The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutWWP2701999(52)1 * 71 BEGINNING OF FILE FILE TITLE 'Pro a L711 O 1* 31 'A E. Q a11ey Rw . Cjorr -pw,a-,Ck. #5 OF Rt•� d a- PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT RICHARD C HOWHTON • DIRECTOR Q' MUNICIPAL GUILOINO MO MILL AVE.SO. AEMTON.WAfH.aaafa P° 2% 23b 2569 'eo sevx t� 9ARBARA Y. SHINPOC- MArpa January 19, 1984 Cascade Septic Service Inc. P.O. Box 44010 Tacoma, MA 98444 Attention: Mr. Mark Perry Re: LID 314, East Valley Highway Punch List Dear Mark: Enclosed please find the Punch List for the above referenced project. Please review and advise if you have completed or question any items on the list. Once we have come to terms with the list, we can set a value and responsibility on the items remaining. Your immediate response will be appreciated. Very truly yours, Donald h. Monaghan, P.E. Design Engineer :jft Enclosure LID 114 PUNCH LIST ROAD 6 STORM Install Monuments 15 ea. @ $125.00 ea. SI,8`5.00 Replace Curb 6 Gutter - 47 L.F. PS4.20 I .F. 134.40 S.M. 27th STA 29+66 2 L.F, E.V. Rd. STA 67+70 2 L.F. 55+00 2 L.F. 61+00 2 L.F. S, of P-9 Channel 24 L.F. S.M. 190, 4 Lind Ave. S.M. southeast corner 15 L.F. Pour C.M. So S.Y. 0$9.50 S.Y. 47S.00 Dave 6 Swedes (Segal*%) E.V. Rd. STA 65+80 Remove ealsting sidewalk at S.M. 27th St. 1,500.00 Curb for Driveways at S.M. 27th - 108 L.F, H54.20 L.F. 453.60 Install Driveways 10" thick at S.M. 27th St.- 60 S.Y. a $15.40 S.Y. 924.00 Install Ortveway for Mobil Oil 's Emergency Access 6 S.Y. *315:40 S.Y.- 123.20 - CD's to be Grouted: V. Rd. STA 82+50 71.30 66+10 Lt Pipes 65+40 Pipe sell 56+50 28+00 Lt S. Side of Atb-.at Eael_Val.ley Road Inspect and Repair Type II CD's Lumo Sum 4,000.00 E.V. Rd, STA 25+67 28+00 29+26 (2) 41+18 53+52 56+50 60+32 62+50 65+35 96" AN's on 60" pipe to 0e-eleane6 i aw{d10 •.Way qww -- ---. t,IrD0.00 Adjust Sanitary 14H at East E.V. Rd. STA 67+08 Lt. under walk 1,000.00 39+90 (27th) 42" storm Iinea are low .First C.R. S• of "A-ttanomy" on Lt. s+de. Line needs to be cloanad. LID 314 PUNCH LIST ROAD 6 STORM - Pape 2 ` Redo N.H. at E. V. Rd. STA 56432 Sewer M.X. 1,000.00 35+00 • 35+07 (27th) N. 12" Storm has bad joint. S. 12" has bad joint also. Grade break in 12" line. 1 ,000.00 E.V. Rd. Storm M.H. needs ladder and pl,,e needs muddinq on bottom. Relay Storm Line C.V. Rd. STA 75+20 between Type I CO's 300.00 73+30 Re 1 ey IV - I,000.00 71+30 Grade break In crossing 1,500.00 36+18 itt J160) Locate end of 6" C.T, pipe caning Into Type I tB " t00.00 WATER Paint Guard Posts 14 Ea. M $15.00 ea. 210.00 Paint Valve Markers 35 ea. P S15.00 ea. 525.00 Paint Hydrants 35 ea. P $15.00 ea. 525.00 Readjust Valve Boxes 6 ea. lv $75.00 ea. 450.00 E.V, Rd. STA 21+28 31+19 33+84 36+08 37+19 42+72 Readjust H2O Vault E.V. Rd. STA 29+28 or 29+98 S.W. 34th 6 Cast Valley Road Adjust Valve Boxes 2 ea. tt $75,00 ea. �SOy00 , E.Y. Rd. STA 39+27 Lt. S.M. corner 16th St. 6 Lind Locate Valve Boxes E.V. Rd. STA 32+17 - —+0,-^r»-- 25+30 _._. Lid an Valve 9oxes to be replaced E.Y. Rd. STA 'Vonarhan's" 29+55 31+19 36+08 39442 Rt. 46+00 fit, Maple 6 16th Rt. LID 314 PUNCH LIST WATER - Pape 3 ` Valve Extension E.V. Rd, STA 29+66 • 1' Hydrant 9105 "Jonathan's" I' 40+35 Pit. 2' 89rg0 - H 0 Vauit to be cleaned. 48.65 Lt.2Need extension o,, 2" B.O. 64f15 At. - Need lid for valve box - Clean out Ground Gate for Hydrant Valve for 2" 6.0 at end of Taylor needs to be cleaned out. Valve Box at south driveway for "A-Economy" needs fide, also fill in around manhole. Locate-amf edjust avatar-M"ir"ttt' front aP Jonothan�.s..11ost?. PAVING Seal Cold Joints L.S. S51000.00 Patch around Meter Box - Dave and Swede's North driveway for "Rainier Disposal" on Maple to be paved. Asphak-tie-in to-Ee heated, sealed antYsafrded. - - Seal crack in front of Marlino's, Pave behind Mobil Oil - Emergency Access Road. ;s STREET LIGHTING d TRAFFIC CONTROL , a _ -0HN 4+fir gall I r. Arta Naal ena - TVPa 11 46 r Thermoplastic Arrows 6 as, 0$6.3,00 378,00 S,W, 16th d Lind S.W. 27lh s Lind Thermoplastic Letters 4 ea. i+S 31.50 126.00 S.W. 16th d Lind Ave. S. leg LID 314 PUNCH LIST GENEFAL CLEA',JP • ►W A .. Aemove cone rek block•"Kross from "NlIVII True�iisv Finish llushlng E■ Son. One on East Valley Road Z Govera for wlves, 11N covers, otc. tc be claanetl of aspMlt. Clean Di,ch at Auntln Company S 400.00 Place riurap at Springbrook Including 24" pipe end.. Install telemetry as-W t Strtloo, - - k 49tl'•�" - Provide aa Itw-4gaer fur Lift Station and NOSe emf"l7ftltkel lei barft;t S JSib:aO-+w`+'+*� se:vice. Repair Sanitary Sewer at S.M. 27th St. t Springbrook. Repair Sanitary Sewer on East Valley Road Cases& y:, r septic service,ine. November 29, 1983 Don Monaghan City nt Renton -unicipal boildinq 200 Mill Avenue So th Renton, WA 90W RFt LID 314 near Dont In response to your letter dated November 14. 1963 and in summary of out meaning yesterday in your office, we agrus with the followinq proposal for completion of the project. Martin and 1 m#t November 1S, 1903 and established a final Punch List with approximately 56 items that pertain to the road, watar and sanitary. Due to the unseasonably high amount of rain, we have been unable to compinte the items that ate weather affected. 'rhos# items have been determined to benefit both the City of Renton and Cascae Septic Service, Inc. if they are, done at a later time, 1: Monuments - 15iea 0125,00.'ea 5 1,NT5.00 2: i.vard Posts - 14/ea 815.00/ea 410.00 I. Valve Markera 1+21 35/e4 015.00.`e0 525.00 4. Hydrants - 11-24 IS/ea $15.00 525.00 5.` Raise Valve Noxes - 7/oa 05.00 525.00 6. curb - 30 L.F. 04.40/lf 126.00 7. seali.nq Cold aoint'n - Lump Sum 5,000.00 8. (aeon D tch At Austins - Lump Sum 400.00 9. Adjust Valve at 16th and Lind 75.00 13. 96" M.N. .leaned t Mudded - Lump Sum 1,600.00 11, Install. Driveways at 27th St. 60J4y 115,40lsy 924.00 W. Curb for Driveways at 27th St. 106.11f 44.20/lf 453.60 1). Remove existinq sidewalk at 27th 4,S00.00 14. Saw cut exrstinq at 27th 17S.So IS. Sidewalk - 75 L.F. " 50%ay 09,",'ny 47S.00 ,rib. Redo M.N, cover 60+)5 - Lump Sum 1,000.00 17. adjust M.N. at 67+04 75.0E lit. 27th St. Station 35+07 Repair 12" Pipe 1,000.00 19. Feet. Valley Station T5+20 hetween type 1 and Type 2 Repair 12" pipe 3u0.00 20. Fast Valley 7)+30 repair 10" 30' north of M.N. 1.,0D0.00 0 2L Locate 6' C.I. stub Type I - 16th StatiJn 16+10 100.00 2i. Remove asphalt from ring and covers 1.000.00 23. Repair 1 Y crossing Cast Valley Station 71+30 i.500.01 2{. Repair Type 2 C.B.'s East V311ey Stations, 15+67, 26+UU. 29+26, 61+18, 53+52, 56+50, 60+32, 62+50, 65+35 - Lump sum 4,000.00 2S. Install telemetry at Lift Station 500.00 26. Provide new cover for lift station 500.00 $26,166.10 It is our understanding that the only items to be inspected next spring would be the items on this list and at the end of one year there wou.d be the normal maintenance inspection. No further cleaning ur numpinq of the storm linen, of other work installed by Cascade Septic Service, Inc. than those listed on this list and fail.uree of workmanship and materials. We are aware of the elect.ricsl punch list a" it is out understanding that everything but the work at the lift station is done. Me are In agreement with the amount not for the remaining of the work. At the time that our retention is released we will provide a check to the City equal to this amount& plus Sot that will he reimbursed to us on the completion of the project. If you are in agreement with this eroposal , please sign one of the copies and return to Us. We request final inspection Oecemtw:r li, 1963 .,t 1000 A.M.. If you have any futther questions, please crntact me. Yours tru , t�K 6 y Vice President MF t kil J aJrsf Mo Isir fe s . « J MJ 2 I"' ..'",t . .-/► // lw� r rt{'r /A.% .I r^wj v 1 L p '(, w. A I /1 H 4• .Nf' liu� ♦I li +�—� 1 it n 1 V 311gIH7S ry w-. rp I, .µ, f% r,w P"A& mYW ., +uOMAjed p 6u 1 j»u l eu3 IVDd !1 A11Y0 SUO M441 :. r✓!•.f.I n 11 4404 r t T „''„ � S I, •�•1!!!m + r m I..�� S NCI ..4 J N az .: aft..- Fr.. b.A fdJ as SvT�rt/ S++p. � �+I6 dar �teiel S{► i'7 r.7p7 . � , S.Aid T L / taus a: 41 jso ,. G. ,..rya F y 1�'. /w.7 it C?' 4.*ul•W f ,.... uA f�e R4 . ,'eJ�1r I"[d{I. i a � ; �•�.4� /t YJ. ' ' b .... wC'. ..1.. f.. )or / • W iPa.� .n.t,i .��.).�-�i .. Y� !Jw _ Y. £ 11' ..:I IR,S, �ww�►T..._ r.�^. �. .�w�..�w✓ Ir. Ar r r,.(� 14L�J Ir i '1` 7:f .• -h'�4. I«tw(r.� St.%ryl r s-�I.✓. K.. .... ,. . ! • • ;fir `•.{1�/. r..� r"Is,rM.. SSia. ¢ �ffr. f.: ! ... $SAW iv #141 S/o. 1 , r 3er�9 JJ f Y 1f : 7 + ry • �� w• Ci�s.....r .r� /��til� it... P l'e:{. J .. 1 t ��,fr a i- � ✓9,r L r" • • November 10, 1963 PARTIAL PUNCH LIST FOR LID 314 I. Beauty bark at Jonathan's Warehouse and also remove trot-srump. .2. Pick up loose rock in front of "Red b White". 3. Place rlprap around pipe at trash rack at "Milt's Trucking". 4, Clean up pea rock at "Lumber Market". 5. Place crushed rock behind C.M. south of "Lumber Market". b. Grate for Type I L.B. (Behind C.M.) north of "Lumber Marke. '. 7. 2 ft. strip of C.W. missing at STA 55f00. 8. Need cap for steamer port on hyd. at STA 56+50+ RT. 9, Trash Rack at STA 60+32 needs pick holes, etc. grouted up. 10. 61+00 RT. 2' section of C&G needs to be replaced - badly cracked. II. C.N. - Lt. at 65+80 broken - replace. 12. 36+18 RT. IS.W. 'oth) 6" C.I . coming into C.B. - Loc. end of 6" C.I . Martin Lundy Construction Inspector :jft 0 �r ..S6. Approximately { Type 2's In the center of 16th need to be looked at. This Punch List replaces the previous one issued. It is everything Martin knows about. d -9-7 1—LJeM tax. ,� rJ 4 �J\� JJ S B -i7 _ 41a At C�.ae.ueC_ VO Z, TM �. \�. • j Ih' ..f4 �' y \ter. 1�..� V(. l Ycc. 1� �. a iU -. EAST VALLEY ROAD I. Protector post 2" B.O. at and of Taylor Ave. S.W. 2. 67 + 57 LT. - Lid for valve box. 3• 39 + 63 RT. - M 2 0 meter box missing. S.M. 27th Street 4. 39+90 LT. 6 AT. - 12" storm have 2" - 3" low areas in runs. 5 35+07 AT, - First two pipe laid out of C.B. at a flat grade, pipe then dives down at a very steep angle Into Type 11. Have reason to believe that because of angle there is a bad joint in line. 35+07 - LT. - First Joint out of Type It on 12" - joint separation. EAST VALLEY RW The following valve bans need repairs: 21+28 - Valve box low/or asphalt around it. 31+19 - Valve box low/or asphalt around it. 33+84 - Valve box low/or asphalt around it.- 36+08 - Valve box low/or asphalt around it. 37+19 - Valve box low/or asphalt around it. 62+72 - Valve box low/or asphalt around it. 29+96 - N20 Vault. vovember 1, 1983 ?UNCH LIST .ID 314 1. All hydrants have to be painted, including the valve markers. 2. Type is on East Valley between 41st and 34th need sume creaming and general cleanup before final inspection. 3. The piles along side Type 2's on East Valley need to be cleaned up. 4. The 3 catch basins in Craig-Taylor's parking lot need to be creamed and cleaned also. 5. The water vaults need the 1" passes. 6. Need a ticket for hydro-seeding 7. On the corner of 27th and East Valley there is some pipe that needs to be picked. 8. There is a piece of sidewalk just south of the 0-9 channel that needs to be replaced, approximately 24 L.F. 9. Pierce of curb and gutter on the eastside of East Valley across from the south entrance of A-Econo and fill in the hole around the existing hydrant on the westaide of East Valley at the south entrance of A-Econo patching around the utilities. the cold joinLz between the streets need to be sealed and sanded. 11. Sanitary MH at 16th and Taylor needs the outline grouted. 12. The piece of sidewalk in front of Dave and Swedes that needs to be repoured. Segale broke it. 13. There are pieces of curb that were replaced on East valley on 16th between Taylor and Maple that need some AR-4000 on it. 14. Some crushed rock needs to be put between the 2 driveways of Seattle Lumber . The crushe•i cock is sitting across the street. 15. Need to clean the ditch in front of Austins on the north side. 16. Sanitary on 19th needs to be flushed. 17. Adjust hydrant valve on the westside of the insection of 16th and Lind. 18. There is a sneet buried on 16th and Lind. 19. The lift station is ready for the fire up. Set up a meeting between Gary Morrison and Don Monaghan and hydronics for the start up. 20. Blade off the area around the lift station. Pick up the debris and place a little crushed rock around the hatch opening itself. 21. The 8" sanitary on 19th needs to be flushed. Mid-Mountain has made a mess and dug along the curb on 19th and chipped the curb in places. Tf s is mud all out in the street. 22. Clean up the yard area of the excess pipe etc. 23. Clean up the dirt piles around the blow-offs on 27th west of Lu,d. 24. The 12" existing sanitary line on 27th west of Lind needs to be flushed. 25. Backfill around blow-offs and light standards west of 27th. 26. Replace curb at valve on northaide of 27th west of Lines. 27. The south entrance to rDbil Oil, at the driveway approach needs asphalt and a guard post at the hydrant. 28. Replace the rip-rap on Springbrook .29. Replace quarry spauls at the and of the 240 discharge. 30. 27th seat of Lind needs to be smoothed up with a CAT. It. Backfill trash rack at the and of 27th vest. Pick up Pipe at the and of 27th. 32. 144" and 96" MB's installed by Coluccio need to be cleaned and general mudding. 33 The topmost MB on East Valley 34. Type 1 on the eastside of East Valley at 77+00 east needs to have the pipe broken off and mudded. 3S. Type 2 between the P-9 and 19th need to be pumped down so we can see the mudding on the bottom and general cleanup. 36. The north part of the intersection of 19th and East Valley on the 96" MN the casting has to be shoved back over top of the opening. 37. Type 1's on East Valley at 82+50 both need to be cleaned. 36. The Type 2 that was added on East Valley just north of 8'+50 needs to have a hanging ladder and the sump cleaned out. Mudding looks good. Pipe needs to be mudded on the bottom. 39. Water vault at 89+5u needs to be cleaned on the inside 40. Type 2 at 89+86 needs to be cleaned out and pumped down. R1/AYvlftwa b vgmM• wrYw i�F�w Mn�iY�� Uu for wy MI/MY 4�II�Mw•1 m, , . Wino-, U,MeM w�wwrrA�Mww -• Mwl w�r+a�41Nt UM iF r�Mlrr.r�iiY�ry�l�iy�ilw 2 5 319 na rnencstl - �~- nlonR•, a�.c..Ho rcoo�ewa iloo+cM:ow wl MOO mal ch[CK.�Iu wwiri n'm Nm 1Yn �" NIOY Wot N0.OF NECATMS FILM SIEE OR SLIOES NO.OF PRINTS FROM EACH SLIDE 04 NEe. NO.OF ROLLS ENLRRCEMENT SIff NO.OF MIM , 4303 ��'I�I FROMM—R777 ECK REflN��[pppflFFP�ppp -------- DUPLICRTE COLOR SUM pF RFC OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY• RENTON.WASHINGTON L' \I T j nOSt pI+�M.IN •00 f MtrRfr • rt.rd wn•5•d +N)f !N MN F LAWRENCE I WARREN. c•.or•wy. DANIEL KEL LOGG, nfArw o•••rra•,.. • DAVID M DEAN •1111.1 per arrpw• P �rEe ,fK,pl- MARK E aAReLlI, •tu+`•wr c•rr•rrtra,!• Sf P ZANETTA L FONTES. bU+N+.r h`•-I'm MARTHA A FRENCH ur••`a I August 29, 1984 ✓TO: DON MONAGHAN, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT FROM: LAWRENCE J. WARREN, CITY ATTORNEY RE: SEGREGATION OF ASSESSMENTS ON PARCEL 19, LID 302 By Memorandum dated April 27. 1983 you wrote to the Finance Director indicating that the sum of $7,582.61 should be removed from the assessments of the REMP parcel, Parcel 19 of LID 302. Our records indicate that the amount that should have been deducted was $8,400.00. Can you explain to me the difference in the figures, or alternatively, the source of your figures. For your information, copy of your April 27. 1983 Memorandum iw-vttached hereto. C7 1 Lawrence .1. iron LJW:ds Attach. Jew ems-- . 35'4W y,,R../+•+- ..7 `"'7f a ...y+,•,,�,,,�.tiV I+c. Crt'�a^1• �c ar.1" - � I . A. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 1 ♦ 2 DESIGN/UTILITY EBg'i:NEERiNG • -" .- MFIMd/AL VAL006 MALL Atq.= NNITON.WASH NOBS Pe rro 31"t-0 BAR9ARA Y. SHINPOCH April 27. 1983 MAVOR MEMORANDUM TO: Mike Mulcahy. Finance Director FROM: Don Monaghan. Design Engineer SUBJECT: 5earegation Parcel 19 of L.I.D. 0302 In C.mJunetion with the right-of-way acquisition by the City for L.1.Ds A14, please make a sepregntion of Parcel 19 of L.I.D. 0302 as follows: OLD ENTRY AMOUNT DUE Parcel 19 - BEMP ASSOCiatea. S16E,002.80 NEW REVISED nARCFI.S Parcel 19-A BEMP Associates 160.420.19 NEW LEGAL: The East 160 feet of the N 1/2 of the S.W. 1/4 of the S.W. 1/4 of Bec. 19, Twn 23 N.. Ra. S E. Less portion for road upt AFp 8206090161. Parcel 14-8 City a' Ran to" 200 Mill Ave. $ 7,582.61 NEW LEGAL: Portion of N 1/2 of S.W. 114 of Sec. 11. Twn 21 N. Rg 5 E., mire particularly described in deed recorded under AFg 8206090161. The new assessment at Parcel 19-B will be paid by L.I.D. 0314 as part of the right-of-♦ .y acquisition. Please advise what the interest charges would be Ito* the date the bonds were issued until the nent1wamption date and what that data Right be. AG:ckd J A� _ ,<, r CITY OF RENTON Aatmomilneat Roll for "local Inprivenent District No. 02._. v CrMId by Oetlaana N41'.._I138,,,,,,,.., FAUUW"Am Ordlosnee providing for .:.. ._. ,..: of 1 IND AVE,SW, SW 43at St. i SW 14th St. SW 34th St. DucatKlul or Yat «Ran [seer y aowu am am or ar[Ira inert rr +sueanrr r"MOn fer111e5r ♦ leer, Co. eve. for au, aoolna va rYT uwem as orison mam aawwn 1 M' 6 20.12 51 fr r (Service Pallet Co.) lad Pk Renton p 1100 Aodecor Park W. xr -t ,•� A Bull N l 3908. i I I I III Dora-thy L. Castro Ind PkP * _ (Sucerior Fast Frelzr I� 1 P.O. Box C-34200 AM 4 missions Pn ne � 1040 Andover Par: W, Ind Pk Renton M J. _ 1�a Tukwila WA 98188 Glacier Pack Co. Burl N 0 Illims 50962 »+41 •+ " -5 ' Ai,; Central Bldg. Ind Fk Renton r 910 3rd Ave. Seattle, WA 9e1'w C. R Burl N Orillia 81 4/1'ttntrol Bldc• Ind Pk Renton 910 3rd Ave Seattle, WA 4SID4 Stuart D. Kno n?roth.- L. Caxtro ':rl > rim ',Superior Past Freight) lni Pk Renton el - ro Sox t.-14200 0 P tal An Seattle WA 48134 GL1tUt �'ari. i'arc.' - ' 2 Burl S art ill is CITY OF REN rON 303 3138 Aeaeaam•M A^51 for "local Impro+event Ih.,nrl No. � Cltaprd 67 Ordinance No.. ._.. Entitled 'An Ordiunce prodding for the Improvement of LLND.AV6..8„Y,, SR 34th St._..,, oteralerla OF aw. Urart ear or aorwu am MAR-or coin or aeoeen e•nmer lerwst Ma am. Co.. eeetrlM On rtAT "allow N rOw•,rC A""r tlea]nr n'S. lM aLL. Glacier P rk Co. 1 2 Burl N 1 a 4956 .70 Ind Pk Ratttbe pl re. 77 477 Central Bld — 810 3rd Ave Seattle, WA 98104 S._W. 411t ST. Burl N 0rlllia 980)9 77 Mrrcur Marine 1939 Pioneer Fond du Lac, Wie.54935 K.C. Fankenberry tT plena. 4 Admin.) laclor Park Co. 4 2 Bur N on la '7897 4 437 Can tral DIQ Ind Pk Renton 010 3rd Ave Seattle, WA 98104 7 6' 91 2021 152nd Ave. NL Center/Renton T` Redaand, WA 98052 r t T 1021 152ad Ave. NE I Canter/Renton �:'400114 WA 98052 v Fal soli Bus lnexx :i�N Nn 61 __ -,__ 2021 152nd Ave. NE H licenter/Renton i CITY OF RENTON Atnewment Roll for "Local Impro,ement lhnlrlet Nw...302....," cnatw by oetgusimps Hw.�lt.4 . •titlid'An Ordleanre providing for the ImproveteeNef. },1oA,Ave. $Wt 9V.�l�t SC i 8R NCA gt CIND AVE. SW. otltatrtioll at pat gtlde a40 OF WAO erM or MtIr 4 11M. Co. 4iolrtON A FIAT sttrr a ,..awn r� tarsals?Ja. lAr aaNeaear M taullteC Mir MELt TRO Iodwtrial Iot. 'rh W t 160 fear of 15626J.81 PO box 21545 P R; Vacat oc -ILA ALAdi-AL""is.— Ad 11een'a Earllagt ^D 3 _ r E rh. 13299;.03 .' PO Box 21545 ° Taw va at streeta adj. 41 to It ton Gotdena Addn r Th 1: t 160 ft. of the ,b Real Eata[c Co. So t t. o H00 SW lbth va at streets ad1. Renton WA 98055 a °R " Citv of ayntQn T i W t Jj 200 Mill Ave. Fo R t.ota 1 thru ]2 Renton, WA 9SOS5 Hi Im-in TR n Esrlingt an n. N ward So.IJ Th —Wei t 120 feet of th 1143931 .6 "0 &+x 3925 Po � Hillmans Esrl ing 8e",vue. WA 99009 B1 ck i.ardens No. I ASSOC fat es Ih !: t h0 ce ( 16800 t o lelterrs 0K, Corp to v. Tl 11, N 1 2 of 00 et Drive 19 23 L 7 Ron tto 16g00 ,B' a c •iter "'" - CITY OF RENTON Assessment Anil for 't"al Impro+'emenl District No. It'2 Cnated by Ordinance No. 31:)A Entitled 'An Ordinance providing for the Improvement of Land A,+,. S'„, W. 41st St. 4 S.W. 34t Prrtntrflo, a UAL ISTaTI 4 M or tMM yam w aoen+L apT N . "Ail" lmr or +Ssgsa tefT licturfT a OaT' � et't. LM Ina_ A ITIM PI RAT uafaaaat 4 ap4,lam AND MT Mm111R t ,lohn We .,r + ,. lh W t 1P0 feet of th 0310 .IR Y Ronald Allison +w•�•• O. I o N� v Richard Dlven Les IN 70 ft. and less Richard Iversen c7o A425 tat Ave. S. Syattle WA 9KOB 1. 1 0Iv, fc Pi elfne Ca LCM 94. Pov[1Q" of Albj.7711 1 11 - •i j .t •'n 2$ = 6.4L Yaller ih, NW / N1: 1/4 Svc Renton W,+ 98055 18 f A and 2l' ft E of i• .. 89 52' �f IA 4C ft. W of as measassaman in � th "35'12" W 577.01 in ft h .4 w W 913 1 of D t'BD th N 01)°49'1 E A. 2 ft to [leg 9 ;3 612 S. Flower St. 1/4 Sec 30-23-5 1/ Los Angeles, CA 90017 173433 ft 6 S 89052,01" r IT DOI COI 93 .21 ft TAP 40 ft Wly Sd uh th S 01-35-12 W 0. no o less TM 20 ft N °4 '10" r 520.05 ft to DO ++1vIP fc Pf e11na c.o. Th Re 1n0 [t o[ the 1705b 94 t�^ /� r t �-J 1 Al Soc 30-23- y. W 5 SW h le, St Rw Suh.l - Arl Glacllr Faek CO. 1: I,rl S orf tl tx t 91487 08 CITY OF RENTON 4w ,cement Kell for 'Iacal Improvement District No. 1QA.._.." Created by Ordinance Ne. 3138 Entitled 'An Ordinance providing for the Improvement at .LAnd..Ave, $W,_$W. 0.1p.,...$,_6_SW_34t8 St . _. oratal►tloa or UAL mATr Ms+r nr aatlML am am A WAM Mavrt or +r sllaaat parobn 11frtY1t7T \ IYT. Co. S. LOT all. ADDITION ON FIAT "Mason Y\glall10 alaexr ANUM lacier Park Co. 1 1 Burl N Orillia 9191177 437 Central Bldg. it ino r I K Henton vi 610 3rd Ave. Seattle, WA 98104 / i a John G unning 6 1 Barl N Urlllie _ Ind Pk Renton 41 Dery ice Pa er is _ 1100 Andover Park W. Ila '- Tukwila WA 98188 � Gleo Le 7 2 Burl N Orillia 0 714 437 Central Bldg. Ind Pk Renton /1 11 810 3rd Ave. Seattle, WA 98104 G acier !,ork Co. 6 2 Burl N Orllltn 1^ 437 Central Bldg. Ind Pk Renton vl 810 3rd Ave. ea runewick Corp. 5 211B.,l N Or1 la 90184 f F.C, Pankenberry '.P, Flanntn 6 AJm Sn.1 4ereur, Mar Lne 1439 Pioneac Rd. and Du Lac Wis. 54v35 Lot 1 J �H Center Fenton WA 980§^ ^— 1 2021 152nd Are. NI, Cmut/Banton CITY OF RENTON Ammosoment Roll for `1cra1 ImproIeoent ih>trtct No. 1O2 " Cf"%d by Ordiumm Ne....733f1,.__,.... Entitled •An Ordlunce yro"dmt for the Imyrorement of LIND AVE .SV! BV„41eq_L„Sii, 74ttt St.,,,„. atertt►Tla a am aetat' a[IMr ly t[Ja11St aver NQQ Or INKS MU11t t1 UlUO[tA eanmrr InTGLS( ! m1eT. �, SDn ITi PI a r1AT !!lUfOr U Spl.lLlt[> M�t'et e110.'Ir' aL'S. LC' [LL. Koll/lntereal Northers I ,Ito240 !I 2021 152nd Ave. NP. Center/Renton A 'a Glacier "ark I, I t, Burl N Orillia 2110 .421 it 1 11 Iq 710 - I I a r Park Co, turl ti 0gill ij 1514 .82 437 Cen ral d 810 3rd Ave I1acler Park Co. 111.114 1 ' 11 437 Central Bldp. nd Pk N.nton 02 11 610 3rd Ave. ,cattle M.A 98104 t lacier Park Ce. + 610 3rd Ave. Seattle W.4 981 n4 lacier Park . 1 5 ur \ �, ',• (lent ral P1`0 n.'. Pk ,.e^'en 810 3AI kY,. at le, I, - latter Pak Co. t.--.- 37 cemtrol. Uet. .nd rk Benton 02 CITY OF • Entitled 'An Ordisatic, Providing lot the 11011110'emtVIS Of Lind Ave. SW, SW41.pt...Slt.�. 41..SW- 34th St. ■ ' " ®I®ie��gI�I�I�I� ® I■I■I®L■I111■I i � .: , I LI�I■.11111■SIC ��I■I�I��I/111�1�1�- ® ■I{9lI�1!'ll�l!!#FIG" ' ■��.I■I■I�! �!/111.1 ■ �I■I■ICI � ��111■I ■ .I■I■I�I..t/111■I I� ® 437 .I I.I I� INII.I�I IN W WIN C�!!1l.�!II,l��11�.1.1.1 �■■I%111�1�1 !'� �IlAl�A'll!!!•��i� ll■I�Il� ® ■I/1I�IL.I/111■I�I� �.aid Ella■111�1 � i�'�I�I�.I/111.1 ► ■ ■IM'il�Ail..1/111. .��.I�i�ll� � � I..11111■t�� _■li�ltll�l�■I■111■i�l� ■ � MINIMI�I� OWN C ■ ■!■ i�a/11 0 I�I�r OF RF z PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT DESIGN/UTILITY ENGiNEE RINi, 0 235-2631 n � F AIUNICIfp.l BUILDING lad Mlll AVE SO RENTON.WASH aa055 e rfO SEpTE P BARBARA Y. SHINPOC- MAYOR MEMORANDUM Date: October 12, 1984 To: Finance Department From: Don Monaghan, Design Engineer Re: Special Deposit Cascade Septic Service Inc. posted a cash bond in the amount of $10,600 for miscellaneous work which they needed to com- plete in conjunction with LID 314. This work has been com- pleted; therefore, would you prepare a check in the amount of $10,600.00 payable to Cascade SepV c Service. Inc. and forward to me for delivery to the contractor. Thanks: :jft k C OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY* RENTON,WASHINGTON V � � � .04,e+.q•w aaa wo s na a+ct, • acn+a, wahNW, MNr to-NN LAWRENCE I WARREN, G,v u,ryns DANIEL KKLLOGG. n•p•+w+N+r wrtew*r DAVID M.DEAN, aaw+•wr t+e.0 aw. xKt MARK E.aARM, .ws+ , ZANETTA L FONTEa, uw+w+cnv.s+rr,y+ September 12, 1984 MARTHA A.TRENCH,.wa+w+Gn n++ema+ TC: Barbara Y. Shinpoch, Mayor FROM: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney RE: Cit. of Renton/We/LID 314 Dear Madam Mayor, Please find enclosed the final pleadings on the action brought by BEMP aggainst the City of Renton on LID 314. The f'-st document is an agreement to settle the action and the .econd document is an order signed by the Judge approving the agreement to settle the action. This now fully terminates the litigation involving the confirmation of the final assessment roll in LID 314, The City may now proceed with the selling, of the bonds and puc this long and troublesome Local Improvement District behind it. If you have any questions please feel free to contact me. Lawrence J. Warr.,, LJW:nd Encl . cc: Mike Mulcahy Ted Bennett Dick Houghton Members of Renton City Council 1 3 4 IN THE SOPERTOR COURT OF WASHINGTON FOR KING C:`iNTY 5 JACK MCCANN. DELBERT BENNETT, ) MARCUS PAP.TIN and PATRICK FASTER, ) N0. 84-209?11-4 6 d/b/a BDQ ASSOCIATES, a ) Washington general partnership, ) AGREEMENT TO SETTLE ACTION 9 ) Appellants , ) 8 ) vs ) 9 ) CITY OF PENTON. ) 10 1 Appellee ) 11 12 -- - 13 THIS !UTTER having, come on regularly before the undersigned 14 Judge of the above entitled Court upon Stipulation of the parties 15 as evidenced by the signatures of th, principals of BEMP and their 16 attorney, Richard Conrad of Hardwick t. Conrad, and the City of I" Renton by and through its City Attorney, Lawrence J. Warren of 18 Warren 6 Kellogg, P. S. , the Court having reviewed the file and 19 this Agreement , due cause appearing therefor, it is hereby 20 ORDERED AS FOLLOWS: 21 1. The City of R-,.ton shall reduce the Local Improvement 22 District assessment of LID 1314 for the parcel owned by BEMP 23 to the total assessment amount of $182.500 00 24 2, The City shall further permit BEMP to make its LID 25 payments over a period of 14 years rather than the 15 years permitte. 26 by Ordinance, with BEMP not required to make the first payment 29 0: its LID ass ssment , but that amount t.- accrue and be spread 28 AGREEI:ENT TO SETTLE ACTION - 1 WARaaN a KtLLOOO R.a. ac \.\ \I\\1 r• I over 14 years beginning with the first payment on year 2 of the 2 assessment pa-. nents. 3 DATED: 1934. 4 5 6 Presented by: e rence J. W an, t orney r City of Renton 9 10 Approved for ETltr 11 acc _ 12 ar art atrtc • as,,er 14 I e or ennet 1 17 QOJ 7 McCann 18 ` Lc ar anrad.'iur Rr`.'p ;A� ,t�e,�w/ •� : , , .. 0 21 22 23 94 95 26 27 28 AGREEMEVI TO SETTLE AC-,ION 2 WNIRLN a Me LLOGG. ♦a n rmeP•• e Y PO YrvenP{,. Pw ee, � 1 •u+w 'So sale •e. Maa1 ' ne w.e 1 2 3 4 5 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON' FOR KING COUNTY 6 JACK McCANN, DELBERT BENNETT ) MARCUS PARTIN 6 PATRICK EASTER, ) 7 dba BEMP ASSOCIATES, a Washington ) NO. 64-209211-4 general partnership ) g ) ORDER APPROVING AGREEMENT Appellants ) TO SETTLE ACTION 9 vs ) } 10 CITY OF RENTON ) 11 Appellee ) 12 13 THIS MATTER coming on regularly fo - hearing before the 14 undersigned Judge of the above entitled Court upon Motion for 15 an Order to approve Agreement to Settle Action, the Court havinj� 16 been tendered a copy of an Agreement to Settle Action bearing 17 the signatures of three of the four principals of BENP Associates , 18 and farther having represented with an Affidavit of Laurence J 19 Warren , City Attorney for rae City of Renton, indicating that he 20 had received oral agreement with the remaining signatory , Mr. 21 Patrick Easter, to sign the Agreement , and his signature having 22 inadve-ently been omitted from the documents, and the Cite of 23 Renton having substantially changed its position on the strength 24 of the Agreement to Settle Action, due cause appearing therefor. 25 it is hereby 26 ORDERED that the Agreement tk- Settle Action he and the same 27 is hereby approved by this Court and all further proceedings in 28 !i1 WARNeN a Na 4LQa6 •eL .mat.. . ORDER APPROVING AGREEMENT TO SETTLE ACTIOX - l "'""' "••""°•"•'°" all$n. 1 this action are terminated on the strength of the settlement 2 without cost to eithet party. S DOSE I% OPEN COURT this av f � 1984. 4 5 QN11 COYktIMN a Presented by, 7 E 7 Lawrence J. a;fen ty 4 Attorney for-6* City of 20 Renton 11 12 15 13 15 16 17 is 19 20 21 22 23 2S : 5 WARREN ► KELL000, P.S. CITY OF RENION, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. 18ya_ AN ORDINANCE OF TPE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 3815 (APPROVING AND CONFIRM- ING THE ASSESSMENTS AND ASSESSMENT ROLL OF LOCAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO, 314) AMENDING ASSESSMENTS FOR CERTAIN PROPERTY OWNERS WHEREAS the City of Renton did adopt Ordinance No. 3815 approving and confirming the Local Improvement District assessment roll for 314, and WHEREAS the City of Renton has determined that certain assessments therein should be modified to correct errors, inconsisten- cies or inequities in the assessment roll, now therefore THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I : Section I of Ordinance No, 3815, dated June 11, 1984, is amended to read as follows Section 1 That the assessments and assessment roll of Local Improvement District No. 314 which has been created and esta1tlished for the purpose of paying the cost of construction and installation of certain water mains, hydrants, and appurtenances thereto, and all as more partic�ilarly described 'n Ordinance No. 3559. further reference hereby had thereto, and all in accordance with said Ordinance, be the same is hereby in all things approved and confirmed, so that the total amount of the assessments and assessment roll of said Local Improvement District is in the sum of *t.956,510. 30. -1- SECTION U Section II of Ordinance No. 3815 dated June 11. 19b4 is amended to read as follows . .* ,t,on II . That each of the lots, tracts , parcels of lane and r property shown upon said assessment roll is hereby determine declared to be specially benefited by said improvement in at lea.,- the amount charged against the same, and the assessments anpearinp .gatnat the same are in proportion to the several assess- ments appearing upon said roll.. There is hereby levied and assessed against —ch lot, tract or parcel of land, or other property appearing upon a. . .. roll, the amount finally charged against the same thereon, except the following. Parcel 16 shall be assessed the amount of $16 ,857.84 Parcel 17 shall be assessed the amount of $21,420. 76 Parcel 46 shall be assessed the am.)unt of $88,214.04 Parcel 12 shall be assessed the amount of $182.500.00. To the extent that these assessments do not cover the entire cost of the local Improvement District , the City of Renton shall contribute such money as is necessary to fully fund the Local Improvement District. Such funding may take the form of decreasing the payment to the City for its work on this project or the form of paying a portion or portions of LlD liens for parties whose liens have been adjusted. SECTION III : All other parts of Ordinance No. 3815 shall remain in full force and effect. _2_ SECTION IV: This C:dinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval and five days after publication, PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this 20th day of August, 1984. Maril� rsen, neputy City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this 20th day of August , 1984. RO ert 1u cs, Ma r Pro t� em Approved as to form: awre�7- n, LIty _ttorney Date of Publication: August 24, 1981 -3- OF. kF rr o5 r o PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ¢¢ _ DESIGN/UTILITY ENGINEERING • 235 2631 t1 MUNICIPAL 1RALOINO 100 MILL AVE.SO. RENTON,WASH.OOM e P 9�rFD SEet LK'0t' BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR June 7, 1984 1, Cascade Septic Service, Inc. P.O. Box 44010 Tacoma, WA 98444 Attention: Mr. Mark Perry Re: L.I.O. 314 Gear Mark: As we discussed, the attached list represents those items which remain to be completed on the above-referenced Pro- Sect. In order for your retainage to be released, you will need to Provide me with a cash bond of $10,6130.00 which represents 150' of the cost to perform this remaining work. Once all the work has been satisfactorily completed, the money will be returned to you. If you have any questions, please advise. Very truly yours, Donald G. Monaghan. P.E. e Design Engineer :Jft Attachment Inspect and Repair Type 11 CB's Lump Sun E.V. Rs. STA 25+67 _- J 28+00 - 29+26 - 41+18 - 53+52 56.50 60+32 62+50 65+35 Readjust Valve Boxes 6 ea. P $75.00 ea. E.V. Rd. STA 21+28 31+19 33+84 36+08 37+19 42+72 Readjust H2O Vault E.V. Rd. STA 29+28 S.W. 34th St. 6 East Valley Road Adjust Valve Boxes 2 ea tz S75.00 1 E.V. Rd. STA 39+27 Lt. S.M. Corner 16th St. 8 Lind North driveway for "Rainier Disposal" on Maple to be paved. Par= behind Mobil Oil - Emergency Access Noad. Seal crack in front of Merlino's. Air test 8 seal, if necessary, following storm lines 35+00 (35+07) (27th) N 12" storm has bad joint. S. 12" storm has bad joint. 73+30 (East Valley Rd.) grade break in crossing. Re-TV sanitary sewer on S.W. 16th St. Deliver three monument cases 6 covers to City Shops. -Note MH's south of 34th St. to be checked. )j DAILY INSPECTION DIARY REPORT DAY: DATE: WORK PERIOD;_ a.m./p.m. WEATHER: TEMP. MAX —or MI%, —*F PRECIPITATION: WORK ACCOMPLISHED TODAY: CONTRACTOR SICRATUAl DATE: CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. 3823 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON. AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 3815 BY EXTENCING THE PERMISSIBLE TERM OF PAYMENT FOR THE ASSESSMENTS LEVIED THEREBY WHEREAS the City of Renton did adopt Ordinance No. 3815 approving and confirming the assessments and assessment roll for Local Improvement District No. 314, and providing for the payment of such assessments into the Local Improvement District Fund, and WHEREAS that Ordinance established the permissible term • of payment of the assessments at 10 years, and WHEREAS it is necessary and advisable to extend the term of the p,,yments to the permissible term of fifteen years, NOW THEREFORE THE CITY C.UNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON. DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: The first sentence of Section III of Ordinance No. 3815 is hereby amended to read as follows. "That the assessment roll as approved and confirmed shall be filed with the Director of Finance for collection and said Director of Finance is hereby auti,orized and directed to publish notice as required by law, stating that said roll is in his hands for collection and that payment of any assessment thereon or any portion of said assessment can be made at any time within thirty days from date of first publication of said notice, without penalty, interest or cost and that thereafter the sum remaining unpaid may be paid in fifteen equal annual installments with interest thereon fixed at an estimated rate of 12% per annum, except that if the net effective interest rate fixed on the local improvement bonds hereafter issued for Local Improvement District No. 314 is other than 11 1/2% the interest rate on the unpaid assessments shall be revised to a rate of 112 of 1,, in excess of the net effective interest rate on such bonds , such rate to be fixed hereafter by ordinance. " SECTION II. All other portions and parts of Ordinance No. 3815 shall remain in full force and effect , SECTION III. This Ordinance shall be effective upon its passae,e, approval and five days after publication. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this _9th day of July , 1984. Mar 4) J�erse�nDeputyC ty Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this 9th_day of July, 1984. Bar7ar rtc .ni , Bar ara :npoc �y�r Approved as to form: Laurence J. warren, cyAtttorney Date of Publication. July 13, 1984 to 1. THE CITY OF RENTON MUNICIiAI BUIL01N0 200 Mltt AVE 40. RENTON.WARM.SOON wY p7 BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR • MAXINEE.MOT0,1, CITY CLERK a (206) 235-2500 lEb �P�EV' June 27, 1994 Mr. Stephen Crane Crane, Stamper, Bosse, Dunham c Rogers 3SO Grand Central on the Park Seattle, WA 98104 Subject: Local Improvement District No. 314 Revised Assessment - Correction of Square Footage Pace Industrial Group Dear Mr. Crane: At the June 4, 1994 public herring before the Renton City Council regarding L.I.D. No. 314 you advised an error had been made in square footage calculations for your client's property and re- quested review prior to final assessment. A copy of the correct deed has been obtained by the City's Public Works Department supporting your claim and correction of the final L.I.D. No. 314 assessment roll has been made as follows: CORRECTED ASSESSMENT FROM: TO: Parcel 16 Pace Industrial Group $17,547.60 $16,857.84 Parcel 17 Pace Industrial Group $22,414.58 $21,420.78 The revised assessments are being submitted to the Finance Department for collection. For your information the 30-day period for prepayment without interest ends on July 27, 1984. You will receive a notice of payment from the Finance Department. Yours truly, CITY OF RENTON y;,, �I.co.ry 6 R 0;Ot� Maxine E. Motor City Clerk CC: Pace Industrial Group 16301 NE Sth, 4251 Bellevue, WA 98008 bcc: Council President .Pubiic Works Director Finance Director OF RF � 1T PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT OR _ .DESIGN/UTILITY ENG',NEERING 0 235 263) 09 MUNICIPAL BUILDING 300MILLAVE SO. RENTON,WASH 99055 F �P rfp SE pIE� BARBARA V. SHINPOCH MAYOR MEMORANDUM Date: June 25, 1984 To: Michael Mulcahey, Finance Director From: Don Monaghan, Design Engineer Re L.I.D. 314 Assessment Roll Parcel 16 8 17, Pace Industrial Group The area used in computing the assessment for Parcels 16 and 17 has been determined to be incorrect- I have secured a copy of the deed in which the property in question was transferred to support these findings. Therefore, would you please change the assessments for the two parcels as listed below: Parcel 16 $16,857.84 Parcel 17 $11,420.78 The property owner should receive official notificacion of this change. Per discussion with Larry Warren, the City will absorb r. ence rather than reassess it. :jft cc: Mayor Shinpoch Dick Houghton Maxine Motor Larry Warren PACE INDUSTRIAL GROUP 16301 N.E. 8th, 4251 Bellevue, Washington 98008 June 8, 1984 Mr. Richard C. Houghton Public Works Director - City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 Re: Pace Industrial Group LID #314 Dear Mr. Houghton: In follow up to our telephone conversation yesterday; enclosed is a certified map from the King County Assessor's Office which has square footage of our two parcels as calculated by the Assessors Office. One parcel (0005) is 76,600 S.F. and the other parcel (0006) is 99.650 S.F. for a total square footage of 176,' S.F. Please note that we do not own 3 of the vacated street to the west of our property. The previous owner, Mr. tone, negotiated away his half to the owner of the parcels to the of the vacated street. Please adjust our LID 0314 assessment t,, reflect the reduction of ;,r square footage as shown on the assessment to!). Also, give me writ- 'tn notification as to my revised LID $314 assessment. Thank You in advance for your attention to this matter. Sincerely, *;av413. Smi h Managing General Partner Pace Industrial Group cc: Larry Warren Steve ;sane a ---•-_-•.--ems t..,»v.•(:1.4.1 fhOntER t/Ai IONAI TItIE tNtiURAttO( IFa�tut�ro*tat ecorwtt vtt t �1XitnVAt /N uy Fibd IW Retard at 1tt•quest'I „ay .-•7�j f711'ba llry M S V TO Andrrro� Evans, Craven Leckie North 22' _Noll St. 1202 Spokane, WA 99201 a 0&. 2-,. "BCt• 1' ...tu, Quit CIULM Deed r r( A •6 II fV tte ca►sral John M. and Suzanne Stone, too set to..n.twt.t&aa at Settlement of Kin County Cause No. 19-2- 022:; .eeaat *"a"it t&.te to Martin A. Seeliq me tell—too do•trtw Cast *state, H,wtN In the cmiay +f King f[*[s A Wshi,gtan IM14diK •nt lnta••t ehrrala M•luh er.ntn •ey Mteetter ogatta: TP: it1LR WITH th11t portion of vacated Taylor Avem.•i s.U. between SW 21st Street and 23rd under Ordinatv,e No, 129". more particularly describe,* as foliowst The easterly one-half of Taylor Ave. SW (918t Ave ; having a width of 30 fet•t more or *eau, lyina st•utn^t I of the w^storly production of the northerly line of [n,r Twenty-six (26) , block one (1) , C.O. HILLMAN'S FARLItl•1TnN GARDENS ADnITION oIVISION No.i as recorded in Volume 17 Of Plata, Page 74, records o° sane, County, Washinqton :v. ' lyinq northerly of the north right-of-way line of SW 23rd extended and adiasent to Lots Fifteen (15) through Twenty-six (26) , inclusive, Block one (1) , said plat. Situated within the Southweat quarter (SWtll of Section 19. Township 23 North, RAnae 5 Post, W.NAvW NO MISE TAX sated this t+JAM931A96u1a day at Jan•unry, 1981. e Vl _ \] . .....*fun J01 14:"S1't1H .......... tt•tt or wxlwta, watt »t Spokar,, IL OR to'" d*I ret*o.*llr •rested wtwo as John 71. Ftofa3 and Suzanne St ant, to se ►nw•e to M she La t»td,.*1g •k".1ted to sea Mt ".,.two tM with&% oti torte" kmtt.a*4t 0•a1 tatnettledpd that they tleeta th* sot as their ttoe and »al4ntory at art 0.04, tor it, 4&4e end rytf4wa lMte la sentioaed. t t aloft*finds, q t,4" ono otltelol $*.1 Oae 4ataet robe Ie pI Iu tee fbfr ,i *y...t%a. Naha+t of ?).Jva114 ,t CA :' y IZ ZI 12 W 21 j it h Lc ! ul 70 .fit - IJ R 20 t• H 2 In - 1,3 W IS SSAC IT le IA pl'` !A{ _ s^ _ W- � TA , ♦ 1 ♦ I O \ . 1 ^ ' p x 3` 0 w1 Ir l It 2d 2s 90 110 7 e . p es y I ; ^ =' 1 ,f•fi �2 i2e S to LeI` CIDZe — I L 25 ♦ 25 �- ' ♦ Lis • ly -1 946.62 ,241110 N 7 S • it � s � \. ZI r ' : ,It .-• Owl to 20 to le 1• 11 .��. 1 2 � I• la a � le y,v � I ,• p -�'aii• �s -�'3 A seep S ST. _ sa•-ss.yw/� _ — 1. 40 "' Jr 1sae0y e.mytl e'U�natru?coq of 011 tows Q(1?, lduS�1O� roue 2 3 t, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON FOR KING COUNTY 5 JACK McCANN, DELBERT BENNETT, 1 MARCUS PARTIN and PATRICK EASTER, I 6 d/b/a bEMP ASSOCIATES, a 1 No. 54. 4" Washington general partnership, 1 7 ) NOTICE OF APPEAL Appellants, ) g ) VS. ) 9 ) CITY OF RENTON, ) 10 ) Appellee, ) 11 ) 12 1. Appeal . The appeilants hereby give notice to all in- 13 terested parties of their appeal for relief from City of Renton 14 Ordinance No. 3015 concerning the assessment associated with L.I .D. 15 INo. 314. 16 2. Property Description. The property subject to the 17 aslaessment and owned by the appellants is legally described on 18 Exhibit A a`_tached hereto. 19 3. Assessment. On June 20, 1984, City of Renton Ordinance 20 No. 3815 became effective in which the Property was assessed the 21 Isum of $267,386.04 for improvements pursuant to L.I.D. 314. 22 1 4. Objections to Assessment. Appellants object to the 23 assessment for the following reasons: A (a) The property owned by appellants is not specially bene- 15 11fitted by the improvements made pursuant to L.I.D. 314 as is neces- 26 Weary for assessment under RCW 35.44.010 and, therefore, the asstis �ment made in Renton City Ordinance No. 3815 was made on a funda- mentally wrong basis and/or the uecision of the Renton City Council j;was arbitrary or capricious and should not stand; and 3o p (b) The amount of the assessment, $267 ,386.04, contained 31 �in Penton City Ordinance No. 3815 upon appellants' property does 321inot bear any relationship to the special benefits, if any, conferre� MAROMCK A CONRAO NOTICE OF APPEAL p�+o.•uwrro.fRYff i> xxs wfu i upon the property by the improvements and, therefore, the assessmsn 2 should be set aside or re-evaluated pursuant to the laws Of the 3 I State of Washington 4 DATED this eeday of June, 1984. 5 HARDW CK 6 CONRAD 6 7 Richard C. Conrad Attorney for Appellants 8 STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ss. 10 COUNTY OF KING ) 11 JACK MCCANN, being first duly sworn on oath, deposes and says: 12 That he is one of the appellants herein; that he has read the 13 li foregoing Notice of Appeal, knows the contents thereof and believes 14 the same to be true. i n 16 J McCANN i 111I SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this -�2 ay of June, I 1s " 1984. 19 'Ili 20 i Notary P� lie in and for the State ashington, residing 21 at 22 23 24 25 26 � I 2y 31 NMOWICK a tONnW 112 - NOTICE OF APPF.A Lt4M He 1 ` EXIIIINT A Legal description: The North half of the Southwest Quarter of the Southwest quarter of Section 19, Township 23 North, Range 5; except the East 40 feet thereof condemned by the City of Renton in King County Superior Court Cause No. 847917 for Lind Avenue S.W. The South half of the Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of'.Section 19, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., in King County, Washington; except the East 40 feet thereof condemned by the City of Renton in King County Superior Court Cause No. 847917 for Lind Avenue S.W. HEIL, & M.C . SEELIG, INC. NOAANpL SEELIG - Prn NEW YORK — WASHINGTON hoErrrpnrl E,.pryN MARTINA SEELIG - SPc T,aM 76gP i7084500885 l¢rnaM MNErIrlr Mdr• Maauy Arprru P08u.1925 MILTONC SEELIG C E 1898 1971, Brur.w WA 98009 hdwna,n kr�yrw, 511.1 AMrra. 900 1701e N E ww1 . INA 88005 July 11 , 1984 Lion Monahan City of Renton Dept. of Public Works 200 Mill Ave. South Renton, WA 98055 Dear Xr. Monahan, The enclosed Quit Cliam Dead should clarify the question raised at a recent meeting between y and my brother, Howard. regarding owhership of the east half .,, 'Taylor Avenue between S.W. 21st and 23rdd'Streets. Martin A, Seelip MAS1ms JJJ Enclosure --.� JUL 1 2 38A1 CIY•iwul`t,uVt nni'aotf ftlkac tot'"Cont,i vn PIONEER NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE c 07 •L Fdrd for Rerurd at Requmt of ",',i'; C.i n� ^y TO Anderson Evans, Craven i ofC lacki! North ... wall 5t. t202 Spokane, WA 99201 CPSMSL ero+T„pig 11 WOW L 56 a 0 Quit Claim Deed C'1 N tta caAxm Jahn M. and Suzanne St r•n.• O_ Lee •M to eo.rtMndoa of Settlement of Kin+g Cooney i'ause No. 79-2-02225-0 ,.Vey am q.tt flat. to Martin A. Seelig the tolleet.e d•atrtM4 tool tstatt, eltuatwd In the Canty .f King State at V.ahinatM L.rludlM My Into,wt eh.,eln d,lth +tamer .1 MI-after eteolret ToGE'1'HER WITH that portion of vacated Taylor Avenue S.W. between SW 21st Street and 23rd under ordinance No. 1292, more particularly described as tollOwst The easterly one-half of Taylor Ave. SW (91st Ave.S), having a width of 30 feet more or less, lying southerly of the westerly production of the northerly line of Lot Twenty-six (2b) , Block One (1) , C.P. HILLMAN'S E.ARLINGTON GARDENS ADDITION DIVISION NO-1 as recorded in Volume 17 of plats, page 74, records of King County, Washington and lying northerly of the north right-of-way line of SW 13.rd extended and adjacent to Lots Fitteen (15) through Twenty-six (2E) . inclusive, Block One Mt said plat. Situated within the Southwest quarter (SWS) of Sectinn 19, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M. Uho N11i+1 6 S[ if+l Voted thla JAN2319M day at January, 1951. 