 1 89 1p p �ES1 ---- --'i
..'ratan W 96055 A(SS�EpF SY 1'/ OFN1(pyE� /a[ GY 778 --- —
___ piyS[ /p p1 NY11/`YIrTTCC Yt foN P pRRR.
APT UR 1 4 r_
_----FLY P E -?--
---- ISLY OF So C
Mltwa WAw9B001ind OF SE 1/a iES$ .OF ,1. 1Ja
aa_ fuyat Sound Po�wr i Light Cal SEC 19.27-05 Y 1 STATE NiGNWY_„ _,
as. 9 n0w. _ 1w Ft-9f_l
_. "SEE-)0-$]jF.$,.N,
._ '_ - -
ton WA9fo56 �W li1 Ey]r of
Oly�pl�c�Mpe11a Co. Ia ley Yi�nwlNi�M_sx Sugi to Es9,,,,-,_ __._ --,--.
—'ETZ-SMtth "or WAR , F
_._._46�_�fMrY.1kr11s2.SStnSSrYSi19nE9A.SEC)931-A4. PgtIN 1L4_3f IF 114_.. . 1�11.71A A-
._.,. '-
_. ____..:86� EAYdiIttlJtss..SY -ly Yly of,i1W of friary State
lieettle J -$1_66._ _ Kith", PS4 I.r Ely.4f I NEn of
_.. a East Vallay oigNoay LESS.,4 lop Ft
Abu WMrs __.. SEC 30-.7.05, N 20o Ft AS Vaal A19 14.85, 91 . ... ._. _. .- ._.. .. .
_ __yLOC.SRYEL Mom Strut. Y to of Par of SY 114 of NE 1/4 ty -. —
.,Saattle W "I f Yly of Stitt Highway LESS Y X Ft
y
0
CITY OF RENTON
��,Kt bll Ina•heal IgrorWu Urunel N. J]E- :comw D dYdleeeGa
Fe.. -3196
eautld'A.Odi-1- endalV rn tN IuNa'eMKI A. `�'gM�16tn St. to S.Y. Il it St.
and Related Stmts
tl
aaenertYY+a Gana NUR MWAR M MNNNe urNNf
WA#JOF OWNS erWKW W r ,eanreK MfW MEt6MIN1* aaNeln
S IppTWGE [D. GaW
1 i Nk AL9I._A+ntriN .-- �
outn_ , 3�uL.t1.�.�/ --- __
6dpF_S 110 __. -Seattle W 961JB__ 1 _gf S _ "'- _ �I�••-�
L - ,f7f� SN 1; 9
hark Joint Wnert S} N 76 tgN a as i +-•
— 67 1]1typl _
S %South 110r� Stmt 0 0-111u�t o So N 11 t0� 1/`o -
� - 1
Seattle W Sam -y._
-'`--t "' '--'--NaM Joint ---
SEC 30-23 1-7 fe of,11 1f] F
gp, Mien _ --
Gomm South 110tn Stmt
,-_.- of S 106 t o N 2_of SY 1 1 of
Suttle W 961i1 NE 1 1 __-
uE 30_233 r N 1 2 of si v of 11.636
61. 1ounker,_-.996L-. g 1 Y f 1 1
�nKgyiick Ll.9it. ._.._-
_ �. eontA _ N�
At (East _ 1'.. _ _ _._ _
6 E of 92 A {[+st Y+11e 8oed _.
Nerlino Cultrugtt9B-Ct___. S.m �S. ._ 9f-� 1/p.of W.. _-_16,219
_ M70 ram"O".Crest.SN__ IL't-tf.NE tlLN SSA Por E of StIN . __.._.-_.�-.-.
_- L g ty Road a LESS _
SS. EMi9 Taylor Equipment Co. �g331Gi,�9!,of N 112 0l N 1/�._IdrOW
1Ht1eY 0.ad - M p0 Ft l
i_f 114 LY Yly of Freti�_.
