Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
LUA90-001
GENEP 1 II'ffRMAT10r1- 0/'RGEL? PM04-9. 1 1 fT111?U6E PleiPu-T 16'2 R-s rr**, 12,E 15,516, Iai io // e ia® () ���11 i©^;(''I IU 0 --1- - -- I --J-- - /`uovYPar Men? ,a• 69 ToTAL I7.1 / AL LRF-0tt 2 6 TOTAL/0.0 • T1o. I 2 16/61IpU66 11-1% h aux.8 TIFEa°P0'1'00 s'-n0 Y-n1L sc-FII'` 1--, 19.OP U1111S 1. 4 4 •Mt - f 11E 00 0( 10 _ DIX-/RE• (600 9� 1120 (EGwRrIBG i __. r-- -----� Erranaa) ' , ® ' I I I . for roc->E(eI.C6.): 1 IQ--cd.aeo w6 I . tea, IG00 1�4 IXa=3116 ---' ------1 {BR4Yir 13.3'�. =,-,o/ - 0 o___I 6%19T PO UNIT AVE I I r 1 I: — —----- ' fro'41FA(51D) 10 ® B. 1 , 0,0/Gr I— 1 EPEE. Flue ENIC�i wrt '• KM NPLL'ETOf'CrYI>) 18 T0L I (-1 : .•1. 650C'` /, j• L• murf n/`11 • 'O PTY.LAN e\ -,• , I � r_ E+UST.FACE o'N4ON__LT'El ._I I '� - !! m vrTa 1 1 I I tiTT0 . - ; \ i • 9 ^y / tl I e1 i Q,"' ' I wa a R1i I ;` 4 A 3' / CHURL I u I I I I T Fx15T 1e'N�T.ter. / P-' T I 1 PEST 9Fv I -prILL _ - - I0 VP_. NC V4TIO 7 /66.6,A'l a v. 0umw w� lD LLNIT RPF 1 I I 8 /// �i®�'��'( I II (ue.oc ('.��ems. '0 / z�"� R"2 Z L----� s I Uv I , R-3 - 1 �) 1 ue0 /`�` 4 „0.V G rE1YE1 I �� FF.R10' ® Z'FENeC.�i1 `�� ,/ 1 . n[[ /.�%C'w r--'' L_T I I----7 1 `um I �.J exr,T.w/j° I♦M Y 4, I I L---1 - �.-. sIr,TFfH.ar -I-eO - I L L_1---L I . 1 r6,LFF.FQ. "- R LINE , \' 13-1 55 i- ���sillEMMEIM ���lr� 41E,'ITN S- •` -6"e.U2C `4C(s.WNl E 0s• e •c ENO eV NEW 001.L.9W. ` �0 4 Frxw'z -wu40G iwr a� TIPEO.'0 NI..0000 oAve00 \/I„v T— — — — — — — ENsr.sT LN 0 12 _ VIGINITY MAP ....1 NOR,. _ _ I — - - 1 r-sxyr o¢ 1 I oust PE. LE4AI.060 41OT0N1 I I -1 -1 -0.T6'0FTI4 W.I.,'OE THE 9Md.,P.E. .E.VE OF .Celle I I I \\ SITE PLAN \J NW. F T V4 OHE 4N.1/4 CFTNE Nw.V4 Op ea Tg 00N F. .9E.W.M.IN N014TH N4 co.WPoN.LOH 9 le AO CCNh9YEO TO[AV CYNT0:4 001000E0 WOES- 0.10 ' KI E.G.A600O NO.000E1-709l1 I4.4.019-Tw.T IO2naN OF THE Nw.04 CFTNE.Nw V4 w T«.V4 0 Nw V4 OP EEG 4 u F..I T9. 0 E E.INT,.III KIN,ea TEN UNIT APE COM f'LEA- WMNE✓6XC19.AsaPOLLOW0: , O EE,IWI0 N. 4."PINT sd N.OVTNE 9,E.CORNEZ.CF0A19/J.D•g4pION1 "'I. ..I a..... T-10040 N.O.I0 We w.AVh0q THE E.UNE oo 4NN0 5uo-orw EN AL00J.i •�'MKIFF ww. TNEIIGE 9.04T'Ob..W.M.00'TO I•.0(441.ECT A UNE O6AwO MOTHE C. •• E rBT WITH AMP. 00010. 001; AT RJOHT ANGLE .9.1 TNE..LI NEC WOO.. I/,_°Fa NO 0vin0',1 0 07 TNENOe e.1041 ,NO..,1LUL LANE 14O.6T') SITE rIAN/VIGINITY PLAIN 'WENC6 E.6..66',NONE 00_IF4G TO e01Nr OP EE:GINUINA;LEY.The s 10' I 1 OP4' AA Ce Y 6 C PW N rfccr THE' 0 ETL4I eow...!c.c. W.cOEO UNe . .O 000Y190561. • ;�°..Zel _- _ .._.,tea.._. ... aNVid s.rvad NN I aNY 7NIdVJIb..`J..r1Elfl ®...— 1,.e-9I-OI•...e _ ,....._ COL-"I•...a. pL'.I .X3'1.d NQ lad_Linn N 31 N,aa 11 • Nv-»SNIdV 7+ .nun. N N O}aNNNd>:a9 al Oa.'lays. .. 1 I I •Wd I0NIMas99NO Aa]yNYnvaH 38 al-v�NI1NYld mV-B .I I I 7 • I ,30,J • NI cam,NSIN11 The al-aa 0IM a3HTOH f NOJD NGNIG 3i OL O•QgY asa 1•IV-L 11 I am.*ao Oaa•u+.90 m_asko+l•rtV-e I 1 •+" •ore-rl.,n•.I♦ I I •eN011WN3I-INGad va*+N aed a3ndlr se OL•OZWNrn G➢3M a-ma`aa]wa-aed-4 `-�_T�- - - - --I-- -�- e'Ma,-ca-C 24 Cl GaaN ONOutbN]WW0313-e•SKNN aaa ram]-lQe 1NP4 NI yT]YL JJ-Nld II.3]nl Y3di \ \Ito' - I I NM aKYdaL I..•Sd 1N-•1SW L 11 iHl dO HJd3]BILL Y94181 I}NJGIm 1NV x�Y.1p{L - B'LIML 1 1_l-MY HI a31rMe4 GL SNRans ONV Y1rIL'nY4 -- `_M_Y_ --tea ------ ---�00-- b I •a001rr11Ndad I•r•Sy.>IN1IO'1OL.S Naa]m0O.390102}a1 HMY1-L ft --r ------� y _ I •maCI XI W•Ibxal..b 9v/H aL VI.Yro-1,Vs... +.NI�Q®+�,�� it -=- -=-----g ar-r8'.ra a� ---- 1. SIT} f :1 N1L2H- ■1I - v'� I 'M S/'' aOMa•'+Nm Ire !1>O-� Imo® �l`I�\II '!n'�•'TeJ Y__1 I N'TO'. eO� I�' .i1;III MNl»3 � ara le anid10 iw3> "Id H1L 3N JM WBhWK \a \ �.a \ "� � \ , 1a / I I el tl 0,...all.'HH).H2i•tAih \ I NalVN al.yidYJ. a 1.d.a \ ` Z �. _—_ - / 1 ..Nos HON ara r! • III I _' �— • .r. � >7 � Y0o!ltla0 v0 a"...� 1 I 9'uVbl�cl%] ..:ate`.\��_ ®,■g®�� .. AMVd • _`— . y]:_.\`-\y-_ .K\T •� I""2 -kNG I YaIMOurNd �� a .Mrd-I •'. N h�'N.b ���'.f��N. 'Na.a3UMr4 /' -__ •�^• '\B \ :O'zK �r }\� •z aLu•Oa I I I v.-slat-ova �+d.S a'.'fl,rtwlwu 11A yl V•II,I4� C G x ' ��' axau9.lm I alI..ra ii-a.I►O0U4:S OTHa1NZ in'r ,pp�. w �0 N I _ .!O- aTY f gr .� ouoo L -n�oMaH1 / /.. Au 1w X'w'p�l..�OL.-rl •F a3 ueN•r r'dal.e'Q� 4''vIroan.,,`�roao n_..� Q.' ISa..si O �,..IY'` I1N aHJi� `` \ I I I A YsafylaNV+H VI'1n'mV Y N;'!ll � �J��" V VIHYall1-® 14.; 1 pa 1;1 I .1a.LL v t �Ea i a B a,Ha I — H amcNrnaelA-a I ,�db _ *Pr i<ial Nnn --___ j.aa38 1 y, �'•• + •r aaH}< 17�C IVOLL L'1-Ala JOB �f!� 'adbd-� -^.y 0 �n a+n dmU L`Y'hs+a r` 3y8a waf.vatelS'�''1 it I pr �� t,eJ tl'4s"�:1 IaNsn7 ; . II l N S IV �1I� r" Ynan•b i. II II \ \ , I I !O Wr'AwvR-a ' I - I ,p� -"� `' I I �' aaonaaannNla�Nrue-Icua® �! I'e �iAi1Ae 'O!�J�,• . \ I , \ I I = V}aMHN>Vd YA_ o/y�c=w�?t/o _4oa Qi ' ati]4a I dxL II 1 i 'i ',i % 1 •�b I '^ YNaNN.1-1. w�`J I�l� �`;;li I , ���� � ' I b ' \\ ' .L ;I 1 III I y a( `, / l,`\�IY� I �s R����'ao�iN�—�); —'-'! III .I I l'l �l 'l; S.j - - - - <ryr�, y ,! .eI _ N.r r I P b N>a,w as Z-9 ay.. 1 �\\\ ` I.l I II I I' I1e-�'x'1 `'9'] ��.� JI6oIHE NIbNJ, \ I I 1 11 fOOY il ��� Ha-s I y , .. ;:h I- V' '„ V, r`,V EQ, T'�`4 rr�e'bl.Ha11'aN, (► ,Ir, ` ' ..33 IA Alliii �CC a:`ez.ob o__hSaa i[_ + \ Il I ¢ Iay.YGlwaAN]VJ 0� :6Ns.— �—� __ 'i'IOA 1]N'YaM3` \M \ I Va WalnNINA.9la➢-�A; �` ..,.nafv,arirvab �. IXb10Jl3aNaNL NINa}e ei.- = ' ►�1b•�� 3NN_�•�M`�Oe.!1N10¢iD.4es�f'!G!I TVM]]8.a•Dd`'JarN3 _- _. —- - - - I Y}aldlaN•M�J Y1a390-IZ =--zl a(mf}30Hn lu.r190141 !n d-S I . . / • ' 1 1 IN - / ,... il• ■;c . , , . • ._..... ook_i . Oi III . .. um_ r r lai. I . . �� i� BEDROOM - BATH• Qd KITCHEN DINING RAM Ell '' / 9ININ4"RooM I'I I U. .-.L. -___ L\JIN4 Roots _ ___ . MaLl illid°111 ikk • n I I BEDROOM LIVING ROOM IIgORM l .-JL-- . II1 I 1 EACH UNIT 906 SF EACH uNIT 790SE -UNf7 PLAN-2 UNIT BUILDING ••C UNIT ELftNJ— 4 UNIT QUILDINGS 'A+Q' . IN F.= I I O.I TEN UNIT-Arr CoMRE'. .....:,ales ----.. ...-- e... lo.lb.ev ..— TYPICE'_ FLOOR PLAN COMP sIIW4LC9 (on.rccrS I� �c\r a*Tvr uv I I `� n V - .13 ` `2 D �TIWre) s I�MfL 0VC fAILPti O.. Aille t _ 1•,1 t r ytuzer rn.) lNS _ I q J - ■ �_ ��I Q n...rid .___ _-_1. 1�_� _� _�M_ - ? .V.seer Trr) 0 ❑ 0 ti i, CD $ h] III I a rwol - ® ' �� � ® Q I :U III IJNE O�n.[Y. - `FIN yt4.00 b6TDNv . NORTH WEST 50UTF} ,-:EAST TOWNHOUSE ELEVAT1ON _ I/j_I-0, CDNG smits, _ a1vING ' Pt-,. I I SIMI�I�i e •.fzMgr ELEVATIONS ihrtgkh- ®M 1 I iDsro• ELEVEN UNIT APT COMPLEX ...,.:I/6 V'-v" ........v. ........ .n.. TOWNHOUSE d cAF-Fo:T ELEV.S I4.0;4 COMP.c11IIJS.e(DY.CAFY) n.=DUP c. --ice — SIG .4u'Te�c _ 001 i[4 CSDAamM(4.'0 5Tn.) ���j� I��_�C C — — I------- — -= Ina..... DIM 1 r�LINE DF>�D4GSfeND _'-_'� I-I� "�I C_ALMIPi'1 O„O --I;,III;=„ I1=, I!� „ I ML.WE N.IDB4�D4. I 0 0 :c.§�S=M !Mi=-� _ @. -� R. i - lac CW."lM - J I, �I I Qa0 LEiXv-1WM( TYF.F¢MGL RKL. PP.ACt YRIEN WEST ELEVATION EOUTHt ELEVATION 1 �« y mmmmmwmm , III IDmED minmm 10 0 _ _ EL.IWO.-__ _ _ FIN R. G F. ® mW IIwm mmmi m ® mf 12 0=•i110 T ( • I l ) EAST ELEVATION NORM ELEVATION omt1' OmiT L OMVT OIMri' 0 0 .1 El El . r r 11-1 ( ''.. 11- ..,w 113 Ahk ._ ‘ _ I r 5OL>T likNOIZT EODT1-I ELEVATION 1,1012-TH ELEVATIO1J LA '4 I7KY RM.ELEVATO ,-. e e-cq.c,61cc..not.J a u.w.SEFAVJJ101 AFT. PJ gy,"I ELEVATIONS .11 IN ELEVEN, UNIT APT COMPZ{ 5IGN ELEVATION '' .,. --\ ...® II =I...oh A.rt rAcc.I WND127 4 II}.4 ELEVlfloJG 0 0�4 RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT i � J ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: DATE CIRCULATED: January 5, 1990 COMMENTS DUE: January 19 , 1990 EFC - 001-90 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-001-90 PROPONENT: Paul Butrim PROJECT TITLE: Custer 10-unit/PABCO Apts Site Plan Approval BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval for a 10- unit multi-family development on two contiguous parcels, the western parcel with R-2 zoning and the eastern parcel with R-3 zoning. Density levels on each site do not exceed zoning ordinance standards. LOCATION: 2514-2520 N.E. 9th Renton, WA 98055 SITE AREA . 63 acre BUILDING ,AREA (gross) : 5227 sq. ft. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth ° 2 . Air ° 3 . Water ° 4 . Plants ° 5 . Animals ° '6. Energy & Natural Resources ° 7 . Environmental Health ° 8 . Land & Shoreline Use ° 9 . Housing 7 ° ° 10. Aesthetics ° 11. Light & Glare ° 12 . Recreation ° 13 : Historic & Cultural Preservation ° 14 . Transportation ° 15. Public Services ° ° 16 . Utilities ° COMMENTS: We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Cr Signature --of Director or Authorized Representative Date Rev. 6/88 RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT' DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF- 001-90 APPLICATION NO(S) . : SA-001-90 PROPONENT: Paul Butrim PROJECT TITLE: CUSTER., 10-UNIT/PABCO APARTMENTS SITE PLAN APPROVAL BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval for a 10- unit multi-family development on two contiguous parcels, the western parcel with R-2 zoning and the eastern parcel with R-3 zoning. Density levels on each site do not exceed \zoning ordinance standards. LOCATION: 2514-2520 N.E. 9th Street Renton, WA 98055 TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: � r ENGINEERING DIVISION (TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ( BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE 2 LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHE 2S COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN ' WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. 'ON JANUARY 19, 1990. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED DATE SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 6/88 %o '_ CIZ OF RENTON "LL Planning/Building/Public Works Department Earl Clymer, Mayor Lynn Guttmann,Administrator CITY OF RENTON OCT 2 91992 October 28, 1992 RECEIVED GiTY CLERKS OFFICE Don Custer 2451 SW 172nd ST Seattle WA 98166 Re: Custer Apt. Project Site Plan Approval Expiration City file #SA-001-90,ECF Dear Mr. Custer: This letter is sent to advise you of the expiration period for the above- referenced Site Plan Approval. This approval is separate and distinct from your building permit application status. The City of Renton Site Plan Review Committee initially approved the above- referenced site plan on April 3, 1990. This approval is only valid for two years, pursuant to Section 4-31-33 of the Renton Municipal Code. The Site Plan Approval for the above-referenced project has unfortunately expired, as of April 3, 1992, without being extended. It has come to our attention that your building permit for this project has also expired. In order to reapply for your building permit, this project will be required to go through the environmental review/site plan approval process again. Please feel free to contact me at 235-2550, if you have any questions about this letter. Sincerely, Maureen Nicolay Associate Planner cc: file City Clerk Hearing Examiner 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton Washington 9R0s5 :4EMORANDUM To MARILYN PETERSON, CITY CLERK Date MAY 15, 1990 From SANDI SEEGER, CURRENT PLANNING Subject CUSTER 10-UNIT/PABCO APARTMENTS SITE PLAN APPROVAL (SA-001-90) WITH THIS MEMO I AM TRANSMITTING THE ABOVE REFERENCED FILE TO YOUR OFFICE. CITY OF RENT ON NIL '` `., COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor Planning Division May 14, 1990 , Paul Butrim 17159NE5thSt Bellevue, WA 98008 RE: ' CUSTER 10-UNIT/PABCO APARTMENTS SITE PLAN APPROVAL ECF;SA-001-90 Dear Mr. Butrim: ' The Site Plan Review Committee's Report regarding the reference application distributed on April 3, 1990, has not been appealed within the 14 day reconsideration/appeal period which expired April 27, 1990. Therefore,this matter is considered final and is being transmitted to the City Clerk this date fcr filing. Please feel free to contact Lenora Blauman, Project Manager, at 235-2550 if further assistance or information is required. ' Sincarely, Donald K. Erickson, AICP Chief, Current Planning DKE:kac cc: Gary Giesick 919 Ferndale Circle NE Renton, WA 98056 Ivan Nass ! 960 Edmonds Ave NE Renton; WA 98056 • 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2550 • - pobco PLANNING DIVISION Q P.O. BOX 6986 CITY OF RENTON BELLEVUE,WA 98008 (206) 641-1325 ppR 2 41990 April 20 , 1'990 iJ rl . Mr. Jerry and City of Renton Planning Department 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA.198055 Dear Mr. Lind: The exterior lighting we have chosen for the PABCO 10 Unit Apartment Project is indicated on the enclosed copies . If you need further information; or have more questions , please call meat 641-1325 . Since , Paul A. But'rim PAB: jb • enclosures j • • INCOME PROPERTY • CONSTRUCTION • DEVELOPMENT • (PABCO**116M6) i•f..t'-'••.,2r.4-,-4:404,`')&i,.. 7.4'r,,,,----`,.., i,,•,,,,,,,,,„t..,„,....,,,„.•,,,„•::..,,-, - t . .-.....,•. ,^^. q'f,s,yA:v.',-...-i.i-htolnit'," 4.4.,-,.,::ii.PleIV;Viii.--.•,4-',...„'".•!--.' i ' , , . 4.?,..,,,i.•,-..=t,---„,••39;0-,-..,.• 'I.%-.•.'..'•4•Ng--..-'=:A•,,e,.-N,•,=0:,•••i',.';.--:".-,•:'.-' .. ,•, •••.•••-:•.•-,..4-4,0,4 - • . 1:,,-ufs.:-.1,::,-,.e.-•4vVial , -:"•• '', ' , f,,,,ria,,,ri. --,..e.'..n.:.4./k.',,,c, ,, ' .. c:5!'" !,i'Y:,,'''ti:fp,;Vii0.;••;',.'"1.'",.-,d --'•' P1,40:"'"W "464-441.,,-,,f4f"A.,--f • ''t,'•.'-'''t' ,',''''-'71. 07•4711., -•-,•-i' .:-AT•731 -;;t:,51,-i.,0"„ - ,::_•,-, - ,,1, -••Avf-4'..1,w4y.?4.,,,,...., '- ,-': ' 4 AIIPPS1 I'V•P4,6416','"',,,,-, .1,-,P .A . ''''''P,4--,- •-•,,,At.i.4-,,,,. .,...,,-„„••5,-;•., ,,,,,,,,,...,, • ,...-,%- , ,ip? „,-,1iF,V1*.-,, ,-,,•,,k,„.• •, ;. ,94-,,,ti •. ',.',4--1,...nikp.- l'.''4' `74.14'''',V„,„3,74,••••',;,:4,4,`;:-..z.,,„,:••:',•,-•;,,••I „,,,,,,,,,3y,,,, qii: ... ,„:...itm:11.490•44,::.--"‘ : ,:k .,,,, AvgAt".,, g.-4.., - =, = 3 N.,1,,= , 43•3',‘. '',.-„c,..1',=1:,•:-.::.-•.4 •....,'=`;-.1f,,-.: ',-4r1Vikler.:,'A,'',„t .49 4 ,rt 0 0,0, ,4.4,Irk",/, ik,i1,•,,,,I,:,,,,.•ti V h .,,,,!,,,,,,;,-,%.,-. --,z,N, :.,-',WW. 1".,','.,.,",.r, ,' • .. J`Mr...,. .---...4' '''' ''''''. ' e ,,,,., , ,,,, ,,,, ,, , , ,... ,, ,,,_,,,,,r,,,,,-;;„....,„z ...,41.„..,...„......:. Th. *. ',4,-f l'''fitt4140,3,1#4,,, ,...,1*,' "., ..„.15•4,,,t: 'AO'I, l'it:se al, 1 ,...,''',,,,q,,,1.0 4 ,•,' tk,t•' 1,:,,'V i:' 't- AVallatle madiumArnt,form ,00-40,017,,,Ii2.,-,-, ' * ,.,-z„.„1„,-•,gt,„„.,.....„ i s,„;• , ,=, , f„,,,,,, .,•‘,6., ••••...„.., --, mide-d and fittinfigkpOigkiVet ,,•v,'"''•,' , • ,4.01:e0q- 4••••,„,,,r, ,,, ,4•11.,''„.*•44,.', :•A"...4'03e ";,]...!*,,U sphhg-reinforood conIncis *`-'13.4', ,4:clkikl -. 0,4,104"1,-,..i,,,At -7 '''r 'It,-1'' tor long life. c I r:•an,Magi apjethur,nire4W e,''g,':::','' • . •ti,r•et•,14:••• ''''4 • 4":‘---- '",.,•,'',. =,••,•,,-,x4q4'.4 " c.4 4''''X r , ••-,Ettr.f,1",,,,,y,,,,,A,-7 , lit", ' • „Aka:A ic''',0P-,m-- Or* 'rho ci ,.1,;roostrig ft,atrtalicf0511 • •044i;v.,•sii,•:••,1..: ,1'',•. ,4'.1,44 ,.',.1.'' ' ,:, •`-'-'' - ' * ;0::;`,... --te00101-VP)OVrel ensuring wcp3thektig 40,40.1141,4\10 ,;::'i'.: : , ' ,'Pei•44,,,w• „,„ . airi -4. .44 . raficaot aySterne: Ono-piece GOriatitoft*inr- 0k4:41 trall ,...'" . -,..... .. • A • ' ,,.4, ,•„.,-,,,1 • . - 4--fy, - • ,' r,._-,ge_, Asywitnottiosi(A)tor a ""worry of mofOri#00*$1,1*.,4*, i,,,,4.4,10,,,440,Vet„44.3"' l,,,,.....:,,, ' '..-,aiitii .,tixik 4-p. 0 v..i.-,0 r ,..'.. . shod diotrIbution 1.-•orly soalod toitt*On•aftSoleg,-.1ylo.;,s04 #4,0,:c - 'tro-A,24 -----.44 '•,, f---,,., pattorn,Type lti(3)With - , • .• - • ''re 4..'' ,,,,4q W.',g„Ow• `r,„.•fr*,,f,-4',4,,SA,,,,-;#4 - ,• ..„, • -r,-. - • ,,• •",••,,',•,.:'•''P•,•,•'•,,:-,,,:{5..40.k.34:o-)•-, •-04,' ',,,••0 "t‘4,14„s. 4 44* , pattern for inoreasod• V:4-474 10h4nect 104441ntl,r,e,itti•e"•::' ' ;14,;&;,' .-1 !:9$144;14-..•:• 6• 4,'‘'..***•65"1°4k.:44'''''''''t'' polo owing,end Forward Throw(FT)tot parka:1Mo?fighting Fahrenheit Opafa4tan.7046-0*itt' .4-,„" .7;),;47,„,,,,'- ,0,1,,,,,„4,,,••-ii,•,,„,114,,,,,.. \ rrounte0 to hoterAngtelateWng Oats'P.,i•'',!II.0 , ,totol„reimi wilco.tiono to Wahine:la Wray Pohl Ond ',4,..• 4,-,, •-•4,,.•' produce o*harp ber.logdo WWII which oriowearamt.tmnkkattlo , ' .44'; ,z ..?,. .."i'VAP% oinking tor kV/rif,a, ' : - F - ? ..,1,,-.,' e" v - h '4.`•oe' 40, I Tho 11.eld-rotatetto rotiOatOt,+Mega only . , • ,t.•• 4•,,,,,„ on filo!ergs MOO WW1 Form.rd • tv(PT) ‘ conlinuotto onetOce Ms rt gesikei ...Al.:, -,44A„ ,,,... ,,,,,, Citation,enotlioa illexiMy iti dfetillko..ftr* . , 'It, paffetne wit,,hotri inevIng Ma finite&CV4o „,•,-0.1„Z , 'r b&s•.k Pegtx) . Standard'WOW=eveRtkote tier '-,i4,00, ,4'i $ the--01tOttein abObtorteth*4-Inl • 'nf, ••P ' '‘ „•., , •„. , piotinutn;00=3 Czenefr i.V.,M4', ;'`•:-''9'!'-•''' 'It• ",..,, The Citation le 0:toolgned to telibo any of •.t., 4, ;,. ' it following!env typoOr!-itiih Pm-zattra • limo On COCO&tmrt„rhritpfidtqktl, ' r.-!.. ::,'4•-•)•' '•14' ' 4., ''", onloheo.tirm(14Are'kv4,., .• •.' ,, t,•?*,',t,',4 wi 4. Soatunt,Super Motel 1441.140 or 1144t4 ,.,,;,,,,_ 'J.,: Hado. Coring factory for:germs ffescArry revehttionsty etwert4,10 - , ',It.. -.4 a,„,, polyesier,omt tWOMNP. liakligi l'i,t,k.4'4 -i?). , -4,, Vapor orator mmuoats. ' , Cleat fiat tempered glaao tienio,to ea,01,10 owootivo oppotoram1144001-001 ,,•*---It.. tpui - i,,,o.,, - tono Wm*viith etitcebV&Dann- poll/oat-4i Plotactlost MI t4tp 0,40,4v '1'41-444I Withatar4#Stf*DO Viglig*thattta '11:1'44`,,,4'.' I:100r filotanare on the Kitakfil gn4 tii..40 without WeeftIng et 11411rte;Fritgi le 'al- 'i*-7;,i CitallOrt hAVO torta,r0kIntet Witt N*4,44 otiorMigAl toy fiv41040v8, „b4,4-,v,..,., * ,.4* A li 0- The ttirafti Oho non hflo two 4t1Attvo eitl..)4' _,,,,,..„, • Qt.h.)110,00 for WOI liotittiont. r7:- -•,_ f .. •. 4 . ., ..,. ,,,—• , . ' 1 /I 04 ..._ ._-- , 16 __.._ 16 _ litit I j ... . ) .. ,tg • _ _...„ ..- ,, ,,... ,.,. s . a a POLYCARBONATE POST•TOP WITH 3" FITT=R ,; ' 4 v" y 14 CATALOG NUMBER CATALOG NUMBER pas MA) WATTAGE i - S12E ......._. -___.- --- - -- - POSt ^}ge, ,P G � , ., OPAL CRYSTAL CLEAR -• SMOKE INC. 0.1Y NPS FITTERFINISH _--- , ' �" 'r## - 1o"x14" 2900 2900•C 2914 4914 3" rnd: 200 100 100 Black y f a4 15"x21" 2904 2904-C 2918 4918 3" rnd. 300 250 150 Black x a cP 8 4 10"x14"}�2901 2901•C 2915 4915 3" rnd. 200_ 100 100 Br.Alum, " ;` p�`r, 15"x21" 2905 2905•C f 2919 4919 3" rnd._` 300 250 150 tar. Alum.l ��' c� e , WALL. BRACKET ASSEMBLY WITH 3" ROUND ALUMINUM STEM v, y4' #Pqk .. /. k ���a e^"'t" i CATALOG NUMBER CAIALOG NUTAB@R FITS MA/WATTAGE FITTER SITE - POST �-`-1 FiNISN 1 te,r �• 1rz4 '' OPAL CRYSTAL CLF.AH^ SMOM,E INC. P4V HPs T 3 le Y t } 10_"x14" 2942 2942•C 2950 - 4950 _ 3" rnd. 200 100 100 Black Viipic wit. .� " • � _15"x21""_^2946 2946 C 2954 4_954_ 3_rnd._ 300 250 96o Black „' � ` 10"x14" 2943 2943•C 2951 4951 3" rnd. 200 t 100 100 Br. Alum. ` srt `15"x21"F 2947 2947-C .2955 4955 �3"rnd. 300 i 250 150 Br. Alum lax ix# 5 .A$9 HOp12oNMAL root CANDLES for POLYCAFBONATE SPHERE-LITES' x 4 4:;� 1 ,r r. q;l.^�y r•l••.,:': r,:n,C:1't diu l:Rn a: ,Un(;t...el TOYI fit t0 V' 1- Cx pr-•' %''. ,. _ ^I_ -MIoCuAY VAPOR,•�- _ - H4bH Da. SUS 607U1 ' r!y< c .ysT" "�s ..,. 1 " { ray liatane-i N)S --�t$tt&nao , L.I t,... ��k „„ ,",4..", - i 0.. lip. W.V ` 5 l0 120 30 'N.t1, 3' 10• 20• 30 { 6� 5 * !'. 12- , Opal too f 0 .5 1---19--0�-- -r.. T_-•-_".____ SPECIFY 10 x 14 or 15 x 21 GLOBE x - ""4444"�7��''' f t 4' Opal 100 13 .7 10 .07 130 2.0 La .42 15 `� e, 6" °�r ` Reflectors a tone-piece spun ste 'i, I 16• Opal 175 2.8 1.7 5 .17 'PA 5.3 3.2 ,84 32, , x painted `" 't11 durable rdli,,ctive 2u• Opal 175 2.9 L8 8 .2 110 3.1 2.0 7 3 "r t -,W; ,+.� ; coating oil ander`u'Ide and Cnoi(:a of 220' Opal 250 46 21 7 3 ISO 5-d 3.0 1.0 4 1 £ r,r7•,r*`yX .j`, black; white, or Custom coke on 24' Opal 250 4.7 2.5 8 3 �150 5.7 31 1.1 4 1 top; Reflector t�lstt3no to two ul 12' Cryai 100 1 .8�'7 "Ti 1 - - - - t 'I AurA,LUrne for easy rolatliping 14' Cryal 100 14 8 1 ,i 100 3,1 1.8 7 22 ` .,, , To +qN Aure 6ume with rottoc• 18' Ctrs'. 1)5 2.5 19 .0 .2 IA 47 3.6 I t Y 7%' croi. 1/5 2.6 20 7 25 169 29 2.3 0 ! 3 ,5a� f 3 OM lid letter prat{A Qt." to the ap• y0' Cry®t, 254 37 2.5 1 1 ,4 1•,0 4,4 3,4 1.3 .5 i siR :' ,, ? ,° '. propr eta model no. 21' LiykL 25b 3 3 2,6 1.1 .4 150 4.4 2,0 14 { NOTE,Optional REPhA0t010 dfn Awallatile With clear and t4olyr E;lnuav Mbuntl its Nrllui,l 14 to (�' iu e a r I d= 5 (fxturc0 to rode 916/1 ITrI 1T11prow0 light elatrioufiorl,(Sae Prom l over) CCrrrd1l13n Fpaiot 61b .rifi4 .g2E 1.46 2A 1.5D 2,04-2 18 4 t.4 l hi 41/ 7 ,h V `l Y' L ei el • h} d i • p19cO • SITE PLAN REVIEW COMMITTEE CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND DECISION April 3, 1990 APPLICATION NO. : ECF; SA-001-90 APPLICANT: PABCO Development Co. LOCATION: 2514-2520 N.E. Ninth Place SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Applicant seeks site plan approval for a ten unit residential complex on two contiguous vacant parcels, zoned to permit multi-family development. COMMITTEE REVIEW: The review was conducted at 9: 00 a.m. on, April 2, 1990, in the Renton Municipal Building. The Committee review was conducted after receiving written comments from all divisions of the Public Works Department, all divisions of the Community Development Department, and the Fire, Police, and Parks Departments. The following exhibits were entered into the record: Exhibit No. 1 Yellow file containing application, proof of posting and publication and other documentation pertinent to this request. Exhibit No. 2 Site plan (amended and received February 26, 1990) Exhibit No. 3 Landscape plan (amended and received February 26, 1990) . Exhibit No. 4 Building elevation plans. Exhibit No. 5 Utility and grading plan. Exhibit No. 6 Floor plans. FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND DECISION: Having reviewed the written record in the matter, the Site Plan Review Committee now makes and enters the following: Findings: 1. The applicant, PABCO, has requested site plan approval to allow construction of a ten unit multi-family development on two contiguous parcels, the western parcel with R-2 (low density multi-family) zoning, and the eastern parcel with R-3 (medium density multi-family) zoning. The proposed development will include three discrete buildings of two stories, including one and two bedroom dwelling units. The structure on the western parcel is proposed to have two townhouses; each of the structures on the eastern parcel is proposed to have four apartment units. Structures will be finished with hardboard shiplap style horizontal siding and cedar trim; hipped roofing will be constructed of composition shingles. The complex is proposed to have 18 parking stalls. Active recreation areas are provided for children; passive recreation and congregate areas are provided for adults. Site Plan Review Commit a Report and Decision April 6, 1990 Page 2 The site is currently vacant, except for one abandoned, dilapidated garage. 