1- M., , d rA tr d' 1ASM1uGtW. � :II C..nty of Spokanti an tat. day tantnally appeared tetora ea Jnhn tt. Stan, and Saranne Stone, t. ee. 1no..n to N the tMl.lduat4 Motr/Md /n end Mho ose..tod the .1thin and toeepelnp inn turret, aM atlnoultdded that they stand the seas as their ttoo t.•1 •.W.to' act 0.4 d..d, t.t 14. i . .... .,.4 p.ueotot thaaln a.ntlend. CIKM ender y MM aM o/t It lal opt thlo`alirl` doY�sf (�4J...pt=. . a. UP JUM i 41984 t 1 , III _ 3 I'" 4II � IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON FOR KING COUNTY S GARY MFRLINO CONSTRUCTION 1 . COMrhNY, a Washington 1 NO. Q ,A � ,) p 61,E partnership, 1 vY � ��7 � ,� �} �� 7 1 Appellant, 1 S 1 NOTICE OF APPEAL TO Vs. 1 SUPERIOR COURT 9 1 (RCP: 35.44.200 and .21v) CITY OF RENTON and RENTON 1 1D CITY COUNCIL, 1 1 it Appellees. 1 1 12 •- 13 GARY MERLINO CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, a Washington partnership, 14 seeks review by the Superior Court of the decision of the Renton 15 City Council approving and confirming the assessment roll levying is a special assessment against property located in LID t314, insofar 17i as that roll reflects assessments made against the subject proper t� 18 for watex mains. 19 The assessment roll of LID 4314 was approved and adopted by 20 Ordinance 43615, passed by the City Council June 11, 1994, with 21 an effective date of Wednesday, June 20, 1964. 22 Sub3ect Property is Item 146 on the LIr assessment roll 23 legally described as follcwst 24 SEC 30-23-05, Port NW 1/4 of NE 114 Ly Wly of W Mgn of Primary State Highway t5 i ly 25 I Ely of E Mgn of East Valley 41ghway LESS N IOC Ft. NOTICE OF APPEAL, TO SUPCRIOR COURT t Appellant objects to the assessment for water-main improve- 2 I sent& on the ground that t-ey have been inequitably apportioned S with respect to the subject property as compared with certain 4 other property in LLD #314. 5 Appellant further objects on the ground that the costs 6 assessed to the subject property for water-main improvements 7 exceed the special benefit conferred upon said property. 6 DATED this as-7 day of June 1984. 9 CASEY, PRUZAN 6 KOVARIK 10 tt By t2 Providence Worley of Attorneys for Appellant, Gary 13 Merlin Construction Company 1< ' 15 16 17 II 18 19 . 20 21 22 23 24 25 ��ameM NOTICE OF APPEAL TO SUPERIOR COURT - 2 SNnir MY�•Mf^V'O\ wrnr Bond No. U50 29 3� VNIZ'ED PACIFIC INETURANCE COMPANY HEAD OFFICE,FEOSfsA L WAY,WASHINOTON OW)VIN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OFWASJIIMGTON JUN a 7 WB4 In and tot_ Nkir,.__- __-- County alb;COl'N?Y StiFEAFJR COURT CLERK'S OFRCE 84 - 2 - 09124 - 0 - . No. oary Merlino Construction Company aa�o, APPEII.A.NT _ COSTS 9OgN APPE A I, City of Renton and Renton City Council ❑ &WO P0�14 OST50) A"EILEES KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, That a a. %ry wrlino Conatmetlon COMIRWRL a P•,mmxlltl.and UNITED PACIFIC INSURANCE COMPANY 9.dum undM d,e laws y{the Slah of Weahinyton,N Surety,are held and firmly bound unto CSLY O! Renton anQ Renton Ci, t�. _C011nel1 d No/1 oboes 1,amed,,n the iu,s and Wu SUM of Two Hun an� � s _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - IS 200.00_"__- I DOLLARS. leal,d monav of the Umted Slate+ of Amerma, for the davmenl of wh¢h,"I and truly to be made,WIN hmd Out91w,. OUr Lein.loyal tefwefenlaUWs,successor,u+d Mnym,lo,otly and Nwrally.tltmlV by these MMents. WMEAS, the above bound principal, has instituted an appeal in the Superior Court for King County, Washington, pursuant to RCW 3$.44.200, challenging the adoption of Ordinance No. 3815 by the Renton City Council. Nit, TWI ONE, it the above bound principal, Gary Marlino Construction Company, will prosecute this appeal without delay and, It unsuccessful, will pay all reason- able coats and expanse, not exceeding the am aforesaid, which the City of Reston incurs by reason of this appeal, then this Obligation shall be cold; otherwise it shall remain in full force and effect. Dated June 25 0 •• Marlin* Construction Company �ayy s,.d asw.a,eal. UNITED PA It IC INS U ANCE C MPANY Qr • John aCh n toer.ar.,larAci I ALSI APn R9Y■yE t;.4. II141t '111 t leg.. 19�. UNITED %MPIC INSURANCI COMPANY NIAOOFFICE FEOEIFAL WAY WASNtNGTON POWER OF ATTORNEY <NOW ALL MEN eY THEM Mt1i NT5.TaM Iti WIltO PACIFIC INf1RANtl COWANY..owOw.IHn a..l,w1P^•Na uroN•IPA NM YI IN VA.01{•IEFFINIft".e.N t-mlov rM,yMIf11N Aft. . JOHN KERSCH of SEATTLE, WASHINGTON--- K.YY.M I..Aw Alwlr,nfrl.N rM.,..rvn.Ia.t.Yb 1NIYYa a M y IN LNAN1..n1 r Iw rI.M atM ANY AND ALL BONDS AN", , nERTAKINGS OF SVRETYSM;I.----- Mato b.MIN!UNITED PACIFIC INSURANCE COWANY FWWV INIftWtoa,ArRr.NM,K•I NIMIIWnlat Ma Vna.iNl.N....00IMI wI.I, .PAa.IO.Y n IPA NNn IMnot wp.NEW"M I.,,.dl.y.11N UNITED PAC'FIC 06URANCE COWANY.na I.N.a..b NNNINI by.M pM101 YK11011KK 1.pa M•IOY W.1..na Op111uM.1. M1 gIWa AI1pMYI.In PKIIMY 00•n PWtWM MH01 Ra Ponw oI Aaplrr R rMl.a WHY.MEN.YaNwKY*'All"YR N IPA aY LE.I.oI UNITED PACIFIC INSURANCE COWANY,.Iten MF.rM Nlnl•N.S.OIFKON 1.IE».,rnKil pOMYMI M.Mw in Iw11KFA.b NIX.rrO.rlE N glgln ARTICLE VU- EXECUTION Of SONDS AND~t Rt A%,NGS 1 TM EOwtl Or oltwvs tM RNC.nt,tM CM^RYn 011N 00utl NV E.nrp V•C.PHVa.nr, "%V.4 Nt ov rM)or A4rPMt VK.hnrrlMt A, IIMI*It.,6N.ENI.a 0Y IPA Gove 01 D,woNo\N.11 MM ROM.M iu11W qY IO III Iaao-I PK•\M IO.w11p•N ENT 10.1.tw. MWWI OI 1M C., ...tooNs Ona uIUNt.,,NFr.rpuHMF.OOnIrKYt OI.Wynn.,wWO.wM.1•nat W."ory u.IMMIW.IN..O' MaSal IO rOngM MY MFI.All...IN F.Ot w.nt I.IM.M Hya..iM OOMI.na M11M1pIM EK.W 10 Nn 7 ANwM,FM-EKE RWI Nv.00Mn 1M Wtlgr.lY.NbIM 10 1M l4nF Mla t•T.IKgWIaIIMFgAIw oINIpMV WYM 1e 1RlIW,IO.Hiw1 M.10y.wM .1 No, Worm,' Op,NI MO.Ina.1 At,W HCOEII.b.N1l.bnlrMFOI rlldOnWgr MO O1Nw w^n.tp aaWIP,.1 r^IPANIUH IMrpl 11r Npb.I.N.rN q NI II..'wN.Ir Iw IPA WIq�Ir or Mr aMr.n0 Maw IN.11E,,1.CPFI.bnIM.coon Kll bI,lafwnitr Mtl oIM Vrr.Irlla4 Mvrlw,r n IN NIw.IM.MI AoOrgN.n'FM VNW No.porn•Vq W tMy. 10 pKw.111ynO,pynq lO OI nNI:WM Io banal,gtppNbNq[MIIKg O11pOn nqO 0' 01 n.•Mna.r•DNI al W401.11 ynaFr U\i11E!Ma INK tM11 Np ft.".Ma.ytlgrllY 10 C.rt.lt 1M InrMW RNKNWI a11M Cantpinr Ma ro.0.1.I IN Sr LEn..11N CoHy^r w Mr.nM.q.MrM'Woot TN..p1M bl .Np.M, .F#qNA,PVs 1bW br IKN.HIM VIIII.I PIItt b,WtWp.ln 01 IPA NFIIOYngO Row.",Ptlyra b.IPA S.""or 0•KH.♦p. UNITEOPACIFIC INSURANCE CI)bIPANY NF wNbp IVMM1M EIX yr 01 IVM A>1..1M¢W..uoIYm II.I p.Nnl,ylp rH b.o'Wo^WN Ito, 11Mna.a o.NWHO "RNAlVW to IPA Fyylwn OI tyW au1[gn wq 011 N.q yq IPA YYoI 1M COw1Mn.No,b N6..a bMr\VM 00uR•01 NIO.MY w M,Prt•1.O t..WI•np tWN110 br IK\•w.N ...MY NRn VOYRr W N1NMY OI pllggN about NNN H4.'n•I. YEntwH+w Nov.. WII M.04.M b."'N YM^IPA COnrnY W..,ININ y...r W..rwM.rq NII.0..0 by 1.4�'n.N NE/•.Ivn IPA I.V-4 ow IMn y.,.I.rb pna..N YOan iM COny^Y.n IN.1.o...'IF r .1pF!10 MY EO^O O. yWpIN.n010 MKW�I r\.IIKnM IN WII NESS WNFREOF tM UNITED PACIFIC INSURANCE COMPANY W rU4a IAw WNAN, lob Ny^.o br q.V.,.PIN.aM\,fM,N m•awn{ RN wyM•NO IpnM Im. 9th a,.1 March IS 84 E~v UNITED PRCY 1CINEURAN OMP NY V.ffO .LINTY OF x;ng o^1Wlt 9th M'.1 March 1%84 atw.xr FApwM Charles B. Schmalz In m.HNpnn 10 W In,VK.hNro.m o•FM UNIT/O PACIFIC INSURANCE COWENY bra Kt".Opa 1141,M xatwb Ma.mp.q IPA 1w♦ AMI nMY•^MII .na NIUIp IPA Ir.011 twpNatR^FNINO.W lM A11FXR VIE.S.,IYM 1,E,.I.a]b FM aY 1.M M rro Cgnww.Y .no IPA RNpNHw lot Iw1W IIW.M Y.RAI n Iw1 Iwn MY C.RIwNrw fl000mm, { J July 20 ,fa 86 �,•�an.' ";r r,a,, .N Vashln6t R.Nmr.1 N.i Itcr I MarleS J. Falakow ANiR.^I WN Nvr of w UNIIFO PACIFIC INSURANCE COWANV y MHD.ew Nlr IPA IPA "W"'la1M.EYAEK WNO.Ny IMIAN ySY.I.PVM pr AItpMY NIRYIa by r.a UNIlfO PACIFIC INSURANCE COWANY wY.N.•.......n lVu Ia4.na.11rl INM.1Nf SS WNER(()f,1F1W ANIMprtlPA Mno.m,Nr..M IPA I IrH Corny^.HA 26Eh 5...1 June 1$84 _\N aDV.t)I{0 Np \^Rtl AK.l,M1 EKHR.Y_ 1 1 I. 1 III 1� II 4 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON FOR KING COUNTY I 5 JACK KcCANN, DELBERT BENNETT, 1 MARCUS PARTIN and PATRICK EASTER, 6 d/b/a BEMP ASSOCIATES, a ) NO. I T ' 2 -nI Z 'Washington general partnership, 1 NOTICE OF FILING Appellants, ) TRANSCRIPT VS. 1 9i', ) 10 (CITY OF RENTON, 1 I 1 'I Appellee. ) 11 I 1 12 ITO% LAWRENCE J. WARREN, Attorney for City of Renton I 13 AND TO% MAXINE E. MOLER, Renton City Clerk i 14 YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED that% 15 (1) The transcript in the above matter was filed with r 16 Lithe King County Superior Court on �4r� t J4. ltot and 17 (2) That the date set for hearing on the appeal is I 1%' DATED thin 3 day o 1984. 20 HARDWICK 6 CONRAD 21 22 R c%ar C. Conrad 23 v Attorney for Appellants r. 24 � f 26 D . 2; 1 28 v 30 GTY CLERK L'I 3' 3' NurovncK a eo�+a.e NOTICE OF FILING TRANSCRIPT •^""'•""" Mt.a ry....,•«No.. - 1 II I CITY CLERK � i 2 i 31 4 IN THE. SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON FOR KING COUNTY 5 JACK MCCANN, DELBERT BENNETT, ) MARCUS PARTIN and PATRICK EASTE.R, ,I 6 d/b/a BEMP ASSOCIATES, a ) NO. C yZ1 I _4 Washington general partnership, ) 7 ) AFI'IDAVIT OF Appellants, ) RICHARD C. CONRAD ) n CITY OF RENTON, ) ) 10 Appellee. ) 11 STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) as. 12 COUNTY OF KING ) 13 RICHARD C. CONRAD, being first duly sworn on oath, deposes 14 and says: 15 i That he is the attorney for the appellants in the above- 16 lenti Led cause. The following documents are attached for filing 17 lin the above-entitled cause as required by RCW 35.44.230: 18 1. Assessment Roll; 19 2. City of Renton Ordinance No. 3815; and 20 j 3. The record of the Renton City Council with cef.+rence to I 21 the assessment. i 22 That the appellants object to the assessment of $267,386.04 �3 as set forth under Item No. L of the assessment roll for the 24 ;'reasons set out in their notice of Zan, on filleeherein. 25 � � RIC. CONRAD 271� SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this _ day of June. 28 ,I 1984. 2`, Notary Public in-and for the State of Washington, r«<iding 30 at 1 31 ' 32 '. r.rllgWicn•co~ �hF'FIDAVIT OF RICHARD C. CONRAD ,pp lvH4.Uw 11.nP.. N�•a.P...�s«.woof ,la«iN M.0 it i 3 4 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTOR FOR KING COUNTY 1 5 'JACK MCCANN, DELBERT BENNETT, ) M..RCUS PARTIN and PATRICK EASTER, ) 6 d/b/a BEMP ASSOCIATES, a 1 NO. Washington general partnership, 1 1 NOTICE OF APPEAL. Appellants, 1 B 1 VS. 1 91 1 CITY OF RENM:, 1 10 I 1 Appellee. 1 11 1 12 , 1. Appeal. The appellants hereby give notice to all in- 13 � teresteo parties of their appeal for relief from City of Renton 14 Ordinance No. 3815 concerning the assessment associated with L.I .D. I 15 Ij No. 314. I 16 lii 2. property Description. The property subleet to the i 17i'assessment and owned by the appellants is legally dencrit on 18 Exhibit A attached hereto. 19 ++ 3. Assessment. On June 20. 1984, City of Renton Ordinance 20 No. 3815 became effective in which the Property was assessed the 21 {sum of $267,386.04 for improvements pursuant to L.I.D. 314. 22 I� 4. Oblections to Assessment. Appellants objec to the I, 23 :assessment for the following reasons; ,14 (a) The property owned by appellants is not specially bene- i 25 fitted by the improvements made pursuant. to L.I.D. 314 as is neces- 26 nary for assessment unlor RCN 35.44.010 and, therefore, the assess- 2' r•,rnt made In Renton City Ordinance No. 3815 was made en a funda- 2c mentally wrong basis and/or the decision of the Renton City Council 2f ,was arbitrary or capricious and should not stand; and 30 I; (b) The amount of the assessment, 8261 ,386.04, contained 31 jin Renton City ordinance No. 3815 upcn appellants' prn-,erty does 32 ,not bear any relationship to the special nenefits, if any, conferred KMD,V,CK A CONNAD 11 - NOTICE OF APPFAI. """"•'" ray to we 1 upon the property by the improvements and, therefore, the assessmen 2 Ilshould be set aside or re-evaluated pursuant to the laws of the I' I� State of Washington. 4 DATED this 46 3 day of Jane, 1984. t 5 I� RARDW CK 6 CONRAD 11 6 � Conrad NI Attorney for Appellants 8 9 INSTATE OF WASRINGTON 1 �i 1 as. 10 I Ji COUNTY OF KING 1 11 JACK McCANN, being first duly swnro on oath, deposes and says: 12 Ii That he is one of the appellants hereinl that he has read the l3 Iltoregoing Notice of Appeal, knows the contents thereof and believes 14 i; t.he same to be true. i� 15 ANN 16 '•i; J McCANN n I,, S"IbSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this 'day of June, lv '� - Notary P lic in and for the II State ashington, residing 21 at _ 22 23 2.4 N k H a6 P S 27 � y 2A 29 s: I MAROWICK a CONRAD I ] - NurICE OF APPEAL '�"""'•' " I M.M M.5++..•e..NL111 ,nv.tn>Me E KI1I RIT A Legal description: The North half of the southwest quarter of the Southwest quarter of Section 19, Township 23 North, Range 5; except the East 40 feet thereof condemned by the City of Renton in King County Superior Court Cause No. 847917 for Lind Avenue S.W. The South half of the Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 19, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.N. , in King County, Washington; except the East 40 feet thereof condemned by the City of Renton in King County Superior Court Cause No. 847917 for Lind Avenue S.W. OF Rk' PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT DESr;N:UT'.. Jv ENGiNF.E RiNi; 235-2631 C' Ink . ,!h' MUNICIPALBUILDING NWMILLAVE SO. RENTON.WASH.9RO55 r P E rEO SE"E�'0 BARBARA Y. S,uNPOCH February 16, 1984 MAYOR MEMORANDUM TO: Gary Norris, Don Miller, Larry Saviage FROM: Don Monaghan SOBJECT: IID N314 S.W. 43rd, East Valley to West Valley, L.I.D. N314 will be accepted by the City in the near future. There is minor painting and cloan-up to be done in the spring. If you have any questions, please call. —Ton nag an :ckd SCATEMENT Of COMPLIANCE .. ........aN, Din w....c. .ty..ida�-316H Aug 9, 19B Vito D. Graziano _ _ payroll Supervisor a.awry•Lie Segel fl•rw..1«I•.•.r marl S*9al rp Pr,wn..e-D Y• > M.A. e, Inc- Cascade Septic th.l du,.AII tar PrYAII pedel wmmrn<Inl en tM 29t31 d.].1 flmlrm[IN .«11 --- July 119 B4 end ending the 4ttt arT M Aug 30 Md •11 Pm�la ]rd en 1.i6 aleletl he•.Wen Peed the Iell.real. .......med,the, Iw vE.1r1 I,.,Fern e1.111 he mid.etlaer d-1-011 el RI- IF le m en Meal el...d___ M.A. Se9a1e, Inc. I•em IN. I'm ..Ly .."...med b, are, P«.. m eeeua mna h.•r Mrn..a. "IN.,enevb e.I.dve<ty l,em the lull ..[.a...w.d Ly .n.M..... mad•Ihm Prrmn«ale M .+a delln.d IN Re[almena. FAA 3(Ta CFR Sv&'N.A), L ue0 EY lad 3rrnuq el WMr.ne•1 the C.P•;•nd Acl, .mended m. fILU S.., )D[, I]lrm at? 76 St., 337. to V.S C ]Y6<), r.4 af..o4M4 Mlew wltNlolding FICA ./ Mod Aid T., IN, .•>reil.etA«.Le wdrr IM. <an„«I reow.ed,o M +vem.,La 1«the ann., {.nod.. doer,.M<on.plele, la.,IA. Itte IN .,..d mtethel envM[IN-' o a � IN' iol.A rn•on.n..I..h the• n Ior..,APb.erer m Re ca.nc wn4nwdvlta the-.,Y.e P.".,i..d TT.,m . ........mDle,ea N• .M•r pened.n dul......Ined IN.Mn.I.d. .Na • rnbreaa I...............d N,the Bu.e.0 el AP1,—Uc1...1 and T.umng. Dml.d SLIe.Drn.rt—N,el L.I e,. D1 It nP .urn rt!prig en+u m.S...., •r. •.purud ..IA the Be,...PI ADP•env<r+M+.ne T,«mng Unurd SIeI.+pegnme« of LAM, Tau to,•HF.NE FRINGE BENF.i113 ARE PAID TO APPROVED PLANS. FUNDS. OR PROGWABS cxkIn•dbuen le IN.be., Aourlf ..[e a e+Y.Id .e.1h bAera,aI Inled In'he .Mir vir gem•a P.ymlt.P.,mrnL el Ilk,brn.bn A.I..l.d m he r.nb.a Ae.r Sr.n e..dl M male to rp P,eP.•.Ir Pro[umw le•the MnrDl el .uch.mPle, rr.. ..I'., ..„n,,d In Mrl,on dal MI.. IU)!WERE FN:NOL BENEFITS ARE PAID IN CASH �. E.,N LM..,a erM«< I,.,`d eA the rbAowl io.�.re.Dr Y loa vir .meu 1.1 IA.Nd,u..n to nRrepew�l�l. .�I•rlran nn,Ar I...the.IN. .mn el the .DP , ••[r P a• n e 1 a Douro. •.c Tr....I'd m vumn Mct Mle.. {d EACEF TION3 -- A. ''&to D. Graziano. Payroll Sspett•isor // ✓ - r,t,, ee,R.1 bU,Lue«1 of enr.1 A..aew r .•w,.mo mareu N•.......... ... .wu.e{.,re r.rJ a nm w.r Fu.eronr. See na+. #001.1 7.11e IS and Set"eme ' o ll a114,Unnrd lour C.O. PC... 879 .....Rr.a ..,e.. ... ...P.r,a. ® r 'i k� w14"'Ar AA+ rJ✓ ,;�.a., r� .� SuY'�' Ak t� , ;r,w¢,. .I _ 1 .ern' r- � � .. / dm ?'. .. ,. �s �j _Tw• c. 7F/fs T? 'F'e V fA '00 If OF RFti �. 11f A OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY* RE NTON.WASHINGTON }V � °"� Z .osr a.•¢a•a.aaa too s a•a s+aar • .a.•a «.s«.c•a. s•oa• a+aaw g LAWRENCE I WARREN. c�•.mo.•w• DANIEL KELLOGG, +ass••.+a•••••tl•a1• e DAv, M DEAN, nsn.n• c•.••r••na- �{Q,' MARK E.RARHER. •aan••••+ a+•••+•••+• rto stot Ea•' ZANETTA L TONTES. .aaa•u.+ c,•••••o•pa• July 18, 1984 MARTHA A FRENCH,•as s••n• c.+••••o• e• TO; Ted Bennett, Deputy Director FROM; Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Dear Ted: As you may :chow, we were sued by Gary Merlino on LID ir3L4. We reduced his assessment $13,000.00 in o,der to settle the diepute. Mr. Merlino would like the reduction credited to his first LID payment, which in effect, would leave the assessment at the same level but would simply have the City make the first payment o: payments. As 1 understand it, you could not give me exact figures until the bonds have been sold and the interest rate established. However, I would like you to presume an interest rate at or about the current market rare for LID bonds and then do the calculations for ne. I would ask that you presume three rates, one at the present market rate, one at 1% above and the last at 1% below the market. rate. Do the calculations and show me hew the City's payments would be applied. If you have ary questions , please feel free to contact me. Lawrence J. Warren LJW:nd cc Mayor Dick Houghton of RFC OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY• RENTON WnSHINGTON Q 100 a lM Sr•fP • MnrOn w•lrrmGrOn NO!• Of MA LAWREN.�E 1 WARREN, nr..rru.ne. DANIEL KELLOGG, •ssu•••.* a••{••aMf• e DAVID M.DEAN. mnan. C.I.•••w•f• MARK E.BARBER, •1111u.1 a••.11�1 Sato SE'l ZANF.TTAL FONT Ea. •svlr•e+ cu11-11 w41 June 13, 1984 MARTHA A FRENCH.•sss•.n+ ter•e••auna• TO: Don Monaghan FROM: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attornev RE: Statement for Appraisal Services Dear Don: At,-ached please find the statement from J. Ralph Gilbo for appraisal services for properties in the Renton LID #314. ' Lawrence J. Warren LJW:nd Encl. cc: Mayor BANK OF TACOMA Account Credit WE TODAY CFM;mo u 1 i! 'T161, VO(M ACCOUNT FOR rNf FOUOWiNG 06-12-84 Transfer of funds from 09F4-62999 8 per Rot Worh. .,. ACCOUNT NUMetR CeaWeD —� Rank of Tacoma ,.a Retainege Agent for 0987-50006 3 Cascade Septic Service, Inc. * - City of Renton Project C3 0••116,489.16•• � �:i 2 5 1064 94�: 096 7w SOf�Oi,9•' J. Ralph Gilbo Real Estare Appraiser tc Consultaw.. — ---— ------.. _----- h10N 93N STREET SEATTU.WASH MN TIN 401103 RIONE ('%)S:3-1143 u Y..ail s '' "' " June 11. 1994, Mr. Laurence J Warren City Attorney, City of Renton 100 South Second Street Post Office Box 626 Renton, Washington .0057 Re: .Appraisal Services in Renton L.I.D. 314 Dear Mr. Warren, In complete and final payment for appraisal services on the following properties in Renton L.I.D. 314, Broadecres property (Parcels 20, 78. 79, and 90). A-Economy Storage property (Parcels 16 and 17) . Garfield Assoc. , Ltd. property (Parcels 24-1) TOTAL: ?1 , 50,00. J. f:alnh Gilbo 76i/ii'/�/t. sr/.fv .0 co 7tv. n.� CHARTER 116, LAWS Of 1909 CITY OF RCNTON CERTIFICA711014 i M!uMlhrJNp r0....bt CGrg,V n Ln p p YA4 P:Alyp. ::K LY:A MII?bMip M JMAND M"M'\'141,1'lhit 1,1j f:h M AYµ', \YD LMI :{M •u:M.ML'.'W��,4//+M11T4/uyWl nnM\t, YJ1 CWY 1rYYD v� .LJM�� I OF Re i � T R z THE CITY OF RENTON MUNICI►AL WILDING 200 LNLL AVE a0 RENTON O WASH. GEE2j2 BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH. MAYOR • MAXINE E.MOTOR. ft CITY CLERK a (20a) 235-2500 P ,lFC yErt E� June 12, 1984 Mr. Richard Conrad Hardwick and Conrad 300 Evergreen Building , Renton, WA 98055 Re: Local Improvement District 314 lmprovements ir. the Area of East Valley Highway; BEMP Associates Asses Lent Dear Mr. Conrad: Your letter of June 11, 1984 requesting reconsideration of the assessment against the BEMP Associates property, was presented to the Renton City Council at Its regular meeting on June 11, 1984. The Council reviewed your letter and advised the matter had been duly considered at the public hearing on June 4, 1984. For your information, the City Council ado.ted Ordinance No 3815 on June 11, confirming the final assessment roll for L.T.D. No. 314. The ordinance will be in effect on June 20, 1984. Yours truly, CITY OF UNION p Maxine E. Motor City Clerk bee: Council President Hughes Mayor Shinpoch Councilman Stredicke Public Works Director Houghton City Attorney Marren ^_4 t S - P�ti '1 1 �� VVFp � 39/„Fze//✓ Z 1 � h a "c Q � a yu� i �.��.Fs•�n s:� Is pF RFC A A OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY* RENTON,WASHINOTON may{ (� -I � Z rOT Oenp pa aM •00 !I•a s•4P • 4w,0r, wrs�`p,0., NOff N4NN LAWRENCE 1 WARREN. c+•••+awe• DANIEL KELLOGG. wson.we b+•l�ant• e DAVID M.DEAN, at,W", a+••+•awe• t" MARK E.HARDER. wins+•+++ es+••++aw` V,eo MOO# ZANLTTA L FONTES, wsun•w+ c+••++awe` MARTHA A FRENCH,aNa+,a„+ •m•Wane• June 8, 1984 Mr, Howard Seelig P. 0. Box 1925 Bellevue, WA 98009 Re: LID 314 Dear ftward: Following our recent telephone conversation I checked with the Public Works Department of the City of Renton, at your request. You asked me to determine what "builder benefits" might have been acquired because of LID 314. An answer to your question is difficult, in certain respects, because the City does not have a project before it so that it can deter- mine exactly what requirements would be imposed. However, some of the bene`its can b_ discussed in the abstra t . Of primary benefit to your property is the increase in capacity of the sanitary sewers. Before LID 314 was installed the lift stations for the sanitary sewers were very small and could not accommodate office buildings. When the Boeing Company moved into its cffice complex, the sanitary sewer was operating at capacity. Nn other office buildings or complexes could have been installed on the existing sewer system. Now that the �anitary sewer system has been substa-�ially improved your property and other Valley properties could be developed as office complexes. An additional and substantial benefit involves storm drainage. Thcre is an easement on your property for storm water. This easement was retained by the City when a street was vacated. Although it is not fully established, it is likely that the City will not need that. storm easement. After a peziod of time has passed, it is likely that you will be ab3e to petition the City for release of that storm easement, and increase the usable prcperty area. It is likely that any development on your propert prior to LID 314, would have required you to install sophisticated storm drainage systems from 19th to 23rd. That has largely been acccmplish^d through LID 314. It is .also likely that any Page June 8, 1984 development on your project would have required a sharing in the expenses of projects to mitigate traffic impacts, particLlarly contributions toward a traffic light was installed ae part of LID 314. Further potential benefits may include a lessening of atom retention on your project, as well as potential requirements for participation in other storm drainage improvements off-site of your project. As an example, during times of heavy rain, portions of the roadway in your general vicinity were quite often under water. Any substantial development in the area would possibly require Darticipation in relieving that problem. .lthous.i not the fine, answer, LID 314 certainly has diminished the problem. Furthermore, sinre a drainage problem exists because of the flat, low nature of these properties, a greater than normal storm retention system might be required of any project. The storm drainage improvements of LID 314 undoubtedly lessen the burden for such improvements on all affected property. I hope this information will assist you. If I can be of any further help please -eel free to contact me. Ver -truly urs, ence i. Warren LJW:ds cc Mayor cc: Dick Houghton HARDWICK!CONRAD ATTORNETS AT LAW We FYERGREEN SGR.. C. RENTU44 WASNINOTON NM57 IS6117lJw II)I`June 11, 1984 i CITY CLERK Renton City Council Renton Municipal Buildinu Renton, WA 98055 Rel LID 4314 Assessment Against Hemp Associates Property cn Lind Street Dear Ladies and Gentlemen: On behalf of Hemp Associates, it is respectfully requested that the referenced assessment be reconsidered. We believe tee present assessment is objectionable because the amount of the assessment substantially exceeds any special benefits conferred on the Hemp property. Very ru ly yours,.(-�,(�� 1, and C. Conrad RCClao cci Mr, Jack McCann OF �-,4 1 'UBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT _ DESIGN/UTILITY ENGINEERING 0 2J5 263- P MUNICI►AL WILOINO na MILL AVE.a0. IIENTON,WASH 98055 tfO SEP'EVa",a BARBARA V SNiNF0_-, MAYOA M E MVR A N DU M Dite: June 7, 1984 1 Gloria hinnick From: Don Monaghan Re: L.I.D. 314 Retainage CAG 034-62 The Contractor has provided me with the necessary cash bond to cover the pickup items that he has not yet completed on the referenced project. Therefore, you can proceed to process and release his retainage as I believe you hive all the necessary documentation needed. Thanks! :Jft I 'o 11 L)e k't.Y i PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ` DESIGN/UTILITY ENGINEERING • 235-2631 {� wL ag MUNICIPAL BUILDING 100 eBLl AVe.$0, RINTON.WASH M66 b P r.0 ge vis� BARBARA v SHNPOCH MAYOR June 7. 1964 Cascade Septic Service, Inc. P.O. Box 44010 Tacoma. WA 98444 Attention: Mr. Mark Perry Re: L.I.D. 314 Dear Mark: As we discussed, the attached list represents those items which remain to be completed on the above-referenced pro- ject. In order for your retainage to he released, you will need to provide Me with a cash bond of $10,600.00 which represents 150; of the cost to perform this remaining work. Once all the work has been satisfactorily completed, the money will be returned to you. If you have any questions, please advise. Very truly yours, Oonald G, lbna9han, P.E. Design Engineer :jft AttachBent Inspect and Repair Type 11 CB's Lump Sum E.V. As. STA 25+0 28+00 29+26 41+18 53+52 56+50 60+32 62+50 65+35 Readjust Valve Boxes 6 ea. @ $75.00 ea. E.V. Rd. STA 11+28 31.19 33+84 36+08 37+19 42+72 Readjust H2O Vault E.Y. Rd. STA 29+28 S.M. 34th St. 8 East Valley Road Adjust Valve Boxes 2 ea @ $75.00 E.V. Rd. STA 39+27 Lt. S.W. Corner 16th St. 8 Lind North driveway for "Rainier Disposal" on Maple to be paved. Pave behind Mobil Oil - Emergency Access Road. Seal crack to front of Merlino's. Air test 6 seal, if necessary, following storm lines 35+00 (35+07) (27th) N 12" storm has bad joint, S. 12" storm has bad joint. 73+30 (East Valley Rd.) grade break in crossing. Re-TV sanitary sewer on S.W 16th St. Deliver three monument cases 3 covers to City Shops. *Note MH's south of 34th St, to be checked. OE N4. tM7 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT RICHARD C HOUGN10N • DIRECTOR !R MUNICIPAL BUILDING NO MILL AVE.SO. RENYON.WASH.DOM rFp SE p,kW °'6 ?06 235-2569 BARBARA Y. SMINPOCN MAVOR June 6, 1984 Mr. Paul Smith Pace Industrial Group 16301 N.E. 8th St. F251 Bellevue, MA 98008 Re: L.I.D. No. 314 Dear Mr, Smith: As requested, the size of your parcel has been rev.awed by my staff who still contend that their calculations are correct. They do, how- ever, offer an explanation for the discrepancy between the two calcu- lations. In 1979, Taylor Ave. S.W., just west of and adjacent to your property, was vacated. As is normally the case, half of the right-of-way goes to each of the adjacent property owners. This 30 foot by 488.16 foot Strip, or 14,644.8 square feet, which .You received as part of the vaca- tion, is approximately equal to the difference between our two areas. If, after reviewing your records, you find that you disagree with our findings regarding the vacated right-of-way and can provide us with the supporting documentation, we will adjust your assessment accord- ingly. If we can of any further assistance, please advise. Very truly yours, Richard C. Houghton ' Public Works Director DGM:jft cc: Mayor City Attorney Fit T \Ors - - 1LS 19 01t - J719'R?-13as-N LI 1 1 S pp{{Vf\OMMI S � LN2ayS CO 5�9 y�lO1p 10.111, 4141111pD 113N 1 715.)0 10/IF All 11 T� 7 Sp �L�rCM� H-y'Vll i 1LF11M W 7 ] L015 1 R[ 1 ]]}MO•�1[7yXy(�1-Ja1RFi 1•Qi�a NLt70-f1 CO al$qNlq�a17a14p!AltLl u01 j_l�jJ1 411+ 5 Ij fk*Am 1�7IF evt $I 'LOf �rev vKti' is VYgi;a a. MM 1 O7S � I S17+aD-17eS-(k '''.A-7J-0a It 10 MIS .7y1014 M:.iitb Jpy o )7(IGSa x 1LWAS C 0 .MMO.L, bjV I 1,,VON 1 r rpl WD. It ANT IN IM 14 17 t O7N 40 PAUM W Oa003 7. 1• 1LL Ot 1�OVf OttF It Nt � �(( rW�{{1�yy�� O-.MIa1 l� 44 1 t Ntt Iq I S1y1t Tow'lr! ll Naiie�AT -i�" OfOl�.S•7 I711 7 43 1 10t attlIN11 w t T y sT Mh 1W 3 MJ f i109a l rMau yyqI 1"L ll 5 aSG11 ital It rt 371 xa3W.MaLMM31iMt(M6i0M 6YDf14Eir i 7 TRW 1 1MOu aft, YII 9ww LISS )1 Wt Slr,'6 MMI1M a0J7a'MlLL11M5 lYLI1167M WDtllt it 11 39 .alp) 1 39Y]411 oil ILCOA W WJ09 Tm �rrianr rO 117 1'Ix s Of c i'rA T1 N/p11 XfI TO aIr@S1IOpO,S� pS Far 1 3'Tal[Fit VAC 57 iDI1lOr5 )� h 0111!a NIlLW1pl MLIM TlOM GMo[aO I 1 I 1eD� 1 iltei3Vffa IllSS "IO W OL iy� DgfS q (y p}a 1 .1:7mJI'M u l 1 241ML a.4MoiN5 i 1 11T r 1lYhaa OM fM J3 Nllt M. -7u3 a rWy �a p 1 yy .,,,1 I' 1L 1• 1N .sa[ 11 OIu3pSIIIILIIIaIa tMaIIMCIOa iMaf�ala f N7 T"W aOOf. 1 1� tt5•,e U 111at a SO 111P1I ( 1 s� "Illu_a .,_.__.. 1 .,. _._..,_......._.�r._.. ----•--�1.� �_..i._ _ 34040-0745-OS ...:•,Y.YAS. r..Y F,w1.1w uar �1 .Q� KM •.i iP\ OiYI • Mt \Yri ITT" WMrf 1I»A NNY� ;Y M aMa ATOM liif Syi`IMllat"ANT, iW111S M � 1�Q i'Jad`I 1 .Se� 161'a7�'—...••__ .1 �, eta a t r r+a�lr City "k7 30Ni� tYuwt,y f.NptMS a 1 � 11� k� 1 f,1V jp 1 W055��lr r SS FAS<1 y "SU ter^ la,o-ol �tjj��a� it, 4 1SMrp 11{llAlllws IMILIIKtm WHNf 1 1 aau++? liJi 1 SN fal RIOSOa11 S S1 FAST *TOSS' aSe:a of J aar+, )•,:YI W! S is" 1NMa1t``.Oilaww llK:a umfts i 4 a e`.,7 + t.ea 10301 r,»w 7a0)1114f 314 S.F717-07 y]4`N t _ r111■tO1111 lllf IrAigkIlarm loom S 1 a 111� J� t MI ki OF RAY i S i PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT DESIGN,UT 4ITY ENGINEERING • 2352631 } F MUNICIPAL BUILDING 300 MILL AVE.f0. RENTON,WASH.BBoaa e P ��Fo SFO/L� BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR June b, 1984 Mr. J. E. Morrison 1432 Maple Ave. S.W. Renton, WA 98055 Re; L.I.D. 314 Dear Mr. Morrison: 1 would first like to offer my apologies for the oversight in failing to respond to your lettLr of March 29, 1984. In regard to your concerns about the assessments on L.I.D. 314, 1 would like to offer the following comments for your consideration. Normally in the past when a property owner was a participant in a Local improve- ment District, he could expect to see a physical improvement in front of or on his property. Today, that is not always the case. Many times improvements installed under an I.I.O. are regional in nature and although not directly in front of a parcel provide that parcel with certain benefits. As for L.I.D. 314, some of the regional types of improvements which were installed as part of the L.I.D. were the traffic signal at S.W. 16th St, and Lind Ave. S.W. and extensive improvements to the drainage system. Also, the overall improvement to the road system does benefit a parcel such as your own, although not directly in front of your property. These factors were all taken into account and the assessments were weighted accordingly to be reflective of the specific circumstances. I hone 1 have given you some insight into the rationale of how the assessments were developed. If you wish to discuss the matter fur- ther or if I can be of further assistance on the matter, please advise. Very truly yours, Donald G. Monaghan, P.E. Design Engineer :jft a(4VBiaH 1310 m '---W7V7 ' uo )ai,ow sTyz uo plsg oq of oulassH ollgnd 11 lTouno) of isodas aoa v06vlu0014d szsingsz as-veld •P"U*Jsjss -snogs 11 sllsloAd 4ll^oAo4 p]1waoj 114 _______________ T voilTlsd ao 444401 1144OJd VlE 1 'a'l'9 tad x,sla All.) °KOda (UWONGW Yap) 1u1e1x1tlsa 1xt0!! OlT4nd �l �Y1,y Y 3/ , iSiB♦ ro ' C/ r Y Ole Mf'A/r*A/ C, ry C4rRA•J OFr/Cr 200 MIL( .V✓F Jo-rW Rr"rVN, W 4 .900 S SvHJEV Ot JFcr/oN -o TrvtJFD Fi VAL AJ3lS3 A+rA/r .I eL4 06R LLD 314 ( 1 ~ . ra*Aw NO • Gf) . ReKeoeNCf 4r rrrA OA rep A'Ae.'A' st, /l✓ Jf M. w .• ro Ar"", C.rY etr*K — 3�AIr•r v ro Xawk A"S`33w.rNr 4044 004 tr0 J/{ . C!'AR ros Msr�R, PLEASE IF' AQV/3F0 TAtA�' I NrArAY mA✓!Cr ro ^wY PAep"rY Ar,v& Iu CtaOlO 'Al YWF .43A4r33Arlvr Rrtt Xom a xo 3/¢ Jr A rNF Arott .•.v/w6 RlAJOA/J 1• MY' Pld& rWrY 13 [oCgrFO a" mArte" AOvr JW, ao r CA/ J`v /4 rr JrArrr I . rA'F It A;* /A4 3 A r!A✓ A/A Jr vne 3 I ..n .. W41" Aw.NAi, N,l CVA43 , vo iurlrR3 , AM J/OrwALA3 , A/O AAr4/ JrArr'r coANr3 , NO A/Ft✓ 40,,YrW/N6 ^A/Jrpft44rp ~ ArAP&C AvF JW /A/ AVC v/C/A/iry oe ".V Atoj0rArr. "E44r / rfAw 3 wrAF pe..v rP0 o4r .V ^ y Rrr"~er LrrrF.! 44410 ?We #"LY RrSpVAtJE j RCC4r/Vr0 WAS AAr /A/CAr Aar Or 0/Ors i&, rH! #�ov"r A33r33,rD A44,413► ^wY PAte,Aw wry - r Wff t&D A/PR r C i Arr A LUA,rrF,v R!3/w/Jr ry ?W/3 A rrrR JM P'~0 WAVY AJ34r33M&WP-3 ARF e4rMA6 MA04F WMFA! NO WFtF MA0r M.1 rNF voeowry *or A+Y /camery R rJPrC rsutLy JNAr.rMp, Lor 3a� j1 AtK 1 ! �A � N//QwMNJ JF M.Aft Nr✓ ,ass ~avr ^w Jw frri+roA , mars uo 2a33aa a{43 uo NOY sq 03 Au 'S.M �ltq^d 3r ti"no.) a3 3iodas soi 60693uaa2od diainge3 aaoold 'paauoiojol -anoga ao 0120301d 431wa3a4 p37A203 aM .........................................................----- u01313Ad so sa33a1 3aai0a4 0 1q'111 t2v 420ta Ott :MOY1 3uar32adad dltsoN aitgnd 104, i June 4, 1984 O I� Patricia Ann McIntyre John Powers Frank Powers CITY CLEMa Ib: City Clerk City of Renton Subject: Local Improvement District 314 Request: Reduce Property Assessments We request the Renton City council t; ev qew a.. . to rej4 a Ana assessments on certain property a with!:. t.,. Le as rmpr,ve• went District 314 ( LID 314) . 4he lets I, qusetion are Lota 16-25, Block 22; Lots 34-40 Block 22; and Millman* earlington gardens Division el (Less the Stste Freeway Prop- erties) , Sheae lots were included in the LID 314 for asseaaswnts but their single access road, Maple Avenue S.W., received no Improvements. Our queetton to the city Council is why are we being billed for benefits not recei%,d. We wore under the impression that an LID was a means to obtain local street and utility improvements in a concerted sff.rt With all the work completed in a uniform manner at one time. As stated before, Maple Avenue S.W. received no improvement when the LID was under construction. At Nome time in the future, each property owner on Maple Avenue S.W. will install sanitary and storm sewers, underground electrical service, side walks and curbs, and paved streets. It will be a mixed bag of construction as each property owner will be responsible for the controctiing and funding of the Improvements. An LID presented itself as the best way out of this Impending hodge-podes but the owners on Maple Avenue S.W. were left out of the plan. Maple Avenue S.W. is in the Name state as it was before the LI➢ wean begun, however the property owners are Assessed thm same S.23 per square foot as those property owners on S.W. 16th street. S.M. 16th street has curbs, sidewalks, underground electrical wiring, etc. because of LID 314. This situation is very unfair. We are certain the Banton city Council sitting as the Board of Squaliastion Will see the insqultie* of the situation and make the proper adjustments in property assessment* to reflect the lack of improvements on Maple Avenue S.W. 1 Patricia Ann McIntyre John Powers PIA • • Ao� �4oN/IC,�lfAl✓ TOs public works Department p ROMs City Clerk RXI L.I.D, a 114 Protest Letter or Pot it too Si-ohan Limited Partnership (Itd) .............................................................. We forward herewith protests as above- referaneed. Pletea tabulate parcentageR for report to Council at Public Maarina to he held on this Matter on AIIIIea aww 8, MA �a.l.iou lw.ic.ilal C�il�iliy luWlt:i1 QSWI,LC+ UUr4C I::ri1a. iiOtAC, :t,w luttot is tr Uuull ;Yxt that we w,,AAO, 12,C4 W, I.tt,itt>v W.a'u ecuitlt> tLlxhl. 141it 'w101ts" SOL.a 1L11W., ;A,# UM i o0wtiwy W tI* ilYi.CLti,MAU inr Luottl U*r C kL L"triot 1316. Otu !'CQWty in (,WaLia. in huts. 421-15 L1k. 021, ❑J11*A a t:trlir*kfW' VAIAti & y1, Wl. Low 026-27 Llk, t21, 11illwww txi:114toll tySixkku" al. 11uaw lxeMIS UL4 Itt,Lau ui Iutico of N+ilio UNA41 y La 475 arts, #76. a4UO W tlw iK tOIVA"kt, lilktaad ill ll.: 1.IL t314, wtu t W 14%litiOi U#.X u,3t +l EL, Lul a nu wt ua LI, UC uLuvt:. l.,rulCrq. 3 1/2 trwk. "A+ V, w t .xl lttw %4Wrt th ru ott W t" Iw..t W �.. l ati lt1w,.A i i�liticL. I k40V o. L.I, .., .. ... 1 .�, 1 ,. , .. . ..L;,. . It tom.•.. (Ll ','L.'r •.�•. •". .... LL;t.:4tk'+ :r.t �.,1 L...��{Llaf LG W IIIL . ,,.. lt:♦ ,L,bt emu,:,t�.u..L 10G ill WLI LLuli tAa ,, 3i,a�x„ Ltt. y Wlilr..l t4LU..c I '�. U qTY CLFNK �•/ T, Public Works Depattsen6 ( MOA �IMR) PROW[ City Clerk RP[ L.I.D. a 1,1,1_ Protest Letter or Petition Pstr!'L Peter►Ir'r� W forward herewith protests as above_ referenced. Pleas* tabular• percantage for report to Council at Public We►rinqa to be held on this Batter on 2�0 2s Tucson. Az. is,41ib C,+y C1uk o) 'Renton Rem-ron , WFi. 9'tos-+ I wl%h to hw,ka known my o-�cc+ions to ti+e pc�eyrnenie QiUltd on rnIP3roP4-"+y - loss 34-]Sgl( 11 and Le,►s 16- Fs %IV 1a on H�PIe a `Y�u+ 1+s 1�ue �loaanlla� and +-Iu no Let6W� u, ,f, +he P.�j4,+ t�c.� Gbso Ly , ue n�o ut b.aan.zc� c)c on rnalole. 1 ,.�ou1J Ica +W kw u wvv,+ W 44a laasis o) asse-Wherlt' oo� �� ►�p,,x no ur.�anc Uetr.ertR� bun rr�d� 1 Ti�o.nk�ov, CITY CIEHK ti'Fo Public Works DePartment (Don Monanh4n) FROM, City Clark Ric L.I.D. 4 314 Protest Letter or Petition Garfield Associates -._ -------"--------------- ..__--._---..- We forward herewith protests as •bove- referenced. Please tabulate percentages for report to rouncll at Public Hearinq to be held on this matter on June 6. 1984 . cc: Dick Hounhton ' R GARFIELD ASSOCIITSS, LTD. P.O. Box 800 Renton, Washington 98 Uf2 fl NAY May 24, 1984 _J u CITY CLERK Renton City Council Renton Municipal Building Renton. WA 90055 Attentiont Maxine Motor. City Clerk Dear Me. Motor: Rat Protest to Final Assessment - IL 31L - Garfield Associates Enclosed will be found original and five copies i Garfi,• .1 Associates' Protest to the above named final assessment. Will you please place the orlgAnal on file and distribute the copies to the members of the Council so that they may have them before them at the hearing scheduled for Tune 4. Please also advise the Council that Garfield will appear at the hearing and request that its assessment be deleted or in the alternative its assessment be drastically reduced. Failure of the City Counell to provide proteot.ant appropriate relief may force it. to challenge the asabastent method in the courts. Yours truly, j� J aep ne Frandsen General Partner WLT%jg Fncle. - Orig. e 5 Protest Oct Me. Shinpoch, Mayor BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL CITY OF RENTON NOTICE OF PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT, ) LID 314 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL ) NOTICE OF PROTEST AND HEARING THEREON ) OF GARFIELD ASSOCIATES ) Barfield Associates, 200 S.W. 34th St., Renton, Washington 98055. owners of Lots 4 and 9, Block 1, Burlington Northern Orillin Industrial Park, Renton N1, protests the Revised Final Asses-vent against the aforesaid property in the amounts of $64.432.61 for Lot 4 and $63.610.07 for Lot 9. on the following grounds: 1. ,F? .}ura to e Notice of Hearings on rrou4se�Tmnrovomants Although Garfield Associates have been the legal owners of the aforementioned property since 1979. no notice of hearing was given on LID 314 until the receipt of Notice of Revised Assessmant Roil and Hearing Thereon dated June 14. 1982 (received May 29, 1982). Thus the taxpayer was deprived of due process of law and equal protection of law by failure to give it an opportunity to appear and oppose said project at City Council hearings held on November 10, 1979 and January 7. 1980. 2. tRotlog Without Garfield is informed and believes that, subsequent to the December 10. 1979, public hearing, the than public -1. works director met with certain protesting property owners located on the east side of the East Valley Highway and arr- anged to change the method of assessment so as to reduce the amount of their assessments and thereby throw the greater, share of the cost on the property owners lying west of East Valley Highway, all without notice of publi, hearing. As a result of that procedure, protests to the project were either withdrawn or not filed so as to persuade the City Council that the project should be approved at its January 7, 1980 public hearing. Garfield is informed and believes that subsequent to the June 14, 1982 public hearing on the estimated revised assessment, city officials again decided to change the method of assessment so as to reduce the amourt of assessments to property owners located on the east side of the East Valley Highway and thereby throw an additional greater share of the cost on the property owners lying west of the East Valley Highway, all without notice or public hearing. This second change of assessment ratios was made tc ameliorate protests of the ea.it side property owners at t.!:.- expense and detriment of the west aide property owners. 3. MID a A60666mont t; The above discribed changes in the method of assess- ment were arbitrarily and capriciously determined and not made an the basis of benefit, but rather as a part of an effort to .2 relieve protests, thereby illegally imposing an unfair share of the cost of the project onto Garfield and certain others. In addition the present method of assessing is inequitable, arbitrary and unlawful, in that It imposes a grossly disproportionate arount of the cost of the improvement on Garfield as compared t other properties that cleat .y benefit as much or more from said improvements. The City's appraisal on which the change in assessment was predicated assumes a fallacious increase in value to protestant's pro- perty by reason of LID 314 improvements. Protestant's pro- perty already had ttie improvements being furnished by LID 314 by reason of improvements to Lind Avenue, S.W. 34th Street, S.W. 41st Street, , nd S.W. Ord Streets i.e., sewer, water, gutters, curbs, sicewalks, catch basins, lighting, etc. It should not now be re, uired to pay for improvements that only benefit others. Yet its assessment was increased more than 60% while property fronting on the improvements which gained the benefits had their assessments reduced. At th< same time, property lying immediately adjacent to Garfield of the approximate same size (benefiting no more or less than Garfield from this LID) is assessed substantially less than Garfield. 4. Prayer for Relief Protestant Garfield requests that its assessment be -3- deleted or stricken and its property reassessed on the basis of its true benefit (if any) to be derived fro■ said LID. Dated May 24. 1984. GARFIELD ASSOCIATES, LTD. Protestant �]t ' rand en� epa.ine '/y�'- +Z et1,4 Frandsen General Partn.urs -4- vxm rwRt CITY CLERK'S OPfICR DATE:t, i a � MEAD e� •` --- THANK YOU, *10 kwthswsl 541h 5ueet•Renton.Washington 9"S•Ieirp w w I1Q61151-SODS Mar 30, 198a I� O nAl U C,IIY CLERK The Honorable Barbara Shinpoch Mayor - City of Renton 200 Kill Avenue South Renton. WA 98055 RE: Objection to Proposed Assessment LID 314 Dear Mayor Shtnpoeh: Superior Fast Freight receiveo its third Notice of Public Hearing on LID 314 on May 14, 1984, at our Los Angeles offices. That not-ification was forwarded to our regional office in Renton making note thAt our assessment had been reduced. Superior has objected to Its being assessed for LID 314 since the 1982 public hearing and most resubmit for your consideration the following facts which we believe clearly indicate t .at our company receives little, if any, benefit from the LID as outlined. Prior to the first hearing in 1981, the offices of the Engineer and Clerk, City of Renton, were visited by a representative of out company. He we advivvd that approximately fifteen feet of Superior's eastern property line fell within the 600 foot assessment rights of the city. Considering such a small portion of our property falls within the assessable area, it is hard to rationalize, let alone visualize, what benefits we would gain as a result of this LID since fifteen feet on the east portion of our property line only encompasses our fence line and landscaped property border. improvements identical to those required by LID 314 were completed on our property At the time of initial construction as a requirement for issuance of our Certificate of Occupancy. Following Semna b+eaon. Aashmpen. Idaho. Aims&a. "ar n Cuuda irr� Southern Cawornw and Ancona tasebwnd iene.Ce R Teas uon Southern 6htorrs4 The Honorable Barbara Shinpoch May 30. 1984 Page Two is a list of the improvements required and completed, costa incurred, and the coat of LIU'a (I.e. 302) that were asseseed against us. A. Assessment of $121,904.69 under LID 302 for Improvement of Southwest 34th, South 41rt and land Avenue. This assessment covered the salts basic improvements As re- quired by LID 314, except Lind In the primary arterial route used by our company. B, :later main and fire hydrants -- Installed at a cost of $Ll 978.66. A latecoae� 'a agreement was approved; however, quoerlor has only regained a small portion of that installation coat. C. Curbs, gutters and sidewalks -- As identified below: I. City sidewalk, curbs, and gutters were installed on Southwest 34th, including asphalt paving at railroad tracks and installation of a drainage catch basin ($3,564.00). 2, City sidewalk, curbs and qutters were installed on Southwest 29th, the northern border of Superior's property - ($3,063.00). D. Catch basins with pumps -- Two catch basin% were required as a part of initial construction to retain all run-off from industrial wash products used on our equipment. (Cost - initial construction cast cannot be segregated). f., Oil aoparator tank -- Baffled holding tank required at the maintenance shop to collect any oils or debris from our steam cleaning area. This tank to cleaned semi-annually to comply with Metro Industrial Haste discharge limitations, (Cost - $3,111,00). P. Sanitary sewers -- All sewers and store drains were Installed conforming to .-iill requirements set forth by Washington Standard Specifications as approved by the City of Benton. The Nonarable Barbara Shinpoch May 10, 1984 Page Three As one of the first companies to recognise th_ potential of the vallev area, Superior Fast Freight, as well as others, he" bore the cost of met of the initial improvements in our site. To date, these foregoing assessments have been paid withupt protest, realising that for our industrial community to grow, we must bear some responsibility it the costa of Improvements; however, the line =at be drawn somewhere. Perhaps there web some justification for improving Southwest thth Street to Lind Avenue; however, its impact on our business 1s highly questionable since Lind Avenue and Southwest 180th have been our main traffic routes for years based on dispatch routing to the majority of our customers. It is our request that our assessment be dropped or at a minimum reevaluated downward again, based on our distance from the improved road network, its lack of beneficial impact as an access route to our company, and the amount of funds we have already expended for site and area improvement in the valley, Sincerely, SUPERIOR F I FREI1: T /J1 � s1 French Co Yr ate S* ft fMnai;er TRF:pg cc: S. 0. Knopp D. L. Castro R. E. Potter J. E. Carl MEMO FROM.