Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLUA90-006 i IUII ' ir•J r �I ) _ i II �i I i!v" _-III- ,r— sd ��114- --- ---- `j1I cant Ian• . •L ; 74,1,..... �: ® 93i) it T _ Lilo 'yr� lit ko I IAI •zAt �J, Mill I I [ 21 III /W It11p 0 0 -I IL o II - d o ,,1� W 1 6 A 1 1 : ti , y 2 ti •I I 1� I I ae� T.t.Id Q p~ 0 2 I IIE, ,.: ,,1 0.62 At I I M•' ,, . . ', c. ....,--• 1 r)4.I/ L.. x •' JTL./SSv re.t°s I I h•f ' 1 �WeKt 043Ac.® ra■ Inol■1 So 110 0 / :79 36' /-sir./- L/NITED 4 C` 0.11Ac /27.77-1- yo— - - 5 II II I 0 n ,l /r•/19 let di. t .•• N ' %'.'•' '• irhdo ICI r i. ..•• L55— ,.[a 4✓ bus! ass --�^..uN' . �RpS% 9 •yleln a UT ..T........9O < ER // IM 1ED .r./4 '.. OV C ///• R r_ 2 commercial ; /�N� t J - if 80 UNI vacs •t land . Oa Q` 0 Qty. //�\ 1 O artmilir s .. ,��„W,� Pony�l J L0 ■ ■r man • pa p1 I • /a r- - -- 'r—� P o 5� 7� �s ; 7 56 UNITS bi SUNS F �� 18 a, Q � L�63 Ac /�vcn�S _ I P0�{ 5 of residence - iv �,lLAUR LE HEIGHTS 2 SC/ I SI O b Ines • II '' artments I o�ap ¢<`* b1 residence -�1 I ^T�9s0 // APCONDOMINIUM ` ' cil `' .r.r �`. 40_ J I A COt` - - Gad/o -` I 51 � ' su/,sLr .. -a, u ■ 11O--.lye-.r.� eJrt•-- - • »■ denoi I resider • (��V1�)! Ir_.---___.-,_-,_,_-_—_,.., H 11 r n• ��It 61Ac. [ ` residence - -- - I �Iper m�ht i >[ Ilz r7 I „n o r cs9 T lar, ? SSo I 02J ,, vacant land V I r■■i�( rr I?4,64 L. N,E. IOT H p� • • 1'9C \.• 15 , • 044Ac �Tr ,l •tet . q �, �j ti /• T.l _ o9B. ?/ - polo :'� 4ANATTA j JOHN L. ;H;� •b h ;y ; � ' JI� 1 ft r !demo , 'Cr, 1IO201 a !er V. n , .d, " o ll Tl./07 7' `�, ~ P:rF Vn g11057 NM' v/ �`�' vaoent land o (j] LIo At:. 1-^ Js is a ,► 14 $ I 6 o f f residence 'c'. vacant land Q �• 0 l t[.97 H�Z Q Ai uzs :;xl.: .7/ .17 u , . 7GJ.4.T tiII�� ._I�—. -3 S N.E. � /w1 , • I ooD �47 }� a.6 rr Izr m9 g0ra IdiOrflbl■ zc.77 -'�.. -- resides ----13 ---' I I �. / , :11.6:::14 3Ac.8 `? J ^' N ��' 6Q� oJ -- --- --- �! r ,t./ j Lod o.3sncozl �� ®' r • 1 P 73 rn ----- - residenoa �12 -'- --R-3 0 , N �OTH z�5. »sldanoa !~ �� " 1ft' )1 - - - -- ._.___._____r______cn_____�iL ff. ;�(v�al ar 3; vao■nt lend --- - - - ----- -n l. • 1I I' I ■p■rtment �� ^ N M , h Eit.` ^o ' N `^ • l(��co'7�1� 11 I ., l3 `` b (1/ l ,71RRre `1 sLF).J6 I rat en lal //le.o. ?now IS , , ,, ril • 5 ,_, N [7.,-, -, ,•• • , Q., -, ..,. .../ \.=-,-, ,--., 4, ...11,, Si 24 ii • '• - I _I' I 5.7 A ; -{ Tt./H v 6 ...t, --k.) .) izi 1 13,kali K- "-^ S ,i �. rem Pr .jc./0r t • reslc�anoll 9T H raelden A1 - - _•H �, residence ',4, • 51 ,I• rai c z Q. 111 o f 9 5t in 0 4°_ '448slden 0 9a AC. ' ill 2 rastdanc L J' -y ?19 ` 3 4 pc vacant land apartm.n _ _ H -' I ' 902 ®4rt d /: • , r rn7 • ran di •irl �• :er o r- .� /r•eeldenoe '~- 't °7 •2,1•, • .; •e..o[ w b r.c.ry / ,.sow s� /r ■1q�R� ., I op x21, 11 20 19 la[ It ... I n ttl vsoant (sn tJr".GF �F� ! !'1 = °° (�, y Qo _ y �• z V �° 37y J:l �rt'r�',j� ,s� J� N.E residence I g r �r ' ' c EPO • 1• sr • Z l/9 42 t5 J � 12 h �'6'� r c, t residence [�� a-•s .85: id. :)-• 1 • a . 14 ' s •" ;,,,, �? -' • sent land 4 21 r ..1;. nail ) r ��j 'T 24 �21 . _ a 1j71 M. 5 4 /. • • W % 1• 5;� • n Gl Y•asldanoa �i " gL 10 ] J 1012: og 8-j LJ ,i , E JI�, bl? [i e 1' : , l l PLra.id�nci nos y reside , I 9� U ^ • 1r !c I • �` Jy 16 's[J/ - ~F Id�no aF 1v': e �` 1L1 ��'`l+•` 1 ® 0 1` •L'a° Yaoant land ------I aI� g `� 'z' I o f .r ', • ` 1. • - . ' c u `I�,^ Y !';1 Z -771-r r Tn 1 A t 5V}'r 1 EA .. 3 ^ - • cant lane j 0 o- 2 7 '' ° 13 I ! • ~1� • /6Q 75 98 , n v II �l0 L.Au J* .. 41 1•asidenolItiy c •�i business Etil • • a N • D 7I • � � t , ST� w 4143 T` , l � ►ll 9 60 t. r � 61111. ' vaoan I dtr ire Id�n lad [ �� o a'� J raafdenolel ,itiC i 5 1 ''�` Wit.° tillb 7 .� .."a ' ' .►c. 2rJd7 —te�� �• i�5 zEl: • 1 ' ' 1 ---, W 0 7/ Jo o vacsond 6 , [a 6'' �� Qi (''', • b i. 01 north. r.. . bI �• , v9 , zb 25 • 4 , S ICI NIT •. . . • 2c:3 . • .. , , /4 - A t� .,ALE 1 — a p 1 ' ,<ID• `°S I2 /pC r �'��v ..LEGEND � sue J/➢,t ,I) iv-147_____Th\ ,qo11110? x-- - gavel driQI un . - fined 'edge 1') •' " �� . .con., curb qutt ..r \. , '� -,7 ['.._ \ II \ '.; ?; '' I Washinkton N wxe+.+r�msrIe-sivare oP � T ` !¢llama LF ,.3.1.14,1•461 - ^�G c cT014•21/ nWnw a II�g ''- +�e�.y�I� ft7G I q.tQl ldGY F. I W noNtee Fw661 .evwr- _ rd°vur wm c, 111 / _ ram,\/'1 I .../... �. R ,•J/ „"v'W +f51°°' _ 6w+�' Q ♦y.�"`"" �rP ( -� jF 4!iv ."�-1k f1tiLEK I' _ .AirgaZZENZ i ,. ' '5'It.fAti ran k 1 1 •1151TM Al...1 I I i 7 1-1 • il is. \VALE r a...R.If Per Irma le WI_M Jt f FIM1 Y LL'-*I o--O �r L,„kr V GI N r -Y u wo... I I W<Wii9rP y 1�° / �/ \ I / (—�J .1 t$s 1----�__6�— 1 thTl' I ( f _� _ Q ,,,, . „„„„„, ._..... it w=. „..,.. N1r V•j��'/' 1. ,1 C �. �•1 ✓ I J, _ _ \Yu� ` • /, I mlN :II y to urdT'S I\1\I Z X r(�„rf I �_ I 74, ..4.e 1` `o 1 U a an d , i. \ 1 2/1 \ �.. ill _ I1 7 i t icl W$N I G ��( � T I�TITITIT �, `� ' J i,� I- �3 W Vi Vl ,F7U' e.g —� I �— ! —= zn xn 2/z ' i'g �y O /• I • 2uw{e 64'.a A�1' t 116, a 3N,rs 2„ � 11 1 hUll ► �T.V,YwT(� a' i.F,•w/B,I,T �� O / . .113 V� ' {IIIG 1 1NI _ 2/2 \ i /y i •..i O 22 ---'\ r O ' Tzar L.or / - IIIII, 1 V ;�\�\I� �+' I 1a d„m� ' IIIII Z ; Zs 1 .+%Rea ' ¢Tw/ ■111111111� / LaNI� oP�,ol 1 - T _ 2 Nw BL'R (� -a I / _` N 69•Q7'58'\V� e37•'L[i' 4 • 1 _ 1 • ._ J ,0 F'R�LpAT1[NT P`CE'b OILY / \ J C YJhTNEI ASPHP3LT 7AV I NCB \-, PROJECT STATISTICS , Q] G I I` \ \ / SITE AREAS 2.6„ROES 1113,256 -) ri y _ & // LAWN E.�e°a��°a '�-d� s�3`�1E6 iu' LA\�/ e::.\2 a.. 1.Fdmd /(li EDAM.\:a.. •666 N.::1EAILxA TOT. 60 MITE • BUILDING LnNeo6:r3Od. BUILDING A 6,263 Oe 9P1a:32 ER'i: eldlhwti BUILDING B OROSE PIOOR AREA:10,407 SF = Iw.\1 BA. t PROJECT TEAM - a.\BUILDING C x sA All NO 'ir1111. 0 n3a_ LIMITED OEOee noon Rose'aa. a BF 2111114.32 SC 4yN..✓::I6-20 SUNSET eAoe•R8 NAO rod (11,a 0 OF - D.:a EA. \ • (1061 663-6669 AROa::ESE( CROSS FLOOR AREA: 4.1142 SF -1 aOEd.\3 e AVENUE R.E. PAREIN6t REM. GOES/a TELLS 1206)e6P-P653 °'"d PROVIDED: _ .(OPEN) : LAdO6OAPE AROaI:Ea. n�(O`(COVERED) O) LEGAL DESCRIPTION 310 DESIGN d _I mwIC.11T .L5(OPEN) F- • (ao61 365-6156 105 TOTAL g °.- i AVENUEIMPERVIOUS ADZ. BUILDINGS* d.s. AL ' .RECORDED IN VOLUME 34 OF PLATS,PAGE 36, SUITE TOT LOTS..D 10,HARRIES GARDEN RO.TR.'S CIVIL ENGINEER: DODDS ENGINEERS,INC. 91.1310, • 55-E.F.(693) RECORDS 0e EidO eo6x7T,FASNxdOrad. (2 iad 021 665-7677 OPEN Aea/we000APE 27,200 R.F.(sail • tr------ -J 2 • �` a '-') 195-) "/% - ems"AOf_ ;; • �! 91 / eBM .F �� , / �' • 11,,..nj i ww / 7 / 0h RE TfUGIt^Jz I YO 0 ,1� z / / .,fnr.1NWGm 36"F/4fcE fF�I.0 1 2"h'AfLE 6 rJaA� )i -Y NB9°00•'B"W SRO 90• OJA•`/<"E ROCr-ERY / t3�M.7, , vr--. \ IT - MAT t*. " —(si ce ' . in A... firj.1011VP.' `1 yyrk e I• .m §'N'6.1vnF,ES r E �'� �'._ * w.1*• -. • '' .B vas Od _1�� YYi� ri�� �i�I �anor +` �9 4 \ V. FF=174 C FF., 178 a UT-IMIV°"hM. Ilj 7E.t, • vo Rooc FF 456'—* . Y. �,1 OBI COO Ili ¢? a Z IL i� nuG w9 1 \ i r HOUSE ri '.. ryw �. NW,11 WATER s .... .. . \I ik\ 41,,L11161241114114L,k 4..u.:121111.9°' 0/9111*. c''I Itninti 1 1 1 Iffj-- • s° - 11_♦ �11�111110 WIP:411r.....,aak. ► m I 71" . .,: .,Atv ..,"c= tikt ,,, _ .,c. .16.0•0.00" i III= ,' "a .1 - — 4. IsaW *A 11---miiirani*Iti liii ,---- -.1- ' :oils, - ''' A!. 40 m 110 / 4.�� O ' R # • ! s s E F=183' a¢0 • III +.cE ♦ F �v,a( -' Z• �. I� a as � G�aPE 12. 11 _ _--r--- ' �� l I i Gm iBiliVfr ME ME . ME iMil A0 Ad �21 n. ... �1 !��TA*fsir:��•�� +=�.• � -'11111114111 - �q N N _��e ,q I E ;. R O C li • Z ,101./. . o. O. y; y'/rg''� FF 178ror Lor _ J,, 111 i 1 .. iil _ o k 0 rz�W�mK/2��_ +,r IIIII Ill P „ .vr" R :e.`e �°e Q� ~l • BEG/N 6'C 4A� • _ .,i� • 2 • '�_•i..uouTw� E7�_ Y/ • - - PPP^ .` ff /^� [' 'v-w-Pr r�11" MIR as all / AI 15'MXeEPY V ~Z Tl In // '� '` yq-� C 1 v ,N A roR59. OIXiH n '. i/P ,e r Lf/e<,vF �,Y2' --c /fE_.. - .!�a..-r ., EriZ v \ I / N ■ =/--,v-----— T r '- ��' _ J -•r( ..._.i"�"""--'•� J{�// o 1�.i W k Z I . r✓- - I _ - 6`flli•' _ s i .. s..�U ^ GAF ....- ` ' °• ,, Q 2 2 C7 c� AJ 5P//;C'T i caece o y \ I 0 e-oc../.wn --._ \PA V/NCB-{ A.Vi 2 s( D '� 1g_ I �-a7 -Ts,� '� L AWN - �'LAWN7r— LAW N-__��I %v sor �(7 W3 \2i d. 4. i o „•E W .eEcoe�Fv .��E'� /y ,m b k \ 1 .• _ AP Na is/l069C0u l J�P \ \ WW pO 1\ �� 8 44 cc 1 2 W y Q 15R BIXlr f Y/-L/NE 2 O /H.1B __ __— - - a 0 O,G `S1AU7 tY M NHCLE DAWN-7 W w W /E �m\ BN /"-20' � y % 9 EE • P2• 89/40 • • 7LA ri N6 E00 • GENERAL NOTES /AIY pp'fOtJlcAl. C.GMr't;hl `�I2E FF-r"AF1�S I0 IIIIU' �11j11 • FLA'(ANU`�AaGERI FOUR/LON(Y71.1 RAJ-C.2'c!- D}p ' -•'FVIE E. (1�{fRhG6P-IS TO PRO✓I VE <�-JBC, AOA `III IIIIII, rFt) '�GF¢I,IATTA ' rJP-MIV 2OA. 6�b 4'�6�0..1 PAvephuPF%CP�- .1 FL17T I• -I /'' pout",rJL�IRU-1 IYiuu.. �i}D agar Cr rwlas w - �' •i! i FiariT •AA"FFM-1. AtLL�i �TU�f n�E cnanlr+�l PY II�IIIIIIIIII II IIIIIIIIIII�III ��/{� NIMAl1.YAN DI .....0.1.....car I I�wu.^liq-n IllllW^ill01 I(1) LEPUf�FNYLLum JAPONI�H/ up, &lb ` Ea.�cae: •ToFGAIL y-L F{y5 A nlNlrlun l of 4' iN 4 r-ATN¢A TeEe I�`C uro•u+w+,.- t LAWN PJ'ID 6ED PEAS.PPGIFIL YoFr�tlh 3-WAY p E� I,, gyp, n /•' c ,....•:. µ�'} a rmc Iz EQUAL- 1111111111111111111 I tom;7$+ q�1, PINU7 ,41(�A/ We e,te, ,. zni'a M (mRw.-xl •ALL EED,MEAS( jRUB LC,PaNDIDVEF- To REGENE DESIGN 0 AIY10EItW PINE Ime.,„.,...(„...,...,.,..,,) c,xBoawaLL °'W''n�:*a�nn4 ns • A2 GEPn{6gof Z.AP•IYL I'IULµLFO{WFIrIE F�oUIlD FIP-OFt pill Yq�6 1®�II� PLEZU¢UtJA UU'1/VINE i'IAPLE 84o 641, 'h� z•.z'rw-vwcaly^�1 MA59 pLAryTI1VG OF SMHl16S OR GTiOUNpGpyFJ er.cor iftxAArvey�1muLU{ S ARE rpr PCLema.E• l01111I.11II��64 IU7 unrr NIUl TOG9LY k..LWYKL "°r r^*as.eaYNa H 0 CEx TaNee GeoWN 5r rraK `' L I A iu 320.112thSW e� Ku: 5 /�° �,�' Arr{w,e--�a,wv •R In°WIDE FINE r-eAY, P,euuD 67W P LLcuR Li.ERE B I UENLW FIX.ATLt1-�CrlOfo.SM' 7A r { i - �.r.>E:�. xruY,..n�r nrrNA4Nr Per -EUILDINUS AE up to e 6MlY,ALANs'conPAC. I u " v l—" e „C.�,,, n AReAS• Everett.WA. e I'�ANU-IIA A6tTFOL1UH/ 21K•" 10 r^1 5 `�"I en © PIEFAh J wNICA ., - _ .LL �li�� array-e.a......, •TRErh WlF ,6pE TO .. PeR 347-2954 LEANUSIUS�.ol-IA/ME & ��21^ 'IPA v, . - ( TN NE B �+rtn NG © 5rdll, AILS rOEE IS Z �. 745-8455 p USTus wee-ta7s/Aa.e RCC-E 2vaL. II 1.I II I I fit `„' i j I I IWI I I 5a^=� O® E4[A CA¢rlEq/N F.4T11EE 'GAL- n I,�41 ul, w- m.--¢rmreo II1 '^ �' ;i i'WI� "°' �r*�a��..YE ro¢-, • r'fA6S-PI,gN1lII'-�jC,OF SVV��RUBS).f�RQ111%, EP-S ARE To BE 1111 IIIIIIIIIIII11011101 —.•., AZALEA 7a'. IGAL• •^ _ I N LLEA 6t{ I'iTIIT PaTAIL F-OPi-i,rlC1 E` _ UI PER AE'RA '�..•J WA CA6NLA/HCk(NGr- IbAL IPl O.G. �I. �I'I III ti 'IIII �M EOUI1111G 1.TRIA,UL-B. . ,-,.- , AIVEN on 1 I L O lur li'I , � ' "Y RM1 tIG xryEw E. ... c�Paa+4cayEa'xvM{ OVA foGNE ISED`. ,�L,',.,,,g A!rROJTa+4Cw OVA OVA-COriklLnyfC✓- �'Po" 32"OL. 'W�-r'2iee j ua,Fe acme e«rn eew U., a 4' • FRL Ep-PLPJ'11S MALL(011 FOP4'1 TO 7F{E nIHIHUH DIMMZWI 67ArrDARU� FhTAeuSI{r:D aY Ane ICA,ly AIA11O 1 OF W Phr� e7fi. gNA{H, T F&fr; FQ a.80,, •o OTree Staking Detail Shrub Planting Detail �u z •<•.. ,_- nor rox.,e •THE LANOBCAPE•,Gr=ilyPER(L-N ,A PII1 L'R)etAL.N4 ' wn r..n*cen--,•,,r. o,z,Eve °o. OTIRG.p'FoR'fApPFo✓AL I G ES ¢ ,m, rP�.Ai a�tZlthAPIE SCRALTERrya1 TOT11Fs.E OPAW„yys• • V�N�AF-( AcrOF IS To nArHrwly THE L�{o J1WE 3 w I MUNI Fl AL APPpoJAL e.yowryER i/�'CQ -r-IIryC� I,- MUNICIP- ; g O • LANDSAPFi(.ornPa TOIz: 4U� LJARRAPIfY ALL FLAN- rIATeRIAL FOP-A PEP-G0 ofF-.u-IE YEAR won OATS of ACCEPTAN6e, CornrAert—rurbN•FP-Ali CA E-c,6Y ¢� MUSLIN-OUI-ATIL COriD OOIy O AND A PROPER r1AIr1TAIHEr-It PPcr,RAl-+,if -ICT L-aT AHC.I.LAIiD"a'AFE a_ Cq{TRPCToP.WILL rpr PL RPP�bt-r-N e'-E FOR pa-ociEs r'— CAuSED N VAN0Aosn oR 11IEpT. , d • \ �T r > F - pT9 w '� O O�7 O.� �.rp 0 O A gr. %.,:7&%.wi--•-•inr•�V:.r �712,U S .eiiC'_!7 Ciali t)r b e�..iwSv1�^.'....a. ......sia7�pi! rl'f 1GT\TH 4 o ►Ito c:oro O O O C.4 P ?► O~. .90� ti ♦I �._.ere�___�!er.rasa•1��t1,i .I=.I,:i%II• ,. ... *t` rc► >.P.,000 'cs •'000<�i!�.-�era�•�� ,�_ O�-���- - �? \ )c'� ;� i +yam ' e:�'''�+> �� �� : �;;� 410 �� �..ili 1.ell � Itla o..r. iiiiimiAtL.,),0,...;_..r..,,,,,,cr...,..._, ..,:cw,74.7;00_0 .1;AV,> ' 1*/ \ 011-41) 11!)$1 ill.A11!) it 71;0:0',' 1,!*4te't_ rovi,, 1.--. .... _ _____ 0..,.. .,, .,..1.„„ e. to _ .,.. itc,4,0,) -__ 1. I, agetlf::o 4 ..-..d.......*-S..i...S. i 1 (:fy..etZir •�' "r1T�' 61ZT° CP S ��• Opd c c ` i44" ul I k, , wE4,TC.vi� AGO *Pn ,,,„O O .. -O\w, L I4'1�! Pi / f. ,` -4 GAF oi,P ve'� o— .•O lir b4giw • kill III oI%�: I jam. at , 6v o cr _ y� .1.. ........_.•.' a%`v Ill �� • o 14:„ ii{I g - 14a b��o� o, :„"''1^'0 ';. P ,,i; (,; • 1, �,.np r% „`T rr ..o,.,....e..,,,,,,...: ,-.f III F y�� Oo !.i a' (15 a of of nl I jai o .. i o.o �a �. a /IeI D�- dri IIII �' r a • :V • • cA I OOp r e O rye. ioln t''''1 liP.0'^ �0\ • ' '1gitt -� 471:: • • Dp `a.� ��y. ,o • too P TarLo-r. rotio}®: Ora}i p► , d�t�i� Wr� I �� Bill �ef-4'4 �i,, -�^�.',.. q►Q� MN ion to •�:I Ike f'a�0 All ,J.r.�..� 0� Q - .S8 0 _ 'om.va �r oo njl ►�Vtii — �..�ri:. \ i o av v �+ oo.,�! v R o CSO'1i r t n s�oTo ov o poai�'c4 �� ► s��2:a .. /. Oo_Ii liar/ f,�y _ o_ids.. o, o ��I,.Op D000r ai� O;Ai 'I.. =6:'1 ���.'�I!iiiiO4.%_.� rD.o: ii � 4.r 0eoo s�1:eo00000 /.- .' o%�:rC Op ��`o p �= �... - NOP4l•-I - lllll,n,l'" ulllgl'III ��9JOB Ng . 1 SHEET Ng �J\ V/I II III, IIII•111,10 nl,lllllll • k4 • 11 Imo— ;I`lm■'4°.,Gti ■mnnntr_. OM il °ill 1414r11111 • IIIIT. Ie= = \ u � l Il�_ �a � il��i „, I '' u o1 � I 111 s E, ( I 1II ii • --I i i= • n- iuuoiiiiio11 11111111' III I _ 9IIII1111111111 - _ '-'Er .. _ i�g '— ���__ pllllllll� I I i . T �� �� " 1`P k . _wit% , 1 v �b1 • II : :a, IN . .■.■4 4JIj * drfr... Q IIIIIIIIIIIik liiii11611lll ir dun - 1 :::s` IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII111111111II IIliiiiiie .rill- l .- =1:1�i : _ , i- - = -I II I I 111 Iii _-n� — llllnlmlulnnnllllllllu_1 1I FRIIIIIIIIIII!::; ull° IIIIIIII"' II � hI IL1 ,1 ' _ 1 '- '` i .. . - t-6' j 4,7' _ LIMIER! 11 �- —,idi 11 `I limb !MIFLJ: e?Z °''? ;s. d _-_i' il�` ' . p_i " II IIIIIII IIIIIIII - M6 I ':,. : Pali - Gt\�""' � � 111\ —I r1'1 I �� = �- unnnln:: O I I I 1 C _ _ II' ii''`� _ r =�'III i__ _ 1Illlnl1 IIIIII11y I z ,, ,, =E /- 1 . Ill%: 5 .�i.. �i .■I, 1 — IIIIIIIII'IIIII'I __III— -: �; — II -_ l - -� ___I I I I I II1_ ` Llihif ±.. I] pIIIIIIIIIIIIiiiiiiiiiii11 ul l___IHh1OIIIll!_IIIIIIF= Foa ( ilp �m II - S v D iiili�� a�i�ilullilil�IIIII - g r 1>b� hii��i'111�1I1111111! IIIIIIIIIII� IIIIIIIIIIIIIII � Ili Q, yell ,I TLII I—i� IIIIIIII I_11111� .loo■ nbs, __� a�_11IIII 11111 ,111II�,lI 41111111 I HI011hIIIIIIIHIIIollI IIIIllliililiiliiiiiiill!111►'' =_ Liffil ... _ I' MOO 1111111_; ' - Fpi :=•r-,N I- - „ 4 S Q 4 6<c co St „ ,q 1 --11/29/39 a„ „,, PRELIMINARY 60 UNIT APTS RIEBE & ASSOCIATES hUN G—C RrN BUILDING PROPOSED FOR ARCHITECTURE • PLANNING L,IMrr c2 f�R-IR4NP ,\ 1' IBM SE 4t ND STREET - ' 'ELEVATIONS RENTON,WA 3025 I12TH AVENUE N.E. ISBAOUAH,WASNINGTON 20027 HELLEVUE, WA6HINCTON 98004 EDev-Riebe e...N`�"••------ (206)(206) 889-9653 (206) 624-1557 ARCHITECT Aao . Ic.It a,. 0 . Iminumum mime ,1!• 4 ' - IIiIIIIuIIIIInIIIII !!lun IIIIIE= i1I " ' .g1I or_ I�� i.ai ■r.. .. _... . ..w.■■■ ■■■ li ■...€ • 1 4JI '!Ji 11111I �ull I � �� I II�a .I61111 jI!II l�yl� tg, !Liii'iuiiiui v,oS° , a y ikiiii. __ a III _l,IiL! III III11==.__ ■■r.=: I�- rill �_mil II II_ I \Fill - 1.. ��- I - 4,. IP • II � i ��_�_ IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII� I—IIIII — ill , H Ili 47-11----iir-'1' _ I _���':- iii _- _ _= __= I rr6.r ' ` ICI I ! _ _=MIIj11Ii!!_ _ ='I'� ! I I 11'�,b'� ., III■�' ' 1 I.� '_ m�� I �om1m unuu m■� , „_. • e I mnmmllll��` I ' __�.uI .1 ''n i ,lic-,•,—, ' I!L■-..I IIIII II1�11�:=!__)D . mgiml8l!C=: \r. III _� T1L = 11111 ' :\� IIIII , � . I "71/1"Alik. IL ``� I ����1 < I' - IIII"'I' � �i al l 1. ,i7 O I �I, _ "II jP ui IIiII_ai� I� III,,pfiH"\, I _-i. I , �i = ,li I��1 1 \�� I 11 �1I ,. i �..... ��� = Iii:ii 1 �_ DiIITimITim ' • 11 E Li1 •-111 ICI iml =; I i !iil_. _�►, �ls,!°i i "•/ I 1' IIIIIIIII9811I .`` b .......0.I �I! 14!.14lllllllllllllIIIII�IIIIIIIIIIIII �Itll 1 • �_ I= i'_i �� I` i A I1!� 1r� ; — I�Ii;1 1 Willi I1111� I $ , ;nnmw i41�,jI`�R• ua�:r(ifra€=I-� 'r—ii o E _uu■;tH E ` i it 1 —�-t� ��i:ai. ;i IIII I 1 �E■ pp • $ • tIWIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIL IIIII- I IMF 1-1 U. �: ' IIIl=li II _ -= Ic 1 �� II II=I II •__ i;i s Iii_ .- , a—..■. = I nn! d:- II s . lL gII H low-= ! falb, G....1I lomll.: Ii1 1I� , ; . MI�IIm-ilFulati ,7 I■1` I1u . f. II' ■ - . m 7 c . II/29/89 , ' PRELIMINARY _ 60UNIT APTS. - 1* N °" "° °"�"" BUILDING PROPOSED FOR RIEBE & ASSOCIATES LIMP1IrD t�NR'4? —,10 ARCHITECTURE • PLANNING 18868 5.E. 42 ND S111ff} GI ELEVATIONS RENTON,WA 3025 112TH AVENUE N.E. ISSAQUAH,WASHINGTON 66066 BELLEVUE, WASHINGTON 98004 EDennoRaha ` (206) 889-9653 (206) 624-1557 ARCHITECT -- — • • irj' 1;�1 i;,, . •'i7Jls if .. ; u1, T I. ,c:: ;1 I I i 11 lb iji. -I11 vacant land ` 'c 4 0.52Ac =' �. .• �1 l� 1 Q, a a 114 T.t. © 111, I I ltl tel ' t�1 t •nn'alif" ' 1 + "'/al ^ i it; rt.43 D t4r lekj y I �� 449: "SP21 16 II } ra 0. IAG ' -- - rla...6 rt./4 'CFO I °�� .94 ..;:=,off' =tern _ • r t./ 7..c.tzc -- - ,t rrto y 27 1 pi •ji .I(t5$11% o ?4 i L__f I r+-J9J7!re■ ��nolslit Li) 041 AC 2l2.I. • .'_` /2Lil—i 90—� i r: t h , • 9 I 113j ' • • re,/79 Foe . .e' .n t• o n - �hdo buss Use o; r c�R° 1j6 a` n - A`` •ys:in T �:=900 �NOER -CRo551 1Ec g 1, t / �aOY. _ - ���. 0ER �,M' „oft R r , j "" - :l ' commercial ', , �� �'90 UNITS .. -ri�G 5 ,. AI,.t. .1Lt.' 27 oQQ �.� p'p 3 //� �it,yO apu 1 vacs •t land `dl>r'�fs d d --_ ------_ h ■par men �- V i„- , �o��� , - ss , 56UNITs 1?)- SUNSET.:, • O P I Ca69 AC. IAYCRN L. 1 I 2 P�o�S�����. residence 118 Q I O •• b •'ln.. �v ��LAUREL--HEIGHTS E 4/ apartments I ` S 9„ / 1 PG�� �5 .0��� ' ❑ aT./.Jf • / ACONDOMINIUM i i o '�o•((>P :�.� �1 residence 17 �; I •�� `' .7./• 4'tiI ' ' •195--29-iO4o-__It44Q--.-t}!_45.3 'o14z- A CONDOM -a wrtmen ■ • Y a �e A 151 -`, ' NI" • ( P resldenolel rswldsnolsl God/0 It " IAP1, ti n a o t 9b �. 1 ?-'~ I .64Ac. + •ti ^'0.62Ac. .c r .IEI -+ 113' •:: 16- r= _-' er eniht 2 It„z 07 r IIR p, t o ���wr• • . • residence sso r,5 '023 Z1 , ' ra..ba t'" • N E. 10TH PL. ;r • 1.90Ac. I c �.. .ti, 2, s4 T.a .14 v vaaant land W e•ealdlltridi r �tss 4,8? a ,e \��/'—��ti t'i . M resold: 4 c. I / h ti M ilol Ill:..� LI.JI , c t JOHN L. N ' r::1 1.''.': o �5 [� - I I �ANATTA e � s e2 .d, 'M o o98..1/ �. r -,no ,M1tir IOM � F �Qn 41105 '.=15: r I t I.IOAC. ` 3S 1� °�� S AZ 18 u7s '•'."'�: �; 14 - I 6 e / I rssldanae7•t.97 1IZ II(1N 1 ' M:. v■cent land c vsaant land Q v % ' / . 263.4.1 ,�I,�) ._Ie_. .3.7r7' ? •i� N.E. 1 ��t•�: ¢ '� 17[.l1 /� / v'4'21ist rr Si? 6°96•eildtti4ibl■ x�n ii•�V/; I ' [I�._�J1�""a ► $ 0.33 Ae.8 j J I , NresldeQnoe 13 ------.. 1 • I / land 0.35Ac 021 B ® ;. 1644 ri3 ;,T E i l60 90 A7l.9; • tcDOS 73 —;'• 96 Rl 3 o 9 N N. 10TH residence �;. ' residence• _ R/7 .0 C 4, ~t, `. I,q apa 9��o-wtcs `i •• 1 1., ` °.. sidenol■1 I'• .7 1 t • �: Q? YPt �.,, - fI�VL�J r --- ------ --' 1 t Jao.o� �r.���hN h h � o .,, y ,. • h I, 1 , ■psrtmente w] V. veoent land vacant land "' �°{; :�. -► s4.',a � 1 ' � Sg 6 � 7 ti 9 10� II 112 I� � I! .�`•: a / .. .„/,., It ... •t, ' z6B/e s 6f.J6 • 1resld�noW b .r.1112068.187 /� bo�, •rat lnoe c'• 6 9IVA 1� j 4 • I `` h (9 rssldetncI-i1 / /':' I J rem �' .j/.,fir �y resl8inolel 9TH -1-4,•.<.:.. -. v 136 57 . x1 0 70 0 apartments _ '45 _ . residence .4 sd `-I _ �o-- o Z C - 8 01 9`-'0 5 ' I 0 9 f 6.] _. .�,, '•I tl 1r • In 2 405?,: riiealdan- I residents AC ' 218 2. 3' e 4 101 . ` 'L 8• 9 ':o: sent t.'r1 • o - c(r. I—F 902 ®4 -4 • vacant land ■partmen r._ __ '^ -...--^f I - ' st e2 ct l 2,I;.7 I •;.4 ''.o° ruin de IAI J. •J • e • • rn ' -15•ealdanoa.1 , ' - •/a4i1 ' C 1 ., g 2i 2I s 20 19 ,, IB •I1' 16 I O I3 ,.-e.C.., / ..•.So•" ti /t • •9eK�� .. pit • y 1^' o •`4 1 '', ........ .is. (`�� y Z ,JF.GF I/�I - .9�. l'i \ ,sY a �: L�J LC�J woant lan , B \ �- e .. 6 37d ,S 7p realdanoa - 1 t`=`t �e]c�6/ (v' •o t, fSt.� (`�,� O. s • SC ''7 • W''''" - " " " ' • CH 4 77$ Na 4ts 1 EA '� Z 1/9 4d [Ull •1*CO ;�)�'•.!j 12 �� � ' ,8.. as - 7 z7 r• O 026 I 9Y s '-t c„ - i•24 � 27 21 •- a i137, residence , mac., Dent land 4 21 ' r D� el nod! $3 a^/(., 0'o I�4 L �l�i'.� n• LI `� T Z r 260.79. 1• f;,� ,sa 10 rV ; 8 0�I�•? .', •, " 8 I �'�� reeld nol y residence I7�[' resldeno sl .ti:.Q ..�� i6y;-4 W i•_I,_4 I 1 1. ,af*�I -•��i Ij j vacant land d' Y I 1-.-!. ... ..,.,,., ,, Z I 4- 6. '� • - "2--• Ea 71 f t y 71 v, 'Ielr �' ci 12 , • ;pir } !antiI o- 2 1 IS Z �' ` M �''� 1 10 Q • 5.3 A >� 0/69 75 ,�r;1 c%s P• }�^ 1Uesldenol*` E rtrs� G/ 1 _ 11 ryC \' business I 61's Id !d 6 .ly: (I- • ,{l 8 T s r �© - 80 /.{,I6S' \\: A.AL ^' / • Pee dt�n, 7� �• . 1' •' - I y • .1'44' 1 \` IfJ/Alf • : 7 • „ 1 e,C�.,i k • Ice dd 'S '1 •>I >/I�/-� 5 F-jt---,� . W Y am'; , S�, ' 8TH� •• ST•• . _ 1� ,: : 101�1y N �'4016:11 �R `L 7e.t7 p vao■n l d r■eldenolal ,.. i� • W CSR O�, � ,•• ;{ �(� ? 08.'r o,, ''..2 - 3 •If tE So .• 1 . N.C ' iliZC Jr • `, •�1, ` p .•: r I -....L L t 4 0 1 Q �`J J ,C trsstdenot■1 s • n e • e!•as Id�nola2; S �'j' �'.1 a , ^ 7 T y J U lit rs r_ o / •'f: • ' 21y . ea, 6 �T � /. • °o v■a■ nd �6� �02At 28 ut� • • 8 4 � S north r.. . 'bl‘11 �?, t�o9• 2 'e ► - r 7 �•' ., reaId nolal d21 :°3:)/1...14 — �� c sTy '2342 IN T Arep,SCAL = 1 = - Li 0 'AI ill J�, N sirir 14 50 s��'i 15 1,'6 1 LEGE D ., .Iif«�tsyal %1 % . ----•' --- g a el driJ un • fined 'edge % \v ' c - n curb quit .r >, ��;� � I � ; �1i 4 1'lh'I __1 , ... . ....... .. .. .. 1_, .... r • - I -- M.. to---1 1 r ► ! + r -- ��,'.,1w-' Iii er•,1 or;' 1:1.1 t; ,1 0 1 I ... ....lIJW ; 'iJ I V1 1 •v000ntc Ind ' N . O.S2 Ac •11�} IAG i _-_ _ it j.____ 40,,. 27 tl- I O �' =97.:r•;_=,odr"' _Ier: _ _ T L./ T,L.124 o . . 0! _DI Q 1 - 1 *el i g4 j n 1 -` U210 r •°ti i // -Tt . l !I ;or rtn ti • „s 0 :96 7R ~rc^ V I r1.117 1 n,J �4 w T.t.Ito '1 E� 0�� 94rr I I L;® 06tAc. , .�..r sr 2ca I:9�.d •••••• In... nl/s6• -► Q ? ! , ji. H 0.62 Ac I N N 0.43 Ac.® a �, �; • a LJ 1 K a r,t./ss N• v rr,e .� LJ r74.1/"Ei _ � oricr z .3 1793-7 - --ts I•'• , 02® 36 1 e0 Lr .4C CO r` re■ nolal 152 , •- • Qti'-cx ,� ®1 0 '031Ac. c vwl 04IAc);* . s ,� • 7s?1. _ 71 9 /27.f)-1 90-� .� r: t h p • • r++Ti9 11�r • I rr.r79 Sto��ociQ_ 11. 'e.:•,n t • endo I bust See - n 5 �Ess-- --9 e• r ecRor= n 9 _ a p p:: ,rr '. Q' •ysln a , - I I 1 NOER CROSS , is th;:: 1.1e / G /� 11 27 Q 1_./ \ O 5 .. all.,,. � ;1 va O.o 0❑, / S y��`� _r 1 apairtm� t. vacs •t landd ---- spar mamas , fLa ct•t 1` I, -Li 0 1 / 7 56 UNITS ��4' SUNSET SET. 1 :, °afl.PArr r:9 of c I C�65 Ac revERN J,.5 r V, r i I i 2. P 00Sk• y re■ld■no■ 118 ' I 0 b •• Inas • ;LAUREL-HEIGHTS . 1 E P�1{ 5•�F S4/ 9r4 / apartments .1 1 ‘ • -- .Al p :T./,/r / A CONDOMINIUM 11 '�C P �' 1 rssldano■ -7 i 41 .°;. 1 / -I Q CONDOM ^t p�Q •� •d I I w' I /4� etr_ r :195-24-�o40----„tto---•y3-•S.f d917•--- I a d•• A war,. •- r -a' • a reeld■nol I reild.nolsl • ,J 64d/O : � . SUN3Ct / n iii Er rn 12111111 9ti ;:;-+ h,{--j": -ti ,^ rrN644c. , ti NU.62Ac•u `�rAs9 Ir/ r,'• y JEI •n 1�3' 1..�' _`\ 1�L f--= -__' , I ■r ntil7t / /• 11 112 e7 r Na P. An '�i . r 4 V r..ld■no. reso . 1 rrS 10 29 Z 1 ---, , 1��.64 i` N E. 10TH PL. 1, • 1.90 Ar,. d vacant land UV 1 rssldlrrida r ' •rv5 ��' =✓.rer III�:�i t.,,r ti t T.[ 34 "+ �, 04 c. 1 / �•g1 , Ilex 7 � IIJ, - a , JOIIN L. „„ Y e l0 --�- 1_ IS 0 pi / 4ANATTA ;H:?;r a hg er M o I • o9c9.3/ N , ti je„,e' V f3 �' „!demo / ti 1024 t- � 4 II05 M ^'' „ H 13 far- -_-t- 1 r.[.,o ti ,' `�' 1.10 AC. P 1 3S es a ',► kJ- , ri 6 / /r.ald.nae Z At re u7s '..m: • vacant land o vacant land 14 $ Q r' v'°l t •?c,.4T „�� ._r�_. _ N.E. 1 ¢7r.f7 ,.�:, ---_; t 7 �Q // f �q''27-64i t ►r ,:► ro9 9erseIdillrfi8l■ /L.77 �2 - residence _-- 13-- Cipj-- -- I I 0 0-- _h / , lend `2 021 ~ ,- 6Q4 63 'r Tt/ /eo • 0.35Ac 90 /09.94 ,cpiS 73 12 reeldanca 3 Rl3 �� 1 / 9 " N N. E. I OT H A residence --------- N' 1 / , p"":711r� rM h� ,, - T eldsnolal fflllln 1�.� 'r - - " ( 1 /�/ aL90.0 G`I\J' ��y �, M •y iii �h o `� 1_n h N c ; vacant lend • I h , I ,,, a��] •.•- vacant lend ti ,r o `I c SQ•,?a sc I 5B 6 a 7 9 10 II IZ 13 I. m / �/ /i ♦ �/� l 1•• . ! 2 A/B s al.36 reeDdonu al V j/ �` bo J [ •r■ 1 rno■ o • 1 as M l rr.,r,v 6 9• c a� - r j. m lil % 49 Ili .% i us% ' 5 ,Cry • .. V' /// •%V' 9 �/ � r [.rnr rs■Iino ■1 9TH r■■Iolr. -A /// ! / PE`/-'//.%/ /4 yr sa z35 c1J l r+r s ss n p 70 O apartments r-_ •'*s _�N resldasioe e 4 •,t Sd1:',., I• •� - . 0 may-' � 'pr a C. 8 Lti IA � ; • - Z Z • r 40 s 1� •,!.sld■n- ! I resid■g:IN AC' N 718 2 ` 3•• 4 ' S ^ 6 ` .1 f g 9 111 - _ic. I Z c• 1ltt a•,r ltel~. :e: tee) f.01 N o 1 ti 902 ®4ri 7 4 vacant land a ■rtm.n , ._ _ .._`•f - •1•l.;.4 e•.oe ?it sc.+. P •7 r - PS er A rw■'dinolil �. ,t Sn r ' -'residence;/ l /a al ' d ., tl i e22 11 20,E I9 N 1B I1 M l61 ,9c,fy r :?So !cc • '9r�C�� 1 !-1 I o '°° jam �o� ti D - Z 0 •4JC.CF ^l a�� 9T 1. �.'. i sc •• •ta•• `..r 1 1 ( ] 111 . vacant. lan• Q^, • . ` L,, ,w. • . „' , ,n to s / �.l,�_ s N.E. m - 70 37,9 J-i 1f 70 13 no ` ,�11 • 9- `{ 70,S rs■Idanos [ cf-eel �d 6/ (v ��'o ti :11 _ ssst• �'(� -' ' 2p��9p�c M = *. '7 -et,� ', _.. I •13 IA -g t a '*. Z .1/9 4! ff:i 'CO :.PM 12 ..a • ,g••. 6 }Iv Z 7�?� fl�1b • 9Pt - L t ♦1• 7r �• CD a essidenee 21 [�26 � _' 24 21 , ' e 11�'` 'L • cant land -,, 4 ��, , 0'k-. Moil 53 4.1/., ,ro �!• m ,� �,,,;••. .„,ii:_ot;,rit: W `fl1. Z r- 260.79. 52�R ,)v. to j 3 ��11o��I�-:� ;gig 8TH drnol �.. •esid.nos 1 �• 12 Y Q j'"� A •,iP ,( -1 1`eeldsnae !1 - resldsnoleF�- �d:.4 `�I ILI a•_I Igal vacant land h ( a 19 ^ ti l 1 Z �•- 7r e°� r3 ltj 'E,• fl 1i 71 •! I I' 13, . • > cant tan" / /i o- • `� r• /6Q 75 IUh°eetd.nolwtEire `�, ,r�Liyiii- _/65 - bu■In■a■ �,t_` !�,5 /r i■d� d�0. a Q •!' ^%.LE' 8�� _ ,80 • • • BTH • ST. - � 1 _ �, ►•o ,�, .,'�! �,�,a ,� Q 141. N f��.J �R CO ill ti . •., 19 J ; . le . 441141411 yeoman trd • �s,r r bib. •o '•�.'^-,�] o ` �. so ., N C •^ e'f�/I )�ij• `, p.. n .. r , i��:cl `' 214' .� d C raeldsnolal .. ' I. ��1ldengirtlil c•^y , �'r P. =ae • 3 ^ S . So tzir ill/ 6 ;41N °ci vaoen�ind ti, 4 `07A� ifi r�tl • 1 8 4 ;'� S, :'rp t 26 25 ` . 1.7 4 worth. �, ,� `g, 4116 �3 tlyb ^� . &•(/‘ c-, .... ..... rep/ 0,,,,t c•- 4/14IN Tlik' ', ANL': Q I to -/ " C ' IS' #1Xii. = �11 t _ l .1 11 3.• •tip ,:,^� AC • r la ri co co ,,Ofsldw'3 al 1 ,\� L E D '� A `I`, .; 1 . ,____-•/ --- g a el drib • un - - fined 'edge II , \ ':� . 1• '��'�; c • n curb\ Butt :.r :, �'•'` • \ \ I (l �� '.\ IP13,•� i \`c11� i.l I' • • ------4,I ..Pa--' Ill •. r r r 7 . .. • III r' r, I:bl ,� , '„I ` , i •I�fS j Y 14111 :1 1• -i10_r `�d` �1131i- If T--3--r��-,, ., r `:: 042 k -I., vacant land , • Q ti ��:: O.S 2 Ac '—^ '� I I I�iJ = 12; III �� Rio i0 A �, —I 1 Z Icl 1e► (Al re °l s;^ �t.r nadir.; . . D �s s,, 1 o c•c 9: °sv z� 16 u } td'c >t�s „lilt rim N7 3, = _ _ _ rt / 71.1Tc ---/ i GHQ gp 1 7.3 • • •.....>NL .N •• )I�TIOr1 a� O n I IrG ! a4.ishdo bu.12�i:. = .. n t @ 51 ...,:: ss� ,a r r :ceg6H5 Q` AccE G` T r 0 N� CR tgo_ . OV _ ��ii f UNDER t'MI ._' /R y_ - '' I _ ,� _ \ .‹ ffJ// Is commercial UNIT . .... oommsrolwl �( /v�/ 1it 1 S I • 27 q -• - Ds ..I�� 0. 0u' ❑❑ i ys� ■pertmr}r�te _ v■o■ c lend _ doper menwt 1 U k(c IL . --- r--, r-- -'"--- "' 7 56 UNITS " � SUNSET.:; • �pPS6P�t; 18ril o Q m69 Ac rAv RN IS ' N. `, 1 I1 2 OP•0 ��� residence sa/�S w° . 1 0 b • Ines • ;LAURErL-HEIGHTS 0 I E • 9- / p I P(' �5 O V� I 0 A• is / A CONDOMINIUM• 1 °.o I , ?II -I A CONDOM o '�piaP O��A b1 residence 1.7 0 ; I •,� h .T,. ,•�. ' _195-r9-40b0-,--77440--.•«3-45.) an ?- , • 4 r _ Gad/U 151 ; •. , so„scl a` • " a re■ d■nol 1 ra■Idsnol■l a o . �^ • 9ti I --_�;: � _ I� .1"64Ac. 1/It Ic.0 t . �,b JEI 113' '�:• 16� r=_=_ _ I I �Psr tndht It rl� �I a T.n y, t r��wr. F • a residence sso . I rrs ion) V. Z I --- ---` ►4..ee 1`' II N E. 1OTH PL. 1.90 Ac.. •`.� 1, * r.t 34 a vacant land I11 I reeld . / •,rl .ter 7e \:,�,�{ti s M W,�+ o44Ah� I JOHN L. �VI� Nti M4 lima ' JII, �- j_.. !' 15 5 Q 1010 :'r ANATT n • %.ti:%: b M o er : .d, M 7p ,_....JJJ T:: - 698..3/ C Veilino ,stir' 1020 ,�SFr -v r! 4 1105 ,., :r'• --- =�i1 it.roi` r6 1.1oAc. i ; Js x "aqv, ' Rz,e urs '-i: 14 — $ ADD 1 1 6 e i / r.sid.nos7.t.97 Ni Z 2 . : Siv■cent land o vacant land Q l I .2tc�.a.� �rr� .-ram. N.E. ¢7I.f7 _� 71.1 �Q7 ` 151 t-,6 ►r ,rr lo9lgl.e'.i rfibl■ Ti.?? ii eiff residence 13 I �I • / lend N 0.21 Ate J N �' - ---%64?6J 1 1 — r 0,35Ac ::•� Tt.l , l6tl 9e M9.9; rCD�S 73 la N ----- --- --- 1296----R•j--'� + 4 9. . N N. E. 10TH residence / /" r:...)s rs el3r1 •rn' residence �'in t. / ■p■r� prllt h1 r„ ,.Stirifi" sldenolel ��':. ; vacant land vacant land • I h I i �I �^'J ( e :,�:• a S4.1 7� `c 'I 58 6 7 9 10 I I 12 13 '-F4' I. �, ,,„/��j,r �,� �� ,,. l7 �.. r 2MI8 '7ls E3.J6 N r■■Idenol■l • t 6o 1,i 1 . tbi / /, i ,, 11 dir . . cr- lo#3 6 ...tir 1 k 2) 7 . ,A EttilaiC6 . 63 . 5; ----'„ : u+ i • cI toh l� rssldsnoll 9 /�//.i 1 �O ra. �, _fr./n.► �; y rs■Ic$snol.l 9TH -k /,./ / / a ?'E'/., //,%./ 7/ I ` , i rag t%I.. es ,l a. �O department■ ' '*s _-;� (b residence .A .�, sd _1• ` . E] C 1:::, sl iv 8 0' is • I 9 N .'• W 1 , ; , Z Q C. Z 218 2 6 ` 7 Q� 9` if t_ ln z qo S t; 4ieeldsn- r■■Idsno A c� s tt.e•4i: Nei 6 .7 a eT r:rl _ C7 - o�1 • 1 902 ®4 -+ vacant land spsrtm■nyk .- _ _- `^ - .- .`^ I - ,a 82 rt 2'I:. ,'i•..4 e•.oe rwa•didolil :.;s .:I( •f',I• to a U iresidenos . rrH1�s1pAii •, `f g 2t1120^ 19„ IB Il 'I 16 I b I5C.r.9 / ..so`^ ti/ •..yt��� � ".: '.4 Igil o•:. .. ' Z 0 -1Je.ce " i .ii'm 1 • .., f 2. 6 / Z d' \} - , D m 14�.no T w N.E. 7o a reeld.no. L.5 =i J 29 1� V• ilii' ` 1/94r -J :.., .r• L` e.. d. 1 _�T1. =` a residence 21 on I 9Y1 .� e^ ifiq1, �i'24 �3 21 e.• _.71? • a • INd • cant land 4~+, 4 �7• r .D 8 nail 53 i. Li �.; 'o�O ' ,• .r .,+. .,,,..T�-J ' b ``LI L f 260.79. 52.....10 ,19 �� I �, t • Ior.., �� 8TH PL!y.ldnal �.. Gl i .■Id.noe �D• 1z Q I .9. -1 reald.nos 11 r■sldsno el-1_900 1a::�� W '�! 1z..;_,:, I 1 hil ,., f. GI vacant land r6tJ� • ='s d 19 ^ Y ,• ��I `'' Z ' "4- 1-rr- ` �4.4 • lilt Ili •tL � ho g71 2 i5 o • !c • i 10 . 81r a 6Q i5 n'^ t11 h■sld■nolwl ^' " i r� business ,0 [1'-. /V l'�' �, �� .t.4.5• Q AI 1 1 ride d& 6 I a O •1 E 8 ry 4 ; _ 90 Z It4u,t rl' r ^v . .taKE; S7: M. • 8TH Ve.• - ,13,cv ► I •, • .`1 ° �• 03 Li. ,. ,. �. • A1411 Q vaoan idled 161 7.1.116 .1 re■Idsnolal 'h ,. Q `'4' `\ 0 ;• ` •618: or i,`—eye±M • 4' o lF 4l s •reald.notwl S_ t..1d.n lad ti 4, )J /�;�/ !�`� 71-y t 1I ►11• •• 69 •n 5 11 • 11 • 1 .J •gi +.T' V so T2l 61 �'! +: '• 10 'I • ^ 6 tI 5a sa, 6 en 7. .� °o vacs �nd ti 7 �o1At 2E •i 1 8 �'''' . S. $ :ior . :. aost. 26 25 `9 ,1Ie 4 _• .'10r a+� • rem 'bl ,, 1,09 �//- L - ...II, ]S '1 • `�' • re■Idlsnalal iCZ r� r� . at , .:I 9 y _ �, , d,, • VICIN Tlib' A . Q II . i ll l • -i t% r,1�5 .v • ..�� P SDAI 1 = — �' D • J,e,, 'ifLtiki. ‘); so' •SF.e7 , I1 ' LE G E D .,�;i�.ld ,oyal '{ I _11 ----—'l '--- g a el drib un • - fineicl 'edge `' �'' \'4 ' � �:c • np curb qutt :•r C , � 1 n •\ I •, • 4.1 Ili ci 'NueCITY =2 RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works Department )Earl Clymer, Mayor Lynn Guttmann,Administrator January 14, 1994 • Mrs. Susan Lauth 949 Aberdeen Avenue NE#315 Renton, WA 98056 • SUBJECT: Sunset Gardens (SA-006-90) Dear Mrs. Lauth: At your request, I am enclosing copies of reports and correspondence which are related to the children's recreation area at Sunset Gardens. • Specifically there is a copy of the Staff Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner and the Report from our Hearing Examiner permitting the project. The City's approval of Sunset Gardens was based, in part, upon the applicant's project proposal which included a children's recreation area. Because the recreation area was a part of the project application,the City did not need to require the play area. (However, if the applicant had not proposed this amenity,the City would have placed such a requirement upon the project, using State Environmental Policy Act Rules and the City's Site Plan Review Ordinance Criteria • [4-31-33]). I have also enclosed a letter to Dennis Riebe, project architect, (dated 9/3/91), concerning optionsffor removing the play area. A review of that letter will likely be useful in understanding the City's - perspective on removing the play area and the procedures for requesting such a change. If you have questions, or would like additional information, please contact me at your'convenience. I look forward to assisting you, in any way that I can,to provide a children's recreation area which works • well for all of the residents of Sunset Gardens. • Thank you. • • Sincerely, • Lenora Blauman Senior Planner • • • • • 200 Mill Avenue South -Renton, Washington 98055 w ..- - ..,....7. ' _.,-.....=,, . ' !----7 )-'-'' • - .. ,• •- ••.••••••••••:-....:.:-::::::::::::-:::::::::•::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::•••••••:'?..:::bil4Wr.44......::T:::::.:i:::::::::::-. ..•:',. ..••••••: ?•:••:::•::?•:: :::: :::: ••••••..-.........•••••••••................:::::::::::::.::::::x:••••::::•:•;:i:••,::::::::::i:::::,:::::,:::.••••:;:::::::::::•:.....:•:•::...................„,......,,.......v,,,,,,,...7,......................... „............... ........::::::::.::::::::::::....::::::::::::.::::::::::...........:::::,....::::::::,...„....... co1414. U...14....,".....T.........:X.......:11)......F.........Y.,....,.......... . .:P'P,,,Aw4;:::.ii,,,,, .,,,... ..7.77.:.b.....7...........................................„.................:,......::::::::::.:.::::::,::,::........:.::::.:: •••••••••••••••••••••"•••••••,...V•ri..lax.J...A.,.E...c........::::::::.:.:.:.:......:...............:,................:...............:...................................: 1:1:1•1:-..::::••••::::::."!...1....1...:::::.....1...s.:::.:!.!.:::::N:•....111!..1:1:i..:.!..;::.:•.c."....1:::.1.1:.:.1t..1:::)::!.::::!!.:1.:1.1•.:!..1.1•:.1::E:::NV.:::•:::::•::::::..t: R1 ,,r1.,:iii••:::Nlit............ ...i....E....:..::........14s.,.,.!TT......A.tHAli.....r."••:...:.:.1.:7:1,..,. .......,:t,..:::0.....*::.::..........:.......ik.:!...:1::.k.::::::............:......11.....1......p...........1::::::Hil.....t....::.1...........":1::likibikis.....:.::::1::"1::::"......"1:::1:::1;.:1:,:p1.11::::11........kii:::.................:::1::::i.....:::.:::1...:::::.::::.i.......?....1.....i.:::::.....11.:1.::.i.:11::.....: •••••••••• ••;i••••:•••........••••••••••••::-..........*::::: ::••••••::••••..:*:.•::::.:.•:::1:•:::*.•.::•:.::*:i::•::.x.-.::'........:.x..:.:.:.............................:.......:::::::::::::::::::::>.::::::......:::::::::::;::::::::'....:•:::::::::::::•:::::::::::.::.,::::::::: : ::::::: : :::.: ::?...:]::: : :: :A:*:. . .....: ii.::::::::::::::: :::::: :::::::::::::::::::::::i;J::::.::::•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••'•:::::•:•;•••:•:;•;•:••••:::.•.:::: ::M : M .:M•::::::::.:::::*:::•::::?•••••••.:::;:;M::::iiN'aii::::•:•:•:::::••• •••••••••:. :i... ...Ui0aiit..::::::....::::.M........ .....imi.m..... T .:46".199•°:•:::::•:•:::::a::.aiMiiiMM:K: :::::::::::::•:•:••••:•:••••••......... s•annTAV:ii1:..i.:•Ps•••iii.,:::-.i••••:M.R:MMi:V.4b•••tg4F- ••••••:.:::...:::::. .. ii...i...Q.::...:...::.:...:...:...:::•.::::::::•::::.:••••:..........-•-•...-- .::••••••••••:::::::•••:•••••••••••.%•••.'••••:......::::-:-::::::.•-s.::::::::::::.:::::::::::::.::::::::::::::::::::::::-........:..........:,.:::::::::............,:::::::::::,................................. - ."""••••••••••••••••••••••••............................. ..... " .".-----"•••••••••-.........----- :•.:::........:...:......................:•:•:•:•:•:•.:.:.:•:................ •.•....... ...•.•••.•.•••.•.•.•................. .............. ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••:•••••••••••••:•::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::.E:::: :;:f...:.*....i. :::•?....??::.........:.•::.:.:.:.......•..... •"•••..•••••••••••••:::...--...............x.::::::.:'....:.:-::-...............::::::::::.:.::::::::::.::::::::::::.::::::::::::::........::::•••••::::::::::::••••,::::::::::::::::::,...... •••••••••••:::::•••••••••••%:"'.•:::.:.:.:.::::::::......:::.::::::::::.:::;::::::::............................:..s.....,.:...s.:,:„::::::::::::::::::::,:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::.::::.:::::::.::::........*:::::,...:...:::::::::*:. •••-.....::••••••••••'...................•::::::i:::':::::::: ::A::-:: : :::::::?••••••:•?.. ...::: :::;.s......2:: :?-..K.. .....:...........:...N ....:...* : ::......:?.........:..... :...:.::...:...:......:...*:::.:::•.......... :i......:?.:.....: ......::::: ,:.:h].. •. :':.•••......:.:.:•...:::::...*::::::..:.:::::•::::::: ::::::::::..:...:-E..14.15.....,;am..... 2.:::....:...:......... .m..A... ..... ... ..:mmii:.::::::::u:... ........i..................0.. ......km:.....: ::::::::::......... :...::::::?i,...:m:i..........:-::::::::. :....2....:.::. :•.:..::?:••••.:... i:I:•.:"..:*' ....:::.B.A.°16..R.....9. :1-1.........::.•.:4..M•E:gft.X.M ...:•:MU: •......••••:.• ••=...iii..;,...?.....::,:...ii%........ .6..15:. ..m .. .....s.i...i:..!?).. .....:... .:1...-: :::.........i...!..iiivii.......!T..;;;...i.....A . :::::••••••?•: :::::•••••:::::.:::* *:••••••*Derina.$..::*:,E..Y.J.,:::...:.-..-.•:•::::::.*:.::.:: : ::::,........:::.:.:.................,.......:•,....s........ .:...:.........:,. .... . .. lii:......•:::::A.... ..•::••••••••••••:•••••••::••••••::::::::::g.:•:•'•::::::.N" '•:••••••-••:.:;:::••••. V... ...:;..........A:••••:.i:•-• :••.. g••••ei:.:•••••::::::::::••• •••,•••••••::: :•:fffs :::::::••••••:::•....•:::.:::••••Risi•••••: :•::?:•::•:••• ••:•..:M..:........:....s.ii...W.:. ... ....00.i:r...M:ibiii.. ... . .:........:41.P.LT.i.PAN:RiNgNiMeffa:•& :.:"...... ... ... M..::: .•:.6......:a....:. ..: ,...:i.:i...i.:•.j....•:....:..........,;•..0. :,4 :.:..m....:.•:.:Aft.:.... .....T.:... ............::........ ......: •••••::::::.:....•:=:::::::::::::::::.:•::::: ::.....MM:•:.?:•:••::•::=M:::::•0:. Z.......0.:::::•:.?:::::niqii••••=::::::::::.:::: ....Sii:iii :Oti:.,.s.......q.g: 7...9.1..-..F.M: :::::::::M:.. .....b.•0::.::ifi ...::Mi... •:•••::::::.•••••••••::::::•••::.;•:.•.,:...:::::::k.i....a::.L.U.....*:.i,,,:::: :::::•..•: : R:•••=:.:.:MP:•.:.::::::.... .... :: :::: :.?..::.':.:n:::::::::.:•:::•:::...:...::.:...:.:::.:.::::::..... ...:::a:.....:::: ::....:...:::: :...:...:...R.::..... ...f..: e..:i:j:...:::::::::: :-......: : :.....: :.....i.,:...p....*...: ::::., .:•••••••:::•••••••••••::•:::::::•••••••'....1 °:JE.C•••-ufl...:::•:••::::: :ri:::::.:::••,•ii••::Iii•:::•:•:::;:•••::_li:::: :•:•••••:•• :•:::1-.?::•••••••••••• ••••••• ••••;: ::**:••••••::••••M:.: ..:1 :::::: ::::::::::::::::::.:::::::::::::...U...:.::::....:%•...... ........:if,.. ..i.:: : :•.......0:.............: ' .::•::.•':••••••:•••••••••:.:;::::::::::•7;;:i...........:::::::::::::1;::: :;.:..:::::::::•1:::::::::::::::1.::::::::..i-::::.::: ::::.:.:::::::-... .........:::-.-...::,-........ .............:.:::::.....:a...:::::::x: :::.:::::.:::.:..:....iii............. 22. 0.0...6it9.0...........:... . .h....::,.mii.........:......:.,„............::::......:::.:.....:.: . ..:::::::::.....T::::: ::.;''.:::':::::...;.41:::::::::::;;:4:.:.:::::::::::.,r..........:,,....::::Al:1.•Ki.:ivirv.....:::::.v.::::::.r.ril:%:.4::....r..%:-:-.:'::::ifiC. ktsii:ST.::•::: : ::::P.ig...q...f..:::::.M:. :•.........:•::.....a...:: :•::•:::.:::: :.::::::.... .. ....:-:.1:....A....1: ::::::1::::::::::1::..1:: -E:i.......:i: ..:::::::::::-:::::::::::::::t1.:h• iv. •i.../..,L.-nAji.......'...-. :+,.....,!?.!-...:.:!7!...,...:::.9i...i................ ....:::.:: ::::..... ...... . .....p.i......... ......:::::::...:•::::::............:::...:.::.::.:: ::::::::::::........: ::::; : .........:1:A... ::::i:).aiiii::::::t...•;:;S: : :::M.:: ...HH.........::•i,.i...:::::::::.a:::.::.:::::::.....:.........:::.....i.??:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:........:.:......iie„:.*::.a...s.: :: : ::.......:.:::::.::::::..4.. ................::::::1::::::: :?.. ::.:./.........:'........::...........::.::../....../.....:.:.::''':;:.:::'::::.....:.:.:.:::'................-........33:.:M :.:...... P:g9P,:c.?....................::::::::::;: ......:: :::: i...:.:.:.;.. ...,...:.....a,„4„.....„.„7.....:..:._:_:....:..:..... ......,.........-.:::::::..::.,...xi::,:....::,':::;,,.'h-D.'..Y.P.ifq:014::::::.i.OV......Z.P .9.?::-...:::::.::::::.:::::•:••::::::::::M.::::::::...,,A414V.:.::0ItP......;ii?.... ... ...... .:V71.:.:4.,4g ..:*::•:::::::::%::::::: ::...]:0..•.F.':'?...._ :.:nt....:::: -...::::•:-....i:: :::::::::.a ......Ui.... .ft... M..... .:.g&:.:: :X.:•.::: •.........:::::•::::::::.:•.::.:. ...6.......:::: :.:..:fiiC.:Iitij.:t1...7...7+ R ....t .d. ....:':.::::.:.:;::::.*:.:::: :::"' ::.::': '::: ::.':.::h ::::.:::.::::::::: ::: ::::: *i.......:•::'.:::.:: :::::: :: :::• ::::::•::.•*?•TOf....s...:.... .,:......q:..s. 4....:...... . ,.oii,::. :::::.::: :::::. —x:.::.. : :.:......:.:.........:.:.:.:.:.:.:: ...:111:111.1..'1.!1.....:1111111.1101,11.11.1111i:I:1:1111:1110011:11111:111001.100111:; 614.:.60t:.::14.::44;.::hsi.1P;.:.....rifil..01;.e.....::::.....:p.::010irx.i?;::::... .11111i1:1:: . :............ ..::::::(::teltiailty:::::: (.: 7 !....4:En.:*. d ...,.....,..t.:*:...n1p44.;rtr ii::::::::::.:::::::::.:.............:::.::.........:.„. .....a. .:....s....:: :::::;:.:.........:.....: :::m :::::::::.:::::.:::]:•....:: :::::: ::*::*h::::::: :::::::::::::,::.::::::::.:......:::::: :,..:,:.*::.,.. *:..... ....s..:...i..:..........„......... ..i..:::.:.:........:.........:......:: :::..........._.....::::::::,.......:.....7iii_i:i 1::::::::::::::':i*.''''':::::::::.':...::::::.:.:''''''""'"''''''''::::::::'''::::::.:.:':::::::.:.::::::::::.:.::::::::::.:::'::::''j::::::::' : : ::a6 :410.PI49..:.- : ....:•:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::.:,:......:.:.:.....:.:-.::.:.,,,:.]..........:.:......„. . ':i•11111:11:1111:1.111.:11.111r6.!11::.:!1111ilil:ill•il:.ili....li....i.::.i:::.1...:::!!..1:::...:.L!.....!::::i!!!!!!!...::::1:i.:::1::::::::!!::::.1111:*!::::1:t.:i11:1i:il....1:::1:::1:::::1:::11:::11.:::1:.::.;:::::.:::1:::1111.....:iic.c..::::::::1,::::.:ii1:-.....)...ii::..9...... 10i....lii.:....6.,:i.::::L....i....i....1.9:::::i.........11:...::::h......:.....1......m.5:...!...............:,...:......::::e.....1:::lit::::..............a:::.............:::.:"......e.:::::::11H::::::::117........:.y......::::...........„...ii...............t......::::::.0::::::::i:i:......i!....1.i!...i.i.i.i!..1:::::.:.i...........i..::::.................:.. ::::........::::::.:'::::::::.:::::.:::•:?:::::::::.:i::.%:::::::.:::::::::::11:04]..4. 0.V.10.:8:::4A.. !.!'. :.i.'. .'..C :.::: :M::::.......:::::::::::•-•*•:::::.::::::::::.. ........:.................. . ..........:::. ....i....:..........::_....,..._._„.................................. .i.........m ...i.:::::::::....i:::::::::::::::::::::"ii;C:?.:C41:TI:9: •::.:::::......h.....:::::.:*............::i..1::::::::.....1.::::••••:::::::::•:::::::::::::::::.*:.: :: ::::iiM : 04..i4m...::.6it...114illi......:....!il. ...m ,...........................:.:::•:............1::::::::::: ;;::............. ....2.......*.......:::::: a :v::::MM:S. .9 .11:1 ::,: :inAOSPif........,..„..,,,,...,, ,.........:::ilf&V4i .:&ItlW......Q.a :: • Aesthetics, traffic, ..........:14-..;OD:N.I8...StT.. ... .1:.....ftHi ... :..4::a:•::.:::::::::?............:::.::::.: ::.:wi.. ..: : ::.::•,.....:•::::.:.:.:•..::...:::::::::........ ::.:::••••::::::;•4..q..t.6171111117...... ......::::: ::•..... .. ..:.. .., ....:: ::::::::.....::,IP::::::.:::: :::::::-:-U:•:::?:::•:::::.:•:::.::::.::::':•:::::*:':::::::: : :::::::: ::.gi.M:::::::::•::::::::::::: ::::: ::?::.::::::: ::.tiatr.. .:4-.... M......... :... ali6::::::n. ... ..ii......... ....:::::::::::::.:.:::::::::::::::.::.:::: ::iim::::::::::::n:.......:n•,...:ig:: ::: ::: 0::::::::: mim... ...imin::::::::::::::::::: :::::::::::.......::::::::i....._...............,....„.:... _:_.... I ....... . ,._::.::::::::::„::::i.......i....... ...0::::::::::: ,.....,,...:::::::::......:.:::::::::::.::::::.:::Roi:Mia,:::in::::::::mmMli ::::::::ow: :: ::•::::imiii .:..v.:141....14q::: : :...t.k1141........r.... ... .. ..a....... .:....mi... ................. ii,E.i,-.....Iit?: PMa....:.i.......mii.:::::::::::::::::::.:-...... . ...........:::::::::::....;............::. 1:::.:::°::::::::::::::: : :::::. 6: ::1.:iii:::,W1:::::::::•.: 1...'.':::::::::::::.:::.::::..:..:...:::.:..!.:..::.:..:.........:..;.:....:.:::::::::::::::: *,.*::::: :iii:::: :::r.......*:.:p4:::::: :„... iv13.03... ..... ,..,...... m9....E..,:ii....i...............i.:..::::::::::::::.-:...r.ili::::::,:iN :::::i::.:::::.::::::::::::::::::•:...'::::-.:.::•.::-:...::.........:::::::::.:;:: :.::i:.::._._::.::::,:,:::.:,..„,:,:s:.:,:,:..:,-':.:,,_r.?:.:- ::::.: : :? ::: ::.:m:inmi .T.4p:.:- :::itt.::.t:.7::..: : ii:::J.:::::o:fiiw:.QTA7.7:: ::::m.z:::. i:::::::........::::.;•;:•:•......:..R.••••••:.E:- .•(•5141,11El\Tbi-vE:w.,:iii,......:4.:...ta.............,:.:a.......m......m. ...... ........:.::::: :::::0: tox.4144.....1..9:::.: :4.,.y.....e.::::::::,................:..z... i. ...... ...4„..toa;:m. ::::::P..::::::::::::::§::ii:::::::.7...:..17:::::::....;•.:::::.:::::::::::::::a:::::::::mMimimg::::m.x::::: :::.%:,mmiitisi#0:-.5.... ....7 .....1:i5iMis.::: ::onno i,.....,....::.:-:.:...::::-..:4:.::.:::::::::::::........„..:::............:: ::::::...:,..,..... ....:....:.::,...;:. :ii .;...,.............:.::: .....:::.::::::::::a................wwww..::-....m.......::.,.,-,:z ..*i..;..........,. .6..tal........67-.4mTv.. ..:::ft:...:..... .. :::.:::::. ''...•..' ' . . - N4.:Ti . .::n* :-::ii: OM:::.*::::::0:im4...: :g...i...iii :iii... .......:.....:-::.:.::::..... ..........: ::::I.:,::::::::.:::: ::::::::::::J..... .....::::::::::.. ...g:: :i.ia::..-:"... .ii:M:::: ::::::::: : :::•::•::•::::::::::::*i::.?:doltitiltIPP#:......::.........mm:m.........:::::::.:::::::-:-.......:•.„..::.......:.:....:.,............. . ''''' . •. . .''. .:.......:.:.''''::::::..........:.::::::::::::.::::.:''''.....::::::::::::::.::::::::::::.::::::::::::::::::::::::::::................„....::::::::,,,................ ......::::::::........................ .... . . ' • ......:'....:.:.::'::::'::::::'....::::::::.:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::..:::::::::.]::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::.,,,...........:.,.... .........-..:::.:::::::::"..":•.:":::::: ::::4bii. ".: .:.:M........::::::::: ::::::::a...:::: :::?......:11/2.:.:............:......................... • ... a I D:163 Ac. , ';':';;Lits:‘' -1 \ li --j E•i G NTS LAUREL H • • la 1-1- . c.0[ b In.. • m ,..."4 . 0 '... / A CONDOMINIU -I 4 ."''' ' '-'/:1'.11 i I ,ca '-.:s'' , z .,...i.:. .. -, -4--dg" . . 9 r'••Id.nc' 17 4 ICJ 't i•,.:"FT,s •-• ,I0 111.1.!r7c. -141' ,-: = .,.. mrnt ' ,• r; .4 N E 10TH ;..--r-,...c:" -------r.vw_r- -- 16 r• ; ,.• I, •-..._..... •4 ...7 ,..4),,,,,,•gc"' . • ^ Ovl‘t•''::-.31,...18!..." .-ss., • 1 "siCEB - Lill '''IT'411:7; ... .3; vacant i.nd 15 98.J/ 5...,‘N ic•s.7/Fr f,.icc•,r• -.,1,72? . , ,..AC. 1•::' ,:l'', 9 tO/S• . -:-- ,6,,3,, 6 t, I /r smIclono.T.1.97 .1.-tm.) 3- 14 if •••••14:"91} 1.9.f',` . R----1 r„.„-- ----7:;" ••-•gn"i / 0.33 AC..! 4,..._, s',421 ,--LL,,/,,,.., K:) 13 * ,' I 'ii 17,9,1d 0.35k 9.,I IT_T -.7g • ' .. N.E. 644 62 DI_1113 :,,,,I,1 ., 9 / ......., 2•--..• •-• \.. 't A•1•4'75E/9 s ;:, Ilk 1 .,1:41,. ,,,0,,..., [ "i) ,i:.4(.141'''`' ,,,,,, ' ,--V , 1:',",' ::,' r.': • , .t...,.. elldwoo. ' . _ " ,-,' , • 1 . rt, t. ,,.. ...- ... , S2 ic,-- II ell ..-4 3...,q^ l'a In" -.C./'' i . 71'.., -l) //''' . ..; (t7 •°' ,..r' 3,r . • .. o,[ ] w 11 '.:;. ;:',.. ;,.0. '•-„. til'f/ , . ..c'. L..1t'. • ' - °1'''-'. .. „ rs ,, ,c--_,), ,.,7„,..,.//, 11111., .a„ 9 .....„.• I,• , .§) . , , ''',;;;;',,,••••••" /„",/ • 76 ' ' ,,,,-z-, ,Qj .„:-ryn/odor... _114f, Lij' 1 a :--r1.9•-•'-.7 • . ..R.9,2 1-u. 218 z . -t_CC. ' • S..- 4n. .,,.. "4...ici.n-'• ic r". as co4r,., , rlir... LA •Z ,5,•Ell _,.I../ -.: .. .,..0.nt i.nd .,,,P.m-rrnTAr---7;;Von;2,-.;„../ I-- •• :. ...... ^, I": -0 .,444..n 1.nt CF 6 z..,//14.11.-•2 ..1.•....,,,../%47:,6,.....1 4 , , , N.E.‘ . .. rn 37d.:"..) 4/ „,31"iic• ".'21itt,m r:,-,.2), OP op co i • •.. , - , ,,,,.,,, ......„.c. , k, 1,e ...i'••...7,4-4:•__'',E, II se ,!4_,. . . . ? -1 '2-q":- tT_I-- ... 8 :6 i"L :110 *22- 2, -• -- . .. . . OA 5, 02-'cl ...,r..1 .?",1,, ''. ,, .; , ,-- •'''24 ;; m 16 L,,..t?_-_,„ --... -z_ - .1/9 4- ' ,. rt26 11, ,1661,1-,, ,4.-..7i. •• I" "" n..111 • • ..:::' ..:::.•• . '--) z-'-•'-'""d'n°4" Ilf.71!. ,'...491A' '... LLI ''11;!...,,,'" 4' 8 T H 1 . ' .t-9 —1-0- ••-, > '14.3 °I-V, - .., : , '..:. •.::, • Cr:: v.,.NI d a nc.s. !M.,: , , 1 9 CI: ZIT!,-3...II:214 14_1,5:-...2.:1„:.; , . 18,, fltikl '-, , ...'...., '''.... . c.... ''..L---••3--.,-,..cE .,,..id•no.1-1=L— ,,,,..4Z.P--24-Z-/../_.' .-77/-2-' Ti-171 . ,4 " .. - "—k r"^I'll',...'?7c42-i.;it,/ '6'-.4 . ,IY121: :t-TZ: l'zi'l t: •,. I • P, , .4?_. ii 'i ,,...,...._. ,;L:/3...4.j',.... s nol 0 ': nt 1.4/ l'CI- -• • 4,, ,,,,,Ald /V.E. . ....: ...'• . -\ '' ' 161,-,.7.5.- -r'''' '(•111;i: ) bC1:-: Lcjj nrrik ... 7..-Z3,1-1,-,,_„.____ • . .. r-- I • Environmental Review Committee Staff Report Sunset Gardens Page2 February 28, 1990 • Environmental Health 1. That the applicant site all residential structures a minimum of eighty (80) feet to the east of the Puget Power Lines, in order to protect residents against environmental health impacts from electromagnetic fields. Natural Environment 2. That the applicant: a) provide a fully approved'-tree preservation/landscaping plan in advance of issuance of site preparation/building permits; b) refrain from tree cutting until - preservation and landscaping plans have been approved and a vegetation management permit has been obtained. Traffic: 3. That the applicant reconstruct a • portion northbound Aberdeen Avenue to widen the roadway so that through traffic is not impeded by vehicles turning left into the project site. All specific improvement and reconstruction plans are subject to approval by the Public Works Department in advance of the issuance of site preparation/building permits. ,, ' At the time of building permit review, ' the applicant will need to provide standard off-site improvements (e.g. curbs, sidewalks, gutters, street lighting).' Storm Drainage 4. That the applicant provide: a) a storm drainage management system, including (including 25/2 year collection/retention basin, biofiltration and oil/water separation); and b) a drainage release (easement) from the downstream property owner or an alternative means of transporting the drainage over the property to the drainage basin. Plans should be subject to approval by the Public Works Department in advance of issuance of site preparation/building permits.. Public Service: 5. That the applicant provide a renewal extraordinary police services performance bond in the amount of $3,075.00, which shall be in effect for a minimum of three,years and be subject to approval by the City Attorney, in advance of issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy; this bond will be extended , for an additional three year period following each,occasion on which money is drawn from the bond or'the project'changes ownership. Construction 6. That the proponent provide: a) an erosion control plan; h) a plan for wheel-washing of construction vehicles; c) a plan for periodic watering down of the site; d) a plan for hauling routes and hours of operation; e) a plan for right-of-way and on-site signage to . T. s: i 'Environmental Review Committee Staff Report • Sunset Gardens . Page 3 ,, February 28, 1990 .. • facilitate any necessary emergency . services during construction . . procedures; and f) a renewable cash bond for street clean-up in the amount of$2,000.00. These plans should be approved by the Public Works Department, Fire Prevention Bureau, . Police Department, Planning Division . ,• •� and Building Division in advance of issuance of site preparation/building . • permits. • In addition staff request: . . Recreation 1. That the applicant make a voluntary contribution of$9,000.00 ($150 per unit x 60 units) for improvements to . • area public recreation facilities. Note #1:At the time of site plan review,.in order to achieve compliance with the , Site Plan Review Ordinance, some modifications to plans for,structural design • (residential units, recreation areas, carports)will be recommended --including but. • not limited to provision of thematic integrity, selection of wood siding rather than . vinyl; the addition of pedestrian walkways throughout the site, and to link the site to . the Master Trail On the Puget,Power right-of-way;relocation of the dumpsters so that they are convenient, .but do not disturb view corridors. Revisions.will also be • . recommended to the landscaping plan (e.g. retention of additional trees at the• • . ,perimeter of the site, increase in size, number and type of new plantings, contained shrubs at entryway), to the lighting plan (to direct lighting to limit glare to.adjacent , sites) and for screening at the north, east and south perimeters and at the western boundary of that portion of the site which.is to be developed, so that persons do not . intrude into the sloped area and either sustain injuries or damage the greenbelt. , Other improvements, such as interior insulation and landscaping maintenance bonds will also be required. Board of Public Works-authorization will be necessary prior to construction of any roadway at a grade equal to or greater than eight per ' cent.° The proponent will also be encouraged to introduce design elements on this ' site which serve to identify Sunset Gardens as a separate and distinct development • from nearby Sunset Downs Apartments. Note #2: At the time of site plan approval/issuance.of building permits the applicant will need to.provide an easement (recorded with King County and filed • with the City of Renton) ensuring secondary access to the site for the life of the project via the property (Lot #8) on the.southern boundary of Lot #9. The access must be gated and signed so that it is restricted for use as an emergency access; • B : •I�,�.�' UES >>> < < < < > >> is> >> < < >> << � ` < > (ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS) 1. Whether the proponent has adequately identified and addressed the following anticipated environmental impacts? - . a. Earth . • • Impact: The major portion of the subject property includes generally flat . ' ' and gently sloped (maximum 15%) terrain, A portion of the western side of the site is sloped between 15% to 25%; this portion is slated,to be retained • with existing native vegetation, and development density has been adjusted to reflect the presence of the sloped area. . . Mitigation Measures: None required. � • • Policy Nexus: .Not applicable. • • . b. Land Use/Housing . ' , . Impact: The property proposed for development appears to be well-suited for residential use, as it zoned for R-3 development and is so designated on , •• i Environmental Review Com.m.ittee Staff Report -1 Sunset Gardens • Page 4 February 28, 1990 - - the-Comprehensive Plan. It is an in-fill site essentially surrounded by multi- family and single-family development. It is convenient to arterial roadways, public transportation, schools, employment and shopping areas. Adequate infrastructure and public service resources are available to serve the proposed complex. - Both the Comprehensive Plan and recent market analyses indicate that the northeast area of Renton,where this site-is located, is appropriate and desirable for multi-family development. An existing single-family home will be demolished. Mitigation Measures: None required. . .. Policy Nexus: Not applicable. - S c. Aesthetics ' Impact: The proposed development includes a 60 unit apartment complex (estimated to house approximately 108 persons), carports and open parking, -recreation areas for children and adults (including a congregate center), and service areas. The development, as planned, is generally consistent with Code requirements for R-3, medium density, multi-family residential development, such as density, setbacks, and building heights. At the time of site plan approval, staff will recommend that thematic integrity be established for all structures (e.g. residential units and carports), that cedar siding be,provided rather than vinyl siding to assure that exterior materials on the site are both attractive and durable, that improved pedestrian linkage be provided within,the site and to adjacent Aberdeen Avenue (See Section"f'below), that the exterior lighting plan be revised to provide more complete illumination of the site while reducing glare to nearby site, and that dumpsters be relocated so that they are conveniently sited, but away from view corridors. Revisions will also be"recommended to the landscaping plan to retain more existing trees on the site, and to increase .the number, size and diversity of new plantings. Staff note that the proposed development is very similar in design and presentation to a neighboring development. While this similarity is acceptable, staff would encourage design improvements on this site which serve to identify Sunset Gardens as a separate and distinct development from . Sunset Downs. Mitigation Measures:' None required in conjunction with environmental review. Some'revisions -- as described above --will be recommended at the time of site plan review. Policy Nexus: Not applicable. ' d. Natural Environment ' Impact: As noted previously,in this report, the site is essentially vacant, with a substantial number of significant trees. A tree inventory has been provided which indicates that a considerable number of trees will be retained on that portion of the site which is slated for development; no trees are planned to be removed from the sloped portion of the site. On that sectim of the site which is to be improved, some additional tree retention will be required as well as new landscaping to enhance the natural environment and for aesthetic improvement. The proponent will be required to obtain approval for the landscaping plan at the time of site plan approval. No tree cutting • will be permitted on that portion of the site which is sloped at.greater•than 15%; no tree cutting will be allowed at any location on the site without , approval by the Landscape Planner and permits must be obtained for all tree cutting as required by the Tree Cutting and Land Clearing Ordinance. • The steep slope (greenbelt) on the west side of the property poses a potential hazard to children playing in the vicinity. At the time of site plan review, staff will recommend that wood fencing be installed along the slope boundary to protect against accidents to persons or damage to the sloped area. 5 Environmental Review Lommittee Staff Report Sunset Gardens Page 5 . February 28, 1990 i Mitigation Measures: That the applicant: 1) provide a fully approved tree , preservation landscaping plan in advance of issuance of site preparation/building permits; 2) refrain from tree cutting until preservation ' and landscaping plans have been approved and a vegetation management , permit has been obtained. Policy Nexus: Environmental Review Ordinance; Tree Cutting and Land Clearing Ordinance. e. Environmental Health - Impact: Puget Power Lines exist parallel to and immediately west of the site. Puget Power has indicated possible plans to increase the present 55 kvw lines to 115 kvw and/or 230 kvw within the next five years. Studies by the U.S. Department of Energy (U.S. DOE) and other organizations indicate potential health problems for persons living or working close to these power lines. At present, the U.S. DOE has recommended that no dwelling units be located closer than forty,(40) feet for°these lines and eighty (80) feet if power generation is 230 kvw. The proponent will be required to design the proposed development to comply with that U.S. DOE recommendation.' Mitigation Measures: That all residential structures be sited a minimum of eighty (80) feet to the east of the Puget Power Lines. Policy Nexus:,Environmental Review Ordinance; WAC 197-11-960 (Environmental Health). . f. Traffic Impact: The proposed development is estimated to generate approximately 365 ADWVTE. Both a traffic,study provided by the proponent and an analysis conducted by Traffic Systems Division indicate that anticipated off- site impacts to adjacent rights-of way (from this development and from related cumulative development) can be addressed by standard off-site improvements•and additional selected modifications to the roadway to facilitate efficient movement of through traffic. Off-site improvements should also serve to provide safe, efficient pedestrian travel routes. On-site vehicle travel routes are depicted as being up to ten per cent (10%) in grade; these roads will need to be approved by the Board of Public Works. On-site pedestrian linkages will also need to be expanded to serve all structures (residences, recreation areas, service and'parking areas), and to link the development with Aberdeen Avenue. Mitigation Measures: That the applicant: 1) provide standard off-site improvements (e.g. curbs, sidewalks, gutters,,street lighting); and 2) - reconstruct a portion northbound Aberdeen Avenue to widen the roadway so that through traffic is not impeded by vehicles turning left into the project site. All improvement and reconstruction plans are subject to approval by the Public Works Department in advance of the issuance of site preparation/building permits. At the time of site.plan review, the-.applicant will be required to: 1) redesign pedestrian walkways to improve linkage between residences and service/recreation areas on the site, and to provide safer, more efficient access to Aberdeen Avenue; and 2) to obtain Board of Public Works - approval for all portions of the on-site roadway which exceed an eight per cent (8%) slope. 