-,Baotou W 98055 __
SI. Craig Taylor t4ui peenL Co. "SEC ]A-23 IS, it of Y 20D Ft l,,.5
100 East wileY Rad of felg•Po o!YN of N ll2 of NY
Meta WAR9Mkt1 _ 1/4 of SE 1/1 1'y of
-- LESS Stat -. _-j�._-.---i--•
55• a lNtl. .
--9 X4..L-33Ji--t11 1
4 Of
�i 61tn Ave._S. -T- - -
eCK7LtG
56. Ne nusa,_Ii--A'- SEC 30.2)-0S, Por ar S,.i/2 of NY iN N - -
----
91B Sgyt� 136tn S:. of S 1/1 L• Kly of State.Nl9Naq'
-- -- _- '--
Saattte W 9068 15 LEGS 5 191 Ft LESS Y 30 ft
__.:.-_..
--"'"•` tti, SEC 30.23,0g. M 1152.60 it of S 194
51, .3W East Valho Ft of NY 1/a of SE IA
-_,11.12 East Valley Road
Renton W 9605 _
CITY OF RENTON
A ..l Nall I.,gaW&I liarpa.eer.t DlMnfl Na. 114.. ;CnrM°be 47111MMeew Ne._ 739E ,.
N.uNN•A.DJMun rr.rlLV b,1he legonew.l of EAST ULM ROAD -
Froa S.N. 16th St. to S.N.-alit St.
and Related Streets
NAME Of OWhNt oucwmN OF 2m MAN Ali M N Mli
Wiaaltat
h MORTGAGL CO. «, r r 4fYe0M as Na Mea6611NNe AMYIIf &Nlelwt
$8. Jonetnans 0.enLOn NrtearMl SF�70•Y S 71 Ft Rt I�ii A
With-'.._ t
-_- Ei ntn Floor Pacific 81 N to Silm
f With Is Pir N In of Fol
Seattle 4A_98104 ka YSO %N-ft1� S C L Fr 5 1I! i I
Th N
St FS n 1 All Sid to
LN of SN /4 f � 1/4 IN N All St
to Sd C/L In to F-1 LESS County A
,I.SBASt1t.Lyt.B1d9..EpfIl._-. 4 9rt001' d 64 to of
%rdiESt�ea710of - -16,318 42 _
�4020Seat lest A son r320 SE 1!1 /y� So
or TRup ey[n
i 225500 S�_M ASt n91 LA1grM;�9r•Oy6
r _.._. __._..._..'�..__
Seattle. NA 98118 i t °
275 Ft N7l
nU1a Ni swway,t5�y 1i S(
-11 d t 111N p% Ln t oG/L TA/ lyEytoS-
} sy 019dL / t aW f�
.i1 MSn 14-i Ln_ls PSH N IN
60. A11enWch,.Nenn±n M. ... yD - Ip jALOg10g JRl09 090of°Qd .,4, 7
1018 S.N. lute St. aiafne14-1/�t5a.A face Ftsl0O
--- NN of q Or 1n N 8999.06-03 E P 99 ppt - - - - rt-
Seattle W 98166 pL TO N1Y Ln IF State Highway /S Th _•
- - -- pN1r Al 41 Ln o N Ln Sd SN 1/4
6A Are .'h'.�.. -- --�+-_
TN u6.71 tah sAgYLn np yI-
-_— M is KN."
61, m ilfoethi_Norman X,-,_ SSyy#014.8 Reto ��1g t81 iZoml Sd
- at DAF For ofSSSM�S51 4 of StE 1 40psw`
�1018 S.N. loth Street 00M4 i -i�i- ob T°il..NN�9- n0�sE� 75FFt
Settle tiA 98,66 l� t0 N�y n y SGtO H 91Wy -
_ IN rAAE,9 AAN1yy]LynA�o9 N In �Snd $}N 11/4
_ Q/LTh �l r as l[S}°For Yit Ip - ..
f 92no A, has gall Road L_E_S�,__
qF76.7 1,Y illq N In TM S
Sto 1s.F1A.,11%
67. iounur 'SEC 30.23-05, S 2S0 Ft Naas Rig N
P.C. ba 677 Ln of Por of SE 1H LY Nly of State _.__._.._..
