Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
LUA90-069
GRAPHIC SCALE ER 1" = 50' ,�/ p' 25' 50'- 75' 100' ___.--....__f_.--7-----------11 7.---. /V . * N I li . i I Q '�, N I Q 4 E 'I- I O in 4 A > . .. E - - E I I P rl 4 IL I �._ BUILDING E I • E NEW PAVEMENT TO BE ADDED ��� , .;� \\N If L J . 4 A I 4 E 4 w F • 71 E BUILDING o • + WALK L ; 4• • '•••I'•...:•...: JI( • GI E 4 E E E 4 4 • • • -4 E rryy .Q— FIRE LANE - . " 4 4 4 E 4' 4 E 4 E. 4 6 4 4 E E _ _ _ _ _ a 0 - 4 4 E 6 E E 4 E F4 E E E 4 GE 4 'E' F E PARKING n 14 4 4 4 4 E E E E E 4 0 E E F E E 4 4 E .E 4 4 E SIDEWALK E E E, E E, 4 44 4 E 4 4 �` E E n F 4 4 4 V_ 4 E 4 4 4 4 4 * 4 E 44 44 F 4 'E' 4 4 E 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 E E E �`' 4 4 ,E E 4 4 4 4 4 E 4 E 4 4 E F E 4 E E 4 4 F 4 4 4.4 4�' E E E 'E �` E 4. F 4 E E 4 E 4 E 4 �`' E 4 4 444 E 4 _444 E F 4 E E E 4 - E FIRE ACCESS ONLY NE. 4th .ST. V G imam • OMw IDilr� t-7 YUHL & ASSOCIATES r� r7 '' - RENTON VOCATIONAL. RENTON SCHOOL DIST. #403 Ec:j 1 11_ LI r ' : . TECHNICAL INSTITUTE 435 MAIN AVE. S. 12828 NORTHUP WAY ,. 3000 NE. BELLEVUE 98005 '-.•4th RENTON. WA.RENTON. WA. 641-2886 ) ' (206)641-2886 FAX(206)861-0609 YUHL & 12828 NORTHUP WAY ASSOCIATES BELLEVUE,WA 98005 pu,;+ ,d1 fist Cq October 23, 1991 RENTW 2,,01991 City of Renton Li 0'j0 Department of Planning/Building/Public Works 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 : Attn: Mark Pywell Re: RVTI Dear Mark: Attached are eight copies of the Landscape Plan which provides for landscaping along the South side of; the existing driveway. The objective,of the plant materials specified is: 1. Provide shrubs which will grow to a height of 4 to 6 ft. 2. Provide shrubs which are suitable for sunny locations and in well drained spots. (Although the' lawn areas are ppri:nklered, irrigation needs are controlled by the lawn, not the higher water needs of many shrubs.) 3. Not have such a high value that they are stolen. We selected four different plant materials in order to provide a varying plant look throughout the seasons. The purpose is to! screen much of the street view of the parked cars along the new driveway. Note that we did not provide for a taller and solid screen as we believe that screening thiis area from a public street could increase the frequency of assaults. Please review and approve. Sinc11errryyely�� yours, rl Michael H. Yu , iP.E.. Enclosures as Stated cc: John Pozzaga with 1 copy of plan i MHY:c • \\I (206)641-2886 FAX(206)861-0609 YUHL & 12828 NORTHUP WAY ASSOCIATES BELLEVUE,WA 98005 t� DIVIS6® September 20, 1991 PLA v!1'Y t}r3 ��' 04� sEP 2 49 � City of Renton CEN E 200 Mill Ave. South Renton, WA 98055 Attn: Mark, Py weii Re: RVTI Parking Lot Addition Dear Mark: I responded to your letter of July 30, 1991 by my letter of August 6, 1991 re the placement of landscaping. In that letter, I indicated that we would be starting this design in the middle of September. I just was informed by the School District that they no longer control RVTI. It was taken over by the State! I would suggest that you contact RVTI directly about this matter and presumably after;this "takeover" settles out, there should be someone who can respond to completing the work. Sincerely yours, Michael H Yuh!,.P.F. cc: Renton Schoo l District Attn: Rick Stracke MHY:c (206)641-2886 FAX(206)861-0609 YUHL & 12828 NORTHUP WAY ASSOCIATES BELLEVUE,WA 98005 PLANNING DIVISION CITY 01-H�.WTON August 6, 1991 AUG - 8 1991 City of Renton RECEN ED 200 Mill Ave. So.: Renton, WA 98055 Attn: Mark Pywell Re: Your Letter of July 30, 1991 - RVTI Parking Lot Addition Dear Mark: I am over-committed in time through the middle of September as most of my clients are trying to get projects constructed before school or wet weather. The RVTI 4th Street landscaping will have to wit until I can complete these tasks that I am already contractually committed to do. Also, I prefer that:planting occur in the fall to reduce losses due to imperfect watering of newly transplanted material. Sincerely yours, nl" Michael H. Yuhl, ,P.E. cc: Renton School District Attn: Rick Stracke MHY:c . CITI JF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works Department Earl Clymer, Mayor Lynn Guttman,Administrator July 30, 1991 Michael Yuhl Yuhl&Associates 12828 Northup Way, Suite 300 Bellevue,WA 98005 SUBJECT: RVTI Parking Lot Addition ECF;SA-069-90 Dear Mr.Yuhl: On August 1, 1990, the Environmental. Review Committee issued a Determination of Non-Significance - Mitigated for the project referenced above. A condition of the DNS - Mitgated was that a landscape plan would be submitted prior to the final site plan approval. At this_time we still have not received a landscape plan for this project nor has the City issued a land use approval for this project. The main concern of staff was that a landscape buffer be placed between the new parking spaces and NE 4th Street. In the past we had already agreed that landscaping would not be required within the existing parking lot as it is used as a motorcycle training course. Please let me know when you will be able to submit the required landscape plan. I would appreciate receiving the landscape plan prior to August 23rd so that we can complete this case file. • It is my understanding that these spaces were constructed when the existing lot was resurfaced. You should be aware that until a final site plan approval is issued,the parking spaces should not be used. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact me at 235-2550. Sincerely, /d/1-7j,e) Mark R. Pywel Project Mana er 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 rA • K;'=3 CITY , OF RENTON Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Earl Clymer, Mayor Lynn Guttmann, Administrator • November 21, 1990 Michael Yuhl V Yuhl &Associates 12828 Northup Way, Suite 300 Bellevue,WA 98005 SUBJECT: RVTI Parking Lot Addition ECF;SA-069-90 Dear Mr.Yuhl: On August 1, 1990, the Environmental Review Committee Issued a Determination of Non-Significance - Mitigated for the above referenced project. A condition of the DNS-Mitigated was that a landscape plan. would be submitted for the project site. Before this project can receive its final administrative site plan approval the landscape plan will need to be submitted to this department for its review. The landscape plan will need to include the following items: 1. Additional landscaping within the northern portion of the existing parking lot which V is to be resurfaced. This landscaping would need to included protected planters In the areas of the parking lot that are presently marked as"no parking"areas. 2. An enhanced landscaping area between the parking lot (proposed and existing) and N.E. 4th Street. This area should include some low shrubs and evergreen ground cover to buffer the view of the parking lot and to prevent light from automobile headlights and glare from the vehicles from • reaching the public right-of-way. The plans should also indicate the required 24'aisles behind the compact parking stalls. As soon as the landscape plan is received, this Department will be able to conclude its review of the project, If you have any questions regarding this matter, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, Mark R. Pyw , ICP Project Manager • Yuhlltr 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton. Washington 98055 kr CITY OF RENTON Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Earl Clymer, Mayor Lynn 1Guttmann, Administrator August 30, 1990 .I fi Michael H.Yuhl, P.E. Yuhl &Associates 12828 Northup Way Bellevue,WA 98005 SUBJECT: RVTI Parking Lot Addition ECF;SA-069-90 Dear Mr.Yuhl: This letter is to Inform you that the comment period has ended for the Determination of Non-Significance- Mitigated for the above-referenced project. No significant comments were received. The Committee's determination is final and may be appealed to the City's Hearing Examiner no later than 5:00 p.m. on September 17, 1990. Any appeal must state clearly why the determination should be revised and must be accompanied by a non-refundable$75.00 filing fee. If you have questions or desire clarification of the above, please call Mark Pywell at 235-2550. For the Environmental R vie m ittee, )afj, Dona d"1Z.-Erickson,Al P Zoning Administrator cc: Renton School District#403 435 Main Avenue South Renton,WA 98055 strtapel/DKE/kae • )OO Mill Avenue Cnrith - Pentnn W!i0 , rrh,n ooncc _ tnnc\ ngc_nz--,i AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION 510 6 7 Kathleen Hoover ,being first duly sworn on oath states NOTICE OF that he/she is the Chief Clerk of the ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE VALLEY DAILY NEWS RENTON, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee • Kent Edition • Renton Edition • Auburn Edition (ERC) has issued a Determination of Non- Significance-Mitigated for the following pro- ject(s) under the authority of the Renton Daily newspapers published six (6) times a week. That said newspapers Municipal Code. The following Applicant(s) are legal newspapers and are now and have been for more than six have RVTmpleted a mitigation process: I months prior to the date of publication referred to, printed and published ECF;SA-069-90 in the English language continually as daily newspapers in Kent, King The applicant proposes to expand County, Washington. The ValleyDailyNews has been approved as a legal an adeditional parkingpc lot The include project an Y g PP g additional 24 spaces. project is newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for located at 3000 NE 4th Street. Further information regarding this action King County. is available in the Development Services Division, Third Floor, Municipal Building, The notice in the exact form attached, was published in the Kent Edition Renton, Washington, 235-2550. This Deter- mination Renton Edition x x Auburn Edition x x is FINAL. To appeal this Declara x (and not in supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers tion, you must file your appeal document during the below stated period. The annexed notice a P„t,-i r Nnt; cP with the hearing examiner within fourteen (14) days of the date the Declaration of Non-Significance is final or the Declaration (Environmental Determination) 4576 of Significance has been published in in the official city newspaper. See City Code Sec- tion 4-6-23, RCW 43.21C.075 and WAC was published on Sept. 3 , 1990 197-11-680 for further details. There shall be only one appeal of a Declaration of Non- Significance or Declaration of Significance, and if an appeal has already been filed, The full an�oltnt,• �pf the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the your appeal may be joined with the prior sum of$ appeal for hearing or may be dismissed if the other appeal has already been heard. This appeal period will end at 5:00 p.m. on September 17, 1990. Any appeal of this /1aelinj-e/1---"/ decision may be made to the City's Hearing Examiner, Municipal Building,200 Mill Ave- nue South, Renton, Washington 98055. An appeal must state clearly,in writing why the Determination should be revised and must Subscribed and sworn before me this 12th day of Sept . 19 90 be accompanied by a non-refundable $75.00 filing fee. Published in the Valley Daily News on September 3, 1990. Acct. No. 51067. 4576 e q --.1Ctel- Notar Public for the State of Washi Y g residing at At,Luz.1, /4;. King County, Washington VDN#87 Revised 4/89 NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated for the following project(s) under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code. The following Applicant(s) have completed a mitigation process: • RVTI ECF;SA-069-90 The applicant proposes to expand an existing parking lot to Include an additional 24 spaces. The project is located at 3000 NE 4th Street. Further information regarding this action is available in the Development Services Division, Third Floor, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington, 235-2550. This Determination is FINAL. To appeal this Declaration, you must file your appeal document with the hearing examiner within fourteen (14) days of the date the Declaration of Non-significance is final or the Declaration of Significance has been published in the official city newspaper. See City Code Section 4-6-23, RCW 43.21C.075 and WAC 197-11-680 for further details. There shall be only one appeal of a Declaration of Non-Significance pr Declaration of Significance, and if an appeal has already been filed, your appeal may be joined with the prior appeal for hearing or may be dismissed if the other appeal has already been heard. This appeal period will end at 5:00 p.m. on September 17, 1990. Any appeal of this decision may be made to the City's Hearing Examiner, Municipal Building, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, Washington 98055. An appeal must state clearly, in writing, why the Determination should be revised and must be accompanied by a non-refundable$75.00 filing fee. Publication Date: September 3, 1990 Account No. 51067 ' r41411' NOTICE OT ICE, ENVIRONMENTAL DECLARATIO APPLICATION NO. ECF;SA-069-90 PROPOSED ACTION RVTI RENTON SCHOOL DIST 03 THE APPLICANT PROPOSES TO EXPAND AN EXISTING PARK NG LOT TO INCLUDE AN ADDITIONAL 24 SPACES. GENERAL LOCATION AND OR ADDRESS 3000 NE 4TH STREET POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE CE.R.C.] HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION ❑DOES XDOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT DWILL $.WILL NOT BE REQUIRED. THE CITY OF RENTON WILL NOT ACT ON THIS PROPOSAL FOR 15 DAYS FROM THE DATE BELOW. COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY AN APPEAL OF THE ABOVE DETERMINATION MAY BE FILED WITH THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER BY 5:00 P.M., SEPTEMBER 17, 1990 • FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON PLANNING DIVISION AT 235-2550. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION CERTIFICATION , ' HEREBY CERTIFY THAT 3 COPIES OF • THE ABOVE DOCUMENT WERE POSTED BY ME IN • CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON OR NEARBY THE DESCRIBED PROPERTY ON y- - gd • 0000�p,�ET`. ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before roe, a,,o0�Q ..\ss�pflf°4°(/� ®®© Notary Public in and for the State of Washi kt • '0 oO e .. QQ residing n • Z on the —�v ►vOrA�yI , ED� ` p :D� day of 40 a .�; PUBLICTo o � -9j.*; gp,o �c©® N OT E ENVIRONMENTAL DECLARATION APPLICATION NO. ECF;SA-069-90 PROPOSED ACTION RVTI RENTON SCHOOL DIST 403 THE APPLICANT PROPOSES TO EXPAND AN EXISTING PARKING LOT TO INCLUDE AN ADDITIONAL 24 SPACES. GENERAL LOCATION AND OR ADDRESS 3000 NE 4TH STREET POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE C E.R.C. ) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION PDOES XDOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT ❑WILL SWILL NOT BE REQUIRED. THE CITY OF RENTON WILL NOT ACT ON THIS PROPOSAL FOR 15 DAYS FROM THE DATE BELOW. COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY AN APPEAL OF THE ABOVE DETERMINATION MAY BE FILED WITH THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER BY 5:00 P.M., SEPTEMBER 17, 1990 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON PLANNING DIVISION AT 2 3 5-2 5 5 0. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION `$ CITY-40F RENTON Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Earl Clymer, Mayor Lynn Guttmann, Administrator August 28, 1990 - Michael H.Yuhl, P.E. Yuhl &Associates 12828 Northup Way Bellevue,WA 98005 Subject: RVTI Parking Lot Addition ECF; SA-069-90 We have reviewed your letter, dated August 20, 1990, requesting the City to reconsider the conditions attached to this project. It Is our position that the conditions are based upon Code requirements and the previous EIS and can not be waived at this time. It is your option to appeal the conditions imposed by the • Environmental Review Committee (ERC)to the Hearing Examiner. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact me at 235-2550. Sincerely, a • WozisW/e,"77 Mark R. Pywell,AICP Project Manager 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2631 CITY of RENroN E G E I v E YUHL & (206) 641-2886 - AUG 2 1 1990 ;12828 NORTHUP WAY ASSOCIATES 3ELLEVUE, WA 98005 BUILDING DIVISION, August 20, 1990 City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 Attn: Mr. Donald K. Erickson, Zoning Administrator Re: RVTI ECF:SA 069-90 Dear Mr. Erickson: We wish to ask that the City reconsider the following conditions contained in your August 3rd letter. 1. The condition states "Provide a Landscape Plan...indicating the type,, size and location of plant materials to be located within the existing parking area... We ask your reconsideration of this requirement for the following reasons. a. This requirement is a mitigation of an existing use that is in a different area. We believe that mitigation of the visual impacts under SEPA for this proposal is appropriate only at the location of the new parking places, as this proposal does not add to the parking, but rather places additional parking closer to the building for staff and maintenance convenience. (The plan shows seal coating and striping of the existing lot which is not indicated in the application as no permit is needed for maintenance work.) I understand in talking with Mark that these planter islands were offered as a mitigation when the school was expanded. I would hope that if this is a requirement, it should be more properly addressed as uncompleted work of the building phase which presumably related to the permitted occupancy of the buildings rather than made a requirement of a much smaller project for which the scale of the mitigation seems inappropriate. b. The present lot is also striped and used for motorcycle driver's license training. Adding planting islands to this area would disrupt the use of the area for such instructional purposes. c. The landscaping required for the interior parking lot would presumably be the 5% required of new lots under Chapter 22 of the Renton building regulations. This 5% requirement would result in the loss of 31 parking places. It would be difficult to show the School Board the benefits to the taxpayer of spending $14,000 to add 24 parking places in one area while spending additional money to add planters and suitable soils and irrigation which take away 31 parking places in another area for this project. 2. Lighting - The proposed condition mentions glare from security lights. We would request clarification as the amount budgeted for this work does not include making any additional lighting improvements for these parking areas as they are adjacent to existing driveways which receive light. 3. We believe that mitigation of the visual impacts and conformance with 4-2204 6 B (2) (a) of the Renton Code would be met by an additional landscaping buffer consisting:of a row of cedars to match the plantings along Monroe would be provided along the fire lane opposite the proposed parking areas to meet the, requirements. Sincerely yours, Michael H. YuhI, P.E. cc: Renton School District MHY:c ::mETRo Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle Exchange Building • 821 Second Ave. • Seattle,WA 98104-1598 August 15, 1990 PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF RENTON AUG 1 7 1990 Environmental Review Committee '* CEIVE c/o Don Erickson, Chief Current Planning Division 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 Determination of Nonsignificance File No. : ECF-069-90 RVTI Dear Environmental Review Committee: Metro staff has reviewed this proposal and anticipates no significant impacts to water quality or to Metro's wastewater facilities or public transportation services. Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment. Sincerely, Gregory M. Bush, Manager Environmental Planning Division GMB:p1g5547 _ . CITY OF RENTON ,.. , ,-.., -• ij>s I .- \:- C • Jepartroent of Planning/Building/Public Works , ik, -• P M _ „... co*(A(11 , 172,44 u 6 --- 200 Mill Avenue South-Renton, Washington 98055 it,,,,,:zzi., ii?,.• --------,,,...J9-36,0--e—,..-7,-,,.._, -.- 4 # Pft) 44 o * ik.,'s -\ \ AUG - 6 1990`vez?,,'4, ., - - .. 4"3,‘,. ''‘i ) • c"".. Ktng County. ' 1'4\ • ED p iE E1V -9 12015 S.E. 128th St. 0 Renton, WA 98055 - . . • ___ ______ _ --------- --- - -- --} • -1 - - . Ifitnilatilsailikhluitill • NOTICE OF PENDING SITE PLAN APPROVAL RENTON,WASHINGTON A Site Plan Application has been filed and accepted with the Development Services Division of the City of Renton. The following briefly describes the application and the necessary Public Approvals. DESCRIPTION: RVTI ECF;SA-069-90 The applicant proposes to expand an existing parking lot to include an additional 24 spaces. r GENERAL LOCATION: 3000 NE 4TH STREET PUBLIC APPROVALS: Environmental Review Site Plan Approval The application can be reviewed in the Development Services Division located on the third floor of Renton City Hall. Comments will be accepted anytime prior to Public Hearings, during P_Iblic Hearings, or prior to an administrative site plan approval. For further information on the application Qr dates of final action by the City, please contact the Planning Division, at 235-2550. ui GRAPHIC SCALE I N.E. 6th PL =y 1' = 200' - < Itnrs c r I i I Q 100' 200' 300' I - N.E. 6th ST. r� 4,.<, W i 'N- '1 Z al, SINGLE FAMILYIl kHOUSES .C.sil j..4.: i I I I I 1 I 11� f :DpaZZ Wcc o APARTMENTS . H 4 RENTON VOCATIONAL x 0.) NO• § r TECHNICAL INSTITUTE W o SERVICE�� a /i STATION 'S F i LOCATION z = OF WORK - H- 66 sn X _ W _ P I BASE BID ;‘"ACCESS ) 1 , i EX. PARKING r-APARTMENTS s 5,i ALT. BID # 1 0 FIRE ACCESS ONLY I.E 4th ST. D . sh CGREENWOOD 1 f CEMETERY CITY OF RENTON '4,cc)- PM `�� v '�)epartment of Planning/Building/Public Works 3 AUG �3 200 Mill Avenue South -Renton, Washington 98055 90 '25 Yosemite �SO v�w N P\G��\oF?k Q P v�reato. Oscar scar & Darlene Orestad 523 Kirkland Ave. N.E. Renton, tI" £: S23 4805 302 . .'a9 08/011/90 O c AR /NG TINE EXPIRED UREST€O PC3 BOX BBB RENTON OS& RETURN TO SENDER NOTICE OF PENDING SITE PLAN APPROV L RENTON, WASHINGTON A Site Plan Application has been filed and accepted with the Development Services Division of the City of Renton. The following briefly describes the application and the necessary Public Approvals. DESCRIPTION: RVTI ECF;SA-069-90 The applicant proposes to expand an existing parking lot to include an additional 24 spaces. GENERAL LOCATION: 3000 NE 4TH STREET PUBLIC APPROVALS: Environmental Review Site Plan Approval The application can be reviewed in the Development Services Division located o the third floor of Renton City Hall. Comments will be accepted anytime prior to Public Hearings, during Public Hearings, or prior to an administrative site plan approval. For further information on the application or dates of final action by the City, please contact the Planning Division, at 235-2550. _ _ _ [______ GRAPHIC SCALE N.E. 6th Pi.. = 1' 200' i 111111 I I I I 1 Cr 100' 200' 300' — N.E. 6th ST. r 1 z r - NI 0 I ,_., - , 0 . -7-, — z yF i^ Sall 1] ui _ xi 44 ' z SINGLE MI < FAMILY o ' HOUSES rc X 3 4 z c Q co z w!Y !.44 CAPARTMENTS RENTON VOCATIONALX W 4OF}'/1 TECHNICAL INSTITUTE • c a SERVICE § r (STATION '�F LOCATION z `OF WORK F In ir w - P-I l BASE BID —' -ACCESS ,�J NI I APARTMENTS EX. PARKING 1 a I � I ALT. BID # 1 FIRE ACCESS ONLY- N.E. 4th ST. My / 14 ul (GREENWOOD 1 / a4. uI CEMETERY 4' $ CITY OF RENTON P `i\ " ` � ` P M `� -- I ',)epartment of Planning/Building/Public Works N 3 AUG „ -.-� 200 Mill Avenue South -Renton, Washington 98055 /990"7 - ���-a lte jV x ' PLANNING DIVISION ,,Q\5,4e CITY OF RENTON AUG ® 9 1990 Dennis Obermeier RECEIVER 14403 S.E. May Valley Rd. Renton, WA 98055 NOT DEL!VERAELE� �, AS ADDI;ESSEO `�. .� u' Cr'FI � I g 9tiq ,'�a ,- - tiNASLE TO FOR' AP,D fri VI •-` 'RETURN TO WRITER .1 19 •3-1 frari[EalrrtilrUrWIt srr ire Iltirrl;ri AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION 51 0 i 7 Itatiti d.. aouv.2.1 ,being first duly sworn on oath states that he/she is the Chief Clerk of the VALLEY DAILY NEWS NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION • Kent Edition • Renton Edition • Auburn Edition ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee Daily newspapers published six (6) times a week. That said newspapers (ERC) has issued a Determination of Non- Significance-Mitigatedare legal newspapers and are now and have been for more than six drh for the following Re pro- ton ject(s) under the authority of the Renton months prior to the date of publication referred to, printed and published Municipal Code. in the English language continually as daily newspapers in Kent, King RVTI County, Washington. The ValleyDailyNews has been approved as a legal The appOs9 so Y g PP g The applicant proposes to expand newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for an existing parking lot to include an King County. additional 24 spaces.The property is located at 3000 NE 4th Street. SARTORI - NEW PARKING The notice in the exact form attached, was published in the Kent Edition ECF;SA-070-90 XX , Renton Edition X x , Auburn Edition , (and not in The applicant proposes to convert a su lement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers grassed playh field into the formerave el d PP g Y mentary school a paved and during the below stated period. The annexed notice a n U h i; ,• .1 t i^ landscaped 76 car parking lot. The property is located at 315 Garden (Enyirnnaa.an rcaiaaci(an) -112j Avenue North. August 6 , 1999 This decision will be finalized in fifteen was published on (15) days. Written comments received after 5:00 p.m., August 21, 1990 will not be con- sidered. A fourteen (14) day appeal period f The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the will DNS-M. Thecommhece followingigati the f es union d g g g mitigation measures imposed sum of$ 2 v _ by the City of Renton's Environmental Review Committee are available at the Development Services, Division, Municipal XattlifAi) c����X�/ Building, Renton, Washington 98055. Phone: 235-2550. Published in the Valley Daily News on August 6, 1990. Acct. No. 51067. 4420 Subscribed and sworn before me this 16 t Xi day of Au n u s t 19 90 N Public for the State of Washington residing at Auburn, King County, Washington PLANNING DIVISION VDN#87 Revised 4/89 CITY OF RENTON SEP 1 3 1990 RECEIVED NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a Determination of Non-Significance- Mitigated for the following project(s) under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code. RVTI ECF;SA-069-90 The applicant proposes to expand an existing parking lot to include an additional 24 spaces. The property is located at 3000 NE 4th Street. SARTORI - NEW PARKING ECF;SA-070-90 The applicant proposes to convert a grassed play field of the former elementary school into a paved and landscaped 76 car parking lot. The property is located at 315 Garden Avenue North. This decision will be finalized in fifteen (15) days. Written comments received after 5:00 p.m., August 21, 1990 will not be considered. A fourteen (14) day appeal period will commence following the finalization of DNS-M. The mitigation measures imposed by the City of Renton's Environmental Review Committee are available at the Development Services Division, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington 98055. Phone: 235-2550. Publication Date: August 6, 1990 Account No. 51067 • °TICE ENVIRONMENTAL DECLARATION APPLICATION NO. ECF;SA-069-90 PROPOSED ACTION RVTI RENTON SCHOOL DI 403 THE APPLICANT PROPOSES TO EXPAND AN EXISTING P A RKING LOT TO INCLUDE AN ADDITIONAL 24 SPACES. GENERAL LOCATION AND OR ADDRESS 3000 NE 4TH STREET ,c'1Z- POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE [E.R.C.] HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION ❑DOES IXDOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT DWILL WILL NOT BE REQUIRED. THE CITY OF RENTON WILL NOT ACT ON THIS PROPOSAL FOR 15 DAYS FROM THE DATE BELOW. COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY AUGUST 21, 1990 AN APPEAL OF THE ABOVE DETERMINATION MAY BE FILED WITH THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER BY 5:00 P.M., • FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON PLANNING DIVISION AT 235-2550. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION CERTIFICATION I , • ' HEREBY CERTIFY THAT 3 COPIES OF • • THE ABOVE DOCUMENT 'JERE POSTED BY ME IN c. CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON OR NEARBY THE DESCRIBED PROPERTY ON _ • • ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn •to before me, a GRET•J A ��, • Notary Public, in and for the State of cashing ���P Q�; •••••• •'SICAI •G , • residi in C.) on-the' 'pgg�g Dfq. day o (> : •Zs V NOTARY S ag • PVBUC c..rpr\/ imnns • :1::: es.ry : 4T>ON::::: .CURRENT- ..;.;::::..,.::: P LANN: �G:: .:... A . FIDAV: o�.. �' s <`.v :::::::::::>:>::;: ... . EI2. . .C` ..:.g :.: MAx:Z;1NG . :;:::::: K:: ::;.< On the 3la day of a u;t:' 199b , I deposited in the mails of the United States a sealed envelope containing c:i e.lerYm p-hS•4- CAncs-aC.k-Ts documents . This information was .sent to: Name Representing p.o. e Car (lo -v, C,.` av� doh It\-� 'P-fi. 4 W,1ckI; . . ot. �o�.�, s - i)-1 -RSV CUAACA. UAL- r-Lt it 4' ----r-vi...e. ,,,e.. (.14(..c_r___ tSvItlIAAA-e_ Lk1-4,4,-rtL4:4- (Signature of Sender) S-4v-N,..Apet___ C.t. r .C....ebr Sub cribed aiipburnn to me this day of 19 a/ ♦♦♦ a ARE Ta ��i� ' es •••V • '`o•: i a. � i i C • �,� lYPub 'in and for the . -A t Pile� St of W hington residing 'yj� ir at •o Ofr �O♦•` therein. *'**ie WASHIN�0 P•r•o•jec•t• •Name Project> Number .. 0 r' 1 CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST NO.: ECF-069-90 APPLICATION NO(S): SA-069-90 PROPONENT: Renton School District • PROJECT NAME: RVTI DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant proposes to expand ,an existing parking lot to include an additional 24 spaces. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 3000 NE 4th Street LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Development Planning Section The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). Conditions were imposed as mitigation measures by the Environmental Review Committee under their authority of Section 4-2822(D) Renton Municipal)Code (see attached sheet). These conditions are necessary to mitigate environmental impacts identified during the environmental review process. This Determination of Non-Significance -Mitigated (DNS-M)is issued under WAC 197-11-340(2). Because mitigation measures have been imposed,the lead agency will not act on this proposal for fifteen (15) days from August 6, 1990. Any interested party may submit written comments which must be submitted by 5:00 p.m., August 21, 1990, in order to be considered. A fourteen (14) day appeal period will commence following the finalization of the DNS-M. Responsible Official: Environmental Review Committee c/o Don Erickson,Zoning Administrator Development Services Division Department of Planning/Building/Public Works 200 Mill Avenue South Renton,WA 98055 PUBLICATION DATE: August 6, 1990 DATE OF DECISION: August 1, 1990 SIGNATURES: Lynn A. utt n,Administrator Depart ent anning/Building/Public Works 41' Jay Co ngt o n, Exe,t a Assistant to the . or w, - DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED MITIGATION MEASURES PROJECT: RVTI PROPONENT: Renton School Dist 403 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST: ECF-069-90 APPLICATION NUMBER: SA-069-90 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant proposes to expand an existing parking lot to include an additional 24 spaces. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 3000 NE 4th Street RECOMMENDATIONS: The Environmental Review Committee issued a Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated with the following conditions: Aesthetics 1. The applicant shall provide a landscaping plan indicating the type, size and location of plant materials to be located within the existing parking area and for the additional landscape buffer along NE 4th Street. The additional landscaping will buffer the visual impacts of the parking lot and prevent glare from security light from reaching adjacent roadways. i mmdoc- 1 c�' > y CIT1 OF RENTON "LL Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Earl Clymer, Mayor Lynn Guttmann, Administrator August 3, 1990 Washington State Department of Ecology Environmental Review Section Mail Stop PV-11 Olympia, WA 98504 SUBJECT: Environmental Determinations Transmitted herewith are copies of Environmental Determinations and Environmental Checklists for those projects reviewed by the Environmental Review Committee on August 1, 1990: DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED RVTI E CF;SA-069-90 The applicant proposes to expand an existing parking lot to include an additional 24 spaces. The project is located at 3000 NE 4th Street. SARTORI - NEW PARKING ECF;SA-070-90 The applicant proposes to convert a grassed play field of the former elementary school into a paved and landscaped 76 car parking lot. The property is at 315 Garden Avenue North. The 15 day comment period for these projects will end on August 21, 1990. Following the end of the comment period, the City will finalize its Determination unless comments received require a reevaluation. Following the finalization of the Determination, there is a required 14 day appeal period. If you have questions, please call Mark Pywell or me at 235-2550. For the Environmental Review Committee, Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator cc: Mr. Craig Larson, King County Planning Division Mr. Gregory M. Bush, Metro Department of Wildlife Mr. Joe Robels, Department of Fisheries Mr. James Lutz, Department of Transportation Ms. Connie Corpuz, City of Seattle Duwamish Tribal Office Muckleshoot Tribal Office agncyltr/DKE/kac 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2631 440, CITA. DF RENTON Ira `N._ ;. Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Earl Clymer, Mayor Lynn Guttmann, Administrator August 3, 1990 Mike Yuhl 12828 Northup Way, #300 Bellevue, WA 98005 SUBJECT: RVTI ECF;SA-069-90 Dear Mr. Yuhl: This letter is written on behalf of the Environmental Review Committee and is to inform you that they have completed their review of the environmental impacts of the above-referenced project. The Committee, on August 1, 1990, decided that your project may be issued a Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated with the following conditions: 1. The applicant shall provide a landscaping plan indicating the type, size and location of plant materials to be located within the existing parking area and for the additional landscape buffer along NE 4th Street. The additional landscaping will buffer the visual impacts of the parking lot and prevent glare from security light from reaching adjacent roadways. Because the Environmental Review Committee imposed specific mitigation measures rather than issue a Determination of Significance, there is a required 15 day comment period during which comments are solicited from various agencies, jurisdictions or individuals (including the applicant) who may have an interest in the Committee's decision. The comment period will end August 21, 1990. Following the end of the comment period, the City will finalize its Determination unless comments received require a reevaluation. Following the finalization of the Determination, there is a required 14 day appeal period. Staff urges you to contact the various City representatives, as appropriate, (e.g., the Department of Planning/Building/Public Works) as soon as possible, to obtain more information concerning specific mitigation elements recommended for this project, if you have specific questions. This information will assist you in planning for implementation of your project and will enable you to exercise your appeal rights more fully, if you choose to do so. In addition, by the end of the comment period, we should be able to establish a tentative public hearing date before the Hearing Examiner, should a public hearing be necessary. If you have any questions or desire clarification of the above, please call Mark Pywell or me at 235-2550. F e Environmental Revie ommittee, • Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator cc: Renton School District#403 435 Main Ave S Renton, WA 98055 ercdecsn/DKE/kac 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2631 tVI ,..:..NlT Y < :>:<:: > <: :::::;;::;E:;;: , D E PAID. .M> :>'CO MU D>E�/ELOP.M NT • < : ENVYR <':1VMENTAL.FtE W.0 E'E <«< > < < <• • .:::...:...::.:.. ...:..:...:..:. ..:... .:.,. :.:TA1FF:>RE:P:tni• :: : <:::::<:: ::::>:::: <:: :::::: ::: ::: ::: :: .:::...:: .... ....:::...:. :.:.:.::::...:.:.:...:.::. :.:... ..... :::::... :A' u 1 .1990 :R D, r S,h�.01 s c:::»::: ::»AP.f?L•ICAN7<: :::::::::::::>::::::::::::::::::::::::::::. >:::::.:: e o c a .................................... .... ...... .... :ENV:I Q:NM:.:NTA.. G . C.:::.:81, :..*:::?.C::�5 ::. .9 .::: ..::.......ot.:. ..........::.... •8, ::::.::.;.if::: :..:.. ....::.: :akin:::'i..tir :::. a :::: : :::>DESCRY?TION:OF::P]�OPDSAL : :::: :: .........e.a ...ca..... .,. . ...... :::>::n : ex s >.0 N : ih. r e>:::::>:»>LO.CATION::QE::PRO.PO.SAL : : >: : :'>: ::::::�000 E S e. .................................................................... �`�:���nm n a c����>:N t a o Gar::::::::::: >::<:::::::::•:::::>::::::::::::::<:: ::::::::::�::::::::': : ::::::::::.:.::::::: ::.:::::::: : : ;>::>:»::>>:::::>:::<::::::::::>:::«:::::::::::>::>::>:::: >: :::: ::>Noise:::L: ht::arid G a e ..:..,:....... ..::::: .:...:. :.. ..:.. .......... ..................... . ................... .. ... nati`;n 0 : .7t:: i .-::SRC ss e:.a D t rm►na o ::::::•::::>> : :RECOMMENDATI:ONSt:::>::::::::::<::•: ::::::>: :::::::'; to eco. ... e........... .... ... .. .......... .u .. . ....... .................. :,.Ilwinl <: �:<f: :N� ri'� i��riflca ce. :t: < 4h f o JH� 6t ST. ti ill- P-I (zq� olp! aimi ...,- .. u_i r` • ------ Jill FAMILY tc ' HOUSESSINGLE .(. Y X i .. . illf\ ---t-_______4.i . ll o 7)''' " Z f1 Illt IC.(t0," t-c, .. . Z .44. L(t.e.. 4.-. 4 : r'0 41 /o APARTMENTS 11 oc 2 Q F ' i O N RENTON VOCATIONAL) X u) 0c: 1 TECHNICAL INSTITU IL SERVIICE a tie ' LOCf 110N z =OF WORK I— P-I r ; w BASE BID : - -ACCESS '. . T APARTMENTS EX. PARKING /_ V s .ELT. Bt D # 1 �' - —_) - FIRE ACCESS ONLY N_ . 4th ST. DWG- ' 1 GREENWOOD 1 /G- .r.r.',rrrrnv • Environmental Review Staff Report - i Renton Vocational Technical School August 1, 1990 Page 2 • Aesthetics 1. The applicant shall provide a landscaping plan indicating the type, size and location of plant materials to be located within the existing parking area and for the additional landscape buffer along NE 4th Street. The additional landscaping will buffer the visual impacts of the parking lot and prevent glare from security light from reaching adjacent roadways. The applicant proposes'to add 20 compact parking spaces and four standard parking spaces to an existing parking area. This addition would provide a total of 905 parking spaces:on the school campus. The Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) that was prepared in 1985 indicated that a total of 880 parking spaces would be provided on the campus. The EIS also indicated the need for landscaping around the perimeter of the parking areas and in islands within the parking area to mitigate the visual impacts of the parking'areas on adjacent streets and to prevent glare from the security lighting: The twenty compact parking spaces are being proposed for an area along an existing fire lane. In order to provide the 24 foot aisle required by Ordinance the applicant will have to either.widen the existing fire lane or, if space allows, move the head of the parking stall closer to the building in order to provide the required aisle for backing out of the parking stalls. • 1. Aesthetics/Land Use Impacts: The proposed development consists of adding twenty (20) compact parking stalls and four (4) standard parking stalls to an existing parking lot at the Renton Vocational Technical Institute (RVTI). The parking area currently includes 113 compact parking stalls and 271 standard parking stalls. After the completion of this project, there would be a total of 905 parking stalls for the RVTI campus. The plans, as submitted, indicate a twenty-three (23) foot wide aisle behind the proposed compact parking stalls. The Renton Code requires a twenty-four (24)foot aisle behind parking stalls in order ensure there is enough room for cars to easily back out of the parking stall. The applicant will be required to modify the plans in order to provide a twenty-four foot wide aisle. As this project site has been developed in the past, landscape strips of adequate width were provided between the parking area and both Monroe Ave. NE and NE 4th Street. The landscaping in these strips consists of trees and turf. Staff recommends that 'additional landscaping be provided to further buffer the visual impacts of the parking area on the adjacent roadways. Within the existing parking lot, the paved areas that are not used for parking should have the paving removed and landscaping, trees and ground cover installed. Additional landscaping, including shrubs and ground cover, should also be installed in the landscaping strip along NE 4th Street. 'An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) was prepared for the RVTI Campus development in 1985. The EIS indicated that 880 parking spaces would be provided on the campus. It also indicated the need for a landscape buffer around the perimeter of the campus and for landscaping within the parking areas. The landscaping would prevent glare from reaching the adjacent streets and mitigate the visual impacts of the parking areas. Mitigation Measures: The applicant shall provide the following: a) Landscape plans indicating the improved landscape areas within the existing parking area and along NE 4th Street; and b) a modified site plan indicating a 24-foot wide aisle behind the compact parking stalls. - Policy Nexus: Parking and Loading Ordinance 4-14, Landscaping Requirements 4-31-34, and Comprehensive Plan Section III.C. I • Environmental Review Staff Report Renton Vocational Technical School August 1, 1990 Page 3 2. Natural Environment Impacts: The portion of the project site that is now proposed for development was leveled and landscaped during the past development of the school. Only a minor amount of grading will be required to prepare the base for the proposed parking area. Mitigation Measures: None required. Policy Nexus: Environmental Review Ordinance 4-6 3. Traffic Impacts: Construction activities, including grading and paving of the proposed parking area, could generate traffic which would impact area roadways. Based upon the fact that NE 4th Street is designated as a Major Arterial and Monroe Avenue NE is designated as a Secondary Arterial, measures will be required (e.g., limited hauling hours) to mitigate traffic impacts from hauling activities on these roadways. Once the construction is completed, the use of the new parking stalls is not expected to generate additional traffic on these roadways. Mitigation Measures: Construction traffic to and from the site shall be limited to the hours between 8 A.M. and 3:30 P.M. i Policy Nexus: Environmental Review Ordinance 4-6 4. Noise, Light and Glare Impacts: Noise, light and glare are anticipated in conjunction with the grading and paving of.the parking area. • Some mitigation of these impacts will be achieved through the recommended limitation on hauling hours and construction activities. During the operation of parking area, glare could be produced from the required safety lighting. This impact would be mitigated to the extent possible by the additional landscaping recommended by staff. Mitigation Measures: 1) See Traffic Mitigation. 2) Provide additional;landscaping along.NE 4th Street. Policy Nexus: Landscaping Requirements 4-31-34 a ous C de artment h y p s ave reviewe....�n�l gvmmented upgn the:;pro�eot.„Thesecornments • • • • • r 1 •. :... ................................:.........:..........:.. N:` >:': `:`:'::<> > ; ' :mryEPARTMEN.'1': :O:F:�CO: ,:<:..I ,,.. M > C�ERTIFI� A:w IONS: >: >:::�::: > : > > >> > » ' C C T . W.NERS ii.:] ; ::<::::... : ::::.::0 F.NOTI:F:ICAT:IQ:N....;OF.:P;RQP:E:RTY.Q........... . ..... ......,:..:... .:...:::::: :: »::<::::::>::<:::»>::>::>:: ::<:»>:::>within:;::3:0;0:::::;�.eea<:>of::;the;;:sub ect: s::it.e,>;: :;.;�.; >:.;>;:::;;;;;:.;:::<.;:.;: 0 CITY of REwa% . ***FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY*** ! Z 6 �990 • JUN _ PROJECT TITLE: R�k 9 kir+qWit. �v APPLICANT: vi m Schoo\ S1S4vICI ' ` o3., APPLICATION NUMBER: 2- 0(o 9 -10 1 Th ' fo,llowing is a list of property owners within 300 feet of the sub'j'ect ite. The Community Development Department will notify thes*i_ihdividuals of the proposed development. NAME)",,. ;:s„" , ADDRESS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL t NUMBER ✓Johnston, Edgar`. 465 Jefferson Ave. 'N.E. Renton 98055 1. 723610-0005-0 , Clapp, Donal'd. E. 2935 N.E. 5th P1 . Renton 98055 ' 723610-0010-0 'Wallace, Louise 458 Index.Ave. N.E. Renton 98055 ; 723610-0070-0 Zigweid, David M & Josi 454 Index Ave. N.E. Renton 98055 1 723610-0075-0 Thompson, Verda M. 455 Jefferson Ave. N.E. Renton 98055 ' 723610-0080-0 Pillon, Charle-s W. • 414 Index P1 . N.E. Renton 98055 , 723650-0020-0 Graham, Mary E. 408 Index P1 . N.E. Renton 98055 ! 723650-0025-0 ' Longwell , W.K. 402 Index P1 . N.E. Renton 98055 723650-0030-0 ' Emmons, D..C'. 2908 N.E. 4th St. Renton 98055 ; 723650-0035-0 Phillips, B. 2914 N.E. 4th St. Renton 98055 ; 723650-0040-0 Ferrer, Tommy N. & Lydia 2920 N.E. 4th St. Renton 98055 I 723650-0045-0 2 McPeak, Russell L. & Marie 1 409 Jefferson Ave. N.E. .Renton 98055 723650-0050-0 - Eixenberger, M.D. . 443 Index Ave. 'N.E.' Renton 98055 . ' 723650-0055-0 ' Madison, -Thomas 3. . 447 Index Ave. N.E. Renton 98055 ' 723650-0060-0 Claybo, Walter -L. 451 Index Ave. N.E. . Renton 98055 ' 723650-0065-0 Martin, Herbert H'. 455 Index Ave. N.E. Renton 98055 723650-0070-0 .. Goodwin, A. 551 Jefferson' Ave. 'N.E. ,,Renton' 98055 807420-0055-0 Orestad, Oscar T. & Darlene ,R. ; 523 Kirkland Ave. N.E. Renton '98055 807420-0060-0 ' McGinnis, Henna M. 517 Kirkland Ave. N.E. Renton 98055 ! 807420-0065-0 Danielson,' Darrell A. 511 Kirkland Ave. N. Renton 98055 ' 807420-0070-0 Howe, Evelyn J. , 505 Kirkland Ave. .N.E. Renton 98055 i 807420-0075-0 Scott, Elaine'J. 483 Kirkland 'Ave. N.E. Renton 98055 807420-0080-0 Jodoin, Reine J. . 479 Kirkland- Ave. 'N.E. Renton 98055 • 807420-0085-0 Frank, ,D.R. ' 475 Kirkland Ave. N.E. Renton 98055 807420-0090-0 Gates, Joseph B. • 662 Jefferson Ave. N.E." Renton' 98055 807420-0125-0 ' Randa, Anton S. • �689 Kirkland Ave. N.E. . Renton 98055 807420-0130-0 ' Ecalbarger, Richard W. 683 Kirkland Ave. N.E. . Renton 98055 807420-0135-0 Kalasountos, Theo 633 Kirkland Ave, N.E. Renton 98055 807420-0140-0 Miller., Rose-Marie H. 629 Kirkland Ave. N.E. Renton 98055 807420-0145-0 Ketterling, L.K. 625 Kirkland Ave. N.E. Renton 98055 807420-0150-0 • NAME • ADDRESS ° ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER Christensen,. Louise L. 621 Kirkland AveN.E. Renton 98055 807420-0155-0 Carew, Garry B. & Terry K. 617 Kirkland Ave N.E. Renton 98055 807420-0160-0 , Jett, Alan M. 0 583 Kirkland Aye, N.E. Renton. 98055- 807420-0165-0 ' Knedler, W.R. 579 Kirkland Aye, N.E. Renton 98055 807420-0170-0 Medley, Kenneth W. & Ellen 756 Kirkland Ave N.E. Renton 98055 780900-0090-0 • Dehart, 'Robert° D. & Joanne 3110 N.E. 7th°St. Renton 98055 780900-0095-0 Tuffs, Terry L. &°Soderland, S. 3116 N.E. 7th St. Renton 98055 780900-0100-0 Seltveit, Rodney° D. & Joyce 3120 N.E. 7th Si. Renton 98055 780900-0105-0 Church of Latter' Day Saints 705 Monroe°Ave.,N.E. Renton 98055 780920-0020-0 • II 722780-0426-0 Price, Brian R. 755 Kirk)and Ave. N.E. Renton 98055 . 894850-0030-0 ' Clark, Wendell' G. & Claudia 3033 N.E..7th St. Renton 98055_ 894850-0070-0 Turner, Gary R, Y�•Shirley M. 693 Kirkland Ave •N.E. Renton 98055 894850-0075-0 Somers,• Phillip E. 697 Kirkland Ave.,N.E. Renton 98055 894850-0080-0 Renton School Dist. 3000:.N.E. 4th St. Renton 98055 722780-0425-0 722780-0450-0 722780-0475-0 (CohTinutoo ° e 722780-0500-0 • CERTIFICATION • . • I, MIGHAmL" H 1L ,° hereby certify that the above list(s) "of adjacent property owners and their addresses were taken from the records of the King County Assessor as prescribed by law. ATTEST Subscribed and sworn to before ,me, a Notary Public, in and for the State of .• -I ashingt616],residing at �,,f „ G(�a a.n the 3Q day of �d7-,cu� /9 90 . O Signed: 1 11,,W4 14)11- ' CERTIFICATION FOR MAILING I, , hereby certify that notices of the public meeting on the subject site plan approval were' mailed on , to each listed adjacent property owner as prescribed by law. ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before • me, a Notary Public, in-and for the State of ' Washington residing at on the day of . Signed: • • Rev10/89 CERTNOT2.doc • ' n • • • ::�i:v:is�:{4:�'i�!�17i:? iiii:4i::}i:i::!:iiii;:;:;i:':ii;:i:+:'}:�}i:<�:�i:{C:i;:;:!;:�.:�i::•:�iis�:�!:i}::}}::ii:'}iji::ii:<::Ci�:?�:�i:i:y�(:?:vl}:�: :�:::�::::�:'::�::::•::�::':::•::•:::�: :::•:::�:::•:::�:::•i:[°!L:::�:`i::$L;:;:!j::.�:;�:}:•};�{{:...............: ..•,:.{....:....,:":'�:�i:�:G:�:U.i•ii:?<??iii::}$$ji$iii'r? .vr.:•'si::•f�:}i:•is•:•i:•:•is^'•i:e::•is ... 5 > �> � O.F:•;N:�TIFI CAT:I.O.N>::O.F>:P:ROP:ERTI(. 0................... .................................... ***FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY*** PROJECT TITLE: APPLICANT: APPLICATION NUMBER: • • Th ' :€ollowing is a list of property owners within 300 feet of the s�.;bject,site,• ,The . Community Development Department will notify these'qnci.ivictuals of the proposed development,. _ • ADDRESS • ASSESSOR'S PARCEL • NUMBER RVTT' (cont }hued) Cedar Park Partners, Lts. 450 Monroe Ave. N:E. Renton 98055 092305-9051-0 c/o Michael Mastro 510 Rainier Ave. .S. Seattle 98144 Muchli.nski; Margaret 522 Monroe. Ave. •N;.E. Renton 98055 092305-9121-0 Roy Brown Auto Service 414 Monroe Ave. N.E, Renton .98055 , 092305-9171-0 Jacobs, Norman'& Flora-C. 530 Monroe Ave. N.E. Renton 98055 092305-9230-0 Tietbohl , Patricia 500 Monroe Ave. N.E. Renton 98055 337770.0210-0 c/o Liberty Real Estate, Federal Reserve Plaza 23rd •F1r. Boston, MA 02210 _Von Vougtlande.r, Halle 3123 N.E. 4th St. Renton 98055 162305-9052-0. " 162305-9128-0 U-Haul Real Estate Co. 3131N.E. 4th St. Renton 98055 162305-9058-0 c/o P.O. Box 29046, PhoenfK, 'AZ 85038 King County 12015 S.E. 128th St. Renton 98055 162305-9005-0 Alexander, Lester 3205 N.E. 4th St. Renton 98055 162305-91.11-0 0bermeier, Dennis 14403 .S.E. May Valley Rd. Renton! 98056 162305-9112-0 } NAME ADDRESS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER • • . o e CERTIFICATION I, Kulnct., '4 ‘lt,WL , hereby `certify that the above list(s) of adjacent property owners and their addresses were taken from the records of the King County Assessor as prescribed by law. ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me; a Notary Public, in and for the State of •.Washingtoi, residing at Q.fa =on `tn� 'c� 4 day of f}! 1 9 910 y�y L/��7�1/� r^�2i1 Signed:�l 1 CERTIFICATION FOR MAILING I, SclivuleL 4 -er , hereby certify that notices of the public meeting on the subject site plan approval were mailed on 31 eq q p , to each listed adjacent property owner as prescribed by law. ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a Notary Public, in for the State of Washington residing at on the 'J day of 199� Signed: t-r.`,K . c -- , ., �RuErNj Rev10 CERTNOT2.doc4Q . & • ,��P . <cp. A Y$• sr)) S cat PUBLIC '. p9, ,g?A•. O•,• .l ��oi, iiSVP4s0�� NOTICE OF PENDING SITE PLAN APPROVAL , RENTON,WASHINGTON _ I A Site Plan Application has been filed and accepted with the Development Services Division of the City of Renton. The following briefly describes the application and the necessary Public Approvals. DESCRIPTION: RVTI ECF;SA-069-90 The applicant proposes to expand an existing parking lot to include an additional 24 spaces. GENERAL LOCATION: 3000 NE 4TH STREET PUBLIC APPROVALS: Environmental Review Site Plan Approval The application can be reviewed in the Development Services Division located�on the third floor of Renton City-Hall. Comments will be accepted anytime prior to Public Hearings, during Public Hearings, or prior to an administrative site plan approval.. For.further information on the application or dates of final action by the City, please contact the Planning Division,at 235-2550. _ L------ GRAPHIC SCALE N.E. 6th K. 1" 200' < kiwi I I 1 I 1 o' we 200' 300' • f N.E. 6th ST. z P-I ......., ___\0?.; - ? 0 , saez � W ____, im Z / S INGLE I/II <0 IllFAMILY ' HOUSES ' Z4 • 0 Q0 Z W cc ..4.4.• A ceco APARTMENTS ' RENTON VOCATIONAL a .. vu, 40101,ef- §. (TECHNICAL INSTITUTE . a SERVICE 1 'irSTATION F LOCA71ON - Z • IK X i P-1 W' (--- iJ 1 BASE BID f ACCESS EX. PARKING l J r r-APARTMENTS ( 54 ALT. BID 61 FIRE ACCESS ONLY N.E. 4tfi ST. D iN �' 1 l 7......„--- 74.. GREENWOOD 1 CEMETERY , • OF RE �� ti O Ci Q z o � w § . NoTIGE 90 0 0,99Tep SEPZ E�O�P OF PENDING SITE PLAN APPLICATION DESCRIPTION : RVTI ECF;SA-069-90 THE APPLICANT PROPOSES TO EXPAND AN EXISTING PARKING LOT TO INCLUDE AN ADDITIONAL 24 SPACES. GENERAL LOCATION AND/OR A DRESS: 3000 NE 4TH STREET PUBLIC APPROVALS REQUIRED : ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW SITE PLAN APPROVAL PUBLIC COMMENTS WILL BE RECEIVED BY THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT .ANYTIME PRIOR TO PUBLIC HEARINGS AND DURING PUBLIC HEARINGS. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CALL THE CITY OF RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT 235-2550 THIS NOTICE NOT TO BE REMOVED . WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION CERTIFICATION I , / / �/ / ,'HEREBY CERTIFY THAT COPIES OF • THE ABOVE DOCUMEN'� WERE POSTED BY ME IN ,� • CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON OR NEARBY THE DESCRIBED PROPERTY ON ��� 4/2t . ,,001 m..m.,,%,, ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a 0O AET...., �.., Notary Publ'c, in and for the State of Washingo� QQ o . �5S10N o �` �i� residi in on the''7 wyRoNE 'Y� '/'e�7.41 day o G o - ® N PUBLIC : 2: RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF-069-90 APPLICATION NO(S).: SA-069-90 PROPONENT: Renton School District#403 PROJECT TITLE: RVTI BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Expanding an existing parking lot to contain an additional 24 parking spaces. LOCATION: 3000 N.E. 4th TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION l ', CURRENT PLANNING LONG RANGE PLANNING PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P.M. ON July 18, 1990. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: (/�t/'/'C#ll/ APPROVED }( APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED I /f irlotiG�Ge.S Gt i9€Go, " � ����` / %1 e-iX/5 >77 p ,',' ///77 to" his/s 4i%7,p74,rx/ 7 ��G�s SGro '`cear---4 %77. .4,77 �i,� /-4 DATE: 7/ '�71, SIGNATURE OF DIR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 5/90 • RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: DATE CIRCULATED: July 3, 1990 COMMENTS DUE: July 18, 1990 EFC-069-90 APPLICATION NO(S): SA-069-90 PROPONENT: Renton School District#403 PROJECT TITLE: Renton Vocational Technical Institute BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The rehabilitation and expansion of an existing parking area to include an additional 24 parking spaces. LOCATION: 3000 N.E. 4th SITE AREA: 8.2 acres BUILDING AREA (gross): 2.5 acres IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS: PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth 2. Air 3. Water 4. Plants 5. Animals 6. Energy&Natural Resources 7. Environmental Health 8. Land &Shoreline Use 9. Housing 10. Aesthetics 11. Light&Glare 12. Recreation 13. Historic&Cultural Preservation 14. Transportation 15. Public Services 16. Utilities COMMENTS: 11.77;;;,1 We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. /74"// 7/ /r• Signature of Director or t orized Representative Date RENTON ..JMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DE. - .RTMENT ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SH ET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: (At °LiLge.. DATE CIRCULATED: July 3, 1990 ) COMMENTS D E: July 18, 1990 EFC-069-90 APPLICATION NO(S): SA-069-90 PROPONENT: Renton School District#403 PROJECT TITLE: Renton Vocational Technical Institute BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The rehabilitation and expansion of an existing parking area to include an additional 24 parking spaces. LOCATION: 3000 N.E. 4th SITE AREA: 8.2 acres BUILDING AREA (gross): 2.5 acres IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS: PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth 2. Air 3. Water 4. Plants 5. Animals 6. Energy& Natural Resources 7. Environmental Health 8. Land &Shoreline Use 9. Housing 10. Aesthetics 11. Light& Glare 12. Recreation 13. Historic&Cultural Preservation 14. Transportation 15. Public Services 16. Utilities COMMENTS: S We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of proba le impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. 17/5/10 Signature f irector or uthorized Representative Date RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF-069-90 APPLICATION NO(S):: SA-069-90 PROPONENT: Renton School District#403 PROJECT TITLE: RVTI BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Expanding an existing parking lot to contain an additional 24 parking spaces. LOCATION: 3000 N.E. 4th TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF RENTON CURRENT PLANNING JUL 3 1990 LONG RANGE PLANNING VASDhketti D PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P.M. ON July 18, 1990. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: L.x1C ( '. APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED rIce97W rso-c- 08ez ot~ iw - St-re S iocoo up 7,Er isfsteRts To C .C„ ULD' ems. Sq.STeM, ? Atcoe tiyr- C ry) P s Ve2 AC--nun-1 -'"CoP. . yAM)z k,,►,5(, (,S Abe 1>bb\TIN► to- ?/07-40.5 b ev e AS0UE- a215 1 vc.T eiNwv sr V U Chit_ Oct_oPvs1.3G.-( Le L.,9 b6c�P►ws>, I►�c oR�'. 1 D I u b <t rr� DATE: 1/�'/1'o SIGNAT R OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE 111 , C.K.Ot9S En ` s �-•, REV. 5/90 - r RENTOP _ DMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DE RTIVIENT ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: (- 1(.k1 \d i ilc DATE CIRCULATED: July 3, 1990 V COMMENTS DUE: July 18, 1990 EFC-069-90 APPLICATION NO(S): SA-069-90 PROPONENT: Renton School District#403 PROJECT TITLE: Renton Vocational Technical Institute BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The rehabilitation and expansion of an existing parking area to include an additional 24 parking spaces. LOCATION: 3000 N.E. 4th SITE AREA: 8.2 acres BUILDING AREA (gross): 2.5 acres IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS: PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth 2. Air 3. Water 4. Plants 5. Animals 6. Energy& Natural Resources 7. Environmental Health 8. Land &Shoreline Use 9. Housing 10. Aesthetics 11. Light&Glare 12. Recreation 13. Historic& Cultural Preservation 14. Transportation 15. Public Services 16. Utilities COMMENTS: We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact area where additional inf rmation is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Direc pr Authorized Representatite Date c/ ' RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF-069-90 APPLICATION NO(S).: SA-069-90 PROPONENT: Renton School District#403 PROJECT TITLE: RVTI BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Expanding an existing parking lot to contain an additional 24 parking spaces. LOCATION: 3000 N.E. 4th TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT f BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION CURRENT PLANNING LONG RANGE PLANNING PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P.M. ON July 18, 1990. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: /1-3W`atksio V APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED PLANNING DIVISIOA' CITY OF RENTO' JUL m 6 199n /7 f _ C r �4� -- DATE: SIGNATURE OF Cli/RECT 'R OR AUTHO'RIZE'D REPRESENTATIVE / REV. 5/90 RENTOF_ _JMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DE_ _ _RTMENT ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Pk YR- DATE CIRCULATED: July 3, 1990 COMMENTS DUE: July 18, 1990 EFC-069-90 APPLICATION NO(S): SA-069-90 PROPONENT: Renton School District#403 PROJECT TITLE: Renton Vocational Technical Institute BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The rehabilitation and expansion of an existing parking area to include an additional 24 parking spaces. LOCATION: 3000 N.E. 4th SITE AREA: 8.2 acres BUILDING AREA (gross): 2.5 acres IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS: PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth 2. Air 3. Water 4. Plants 5. Animals 6. Energy& Natural Resources 7. Environmental Health 8. Land &Shoreline Use 9. Housing 10. Aesthetics 11. Light&Glare 12. Recreation 13. Historic&Cultural Preservation 14. Transportation 15. Public Services 16. Utilities COMMENTS: We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Da • RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHIMITON FIRE DEPT FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU JUL - si990 ECF-069-90 APPLICATION SA-0690 PROPONENT: Renton School District#403 �+ Y PROJECT TITLE: RVTI BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Expanding an existing parking lot to contain an additional 24 parking spaces. LOCATION: 3000 N.E. 4th TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION 7C FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION CURRENT PLANNING LONG RANGE PLANNING PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P.M. ON July 18, 1990. REVIE ING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: fife: APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF Set ::fir;n''1 JUL 6 'TO G µp DATE: ./4 s ;/9 G SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 5/90 RENTOL_ DMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DE TMENT ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SH ET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: PO-AS DATE CIRCULATED: July 3, 1990 COMMENTS DUE: July 18, 1990 EFC-069-90 APPLICATION NO(S): SA-069-90 PROPONENT: Renton School District#403 PROJECT TITLE: Renton Vocational Technical Institute BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The rehabilitation and expansion of an existing p rking area to include an additional 24 parking spaces. LOCATION: 3000 N.E. 4th SITE AREA: 8.2 acres BUILDING AREA (gross): 2.5 acres IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS: PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth 2. Air 3. Water 4. Plants 5. Animals 6. Energy& Natural Resources 7. Environmental Health 8. Land &Shoreline Use 9. Housing 10. Aesthetics 11. Light&Glare 12. Recreation 13. Historic&Cultural Preservation 14. Transportation 15. Public Services 16. Utilities COMMENTS: /1.er We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of prob ble impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly a sess this proposal. Signature of Director or uthorized Representative Date RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF-069-90 APPLICATION NO(S).: SA-069-90 PROPONENT: Renton School District#403 PROJECT TITLE: RVTI BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Expanding an existing parking lot to contain an additional 24 parking spaces. LOCATION: 3000 N.E. 4th TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION CURRENT PLANNING LONG RANGE PLANNING ?( PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION.OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P.M. ON July 18, 1990. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: Pes-yKS APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED /Ile .,.. .----1•221/-14--e-e PLANNING DIVISION CM/OF RENTON JUL - 91990 it l VED 7-- ��"a DATE: GNATURE OF DIRECTOR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 5/90 • RENTOI` IMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DE RTMENT ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: PO I DATE CIRCULATED: July 3, 1990 COMMENTS DUE: July 18, 1990 • EFC-069-90 • APPLICATION NO(S): SA-069-90 PROPONENT: Renton School District#403 PROJECT TITLE: Renton Vocational Technical Institute BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The rehabilitation and expansion of an existing parking area to include an additional 24 parking spaces. LOCATION: 3000 N.E. 4th SITE AREA: 8.2 acres BUILDING AREA (gross): 2.5 acres IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS: PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth 2. Air 3. Water 4. Plants 5. Animals 6. Energy& Natural Resources 7. Environmental Health 8. Land &Shoreline Use 9. Housing 10. Aesthetics 11. Light&Glare 12. Recreation 13. Historic&Cultural Preservation 14. Transportation 15. Public Services 16. Utilities COMMENTS: I.D62,1 We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. ,..PAUUrg. 'fir b l l(fi qb - Signature of Director or Authorize Representative Date RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF-069-90 APPLICATION NO(S).: SA-069-90 PROPONENT: Renton School District#403 PROJECT TITLE: RVTI BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Expanding an existing parking lot to contain an additional 24 parking spaces. LOCATION: 3000 N.E. 4th TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION CURRENT PLANNING LONG RANGE PLANNING PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P.M. ON July 18, 1990. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED PLANNING DPVPSPoN CITY OF RENTON JUL 1 6 1990 tYr(-4(A/L1( DATE: (51 I (-9 "LV SIGNATURE F DIREC i R OR AtHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 5/90 RENTON. .,JMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DE. ,- RTIVIENT ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: ( KASeC1r A.11,1A, DATE CIRCULATED: July 3, 1990 COMMENTS DUE: July 18, 1990 EFC-069-90 APPLICATION NO(S): SA-069-90 PROPONENT: Renton School District#403 PROJECT TITLE: Renton Vocational Technical Institute BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The rehabilitation and expansion of an existing parking area to include an additional 24 parking spaces. LOCATION: 3000 N.E. 4th SITE AREA: 8.2 acres BUILDING AREA (gross): 2.5 acres IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS: PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth 2. Air 3. Water 4. Plants 5. Animals 6. Energy& Natural Resources 7. Environmental Health 8. Land &Shoreline Use 9. Housing 10. Aesthetics 11. Light&Glare 12. Recreation 13. Historic& Cultural Preservation 14. Transportation 15. Public Services 16. Utilities _ v COMMENTS: /17,e) / /0-2/ <9/6)- -- S We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. 2) Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date 74 gg@glEW2 ENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT JUL 0 3 1990 CITY OF RENTON DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET PUBLIC WORKS CUSTOMER SERVICES ECF-069-90 APPLICATION NO(S).: SA-069-90 PROPONENT: Renton School District#403 PROJECT TITLE: RVTI BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Expanding an existing parking lot to contain an additional 24 parking spaces. LOCATION: 3000 N.E. 4th TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: ENGINEERING DIVISION /( TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION CURRENT PLANNING LONG RANGE PLANNING PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P.M. ON July 18, 1990. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: / \ APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED N6 7-'Ira2.4-._4, /7a t',p4 � ILE' -s az. PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF RENTON [JUL `r 6 1990 ECLgV :tip. i*7 \ , DATE: /1/Y22 SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR .HORIZED REPRESENTATIVE ,14 e 94'/ .)Or° REV. 5/90 RENTOI OMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DE_ _ ,RTMENT ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: S.\-0/1JAN DATE CIRCULATED: July 3, 1990 COMMENTS DUE: July 18, 1990 EFC-069-90 APPLICATION NO(S): SA-069-90 PROPONENT: Renton School District#403 PROJECT TITLE: Renton Vocational Technical Institute BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The rehabilitation and expansion of an existing parking area to include an additional 24 parking spaces. LOCATION: 3000 N.E. 4th SITE AREA: 8.2 acres BUILDING AREA (gross): 2.5 acres IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS: PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth 2. Air 3. Water 4. Plants 5. Animals 6. Energy&Natural Resources 7. Environmental Health 8. Land &Shoreline Use 9. Housing 10. Aesthetics 11. Light&Glare 12. Recreation 13. Historic &Cultural Preservation 14. Transportation 15. Public Services 16. Utilities 4/1 COMMENTS: /h/moo 2 iiy7,4Cr 7 a Lf,- cc) s70AAA D,64(Nz We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. / • 7 7e) Signature of Director or Authorized Represe atIve Date ggemn.a.ENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT JUL 0 3 1990 DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Cl Y OF REiv t ON PUBLIC WORKS CUSTOMS F'l�AVICES APPLICATION NO(S).: SA-069-90 PROPONENT: Renton School District#403 PROJECT TITLE: RVTI BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Expanding an existing parking lot to contain an additional 24 parking spaces. LOCATION: 3000 N.E. 4th TO: • PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION CURRENT PLANNING LONG RANGE PLANNING PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P.M. ON July 18, 1990. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: SlbfLarV\ APPROVED x APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED �. S. C . .f car 7 Sv j A4 r7TE19 TCO /" fic(G c"4/e15- '°:e'P72 "o ( 4#A' ( 4 (- ST4/T o f A "v CcSti ST, v -i cal PLANNING DIVISION cry OF •..� ciu. 'I 6 A)1 DATE: 7—/(p'_ SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTH RIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 5/90 RENTOI DMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DE RTMENT ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: t DATE CIRCULATED: July 3, 1990 COMMENTS DUE: July 18, 1990 EFC-069-90 . APPLICATION NO(S): SA-069-90 PROPONENT: Renton School District#403 PROJECT TITLE: Renton Vocational Technical Institute BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The rehabilitation and expansion of an existing parking area to include an additional 24 parking spaces. LOCATION: 3000 N.E. 4th SITE AREA: 8.2 acres BUILDING AREA (gross): 2.5 acres IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS: PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth 2. Air 3. Water 4. Plants 5. Animals 6. Energy& Natural Resources 7. Environmental Health 8. Land &Shoreline Use 9. Housing 10. Aesthetics 11. Light&Glare 12. Recreation 13. Historic&Cultural Preservation 14. Transportation 15. Public Services 16. Utilities COMMENTS: MU ..7 v14 f rA-C7-5 To I x 15 TANC 4-.%.G�4 sy5 Tt1/4 We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. 7-16-90 Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date U w Rigg2X73 D, N COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT JUL 0 9 1990 DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET CITY OF REN I uel PUBLIC WORKS CLOQt. •_ SERVICES APPLICATION NO(S).: SA-069-90 PROPONENT: Renton School District#403 PROJECT TITLE: RVTI BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Expanding an existing parking lot to contain an additional 24 parking spaces. -- LOCATION: 3000 N.E. 4th TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION CURRENT PLANNING LONG RANGE PLANNING PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT x OTHERS: (A) a iZ, COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P.M. ON July 18, 1990. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: WGt`�V X APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF RENTQN JUL 16 1990 t16-11VD DATE: 7—/ — SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHO IZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 5/90 � r RENTOI DMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DE RTMENT ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: '5exiLye..✓r DATE CIRCULATED: July 3, 1990 COMMENTS DUE: July 18, 1990 EFC-069-90 APPLICATION NO(S): SA-069-90 PROPONENT: Renton School District#403 PROJECT TITLE: Renton Vocational Technical Institute BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The rehabilitation and expansion of an existing parking area to include an additional 24 parking spaces. LOCATION: 3000 N.E. 4th SITE AREA: 8.2 acres BUILDING AREA (gross): 2.5 acres IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS: PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth 2. Air 3. Water 4. Plants 5. Animals 6. Energy&Natural Resources 7. Environmental Health 8. Land &Shoreline Use 9. Housing 10. Aesthetics 11. Light&Glare 12. Recreation 13. Historic&Cultural Preservation 14. Transportation 15. Public Services 16. Utilities COMMENTS: No 124 C r a/V 7/{4 54/t// T 5 W 61e cry refr( We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. 7—/6 — jo Signature of Director or Authorized Repr sentatiVe Date . r J!) RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT JUL 0 3 1990 DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET CITY OF REN i tN PUBLIC WORKS CUSTOMEFMES APPLICATION NO(S).: SA-069-90 PROPONENT: Renton School District#403 PROJECT TITLE: RVTI BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Expanding an existing parking lot to contain an additional 24 parking spaces. LOCATION: 3000 N.E. 4th TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION CURRENT PLANNING LONG RANGE PLANNING PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P.M. ON July 18, 1990. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: X APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED PLANNING DIVISION CITY a:'':?r„-roN Jul . 01990 /9. DATE: 7 -90 SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR A ,HORIZED REPRESENTATIVE • REV. 5/90 46 t% ' '=`' CITE OF RENTON '_1y ?' Public Works Department Earl Clymer, Mayor Lynn Guttmann,Director July 3, 1990 • Mike Yuhl 12828 Northup Way, Suite 300 Bellevue, WA 98005 Subject: Renton Vocational Technical Institute ECF;SA-069-90 Dear Mr. Yuhl: The Planning Division of the City of. Renton has formally accepted the above referenced application for preliminary review. It is tentatively scheduled for consideration by the Technical Advisory Committee on July 27, 1990. Within three days of that review, you will be notified in writing that: 1) your application is complete and has been scheduled for environmental review`and determination, or 2) that additional information is required to continue processing your application"for environmental review. Please contact me, at 235-2550, if you have any questions. Sincerely, /://y/ Mark R. Pywell,'AICP Project Manager MRP/kac 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - ,(206) 235-2631 �•� ° CITY OF RENTON INVOICE I � DATE ACCOUNT • INVOICE� 5/ 27/900 070010 5310 FINANCE DEPT. • 200 MILL AVE. S. • RENTON, WA 98055 DATE ACCOUNT INVOICE CUSTOMER REFERENCE PAYMENT DUE FOR INFORMATION CALL ( ACCOUNT NAME 05/ 27/90 070010 5312 07/17 / 9i Policy Cevclopment - 235-2552 RENTON SCHOOL DISTRICT 4403 SITE PLAN P� R'CING - RVTI COMMUNITY CEVSL0PMENT DEPT Renton School District 4403 12.E N 4th St 000 00C 00 345 S1 00 07 Penton we. 9C55 75 .00 �! ttn MaintenFnce 000 C00 00 345 31 00 18 320 . 00 000 000 0.� 369 90 00 1 S 27. 00 DESCRIPTION AMOUNT ' Environment,.1 Review Fees 75 . 00 Site P1e'n Aporov_d 320.O0 oostege ( 54 $. 25 X 2 mailins ) 27 . 00 Tot-,1 Amou', t Due 922 . 00 TOTAL INVOICE ') 22 . O3 J FILE COPY • . R RE. . ...................................:::::::::::::::::::::.. ::<:>::::>:<::::::>::::::::;<»::>:.>::::::<:::>::»><:<:::»> :::.>:.;:.;:.>:•:�:.;:.:.CO.. .Mi]�IT"I'�;D�.. L .P E . ..D pAR . ......................... .... N ER. NAME: Renton School District #403 _'REZONE $ _SPECIAL PERMIT $ _TEMPORARY PERMIT $ ADDRESS: 435 Main Avenue South CC NDITIONAL USE PERMIT V $ ITE PLAN APPROVAL $el, o _SPECIAL PERMIT $ CITY: Renton ZIP: 98055 _GRADE&FILL PERMIT $ (NO.CU.YDS: ) —*VARIANCE $ TELEPHONE NUMBER 235-2200 (FROM SECTION: ) `WAIVER $ _ROUTINE VEGETATION ••TACT.PE.RSON: APP:L1. AN T;;.;;;;;;:.>:. MANAGEMENT PERMIT $, NAME: Mike Yuhl ('JUSTIFICATION REQUIRED) ADDRESS: 12828 Northup Way Suite 300 SUBDIVISION: $ _LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT $ CITY: Bellevue ZIP: 98005 SHORT PLAT $ TENTATIVE PLAT $ _PRELIMINARY PLAT $ TELEPHONE NUMBER 641-2886 _FINAL PLAT $ NO.OF LOTS: PLAT NAME: • FQ.RMATIO:N:.> PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAME: ' PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: $ RVTI - New Parking _PRELIMINARY FINAL PROPERTY/PROJECT ADDRESS(S)/LOCATION: 3000 N.E.. 4th Renton BINDING SITE PLAN: $ KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER(S): 723650-0525-0 MOBILE HOME PARKS: $ _TENTATIVE EXISTING LAND USE(S): _PRELIMINARY , \ • School FINAL • PARK NAME: EXISTING ZONING: NO.OF SPACES: P-1 — . . . V_ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW • $ �/D T 1 5.C PROPOSED LAND USE(S): PROJECT VALUE: $ L [D/MD School SENSITIVE AREA: /vO APA: _1 2 OTHER _N/A SEWER MORATORIUM AREA: YES _NO PROPOSED ZONING: P-1 po 1(o(a • TOTAL FEES: $e7,f,7vZ ®I) SPIT AREA(SQ.FT.OR ACREAGE): DATE PAID: 8.2 acres POSTAGE PROVIDED: NO .......P.!. • duo c:n�Urcacs►� s n •e 'le ''d:: �•I . f•: b �:s a Y� .Y. .. . ........... ............... ... E@F:�.<:• A�:>;;R;:>:::: I IET:::>::::C•��::sLIA::�>::>EP.::::>::F1?::::'I'P•»:::> P :?>R�.�.: • .::::::::»:.<• : .... .................................................................... ....:.. . ::::;:::V::::AA .....W...::P � D:;::.:FP[ID::•::.:SM:z:::• M��>:.;:BM�:.;;;::� ' p.:>:.:$ P;•>:.>:::.::•: >::.>:.>:•::;.;:.;;::.;::.:.......:....................................................... .:..:..•. L. .E S.CRIP.TI.O.N..O.F..P.RO or. ..... ...............................................::. Block 20 of the Plat of Renton Highlands #2 as recorded in Volume 57, pg_ 98, RPrnrric of King County.. • • I, Rick Stracke , being duly sworn, declare that I am (please check one) g the authorized representative to act for the property owner,_ the owner of the property involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to'the best of my knowledge and belief. SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS `,ae DAY OF 19 yD • NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, RESIDING AT: (Name of iv.,"'ublic) (Signature of Owner) 435 Main Ave. So. 1220 No. 4th St. (Address) (Address) Renton, WA 98055 Renton, WA 98055 (City/State/Zip) (City/State/Zip) ( 206 ) 235-2340 ( 206 ) 235-2326 (Telephone) (Telephone) Acceptance of this application and required filing fee does not constitute a complete application. Plans and other material required to constitute a complete application are listed in the"Application Procedure." .RinMasir 2/90 -a( °l--lb c CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTALCHECKLIST:. . . Purpose of Checklist: The State Environmenta➢ Policy Act (SEPA), Chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probably significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. Instructions for Applicants: This environmental checklist ask you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply". Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impacts. Use of Checklist for Nonproiect Proposals: (Please Type or Print Legibly) Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply". IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D). For nonproject actions (actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs), the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affectedgeographic area " res respectively. � P y• A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: RVTI East Parking Area Rehabilitation & Addition 2. Name of applicant: Renton School Distri:ct #403 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: 435 Main Ave. South Renton, WA 98055 4. Date checklist prepared: April 25, 1990 Attn: Rick Stracke 235-2326 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Renton PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF RENTON JUN 2 61990 -2- ,. 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): .' Start after June 8, 1990 Complete by October 1, 1990 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansions, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. No 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. None 9. , Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. No 10. List any governmental approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. City of Renton Building Permit 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. Add new pavement for 20 parking places. Seal and restore existing 190 ft. x 530 ft. parking lot. Improve parking lot entrance. RVTI site is approx. 30 acres. 12. , Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topography map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. NE corner of N.E. 4th Street & Monroe Ave. N.E. i.n the SW4 of Section 9, Township 23 North, Range 5 East W.M. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS . Earth a. General description of the site (circle one) flat rolling, hilly, steep, slopes, mountainous, other b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope?) 2% c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, scaly, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. Sand and Gravel d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. No -3- e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. Remove ±120 cu. yds. unsuited soil and import approx. 66 cu. yds. of sand & gravel and 22 cu. yds. of crushed rock from an approved pit. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. Yes, however the small areas and flat slopes make significant erosion unlikely. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? Present area unknown, h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: Follow City erosion control procedures. 2. AIR a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Minimal dust and the usual construction equipment emissions will occur during construction. b. Are there any off-site sources of emission? No c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: Schedule work activities to minimize dust. 3. WATER a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. No 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. No 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. None 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. No 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. None -4- b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water .be'discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. None c. Water Runoff (including storm water): I) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters, If so, describe. Varying quanti ties,.:of storm water will be collected by shaping the new pavement to flow to existing drains. Water will then flow in existing storm drains to Cedar River to Lake Washington. 2) Could waste material enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. Not Likely d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: None 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other X evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other X shrubs X grass crop or grain wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants: water lily, eel grass, milfoil, other other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Grass will be removed. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measure to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: None 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: Birds: hawk, heron, eagle,�songbirds other Mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other Fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other -5- b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain No d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: None 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, wood, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. None b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: None 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. Not likely 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. None likely 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: Follow existing requirements and usual construction practices. b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the areas which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? None 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Usual construction equipment noise will occur during normal work hours. Usual car noises would come from the proposal - usually during school hours 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: None 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Vocational school ; a single family residence North and West; single, multifamily and commerical to East and commercial to South. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. No • -6- c. Describe any structures on the site. School Buildings d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? No e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? P-1 f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? P-1 g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Does not apply. h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. No i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? None - project would provide additional on-site parking for present users. j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: None 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: None 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. None b. Approximately how many units, If any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: None 10. Aesthetics • a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed. 0 as the proposal is a parking lot. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: None 11. Light and Glare -7- _ a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? None b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: None 12. Recreation a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? None b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: None 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. No b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. No c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: None -8- 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. Three driveways to Monroe Ave. East would remain in use. b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? Yes, in front. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? 348 in Parking Lot plus 20 added spaces. It would eliminate none. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private? No e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. No f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. None, as the proposal is to better serve the existing users by adding to on-site parking. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: None 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. Not likely b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. None 16. Utilities a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricit atural gas water • refuse service elephone sanitary sewer septic system, other. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the Immediate vicinity which might be needed. None • -9- C. SIGNATURE ' I, the undersigned, state that to a best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Renton School District #403 Proponent: Yuhl & Associates by Name Printed: Michael H. Yuhl -10- - , D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (This sheet should only be used for actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs. Do not use this sheet for project actions.) Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms. 1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life? r measures toprotect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are: Proposed easu s 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: 4. , How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive)areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? • • ATTACHMENT A To Application for City of Renton Site Plan Approval Note: Renton Vocational Technical Institute is constructed on Block 16A, 17, 18, 19 & 20 of the Plat of Renton Highlands #2. The legal description of the block on which the work is being constructed is as follows: Block 20 of the Plat of Renton Highlands #2 as recorded in Volume 57, page 98, Records of King County. tAi - - GRAPHIC SCALE11 N.F. 6th PL. Z 1" 200' - ___: W < Milli I I I 1 1 O. 100' 200' 300' i N.E. 6th ST. _ r - 1 z r _ i • a P-I Q ?.--1 ? 0i ..:.. ill * m ; II .i SINGLEFAMILY o SP HOUSES ILI lc et X i t A � j o 1 441111111:)111111c a z_ w 4,W Y � or , cc '�" o APARTMENTS 4 RENTON VOCATIONAL r �' °F-N� y� TECHNICAL INSTITUTE w La 0 SERVICE a STATION k,(' 4 LOCATION OF WORK z • cn X P_1 w 1 II BASE BID ACCESS EX. PARKING o �- APARTMENTS - s )4 ALT. BID I 1 � FIRE ACCESS ONLY N.E 4th ST. D .. • ; GREENWOOD a CEMETERY N 4 YUHL & (206) 641-2886 /► 12828 NORTHUP WAY ASSOCIATES BELLEVUE, WA 98005 June 15, 1990 PGA o��°c o 61590 04 City of Renton � 200 Mill South �U' Renton, WA 98055 Dear sirs: 1. Attached are two applications for Site Plan approval for Renton School District. At the RVTI Main Campus, the District is planning to add 24 new parking places between a driveway and the building. At Sartori, the District is planning to add 76 new on-site parking places. These parking places are to handle the District's present program needs. 2. Our calculation of the fees are as follows: On RVTI @ 4000' N.E. 4th, the value of the new parking places is under $10,000 so the fee is $ 75 The site plan approval fee based on a site less than 1 acre. 820 Postage costs are 27 On Sartori, the estimated value of the new parking lot for fee purposes is $70,000. 67 Grading Permit 325 The site of the parking area is 0.9 acres and therefore the site plan approval fee is 820 Postage costs are 19 $2,153 3. Please note that these plans shown additional work going on at the school that is not covered in the application. This work is normal pavement restoration work that the District routinely accomplishes during the summer. The District believes no permit is required for the work which will occur during this summer. The work covered under the permits is for parking in new areas. The new impervious surface at RVTI is under 3000 sq. ft. and therefore we understand no retention is required. Storm water retention is provided at Sartori, not only for the new work as required by Renton's Regulations, but we have retrofitted to provide retention for the existing paved areas where none existed before. Four copies of the drainage calculations are attached as requested. 4. Driveway - Please note that at RVTI we are proposing to remove the hump in the present main access driveway as our experience has been that this is creating a use problem as longer vehicles bottom out. Sincerely yours, Michael H. uhl, P.E. • Enclosures as Listed MHY:c II it ' it r i,. it ' I PROJECT NARRATIVE Application for Site Plan Approval Applicant: Renton School District #403 Project: Renton Vocational Technical School (RVTI) This project involves expanding a present asphalt area to be suitable for the parking of 24 cars for school staff. PLd`{ViL"DNG DIVISION cITy OF REP$TON JUN 2 6 7990 RVTI - Statement in Response to Question 10 Estimate Quantities and types of material involved: 120 cu. yds. of existing topsoil will be removed from site. 95 cu. yds. of gravel base will be imported. The hours will be between 7 a.m. and 6 p.m. Monday through Friday. The time of completion is estimated to be 60 days after a permit is issued, weather permitting. There is no phasing. The material will be hauled in along N.E. 4th Street. Other routes are unknown as it depends upon the contractor's source of material. Minimizing of impacts of mud would be achieved by following usual erosion control procedures. Dust would be minimized by wetting or modification of equipment procedures. Noise could not be minimized as the construction will require the use of ordinarily muffled construction equipment. PINING DIVISION CITY OF RE TON JUN 2 .6 1990 , i ' I [ I- I I- I I I I ' GRAPHIC SCALE N.E. IS Pl. tai i i 1" = 200' - Him I I I I 1 I too' Zoo' 301r 1 `ig ' N.E. ath sr. r z " Z iv rI I 144)• '� -4 4-.(/)-- i PI I.i i 41 i i , IF rl &.... 1 c , C RENTON VOCATIONAL ° TECHNICAL INSTITUTE orlitt:of 1 LFFAORN OF WORK _y f _ BASE BID j l� s 1 ALT. BID 4 t . - 0 N.E 4th ST. N DIVIEIONI�.s.; 4PLAN CITY OF RENITON! a J 1\1 2 6 1990 rail.zGIENV r� - 4 • • PLANNING & ZONING FEES • - NAME: f SO it 403 PROJECT: izki'-r i sot, lcu, J pyl V e,ti To 1" Ocpciry 10�, PG-'�K,t a D.e s.cr i t i :..:•;.:..:; . ..... .........:..::.::::::.:..::..::.:.:::'.:P...:::::>;:<:.::.::.;:;::;:::.;.:;.:::::•;:: ::�:.;::. :•:;;::�:;:•<::Rev;e.ri.u•e;.Aeco:unt;:::�::>:::;>;::::»:::<;:::;Amoun ::'::::><•:;::::::: Annexation Fees 000/000/345.8.1.00.02 Appeals & Waivers 000/000/345.81.00.03 Binding Site Plan/Short Plat • 000/000/345.81.00.04 Comprehensive Plan Amendment • 000/000/345.81 .00.05 Conditional Use Fees 000/000/34.5.81.00.06 Environmental Review Fees 000/000/345.81.00.07 '75. Q() Preliminary Plat 000/000/345.81 .00.08 50% Final Plat (General Fund) 000/000/345.81 .00.09 50% Final Plat (Park Fund) 101/000/345.81.00.00 . Final/Preliminary PUD 000/000/345.81.00.10 Grading & Filling Fees 000/000/345.81.00.11 Lot Line Adjustment 000/000/845.81 .00.12 Mobile Home Parks ' 000/000/345.81.00.13 Rezone 000/0.00/345.81.00.14 Routine Vegetation Mgmt Fees 000/000/345.81.00.15 Shoreline Substantial Dev Fees 000/000/345.81.00.16 Site Plan Approval 000/000/345.81.00.17 Special/Temporary Review Fees . 000/000/345.81 .00.18 Variance Fees 000/000/345.81.00.19 Other Misc Planning/Zoning Fees 000/000/345.81 .00.20 Maps 000/000/341 .50.00.00 • 7041 Photo Copies 000/000/341.60.00.24 Publications 000/000/341.60.00.24 • Postage 4- 0 .25-(P X 2. iftsettilf 000/000/369.90.00.18 ..OD 7055 Sales Tax .000/000/231 .70.00.00 9998 ' • BY: ' DATE: CITY OF RENTON MEMORANDUM DATE: November 26, 1990 P-A d�iIN DIvvsI®N TO: All Reviewing Departments ��� or Rs�ro FROM: Mark R. Pywell,AICPNov 0ils90 Project Manager 1� i ,al Vj SUBJECT: Chevron Service Station CU;ECF-096-90 Attached is a revised site plan for the project listed above. Please check your comments to ensure that they are relevant to the revised project. If you have any new comments please write them on the bottom of this memo and return it to me. If I do not receive any new comments by December 14, 1990 it will be assumed that the existing comments are adequate. If you have any questions please contact me at extension 6167. 14 • ♦ j\U1 \./1 C�� �I f to ' ` " CITY F RENTON rein Hearing Examiner Earl Clymer, Mayor Fred J.Kaufman August 2, 1991 Gary Williamson Chevron USA, Inc. P. 0. Box 220 Seattle, WA 98.111 RE: Chevron - 301 South Grady Way File No. CU-096-90 - Dear Mr. Williamson: The Examiner' s Report regarding the referenced application which was published July 18, 1991 has not been appealed within the 14-day period established by ordinance. Therefore, this matter is considered final ) and is being transmitted to the City Clerk this date for filing. Please feel free to contact this office if further assistance or information is required. Sincerely, . - FRED J. KAUFMAN HEARING EXAMINER FJK:dk cc: City Clerk Building Division Planning Division 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2593 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING STATE OF WASHINGTON ) )ss . County. of King ) DOTTY KLINGMAN being first duly sworn, upon oath, deposes and states: That on the 18th day of July 1991 affiant deposited in the mails of the United States a sealed envelope containing a decision or reconnnendation with postage prepaid, addressed to the parties of record in the below entitled application or petition. SUBSCRIBED AND , SWORN to before me this f ° day of U� h , 1991,. LIA-CYL Notary u lic in and for the State of Washington , residinc Ki vLq (O L)..,n,v , therein. Application, Petition, or Case VV; CU-096-91 - CHEVRON USA, Inc. (The minutes contain a list of the parties of.record.) 4. , July 18, 1991 OFFICE OF THE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND DECISION APPLICANT: CHEVRON USA, INC. File No: CU-096-90 LOCATION: 301 South Grady Way SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Conditional Use to convert an existing full-service station to a fueling station and convenience store. There will be four fuel dispensers and the replacement of three steel storage tanks with three new 12,000 gallon double wall underground fuel storage tanks. SUMMARY OF ACTION: Planning Division Recommendation: Approval, with conditions. PLANNING DIVISION REPORT: The Planning Division Report was received by the Examiner on June 25, 1991 PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Planning Division Report, examining available information on file with the application, and field checking the property and surrounding area, the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: MINUTES The hearing was opened on July 2, 1991 at 9:00 A.M. in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. • The following exhibits were entered into the record: Exhibit #1 - Yellow File containing application, proof of posting and publication and other documentation pertinent to this request. Exhibit #2 - Neighborhood Map • Exhibit #3 - Site Plan with Landscaping Exhibit #4 - Elevations (a) and (b). The hearing opened with a presentation of the staff report by SENIOR PLANNER, LENORA BLAUMAN. A review of her comments follows. The applicant wishes to remodel an existing service station, add a convenience store, replace three existing pumps with new double-wall underground storage tanks and eliminate now-existing service repair bays. The site is approximately one-half acre and is located along Grady Way in the Renton Village Shopping Center. Planner Blauman noted the loss of the service bays is desirable and should reduce noise and congestion in the area. It is anticipated there will be about 200 new vehicle trips per day from this site. The site is in the 100 year flood plain and is subject to flooding. Plans are being made to address this situation in the foreseeable future. Soils tests have been completed and there is no indication of contaminated soil on the site. If, during construction, any contaminated soil is found then construction will have to be stopped until a soils remediation plan can be presented to, and accepted by the city. Planner Blauman continued stating the ERC reviewed this proposal and issued a determination of Non- Significance, mitigated. The application was conditioned to present an amended landscape plan, an agreement addressing soils testing, a Hold Harmless agreement regarding impacts to earth and storm water management, provide a traffic mitigation fee, and submit a construction management plan. There were also five (5) notes attached to the ERC conditions reminding the applicant of other requirements/permits that will be necessary for this proposal. The applicant has accepted the mitigated measures as written. CHEVRON USA, INC. CU-096-90 July 18, 1991 Page 2 i H A review was given of this project's compliance with the Conditional Use Ordinance criteria. The proposal complies with conditions calling for compatibility with surrounding land uses; the remodeling would allow an activity consistent with commercial uses permitted by the Comprehensive Plan; access 'I would be provided from Grady Way; walkways will be provided on the south and west boundaries of the site; it is felt there is a community need; the location is suited for the proposed use; parking will be increased from 4 to 5 spaces; and the proposal meets height standards and lot coverage. With the city widening of Grady Way, landscaping on this site may eventually be removed but this has not been further discussed as yet. Noise, light and glare were considered by staff because of the site's proximit to Grady Way and I-405 with staff requesting the use of solar tinted glass in the proposed building. Ms. Blauman said a revised landscape plan has been submitted, and drainage plans will have to comply with King County Surface Water Manual requirements. Concluding, Blauman noted staff's recommendation of approval for this request and read the recommended conditions into the record ' calling for compliance with ERC conditions, use of non-reflective glass on the building, drainage plans to'meet city and King County requirements, and compliance with construction standards. It was recommended this permit expire within two years from the date of approval unless the applicant has begun construction. Responding on behalf of the applicant was GARY WILLIAMSON, Property Development Specialist, P.O. Box 220, Seattle, 98111. Mr. Williamson advised the facilities are approximately 26 years old and need, to be remodeled. He said with the new look the facilities will add to the aesthetics of the community, meet community needs, and meet the city's image standards for the community. He said the applicant agrees with the conditions of approval recommended by staff and will comply with same. Also testifying for the applicant was JAY HUMMEL who spoke to the use of monitors and/or alarms for the underground storage tanks. He said the storage tanks and gasoline lines are both double-walled; there'I are various systems in place for monitoring leaks in lines, a system between tanks to detect leaks, a tank level monitor system to monitor level of product within the tank, and monitors for the secondary', wall for the product pipe. He also said the tanks have a device to hold them down in the ground in case of flooding in the area. Responding to a question from the Examiner regarding the need for a convenience store at the.site (with a large supermarket close by), MR. WILLIAMSON said research by' Chevron found that even though there is a supermarket close-by it was felt customers coming in for gasoline would make small purchases in the convenience store at the same time as opposed to taking additional time to drive across the lot to a larger store for only small, convenient items. He felt the community would support this type of convenience store. The Examiner requested one additional week to issue a decision in this matter due to the long holiday weekend. There was no objection from the applicant. He called for further testimony regarding this project. There was no one else wishing to speak, and no further comments from staff. The hearing closed at 9:50 A.M. FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & DECISION: Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: 1. The applicant, Chevron USA, Inc., filed a request for approval of a Conditional Use Permit to extensively remodel an existing gasoline service station. 