5 r; • Policy Nexus: Environmental Review Ordinance; Building•Regulations; WAC. 197-11-960 B.14. g. Light, Glare and Noise Impacts:The proposed project is anticipated to generate some light, glare and noise as a result of development characteristics, such as exterior lighting and location of travel routes/parking areas, and as a result of ordinary activities by residents -- e.g. use of recreational areas. Environmental Review CbThmittee Staff Report Sunset Gardens Page 6 February 28, 1990 Design and location of buildings, parking areas and recreation areas on the site are intended, in part, to mitigate light, glare and noise impacts. Landscaping plans and exterior lighting plans similarly, have been designed and/or will be recommended to be designed to mitigate light and glare. Mitigation Measures: None required in conjunction with environmental review; minor modifications to landscaping, lighting and screening plans will , be'required in,conjunction with site plan review. Policy Nexus: Not applicable. h. Public Services/Utilities -Impact: Public services (e.g. fire,police, utilities) are generally adequate, or can be readily upgraded with standard improvements (e.g. hydrants, secondary access, utility lines) to serve the proposed development. Based upon the proposed substantial number of units for this project and the significant amount of residential development in the area, an extraordinary police services bond will be required to mitigate impacts from extraordinary levels of service which might be necessary for this development. The proposed'secondary access via property to the south should be secured by an easement for the life of the project; that access should be gated to discourage use by commuters and to prevent trespassing. School facilities are available for the 15 school-aged children who are estimated to live in this complex. On-site recreation areas may require some minor modifications, at the time of site plan review, to ensure that adequate, safe amenities are available/conveniently located for use by children and adults. Staff will recommend a voluntary contribution to off-site public recreational facilities, and a linkage to the planned nearby Master Trail, in conjunction with environmental review. • Storm water management plans will heed to be designed to include an on site collection system which is structured to flow into the North Renton drainage basin. Public Works staff are,generally supportive of conceptual plans submitted to date; some modifications to design /systems specifications may be required. Additionally a plan for transporting drainage over the property (e.g. a drainage release from Puget Power) must be obtained. Mitigation Measures: 1) That the applicant provide an extraordinary police services performance bond in the amount of$3,075.00 (this bond will be extended for an additional three year period following each year in which money is drawn front the bond,,subject to approval by the City Attorney, in advance of issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy; 2) That the applicant provide a storm drainage management system, including (including 25/2 year • collection/retention basin, biofiltration and oil/water separation) and a drainage release (easement) from the downstream property owner or an alternative means of transporting the'drainage over the property to the drainage basin,,subject to approval by the Public Works Department; 3):That the applicant provide a pathway linking the site with the planned Master Trail along the Puget Power corridor; and 4) That the applicant make a voluntary contribution of$9,000.00 ($150 per unit x 60 units) for improvements to area public recreation facilities. . Policy Nexus: Environmental Review Ordinance, Comprehensive Parks Plan, Building Regulations, Comprehensive Utilities Plans. i. Construction Impact: Standard construction impacts (e.g. erosion, noise, dust and debris, traffic) are anticipated in conjunction with the development of the proposed residential complex..These impacts can be mitigated by the,Customary measures, as listed below. ' Mitigation Measures: Staff recommend that the proponent be required to provide: 1) an erosion control plan; 2) a plan for wheel-washing of construction vehicles; 3) a plan for periodic watering down of the site; 4) a plan for hauling routes and'hours of operation; 5)'a plan for right-of-way and on-site signage to facilitate,any necessary emergency services during Environmental Review Committee Staff Report Sunset Gardens Page 7 - 'February 28, 1990 • construction procedures; and 6) a cash bond for street clean-up in the - . amount'of$2,000.00. • Policy Nexus: Environmental Review Ordinance; WAC 197-11-960 B_.1; B.2; B.3; B.4; B.7. • S .1. That the applicant site all-residential structures a minimum of eighty (80) feet to the east of the Puget Power Lines, in order to protect residents against environmental health impacts from electromagnetic fields./ 2. That the applicant: a) provide a fully approved tree preservation landscaping plan in advance of issuance of site preparation/building permits; b) refrain from tree cutting until,preservation • and landscaping plans have been approved and a vegetation management • permit has been obtained. . • 3. That the applicant: a) reconstruct a portion northbound Aberdeen Avenue to widen the roadway so that through traffic is not impeded by vehicles turning left into the project site; and b) provide standard off-site improvements (e.g. curbs, sidewalks, gutters, street lighting). All specific improvement and reconstruction plans are subject to approval by the Public Works Department in advance of the issuance of site preparation/building permits. 4. That the applicant provide: a) a storm drainage management system, including (including 25/2 year collection/retention basin, biofiltration and oil/water separation); and b) a drainage release (easement) from the • downstream property owner or an alternative means of transporting the drainage Over the property to the drainage basin. Plans should be subject to approval by the Public Works Department in advance of issuance of site preparation/building permits.. - , 5. That the applicant provide an extraordinary police services performance • bond in the amount of$3,075.00, subject to approval by the City Attorney, in advance of issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy; this bond will be extended for an additional three year period following each occasion on which money is drawn from the bond. _ 6. That the proponent provide:'a) an erosion control plan; b) a plan for wheel-washing of construction vehicles; c) a plan for periodic watering down of the site; d) a plan for hauling routes and hours of operation; e) a plan for right-of-way and on-site signage to facilitate any necessary emergency . services during construction procedures;.and f) a cash bond for street clean- •up in the amount of$2,000.00. These.•plans should be approved by the Public Works Department, Fire Prevention Bureau, Police Department, Planning Division and Building Division inadvance of issuance of site preparation/building permits. • . In addition staff request: 1. That the applicant make a voluntary contribution of$9,000.00 ($150 per unit x 60 units) for improvements to area public'recreation facilities. Note #1: At the time of site plan review, in order to achieve compliance with the . Site Plan Review Ordinance, some modifications to plans for structural.design • (residential units,-recreation areas, carports)will be recommended -= including but not limited to provision of thematic integrity, selection of wood siding rather than vinyl; the addition of pedestrian walkways throughout the site, and to link the site to the Master Trail on the Puget Power right-of-way; relocation of the'dumpsters so• • that they are convenient, but do not disturb view corridors. Revisions will also be. recommendedto the landscaping plan (e.g. retention of additional trees at the perimeter of the site;increase in size, number and type of new.plantings, contained shrubs at entryway), to the lighting plan (to direct lighting to limit glare to adjacent sites) and for screening at the north, east and south perimeters and at the western Environmental Review committee Staff Report Sunset Gardens Page 8 February 28, 1990 boundary of that portion of the site which is to be developed, so that persons do not intrude into the sloped area and either sustain injuries or damage the greenbelt. Other improvements, such as interior insulation and landscaping maintenance bonds will also be required. Board of Public Works authorization will be necessary prior to construction of any roadway at a grade equal to or greater than eight per cent. The proponent will also be encouraged to introduce design elements on this site which serve to identify Sunset Gardens as a separate and distinct development from nearby Sunset Downs Apartments. Note #2: At the time of site plan approval/issuance of building permits the applicant will need to provide an easement (recorded with King County and filed with the City of Renton) ensuring secondary access to the site for the life of the project via the property (Lot #8) on the southern boundary of Lot #9. The access must be gated and signed so that it is restricted for use as an emergency access. D; .:: COIVINIENTS:<OFREVIEVVING::DEP:ART1v1 � .nt e V:anous::Ci::de :artments::hav:e:;reviews:c� andcornxnet...: ... :...:::..:::..::.::::.:.: .:::.::....:. • • • • • • • • BEGINNING OF FILE FILE TITLE S k°b � 00 •E-90 SA-00G-90 db• .4 ", CITA. OF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works Department Earl Clymer, Mayor Lynn Guttmann,Administrator September 3, 1991 E. Dennis Riebe Riebe and Associates 11808 Northup Way, Suite W-360 Bellevue,Washington 98005 RE: Sunset Gardens Apartments Dear Mr. Riebe: This letter is written in response to your letter of August 23, 1991, requesting approval for changes to the mail boxes and to the recreation areas for the Sunset Gardens Apartment complex. 1) Mail Boxes The City continues to prefer the previously approved location for the mail box. In order to address the postal service concerns, it would be considered to be appropriate to provide reserved parking for the mail carrier(e.g. designate one of the approved parking spaces near to the mail boxes for this purpose). If the postal service is not amenable to this (or an alternative) solution, postal officials will need to notify the City by letter, including code citations which necessitate revisions to the box location plan. 2) On-site Recreation Areas/Amenities Staff is supportive of the addition of trellises throughout the site. Staff agree that the proposed "rose garden"and outdoor exercise area are attractive amenities and would support the inclusion of these modifications on the site, in addition to the children's recreation area. The removal of the children's play area is considered by staff to be a change of significant magnitude, requiring new review by the Hearing Examiner (4-31-33). Such a review could not likely take place until December 1991. Staff would not be likely to recommend to the Hearing Examiner in favor of adding these improvements if they are intended to replace the children's recreation area. The City calls for on-site recreation areas for children because: 1) the law requires that residential complexes permit tenants with children; 2) there is a reasonable possibility that children may live within the complex in the immediate and/or distant future; and 3) SEPA Rules require the City to provide mitigation for the life of a project. We would be pleased to work with you to make modifications to the approved site plan, as necessary, to ensure that the project remains viable. If you have questions or require additional information please contact Donald Erickson, Zoning Administrator, at 277-5582; I will also be available to work with you after September 13, 1991. Sincerely, Lenora Blauman Project Manager 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 17Z=, :fi,_ — =.- PLANNING DIVISION August 23, 1991 CITY OF RENTON Ms. Lenora Blauman AUG 2 7993 City of Renton Planning Department E � D 200 Mill Avenue Renton, Washington 98055 Re: Sunset Gardens Apartments Dear Lenora, Last week we were visited on the site by the local postal official. This official feels that the city approved location of the mailboxes on site will cause too much difficulty for the post office delivering mail. The postal officials are concerned that the distance for the mail carrier to walk, approximately 30', is too great a distance. They are also concerned that by walking this distance during inclement weather the mail may potentially get wet. Attached is an overlay on the approved site plan which illustrates a mail kiosk location that does meet with the postal inspector's approval. The additional complication that this revision causes is the requirement that a socializa- tion/congregation area be provided on site. Attached is design concept that the owner is very excited about and I feel will satisfy the need for a socialization area. With the project being marketed with a garden atmosphere, we are proposing the provide a "rose garden" atmosphere with the addition of trellises and benches along meandering walkways that lead to a common destination that consists of an outdoor exercise area with exercise equipment and a picnic area complete with a barbecue and picnic tables. This area will replace the tot lot area. We have discovered thru the marketing of our recently completed Sunset Downs project, consisting of 37% 3 bedroom units that no children are on site and the residents chose an outdoor exercise area over a tot lot for their outdoor recreational use. We feel that a similar need will exist in this project and therefore request consideration of this change in recreation area uses. If this design concept meets with your approval we will proceed with revising the construction documents and will formally submit for this revision and go thru the necessary process. Thank you for your consideration of this matter. Should you need any further information at this time or should you have any questions regarding the design intent proposed, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, ,.......s---&x. 6 ..... , - E. Dennis Riebe AIA ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING 11808 NORTI-IUP WAY, SUITE W-360, BELLEVUE, WASHINGTON 9800 PHONE: (206)889-9653 FAX: (206)827-4696 41) 4$w CITY F RENTON Hearing Examiner Earl Clymer, Mayor Fred J.Kaufman June 6, 1990 • Dennis Riebe, Architect 11808 Northrup Way, Suite 360 Bellevue, WA 98005 RE: Sunset Gardens File No. SA-006-90 Dear Mr. Riebe: The Examiner's Report regarding the referenced application which was published May 22, :1990 has not been appealed within the 14-day period established by ordinance. Therefore, this matter is considered final and is being transmitted to the City Clerk this date for filing. ' Please feel free to contact this office if further ass . stance or information is required. Sincerely,, 2)444e, j5" 1-c4/4---He_fe, )//c;p FRED J. KAUFMAN HEARING EXAMINER FJK:dk cc: City Clerk Building Division Planning Division inn w,r:n - P ntnn Waehinatnn 9RO55 - (2061 235-2593 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING STATE OF WASHINGTON ) )ss. County of King ) DOTTY KLINGMAN , being first duly sworn, upon oath, deposes and states: That on the 22nd day of May , 1990 affiant deposited in the mails of the United States a sealed envelope containing a decision or recommendation with postage prepaid, _addressed to the parties of record in the below entitled application or petition. Xt(), SUBSCRIBED AND , SWORN to before me this o2- day , of 1990. . Notary • blic in apd for theState of Washington, residi wUy -t Kin _ t� , therein. .5 Application, Petition, or Case #: SA-006-90 - SUNSET GARDEN, LIMITED PARTNERHSIP (The minutes contain a list of the parties of record.) -- f , May 22, 1990 OFFICE OF THE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND DECISION • APPLICANT: SUNSET GARDEN, LIMITED PARTNERSHIP File No: SA-006-90 LOCATION: I , 909 and 951 Aberdeen Avenue NE SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Site Plan approval for a 60, unit multi-family residential complex on 2.6 acres, zoned for R-3 development. SUMMARY OF ACTION: Planning Division Recommendation: Approval, with conditions. PLANNING DIVISION REPORT: The Planning Division Report was received by the Examiner on May 1, 1990 , PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Planning Division Report, examining available information on file with the application, and , field checking the property and surrounding area,)the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: MINUTES The hearing was opened on May 8, 1990 at 9:00 A.M. in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. The following exhibits were entered into the record: Exhibit #1 - Yellow File containing application, proof of posting and publication and other documentation pertinent to this request. Exhibit #2 - Vicinity Map Exhibit #3 - Contour Map Exhibit-#4 - Site Plan Exhibit #5 - Landscape Plan The hearing opened with a presentation of the staff report by MARY SAVELA, Assistant Planner, who entered the following information into the record. The site involved is 2.6 acres in size with a zoning designation of R-3 (which wquld permit 65 units), but due to sloped areas, greenbelt and power lines, the applicant has reduced they density to 60 units. There are proposed to be six structures to house the proposed 60 units"with an approximate increase in population of 108 persons (which includes approximately 15 school-age children). Currently there are two single family residences and other accompanying buildings located on the site which are in such poor condition they will be demolished before the new development begins. Ms. Savela reviewed. the ERC conditions which require the applicant to site structures a minimum of eighty feet to the east of the, power lines; provide a tree preservation/landscape plan; reconstruct a portionl of northbound Aberdeen Avenue; provide a storm drainage management plan; pay an extraordir ary police services performance bond; and submit plans to cover wheel-washing of construction vehicles, erosion control, periodic watering down of the site, on-site signage for emergency services, a street clean-up bond, and a plan for hours of operation and haul routes. Staff has also requested that the applicant contribute to area public recreation facilities. Continuing, Ms. Savela referred to the gazebo to be located on the western portion of the site (to be - included as a part of the trail system). It is anticipated this completed proposal will generate 360 vehicle trips per_day; the proposal conforms to the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan;.the development theets existing land use regulations for density, height, bulk and setbacks. Staff has recommended modifications to the structural plans for the residential units and recreational areas. She said staff felt the city has a need for this type of housing in the city; measures are being taken to l • Sunset Garden Limited Partnership SA-006-90 May 22, 1990 Page 2 mitigate impacts to surrounding properties and uses with revisions to the landscaping, lighting plan, and the provision of additional screening. Design standards will be modified to bettier distinguish this complex from surrounding units - especially•during inclement weather when additional traffic may be added on-site by visitors looking for an address: To assist in mitigating impacts to the site the proposal will address aesthetics, natural environment including greenbelt, slopes and recreational areas. Preserving views has been addressed; area-wide property values will not be effected; traffic should not be impacted with the mitigating measures imposed by the ERC; there will be on-site recreation for. adults and children; screening of patios and dumpsters will be approved by staff. The applicant will provide pedestrian circulation on-site, with the city requesting 48 inch wide pedestrian walkways; there will be mitigating measures to address construction noise; adequate air and light are provided, and there should be no neighborhood deterioration or blight. Ms. Savela read the recommended conditions by staff which included compliance with the ERC conditions; revised site plan; revised landscape plan; plan for insulation of units to ambient level of 50 lBA; the applicant submitting a Native Growth Protection Easement to run with the land; and the provision of an easement ensuring secondary access to the site for the life of the project via Lot #8,on the south, said access to be gated and restricted to emergency access only. Responding for the applicant was DENNIS RIEBE, Architect, 11808 Northrup Wav, Suite 360, Bellevue, 98005. Mr. Riebe acknowledged concurrence with staff recommendations and modified plans will be provided for staff's review. Riebe stated the buildings have been set back 80 ft. from the power line which was recommended when the rezone of the property took placer in 1989; in the 80 ft. setback the applicant is requesting permission to put in a gazebo to be used as passive recreation and to also serve as a terminus hub to the trail which will later tie into the sunset trail corridor. The exact location of the trail is to be coordinated with the city planning staff during the finalization of the plans; fire emergency access will be provided through the adjoining lot #8 to the south; project identification will be completed with signs to distinguish this project from their neighbor, Sunset Downs, and with the help of other aesthetics and Mr. Riebe felt confident (for purposes of identification) the unique differences between this project and Sunset Downs will be very evident. He said congregate areas are to be located on the eastern portion of the site; asked that they be permitted to retain the requested vinyl siding for the buildings; referenced colored renderings showing elevations, color schemes of the buildings and the changing roof lines. Pedestrian walkways will be provided on- site and access will be off Aberdeen; dumpsters will be totally screened and he will work with staff to determine the best location for same; landscaping will be upgraded; measures will be taken to protect the greenbelt, and preservation of natural vegetation is a high priority. In conclusion Mr. Riebe noted the applicant is aware they must address the Board of Public Works for authorization to work in areas on the site that have grades greater than 8%. He felt sidewalks could be provided that would meet the requirements for handicapped access. He had no further comments. WILLIAM GOODNER 848 Sunset NE, Renton, resident, stated he has lived in his home for 38 years and expressed concern about traffic at the 9th and Aberdeen corridor as well as the school.children using that corridor. Safety is the issue, and Mr. Goodner questioned whether or not the city could in some way make provisions for the children by redirecting the money requested for recreation toward, the installation of a'traffic signal at that dangerous corridor. The Examiner called for further testimony regarding this project. There was no one else wishing to speak, and no further comments from staff. The hearing closed at 10:15 A.M. FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & DECISION: Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: 1. The applicant, Sunset Garden, Limited Partnership, filed a request for approval of a site plan for a 60 unit multiple family apartment complex. 2. The yellow file containing the staff report, the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) documentation and other pertinent materials was entered into the record las Exhibit #1. 3. The Environmental Review Committee (ERC), the City's responsible official, issued a Declaration of Non-Significance (DNS) for the subject proposal. • 4. The subject proposal was reviewed by all departments with an interest in the matter. r 0 5. The subject site is located at 909 and 951 Aberdeen Avenue N.E. just west of the intersection of Sunset Boulevard N.E. and Aberdeen Avenue N.E. and just north of berdeen's intersection with N.E. 9th Street. • Sunset Garden Limited Partnership - SA-006-90 May 22, 1990 Page 3 6. The site was initially annexed to the city with the adoption of Ordinance 1795, enacted in October, 1959. The site received it's current zoning, R-3 (Medium Density Multiple Family), with the adoption of Ordinance 4229, enacted in August, 1989. t' 7. The map element of the Comprehensive Plan designates the area in which the subject site is located as suitable for the development of medium density multiple family development, but does not mandate such development without consideration of other policies of the Plan. 8. The neighborhood is in transition to multiple family apartments from a neighborhood of single family homes. Both north and south of the subject site are apartment complexes generally developed in the newly emerging R-3 district. Single family homes predominate east of the site across both Aberdeen and Sunset. On the east side of the Aberdeen/Sunet demarcation the R- 1 district is quite extensive covering a large number of blocks in all directions. 9. I-405 and the Puget Power transmission line are located west of the site. Two power lines are located in the corridor between the site and I-405. These lines carry 55 kV. They will be expanded to carry'anticipated rates of 115 kV, with possible upper limits of approximately 230 kV. The ERC imposed a minimum setback of 80 feet from these lines to protect the public health. 10. The site is served by city water and sewer lines. Storm water is conveyed across the site to the hillside above the power line corridor and I-405. Puget Power will have to approve the disposition of storm water across its site. 11. The subject site is roughly rectangular. The property is 200 feet wide by approximately 537.26 to 590.94 feet deep. The western property line runs slightly northwest to southeast and is approximately 207.08 feet long. The Aberdeen frontage is the 200 foot long eastern property line. 12. The elevation of the subject site varies from approximately 205 feet along the Aberdeen frontage (east) to approximately 100 feet at the northwestern corner of the site. The slopes, while modest along the eastern half of the site'(less than 20%), begin to drop to a moderately steep slope toward the west and may exceed 25% in the northwest corner. The steep western slope contains tall Fir and Maple trees. 13. A geotechnical report conducted for the recently approved rezone request demonstrates that the site can support construction on the steep slopes. 14. The site would generate approximately 360 average daily trips, with approximately 31 A.M. peak hour trips and approximately 38 P.M. peak hour trips. Staff review indicates that the streets in the area can handle this additional traffic. Neighbors are concerned that traffic entering and exiting the site may interfere with the various intersections Ithat are close to the site including the Aberdeen/Sunset and Sunset/9th intersections. Pedestrian crossings of these streets can be difficult. The applicant has been required to widen Aberdeen to provide a safe turning lane that will not impede traffic. 15. The R-3 district permits a.density of approximately 25 units per acre. This 2.6 acre site would support approximately 65 units whereas the applicant has proposed 60 units. 16. Developing the 60 units would add approximately 15 students to the school system. It is staff's belief the school system could accommodate the additional students. The complex will consist of six separate two and a half story buildings, .a tot lot, and a gazebo. The buildings will be served by accessory parking for 105 vehicles divided between open stalls and carports. 18. The buildings are scattered about the site with Building A located parallel to the street frontage and Buildings B, C and D located centrally and arranged perpendicular to the frontage. The westernmost or rear buildings, Buildings E and F, are parallel to the rear property line. The latter two buildings are located 80 feet from the rear property to abide by the ERC determination requiring at least an 80 foot setback from the power lines. This setback will also avoid construction of buildings in the steeply sloped areas near the western end of the site. 19. The buildings will be clad in beige vinyl, with white trim and shutters. The roofs will be of a dark contrasting material. The buildings will exhibit articulations, and the roofs will be turned gabled roofs that demonstrate a stepping up and down theme. 20. The applicant has indicated that pedestrian access to the street can be provided at a grade that meets handicapped standards. Sunset Garden Limited Partnership SA-006-90 May 22, 1990 Page 4 CONCLUSIONS 1. The site plan ordinance provides a number of specific criteria for reviewing a site plan. Those criteria are generally represented in part by the following enumeration: a. Conformance with the Comprehensive Plan; b. Conformance with the Building and Zoning Codes; c. Mitigation of impacts on surrounding properties and uses; d. Mitigation of the impacts of the proposal on the subject site itself; e. Conservation of property values; f. Provision for safe and efficient vehicle and pedestrian circulation; g. Provision of adequate light and air; h. Adequacy of public services to accommodate the proposed use; The proposed use satisfies these and other particulars of the ordinance. 2. The proposed apartment complex complies with the underlying zoning, d therefore, the Comprehensive Plan which called for medium density multiple family development in this area. It also provides additional housing opportunities in a "close-in" location and broadens the range of housing choices by adding to the apartment stock in the city. 3. The approximately 23 units per acre complies with the permitted 25 units per acre specified in the R-3 zone. The proposal appears to comply with the setback and bulk provisions of the Zoning Code. The site plan review does not determine conformance to the detailed workings of the Building and Fire Codes. Conformance of those details is reviewed upon building permit application. 4. The applicant, in addition to providing the 80 foot rear yard setback, has provided 12 foot side yard setbacks to provide some separation from the adjoining apartment uses. Building A is set back from the front property line by approximately 30 feet. Most of the development is far back from the front property line and the street. The perimeter .of the site will be landscaped further reducing any impacts on adjacent property. The scale of buildings matches that of surrounding development - 2 1/2 stories or approximately 30 feet in height. 5. The applicant is providing both a tot-lot and gazebo for recreation on sie,, and a trail link to the city's trail system will probably be provided in the western greenbelt. The greenbelt will be preserved by the execution of a Native Growth Protection Easement which sets aside the steep slopes and prevents encroachment of incompatible structures. In addition, another gazebo near the front of the property will house .the mail box and provide an area for people to congregate and socialize. 6. The buildings are well-spaced around the site and generally provide view) corridors through the site both for residents of the complex, and possible adjacent development. Buildings are no closer to each other than 15 feet, and this is limited to end walls. The buildings will provide visual interest by containing modulations, decks, and gabled roofs. The buildings will be at varying elevations also adding to the visual interest of the complex. 7. The development, with the exception of adding to the'resident population and therefore, possibly greater ambient noise levels, will obviously increase the vehicular traffic along the Sunset corridor. Staff has indicated that the corridor can handle the traffic and that the applicant's widening of Aberdeen will enable traffic to flow with minimal interference along this corridor. The development should not have an adverse affect on property values in the area. 8. The applicant proposes defining the site to avoid confusion with the other apartments in the area by providing an entry sign and supplementing and altering the landscaping along its frontage. This will also assist emergency services in identifying the site. 9. The applicant has conducted a tree inventory and will maintain some of the larger specimens. Additional landscaping elements should be installed along the boundaries of the site to further Sunset Garden Limited Partnership SA-006-90 May 22, 1990 Page 5 define the site. Additional landscaping would also help to buffer the site from some of the road noise from both Sunset and Aberdeen. 10. Any portion of the roadway that exceeds the permitted grade will need further authorization from the Board of Public Works. Sidewalks will have to meet handicapped requirements. The applicant should also provide the necessary link to the Sunset trail that may run along the power line corridor. 11.; The applicant will also be providing a secondary access in conjunction with the property located to the south. This access will be gated but will provide a needed alternative entry to the site for emergency services. 12. With the exception of the storm water system, staff reports that the public infrastructure is +- sufficient to provide the necessary services for the site. Storm water is directed downslope and is currently affected minimally by the single family homes and open spaces of the site. While the applicant needs Puget Power's agreement, this city cannot intervene or require that agreement. The applicant will have to demonstrate an acceptable storm water management plan prior to the issuance of a building permit. 13. In conclusion, the proposed site plan for an additional 60 apartment units appears to serve the public use and interest. It provides additional housing choices, is "close-in" and also fills in an area with existing infrastructure rather than forcing development to rural areas. DECISION The site plan for 60 units is approved subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant shall comply with the conditions imposed by the ERC. 2. Additional landscaping shall be installed along the boundaries of the site to further define the site. 3. The applicant shall provide an area near the mailboxes for people to congregate and socialize. • 4. The applicant shall create a Native Growth Protection Easement which sets aside the steep slopes and prevents undue encroachment. 5. Any portion of the roadway that exceeds permitted grade shall need further authorization from the Board of Public Works. 6. _ Sidewalks shall have to meet handicapped requirements. 7. The applicant shall have to demonstrate an acceptable storm water management plan prior to the issuance of a building permit. 8. The applicant shall have to secure the necessary easement to permit secondary access through the property to the south. ORDERED THIS 22nd day of May, 1990. T:17--)Z1 FRED J. KA MAN HEARING EXAMINER TRANSMITTED THIS 22nd day of May, 1990 to the parties of record: Dennis Riebe, Architect 11808 Northrup Way, Suite 360 Bellevue, WA 98005 William Goodner 848 Sunset NE Renton,'Washington L Sunset Garden Limited rartnership SA-006-90 May 22, 1990 Page 6 .i TRANSMITTED THIS 22nd day of May, 1990 to the following: Mayor Earl Clymer Councilman Richard M. Stredicke Don Erickson, Zoning Administrator Lynn A. Guttmann, Public Works Director Members, Renton Planning Commission Ken Nyberg, Community Development Director Glen Gordon, Fire Marshal Larry M. Springer, Planning Manager Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Ronald Nelson, Building Director Traffic Systems Division Valley Daily News Kim Scattarella, Engineering Specialist Pursuant to Title IV, Chapter 8, Section 15 of the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 P.M. June 5, 1990. Any aggrieved person feeling, that the decision of the Examiner is ambiguous or based on erroneous procedure, errors of law, or fact, error in.judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for a review by the Examiner within fourteen (14) days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific ambiguities or errors discovered by such appellant, and the Examiner;may, after review of the record, take further action as he deems proper. An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Chapter 8, Section 16, which requires that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk, accompanying a filing fee of $75.00 and meeting other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection or purchase in the Finance Department, first floor of City Hall. The Appearance of Fairness Doctrine provides that no ex parte,(private one-on one)' communications may occur concerning pending land use decisions. This means that parties to a land use decision may not communicate in private with any decision-maker concerning the proposal. Decision-makers in the land use process include both the Hearing Examiner and members of the City Council. All communications concerning the proposal must be made in public. This public communication permits all interested parties to know the contents of the communication and would allow them to openly rebut the evidence. Any violation of this doctrine would result in the invalidation of the request by the Court. The Doctrine applies not only to the initial public hearing but'to all Requests for Reconsideration as well as Appeals to the City Council. I N J • L f � I ' L • + I I. ce C.IF•.... �.Y..ielii' Nu`.'�ywi•Lr��..,jjil W;IyN'itV'•1`Fltlr. aW--.�`.. z o� zy- (r ` R-1 .4Z'� ?� r,^ A ti l/9O _ R_3 ; : •Ar B 11 . yW ,\ ` j , . 1 1 : I, ' r( 4, . • '.::... (.•D i.... ." ' ,.\.,..------; ..-, \ - , \ 1 i • 13 C 1, .� •... / - '•'•:•..9 1° ,1 ix,j14 •S i4 ' N E _ . A f• la If jo„ : :: i \\ • kY.- .; ;'t nt ; '� •�t h , _,\• \ . iiv Vt-......`t,:lt . . a . \\!. — (0 /R. • '''' A MI44' " . MI 11 .1p ' \‘‘ '3) � (3l . > < LAMMED o Q _t,l I R-2 \ €P 56 I N r C , ., .T [n _`•_' 5 x ��\\ _1 , ': °- I-IIGNLANDS ` � 57 ,n •:i , I ' _. g_ 1•• t W�•_? , • s�_� t, ELEM'r:NTARY.. I • E iz w t,• SCHOOL • I .. •, . .k \ , •• L2,-.17:::,.3 . „ I BR ' . P- 1 _13_4 RR I i n t. T '! _f • . \\ ...6 j . iirl*. . lib , zo ‘. : ; hz a • —14 '17` o t x, ct � , z I 0 a , vs, ,` .<q i ItfRYpio \ 0.„ . I I 1, U'.. . ,. ::. \ \ . -116:3'1!.: • 1H... p-- I t 96.r C7 - E i •'Y ,,i , 0', V. \\ cc d ;:- . !.. ' tU 0 ''''''':.;''' t I \ , IP)/ 4- , ?•.1`f..3 ?..; . 'I, \'„:44_. :4,A i 7.., foi 71'.1.4.) lit . \ 3' I 11 \ A =2i - 1f—,j S1 i'- '{ 't p''° n I j — r,. a 14::'ir'•• C. / ` 7 0a � t:Z�.-pR-11 ; �35 a4 rt __i ACIFIC CAI_ \ 'i"):,I•... v P, , y�' . �71 '..r F'i ;+ �E4 r . ..,......., • \ I f I 0 72: - / C 0,, el \... '\ ,tu �� '+ S ;';\ �J.I',/•t.. ,_.., 5+ ,. m 47. 'OUNDRY. C_Q . %.-_ /i .0 �.\.,° --` - _', I^ SUNSET GARDENS • . SA;ECF-006-90 • • APPLICANT Sunset Garden Limited Partnership TOTAL AREA .2,6 acres ± • PRINCIPAL ACCESS Aberdeen Avenue •N.E. . • . • EXISTING ZONING R-3 • EXISTING USE Residential . PROPOSED USE • Multi-Family Residential • ' COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN COMMENTS Located at 909 & 951 Aberdeen Avenue NE N . •. • • Nd�l r 07 1Nh� i;,a • - \ •\`. h/� rJ0/561�5 \�.‘\'' JO - . ',; . . :: *TRammo...71.0 ,..../.6 1H: : :\ , \ . ) ' V; ,'rN2 : rokip .OA,. -ca . ., • .7. \ L � fil0.\ `` 401 ka4 ' :1'0 1 . / f 5�u .t I �;r till ,> - # ' 0,C, •1-\ • -e Go - --:-.7. • P.4 ••• 0111111041Allikl& cv • °W—RIA-_- -----, , 2...!An-, ; '.. , --.1,„5-_\,.•:----"' trgt.tlik .17101-4 .40 p• — i rI� 11 ,s 11L . il11 l, • •t, aka NIMBINP • • ,. o ,,,_ A . ii-—I .411"5111 • - '.' 0 , al. - • .., ..., _ I 1001) (2) - -,'.' Ill 1 0$9 ,.: z„.. . ••••• tig..g:Ait . ' 10CI.. 1O1/1:6riI a Nt e,E la '•., 11._ 1 . ., . kik.. 04111P16 A, Ibi.itMo • ... 00057=1 ....,,,..A.0 A \ . . . , • . . . „.. .. .. . .:0__ ,.. ., :„, . .. wig • /�.. ,w ; ..., „ IIIIIII i" inivir.11 0 . . ■ ,„,, ~ ti,- , ,. 1i. ;m/.., nu �J ./ 77..... .;,7:,.,...., • ,!IIIAI' 3 ..;----.__ T IIIIIII ri el 2:i....._____,_. -, .•.., • . :1, u' \. _ 1i: LJ ( '1 �• � !Ilili A `\t, , _ 1O3 _ . ERDEEN -.- --. :. R. AVE. o Hz rev AVE S.E.J . my. sue• -- {p o<,e ll.,b•69 SUNSET GARLL�N LTD. PARTNERSHIP DOODS ENGINEERS ,VAS T R �•;'c Con V y O� G✓,I A OLSEN /8868 SE.4TN0 sno-E) CIVIL ENGINEERING SURVEYING INC'PLANNING l ontE O.VAUGHN /SSAN/AN, WA 99027 ¢' V. A2G5-tARTH AVE.N.E.-ELATE 2C0 ' O4 APPROVED ORUCE J,AO00$ 60 UNIT APARTMENT PROPOSAL, ` ' eELLEVUE.W N.TCN eeo07 BRUCEE JC 000,Rye_ PRELIMINARY GRADING B UTILITY PLAN IRCGI eas7s77 OR 454-27A3. / I-1 • • • 5%'i,AN-f.i.,i0. ^-,:2-16-00 e- .. • -. Y27foNlcal� "�'i P• rlS GENERAL. NOTES (:),...) =1aTaf4,2 AGEFIFOWAA.414XAI • .4,-..ZCH- n''}7 m iml„� • '%iNUS_�:Wtui'o •<I^W'17?N/ 2Cs+� pt y •"�E C5.E ' 021-ITRACEP-IS To PPo/IDE �arAPAce.c.4 rIIihim 11,l�. . ��\ l.lEnr�,GIIEee-Y 4'Rc., I FAvEo SUPFPCFI; -1 Fiol: ?7EiVLA�p TII- IVo:,. ry{D IIpI��III p olFu-1 l vzw..os I I I rri..5r o.., •PU- - it;tW�:Wi:Witte 111NC1 SAY II11"11 II1111IIII0IIII H 1-IALAYAN ^ a.Mr w� '� T • FRp-1 ALL 'Tp1�'11.1n�E Gl=W II eoJrr Pr1YLU;ri s\FeN1 / U.' 5-4 r, . r� �,m c I T•w F 5 Rom. 4lT�Wa Ecc�cF Sou, !: � CCYAFhY� �1=N27 Ei/ Np' Fifo 4s6 oOF So,—ter 0. o ToP'x2IL �1-uvL F{AVE A t`IN11"IUrI of 4' IN �1®euunnlnnn'I • ire'''L-Ahv fly {.-ner,r em LAWIy AND BAD AREAS.PP(_1FIL 1 -vllh 3-WAY 'I <� r�U7 NIL•QA/ C t?n rIK 0a Er:tUPL. :I'I Ktl RNE F�G P{b z0.1'^ueu`N' /niw�cF) u1.1) .7 �' ._': :l 'I'III IIIIII, .. i�2uccINAICn/\'t4ErWPG bd c}r, ,.•1� �w�R ��- AL 1-:1Y:7 L.L'hITAFIZA/.7icTLT,AL Lh2CL ,p"- CcMNORE,GtoWN . . aR r++w•vov r :a .-NO,..- 'LL,pativc zo..)To REGENE :•:',v..«c apc POW • L eep AReA,S(�IPua DESIGN'•"�Ies 5 A 2"Dv aAa I PcuryD Fla DR • M459 PI_aNT1NQ OF SHRUBS OR GROUNpGq.Er 1�Y- AAP-IL OI'IL -LO, reAritg OP- I: 1'�'I '�{Ea rp vpOrLay �nG{`s ARE L{or urEPrne E. �1�,��Q��ll.'i gvtuvr ?�AYLn'"Ertofav t'/ {w�, .A X r d fr6 �:LNO'1-1L7 ALAYU` 'GO rI POCI-1 ZA/10. r"IOIJIH 6TWP ��I/!•Y����6111'l�•A L'Lioe FINE �,,,,'" zy3o' d �w-�-�¢.:�• '=r Kr r�,vr Are U N4 -;J _ cr`uRLw,�ry 320.112rh SW (rJ G by 1, �lun/ ilkw' T 1 < .44 ',elmsr. • 'Y eP EuILDI 6 A6 uP ro •i M 5"°" Iveref I,WA.Ii%A+IOT%4n�.)ULI A/PHELPS' 'f(LI" �f^" r n,s uvgLan/a.-- i��, arLa .TPEPf IPUf ATM To ) PCP RHG ez .® I1+'u;pLv;A/N Fi,TMfE •GA,. .. ,. ▪ eP oEI'M L'� r 6 IS E 4 1`" 1°° r1A� 1 1711141511111111111501511 ;J Wu,C.t.,ra/ra(NLL IbaL 'b Q.C.. vee eer.a+.r. Si.,�YT•ho''^••seer�aee I SYA'IEO FAR RU9 tR�Ahn TAIL ravi't-:iry . s . L ry y4 H i c+a?VXa`!Ef-:YvM 1 WhT'nUi16 nL07 • - +•wr,e.0 y EouILATEPAL.7WAVALPh AT H NE aid n 0.7f4..ao4 ova U1M-(01-.1C�ircd A•Porn 3A•o.c.. 'i,'µ2....,^^" ••••,,,. """' • ."•,"'M'"'"' P•AJyTiNCT xFIEwLE. • v▪eu` - • pPc ep FtN-jj ALL uQr:{r.+nr FN,tN[� �b1Lr%D CDNFGRrl To T1IE rmrylnun I-A,_ .TA H,�.,L -' cr4Pitch,. 4'P,1, .b••O•C�• Tree Staking Detail Shrub Planting Detail huR�°,r;aYr,En `"'s�CD gYAnealc<,N Ar�xIATTa-I or W -ee zv .a. .ovar • ro^.,,,,,...-,-Tr. a..v, ror .w.roy.,r: •THE Lgry DSCAPE'DPL..ICg1TER(rXhg JA LibI�j{gLL[5E NO11 POI L RE APDINr{sr5E L1}M1c�Est ¢ F1.NiT J8 11UIYJrySLP.ALTERI']A11V 1oflj E''''l;yys. • INiDIAFI%Cott(PPG70R Fr a,rWIirA1N ilia LAN _'ARs a UNTIL P iy ArPg2vAL BY DWNER ilia, e•Pas•1IHy W nuryluP. I £ O - . • LPltaoCAPE•(a1T11•/•LToP SI{y,,4... L-v 'PAIjr' ALL FL41-('F MATERIAL Fog-A'PFp-Ico or oHE YeAP-FPOI-I PATE of • ACCY-Pf^J1c , AI1G SENT I', IO ca ED BY Z UeeSuAL L-Ic. LONorroNS,A-I A P'p-i 1. w',8 rWNTAJNRILE PPc�PAr,,I11CWo,r1L1 L3.sir-Pa1C,.LN1V-X-APE -_ • CAA G By VIAd�1PALI r o�P-4„'le-� r-oa w,oci S THerT. 71 . \ QI��f17�Q► •fr ►�f/TfjO'T'I•:O O O O O CTOiO 9 war r wir.•••�,c„ .. . ���7,�,i,7��� O ::T: "'t=' �'(')� p �I�0 O OZP�� ��•.iiil)O'd'Mi7�, 'r. L !'r� • o .? ►dz'Ifr�00� .��-��0 O O cr�o!�Ii� �.► „t��v a►i �r °Ia°lo(vieT�i�• I°TOiO1pjOi�J:le 1' d�♦I1 ►14-01+� ° .�1�•': o��ep������% �� asr aor_m__ ira�ae�e `. , ,.,At. a4. 0 0••�,;,�.�rs111111 Div r ;a \>v °As• ►►~E a etp' <� r1 U Oj�� n ..�.•�fe-tlS ii�J 0001•r'-.• e�`;4 � /O i T - di ,'� ►A1/+04(!IF►�0) 0.16 �1f�• v,�M'e ►i !r.•��CarliV,.L !it . 70 al/ ��� 0 7 C�i, ",� ,.�J •.. •..!►�{� eC. �.y� aC, • o irk�p. ���i 1�1. 7 `�' / ,ti0'� i i 'IIUO Q�1Vl O1T•i?X. Op�0l' . C '•''. s ►tC.:AeiWage• b.� 0�..: O Qr i C •►::A/ tll / 7, 14i• !i°. G14 O O ,i=��1'7 "ram 1�• Pd i i�l�G L I I t�� (Ie Q e'p' • ili✓. ' I I • o `r �, D.I.Afil ' � �it �O o iv, 'm �V vdi oM • o J'' 111 j II ��I Op' wjivi�F/ e.... G ... .„.„,,,,, �i,••t1111) l�►00� '�.'.t*'.=;ny-:�� O�t�GI 1uf _ . iiii 11. i.1410'. %Paco) ° .� , O� a�.v r `? lljQ `AI �;�` 01 G_' •'ISi@:rw G hv�. • r.,`'D0 '00 .` '�aoff 0�1 a°h h '.•'.T. ._.l„_�:� . . .' I9'o�• �7:+• IIII� •�� .n �Ce U I' CA,°o O`� ! '� 0, `j� �' Yar La-r ei: IIII °Gt'r C .' °i�4 f • tI �:�� OaiiO .I,0 :' ' O ii4 �PA ►��ii�i«rj �6�?�Trpe.� el* �ii av11 ida0et��r�a�o�OOOOooa'7�i�r.a+i�0oo' ��6'.Oo 09CS0,1r_. �pbloco •n oO� l�41 ) �CF - =®'r Y0I.P- r ,6n ��/o° .- .s*4000000pe.. /�I Ayr�!'o�00% te9°: Ie_oe�ooe .. h;'ll .. • Nop-R-I op p,olln m,mpplu,, . 4 P Joe ` I 3 SHE Er NO ' II,IIIh L/I0,00III • • 1 I ..11;3 i II :#00il Ilimup - .___II . pf.111U1. MIMIIIII y1I IIIII`� �I Vet i- iiiiI IN ._ , .■■■■ iJJ ' '_'I illir4="ill 'tip- - ' - • .iffir_111-i---17i--------_ ---- - in . - ro11118 . 3III11 11 AMC1111111 r-- r J__.— I" J 1=1. 11. 1 • 1 y ii awn nu■ 'I_ I�<A I. I _ 11� /', i _ it\/I�(L/�a• 11 i� ^ al':. - - 1 _. f® iilljll►\ t _j IGi71GIFA (� ��`' ':1 c' (KIWI11 lifilIFffiI'' jj - _ Gc^_ I III 1 :: � i 1 I I '�' 1 I _ 11 111111 1 J 11 1I _ Ilihi l 1 E.... IINE, III ..... IIII j1111 pp Il.■.1V e I I II.■E�J�IllIth ■1■..■1111T .,... rn.ci • :L7' G■�■ ■uu i c *-1 E -.2 `����I 'MIMI 1111111 +; .II plllllll, �IIIIIII — a 1 •_ ; I. 1, ,i1� 11 1 �.� iG le 1 liiiiil )i- lli . < �- D pp■.■11 ln■■■ -- i D I Imo- f II pug I■■■■■li 0- I — :,IIIIII �-:� 1 o I1 ( �.I,, :II , �� o �1 r .0 1 "II--_� ��I;Z. ,!Iwwuur ur. in o.or, ________ILEII lall 1_ 1 lf. - .63..,_., • 1 111o1jjjtq 1111I I I :I III IIIsEl ,: — i t • 1 � 1 [tt 1I - 1 1 '' `� rli�'.11 illor _-_ 1 I• D : - `` i 1 . NMI 1 �RI , 1111111111Illit'r P1 CI °;yl • - . ci - , .■ ■ ■■ . ..I `I` ■... .. II MINIM '�'!11 i HMI . . III{ :_I II * IIIl� ul �liiui/,. :� .--� -• ■ n��, --- -� t_ i- _ m■u ■ ■ � ■ F!, E inn ■■.■. ■■■■ -4. .■ ■ .■u.:; - - I ICI I—t =M -, • _. -n 1 1 I I ]III , 7 r.r , - 1,�7/_�- _ y •.)0 11 1 8 1 . 1p /KW if i . c1 I I/29/B • •PRELIMINARY 60 UNIT APTS RIEBE & ASSOCIATES G-a2r N ,' u�H ro ARCHITECTURE • PLANN I NC LINKErb (.2f-lRhµP BUILDING PROPOSED FOR IEd6t SE M.SUM ELEVATIONS RENTON,WA 3025 I12TH AVENUE N.E. •, ISSAOLAH.wASHINGTON SOON BELLEVUE. WASHINGTON 96004 (206) 889-9653 (206) 624-1557 E.D 411'„.0[•.I,,,' ` ARCHITECT Ci • • • • • U C • >tY PROJECT NAME: MEADOW AVENUE N. REZONE PROJECT NUMBERS: ECF-106-87 • PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Application for approval to rezone approximately 4,120 square feet of property (.946 acre) from R-4, Residential-Multiple Family to R-2, Residential-Two Family to allow the future development of a duplex unit. The • • • property is located at 321 & 323 Meadow Avenue North. PROJECT NAME: SUNSET GARDENS PROJECT NUMBERS: ECF;SA-006-90 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Applicant seeks site plan approval for 60 unit Multi- family residential .complex on vacant site zoned for R-3 use. The property is located at 909-951 Aberdeen Avenue. AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION 51067 Kathleen u i o o v e r ,being first duly sworn on oath states that he/she is the Chief Clerk of the VALLEY DAILY NEWS • Kent Edition • Renton Edition • Auburn Edition Daily newspapers published six (6) times a week. That said newspapers are legal newspapers and are now and have been for more than six months prior to the date of publication referred to, printed and published in the English language continually as daily newspapers in Kent, King County, Washington. The Valley Daily News has been approved as a legal newspaper order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for DTICE OF PUBLICNGHEARING by Pe g °_NTON HEARING EXAMINER King County. A PublicRNTOaNing will ONeld by regt The notice in the exact form attached, waspublished in the Kent Edition mes Renton Hearingh ExamineriChambers at h on meeting in the Council on , Renton Edition Auburn Edition , (and not in Second Floor of City Hall, Rento,J, Was!, supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers ington, on May 8, 1990 at 9:06 a.m. to consider the following petitions: during the below stated period. The annexed notice a L' il i i L L SUNSET GARDENS ECF;SA-006-90 (:t o t i c e of Public Hearing) 1111100 Applicant seeks site plan approval for 60 unit multi-family residential complex on vacant site zoned for R-3 use.The property is located at 909-951 Aberdeen A'wenue. was published on Ai,r i 1 3 7, 1 0 Legal descriptions of the files noted above are on file in the Renton Community Development Department. The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the All interested persons to said'petitions are invited to be present at the Public Hear- sum of$ 1 6 Z') ing on May 8, 1990 at 9:00 a.m.to express their opinions. • Published in the Valley Daily News on April 27, 1990. Acct. #51067. R4108 Subscribed and sworn before me this 1 't day of `a Y 19 9 NotaryPublic for the State of Washington g residing at Auburn, King County, Washington VDN#87 Revised 4/89 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION 51067 Lynn Rainey ,being first duly sworn on oath states that he/she is the Chief Clerk of the VALLEY DAILY NEWS • Kent Edition • Renton Edition • Auburn Edition NOTICE OF Daily newspapers published six (6) times a week. That said newspapers are legal newspapers and are now and have been for more than six months prior to the date of publication referred to, printed and published Public Notice in the English language continually as daily newspapers in Kent, King ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION County, Washington. The Valley Daily News has been approved as a legal Environmental Review Committee newspaper order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for Renton,m alW Reviewvn by P g The Environmental Committee King County. (ERC) has issued a Determination of Non- Significance-Mitigated for the following pro- The notice in the exact form attached, waspublished in the Kent Edition Municipalut(s) under the authority ofg the Renton Code. The following Applicant(s) , Renton Edition xX , Auburn Edition , (and not in have completed a mitigation process: supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers SUNSET GARDENS E6-90 during the below stated period. The annexed notice a Pub 1 i c Not i C P Applicant sees siteplan approval for 60 unit multi- y residential complex on PP (Environmental Determination) R4080 vacant sitef zoned for R3 use.Theproperty is located at 909-915 Sunset. Further information regarding this action was published on April 9 1990 is available in the Community Development Department, Current Planning Division, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington, 235-2550. This Determination is FINAL. The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the There is a 14-day appeal period which will sum of$ 26 .6 0 end at 5:00 PM on April 24, 1990. Any appeal of this decision may be made to the City's Hearing Examiner, Municipal Build- ing, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton,Wash- ington. An appeal must state clearly, in Y.1 (/}f Q/L writing, why the Determination should be r �J revised and must be accompanied by a non-refundable $75.00 filing fee. Published in the Valley Daily News on Subscribed and sworn before me this 9 t h day of April 19 9 0 April 9, 1990. Acct. #51067. R4080 6#0 c Notary Public for the State of Washington residing at Auburn, King County, Washington VDN#87 Revised 4/89 • COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER - PUBLIC HEARING APPLICANT: Sunset Garden, Limited Partnership FILE NUMBER: ECF; SA-006-90 LOCATION: 909 and 951 Aberdeen Ave. N.E. A. SUMMARY AND PURPOSE OF REQUEST: Applicant is seeking to obtain site plan approval for a 60 unit multi-family residential complex on a 2.6 acre vacant site zoned for medium density (R- 3) development. B. GENERAL INFORMATION: 1. Owner of Record: Sunset Garden, Limited Partnership 2. Applicant: Sunset Garden, Limited Partnership 3. Existing Zoning: R-3, Medium Density Multi-Family 4. Existing Zoning in the Area: R-3, Medium Density Multi-Family Residential; R-4, High Density Multi-Family Residential; R-1, Single-Family Residential; and B-1, Commercial Use 5. Comprehensive Land Use Plan: Medium Density Multi-Family Residential 6. Size of Property: 2.6 acres 7. Access: Aberdeen Ave. N.E. 8. Land Use: Two single-family residences and vacant land 9. Neighborhood Characteristics: North: Multi-family residences East: Single-family residences South: Multi-family residences West: 1-405 C. HISTORICAL/BACKGROUND: Action File Ordinance Date Initial annexation --- 1795 10-7-59 Rezone to R-3 R-104-88 4229 8-18-89 D. PUBLIC SERVICES: 1. Utilities a. Water: A four inch water line runs along Aberdeen Ave. N.E. and an eight inch water line runs just south of the south boundary of the subject property. There also is a twelve inch short stub line that enters Lot #10. b. Sewer: A ten inch sewer line runs along Aberdeen Ave. N.E. c. Storm Water Drainage: No City storm drainage system serves this site. Management is achieved by drainage down slope across Puget Power property toward I-405. The applicant will need to obtain a drainage release from Puget Power to allow drainage from the site across utility company property. PRELIMINARY REPORT T ;HE HEARING EXAMINER Sunset Garden PUBLIC HEARING May 8, 1990 Page 2 2. Fire Protection: Provided by the City of Renton as per ordinance requirements. 3. Transit: This site is not served by Metro transit. 4. Schools: a. Elementary Schools: Highlands Elementary School is approximately one-half mile east of the site. b. Middle Schools: McKnight Middle School is approximately one mile northeast of the site. c. High Schools: Hazen High School is approximately two and one-half miles east of the site. 5. Recreation: Highlands Community Center is approximately one-half mile east of the site. Gene Coulon Park is less than two miles northwest of the site. E. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE ZONING CODE: 1. Section 4-31-8A, R-3 Residence District. 2. Section 4-31-33, Site Plan Review. 3. Section 4-31-35, Greenbelt Regulations. F. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR OTHER OFFICIAL CITY DOCUMENT: 1. Northeast Renton Plan, City of Renton Comprehensive Plan Compendium, 1986 (pgs. 55-60). 2. Residential Goal, City of Renton Comprehensive Plan Compendium, 1986 (pgs. 14-16). G. DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS: 1. The applicant, Sunset Gardens Limited Partnership, seeks approval to develop the subject property with a 60 unit multi-family residential complex. The property was reclassified to R-3, Medium Density Multi-Family Use, in 1989. Under the now existing designation, based upon the present Zoning Ordinance, the property could be developed to a maximum of 25 units per acre, or a maximum of approximately 65 units; however, proposed density has been reduced to accommodate sloped areas on the site as well as to locate structures at a greater distance from power lines and greenbelt areas located on the western boundary of the site. The development is proposed to include six discrete residential structures -- each of 2-1/2 stories -- with a total of six one-bedroom units, 42 two-bedroom units and 12 three- bedroom units. The development has been generally proposed/recommended to be designed, scaled and oriented in a way which .addresses development standards established in the Zoning Ordinance, as well as specific characteristics of the project site and the neighborhood. Building exteriors are planned to have vinyl siding and asphalt shingle roofing. There are recreation areas for children and adults. There are also 105 parking spaces, as required, including both open stalls and covered carports; carports are proposed/recommended to be thematically integrated with the residential structures. Approximately 108 persons, including 15 school-aged children, are anticipated to live here. An estimated 360 ADWVTE would be generated at this density. The property is presently developed with two single-family homes, and attendant accessory buildings. These are dilapidated structures which will be demolished to accommodate the new multi-family development. • 2. Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and SEPA (RCW 43.21.C, 1971, as amended), a Determination of Non-Significance - Mitigated, was issued for the project by the Environmental Review Committee on March 5, 1990, with the following conditions: PRELIMINARY REPORT T ''HE HEARING EXAMINER 'Sunset Garden PUBLIC HEARING May 8, 1990 Page 3 a. That the applicant site all residential structures a minimum of eighty (80) feet to the east of. the Puget Power Lines, in order to protect residents against environmental health impacts from electromagnetic fields. b. . That the applicant:, 1) provide a fully approved tree preservation/landscaping plan in advance.of issuance of site preparation/building permits; 2) refrain from tree cutting until preservation. and landscaping plans have been approved and a vegetation management permit has been obtained. c. That the applicant: reconstruct a portion of northbound Aberdeen Avenue to widen the roadway so that through traffic is not impeded by vehicles turning left into the project site. All specific improvement and reconstruction plans are subject to approval by the Public Works Department in advance of the issuance of site preparation/building permits. d. That the applicant provide: 1) a storm drainage management system, (including 25 year/2 day collection/retention basin, biofiltration and oil/water separation); and 2) a drainage release (easement) from the downstream property owner or an alternative means of transporting the drainage over the property to the drainage basin. Plans should be subject to approval by the Public Works Department in advance of issuance of site preparation/building permits. e. That the applicant provide an extraordinary police services performance bond in the amount of $3,075.00, approved by the City Attorney, in advance of issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy; this bond will.be extended for an additional three year period following each occasion on which money is drawn from the bond. f. That the proponent provide: 1) an erosion. control plan; 2) a plan for wheel-washing of construction vehicles; 3) a plan for periodic watering down of the site; 4) a plan for hauling routes and hours of operation; 5) a plan for right-of-way and on-site signage to facilitate any necessary emergency services during construction procedures; and 6) a cash bond for street clean-up in the amount of $2,000.00. These plans should be approved by the Public Works Department, Fire Prevention Bureau, Police Department, Planning Division and Building Division in advance of issuance of site preparation/building permits. In addition staff request: a. That the applicant make a voluntary contribution of $9,000.00 ($150 per unit x 60 • units) for improvements to area public recreation facilities. 3. Staff representatives from various departments have reviewed and commented upon the proposed project. Comments are appended and th. ir content is integrated into the report. 4. SITE PLAN REVIEW CRITERIA: Section 4-31-33 lists ten criteria that the Hearing Examiner is asked to consider along with all other relevant information in making a decision on a Site Plan Approval application. These include the following: a. Conformance with the Comprehensive Plan, its elements and policies: Multi-family residential development at the density proposed is permitted under the Comprehensive Plan designations for medium density multi-family use and Greenbelt established for this property on the Comprehensive Plan Map. In addition, the proposed development (as presented or with recommended environmental/site plan mitigation measures) is generally compatible with several of the Comprehensive Plan goals and policies established for multi-family development, including Policy IV.A.1. which calls for housing densities and types to suit a variety of family sizes, age groups, life styles and income levels; IV.A.6. which calls for a balance between housing and available access, utilities and community facilities; IV.B.3. which calls for dwellings to be designed to take advantage of views and site character; IV.C.3. calling for residences to be located near arterial streets to assure adequate access; IV.C.7. which calls for multi-family dwelling sites to achieve the same basic amenities as are generally available to single-family dwellings; IV.C.8 calling for multi-family dwellings to be located near employment and shopping centers; IV.D.3. which calls for area wide compatibility of architectural design; and IV.D.7. which calls for significant natural features to be preserved. . PRELIMINARY REPORT T-- `.rHE HEARING EXAMINER Sunset Garden PUBLIC HEARING May 8, 1990 Page 4 Also, the land development objective of the Plan's Urban Design Goal (III.A.) states that growth and development should occur in a "timely and logical progression of the existing urban area...". The policies under this objective state that priority is given • to the development of property where "vacant land is surrounded by property developed with residential uses. Public services (fire, police, schools, recreation) and utilities are generally available to the site. Finally, the Northeast Renton Plan encourages development to occur from west to east. This project is actually an infill project located in the western portion of the Northeast Quadrant area. b. Conformance with existing land use regulations: • The residential complex, as proposed and/or recommended, generally meets development standards for the R-3 Use Zone (4-31-8A), with respect to such characteristics as density, height, bulk and setbacks. Similarly, the proposed and/or recommended development conforms to requirements set in the Parking and Loading Ordinance (Chapter 4-14). Revisions will also be recommended to the landscaping plan (e.g. tree retention, upgrading of new plantings) to achieve compliance with the Land Clearing and Tree Cutting Ordinance (Chapter 4-9); and Landscaping Ordinance (4-31-34). As noted previously in this report (Section G.2), a portion of the western side of the subject site is designated as a "greenbelt". As such, the development of the site must address Zoning Ordinance "Greenbelt" Regulations (4-31-35). The development does address density reduction requirements for sloped areas and requirements which prohibit development in the power line corridor. In order to achieve compliance with the Site Plan Review Ordinance, some modifications to plans for structural design (e.g. residential units, recreation areas) will be recommended (See G.4.c./G.4.d.). c. Mitigation of impacts to surrounding properties and uses: Potential impacts to the surrounding environment and to neighboring land uses have been identified by staff in the areas of housing, aesthetics, natural environment (soil/slope stability, vegetation), traffic circulation (see G.4.f), and public services/utilities (see G.4.i). The Environmental Review Committee recommended conditions (See G.2) to address the above-defined environmental impacts (traffic, earth, natural environment, aesthetics, noise, etc.) upon surrounding properties from this development. Similarly, conditions established by the Environmental Review Committee and addressed by the applicant in conjunction with the reclassification of the property in 1989 (see Attachment A) were intended to mitigate these environmental impacts. Finally, staff recommendations made in conjunction with this site plan review are established to mitigate other significant impacts from the proposed development. 