'bhton W f105$ N1YIway f5 LESS Sete Ni ghray
__.
^y7f- �106nter, ya .., _ _ ,SCC 7,-2LOS, M 1/2 of NN 1/1 of NW IOi5j2 43
,P.O. lox 637 114 Of WE,1/4 UIC Pors Cleed to Stela
Renton WA 98055 Of Nhshinnton for NN9ways 6 Eac Por
11 Ely Of $tat_- X19na4y 45 .
CITY OF RENTON
Abrwt D.II f.r 944N1 INyr.aaw.t Ootnet N. 11'— :CmUnd by 016r Ne. 779E ...
L.utIH'AN 0141 Nd. r..,,ow I.. It.l.r••a••a•f FkSi !WNdt.1.eo"
Frua S.Y. 16tt1 St. to S.Y. alit St.
and plated Streets
- oescer+roH a eta tltA18 twat NEXT _
Hat1a 010WlW arell.r w rArr.r lllruaal
\ maw ••
.arnearaW Aaa/aal4Nr Ayo,.r
mww! CO. aatauer
64. vmrison, JP- lot 28 a 29 a I"AS Earl
1632 Maple A". S... to cards
Repwa we
--'"
i5. toek. Y.L. _ Late
.903 N 36tn Street _ imuft Be, an Mal 35.36 a S 112 of
We 98056
_._ Renton. .—
37, \lk 2 LEIS SyyG Xi gamey
_ K. NarM k Jerr�_L.___ tt
M37 SE 259tn i ton • 1 1 __.
`49Fr0 Y C11.3)�dk 9 • .=.875 ,
r _ �c8 17
p• oa Y ;� .___.-.. OeeOS1 zR Sct 4yTy 1.
___—. r 1 -.. h 00• 2 0F`+20.U5 it to Ba9f - __ r .-_. .....
jG t M Investments r
�3f,,_p_11k 98125 t
flMMar-thT.
WA
--_ 60• 610 3rr Aren Cow _ 9 Th'S of-���T L �7 r wd.180 27 at
yy SEC_75Ti�0[[ Ay tFr-V p3Cej{ys
R itNinRF1 o94N2Cp8.15 C T 52p
20B Central Bldg. ttPF 1�0 a 1 7 tM -9�l
51E iS,�;yyS5 TT .27/7 itpp0�n ft
,
Sett W-9810i, ��€ToOPobaIESSXPobr-1�AtU
Bur"r
118"Cl,.21 jV tS ':I U-33 toki#agl EArlin9tap_4dr9ap.. ._-- .. ..._ ..
1I*-VOL utML[SS29rl,YttYy#_�.__.
_ _�ol_1¢Q E+st -- -- Ln - li.,q� )1t.E_l4,at k5,
a "A We 98102
eyE,ns Ifa Sec 21-23$W,y11E. o 1(Ja
v a Pod LESS Orr& Fa$Di oN uMen .._._-
2p80$7 _ Add LESS �ra1 qpt iteN
4l T�i�e� red. ark nt, F _
_ _y Set.2iS1,.4i..N3E9 FE.af.F a3a.9
to ilA11 65
y laid Road
ey o . ar oc.
72. yy, ce t5ygqpp Sec 21• ..pa, Gl 13 . .. _._..._ _.— __.. ..
-- on W 98055
Valley Office 1 Inc, park Inc. .._ ..
_ 3650 FYYfieidRoad ...
_.._._.--4L'A"uu ON 441.1
.Ibm" 9. Wolay Lot 22. alk 21. Xillaant Cartmpton N..; m. - --
__ cull ft'rtain view err, n, Wrdtnt 01. LE': Sate M41104Y
Renton M 9E055
CITY OF RENTON
♦wreart MU 'w-t l tsru.....,Oatnat Xo. 14 ; craw" kr orateaera 8a,. 33996 ...._..