2 . The applicant's file containing the application, the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) documentation, the comments from various City departments, the public notices requesting citizen comment, and other pertinent documents was entered as Exhibit No. 1. 3 . Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and SEPA (RCW 43 .21.C, 1971 as amended) , a Determination of Non- Significance - Mitigated was issued for the subject proposal on March 5, 1990, with the following conditions: a. That the applicant provide revised site plans, in advance of site plan review, which reconfigure Buildings "A" and "B" (either through relocation of structure or reduction in density) to achieve better separation between structures to protect privacy and defensible space, to protect view corridors, to preserve air and light circulation, and to facilitate provision of emergency services. These mitigation measures are designed to address aesthetic impacts, land use impacts, housing impacts, and environmental health (noise, light and glare) impacts. [Note: This information was provided on 2/26/90, to the satisfaction of the Planning Division. ] b. That the applicant be required to provide a plan for insulation of residential units to an interior ambient level of 45 dBA, subject to approval by the Building Division, in advance of the issuance of a building permit. c. That the applicant provide a traffic mitigation plan (e.g. streetlighting, sidewalks, curbs, gutters) subject to approval by the Transportation Systems Division, in advance of the issuance of site preparation/building permits. d. That the applicant develop a storm water management plan, including a 25 year design storage/five year design release rate (determined by approved hydrograph method) , biofiltering swales (or baffled oil/water separators to filter water on the site, and required catch basins, subject to approval by the Public Works Department, prior to the issuance of site preparation/building permits. e. That the applicant provide watermain improvements and sanitary sewer line improvements to N.E. Ninth Place (and/or pay necessary fees) to a fair share, with specific plans subject to approval by the Public Works Department in advance of the issuance of site preparation/building permits. f. That the applicant provide the following construction mitigation measures: 1) an erosion control plan; 2) a plan for periodic watering down of the site; 3) a plan for wheel- washing of construction vehicles prior to their leaving the site; 4) an approved schedule for on-site construction activities, limiting hours of operation; 5) an approved hauling schedule and haul routes; 6) a cash street cleaning bond in the amount of $2, 000.00; and 7) a site/building identification plan (on the site and on the structures in order to facilitate emergency services and inspections) . These plans are subject to approval by the Public Works Department, Planning Division, Police Department, Building Division, and Fire Prevention Bureau in advance of issuance of site preparation/building permits. Site Plan Review Commis e , Report and Decision April 6, 1990 Page 3 In addition, the applicant is encouraged to take the following action(s) : a. Provide a voluntary contribution of $150. 00 per unit for development of regional public recreation areas. 4 . Plans for the development have been reviewed by all City departments affected by the impact of this proposal. 5. The subject proposal is generally consistent with the Comprehensive Plan Map designation which calls for multi- family development on this property. 6. The site plan as presented, provides sufficient parking to comply with the Parking and Loading Ordinance of the City of Renton. 7. The subject site was annexed into the City in 1946 by the Adoption of Ordinance No. 1246. The site was zoned R-2, Low Density Multi-Family Residential (westerly lot) , and R-3 , Medium Density Multi-Family Residential (easterly lot) on November 19, 1979 by the adoption of Ordinance No. 3372. 8. Land use surrounding the subject site is single-family residential, low density multi-family residential, and medium density multi-family residential. Sunset Boulevard runs near the northeast corner of the site at an elevation well-above the subject parcel. 9. The applicant's site plan complies with the requirements for information for site plan review. 10. SITE PLAN APPROVAL CRITERIA Section 4-31-33 lists ten criteria that the Hearing Examiner is asked to consider along with all other relevant information in making a decision on a Site Plan Approval application. These include the following: a. Conformance with the Comprehensive Plan, its elements and policies; As noted in Section #5, above, the proposed development is generally consistent with the Comprehensive Plan Map designation which calls for medium-density multi-family housing for the entire site. The density level proposed for the easterly lot directly conforms to this designation and to the underlying R-3 zoning. Low density multi-family residential development is proposed on the westerly lot, based upon the underlying low-family residential use (R-2) zoning. Similarly, the proposed multi-family residential complex is compatible with Comprehensive Plan Goals, Objectives and Policies for Residential Development (Section IV) , for Urban Design (Section III) and for Landscaping (Section II) . b. Conformance with existing land use regulations; The residential complex (as proposed and/or recommended) generally conforms to land use regulations/development standards (e.g. density, height, set backs, coverage) established in the Zoning Ordinance for R-2 (Section 4-31-7) , low-density multi- family development and for R-3 (Section 4-31-8A) , medium density multi-family development. • Site Plan Review Commie •e , Report and Decision ; April 6, 1990 Page 4 , The planned/recommended development also is generally consistent with requirements set in the Landscaping Ordinance (4-31-34) (e.g. number, size and diversity of plantings) and in the Parking and Loading Ordinance (Chapter 14) (e.g. number, size and dimension of spaces, location and dimension of driveways and maneuvering areas) . [Note: Because two separate sites are included in this development, and because some of the required improvements for the R-3 parcel are located on the R-2 parcel, provisions will need to be made to ensure that the two portions of the development are maintained as a single complex -- this could be achieved either through conversion from two lots to a single lot, or through use/access agreements (e.g. restrictive covenants, easements) which run with the property. ] c. Mitigation of impact to surrounding properties and uses; Staff identified potential impacts from the proposed project to the surrounding properties in the following areas: aesthetics, noise, light and glare, traffic circulation, and public utilities. The Environmental Review Committee issued a Determination of Non-Significance - Mitigated, for this project on March 5, 1990, with conditions developed to address the above-defined environmental impacts (See Section 3 above) , as they would affect surrounding properties. Similarly, conditions established in conjunction with this site plan review are intended to mitigate impacts from the proposed development. For example, proposed design and location of buildings, parking and service areas, recreation areas, landscaping, and screening at all site boundaries (combined rockeries/ retaining walls, new solid wood fencing, and existing solid wood fencing, six feet in height) provide an acceptable level of separation/privacy between the site and abutting developments, providing privacy and defensible space for residents and neighbors (this amenity will not fully visually separate the site from neighboring sites, owing to changes in grade and building heights, but should be designed to improve privacy for first floor residents, visually separate the site from the parking area of the property to the east, contain vehicular light and glare, and provide property definition These improvements also offer a more attractive view for residents of neighboring developments and passersby. Improvements required to the right-of-way should result in more efficient, safer circulation for project- generated vehicles (approximately 60 ADWVTE) and pedestrians, as well as local non-project related traffic. Further, upgrading of off-site utilities lines should result in better services to the neighborhood as a whole. Finally, on-site recreation facilities, together with a requested contribution to the improvement of local public recreation facilities, are planned to mitigate impacts to those neighborhood recreation areas. This proposed multi-family residential complex provides an appropriate transitional use between single-family Site Plan Review Commi" :e Report and Decision April 6, 1990 Page 5 residences to the west and south, and more densely designed multi-family developments to the north and east. Improvements to this essentially vacant site, which is overgrown with vegetation, should enhance the appearance of this section of N.E. 9th Place. It may also enhance the attractiveness of nearby commercially- zoned sites for new development or redevelopment, thereby improving the viability of the neighborhood as a whole. d. Mitigation of impacts of the proposed site plan to the site; Staff identified potential impacts from the proposed project to the subject property in the areas of aesthetics, noise, light and glare, and traffic circulation. As noted above, the Environmental Review Committee issued a Determination of Non-Significance - Mitigated, for this project on March 5, 1990. In that document, conditions have been established to address the above- defined environmental impacts to the site (See Section 3 above) . Similarly, conditions established in conjunction with this site plan review are intended to mitigate on-site impacts. Proposed plans for design and location of structures, recreation areas, landscaping (including retention of significant trees) , screening (e.g. boundaries, patios, parking areas) , access and parking plans, and entry way signage plans have been developed in a way which generally promotes an attractive, safe, functional development for residents and visitors. For example, the recreation areas and congregate area (with covered seating, lighting, and plantings) are located so that they are accessible and visible from all residential structures, but are sufficiently separated from living areas so that there will be no undue noise to those areas. The landscaping and screening are designed to provide an attractive view and to enhance separation between disparate activities (e.g. living areas, recreation areas, parking areas, dumpsters) . All dwelling units will have screened patios and adjacent exterior storage facilities. Staff will recommend minor modifications to the proposed exterior lighting plan to enhance appearance, and to improve efficiency and safety of routine operations and for emergency management. e. Conservation of area-wide property values; The proposed development is generally anticipated to have a positive impact on property values since the proposed residential complex will be located on a currently unimproved property and will provide residential development in an area where such development is appropriate. f. Safety and efficiency of vehicle and pedestrian circulation; The proposed development is anticipated to generate approximately 66 ADWVTE (ITE Report) . Proponent proposals and City recommendations for pedestrian linkage (48" wide sidewalk) and vehicle access and circulation routes, exterior lighting, and signage should facilitate safe passage to and through the site. Site Plan Review Commi :e Report and Decision April 6, 1990 Page 6 g. Provision of adequate light and air; The proponent's project design, in combination with conditions established in conjunction with environmental review, provide for separation of buildings from neighboring sites, and for open space and recreations areas which are adequate to ensure an environment which offers sufficient light and air to both residents of the proposed and of neighboring dwelling units. h. Mitigation of noise, odors, and other harmful or unhealthy conditions; Residential structures have been located at a sufficient distance from one another and have been sufficiently improved with interior insulation (by Building Code requirements and Environmental Review Committee conditions) so that interior sounds will not migrate to/from other on-site activities or neighboring developments. Similarly, requirements for screening, for site boundaries as necessary, for private patios, and for parking areas should reduce noise impacts to dwelling units. Because the site is proposed for residential use, odors and other unhealthful conditions are not anticipated. i. Availability of public services and facilities to accommodate the proposed use; and Public services and facilities are generally available to the site, with current resources and/or with improvements provided by the applicant. Emergency service resources (fire, police) are adequate to provide for anticipated service needs. Standard requirements for signage, access, sprinklering, alarms systems, and similar improvements will facilitate efficient service provision. Renton School District officials report that the anticipated three school-aged children can be accommodated at Highlands Elementary School, approximately one-quarter mile to the south of the site, McKnight Middle School, approximately one-quarter mile to the north of the site, and Hazen High School, approximately 1-1/2 miles to the east of the site. Highlands Park and North Highlands Park, two quite small neighborhood parks, are within one mile of the site. Because there is a need for additional neighborhood facilities to serve the growing residential community, the applicant has been requested by the Environmental Review Committee to make a voluntary contribution of $1500. 00 ($150 per unit) to improve existing facilities and create new ones. Gene Coulon Park, a regional facility, is approximately 1- 1/2 miles west of the development. In conjunction with the issuance of building permits, the Public Works Department will require that the proponent improve existing water mains on N.E. 9th Place to accommodate this development. Standard off- site improvements (e.g. curbs, sidewalks, gutters and streetlighting) will also be required at that time. Site Plan Review Commi :e Report and Decision April 6, 1990 Page 7 Storm water runoff management system development requirements were also established in concept in conjunction with environmental review (See Section 3) . System specifications will be established by the Public Works Department at the time of building permit. j . Prevention of neighborhood deterioration and blight. The development is seen by staff as having a positive impact on the existing residential and commercial neighborhoods, serving as a transitional use between those developments, and contributing to the local neighborhood identity by supporting existing services and businesses. Conclusions: 1. The subject proposal generally complies with the policies and codes of the City of Renton. 2 . Specific issues raised by various City departments and focused on were: a. Aesthetics b. Noise, light and glare c. Traffic circulation d. Public Services/Utilities 3 . The proposal essentially complies with the Comprehensive Plan designation of Medium Density Multi-Family Use. Decision: The site plan for PABCO apartments, file no. ECF; SA 001-90, is approved subject to the following conditions: 1. That the applicant comply with all conditions established in conjunction with the Environmental Determination of Non- Significance, Mitigated, issued on March 5, 1990. 2 . That the applicant ensure that the two separate lots included in this development are maintained as a single complex -- because some of the required improvements for the R-3 parcel are located on the R-2 parcel -- either through conversion from two lots to a single lot, or through use/access agreements (e.g. restrictive covenants, easements) which run with the property. The newly developed single property or the use/access agreement must be approved by/filed with the City of Renton and duly recorded with King County. 3 . That the applicant provide a revised exterior lighting plan with additional decorative pole lighting fixtures to fully illuminate: a) the parking area; and b) the south side of the site in the landscaped area (if that area is not sufficiently illuminated by street lighting) . 4. That the applicant provide a landscaping maintenance bond in the amount of $2, 000. 00, to be valid for a period of three (3) years, and to be deposited into the appropriate City fund, with the bond being subject to the approval of the City Attorney, in advance of the issuance of site preparation/building permits. Site Plan Review Commi :e Report and Decision April 6, 1990 Page 8 For the purpose of these decisions, the term "should" and "shall" are to be considered mandatory and the term "may" is considered discretionary. Notes to Applicant: An applicant complying with these provisions and willing to hold the City harmless for any expense or damages incurred for work begun prior to the exhaustion of the 14-day appeal period and/or for work which may consequently be stopped by an appeal or work required to be altered or returned to its preconstruction state, may begin construction activities with the issuance of the proper permits. ORDERED this 3rd day of April , 1990, on behalf the Site Plan Review Committee. r � • Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator TRANSMITTED this 3rd day of April , 1990 , to the parties of record: TRANSMITTED this 3rd day of April , 1990 , to the following: Mayor Earl Clymer Lynn Guttmann, Public Works Director Ken Nyberg, Community Development Director Larry Springer, Planning Manager Ronald Nelson, Building Director Councilman Richard M. Stredicke Members, Renton Planning Commission Glen Gordon, Fire Marshall Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Valley Daily News REQUESTS FOR RECONSIDERATION must be filed in writing on or before April 27 , 1990 . Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Site Plan Review Committee is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior meeting, may make a written request to the Zoning Administrator for review by the Site Plan Committee within fourteen (14) days of the decision. This request shall set forth the specific errors relied upon by such appellant, and the Committee may, after review of the record, take further action as it deems proper. If an appeal is made to the Hearing Examiner, requests for reconsideration will be forwarded to that office for consideration at the same time as the appeal. AN APPEAL TO THE HEARING EXAMINER is governed by Title IV, Section 3011(B) (1) , which requires that such appeals be filed directly with the Hearing Examiner. Appeals must be made in writing before 5 p.m. on April 27 , 19 accompanied by a $75. 00 fee and other specific requirements. THE APPEARANCE OF FAIRNESS DOCTRINE provides that no ex parte (private one-on-one) communications may occur concerning land use decision. The Doctrine applies not only to the initial committee decision, but to all Request for Reconsideration as well as Appeals to the Hearing Examiner. All communications after the decision date must be made in writing through the Zoning Administrator. All communications are public record and this permits all interested parties to know the contents of the Site Plan Review Commi' se Report and Decision April 6, 1990 Page 9 communication and would allow them to openly rebut the evidence in writing. Any violation of this doctrine could result in the invalidation of the request by the Court. ,an Review Committee ; and Decision - 1 6 , 1990 fe 8 • For the purpose of these decisions,, the term "should" and "shall"- are to be considered mandatory and the term "may" is considered discretionary. Notes to Applicant: • An applicant complying with these provisions and willing to hold the City harmless for any expense or damages incurred for work • begun- prior to the exhaustion of the 14-day appeal period and/or for work which May consequently be stopped by an appeal or work . required to be altered or returned to its preconstruction state, may begin construction activities with the issuance of-the proper permits. ORDERED' this .3rd day of April • ,'_1990, on behalf , the Site ' Plan Review Committee. v • Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator TRANSMITTED this 3rd day of April , 1990 , to the parties of record.: • TRANSMITTED this 3rd day of April , , 1990 , to the following: • S S • . 1 r oWu li Mayor Earl Clymer . .l' k_ sin4`Z 10 Lynn Guttmann, Public Works Director Ken Nyberg, Community Development Director dV`i � ' Larry Springer, Planning Manager s 'el4ttrl Ronald Nelson, Building Director Councilman Richard M. Stredicke I'-I %t t4'ee5 Members, Renton Planning Commission C;Q-011 G,�S Glen Gordon, Fire Marshall Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney k. Valley Daily News 1�- • • 4/2- REQUESTS FOR RECONSIDERATION must be filed in, writing on or before - April 27 , 1990 Any aggrieved person feeling that the .decision. of the Site Plan Review Committee is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in, judgment, or the -discovery of new evidence which could not. be reasonably available at the prior meeting, may make a written request to the Zoning Administrator for review by the Site Plan Committee within fourteen (14) days of the -decision. This request shall set forth the specific errors relied upon by such appellant, and the Committee may, after review of .the record, take further action as it deems proper. If an appeal is made to the. Hearing Examiner, requests for reconsideration' will be forwarded to that office for consideration at the same time as the appeal. AN APPEAL TO THE HEARING EXAMINER is governed' by Title IV, Section 301.1 (B) (1) , which requires that such appeals` be filed directly with the Hearing Examiner. Appeals must be made in . writing before 5 .p.m. on . April' 27 , . 