- CITY CLERVI O"ICE TO: � . . . DATE RE. .c am( t✓� .^.._ 1, OIL).637 a J8,U Las Yalhy ti hmur Swth►grnl,w,Wadumpua M0:+5 a 751 MI W RECEIVED May 29, 1964 ' M�� 3 1 Wn pi a 04 IN Renton t:Ity Coun..11 Renton City Mall Kenton, WAshin►ton 96055 Uear Council Member►t Dated April 9, 1984, 1 received notice at Iln,Il acaeaament roll for L.I.D. 0314. The total figure shown was $b,969,111.60. Two pieces of properly in my name are t62 and #63, with a combined assessment of $20,472.66. this amount was high enough but 1 would µo along with it rather than protest. Now comes a revi%P4 final avvesemcnt tar hearing on June 4, 1984. The raviaed total to now $7,P56,579.40, un increase of $0.466.30, equaling a 1.r hike. My asavameenta were increased $6327.21, equaling a 111 hike. ouch a pvrcer � r tnaroase is disproportionate trt rviatton to the total a..se.ament figure. 1 protvst my JI'. increase on the basis that the total L.I.D. amount only in..reased 1.M Sin nty, Stun Yo h� r/ti/i9/ {lltai/ 1WWR%IW 171E 1'It2CT S44\11 Law 1 Htt f 1.10 TO Public Works Department a44� FROM, City Clark Rat L.I.D. a 314 Protest Letter or Petition Mobil oil Corp -------------------------------------------------------------- we forward herewith protests as above- referenced. Please tabulate percentages for report to Council •t Public Hearing - to be held on this natter on 6/4/84 �c: Dick Houghton Mobil Oil Corporation ••� �• May 31, 1984 r a 5' City of Rentonm Renton City Clark, Bldg. Rattan City c tx, UU Mmxne E. Motor Ream. Washington 98055 CSty CLERK LID 314 REVISED FL\AL ASS S24Wr ROLL REMM IE2eM;AL Dow C mail: Mobil Oil Corporatim, herewith files a written objection to the $254,009.26, assessment iwatnst the subject terminal property, recaivsd in the Dallas Property Tax Division on May 14. 1984, In 1983 the same LID 314 assessment as shown on our records was $222,300.00 in subject teminal property and no isprovmmts have been made since that assessment. We believe this new assessment is disproportionately high considering the assessment zvaimt other similar Use Properties in the i+miediate area of subject :md apart of the LID 314, considering the benefits subject property receives fray the roadway improvements, water main, fire hydrants, and street lighting installed tender LID 314. Sincerely, TefmLnalaMw tger /QC . (ed.G[�11�riG` R. E. Weakland, Real Estate Represenrar.ivr REW:tma cc. T. G. Hamm C. F. Linda B. R. Fox C. E. ` miw OIYMPIC PIPE IINE COMPANY n•,.iao•.l tW hip 1, �Ima al4rOM1 �llw v,OrOb lNll CITY CLERK Jume 4, 1"& Me. Maxine F. Motor, City Clerk City of Reucon Renton Municipal building Renton, Washington 98055 Re: ■ is Pi Line Cof! e *n - Objections to Revised Final A&&easment Roll [or LID- 14 Dear Me. Motor: On April 9, 1984, Olympic Pipe Line Company submitted a fowl objection to OUT Sues invent under the Final Assessment Roll for LID 314. Our letter of obl.•ctioa detailed a history of the LID's development and stated specific objections to the handling of the LID and assessment techniques. We have now received a new assessment notice based upon the Revised Final Assessment Roll for LID 314, which indicates our costs have increased by 612 from the 1982 estimated assessment, while the project coats have Increased by only 132. This current assessment is lower than that presented in April of 1984, but our increase from 1982 Indicates that the tone-and-termiuli methodology used to initiate the project in 1982 is not being employed in the final +esesesent. It Is our understanding that the City has adopted a fourth method for calcula- ting aasessasnta within this District. Property east of Fist Valley Road to being &&seemed at a lower level than property located to the west, based upon a partial appraisal of property within the District. All other property .e being &&*eased on a square footage buts within a 600-foot r..ridor divided Into two 300-foot zones, with the 300 feet adjacent to an '•proved street assessed at a higher level. This last assessment technique is more equitable than that used In April of 1984, but does not assess all property equally and In accordance with the special benefits gained. This technique is also at variance with the technique need In 1982. prior to the r1ty ordering the work to proceed. Olympic must, therefore, reiterate its objection to the final assessment roll for LID 314. Our objections are am follows: 1. The final assessment roll and the entire procedure utilized by the City with respect to LID 314 has been founded on a fundamentally wrong basis. Me. Maxine L. Motor June 4, 1984 Page Two 2. The final aaaesswnt of our property does not reflect the act aal special benefits gained by our property frog the entire LID improvements. 3. The final amseeament of our property dues not represent a oroporzfocate share of the total LID aacesewnts. The City ham shifted its asseement approach foe the fourth time with respect to this LID. This change is unfounded end improper in that: 1. It wane that property owners have been staled by the entire prelisinary, assessment process. Had the preliminary assessment roll been advanced on the bads of this method of asseesment, there say have been sufficient pmteata to divest the City of jurisdiction to proceed with the LID. 2. The concept that the City can initiate an LID on the basis of a prelimin- ary assessment roll that utilises one method of a seswent for the LID, order the work, and when the work has been completed, cosplately change the entire smoesswnt wthod of the LID, is fundemmatelly incorrect and isproper. 3. The current assessment method means that our property will bear far mere then its proportionate share of the total assessments for the District. The changes in assessment techniques 'our times, the use of s limited zone concept for assessments, and the use of an incowplete appraisal technique for differentiating between properties east and wet of East Valley Road, is fundamentally erroneous. In summary, we object to the City changing the entire assessment eethod utilized for this LID for the fourth time. In doing no, the City is funda- sentally wrong, and the result is a total subversion of the preliminary essesawnt proceee. The final assessment roll does not reflect the special benefits received by out property from the LID improvements, nor does the final assessment of our property constitute a proportionate share of the total LID assessments. The discarding of the original zone-and-terminil assesmnt method where •tree; lapruvewnts are involved, and at the final stage after usi— it for the preliminary assesawnt roll, is clearly misleading, tnconals- tent tad improper, and does not reflect any attempt to asses@ our property in acco—e- a with the special benefits obtained from the LID leprovewate. Very truly yours, R. C. Meadows Vise President/Manager RCM:dc IOCORRjl 060484 No. 31 MILESTONES Initial Resolution No. 2285 7/ 2/79 Second Resolution 2299 9/24/79 First Public Hearing 10/ 1509 Second Public Hearing ii /5/79 Ordinance No. 3396 1/21180 Amount of Preliminary Assessment Roll $6,236,558.56 Start of Construction 7/ 6/82 Completion of Construction 2/ 7/84 Acceptance of Project 2/27/84 Final Public Hearing 4/ 9/84 Amount of Final Assessment 4/ 19/84 56,969, 113.60 Amount of Revised Final Assessment 6/4/84 $7.056,579.90 FINAL CO_LI Consultant Fees S 508.613.00 Inspection, Engineering, Test Labs d RISC . S 262,520. t0 rinence Costs S 16,510.00 Interim Financing $ 868,524.57 Bond Discount and Registration S 290,889.40 City Clerk $ 1 ,391 .20 Utility Division $ 3,876.59 Right of Way S 510,609.66 Attorney's Fees S 11 .495.30 CONSTRUCTION COST $4,282. 150.08 TOTAL COST TO I.I .D. $7 ,056,579.90 L10 33a VeMel Vrelimtnery Ftnel Revised Assessment Assessment Final Atseessment 1 13,456,95 10.276.11 10,938.09 2 35,510.03 22,5127.05 24.214.05 3 28,806.67 "18,105.10 19,304.66 ' 4 25.199.75 16,166.82 17,193.05 5 19,046.57 12,184.65 13,174.01 6 81801.60 5,633 38 6,091.72 7 748.721.00 886,523.34 928,843.90 8 37,289.69 34,588.07 41,369.73 9 6,9$4.46 4.743.67 5,631.59 10 24.355.85 22,495.15 18,591.1$ 11 881229.99 114,916.41 229.496.28 12 103,700.46 135,066,16 267,386.04 13 104,664,21 I28098.13 127,887.89 14 96,895.29 106,515.84 124,726.62 15 132.452.35 134,333.52 164,964.18 16 46,145.74 43.544.42 17,547.60 17 $5.489.70 ____. 57,210.54 22,414,58 Parcel a Preliminary Assessment Final Assessment 4evisea r+nal 18 Assessment 19 --- 561,830,99 _ 630,357.23 20 653,352.99 222,297.33 21 240-814.25 254-009.26 134,320.3922 �- 154,506.88 152,504.16 138.802.26 158,5?3.99 23 156,489.17 _ 128.640.58 119,600.94 24 1—�--- 152,947.81 84,634.20 _ 78,325.69 102,532,78 27,198.31 26 25,170.83 32,950.04 " 112,792,50 -- 104,384.90 — 27 136,645.76 38.582.37.__ __—__._._ 98.441.17 ? 64,432.61 4,950.20 12,630.20 29 8,266,83 —_ 4.360.38 11,125.33 30 7,281.84 —38-089,83 ----- 97,184.57 63.610.07 31 ---- _ _ 89,444.35 31 �— _-- 106,324.42 102,640.09 86,718.33 -- 99,369.12 33 98,087.65 84,510,97 96,839,71 34 95.073.53 81-835-56 86.835.92 35 1pg,517.1) 183,011.36 213,559.86 211,378 27 Preliminary Final Revised Final Parcel r Assessment Assessment Assessment 36 83,662,00 97,627.18 %,180.74 37 48,626,39 56,745.80 691008.85 38 1,287.64 3.285.33 2,150.34 39 1,400.60 3,574.08 2,339.34 40 2.992.42 7,635.03 4.997.34 --- 41 15.075.67 38,454.94 25,176.40 42 324,799.57 372.182.43 367.382.73 43 179,503.81 457,996.26 368,058.25 44 45 46 218,018.76 ----- 87,424 A0 101,714,04 47 36,423.49 12.154.22 14.852.93 _— 48 44,940.95 15.552.83 18,112.06 49 35,634.60 14.368.67 15,229.0E 50 13.087.45 —. 3,167.82 _--4,146.86 51 37,127.51 13,678.76 �14,638,86 52 118,292.71��- -.___.� 44,600.89 46,249.04 53 68,488,52 27.899.90 26.003.20 Preliminary Final Revised Final Parcel a Assessment Assessment Assessment 54 13.241.41 3,512.78 4.598.43 55 81,950,59 31,526.50 31,825.72 56 113.814.14 43,286.23 44.367.71 57 45,172.04 16.866.61 17.730.39 58 96,625.10 35.015.74 36,325.03 59 38,456.86 12.825.12 15,479,80 6U 36,527,00 12,362.59 14,826.87 61 39,641.04 13,354.36 16,318.42 62 40,167.58 12,426.46 16,206.94 63 30,994.35 8,046.20 10,532.93 ` 64 6.503.14 6,682.93 7.605.39 65 4,287.10 3,911.99 4,857.26 66 9.134.98 $1601.36 9,590.36 67 280,939.51 304,341.92 322,875.75 68 179.492.77 ?01,788.21 204,180.27 69 70 71 Preliminary Final Revised Final Parcel a Assessment Assessment Assessment 72 73 1,156.49 963.58 643.78 74 1,536.47 1,306.75 $55.31 75 3,139.05 2,669.72 2,980.36 76 3.139.05 2,669.72 2,980.36 71 7,517.19 6,393.26 6,279,73 78 1,672.77 1,422.68 931 .18 79 —Y_ 3.221.65 2.739.97 3,586.77 80 `——--- 3.221.65 2.739.97 3.138.43 81 — 2,00.02 2.534.47 1.658,88 82 39.249.05 80,551.95 60,000.79 83� 5,976.61 12.272.47 13,831.80 84 43.999.11 90.303.04 67,264.10 85 15.147.96 38.649.36 25.297,11 86 6,362.76 16.234,31 10,625.82 87 20.148.75 51.406.66 33.648.43 88 — 5.885.71 15,017.13 91829.14 89 101,605,94 259,243.16 1911617.48 Preliminary Final Revised Final Partclr Assessment Assessment Assessment 90 91.445,34 233,318.95 179,614.63 91 33,868.65 86,414.39 60,181.94 �2 1.610.82 4,109.96 982.91 1 r w I � ^ 1 1 ......Z 1 . • N 1 ^ 1 • - - 1 Y N tll N• Y• •! N'� Y w J Y. N� Yh 11 t!'' Ie y vy ,vs I �G�wr� . /oGr a�.•TG �Stlsttd � + ew. e i a�./ /�R,•rc a / 3o J COD loloI&F .Jti`G�IAK� IPA-wa/�A:lr�y7pf7 ;�n� l D 3 L lass dr a.:r -0;�r 4/,4 I' — -- etwoomel ,..,. IM UMW lM sit 7M -it kKii of I at 1 U11111 w NIM 1751T•NM-M ,NIS 1 W.H l S t11 S r flM M!a\l• H1lUMI 7.•.0 t N MISt U07 ❑ IN n NHM I1 I r I 1!1 Met�Iw.11 N IMSt NN•I ttt t M• I 1R71Y1-Mt��+N1 ones 711"11:11 IMM tN IN a"SMIS 0 wittla to Pe NR I/ 11uht w 41 M 11S110-44H•0' 1 M•.H! 11 I11 15 1}NI I 1M tWs M 4•a Mt0N MO 10 . ifN v!t1• to N NP" It 0 tl �01I 6,01M 11 U•r ISI w N1M ;tNicOtt IIUNt� U so 5751w4wly I}t7tr 77 1 1 0 Ht I Cp It NIY ~4 0 0", S-IfMV^ N NI". IN N \1\,N I1 IN•Ir I1,011 kM I1'MS``,, '•' (Ire N NN,M N NItt MM Y• RMII11p/4)y1 of Y I7tN71N/7 SN it 63.l14t MI 1 10 SW laity-N1 0-11 1 1 Ma.H1 11 tit Im N I .I1 W V 4•t ltt Iw <0 IS70M!W4 \Nitt�. 1M .• •!\tN rl IN cINtN4 We, 110 NI .I 11 a1 r(1 w q1M 175S00-M•0-aI a I IMHI 1 t to I'll 1 a wNiNt •51M aril trt RU70"k \0•ltl l• Iw •• •t\reN t1 I 7• 7N1N 73eM It MI 100 N\1M Y1 1N11 ' MN-NS0 0. 6 1 la,rOf 0111 t11 7•S1 1 t{ I410I1•(•UN Nltl• IOIMIIINO . wit,I• Ir I• •Hlb I� 7N 7.«I+1 71M07 N M• I/tM to .at ~01 (1 NUN 1111MroM1.07 I} 1 IN.t01 a I 711 it" 1 SS7 Was" loom, t :\1N Iq!MSNI•MhW 1M rt qn0\ n •51 t0/IN IWN b Ili INNR t0 t 1 q1 Sly It •S Mn ON 15. Maw•N to NOSE eft" N11MroNerot '1 1 16a.101 051 pit it 1 IN QNI•USIN Niter IOt0S7.fAl N N1uN INN I(N101v 1 Ntf 1. Q .Nit o to%MM01111t(A on" 121lu-0010ro0 1 IN.I 1 1If to PO MOM 1 101 tal, "It'd,t IMl4tts Jt JIt "t. N 0114.t• L4 I. .,NIM�1 N N1 in No,"W 0M1t t IHl10•MMroa 10 I IN.H� I t all ll,tH M I its 47Mt t(NSOrNM IMI 7 11•aiNtt \OH,SP IN H gRtM 0pNt0 N! Nt ftN+Hl M06 I t/111U we 1M1 0-07 �'.1r Ma.70f 1tf1r 111 lots, ON 7t��N t 1M M501� fM•On I CI N I } INN 0 ON Yl II • . 4 t, ... ...... ......, �.. •�1YR uo .mom ��r rnv 0110 t No VOW Iwo, \ "I,,li-lN V. N I�Mw ttoli 110 f11 ••fSt+M N• tt 1M1ro117oro1 ro 1 M•,111 a5 : r I, •:15 ...r• •r1 11WI IINItN Mt4110 Nt •'eftOM Iatt I Wt,l. M N NNIN It eft, wo 44q1; 1 lIMSM•0► " ts•.r01 �si l,�int� s Mttt! ' »I tea551 1!t IW to 070114.F.+t N MI.,14 lie f% 4NfoR 0 t tUN4 MN Ila of W 1h! w NIMI � i I Sp•O+aO-M '7 O;S.Hf �1;r Mttt.• l ltlt+.ar. W t tt1>� M15e, It INN to Zito" �Oulla N M OR NN ON M (/NttN tilt 610 Mt NI r /MolI(YIIY \f01h a Ptt,1. lr fa tly+P II (K1\i Waa I r uI twat• ! s.. , .4, aA Vol. Y• w Y19 ( w `ppr tI ko1 as I .> VADU •rRy Al;aIyll iA-0 p Moo.t IW., av;z "do k% t ote0 a Pitt• 10 w aala 91 9 a r 41M %I y 911)(hY Ipq 0 :n 1 l tr so Y W ooI 7 la 1 tp L� ' a4Vo-tlOO-P 1 P.I r• r I!1 7/R !t{I �N , i a•Y <04 f-lIm a Alt,1• IM1 w M"IN of i al,ll w 9/Aa i 4..kill Wa �0 j 17M t y PF,I. Iv w we Oi1�� + 1•' •.6� .`tP aM :�Ivll a r Searlaa mom S!•1 tl 11• ' "IN ! 2t4o-0990.p I PI 1 I v. I VI , I y ta!'M-(btlq ..• •0.Y 51 t y PI\t Ili I• Mr!lyra. Jt fq q N la )+1 A40�1010-W I 09.11 v ! Vi tw W!o.f , :.oleo a MOO: :h Sea+P II 17i 1µ0 ,y,tx• IM(IMYIyIYIVun Y IOE Mr I1 !1 .S■•S P it, . luylt•W YIIe I jaf000Ip.0e P.ti'• Ito +I�a , 1 wUM�(•SyIUOlip IN 0,Pll(• !Oje St 1 %Alt't• 10^• aF M!P II :,pC .+u i' .•,ill 16M Ywtff I• 9fq•D Is*(it .0 ,•17A t %will'• In I.. .tnlm 1 1?47 1 t,l j!;00 3+.p I '. y,•1 . • It%Ilk •Dill 1 St.rryf w wIa jtbDb101-QM1 0 1 ti4 7 t jfl o;•.y , a •- Q 9(yll IYIY .lYW QAII ! a MItil1 IV W alaroa a\ 65 Ky m In 1091J AW-PIIo-tlt I , ri,l!. 11 j,.;� I + ?• I , {51 " a9"a vmWr 0", 1 N IY; ,I• ;NI' .r aA V!lW It y w ar 19oIr ttrl-:,'J�IC Il g9.l,a / r ]lV 1 t. ww9.a•r..rraar ----r r11W,r r A( (0 1-A a 1\l • 111p Y 9tR(W 1 w wMT— ,w r ,W,a a•w air f(IwMa Rp. A•,u w 9ela f WE MN (n t-4ri 1 1 a All'I. lao n 9f a'hN II fa•1n •99 U104 j xr 1e.5+� wit 5-ld» a Oil.1• twl W ya1Pp11Y^ Y 11 150.01 1 2 39.11a 1 I1 . 0 3 ✓. :v 50 Y ".rhL.ek '9 DY 9 /Z / 4.4 J/ u/ Lo B 4 35,3 A. 7z 91/ uU c9 iz3 py928 SNS ;9 ��.Z.1Ast q /y4 9 11. s 3 /G 1r M.4..7r1L:� f,2 J t L4•GL Me�ZrI *As: 3Z. 31 3 4 94y. I SM.* `S Yd 7u LL Yry.''i 9f PO G C.. 54 53 352 1.o M.l;10;1 Ld7 91 yo / ,as 15 a 49.Z4 PsP G 7 Ilk.1 2100. .'w G N1 71 So / U /J4 5.7 Q.IW i G 'Jo, 4 0a. I It.atH S7.Le120 410 Z a P t Mid o. JA /I , 125, 33 / Vd.0 3 3� S P r 4 09,7 s� a4,Aj St. s, ioE N __fAJLajlJG f490 got,is TY + 3 5 .4150. 3 J li n 2 �31,p 1 yt 3 1Y ?9159Ida"o Mir 3 /9 5 P v c S / _ / 4P �9 Yo. / o 3/ •IIw� D91 9 / 76 L iolkgpg I N Lap 2 � I )6 M .7 K.h 3 + J ss,9s sG / u y . / L,od/ 7 S", U-1,16 Akef. n 27 Vo /Vo jl(.A2 L; /. / 11 AV 2 3 s 4s Y1 7 /0 / 79 •I M LL t 1Y G .3G Y S7o.3v / 7" 'FJ 9- 304 3VI.9 i S2-2 ?75. 75 LY wA- 9 Ylt ,79 zo 7 L.. �Z L 1G.y y 3.Sd .� l /1JG . y7 / 3 4.2> J s 72 L lko,jv _ ��• 3/3 L LL Q J b ;ayfe.- IG72 .99YJr ` MCI- +e 3L2/. LS 2,939 97 r 739. siy v7z 6,5p 71 kz 7-.1 R,+ 3 tM O SS/ Sf Op 0 4T lr 9) ---L4,kLL,Y r s to . o y • l: 59 . / G po3 , rU / S a7.. 4 342.7 / S �. 3/ • /o 5. S ./ u'/ yr S SY 1r ' S 1 < C ..� Pi r 4 a7wK ii 9. 96 +1 CITE OF RENTON City Clerk's Office 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA MOSS lNt� e o • Ut�l�v,rt4, 01 vnAi ilpei ine (,n, 612 S<w n Flimr� St reNN• ln,. An, r., (:. 90017 :1 WCOM . o mm PACE INDUSTRIAL GROUP 16101 northeast Bib, 4251 Bellevue, Washington 98008 March 5, 1S J4 Mr. Richard C. Houghton Public Works Director Municipal Building Renton, W A 98055 Re: LID 31.4 6 Pace Industrial Group 016 S 017 A-Economy Storage Facility 2233 East valley Road Dear Mr. Houghtun: I visited with Don Maninan Friday and learned that the assessment on .,ur facility was not reduced. It is still over $100,000 at $100.754.96 for $16 and 017. 1 asked Don what the assessment is on Johnothan's Storage (approximately one mile south of us on East valley Road) slid he gave me the figure of $35,015.74. A comparison shows: Johnathan has 4.5 acres or 198,020 sq. ft. of land: Assessment $35,015.74 = .1786 Land Area 196,020 S.F. A-Economy has 4.1 acres or 178,596 sq. ft.: Assessment .$10000+�7-5-4�.96 = .5642 Land Area I also spoke to Larry Warren and on his suggestion I am writing this letter to ask you to provide me with information on how the city calculated the assessment on my parcel and on the Johnathan parcel. Please include information on land appraisals, cost of the 1,11) improvements, calculation method and rationale on how our facility would be benefited three times as much as the Johnathan facility or law we are benefited three times more the , other small land owners either to the north of us or to the south of us. We are an operating business which 's owned by people with average means. We o-e not a large land owner or land deveb,,per who is going to benefit enor- mously from this street improvement. We are certainly not going to benefit one cent mor^ than Johnathan our competitor to the south, or to other small existing businesses on East Valley Road. Mr. Richard C. tiought)n Public Works Director March 5, 1994 Page Two Please send the information requested to my aadress on this letterhead. 1 am the Managing General Partner for the Pac,. Industrial tit--ip, the partnership which owns .q-Econor v Storsge, if you wish to contact me by telephone, my number is 292-8689, or 292-9605. Thank you in advance for the information and your assistance. r Paul B. Smith Managing General Partner Pace Industrial Group MEMORANDUM TO Abdoul Gaf—, O�TB --GAa6A&6-- FROM 'ion Mon ahan SUBJECT L.I.D. 314 Par a meeting with Ralph Gilbo on 8/25/82, would you please secure the following Information for Patrcls 32 through 47 inclusive so that Mr. Gilbo can proceed with the appraisal of said parcels: Title Reports Reduced set of plans Parcel maps Area of Parcels T&A Records Parce: map showing all of the parcels Mould you also secure from Bob Hammond the accident history for East Valley Road from S.W. elst St. to S.N. 16th St. for the past five years and obtain from Martin the which he took before construction commenced so that if Mr. Gilbo re4uires a copy we can have them prepared. DGM:jft OF RA, 1 G OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY RENTONMASHINGTON sVs ws•w.rce w.•as ,00 s e.s s..ss. • .sn.o, w.sn.,•rw N•sr ns Mn n9 AWMENCE 1 WARREN. o . ...o•ns• DANIEL KELLOGG, •ssn•.+• ..,. p DAVID M. DEAN. qw o Sept MARK E sARSER suse.n• c •• wne. January 13, 1963 ZANETTA. F6'TES. susr.n• o•.a••wr TO: Richard Houghton, Public Works Director FROM Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney RE; Appr..isals re LID #314 Dear Dick: You will find enclosed three appraisals done on LID #314. The first appraisal is a rather lengthy appraisal dealing with the entire LID. The two other appraisals deal with specific parcels of property, those parcels owned by Kohl Excavating and Red and White Construction. (Pierottis). These appraisals tell us a number of Lhings. 1. That the assessments are disproportionately hil;h on the properties located on the East Valley Highway. 2. That the assessments are disproportionately low on the large tracts of property 3. That the assessments co_ 'Dusted upward on the large tracts of prope. still be below the amount by which the piops y is benefited by the LID. To use an example, the appraisal would show that the Red and Incite property is benefited by the improvements at 40c per square foot. On the other hand, the large parcels of property are beneflte,' by $1. 19 per square foot. Therefore, the larger parcels are benefiting by three times the amount per square foot than the smaller properties are. This will allow the City Council sub- stantial latitude in revising the assessments on these properties, should the Council so wish. It would appear that from our appraiser's information and from the information provided to me by appraisers for the property owners on the East Valley Highway that some down- ward adjustment in those assessments are absolutely necessary. I amount of the downward adjustment would be up to the discretion of the City Council. Richard Houghton Page 2 January 13, 1983 After you have had a charce to review the appraisals. I would suggest that you and I meet and discuss ways of approaching the assessments so that we can present an organized method of transferring this information to the City Council . I Lawrence J. Warren LJW:nd Encl. CC: Mavor Council President P.S. Please find enclosed the bill of Mr. Gilbo for doing the appraisal services. I have previously obtained the Mayor's authorization to expend this amount of money. LJW OF RE. ti OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY* RENTON,WASHINGTON t� r ~' z• W9+Orrp♦O.ait .Op i•!Wln,♦N.hw. ♦ Il.+P n.YM`P MOST llf.M•♦ L.AWRENCE I WARREN. c•+.+•a+ne• DANIEL KELLOGGc..+++o♦+♦• P� ♦ DAVID M DEAN. .se!•+n• c•+.+.a.wn 40 Moto�/ MARK E 9ARRER +}as•.nr ...P.z• Jur- 25. 1982 TO: DICK HOUGHTON, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS FROI• LAWRENCE J. WARREN, CITY ATTORNEY RE: LID 314 I think it would be a good idea when w• finally settle on an appraisal method to hire an appraiser to review the assesFments on the property on the East Valley Highway. That information could then be available to Citv Council and its Board of adjustment. I think we are going to get one or more legal challenge and I think we ought to be ready for them. At the same time I would suggest we keep going with our intended -e-evaluation of the appraisal methods for 314. I know that several of the property owners down there want to work with us despite Mr. Wilson's attitude. You may have oceived Mr. Wilson's letter recently and 1 do not think we really need to involve him much in the process as he is not going, to agree with anything. Lawrence .1, Warren LJW:Js Trai.samerica Tole 5erv,ros Statemem -11 � ♦' uAa to Rf.A'Y"L i ANY PAYMVNI RE 04 Y AREA t S OAT[ iNtl M CREdtEO ON YOUR NEAT�tAYEMENT tLM M101RIL � Tran"motles TWO InOulnnq Compan•• I p; .i W 4ta. . NttRAL !NOORTS TP tH!K ALWIR(� LYF KE' .: •ti z PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT UE31GN/UTILITY ENGINEERING 0 235-2631 ✓g MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE.to RENTON.WASH WOES F 1TEr 4EPt BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR October 29, 19B2 TO: Don Monaghan FROM: Abdoul Safour SUBJECT: Title Reports fur Parcels 32 to 47 L.I.D. 314 Attached please find the statement for the su"iect title reports issued by Transamerica Title Insurance Company, atone with a breakdown of the costs. Order Parcel Nc. Title Order No, Description Charoes Received 32 8 38 780783 Nerlino 213.00 Yes 33 to 36 780781 Hawk 213.00 Yes 37 780779 Younker 213.00 Yes 39 A 40 780777 Taylor 213.0o Yes 41 780780 Kohl 213.00 Yes. 42 780776 Magnuson Not Yes Received 43 7BC775 Pierotti 213.00 Yes 44 780786 Jonathan 213.00 Yes 45-A, 45-B 7807B7 Bar in Not Yes Receive 45-C 780778 Sea lc Eye Not Yes Received 46 780782 Younker 213.00 Yes 47 780788 Younker 213.00 Yes i OF R r PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT � RICHARD C HOUGHTON • DIRECTOR O i4 MUNICIPAL BUILDING 300 MILL AVE.20. RENTON.WAS" EBOMI 9 tp� 206 235 2569 "tp sLP,,� INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM BARBAPA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR Date: February 4, 1983 To: Larry Varran, City Attorney From: Dick Houghton, P/V Director Re: L.I .D. 314 Reappraisals Enclosed are copies of appraisals that property owners had prepared to contest the assessments on their property for L.1.0. 314. You may wish to reviuv these appraisals In conjuntion with the appraisals which Ralpn Gilbo prepared for the City. DGM.jft Enclosures pF RFC OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY RENTON,WASHINGTON t.1 � � Z •os+a••a w.an wa s a..ar•s[r • ax.cn.«.wssc.ax aw» >as N>• F LAWRENCE I WARREN. o+.•..o•xa. DANIEL KELLOGG, •ssaux. p..artwr. p.� DAV ID M DEAN. •arsrw+ c+.•s,p•y, rF0 9EPSE MARK E.SAR9ER •as s.w. a+r.+.or.a. ZANETTA L FONTE3. •s:nrw. ...•..p•xN March 20, 19b4 MARTHAA FRENCH.•ass*•x• c.+..+wxe. TO: Don Monaghan FROM: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney RE: LID #314 Dear Don: JLst after you and I talked the last time about the assessments on LID u314, I had a phone call from the ocher or agent for the owner of a storage company. That company was included in LID #314 and he was complaining about the size of the assessment. That individual indicated that they would come to the City Council meeting and protest their assessment as it contrasts with the other storage outfit that was included in the LID. I think this is advance warning that we should have our facts and figures prepared to cortrast the two storage companies. We should know '.e dates that they developed, the development standards that were in effect, the number of square feet of the property, the front footage of the property and what new items were added to the property in the wav of benefits . For example, the old storage company may have already had drainage and two curb cuts while the newer storage company may have had no drainage off-site and only one curb cut. It would also be advisable to have a short synopsis of the appraisal information of our appraiser ready for the meetinp . You need not hand it out but it would be very wise to be ab7.e to refer to it. We should have the original of those documents available for the Council. Lawrence f, arren LJW:nd cc: Mayor umo-I 19 10 20y1, YIIKTFN Mlpl b 13MS6 LMMS C D 11 M ART IN IR DM ,01 111 D0E LC SY )t 61MtY W 1t002' 1•S ALL Or MA VE DI OtSt a Ev I ' 31ryD66(0((M(iM([y,SSTIK {�q� 21E296 Mp{�EpW1TwoU9[IEW(EM I`K10p wpEMtitpl! 11 1 t1E�E 1E�E �iM SUITE 2S1 IaviLOTS 112 T�yUyni :T w; Tgi/ 1 2W1 3360W00pD-00 +. 9,7107A ,{ 1 1 Il6C10� I40UITOIK 6ppy� 266291111LM4S EMLIK'M WIVE' 1 M '35,0tdpOjir DRIE�N[ t1T6Y WIVE 751 a� LESS Sl ANY SxO*-MS-OI II TMU 21 3 t M1 r0 It .2 1 70y� ID SfEU6 11M2SIY A057t,,NIILMMSQ Fou prEMLI `TU w0ENM5 41 VAT IT M4 MLLEWEI W 9p09 L7j�(taas1�0w lu IT Of OTS 15 NUKR 2T{A El[r IVTQJ m Oit vM LOT _ SST M TO pq ST 6DJ LOTS + MU � VM 6 OLC i 13tM0-0125-oi 1 Tift Y t 1 1431 1 CITY of RE4104 xI LL7t4S EMI IMTOY 6MON$1 I any "a a" LESS Sy CST, VKL 3736y06E�',3o1St•OCDE E !M DM1 t10201 FORRL4M5 M`iKio4�p1O1M7 S7/ 1 ) *w I , 71 365�.01"IELD bo 1 T w e{ 25 Tau 3i 11 ct[v[1YM D1 u,i, SxOtO-0b25-00 9 14Eu 16 5 9.7107e 11 7 0971 1 1 717tW VKL[• Orq(f 1 I6 40205 11L FMLINGtOM w0[45 1 7 365o "Al FULD tD N12, 334040-0745-05 D 14 ,reu«xr,roY �� r' �r fJYI ru Xwc u,n roTK .rrl,i..o' 1,...n SSt060d)tS-0T - T Flow v 6 YpILF, MiiCf t IM DMX L,) MILLM4S fMLIMTO1 wbEMS tl[VFM�I U Ib N121 L[SS 51 LESS $T Wl p�I17 11 CITY (I=Yt� IOt7 NIL Call tlMt r EMLSI I46Tgr 6�pOE11' ' 1 ' ir11 30� t t1t1 O 48M(JET E W IMLL NO33 L, LI I41Y / 5 Y-1 I i SSMI401010-01 CTT, « t"TMl N IMMS EM M LINGTON 6Df4$ 1 1 1 '�'TT k1lttl L{�S IT HUT 0111111,W 1340W.1020-01 L[4�S OL4 4 OS11 NI`U61I IMLIKtp,wbfYs 1 P 1Dl4ION U, 3 9D03513h-�% S at 57 w, pb57CIR Of IM" [MUKTpN GMofYS / 1 CI It IDf611tp l2 It wY ofa Y6LL ItYTOE W S%D40-1075-07 35 TO 61 7 1 IIOOp 1 ,p6 iM Uh 01 IQ 1 L`4MS IMl�46tq,`MOE1yy 1 1 ttin,an tt tIP11 { 6Esk[51 w, FT l ALL 77 To, It SESEtO.r O 0 01 IVNI-06 SI EARL INwpMS I f 3 5 i wE 1Q ssa0 soli 3 zes< v71 1°Z701 ,�31 2 ° S1ii L[S!r4Y Y 0r 7NL"'AtWa-tPiutca1�0Yr cMn�„F w,tlts st wt INalaM1D N i3O) p.ii� Sia7rtt W it t p ]D3f13_p10]"(A n,K'tto 0 KK ttf4O�YD Sol' v&t i r I 3 hu 1�7 lOS 6l 1�fS1 '°OV N114 as Of s Y ,'� ,1 ,N3T Sarni W .pS Diq I'll 6 )D'3 71 li i5 MiS M`N Or{�rolIt 1 3 MMA104 Mlit■PNlK0i771 S� KYYlK YII S C�5T1t15 n 1 MILW rat1f1t DLK NlM'S 3 P1�a NR. 1 i. tP,n( w Art r 10'M IMe� Sy n Ipes I"Ov.- lSSt10„f0 $O C L 1 n M i105 ° I list as ems I 'I till at ..DV:t[S lot t1 Ti'a7 Wto t `n( { io�ow i" pal l7ji4 of 1t% SfS�30yi3Y0 p I tff I MuiWf W ra�3.3.r�3rlcslM eD � } 1 nl N ,fit0.S 'f'' S571�OV .�5) D1rM 9.71 r e ,M7 55�yiti3 7t y 04 L01 oSr Y II i�M S " M, ISM Sy�11 N 11310i 1 Stli�S�M l DM zo ■K 14MKa TT $100 M YO t air Liss S p107 0 r5 p n I yp"3yo5a W e/■fal II pavj4,Q7-OS 10„S4. °41.1(ml�t i ■ 2 7 T[0 60 0 IeM i MI "r' 1 �]Qppaiii/7rTTT I 1M■Y u 3 S S Myy°Ifi Ot ■( t l S ft OI rlt ' 1 u■ia W iW 700■,/,�0/�5106 110 WJ� 5115 S LS r 17 iisws `W11 {pa no, 17D fEC 1�171,11r SWAP, N,le of o Sifi"t of�l1 i�iTii � 3 11a1t,■° 70115 NeVitt W 11M[�1��!�i' e 0 ygSS Sf tp�i of SI it 11 ftt 1 73� p _L R-V•i.' n t k �y yr rs ID to pp00 p 7107€1 . ".L0. 01 a[■1 L lili ■ p4]-OS N%Pi!VMl f L0. f �2 K i it" p3py.V10i'0) SQe7D lOt _....,, _ ? 2305-911t1'00 r Caay. 11 oru 151 `( e r iSC01 M� } � 1 } F ,1 rin{ 1 IaU001,ae V° 55 MH 1M t ` ,Ulm w ( i ry. ■p■-SN NL t e9 D t S 1 �$�g o � It� li p ( I �ra1N7710 Y !q'14 to 5 jt 1pt�0 to TY 1D it ij�pK',` i SS et1R � it S 7'� J1 3 a ,wJ U�• .�f.MtrS /9"1Su3.d1/ 15 l 9 ,454 J • rc; Public Work* Departs�ent PROM° City Clark At, L.I.D. or Petitioo,; Proteat Letter _---Pk Y-* POhne Co. We fOrIlrd rreferenced. h r"Ith tabulate as ahoy 0° Et• hal rep Pita, t to Councilthulate Percanta`d on this nett, Puhl is Naar Sea tar on •/9/8` M_i=`. OLYMPIC PIPE LINE COMPANY wo so\tv R w10M ww\w�aGfOw\\\t` April 9, 1984 Ms. Maxine E. Motor City Clerk City of Renton Rentor Municipal Building L� CITY CLERK Renton, WA 98055 Re: Olympic Pipe Line Company - Objections to Final Assessment Roll for LID 314 Dear Me. Motor: The City formed LID 314 through its own action rather than by petition of affected property owners. A review of the history of this LID leaves one with the distinct impression that the City determined that Im- provements were needed to a portion of Last Valley Road, and It then set about a strategy to form an LID to accomplish the improvements by assessing the entire cost thereof, without any financial participation by the City or other governmental entities, against the properties that basically bordered the Road. During the course of the City's initial effort-a, tettatn large property �wners, including Longacres, requested that , ie U. .,ao include the improvement of a portion of S.W. 19th and S 27 h etrests 4 that the portion of East Valley Road to be included '' , t , *1wtrter t- sa,anded, The City agreed in 1979 to proceed with the ex1 ^. +Vtrlot, Mt art the boundaries of Y..e District, and selected an ass-saw I tathud tot the Pr.. limitary assessment roll. The property owners in the expanded Df\.riot aers aat'ti. I that a hearing would be held on the preliminary assessor .. toll atria, :a+ Tall of 1979. A significant number of property owners pro.@atad, So^ltw.0 t%- Company. Most of the protests were by the property ..wnsrm . tiq "at Side of East Valley Road. In the first preliminary assessment, the City used a combination of assessment methods, with 60% of the cost of the improvements to be spread amongst the properties 1n the District by the .we and terain11 method, and 40% of the cost by the area of the proportion in the District. Because of the significant numbers of property owner@ on the east aide of East Valley Road protesting, the City set about to attempt to reduce or eliminate these protests by reducing the extent of the improvements to be Ms. Maxine E. Motor April 9, 1984 Page Two made, and thereby the estimated cost from approximately 0.99 million to J5.66 million, and by changing the method of assessment for the first time by reversing the percentages, so that 401 of the coat would be spread on the zone and terminii method and 6C2 by the area method. this change in the assessment method meant that met of the assessment reduction would apply to the shallower depth properties on the east sale of East Valley Road. In other words, the City changed the assessat . method so that more of the cost of the project would be assessed against Lhe other properties in the District. As a result of this Company's protest, the City finally agreed to remove certain rights-of-way of the Company from the District, and this resulted in a reduction in our preliminary assessment. The City adopted Resolutions We. 2283 and 2299 creating the LiD and ordered the work by Ordinance No. 3396. In June of 1982, a further hearing was held on the revised assessment roll drawn up on the basis of actual construction bids received, our Company's revised estimated assess- ment set forth in this roll was $15,147.96, based on a total project cost of 16,236,538.56. A notice of the hearing on the final assessment roll hat now been received specifying a total cost tot the project of 36,969,113.60 and increasing our revised preliminary assessment from $15,147.96 to a final assessment of S38,649.36, an increase of more than 155t. At the same time, the cost of the total project has only increased by less than 12%. We hereby enter our objections to the final assessment roll for LID 114. Our objections are: 1. The final assessment roll and the entire procedure utilised by the City with respect to LID 314 has been founded on a fundamentally wrong basis. 2. The final assessment of our property does Dot reflect the special benefits gained by our propei .y from the entire LID improvements. 3. The final assessment of our property does not represent a proportionate share of the total LID assessments. We wen: t a loss to understand how our assessment could Increase by over 1551 when t a cost of the project increased by less tlan 121. We understand that the City has shifted Its assessment approach for the third time with respect to this LID in that the final assessment roll has been prepared by using only the area mathod of assessment and by discarding the tone and tarminit method entirely. This change is unfounded and Improper: (a) It means that property owner have been misled by the entire preliminary assessment process. Had the preliminary assessment roll been advanced on the basis of this method of assessment, there say have been Ms. Max4.,e F. Motor April 9, 1984 Page Three sufficient protests to divest the City of Jurisdiction to proceed with the LID. (b) The concept that the City can initiate an LID on the basis of a preliminary assessment roll that Utilizes one method of amsesmoeot for the LID, order the work, and than, when it,e work has been completed, completely choose the entire assessment method of the LID, resulting in an increase in our assessment of more than 155%, to fundamentally wrong and improper, (c) Our property borders on Lind Ave., which provides our entire access, and we have previously been asert eased for the Improvement of Lind Ave, Our property does not border on S.Y. 27th St. or any of the other street• Improved under this LID. The closest street included in this LID 10 S.W. 27th, and it In more than 500 feet to the south of our property. The discarding of the none and termiali method of assessment in the final assessment roll means that our property Is deemed to be specially benefited by the street improvements included in the LID to the same extent as the properties that border directly on the streets involved, a proposition that Is fundamentally erroneous. (d) The area assessment method now proposed means that our property will bear far more than its proportionate share of the total assessments for the District. We do not see how anyone can contend that our property, which borders a public street providing access to it, and which 1s more then 500 feet from any of the streets improved by the LID, is benefited to the same extent as other properties that actually abut the improved streets. In summary, we object to the City changing the entire assessment method utilized for this LID for the third rise, Its doing so is fundamentally wrong and results in a total subversion of the preliminary &Base ment process. The final assessment roll does not reflect the special benefits received by our property from the LID Improvements, nor does the final assessment of our property constitute a proportionate share of :he total LTD assessments. The discarding of the zone and terminll assessment method where street Improvements are Involved, and at the final assessment stage after using it for the preliminary assessment roll, to clearly misleading and improper and does not reflect any attempt to &seems our property In accordance with the special benefits obtained from the LID Improvements. Very truly yours, R. C. Meadows Vice Praaidest Alammpr RCM:dc Pnblic Works Department rROW, City Clark At L.T.O. a 3i, Protest Ler Pyle tt }Pn or Petition c��, — ..............--------------------- .-_._-----..__..____..... We torvat4 herewith protests as ♦bove— rererenoed. Please tabulate ercent.ages for report to rouncll at Publle Xearin . to be held on this matter on 4 _`�. 3 April 8, 1984 C17Y CLLIAVR Patricia Amu McIntyre John Pours Frank Power! TO; rity Cle0 City of Renton SubJsct{ tooal Improvement District 314 !ie Rm„uaet fcw Canoelirnv of Aszeamments U request the City Council o: the City of Ranson to review and canal the assessnents an certain pro{erties within the Local Improvement District 314. The lots in question are lots 16-25, Block 22, and tots 3L-4J Block 22, Hillmans 8arlington 0ardens No 1, less State fee Properties. 'ehaee lots are located outside the construction +rea, it are included within UD 314 for assesenants only. In construction was done on Maple Avenue S.E., the mervioe street for t`ess lots. '1a other froateas streets, Lind Avenue S.M. and State F"may 405 an unaooessible directly from the lots. According to Mr. Morahan of the City of Renton 9+ginetring Department, the asesaem-nts were for atom Bowers and etres• improvements. As was stated abow,llsple Avenue 5.1, received no improvewnts w►atsoever. Rut according to W. Morahan, everone within the bowularies of LID 314 were assessed not by what they received, but by assessd valcatirn,. his is very noble, but we would like to have the improvements we were charged for. Most other property owners received these improvemanss. when the property caner on raplo Avenue he" these improvements done, we then will be paying for these tiprovem.nts a second t.imo. This ie wrong. It violates the riles that govern LID's. If* also have problems with the assess out itself. Apain uoW the figures that Mr. Monahan RAVe to us, we have bean over charrei or samaon* errered in figuring area size of the lots in a .stion. we were given a figure for increase value of the Iota of .40 per sq. ft. and a figure of .17 per sq. ft. charge for the I rh) aaeasemart, using thelot sisse after the property sale to State of lash1vton for Prwmwa 6059 we were areesed .205 per sq ft for ua Powom lots jLsts 36-40) and .1769 per eq ft for the McIntyls lots (Late 34-35,16-24). 'Is arm enclosing an addendum to this letter showing our calculations using established lot sizes. le feel that you the City Council of t'a Ci'.y of Renton sitting as the Board of tauliaation will hear gar patitions ad do 3ustios for three of us an M►pU Avemma S.R. Patricia Ann McIntyre John lowers Francis J Powers Jr. � a ate. �.. �o• ; f1c lityr� Lod' l9 adoo zs' ' � rroo►t Itr/96 . _ 2/ i y'►fl tio'K�?L' � Z.Y. 23 w 1 pmt �.•rt — /s K io 3 S/C yo U& i11' H4,, )m ! ✓e, 37 791. I 3 6 78op 3't<' ]rG0 � A✓t �-�� 7IO Jjr F tt� 1 . CITY OF Iflfitrl IDTICE OF PJUC *AM NENfON CITY COIKIL RENTON MUNICIPAL WILDING COUNCIL CHAMBERS. 8:00 ►.M, APRIL 9. 1966 , NOTICE OF PUBLIC NEARING ON FINAL ASSESSMff MILL FOR LID MA NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the final Assessment Roll for Local Improvement District Mo. 314, East Valley Road, Is on file In the office of the City Clerk. In accordance with City of Renton Resolution No. 2263. arndd by Resolution W. 2299, creating and establishing Local Improvement District No. 314, and with city of Renton Ordinance No. 3346. ardering construction of the project, roadway Improvements have been constructed, and Include Installation of sanitary sewers, "ter main, fire hydrants, rmrbs, gutters, sidewalks, %treat lighting and all necessary appurtenances In the vicinity of East Valley Nigh"y and S.Y. 16tb St. from SA 167 ramp northerly and masterly to Lind Avenue S.Y. SAID ROLL WAS BEEN set for hearing at a regular meeting of the Rantaa City Council on Aril 9, 1984, at 6:00 p.m. All persons who object to said assessments, or any part of them, way file written objections with the City Clark at or prior to the time and date of the hearing. At the time fixed for hearing objections to the confirmation of the assessment roil, and at the times to which the hearing may be adjourned, the Council sits as a Board of Egi0 laatlon and may correct. :evlse, raise, lower, change, or modify the roil or any part tha'sof, or set aside the roll and order the asses•.,sar. t _a ds nova, and at the conclusion thereof, confirm the roll by orAinancs. TOTAL FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL LID 314c lb,969.113.60 _hrrt, Invl.tBL--- 2s•iLeA)LYAIWMiu•11.1 1. u .._ .—'— — . F.Ljw 0� _._ . ys\r ye"ok _— _ _ ._ .. Iam.\, Ir\\\\MM _ _tW\>F1t.a't a1\ti W1Mm\tNtil ZAn _ .. . •• — _.. r.o, w w ws\.usfL msr co g of 34AO _ — WAW W"as t la ft N t IMAM tt N_a LOS _ .-� _ n 7,�jy7f0 Si � 27 'jj CITY yyOFF RENTONN CITY OF HNON VICE OF RRILIC NEARING NENION CITY GTXIL RENTON MUNICIPAL WILDING t• COUNCIL CINMBERS, 9:00 P.M. .•�'N AFAIL 9, 1984 ' � v lul ICE PJBLIL "I& ON FINAL AMESMW !OLL FOR LID 314 tt,kt�k ' �rttta NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Final Assessment Roll for Cal Improvement •!4 • -Cl.%rlct No. 114. East Valley Road. Is on flie In the oftm.a of the CITY - .a a,.��,.". Clerc. In accordance with City of Renton Resolution No. 2283, amended by Resolution No. 2299, creatinq and establishing Local improvement District "`, ::a• No 31.1, and with City of Renton Ordinance No. 3396. ordering construction of the project, roadway Improveelents have been constructed, end Include Inttallatton of sanitary sowers, water min, fire hydrants• curbs• gutters. sidewalks. %treat lighting and all necessary appurtenances In the vicinity of East Valley Highway and S.N, 16tk St. from $A 167 ramp northerly Mod r;-•'Ct. ' westerly to Lind Avenue S.N. 1 SAID ROLL INS BEEN set for hearing at a regular meeting of the Renton I City councll on April 9. 1984. at 8:00 p.m. All persons who object to r said assessment%, or any part of them, may file written objections with the City Clerk at or prior to the time and date of the hearing. At the ••` time fixed for hearing objections to the confirmation of the assessment roll, and at the tines to which the hearing may be adjourned, the Council sl h as a board of Equalization and ,nay correct, revise, raise, lower, change, or modify the roll or any part thereof, or set aside the roll Mid order the ss%essment to be de novo, and at the conclusion thereof. Lonflrm the roll by ordinance. ---- - - fL ,: TOTAL FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL LID 314: WWI".m%vdw he _-teu M-A.N%U.Mlk"W11Mi erv�mn a n.wl we »name al Ylel .- n. is ore It,!u U.mllew __b>a:! elm twtvlmm __Yr111rRtM Y,YrL fi�tEMq.tiaY =.= _— �_�__._. t �Srl.ST.t!.7.IBL's--?M1l4tL•. .�...___ . 1_�� CITY OF RLNfON 4W S ruthu,-,I AIh>inrot•Ronk, ., ,gmglu"Vit"5•Tek•phcrm(2W7:51-SODS NEC April 9. 19841 R 1994 The Honorable Barbara Shinpoch Mayor - City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 RE: Objection to Proposeu Assessment - L.I.D. 314 Dear Mayor Sninpoch: Superior Fast Freight received its Notice of Public. Hearing on L.I .D. 314 on March 16, 1984, at our Los Angeles offices. That notification vas forwarded to our regional office in Renton the same day, making note that our assessment had risen $14,444.95 over the one received and protested in June of 1982. Prior to the hearing in 1982. the offices of the Engineer and Clerk, City of Renton, were visited be a representative of our company. He was advised that approximately fifteen feet of Superior's eastern property line fell within the 600 foot assessment rights of the city. Considering sucl, a small portion of our property falls within the assessable area, it is hard to rationalize, let alone visualize, what benefits we would gain as a result of this L.I .D. since fifteen feet oo the east portion of our property line only encompasses our fence line and landscaped property bottler. Impruvements identical to :hose required by L.I .D. 314 were completed on our property at the time of Initial construction as a requirement for issuance of our Certificate of Occupcncy. Following is a ligt of the improvements required and completed• custs incurred, and the cost of L.I .D.'s (i.e. 302) that were assessed against us. SONFRI OrltpM. wathmpon a Idaho a Alasaa. western Canada from Southern Cabromw and Aneani fasibound enAe to leas from Southern(alrin,nu Cf + The Honorable Barbara Shinpoch April 3, 19B4 Page Two A. Assessment of $121,904.69 under L.I.D. 302 for improvement of Southwest 34tn, 4outh 41st and Lind Avenue. This assessment covered the me basic improvements As re- quired by L.I .D. 314, except Lind is the primaty arterial route ustd by our company. S. Water main and fire hydrants -- Installed at a cost of $41 ,878.66. A lateconer's agree- ment was approved: however, Superior has oulv regained a small portion of that installation cost. C. Curbs, gutters and sidewrlks -- As identified below: 1. City sidewalk, curbs, and gutters were Installed on Soutbwest 34th, including asphalt paving at railroad tracks and installation of a drainage catch basin ($3,569.00) . 