1) Housing City sponsored studies (Northeast Renton Area Plan) and privately conducted market analyses indicate that there is a need for additional multi-family housing in this sector of the City -- based upon increased employment opportunities, central location, quality of the local school system, etc. The proposed residential complex will provide 60 new units to house approximately 108 persons. Two single-family homes -- older units in poor condition -- will need to be demolished to accommodate the proposed/recommended development. Thus, this development is expected to have a positive impact on housing in this area of the community. 2) Aesthetics The applicant, working with staff, has generally endeavored to make the proposed development compatible in scale and design with surrounding existing residential (multi-family and single-family) developments. In order to fully address aesthetic impacts, however, staff will recommend some modifications to the plan. Revisions will also be recommended: a) to the landscaping plan (e.g. retention of additional trees at the perimeter of the site, increase in size, number and type of new plantings, contained shrubs at • PRELIMINARY REPORT T'' '''HE HEARING EXAMINER .Sunset Garden PUBLIC HEARING May 8, 1990 Page 5 entryway); b) to the lighting plan (to direct lighting to limit glare to adjacent sites); and c) for the addition of screening at the north, east and south perimeters. The proponent will also be encouraged to introduce design elements on this site which serve to identify Sunset Gardens as a separate and distinct development from nearby Sunset Downs Apartments. 3) Natural Environment As noted previously, the subject property includes an area on the western perimeter which is a "greenbelt" consisting of steeply sloped areas covered with natural vegetation. Conditions were established in conjunction with environmental review for the retention of the greenbelt (e.g. maintenance of slope and protection of vegetation). A Native Growth Protection Easement will be required for the greenbelt; allowed development in the greenbelt will be restricted to a gazebo and to a path linking the development with the planned Sunset Trail due west of the site. d. Mitigation of impacts of the proposed site plan to the site: Potential impacts to the surrounding environment and to neighboring land uses have been identified by staff in the areas of housing, aesthetics, natural environment (soil/slope stability, vegetation), traffic circulation (see G.4.f), environmental health (see G.4.g.), and public services/utilities (see G.4.i). As in the case of off-site impacts, the Environmental Review Committee has recommended conditions in conjunction with this review (See G.2) and with the previous reclassification (see Attachment A) to address potential environmental impacts occurring on the site. Also, staff recommendations made in conjunction with this site plan review are established to mitigate other significant impacts from the proposed development. 1) Aesthetics The site plan has been generally designed to create an ambient environment for residents. For example, the proponent has proposed that dwelling units include balconies/patios and fireplaces. The complex provides such amenities as on-site recreational areas for children and adults. The greenbelt on the west side of the site will be 'retained with natural vegetation, affording a pleasant view corridor. Additionally, landscaping throughout the site is designed to create an attractive vista for residents, as well as providing a visual/light/glare buffer for neighboring properties. In order to ensure that the complex will afford a pleasant, safe functional living environment for residents, staff established a number of conditions in conjunction with environmental review, including requirements for tree preservation/landscaping, greenbelt retention, and separation of development from the greenbelt. In order to address on-site aesthetic impacts, in addition to mitigation measures .to address off-site impacts (e.g. perimeter landscaping and screening), staff will recommend a number of conditions, including, but not limited to some modifications to structural design (residential units, recreation areas, carports). -- e.g. selection of wood siding rather than vinyl; the introduction of design elements on this site which serve to identify Sunset Gardens as a separate and distinct development from nearby Sunset Downs Apartments; provision of a congregate area; the addition of pedestrian walkways throughout the site, and to link the site to the Master Trail on the Puget Power right-of-way; screening of patios; and relocation of the dumpsters so that they are convenient, but do not disturb view corridors. 2) Natural Environment The applicant has designed the development to acknowledge the greenbelt and the rolling terrain on the developable portion of the site. Through judicious location of structures, location of recreational areas has been accomplished in a manner which utilizes site features (views, elevations) to positive advantage. PRELIMINARY REPORT TI' 'HE HEARING EXAMINER ,r Sunset Garden PUBLIC HEARING May 8, 1990 Page 6 3) Environmental Health The western periphery of the subject property is developed with Puget Power lines. These lines currently generate 115 kv of power. Future plans may include conversion of those lines to generate up to 230 kv of power according to representatives of Puget Power. The proponent has designed the project so that electromagnetic intensity to dwelling units does not exceed 100 milligaus, as stipulated by the Environmental Review Committee (Section G.4.2.). e. Conservation of area-wide property values: The proposed residential complex is not expected to have a negative impact on property values in the area since the project will result in: 1) development of the property with a viable residential use, leading to an inherent increase in property values; 2) development of a project which is proposed/recommended to be designed to complement specific features of the property (e.g. slope, vegetation); and 3) development of a project which, with implementation of staff recommendations, will be compatible with uses on neighboring properties. f. Safety and efficiency of vehicle and pedestrian circulation: 1) 'Off-site Impacts Based upon ITE Reports, staff estimated that 360 ADWVTE would be generated by the proposed development. The anticipated number of trips can be accommodated on adjacent Aberdeen Avenue and nearby Sunset Boulevard without reducing levels of service or otherwise having a significant'impact upon vehicle/pedestrian circulation, with mitigation measures established by the Environmental Review Committee and in this site plan review -- such as a left turn queueing lane. Standard on-site and off-site improvements (e.g. hydrants, curbs, sidewalks, gutters) are required for this complex. 2) On-site Impacts Applicant proposals and City recommendations for access and circulation routes on the site are also generally designed to protect pedestrian safety and to enhance vehicle circulation. Staff does note that a portion of the interior roadway is proposed to be at a ten percent grade. The applicant will need to obtain Board of Public Works authorization for this design/construction plan; such sanction is required prior to construction of any roadway at a grade equal to or greater than eight percent. Staff will recommend: 1) the addition of pedestrian walkways of a minimum of 48 inches in width, both throughout the site, and to link the site to adjacent Aberdeen Avenue (the walkways must be designed so that no path is so steep as to preclude safe pedestrian passage); and 2) improvements to lighting and signage. g. Provision of adequate light and air: The proposed development is designed so that adequate air and light circulation are provided. For example, structures are generally well-separated from one another (by an average of approximately 25 feet); where lesser separation is provided (between Buildings "A" and "B" and "E" and "F") the structures are oriented toward open spaces and view corridors rather than toward abutting structures. Similarly, structures on this site are set back from property boundaries to limit impacts on neighboring developments. h. Mitigation.of noise, odors and other harmful or unhealthy conditions: 1) Construction Construction of the proposed residential complex is expected to generate noise, dust and debris. Mitigation measures related to construction impacts PRELIMINARY REPORT ` THE HEARING EXAMINER Sunset Garden - PUBLIC HEARING May 8, 1990 Page 7 have been recommended by the Environmental Review Committee, including limited hours of operation, periodic watering of the site, erosion control and clean-up bonds. 2) Operation The proposed/recommended multi-family development is not likely to generate any noise beyond that expected from a complex which is estimated to house 108 persons. On-site noise should be contained through mitigating measures proposed by the proponent (separation of living units, location of recreation areas) and through adherence to recommendations and/or requirements for interior insulation. Sounds from the adjacent right-of-way, are anticipated to be mitigated by setbacks and by the recommended brick/masonry wall along the eastern site boundary parallel to Aberdeen Avenue. Because the site is proposed for residential use, no noxious odors or other unhealthful conditions are anticipated (except for smoke from fireplaces -- which will need to be constructed to conform with local regulations). Staff does note the presence of power lines west of the site. To ensure that residents are protected from potential power line emissions, the Environmental Review Committee has required, and the applicant has agreed, that all dwelling units be located so that no more than 110 milligaus will be transmitted to any structure. i. Availability of Public Services and facilities to accommodate the proposed use: Development of the proposed residential complex, with recommended environmental conditions (see G.2.) and site plan mitigation measures (G.4.) is not generally expected to create an undue burden on public services and facilities in the area. Additionally, future tax revenues which will be generated once the development is constructed should help to provide improvements to public services and facilities utilized by Sunset Gardens residents. For example, the Renton School District reports adequate resources to accommodate the anticipated 15 school-aged children at Highlands Elementary School (.5+/- mile east of the subject site); McKnight Middle School (1+/- mile northeast of the subject site); and Hazen High School (2.5+/- miles east of the subject site). • The proposed development includes both passive and active on-site recreation areas for children and adults. Additionally, as noted previously, the site is convenient to Renton's major public recreation areas -- Gene Coulon Park, Liberty/Cedar River Park, the , Community Center and Highlands Recreation Center. Staff has recommended that the applicant participate in the improvement of the planned Sunset Trail by providing linkage for project residents to that amenity through the greenbelt located on the west side of the site and that the applicant contribute to the improvement of local public recreation facilities. The Fire Prevention Bureau reports that resources are adequate to serve the site, assuming the customarily,anticipated number of emergency calls. Clear signage at the entry to the development and identification of residential structures, well-demarcated primary and secondary access routes and through-travel routes, and exterior lighting are recommended and/or required (pursuant to City Code) to facilitate efficient emergency service. The Police Department believes that there may be a greater demand placed on police services in the near future for residential developments in which there is inadequate attention to selection of tenants, inadequate management and/or inadequate security provisions. Police Department representatives also note,that three bedroom units (such as 'those proposed for Sunset Gardens) which house larger families, tend to generate a substantially higher number of calls than do smaller units. For these reasons, the Environmental Review Committee called for the applicant to post a performance bond to fund police service calls above those routinely anticipated -- approximately .44,calls per unit each year. Staff will also call for the applicant to provide an easement ensuring secondary (gated ) access to the site for the life of the project, via the property immediately south of the site to improve emergency service capability. Public Works Department staff report that utilities and infrastructure are generally adequate to serve the site with mitigation measures established by the Environmental Review Committee and through compliance with code requirements. PRELIMINARY REPORT T1 'HE HEARING EXAMINER Sunset Garden PUBLIC HEARING May 8, 1990 Page 8 j. Prevention of neighborhood deterioration and blight: Development of the site with a multi-family project is not expected to lead to deterioration and/or blight in the neighborhood. The project, with mitigating measures established in conjunction with environmental and land use review, should be generally compatible with other existing and anticipated developments in the area. It is hoped that residents will help contribute to the community identity, as well as help support existing and anticipated community services and businesses in the vicinity. Therefore, staff believe the proposed residential complex may, in fact, add to the value of the property in the area. H. DEPARTMENTAL RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommend that the Hearing Examiner approved the development of a multi-family residential complex by Sunset Gardens Limited Partnership, (File #006-90), with the following conditions: 1. That the applicant comply with all conditions established by the Environmental Review Committee on March 5, 1990. 2. That the applicant provide a revised site plan including: a) introduction of design elements on this site which serve to identify Sunset Gardens as a separate and distinct development from nearby Sunset Downs Apartments; b) selection of wood,siding/trim exterior materials (e.g. cedar, hardboard) rather than vinyl siding to create a more aesthetically pleasing, durable development; c) the addition of pedestrian walkways (at least 48 inches wide and sufficiently level to ensure safe passage) throughout the site to serve residential units, recreation areas, service and parking areas, as well as to link the site to the Master Trail on the Puget Power right-of-way and to link the development to Aberdeen Avenue; d) relocation and screening/landscaping of the dumpsters so that they are conveniently located, but do not disturb view corridors; e) a lighting plan which includes sufficient on-site, exterior, pedestrian-scaled lighting to illuminate the entire site (residences, service areas, parking and recreation areas), and which directs lighting to reduce glare to adjacent sites); f) the addition of screening at the north, east and south perimeters and at .the western boundary of that portion of the site which is to be developed, so that persons do not intrude into the sloped area and either sustain injuries or damage the greenbelt; g) the addition of screening for ground level patios; h) the addition of a congregate area at the mail boxes including an area sheltered with gabled roofing, seating, lighting, a bulletin board and appropriate plantings. The plans are to be approved by the City's Planning Division prior to issuance of site preparation/building permits. 3. That the applicant provide a revised landscaping plan including: a) retention of additional trees at the perimeter of the site; and b) increase in size, number and type of new plantings throughout the site (especially at entryway, perimeters, and service areas). These plans are to be approved by the City's Planning Division prior to the issuance of site preparation/building permits. 4. That the applicant provide a plan for insulation of residential units to an ambient level of 50 dBA in order to mitigate noise impacts, to be approved by the Building Division, prior to issuance of site.preparation/building permits. 5. That the applicant provide a Native Growth Protection Easement to run with the land, in accord with standards established by the Land Clearing and Tree Cutting Ordinance, in order to ensure the protection of all vegetation in the greenbelt area on the western portion of the property. This easement shall be subject to the approval of the City Attorney and shall be recorded with King County and placed on file with the City of Renton, prior to the issuance of the site preparation permits. 6. That the applicant provide an easement ensuring secondary access to the site for the life of the project via the property (Lot #8) on the southern boundary of Lot #9. The access must be gated and signed so that it is restricted for use as an emergency access. This easement shall be subject to the approval of the City Attorney and shall be recorded with King County and placed on file with the City. of Renton, prior to the issuance of the site preparation permits. NOTE: Board of Public Works authorization will be necessary prior to construction of any roadway at a grade equal to or greater than eight percent. • I i ' IUI., s ... ruY:.j 1'41Yr.w y�4YYw.,•.+IY�Yw� ..,�•w _,,:._... .<._. • \ �?_s• •,F R-1 .4Z°� 1 ?may i�• y, . 1 1 �.:. w Q.-• 40 t • 7 B 1 -10 _ y • r �. z • ,...-) \• \ R-4 • J 3 ?.a. ,,.�. fr.' \ -.:1-\ i �� o".•::: g fi. to j- r .,.. ;-----, \\ -,-, „ , . . tt •t7 • „ 7,! 1. —Y , , I C,,,, •e ; z� 5- . „\, C6 , _\ \ , itlybk • -/ L'i - '2'- ••••5 .. •• r --T'- - 5 " 74 to En •.1 '!/- ' • •\ `\\ ... (J) •/ J> ;' ;sa 7,.. „ ' rilL z i- ,�•i.�- r I- 1 I •oft iti#411x. . L \ '\ ��• '4, 13 -� ., - PL. t, to ( •- _ �� 56 N. C i. a \ 1ST =+' oHIGHLANDS `cI W : + a ELEMNTARY + C ' 1 1 .k r— ST. '' t L7 f —I. . N , •,Ti . u { SC CAL 1 j s • s i ,;� ^^ —K_ ihI'!!N, r S u ,,1 �+` ' P 1 . \ .. .6S) ' ..sals,6:-'. ' ...'-'71.----.''-i.i;,4-4-t Zig El,__, :., , u ___,..._ _. - - . .,_____,,_:,-. ..r ED) i5r rim1\\ H '+ ty •�z isf. •• °.• • A\ 'elAllilniMliond 7 M'..'.1 1.51 \. ' 4.4"t1,/ .7 . ,"." _ _ �.� ,. ' '••\y�� i i, 9S=+i .'9�1D4„T- ,, zs t: . +Q of °\,M1�t,. �b'- • Y'•� W � L°� =C l Nt Hi �L�� I • ad 1 ).•, ` •1 �i'L S j 'S • 6,er,,o /'' ' —• ,.,/ V�:��oe�z +.+ i, '= 4-i.i=��W'11 • lv © 4 ,., GVf !'r" ,. • .7*r'4)`. L- Y.T tt -" .s II',�. = Q ,. : 1 z 4 6. C i ce`+ H E I /-T �Y 4: ,,, ,.y , , O !J , CL e Y ~_ ' , t ,, n n2 I 11 I M ' N : Bess I ::' ,5 i. r , , + �� E • ' '•.^. •, '1'I ^ '^-,�.1.'_iZ1 21J= • to \ �I~ L� =yam j."I"•i I I, R " 111 .i• • / t. \ . 0 zvZ�' .o� 11 738 = t°> `' L ♦ 4GIFIG CAR_ \ ilo \ S 4. :C � 4'... ;IL N E A •, 1 3J °, 15 i iy "I! _ ' �P .. • . , " ,-i ,.r.F-,j f+ • SUNSET GARDENS •. SA;ECF-006-90 • APPLICANT Sunset Garden Limited Partnership ' TOTAL AREA .2•.6 acres ± •. • .. PRINCIPAL ACCESS Aberdeen Avenue N.E. . EXISTING ZONING R-3 EXISTING USE Residential ' . PROPOSED USE • Multi-Family Residential COMPREHENSIVE LANp USE PLAN • , . COMMENTS Located at 909 & 951 Aberdeen Avenue NE . . • . • r Cr -``'' �.'&'�y:�, .'G;'°�' •� .°fC•., r.�,. c�•,4.,. �.. Scale 1 —2 Irr■r1 ,•G..`c";y,�:....:.�•, .w\ c; ..r_,•'; •:: .`•�.°..�'...., rl:.,C✓r''r I'"I�:.r^..:y'• � lara�i +• C.t F ••ou z. c•°,%c.,, a V 3-� •C. °^—w•-•.' a•:cc .c:. �▪ '�%'• „:c° �',;,r,::'•'cr., , .4. ...,',F. .• • Ilk! I0000000r t-� ,..,,-\•• , _,„„„„„„,. ..... ,.._. ... . , , ....„... ...•.,.....„ t ",„::,::.:,: . . : . .,06 � �tij,: ,.•..• .•-J fir' __ t, ;�: lt:::::r::::::::.;:c;::rc,:°:i.c.0 111 7.-- „^}•' ' '. , r.:e.f...C. 4."I r ':Arno::..,. .. ........ ::::.„:„.::::",..,...st �; / r*Fn.‘ ..., IIP • , ..'..:4 ..,I; yi :, IJ.I o000•1 uroll • nowt! '0000o Jrr►.r. Il ul/===== \II■rrr. `` • I • • • • • A. ` �°•'::.::•;}y::'::':,:t•::Irrr■Irrl ...... 000000 , • • • • •.`� . 1.�rar/1►.r• ��, •.•• l 1•000.0.00, "f J' • • • „.1g411Is,iA1 M-r•.,t. 1 • • • • •:� � , I■arr'Irr'.1 I 00000000• ,".„° • r-••:=-__ II0000°° '• • • •� • • /rar i�rInern► - 00000.: ..' •". �r} �I �ars., 1I</IrrrAaa, 1 00,000' s S 1 • • • • • ,r r rl •r.is■■lrarr'. - 1��1 _°00000, W'+p, r • • • • • • • 1 / • • • • • • • 4... .•:I„r 4or'7.d•1:,p•i/..A ILo° o %oo w •• • •• • • • • ••.•%` M 1�4 1-t- O.1 •oo°000°000 us • • • i 'e o,. ' ,r :•.#.1•Y-• • • • • • • • • ',;, 4 1 l,r•- oo $*:• • • • • `, +f0! , � �F:•'.%%: •`:i iii. • • • • ,• o 7Iir:thoIiIj 7. .::::;::::: 711r•, .•1 •• I'lt ;'t • 71?IIfII0IP '•o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o• IarUarrr. l ' .:.. . IVI-•°00000000rrr1IIrrrl :$; • 00•0000000000owsn 0•0000000000o o a o 0 o 00 0 0 0 0 0 0000 00 •0000 O ° ° 0000 °°°.° °.° 0000 0000° °°°oo.°0000 °, `•• 4\� 000000000•0000000000 •00•� • • 11 l .IJll•rrrr Ass • -,n;3��`."• _ • ' • O 000000.000000000• O0 MEW l, ,irrrrl •\■ '. r �• �0000000•0000000000 ,;,.��'�'�• •�>.:::• 1 . o00000000000000000• s• .4 1411llrrrl :IP .-J II� ..oo : o000000 .. . Qlrllrr��' 1 .II 0000 000000000000000000o t'i:.:.::•:•;:•:• ' :o r•� allrr' ' I■1 •°ootl : o00000000000000000°. • ■rr.�'` ••Ila••, ':c' ■a ' •00000 ,:'.•••• •0000000000000000000 !n� ■rrl ..n //y •000°° o00000000 � ' :r. rrrrl isomiimilh ���� 7 •:! < L. •.00000 ' o0000• 000• • •0000•°°° .0000 ':t` 0p.� ,C •.•N p ,1 0 0000000 P _ yrt it'1% :ateain o000000 •■rallral fir•: , /• 00000 K .00 1 ••• _ ■.r..arrl••°o:•off• `,,� f.$ 'ink" :•.:;. mot: .) •:J...s. %rJ runrl '000• � .Itur► '•n[%J.' •dj.,,ti• -•'+ ' '�] �' rune 1' / / iig r : Illidf "r�f% s3. ). •.n�. fJ't • 3 . ,`; ,. '£;``' '.v. f..!'.;�•-c\ . ,.}.'�1 .J o rr �n� .£�, o:.o:r^ °CA;IF*.`?), ' , '�; -OWN, ', n,'rn :::C.•-nr,tv..'� <'.\',. rat:N., ,.' �6''_� o;?6 el^`r3 f'V,ri 6;::::-',.?.:s:.`,f:r rJ; c•• ;. ,c•• 'hem 'tea• <36�, '�•-•. '<^e.• ,.�rr■ `JJ'YS/ .'�." �r. .:r•t{ e� .mac,. ofv 'ii .°',,,,J,} .. •'•■ r�:\_ )C• J, ,•{1RP\i.T .a•.!3,'w af'c�e�',�.1.E�•J'(J 9 t to -J` d /■ .1t7,k ,.•T4 •n, ',$Zi. • .c r ,YY`'.C' '. '^ ,r-,•'„) ••!.� i .„ :• ..'cr�'a,G;�(:t p j• .y ,[i•. �nia. '. ): ,}` :to .�T[r: ^'�<'• > F`s.r .�, ,:er. " :a��i 4�n t}':^•...t j^,t' ''.�;:�°, ^tz% oC';t, >t,U r [�:' c t%;� C' r' `r ' lir` kik ,t)`b.n Y,c ,t�•.:(Pjry),,,E:;•.,,(�.r„s•?., ^� d(`•.r• `:C` •;':i `` (,j• e Lw,.".k% ' - , t'.,`•• v ..r A s-1;:1t" e, :r a " •e \\` •°0000 (v fe." •lt'(`}1:')E J,C , n.;'�a u. ,e,,^��a++r.... •_.� • ,,Et\'fitC",-. rtfi',4 }.Z^ '�`JcFt;r <`r.e „_ ,',7 .J:n,rf, 1 °Ooo°: ,,,:.•�' l,A.?, • `b)E 'nn• 'i1 t"..:. .- "'C. dh- c :1.6 -rC '-; rr ,+. �.� .•'''ok.: o ` 111.1,1 �.}•. :000 :'.<.:Ets.`'{("<,,.ii 0'e • 0 ' , :«^• *(, ;' f,.':� LAND USE ELEMENT ;,Ft •t�>} G 00000 .,Ei 00)000 (• 0 3). .. <<?- 6 :(,., ;.. 3.;��. 0000 )°° I e Family .......: Commercial .,,n:e oo nr•.'t3, S:::::%. } . •0000•.4 .`` .111..00.07. Low Density t y � Office / Office Park k �.`�.�r�'�•�. �. Multi-Family LI--4, MedMulDensity r0000 000 Public,/ Quasi-Public ulti-Family 00000•(:ri --\ 000°°° ••:: • r <>::: High Density i....... . 0 0 0 0 0 ""lij:?-c.,,-_, _ —_ ::i`' •000nn , i , �� :}ii:K: ;: Light Industrial 0000°° `� 0000° :<::r:::Y:::<••:•:•:: g d str.ial ,." 0000°°° , 0000° <::..:, y °°°OC n ::: :.:.:< Multi=Famil '� oo°00000 1 ?q J 00000 ". - ..f\e. . " :r 00000° .f,`,) _" 000°00 • �I 0000 on o°°000000 1''M Y Recreation •: �; ••••• Heavy Industrial . . / . %.i.,'?, .1 . • �; ' :�•. ' �: Greenbelt r______1 Manufacturing Park / Multiple Option CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF. NON-SIGNIFICANCE • (MITIGATED) • • ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST NO.: ECF-006-90 APPLICATION NO(S): SA-006-90 . PROPONENT: DENNIS RIEBE PROJECT NAME: • SUNSET GARDENS DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Applicant seeks site plan approval for 60 unit multi-family residential complex on vacant site. zoned for R-3 use. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: The property is located at 909-915 Sunset. LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton Community Development Department Current Planning Division The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not recluired under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). Conditions were imposed as mitigation measures by the Environmental Review Committee under their authority of Section 4-2822(D) Renton Municipal Code (see attached sheet). These conditions are necessary to mitigate environmental impacts identified during the environmental review process. This DNS is issued _under WAC 197-11-340(2). Because. mitigation measures have been • imposed, the lead agency will not act on this proposal for fifteen (15) days from March 5, 1990. Any interested party may submit written comments which must be submitted by 5:00 p.m., March 20, 1990, in order to' be considered. A fourteen (14) day appeal period will commence following the finalization of the DNS. Responsible Official: Environmental Review Committee c/o Don Erickson, Zoning Administrator Current Planning Division • Community Development Department 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA .98055 PUBLICATION DATE: March 5, 1990 DATE OF DECISION: February 28, 1990 SIGNATURES: . enneth . y erg, • Community Development Department Lynn.A.`Guttmann, Director Public Wok ks'-bepartment • • DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED MITIGATION MEASURES PROJECT: SUNSET GARDENS PROPONENT: DENNIS RIEBE ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST: ECF-006-90 APPLICATION NUMBER: SA-006-90 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Applicant seeks site plan approval for 60 unit multi-family residential complex on vacant site zoned for R-3 use. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: The property is located at 909-915 Sunset. • RECOMMENDATIONS: The Environmental Review Committee issued a Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated with the following Conditions: 1. That the applicant site all residential structures a minimum of eighty (80) feet to the east of the Puget Power Lines, in order to protect residents against environmental health impacts from electromagnetic fields. 2. That the applicant: a) provide a fully approved tree preservation/landscaping plan in advance of issuance of site preparation/building permits; b) refrain from tree cutting until preservation and landscaping plans have been approved and a vegetation management permit has been obtained. 3. That the applicant: reconstruct a portion northbound Aberdeen Avenue to widen the roadway so that through traffic is not impeded by vehicles turning left into the project site. All specific improvement and reconstruction plans are subject to approval by the Public Works Department in advance of the issuance of site preparation/building permits. 4. That the applicant provide: a) a storm drainage management system, including (including 25 year/2 day collection/retention basin, biofiltration and oil/water separation); and b) a drainage release (easement) from the downstream property owner or an alternative means of transporting the drainage over the property to the drainage basin. Plans should be subject to approval by the Public Works Department in advance of issuance of site preparation/building permits. 5. That the applicant provide an extraordinary police,services performance bond in the amount of $3,075.00, subject to approval by the City Attorney, in advance of issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy; this bond will be extended for an additional three year period following each Occasion on which money is drawn from the bond. 6. That the proponent provide: a) an erosion control plan; b) a plan for wheel-washing of construction vehicles; c) a plan for periodic watering down of the site; d) a plan for hauling routes and hours 'of operation; e) a plan for right-of-way and cm-site signage to facilitate any . necessary emergency services during construction procedures; and f) .a cash bond for street clean-up in the amount of $2,000.00. These plans, should be approved by the Public Works Department, Fire Prevention 'Bureau, Police Department, Planning Division and Building Division in advance of issuance of site preparation/building permits. In addition staff request: • 1. That the applicant make a voluntary contribution of $9,000.00 ($150 per unit x 60 units) for improvements to area public recreation••facilities. Note #1: At the time of site plan review, in order to achieve compliance with the Site Plan Review Ordinance, some modifications to plans for structural design (residential units, recreation areas, carports) will be recommended -- including but not limited to provision of thematic integrity, selection of wood siding rather than vinyl; the. addition of pedestrian walkways throughout the.site, and to link the site to the Master Trail on the Puget Power right-of-way; relocation of the dumpsters so that they are convenient, but do not disturb view corridors. Revisions will also' be recommended to the landscaping plan (e.g. retention of additional trees at the perimeter of the site, increase in size, number and type of new plantings, contained shrubs at entryway), to the lighting plan (to direct lighting to limit glare to adjacent sites) and for screening at the north, east and south perimeters and at the western boundary of that portion of the site which is to be developed, so that persons do not intrude into the sloped area and either sustain injuries or damage the greenbelt. Other improvements, such as interior insulation and landscaping maintenance bonds will also be required. Board of Public Works authorization will be necessary prior to construction of any roadway at a grade equal to or greater than eight per cent. The proponent will also be encouraged to introduce design.elements on this site which serve to identify Sunset Gardens as a separate and distinct development from nearby Sunset Downs Apartments. Finally, standard on-site and off-site improvements (e.g. hydrants, curbs, sidewalks, gutters) will be required for this complex. Note #2: At the time of site plan approval/issuance of building permits the applicant will need to provide an easement (recorded with King County and filed with the City of Renton) ensuring secondary access to the site for the life of the project via the property (Lot #8) on the southern boundary of Lot #9. The access must be gated and signed so that it is restricted for use as an emergency access. mmdoc • • • • REN'y J :OMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Db�' -diMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF- 006-90 APPLICATION NO (S) . : SA-006-90 • PROPONENT: Riebe & Associates PROJECT TITLE: Sunset Gardens BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval for 60 unit multi-family residential complex on vacant site zoned for R-3 use. • LOCATION: 909-915 Al ,erdeen Avenue N.E . TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG.. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE '.COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P.M. ON FEBRUARY 8, 1990 . REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: , fre- 1(:) ,.Gey ) APPROVED 1/ APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED Any development and/or construction shall comply with current Fire and Building Codes and Ordi- nances. A second means of approved access is required. Fire Dartment access roads/lanes shall be paved minimum width 2,0'; minimum height 13' 6". Yes t- No Preliminary fire flow calculations show a fire flow.of is required. hydrants with a minimum flow of to gpm each is required. Primary hydrant' is required to be within /5-4 feet of the structure. Secondary hydrants are required to be within feet of the structure. An approved-automatic sprinkler system is required to protect the total structure. Yes. "----1;lo _. All fire department access roads are to be paved and installed prior to construction. Yes — All fire hydrants are required to,be installed and 'approved prior to construction. Yes _ _No SIGN TURF OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE • REV. 6/88 3 . Water ° ° ° • _- ° ° 4 . . Plants - ° 0 O ° 0 5 . Animals ° ° ° 6 . Energy & Natural Resources ° 0 7 . Environmental Health ° ° ° o ° O 8 . Land .& Shoreline Use ° 0 ° 9 . . Housing ° 0 0 10 . Aesthetics 0 ° o O ° 11. Light & Glare ° ° 0 o ° ° 12 . Recreation - ° 0 Y 0 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ° ° 14 . Transportation 0 ° 15 . Public Services ° 0 ° • 16 . Utilities 0 ° ° COMMENTS : P ,A '-R .`-/rP��`vim ---C-vny=��7'; Syr- JC/z� , o-�-a !�-, _ /f�- ` ���`, G -, � 27oc�'„'� 1 f4d��e"----"( e--r. - .a�C:e-. -42�d�1.1--44-..G1( 4_-� �" L�'.7.42.r't, �;. ,a��� - __ c--�,cr.-,- -,- e„ -L We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. . - -7,(-ed,-/-7"L.'''. 7a6::,...-7_.1:5"7 e,, ,<.-A—,___, --- .---C '-'' f 70 Signature of Director or Authorized Representative • Date Rev. 6/88 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: L- i , A PROVEDnommow APPROVED WITH 'CONDITIONS ' NOT APPROVED 'Lest6,A4 m-F-11,tci• 'BLOC'S. • i s ,41:4 a T3 '-.1Alln 'rZe- Fick., s, Ilkevs� cra, l I S n '� t a�.._. -►ate . E,ma vlsL3I-e kD�/3c�,T' (ter,1p �2 alem.tno0.. E"^ t'`s,"'c.r1 ec�sS is 't p , Q �' ma's a� U� ,ez-1 ? 5 tit, -Ft.„,.( -�ke.K.s v!.i(FrltncC, 6;14-.1V D S cowl►.J Ly S v W az.,,,„ L�At,µ `M Pe- p� TLr-y TFt i.l,ft.t.$.e.2. op Pam... I T- s eia,..s U A-)Reca i tis1 c__ ixt�----* DATE / Z 7 q c SIGNATURE OF DIRE TOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 6/88 COMMUNITY DEVELOPM','7 DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION • SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY ' DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P.M. ON FEBRUARY 8 , 1990 . .REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED • v • gL • DATE ram, SIGNATURE 0/1511,2ECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE / REV. 6/88 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: //%i/5'7Po�7 j.'-rvlY 5- APPROVED APPROVED, WITH CONDITIONS. . • /<-.- NOT APPROVED Off-site improvement plans required for street improvements * Curb, gutters •and sidewalk • * Street Lighting to City standards • '* Widening, of Northbound' lane on. Aberdeen to allow thru Nor•thb:ound passage • around left turning vehicles to driveway. • j•7 DATE � 7 ,v SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR THORIZED REPRESENTATIVE . REV., 6/88 COMMUNITY DEVELOP] T DEPARTMENT • BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION • SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION .DEPARTMENT • OTHERS : • COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P.M. ON FEBRUARY 8 , 1990 . REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: f5ta.I'1n Larje,r APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS X NOT APPROVED L O t 4! 7 turn Pli Pvw{.Y', /,tr• — - i ci�-ti►n ar r.�-Peas-4 will ruI. to b � e r der -{-o d i re-c/- s)-orrn F'vn of a.r-r ass eri fdrPer , -11 6 a Fle_I 0 i/wA-1-4,-- S 21,144-or J"11A1( be fns4-aI« ( °-( Cc1-yd 'v�� io✓' pf�Sr k dl3-azar ��,�n S' +� dA(k s p r ` 2 e n d es7,gK T e RQ fiol-e-h-11""' p vrr�- S {llb6- - a� Thy ���`°�' �°(�►n-� s� rrb-�$ r�a€I _2 y d e a 1711 r ,s�e f �'� -f�c S�,s d k-oriel a r a s1 1 I1r� rierrivtd i r �r o�Lo th h , 6trl or,b � Erb.scoc Ced itwer"-17°4 % wwvL% � � P • • C/ / / -41 .4/-`�C . P. DATE ..2I 5190 . • � SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE . . • REV. 6/88 • REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: ( j Lull cA APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS L— 1 T APPROVED / 4(r6- e-'2 /1--ca/44"1— ;,--04-7/ ,11,,a, ::_a77 ' 'A-, - --Li'' - /'''' / /, 4 -LP-a-z,o_ Aie-e-k7Licri: cd24--6,-,4-,4,.._jr.4„...-)0/14,-(-,- Al...4_, PlikarLi,i.c....44,116: c.weiZ a-c- ZZ X3 ,__,9- 11 .,,,6,,,, ,,,,,,6„,(2,z___,LL.,e_pt,,,, ,,_ Cam• DATE P�SIGH TURE OF DIRECTO OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE ' REV. 6/88 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT" BUILDING DIVISI)Iv . PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE • LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS THEAPPLICATION DIVISIONBOFPTHEIDOMMUNITY ED IN WRITING_ PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P.M. ON FEBRUARY 8 , 1990 - REVIEWI NG DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: Wert.-e( L.Titi '�� APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED uiit6 56f A`Ce 100-6RHk1N iMPRbgrief45 VLAr+S ?En CM 5TAfiv Aft DS R '9 Nam'ries 6)CiEMSiQN 0>; G1►`fS UTrtUTiEs - . pReU1-104P Y U1iUT,K GOM?OS'ITC 1)(411•I 15 )aT Af 120U60 AS SutirVITrED - Comon) o ?iK& wows . VAiVc$ • E Q120-s-eft-sa. j�� OF �yrp��12NA1?� . 'C $6R�I�3 F,(C: MUST B6 S1tOW N, / 5�{2i�1L tk�1. V IauLTS .� USA a 6,6 fr> Nev 960EuO?M T S>- - C kv / . 6Kolov. l '/DATE. FM. 2-) I i`0 I m P SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 6/88 c'Ar / 2 9-10 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: PLAtN.WINC,/ OI01 51O • APPROVED - APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED 1 P.Roo i 0 t. i qA3 1s 1 vo �lZ.olr! o 15i0Ca . v, t , t;11 ®J 1E.. • N.ru� SIIVt re:: _- A�..IrE �u 1T N 1.�� rt�S T�� . � t"wLf , 6.) te., cb-ro Amco et. LUG 'liouA.0r) i't.• V*rtAV10 gt,C$ ¶' 114, FONX7141VQ1 4 In1 E.U..1+U (.to}Tt4 A"pa S mfi E .. gp I°I C E ) v \itiv.)1b comaso e.J, PrM. 1t. .C,sSTroirtz 10%, ptRAibsIo0 5 R.cwt T iib pJd NKr) 9t.gbLI G W cYN k5 1 S UI RSt10 Tt? VAsseto p,,) o%p SIAp *, Rtco'"'mewb. woota S10110 ttWr1 1k. rl kl ‘.)tN` L. t‘o►hOU t)' pRO E0. 4 0'I1 kit.) toN Lc�r rose ACpt 'To .w .$10. . Nolo erem' l, 11\,i>r `1 C/N -PO IT'S — ,Ch11`leCt iati 'S\AQ0(. '� �b� )NTtRA b �1' 1-04 SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR- OR AUTHORIZED RE1PRESENTATIVE - , ' REV. 6/88 ------ . ` .AAIo . :Z- I q • 9 f j • . .. • • . . • • . • • • . . • ; • . . . Wel s h ink ton i .-1 .11M4 . j,k1S0107-'' ;. •v 1 • . _. ,, AG ..71-. _,...>Len,"ro rat.-”I.A.c..ro I. ,,' ,..... Is .i INN.10,• ...,, ...,,,..4.34.I..._ . . f 1 • • ...d......,....LOTS. rf-4",!:21.:17t7:. 5. , 44kV. 1,1 .=.. cnrigedaVkApik,„ ." -1111107:1Fr?;.:':i=•:.; , •At„.. • , ci,.......,27,.6..-. • C.,,...••4/ • .1 ' i44Iiiii654 ° -7. - 1 ‘:I 4411:ligIlliii4:: 117:111 I ...., ..A•co.te.....,..., ! \ .,m....... , ._ • '792 V•VG.91,..... . -.#,V, .4 (.. •...7.%01,,,:z.,,,,,,,IR )K., .k1:546. , - 1, . ''s,'.'1'.titt,••• • \\L- .--,- 11-1,1' Ili -firldt i . _ • 9•-•..,41 -.9 - i 7.7.1 *- . ••• 1.., ,/i. ''''4 11 .1 . I . . . . , . ...C.P..Te.06.z.i.147.4...1...1 •-.. '.• •'.- rt 1p .f.'...J1 .' '4,- Elledir --,.--..-- . - ',5f ,arro pwr..., • - I I 'rt.- ' ,h;. -'., it'IP f•- IVA --, . . . -.7 - • •4•• ' ' . • • .) .,...,. ..., .,....4, 4 I . k \\4.0.-1-mai< r 1:,, 1..,..,v, IG'NJ- rcurrr-e-rrKY tr-,1415 0-0 ,irKeor Ueol-tr'S .ve.IHrry rit..r= ........... r , 4.3,,,i , • . • • .0 2 z°• •ii. , • • '..•1? g . . . • L9 4" „p ...4, - i . . r -'-'-I _.,/\ ' • i . , • , ) . . __ :,?.‘t • ,-,co..",cd'se'I, , . .- ...,_____. , ..S j . ____.... -__ 7911 I - . - _ •. z.11 <Oz. . E" ------..--";._---1<----.1 i I )• ,,(, I r4C1)2 11166 --. Wig M -../ •AI.t3 .---,.-- to ci Ili 0 \-- ..110 .. re • • •,i 1--,‹ .4 11-1 2/A w 2,3/2 • • TY,31RETS 1....1a.11 1 . 0 CL I...,...r./.... C/3• 0 - • \ Eli . 2/2 •.• c cic cic cic c c LI \........----7-- \ • 1 II' ' 1 I S z'7 L - ------- \ . \ \ . 1. _. ]•_,1 --i'• /1 I I 1 As.1111011.111.111111111111116 '''3 IL3 q i' 0 • \A------- ;! _----- - \ t 4_1..,---„s. 7-C-71 i , ,. . „--- e..fc.i.Fic.Fiqc • , .„ i _, , . 1 , NI' ,•!-.; -14, .. .•! T , . . ,_ _ , i r, \/. ,--, , vi ---!--7c,--- -,;------ 2/2 • i 1-/\<-I i 1 . E. • ' a ,.) \ • ....,______ • i . 0 : . • s..-„,,,,,,r . I . •cm. r. . . . . 7Z \-----Z.----"'"---- tt . 2,.4..! V 1 . 1 ..,.i, ' 11111111 1 • 2/1 .\--------- • . • \ : i . ' Tf. : __i• I__m_ . . • • .,....,, ® • .1 . .. ., . .. • • .. ...,..„..,..,. . .1111‘11111111111" 3/2 •"1 . • 11 • >1 7... j1. ...;\ 11' \\ 3. 1111 11rV \--- \--"\-1323_'' ./ . it 22 . =•. • 1111 , . - 2/ \- \ • 4 3/2 -, • WHII "•••,,, • I° : .\------ r r , Tor ...or • 111111 i 2. ! 1 . . i . kr 6.R.MCD-C9. ' ...--... .." L.....„........-"--....•-•••-- 2-T../ i 09/ ri :A . 1 t, ±......--. . ... __________.___________ ' 1 . f • \,,,,, •!-----------..- . • . 2/2 1 . I" . -1. . \ .. - • - I • • ) - I • 'f.5 -\ I • N WI.00'6.e.'w .5 .2t.... . - . ..__ __L__________ _____ ..---• 1 - . FIFE.trr.crar,....c.c.c.ctour. . r...-1E3 A.S9HP-,1.-1- PA.V.1--le. • , , PROJECT STATISTICS s . fn . • • • . 212.AMA: 2.c Amiss f113,226 2.Y.) . /k . • I I • • 9 •-•4 2 DUAL BA. 14 2.211.9.2 BA. 1 S.F.24 TOUTS 19 •TOTAL 60.12.1 r • 2.011.14.9.2 DA. • • . 2019M.\2 SA. . • I _,ligh, . BUILDING 2 CIRO.FLOOR AREA:10,407 ST 20216.\1 BA. BDAM.\1 BA. • .,. `• . PROJECT TEAM II m. nom-LL a. ' DOI.IG C °O ;o • Ai ORO.YLOOR AREA:11.426. AORM.\2 BA. 20901.\2 Ok. 011.2/APPLICAWT4 ...UA.211 LIMITED BUT.2110.19 .231....2 BA. 4 VARTNE HHHHH G..TWOS ASSAI 12,5.Br IsIMAI A. N..= .2.42.•TIVEST MIMING 2 1= R1...:l'.21d I.AQUAR,WASSINGTON OROS.7100X AA.,11,130 OF 2.34.\2 BA. . 1204)643-4662 HUILDI.Y SDR14.\1 BA. • GROOS FLOOR 2.11.1 2,62 al 2ORM.\1 BA. AR.IT2CT: RIESS 4 AMSOCIATAS . 3022 112TH Arewoz M.I. .11.21.1 R2Q012.1 90 RESIDENT TAL 8 • ADITE 100 _1.,GUM AMA. BELLEVUE,...INGTON 105 TOTAL 2.LS . ITS..2-2633 PROVID2D1 113...DA. LL!'OREN) • 12...DASD TALLA ICOVER2D) 1ANDSCAPE ARCHITECT% DISION 3.LIMITED 23 COMPACT 2 ALLS 10222) LEGAL DESCRIPTION TA .320 112TH RRRRRR S.W.. --I Nucor., TALLS Eli 2VERETT,WASHINGTON 102 TOTAL ISTA TB "206)742-4252 , .. . • IMPERVIOUS AREA) BUILDINGS: CIVIL ENOINEER: DODOS ENGINEMS,12.. PARSING.DR.., 34,120 V. . LOTS 2 AND 10.MARRIES GARDEN HOME TRACTS. I. 4203 14.21 AVENUE N.M. 21D2WALK11 . • AS RECORDED IN VOLUME 34 or SLATS,PA.34, .122 200 TOTAL 23,11.4.. . 14.) i BLILEY.,WASHINGTON RECORDS or XING COM},WASHINGTON. • 1106).3,74/7 OPEN SPACE/UNDEICA. 27,220 B. . CS1,1 ..I 1 ` '1 daOd O ` " IA • ,,,,dM Jo 1FIbly NOISSI�S I .•\ / \ . 0 - a ), . 1 . -' k) i F� `!` maT ` 1 i/ tt '; • gOblik,, . ri � ,,, I "4' itii;l'itt 4 \� A y.: ir Sl �. 0. " s __ pP " II . ctj- 010111)4 41101111— _ Or, : ran: : .....i:"-' trt.4 g _ .„., , ..... 1 . , i . . .=0.72a IN? . ..: , , r �'• �/ Y•1 IIIIIII, °al--0 l• WIPP' • OB` 1111. bill A g '' L m ,,- 1► S A � -1:..i'lltit .' -- : J . I ' %'4 m • T '. m ' 1�*r '� N 1mi1i��� I so 1iiir ' . rAm 1 k f.s• \ ' ,..,r a I— ir 0, :• T ,1011111JJ jr• .1 1 il"g1 . • y , .� IF • ... ... ,, .., 01111- I ` ; _. -- II III o -..�� 3. -"_. -n IIIII!i I- T _ V6 ,,, , , : , , • ,, ‘,,,„ , m R tisi 0. L__111 '1 . 5 i. ;.1.411 . ,9,,' I * • ---„. ,_0,_ „, !41f _TmoI2 :f.� • ;^ _tip, --aai • .., H✓u :.t"!' `i� *- tea. -,//,-,,_,, • I • _,-_. .. ,A ERDEEN AVE. „ S9 GAT 11.16.09 SUNSET CAREEN LTD. PARTNERSHIP DODDS ENGINEERS, I N C. -: ,-✓: NG 0 �l m cEscr.EO J/M A OLSEN MBB6B SE.42N0 STREET CIVIL ENGINEERING SURVEYING PLANNING 2 0 n .) '6CRAWN 0.VAUGHN /BSAOUAN, WA 08027 ' :TA.' 42G5-14ETy AVE.N E-SUT=EW O APPPOVEP BRUCE✓00000 60 UNIT APARTMENT PROPOSAL _ _EELCEVLS.WA.-WA0rVN 96GG� � _ .�. J/ BRUG ✓.00�005.qE- Inlc+i EBS�E»W 4s431a3 i i.�1 PRELIM/NARY GRADING @ UTILITY PLAN • • • • • ,1_,A14'(NG- ^h-IEI 0 . M an YX/tAOI AL GENERAL. NOTES `LAtAW9.�C.EFIFOLIA/LGNrAI PLA':=V.L... p}P IIP„m'^"m�4 . '�P'�Hln �Wa,Iuw% zcA,.. a h •-rl�E 4 PAvl:.p suaFrcFr_ •i FaN �a..lx5• 101,41U''011 i Fr�iorrA { •I C.Ora1 e-IS TO PFaelos (�.:1\YI • ."rifiula PL6LI:YIGNTCAlerII I%iu.. ti{n vzw..�nowt •T•zrnr- cr y�.wir /�,L r"P-ADIALL 6 �'TLiPFf 77,.E Gwvr•HN�1 A �IIIII 411110111101111 1. :1 r-ALAYAI•I - �r71Pn'Lu,YI E / Cf.a. 6jb ww.•'+.V.c.�nr.. w.,r w�ml-Type..,�•I �� ..e„ �( I14I A:t2;•t T N27Fh11 /d�r c'ems. - -F Ip log c' �% A7 or- , / �O Fi+n Alf crew ti—t aFcAIL 6FW11 III A I Ilnll fUr GePRj of 4° III �ummun (�r�� �U7 h71G-¢A/Lµ1 }lf 'i-. . Lem. LA,N_Ally_ -•,..D WAS.P.gGFK.Tr-fi,,s llh 3-WAY 151111011111 5111 0 = UCUIIIA-1.1 flNE �G• P{b • �� z•'�1"^ '7 1. X) �R�n7 C ,. :;;; r11K w• '��II IIIIIII IIi /\'t4E t'lopLG b:d ts{b �! z'h •y,56', !>,-..,mq) ---.- -----7 `- ---- • •AU- Bey APEAS(r jPUB E GPcuHcYoVER\)�to REGENE I�I:II l� '. rr.•••c-,/W�1 ""+"""'�n4 re A 2."ceVn{ aF EAP-r-MUCH. FIrIE [,�Pcur-ID FlR OP- 0�'d.7�♦dl(ll:,1. :'�'AII;'l LI.hITAHlC11/'.!iLlIX)AL LIWLCL 'YEA" C.C./IN DILP..6C0 1/ MASS PlANT1,J0 OF SHRUBS OR OROUNIOCOVFJ IG>;IL 61PIL CrIL Pdl•J-co,�.TTTtttEP--CP OP- >'I • (J 'i-i OENfY41 hFp }ti WN •� 1 'rr..o.+r.r.w<.TME4Yr eR(-r=x�l ,Lit S ARE L:'II Imuteur,��rin'-&-torowh'/ :�r ja . . i �i U{`� y� pccevtn��. �II;:IX��®rlff�..11 F{j �_G*t7Hlh ALAYIn`(pnPPL-fA' y�,A^ .• .. 1 I ...q....e,�.'xp. .,cr w...m N•se.ry 4W4r •A 4'Woe FlNe wit-,newlri(a 6TWG L�CUR W EPC �II�!•YA 116ni':lil n e '�irla-IIA A�Pa.IVn/ it/L,- .. L. �l,,.�w.s y��� N -!J`+ .! FOMIGq ,� .. _ M •� .Rl-- �y >.c.,=,i,,q,�e�, A( ,PD:xEP•Y,cR 2ulL011lyGj A6-ihT up To LgLREAS- ,J Ii 320.1121h SW I:`�0HA�1UL1A/PHEL[ti al" Q., Everett,WA. nh.Iwaua�/FCG¢ecx i %<aG"'4 °''"�L ••rPePs I �SPz THIS 5 I E.ru ca;-v, .�w. I.••IIIw,• l�I.I li•I'I tl I cro= r.EYAILs yIPU PPE TO eG Pal, R•AI'rrlNG 347-2954 1v.£A qry HE.ea•ce 4♦.••'' _ ). 745-8255 e.A --,,%ryE Th IbAL. " .. •• _'MO,.1, �u's,..na.•Yc roreb IbnL lb" O.G, ilk i�l�II��7 "`-'••."•""" •.��i siTA 0En or p.ttrds i eiPAsryISA/F-P-S PRe TO 3E I f C- '•' w`n.�.�:,E�1- b rI PEF.SI,RU9'R.AhTryy -coma-FaPt-u IIIIIIII III IIIIIIIIIIIIII :Icf wuo�uvnWht FHaNb nco7 II c .,. „ _.� ,r.'•cwy • EOUI rN cl CVVE-1 ay� uvx-roru,laarc�. •1•axs Ti U x�`eaHr, � AT ri L9,AtA.n 3L"O.L. (u e:aj e"a max•cam r-ern `euti a v..+�".' ry I1G¢T:{L+nt FYUNL pa?, ` PPOPosep R.Arits ALL[OrIFoPn To Ertl inun ._ •"\A NR-C.tL -SE LILA.Sll(�jq 4. , `O•L. °Tree Staking Detail °Shrub Planting rhiu►°f1P�eRYr,Enrn�LlsHro eYAneau.�H AssxlAnoly c>: W z r 9 Detail �-w,m..o-,•yr. o.�.r. .er •THE LAIH�D�`a'Fl1.PE I _.4tIER(OESIEIIi JaD L7b1 r{N..L BE H011{F�"TM OR F.pPPOJAL RECIAPDIHG S: G11MI({ES, rw'Ii SJoEe1tJPcC ,GR AL7ERHAC1VrJ T rTIFh6 GR•v,J:ry[jS-- • LAI{D1AFP. it 2'%I14HTNH ma Dc1JWL` e nunlGrF1'a .APVForgl.B`(OW11ER `/pp.(fiti•IIIy[) R W H I O • L O -AFe•C lil'X.Tbe- '+{v.L-1.-PCPRAtjrf — I'AlPP AL FOR A'PEAIco oF.ai5 YAP-F3FaLi or A .cpr rice., a••rnC r1c,T uPtH:eek cu,seo BY S UTIUS4K-U.II-IATIL rOHD:TIONIZ,AHD A FFOPP4 1'1,UrrrAille,I,5 PPc4PAn,It-E-LUPlY(j 1.....weP,1-.4. LAI-Vd..'PE a c.w�Is B�'vNLL HcT iDwsn�op. Tr roR-w-,argEs . ePTQ/Tihir a pOTOt�IC O r ♦ _ 9*kc i .I 0 0 0 0 f:.0ii0 9 w 'rC1PP 7�i....a;...ar. o i�- _ f° •:.►�� r f1 O� AO�• ♦C.'60'�'.i3�IT9 ♦q.' b V e O \ . .... �'Io ° ;2.r 00 .��:• 0 00 fi ��il�oT OI,W1 . .tb 2�tp• a rsilt eWkingie�olojo[on ° r • ID , * i, \ __ 4-ivi,/, qUj4411, �! , ���.:..,eT:ve+' ,►oat. Flbr_ •40... ..•fi . 4. . r: V \ill i/101tll+0)�_.r-=��!a��Alri♦ •,...o cii'•, • � 0 QP9 6•,a.. to • Cli, . \ . C/ y• .. 0 (( P • ' %tl. 4•VO 'f; ,R OlS'•►rr O C )7 •�+ �j. •t 3 �p0,^� I{.� q..v _r,- ti V v O' O e'c,U�] o -'44 s dl'� ,• ��. ��' o.410A jOtCl..� epO° '•t'=1��1 040090 .0�,`.` �� � �I J i��. �► :' tee. fie'•): :off' t% ,°^'� 2 i v4Ir � ��0_0Po . ei 9 . . rr` , u j I v �7 f Gn01 IIO . .•I. :: v Av., .' ,,, fees •0. r'.'... li�j►� a �r�tf s_jo.°� _ _ �•e�:4.e o G n O ��f °� °°° 1 • . : •T^Co �dtg:•' n �t ® to \ . 100 �►i p; Vita: ,�.. �i� i ki'� 1.41 r' a' At) tlt .I1 /. • • ►, ' (fie:744e `C/ �,;1.cpl�. 'le �.,� IIII r. ' I E� ,n4v0 ° 1/r awl....:���, wil _ a1 /`'e00' .,O\ Off' ,rG� 1�.�.! Y(i.:-:1• !1!*a•O •,: VI' ,_boo,°� as�♦ $7� 'fe0 .. �.: �ih • . oa. ��tr - op f� Tor Lo-r .., b•'�®• . (i1,i ,♦C `' Cn;Y, 1j1 •'9 • ' �Ii; IIII ��r,$ O: \ ea4e r� r .. or rr. • IPd qo �OC��I' e e°'�°1j11� a►'e• A.o� _ _ ma o. . �O�e� n1�1 ►�.v�::., :_ ,,,, yr �1"4"t, • • .0 �' Le''0 Oi I C.. - ' o__Dl ei o ka v,;1" I: • --- ---- -----=®�li��� ► ► d,�6.t) -� ��I wr.� •-0 JEN.�t,1lr 10 000000 if v ' '��e� I e� Z 00�►IA QO �IQII 11 •" ♦ .1r �p� 4�1 Y��:ie� e�: mo: /:.'oof �L.�e000000e. %1°��h►''�r400000��r�n_ � o�frr►,IeO ♦r e �s /{�, tom . e'e o . 11 ` NOP'rw . 1 IIIIIII pm u:vnuu�p,glll • • I 3 I SHEET ho • till W I Oil • ,,� � h•1 - 11 1 , ;IIIIIIIWW / ' 011 1ia1- lIIIIIIIIIII RIIr. Inim NMI simin 1,ail I iiiiiI -C� ► \ . 1a ■■ 1 • ,� . � '�ul_ lf � ► ll_I1uuuuu:-_ � i-IIIIIi_ _ � a 11 IIiIliIiIiHiiI � i� I I=IIIIIII - r •jin IHI Minn I--:.1111 =_ _Fr"! _' • I I i\( .I II�1 IItII1tMII__ _ - _ '" ..—. ..... -_ I 1 ��:: I �!- — . F.'' 1__1 1.I WV';'%q'' . A'`: mi .:--• — . I 111 MA rl _ . 110 i�I,c. 10,..' , FelA �rilr�Illl __ _ 'IIMO • = _—if ■■..la • II II!IIIIIIIIII II I II II II/—'I I ` r�--:- I -L. _ �— °i I I I I I I'H I I I 1111 - - 111111- 1— I u 1= . ,_ II III -I = { I 1 i 1( I _ IllIt CI_ - ■■■e■ Ey �— s.IIIII M1 ■..■■ F- • ..... �...III 1 I I I i I I . .._. a.■.■_J 1 . A 7?ao i::::PIM E 1 .ems. MEM d1- . _ - C I� -- < ,,rn - � II. IIIIIII IIIIIIIr, - .- r" 6 I .!; ' , ; _= = { D : 111 ens rill P.: I D I / I�I i~ •t` I 1=I�iii Ili::::II : I _ ;I '_O I1 ® Ili '� I 1 m11:11:;(`� �.3� I z I i f I III IL� � i _ /_ , n • . In __ . - __ II _� _,1 *MB!! I �/- F_ • , ,�: Ems`• : a I I ram:,- I Ili: _ �• 1.0 -_ -� , c GGiii 9 `-l�ul�llllllumulplomilis;iPil I •• cc• .r o• t o Iz D6 ���Yo■ r nu■ ...n 11111I%III. .:1 s Il :: I I�u I IIIII :::: I �I . • _. 111111ll _I_ IIIMIN. 1111Illlllulll j� - -��IA-hl9ll.l l wilmtlllla a 4 - �I Nlz ` 460,_ rl A° �i IMIN IIIIM ■■e■." F I.a.. a■■.=:, • I ICI I-1' -_ . • -�-" �IiIIII IN -1 II c Z I I 1.- Attlii • i ISSUED • _-) I I/29/89 PRELIMINARY 60 UNIT APTS RIEBE & ASSOCIATES �I'I`'� G-,C,R IJ D E BUILDING PROPOSED FOR ARCHITECTURE • PLANN I NC LIHf 7 erNR,A+P • Iseea sE Er NO STREET -Y-. ELEVATIONS RENTON,WA • 3ozs 112TN AVENUE N.E. - ISSI.ODAN•WASHINGTON 900T1 BELLEVUE. WASHINGTON 98004 (206) 889-9653 (206) 624-1557 ARCHITECT E.DHI ECi C. 0 • \''.1...qb 'L► \, 'I ' r . 1111IIn1lmmlu11.I • 4 '' 11 11 n� I IIIIIIE ' a Idr rya ■ ■4 [IERI..e_ p r 11.1A� ■■ ■■■ IIIill yIr■■■ ■ L!E■ ■. E Imo_4llhiiLIIIIIIPD. I I 1 Atti it let I g I 1 -. Løt Iro° �� r � -I •1 4=_1 ' Qot 1 I Ii :_ _ =11111111i 1�1 °R 0° 111011 MP- F oe = II u _1 :=4 .n �_iiii; . ...m. ii ! �l 1 NE i E 1 t I --. .... 1 {y t IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII III __ _ `- r _ ' + IIIIII - -- --_== `� /IIIIIIQI�I rr �;..yr _ = f' ' � •pE6- —_ 1 I j#0 IIIIII ■-. _ � 11i�i _ _ J 1 ■ n 71 c 11 iiii0Liil!!! --....-:Lsr-- -1 m mg um:1 I• 1 . " 1 I I ii,A, ‘,V, ' . ,i- • rn :_:; yam. != i. Ji rn I t�_I I�1\ _ '�i. d . 1 n1111u0111111.§�� �• 111.41111 I i;II f 1!ill I I IIIIL..�I�II i�_if '? 1 _ gym_I,liu. � - I' i4 I I till -') k`-:1�›<-- r .� ti IIIIIIII, a1 a 1 ,, 1 Syr. _ - . , �1 ,I,� �iulll 1. Iirl ni,:7.0i 1 .12_,.. : 111, . ICI � L Fis. _ I1 „II 414.1! .__Iit.:}1>e. '. ' 1 /II \\T: 1 ' li .. I .7 .: ri I1 ;;1 liii gibi 71 iP1 . IAA = is p�Jir�r 11 1 IIllIllih11I • — I • _ ��� . rd IIlIII,ll• rmn? 1 - 3....� (fEt:.* •�' im mu .1 11 I liselsrp . ialniFAIII • o �� 1.111 e F'I`IEi �,�_ !ujI'I - lw�;■II�IIIIII �j,',r,.�.'��ii ' LCC■C=11 ILI , " 1;11 Sul I' I--:: -�.n.•:€ riii r , �i► e • g c. EIRIIIIIIIIIIIIr�'�•, __ o I 11 ilIDIv ' ii- �1 °° _hill II I i ' ` � I r• "NI — __..Jam_Allilk'` _ _ '�' i ��!.*-' 1 Illilllllllllllllli ' -IIIIF__=lk* —11111t 1 r iS - - th!II!' -Imi. _� 11 _ $T, _ — _ _dam_: `I • 1 I'u■■■IIill 1:=:E �IIIIII ■om ■■ g_ LJI" J' • � s III ■' . y; n i Ey z{IT= • ° I!J' /8y 'PRELIMINARY 60 UNIT APTS. .'(iN 1 GAIN RIEBE & ASSOCIATES WI-1Mo RF}P ,b ''' "'' BUILDING PROPOSED FOR . ARCHITECTURE • PLANN I NC levee SE. 41,10 STREET (�l ELEVATIONS RENTON,WA 3025 112TIT AVENUE N.E. ElELLEVUE. W656I NCTON 98006• E0.°rd.NA. (206) 689-9653 (206) 626-1557 '�CHITKT Cr• • .A N\ N + 71 • t �J • • • DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED MITIGATION MEASURES • • • PROJECT: Lowe Rezone • • ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST: ECF-1.04-88 • APPLICATION NUMBER: R-104-88. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Applicant seeks reconsideration of a non-project rezone of 2 . 5 acres of property from R-1 Residential Single-Family to R-3 Residential Multiple-Family. This is a non- project action. The submitted site plan is for illustration only. . • LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: • 909/951 Aberdeen Avenue NE RECOMMENDATIONS : It is recommended that a • Determination of Non-Significance- Mitigated be issued with the following conditions: 1. That, in conjunction with the proposed rezone action, the applicant be required to provide sufficient bonding -to replace any trees removed from the subject property by any person for reasons other than public health, safety and welfare, in advance of the development of a tree plan, subject to approval by the City's landscape planner. 2 . That, in conjunction with the proposed rezone .action, the applicant be required to provide covenants requiring traffic analysis and mitigation as. a part of any future .development proposal. [ a. That, in conjunction with the proposed rezone action, the • applicant provide restrictive covenants to run with the land, which establish setbacks of development from the power lines (to the west of the. property) to a point on the- property sufficiently away from those .lines to protect- public health and safety; that. location is to be determined by the U. S . Department of Energy. • 4 . That, in conjunction with the proposed rezone action, the . applicant. be required to provide an agreement for an easement from owners of property to the north of the site for connection to sanitary .sewer service 'lines. Such easement `shall. be filed with King County and placed in City of Renton records . NOTE: Section 4-745 of the Zoning Ordinance ' restrictslevels of development on Greenbelt areas which are at a slope equal to/or greater than 25% . Because such slopes exist on the northwest portion of the site, development .of the site may be limited to a density of less than the maximum 25 unitsper acre allowable under Section . 4-709A (R-3) of the Zoning Ordinance. ' ' Determination of permitted number of units will be ' made at the time of site plan review based upon this consideration together with other environmental, and land use impacts identified in conjunction with that review. • :::>:< ::::<:::::>:::::�:�>:za:.«<:::>:::�::::;::::;::::::<.::.»;:;:�:::•:;:•;:>:.::..........::..:::O�':::RENT.CyN:::::::.:::•::::•:<.;:•::::•;:.;:: •.�::•:::::::::::::::.�::::::::.::.•:::: CURRENT P >:::::;:>::::;:;::>:;:>:::::>::::>:«:::»:;:;: :::..:.::FIDAVI'I':•;;qF:.:52VC�.::<BY:.::,I �.L�NG;:.:;:.;:.:.: ::; :.:::::::: .::.;:•:>;:.;:.::.;;:.:;:. • • On the I- day of . ' l- , 19 90 , I deposited in the mails of tie Un 'ted States a sealed envelope containing t4.E. "R arc!• documents. This information was sent to: Name Representing �e-Y1v- R ek - SI t Y1S�" l P , in • • (Signature of Sender) V. . �q�� Subscribed and sworn to me this I day of (X1 19g0 . Notar Public in and f r the Stat f Washington residing at kJVl Ugh ; • therein. 1. . .::...:ro�.:e ct.;::Numb:er.,::::::....::::-n::: �v::.^::.;:.:.::::.�:::::._::::::.;;;:.;:.;:»:<.;;:;.::.::.>:>:.;:•;;:.;:.;;:<�>:;««;.:::::;:.�::::::.:::.:. • CITY OF RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor Planning Division April 26, 1990 ,Dennis Riebe 3025 - 112th Ave NE, #100 Bellevue, WA 98004 RE: Sunset Gardens, 909/951 Aberdeen Avenue N.E. ECF;SA-006-90 Dear Mr. Riebe: This letter is to inform you that the appeal period has ended for the Determination.of Non- Significance-Mitigated for the above-referenced project. No appeals were filed. Public Hearing for site plan approval is scheduled for May 8, 1990 at 9:00 a.m. in the Council Chambers, Second Floor, Renton Municipal Building, 200 Mill Avenue South. If you have questions or desire clarification of the above, please call Lenora Blauman of the Current Planning Division, Community'Development Department, at 235-2550. For the Environmental Review Committee, ntif) Donald K. Erickson, AICP Chief, Current Planning DKE:kac cc: • Sunset Garden Ltd. Partnership 18868 SE 42nd St Issaquah, WA 98027 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2550 CITY ~fF RENTON Community Development Department Earl Clymer, Mayor Kenneth E.Nyberg,Director April 23, 1990 E. Dennis Riebe Riebe & Associates 11808 Northrup Way, Suite W-360 Bellevue, WA 98005 Dear Mr. Riebe: RE: Sunset Gardens, 909-951 Aberdeen Avenue File ECF;SA-006-90 The date of Tuesday, May 8, 1990 at 9:00 a.m. has been set for public hearing for site plan approval on the above matter. The hearing will be held in the Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall, Renton, Washington. The applicant or representative(s) of the applicant is required to be present at the public hearing. A copy of the staff report will be mailed to you seven days before the hearing. If you have any questions, please call 235-2550. Sincerely, r, Donald K. Erickson, AICP Chief, Current Planning DKE:kac cc: Sunset Garden Ltd. Partnership 18868 SE 42nd St Issaquah, WA 98027 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 • NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON HEARING EXAMINER RENTON, WASHINGTON A Public Hearing will be held by the Renton Hearing Examiner at his regular meeting in the Countil Chambers on the Second Floor of City Hall, Renton, Washington, on May 8, 1990 at 9:00 a.m. to consider the following petitions: SUNSET GARDENS ECF;SA-006-90 Applicant seeks site plan approval for 60 unit multi-family residential complex on vacant site zoned for R-3 use. The property is located at 909-951 Aberdeen Avenue. Legal descriptions of the files noted above are on file in the Renton Community Development Department. All interested persons to said petitions are invited to be present at the Public Hearing on May 8, 1990 at 9:00 a.m. to express their opinions. Published: April 27, 1990 Account No. 51067 OF Re% ai NOTICE 094'e°sEptE P City of' Renton Land Use Hearing Examiner • • . will hold a P..1,11BLIC ..-..!.- ...:;. 11EARIING . .. . •• . .., NEARING y . , , CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL MAY 8, 1990 • 9:00 • ON 'BEGINNING AT A.M. P.M. • CONCERNING: • SUNSET GARDENS REFERENCE NO. ECF;SA-006-90 Applicant seeks site plan approval for 60 unit multi-family residential complex on vacant site zoned for R-3 use.. �,� M •14 • , 1 $.•[]6 u I I r..lda no aJ.-r.,J r. •C] , I I ?CIA,. I- • v.o.nc Ind • _ v.o. I.nd - / r,! Js, �r1t � r•s.47� 1'• 13 I _� .so 0.35 nc -S• t44 dJ r eo / _ y6-iUl o Lib g / . • 1 __ r..Id.no. 12 "'LUy % ',:..t:Rrrc.4 !!r`-,� ..c7A,. • 2. r .Id_no. • ,,'. ti)per �C/I�•I'pi 9�� 5 ' - tJl t i .p•rcm.nc r= I.nd vwowne I.nd r 3 _- ,2,• 58 6 1 7' o Z.,/* G/ Atii 6 o2i '"1;7rrdn3. 6 ...:V:: 'rrn S ilL'c- ' //.// V 9 •,/,2 I . 91 nol,.,n.l p �° 7J to .p.rt m.nc. __ :it __ / '_• .Id_no. t s„��, ao � 3 8 ss ZIr' z o sp ac. LL z 4nc IJ ••� i r..id.nh P . m • .ne land' , •/ \ _ _r'.-id.n o:;/ \ LJu Igkgd wt� . rz • n z O o.ne 1. .,Jc.cP /l.r .. 9T,S, r'�,+ . rn no D - m� 31,1 Der / �• 1 Br, • 1. lam; 46 :1: A-6 vane I_nd �� 4 ,n'i•.. eJ! �'e•r4=1.7, ✓\' t n Ili I. rr Z r Jdo.J9 '.!!Dn „ to'�, > i�i•J lol-`t�``•�: y_ aLndu( R, d :9 - tr. J Z • GENERAL LOCATION AND/OR ADDRESS: Property located at 909-951 Aberdeen Avenue. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CALL tHE~"CITY ';OF''RENTON PLANNING DIVISION'.''•,. 235-2550 THIS NOTICE .NOT TO BE. RE,MOVED'.WITHOUT PROPER `AUTHORIZATION CERTIFICATION I , I'1ir . S ui, fca-. ,- HEREBY CERTIFY THAT 3 COPIES OF • THE ABOVE DOCUMENT WERE POSTED BY ME IN 3 CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON OR NEARBY THE DESCRIBED PROPERTY ON lk—.27 —a6 • ATTEST;: zl;Jbscribed and sworn to before me, a • Nota v Public, in and for the State of Washington . esid.in in � ��ok a , on the j l SIGNED : L 4( , oy of: -tri 1 q 0 • OF R4,� • O AMMO 2 1` O94 P6 94TFD SEPI " City of Renton Land Use Hearing Examiner will hold a • . • 1 CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS , CITY HALL MAY 8, 1990' ' •9:00, ON •BEGINNING AT A.M.• P.M. • .CONCERNING: • SUNSET.GARDENS REFERENCE NO. ECF;SA-006-90 Applicant seeks site plan approval for 60 unit multi-family residential complex on vacant site zoned for R-3 use. . •- 14 r I r..1drnco _ . $ ' I Cb v J r.t.97 v.o.nt land : - . v.o.nt lrnd 67/.17' I ns Isr -1 , 17o , [ ! '1.7.7n 1oI Q1�( / 0.33 AC.& l j•, 13. 11 ti �. i t °� Lnd' M.35AC.. 644 67 - T t.ILO . � 1 >.• •• f 96 Q!3 0 )W[ij` 9 1 - r •-'---��'------ •- I� t / ,ap.rtm.ntagi '': n- h 6 I ` J • 6 I` 7 [ v.o.nt Irnd vwornt I.nd �/ ..... 