19. . , , , accompanied by a $75 . 00 fee and other specific requirements. THE APPEARANCE OF FAIRNESS DOCTRINE provides that no ex parte (private one-on-one) communications may occur' concerning land use decision. The Doctrine applies not only to the initial committee decision, but to all Request for Reconsideration as well as Appeals to the Hearing Examiner. All comniuni'cat.ions' after the decision date must be made in writing through the Zoning Administrator. All communications are public record. and this permits all interested parties to know the contents of the f, CITY OF RENTON • boa '" s COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor Planning Division March 21, 1990 Paul Butrirn 17159 NE 5th Street Bellevue,WA 98008 RE: File #SA-ECF-001-90 Custer 10-unit/Pabco Apartments Site Plan Approval 2514 - 2520 NE 9th Place Renton, WA 98055 Dear Mr. Butrim: This letter is to inform you that the appeal period has ended for the Determination of Non-Significance for the above-referenced project. No appeals were filed. If you have questions or desire clarification of the above, please call Lenora Blaumen of the Current Planning Division, Community Development Department, at 235-2550. he Environme tal Review Committee, Donald . rickson, AICP Zoning Administrator DKE: cc: Gary Giesick 919 Ferndale Circle, N.E. Renton, WA 98056 Ivan Nass 960 Edmonds Avenue, N.E. Renton, WA 98056 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2550 • - ��,�"'""" _dam`' l F7'YJ ''SF steed4, ' ` CITY OF RENTON la 4COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor Planning Division March 5, 1990 Paul Butrim 17159 NE 5th Street Bellevue, WA 98008 Re: File #SA-ECF-001-90 Custer 10-unit/Pabco Apartments Site Plan Approval 2514 - 2520 NE 9th Place Renton, WA 98055 Dear: Mr. Butrim: This letter is to inform you that the comment period has ended for the Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated for the above-referenced project. No comments were received. The Committee's determination is final and may be appealed to the City's Hearing Examiner no later than 5:00 p.m. March 19, 1990. Any appeal must state clearly why the determination should be revised and must be accompanied by a non- refundable $75.00 filing fee. If you have questions or desire clarification of the above, please call Lenora Blauman of the Current Planning Division, Community Development Department, at 235-2550. For the Environmental Review Committee, Donald K. Erickson, AICP Chief, Current Planning DKE:mr cc: Gary Giesick 919 Ferndale Circle, N.E. Renton, WA 98056 Ivan Nass 960 Edmonds Avenue, N.E. Renton, WA 98056 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2550 • AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION 510 6 7 Lynn Rai n P y,being first duly sworn on oath states that he/she is the Chief Clerk of the VALLEY DAILY NEWS • Kent Edition • Renton Edition • Auburn Edition _ NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL Dailynewspapers six (6) times a week. That said newspapers DETERMINATION publishedEnvironmental Review Committee are legal newspapers and are now and have been for more than six Renton, Washington months prior to the date of publication referred to, printed and published The Environmental Review Committee Non- in the English language continuallyas dailynewspapers in Kent, King (ERC) has issued ta Determination the tl followingof N ro- g Significance-Mitigated for the pro- County, Washington. The Valley Daily News has been approved as a legal ject(s) under the authority of the Renton newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for Municipal Code. The following Applicant(s) have a King County. PAULcompleted BUTRIM/PABCOation process: CUSTER/PABCO APARTMENTS The notice in the exact form attached, was published in the Kent Edition ECF;SA 001-90 Renton Edition XX Auburn Edition , (and not in Request for site plan approval tors ten(10) development multi-family development on two (2) supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers contiguous parcels,the western parcel with during the below stated period. The annexed notice a 1D v h 1 i c N c t is a R-2 (low density multi-family) zoning, and the eastern parcel with R-3(medium densi- ty multi-family) zoning. Density levels on (Environmental Determination) R4026 each site are within zoning ordinance stan- dards. The proposed project would be located at 2514 - 2510 N.E. 9th Place. was published on March 5 , 1990 Further information regarding this action is available in the Community Development Department, Current Planning Division, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington, The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the 235-2550. This Determination is FINAL. Sum of$ 2 9 •93 There is a 14 day appeal period which will end at 5:00 PM on March 19, 1990. Any appeal of this decision may be made to the City's Hearing Examiner, Municipal Build- ing,�J 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton,Wash- ington. An appeal must state clearly, in writing, why the Determination should be revised and must be accompanied by a 5 t h March 90 non-refundable $75.00 filing fee. Subscribed and sworn before me this day of 19 Published in the Valley Daily News March 5, 1990. R4026 Acct. #51067 N Public for the State of Washington residing at Auburn, King County, Washington VDN 487 Revised 4/89 ifut)) NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION Environmental Review Committee Renton, Washington The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a Determination of Non- Significance-Mitigated for the following project(s) under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code. The following Applicant(s) have completed a mitigation process: PAUL BUTRIM/PABCO CUS'1'ER/PABCO APARTMENTS ECF; SA 001-90 Request for site plan approval for a ten (10) unit multi-family development on two (2) contiguous parcels, the western parcel with R-2 (low density multi-family) zoning, and the eastern parcel with R-3 (medium density multi-family) zoning. Density levels on each site are within zoning ordinance standards. The proposed project would be located at 2514 - 2510 N.E. 9th Place. Further information regarding this action is available in the Community Development Department, Current Planning Division, Municipal Building, Renton, .Washington, 235- 2550. This Determination is FINAL. There is a 14 day appeal period which will end at 5:00 PM on March 19, 1990. Any appeal of this decision may be made to the City's Hearing Examiner, Municipal Building, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, Washington. An appeal must state clearly, in writing, why the Determination should be revised and must be accompanied by a non-refundable $75.00 filing fee. Published: March 5, 1990 Account #51067 1 l ENVIRONMENTAL DECLARATION ECF;SA 001-90 APPLICATION NO. C:US1tK/YAISC.0 AYAKlNIt1Nin PROPOSED ACTION PAUL BUTRIM Request for site plan approval for a ten (10) unit multi-family development on two (2) contiguous parcels, the western parcel with R-2 (low density multi-family) zoning, and the eastern parcel with R-3 (medium density multi-family) zoning. Density levels on each site are within zoning ordinance standards. The proposed project would be located at 2514 - 2510 N.E. 9th Place. GENERAL LOCATION AND OR ADDRESS The proposed project would be located at 2514 - 2510 N.E. 9th Place. POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ,ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE [E.R.C.] HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION • ODD ES KDOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. J' AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT DWILL WILL NOT BE REQUIRED. • THE CITY OF RENTON WILL NOT ACT ON THIS PROPOSAL FOR 15 DAYS FROM THE DATE BELOW. COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY AN APPEAL OF THE ABOVE DETERMINATION MAY • BE FILED WITH, THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER BY 5:00 P M MARCH 19, 1990 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON PLANNING DIVISION AT 235-2550. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE - WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION • CERTIFICATION M�.r S (=do , HEREBY CERTIFY THAT 3 COPIES OF • THE ABOVE DOCUMENT' WERE POSTED BY ME IN • CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON OR .NEARBY THE DESCRIBED PROPERTY OK 3- 8 -9d • ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a . Notary Public, in and for the State of Washington residing in on the grA. ,SIGNED : �la.,, lave day of niati.t. J 1 9C1(� • NOTICE ENVIRONMENTAL DECLARATION ECF;SA 001-90 APPLICATION NO. (:US1tKJYA1SLU AYAKC1Nlbly 1J PROPOSED ACTION PAUL BUTRIM Request for site plan approval for a ten (10) unit multi-family development on two (2) contiguous parcels, the western parcel with R-2 (low density multi-family) zoning, and the eastern parcel with R-3 (medium density multi-family) zoning. Density levels on each site are within zoning ordinance standards. The proposed project would be located at 2514 - 2510 N.E. 9th Place. • • GENERAL LOCATION AND OR ADDRESS The proposed project would be located at 2514'- 2510 N.E. 9th Place. POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE [ E.R.C. ) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION ❑DOES KDOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT ❑WILL >WILL NOT BE REQUIRED. THE CITY OF RENTON WILL NOT ACT ON THIS PROPOSAL FOR 15 DAYS FROM THE DATE BELOW. COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY AN APPEAL OF THE ABOVE DETERMINATION MAY BE FILED WITH THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER BY 5:00 p.m., MARCH 19, 1990 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON PLANNING DIVISION AT 235-2550. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION rOLOW Xtxx pobca © P.O. BOX 6986 BELLEVUE,WA 98008 (206) 641-1325 February 26, 1990 3i:N FEB 2 .6 1990 „ ,. Mr. Donald K. Erickson, AICP .I 1tr Zoning Administrator City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 RE: File #SA-ECF-001-90 Custer 10-unit/PABCO Apartments Site Plan Approval Dear Mr. Erickson: In repsonse to your February 9, 1990 letter listing the conditions of the mitigated Determination of Non-Significance for the above referenced file, we have made the following revisions to our previously submitted plans and are submitting them for your review and approval . 1 . Revised Site Plan - Buildings A & B have been reconfigured to achieve a 15 foot landscaped separation between the two buildings and the privacy fence has been eliminated. These changes will promote better air and light circulation and improve the view corridor. Please also note that to protect privacy, the south end of Building B will not have windows facing Building A. and the new laundry entrance will be screened with plantings . - Fencing on the east property line - privacy fencing has been placed around patios on the east property line. These fences_ will be six (6) feet high and provide privacy from the parking area to the east . Openings in the fences between patios will be landscaped for privacy and will soften the visual impact of this fence and Buildings A & B as perceived by the neighbors to the east . • - All walkways within the site have been increased in width to 48 inches . - An exterior pedestrian scale lighting plan has been included on the landscape plan. - Each Unit has been provided with an additional storage area outside the unit for storage of non-household items . - Screened area for a dumpster has been centrally located for convenience and minimum impact . INCOME PROPERTY • CONSTRUCTION • DEVELOPMENT • (PABCO**116M6) r I� - Exterior siding for the project will be Weyerhauser hardboard siding (style - cottage lap) or equal . A sample is submitted with this letter for your inspection. - Six foot high fencing is provided where required for privacy and defensible space for residents and neighbors and to reduce vehicular light and glare. - A covered seating area for adults has been added to the back side of the mailbox strucutre. This location facilitates supervision of the adjacent children's play area. 2 . Buildings will be designed to achieve an interior ambient noise level of 45 dba. 3 . A traffic mitigation plan is being developed for approval by the Transportation Systems Division. 4. Touma Engineering has been hired to develop a storm water management plan. 5 . Touma Engineering has been hired to coordinate with Public Works on watermain improvement to N. E. 9th Place. 6. Construction mitigation measures suggested by the Environmental Review Committee will be implemented and put in use during construction. If, after your review of this letter and the revised drawings, you have any quesitons, please contact me at 641-1325 . Sincere "7,4);;( Paul A. Butrim enclosure cc: Lenora Blauman it 4METRO _ Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle Exchange Building • 821 Second Ave, • Seattle,WA 98104-1598 February 23, 1990 PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF RFNTON FEB 2 71990 Environmental Review Committee N c/o Don Erickson, Zoning Administrator City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 Determination of Significance File No. : ECF-001-90 Custer/PABCO Apartments Dear Environmental Review Committee: Metro staff has reviewed this proposal and anticipates no significant impacts to water quality or to Metro' s wastewater facilities or public transportation services. Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment. Sincerely, Gregory M. Bush, Manager Environmental Planning Division GMB:p1g3465 WelWashington State Duane Berentson Department of Transportation Secretary of Transportation District 1 15325 S.E. 30th Place Bellevue,Washington 98007-6538 (206)562-4000 Februar 1 ' PI.�P��tG�d dOM CITY OF RE TON TO: Don Erickson FEB 2 01990 Zoning Administrator Planning Division Community Development Department 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Wa. 98055 SR 900 M.P. 12 . 68 C. S. 1713 Determination of Non Significance (Mitigated) Custer/PABCO Apartments - 10 Units File � No. ECF; SA-001-90 41g 4 FROM: JAMES L. LUTZ, P.E. , Utilities/Developer Services Engineer Washington State Department of Transportation District 1 15325 SE 30th Place, MS 113 Bellevue, WA 98007-6597 Thank you for giving us the opportunity to review this document. The proposal is to build a 10 unit apartment complex at 2514 - 2520 N.E. 9th Place. Our response is checked below. XX We have reviewed the subject documents and have no comments. The project will have no adverse impacts to the state highway system. We have already submitted comments on this project. Our comments are included in our letter dated from to . We have no further comments on this project. We have reviewed the subject document and request the applicant provide further information. We have concerns about the following: Please contact Dick Aust of my Developer Services Section at PHONE: 562-4269, SCAN 638-4269 , if you have any questions. DA:da cc: WSDOT State Aid - MS 121 . • :.;:: :C .. .1 ,:•::>:ENTO:::;,< 2•.:+ : `��s uPRE.:;..:: ;;.:..:, :..:.;:..:.,X;.:;'.; ;<.<.:'Vrg•:iO/ :::::::::::::::: »:::;:�::::<:::<:: < :> :::::::>'::: F.I • .::...::::::::::::::.:<:.:::':::>:::<::>::::>::::•;:.;:::;::>:.>:<:•:•::.:.:.....:::::.::.::...................... ....... ....t`SA :LAN'G::: ;•i>:. :i:::»......:::::•::•>: i ::<i ::. On the L9-3G day of V>Nk•,,h `` , 19 `io , .I • deposited in the mails 'of the united States a sealed. envelope containing ckeA k,sts .,\ cACL-� C w,n\\rNc h0-U,% . . • documents. This information was sent to: Name Representing I 1 `T. . �� ‘c ti • 0c.-.._.. 1 lG\o,_I`1 1t _ c_. '61-;')Ir)-t-Vic Ct rn (Lfz_ 11� �4 Vl��'��' Ct� tl C i,1 • • (Signature of Sender) C--_•-• \,--.,..-�Yc-t .- -K-•n Subscribed and sworn to me this c4, day of 6 19I'D . ' 1,Q::_e_12,0---2_,_-_-_-, P 4.-e f•-,-.0 _rz_ Notary Public in and for the State of Washington residing at ` I� 6= n A i therein. : ro4•ec.ti:.:Name....::::.:•;:<.;>_....::::.; :::..;:.::::::::;.;;:.>:.::;�...k....... .t.:.:.;:.r:_:. :::.:.:.::;.:.:.;:.>:.:::..::..::..::.:.;:.:.;:.:<.;::.;:<::::::::. .;:>:.: :; Viz.; ':::;»:: } : f 1•{ . ?•.:•i::•:•}y.•.ii::•:•::•'i.ii'•:'•: :•}Y••i;.:•.:•.•.:.::.�: :�.:,: :::i•i: i::i:}$j$: ;��ii:':v: :i.:v.v. : :. : :.�. .:.. '�::'1.':i�:��Fi�S}f:l. /....... ...... .:: :....:R:•: :� s: i::.ii::.;::.::::•}:.i:•i::::: ;::gi ••:••is.ii:::::i?iii:.i:.:i.ii.iii•. ::::::iiii: inii.;•::••.i.•::i� :ro:.;e e.t:.:: .0 ;;.i.i�:::<.:i:.i:.»:;•>:.i.;.i..:.::�:: :.::.:;.i:.:�>:.;>::.: 1 • �; :_ x CITY OF RENTON `A i; 't COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer,,Mayor Planning Division February 9, 1990 Paul Butrim 17159 NE 5th St. Bellevue, WA 98008 Re: File #SA-ECF-001-90 Custer 10-unit/Pabco Apartments Site Plan Approval Dear Mr. Butrim: • This letter is written on behalf of the Environmental Review Committee and is. to inform you that they have completed their review of the environmental impacts of the above referenced project. The Committee on February 7, 1990, decided that your project may be issued a Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated with the following conditions: 1) That the applicant provide revised site plans, in advance of site plan review, which reconfigure Buildings "A" and "B" (either through relocation of structure or reduction in density) to achieve better separation between structures to protect privacy and defensible space, to protect view corridors, to preserve air and light circulation; and to facilitate provision of emergency services. These mitigation measures are designed to address aesthetic impacts, land use impacts, housing impacts, and environmental health (noise, light and glare) impacts. [Note: At the time of site plan review it is likely that staff will recommend that the applicant provide plans which include, but may not be limited to the following improvements: 1) modification of'the architectural design of Buildings "A", "B" and "C" so that scale and size are compatible with property dimensions and configuration, mitigate aesthetic impacts, and creates a livable environment; 2) increase setbacks of Buildings "A" and "B" from the east property line to improve privacy and defensible space between.the site and neighboring property to the east; (3) provision of improved amenities (including, but not necessarily limited to, more spacious patios, private entryways, thematically integrated carports -- if carports are included, pedestrian linkage with 48 inch minimum walkways, exterior pedestrian- scaled lighting plans, exterior storage areas adjacent to units, screened dumpsters; if feasible, private laundries would be desirable); 4) utilization of exterior materials which are thematically integrated on all building facades, and which are attractive and durable; 5).provision of acoustically designed solid wood screening or brick/masonry walls, six feet in height, at all site boundaries in order to improve privacy and'defensible space for residents and neighbors (this amenity will not fully visually separate the site from neighboring sites, owing to changes in grade and building heights, but should be designed to improve privacy for first floor residents, visually separate the site from the parking area of the property to the east, contain vehicular light and glare, and provide property definition); and 6) provision of a passive, congregate area for adults on the site --with covered seating, lighting, and plantings. . These recommendations are established to address, in part, Site Plan Review criteria (e.g. on-site impacts, impacts to surrounding developments).] 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2550 Paul Butrim February 9, 1990 Page 2 2) That the applicant be required to provide a plan for insulation of residential units to an interior ambient level of 45 dBA, subject to approval by the Building Division, in advance of the issuance of a building permit. - 3) That the applicant provide a traffic mitigation plan (e.g. streetlighting, sidewalks, curbs, gutters) subject to approval by the Transportation Systems Division, in advance of the issuance of site preparation/building permits. 4) That the applicant develop a storm water management plan, including a 25 year design storage/five year design release rate (determined by approved hydrograph method), biofiltering swales (or baffled oil/water separators to filter water on the site, and required catch basins; subject to approval by the Public Works Department, prior,to the issuance of site preparation/building permits. 5) That the applicant provide watermain improvements and sanitary sewer line improvements to N.E. 9th Place (and/or pay necessary fees) to a fair share, with specific plans subject to approval by the Public Works Department in advance of the issuance of site preparation/building permits. 