2. The yellow file containing the staff report, the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) documentation and other pertinent materials was entered into the record as Exhibit #1. 3. The Environmental Review Committee (ERC), the City's responsible official, issued a Declaration of Non-Significance - Mitigated (DNS-M) for the subject proposal. 4. The subject proposal was reviewed by all departments with an interest in the matter. 5. The subject site is located at 301 South Grady Way. The site is located at the northern perimeter of the Renton Village Shopping Center, just west of Lake Avenue South. 6. The level site is approximately 24,295 square feet in area. The site is shaped like a trapezoid with Grady Way forming the northern side of the trapezoid. The Grady Way frontage is 150 feet in length. The east property line is approximately 181.15 feet long. The south and west 'I property lines are approximately 146.73 feet long and 150 feet long, respectively. 7. The subject site was initially annexed to the city with the adoption of Ordinance 1547 adopted,' in May, 1956. 8. The site is currently zoned B-1 (Business/Commercial). CHEVRON USA, INC. CU-096-90 July 18, 1991 Page 3 • 9. The map element of the Comprehensive Plan designates the area in which the subject site is located as suitable for the development of commercial uses, but does not mandate such development without consideration of other policies of the Plan. 10. The applicant proposes abandoning its full service automobile maintenance facilities and operating bays. In its place the applicant proposes concentrating on gasoline sales and convenience store operations. The renovation would also replace the existing underground gasoline storage tanks with a newer vintage design that incorporates double-wall tanks, delivery lines and fittings, and monitoring and leak'detection equipment that prevent or detect gasoline l leaks. 11. The new convenience store will be located in the center of the parcel. The building will have Ia footprint of approximately 25 by 50 feet. The pumps will be located north and south of the sales area under.a 45 foot by 92 foot canopy. 12. The building containing the store will be 12 feet high. The canopy will be 18 feet high. 13. The existing tanks will be removed and replaced by three (3) 12,000 gallon, double-wall underground gasoline storage tanks. 14. An approximately 7 foot 9 inch by 24 foot utility building containing storage and public rest rooms will be located at the southwest corner of the site. ' An area near the southeast corner of the site will provide patrons with air and water for limited servicing. 15. Access to the site is via four driveways. Two driveways are located along the west property line and one each along the south and east property line. There will be no direct access to the site from Grady Way. 16. The applicant proposes landscaping the entire perimeter of the site. Along the Grady Way frontage the landscaping will range from approximately twenty feet deep to approximately forty feet deep. The landscaping along Grady will be a mix of lawn, shrubs and flowering plants. Red oaks will be planted along the east and south margins of the site. Additional shrubs will he located along the east, south and west edges of the site. A sidewalk will be incorporated in the landscaping along both the north (Grady) and the west margin of the site (Lake). 17. In addition to the tank and delivery piping protection systems, the canopy area will have a segregated storm water area to contain spills and routines drips. Water from this area will be delivered to the sanitary sewer system. 18. The service station is on the north perimeter of the Renton Village Shopping Center which contains both retail shopping stores and office buildings. • 19. ' North of the site are commercial uses and north of the Grady commercial uses are residential uses. I-405 is located south of the shopping center. The nearest gasoline station is approximately a half mile from the subject site. 20. The surrounding area is subject to periodic flooding. The ERC required a hold harmless agreement from the applicant to protect the city if the site is redeveloped. In addition, the applicant has taken precautions to assure that the underground tanks will be appropriately anchored and not be dislocated during flood situations. 21. The applicant will be contributing approximately $10,000 to the Grady Way Transportation Benefit Zone to offset the increase in traffic of approximately 220 new traffic trips to the existing count of approximately 980 trips that the existing station has generated. Staff has not required any additional street widening or turn lanes adjacent to the subject site. 22. The conditional use permit requires that the permit be used within a limited time frame or it expires of its own, accord. ' CONCLUSIONS 1. The applicant for a Conditional Use Permit must demonstrate that the use is in the public interest, will not impair the health, safety or welfare of the general public and is in compliance with the criteria found in Section 4-31-36 (C) which provides in part that: a. The proposal generally conforms with the Comprehensive Plan; b. There is a general community need for the proposed use at the proposed location; CHEVRON USA, INC. CU-096-90 • July 18, 1991 Page 4 c. There will be no undue impacts on adjacent property; d. The proposed use is compatible 'in scale with the adjacent residential uses, if any; e. Parking, unless otherwise permitted, will not occur in the required yards; f. Traffic and pedestrian circulation will be safe and adequate for the proposed project; g. Noise, light and glare will not cause an adverse affect on neighboring property; h. Landscaping shall be sufficient to buffer the use from rights-of-way and neighboring property where appropriate; and i. Adequate public services are available to serve the proposal. The requested conditional use appears justified. 2. The proposed gas station and convenience store conform to the Comprehensive Plan's designation of the site for commercial uses. In keeping with the prominent location of the site, the applicant has proposed extensive landscaping along the Grady frontage and along the remaining boundaries of the site. Since the site contains only two relatively small buildings most of the landscaping will be visible from the street and shopping center. The enhanced, redeveloped use will provide a pleasant gateway to this area of the city. 3. The redevelopment of the gas station should not change the appropriateness of the station to this site. The nearest station is approximately a half mile from the subject site. In fact, another gasoline station located in the same shopping center was removed within the last year. Presumably the applicant has analyzed the competitive advantage to redeveloping on the same site. While the convenience store aspect of the proposal immediately adjacent to a full service supermarket seems unusual, the "quick stop" aspect does appeal to some shoppers. 4. ' The redevelopment, with the enhanced landscaping, should not have any undue impact on adjacent property. The existing station has not shown itself to be an inappropriate neighbor, and the newly renovated station should be similarly acceptable. The modern containment standards and monitoring equipment should prevent any undue impacts caused by gasoline spills or leaks. The location, along Grady Way, a major arterial, is well suited for the station. • 5. The site is not immediately adjacent to any residential uses, but in any event, the one-story sales building and the approximately two-story canopy are well within the height limits of the B-1 Zone and are certainly compatible with adjacent development. 6. The parking and circulation patterns appear appropriate for the.site. The applicant has linked the station/convenience store with the adjoining shopping center by a sidewalk. Similarly the site is linked to the street by a sidewalk within a landscaped frontage. 7. The applicant will be contributing to the Grady Way Benefit District which should offset some of the additional traffic impacts that the additional trips will generate. Easements for access have been provided to the ERC's satisfaction. 8. The proposed use should not create any undue impacts because of noise, light or glare. The elimination of the service bays should actually reduce overall noise, although the additional traffic the convenience store is expected to generate would probably balance this reduction. The staff recommendation that non-glare glass be used on all glazed surfaces is reasonable to prevent glare and reflection from spilling over onto the Grady Way arterial. 9. The site is well landscaped. Those areas not given over to paving and buildings will receive landscape treatment. Both street trees and ground covers will soften the site and integrate it with the adjacent redeveloping shopping center. 10. The upgrading of the storm water systems serving this area should accommodate this new redevelopment. The eventual improvement of Grady Way should relieve some of the traffic congestion in this area. All in all, the site is reasonably well served by the city's utility infrastructure. 11. In conclusion, the proposed redevelopment of the subject site, particularly the greatly enhanced landscaping on the perimeter of the site, is a welcome change for this area. CHEVRON USA, INC. CU-096-90 July 18, 1991 Page 5 DECISION The Conditional Use Permit is approved subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant shall comply with the conditions imposed by the ERC. 2. The applicant shall use non-glare glass on exterior surfaces. 3. The applicant shall comply with the city's storm water management regulations, including regulations intended to deal with leaks and leak prevention. ORDERED THIS 18th day of July, 1991. FRED J. K FMAN HEARING E AMINER TRANSMITTED THIS 18th day of July, 1991 to the parties of record: Gary Williamson Chevron USA, Inc. Property Development Specialist P. O. Box 220 Seattle, WA 98111 Jay Hummel P. O. Box 220 Seattle, WA 98111 TRANSMITTED THIS 18th day of July, 1991 to the following: Mayor Earl Clymer Councilman Richard M. Stredicke Don Erickson, Zoning Administrator Lynn A. Guttmann, Administrator Members, Renton Planning Commission Jim Hanson, Development Services Manager Gary Gotti, Fire Marshal Ronald Nelson, Building Director Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Jay Covington, Mayor's Executive Assistant Transportation Systems Division Valley Daily News Utilities System Division Pursuant to Title IV, Chapter 8, Section 15 of the City's Code, request,for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 P.M. August 1, 1991. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is ambiguous or based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for a review by the Examiner within fourteen (14) days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific ambiguities or errors discovered by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record, take further action as he deems proper. An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Chapter 8, Section 16, which requires that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk, accompanying a filing fee of $75.00 and meeting other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection or purchase in the Finance Department, first floor of City Hall. The Appearance of Fairness Doctrine provides that no ex parte (private one-on-one) communications may occur concerning pending land use decisions. This means that parties to a land use decision may not communicate in private with any decision-maker concerning the proposal. Decision-makers in the land use process include both the Hearing Examiner and members of the City Council. All communications concerning the proposal must be made in public. This public communication permits all interested parties to know the contents of the communication and would allow them to openly rebut the evidence. Any violation of this doctrine would result in the invalidation of the request by the Court. The Doctrine applies not only to the initial public hearing but to all Requests for Reconsideration as well as Appeals to the City Council. F//? • • • DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED MITIGATION MEASURES PROJECT: Fueling Facility&Retail Bldg. PROPONENT: Chevron USA ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST: ECF-096-90 APPLICATION NUMBER: CU-096-90 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Applicant seeks to convert an existing full service station with to a fueling station with a convenience store on a 24,295 sf lot. The existing auto maintenance bays will be eliminated. Construction includes a single-story 1,250 s.f. retail bldg., 186 s.f. utility bldg, four fuel dispensers, and replacing three 12,000 gallon steel storage tanks with three new 12,000 gallon double wall underground fuel storage tanks. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 301 South Grady Way CONDITIONS: The Environmental Review Committee issued a Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated with the following conditions: 1. The applicant shall, in order to mitigate aesthetic impacts of the project, submit an amended landscaping plan. This plan shall provide the following Items: a) a five foot wide landscape area and a five foot wide sidewalk along the south and west boundary of the project, b) an enhanced landscaping plan along S. Grady Way and c) a twenty foot long extension of the landscaping strip on the easterly side of the project site to bring the landscaping northerly, approximately even with the front portion of the proposed structure. This plan shall be submitted to the satisfaction of the Development Planning Section prior to the public hearing by the Hearing Examiner. • 2. The applicant 'shall provide an agreement ensuring that: a) complete soils testing will be conducted in accordance with the State Department of Ecology standards; b) if during construction of these facilities contaminated soils are found, all construction will cease Immediately; c), within one week of discovering the contaminated;soils, the applicant shall submit copies of a soils remediation plan to the satisfaction of the Fire Prevention Bureau and the Department of Planning/Building/Public Works prior to the resumption of any work on the site; d) State Department of Ecology approval will be,required for remediation activities; and e) that all commercial and Industrial activities within 300 feet of the project site are notified of the soils remediation plan and provided with a schedule of events. The agreement shall be submitted to the satisfaction of the Department of Planning/Building/Public Works prior to the issuance of any site preparation/building permits for this project. Note: 2.1 The contaminated soils may either be disposed of In an approved waste site outside of the City of Renton or treated on site. 3. The applicant shall, In order to address Impacts to earth and storm water management, provide a "hold harmless" agreement which acknowledges that the City has Informed the applicant that the subject property Is located In an area which may be included In an existing/altered 100 year flood plain, and that the applicants have decided to proceed, at their own volition, thereby waiving their rights to hold the municipality liable for any flooding and/or for any damages to property or person - arising from such flooding. This document is to be approved by the City Attorney, and to be duly recorded prior to the Issuance of site preparation/building permits. mitmeas- 1 • 4. The applicant shall, in order to mitigate the Impacts of increased traffic on area roads, provide the following mitigation fee of $9,900.00 (220 trips X $45 per trip) for the Grady Way TBZ prior to the Issuance of site preparation/building permits. Note: The fee Is based on the following: Trip Generation PM peak hour existing service station trips 108 • PM peak hour convenience store trips 130 PM peak hour trip generation difference +22 (To convert from peak hour trips the ITE K-factor of.10 was used.) Daily Trip Generation Difference +220 220 Daily Trips X$45 per driveway trip = $9,900 The fee shall be deposited to account number 105/572/318.70.00.67 Grady Way TBZ/Chevron Facility 5. The applicant, in order to mitigate construction-related impacts (e.g., noise, dust, traffic) shall submit a construction management plan including the following; a) an erosion control element; b) an element for the periodic watering of any disturbed soil on the site to reduce dust; c) an element for the limiting of hauling operations to the hours between 8:30 A.M. and 3:30 P.M.; d) an element for the protection of the existing storm drains from soils on site disturbed by construction activities; and e) a$2,000.00 cash deposit for street cleaning. This plan shall be submitted to the satisfaction of the Development Services Department of Planning/Building/Public Works prior to the issuance of site preparation/building permits and implemented throughout the construction phase of this project. NOTES: • . • A. The applicant will need to apply for permits from the Fire Prevention Bureau for the removal of the existing underground storage tanks and the installation of the new tanks. B. The applicant will need to submit a sign plan for any new signs for the proposed development prior to the Issuance of building permits. C. The applicant will need for provide storm drainage in accordance with the King County Utility Serv ices Di vision of the Surface Water Design Manual to the satisfaction of the U y Department of Planning/Building/Public Works: D. ' The applicant will need to provide a six foot wide sidewalk along S. Grady Way and replace the existing street light In accordance with the City of Renton Municipal Code. E. The applicant shall provide drainage plans for the proposed development in accordance with the King County Surface Water Design Manual to the satisfaction of the Storm Water Section of the Department of Planning/Building/Public Works. The drains for the fueling stations will need to be tight lined to the sanitary sewer with approved water/oil separator, and a shut off valve to prevent large spills of flammable material from entering the sewer. Grade breaks In the pavement shall be installed in a manner to prevent storm water from the-portion of the project not covered by the proposed canopy from entering the drain for the fuel pumping area. This plan shall be provided to the satisfaction of the Storm Water and Sanitary Sewer Sections prior to the Issuance of site preparation/building'permits. • • mitmeas-2 • l o%•S' ti/1 •,,r 0 £0 " G? •\ � \ tp4 : ' ; ` op f<' ' , • g i ,•,- ,'43 ( �: ,� .. :mJ : , : , may•,.• = III • • . ••}�''•lr•a'.l'g �`�', :• . • . \. \ :1. • "o. •.ismcr'• • z7 '1I ' = t. i'• .I ,, ', i•' _ _ t.N ___// \ .. . . ,,. tit •re. � � B —� wit • Q •'I: > r. I � .-t f/ Iwil' .II I I i ' may. I.I. III �. ,I • „ I I •,r( .II�QII' I \ y ..; r,,., r,..6...E. PL. II piipipirr.... .$4:.. I10M/L1111P-- 6 IN � a -- - s ° �_ Chevron USA, Inc. •' ECF;CU-096-90 1 APPLICANT Mark Cross/Robert H. Lee & Associates TOTAL AREA 24,295 s.f. PR I NC I PAL ACCESS South Grady Way EXISTING ZON ING ' B-1 , Business District 1 EXISTING USE Gasoline Service Station PROPOSED USE fueling station with convenience store COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN Commerical Uses COMMENTS Located at 301 South Grady Way • i • J ` / IL_A I_Iuuv S.7th ST. 1 I I �t i . , , .. ci-_—_, Lt,F7 . 1 ,, I 0 ay �g� I p Gtady [�`� I S• o a I� I j i `° Ai u�, i ram_ I _ to �� �.°'��° �� 1_R�atl I I * a -% 1 � `J S.Renton Villa PL I 20NI,J • h / i A t,c. 92a nES 1 )F- GK-Aa'K W,W 1 - 1 Zo(J D L-I I r-^ IA Co f-(T I Nc�JSM�rot: • Al-1, Peceeizn ES q NORTH oF (al'(A v`( Y ACE6D S- ) ' .15 NEIGHBORHOOD DETAIL MAP U SIBS plsi7ZtC.T SCALE r-soD._D. DRAWN&OWED CDR DAYLI=MD a. NEIGIDORHOOD DETAIL MAP PLANNING RENEW IRO Memo USA.hG PERMIT "-"gt�.s..n. 30, S.GRADY WAY BID RENTON,WA REm9Cit coNSTRucT,oN 1 I arc•Y- 200.-0• DAL 8/12/9O ••• Q DR J.SH. oLSJ.K APP. R�CQRDQQO. •DRAWING 0 I 4/9814 ` u - i I,)RoeOtT H.la r•AasoaAYv p 1 ,09/8498 g SLANT LEGE I.n I.ol L MN[ 10u0 IlME ,M >ru.o.po,n— 1-1 11,/2--15 !)C' w01M R°BRA IREB a•• livo/ .. 5aP1 5-1 I5 GA_ 15I :l'-,' 'ABEIIA G.TD.ARB GwMER'14G55T MEIIA 26. , sTj/ 5-2 15 GAL 131 ir-5' IBEABCR:S wIN10/71515 ;BMBER. \ '�� 5-5 I5 G!L !,x 1e_-OW.B.-ASEA:'$R[D' IIC01114 e•AB➢C/4"---------/ � ��m a 10.111.01. �', s-, Is GAL In e' WOW.misrR: -;arlo,w. y� 111 ` --� 5-5 Is u:. 16 1T-.• .141u5 Mlwo Auto Auto 1015 / Iv•A.oc 1..� i _ v�� „ ^ `- - - b6i 5-a 15 G._112 1J-1. IR„wDB°ORDBB 1ARC 'RnGG°DE10R°n• 4,0 l j �-4- % ,may. _ u a i . 1 — ----- I '� _!��'�AO �� a-a(,2) \11 orcu7170,11565 GC-1 ;- '1521 Si;- ISOG 4W w p [g1Ru5 AA �+..1D (� AA.o � H 1.) rC-x .EATS. Bx)Y I,]" MN4 AA,GI1 rEgt I�1_.11 p,...�sAa / � ��_ o.•RG xRInRR,i / , IlGJ'� ra..... ru ,, ,' .w.uu. I.Ie-ot' I a-x(.1v SOIL)-{ Ayvl ` I Ally%I R6lxc 11�33TIOO6 �; ( f-x U) ua-, 1.•Po1510,125i:x.- ICLYIA°REA C0MN5 L°755101ER(RED/BE°E) a alv) ss�__ '\ �' ' '� `�Iw� l trs m O ♦'' •I1A-2 I.'.onl ,av :s- .LOBELIA.ERuiUS LOBELIA(R,wn,E) irk / 1 106a0.E.: i —. I �l �~ = m V " '1 '\ I 1.`i Z. ALL BSAN,.G AREAS s1A.L BE.uom 1.N1.55111.In BABA.SI.w1115 Oil tAl �� \ i . 1 �•S"'1 i r u.no m ECU,to A 1.,wv oE.w aG r. • �.GAu I �\ 0°°0 r— I \ ii`„.K,•wawa(.BM �"k o SYMBOLS �1,-� ' ' i 1 1I %— .J� ,.. 1 BUILDING DI ,I ' I euunulc 1 I !6�,.�t C9 — 5 re 1 ' J '1 6302> �A 8y GG�P—k yll 1 1 I �J jrl "I Wig k �cC�� of �� � / F,,\O i B 1. '1 I 45'X 97 cANOPr 1I %; I/ Own..) \ fO �¢ / 1 sl \ r+i n o F1 AL�aa.Sall, N 5-11 w 0 01 � ( f 1 sat I 7 r x-,i. . — :-. j0 0��00000-- - o00o0oo0ooO /� m .as A o,zc _A . , i . .t.jr - ra- A13 %-- „Se 53.14 •�h 11`\-,--Iooc mn.c SECA. �641 1.Sr ao/U mow.V..I1vrr+I) =I ` mil(- T+ Innua oRne se¢T wrt ..(Tnrx, 5 SOUTH GRADY WAY �Q R' OwnsIWO SITE t LANDSCAPE ."'B"v E""'i ei.°A 301 GRAGY war P1319oYS RENTOI;•N'ASMINGT°': 8 # 9TA.a .,. .Ann., '•.lo'-c" oA>r i/9c SITE PLAN & LANDSCAPE PLAN f t.�T �1 ==� S.I.K..A^•. IL+� SS)99,! g —d.100ERT,N. 4,ATA°OAT6 J I,1d — oaf e7oz ---- ------------------------------- —IASO. T j UP11 GRAY l�Jlld�'tk R — --(ASOA BLUE BnERNu>_ RAIWA707111105� me n. sn n. (tmlc a OF x) T no rA 06. ' o-.MiC H1orzM 41 Yo MALrW N17 m I �9/� hrs. �ECN 9wIL iR.+G IfSelf . :• BSO _ ..-. v _. .. 75 SO r) (7YP O. L I ®eAND IUPPER.ALL L RS bKY i �y I I I �— - CANOPY/SALES BUILDING FRONT ELEVATION • D9PD9rz ADC 9uAAR i rAJA.--- lik _„, ar-wR[ GA16tlPGt� 1_PANe. B� EDD. � ; A.3ERN.LLYALLAiA :INS.. I�AS 561T(1YM" ar]) i e � • f i 611E9046227 LJAYAAOED --- AA i 16,5 50.n. Food Alert MARBER BOY110 , .'-�.—_- BLUE • M. �y.p�525 - UUII, 11JUU. _ - _ _a4.24: C 1 I/ I I;' - _ - BK.S sa n.-r24 Hours TRAM BE01P7ASE- 1 - 1 - ' _ r o�asR _. I GRAP93 PANE:. ! CANOPY/BUILDING SIDE ELEVATION .1 f . DPPISIE sot Up1DCAE ,MS IBM--f- -• SIGN-ELEVATION 15.B 97.11. • • - (lYP Of 7)� —"SCA um7 xn )FOOd MOH �.rz STR9t � � LBW"BALL !���^ • rASQA.AlBLUEBC B�D.R,� ND COM A !RAUL - [i UPPER..LL DARK GREY , On_.wrz R I. I E SOBER BAU_ I Ud7 GREY '.--,-- DARK GREY BYO pTm BUILDING AND CANOPY EEYAMHS NW Marron USSR VC. BUILDING SIDE ELEVATION 301 GRADY WAY 000GDE SIDE pCNDrJ.L REYSPS SENTO':.WA. _ L, I , /A'.1'-0' DAI'L 3/5/9: A Do'—P:u 'S OJ.K. AP?. j I SS/9114 / i T I RIt OERT IL EJEL 4 0P• ....iATQ A T.m.......r... ....;:rn....r'...u.. . CC L 1JOBS 6702 E - 1 .W,A✓tL..L.90019 L[,.P. I 'W ITDE• I �Q �o�o I LY Alm 5e1, Self• 1 1 CANOPY FRONT ELEVATION A=a PETAL iAA / wATESO I NE,AI WALL PANELS Li.GREY I NETAL.ASOA—` I 1 OFF WtRIE ll e h `1 PETAL WALL PANELS— I `sQ O yl 1100016.92.000119 I WM f r.,,,iu . , IF I� B FRONT ELEVATION A I_ / REAR ELEVATION/\ ,.A.FOR "".". CANOPY SIDE ELEVATION • • ]4'-0 x • CANOPY \p/ i „. SCALE:,,4-.Y_G- I v • i a 1, RESTR00 No.••2 1A RESTROOIA UT11J1Y4 ACE I'm . No.1 . nA s SIDE ELEVATION A FLOOR PLAN UTILITY BUILDING ' LLnm IMO Chevron USA.Yr.. Y..,.g 0,rosow s 301 ' UTILITY BUILDING ��S RENTOTON,WASHIHINGTON 0 I ; SW:1/4-.. 1—0- DATE 8/13/90 . Q ' DR.J.S.H. OW.R.G APP. A I I SS(9914 3 =00 ERT M."lJS t A350OATFS (NA I ABj B498 G » C O RE O tJ C G MM NCIN wti :::>the. will b ;heard.:It m <will:. ::called:for::hearin tthe> isc a on>o::the::Hearin' PROJECT NAME: FUELING FACILITY& RETAIL BLDG PROJECT NUMBERS: CU;ECF-096-90 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Applicant seeks to convert an existing full service station with auto maintenance bays to a fueling station with a convenience store on a 24,295 sf lot. The existing auto maintenance bays will be eliminated. Construction includes a single-story 1,250 s.f. retail bldg., 186 s.f. utility bldg, four fuel dispensers, and replacing three 12,000 gallon steel storage tanks with three new 12,000 gallon double wall underground fuel storage tanks. The project is located at 301 South Grady Way. DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING APPLICANT: Chevron USA, Inc. FILE NUMBER: ECF; CU-096-90 LOCATION: 301 South Grady Way A. SUMMARY AND PURPOSE OF REQUEST: Applicant seeks to convert an existing full service station with auto maintenance bays to a fueling station with a.convenience store on a 24,295 square foot lot. The existing auto maintenance bays will be eliminated. Construction includes a single-story 1,258 square foot,retail building, 186 square foot utility building, four fuel dispensers, and the replacement of three 12,000 gallon steel storage tanks with three new 12,000 gallon double wall underground fuel storage tanks. B. GENERAL INFORMATION: 1. Owner of Record: Chevron USA, Inc. 2. Applicant: Mark Cross/Robert H. Lee&Associates, Inc. 3. Existing Zoning: B-1, Business District 4. Existing Zoning in the Area: B-1, Business District; L-1, Light Industrial. 5. Comprehensive Land Use Plan: Commercial Uses. 6. Size of Property: 24,295 square feet. 7. Access: South Grady Way 8. Land Use: Gasoline Service Station 9. Neighborhood Characteristics: North: Auto dealerships. East: Office buildings and retail stores. South: Office buildings and retail stores. West: Hotel. C. HISTORICAL/BACKGROUND: Action File Ordinance Date Initial annexation --- 1547 5-24-56 D. PUBLIC SERVICES: 1. Utilities a. Water: An eight inch water main provides service to the subject site. b. Sewer: An eighteen inch sewer line provides service to the subject site. c. Storm Water Drainage: There is a 42 inch corrugated metal storm sewer pipe with catch basins on the north side of the subject site. 2. Fire Protection: Provided by the City of Renton as per ordinance requirements. 3. Transit: N/A PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER Chevron USA PUBLIC HEARING • July 2, 1991 Page 2 • 4. Schools: N/A 5. Recreation: N/A E. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE ZONING CODE: 1. Section 4-31-10, B-1, Business District. • 2. Section 4-31-34, Landscaping. 3. Section 4-31-36, Conditional Use Permit. F. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR OTHER OFFICIAL CITY DOCUMENT: 1. Central Renton Plan, City of Renton Comprehensive Plan Compendium, 1986 (pgs.61-67). 2. Commercial Goal, Objectives and Policies, City of Renton Comprehensive Plan Compendium, 1986 (pgs. 16-18). 3. Section 4-10, Mining, Excavation, and Grading Ordinance, City of Renton Code. 4. Section 4-14, Parking and Loading Ordinance. • G. DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS: 1. Applicant seeks to convert an existing full service station with auto maintenance bays to a fueling station with a convenience store on a 24,295 square foot lot. The existing auto maintenance bays will be eliminated. Construction includes a single-story 1,250 square • foot retail building, 186 square foot utility building, four fuel dispensers, and the replacement of three 12,000 gallon steel storage tanks with three new 12,000 gallon double wall underground fuel storage tanks. Testing that has been completed at this time does not indicate the presence of any soil • contamination. If during the construction phase of this project soil contamination is found the construction work would have to cease until a soils remediation plan was accepted by the City. The project site is not located within the Aquifer Protection Area for the City of Renton. • The project is located within an area that is subject to flooding. The tanks have been located on the portion of the project site that is not subject to flooding. There will also be a • retaining system designed, in accordance with Code requirements, to keep the tanks in place in the case of flooding or high ground water levels. Further improvements planned for a nearby development, Village Place North, and future City sponsored improvements are anticipated to address much of the flooding in this area. At one point during the review of this project, the applicants representative indicated that the applicant may not begin the remodeling of the service station immediately following the approval of the conditional use permit. Due to the sensitive nature of this site (e.g. flooding, traffic) staff feels that if construction does not begin within a reasonable period additional review could be required. Therefore, staff recommends that this permit be conditioned to expire within two years of the date of approval by the hearing examiner if no construction has been initiated by the applicant. 2. The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) evaluated this proposal and issued a Determination of Non-Significance- Mitigated on April 10, 1991,with conditions. A copy of the Determination is attached to this report. 