0• •. :•. _ to, 4 / , ��I,�.'r :6nt6 •' 61.1a -• ns 'irra',, V ,, t• i6.°kl I .,,g;',,.. „.. ) 6 r 11� ....L3i•:: c'• %tre...C. •'// / voi,w.. „AD' ///tme..4, 4 /si,', , ... / ?6 r yr r.r t)�I �p e gn to rpwrtm■nt. r-_ t/S __- • CO. `r...id.na. L7' 6 � o � 3 8 of 55 M • W`� C 0.9nn AC. .. Z 405 t2 t<..Id.n-' • I r..Id.no,tt • � �'' 1 _ 9 iz Dr,2 rprrtm.n -t I _`f r - c et IPI • . v.o.nt I.nd'. .r h-..Id.no■r/ ht dI pp gm rn r r:C.C.f r .tco" ,2+r '9.•F� rl J�/-\" .:Ii7�2 S Z b •rJG.cf 6 9T d' a rt.' vrornt Irn 6 2 t \ y s e' m• " � I no T .r�1 , 37,y :,:I �,r r, ,� r ._{ r.rldrno. t "mot:�.1. (V .' r..,(�11':� 1/9 (815) 'COV :.>1.•'r+ 7. 12 , Q`b6 fdr' r.7r Z r- T 260.7r •1:.70 'lo. L 10 L .a{i•3 lot-': �8'B /� x •-- 3- l rJ�1 9 u w �?i}�y, ��9TiW/ --1 •r•r•Id,.no. 11 r.rld..no wk_, y::,! {{I i -_ vwo.nt I.nd ` I )te� •7 I n _ }u t ^ 2 • 1 IS Z c, AID :. sc GENERAL LOCATION AND/OR ADDRESS! Property located at 909-951 Aberdeen Avenue. • •FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CALL tHE `:CITY '',:OF•• RENTON' - PLANNING DIVISION :, 235-2550 THIS NOTICE NOT TO. 'BE '"REMOVED WITHOUT PROPER .AUTHORIZATION - . 4'. Is CITY �F RENTON Community Development Department Earl Clymer, Mayor Kenneth E.Nyberg,Director April 5, 1990 E. Dennis Riebe Riebe and Associates 11808 Northup Way Bellevue, Washington 98005 RE: Sunset Gardens, 901-951 Aberdeen Avenue N.E. (SA 006-90) Dear Mr. Riebe: This letter is to inform you that the comment period has ended for the Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated for the above-referenced project. During that comment period,you requested reconsideration by the Environmental Review Committee of Condition #4, with respect to requirements for biofiltration and storm water collection/released. These issues were considered by the Environmental Review Committee on April 4, 1990; the Committee unanimously agreed that: 1) The biofiltration requirement should be retained, however, under the language of this condition, the Public Works Department may determine that existing native vegetation and new landscaping are sufficient to achieve the desired filtration. 2) The currently required 25 year collection/2 year release system for storm water management should be retained, as permitted under the City of Renton Storm Drainage Ordinance (4-22) and King County standards. This requirement is established as valid, based upon site characteristics and the effects upon vicinity property from recent rain storm activity. The Committee's determination is final. It may be appealed to the City's Hearing Examiner no later than 5:00 p.m. on April 23, 1990. Any appeal must state clearly why the determination should be revised and must be accompanied by anon-refundable $75.00 filing fee. 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 If you have questions or desire clarification of the above, please call Lenora Blauman of the Current Planning Division, Community Development Department, at 235-2550. For the Environmental eview Committee, ix/a") Donald K. Erickson, AICP Secretary DKE:amd cc: Sunset Garden Limited Partnership 18868 S.E. 42nd Street Issaquah, WA 98027 ( NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION Environmental Review Committee Renton, Washington The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a Determination of Non- Significance-Mitigated for the following project(s) under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code. The following Applicant(s) have completed a mitigation process: SUNSET GARDENS ECF;SA-006-90 Applicant seeks site plan approval for 60 unit multi-family residential complex on vacant site zoned for R-3 use. The property is located at 909-915 Sunset. Further information regarding this action is available in the Community Development Department, Current Planning Division, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington, 235- 2550. This. Determination is FINAL. There is a 14 day appeal period which will end at 5:00 PM on April 24, 1990. Any appeal of this decision may be made to the City's Hearing Examiner, Municipal Building, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, Washington. An appeal must state clearly, in writing, why the Determination should be revised and must be accompanied by a non-refundable $75.00 filing fee. Published: April 9, 1990 Account #51067 OT ICe ENVIRONMENTAL DECLARATION ECF;SA-006-90 APPLICATION NO. PROPOSED ACTION SUNSET GARDENS DENNIS REIBE Applicant seeks site plan approval for 60 unit multi-family residential complex on vacant site zoned for R-3 use. GENERAL LOCATION AND OR ADDRESS Property located at 909-915 Sunset POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE ( E.R.C.I HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION f-]DOES CSPOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT 1-1WILL WILL NOT BE REQUIRED. THE CITY OF RENTON WILL NOT ACT ON THIS PROPOSAL FOR 15 DAYS FROM THE DATE BELOW. COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY AN APPEAL OF THE ABOVE DETERMINATION MAY BE FILED WITH THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER BY 5:00 P.M., April 24, 1990 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON PLANNING DIVISION AT 235-2550. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION CERTIFICATION I , Mcx So.velcL , HEREBY CERTIFY THAT 3 COPIES OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENT WERE POSTED BY ME IN 3 CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON OR NEARBY THE DESCRIBED PROPERTY ON 4- /A - qp ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a Notary Public, in and for the State of Washington residing in 0 , on the /7a ,SIGNED : `y77 XuAddu day of Q_I (..,) I q.0 NOTICE ENviRoNmENTAL DECLARATIoN ECF;SA-006-90 APPLICATION NO. PROPOSED ACTION SUNSET GARDENS DENNIS REIBE Applicant seeks site plan approval for 60 unit multi-family residential complex on vacant site zoned for R-3 use.. GENERAL LOCATION AND. OR ADDRESS • Property located at 909-915 Sunset POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE [ E.R.C. 3 HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION CIDOES NIPOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT [WILL >WILL NOT BE REQUIRED. THE CITY OF RENTON WILL NOT ACT ON THIS PROPOSAL FOR 15 DAYS FROM THE DATE BELOW. COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY • AN APPEAL OF THE ABOVE DETERMINATION MAY BE FILED WITH THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER BY 5:00 P.M., April 24 , 1.990 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON PLANNING DIVISION AT 2 3 5-2 5 5.0. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION 51067 Lynn Rainey ,being first duly sworn on oath states that he/she is the Chief Clerk of the VALLEY DAILY NEWS • Kent Edition • Renton Edition • Auburn Edition Daily newspapers published six (6) times a week. That said newspapers Public Notice are legal newspapers and are now and have been for more than six monthsprior to the date ofpublication referred to, printed and published NOTICED T ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION in the English language continually as daily newspapers in Kent, King ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE County, Washington. The Valley Daily News has been approved as a legal RENTON, WASHINGTON newspaper byorder of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for Thehas Environmentalsseda ReviewminCommittee Pe � (ERC) issued Determination of Non- King County. Significance-Mitigated for the following pro- ject(s) under the authority of the Renton The notice in the exact form attached, was published in the Kent Edition iSEal Code. SUNSET GARDENS SUNDENS , Renton Edition x X , Auburn Edition , (and not in ECF;SA-006-90 supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers Applicant seeks site plan approval for 60 Pub 1 i c Notice unit multi-family residential complex on during the below stated period. The annexed notice a vacant site zoned for R-3 use.The property is located at 909-915 Sunset. (Review Committee) R4022 This decision will be finalized in 15 days. Written comments received after 5:00 p.m., March 20, 1990 will not be considered. A was published on March 5 , 1990 fourteen (14) day appeal period will com- mence following the finalization of DNS-M. The mitigation measures imposed by the City of Renton's Environmental Review The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the Committee are available at the Current sum of$ 23 .28 Planning Division of the Community Devel- opment Department, Municipal Building, Renton, WA 98055, Phone: 235-2550. Published in the Valley Daily News an March 5, 1990. R4022. Acct. #51067 1,. (ti\ 4114 . Subscribed and sworn before me this c t b day of March 19 9 0 No Public for the State of Washington residing at Auburn, King County, Washington VDN 087 Revised 4/89 City of Renton Community Development Department Planning Division Memorandum Date: April 4, 1990 To: Environmental Review Committee From: Donald K. Erickson, Secretary Contact: Lenora Blauman, Project Manager Subject: Sunset Garden (SA 006-90� R BACKGROUND On March 5, 1990 the ERC issued a DNS- Mitigated, for Sunset Gardens, a proposed 60 unit apartment complex. The applicant has requested that the ERC reconsider Condition #4 which requires " . . .a) a storm drainage management system, including 25 year collection/2 year retention basin, biofiltration and oil/water separation; and b) a drainage release (easement) from the downstream property owner or an alternative means of transporting the drainage over the property to the drainage basin. . .subject to approval by the Public Works Department in advance of the issuance of building permits. " Specific applicant concerns relate to the requirement for biofiltration and to the requirement for a 25 year/2 year collection/retention system. The applicant bases his requests upon his belief that at the time of application (12/89) a "10/10 y/w" system served as the "design basis" and that his "project. should be reviewed under the requirements and ordinance that are in effect at the time of submittal. " FINDINGS/RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff finds/recommends the following: Collection/Detention: Staff believe that Mr. Riebe's "understanding" that 10 year storage/release standard served as the "design basis" at the time of submittal of his application is not a correct understanding. The Storm Drainage Ordinance (4- 22) , which was in effect at the time of application and is in effect now, allows for both 10 year storm frequency and 25 year storm frequency design criteria for drainage plans, with the particular system for any site to be required based upon site characteristics. Staff note that when the subject project was initially reviewed, it was considered for 10 year detention/release rates. However, subsequent review, prior to the TAC review and prior to the issuance of the ERC determination indicated that the 25 year/2 year system was preferred, based upon soil terrain/slope on this site, together with drainage basin characteristics, in order to protect the site itself. and neighboring properties. This preference is further supported by flooding which occurred in the area following the "100 year storm" of January, 1990. Finally, note is made of the fact that similar management systems have been required for Renton Ridge, Phase II, north of the site, and that a 25 year/2 year system is planned to be required for Sunset Downs, a 60 unit apartment complex immediately south of this site. Comments from Public Works Department staff indicate that a small number of properties in the vicinity have been approved for 10 year detention/release -- these decisions were made upon site characteristics and/or technical information available at the time of project review. Thus, while storm systems are not consistent in type along the entire corridor, each storm system is consistent with site characteristics, and with local regulations; despite, the dissimilarity of the plans on some sites, the individual systems are generally compatible. Staff recommends that the requirement for 25 year storage /2 year release rate currently required be retained. Biofiltration: Staff finds that natural filtration can adequately be achieved for this development by the sizeable amount of native vegetation that is slated to be retained on this site, and with new landscaping to be provided for the development. Staff recommends that the requirement for biofiltration be retained, but that a note be added to indicate that ERC is amenable to the use of retained/planned vegetation to achieve desired biofiltration, subject to approval by the Public Works Department. Thank you. CITY OF RENTON MEMORANDUM DATE: April 3, 1990 TO: Lenora Blauman, Senior Planner FROM: Kim Scattarella, Stormwater Engineering Specialistt - SUBJECT: SUNSET GARDENS DETENTION REQUIREMENTS The detention requirements for Sunset Gardens from Stormwater Utility shall be a 25 year/ 24 hour design storage with a 2 year/24 hour design predeveloped allowable release rate. The method for computation shall be the SCS Hydrograph method, as documented in the 1990 King County Surface Water Design Manual. Three other developments: Renton Ridge (Phase II), Sunset Downs, and Kalasountas Office Building have had site plan approval by Stormwater Utility prior to July 1989. At that time, the detention requirements were a 10 year/24 hour design storage with a 10 year/24 hour design release. Since then, new information from preliminary basin studies, and from recent flooding have shown that the requirements for this area need to be upgraded to a 25 year design storage with a 2 year design release rate. CITY OF RENTON MEMORANDUM DATE: March 21, 1990 TO: Lenora Blauman, Senior Planner FROM: Kim Scattarella, Stormwater Engineering SpecialistKel' SUBJECT: COMMENTS ON SUNSET GARDENS D° G 'yd The following comments are in response to the letter written by Mr. Riebe, regarding the conditions for site plan approval: 1) The detention requirements shall be computed by the SCS Hydrograph method. The following conditions must be met for detention storage (in accordance with the approved King County Surface Water Design Manual). a) The post developed peak flow may not exceed the predeveloped peak flow for a two year design storm. b) The 2 and the 10 year design storm for post developed must be routed through the detention system, with the peak flows not exceeding the pre developed peak flow for a two year design storm. 2) Previous comments made by Garth Cray about detention requirements cannot apply here, since the site plan was not approved at the time. 3) These requirements are similar to those that have been established for Renton Ridge, Phase II, in close proximity to Sunset Gardens. cc: Dick Anderson • _N -TRO CONTRACTS R-O-I41 TO: CITY OF RENTON MAR 20, 1990 4:42PM #276 P.01 _ eTRO ,'imicipaltty of Metropolitan Seattle Exchange Building • 821 Second Ave. • Seattle, WA 98104-1598 PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF RENTON FACSIMILE TRANSMISSION COVER SHEET MAR 2 1 1990 RECEIVED crEl. SENT: r E.) /9'd r�5; MITTIFD TO: Ll' 4- Jt ,ISM1 dEIS FROM: e _,C s / / C.) me) "' mall stop) Telephone No,: /�5 NUMBER FOR CONTRACTS&RIGHT-OF.WAY: (208)684.1480 OF PAGES TRANSMITTED: • ding cover sheet) MENTS: .x • ,:OM:METRO CONTRACTS R-O-'' TO: CITY OF RENTON --R 20. 1990 4:43PM #276 P.02 1" - _. PD Munk*. .A 1Vktropolitan Seattle Exchange buildirg • 821 S. - id P ve • Seattle,WA 98104-1598 March 20, 1990 Environmental Review Committee o/o D"n Erickson, Zoning Administrator City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 Determination of Nonsignificance File No. : ECF-006-90 Dennis Riebe Dear Environmental Review Committee: [Metro staff has reviewed this proposal and anticipates no significant impacts to water quality or to Metro 's wastewater facilities or public transportation services. thank you for the opportunity to review and comment. Sincerely, 0,4 a/4:::4___ aregory M. Bush, Manager !nvironmental Planning Division ;MB:p1g3553 f�. _z METRO��.__ L Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle Exchange Building • 821 Second Ave. • Seattle,WA 98104-1598 L NMING DIVISION C!TY OF RENTON MAR 2 2 1990 March 20, 1990 FCIV ® Environmental Review Committee c/o Don Erickson, Zoning Administrator City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 • Determination of Nonsignificance File No. : ECF-006-90 Dennis Riebe Dear Environmental Review Committee: Metro staff has reviewed this proposal and anticipates no significant impacts to water quality or to Metro' s wastewater facilities or public transportation services. Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment. Sincerely, C17/1 Gregory M. Bush, Manager Environmental Planning Division GMB:p1g3553 March 20, 1990 City of Renton i;` , i17ifLN Environmental Review Committee , 200 Mill Avenue V MAR 2 0 .1990 Renton, Washington 98055 E C �1(� re : Sunset Gardens 1J 909-95.1 Aberdeen. Ave . N. E. File #ECF; SA-006-90 Gentlemen, We would like to take the opportunity to comment on the con- ditions . associated with the committee ' s Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated for the above referenced project . We have reviewed the conditions and concur with conditions 1 , 2 , 3 ,5 , 6 . We request reconsideration and reevaluation of condition #4 . Item #4 references that a storm drainage management system be provided . which includes biofiltration. On ,March 9 , 1990 our engineer talked with Mr. Kim Scattarella:• Mr. Scattarella said that biofiltration was not necessary on this. site. We request that the biofiltration requirement be removed . Item #4 references that the storm drainage management system include a collection/retention basin sized to a 25 year/2 . year release based on the SCS method. The applicant 's engineer ' confered with Mr. Garth Cray of _ the City of Renton Storm Drainage Department during the preparation of the design for the storm .system in November 1989 . Mr. Cray told our engineer that the city requires the system to be designed on a 10/10 , y/w basis . This is the design criteria that was • used in our proposal . The, application for site plan approval was submitted to the city on December 7 , 1989 . We understand that the 10/10 ,y/w basis was - the design basis at that time . We' feel that our project should be reviewed under the requirements and .ordinances that are in effect at the time of application submittal . We therefore respectfully request reconsideration of the design criteria to .be used for the storm collection/retention basin. Thank you for your attention to these matters . • Should you have any questions of us or should you need any further information please do not hesitate to contact us . incer , ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING `'� ' - 08 NORTHUP WAY, SUITE W-360, BELLEVUE, WASHINGTON 98005 E. Dennis R i e b e PHONE: (206) 889-9653 FAX: (206) 827-4696 707 Washington State Duane Berentson Department of Transportation Secretary of Transportation District 1 15325 S.E.30th Place • Bellevue,Washington 98007 March 20, 1990 Don Erickson {.C,;-• r M T�,.:.,,;_.. ON 'N Zoning Administrator : ' Planning Division FT,• , Community Development Department ;l MAR 2 0 1990 200 Mill Avenue South . E' >` i� ' Renton, WA 98055 E C L�; � \J k SR 900 MP 12 .50 CS 1713 Mitigated Determination of Non-Significance Sunset Gardens File No. ECF; SA-006-90 Dear Mr. Erickson: This letter is in response to the above MDNS. The proposed project involves construction of a 60 unit multi-family residential complex. The proposal is located at 909-915 Sunset Blvd. WSDOT concurs with the DNS as mitigated. Should you have any questions and/or concerns, please feel free to call Donald Hurter (562-4274) or Dick Aust (562- 4274) of my Developer section. Sincerely, 3egeAgW lio'ede4PgPt JAMES L. LUTZ P.E. Utilities/Developer5y Services Engineer DA:da cc: State Aid WSDOT MS 121 • i \> t� DERUS p44,, ,� DEVELOPMENT COMPANY v`,5�0�4-P u:��, /0/ ite March 14, 1990 Mr. E. Dennis Riebe, A.I.A. President Riebe & Associates 11808 Northup Way, Suite 360 Bellevue, WA. 98005 RE: SUNSET GARDEN APARTMENTS Clarification of Building Addresses — Dear Dennis, At your request, I have reviewed all information concerning the street addresses of the two par- cels which comprise the Sunset Garden property. To confirm, the addresses are as follows; Parcel 9 909 Aberdeen Ave. N.E. Parcel 10 951 Aberdeen Ave. N.E. Should you have further questions regarding this topic, feel free to call. Otherwise I will assume that this meets your needs. Very Truly Yours, Ste ien J erus President 18868 S.E.42nd Street Issaquah,Washington 98023 (206)643-4669 Oar --1 d c% CIT`_ OF RENTON 001 Public Works Department Earl Clymer, Mayor Lynn Guttmann,Director P ANNING DIVISION CITY OF RENTON MAR 121990 PIECE1VED March 9, 1990 Mr. Jim Olsen Dodds Engineers 4205 148th Av. NE Bellevue, WA 98007 Dear Mr. Olsen; I would like to respond to your questions regarding Site Plan Approval from the Storm Water Utility Division for Sunset Gardens. The detention requirements as outlined in the Environmental review are for 25 year design storage and a two (2) year design release, as calculated by using the SCS Hydrograph method. An accompanying condition is that the developed peak flow cannot exceed the predeveloped flow for the two year design storm. For more information on this, please consult Sections 3.3-3.5 and 4.4 of the new King County Surface Water Design Manual. You also asked about biofiltration on your site. This is not a specific requirement for Sunset Gardens. The biofiltration requirements that are in effect here are addressed in Section 4.6.3 of the new King County Surface Water Design Manual. A baffled Oil/Water Separator is required in the City whenever a new development has storm runoff draining through a significant impervious area or parking lot, before the drainage goes into a biofiltration swale, or just before drainage leaves the site. The baffled Oil/Water separator must meet the criteria of velocity of less than or equal to 1.5 ft/sec. for the specific design storm. Detail of an approved Baffled Oil/Water Separator is attached. If you have any more questions, please don't hesitate to call me at 235-2631. Very Truly Yours, YA/1;1 09. .,4ca.217fa/Ltilik/ Kim D. Scattarella Senior Engineering Specialist SUNSET/KDS Attachment cc: Lenora Blauman, Senior Planner 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2631 • �L•pC ..;5.,n.r.:Y'.yl,: •,�'+'4';?^• �r: : ;i2'+sar:• > 'i. ¢. µ'.•i:,lran::, x :7. .�'•' . 3 t t' �` "'r 5!•. r.,.` I1.. .tom f..• .:......, 5—...........a.......�S.;vli•::w.w /1$Yd�IriJ38SCt."l.�`9Sa'r.:,,. 23,e`.' a;:.it'_ism'J'rct�s `G:'?e"r.•�� .�iiil9i�:il,eAiYrr::l�..�.V:�reWd��� C��::..::m:e:.:�'::.:::.. »�.:t.N..L::':�..•.v-..\1.n.4';:..�.,:......._. • i.. 660-SA- i 1. \ I w3 •'f • • E • b - 1012-P Diamond Plate Inspection Covers :t 660-ST Top 1,350 lbs '' } i 222-P Diamond Plate Cover • y —I i~ • j ,: I_I IT!- _I_I Flow Diffuser LI , ' Baffle I f _III O e� ati• I —' ,• Inspection&Sampling p , :'i!•Iysie'.l1- \ ' Fi' • — Tee(by others) •;r:.,..:..• : �;a:.;;;^-' I_ . 2 •,Puri•'` ke., (/�i �, y� .I Oil Retainer Baffle _• x k ; D. 0 1 Y• 6'-0" •7.1 4:,`•:.. ; *00.„...0„,441 : . - I:, r Vault No.660-SB . ir _y ;(? ,• 8"d hole each end 5,750 Ibs. . ;, 7' for inlet&outlet • •a E 4'•0" Grit/Sludge i Retainer Weir 1 I. l .. I • Max.capacity 450 gal. • Flow'at 15 min.'retention:30 g.p.m. For details see reverse side. UTILITY VAULT CO. Copyright 1976 119 ISSUE February.1985 • : .I ,:::' p.x.p.E > �is>:»3 >> > ; ; <• : >`` CU:;RE. T...P .•:••:.:•::::••:•:•• ::•: »:: ••••• :••••:: .LANN::.;:::G:;::::::,:.:::<::; :;::�• ::`.::` `><� ' ss �� .<>'�? .>;`�'��� .��� °�.>< . ............ FIDA:V.. .....b.'...SE12V ....... ... - On the 1t day of VM , 19 90 , I deposited in the mails of the United States a sealed envelope containing G1nec(.\\•5- 'a --N c V\v v-c-6161, documents . This information was .sent to: Name Representing (.a vsA-vim- K , \--- Ir 'N-in -- , t . 4' La\cl'ucL . \.D€L., -Rcl-e__.\7,, 1 a f-1 S\/L-P x t1 C c ^nos. Az: t . o- l tL a A(G-1 `� 1l 1'I� 1 _ r\dinLo,„ COWrvo.'0 • (Signature of Sender) �ak,., _. , _oR� Subscribed and sworn to me this 7 TN day of Upik,CH , 19 ct0 . 4_o -Q- (? -k. Nry 'Public in and for the State of Washington residing at e 107-0 dJ , therein. r. .. .ec t I :::P.r..o:::e ct Numb e r:: : i N. 14 0 ( ->:::::: : ::1. t '7'...:wiln g egg'''!'ni 1 1 dj '.'., � tr CITY OF RENTON "u. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT o. 34-, Earl Clymer, Mayor Planning Division March 5, 1990 Dennis Riebe 3025 112th Ave., N.E., #100 Bellevue, WA 98004 Re: Sunset Gardens • 909-915 Aberdeen Avenue N.E. File #ECF;SA-006-90 Dear Mr. Riebe: This letter is written on behalf of the Environmental Review Committee and is to inform you that they have completed their review of the environmental impacts of the above referenced project. The Committee on February 28, 1990 decided that your project may be issued a Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated with the following conditions: 1. That the applicant site all residential structures a minimum of eighty (80) feet to the east of the Puget Power Lines, in order to protect residents against environmental health impacts from electromagnetic fields. 2. That the applicant: a) provide a fully approved tree preservation/landscaping plan in advance of issuance of site preparation/building permits; b) refrain from tree cutting until preservation and landscaping plans have been approved and a vegetation management permit has been obtained. 3. That the applicant: reconstruct a portion northbound Aberdeen Avenue to widen the roadway so that through traffic is not impeded by vehicles turning left into the project site. All specific improvement and reconstruction plans are subject to approval by the Public Works Department in advance of the issuance of site preparation/building permits. 4. That the applicant provide: a) a storm drainage management system, including (including 25 year/2 day collection/retention basin, biofiltration and oil/water separation); and b) a drainage release (easement) from the downstream property owner or an alternative means of transporting the drainage over the property to the drainage basin. Plans should be subject to approval by the Public. Works Department in advance of issuance of site preparation/building permits. 5. That the applicant provide an extraordinary police services performance bond in the amount of $3,075.00, subject to approval by the City Attorney, in advance of issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy; this bond will be extended for an additional three year period following each occasion ow-whie-h money is drawn from the bond. - 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2550 t 6. That the proponent provide: a) an erosion control plan; b) a plan for wheel- washing of construction vehicles; c) a plan for periodic watering down of the site; d) a plan for hauling routes and hours of operation; e) a plan for right-of- way and on-site signage to facilitate any necessary emergency services during construction procedures; and f) a cash bond for street clean-up in the amount of $2,000.00. These plans should be approved by the Public Works Department, Fire Prevention Bureau, Police Department, Planning Division and Building Division in advance of issuance of site preparation/building permits. In addition staff request: 1. That the applicant make a voluntary contribution of $9,000.00 ($150 per unit x 60 units) for improvements to area public recreation facilities. Note #1: At the time of site plan review, in order to achieve compliance with the Site Plan Review Ordinance, some modifications to plans for structural design (residential units, recreation areas, carports) will be recommended -- including but not limited to provision of thematic integrity, selection of wood siding rather than vinyl; the addition of pedestrian walkways throughout the site, and to link the site to the Master Trail on the Puget Power right-of-way; relocation of the dumpsters so that they are convenient, but do not disturb view corridors. Revisions will also be recommended to the landscaping plan (e.g. retention of additional trees at the perimeter of the site, increase in size, number and type of new plantings, contained shrubs at entryway), to the lighting plan (to direct lighting to limit glare to adjacent sites) and for screening at the north, east and south perimeters and at the western boundary of that portion of the site which is to be developed, so that persons do not intrude into the sloped area and either sustain injuries or damage the greenbelt. Other improvements; such as interior insulation and landscaping " maintenance bonds will also. be required. Board of Public Works authorization will be necessary prior to construction of any roadway at a grade equal to or greater than eight per cent. The proponent will also be encouraged to introduce design elements on this site which serve to identify Sunset Gardens as a separate and distinct development from nearby Sunset Downs Apartments. Finally, standard on-site and off-site improvements (e.g. hydrants, curbs, gutters, sidewalks) will be required for this development. Note #2: At the time of site plan approval/issuance of building permits the applicant will need to provide an easement (recorded with King County and filed with the City of Renton) ensuring secondary access to the site for the life of the project via the property (Lot #8) on the southern boundary of Lot #9. The access must be gated and signed so that it is restricted for use as an emergency access. Because the Environmental Review Committee imposed specific mitigation measures rather than issue a Determination of Significance, there is a required fifteen (15) day comment period during which comments are solicited from various agencies, jurisdictions or individuals (including the applicant) who may have an interest in the Committee's decision. The comment period will end March 20, 1990. Following the end of the comment period, the City will finalize it's Determination unless comments received require a reevaluation. Following the finalization of the Determination, there is a required fourteen (14) day appeal period. Staff urges you to contact the various City representatives, as appropriate, (e.g., the Public Works Department) as_soon as possible, to obtain more information concerning specific mitigation elements recommended for this project, if you have specific questions. This information will assist you in planning for implementation of your project and will enable you to exercise your appeal rights more fully, if you choose to do so. In addition, by the end of the comment period, we should be able to establish a tentative public hearing date before the Hearing Examiner, should a public hearing be necessary. If you have any questions or desire clarification of the above please call Lenora Blauman of our office at 235-2550. For the Environmental Review Committee, r:::21/14 Donald K. Erickson, AICP Chief, Current Planning DKE:mr OF RFC 4 O .46 e DTI LIE 94 094T f0 SEPZ0 E City of Renton Land Use Hearing Examiner will hold a PUBLIC HEARING in CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS , CITY HALL ON MARCH 6, 1990 BEGINNING AT 9:00 A.M. P.M. CONCERNING: VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER PARKING GARAGE PHASE II ECF;CU-006-89 Applicant seeks approval of a conditional use permit for Phase II of the Valley Medical Center Parking Garage. Phase II has 253,445 square feet and will provide an additional 797 parking stalls. The property is located at 400 South 43rd Street,at the northern portion of the Valley Medical Center Campus. ), oz Iy n q.„ a_ in f7.311'it I C > CS D nC °^ as 3, 4 4, iCt ^- a C SOUTH 43R0 STREET • /C GENERAL LOCATI SAND/OR ADDRESS: SOUTHEAST CORNER OF S.W.GRADY WAY AND RAYMOND AVENUE S.W. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CALL THE CITY OF RENTON PLANNING DIVISION 235-2550 THIS NOTICE' NOT TOe BE REMOVED WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION • CERTIFICATION I , b�l- E���� ��.. hD HEREBY CERTIFY THAT rq 15 ) COPIES OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENT WERE POSTED BY ME IN n-ri°a (3 ) CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON OR NEARBY THE DESCRIBED PROPERTY ON � � : d `A tett ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a Notary Public, in and for the State of Washington residing in Krum �l , on theclAd SIGNED : ka. .. - day of - tip CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST NO.: ECF-006-90 APPLICATION NO(S): SA-006-90 PROPONENT: DENNIS RIEBE PROJECT NAME: SUNSET GARDENS DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Applicant seeks site plan approval for 60 unit multi-family residential complex on vacant site zoned for R-3 use. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: The property is located at 909-915 Sunset. LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton Community Development Department Current Planning Division The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). Conditions were imposed as mitigation measures by the Environmental Review Committee under their authority of Section 4-2822(D) Renton Municipal Code (see attached sheet). These conditions are necessary to- mitigate environmental impacts identified during the environmental review process. This DNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340(2). Because mitigation measures have been imposed, the lead agency will not act on this proposal for fifteen (15) days from March 5, 1990. Any interested party may submit written comments which must be submitted by 5:00 p.m., March 20, 1990, in order to be considered. A fourteen (14) day appeal period will commence following the finalization of the DNS. Responsible Official: Environmental Review Committee c/o Don Erickson, Zoning Administrator Current Planning Division Community Development Department 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 PUBLICATION DATE: March 5, 1990 DATE OF DECISION: February 28, 1990 SIGNATURES: enneth . y erg, Community Development Department ( r • Lynn.A.'`Guttmnann, Director Public Works'bepartment DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED MITIGATION MEASURES PROJECT: SUNSET GARDENS PROPONENT: DENNIS RIEBE ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST: ECF-006-90 APPLICATION NUMBER: SA-006-90 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Applicant seeks site plan approval for.60 unit multi-family residential complex on vacant site zoned for R-3 use. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: The property is located at 909-915 Sunset. RECOMMENDATIONS: The Environmental Review Committee issued a Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated with the following Conditions: 1. That the applicant site all residential structures a minimum of eighty (80) feet to the east of*the Puget Power Lines, in order to protect residents against environmental health impacts from electromagnetic fields. 2. That the applicant: a) provide a fully approved tree preservation/landscaping plan in advance of issuance of site preparation/building permits; b) refrain from tree cutting until preservation and landscaping plans have been approved and a vegetation management permit has been obtained. 3. That the applicant: reconstruct a portion northbound Aberdeen Avenue to widen the roadway so that through traffic is not impeded by vehicles turning left into the project site. All specific improvement and reconstruction plans are subject to approval by the Public Works Department in advance of the issuance of site preparation/building permits. 4. That the applicant provide: a) a storm drainage management system, including (including 25 year/2 day collection/retention basin, biofiltration and oil/water separation); and b) a drainage release (easement) from the downstream property owner or an alternative means of transporting the drainage over the property to the drainage basin. Plans should be subject to approval by the Public Works Department in advance of issuance of site preparation/building permits. 5. That the applicant provide an extraordinary police services performance bond in the amount of $3,075.00, subject to approval by the City Attorney, in advance of issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy; this bond will be extended for an additional three year period following each occasion on which money is drawn from the bond. 6. That the proponent provide: a) an erosion control plan; b) a plan for wheel-washing of construction vehicles; c) a plan for periodic watering down of the site; d) a plan for hauling routes and hours of operation; e) a plan for right-of-way and on-site signage to facilitate any necessary emergency services during construction procedures; and f) a cash bond for street clean-up in the amount of $2,000.00. These plans should be approved by the Public Works Department, Fire Prevention Bureau, Police Department, Planning Division and Building Division in advance of issuance of site preparation/building permits. In addition staff request: 1. That the applicant make a voluntary contribution of $9,000.00 ($150 per unit x 60 units) for improvements to area public recreation facilities. Note #1: At the time of site plan review, in order to achieve compliance with the Site Plan Review Ordinance, some modifications to plans for structural design (residential units, recreation areas, carports) will be recommended -- including but not limited to provision of thematic integrity, selection of wood siding rather than vinyl; the addition of pedestrian walkways throughout the site, and to link the site to the Master Trail on the Puget Power right-of-way; relocation of the dumpsters so that they are convenient, but do not disturb view corridors. Revisions will also be recommended to the landscaping plan (e.g. retention of additional trees at the perimeter of the site, increase in size, number and type of new plantings, contained shrubs at entryway), to the lighting plan (to direct lighting to limit glare to adjacent sites) and for screening at the north, east and south perimeters and at the western boundary of that portion of the site which is to be developed, so that 'persons do not intrude into the sloped area and either sustain injuries or damage the greenbelt. Other improvements, such as interior insulation and landscaping maintenance bonds will also be required. Board of Public Works authorization will be necessary prior to construction of any roadway at a grade equal to or greater than eight per cent. The proponent will also be encouraged to introduce design elements on this site which serve to identify Sunset Gardens as a separate and distinct development from nearby Sunset Downs Apartments. Finally, standard on-site and off-site improvements (e.g. hydrants, curbs, sidewalks, gutters) will be required for this complex. Note #2: At the time of site plan approval/issuance of building permits the applicant will need to provide an easement (recorded with King County and filed with the City of Renton) ensuring secondary access to the site for the life of the project via the property (Lot #8) on the southern boundary of Lot #9. The access must be gated and signed so that it is restricted for use as an emergency access. mmdoc • • 40 CITY OF RENTON lea COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor Planning Division March 5, 1990 Washington State Department of Ecology Environmental Review Section Mail Stop PV-11 Olympia, WA 98504 Re: Environmental Determinations Transmitted herewith are copies of Environmental Determinations and Environmental Checklists for those projects reviewed by the Environmental Review Committee on February 28, 1990: DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED UNSET GARDENS ECF;SA-006-90 Applicant seeks site plan approval for 60 unit multi-family residential complex on vacant site zoned for R-3 use. The property is located at 909-915 Sunset BLUME DISTRIBUTION FACILITY ECF;SA-112-89 The applicant seeks to obtain site plan approval for a warehouse/office complex, including two structures, parking and service areas, landscaping and recreational amenities. There is a wetland on the site -- .99 acre portion is proposed to be filled and the remainder will be enhanced with native vegetation. The 16 acre project site is vacant and is zoned for manufacturing park use. The property is located at 601 Monster Road The fifteen (15) day comment period for these projects will end on March 20, 1990. Following the end of the comment period, the City will finalize it's Determination unless comments received require a reevaluation. Following the finalization of the Determination, there is a required 14 day appeal period. If you have questions, please call Lenora Blauman or me at 235-2550. For the Environmental Review Committee, (:: ),44 .r ,. Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator DKE:mr cc: Mr. Craig Larson, King County Planning Division Mr. Gregory M. Bush, Metro Department of Wildlife Mr. Joe Robels, Department of Fisheries Mr. James Lutz; Department of Transportation Ms. Connie Corpuz, City of Seattle Muckleshoot Tribal Council 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2550 /� ' , NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMI'1"1'EE RENTON, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a Determination of Non- Significance-Mitigated for the following project(s) under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code. SUNSET GARDENS ECF;SA-006-90 Applicant seeks site plan approval for 60 unit multi-family residential complex on vacant site zoned for R-3 use. The property is located at 909-915 Sunset This decision will be finalized in 15 days. Written comments received after 5:00 p.m., March 20, 1990 will not be considered. A fourteen (14) day appeal period will commence following the finalization of DNS-M. The mitigation measures imposed by the City of Renton's Environmental Review Committee are available at the Current Planning Division of the Community Development Department, Municipal Building Renton, Washington 98055,. Phone: 235-2550. Published: March 5, 1990 Account #51067 ENVIRONMENTAL DECLARATION APPLICATION NO. ECF;SA-006-90 PROPOSED ACTION SUNSET GARDENS DENNIS REIBE • Applicant seeks site plan .approval for 60 unit multi-family residential complex on vacant site zoned for R-3 use. GENERAL LOCATION AND• OR ADDRESS Property located at 909- 9 I5 Aberdeen Avenue N.E. POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE [E.R.C.] HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION ❑DOES >4POES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE' ENVIRONMENT. AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT DWILL WILL NOT BE REQUIRED. THE CITY OF RENTON WILL NOT ACT ON THIS PROPOSAL FOR 15 DAYS FROM THE DATE BELOW. COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY rrauru -)n qqn AN APPEAL OF THE ABOVE DETERMINATION 'MAY BE FILED WITH THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER BY 5:00 P.m, • FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON PLANNING DIVISION AT 235-2550. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION • CERTIFICATION I , h�i vt ScLve,Iti. , HEREBY CERTIFY THAT 3 COPIES OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENT WERE POSTED BY ME IN • 3 CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON OR NEARBY THE DESCRIBED PROPERTY ON 3 - 9 - 90 . • ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a Notary Public, in and for the State of Washington ' residing in A��JTO/J , on the �t� SIGNED : `�'/'O✓zty ,a/�G day of a _J R 0 1 OL _D 17 . oTi E ENVIRONMENTAL DECLARATION APPLICATION NO. ECF;SA-006-90 • PROPOSED ACTION . SUNSET GARDENS DENNIS REIBE Applicant seeks site plan .approval for 60 unit multi-family , residential complex on vacant site zoned for R-3 use. GENERAL LOCATION AND• OR ADDRESS Property located at 909-915 Sunset • POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE CE.R.C. ) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION ❑DOES >WOES NOT HAVE. A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE • ENVIRONMENT. AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT DWILL Ili:WILL NOT BE REQUIRED. THE CITY OF RENTON WILL NOT ACT ON THIS PROPOSAL. FOR 15 DAYS FROM THE DATE BELOW. COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY MaRC'N 7n i ggn AN APPEAL OF THE ABOVE DETERMINATION MAY • BE FILED WITH THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER BY 5:00 P. M., • FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON PLANNING DIVISION AT 2 3 5-2 5 5 0. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION • i • • • • • .....::..•:..:::::::::::::::,:: :.::?: COMM. ...:.:.::Y: D...VE:.'0.:M.. .. ..:::. ........ . ..... ..... ...................::...::•:.:.:.•.::::..:::.:.:.. ....:•. :TECHNTC AL:<:: DV' SORY IT.TEE:::::<:<:::::::»::::>::: ::::::»>::»:::<:::>::::>::::><:: :>:<»»:> > • ............ ........................... ................................................................................................................................................................................ .... ... ................................................................................................................................................................................................................ ......................................... ............................................................................................................................................................................... ............ ............. ................................ ............................................................................................................................................................ CH••E•• ........... .. .......................................................................................................................................................................................................... ..... ...... ...... . .................................................................................................................................................................................................. .................... ...... ............................................................................................................................................................................................. DES:Cl2I:Pfi:I:ONi:OF PR POSAL.. Pro nent i kin btai ite 1:.:o-:.>: ::;:•:•:::;<•::.:,:•:<•:;.:, t 'f:o:ra <60::'`` :'i.. ..... : i:. ;: ::;;::«:>::::>:;€_;:an a rova 1 un t mult i . .. . . . :::::::::::::::<:::::>;::::::;;::: ?:;>:::: ::»:::::: :::: ;:::: :fi::::'•is2:::>:: ::>::t:;f:a'Tll :1;;>::residential complex .. ........................ ....................... ............ac:re::::: racant:>:s> e:<:>z:oried•:::f.o:r:::me:drum:::<:«:;:.::>:;::<.>::> :. • :>:.LO:CAT:I..QN:::.OF::::PRgP....SAL. ::.....:...•....:.:90.9....915:..Aber.... .. ... .........en.................................:..:.:.:.................. (LAND USE) • 1. 'Whether the proposed development _is compatible with the Comprehensive Plan Map and Plan Goals, Policies andlObjectives for the subject property? The proposed residential complex is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan Map designation of Medium Density Multi-Family Residential Use. Similarly, the complex is generally consistent with Goals, Policies and Objectives for the subject property, such as Residential Uses (e.g. housing densities and types to suit a variety •of age groups, lifestyles. and income levels should be ' encouraged; views should be maintained or enhanced; medium density multi-family dwellings should be a buffer between low density multi-family residential and more intensive uses, multi-family dwellings should be located near arterials, employment and shopping centers) ; Urban Design (e.g. .growth and development' should occur in a timely and logical progression through the urban area, vacant land' surrounded by developed land should be given priority for development, land where adequate public utilities area available should be given priority for development) ; Slopes Objectives; and . Vegetation Objective. • 2 . Whether the proposed development is consistent with the Land Use Map designation? The subject property was reclassified from R-1 to R-3 , Medium Density Multi-Family Residential Use in 1989 . Standards for this zone include maximum density of 25 units per acre. ' Approximately 23 units per acre are proposed for this site, including a density reduction to address the presence of sloped areas and to retain a portion of the existing natural environment (e.g. vegetation) . 3 . Whether the proposed development is consistent with Zoning Ordinance regulations for multi-family residential development? The proposed development is generally consistent (or can be readily o,modified t be consistent) with development standards required for Medium Density Multi-Family Residential Use (4-31-8A) , with the Site Plan Review Ordinance (4-31-33) , the Landscaping Ordinance (4- . 31-34) , the Parking and Loading Ordinance (4-14) . Similarly, the proposed development, is well away from sloped areas. on the site, and, therefore, is consistent with Greenbelt Ordinance (4-31-35) requirements. i Technical Advisory -r''ommittee Staff Report Sunset Garden Page 2 February 23 , 1990 i 4 . Whether the proposed development is compatible with vicinity land uses? The proposed development is bounded on the north and south by multi-family developments, on the east by single-family homes, and on the west by I-405 and the Puget Power utility line corridor. The property is determined to be well-suited for multi-family use, with the proviso that all living units will need to; be sufficiently . distant from the power lines to mitigate environmental health impacts to residents (See Environmental Elements Section "D" below) . (ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS) 1. Whether the proponent has adequately identified land addressed the following anticipated environmental impacts? a. Earth , Impact: The major portion of the subject property ',includes generally flat and gently sloped (maximum 15%) terrain. A portion of the western side of the site is sloped between 15% to 25%; this portion is slated to be retained with existing natilve vegetation, and development density has been adjusted to reflect the presence of the sloped area. Mitigation Measures: None required. Policy Nexus: Not applicable. b. Land Use/Housing. Impact: The property proposed for development appears to be well suited for residential use, as it is an in-fill site essentially surrounded by multi-family and single-family development. It is convenient to arterial roadways, public transportation, schools, employment and shopping areas. Adequate infrastructure and public service resources are available to serve the proposed complex. Both the Comprehensive Plan and recent market analyses indicate that the northeast area of Renton, where this site ;is located, is appropriate and desirable for multi-family development. An existing single-family home will be demolished. Mitigation Measures: None required. Policy Nexus: Not applicable. c. Aesthetics Impact: The proposed development includes a 60 unit apartment complex (estimated to house approximately 108 persons) , carports and open parking, recreation areas for children and adults (including a ,congregate center) , and service areas.' The development, as planned, is generally consistent with Code requirements for R-3, medium density, multi-family !residential development, such as density, setbacks, and building heights. At the time of site plan approval, staff will recommend that thematic integrity be established for all structures (e.g. residential units and carports) , that cedar siding provided rather than vinyl siding to assure that exterior materials on the site are both attractive and durable, that improved pedestrian linkage be provided within the site and to adjacent Aberdeen Avenue (See Section "f" below) , that the exterior lighting plan be revised to provide more complete illumination of the site while reducing glare to nearby site, and that dumpsters be relocated so that they are conveniently sited, but away from view corridors. Revisions will also be recommended to the landscaping plan to retain more j • Technical Advisor---^ommittee Staff Report Sunset Garden Page 3 February 23, 1990 - existing trees on the site, and to increase the number, size and diversity of new plantings. , Staff note that the proposed development is very similar in design and presentation to a neighboring development. While this similarity is acceptable, staff would encourage design improvements on this site which serve to identify Sunset Gardens as a separate and distinct development from Sunset Downs. Mitigation Measures: None required in conjunctioniwith environmental review. Some revisions -- as described above -- will be recommended at the time of site plan review. Policy Nexus: Not applicable. d. Natural Environment Impact: As noted previously in this report, the site is essentially vacant, with a substantial number of significant trees. A tree inventory has been provided which indicates !that a considerable number of trees will be retained on that portion of . the site which. is slated for development; no trees.'are planned to be removed from the sloped portion of the site. On that section of the site which is to be improved, some additional tree retention will be required as well as new landscaping to enhance the natural environment and for aesthetic improvement. The proponent will be required to obtain approval for the landscaping plan at the time of site plan approval. No tree cutting will be permitted on that portion of the site which is sloped at greater than 15%; no tree cutting will be allowed at any location on the site without approval by the Landscape Planner and permits must !be obtained for all tree cutting as required by the Tree Cutting and Land Clearing Ordinance. The steep slope (greenbelt) on the west side of the property poses a potential hazard to children playing in the vicinity. At, the time of site plan review, staff will recommend that wood fencing be installed along the slope boundary to protect against accidents to persons or damage to the sloped area. Mitigation Measures: That the applicant: 1) provide a. fully approved tree preservation/landscaping plan in advance of issuance of site preparation/building permits; 2) refrain from tree cutting until preservation and landscaping plans have been !approved and a- vegetation management permit has been obtained. Policy Nexus: Environmental Review Ordinance; Tree liCuttingand Land Clearing Ordinance. e. Environmental Health Impact: Puget Power Lines exist parallel to and immediately west of the site. Puget Power has indicated possible plans to increase the present 55 kvw lines to 115 kvw and/or 230 kvw within the next five years. Studies by the U.S. Department. of Energy (U.S. DOE) and other organizations indicate potential health problems for persons living or working close to these power lines. At present, the U.S. DOE has recommended that no dwelling units be located closer than forty ('40) feet for these lines and eighty (80) feet if power generation is 230 kvw. The proponent will be required to design the proposed development to comply with that U.S. DOE , recommendation. Mitigation Measures: That all residential structures be sited a minimum of eighty (80) feet to the east of the Puget Power Lines. Policy Nexus,: Environmental Review Ordinance; WAC 197-11-960 (Environmental Health) . f. Traffic Technical Advisor- ^ommittee Staff Report Sunset Garden Page 4 February 23 , 1990 Impact: The proposed development is estimated to generate approximately 365 ADWVTE. Both a traffic study provided by the proponent and an analysis conducted by Traffic Systems Division indicate that anticipated off-site impacts to adjacent rights-of way (from this development and from related cumulative development) can be addressed by standard off-site improvements and additional selected modifications to the roadway to facilitate efficient movement of through traffic. Off-siteimprovements, should also serve to provide safe, efficient pedestrian travel routes. On-site vehicle travel routes are depicted as being, up to ten per cent . (10%) in grade; these roads will need to be approved by the Board of Public Works. On-site pedestrian linkages will also need to be expanded to serve all structures (residences, recreation areas, service and parking ' areas.) , and to link the development with Aberdeen Avenue. Mitigation Measures: That the applicant: 1) provide; standard off- site improvements (e.g. curbs, sidewalks, gutters, street lighting) ; and 2) reconstruct a portion northbound Aberdeen Avenue to widen the roadway so that through traffic is not impeded by vehicles turning left into the project site. All improvement and reconstruction plans are subject to approval by the Public Works Department in advance of the issuance of site preparation/building permits. At the time of site plan review, the applicant will be required to: 1) redesign pedestrian walkways to improve linkage between residences and service/recreation areas on the site, and to provide safer, more efficient access to Aberdeen Avenue; and 2) to obtain Board of Public Works approval for all portions of the on-site roadway which exceed an eight per cent (8%) slope. Policy Nexus: Environmental Review Ordinance; Building Regulations; . WAC 197-11-960 B. 14 . g. Light, Glare and Noise Impacts: The proposed project is anticipated to generate some light, glare and noise as a result of development characteristics, such as exterior lighting and location of travel routes/parking areas, and as a result of ordinary activities by residents -- e.g. use of recreational areas. Design and location of buildings, parking areas and recreation areas on the site are intended, in part; to mitigate light, glare and noise impacts. Landscaping plans and exterior lighting plans similarly, have been designed and/or will be recommended to be designed to mitigate light and glare. Mitigation Measures: None required in conjunction with environmental review; minor modifications to landscaping, lighting and screening plans will be required in conjunction with site plan review. Policy Nexus: Not applicable. h. Public Services/Utilities Impact: Public services (e.g. fire, police, utilities) are generally adequate, or can be readily upgraded with standard improvements (e.g. hydrants, secondary access, utility lines) to serve the proposed development. School facilities are available for the estimated 15 school-aged children. On-site recreation areas may require some minor modifications, at the time of site plan review, to ensure that adequate, safe amenities are available/conveniently located for use by children and adults. Staff will recommend a voluntary contribution to off- 1 • Technical Advisor:- ^ommittee Staff Report ,Sunset Garden Page 5 February 23, 1990 • site public recreational facilities, in conjunction! with environmental review. Storm water management plans will need to be designed to include an • on site collection system which is structured to flow into the North Renton drainage basin. Public Works staff are generally supportive of conceptual plans submitted to date; some modifications to design /systems specifications may; be required. Additionally a plan for transporting drainage over the property (e.g. a drainage release from Puget Power) must be !obtained. • Mitigation Measures: 1) That the applicant make a voluntary contribution of $9, 000. 00 ($150 per unit x 60 units) for improvements to area public recreation facilities. ;2) That the • applicant provide a storm drainage management system, including (including 25/2 year collection/retention basin, biofiltration and oil/water separation) and a drainage release (easement) from the downstream property owner or an alternative means ,of transporting the drainage over the property to the drainage basin, subject to approval by the Public Works Department. Policy Nexus: Environmental Review Ordinance, Comprehensive Parks Plan, Building Regulations, Comprehensive Utilitiee Plans. i. Construction • Impact: Standard construction impacts (e.g.. erosion, noise, dust end debris, traffic) are anticipated in conjunction with the development of the proposed residential complex. These impacts can be mitigated ,by the customary measures, as listed below. .Mitigation Measures: Staff• recommend that the proponent be required to provide: 1) an erosion control plan; 2) a plan for wheel-washing of ,construction vehicles; 3). a plan for periodic watering down of the site; 4), a plan for hauling routes and hours of, operation; 5) a, plan for right-of-way and on-site signage to facilitate any • necessary emergency services during construction, procedures; and 6) a cash bond for street clean-up in the amount of -$2, 000. 00. • • Policy Nexus: Environmental Review Ordinance; WAC 197-11-960 B. 1; B. 2 ; B. 3.; B.4 ; B.7. =WAM : - RECOM'0 MFNDATIONS>:.>;;:.:;>:.;:<.>:;.: ThateERO:.;;iss:ue:.;:a:<.Det : nata:on:::::of:::>:<::M :;.;;;;f.o.l:l.owln >::>:c:ondi:t:i.on .:;a;;>:.;; :.;:::<.:<.;::.:.;:.;:.;;:.:;.::.;:.:;.:: 2 . That the applicant: a) provide a fully approved tree ,.preservation/landscaping plan in advance of issuance of site- preparation/building permits; b) refrain from tree 'cutting until preservation and landscaping plans have been approved and a ' vegetation management permit has been obtained. - 3 . That the applicant site all residential structures a minimum of eighty (80) feet to the east of the Puget Power Lines, in order to protect residents against environmental health impacts from • electromagnetic fields. • 4. That the applicant: a) provide standard off-site• improvements • (e.g. curbs, sidewalks, gutters, street lighting) ; ;and b) . reconstruct a portion northbound Aberdeen Avenue to widen the • . roadway so that through traffic is not impeded by vehicles turning left into the project site. All improvement and reconstruction plans are subject to approval by the Public Works Department in • advance of the issuance of 'site .preparation/building permits. 