Aeutlea As Oraloure rrea4w for too IeNe.aawel of Ea'.7 VA:L°.r ROAD
irpn S.Y. 16tn St. to S.Y. alit St.
era Related Streets
NAAM OF OVmse Rtl_amil9k Or atA ktialt - neeMal sell
- ._—.---- natowr or grrR wreaUr
i IOATGAU CO, aM �. w aewaaw a w aNaeerwr arowr aatou+ir
ITeames A L
3113 Mountain ViewAre. X de Lt. Garns Xt Ipw j_
—... Mete W 90055_ —}}__ T-
75. ShtVWn LTD tot 2MZ6 /1 11 M11LrIts.Eart3r.} - _, _I
_ i202 5outn_Ire Stmt can Ger4m ♦ I
1khtm w moss _1 I
74. LTD kq 26-77 1 214 rat unmans Earl1q. 3�aw Al
202 South ]ro Street ton 64
Amtm W 98055
77. skint ro Pstrioa Ann tLotS 16 Tfiru 25, Gik 212, ni llnans h --k
�Pnyztcs Departwmt :Earlln t Goneen5 at. LE State
t. ..
mlwrsltY or Art tone milimay _
'Tucsm A2 85721
76. Sextm, Richard—J. .—_ Lo_to 199-- �6yNc- 24,Hi l leans Carl ins; la
1 0 me 88575 _ _ CaMM0 X 4D Et of E 135.05 it 39�. ._
Seattle 4A 98188 1& 40 LESS Y 60 Ft LESS State Hignaay a
r-;
_ 79. 'nclntyro, Patricia Ann Lots 34.35. DL 22, nillmns Earlinj;, _3,54 IL
toersig ofLen --- ton Gordon rl
---- f Arizona
Tunm A2 $6721
a —
._- an. t!Art RlnitA—fin_____ f 9SL...if'�.�,-4.Ih� yi1113p^]Ee_rtfny6_ __3.l _�--•
19.0. Boa SOB en GAMS AI M
Mntm sM 96055
61 Powers, Frank A John. Lots 36.39.gpk 92 Xi_llrns Earlln 1,654 96 _._._ ..__ _. _9.,f. __. _
P,O. Box 506 —to-
Garden�I, 9Bsw GO Ft ot_M-e0
Amtm we SW55—_ S 20 Ft oe E U5.05 Ft of]9 1 ESS —
_ —^—Se ";;;;—__..__ ._
State XIgMy
Vl611 Gift�16[Ie6 led p Ay i--i!..14tS.�DfY.21.616S.X111®etlS Ldrl lf.StOfL_ Iu.t7a1 _. _
[1.v616at1 ON 661P4- -Gardens 11
Valley Ottice 6 Ina.Pork Inc.
16 hf
Stlllis _ _ L.4ts 27-2]. 511 1, elllmans Carlini- 1.i.i11
1925 ton yarocr,s tl —
9ellorw W1 98009
I
CITY OF RENTON
A�r�M•r till far't•s•1 Du h• :13 .'Comm 1•orWame"a., 3396......_
amtlN'A.Orau••r. errn4Y rrt tN Igr...aw.,rl EAST VALLEY ROAD _
From S.W. 16th St. t0 S.Y. {ltt St.
and Related Streets
IWY OF 0"IM --- — Mt tov h a 11. ISr.rt •110YYt er a •
gtNfltlt ! Wilmot
d N011TWiE CO. a� M .eaiw.a w� Asaaa NT A WARM Aft
118__ ] ihru 28�•lt 2_ NLj19NL..� 67,264 1
.0. Boa 1925 Earlifl]]_.____._�
ilarw W 9BOD9 _.. __ --4 I
i
Kippi, pipeIn E+. Sat 30-23 5, __.�•( 1(/ of NN_11 2
319 Liad Ave. S.Y. at_Rt `•L Ft S a 20 Ft E Of Nw
Wton a SMS T W_r o_f_5�t< 5 AB-52-01 E 910.93
Ft Tao 7L h ` a: Meat it t/A to
11 Oil cerp. E Lo of s.. 12 Y $77.01
Ft Th N n. F- w 903.20 t Tap 20
- 1711 pM AVaaoe S.Y.