2. City sidewalk, curbs and gutters we,e Installed on Southwest 29th, the norther- border of Superior's property - ($3,063.001 . D. Catch basins with pumps -- Two catch basins were required as a part of initial construction to retain all run-off from Industrial wash products used on our equipment . (Cost - initia' construction cost cannot be segregated) . E. 011 separator tank -- Baffled holding tank required at Lite maintenance shop to collect any oils or debris from our steam cleaning area. This tank is cleaned semi-annually to comply with Metro Industrial Waste discharge limitations. (Coat - $3, 111 .00) . F. Sanitary sewers -- All sewers and storm drains were installed conforming to all requirement■ set forth by Washington Standard Specifications as approved by the City of Renton. The Honorable Barbara Shinpoch April 1, 1984 Page Three As one of the first companies to recognize the potential of the valley area, Superior Fast Freight , av well as ,there, have bore Lite cost of most of the initial improvements in our area. To date, these fore- going assessments have been paid without protest. realizing thet for our .ndustrial community to grow, we must bear some resporsibllity for the costa of improvements; however, the line must be drawn somewhere. Perhaps there was some justification for improving Southwest 16•.h Street to Lind Avenur: however, its impact on our business is highly questionable since Lind Avenue and Southwest 180th have been our main traffic routes for years based on dispatch routing to the majority of our customers. It is our request that our assessment be drnpped or at a minimum re-evaluated downward, based on our distance from the improved road network, its lack of beneficial impact as an access route to our company, and the amount of funds we have airtidv expended for site and area im- provement in the vallcv. Sincerely, SUPCRIOR FAST FR .HT Ter R. Frenca Corporate Staff Manager TRF:pf cc: S. D. Knepp D. L. Castro R. E. Potter F. Carl ?O' Pub'" �aOM; " Worss 0eparteent City Clerk Di, L.I.D. 14 e of petitl" ➢rOteet Letter � M rri, n 0 We foerwarcl nced. he please protests as above, refer Port to to the eheld on this omatat ponl��e�rylieeya ryt. epQe 4 191v4tN d9 , /984 TO : ?/ry or RFA/roN C/ry CLsRA'S OFFICF A'F - </NC Irfm (.✓ zoo mitt OvfnVF SowN L!D 514 w7S9J6AN41r REA/r&V I WA 9E09s S V&.(,-c r . OB✓EC -//v Io F/NAc ASS SSA�fNr ROL c FOR .. :D PLEASF 4F AP✓ISED THAT I AIFRE,AY 0J-IFCr TO /NV RROIOE A! TY BE/VG /NC4VDFL7 AS PRA 7- OF rNF FINAL ASSAr;SAra-,Vr" ROLL FOR 4rD 314 FoR THE" Fo44Ow/N6 REAjow5 .* 1. AI PIK`PERr> /S cncAr4rD OA/ /!MAPLE ,4VF SW, NOr eiv .S'w• /G 'N SrmfEr. 2. rNERF N.A3 SF-OV NO SEWERS , No 'Vf w wArfw .6A0AI/ /-'O CV19455, NO 6urrE*S ) NO 3/DEAVA(A'S , NO A -w SrtEfr 416Nr/N6 , NO NfiV ANYT.4/A/6 /1'Sr444EP OV OrAPLE Avf SW /V THE ✓Ic/AI/ry OIC MY P.QOPERrY . F'4E/9 SE REmOVf MY PROPERTY FRO/" 7H lr ASaE352tF"NT ROLC imam irz5 314 A.vO LET ryosr rNAr HAVE AF.VFF/r" IFROAI rN/S ri ,^e O VEN/EAIr PAY FO.f Ir , 17 /S .• VNOER 3rAN0/N6 r.Vwr •AIF OF THE Mw,/O.B 49EIVEA'ICIAAINs 13 rNb ®o:IA/& e@mpAA Y• Arh .. /PES�L,rA'vccr" Suem/rrFU, ,:or 2A«9 Atk 2 / y f MOArAr/SON W/LGroANS EARL/Nb I.ON Iviz '�APLF Avf'- S•W. 6 ww DE//S �M / RENrAA/ , WP Tt, Public Works De p artment FROM: City Clerk RE: L.I.D. a 314 or Petition Protest Letter Garfield Associates, Lots 4 a 9 - - We fo:vard herewith protest, as above- referenced. for Please tabulate percentages report to Council at public Meeting to be held on this matter on U9/8_yam__ BEFOU THE •',?' A' ,� �''� CITY COWICIL. CITY OF RVITC't YOTICS OF PdOPOS, IYPR0vE"E1:7, ) LID 314 FINAL ASSESSt''E"T POLL A30 11EA^I'IG THEREOII '^Mrr OF PP3TEST OF Fl^,fIELn ASSOCIATES i Garfielo Associates, 20' S,'1, 34th St., Renton, A'ashin;ton, 9MS, owners of Lots 4 and 9, Block i, Burlington 'lorthern Orillia Industrial Park, Renton &I. protests the estimated revised assessnent against the aforesaid property in tee anoUnta of S9?,441.27 for Lot 4 and $97,154.57 for lot S, on the followin3 grounds : 1. Failure to ri vve 4etice of Hearin;s en nr„pose3 I �araveients Plthou,h ,,r•arfiold Associates have teen the loyal c,;ners of the aforanenticned property since IS74, e, notic? cf h^.area; ,;as ;iv,n an W 314 until the receipt of ; , e ce of Devise: dss,ssncn; -ell an] 4earin� Tt.areen dated Jun 1 (received 'tiy Zn, 1' 2j . T=)cs tna taxpayer we% deprivad of due pr -;s of lam anC equal ;lrotection of la� by failure to ;iva it an :y to anprar o;, csc sair, _.ro,ec• a: City Council hearinDs he hi cr. ':ove^her In, 1°7" an-, J nri 7, 1 "r, 2.. Chance of Assessment ratios Without Puolic i;earin: Canfield is infor-e1 ana Celioves that su:"seG�er" tc t)e Decenber 10, 1979, pud is hearing, the then pud is corks director net with certain protesting pro;erty owners located on the east side of the East Valley lilghwaj a^i arras;ed to cndnge the method of assessment se as to recce the arcant of their assess-.ents and thereby thrc;, t`•e greater share of the cost on the property owners lying west of East Valley 'lirhway, al' without notice Of public hearing. As a res .'t of tsat procedure, prcteSts to the prdaect were either withdrawn or not filed so as to persuade the City Council that the pro„ect should be approved at its January 7, 1"D Outlic hearing, Garfield is informed and believes that subseCuent to the June la, 19;: public hearing on the estimated revised assessment city officials drain decided to chart;e the nethOd Of assesS-ent $o as to reduce the amount of asseSSIOnts to property e4ners located on the east side of the East Valley Etighway and thereby throw an additional greater s' .ue of the cost en the property owners lyin., west of the East Valley .;ay, all without notice or public hearing, This second chan;e of assessmant ratios +gas naJf to a-eltorate protusts of t!•o east si.:a ,.::erty owners at ti•' expense ajc eftri-iert cf tho west side property c-ners. 3. ".'et,iod of Det-r°.inin, 4ss^:a ',,nt Ihan;ei Arbitrary ac: Ce(+ricious The e'.-.av@-CeS.'N t^: Ch;.` . t: 4n tr- netmcd et assessment were arbitraril:, and capriciously Irk, h,u not n88e en the basis of bonef-it, but rather as a part Of ar effort to relieve protests , tf:crety illegally in;,osin; an unfair Shan+ of t!,o cost Of the pr'.)c'Ct c.�t�: rarfiele and C?rta'n O'^ors. In addition th7 present nethoe of assessin; is inequitable, arbitrary end inlawful , in that it imposes a ;rossly disproportionate azuart of the cost of the improvement on Garfield as cempareo .o other -reee^tics that clearly benefit as mac". or --ere fra, said inprovenents. The Lity's aparaisat or whits the chane in assessment was predicated assures a fallacious increase in value to protestant' s property ty reasah of Li^ 314 iiprove-ents. Protestant's property alreaty had the tnprweients bein; furnished by LH 314 by reason of inprov-`ent% to Lind Avenue, S.l:. 34th Street, S.:I. Alst Street, and S.1;. a3rcl Street. i.e., sewer, water, %utters, curls, sidewalks, catch basins, lightihG, etc. It should net nou be required to pay for inprovenerts that only benefit others. Yet its assessment was increase: 'ore t:+an 25C. while property frontin3 on Lhe i--provements whit'+ "ine<.. the tenafits had their assess'lents reduced in half or more. At the sa,•c time, property lyin, tmediate' , adjacent to Garfield of the ap,Proxina`. sa�r size (benefitin ne more or less than Garfield fr - tits L'.: J ha^ an ass es-, Prt a'r. tc a :,riziidtL'1y 1/F. (r,tr..Wi,ihth) of ..,rfiel+i's ($1sF.G:S, a a, Pray,, for "eIIef Protestant rarfielc rs(aests t73t its assessment bb delotcd or str i,.lur. dr.; its property r�zssesseG en the bJsis of its trjf—,enefit ( if any tc be -:ierivC; from said Li- . Gatrd A"ril r 1'!'r 15.L II,Tc3, LT' , Protestant General Partners TO: Public Works Dep ,•. :.ment FROM: City Clerk RE: L. I.D. a 314 Protest Letter or petition Thomas R. Dahlby, Lots 22 and 23 ---------------------- --------------------------------------- We forward herewith protests as above- referenced. Please tabulate percentages for report to Council at Public 4 wring to be held on this matter on 419/84 MATT SATIRE r[rf[w.r„>axfxew(-u[ w>r[x•+<r,[wfox wxuaxa •w[•coo(>of• o r•fw�xeeox oe aw> �oa x,r[waox fxw[[. uf.00(, •t�)1\(, W��w�N 6TON ONO� f0 f[•ry.[e„.(( 1tl-1600 April 3, 1984 Renton City council Renton MuniTipal Building 200 Mill Av.anue South Renton, WA 98055 Re: Public Hearing on Final Assessment Roll for LID 314 Scheduled April 9, 1984 Honorable Members of the Council: I appear on behalf of Thomas R. Dahlby, my client, of 3213 Mountain View Avenue North, Renton, Washington 98055. Mr. Dahlby is owner of Lots 22 and 23, Block 21, Hillmans Earlington Gardens 01, Less State Hi,..way. The Final Assessment Roll schedules assessments on Mr. Dahlby's Lot 22 and Lot 23 of $983.58 and $1,30.75, r^spectively. Attached hereto and incorporated here'.n by this reference is a photocopy of the notice received from thA City of Renton pertaining to that as- sessment by Mr. Lahlby,and I incorporate that herein. LID 314 in no way benefits Mr. Dahlby's Lots 22 and Lot 23 above-described. There is no justification for intludinq Mr. Dahlby's Lot 22 and Lot 23 above-described on the Assessment Roll for LID 314. Mr. Dahlby is owner-operator of H. Dahlby Company, Inc. with offices on Lots 21 and 22 above-described, The City of Renton Public Works Department by its letter of October 1, 1982 to Mr. Dahlby did confirm that LID No. 314 provided no benefits to the Dahlby property Renton City Council April 3, 1984 Page Two above described as Lots 22 and 23. A true copy of that letter is attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. The Dahlbv property above-described as Lots 22 and 23 are commonly known as 1402 and 1412 Maple Avenue S.W. As the City of Renton Public works Department letter emphasizes. Maple Avenue S.W. is not served by LID 314. The nearest improvement from LID 314 is between 800 and 1.000 ft. in distance from the Dahlbv property above-described. Accordinaly, Thomas R. Dahlbv does herebv obiect to confirmation of the said assessment roll on the grounds that the inclusion of the Dahlbv property above- described and known as Lots 22 and 23, Block 21, Hillm'ns Earlinaton Gardens il, less state highwav, in said assess- ment roll is founded upon a fundamentally wrong basis and the decision to include the said Dahlby property in the assessment roll was arbitrary or capricious. Respectfully, MATT SAYRE Attorney/.Agent for Thomas R. Daf,. y MSahc Enclosure 97f uF RFC ,yry Z PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT _ DESIGN/UTILITY ENGINEERING 235-2631 0 ✓� MUNICIPAL BUILDING 2G.i MILL AVE.SO, MENTON,WASH.1e066 9 b �,p�P rPD SE PIE^' BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH October 1, 1982 MAYOR 61ta H. Dahlby Company, Inc. 1402 Maple Avenue S.Y. Renton HA 98055 - -" Subject: Extention of Sanitary Sever North of S.W. 16th Streat onto Maple Avenue S.W. Dear Mr. Dahlby: Your request for the extension of sanitary severe north on Maple Ave. S.W. to serve your property can not be honored at the present time. it was not planned to provide severe to your property as part of the improvements installed .ndsr L.I.D. 0314. However, if your neighbors and yourself wish to have this improvement included as part of the L.I.D. Improvements and wish to have your assessment increased accordingly, to cover the Coat of this Improvement, you will need to provide written agreement to same. if you can not get all the property owners to agree at this time, you could have the line installed and request the City to grant you a latecomer agreement where by you rcollect a portion of the installation coats as the properties connect to the line. Hopefully this information in sufficient to allow you to pursue your various alternatives. If I can be of any further assistance, please advise. Very truly yours, Richard C. Houghton Public Works Director DGM:ckd rot Public Works Department PROM: City Clerk RE: L.I.D. s 318 Protest Letter or Petition James L. Hawk -------------------------------------------------------------- We for we rd herewith protest• as above- referenced. Please tabulate Percentages for rcvort to Council at Public Hearing to be held on this matter on 419l84 HAWK JOINT OWNERS 6808 60. I404h SEATTLE, WA. 98I78 April 4, 1984 CITY OF RENTON RENTON MU141CIFAL BUILDING RE%—N, WA. 98055 ATTENTION CITY CLERK, MAXT':CE E. MOTOR We wish to protest the final assessment for Local Improvement District p 314, bast Palley Rd. We have enclosed a copy of benifits to our property by L.I.D. p 314. Mr. Hoofer estimates that the increased value of the property is only S I2,000 tr a maximun of a 20,UUu. Our assessment totals S 45,243.54 and this exceeds the benifit by more than S 25,000. We hope that this assessment may be lowered. Yours truly James. L. Hawk JHilt At n �np•1411'�^tNiN al ij4kk,JN t57 t 11.111 AA PI pM`t'. lk'Ik AIN'\\.v111114iU11 WX)4 _YkVISS-StXlX1 February 1, 1987 . Re: Research k Advisory Opinion Mr. taws L. Hawk 00 6508 South 140th Street L.I.D. J14 East le Seattle, Wash.naton 98178 Renton. 0 East Valley load Renton, Washington File: 621226 Dear Mr. Hah: Pursuant to your request, I have evaluated your pc.operp both before and after proposed L.I.D. 314. an a preliminary basis, for your advisor' purposes only, and submit Ay conclusions herein. The purpose of this study is to easier you in objectively analysing whether or not you. property has any special benefits as a result of the L.I.D. and the possible monetary extent of those special benefits, if they are found to exist. I have described the subject property and the L.I.D. and then have evaluated the subject property both before the L.1 '!. and after the L.,.D. Subject Property Decoct lotion: The subject property is a rectangular tract or more particularly, four north ofll thegular Southtractev 160th exit and SR 167`enearp the southycitythree limits of Renton, Washington. The general area is mouth of 1-405, west of SR 167 and east of 1-5. ib knosn as the north end ,;f the Kent Valley, only because Kent is centrally located in the valley. More >pectfl.ally, the West "alley Road and the East Valley Road each run north/south on either side of the valley, both pro.eeding south from 1-405 on the north, all the way to Sumner on the south. The entire valley area has developed into an industrial and warehouse area because of Jib Muse proxlmlty to Sesttl.e, availability to rail service and ease of accessibility to major frsewap. Please note Exhibit A which 1s a vicinity map lmdiutins tom aub�et property relative to the general eovirulrmnt. Research&VWUa*MvE Y I 'o 11 pYnnll« MT BAKER/SNOOUALMI ron tYMYM \11� IL� NATIONAL FORIST W Mtoaa •dY»Y rr N.M S wM� l.rgYF C.. .. .• lY1[IMI. • CPO \. V: .,•• . Everett •� = �•r�O.M W Wig[ / �•M•n.o V[yM• r •• •ypp1Y\I TP. $NpNONISN(.Q1MTI _ PMT AM011 M !•»wi MIND COUNTY »olwFnu '.WTI'. •.»«O�R«inel. •wulw,..,�» �� •GnY •••••II F�.1W •Rea•ww yn•1rM .G.r»I�an 5•.••a. mb. ,Cry•.wu err . Seattle.. f N101M WK(•. •� N EWW Bremerton »N.»,,,,» ,,,,,a„n• Rp1 o.cn,.a v ___ uo�u. "'�5aw enn n•nnv» •Ms.` t� \ ,y W»� •N MM Western Snohomish ' • ��•? •• I[`• 1i••"`* M •w•M v.lrY MT.NATIONAL FOREST SAKER/SNOQUALMIL and King .. : N•�� Counties •� •�. - .,.. I.W.Y .No,T>.IMM ItweO DY IM �\ 1i°`»"� .IUC»45NOOT FlOh•1 MAIM LOM �'.��• T LUM Of S[[III• TBCOma—. � •q_n¢ \INO4N R[[ 2�_ Ll •[umnw •ln�eM. [vj NIY.Mo *'NG C •MM•M • ��Y .u.. •Vw.1«• Y�i.q C O f 10 1 J .tu...... yy, •on.rp l[.I m The subject property is located &lung the eut side of the East Valley Road, within the Renton city limits. Land uses in the area are generally light Industrial with commercial uses near South 180th and transitional uses on underimproved land awaiting development. Burlington Northern ham developed both the Renton 11 and the Uclilia Industrial Park&, whi, are located along the wet side of East Valley Road and across true tha subject property. 'rhe subject tract to comprised of Tax Lot 9b, Tax Lot 98, Tax Lot 99 and Tax Lot 91, all situstod in Section 30 Township 23 N Range 5 E.W.M., In King County, Washington. Tax Lot 96 has 200 ft. of frontage along the East Valley Highway and contains 69,696 sq. ft, Tax Lot 98 adjoins Tax Lot 96 on the south and has 230 feet of frontage and contains 89,010 sq. ft. Tax Lot 99 adjoins lax Lot 98 on the south and has 121.62 feet of frontage and contains 80,586 sq. ft. Tax Lot 91 is at the southeast corner of Tax Lot 99 and has 108 feet of frontage and contains 18,036 eq. ft. All sixes are according to the King County Department of Assu6sments. The total aubj,ct site contains 257,328 aq. ft. or 5,91 acres when combining the four tracts. Please refer to Exhibit B which is a subject site map indicating the four subject tracts. The tracts are more or less level and approximately at &,root ttade with East Valley Road. The site west of SR 167 is toned L1, which to a Renton light industrial cone. Available utilities include a 12" water Bain which in is Rest Valley Road along its east boundary and a 12" sewer lain which is 21 ft. west of the centerline of East Valley Road. Public power and telephone are also available in the area. Last Valley Road is an approximately 26 toot wide paved, two-lane road with gravel shoulders. own NW 3G 23 L E E v N W y.i _— --FT70- Yt lcxtsr MS ,l NOS, �ORME PACT o � �s i y s G� .••y w�n1 " 11 • yy.�s�r•„�C1 �l�M M tQ� US NOIN�d 3L f.4--'."_mot y O ..aw• r © R I u• .. {. ( 1 ••� s p .. S Current taxes and assee*ed valuation on the subject tracts are $3,553.25 for taxes and $184.300 for &@$eased value, wit( $232-600 being allocated to land. For 1983, the total assessment has been revalued to total $485,300. The various subject improvement* are not described because they do net appear to impact our findings. They do inc'uda the Lumber Market which has a wad-frame office and metal "rehouse; world Wide Transmission which has a metal warehouse and Milts Truc' Ing and body Shop which is also a one story metal and w, od-frame facility. The tracts are fenced, have some paving and are genera:ly in good condition. The L.I.D.: An L.I.D. is short for Local improvement District which is a special sasestment district that is established to collect property &ease ments which pay for public improvements that directly benefit the district properties. it is based upon the Revised Code of Washington, RCW 35.43.010 through 35.56.290. The city is to iupartislly and equitably determine the amount of charge each property owner band upon the special benefit received. (RCW 35.43. 040.042 4 35.44,010). Special benefits ate those benefits which accrue directly, solely and pecularily to the advantage of the subject property. 'those benefits are dlstinguiahed from general bonstitt which ate those benefits which arise trust the fulfillment of the public object which Justified the L.I.U., such as the enjoyaent of the factlitieb provided by the L.I.D. and from the increased general prosperity of the community an a result. Special benefits are generally thought of as being measured by an increas+ in property value at least equal to or in excess of the proposed L.I.D. assessment. it my also provide a utility that was not previously available making the land more saleable or developable; it may reduce the cost to connect to an available utility due to proximity; and/or it may provide or create special ingress and agrees or change the probable highest and best use and therefore change or enhance the land value. These are all examples of special benefits to a property. Methods that can be used for the city to assess the property specially benefited can be referred to as the &one termini method, square footage method, front frontage method, unit method or a combination of the above methods. 6 The subject L.I.D. 314 includes improvements to the streets, and the water, sever and store drainage systems in the ate& from S.V. 16th to E.W. Urd Street in a northisouth direction and from East Valley 'sad on the east to Lind Avenue and the Long&cree Parkway on the war. Along East Valley Road and specifically near the subject Property, street lights, & six foc.t concret- sidewalk, curbs, * widened 36 [Out road and a 10 Inch &con drain system will be installed. Y tease refer to Exhibit C for a violin depiction of the proposed subject site improvement&, a retlectM by .tones and Associates. Engin&ero for the pruject on behalf of the City of Ronan. It currently would be difficult to ascertain what, if any, special benefits the subject elte would have as a result of the L.I.D. Sidewalks are not needM where no pedestrian traffic exists. The wider road would appear to be a general benefit to the community at large, inasmuch &s existing development In the subject area don not fully utilize the current road. The curbs ace a function of the storm drains and gutter system. The storm drainage could be a benefit when the area to fullch ly developed. However, the extraordinarily large store drain pipe, increases in sloe from scuth to north to obviously very expensive and would appear to have a carrying capacity much larger than needed for the subject and properties specifically adjoining the goat Valley Highway. which are apsrcily developed at beat. The specific benefits of the L.I.D. appear to be primarily to the large, vacant, Industrial park properties along the "at old* ofhich when ast Y Road, which are low and sot and have a drainage problem. w developed would cause a neighborhood store drain problem without the new storm drain system. It would also appear to be questionable &s to whether the storm drain is a special to specitte property or a general benefit for the whole community at large. The street lights would &ppesr to provide for general community safety, not specific benefits to the subject property. The type of development In the subject erne, namely vacant land and light industrial uses, which has minimal trafllc and/or pedestrian need for sttoet lights at hours when 1� is dark would need minimal llghting of street& silica neither trattic „r pedestrians are existent. It would not specifically appen to he a special benefit to the subject property just because it lights the sidewalk and street. The subject site already has access to sever, water and paved rood, all of which are ad64wtr for the legal and permissible light Industrial un for which the subject property is toned and used. Sub each Preperay,Evaluation before &nd After L.I.D.: In order to ascertain if the current market would recognise 6 ePsclal benefit in the form of increased value to a site for sidewalks, a wider 1 JE _ r �t f K �� YiNf lteN ..rw • "•• Z ' •.e.H , •MIN � b...M.. • • lit <N•1 - t -�.IK'W•'•11I*-Or.i t c •N••� •MM� � J /l —�_...__ . /i -'�� wr-ice•i. -— r'�� it •W•r1••tt ••b MFM•I Ott OW 909 - Cw•w•w• II4 Ct/.••4••M• V K N•M fl L•f ® M•!M Cam• •i •T M K J i i 1, • s M N' .Y W ti. Tw.aY. cN•••••l • s ••.M' . . s I� 1' i • s •6N' •i>Iw�44•. ® •wr•• \ 4 B.N' i s ♦ i /•� J l 4 NlY a.to ••w•rM • 4 NJf i • T 4 N.N' WY••l..M-TM N —�T4fy —1 --19/-• N•••J•l/•M1 • ' I W N•Nl• •.�.•TINN+Mi WIDOW _1"G'r • • I . . Esst VaMfr Road �.�..w •.w Irr•.w Tom•••ir••w ,...� .:... qq O'It-I � O1 • M- - 10 it of, street lights and store drainage in Ilght industrial zoned land :hen compered to a similar site with adequate omits stores drain retention. unitary sewer. waist. paved streets but nr curbs, sidewalks or storm drain system, I have analysed and compared two types of market evidence. un type of evidence include@ tracts representing the After L.I.D. 114 situation, namely improved industrial park *ties. This would *omewbat represent the After or specially benefited value since all the L.I.D. 314 characteristics are in place in s gully improved and developed industrial park. The second type of evidence includes tracts where watar, e@wr and !Saved road existed but no curbs, sidewalks, *treat I or ■loan A.mf�Yio system existed, which basically represent. .Is ^ra 1 .J 1l4 a .aa 11r. 1 have analyzed random land sales which have occurred %rest 1980. 1981 and 1g82 in the two townships of 22 and 27 and the two ranges of 4 end 5. This encompasses the area from south Kent to Renton and includes the Tukwila area. The study included 44) total sales, all which have occurred in the area, 15 of which wore in platted Industrial parks with facilities similar to After the L.I.D. 114 value and the 54 rest finder were in unpiatted areas, where curbs, sidewalks and street lights did not directly relate or were available to the respuctive sale property. The following tabulations indicate each of the four township and rang,• and the arithmetic mean findings of each: 22-4 *before **After Sale Acre Sale Price Price Plat Location S TrR Date Sine Price MIST ton Lng Pd SF Name 1. So. 28Sth L Valley Freevav 36-22-4 2/82 2.5 S 185.000 $1.70 M1 2. S. 221st 4 68th So. 12-22-4 2/82 2.7 177,724 1.31 M2 3. 76t'', S. 4 S. 202nd 1-22-4 2/82 8.5 865,0DO 2.39 M3 4. West Valley 4 So. 212th 12-22-4 5/82 15.1 1.746,000 2.65 M1 N 4th ' Sn 2?ntl 12-22-4 7/81 4.2 535,482 2.93 M2 6. S. Sa80. ' 400 Ilk 14-22-4 12/61 20 2,185,345 2.51 MA 7. Wt.t valley 4 S. 186th I-22-4 3/80 1.657.245 142 S. 7746 S. 208th 1-22-4 10/62 2.5 250,OOC 2. , 1 M2 9. 72nd S. 4 S. 206tn 12-22-4 1/81 27.1 3,350.D00 M1 $2.84 Doon Addn. 10. S. 196th 4 58th P1 Q. 2-22-4 ll/80 7.5 000,660 2.45 M1 11. 1100 30. Sth 25-25-4 8/82 3.1 247.000 1.11 M2 12. 7730 208th 1-22-4 7/62 3.1 318,000 2.35 M3 13. 212th 4 West Valley Highway 12-22-4 11/80 9 747,655 1.91 MA 14. 191 19500 A. 66th So. 2-22-4 2181 15.2 3.004,384 Ml 4.54 S.C. Corp. P 15. S. 194th L 62nd S. 2-22-4 S/87 6.5 934.243 Ml 3.30 16. 22141 Weer Valley Nighvey 11-2C•4 5/81 2 175.000 2.00 M1 17. 62nd S. 4 S. 194th 2-22-4 4/81 3 446,660 M2 3.42 16. S. 196th L 62nd S. 2-22-4 7/81 9.6 1.423,212 Ml 3.40 19. S. 212th 6 West Valley Hivv 12-22-4 6/91 4.1 345.%l 3.06 Ml 20. N 6th 4 S. 228th 13-22-4 4/81 2.2 M.235 M1 3.09 Rant Valley 21 NEC 72nd S. L S. 228th I3-22-4 7181 2.I 320.556 M1 3.35 22. S. 212th 4 7100 61k 12-22-4 6/81 5.4 653.333 2.78 Ml 23. S. 212th West Valley Hivy 12-22-4 6/81 11.6 1,306,666 2.59 _ • Waplatted represents before L.I.D. 314 characteristics Mean $2.28/ef $3.42/of •• Platted represents After L.I.D. 314 characteristics —_ *Be fore Bale Acre Sale Price Location SIT/8 Date Site Price Pd.ISP Looint 1. 2. aide Nth S. at 9600 61k 6-22-5 5/80 13 $1,100" $1.94 M2 84th S. 4 20400 61k 6-22-5 9/81 2.1 352.808 1.96 M2 3. 8400 hlk of S. 208th 6-22-5 7/81 5 500,000 2.30 M2 4. 20280 and 84th S. 6-22-5 9/91 2.3 239,760 2_39 Ml Mean $2.63/e.f. e Unplatted ropraaente before L.I.D. 314 tharatteriatice 23-4 Locat ioo W1s Ar re *Before teAf t or S T/R Dite sit e Sale 1. SEC Todd i Cascade Pz ice PricePd. SF Price Plat 36-23-4 --1-_ onlnt Pd./SF. New 4/B1 5.9 t B1,OO1,B58 2• NW Wet Vallef i Strender M2 S3.90 S.C. Ind. Pk, :5-23-4 5182 7 3. Rooster Rd/1400 blk 59B,6SA $1.96 Ml 24-23-4 11/81 4• Andover Park W. 7U.DOC 2.59 L1 Renton 26-23-i 10/82 2.4 5. E. side 68th S., 100 blk )0000 CH 25-2)_4 10.b 1,464,W0 3.17 5/BO 2,87 Upland. Tukwila 6. SO S. i S. 190th CH 36-23-4 4/60 3.1 200.875 R2 1.49 BN NorPac 7, SW 43rd i 60th S. Ind. Dist. 36-23-4 11/80 Div. 1 11.2 1,425,000 8 S. 190th 4 W, Valle N2 2.92 Div. 2 )5-2)-4 Il/BO 19.8 2,370,695 9. 3900 blk i West Vsl.ey MI 2.75 S.C. Car 25-23-4 3/61 5.8 P• Pk. 10. So. 190th i 62nd South 568,000 2.TS MP ' 36-23-4 b161 2.1 273.657 __ K2 2�99 Been $2.49 • Unplattsd represents Wore L.I.D. 314 $2,82 „ "attsd represents After L.I.D. 314 characteristic, 23-5 *Before •• After Location Sale Acre Price Sale Price Price Plat S/S/R Date SSae Pr it Pd./SP 7, P onirte d. SF I. SW loth 6 Grady — ._ 19-23-5 2/82 1.16 235,350 4.66 !ff Renton 2. SW 27th 6 B. Valley toad - S.W.C. 30-23-5 2/82 4.3 288,000 L! Renton 51.54 3. N aide SW 12th - W, of Seneca 19-23-5 3/82 .46 54,000 5.37 L1 6, SW 27th 6 Lind/East Valley 30-23-5 12/81 38.2 3,714,BB2 1.99 L1 5. WE 3rd 6 29OU hlk 16 23-5 12/81 2.09 300,000 3.30 L1 6. SW 29th 6 Lind 30-23-5 12/81 8.4 750.000 HP 2.05 7. 18441 Get Valley 31-23-5 4/80 3.7 280,000 1.74 M2 S. 18400 Bast Valley 31-23-5 5/90 3.6 503,388 3.21 ML 9. 18441 East Valley Highway 31-23-5 6/90 3.2 298,790 2.16 M2 10. 3400 BIk - Get Vallee Highway 30-23-5 5/81 5 364,948 1.68 L1 11. Lind S.W. 6 Grady 19-23-5 5/81 l 174,260 4_.00 MP Mean $3.12 $1.80 • Unplatted represents Before L.1,D. 314 characteristics •• Platted represents After L.I.D. 314 characteristics Mean values were also used because no clear cut eattat difference could be found Ntwcen fully developed and partially developed industrial land it, any one of the sections or rwnges and because of the preliminary nature of this report. Also the large amount of data could be more reasonably handled by this method of analysis. The four townships and ranges studied reflect from a low mean of $2.26/of to a high noun of $3.12/af for tl.c unplatted or prt L.I.D. 314 value* and from a low mean of $1.80/sf to a high mean of $3.42/of for the p.att*d or After L.I.D. 314 values. In Township 23 Range 5 which is the subject at". the unplatted sales exceed the platted *&lea in value, although the sample to small. In Township 22 Range 5 and Township 23 Range 4, the platted values exceed the unplatted value. In Township 22 Range S. no platted "lea existed. A sumary of this data indicates that the 34 sales wet like the subject situation before L.I.D. 314 Indicates mean unit value range per eq. ft. of $2.63/sf or $676,773 ft - the subject 257,328 eq. ft. site. The 14 sales most like the subject site After L.I.D. 314, .nd speri, :ly benefited to approximately the mews extent, reflectc a mean unit value of $2.66/of or $689,639 for the subject 257,328 eq. ft. site. The difference reflected is $12,866 so even though no or minimal special benefits are visually apparent, the market does appear to reflect that a minimal special benefit does exist but to a much lesser extent that the city claims to exist, since the preliminary assessment charges to the subject property total $130,065. The difference between the market evidence special benefit and the city assessment estimate for the subject site would appear to be in the sub- stantial amount of administrative costs in the project, which amount to over 37% of the construction coat and the large amount of new streets developed in the project, most of which are wet of East Valley Road. The properties wet of East Valley Road, which is where a majority of the L.I.D. is. appear to be benefited the met since they need the atom draine and they receive bettor access due to the new roads being connected to the East Valley Road. In addition, many items appear to be developed oversized to be of a "sole and peculiar benefit" only to the subject site. They appear to be designed or the lar,ler capacities anticipated as a result of the several major industrial parks on the went aide of East Valley Road and even beyond. Thus, they do not appear to be a special benefit to the subject property except in an indirect way. Thus, it wuld appear that your property has a special benetlt Of trom $12,000 to perhaps a maximum of $20.000, as a result of L.1.D. 114. li you have any Questions, please let me know. Yours ve�ryt WOLF SS�OCIATES amea HoeTer, M.A.I. pJtl:dr CERTIFICATE OF EVALUATION The undersigned does hereby certify that, except as otherwise noted in this report: 1. 1 have no present or contemplated interest in the real estate that is the subject of this report. 2. I have no rersonol bias with respect to the subject matter of this appraisal report or the parties involved. 1. ', the '..sat of my knowledge and belief, the statements of fact contained 1, this report, upon which the analyses, opinions ..ad con,,lusions are based, are true and correct. 6. "hte evaluation sets forts, all limiting conditions affecting the analyses, opinions and conclusions. 5. The repot he* been made in conformity with and Is rubject to the Code of Professional Ethics and Standards of Profes lonal Conduct of the American Institute of Real Estate Appraisers. 6. The American Institute of Real Estatt Appraisers conducts a voluntary program of cmitluuing education for its designated members. M.A.1.'a and R.M.'s who meet minimum standards of t4is program are awarded periodic educational certification. I am certified under this program through January 31, 1981, i saes Hoofer, M.A.I. February 1993 INDLRLYINC ASSU4PTION5 AND CONTINGENT CONDITIONS 1. This report sets forth all of the limiting conditions (imposed by terms of my assignment or by the appraiser) affecting the analysis, opinions and conclusions contained herein. 2. No one other then the appraiser prepared the analysis, conclusions and opinions concerning real estate, that ■re set forth herein, un- less othervise noted elsewhere in the report. 1. Neither all nor any part of the contents of this report (especially any conclusions as to value, identity of the appraiser or his fin or any reverence to the American Institute of Real f.etate Appraisers or to the M.A.I. designation) shall be disseminated co the public through the advertising, public relations, news or sales media or any other public means of communication without the prior written consent of the appraiser. a. No investigation of title to property has been made, and premises are assumed to be free and clear of all contracts, mortgages, deeds of trust, leases, use restrictions and reservations, easements, uses or actions pending, tax liens and bonded indebtedness, unless other- wise specified. S. No survey, legal or engineering analysis o' this property has been made. It is assumed that the legal description and area computations used are accurate. We assume existing bou.daries to be correct and assume no responsibility for any conditions not readily observable from our customary inspection, which might affect the valuation, exc^pting those stems specifically mentioned herein. We further assume condition of the property unchanged since date of last in- spection. 6. This report is based, in part, upon the best information available, assembled from a wide range of sources, and V erefore, incorporated data cannot be guaranteed. An impractical and uneconomic expenditure of time would be required to furnish unimpeacha+ls verifications, particularly as to engineering, construction an, structural date, title and use restrictions, toning and proposed public or private projects in the aree. 7. If values are assigned to improvements or separate land areas in this rep,irt, that these values are in proportion to the contribution these improvements or areas made to the value of the property as a whole. S. That the appraiser has no responsibility to appear in court or any public or other haaring as an expert witness, with respect to this property unless satisfactory arrangemants are previously made therefor. 9. The fee received for this assignment is in no manner continent upon the estimate of value reported. PKOFES5IUNAI. QUALIFICAT'ONS ROLAND JAMES MOEFER, M.A.I. EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND: Seattle Pacific University Graduate In Economics and business University of Washington Graduate Studies - Real Estate Research a Economic Analysis instructor - Bellevue Community College Real Estate Principles SPECIALIZED eROFESSIONAL COURSES: Computer Applications In Real Estate - American institute Of Real Estate Appraisers, 1976 Tax Considerations in Real Estate Transactions - Society of Real Estate Appraisers, 1976 The Valuation of Leases and Leasehold Interests - Society of Real Locate Appraisers, 1976 Residential Condominium Seminar - Society of Real Estate Appraisers, 1979 ,,,let Wori-:.ap fur the Financial Community - National Solar Meeting 6 Cooling Information Center, 1979 Rustnest valuation Seminar - American Institute of Real Estate Appraisers, 1980 launtemporary Appraising: Models, Methods b Cases - Northuest Center for Professional Education, 1980 Published April 1981 - Mobility Magasine "A Prescription for Curing Relocation's Ailments" PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS: M.A.I. (14911) - American Instltut^ of Real Estate Appraisers A.A.C.1. (/1289) - Appraisal Institute of Canada National Association of business Economists American Real Estate 6 Urban Economics Association Seattle-King County board of Realtors Approved Level 3 - Federal National Mortgage Association (PMY(A) COMMUNITY AFFILIATIONS: Bellevue Downtown Association Bellevue Rotary Club EXPERIENCE: Principal, The Hwfet Associates, 1974 to Present The western Appraisal Company, 1965 - 1973 President - Daystar Farms, Inc. President - Maranathal Aaaoclativc -= C1 Corp. EXFERT WITNESS: Testified as expert valuation witness In Superior Court in numerous Jurisdictions. PARTIAL CLIENTELE: Aseot Sated with the business, economic or real estate valuation analysis, for but not limited to, the folloving: Shell Oil Coapaey Midas Realty Company Standard oil Company State of Washington Atlantic Richfield Co. King County Dillingham Development Cc. City of Kant Pacific Northwest Bell city of Tacoma Puget Sound Power & Light City of Hequias Honeywell city of Bellevue Foss Launch & Tug U.S. Department of N vy I.B.M. U.S. Coast Guard Scott Paper Co. AMY Corp of Erglnuets Merrill Lynch Relocation Mgmt. Seattle Pacific University Coca-Cola Company C.N.A. Financial Corporation Pentagram Corporatiou Seattle-First National Bank Food Horizons, Inc. Fainter Bank General Telephone of Northwest Sheruood k Roberts, Inc. Payless Drugs of the Northwest, Inc. First Mutual Savings Washington Federal Savings Veterinary Medical Croup& Security Savings i Loan Burlington Northern As Wall as numerous attorneys, accountants a private parties. 1 Suite OR L%`er%VW Bldg 205D 11781 Ammue NE Belk'vv,.1Abshirk9M 98004 2O6A1 5-9BM0 t,7r•t September 2, 1982 Mr. Evan McCord Ru: Research 6 Advisory Opinion Continental, Inc. 314 Impact on Bth Floor Jonathan Self Storage Facility Pacific Building 3600 East Valley Road Seattle, Washington 98104 Renton, Washington File No: 82816 Dear Mr. McCord: Pursuant to your request, 1 have evaluated the Jonathan Self Storage Unit site in Renton, both before and after proposed L.I.D. 314, on a preliminary basis for your advisory use only, and submit herein my conclusions. The purpose of this study is to assist you in objectively analysing whether or not the Jonathan Self Storage Unit property has any special benefits as a result of the L.I.D. and the possible monetary extent of those special benefits, if they are found to exist. I will describe the subject property, then the L.I.D. and then evaluate the subject property both before the L.I.D. and after the L.I.D. Any positive difference which "into after the L.I.D., could be a special benefit as s result of the L.I.D. Subject Property Description: The subject property is a more or less rectangular tract which is located approximately one block north of the South 180th exist with SR 167, near the south city limits of Renton, Washington. The general area is south of 1-405, west of SR 167 and east of 1-5. It is known as the north and of the Kent Valley, only because Kent is centrally located in the vallev. More specifically, the West Valley Road end the East Valley Road each run northinouch on either side of the valley, both proceeding south from 1-405 on the north, all the way to Sumner an the south. The entire valley area has developed into an industrial and warehouse area because of its close proximity to Seattle, availability to rail and accessibility to freeways. Please see Exhibit A which Is a vicinity map indicating the subject property. F r Research&Valuation.Exclusively 6NONOMta"COON tea(( YY d.nnpron 7`7 S MT. BAKER/SNOOUALWE ` Upon Ea+.na.M �� . NATIONAL FOREST W I AnJ . MUTAN NT{ •GgnM f.M WaIY[\ GrIaMUT Q EV@FBI tc, town O . Nra.N Pan P~111 \4rN^•• •mN.nN •Sronannn •l Nrrnpnl �.MMrM�fVllan • ':. . �. .: •A4Nwop0 Mlnor Ib•• ` }KmpMM .MorrnrNae irv' SNGNGSN TYMI COUN _ _. _ POef WC".ON Nr.mnw4 eotNl KING COUNTY MOUN Pf S '� Ba.cn • A. RrNnonO�Xrnmuer •Y•�'^'nik •DrrYNI vw,laen= C - nw.m Mn\lan9 O •WamonE SlNrraaN .. •�� J r 51•nK. Wrn\br Cryaf IM SC8111C n:n!"INrw h iMIP1n• . MertP • • .�i Bremerton G ral.G� I'°n P<Ma V ' •N.Mauk .ISMOwnY �Sn. onn Amnrd.N �P.earo/n � Western Snohomish A.SM •No nanar P.r. _ I$C ANClt MOIM\ and King .Mqr •M.PN wrN, MT BAKER.r5N000ALMIL •a.nl Counties NATIONAL FOREST Awoneo •GO.�I.pIM .i4N..1 war Nsuea DY the �wmn3r •s"`a a'"'0n0 \ '�`MIKaEl SNO01 f eoerN Home loan '�Apena. � Bank o1 Seatoo aPare,c ;IrNUTAN NES Tacoma-. _ . . � nMnb•. r �N i •Sumrra eEnwrt4r t I�Pu tiPnva �rNG CCy.. •�µMnOa �ar,NY `~r1 PIFIiF, 0 a to F COON"� I� 4.N! •feaMrq Exhibit A The subject property is located along the east side of the East Valley Road, within the Renton city limits. Land uses in the area are light industrial, commercial near South 180th or S.W. Ord as it is also known and transitional uses on unimproved lend awaiting development. Both the Burlington Northern Renton If anC the Ori131a Industrial Parks are along the west side of East Valley Road and basically across the street from the subject property. The subject site has 446 feat of frontage on East Valley Road and has an average depth of 450 feet, all lying west of the SR 162 and contains approximately 196.999 sq. ft. or 4.52 acres, according to the king County Department of Assessments. The total site includes Tax Lot 104 In Section 30 Township 23 N Range 5 E.W.M. please refer to Exhibit B which is a copy of the Assessor's subject site map. The subject tract Is level and approximately at street grade with Fast Valley Road. The site is zoned 1.1, which is a Renton light industrial zone. Available utilities include a 12" water main which is in East Valley Road, along the east boundary, and a 12" sewer main which is a 21 ft. west of the centerline of East Valley Road, Public power and telephone are also available. East Valley Road Is an approximately 26 foot wide paved, two-lane road with gravel should. ra. Current taxes and assessed valuation are $12,289.82 for taxes and $1,336,600 for assessed value, with $216,600 being allocated to the land. Tht subject improvements are not described because they do not appear to impact our findings. They do include a multiple unit, concrete block constructed, mini warehouse complex. The L.I.D.: An L.I.D. is short for Local Improvement District which is a special assessment district that is established to collect property assesamenta which pay for public improvements that directly benefit the district properties. . •,00 EAST VALLEY NWY 1 nn th Z 00 Jr O fla I t� i �• rE SR 167 )N kENT HG1/ Y r T AENTCjN I to 2 1 0� 4 of �yy 1 � 6 1` �� a '• Exhibit B -, a �•t - 1 It is based upon the Revised Code of Washington, RCW 05.43.010 through 35-56.290. The city is to impartially and equitably detemlta the "cunt to charge each property owner based upon the apl' ial benefits received. (35.43.040.042) (35.44.010) Special benefits are those benefits which accrue directly, solely and pecularily to the advantage of the subject property. These benefits are distinguished from general benefits which are those benefits which arise from the fulfillment of the 7uhllc object which justified the I.I.D., such as the enjoyment of the facilities provided by the L.I.D. and from the increased general prosperity of the community as a result. Special benefits are generally thought of as being measured by an increase in property value at least equal to or in excess of the proposed L.I.D. assessment. It soy also provide a utility that was not previously available making the land more saleable or develop- able; it may reduce the cost to connect to an available utility due to proximity; and/or it may provide or create spacial ingress and egress or change the probable highest and bent use and therefore change or enhance the land value. These are all examples of special benefits to a property. Methods that can be used by the city to assess the property specially benefited can be referred to me the zone termini method, square footage method. front frontage method, unit method or a combination of the above methods. The subject L.I.D. 314 includes Improvements to streets, water, mewor and storm drainage in the area from S.W. 16th to S.Y. 43rd Street in a north/south direction and from East Valley Road on the cast to Lind Avenue and Longacres Parkway on the wet. Along East Valley Road and specif it lly near the subject property, street lights, a six foot concrete sidewalk, curbs, a widened 36 foot road and a 30 inch atom drain system will be installed. Please refer to Exhibit C for a copy of blueprint by Jones Associates Engineers, as it affects the subject site. It currently would be difficult to ascertain what, if any, special benefits the subject site would have as a result of the L.I.D. Sidewalks are not needed when minimal pedestrian traffic exists. The wider road would appear to be a general benefit to the larger community in as much as existing development does Out fully utilise the current road. The curbs are a function of the atom drains and gutter system. The storm drainage could be a benefit when the area is fully developed. However, the extraordinarily large atom drainage pipe, which increases in site from south to north, is obviously very expensive and would appear to have a carrving capacity much larger than needed for the subject property. /i 9 tia � 7 30- S n. i N O 7' 49' 560 E 23+00 22+00 �, y e x - - j 3 4 ,S/opt of Raquirad It would thus appear to be primarily for the large vacant properties along the wet aide of East Valley Road, which when developed, would cause a neighhorhood atom drain problem without the new stem drain- age system. It would appear to be questionable as to whether the storm drain is A special or general benefit to the subject property. The street lights would appear to provide for general public safety. Vacant land and light industrial uses do not generate awch traffic or pedestrian need for street lights. It certainly could not be specifically construed to be a special benefit to the subject property just because it lights the sidewalk and street. The subject site already h.a access to sewer, water at d a paved road, all of which ore adequate for the log.rl and pemissible light industrial uses for which the subject property to zoned and its mini warehouse use. So act Property Evaluation before and After L.I.D.: In order to ascertain if the current market would recognize a special benefit In the form of increased value to a site for sidewalks, a wider street, street lights and atom drainage on light industrial toned land when compared to a sin`.lar site with adequate onsite atom drain retention, sanitary sewer, water, paved streets but no curbs, sidewalks or storm drain system. I have analyzed and compared two types of market evidence. One type includes tracts representing the After L.I.D. 114 situation, namely improved Industrial park sites. This would somewhat represent the After or specially benefited value since all the L.I.D. 314 character- istics would be in place. The other type data includes tracts where water, sever and paved road existed but no curbs, sidewalks, street lights or atom drainage system existed, which basically represents the Before L.T.D. 314 situation. I have analyzed random land sales which have occurred from 1979 through May 1982 in the two townships of 22 and 23 and the two range of 4 and S. This encompasses the area £tot south Kent to Renton and includes the Tukwila area. The study includes 49 total soles, all which have occurred in the area, 14 of which were in platted industrial parks with facilities similar to After the L.I.D. 114 value and the 35 remainder were in unp Latted areas, where curbs, sidewalks and street lights did not directly relate or were available to the sale property. The following tabulations indicate each of the tour township and ranges and the mean findings o. each: r,,-4 _- Location Selo Acre Salo *Bator* **After S/T/R Data Size Price Price Plat Price Pd./Sr Zoning 1. So. 285th 4 Valley Freeway -._S Pd./Sr SF Na_ae J6-..