5. That the- applicant provide: a) a storm drainage 'management system, including (including 25/2 year collection/retention-basin, biofiltration and oil/water separation) ; and b) a .drainage release (easement)_ from the downstream property owner or an alternative . 1 • Technical Advisory- 'ommittee staff Report ,Sunset Garden Page 6 • February 23, 1990 • means of transporting the drainage over the property to the drainage basin. Plans should be subject to approval; by the Public Works Department in advance of issuance of site ; . preparation/building permits. . 6. That the proponent provide: a) an erosion control plan; b) a plan for wheel-washing of construction vehicles; c) a plan for periodic watering down of the site; d) a plan for hauling routes and hours of operation; e) a plan for right-of-way and on-site signage to facilitate any necessary emergency services during construction procedures; and f) a cash bond for strieet' clean-up in the amount of $2, 006. 00. These plans should be •approved by the Public Works Department, Fire Prevention Bureau, Police Department, Planning. Division and .Building Division in advance ;of issuance of •site preparation/building permits. • 1 In addition staff request: 1. That the applicant make a voluntary contribution of $9, 000. 00 • ($150 per unit x 60 units) for' improvements to area public recreation facilities. Note: At the time of site plan review, in order to achieve compliance with the Site ' Plan Review Ordinance, some modifications to plans for ' structural design (residential units, recreation areas, ;carports) will be recommended --including but not limited to provision of thematic integrity, selection of wood siding rather than vinyl, the addition of pedestrian walkways throughout the site, and relocation of the dumpster so that it is convenient, but does not disturb view corriidor.s. Revisions will also ,be recommended to the landscaping plan (e.g. - retention of additional trees at the perimeter of the site, increase in size, number and type of new plantings) , to the lighting' plan (to direct lighting to limit glare_ to adjacent sites) and for screening. Other improvements, such as interior insulation and landscaping maintenance bonds will also be required. Board of Public Works authorization will be necessary prior to construction of any roadway at a grade equal to or • greater than eight per cent. The proponent will also be; encouraged to introduce design elements on- this site which serve to identify Sunset Gardens as a separate and distinct development from nearby Sunset Downs Apartments, 1 ' < S r K wl Nc1NG DEPARTmErT.S.. :::::.:�: .................. :1!}{ :: ::�'}i:;ii:i}i:•ii'J�i:•ii:i:•i?:•ii:;:_i:::{.j}:.'�: •Y.:•}i: . }::};:.'riii:4}iiiiiii:• : ;:;::$}}': ,i:i}:i(•}i}}::::4iY:i?:i•5ii•: ;'.;;:.Var .ous:.;:.:C: t: ,:.;:.de artment' :have:::<::rev .ewed� .and<:::.c.omment:e:d<::: ��.o :.t :...::::>:;>:::::::::<:: 10 :::.:Y....::::::::P:::::::.:::: :::: .::::::::.:::::::::..:.�:::::::::.:.:::::: :::::::::::::::::::::.:::::::::::::..::::up..n.:the.::...::::..::::.:.:::: >: ro:j e:ct:: Thes.e.::..c:omment:s::::::»:s:ubm tted•::.:in :.. eb.ruar .::::.»;1:. ,9:0::>::: :': .;:.: ::.::;.::•;:«.:.:.:.::.;:.:.:::; LAND USE ' Police Department: Land Use: Fire Prevention Bureau: Land Use: Design. Engineering: Land Use: Traffic Engineering: Land Use: ' Utility Engineering: , Land Use: Parks and Recreation: Land Use: . Building Division: Land Use: • Current Planning Division: Land Use: Long Range Planning.: • Land Use: ENVIRONMENTAL • Technical Advisors Thmmittee Staff Report -Sunset Garden Page 7 February 23 , 1990 Police Department: Fire Prevention Bureau: Design Engineering: Traffic Engineering: Utility Engineering: Parks and Recreation: Building Division: Current Planning Division: Long Range Planning: RI iN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT; l'ARTMENT ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: U K, , J1 \' nau \bt 0 vs laK4 1 DATE CIRCULATED: JANUARY 25 , 1990 COMMENTS DUE: FEBRUARY 8 , 1990 EFC - 006 - 90 APPLICATION NO (S) : SA-006-90 PROPONENT: Dennis Riebe PROJECT TITLE: Sunset Gardens BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval for 60 unil multi-family residential complex on vacant site zoned for R=3 use . LOCATION: 909-915 Aberdeen Avenue N.E . SITE AREA 2 . 6 acres BUILDING AREA (gross) : ., 91 acre (approx. ) IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1 . Earth 2 . Air C� 3 . Water �'r" / 1-Iq0 4 . Plants o 1 Whe4-f (4o. k rt. pi Pi 5 . Animals ° k' LA KZ, 7' 6 . Energy & Natural Resources ° PhCG POS G kR. (ICJ cr ti 7 . Environmental Health - 8 . Land & Shoreline Use ° 9 . Housing 10 . Aesthetics ° ° o 11 . Light & Glare 12 . Recreation 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation 14 . Transportation 15 . Public Services o ° ° 16 . Utilities COMMENTS :() L } L L "O W\ T 0 5Neret UOf. LI.CI? t1J CA l KYZZD �Q 1 O MtVeArr (&.F Rt TO t,s3 ,e hl Wit ItuC4 rkZpo 1'! 1 ti i c k Foi\. rL ovs-ro �tp'rjo ,5e,14DI►J p hi . C) 1. %01 S F`cee, picc ink1 4 itbIlcK s"o y"idrE PcAvedic LAi11 '1`'0 ' ` , LA)E 3' " paroul I 144,. 1 2.sc Kv. petits. C l Ct< �..\s�r° ) We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal . 2 - ICf-q0 Signature of D4re for or Authorized Representative Date Rev. 6/88 RENT. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DE .TMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF- 006-90 APPLICATION NO (S) . : SA-006-90 PROPONENT: Riebe & Associates PROJECT TITLE: Sunset Gardens BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval for 60 unit multi-family residential complex on vacant site zoned for R-3 use . LOCATION: 909-915 Aberdeen Avenue N .E . TO: • PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU • POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION .<4.- SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P.M. ON FEBRUARY 8 , 1990 . REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: PL Ad..1 i)IAJ Cn O I O 4 S1 O t. APPROVED , APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED 0 . P Roo I 0 t. PeDeNit 1410 kdo t<kAiltS I `moosr1 f: 1bbOc9 , `' Iboa �4 ►'1 0. _.‘,,,, <( � ,k ept r I`r Lc-rt. 1. eA)0®IQ PLA KM �t 1tt T1 ;5 % Pt N i t\„ Z A cb-r0.KMG'. Loc.441Eik S14ouL.4) ►° to Pt cli0c Pciz..., 5,1, .M., ` . RCr mte1/4,l-1 z w1 ELL,1►k.J ( GA)014 ANO4}71.I `,�' 44‘. ,e,, ''t`i c E ) o 0 RIv ,w it C9N r7 VD N-Itsk, \c.ue. 1 Tt Yck.,W (4T" 1 O%, C' .i,4►'S,0 N.) F -C) i rii lo lam cF 9 Lk,IrbL I G, W Un K,a IS .k U I Rct.KJ .C. ' ' 6% S dy,U P e",.., R.CC-®W-"eivt) wooD SlbinaCp �(Z.li'PIicIZ rI+Actu l)1IQ\-ri„� ', ,\list(,, 15 PKoposcD'", Q..0 0 srt kl u f., Ntd? lrCWO SC Apt *TO . WL5`1 rup erc,N u 1 i\.1 e. �c,A. k.po ma's .� i C},�wi C Cr di R to S1�1 �o�r~,0 it 1 N RAFT E�-rt b i C) 4'�11 YG SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 6/88 -.---- . 1.,'0,L 2,- q - 9 0 RENTO JMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DER. 'MENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF- 006-90 APPLICATION NO (S) . : SA-006-90 PROPONENT: Riebe & Associates °; PROJECT TITLE: Sunset Gardens BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval for 60 unit multi-family residential complex on vacant site zoned for R-.3 use . LOCATION: 909-915 Alydeen Avenue N.E . TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P.M. ON FEBRUARY 8 , 1990 . REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: C14;ll cG� APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED Nu'RE SEpAK WAi6RNAiN ihf'RbVCr►Nts PcAtA5 PER C T‘f 5i 117'o:v5 (tir,:. (1E1,15 N GMS Lit _ PReutiINPS.Y trvickrY coMPOSM YL/4i 15 tJoT lk3noUED S(Ab\-\ m-FD �I�� OF WPT�{ZNt11hl� 1 CATTotJ c ?'ic6 moeit),11 .) VALVES r`i PlzccECt-nor•; 5i iviv, 1, \JPrW 15 J Wik'CY S6Ru3 . e-cc- must- E 61tow irrAt\tel) EUewPM ffS S 4-ttff Al3Vatt/ f� lju►?/ fl DATE C"Ct5. ) SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE 1pm REV. 6/88 FEE APPLICATION: 1 .DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIE HEET LJ ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET I I PLAN REVIEW ROUTING SLIP OTHER APPLICANT: . . JOB ADDRESS: �a _ '�� ���r,�_� �_.t �y�z.%: • '• NATURE OF WORK: ,' ) ) - . • PROPERTY MANAGEMENT - � -- 0'✓ DATE RECEIVED Comments Due BY PROPERTY MGMT. Comments or suggestions regarding this application should be provided in writing. Please provide comments to the Comm. Dev. Dept. (C.D'.D. ) by 5:00 p.m. on above date. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION X FEES APPLIED CANNOT APPLY FEES ❑ LEGAL DESCRIPTION NEED MORE INFORMATION ❑ SQUARE FOOTAGE ❑•FRONT FOOTAGE ❑ VICINITY MAP ' It is the intent of this development fee analysis to put the developer/owner on notice, that the fees quoted below will apply to the subject site upon development of the property. All quoted fees are due and payable at the time the construction permit is issued to install the on-site and off-site improvements (i .e. underground utilities, street improvements, etc. ) PROJECT COST LATECOMER LATECOMER AGREEMENT - WATER NO PER. FTG. FEE CITY HELD r •• ; PRIVATE 'DEVELOPER HELD ,l'f .z- )4/- LATECOMERS AGREEMENT - SEWER CITY HELD PRIVATE DEVELOPER HELD SPECIAL UTILITY CONNECTION CHARGE - WATER UNITS SUCC FEE Single family residential dwelling unit $300/lot x Apartment, Condo, each multiplex unit $175/ea. unit x Commercial/Industrial $.04/sq. ft. of property x SPECIAL UTILITY CONNECTION CHARGE - SEWER Single family residential dwelling unit $300/lot x Apartment, condo, each multiplex unit $175/ea. unit x %"'" �•" Commercial/Industrial $ .04/sq.ft. of property x SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT .("Hospital Area) WATER UNITS • SAD FEE DEVELOPMENTS WITH 1500 'GPM ;FIRE FLOWS OR LESS: Area Charge $0.034\p'er sq.ft. x • ' Frontage Charge $1.6A0 per front ft. x DEVELOPMENTS WITH GREATER THAN 1500 GPM FIRE FLOWS: Area Charge $0.,048 per\sq.ft. x Frontage Charge $18.00 'per front ft. x ---- / SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT (Honey Crk. Intercptr) - SEWER UNITS SAD FEE AREA CHARGES: / Residential dwelling units, apartments or equivalents; $25'0 per dwelling unit x Commercial development: $.05 per sq.ft. of dross site area x FRONT FOOTAGE CHARGES:/ \. $37. 19 per Front Ft. (on ea. side) x • $74.38 per fr•.ft. (prpty on both sides of imprv.) x • r�� �' :.�. :n �3 a . TOTAL: $1 ' _ V a The above quoted fees do NOT include inspection fees, side sewer permits, r/w- permit fees or the cost of water meters. • • )2 L' -A-�- / t \AiL/ Y' DATE - Signature of Director or Authorized Representative \ a.c dam . cry / • RENT'-- - COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DE 2TMENT ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: DATE CIRCULATED: JANUARY 25 , 1990 COMMENTS DUE: FEBRUARY 8 , 1990 EFC - 006 - 90 APPLICATION NO (S), : SA-006-90 PROPONENT: Dennis Riebe PROJECT TITLE: Sunset Gardens BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval for 60 unit multi-family residential complex on vacant site zoned for R-3 use. LOCATION: 909-915 Aberdeen Avenue N .E . (gross . 91 acre (approx. ) SITE AREA 2 . 6 acres BUILDING AREA (g ) � MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY ° 1 . Earth ° ° ° ° ° 2 . Air ' ° ° ° 3 . Water 4 . Plants ° ° ° 5 . Animals 6 . Energy &Natural Resources °--° 7 . Environmental Health____--:___:____:___-- ealth ,----° ° ° 8 . Land & Shoreline Use__________—:____:___________:_______--_ ° 9 . Housing °— 10 . Aesthetics ° ii . Light & Glare o 12 . Recreation ° 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation o_—° a 14 . Transportation --° °° 15 . Public Services °—�/ ° 16 . Utilities COMMENTS : 1-12Ce: ,'I.:'I.- 1)616 014 ATPrG‘E0 S)C-U LOVMCN'I A'?FUCAVGH E/iat) SNt � \- 1{' (1,et) o 6Qet.0121-1 r C=? Weel- ..-- , 6' We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those are in which we have expertise and have identifiedoareas ofy probable assessthipact c areas where additional information 1 needed tproposal . I 2 Atvatt, M'i-11.147 FC-1?). Date Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Rev. 6/ REi .;io DMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT L_'.c. MENT .., '�15: L./0 • ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET 10, r REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: ���(vy- WQ "`' DATE CIRCULATED: JANUARY 25 , 1990 COMMENTS DUE: FEBRUARY 8 , 1990 EFC - 006 - 90 APPLICATION NO (S) : SA-006-90 PROPONENT: Dennis Riebe PROJECT TITLE: Sunset Gardens BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval for 60 unit multi-family residential complex on vacant site zoned for R-3 use . . LOCATION: 909-915 Aberdeen Avenue N .E . SITE AREA 2 . 6 acres BUILDING AREA (gross) : . 91 acre (approx. ) IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth ° 2 . Air ° • 3 . Water ✓ ° 4 . Plants ° ° ° ° 5 . Animals ° ° 6 . Energy & Natural Resources ° 7 . Environmental Health ° 8 . Land & Shoreline Use ° ° 9 . Housing ° • 10 . Aesthetics ° 11 . Light & Glare ° ° ° 12 . Recreation ° 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ° • 14 . Transportation ° ° 15 . Public Services ° ° ° ° 16 . Utilities ° COMMENTS : ES m Ce m f+tii-S oil Me-'x f r/�y ej We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas • in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal . 'Ai; B -dcr4;6440 'el-IL- Signature of Director or Authorized Representative i� Date Rev. 6/88 'Al �i .4T _.dr. • RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARIrmOT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF- 006-90 APPLICATION NO (S) . : SA-006-90 PROPONENT: Riebe & Associates PROJECT TITLE: Sunset Gardens BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval for 60 unit multi-family residential complex on vacant site zoned for R-3 use. LOCATION: 909.-915 Aberdeen Avenue N .E . TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P.M. ON FEBRUARY 8 , 1990 . REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS /' NOT APPROVED r `' - /11— V40nn 0rd4--r fo c// direL-j- s-form rtino17- aLrass .'' ErPfers17, �, 6 a (mod D'C( WA s 4.K4+or 511Ci 11 be (n s 411 Il e-o( (f 0-r Criy v rl F1' / � p Sr`� Cl��'ale?r 6 , 1�Prh`�a n ✓rf°'� d al u s D y i o,/' '�o 2 yeAr des, Yt 7A e Re ,, a,n 0,1 i vim-`� �51011 66 - p �t b� c � Q T �,4,o., v9 l v `� sh�i IN1� d e u Ii r�e rese r / � S� yet y 56-3 did �1 h or c �iWO ��✓il g 1° � th d-4 Pis 5 I -fig Coy }�-r,1 wi(I be ui � �1"- ph ' ' �l[A,�(� �'fihl nfq Er03�v/1 seG�►'Y�+'i n (oi r t/�C.�v� ``��C Pi- DATE 2.1 5 /0 . SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 6/88 RENTON MMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPr� ZENT ,"''v; , ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET t' '.S;G(> 1I REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Se1� U" U 1• 1`\1+'e --,.1;' y�i r•` DATE CIRCULATED: JANUARY 25 , 1990 COMMENTS DUE: FEBRUARY 8 , 1990 EFC - 006 - 90 . . APPLICATION NO (S) : SA-006-90 • PROPONENT:. Dennis Riebe PROJECT TITLE : Sunset Gardens • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval 'for 60 unit multi-family residential complex on vacant site zoned for R-3 use. LOCATION: 909-9.15 Aberdeen Avenue N .E . • SITE AREA 2 . 6 acres BUILDING AREA (gross) : . 91 acre (approx. ) IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION . IMPACT , IMPACT NECESSARY 1 . Earth* ✓ ° 2 . Air ° ° 3 . Water ✓ ° ° ° • 4 . Plants ° o ° ° 5 . Animals ° ° o ° ° 6 . Energy & Natural Resources ° ° 7 . Environmental Health ° 8 . Land & Shoreline Use ° o ° ° 9 . Housing ° 10 . Aesthetics ° 11 . Light & Glare ° 12 . Recreation ° 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ° ° 14 . Transportation ° 15 . Public Services ° 16 . Utilities of . . COMMENTS : We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal . A„..„,%. --x/.. =- a ,,_ ? ..e /9 9, . ,Signature of Director orauthorized Representative /.. Date 4) Rev. 6/88 • RENTON iITJNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPA. ENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF- 006-90 , APPLICATION NO (S) . : SA-006-90 • PROPONENT: Riebe & Associates PROJECT TITLE: Sunset Gardens • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks . site plan approval for 60 unit multi-family residential complex on vacant site zoned for R-3 use. LOCATION: 909-91.5 A1erdeen Avenue N .E . TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : ENGINEERING DIVISION • TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : UTILITIES 'ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE . LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P.M. ON FEBRUARY 8 , 1990 . REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: ] (..1A- ' ,�,g APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS tT APPROVED • ,G_...CE /L� ,/ , / c,-. ,-1.rv(Yv�/ % }.4 E'�,e,,,c:.-- 7,0yte ,i• / ��= iGvY�� /� �Gf G�c^, f /rya /J �r��,L`v —ter,_ 0 'rL,- -.. ,o.Cv.,.c l°%. 7;46.c /f ( , /-.,/!,.r,^C,/ D,/ //oy2F-`ice G •'` -, -- J 01_P/Pt I. 4.,''.. /O, /..:n. j---'',.,` 7 • - A.::C.. 7 , /�/ /% -c-41.-,t" r J i. � 74" .S=" DATE C� 1 P�-CS GN� URE OFIRECT��O`�' OR I T F� REPRESENTATIVE REV. 6/88 REN`i.._. JOMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEt• CMENT ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW_ SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT:/telimit;]Lukm4V\. Transportation Services Division DATE CIRCULATED: JANUARY 25 , 1990 COMMENTS DUE: F L, �!u;•-!- EFC — 006 — 90 i'L.X0R!`��t` G.' APPLICATION NO (S) : SA-006-90 JAN 2 6 1990 PROPONENT:. Dennis Riebe ` l� PROJECT TITLE: Sunset Gardens BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval for 60 unit multi-family residential complex on vacant site zoned for R-3 use. LOCATION: 909-915 Aberdeen Avenue N .E . SITE AREA 2 . 6 acres BUILDING AREA (gross) : . 91 acre (approx. ) IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1 . Earth ° 2 . Air ° 3 . Water . ° ° ° 4 . Plants 0 5 . Animals ° 6 . Energy & Natural Resources ° 7 . Environmental Health ° 8 . Land & Shoreline Use ° 9 . Housing ° 10 . Aesthetics ° ii . Light & Glare ° 12 . Recreation 0 ° 13 . Historic :6( Cultural Preservation ° 14 . Transportation 0 15 . Public Services 1/-• ° 16 . Utilities COMMENTS : Off-site improvements plans required for street improvements * Curb, gutters and sidewalk * Street lighting to City standards * i'icrninq of Northbound lane on Aberdeen to allow thru Northbound traffic passage around left-turning vehicles to driveway. We' have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal . (_(/ /7 <3 Signature of Director or thorized Repres 'tative 1:-'' Dat; V' Rev. 6/8 8 , (Transportation Services Division l r' RENT(.. . MMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEP.t PENT `�(� J DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF- 006-90 APPLICATION NO (S) . : SA-006-90 JAN2B 1990 PROPONENT: Riebe & Associates PROJECT TITLE: Sunset Gardens BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval for 60 unit multi-family residential complex on vacant site zoned for R-3 use . LOCATION: 909-915 Abexdeen Avenue N.E . TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: • ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : UTILITIES -ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P.M. ON FEBRUARY 8 , 1990 . REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: re.D 5' % )\)jS APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED Off-site improvement plans required for street improvements * Curb, gutters and sidewalk * Street Lighting to City standards * Widening of Northbound lane on Aberdeen to allow thru Northbound passage around left turning vehicles to driveway. �4 :., J/ DATE r!/ 7/,v SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR THORIZED REPRESENTATIVE / REV. 6/88 • RENT.,. OMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DE1, 'MENT `r,.- ; ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET <4!. i��4.9 ;'bry0/1, REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: ,�1�1 ,.'.. "a Ir.... O ~ 4:1f4N DATE CIRCULATED: JANUARY 25 , 19 9 0 COMMENTS DrE-:--FEBRU.ARY_�8 , 1'9-9;0h I , EFC - 006 - 90 i I r I APPLICATION NO (S) : SA-006-90 I it JAN 2 5 1990 PROPONENT: Dennis Riebe1 i PROJECT TITLE: Sunset Gardens ,,.:.. -,.., "^'`"j L._ BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval-""'f^ 60 unit multi-family residential complex on vacant site zoned for R-3 use. LOCATION: 909-915 Aberdeen Avenue N . E . SITE AREA 2 . 6 acres BUILDING AREA (gross) : . 91 acre (approx. ) IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1 . Earth ° 2 . Air ° ° 3 . Water ° 4 . Plants ° o ° ° 5 . Animals ° 6 . Energy & Natural Resources ° 7 . Environmental Health 0 ° O ° 8 . Land & Shoreline Use ° 9 . Housing z.--'-- ° 10 . Aesthetics ° ° 11. Light & Glare ° 12 . Recreation ° ° 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ° ° 14 . Transportation ° 15 . Public Services ° ° 16 . Utilities ° COMMENTS : We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable, impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal . 6 l C _ C... ' ',LG i? (_c..? - �.J LG7 �,L.} Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date Rev. 6/88 RENTCI1 IMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPh 'LENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF- 006-90 APPLICATION NO (S) . : SA-006-90 PROPONENT: Riebe & Associates PROJECT TITLE: Sunset Gardens BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval for 60 unit multi-family residential complex on vacant site zoned for R-3 use. LOCATION: 909-915 Alerdeen Avenue N.E . TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES"ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION , PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P.M. ON FEBRUARY 8 , 1990 . REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: t ai tcli�ryq APPROVED APPROVED WITH )CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED • ,- /15 L. DC � ' /"Cam`l.Lc, / 1_ !,2'"� '� 6-� �3�� cs� DATE SIGNATURE OI . DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 6/88 REN'_ :N , )MMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DI-, MENT %'4,4, ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET �A;oNN REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: 1 (I� _y'� 6`yl r .... < 7Qrin :,,v DATE CIRCULATED: JANUARY 25 , 1990 • COMMENTS DUE: FEBRUARY 8 , 199.,0P.... EFC - 006 - 90 • . • APPLICATION NO (S) : SA-006-90 • PROPONENT:. Dennis Riebe • PROJECT TITLE: Sunset Gardens • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval for 60 unit .multi-family residential complex on vacant site zoned for R-3 use. LOCATION: 909-915 Aberdeen Avenue N .E . SITE AREA 2 . 6 acres BUILDING AREA (gross) : . 91 acre (approx. ) IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1 . Earth ° 2 . Air ° 3 . Water ° o ° ° 4 . Plants ° 5 . Animals ° o ° ° . 6 . Energy & Natural• Resources ° ° o ° ° • 7 . Environmental Health ° 8 . Land & Shoreline Use ° . 9 . Housing ° ° ° 10 . Aesthetics ° ' 11 . Light & Glare ° 12 . Recreation X ° • o ° ° 13 . Historic &Cultural Preservation 14 . Transportation ° 15 . Public Services ° ° ° ° 16 . Utilities ° ° COMMENTS : -' .:.J.� �.... -l � ..A:s-j JLGG-G G ��i4j.,,.L1� /,�---_ •.ti ram• / 6/1 —(. > -� ./�/ifs'c— -,DGt t • r wivi c i4L11- 2-L.t!. f -- 41'l' i- -/ cf'-r: .v....l.,f .;J..s�'�-:C,Gv(..;:� /J--�... � y " �G � � vl�� Q�✓r-..e-z �iJ'7t�y -•</ / f j-c . .....- 1 ��...L v dam-" 6"(�1Q.�,�_�-ry..�y-�?- G(i/�f�G�Y,9 �GG.L.-.,..->`.-.v..-.r'� �l/� �r !'•a 1.x-.r-4f.f..r.-1,irYi/.l' (!./%%( /.7��- .c2, , -9 I We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal:'. 7 Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date . Rev. 6/88 RENT._, �.:A:MUNITY DEVELOPMENT DE1--c; . ENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF- 006-90 APPLICATION NO (S) . : SA-006-90 PROPONENT: Riebe & Associates PROJECT TITLE: Sunset Gardens BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval for 60 unit multi-family residential complex on vacant site zoned for R-3 use. LOCATION: 909-915 Aherdeen Avenue N.E . TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: . UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P.M. ON FEBRUARY 8 , 1990 . REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED DATE SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 6/88 RENT ..., )MMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DE.. MENT ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET ''`'1-F' v 4',.. !v �!o REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: brill 1 It1 1Pla %�+l�r :% v .,;•,_, ?.J7U DATE CIRCULATED: JANUARY 25 , 1990 COMMENTS DUE: FEBRUAR >,1990 p r„�y� 3rn 4;.t-k EFC - 006 - 90 APPLICATION NO (S) : SA-006-90 :.: -'E; ';,;•., PROPONENT:. Dennis Riebe r PROJECT TITLE: Sunset Gardens BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval for 60 unit multi-family residential complex on vacant site zoned for R-3 use . LOCATION: 909-915 Aberdeen Avenue N .E . SITE AREA 2 . 6 acres BUILDING AREA (gross) : . 91 acre (approx. ) IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1 . Earth ° ° ° ° 2 . Air ° 3 . Water ° 4 . Plants ° 5 . Animals ° ° ° ° 6 . Energy , & Natural Resources. ° 7 . Environmental Health yr 8 . Land & Shoreline Use ° 9 . Housing ° 10 . Aesthetics 0 11. Light & Glare ° 12 . Recreation 4' ° 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation 14 . Transportation ° 15 . Public Services ° ° ° 16 . Utilities ° COMMENTS : e""'"4Jr". ihL t ry EFF�T.› 0c L.tUINb 1-o'L'•bee.. 1/44,4lst-4 UO`'r44.e- Tr26.V5K10.ia., i-,M,QS ae-el.S T'O e totem l o a,/ -,-E+P. c. ? ►sra� cd, eke 7-4s.4s 60,cvLv. 3e' (esP.cw w).6 1,tvuL, eb `re, F 9 te � LTS. ,,, ,,,,,„.1 �// sZgoo Suov.-c 3e gvAwmvz, ,:.L,z- SP•Firr `t i Cr.Pk. t coUs,v-tA2an o v L, AS Rtoeszry o,J A' �r,J Ae�l /"1 �lc�v � I-to wt,i../ We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal . / z777o Signature o Director or Authorized Representative Dat . G Rev. 6/88 RENTS MMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEL [ENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET:: , ,.,:,,;;; ECF- 006-90 APPLICATION NO (S) . : SA-006-90 , PROPONENT: Riebe & Associates PROJECT TITLE: Sunset Gardens BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval for 60 unit multi-family residential complex on vacant site zoned for R-3 use. LOCATION: 909-915 Axdeen Avenue N .E . TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : UTILITIES 'ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE U'. LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P.M. ON FEBRUARY 8 , 1990 . REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION:II APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED � aar�► for-( (9"r'T1-t@' 15'LC?t,s. L S C.1-" 4). '[-ma ` S LTC T 1 I I aVtLltiLC. 1)6btl-4 lM1\t.r'.1,sen04. GMiTttAt s',env(cvS L"t''m``i mF .{bar 'I'pau, fir},,j IS rl- 't1Z6II(-.41`-‘._. -rc o �2_ Fge"N. �^`� OP t�-S E,Tao VlS t 3r_.e Va2 atera'`«re'. EeAelz-L'.+`-'�.r'1 e.ocess tS 'nero..n,,....r �1 koS- r' 1-b17.1-o us -r„ ... t 5 -nits oK ,,.,/ r✓i r tam ? 5 t -P 4 vN�F �c, a _ , '. I t�.1e.ks m2' D s carAl V PLA13 5 tk"L)r_-P `M Pe PLx1.„1,.._ T S e3 u,..m tin L_ 4,..._______ DATE / Z q i o SIGNATURE OF DIRE TOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 6/88 p REr, _JT )MMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DL-'2 MENT N ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET `.''V 2 6, 04, 7% REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: ` 1re— `1-CY1 6V1 - `k-.....4T u- '>,r J B DATE CIRCULATED: JANUARY 25 , 1990 COMMENTS DUE: FEBRUARY 8 , J9.9- 0 EFC - 006 - 90 RENTON FIRE DEPT. APPLICATION NO (S) : SA-006-90 PIRE PREVENTION BUREAU PROPONENT Dennis Riebe ..iAN Z. 0 1990 PROJECT TITLE: Sunset Gardens RECEIVED BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval for 60 unit multi-family residential complex on vacant site zoned for R-3 use. LOCATION: 909-915 Aberdeen Avenue N .E . SITE AREA 2 . 6 acres BUILDING AREA (gross) : . 91 acre (approx. ) IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY ° ° 1 . Earth ° o ° ° 2 . Air ° 0 ° ° ° 3 . Water ° ° ° o ° ° 4 . Plants ° ° ° 5 . Animals ° ° o ° ° 6 . Energy & Natural Resources o ° 7 . Environmental Health ° ° ° 8 . Land & Shoreline Use ° 9 . Housing ° ° o 10 . Aesthetics ° ° o ° ° 11 . Light & Glare ° ° ° 12 . Recreation ° ° ° 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ° 14 . Transportation 0° 15 . Public Services "`/// ° o ° 16 . Utilities ° COMMENTS : We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal . � • ,ZS l /9 Signature of Director or Authorized Representative to Rev. 6/88 NIMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DhrA] ENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF- 006-90 APPLICATION NO (S) . : SA-006-90 PROPONENT: Riebe & Associates PROJECT TITLE: Sunset Gardens BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval for 60 unit multi-family residential complex on vacant site zoned for R-3 use. LOCATION: 909-915 Alexdeen Avenue N .E . TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ' ENG. DIVISION • FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION • • SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT • OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P.M. ON FEBRUARY 8 , 1990 . . REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: , APPROVED iZAPPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED Any development and/or construction shall comply with current Fire and Building Codes and Ordi- nances. A second means of approved access is required. Fire D rtment access roads/lanes shall be paved minimum width 20'; minimum height 13' 6". Yes o Preliminary fire flow calculations show a fire flow.of ar ,, D-0-0 is required. . hydrants with a minimum flow of / o ° gpm each is required. Primary hydrant is required to be within /6 D feet of the structure. Secondary hydrants are required to be within feet of the structure. An approved automatic sprinkler system is required to protect the total structure. Yes No All fire department access roads are to be paved and installed prior to construction. Yes �No All fire hydrants are required to be installed and approved prior to construction. Yes 6---1No .DATE 1,j//??0 SIGN TURF OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 6/88 RCQUIRrD FIRE FLOW CALCULATIONS 1 . HAZARD IDENTIFICATION INFORMATION • NAME _SG/A/St-T �•%� ' L--l✓s U.B-.C. CLASS OF BUILD ADDRESS ' • ?U 9.- 9//, - / '3�,eD25z5A) !20e-• ALE, FIRE MGMT AREA 2. DETERMINE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION - CLASS (CIRCLE ONE) : I - I I IV III / v FIRE-RESISTIVE NON-COMBUSTIBLE • ORDINARY WOOQ_EWE MIXED (NOTE: IF "MIXED", SEE SPECIAL INSTRUCTION FOR AREA AND BASIC FIRE FLOW) l 3 . DETERMINE AREA: 14 GROUND FLOOR AREA: FT2 (A) g/��' NUMBER OF STORIES: • • TOTAL BUILDING AREA: / , S 4. DETERMINE BASIC .FIRE FLOW FROM TABLE I31, USING AREA CA) : , O C)C) GPM (B) 5. DETERMINE OCCUPANCY FACTOR ADJUSTMENT: ADJUSTMENT: , 7-5-6 GPM (C) IF LOW HAZARD, SUBTRACT UP TO 25% OF CB): IF HIGH HAZARD,, ADD UP TO 25% OF CB) 6. COMPUTE SUB-TOTAL (B+C) : _ CIF B+C IS LESS THAN 500 GPM, INSERT 500 GPM) Z,Z ..S (,, GPM CD) 7. DLILRMINE SPRINKLER ADJUSTMENT: ADJUSTMENT: - 1 / 7 f.: • GPM (E) CIF CCmPLETELY SPRINKLERED, SUBTRACT UP TO 50% OF CD): IF LIGHT HAZARD OCCUPANCY AND FIRE RESISTIVE OR NON-COMBUSTIBLE CONSTRUCTION, SUBTRACT UP TO 75% OF CD). 8. DETERMINE EXPOSURE ADJUSTMENT: USING THE TABLE AT LEFT AS A GUIDE, ENTER THE SEPARATION AND ADJUSTMENT FOR EACH OF THE "FOUR FACES" OF THE BUILDING IN THE TABLE AT THE RIGHT: SEPARATION MAX. ADJUSTMENT EXPOSURE SEPARATION ACT. ADJ. 0 - 10 25% MAX. NORTH Fs' ADD /O % 11 - 30 20% MAX. EAST //O' ADD OS-- % • 31 - 60 ' . 15% MAX. SOUTH • /2 ' ADD ZO % 61 -100 10% MAX. • ' WEST /OS' ADD d) S' % 101 -150 5% MAX. TOTAL % OF ADJUSTMENT 150 OR 4-HR WALL 0% MAX. (NOT TO EXCEED 75%) : l/() % (TOTAL % ADJUSTMENT TIMES CD) ADJ/2'TMENT: 4- cc a CD GPM (F) 9. DETERMINE ROOF AND SIDING COVERING ADJUSTMENT: • CIF SHINGLE COVERING, ADD 500 GPM) ADJUSTMENT: GPM (G) 0. COMPUTE ESTIMATED FIRE FLOW REQUIRED: -• CIF D+E+F+G IS LESS THAN 500 GPM, INSERT 500 GPM) (IF D+E+F+G IS GREATER THAN 12,000 GPM,' INSERT 12,433 GPM) Z� �' CD+E+F+G) REQUIRED FIRE FLOW: ( Oc)C) GPM (H) ' �; ,1 ! _ .1. SIGNED:. -� FATE , :•./ 2' •S /�96 C • • NOTICE OF PENDING SITE PLAN APPROVAL RENTON,WAS.HINGTON A Site Plan Application has been filed and accepted with the Current Planning Division of the Community Development Department. The following briefly describes the application and the necessary Public Approvals. DESCRIPTION: Sunset Gardens . SA-006-90 • Applicant seeks site plan approval for 60 unit multi-family residential complex on vacant site zoned for R-3 use. ' GENERAL LOCATION: 909-915 Aberdeen Avenue N.E. PUBLIC APPROVALS: o Environmental Review o Site Plan Approval o Building Permit • • The application can be reviewed in the Current Planning Division located on the third floor of Renton City Hall. Comments will be accepted anytime prior to Public Hearings, during Public Hearings, or prior to an administrative site plan approval. For further information on the application or dates of final action by the City, please contact the Community Development Department, Current Planning. Division at 235-2550. , ii • ` I 6 1� 1 rasld.n..ri.37 -L vaoant land o U ' Si vacant land ¢7/ •f7 -. 71.13 / I v-��st4 t E 13 n ��± / / v' 0.33 Ac.8 r..ld■nca �- 1;21 __# 1 6 d rv0.351�C.0 9 t r. ldanoa .� 1' . � rldno J , I 11°1°,1: 9 �`rf5, _., hcys .. y�- _ � J ,-; n .,240.01 r _ _- --- - I I apartment �.• -. vaoant ,land •vacant land r` 3 e (�58 6 L.,; --C:• ;/,'/A / / '" ` %G , / <, - l 1 1 ,, ���/ i 601i •rai.? Tnaa o 6 •.\ 1•. Q //// �' / • Amoy :' • r,.,f, '•'� �' - • n VT\ //,',/../ / / //0 2/(0? 0 - 7. // ' /� I �O ra a a.3.0 woo.? / ... , ?6 /// / :•75 m raaldana. L'� 5� 73 apartments 7 -_ v C 8 0( Is* ' 1 0.9Q AC. �i Z zing 7� ^r�r.(d.n•` rraidanc 1 rn v 9 � ®4ri m FA1 ' - e r ..� I , • vacant land •- _ * ry�aidno. / I iI� O r 'St2 Ai mu._- 1 I .'.CO _ lJr. CF / mil. a� �T t Sc Z. v7ac,ant Ian c a 3' raald.nor rJ 1 2 , ti� 7i9 d� (825] sCo .•.;�,'.,1 1" L„r 14.8 :6 t"?a ri�' 1 (� v1.r < ? ii` 24 raaldsnoa 21 ,' i-w cif L^ . ' 4^! 4 � �., :o } cant land :.,, r 8LL.I •61 •:-''1 `'' .. a Z 1-- 260. 79. iJ°• !_ten to • � '3 lol '8^ ;..--eisidrncr Q RI I 9,En - rarld.no�C - r-aaldano at-p_ -3�i„��t?� r._- '6.ti1 ''� a 19 I:::::::::::.... . Z 'T vacant land j ,,, 71 M ,•I 1 '-c-, 6 X cant Ian 2 1, 2 • 1 �� _Sc aidancl i64 75 ' t, /• .. LLl E -0 iduafnsesr r ! _ f0 6� I o ''c 1 �a dlr�• = ti� F 1- . .. ...... .................................................. M ETIN N .TI E C February 23,1990 To: Paul Lumbert Mark Isaacson Glen Gordon Sam Chastain Penny Bryant Jim Hanson From: Don Erickson, Chairm • <<Meetin`'Datecr>FRIDAY,FEBR ARY 2`: 1;::;: Agenda is attached below. • • TIME/KEY PARTICIPANTS NEW SUNSET GARDENS SA-006-90 (Proj.Mgr.Lenora Blauman) Applicant seeks site plan approval for 60 unit multi-family residential complex on vacant site zoned for R-3 use. Property located at 909-915 Aberdeen Avenue N.E. FETTERLY SHORT PLAT AND VARIANCE SHPL 008-90 (Proj.Mgr.Lenora Bluaman) Applicant•is seeking to subdivide a.93 acre parcel into three lots for future development with single-family residences. The property is zoned for single-family residential use (R-1) and is undeveloped. Property is located at 956 Field Avenue N.E. ;_+ • NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON HEARING EXAMINER RENTON, WASHINGTON A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS ON THE SECOND FLOOR OF CITY HALL, RENTON, WASHINGTON, ON MARCH 6, 1990 AT 9:00 • A.M. TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS: VALLEY.MEDICAL CENTER PARKING GARAGE/PHASE II ECF; CU-006-89 Applicant seeks approval of a conditional use permit for Phase II of the Valley Medical Center Parking Garage. Phase II has 253,445 square feet and will provide an additional 797 parking stalls. The property is located at 400 South 43rd Street, at the northern portion of the Valley Medical Center Campus. Legal descriptions of the files noted above are on file in the Renton Community Development Department. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT THE PUBLIC HEARING ON MARCH 6, 1990 AT 9:00 A.M. TO EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS. Published: February 22, 1990 Account #51067 41 ENT ON CITY OF RENTON DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor Planning Division February 19, 1990 Romulo Almeda 400 South 43rd Street Renton, WA 98055 RE: VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER PARKING GARAGE/PHASE II ECF; CU-006-89 Dear Mr. Almeda: A public hearing before the City of Renton Land Use Hearing Examiner has been scheduled for Tuesday, March 6 , 1990. The public hearing commences at 9:00 a.m. in the Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall. The applicant or representative(s) of the applicant is required to be present at the public hearing. A copy of the staff report will be mailed to you before the hearing. If you have any questions, please call 235-2550. 771y, Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator DKE:mr • 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2550 CITY OF RENTON 4 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor Planning Division January 25, 1990 Dennis Riebe 3025 112th Ave. N.E., #100 Bellevue, WA 98004 Re: Sunset Gardens, 909/951 Aberdeen Avenue N.E. ECF;SA-006-90 Dear Mr. Riebe: The Community Development Department has formally accepted the above referenced application for preliminary review. It is tentatively scheduled for consideration by the Technical Advisory Committee on February 23, 1990. Within three days of that review you will be notified in writing that: 1) your application is complete and has been scheduled for environmental review and determination, or 2) that additional information is required to continue processing your application for environmental review. If you have any questions, please contact Lenora Blauman of our office at 235-2550. Sincerely, vaio)t. Donald.K. Erickson, MCP Chief, Current Planning DKE/mr • 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2550 REE....:N COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT L—ARTMENT ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: LU R K 1L a��I'V 1�t)1L10t�1 1 DATE CIRCULATED: JANUARY 25, 1990 COMMENTS DUE: FEBRUARY 8 , 1990 EFC - 006 - 90 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-006-90 . PROPONENT: Dennis Riebe PROJECT TITLE: Sunset Gardens BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval for 60 unit multi-family residential complex on vacant site zoned for R-3 use. LOCATION: 909-915 Aberdeen Avenue N.E. SITE AREA 2 . 6 acres BUILDING AREA (gross) : . 91 acre (approx. ) IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth 0 0 ° 2 . Air ° 3 . Water 0 ° O 4 . Plants ° 5. Animals °I VI�4® 6. Energy & Natural Resources ° Q I.*Ca àOIt pl►2.n/5 7. Environmental Health wieeo ,ptkwl s 8 . Land & Shoreline Use PIto post� c hR Pant►; • I4(10103 _ 9. Housing _ 10. Aesthetics 0 ° ° 11. Light & Glare ° 12 . Recreation ° 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ° ° O 14 . Transportation 0 ° ° ° ° 15. Public Services 0 ° 0 16. Utilities ° COMMENTS:0 60 Nieto ,IMO'N O elO,EftiOrt LICQNI IIV(O MALL kV= 'TO be ;I%P.Its 0/514ICltoc f0 Nekite4rGLArkte 17) 1% 16t4 1"k* PiwP6lTI tr:� eXIS'tIN4 Ttkee5 h too *ME mktwitieR. . or Tt+'u S1i t• .tanj t t c pamq� i ro Loevo ukpliUtp NAN , tS.$o'. /� 5%Pc.,0 PrcctP9r*bLE "A1611C14 1"0 rIs P PL, pciaort Ltrutslio 11 v)esT ?' C t►v,tiel hum palti ist. lb 230 Kv PEIZ CtitCK LAW . Pkokliati a4000 cask %mew ekt. rvtp ftoui. We- have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. r 2-R-90 Signature of Air for or Authorized Representative Date Rev. 6/88 RENTL, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEP TMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET . • ECF- 006-90 APPLICATION NO(S) . : SA-006-90 PROPONENT: Riebe & Associates PROJECT TITLE: Sunset Gardens BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks,. site plan approval for 60 unit multi-family residential complex on vacant site zoned for R-3 use. • LOCATION: 909-915 Aberdeen Avenue N.E. . ' TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: - ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING' DATE: . UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU • • POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION. SHORT RANGE • ' LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT ' OTHERS: . COMMENTS 'OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON FEBRUARY 8; 1990. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: PLWNU'\14 OlOISlOt • APPROVED V,4APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED P1 ov 10 t P er llw , t-kw. 1tV Piton)/ e �`it�g'rrrL r� LO1JC0310 PLA I t `sMete MEW; owto R+4 toE . AVJE UL w !TN : toes i cof,RbSS1Vg Twee, ate,: 13. E 1"0w6e , A • 00'r0't Gt. LocKER sI4out..D I'y PrtouloW pots, eskf j-�f�1�cR'Tw►+EA�� CZAAJELLihi0 'ITIM 14rvi PI.E STomvit tp p c i) , VRly b C•Nth l`r 1ckuerTO1t O t4T 106. Perafvu Io,J FP 1 Th ) /soo tares of pkAr6Lic. Wank& IS Rteouivt,0 T0 i'A.t,et4 IyIU 0% SWpL.. mcpwirreob w0o0 SI DIA*0 R FITI4 RR 'r��a.I v l�►`I'�. s l om, g, R.5 pitorisco, MopCAk'hrely NCB Lc AA)ScApt To wtsr oiwpeity Liinle Epp c,NtIory'S . Jam.e tr/eCY(4R, . S\skOut..0 14V . INMRA tittb KINyGNl SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR PiUTHORIED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 6/88 i VW`•Q� 2' q 'a l0 N., REN1'u1. COMMUNITY/ DEVELOPMENT DE.z«aTMENT ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: (odey u4-,tl DATE CIRCULATED: JANUARY 25, 1990 COMMENTS DUE: FEBRUARY 8 , 1990 EFC - .006 - 90 I . APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-006-90 PROPONENT: Dennis Riebe PROJECT TITLE: Sunset Gardens BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval for 60 unit multi-family residential complex on vacant site zoned for R-3 use. LOCATION: 909-915 Aberdeen Avenue N .E . SITE AREA 2 . 6 acres BUILDING AREA (gross) : . 91 acre (approx. ) IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1., Earth ° 2 . Air ° s • 3 . Water ° ° O ° 4 . Plants ° ° ) o \ o 5. Animals ° 6. Energy & Natural Resources ° ° O o 7. Environmental Health ° o ° o 8 . Land & Shoreline Use ° 9 . Housing ° • 10. Aesthetics ° 11. Light & Glare ° 12 . Recreation ° 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation iI 14 . Transportation ° 15. Public Services . . ° O O O 16. Utilities r X ° "COMMENTS: 1 f 6010M613 ow Am at pm um fr41 mcicAosti Teiico sfer Arm-coo oevexpwr „weer- We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. AVM/ k#141/1 F. 2, t gqo Signature of Director. or Authorized Representative Date Rev. 6/88 J RENTUD. •"COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEE -=rMENT c/414w nYc��®��/3 DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET pea ,r®A,� ECF- 006-90 ' APPLICATION NO(S), . : SA-006-90 6 ® �'990 PROPONENT: Riebe & Associates 414® PROJECT TITLE: Sunset Gardens BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval for 60 unit multi-family residential complex on vacant site zoned for R-3 use. LOCATION: ' 909-915 .A1xdeen Avenue N,E . TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT " SCHEDULED ERC DATE: ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE • LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON FEBRUARY 8, 1990. , ti REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: WireAr APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS X NOT APPROVED * IE1aiRe 36?ARA1g' 1OKF MA-01 iMPRbveti 3 V1A►J5 PER Cif 51-ANWARPS eft DLWEI,oP61 S 6 E N S i aH of C'1( Ui1 UTi Cs . QREdji gny t TiuTY LOM poS)TE ftA►J i5 NoT Aff12000 As 3t4 riTTED - yi�� of uipioroimw, - ' 1,0 k'IfokJ liZr ktpeftrerS • VALVES • ME Pizacecrte,14 5(1R+4.1I1.LEY7. VAut.TS Ujp StR.Otfr3 . .. 61C Mum- 8C SfowN 5E9 11-1Thehe9 c eUeWPM6tc Ms S lifer. )//-' AWIAL/ (d un/ P DATE - Fee. 2, )a 90 SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE ipm REV. 6/88 OVA kA /Z94o ii3oc..4, • FEE APPLICATION: ,' DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIE..-::iiEET MI ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET C.1 PLAN REVIEW ROUTING SLIP d OTHER . �DA .. d7 90 APPLICANT: 4,244.a",(24,t_d_x-vii pr-e-plait JOB ADDRESS: gag- 9is G2..r,! . y/. NATURE OF WORK: /o, a' 0/34,14) )1 -11-€: --54-41/7 IX PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 01- S—90 DATE RECEIVED Comments Due BY PROPERTY MGMT. /— (9- 90 Comments or suggestions regarding this application should be provided in writing. Please provide comments to the Comm. Dev. Dept. (C.D.D.) by 5:00 p.m. on above date. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION C?4,0-10.41 )440-7,ep.teal- 0 FEES APPLIED CANNOT APPLY FEES 0 LEGAL DESCRIPTION NEED MORE INFORMATION CISQUARE FOOTAGE 0 FRONT FOOTAGE Q VICINITY MAP It is the intent of this development fee analysis to put the developer/owner on notice, that the fees quoted below will apply to the subject site upon development of the property. All quoted fees are due and payable at the time the construction permit is issued to install the on-site and off-site improvements (i .e. underground utilities, street improvements, etc.) PROJECT COST LATECOMER LATECOMER AGREEMENT - WATER NO PER. FTG. FEE CITY HELD PRIVATE DEVELOPER HELD . 97S G'�-a o t r. G �-1 `,. ^ ?, � t',BI ly re,ia-" l -c )!•G. LATECOMERS AGREEMENT - SEWER CITY HELD — 0— PRIVATE DEVELOPER HELD _p SPECIAL UTILITY CONNECTION CHARGE - WATER UNITS SUCC FEE Single family residential dwelling unit $300/lot x Apartment, Condo, each multiplex unit $175/ea. unit x L,,Q 043simee i4 Commercial/Industrial $.04/sq. ft. of property x SPECIAL UTILITY CONNECTION CHARGE - SEWER Single family residential dwelling unit $300/lot x Apartment, condo, each multiplex unit $175/ea. unit x 400 41/q._500. ®a Commercial/Industrial $.04/sq.ft. of property x SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DI'TRICT Hospital Area) WATER UNITS SAD FEE DEVELOPMENTS WITH 1500'GPM IRE FLOWS OR LESS: Area Charge $0.0348N er sq.ft. x Frontage Charge $ .00 per front ft. x DEVELOPMENTS WITH GREA R AN 1500 GPM FIRE FLOWS: Area Charge $0. 48 per sq.ft. x Frontage Char, -- ®a $18.00 er front ft. x — SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DIS RICT (H�ney Crk. Intercptr) - SEWER UNITS SAD FEE AREA CHARGES: Residential dwelling its, apartments or equivalents; 2 0 per dwelling unit x Commercial develop nt: . $.05 per sq.ft. o' tss site area x FRONT FOOTAGE CHARGES. $37.19 per Fro t Ft. (ion ea. side) x $74.38 per f .ft. (prptt on both sides of imprv.) x --0 tWt. rj 4 ,eAt4 1444114-44) d,.a. !q o . TOTAL: $ OHO. °= The above quoted fees do NOT include inspection fees, side sewer permits,lifro-s.44, * r/w permit fees or the cost of water meters. ait...t. . \ fr l .)--I" 90 �;,� DATE / ®4,-.) Signature of Director or Authoriz• 'epresentative RE.L ._ .,.; COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT L_--_.TMENT �� c�`II 4, ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET �` t 9A990 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: �� 4'b DATE CIRCULATED: JANUARY 25, 1990 COMMENTS DUE: FEBRUARY 8 , 1990 EFC - 006 - 90 APPLICATION NO(S) : . SA-006-90 PROPONENT: Dennis Riebe PROJECT TITLE: Sunset Gardens BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval for 60 unit multi-family residential complex on vacant site zoned for R-3 use. LOCATION: 909-915 Aberdeen Avenue N.E. SITE AREA 2. 6 acres BUILDING AREA (gross) : . 91 acre (approx. ) IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth ° o ° ° • 2 . Air . ' ° 3 . Water V 0 o ° ° 4 . Plants ° ° ° 5. Animals ° ° ° 6. Energy & Natural Resources ° ° 7 . Environmental Health ° o ° ° 8 . Land & Shoreline Use ° ° 9. Housing ° ° 10. Aesthetics ° ° ° 11. Light & Glare ° ° ° 12 . Recreation ° ° 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ° ° ° 14 . Transportation ° ° 15. Public Services J` ° ° ° V / 0 ° 16. Utilities 0 ° COMMENTS: DCa w,►ti.c j-S on Moo i ",CD f i We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. fri'); D4C/1/#64Ateeir el. Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date 0) (i-- Rev. 6/88 N 1T ...2c. . jRENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT" DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF- 006-90 APPLICATION NO(S) . : SA-006-90 PROPONENT: Riebe & Associates PROJECT TITLE: Sunset Gardens BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF. PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval for 60 unit multi-family residential complex on vacant site zoned for R-3 use. LOCATION: 909-915 Ab4rdeen Avenue N.E. TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION • PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE • PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON FEBRUARY 8 , 1990. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: St Dan Lade,' APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS X NOT APPROVED r 40 be o bk/ (corn Port / Vw4.e> /n 1 e r dd.r }o d arc L F S*von r v n o� across I f%' /417P er4 7, — 8 AFF id D;( VA S�4vc+o ^ s�tall vfFbe s kfn s 1a1 q/(��� Cc ' oP ��n f e dar� 'vst prio✓ II be A 2.5ye4. d 7, K 7A e f`° / -tr;i fevy, 5 — 7G �o_e) vv(an.t 3101? b-e s-to,ily y, r despi r f-*Se • h & s , - SGS din oP or a � n � IRrIr rroveli 1 rj° md. C w� I be '1'eir rosibn Sed i✓h�'►14ro'� eh AA �� ref us etit(0 �h a� �q4G �rofq r y E �e s�br►�+i � �f 114 m r ,, trkicieW,14 pi. DATE .2/15/10 SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 6/88 • N • - a �19fyj RENTUN'' COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DE1� TMENT C cFR�'Tioiv "f ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET /990 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: SeWc- �I 1ie[ ��, , DATE CIRCULATED: JANUARY 25,E 1990 COMMENTS DUE: FEBRUARY 8 , 1990 EFC - 006 - 90 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-006-90 PROPONENT Dennis Riebe PROJECT TITLE: Sunset Gardens BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval for 60 unit multi-family residential complex on vacant site zoned for R-3 use. LOCATION: 909-915 Aberdeen Avenue N.E . SITE AREA 2 . 6 acres BUILDING AREA (gross) : . 91 acre (approx. ) IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth v ' ° ° 2 . Air , ° ° 3 . Water ✓ ° 4 . Plants 0 ° O ° ° 1 5. Animals ° 6. Energy & Natural Resources 0 • 0 ° ° 7 . Environmental Health ti ° O ° ° 8 . Land & Shoreline Use ° O O _° 9 . Housing ° c. ° ° ° 10 . Aesthetics ,, ° 11. Light & Glare 12 . Recreation ° ° ° ° 13 . Historic- & Cultural Preservation , ° ° ° ° 14 . Transportation ° o ° ° 15. Public Services ° ° ° o / ° ° 16. Utilities ° COMMENTS: , 1 We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal., ,A4-194- /,.,n., / �.. /99v . Signatu of Director c horized Representative bate , Rev. 6/88 _,. } n , RENTGA-"COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEP___L2MENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF- 006-90 APPLICATION NO (S) . : SA-006-90 PROPONENT: Riebe & Associates PROJECT TITLE: Sunset Gardens -BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval for 60 unit multi-family residential complex on vacant site zoned for R-3 use. r LOCATION: 909-915 Al*rdeen Avenue N.E . TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT . SCHEDULED ERC DATE: ENGINEERING DIVISION a TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS . REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON FEBRUARY 8, 1990. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: L166 ' APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONST APPROVED , ,i2pc,i D/r/ p/fry- x3 J � ti DATE S 7.c?1,/9 9� SIGN TURE OF DIRECTO OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 6/88 .l- bb V. 4 REN`1: . :f COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DE._=_'RTMENT /4-1( ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET. :4:9 �, 04REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: �,i��6 k 4990 DATE CIRCULATED: JANUARY 25, 1990 COMMENTS DIE- F-E-B 2,UARY 8, 19 45)10 4 40, EFC - 006 - 90 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-006-90 rJAN 2 5 1990 PROPONENT: Dennis Riebe PROJECT TITLE: Sunset Gardens BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approva f 60 unit multi-family residential complex on vacant site zoned for R-3 use. LOCATION: 909-915 Aberdeen Avenue N.E. SITE AREA 2 . 6 acres BUILDING -AREA (gross) : . 91 acre (approx. ) IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE j MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION 1 IMPACT ' IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth ° o ° o 2 . Air ° o ° ° 3 . Water / V ° 4 . Plants ° 5. Animals ° o 6 . Energy & Natural Resources ° 7 . Environmental Health ° 8 . Land & Shoreline Use 5 9 . Housing V v V n 10. Aesthetics ° ° O 11. Light &. Glare ° o ° o 12 . Recreation • ° 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ° 14 . Transportation 2 ° 15. Public Services ° ° 16 . Utilities ° COMMENTS: J \ We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which ,we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where add' ional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. V / r Signatur o Director or Authorized Representative Date , Rev. 6/88 RENTL, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DE1--TMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF- 006-90 APPLICATION NO(S) . : SA-006-90 PROPONENT: Riebe & Associates PROJECT TITLE: Sunset Gardens . BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval for 60 unit multi-family residential complex on vacant site zoned for R-3 use. LOCATION: 909-915 .AY ?rdeen Avenue N.E . TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE:` ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION ) SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE 'DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE PARKS AND1RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON FEBRUARY 8, 1990. i I REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: ijL ,;,(e.i APPROVED >'APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED -r? 2Z-06 r eGle t.„ DATE —1 c3 SIGNATURE OF /RECTOR OR AUTHORI D REPRESENTATIVE REV. 6/88 . v RENT-_: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DE_,_-;TMENT ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Dkansportton services Division 1 DATE CIRCULATED: JANUARY 25, 1990 COMMENTS DUE: F C EFC - 006 - 90 P EKGar/oF el APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-006-90 4 � ,igo PROPONENT: Dennis Riebe �E� ,7AN 2 6 1990 PROJECT TITLE: Sunset Gardens BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval for 60 unit multi-family residential complex on vacant site zoned for R-3 use. LOCATION: 909-915 Aberdeen Avenue N.E . SITE AREA 2 . 6 acres BUILDING AREA (gross) : . 91 acre (approx. ) IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth ° ° 2 . Air ° ° 3 . Water ° o ° ° 4 . Plants . ° o ° ° 5. Animals ° o ° ° 6. Energy & Natural Resources ° o ° ° 7 . Environmental Health ° ° ° 8 . Land & Shoreline Use ° ° o ° ° 9 . Housing ° ° ° 10. Aesthetics ° ° 11. Light & Glare ° ° 12 . Recreation ° o ° ° 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ° ° ° ° 14 . Transportation ° ° O ° 15. Public Services ° o O ° 16. Utilities ° COMMENTS: Off-site improvements plans required for street improvements * Curb, gutters and sidewalk * Street lighting to City standards * Widening of Northbound lane on Aberdeen to allow thru Northbound traffic passage around left-turning vehicles to driveway. We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional iciformation is needed to properly assess this proposal. k:q. -`/7 .1 lep, • Signature of Director or thorized Re res tative Dat,� 7/ Si g �� P CA Rev. 6/88 • D Transportation Services Division RENT 'COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEP 'MENT [g ir E ou DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF- 006-90 APPLICATION NO (S) . : SA-006-90 'JAN 2 6 1990 PROPONENT: Riebe & Associates PROJECT TITLE: Sunset Gardens BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval for 60 unit multi-family residential complex on vacant site zoned for R-3 use. LOCATION: 909-915 Ab, rdeen Avenue N.E . TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON FEBRUARY 8, 1990. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: /�/�jS/s �/�j�}77 J s' APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED Off-site improvement plans required for street improvements * Curb, gutters and sidewalk * Street Lighting to City standards * Widening. of Northbound lane on Aberdeento allow thru Northbound passage around left turning vehicles to driveway. >7 DATE v 7`}/� SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR THORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV., 6/88 RENr,�. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DL�_:RTMENT P +NAVG ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET CYO, NN REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: per. elPtaimukoi JAN 2 91990 DATE CIRCULATED: JANUARY 25, 1990 COMMENTS D E: FEkb '; •j ,,y® 990 1 EFC - 006 - 90 PL4NNING DIVISION APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-006-90 CITY OFRENTON PROPONENT: Dennis Riebe JAW 2 5 1990 PROJECT TITLE: Sunset Gardens A ECEIVEt BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT,:_ Applicant seeks site plan approval for 60 unit multi-family residential complex on vacant site zoned for R-3 use. LOCATION: 909-915 Aberdeen Avenue N.E. . N -. SITE AREA 2 . 6 acres BUILDING 'AREA (gross) :. . 91 acre (approx. ) IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth . ° o ° O 2 . , Air ° - o ° ° 3 . Waterer - ° ° ° 4 . Plants ° o ° 0 5. Animals ° o ° ° 6. Energy & Natural Resources 0 ° ° ° 7 . Environmental Health, k. o ° ° 8 . Land & Shoreline Use ° o O ° 9. Housing ° o 0 0 10. Aesthetics 0 ° o - 0 ° 11. Light & Glare- ° o ° ° 12 . Recreation A' ° ° ° ° 13 . ' Historic & Cultural Preservation ° ° ° 14 . Transportation 0 ° o ° ° 15. Public Services ° 0 O 0 16. Utilities t ° 0 00MMENTS: EIJVIR0"d'44 'ftL WMILtA erftemS or (.,obo/. Perwt, 04100. Vour4t+E' TRANsoum,140.> Clio s ► evbs ro tle 'tVUL�+4�D '�D �fi- O LC1�1 tZt�LS� 544C1)Up l3E LesP Gw 4 VTvte 742SCD&r,tTS. bJT?3R$wn3� v// 6z.t 04> 6b4,001.p Be 6VAW4r.r ` r~t L Chftewri co• "44:7 ta1100U, As vorVary of �t3�-ttak,� ANvs.�+pus w / hW on i-+4ri1 i� We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. i iz.76.0 Signature o Director or Authorized Representative Dat Rev. 6/88 w RENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DE:. _ .TMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET NNING DIVISION CFfl'OF RENTON ECF- 006-90 APPLICATION NO(S) . : SA-006-90 JAN 2 5 1990 ' ' PROPONENT: Riebe & Associates RECEIVE*PROJECT TITLE: Sunset Gardens . BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval for 60 unit multi-family residential complex on vacant site zoned for R-3 use. LOCATION: 909-915 Abser•deen. Avenue 'N.E . TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: ,ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU , POLICE DEPARTMENT , COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ` BUILDING DIVISION G, . PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE U4 LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: 4 ' COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: d0 P.M. ON FEBRUARY 8, 1990. , REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION:II APPROVED. APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED eR J --besl‘„,+( m-F-T'1t@ ISi-6064, • 1 S S•rtrotb t,. IL S 1't' ? l l�t)W1 i 'b $I(.4 1M " G j' 1 " "L c''c 8V lest 4x6411"4"j 41F '111V ,_ I F/tor� Si0 Eviva. avegute, Sal v4 is A �ROBI.rf`4..: 'tnc� 1'�. ^`e- Lhurrs Too VIfitZ e 6 .1 "(Acuff' L►i.lp „yam ". I S 11"S pK �/ Fi¢2'l --w-g•? 5 S �., Ir'lli4 d _ �'CE �P -/kCI�.SA. c' bR -1110442., 60,1D5caPlot> lei S,4,c,L.p Q_,Pw eAt.I A TI. -Tkt? A,ls,u.g,.;2.. cep 1 41to--�--' DATE V Z 9 q� SIGNATURE OF DIRE l TOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 6/88 . r b\ , RENT_ _4 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DL_-RTMENT 124 N� �/0m ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET �oFR�a N REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: n' 6A0 11Retna==41M1 e9 0 j1900 DATE CIRCULATED: JANUARY 25, 1990 COMMENTS DUE: FEBRUARY 8 , ilyQ b EFC - 006 - 90 APPLICATION NO (S) : SA-006-90 PROPONENT: Dennis Riebe 'PROJECT TITLE: Sunset Gardens BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval for 60 unit multi-family residential complex on vacant site zoned for R-3 use. LOCATION: 909-915 Aberdeen Avenue N.E. SITE AREA 2 . 6 acres BUILDING AREA (gross) : . 91 acre (approx. ) IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth ° o ° ° 2 . Air ° o ° ° 3 . Water ° 4 . Plants ° o ° 5. Animals ° ° ° 6. Energy & Natural Resources ° o ° ° 7 . Environmental Health ° ° ° 8 . Land & Shoreline Use ° o ° 9 . Housing ° ° ° 10. Aesthetics ° o ° ° 11. Light & Glare ° 12 . Recreation ° ° 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ° ° ° ° O 14 . Transportation ° ° o ° ° 15. Public Services ° ° ° 16. Utilities ° p COMMENTS. ! � �� �� � ,„,to-m- -/f--emu v�7`'��`0 e1- �G6 �.,,J�-...4. 1 --�C 6,---- _.e..—,C. .-4 au.-G-r( .6.,.._ .e.d„f7t�r'.k ,. ,a-u�—, -ti. �a/,-.-1" . w- _ We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal,. r, ' , •V tet- r -- . 