6) That the applicant provide the following construction mitigation measures: a) an erosion control plan; ) a plan for periodic watering down of the site; c) a plan for wheel-washing of construction vehicles prior to their leaving the site; d) an approved schedule for on-site construction activities, limiting hours of operation; e) an approved hauling schedule and haul routes; f) a cash street cleaning bond in the amount of$2,000.00; and g) a site/building identification plan (on the site and on the structures in order to facilitate emergency services and inspections). These plans are subject to approval by the Public Works Department, Planning Division, Police Department, Building Division, and Fire Prevention Bureau in advance of issuance of site preparation/building permits. In addition the applicant is encouraged to take the following action(s): 1) Provide a voluntary contribution of$150.00 per unit for development of regional public recreation areas. (Note #1: Because two separate sites are included in this development, and because some of the required improvements for the R-3 parcel are located on the R-2 parcel, provisions will need to be made to ensure that the two portions of the development are maintained as a single unit -- this could be achieved either through conversion from two lots to a single lot, or through use/access agreements [e.g. restrictive covenants, easements] which run with the property. Specific measures will be recommended in conjunction with site plan review). (Note #2: The City code allows administrative site plan review for this project, based upon its small size. However, there has been neighborhood interest in this project, as a result of site design, traffic impacts, etc. Under these circumstances, staff recommend public hearing by the Hearing Examiner for site plan review.) Because the Environmental Review Committee imposed specific mitigation measures rather than issue a Determination of Significance, there is a required fifteen (15) day comment period during which comments are solicited from various agencies, jurisdictions or individuals (including the applicant) who may have an Paul Butrim February 9, 1990 Page 3 interest in the Committee's decision. The comment period will end February 26, 1990. Following the end of the comment period, the City will finalize its Determination unless comments received require a reevaluation. Following the finalization of the Determination, there is a required fourteen (14) day appeal period. Staff urges you to contact the various City representatives, as appropriate, (e.g. the Public Works Department) as soon as possible, to obtain more information concerning specific mitigation elements recommended for this project, if you have specific questions. This information will assist you in planning for implementation of your project and will enable you to exercise your appeal rights more fully, if you choose to do so. In addition, by the end of the comment period, assuming there are no requests for reconsideration or indications of a possible appeal, we should be able to establish a. tentative public hearing date before the Hearing Examiner, should a public hearing be necessary. If you have any questions or desire clarification of the above please call Lenora Blauman of our office at 235-2550. S. erely, Dona . Erickson, MCP Zoning Administrator DKE:wr cc: Donald and Loraine Custer 2451 SW 172nd Street Seattle, WA 98166 ' CITY OF RENTON ..LL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT v Earl Clymer, Mayor Planning Division February 8, 1990 Washington State Department of Ecology Environmental Review Section Mail Stop PV-11 Olympia, WA 98504 Re: Environmental Determinations Transmitted herewith are copies of Environmental Determinations and Environmental Checklists for those projects reviewed by the Environmental Review Committee on February 7, 1990: DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED PAUL BUTRIM/PABCO CUS'I'BR/PABCO APARTMENTS ECF; SA 001-90 Request for site plan approval for a ten (10) unit multi-family development on two (2) contiguous parcels, the western parcel with R-2 (low density multi-family) zoning, and the eastern parcel with R-3 (medium density multi-family) zoning. Density levels on each site are within zoning ordinance standards. The proposed project would be located at 2514 -2510 N.E. 9th Place. BOEING COMMERCIAL AIRPLANE CO. UPGRADE VENTILATION SYS"I'EM, 10-59 BUILDING ECF 139-89 Request for environmental review of a proposed upgrade of the ventilation system in the Clean, Seal, and Paint Shop, 10-59 Building, Renton Boeing Plant; property located at North Eighth Street and Logan Avenue North. The fifteen (15) day comment period for these projects will end on February 26, 1990. Following the end of the comment period, the City will finalize its Determination unless comments received require a reevaluation. Following the finalization of the Determination, there is a required 14 day appeal period. 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2550 Environmental Determin�__�_is February 8, 1990 Page 2 If you have questions, please call Lenora Blauman or me at 235-2550. Sinceredy, Donald K. Erickson, AICP Chief, Current Planning DKE:wr cc: Mr. Craig Larson, King County Bldg. & Land Division Mr. Gregory M. Bush, Metro Department of Wildlife Mr. Joe Robels, Department of Fisheries Mr. James Lutz, Department of Transportation CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST NO. : ECF-001-90 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-001-90 PROPONENT: Paul Butrim/PABCO PROJECT NAME:. Custer/PABCO Apartments DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Applicant seeks site plan approval for a ten unit multi-family development on two contiguous parcels, the western parcel with R-2 (low density multi- family) zoning, and the eastern parcel with R-3 (medium density multi-family) zoning. Density levels on each site are within zoning ordinance standards. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 2514 - 2520 N.E. 9th Place LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton Community Development Department Current Planning Division The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43 . 21C. 030 (2) (c) . Conditions were imposed as mitigation measures by the Environmental Review Committee under their authority of Section 4-2822 (D) Renton Municipal Code (see attached sheet) . These conditions are necessary to mitigate environmental impacts identified during the environmental review process. This DNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340 (2) . . Because mitigation measures have been imposed, the lead agency will not act on this proposal for fifteen (15) days from February 12, 1990. Any interested party may submit written comments which must be submitted by 5: 00 p.m. , February 26, 1990, in order to be considered.. A fourteen (14) day appeal period will commence following the finalization of the DNS. Responsible Official: Environmental Review Committee c/o Don Erickson, Zoning Administrator Current Planning Division Community Development Department 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 PUBLICATION DATE: February 12 , 1990 DATE OF DECISION: February 7, 1990 SIGNATURE' . Kenneth E. Ny Community Develop ent Department "' Lynn jA. uttmann, Director PUb4 W ks Department DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED MITIGATION MEASURES PROJECT: Custer/PABCO Apartments PROPONENT: Paul Butrim/PABCO • ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST: ECF-001-90 APPLICATION NUMBER: SA-001-90. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Applicant seeks site plan approval for a ten unit multi-family development on two contiguous parcels, the western parcel with R-2 (low density multi-family) zoning, and the eastern parcel with R-3 (medium density multi-family) zoning. Density levels on each site are within zoning ordinance standards. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 2514 - 2520 N.E. 9th Place RECOMMENDATIONS: The Environmental Review Committee issued a Determination of Non-significance-Mitigated. 1) That the applicant provide revised site plans, in advance of site plan review, which reconfigure Buildings "A" and "B" (either through relocation of structure or reduction in density) to achieve better separation between structures to protect privacy and defensible space, to protect view corridors, to preserve air and light circulation, and to facilitate provision of emergency services. These mitigation measures are designed to address aesthetic impacts, land use impacts, housing impacts, and environmental health (noise, light and glare) impacts. [Note: At the time of site plan review it is likely that staff will recommend that the applicant provide plans which include, but may not be limited to the following improvements: 1) modification of the architectural design of Buildings "A", "B" and "C" so that scale and size are compatible with property dimensions and configuration, mitigate aesthetic impacts, and creates a livable environment; 2) increase setbacks of Buildings "A" and "B" from the east property line to improve privacy and defensible space between the site and neighboring property to the east; (3) provision of improved amenities (including, but not necessarily limited to, more spacious patios, private entryways, thematically integrated carports -- if carports are included, pedestrian linkage with 48 inch minimum walkways, exterior pedestrian-scaled lighting plans, exterior storage areas adjacent to units, screened dumpsters; if feasible, private laundries would be desirable); 4) utilization of exterior materials which are thematically integrated on all building facades, and which are attractive and durable; 5) provision of acoustically designed solid wood screening or brick/masonry walls, six feet in height, at all site boundaries in order to improve privacy and defensible space for residents and neighbors (this amenity will not fully visually separate the site .from neighboring sites, owing to changes in grade and building heights, but should be designed to improve privacy for first floor residents,visually separate the site'from the parking area of the property to the east, contain vehicular light and glare, and provide property definition); and 6) provision of a passive, congregate area for adults on the site --with covered seating, lighting, and plantings. . These recommendations are established to address, in part, Site Plan Review criteria (e.g. on-site impacts, impacts to surrounding developments).] 2) That the applicant be required to provide a plan for insulation of residential units to an interior ambient level of 45 dBA, subject to approval by the Building Division, in advance of the issuance of a building permit. 3) That the applicant provide a traffic mitigation plan (e.g. streetlighting, sidewalks, curbs, gutters) subject to approval by the Transportation Systems Division, in advance of the issuance of site preparation/building permits. ' Determination of Non-significance-mitigated Custer/PABCO Apartments ECF;SA-001-90 Page 2 4) That the applicant develop a storm water management plan, including a 25 year design storage/five year design release rate (determined by approved hydrograph method), biofiltering swales (or baffled oil/water separators to filter water on the site, and required catch basins, subject to approval by the Public Works Department, prior to the issuance of site preparation/building permits. 5) That the applicant provide watermain improvements and sanitary sewer line improvements to N.E. 9th Place (and/or pay necessary fees) to a fair share,with specific plans subject to approval by the Public Works Department in advance of the issuance of site preparation/building permits. 6) That the applicant provide the following construction mitigation measures: a) an erosion control plan; b) a plan for periodic watering down of the site; c) a plan for wheel-washing of construction vehicles prior to their leaving the site; d) an approved schedule for on-site construction activities, limiting hours of operation; e) an approved hauling schedule and haul routes; f) a cash street cleaning bond in the amount of$2,000.00; and g) a site/building identification plan (on the site and on the structures in order to facilitate emergency services and inspections). These plans are subject to approval by the Public Works Department, Planning Division, Police Department, Building Division, and Fire Prevention Bureau in advance of issuance of site preparation/building permits. In addition the applicant is encouraged to take the following action(s): • 1) Provide a voluntary contribution of$150.00 per unit for development of regional public recreation areas. (Note #1: Because two separate sites are included in this development, and because some of the required improvements for the R-3 parcel are located on the R-2 parcel, provisions will need to be made to ensure that the two portions of the development are maintained as a single unit -- this could be achieved either through conversion from two lots to a single lot, or through use/access agreements [e.g. restrictive covenants, easements] which run with the property. Specific measures will be recommended in conjunction with site plan review). (Note #2: The City code allows administrative site plan review for this project, based upon its small size. However, there has been a considerable level of neighborhood interest in this project, as a result of site design, traffic impacts, etc. Under these circumstances, staff recommend public hearing by the Hearing Examiner for site plan review.) mmdoc AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION =:1- 6 7 I y a '-, i .a y ,being first duly sworn on oath states that he/she is the Chief Clerk of the VALLEY DAILY NEWS NOTICE OF • Kent Edition • Renton Edition • Auburn Edition ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTON Daily newspapers published six (6) times a week. That said newspapers The Environmental Review Committee are legal newspapers and are now and have been for more than sixS(ERC) has issued a Determination of Non- monthsprior to the date ofpublication referred to, printed andpublished ject(s)icunder theiated for the following Re pro- ton under authority of the Renton in the English language continually as daily newspapers in Kent, King Municipal Code. County, Washington. The Valley Daily News has been approved as a legal PAUL BUTRIM/PABCO CUSTER/PABCO APARTMENTS newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for ECF; SA 001-90 King County. Reet for sitean approval fr a ten (10) unitsmullti-familpyl developmentoon two (2) contiguous parcels, the western parcel The notice in the exact form attached, was published in the Kent Edition with R-2 (low density multi-family) zoning, , Renton Edition Xx , Auburn Edition , (and not in and the eastern parcel with R-3 (medium supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers density multi-family)te zoning. Densityor levels PP g Y on each site are within zoning ordinance during the below stated period. The annexed notice a -1 •_; ; ,.. '.1 standaids. The proposed project would be located at 2514 - 2510 N.E. 9th Place. (. !vironmental Determination) 73q€ , BOEING COMMERCIAL AIRPLANE CO. UPGRADE VENTILATION SYSTEM, 10-59 BUILDING Feb . 1 2 , 1.t 9 0 ECF 139-89 was published on Request for environmental review of a t proposed upgrade of the ventilation system g t a in the Clean, Seal, and Painet Shop, 10-59 The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the wilding, entonEBioeti Strelant; propeart sum of$ Avenue North. Any interested party may submit written comments,or may appeal the above deter- mination within fifteen(15)days of the pub- lication date. Written comments received U Public Notice Subscribed and sworn before me this 1 da of P� 19 9 after 5:00 p.m., February 26, 1990, will not y be considered. A fourteen (14) day appeal period will commence following the finaliza- tion of DNS-M. The mitigation measures imposed by the City of Renton's Environ- mental Review Committee are available at the Current Planning Division of the Com- munity Development Department, Munici- pal Building, Renton, Washington 98055, Phone: 235-2550. N Public for the State of Washington Published in the Valley Daily News on residing at Auburn, ebruary 12, 1990. Act. 51067. R3969 King County, Washington VDN#87 Revised 4/89 NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated for the following project(s) under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code. PAUL BUTRIM/PABCO CUSTER/PABCO APARTMENTS ECF; SA 001-90 Request for site plan approval for a ten (10) unit multi-family development on two (2) contiguous parcels, the western parcel with R-2 (low density multi-family) zoning, and the eastern parcel with R-3 (medium density multi-family) zoning. Density levels on each site are within zoning ordinance standards. The proposed project would be located at 2514 - 2510 N.E. 9th Place. BOEING COMMERCIAL AIRPLANE CO. UPGRADE VENTILATION SYSTEM, 10-59 BUILDING ECF 139-89 Request for environmental review of a proposed upgrade of the . ventilation system in the Clean, Seal, and Paint Shop, 10-59 Building, Renton Boeing Plant; property located at North Eighth Street and Logan Avenue North. Any interested party may submit written comments, or may appeal the above determination within fifteen (15) days of the publication date. Written comments received after 5: 00 p.m. , February 26, 1,990 , will not be considered. A fourteen (14) day appeal period will commence following the finalization of DNS-M. The mitigation measures imposed by the City of Renton's Environmental Review Committee are available at the Currrent Planning Division of the Community Development Department, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington 98055, Phone: 235-2550 . Published: February 12 , 1990 • N OT I C E ENVIRONM ENTAL EDcLARATION CUSTER/PABCO APARTMENTS APPLICATION NO) ' ;SA-001-90 PROPOSED ACTION Request for site plan approval for a ten (10) unit multi-family development on two (2) contiguous parcels, the western parcel with R-2 (low density multi-family) zoning, and the eastern parcel with R-3 (medium density multi-family) zoning. Density levels on each site are within zoning Ordinance standards. GENERAL LOCATION AND OR ADDRESS Located at 2514 - 2510 N.E. 9th Place POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE [E.R.C.7 HAS DETERMINED 'THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION • DOOES 1111DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE • ENVIRONMENT. AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT f TWILL MMILL NOT BE REQUIRED. THE CITY OF RENTON WILL NOT ACT ON THIS PROPOSAL FOR 15 DAYS FROM THE DATE BELOW. COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY February 26, 1990 AN APPEAL OF THE ABOVE DETERMINATION MAY BE FILED WITH THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER BY 5:00 P.M., • FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON PLANNING DIVISION AT 235-2550. • DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION CERTIFICATION I , * HEREBY CERTIFY THAT ' Tor) ( 3) COPIES OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENT WERE POSTED BY ME IN } t�-p. - (3 ) CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON OR NEARBY THE DESCRIBED PROPERTY ON F'b, 19°• 'O ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a Notary Public, in and for the State of Washington • residing in p(=/Vy-d,L) , on the /1/4 SIGNED : auou-6-F.Uvvrii, day of lg4D NOTICE ENVIRONM ENTAL DJA&LARATION CUSTER/PABCO APARTMENTS APPLICATION NO.ECF; SA-001-90 PROPOSED ACTION Request for site plan approval for a ten (10) unit multi-family development on two (2) contiguous parcels , the western parcel with R-2 (low density multi-family) zoning , and the eastern parcel with R-3 (medium density multi-fdhily) zoning . Density levels on each site are within zoning ordinance standards. GENERAL LOCATION AND OR ADDRESS Located at 2514 - 2510 N.E . 9th Place POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION. THE CITY 'OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE ( E.R.C. ) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION ODD ES DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE • ENVIRONMENT. AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT flWILL HILL NOT BE REQUIRED. THE CITY OF RENTON WILL NOT ACT ON THIS PROPOSAL FOR 15 DAYS FROM THE DATE BELOW. COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY February 26 , 1990 AN APPEAL OF THE ABOVE DETERMINATION MAY BE FILED WITH THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER BY 5:00 P.M., _ FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON PLANNING DIVISION AT 235-2550. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION = .,' -'- 1... ' //i , RENZviv COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DE. TMENT %A��iG ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET o�RFo�oiy REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: � t-k4x Mitt �? '9 49 DATE CIRCULATED: January, 5, 1990 COMMENTS DUE: January 19, 19 0 EFC - 001-90 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-001-90 PROPONENT: Paul Butrim PROJECT TITLE: Custer 10-unit/PABCO Apts Site Plan Approval BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval for a 10- unit multi-family development on two contiguous parcels, the western parcel with R-2 zoning and the eastern parcel with/ R-3 zoning. Density levels on each site do not exceed zoning ordinance standards. LOCATION: 2514-2520 N.E. 9th 1 Renton, WA 98055 S - S SITE AREA . 63 acre BUILDING AREA (gross) : 5227 sq. ft. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth 1 2 . Air 0 ° o ° ° 3 . Water ° O ° O 4 . Plants 0 0 1 O ° ° 5. Animals ° o ° ° 6. Energy & Natural Resources ° o ° ° 7 . Environmental Health 1 ° _ o ° ° 8 . Land & Shoreline Use 0 ° o ° ° 9 . Housing ° 10 . Aesthetics ° 11. Light & Glare i ° , ° ° ° , 12 . Recreation 0 \ ° 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ° ° ° o ° ° - 14 . Transportation o ° ° 15. Public Services ° ° - 0 v ° O- ° ,�- 16 . Utilities - ° COMMENTS: c See attached. - We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. --) -:::- , (---2.------- , ' 0_.2.74 Signature of Director or thorized Representative QADate / ' Rev. 6/88 ( I PLAN REVIEW PABCO APARTMENTS 2514-2520 1. A street light plan is required which meets City standards. Two light units only. 2. Show on plans "City of Renton Survey Datum". 3. Show roadway cross section (existing and proposed) . 4. Show standard details for roadway improvements. 5. Roadway storm drainage needs to be addressed. CEM:ps CEM277 RENTOre—COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF- 001-90 APPLICATION NO(S) . : SA-001-90 PROPONENT: Paul Butrim PROJECT TITLE: CUSTER 10-UNIT/PABCO APARTMENTS SITE PLAN APPROVAL BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval for a 10- unit multi-family development on two contiguous parcels, the western parcel with R-2 zoning and the eastern parcel with R-3 zoning. Density levels on each site do not exceed zoning ordinance standards. LOCATION: 2514-2520 N.E. 9th Street Renton, WA 98055 TO: ' PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON JANUARY 19, 1990. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED • t4PI %/DATE /7 SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATT REV. 6/88 roo1oCori?H5 J �� , ncto .•' II -7, 4--.- 4..,__.... . . •,.. i i a' ., 4iir t,,,..,--• _. , , -!..i:."-- - — i m 0 1. it' •,,,?' -. • # '4 • .11X-.' AV I. .• 4 ..ex -.. ,.. ... • .. ..., `'''' ' v•1 •-.;..1 • : . .. . 'WV . . _ _ 4 \ , \ -... • , . , i)Ahl iori© ,D7a\_ 01 r IN,`• 'A - a` I # fv . ____. t o :,_r . 4.. :0 if �y 'le •d f y f Y . i �,. 010101 NI�c' 14.' 1' i i i I... w .V • .. I t l , .' • .,. iq• .4 .. .' • 3 • r ... 11 .,. ._...„. ..... . . g A$.• .. • g4 . . . t 11111111:1 *II 4,' - .11 • • ; . ••-.,.;- -4. 1 Am i :•1 r.-.. . V ' 1 ki 4 ....".-c:Iii••• . •r- : .• . t.. Vit........--,•-• .4. . ^....... •••. • ..i.' , 4-1`ier Z , • ...;" ,10.'