it E o7 . ' ,r 5d,Swod TN N 00-49•
the W 91131
'— 10,C SN.i: 'i to 11E6. �----
_. BE__�Itr�f.,a1,f,_1.Irfoo_ d.w- 2S•21-04• Pdr Af fil l.lJladat._ 1 —_
- j�Lim -- 1 TY _44 fah 40-lR-l4_N � �
L69B1� �3�Ft j N p1-1 •59 N TQ ft Fr NE,
Cot of Sd Ol Tr N-88.2448 Y 1027.60• �--
-� ft N aI-01.19 F .10 Ft_TN S BB-2a
48 E 1027f/8 T� S 00-49-10 w
30.18 Ft to K9.
roar. 4.1' Lt wp LL— y81 65 32 2 Di. ?or of 61 9 6 Mkidu. ,.-_31.648 --�—
.o. 8w 268550 ff6 8p9 4 00-09-10 Y 1&3.01.,_ -�..—
__ f{S_N 87-l2-50 w,9041 it it Nf tor.—
Sd GI Th S 00-49-19 w 524.14 Ft 7h
BB-24-48 w 1027.48 Ft ih N 01-01_
19 E S40.31 Ft Tip N 87.12-59 w Fr
FOB TN I 67 12 59 E 1026.07 h To
Wr1�8ton NoriOF L*.lOt. At; 95-23-04. 1w 114 9f SE la--F r6latiar Park Co.
'20B central 6ldd. _____�.
MU 3rd Arenwe r
$Vitt It WA 9610E
__ _—___►.O. Ma 64_ _- ..jM-1/4 Ly E of M P.B(Y LESS S S45.6
Ae,tda W MOSS ft ae Neaz A19 E Ln Tor SN 1/4 of NE
1/4 LESS S 545,6 Ft as Neat Alo w Ln
LESS N 10 its.
CITY OF RENTON
aa....w.t l.,,fair'Kral I.rrn..ot Du,ri S.. 31/ Cra.Nd by Or"a.W N._ 33g6
l.ull.d'A.O,w..r.H•.,dW fro,it.Lrr..r.ut.f ikS' VALL0 RCNO.
from S.M. 16th St. to S.W. 11st St
and Related Streets
��� plstaVlpn q aW fai.R - - Mtn
iN.E Of OWNER .— --. — — A66864� NarNt I Wilnlei
110
A MORTGAGE CO. a'r'� W� �, n ft ft i AMNNt 9 Arowr
WW
.AO. Bruacres Inc. - qfyl�
Phnton MR98055 DC N6 TN 1 1 E Ll_2Zo_265�,3B.i __ k
Th Ml T N ►-�_In Gl 11
at Pt 2B9. 2 ; a6 Phas Al Sd R M
Fr_S In O< M To Sd S Ln TN t
91. Washington_)ockoy Club Por !lode he 046 Brj_el8.9_f _60,18 9/ _
P.O. Boa 60 R of NE C of BE h S 310 Ft Th M_
Photon W 9B06S 485.1 Ft S e10 Ft N of S L
of tK Th to Ln N P RY R/M TAN t---r--
-- A19 Sd R/M to N Ln of OC Th E to BE" --'1�' 7
{ E 92/ Ft Ly Nly of Fw Lake Pipe L
"R/Y LESS N E/0 Ft 6 BEG at NO of S t,
Ln of DC { E Ln of GI 10 Sec 25-23 _
—r Mtn w to E Ln of NP R(M Th N A19 R/M
—� to S Ln of Bu Lake Pipe Ln Th Ely {
,Katy A1g SO Ln tO Pt N of Beg Tn S
to Bag TGw,G1 11 A Por 61 B of Sec
„2/-23-0/ ly E 01 HP R/M { S of S A 1
---" -'"—��—�- -- 151rd St ALSO MM 1111 of Y 1/1 lY S'r_--
-' of S 153ra St Formerly Bond 110 LESS.