1 *--- — l() "Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date Rev. 6/88 RENT,,,- COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEi._ `:TMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF- 006-90 APPLICATION NO(S) . : SA-006-90 PROPONENT: Riebe & Associates PROJECT TITLE: Sunset Gardens BRIEF. DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval for 60 unit multi-family residential complex cmvacant site zoned for R-3 use. LOCATION: 909-915 .A1;.erdeen Avenue N.E. TO: - PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION ' PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE , LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON FEBRUARY 8, 1990. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED DATE SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 6/88 P RE. IN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT L� 'ARTMENT c�}'N�No ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET 6,99 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Wc.. J eyV V1 ``�‘,A4 0 DATE CIRCULATED: JANUARY 25, 1990 COMMENTS DUE: FEBRUARY 8 44p EFC - 006 - 90 RENTON FIRE DEPT. APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-006-90 FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU PROPONENT: Dennis Riebe jA.; L 3 '1990 PROJECT TITLE: Sunset Gardens RECEIVED BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval for 60 unit. multi-family residential complex on vacant site zoned for R-3 use. LOCATION: 909-915 Aberdeen Avenue N.E. SITE AREA 2 . 6 acres BUILDING AREA (gross) : . 91 acre (approx. ) IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth ° 2 . Air ° 3 . Water ° 4 . Plants ° 5 . Animals ° 6. Energy & Natural Resources ° 7 . Environmental Health ° 8 . Land & Shoreline Use ° 9 . Housing ° 10. Aesthetics ° 11. Light & Glare ° 12 . Recreation ° 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ° ° 14 . Transportation ° 15. Public Services ✓/ ° 16. Utilities ° COMMENTS: We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal . .t S 2 /9 Signature of Director or Authorized Representative to Rev. 6/88 * ei f REE _-q COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DLL ARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF- 006-90 APPLICATION NO(S) . : SA-006-90 PROPONENT: Riebe & Associates PROJECT TITLE: Sunset Gardens ,BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval for. 60 unit multi-family residential complex on vacant site zoned for R-3 use. LOCATION: 909-915 Aberdeen Avenue N.E . TO: - PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT \ SCHEDULED ERC DATE: ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: ' r UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN r WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. \ON FEBRUARY 8, 1990. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: , fire_ ece,L ex°)k-1.6Y\ APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED Any development and/or construction shall comply with current Fire and Building Codes and Ordi- nances. A second means of approved access is required. Fire D rtment access roads/lanes shall be paved minimum width 0'; minimum height 13' 6". Yes__ No Preliminary fire flow calculations show a fire flow of is required. hydrants with a minimum flow of / c1/42-0 gpm each , is required. Primary hydrant is required to be within LSD "feet of the structure. Secondary hydrants are required to be within __ feet of the structure. An approved-automatic sprinkler system is required_to protect the total structure. Yes No_. All fire department access roads are to be paved and installed prior to construction. Yes �!No All fire hydrants are required to be installed and approved prior to construction. Yes 'No DATE S /? 7 SIGN TURE OF DIRECTOR 'OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE • REV. 6/88 4 • RCQU f RCI) FIRE FLOW CALCULATIONS 1. HAZARD IDENTIFICATION INFORMATION NAME /(4S F7- 4,426'b gA S • U.B.C. CLASS OF BUILD ADDRESS 9(1 5*- `VS /98e-eZ7 A) h2dg. N.E.. FIRE MGMT AREA 2. DETERMINE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION - CLASS (CIRCLE ONE): I - II IV III VD FIRE-RESISTIVE NON-COMBUSTIBLE • ORDINARY W F MIXED (NOTE: IF "MIXED", SEE SPECIAL INSTRUCTION FOR AREA AND BASIC FIRE FLOW) ` 3. DETERMINE AREA; .7�,� GROUND FLOOR AREA: FT2 (A) /,f• • NUMBER OF STORIES: • • TOTAL BUILDING AREA: /a? ,, 6-AA 4. DETERMINE BASIC -FIRE FLOW FROM TABLE Ai, USING AREA (A): . . O do GPM CB) 5. DETERMINE OCCUPANCY FACTOR ADJUSTMENT: ADJUSTMENT: — 7s6 GPM CC) IF LOW HAZARD, SUBTRACT UP TO 25% OF (B) IF HIGH HAZARD, ADD UP TO 25% OF (B) 6. COMPUTE SUB-TOTAL (B+C): CIF 8+C IS LESS THAN 500 GPM, INSERT 500 GPM) 2,Z -O GPM (D) 7. DETERMINE SPRINKLER ADJUSTMENT: ADJUSTMENT: / 1 Z. 6- • GPM (E) CIF COMPLETELY SPRINKLERED, SUBTRACT UP TO 50% OF CD): IF LIGHT HAZARD OCCUPANCY AND FIRE RESISTIVE OR NON-COMBUSTIBLE CONSTRUCTION, SUBTRACT UP TO 75% OF CD). 8. DETERMINE EXPOSURE ADJUSTMENT': USING THE TABLE AT LEFT AS A GUIDE, ENTER THE SEPARATION AND ADJUSTMENt FOR EACH OF THE "FOUR FACES" OF THE BUILDING IN THE TABLE AT THE RIGHT: SEPARATION MAC. ADJUSTMENT EXPOSURE SEPARATION ACT. ADJ. 0 - 10 25% MAX. NORTH 1 ' ADD /O % 11 - 30 ' 20% MAX. EAST //O' ADD O % • 31 - 60 15% MAX. SOUTH /Z ' ADD 2 O % 61 -100 10% MAX. WEST /O S' ADD d S % 101 -150 5% MAX. TOTAL % OF ADJUSTMENT 150 OR 4-HR WALL 0% MAX. (NOTA/O % TO EXCEED 75%) : (TOTAL % ADJUSTMENT TIMES CD) ADJUSTMENT: + 9c GPM (F) 9. DETERMINE ROOF AND SIDING COVERING ADJUSTMENT: • ' CIF SHINGLE COVERING, ADD 500 GPM) ADJUSTMENT: GPM CG) 10. COMPUTE ESTIMATED FIRE FLOW REQUIRED: (IF D+E+F+G IS LESS THAN 500 GPM, INSERT 500 GPM) CIF D+E+F+G IS GREATER THAN 12,000 GPM, INSERT 12,403 GPM) (:Z• 7 CD+E+F+G) REQUIRED FIRE FLOW: . O UCH GPM (H) 11. SIGNED: d rATE 1' r2-x,C- . 0 5 /R PO • CITY OF RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 200 Mill Avenue South -Renton, Washington 98055 Yen Fun, Tung 9850 California Ave . SW Seattle , WA 98163 RETURN Ta SENDER NO FORWARD ORDER UN "ILE i T `Th V E RA BI E -----,, :> >:u'1RESSED I `' jI C66I t"' r+� (kv u'Ja5'_c rD fURW^�,,� —'' R `7 IWg 11 .7 RETUiiN TO WRITER J NOTICE OF PENDING SITE PLAN APPROVAL , RENTON,WASHINGTON A Site Plan Application has been filed- and accepted with the Current Planning Division •of the Community Development Department. The following briefly describes the application and the necessary Public Approvals. DESCRIPTION: Sunset Gardens SA-006-90 ` • Applicant seeks site plan approval for 60 unit multi-family residential complex on vacantsite zoned for R=3 use. GENERAL LOCATION: 909-915 Aberdeen Avenue N.E. • - PUBLIC APPROVALS: , o Environmental Review - o Site Plan Approval o Building Permit The application can be reviewed in the Current Planning Division located on the third floor of Renton City Hall. Comments will be accepted anytime prior to Public . Hearings, during Public Hearings, or prior to an administrative site plan approval. For further information on the application or dates of final action by the City, please contact the Community Development Department, Current Planning Division at • 235-2550. ti r 1 rssldanoeT.1.97 u • -vacant land 1? ' vacant land �� I ,17 s Is/ ¢7,..r7 - -- _� -IT I.I. l "'S.4,7 r-6 1 10 2 13 --Li i' 1 I o a / 0.3 3 Ac.B --Li ---� - r` � � land �'p•35Ac0 • rssldanoa _ r 644 63 - / __ rssidanosC11 --- 12-'- --- -- -. �--L/4 9 I -/'.,i< eiir, . •psir9t1-riPir ma 1�: rssidsnos - A/7 79 I-3 ,., V�•-1'L . i�r, v 411 Ills°F �L 4- WO' 1 �_ - -- ---- - ----��- -- �11 / apartment •;' CII vsoant-(and vsoant land ' •Sg 6 a 7 .. _ 59,E ?? I , f . •' ! ?6A7a •`2.' 63.36 // 1 // iy ` 11��9907/ / ; 60 I99�r�1 _\\ ../ / /../�f f r .7-1.7r1 ,i Q'• a / /./ / -AD- re alit tl r� 4 0.. Cl n 11'1 %// / / 1 2i L� / re M UN I ra s MJDno J .. / / �E // / , ,� Z34 G7 4 • ,� ,.s � ` risldsnas e0 , . s )3 Cn apartments j._� - - - -=H b. 0 8 0l 9a5 0.9,9 AC. Z ' 1 Z 1 40s i� r1aaldan•, f rasidano t th Z I - one 1-; . 902I ®4r.i Z j; spartmsn r ._ _ - .f, ' wcant land -�aldanos r ' '/61-illislq),T: ::: mil.4 ,,,vsoant Ian 6 : \ y `s D� _ A i7,y �,r /r7' 13 s 'i rssidanoa I '`-=-`t• �t.-C 1 ' r'y "' _ • l 1 5 . ' -. A. _. h �6'7 A . 1 D 1` ` � I8151 �� 12 L.r R,g : rdo Y,i� Z .7/9 4! r^ �'� 7 C^ t ,f' 24 1 9V rssldsncs 21 ' r 0 1,. ca ,; /•) ono 1 ti 4 • cant land . ' 8 W •'''I•, , 760. 79. ^3220 39 • 10 •3 lob='2 'd Ll '4-asldanoa pis ` - Q IAA // _ --- - 9 z� y -{ residence rasldsno ai- — _ d ` Yacsnt land v 71 I- r O . r. : l � `ssldsnol,l` L• cantlan �761 75 I• •, w • D '.'1 AIAL ss I �a di - a� • �'a lUI., ? r�--=� ter' 5 I " _ I11 ,R ,..... . . . ... • --. . . < _ _ _- _ . _ _ri- cil.-f-',' - I Wo.s h i ro?ton .-I ' '--: " ' it.- ' . "."-' 7.- ik:..-!'l , • .....--,•e.---cr.. I . 7,-It.,:r • T aii i . ..1, 4 it. 1 IP. ,• 1 jk, :•\'-'; t" . . ....,?..11.1—..,................crci,...• •}...0.4-9.494, •-_0,..,.S -: ;;i- ‘ . .I...• 4.... 1. .. 7 rA:.-----1?---'::-; ..z1 -;,,,..:.-1 .,:. i., ,,'ri.: .: . -,-„:1. 1-I p.-„,...,..v.ii‘ .,.4 • • ;11 ',.I.•\Ill . 1;.-.r"-q. 1 . .17:\ 41. 7 h.. ii Z..s.,Jirif.-.•Vri,.,..--.7..,-V. ;rt.,...t.,IS_L•..A . .9 I.- I . . .3 . . . . I .. • ,_r. (L. ik ,,LJ O. ,< • • _ . . • . • ........re AG...MP,.G4 .2.'t.I.--1.....=.14.• , •\Tgr;lit;17:-•':',.;4‘- ;;kill ; 17' -454 \ '-1. .. 1.-vti, ir -r % 1 (1`_ . Li..- ; • . _ „`,_.--,,L.•,-,. •PI A YlIVr-:I. Y . 7.1...g '-'. --. I..-- : .... ' '/ )-- %-'i r- f. _....3.L,-- . •L 3. r' -Z.1- •IPlil "litti. • (• . . 1.7'- 1—',,L)..,4,-..1 '• %. ;- • re-r" ;.••:6Rrs ,• . . ..,,O.' . 4 4 :i' Y • • . •• E 3Y; • ...L ,f A, ‘,...9 . .. • . , 4 • :- --..../ . ,- . .,\.._.1 r,...s \ _____ -„i ., -,, -and 6,IY St 6.'0.'4 , - . _ I • •. \ -.'.., -• ..---,--- I c——,—---. —,— ,—————__ '''-' ___ _ -L.1 • 1 ‘_•__) ,,,Z?II \ • ———_•__ ——_—__„, .....,,, ......... I.. .>.-.S"'f•-•'"--'' '- • . . r------- \ © , -1-.-"'-wrir.,....--; -, • itZ- . E-'i '4'; .. • .0 I / -c4 z 4-, • . - INT...11,3C-Icr.........• , 6.., `...\ . C/)•, `.1 6,,, I . -.. ..:00000011111.1 ,-- . -\ i.• \\\ -- , . . , Welk 1 • ' i I •D ?- ..- . - . 0 .- 111 \r-------- _..--- _ \ ;lc / ,r'"----- H.. : '. .1 -I— 1 ,T .T..ic_T_I.T . ..,. . . .' , . • - 1 1 . I - ' • ‘3 • - _ in 7-...• ' 2/1 2/1 ',. 2/2 •' ; 1-.frr-:1 : s 0 • ! , .._ -2\0?: - • \ 1 t----- • .. ... .. .r....., . • . i .,. • in.,' t • 2/1 \--------- .. I I --1.--- ',."I,/,.-..rr .4 • sr." 0 1] : 1 8 ! '1 .--\'4'• '1 'i•••• i . 3/2 r • •. 1-• t. \ I' .------ /. Il 1,11 _. • .1_6 1 . , 2/2 i e : \----- - , , T'...r •-c6T . ' 1 6 I ' . ... _ 1 1 . , 11 ., ;:— .„,.., _ • . -.i , 1 ...a..c,....c ,,...a . . • ___-,•--,..-,_ 2/2 • 6 a _ . , • . . i \ ,i ,.,.. • - 1"- \ • -p., .. •-- - .._21 - ) ' r. ' CV . RTir---D72R......,-,...r..1F....c.f.. ..6.^•R.5, . -- ..‘ PROJECT STATISTICS • I . r . ..........-- N :.1.,,T,E.,4.”,..• ......._4 ACIL.g113.21S...TA .9 I• III ... .. :1 ;' _ • *1..3:1;:TrieL '"; * ; 1 r • A61191.\1•/... :::::::I::;:;:. ' . SOMA/VA. 911 S.F.31 MUT.. 0 E.< 110039.\I SA. o4.s.r.11_10LW 10 41 TOTAL lo OVITS •011.0.1140•CONrof/T10R. IDILDIND A SOAR.\I,SA. . A • • /Otto"...I ,•1313.3..\1.AA. • c_. - 0•0•0'LOOM ARTA. /...9.3•• RO•X.\I Ilk. PROJECT TEAM BOAC.\I AA. • SCIL01.130 C SOAR.\A AA. ,7•3.1 _.. . 00am FLooa ARTA.11,21 sr .10...\I S.A. ;1 r • •DS.K.3,2 AA. N 0..19/AFFLICANT: AVM.,OAADEN......D 1011-01M0 0 ODAXAT SA. ORO.FLOOR KARA; ITO.sr ADA.41.\3 10.. 41-...,-.:.I...20 1•113.003.1.1.3.1.10.401•091 cAo••FLOOR ARCA.11,139.sr •0•44.\I SA. 7-- 4 . .- . 004) 11)-4411. • - ICII.DIRc I AO..\I SA. GAO"FLOOR ARTA. 4,9 4 a•• •DIul.\I SA. T. . 1011 TTTTT AVLICIT M.L. ArODIREO. 411 at•IOncr TALL. r sUITL leo __ys GOE•T STA LA • DLI.1.3311,sAIIRINOTON IDS TOTA.C..sTs.I.• .. . 13011 .111-3,33 1.4.0•10zot III 01•134DARD TALL,113).30 14 STANDARD o.l.L.. ,covcAsoI • . • LAMOIICArc ARCIVITIC, OLSIGII 340 Um,. II COMPACT•ALL•409[341 I. • LEGAL DESCRIPTION /SO 1.1.1111 MT....• ._.,moon., 'ALLA(OF.) ..A•1433..33.0.4 to/TOTAL"A L• /. 11011 10,333 - F—: I i• - lllllll 00.9 RALA. /CILDIMO•/ 1.423.1 4 AND le,NAILAILIF CARDER 1.0.33 TRIC-r• ."...........r .............. '..• ; IKAFT,M,0...... /4,1119.s.. i ._As ATC0•090 Tr vOLI....•14 Of MATS.”ct 14.. !!!!..!!!..vn.....• , • NOTICE OF PENDING SITE PLAN APPROVAL RENTON,WASHINGTON A Site Plan Application has been filed and accepted with the Current Planning Division of the Community Development Department. The following briefly describes the application and the necessary Public Approvals. DES_CR IPTION: Sunset Gardens SA-006-90 • Applicant seeks site plan approval for 60 unit multi-family residential complex on vacant site zoned for R-3 use. GENERAL LOCATION: 909-915 Aberdeen Avenue N.E. PUBLIC APPROVALS: o Environmental Review o Site Plan Approval o Building Permit • The application can be reviewed in the Current Planning Division located on the third floor of Renton City Hall. Comments will be accepted anytime prior to Public . Hearings, during Public Hearings, or prior to an administrative site plan approval. For further information on the application or dates of final action by the City, please contact the Community Development Department, Current Planning. Division at 235-2550. �_J �. 14 E; ��46 e J ( resldenoeT[.57 -C 6 / I . 7c.1.4.� r vacant lend vacant land 671 .!7 TI./2Q / / i2)s � Isr Q ' I�OD 0.3 3 AG.8 0 13 LJ ---"' f r land 0,35Ac residence -_ j � 160 /&fi I' 6a� 6J � Vrc. ;.. I 96 L9.e3 o ELL.J, 9 / N residence _ /� ' -; -- ------- ----- 12---- -------,,,,...--A -1�.�� a»�4 ---- �f'I ape 9tIiNt 4 N h + 1 •_, residence - "c/7 7Cll ., • y 7,.'. n 1 1—� 1 • �.�� 240.0. '3 • c- • - -- - ---•- ---- - -- �11 1 1� apartment ; ;: _ • 1 `-3 NAYa 4 Di 16 a. 7 vacnt land vaosnt land _ � J,. 4— • 1 26 /8\ss\ m / :/ . k G 60 Lj 1 .ty,QdTnoe c, ' 6 - // //:///71° ... % ......cor/ ///y/ r, , (:).I T ree naW Crs // / 76 T:/i1: ut / I /// ) •` /r 2J6 L7 • 5� . Hs .15 ` , tb resldenois rrl apartments p r- -( - =H - L.L. -' • l9015 O.9Q AC. Z '.t Z qos -72 rr,esidsn [ resident: Cn Z. -�c I , 3021 I 4 . co _ - I y,Z� r.t 7 s • If ■partmsn __ r 7, e2 r .- - -- - vacant land esidsnoe 7 la rn r r soy' ! • Sr�� Y — r;L.Cy l .6c vacant Ian c �o rn -. 6 ,;/ • ti �.. S l• no • . !Til sD c ` 37,9 Jr1 / 7fN 13 • �r�'i_ , -K D3 realdenos �/ '> D rJ (825� l�' 29 C • 12 �y[~ a,g -6-7 0• �4r--- J Icica r„iY{_ 7/9 4I 1 5, s �i` z � � '� =Y; 24 : v,rialden 21 , c� 4^/ (., 1 0 :y. o , • cant land �, . ., r : g •:� °I., `r 260. 79. '' f2'n ,3? 10 11,. j ..) Iol_:2 ,'9 4 Z r-• ;�-esidence J1 Q I� --1/4 residence ; - residano a+-1 Q-1 r_ Vacant land 7i <, i sl - :. O • ^ - -- -2---- I Ir o 2 Z o -7c ., cant Ian?! __ lr� }�esidenol*� /6Q �s �,r� 1• .. q V E • D bualnsaw r I I rya d�ra- a�� 1 _ Z• -. 1r.f rn rrr �' I ��C1�� 4a, ? 1T,Cj,:i r,,r s 1 I •• I,, 1.c . cam. •-- . • __ -___ - __ _ _ . . _ .---__-- . __ ___ i Ir.5 h i n'r r o tr . :1 . Y'--3"- :-..-.-1:NJ If--..t.--•r'q't'.... ..r.1' 1.1 .-- .s, ,"' :5 ,e.: f ••••• it::I;.--I:.,__-_ .. ,.... . ; ; I, ,. 4 a . • ,T2. ,r.....1..r.-1,TO•SE i•Ortrorefr Tr• : - T ‘11 • • ..C. ''' I.. ...,...-..--..,...„...., --.- ._. ‘1.1 • . ......-•..-:-... . • . I t •Cr7r7....L...• r•SX.--,',''',-------..... -..q....--_ _-. \-V4I! ') • ..„-...7,--, •'•.=1‘.Z....1"' ."-.-, 7.A.CO-rare").,..E••LC•P, ...,.......r,-...a..,...,-,,, - 1 I • e.,Lci,11.111.7::-.4.,....•••••,,;•••0+;1-„, 1 ,. iiTti...L.17,..,‘..:•t ,.....a ___ rz.,.)7,•'. _ rp.:. :1 i .:7 -;-:: I -1-4... li. r,. ' P3-- • <I --....%.::•-•."7-:. -.,,-;11:6'-j's4„.7., . •1$ -.'"• 1 I., / i •1.0.4 14'''•,T ,' ..-t M - :- •,- '''s - b,.... • ' 13- l' tr:Si'li.;'•:!;'7-17';',Vc rit ... ....1 ,•,,..t i-.1.-• _. , 6t0r,---• .141-IP:- -•- •, \:•,,i,,,,,,,z• ,,v.,' -, 1, •,•,ty li.fli I , _4: '• ;I. 11 1 ; • . . • : 1 . . .. 1 : l.L . . . •.0.-nrri Ala',lb.".I 04 •`.. *SA. 1...--..PA- !I VZ.'";.i r t ti.'-..- •All..'-..-1.- ''''''\ i ' ''-2:-1 ---. I :- '. OZ 4 ..I .,.!,,l.f\_,,,h:L-4', '.Mil R Viqr.., • .. 4.1. I...0 ''...• -•• ••-•- -1 -•' II • x_.1 1•41ii- -,- .;,_::;-,.-,-----.t. - e,n151 jai. • r.-, I-_- ..-...-... 41'i•.,..1 i ! %(\-- 1 • •-•-...1‘.. -in,.r.1‘111 ., kth Liz .',.. -:.J.1.•••;•• i : )0 \\JA,__....t-1C)_,..••••'-i9C71-L.M.le it,V„L.L.:-..y7A jr-rr e-,..rrRy ix„,4-4-5 .--o 4,--e•-ger ,...4.141-•6 vc.:Nrry t-114. .........• ,' 1) • _1 ‘5, • . ,., g? 1•%; 1 4' .•;' e.•'' . g :••_' q ' i .• E 3b1 , : . :,•4 ,f 1,P , • • : e•o Z\_I ‘;.11 • . ',•'!----- •\ • . .• : ">•1 : 4 . "or"--'-----._ '.. I z lil - .. ir . _.•.7___________ -91 _ •-. -9. -N ••\ • --=,--_ 7 - - ._ III '• . -• \_\----• -.1-'1 - ,---- -----___-,--- . _ . _ 7;.-:i•• E. ....--- , I -1 • I MN kr.• • .ii-A WO MO --- tk.1/1 ' FT- ,.,, ___-- ..,___...i ,..,, I a ! - -- , 1 t C) • • • ...f,?-"'" J 11,-, -•=4z .,v..;' • ° Ilertgro ‘...-__. \----7 \ e ;••;-s-rc,,, Ili , TYR SVV...r.u...., . .r.3 • '' \I A .-1.- 2/1 1 M- , 1 -. c••• lit...irs• ---------- ..-. ' ., C/)• '''! ,S. \------ , \ e 1 I '.'•,S -; \ I lk% , Olga \OW _ \ ' a' • i T ,T,1,.T,..1,T_1,..--F, ••..........7 . . . ,,... Y 1 CC)-,•-=g:.'s' -i. v----- • 2 •' I 1%/k -I : ' 1 $ • -g i : i• c.1!,_L_Ili'. ,,i3 I.i,-;. v .,,,2,0 : • K . .._ . .. . _.._. __ .... . •i ‘1 19 \----2 1 1 , ' 1111 .• . 7 a t./...1, ,..r....,.I I . . . • 0 - • 2..g.•"/:>-...-1" ::.., 7QI •---------- i 11 W I : -- Igal 4 7ft...a I::M: •,._--...:_ 1 I . • \....___--- I. _ TPIIIIIIIe,,, • s. ,., • 0 11 I 1 -- A. 7.•+.../el..1.,r' .1 e 1 - •-\\.T- I',;'• 1 Irt2ill/2- PrA'5 \------------ •-,-..1-_,.,,. •• i © 1\--\-'- -\\• 2/2 Thr Lem-, T,t-r`.'...."..-3/M./2 •.. 6 e0 7 - 11 a\ P.; \ . 5.:-../,<D-r-,HA---,7,.%.:_--,D,,, p,;-,:,.;.•.:,,,--.•..-..-,„.,I.,..5. r--, 1 fSiIiTiE iIAiRiEA:is iiiim__T__- .i'1-si-c-i--rr1 1111.221 2,....1,,.,10, l _ w. .. • -_ cHr „ PROJECT STATISTICS ' ) • ^1 • 3 1. ''•'• t % • IT SA.X.COv142 'C'''...•"i'''.• 2 7 le..r. 4 mors ) --k rom.‘a za. •1144 s.r.12 VIII. 202.X.k2 RA. III S.r. 24 CNIT2. (// SOLC\1.1. .14 m.r.u_DX.Itz 0 :OPAL 10.Z1•• BUILD,.OG24202.10113 SOLL01110 2. 2DRR.\I sk. ..014 rLOOR 2,2,1 sr .2.24.1,1 bk. • 2:2.2./1. DIDLX.\1 DA. PROJECT TEAM • ,N.I ilj_INHI . 1.14211/2.2PLICANT:. SUNSET GARDEN L-----D 22.2,224------ • GPO.!LOOS ARTA1 10,407 Mr ICILDICG C .0.22001 -11,422 sr 201E01. 020.IL*.RALE!11.211 Sr 'll - Nn, - ki i? 12442 2.M. 421421------ ICILDINO.2 1111111 111 = _-_ 1.A.:21..11.112NOTON blobs 1.02 I 11,1.mr spbm.\1 2A. 11011 242-4444 201L0/24 r _ . 20,14.\2 21. 1 1 . GAO.FODOR ARGAI 4.242 Sr 2,0101.\2 SX. ----- 20,2 111TX ATEND2 N.G. PARSIMOs 210:21.2 .13•21.12n• TALLA . • SUIT:I. --II ODIAT rrs LAI -----YOE.sASX2M0,024 Is1 TOTAL STA LI _ 1.41 121-1421 .0.10.2 4,•TAMDARD 1lL. 10.241 14 STAMD.D rmu uovzmo) Lk2.SCAPE ARCK/TECT3 DESIGN 240 LIMIT. 12 CorIPACT 2 AL. 102E241 i . 2.LIIIN STREET 2. • LEGAL DESCRIPTION 91 EVERETT.V2.41X2NOTON lel TOTAL STA LI 41021 /42-21„ • • IMPERVIOUS AREA: 42220212001 LOTS 2.0 ID,Pll-----G.O.11011C I uscr• ...,.....". P3002 ENGIN----- INC. 1.2.0,DRIVES, moaa S. . • 42.2-----AVE2113E W.E. 4IDEvALIS2 --_--- • k 122 SECoaDED 224 VoLD141 14 OF PLR..FLG2 22. soli,200 • • arm..............--. OF R4, O TI CE 9,o ro• o99rFo SEPZ E�'9�P OF PENDING SITE PLAN APPLICATION DESCRIPTION • Sunset Gardens . • SA-006-90 • Applicant seeks site plan approval for 60 unit multi-family residential complex on vacant site zoned for R-3 use. GENERAL LOCATION AND/OR ADDRESS: 909-915 Aberdeen Avenue N.E. PUBLIC APPROVALS REQUIRED : SITE PLAN APPROVAL ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW BUILDING PERMIT PUBLIC COMMENTS WILL BE RECEIVED BY THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT ANYTIME PRIOR TO PUBLIC HEARINGS AND DURING PUBLIC HEARINGS. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CALL THE CITY OF RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT 235-2550 THIS NOTICE NOT TO BE REMOVED WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION CERTIFICATION I , Moott6 Sc+ ie�a. , HEREBY CERTIFY THAT 3 COPIES OF • TH.E ABOVE DOCUMENT WERE POSTED BY ME IN 3 CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON OR NEARBY THE DESCRIBED PROPERTY ON 1-3 - 1O • ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a Notary Public, in and for the State of Washington • residin in REUTa� , on the3/4.44 SIGNED : 2"J , day of ______c� of• R� v Ci e - 1.11 E 09grSD SEp-cOs" OF PENDING . SITE FLAN:APPLICATION ! DES CR I PTI ON • Sunset Gardens • SA-006-90 L / Applicant seeks site plan approval for 60 unit multi-family residential complex on vacant site zoned for R-3 use. GENERAL LOCATION AND/OR ADDRESS: 909-915 Aberdeen Avenue N.E .• PUBLIC APPROVALS REQUIRED : SITE PLAN APPROVAL ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW BUILDING PERMIT PUBLIC COMMENTS WILL BE RECEIVED BY THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT ,ANYTIME PRIOR TO PUBLIC HEARINGS AND DURING PUBLIC HEARINGS. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CALL THE CITY OF RENTON" BUILDING & ZONINGDEPARTMENT 235-2550 THIS NOTICE NOT TO BE ' REMOVED WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION J CITY OF RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor Planning Division December '19, 1989 E. Dennis Riebe 3025 112th Avenue N.E. Suite #100 Bellevue, Washington 98004 RE: Sunset Gardens, 909/951 Aberdeen Avenue Dear Mr. Riebe: Staff have now completed a preliminary review of the above- referenced project application materials. In order to begin environmental and site plan review for this proposed residential development, we will require the following materials: 1. A revised soils report which evaluates the suitability of the site to support the planned 62. unit residential complex, parking areas and recreational amenities. (Note: The existing report, dated August 25, 1988, was submitted only for review in conjunction with the reclassification action then under consideration [R 104-88] . In fact, that report states that a supplemental review would be required for "final plans once they are completed, to provide any additional or alternate recommendations that may be necessary. ") 2 . An amended Environmental Checklist which: a) identifies the presence of power transmission lines adjacent to the site; b) provides information concerning existing and anticipated transmission rates from those lines; and c) ensures that all structures to be developed on the site are sufficiently away from the power lines so that impacts to those structures do not exceed 100 milligaus. This requirement was mandated for the site in conjunction with development at the time of reclassification action -- see Hearing Examiner Report of June 22, 1989 concerning R-104- 88. (Note: If the proposed site plan must be revised to achieve this objective, then revisions should be made at this time as well) . 3 . A new traffic analysis, which provides: a) a comprehensive evaluation of the capacity of adjacent roadways to handle the 378 ADWVTE anticipated to occur with the proposed 6,2 .unitresidential complex; b) assesses the capacity of project improvements (e.g. access routes) to route traffic to and from the site; and c) recommends 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2550 r E. Dennis Riebe December 19, 1989 - Page 2 mitigation measures based upon study findings (Note: The traffic analysis provided in conjunction with the rezone application was deemed sufficient to address reclassification-related issues, but was not considered adequate to address development-related issues -- see Report of the Hearing Examiner for R 104-88, dated June 22, 1989) . 4 . A tree inventory and tree preservation plan. If you would like, you may utilize the tree inventory provided for the reclassification as a base document; the tree preservation plan can be incorporated into that base document. We will need to have twelve copies of that inventory/plan. . .(All trees must be retained until a tree plan has been approved and a vegetation management permit obtained for this site) . 5. A vicinity map or site plan which provides information on the site plan/activity orientation for abutting properties. When these materials have been submitted, we will be pleased to begin environmental and site plan review for the above-referenced project. If you have questions or need additional information, please contact me at 235-2550. Sincerely, s Lenora Blauman Project Manager . 4e,e , 1,0#0.4 .2�.me�' a, rtrn�t►.�o . Pei ,i f 1. an ��,,,�� ppn�� ' gip, , OP ,k p4'?A £ ��tiY.�9',J` . i�„ .t1 .cx ��/n 4 c nvl� tt izie-47ww~teA ceeiri eed,A„ /0,2,/friettr, I y -ea:ova Y�O/7'/ R.L t,;adeet. Jile-tp, r 177i 6-129 . 1„4 witolv& feh, Po Aeei �uvrA. 7 sO.rv�a A , �m ‘ ri; i;u�.cc o ✓ I& ei.,A — ale P.tm. ,•1 •::.:::::::::::::::::::::;.;:::.:::::::::::::::::::::::.,.;.:::.::.:::..::::..:::::::/.++dry+ �'+ �y}� /�y�� r • �:',�.+:-'< i:•ii:•i:4:v:•};:}}i} :X.;.i'r>:J}:•:4:•iiY}}:�:•::ii:t'::S:tti�}:•i:•:�+.��t�4�k:*���$���•F7���+,74•M'.N�:.�i41���� ��::::...:...........................:..:::::::::::.:•.�:::::::::::::::: //� ..... ':iiA..:1?i:{�}>:j?. ;: ��I''''•.•�:��•:;';:::{S:jyS:tiC:y}$}}:{•}}}};.i;:}$�•:ti�r+7:•}}:ti<::?<:}i�'!>.:;$S:iii•}}:•}:•}:•:;.;}}}:•: � :•i:•:•i:•ii:v:•ii:•i:•ii}};•}:•i:;{{{•};;•;:L•:LL•i:•i:<4:4ii}i::<•:::•5:•:::•:y::i:: is{4; }istiC�ii:��::'rii:•ii:i�::$;{:isi�:�i:�i:i�:�:�ii:�ii:�ii:�ii:�iiyii:�ii: Yi� RK '' = is{:iji:•?�i:.$:4i:i;(((:;{::i�:•i:i:}iif iii:•.•Y:vi:4i:::•:•:•}�}::::.'i;:ti:•:i•}:•....................5.....�T.T.......�.....��. .�....... .. ............................:....:::::::::::::...::::•.:::..................... NOTE TO APPLICANT: Since this is a comprehensive application form, only those items related to your specific type of application(s) are to be completed. Please print or type, and attach additional sheets if necessary. • APPLICANT TYPE OF APPLICATION & • FEES NAME: _ Sunset Garden Limited Partnership _*REZONE FROM( TO ) $ ' • _SPECIAL PERMIT ADDRESS: 18868 S.E. 42nd St. TEMPORARY PERMIT CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT XX SITE PLAN APPROVAL $ 852. 00 CITY: Issaquah WA. ZIP:9 8 0 27 —SPECIAL PERMIT - GRADE&FILL (NO.CU.YDS: *VARIANCE . TELEPHONE NUMBER: 6 4 3—4 6 6 9 (FROM SECTION: ROUTINE VEGETATION MANAGEMENT PERMIT CONTACT PERSON (*JUSTIFICATION REQUIRED) NAME: Riebe & Associates r.N6 SUBDIVISION: $ E. Dennis Riebe D�S ��ayj/�b' r�i�(,C S(�,� '� SHORT PLAT • ADDRESS: 3'025 �i4 Ave, N —TENTATIVE PLAT -Su-itc #194- �, PRELIMINARY PLAT — FINAL PLAT CITY: Bellevue WA. ZIP: 9 .4• —*WAIVER c 'co *(JUSTIFICATION REQUIRED) NO.OF LOTS: TELEPHONE NUMBER: 8 8 9—9 6 5 3 fl \ PLAT NAME: o O PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: $ OWNER —PRELIMINARY NAME: Same as Applicant FINAL P.U.D:NAME: ADDRESS: —BINDING SITE PLAN: $ CITY:. ZIP: MOBILE HOME PARKS: $ TELEPHONE NUMBER: TENTATIVE _PRELIMINARY LOCATION FINAL • •Iu909 & 92 Aberdeen �t"�" " •'d<<r PROPERTY ADDRESS: PARK NAME: • ti�� Ave. N.E. NO. OF SPACES: ..1 Renton, WA • EXISTING USE: Residential • s ''`�'` 't ZONING: R-3 ) ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Ufa 6N VA�,411r iI S. , �_ . PROPOSED USE: Multi-Family `"- Residential TOTAL FEES: $ 1$)ceGS•OO AREA: SQ.FT. OF PROPERTY: ' .g'ao / 4' lS 2.6±AC 113,256 Sq.Ft.+ +Dtzc.a. • 4( i0.697. CO Gam_-05(6 PL'NP"D G.Ons�ntOA�STAFF USE ONLY- -ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESSING CIrIc- . DATE RECEIV D: APPLICATION RECEIVED &DETERMINED TO BE: UEC 0 7 1989 DATE ROU7k —ACCEPTED,NOTIFICATION SENT: CJE11 �r —INCOMPLETE,NOTIFICATION SENT: BY: Master Application Form Page 2 Legal description of property (if more space is required, please attach a separate sheet). Lots 9 & 10, Harries Garden Home Tracts as recorded in volume 34 of Plats, page 38, records of King County, Washington. • AFFIDAVIT I, E. Dennis Riebe_ being duly sworn, declare that II am (please'check one) X the authorized representative to act for the property owner, the owner of the property involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS f 5 ,DAY OF ag(r.G//.1f I 19 /9 NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR THE E STATE OF WASHINGTON, RESIDING AT: _(:'iarre-of-No a_y Pa le) . (Signature of Owner) &l/&./2- 3025 112th Ave. N.E. , Suite #100 (Addy ss)' (Address) Bellevue, WA 98004 (City/State/Zip)p (City/State/Zip) OaV- p if (206) 889-9653 • (Telephone) (Telephone) Acceptance of this application and required filing fee does not constitute a complete application. Plans hand other material required to constitute a complete application are listed in the "Application Procedure." RtnMastr - Revised 9/89 - • • ' LEGAL DESCRIPTION LOTS 9 AND 10, HARRIES GARDEN HOME TRACTS AS RECORDED IN VOLUME 34 OF PLATS, PAGE 38, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF RENTON DEC ® 7 1989 REC WE O // \N / I I ���� �00 I en °� / /94.66 7a ZN 550./5 725.; /75 en V- ti . ; 43.9 1 / ,d89 5/E ° ill ° \�� / ,�� fl W 6,4 �, yv Qi ti o 9 .,' _tom\� No i� ,7,0 15 g N 0,EZy o o, car �� Lti O kt s. ti ti 4a87 Q� uJ / a }o (./.) 698.3/ - - _ I. ti O aG• a �J 0 ��1 / N W O' I-I ti (� Q w �° 31� ��T �1 �° • o = 68,os 8 a' Q i2,� �^' .� / N 14 /57 Z63.43 _ ' / 2. N 67/. 47 4 �` / .z. a �L /t4/ CO G,no ,� 3�6 Th 3 �, a ,46) .06 ,. , ,,_ . oo I3 I- �°� • u _ N /60 /5/ o �-¢¢.63 /` o �' T g038 94z.�� _ N E / 1- J �}8 0 a $6 r�� �u n`� '� .c/89 45 3o E' A. = N 001 o, 2/2.o� ., Q t9 /5 63.36 Z Ro• L6 .73� 0 D � Z�r� '� o to 5 3 o N RI 2 I 6/7 79 6�°y7 �0° ti a 8tt \ 1°I'Z 0 a NID 1 r a LLJ J Zb ° ® ti 24p.0� �`\` 6 i fig- o � r. 3 - ,p4 I I 10 og �� O 6 ����� � . o, 1 /O,s6400 8641 8 50. 4 3 2f 83 poi 3 �f� 2 ,a -.r:a k ci ,� j .,r 318 --- 268./8 ,,, 6 63.36 .. is ua > 3 k: rR' t ✓ .t �4 a x �r..1;4 / 7 tl :�� }. ' q b 6B y- Lo „, \ �� ,�" .� ,�' t eta n . r- ,qqk ...�Y 'k i".#t'r •y-c.-.. ' ^" r114`tt !. ° w3 t 1.s t r �ti = 'd• a�w �..� ,k••• �.�41c �Hd'r."� J� 1 t- _8 Ili ‘Q to Q 1 "' ` * -Y,-1. Os,j, t . ,w �"�,.'r ( Y Y �+:.'::.'�s't{fts,.. ' x-.. ' k w �' :'' - 70 1` et1 I �`y�ia z; � As37� d f a� cf,d' OAS i 6 Cj$�10 %+ _ 2 �` y, Yam, r �o-. F k eta •.*x % sib ti 0 0 0 ).86 36.4 .� a _t om «� `� r t '" {� Q! 69�a In 1o°I of ki P s.;.r -�-a,..-f s c �, 7� -,'�i� „p 't�a' o. a�� r-,:. YT I�� O fs.. _ s , ` .,v . y e sir- _ r •# � - �` O . t\ 9- /f 034 0 to as_ - 4,Rn ' "c ,,,---'z-. { .:.fit`,Y�C s r1/4. . ; v .4 . 14 Q fl• •92 Q� ' (� !!! a 8� 3/-52E' N / p 24 V ' cv ; .-,,e, ;-` ,. ►�, ., - '` „f ` ,.. t .a "� , ' , . g' w• °° 6Zh 4 `* / 6h 15p y O ►� R ti 82 9Z ti J Z Z 6 /45' la Ri RI 4 qho tx3 h 4 8 fl R n, ofce /Z�a ID 36,�ti it, CO �R 2 Qo o CD �►° 88.7 w 4'��''3� ° l $ 2 y3°ly 0 98./i3 Z 34 04 [26.S' 0 677 69.'e d w 240 °° ep o ti o° zoo a o ° ` sn 5Z°y Z `0 $� o G Q g° & °. 2 tiF ,, 8 2 8� s,o �i� 2 3��5 - N o �Z, �k I A ®si >n o� � 1 1 ` _ /86.s8 1 g36.6a 2so 42.96' '9�y \8'0 6 as i .,iry 9� tt s \ 1 4 e c-9y`. ST 160.I N E --....3, \ .. \ t 401;040 (6) , Ri ,';' ° c,1,, k) -c-5-r- S C 9 rf/,q� y \ 1 CC) 13 '° G' / z00 �53.�c ,' �� 7 55 55 ea, ` >8.08 �� �y 4 1Z 7Sa °� 9° 10� : IJ, �, �, 1 4 �.�� A� gj6oi�� N a ¢ h ego 500° 6 �pi�io agZo, PROJECT NARRATIVE The accompanying site plan approval submission package is for a 2.6 acre site located on Aberdeen Avenue N.E. , immediately North of Aberdeen Avenue's intersection with Sunset Boulevard. In July or August of 1989 the site received a rezone from R-1 Residential to R-3 Residential (File #R-104-88) . The Hearing Examiner recommended that the site be rezoned with the requirement that the applicant comply with the conditions imposed by the ERC on April 5, 1989. The applicant will comply with those requirements. The site, with R-3 zoning, is allowed 65 units. Restrictions, based on sensitive slopes, reduces the maximum allowed density to 62 units. This proposal is for 60 units and, therefore, well within the allowed density limits. The applicant has submitted preliminary plans to the Planning Department for presubmission review. Lenora Blauman and Don Erickson reviewed the preliminary plan and recommended design adjustments to building siting. The applicant has incorporated these recommendations into this submittal. This proposal incorporates a resident congregation area in a covered gazebo structure which will also house the complex's mailboxes and bulletin boards. The applicant is also proposing another gazebo with attached wood deck and barbecue located on the western edge of the complex. This will provide the residents a passive recreation area with a quiet setting and pleasant territorial view. A tot lot with a play structure is provided for children in the complex. The applicant is hoping to start construction in June of 1990 with completion scheduled for December of 1990. PLANNING Divis ITy op ION ritiVTON DEC 0 7 1989 p : OOco—.O,SA C ITY OF. RENTON • ENV R NMENTAL;CHECKLIST: Purpose of Checklist: The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), Chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probably significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be lone) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. Instructions for Applicants: This environmental checklist ask you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your,own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or,if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply". Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any ad,ditional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impacts. Use of Checklist for Nonproiect Proposals: (Please Type or Print Legibly) Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply". IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D). For nonproject actions (actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs), the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: 60 Unit Apartment Complex (name not yet determined) 2. Name of applicant: SUNSET GARDEN LIMITED PARTNERSHIP 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: (Owner) •Sunset Garden Ltd. (owner) : 4. Date checklist prepared: December 5, 1989 18868 S.E. 42nd St.Issaquah, Wa. 98027 P (Contact) : Riebe & Associates 5. Agency requesting checklist: PlanningDe tartment. 3025 112th Ave. N.E, Bellevue, ' Wa. 98004 ANNiivG C ►TyopR o N DEC 0 7 1989 (Pail VE.i= 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Construction Start in June, 1990 Construction Completion in December, 1990 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansions, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. NO 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. - Site Plan, Grading plan, Landscape Plan, Soils Report SEPA Checklist for -rezone' '(file # R-104;-88) Rezone Staff Report to Hearing Examiner, Hearing Examiner Report on rezone. 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If,yes, explain. NO 10. List any governmental approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. Site Plan Approval Bixilding Permits 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not:need to repeat those answers on this page. Construction of a 60 unit apartment complex together with passive 'recreation areas, congregation areas, carports 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the • precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topography map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans . required by the agency; you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. Lots 9 & 10 of Harries Garden Tracts. ADDRESS: 909 & 951 Aberdeen Ave. N.E.. at ''the 'intersection of Aberdeen Ave. N.E. and Sunset Blvd. in ,Renton Washington. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS Earth a. General description of the site (circle one); flat, rolling, hilly, steep, slopes, mountainous, other Gentely sloping. 5%' b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope?) Varies— site averages 5'%+ for 90% of site with steeper slopes (I5%-25%) on west edge c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, scaly, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. See attached soils report d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. NO ,. -3- 110:, e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. Cuttingand filling will be balanced, therefore on import or export of fill material are anticipated. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. Some erosion may occur during the grading of the site. A temporary erosion control plan will be prepared. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? Approximately 49% h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: Installation of siltation basins, drainage velocity 2. AIR dissipators, re-planting of exposed areas. The installation of temporary drainage control structures during construction. a. What types of.emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Increase in CO .levels at the intersection of Aberdeen and Sunset' Blvd. during peak hour traffic. b. Are there any off-site sources of emission? None that are known. ,c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: Implementation of sprinklering systems during construction to control dust. 3. WATER a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. NO 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. NO 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. NONE 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. Drainage will be collected in subsurface systems sufficient to meet storm water discharge requirements of the City of Renton, 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. NO 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. NO -4- b. Ground: • 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? I Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. Ground water will not be withdrawn. Water will be collected from parking lots and roof structures by tightlines from catch basins and downspouts and discharged into the storm system. 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: - Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. There will be no septic tanks. There will be no waste material discharged into the ground water. c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? • • Will this water flow into other waters, If so, describe.Water runnoff source will be from roofs and parking lots and will be collected by tight lines from downspouts and catch basins then diverted to the storm water detention sys. The water will then be discharged to the water 2) Could waste material enter ground or-surface waters? IT so, gennraliy describe.course at a controlled NO rate. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: Surface water movement should be unaffected by this development. Ground water at each building foundation will be collected by perf. pipe and then diverted by a tight• line system to the storm water detention system. 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: xx deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other xx evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other xx shrubs xx grass crop or grain wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, .bullrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants: water lily, eel grass, milfoil, other other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Vegetation will be removed at each building pad and parking lot. Existing vegetation will be preserved to the maximum extent possible. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. NONE d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measure to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: Native species of vegetation,, . trees, shrubs, and flowers will be used in landscaping as well as compatible ornamental varieties. 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: Birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other Robins, sparrows Mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other Fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other 6 -5- b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. NONE c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain NO d. Proposed measures to preserve-or enhance wildlife, if any: There is no wildlife on this site with the possible exception of mice, moles, and squirrels. The existing pasture, garden like setting will be altered with this project. 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, wood, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Electricity will be the primary source of energy. Used for heating and lights. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar_ energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. NO c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: The project will meet or exceed the requirements of the state energy code.' 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. YES. Adjacent to the west side of the.:.site is a set of power lines chich have current transmission rates of 55kV, anticipated rates of 115kV, and maximum possible transmission rates of 230kV. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. No special emergency services will be required. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: An 80' building steback for all dwelling units will provide miti- gation from 'the power lines such that the structures will not exceed 1g0 mikliegaus. - 1) What types of noise exist in the areas which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? Traffic noise from Aberdeen Ave. is not anticipated to be a problem. No other source of noise 'is anticipated to have any affect on the project. 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. The predominent noise source is vehicular traffic,especially during const. Normal working hours will be observed. - 3) Proposed,measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: Natural vegetation in the project cill contribute 'to the reduction of noise from the site.:, Normal hours of work will be adhered to during const. 8. Land and Shoreline Use • a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent,properties? Residential multifamily R-3and R-4 to the north and south. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. NO -6- 11, c. Describe any structures on the site. Two single family residences with garages. d. Will anystructures be demolished? If so, what? Yes. Existing single family structures will be removed. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? Multifamily Residential R-3 f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Multifamily Residential R-3 g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? N/A h. Has any part} of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. Yes— Slope areas on west edge of the site. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? 118 people approximately. j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? 4 people approximately k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: People being dis- placed have purchased new homes with proceeds of land sale. 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: This proposal complies with the comp. plan for the, site and it complies with the zoning designation of the site.' 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. 60 units of middle income housing b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. 2 existing single family residences will be eliminated. Assume middle income 'housing. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: No housing impacts and anticipated. 10. Aesthetics • • a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including, antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed. Thirty feet. Exterior materials will be a combination of wood and vinyl sided buildings. b. What views in'the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? No views will be altered or obstructed. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any:Retention of natural landscaping to the maximum extent possible and generous added landscaping will reduce the impacts of the new buildings. The building designs will be in character with the surrounding 11. Light and Glare neighborhood. -7- ' a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? Light and glare will be increased by the reflection i. from the windows and from traffic movement at night. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? NO c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? No sources exist that would negatively affect the project. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: Landscaping, fencing, and light shields will be used to help control light and glare. • 12. Recreation a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? Lake Washington Beach. 800 yds to NE is Highland Elem. School playground 500 yds E is McKnight JR HS playground and Highlands Park. On site will be a gazebo w/ BBQ and a tot lot with play structure. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. NO c. " Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: Project mgmt. will set rules and hours for the use of the onsite rec. fac. 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. NO b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. NONE EXIST c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: N/A -8- 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. Aberdden Ave. NE and Sunset Blvd serve the site. Access will be at the NE corner of the site. (see vicinity map) b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? Yes. Metro serves the site on Sunset Blvd. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? 105 stalls will be provided in the project. 4 stalls will be eliminated. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private? See attached traffic report. e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. NO f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. S e at ched t aff ' c re ort g. See measures rto reuuce or control transportation impacts, if any: Carpooling and metro transit could reduce daily traffic. A walking trail to Boeing is 9oo yds away. 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. Approx. 1.5 fire and emergency calls are estimated. Little impact to the schools is anticipated. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. Organize block watch program—support bond issues—develop on—site and off—site trail systems—develop on—site rec. fac. provide on—site site maintenance program. 16. Utilities a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other. All of the above are available b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Electrical— Puget Power Const. will use elec. Telephone— Bell ,System • water and telephone Sewer— City of Renton only. Water- City of Renton Gas— Washington Natural Gas Refuse- Rainier. Disposal/ ff/$111°' -9- ' C. SIGNATURE / I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Proponent: � . � , • � o Name Printed: Sunset Garden Limited Partnership by: Riebe and Associates, Inc. (Agent) E. Dennis Riebe, President J l -10- D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET'FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (This sheet should only be used for actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs. Do not use this sheet for project actions.) Because`these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms. 1. How would, the proposal be likely to increase discharge to- water; emissions to air:. f production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: 2 How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life? ' \l Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are: 3. How would the_proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? Proposed measures to protector conserve energy and natural resources are: I 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? . Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: 5. How would the proposal'be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? J 4* , t. SUNSET GARDENS APARTMENTS 909-951 ABERDEEN RENTON, WASHINGTON JOB NO. 888-11G PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF RENTON JAN 2 21990 , TABLE OF CONTENTS Conclusions Page 2 Recommendations Page 3 Foundation Design Page 3 Structural Fill Page 4 Slab on Grade Page 5 Reinforced Earth Page 5 Construction Monitoring Page 6 General Page 6 J miCASCADE GbJA CHNICAL 41` A DMSION OF CASCADE TESTING LABORATORY,INC. 12919 N.E.126TH PLACE KIRKLAND.WASHINGTON 98034 (206)821-5080 FAX:(206)823-2203 January 5, 1990 Job No. 888-11G Derus Development Company 18868 S.E. 42nd Street Issaquah, Washington 98027 Attention: Steve Derus Reference: Sunset Gardens Apartments 909-951 Aberdeen Renton, Washington Dear Mr. Derus: At the request of the architect, Dennis Riebe, we have reviewed the information in our files on the above lot and the plans he provided to address the requirements of the City of Renton in their letter dated December 19, 1989. This report provides conclusions and recommendations for the proposed 62 unit residential complex, parking areas and recreational amenities. We have reviewed the previous subsurface study we completed for this site dated August 25, 1988, a copy of which is enclosed, and the Site Plan sheet P-2 dated November 16, 1989 prepared by Dodds ' Engineering. The conclusions and recommendations provided here are . based on the subsurface information previously obtained for our 1988 soils report on the site, and on the preliminary plans provided to us. The additional recommendations provided in this report are supplemental to our 1988 soils report, and are based on the new site plan provided to us. E J CASCADE GEOTECHNICAL ( I January 2, 1990 Job No. 888-11G Derus Development Company Page 2 We understand that the proposed development is to consist of six (6) multi-story wood framed buildings with paved on-site parking. It appears that the site grading will consist of both cuts and fills, with fill placed for support of building loads and parking areas. The plans we reviewed showed rockeries up to eight (8) feet high supporting the fill pads where there were significant grade changes. We were not provided with detailed design plans at the time of this report. We should be engaged to review the final plans prior to construction to confirm that our recommendations have been followed. CONCLUSIONS It is our conclusion that the site is suitable for the proposed development. We recommend that fill slopes be supported with structural walls. Rockeries should only be placed against fill slopes that are constructed as a reinforced earth fill, as discussed in the Recommendations section of this report. The fill proposed on the west end of the site will also require special consideration during placement and compaction due to the proximity of the existing slope. Detailed recommendations are provided in the Recommendations section of this report. f v - CASCADE GEOTECHNICAL January 2, 1990 Job No. 888-11G Derus Development Company Page 3 RECOMMENDATIONS 7 Foundation Design The undisturbed native soil or adequately compacted structural fill is suitable for support of a 2000 psf bearing value. All foundation excavations should be free from disturbed soil, organic material, or standing water at the time the concrete is placed. Footings should be placed on natural bearing soil or on a uniformly thick structural fill pad. Individual strip footings should not be placed on both native soil and structural fill without special detailing to accommodate the potential for differential settlement. If grade requirements demand that footings be seated partially on native soil and partially on compacted fill, we recommend that the native soils be excavated at least one (1) foot below the footing grade and replaced with compacted fill. We recommend that the foundations for buildings E and F, located on the western side of the site, be seated directly on the native soil. It appears from the plans which we reviewed that there is up to five (5) feet of fill proposed on the north portion of building E, and under all of building F. Due to the proximity of these buildings to the existing sloped area, we recommend that the footings extend down through the fill to the native soil. The only other building with fill required is the west end of Building D. To avoid any potential for differential settlement, we recommend extending the footings for Building D through the fill to the native soil. i .1 CASCADE GEOTECHNICAL January 2, 1990 Job No. 888-11G Derus Development Company ff Page 4 All footings should be placed at least eighteen (18) inches below outside finished grade for frost protection. Structural Fill Structural fill should be placed on a flat subgrade of native soil that is free of organic debris or standing water. The on-site non- organic soil may be used for a fill material if conditions are maintained at or near the optimum moisture content. The on-site soils will not be suitable as fill if they become wet during placement .due to the high content of fine grained material. An imported fill material will be necessary if wet weather is encountered during fill placement. We recommend using an all weather fill that conforms` to the following gradation: Sieve Size Percent Passina 4 inch 100 #4 75 - 25 #200 5% maximum based on the percent passing the #4 sieve All fill should be placed on a flat subgrade only. It will be necessary to cut benches into the existing slope wider than a vibratory roller for fill placed on the western portion of the site. The benches should be cut into native soil and be free of all debris, organic soils, or standing water at the time the fill is placed. - CASCADE GEOTECHNICAL January 2, 1990 Job No. 888-11G Derus Development Company Page 5 Slab on Grade The slab on grade may be supported on adequately compacted structural fill with a capillary break, as discussed in our previous report. There is some potential for differential settlement between the slab floor and foundation walls if the slab is supported on fill and the footings are seated on native soil . All fill should be placed in at most twelve (12) inch loose lifts and compacted to at least 95% of the ASTM D-1557 maximum dry density. We should be engaged to be present continuously during placement of the fill to confirm that adequate compaction is reached. Reinforced Earth • It appears that rockeries up to eight (8) feet high are proposed for fills on the northeast and central portion of the site, based on the plans we reviewed. Rockeries should not be used against a fill slope unless the slope is constructed as a Reinforced Earth Wall. We have enclosed a sketch of a reinforced earth structure with this report. We recommend that a geotextile fabric be placed and wrapped around the face of the bank. The fabric should extend at least eight (8) feet into the fill bank and be wrapped around the face with a three (3) foot overlap. We recommend a maximum of eighteen (18) inches of spacing between the fabrics. The fill should be placed in accordance with the structural fill section of this report. CASCADE GEOTECHNICAL January 2, 1990 Job No. 888-11G Derus Development Company Page 6 Once the reinforced fill bank has been constructed, a rockery facing may be placed. The rockery should be constructed as shown on the sketch with the base row keyed into native soil at least twelve (12) inches, have a four (4) inch perforated rigid pipe bedded and backfilled in pea gravel placed behind the base row, and backfill of the wall consisting of 2 to 4 inch diameter quarry • spalls. We should be engaged to monitor the construction of the reinforced earth wall, the fill compaction, and construction of the rockery, in order to confirm that the design specifications are met. Construction Monitoring We should be engaged to observe the site preparation and fill placement to provide any additional or alternate recommendations. The construction of the Reinforced Earth structure with a rockery facing should be monitored continuously by our office to verify proper construction. General The recommendations provided here are in addition to the previous recommendations in our report dated August 25, 1988. The plans we reviewed for this report were preliminary and did not show any detailed foundation design calculations. We should be engaged to review the final plans prior to construction to verify that our recommendations have been followed. CASCADE GEOTECHNICAL January 2, 1990 Job No. 888-11G Derus Development Company Page 7 I We trust that this provides sufficient information for your needs. Should you have any questions, feel free to contact us at any time. Sincerely, CASCADE OTECHNIC' ° 0wsyp V A -17;;Zi/ • fin' 11\ ". f-fe E. 9a.6FCISTVX s.40 � Pet r• Jewett P incipal Engineer ����D�`L�aG ineering Geologist PJ:lal Enclosure: Report I • is • SUNSET GARDEN APARTMENTS REINFORCED EARTH WALL/ROCKERY • CROSS SECTION • 8" MINUMUM OF r 31 2"- 4" CRUSHED ROCK ^ sva Ps'� rib 7 WM :A`•\Iq : . Q Dealli�wi'I��6:0g:geb.'461i*(•-116lit464:::. !�VL MAX. CO °•�� .�.,.f r•.�s ! yt•�L�,.a�ctelis �f�. , �.�.tIli es vi °eao ::::.� COMPACT:DoFILLti�r �} 18" a e ��� e.:�'�l �I�= l. 7�I Ire • �, It t..., W V ° '► .�, AS PER SPECIFICATIONS I:0 ''‘ f e ��i, L�_ tee.. ./.I._d::..' •�i t* •. i0 a ,� l r?t i t 1, I� 7.1 18" Rrf1 �JI_ a ;�1.%�1�1`/�,�.•����1i1��`1•�y���%1�1 j• ti ►4��. • �•��ti'0•. �a��•=-•i5 GEOTEXTILE FABRIC —I`iii —O ` i/��1�1 q We it �nlll i� �nnl .� �unl� '�% n�/� ///14 ////'�/�,. /'�/� ---- ��/'a/��� //•�//��\� ' AS PER SPECIFICATIONS �\ NATIVE BEARING SOIL l `� \�=II11II \�=1111IIi��I�11II ,, I i � l icl4. Ii.O�`�II��I) Illi � I Ali"4_,_,• Ili � l 4" PERFORATED PIPE - 8' MIN. • ' FROM SKETCH - Job No. SCALE : NOT TO SCALE CASCADE GEOTECHNICAL 888-11G • A DIVISION OF CASCADE TESTING LABORATORY,INC. LOCATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE ' 4 ,-,Et 12919 N.E. 126TH PLACE KIRKLAND,WASHINGTON 98034 Dad• Dwn. By Eng •G.ol KIRKLAND:(206)821-5080 SEATTLE:(206)525.6700 01/08/89 HLA CASCADE GEOTECHNICAL GEOTEXTILE FABRIC SPECIFICATIONS Grab Tensile 140 lbs Mullen Burst 350 psi Punture 70 lbs Trapezoidal Tear 45 lbs SUNSET GARDEN APARTMENTS 909 AND 951 ABERDEEN RENTON, WASHINGTON JOB NO. 888-11G I • TABLE OF CONTENTS Scope Page 1 Subsurface Conditions Page 2 Conclusions Page 1 Recommendations Page 3 Site Preparation Page 3 Foundation Design Parameters Page 3 Drainage Page 4 Slab-on-Grade Floor Page 4 General Page 5 Appendix A Test Pit Location Map Appendix B Test Pit Logs r.. Y , r , CASCADE GEOTECHNICAL Mil A DIVISION OF CASCADE TESTING LABORATORY,INC 12919 N.E.126TH PLACE KIRKLAND,WASHINGTON 98034 KIRKLAND:(206)821-5080 SEATTLE:(206)525-6700 August 25, 1988 ,- Job No. 888-11G Leroy Lowe P.O. Box 3972 Bellevue, Washington 98009 Reference: Sunset Garden Apartments 909 and 951 Aberdeen Renton, Washington Dear Mr. Lowe : At your request, we have completed a subsurface study at the above site . The purpose of our study was to evaluate the subsur- face soils and ground water conditions of the site. This report summarizes our field observations and provides conclusions and recommendations for the proposed development. . SCOPE This report provides recommendations that specifically address the development of the above site for wood framed apartment buildings. Recommendations for site preparation, foundation design, slab-on- grade floors and drainage requirements are provided. No building plans had been developed at the time of our study. We understand that nine ( 9 ) wood framed, three story apartment build- ings utilizing a spread footing foundation with either crawl space or slab on grade floors are anticipated for the site. We should be retained to review the final plans once they are completed to provide any additional or alternate recommendations that may be necessary. CASCADE GEOTECHNICAL August 25, 1988 Job No. 888-11G Leroy Lowe Page 2 SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS The site is located at 909 and 951 Aberdeen Street in Renton, Wash- ington on the west side of the road. The site slopes slightly to the west for approximately 550 feet to the top of a moderately steep slope. Two wood' framed houses were located on the east end of the property with lawn, gardens and fruit trees on most of the site . The slope on the western edge of the property was wooded with tall fir and maple trees. Subsurface conditions were examined by observing the excavation of nine (9 ) backhoe test pits . Test pits were located by our engi- neering geologist who described and classified the soils in the field. Representative samples were returned to our laboratory for additional analysis. Test pit locations, topography, and the proposed building locations are shown on the site map in Appendix A. Detailed soil descrip- tions and test pit logs are located in Appendix B. Elevations discussed in this report are from the surface grade at the time of our study. Test pits showed glacially deposited silty sand and sand underlying a one ( 1 ) to two (2 ) foot layer of topsoil . The silty sand was dense to very dense , gray and damp at depth. A weathered zone was noted to a depth of around three (3 ) feet. The native soil appears to be glacial till of the Vashon Stade. No ground water or subsurface seepage was noted in the test pits we observed. CASCADE GEOTECHNICAL ' August 25, 1988 Job No. 888-11G Leroy Lowe Page 3 CONCLUSIONS It is our conclusion that the site is well suited for the proposed development if careful and cautious construction techniques are followed. The moisture sensitive soils noted on the site will require that wet weather construction be avoided. RECOMMENDATIONS Site Preparation We recommend that construction be done during an extended period of dry weather . The existing site conditions are such that wet weather constructions will likely cause significant additional construction costs. All duff , vegetation, and topsoil should be removed from the build- ing and paved areas prior to construction. The topsoil may be stockpiled for later use as planting material. We should be engaged to be on-site during site preparation to pro- vide any immediate recommendations that may be necessary. Foundation Design Parameters The native silty sand is well suited for the support of a spread footing foundation. A maximum safe bearing value of 2000 psf may be used for the foundation design. We understand that all building foundations will be seated on un- disturbed native soil. No fill is expected for the proposed pro- ject. We should review the grading plan to provide our comments. CASCADE GEOTECHNICAL August 25, 1988 Job No. 888-11G Leroy Lowe Page 4 Foundation excavations should be seated on undisturbed native silty sand that is firm and dry, free of organic material, loose soil, and/or standing water. We should confirm bearing on all foundation excavations prior to placing the footing forms. Footings should be seated at least eighteen ( 18) inches below out- side finished grade for frost protection. We understand that a minimum of fifty ( 50 ) feet will be maintained from the building edge to the top of the slope on the west side of the site . Mr . Lowe has conducted an analysis of the mine hazard in the area and has informed us that the site is not located above any underground shafts. Drainage A continuous, rigid, perforated four (4 ) inch diameter drain line bedded and backfilled in at least eighteen ( 18) inches of pea gravel should be placed at the base of all perimeter footings and tightlined to the storm system. Roof drains should be tightlined to the storm system separately from the footing drains to avoid backflow. The paved areas should be sloped and curbed to direct surface water to suitable catch basins. ( Slab-On-Grade Floor We understand that slab-on-grade floors may be used for the propos- ed buildings . The undisturbed native silty sand is well suited for a slab subgrade. The subgrade should be free of organic material, • CASCADE GEOTECHNICAL August 25, 1988 Job No. 888-11G Leroy Lowe Page 5 wet soil, or standing water at the time concrete is placed. We should confirm soil conditions of the subgrade prior to placing the slab. We recommend placing a minimum of four (4) inches of a free draining material, such as a clean coarse sand that has less than 5% passing the #200 sieve or pea gravel, under the slab to act as a capillary break. The capillary break should be covered with a vapor barrier that may then be covered with one ( 1 ) to two (2 ) inches of free draining material to aid in concrete curing. General • We should be engaged to be on-site during site preparation to pro- vide any alternate or immediate recommendations that may be neces- sary. We should be engaged to review the final plans and to con- firm soil conditions in all foundation excavations. We expect the on-site conditions to reflect our findings; however, variations may occur. Should soil conditions be encountered that cause concern and/or are not discussed herein, we should be con- tacted immediately to determine if additional or alternate recom- mendations are required. This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of Leroy Lowe for specific application to Sunset Garden Apartments at 909 and 951 Aberdeen Street in Renton, Washington in accordance with generally { accepted soils and foundation engineering practices. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made. -',- CASCADE GEOTECHNICAL August 25, 1988 Job No. 888-11G Leroy Lowe . Page 6 Thank you for this opportunity to work with you on this project. Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact us at any time. Sincerely, CASCADE GEOTECHNICAL 2.... , , George E. Lamb, P.E. Principal Engineer ;;7L----- Peter, wett J e Engineering Geologist PJ:lal APPENDIX A r : - , . • . • , , _ 1 _ SUNSET GARDEN4PARTMENTS • 1 TEST PIT LOCATI01' MAP f 7 V I _ : 2 1 I / ////7/7 _ 1 95 77 (( / /-Km) \ ( TP7 _ 1)T.P-8 rlri i 11 IJ ( I 105 . I I I I = I V I I )+T.P. I E 110il Ll11 L _____J L______)1 /I————71 / 115 -- 120 -9 i 125/ /) / / P.6ç /\ _ / /\ / // \\\ / / N 130 \ O ( ( 1 (1.- ) 4.1 • f- n---1 r----I� / 0 135 / /\\ �— ca I.,../\' Q c 11 T.P-4-1 f J i 1 I T.P-3 140 T.P-5 �� T.F-2 1 I1 ® / l/ I rj I - iI 145 fLij I / L___i 3 1 \ k j 1 r ---- __/ ______--- =/ r----- ....-_,N...:2_____ _____- 7._.., ..._, _____ 150 155/ (----n 160 165 ) / 1 170 175 180 185 190 195 200 205 SCALE : In = 401 Li] Proposed Buildings - CASCADE GEOTECHNICAL LOCATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE A DIVISION OF CASCADE TESTING LABORATORY, INC. 12919 N.E.126TH PLACE KIRKLAND,WASHINGTON 98034 Taken from Site Plan by Leroy C. Lowe, Arch. KIRKLAND:(206)821.5080 SEATTLE:(206)525.6700 Date Job No. Dwn.By Eng./Geo. 08 / 16 /88 888 - IIG HLA -T ; l APPENDIX B • • • i T.'P.- .. 1� Soil Description r lassification T.P.- 2 c.-il Description & Classification 0 - 0 - 6"SOD/TOPSOIL 0 ..•,:..,. 0 - 1.5'TOPSOIL/ROTOTILLED SOIL "`'='��: 6"- 2'SILTY SAND; W/SOME GRAVEL,BROWN, r • . DRY, DENSE, WEATHERED TILL. (SM) �il 1.5'- 3'SILTY SAND; WITH SOME GRAVEL, •`` 2'- 7'SILTY SAND; WITH SOME GRAVEL, BROWN, DRY DENSE, WEATHERED GRAY, DAMP, VERY DENSE, TILL. :s`., '_.: TILL. SM • - (SM) • s:•4 3'- 7'SILTY SAND; WITH SOME GRAVEL, al .= i' GRAY, DAMP VERY DENSE, TILL. j _5 -5 f (SM) T.D. = 7.0' T.D. = 7.0' -10 -10 . Notes: Notes: t f T.P.- 3 Soil Description & Classification T.P.- 4 Soil Description & Classification • 0 •�:• , 0 - 6"SOD/TOPSOIL 0 ...;L. ,f0 - 2'TOPSOIL/DISTURBED SOIL _: 6"- 3'SILTY SAND; WITH SOME GRAVEL, M BROWN, DRY, DENSE, WEATHERED :::: , TILL. (SM) 2'- 4'CLAYEY SILT; GRAY, DAMP, STIFF •'�: TO VERY STIFF. (ML) 3'- 8'SILTY SAND; WITH SOME GRAVEL, GRAY, DAMP, VERY DENSE, TILL. (SM) """. 4'- 8'SAND; WITH SOME SILT, GRAY, -5 -,': ` " • � -5 �`1§) DENSE TO VERY DENSE, LAMINATED, ;r t' DAMP, FINE GRAINED. (SP) T.D. = 8.0' T.D. = 8.0' . -10 -10 Notes: Notes: TEST PIT LOG ;. IPII CASCADE GEOTECHNICAL Sunset Garden Apts. A DMSION OF CASCADE TESTING LABORATORY. INC. Date 08/16/88 Job No. 888 - 11G Dwn.BY HLA Geo/ Eng. / T.RI. 5 Soil Descriotion • 7.1assificalion IP.- 6 .soil Description & Classification 9 r - 6"TOPSOIL ° :..--z...0 - 8"TOPSOIL/DUFF . . "M 6"- 3'SAND; WITH SOME SILT, MINOR ---,:i • -i...:t: 8.- 3'SILTY SAND; WITH SOME GRAVEL, GRAVEL, MOTTLED, DAMP, MEDIUM -14“. BROWN, DRY, DENSE, WEATHERED .:1 DENSE, WEATHERED. (SP) TILL. (SM) , : ......• ! :.••:. :;••.;•: •• 3' - 7'SAND; WITH SOME SILT, MINOR '..i,. •:*i 3'- 7'SILTY SAND; WITH SOME GRAVEL, . .... GRAY, DAMP, VERY DENSE, TILL. GRAVEL, BROWN, DAMP, DENSE, --;....:1 .'. '•• .f FINE GRAINED. (SP) :11 li:: f:t::; (SM) -5 V.• -5 —t.::-.14:: ,:--.:•:i. :.•• : •::k3 ::. 4:1.••-:5: •.: :.• •-: :it•:: :.: liii ••:. jg i i. ok* T.D. = 7.0' T.D. = 7.0' -10 -10 Notes: Notes: T.P.- 7 Soil Description & Classification Ti'.- 8 . Soil Description & Classification 0 ;::;:...z.. 0 - 2'TOPSOIL/DUFF ' 0 - -,z;E0 - 1'TOPSOIL g&11- 3'SILTY SAND; WITH SOME GRAVEL, BROWN, DRY, DENSE, WEATHERED i:Fii.i. 2'- 7'SILTY SAND; WITH SOME GRAVEL, .., I I ••:?::':i"::- , TILL. (SM) ;:.. • :i GRAY, DAMP, VERY DENSE, TILL. :::. ..-•:. • ro ......y; :7. 31— 6'SILTY SAND; WITH SOME GRAVEL,(SM) GRAY, DAMP, VERY DENSE, TILL. ••• it'Er:- : . (SM) iri.5.7:? -5 --• •• ::Y- -5 1.-:.:•:,:•?. .. ::::. .::::*:.:•0::- 5.M i: T.D. = 6.0' *:.; T.D. = 7.0' _ - - - -10 -10 Notes: Notes: TEST PIT 'LOG CASCADE GEOTECHNICAL Sunset Garden Apts. A DMSION OF CASCADE TESTING LABORATORY, INC. Date 08/16/88 Job No. 888 - 11G Dwn.BY HLA Geo/Eng. 777/- T.P.-' 9 I Soil Description & _Classification IR- so,, Description & Classification 0 - 0 — 6"TOPSOIL 0 ....91• .116 - 2.5'SILTY SAND; WITH SOME GRAVEL, BROWN, DRY, DENSE, WEATHERED - T TILL. (SM) • ••!!.• 5'- 61SILTY SAND; WITH SOME GRAVEL, GRAY, DAMP, VERY DENSE, TILL. - • (SM) -5 y -5 T.D. = 6.0' -10 -10 Notes: Notes: T.P.- Soil Description & Classification T.P.- Soil Description & Classification 0 0 • • -5 -5 — - -10 Notes: Notes: TEST PIT LOG CASCADE GEOTECHNICAL Sunset Garden A.pts. LA DAMON OF CASCADE TESTING LABORATORY.INC. Date 08/16/88 Job No. 888 - 11G Dwn.By HLA Geo/ Eng. .t UNIFIED SC--,LS CLASSIFICATr \I SYSTEM I • MAJOR DIVISIONS SYMBOL LETTER DESCRIPTION i:9::•°'4 C'0,7 0U 4.0< Well- graded gravels or gravel-sand mixtures, ivilpftqrc,••as, Gw little or no fines CLEAN •'avell: 4) .9.k 0...4...4eit GRAVEL & GRAVELS ill:•"*IIT-Ici*4. G p Poorly graded gravels or gravel-sand mixtures, laftiii*.eitVit Iiiit:?*Ailiiif little or no fines GRAVELLY . • •• • SOILS [ 1114. GM Silty gravels or gravel-sand-silt mixtures GRAVELS WITH FINES COARSE GC Clayey gravels or gravel-sand-clay mixtures 1 GRAINED .•• • ...-: Well-graded sands or gravelly sands, little or CLEAN SOILS ....,:.".°0 SW no fines : .. : .• .° S.-..4..:.:....:1.... : SAND SANDS Poorly graded sands or gravelly sands, little & li:•.:•:-:::::r:::::::: S p or no fines SANDY . i..1i1.1.2i.1 SOILS f :r; ,SM Silty sands or sand-silt mixtures • SANDS :3% •.„.:•••:•.:::::::•: WITH FINES SC Clayey sands or sand-clay mixtures • , • Inorganic silts & very fine sands, rock flour, silty M L or clayey fine sands, or clayey silts with slight• SILTS & CLAYS plasticity / C L Inorganic clays of low to medium plasticity. gravelly clays, sandy clays. silty clays or lean clays Liquid Limit Less Than 50 iiiiIii Organic silts & organic silty clays of low FINE 0 L. 1 1 1 1 plasticity . 1111111 GRAINED Inorganic silts, micaceous or diatomaceous fine SOILS 1 M H sandy or silty soils, elastic silts SILTS & CLAYS V CH Inorganic clays of high plasticity,fat clays Liquid Limit Greater Than 50 '/,',/,', Organic clays of medium to high plasticity, OH organic silts ': ..-,.-ii-1.-• HIGHLY ORGANIC SOILS ,••------• PT Peat or other highly organic soils .•••-•,... ..a.. ,:•-- ,.... ,. .,,, -........ TOPSOIL ./... .......•-• s Humus & duff layer •••••• ..... ...0, -..... -...ii. -....- -....- •.• ....- .G1. • FILL ..-.4,--...."°:••. Uncontrolled. with highly variable constituents i.- -....- ...... . .....- -41i. Y -4... ....• . SYM DATUM NOTE SYM DATUM NOTE ; BOL BOL I 2"0.D. Split Spoon Sampler Sample Interval 2 Water Level Date Recorded — irRing or Shelby Sampler Sample Interval Is Torvane Reading PSampler Pushed Sample Interval CIU Penetrometer Reading 1 . * Other Sample Type Sample Interval li Water Observation Well Tip Elevation 1:•• CASCADE GEOTECHNICAL DivNisGioN KEY CHART CASCADE TAESii LABORATORY,INC. . _....__ • -• '-.'-------li.3 Y.,va•-• • U j1 'In -- ••• • 4, % P •ket 7S ,••...4 PO * 111 1:4.1 r 1.1 :el r_. 1. • I till I sl 1 VlBeent land (41:2*2 11_ .e. 1°, 7C:.:''.; 0,52 Ac C•1 All ! ; L.-14.1 E;] rill,t9, 1 ,., a im • • ka ra.:,., V Li rt /4.0 __ 1 :.- • it) ' (8) ' (A) " .:: 1 1 t 'P.Iss ici 9 r.i.rlii ft. r rli 111•41Th re 1. ligal 143' (,• 1 4.2 I 0 :=3•7%.24-""-/ocT:f _./ _:. z ..: Ti./ T.L.124 ez, • >-":;)- . -.- 01 I.-11 ---vii . . ,- . ...„ . • o . „ -7.1- 2....•:... .,,, .. .„ ; .0, *.t.......... 2 : - ii2i0 . 4 •ii . • • 1 6 •-3 1 _ . „ us .6-- . 74 ••• •t•• -1, c c . I s T i./17 Illi I%II•,. 51 in 14. 94 ii I l II 2,.. '1 ti rt.44 i ..= sT, ".M13- :94 us • ., ',:- r•-• , I ' 1,••• ;,;/".. .,.. N:. •:•:..• , ......_ ,,,,4,:c.„.1 ..•.•irt„. _ 1:94.„ zk,.... tr. . .1 war i 1 IN i Li ...----tr- ._ •0 i.. a Ei• 1, "Elk 4 „, ...r 1.1.55 pq'.° 6.11/5r ----- .. ••:-.. •:: 0 kb • i74.ii :.: •::. •::. x u.4-- • is-o '7915 - --F. t..0.: 0 ,5920B 30-7,t)de ha....„....--- Limn'-.• .4..;:-..s-v...ii .... .:::..:i. •:!:.•::. . 11 0 Ct Dt : ...:./..::;ii:. •:•:.:i•.:: ...." . ,N). NNNNal}:t relny101411 III Lti VI . o .... c. o • . - .: '•:: •103IAC. f I l0 sed.g- .• •.• rt .9g.......3.--- ...•-• • • •' ..... • . . . • ' •••.. ••••••... ..•••.• .. •• •• •• •• •• •...... • • .• 221.4. . . . • • • ... ......•• ...••••••...... • •••. . . . . . •::. *:.. /21.471-1- §-a-TIE-- *.:. ---- ••• •• ••• • *:.:•.. .::.:. I I 11M r.L.I19 yiti!lc--•",-2, .•• . .•.• . • • 11:.•":•6.1.:••n t 0 n ' „ ... • "..: •••••• I n t .4, mg.48 , 40 .•c--cp-olik---7N:u---= '-'n.:. AC •. :„..---...:51rj6.•; _______________r_......------. opER •:,..----65 g ^ plain a --nUT..,......-: - .9 0 3•" • /1•\‘'''::,:•„•e‹,,- ...• .„..v- I 1 I [-- • i ' as 1180 1.11,1ITS••••••••...... '"•' - ycl commercial ,1(Ps .* 1, LI_ rt „.-..., t_, yr_ 5 Pi Pill 0 II a 27 .• 0 U El 0 ‘ri• /'V 1 61- u 1 - Cl u ; / s5 ti 1: apartm4 te vacs .t land • , • • • • • . C--1 Wiaigli d : ' 0 `..--r------- 4 . aper mans ,p r._____, ...- 1 , ,r.-9 iil.• N/ I 7 56 UNITS '''' 'SUNSET AO° 6sy, . ,, . 1 • 4).4, 18 Eli ii,q I CI16 5 A c TAVUt-,i , Il iv . Ire j i , 2 v . i I /LAUREL.--HEIGHTS residence --....t • 1 C-1 b .. Ingle / II p. v_b Se/035 apartments •I'' -ll 5*OT .41- -1 1 9,:••4 / i 1 C3 it 2‘./.5•,, / A CONDOMINIUM C> 0%tit. % A CONDO , L._ ' AO 9,1 residence / 1 Zri I--11-19 s; :49 5-29-40 40-.--IN 46-.-„..ti 5-453 44.4,‘ • . 17 • :: ,•:. 0?- 40.' •... i.-!.--a. , a reel denol I residenoli .•.; Z "o 4. 6-18 N ICCI3 -s, • ser '•. i „ suN . 1 VIM .... cl• t•.!) 0 .1010,,t. ••••• . -'•-•,•:-..::::Z.......-...s........ t'l • • k 1 pgpaS ' a ••01 12 f.j.' nig', p ---1_,,P,, .1 a, r.•J ,, ,,,, .J.a_ 7 0 i 1, • •- • 91' /t ,,Gi . ••.. ..... .. 01' •.`...:',. 1 -).-- 16- stir--"- ,:I--;2-9"-=;.b s.z li A ••. • 0 4 residence S-50 • ' '• 04.6e. IL NE.8. 1 OTH ,,PL. :. ' 7.!1 !3"4` 'r••••••'...... Li j 1 residoawat ii : i F5-7.1. ::.•'wet ariN4-410.,, ? •ci vacant land •.41 Um •• JOHN L. - .41 , WI'..-1 c. I ,- .tz, ..:,'AT. •:‘,1 r..: 12n1 .....- . ..: o 'IPW T? 15 • i 4ANATT I\ 10,', V .';: le. 97 • r, .a? $. c---0-1-- I '...... s. c'. _. • CC..698.3/ r Went, 11311). 14; is).r.Thi • c.••n 4 ...n1 :-...,, ..• .... ••,,It2,,,,, I i 1 •.••...-...,H.A 3".•:*.i3.I•..>....).....4.:..• • • vacant land vvr i, v•.;-Avaca1-nt-3 T-la nd 1I 4a 3,.g9,I .01141 /”3/ ,•!p`'avi rloi0zao)7i1,,s..31a-dIV..:A.d,o..10i2Ie‘.rGft'n31.c4.7,1/.511074,1.14.S.A4.tC &z--F-E PcS:1rc.a••.*! S eiis•.ii.9t 5iA E En1. .7 43/ 2S . resid0e 13 71130 IIal -i°99re'sidbl. 777 i4 : i 90 /09.94 IO9 , . INresidence . D ( '.' I N. 10TH --- - - T• 516.Lyt) .0g ' "sidinali •••.1 %•••• . ..... residence in '-•(/ of t strI 5 ", •••219:•• . -A - A/7 79 ... ."affl , ) . .. • .:1 41 vPLL I Cr; .iti-ol ••••: ,1111 El all ,, c f, q 1,.,*; rsZi t•t3 " 4.; •• re:! •••-r-.. • .16.... r _ . , . i , aperfmaintssti 10.1 • .... ..... 1. vacant land vacant land • IF R-3 • in I . . t... I .; - • i: pci 6 a 7 Al. 9 10 II 12 13 .•:•-•(:'. 4 ' . „ 4,, .. .'' • . . • ''' I 1 71.., • i - 26A la •5' 63.36 .. . r=ligidnrIMI1011 01 , .7::1)1V • 0 •-o' r 'lr--rcel- / f' - ---'.i.! , •Ii. -. ...1 . C. W" 1... ::.r.r.eidinavra'a.:x.r$3 , II TT1 ' ,r, • • , .c::1 ,..:_..• ir-, . •. .. . ..±....._, ......4 • . •. ... (.1% tr it. 9 P V 1 cy I ‘11., 4.24$ et ) %-• ••••• .4 4A 9TH residenc '• ••• -f• 1 ..• ram lErti -.RAI ' • N-4° ralalc6npini wim. .sa II sUll JS • I n , , • !is........ %.*:... • \, --k . ; lb..„4, 234 1:7 residence 33 "a 1-11 a apartment. iR_3 ...:: [ 4 d S ;' ..;,.: s till'" "• if. ill. Ci ,. ..,.. ,...„ . ... . z. c. LA 40_ 32 r4gisicami., : 1 resIdeno ---7(•• 4 • 8411 •..0.. . (?‘ 4 C3 ,9,Eli .,.•'. - 9O2 [04rs1 7 •••• . apartmainA ._ _..,,____ ...._..-i , - Pl.•82 , vacant lend r•s di -lel J. .9 $.6 e "• 20 19 18 11 t /resident:6,N l . 2-1 r. .•. •• . 1 "P -IpA -.4. ,.-f 1 a op . -- 4 r• •• '.*. r- .. ko N; cg.cg: oo . _ -- -0 L5c.c.., -"), .'co (-1 1 • 1?El`,...‘, .. • .; Ilti tt Mil a]- f T,7,;" . ..... .... •- C6 I IC I' a \ ‘91•• %• ••\ ,_.:47). a sc " • - _it hind' rf:.,J. 8' • .?, ...::. . riN ..„,._ . vacant lars. 6 I"'' Si z, .,6' ts, Kite . - •• • , •, t.- N.E.1> . • • • • . 11-1 , ..•I .., •?" C- 7.:1 >1.3 7,9 ad 1 "f 70 13 sic A I o• .s...... ....‹. ... ... ••• •. '• • •. .• •. .'. 'DO :residence i 86& . ,`\b, 'I- ck.LT r'.L.,31 41 cy ' ci ,_ _ :.,-. •= .g..----tc=-. 4!" *--/ r': Eli 77 k. ip-,„..5.,c • •, , % , • s• • 4 5 6 re. Lfr-111'- .. z .i/9 4! MO %CO A.•-7s .#12T- I , ' 8 : -) '••1 c ...• ..c I'24 III r2" 21 s ‘::) 1.- rfins e^ a. -FIN- . z residence 0 .N.. ali 1: ' ,;„1654)4^;)/.:. ••:.VIc> I'l -4.4 "n n 0:-J Luk 1 , ,1, 8 not , .. ....... .:.: ''...:: .•:....... • cant land in ,, a_i..14. or,1 i ii• . go • •S' in "Z. • • •.. . .. 17-20 '19A74.17 10 V 1133 1 .10'12:2 4' 8T H rasidpnesi •• •.. raNisidence Er • • •:. •: ''''.1-0,' r_8PL,lif.443"". n " •' reside.971366,C1 tiji . ral,i.d.Inpi m-1_1_ 0 --A - et]t.,- ,- , I-2,1 1 774-z- ffr..117---"s -1350,PitilR, id .•1 repent land 4 / v I. . r) ti . • "-.1 1 , .,. • - is ,, Z• rf'N 4/-1••*: •: - - •: .:, 0 - •-,,. ..---2---Tt 1 k,';? g2 :-... 1-go z , •:4` 6 illl „- -4 ail -i°"p , ••7 ••. ••• • . •. ... -t. cent imnp / ;... ' trsti IN 4.r--,- • ___ .. ... . c.. , • /6-1 75 ^ ,j,...: htl 01 ...' kJ reeldenole1 " 4.1 • ' 177 36--I4 21.4 'Ii•I .• , • ... .., " -0 -7 :5. .. ., 1:. business,.. f' 161-5 go id .b!.. F.. AV.://^ rsiesIdinolmf ' C-) . l': rgl • .. 8 ri, . .. • • .. -z. , 1 _CIL*,.• . 2 ., • . .. : -s :z t...5• s •• ••• /Jj134J-L., , . ,. . cEi . , .0 r-N ikilli-...w • •R --, . 8TH . • ST. • - ••. •.. .. ...•••• .. ... .... 73 1 i • • 4 ••• .;4 ‘4, :: ..ar. • 107'191 ..• . ,, ,...... i I-•-•' ---- ••/-: • c. -'" ' ;11 .., . . .. 19 j ; . / `11411111Sal.. ,qi c ••':. •••'. 60 us .•: *,•• velum Igind 'z' • • Ji.' e• -. Eftilltisi • 7/.ac ••. •:, , .. ._. resident:sisal • .1 .1. 1 t 6,4 •--"'"-. ' it: "I / . 4 •:, •,*• r • ,`.il-, 240"7, so .„' . •••••• ir ••. . ; 618, (?-' ':" ; ' - ; • '•• • CI ' •.. ..... 0 7 •2a0 . , ts N.6-.rasidencial 1-4111% - 5 si , ..• .. '1 re idsbns-led ziEl. :V.• P., 4 r--is •. 7 rif .10 • • 7 . •P 5 .:Cti 11 44.4 ' .. ' 9 0 Q E,,. . %:::. •.::.:. ....4 70.61 /0•91 •,. . 9. . 21.5 '9. ha) (: Z-1 gr_l , . . ., ...46... ..-... .:::. it;vaaanZtind' ' 6 ; . oil • .. . 8 %., . ... ... : , . .• • '9 • 1, 7k •., ...:',ett .., .. ... ;,..j„..7....s.. r_o_.•16 is : . or.: ram .41911,1 :.1 1.V., 4, L'' • .-.• 44/ 0.•'1, .. 23 . north. -• . • 0 i 7 , ,.. • q•)1'1 . •• •.. .6...42' residenelel .• /71:1 4,1 ,....z. .. .A. • •• •.. . •• ••• rp %.*.• ... ... . to' Tor,..... ., VICIN T % A -- ...., ..... .... ... ••• •.• . , • ., 1 . ... .... '1% ,‘).,... . SCAL = I = - Ll 0 • •• ••• • •• . , 5° 110,i 'SK Si •S 'g 161 ..77 7... ., ...14111,p111C111h...al ' .15... .;, .bekli• .7• ii, . \ k LEGE D . . ..... ••. . ii \ ,.. ,,,..? • • 0 . , a el driVe. un - - fineci edge< ,... .. . ....tt.:.: • 1.%. • , '• J 3.1 t,. r '4•1 . A 18 \ \\dl A,I,•\ry \,•:\ \:7.57 \ \ 41.11.111111411_01.1111M•ift c a n curb qutt •-.r I n " .). •, TRAFFIC ANALYSIS for 60 UNIT SUNSET GARDENS APARTMENT COMPLEX 909-951 Aberdeen Avenue in the CITY OF RENTON for Sunset Gardens Limited Partnership by G. R. (Bob)Parrott,P.E. 1029 Market Street Kirkland, Washington 98033 (206) 828-4266 4 Y INTRODUCTION This report is in response to the City of Renton's request for information regarding the number of trips generated and their impact on existing operating levels of service on adjacent roadways and a newly created intersection, being the site driveway with Aberdeen Avenue, at the location of the proposed Sunset Gardens Apartment Complex. The proposed project involves the construction of a 60 unit apartment complex located on a 2.6 acre site between Interstate 405 and Aberdeen Avenue, just north of the intersection of Aberdeen Avenue and Sunset Boulevard N.E. See vicinity maps, Figures land IA. The prject address is 909 and 951 Aberdeen Avenue N.E. EXISTING CONDITIONS Sunset Boulevard N.E. and Aberdeen Avenue N.E., in the vicinity of the proposed project, are both two lane roadways, with one lane in each direction and with no exclusive turning lanes being provided. Aberdeen Avenue N.E. intersects Sunset Boulevard N.E. at an extreme acute angle; however, the City of Renton has recently realigned the approach to be closer to 90°. Sunset Boulevard N.E. is a through street while Aberdeen Avenue N.E. is controlled by a stop sign. N.E. Park Drive is a four- lane facility with two lanes each way, plus turning lanes at its signalized intersections with I-405 ramps and with N.E. Sunset Boulevard. The proposed project site has been recently rezoned from single family residential to multi-family residential. Existing traffic volumes for Sunset Boulevard N.E. and Aberdeen Avenue N.E., for 1988, were obtained from the City of Renton. Additional A.M. and P.M. peak hour approach and turning volumes were obtained by the project proponent in early December 1988, and again in January 1990. Peak hour approach and turning movement volumes were also obtained for I-405 on and off ramps at N.E. Park Drive and N.E. Sunset Boulevard, and the intersection of N.E. Park Drive and N.E. Sunset Boulevard during January 1990. These existing traffic volumes are depicted in Figure 2. SITE GENERATED TRAFFIC VOLUMES/DISTRIBUTION/ASSIGNMENT The Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Manual includes trip generation rates for land use Code 220, which is specifically for apartment. complexes. A copy of these generation rates is attached hereinafter in the appendix. The anticipated site generated traffic volumes for an average weekday and the A.M. and P.M. peak hours, in-bound and out-bound, are depicted as follows in Table 1. TABLE 1 Site Generated Traffic (60 Units) Time Rate/D.U. Volume AWDT 6.1 366 AM Pk Hr In 0.1 6 AM Pk Hr Out 0.4 24 PM Pk Hr In 0.4 24 PM Pk Hr Out 0.2 12 Saturday 6.3 37$ Sunday 5.6 336 It should be pointed out that no adjustments have been made to ITE trip generation rates which would reflect a possible favorable impact due to the existence of transit service in the area and the possible implementation of other transportation system management concepts. Project generated A.M. and P.M. peak hour trips were distributed and assigned to the adjacent roadway network in accordance with PSCOG's home-based, work-oriented trip model, and as indicated in Figures 3 and 4. Some traffic engineering judgment was exercised in manually adjusting the assignment of the anticipated site generated trips. The assignments were based largely upon the aforementioned trip model, and observation of existing travel patterns and turning,movements at the subject intersections, as well as the locations of large employment and market attractions in the area and the location of points of access to northbound and southbound Interstate 405. Based on the above factors, we anticipate the majority of all site related traffic will be oriented to and from the south via Aberdeen Avenue N.E. and Sunset Boulevard N.E. A traffic volume growth rate of 2.2% per year has been predicted for the Renton/Newcastle area from year 1990 to year 2000. However, volume growth rates on I-405 ramps vary from 4.6% to 5.1% per year, and we therefore have assumed a. growth rate of 4.9% from existing 1990 volumes to horizon year 19.91 post- development. LEVEL OF SERVICE Anticipated approach and turning movement volumes on Aberdeen Avenue N.E. at the proposed project entryway, and at the intersections of N.E. Sunset Boulevard and Aberdeen Avenue N.E., N.E. Sunset Boulevard and N.E. Park Drive, and I-405 ramp at N.E. Park Drive and N.E. Sunset Boulevard, for the A.M. and P.M. peak hours, for post-development conditions are depicted in Figures 5 and 6. Level of Service calculations were performed using the Cap-Calc computer program authored by Roger Creighton and Associates, and as licensed to Christopher V. Brown and Associates. Level of Service calculations for the A.M. and P.M. peak hour periods for both existing 1990 and post-development conditions were performed for the referenced locations and are depicted as follows in Table 2. TABLE 2 Overall Levels of Service Pre-Development Post-Development Intersection 1990 1991/with Project A.M. Peak P.M. Peak A.M. Peak P.M. Peak 1. N.E. Park Drive and I-405 SB ramps 2. N.E. Park Drive and I-405 NB ramps 3. N.E. Park Drive and B B B B N.E. Sunset Boulevard 4. N.E. Sunset Boulevard A B A C and Aberdeen Avenue N.E. 5. N.E. Sunset Boulevard B C B D and 1-405 ramps 6. Aberdeen Avenue N.E. Non-existant A A and Project Driveway The results of the level of service analysis indicate that all approachs and turning movements at the subject intersections currently operate at acceptable Levels of Service during both peak hours, this being a pre-development condition. The analysis further reveals that all approach and turning movement operations to the subject intersections and the intersection of the proposed site entryway and Aberdeen Avenue N.E., with the exception of one approach, will continue to operate at acceptable Levels of Service after development of the proposed project. Complete details of the analysis are contained in the computer printouts attached as Appendix A. ACCIDENTS In the past, a number of accident occurrences at the intersection of Sunset Boulevard N.E. and Aberdeen Avenue became significant enough to warrant the attention of the City of Renton Traffic Engineering Department. For the most part, the accidents were attributed to the acute angle of the approach of Aberdeen Avenue, which resulted in a vehicle operator thereon having to look back over his left shoulder in order to determine if Sunset Boulevard was clear. Grade differences and vegetation contributed to a site distance problem also. This problem appears to have been mitigated recently by the City of Renton, by realignment of the Aberdeen Avenue approach to an angle closer to 90° and at a point approximately 100 feet north of its original point of intersection. The vegetation has been cut back and the new approach conditions now afford vehicle operators a clear field of view. DISCUSSION The proposed project entryway would be located on Aberdeen Avenue N.E., relatively close to the intersection with N.E. Sunset Boulevard (approximately 100'), however, still being as far away as possible and still being on the subject site. During the A.M. peak hour, some delay may be experienced by site traffic attempting to access Aberdeen Avenue N.E. which is not evident in the LOS calcs since the intersections are treated as isolated locations. This would be a result of minor queuing at the stop sign on Aberdeen Avenue N.E. However, the duration would be short and would affect only a small percentage of the total volume during the peak hour. Similarly, minor delays might be.experienced by northbound vehicles turning left into the sight. According to the LOS calcs, Level A is maintained, but the concern would be the potential backing up of traffic on Aberdeen to N.E. Sunset Boulevard. The provision of a left turn refuge lane at the entryway would mitigate the problem, if warranted. It also has been suggested that if necessary, a right "turn only restriction in and out of the site be considered, however, northbound vehicles would then seek out a U-turn location and thus relocate any potential problem to a location north of the proposed site. There has been concern voiced relative to development of additional multi-family complexes on the west side of Aberdeen Avenue N.E. between the subject.site and N.E. Park Drive. Development to maximum R-3 potential would yield 270 units, including the subject 60 units. LOS calcs for such a condition yield Level A for all movements, except a lower Level B for southbound right turns onto Sunset Boulevard N.E. from Aberdeen Avenue N.E. during the A.M./P.M. peak hour only. At the time of this writing, the staff of the City of Renton Traffic Engineering Department was unaware of any concerns or problems at Sunset Boulevard N.E. and the I-405 ramps, north and south of the site, however, the proponent was requested to analyze these locations, the results of which are depicted in Table 2. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS In summary, we believe that based on observation and the results obtained in the level of service calculation that the anticipated trips generated by the proposed project will have no significant impact on the operating levels of service during either peak hour or at any time during the day at the subject intersections. There appear to be no mitigating measures warranted at any of the subject intersections at this time as a result of the construction of the proposed project; however, conditions should be monitored to assure that no backups are occurring as a result of northbound vehicles waiting to turn left into the site from Aberdeen Avenue N.E. , . , . ' . . • 9 . 1 . . • ,__„_,E10.4___;_r LA___;(47.clf: .•-• ,.:i51it 1 iinStliPt. TMALC84147 A II t4',.!i...:‘:,'.1 MR 05 ti . Piu: :):1164 C.7:1•Pt t...5D. TE EACH PARK ,...... STrg a -- ••... _,. .w , _, me mum >191 i I"1 i TIE II ----./.6. 'i .. 46 v la z ,,,t W ii NE 12t1 ''''. T /.... ..!-..4.:f::::.::'.::::•.,..:: ,,.. 4 z z NE 21 i 111 ''-x IS 'T IRA'S .18 NE 12TH i •L • - til E rc rtilit on..: wi .,t y F. if •s ; ,.1" c••• V -'s 14. - . 1 . at , . •. I - 1(/ lif fir*10TH IF flOr tri0 AC/ 6-.. , Z V I or *.• A ^ BOAT / I ." ' to Ill Q., 10101H, I 49 ,, rr 3,4 tu 01 n NE i , LAUNCH \ stz , 4 2 cf q / g \ % 6'4 NE 10TH 1ST ' 9711 Av s , 130E1"C ED IF ' EU Sr---. 1. .% .. ' RENTON f z ‘ c) 1 -I . 7, .s. it n .:..., -_..___...PLANT__ - 7.-Iif-__ - 7....g .7!-- \ • 1 1 NE otti P •,,,,•- - . . •Il . ..1.z g - G • - -- -.1. Eli if--,L. : 11. 46e., .6 4' 11E .01% 't 1 . r- , 1, z zELITHPL > • • is Ot• *V :. z < z. 4 • ra?‘..9')j- ti 911t 1 . 9 cv : 41J. Ir44 A .- rs i ow oci 0. • •• c iii H Rill 0! N BIN Si ' •?..E0 E littit a > NE w 111-- lig•• . • .. r:1 • E SP 6/HE 10 ,..,,Z.-.11E 7TH :: "6• 1/17 F53; E wit,4 .;, . ;I' '-', A f; ,1. ..„. . ----i: \-,',....:..,....:',,i I uoTNErts • Al T ; .. I ,reto I •,- z i4 ke I,1". .i ..;..NE 7111! 7. 1 .1..• I 1-1T-6-TAij s• Vigkriti1/4 e. z 6TH I ..% "`t S'g.., tu. r, • ,s. ot tit u.to i NF Ijd .1 13 ;• Z' 0 • -' ,si s. 7: ?,C. ) •L• f ---j,z•Nt%E II,. :i. LI; 2 4 4: en on .. ‘1, 7 , 1 , e t 11 • g 7, 1" 7 .RENT,IIN 1.1. L,t I 1 1 > - 1 44) .tu iv,.-4 a 5111.1 ....4 1.)111 ,, • . ' . e t4 iji .I!: \ \ \ n , \R , .TIT-to Slo•-• I - ---,6J- N 111 -b . . •tf ..4 '‘itt40136t t E 1 lin . 4 . . . ,._,.6 E;1' ! . ikr.....7• Air_porl, .:. 7, ---T-Ci--,..;11_ mr.iTti 2i.sT.. _____ ___. _• - Il.1'14. 41 . isIE:. ii'le . ,,i -ND .... 17-----7-1- - 1 En i 1 ----1 X '.1' ' .• . 1 . -':• .. Z ?,t1 , 11. x! U >,le,' MARION it' s i I -•• - I LREL_rc _sT z ___ _ ,, / WINDSOR HILLS "..• \ 0-1u 1=1.A,_I-I 4 2 rAnkl . 6xtrtil . 74 st : j 51 . cli. •i 1 N w ,..., o N EC ca 5, 1.1 BR KS • m ';•.AIRPOFiT • .wi••; •• 4 7,5--,- lf .1 -4 11 gr . • - .....• p;•;•••" )•• 2ND a.. ST 0 14 IA. t 4 t • IA- 1 • . • i • tr.",, ..,,s-------- . > IIE1/2, ,f.‘!, .,/,..,4 .?.., Z. (?- -- 1 . . . i . •.•.'" > - - '- 119` S . .1‘. • / ' 6" 4 . 11 I t.„kr.qx. •41‘,...t,'''''..‘:41- i \,,..1 0 ivtr , 1,11"t •4 0 .4 .!••t• sy_.:i1"0-C7 ' - 1g, 0 E - itEMPTERY I ARENtot) It .•-,0........ii •,. 113.1 N-v,,t,,,,.) Ng w \ -c s<I> ....", tin.„z„.,-•,/ 405 1,:, > S I nij •2ND --A, T ..= V•14,•>," 169 w I " ,,,..•ti,•Ip .1.--.,. -.- Lt•-•-••-••-4,, .• •. 4 - -. " C I-0 A I1 RIV E R i. . ,er --,---.- S3RD.N -rx •,. - -- - -ST 4 •,- -,- - --, PL /NvN>c›C•S ...1 4 "4 . ..,:,..,,,, q, 1 fi. 0`,•- V.4 0 IC.N/WC/ u 5_,I1H T.,,,,:-As: nTj ss -, >1 ,•„, . 00 ' 110,1:11VR lt,-1"..- .3:- "4: 4'4.• • 4c. •st Z • 0-04' . 44- 60 j."' 4 7.4. •i/NA,' 5.-f;1•4;-1 • , 4'11' 9t-,,,,o0"ks 5111 3sr ro - .4 . v , 4 .xs • - L it ' f,)\ • N. ••41, , - 1:-. tZ E j ,,.1- 1., %46114 tl ' e* ' . . ..)"' • b s W 6TH W Ill 4 ., rr. •-''' 4 --R -P -- ."1 > T1i St : A. i 4 S 6 6 A „ tP Cr s71H 1 et c.ct -I T S • 71H o .• 44 - - , It-3,,...:-.. IL;11 X < fil a In is? , •.j. • a> .• NIcIffEE/P . ii ,_ *0 0_ , of <4 I 619,139'1 (it° /0 •'•.• ' AnNnLo- I -..r, t 91/1 :•.•", ••• rAnk I ..,\04. I . •• AV . . , . • . . • V/e/N/TY A7AP • /---/4-atee-- / . . . . . ,. . . ., -,.... --1- 4"' 17. e ,:. . i4.1.-n, L ...v:.,z.:. ,0•4••ill 5 7'2.1 1.40 4.2::,=_...z".4.A.0..7.!..--.•4_1_15..=f 2.-. 1 _ til t-•- 4 - 1(12.1j ' i soistf ' ti /a - ti r w- , 0 / 7.---i--0 . ___ ____________ ,........ tr "Fir (.• , . ., E; _, .6 4nc. /91' ("\----0 11;(1-5.:-- 16 ,...--_,-.-.,„.,.,..-..„:-_,...., • a. ry.,..!;i. ,i IIZ f!? r-----•`- ------ -- `O "7'. I •Fill t, ...... .... . --#:---------IL 1 N E. 101.11 04 Ct. .1/, .I.S0 - .L. //5 ' --• IMO- `..1-747i7 -711:1 r ti..) 4.2 _10 44 Ac. 0 olio 1_. 1,th.. . LIR,' °' .'„=, . ..; V 17 15 Ruir, " •,I,Y.h 1 .._...81___-• , n, •••1' Q iolo •••• 1111 .; ___________ it • - N _ ii_..- -• .- 00 N st;;1"t J771 I i0 Ac 13:IT lint -1w/----- 3:-ILI& ' 41 -----.....-..-. - 1 r.i.,07 14 g - q . ..2‘.1 4.1 ...-......-....- -771.3' /09.94_0.7/.47 ._. _______,__• ._.. .._ _..., 7,1.130 I'1.01 _ p 7.7 /7s . R I ,/,0.35 A 1 I Ell .1,1461 0.33 Ac.,, F.: 9,,T'r _ fo9.94 160 ._ TS . • .-.. -..01 ,--, • • -6-r-ii: ... ------ .--.‘ 1 962 :15.c JIT CI', t.2] , ,,, 11 ,•: A 5 . i I•-•Fir5-11-- 11:1 , : 4? 311• 246.0.. ' ." ' " ••• v --- .7 1 1°1'40 ' r . ii.;) trl ti.1 lel i; r... PRo..TEGr 7:- l'.- nirE N i.” 6 7 tgil 9 I° " a 4 . ,D 4) ...A Sys 00 26iiis 'e c f IA 0 0 0 - N1.3ij 0 60 1-57 . r ._ ___ .13-- .--7.---- •--.--- - - 3;1.1 10 U 03 7-1.01 3 6 • 1,[1. 7 r.101 r• C. -...:. ' , •_. ---, „-,_----- f",` L0161 re.tr k; g 4- j-i,.•• 0 (I tll . • 9 ' (4M I ----1 . 9 !?441 ' /a q. , 91.• l,• -..,Po ••,-A ------Fiz 73 E4,1 ,::'.:L1:.., 54 i-1: ;it.e-1:::: r.„1-ttri -tit- , •. . .. ... --A . 53Z 26 i 5 :, tb e i.t.pl;! f-1. .f - , 1.4r745 tti 111 :::....;: 8 oi U15 ; • • c:. 0.90 AC. 7^.- ? 4 - 4 • S '..... - -Z. . ...5-. 495-'2 ..1 1. Lt 7 118 i ..1!...Jill_ '0•tz (-16- - (fl Z - • ::, .. cli ,,,,-: kni Do4r, , , 1:-.33 -7-- 77-- '.. •:. •- 2 82 . 1-4"(• -, 'i9 22 20 .... .... , 0;r7 - -7---- - -7'.. ' A, fit. -.. 0• • , 127T1 '. 21.4 ' r'.' - t- I/ ti - I FA' ':. "IjLt)' 't.: --r '7V. L:1 ,.....0 , r?.so" . 1,-, , -9e• •c , * r Pi v3-..:. .'... - ev c - 4 0 .... •.': -• z. a .1.3c.ci; t-... ' c-• ''', 446'6 -C ;., I ,,• e,...• •.: .... trl -4,.. 6 4 .,: : •... ...• 41), N.E. .•. ..• til . •• s: . .....- . .. . .. . cn , , • .. -70 3739 0.7 , ., L2f•Al. - 13 .... .'• • , . -• •••• -- -Ja q,ki tale-I:11r -1 12 0,1 Pi-Iyir ,. . .... ,' . •v) ittit --4,e.t:1& 4, 11A.. ° V-1., ..10 1.,,‘J Er W L'il riii) .":-..:.. .... . • e•- - so il , -1- , vil 5 ' .7:i -,... :29 ...'4 pisTri . ,.• •-_-.1•Ty6" -;,),1_5.4,___I _ • 1 in _ • .'D- (III'S] ) T) 2. 1212, . , ;••• -„• ..... II _ .L-7; 7-7 -- . -z • .7/9 42 , •••••3 r` • 9 9 . ; •'8.1'N'tt;c:‘iC '•\--:i ,7--.• 21 '--- '-71.--• .. • -. • . CD .,, 1fiiiii -,i-, -. .. - 'S 11:111]; ?," "- , ..., 4 II 153 ! ..iv-i....,4:.../,..."••„.:.e.5. \ikr,-.-4.,, 1-1. , ici... N$, . .i • .: .•: -,.... .,, .z.. -II _. ... .. . . T- . .• . '3%; 10 11; TT 3 1,1•;9N-)/ ,. _ 6 Tti .. . • • •• ...:. %... . - - cl „ , , , if' 1---- -----.-- g - ' - - "T '''.' [I/I 9 id 4-14.TILti 671 N Illi [ill 17-1 1 rft 1 .1 --- • • 3.--rt. ---i i " P..,i' - . --. ---% 111 r . ' • t if:18.,triut• ••• - .,e--•:1'.. ,t ,;, .:...-.I 1...71,:-.”,0 "- 4:4 4:l•F i 5 14 ...,..:.._'7_(c et); 'f .11 • 4--Obriliii :' -7,--- _ - C _ a _ •.. •... ...... ...: .. / . ..1 , 1 a 11 • ; -.. ••• •.•• .•• -. (7-1 ... o ti ,„•.. t-Tig •---__. --.,'f• 6'; • ,: .4 •f.1. • ' 2 ----,A. 6. G 2 :, 1 en j? z 0-- ..214, .v.-...• • • .:__„--.-- Ill '1 - „•1c . 71.0 ,.... ..,17;1. , - -t. At E " ' L';;,--' • k ,' •. .. . ID .2 2 7 112-"i•-72,- .t,(411.1];• LU ill 1-1-17-. - • . 8 rt, - . .... .. ... • - T, , I I 3 ._ ,___."_ Q l:- (817.17.--k '. -'",,,a- . .. • . . .. Z. ; If `• . :., .. r, 77.1-1 [I: .,. . ... :; , ] , ".I€7/1, 0-,...z.-7. 5 1_71.: lij .11 .I.A.61:71•• .i'. i,...0,,I -C /23 41 !:i:•-•---1 'P ii -..,-"‘. ti•-, (I-) ri.174:° r--,--;---_,---7-.._-...'2-? -c`r•-ir • f' 1-.' l'fr--- .... .... -. I " ',.. • el_ ... ... .LC.r- v ,i-r : •....f .71.4,m' 1" -...., 27.7.-_.„4-• t 1. i)... . sr - . ...,, ..... • ..1 1 , ..,,..," .1.14...itif„. • - 60 .. .. v, ? • e,r.:_tm,„,-cv t irvii,r,„ ! • .t -• • ' --t.' 1 •--' fkl.4, ... :c.r- ,. .:. ..... • • t- 418 _.%\.' 474 ; 31E1' :. 56 ...e -Ti---7, . N.E. -- -- 7,--L .A...: •.. n . ---.. tr.!-!: 9-. .!.._.,e i___-_' lint 1', Ir "-.JP'3r-7 . -. ..._. '. •.,:. ....• o .. !. vl. i Z 3 . 41• ..f 1' iRs4 •/: i;tp..,.. -Ix i ild N , 4_211: _7' _IL_ "5 . - " al ' Z ', '`,,i'-: 1... t 4/ P---:) CI 777- -3,-• f. .• • i 3.7.i ii, .___.(0.11.1-7: --4,. •• s • • '• O• f; 7J k2./ (,,,717---7-. • 1 _1;c. '5'11 1 ' fl ) '? ! -•,-1 .... ...-. • .. V/C-/N/7Y AMP • 1 16 . . .., .1 --g ( 1) • Al i •if . ' • • • •• .4 .AV r•,... r,, is.) • 23 Vt. - - , [pie/ I 17 • ••-- 1• ••. •.• ... .• .s.(..: --'-'--..1.2 • i' ...I r.IT.) 21 i • • •• 'I-- ' P -.4."- ‘..-.0.../ -• • /-•--/ /iC /A N - '7711,7r.t.; 6 7 " . ... . 0 illb•. - . - - tg---1,0-77,1-1---7,1-1„„"vs irir. N\ n Ars. , • - 549 X 405 new R•MP • //83 -4--- /o4a 97� 5 -4---- 345 go I) Zia ,F---,341 NE•, PAr?k Dig D . . �� /B5 loat9s /fo ____b /o—c7), 11 /6- 70 Z5 118 N81105 o RA4P 41 W sgr-45 1 i vi O OAJ RAMP vl q 9� 221 tero 360 ,V,e I--4e5 OFF RAMP iwcA.TEGT 0 IT Sires 0__ Z �y ls� j ---7;1 220 'ell/ I� NV® Z"-4o5 ON RAMP 57e t50 /--i41/r?E Z E.xisT/Aiq /9gro An. Pit H' \k22-___. „TRAPFi 0 (/OGUM E 5 .,,,g--- 7/5- /55 /7/ - * • SB14o5 , aFFR.,yp ki N34� - 348 . f' 8 6 Zo #-- 12 o NE• (19Al2,k D . /55 sea 84a 1153+ /320 0 Zee LII 49 L NB.Y405 D RAiti P 1� i . . ofW sa r-44,o5 Q ant Raap h 305 /03 /52 2i5 • OFF RA/4 p ,Wc*T GT 0 O 4.. /00 A . ,- . ilia I-¢o5 Doi/ RAMP 3)O / /52,7 . A74 Je& ZA fix/.577 /4 /qqo PM. Pt Nye. 7-RAF/r"/G 10 Lu,MES 474 -->- 522, SB X-405ei--. , Grfire RA,4,7p • 00 4_0 �-- 0 _ 0 1 -•E-- 0 ___,. 00 __, oy 0 ----I, 1 ____ 1 7 1 ro- . 0 _____T --.), ,F--- I Ae .) (PARt 00,e. r--- NJ.t 4c6 OAKP.A.M P h zifoos / a K N 41 / fit- O / / N.0 T-4o5 Of-A-RA/tip P?oTeGT 5 S/TLC 4- O inN o1 -71 ' 5 20 O NB x-Qo5 On/ RAM p 20 5 ISITE cei✓Ee_Ari.> Aw. P,C N& 19 _________)o oZ /1 ..„- ' -------r?(\ S'14//77O/1 ')/..'-tyc?. - rW.Yd eiYa' Q.�.t b f1'9S7 94/5 -fr 3a•/7,/..v' oZ in d wya' /vo 5afr-I 9N 0 1‘,0° r// Ai°. 1 L. 31/S �Z I2 1'7�tblid d 1v'2/ _Y,47 saPI EvN t /I/ Z 117 . 9 k4 dwd� N� t £ � '�1 SOS`-Ies • 21/44 h d L✓`va' 0 0 0 0 0 Sok;I6%N 0 • jL- L <---- 0 F�- 1 .s.e---- O •aty 'e,l1(•?N 0 -.1 , 0----- 0 __in r ______,s• _____)_ ,, ---- 0 -$ -, dkvvy...47,0 , , 506 X 9s • 5B X-4o5 ' ' of,- R•Mp au 1 37 i 1241 io94 c 3cZ' �-273 ,F-- 3 s N6, ,P.a2K O - �- ---) -ci r. /57 /9¢ , /05 1 Z9q N.e1=405 O RA47 P N hi il h 513 I-4e5 Q anJ RAMP v C M / 1/1 N N9 Z--4,os aer RAMP P?at.rEGr J 5 +4Z 4� "\ri I S�r� �/ 21 45i fTh Any 40 NB 1-405 On/ RAMPel / 74-L/ieE S ,c'osr vE✓E_LoPM T /99/ An PKbire TRAFiiYG V4G UMgS \h„--/4- 741 SB 1=405 ' ` OFFR•MP t Z 3 3 ill t— 365 __ 36,5 ,,,�—_—_ 4e 3 .1 c,,r-7Z4.... ,e.--, zco ,v .. PArer az. ; iF .--lG3 936. -- aea e.,o 1385 2. 99 218 )' Co 0 514 ,v .2=4o5 a .eA417 P W 2 � SB T-�4p5 1 3 Q and RA iP h v ti , Orli 14 / / . ivy T 4,os 2, /59 O, /'ANi,o P?aTEGT S/Ta . Y1 -) 1 L .111V 3. //6 P I,��. 74,11) I NB 5-4�5 oil/ RAMPt 1. e,f E'E 6 POST DE1/&(,.c5PMkn/T /991 &V fi<IA' ,e. F/G VOLUMLS \k± J___ .E 414 r 417 )4 574 APPENDIX 1/17/1990 CHRISTOPHER BROWN INTERSECTION RENTO1A • N W -+- E SB TOTAL SB I-405 OFF RAMP A 0 . 236 N/S STREET I I WB TOTAL 1183 1443 <I . 1> < 201• 35 . I 260 v 0 'v 1 1 ` I N.E. PARK DRIVE E/W STREET <* v *> <--- 2 *--- 1 v \/ 3 --*> v N.E. PARK DRIVE E/W STREET • 0 A I 0 ^ ' 0 I 0 EB TOTAL I I '268 150 I I > SB I-405 ON RAMP N/S STREET NB TOTAL 118 0 v CHRISTOPHER BROWN 1/17/1990 SUNSET GARDENS RENTO1A INTERSECTION : N.E. PARK DRIVE @ SB I-405 ON RAMP @ SB I-405 OFF RAMP WEEKDAY A.M. PEAK 1990 CBD?N ACTUATED SIGNAL TRAFFIC & ROADWAY CONDITIONS GRADE HV ADJ. PKG LN. BUSES CONF. PEDS PED BUTTON ARR APP (%) (%) Y/N Nm (Nb) PHF (peds/hr) Y/N SEC TYPE EB 4 1 N 0 0 0.90 0 N 0.0 3 WB -4 1 N 0 0 0. 90 0 N 0. 0 3 NB 0 0 N 0 0 0 . 90 0 N 0. 0 3 SB -2 1 N 0 0 0 . 90 0 N 0.0 3 GEOMETRICS / VOLUMES LANE GROUPS VOLUME 1 2 3 APP LT TH RT MVM LNS WD MVM LNS WD MVM LNS WD EB 0 150 118 TR 3 36. 0 WB 260 1183 0 L 1 12. 0 T 2 24 . 0 NB 0 0 0 SB 35 0 201 L 1 12. 0 TR 1 12 . 0 SIGNAL PHASING APP PHASE 1ST MV 2ND MV 3RD MV PROT PMSV G Y+R EB 2 TR R 42 58 WB 1 L T L 33 67 WB 2 T 42 58 SB 3 L TR LR 25 75 PAGE 1' CHRISTOPHER BROWN 1/17/1990 SUNSET GARDENS RENTOIA INTERSECTION : N.E. PARK DRIVE @ SB I-405 ON RAMP @ SB I-405 OFF RAMP WEEKDAY A.M. PEAK 1990 CBD ? N ACTUATED SIGNAL VOLUME ADJUSTMENT APPROACH LANE GROUP FLOW RATE LANE UTIL ADJ FLOW PROP OF TURNS MVM VOLUME IN GROUP FACTOR RATE LT RT EB TR 268 298 1 . 00 298 0 .00 0.44 WB L 260 289 1 .00 289 1 .00 0. 00 T 1183 1314 1 .00 1314 0.00 0.00 NB SB L 35 39 1.00 39 1 .00 0. 00 TR 201 223 1 . 00 223 0.00 1 .00 SATURATION FLOW IDEAL # OF ADJUSTMENT FACTORS ADJ. APP MVM SAT FLOW LANES WIDTH H.V. GRADE PARK BUS AREA RT LT FLOW ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- EB TR 1800 3 1.00 1. 00 0.98 1 .00 1.00 1.00 0.93 1 .00 4922 WB L 1800 1 1 . 00 1 .00 1 . 02 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 .00 1 .00 0 . 95 1744 T 1800 2 1 . 00 1.00 1 . 02 1 .00 1 .00 1.00 1 . 00 1 .00 3672 NB SB L 1800 1 1 .00 1. 00 1 .01 1.00 1 . 00 1.00 1 . 00 0 . 85 1545 TR 1800 1 1.00 1 . 00 1 .01 1 .00 1 .00 1.00 0. 85 1 .00 1545 PAGE 2 CHRISTOPHER BROWN 1/17/1990 SUNSET GARDENS RENTO1A INTERSECTION : N.E. PARK DRIVE @ SB I-405 ON RAMP @ SB I-405 OFF RAMP WEEKDAY A.M. PEAK 1990 CBD ? N ACTUATED SIGNAL CAPACITY ANALYSIS LN GR ADJ FLOW PMSV ADJ SAT FLOW GREEN LN GR V/C APP MVM RATE LT FLOW FLW RT RATIO CRIT ? RATIO CAPACITY RATIO EB TR 298 0 4922 0.061 N 0 . 420 2067 0 . 144 WB L 289 0 1744 0 .166 N 0 . 330 576 0. 502 T 1314 0 3672 0.358 Y 0 .750 2754 0. 477 NB SB L 39 0 1545 0 . 025 N 0. 250 386 0. 101 TR 223 0 1545 0 .144 Y 0. 250 386 0. 578 CYCLE LENGTH : 100. 0 SUM OF CRITICAL LANES' FLOW RATIOS : 0. 502 LOSS TIME PER CYCLE : 9 INTERSECTION V/C : 0. 552 LEVEL OF SERVICE LN GR V/C GREEN CYC 1st LN GR 2nd LN GR LN GR APP APP APP MVM RATIO RATIO LEN DELAY CAP DELAY PF DELAY LOS DELAY LOS EB TR 0.144 0.420 100 13 . 6 2067 0 .0 0 .85 11 .6 B 11 .5 B WB L 0. 502 0. 330 100 20. 4 576 0.6 1 .00 21 .0 C T 0. 477 0.750 100 3 . 7 2754 0.1 0 .85 3 . 2 A 6 .4 B NB SB L 0 .101 0. 250 100 21 .9 386 0 .0 1.00 21 . 9 C TR 0. 578 0. 250 100 25.0 386 1 .6 0. 85 22 . 6 C 22 .4 C INTERSECTION DELAY : 9. 0 secs/veh LEVEL OF SERVICE : B 1/17/1990 CHRISTOPHER BROWN INTERSECTION RENT02A W -+- E S ' N.E. PARK DRIVE E/W STREET <--- 2 *--- 1 v /\ 2 ---> <* *> I ' N.E. PARK DRIVE .E/W STREET I I 1 1 185 1043 > < EB TOTAL WB .TOTAL 185 - 0 347 1390 NB I-405 OFF RAMP v N/S STREET v 400 100 . <. .> NB TOTAL 500 CHRISTOPHER BROWN 1/17/1990 SUNSET GARDENS RENT02A INTERSECTION s N.E. PARK DRIVE @ NB I-405 OFF RAMP WEEKDAY A.M. PEAK 1990 CBD?N ACTUATED SIGNAL TRAFFIC & ROADWAY CONDITIONS GRADE HV ADJ. PKG LN. BUSES CONF. PEDS PED BUTTON ARR APP (%) (%) Y/N Nm (Nb) PHF (peds/hr) Y/N SEC TYPE --- --- ---- ---- ---- EB 4 1 N 0 0 0.90 0 N 0 .0 3 WB -4 1 N 0 0 0 .90 0 N 0. 0 3 NB -2 1 N 0 0 0.90 0 N 0 .0 3 GEOMETRICS / VOLUMES LANE GROUPS VOLUME 1 2 3 APP LT TH RT MVM LNS WD MVM LNS WD MVM LNS WD EB 0 185 0 T 2 24.0 WB 347 1043 0 L 1 12.0 T 2 24 . 0 NB 400 0 100 L 1 12.0 R 1 12.0 SIGNAL PHASING APP PHASE 1ST MV 2ND MV 3RD MV PROT PMSV G Y+R --- ---- ---- -- --- EB 2 T 19 81 WB 1 L .T L 38 62 WB 2 T 19 81 NB 3 L R LR 43 57 PAGE 1' CHRISTOPHER BROWN 1/17/1990 • SUNSET GARDENS RENTO2A INTERSECTION : N.E. PARK DRIVE @ NB I-405 OFF RAMP WEEKDAY A.M. PEAK. 1990 CBD ? N ACTUATED SIGNAL VOLUME ADJUSTMENT APPROACH LANE GROUP FLOW RATE LANE UTIL ADJ FLOW PROP OF TURNS MVM VOLUME IN GROUP FACTOR RATE LT RT EB T 185 206 1.00 206 0.00 0.00 WB L 347 386 1. 00 386 1 .00 0.00 T 1043 1159 1.00 1159 0 .00 0.00 NB L 400 444 1 .00 444 1 .00 0 . 00 R 100 111 1 .00 111 0.00 1 . 00 SATURATION FLOW IDEAL # OF ADJUSTMENT FACTORS ADJ. APP MVM SAT FLOW LANES WIDTH H.V. GRADE PARK BUS AREA RT LT FLOW ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- EB T 1800 2 1 .00 1.00 0.98 1 .00 1.00 1 .00 1.00 1.00 3528 WB L 1800 1 1.00 1 .00 1 . 02 1 . 00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0 . 95 1744 T 1800 2 1.00 1.00 1 .02 1 .00 1.00 1. 00 1.00 • 1.00 3672 NB L 1800 1 1.00 1.00 1.01 1 .00 1 .00 1 .00 1 .00 0.85 1545 R 1800 1 1 .00 1. 00 1. 01 1 . 00 1.00 1 .00 0 . 85 1.00 1545 PAGE 2 CHRISTOPHER BROWN 1/17/1990 • SUNSET GARDENS RENTO2A INTERSECTION : N.E. PARK DRIVE @ NB 1-405 OFF RAMP WEEKDAY A.M. PEAK 1990 CBD ? N ACTUATED SIGNAL CAPACITY ANALYSIS LN GR ADJ FLOW PMSV ADJ SAT FLOW GREEN LN GR V/C APP MVM RATE LT FLOW FLW RT RATIO CRIT ? RATIO CAPACITY RATIO EB T 206 0 3528 0. 058 N 0 . 190 670 0. 307 WB L 386 0 1744 0. 221 N 0 . 380 663 0.582 T 1159 0 3672 0. 316 Y 0 .570 2093 0.554 NB L 444 0 1545 0. 287 Y 0. 430 664 0. 669 R 111 0 1545 0 . 072 N 0.430 664 0.167 CYCLE LENGTH : 100 .0 SUM OF CRITICAL LANES' FLOW RATIOS : 0. 603 LOSS TIME PER CYCLE : 9 INTERSECTION V/C : 0 .663 LEVEL OF SERVICE LN GR V/C GREEN CYC 1st LN GR 2nd LN GR LN GR APP APP APP MVM RATIO RATIO LEN DELAY CAP DELAY PF DELAY LOS DELAY LOS EB T 0. 307 0.190 100 26 . 5 670 0. 1 0.85 22 .6 C 22 . 4 C WB L 0.582 0. 380 100 18.8 .663 1.0 1.00 19. 8 C T 0.554 0. 570 100 10. 3 2093 0. 3 0.85 9.0 B 11 .7 B NB L 0 . 669 0. 430 100 17 . 3 664 1 . 8 1. 00 19 . 1 C R 0 . 167 0. 430 100 13 . 3 664 0 .0 0. 85 11. 3 B 17. 5 C INTERSECTION DELAY : 14 . 0 secs/veh LEVEL OF SERVICE : B 1/17j1990 CHRISTOPHER BROWN INTERSECTION RENT03A • I W -+- E N.E. PARK DRIVE E/W STREET <--- 2 *--- I v /\ \/ 2 --*> v <* *> I I N.E. PARK DRIVE I I E/W STREET 1 1 285 975 > < EB TOTAL WB TOTAL 300 15 345 1320 SUNSET BOULEVARD v N/S STREET v 70 25 <. .> I I I I NB TOTAL 95 ' CHRISTOPHER BROWN 1/17/1990 SUNSET GARDENS RENT03A INTERSECTION : N.E. PARK DRIVE @ SUNSET BOULEVARD WEEKDAY A.M. PEAK 1990 CBD?N ,ACTUATED SIGNAL TRAFFIC & ROADWAY CONDITIONS GRADE HV ADJ. PKG LN. BUSES CONF. PEDS PED BUTTON ARR APP (%) (%) Y/N Nm (Nb) PHF (peds/hr) Y/N SEC TYPE EB 4 1 N 0 0 0.90 0 N 0.0 3 WB -4 1 N 0 0 0. 90 0 N 0. 0 3 NB -2 1 N 0 0 0. 90 0 N 0 .0 3 GEOMETRICS / VOLUMES LANE GROUPS VOLUME 1 2 3 APP LT TH RT MVM LNS WD MVM LNS WD MVM LNS WD EB 0 285 15 TR 2 24. 0 WB 345 975 0 L 1 12 .0 T 2 24 .0 NB 70 0 25 L 1 12 . 0 R 1 12 .0 SIGNAL PHASING APP PHASE 1ST MV 2ND MV 3RD MV PROT PMSV G Y+R EB 2 TR R 27 73 WB 1 L T L 61 39 WB 2 T 27 73 NB 3 L R LR 12 88 r r 7 PAGE 1 CHRISTOPHER BROWN 1/17/1990 SUNSET GARDENS RENTO3A INTERSECTION : N.E. PARK DRIVE @ SUNSET BOULEVARD WEEKDAY A.M. PEAK 1990 CBD ? N ACTUATED SIGNAL VOLUME ADJUSTMENT APPROACH LANE GROUP FLOW RATE LANE UTIL ADJ FLOW PROP OF TURNS MVM VOLUME IN GROUP FACTOR RATE LT RT EB TR 300 333 1.00 333 0.00 0.05 WB L 345 383 1.00 383 1.00 0.00 T 975 1083 1.00 1083 0.00 0.00 NB L 70 78 1.00 78 1.00 0.00 R 25 28 1.00 28 0.00 1.00 SATURATION FLOW IDEAL # OF ADJUSTMENT FACTORS ADJ. APP MVM SAT FLOW LANES WIDTH H.V. GRADE PARK BUS AREA RT LT FLOW ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- EB TR 1800 ' 2 1 .00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1 .00 1 .00 0.99 1.00 3493 WB L 1800 1 1 .00 1.00 1.02 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1744 T 1800 2 1.00 1 .00 1 .02 1 .00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 3672 NB L 1800 1 1 .00 1 .00 1 . 01 1.00 1 . 00 1.00 1 .00 0.85 1545 R 1800 1 1 .00 1.00 1.01' 1 .00 1.00 1.00 0. 85 1 .00 1545 PAGE 2 CHRISTOPHER BROWN 1/17/1990 SUNSET GARDENS RENTO3A INTERSECTION : N.E. PARK DRIVE @ SUNSET BOULEVARD WEEKDAY A.M. PEAK 1990 CBD ? N ACTUATED SIGNAL CAPACITY ANALYSIS LN GR ADJ FLOW PMSV ADJ SAT FLOW GREEN LN GR V/C APP MVM RATE LT FLOW FLW RT RATIO CRIT ? RATIO CAPACITY RATIO EB TR 333 0 3493 0 .095 Y 0. 270 943 0. 353 WB L 383 0 1744 0 . 220 Y 0. 610 1064 0. 360 T 1083 0 3672 0 . 295 N 0.880 3231 0. 335 NB L 78 0 1545 0.050 Y 0. 120 185 0.422 R 28 0 1545 0. 018 N 0. 120 185 0. 151 CYCLE LENGTH : 100 .0 SUM OF CRITICAL LANES' FLOW RATIOS : 0 . 365 LOSS TIME PER CYCLE : 9 INTERSECTION V/C : 0. 401 LEVEL OF SERVICE LN GR V/C GREEN CYC 1st LN GR 2nd LN GR LN GR APP APP APP MVM RATIO RATIO LEN DELAY CAP DELAY PF DELAY LOS DELAY LOS EB TR 0. 353 0. 270 100 22. 4 943 0. 1 0. 85 19 . 1 C 19 .0 C WB L 0. 360 0. 610 100 7 . 4 1064 0. 1 1. 00 7 .5 B T 0 . 335 0. 880 100 0 . 8 3231 0. 0 0. 85 0. 7 A 2 . 5 A NB L 0. 422 0.120 100 31.0 185 0 . 9 1 .00 31 . 9 D R 0.151 0.120 100 30.0 185 0.0 0. 85 25. 5 D 29 . 9 D INTERSECTION DELAY : 6.9 secs/veh LEVEL OF SERVICE : B CHRISTOPHER BROWN 1/17/1990 SUNSET GARDENS RENT04A INTERSECTION : ABERDEEN AVENUE NE @ NE SUNSET BOULEVARD WEEKDAY A.M. PEAK 1990 CBD?N UNSIGNALIZED - MAJOR STREET RUNS NORTH / SOUTH TRAFFIC & ROADWAY CONDITIONS GRADE HV ADJ. PKG LN. BUSES CONF. PEDS PED BUTTON ARR APP (%) (%) Y/N Nm (Nb) PHF (peds/hr) Y/N SEC TYPE EB -2 1 N 0 0 0.90 0 N 0.0 3 NB 2 1 N 0 0 0. 90 0 N 0.0 3 SB -2 1 N 0 0 0. 90 0 N 0. 0 3 GEOMETRICS / VOLUMES LANE GROUPS VOLUME 1 2 3 APP LT TH RT MVM LNS WD MVM LNS WD MVM LNS WD EB 1 0 220 L 1 12.0 R 1 12 . 0 NB 38 112 0 L 1 12 .0 T 1 12 .0 SB 0 358 2 TR 1 12.0 r I CHRISTOPHER BROWN 1/17/1990 SUNSET GARDENS RENT04A INTERSECTION : ABERDEEN AVENUE NE @ NE SUNSET BOULEVARD WEEKDAY A.M. PEAK 1990 CBD?N UNSIGNALIZED - MAJOR STREET RUNS NORTH / SOUTH UNSIGNALIZED CRITICAL GAPS CRITICAL GAPS (SEC) APP LEFT TURN THROUGH RIGHT TURN EB 6. 30 --- 5. 20 NB 4.70 --- --- SB --- --- --- V O L U M E ALLOCATION TO LAN E S LANE 1 LANE 2 LANE 3 APP L T R L T R L T R EB 1 0 0 0 0 220 0 0 0 NB 38 0 0 0 112 0 0 0 0 SB 0 358 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 UNSIGNALIZED APP LANE 1 LANE 2 LANE 3 EB RESERVE CAPACITY 463 535 --- LEVEL OF SERVICE A A NB RESERVE CAPACITY 782 --- --- LEVEL OF SERVICE A SB RESERVE CAPACITY --- --- --- LEVEL OF SERVICE MAJOR STREET - NB/SB a f CHRISTOPHER BROWN _V 1/17/1990 SUNSET GARDENS RENTO5A INTERSECTION : NE SUNSET BOULEVARD @ NB I-405 ON RAMP WEEKDAY A.M. PEAK 1990 CBD?N UNSIGNALIZED - MAJOR STREET RUNS EAST / WEST TRAFFIC & ROADWAY CONDITIONS GRADE HV ADJ. PKG LN. BUSES CONF. PEDS PED BUTTON ARR APP (%) (%) Y/N Nm (Nb) PHF (peds/hr) Y/N SEC TYPE EB 2 1 N 0 0 0. 90 0 N 0.0 3 WB -2 1 N 0 0 0 . 90 0 N 0.0 3 SB 0 0 N 0 0 0.90 0 N 0.0 3 GEOMETRICS / VOLUMES r LANE GROUPS VOLUME 1 2 3 APP LT TH RT MVM LNS WD MVM LNS WD MVM LNS WD EB 155 171 0 L 1 12:0 T 1 12.0 WB 0 715 12 T 2 24.0 R 1 12 .0 SB 0 0 0 CHRISTOPHER BROWN 1/17/1990 SUNSET GARDENS RENT05A INTERSECTION : NE SUNSET BOULEVARD @ NB I-405 ON RAMP WEEKDAY A.M. PEAK 1990 CBD?N UNSIGNALIZED - MAJOR STREET RUNS EAST / WEST UNSIGNALIZED CRITICAL GAPS CRITICAL GAPS (SEC) APP LEFT TURN THROUGH RIGHT TURN EB 4. 70 --- --- WB --- --- --- SB 6. 30 --- 5. 20 VOLUME ALLOCATION TO LANES LANE 1 LANE 2 LANE 3 APP L T R L T R L T R EB 155 0 0 0 171 0 0 0 0 WB 0 357 0 0 358 0 0 0 12 SB 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 UNSIGNALIZED APP LANE 1 LANE 2 LANE 3 EB RESERVE CAPACITY 362 --- --- LEVEL OF SERVICE B WB RESERVE CAPACITY --- --- --- LEVEL OF SERVICE SB RESERVE CAPACITY --- --- --- LEVEL OF SERVICE MAJOR STREET - EB/WB 1/17/1990 CHRISTOPHER BROWN INTERSECTION RENT01P • N • W -+- E SB TOTAL SB I-405 OFF RAMP ^ 0 384 N/S STREET ' II I WB TOTAL I 348 468 <' ' %> < 222 i 162 120 V 0 1 ' 1 I N.E. PARK DRIVE E/W STREET <* I V *> <--- 2 *--- 1 V /\ V \/ 3 --*> • v N.E. PARK DRIVE E/W STREET 0 A 0 ^ 0 i p ' I <. .> EB TOTAL ' , I . 1384 892 1 > SB I-405 ON RAMP N/S STREET NB TOTAL 492 0 V CHRISTOPHER BROWN 1/17/1990 SUNSET GARDENS RENTO1P INTERSECTION : N.E. PARK DRIVE @ SB I-405 ON RAMP @ SB I-405 OFF RAMP WEEKDAY P.M. PEAK 1990 CBD?N ACTUATED SIGNAL TRAFFIC & ROADWAY CONDITIONS GRADE HV ADJ. PKG LN. BUSES CONF. PEDS PED BUTTON ARR APP (%) (%) Y/N Nm (Nb) PHF (peds/hr) Y/N SEC TYPE EB 4 1 N 0 0 0. 90 0 N 0. 0 3 WB -4 1 N 0 0 0 .90 0 N 0.0 3 NB 0 0 N 0 0 0 .90 0 N 0 .0 3 SB -2 1 N 0 0 0 . 90 0 N 0. 0 3 GEOMETRICS / VOLUMES LANE GROUPS VOLUME 1 2 3 APP LT TH RT MVM LNS WD MVM LNS WD MVM LNS WD EB 0 892 492 TR 3 36 .0 WB 120 348 0 L 1 12 .0 T 2 24 .0 NB 0 0 0 SB 162 0 222 L 1 12 . 0 TR 1 12 . 0 SIGNAL PHASING APP PHASE 1ST MV 2ND MV 3RD MV PROT PMSV G Y+R EB 2 TR R 57 43 WB 1 L T L 15 85 WB 2 T 57 43 SB 3 L TR LR 28 72 PAGE 1' CHRISTOPHER BROWN 1/17/1990 SUNSET GARDENS RENTO1P INTERSECTION : N.E. PARK DRIVE @ SB I-405 ON RAMP @ SB I-405 OFF RAMP WEEKDAY P.M. PEAK 1990 CBD ? N ACTUATED SIGNAL VOLUME ADJUSTMENT APPROACH LANE GROUP FLOW RATE LANE UTIL ADJ FLOW PROP OF TURNS MVM VOLUME IN GROUP FACTOR RATE LT RT EB TR 1384 1538 1 .00 1538 0.00 0. 36 WB L 120 133 1. 00 133 1.00 0. 00 T 348 387 1 . 00 387 0.00 0.00 NB SB L 162 180 1.00 180 1 .00 0.00 TR 222 247 1 .00 247 0.00 1 .00 SATURATION FLOW IDEAL # OF ADJUSTMENT FACTORS ADJ. APP MVM SAT FLOW LANES WIDTH H.V. GRADE PARK BUS AREA RT LT FLOW ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- EB TR 1800 3 1 .00 1 .00 0. 98 1 . 00 1.00 1 .00 0.95 1 .00 5027 WB L 1800 1 1 .00 1.00 1 .02 1 . 00 1.00 1 . 00 1 .00 0. 95 1744 T 1800 2 1 .00 1. 00 1 . 02 1 .00 1. 00 1.00 1 .00 1.00 3672 NB SB L 1800 1 1 . 00 1 .00 1 . 01 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 0.85 1545 TR 1800 1 1 .00 1 . 00 1. 01 1 .00 1 .00 1 . 00 0 . 85 1.00 1545 PAGE 2 CHRISTOPHER BROWN 1/17/1990 SUNSET GARDENS RENTO1P INTERSECTION : N.E. PARK DRIVE @ SB I-405 ON RAMP @ SB I-405 OFF RAMP WEEKDAY P.M. PEAK 1990 CBD ? N ACTUATED SIGNAL CAPACITY ANALYSIS LN GR ADJ FLOW PMSV ADJ SAT FLOW GREEN LN GR V/C APP MVM RATE LT FLOW FLW RT RATIO CRIT ? RATIO CAPACITY RATIO EB TR 1538 0 5027 0.306 Y 0 . 570 2865 0 . 537 WB L 133 0 1744 0.076 Y 0 . 150 262 0. 508 T 387 0 3672 0.105 N 0 .720 2644 0.146 NB SB L 180 0 1545 0.117 N 0. 280 433 0. 416 TR 247 0 1545 0.160 Y 0 . 280 433 0 .570 CYCLE LENGTH : 100 .0 SUM OF CRITICAL LANES' FLOW RATIOS : 0.542 LOSS TIME PER CYCLE : 9 INTERSECTION V/C : 0 .596 LEVEL OF SERVICE LN GR V/C GREEN CYC 1st LN GR 2nd LN GR LN GR APP APP APP MVM RATIO RATIO LEN DELAY CAP DELAY PF DELAY LOS DELAY LOS EB TR 0.537 0.570 100 10. 1 2865 0. 2 0.85 8. 8 B 8. 8 B WB L 0. 508 0. 150 100 29.7 262 1.4 1 .00 31.1 D T 0.146 0.720 100 3 . 3 2644 0.0 0.85 2 . 8 A 10.0 B NB SB L 0. 416 0. 280 100 22 . 3 433 0. 4 1 . 00 22 . 7 C TR 0.570 0. 280 100 23 .4 433 1 . 3 0. 85 21.0 C 21 .7 C INTERSECTION DELAY : 11 . 3 secs/veh LEVEL OF SERVICE : B 1/17/1990 CHRISTOPHER BROWN INTERSECTION RENT02P W -+- E N.E. PARK DRIVE E/W STREET <--- 2 *--- 1 V /\ 2 ---> <* *> I I N.E. PARK DRIVE E/W STREET 1 1 846 348 > < EB TOTAL WB TOTAL 846 0 120 468 NB I-405 OFF RAMP V N/S STREET V 90 534 <. ,> I I I I I NB TOTAL 624 CHRISTOPHER BROWN 1/17/1990 SUNSET GARDENS RENT02P INTERSECTION : N.E. PARK DRIVE @ NB I-405 OFF RAMP WEEKDAY P.M. PEAK 1990 CBD?N ACTUATED SIGNAL TRAFFIC & ROADWAY CONDITIONS GRADE HV ADJ. PKG LN. BUSES CONF. PEDS PED BUTTON ARR APP (%) (%) Y/N Nm (Nb) PHF (peds/hr) Y/N SEC TYPE EB 4 1 N 0 0 0. 90 0 N 0.0 3 WB -4 1 N 0 0 0. 90 0 N 0. 0 3 NB -2 1 N 0 0 0.90 0 N 0. 0 3 GEOMETRICS / VOLUMES LANE GROUPS VOLUME 1 2 3 APP LT TH RT MVM LNS WD MVM LNS WD MVM LNS WD EB 0 846 0 T 2 24.0 WB 120 348 0 L 1 12.0 T 2 24 . 0 NB 90 0 534 L 1 12.0 R 1 12 .0 SIGNAL PHASING APP PHASE 1ST MV 2ND MV 3RD MV PROT PMSV G Y+R EB 2 T 39 61 WB 1 L T L 11 89 WB 2 T 39 61 NB 3 L R LR 50 50 PAGE 1 CHRISTOPHER BROWN 1/17/1990 SUNSET GARDENS RENT02P INTERSECTION : N.E. PARK DRIVE @ NB I-405 OFF RAMP WEEKDAY P.M. PEAK 1990 CBD ? N ACTUATED SIGNAL VOLUME ADJUSTMENT APPROACH LANE GROUP FLOW RATE LANE UTIL ADJ FLOW PROP OF TURNS MVM VOLUME IN GROUP FACTOR RATE LT RT EB T 846 940 1 .00 940 0 .00 0.00 WB L 120 133 1. 00 133 1 .00 0.00 T 348 387 1 . 00 387 0.00 0.00 NB L 90 100 1 .00 100 1 .00 0. 00 R 534 593 1.00 593 0.00 1 .00 SATURATION FLOW IDEAL # OF ADJUSTMENT FACTORS ADJ. APP MVM SAT FLOW LANES WIDTH H.V. GRADE PARK BUS AREA RT LT FLOW EB T 1800 2 1 .00 1 . 00 0. 98 1. 00 1 .00 1 .00 1 . 00 1 .00 3528 WB L 1800 1 1 .00 1 . 00 1 .02 1 .00 1 . 00 1. 00 1 . 00 0.95 1744 T 1800 2 1 .00 1 . 00 1 . 02 1.00 1 . 00 1.00 1.00 1.00 3672 NB L 1800 1 1.00 1.00 1.01 1 . 00 1. 00 1 . 00 1 .00 0. 85 1545 R 1800 1 1 . 00 1 .00 1 .01 1.00 1 .00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1545 PAGE 2 CHRISTOPHER BROWN 1/17/1990 SUNSET GARDENS RENTO2P INTERSECTION : N.E. PARK DRIVE @ NB I-405 OFF RAMP WEEKDAY P.M. PEAK 1990 CBD ? N ACTUATED SIGNAL CAPACITY ANALYSIS LN GR ADJ FLOW PMSV ADJ SAT FLOW GREEN LN GR V/C APP MVM RATE LT FLOW FLW RT RATIO CRIT ? RATIO CAPACITY RATIO EB T 940 0 3528 0. 266 Y 0. 390 1376 0. 683 WB L 133 0 1744 0. 076 Y 0. 110 192 0. 693 T 387 0 3672 0 .105 N 0.500 1836 0. 211 NB L 100 0 1545 0. 065 N 0.500 772 0. 130 R 593 0 1545 0 . 384 Y 0. 500 772 0. 768 CYCLE LENGTH : 100.0 SUM OF CRITICAL LANES' FLOW RATIOS : 0 . 726 LOSS TIME PER CYCLE : 9 INTERSECTION V/C : 0.798 LEVEL OF SERVICE LN GR V/C GREEN CYC 1st LN GR 2nd LN GR LN GR APP APP APP MVM RATIO RATIO LEN DELAY CAP DELAY PF DELAY LOS DELAY LOS EB T 0.683 0. 390 100 19. 3 1376 1 .0 0. 85 17. 3 C 17. 3 C WB L 0.693 0 . 110 100 32 . 6 192 6 . 9 1 .00 39.5 D T 0. 211 0.500 100 10 . 6 1836 0.0 0.85 9.0 B 16. 8 C NB L 0.130 0. 500 100 10. 2 772 0.0 1.00 10 . 2 B R 0. 768 0.500 100 15. 4 772 3 . 3 0.85 15.9 C 15. 1 C INTERSECTION DELAY : 16.4 secs/veh LEVEL OF SERVICE : C 1/17/1990 CHRISTOPHER BROWN INTERSECTION RENT03P W -+- E N.E. PARK DRIVE E/W STREET <--- 2 *--- 1 v /\ 2 --*> v <* *> I I N.E. PARK DRIVE I E/W STREET • 1 1 1320 460 > < EB TOTAL WB TOTAL 1380 60 155 615 SUNSET BOULEVARD v N/S STREET v 20 285 <. .> I I I I NB TOTAL 305 CHRISTOPHER BROWN 1/17/1990 SUNSET GARDENS RENT03P INTERSECTION : N.E. PARK DRIVE @ SUNSET BOULEVARD WEEKDAY P.M. PEAK 1990 CBD?N ACTUATED SIGNAL TRAFFIC & ROADWAY CONDITIONS GRADE HV ADJ. PKG LN. BUSES CONF. PEDS PED BUTTON ARR APP (%) (%) Y/N Nm (Nb) PHF (peds/hr) Y/N SEC TYPE EB 4 1 N 0 0 0. 90 0 N 0. 0 3 WB -4 1 N 0 0 0.90 0 N 0. 0 3 NB -2 1 N 0 0 0 . 90 0 N 0.0 3 GEOMETRICS / VOLUMES LANE GROUPS VOLUME 1 2 3 APP LT TH RT MVM LNS WD MVM LNS WD MVM LNS WD EB 0 1320 60 TR 2 24 . 0 WB 155 460 0 L 1 12.0 T 2 24 .0 NB 20 0 285 L 1 12 .0 R 1 12. 0 SIGNAL PHASING APP PHASE 1ST MV 2ND MV 3RD MV PROT PMSV G Y+R EB 2 TR R 61 39 WB 1 L T L 14 86 WB 2 T 61 39 NB 3 L R LR 25 75 PAGE 1 .f CHRISTOPHER BROWN 1/17/1990 SUNSET GARDENS RENTO3P INTERSECTION : N.E. PARK DRIVE @ SUNSET BOULEVARD WEEKDAY P.M. PEAK 1990 CBD .? N ACTUATED SIGNAL VOLUME ADJUSTMENT APPROACH LANE GROUP FLOW RATE LANE UTIL ADJ FLOW PROP OF TURNS MVM VOLUME IN GROUP FACTOR RATE LT RT EB TR 1380 1533 1 .00 1533 0.00 0.04 WB L 155 172 1 . 00 172 1.00 0.00 T 460 511 1 .00 511 0.00 0.00 NB L 20 22 1.00 22 1.00 0. 00 R 285 317 1.00 317 0.00 1.00 SATURATION FLOW IDEAL # OF ADJUSTMENT FACTORS ADJ. APP MVM SAT FLOW LANES WIDTH H.V. GRADE PARK BUS AREA RT LT FLOW EB TR 1800 2 1 . 00 1 . 00 0. 9.8 1 .00 1.00 1 .00 0.99 1.00 3493 WB L 1800 1 1 .00 1.00 1 .02 1 .00 1 .00 1.00 1 . 00 0.95 1744 T . 1800 2 1. 00 1.00 1 . 02 1.00 1.00 1 .00 1.00 1.00 3672 NB L 1800 1 1.00 1 . 00 1 .01 1.00 1 .00 1 .00 1 .00 0.85 1545 R 1800 1 1.00 1.00 1 .01 1 . 00 1.00 1.00 0. 85 1.00 1545 RAGE .2 CHRISTOPHER BROWN 1/17/1990 SUNSET GARDENS RENTO3P INTERSECTION : N.E. PARK DRIVE @ SUNSET BOULEVARD WEEKDAY R.M. PEAK 1990 CBD ? N ACTUATED SIGNAL CAPACITY ' ANALYSIS LN GR ADJ FLOW PMSV ADJ SAT FLOW GREEN LN GR V/C APP MVM RATE LT FLOW ' FLW RT RATIO CRIT ? RATIO CAPACITY RATIO EB TR • 1533 0 3493 ' 0.439 Y 0. 610 2111 0. 719 WB L 172 0 1744 0.099 Y 0. 140 244 0.705 . T 511 • 0 . 3672 0. 139 N 0. 750 2754 0. 186 NB L 22 0 1545 0.014 N 0. 250 386 0. 057 R 317 0 1545 0. 205 Y 0. 250 386 0. 821 CYCLE LENGTH : 100. 0 SUM OF CRITICAL LANES' FLOW RATIOS : 0. 743 LOSS TIME PER CYCLE : 9 INTERSECTION V/C '. 0. 816 LEVEL OF SERVICE LN GR V/C GREEN CYC 1st LN GR 2nd LN GR Lit GR APP APP APP MVM RATIO RATIO LEN DELAY CAP DELAY PF bELAY LOS DELAY LOS EB TR 0.719 0.610 100 10. 3 2131 0. 8 0.85 9. 4 B 9.4 B WB L 0.705 0.140 100 31. 2 244 6. 0 1:00 37. 2 b T 0.186 0.750 100 2 . 8 2754 0.0 Oi85 2. 4 A 11 . 1 B NB L 0.057 0. 250 100 ' 21. 7 386 0. 0 1:00 21 . 7 C R 0.821 0. 250 100 26. 9 .386 9. 1 0:85 30.6 D 29.9 b INTERSECTION BELAY 3 12 . 6 secs/veh LEVEL OF SERVICE B CHRISTOPHER BROWN 1/17/1990 SUNSET GARDENS RENTO4P INTERSECTION : ABERDEEN AVENUE NE @ NE SUNSET BOULEVARD WEEKDAY P.M. PEAK 1990 CBD?N UNSIGNALIZED - MAJOR STREET RUNS NORTH / SOUTH TRAFFIC & ROADWAY CONDITIONS GRADE HV ADJ. PKG LN. BUSES CONF. PEDS PED BUTTON ARR APP (%) (%) Y/N Nm (Nb) PHF (peds/hr) Y/N SEC TYPE EB -2 1 N 0 0 0 . 90 0 N 0. 0 3 NB 2 1 N 0 0 0. 90 0 N 0 .0 3 SB -2 1 N 0 0 0 . 90 0 N 0.0 3 GEOMETRICS / VOLUMES LANE GROUPS VOLUME 1 2 3 APP LT TH RT MVM LNS WD MVM LNS WD MVM LNS WD EB 3 0 100 L 1 12. 0 R 1 12 . 0 , NB 147 360 0 L 1 12. 0 T 1 12 .0 SB 0 210 5 TR 1 12.0 CHRISTOPHER BROWN 1/17/1990 SUNSET GARDENS RENTO4P INTERSECTION : ABERDEEN AVENUE NE @ NE SUNSET BOULEVARD WEEKDAY P.M. PEAK 1990 CBD?N UNSIGNALIZED - MAJOR STREET RUNS NORTH / SOUTH UNSIGNALIZED CRITICAL GAPS CRITICAL GAPS (SEC) APP LEFT TURN THROUGH RIGHT TURN EB 6. 30 --- 5.20 NB 4 . 70 --- --- SB --- --- --- V O L U M E ALLOCATION TO LANES LANE 1 LANE 2 LANE 3 APP L T R LTR LTR EB 3 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 NB 147 0 0 0 360 0 0 0 0 SB 0 210 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 UNSIGNALIZED APP LANE 1 LANE 2 LANE 3 EB RESERVE CAPACITY 305 777 --- LEVEL OF SERVICE B A NB RESERVE CAPACITY 787 --- --- LEVEL OF SERVICE A SB RESERVE CAPACITY --- --- --- LEVEL OF SERVICE MAJOR STREET - NB/SB CHRISTOPHER BROWN 1/17/1990 SUNSET GARDENS RENT05P INTERSECTION : NE SUNSET BOULEVARD @ NB I-405 ON RAMP WEEKDAY P.M. PEAK 1990 CBD?N UNSIGNALIZED - MAJOR STREET RUNS EAST / WEST TRAFFIC & ROADWAY CONDITIONS GRADE HV ADJ. PKG LN. BUSES CONF. PEDS PED BUTTON ARR APP (%) (%) Y/N Nm (Nb) PHF (peds/hr) Y/N SEC TYPE EB 2 1 N 0 0 0 . 90 0 N 0.0 3 WB -2 1 N 0 0 0 .90 0 N 0.0 3 SB 0 0 N 0 • 0 0. 90 0 N 0.0 3 GEOMETRICS / VOLUMES LANE GROUPS VOLUME 1 2 3 APP LT TH RT MVM LNS WD MVM LNS WD MVM LNS WD EB 474 528 0 L 1 12. 0 T 1 12.0 WB 0 384 6 T 2 24. 0 R 1 12 .0 SB 0 0 0 CHRISTOPHER BROWN 1/17/1990 SUNSET GARDENS RENT05P INTERSECTION : NE SUNSET BOULEVARD @ NB I-405 ON RAMP WEEKDAY P.M. PEAK 1990 CBD?N UNSIGNALIZED - MAJOR STREET RUNS EAST / WEST UNSIGNALIZED CRITICAL GAPS CRITICAL GAPS (SEC) APP LEFT TURN THROUGH RIGHT TURN EB 4 . 70 --- --- WB --- --- --- SB 6 . 30 --- 5. 20 VOLUME ALLOCATION TO LANES LANE 1 LANE 2 LANE 3 APP L T R L T R L T R EB 474 0 0 0 528 0 0 0 0 WB 0 192 0 0 192 0 0 0 6 SB 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 UNSIGNALIZED APP LANE 1 LANE 2 LANE 3 EB RESERVE CAPACITY 228 --- --- LEVEL OF SERVICE C WB RESERVE CAPACITY --- --- --- LEVEL OF SERVICE SB RESERVE CAPACITY --- --- --- LEVEL OF SERVICE MAJOR STREET - EB/WB 1/17%1990 CHRISTOPHER BROWN INTERSECTION RENT11A W -+- E SB TOTAL SB I-405 OFF RAMP ^ 0 248 N/S STREET A I I WB TOTAL <f A> 1241 1514 211 i 37 273 V 0 V 1 1 ` N.E. PARK DRIVE I I E/W STREET <* V *> <--- 2 *--- • /\ 3 --*> V N.E. PARK DRIVE E/W STREET 0 A 0 A 0 0 <. .> EB TOTAL I 281 157 I I > SB I-405 ON RAMP N/S STREET NB TOTAL 124 0 V , CHRISTOPHER BROWN - 1/17/1990 SUNSET GARDENS RENTI1A INTERSECTION N.E. PARK DRIVE @ SB I-405 ON RAMP @ - SB I-405 OFF RAMP WEEKDAY A.M. PEAK 1991 W/ PROJECT CBD?N ACTUATED SIGNAL TRAFFIC & ROADWAY CONDITIONS GRADE HV ADJ. PKG LN. BUSES CONF. PEDS PED BUTTON ARR APP (%) (%) Y/N Nm (Nb) PHF (peds/hr) Y/N SEC TYPE EB 4 1 . N 0 0 0.90 0 N 0.0 3 WB -4 1 N 0 0 0.90 0 N 0.0 3 NB . 