3. Various City Departments have reviewed and commented on the proposal. The majority of ' the staff reviewers recommended that the proposal be approved; some conditions were recommended. Staff comments are attached; the content of these comments have been discussed in the text of this report. PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER Chevron USA • PUBLIC HEARING July 2, 1991 Page 3 4. Section 4-31-36 lists 11 criteria that the Hearing Examiner is asked to consider, along with all other relevant information, in making a decision on a Conditional Use application. These include the following: a. Comprehensive Plan: The proposed use shall be compatible with the general purpose, goals, objectives and standard of the Comprehensive Plan, the Zoning Ordinance and any other plan, program, map or ordinance of the City of Renton. The proposed service station is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan Map which designates the project site for Commercial uses, and with Comprehensive Plan elements for commercial uses. The proposed project is also consistent with Plan Elements for the Central Plan area. Section V.A.5 of the Comprehensive Plan states that sufficient access, circulation, walkways, and off-street parking and loading should be provided for commercial development. The proposed development will have access to Grady Way via the interior roadway provided throughout the Renton Village site. Access to these roadways has been secured through covenants. The ERC required the applicant to provide adequate sidewalks along the south and west boundaries of the project site. These sidewalks will lead into the • sidewalks to be constructed as part of the Renton Village North project. The applicant has also agreed to provide a sidewalk along Grady Way as is required by Code. In accordance with the Municipal Code the applicant will need to provide four standard parking stalls and one handicapped parking stall for a total of five parking stalls. Section V.A.7 of the Comprehensive Plan states that commercial development should be compatible with adjacent land uses. Adjacent land uses include a hotel, commercial development, a movie theater, and automobile sales. The proposed remodeling of the service station would be compatible with the area development. The subject property is zoned for Business District use, which permits the proposed service station providing a conditional.use permit is approved. The proposed project adequately addresses development standards for commercial uses (4-31-10). Section 4-20 of the Renton Municipal Code establishes the standards for signs within the various zoning designations. The Code allows a business to have one free standing sign with the sign face not to exceed 1 1/2 s.f. for each linear foot of street frontage. The applicant has approximately 150 feet of street frontage (150 feet X 1.5 equals 225 s.f. of sign area). The Code also allows for wall signs not exceeding 20% of the building facade. The applicant has requested that one pole sign (154 square feet) and 12 wall signs (totaling 100 square feet) be allowed within this project. The requested signs are within the standards established for the B-1 zone. Before constructing any on-site sign, the applicant will need to obtain building permits for the sign. b. Community Need: There shall be a community need for the proposed use at the proposed location. In the determination of community need, the Hearing Examiner shall consider the following factors, among all other relevant information: (1) The proposed location shall not result in either the detrimental overconcentration of a particular use within the City or within the immediate area of the proposed use. The proposed remodeled service station will replace an existing full- service station on the project site and will be available to service persons working in Renton Village, thereby reducing the trips away from this office/commercial complex. The nearest service stations are approximately one-half mile of the project site. The proposed PRELIM INARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER Chevron USA PUBLIC HEARING July 2, 1991 Page 4 development will not increase the number of service stations within this area and will not result in an over concentration of service stations in this area. (2) That the proposed location is suited for the proposed use. As noted above, the proposed project has access onto Grady Way from the roadways that are part of the Renton Village/Hotel Hilton development. One of the access roads leads to a signalized intersection at Grady Way. During peak hours patrons of the service station will be able to access Grady Way via this intersection. c. Effect on Adjacent Properties: The proposed use at the proposed location shall not result in substantial or undue adverse effects on adjacent property. The following site requirements shall be required: (1) Lot Coverage: Lot coverage in residential districts (R-1 and R-2) shall not exceed fifty percent (50%) and the lot coverage of the zone in which the proposed use is to be located. Lot coverage in all other zones shall conform to the requirements of zone in which the proposed use is to be located. The project site is zoned B-1, lot coverage for buildings in this zone shall not exceed sixty five percent(65%) of the total lot area. The new building includes approximately 1,258 square feet. An additional 3,015 square feet will be covered by the proposed canopy. A total of 4,273 square feet of the project site will be covered by the building and canopy. This is equal to 17.6% of the project site. This is well below the 65% that is allowed under the B-1 zoning. (2) Yards: Yards shall conform to the requirements of the zone in which the proposed use is to be located. Additions to the structure shall not be allowed in any required yard. The B-1 zone requires a minimum front yard set back of 10 feet and a 10 foot landscape strip along public street frontages. The applicant has provided the required landscaping along Grady Way. In accordance with the requirements of the ERC the applicant will also be providing a five foot wide sidewalk and a minimum five foot wide landscaping area along the interior roadways. (3) Height: Building and structure heights shall conform to the requirements of the zone in which the proposed use is to be located. Spires, belltowers, public utility antennas or similar structure may exceed the height requirement upon approval of a variance. Building ' heights should be related to surrounding used in order to allow optimal sunlight and ventilation, and minimal obstruction of views from adjacent structures. The proposed structure is a one-story building which is twelve feet in height. The proposed canopy will be eighteen feet in height. The B-1 zone allows for a maximum height of 95 feet. d. Compatibility: The proposed use shall be compatible with the residential scale and character of the neighborhood. (Ord 3599, 1-11-82) There is no residential development adjacent to this project site. Talbot Hill residents will not be impacted by the development as it is well away from their homes and not readily visible at this distance. e. Parking: Parking under the building structure should be encouraged. Lot coverage may be increased to as much as seventy-five percent (75%) of the lot coverage requirement of the zone, in which the proposed use is located, if all parking is provided underground or within the structure. (Ord.3903, 4-22- 85) PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER Chevron USA PUBLIC HEARING July 2, 1991 Page 5 • The plans submitted by the applicant indicate four ground level parking stalls (three standard parking stalls and a handicapped parking stall). According to the plans submitted by the applicant, the proposed building will have approximately 1,000 square feet of retail area. The Parking Ordinance requires one parking stall for each 200 square feet of retail area. The plans submitted by the applicant indicate a total of four parking spaces (three standard parking stalls and one handicapped parking stall). Staff recommends that the applicant provide a total of five parking stalls(four standard parking stalls and one handicapped parking stall) in accordance with the Parking and Loading Ordinance. f. Traffic: Traffic and circulation patterns of vehicles and pedestrians relating to ' the proposed use and surrounding area shall be reviewed for potential effects on,and to ensure safe movement in the surrounding area. Construction activities, including the excavation of the underground steel storage tanks and the remodeling of the existing service station, could generate traffic which would impact area roadways during peak hour traffic. Based on the fact ' that S. Grady Way is a Major Arterial, the ERC established measures (limiting hauling operations to the hours between 8:30 A.M. and 3:30 P.M.) to mitigate traffic impacts from Hauling activities on area roadways. The traffic study prepared by the Transpo Group, dated January 15, 1991, indicates that the conversion of the existing service station to a fueling station with a convenience store will increase the traffic generated by the development by 220 trips per day for a total of approximately 1,200 trips per day. As the project site is • located within the Grady Way TBZ,the ERC established a fee of$9,900 to mitigate the impact of the traffic increase on area roadway facilities. The existing service station does not have defined ingress/egress driveways on the east or west boundaries. This leads to a confused traffic pattern that will only get worse as traffic increases. The plans submitted by the applicant show a new landscaping planters along these boundaries, in accordance with the requirements of the ERC, that defines the ingress/egress points. This should help to eliminate some of the confused traffic pattern that has occurred in the past. Concern was raised at the February 13th ERC meeting that the access shown on the plans to Grady Way from the east side of the project could be eliminated by future building unless it is protected by an easement. The applicant has submitted copies of the access easements for this site. g. Noise, Glare: Potential noise, light and glare impacts shall be evaluated based on the location of the proposed use on the lot and the location of on- site parking areas, outdoor recreational areas and refuse storage areas. Noise, light and glare are anticipated in conjunction with construction activities. Some mitigation of these impacts will be achieved through restrictions on hauling hours and construction activities. No additional mitigation measures will be required as the site is surrounded mainly by office and light industrial uses (e.g. auto dealerships). - Theexisting servicethenew servicestation. Noise e s g bays will not be included in s a generated by the repairing of vehicles will be eliminated. New lights will be installed as part of this project. The plans indicate that the lights are designed to retain glare on the project site. The perimeter landscaping recommended by staff should ensure that any glare produced on the project site is retained on site. Staff recommends that the applicant use non-reflective (mirrored-finished) glass in the proposed building to ensure that the potential glare does not interfere with on- site vehicle and pedestrian circulation or off-site traffic. • h. Landscaping: Landscaping shall be provided in all areas not occupied by II building or paving. The Hearing Examiner may require additional landscaping to buffer adjacent properties from potentially adverse effects of the proposed use. In accordance with the ERC mitigation measures the applicant has submitted a revised landscape plan. The proposed landscape plan will improve the aesthetic • PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER • Chevron USA PUBLIC HEARING • July 2, 1991 Page.6 appearance of the project site, reduce the potential of any glare produce on-site from impacting area traffic and complement the landscaping used on the adjacent properties. i. AccessoryUses: Accessoryuses to conditional uses such as dayschools, auditoriums used for social and sport activities, health centers, convents, preschool facilities, convalescent homes and others of a similar nature shall be considered to be separate uses and shall be subject to the provisions of the use district in which they are located. Not Applicable. j. Conversion: No existing building or structure shall be converted to a conditional use unless such building or structure complies, or is brought into compliance,with the provisions of this Chapter. Not Applicable. k. Public Improvements: The proposed use and location shall be adequately served by and not impose an undue burden on any public improvements, facilities, utilities, and services. Approval of a conditional use permit may be conditional upon the provision and/or guarantee by the applicant of necessary public improvements,facilities, utilities,and/or services. The plans submitted by the applicant show the relocation of the sidewalk and 11 street light on S. Grady Way in accordance with the City of Renton standards. The applicant will be required, in accordance with Municipal Code standards, to provide one additional hydrant on S. Grady Way. Drainage plans for the proposed project will have to comply with the King County Surface Water Design Manual which was adopted by the City of Renton. The drains for the fuel pump area, under the canopy, will need to be tight lined to the sanitary sewer system with an approved oil/water separator, with a shut off valve to prevent large spills of flammable material from entering the sewer. Grade breaks in the pavement shall be installed in a manner to prevent storm water from the portion of the project not covered by the canopy from entering the drain(s) • intended to serve the fuel pump area. H. DEPARTMENTAL RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommend that the Hearing Examiner support the conditional use application of Chevron USA(CU-96-90) to remodel an existing service station and replace the three existing 12,000 gallon steel underground storage tanks with three double wall underground storage tanks subject to the ' following conditions: 1. The applicant shall comply with the conditions established in the Determination of Non- Significance-Mitigated for the proposed project issued on April 10, 1991. • 2. The applicant shall use non-reflective glass in the proposed building to limit the potential glare from the proposed development on adjacent roads. 3. The applicant shall provide drainage plans for the proposed development in accordance with the King County Surface Water Design Manual to the satisfaction of the Storm Water Utilities Section of the Department of Planning/Building/Public Works. The drains for the fueling stations will need to be tight lined to the sanitary sewer with approved water/oil separator, with a shut-off valve to prevent large spills of flammable material from entering the sewer. Grade breaks in the pavement shall be installed in a manner to prevent storm • water from the portion of the project not covered by the proposed canopy from entering- the drain for the fuel pumping area. 4. This conditional use permit shall expire two years from the date of approval by the Hearing Examiner unless construction has been initiated by the applicant. 5. The applicant shall comply with the applicable City of Renton construction standards and requirements. . . . • • ' . . ,.•__ „ , , • • , . • ' • _ _ • .. -*-- ------- -z - :40- --.'J..; ;$;;;•0-1,3317.'4• • f:;..... , . -. .., ....„-.•Y: •-,•-..4, ,e7...A-..... • - ..--.... :.•••.d... •..i,.:-..--••• .: , •• ....-- ', ,-. ":"'Z;-., I'• - r ,. .• , .: • ... • ;., , '...-c0-,c.p.. •• '0)...\ ' - . • . • '::-....--,:'.'.,...';:•.:1).;'.-,„:. • ..,, '' --17 .... .- it tiC÷-*-21.C'C-.) '...j 7 1.4.1,1•'-%pi, i AI 1441 -a•-1-Tii:**.--4',-;'...'24-t• -,'•-*• ••;-.\-\-, -C.,t-•• •\;•••' ',.:'-' 2:'''- • t\- •:;*'-' :.pt..p2•-•.**•). :-... ,.(-;-*:::'.":".*,...-,"'•'igE .. :„.,..1"-\-N:T.•:•1/ '19,,., ''..t•Y ''. '''. 11. 2.-;.1.-' ,'• ••-•'-'• •":•:'''':"... '.\ •''' •.'• -, :., \ . • s.' • a-5 ••ci.'i '''. .. ' ,,..,....;% • : • .1' 61'1'., ..',..7. .• '0 li•• 1 • - '•.- ""•••' ..'I.' - •• •,'. \ • \• .: iiiii: ..:">...:',..4;;•N ...,.,,,.'..:,."?.... ....••'`'.. .•S. , ,.....:.....,••• ,1•.;•••::•• ,),N.S -'..c.'•,-, .. •:;,..•;,,...,,:-.•;.-•tt ""....:-,. ". . . ‘ . . ...- . t/• e *•••—"O'ilii::i':1;thiP ‘'-:-:"'-'--;:7.1:.`i.,...;"..'•--.''''...".:.1',.„.•-',.."•';'-.•-•-•-:-...::::.-.'-•:.'"::.'',' V...-.\ '.. . ";., '...:•--'-'-'-::•'!'•:•;ri ,,,s7 1:' 7..-•'...1-i':''',/.: .iFing:.0,-,ki .4t‘r4311,4 .efi'erWt;:::14.1; .;:' '.'.,I. : i...`.!'''..::•`-'.. :::' . ...F.: ...'.:. ...'..-':.:'i. ,.. ':::' °';'' 1111"Ct' ' :Z.. •":14. -.1k. * #4.17., 44,r77:%'-'5';'..:?,--....'•.•."‘i::',11-..'--:.2:.., z:''. . .',:,;-'' ''',, '• .• . ..:. •..N.., .;'', ... 'i',..:;,':-. ,.,.. ...,:, 1-": .:t' M i 4.-,--.1-,4-•-" ,1'...'''.-..e:',44 . .4.1aLlikl..4.1 ..';;.--/,''':zi' ''' ''!--'4•"''--:-•••• '''.;' •- •- . . A \• •. •-•.''•1. :i':•;.:"..:;',:lZi '1-.4. ''''.;-.....''''' :'.==Rio.,.. ....., ;2: ,-....,,, 17"17'.%-rifV.P:04''‘,‘'Ori;'Vii..ili;:-.. .-.. ..'--:: ' .....• . , .,•:,.. '•:. • • .. ' ' • - '' \• •\ - • • ' .....,;:.,.....„.,1 ,')+-..- .„..., ,''''.-.:.,:f,,•,•,.'•.E-, ,.. ,,..,,.:. • ',,,:i.,....;0.'71 ''i ,,-. •• V,''.'I..1 R71.":,- •.`:!: ....:=; ;;;•:.'.;:-;:i;:::;,,,. •••• '..:?: '-:c _.';'.•...• - ."t:,;,:'..',",:;/. - ."..-..•.•'''•..:,..:-:.. - • \ . . ... ,. ...'' ''. -:..,:. .'.?.•6 ':4' .,-,. ''";"Le-,1 *-.;_:;_,.,'...,. ;•":,',*•• .'i.4.l2..1:,1) --•:....,. . -:-...-1,••:,-';•••,,•-....f.,, '•-•.-:.-.:•:-: ..:. ...:.--:••••,*"!•-••••• ••'".-.,.* ',:" ..„-......\.:::. *'.-::::::'...**. ...,. •- . :-. :'. :-..••••": •'•"-:ii• :•"',]":.'•1. :;;,*'*. ',),smarm=-;.; . -.:..1) :••:.••• •'.•:.:2*.7.' "Iii U1)"'037:1?..S ...,'• '-'•.---1-.._.-.. • ai .:71-.,:,;•:„..-. ::......,,,,,-;.),;:•,.:.• ., •••••• ,:c.--•,';..-....,--•:-.--:...R..t.:• k----.'!...t!,-,,,i.:.:41:•,.. .. -.:.....;.•;:,,,L 7.. ..,...[• • ..:-..T..7.-,.11,1‘', •• .-if,.....A,:,,.....,••,,..,.,:•,,,,,,,..-,,,..,/.,..,r• •.: * •'-'': •::•••••.,:.: i :2'1-:•••• '.ui ...:..'..:::-.••'• . * .• . -'• .1;:-1-...•. •-:.i..",1:*:*A,(i--*N•j-:.?•c:!,:::.:f.•;:..: •:-.•:.. ..: .2',-`-:'•,,:filii4 : ..)I' •1 '4,-*If:?..5S•Z•'• •••'S••••'. 's *:•.'"-:•6.../f".:•• •• ••.: ',.••..•,l'•• ...* • *:1• •••••::-*,-,:••-•:::::• ',•" .:••:-.....,:**'' . ...:. : :*."-,:,:I :'.'1...••'*-:•• "•••••;.1.!:--'c) '*::.;:\ •-:'•••••••.,:: ' '''. •:';.:••*; ',7' •,::-',.,'' :-.7 • 'r-±, v•-•1::: :-.;'e.'::'''':.•.:.:t:..7 '5:'•. ••••••''' •;•••• - .- • ••• • • • '• . - ' * • -.• .1. . 1 • :•: .- Ct '• .. L1'7 kt.:-•-..."...-..---4 .-•.. •:•.•-:••i• • •"• ••I:t. .1,,:,-,-...(-).?:.1.1:5;...-:,.,..;.•:',-.-,7.,,,'.--:.=,.::,,,...<.(......,:,.,,;,4,: ..-.. . .,...:•14...m. • .,, .4.- 1,., ,.:-.1:lie.4;*z,..-".•,:',-..fi,',"•.:, -,. :,!..: .'',' '", -=:..----.. - • ..,'. '.. 1 1-•.':.,:::*. '•: 1 ' ...:,..•::•••.1.., . ....',,I ,'-'4. V,:...i':;:',P:',4.;.:: ..:: ::I-...,:.....:...?..,..''..:• ' ...'.,•'.•:..f.".1 illi"°m_.....:,. ,!,..r.r , q*,,....i.•,',4'.';'•:,z,,,r;.:f).r.,:!;;Z:;',',Z.-..,.';',•,.....,,'":., '.' .•'' , •''''`',': '. , • '-'••••:%.' . '''' ' '',:: .- ' . ..:.i',..•I''''. ...'?,1:-'7V.r.•.4.....;... '':::;,...;;.....:!;.:‘.' -,. ' • ••.:•.. , ';',.:,',.?:,..;°:II"'°°'°. ''.'•ti;t 1 ''.:r.-'.:.;',:.•:.' ,:''',.7-1?.., :CS......'r.r.; :C,..• .::',•.,...:,„:..', ..... .:.:', .' .''..r-''.: . ••• , • ' ,,'., •:', .• :,•• •*--:--. ••.;l.."'-;.::',,'r/if--7'1-'7'.:..s.:'," • .•.•:•:;:y..: •:: ''•1 . .•'.. ,''Z.;:•••••':' ''...': . , :\,:•_:?,..,, .:;:'_.•,•"•:".',1...•!----. •:''•-;:::',•:::;,'•=f i''.'.t....i•':•:''.';'''.'::•;:':j .: ''.'•.'''......... . . :"' :... . •••;-",.::.5E:::.-`;?::%c:2-. 'Ll_ ',..-',,;.-,141-V„..,:c, :...?-;..::..,:-...-.; f,.....,, 4,..,.,-. • . .. ...;....-. , . . .. . _ A..'••:•-•::.:,:,;..,•;.'•,,r-':'•7:- i*,:*•.: ;',.:*,:.•::::-';.*:1••,, .•::•:,.,.•-:.::::--.* - :.--•.* •-...._,:._,---7--7::::-.: 1.4,.... .-.__:::. , - . .• ••• :.--t:•:.•*•1* -2.-..••:..:::•,.,..;:,:.•:-,:•••:•.;•,::•,...--...:: , -....,::,...::--,-..• .... , . ..,..... . A.,•,...:T".:*:•,••-•'••••*•: y •-•..,'..-, ,i, ••::,,: .•;;;;-; ,,..••;••-,*-.!,.*';•-;;;;•::::::;_..1...17-2----i-•• ., , -*.:,:: '. -... .- • >----.,.., ,•'2,1'1' , ., if..,..,•• .••,..,::.,,,. .:,‘:':*:,•':7••••, .. •;_••• :: .;':-••••::.." :f-::: -...*•...:-.....-:........::::.• *•*.::-;:.*,.',.••".--,•,•' .:.•'.:':•'' "•::••'; ': ..1,-** ••-•* __...,..-- --": • .* • •••, I .1 *. :• 1 .--..• ..' ":,,,;:;•;*•.*;s*:. .....1:,••:-..:: ".:._ . •::`:: -: • . ':'.B ..._:_ -_____,..:•-•,-,, • .........".......-7•;____-:,•-•':•-••• :••' - • ' ., il..• ...... .:..•: .,:,.z... c:.• • .. - -• I. '. .‘.. ..,, ., ... .:..',.-C••• ....::''' i. ...j.--,"';: -.__:'.,,j. . 'I. .• : .•*- :-%..' ..::: .,,,.,... ' . ., .11110 . •• (1 .',. '•- ;,•:• 1 I.• • ' .1' ' ..... ':,:1;,;i1.4'. ::::' ......!....' ,•:,,•:.-. ''.. .. •.',`.-..: ,ifs, ,.., ,, • .„:".. .: . .'---'---'.... '-'......"':.?F'''•":.... . .. 1. :.:1'1..,.. • . . .. 7" , ...• •'-.....:;:::,-:2.. :.•' . 1'•'1 ' . . ' .S:• .::';•,•:L.:;:::::.1:-......".: 1,:•.: '-'..'..1.'.. . -•'.-...,,,...:'..;.&? :••'' ;.i-',11 • • . ' .--i. .'1‘. la. '." •• .5:1:ill ;ill '.. ...'`•"."1111;: ' •.'. ' • . . 1 , :''' .:!..• '.". '.::::::'•i'...-.:-- .. :t.`•'...•...'..;• •„''.."s.• -:.:.,',''..7.,! , .... -• .......:,.....;: •• :4 1: I.: .‘10-:,1 ..' • ... 1 110 " 1 . . 4...., .:„,:• . . .. _ ,. -:...,..s...f-, 1.•F.K,.01., 4i L.A.'S PL.: r. .:.1:,., ....: - . .'11 ,'•'.,....';' - • nil ' 0, • :'.•" • ... .' . '-'1‘.,;:.,:•;- ...r.;;.::-...:'. ' ,•'r. :.•': ., '.".. • ' ' '. •'''' ''-111111110 11 !- --11 -10.r./ \. ..,.. , . op .....-:,:,,,4-,:,, . , ,... ... 5' '' • ''''''r'-'• C."..' ':' .. * :. .* i,,iiiirallal-:7111:1'i 1011111 • --,. ..,... I ' •il I.-‘:.;- •-1.'1 . 1• 3 ' tal •:,•',.11 , ,,,,.... • ,7;:::-.....:: : •1(;•:'..-,..-;.:.,.-...: . . .-. •-• .:...:.....;::.s., - :'....'-'• -, -I- .. •..,•-•,••••.• -'7.:,';' '•_...1 4";:' q.t. ' ., . . . ...,.,..... .... 011111" - illiilr - - ' •'. • — ' - ......... .,..,,,.:•., • ;:::.........i,:. ,.• ,.••• 4.•' '. Be ,•:...,': • - • •• ,.. .,,:„.,-,.. -,L,,i_......itelii ..• •-:,,f.,.: •.:: • .• .f.:;.-....-.•,.:,,, - .. -.• .' .:- .,-...,..,:.,",..43,-E-',.3.. ....- -E.•...!..,--:•,--.'•''..' • • isrvis fa 1 'ffigill ' • ' ..111•111111-4° -4,,.....;....,...,...::,:-.....",:..;..:......:,--- •- 4-,.. i .,,wit.10.• is le. ' 4 •-•' '' .. . . • ..' OW- •.-•• .' ...„....:„. -..- , '.--•-L;;;;'2...;--i.-, ••:••••*--•:::.-.:7--F----- Y:•::•''•':;----E-,..,,• -;.••_;: ,' t.-.-- ,..b.,-.. .. r., ;-,;,..:-..-;-:----_,:.„••,....,•• -,----7,...,-77.7•• ,, . • • '..,---, - • - - • ,..:.:•%;* ',Pia, t. .:47;- ....,..: __..iiL----"' 7. 7- . k '-, • .• 7-'---7---7-.....--.'"..:::‹1-..":...%'.; ' ';',.... . , 1•, ' '• '-' .. • :..*•-Ik‘ .:'1:::'•:`.• - -._:_i:i., Ft,:f .... -.....1--, ...:. .....: r in i .., ; ii. if . .. _ . . . . ., . _.:.. . ... . _ . i . ... .. ---,, . t .:1 .?i.,:-1-i-.:,1 ,.,'_..„--__., -,--,..;—::... , ..-- - , . .:, -_ _L,'. • ,•44'. -...1. i • _ _,. ,i,,_-•-:'.i. ..E..„,,-;.--... Xi z- __•-, ....... ..1 1 ''';,0-.;r"" '- .-. .:".,-,-,-1 -1 ,•-• • • _'-'•% •-•--,<'•- ' ' ..' - ,F‹ '4 14' !it.,i rzo '•... mun (. ., • 1107. . -t4-73...1r77.7-'1„. il ,,... . ,:-.:-,.5" ....- .. • , , , r., . .....__ ....., • • . .. ,i ___ mazil. . • • ... .... f1-1 . , • d -I-, ---:-.I:_•--• „._____—_:,,. • _ f : I • . • 1 • - 1 _ : . . • . • . . , . • , • ' . • • . ' • . . •. ,1 • . , Chevron USA, Inc. - • .1 ' . • ECF;CU-096-90 . • . . ,, . • • . 1, •, , . •. ., • . , , • , • • .. • APPLICANT Mark Cross/Robert H. Lee & Associates TOTAL AREA 24,295 s.f. . . ., ,. . , • . • 1,, PRINCIPAL ACCESS 'South Grady. Way , . I . ' . . . ' EXISTING ZONING .B-1 , BuSiness District . . • , • ,' . .1 . . • . . . . •! ' EXISTING USE Gasoline Service Station .• • • , •PROPOSED USE' fueling station with• convenience store • . . . . , COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN Commerical Uses • , . • . • . . • • COMMENTS Located at 301 South Grady Way • • , . . • , . . • • , . • . • . ,. - . • . • i. , . . , . • . . • . • . , ' , .. , • I • .. . . I . .• . . .:.:.,.. w-I . ,y \\\\..... ...„ ... •f•••• iii • • • • • •• • • •' .. ..Ill.„ -i • • • • • • \I / •�•' la ~ • • • • • • • • • ils rw• •° :;. t - - - 1 •°oyp...,,,, lllll�m • • • .�•1.1 % ."°00' rn - ,0000rtltlr{{gq-3 ••••••••••••••••• • • • a Q •lall- g0g0g0 0 • • • • • •• • • •• • • . . •,� • ' it�iii: i). 1111EMA ElliM t;•000ii°000yR� •��•• ••••••• •••• ••••••rF' �`a •••.!!v ?b. '00000 0�0, Iq. • • • • • • • • • • • • • g•o• ef `'' • E. 0•,•0•�R_-, .. t:: :\s, ::000 0000; i• • • • • • • • •0000;► °o•o°g'gOg ,1■illi r; I�;•°0 °°. • • • I - .I• •••••• •4 ••I ' y:° U'■t\ ,`. g: I■i OogOgO 0000 •••••• I'ii::;.;.::5::'•;:iiiii: ••••• • • I •• krui:•\, 1N °• ' ■■..�;00°0° °000. • • • `y.— —i■.ii • • • 0. ....le \.■■■r1 �_� o'■■� o 0 0 0 0 1QQIQ��� MEIN •, �..■11 , •■tl DOgO OgOOg• •°•°•°• �6 —_ ...it I�,I�'Jf' . if maili \►:' <':■■ O O O O O O O O O• 4444 111■ {::It 00°O 1000°O, �O°00 Ill■•. '/■ ' I O O O O O O O' - \ ••• _-J ::::i■ °00000 0°O°O ,O°O°• i,l■.• , •• III "el _ O O O Ogg'.O• O O, II O O O O O O O O I;� w , , "r° �l,.• — j�,� °o°o°�°go.000o va,•o,�. e••F .IeJ. Q ti n jlY/, O O O O O O O O,: O ■.,•— 'may I - �� Op►.1 00000 0�0°0°0°0 •0°•I .I11 1�l .I r ,:O 4k `, It•000000 00000000., o• ■ I . P • O O \ I ■■ •g000�0°O_OQODOgOgO °00. 1I1I1 Irt■• O O O - tl O,O O• I Il /t■tt•g0g0gogo� Cat. - - - •• ! / •.l� •I■ •oliG■Hr ,' ,. lino■•-�=- �, EL.... \■4.Ilt�t. M r.a. III■■■'' �� r�l ® fQ� 4j\\I.irii - Ili-■. ■II■.•. .jo`e��-c•t�+r��. ■■■1 . OoogOgoo .I■■■■i', �..,�• 1.'''ti:•/ ,pY 3,,,•6,r;•J"ti ,'r,3, f• IttttY.-:ayc.�*- pp •e� ,,,,c o 0 0 00 0 , 'I■tttllt■\vi n•{; :•;jl:f•. ' "�'•°+�'/'� ,. 1 • 'oc 1,Ailigirogo'gog000gocs,°o°°°o°O°°°, ilia mi �L' li`C_'Fcs ` 44111111g10.. A` . 00a ■■. • 0 O 0 OO ■ It■■■11■t..� .. ./••• 1 '•'r,,`t ` f•ta man! 1.-...J.■.•o.our■I•,' o/,- �•t, •• , '.••G, .11'4 ti°.c'c •?•'c , �� 11■■■i■IQ■■HIIH tI f S�`•ti ��.0tj fir iii. "Ur :� MEl!.. i ::::::: ...... • .................. ..................... i;::>)^;".°4Z.;,3, "4 LI JAMIld•• ,dr, ---.. too■nllr'...!. - ,?S�-•:' " 7 4"?,��: --—--- r , Nip ■■Ott041111117 !!Iltt■■► yeI r.7 r/' ri:qt,,6`; •• (I 4 - -- der11 r7 .- - - r, i r t s . C Nc � `: r9 J •\--__ !r J'a2••e.t w .•� M, . -iYFI'�-fYIQ= e !-� 1j: 1,<•>i•iii;; l r 1•��.-, n ,. li'It�' 1t 'I■1 :::;5•':.ri,r■ , Ili. 117/.4 ———————— — —— /, •00000. „ ------_ III — •/H■ttl 0°O ■H■!7Y■ ;;°: . �• cpo .^, .• �i[•.kn G _-_-_-__ 0000000000 - _ .Ilv _ ■■■.�:��'1 � 7,",�'�� ,(•'�'f• `rl,r•I,]• ____,00000000000-•,•:•,, __-__ __-- ■�i■tl , ,C ft`� 64\^__. ,•oQQ000000000•,c.: —_—_—_— ��— � "c.o� ,.'v`C" c„ "y—`.0000000000000, ___ „err* . i I� : .t;, 1 `.,.:.• ,•, 00000000000000%.:• ,;[[ o00000000000000•r _ �} .- :.'t � ::� ::' >-",.<i<•;S Jr`r• •C' •00000000000000 . _ ,.,:::•,:;• :••;:} r, ,f • •0000000000000.. �r,"I '- Ii : v .�• 00000+ •-• • • \:I.C''• ,..._.___ \,•-• •ono.• • • • .- .,•=_—_ ------. Rit ..::;:i:i::ii:iiiMi::-:igi ..,.(3!;!?::''' 1.••• ".- • • • „,;.,.., --.-6---wkinf ip illibibi.. ll L. e • ill■i \,\■it■ _-- --__ ---__ .Io“001V10.6.-- ' 4•.• • III■.I IItII■■t J`' -►'i°7lY/-ts- --- ' 'T- ::;::•:;:;.,,?° o 11 1"-' ■7■■■I C - -i ■ -- .000-- goo al.:;:>i<:•.'' A l •�••� Illlmig I,? — - ---_-'000•-__- ��'. � 000 I . ••• 111■It - 0000__- li 0000 _ _ 000'___ • 'tH■t1`• • • !1111■i1 rt■I■■t■■^ _—__ ===__0000-_-_-- {"rJ:.� ::::•'d.. ' IItI■It 1 __ ____'000'___ F,+.•: I lj lt■■tl ','„ II 11■tt■t■■fS -_ ___ ___-—- v,-Ci U :•:<::.. CUP': 1\ ren - - `r ` .°... 000• 0.i ■11014ii•l1woo1�t, o ,` 0000 f 0000.TJ' =r■III■w■■■ _ 'oo0o•k.'tf'CY•:��. 0000 %■t ■Ill 'IV r' •0000•'. 4 F o■■ ■■I `%, v0000■■ •■l�-,. j 000■■ .1ttl.:,,, :, MOM,u-ll'lC"L 'Y -- , ••000000.- �'$�'�■ "■I IR•w,' V— IIItJIP : ,�L ,,� .•°.°.00000 ) t I \7r I•4; -1 Sc 'c Vr° -- _ -- of - p�M1,rn :.; 'iiuiiuuuiiuuI''•0 ^3 —_—— ———= x —— r H tiv,,, �J -,/ , t f ' •V • 1 to LAND USE ELEMENT - _=_ .<< ,`f, :-:- Single Family Commercial = ...atom 0000•••". •',:.t '� :---' ...■■I■■II ■tllttr ,00000000• 3',-+•`• ; '- •I' �. '\■_41".• imni Law Density ■■II■. °°°°ot,°°°, •:t• p. y \\ Office / Office Park ■'I" °O°°°°°°• - Multi-Family ..I .' •°°°°°°°°° .■I,■. •00000000 I pig 0000000, '/�11r 1 0000000•• v,• 2' ' 000000 ^•,` f,,;: .I 00000• - -••• Medium Density °°°°°°° 000 r : :- °°°°°° Public/Quasi-Public °.0.000 -a°° W '°- 0000°°° .,°°°°:o°°°°o• . .......... Multi-Family 0000000• 00000 00000• 0000000 0000°°°. .0.0..000000 �L�:.; 0000° 0000 ,, ..• 00000000000•• 0 ',, r .0o0o0o0o0 o•00000000 • , ,7 .,,-. . I •IiiiiMMIN High Density ,s?o� - "f-- Multi-Family Light Industrial . t. ;,. y f r• � 1 1 HeavyIndustrial a�,10j, Recreation �.�.�. .•• J:x��` Greenbelt ==__= Manufacturing Park „� uU` `°` / Multiple Option . -•'� - 1111 rr'' CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST NO.: ECF-096-90 APPLICATION NO(S): CU-096-90 PROPONENT: Chevron USA PROJECT NAME: Fueling Facility& Retail Bldg DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Applicant seeks to convert an existing full service station with to a fueling station with a convenience store on a 24,295 sf lot. The existing autio maintenance bays will be eliminated. Construction Includes a single-story 1,250 s.f. retail bldg., 186 s.f. utility bldg, four fuel dispensers, and replacing three 12,000 gallon steel storage tanks with three new 12,00�0 gallon double wall underground fuel storage tanks. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 301 South Grady Way LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton • Department of.Planning/Building/Public Works Development Planning Section The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental Impact statement (EIS) is not required under RC1;11 43.21C.030(2)(c). Conditions were Imposed as mitigation measures by the Environmental Review Committee under their authority of Section 4-6-6 Renton Municipal Code (see attached sheet). These conditions are necessary to mitigate environmental impacts identified during the environmental review process. • This Determination of Non-Significance - Mitigated (DNS-M) is issued under WAC 197-11-340(2). Because mitigation measures have been imposed, the lead agency will not act on this proposal for fifteen (15) days from April 15, 1991. Any interested party may submit written comments which must be submitted by 5:00 p.m.,April 39, 1991, in order to be considered. A fourteen (14) day appeal period will commence following the finalization of the DNS-M. • Responsible Official: Environmental Review Committee c/o Don Erickson, Secretary Development Planning Section Department of Planning/Building/Public Works 200 Mill Avenue South Renton,WA 98055 PUBLICATION DATE: April 15, 1991 DATE OF DECISION: April 10, 1991 SIGNATURES: Y l Ill • L nn A. uttdann,Administrator DATEIII Departure t o Planning/Building/Public Works ••‘L() q Jo tin E.Webley,Administrator DATE Cd munity Service Department /0 l/ • Lee,(h eier, ire Chief DATE Rehto Fire Department mitslg DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED MITIGATION MEASURES PROJECT: Fueling Facility&Retail Bldg PROPONENT: Chevron USA ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST: ECF-096-90 APPLICATION NUMBER: CU-096-90 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Applicant seeks to convert an existing full service station with to a fueling station with a convenience store on a 24,295 sf lot. The existing auto maintenance bays will be eliminated. Construction includes a single-story 1,250 s.f. retail bldg., 186 s.f. utility bldg, four fuel dispensers, and replacing three 12,000 gallon steel storage tanks with three new 12,000 gallon double wall underground fuel storage tanks. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 301 South Grady Way CONDITIONS: The Environmental Review Committee issued a Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated with the following conditions: 1. The applicant shall, in order to mitigate aesthetic impacts of the project, submit an amended landscaping plan. This plan shall provide the following items: a) a five foot wide landscape area and a five foot wide sidewalk along the south and west boundary of the project, b) an enhanced landscaping plan along S. Grady Way and c) a twenty foot long extension of the landscaping strip on the easterly side of the project site to bring the landscaping northerly, approximately even with the front portion of the proposed structure. This plan shall be submitted to the satisfaction of the Development Planning Section prior to the public hearing by the Hearing Examiner. 2. The applicant shall provide an agreement ensuring that: a) complete soils testing will be conducted in accordance with the State Department of Ecology standards; b) if during construction of these facilities contaminated soils are found, all construction will cease Immediately; c) within one week of discovering the contaminated soils, the applicant shall submit copies of a soils remediation plan to the satisfaction of the Fire Prevention Bureau and the Department of Planning/Building/Public Works prior to the resumption of any work on the site; d) State Department of Ecology approval will be required for remediation activities; and e) that all 1 commercial and Industrial activities within 300 feet of the project site are notified of the soils remediation plan and provided with a schedule of events. The agreement shall be submitted to the satisfaction of the Department of Planning/Building/Public Works prior to the issuance of any site preparation/building permits for this project. Note: 2.1 The contaminated soils may either be disposed of in an approved waste site outside of the City of Renton or treated on site. 11 3. The applicant shall, in order to address impacts to earth and storm water management, provide a "hold harmless" agreement which acknowledges that the City has informed the applicant that the subject property is located in an area which may be included in an existing/altered 100 year flood plain, and that the applicants have decided to proceed, at their own volition, thereby waiving their ' rights to hold the municipality liable for any flooding and/or for any damages to property or person arising from such flooding. This document is to be approved by the City Attorney, and to be duly recorded prior to the issuance of site preparation/building permits. 