..0 P• ‘ lie - , . ... A • ...I ",'"•;•;•; • '' •N.,-:-,......-1-:.... * J., • .t "t. _ .. . , • . . , .. , •, .0:'' • . • I •-•_ t t • .j ' i'k. ' .'441.• • . • 1 1 - 4,.. i 'A ' I PLAN REVIEW PABCO APARTMENTS 2514-2520 1. A street light plan is required which meets City standards. Two light units only. 2. Show on plans "City of Renton Survey Datum". 3 . Show roadway cross section (existing and proposed) . P ) 4. Show standard details for roadway improvements. 5. Roadway storm drainage needs to be addressed. CEM:ps CEM277 • ' REfl ,N COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT L��'ARTMENT p,� `0� -� ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEETk. ® ���o,vp'b 49 NO REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: \f __- ,ev -Vt. `9O DATE CIRCULATED: January 5, 1990 COMMENTS D 1: January 19,J4 EFC - 001-90 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-001-90 =PROPONENT: Paul Butrim [JAM] Md V PROJECT TITLE: Custer 10-unit/P4BCO Apts Site Plan Approval BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval for a 10- unit multi-family development on two contiguous parcels, the western parcel with R-2 zoning and the eastern parcel with R-3 zoning. Density levels on each site do not exceed zoning ordinance standards. LOCATION: 2514-2520 N.E.• 9th . Renton, WA 98055 SITE AREA . 63 acre BUILDING AREA (gross) : 5227 sq. ft. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth 0 ° o ° O 2 . Air ° o O O 3 . Water ° 4 . Plants ° 5 . Animals ° . ° O O ° 6. Energy & Natural Resources ° o O O 7 . Environmental Health 0 ° . ° O ° 8 . Land & Shoreline Use ° 0 ° o ° ° 9 . Housing ° 0 ° O ° O 10 . Aesthetics ° ° ° ° 11. Light & Glare ° O ° ° 12 . Recreation ° 0 0 ° 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ° ° ° 14 . Transportation ° 15. Public Services ° o ° ° 16 . Utilities ° ° COMMENTS: i . We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. f /� /9 9o-, Si nature of Director or Authorized Representative , to g P Rev. 6/88 REN .,II COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DErARTMENT DEVELOPMENT`APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF- 001-90 APPLICATION NO(S) . : SA-001-90 PROPONENT: Paul Butrim PROJECT TITLE: CUSTER 10-UNIT/PABCO APARTMENTS SITE PLAN APPROVAL BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:' Applicant seeks site plan approval for a10-' unit multi-family development on two contiguous parcels, the western parcel ) with R-2 zoning and the eastern parcel with R-3 zoning. , Density levels on each_ site do not exceed zoning ordinance standards. LOCATION: 2514-2520 N.E. 9th Street Renton, WA 98055 TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: • UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU , POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION C- SHORT RANGE • LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. .PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS, TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P.M. ON JANUARY " 19, 1990. • REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: fire, Prevecn� APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS ' NOT APPROVED i Any development and/or construction shall comply with current Fire and Building Codes and Ordi- nances. A sawed means of approved access is required. Fire Department access roads/lanes shall be paved minimum width 20'; minimum height 13' 6". Yes No Preliminary fire flow calculations show a fire flow of 1o?s'o is required. . 2 hydrants with a minimum flow of i,o-r' gpm each is required. Primary hydrant is required to be within Art) 'feet of the structure. Secondary hydrants are required to be within 30o feet of the structure. An approved automatic sprinkler system is required to protect the total structure. Yes No All fire department access roads are to be paved and installed prior to construction. Yes No All fire hydrants are-re uired to nstalled and approved prior'to construction. Yes No it/444440. . �o � DATE .y� . � 9d URE OF /9 SIGNAT DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV: 6/88 y_ ,, /owl/:vA,e/ D X/ ,. . `' RCQUIRCI) FIRE FLOW CALCULATIONS 1. HAZARD IDENTIFICATION INFORMATION NAME /38Go �/�TS • • U.B.C. CLASS OF BUILD ADDRESS 5--A1d /V-G, Q%.� S'T FIRE MGMT AREA 2. DETERMINE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION - CLASS (CIRCLE-ONE): I - II IV III r FIRE-RESISTIVE NON-COMBUSTIBLE • ORDINARY w MIXED (NOTE: IF "MIXED", SEE SPECIAL INSTRUCTION FOR AREA AND BASIC FIRE FLOW) 3. DETERMINE AREA; - GROUND FLOOR AREA: FT2 (A) g� 6' • NUMBER OF STORIES: TOTAL BUILDING AREA: 020 4. DETERMINE BASIC.FIRE FLOW FROM TABLE 01, USING AREA (A): /S-OO GPM (B) 5. DETERMINE OCCUPANCY FACTOR ADJUSTMENT: ADJUSTMENT: — -7 yj0 GPM (C) IF LOW HAZARD, SUBTRACT UP TO 25% OF CB): IF HIGH HAZARD,; ADD UP TO 25% OF (B) 6. COMPUTE SUB-TOTAL CB+C): CIF B+C IS LESS THAN 500 GPM, INSERT 500 GPM) 7Z 0 GPM CD) 7. DETERMINE SPRINKLER ADJUSTMENT: ADJUSTMENT: -Z - • GPM CE) CIF COMPLETELY SPRINKLERED, SUBTRACT UP TO 50% OF CD): IF ,LIGHT HAZARD OCCUPANCY AND FIRE RESISTIVE OR NON-COMBUSTIBLE CONSTRUCTION, SUBTRACT UP TO 75% OF CD). 8. DETERMINE EXPOSURE ADJUSTMENT•: • USING THE TABLE AT LEFT AS A GUIDE, ENTER THE SEPARATION AND ADJUSTMENt FOR EACH OF THE "FOUR FACES" OF THE BUILDING IN THE TABLE AT THE RIGHT: SEPARATION MAN. ADJUSTMENT EXPOSURE SEPARATION ACT. ADJ. 110 -- 10 30 25% MAX. NORTH io ADD MC- % 20% MAX. EAST vs ADD Ar $ 31 - 60 15% MAX. SOUTH ' 7Z' ADD •/6 $ • 61 -100 10% MAX. ' WEST 101 -150 rz ADD �o � 5% MAX. TOTAL % OF ADJUSTMENT 150 OR 4-HR WALL 0% MAX. : (NOT TO EXCEED 75%) /9 U % (TOTAL % ADJUSTMENT TIMES CD) ADJUSTMENT: -I- LI Z. GPM CF) 9. DETERMINE ROOF AND SIDING COVERING ADJUSTMENT: • • CIF SHINGLE COVERING, ADD 500 GPM) ADJUSTMENT ---e— GPM (G) 10. COMPUTE ESTIMATED FIRE FLOW REQUIRED: �. CIF D+E+F+G IS LESS THAN 500 GPM, INSERT 500 GPM) CIF D+E+F+G IS GREATER THAN 12,000 GPM, INSERT 12,430 GPM) CD+E+F+G) REQUIRED FIRE FLOW: S . 1ZSU GPM CH) 11. SIGNED: /z41-„4 ` 1:ATE mac. 7, /9/0 f RE1.'w:.N COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT L___�RTMENT o,�9B�` r �S ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET 4'J ( ®cP 04o4, ,99 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: I \C-k� \/p,. 0 DATE CIRCULATED: January 5, 1990 COMMENTS POUF--Janaa-r-y 7.9 9fl.t EFC - 001-90 - rAPPLICATION NO(S) : SA-001-90 + �� �I } I("f,. JAN 5 • 1990 IJH PROPONENT: Paul Butrim Li PROJECT TITLE: Custer 10-unit/PABCO Apts Site P lan Approva�]l'��-)t BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site, plan approval for a 10- unit multi-family development on two contiguous parcels, the western parcel with R-2 zoning and the eastern parcel with R-3 zoning. Density levels on each site do not exceed zoning ordinance standards. LOCATION: 2514-2520 N.E. 9th - Renton, WA 98055 SITE AREA . 63 acre BUILDING AREA/'(gross) : 5227 sq. ft. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION ' IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth , .{ / ° ° ° 2 . Air ° 3 . Water 00 1 O O , G 4 . Plants- , ° ° 0 O ° oa N 5. Animals ° ' ' ° ° ° : o 6. Energy- & Natural Resources ° . ° o ° o 7 . Environmental Health i ° 0 0 o O O 8 . Land & Shoreline Use - 0 ° 9 . Housing . ° ' (, ° o ° 0 1 10. Aesthetics - ° o ° 0 11. Light •& Glare ° ° o 12 . Recreation 0 f ° O O O 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ° o ° ° 14 . Transportation 0 ° O C O 15 . Public Services 0 , ° O 0 1 o 16 . Utilities ° 0 ' COMMENTS: ' We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impactor areas where additio 1 information is needed to properly assess this proposal. . �oA� /.-�"�� Signature Z=" Director or Authorized Representative Date Rev. 6/88 - I r I. .. RENT:; . COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DI ARTMENT • DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION. REVIEW SHEET ECF- 001-90 ,APPLICATION NO(S) . : SA-001=90 . PROPONENT: Paul Butrim PROJECT TITLE: CUSTER 10-UNIT/PABCO APARTMENTS' SITE ;PLAN APPROVAL BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval -for. a 10- unit multi-family development on two contiguous parcels, the western parcel with R-2 zoning and the eastern parcel with R-3 zoning. '.Density levels on each site do not exceed zoning ordinance standards: , LOCATION: 2514-2520 N.E. 9th Street Renton, WA 98055 . TO: 1 ' PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: . ENGINEERING DIVISION • TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU i POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT . BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION • • ' SHORT RANGE J LONG RANGE ' . . PARKS AND' RECREATION DEPARTMENT • I OTHERS: • COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS 'APPLICATION- SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF. THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON JANUARY 19, 1990. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: B G- D G • APPROVED ;APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED gga/h. 0 Asti ec t3' ' VQ • /7 , . /c cz DATE ' d -",c� SIGNATURE OF DI C1'OR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV, 6/8.8 u, ,.\ .., REN ,:1� COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DLr°�RTMENT 'D •Y - .. . oNmoo ENVIRONMENTAL :CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET q,�, „ ,__ _ - - 44 N REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: IT'altCc� : .. a '`, DATE CIRCULATED: January 5., 1990 , COMMENTS DUE: January 19, "'.9P.')_ EFC - 001-90 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-001-90 ' i , ' PROPONENT: Paul Butrim I PROJECT TITLE: Custer 10-unit/PABCO Apts Site Plan; Approval . BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval for a 10- unit multi-family development on two contiguous parcels, the western parcel with R-2 zoning and the eastern parcel with R-3 zoning. Density levels op '''- each site do not exceed zoning ordinance standards. ; I LOCATION: 2514-252G N.E. 9th i . Renton, WA 98055 ' SITE AREA . 63 acre BUILDING AREA (gross) : 5227 sq. ft. IMPACT REVIEW ON 'ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS' PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR ' MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth ° o ° ° 2 . Air ° o ° y ° 3 . Water _ ' ° ° • ° ° 4 . Plants ° 1 o ° ° 5. Animals • ° o ° • ° 6. Energy & Natural Resources ° ° ° ° \7 . Environmental Health ° ° 8 . Land & Shoreline Use ( ° 9 . Housing ° o ° ° 10. ' Aesthetics ' ° 11. Light & Glare , ° ° ° 12 . Recreation ° ° ° ° 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ° - ° - ° ° 14 . 'Transportation _ ° ! ° • 15. Public Services ° 16 . Utilities ° COMMENTS: • &AlekiWqart cif\ \I awiLehvb . Waal vjaLi Ith4i4k- ao 4 wittt- IA) vamil_ . , .H-JD took f ii-,e ‘L-- We have reviewed:this application with particular attention to those areas ' in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal.. ) i . 1 ) \ 110 • Signature of Direc or or Authorized Representative 1 . Date Rev. 6/8-8 1 RENTL- COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEL--ATMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF- 001-90 APPLICATION NO(S) . : SA-001=90 PROPONENT: Paul Butrim PROJECT TITLE: CUSTER 10-UNIT/PABCO APARTMENTS SITE PLAN APPROVAL BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval for a 10- unit multi-family development on two contiguous parcels, the western parcel with R-2 zoning and the eastern parcel with R-3 zoning. Density levels on each site do not exceed zoning ordinance standards. LOCATION: 2514-2520 N.E. 9th Street Renton, WA 98055 TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON JANUARY 19, 1990. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: APPROVED V APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED CPItAnA0VaA-- v I MUA, \DOW AA496,)&,.. Yi t1'6-1147114:-A DATE \ii 1 U SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AVTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 6/88 RENZ__. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DE,_1ATMENT ® cs° ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET �-Q 4)4'I j� REVIEWING DEPARTMENT. (706n l A- 3'� H( DATE CIRCULATED: January 5, 1990 COMMENTS DUE: January 19,�� 0 EFC - 001-90 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-001-90 PROPONENT: Paul Butrim PROJECT TITLE: Custer 10-unit/PABCO Apts Site Plan Approval BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval for a 10- unit multi-family development on two contiguous parcels, the western parcel with R-2 zoning and the eastern parcel with R-3 zoning. Density levels on each site do not exceed zoning ordinance standards. LOCATION: 2514-2520 N.E. 9th Renton, WA 98055 SITE AREA . 63 acre BUILDING AREA (gross) : 5227 sq. ft. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth ° o ° ° 2 . Air ° o ° ° 3 . Water ° o ° ° 4 . Plants ° o ° ° 5 . Animals ° o ° 6 . Energy & Natural Resources ° ° o ° ° 7 . Environmental Health ° o ° ° 8 . Land & Shoreline Use ° o ° ° 9 . Housing ° ° ° 10. Aesthetics ° o ° ° 11. Light & Glare ° o ° ° 12 . Recreation ° o 7 0 ° 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ° • ° ° 14 . Transportation * ° o ° ° 15. Public Services ° ° o ° 16 . Utilities ° COMMENTS: G00121¢4 C--1p►J 0€0 1b7 S1 d I4 '3E pitDRe'sserS a To (Lew Tv-oxvm`ri eX CrxmAlo( L,(off, S4bu Lo j n, "twee TS-PAHA Ailar‘. ‘404c 2 Si:pc.tzs rpaC, MIA? 14‘ ltD41t. of 15". -15tb(p. 5e ' V .1 U&t.'4. ('I ) 'Me V isi3►L ety or "(yam Z 'Mew e4i Rriortmes, akiJ looe Tway liteA c kA,uc,g 7 -nat. . lara.l4sca„A06 7 We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. a04 LAA_P-'-- --Si nature f Dr1i . D. rector or Authorized Representative Dat g P Rev. 6/88 ;pl • RENTON-- OMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEP �1MENT • V n DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET • ECF- 001-90 APPLICATION NO(S).. : SSA-001-90 V PROPONENT: Paul Butrim J PROJECT TITLE: CUSTER 10-UNIT/PABCO APARTMENTS SITE PLAN APPROVAL BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:• Applicant seeks site plan approval for a 10- . unit multi-family development on two contiguous' parcels, the western parcel with R-2 zoning and the eastern parcel with R-3 zoning. Density levels on each site do. not exceed zoning ordinance standards. LOCATION: 2514-2520 N.E. 9th Street Renton, WA 98055 V V TO: r PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT - SCHEDULED ERC DATE: ENGINEERING 'DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: ' UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION • PLANNING DIVISION V SHORT RANGE; 'LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS. REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY . DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT /BY 5: 00 -P.M. ON JANUARY_ 19, 19,90. V • REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: (: )ber t (., , , ' ,_APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED ter-lc- l5 l4 MUAIO %nice Scold '_,OF CoµP. tre 1b tc.✓. D -Meaty r".Ittehir1 1.40..C.Tt -rroma,/, . t - DATE 1/040) SIGNATUR F DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 6/88 • RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: f I DATE CIRCULATED: January 5, 1990 COMMENTS DUE: January 19, 1990 EFC - 001-90 �C FREN fS6®N T®M APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-001-90 JAN 1 6 1990 PROPONENT: Paul Butrim ���t PROJECT TITLE: Custer 10-unit/PABCO Apts Site Plan Approval BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval for a 10- unit multi-family development on two contiguous parcels, the western parcel with R-2 zoning and the eastern parcel with R-3 zoning. Density levels on each site do not exceed zoning ordinance standards. LOCATION: 2514-2520 N.E. 9th Renton, WA 98055 SITE AREA . 63 acre BUILDING AREA (gross) : 5227 sq. ft. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth ° 2 . Air 0 ' O 3 . Water ° ° 4. Plants 0 ° o O O 5. Animals 6. Energy & Natural Resources ° o ° ° 7 . Environmental Health ° O 8. Land & Shoreline Use ° 9. Housing ° ° 10. Aesthetics ° 11. Light & Glare ° 12 . Recreation i`< ° o ° 13 . Historic & Cultural .Preservation 0 ° 14. Transportation ° 15. Public Services ° O 16. Utilities ° ° 0 00MMENTS: /c1 A . � � �ir�"c�r� ✓ U -v=- mac,-�Y �h� v We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal 67-4 -Signature of Director or 'Authorized Representative Date Rev. 6/88 RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET A ECF- 001-90 , APPLICATION NO(S) . : SA-001-90 C ® �,41/ 49 PROPONENT: Paul Butrim 'MN ��TON ,PROJECT TITLE: CUSTER 10-UNIT/PABCO APARTMENTS SITE PLAN` AL 'O BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approva 60 a 10- unit multi-family development on two contiguous parcels, the western parcel with R-2 zoning and the eastern parcel with R-3 zoning. Density levels on each site do not exceed zoning ordinance standards. • LOCATION: 2514-2520 N.E. 9th Street Renton, WA 98055 TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU - POLICE DEPARTMENT r ' COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN' WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON JANUARY 19, 1990. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED l r DATE SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 6/88 MEMORANDUM To L-E Date ? ' i 7 '9O From OE i 1 l-'I Kin Subject PACpco ) 4 ZL,Ocp, SA-- 001 -90 )110At C.A( po -' C_oOt< L.A 11) I'-VC.) tRP8wIru(aS PRovtOo, w 1 JAL uu t LL LOG,cTC(J 1 Co 11 �-I fit 51011U(0 , ) / Ct6P A rLA t3uIL.011v(p Y \ I I z .0 ` ' .REN1:::1 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT D.:._ iRTMENT AZ4<<' ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET 4NTO/pN REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: �kLp'k„ ' DATE CIRCULATED: January 5, 1990 COMMENTS DUE: January 10i,1V0 ( ® i EFC - 001-90 APPLICATION NO(S) : -SA-001-90 PROPONENT: Paul Butrim PROJECT TITLE: 'Custer 10-unit/PABCO Apts Site Plan Approval BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval for a 10- unit multi-family development on two contiguous parcels., the western parcel with R-2 zoning and the eastern parcel with R-3 zoning. Density levels on each site do not exceed zoning ordinance standards. LOCATION: 2514-2520 N.E. 9th Renton, WA 98055 r SITE AREA . 63 acre BUILDING AREA (gross) : 5227 sq. ft. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT , NECESSARY 1. Earth 0 0 ° ° ° ° 2 . Air ° 3 . Water ° o ° ° 4 . Plants 0 ° 0 O O ° 5. Animals 0 0 0 o O ° 6. Energy & Natural Resources 0 0 ° 0 ° 0 7 . Environmental Health - 0 o ° 8 . Land & Shoreline Use 00 ° O O ° l9 . Housing 0 ° ° ° ° 10. Aesthetics ° o ° ° • 11. Light & Glare ° o ° ° 12 . Recreation 0 0 ° 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ° ° ° 14 . Transportation 0 ° o ° ° 15. Public Services 0 0 o ° O 16. Utilities ° ° ° COMMENTS : 0 c`ESCARI pTI0 1\1 OK( EJ\1V1 Ro hl v 1 A)mL G} cKLA s`' I-rE M Ion, t SATES i l4 T I-f I S 1 S Au `` I I " 0 011 Acp1. Ia,c)Cp - 11V 6r uo�. O p Rov'i 0E '1"R-EL-( G LENK)I rU(o G iNs I-! fz)o rJ o 0 C3) c k•) rtic I5-1-lk)( zv, ►=-1 K T R ts& r 31 '6 s� `vN� �J? 1-r 1 r 1E I Sortt• , 41 N}t'1� '1 T pRo 14t v w T IT � o eF a. jy ` Ma We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas., in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. ti l) �,t� O In11R9O Signature of D. ctor or Authorized Representative Date Rev. 6/88 " RENT , COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DE tTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF- 001-90 APPLICATION NO(S) . : SA-001-90 PROPONENT: Paul Butrim PROJECT TITLE: CUSTER 10-UNIT/PABCO APARTMENTS SITE PLAN APPROVAL BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval for a 10- unit multi-family development on two contiguous parcels, the western parcel with R-2 zoning and the eastern parcel with R-3 zoning. Density levels on each site do not exceed zoning ordinance standards. LOCATION: 2514-2520 N.E. 9th Street Renton, WA 98055 TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION >KSHORT RANGE LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON JANUARY 19, 1490. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: GU f LANhi1A)Cr bl V I SUN/ APPROVED X APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED a" (-O O7l-J 'ice) 4-3 '' ) OE ZOl7ICE, AcL,Oni(p 3_' kOOit IA �. srt 4 W Si FADED PRAV Psc-1 scP-610 .� s rA 3Cvx At. U ( S I ' Gfi. K1 1 - � `r- �.) pik,oce..- 10 PC1.001, c)R,e vs 6L6 s P M,E THE, fux5KPL P 'J I r.lOI SAT ., ' ' Lit-C)6 CF STOKAO& s T1i€ TE9J JT 2 , %O(.0&ti51" 19.001(00 AOD 1%OU cbTO2j6t) s p pvcA,, pcii.t+1N /l.o►vc, P TIo5/c a. P DEST) J A) l�l,E, 0,UTsI OE Lv, 'UG 31 oo uo ()Ito 0106 DATE SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE C)VEZ REV. 6/8 8 (1 ALL U,ry►1- S HoULO Aram 1-I4 Xw S P R1TL) Li\Uivy-f FAG LaTI , 4 0t ; REN'. 'r COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT D]- . ,RTMENT e�o14bb ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET 41/ , A' REVIEWING DEPARTMET: Jtc5YVv1 �A _ 7 '4 N 1 DATE CIRCULATED: January 5, 1990 COMMENTS DUE: January 19, 190 EFC - 001-90 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-001-90 PROPONENT: Paul Butrim PROJECT TITLE: Custer 10-unit/PABCO Apts Site Plan Approval BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval for a 10- unit multi-family 'development on two contiguous parcels, the western parcel with R-2 zoning and the eastern parcel with R-3 zoning. Density levels on each site do not exceed zoning ordinance standards. LOCATION: 2514-2520 N.E. 9th • Renton, WA 98055 SITE AREA . 63 acre BUILDING AREA (gross) : 5227 sq. ft. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth ° o ° o 2 . Air O 0 ° 3 . Water ° ° o 4 . Plants ° 5. Animals , ° 6. Energy & Natural Resources ° 0 0 ° 7 . Environmental Health ° ° ° o 8 . Land & Shoreline Use ° 9 . Housing ° ° ° o 10. Aesthetics ° ° o ° 11. Light & Glare ° ° o 0 12 . Recreation ° ° ° o 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ° 14 . Transportation ° 15. Public Services ° 16 . Utilities ° ,X ° COMMENTS: On- & 5 for d'i wa ie�r d-e 10.1 yv►-vs* be 41 Z$>eA-"^ -d ej P ll d es iy t reSe�s e r C a o 1 fYlti 6 b- Cdi`l u' 117 SLS k / ro h Y► "j`O, o►^ A S�N4i 14� Q/prOVe4 c1ro �iY�t�h frAe, t [ow For re -d n- d /n us t /Noah thahodtf ov.e.tm• POWs " We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. /J / rivio Signature of Director or Authorized Representative D to ��1 Rev. 6/88 RENTC_. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEFTMENT i r\ DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF- 001-90. - APPLICATION NO(S) . : SA-001-90 PROPONENT:• Paul Butrim PROJECT TITLE: CUSTER 10-UNIT/PABCO APARTMENTS SITE PLAN APPROVAL BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval for a 10- unit multi-family development on two contiguous parcels, the western parcel with R-2 zoning and the eastern parcel with R-3" zoning. Density levels on each site do not exceed zoning ordinance standards. LOCATION: 2514-2520 N.E. 9th Street Renton, WA 98055 TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC' DATE: ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: ,_ UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION 9 SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNINGDIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON JANUARY 19 , 1990. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS •)( NOT APPROVED �-h a rtiv .4�orr r� ErnS1o3 Sedc Jiltoi ( i, f 1916P �-. ► a`- !ems t zoo fea— rs r p r re4- 6 r 4/a4-€4r- 71,1471 r 0-r- rel.;reo, ,64-r-a--4 0%1 r- ' °r $ a r �° g w/ be r dire u �'v^!� ' `{z� (o C-e) U u S f be_ re, r r(I co a .e 1 ve S Con—s - a G� i S df r e-a-4 Fir‘ +0 1142- Atct (w, iva e.o f(2c revi r 5' -, A 5 fit' S�-®�r+�r�a ' G�Y'cc ��-a-�/A�.pv" l�v► sh�w�"� f�l�(a o ref `�i$ C.a'k&( /3c ,�i pies 041 c1 g011 &VI CI' 14,044 - &'121/4t°A`- 3 a l!S f i4 i �I ✓ O&, DATE 1 10td SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 6/88 A REN"iviv COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DLrrtRTMENT. 0,k. ®//y , ,�, ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET ). �j REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: °� `�. T��O DATECIRCULATED: January 5, 1990 COMMENTS DUE: January 19, 1990 r4-q) EFC - 001-90 r . APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-001-90 PROPONENT: Paul Butrim PROJECT TITLE: Custer 10-unit/PABCO Apts Site Plan Approval ' BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval for a 10- unit multi-family development on two contiguous parcels., the western parcel with R-2 zoning and the eastern parcel with R-3 zoning. Density levels on each site do not exceed zoning ordinance standards. LOCATION: 2514-2520 N.E. 9th Renton, WA 98055 SITE AREA . 63 acre BUILDING AREA (gross) : 5.227 sq. ft. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE 7 MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth ° ° ° ° 2 . Air 0 ° ° o 3 . Water f ° O ° ° 4 . Plants ° O ° O 5. ! Animals ° ° 0 ° 6. Energy. & Natural Resources ° ° 0 o O ° 7 . Environmental Health ° o .l 0 0 8 . Land & Shoreline Use ° o O 9 . Housing 0 ° O o 10. Aesthetics ° O O ° 11. Light & Glare ° o ° ° 12 . Recreation ° ° 0 O 0 0 J - 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ° O ° ° 14 . Transportation ° 0 0 o r o ° 15 . Public Services ° O 0 ° 16 . Utilities X ° ° COMMENTS: `JEE COHMWS OU VPICfl Q _ 9tUEIAPNets1 Afeamilm4 rAEView SHEET, 1 s of oejE to pHersc fees svx Kr A-rra C%En ao, 4.L.Ct z i z CO We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. gi \ Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date Rev. 6/88 RENT(,. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DE1__=..TMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET r ` ECF- 001-90 APPLICATION NO (S) . : SA-001-90 PROPONENT: Paul Butrim PROJECT TITLE: CUSTER 10-UNIT/PABCO APARTMENTS SITE PLAN APPROVAL BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval for a 10- unit multi-family development on two contiguous parcels, the western parcel with R-2 zoning and the eastern parcel with R-3 zoning. Density levels on each site do not exceed zoning ordinance standards. LOCATION: 2514-2520 N.E. 9th Street Renton, WA 98055 TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON JANUARY 19, 1990. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: WAT(R Unit £i&R Dt APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS ,C NOT APPROVED Remmu susiWm- of St;PArtfil ciulL 'Putt* Fort, W111-eRha1P itiPRO.EHetaS o1+ NE Celt. PLACE Ma) iNYC mini cs of 2 tArlt.1 HYOR•Ari'fS Tr, PRvuio6 iite fine Plow pC14Pt1Q f01t TH& No PO S60 VEUEtbpHE 31 I��UE(OPNEN'( f665 StteET Aim cxt O . Lai. 2 Za z,) Q 1fr4S Ka cog tam tuiT R61'� 91NJ 0 MO Fow DeVeto Pea 3 t;rrertSiow cY uTi<aTi6S ttfir I of 2 A'��Glbti bfetle/ DATE I- 17- qo SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 6/88 ' --FEE APPLICATION: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIE, SHEET Cz1 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET q PLAN REVIEW ROUTING SLIP OTHER / (7)12-1,: e.f.O DATE: /-1 APPLICANT:JOB ADDRESS: �?,S'/V_ 4L5-40 X 7tr NATURE OF WORK: /4 244.c.4.:td 06 )4 4.&4 ..e . O PROPERTY MANAGEMENT //9- 9D DATE RECEIVED Comments Due BY PROPERTY MGMT. Comments or suggestions regarding this application should be provided in writing. Please provide comments to the Comm. Dev. Dept. (C.D.D.) by 5:00 p.m. on above date. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION A FEES APPLIED CANNOT APPLY FEES ❑ LEGAL DESCRIPTION ❑ NEED MORE INFORMATION ❑ SQUARE FOOTAGE ❑ FRONT FOOTAGE ❑VICINITY MAP It is the intent of this development fee analysis to put the developer/owner on notice, that the fees quoted below will apply to the subject site upon development of the property. All quoted fees are due and payable at the time the construction permit is issued to install the on-site and off-site improvements (i .e. underground utilities, street improvements, etc.) PROJECT COST LATECOMER LATECOMER AGREEMENT - WATER NO PER. FTG. FEE CITY HELD .- 0- PRIVATE DEVELOPER HELD LATECOMERS AGREEMENT - SEWER CITY HELD D - PRIVATE DEVELOPER HELD _o SPECIAL UTILITY CONNECTION CHARGE - WATER UNITS SUCC FEE Single family residential dwelling unit $300/lot x Apartment, Condo, each multiplex unit $175/ea. unit x !0 ol� ..50. ' P le Commercial/Industrial $.04/sq. ft. of property x SPECIAL UTILITY CONNECTION CHARGE - SEWER Single family residential dwelling unit $300/lot x Apartment, condo, each multiplex unit $175/ea. unit x !p Commercial/Industrial $.04/sq.ft. of property x SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DI TRICT 'ospital Area) WATER UNITS SAD FEE DEVELOPMENTS WITH 150w GPM F RE FLOWS OR LESS: Area Charge $.0.014 p'r sq.ft. x Frontage Charge 1. .00 per front ft. x DEVELOPMENTS WITH GREAT" THAN 1500 GPM FIRE FLOWS: Area Charge $0. oi : per sq.ft. x Frontage Char. - $1: .00 per front ft. x --©- SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT (Ho -y Crk. Intercptr) - SEWER UNITS SAD FEE AREA CHARGES: Residential dwelling un' s, apartments or equivalents; $'50 ler dwelling unit x Commercial developme $.05 per sq.ft. of • 'ss site area x FRONT FOOTAGE CHARGES: $37.19 per Front 't. (o ea. side) x $74.38 per fr.f . (prpty .In both sides of imprv. ) x ,4 :4,-t- - /qqD.TOTAL: $ 3,SDD. .o The above quoted fees do NOT include inspection fees, side sewer permits, r/w permit fees or the cost of water meters. &Lt./11- DATE / `e- 90 Signature of Director or Author zed Representative el° 8' RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ail® ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET �A o V REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: S2_ .3,3 UI ,,T1,` �y r 2 2 1cc �� a DATE CIRCULATED: January 5, 1990 COMMENTS DUE: January 19, EFC - 001-90 . APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-001-90 PROPONENT: Paul Butrim PROJECT TITLE: Custer 10-unit/PABCO Apts Site Plan.Approval . BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval for a 10- unit multi-family development on two. contiguous parcels, the-western parcel witbi R-2 zoning and the eastern parcel with R-3 zoning. Density levels op each site do not exceed_ zoning ordinance standards. ` LOCATION: 2514-2520 N.E. 9th , Renton, WA 98055 ' SITE AREA . 63 acre BUILDING AREA (gross) : 5227 sq. ft. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE • MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY _1. Earth ° >G ° ° ° z 2 . Air ° o 0 ° 3-, Water X ° , 4 . Plants - ° ' ° , 0 o ° ° 5 . Animals J ° o O ° 6. Energy & Natural Resources ° i ° 7. Environmental Health ' . ° ° - 0 o ° ° 8 . Land & Shoreline Use ° 01 ° i o ° ° 9. Housing ° ' ° o ° 10. Aesthetics I _ ° ' o ° ° 11. Light & Glare ° 12 . Recreation ° o ° ° 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ° \ ° f 0 ° 0 14 . Transportation ' W ° ° 15.- Public Services - , ° ° 0 16 . Utilities ° X ° ' ° r COMMENTS: , We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have 'identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal.6--.. 11/4c2i0e// / eir I /4,4o Signature of Director or Authorized Representative . • Date 1 Rev. 6/88 A) RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF- 001-90 APPLICATION NO(S) . : SA-001-90 PROPONENT: Paul Butrim PROJECT TITLE: CUSTER 10-UNIT/PABCO APARTMENTS SITE PLAN APPROVAL BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval for a 10- unit multi-family development on two contiguous parcels, the western parcel with R-2 zoning and the eastern parcel with R-3 zoning. Density levels on each site do not exceed zoning ordinance standards. LOCATION: 2514-2520 N.E. 9th Street Renton, WA 98055 TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU' POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P.M. ON JANUARY 19, 1990. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED itS ®ALz )e ® 6- �� ah6Wid& a:4074W °.etilig Oatz-Pyth-.5 %Et. 560ezorg, - 5-y ,,,. //44. 71-th7 /LA, ae_ g":ge/v,e- Z/A 7/Fez,4- A0.17.41/6-i 676 SIGNATURE 0 DIR CTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 6/88 OF RED ;% ©„a. __ O 4 Co' 09 - SEP1 OF PENDING • SITE PLAN APPLICATI I N DESCR 1 P11 oN : Custer IUnit/PABCO Apartmentsts • ECF ; SA-001-90 Applicant seeks, site plan approval for a 10-unit multi-family development on two contiguous parcels , the western parcel with R-2 zoning and the eastern parcel with R-3 zoning. Density levels on each site do not exceed zoning ordinance standards . GENERAL LOCATION AND/OR ADDRESS: 2514-2520 N.E . 9th Place PUBLIC APPROVALS . REQUIRED : o Environmental Review o Site Plan Approval o Building Permit . CERTIFICATION r , I , Sowelo,, , HEREBY CERTIFY THAT -3 COPIES OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENT WERE POSTED BY ME IN 3 CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON OR NEARBY THE DESCRIBED PROPERTY • ON j- 91- 90 ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a Notary Public, in and for the State of Washington • residing in f ;',e,1/70a,/ , on the r]£k day of Gl p`�� SIGNED : a y ,�a- e 1 � .(Q.jen. OF RE @0 ) q?•- SEP101O OF PENDING SITE PLAN APPLICATION DESCRIPTION : Custer 1ents0-Unit/PABCO Apartm ECF; SA-001-90 Applicant seeks site plan approval for a 10-unit multi-family development on two contiguous parcels , the western parcel with R-2 zoning and the eastern parcel with R-3 zoning . Density levels on each site do not exceed zoning ordinance standards . GENERAL LOCATION AND/OR ADDRESS: 2514-2520 N.E . 9th Place ---00 1 i T REQUIRED : PUBLIC APPROVALS o Environmental Review o Site Plan Approval o Building Permit PUBLIC COMMENTS WILL BE RECEIVED BY THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT .ANYTIME PRIOR TO PUBLIC HEARINGS AND DURING PUBLIC HEARINGS. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CALL THE CITY OF RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT 235-2550 THIS NOTICE NOT TO BE REMOVED WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION %o CITY OF RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor Planning Division January 5, 1990 Paul Butrim 17159 NE 5th Street Bellevue, WA 98008 Re: File #SA-ECF-001-90 Custer 10-unit/Pabco Apartments Site Plan Approval 2514 - 2520 NE 9th Place Renton, WA 98055 Dear: Mr. Butrim: The Community Development Department has formally accepted the above referenced application. It has been routed for preliminary departmental review and is tentatively scheduled for consideration by the Technical Advisory Committee on January 27, 1990. If you have any questions regarding the scheduling of this project, please contact Lenora Blauman, Project Manager, at 235-2550. Sincerely, Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator cc: Donald and Loraine Custer 2451 SW 172nd Street Seattle, WA 98166 DKE/mr 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2550 wnc1 e0e-oe•10 i OF Re- N el TICE 09grfO SEPS0,0 OF PENDING SITE PLAN APPLICATION D E S C R I P T 1 O N •• cUSTER APARTMENTS IT/PABCO ECF; SA-001-90 Applicant seeks site plan approval for a 10-unit multi-family development on two contiguous parcels, the western parcel with R- 2 zoning and the eastern parcel with R-3 zoning. Density levels on each site do not exceed zoning ordinance standards. GENERAL LOCATION AND/OR ADDRESS: 2514-2520 N.E. 9th Street • PUBLIC APPROVALS REQUIRED : • Environmental"Review Site Plan Approval Building Permit PUBLIC COMMENTS WILL BE RECEIVED BY THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT .ANYTIME PRIOR TO PUBLIC HEARINGS AND DURING PUBLIC HEARINGS. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CALL THE CITY OF RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT 235-2550 'THIS NOTICE NOT TO BE REMOVED _ WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION •• CERTIFICATION r'lr So,vP.1-a , HEREBY •CERTIFY THAT 3 / COPIES . THE ABOVE DOCUMENT WERE POSTED 'B.Y ME IN I ' 3 CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON OR. NEARBY 'THE DESCRIBED PROPERTY' .ON I- 10 • n ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a ' Notary Public, in and for the State of Washington. ( ' residing inr•.AJ-1-e)/L) , on the jd O day of J lgg0 ,SIGNED:G N:E D,: �G • OF RFC O z Nici -rucE 09A CO. O �Q 9�rE0 SEPl0O OF PENDING SITE PLAN APPLIcATION DESCRIPTION • CUSTER• APARTMENTS IT/PABCO ECF; SA-001-90 Applicant seeks site plan approval for a 10-unit multi-family development on two contiguous parcels, the western parcel with R- 2 zoning and the eastern parcel with R-3 zoning. Density levels on each site do not exceed zoning ordinance standards. GENERAL LOCATION AND/OR ADDRESS: 2514-2520 N.E. 9th Street • PUBLIC APPROVALS REQUIRED : Environmental Review Site Plan Approval Building Permit PUBLIC COMMENTS WILL BE RECEIVED BY THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT .ANYTIME PRIOR TO PUBLIC HEARINGS AND DURING PUBLIC HEARINGS. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CALL THE CITY OF RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT 235-2550 THIS NOTICE NOT TO BE REMOVED WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION. I ( NOTICE OF PENDING\SITE PLAN APPROVAL RENTON, WASHINGTON A Site Plan Application has been filed and accepted with the Current Planning Division of the Community Development Department. The following briefly describes the application and the necessary Public Approvals. , DESCRIPTION: CUSTER 10-UNIT/PABCO APARTMENTS - ECF; SA-001-90 Applicant seeks site plan approval for a 10-unit multi- - family development on two contiguous parcels, the western parcel with R-2 zoning and the eastern- parcel with R-3, zoning. Density levels on each site do not exceed zoning , ordinance standards. GENERAL LOCATION: , - - - 2514-2520 N.E. 9th Street • Renton, WA 98055 . PUBLIC APPROVALS: Environmental Review Site Plan,Approval ' Building Permit The application can be reviewed in the Current Planning Division located on the third floor of Renton City Hall. Comments will be accepted anytime prior to Public Hearings, during Public-Hearings, or prior to an administrative site plan approval. For further information on the application or dates of final action by the City, please contact the Community Development Department, Current Planning Division at 235-2550. cH U(ZcN ' p-I 1 ' . tai 0 ; -3I ' • C7 j2-2. \- -./ ►R-3 7 Q:R-i �; W IRS,may,• _ • `SC'Ar Q Q �: SET. P L.A1 G.. -1 4i raT - - '.1-. *# -----,) • M d � 13-I t� 1. .�; _. hi R-1 R I , . �G� � � id 3.-1 ! > 4 . rn Q z t1 R3 � iI 1 R-1 R-1 R-I • I x S. 2 II f-1• . 9TH S�� 'I 4 ----------- ,� 4 I ; 1 l , i G_ 1 1 GENEP,C_ rnrorLrtAnoN- -- ------ - - - - - -- - — — - - - ---- --- -- - - - - - - - - - -- - P!•r.,4- /. 'z$n1; .� IY I T I >- 1 • a. '3, a q), C IPnD u55 DIeT<'FT R 1 S'IG - '� 1 O _1- I I L�/M�6N K� `_I_,_1_ _______ PNONyeke 9.4 55 TTrPL IL/ /N,II^L Cet.1,-( t 6 TOTNL 10.0 ro.a vas. I 4 • Nw11P0£ lam-h f•w 6 TIftOTmller. g_np, 4'nN II-17M1 r_ If,orlNIIS 2 4 4 ©1 � . u)Ilr eI E 000 -� 7e =- aL W NY,P 1600 ✓IW '4Y0 - r • -----------------t (paililliG cvwsi --- g 1 1 , , e+IPlej) e I 1 .lr -.4..s.D a4 , . /h1T 13 0 Iqe,I' 19. ® , �N¢jlr IJ 7/• :-A/ 0: _ I 6%IST i0 LN1r AIT. I - £� I rv�o'q[m(5m) 15 �'$i -.- --1 i E.1rc F. .Ce14F �E..rn - ✓.eT.y,>u9'Tos'(rv0) 1 o L_C_-�_J L gz e�c:< ' • o%uN.fIY rUal , I ;i sr truce i e110M_-trL0I - -� royk.4e / r --- 'a 14.00® . w v. rE • eEi10JeD , I I ) .. I __ -. . I I •i ~ 1 L - I '\ 11NLi f �- •, r \ . \\ '- :'C,,' . 0 r ,' 4 p .,n 4T1a r g i-- --7 wae.lt ( wloAT`3' ;// / 7.0 C00a{.N Y D[ST eFG I0 , � 9 s U to LLN1T Orr , 1 (.14ro uD) RN GA�illw 7''''''' <, 'Y . 43 3 rol� \/�-50` _ _ torr�io ) • _3"c `sl 1 .ii L G4+ee I ,, ��( {•�®T bW C.N.E' I , I——---I I i F F '/A � 1 ., i� ,O ��-'c �,�/� / f/ • 0 y, 8' I ' I J 1 r---I _ \ . -, , S •- o Ir*Vg�� • L l hon., o.u,n.I cn cc ®, '''-- I I I 1 1 I 'nt MEM in n �j r��-.w�.+�.�'�a ..-�i� MN 2 O Q) IF L L. „_ —L I I 1 < 61M Pt. .� .P.lailial=t L �� I I[ 1 br P ', [.Ice• END or Ncvl ocwr R-'' e R N E 9TN 9T, �+ v `- I - - - uoo eMTw i Pw+NG�i¢.I. a Ovr0.- e'e�� TI➢6�-o rn+rex nr�A . III M.¢•rr¢P1..(5e.a0 rw) ` `` I� I _ _ _ _ _ -_ _ - __—._ - - euir scw�J2-�_ `` VICINITY MAP HOfT1 - II I'9iC' I t axtT.on I\ I IE/+r PC. IJ �- I I LeuAl. 06o4R�Vn1NI I I I -_1 \\ v mecca. r 15.05 r+Ie N.to.of Tile e.no'w nre 5 rr.of Nat.w ce-Nfc , SITE PLAN Norm NW V.O.-Me 4N•II.1 W Nw-V1 OP 9e0 S Tr 245 e.55.w.M 1r IIO 55.5,00 WOOSI.Lao,4.u'iu..,N+•lBD»UrrOEcsNTviRm[LKDe4 woe. c.c I.60z4,No.e0O1L1055I • 55/5i b-Tx.r lP",•.11 OP Tire...,q O'TNC Mww - 7EN UNIT Art CS3M^'EX -- OPTr¢6W.VI Tlrw MW VA or...,ee.-9 94.2>U Le C.W.M.IN kIM'j 41 wMlf. ..6x ED Are 0O'H.0Ns: .......5.155 •��~ De410.1 N. A.0'60 b'M.or rll¢5E.WL+EC C/1N0 b 1-5IMI0N, . d•r'0.IL-BY ""'e N.5.5%Er'0E'IO W.e5.05,-too INTCFO¢GT A UN6 DO0WO rw ' ' W.TIAM0•T5'CN6MUaab AT RJ4W5£M41-E Ma0N 0Mrw.0M.a0nrc C. a rE rLp.N,VICI N I TV PLAI.' I/O- 0FS.10 5V5PIV11.4;TN6uce 5.AW1 nO.+MN11eL.NNE wo47,. TO-F4 -- 155W-5E.54..00',MO+e0as94+oro1Nr De41rrv11.5,;1ES5TMF510 I :.W K 06100/m P TH6 Cm OF e5a11155.co.om won K.L ke[(>D 1.0,0OO51105.61. . yY () '. ci i' 1 OF REN TOTN FILE NO(S): r0 �9O ♦ is ♦ BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENTmu MASTER APPLICATION NOTE TO APPLICANT: Since this is a comprehensive application form, only those items related to your specific type of application(s) ore to be completed. (Please print or type. Attoch additional sheets if necessary.) APPLICANT 1 I - TYPE OF APPLICATION NAME PABCO FEES ADDRESS Cl REZONE*(FROM TO ) ED P . O. Box 6986 SPECIAL PERMIT* CITY ZIP 1=7TEMPORARY PERMIT* Bellevue, WA. 9 8 0 0 8—0 9 8 6 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT* TELEPHONE Di SITE PLAN APPROVAL f'$.O (206) 641-1325 . EJ SPECIAL PERMIT FOR GRADE AND FILL No. of Cubic Yards: Q VARIANCE* CONTACT PERSON From Section: • NAME I * Justification Required Paul A. Butr'im • ADDRESS ' SUBDIVISIONS: I 171 cA N F. ' I-h S'-YPPi- ID SHORT PLAT -?TY ZIP C] TENTATIVE PLAT --• Bellevue, WA. 98008 EDPRELIMINARY PLAT TELEPHONE Q FINAL PLAT (206) 641-1325 [] WAIVER (Justification Required) OWNER NO. OF LOTS: NAME PLAT NAME: Donald. W. & Loraine T . Custer ADDRESS PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: .2451 S.W. 172nd Street L PRELIMINARY CITY ZIP • FINAL , Seattle, WA. . 98166 P.U.D. NAME: TELEPHONE (2 0 6) 2 4 4-4 9 4 9 [] Residential Q Industrial QCommercial Q Mixed LOCATION MOBILE HOME PARKS: , PROPERTY ADDRESS ED 2 514-2 5 2 0 N.E.. 9th Place TENTATIVE EXISTING USE PRESENT ZONING PRELIMINARY FINAL Vacant R-2, R-3 PROPOSED USE PARK NAME: Multi—Family Residential NUMBER OF SPACES: 10 Units ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE /52,®0 . SQ. FT. ACRES AREA: 27, 515 . 63 �/'�����C/�Q��'��� TOTAL FEES �O�r co r) CITY OFRENTOIVSTAFF USE ONLY -- ADMINI STRATIVE PROCESSING DATE STAMP APPLICATION RECEIVED BY: DEC 2 7 1989 APPLICATION DETERMINED TO BE: ill1=L;k1VIED ® Accepted Incomplete Notification Sent On By: (Initials) DATE ROUTED ADDITIONAL MATERIAL RECEIVED BY: APPLICATION DETERMINED TO BE: ED Accepted • • ED Incomplete Notification Sent On By: (Initials) ROUTED TO: n Building C Design Eng. Q F• ire D P• arks / Q Police C Policy',Dev. CD T• raffic Eng. • . ED U• tilities Legal description of property (If more space is required, attach a separate sheet). 1 • See Attached Sheet • • • • 1• AFFIDAVIT • I.; Paul A. Butrim • , being duly sworn, declare that I am ®authorized representative to act for the property owner,[]owner of the property involved • ini this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. •• SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS c-Pfo4A- DAY . OF Od-tv-be", t i 19j . NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR THE STATE OF •i WASHINGTON,� RESIDING AT t7 LLE. . ame of Notary Pubi c) (Signature of Owner) // ' /4vt - AdAly Gt 17159 N. E . 5th Street (Address) / (Address) • Eellevue, tr.A. 9800.8 (City) " (State). (Zip) tit , • • (206) 641-1325• - . (Telephone) , Acceptance of this application and required filing fee does not constitute a complete application. Plans and other materials required to constitute a complete application are listed in the "Application Procedure." • Form #1174 4 TEN UNIT APARTMENT COMPLEX LEGAL DESCRIPTION PARCEL "A" W. 75 ' OF THE N. 160 ' OF THE S. 190 ' OF THE E. 1/2 OF N.W. 1/4 OF THE N.W. 1/4 OF THE S.W. 1/4 OF THE N.W. 1/4 OF SEC 9 T. S . 23N R.5E. W.M. IN KING CO. WASHINGTON LESS S . 10 ' CONVEYED TO CITY OF RENTON RECORDED UNDER K.C. RECORD NO. 8005270551. PARCEL "B" THAT PORTION OF THE N.W. 1/4 OF THE N.W. 1/.4 OF ;THE S.W. 1/4 OF THE N.W. 1/4 OF SEC 9 T. S . 23 N R.5E. W.M. IN KING CO. WASHINGTON DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT 30 ' N. OF THE S.E. CORNER OF SAID SUB-DIVISION; THENCE N. 0 DEGREES 13 ' 50" W. ALONG THE E. LINE OF SAID SUB-DIVISION 180.67 ' ; THENCE S. 89 DEGREES 58 ' . 10" W. 85 .88 ' ,TO INTERSECT A LINE DRAWN PARALLEL WITH AND 75' E . MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLE FROM THE W. LINE OF THE E. 1/2 OF SAID SUBDIVISION; THENCE S. ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE 180 . 67 ' ; THENCE E . 86 .08 ' , MORE OR LESS TO POINT OF BEGINNING; LESS THE S . 