„_4 2/82 2.3 Ac.2. S. 221st 4 68th So. S 185,000 $1.70 M1 3. 76th S. 4 S. 202nd 12-22-4 2/82 82 $2.7 15 1-22-4 177.724 1.31 M2 12-22-a West Valley 4 So. 212th 5182 5.1 885.000 2.J9 M3 5. N. 4th 4 So. 230th 13 1,746,000 2.65 M1 B• S. 228th S 6200 Blk 12-22 4 7/81 4.2 14-22-4 12/81 20 185,3454a2 2.51 M2 7. West Valley 4 S. 188th 2,185,345 2.51 MA 2-22-4 3/80 8. 19230 Both S. 1.657,245 M2 1-22-4 1/81 6 9, 72nd S. 4 S. 206th 350,000 2.87 fp 12-22/4 1/81 27,1 30. S. 196th 4 SBth P1. S, 2-22-4 3, S0, 00 11. S. 212th 4 West Valley Rd. 11-22-4 11/80 7,5 $2.84 Daon Addtt, 1/81 800,660 2.45 M1 212th 12. 6200 Blk S. 3),g 2,600,000 KI 11-22-4 12/80 1.55 MA 13. 212th 4 West Valley Highway5 337,655 12-22-G 11/80 1.55 MA 14. 191 19500 4 66th So. 2_ 9 004,384 22-4 2/81 1.91 MA 15. S. 194th 4 62n.i S. 15,2 J,004,38G 2/22-4 5/81 MI 4.54 S.C. Corp 16. 22141 West Valley Highway I1-22-4 , 6.5 934,243 2-22-4 17. 62nd S. 4 S. 194th 4/81 3 2 175.000 2,00 Ml 18, S. 196th 4 62nd S. 446,660 M2 2-22-4 7/81 9.6 3.42 S.C. Corp, 1,423,212 It• S. 212th 4 West Valley Highway 12-22-4 a 8/ t 3.40 20. N 6th 4 S, 228th 4.1 543,961 3.06 Ki " 13-22-4 4, 2.2 tu 21. NEC 72nd S. 4 S. 22Bth „_ 296,235 2 , S. 212th 4 7100 b 13 4 7/81 2.2 3.35 Kent Vail 12-22-4 320,558 M1 3J3 23. S, 212th West Valley Highway 12 6/81 5.4 653,333 -22-4 6/81 2.78 M1 11.6 1,306.666 2_59 a Unplatted repre nts Bator* L,I.D, 314 charaetoristiae •• Platted rspresen..e After L.I.D. 314 characteristics MEAN $ 2.14lsE S 3 42/s [ 22-3 Location S/T/R/R Mte Sale Acre "Pri`ee Sale Size Price Pd./Sr/SF Zoning 1. E. Side 84th S. at 9600 blk 6-22-5 5180 33 ac. 1,100,Don $1.94 MY 2. 84th S. 4 20400 Blk 6-22-5 9/81 2.1 352,808 3.86 M2 3. 8400 blk of S. 208[h 6-22-5 7/6 5 500.000 2.30 H2 4. 20280 an! 84th s. 6-22-5 9/81 2.3 MEAN S2.63/e.f. " Unplatted represents Before L.I.D. 314 characteristics ,y, 23-4 *Before •a er S/i/R Locat Lon De« SiteAire Sale Price Price Price Flat Pd./SF Zoning Pd. SF Name I. SEC Todd 6 Cascade Zoning 4/82 5.9 ..1,858 M2 $3.90/a[ S.C. Indua Park 2, MWC Out Va11ay 4 Stronder 25-23-4 5/82 T 598,658 $1.96 7i1 3. Monster Rd/1400 blk 24-23-4 11/81 70.000 2.39 L1 Rentnn 4. Southtenter Blvd., 1600 blk 24-23-4 8179 7.5 800,000 2.43 M3 3. E. aide 68th S„ 100 blk 25-23-4 5180 10.6 1,464,000 3,17 Cm 6. 80 S. 4 S. 190th 36-23-4 4/80 3.1 200,875 N2 1,49 AN NorPac 7. SW 43rd 4 ADth ti, ,nd, OSst. Di 36-23-4 11/80 11.2 1,425,000 N2 2.92 Div, 2 D. S. 190th 4 W, Valley 35-23-4 I1/80 19.8 2,370.695 ml 2.75 S.C. Corp. 9. 3900 blk 4 West valley 25-23-4 Park 3/81 5,8 568,000 2,25 7ff 10. So. 190th 4 62nd South 36-23-4 6/81 2.1 273,657 -- M2 2.99 • Dnplatted represents Before L.I.D. 314 characteriatica MEAN 2 4R/of 2.81/of •• Platted reptesents After L,L D. 314 characteriatice 23-s *before ""After Sale Acre Sale Price Price Plot Location S/T/R Date Site Price Pd./SF Zoning Pd. SF Naas 1. SW loth 6 Grady 19-23-5 2/82 1.16 Ac. 235,350 $4.66 MP Renton 2. SW 27th 4 E. Valley Road - S.V.C. 30-23-5 2/62 4.3 208.000 Ll Renton $1.54 3. N side SW 12th - W. of Seneca 19-23-5 3/82 .56 54,000 5..37 L1 4. SW 27th 6 Lind/East Valley 30-23-5 12/61 38.2 3,314.882 1.99 L1 S. NE 3rd 4 2900 blk 16-23-5 12181 2.09 300,000 3.30 LI 6. SW 29th 6 Lind 30-23-5 12/61 8.4 750,000 MP 2.05 7. 18441 East Valley 31-23-5 4/80 3.7 280.000 1.74 M2 8. 18400 East Valley 31-23-5 5/80 3.6 $03,St! 3.21 ML 9. 18441 East Valley Nighvey 31-23-5 6/80 3.2 298,790 2.14 M2 10, 3400 Blk - Ent Valley Nighvey 30-23-5 5/81 5 364,948 1.68 L1 11. Lind S,V. 6 Grady 19-23-5 5/81 1 174,240 4.00 MP MEAN $ 3.12 51.80 " Unplotted reprnenta Before L,I.D. 314 characteristics •" Platted represent$ After L.I.D. 314 characteristics A summary of this data, utilising mean values because of tha quantity of data, Indicates ttat the 35 sales wet like the subject situation before L.I.D. 314 and 14 sales most like the subject site After L`I D. 314, Mean values were also used because no clear cut market difference could be found between fully developed and partially developed industrial land. So the average difference, after considering all the informatiwi was utilized. The four townships and ranges ttudfed reflect from a low mean value of $2.14 per sq. fI. to a high of $3.12/s.f, for unplatted or pre L.S.D. 314 values and from a low of S1.80/s.f. to a high of $3.42/e.f, for platted or After L.I.O. 314 values. .n Township 23 Range 5, which is the subject area, the unplatted sales exceed the platted sales in value. In Township 22 Range 4 and Township 23 Range 4, the platted values exceed the unplatted value, In Twooshfp 22 Range 5, no platted sales existed so an analysis could not be made between the two but were related to the other sales In the area. The mean unit values for the 35 sales war like the subject situation end before the L,I.D„ reflect a unit value range of $2.59/s.f. or $510.227 for the 196.999 s.f, The 14 sales moat like the subject and after L.I.D. 314, and appearing to be specially benefited, as a result, reflect a unit value of $2.66/5.1. or $524.017 for the 196,999 s.f. The difference between the tow values is $13,790. so even though no or minimal special benefits are visually apparent, the market does appear to ref lest that a special boost', does exist but to a much lesser extent than the city claims to exist. The difference between the market evidence special benefits and the city assessment estimate for the subject site would appear to be in the sub- stantial a cunt of administrative costs in the project, which amount to over 372 of the construction cost, much of which would appear to be attributable to those properties west of East Valley Road, which is where a majority of the L.I.D. is, and which properties appear to be receiving the greatest special benefits of the project. Also, many items appear to be oversized to be of a sole and peculiar benefit only to the subject site. They appear to be designed for capacities anticipated as a result of the several major industrial parks on the weat side of East Valley Road end beyond. Thus, they do not appear to be a special benefit to the subject properrv, except in an indirect way. Thus, it would appear that your property has a special benefit of from a low of $10,ODC to perhaps a maximmm of S20,000, as a result of L.I.D. 314. If you have any questions, please let me know. Your% very t ly, TH�- U A 4OC Roland J/ates otter, MAI <--. RJR:dr r. CERTIFICATE OF EVALUATION The undersigned does hereby certify that, except as otherwise noted in this report: 1. 1 have no present or contemplated interest in the real estate that is the subject of tnls report. 2. 1 have no personal bias with respect to the subject ratter of this appraisal report or the parties involved. 1. To the beat of my knowledge and belief, the statements of fact contal„ed in this report, upon which the analyses, opinions and conclusions are bas_d, are true and correct. 4. This evaluation sets forth all limiting conditions affecting tte analyses, opinions and conclusions. 5. The report has been made in conformity with and is subject to the Code of Professional Ethics and Stindardr of Professional Conduct of the American Institute of Real Estate Appraisers. 6. The American Institute of Real Estate Appraisers conducts a voluntary program of continuing education for its designated members. M.A.I.'s and R.M.'s who meet minimum standards of this program are awarded periodic. educational certification. I am certified under this program through January 31., 1981. - Roland James efer, M.A.I. September 1982 UNDERLYING AiSLWTIONS AND CONTINGENT CONDITIONS 1. This report sets forth all of the limiting conditions (imposed by terns of my assignment or by the appraiser) effecting the analysis, . opinions and conclusions contained herein. 2. No one other than the appraiser prepared the analysis, conclusions and opinions concerning real estate, that Pre set forth herein, un- less otherwise noted elsewhere in the report. S. Neither all nor any part of the contents of this report (especially any conclusions as to val:.c, identity of the appraiser or his firm or any reference to the American Institute of Real Estate Appraisers or to the M.A.I. designation) shall be disseminated to the public through the advertising, public relations, news or sales media or any other public means of communication without the prior written coy nt of the appraiser. a. No investigation of title to property has been made, and premises are assumed to be free and clear of all contracts, mortgages, deeds of trust, leases, use restrictions and reservations, easements, cases or actions pending, tax liens and bonded indebtedness, unless other- wise specified. S. No survey, legal or engineering analysis of this property has been made. It is assumed that the legal description and area computations used are accurate. Ne assume existing boundaries to be correct and assume no responsibility for anv conditions not readily observable from our customary inspection, which might affect the valuation, excepting those items specifically mentioned herein. We further assume condition of the property unchanged since date of last in- spection. 6. This report is based, in part, upon the best information available, assembled from a wi Je range of sources, and th,refore, incorporated data cannot be guaranteed. An impractical and uneconomic expenditure of time would be required to furnish unimpeachable verifiretions, particularly as to engineering, construction and structural data, title and use restrictions, zoning and proposed public or private projects in the area. 7. If values are assigned to improvcmenta or separate land areas in this art, that these values are in proportion to the contribution these .provements or areas made to the value of the lroperty as a whole. S. That the appraiser has no responsibility to appear in coma or any public or other hearing as an expert witness, with respect to this property unless satisfactory arrangements are previously made therefor. 9. The fee received for this assignment is in no manner contingent upon the estimate of value reported. PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS ROLAND LAMES HOEFER, M.A.I. EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND: Seattle Pacific University Graduate in Economic:. and Business University of Washington Graduate Studies - Real Estate Research 6 Economic Analysis Instructor - Bellevue Community College Real Estate Principles SPECIALIZED PROFESSIONAL COURSE':! Computer Applications in Real Estate - American institute of Real EstalC Appraisers, 1976 Tax Considerations in Rea! Estate Transactions - Society of Real Estate Appraisers, 1976 The Valuation of Leases and Leasehold Interests - Society of Real Estate Appraisers, 1976 Residential Condominium '.eminar - Society of Real Estate Appraisers, 1979 Solar Workshop for the Financial Community - National Solar Heating 6 Cooling information ::enter, 1979 Business Valuation Seminar - American Institute of Real Estate Appraisers, 1930 Contemporary Appraising: Models, Methods 6 Cases - Northvest Center for Professional Education, 1980 P3bllahed April 1981 - Mobliity Maga21ne "A Prescription for Curing Relocation's Ailments" PROFESSIONAL AFFILIKCIONS: M.A.I. (04913) - American Institute of Real Estate Appraisers A.A.C.I. (/1289) - Appraisal Institute of Canada Nscle,..,l Association of business Economists American Real Estate 6 Urban Economics Association Seattle-Ring County Board of Realtors Approved Level 3 - Federal National Mortgage Association (FNMA) COMMUNITY ACFILIATIONS: Bellevue Downtown Association Bellevue Rotary Club EXPERIENCE: Principal, The Hoefer Associater, 1974 to Present The Western Appraisal Company, 1965 - 1973 President - Daystar Farm, Inc. President - Maranatha: Association Sol C3 Corp. EXPERT W1TNM:SS: Testified as expert valuation witness in Superior Court in numerous jurisdictions. PARTIAL CLIENTELE: Associated with the business, economic or real estate valuation analysis, for but not limited to, the following: Shell Oil ..apany Midas Realty Company Standard Ui1 Company State of Washington Atlantic Richfield Co. King County Dillingham Development Co. City of Kent Pacific Northwest Bell City of Tacoma Puget Sound Power 6 Light City of Roqulam Honeywell City of Bellevue Foss Launch 6 Tug U.S. Department of N vy I.B.M. U.S. Coast Guard Scott Paper Co. Army Corp of Engineers Merrill Lynch Relocation Mjgmt. Seattle Pacific University Coca-Cola Company C.N.A. Financial Corporation Pentagram Corporation Seattle-First National bank Foot' Horizons, Inc. Rainier Bank General Telephone of Northwest Sherwood A Roberts, Inc. Payless Drugs of the Northwest, Inc. First Mutual Savings Washington Federal Savloa• Veterinary Medical Groups Security Savings 4 l n Burlington Northern As well as numerous attorneys, accountants a privite parties. SUlR`1p.E>cr\\w1111dg205o 117g1.'S\IMN,K\.t fxik.Rta'\\4Shmg1on W&)O4 AOM455-141iBc1 August ', 1962 Mr. Emilio Pierotti Re: Research ► Advisory Opinion 3412 East Valley Road L.I.D. 314 Impact on Renton, Washington 98055 3412 East Valley Road Renton, Washington File No: 82701 Dear Mr. Pierotil: Pursuant to your request, I have evaluated your propf. ty both before and after proposed L.I.D. 314, on a preliminary basis for your advisory purposes only, and submit my conclusions. The purpose of this study is to assist you in objects' ly analyzing whether or not your property has any special benefits as a result of the L.I.D. and the possible monetary extent of those special benefits, if they are found to exist. I will describe the subject property and the L.I.D. and then evaluate the subject property both before the L.I.D. and after the L.I.D. Sub ect Property Description: The subject property is a rectangular tract which is located approx- imately one block north of the South 180 exit and SR 167. near the south city limits of Renton, Washington. The general area is south of I-405, west of SR 167 and east of 1-5. It to known as the north end of the. Kent Valley, only because Kent Is centrally located in the valley. More specifically, the West Valley Road and the East Valley Road each run northlsouth on either side of the valley, both proceeding south from 1-405 on the north, all the way to Sumter on the south. The entire valley area has developed into an industrial and warehouse area because of its close proximity to Seattle, availability to rail and accessibility to freeways. Please see Exhibit A which is a vicinity map indicating the subject property. 1 Research&VWUatiM Wu9V* M - 3 1 The subject Property is located along the east side of the East Valley Road, within the Renton city lima, . Land uses in the area are light industrial, commercial near South 180th and transitional uses on unimproved land awaiting development. Both the Burlington Northern, Renton 11 and Orillia Industrial Parks are along the west side of East Valley and across from the subject property. The subject site has 194 feet of frontage on East Valley Road and has an average depth of 493 feet lying west of the SR 167 and contains approximately 95,642 sq. ft. or 2.20 acres. The total site includes Tax Lot 27 in Section 30 Township 23 N Range 5 E.W.X. and contains 138,956 sq. ft. or 3.91 scras. Please see Exhibit B which is a subject site mop. That part of the site lying cast of SR 167 is not considered, in as much as it has a different toning, access and envlroning characteristics. The tract west of SR 167 is level and approximately at street grade. The site west of SR 167 is zoned L1, which 1s a Renton light industrial zone. Ivailable utilities include a 12" water main which is in East Valley knad and a 12" sewer main which is 21 ft. west of the centerline of East Valley Road. Public power and telephone are also available. East Valley Road is an afproximately 26 toot wide paved, two-lane road with gravel shoulders. Current taxes and assessed valuation are $1,216.98 for taxes and $130,200 for assessed value, with $111.100 being allocated to land. The subject improvements are not described because they do not appear to impact our tindings. They do Include a corrugated metal shop, a mobile trailer office, fencing, fuel tanks and numerous other minor improvements. The subject is used for a construction equipment yard with all improve- ments appearing to be in reasonably good condition. The L.I.O.: An L.I.D. is short for Local Improvement District which is a special assessment district that is established to collect property assessments which pay for public improvements that directly benefit the district properties. It is based upon the Revised Code of Washington, RCW 35.43.010 1 through 35.56.290. The city is to impartially and equitably determine the amount to charge each property owner based upon the special benefits received. (15.43.040.042) (35.44.010) Special benefits are those benefits which accrue directly, solely and pecularily to the advantage of the subject property. These benefits are distinguished from general benefits which are those benefits which arise from the fulfillment of the public object which justified the L.I.D., such as the enjoyment of the facilities provided by the L.I.D. and from the Increased general prosperity of the community as a result. Special benefits are generally thought of as being measured by an increase in property value at least equal to or In excess of the proposed L.I.D. assessment. it may also provide a utility that was not previously available making the land mare saleable or developable; it may reduce the cost to connect to an available utility due to proximity; and/or it may provide or create special ingress and egress or change the probable highest and best use and therefore change or enhance the land value. These are all examples of special benefits to a property. Methods that can be used by the city to assess the property specially benefited can be referred to as the zone termini method, square footage method, front frontage method, unit method or a combination of the above methods. The subject L.I.D. 314 includes improvements to streets, water, sewer and atom drainage in the area from S.W. 16th to S.W. 43rd Street In a north/south direction and from East Valley Road on the east to Lind Avenue and Longacres Parkway on the west. Along East Valley Road and specifically near the subject property, street lights, a six foot concrete sidewalk, curbs, a widened 36 foot road and a 36 inch store drain system will be installed. Please refer to Exhibit C for a copy of blueprint by Jones Associates Engineers, as it affects the subject site. It currently would be difficult to ascertain what, if any, special benefits the subject site would have as a result of the L.I.D. Sidewalks are not needed when no pedestrian traffic exists. The wider road would appeat to be a general benefit to the larger community in as much as existing development does not fully utilise the current read. The curbs arc a function of the storm drains and gutter system. The atom drainage could be a benefit when the area is fully developed. However, the extraordinarily large storm drainage pipe, which increases in size I Wm south to north, is obviously very expensive and would appear to have a carrying capacity much larger than needed for the subject and adjoining property. J 22-4 Sale Acre *Before ea SS/T/R/B Sale Price After Date Site Pr Sc� Pd./SF Zoning Price Ple!. 1• So. 285th 4 e ch So. 12-22-4 _g Pd. SF Rent_ .. lley Freeway 16-22-4 2/82 2, S. 221st 2.3 Ac. $ 185,000 $1.70 `� 2/82 � 3. 76th S, L 2.7 177,724 1.51 M2 202nd 1-22-4 2/82 4, West Valley L So. 212th .5 885,000 2.39 H3 12-22-4 5/82 15.1 5• N. Gth L So, 230th 1.746,000 7.65 M1 6• S. 228th L 6200 Blk 12-22-4 7/81 4.2 14-22-4 185,G82 2.51 .12 MA 7, West Valley L S. 188th 3/881 20 2,18S,14S 2-22-4 3/80 2.51 MA 8, 19230 68th S. 1.657.245 H2 9. 72nd S. L S. 206th 1-22-4 1/81 6 12-22/G 749.315 2,87 � 10. S. 196th 1/81 27.1 3,350,000 58th Pl. S. 2-22-4 11/80 7.5 MI $2.84 11. S. 212th L West Valley Rd. Dann Addn, 800,660 2,45 H1 12. 6200 Blk S, 212th 11-22-4 1/81 31.9 2,600,000 1.57 M1 11-22-„ 12/8o 5 13, 212th L West Valley Highway 12-22-4 747.655 L91 MA 14• 191 19500 L 66th So, 2/880 9 747,b55 1,91 MA 15, S. 194th L 62nd S. 2-22-4 2/81 15.2 3,004,384 2/22-4 5/81 6.5 4.54 S.C. Corp. 16. 22141 West Valley highway 11-22-4 , 934,243 H1 M1 5/8. 2 1.10 • „ 17. 62nd S. L S. 194 th 175,000 2,00 M1 2.72-4 4/81 3 18. S, 196th L 62nd S. 446,66o M2 19. 5. 212th L West Valley Highway 12-22-4 2-22-4 7/81 9.6 3,42 S1 C. Corp. 1,423,212 M1 J.40 8/81 4.1 "20. N 6th L S. 228ch 545,961 3.Q6 M1 21. NEC 72nd S. L S. 13-22-4 4/81 2.2 228th 320.558 H1 3.35 22. S. 212th L 7100 blk 11-22-4 7/81 2,2 Kent Valley 12-22-4 653.338 M1 3.35 23, S, 212th West Valley Highway 12-22-4 6/8' 1.6 306,666 6/81 2.78 H1 11.6 3,J06,666 2�59 " Unplatted represents Before L.I.D. 314 characteristics"" Platted represents After L.J.D. 314 characteristics MEAN $ 2.14/af -__ 22-5 Location Sale pate Acre Sale •Dat9re 1. E. aide 84th S. at 9600 blk SS:e Price Price 6-22-5 13 Pd./SF 2onln ac. 1,100,000 $1.94 M2 2• 84th 5. + 20400 Dlk 3• 8400 blk of S. 208th 6-22-5 9/81 2.1 352,808 3.86 M2 6-22-5 7/81 5 300,000 2.30 4• 20280 and 84 th S. P(2 6-22-5 9/D1 2.3 '39.760 �.39 M2 MEAM 82.63/a,f. • Onplatted cap resent$ before L.I.D. 314 charactarlatica J 23-4 *Before "After P7+t Sale Acre Sale Price Price Namc Loc atSon S/7I R Date Site Price Pd./SF zonin gPd. SF 1,001,858 MI 53.90/d S.C. Indus 1. SEC Todd b Cascade 76-23-4 4/92 5.9 Park 2, NYC West Valley b St ender I5-23-4 5/82 7 598,658 S1.96 Nl ). Monster Rd/1400 blk 24-27-4 11/B1 70,000 2.59 1,1 Rentan 4, °.out hrcnt cr 81ed. , 1600 blk 24-23-4 8l79 1.5 800,000 2.45 M1 5. F.. side 68th S., 100 blk 25-23-4 5/80 10.f, l' t E4,000 W 1.49 BN NorPac 6. BO S. 4 S. 190th 36-23-4 4150 3.1 2C0,875 Ind. Dist. Div 7. Su 4)rd & 80th S. 36-23-4 11/80 11.2 1,425,000 M2 2.92 Div. I xl 2.75 S.C. Corp. B. S. 190th 4 R. valley 15-21-4 11/80 19.8 2,370,695 Park 9. 3900 blk b West valley 25-II-4 3181 5.6 568,000 2.25 MP 273,657 m2 2.99 30, So. 190ch b 62nd South 76-23-4 6181 2.1 _- 2 8110E c1F',AM 2.4810E re 14 •• platted represents representst AfteroLlll.D. 3147 Characteristics Characteristica 23-5-5 Location S T/R Sale Are "Before 1. =W loth 4 ready �` ate Si:e Sala Price "After e Pd./8F Price PIS 19-23-5 2/82 Price, j°�1"H Pd./SF.16 Ac. 235,350 N I' SW 2)th 4 E. Va11eY Road - S.W,p, 1 )O.jJ-5 2/82 $4.66 � Renton 3. N aide 4.3 288.000 SW 12ch - W. of Senecr L1 Renton 19-23-5 3/82 $1.34 4, SW 21th 4 .56 54.000 3'37 LSnd/East Valley LI 30-23-5 12/81 38.2 5• HE 3rd 4 2900 blk 3,Jl4,ggj 1.99 Ll 16-23-5 12/B.l 2.09 6. SW 29th 4 Lind JD-jJ-S 300,000 3.30 L1 12/81 8.4 7. 18441 East Valley 31-23-5 4/80 750.000 MP 2.05 3.) 8• 18400 East Valley 280.000 1.74 MI 31-23-5 5/80 9. 18441 3.6 503,598 East Valley Highway 3.21 ML 31-23-5 6/80 3,2 1 t1. 3400 814 - East Vallev Highway JU- 298,7gp 1.14 M2 23-5 5/81 5 11, Lind S.W, 4 Crady, 364,948 1.68 L] Unpletted re 19-23_5 Srgl 1 174,240 4.00 nta Bef MP Platted represents ",.,or* L.I.D. 314 is[!ca _— character MEANS 3.12 314 char ties S1.80 A summary of this data, utilizing mean values because of the quantity of data, indicates that the 35 &ales must like the subject situation before L.I.D. 314 indicates a wan unit value range per aq. ft. of $2.59/s.f. or $247,713 ffor the subject 9S,642 sq. ft. site. The 14 sales ,cost like the subject site After L.L.D. 314, and specially benefited to approximately the sago extent, reflects a mean unit value of $2.66/a.f. or $254,408 for the subject 95,642 sq. ft. *its. hcan values were also used because no clear cut market difference could be found between fully developed and partially developed industrial land. The four townships and ranges studied reflect from a low mean of $2.14/s.f. to a high of $3.12/a.f. for unplatted or pre L.I.D. 314 values and from a low of $1.80/s.f, to a high of $3.421s.f. for platted or After L.I.L. 314 values. In Township 23 Range 5 which is the subject area, the unplatted sales exceed the platted sales in value. In Township 22 Range 4 and Township 23 Range 4, the platted values exceed the unplatted value. In Township 22 Range 5, no platted sales existed. The difference reflected is $6.695, so even though no or minimal special benefits are visually apparent, the market does _ppeat to reflect that a special benefit does exist but to a much lesser extent than the city claims to exist. The difference between the market evidence special benefit and the city assessment estimate for the subject site would appear to be in the sub- , .antial amount of administrative costs in the project, which amount to over 37% of the conbtructfun cost, much of which would appear to be attributable to those properties west of East Valley Road which is where a majority of the L.I.D. is and the properties which appear to be receiving the greatest special and general benefits of the project are located. Also, many items appear to be oversized to be of a sole and peculiar benefit only to the subject site. They appear to be designed for capacities anticipated as a result of the several major industrial parks on the vest side of East Valley Road doll beyond. Thus, they do not appear to be a special benefit to the subject property, except in an indirect way. Thus, it would appear that your property has a special benefit of from a low of $6,500 to perhaps a maximum of $10,000, as a result of L.I.D. 314. If you have any questions, please let me know. TH rHOEF y truly 6H� Nol awa osier, N.A.I. RJ It:dr S011c IKI ltirfwDl,cl fiki xl:,u N21h.Altvlut \t lkllc�vt.lt.l.lun-4k lux 20*i4S59w+t4Ai August 5, 1982 Mrs. Delores Kohl Mr. Ivan Christianson Re: Research ! Advisory Opinion Kohl Excavators, Inc. L.I.D. 314 Impact on 3330 East Valley Road 3130 East 'alley Road Renton, Washington 98055 Renton, Washington File No; 82717 Dear Mrs. Kohl and Mr. Christianson: Pursuant to your request, I have evaluated your property boll, before and after proposed L.I.D. 314. on a preliminary basis for your advisory purposes only, and submit my conclusions herein. The purpose of this study is to assist you in objectively analyzing whether or not your prop,rty has any special benefits as a result of the L.I.D. and the possible monetary extent of those special benefits, If they are found to exist. I will describe the subject piopert,, and the L.I.D. and then evaluate the subject property both before the L.I.D. and after the L.I.D. Subject Property Description: The subject property is a rectangular tract which is located approx- imately two blocks north of the South 180th exit and SK 167, near the south city limits of Renton, Washington. The general area is south of I-405, west of SR 167 and east of 1-5. It is known as the north end of the Kent Valley, only because Kent is centrally located in the valley. More specifically, the West Valley Road and the East Valley Road each run north/south on either side of the valley, both proceeding south from I-405 on the north, all the way to Sumner on the south. The entire valley area has developed into an indus'rial and warehouse area because of its close proximity to Seattle, availability to rail and accessibility to freeways. Please see Exhibit A which is a vicinity sap indicating the subject property. Research &Valuation,Exclusively The subject property is located along the cast side of the East Valley �l Road, within the Renton city limits. Land uses in the area are light industrial, commercial near South 160th and transitional uses on unimproved land awaiting development. Both the Burlington Northern, Renton 11 and the Orillia Industrial Parks are along the vast side of East Valley and across iron the subject property. The subject site has 324.48 feet of frontage on East Valley Road and has an average depth of 545 ft., all lying vest of the SR 167 and contains Approximately 186,001 sq. ft. or 4.27 acres, according to the King County Department of Assessments. The total site includes Tax Lot 90 in Section 30 Township 23 N Range 5 E.W.M. Please refer to Exhibit R which is a subject site mp. The tract is level and approximately at street grade with East V411ey Road. The site west of SR 167 is zoned LI, which is a Renton light industrial zone. Available utilities include a 12" water mein which is in East Valley Road along the east boundary and a 12" sewer main which Sy a 21 ft. went of the centerline of East Valley Road. Public power and telephone are also available. East Valley Road is an approximately 26 foot wide paved, two-lane road with gravel shoulders. Current taxes and assessed valuation are $1.733.46 for taxes slid $186,500 for assessed value. with $176,700 being allocated to land. The subject improvements are not described because they do not appear to impact our findings. They do include a construction shop, a fenced equipment yard and a small office type facility. The subject is used for an excavating equipment yard with all improvCroents appearing to be in reasonably good condition. The L.1.D.: An L.I.D. is short for Local improvement District which is a special assessment district that is established to collect property assessment$ which pay for public improvements that directly benefit the district properties. It is based upon the Revised Code o1 Washington, RCW 35.43,010 through -, 35.56.190, The city is to lmpartiall" ind etiM ably determine the amount to charge each property owner based upon the special benclit received. (3S.43.040.042) (35.44.010) Special benefit& are those benefits which accrue direct'U, solely and peculor ily to the advantage of the subject property. These benefits are distinguished from general lenefits which are those benefits which arise f-,m the fulfillment of the public object which justified the L.I.D., .uch as the enjoyment of the tacilities provided by the L.I.D. and from the increased general pr.,sperity o1 the community as a result. Special benefits are generally thought of as being measured by an increase in property value at least equal to or in excess of the proposed L.I.D. assessment. It may also povide & utility that wag not previously available making the land more saleable or developable; it may reduce the cost to connect to an available utility due to proximity; and/or ; u it may provade or create special ingress and egress or change the probable highest and beat use and therefore change or enhance the land value. These are all examples of special benefits tc ■ property. Methods ti.at can be used the the city to assess the property specially benefited can be referred to as the zone termini method, square footage method, front frontage method, unit method or a combination of the above methods. The subject L.I.D. 314 includes improvements to streets, water, sever and storm drainage in the area from S.W. 16th to S.W. 43rd Street in a n,rthlsouth direction and from East Valley Road on the east to Lind Avenue and Longacres Parkway on the west. Along East Valley Road and specitically near the subject ty, street lights, a six foot concrete sidewalk, curbs, a wideneC. .ad and a 36 inch storm drain system will be installed. Please refer to Exhibit C for a visual depiction of th-. subject site improvements, &a reflected by Jones and Associates, Engineers. It currently would be difficult to ascertain what, if any, special benefits the subject site would have as a result of the L.I.D. Sidovalks are not needed when no pedestrian tr.,ffic exists. The wider road would appear to be a general benefit to the larger c ,,,unity in as much as existing development does not fully utilize the current road. The curb* are a function of the storm drains and gutter system. The storm drainage could be a benefit when the area is fully developed. However, the extra- ordinarily large storm drain pipe, which increases in site from south to north is obviously very expensive and would appear to have a carrying capacity much la•„sr then needed for the subject and adjoining property. M___ It would thus appear to be primarily for the large vacant properties al. 4 the seat side of East 'alley Road, which are low and wet and have a disEc age problem, which when developed would cause a neighborhood storm ♦lots problem without the new storm drain system. it would appear to 1K questionable as to whether the storm drain is a special or general benefit. The street lights would appear to provide for general safety but the type of development in the area, namely vacant land and light industrial uses, do not generate much traffic or pedestrian need for street lights at hours when it is dark. It certainly could not be specifically construed to be a special benefit to the subject property Just because it lights the sidewalk and street. The subject site already has access to sever, water and a paved road, all of which are adequate for the legal and permissible use of light industrial for which the subject property is zoned and used. Subject Property Evaluation Before and After L.I.D.,: In order to ascertain if the current market would recognize a special benefit in the fore of increased vat.e to a site for sidewalks, a wider street, street lights and storm drainage in light industrial zoned land when compared to a similar site with adequate onsice storm drain retention, sanitary sever, water, paved streets but no curbs, sidewalks or storm drain system, I have analyzed and compared two types of market evidence. on type includea tracts representing the After L.I.D. 314 situation, namely improved industrial park sites. This mould somewhat represent the After or specially henefi- ' value since all the L.I.D. 314 character- istics are in place. The other type includes tracts wherr water. sever, and paved road emiated but no curbs, sidewalks, street li or storm drainage system eaisleu. which basically represents the befw:e I..I.D. 214 situation. I have analyzed random land sales which h+ve occurred from 1979. 1980, 1981 and 1992 in the two townships of 22 and 23 and the two ranges of 4 and 5. This encompasses the area from south Keno to Renton and Includes the Tukwila area. The study included 49 total saivs, all which hr•e occurred in the area, 14 of which were in platted industrial parks with facilities similar to After the L.I.D. 314 value and the 15 reaaina.r were in unplatted ireas, where curbs, sidewalks and street light, did not directly relate or were available to the sale property. The following tabulations indicate each of the fnur township and ranges and the mean findings of each: J 22-4 Location Sale Acre Sale *Before seat ter S/T/R Date Site Price Price Plat Price Pd./SF Zoning P4,/SF Naw�1. So. 285th 4 Valley Freeway 36-22-4 2/82 2.5 At. 2• S. 221st L 63th So. $ 185,000 $1.70 M1 12-22-4 2/82 2,7 3. 76th S. 6 S. 2(:nd 177,721, 1.51 M2 1-22-4 2/82 0.3 4, West Valley 6 So, 212th 000 2.65 M• 12-22-4 5/82 15.1 5. N. 4th 6 So. 230th 1,746.000 55482 2.93 M1 6, S. 228ch 6 6200 Blk 12-22-4 )/B1 4.2 585.345 2.51 M2 7, West Valley 4 S, 188th 14-22-4 12/81 2p 2,185,365 2,51 MA 2-22-4 I/80 S. 19230 68th S. 1,637.22.5 M2 1-22-4 1/81 6 9. 72nd S. a S. 206th 749.315 2.87 M1 1+-22/4 1/81 27.1 10. S. 196th a 58t1 P1. S. 2-22-4 11/80 7.5 3,350,000 M1 $2.84 Daon Addn. 11. S, 212th a West Valley Rd. 11-22-4 800,660 2,49 MI 12. 6200 Blk S. 212th 1/81 37.9 2,600,D0p 1.Si M1 11-22-4 12/80 5 17. 212th a West Valley Highva 337,860 1.55 MA Y 12-22-4 11/80 9 14. 191 19500 6 66th So. 747.655 1.91 MA 2-22-4 2/81 15.2 3.004.38G 1S. S. 194th 6 62nd S. M1 4.54 S.C.2/22-4 5/81 6,5 Corp. 16. 22141 West Valley Highway 11-22-4 934,243 M1 3.30 ^ •• I). 62nd S, 6 S. '94th 5/$1 2 175.000 2.00 M1 i-27-4 4/81 18. S. 196th 6 62nd S. 3 446,660 2-22-4 7/81 9.6 3.42 S.C. Corp, 19. S. 212th 4 West Valley Highway 12-22-4 1,423,212 M1 3.40 20 N 6th 6 S. 228th 8/81 4.1 545,%1 13-22-4 I'� � 21. NEC 72nd S. 6 S, 228ch 6101 2.2 296,235 MI 13-22-4 ,81 2. 3.09 Rent Valley 22. S. 212th a 7100 Elk 2 320.558 NI 3.35 23. S. 212th Were valley Mighve 633,733 2.78 M1 Y 12-22-4 12-22-4 6/81 5.4 6/81 11.6 1.306.666 1-5-9a Unplatted rapr,-. nts Before L.I.D. 314 chareeterlacles to Platted represents After L.I.D. 314 characteristics MEAN $ 2.14/af $ 3.42/a.f. 23-4 •Before •*After Sale .crc Sale Price Price Plat Location S/T/R Date Sire Price Pd.ISF Zoning Pd./SF Name 1. SEC Todd 6 Cascade 36-23-4 4/82 5.9 1,001,858 M2 $3.90/lsf S.C. Indus Park 2. NWC West Valley 6 Strander 25-23-4 5/82 7 5)8,658 $1.96 M1 3. Monster Rd/1400 blk 24-23-4 11/81 70.000 2.59 LI Berton 4. Southcenter Blvd., 1600 blk 24-23-4 8/79 7.5 800,000 2.45 M1 S. E. side 68th S., 100 blk 25-23-4 5/80 10.6 1,464,000 J.17 CM 6. 60 S. 4 S. 190th 36-23-4 4/80 3.1 200,875 M2 1.49 BN NorPac Ind. ➢1st. Di 7. SW 43rd 6 e0th S. 36-23-4 11/60 11.2 1,425,000 M2 2.92 Div. 2 8. S. 190th 6 W. Valley 35-23-4 11/80 19.8 2,370,695 MI 2.75 S.C. Corp. Park 9. 3900 blk 6 West Valley 25-23-4 3/81 5.8 568,000 2.25 MP 10. So. 190th 4 62nd South 36-23-4 6/81 2.1 273,657 M2 2.99 MEAN 2.48/sf 2.81/sf • Unplatted represents Before L.I.D. 314 characteristics `• Platted represents After L.I.D. 314 characteristics 23 *Before **After Sale Acre Sale Price Price Plat Location S/7'/R Date Site Price Pd./SF ton Ann Pd./SF Nam 1. SW loth 6 Grady 19-23-5 2/82 1.16 Ac. 235,350 $4.66 MP Renton 2. SW 27th 6 E. Valley Road - S.W.C. 30-23-5 2/82 4.3 288,000 L1 Renton $1.54 3. N side SW 12th - W. of Seneca 19-23-5 3/82 .56 54,000 5.37 L1 4. SW 27th 6 Lind/East Valley 10-23-5 12/81 38.2 3,314,882 1.99 Ll 5. HE 3rd 6 2900 blk 16-23-5 ;2/81 2.09 300,000 3.30 LI 6. SW 29th 6 Lind 30-23-5 12/81 8.4 750,000 HP 2,05 . 18441 East Valley 31-23-5 4/80 3.7 280,000 1.74 M2 8. 18400 East Valley 31-23-5 5/80 3.6 503.588 3.21 ML 9. 18441 East Valley Highway 31-23-5 6/80 3.2 298,790 2.14 M2 10. 3400 Elk - East Valley Highway 30-23-5 5/81 5 3E:,948 1.68 L1 11. Lind S.W. 6 Grady 19-23-5 5/81 1 174,240 4.00 ?¢ 30'aN $ 3.12 $1.80 a Unplatted represents Before L.I.D. 314 characteristics ** Plotted represents After L.I.D. 314 characteristics 2` J L�catlin S�R Sale Acre °eafore 1 Wte Sale• e. side Bdth S. Si7° Price at 9600 blk Price Po,/SP 6-22-5 ioni S/BO 13 Be. 1,300 OOo 2, 8eth S. c 20600 elk $1.96 M2 6-22-5 9/81 2 1 352,808 3' 90t') 61k of 5. 3.86 M2208th 6-22-5 7181 S �• 20280 rid 84 th S. 500,000 2.30 M2 6-22-5 9/81 2.3 239,760 2.39 M2 mw $2.63/■,f, � "Platted represents eefore L.I,C, 316 characteristic, A summary of this data, utilizing mean values because of the quantity of 1 data, indicates that the 35 sales most like the xubject situation Before L.I.D. 314 indicates a mean unit value range per sq. ft. of $2.59/s.f. or $481,743 for the subject 186.001 sq. ft. site. The 14 sales most like the subject site After L.I.D. 314, and specially benefited to approximately the same extent, reflects a mean unit value of $2.66/s.f. or $494.763 for the subject 186,001 sq. ft. site. Mean velues were also used because no clear cut market difference could be found between fully developed and partially developed industrial land. The four townships and ranges studied reflect from a low mean of $2.14/s.f. to a high of $3.121s.f. for unplatted or pre L.I.D. 31, values and from a low of $1.80/s.f. to a high of $3.42is.f. for platted or After L.I.D. 314 values. In Township 23 Range 5 which is the subject area, the unplatted sales exceed the platted sales in value. In Township 22 Range 4 and Townshtp 23 Range 4, the platted values exceed the unplatted value. In Township 22 Range 5, no platted sales existed. The difference reflected is $13.020 so even though no or minimal special benefits are visually apparent, the market dues appear to reflect that ■ special benefit does exist but to a much lesser extent than the city claims to exist. The difference between thr market evidence special benefit and the city assessment estimate for the subject site would appear to be in the sub- lal amount of administrative costs in the project, which amount to 372 of the construction cost, much of which would appear to be attributable to those properties vest of East Valley Road which is where a majority of the L.I.D. is and properties are which appear to be receiving Um greatest special and general benefits of the project. Also, many items appear to be oversized to be of a sole and peculiar benefit only to the subject site. They appear to be designed for capacities anticipated as a result of the several major Industrial parks on the vest side of East Valley Road and beyond. Thus, they do not appear to be a special benefit to the subject property except in an indirect way. Thus, it would appear that your property has a special be i[ of from $13.000 to perhaps a maximum of $20,000, as a result of I.D. 314. � If you have any questions, please let me know. Yours ve THE NO ASS ATES Roland J oefer, M.A.I. IUH:dr CITY OF RENTON NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING f�- t. p�yna�clr+ RENTON CITY COUNCIL RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING COUNCIL CRAMSE95, 8:00 P.M. JUNE 4. 1994 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON REVISED FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR LID 314 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Final Assessment Roll for Local Improve- meet District No. 314, East Valley Road, has been revised and is on file to the office of the City Clerk. In accordance with City of Renton Ras- olution No. 2283, amended by Resolution No. 2299, creating and establish- ing Local Improvement District No. 314, seal with City of Renton Ordinance NO. 3396, ordering construction of the Project, roadway improvements cave been constructed, and include installation of sanitary savers, water main, fire hydrants, curbs, gutters, sidewalks, street lighting and all necessary apPurtenances in the vicinity of East Valley Highway and S.W. 16th St. from SR 167 ramp northerly and westerly to Lind Avenue S.W. SAID ROLL HAS BEEN sat for hearing .t a regular setting of the Rent<,. City Council on June 4, 1984, at 8:00 p.m. All persona who object to said assessments, or any part of them, say file written objections with the City Clerk at of prior to the rise and date of the hearing, At the time fixed for hearing objections to the confl-MOLlon of the ses- assment roll , and at the times to which the hearing, may be adjourned, Cho Council sits as a Board of Equalization and may correct, revive, raise, lover, change, or modify the roll or any part thereof , or set aside the roll and order the asseassent to be de novo, and at the con- clusion thereof , confirm the roll by ordinance. REVISED TOTAL FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL LID 314: $7 ,056.579.90 Name of Owner A Descrietion of Real Estate Amount of Assessment Mortgage Company CITY OF 4ENTON matins otor City Clerk Renton Record Chronicle Date* o' Inblication: May 11 . 13, 14. 15. 16. 1984 CRANE, $TAMPER ROESE, DUNHAM At ROGERS C.3W "so CkWMA1 oM ta9 PM nv 10 ffvep (IAVt staTa Wwisrans 9/mi WNW ��O�Oy�GpW5 M.N. ^RM Si m SIN C m m C.Wl.IMpLF %nx,6 `OKM""' April 17, 1984 Cl IN Ii-LiTCON Mr. Don Monahan PVNUC tion"Dwr. Public Works Department i,-��- City of Rentonl Municipal Building 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 Re LID 314 A-R 23 1G84 Dear Mr . Monahan: This letter is a follow-up to the oral request made by the undersigned at the public hearing on LID 314 on April 9, City Attorney Larry Warren has directed that my request be made specifically to you for a response as soon as possible. Specifically, our office requests the following information be made available to us for inspection and/or copying: 1. All studies , reports, notes , sales data and other documents and wrltings which have been or may in the future be prepared or reviewed by Ralph Giibo, the appraiser retained by the City to determine the "special benefits ' purportedly to accrue to properties lying within LID 314 (including but not limited to special benefits alleged to ace,ue to Pace and to "lonnathan's Storage", a mini-storage facility one mile south of Pace): 2. All studies, reports, notes and other documents and writings relative to LID 114 which were prepared or reviewed by the City Engineering or Puhl 'c Works Department; 3. All studies, reports, notes, and otter documents and writings relative to all costa associated with construction of LID 114, categorized as to the various components (e.g. , roadway improvements on Fast Valley Highway vs. storm Mr. Don Monahan Page 2 April 18, 1984 water improvements vs. roadway improvements related to all other portions of the LID vs. sewerage-related improvements); and 4. All studies, reports, notes and other documents and writings relative to LID 314 which have bean or may in the fixture be prepared or reviewed by the City, its employees and consultants pertain- ing to the calculation of special benefits both as a whole and as to each individual parcel that will purportedly accrue as i result of the com- pleted improvements, including but not limited to correspondence and reports received from property owners within LID 314 and/or their agents. You will note that our requests are conttin�uinit In nature, involving a request that our office be advfseT as soon as additional information is developed relative to the various subject matters addressed above. Thank you. Very truly yours, CRANE, S7 'ER,.BOESE, UUNNAM & ROGERS l S� h� : � r SJC:vey / CC: Paul Smith Larry Warren 6301C OF RF ti 0 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT j!R-F z DFSIGN 'UTILITY ENGINEERING • 235-26.31 MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE.SO. RENTON,WASH.E11106'5 e P rED SEPSE BARBARA Y. SHINPGCH MAYOR May 2. 1984 Cascade Septic Service, Inc. P.O. Box 44010 Tacoma, WA 98444 Attention: Mr. Mark Perry Re: L.I.O. No. 314 Dear Mark: As you are aware, we have TV'd some additional sewer lines on East Valley Road in order to compare their condition with those lines mentioned in my letter of February 22, 1984. The condition of the first run down stream was as bad as the lines in question; however, the remaining lines we.e in better con- dition than the lines in question, but r ' significantly better. As a result of this review, it does not appear as if the deteriorated condition of the lines in question could con- clusively be attributed to your actions. Therefore, this matter will not be pursued any further. If you have any questions, please advise. Very truly yours, Donald G. Monaghan, P.E. Design Engineer ;jft r OF RF c; y. z PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT g DESIGN.'UTILITY ENGINEERING0 pie.y63l _ F MUNICIPAL BUILDING 100 MILL AVE SO. RENTON.WASH.BBOBB e CEO SC PEE�P BARBARA r, SHINPOCH MAYOR April 23, 1984 Preston, Thorgrimson, Ellis E Holman 2000 IBM Building Seattle, MA 98111 Attention: Mr. Brian J. Ratner Re: L.I.D. No. 314 Dear Mr. Ratner: In response to your letter of April 11, 1984 to Mr. Larry Warren, Please find enclosed the information requested. The reproduction cost for said material is $33.78 which includes tax. If I can be of any further assistance, please advise. Very truly yours, Donald G. Monaghan, P.E. Design Engineer :jft Enclosure 3. The engineering costs, as well as all costs, were distributed based upon a S iructi0n costs. the Other administrative by the total constrhe total admini Percentage of actual asses Construction costs LlstrdtivB cost, we con- s tr sod against a parti roes the constr re divided ative cost assessed cular parcel to deconstruction cost construction and adminis9dinit that a the admini- assessment, t ative Parcel. The total of the assessments equaled the total S All financing was done Dy Peoples .4ational loans were issued. Bank, no inter-fund Phase Dates issued Amo�gt Interest (merest $D ai il/80 - 6/81 Adttd--- s 02 12/8) 60,337 e e 8,49% 9/82 )60,000 621 peoples Quarterly 03 9/82 . Present 4,886,539 Total Prime71.6t Peoples Quarterly $6.296,876 prime 9. Schedule "A" consisted of that portion f S.W. gist St. north to Station 67rpp Channel area. Schedule ° East Valley Road from itch in the P. -.C.' consisted Just north of the P-g Ave. 5,p. 9 Channel area between of cleaning and shaping Schedule '8" consisted of all Valle 9 a the project. Schedule the retrainingy Road and tied the work in hlot c nb d tofpthe�tM B•P'At lava rd eofntcon ete fpa ement bid WhvIch ersus alternates. contract being based upon of RFC G OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY• RENTON WASHINGTON U •'�' Z .oa•a..0•a aw ae t t a•.at• • +++w• rr..we•a. not• »a aan Y C � r LAWRENCE 7 WARREN c.. +•.a•+e• DANIEL KECLbGG, ••rt••rn 61+••+w• Pb DAYID M DEAN •1YV.wr a..