'1 k or ltMl Tai-$ lET7 oF-CTS 4 in Seems -
- --"-- ;24-23-01 t the'Ren'ry A IWder.K #
in Sit 2/ { 25.23-i1 _
Cook Halter 1 Nillrt�s_.._.._;l— 1
903 N 36th Strait Earl in to n 1 1
Photon yA 98055 All 36-39 (SS. Mi __ ..---- --
T._
LID 314
Parcel a Preliminary Final Revised
Assessment Assessment Final Asseessment
1 13.456.95 10,276.11 10,938.09
2 35,510.03 22,5127.05 24,214.05
3 28,806.67 18,105,10 19,304.66
4 29,799.75 16,166.82 17,193.05
5 19,046.57 12,184.65 13,174.01
6 81801 .50 5,633.38 6,091.72
7 748,721.00 886,523.34 928.843.90
8 37,299.69 34,588.07 41,369.73
9 6,954.46 4,743.67 5.631.59
10 24,355.85 22,495.15 18,591.15
11 8b,229.99 114,916.41 229,496.28
12 103,700.46 135,066.16 267,386.04
13 104,664.21 118,398.13 127,887.89
14 96,895..a 106,515.84 124,726.62
15 132.452.35 134,333.52 164,964,18
16 46,145.14 43,544.42 17,547.60
17 55,489.70 57,210.54 22,414.58
Preliminary• Final Revised Final
Parcel t Assessment Assessment Assessment
18
19 i $61,830.99 630,357.23 653,352.99
20 222.297.33 240,814.25 254.009.26
21 13%..320.39 154,506.88 152.504.16
22 138,802.2E 158,523.99 156,489.17
23 -- _— 128,640.58 119,600.94 152,947.81
24 84,634.20 78.325.69 102,532.78
25 27,198.31 25,170,83 32.950.04
26 ----- 112.792.50 104.384.90 136,645.76
27 38,582.37 98.441.27 64,432.61
28 — _--— 4,950.20 12.630.?0 8,266.83
29 4,360.38 11,125.33 7,281.84
30 18,089.83 97,194.57 63,610.07
31 89.444.35 106,324.42 102.640.09
32 J_---- 86,718.33 99,369.12 90,087.65
33 84.510.97 96,8° .71 95,073.53
34 81,835.56 86,835.92 108,517.17
35 183,011 .36 213.559.46 211,378.27
Preliminary Final Revised Final
Parcel A Assessment Assessment. Assessment
36 83,662.00 97.627.18 96,180.74
37 48,628.39 56,745.80 69,008,85
38 1,287.64 3,285.33 2.150.34
39 1,400.80 3,574.08 2,339.34
40 2,992.42 7,635.03 4,997.34
41 15.075.67 38,464.94 25,176.40
42 324,799.57 372.182.43 367,382.73
43 179,503.81 457,996.26 368,058,25
44
45
46 216,018.76 87,424.00 101 ,714.04
47 36,423.49 12,154.22 14,852,93
48 44,940.95 15.552.83 18,112.06
49 35,634.60 14,368.67 15.229.08
50 13,087.45 3,167.82 4,146.86
51 37,127.51 13,678.76 14,638.86
52 118,292.71 44.600.89 46,249,14
53 68,488.52 27,899.90 26,003.20
Preliminary Final Revised Final
Parcel 1 Assessment Assessment Assessment
54 13,241.41 3,512.73 4,598.43
55 81 ,950.59 31 ,526.5) 31,825.72
56 113,814.14 43,286.23 44,367.71
57 45,172.04 16,866.61 17,730.39
58 96,625.10 35,015.74 38.325.03
59 38,456.86 12,825.12 15,479.80
60 36,527 00 12,362.59 14,82G.87
61 39,641.04 13,354.36 16.318.42
62 40,167.58 12,426.46 16,206.94
63 30,994.35 8,046.20 10,532.93
64 6,503.14 6,682.93 7,605.39
65 4.287.10 3,911.99 4,857.26
66 8.134.98 8.601.36 9,590.36