10 ' AS CONVEYED TO THE CITY OF RENTON RECORDED UNDER K.C. RECORD NO. 8005270551 . TEN UNIT APARTMENT COMPLEX LEGAL DESCRIPTION PARCEL "A" W. 75 ' OF THE N. 160 ' OF THE S. 190' OF THE E . 1/2 OF N.W. 1/4 OF THE N.W. 1/4 OF THE S .W. 1/4 OF THE N.W. 1/4 OF SEC 9 T. S . 23N R.5E. W.M. IN KING CO. WASHINGTON LESS S . 10 ' CONVEYED TO CITY OF RENTON RECORDED UNDER K.C. RECORD NO. 8005270551 . PARCEL "B" THAT PORTION OF THE N.W. 1/4 OF THE N.W. 1/4 OF THE S.W. 1/4 OF THE N.W. 1/4 OF SEC 9 T. S . 23 N R.5E. W.M. IN KING CO. WASHINGTON DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS : BEGINNING AT A POINT 30 ' N. OF THE S.E. CORNER OF SAID SUB-DIVISION; THENCE N. 0 DEGREES 13 ' 50" W. ALONG THE E. LINE OF SAID SUB-DIVISION 180 .67 ' ; THENCE S . 89 DEGREES 58 ' 10" W. 85 . 88 ' TO INTERSECT A LINE DRAWN PARALLEL WITH AND 75 ' E . MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLE FROM THE W. LINE OF THE E . 1/2 OF SAID SUBDIVISION; THENCE S . ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE 180 . 67 ' ; THENCE E . 86 . 08 ' , MORE OR LESS TO POINT OF BEGINNING; LESS THE S . 10 ' AS CONVEYED TO THE CITY OF RENTON RECORDED UNDER K. C. RECORD NO. 8005270551 . PLANNING DIVISION CaY OF RENTON DEC 2 7 1989 PABCO APPLICATION 10 Unit Apartment Complex 2514-2520 N. E. 9th Place Renton, Washington PROJECT NARRATIVE The proposal consists of a 10-Unit Apartment Complex in- three buildings on a . 63 acre site. The property is zoned R-3 (Medium Density Multi-Family) and R-2 (Low Density Milti-Family) . Buildings will be two stories on the R-3 portion and one story on the R-2 portion. Access to the site will be from a single curb cut on N. E . 9th Place which will be improved with curb, gutter and sidewalk along the site frontage. Eighteen (18) parking spaces, located mostly at the back of the site and not visible from the street, will be provided. Particular care has been taken to site the buildings to provide maximum livability and privacy while minimizing impact on adjacent properties. The unit floor plans have been designed so living area views are angled 45 degrees to create greater visual distances. Each unit will have a private patio or lani and laundry facilities and an outdoor children' s play area are included in the common areas for resident' s use. Two large fir trees and a large maple currently on the site will be saved. Construction is proposed to begin in March., 1990 . All units should be ready for occupancy in 1990 . PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF REIV'I.ON DEC 2 7 1999 RECEIVED JF RA, 4 . � ECF: I 00I—_,0 z City of Renton „iL 4 0 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST •9. SE PI Purpose of Checklist: The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43,21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for allproposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. Instructions for Applicants: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply." Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and . landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impacts. Use of Checklist for Nonproject Proposals: (Please Type or Print Legibly) Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D). For nonproject actions (actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs), the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Not Applicable 2. Name of applicant: PABCO 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact.person: PABCO Contact Person: P. O. Box 6986 Paul A. Butrim, Owner 's Agent Bellevue,e WA. 98008-0986 4. Date checklist prepared: October 18 , 1989 5. Agency requesting checklist: Planning Division, City of Renton 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Construction on the project is proposed to begin in March, 1990 . Because the project is relatively small (10 units in three buildings) , the work is scheduled to be completed in one phase. All units should be ready for wowtopancy 1in 1990 . NM DIVIS CITY OF RENTON DEC 2 7 1989 RECEIVE® 7. ,Do you have any plans for future additions, expansions, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? if yes, explain. !' ,No. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. ,The applicant is not aware of any environmental information that ,has been prepared or that may be requested during the approval ,process . However, a landscape plan is prepared that will show existing trees that are to be retained. 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. There are no pending applications or other proposals that will directly affect the property covered by this proposal. 10. List any governmental approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. City of Renton: - Site Plan Approval - Environmental Review Committee - Building Permit 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. The proposal consists of an 11-unit apartment complex in 3 , buildings on a .63 acre site. The property is zoned R-3 (Medium Density Multi-Family) .and R-2 (Low Density Multi- ,'Family) . Buildings will be 2 stories on= the,,R=.3 portion -and one • 'story. sin. the.:R-2: porti.on.,, 18. parking spaces will be pro- • ; vided. Approximately 33% of the site will be in landscaped or natural open space . Access to the site will be from a single curb cut on N. E. 9th Place. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topography map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate • maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. General Location: The site is: located in Section 9 Township 23 N, Range 5E on the North side of N. E . 9th Place. The western boundary is approximately 132 feet East of Edmonds Avenue N. E . . The site averages 150 ' deep. The Cortina Apartments are adjacent to the North and the Frederick .1 Apartments are adjacent to the East. (See attached legal description. ) B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. EARTH a. General description of the site (circle one); flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other Flat to ge. tly sloping toward the Southwest . ,b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? 11% slope. c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, caly, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. Per Soil Conservation Service, the general soil type consists of Ragnar fine sandy loam and Indianola loamy fine sand in about equal parts. ,d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. None known. Extensive residential development has taken place in immediate vicinity of this site. • - 2 - • 4 e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. Some site grading will be required to realign contours to establish suitable. grades for private drives, parking and buildings . Cut/fill will be balanced on site, requiring no importation of fill material. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. Temporary localized erosion due. to grading and removal of upper soil levels and existing vegetation could occur. Once project is completed and pervious areas are landscaped, there should be no further occurence of erosion. (See H, below. ) g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? Buildings = 200 Paved areas = 40% Total = 60% h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: The potential for erosion will be reduced during construction by a temporary sedimentation and erosion control plan which may include: hay bales, fabric filter fence, sedimentation pond & interceptor ditches. Permanent storm water facilities will be built. 2. AIR a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Temporary exhaust emissions from construction equipment and dust from grading and cutting and clearing of trees and brush from buildable areas would result. b. Are there any off-site sources of emission? Vehicular traffic generated from this development will slightly increase CO and HC to existing off-site vehicular emissions, but no violation of air quality standards is anticipated. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: - Limit clearing and grading until construction is about to begin. - Keep all dust generation areas wet. • - Encourage transit use as a substitute for private - Car pooling. vehicles . 3. WATER - Units will be built without fireplaces . a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. None Known. 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. Not Applicable. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. None. - 3 - • 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals•'or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximately quantities if known. No. 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. No . 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No. b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and appaoximately quantities if known. No. 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals . . .; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be.served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. No waste material will be discharged into the ground. c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. Storms water will be retained on site and metered into a new 12" C .M.P . storm water sewer line installed in N. E . 9th Place which will be connected to an existing -- storm drainage manhole located at the intersection of Edmonds Avenue N. E. and N. E. 9th Place. 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally ;( describe. There could be a temporary increased potential for turbidity of storm water during construction, but it is highly unlikely that any waste materials would enter ground or surface waters during construction or after the development is completed. - 4 - ;r d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: - Implementation of a sedimentation and erosion control plan during construction. - Clear and grade only those areas necessary for immediate construction. - Landscape or, seed exposed soils as soon as possible. Construct permanent run-off collection and detention systems for storm water and any uncovered ground water. • 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: • deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other kit evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other o. Shrubs • grass o crop or grain o Wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other o water plants: water lily, eel grass, milfoil, other 6a other types of vegetation brush b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Approximately 65% of the site will be cleared of existing vegetation to accommodate the proposed buildings and paved areas . Additional, existing vegetation will be removed, but will be substituted with .landscaping . Many o the existing large c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. trees will b None known. retained. • • d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: In addition -to the preservation of the existing larger firs and cedars, a landscaping plan, as attached with this application, has been prepared to substitute landscaping, where possible, for removed existing vegetation. 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: Birds: Hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other A variety of common birds . Mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other Rodents and other small animals. Fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other None. b. List any threatened or endangered species known to,be on or near the site. None known. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. • This •site is not part of a migration route . • • - 5 - r, d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: Selective preservation of existing large trees and new landscaping substituted for any exising vegetation re- moved would preserve some wildlife habitats . However, , the proposal would convert undeveloped vegetated land to residential use which will cause an incremental reduction to total wildlife populations . 6. Energy and Natural Resources �a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. It is anticipated that electricity will be the sole energy source to meet the completed project's heating needs . ' I b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. • No. • C. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: Construction of buildings will comply with local building ;l codes . 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. Construction will comply with applicable codes . An extremely low risk of any environmental health hazards will occur as a result of this proposal. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. The usual fire, police, and ambulance services, typical to all communitites, will be required. There should be no need for additional manpower to support this project due to its relatively small size. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: During construction, keep all dust generation areas damp;, limit clearing and grading until construction is about to begin, cleared brush and trees will be hauled off site rather than burned on site. . After construction is completed, reduce vehicular exhaust emissions by encouraging transit use or carpooling. The b. Noise The units will not be built with fireplaces . 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? Not known. - 6 - t 2) What types and levals of noise would be creates-Dy or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis- (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Temporary noise levels during construction hours (from 8 : 00 a.m. oto. 5: 00 p .m. ) may reach levels of 85 to 95 DBL. Also a slight increase in noise levels from automobile traffic (construction workers driving to and from the site) would occur. Long term low level noise would be generated from daily vehicular traffic to and from the 1.Q-unit apartment complex, particularly during peak a.m.. and p.m. rush hour traffic. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: Construction noise impacts could be reduced by limiting work between the hours of 8: 00 a.m. and 5 : 00 p.m. 8. Land and Shoreline Use • a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Site -- undeveloped. • Property on north side -- Cortina Apartments - 20 units Property on ' south side -- Residential Property on east side -- Frederick Apartments - 10 units Property on west side -- Small rental cottage and large • vegetable garden b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. No. • • c. Describe any structures on the site. Existing two-car garage currently used for storage. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? Existing two-car garage. e. What is the.current zoning classification of the site? R-3 (Medium Density - Multiple Family) - Eastern portion. R-2 (Low Density - Multiple Family) - Western portion. f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Multi-family. g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? N/A h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. , No . i. Approximately.how many people would reside or work in the completed project? lD units x 2. 1 persons/unit = 21 people j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None. k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: N/A - 7 - � I 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: This 10-unit apartment project wi•11 be an equal or higher quality development than existing multi- ' _ family projects located immediately north and east of the site . The parking for this proposal will be located adjacent to 9. Housing existing parking for the existing apartment complex north of the site and will not be visible from the street. Large trees to be a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate Preserves whether high, middle, or low-income housing. and new 10. two-bedroom apartment units will be provided in landscap- ng three. buildings . Units.' will: be middle income housing. fen and b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate fences whether high, middle, or low-income housing. wi 11 None. adequate] screen c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: activity None. Use is compatible and appropriate with from types of uses developed adjacent to, or in the adjacent vicinity of, the site. .. stret. 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed. Height - 26 feet. Materials-Wd::F,bs.siding, composition roofs . b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? There are no views in the immediate vicinity that would be altered or obstructed with this proposal. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: Apartment buildings will be constructed of low maintenance materials . Existing large trees will be preserved, where possible, and new landscaping substituted for existing vegetation removed in pervious areas . 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? Vehicle headlights and lighting within the development during hours of darkness and reflection of sunlight off vehicles in open parking lots will produce light and glare. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No. Light or glare from parking lots and vehicles will be localized to one area of the site and facing an existing parking lot on adjacent property to the north and proposed buildings to the south on-site. Fencing and landscaping will further help mitigate potential light and glare . c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: - Landscaping. - Preservation of existing trees, where possible. - Fencing as necessary. - Location of project' s parking lot on back site of project so that its visibility is minimized. - 8 - i2. Recreation A, a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? The closest informal recreation opportunity the playground north of McKnight Jr. High on Edmonds Avenue N. E. at N. E. 14th approximately 2 mile north. Gene Coulon Beach Park, an excellent facility on the shores of Lake Washington, is 1.2 miles west. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: Residents of the project would use existing park and other recreational facilities in the area. Because of the limited size of the project (10. units) , recreational facilities proposed for this project«will include only a children's play area. 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. No. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, • scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: None are necessary. 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. Access to the site will be from N. E. 9th Place, approximately 200 ' • east of the intersection with Edmonds Avenue N. E. b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximately distance to the nearest transit stop? No. Metro provides an evening and morning commuter route between Seattle and Renton located n N.E. Sunset 1 d and hourly buservice isavailable on N.E. bu Set Blvd. a E. /th St. B t r�a it so _s _are c. How many parking spaces woul the completed project nave. iow many- would the project eliminate? mate ly o Completed project - 18! parking spaces . mile from Parking spaces eliminated by the project - None. the site . d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). Curbs, gutters and'.sidewalks will be installed ,on site frontage on N. E. 9th Place. On site improvements will include parking and driveway and will be. privately maintained. - 9 - • 4, e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or ' air transportation? If so, generally describe. No. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. 6 .6 Average trips/day x 10. units = 66 trips/day. Time of peak volumes would occur at a.m. and p.m. work day rush hours. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: Residents of the proposed project should be encouraged to use public transit or. carpool. The nearest Park-N-Ride is located at Edmonds Avenue N. E. and N. E . 16th Street approximately 2 mile driving distance to the north on the way to Interstate 405, Renton and other employment centers . 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. The project, by itself, will have a minimal impact on public services . The cumulative effect of growing development of all kinds is an increase in the demand for public services . b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. No particular measures are contemplated to reduce or control direct impacts on public services . 16. Utilities a. Circle utilities currentl available site: alectricity-) natural gas, . wate� efuse service. lephone,unitary sewer septic system, other. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Water - City of Renton Power - Puget Sound Power and Light , Sewer - City of Renton Telephone - Pacific N .W. Bell Refuse Service - Rainier Disposal Co. Storm Sewer - City of General construction activities would be required to Renton tie into existing utilities already close to the site . C. SIGNATURE Disturbing of existing in-ground improvements will, thus, be minimized. I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willf isrepresentation or illful lack of full disclosure on my part. Proponent: ,4//,` Name Printed: Paul A. Butrim • - 10 - $17A 11-R-R4 • °; • D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (This sheet should only be used for actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs. Do not use this sheet for project actions.) Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms. 1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous sutstances; or production of noise? Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life? Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are: 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: f• ` ,,,.�. . .. - 11 - 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public -- services and utilities? Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Proponent: Name Printed: - 12 - November 17, 1989 TO: FILE FROM: Lenora Blauman SUBJECT: Butrim/PABCO I met with Mr. Butrim and property owner, Don Custer, to discuss the proposed 11-unit residential complex. I shared staff concerns regarding too high density, limits on view corridors, need for additional distance from neighboring multi-family uses, need for improved/relocated residential amenities and parking. Mr. Custer and Mr. Butrim were not receptive to the specific changes proposed by staff. They were, however, amenable to making some changes to residential density by eliminating one of the townhouse units and increasing outdoor play areas; they will look at other changes, as well, with an eye toward achieving goals set by the City. They would like to retain building orientation, which is away from neighboring homes. They also point out differences in topography, which serve, in part, to mitigate proximity of those units. New application materials will be submitted in the near future. FINING DIVISION CfTY OF R NTON DEC 2 7 1989 Gyu'Zc4l -ZO &} rr APT---, P-I R_i 77'1 1 lTi TEN UJJ\-1. APT R-3 lil 0 ;A 3 _Z. \ \.,,/ W R-2 ;R-3 L N , co-H FL- _ % P-3 0 � R�' `�1 I \ . lu R-1 R-1 c1, RcL w Z z 7 L ce R-I A R-3 -0-1 Y Z ti 4,. 