•o•pnt• MARK E BARBER, •a*%. , c++•*•oat• QED SE•`a ZANETTA t rONTES. •auar.wr u•.••ror,a. April 16, 1984 MAR—HA A 'RENCH.•aba•. • u•.•••o•t. T0. Don Monaghan FROM: Lawrence J. Warren. City Attorney RE. LID d314 Dear Don Please respond to the enclosed information as soon as possible. If you have any questions , please do not hesitate to give me a call . �LJ� Lawrence J.f rren L.R. nd Encl. cc Mayor ur onnc[+ e. 1'st[STON, TNORORIMSON, ELLIS 6 HOLMAN wu+«+•e« l c oo•o +si rw+ [NM«l +l..Tl[.•M+N,NOfON N. ta.riU+VrT«M+G L{ryil\ N U.«OT« OC IOOOr Ta..Ori no\W+•oo TN..e«e so.,+.+lr+oo •nr[wwe\\e. .no- s.Nu. nwNsw T,scon. uoo \u••ou mace.•nor uer. roN+u«o ♦Nc.e.wr .Ninety i.,.l\.+.Y« sue+••« a.... «e°e:ia uiii io ADril 11 1994 wnu«o oN[oo..+Tw �ttlN.p«i I+en[NN+ Ti[co.•�ea W�OOI Mr. Larry warren 100 South Second Street PO Box 626 Renton, WA 9805" Re: LID 314 Dear Larry: The purpose of this letter is to request additional information from the City concerning LTD 314. Attachee is a list of information needed. we emphasize the importance of - tem 1 , a breakdown of the final assessment roll between water, sewer and road assessments. This information is necessary to enable us to determine how our client's parcels have been assessed compared to similarly situated parcels. we want to aoain emphasize our client's d=sire to coop rate with the City and reach an understanding concerning the final assessment roll. We want to thank you for your efforts it securing a continuance of the public hearing. We are interested in meeting with you concerning the roll. Once we have the information necessary, we will onlv need a few days to examine it, and will then contact you to set up a meeting. As I rentioned in our phone conversetion today, I will be out of the office next week. Please contact Clyde Summerville if you have any questions regarding our request for information, or anything else to do with this matter. Very truly yours, PRESTON, THORGRIMSON, ELLIS i HOLMAN By Brian J. Ratner BJRlald (' 'Cd N-131 � LIST OF INFORMATION RS IRED FRCP THE RI '31 4 1. Breakdown of final assessment roll between water, sewer, and road assessments. 2. Breakdown of construction costs. 3. Breakdown of _engineering costs for water, sewer, and road. 0. Areakdown o administrative expenses by individual items of expense and dotes over which expenses were incurred. 5, Areakdown of interim financing and interest; sources of fiancing lincluding interfund loans, if any) , interest ratels) paid, method of determining interest and dates of determining interest, 6. Copies of each offer to purchase warrants from Peoples National bank, and ordinances, resolutions cnd other correspondence reflectinq actions by the City relatinq to interim financing. 7. Records of outstanding warrants issued, date of issuance, warrant numbers, amounts, and to whom issued. S. Table or chart showing the differences in parcel numbers between the final assessment roll and the preliminary roll. As an alternative, please supply a map listing the current parcel numbers. 9, explanation of schedule "A", "8", alternative 08" and "C", which are listed in the engineer's estimate of bids. 4/10/84 To: Dick Houghton From: Maaine Motor Re: LID 314 Daily Record Chronicle article: Bills for LID draw complaints 411D184 AY PAT JENKINS LID a a a Saaft Itt"Ontr In words ths'. v ,, probabi, milder duminued,aid gars All wnsse a ,m<nta decreased, m dunwhatthe)'ve used mprvvatr,uveral II3k and pronn ya Or ",storm)' cludme Crant, n emdown gl,I l Ago qxt and k toel4y a Since it future, rmma Sieve) m.n.vaireh us fur the AQ propery owner t, t Remon Offhe bill, dales be d to 14`i Some nn forma Fjo Val min ad, ""lux a en-" they've hat they INN of the Local nun,mr mprov menten OO:% ve Faat propoleysed Road, aid hta hen-" W le,proeetcot Distrnw'u:rldtesmlacal uryWy ne,pmvudinga wuhm a, fuel pmpns$1 tauaameat of dI Imptring a public hearing 314 of souOns, mdwSmg tr ratenvhe remind from fl,u,pon was reduced 1 Dunne a bin uNntle conducted by n( escrewest tTU SINet m the percent fmm in original figure A the Ramon vi al".Coun t.tourgoll of Set ormicre,famseraceneck.dm.nn aampolo{mtstwet<hnux"firer$ nn the l.lit* land owners , t roll of per V.ileunn of lam Sheet from road at rival al low re street"had us Areal mdlmn Ian landowner a there rests Vnllry Road e• Idol Avenue. raeJ mein lowered nt percent ID a final the LID racomplarnedthen portions by'he loicrvnemssucbasndewa{MswA reopened amount ofa,w5 ao the LID roll art unjust as proposed Mite ertttrra.and storm amt samtary,row tThat)&% rani meal mil raid. since d' rr maton nnnx inhe,sasnrntserforgmrodta bow "LuSmnws' and "dens,+<," were RrmOm now t,n ' ,ah In be<nmpareblr for pmpenrca or amen`the words user'by those protest tin bill,fowl parrvla o1 Ian,• inn um jar mcation and OR Further ,ne the asseasmrne the LIDO,ben III area more, he O,,d. A Fennomy nlmady After gernng an earful.elWtt,It memb Amino the property owner•vino had ar didn't need wine of the ers voted to continue the hear ne In Mt3 clam the hill,are tin high ,Gal Improvement,twou&by LID 314 City A lortny Larry Warren aid the field Aswmules,a wanMuse truck Altneether eig' nwrI of pro, prig hearing will give protr,ters ,no III in it Jp)SN' Nth St far pert) within the LID have filed the ibonaI time wnteol them request held', murneY. WoodrowTayl:,r. formal pmtenta Theo _umulalwe ed to build their case, mid 'te enuncd that a pPehmmRy a,seaamenn amrtum t<.'per;em of LID 314..110 Public Works Dlnctor assessment of WOO, In Ieg3 has the total roll IS,,LID.page A31 linen In 11W.0do no Intl latent pm- Any roll reuucnnns granted fnr raised roll He called the increase landowner,wnI warn them will h 'ludtcrou• in companwn wish the fell by Other property owner, A, e sausam Io$ fnr Oliver land m 'Sr mmmy r hyoprd from wine assess LID Some of the eeaea,ment,nn mean, others"owriviii wmlld be later pngwrtur ,he amd hove been raved.Warren mud reduced dranatiplh Ifs up to Its council to deade Mt Taylor cued atverel pmpeetn, etacr aayimmems,it any,he added Mevv a OfhCe _ _4-1 CITY OF RENTON (datel INTER-DEPARTMIENTAL ROUTING SLIP �1 C� NOu 4.kri e err to) irefeuad bvl __. Please Prepare reply for the Mayor s signature on Mayor s of ics stat,onery Please reply to the atacheu letter for tLe M:vor. showing a copy to the Mayor Please sunply n,r w,th the ISCts mvalved m the attached letter __FwWerned for yovr iMormabon, please return Forwarded --for vm, information a`nd4,4e other'' t St m+ l4lVt�O. C Cf�W Action requested no later than ate April 3, 1984 � i r I [he Honcrable Barbara Shinpoch Havor • City of Renton 21. i 9. l: .4,enue South '.A 98055 RE: Objection to Proposed Assessment - L.I.O. 314 Dear Mayor Shinpoch: Superior Fast Freight received its Itotice of Public Hearing on L.I .D. 314 on March 16, 1984, at our Los Angeles offices. That notification was forwarded to our regional office in Renton the same day, making aete that our assessment had risen $14.444.95 over the ,,no received and protested in June of 1982. Prior to the hearing to 1982, the office- of Oe Engineer and Clerk, Citv of Renton, were visited By a representative of our company. He was gdvisud that approximately fifteen feet of Superior's sasturr. ,,ioncrty line fell within the 600 foot assessment rights of the city. Considering such a small portion of our propetty falls within the assessable area, it is hard to rationalize. let alone visualize, what benefits we would gain as a -exult of this L.I.D. since fifteen feet on the east portion of cur property line only encompasses our fence line and landscaped property border. Improvements identical to those required by L.I.U. 114 were completed on our property at the time of initial construction as A requirement for issuance ..f our Certificate of Occupancy. Following is a list of the improveaerre require,i and completed, costs incurred, and the cost of :.I.D.'s (i .e. 302) that were assessed against us. a " - -^ . -�r•o• A±aika• ltir,!rrn Ca»ada from kovrhrm t JFdnrnra+nd Arranaa The Honorable Barbara Shinpoch April I, 1994 Fage Two u A. Assessment of 5121,904.69 under L.I .V. 302 for improvement of South-est 34th, South 41st and Lind Avenue. ThLs assessment covtred the same basic improvements as re- qui-ed by L.I .D. 314. except Lind is the primary arterial route used by our companv. B. ',rater main and fire nydrants -- Installed at a cost of S411178.66. A latecomer's agree- ment wak approvedt however, Superior has Only regained a email portion of that installation r'SC. C. Curbs, gutters and aldewalka -- As identified below; I. Lity sidewalk, curbs, and gutters were installed on Southwest 34th, including asphalt pavit,g at rtttroad tracks and instatl.atfot of a drainage catch bnain (S3,564,00) . -. City sidewalk, curbs and gutters were installed on Southwest 29th, L'ie northern border of Sunerior's property D. Catch basins with pumps — Two catch basins we: required as a part of initial construction to retain all run-off from industrial wash predwats used an our equipment. (Cost - initial construction cost cannot be segregated) . F. Oil separator tank -- Baffled hold'.ng tank requlaed at the maiutenauce shop to coile,,t anv oils or debris from our steam cleaning area. This tank is cleaned semi-annually to comply with F,tro Induarrlal Caste discharge limitations. (coat 1' Sanitary severe -- All sewers and st,orm d.atns were installed conforciag to all requirements let forth by Washington Standard SrOetficat ens as approved by the City of Renton. The Honorable Barbara Shinpoch April 3, 1984 Page Three Ae one of the first companies tc recognize the f - .ntial of the valle. area, Sups. or Fast FreiRht, as well as others, have bore the cost of most of Che initial improvements in our area. To date, these fore- going assessments have been paid without protest, realizing that for our industrial community to grow, we must bear some responsibility for the :z,ts of improvements; however, the tine must be drawn somewhere. Perhaps there was %one justification for Inpreving Southwest Ihth Street to Lind Avenue; however, its impact on our businuss is highl, quest),,nable sinoe Lind Avenue and Southwest 180th have been our main traffic routes for cars based on dispatch routing ro the majority of our cust( iaors. It is our request that out aysessmert e dropped or at a minimum re-evaluated downward, l:asrd on our distance from the improved road network, it:; lack of henef icfal Impact as an access route to our c.,mpany. and the amount of funds we have alreadv extended for site ind area im- pro-ement. In the va lv< SUPERIOR FAST FK'c r..HT. Te rf' R. F'r each Ccrporate staff Manager TRF:pf cc: S. D. Knopp 1). L. Castro b. E. Potter J. E. Carl CITY Or RENTON LOCAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. 314 - PUBLIC HEARING APRIL 9, 1984 East Valley Road From S.N. 16th to S.N. 41st & Related Streets Road Paving, Curbs, Sewers, Water and Storm Sewers Amount of Property Owner Assessment Valley Office $1 ,247 ,256.39 & Ind . Park, Inc. Glacier Park Co. 985,780.92 Broadacres, Inc. 950.558.27 Puget Sound Power 655 .528.06 & Light Company Burlington Northern, Inc. 653.342.48 City of Renton 50U,580.56 Harper a Tripp 304,' %I .92 Mobil Oil Corportion 240,814.25 Garfield Is Associates, Lta , 195,625.84 BEMP Associates 135,066 .16 Gary Merlino Const. Co. 132,024 .89 Prudential Ins. CO. 118,201 .74 Martin Selig 102.575.51 Paco In",.strisl Group 100,754.96 Washington Jockey Club 86,414 .39 Harper. J. F . 67 ,642.97 a Tripf , J . W. Hawk ,;oint Owners 45,243.54 Magnuson, N. A. 43.286.23 Amount or Property Owner Assessment Hardebeck, Jerry L. 42,58o,21 Olympic Pipe? ine Co. 38,649.36 Jonathans Renton Partnership 35 .015.74 Kohl , Delores (Ms.) 11 .526.50 Craig Taylor Equipment Co. 31 ,412.68 Allenbach, Herman M. 25,716.95 Knopp-Castro Orilla 23,755.53 Dave a Swede's Service ZZ,5Z7,05 Bailey , P . G. 22.495 .15 A Monnahan, R. F. Younker, Sam Z0,472.66 Davis, Charles W. 19,105.10 a .�amela A. Pierotti , Emilio 16,866.61 Younker, Rhonda 13,678.76 Seattle Eye Bldg. Corp, 12 ,825.12 Robert S. MacGregor 10,276 .11 McIntyre, Patricia An 'i 9.133.23 Morrison, J. E . 6.682.93 Shorten, Ltu, 5,339.44 Powers, Frank 6 John 15,Y74,S4 Cook , Walter L, 4 .109.95 Cook , W. L, 3,911 .9q Thomas R. Dahlby 2 .290.33 Sexton, Robert J. 1 ,422.68 TOTAL $5 ,969,113.r.0 C d5C0tlf' sephr se"Ico Inc 096T z ti V W March 1, 1964 l Don Monaghan City of Renton Municipal Building 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 RE: LID 314 February 22, 1984 letter Dear Don: We dispute the statement that the settlement of the sanitary sower is a result of our construction. The settlement could have been caused by any number of things including poor foundation or the increased load from the improvements. I have previously asked to have in writing the specifics on how we damaged the lines. May this letter serve as a formal request for these specifics. There are certain other items in the letter that need to be clarified. First o ,.11, Ed made no statement that the weight of the t�ckhoe was the cause of the problem. He simply sated that as one possibility. In your letter you make the statement that Martin based these conclusions on actual observations which were in turn co,7veyed to Ed and Steve. Steve was not involved with the storm during the period from August 3, 198t to August 16* 1981 when this portion of the pipe was installed. Even if come of the settlement had been caused from escaping pea gravel, the area of the settlement, even in the farthest imagination, would not exceed 10' . Most of the settlement areas that you show exceed this. Our DPR's indicate that in some areas we did see the sanitary but Martin and Ed talked about replacinq tha pea gravel, which was done. We did not see pea gravel in anywhere near the number of times indicated in your letter. The existing tapes are so foggy that you cannot tell if there was any settlement. How old are the tapes? We request the City to T.V. the rest of East Valley due to the unstaN a foundation of the construction area. Your letter makes no mention of the sanitary on 27th which you had previously thought we had damaged. Am I to assume that this has been settled? -z- There are toa many questions to be answered, therefore, we will not accept the responsibility of the repair work and we will not accept the addition of the t16,000.01 to the Punch List. We have tried to discuss this matte. with Martin and he said to talk to you. The easiest and the most rapid solution to this problem would be a meeting with you, Martin, Ed and myself, at your convenience. If I can oe of any further service, please contact me. Uly Y tuly 8R/ K R, RRY Vic.:- President MRP:kd OF RFC 1 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT q- 7 OESIGNNTILITY ENGINEERING • 235 2631 A' MUNICIPAL WILDING 200 WILL AVa $0 RLNT!1M,WAS" SUM b P rE0 SL v.E� BARBARA r. SHINPOCH February 22, 19M ' MAYOR Mr. hark Perry CASCADE SEPTIC SERVICE, INC. P.O. Box 44010 Tacoma WA 98444 Subject: Sanitary Sewer on East Valley Road Dear Mark: As you are awa"e, Martin and I have had some concerns regardina the grades of the sanitary sewer line on East Valley Road from the A-Economy mini- storage to the south. City crews have T.V.ed the southerly four runs of the northerly five funs which has revealed numerous sags of from 2' to 4" In depth as detailed on the attached list. These low areas were not in the line when is was T.V.ed immediately after it was originally installed. Ed is of the opinion, as expressed to Martin, that the weight of the backhoe digging the storm trench was the cause of the problem. Martin is of the opinion that distrubinq the sanitary sewer trench allowed the pea gravel bedding to shift or escape. Martin bases his conclusion; on actual obser- vation which in turn were conveyed to Ed and Steve at the actual time of installation. Therefore, thew areas which have settled as a result of your construction will need to be repaired as part of your clean up and will be added to the punch list at an estimated amount of $16,000. Very truly yours, Donald G. Monaghan, P.E. Design Engineer :ckd SANITARY SEWERS - EAST VALLEY ROAD From A•Economy to the South 12 to 13 - 145' - 175' - 2" - 2-1/2" 64+01 60+34 Run 362'1 F3 to 14 - 30' - 45' - 2" 2-1/1" 60+34 56+32 70' - 80' - 2-1/2" - 3" 110' - 125' - 2" 185' - 210' - 3" 4" 160' - 295' - 2" - 3" 345' - 355' - 2" Run 195't 14 to 05 - 10' - 32' - 2" - 2-112" 56+32 53+64 40' - 50' - 2" 2-1/2" 70' - 85' - 2" 100' - 106' - 2" 2-1/2" 130' - ISO' - 2" 185' - 225' - 3" 3.1/2" Run 2651 15 to 16 - 10' - 30' - 3" 3-1/2" 53+64 49+64 55' - 60' - 2" 70' , 92' - 2" 110' - 135' - 3-1/2' 160' - 200' - 2-1/2" - 3" 236' - 260' - 2" 775' - 295' - 1" - 2" 360' - 372' - 2" 372 (! 380' - 3-1/2" - 4") 390' . 2" ��,, i z � z� a � .� �T �. -J,j �� j _._ _L tom. �__. � ___..._..� �- ___ _.__,_. . _._._ �___._._ ._______�.__--_____,__.___.. _ r ..�.� r � <„ r- 1 c CRANE, STAMPER HOESE. DI,NHAM X ROGERS MT"cMm tt Iw li�i t cWwm"uv M GLMI Cvnw cN rKt PM "W I aa" SL"l WAwIM:"9110d �4m�4�cut!OV>•x"M ��y� 14y TriOta T A low Sahli*l 1 Y r 111.YlIJ LYSl W1Yti' 1 clxN `,V� April 3, 1984 Mr. Richard C. Houghton HAND UELIT'ERED Public Works Director City of Renton Municipal Building 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 Re: LID 314 / A-Economv Storage Facili Dear Mr, Houghton: Our office has been retained by Pace Industrial Group ("Pace"), owner of a 575-unit mini-storage facllit) known as A-Economy and located at 2233 East Valley Road, Pace has requested that we represent them concerning the proposed final assessment agdinst their property of $100,754.96 pursuant to LID No. 314. the purpose of this letter is to formally request that our office and Ms. Donna Hadfield, a legal assistant in our office, be allowed to inspert and copy (to the extent desired) all of the public records and writings possessed by the City of Renton (the "City") , its employees and consultants relative to LID 114. This request includes but is not limited to the following items; I. All studies, reports, notes, sales data and other documents and writings prepared or reviewed by Ralph Gilbo, the appraiser retained by the City to determine the "special benefit." purportedly to accrue to properties lying within LID 314 (including but not limited to special benefits alleged to accrue to Pace and to ".tchnathan's Storage", a mint-storage facility one mile south of Pace); 2. All studies, reports, notes and other documents and writings relative to LID 314 which were prepared or reviewed by the City Engineering Department and/or Donald Monahan; Mr. Richard C. Houghton Page 2 April 3, 1984 ^� 3. All studies, reports, notes, and other documents and writings relative to LID 314 which were prepared or reviewed by Jones and Associates relative to LID No. 314; 4. The con' -act or agreement for consulting services entered into between the City and Ralph Gilbo relative to LID 315, setting forth the scope of r_raices to be periormed by Mr. G1lbo and other terms and conditions of his employment; 5. All studies, reports, notes :nd other documents and writings relative to LID 3L4 which were prepared or reviewed by the City, its employees and consultants pertaining to the calculation of spacial benefits both as a whole and as to each individual parcel that will purportedly accrue as a result of the completed improvements, including but not limited to correspondence and reports received from property owners within LID 314 and/or their agents; and 6. All studies, reports, notes and other documents and writings relative to LID 314 which were prepared or reviewed by the City, its employees and consultants regarding LID 314 construction costs. Pursuant to the provisions of the State Public Records and Disclosure Act, Chapter 42.17 RCW, we expressly eequest that the above public records be made promptly available for inspection and copying by our office and our employee, Ms. Hadfield. In light of the public hearing set by the City of Renton for Monday, April 12, at 8:00 p.m. regarding LID 314. your prompt cooperation with this request is necessary (as well as legally required) in order for us to adequately prepare our testimony and presentation on behalf of our client. Mr. Richard C. Houghton Page 3 April 3, 1984 Thank you. Very truly yours, CRANE, STAMFER BOESE, DUNHAM & ROGERS S SJC:SLH CC: Larry Warren, City Attorney Paul B. Smith, Managing General Partner 6008C OF RFC i c� Z PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT .2 RICHARD C HOUGHTON • DIRECTOR MUNICI►AL BUIEgNti 300 MILE AVE.EO. RENTON,WASH.8EOb6 206 235 2569 k;P �rEO SEPt O'b BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYN April 3, 1984 Mr. Woodrow L. Taylor Attorney at Law 200 S.W. 34th St. Renton, WA 93057 Subject: L.I.D. No. 314 Assessments Dear Mr. Taylor: As requested in your letter of March 30, 1984, the enclosed list represents the responses to your questions regarding L.I.D. 314 of which your client, Garfield Associates, Ltd. , is a participant. If I can be of any further assistance, please advise. Very truly yours, Donald G. Moiaghan, P.E. Design Engineer DGM:jft Enclosure L.I.D. NO. 314 1. in 1982, the assessment roll for L.I.D. 314 was recomputed after the actual bids were received. The methods of assessment for each individual schedule were as follows: Water Zone Area Unit (ZAU) Sewer Square 400tage (Cost of Sewers less Sewer 'AU Cost) Zone Area Unit (Equivalent cost of an 8" sanitary sewer line across the frontage of the property) Street b Storm Square footage (40. of road and storm costs) Zone Front Footage (60t of road and Stom costs) Administration Administration was distributed at the same ratio as the parcel'•. .onstruction costs related to the total construction costs. 2. The 1964 assessment roll was distributed as follows: Water 8 Sewer Same method as 1982 roll Street b Storm based upon an appraisal by J. Ralph Gilbo, the properties east of Ea.t Valley Road and north of S.W. 16th St. appre- ciated one-third as much as the other properties in the LID; therefore• the cost for road and storm were distri- buted at the same ratio as the increase in value to the property. 3. See 2 above. 4. The actual rate assessment per square foot for the properties east of East Valley Road and north of S.W. 16th St. for street and storm is $0.17563399. The remaining parcels were assessed at the rate of $0.526917 per sq. ft. for street and storm iml rovements. 5. Partial copy of appraisal as requested was supplied April 3, 1984. 6. The reason the method of assessment was changed for the final assessa•.nt roll versus the preliminary assessment roll was because the preliminary assessments were unbalanced. in some instances, the preliminary assessment exceeded increased value of a property due to the improvements proposed to be inst. sled as part f the LID. 7. The method of assessment which was used for the preliminary assessment roll was discarded because it was found to be inequitable. 8. Copies of the preliminary and final assessment rolls are provided for your use. W10CC00W L. TAYLA-M WO a W 747 o sox aoo n[MTOw WA SM67 nuwwra 1rnw1 xa,.asr March 30, 1984 Mr. Dur "^naghan, Department of Engineering City of pe on Renton au,.irinal Building P 940bi Lkj+r r. 'oranhan: RI.: L:! Jl•. ".ssr.smenL for Lots 4 and 4. BLA. B.N. OR. 1ND. Pk.i Re^fog No. ! Per owr to l•,cor of tris date whereioi I inquired of you, of the basis of thr fi..al tk nt, cost figure for the move entitled property, owncn ov 'artic;< 'r.;oc Wos, Ltd., I request answer, to the following question.•, u 0,a',f of ,pry eli,.rt: 1) Concisely state the basis for the cnmoutation of the estima,ed revi;rc asses%n ni.s for the above-e,AiLled properties dateu Jur.s la, 1982. �! COni=r iy scat.( the basis for the ,.onputation of the final assessrr(rti for toe above-entitled properties dated April 5, f 34. 3; fe tear cstimatcu revised assessment compat.ations, two unit . nr mca,ur(,acnt wen used; i.e., zone front footage i60''.1 versus square footagc (4(1, ),. Is it correct i.,rat in r,TmuuJ!,q t;te final aSsessmects this method was abandoned and no tarsideratinn giver to whe"c r the assessed property fronted on the improvemert (roadways, etc.)? 4) is it true that the square foot assessarr,t. rate fur those assessed properties located east of East Valley Nf¢:.!sy is a uniform li cents n^r swuare foot vs. 5Z rents per square foot for all assessed property lifrtq we>t of the East Valley Hfghway, with re,pect to road and ,tore, sewer construction costs? 5) you advised G at an appraisal was perforaTed for the City by Ralph 5fabo co determine the incremental increase in value to L9e various assessec pr`1-c rties, arising solely by reason of LID ?14 improvements; a ,. it said appraisal indicated that a 40 . ; per square foot increase n value arose to all assessed property uniforr.:,y located on the east Side of the East Valley h•ghwa, vs. a 51.1?incremental increase in value uniformly to all assessed Prop(rrty located on the west side of East Valle, highway. ir. connectix, therewith, ,lease , ivis: ,idt particular March 30, 1984 City of Renton Page 2 continued properties were appraised and compared to determine this difference in incremental increase in value. 6) State the reasons for the City's change in its method of computing the final assessments from that used for the estimated revised assessments. 1, state the reason the City discarded the use of the frontage benefit method of determining increase in value. 8) Lots 4 and 9 final assessments are approximately 250% higher than the estimated revised assessment amounts. State the percentage i n:.rease or decrease in the amount of the final assessments vs. the revised estimated assessments of the assessed properties of the following owners-: a) Craig Taylor Fquipment Company b) Younker Motors Incorporated c) Glacier Park Co. (Burlington Northern Railroad) d) Seattle Northwest Securities Corporation e) T.* Austin Company f) fhe Boeing Airplane Company y) Incanco h` Olympic Pipeline Company Your prompt answer to tnese questions so that my client can be fully apprised prior tr hearing date (4/9/841 will be. greatly appreciated. Yours truly, G,��yr6t rfi (��"nte�L Woodrow L. Taylor Attorney for Garfield Associates, Ltd. Owners fo the Above Subject Property WLTlbf "a composite average increase or decrease figure may he used if owners have caryi_9 valued properties. l'o OF RF'v ,aryl 2 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT "� DESIGN/UTILITY ENGINEERING 235-2631 S MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE.SO. RENTDN,WASH.EEBEB pa �to moltoo SAIMARA Y. SHINPOCH MAVOR Marcr� 16, 1984 Mr. Jim Anderson Broadacres Inc. P.O. Box 60 Renton, WA 98057 Dear Mr. Anderson: Enclosed please find a copy of the Final Assessment Roll for L.I .D. 714 as requested. If 1 can be of any further assistance, please advise. Very truly yours, Donald G. Monaghan, P.E. Design Engineer :Jft Enclosure � 1T u f PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 22RDE SIGN%UT,LIIy I.N6!NfFRING • 235 2631 ' MUNICIPAL BUILDING 700 MILL AVE.E0. BENTON.INABM.EEOEE r �127 SE v,E e BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH February 22, 1984 MAYOR Mr. Mark Perry CASCADE SEPTIC SERVICE, INC. P.O. Box 44010 Tacoma WA 98444 Subject: Sanitary Sewer on East Valley Road Dear Mark: As you are aware, Martin and I have had some concerns regardina the grades of the sanitary Sewer line on East Valley Road from the A-Economy mini- storage to the south. City crews have T.V.ed the southerly four runs of the northerly five funs which has revealed numerous sags of from 2' to 4" in depth as detailed on the attached list. These low areas were not in the line when it was T.V.ed immediately after it was originally installed. Ed is of the opinion, as expressed to Martin, that the weight of the backhoe digging the storm trench was the cause of the problem. Martin is of the opinion that distrubing the sanitary sewer trench allowed the pea gravel bedding to shift or escape. Martin bases his conclusions on actual obser- vation which in turn were conveyed to Ed and Steve at the actual time of installation. Therefore, these areas which have settled as a result of your construction will need to be repaired as part of your clean up and will be added to the punch list at an estimated amount of $16,000. Very truly yours, Donald G. Monaghan, P.E. Design Engineer :ckd SANITARY SEWERS - EAST VALLEY ROAD From A-EcoaM to the South 02 to 13 - 145' - 175' - 2" • 2 1/2" 64+01 60+34 Run 362'1 03 to 04 - 30' - 46' - 2" - °-1/2" 60+34 56+32 10' - 80' - 2-112" - 3" 710' - 125' - 2" 185' - 210' - 3" 4" 260' 295' - 2" 3- 345' - 355' - 2" Run 395'* 04 to 05 - 10' - 32' - 2" 56+32 53+64 40' - So' - 2" 2-112" 70' - 85' - 2" - :-1/2" 100' _ 106' - 2" 2-1/2" 130' - 150' - 2" 185' - 225' - 3" Run 2651 05 to M6 - 10' - 30' - 3" 53+64 49+64 55' - 60' - 2" 70' - 82' _ 2„ 110' - 135' - 3-1/2" 160' - 200' - 2-1/2" - 3" 235' - 260' - 2" 275, - 295' - 1" . 2" 360' - 372' - 2" 372 (p 380' - 3-1/2" - 4"j 390' . 2" Cawatla s.vMO sarvit.,Inc 'Inuary 10, 1944 Don Monaghan City ..,f Renton Municioal Building ?UO Mil? Avenue South Renton, WA 96055 RE: UP 314 Deai Don: Enclosed you will find a letter from MLW Concrete regarding the throa ,,3 Al iveways on 27th. Please review and contact me. "ours truly, RR R. PEARY 'dice PlF-sr3ent. MRF:kd Enclosure 4 ffi BAN 1 3 .lanuary 7, 19s4 HLn Concrete Construction, Inc. 75141 169th Ave. S.E . Kent, Ma. 9sn4? Nark Perry Cascade Septic Service, in,. P.O. Doc 44010 Tacoma, 4j.94444 Jeer Hark. Per inur request. Please note the followinq list e,t,lalnlnI wh1 we re ptlr- an additional pnimr-it of $409.64 for the Inst nil it lun of drlaewa,s on tin 114. Hit hi lllat lun of men and equi pme at to be hrooght hnrl. 1,, th,- joh site. Item 11 ? laborers 04 hours rash $190.4h Item r? 1 finisher -11 hours 109.04 Item P1 1 one ton ds hours 110.01 Total S409.n4 Please cuntact mr If ♦ou h.nr an, further tpwntlons. Slncrrrll (��1 c�lc -J,� Q sliliam A. Licksell President. HL91 Concrete COnstauctlon. Inc, OF Rp t"t x PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT g a DESGN '1;`L'iv ENINEERry • 235 263, '^ MUMCiPAL RV!LOING E00 WLL AVE SO RENroN,WASH."Oaa 4 P ,fro SE.'L��eS SARSARA Y. S.%40Cm MAYOR MEMORANDUhl retrue,ry 29, 1984 ^C Vorra 44rr4Ck, nurChaS}nq r.0., :On Mpnagnan. Enq�nrertm Ref Retainaga - Cascade Seotic Service Inc, contract CAG :36.82 'r Or to re'easire the retairage for the referenced Contract, tar contractor nett !o cost a nand 1n the ampunt Of 'Or acr, 'a^coos work he n,. $56.623.43 e not, as vet, comrleted. At '��" �'ne t�`e rv'ta trage 's ready to be released, would you ,,�•'".r servru ra �..rt� `or '" amodrt -ertloned above or q- a" a"-c'ear «Oet - �r Y•u rpw ve •hn Ca"CL, would you tend it up to me for pro. ceSs'^g, �!Iankti: ca.cAa. 6IE4Vi fF1 4�liafr��GhQ (1�tu�Q. s.PNc s.rv,t.,Inc, MR CS F*tru.ry 27, xJ44 1105 - LID 314 _ ._y.Chen,L_Order�_�_V^_� Don Monaghan City of Renton - -- - ---—----- MunicippP! Building, 200 Mtll Avenue Sogth Renton, WA 16055 -- O/NTIFYAN.' WE ARE SFNOINO IOU Xx knecnaa WM.r>"Wo lAY.r Y1. IM Yoll.wpp stain.. Pr(pp.A,tlW CMIWt COPY nl Left., rnm. PI.n1 SP Vtm.Uone S.bc.lwl CII.np.O,o.. S.w.lp D,.pos.l SYSIsm'A.UuPt C.rllllcato OI In.Ogn<. CllaOa Qa.laE WYc b W.cN.TgR i._ fit_ 4� _�. .&lwp¢e4rslex..B4 -OikaMdl _ THESE AAF r AANSMITTFO as ctl. k"bP .,,w SX Fo,.pptorM Fm R.n.w.nn Pomm.nl For S'e"tur. X RD,Y.,u.. APWOY.Yt..note R.lu.n Orpm.l 4 raCuaal.d A.IumaO lm cm,.cbm+ Raiurn C"Y(N.) FOR.108 out _.. ..,_... IA PRINTS AVURNEDAVItIt LOANTOUS AFMARA8 Cl JIRt OF R,c, I J �R-17 � PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT U DF.S1GN,UT11)Tr ENGINEFRiNG 9 235 2631 a� NIUNICI►AL BUILDING ZOO MILL AVE SO BENTOK WASH.Mean e P reD gE►T L`� BARBARA T. SHINPOCH February 22, 1984 MAYOR Mr. Mark Perry CASCADE SEPTIC SERVICE, INC. P.O. Box 44010 Tacoma WA 98444 Subject: Revised Punch List For L.I.O. 4314 Dear Mark: As you have completed many of the items on the punch list submitted with my letter of January 19, 1984. I have up-dated the list deleting those items. Please find the n•-. list attached. Very truly yours, Donald G. Monaghan, P.E. Design Engineer :ckd Attachment .a IFor Use tv City Clerk's Office Only AGENDA ITEM RENTON CITY COUNCIL 14111111114 i SUBMITTING Oopt./Div,Ad./Coats. Public workslEeeinearing For Agenda Of March IZ 198r, _ Meet nq n Steff Cattactz rd Houghton/Pon MonagMn �� Agenda Status: SUBJECT: Final Assessment Roil Consent D. No. 311 and Pub llt Hear inn Public Maaring� Corresponds, Old l nantu.'M Old Ousiness Eahiblts: (legal Doscr., Maps, Etc.)Attoch Now business - Study Session A. Engineer's Certificate _ Other B. Final Assessment Roll C. List of LID Milestones Approval: Legal Dept. yes_ No_ N/A_ COUNCIL ACTION AECOMMENOED: [..,aril QU rinance Dept. Yns— NO. N/A_ Other Clearance Fi t A m.nr e.J l .,d u• pAl i� H...1,... A.. 1 e I961._ FISCAL IMPACT• tapandlture Required $ Amount $ Appropriation- S Budgeted Transfer Required SUMMARY (Background information, prior action and effect of impl ementotion) (Attach additional pages if necessary.) See Attached List of Milestones PARTIES OF RECORD/INTERESTED CITIZENS TO BE CONTACTEO: SIISM IT TNI COPY TO CITr,CLEAK Rr MOON ON iNURSOAY wITN DOCIBIENS'ATIDM. ENGINEER'S CERTIFICATE Honorable City Council Renton, Washington Complying with Resolution No. 2283 being a Resolution creatinn Local improvement District No. 314 and Ordinance No. 3356 orderino the con- struction thereof, I have prepared the following Assessment Roll in accordance with Ordinance No. 274 and the laws of the State of Washington, I find that ttwl actue cost Of sail lean ovevent was and is the sum Of Si. Million. Nine Hundred ana Sl.•v-Nine ,houmnd,One Hundred and Thirteen t 60/100 Dollars, (S 6.969 113 60 _), and that said amount is equitably apportioned in the within roll to the property therein described m _ording to the benefits resultinn from said improvements to each ,,,t, tract, piece or parcel thereof, as set opposite each of said tracts respcci.ively in the column marked "Amount of Assessment", and l certify that this Assessment Roll, consisting of 11 _ panes, with parcels numbered L_ through _ 2 is a true and correct d>sessment roll for the aforesaid improvement. I herewith transmit this roll for equali2ati_an and confirmation. Respectfully, 111rector nTFub5iE Morki Bated CERTIFICATE OF CITY COUNCIL This is t0 certify th5t the Final Assessment Roll of Local Improvement District No, was duly confirmed by Ordinance No. of the City of Renton Washington, the day of icy !rk WARRANT FOR COLLECTION To the City Treasure, : 1 herewith hand you Assessment Roll of Local Improvement District No, for collection by you In accordance with City Ordinance No. and the laws of the State of Washington. ty _.._Renton _�, Washington, w 19_,,,,_ L.I.D. NO. 314 MILESTONES Initial Resolution No. 2283 7/2/79 Second Resolution 2299 9124/79 First Public Nearing 10/15/79 Second Public Nearing 11/5/79 Ordinance No, 3396 1121/80 Amount of ►ref binary Assessment Roll $6,236,538.56 Start of Construction 7/6/82 Completion of Construction 2/7/84 Acceptance of Project 2/27/84 Final Public Hearing 4/9/84 Amount of Final Assessment $6.969.113.60 FINAL COSTS Engineering and Administration $1.066,482.07 Finance Costs $ 16,510.00 interim Financing $ 793,524,57 6nnd Discount and Registration S 290.889,40 City Clerk $ 1,391.20 utility Division $ 2,916.32 Right-of-May S 506,734.66 Attorney's Fees 5 F.495,3o Subtotal Administration Cost $2.646.963.52 Construction Cost $4,282,150.08 TOTAL COST TO L.I.D. $6,969,113.60 EXNIBI? "A" Tce project shall consist of the widening and improvement of East Valley Rood from S.M. O st Street to S.M. 16th Street to 36 feet curb to curb; the widening and improvements of S.N. 16th Street from East Valley Road to Lind Avenue to 16 feet curb to curb; the construction of S.W. "th from East Valley Road to the proposed Valley parkway 36- and AA-feet curb to curb; and the construction of S.N. 19th from East Valley Road to Lind Ave. S.M. A feet curb to curb. Improvements shall consist of surcharging, grading, paving, illu;J nation, curb, gutter, sidewalk, storm drainr?e piping, installation of water and sewer piping, construction of a sanitary sewer lift station at Lind Ave. and S.W. 19th, and construction of a traffic signal at Lind Ave. and S.W. 16th. CAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT YORKSMEET Lle NAME Awe NLurRR, CREATED BY CITY COUNCIL ON January 21. 1980 LDATEL BY ORDINANCE 3396 PY8Pn5F, SEE Attached "Exhibit A" LDCATIDN, SEE attached "Exhibit A" TOTAL CDST, $6,969.113.60 CITY PARTICIPATION, -0- TDTAL ASSES_[NENT pOLL, 6,%9,113.60 AMOUNT Df PREPAYMENTS, AMQiJI1lT of BOND ISSUE, NUMBER Of ANNL L PAYMENTS DN SSESSMENTS, 15 INTEREST RATE ON ASSESSMENTS, RATE PER ASSESSARLF UNIT OF FRONTAGE ANQ/QR SQUARE FQOTA• , Varies ASSE SLED VALUE DF LID, LAND $20.866,200.00 IMPROVEMENTS 39,365,200.00 TOTAL $60,231 ,400.06 DATE 30 DAY PREPAYMENT PERIOD EXPIRED, NDMRER DF PROPERTY PARCELS 1N LID, 92 TYPE OF AREA AND ZONING IN LID, L-1, M P. G-1, R-1 PERCENTAGE DEVELOPED WITHIN LID, ASSESSMENTS allTSIW ING IN LID FDR DTHER LID S, AMOUNT OF DELINQUENT ASSESSMENTS IN LID FOR OTHER L10'S, SI2E OF LID IN ACRES, 307.87 Acres MAP OF LID IF AVAILABLE, MAP OF LIe IF AVAILARLE, GITY FINANCIAL IMF QRMATION, ASSFSSFD VALUATION OF CITY, OIITSTANOtNG BONGS, GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS, REVENUE BONDS, LID BONDS AND NOTES, BAL ANC Of IO • iAR1NTY F � e, of ►?E, t� } ° PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT OfSOGN, ,.nv LNt;INf F RINU • :35 2631 i J► MUNICIPAL BUILDING 100 Mill AVE SO. REN10N,WASH.NOW 9 p P irEO SE P1f� BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAVOR February 22, 1984 Mr. Michael Mastro G & M Investments SIG Rainier Ave. S. Seattle, MA 98144 Re: Easement and Statutory Warranty Deed in Connection with L.I.C. No. 314 Dear Mr. Mastro: Enclosed are the referenced documents for your records. Very truly yours, Donald G. Monaghan, P.E. Design Engineer :,lft Enclosures "C"D 5' a OF Rey FUBUC pW�ORK$DEpr. TO OFFIC8 OF THR CITY ATTORNEY a RENTTON.�MWOTON U 'L rosy os.a so.sw ,00 s e.,May • x+.w w.anpron ssur ..'an g LAWREPWCE i WARREN. cr.•r•wn.a. DANIEL KELLOGG, vvs,. , cn. p� DAVID M.DEAN, .unan.ne..repay. qo SEvsE MARK E DARKER. Hart•«• cr.••row. :ANETTA L FONTES. •asaw. co..npny February 15, 1984 MARTHA A FRENCH nart.nr¢,.....ow. TO. Richard Houghton, Public Works Director FROM: Lawrence J. Warren. City Attorney RE Mastro LID Dear Dick: Please find enclosed a bill for Mike Rodgers for his assistance on the Mastro condemnation in which his assistance was necessary because of my involvement in Playtime and because of several tricky legal issues involving this parcel of property. If you have any questions, please let a know. r ,,y ewren e U.- amen LJW:nd Encl. cc: Mayor MORRIS a RODG ERS,,nroRNEYS AT LAW I II II NE THIRD STREET YaIGWiMWRM•i BELLEVUE,WkSWA OTeN EEBW . ' ■iL"14011YIi Px 00 4*11 io Wn Y nvNfw S7A7�ff CITY OF RENTON January 31, 1984 c/o Larry Warren 100 South Second Re: LID Renton, WA 98057 SMR:mar For professional services rendered, including the following: 1963 11/22 Telephone conference with city attorney Larry Warren; telephone conference with Ralph Gilbo 12/2 Conference with city attorney and appraiser Gilbo in Renton 12/23 Research city condemnation and LID statute; opinion letter to city attorney 19ni 1/12 "Telephone conterence with attorney Jack Borland 1/13 Review letter to clients telephone conference wth attorneys Bob Tjossem and Dick Houghton 1123 Review letter from Tjossem; telephone conference: with T3ossem FEE 15.0 hrs x S95/hrl $475.00 FL 325 Rev. 10/I4/70 Contract No. C.A.G. NOTICE OF COMPLETION OF PUBLIC WORKS CONTRACT To. State of Washington Date Excise Tax Division Audit Section lax Commission Olympia, WA 98504 00 Not Use From: City of Renton Assigned to: Finance Department 200 Mill Avenue South Date Assigned: Renton, WA 96055 P.W.G. Number: Date: Gentlemen: Notice is hereby given relative to the completion of contract or project described below: Drscription of Contract Contractor's Name Contractor's Address - Date Work Commen,ed .. Date Work Completed + Date Work Accepted: Surety o. Bonding Company Agent's Address Contract Arount Amo,nt Disbursed Additl ons Amount Retained Sales Tax Total Total By D s1 D�rslce b�fTcer-�Tnance DlncNr THREE COPIES OF THIS NOTICE MUST BE COMPLETED BY THE DISBURSING CFFICLR AND MAILED TO THE DEPARTMEPT OF REVENUE AT OLYMPIA. WASHINGTON IMhEOIATELv AFTER ACCEPTANCE OF THE WORK DONE UNDER THIS CONTRACT. NO PAYMENTS SMALL BE MADE FROM RETAINED FUND UNTIL RECEIPT Of DEPARTMENT'S CER 1 ICA [-AMB THEN ONLY IN ACCORDANCE WITH SAID CERTIFICATE. cc. Department of Labor and Industries FL 325 W Rev. 10/14/70 Contract No. C.A.G. NOTICE OF COMPLETION OF PUBLIC WORKS CONTRACT To. State of Washington Date: '- Excise Tax Division Audit Section Tax Commission Olvapia, WA 98504 Do Not Use AS,ignrc to From: City of Renton Finance Department Data a„igned: 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 P.W.L. Number: Datr Gentlemen: Notice is hereby given relative to the completion of contract or project described below: I Description of Contract Contractor's Name Contractor's Address Date Work Commenced Data Work Completed Date vork Accepted: Surety or Bonding Companv Agent's Address Contract Amount - Amount Disbursed Additions Amount Retained Sales Tan Total Total By Disbursing 0 car - Inance D rector THREE COPIES OF THIS NOTICE MUST BE CDMPLETED BY THE DISBURSING OFFICER AND MAILED TO THE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE AT OLYMPIA, WASHIN,TON IMMEDIATELY AFTER ACCEPTANCE OF THE WORK DONE UNDER THIS CONTRACT. NO PAYMENTS SMALL BE MADE FROM RETAINED FUND UNTIL RECEIPT OF DEPARTMENT'S CERTIFICATE, AND THEN ONLY IN ACCORDANCE WITH SAID CERTIFICATE. tc: Department of Labor anJ Industries PUBLIC. WORKS 'ON7RA,.TS - LIEN FOR EXCISE TAXES -- FINAL PAYMEK RCW 60-28-CLO (sec, 6 chap. 2)6, Law; of :c5 : The amount of all taxes, in- creases and penalties due or to become due under Title 82, RCN free a contractor or his Successors or assicnees with respect to a publw tnprovement contract where- on the contract price is five thousand dollars or more shall be a lien prior to all otner liens upon the amount of the retained percmt&Fe withheld by the dis- bursing officer under such contract, and the amount of all other taxes, increases end penalties due and owint, from the contractor shall be a lien upon the balance of such retaine4 percentage remaining in the possession of the disbursing office- after all other statutory lien cl?!nr have �,tm, F.aid. ri w 00.2d. C50 (sec, 5 chap. 236, laws of 1955) Upon final acceptance of a contract, the state, county or other municipal officer charged with the duty of disbursing or authnriting disbursement or payment of such contracts shall forth- with notify the Tax -- mmiselon of the completion of said contract. Such officer shall not make airy payment from t;ie retained percentage fund to my person, until he has received from the Tax Co.aniasion eertificate that ell taxes, .ncroases, and penalties due from the contractor, and all taxes due and to become due with respect to such contract have been paid in full or that they are, in the cosuaissients opinion, readily collectible without recourse to the state's lien on the retained. percentage. HN 60.28.060 (sec. 6 chap. 236, laws of 1955) If within thirty days after receipt of notice by the Tax Commission of the completion of the contract, the amount of all taxes, increases and penalties due from the contractor or any of his succcssors or assignees or to become due with reelect to such contract have not been paid, the Tax Commission may certify to the disbursing officer the amount of all taxes, increases and penalties due from the contractor, together with the amount of all taxes due and to become due with respect to the contract and may request Payson' thereof to the Tex Comaission in accordance with the priority provided by Uxis chapter. The disbursine officer shall within ten days after receipt of such cartif'.c, 1, on.l request pay to the Tax Commission the amount of all taxes, increases and penalties certified to be due or to become due with respect to the particular contract, and, ifter px�� Pnt of all claims which by statute are a lien upon the retained percentase withheld by the disbursing officer, shall pa} to the Tax Comaiiaeion the balance, if any, or so much thereof as shall be necessary to satis^y the claim of the Tax Commission for the balance of all taxes, increases or penalties shown to be due by the certificate of the Tax Comedesion. If the contractor owes no taxes imposed pursuant to Title 82, .�Nj the Tax Comission ehall so certify to the disbursing officer. For Use IV City Clerk's Office Only Ip l AGENDA ITEM RENTON CITY COUNCIL ISFFTING ..«....«.«..................................... .w.............w««............r.... SUBMITTING Dept./Div./Bd./Comm. - For agenda Of - - _-- '- - Meting Date Staff Contact —ZNime� Agenda Status: SUBJECT: Consent Public Clearing_,_ Correa;,cadence �. .c. - OrdinaecedMfolution Old Business Exhibits: (Legal Descr., Maps, Ete.)Attoch New Business_ Study Session__ A. Other B. C. Approval : Legal Dept. Yes— No_ N/A_ COUNCIL ACTION RECOMMENDED, . Finance Dept. Yes_ NO_ N/A_ x Other Clearance FISCAL imPACT: - ture Required S mo Expenditure Aunt S Appropriation- Budgeted Budgeted Transfer Required S SUMMARY (Background information, prior action and effect of Implementation) (Attach additional pages if necessary.) PARTIES OF RECORD/INTERESTED CITIZENS TO BE CONTACTED'. SUBMIT Ta15 COPY TO CITY CLEAR OY NOON ON TNURSDAY NITN OOCtMENTAT ION. Cascade Sepllc service Inc Don Monaghan City of Renton micipal Buildinq 240 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 9BOSS Rka LID Sli Arbitration Items Dear Din: We ackhawled9t receipt of your January i4, 1984 letter where the City proposes to pay for Puoet Powers relocation of the power line and markup on our nuhcontractors. We also believe that out ^dsitimn was the fair and equitahlP position. We will accept your offer as a aetllemant to the niapute without acknow:edainq that those were our total costs for the relocation of the power. If l can he or any furth.vr Servic e, please contact me. MARK R. P&RRV vice President UP:kd cct John Harrtler, Attorney at. haw 1^ �.� PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT pFSIGIN V•iI TV FNG IN' £F'N" 0 235 2631 y t2 MUNICIPAL BUILDING 700 WILL AVE SO. At N TON,WASH $110" gAAB ANA v i�NPOC„ February 14, 1984 MAYOR Mr. Mark Perry Cascade Septic Service, lilt. P.O. Box 44009 Tacoom MA 98444 Subject: CAG 034-82 L.I.D. 0314 Change Order 06 Dear Mark: Enclosed please find Change Order 06 of the above-mentioned project. Please execute and return as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact me at 735-2631. Very truly yours, Donald G. MDnaahan, P.F, Design Engineer :ckd Enclosures CITY Of RENTON PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT page Ywt I�. v1 Z.._ Order CHANGE ORDER woman, 6 rl Jra.,.J er 'W°r Lm at SKt'on 4-1 at the CMtte t 14. LAG 034-82 U St anJW Spas,f,.Nlw it�f�al — _ Tr. Cascade Septic Service Inc. CTm{. IrarymJ of tilt r.<lar P.O. ROx 44010 Tacoma WA 98444 �. w4met J of Cascade Se 0 0o w Sir Mato hernl Aid ft. Title _,_ ►meat Vitt* -- Corexf Stvu by, s,atelp' led" utu+.Ata1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . h4scalrTloN Of Was ' • • • • • , ' ' . ' ' ' ' ' ' ' • ' Tao an aniseed to Mrhf• tao hllwln{aoterlhoa .aft olot roc.tin .t w approve,, up of exit count. order. B-4 033 Relocate Junction Box S 438.01 034 Additional Markup 204.45 B-2 024 Replace Hydrant Valve 72+72 I', 1,704.09 6-3 f194 Repair to S.W. 16th St. West of Lind t¢ 1,495.32 $20 Reconstruction of Old Wet Well t5 972.15 021 Relocate Potvrr at Pump Station LS 3.042.90 t11 A. wren ult on, aa.suroa.nt eo ho m etc Hance etch the ptov,ewns of the Stanaer4 hp.cefiuuaat aM Spat Ul hest tone for the no of cwtro,ttun tnvolvoa ORIGINAL CONTMR CURRIENT CONTRACT 191It1ATSD Nn CHANG[ [STIMAT[D CONTaAC•T AMOUNT AMUNT THIS ONDaa TOTAL AR[a CHANGE s 4,026,581.39 t 4,087,628.46 t 14,837,90 t 4,1!I.',16h.36 _ AceAcr use t.twv use &"rMAL umtetvnO &"arid afeaT At mc,"alOa Apow"D DISTRICT STATI-AID t■:Iwu __ ._ Due ORIGINAL —T-- -- CITY OF RENTON PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT .AO 034-82 CHANGE ORDER ESTIMATE tr. wnc Ialwlm IRa atallr CttpullM MII WI Wwnn ylplwt M. M glummlCl C.MOC C%" E-' K77A Sidewalk Removal LS $ 1,500.00 t78 Sawcuttinq Sidewalk LS i 172.50 979 Additional Markup LS 1.216.83 A-1 #64 Crack Sealing LS 3,557.96 I a65 Additional markup LS I 533.69 I i I 1 I I � i I M.A. SEGALE,INC. �• ASPHALI DIVISION January 31 , 1984 Catekde Septic Service PO Box 44009 Tacoma, VA 98444 BE: Beating, Sealing and Sanding of existing cold joints, per punchlint This work to be completed the weak of January 30, 1984, por conversation between John Vukonich and Don Monaghan. IMM KlIT"NTIR PARKWAY . PO OOx SM . TUKWIt A,W"H,NQWN Mme O4l1 lr!-Oia, AA O!W nlPU'WMtY lTpOrv1, denise bieker graphic design 'a)' 114M AV S E karts+ M 9&)56 R(k) '2O 12N f DaLeE 1�3�?;Qc Invoice Numbert t'0844 Net Collectable (tlavtt)t '�• .Ltv of Renton 200 Mill Avomte Sc,. centon. Washington 080E•5 MOttrt. Doscript I on Unit Price Prlcv _____ ____________________________ __________ ----- ZO.00 AS DUiLTS FOR LAD 314 25.00 750.0c. I OTAL t 9o/�T��is . sy/. ,o . outs=�9so ou - aswy ,' s CMARTEn 116. LAWS OF 190 CITY OF RENTON C71.RTMCATION �tM U.W..+Mn[n... sr r1.••:�raa ryyF M 17M}•v ,MR AA 4'.��' ...� ��, w .!° Sn]l PN YIM01 N' 101 i.L�. t.0 i4'R JA ltTYWW� 04, om"ale tirl .a l a .. A . oI Met " Amsem 11 NWI IXI OR�t .aw me a 111 t M/ Wtll�►l,,t 1{IW OIIMt l0 Me eW ma � VA.0 � A VVomen's Business EnWPM * 4u Cascade ,r. Septic Service,Inc. n 4"Arz w January 19, 1984 Don Monaghan City of Renton Municipal Building 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA r8055 R9t LID lid Dear Don; Enclosed you will find a letter from Frank Coluccio Construction Company requesting a pion showing tnc stations Of the bo. that is approved by you. Will you please assemble thia and forward it to us as quickly as passible. Yau tiny4Q,,//JJ .P/�RK R. PER4Y Vice "resident MRPrkd U Enclosure .. tt Fronk Coluccio Construction Company 91M141 WATIRMAINI - UTILIT111 "M IMPIII WAY SOUTH SIATTtl WASNRVOTON "116 �2"1 ► 4M January 10, 1984 Cascads Septic Service. Inc. Vo. So• 4.010 Tacoma. .?A 18444 Subject: city of Renton L.L.D. M4 Gent lawn: Reference is made to the final ju4nt it its and figures as •u suiomltfed to us with your let.er of Jaauary 1. 1984. We do not agree with some o' these figures and ask that am final settlement be delayed until we hive m apportunity to so aver them with +ou. In the meantime. we would .tppreciate your sending a plan Sheet eM+wino the footage k+f 0" pipe AS 1pprwed by the City of Ranto". Very truly vours. FRANK COLUCCIO CONSTRUCTION COMPANY Office Manager AVRtbb C r ' "620 • GOMM W. ' r • e�: :13t"l2� r1 ay`rtl'\1S Ij'1" >*�r 'CA:. 'i1r� t•. }r ci�T'rt.�r t a Cascade Septic Service,Inc. December 21, 1983 Don Monaghan City of Renton Municipal Building 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, NA 96055 RE: LID 314 Dear Door Enclosed you will find the final punch lists. 1 believe all the items have been completed. I do not understand the portion of your December 15. 1983 letter r,lating to the storm sewer. The contract calls for the marnules to be water tight, we have gone to a great deal of time and effort to demonstrate that these manholes are water tight. If at the end of one (l) year the manholes are found to be leaking, we will return to fix any leaks. I do not believe that the problems were severe enough to require additional guaranties. If I can be of any further service, please contact me. Yours7A D" MARK R, PERRY Vic. President MRP=kd Enclosure OF k�n'4 i RaPUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT DESIGN/UTILITI ENCINEFRING 0 F MUNICIPAL SUILDIND 200 MILL AW SO. RENION.WASH.MIM e rEO SLP16 p BARBARA v SNINPOCN MAYOR Januare 16, 1984 Cascade Septi Oi Le Inc. P.O. Box 440� Tacoma, WA 98444 Re: L.I.D. 314 - Arbitration Item Dear Mark: Regarding the above referenced item, the City proposes to pay $3.042.90 for the powerline relocation and $1.652.80 for prime contractor markup on subcontractors' change order work. He still believe that our pos'tion is correct ind that we would prvail if arbitration were pursued. Our decision to pay these items at this time is strictly one of economics. If you concur in this proposal, please advise. Very truly yours, DonalJ G. Monaghan, P.E. Design Engineer DGM:!rt IXAACE. RANALRR, RULRUNER.RDRROW N +ItN4.o, W"C. DAYNOTP Y MNLINR .4 .6ftal.tu too. +4N11t. 0.01161-0.41 co+004.1.0N .lb\p\..'at-so ATTORNiYi AT lMY l<Mh{IIQt)R.•bH N tx NtiN p +11440.1 �QNN M VV xOY, h11 tT iN4.P 4a •Uia ,x)Nx V +40lxt ❑O •.G I: Vt NVa,61.15 MO.) YNON [ + w[l. T&COMA.MAe M,MOTOM "*OR 41 1pN M lSxl f IM.tAY.tt[N 10 ,QNx..•.Wt July 22. 1903 9 fC Donald G. Monaghan, P.E. �� S Design Engineer Public Works Department Municipal Building �e 200 Mill Avenue South Ronton, Washington 99055 Rot Cascade Septic Service, LID 314, Sanitary Sewer Lift Station Dear Sirt Cascade Septic Service, Inc., has referred to this office the followinq document concerning the above subject, LID 314, Sanitary Sewer Lift Stationt 1983.1. Your letter to Cascade Septic Service, Inc, of July 14, 2. Cascade Septic Service's letter of July 15, 1983, to you. 3. Your letter of July 15, 1%83, to Cascade Septic Service. By its communications, Cascade Septic Service has given you notice of the nature and amount of damages from your interpretation, Cascade Septic Service has stated it appeals the decision, in accordance with the contract, and th!s means arbi—ation. Speaking on behalf of Cascade Septic Service, Inc., this is to name Mark Perry as the choice of cascade Septic Service for an arbitrator. We trust that you will forthwith appoint in arbitrator to meet with Mr. Perry, the two of them will name a third, and the matter will proceed to arbitration in accordance with the general provisions of the contract. We would one last time urge reconsideration of your position. In this case the nbstructions of other utility lines, not shown in the plans, were extraordinary both in the hazards they posed, from attempting to make installations near theme and in the enormous costs of doing shoring other than standard shoring. Section 5-1.08 relates to matters of convenience, and not to problems of this magnitude. Donald G. Monaghan, p,E, July 22, 1981 page Two. We submit this for your consideration, but in the event it cannot be resolved by agreement, request that arbitration proceed as set forth above, YSUrs very truly, � HAN Si.P,fi JFH tah act Mark Perry WLAUK. UA.NRLRR. KiTIeSU NRR. dURROM& •.C«•4a " f• AAY ROlf • 6ARLIRL .+ca«•iawi a•a wa ,a;w r MaN1191,f• IgQI(••iQMa, a[IaNCII :O.101•I.ON •lM\+ . 4TTeaNave AT LAWYa•p4.04 •[«Nt•«• •w•axs �On4 a W.wp.. ,iNN •4.[Nf qr{ IJS• q,.w a M•44t iC MC [.0 •vt 4u[ •u.f SRC ..a+••a Nct• N[O Ma.Wg N,NOTON aa401 uN f ro•+f• C 1ua n.a 4e July 22, 1993 JUL 25 %3 Mr, Donald Monaghan •"' City of Renton Municipal Building 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washinqton 98055 Re, Cascade Septic Service Inc LID 3144 Change Order No 4 Dear Sirs Cascade Septic Service, Inc. has referred to this office the following, in connection with the above subject, 1. Change Order No. 4. dated May 12, 1993. 2. Letter of Cascade Septic Service, Inc, to yourself, dated June 11, 1903. 3. Your letter of July 12, 19S3, to Cascade Septic Service, Inc. 1983.4. Cascade Septic Service, Inc. letter to you dated July 14. As indicated in Mark Perry's letter to you of July 14, Cascade. Septic Service, Inc. UOtilivd you that it Appealed your decision Of July 12, in acoordance with the contract provisions relatinq to disputes and litigation, and you were put on notice that Cascade Septic Service, Inc. claim&d I%% profit and overhead on Chanqe Order No. 4, Items No. 64, 29, and 27. Speakinq for Cascade Septic Service, Inc. , that. Company hereby appoints Mark Perry as its arbitrator. We trust that you will select an arbitrator, with whom Mark Perry will twat, and the two &Kali select a third arbitrator. The dispute will then be resolved by arbitration in accordance with the 4eneral provisions of the contract relatinq to disputes and litigation. I would, in addition, submit the followin, for final consideration of yourself and your counsel. It is undisputed that the items Mr. Donald Monaghan July 22, 1983 Page Two. in question are extras. we understand paragraph 9-1.03, "Payments for Extra Mork," to provide that extras are to be paid for either by an acceptable lump-sum proposal, unit contract prices contained in the contract or mutually agreed, or force account. If thc • is a lump-sum proposal, it will obviously include uverheaa profit, because this is the only way a contractor can survive. If it is unit prices, these obviously include overhead and profit, because as a matter of economics a contractor could nct survive on unit prices that did not include these. We come now to force account. In 9-1.04 it is expressly Irovided that for labor the contractor will be entitled to labor costs, and overhead and profit of 20%. On force account, for materials, and equipment, the contractor gets costs plus 15% for overhead and profit. We cannot, then, see any plausible basis for denying the contractor overhead and profit in this case. We see no basis in the contract for drawing a distinction whether the contractor does this, by his own labor and materials, or subcontracts it to others. In either event, he is responsible for it. When the contractor subcontracts some of the work, he obviously adds overhead and profit. We would add that we believe custom and usage support this. We do submit this for your consideration, but trust that an arbitrator will be named, and arbitration proceed, if agreement cannot be reached. Yours very truly, f S R JFH:ah Cc: Mark Perry JOB ORDER COST ESTIMATE 'AV NUM9E4 -- -�'NOC SRErVIN0l --1 G CONTRACT O COST PLUS tEStiMRRD REMOVAL [ COST 6 APPLICABLE _ o(Wv I Ail MI 'ER,l .ASSJIf AfIOh i9At[R�ywa' As AMOUN' +JU t•9A'l •.0.a, 1M.` N' ENGINEERING _- .lNE POAEMAN .INEMAN . MA DES++Y., ta♦ aVC_N1 .E51 du.� ur: W,•.N- - --+.� �..Gt3K "se 9c .,I o -- TRARSI.ORTATIOEE AM!_QUtPl .,aUua PATE -4. w I11 S nAnNo9rAnon R ETC ! N AM,','NT •A: � y 'A NERAL OVERMEAO suS IWAL � H18R(R ftl KuNa.mn RNIRRRV i 7p�pwAry AaR p,b.v .'...._. a y SUB TOTAL • SALES TAX(Ir AppliL~ TOTAL)09 r , ORIGIN" pYISION MARRETREG DUPLICATE LINE tNAOQUARTERS CORN t Cascade Septic Service,Inc. l In.tar% Don Monaghan City of. Renton Municipal Building 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Wa 9dOSS RE! LID 314 Dear Don: The purpose of this letter is to summarize our telephone conversation of January 4, 1984. There are some differences in the quantities and the arbitration items that need to he resolved before final payment. Our last draw request was September 1483 and we are working diligently to have these differences resolved by January 12, 1984. If it is not resolved by then, you will process a check for the amount admittedly owsd. If I can be of any further service, plo,-,o contact me. Yours //r u MM/S- lv 2'�(/,��'"�_�'�� & MARK R. PERRY / �I ViCe President MRP ekd JAN 1 1884 cc: John Hensler - Attornev RECEIVED MALIC WORKS DFAr, uF RE'.i. CITY OF RENTON OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY HENTON,WASHINGTON 0 r roil M.."W,fM ,0'. f t.r VM\, • rinrOn.w3wnwrM MON iff MA AWHENCE i WARREN. c...n DANIEL KELLOGG. sswstwt at.atrpna• Pb DAVID M DEAN sswfrM\r c,*.tnpwr f MARK E.BARRIER, •anunr cr•.ac•M• reo SEPIV ZANETTA 1. FONTEa, +swft.n+ c,rr.rrw.,.t. January 9, '984 MARTHA A FRENCH.•swsr.al c,l.111 n ' TO: Richard Houghton, Public Works Director FROM: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney RE: LID #314 Ar, ation Dear Dick: On the small :\rbitration with the contractor on LID 4314, it may be that the best financial interest of the property owners would be to pay the claim. As I understand it, the interest is running $1,650.00 per day and any arbitration may extend the closing date on the LID. I also understand that of the $5,000.00 claimed by the Contractor, that the Citv is willing to concede a portion of it. Under this set of facts, it would appear prudent to negotiate a settlement of the claim to save the property owners money. Lawrence Itarren LJW:nd cc: Mayor r• 4 January 1984 Tot non Monighan Rea L.I.L. 314 (rater Meters Per your request , the attached items were used to r,aise subject, water rmters. In addition to the parts utilized, the W.O. 4132 was charged R hours labor, for two men, for two days plus 15 hours charged for C7-100 repair truck. A copy of the material issue slip, including price is attached. Paul Mi 1etich InvQntory rantrol Splst. CITY OF RENTON MA',ERIALS ISSUED l o w WATERWORKS UTILITY Wow - TO STO\Fxtipto NwTMs UNfI �<r MATF\IAl COST AMOUNT _ l•'�`�'it-:._�.- "--'i...;�r...�..r�,�--.— __ —._. _— is 1..� ♦ r �_� �� rsc.r:cs .; �Re. sopm Il pr D [;4 C G"3 (OW4�s4G1 1�D4�c�DP P vke.O ac. ♦0 Ro.u4„ MR Tacoma.waSMaa 19g „ csfamloWN" $Nme-nM:154 POP - llas to aratin� anu.l■ Don Monaghan Citv of Renton .. Municipal Building 100 ,mill Avenue South ---- Renton, WA 98055 GENTLEMEN WE ARE SENDING YM ixAIIaDKea P eMwl aM IOnUR1 CWD Df L.Ov Dnni. pum BDKllmalron. sueconue<r C"• Oran S..."M.""61% r "M bow. tafulcHe er lnaW.nc. Cfw. r;oPaR wtt Ip _ N�pK —._ .. Hand carried to Gary Morrisan_Dy. Ld ttudAle, EIIEa!AM ERMIYNTFEO M eRRaRN RMs W RM RRR.RrFN is M.4w w.a Cemmem Fer Sgnelun `WIN ERIR RN ADpreM Is nor" Rewm OrrElnar At rRMMRIN RRfurn"I.r eoreecbrm. Rtlmn copy I411 FOR BIDS WF _ N�_.._ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US REMARKS cop. Mark Perry ��M e+tlDwrRa a'e nfH as ftaFe r rob'ror?.y11'a\� c.n Nn x '� J,,fr � J7 /„'ate. . .t ♦. � � ,.c i9 xti./ra. -'r fY er`t L4'� ..a dl r ant , . . e'r• u.'J'A „• '� A.. � ,w...r v!' �r:a. J .� F'/yf)M s,). 'x.r.; �i"'�i Jt{,. 1•'i�e. � ✓fie... YM•;�4. x =. n • OF Re'," �yrti PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT TRAFFIC ENGINEERING DwiSiON • 235 2620 MUNICIPAL BUILDING NO WILL AVE SO. RENTON.WASH OWU b rE0 SE PiE BARBARA y. SHINPOCM MAYOR October 24, 1983 Mr. Mark Perry Cascade Septic Service, Inc. P.O. Box 44009 Tacoma, MA 98444 Subject: L.I.D. ft. 314 Inspection Items Street Lighting s Traffic Signals Dear Mr. Perry: After review of our inspection list dated September 12, 1983. and October 5, 1983, the fnllwing are the only discrepancies remaining. I. Service cabinet at Sal 34th Struat k East VaiieV Road - Contactor relay wakes A vary loud buaa indicating the contactor relay Points need cleaning. t. Pole e7 has a broken corner on the concrete pad. 3. Intersection of SW Ibth a Lind Ave. Su - luwioairea on the traffic signal poles do not appear to have been leveled. 4. Intersection of W I6th St, L Lind Ave W - Paint scratched can lighting service cabinet. S. Sid 27th St, between East Valley Road 6 Lind Ave. Sid - Pole Mo. 15 needs the shaft cleaned of concrete. 6. Su 27th St. between last Valley Road and Lind Ave. SW - Pole No. IJ needs the shaft cleaned of concrete. J. SW 27th St, between East Valley Road and Lind Ave. W - Pole No. 19 needs concrete cleaned from the shaft. 8. SW 27th St. between East Valley and Lind Ave. SW - Junction boxes for lighting conduit street crossings do not have I-foot perimeter concrete pad 4 inches thick. 9. SW 19th St, from Lind A". $IV to East Valley Aead - Tpwh-vp paiet needed for system service cabinet. Mark Perry ga 2 ctober 24, 1983 10. SW 19th St. from Lind Ave. SW to East Valley Road - Pole 18 concrete pad for pole and junctlon box missing, 11 . SW 19th St, from Lind Ave, SW to East Valley Road - Pole 110 'De IC' P—d no concrete pad over foundation and around junction box, s� 12. SW 19th St, from Lind Ave. SW to East Valley Road - opposite r rra" side of road from pole 110 junction box does not have enough t!` fill dirt around box in back side. Mn�•9L^•♦n Ij, SW 19th St. from Lind Ave, SW to East Valley Road - Pole 113 17 /,//6 3 concrete pad incomplete - pole needs cleaning on the shaft. General Items/SW 19th St, from Lind to East Valley Road 14. Smooth out the dirt around the concrete pads and junction boxes. 15. Junction boxes for lighting conduit street crossings do not have i-foot perimeter concrete pad 4 inches thick. 16. SW 27th St. fMw Oakesdale Ave. SW to Lind Ave. SW - E-type junction box west of luminaire W. I at intersection with future Oakesdale Ave, needs fill dirt around box. 17, SW 27th St. from Oakesdale Ave. SW to Lind Ave. SW - Pole /6 junction box adjacent to nole has 3 conduits too high. 18, SW 27th St. from Oakesdale Ave. SW to Lind Ave. SW - Pole /9 needs cleaning. General Items/SW 27th St. from (lakesdale to Lind: ♦ +r 19. Iouch-up paint on the service cabinet Itcdled at Lied Ave,-4W, Circuit megger test is not acceptable (cabinet at SW 27th St, 6 Lind A". 5W). 21. Smooth dirt out around concrete pads. 22. Junction boxes for lighting conduit street crossings do not have 1-foot perimeter concrete pad 4 inches thick. 23. Paint striping and lane buttons end about Station 15 + 50. They Should us extended to Station 11 + 00. .lark Perry ,e 1 .tober 24, 1983 When these items have been addressed, please let us know. This will conclude the street lighting and traffic O gnal Inspection. Very truly yours, Gary A. Morris, P.E. Traffic Engineer CEM:ad cc: Don honaghan Ed TailleFer OF RFy a z PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT RiCHARD C HMHTON • DIRECTOR 1fi MUNICIPAL BUILDING 700 MILL AVE SD. RENTON,WASN.Egf6 \ ,Pe 206 235 2569 40 sip, BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR October 21. 1983 Mr. Mark Perry Cascade Septic Service, Inc. P.O. Box 44009 Tacoma, VA 98444 Subject: LID No. ,. Thermoplastic Traffic Arrows Dear Mr, Perry: On the south leg of the intersection of Lind Ave. SW 6 SW 16th Street the project drawings do not include the thermoplastic traffic arrows and the word 'Only" in the left turn pocket. 16"e ,P.e We wish to express our dtsire to have the arrows and word installed at this time as shown on the attached drawing marked in red. The item will be counted into the project at unit price bid. We noticed at the intersection of SW 27th Street and Lind Ave. SW on the westerly leg that the thermoplastic arrow at the bcginning of the left turn pocket was missing as of October 11. 1983. The 9-3/4 inch buttons fer the left turn pocket were also missing at that time. .. eI +- Please initiate completion of these items. Very truly yours, Donald`. Monaghan, P.E, Design ngineer CEM:ad Attachment cca G. Norris m 4M ! Y,tch Liao St*. 20+00 6*6 TMs 517 , - -, a I ' Lived Arr. S.W. . I= ry♦ blA.r'�� M ♦ I ♦ I2 - ( Ift'.Pw*mow 4 Its fit I „ v- I o a : �...r.• �j � �! i � 9� e� 112 0 00 00 0000 I d I +j ' 1 Mi 1 • I L L • � . . , ., � OHO M E M 0 R A N 0 U M DATE : Nov. 29. 1*83 TO: Don Monaghan FROM: Clint Morgan SUBJECT: L.I .D. No. 314 -- Bonding Amount for Street Lighting and Channelization 1 have estimated a bonding amount of S3,500.00 to complete the remaining item" left on the inspection for street Ilght1 nq and channel teat ion for the above-referenced protect. The traffic signal is considered complete. Attached letters to cascade Septic Service, Inc., dated October 21 and 24, 1983, are marked in red if completed. Also attached is a copy drawing of the intersection of SW 16th Street and Lind Ave. SW. A pot hole h .•: developed which should be corrected. Please notify Cascade of this pot hole. If you need more detailed ;nformation, let me know. CEM:ad Attachments cc: G, Norris Cascade Septic Service,inr. octoher 28, 1983 Don Monaghan City of Renton Municipal Building 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 9805S RE: LID 314 Letter dated October 24, 1983 Dee, Don: In response to your letter dated Octouer 24, 1083 there are some questions on the following items: 1. Item 18, 15, 22 - there are no bid items for .. Items 110, 11 and 12 - on 19th St. you and I walked the street and decided that those areas where there was not enough existing fill to pour the pads that there was no need for pads. So this has not been done. A. Item #16 - we need clarification on the location on Oaksdale Avenue, we are not familiar with this. Please supply us with further information. The rest of the items have been forwarded to the app,opriate subcontractors. You will be notified when they are complete. If I can be of any further service, please contact me. Yours truly, I � Do MARK PERRY Vice President MP=kd NOV 3 lqo OF RFti ,� i PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT qq RICHARD C HOUGHTON • DIRECTOR h d B MUNICIPAL BUILDING Zoo MILL AVE.SO. ROHTOH,WAOH.NON c 206 235-2569 rED 3[►I,Jd` BARBARA Y. SHINPDCH MAYOR MEMORANDUM Date: January 5. 1984 To: Larry Warren, City Attorney From: Richard Houghton, P/W Director Fe: L.I.D. No. 314 Arbitration Item As we discussed, the items which are in dispute with the Con- tractor for LID 314 only amount to about $5.000 totally. At this point in time, the interim financing is costing ahout 51,650/day. Although we are of the opinion that our position would be supported if the two matters were arbitrated, it appears that it would be in the hest financial interest of the property owners if we paid the claims. Your concurrence in this matter would be appreciated. DGM:Jft aoda. COMPANIES AFFORDING COYERAQU Qanfort b Fleming Insurance B")kers, Im' ----._. ....____._.___.___...____ _.-._.. .. P.O. Box 5387 :":' A OEited MstlGE{s�n'u . Tacoma, Washington 98405 Cascade Septic Service, Inc. P.O. Box 44010 Tacoma, Washington 98444 ryI1 This M to CM+kE that pollen of Inswilnce listed below have been issued to the insuNla named Abo"anO Are m le,te At this hn,a. Y ,'YRd en'.GVWAM I VTKrMryeFl 4"[f YY �- t (fR--.aslWn I1ii[ Ie t1R61'1 l'9,YNElIfMYI!feM11 I{6�T,JJI AIWSt`. 1}N1NSgM nx"nnv nsusy 1 i1 I1MgMpyW[w,�wWo�V"lf[PYu[bw I nu J4R nNWC. eWl,WI,M,,Y, Y'OMal4`•+W IMQYMN.f I M(NLMv[aWM I 1 } i�4MOlP 1piM W.MFeiY I :YeMMp � �f��,tL�TTC.JJyy��, wMMa MWMMeM"+k11MCYfM6 ��—� .._��.•.�_�._ IL,Wi{�N4 Yf.� I it#4..MM IM IIlpt- 1 —�' lu(OMORLLE AMMAM i tyyyyn000xkp `I J t . ..,t,CtNu I � tllKUv r��iPuE41+ i ' �P "NYFIil f e 1, doe+:- <aaN ero •xu _wORFMS COI1►ENSAOON ...,, '.,,. -"a e MPeeV ERS IIANEAs OTHER -A BROAD FORM c:A500-104 IU :-ea s2504250 PROPEWY DAMAGE V As respects: Lid~l14 - East Valley Road kiditicutal Insured E7darsenvent Attached -(Replaces Broad P4nm ProF>eity Iknlaen: port ion c,f ctrtif,oOtc1 previously ismInd. -., ,-. ;. Cit} of I+enton Public Forks Dept. 100 Mill Ave. S.Penton. Wa 98055 _ --•--....,,. V IV i + r a.T.eORM rose sw-ex ENDORSE PAENT 4.\\ r\q .\.M..1\. N.•r•N•YN\.M.•r .N N.w1M 12-13-83 =•*" PSR THE ATTACH_M :ERT_I_FiGTIL _.. Cascade Septic Sezvica, Inc. _ _ ...... � 4...Y ....,, ...qr ort i e n9 Tacoma, Washington __... ,Y.R__.. UM {�o,YtVN.4,Nb urn new o.rm N1 MY�N4�,M\u•aq l I-15-83. i 0.O1 B 0 ,. _ ZZ_i no w IT IS vERF.RY UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED THAT TRt df n• -� P jt, tf 8 40 R1f` d a .d` e c c'acs oaa oaa as 1_]__❑ 1-1 ❑ 11 f7 iJ I7 II 17 ! ] IS CORRECTED OR CHANGED TO READ AS FOLLOWS City of RentoN is added as additional insured but only as respects their interest ins LTD 314 Subject to the standard policy limitations, conditions and exclusions. i •Cameral M •GmwM h, Y r.n..,..e. .n.r •NM .rdanM untee.pn{rcY i.irAw ed o invwM b) ,his rndnrrnuM, OF RF PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT DESIGN/,;T'LiTv ENGINFERING 9 235 263 p MUNICIPAL BUILDING Ipa MILLAVE 50 RENTON WASN.9lU55 P to SEP,E BARBARA Y. SHINPOCM MAYOR December 15, 1983 Cascade Septic Service, Inc. P.O. Box 44010 Tacoma, WA 98444 Attent'on: Mr, Mark Perry, Vice-President Subject: L.I.D. No. 314, East Valley Highway Dear Mark: A final inspection of the subject project was helu and the work was found to be substantially completed. However, I am still in the process of assembling the punch list for those items we have discussed that will be completed next sprirg. Weather permitting, your creks have a few items yet to complete. Otherwise they will have to be added to the spring list. There are 61SO the items which are to be arbitrated and problems with the sanitary sewer lines on East Vdiley Road and on S.W. 27th St. which need to be resolved. Except for the unresolved items, the improvements were found to be in satisfactory condition for acceptance for continual mainte- nance by the City. As you recall, the sanitary sewer lines on S.W. 16th St. were to be guaranteed for two years and re-T.V.'d at the end of that time. Due to the problems you had with e storm sewer oI: East Valley Road, it will also need to be 9. in- teed for two years and inspected at the end of that time. N bond amount should be establ'.shed for this work. If you have ahy comments or questions, please advise, Very truly yours, Donald G. Monaghan, P.E. Design Engineer :jft OF RE, U z PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT DESIGN/UTILiTy ENGINEERING 235 611 MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE 5o. RENTON.WASH 9WSF e - e ��'E C', St ptE^'�L BARBARA Y SHINPOCH MAYOR December 7, 1987 Cascade Septic Service Inc. P.O. Box 44010 Tacoma, WA 98444 Attention: Mr. Mark Perry Subject: LID 314, East Valley Highway CAG 074�82 - Punch List for Street Lighting System Dear Mark: 1 have consolidated the items on the electrical punch list and believe the enclosed list represents the items remain- the that need to be completed on the street lightinq system. The numbers on the r;ght side of the Page relates to the Previous lists you have received. If you have any questions, please advise. Very truly Yours, Donald G. Monaghan, P.E. Design Engineer :jft Enclosures G /D 3 /) Xm.• t N«.k .«J,r f� L," s, aA Ay a/N/rs �I Pws«•.9' M..k� s •� L S. /z)� tJe�1� / 4s002 Y)! Pik 'is C/d. 4�,Cvwh f� Pdr '0 ,7 —4 ,e ♦{�F ?3 k I vim/ b) I Pu/e 'ri9 G/ C...tvs{ve •{� Pi/t i; PIAL ice) .iao+x oaf w(ir�avvw .` piles �/..cr .. s. J, _.( yr lriyr � i 4:) /:/e 9 c /e.� G. c.efc i-(-( ?.)a. b.a/..I Ave , $t Is-ira 0.C.1 /hv. _ . I � i I j a p/ Ss+1E r�.•eS .. r�tuS . w JS&4 o• '� O'4�c°!j �:.� �u .lsdr vt g rrwQsrrvN .� ; ;; ` � , O'el noot,,.s ew Q.�'vd N,. at WW Uu�er R r,� Sbb r ' , ,uwN 57neS' ¢E' 1,01 . . o F ,ur,�,r 9n,r b�' ra •w •. o,F, .uavC�' C+'sIS' SE' N'ry r .. 0.9 ruNoN sn�S d_P NW , . - �✓ (�V IL/diJCN S7llas' �� Nld /I , E' •r4 • No t v � .. ..r . .,.. . . ,. �' r� ;. i • low ✓ J.t./r`... y. . 142ys`,,•.:, Tm... f r.�v cr ,.x re gin, f It l:+r=+...�..... • 4 T PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT vP:mR DESIGN/UTILITY ENGINEERING 0 235 2631 Z g MUNICIPAL BUILDING M MILL AVE SO RENTON,WASH 98DS5 �9 C �P FO Sl IL BARBARA Y SHINPOCH MAYOR December 5, 1983 Cascade Septic Service, Inc. P.O. Box 44010 Taccrv, WA 58444 Attention: Mr. Mark Perry, Vice President Subject: CAG 034-82. East Valley Highway Dear Mark: Enclosed is the Weekly Statement of Working Days for the week ending December 2, 1983. Please note there are II working days remaining on the con- tract as Of OCCember 2nd, 1983, We are also enclosing copies of two letters for your records. Very truly yours, Donald G. Monaghan, P.E. Design Engineer :Jft Enclosures L of 1?4,41 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT DESIGN/UTILITY ENGINEERING 0 235 26.I'i c . MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE.SO. RENTON.WASH.98055 S. N f0 1 rE` SEPt E� BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR MEMORANDUM Date: Novembe.t 29, 1983 To: Latty Saviage Ftom: Don Monaghan Re: L.I.D. 314 Water Neteta P-!t oun ptevioua diacueaians, the meters at the toeationa .fisted betole need to be tailed one boot. 1 am about to 6inat out this project and i4 you wish to change the tabor and matet.fata boa this worth to the project, you shoutd do so ehottty. Contact me idien you ane heady to o.tden the pants and I au-tt secute a Putchaae Otde,t numbet Got you. gent Red 6 White South End AItc King Ctemie.t.s Atev Station Ra.i,uet Diaposat Sr S �r Au-r� �• .. �NIAJ�V� ! 1: %�J:f'L I• M sl ` l�F Re� v � ►I'- O PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT _ DESIGN/UTILITY ENGINEERING L15.2631 MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE SO. RENTON,WASH.U056 b eEP �fC SE ptEW' BARBARA V. SHINPOCH MAV011 November 29, .983 Cascade Septic Service Inc. P.O. Box 44010 Tacoma, WA 98444 Attention: Mr. Mark Perry, Vice President Subject: CAG 034-82, East Valley Road Meekly Statement of Working Days Dear Mark: Enclosed is the Weekly Statement of Working Days for the week ending November 25, 1983. Please note that there are 1; working days left on the contract as of November 25, 1983. Very truly yours, Donald G. Monaghan, P.E. Engineering Supervisor :jft Enclosure OF Ran+ 'L T U L PUBIC WORKS DEPARTMENT DESIGN/UTILITY ENGINEEWNG 0 235 263' O � � MUN1OIMl/UIIDING 100 Mill AV! SO RENTON WASH 98055 9 e P 1 rFp SE ptE BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR November 22. 1983 Cascade Septic Service, Inc. P.O. Box 44010 Tacoma, WA 98444 Attention: Mr. Mark Perry, Vice President Subject: Contrast CAG 034-82, Change Order No. 5 Dear Mark: Enclosed is a fully executed copy of the subject document for your records. Very truly yours, Donald G. Monaghan, P.E. Design Engineer :jft Enclosure OF it", PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT R F TRAFFIC ENGINEERING DIVISION 60235 2620 e MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 STILL AVE SO RENTON.e1ASN.9WU P rFD CE PtB� SARWA Y. SNINPOC„ MA,OR November .2, 1983 Mr- Mark Perry CascAde Septic Service, Inc . P•0, 8oA 44009 Tacoma, IA 98444 Subject. L. .0, No. �l6�- luminai r a Outages Dear Mr, Perry: A surveillance of the lighting system on L.I.D. No,following inoperative luminaires; 314 ha; revealed thr 1 . Luminaire 020. Sta. 74 + 60 on East Valley Road is out. 2. Lund nai re 02). Sto. 77 + 8L on East Valley Road is out. 3. Luminalre $17. Sta. 65 + 40 on East Valley Road is out. 4. Lumi nai re N15. Sta. S8 ♦ 90 on East Valley Roao Is out S. Luminaire a14. Sta. 55 + 00 on East Valley Road is out, 6. Luminaires 016, Ste. 37 + 90: a18, S u. 41 ♦ 70 and 020, Sta. 45 + ISO on SW 27tn Street are all out, (If the latter outages are related to the clock, the obseryatlon N me was 6:j0 a.m, ) Shen this Is eguiPment under warranty and acceptance of the lighting system by the City does not occur until the final estimate for the Project we request that the outages noted be corrected. is constituted, Very truly yours, Donald G. Monaqhan. P.- Design Engineer `J7 CEN!ad CC: Ed Taillefer c.a<.4E'E7i+R9 MMe a1 Me. •.O a O+0 ram---- tAQW^a wa9e++4 CS120018611.".1 San4-RT5.21% LID 314 TO _Charts• Order f5__ _ Don Monaghan ----'—'- City of Renton -------- Municipa; Building 200 Mill Avenue South —'- Renton, WA 98055 GENT;FMEN WE ARE SENDIN-- rOD XX AII.cNae UndnapuaNao.ar rM —.__. IMfollPwuplUm.. hepeul.r+d 6onlrM c"'al Ullp Pnnlll Ra1+4 Sp.aeKFflnn. SoIN"t ocl XX Chonq.0'", hwpa ONE"SEMI"As EPRY' cony'ncf — —�_— M4cNNww .— 1 1 10-28-8 _Change Order p5 on ina�. . TRESP ARE TRARSSMTTEOr aMMaA W.- Fw 4wo.0 Pei Ro...r.one Cemm.m Fa Spnam.. X.FW ryur YN APP.PrW a ro1N1 "Pon"O"gooil AS r.ou..NA Roiurna fm cawcnon. RNom enPT PW PRINTS RETURNED 4F7ER LOAN TO US l' SIGNED',. Mark Perry — •r-^.ufuTf 4'R R"6g v.•n. • _ . c rF W' OF RF 4. M PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ! DESIGN/UTILITY ENGINEERING 9 235-2631 MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 Mlll AVE.50. RENTON,WASIL MpEE d 0�P arFD SEPtc,A BARBARA Y. SHINPOCM MAYOR hove )er 18, 1983 Cascade Septic Service, Inc. P.O. Box 44010 .�.�ma, MA 98444 'ention: Mr. Marti Per., Subject: Meekly Stateme J. of Working Days CAG 034-82, East Valley Highway Dear Mark: Enclosed pliase find the Weekly Statement of Working Days for the week ending November 18, 1983. Please note there are 19 working days remaining on the con- tract as of Novt, r, 18, 1983. Very truly yours, Donald G. Monaghan, P.E. Design Engineer :jft Enclosure Cascade Septic Service,Inc. Novembet 15, 1983 Don Monaghan Citv of Renton Municipal Building 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 9805i RE: LID 313 Dear Don: Enclosed you will find a signed copy of Change Order 45. Again we are signing this under duress because ae do not agree with the City's position regarding nut palinq for markup on our subcontractors wor%. If I can be of any further service, please contact me, Yours trull'y, M� R. P�RR Vice President MRP:kd Enclosure J NOV 1 7 1W CITY OF RmM—IN but 1 of_L IM PUBLIC WORKS DEPAPENT _ qg� Rp 10/28/83 CHANGE ORDER Ofder RhOer 5 �1 OrhrW Or tglncer wdor ntr of ,t nn 4-1 of eM ._..1 Standard fyottflcattus (MU) bN rut No.CA0 O 4-82 Ckmg* propoacd by Cminctor To: Cascade Septic Service, Inc. P.O- Ron :40]n -don" by: cascade can Tacoma, WA 98444 pcmatt,4 rift jimme— I tt t--..yy. ;////.v_i silo wto Federal Md Me. Ills L�r i r -'�.E'1'':�X''<.•,— protect Title c-gent give,, by Soots: I.Atn wqg td) y • • • • • . • • • • • • DESCRIPTIOM or HORR . . . . . . . . . . . ou en ordered to perform the felloelng described wrt ,poo rtcript of aA approved copy of Mes :hang* ardor. See Sheet all .ors, sated '* and m be in aecord.,,. .Ith the Ptovlums of the Stmnd.rd Vpoe,hc.ttons and cpoct.l hover Iona for 'he rrpo of cenatructton mvolv.d. ORIGINAL cowmCT CURRENT CONTRACT ESTIMATED NET CHANGE ESSSlut[D CON7PM:T MOUNT ANDUIT THIS ORDER TQTAL ALTER CNAN�E s 4,026,581. 39 p 4,074,449.5w 1 IV, ;78.92 E 4,087,628.46 AUEMCY USE AGEnry USE APPROVAL REMWEADED OPROVED. I ltc nganeN —Vat— —'1 — ILL APnLNAL RECOMMENDED APPROVED DIM ICT TA re-A?a MONISM F t ORIGINAL CITY JF RENTON Ca.„e�, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT N ..Z CAG U34-R2 C MnN CHANGE ORDER ESTIMATE o.�« new _VI .B l83 N..r« S � [ftiMtta ' FSh Mt[0 i tag irPP As"I Ro. ro WMAE NICE C"NA C"mm SCHEDULE A-1 61 Bark CY 12.00 150 1,800.00 62 Concrete Extra Depth CY $5.50 15 1.282.50 63 High Early Concrete CY 3.50 20 . 70.00 SCHEDULE 8-1 70 Concrete Extra Depth CY 85.5(1 15 11282.SU 71 HSRh Eariv Concrete CY 3.50 20 70.00 I 72 Adjust Curb Rao i 1.5 460.36 LS 460.36 13 Storm Conflict, 5.::, d7th St. L.124.i1 1.S 1.124.09 74 Saw Cettina I.F ,67 2,00!) 1,340.00 75 Relocate CR I.S 370.52 Ly 370.52 76 Re lowta H,;d•t I'S 175.95 [.S 175.95 77 Remoaa High Spat in -ad LS 2.3)6.14 LS 2,336.14 SCHEDL'l.E H-0 JO Move street light Wtreb I.S )25.00 fS 925,00 SCHEDULE B-JJ I :8 Rainier Side Sewer LS 800.00 800.00 l9 I ( Delay Due to Conflict With Sever 4 Water at S.W. 19th St. Lh 11141.8b 1S 1,141.86 i � I I f :c.attd�ttYea /(AKIt 'r'Y i.al.t.a.s. e63rl To ase►sAtf_t.Ia w eweM n�n.•w v • et!w6M tdeMk.►etN+ev N.Nt. Cnoervriteav nt i.ic Landon NOTICE OF CANCELLATION a,.10 cion. i9 W TIC6 MAI�90 TO 1 °u Cesteds Static Servicv, trt. . ES AL e P.O. Box "010 z logo", Washin;can 9w+" L. to rAe[ 6YT eCi :r ONh �MlULD AT GANttii.A t ICY NUtNeR 1 AT NVCN SC 1i437 LL ki rklanS, Waaniastun .a O. A v. YT•NDAMD T.MC �tl ♦: Yf\11 Company Request �U ARr NrVoVV "a,jer, TM AT rN4 AeOVt P (Cr M Nt R61T fANft4Lt IN AC�.::RPANC4 "IT" Tne >ND.TION$ of rNr PO4KY SAID CANCZC ATIUN TO INC 6"C"'VT C,N AND ArTrR rNi Nf:UR AND DArk ,TNrwNeD AeOVe ,4r Let M%PA.D PR!'MIUM AeOVt TNL*NO RA'A PRCMIUM n)A rMt t•iMRrD 'kRM +IT NW .tNDGRr.D wu. 4truND6D UPON D6MAI.D re �1 �'' City of Renton Ct /{ vr' te i p Public Works Dept. A `= 100 Mill Ave. S. � Renton, We. 03055 Attn: !You Monahan MAIL Iwo COPY 10.N►URGD pF kp PUBLIC WORKS [DEPARTMENT 7. DESIGNiUTit lTv ENGINEERING 0 235-2631 oaaY �F MUNICIPAL/UILOING 200MILLAVE.110 RENTON.WASN 98056 c 4C �rEO SE itE� BARBARA v SMINpOCm MAYOR November 14, 1983 Cascade Septic Se,vice Inc. P.U. Box 44010 Tacoma, VA 98444 Re: L.I .U. 314, CAG .32-82 Dear Mark: As you are aware, there is not much time remaining on your contract for the abuve-referenced project. There ix, however, a great deal of wort that remains to be completed within this time period. Would you please advise how you propose to pursue this work In order to be completed on time. Very truly yours, Donald G. Monaghan, P.E. Design Engineer DGM:j f t of RFC v i PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT DESIGN/UTILITY ENGINEERING 0 235 2631 z � F MUNICIPAL BUILDING 700 MILL AVE.$O. RENTON,WASH.9/06ti e LP CEO SE PtE BAR3ARA v SNINPJCN MAYOR November 14, 1983 Cascade Septic Service Inc. P.O. Box 44010 Tacoma, WA 98444 Re: Weekly Statement of Working Days Contract CAG 034-82, East Valley Hwy. Dear Mark: Enclosed is the Weekly Statement of Working Days for the week ending November 11, 1983. Please note here are 24 working days remaining on the contract as Of NJVember 11, 1983. Very truly ;ours, Donald G. Monaghan, ".E. Lesign Engineer :jft Enclosure OF RF tiT ° PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Z DESIGN/UTILITY ENGINEERING 0 235.2631 O9 $ MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE.SO. RFNTON.WASH.SF066 0 EP 1rEC SE P1E0 BARBARA Y, SHINPOCH MAYOR November 4, 1983 Cascade Septic Service, Inc. P.O. Box 44010 Tacoma, W4 98444 Re: LAG 034-82, E.I.C. 314, East Valley Highway Weekly Statement of Working Days Gentlemen: Enclosed is the Weekly Statement of Working Days for the week ending November 4, 1983. Please note there are 28 working days left on the contract. Very truly yours, Donald G. Monaghan, P.E. Design Engineer :jfz Enclosure MEMORANDUM TO Clint Morgan IATE I. a, FROM Uon•Mbnayhan SUBJECT L.I.O. 314 Clint, please delete Items 10, 11 and 12 from punch list items f.om your letter of October 24, 1983 to Cascade Septic Servict, Inc. :jft OF IpE, °z PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT DES�GNi UTit [Ty ENGiNEEWNG 0 235-2631 MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE.SO, RENTON,WASH,98056 b 1�ED SE D1 E^ RARSARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR November 1, 1983 Lascade Septic Service Inc. P.O. Box 44010 Tacoma, WA 98444 Attention: Mr. Mark Perry Re: CAG 034-82, L.I.D. No. East Valley Highway Dear Mark: Per our previous discussion enclosed is a copy of Change Order No. 4 which has been revised. Also enclosed is Change ^rder No. 8 fnr execution. Please return Change Order No. 9 after you have executed it for further processing. Change Order No. G should be forthcoming shortly. Very truly yours, Donald G. Monaghan, P.E. Design Engineer :jft Enclosures Of RFC PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT RICHARD C HOIIGHTON • DIRECTOR n g MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE SO RENTON,WASH.9066 P 206 235 869 �TFO SE D�E� BARBARA Y. SHiNPOC4 MAYOR November 1 , 1983 Mr. Malk Perry Cascade Septic Service, Inc. P.O. Bon 44009 Tacoma, WA 98444 Subject: L.I.D. No. 314 -- Seven-Day Clock SG 16th Street S Lind Ave. SW Dear Mr. Perry: The seven-day clock 1- the street light control cabinet at the inter- section of Lind Ave, SW 6 SW 16th Street appears to have quit functioning. Since this is an item under warranty and acceptance of the lighting system by the City does not occur until the final estimate for the project is constituted, we request that the discrepancy noted be corrected. Very truly yours, Donald G. Monaghan, P.E. Design Engineer CEM:ad cc: Don Monaghan Ed Taillefer tlf Rp A.41 1 -� PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT It DESIGN UTILITY ENGINEERING 0 235 [b3' ¢' MUNICIPAL 8U1lDING 200 hell AVE.SO. RENTON.WASH 9WS �9 a P �rEO gPtE* BARBARA Y. SHINOOCH MAYOR October 31, 1983 Cascade Septic Service Inc. P.O. Box 440lu Tacoma, WA 98444 Re; Contract CAG 034-82. East Valley Highway LID 314, Weekly Statement of Wtrking Days Dear Mark: Enclosed is the Weekly Statement of Working Days on the subject contract for the week ending October 28. 1583. Please note there are 32.5 working days left on this con- tract as of last Friday. Very truly yours, Donald G. Monaghan, P.E. Design Engineer :jft Enclosure pF RFC J 7 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT TRAFFIC UiGINEERING DIVISION • 235 2620 �q, g MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE SO. RENTON,WASH.98055 "9 e�EP ,rEO SEP' BARBARA y, SHINPOCH MAYOR October 24, 1983 Mr. Mark Perry Cascade Septic Service, Inc. P.O. Box 44009 Tacoma, WA 98444 Subject: L.I.D. No. 314 Inspection Items Street Lighting 6 Traffic Signals Dear Mr. Perry: After review of our inspection list dated September 12, 1983, and October 5, 1983, the following are the only discrepancies remaining. 1 . Service cabinet at SW 34th Street 6 East Valley Road - Contactor relay makes a very loud buzz indicating the contactor relay points need cleaning, 2. Pole P7 has a broken corner on the concrete pad. 3. Intersection of SW 16th L Lind Ave. SW - luminaires on the traffic signal poles do not appear to have been leveled. 4. Intersection of SW 16th St. 6 Lind Ave. SW - Paint scratched on lighting service cabinet. 5. SW 27th St. between East Valley Road L Lind Ave. SW - Pole No. 15 needs the shaft cleaned of concrete. 6. SW 27th ',t. between East Valley Road and Lind Ave. SW - Pole No. 17 needs the shaft cleaned of concrete. 7. 'ith St. between East Valley RoaC and Lind Ave. SW - Pole 19 needs concrete cleaned from the shaft. S. SW 27th St. between East Valley and Lind Ave, SW - Junction boxes for lighting ronduit street crossings do not have I-foot perimeter concrete pad 4 inches thick. 9. SW 19th St. from Lind Ave. SW to East Valley Road - Toich-up Paint needed for system service cabinet. Mr, Mask Perry Page 2 October 24, 1583 10. SW 13th St. from Lind Ave. SW to East Valley Road - Pole A concrete pad for pole and junction box missing. 11 . SW 19th St. from Lind Ave. SW to East Valley Road - Pole 010 no concrete pad over foundation and around junction box. 12. SW 19th St. from Lind Ave. SW to East Vailey Road - opposite side of road from pole #10 junction box does not have enough fill dirt arour.l box in back side. 13. SW 19th St. from Lind Ave. SW to East Valley Road - Pole M13 concrete pad incomplete - pole needs cleaning on the shaft. General ttems/SW 19th St. from Lind to East Valley Road 14. Smooth out the dirt around the concrete pads and junction boxes. 15. Junction boxes for lighting conduit street crossings do not have I-foot perimeter concrete pad 4 inches thick, 16. SW 27th St, from Oakesdale Ave. SW to Lind Avt. SW - C-type junction box west of luminaire No. I at intersection with future Oakesdale Ave. needs fill dirt around box. 17. SW 27th St. from Oakesdale Ave. SW to Lind Ave. SW - Pole d6 junction box adjacent to pole has 3 corduits too high. 18. SW 27th St. from Oakesdale Ave. SW to Lind Ave. SW - Pole p9 needs cleaning. General Items/SW 27th St. from Oakesdale to Lind: 19. Touch-up paint on the service cabinet located at Lind Ave. SW. 20. Circuit megger test is not acceptable (cabinet at SW 27th St. 6 Lind Ave. SW) . 21. Smooth dirt out around concrete pads. 22. Junction boxes for lighting conduit street crossings do not have 1-foot perimeter concrete pad 4 inches thick. 23. Paint striping and lane buttons end about Station 15 + 50. They should be extended to Station 11 + 00. Mr. Mark Perry Page 3 October 24. 1983 When these items have been addressed, please let us know. This will conclude the street lighting and Traffic signal inspection. Very truly yours, Gary A IWrris, P.E. Traffic Engineer CEM;ad cc: Don Monaghan Eo iai!lefer YY' kp PUBLIC WORKS DEPA"TMENT DESIGN/UTILITY ENGINEERING • 235-2631 AUNICIPAL WILDING 200 MILL AVE.SO. RENTON.W4SH.99050 Pa `4,rEn cE vtEU'�< BARBARA Y. SMINPOCN MAYOR October 21. 1983 Cascade Septic Service, Inc. P.O. Box 44010 Tacoma, WA 98444 Re: CAG 034-82, Weekly Statement of Working Days Dear Mark: losed please find the Weekly Statement of Working Days for week ending October 21, 1983• Please note that there are 37-1/2 days reme lninq on the con- tract. Very truly yours, Donald G. Monaghan, P.E. Design Engineer DGM.jft Enclosure pF R6',1 U 7. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT RICHARD C HOUGHTON • DIRECTOR F MUNICIPAL tlVILDING 300 MILL AVE SO RE NTON,WASH.01111065 P` 206 235 256A TED SEP"E� SAMARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR October 21 , 1983 Mr, Mark Perry Cascade Septic Service, Inc. P.O. Box 44009 Tacoma, WA 98444 Subject: LID No. 314 - Thermoplastic Traffic Arrows Dear Mr. Perry: On the south leg of the intersection of Lind Ave. SW 6 SW 16th Street the project drawings do not include the thermoplastic traffic arrows and the word 'only" in the left turn pocket. We wish to express our desire to have the arrows and word installed at this time as shown on the atta,,hed drawing marked in red. The Item will be counted into the proi:ct at unit price bid. We noticed at the intersecthon of SW .2th Street and Lind Ave. SW on the westerly leg that the '.hermoplastic arrow at the beginning of the left turn pocket was missing as of October 11, 1983. The 9-3/4 inch buttons for the left turn Pocket were also missing at that time. Please initiate completion of these items. Very truly yours, i JDonald . Monaghan, P.E, Design ngineer CEM:ad Attachment cc: G. Norris I 'o i ! ! • Motch Lim a•. /1•♦00•' tip T1Y. NMN MtiY4w M• M � w a No ita 1 N+HO ll••rIN• SMN Id ar r >.