67 280,939.51 304,341.92 322,875.75
68 179,492.77 201 ,788,21 204,180.27
69
70
71
Preliminary Final Revised Final
Parcel 0 Assessment Assessment Assessment
72
73 1,156.49 983.58 643.78
74 1,536.47 1,306.75 855.31
75 3.139.05 2,669.72 2,980.36
76 3,139.05 2,669.72 2,980.36
77 7,517.19 6,393.26 6,2 1.73
78 1 ,672.77 1 ,422.68 931.18
79 3,221 .65 2,739.97 3,586.77
80 3,221.65 2,739.97 3.138.43
81 2,980.02 2,534.47 1 ,658.88
82 39,248.05 80,551.95 60,000.79
83 5,976.61 12,272.47 13,b. ,0
84 43,999.11 90,303.04 67,264.10
85 15,147.96 38,649.36 25,297.11
86 6,362.76 16,234.31 10,625.82
87 20,148.75 51,408.66 33,648.43
88 5,885.7�. 15.017.13 9,829.14
89 101 ,605.94 259,243.16 197,617.48
Preliminary Final Revised =inal
Parcel# Assessment Assessment Assessment
90 91,445.34 233,318.85 179,614.63
91 33,866.65 86,414.39 60,lel.94
92 1,610.82 4,109.95 982.91
OF RFM
z PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
RICHARD C HOUGHTON • DIRECTOR
1 "L MUNICIPAL BUILDING 2M MILL AVE SO. RENTON.WASH.9@056
1 °f Jc^a 4, 1984 206 235 2563
EP
IrED SE PtEV,0
BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH
'..AYOR
HONORABLE BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR AND
MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
SUBJECT: L.I.D. N714, EAST VALLEY HIGHWAY, et al
Dear Mayor and Members of tM: City Council :
As of 5:00 p.m, this date, we have 9 written protests to the revised
assessments on L.I.D. M314. The protests make up 6.8 fi of the final
assessment roll.
Very truly yours,
Richard C. Houghton lJf
Public Works Director
ckd
L. I .�• No. 314 Mt FSTONF%
Initial Resolution No. 2283
7/ 2/79
Seconr Resolution 2299
First Public Hearing 9/24/79
0/15/79
Second Public Nearing
Ordinance No. 3396 /5/79
/2t/80
Amount Of Preliminary Assessment Roll
f6,2}6,338.5G
Start of Construction
7/ 6/82
Completion of Construction
2/ 7/84
Acceptance of Protect
2/27/84
Final Public Hearing
4/ 9/84
Amount of Final Assessment 4/19/84
f 6,969, 113.60
Amount of ROvIsed Final Assessment 6/4/84
f",056,579.90
FINA ORTS
Consultant Fees
f 808,613.00
Inspection, Engineering, Test Labs d Misc.
Finance Costs E ?62,520. 10
f 16,51; 00
Interim Financing
$ 868.524.57
Bono Discount and Registration
S 190,889.40
City Clerk
f 1 ,391 .20
Utility Division
S Right of Nay 3,876.59
f 510.609.66
Aitorney's Fees
f CONSTRUCTION COST 11 ,495.30
TOTAL COST TO L. I .D. 54,282. 150.08
$7.056,579.90
r • S i
� w • II _
�I
l � � M ,II • I � n
Z � 1 I •
I � i
` ......�.�.
I r • M I n a I
1 i _�T .• �' �.. w. r.• I n. r. r
1 • n ni
�_ �-. a w• r
• .�__ ................IIi .
i u
I•i I II►.r rr r•
I I
1
I
1 ..
I t
cm os KAtrat LL).314
E YALL[T FA" A LW. 31.0 GT.
.,,.. I W..1 i
t