1N1 E 9-i-i-t s PLANNING DIVISION } CITY OF gEITCON DEC � �9 i 89 / VICIN Irl MAP NoRT1-1 6 - zoo i TEN UN I T Fl PT: COM?LF)< . A8C0 PI oZecT e fit. i % �;ip 7 - • vF 5 a tSIA-ID o - . Thl. -• -' r 0,,,, O00 �AAt -b 24 44 i i p4 p M'Ec.l D akS 1 2 1 G-15 :.i co.05 ______"___.-------> r r( , � R C II f S' i=R f f ,• 0 \ C ` I \,, ) vo O O , r ' � Y.7" Sc►,tteR41 . f C � W I u)Gotta ' i f ( ` O six ) 1 t 0 nO d• I 1 K_________ ____) S'017117 ')0&7'. I 1 iNAMIg? : PLANNING DIMS ar ev CITY OF F1ENTON DEC 2 71 T u >{ � ecEIVE® \ PplI Ic) ot, ,- icy tt'= 20 ' P sL i -vti, Co e- 1 - l 32: . .. . . . . ' • •• • .-..'..1-,.s.t•'.:,..'...',....• ,.:.,..•'i•.&':.,:g..:'•,•': ' • - '-•.-•' .-, - . ;;• ; ' ..-2: , -,,•••'k•. -'`)i.;:,':df.":.,,•..:: !.:i'l.':':';i4.-'•'?.... . .'.1•:',•••'...i:,•-C,', . .. ''.. .,,. ,•i:.....*.;.-. .•:'..i?.. .-•?:,:X:,:..;:',•.•:..';:'.,,!,•,...;;;;;';4.1...::...,;• •. • ...•, ••- .•:,;,--.,.,..,',.',:.:,..::.',:........,,:. ;„?..,..•...:..',..-,:-.. ....;,,,,..... &•,4.,(:,,,i,-„4., :,..';'''..i'i P•V•i'lk,",'!‘ 0••4,:-...'••••'•• %°'• ''''• •' ••''14''''' .4' ';'..‘"1•1"' ''' •":''''••'•'' •'•••••3•1•4'''''• • •• .. ' ' •• •••.•;.:t•-'7.,•••. ,,.-• :•• "'•••'••••••:•• .' "i'''•;,•.'7. ,•.•'1'.'..:•:',,••:•l':•'••....,'•....•. 94,A•k: ,••'t. .•• .‘i•i,,IY,..1 :74.c.,•.;',,4:•..1•1 ,'•:1•'ti•!...3•..:';q:•:".,•:1.i$‘`'•:.':•,•••,: .,.f.'-'•.':••:,'•.•;;:',i; .. '•••••0•..r.l, .;••";.••••:•'••PIV•-.i,i,.i.,,'4Vii2,.,;:''• • '': •, , '.•';':• ••1;''''..011'i ''''•:..•!'•':: '''. ' t.•'..‘;:•.•'1••:-1,'i. "•' :'''';7•••/;.••is.'•li.41.D.:1/Z.f‘i;.••'I.";;;•:C.'ifq••;'i... .?;;;4:k;-.7j.7r•;•-•;,•'::)....:•1.:,'•3.41,111i...,. • ,....,,• •.',";••!c•..!.!r;!, ',:•,iiP••:1);•.!:',.:.%:,:,,'"fi:•;,‘.,'••••.:".,:;,••,••7...•ii•:•44.;••..;,..:•:.,• • ,':..' .'•:.•• .•:.•.1 H.';•.1.}.ei-;;;...:-.;'''•, .,',"•;:,;,'',,.,.':': .;.•-•.:••••••,,:,1[4••.•;':''',,•;1•":, :•,:•• ,,•.' .444,•!;::.:,t1, ,:i44 •.'•!,ik.';'•it,...g....,1,...;q:.:..:'.!,`,.'':,,;•7',.'i...i;,,il .‘,.,•• .,'..' ".,,,,' ' ,•,.';,‘..,..',i ..,:•!;;:.':.•:•;.:.,.. .:!.',..'....1.:'.„•:.:.',:',....k.',,tf,4:',.••••,....:- - .• ' ..:• ,.. :::',. ..,..i-:.'.;,"..:.:,., ..'.'...:,,.;,::, •,-:;:t:,....•;::,•.,.-•'.L.:7'...':.::.•:::o.f:::::,. '...,°.kA..!'. .•• ' i.','".:' ,`,1. ).'.'i::__L:`...i.s'.4,',&,,,'`... , .•;.+,'`.'..,••••••••i•'•:•: •I ,•:;,:''.:'...1j., , :i.. . .-,:..;‘,•,;:••'111....?.;::1',•''11';';'1,:,',..i',..;;;:, •• • , .. • ....'•.. ..: : 1,-,,•••.',• -..c,?, ,..:,';';.,. :,. '. :.•, , .:;',.-,,........;•,....5 ...::•,...7•';VI,C;•••.:::',.•,...,:::t• ••.,',!•••,,,,,,,...,'"0,•::1,p,.. ;, . 341 C ' • ' '', . "' - •• •'''. •::::*1 .• ••'•• - .....i';'i'•-•;".•' ' , •:.;•t• ••-,'''%, ,:"..,'.‘•::;•';'.',..,..c:',':•"'i's1•:.:sq.'•••::;.?..1..'-•,.;•1•:;:,'".;i'.•''':-'.;!',...:'!-;!7,&:•- • :; . • .; ••.;'•-••,-%,:-;';'L...4:,?'•'''i' . •'' 'i:•-:: ,•:.-.. ;,,•.'''•••:'• DUPL.ICATE 'RECEIF'T DUPLICATE RECEIPT•,- '- ::;'•,-,,!'.-.;(r...,:i,;"-:;, •''',.....;:•. .4'...i...',.,'" --•-r-:====::::=:=•-•===•=:7:..: ....... ----- - - '.'•''. ''!',C.;fi'-..''.•,:.r.'.. Y,';'.!'''.;:l..!';'%.:?".,,'''''F''.',.':;-'.''-'-.',''';•''17.j,::).1%3..,f.-:'.;.C, • . ' CITY OF RENTON -,,• - ,,!,,'J'''.,.' •(.. s'...:';;.':'-',....';'3••-;1‘•-:•"'f,',1.4:;''r,•.'•::i ..,':•.1 .i../:.r.':,i./:?.r;s• •••••••‘• • . •.I.• .:..."/,',, itf.',:',7.•,.. ..:. :.'.•::.',.....,',J1..,- ..,:. .• . . . . ..i1,..- ,.:‘.,-..;:::' ...•••,.. "..::',.•.,P;,.,tiv...,, i"...::;-!.,.:':-:..;:'-'.1;V:0'......•,: .. - ... . -.•.'. .::.''R-'",,,;;::,.-" • %;.:., .. '-1.,:!-.'1.• - CITY TREASURER , • .....:'• .:;i•:':. ',.. ?.:.••:•;;; •'•.•:':'2-';;&:::'''';','• ':...,,•,',..,:.::...P1'.41J'..;:. -• •••••••• •.' • , ' . \ '•,:...•::.z.,I,:-...,',..,..,.... ,-.:„...,..4:..+,..,.,4.,:4;-......,. ':.-:, •;:. - : • ,.`',..:.,: . •:.:...;'',...':•'',!•,..'' 11)-27-1989 1:52 PM '' . :i••;:•., 7--1,•',. ;;,::::--:!;t..:.:,:*:1•;'..7:::1:-,.;:•,''':t",:..,.;:-.'*-4,:::,,7:g,:i . ','' : : . • ..,..-',,'.---•' ' :•'2.•-•, :;....'-'•:"..''-• . ''...'' •• -.'''.•''.: :.'."-.1:: ..'' ''V:.:':',:•••••••'. li•:::',..:'?! ..ii,,.-V,':g.:•::' ., • • - :'..... ' :•.-;•.....'03;::.ii?•:,..''.'..;:'•'.:!.':'•;'-.:.';',.1....•.• EG/RCPT : 1)2.-0252 ;...• , ;:!..%.;:•'‘' ,•',•,..7.,•Y;;•;;,...!:!.:•, ..-2"-,.• .. .-,'..,,.......‘.',).:5'.',D'ir:',•,' , ' ' • : '...''''''.:. ?;...i'.: •"...: :''3:,;;.,•.:.•':0.,:'i." CASHIER ID: 11 . . === AMOUNT ==:= •,,,,, •;.........,....i.,..;-,...;•%:','.'"1,:',f::•.'..':.' ...0'.'• ':'-,i.'•.'',1,','...10;..','L•. .'I' ..4., .I.:.;-'..' ...•il'-;,-C.Y', •••:-;•.Y' ').".''''.`..;1'," t•,J.:);•iii''*,.,',';'.'.. •-• • ' • '; '.:45,;11?; "‘;':' 'i''.:;?..!,'',',.'''''..ii,Y.'.! 1 7057 UNKNOWN ACUOUNT $8213.00 , :':!;;:: :`.1).(..A.'.,....,..:.'", ;......1,';'''yr ,??,;•.! •,...',`....,-;^.:•,'i,jfil '. •• ' '.:..,: ,4.;P .... •' ..:,,.:•••,.., .,•- •.:.i',...., SITE F'1.AN APF'ROVAL. ••'... •./.:..,..:!...•.1....,,,..,?.....57,',,-,2,;. ,,..,•:•,,,,.,.• c•i ; ' ';.,:.•.,•!..,,r,,,••••••,, ,, .. :, r•••• '-';' :,-''..c',.•.....•••• ..'••••••••'::.......'.:•.'2,;',•: •••;.4 '•f_:.-;:':,...•4 t••,•i•,‘4. ' .... • ' • • .'•.•":iPS,Itil;•• :.'•',••. •,..:••••:••,i i ,• '::::,1'''''.:.S.:',:•:'' 999.999.99.9.99.99.99.999999 „,,: ..‘„,.„,,,... ;. ;.. ...:'.:-.'.-, •- •t,.:':.:'•-.-.l=..'eti.,."'9.:,'f;':4';,/4i,g.':..,.,:.•',:...':'.i.:%':-,.......''.,'.!i:l.,;-.:..,.H:`C'H,.•,:,1'",,..;;'.'A'..',,..s:.,.,,'i,.:,-.',i..;., 705 7. UNKNOWN ACCO U NT . $82.00 .•-• .,.;.!:i;,' .,''•...:2..:,•.'..,I.':.• 41. ENVIONHENIAL REVIEW ! , t,....r.•1v.;,:,,'..,...:,c..,.,,.;;'.,,• .,.•:.'‘999999.99999.99..99.999999 ,.;,'.':,':••'..•'.:k..•,.•;-`i,....-,.:,T,,;;1,-:,''.1,,;K;_N..,.,:.•--,':,.'.'.,•, •..• . ' . :::•,.::: .: ,.•..,,,.:..;,.,;:,•.,;.,....,,....,...'...•.;''....1...!..!.... .1. :,10.r'...,..:..• • . :•'.:. '•''--. ...::.-•,.-'..-••.,.'-,..,'.-,..,''-..•:-.i..:.,'::;,',,-A'•:'•.-f;,1:•.:a,r-',.;',:..7'fF1.;'.:."c•:.:`:.;iw''...,1t,..t.,•.;A..:?:!.,ki,':'i:'l'".'..•.•.•'.:.'•...2:'',..s',..'..,..,.:.'.:-.,`.-''.::.:',:'••..!.';.;....,.•T',,.'-;':.:•.:.',.'.,,..,.',......•,''.'.:••:''.'•—•-.;:..:.'•:-.A.''.I....,..'/,;.'''f.;'.;•:..:?,",:,•.z:•.,,:.'i;'.•7;,:.;,•.;•',1:N:...?,,:;•,.'!-.•:.•>•.;,.:.'',•.:',: - . • R •- ,. , . _ •• . •::,,'.,•,.,k,'..,.:,',;,,:'...,,:..';:,••. •„.:•...;•".,.•.•..•.:,,..:..-,.;'1•,';;,.;'"'':,.'..-•:,:',•::„`_•'!•..:i...;.;..•.':-•.':'...-•.•.••' . _ . :-X "• !. „...'...,;,'„•.,;.!'..:.,.••. .:'•'.,,,.;,.:;:..';;?„.'i;,‘.'!,.'.•,.1;•'?./V:.2:,4.i',.'.4,:?.''•et-''.•.'.,:,!.':-:,,''..:,'::..?..':•.:•/:-,......i::..::'.;:......:,,:.,:•c';;'.•,:',..-'.'•.!1s..:..;':-.,.,.,...::''.'c,.'::,,t..."....y.'.'',••r.,I.:i.,..:!.:''•...-.,.•,...„.:'T.;•!.:•'j';•".,.,•,:•1:.m.;:t,;,:%•;,g;;;'•..:•':!' ;4if.A..irf,Nqi',.,-t•..•,....:.,,:....., :•,..,'•-:,',:.ToTAL DUE $90100 i 'iP . •• RECEIVED FROM ' '-' ........'0 . - . PAUL BUTIN CHECK $902 •• ..,.'.-•.,'•..:..••.•• •..'• .:,„''sc:',0,,-.. ,• ,•'...... ' •. '.•'.',Z,';'.‘44..'.f..:-.• •••. ''.'::::',.:;•••:;-.f...::':.;::,i . -- --- ....... ...,...•:•,,,...,•..,,... . ...,:•.•_•:... ,I,i,,,,,;:;;•;;,:;..•?i. ,..7'.•:•..,:,%.P'1':.r?....-,t,:;.Vit:,-':'•. .: ,':•.•.....•'' :•.,.,..,•. ;.;.;:.fr.7:;,‘...':,',.....Tf'...'...',',44':4 0';f:::::;.-1,::;.c ,:.:.i.7.":::'Yi'.!,•;;',-tk4:::):: i. ;:'.''. --' '''" :.'. . •-•-'.4.".'•141,i„'•:;.'- ;.'•.-:''i.:'?:';';t',-',-1.4ki;:•:',.."... TOTAL TENDERED ' $902.00 '''Y':'••••-',1•:: ',.;.;`''' ••'.. ;: ..''....:'.'`.;:,Y••:;;•`','.'••••• •......'• .:1:-....le:F!:f. • ----' - ... . ,..,••,.;':.`,... ,::::::i•; .,•••,;',..k:-..;.‘'.*:.•,:"....,.....;;;,.i, g';';'.i.'''.. • ' •• . .-.',.0..."..,;?: 7., ..•.I.'..!*,:• .':'::;..'#.:','. CI IANGE DUE $13.1)1) •, ,:..., :.: :.;•,•;•'.•;....•.-,S.,,I.P.1: ".;'...;•:, .r-'+',;'.....,:',,t .'i'S:t;.•,:eb', . . • • ...- I"•".4'.."•:1,.•;. -,,•.,..::••.'::: ,;;. •.' . • : . .t:41•••;';-•-•• ,4'.ti '!:',t.,!, i.:,./..:, `• ' ' . .'.q.:1'. '.''.. • " ..:::,.!...t.-,.:‘,!, .:,:' :,,,::."..:.:',Ii:„.::':y..'.. =..========_____....,====.=========....=== 1..'• '• ,-,./L •• . ‘...V;.'..:,,r1,:;,•,,, '.• ..•.:"..-,...',1,:',;;,111.,.! ', ' • :-.;$'',':',i'''.. '-‘,.. •' '..'-'....•.....'.. .i...i''.' DUPLICATE RECEIPT DUPLICATE RECE IF'T .,. •,,... ,••' .••: ••,;••;;•.!,.:...,%.....i..,,,,•',....,-!,)".., ..‘,,-.;.,•'',f4: :1•1..'. •-, . . . .7 ..T.•..i:' ..;,,I?'?;';•:::.;..,.i,';'..::.:,:.1.: .. i,!::.....1.;;'0•,;... ,;•i.'.Ix..,,:.:.,,,,-.::.'„,,•,%•:•,•,)?.:;,;.:'. .. ...•, • . ,, ',.. 1%.- ••r'!;;;"•;'• '.1.•••.*•••, t..I..,•:'• ..'• •.7,;',,.. :,...i ...:,..;,.',.'.',.•-•:.••,,,,,,,•,.,.i.:..,,,,...-..;:,..,•••';.., ;,.-.;7.,,,I.:,,.,;.:...,,-• ... .t,, . '" ' " •".,,i,',..},7r.,;':,'••••.•',' :•;.‘....:,2 ••‘.';',"••} ': . , . ,,•.?),;:-•::.....";•;'.,'.41"..):;i'i....':' - ' • • : . .-.'‘;•*•';'8,1•***„:-...^:.:.:-,t'.;.i:*-:, ..:,.:..'::: :'.',::''' : . • 1.-..,:, :'.,",%:;,--•:',1 -- 11 '•:••(•:;•.; :,.1,:/,'...--,;'..',:4,;;:i-41f).!;,- - . :•• '• tt-•,? :., ;-+::' ....:; i`1.i.;:;•;4:•;:l.:';‘, ..''''.f:`,?*•';'''';; ;;.ii:i':.,';':.!•:. •,4.:i.V.i't;::: ::.;' • ::::::1174. :.':,-',1 ;,-:;!,:::,'.`.,:..; ...:•:'-.16 :;‘:'., . • ,,• -',.,:,,;44.,,;:t i,...,',....;:. .. .,;',.;:.....:•. '%:.•..,.;?,i.i.:-, . '''',': •:;,,:,:: , . -•.r.i:;‘'t:; '..:,i...;,,,,!.:4..,':,•,..:j?...!,.....:..„,: ..:.z.1::.,.R4.,•:;:y,..1•.:-`,,-,,.•.:i.:,!..,..„::.•.i'',c,1 ki..-,:,; ;••.-.‘;'3 -?:;•....:„'....:',..:,`II,.,:i.A..s,.'....,.;::: .. • ....,,'.. .,..,;*./.:;g0,...;', '..;..:x.c.,'ic',.- . '!•',..'... ..;...s:t. ` . ...,::.:',4,..,...,%...:::•.z,Li ,,...:(.1)v... 1. ;,.. ':),":;-;:::.:,....:'::: ii.-:,-•:-:,...i:...P.:6...... ..,?!...•.f.....-..,::.,-::::31114,:c.i.,A. . • .....',,..":',',:*.14-i.,:,'1::.'•., ...:•.'•::...;.",!.....7..si'lx,/,:'i'.4...,,f:i.:.,-,..i•:,;:',5,-,:,..,...:','..-:, ..;,...:','-)..;,.!!",?.....,'.'...,,''i5:; ::',.;:i;::,'1:::'':',1'.;1.:::::.,kik*:Y.•••;N.'1,:...i.'. ....;'.i•`•,:',,;'•f•:At.*,':*:•';'•F:L. .:;....:•••:',::.'&4;.4..f.,f....; •'...'..: ... i'..,-...?,`,",.. .t.i:i'1.:.••••••.':'6'.-•,,..:,„'',..'.,-i '::',',-.'.:,',',,•;...:',....1 ;':",;;:s4:::••.-••••&.'s.,4t1,•••,tv..):'•,•i',..11,,i .`•:,..';';'•;ct.i.',"...•••••.1$C.,..;'..Yi.g0V.''''.1,..1.- '0,,"'• •-•:f•P,•-•i;••:!..:".;.::,:i•:-•..',..:•,:;,.1,', •.7.''...',..: •....-;!....,; .,1",i',!•14'Y.••'.' '•• •: ' • .' '. • '''•".,,-:',/..-,14".',.-•.;'. ,, ;- ,.., ..,,,.....1.•;:o••,•'',.--F,,.'i.... •!,',-,-...ii.-••'.'''':•:::-.'i 4,1 :.••••,..!,•-•-..,!,-.,-....-1).-`",.,;,...":.,...:•';',.",",%,.,.. .",..0..,..........„ '•;.,•..,,',,..i".-,•,.• -..5,..,;.7;,...;,:.)-;•,...,::v:•!,:;,;;•:,,••••;;f; '2:::•',:::•;:t•tvA'. ', '., -•••',•••' ;•:•._;:.,t"!;',e'f..e ...':••'•:1.:. ••••;.;•'''•••,:•••••••,11::::::;;).;;;;‘',:14•.;:•;;•••••!",•••:•;;...'.1i,.,•:,•;1•!,;.-..'''b;L•1:;:•IX.,,s;•4,41•q?J'.•;'i,•.:;,•••••••F';''.;: •••:..,•:Y:1 : ,••••:•,,:•;;,..! !j.rf„t ;;!•,1, ';',':,•-•:'•).,'i.,:i .'.../;••••,:•;'' ...,r:'...i. ./c,'F•11,..Z!';. ,•1• .;:••.;. , .,i1,•4: :••;•- ,•'.. .• . •, ;,:,:,:,,,t,':zy.•;;•!', :;,:,-;;,i..;•„!.::,•.,,,.%,i,,:,Vt;:.,7,•••••••,;:•',„';'.••••,...•.•4,,.._;74,••••,....A.1.0;:,,6••,‘,..:,` •i•.•;,:•.,".••••.j-,•••:-.:;',..; •:.•:;:,:•;r•414, ...;:,• -'•;,'•':)•••''••"."-'.!'"••iskY;4•t4'-' 1•'.••'''.“ '•••••';' g'''••• -•'•••, • •,• '''•••• '':.;.•.•,.;"••,:;•;:',i '....••••;";: '.'1•,!:••i 2 :••°•.•;;FIr;E'•';';-'k! ; :..*:':,;.::•F.-)• .•':•.''i;51470.';',31-':•••••••-.1,•.;•••••••;•'••-••••• ....;',...,1S.:;;.•.;'•°!;".:';'i.Y.•••,:••Vi.,.. ',1,•,•'. •• •;•',...-..ri-j"..:•:!•%.•,/,:"...4.:,`;,.*;4•;;f..,.:1;: .•;,',•:.•:,t•F...;';''... ,;•,4;':::,: ;;:•;;',•,•: : '•• • : • , '• • ,'•;i3,:••,,,b;;•Iht,1;,':I/ •':•::::,Ci.''•::,- "3,...,:;‘,1-•;;',......•!',U,•!•••,...,•;•••••:••••?:'',;);;ii. ,::,i.,..1.:'"'`.,;'•''..S i•,'•'•.,,..,.:-'•..i.'-,.:'.':''''.•:•..•.'..•.,:.,,.•'..7,'..0,;.1-.'.'.%4...i.,',.fkA,,A.5?'-:C'71:..;4:-.:,:.;•'.'':•;'•',':..i•'.4r;;'.''/;::::.!;,s:•..,::;.:'.;-.',.:'.•'..,:....::..'.f.,,,."i.,'',,$.;:..':,::-,'..,...,.:!''.'•.:'":''.,•.;'.,-•':...,:*,•:••,:;:;;:.:':.'..-'.:'•••..,:,,•',.•.!,';::::.',.•:---'....•;.-;.'.r!:••",:,'1.;;;•.....'.:j.1;:,..!'.-1i,..;0.ii74•...i.!4:S-•.;..;,'..,1!.:,..'.;.::...••...*•1.,:.....1.".-.'„1..:,';:.4-';'.,‘..,J;'.:..;.:•:::.•.fi:'l:h••;.:.,':,-......!;::•:•••:::•‘•':••.,;••',:•.,-2.;..'.::••;:y,!.•'::'r;.::.'..•.Y;:.:.i..,.'•..,:f,;-,.f7ii::."-,:.':.;;,.'-‘..':;.;':'2.1•':.•,.!••Y:s:‘;''-:.'''.;-'.,.'.....;:•:),k..'.,•.,.:1.'...2..?.•..•7[•!1•:.Ai4,,ir. .1•1ietI i.V'•.4'.'1,,,.":'•7:-';:;;;.,-,v1.........,?1;:i,','i,;,,.:..!•.7:1•.:•i:•;„.:,;:,';,':.,,.:.f,:.‘4:.:•/,'!,.:•;:.4:':•,;4;g:..'?:P.3:(.:r,.;;-.a+.01.;..J,),;::):..'=.‘.7;,:.,.:••::i:•:.:,.:.:{.,1i..;,:%•s:::.,':'::t.:;;••',1.:•7..:;.:;:;;7•,•':.,::,.'1••',:;.?,.i:-4:,.:':•.1:,•:'.r•!::•31I:;2''.,,•;.;!i.•.;..,:'::.-,,;',;..!-•_:'•,:.:.•*.;'•'.::",•../,.-:.;:;'•::..-..:;:..•.".'-..:..1:.;k:%•:li(..,.Ji•is.i.;..:,:;,,.;7;ec'.......',',t.,':l':1'2V.;,:,i:'.:,k.•;,...:•,/:•'.,•..•'..:•••:.:.•',::-••,A;•,.•.2;..•,.C•,;i•:.zi.;f?;...:1.3,:'..;.,..‘:,:•'.0•?,;‘,••g%4.,;•.-;!;.1;::T.f'.B'''I•.A,1.I'..'•'11'-1.I:•.;.:,cp4';::'..„1;•!,'.'.b;...''':'•,.•.;•.•'•••D•-......:-..4:i'::.0:;•-'.•'4$.'...;.:;:,';A;,.;-:;7:';':•:;%.',..;.::,.;'.;•'..,"...;..."..'..:4;::f.,::•;;‘.r'••;,:'..''•..;&2•1,!415::::'•.7.!:.•:,.•:;•,'i•:.:A!:''-•4:;':?•;••'':;.,;"!:'•:.‘2:!.;.:-..%,:•.-;..P'.;'2I".'.':1,••',I'1,'i•4:••J'A.+'.!.-).:::;.•:•:';:•-':•.`:•"••-‘•'-:•"s;•:'•;.:'','-•';--;.'••:.'••'',‘•.i..,,':i.-..,..J,;1'-:...i.;'.:'.1.;•,;'::-.;•..::•..2.;!.::l":.''F:..:;::C:.C',,.:‘-;.'.;;..-.;'.''::::2...'.:•:k;T/•.i,•;-j:/!:f.4...4:...T't.",1S;i.:••i.;.it:.:.•...C•'';'A:'-t•:i'.NI';i...7'fii..l3tg;tl::V,i':il,r1i.;:.:'.-:"•,:'.4..-!'°::.::,:..,.:,.:•'.."..••.'....':.'...','.,:•;'•.'.•'. , ,'; : ' : ,•,;1 .•::• :, ;; . .. t . ..N::: ;! !41;, .. -•';. ; ' t1;4P:' f •: ;'; .;? , 4 : ; : •' 4f4, ": ; ; ,,\'. ,; . t4ngio" ; N; :; ;; i141, . ; F97CP ; , ' V' ;7 109 Y I ,•':.-.,:r-'.••..•'.. ..•. .....:. •. •.. • it i ::.'.. .::::•.4:•,-..C.,•:'?..:..:::,,,':.!::".•:',.-:.:...',-'...\':.',:i:',....;". •:;.::;;.'.::•'•,.'.,•;;•ii-,:•',:;•.1.....1'-'..., 1.;';.!:',..'...,::,;';.,'').W .,';.., ',1,.-;.:';'::',:f,'-i.::".. .....V;:::',A 1 1.'.',''...:2-,,.,j.f.?.;L:'•'':... ..:.i• ..1. . .. .;',i.k:,`,;.:':', i'f'..........'''.:••!:.4.Wi'''';:*••••': ' ' '.. • . ',:: ';','.....tX.,,,;.:..1.....•,..c:,'1,-::•';'.1.::!.....,.'.,'.',..:::',..2,1:,.. •.;..i-._:.; ..' .'"..:.:!.-..,Y.,.;:...•..-..:....(ts.i.1,f ..1.....:t::::''4:.1. ;. .., ,:...'".:,.4. ,;'' • L g•silL IN.•:•,-.. ....,.....,..i,..,':• ,.,....,....5- ., ..-•,‘..f?•,41••;.,, '''• ':::'*.i..10,,l'i,':::::':. ::::::::':...... ''.•':t.,•)::;..: .:?:',..!lt,'.....-.-,•-•1 '; :..., .'",... 1,1..i .1,..i.P.,;-:•;'-i.:..,,.:.,,":!..,.,..,.•,,:)".,..'•;:::..„ ..;:,....,..,,‘,:,...,j•:,•, '!;:,;:•.:,..::•..!...:,,,.:•.:,...,,,..-.,...•••:;'.:,:;,;:,,),!,•:,).::.;::;-,:.....',..,..t.,,:•i.:'. ,ti':•:. '.'-• .::. A)'4!;::',:.•:;.1.-..' •••;..-.".'•;4":,,,;.;:: 'S.:;:•;•fic:':-;.:'1,::•„‘.::-..:`-',1,:.'"•-...,,,,t.0;;I;.••i.k•4;;,;','n.P;'...'..i;•'•,.,...,.1'::':-2.• :.- Z;-;.'.-; -...;!e?!."i:Iiitl• •;•',..'.'•-[;'.-'•'...:!!•;',•-...;:;::'.... '..-...%::::::.:f1:•,.•::...:„.'.'i•:;',•,..','--'''';: ...ic',54,:f•i'.. -.;.•'::,14.11'::•CY•.::;-,!:-;::•::::'/: ••‘,'.:;.•!',fr,•'•, .),.'•:-':,:i..: ::'..,•'•• •:',.;;14 10:i:.:•:;•i.1.•:':,•:,;'...,, ?.,:A.:...':.'.;..,'I'•:,,:'17, '-:',4'.;,•••••;':',.''t, i.'"•.;,7. ,4.- ,:':- .--';',..,•26:;:j.,•.:'. .,.•: ,.,-1 ...,•f;•;,......./.(::;:..:.;:-.....,..y.1;-'..):1;..-....' . . ....: ,,,,,,?1,,,..„.,.,,, ,,...r.•,...,:k,:.;;:,..0,,..,,, ;-...._.,;..i.ii,cr..:-,!,,:.•.,...•I•:.••4.. .!',, •.••2.,'i„,,,oz ...,r'f l',„•••..-i', v.s..),•-•.',....:.• •i''..',. .,,,i;:.. ...!:::,•:,.'',.;,‘- ;;.;•,.. ...:.',/,;•" ..., ,','•••,.i.:..-.;‘:.../.1‘4:•'.'.-,''.,',..••• • ',', .-",';•il,'i.,%':. • . :• ;'..• -I.'::41,VC.1.4.1...-;.::','•'..•f•,,:`••••:•.-.•;';• •".•?,i';'••••••••'il''' "...,f;:',. ."...4.C,•,:•'..:.::•‘••'.••.•• '.,..:4'.C.1",',..&,.-.1X %.,:•.. 1,,...!.:...........;,•,:,..,:;)::,, '!,,..:•:,....;:,,•,..:!..,.. ,r.r.• ',-'.',.2.'s.: ',., 'z•!•:,::.:';'!:......,;'.,!;•4••••• •;,":f,.'.f'..:',1• '-'•.4.,;:,'A'r'''.. , .''..' ':,...:: ::-,:i.q.:;e4J,.:1:s'i'2':' ';‘'.'.:s..:::!':".:-.•'',:".".,. ':'•:.• '%;‘,".'..::-'1... :?;•••.•?..1.•.•'. •''',... .., ..:•";,ts,:1:11:;•i..','.1i..•:;.;'1:-.';'::.'1'.; .'..i":-•.*:;:•:;. ..".1tiA 1.S',,..1••••,.,;,.;•:;.,..1,"-•,.•-...:.:,•2;',‘:/;,•.:./:;,••, : ,, ...,-,, ,...,,..:,...'-:,••3i. _. -...•-''.•-i ,...•;•!..,"'•'":. 1..:•;:••''.....-''''...!'1.. ...,'.t•,/,;.•.k',.•', .........,",;•••!,'i'• .. ..-'••,••_'.. ,:-,.':.:•••••••••••••:-"“:,r.'?;.:1•ri • ••":•.'.:.,..„...'.... ;•••:,,...'...., •,-.:.r. :••'•-.,' •:....'..:'-'4,-.t.ii:;',':',:.Y:•••• ).••• "..J.,'-',•';',....'‘..", ....i., •.•- .1A:4•, •••ii•'..0 ' •::••-:••' '.'-•' '•s:•••-••''''."4. ''!••••%:•-.'''. '`.:•••'•' ..;',;,''•':-.!'..'.1.'''.-.'::1:•.:•i-,''',.*•.'f...; ' .',‘..--•-•.e";,... .fA'-..'•'. .'.•/.41.'\..'-', • ,••:- ,.. ;kC;:.••".•;.•...: :.• 1 .."..:'::::••••' '...."4",-!::'?4'.:•.......,•'.e.,4:••':' ,•:-..:(• ••• ',•••,;!•`";''''f...:...:1';•:'•';2.-1,14 •-•, ..':,::5:-...:•'i....•..."'•::•;'':'..:.-r;...4•• ••,::::••••.:4;'',,......';:".f:i•if;1.".:'446-....'' ' 1 : • ••: ...:•••,11',.:••Ni'.:::,`,..:',';' ....s'."....:f.;•!;•:.;;';,;;; •••:•!,,.`,":„..:,,•'......:2).:%.,.;,.1'......•.'•t",-",..,, )11. ;,:i.?,.;,... : ',..,-,i,'..,1r:.,. ::....1.-,•:.,s.••,•:,!...,.•;;."....!';::;-;:, ,!;"!,),•,-.%,.',.";.:... .:.;.;r.,:-•;'.:,, ,":.,-.'.. 1.4.-.Ti .,•••;::..;;•.";•..Y.•,,,,' -(....d,Wit:,:!•'. • .,.. ....4 4...,,,.. „...;r....;..,,.,.,;,;f,,,,...: ,....; ••.ss t•,,,..•i!i .:.(s•g:•;fli...,: 4•';;;;1.;;•:... .•:-!•,..':13.•••• :'•..'''i ,Vitt, .:•.*: :.4;.'i•;',..:fi:,•--!..;;.' :.!*::•!:-'..i'V'il:•-•',T.:,•-•':'-. -:.'-'-'.1-.::r•i•-°3:-.'",.31! '-';•-1 l'I.:.•..:::,'--'.:::!•':?1.4 ::;*..‘7:L ::::;•:';:•;•..;;., ::::::•,i;•: ':•: - ..- ':...:1.•: • •''1••:,1..:‘,.'... '‘j•:.:... '.:.• !.:e;}......':•.'• • : :' • ,.. L': ,. ....:.,: .:1:i:.;',::. . '11.:: ',. .1,' . :.....:.,;....:. .',...:1.:' ,',':'t',...;•,,,P.F,.;;;,.•':•„;',•;•:.t(....;je ii:f '•::',l. ..:..•.".".'...:.....'-,'.:.,:,...•,',.•::•J:..,.,:,"Y.'...,:.:"..,.:,:':.:„.:..:,:;:..-.‘'.:.1",.,,,1. 4 ,..,....,F1,.?.1,tvlt,,.,:,::i').":::.';.,,'...':''..'-J•;.:::..:'..:....:'•,',..•:,,:.,i:•,.,:.':.':.'.'...:.:.;.'-:..51 4. „.,-.,.-,;::..•,'.".,.,..:.''4 1 ;.':i...;..:...,;t:•:,::•:.::',.. :', I::T1k,i.:,'F'::),•:'../.,.-,.`;::..;•:',,.:.:..i.!,s;,.'..,.,...,..:y....:,.,.,..,'....;:;..,.,.?..i': i..,.,.y';.:.;..:•,.1:...;.,!.:.,;....';.......,.1::r:.V;.,.•-,,;-.,":;.,;.•.;:',.,.,:..'.......•,.,..N:.i.;:,,:',?.:,-'..;.:!.-!-:::.;,,...,,.-..:,,...,...!!.:i..,...;:...:..!.:..,'.'„.::.:'':: 4: ,..•.:.'.;...,:',.••:,,!::...!...••:"-.:..:,'4.-?.::•'!:::,..;.':,.;.‘.::?.,.;::,,,.:.:,:.:-,.1,,:.':.,..:„-•:..!i;..::.:.-,'.,i.....::...,.':...-:;.J::.-..:.•,.:,•'f..;..'k:,f:';',:';,!.;":.,',.:'.,•,:'..1'..,:.:.i::...:.:.,f,:::!„.,.',:,.••,....;';.:-...:...•.:,.;.,...i_.,:.:• 1 . : . „ , , ;, . i : , , ', ?k . g 'gi ) , 1 ; i ? 0' : ''1p,.':,,:,-..::.;:...',5:•:.,:-.:.....•...,J.:..,...-..•.:;..,,.......''.7.,...,.,,.•!:::.•%:',;..,':,.'.:'.,:.)1.,.,.,-..",1..,.:..:...,..',.k-,.':,...,,,....:.......:•',,..!.'..'.;''i•.'.'.'',:..•'•,';;.:•1..,•;::!l,•:1,444 44 I I ; ‘ I,c ' ;! . c' f ! t,'...1:1.A:•!•.,.'-t..i.5iatk1..fP.,,r,.'::..:..,n:r',;.;.',.....,.„''••',:..:.. '....:-. ..:.... •. .- • ••:.....,$4.1,....,.,..•,,-.•:•.,.'..•.,,..'..-•,....:!..;..,;,,,....,-•,i.........:•,..,, . ' .! •,.•...'..,.Y:ti.•,,,,..;•.......,...,•:.-...•..,...,,,., ,.•,. , li .:,-. .. ..r;.!";;; .;...,:u........ ,,,,..:,!;:-. • ,.• :•,. . ..;,„ ,:,,,,, , . -,.,."x",V,', ''' ''''';•'s...' '. . . •. :.•g:':,:',‘,:','.:'' .''.••• • ..--':`:' '. ... ..,,A1,17... ,, . :', ,- = CERTIFICATION OF NOTIFICATION OF ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS/SITE PLAN * * *FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY* * * PROJECT TITLE: cask#-- /!- (mil& & p)' APPLICANT: pp ,Q,j. 4 L �t }-\12_. Ci.-S-te rv- APPLICATION NUMBER: Si\ The following is a list of adjacent property owners and their addresses. A notification of the pending site plan application shall be sent to these individuals as prescribed by Renton City Code. Chapter 7 Section 38 of Title IV (Building Regulations) of Ordinance No. 1628 relating to site plan approval. ASSESSOR'S NAME ADDRESS PARCEL NUMBER L. L. Barger 198 Union Avenue N. E . 0420-03 Renton, WA. 98056 Henry C . Pedersen 923 Ferndale Circle N. E. 0425-08 Renton, WA. 98056 Reinholdt Reinick 2511 N. E . 9th Place 0475-07 Renton, WA. 98055 ZWP .Partnership P . 0. Box 15134 0530-00 Seattle, WA.. 98115 Beatrice M. & 960 Edmonds Avenue N.E. 9059-00 Ivan L, Nass Renton, WA. 98056 Shogo Kusumi 4643 138th Avenue S . E. 9158-00 Bellevue, WA. 98006 Wallace F . Nelson 968 Edmonds Avenue N. E. 9186-06 Renton, WA. 98055 PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF FIENTON DEC 2 7 1989 ASSESSOR'S NAME ADDRESS PARCEL NUMBER ASSESSOR'S NAME ADDRESS PARCEL NUMBER CERTIFICATION • I,/, jlf 1G,l/L//,hereby certify that the above list(s) of adjacent property owners and their addresses were taken from the records of the King County Assessor as prescribed by law. ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a Notary Public, in and for the State of Washington residing at Mountlake Terrace on the 27th day of October 198.9 S • SIGNED: My Commission expires 11/20/89 CERTIFICATION OF MAILING I, Sancraahereby cer if that notices of the public meeting on the subject site plan approval were mailed on 15 Jqo , to each listed adjacent property owner as prescribed by law. ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a Notary Public, in and for the State of Washington residing at (= k)T O e.) on the Stfl,, day o J,q tO q go Lei) g,►_n, n c ° � SIGNED: L. rev' FORM 208