0 0 N 0 0 0.90 0 N 0.0 3 SB -2 1 N 0 0 0.90 .0 N 0.0 3 GEOMETRICS / VOLUMES LANE GROUPS VOLUME 1 2 3 APP LT TH RT . MVM LNS WD MVM LNS WD MVM LNS WD EB 0 157 124 TR 3 36.0 WB 273 1241 0 L 1 12 .0 T 2 24 .0 NB 0 0 0 SB 37 0 211 L 1 12.0 TR 1 12 .0 SIGNAL PHASING APP PHASE 1ST MV 2ND MV 3RD MV PROT PMSV G Y+R EB 2 TR R 42 58 WB 1 L T L 33 67 WB 2 T 42 58 SB 3 L TR LR 25 75 PAGE 1, CHRISTOPHER BROWN 1/17/1990 SUNSET GARDENS RENT11A INTERSECTION : N.E. PARK DRIVE @ SB I-405 ON RAMP @ SB I-405 OFF RAMP WEEKDAY A.M. PEAK 1991 W/ PROJECT CBD ? N ACTUATED SIGNAL VOLUME ADJUSTMENT APPROACH LANE GROUP FLOW RATE LANE UTIL ADJ FLOW PROP OF TURNS MVM VOLUME IN GROUP FACTOR RATE LT RT EB TR 281 312 1 .00 312 0 .00 0. 44 WB L 273 303 1.00 303 1 . 00 0.00 T 1241 1379 1 . 00 1379 0.00 0.00 NB SB L 37 41 1 . 00 41 1 .00 0.00 TR 211 234 1.00 234 0 .00 1 .00 SATURATION FLOW IDEAL # OF ADJUSTMENT FACTORS ADJ. APP MVM SAT FLOW LANES WIDTH H.V. GRADE PARK BUS AREA RT LT FLOW ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- EB TR 1800 3 1 .00 1 .00 0. 98 1 .00 1 .00 1 .00 0.93 1.00 4922 WB L 1800 1 1 .00 1 . 00 1 . 02 1.00 1 .00 1 .00 1 . 00 0. 95 1744 T 1800 2 1.00 1 .00 1.02 1. 00 1.00 1.00 1 .00 1.00 3672 NB SB L 1800 1 1 .00 1 . 00 1 .01 1 . 00 1.00 1 .00 1 .00 0. 85 1545 . TR 1800 1 1.00 1.00 1 .01 1 .00 1.00 1 .00 0.85 1.00 1545 PAGE 2' CHRISTOPHER BROWN 1/17/1990 SUNSET GARDENS RENT11A INTERSECTION : N.E. PARK DRIVE @ SB I-405 ON RAMP @ SB I-405 OFF RAMP WEEKDAY A.M. PEAK 1991 W/ PROJECT CBD ? N ACTUATED SIGNAL CAPACITY ANALYSIS LN GR ADJ FLOW PMSV ADJ SAT FLOW GREEN LN GR V/C APP MVM RATE LT FLOW FLW RT RATIO CRIT ? RATIO CAPACITY RATIO EB TR 312 0 4922 0. 063 N 0 . 420 2067 0 . 151 WB L 303 0 1744 0 . 174 N 0. 330 576 0. 526 T 1379 0 3672 0 . 376 Y 0. 750 2754 0. 501 NB SB L 41 0 1545 0. 027 N 0. 250 386 0. 106 TR 234 0 1545 0. 151 Y 0. 250 386 0.606 CYCLE LENGTH : 100 . 0 SUM OF CRITICAL LANES' FLOW RATIOS : 0 . 527 LOSS TIME PER CYCLE : 9 INTERSECTION V/C : 0.579 LEVEL OF SERVICE LN GR V/C GREEN CYC 1st LN GR 2nd LN GR LN GR APP APP APP MVM RATIO RATIO LEN DELAY CAP DELAY PF DELAY LOS DELAY LOS EB TR 0. 151 0. 420 100 13 .6 2067 0 .0 0. 85 11 .6 B 11 . 5 B WB L 0. 526 0 . 330 100 20.6 576 0.7 1 .00 21 . 3 C T 0. 501 0. 750 100 3 .8 2754 0.1 0.85 3 . 3 A 6 .5 B NB SB L 0. 106 0. 250 100 22 .0 386 0. 0 1.00 22 .0 C TR 0.606 0. 250 100 25. 2 386 1 .9 0.85 23 . 0 C 22 . 8 C INTERSECTION DELAY : 9 . 2 secs/veh LEVEL OF SERVICE : B 1/17/1990 CHRISTOPHER BROWN INTERSECTION RENT12A W -+- E N.E. PARK DRIVE E/W STREET <--- 2 *--- 1 V /\ \/ 2 ---> <* *> I I N.E. PARK DRIVE E/W STREET 1 1 194 1094 > < EB TOTAL WB TOTAL 194 0 365 1459 NB I-405 OFF RAMP V N/S STREET V 420 105 <. .> I I I I NB TOTAL 525 CHRISTOPHER BROWN 1/17/1990 SUNSET GARDENS RENT12A INTERSECTION : N.E. PARK DRIVE @ NB 1-405 OFF RAMP WEEKDAY A.M. PEAK 1991 W/ PROJECT CBD?N ACTUATED SIGNAL TRAFFIC & ROADWAY CONDITIONS GRADE HV ADJ. PKG LN. BUSES CONF. PEDS PED BUTTON ARR APP (%) (%) Y/N Nm (Nb) PHF (peds/hr) Y/N SEC TYPE EB 4 1 N 0 0 0. 90 0 N 0. 0 3 WB -4 1 N 0 0 0. 90 0 N 0. 0 3 NB -2 1 N 0 0 0. 90 0 N 0.0 3 GEOMETRICS / VOLUMES LANE GROUPS VOLUME 1 2 3 APP LT TH RT MVM LNS WD MVM LNS WD MVM LNS WD EB 0 194 0 T 2 24 .0 WB 365 1094 0 L 1 12 .0 T 2 24 .0 NB 420 0 105 L 1 12 .0 R 1 12. 0 SIGNAL PHASING APP PHASE 1ST MV 2ND MV 3RD MV PROT PMSV G Y+R EB 2 T 19 81 WB 1 L T L 38 62 WB 2 T 19 81 NB 3 L R LR 43 57 PAGE 1 CHRISTOPHER BROWN 1/17/1990 SUNSET GARDENS RENT12A INTERSECTION : N.E. PARK DRIVE @ NB I-405 OFF RAMP WEEKDAY A.M. PEAK 1991 W/ PROJECT CBD ? N ACTUATED SIGNAL VOLUME ADJUSTMENT APPROACH LANE GROUP FLOW RATE LANE UTIL ADJ FLOW PROP OF TURNS MVM VOLUME IN GROUP FACTOR RATE LT RT EB T 194 216 1.00 216 0.00 0.00 WB L 365 406 1.00 406 1.00 0. 00 T 1094 1216 1. 00 1216 0.00 0.00 NB L 420 467 1. 00 467 1.00 0.00 R 105 117 1.00 117 0.00 1.00 SATURATION FLOW IDEAL # OF ADJUSTMENT FACTORS ADJ. APP MVM SAT FLOW LANES WIDTH H.V. GRADE PARK BUS AREA RT LT FLOW ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- EB T 1800 2 1. 00 1 . 00 0. 98 1.00 1.00 1 .00 1 .00 1.00 3528 WB L 1800 1 1 .00 1 . 00 1 .02 1. 00 1 .00 1 .00 1 . 00 0 . 95 1744 T 1800 2 1 .00 , 1 .00 1 . 02 1 . 00 1 .00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1. 00 3672 NB L 1800 1 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 01 1. 00 1 .00 1 . 00 1 . 00 0. 85 1545 R 1800 1 1.00 1 .00 1 .01 1 .00 1 . 00 1 .00 0. 85 1 . 00 1545 PAGE 2 CHRISTOPHER BROWN 1/17/1990 SUNSET GARDENS RENT12A INTERSECTION : N.E. PARK DRIVE @ NB I-405 OFF RAMP WEEKDAY A.M. PEAK 1991 W/ PROJECT CBD ? N ACTUATED SIGNAL CAPACITY ANALYSIS LN GR ADJ FLOW PMSV ADJ SAT FLOW GREEN LN GR V/C APP MVM RATE LT FLOW FLW RT RATIO CRIT ? RATIO CAPACITY RATIO EB T 216 0 3528 0 .061 N 0.190 670 0. 322 WB L 406 0 1744 0. 233 N 0. 380 663 0.612 T 1216 0 3672 0 . 331 Y 0.570 2093 0.581 NB L 467 0 1545 0. 302 Y 0. 430 664 0.703 R 117 0 1545 0.076 N 0.430 664 0.176 CYCLE LENGTH : 100 .0 SUM OF CRITICAL LANES' FLOW RATIOS : 0. 633 LOSS TIME PER CYCLE : 9 INTERSECTION V/C : 0. 696 LEVEL OF SERVICE LN GR V/C GREEN CYC 1st LN GR 2nd LN GR LN GR APP APP APP MVM RATIO RATIO LEN DELAY CAP DELAY PF DELAY LOS DELAY LOS --- --- --- --- -- --- EB T 0. 322 0. 190 100 26 . 6 670 0 . 1 0. 85 22 . 7 C 22 . 5 C WB L 0.612 0. 380 100 19 .0 663 1 . 2 1.00 20. 2 C T 0. 581 0.570 100 10 .5 2093 0. 3 0. 85 9. 2 B 11 . 9 B NB L 0.703 0. 430 100 17.7 664 2 . 3 1 .00 20 .0 C R 0.176 0. 430 100 13 .4 664 0.0 0.85 11. 4 B 18. 2 C INTERSECTION DELAY : 14 . 4 secs/veh LEVEL OF SERVICE : B '1/17/1990 CHRISTOPHER BROWN INTERSECTION RENT13A N 1 W -+- E H.E. PARK DRIVE E/W STREET <--- 2 *--- 1 • /\ \/ 2 --*> v <* *> N.E. PARK DRIVE I I E/W STREET I • 1 1 1 • 299 1023 > • • < . EB TOTAL WB TOTAL 315 16, 362 1385 SUNSET BOULEVARD v N/S STREET v 74 26 <. ;> I I 1 I I NB TOTAL 100 CHRISTOPHER BROWN 1/17/1990 SUNSET GARDENS RENT13A INTERSECTION : N.E. PARK DRIVE @ SUNSET BOULEVARD WEEKDAY A.M. PEAK 1991 W/ PROJECT CBD?N ACTUATED SIGNAL TRAFFIC & ROADWAY CONDITIONS GRADE HV ADJ. PKG LN. BUSES CONF. PEDS PED BUTTON ARR APP (%) (% ) Y/N Nm (Nb) PHF (peds/hr) Y/N SEC TYPE EB 4 1 N 0 0 0. 90 0 N 0.0 3 WB -4 1 N 0 0 0 . 90 0 N 0.0 3 NB -2 1 N 0 0 0.90 0 N 0 .0 3 GEOMETRICS / VOLUMES LANE GROUPS VOLUME 1 2 3 APP LT TH RT MVM LNS WD MVM LNS WD MVM LNS WD EB 0 299 16 TR 2 24.0 WB 362 1023 0 L 1 12.0 T 2 24.0 NB 74 0 26 L 1 12.0 R 1 12 .0 SIGNAL PHASING APP PHASE 1ST MV 2ND MV 3RD MV PROT PMSV G Y+R EB 2 TR R 27 73 WB 1 L T L 61 39 WB 2 T 27 73 NB 3 L R LR 12 88 PAGE 1 , •- CHRISTOPHER BROWN 1/17/1990 SUNSET GARDENS RENT13A INTERSECTION : N.E. PARK DRIVE @ SUNSET BOULEVARD WEEKDAY A.M. PEAK 1991 W/ PROJECT CBD ? N ACTUATED SIGNAL VOLUME ADJUSTMENT APPROACH LANE GROUP FLOW RATE LANE UTIL ADJ FLOW PROP OF TURNS MVM VOLUME IN GROUP FACTOR RATE LT RT EB TR 315 350 1.00 350 0.00 0.05 WB L 362 402 1.00 402 1 .00 0.00 T 1023 1137 1.00 1137 0.00 0.00 NB L 74 82 1 .00 82 1.00 0.00 R 26 29 1 . 00 29 0.00 1.00 SATURATION FLOW IDEAL # OF ADJUSTMENT FACTORS ADJ. APP MVM SAT. FLOW LANES WIDTH H.V. GRADE PARK BUS AREA RT LT FLOW EB TR 1800 2 1 .00 1.00 0.98 1 .00 1 .00 1.00 0.99 1.00 3493 WB L 1800 1 1 .00 1.00 1.02 1 .00 1.00 1 .00 1.00 0. 95 1744 T 1800 2 1.00 1 .00 1 .02 1.00 1 .00 1.00 1.00 1.00 3672 NB L 1800 1 1.00 1 .00 1 .01 1.00 1.00 1 .00 1.00 0.85 1545 R 1800 1 1 .00 1. 00 1.01 1 .00 1.00 1.00 0.85 1 .00 1545 , PAGE 2, CHRISTOPHER BROWN 1/17/1990 SUNSET GARDENS RENT13A INTERSECTION : N.E. PARK DRIVE @ SUNSET BOULEVARD WEEKDAY A.M. PEAK 1991 W/ PROJECT CBD ? N ACTUATED SIGNAL CAPACITY ANALYSIS LN GR ADJ FLOW PMSV ADJ SAT FLOW GREEN LN GR V/C APP. MVM RATE LT FLOW FLW RT RATIO CRIT ? RATIO CAPACITY RATIO EB TR 350 0 3493 0 .100 Y 0. 270 943 0. 371 WB L 402 0 1744 0. 231 Y 0. 610 1064 0. 378 T 1137 0 3672 0 . 310 N 0.880 3231 0. 352 NB L 82 0 1545 0. 053 Y 0. 120 185 0.443 R 29 0 1545 0. 019 N 0 . 120 185 0.157 CYCLE LENGTH : 100. 0 SUM OF CRITICAL LANES' FLOW RATIOS : 0 . 384 LOSS TIME PER CYCLE : 9 INTERSECTION V/C : 0 . 422 LEVEL OF SERVICE LN GR V/C GREEN CYC 1st LN GR 2nd LN GR LN GR APP APP APP MVM RATIO RATIO LEN DELAY CAP DELAY PF DELAY LOS DELAY LOS --- --- --- --- -- --- EB TR 0. 371 0 . 270 100 22 . 5 943 0. 1 0. 85 19. 2 C 19. 1 C WB L 0 . 378 0. 610 100 7.5 1064 0. 1 1.00 7 .6 B T 0. 352 0. 880 100 0.8 3231 0 .0 0. 85 0.7 A 2 . 5 A NB L 0. 443 0 . 120 100 31 . 1 185 1 . 1 1 . 00 32 . 2 D R 0.157 0. 120 100 30.0 185 0.0 0 . 85 25.5 D 30. 2 D INTERSECTION DELAY : 7.0 secs/veh LEVEL OF SERVICE : B CHRI5TOPHER BROWN 1/17/1990 SUNSET GARDENS RENT14A INTERSECTION : ABERDEEN AVENUE NE @ NE SUNSET BOULEVARD WEEKDAY A.M. PEAK 1991 W/ PROJECT CBD?N UNSIGNALIZED - MAJOR STREET RUNS NORTH / SOUTH TRAFFIC & ROADWAY CONDITIONS GRADE HV ADJ. PKG LN. BUSES CONF. PEDS PED BUTTON ARR APP (%) (%) Y/N Nm (Nb) PHF (peds/hr) Y/N SEC TYPE EB -2 1 N 0 0 0.90 0 N 0. 0 3 NB 2 1 N 0 0 0. 90 0 N 0.0 3 SB -2 1 N 0 0 0. 90 0 N 0.0 3 GEOMETRICS / VOLUMES LANE GROUPS VOLUME 1 2 3 APP LT TH RT MVM LNS WD MVM LNS WD MVM LNS WD EB 2 0 251 L 1 12 .0 R 1 12 .0 NB 45 117 0 L 1 12 .0 T 1 12 .0 SB 0 376 2 TR 1 12 .0 _ CHRISTOPHER BROWN 1/17/1990 SUNSET GARDENS RENT14A INTERSECTION : ABERDEEN AVENUE NE @, NE SUNSET BOULEVARD WEEKDAY A.M. PEAK 1991 W/ PROJECT CBD?N UNSIGNALIZED - MAJOR STREET RUNS NORTH / SOUTH UNSIGNALIZED CRITICAL GAPS CRITICAL GAPS (SEC) APP LEFT TURN THROUGH RIGHT TURN EB 6. 30 --- 5. 20 . NB 4.70 --- --- SB --- --- --- V O L U M E ALLOCATION TO LANES LANE 1 LANE 2 • LANE 3 APP L T R L T R L T R EB 2 0 0 0 0 251 0 0 0 NB 45 0 0 0 117 0 0 0 0 SB 0 376 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 UNSIGNALIZED APP LANE 1 LANE .2 LANE 3 EB RESERVE CAPACITY 439 491 --- LEVEL OF SERVICE A A NB RESERVE CAPACITY 757 --- --- LEVEL OF SERVICE A SB RESERVE CAPACITY --- --- --- LEVEL OF SERVICE MAJOR STREET - NB/SB r r CHRISTOPHER BROWN 1/17/1990 SUNSET GARDENS RENT15A INTERSECTION : NE SUNSET BOULEVARD @ NB I-405 ON RAMP WEEKDAY A.M. PEAK 1991 W/ PROJECT CBD?N UNSIGNALIZED - MAJOR STREET RUNS EAST / WEST TRAFFIC & ROADWAY CONDITIONS GRADE HV ADJ. PKG LN. BUSES CONF. PEDS PED BUTTON ARR APP (%) (%) Y/N Nm (Nb) PHF (peds/hr) Y/N SEC TYPE EB 2 1 N 0 0 0 .90 0 N 0.0 3 WB -2 1 N 0 0 0. 90 0 N 0.0 3 SB 0 0 N 0 0 0. 90 0 N 0.0 3 GEOMETRICS / VOLUMES LANE GROUPS VOLUME 1 2 3 APP LT TH RT MVM LNS WD MVM LNS WD MVM LNS WD EB 163 184 0 L 1 12 .0 T 1 12 .0 WB 0 769 14 T 2 24 .0 R 1 12 .0 SB 0 0 0 CHRISTOPHER BROWN 1/17/1990 SUNSET GARDENS RENT15A INTERSECTION : NE SUNSET BOULEVARD @ NB I-405 ON RAMP WEEKDAY A.M. PEAK 1991 W/ PROJECT CBD?N UNSIGNALIZED - MAJOR STREET RUNS EAST / WEST UNSIGNALIZED CRITICAL GAPS CRITICAL GAPS (SEC) APP LEFT TURN THROUGH RIGHT TURN EB 4.70 --- --- WB --- --- --- SB 6. 30 --- 5. 20 VOLUME ALLOCATION TO LANES LANE 1 LANE 2 LANE 3 APP L T R L T R L T R EB 163 0 0 0 184 0 0 0 0 WB 0 384 0 0 385 0 0 0 14 SB 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 UNSIGNALIZED APP LANE 1 LANE 2 LANE 3 EB RESERVE CAPACITY 317 --- --- LEVEL OF SERVICE B WB RESERVE CAPACITY --- --- --- LEVEL OF SERVICE SB RESERVE CAPACITY --- --- --- LEVEL OF SERVICE • MAJOR STREET - EB/WB A r CHRISTOPHER BROWN 1/17/1990 SUNSET GARDENS RENT16A INTERSECTION : SITE ACCESS @ ABERDEEN AVENUE WEEKDAY A.M. PEAK 1991 W/ PROJECT CBD?N UNSIGNALIZED - MAJOR STREET RUNS NORTH / SOUTH TRAFFIC & ROADWAY CONDITIONS GRADE HV ADJ. PKG LN. BUSES CONF. PEDS PED BUTTON ARR APP (%) (%) Y/N Nm (Nb) PHF (peds/hr) Y/N SEC TYPE EB 2 0 N 0 0 0.90 0 N 0.0 3 NB 2 1 N 0 0 0. 90 0 N 0.0 3 SB -2 1 N 0 0 0. 90 0 N 0.0 3 GEOMETRICS / VOLUMES LANE GROUPS VOLUME 1 2 3 APP LT TH RT MVM LNS WD MVM LNS WD MVM LNS WD EB 4 0 21 LR 1 12.0 NB 5 42 0 LT 1 12.0 SB 0 232 1 TR 1 12 .0 , CHRISTOPHER BROWN 1/17/1990 SUNSET GARDENS RENT16A INTERSECTION : SITE ACCESS @ ABERDEEN AVENUE WEEKDAY A.M. PEAK 1991 W/ PROJECT CBD?N UNSIGNALIZED - MAJOR STREET RUNS NORTH / SOUTH UNSIGNALIZED CRITICAL GAPS CRITICAL GAPS (SEC) APP LEFT TURN THROUGH RIGHT TURN EB 6.30 --- 5. 20 NB 4 .70 --- --- SB --- --- --- V O L U M E ALLOCATION TO LANES LANE 1 LANE 2 LANE 3 APP L T R L T R L T R EB 4 0 21 0 0 0 0 0 0 NB 5 42 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SB 0 232 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 UNSIGNALIZED APP LANE 1 LANE 2 LANE 3 EB RESERVE CAPACITY 780 --- --- LEVEL OF SERVICE A NB RESERVE CAPACITY 941 --- --- LEVEL OF SERVICE A SB RESERVE CAPACITY --- --- --- LEVEL OF SERVICE MAJOR STREET - NB/SB 1/17/1990 CHRISTOPHER BROWN INTERSECTION RENT11P W -+- E SB TOTAL SB I-405 OFF RAMP ^ 0 404 N/S STREET ` I I WB TOTAL I I 365 491 <' `> < 233 i 171 1 126 V 4 0 V 1 1 N.E. PARK DRIVE I E/W STREET <* V *> <--- 2 *--- 1 V /\ \/ 3 --*> V N.E. PARK DRIVE E/W STREET 0 A 0 ^ 0 0 <. .> EB TOTAL I I 1452 936 I 1 > SB I-405 ON RAMP N/S STREET NB TOTAL 516 0 V CHRISTOPHER BROWN 1/17/1990 SUNSET GARDENS RENT11P INTERSECTION : N.E. PARK DRIVE @ SB I-405 ON RAMP @ SB I-405 OFF RAMP WEEKDAY P.M. PEAK 1991 W/ PROJECT CBD?N ACTUATED SIGNAL TRAFFIC & ROADWAY CONDITIONS GRADE HV ADJ. PKG LN. BUSES CONF. PEDS PED BUTTON ARR APP (%) (%) Y/N Nm (Nb) PHF (peds/hr) Y/N SEC TYPE --- --- ---- ---- ---- EB 4 1 N 0 0 0. 90 0 N 0.0 3 WB -4 1 N 0 0 0 . 90 0 N 0 .0 3 NB 0 0 N 0 0 0 .90 0 N 0.0 3 SB -2 1 N 0 0 0.90 0 N 0.0 3 GEOMETRICS / VOLUMES LANE GROUPS VOLUME 1 2 3 APP LT TH RT MVM LNS WD MVM LNS WD MVM LNS WD EB 0 936 516 TR 3 36 .0 WB 126 365 0 L 1 12 . 0 T 2 24 .0 NB 0 0 0 SB 171 0 233 L 1 12 .0 TR 1 12 .0 SIGNAL PHASING APP PHASE 1ST MV 2ND MV 3RD MV PROT PMSV G Y+R --- ---- ---- -- --- EB 2 TR R 57 43 WB 1 L T L 15 85 WB 2 T 57 43 SB 3 L TR LR 28 72 PAGE 1' CHRISTOPHER BROWN 1/17/1990 SUNSET GARDENS RENT11P INTERSECTION : N.E. PARK DRIVE @ SB 1-405 ON RAMP @ SB 1-405 OFF RAMP WEEKDAY P.M. PEAK 1991 W/ PROJECT CBD ? N ACTUATED SIGNAL VOLUME ADJUSTMENT APPROACH LANE GROUP FLOW RATE 'LANE UTIL ADJ FLOW PROP OF TURNS MVM VOLUME IN GROUP FACTOR RATE LT RT EB TR 1452 1613 1.00 1613 0.00 0. 36 WB L 126 140 1.00 140 1 .00 0.00 T 36.5 406 1.00 406 0.00 0.00 NB SB L 171 190 1 .00 190 1.00 0.00 TR 233 259 1.00 259 0.00 1.00 SATURATION FLOW IDEAL # 'OF ADJUSTMENT FACTORS ADJ. APP MVM SAT FLOW LANES WIDTH H.V. GRADE PARK BUS AREA RT LT FLOW EB TR 1800 3 1 .00 1 .00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 5027 WB L 1800 1 1.00 1 .00 1.02 1 .00 1 .00 1.00 1 .00 0.95 1744 T 1800 2 1 .00 1.00 1.02 1.00 1.00 1. 00 1.00 1.00 3672 NB ' SB L ' 1800 1 1.00 1 .00 1.01 1 .00 1.00 1. 00 1.00 0.85 1545 TR ' 1800 1 1.00 1.00 1 .01 1 .00 1.00 1.00 0.85 1 .00 1545 1 PAGE 2 CHRISTOPHER BROWN 1/17/1990 SUNSET GARDENS RENT11P INTERSECTION N.E. PARK DRIVE @ SB I-405 ON RAMP @ SB I-405 OFF RAMP WEEKDAY P.M. PEAK 1991 W/ PROJECT CBD ? N ACTUATED SIGNAL CAPACITY ANALYSIS LN GR ADJ FLOW PMSV ADJ SAT FLOW GREEN LN GR V/C APP MVM RATE LT FLOW FLW RT RATIO CRIT ? RATIO CAPACITY RATIO EB TR 1613 0 5027 0. 321 Y 0. 570 2865 0 . 563 WB L 140 0 1744 0. 080 Y 0. 150 262 0.534 T 406 0 3672 0.111 N 0 . 720 2644 0. 154 NB SB L 190 0 1545 0. 123 N 0. 280 433 0. 439 TR 259 0 1545 0. 168 Y 0 . 280 433 0. 598 CYCLE LENGTH : 100 . 0 SUM OF CRITICAL LANES' FLOW RATIOS : 0. 569 LOSS TIME PER CYCLE : 9 INTERSECTION V/C : 0. 625 LEVEL OF SERVICE LN GR V/C GREEN CYC 1st LN GR 2nd LN GR LN GR APP APP APP MVM RATIO RATIO LEN DELAY CAP DELAY PF DELAY LOS DELAY LOS --- --- --- --- -- --- EB TR 0. 563 0 . 570 100 10 . 3 2865 0 . 2 0.85 8.9 B 8 . 9 B WB L 0 .534 0.150 100 29 .8 262 1.7 1 .00 31. 5 D T 0.154 0.720 100 3 .4 2644 0.0 0.85 2 .9 A 10 . 2 B NB SB L 0. 439 0 . 280 100 22 . 5 433 0. 5 1.00 23 .0 C TR 0 . 598 0. 280 100 23 .7 433 1.6 0.85 21 . 5 C 22 . 1 C INTERSECTION DELAY : 11 . 4 secs/veh LEVEL OF SERVICE : B 1/17/1990 CHRISTOPHER BROWN INTERSECTION RENT12P N W -+- E N.E. PARK DRIVE E/W STREET <--- 2 *--- 1 v /\ 2 ---> <* *> I I N.E. PARK DRIVE I I E/W STREET I I 1 1 888 365 > < EB TOTAL WB TOTAL 888 0 126 491 NB I-405 OFF RAMP v N/S STREET v 94 560 <. .> I I I I NB TOTAL 654 ' • ' CHRISTOPHER BROWN 1/17/1990 SUNSET GARDENS RENT12P INTERSECTION : N.E. PARK DRIVE @ NB I-405 OFF RAMP WEEKDAY P.M. PEAK 1991 W/ PROJECT CBD?N ACTUATED SIGNAL TRAFFIC & ROADWAY CONDITIONS GRADE HV ADJ. PKG LN. BUSES CONF. PEDS PED BUTTON ARR APP (%) (%) Y/N Nm (Nb) PHF (peds/hr) Y/N SEC TYPE EB 4 1 N 0 0 0.90 0 N 0.0 3 WB -4 1 N 0 0 0. 90 0 N 0.0 3 NB -2 1 N 0 0 0. 90 0 N 0.0 3 GEOMETRICS / VOLUMES LANE GROUPS VOLUME 1 2 3 APP LT TH RT MVM LNS WD MVM LNS WD MVM LNS WD EB 0 888 0 T 2 24. 0 WB 126 365 0 L 1 12.0 T 2 24.0 NB 94 0 560 L 1 12.0 R 1 12. 0 SIGNAL PHASING APP PHASE 1ST MV 2ND MV 3RD MV PROT PMSV G Y+R EB 2 T 39 61 WB 1 L T L 11 89 WB 2 T 39 61 NB 3 L R LR 50 50 • PAGE 1 CHRISTOPHER BROWN 1/17/1990 SUNSET GARDENS RENT12P INTERSECTION : N.E. PARK DRIVE @ NB I-405 OFF RAMP WEEKDAY P.M. PEAK 1991 W/ PROJECT CBD ? N ACTUATED SIGNAL VOLUME ADJUSTMENT APPROACH LANE GROUP FLOW RATE LANE UTIL ADJ FLOW PROP OF TURNS MVM VOLUME IN GROUP FACTOR RATE LT RT EB T 888 987 1 . 00 987 0.00 0 .00 WB L 126 140 1. 00 140 1.00 0.00 T 365 406 1 .00 406 0.00 0. 00 NB L 94 104 1 .00 104 1 . 00 0. 00 R 560 622 1 . 00 622 0.00 1.00 SATURATION FLOW IDEAL # OF ADJUSTMENT FACTORS ADJ. APP MVM SAT FLOW LANES WIDTH H.V. GRADE PARK BUS AREA RT LT FLOW ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- EB T 1800 2 1 .00 1 .00 0 . 98 1.00 1:00 1 . 00 1.00 1.00 3528 WB L 1800 1 1 .00 1 . 00 1 .02 1. 00 1. 00 1 . 00 1 .00 0. 95 1744 T 1800 2 1.00 1.00 1 . 02 1 .00 1.00 1.00 1 . 00 1. 00 3672 NB L 1800 1 1 .00 1. 00 1 . 01 1 . 00 1 . 00 1.00 1.00 0.85 1545 R 1800 1 1.00 1. 00 1 . 01 1.00 1.00 1 .00 0. 85 1.00 1545 PAGE 2 • CHRISTOPHER BROWN - 1/17/1990 SUNSET GARDENS RENT12P INTERSECTION : N.E. PARK DRIVE @ NB I-405 OFF RAMP WEEKDAY P.M. PEAK 1991 W/ PROJECT CBD ? N ACTUATED SIGNAL CAPACITY ANALYSIS LN GR ADJ FLOW PMSV ADJ SAT FLOW GREEN LN GR V/C APP MVM RATE LT FLOW FLW RT RATIO CRIT ? RATIO CAPACITY RATIO EB T 987 0 3528 0. 280 Y 0. 390 1376 0. 717 WB L 140 0 1744 0.080 Y 0.110 192 0. 729 T 406 0 3672 0. 111 N 0. 500 1836 0. 221 NB L 104 0 1545 0.067 N 0. 500 772 0. 135 R 622 0 1545 0.403 Y 0. 500 772 0. 806 CYCLE LENGTH : 100.0 SUM OF CRITICAL LANES' FLOW RATIOS : 0.763 LOSS TIME PER CYCLE : 9 INTERSECTION V/C : 0 . 838 LEVEL OF SERVICE LN GR V/C GREEN CYC 1st LN GR 2nd LN GR LN GR APP APP APP MVM RATIO RATIO LEN DELAY CAP DELAY PF DELAY LOS DELAY LOS EB T 0 .717 0. 390 100 19. 6 1376 1 . 3 0. 85 17.8 C 17 . 8 C WB L 0 .729 0.110 100 32 .7 192 8.8 1.00 41 .5 E T 0. 221 0.500 100 10. 7 1836 0.0 0.85 9. 1 B 17 . 4 C NB L 0. 135 0 .500 100 10. 2 772 0.0 1.00 10. 2 B R 0. 806 0.500 100 15.9 772 4.4 0. 85 17. 3 C 16. 3 C INTERSECTION DELAY : 17 . 2 secs/veh LEVEL OF SERVICE : C 1/17/1990 CHRISTOPHER BROWN INTERSECTION RENTI3P N W -+- E N.E. PARK DRIVE E/W STREET <--- 2 • *--- 1 • v /.\ \/ 2 --*> V <* *> I N.E. PARK DRIVE I I E/W STREET I I 1 1385 . ' 483 ' > < EB TOTAL WB TOTAL 1449 64 163 646 SUNSET BOULEVARD v N/S STREET v 21 299 <. .> NB TOTAL 320 f ' CHRISTOPHER BROWN 1/17/1990 SUNSET GARDENS RENT13P INTERSECTION : N.E. PARK DRIVE @ SUNSET BOULEVARD WEEKDAY P.M. PEAK 1991 W/ PROJECT CBD?N ACTUATED SIGNAL TRAFFIC & ROADWAY - CONDITIONS GRADE HV ADJ. PKG LN. BUSES CONF. PEDS PED BUTTON ARR APP (%) (%) Y/N Nm (Nb) PHF (peds/hr) Y/N SEC TYPE EB 4 .1 N 0 0 0 .90 0 N 0.0 3 WB -4 1 N 0 0 0.90 0 N 0.0 3 NB -2 1 N 0 0 0.90 0 N 0.0 . 3 GEOMETRICS / VOLUMES • LANE GROUPS VOLUME 1 2 3 APP LT TH RT MVM LNS WD MVM LNS WD MVM LNS WD EB 0 1385 64 TR 2 24 .0. WB 163 483 0 L 1 12.0 T 2 24.0 NB 21 0 299 L 1 12.0 R 1 12.0 SIGNAL PHASING APP PHASE 1ST MV. 2ND MV 3RD MV PROT PMSV d Y+R EB 2 TR R 61 39 WB 1 L T L 14 86 WB 2 T 61 39 NB 3 L R LR 25 75 PAGE 1 ' CHRISTOPHER BROWN 1/17/1990 SUNSET GARDENS RENT13P INTERSECTION : N.E. PARK DRIVE @ SUNSET BOULEVARD WEEKDAY P.M. PEAK 1991 W/ PROJECT CBD ? N ACTUATED SIGNAL VOLUME ADJUSTMENT APPROACH LANE GROUP FLOW RATE LANE UTIL ADJ FLOW PROP OF TURNS MVM VOLUME IN GROUP FACTOR RATE LT RT EB TR 1449 1610 1 . 00 1610 0. 00 0.04 WB L 163 181 1 . 00 181 1 . 00 0.00 T 483 537 1 .00 537 0.00 0.00 NB L 21 23 1 . 00 23 1.00 0. 00 R 299 332 1.00 332 0.00 1 . 00 SATURATION FLOW IDEAL # OF ADJUSTMENT FACTORS ADJ. APP MVM SAT FLOW LANES WIDTH H.V. GRADE PARK BUS AREA RT LT FLOW ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- EB TR 1800 2 1 . 00 1.00 0. 98 1.00 1.00 1.00 0. 99 1 . 00 3493 WB L 1800 1 1 .00 1. 00 1 .02 1. 00 1. 00 1.00 1. 00 0.95 1744 T 1800 2 1.00 1 .00 1 .02 1 .00 1 .00 1 .00 1.00 1 .00 3672 NB L 1800 1 1 . 00 1 .00 1. 01 1.00 1 .00 1 . 00 1 .00 0 . 85 1545 R 1800 1 1 .00 1 .00 1.01 1. 00 1.00 1.00 0. 85 1.00 1545 • • . PAGE 2 CHRISTOPHER BROWN ' -- 1/17/1990 SUNSET GARDENS RENT13P INTERSECTION : N.E. PARK DRIVE @ SUNSET BOULEVARD WEEKDAY P.M. PEAK 1991 W/ PROJECT 'CBD ? N . ACTUATED SIGNAL CAPACITY ANALYSIS LN GR ADJ FLOW . PMSV ADJ SAT FLOW GREEN LN GR V/C . APP MVM RATE LT FLOW FLW RT RATIO CRIT ? RATIO CAPACITY RATIO EB TR 1610 . 0 3493 0.461 Y 0.610 2131 0. 756 WB L 181 0 1744 0. 104 Y 0. 140 244 0.742 T 537 0 3672 0.146 N 0.750 - 2754 0.195 NB L 23 0 1545 0.015 N 0. 250 386 0. 060 R 332 0 1545 0.215 Y 0. 250 - 386 0.860 CYCLE LENGTH : 100.0 SUM OF CRITICAL LANES' FLOW RATIOS t 0. 780 LOSS TIME PER CYCLE : 9 INTERSECTION V/C ,: 0. 857 LEVEL OF SERVICE LN GR V/C GREEN CYC 1st LN GR 2nd LN GR LN GR APP APP APP MVM RATIO RATIO LEN DELAY CAP DELAY PF DELAY LOS DELAY LOS EB TR 0.756 0.610 100 10.7 2131 1.1 0.85 .10.0 B 10.0 B WB L 0.742 0.140 . 100 31.4 244 7.8 1.00 39. 2 D T 0.195 0.750 100 2 .8 2754 0.0 0:85 2 . 4 A 11.7 B NB L 0.060 0. 250 100 21.7 386 0.0 1 .00 21. 7 C R 0.860 0. 250 100 27. 2 386 12. 2 0485 , 33 .5 D 32 .6 D INTERSECTION DELAY : 13 .4 secs/veh LEVEL OF SERVICE t B CHRISTOPHER BROWN 1/17/1990 SUNSET GARDENS RENT14P INTERSECTION : ABERDEEN AVENUE NE @ NE SUNSET BOULEVARD WEEKDAY P.M. PEAK 1991 W/. PROJECT CBD?N UNSIGNALIZED - MAJOR STREET RUNS NORTH / SOUTH TRAFFIC & ROADWAY CONDITIONS GRADE HV ADJ. PKG LN. BUSES CONF. PEDS PED BUTTON ARR APP (%) (%) Y/N Nm (Nb) PHF (peds/hr) Y/N SEC TYPE EB -2 1 N 0 0 0.90 0 N 0.0 3 NB 2 1 N 0 0 0. 90 0 N 0.0 3 SB -2 1 N 0 0 0 . 90 0 N 0.0 3 GEOMETRICS / VOLUMES LANE GROUPS VOLUME 1 2 3 APP LT TH RT MVM LNS WD MVM LNS WD MVM LNS WD EB 3 0 116 L 1 12.0 R 1 12 .0 NB 174 378 0 L 1 12. 0 T 1 12.0 SB 0 220 6 TR 1 12. 0 CHRISTOPHER BROWN 1/17/1990 SUNSET GARDENS RENT14P INTERSECTION : ABERDEEN AVENUE NE @ NE SUNSET BOULEVARD WEEKDAY P.M. PEAK 1991 W/ PROJECT CBD?N UNSIGNALIZED - MAJOR STREET RUNS NORTH / SOUTH UNSIGNALIZED CRITICAL GAPS CRITICAL GAPS (SEC) APP LEFT TURN THROUGH RIGHT TURN EB 6.30 --- 5.20 NB 4.70 --- --- SB --- --- --- V O L U M E ALLOCATION TO LANES LANE 1 LANE 2 LANE 3 APP L T R L T R L T R EB 3 0 0 0 0 116 0 0 0 NB 174 0 0 0 378 0 0 0 0 SB 0 220 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 UNSIGNALIZED APP LANE 1 LANE 2 LANE 3 EB RESERVE CAPACITY 271 752 --- LEVEL OF SERVICE C A NB RESERVE CAPACITY 743 --- --- LEVEL OF SERVICE A SB RESERVE CAPACITY --- --- --- LEVEL OF SERVICE MAJOR STREET - NB/SB t' CHRISTOPHER. BROWN -, 1/17/1990 SUNSET GARDENS RENT15P INTERSECTION : NE SUNSET BOULEVARD @ NB I-405 ON RAMP WEEKDAY P.M. PEAK 1991 W/ PROJECT CBD?N UNSIGNALIZED - MAJOR STREET RUNS EAST / WEST TRAFFIC & ROADWAY CONDITIONS GRADE HV ADJ. PKG LN. BUSES CONF. PEDS PED BUTTON ARR APP (%) (%) Y/N Nm (Nb) PHF (peds/hr) Y/N SEC TYPE EB 2 1 N 0 0 0. 90 0 N 0.0 3 WB -2 1 N 0 0 0.90 0 N 0.0 3 SB 0 0 N 0 0 0. 90 0 N 0.0 3 GEOMETRICS / VOLUMES LANE GROUPS VOLUME 1 2 3 APP LT TH RT MVM LNS WD MVM LNS WD MVM LNS WD EB 497 574 0 L 1 12 .0 T 1 12 .0 WB 0 414 6 T 2 24.0 R 1 12.0 SB 0 0 0 CHRISTOPHER BROWN 1/17/1990 SUNSET GARDENS RENT15P INTERSECTION : NE SUNSET BOULEVARD @ NB I-405 ON RAMP WEEKDAY P.M. PEAK 1991 W/ PROJECT CBD?N UNSIGNALIZED - MAJOR STREET RUNS EAST / WEST UNSIGNALIZED CRITICAL GAPS CRITICAL GAPS (SEC) APP LEFT TURN THROUGH RIGHT TURN EB 4 . 70 --- --- WB --- --- --- SB 6.30 --- 5. 20 VOLUME ALLOCATION TO LANES LANE 1 LANE 2 LANE 3 APP L T R L T R L T R EB 497 0 0 0 574 0 0 0 0 WB 0 207 0 0 207 0 0 0 6 SB 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 UNSIGNALIZED APP LANE 1 LANE 2 LANE 3 EB RESERVE CAPACITY 174 --- --- LEVEL OF SERVICE D WB RESERVE CAPACITY --- --- --- LEVEL OF SERVICE SB RESERVE CAPACITY --- --- --- LEVEL OF SERVICE MAJOR STREET - EB/WB CHRISTOPHER BROWN 1/17/1990 SUNSET GARDENS RENT16P INTERSECTION : SITE ACCESS @ ABERDEEN AVENUE WEEKDAY P.M. PEAK 1991 W/ PROJECT CBD?N UNSIGNALIZED - MAJOR STREET RUNS NORTH / SOUTH TRAFFIC & ROADWAY CONDITIONS GRADE HV ADJ. PKG LN. BUSES CONF. PEDS PED BUTTON ARR APP (%) (%) Y/N Nm (Nb) PHF (peds/hr) Y/N SEC TYPE EB 2 0 N 0 0 0. 90 0 N 0.0 3 NB 2 1 N 0 0 0 . 90 0 N 0 .0 3 SB -2 1 N 0 0 0.90 0 N 0.0 3 GEOMETRICS / VOLUMES LANE GROUPS VOLUME 1 2 3 APP LT TH RT MVM LNS WD MVM LNS WD MVM LNS WD EB 2 0 11 LR 1 12 .0 NB 21 159 0 LT 1 12. 0 SB 0 99 4 TR 1 12.0 CHRISTOPHER BROWN h 1/17/1990 SUNSET GARDENS RENT16P INTERSECTION : SITE ACCESS @ ABERDEEN AVENUE WEEKDAY P.M. PEAK 1991 W/ PROJECT CBD?N UNSIGNALIZED - MAJOR STREET RUNS NORTH / SOUTH UNSIGNALIZED CRITICAL GAPS CRITICAL GAPS (SEC) APP LEFT TURN THROUGH RIGHT TURN EB 6 . 30 --- 5. 20 NB 4 . 70 --- --- SB --- --- --- V O L U M E ALLOCATION TO LANES LANE 1 LANE 2 LANE 3 APP L T R L T R L T R EB 2 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 NB 21 159 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SB 0 99 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 UNSIGNALIZED APP LANE 1 LANE 2 LANE 3 EB RESERVE CAPACITY 893 --- --- LEVEL OF SERVICE A NB RESERVE CAPACITY 1057 --- --- LEVEL OF SERVICE A SB RESERVE CAPACITY --- --- --- LEVEL OF SERVICE MAJOR STREET - NB/SB CERTIFICATION OF NOTIFICATION OF ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS/SITE PLAN • * * *FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY* * * PROJECT TITLE: APPLICANT: tea,-,'4— QmecAe..ift% APPLICATION NUMBER: 'SA._006,_ The following is a list of adjacent property owners and their addresses. A notification of the pending site plan application shall be sent to these individuals as prescribed by Renton City Code, Chapter 7 Section 38 of Title IV (Building Regulations) of Ordinance No. 1628 relating to site plan approval. ASSESSOR'S NAME ADDRESS PARCEL NUMBER CHAMBERS , MICHAEL A. 9857 42nd AVE . SW 312380-0065 Seattle . WA 98136 YEN. FUN, TUNG 9850 California AVE SW 312380-0050 Seattle , WA 98163 HAYNES , MICHAEL S . 958 Aberdeen AVE. NE 082305-9141 Renton, WA 98056 WILLIAMS , JAMES D. 4091 E. 3rd AVE 082305-9045 Napa , California 94558 BLAIR, ROBERT & PEGGY 950 Sunset Blvd. NE 082305-9114 Renton, WA 98055 POTOSHNIK, WALTER 916 Sunset Blvd . NE 082305-9116 Renton, WA 98056 AUGUSTON, DONALD R. 912 Sunset Blvd. NE 082305-9103 Renton, WA 98056 DEL GUZZO, MARIE 902 Sunset Blvd . NE 082305-9007 Renton, WA 98056 PUNNING DWIBION CITY OF RENT ON DEC 0 7 1989 RECEIVED • . • ' ASSESSOR'S NAME ADDRESS PARCEL NUMBER . . . , • r ` 11 ASSESSOR'S ' NAME ADDRESS PARCEL NUMBER CERTIFICATION I, E. DENNIS RIE$Ehereby certify that the above list(s) of adjacent property owners and their addresses were taken from the records of the King County Assessor as prescribed by law. ,ATIEST:.,; Subscribed and sworn to before me. a Notary, Pu llc, in and for the State of Washington itesidin�g' - di on / on the._166, .clay_of aa v.:,ze4KIA/ra/ CERTIFICATION OF MAILING I. hereby certify that notices of the public meeting on the subject site plan approval were mailed on 1I2-41/qp , to each listed adjacent property owner as prescribed by law. ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me. a Notary Public. in and for the State of Washington residing at 4Ze on the anti, day ofq 1° ]O. l , SIGNED: SZKatikV , • FORM 20S .... . • , -....s.......,4,., • ,.,••••.-„,•cr•••••r.,:l..::'''''..:••,••••"..,,,, .i••.,'t••••",:,.'..' • , ,..•-,•• -,3..•••••••:.': ;••••••:•••,"-,:":i•,..!••••••••":•-.1•••:•;•••',3!t••••••••,0,1,••••:•••••(•:, ••••:..••..:.......•••,•••s•••••:•••: •3'•:••:•::-t•r••I•i•i••••••••;"0*.t,,'•';,•-::••'•••'-;.;L;'.,'';•,-11a4.•10.'.!;•4,•.' c'r•;';•t••?•''-p.;':i',•:;;•g.".•;.;;4•;•;;.,,•,;•,•,.•.,;i:,•••);i1';•."•1':-"•••,-•.:,1-';.',...,';;'••,•;4g:•2'„1,':••0E":,'i,v..•,•t••d;i,:,',„.'.,,,i•:•','‘•',;•:',A"t.)••••'3••,•a,f:- r.',u...''-•-'•''•'i'.•..:,•':',,.,,1;,,•''•t.,••..•?,-;t"-:.:•;.•i;;,t',,t,.:'.f..i':.'.f.•:•:4.,.1r17m'04••'4rt"1'•'.'•;1t4;4'As'ci.'4'''1:4%,1:7i;6.•1••./1`...;:;1';.'-.4•.':0••,?i:•t,t 4t..t,4VN;:;i4'i'tIr1y,f!t,,;i"•:;.....•C''•;4•';••'•,.•§',•:?,"14.f•';.'',•4•X;i1t;,;;'••;,••..":;.?-4*t'70•A1•.•l ;f••.,.'';.';.?•'-•„.•'••3"1p:$-,3•'1-144'•.:1',•'•11•,•,'e•:'"ii••4.!,:II•l't•i•q'i.i•:•i-''"1.ir,.4•4.AF•,•rq3,;'1•';r',CJ 4t•r•,••).••"••,•';:•,,i•'••,•;c':e,i!;*p•11•4•10.-•V',,1f,;;'sI1-ieiik 4is';l%!•:I;-..,.,vs44v.1;f41•,'.1.‘i.••.4..‘4•,,•:-;,j:40,;,01,.,1•1€i7',,;'.,,,t4„r:4:e,•„t:ir4itt•,.,rf::,,•t),•' •• ,i..i:-'s'i,''0','1•;o1•S'':'•s•,„.-,'---':!;:,'',,1'.:';.•A'.•.'.;...r".•'.,''•.'"t:!7.I.q5.4'.,.ft./•1Pt"t tv,4.1.i',i•"-'-•-;i•'.t •''VP,. 1,...:,..,4-'•1,...1.•,1'.•A.:.1 ......''. .C.1''''i;''.4411'.',41,‘„t47,,,Nt..47 i•••...*.•el?ic S',PVC1,...+4 • t,,T,V,,'.7:0.v.,ilvis,..-tvor:av&,i+,Vi,,, .ir,40,,,,,,,,,r,...p.. ial:/,'. .f.:•;•;1;11•11i':: ,,..... ki..,'''...•',-... I'.:•at,......-'•...'...4.,r.'%••••••4130:•';;:it.•!Ptit.f.".'••••";•:'ti'..I-4••••:-•4i 'I.:••';.,"4.••"•-•'•irst,t.';,p,f.•4[1,04h:044%,,4 ,4,f,,,O.•rret,-,. ' :1.•,,,,••••,••..P•P-S.'oli:s1.".1-4.oc, ' :114,..,..,,4,1'.44-1,,.0z," .i oral i,..,.4/i•-,,s•-. ;;!..'4,4;,!•;:k1.2.,:.•;?ii"::11','i'•, 4;;;;,tti; '4.0;•.,V.i.t.•!L•V!,,i''t4„.;•••,i•,';':;.',..,..;",',44%•.;.'•••••••,:.•;4tt';',"eu.''. &,...f.';',:;;;'!-.1e,;q;•=4:-.';?•:4'':: 1:.:•f'S•'''.‘i,1:4"04 i lgi,:.,WOitg.tf:ti t '0•,,,‘V;;,t;:i '''"'ir;;•:;•;'-tih5:1411qt-P,;•1'•'",.,"•...,•••,,•4•;•,r.f,,'T.I.?•:•if;),70';',,20;•:••••I'tti,,•Itel:i -. Illi")';.t.i.4 P.ty,:if,fV. '. 1'0('.%`-,,E;:".?•:'.ti,•14•4,tt$.'...'ilit•ei-.gil,t,',;3:','••••,'.,••;:,4'.1•'•Wit;'',/5;t:114-.V',3Y;-•-ei''s•$•; ,;;.?'*•,..'.,!.i't ••'',14..)•••;;;;•;.•‘t'611.;,'62'.'r•f:;,ftr,es,••,,V-054';1'":41%;M:. 4.,', 9.'••':....j,.Mfi•fil.;1•!•;It'i:rt.414'st,i''''.-tigit..•,'''IP;•14-1'-s.:,2.C1,'T',..1;;ift!r..;:4 t; !1,",k•ti''''s7Y.',.';:t.4.'Y'll-; A.V.ki.,•,;;;itr.N.;:•-•••,,,rs••,•••1.,21'.••.•t•••..,••-•'::,••••••-••,'.••••••i''';;••••,, t•••'sgi'l..•••••sto,,i'•:•,,••••••..s.; ••••••.1.••.••it,V•••it •,v°•••••;VI ,t•':•• •••••c',', i :••••••,,...;.,....':;',..J.,'‘.1.';',411',,,f.p."•,:;„,forrk's;::ij:0,....•:,.e.:_A•4:4,1„....,,:71....ci",v.“...iygi• .......i.r:04:....,:•,,r),:•,:41..:i. .,,,..,....,..,.......4,..,..1,y,, , ,...1.,,.,4•;:,,,,).‘v,,,,,...,,,;,.,..„,,..1.,,,ii.A.i,,,,,.i•A•,;';••••).••s....,:s.14',..'i'.V.••; A;•••1,•••'.•1•'.1. .s,1.)d.',.;•:,. /1/...i.1;,-44k,4.q'.,•:. 4,..,...t. ''...t,..e.!••,..;?'..';:,:i.....Q.'{ 4., 1:9•••,;•7•..••fi i.S.S••,,.:•••1,,A;;-,sss,,,,•!:.••Ar'••••••,,f,S.,7•,•;•/.4g;s4:•••••••0.;.: •••.•'' r'e.4.'''•'...,eo t',•-1,11,.t0•.!3N•1=',4•)•••"Mg.0•••••?ii.':•••,q•A.,.'1', i C•Ii..'.'41;;Ta4.47,;•:•.'.7:f.e?4,-,t•akV41:F."W"'.ei'...'•7,,i..:.A1'.,i;.,,,ii.7:•. .. ,.....Aie::,::,....,,:i.,;:,.,:,,.;•„,,,,,,-, '--.,,,,,"', •'‘....,,,11,,, I,A;L-,,,,e,,,•',..--t'•''•,:.,';'''''''''''',..,,.,1•'..'P.',,-‘1.,:"A•• • •,,•!•'••.,-•'.•',l• ? •'••••', '-' ••'''' '• ' .'s.-."••':.•••,-.'•;:-..:1;:.:• ••?•1','•,,ns.i.''''.,',0:'••.%•}6•40.0:??'.t1%0'4.:'64;:±.;',:!!...::...'''r.••e., 1.....fa,.-'' •.: ,•;.1' 1st.:-..,...!;,c,:f:i:',,..1;•-.:';',3,171;,/11',..•,!0•Piqsrp,:•-•.;i:A :',7 :4,?i;";1'••• . ,j;;:t.•--2O"•-;''''',.;•-;f;'-'..,. t•04-.,•-•;:Y'''•••:-,'",•'sq-'i-. -‘s,-.z,'"-AW:k.i•-•;•-'•,-4..,64'; :.•","..3.'.'4!:•1:413•••••:.-.,•"-••"--'• • -.,S-- ' ' ;4•-•••.7.1;•;i;,,,qf...4.ko .•!,,ni. j.11.,,!.4...a.i..,,L.....45.•,.;:,;4',.:,,,y,:.03,1,,.. 4 ,,,.....4;;,,,0....tki,,,.,,,;,..; ..":,,,,,,.•,44,,::sli p,' :.,,,,,,•1:41i;••';'•1;,••••.",';;;X`'..',,1:•,1AN;11••41....'t1 _4-/-.--7 b•-',. ,.,.....0.,,/.4,4;z.,;,.•:,;1•;;;;4.!•1...!;1.,•.••••imi,•,i4is,Its,):::;:g.•^2,;•••,;r4' g 1,1,,k,,-..,,,..•!,.1.,,...,,ii;,:, ••••;.-- ,'Pi,,..,..;,,.'•, '......-v.,,Ay,..1!„Vf,;•,,..,:,,,,.:.•;•,..t%:p.t.,,,•,,,:::,::? • ,,,,....ii,lv..‘,,•:c1•„0 y:.v..-,1,,,,,,•,...1•00,,,.01,...,,twq;;;IN: ,..,, .•:','1,,..•„':,...',, . -.f"P`,,,';•',:•1,..•••,:'1•••ti#•'••••v,:•,,.,••;:it.:•PkWtA.V:rj‘ti,',.:.)...:•.:1. h.....,:: •......,.,..••• • c.,•,,.•..,A.0 A•*'•`•,'•it A•a•lirc•I...V.L II,711',,,•";•'r+11•+%%':•,,,,e..,, • .•,';':•-•','''',',%.' ..1:,'.A..0/•••-.'•ti.,,,104.•:•,?),,,i•iv?,;...,,,,W.:, : -,•••.1.1:PJ"r••••A••• o.• •:-••••:•'•. ;.,i'.,':, . .,,„.. ,,• .....I.^.::,:lp .1:-...: ;L,,,,`.:•:1,,,'1.:44)..",0,'''.1:',.,',' ,- :,',..t''' •"•''''',*''' • 1:1:'4r..1.....'','',..'''ti.•':',ii,.5..eiii,Y.r!,-,',•;:;;',1:.:•,.:.,....:::4?,....,;;Ay...,,,...,:. 1,..•...,--,,-/,,,,,,,,ehr.;•,;•••','••••I^5)..S.•EPL:•V•f:..V.1•••;;.•••;•.."-.0,••••,.!..o.;-.F1 .. : ' !•••,'•:j'.',..,.q.;•*.02:':.,•e;',..,•:,14:ciili-i4;',,,Y r.,tV:•••1'..•;P.,••••'i!.••,..1'......;;P• ••It •••;::1•••••.:....7•••:.-;•:•:::•';'r . DUPLICATE RECEIPT .DUPLICATE RECEIPT .7,'.,>,:.i.1:.',..,....,,;'•'•::::,-A 1'' .,6::.,'•‘....'q'•;:,'.1,1:'•:..,`.*q f.,,t';'‘'ji :::::::.---....--7::::=:.,-''''. ••• . • . i'::':;•;...::•:1144:1.z.':;•:'04:,..?,•'-.::...?:.:i..:11.,:',2:',1.4.1,-1.4::.t.c".1,•..;•:,1:,v.:A?Alto; •.•.:', :,:.,. ;-.:.•.,.:,, ,•:•,,,,,v4vs.,1.•:•';,...„••;:rA:f1,..•.p;','S":•:,:1-.',.,•;,)1:4!•"•••.1•••;sz:rsr„.;;;,..,,;•::,:,•;:i .CITY OF RENTON r.:.::....,;.,..9:„;•:;,....v,:i;;;') :;.:;,..;•::,,.,;r1.1-.....„.1;;,•,i.,,....7'-,-,t;,'•!,.-',4:-.',...:i,Y V47,: ;ft.,;:::' • :•::•••:'. ,,...,,,,,..t,,i„,.••‘1,-,,,,:, i,,,,..1•,.......47:•:.:'V,Nr-i•r!:?..1.,..:s.v9r.A.frs:•,s•-rs, •;;;;.•!;;••.•'si:".•.';','-'.,•,r's• 'V r",,tri:ss•:;'.4.P•i';'';' ;'••••:•••,':ZN•i;',.'s•:•,;4•,-,1, ti.1;;';'•••:ft:'lii;:•••."•i:t':''.'1'•••••K.i,;U:t. .,;4'•';?;•::';:.•;;...t.q.:.••;.4.••,..1,•:,t..••,.0 -.,tiz,....i,,.,._. ,. .,„..... ',i,J.,:g.4.,,,,,,,,•-•,•, ..,-,i1,•f•tit. ,,,,...,:,,i•;,,,, ,.:1,•,,.,:A.-,;.3.:•:•••••,,•„!,5.,„,...,•::,:,,?. • . ••..,.,,...‘......,„/„1,...,..,,,....„....a.,.....,.....,.......:,,,,.:„:„ .,,, ci.,., ... ..:7.,.:.....: ,..,...,..,;,,,;,,,,,,,.,.,...,,,,,,,,,i.1,,,,,•,,,,,i„,?•:„..:...:,:t7.•:v,...,-....,f,:ipi.,„,:::% . i..,....„:•..:c•,,,..„..:•,,,,..„..:5,„ ,:::•,-„„.nvi...::),•::.„..„-•v,.:,•"'•61;''Jr • •'-'-,"- '•'•"' • ' il,'41•7:',,...i;..';'.... .1i, k11./$s•- i''s,•:•/•..:!;41:'•,;,'''';"•:c,'•;:i."•::.:',•z:.;;;;!.;:i,:•'•,`,.•,', 1-1 F;*i.;"e.•••4•1;,•••..1•'....'.72,•''.:•,',r,.i.i'•,A.‘,Wil.s;,,,,'•••••;0'..'";:sir;•"4,.:::it,.;•,',..•.. •..,,,•,,i,,..• ..• ..,'„ . C I TY TREASURER ;';'Lii'I)'1•'i-:'''',f?'.t,;••''•r;70•.:-'',,'4,,.i0':1,',:1'i:s l'.l.•:1•;t':•'v,,i‘:,.t'...'1.,•.-,.,7.•..--.'-'.‘.'.''.!,..':"T..;.•;•*.-t.,•..i'•.•.:i•..i:4•,.';.-'4'.4'':.'.:•':','s',.;;'.:.t.'.,.'1.c..,k.?:f..A•*l,'-j.;i'p;-4"'".•.',;•i'''.0.P4'00.1'e4,,:.-1.V•,i''?i,1...0`.;,,..',A';.N,,.•,'?1P,.,0.'"/.;;''••'.:,'.•*,.•,'•:.1.'.•,;•i.1..4':.;•',:•;.;...:,:•‘•..t,'•,4i'•'.4F%'V•.'?;'‘..1c•:'-.-";r••,',...,;.,'i,'•'';;('',,,!','.,,....;•',.4?•'..!:•;?'..,•'-...,,':.-,.•.;..:'-.••,;"';:.•",1.%••:•.?,4'•..`.':.4'k,,‘.H'.:•:",.h•7Z4?'1 IiZt•l.s0,i,ts.icXtt-',l'•,f•:tl.;::.l.'..:,..''.•,:'.•:'l....,,;,,"l:.-4•4..'.,1;7•, RC EAGSH/RI CE1PR 2T -I 0D 7:11 -A198 9 11:2=3 02-0:3644 == AMOUNT . === . 0i••',•t0.:;...;•!;•...':'•...•::..•..,,C.•„•:s,,•'i:',•.•:1','.r2,-'4.•V•t•6.f::i:t•r:1:4,;.4,•;11.;,0..•.,..'‘;:Is,,.o.k,,../',,.•:.••••..,,1:•'•4•'.:.,.'-••;,.,,•...•,",•;,„t'•,•..•-•••:t:;;,F.'•A:':s•,:%,'‘.,.•,f;A,:.t,-.t,M:,V.-,o.„../,4.1.Y:.i,;t:.:.:,..r:,1,:,„4•.,.1.-.!:t,;',',",,,,11...,'4.,.....:'"i::1-,:l.t.•..11,i,‘:4"J"..:,.7,3'•4.,'1',...1.A,::;'•4,:5;"!::,s1?•-.?,,.•,'..i,•1•,.:;r.•:ei•,r,,,-.,:i-4.;..„,.;...;-!.,'•.,,:N4,.,,',$::•,)!-.*.ii.,..i.:•;.•.1•r-:•,•i•.?::`,...,A.;',••,%•,,i,•.,.,,-.3,r,,i..f.4-;:1,,.••.,- .1 4f: ...,'..,::..'";'..,',".-..X,....".,-.,.,•':;:.-,•,.•,"-:.•-.••.•:,„•'•,.'..'•, :....''•:•'*•.• •, ,•- $852.00 ;•!•;•0:,.J..,•;,..,,:::':::::),;'41..*e.,..:*••••!:::-:•,-4;'••:4.1"•;,.•.,;•;:,1,TP;4,,.,..,..,7 k.•?• :';;;;-;',.:.:',.r,T,I,.. ..,,,I,.;.4,.:1;.,',f&:,",Y,;•.;?,4',:,;:,ii.*:',.;:::;:i';;'Y,.;;.''.'1,.. ,1:4, ji.7.*;:.:*;.1'''';',‘:i.•••:''• ..71-..4,v,..,,,,.....„,.......,, ,, ko.•;,:;;;J••;•,-;:iy..4•,,I.;,;•;.,:.:,.,:,.:bc.i,:,•:.,,...,.,q 8 1-j 00 MIS; E L L A NE 0 US REVE V,;!,*;:i'. . .t...;....'ff:NY'30i:'..6.P.'i•X'-',1*;01::::•'...;•ia**.fa,f. 'i.e, -,j.ly,;;;;;.:,'•*••.::,.;:;',.;\.. .';'.„... ..ifi'•:(,....ili:.,i'''''''.'i `'4.'4gict.,,''0.-1.IN' '1'''','-''19'40*•:''''ir•*'.'i c;I IF PLAN AP P R 0 V AL . 1.......:,,,,,,,1 P•q..,-.F.,,,,,,Ifr,••e:+i.4..,4cre.),..4,....,,;;.-..,.,,,•'::;;T,6 . ••=44:4: •:•-•.'••••.:4,,)‘;.61, ,,,,7:,..,..,•R,p,,,I,.4!...,,;,,IY7,:l.,••:',•;;',i, - 1 nn nn 01)00 • . !.......:-.:!,:•:k•:.-s,liviir-x,..,,i.,z f'..!,i''„e4,1".1.Vii;M:••••••••';'•••':,',.,•...:(1,,..1• S.3 4-1-,1:q,.:•••••:'k.'.'t. '..f:A'5,40.1••••1"..•,t•X.Itti•Ii ii,•'•'''.,,-."4,•••••r;t•kit.fl'•:. si":,.••;',•;41.:WI ,,ON••00•00C•--•''* .. $2.00 . ...;., :k.4'-•• -'4t.r, r.r.4.01:;'...;'••,Pt:'..44i';',n ..:,.‘‘..• • •.%•, .,,,,,,:.:;...k.:,,,:.r.p.„:,..,,...,'•,;,%:.,::t+';!..;,i'',fi 4h.71;Ct...;::''). 81100 MISCELLANEOUS REVE. ) . , iti.•'64.:11..t:Ot.,,,'!•'kt,:'l,1,...1 'ik„..A.,,...tt,t,,,,k,T...1•:,:),.*?,.:,,--Alr.lr'?".: . :1•,•••,,„„••i,,,....,••,, 4'* *''''1 k ' ''''"l''.1A4,''''''''':i4jOiCI\:•1' F.051 AGE • rste.•;14.,:.,F,ir.•,.,:::P-„(44'i'...,..c.r4.1.k,..gglf.,' b; .1,....;;•'.,;:.•:4•;•'..f.,i•-• '2:ii•:,:.-..,.,...':.•,;;;.; . ,•,.•.,...... ..„f..t.„.0.,,•,..„4,,,,,,,.e,,•,:,.....v.o,i'.,,,,.:).3.,-•:..4::,":.: r..- 5;V:....,•,,,•,r,".2.,..,." .4.4',--.."::t,•41.,&t4,:. - ii..4::,,,,r.,...,•,: 11:',....ir.;•..IN./:••••.-J it'. IWO 00.AO.0000 1,,t, •,'..;:v•'•':.i..Pi..:,:.:,'!..cliAq...1,:,.:41,4A-.1.4:-",,:.1,,cA.::,ii:JNI 41;V1k41"1111NAg°1'"i '71'il.'''' .1.-11--1°J-1°----- - - REVE $213.00 ''''''';',4141''''''';''''''";..ilt''' .it.-•••#Ail''.5,...:10;',.*:'::;t4..•gfic,`;'.:**,41 8000. MISCELLANEOUS 1 Q.i.,.......1.-...A.,•,:,:,•:,...4,,,,,p,,,,,,,;,;.,.;pi,,,,••,,,,,..',,,,,,-,,,.....,:i,,,,,-;,,, ,• •,,,,,,:;••:, . ...':::, ' It,:...-...t•r?,.,;:..41,?..,•'•::::•cii,,,„"i-,4:•.,:,s.•'. .;:,.!;s1‘;',.?!.. ,'...%•.'t',.1!:t.".;i'il.,'''.. ' ;7•':..t.,.. ' ::fr,';'.•• Y''.-:••••,11C••?•t.'.•',".1:P;',t"ff.,:i;',....."."'"44;..i.4;••'f!"',i",.'..,?;:t••,‘:::,"4'Itt.", ,ti' ...,?..,, '.:,: ••,i;,_."., .4..vf'51:Ii•':4,•'(::•:1-•':-Kii,4 ' '',W•;V,',):.'143:447',•!,1,1rtgt';:".•:..ftl ENV. REVIEW . __ .,__ ;:ifr',.,,,...!,,:.r,f't: •**•-'..i,•.1,;.':', ..-6i;;..4.,.....,4,.ie.:i'..,...'. nnn nn nnn.00.umuyu •q .•-,.4,....,.,.•,,:-.i..,.,.:-g:::,v;.•,,,,:,-,-,,,,,I.y;:,,.....,-,..,:.,,...,,,., . ,,,-•.•,,.,,,..•;.,...,,.. •,V,I".;A'..f....,..."*,';;;F:',',..,;••60VC...., ....'.4r!;•V:4'.1.:4.1;r.,..:::?.01 •7 --•--•---• .---_-- ,,,I.i,..,•.,..:1„.....f,t.".,Yr•Yr•V,.±)1.5i,'..,1:4,...!:,:. ;,....,...,,,,,,,,t;•',„,1`4",‘ •••'. ,••‘..1,"....-,..-•.,...:s - •,..,••.,-/•,',,•,•-••::,4, ; ..,,•vs.',4,.';•••,•4.'..,,,,,c,',,,P.•,`ei!1:!..1;'rt..' $1 P067.00 ,• 'V.41:.•••r.,s'":•.-'0*-fY•isi'•••,14:,,-.....4,••••3•0.-'s!.."1-:'4-'il.:1$4,-st‘.r.•T i.,...r.•••,:..:.: ••• l'..t...,:•ii,.,.,•4•':;'r.....:;;•.:1;j:‘,`. .:,f,'•;11:1.:1:::,•'..f,•.::../.•';;•,4.;•i...:!,4),-.1.i .4.,..:. •', ,.,.:;.:•..',';'•.•• . -..",;;;,•:••'s•!,.;'s,r• , •;" e•4•.5C',.'•:';••.4.•••''.,.i;•.•-...;;',".Q•74.'4;•••••,"6 TOTAL. IMJE .. • .• •,e...,...,,,,,,,,,,, .,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ••......,.. ..•,-,::- ?,,,,Ii.,,,,;:;,-...:,,,-,,,,,,•,:...:•::,.,•,•, .4,,,(1-„!..;,..,.41,.44y,...•.•, ,.7,k,..,13.1 . ?''' '''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''':'''''' ''l RECEIVED FROM: • 1.„:„.i....4.4.1,••:.'•••..:;,“,••••,..,3•ts..,• ... 1<;';,ie,r:',.'•.1;1/7'.:4•i-Ii`7•.-.1•••4••••• •Cfft••':-....:1:1"•:'‘ ;•' " . '',4,1•`:,:C.;;6::.•:::::::'... '7". '•''?".11 . '6":::: •k•fS41.:'.....?;i, DE fill I S R I EBE 1.,1V r:.:.'....,..'V,...,.4.,;,i'•,j,.,,,, i.!..4•'-,,,..,..•. '.:'.7.•..• r'In.'• s••,.'. .:‘...1...,,,..4:u+,:,..4.•;,,:••:).•••::,..1.•..-:::::::2:4...91,. .,..i......'; • ...":.'."., f :-''.1,::!",d ::::::',1::' ' `cCi'.'-••'''.';,'%:'4W4';::"'.1` ''',•';..h.7.r.:::.1.',r:•,..!.Q".• •,•::•.,--:; c:',,•• .... ;'...,...':.;,..,‘.':. • .., .: •- • v,...,....,...11,,,3,,,,,,,,...,..f.,fr;.:1.:4(?•••.-47:".1.0....k•.•;,.,'..;-,•"•,:.:•.•;V:•••'•„4,1...,1.,.,, •,,.....L ..Y.,.TA f'...11....•",‘',i'''t?-,', 'Ai.',I.,,'!".0:',:r'Al.,..,,!.,t'i'-':41,02?..*At'i,.:.•,.3., CI•1 E C..K i..‘:•. .,,:;,;'';Ci•rtk;•,'•7::::s•!ifrri•l;'.•;:••••:.;••`.,`,,,ri'X.:1.:;:•.i:..-('..',ii,".t'.•:•','''••••:';';•'-•'-r'”n',-.,....' ,••...: :,:i:i:4,j ',--;','•-.7;•:Y.1:-A i,,•,,.if',.a,3-i:,•;':;?..';it'..,,,i.;''';t.';',,,,N,,,.t.':-.•'sift' 41).067.130 -.......,„-i yr4,,,,,,,,,N,...;.Iv',,c,Ls.....7115.,;:a•,1„.....;•%:",.p.;•,..'..,.'......,.,t, i•,:c..1., .,• , ,',':;...•.,•• ,..,,...;:,,,,!4,4..•.,..;.r.•,,,:4',...5,„2,'5,,,,ez.ik..'''...f..,5 Z..,:,....,,:!,;;•4,•,.",,o•..1.t.31 $1,067.00 4,,,,,•„1.d.....,,,•,,,,,q,,,,, ....:;',.. ,$.4•:•••,.•:.1,,,t,,,,,,,...,...,,,., TOTAL TENDERED .1*',.`!*.',........;'iy;;;:.4.:'"Pi.,*:.'t:1,11V,...):rica0.'.:z4.;.'164sti 'i'•i.i....4 :t.,;_',,T., ,• •^,;::::::......; ;.;..... ,•1'6,4 ''41"t'it r,,,..i.':•1'"i•;:.'7 "J'Illi2t.'.1 ..:; ,"•,,.tjb,7,13..!.t.',?; ":g: ,,,,:::1::.•;:":i-1.‘,•.1•Ti.1.3/.' 'S•;'.',..,!,::r.•,..T"•:'3''....ti''.,54.A s„ 1",;/.1;.$,,,;.,• ''.•."..",•••...':.;;),.117,0;•,.,I.,,-;. . •.;,••;,,,!!!,•'•-••••.-7.,..•:.s To‘s•/01:4"..,•.•••P'..',.:4,?..,..,••''..fs•b'xt..',..,.':,;'1 "• $O.00 -r ...--;..,$' V ; ;',•; '...f'4-,k4.!!?..12,•!';i;,:,:1:11;,'?„;:,,:,ti:. .'.,'•-•t•'•;',,t1';‘!: .•'''3::::,','-','-'r-•{:',o•••,',":..:.•,,j,!'....1 i F.;„,..!,/,..4?,.i.,•;,,,.,.,t4, CHANGE. DUE :•.,::y...,,:,!..i::.,..••••?„,,,,,-.;..•• .I, D4•,,'..•,•••,-.1•;,ri,',frl'a;•:.••;•,(;',13.•...0..,......i4 R';':-.%:;;C;s14;;Iilf:';')5..•!'2,.;'•,,,';•!','Y'Aq!,-*.V4..0i'.,f4;',1.;''i'L.'' '',...i. ff:tA‘.,;':,?..?.;.:::•;.•%:,.'1...;.;', '-•... 'i:'..'. .7e•••.„,'...,,,.'‘;'41,1:, '.....!!).;.',,,'.•';7'.••".:1•";i'i'0'.1•1:4 :•':S .<'ili:',:l.i.tj/r•:•-•','•'i:i`.:A •4 f:).,J.,...1.,•:„.•:.• k•h's,:!y.,,r..,..;.4,A,,,I6...t.,.:,...,. . ::,::.- .. • ,::: • ..,,.c. . ,,v.„,„,. :-..„, . ,•,...,..,,/•,..--:.,,,,f:„...:4,14,:!,,,:.,• .,••••••- .• -, ,,,....,...,.!.„,..‘,„,:.,,,v..,,,•,..,,;.„,..;•}„,..,„•„,,....,,........„.............,...,:.p.A"1.••i•••.•' :•.• •-•-.• ''. •!.•,-;•••;••Nj;•!•,,,";.;•"':.,:..LI 14.yi.,!:.,7,51..."01 II.9 !.,, .',...::‘,:y;.•;!:',..`: y.;'..,.,..':::' ••.''' •• '4.:..:',.1" ;•r•iAt••3.4M4-0,1.4.4.144,t•!.?S")•••t.:..e'••.'.. .,:,, ••11 ,g,•;,•... '•,••••:' . • . 'C'.!;j.i."2,1;:j;.1,.''..i::;....:,„?...;,..,;i'.4,4t;.•.:•,.. .',1:',..:,,:-,),:,,Z,..'...t•..!.i'....j/.7:c:'•11,1;:;•,....•, •1:.1,,trl.-. ,' ,..'•:'•.''''.:1•1,,',F.I DUI-'1-I CATE RECEIF.T DUPLICATE RECEIPT :,?.p.....:.;•,,,.:-:::,,...,,4:!',,'x '•:,,‘...,:'.,.A.1-4,-;•,,:qvfkpA...i.:•%V.ii ' . . ,...•• 1.,,,..,,,,...:..,..,1,,,,.....1,„:,,,.,,,,,.„.,;,..,;.,..,,:..,„.„?,. ,.,::::.;:,1.• ,:3A: '-,..A.Lt`..-..ii‘....,.,f-.V.,.:1.1,:0.;',..,t, •..-.`",,,, - , • t"1.7•„;,!,•t i''.;•,,t.,.•.`•,,,,:t.u,',,,,,,44.3;.„,,,,„„,...•i..e".•,..1.1t,...•I'lf,i,'..„4.•,#,t.......'•.• '•,,'' : , '"":.':"''f.''.. :',''.V.V "q...e•,,i: t.f,''',1.'4".T7..i.;•.....'...t.:i(.•'' i V•s•••A';':.:.: ',.::I: • " ...„,•,,,t...../1.,,,, ,7•••Tcol...,..4••• -•,.,-,,....••,,..p.t,...:•,•••.;,;;•-‘•:.o...:,--;s1 ' . . .,fi .,)•:.........1%.),...14 • • ' . ••••• •.•-',,...•:);.•,.-...:".....:•?1,4•,,t.,r,„;?,4,-;.;,.h,;..;•.,4:r.....J...t.;,..i........e,,;...r.. ..,....14.,:.„..;•• ..,,:.:.,. )r.i.*.•....:..r:•,..,.,:-,:..,y,,c' t :.....i..."...::I r.,:•••-4.:,'i::•I::.'••t,-i'-'1".•''.'•1: • • • . . h;'2.-i'',";;Itiri,;::/:•••"•;••t'I.0••••.--s•;•••:•••'!',•-•:•••:•-•f•i,.•s•-•••..,•*•':-$:::.1:.%!1,-••••••1•.1;•4,-.•• '' s•!,•:• . k.4,!:2,..,"r.,'.. ..P ",%r':"4:•.:', '''-”i•-:"-i'qtM.,:,' .• • k•s'.....'•';.!•'•.•,f;•;;•'..,f,'1,;;;V;;,..it'?<•••, -,3•41;,7i,•4';;;;:fl!...:h;:1'i..•!,.s.1".";••'tro't,'''-'1';','''';',•.'''::-'-'.• i,.•;""•!::••••...• ,.11.1 , !•:••‘,14.i.„•,,,,,;,:.,....0,.,,,•,,,,..,...1 • ••. 1,..,,..,....,::•••:,ts,;,\5...,,,.,:c:,•1,:.,;.?:t...,:;,(1.•‘.)..,,,,,,v,,,;?i,..;',.:-:.11, •' :2::'-'1';':!.;:rt.'!:;•-'4f......f,•::-• ....;',•'•• .• •:•'',"•:,•,.'s,..',;;..:-.:•.•:.•.'i;- : `4.-e.:•-• :::;:'.".',3',.:/,‘1„.!.'..,..•,:..„-1,.:ver,,,‘4.••........,,yii.1 • • • :,,.;?:•:,1.:,:;.,:.•?,,',J.:::••-,1:5,•,fg.4,:i!".;%.;•?.,..,,,:,.;:411,;-,..0!..•:-ri.:1'ii:•Aki...;',1 • ,,4!.••.„4 l'A.I 's-Vki,•1'.5,,,•.' I•...'1...' • ...a...t,l''I• 4 •;:::..!..1•,/.,.,.,•:::,,..., ..,,,,,4,!,..,,,,„4,..,..-1,0p,,vp.t .11"4,..ler..0.1.11ccr F.,1.114.4...*..f;S:i',..;:' Ru-v.:1'‘v2i1"V:4:7;:.:14•I'fi.:.;Gi'.\5ct,,,,..f.0131',...' '•wy..'k`,...v,'?..1',..i.i'..:.s:P.:C.,0c7.3'.'•;j:;;,141.:11.x.'';i::ie.:.;i1:3;.',4:"§1.4!•'.i':?;;::::,,lir';':;.;.,:::'.`:'.-';;;:::...5.;;;'.4".''',1',.V. ....'•1:..;,1:,,,.,..',',.. ......‘••,'„•,..:: ;',!.,;iP.;i'!4:i•c•:::, •‘.':'.':'.1'4,4 A‘,,,,-,-10, .. ,,I,'•,..t.:',,,,i,":.' ''•;'..r!!.....::':',,,t.t,:$'4,...:4;i••,(qF.t.;,..!:1•41':::-.t0',•;.."--•:::::',.•1.,:s.i.;;;.':;3..1'•';',icd. !1,, .!--ir.,,,:::,1;..'1.•',,..: ' '-',4...i..`•(......:'..:!`lti.e.'Y-...,i!"::,"5?.-...1.-'0:4-::..':1"•fitt,rP,•1'”I'!'41(!i':t'n•':';'A V''''',:";."I't.' ren,141.,te .''''t t:/•14.7(.4.1',..,41 k••;..:P;.1-:,;;;0 i,.'•,.,?:;,,,,';',,,,,!sv4,44,!,,,:,1•,.ii",14,,10.;' ,,:, ,e,‘1,;.:..?..:.,g.m,,,':•.:•,"...,,:sV.• '.1 ,','. •‘•;‘,..:'. .....'...: .. . ,:,,!',..i1-.;'',.:•:;.:i,",lb'•,'t.'1 r,,i.'',;,' N.?....;.),4•;.:40di.i''.1...tPkiAP'2'4`•"•i'•':';''''44 '•''''''•C'il 'it):<4.:,'!•.,, . ' •... V4;..,';%':,1,:::Or '.c'hl''' '.:4,;(% .4i.',''ti:•':'..'::- P.A`. .... ';:.;',,i.••,..:','-',.,•,'.;;;4.•,1,%'il7'...":',4•'••,;.',.,':;.J:.'i-;;,:f'...'..,,,,'. /.-,';', ...:•:!:..-'.,......,:.:..,- .,.,•:',&::•Nc,.'P'',',.3.4;i41,... 4v..,,,,o,:.,',,vi.m.,k: ip.;:111.11 :,.1,41:;•.tql-:••:....•-",>.•0,i,.... ...,,* :,4,'',1,ii,';''•:i ,,1/,44,•;,.147e1;.4.1"44,, it;.;I:f„,•14,V.Iii.,•s"..;`;•,)••,?;;;'1•7„.13;;),!..;;`;;:•&;;''.4.:.'iikts';':.;1„•,?,/,•••;.-t.yr?,'•:„t(4.,?!..,';,t,i', ,, .'i'f,'• .4'''.1,.•,.1;"'.1:'.,,,;:.•1.',•.,;;'.!••••. ..''.!,:ill ;?•;;11ts..;,;:',!;‘,k'Y'4 hf,(?.0",?....i...;;,lcit...i",';';...;:,..x.e,tr..,p;,.ti"5,....,4•!?.1tp,ei,...,.i.v....r..'i 1 ir.'91i...y. ....k.iiii:,,rcia..,,,,,.'.1,:'. :0-3,•4•?,i',1,. A0'..1.,I):-.t!'..ki:1434•`,...g4'-':;14.'li•,,:tz*ir'.,i'' ''''!'/A2:.i'''•";,•,.'.,'P•••;•"..,:','Ite, . •''.r.';••:."..'•..;•,j',4"t.'.... .....q,4„ii•,.,, 41.3,.,,.:14„.•,,.+1.,,3,..1.....-,-,,,,ce:,- ..,,,...."r%t;•',:,'.'•6!0.!.*:'•,!,.-.",..4 •'!•;•ii;;;$;>''M.::'•it.f....'1.4.:•,,,,sgr•fl'i•'''.1.•,c's,;•%".',",•'',,:??e•ip;"•'.'••-•4.•;;.;,,i'•.i,'•',.1..let,cy,'','t•';•;,:,;j•V• '..,..W.s.),;4‘)„••1 $ N.;i3,1!?1,0,J;r•L'It.; .'kyso,.-,k,,kigiy..!rv.,,,„.,,,,,,,,,,,,,,k,..,.:.,,,..•.,-N.k,,,,,„.;.:T.,„:,it..?.1.„3:,..,,t,.;,.r,•:„.;.1,...i,•,';:,,,..,,,f,.li.4 ,../...:;:,f„,..'•,..:.,::,.;_t;7 61;4,,r...ik,..:11,04.,'').4 y,lif'11:2'.',47,/.VI:4i.....'.,.•.'tri4...-,,e.:-;'43,,kfei'll'I,At,.t.N:".4„'-4.:.:,1 1 ''''''''Y'n•' • vtA.A*A.:: i'I.';?:•:'•'''1•':''IA.144.':1•4'.;:,":....P.14.1.,-.:k•F-..,•.••,y;:,:l.c,...;•,.:0...4.-k......:,,...,:4.1.1, 1 .....,,,,,...,...,. ,...,•,„..••••,.. ,./.,•„,:.•;/1:,,,..,..,,,,,At,t,,.,,,,,..., ,,,,,y;„•,:ste,.;',.",•.,....4...::_,q •,....:,,,•,,,,..,,,.-,,,,;.....,......„:%.,..,.•:1•4 ,,ti-41•10, t'rl'*;41:5•S:41:i•. -;:'• t'4,...s•;itig.;174:•• ,!„,.ts,4:!:15.1.1'!•:;",':1!'•*!it,'se•,"‘!:••••'';:•ti;:t..,rstf.:•,::..:. 1.P.-,,v.'htfl'.as' li:ir;'f'.•'••t•••••.,• ,•':''•••••-''. ''ke•-`1'1'''','''';'''A,,`;1:••,i'• ;:s1„X•;••;•••••.,,r :',..,;.,..,..6W(..3:',......-4t,'14,..,.4.',,q,•/:•:?:•,:'..?•,,i'..!,,,,:-.. ',,;*'&11'.41:, .,:4/"!4.'4')..-A;'4','...4f,...ki.c77ki:;,..Tri;pr,Af.;.....z.-i,-,-.-Ip.w.,my,4:,-;.,.:?!o•,•,*:r..,:,s,vr;:b.',.,.6.••:..i....,A••:.•,..,..,:ifi.4.0. ;.it..(.......,,;,,-:,..,..-',,,:,.f.... :..f.:•14),.;?•',..-...,,,',.;:e.,6 RI;,41/,e;;,.9,,NR,'„?.....1,....,... I',:,..e,i.,....;(:...,..0.'..,...,.. :.';',...,•`:;:',,,I•fw:i) .•;',14.,..,',0 p. risel;P:‘..'/,',,,..f. .01 . .0i,;, '4 '.::::::4-4t---4'..4-...-:•-•"''f'41:"''''''''''''"z-firl"..-".''''''''' __..:..,4/.IA V,..:'..ekr 1 ^.,,i .?...,,....1.,,,%,,:...S.,.. . v,.•':.••.. ,....„I., , y.;g.,e,..,‘!3....:;'.'::.1'..'i..".•';;,', 141.111i;',6;i4;;5....‘!'t'-.40;i4.1,..'.':-Ipti'AVI.;...1k i:.1.•,:fitli;';•:,1.41,3ifiq.4,••;c•,•::/; itkl&'1'3'";I:A145t4),..1i.'440,4-1 4.;J.4.,'4i:4:41''r';;;.!';;;:i::'.;.,jkliti'•;:l.t:IP.,,i'i.4:,.0:•:;‘ipig.':.C..'S .1:-. ,t,..3.7.:.1.:C;;;•:j".:14..E. ;.,.f".:'.'•:..•::::'..':•:'•.:'..:•,:•...‘ ::.i,,,p.....:‘,15'...A.,..,:r,,,,11:,..7.;,.,...,*,1..k.i,..,::,• ...q.,,kic..,..1.,•,,...1;.:‘,..,.-4,.(1,,,,. ,:::k:IkA44,5•••• .,..,.,• •i.,.:t,,,,,•;...„,,.; 1);,,,,,..r•c.,)'.....,,. ...., '..,....-..,,,,..,4-.,....,,..,...,...,:,•;:„....„,i.„,..f.,...:..:..;,;....,....:;:....-,,.:•:,;,:.1...:2...4,,,,,... -,',1-.•.•;' ,'.,:::,- '''''''''11-'33.'•'1''''''.7.:?‘-'7141.ilei'Ql•'.....:'''''.5:1 •: .:.:t6?'N.::::••‘ -:'1" .•:14:•:''''.:-"..:,.?I'C';';4' Wr.:;;;`•- ' \ll'ini:\r-. 1')•''''ll'-'''A.1‘"t'1.1:1;6.1.1.1i.,•,,...s.:',44.(4,4 1.4,c.r...A.,,,..:-',,v,!,,,:-..•!;•t.. ...i-.; !-;•?:,,...,.....;,..s....-,.:-!,,,L.:...!--.,:.-•,.,..,,..10.4•q!.':-... . ...... . .,';','...,',.,.',.',,„‘i....',„'.1.•••',.;'''',,'::',i':: ,.....,tev,,,..r.,,, •:lc,,t.,,i.,.••:,./......s.,,,,,...t-,.......i‘••*.•,,,,,,::..;,,...!...,,,,..,6,q,;;;;r..., ... .7i,,ipt:,,-.,i,.-kf,,.4c.,;•!;...,:,t),,,,,...,-;;Ise,..:,i.4.t-,,,(,...;:?;,p. .•,:,,.....•...,...,1:•:!,11.,....,,,,,;-•,...,..,:....i..y.r..,,,,..4•.;,.:,..,.;.....,e,,•,..,-,,,,..;•,-,........•,.:..„.t..4,1,....,.....yr.,,,:,,....:., ........:..i.•. ''''•$'•±7.•‘::',';.:4••••1`• :4•%."'-;?•';`•'.'"r.i'ir:•':.....•0• :1:1:•'Y.,'•'`•j.$1.,t;;.'.j;1•?:•:'...i,!‘:.s:7!:; .., .t•.;7,,,;•;''.;.•,.,pe 4,,,•••,',,;',..,;:di'.!•-•'.‘'.•s'!'•V.';'•..';'..4.t..4;t0 Trf• scf:',..";J•..'„,•••/SA.,!,.._,.:;,11.,.r.1:-;;':.•••%.:.•.:4",.r,t1;..,...)„.•...s,„.:.,..,.,,...,",.,:o,„ attig."."..,...,,,i •.,tf...'...,, :7:!..W.r,q'::'••.•!...••,"'•'.7.i, Yjiti,t,..4',',n..:',/.:•;t;'.....t,...i.::'4";:11',,%.%,,,I,'*:•‘;,1t$,.iP."..t••.t.,'...:;',i‘..'"•:.,i;JZ".:;itt '', ..4%;•1314.:2;':., .t3t,2q.ki.1•:'.:1.:1.1'.'t"..JY,'':.cti.t.i,'•,•:10,S;-..i,l,A.1....:i,'.4.•?...•„."1;,t,•4l,•:::,1..;..,%.:1•'..:,,I,";.•.,,•,.'',•:"..,".',•:,:?,,,,',.tfl',..1.••..":,...:.:,":.,"1 .,'„,.•;,.,:::.1,.11 14,1,p,,....,_:: .'.,:,,'....:• 1 ••,::4,..:;;;;,,••,,.11;:t.:i?•-.1,A .1' ',,,4;:".,•",!Y", ‘,t4,iit•.4.';",.;,....,'Z:••',',1:".•l'..,•-lt,If t"'..W;,"1,1::•',"',...•';(....., •„,•I"?.te,..-..,.St,t',Nriti:,,,,,::",t;1;;),,,,A,V.7.,..,trel,...%,1,•.9E1,, ..*•,;''.,:.1.;.'!;••.Si,::"1::.`";....":" tt•."".;?..,t,'•:•• :::;!,•!•ti,•:'. ,,r t,,:!..•.. ,•.i.„.,,,•,...t.:14,}d,:l„r: • • • ,(•,r. ....',.t.:,:,".:1. r!.,:;!..,,:.1.1''"i"Z.(01,:'•-4::!....,.....4:i.Y.7.!.'.:.':A 4•4:''.'..14i,';';'..,...i. ,:i't•,:'•I''''',.•' ,.,'1.••,....::f;.:,••••:'.", i 4,t'.';;.1.•C''',.'S'I•te:';‘,:( •.,ti:',•4q,i .:(..M.41..''.44.:S-::•;'Oh 1‘,.3•',"•, 1.:-.',:2.4.;At'.17 t!"...?!rIct7.1,4,..;%•.?''',,:;/.:::,,:t:ti:,..,.......•:'•';,;'•:,:,•.::%1'.'*3141.'","It.:,,. ..'.,..... t•,,,,,,1/2,i',i ".•:••,',•, ',''! ,'"t'ild.t5,4'.7,'::•;.:'•:,,:flk,.. ,•.„'•,;',..,q1,';',;,•;:t..',' V,,;?..11•:,.:'...;,'.1:':.4.•:;•,'•:,:i•..'2.0. ,f,..(:;;1',....Y.,..:.;"...;:if.ti;',q . .4.!:k5":4"•,' . , f1.7, 1.. ,,,,.1.1.1..1...",."/; ;,,..i;ilie 4;r•?,,a'•';:.:;•:*:V.471....''''i:•'•;.'•;;.'''.',11'4:4'V''. :' . '.'...'. ....,.,,,11 ,.i.,3,..,,il,t!.. :./i,,:i.':''.4i.rc,kile. 'A:1•:•)`, 144'i i•..i'.:''''•:.-''''-).'"'•'d:-!•-•'•f:. :'''',61:.sit;%'.•-:.`S.:';',':;!•``,'4,..:4,6:'',';,,;".‘'i '•;s.'..'• . ,;:q..;..:!;....,•;...,.,,„.,;.,y,;,j,,,,x.,•ii4,;•;•,;;;,,,,,,.....:.,;•...f.•,1:i„•;,...;;,,, ;;;,/..,..,,t,; ;..,....... ..;;,;•,,,,,.:.:•,,,.-.1„ 1),,••-•;.,••:•,.•-•.k.stl.;.tr: •.•,,,,;No,:ri,...g.4-; ',4•,i"•t•';•;•i'.•'t'it"•r'r•w•'';';',.4.{••i.C'1,'•';c:-;;I 11,,L''''•f's1:••.'"'!"` 1 °••••''''.•I'-•.1;•:.;;':•.•-•:•r:42••••'•••"'''''0.' '' '' c'- ''''• i',,-744..•'.•?,:'.;'...,'-'':',•;).:;.,ttI .,•,',,,•y.,),,k.,..5,.;• ,•:,4;.4.1;,.y....)..e.,•,..04,r••••,...4•,e;.•...,;:.•:..!-,r. e , ' .,•,.. ., i.4-,••• ••!, .;•10.i.,.).•;: ,.....1,,,,,•::,•:•..,•,..!•,•,,,:;.,....,;,;,,-,,..,..:i.,,,..-..,..:•.,••••.,,:••••..,....,-.!:..•..viit.:;,+,....• . .• •• ,p,•;••i-i.. .:::.•-.'.,..:I::':;f2M,::-cff.;:i;f:;‘,:)..,Ve,+•:;p',;,!",":4•fA:',;:•'•011.,; ,:!..•'. ''.,......."••,: ..1.h';':',. 3 i* '• :kDt••••1':",4" 24'.!;,: :f i' .rir,..,:;.• 'Skyr`•••:,,..•:•;•.4:1',.,;,;!..'.,,:•...':''.i..t.,1,,'. .i:I4.:••QX-It.'t.'.....•-•','':•,•••',',....!!../,...14-',,i.v?.4;••,''.,. : •,,.:". i.::;.;•:"......:',;•. ilt'3414:tt. a•; •117`.'1:., :::'44‘ '''.‘!" .t..''.d:.i:•-.2'::.':•-14••••i'• V t:Wi.i:::'t.14,i1;44:.%"t.:'' '''.'P.!'..;?'•• '•%;•.'.•'!••?:.'S.f.t;• g••%;''.•:'f"•'.-•:'•';'•:::,',...t.....;..'•'.11.-N;',',.::..:•:,''•: ::.!.•:'• -...1::•''',••••• "..,..:;'..:Ti5V•71;1"t'f'. :'..'•• ..... ' •1;!..''•'•':' :'''''',‘•: ::•.''141'^''';";•''..;'•'t.:.:-•t'Af''''.‘i'.1.".M1:r..'• ..•?•••"'''s:k41... E:.','," ..‘":••••••'‘,'' Vt,' V.:•")1...4 ii•i"t'olel,ft',":.'"e: .,•.;••'' •?,•X:•1.:•..tilt..,•• '• t-i.::.• ...' .-•. ••: ',i"..t.';' ,..•r."•;,•••,,•••••;:trt.':"•'',...:::' ''.'•".. .:'‘•'',"".1,430'-'.1:'- •• :';:: 'f.'IL",!,,t;:',:•:'\..,...•:••::".t,rki3O:1•••t.,,,:t:..,.:::,.,...t...s.:.;,tt',::,A1'..N):.1,",...•:,41....'c‘ii2,,:::...[::•'...:;',...).••;;;•••;',.,1 1):W.4.Z.:,It •?,4!:.ice..'i,.•.,=•.ii2t;i';:','.;iqt. ..-!,,,,),. :,,,..?.,,, .,-,..: .,i,,,,,..,-...,.:,,;,,,,.:....-..,,,,...'‘?"'•:':':''...'''''Mr 4,. i- , - I .....,,..,,,,,,,, .,,,,, ...4.V.'' '1,':;;'1,4•-.!,4.,Ii.-.•fj r.:-'-'1,.:1;.,:•;.,.:••',.'-'... .....-,... • .:,',.,..,:,. :-,,••,.-. .:, • .. .•. VJ,':',4:;',"i.40. .14,1 q .., • •,.y^.•,., r. .... r •••• • • • - • - .'••'...‘ '• ' • ..... ' 71.;•""'•;:; '"''';'"liir.111. ...•.:-V.t.7.t;yi....Y.1.3..11,,.(2'..1..,:,?i.'..:,..(.''...!..1.....''...,..... ..',. .1.•,.; ... .A.„ ,-.•..• .. •..C• ':'' ' .• •.I' . ''.• ",'I.'''.' ..''''''''.. • . r."..' • '•.••.. '' ' '1 '." :.;i::'.2,•;Lil,,...1,;„.:.i•%,.::, , 1 , ....,..:::::A;::,,;,,,17,,;..,,,..,?,..:c.iir:, ;.,,,tske.if..yi',....„. .',::;'.,..;:;.,J.%......, ;',..tiTV:A.......?:,.T::4.5..t!.;•C‘'J...f,V;;:.',,..,.'i..1::-.5,11:;',7,i;„:',.....!:. ....;.,4ttc'z,,'-';.'s;".;-:1';••';'•!•,••: ,...••:.,:•::,•!..,...-•,•,; ';:.•,!.;:;•.'...'••;''':•' ,..:',-;•/:,?....;'4.•'''•"-: : • .i...?T'..:"-:ijii;''..'2,12',!4kr-It!;%.::'.•:;'•::":.;'''AJ'i :'•:','irt.:'::'"?.:;:' ..! ..".Is4.:. ... .::::: 1J. ,•''''IA:k4:trik'',..::•q,'-.'.''.'..: ;gfit:It:.4 ,:.iiit, .: '-',•;.;;t:ai,:.%:;;', ....- :. : ': 4,!;1.'2.1„,!.t..4'42.,':, / '.;•••••••;Fs't..••.!''-';'.1.•;!4'•',1•f:.t.'.-..••••»••,..."i.f.'. ( „;,••••;.'•,-,1.;1:,:;':',-:'•'•s••';:•.'';'"P.• •'1,:Ire:,1'..•.i'' ..t;•ticyt.,s;•i ' 1. . ' ••.• ''•.. '. •.'"'"...... “•.'•--'''••-"'..''''•• .".•''' '''• '.'..s• • .:. .... IV4,1kipt,zi,iltc•112...:..p,!•(.•,,,r.,.,..:,,,,,,,,,,At..•-),,,,,!....c,:t,.....,•.:•.",•••••••••••:,'.,', .‘,41:',.1,1k.t.., •• • ?:.1,....,:i•tri::;:.•:''';•1!rii:.•'',•. ..+;it!:i••;•.•c•;•'•:...•':•:••.Vi..:•‘.'•7;•i;.. ,••''.;•,..',,••••,•,.•,:31:4":1?,,..•..i::,...k:,,±.,!,..:-,t.:;„ 1, ;,..',y,-,•••, •••,.....;',',/,-a,••4:•,„, .,.„..os-•.- ; NI'0..i, ,,,;,..... ,.:‘:,:r:,-s,..,•1,-.•:;••,,.,...;.-•:..,•:::,;•-,..,,:...,,...,......,-,.,•: ••.:,,....1,;• v;...... '•-•'.....;•:-.'f'. '::•:•Y:c.,',. 'i,i'A'r,:,....,'-:•••••,.,.;'.•',..i.'..,';',:::..-........:;":4,,,,`(,.:y.;:,',..:......f;i:;:,:,..,!...:.!.....:;..'"2.,',,:,..,... •..„ ,., ,.....,..,,••:.•• Si .,„,, Fe.?„.„ 41g.,:;.,i..„...,....(,,i;•:,,,'......i,..„.,:i..,,,,/,,,,. ....•• i.,....f.. :-.,--;:.:•:, ....,;•... v.,.. ,,..:; •: .•...;... .: '.''.,•:•.•...,•. • ••••,..y.t.t.w,...,...,,,,.f.,::•.•.:r;.....,..:,:..;y:„. •••••;, •,.,v,.,....•••'.....::?,-,....•..•••,•-••• .:•;,02i4:::•.-.,..,:::-,..::,•,,..i..i -,;;,.:(...i.,'..!?5.0.-,.,,t1•.,•4p.,:i.,:t.‘;.,::,,Ai,- •,.,,,,,i )„!i,...,,!,.... i.....''.. i,,-..1.!-:•:,:,..q..v,,:. ! ...,,,.,...,..:2:...,..•:::..•••,;,-•,41.t.,....... ..:... • ,,,..,•••. . •-•••••t„4";•"4`:s.,;••...'•!, :•:•",')/ ''•..1,41','''')';.", • .i.,-;,.; .•'. •f••••i.;':,.•„;•i:',,,,;.,f,':'••,i"'••f-,?;Y!••••1••:•''.•?..,:;',-,f:•:•••••-•,..;;;,/./,!•73. ;:.;''.••••'' t Wk. ';'.;-•'•...-.'s.••••ts'''',•.:,'.'•%''Y:1;:t••'‘..*:•.:',•.'4•:.,2f i.,.......-::"'.::'',''•-;:.:'..'• 1•14,•,....'. '•'- ' '. . -..".. •''%• ..'';'..;, f,c!L'•'It ',"".•:.'...•:‘'...r.•:•:.,•-: -,':•.,t.:•••6•••••;•‘..t. .`;..' •...-,...:...",'.'•:::-.: -:•7'4''••••',"•,.',Itl'-'-{‘I'i'•';,,,,nr,,,R,, e .,.:1.-"t • ...4•.:..',..t.'•,,t(t,..,l'‘',••.,•:....i...".•••:.,,.:•::•:';''',,.s,,' :.:••.....,.,'.:,•;? .;•.i.,a-.:::: • . ••• ' . ., ;••-•;;:,--,--;;•,,.••• ;;;:',•••;h;e .1...t)::•,'•!;;;:'.:''••'•••,',•::•,!;••;:,-;...i''',..2•••,.,.'2ki.f.ii;•;:.,;..:;;[•,1;:3:;',,i'-....;:.•;;;,;',:":,••;.1,,•) .,•••••:„`•;•it')5Afir.,„:(; ,)........?,.:14••:,!,..!•,•?•: :••,,,,i.,1, :ii •;;",i...;,,...:,rf.,,,.•1' t,,,i••••:,-:..;!;•i'5•,('•.„i.-,,.,';•,t,',ri,-?...,;•;,-...,,,,•:•;•;:':•,:s.;, .,•,•,:1,••.-:;4•,..;:;s.,;,...1.11.M.t.;•.:.;,.. ;.,...; .•;-; . 01 -7.''''',"4.Pil'f*'1'°117Yr''Pra '-'4‘c.'-''''' ';''''''i ;F'.:,'''..'1.' ' ''... .;;•7;.,. ';:',:c•.:•-1. .2.:•!•7'......•. ,,•.!.....:.:....,":::.'7. j'f:2A vt''.'••• ••••• ;'f-, ': ••:...,...,..-...•:...y.,,-.5;.,. .iticiy,,,,,,,...;.:,...,,,..v.:,,,:::...::,,,,,...:3,,;!,,:-A...: ,!....,::...-,::......:,....:).,:......:.....7:,:s.i!..-,.; ...1.•• •.. •., ,,,,•1 •. ., .,... ••t•, ,t.;• •• ..';'• -•!:.:.; :•••:',''.;X:i .:4 Cg.4•4•1:::1-.1',Ct.;;I.":,:.:•:,?'; ',4•*.:•:','. t:,;4-;;;•:.'-...„..•'-(. 0•"? :"•'.i.? ''. ..4 *•,'. 45,1.1.4fi5''' ii'....1;:;i'4''14:....1/'''' '1Ai...;';'s."......i.....1'.."1 :'.5';"k''i",.?•":!. .:-.8•:::,', .4 . .;•ts.".•:.;;"-',.. ..',33,•;;Y.:41." . ',-;.;,.:'"2:*:,,. :•••,:7:,•':' I ,,o ';...-....,1.; :411...,ft;5,.,•:„'";',"•.;‘,X41::::t.": :',..'22,4,5ilsIV,';•!*,ti'-1:1;I:fi2::""slcil,;.-,':.t'f.;....‘.'• '•'.::1;,', •' ,4,,y'i ,V,1'.,1, .1:f.,!1',471 14t4SP.if7:.;•,.,,„ .., ii..:„.;'..,;':.1:c...i,.?„;:f.;1:'1.2.,. .:,•,11•••:,}3..1".iPt,fe,,.?;:tcti'll'ii*,...:',....‘•.".•.',1!.';',..;..':-. t,:;;:dt'll 4:.,„.:;•.t.,....-f,'...•...g.•• .. ft?. t.:•••,t,.,•,' ' ".".'`.."41:14,„••.!',.:•.".....;',":•.•1".•,..,.',;••',.•z•V.7.•:it,:t",,.,.,(sZ,,t,tii.,/, i .$1.,,•...•••,!,..,,.i ...,,, f!.q.. ,..41).4q.,-,,..,„•,riej,,,,,•,!„;:l,,;••'?,,i ,,,>•.‘',:y•-, •:'. .1:7..•,,:,.-•.;}..',...,-,k..--.'ci:',"."."3,,,;•'.'",:-!:..t'-'it:-':1-'2-'',.• ':'..",:c.,Arir,,,T.:"?..!'.:'-..' •-','„ ..,,,,,,...„. . .:.--'„, - .).4,0,-,:-.;--,7;7,,-":)...',-,„',....t„4.f.„:.';,'.'•'.i:,. .'•,•:''--•.',,--../3--.;...;:.'..,''•...,. . I,::•!,.,"-...",,,,..! :,,, 17:::•1",:!,',..?.h.:41,'t,1.,','. 1:711.,''''Q., 1,,.....•••••••:'''7,:••••';'••`"'•.'''''''''''.1'-•••''' •''' -'"''''•'••''' •4 ''''' ':"."'''' ...' .:":. :r'.''...":.,.....t.:,..Yillintl,+,:•: ;,t,•.„.•'illi;:t..::::',''.":,,,,',1.'14:"-•''.t.',. ."::"1.;,4•,.{.i;:!!,'1::Zr.CA^':-;.•.,%•,',...;;',., ,Yi e'ri.•,•i`..7.Z.,...',.:,,fl.4'.fik..;.:,;,,...X.•!,:i.•-;"..rtf:r•is:•,{Ai.;,.4(1!•,104,,, T•t:'',••5t•'":, •••'':''•',.e.•"•t •t.i -,''t•••• ,•••t•t,5 "1%;.'1'. • f t :,•;.:, „..... -•,••,•..t..0.0::•••";.t•F,."...t•',N",t,,t;.,.*:'i.".••,,t'i"0,171 .",'1..ii:,3,'-•'•:•').i••••••f•••4•: •",,••'(..;, 4....ic.:4:;•:-..•zz.,.1,}1;:•,,‘1:•.,.::!..'".'•s',,i,‘;_-1 isl il;'i' 1,0;;t.'••-•••:'- 'P'' -;•;:;•".,‘.Q.•,,',•s;;V:i,,1„'-,"Ti,F;',,;•.`,-;;;,•';'..,:.•.•....";'''.•'-;•••')':'' tt7.ki‘o'i':••••'" ...- •r''.'• -••' •;,,,'...:V,,,,.•;;..:::..J...i; .,..?•'?,t1'.i.%:':',•;:i!i•!...,:;:r.';':::...',•:),"•„*•;i:r.",..:,'X'„..r,..f.0;:.1...•,•:;,;•;.?-,...•.1::..:..•,•;.:;..,:: -A 4...i,',!;•-,'::';.,,;,-.P.:"•',7.tii:,'!Ei.,:$)(,,...ii .1••••,.'eic,..A3,••Xi;,41,1,;;" 'i,.. •••••1.1,.':?.,:Xiie.;..;g';'•''„;•if:•,•,t•;..'-',::/4"6•-; ,'.,•,,I31;,•,':!;:.•),?,:',','::..,•.•':.1.•;;:'::•!,42,1filA,V,k-',A...., . • '',!,.':'.... ,,:•••:.;;:••;..;,':.:`;''...:,:,..'''.:i•-//,.":1;41.'•`:i';',:&•:::'•..'‘'':•.!1;:-.C..1:•-•:••-•'•••ii:;•,',Lii ;:, -f*••' ::,'••••5•1•,'Y',;,i'l‘'..-:•':•':;:'.;•••%;• pfk•-114i.; ...'IP,--q:'2:,./10!",•4.;•-.'-'•••,•;itilt:t;:,`,V2:41••••:'•Vr. .1',i' ...-:','-.,,....4,1•c;k;..q..-/.:i.:',;I:p's.':r.iNi..;:t1K.v•tc:i,..'.i: '.'.;:-.......'i.:,....:.!:,,,....,;.t...,:i,4•:.-,..- 'i '' ,. f .; -- .•••••:••.,..,.h,... N,:),:i.'1.4.;••••••'.1,,•'•:•.':.i':•,,,"•v.v.:,,•':r'•,:::',,i.,'':.:'.,.......',.... •',..:"4: 1.• "..,....!:- '. :A,,,I•::'.', '.I•I'•:;•ti-.1^,t•.''•A;..• '.;."..:s', • •,‘„. • . ••• o•••••••••' •.•o•-••....-••,......•',....•.•••..,•- ••••... X , •..• • . ' ,,,!•.;":,,.• ..,..,.. ,A,.,.s.,,,,s•s...?...„,,,,...., ..• ..,..,..,,..-,,,,,,.0,.•,,4,...••••• ..••• •• .,• ?Acp.;;;s!..,:.:•:o.,,p..'Ait Ns.s',.0.,:e4 s•,1-..••4 i;.;•f'411• :.••:-••••••••e Af,o •••....•1•;••-0".•,••: •:'-•, -11-1,„..s.'s...,,,s,.1.:::•:: •• ... .,, •,,..0.;;,,,,!,••• • t......,!,:,-,•.-,•;.',,,.:y„..,...,...,,,,,....:,.....,,,......,:,:-:.4.1f,,,,.,-.,,,,,,,,..:,..-!.,;:,,.,..., ..r'•'•'". '1Ait:0••,l'A•••'. SV.,`A.',•., ••••s';4:•"-'.-:•" !!-:s-.Y.'',:',.: ••• •••••:' :.•I";•f,, •' ;•••;••'• ,'''"..?••;• •••. ••• 1' ' •••; ''-•C•',,,i. .-,i,i,:;,..,:r..-.6 L.--.4,g...vi.:•,,.'.. ...,,P,,,!,:,.... .......:,..,17,h,..,.•,.r..1.:,,',;:i....;3:;!:. :,....-•:'..4., ,`„.. ...,..t-...,i.:..-.,,v.,..7•‘.4.:......,.:,!.,.;:.. ..-t,,,i(‘-‘,..,!;•1.,.:,..,.::.,;;,7,...;;1,,,.; •,.. .:.:, .•...,,,,•....•.;,,,:,..ts, .%•, ,. .., ....,p.4.,, • .":.••••'-'s•-:.,•,,:•••v;t::..),,',k•.',-iz;.•':',.,".;.,.'i:..'..•-•'.f...://,-.'..:;.: •••.;x,..,:...,..,..7e.../.. •-.1.:..,•kil:•‘i.-..i...,) ....,/,',1...,.•* , .s --,...,-,:,......,•:•1..... •;A 11 .9.70 ......- -.-..,...11•, ,-:-1.',.' ..••::'•.3',:• ".--': '.' '• .': '• ..,..,.. .'r....; • :.•••..11;; ;''',.'4•':if•I'..--:.:,'....:1'.;•':.-s,': ..-ft,,;.';:e :•,,z',''.::',- •.,;'',....-:• • "':, .....:,'1: '; i.l.';'',..f,"e; v•4, . ; :• , '• -”- '• -.VII - . „. • . ... .