� ... 4 S.W. 16th *ttNt p t ! ! • Motch Lim a•. /1•♦00•' tip T1Y. NMN MtiY4w M• M � w a No ita 1 N+HO ll••rIN• SMN Id ar r >.� ... 4 S.W. 16th *ttNt p t OF RED J PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT DE SIGN. UT 1 tNGiNfER1NL, • 215 2831 cell �' MUNICIPAL BUILDING ZOO WILL AVE f0 Rf NiON,WASH fg66 t3 -i` S� b �rED sE P1 E� BARBARA y. SMINPOCN MAYOR October 18, 1983 Cascade Septic Service, Inc. P.O. Box 44010 Tacoma, WA 98444 Attention: Mr. Mark Perry Re: Meekly Statement of Workinq Days CAC 034-82, L.I .D. 314 Dear Mark: Enclosed Is the Weekly Statement of Working Days for the week ending October 14, 1983. Tease note there are 42.5 working days left on the contract as of October 14, 1983• Very truly yours, Donald G. Monaghan, P.E. Design Engineer DGM:jft Enclosure AF Re PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT U M Z OF.SIGN NTIU TV ENGINEERING • 735 :631 MUNICIPAL BUILDING 211111 MILL AVE.$0. MENTON.WASH gtlDbb b 9tS +rfD SEPAtol BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAVOB October 18, 1983 Lascade Septic Systems, Inc. P.O. Box 44010 Tacoma, VA 98444 Attention: Mr, Mark Perry Subject: Driveways - S.V. 27th Street Dear Mark: In accordance with my letter of October 3, 1983 and verbal direction to Ed on October 14, 1983, rou are hereby directed to remove the existing curb, gutter and si.tewalk and install three 30-foot driveways at Station 34+86, 38+36 and 42+36. All work will be paid for at unit prices except for the side- walk removal which will be paid for of a time and matcrlal basis. Please advise when this work will be scheduled. Very truly yours, Donald G. Monaghan, P.E. Design Engineer 00M:3ft Invoice No3332 CITY OF RENTON 200 MILL AVENUE SOUTH RENTON, WASHINGTON90053 Department or Division Date— i �• Please ��••ke checks pays. 0 tc Finance Department City of Renton L v i �011��3 q Total Due k]f kF +E! .► �. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT DFSIGNiJTII.iTv ENGINEERING 0 235 263I r MUNICIPAL RUII DING 200 M't LAVE SO RENTON,WASH 9906h tP 'E0 SEptE� BARBARA Y. SHiNPOCH MAYOR October 10, 1983 Cascade Septic Service, Inc. P.O. Box 44010 Tacoma, WA 98444 Attention: Mr. Mark Perry Subject: Meekly Statement of working Days CAG o34-82, E.I.D. 314 Dear Mark: Enclosed please find the weekly Statement of working Days for the week ending October 7, 1983, Please note that there are 47.5 working days remaining on the contract. Very truly yours, Donald G. Monaghan, P.E. Design Engineer UGM:jft Enclosure OF RA. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT DESIGN'UTILITY INU,NtEH�NG 0 235 2631 ,7 MUNICIPAL BUILDING IOOM{LL AVE SO REM ION,WASH 9WS5 ,, e '�lfO tiEvtEM��55 P 8AR8ARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR OcroL,r 10, 1983 Mr. Roy Yeallend Mobil oil Co. 1711 - 13th Ave. S.Y. Seattle, VA 98134 Re: L.I.D. 314 Dear Mr. Neeklend: Enclosed please find a Copy of the assessment breakdown for Mobil Oil's property on Lind Avenue S.N. The area sham shaded on the attached sketch Is the property in question. Also, the specific assessment rates for the Individual specific Improvements is enclosed. If yuu require any additional Information or wish to discuss this further, please advise. Very truly yours, Donald G. Monaghan, F.E. Design Engineer DGM:J f t Enclosures OF aE ti � r PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT V TRAFFIC ENGINEERING DIVISION • 235-A20 � F MUNICIPAL aUg01N0 700 MILL AVE SO RENfCWv WASH 9E066 e .Ee r►� SE►T`w,r BARBAMA Y. SNINPOCN MAYCO Octobtr 5. 98i Mr. Mark Perry Cascade Septic Service, Inc. P.O. Box 44009 TacN,a, WA 98444 Subject: L.I.D. No. 3I4 Preliminary Lighting and Signal Overhead Inspection Dear Mr. Perry: We are atta-hang the Inspection list of Items for the following locations: a) Traffic signal overhead - intersection of SW 16th St. and Lind Ave. SW b) Street lighting - SW 19th St, between Lind and East Valley Road c) Street lighting - SW 27th St. between Oakesdale and Lind Ave. SW, When the attached Inspection items have been corrected, please let us know and we will clear the Items listed. Very truly yours, ,AJAGary Allrris, P.E. Traffic Engineer CEM:ad Attachments cc: 'ton Ed Taillefer L.I.D. NO. ]IA TRAFFIC SIGNAL INSPECTION SN 16TN STREET s LIND AVE. SW (Overhead Inspection Only) Traffic signal Dole on the northwest corner - the vehicular signal heal nearest the curb has stripped terminal strip threads on the oA.aslde of the red lamp. L.I.D. NO. 314 STREET LIGHT INSPECTION SW 19TH STREET (Lind Ac- SW to East Valley Road) Lumi nai re Ntxe4er Touch up paint on lighting service cabinet. Two wires loose Inside service cabinet. • C•type junction box in front of service cabinet has j-conduits too high, Existing junction box on Lind Ave. SW, west side, at crossing needs fill dirt around box and lid replaced, (Crossing south side of SW 19th Street "T" intersection ) 1 a) Nut covers missing at base of pole over anchor bolts. b) Grout missing between pole base and foundation. c) Inside pole handhole, circuit has plastic screw on splice connect. Splice connectors of plastic are not acceptable. d) Threads on anchor bolts do not extend above nuts. 8 Same as pole 7 above, items a and b. Concrete pad for pole and junction box missing. Junction box opposite side of street from pole No. 2 has too much dirt in box and cover lid hooks bent. 9 Same as pole 7, items a and b. Htwk bent on adjacent junction box cover. 10 54me as pole 7, items a and b. No concrete pad over foundation and around junction box. Opposite side of street from pole No. 10 junction box does not have enough fill dirt around box, Also, no concrete pad around perimeter of box. 11 Same as pole 7 above, Items a and b. Threads .}n anchor bolts do not extend above nut. Street Light Inspection SW 19th Street Page 2 Luminalre Number 12 Same as bole 1 above, items a and b, OppoSite si4e of eIreet from pole No. 12 junction box has wrong name on lid. 13 e) Concrete pad over foundation missing. 0 t :ut tatwu�� 10 base and foundation missing, c) Mead a. anchor bolts do not extend above nut. d) Pcle needs cleaning, General Items: I . Smooth out the dirt around the junction boxes and concrete pads. 2. Leval all luminaires. L.I .D. NO, 314 STREET LIGN1 INSPECTION SW 27TH STREET (Oakesdale Ave. SW to Lind Ave. SW) October ), 1983 Luminaire Numbe r I a) Nut covers missing at base of pole over anchor bolts. b) Grout missing between pole base and foundation. c) Level luminalre heads. - C-typc junction box west of luminaire No. I at intersection with future Oakesdale Ave, needs fill dirt around box. 2 a) Same as pole 1, Items a, b and c above. J a) Same as pole 1, items a, b and c above. b) One conduit too high In junction box adjacent to pole. c) Opposite side of street, junction box lid is missing. Also, concrete pad 4" thick and I foot perimeter from around box is missing. 4 a) Same as pole I, items a, Is and c abor_. 5 a) Same as pole 1, Items a, b and c above. b) Conductor insulation broken inside junction box adjacent to pole. - Junction box opposite side of street from pole 5 above has )-conduits too high. Also. I-foot perimeter concrete pad 4" thick is missirq from around junction box. 6 a) Same as pole 1, Items a, b and c above. b) Junction box adjacent to pole has j-condults top high. 7 a) Same as pole 1, items a, b and c. Junction box opposite side of street from pole 7 above has (-conduits too high. Also, I-foot Perimeter concrete pad 4" thick Is missing from around junction box. 8 Grout missing between pole base and foundation. Street Light Inspection SW 27th Street Page 2 Lumi nai re Number 9 a) Grout missing between pole base and foundation. b) Pole needs cleaning at bottom section. - Junction box opposite side of street from pole 9 above has conduit too high. Also, 1-foot perimeter concrete pad 4" thick is missing from around the junction box. 10 Grout missing between pule base and foundation, 11 Grout missing between pole base and foundation. - Junction box opposite side of street from pole It above has 7-conduits too high. Also 1-foot perimeter concrete pad 4" thick is missinq from around the junction box, 12 Grout missing between pole and foundation. 13 Grout missing between pole and foundation. General Items: 14. Level all heads 1 thru 13. 15. Circuits nagger zero. Should be 8 - megohms. Cabinet at SW 27th Street f, Lind Ave, SW. 16, Touch up paint on service cabinet. 17. When complete, up light all junction box lids. I8• Smooth dirt out around concrete pads. of Rsti ,t A OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY• RENTON,WASHINGTON � O !!U 2 ro..o.•.n w••.• ,te •...,•+u• • �..v. «.a-+o.a• wor•. .•e wn j LAWRENCE 1 WARREN C DANIEL KELLOGG, ••un... Pa•.•e«' DAV ID M DEAN .ari...• El...111 1 MARK E BARDER. .•un..• t•�.•*w.•• 40 wns ZANETTA L rONTES. C.....a..• Septem�er 30, 1981 MARTHAAFRENCH ••>• —' •^t.+• John F. Hansler Talack, Hansler, Hulscher, Burrows Davhoff 6 Barline Attorneys at Law First Interstate Plaza 1201 Pacific Avenue. Suite 1600 Tacoma, Washington, 98402 Re: Cascade Septic Service - LID 0314 Sanitary Sever Lift Station Dear Mr. Hensler : Your letter of July 22, 1983 addressed to Mr. Donald C. Monaghan of the City of Renton has been handed to me for response. I note the position in your letter that your client should have the right to claim a 151. profit and over- head on change order No. 4 As stated in your letter there is no question that these items were extras and that thev were handled under the 1977 APWA specificiations. Those specifications allow change orders to be done by the quantity bid items or agreed amount , or force account. Your letter is correct in stating that APWA spec 9-104 entitled Force Account , is the appropriate section to consider. Looking first to labor, section 9-1 .041 details how labor is to be paid. The labor is to include the prevailing wage rate plus fringe benefits, travel allowance, industrial insurance and medical aid premiums, and overhead and profit . The sub-contractor that your client hired charged the City all of those items. There is no inclusion in the Force Account section for labor that includes an additional override for general contractor profit . Your letter claims that. for materials and equipment the contractor gets cost plus 15% for overhead and profit . Both the material section, which is section 2 and John F. Hensler Page 2 Seot 30. 1983 the equiprent section, which is section 1, do provide for 15'. That amount was charged in each instance by the sub- contractor. It is my understanding of force account work that the City directs the contractor to do certain work. It is also try understanding that your client decided to subcontr: that work. However, the City did not agree to permit yo,. client to take profit on profit which is in effect a compounded profit . If your argument is correct, the City would be paying 201 on 120% (the underlyinµ subcontractor's 100% charge plus 20%) for a 1447, figure rather than the . 20". invisioned by the force account specification, Such a result was clearly not intended by the APWA specs . If you seriously contest my position, 1 would request that you point out to me where in the APWA specs the compounded profit is permitted. I also note in your letter that you have sought to have Mark Perm designated as your arbitrator. Ile is apparently one of the principals in Cas.ade Septic Service, Inc. If arbitration is necessary, then the City of Renton will appoint Mr. Richard Houghton as its arbitrator. I would also suggest that you and I discuss submitting the single issue to the panel by stipulation, allow the panel to review the APWA specifications and the contract documents and tell us who has correctly interpreted the contract . Very truly vours, Lawrence J. Warren LJW.nd cc . Mayor Richard Houghton uF xF =• ta PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT UESSGN Jh,, is ENGINEERINo • .'�` .'��' n Mt3[IICIPAt BUILDING MOMILL AVE $0. PENTON AASR %80:: � b M p rFpet) %f prE ^k, BARBARA y_ SNihPOCM MAYOR Octo,or 3 1983 cascaae Septic Services, Inc. 0. Box 44010 t ot.Aa, WA 99444 Attention: Mr. Mark Perry Subjact: L.I.D. 314. CAG 034-81, Meekly Stateewnt of Working Days Dear Mark: Enclosed is the Weekly Stateownt of Working Days for tfe period ending September 30, 1983 Please note that there are 52-1/3 working days left on the contract as of September 30, 1983. Very truly your%. Donald 5. Monaghan, P.E. Oesign Engineer DGM+jft Enclosure Of Rp � -1T PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT x DESIGN/UTILITY ENGINEERING 0 235 2631 n ✓� MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE.SO RENTON.WASH.9111035 v P 'Fn BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR October 4, 1983 Cascade Septic Service, Inc. P.O. Box 44010 Tacoma, YA 98444 Attention: Mr, Mark Perry Subject: L.I .D. 314. CAG 034-82, Eat; Valley Highway Dear Mark: As you are aware, the project Is rapidly coming to a close. You have indicated a number of times that there are discrepancies in the quan- tities which only Ed, Steve and Martin can resolve. 1 have advised Martin that this Is an Item of significant Importance and to resolve these items with Ed and Steve. he has advised that he has had diffi- culty securing a commitment from Ed and Steve to sit down and resolve these matters. Your assistance in this matter would be appreciated. Very truly yours, Donald G. Monaghan, P.E. ptsign Engineer DGM:j ft kit RE• t-y 1 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT y LASIGN/UTILITY ENGINEERING 0 235 2631 n A� MUNICIPAL BUILDING 40 MILL AVE SO. RENTON.WASH M65 u Cp a rEO SE PtE� BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR October 3, 1983 Cosecade Septic Service, Inc. P.O. Box 44010 Tacoma, WA 98444 Attention: Mr. Nark Perry subject: Driveway - S.W. 27th Street Dear Hark: Regarding your letter of September 29, 1983, it is necessary that the driveways In Question on S.W. 27th St. be Installed. As you have not completed your concrete work on the project, 1 see no reasun to deviate from unit prices. As for the sidewalk removal, as you are aware, there is no unit price. Therefore, please advise what the price will be per lineal foot for sidewalk removal and disposal. Pleas* r"pund Immediately so that the work can proceed. Very truly yours, Donald G. Monaghan, P.E. Design Engineer DGM:jft y'+� -� Cascade Sepik Service,Inc. September 29, 1983 Don Monaghan Cit_v of Renton Mur' .ipal Building 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 RE: LID 314 - City of Renton Dear Don: It has come to my attention that you are requesting that we remove some curb and sidewalk on 21th in order to put some curb cuts into Puget Powers property. The existing work was installed per the stakes provided by the City of Renton. It is not economically feasible to do this work under the existing bid items. In accordance with the contract, we will not proceed with this work until there is r mutua'ly agreed upon price. Force account work is not a viable alternative due to the already existing dispute over the method of - he City of Rentons payment of force account. If I can be of any further service, please contact me. Yours trt ly,,, 7�J /�/L7 MARK PERRY Vice Presfdonr MP:kd Cascade Septic Service,Inc. Septemt'er .'v, lo9t jesr r.+a r Don Monaghan City of Renton SEP 3 0 19,83 Municipal Building 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 RE, LID 314 Dear Don: The purpose of this letter is to review the meeting which was held in your office regarding clearup items for the above named job. 1. There are some fire hydrants that have been installed by Cascade that were purchased from Pacific States l,nger tbn^ the standard specified lenth of 4. 5 L.f. . It is my understanding that I am to get the invoice from Pacific States to Martin si that Martin and Ed can square up on where thev were installed so we may be reimbursed for them. 2. We are to raise the existing hydrant on the corner of 16th and Lind. 3. Martin is to supply us with a list of the areas to be hydra-aeeded. 4. We have the City's permission to remove the job shack and fence so that we can finish cleaning up the site. 5. We can schedule KASPAC. to finish up the balance of the striping and buttons as soon as Segale has sealed the overlav on the intersection at 16th and Lind. 6. In review of Change order N5, Item A3-29 illuminatiun wire, the City is going to add 157, to Canem's gt.ote. Item B1-73, an additiona. $187.00 will be added for the storm conflict Item B4-37., a 15. mark-up will be added to Canem's quote. Item B4-33, Canem's request for compensation for moving the D-Box is rejected on the basis that the invoice.; supplied show five J-Boxes, not one, as was installed. Regarding the items that Cascade Septic Service, Inc. has filed for arbitration, the compensation for Puget Powers costs and 15% overhead and markup or subcontractors work, that the City has offered to pav for Puget Powers invoices but not pay any markup on the subcontractors. This proposal is unacceptable to us, therefore, I &Rain request that you name the Citv of Renton's arbitrator so that we can get these issues resolved as quickly as possible. If I can be of any further service, please contact me. Your truly, MARK PERRY Vice President MP kd , Q=Q ....N. _-1 " "" ' IGpMpANtES AW OWUING fO',EWALES Comfort � Fleming Ins. r p.o. Box 5387 A United Pacific Tacoma WA 98405 B Lloyds of London a C integrity _ CaeCade Septic Service, Inc- P.O. P.O. Box 44010 Tacoma, Nor 98444 _ —. . ._- _..... ... E Haar �'+.sw+.YrRri.newsr.Rd.WdclN�nwRd.RdtudMlx.iI�MR"""Mir6m��_-�*�roYXx limmillv a•�°�« �n"!'Aa.,m miRr --ZTmT>^i oTSTR'61Si1 «� T� d KYM«wr wFa.RR ' 1 (� Ug4474K341 10-01-84 ,nc no aaw r f ,wuN,.N, ••X '• hfl "MI ... � � HI.;iw..1R � E 500 ° CP4 ,. - °rpEpjgE[ telnt rtr_t. 474E iR 10-01-84 • A x e S00 X x F•u,., ro-01-84 110,000 - e ISX902271 . WORKERS iJYpFnSKnON ,Rd EfM4U1FW5 tiAMV•' gfN1a B BROAD FORM 15937LL 10-01-84 As respects: Ltd 314 - East Valley Rd Additional insured endorsement attached _' a•. t OIREa�WtlM ,_� y.• IPe aP w City of 1kenton Public Works Dept. t 100 Mill Ave. S. Renton, We 99059 r1I Attn: Ban Monahan s.F. FORK FORK swat (Rtt.INt) ENDORSEMENT 10-01-•R3 �•• PER THE ATTACHED CERTIFICATE•`•••••• Cascade_ septic Service, Inc-- •••-••• w••» Comfort Belem nq Tacoma, Washington CM••x•t�N1N•Nwr tttWhMVra1N trNttlN Nh Mt,,.r txNtNYt11r 10-01-83 10-01-84 10-01-83 wt Or wPx• ti MONK _ Vr.NH O �1MgS. .. N1yw Mlxx _ K IT IS HEREBY UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED THAT IKR ff.A ffff, ff t e�'p .«a a>a: ��, e• o-'` c�,F c+'a p 6'd4Y fi a F� ,A.A ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ IS CORRECTED OR CHANGED TO READ AS FOLLOWS City of Rent Is added as additional insured but Only as respects their interest in: [.ID 314 Subject to the standard policy limitations, conditions and exclusions. •b,m.m by r.w•.e •C�n,m, hr. r.,w •NW rryuiml unk,.Pu kY hY ,hi,enAor..mmr POAOAIW September 20, 1983 MMGT-1183-CAUS Mr. Richard C. Houghton Director of Public Works City of Renton Municti,al building kentun, WA. 98055 Attention: D. G. Monaghan Subject: L.I.D. 314, Assessment Parcel l9 Modifications of Proposed lmprovaments materials Management Complex She following is in reference to my letter of September 17, 1982 in which I requested that additional curb cuts and sidewalk be included to the scope of work of L.I.D. 114 in order to conform to our planned development of the site. We have had opportunity to inspect the L.I.D. construction project and note that the requested sidewalk was installed as requested along S.W. 27th Street but the three (3) requested curb cuts at Stations 34+86, 38+36 and 42+36 were not constructed. Since my letter authorized the inclusion of the sidewalk with curb cuts into our L.I.D. assessment we would be opposed to paying this increased assessment for only partial camplotinn of the work. May we piesae have an explanation why the curb cuts were not installed a�yn\�<�I/)yJwhat rrective actiod will be taken to remedy this attuation. `Ma�F�iUB Property Develop nt DC:cf t)V R'4 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT OCSIGN/1.1% ITY ENGINEERING 0 235 2631 (i . } MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE SO. RENTON,WASH.9e01% b E� rEo sevts'� BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH AMA VOM September 23, 1983 Cascade Septic Service, Inc. P.O. Box 44010 Tacoma, WA 98444 Attention: Mr. Mark Perry Subject: Meekly Statement of Working Days L.I .D. 314, East Valley Highway, CAG 034-82 Dear Mark: Enclosed are the Weekly Statements of Working Days for the weeks ending September 16 and September 23, 1983 for your records. Very truly yours, Donald G. Monaghan, P.E. Design Engineer DGM:jft Enclosures GARY MERLINO CONSTRUCTION CO. General Conlrocbny 9125- lotti Av 98104 September 1, 1983 Mr. Don Monaghan, P.E. City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 RE: Renton LID 314 Dear Don: As you know, your contractor built sidewalks along a substantial portion of our East Waller Road parcel that lies on the east aide of the street ,Just north of SE 27th Street. We refuse to pay any assessment for this sidewalk. As i mentioned to You during our meeting this Tuesday. Cary Merlin personally told both you and vour field inspector that he did not went the sidewalk built. In April when sidewalk forms showed on site. Cary again requested that it not he installed. Despite these requests, the sidewalk was built anyway. Aft the north terminus of the sidewalk along this portion of fast Valley Road, this sidewalk does not benefit the parcel, which is not being used. The sidewalks to he constructed as part of the L.I.D. were to be built at the option of the owners of adjacent properties, the option providing .justification for direct assessment against the adjacent proper- ties. Cary made his decision that he did not went the sidewalk now quite clear to you and the inspector. Please make sure that our parcel is not Assessed for the construction of the sidewalk when you prepare the final assessment roll. Sincerely, David L. Halinern, P.E. Engineer f:ARY MERLIRO CON 4RVCTICN CO. DLH:lah of RFC u z PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Z OESIGNiUT R.iTv ENGINEERING 0 :35 :63 P ' A MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE.SO. RENTON.WASH 9e056 e ,rEO SEP's- BARRARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR September 19, 1983 Gary Merlin Construction Co. 9125 _ 10th Ave. South Seattle, VA 98108 Attention: Mr. David L. Hallnen, P.E., Engineer Subject: L.I.D. 314 Dear Dave: In response to your letter of September I, 1983, 1 think It Is important to point out that a misunderstanding regarding property Ownership is to blame for the problem regarding the sidewalk in question. As you pointed out. Gary had requested that sidewalks not be installed in front of his property. However, he never pointed out that 'e plans were in error and that the West Coast Truck Lines y. ,.s in reality his property. Although it is unfortunate that this misunderstanding occurred, I cannot agree that the property does not receive any benefits from the installatiun of the sidewalks in question. Therefore, it would be inappropriate to delete it when computing the assessment for the parcel . If you do not agree with my decision, you have the right to pursur It further at the staff level . If that fails, you can Also appeal to the City Council at the Public Mooring when they sit as a Board of Adjustment. If 1 can be of any further assistance, please advise. Very truly yours, Donald G. Monaghan, P.E. Design Engineer DGM:jft OF RE I a z PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT g 'RAPF:C Cn�vEERihS p,JS,vN • 235 2620 i" ± ✓R MUNICIPAL BUILDING .00 MILL AVE lO MINION VIASM loss P ,to sEaslo" BARBARA V. SMINPOCH MAYOR September IL, 1983 Mr. Nark Perry Cascade Septic Service, Inc. ►.o, boa 44009 Tacoma, WA 98444 Subject: LID No. 314 -- East Valley load Preliminary lighting and Signal Inspection Dear Mr. Perry: We are attaching the inspection lists for street lighting for East Valley Road; SW 16th Street from Lind Ave. SW to East Valley Road and for SW 27th Street from Lind to East Valley Road. The traffic signal at the intersection of Lind Ave. Su 6 SW 160 Street has some changes to he made before our inspectiot is to be completed. Mote comments on the attached preliminary check of the vehicle heads. When the enclosed inspection lists have been corrected, please Let us know and we will clear the items listed. Very truly yours, Gary A, rris, R.E. Traffic Engineer CEM:ad Attachments cc N1 6 dIn Ralston Ed Taillefer LID 40. )IA STREET LIGHT INSPECTION EAST VALLEY ROAD SEPTEMBER II, 1883 Luminaire No. 1, a) Code ground conductor green? (inside pole and adjacent junctior box) use 6 inches of green tape. bi Ground conductor loose inside pole. 2. a) Light doesn't come on. b) Ground wire loose in pole. c) Code ground conductor (pole and J-bOx) green. 3. a) Pole junction box conduit high, b) Code ground conducto, (junction box 6 pole) . k, a) Luminaire head needs to be leveled. b) Code ground conductor green (pole c J-box). 5. a) Luminaire head needs to be leveled. b) Code ground wire in J-box and pole. 6. a) Code ground wire (pole k junction box). Between 0 6 6 7 Service cabinet at SW 34th t East Valle, -goad - a) Cover for side mounted switch does not latch properly. b) Replace photo cell splice with continuous run of No. 17 AUG conductor. c) Contactor relay makes very loud buzz raise. (Contactor relay points need cleaning.) 7, a) Concrete pad corner broken. Luml na ire 2 No. 7. b) Lumi na l re headWeds I eve Iinq, e. a) Code ground conductor in pole. b) Conduit in pole junction box is too high. c) Luminaire head needs leveling, 9• a) Code ground conductor in pole and junction box. 10, a) Code ground conductc. (pole a J-box). It. a) Luminaire head needs to be leveled. b) Code ground wire pole c J-box. c) Two conduits in pole J-box are high. Should be mid-way between bottom of box and lid. 12. a) Luminaire head needs to be leveled, b) Code ground conductor (pole 6 J-box). C) One Conduit is low. 13, a) Code ground conductor pole 1. J-box. b) Luminaire head needs leveling. Between e 13 4 14 a) East Valley Road c S4 27th Street, southwest corner 'C' type junction box has two conduits that are high, b) Alsn in 'C' type junction box, northwest corner 3 conduits are higi . Looking ear for lid bent. c) Service cabinet junction box has ground rod too high. d) Service cabinet side mount switch cover latch does not work, e) Photo call conductor splice to be removed and replaced with continuous run of No, 12 AYG conductor, IL, a) Luminaire head to be leveled. 3 Lum:naire 40. 14. b) Code ground conductor in pole. c) pole junction box has 1 conduit too low. 15. a) Luminaire head to be leveled. b) Code ground conductor (pole 6 J-box) . 16. a) Level %minaire head. b) Code ground conductor (pole 6 J-box). 17. a) Code ground conductor (pole S J-box). b) Level head. is. a) Level head. b) Code ground conducto- (pole 6 J-box). C) 1 - conduit too high (pole 6 J-box) . 19. a) Code ground conductor pole b J-box- b) i - conduits are high. 20. a) Code ground conductor (pole S J-box). b) Fill around concrete pads. 21. a) Mouse loose in pole J-box with seven babies. Serve eviction notice. b) Code ground conductor (pole b J-box) . c) Drain is too high. 22. a) Code ground conductor (pole S J-box) , b) Level head of luminaires. c) Junction box lid doesn't fit. 23• a) Loose g.oand connection in pole. r 4 Lumi no l re No. 23. b) Code ground conductor (pole s J-box). c) Level luminaire head. d) Lid doesn't fit. 24. a) Level luminaire head. b) Code ground conductor (J-box only) . 25. a) Connections Inside pole are incomplete. It" 40. 314 STREET LIGHT INSPECTION Su 16TH ST, SEPTENBER I:, 1993 Luminaire No. 3. a) Connections inside pole are incomplete. b) Ground rod high. 2. a) Connections inside pole are incomplete. b) Three conduits are high inside J-box for pole. I. a) Code ground conductor (pole G J-box) . b) Loose ground conductor. Service cabinet at SW 16th St. L Lind Ave. SW - a) Circuit breakers are energized with wires not connected or taped at luminaires No. 2 and 3. b) Standby battery on clock missing. c) Paint scratches on cabinet. Lit NO. 314 SV 271N ST, EAST VALLEY1idtTll`vND AVE. W Luminaire Ib, 14. a) Code mound conductor green (pole 6 J-box). b) Grout missing at pole base and foundation. c1 Level lumina ire head. 15. a) Code ground conductor (pole only.) b) Remove concrete from J-box lid. c) Clean pole of concrete. d) No grout. e) Level Iuminalre head. 16. a) Code ground conductor (pole 6 J-box) . b) Remove concrete from J-box cover, c) Grout missing, d) Three conduits are high, e) Level Iuminalre head. 17. a) Clean concrete from pole. b) Grout missing. c) Level head. d) Remove concrete from J-box cover. 18. a) Code ground conductor (pole onlv) . b) Drain hole is high. e) Level luminaire head. Lwlnal re W 19. a) Level luminalre head. b) Remove concrete from J-box lid. cl Clean concrete from pole. d) Grout missing. e) Code ground conductor (pole s J-box). 20. a) Level Iuminaire head. b) Ground rod MO. c) Drain bolt high. d) Code ground conductor (pole 6 J-box). LID NO. 314 INSPECTION General Note: All Iuminaire heads with photo cell 1. Photo cell plug pulls out when power door is dropped. 2. But: type connector to be used in luminaire head. LID NO, 314 TRAFFIC SIGNAL INSPECTION LIND AVE. SW & SW 16TH ST. Mires on vehicle Signal heads are mismatched as to color code. Red coded conductors must go to red lamp. Yellow coded conductors must go to yellow lamp Green coded conductors must go to green lamp. White coded conductor is common around. Also, wire rumders in terminal compartment of signal pole are incomplete. The contractor should take note that it is not practical for the city to inspect further until these items are co•rected. I N T E R O F f__I C y E Id p TOt PIw k,, DATE: FROM: 1 „•S. ](�f SUBJECT: L l,'> F� L JI�f� \2 l.� 4N✓�J 1 ' i I N T E R 0 F F i Ck Y1: NG T03 ✓a non Lec, avb:.ic Works Coordinator DATF: September 9. 1983 FSOM: Ron veelson, 8ui lding a Zoning Ji -tor SUBJECTS G.I.D.Y3t<, CASCAtO SCWVR SZRVTCE, CONTRACTOR Casca;le Sewer Se:vitve vtilered citg property, rainig the fire traimw site on Lind Avenue, For storage and accaaw,a Lion of excess fill. we verbally requested Vat this be raroved at the end of the L..:.3. The contractor is responsible for restoration of tte property to the origins; condition. Invoice No_400---- CITY OF RENTON 200 MILL AVENUE SOUTH RENTON, WASH I NGTON 98055 Desinn E I 1 a Department or Division Date August II 1 B3 rCascade Septic Systems Inc. please yngkkeohecks P.O. Box 44010 payable Tacoma, NA 96444 Finance Department City of Renton LAttn•. Mr. Mark Perry OVERTIME FOR JUNE AND JULY, 1983 or L.I .D. 314, CA0 03442 6/6/93 - I hour; 6/11/83 - 4 hours; 6/11/13 • 2 hours; 6/14/83 - 4 hours 11 hours in June f $25.00 5:75.00 7/19/83 - 2 hours; 7/20 - 1 hour; 7/20/83 - I hour; 7/25/83 - I hour 4 hours In July f 525.00 $100.00 $375•00 FINANCE DEPT, PLEASE NOTIFY DON OR JEAN WHEN THIS BILL IS ►AID. EPScylDt %ILI \ w Total Dn0 cnc-OD ---- Invoice No 38U? CITY OF RENTON 200 MILL. AVENPE SOUTH— RENTON, WASH I NGTON BB055 Ehxl Nr,�I LNG nlunaias Department or Division Date__.h21r'bxr 13. 1981 r cas-0e Septic Systems• Inc. Please p�'}+�tke checks P.C. Boa 44010 payable t0 Tac-xe. WA 48444 Finance Department L AtD" Mr. Mark Parry City of Renton i Vfltrt't. IN61'ctl ION 8/5/83', • I hr,; 8!v 3 - 3 trs; F/1^/ft 3 hrs.; 8/11!.,,- ; 8/12/d3 - 4 irs; 8/IS/83 3 hrs. ;A/ISr 3 2 hrn.; 8fi7/5J - I hr.; 8/IPJE3 - f t,r.; 8115/33 I sr.; 8i::!i} - t hr.; 8/23/:3 - 7 rrs.; T • .E 11 h -r. r•. SJi.aO �. , �.., , S%,',. : FINAhitr, tAOA,41" l71 Please notify jv,, r.h.n tt+ii ',ill I. yal.I. Total Due —_._ .. OF RF4. o PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT CyMPT .g DESIGN/UTILITY ENGINEERING 235 7631 FI B MUNICIPAL BUILDING PW MALL AVE SO RENTON,WASH.9W55 L -�I4b y,'EO SEPY6" H:RdARA Y. SKNPQ11 MAYOR September lI, 198) CAS: ade Sept LG SPFVt�" flit\ P.O. Bux 44011 TncaaV+, WA 9g144 Re: CAC 034-82. WeAkly Statewert of Wotktng Osye Uear Wark± Rn;-laaed in the Wuet:ly Statement of Wurklltg Days for the w-ok -114ng Septeml er 9. 1981. Vf ry truly vourv. DogIA14 G. lkxtaghan. P.S. Dentgb.Rngtneer DCHtJfIt gnelgrlurr tit 106 EME RGENCr PDWIR uEME RA TOR t tinuetl) iA�L (Continued) ✓e, Electric Brakes ,^. Clovis Mitch License Plate Molder vf� Light System for Legal Operation on State Highways Two Steel, lockable with Hasp and Best Locks (to City Pattern) Locker &xes with Lids; 24" high x 24" wide x .16" long, a x, Four Ewrgency Lights, 12VDC on two retractable 8' long boom or poles to Illuminate trailer/generator and work areas. - Lkf Trsller, generators and housing shall be painted with approved , City of Renton colors and painting system. The City of Renton logo (as on the specification cover) 18" in diameter shall be ainted On the generator housing. V1__PThe trailer shall be fully equipped for street operation on State Highways. 8.✓Electrical Cable reel or drum roller shall be provided mounted on the trailer. �. /The manufacturer shall provide tha services of a factory-trained repre- sentotive to perform the initial startup of the generator and to instruct the owner's operating personnel in the operation and maintenance of the equipment provided by them. E,"• The Contractor shall furnish to the owner sin (6) copies of complete catalogue data for every manufactured item of materials and all com- ponents. (, a. These submittals shall be compited by the Contractors and approved by the Owner before any other material is ordered. %,6. After written approval, these submittals Shall become a part of the contract and may not be deviated from except upon written approval of the Owner. 110-1.3 - PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS (Page 4-76) Item I shall be changed to read as follows: "Manval on Uniform Traffic Control Devices for Streets and highways, 1978. (Reference to 1971 Edition deleted) The attached detail sheet titled "'ypical lighting Underground System" is hereby added to the Specifications Witt, reference to Standard Drawings and should govern over Standard Drawing J-Id where difference may occur. 110.6.1 - GENERAL (P39e 4-81) Paragraph 3 shall read as follows: "Luminaires to be ordered for this project are ISO Watt and 400 Watt Sodium Vapor with a 240 Volt regulator ballast capable of a Voltage tolerance of . 10% minimum. The luminalre shall Include the power door fa+ture." (Reference to 250 Watt lunlnaire has been deleted and the last sentence Ms been added) . 11�6 E y - 'AMPS (Page 4-82) This paragraph %hall read as follows: "Lamps to be furnished under this contract shall be 150 Watt and 400 Watt Sodium Vapor with a 16,000 and 47,500 lumen minimum ring respectively," (Reference to 250 Watt Luminaire deleted). This, I044 ._MEASUREMENT AND PAYMENT (Page 4-82) tiaragraph shall read as follows: (2) "LID Luminaires, 400 Watt, furnished tailed, per each". (Reference to 250 Watt luminalre deleted). SECTION SAI_TARY SEWER LIFT A DN (Continued) 105 TELEMETRY EQUIPMENT (Continued) Running time meter for each pump motor monitored shall be installed In a panel in the rack. The meter shall have a reset to 0 capability. Each mr ter will have engraved label to Identify motor that is monitored. The vendor shall also include an alternate for a digital solid state display running time monitor. The rack shall have an audio alarc capable of at least 85 DO audio output. This alarm may be tone pulsed or continuous tone. The alarm panel shall have a switch to disable the audio alarm. The audio alarm shall reset automatically with the correc- tlon of the fault. In addition to the audio alarm panel there s`'all be a light display to Indicate the fault circuit energized. There shall be a light display for each motor to indicate when motor is operating These lights shall have on various engraved name plates identifying location and function represented by these lights. Receiver Specifications (Cont.) Vendor will have to submit full and complete technical drawings of equipment for ser- vicing units. The vendor also must certify that equipment bid will be available for three years from the purchase date for the future expansion of the Utilities Monitoring System. Equ�i ment List (Su ested gt� Model No. Description t QC-3 or DC-3 Outdoor Cabinet 1 QX-3 or OX-3 Mounting Frame t - QP-3 or DP-3 Power Supply 2 QT-3Q-3 or OT-30-3 Tone Transmitter Payment Lump sum for Lift Station complete in place shall be full compensation for all necessary labor, material, equipment, including trenching, installing underground telephone to Pump Station and all other costs for work as specified and necessary to complete the Lift Station. DELAY IN DELIVERY Additional compensation will not be granted because of a delay in the delivery of the pump station. The contract time would be extended in accordance with the specifications if such delay occurs. SECTION 106 EMERGENCY POWER GENERATOR 106-1 - GENERAL The trailer-mounted generator set shall have in addition' K. IIOVAC Block Heater 4. 12VDC Battery Charged Automatic float Type ',,3. 12VOC Battery Cables -4. fuel Level Indicator -'S. Watt Meter .S. AC Ammeter _). Trailer Includes ,"a, fenders &A. Safety Chains - ' SECTION 106 EMER POWER GENERATOR 106-1 GENERAL i The Contractor shall furnish and deliver to the City of Renton Shops one trailer mounted emergency generator set. The generator shall be diesel Powered and radiator cooled, with a weather protective housing. 106-2 EQUIPMENT .t CIFICATIONS The engine 440 volt S. manufacturedobygeneratrsOnanhmeet et Sallbin 3 ttheMfollowingA, ec cycles, 3 phase, 9 g specifications: Generator Set Model 30.0 DOA-15R Cooling System Fuel System Radiator w/Fan Diesel Weather Protective Mousing Mounted Fuel Tank Fi F) A.C. Instrument Panel with: Kl Voltmeter Ammeter Frequency Meter Running Time Meter voltage Adjust'ng Rheostat Mounted Line Breaker K434 i Muunted Critical Muffler A434 1 Starting Batteries Crouse hinds Receptacle (female) APQ1048 ✓ The Engine Generator Set shall be furnished with po w and 2 sets of eel of cable to 1 effect connection between the generator and the wer ra w irinq diagrams and 2 copies of an operation and maintenance manual. 106-3 MEASUREMENT RIND PAYMENT The lump sum contract amount for "Emergency Pow • Generator" shall be full compensation for furnishing and tlelivering the c,.gine generator set as specified, or equal. 4-74 REPORTHUMKM(M'' PREWUS RP'T,10 PACIFIC ww+wRtPlnYe/RIu.aTgloSw�r:T Mt.wP[Ia tulrri4[T0pNN TBSTEa�/OtL1.1REa A S OMAT®1� 1aYrM1VEMEETPWX1103TO )> Y 1AUn �eMp_ooPN e fmims SAME HGIOrrn qN . n COMPRESSION TEST MOM?* s"Ev"""TW. _—aTTJJJA1At- - #boo { a vxwEo Hit, _JLE7 -S. _—�/_ eePaiacR l �"✓ � y.�7�a62, [aLUF./ �(ge03 S[�_ _— ��T C& PIIORGT 2Gi..D_ 31[{' - [�MIW d1-E.1 {.�!/.On /!f{ _ EWINEEM _—_ ._...��._..._.._.__. .[�.�. �,t PURGN OGtt10N FN"a UAA - _-..._MMIER CONrM..•d� __ YMYt �� Si2E AWMOKl2U*AT&cAWVDAICB ER1 FLI NaEe 21 28 rrEWNT CSaAOO I"has ov iRovoRra S�jIW ps rtt ve ❑lA oWWr ❑ur ----- ❑Pw s[I#❑w _ ... ------ -- --- fNd c.nnea pyP T ups 'T'PE OE CEMENT __. _ __- 9leNF �n ,:, +.OUMNTm MI wrTN 1001 'MNSVERMEo 0OURUxAn1Na/gTEE. _.�� --a ...ankh _..tflaretatbfr.t---lxc--P.blLpo_. -E�tlia+r�a( .L _i.ttt�F.a.li.. F!a!t T In Snsk L.A I._�S_ I_� .._ M�li�s&--Sf l�fA. afi Hie _ .6a[E i�LLtEEd Cls��phs— Es 1faKen �r.� _Jln�l / y 5146 [ the fvy Nf} _ qd_,-,IYIr M!� ![[peII AJ��L.{�p L�(Wltf[h• neearEEeaMn erlrue u uv a.wvcv d xt m,ub dxwr•e Fan N[tAW eNrgbnq N►'!mleMMN.mp!lenNEeeeE dM M N OW W[e0+t G!M[ElTv cries MWWnAlEb•Wtw• n.otclnn.Nlro.Yat¢�prwddNr !!tlewRMrldeerp�vv,[U+ATtlHEepeRNeaniparlw[e' CerTlfled Report by Pacft Testing Labonrorks/!pl G�__�Q ____ o•Te __._. b (J NouRe - --OTNeREEPlId[e. coii—co" 7 OM on RT IUNp IM_ICKMr Teal Yvwm W'. -- TOTKNpJM TOT s PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT y DESIGN/UTILITY ENGINEERING • 235 2631 MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE SO RENTON.WASH.SBObb a rfo SE►tt`�P BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR August 22. 1983 Cascade Septic Service, Inc. P.O. Ban 44010 Tacoma, WA 98444 Re: CMG 034.82, East Valley Road L.I.D. 314 - Weekly Statement of Working Days Dear Mark: Enclosed Is the Weekly Stateo-cnt of Working Days for the week ending August 19, 1983 for your records. Very truly Yours, Donald G. Monaghan, P.E. Design Engineer DGH: ift Enclosure A 1 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT } DE SIGNiUTIU Tv ENGINEERING • 235 2631 (J f MUNICIPAL I UILOING MO MILL AVE SO� RENTON,WASH.9111055 crab SA"t BARBARA y. SMINPOCH MA•OR August 16, 1983 Cascade Septic Service Inc. P.O. Box 44010 Tacoma, WA 98444 Attentlon; Mr, Mark Perry S,bject: Citizen Complaint re flagperson CAG 034-83, L.1.0. 314 Dear Mark: On the afternoon of August 8, 1983 1 received a call from a citizen who had been driving through the job site. After driving past the lagperson, the flag person smacked the back of their vehicle wl.h the stop paddle. This citizen had witnessed a similar '.cldent Prior to being a victis of one of your flagperson's outbursts. From conversations with you, the flagperson in question Is Eileen Villanvue. 1 assume you would agree that behavior of this nature is highly undesirable and unacceptable. If any further incidents of this nature are reported while Ms Villanvue is performing in a flag- person capacity, 1 will insist that she be replactd immediately and no longer function In that capacity. Very truly yours, Donald G. Monaghan, P.E. Design Engineer DGMijft INV h'F }�} RPUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT OESIGN/UTILITY ENGINEERING • 235 2631 !� MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE BQ BUNTON.WAEM 26M P to BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR August 12, 1983 Mr. Mark Perry Cascade Septic Service Inc. P. 0. Box 44010 Tacoma, WA 98444 Re: Weekly Statement of Working Days CAG 034-82, L.I.D. 314 Dear Nark: Enclosed please find the Weekly Statement of Working Days for the week ending August 12, 1983 for your records. Very truly yours, Donald G. Monaghan, P.E. Design Engineer jft Enclosure Invoice No_0 CITY OF RENTON 20o MILt, AVENUE SOUTH RENTON, WASH INGTON 98055 ___Dasion Fnuineerina _ Department or Division Date.Au ust 11 1 LL rCascade Septic Systems Inc. Please tr�ike checks P.O. Box 44010 pays a to Tacoma, VA 98444 Finance Department LAttn: Mr. Mark Perry City of Renton O',,RTIME FOR JUNE AND JULY. 1981 on L.I.O. 314, CAG 034-82 6/6/83 I hour; 6/11/8; 4 hours; 6/13/83 - 2 hours; 6/14/83 - 4 hours 11 hours In June P $25�00 $275.00 7/19103 2 hours; 7/20 - 1 hour; 7/20/83 - 1 hour; 7/25/83 r Nour 4 hours it July p Q5.00 $100.00 $375.00 FINANCE DEFT. PLEASE NOTIFY DON OR JEAN WHEN THIS BILL IS PAID. Total Due _.5.12;•DD SPEED LETTER TO: DATE: PROJECT: SUBJECT: f Ore f PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT DESQN/iTILITY ENGINEERING • 235-2631 OF MUNICIPAL BUILDING PDe MILL AVE.SO. RENTON,WASK OWSS 1 \Pet) SEe<EM'`.o BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR August 5, 1983 Cascade Septic Service, Inc. Y.O. Box 44010 Tacoma, WA 98444 Attention: Mr. Mark Perry Subject: Weekly Statements of Working Days, C.1G 034-82, L.I.D. 314 Dear Mark: Enclosed are the Weekly Statement.. �f Working Days for the ureks ending July 29. 1983 and Au-.;ust Sth, 1983 for your records. Very truly yours, Donald G. Monaghan, P.E. Design Engineer DGM:jft Enclosures ,E.:r virQr R� r 7t ?"Y F e "Y + t L3 J • CAN=M SYSUMS INC. August 03, 1983 �• 9fC r CAS'-AM SEPT'- SMIM. INC. P.O. Box 440090 Tacoma, WA. ^8' C `t Attnc !lark Perry Re: Renton LID 314 Our Job 0460-80+W Dear MAarkc Enclosed is our involoe 1: the amount of $731.26 for the removal and installation of the type "C" junction box. Also enclosed isc 1. Certified Transcript of Labor Pay Roll Z. Copy of our letter dated May 20. 196; 3. Copy of our letter dated June 14. 1963 4. Tnvoios #13590 5. Straight time hourly cost IBEW - Local #191 I have not used the actual gross wages paid for the certified payroll in the tilling as this does not reflect all the cost involved. Such major items as Local Pension ($1.95 per tour) (See local #191 sheet attached) do not ever have a column. In any event, a labor rate of ".00 per hour is even too low when you consider Service Stations are charging between $35.00 - $40.00 per hour and paying their machanlcs abuut half :f what our people earn, If the City cannot accept tts validity of this argument, have thsa pay us at the rate they feel is ,justifiea and include it in the next payment. As you are aware, payments on this prc t have bee:. far below our coats for the whole duration of the ,.reject. Ii fact, our average nonUily deficit Qf met over billing has been $48,051.53 for the last ten months. At 1 1/7% per month thli amountsto $720.76 per month or $7207.60 in excesa finaom charges. On a $250.000.00 project for us to fisac:ca 20!9 of the cost for the total duration is inevitable. •Ze,F NE �,;c i K�.unc WaSrtnp.�AM75 Te�eMorr i:gdi&^3 r1pp I � lise this is a long winded letter to accoapuq a 5731.20 iuvoid. hummer. it reflects the frpetration I tla\e eXperUteed In an attempt to gat a i*Awnsble payment faraw work sac I haze glen done We in order that We Beall ' invoice wUj is Paid without further. arguing and unoeweatp paper worto V tne City needs to deduct $20.00 to $30AV to satIvEl son bureaucratic need, an be it. But, please do what Is necesaary and please ;uy us. Very truly yours. CAMM SYS".124S. IV. A.F.. Ta _la£er Vice ?resident a:. :eneral Manager AE ,kln r TETING NOTES SUBJECT Site Meeting - LID 314 DATE July 20, 1983 ATTENDANCE: CANEM: Needs location of the street light conduits in relatio to the curb on the eastside of Lind on 27th and 19th. The programming has been done. the Power Company has indicated that they will have be poles out within the next week on 16th so that .ce car a!•.ead and pave. `9.w Thee need some cuts written on the staking on the radi . ,•n 19th h Lind �:ASCAJ-c 1 !?m is taking care of getting us the 4 daps on r.r.e ..ors. OAyf -' .e generator has been taken hack to Bert's office betz_se r'^ere were <ome parts mis: in5 from the facwry -tee tee for the ;arba-w Company is going to be put ,:r t-e end of the line so the price for the Change Order `.. Sn'':) plus t'.^e .*- Y unit price alked ah. u, she cracks developing on Ear, r of Garr Merlino y property. The it • ' as . -_ - nii ev 41-11 probably lust seal they Cascade X rlin� `ffice ' .) uet them to clean the c :,.e�k ,n ra l Ind raga i� r,-xz week t.:a.-cade F:as y sign from Maple Ln the iob shack and 1 ., be Taken to the Citv's sign shop. ,r in,. hack the valve that we took out of A-Econo r_r iy. Theta did not have any questions or problems. i ENDING OF FILE FILE TITLE Pao a - LT 3 14 �. key RWV , Corr Q's PWA ul cj� J*s