111 mitmeas- 1 ` v 4. The applicant shall, in order to mitigate the Impacts of increased traffic on area roads, provide the PP 9 P following mitigation fee of$9,900.00 (220 trips X$45 per trip) for the Grady Way TBZ prior to the Issuance of site preparation/building permits. Note: The fee is based on the following: Trip Generation PM peak hour existing service station trips 108 PM peak hour convenience store trips 130 PM peak hour trip generation difference +22 (To convert from peak hour trips the ITE K-factor of.10 was used.) Daily Trip Generation Difference +220 220 Daily Trips X$45 per driveway trip = $9,900 The fee shall be deposited to account number 105/572/318.70.00.67 Grady Way TBZ/Chevron Facility 5. The applicant, in order to mitigate construction-related impacts (e.g., noise, dust, traffic) shall submit a construction management plan including the following; a) an erosion control element; b) an element for the periodic watering of any disturbed soil on the site to reduce dust; c) an element for the limiting of hauling operations to the hours between 8:30 A.M. and 3:30 P.M.; d) an element for the protection of the existing storm drains from soils on site disturbed by construction activities; and e) a$2,000.00 cash deposit for street cleaning. This plan shall be submitted to the satisfaction of the Development Services Department of Planning/Building/Public Works prior to the issuance of site preparation/building permits and implemented throughout the construction phase of this project. NOTES: A. The applicant will need to apply for permits from the Fire Prevention Bureau for the I removal of the existing underground storage tanks and the installation of the new tanks. B. The applicant will need to submit a sign plan for any new signs for the proposed development prior to the issuance of building permits. C. The applicant will need for provide storm drainage in accordance with the King County Surface Water Design Manual to the satisfaction of the Utility Services Division of the Department of Planning/Building/Public Works. D. The applicant will need to provide a six foot wide sidewalk along S. Grady Way and replace the existing street light in accordance with the City of Renton Municipal Code. E. The applicant shall provide drainage plans for the proposed development in accordance with the King County Surface Water Design Manual to the satisfaction of the Storm Water Section of the Department of Planning/Building/Public Works. The drains for the fueling I stations will need to be tight lined to the sanitary sewer with approved water/oil separator, and a shut off valve to prevent large spills of flammable material from entering the sewer. Grade breaks in the pavement shall be installed in a manner to prevent storm water from the portion of the project not covered by the proposed canopy from entering the drain for the fuel pumping area. This plan shall be provided to the satisfaction of the Storm Water and Sanitary Sewer Sections prior to the issuance of site preparation/building permits. I I mitmeas-2 li BUILDING DIVISIO PLANNING DIVISION • CURRENT PLANNING LONG RANGE PLANNING • PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: • ION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. COMMENTS VI COMMENONS REGARDING TS TS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION T PLEASE PROVIDEBY 5:00 P.M. ON SEPTEMBER 10, 1990. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: -7-/Z:,4zLYSp'e)i7/42.7.---l®Jx -5-Ys7�/ys APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS K NOT APPROVED • Please see attachment. • 7/9/�l, DATE. SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED PRESENTATIVE REV.5/90 SITE, PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS CHEVRON FUELING FACILITY &RETAIL BLDG 301 S. GRADY WAY • SEPTEMBER 18,1990 1) Six (6) foot side walk required length of property abutting to Grady way. Standard sidewalk detail plan required. 2) West property line needs access roadway and property line definition with defined entrance to site. Example landscaping or "c" curbing. 3) Show easterly exit. Proposed pavement arrow exiting at intersection to Grady appears to be pointing the wrong direction. 4) Location is located in a TBZ (Transportation Benefit zone). Transportation Benefit zone fee to be imposed on increase in projected trips generated above the existing facilities. A certified count by a traffic engineer of existing trips required to determine fee amount. Count is for 24 hour week day. 5) Provide information on how this project will fit into the proposed expension of the Renton Plaza Center. CEM301 • • FIRE PREVENTION BUREAI• '` ra POLICE DEPARTMENT `; I COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT i; 1 • BUILDING DIVISION. (I ' PLANNING DIVISION ' . CURRENT PLANNING `. . LONG RANGE PLANNING ` ' ' PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT :` OTHERS: i ; rr ` COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. 1 1, PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5:00 P.M. ON SEPTEMBER 10, 11 ',i)( ' 1,1 ,1990. . ; ! i . 1. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: • W N ,, : ,APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS X NOT APPROVED • 'i;t fe• zNrr4L2.I1 TIO 'v ate 540e Tewe/e 7a . ' Ne w - 8LQCø , Lac4710IV wI � (.- 1 H'4 "E. To 'M EE1 - C (-i f 46".7 < 1qe �.., o - At?Arr-ow C v , ? 4S • ii I i. .., EMO / • d/Ie DATE: l 7 !I SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AU ORIZED REPRESENTATIVE i;' II REV.5/90 r I __ REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: CO-VY''esA L J APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED , W...„1,A.,•4.-i3 C„ •---,,-,,,\_,..t.t.,Ae;;,, . k,-X-X:C7.1-.K. 1,:... A_.Q ,Y,.....xs-1.k.,),-----....,,. 0_,._%-cU_o '',, , c.. U • �' %4 AU c- J V } • • • jr, cr/I / /ck) , .k.�t:�-.�'a4� ,l 4 �C'� .4-t.,1,,,_,...a,... ., DATE: SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE .. REV. 5/90 . DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF-096-90 APPLICATION NO(S).: CU-096-90 PROPONENT: Mark Cross PROJECT TITLE: Chevron Fueling Facility&Retail Bldg BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: To redevelop an existing service station on a 24,295 sf lot. Construction Includes a 11,000 sf bldg,four fuel dispensers,and three new 12,000 gallon fuel tanks. LOCATION: 301 South Grady Way TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED TAC DATE: 9/21/90 ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION _ FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMU DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION CURRENT PLANNING LONG RANGE PLANNING PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5:00 P.M. ON SEPTEMBER 10, 1990. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: Zeig6.7 c) _ APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED icia/.4(../ { DATE: r J SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV.5/90 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: -WC- 1 rrL('VAA1cV\ APPROVED 'APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED '1 i nshallcomply with current Fire and Building Codes and (I Any development and/or construction I rdi- nances. A second means of approved access is required. Fire Department access roads/lanes shall be paved minimum width 20'; minimum height 13' 6". Yes o cf z a coo • is Preliminary fire flow calculations show a fire flow of re uired. z- hydrants with a minimum flow of i I/ nv� gpm"'each is grequired. /S d feet of the structure. Prima hydrant is required to be within 3�U feet of the Secondary hydrants are required to be within structure. An approved automatic sprinkler system is required to protect the total structure. Yes ',Oo`� All fire department access roads are to be paved and installed prior to, construction. Ye All fire hydrants are required to be installed and approved prior to construction. Yes_.__ No ..,6,,,, ,Z. 1-',-/1-``" - • /7/17/ DATE: . , 9, /91 G SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE �xr hcr 0 04/ REQUIRED FIRE FLOW CALCULATIONS 1. HAZARD IDENTIFICATION INFORMATION NAME C 6 d2au_y Sc'2u e � U.B.C. CLASS OF BUILD / �T.��7r/vN ADDRESS ,�o/ -S. . l7 249-0 , 60/ FIRE MGMT AREA 2. DETERMINE TYPE OF-CONSTRUCTION - CLASS (CIRCLE ONE): I - II IV III� V FIRE-RESISTIVE NON-COMBUSTIBLE ORDINARY WOOD(NOTE: IF "MIXED", SEE SPECIAL INSTRUCTION FOR AREA AND BASIC FIREFLOW)D 'I 3. DETERMINE AREA: GROUND FLOOR AREA: FT2 (A) NUMBER OF STORIES: TOTAL BUILDING AREA: A A /S,•- 4. DETERMINE BASIC FIRE FLOW FROM TABLE #1, USING AREA (A): I z so GPM (8) 5. DETERMINE OCCUPANCY FACTOR ADJUSTMENT: ADJUSTMENT: . CD GPM (C) IF LOW HAZARD, SUBTRACT UP TO 25% OF (B):. IF HIGH HAZARD, ADD UP TO 25% OF (B) • 6. COMPUTE SUB-TOTAL (B+C): . • (IF B+C IS LESS THAN 500 GPM, INSERT 500 GPM) I Z 5 v GPM (D) 7. DETERMINE SPRINKLER ADJUSTMENT: . ADJUSTMENT: ® ' GPM- (E) (IF COMPLETELY SPR.INKLERED, SUBTRACT UP TO 50% OF (D): IF LIGHT HAZARD OCCUPANCY AND FIRE RESISTIVE OR NON-COMBUSTIBLE CONSTRUCTION, SUBTRACT UP TO 75% OF (D). ,i 8. DETERMINE EXPOSURE ADJUSTMENT! USING THE TABLE AT LEFT AS A GUIDE, ENTER THE SEPARATION AND ADJUSTMENT FOR EACH OF THE "FOUR FACES" OF THE BUILDING IN THE TABLE AT THE RIGHT: SEPARATION MAC. ADJUSTMENT .EXPOSURE • SEPARATION ACT. 'IADJ. 0 - 10 25% MAX. NORTH ) So'-r- 11 - 30 20 o MAX. • EAST A/55 . ADD/5Ti% 31 - 60 15% MAX. •• SOUTH . . '' ADD /6ii % 61 -100 10o MAX. WEST c/S' ADD /57 o 101 -150 5% MAX. TOTAL % OF ADJUSTMENT 11 150 OR 4-HR WALL 0% MAX. (NOT TO EXCEED 75%) ySiii (TOTAL % ADJUSTMENT TIMES (D) ADJUSTMENT: `{- S,4, 2._.6— GRIM ( • F) 9. DETERMINE ROOF AND SIDING COVERING ADJUSTMENT: (IF SHINGLE COVERING, ADD 500 GPM) ADJUSTMENT: 7) . GPM (G) 10. COMPUTE ESTIMATED FIRE FLOW ,REQUIRED: . (IF D+E+F+G IS LESS THAN 500 GPM, INSERT 500 GPM)(IF D+E+F+G IS GREATER THAN 12,000 GPM, INSERT 12,030 GPM) / ? / Z. S_ (D+E+F+G) REQUIRED FIRE FLOW: ,O UG GPM (H) 11. SIGNED: / � '0'-L„4-z._ 274 /9�9d [.%aTE ? 'I PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED TAC DATE: 9/21/90 ENGINEERING SION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION CURRENT PLANNING LONG RANGE PLANNING PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS S IONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5:00 P.M. ON SEPTEMBER 10, 1990. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: 1 d I ice, V APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED p.,(,L aa/A, GIY by e�. . f DATE: V"!Ibq b SIGNATURE OF DIRECTO OR AU RIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 5/90 16. Utilities COMMENTS: ,�.,5,-y,,„y,- _e /31 We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we.have expertise and have idenfiified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. ig ure of Director or Authorized Representative Date Rev. 6/88 I II FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION CURRENT PLANNING LONG RANGE PLANNING PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5:00 P.M. ON SEPTEMBER 10, 1990. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: l4rv.0 (-Run_ APPROVED X APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED —7(7? — •g4 — c)2 • L - DATE: SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR R AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 5/90 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT DIVISION: APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS x NOT APPROVED f� /1/4 76 car �yr" ,� T� 711( aC,�vt� � � /l�gv� TS 1c Tff, / 9 7 a 4 /N( cave ,7k Sv*liAce w>9 oErh ifk. m ov v 4 L L . 7//a 4#a 'z lvT re, v�N 15t 17o1m Die A''vi4 6f .4iv4 Lys/5 ilk& cou. c vL,4 re o v 77,1 s f T , DATE.: r_? SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV.5/90 • 44 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF-096-90 APPLICATION NO(S).: CU-096-90 PROPONENT: Mark Cross PROJECT TITLE: Chevron Fueling Facility&Retail Bldg BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: To redevelop an existing service station on a 24,295 sf lot. Construction includes a 11,000 sf bldg,four fuel dispensers, and three new 12,000 gallon fuel tanks. LOCATION: 301 South Grady Way TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED TAC DATE: 9/21/90 ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION CURRENT PLANNING II i LONG RANGE PLANNING PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5:00 P.M. ON SEPTEMBER 10, 1990. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: Pw• ! PLA N If OW (/V X APPROVED X APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED ti.E 0., i Ii(E HVO .vr" w ILL /4E60 rd /f 214 fr444 ED ow 71/4 7 Q(rm cue o f G/ro d w y AVE OE PT: ggQ v/A6Li 1 .d • 4ee.ts-rii6t.vr DATE: 9- 7 -7 0 SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 5/90 it . r;r I FEE APPLICATION: cL,/ fDEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET I' t ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET C1L 1 PLAN REVIEW ROUTING SLIP OTHER • DAT • 9-19a• • APPLICANT: _ _1-•41,. at ._._,..__. /' ?lT7Ci1'� • '/ . • JOB ADDRESS: `30/ 1pridlim, 1,1 j - - .• II NATURE OF WORK: / " 1 0..,,y 4'4 J Xlti tg tJ !'Il PROPERTY MANAGEMENT q_ lD -40 . DATE RE EIVED Comments Due BY P OPERTY MGMT. -7— l> /l ' Comments or suggestions regarding this application should be provided in writing. Please provide comments to the Comm. Dev. Dept. (C.D.D.) by 5:00 p.m. on above date. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION , •EES APPLIED CANNOT APPLY FEES : NEED ORE INFORMATION ❑ SQUAREDFOOTAGEIONCd G,L. %til�-✓ l-e•-?"-013' ,Z,Z4F0e/- eg 0 FRONT FOOTAGE I, 4p mil/3904e 4e ❑VICINITY MAP It is the intent of this development fee analysis to put the developer/owner on notice, that the fees quoted below will apply to the subject site upon development of the property. All quoted fees are due and payable at the time the construction permit is issued to install the on-site and off-site improvements (i .e. underground utilities, street improvements, etc.) ;I PROJECT COST LATECOMER LATECOMER AGREEMENT - WATER NO PER. FTG, FEE ,I CITY HELD _0_ ,I,I PRIVATE -DEVELOPER HELD --0 — ,I; LATECOMERS AGREEMENT - SEWER I'' CITY HELD PRIVATE DEVELOPER HELD _n __ ,I SPECIAL UTILITY CONNECTION CHARGE - WATER UNITS SUCC FEE Single family residential dwelling unit $300/lot x Apartment, Condo, each multiplex unit $175/ea. unit x Comrercial/Industrial $• �q• ft. of property x _2 aqc r30, f / /�HI1e SPECIAL UTILI CO ECTION CHARGE - SEWER Single family r s dential dwelling unit $300/lot x �' / Apartment, condo each mul ioleX unit $175/ea. unit x 0 dad` A , xie u-t� i1lktt Commercial/Inds ial s ft. of property x a o _ SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DI�TRICT�Ho pital Area) WATER ,/ hITS �J�'� DEVELOPMENTS WITH ITS SRD FELL 150 GPM FI FLOWS OR LESS: it Area Charge $0.0 `; per sq.ft. x 1, Frontage Charge $ • 1 per front ft. .x �I DEVELOPMENTS WITH GREATE'*. HAN 1500 GPM FIRE FLOWS: Area Charge $0.04: o r so.ft. x Frontage Charge 1B, r+ per front ft. x —rl — il SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DI TRICT (Honey Crk. Intercptr) - SEWER UNITS SAD FEE Hl. AREA CHARGES: ,1 Residential dwel 'rig u its, apartments or euuivalents;. ..25 per dwelling unit x Commercial develop` : t: $.05 per sq.ft. of 'ross site area x FRONT FOOTAGE CHARGES: ,,� $37.19 per Fran.-" Ft. on ea. side) x i,, $74.38 per fr t. (prpt •.on both sides of imprv.) x _. 0 -' AseiZA. /1 TOTAL: $ 3/ OCo/./ , / The above quoted fees do NOTce4.441,4( include spection fees,si s sewer permits, r/w perms fees or the cost of water meters. �� �� � Zi / Signature of Director or Authorized r.es:ntative DATE < e 02.— • • 'LANT LEGE L. swear tart (rapt IBOTANC.NM. 10:211.01NAME 117723 ` T-1 1 1/2•-'5 1f]0' OUERCUS RUBRA RED OAK xm_[SpygK PARKING—� � �w _` 11,:: 5-S(.) a-3(_,w sQR) / s+�CAL I h' �� 5 eRy 2 s$� s-1 is GAL I]z I]'-t' IABEUA G.FDWARD GWCHER'Ia055T ABELIA �G .� 5-2 5 GAL 131 IT-]' (BERBERIS YENTORENSIS :BARBERRY Ir 5-3 5 GAL 112 6' (NANDI..D.ROYER'S RED' HEAVENLY BAMBOO 5-4(5) `Tr ( of mG1�1a od4a����� - j/ 5-4 SLAL 17 IV IPHOIINtA ERASER: IPHOeNIA • � � �-:� �_ftiG�.ICY♦ .� �� S-5 5 GAL 6 ]'-t' 'P1NU5 YVGO NULO 1.00 PINE -__--- �I �I� �, ,' �. ` MI GT.DAMNS 5-6 5 GAL 12 Y-t' RHO000ENDR°N WA.' RHODODENDRON �,,,a11o�0000p , \ (/74 _�^� ®. 0 5-]02) GC-f�- 1521 SF 1- fl gli a \I GROLIAOCOVISS A�A��'D55 -2 'iLArS. p2J s: In' !DWARF PERIMNKLE 1 , © .C'��� µLOVERS IOI B•D 0.: \6 OWERS \ �a1 r / ��2 ��10� WV,� 5-2 IS) -111s 121125E 124' ICENTAUREA CYANUS !CORNFLOWER(RED/BLUE) I• r��� ! ae'o.c---- � ....-\ I ..f ! __�___ __ _ /ft roes wiinY SFrtAu�a � 2 It•POl5Ii1165E'S' 1L09ELIA ERINUS--.-10BEW(PURPLE) . �j' Il0if1` • I I •CZAI, ,IV OF .115 GALLONAGE PRA,.II� !, 1 €1; p `��/ I / 2. ALL PUHnNG ARE1Ls sHAu 92 MULOb'n mrH WEBTDw nR BARn.]/. sYID EQUAL TD A YWMUM DEPTH a 2•./b7 °°0 'N \4; `QWK5 B mom' III Q SYMBOLS SWUM TANKS _ /1 1 —��\ /I l s p o ..----, 1I (�,R m G, M..a m PYa ,'' 7 0 'N Atr-3--1,/ 41,,-i Q ' eusiDSNc ;/i w r� A ))1rfJ ' , 1,1--- 65-,- w i 11 � s2I)- I 1,,C� 1 til I 4s'X e2'CANOPY �l . I''I ! •rft:Z '=V,f caw sus Nem!QR.RI /--:ALK�Y(,`m,P1GLi i 5em 1 •I . • ,Q :I if lj� uw►_0, S-,Dn Lam_ 1� .7 . 4Jit ;\ 0.s...'riti it/ e Il , • s-,N)�-' Aoi �,\ -,(•m 50,1) 11 1 \ /11 r AKR-1(•A2 SQ.1Ta 1;;Gu 01 \BOAaAAA-2(=t,SOTO • 5-,nm /•�Y (- \9_:ti- Rm. a I.D.AND s-a(]) ____ �PwCE SIGN. ) J ra-1(=,oemE.) _ �� 1 O _(iRu SQ rt)/�O . �000000 00 �. 1) ����_"• HN G H _ tee !-010.0.0.0 O:O:O O�%j / "'I'YL D Oo 111�' y _ •/• .I LAIN 00t1O1 II MI—��� so———^'m—— NORTH LI DTI'20'0]•E 1.00' 7 C.D.uro,B.s�I •j l=of wn.) '5• Rdm Demo 506... _ac_(=Ste rt.) aLmwtE can.w s,acr twr ---‘N=t art sowsnap(rroGt) NEW sm..(rm.) SOUTH GRADY WAY lamP° or.11. SIZE&LANDSCAPE PLAN 41011 Chevron USA it. kw 'Y..c..1....s.tte 301 GRADY WAY REN4W5 RENTON,WASHINGTON SITE PLAN & LANDSCAPE PLAN m,µ�P�RAH `""° �»,�„ AA f'1 0' OAE it/2/90_ A RE.. 1s 2/20ro1 L. n J.S.N. CH.S.J.K. APP. 2 max r Ismnl la 55/SS14 o 1�n I.:,n ,,:N..LEL r,AssociAiEs h, I 1 I J08/8702 ..„....----FASCIA dT GREY II III)(\{)/q©n _ METE STRIPE FASCIA.BLUE INTERNALLY ILLUMINATED LETTERS WMTE. IJ.O SO.R. (T,PICAL OF 2) I._ . END FASCI0. OPT-YMIIE /{� F� INTERNALLY UIUYINAIED Self 24 ////Tp3'. DIRECRdAL SIGN elf LETTERING, U YMNE W/DMK GREY LETTERING. RED. RSO.R. .75 SO.R. 1 A — (TYP OF a) ( A RED BAND- UPPER WALL A / .- WWOOW FRAMES DARK GREY 1 - . CANOPY/SALES BUILDING FRONT ELEVATION OPP0SITE 9DE SAILAR I FASCIA.—`• -. . OFT-MUTE r I�®nP�aI SPANNER BOK LOGO. U INTERNALLY 5030. ELIMINATED LOFA p or y)4 (�/I .3 INTERNALLY ILLIMINyPicAL OF 2) I.D.Sd `—U' E' 6LJ S0.R. iANNALLY ILLUMI001 D L' ' Food Mart 'SPANNER BOX h 11.350.R. WINE d . INFORMATION PANEL. / 4 1 I ^ rr BLUE 0 -# 3 / 'MP 9.821 OUUUI / /e/ —UU s� So.R. d9.24; — I + / I I I - _ �4T Hours d MAd RECEPTACLE] I/ - FUEL DISPENSER GRAPHICS PANEL • CANOPY/BUILDING SIDE ELEVATION OPPISITE SIDE IDENTICAL N. -}- "'- LETTERING,ANNE - SIGN ELEVATION 15.8 SOFT. _ - (TYP OF 2) TASCI0. /��> M� >a/ LLCMT GREY OOd liSrU WHITE Amos • PER WA • --A._ FASCIA.BLUE WINDOW FRAME DOOR AND FRAME / \ / MN METAL UPPER WALL - DARK GREY /0 .0 0 OFF-WHITE • ei 13 —C A .12 — 1—Imo— WE RALL. LIGHT WE GREY • DARK GREY BAND Om. BUILDING AND CANOPY ELEVATIONS kg Chevron $jMUNE BUILDING SIDE ELEVATION 301 GRADY WAY �1,9DN5 RENTON,WA. OPM4DE 9DE IDENTICAL Q 4-417-1/4•=1'-0• DATE 3/5/91 _ DR LP.L. OLS.J.K. APP. I i h I ne.t.9 T';LF£i A950gAT i Q SSA 9114 3 • `-� �++ Q I JOBS 8702 i AGMLNMLY ULNA=LETTERS Mrz A>aAoar w �pY01 • WRE own V /FS° INTODIALLT ILLIAIMATED Self .a 1R Self DIREO W DARK EY LETIEAPIG 1 L CANOPY FRONT ELEVATION RE.ELEYATEM 94W • W16bULLY WAMA1Eo LOGO . .m 6T-WAIF METAL FASCIA OFT WHITE . METAL WALL PANELS \ LT.GREY �—METALFFFASCIA I:I OFF W1UlE ,mg +—METAL WALL PANELS—.. LT.GREY �(� F-lUC` Mc.v WA . li—I: IIA „„ VIRE KRIM PA.IIL — IIMITEI REAR ELEVATION n FRONT ELEVATION 0 I N kV• Emil Tuw AE(IPTACLE NEL DISPENSER MAPIRCS PANEL CANOPY SIDE ELEVATION : .� - I CANOPY _ = SCALE:1/4-e1•-0- I • . RESTROOM RESTROOM UTIU /SIYTORAGE leNo.•2 No.1ROOM 2 n A s SIDE ELEVATION FLOOR PLAN ChumUTL17Y BUILDING UTILITY BUILDINGkw Chevron USA.Inc. McMuBO WAY 301 GRADY WAY SCALE 1/A• .-G- RENTON,WASHINGTON • REI MS A SCALE 1/4'=1.-0' DAZE 8/13/90 z E,,ROO A - DR J.S.H. OLM.R.C. APP. T M.LEE a ASSOQAT6 Q JOB/8498 I J l / I l—JI 11_I uu V S.7th ST, —7 V 0952 I I I x VJ a`1(% J I CS S.G‘adH � 171-7 711 a P--ei a r'--'--I a) -e• i L-71_6 J I 1 I4 2�N 1� � � � � � � �J S.Renton Villa a PL n/ 1 /7 C ALL >FRc�'�ES �------,- Cl /` -Tp -ram Nc2TN ` G I ^A= G KADK WAY 1 Z01I7 L'I , i IA(0I-(c" 1 Nws-nzi e ��t • A!.(, P "�rzn ES 1 NORTH r.� 10 -ram SCU'r14- 00 of 6711AG7'( WA? • eus13s D�ST�tcT g NEIGHBORHOOD DETAIL MAP SCALE: 1'=200'-0' o11AWND9 OWED FDIC DATE AAPPROw OWNarmsNEIGHBORHOOD DETAIL YAP • PLANNING REVIEW 40 Chevron USA.to. PERMITIWO l Rg W S 301 S.GRADY WAY BID REN9ONS RENTON,WA i CONSTRUCTION A I SCALE 1.=200'-0' DATE:8/12/90 DR-J.S.H. CH-S.J.K. APP. i D.DRA II. ...... .,...ATED 6 SS/9914 4 ¢S RD8OlT M.LFS r ASSOCIATED ':�'. A JOB/8498 • ::• > :` .- :•::.-:,.• -.-..--- : .::..::: :: •:: :::•::•>:• :•<•::::•:>:;•: :. :::::::::�.-,- . :`: ;: : i:•;•: :CI: Y: . : :: :. ....... ....:.::::::::::-.... .-:. ::•: :•::.......-..; :i : ;:CF NT:::.1P :ll • INS..DIVY T:-SION : ••: � . :::- ..�•>:.: :�:•<•: .: • •: : . . ::::AFF' ICI B MAIL2N:: :: :<::::: : ::::<%. =:: :::.. . : ::: ' On the 2 day of I�un, . , 19 I • I - • deposited in the mails bf t Un 'ted Sta es a sealed .envelope containing 11.E. Ke ()AA rsclk documents . This information was .sent to: Name Representing • Gnevvirr1 Carcr.5, rf GIA - r vr) r (S ignature of Sender) e ��yj,�J�,r/� C�-� • • . , Subscribed ani11 orn to me this E� day of , 19 671 else,- `��oi, 4.t" ..4;;;70.4% & 01. .,'6(...ae4..,/ 1 ib iO q•• . o . : 'u N0T-ARY ; Nota -Public n and for the Stat f Wash ngton residing -pi%c& Stat ;• : a t `o F •• 9, 1gelle e$ therein; I ' P‘ • Project Name :P., .r:-o::;ect:::N.itmber....:: : :. - . ::.: :: DIVISION CITY OF RENT" `PLANNING Y i � JUN r 1 1991 MAY 2 3 1991 CITY CLERK'S OFFRC3r AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION LaAnne Hutton ,being first duly sworn on oath states 51 0 6 7 that he/she is the Chief Clerk of the VALLEY DAILY NEWS NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION • Kent Edition • Renton Edition • Auburn Edition ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITEE RENTON, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee Daily newspapers published six (6) times a week. That said newspapers (ERC) has issued a Determination of Non- are legal newspapers and are now and have been for more than six Significance-Mitigated for the following pro- monthsprior to the date ofpublication referred to, printed andpublished pro- ject(s) under the authorityf of the Renton Municipal Code. The following Applicant(s) in the English language continually as daily newspapers in Kent, King have completed a mitigation process: County, Washington. The Valley Daily News has been approved as a legal FUELING FACILITY& RETAIL BLDG. 6-90 newspaper order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for AU licant seek by Pe g Applicant seeks to convert an exist ng King County. full service station with auto mair te- nance bays to a fueling station with a convenience store on a 24,295 sf lot. The notice in the exact form attached, was published in the Kent Edition The existing auto maintenance bays xx , Renton Edition :x , Auburn Edition xx , (and not in will be eliminated. Construction supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers includeslg., 1 a single-story bldg., sf.0 retailue PP g Y bldg., 186 s.f. utility bldg., four fuel during the below stated period. The annexed notice a pith t i e n nt i n A , dispensers, and replacing three 12,000 gallon double wall under- 5 7 4 5 It ground storage tanks. The projec- is I- located at 301 South Grady Way. , Further information regarding this Iction is available in the Development Se-vices was published on May 13, 1 a q i Division, Third Floor, Municipal Bu lding, Renton, Washington, 235-2550. This )eter- mination is FINAL. To appeal this DE clara- The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the tion, you must file your appeal document with the hearing examiner within fourteen R9_9d sum of$ (14) days of the date the Declarat on of Non-Significance is final or the Deck ration *14. of Significance has been published n the official city newspaper. See City CodeSec- tion 4-6-23, RCW 43.21C.075 and WAC 197-11-680 for further details. TherE shall be only one appeal of a Declaration o'Non- Significance, and if an appeal has already 2 0 May9 1 been filed, your appeal may be joined with Subscribed and sworn before me this day of 19 the prior appeal for hearing or may he dis- missed if the other appeal has already been heard. This appeal period which will ,rnd at 5:00 p.m. on May 28, 1991. Any apf eal of this decision may be made to the City's Hearing Examiner, Municipal Buildin j, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, Wash ngton 98055.An appeal must state clearly, n writ- linq, why the Determination shot.Id be ry Public for the State of Washington revised and must be accompanied by a residing at Auburn, non-refundable $75.00 filing fee. Published in the Valley Daily News on King County, Washington May 13, 1991. Acct. No. 51067. 574t VDN#87 Revised 4/89 OF RFC oTicE o O U 0 © 2 ,, �09 rll m� E P A4rED SEP1Et0 • City of Renton Land Use. Hearing Examiner will hold a .:t p HEARING 1 1 , CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS. CITY HALL ON JULY2, 1991 BEGINNING AT 9:00 A.M. P.M. 1 CONCERNING: FUELING FACILITY&RETAIL BLDG CU;ECF-096-90.. , APPLICANT SEEKS TO CONVERT AN EXISTING FULL SERVICE • STATION WITH AUTO MAINTENANCE BAYS TO A FUELING STATION WITH A CONVENIENCE STORE ON A 24,295 SF LOT. THE EXISTING AUTO MAINTENANCE BAYS WILL BE ELIMINATED. A SINGLE-STORY 1 CONSTRUCTION INCLUDES ,250 S.F. RETAIL BLDG., 186 S.F. UTILITY BLDG, FOUR FUEL DISPENSERS, AND . REPLACING THREE 12,000 GALLON STEEL STORAGE TANKS WITH THREE NEW 12,000 GALLON DOUBLE WALL UNDERGROUND ; • FUEL STORAGE TANKS. J /( 1 L_IL.—JL_, LJLJ LJ • • 1 1---7 S.71h ST. r Ngr YJ eY 44k\ . o Grady 0-1 I�`.`-1 a 6.---Q r ) F. S511--4 L'—_ I 1 1 1 jI ......... .Penton Yllle pL ,; ,__., ,-----, . SS GENERAL LO • � _ ' : 301 SOUTH GRADY WAY FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CALL THE CITY OF RENTON PLANNING DIVISION 235-2550 i THIS NOTICE NOT TO BE REMOVED WITHOUT • hexpslr PROPER AUTHORIZATION CERTIFICATION V I , f`/lartj Sa,vdia , HEREBY CERTIFY THAT - COPIES OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENT WERE POSTED BY ME IN 2 CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON OR NEARBY THE DESCRIBED PROPERTY ON 6, -ac-91 • • , •. i TEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a O :'�N• ary Public, in and for the State of Washington • i. I? icr• NOTARY �ii C : _� : relidi'_ in , on the _Z'�/ SIGNED : y,/,./4 ,cA° .., 7. CP ; PUBLIC : dam of I( J�_ "A es�,o��.vG�9, 199� �O�,eo / � , ••.Zee•' (%j 0°`'4'o�F WASw��,s`s %• g x: CIT OF RENTON wiLL Planning/Building/Public Works Department Earl Clymer, Mayor Lynn Guttman,Administrator June 16, 1991 Mark Cross Robert H. Lee&Assoc, Inc. 1520-140th Ave NE, Ste 200 Bellevue,WA 98005 , SUBJECT: Fueling Facility&Retail Bldg CU;ECF-096-90 Dear Mr. Cross: The date of Tuesday, July 2, 1991, at 9:00 a.m., has been set for a conditional use permit public hearing to review the above-referenced matter. The hearing, before Mr. Fred Kaufman, Renton Hearing Examiner, will be held in the Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall, Renton,Washington. The applicant or representative(s) of the applicant is required to be present at the public hearing. A copy of the staff report will be mailed to you one week before the hearing. If you prefer to make other arrangements to receive the staff report, please contact Kathleen Childers, 277-5582, or Sandi Seeger, 277- 5581. If you have any questions, please call 235-2550. erely, Donald K. Erickson,AICP Zoning Administrator cc: Chevron USA, Inc. 1301 -5th Ave, Rm 2900 Seattle,WA 98101 • hexltr/DKE/kac 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 O� R�� NOTICEU �90 Pam$ INIA C3171110E 09AT_. SEPZe�O� it III City of Renton Land Use. Hearing Examiner will hold a PUBLIC HEARING 1 in II CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS , CITY HALL ON JULY 2, 1991 BEGINNING AT 9:00 A.M. P.M. CONCERNING: FUELING FACILITY & RETAIL BLDG CU;ECF-096-90 ., APPLICANT SEEKS TO CONVERT AN EXISTING FULL SERVICE • STATION WITH AUTO MAINTENANCE BAYS TO A FUELING STATION WITH A CONVENIENCE STORE ON A 24,295 SF LOT. THE • EXISTING AUTO MAINTENANCE BAYS WILL BE ELIMINATED CONSTRUCTION INCLUDES A SINGLE-STORY 1 ,250 S.F. RETAIL BLDG., 186 S.F. UTILITY BLDG, FOUR FUEL DISPENSERS, AND . REPLACING THREE 12,000 GALLON STEEL STORAGE TANKS WITH THREE NEW 12,000 GALLON DOUBLE WALL UNDERGROUND FUEL STORAGE TANKS. J l / 1 L_s L_J LJ L_l l_J L i 1 - S.7th ST. i • '''I <1t. l ' I I w PVf' RO G� V 0 � K i alr,...-3 er,-.Lesci,rox,...) D s.Grady —'_`i TA. ___-- ---_-.—.---,'---- 4'iri: : 515"--1 i I t - U 1 gm i1 ° ,.°0°I l c= ,it r------, I S.Renton Vlhe a PL ��' KII GENERAL LO TI BB: I -rrrr--- ------1 r---1 ri i'l ii 301 SOUTH GRADY WAY 1I I 1 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CALL THE CITY OF RENTON i, II PLANNING DIVISION 235-2550 THIS NOTICE NOT TO BE REMOVED WITHIOUT hexpstr PROPER AUTHORIZATION NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON HEARING EXAMINER RENTON, WASHINGTON A Public Hearing will be held by the Renton Hearing Examiner at his regular meeting in the Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall, Renton, Washington, on July 2,.1991 at 9:00 a.m. to consider the following petitions: FUELING FACILITY&RETAIL BLDG CU;ECF-096-90 Applicant seeks to convert an existing full service station with auto maintenance bays to a fueling station with a convenience store on a 24,295 sf lot. The existing auto maintenance bays will be eliminated. Construction includes a single-story 1,250 s.f. retail bldg., 186 s.f. utility bldg, four fuel dispensers, and replacing three 12,000 gallon steel storage tanks with three new 12,000 gallon double wall underground fuel storage tanks. The project is located at 301 South Grady Way. ij Legal descriptions'of:the files noted above are on file in the Development Services Division, Third Floor, Municipal Building, Renton. All interested persons to said petitions are invited to be present at the Public Hearing on July 2, 1991 at 9:00 a.m.to express their opinions. Publication Date: June 20, 1991 li it Account No.51067 • • hexpub V „_. __, . ROE- RT H. LEE & ASSC -4IATES, INC. I ARCHITECTURE PLANNING ENGINEERING 1520 140th AVENUE.N.E. • SUITE 200 • BELLEVUE,WABHINOTON 9B006 [20B]748-4B77 FAX(BOB]74B-BB3B BTEVEN J.KATTNEp ' Architect Ma' 24, 1991 Mr. Mark Pywell, AICP i' Senior Planner City of Renton Renton, WA. 98055 iI 1' RE Revised Site Plan for Chevron Mini-Mart and Fueling Facitlity, CU-96-90. 'I ji Dear Mr. Pywell: 1 I Attached is a revised site plan for the Chevron Mini-Mart and Fueling Facility. Pal the conditions of the Mitigated Determination of Non-Significance, we have added I sidewalks along the west and south sides of the site. We added pedestrian stripping across the entrances to enhance pedestrian safety. A tree was added along the east side of the site next to the dumpster enclosure. Sod was removed along the front of the site and replaced with additional shrubs at the east and west ends of the landscaped areas along Grady Way. The sidewalk along Grady Way was moved back from the curb 4 feet to meet the City Code requirement. 1 Also attached to this package is a new PMT of the site plan and a site plan colored to show the proposed building location,yellow, landscaped areas, green,property lines and j northi arrow red and street names are in black. 1 I will call you next week to make sure everthing is in order. If you do need anything else to set a hearing date please phone or FAX. • Sincerely, 1, RO ERT H LEE AND ASSOCIATES, INC. . PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF VIENTet" iil • Mark Cross, MAY 2 4 1991 Senior PlanneriiE cEW ED CC: Jay Hummel, Chevron U.S.A., Inc. ; 8702Wearing.Itr Recycled Paper I . i i v c. CI7 " OF RENT ON .rIL Planning/Building/Public Works Departmen± Earl Clymer;, Mayor Lynn Guttman,Administrator May 10, 19191 I I Mark Cross Robert H. Lee&Assoc, Inc. 1520-140th Ave NE, Ste 200 Bellevue,WI 98005 SUBJECT Chevron USA CU;ECF-096-90 Dear Mr. Cross: This letter)is to inform you that the comment period has ended for the Determination of Non-Significance- Mitigated for the above-referenced project. Comments were received. The issues raised by the respondents have been noted and will be considered by Staff i their reports. The Committee's determination is final and may be appealed to the City's Hearing Examirier later than 5:00 p.m. on May 28, 1991. To appeal this Declaration, you must file your appeal • document with the hearing examiner within fourteen (14) days of the date the Declaration of N'oni Significance is final or the Declaration of Significance has been published in the official city newspaper) See City Code Section 4-6-23, RCW 43.21.C.075 and WAC 197-11-680 for further details. There shall be only one appeal of a Declaration of Non-Significance or Declaration of Significance, and if an appeal has already been filed, your appeal may be joined with the prior appeal for hearing or may be dismissed if the other appeal has already been heard. Any appeal must state clearly why the determination should be revised and must be accompanied by a non-refundable$75.00 filing fee. If you have questions or desire clarification of the above, please call Mark Pywell at 235-2550. F e Environmental eview ommi e, al Y Donald K Erickson, ICP Secretary cc: Chevron USA, Inc. 1301 -5th Ave, Rm 2900 Seattle,WA 98101 • ti strtapel/DKE/ 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated for the following project(s) under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code. The following Applicant(s) have completed a mitigation process: FUELING FACILITY& RETAIL BLDG CU;ECF-096-90 Applicant seeks to convert an existing full service station with auto maintenance bays to a fueling station with a convenience store on a 24,295 sf lot. The existing auto maintenance bays will be eliminated. Construction includes a single-story 1,250 s.f. retail bldg., 186 s.f. utility bldg, four fuel dispensers, and replacing three 12,000 gallon steel storage tanks with three new 12,000 gallon double wall underground fuel storage tanks. The project is located at 301 South Grady Way. Further information regarding this action is available in the Development Services Division, Third Floor, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington, 235-2550. This Determination is FINAL To appeal this Declaration, you must file your appeal document with the hearing examiner within fourteen (14) days of the date the Declaration of Non-significance is final or the Declaration of Significance has been published in the official city newspaper. See City Code Section 4-6-23, RCW 43.21C.075 and WAC 197-11-680 for further details. There shall be only one appeal of a Declaration of Non-Significance or Declaration of Significance, and if an appeal has already been filed, your appeal may be joined with the prior appeal for hearing or may be dismissed if the other appeal has already been heard. This appeal period which will end at 5:00 p.m. on May 28, 1991. Any appeal of this decision may be made to the City's Hearing Examiner, Municipal Building,200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, Washington 98055. An appeal must state clearly, in writing, why 11 the Determination should be revised and must be accompanied by a non-refundable$75.00 filing fee. Publication Date: May 13, 1991 Account No. 51067 pubnot ii- ____,, . • . ,._ , N OT I C E . ,, , , • VIRONMENT DECLARATION • 1 .APPLICATION NO. CU;ECF-096-90 PROPOSED ACTION FUELING FACILITY& RETAIL BLDG I CHEVRON USA, INC. APPLICANT SEEKS TO CONVERT AN EXISTING FULL SERVICE STATION WITH AUTO MAINTENANCE BAYS TO A FUELING STATION WITH A CONVENIENCE STORE ON A 24,295 SF LOT. THE EXISTING AUTO I • MAINTENANCE BAYS WILL BE ELIMINATED. CONSTRUCTION INCLUDES A SINGLE-STORY 1,250 S.F. RETAIL BLDG., 186 S.F. UTILITY BLDG, FOUR FUEL DISPENSERS, AND REPLACING THREE 12,000 GALLON STEEL STORAGE TANKS WITH THREE NEW 12,000 GALLON DOUBLE WALL UNDERGROUND FUEL STORAGE TANKS. i 1 GENERAL LOCATION AND OR ADDRESS 301 SOUTH GRADY WAY POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE [E.R.C.) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE I, PROPOSED ACTION ❑DOES NIPOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT ❑WILL WNILL NOT BE REQUIRED. THE CITY OF RENTON WILL NOT ACT ON THIS PROPOSAL FOR 15 DAYS FROM THE DATE BELOW. COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY AN APPEAL OF THE ABOVE DETERMINATION MAY BE FILED WITH THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER BY 5:00 P.M., Ivey ol: 1QQ1 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON PLANNING DIVISION AT 235-2550. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION III CERTIFICATION • HEREBY CERTIFY THAT 3 OF • I , Mn.r� sn.vP.1a , COPIES I THE ABOVE DOCUMENT WERE POSTED BY ME IN 3 CONSPICUOUS ' „ ��tabYVVt19r,O�O OR NEARBY. THE DESCRIBED PROPERTY ON S-' pi-- 9/ 0 SOP TvA��� 0 ;.,:iiilop • vN yST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a • �T. ' in and for the State of Washington . N . ,�� • No,., Public © a: PU , 11 p' ;�G BLIC e re�di i� �l.��i�i✓ on the �� SIGNED : `1?'la� �a>� "a99��C•••��e 9 i99a�;0 �r of f v 1 1 Op •:...••°AS � II •up WASH@�tOt* ,aga./�J� t • . 4 V ' NOTICE ENVIRONMENTAL DECLARATION APPLICATION NO. CU:ECF-096-90 PROPOSED ACTION . FUELING FACILITY & RETAIL BLDG CHEVRON USA, INC. APPLICANT SEEKS TO CONVERT AN EXISTING FULL SERVICE STATION WITH AUTO MAINTENANCE BAYS TO A FUELING STATION WITH A CONVENIENCE STORE ON A 24,295 SF LOT. THE EXISTING AUTO MAINTENANCE BAYS WILL BE ELIMINATED. CONSTRUCTION INCLUDES A SINGLE-STORY 1 ,250 S.F. RETAIL BLDG., 186 S.F. UTILITY BLDG, FOUR FUEL DISPENSERS, AND REPLACING THREE 12,000 GALLON STEEL STORAGE TANKS WITH THREE NEW 12,000 GALLON DOUBLE WALL UNDERGROUND FUEL STORAGE TANKS. GENERAL LOCATION AND OR ADDRESS 301 SOUTH GRADY WAY POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE C E.R.C. ) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION ❑DOES lOPOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. . AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT WI[.� LL tgtV /I LL NOT BE REQUIRED. THE CITY OF RENTON WILL NOT ACT ON THIS PROPOSAL FOR 15 DAYS FROM THE DATE BELOW. COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY AN APPEAL OF THE ABOVE DETERMINATION MAY BE FILED WITH THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER BY 5:00 Rm.; MOY �R. 1 QQ1 • FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON PLANNING DIVISION AT 2 3 5-2 5 5 0. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION envpslr %F`N:s CIT OF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works Department Earl Clymer, Mayor Lynn Guttman,Administrator May 8, 1991 Mark Cross Senior Planner Robert H. Lee&Associates 1520 140th Ave. NE, Suite 200 Bellevue,WA 98005 SUBJECT: Chevron Fueling Facility ECF;CU-096-90 Dear Mr. Cross: The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) met on Wednesday, May 8, 1991 to consider your letter, ,. dated April 23, 1991. Your letter expressed concern with the landscaping, sidewalks and street lighting as required by mitigation measure number one and note"D". Sidewalks were required as part of the landscaping requirement in mitigation measure number one. The location of the sidewalk along S. Grady Way is established by Ordinance 4-24-3 and 9-12-8 of the Renton Municipal Code. The ERC did not feel that they could waive a Code requirement. It was noted that the sidewalks along the Honda site were located adjacent to the street. However, the Honda dealership was already established when the street improvements were installed in accordance with a set of plans that were approved in the past. Procedures have changed since those plans were approved and they would not be approved at this time. In your case the ERC felt that the sidewalk along S. Grady Way should be instaled in accordance with the current ordinances and standards of the City of Renton. Your letter also questioned the need for the sidewalks along the west and south property lines of the proposed project. The ERC noted that similar sidewalks had been required on the Village Place North project, the Vysis Corp. project, the KLUA Building and within the Paccar site. These sidewalks were required along private roads or driveways to separate pedestrian and vehicular traffic. Section 4-6 of the Renton Municipal Code (Environmental Ordinance) adopts by reference the policies of a number of City codes, ordinances, resolutions and plans. One of the Plans included by reference by this ordinance is the City of Renton Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive plan in the Transportation Goals and in the Central Renton Plan addresses the need of separate pedestrian and vehicle traffic systems. The Cinema Complex at this time does not have a pedestrian pathway to S. Grady Way. However, it does provide a separate pedestrian sidewalk that will match up with the sidewalk system required on the Renton Place North project. Once the project site adjacent to yours is developed the sidewalk system proposed for this area would be complete. As noted above, sidewalks along City streets, such as Benson Highway, are ordinance requirements and are not usually called out separately in the environmental mitigation measures or conditions of approval. The ERC feels that it is essential that the plans presented to the Hearing Examiner reflect what is being proposed on the project site. In this case, the amended landscape plans required prior to the public hearing are needed to demonstrate how the applicant plans to comply with additional landscaping requirements contained in the mitigation measures applied to the the project through the DNS-Mitigated. 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washingto n 98055 The Village Place North development was required to replace the mercury vapor lights with sodium vapor lights along S. Grady Way. Staff is recommending, but not requiring, that Chevron replace the mercury vapor light with the sodium light in order to maintain a uniform appearance along the south side of the street. It should be noted that the sodium vapor light puts out more light than the older mercury vapor lights which will improve the safety of the area. The Village Place North will be required to make all Code required improvements to S. Grady Way which means that they will match what is being proposed for the Chevron site. At this time we will initiate the appeal period for the Environmental Determination of this project. If I can be of any further assistance, please contact me at 235-2550. Sincerely, teNtigi‘ Mark R. P ,AICP Project Manager ,�:mETRO _a Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle Exchange Building • 821 Second Ave. • Seattle,WA 98104-1598 April 24, 1991 PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF IBINTON APR 2 6' 1991 Environmental Review Committee s• ECoVE c/o Donald Erickson, Secretary Development Planning Section Department of Planning/Building/Public Works 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 Determination of Non-significance File No. : ECF-096-90 Chevron USA Fueling Facility and Retail Building Dear Environmental Review Committee Metro staff has reviewed this proposal and anticipates no significant impacts to water quality or to Metro's wastewater facilities or public transportation services. Metro supports the SEPA mitigation measures which have been stipulated for this project to protect water quality. Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment. Sincerely, Gregory M. Bush, Manager Environmental Compliance Division GMB:p1g203 IIIROB.-.IT H. LEE & ASSOC'.,4TES, INC. ARCHITECTURE PLANNING ENGINEERING 9620 140th AVE.N.E. • BUITE 200 • BELLEVUE,WA 98005 • [206]746-4677 JOHN W.JOHNSON Architect PLANNING DIVISION April 23, 1991 CITY OF RENTON APR 3 0 991 Environmental Review Committee City of Renton RECEWED 200 Mill Ave. South Renton, WA 98055 RE: Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated on Chevron Fueling Facility and Retail Building, ECF-096-90 Dear Environmental Committee Members: The following comments on the Determination of Non- Significance-Mitigated are submitted to you on behalf of our client Chevron USA, Inc. We have three areas of concern I will outline, along with a listing of the areas in which we are in agreement. In brief we agree fully with the terms of Conditions 2 , 3, 4, 5, as well as Notes A, B, C, and E. Our comments and concerns relate to the landscaping, sidewalk and streetlight conditions contained in Condition Number 1, and Note D. On condition number one, we do not see the provision of sidewalks as appropriate to mitigate aesthetic impacts. If sidewalks are to be provided they should be required based on an adopted transportation or sidewalk plan and/or to complete an established system. Our contention is that both public and private actions in the Renton Village Area support the idea of a sidewalk system being continued along Grady Way not along private driveway areas. We support and propose to install a six foot wide sidewalk at back of curb along Grady Way. The provision of sidewalks along the west and south sides of the property are not consistent with other actions taken by adjacent property owners or the City. The recently approved Cinema remodel does not have a sidewalk connection to the collector street. The BP Oil project on Benson Highway did not propose or have a requirement placed upon it to complete its sidewalk along Benson Highway. Grady Way has signalized pedestrian crossings and street lights. The private driveway system behind this site does not have signalized crossings or sidewalks, none are planned and none have been required by the City. This leads us .to the conclusion that the sidewalk system along Grady Way is more appropriate. April 23, 1991 Page 2 Chevron does not want the liability for a sidewalk system along the west and south sides of the site where pedestrian circulation should not be encouraged. We ask the committee to let the Hearing Examiner decide on the necessity of such an improvement. Making it a mandatory requirement under SEPA precludes a compromise solution before the Hearing Examiner. Finally, we request the sidewalk requirements under SEPA be separated from aesthetic mitigation measures. As for the aesthetic mitigation measures listed in Condition one and Note D, we have the following comments and concerns. We agree to extend the planter on the east boundary twenty feet as per condition one and to add landscaping consistent with the same landscape treatment of the other perimeter landscaped areas. We agree to provide 12 copies of a revised site plan for staff review prior to Hearing Examiner Staff Report preparation so that the Hearing Examiner can have the full opinion of staff on the positive or negative aspects of our plan. We understand, from talking with Mr. Pywell, that providing an "enhanced" landscape plan means adding some color to the current planting plan. What we object to is to the SEPA requirement that a plan be provided to the satisfaction of staff prior to Hearing Examiner Review. After the first review by the Environmental Review Committee, we met with staff and were given a plant inventory done for the Cinema remodel to the south. We agreed at that time to change plant types to incorporate more plantings from that list. We agreed to add an island in the middle of the existing driveway along the western property line, and we agreed to deepen the landscape along Grady Way to triple the minimum depth along the north east corner (thirty-two feet instead of ten) we agreed to remove sod and add substantial shrubs along the entire length of the Grady Way frontage. To accomplish this, we added thirty-four five gallon Glossy Abelia in a continuous line, eliminating sod and connecting massed plantings in the middle and at the far ends of our Grady Way frontage. In comparison with the recently approved retail activity across the street, Renton Mitsubishi, and more recently approved Renton Honda, we feel our landscape effort is deeper and more intensive. Keep in mind that current City Code, in the B-1 zone, allows buildings to forty feet behind a ten foot planting strip. Our structure is less than half of that (18 feet) and sets back twenty five feet. ROBERT H. LEE&ASSOCIATES April 23, 1991 Page 3 We also understand that the recent proposal for an adjacent ten story office building had a more extensive landscape plan that may have raised expectations, but that proposal was for a Conditional Use Permit where public benefit must be shown and included office structures to 135 feet. Finally, the City currently has a limited policy base for guiding the review of landscape plans. Our current proposal is an enhanced version of the original landscape plan that we feel mitigates the aesthetic impact. Based on this, we would like to go to the Hearing Examiner with our current landscape plan. We understand that staff can advise the Hearing Examiner as to the relative merits of our proposal and potentially recommend more intensive plantings. We agree to the terms of Condition 2 . We fully intend to meet all City,. State and Federal law related to the removal and the installation of underground fuel tanks. The Fire Department has been very helpful in explaining their requirements. State and Federal requirements will also be observed. We agree to the terms of Condition 3 . We understand that a Hold Harmless Agreement must be reviewed and approved by the City Attorney and recorded prior to the issuance of permits. We agree to the terms of Condition 4. We understand the policy base for this requirement, the methodology used in setting the mitigation level, and that the fee will be paid prior to the issuance of permits. We agree to the terms of condition 5. We understand that a construction plan and cash deposit must be submitted and approved by the Development Services Department of Planning/Building/Public Works prior to issuance of permits. We agree to the terms of Note A related to applying for permits from the Fire Department removal and installation of underground tanks. In regards to Note B, our comment is that we have submitted a sign plan for your review. Scale sign elevations including size, colors and heights of all proposed signage are included on page two of our current submittal. We further understand that separate building permits are required for the signs. If the Environmental Committee has a different understanding than this or want additional information, then we do need a clarification of this note. ROBERT H.LEE S ASSOCIATES April 23, 1991 Page 4 In regards to Note C. We do agree to fullymeet the terms of g Note C whether the reference is to the old or new King County Storm Drainage Code. In regards to note D. We did show on our plan a six foot wide sidewalk alongGradyWay. Our proposal would be to install a Y P P six foot wide sidewalk as shown. I understand from Mr. Morgan in a discussion we had between ERC Reviews that the phrase "install sidewalk along Grady Way in accordance with the City of Renton Municipal Code" implies moving the proposed sidewalk location four feet from the back of curb. My understanding is that this is based on City Code. All other properties on Grady Way that have sidewalks, have them at back of curb. We request you not require that we be the first on the street to meet this requirement. We ask this for three reasons. The first is that moving the sidewalk back from the curb lowers the proposed berm in the landscaping. The second is that it would require the relocation of the street light. To the best of my knowledge, the City did not include a requirement for this setback on the recent office building proposal. The site plans presented to the Hearing Examiner show the sidewalk along the street. The Renton Honda and all other developments along Grady Way have all been approved by the City with the sidewalk along the street. 0 A third comment would be that the proposed Mitigation requirements would leave the Chevron site with a unique sidewalk alignment and a unique street light fixture alignment on Grady Way. Besides the difficulty of providing consistent lighting along the boulevard, _we feel that a uniform approach is safer for the motoring and pedestrian traffic. It is our understanding from reading the text of the Hearing Examiner's decision on the proposed office building to the east that there is not a definitive plan for the improvement of Grady Way although a TBZ has been enacted and funds are being collected. Like the sidewalk location, the removal and replacement of the existing light standard with a new model would be unique to Grady Way. In addition, moving the sidewalk will necessitate its relocation. Thus, being out of line with all the other light standards. We request the Environmental Review Committee consider the idea of changing the light fixtures at the time that other improvements are done along Grady Way. Our client would be disappointed if the street were changed and another streetlight modification were done in subsequent years. ROBERT H.LEE S ASSOCIATES April 23, 1991 Page 5 Note E requires separate treatment of the storm drainage from the driveslab. Our site plan all ready shows a separate trench drain for the drive slab routed through mail water separator. We agree to all of the requirements of note E and will work with staff on the detailed implementation. However, we note the absence of this requirement from the December 14, 1990 Environmental Determination done for BP Oil at the Benson Highway site. Other recent reviews in this part of Renton have shown it to be a complex area with interrelated issues. Thank you for consideration of our comments on what has to be a complex review for the City Staff. Sincerely, ROBERT H LEE & ASSOC. , INC. *444 Mark R Cross, Senior Planner CC: Gary Williamson, Prop. Dev. Spec. , Chevron USA Inc. Jay Hummel, Engineer, Chevron USA Inc. 8702\SEPACOMM.LTR • ROBERT H.LEE&ASSOCIATES • Washington State Duane Berentson -,/ Department of Transportation Secretary of Transportation District 1 15325 S.E.30th Place Bellevue,Washington 98007-6568 (206)562-4000 DATE: April 18, 1991 TO: Mr. Donald K. Erickson, AICP pLRNNINGDI'�ISI®N Environmental Review CITE�}��ENTON City of Renton Planning/Building/Public Works Department PpR 2 2 �99� 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Wa. 98055 C ` xt SR 167 MP 26.48 Vic. CS 1716 Determination of Nonsignificance for Renton Chevron City of Renton File #: ECF-096-90 FROM: JAMES L. LUTZ, P.E. , Utilities/Developer Services Engr. Washington State Department of Transportation District 1 15325 SE 30th Place, MS 113 Bellevue, WA 98007-6597 Thank you for giving us the opportunity to review this document. Our response is checked. below: • XX We have reviewed this determination of nonsignificance and have determined that this project will not ' significantly impact a State highway. We have no further comments on this proposal. We have reviewed this proposal before. Our comments on this proposal are as we stated in our previous letter from dated, . We have no further comments on this proposal. The State recommends that a traffic study be prepared to analyze the state intersections that are impacted by 10 or more of the project's generated peak hour trips and also determine what mitigation measures, if any, would be required. Intersections that should be analyzed include, but are not limited to, the following: 1) 2) Please contact Vern Swing (562-4269) or Don Hurter (562-4274) of my Developer Services Section if you have any questions. •T.Y O.T. N:< NT >: :.:.:.::::s::::: :: ::: :::: ::::::: : :::::::::>::........ . .. . . ...P.LANNINC.::. . ',FIDA,. . ...O.F.'•::.S.ERVI.CF.>:;BY:;:;MAY;LING:::::>:..„.:::.:::: :•::•::�.....::::: :: On the day of AA , 1, 1991 , I deposited in the mails the United, S ates a sealed envelope containing c� e nmoadvyl E Lhe,k LS documents . This information was .sent to: • . Name Representing • Lam. l' oF e_iZtiOci 1 Mr. Paul Reitenbach, Chief, Community Planning Mr.Gregory M. Bush, Metro — Department of Wildlife . ' Ms. Gayle Kreitman, Department of Fisheries ' — Mr.Joe Robels, Habitat Management Director; ' Mr.James Lutz, Department of Transportation', . III ' — Mr.Jay Laughlin, City of Seattle ' Duwamish Tribal Office I - MucMeshoot Tribal Office D.L Lensegrav, Puget Power • • (Signature of Sender) . 3Q .. Sub cribed and sworn to me this / day of ` 19 7/ • ,,eepuu1i% AG,ARLT,� * I • 0 G�; Nota •Publ • in and for the co • --*,,. 0;ap : S f Wa in ton residing is,PA' FVe4/0 s, at 'I.0Jq�• s, 9a + ��� therein. " QA^VAf.��.�9�. Ow,,� e,� ................ ............................ ::{{:;;;:.ti: :}::;{•isi•i<..}:.}?":.::.}:•.}•:..:.::.�: •:.•r:i i:":�:`:: •i:•}::::•ii::}::•}i'.};.�.}iii:}•:i:•}:<: •::i::: ..:: i}•:.}.{.:.:: :.: : .•. .:� 1 ........ . .. .......... i 1 . 40F CITE OF RENTON "LL `+' Planning/Building/Public Works Department Earl Clymer, Mayor Lynn Guttman,Administrator April 11, 1991 Washington State Department of Ecology Environmental Review Section Mail Stop PV-11 Olympia,WA 98504 • SUBJECT: Environmental Determinations Transmitted herewith are copies of Environmental Determinations and Environmental Checklists for those projects reviewed by the Environmental Review Committee on April 10, 1991: DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED FUELING FACILITY&RETAIL BLDG CU;ECF-096-90 Applicant seeks to convert an existing full service station with to a fueling station with a convenience store on a 24,295 sf lot. The existing auto maintenance bays will be eliminated. Construction includes a single-story 1,250 s.f. retail bldg., 186 s.f. utility bldg, four fuel dispensers, and replacing three 12,000 gallon steel storage tanks with three new 12,000 gallon double wall underground fuel storage tanks. The project site is located at 301 South Grady Way. The 15 day comment period for these projects will end on April 30, 1991. Following the end of the comment period, the City will finalize its Determination unless comments received require a reevaluation. Following the finalization of the Determination,there is a required 14 day appeal period. If you have questions, please call Mark Pywell or me at 235-2550. For a Envir nme I eview Committee, • Donald K. Erickson,AICP Secretar y cc: Mr. Paul Reitenbach, Chief,Community Planning Mr. Gregory M. Bush, Metro Department of Wildlife Ms. Gayle Kreitman, Department of Fisheries Mr.Joe Robels, Habitat Management Director Mr.James Lutz, Department of Transportation Mr.Jay Laughlin, City of Seattle • Duwamish Tribal Office Muckleshoot Tribal Office D.L Lensegrav, Puget Power agncyttr/D E/kac 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 CITY OF RENTON IMAY 11991 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION CITY CLERKS OFFICE LeAnne Hutton ,being first duly sworn on oath states 51 067 that he/she is the Chief Clerk of the „(1139. t7 VALLEY DAILY NEWS �Y • Kent Edition • Renton Edition • Auburn Edition NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL Daily newspapers published six (6) times a week. That said newspapers DETERMINATION are legal newspapers and are now and have been for more than six ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTON months prior to the date of publication referred to, printed and published The Environmental Review Committee in the English language continually as daily newspapers in Kent, King (ERC) has issued a Determination of Non- County, Washington. The Valley Daily News has been approved as a legal ject(s) cunde Non- Significance-Mitigated for the following Re pro- ton under the authority of the Renton newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for Municipal Code. King County. FUELING FACILITY & RETAIL BLDG CU;ECF-096-90 Applicant seeks to convert an existing full The notice in the exact form attached, was published in the Kent Edition service station with to a fueling station with a convenience store on a 24,295 sf lot.The xx Renton Edition xx , Auburn Edition , (and not in existing auto maintenance bays will be elim- supplement form) which was regularly distributed its subscribers o s fibers inated. Construction includes a single-story during the below stated period. The annexed notice a1,250 s.f. retail bldg., 186 s.f. utility bldg, four fuel dispensers, and replacing three 12,000 gallon steel storage tanks with three #5 6 2 6 new 12,000 gallon double wall underground fuel storage tanks. The project is located at April 1 5 , 1 9 9 1 301 South Grady Way. was published on This decision will be finalized in fifteen (15) days. Written comments received after 5:00 p.m., April 30, 1991 will not be con- The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sidered. A fourteen (14) day appeal period will commence following the finalization of sum of$ 3 9 - 9 6 DNS-M. The mitigation measures imppsed by the City of Renton's Environmental ( 1-41441(111—' CA°C11— Review Committee are available at the Development Services Division,Third Floor, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington 98055. Phone: 235-2550. Published in the Valley Daily News April 15, 1991. 5626. Acct. No. 51067 Subscribed and sworn before me this 9 A day of APR 19 q-i — No Public for the State of Washington residing at Auburn, King County, Washington VDN k87 Revised 4/89 NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON,WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated for the following project(s) under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code. FUELING FACILITY&RETAIL BLDG CU;ECF-096-90 Applicant seeks to convert an existing full service station with to a fueling station with a convenience store on a 24,295 sf lot. The existing auto maintenance bays will be eliminated. Construction includes a single-story 1,250 s.f. retail bldg., 186 s.f. utility bldg, • four fuel dispensers, and replacing three 12,000 gallon steel storage tanks with three new 12,000 gallon double wall underground fuel storage tanks. The project is located at 301 South Grady Way. This decision will be finalized in fifteen (15) days. Written comments received after 5:00 p.m.,April 30, 1991 will not be considered. A fourteen (14) day appeal period will commence following the finalization of DNS- M. The mitigation measures imposed by the City of Renton's Environmental Review Committee are available at the Development Services Division, Third Floor, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington 98055. Phone: 235-2550. Publication Date: April 15, 1991 Account No. 51067 • • • pubnot NOTICE ENVIRONMENTAL . DECLARATION APPLICATION NO. CU;ECF-096-90 PROPOSED ACTION FUELING FACILITY&RETAIL BLDG CHEVRON USA, INC. APPLICANT SEEKS TO CONVERT AN EXISTING FULL SERVICE STATION WITH TO A FUELING STATION WITH A CONVENIENCE STORE ON A 24,295 SF LOT. THE EXISTING AUTO MAINTENANCE BAYS WILL BE ELIMINATED. CONSTRUCTION INCLUDES A SINGLE-STORY 1,250 S.F. RETAIL BLDG., 186 S.F. UTILITY BLDG, FOUR FUEL DISPENSERS, AND REPLACING THREE 12,000 GALLON STEEL STORAGE TANKS WITH THREE NEW 12,000 GALLON DOUBLE WALL UNDERGROUND FUEL STORAGE TANKS. • GENERAL LOCATION AND OR ADDRESS • 301 SOUTH GRADY WAY POSTED . TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW • COMMITTEE [E.R.C.3 HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION ❑DOES ' DOES NOT ' HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT • AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT • • • ®WILL,. jc•WILL NOT : BE REQUIRED. THE CITY OF RENTON WILL NOT ACT ON THIS PROPOSAL FOR 15 DAYS FROM THE DATE BELOW. COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY APRIL30, 1991 AN APPEAL OF THE ABOVE DETERMINATION MAY BE FILED WITH THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER BY 5:00 p.m, • FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON PLANNING DIVISION AT 235-2550. • DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION .' ernpsI • - CERTIFICATION I , Mctirr3 Snote Sim HEREBY CERTIFY THAT COPIES OF • THE ABOVE DOCUMENT WERE POSTED BY ME IN CONSPICUOUS 4p r40,4#OR NEARBY THE DESCRIBED PROPERTY ON 4- 16 ,moo P� •• .•...• .9 ## d• :yNssio �G .,� OTARy co .i/MUT: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a . D : pue� : NotEry Public, in and for the State of Washington D ; �L c : din .in , on the�6 SIGNED : `791c, �� ,"r'.� 1 ' so F • F9 i9g.• O�a� o �p O :...•• G� s NOTICE ENVIRONmENTAL DECLARATION APPLICATION NO. CU;ECF-096-90 PROPOSED ACTION FUELING FACILITY & RETAIL BLDG CHEVRON USA, INC. APPLICANT SEEKS TO CONVERT AN EXISTING FULL SERVICE STATION WITH TO A FUELING STATION WITH A CONVENIENCE STORE ON A 24,295 SF LOT. THE EXISTING AUTO MAINTENANCE BAYS WILL BE ELIMINATED. CONSTRUCTION INCLUDES A SINGLE-STORY 1 ,250 S.F. RETAIL BLDG., 186 S.F. UTILITY BLDG, FOUR FUEL DISPENSERS, AND REPLACING THREE 12,000 GALLON STEEL STORAGE TANKS WITH THREE NEW 12,000 GALLON DOUBLE WALL UNDERGROUND FUEL STORAGE TANKS. GENERAL LOCATION AND OR ADDRESS 301 SOUTH GRADY WAY POSTED . TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE C E.R.C. 3 HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION ❑DOES DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPAC T ON THE ENVIRONMENT. AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT ❑WILL. SWILL NOT BE REQUIRED. THE CITY OF RENTON WILL NOT ACT ON THIS PROPOSAL FOR 15 DAYS FROM THE DATE BELOW. COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY APRIL 30, 1991 AN APPEAL OF THE ABOVE DETERMINATION MAY BE FILED WITH THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER BY 5:00 P.M., FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON PLANNING DIVISION AT 2 3 5-2 5 5 0. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION envpstr • CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST NO.: ECF-096-90 APPLICATION NO(S): CU-096-90 PROPONENT: Chevron USA PROJECT NAME: Fueling Facility& Retail Bldg DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Applicant seeks to convert an existing full service station with to a fueling station with a convenience store on a 24,295 sf lot. The existing auto' maintenance bays will be eliminated. Construction includes a single-story,) 1,250 s.f. retail bldg., 186 s.f. utility bldg, four fuel dispensers, and; replacing three 12,000 gallon steel storage tanks with three new 12,000 gallon double wall underground fuel storage tanks. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 301 South Grady Way LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Development Planning Section The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). Conditions were imposed as mitigation measures by the Environmental Review Committee, under their authority of Section 4-6-6 Renton Municipal Code (see attached sheet). These conditions are necessary to mitigate environmental impacts identified during the environmental review process. This Determination of Non-Significance - Mitigated (DNS-M) is issued under WAC 197-11-340(2). Because mitigation measures have been imposed, the lead agency will not act on this proposal for fifteen (15) days from April 15, 1991. Any interested party may submit written comments which must be submitted by 5:00 p.m.,April 30, 1991, in order to be considered. A fourteen (14) day appeal period will commence following the finalization of the DNS-M. Responsible Official: Environmental Review Committee c/o Don Erickson, Secretary Development Planning Section Department of Planning/Building/Public Works 200 Mill Avenue South Renton,WA 98055 PUBLICATION DATE: April 15, 1991 DATE OF DECISION: April 10, 1991 SIGNATURES: Lynn A. utt arm,'Administrator DATE Departure t o Planning/Building/Public Works 1111116 Jot E.Webley,Administrator DATE Co v munity Service Department . • �/0 7/ Lee li a er, "ire Chief DATE Re o' Fire Department mitsig DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED MITIGATION MEASURES PROJECT: Fueling Facility&Retail Bldg PROPONENT: Chevron USA ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST: ECF-096-90 APPLICATION NUMBER: CU-096-90 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Applicant seeks to convert an existing full service station with to a fueling station with a convenience store on a 24,295 sf lot. The I existing auto maintenance bays will be eliminated. Construction includes a single-story 1,250 s.f. retail bldg., 186 s.f. utility bldg, four fuel dispensers, and replacing three 12,000 gallon steel storage tanks with three new 12,000 gallon double wall underground fuel storage tanks. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 1 30 South Grady Way CONDITIONS: The Environmental Review Committee issued a Determination of HI Non-Significance-Mitigated with the following conditions: 1. The applicant shall, in order to mitigate aesthetic impacts of the project, submit an amended landscaping plan. This plan shall provide the following items: a) a five foot wide landscape area and a five foot wide sidewalk along the south and west boundary of the project, b) an enhanced landscaping plan along S. Grady Way and c) a twenty foot long extension of the landscaping strip on the easterly side of the project site to bring the landscaping northerly, approximately even with the front portion of the proposed structure. This plan shall be submitted to the satisfaction of the Development Planning Section prior to the public hearing by the Hearing Examiner. 2. The applicant shall provide an agreement ensuring that: a) complete soils testing will be conducted in accordance with the State Department of Ecology standards; b) if during construction of these facilities contaminated soils are found, all construction will cease immediately; c) within one week of discovering the contaminated soils, the applicant shall submit copies of a soils remediation plan to the satisfaction of the Fire Prevention Bureau and the Department of Planning/Building/Public Works prior to the resumption of any work on the site; d) State Department of Ecology approval will be required for remediation activities; and e) that all commercial and industrial activities within 300 feet of the project site are notified of the soils remediation plan and provided with a schedule of events. The agreement shall be submitted to the satisfaction of the Department of Planning/Building/Public Works prior to the issuance of any site preparation/building permits for this project. Note: 2.1 The contaminated soils may either be disposed of in an approved waste site outside of the City of Renton or treated on site. 3. The applicant shall, in order to address impacts to earth and storm water management, provide a "hold harmless" agreement which acknowledges that the City has informed the applicant that the subject property is located in an area which may be included in an existing/altered 100 year flood plain, and that the applicants have decided to proceed, at their own volition, thereby waiving their rights to hold the municipality liable for any flooding and/or for any damages to property or person arising from such flooding. This document is to be approved by the City Attorney, and to be duly recorded prior to the issuance of site preparation/building permits. mitmeas-1 9 b 4. The applicant shall, in order to mitigate the impacts of increased traffic on area roads, provide the followingmitigation fee of $9 900.00 (220 trips X $45per trip) for the GradyWayTBZ prior to the 9 p issuance of site preparation/building permits. Note: The fee is based on the following: Trip Generation PM peak hour existing service station trips 108 PM peak hour convenience store trips 130 PM peak hour trip generation difference +22 (To convert from peak hour trips the ITE K-factor of.10 was used.) Daily Trip Generation Difference +220 220 Daily Trips X$45 per driveway trip = $9,900 The fee shall be deposited to account number 105/572/318.70.00.67 Grady Way TBZ/Chevron Facility 5. The applicant, in order to mitigate construction-related impacts (e.g., noise, dust, traffic) shall II submit a construction management plan including the following; a) an erosion control element; b) an element for the periodic watering of any disturbed soil on the site to reduce dust; c) an element for the limiting of hauling operations to the hours between 8:30 A.M. and 3:30 P.M.; d) an element for the protection of the existing storm drains from soils on site disturbed by construction activities; and e) a$2,000.00 cash deposit for street cleaning. This plan shall be submitted to the satisfaction of the Development Services Department of Planning/Building/Public Works prior to the issuance of site preparation/building permits and implemented throughout the construction phase of this project. NOTES: A. The applicant will need to apply for permits from the Fire Prevention Bureau for the removal of the existing underground storage tanks and the installation of the new tanks. B. The applicant will need to submit a sign plan for any new signs for the proposed development prior to the issuance of building permits. C. The applicant will need for provide storm drainage in accordance with the King County Surface Water Design Manual to the satisfaction of the Utility Services Division of the Department of Planning/Building/Public Works. D. The applicant will need toprovide a six foot wide sidewalk alongS. GradyWayand PP replace the existing street light in accordance with the City of Renton Municipal Code. E. The applicant shall provide drainage plans for the proposed development in accordance with the King County Surface Water Design Manual to the satisfaction of the Storm Water Section of the Department of Planning/Building/Public Works. The drains for the fueling stations will need to be tight lined to the sanitary sewer with approved water/oil separator, and a shut off valve to prevent large spills of flammable material from entering the sewer. Grade breaks in the pavement shall be installed in a manner to prevent storm water from the portion of the project not covered by the proposed canopy from entering the drain for the fuel pumping area. This plan shall be provided to the satisfaction of the Storm Water and Sanitary Sewer Sections prior to the issuance of site preparation/building permits. mitmeas-2 1 � ■ ROB.:AT H. LEE & ASSOC , .%TES, INC. ARCHITECTURE PLANNING ENGINEERING 1520 140th AVE.N.E. • SUITE 200 • BELLEVUE,WA 95005 • [206]746-4677 • PLANNING DIVISION JOHN W.JOHNBON Architect �l �I YY CI'{-,/OF RENpyTO APR 1 6 1991 R C W April 12, 1991 F* Mr. Mark R. Pywell, AICP Senior Planner City of Renton 200 Mill Ave. South Renton, WA 98055 Dear Mr. Pywell, This letter is to transmit a copy of the title report on the Chevron property on Grady way. Fortunately, there are some drawings in the title report that helped me understand the easements that go with it. If there is anything else you need, please give me a call. Sincerely, ROBERT LEE & ASSOCIATES fi41/44_ Mark Cross Senior Planner 8702\GRADYTI.LTR - I STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF RENTON ss. COUNTY OF ORANGE ) APR 1 6 1991 r°At EVE= ) On October 26, 1989, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said State, personally appeared J.W. Johnson K.A. Leighton, personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the persons who executed the within instrument as the President and Vice President on behalf of t") PACIFIC COAST HOMES, the corporation therein named, and acknowledged to me that such corporation executed the within instrument pursuant to its bylaws or a 0 resolution of its board of directors. 1.4 WITNESS my hand and official seal. OFFICIAL SEAL S. L DO'f+NBRbWSKI , �L NOTARY PUBLIC -CALIFORNIA ''� s� ORANGECOU�Y "NotaryPublic in and for said State My comm. expires SEP 13, 1993 { Page 1'o. 2 Order No. K51355 DESCRIPTION: 13xhibit A PARCEL A: That portion of the Northwest quarter of. the Northeast quarter of Section 19. Township 23 North, Range 5 East W.M. . described as follows: Beginning at the North quarter corner of said Section 19; THENCE Southerly along the West line of said Northeast quarter. 1100. 50 feet; THENCE North 77029'03" East 554.30 feet; THENCE South 00031'47" East 51.26 feet to the Southerly margin of Grady Way (S. S.H. No. 1-1) , being the True Point of Beginning; THENCE South 00031'47" East 150 feet; CI THENCE North 89028' 13" East to a point on the Westerly margin of an easement to the City of Seattle recorded under Recording No. 5687013; g THENCE continuing North 89028' 15" East 1.58 feet; c, THENCE North 00031'47" West 181. 15 feet to the Southerly margin of Grady Way (S. S.H. No. 1-L) ; r4 THENCE Southwesterly along said Southerly margin to the True Point of Beginning. P'( On (ALSO KNOWN AS Lot D of City of Renton Lot Line Adjustment LLA-001-88, recorded under Recording No. 8911139006. ) PARCEL B: An easement for ingress and egress over that portion of the Northwest quarter of the Northeast quarter of Section 19, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M. , described as follows: Beginning at the North quarter corner of said Section 19, THENCE Southerly along the West line of said Northeast quarter; 1100. 50 feet; THENCE North 77029'03" East 554.30 feet; THENCE South 00031'47" East 51.26 feet to the Southerly margin of Grady Way (S. S.H. No. 1-L), being the True Point of Beginning; THENCE South 0031'47" East 150.00 feet; THENCE South 89028'13" West 25.00 feet; THENCE North 0031'47" West 144.69 feet to said Southerly margin of Grady Way; THENCE North 77028'39" East along said margin 25.56 feet to the True Point of Beginning. PARCEL C: An easement for access over that portion of the Northwest quarter of the Northeast quarter of Section 19, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W. M. , decribed as follows: Commencing at the North quarter corner of said Section 19; THENCE Southerly along the West line of said Northeast quarter 1100.50 feet; THENCE North 77029'03" East 554.30 feet; THENCE South 00031'47" East 51.26 feet to the Southerly margin of Grady Way (S. S.H. No. 1-L) , THENCE South 00031'47" East 150.00 feet Page No. 3 Order No. K51355 THENCE North 89028' 13" East 146.73 feet; THENCE North 0031'47" West 84.92 feet to the True Point of Beginning; THENCE continuing North 0031'47" West 96.25 feet to the Southerly margin of Grady Way; THENCE North 77028'39" East along said margin 43.00 feet; THENCE South 0031'47" East 34.99 feet; THENCE South 20041'31" West 24.92 feet; THENCE South 34036'03" West 57.42 feet to the True Point of Beginning. PARCEL D: A non-exclusive easement for access over that portion of the Northwest quarter of the Northeast quarter of Section 19. Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M. , described as follows: Commencing at the North quarter corner of said Section 19; THENCE Southerly along the West line of said Northeast quarter 1100.50 feet; C'l THENCE North 77029'03" East 554.30 feet; cz THENCE South 00031'47" East 51.26 feet to the Southerly margin of Crady Way (S. S.H. (10 No. 1-L) ; CD THENCE South 00031'47" East 150.00 feet; t'y THENCE North 89028'13" East 146.73 feet; 'r'i THENCE North 0031'47" West 181. 17 feet to the Southerly margin of Grady Way; "4 THENCE North 77028'39" East along saidd margin 43.00 feet to the True Point of Beginning; JO THENCE North 77028'39" East along said margin 190.56 feet to the Beginning of a non-tangent curve to the left having a 60. 00 foot radius, the center point which bears South 12031' 21" East; THENCE Southwesterly along said curve through a central angle of 78000'26" an arc length of 81.69 feet to a point of tangency; THENCE South 0031'47" East 45.82 feet; THENCE North 87056'22" West 148.04 feet; THENCE North 20041 '31" East 24.92 feet; THENCE North 0031'47" West 34.99 feet to the True Point of Beginning. PARCEL E: A non-exclusive easement for parking over that portion of the Northwest quarter of the Northeast quarter of Section 19, Township 23 North, Range 5 East W.M., described as follows: Commencing at the North quarter corner of said section 19; THENCE Southerly along the West line of said Northeast quarter of said Northeast quarter 1100.50 feet; THENCE North 77029'03" East 554.30 feet; THENCE South 00031'47" East 51.26 feet to the Southerly margin of Grady Way (S.S.H. No. 1-L) ; THENCE South 00031'47" East 150.00 feet; THENCE North 89028'13" East to a point on the Westerly margin of an easement to the City of Seattle recorded under Recording No. 5687013; THENCE continuing North 89028'15" East 1.58 feet to the True Point of beginning; THENCE North 0031'47" West 84.92 feet; THENCE North 0036'03" East 57.42 feet; Page No. 4 Order No. K51355 THENCE South 87056'22" East 108.00 feet; THENCE South 0'31'47" East 127.00 feet; THENCE South 89028' 13" West 140.93 feet to the True Point of Beginning. Situate in the County of King, State of Washington. 00 9.4 JO • ,_.CISE TAX NOT REQUIRED ' riled for the reco•a King Co. Records Division at the request o► ,, Li LAWYERS TITLE COMPAN• By "`Q , Deputy / 3 / DECLARATION OF EASEMENT This Declaration dated as of this 30+4) day of October, 1989 , is made 'by Renton Village Associates , a Washington general partnership, consisting of Michael Sandorffy and Henrika Sandorffy, husband and wife, Morris D. Muscatel and Cynthia Muscatel , husband (.;"/a) and wife, and Michael Goldfarb ("Grantor" ) to Pacific Coast Homes , a California corporation ("Grantee") for the benefit of the real property described in Exhibit A attached hereto (the "Dominant Estate" ) and the owners, mortgagees, tenants and licensees from time to time of the Dominant Estate and their respective employees , agents , representatives, customers and invitees (collectively, the "Occupants" ) as described below. I . Recitals 1 . Grantor is the owner of the real property described in Exhibits B, C and D attached hereto (the "Roadway Areas" ) and the Tr real property described in Exhibit E attached hereto (the "Parking V1 Area" ) . O 2 . Grantee is the owner of the real property described in Imq Exhibit A attached hereto and by this reference incorporated c4 herein ( "Dominant Estate" ) . !mi � 3 . In order to assure access and parking for the Grantee, Grantor desires to grant a parking easement over and across the Parking Area and a road easement over and across the Roadway Areas . II . Declaration Grantor does hereby declare and convey to Grantee for the benefit of the Dominant Estate and the Occupants the following easements (the "Easements" ) , subject to the restrictions , reserva- tions and covenants set forth below: 1 . A perpetual , nonexclusive easement over and across the Roadway Areas for pedestrian and vehicular ingress to and egress from the Dominant Estate and the Parking Area, and Grady Way (a dedicated public street) and for repair and maintenance of the Roadway Areas; and 2 . A perpetual, nonexclusive easement and right of use and access to eight vehicle parking places located on the Parking Area . III . Restrictions , Reservations and Covenants The easements are granted subject to the following restric- tions , reservations and covenants : D 74v✓frk_ 4,• eke ,-/-6-),c 0574�scC 89/11/17 *0364 B ,, RECFEE 2.00 C7 e t/l 0x `�4-CL� ) RECD F 13.00 �, ,_ . , cASHSL ***15. 00 7 S �/� �j1 , /g 7 "�elZ y 55 f• + l 1. No obstruction shall be placed on the Roadway Areas which will obstruct the free flow of traffic thereon; 2. Grantor reserves the right to relocate from time to time the traffic flow across the area described on Exhibit D. 3. Should Grantor be required by the City of Renton or any other jurisdiction to delete the ingress and egress through the area shown on Exhibit D, said easement over the area shown on Exhibit D shall be terminated. be 4 . The Parking Area shall subject to reasonable rules and regulations adopted by Grantor. 5. Grantee shall not modify or obstruct the Parking Area. 6. Grantor reserves the right, without Grantee's consent, to relocate, replace, and/or modify the alignment, configuration, C, layout, and other features of the parking spaces in the Parking Area so long as eight parking spaces are provided on the surface or in a parking structure located on the Parking Area within a f-d reasonable distance from the Dominant Estate and so long as reasonable access thereto is provided. G0 7. The foregoing easements for ingress, egress and parking are subject to. any requirements and authority to be executed by the City of Seattle under instrument recorded under Auditor's File No. 5687013 and as to the easement area shown on Exhibit D is further subject to existing and future requirements or modifications thereof lawfully imposed by any government jurisdiction. Said easements shall not be deemed a public dedication. 8. Grantee shall have the right but not the obligation to pave, repair and maintain all or any portion of the Roadway Areas. 9. The Easements shall be easements running with the Dominant Estate and burdening the Roadway Areas and the Parking Area for the benefit of the Grantee and the Occupants. The restrictions, reservations and covenants set forth in this grant shall be binding upon, inure to the benefit of and be enforceable by the Grantor, Grantee, the Occupants and their respective- successors and assigns. 10. In the event of breach of or default under this grant, 1 Grantor or Grantee or any of the Occupants shall be entitled to commence an action for full and adequate relief from the con- sequences of such breach. The unsuccessful party in any such action shall pay to the prevailing party a reasonable sum for -2- it attorneys' fees incurred by the prevailing party in connection with such action, whether or not such action is prosecuted to judgment. 11. Nothing contained in this Declaration shall be deemed to be a gift or dedication of any portion of the Dominant Estate, the Roadway areas or the Parking Area to or for the benefit of the general public or for any public purposes whatsoever. This grant shall be strictly limited to and for the purposes expressly stated herein. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Grantor has executed this Declaration the day and year first above written. RENTON VILLAGE a Washington General Partnership rr QD its •--= 1 part C1 STATE OF WASHINGTON ) �, ss. 414 COUNTY OF KINGtoml ) On this 30:a) day of October, 1989, before me, the under- 00 . signed, Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared >i. .'-Q , to me known to be a General Partner of Renton Village Associates, a Washington general partnership, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of Renton Village Associates, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that he was authorized to execute the said instrument. NOT BLIC in and for the State of Washington, residing at I[c My commission expires: }/0 e 9GFL16/ 1I -3- EXHIBIT A DESCRIPTION: PARCEL A: . II That portion of the Northwest quarter of the Northeast quarter of Section 19, Township 23 North, Range 5 East W.M. , described as follows: Beginning at the North quarter corner of said Section 19; THENCE Southerly along the West line of said Northeast quarter, 1100. 50 feet; THENCE North 77029'03" East 554.30 feet; THENCE South 00031'47" East 51.26 feet to the Southerly margin of Grady Way (S.S.H:, No. 1-1), being the True Point of Beginning; 1, THENCE South 00031'47" East 150 feet; ':, THENCE North 89028' 13" East to a point on the Westerly margin of an easement to the LOCity of Seattle recorded under Recording No. 567013; THENCE continuing North 89028' 15" East 1.58 feet; Cs• THENCE North 00031'47" West 181. 15 feet to the Southerly margin of Grady Way (S.S.H. gpmf No. 1-L) ; ,4 THENCE Southwesterly along said Southerly margin to the True Point of Beginning; rq iv3 o rh • �' -4 • ` �' • EXHIBIT 'B' INGRESS & EGRESS EASEMENT THAT PORTION OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF TEE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 19; TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M. , DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE NORTH QUARTER CORNER 01P SAID SECTION 19; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID NORTHEAST QUARTER, 1100.50 FEET; THENCE NORTH 77°29'03" EAST 554.30 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00°31'47" EAST 51.26 PEET TO THE SOUTHERLY MARGIN OF GRADY WAY (S.S.H. NO. 1—L) , BEING THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 0°31'47" EAST 150.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89°28'13" WEST 25.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 0°31'47" WEST 144.69 FEET TO SAID SOUTHERLY MARGIN OF GRADY WAY; THENCE NORTH 77°28'39" EAST ALONG SAID MARGIN 25.56 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. CHEVRON tk. Hfr£ c BRH JOB NO. 86046.01 rYi � : AUGUST 15, 1989 STEVEN A. HITCHINGS -".,, �'4' SURV. 30 �_ • �r1 EIHIBIT "C" ACCESS EASEMENT THAT PORTION OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 19, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M. , DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE NORTH QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 19; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID NORTHEAST QUARTER 1100.50 FEET; THENCE NORTH 77°29'03" EAST 554.30 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00°31'47" EAST 51.26 FEET TO THE SOUTHERLY MARGIN OF GRADY WAY (S.S.H. NO. 1-L); THENCE SOUTH 00°31'47" EAST 150.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89°28'13" EAST 146.73 FEET; THENCE NORTH 0°31'47" - WEST 84 .92 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING NORTH 0°31'47" WEST 96.25 FEET TO THE SOUTHERLY MARGIN OF GRADY WAY; THENCE NORTH 77°28'39" EAST ALONG SAID MARGIN 43.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 0°31'47" EAST 34 .99 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 20°41'31" WEST 24.92 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 34°36'03" WEST 57.42 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. ��.�' �` H!t . - CHEVRON ° c BRH JOB NO. 86046.01 $ 4: © ( `Aipttirs5.1P AUGUST 21, 1989 TCHINGS � s STEVEN A. HI '� _ SURV. 30 r M. „ 73 •1�� •� 110 EXHIBIT "D" NON-EXCLUSIVE ACCESS EASEMENT THAT PORTION OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 19, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M. , DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE NORTH QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 19; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID NORTHEAST QUARTER 1100.50 FEET; THENCE NORTH 77°29'03" EAST 554.30 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00°31'47" EAST 51.26 FEET TO THE SOUTHERLY MARGIN OF GRADY WAY (S.S.H. NO. 1—L); THENCE SOUTH 00°31'47" EAST 150.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89°28'13" EAST 146.73 FEET; THENCE NORTH 0°31'47" WEST 181.17 FEET TO THE SOUTHERLY MARGIN OF GRADY WAY; THENCE NORTH 77°28'39" EAST ALONG SAID MARGIN 43.00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 77°28'39" EAST ALONG SAID MARGIN 290.56 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON—TANGENT CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A 50.00 FOOT RADIUS, THE CENTER POINT WHICH BEARS SOUTH 12°31'21" EAST; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 78°00'26" AN ARC LENGTH OF 81.69 FEET TO A POINT OF TANGENCY; THENCE SOUTH 0°31'47" EAST 45.82 FEET; THENCE NORTH 87°56'22" WEST 148.04 FEET; THENCE NORTH 20°41'31" EAST 24.92 FEET; ,? THENCE NORTH 0°31'47" WEST 34 .99 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. CHEVRON • etBRH JOB NO. 86046.01 vci ;,' AUGUST 21, 1989 t STEVEN A. HITCHINGS SURV. 30 •ao BUSH, ROED & HITCHINGS, INC. EXHIBIT " E ' NON-EXCLUSIVE PARKING EASEMENT THAT PORTION OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 19, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M. , DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE NORTH QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 19; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID NORTHEAST QUARTER 1100. 50 FEET; THENCE NORTH 77°29'03" EAST 554.30 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00°31'47" EAST 51.26 FEET TO THE SOUTHERLY MARGIN OF GRADY WAY (S.S.H. NO. 1-L); THENCE SOUTH 00°31'47" EAST 150.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89°28' 13" EAST TO A POINT ON THE WESTERLY MARGIN OF AN EASEMENT TO THE CITY OF SEATTLE RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 5687013; THENCE CONTINUING NORTH 89°28' 15". EAST 1 . 58 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 0°31'47" WEST 84 .92 FEET; '�" THENCE NORTH 0°36'03" EAST 57.42 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 87°56'22" EAST 108.00 FEET; 44.1 Cl THENCE SOUTH 0°31'47" EAST 127.00 FEET; ram- THENCE SOUTH 89°28' 13" WEST 140.93 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. .4 THE ABOVE EASEMENT PARCEL CONTAINS 17,547 SQUARE FEET. �%a �t j�f' • CHEVRON ti . •° '��a� t. BRH JOB NO. 86046.01 AUGUST 10, 1989 ���, STEVEN A. HITCHINGS :_ itsallf SURV. 30 89111:0304 EXHIBIT SKETCH _ *iii ...--.77-.7--- l� "'� Z of A; 1a"'oo' T.,. :7-:77:7777.m:i.N: ::Nini:::J;;::::. :!:-. .*;vo.00... E - 6,-3 .0 • p'. :* *, ....-i;:i .:4,-.t.: ::t...44•Aii::,i.::.0'...7...••!!'•::. !"."•!7.1:,• •::::•••:-: o 00 . W it ::.•::-........•..:•....':)• . :'ta..,• t` .... .iGiQ 'a N . .......:.....:....i .i:.:-:::::::. :i::::::. :::::...::i::..:•:•••:;,::i:.:.:...:::.::.•:::.::-if::::: :-.::.••::.•:•::...:A ., : : miii,,,,H,.:.::::z.::::,.....:::::„.E:::.,46.,;c54,..B::::::::..,„:„::::,::.: ::::.L..L.....4.... IS. 8 II S • 1fp, EXNIQIT ID I r / ° W e ( • I3 3 to ,? LEL " S\ 'o IIt a o - V i , I $ ° �' � 0 , 1 / z � ;� 1 o Z_Z.oa 14C..-13 ` 140.°f 3', __,, (i.... _ �� 89. 213s 13" W 28"7.coCo' `fi�,`^ II, H. y r. . e,K T ;. EXH161TIle; BUSH, ROED b HITCHINGS, INC. `err iirt s' CIVIL ENGINEERS 8 LAND SURVEYORS SEATTLE.WASHINGTON 3 4141 AUG.. IS, 19$n Tob 'Jo. 8(oo4Co.O1 t1A3 REV- 8-2.1-4Sa1 c'kk.✓rux i3oi- a 9f'�c 74/cw �} .-S i a. t W/7- 9e fo • 19/11,17 410628 D •RECD F 6.00 • fled for the mora RECFE 2.00 • • et the request of MUTUAL TERMINATION OF LEASE CRSH5- ****6.00 LA 5 55 Y _ 55 THIS AGREEMENT made by and between RENTON VILLAGE ASSOCIATES ("Renton"), a Washington general partnership and CHEVRON U.S.A. INC. ("Chevron"), a Pennayvlania corporation. ce 1 WITNESSETH WHEREAS, there is now operative between the parties a certain Lease recorded in King County, Washington under Recording No. 5758271 as extended by instrument recorded under No. 841221047; and OD WHEREAS, Chevron entered into an Option Agreement with Renton whereby Chevron vas granted an option to purchase the CD premises covered by the above described Lease; and r. '4 WHEREAS, Chevron assigned said option to Pacific Coast .4 Homes, a California corporation ("PCH"); and H WHEREAS, PCH has exercised said Option; and GO WHEREAS the parties hereto desire to terminate the said Lease upon the closing of the purchase by PCH of the said premises; NOW, THEREFORE in consideration of the mutual agreements of the parties, the parties do agree that the said Lease shall be deemed terminated as of closing of the PCH purchase. ' DATED this V1 day of November, 1989. RENTON VILLAGE ASSOCIATES: Z �- BYtILike441 .4.44---1,. • N - ID R_i. .�zr, CHEVRON U.S.A. INC.: - t-- By ® U a ® IL Im ® mar ' ® KM IL IL Im m U Im I ' m IL Im Im Im IE m KM SFN-2694 Juyers1itIe LIAR NO 491/mb Chevron USA Insurance Crporation NATIONAL HEADQUARTERS RICHMOND,VIRGINIA By: LAWYERS TITLE COMPANY OF WASHINGTON, INC. SCHEDULE A DATE OF POLICY: NOVEMBER 17, 1989 AT 10:18 A.M. AMOUNT OF INSURANCE: $500,000.00 POLICY NO. : 85-00-250-137 ORDER NO. K51355 PREMIUM: $1,820.00 1. Name of Insured: CHEVRON U.S.A. INC. , a Pennsylvania corporation 2. The Estate or Interest in the land which is covered by this Policy is a fee as to Parcel A and an Easement Estate as to Parcels B, C, D and E. 3. Title to the Estate or Interest in the land is vested in: THE NAMED INSURED 4. The land referred to in this Policy is situated in the County of King, State of Washington, and is described as follows: PARCEL A: That portion of the Northwest quarter of the Northeast quarter of Section 19, Township 23 North, Range 5 East W.M. , described as follows: Beginning at the North quarter corner of said Section 19; THENCE Southerly along the West line of said Northeast quarter, 1100. 50 feet; THENCE North 77029'03" East 554.30 feet; THENCE South 00031'47" East 51.26 feet to the Southerly margin of Grady Way (S.S.H. No. 1-1), being the True Point of Beginning; THENCE South 00031'47" East 150 feet; THENCE North 89028' 13" East to a point on the Westerly margin of an easement to the City of Seattle recorded under Recording No. 5687013; THENCE continuing North 89028' 15" East 1.58 feet; THENCE North 00031'47" West 181. 15 feet to the Southerly margin of Grady Way (S.S.H. No. 1-L) ; ' THENCE Southwesterly along said Southerly margin to the True Point of Beginning. (ALSO KNOWN AS Lot D of City of Renton Lot Line Adjustment LLA-001-88, recorded under Recording No. 8911139006. ) ® ® It j,. t ® ® ' I, ® 1M U U Im U m m III Im E IID U III I,. ® 1111 111 ® U I ® m m=m m m m _m f 1- m m m. m m m EVE m L- 1 -m---a m m it it m m m Juyers]JtIe Order No. K51355 Insurance @rporatlon Policy No. 85-00-250-137 Page No. 2 NATIONAL HEADQUARTERS .I RICHMOND,VIRGINIA PARCEL B: An easement for ingress and egress over that portion of the Northwest quarter of the Northeast quarter of Section 19, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M. , described as follows: Beginning at the North quarter corner of said Section 19, THENCE Southerly along the West line of said Northeast quarter, 1.100. 50 feet; THENCE North 77029'03" East 554.30 feet; THENCE South 00031'47" East 51.26 feet to the Southerly margin of Grady Way (S.S.H. No. 1-L), being the True Point of Beginning; . THENCE South 0031'47" East 150.00 feet; THENCE South 89028' 13" West 25.00 feet; THENCE North 0031'47" West 144.69 feet to said Southerly margin of Grady Way; THENCE North 77028'39" East along said margin 25.56 feet to the True Point of Beginning. PARCEL C: An easement for access over that portion of the Northwest quarter of the Northeast quarter of Section 19, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W. M. , decribed as follows: Commencing at the North quarter corner of said Section 19; THENCE Southerly along the''I West line of said Northeast quarter 1100.50 feet; THENCE North 77029'03" East 554.30 feet; THENCE South 00031'47" East 51.26 feet to the Southerly margin of Grady Way (S.S.H. No. 1-L), THENCE South 00031'47" East 150.00 feet THENCE North 89028' 13" East 146.73 feet; THENCE North 0031'47" West 84.92 feet to the True Point of Beginning; THENCE continuing North 0031'47" West 96.25 feet to the Southerly margin of Grady ' Way; THENCE North 77028'39" East along said margin 43.00 feet; THENCE South 0031'47" East 34.99 feet; THENCE South 20041'31" West 24.92 feet; THENCE South 34036'03" West 57.42 feet to the True Point of Beginning. PARCEL D: " A non-exclusive easement for access over that portion of the Northwest quarter of the Northeast quarter of Section 19, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M. , described as follows: Commencing at the North quarter corner of said Section 19; THENCE Southerly along the West line of said Northeast quarter 1100.50 feet; THENCE North 77029'03" East 554.30 feet; THENCE South 00031'47" East 51.26 feet to the Southerly margin of Grady Way (S.S.H. No. 1-L) ; _ __ni__ w w- in suif OM I Ir-III III III RI- III III IT III iT el III ® N 111 111 ® El _� _ m ® ®_ ,fir__I. ' i ® �__ m_ IOLA m i m I .wyers1itle Order No. K51355 ( 1pOra.t1OflInsurance Policy No. 85-00-250-137 Page No. 3 NATIONAL HEADQUARTERS RICHMOND,VIRGINIA THENCE South 00031'47" East 150.00 feet; THENCE North 89028' 13" East 146.73 feet; THENCE North 0031'47H West 181. 17 feet to the Southerly margin of Grady Way; THENCE North 77028'39" East along saidd margin 43.00 feet to the True Point of Beginning; THENCE North 77028'39" East along said margin 190.56 feet to the Beginning of a non-tangent curve to the left having a 60.00 foot radius, the center point which bears South 12031'21" East; THENCE Southwesterly along said curve through a central angle of 78000'26" an arc length of 81.69 feet to a point of tangency; THENCE South 0031'47" East 45.82 feet; THENCE North 87056'22" West 148.04 feet; THENCE North 20041'31" East 24.92 feet; THENCE North 0031'47" West 34.99 feet to the True Point of Beginning. PARCEL E: A non-exclusive easement for parking over that portion of the Northwest quarter of ttie Northeast quarter of Section 19, Township 23 North, Range 5 East W.M. , described as follows: Commencing at the North quarter corner of said section 19; THENCE Southerly along the West line of said Northeast quarter of said Northeast quarter 1100.50 feet; THENCE North 77029'03" East 554.30 feet; THENCE South 00031'47" East 51.26 feet to the Southerly margin of Grady Way (S.S.H. No. 1-L) ; THENCE South 00031'47" East 150.00 feet; THENCE North 89028' 13" East to a point on the Westerly margin of an easement to the City of Seattle recorded under Recording No. 5687013; THENCE continuing North 89028' 15" East 1.58 feet to the True Point of beginning; THENCE North 0031'47" West 84.92 feet; THENCE North 0036'03"' East 57.42 feet; THENCE South 87056'22" East 108.00 feet; THENCE South 0~31'47" East 127.00 feet; THENCE South 89028' 13" West 140.93 feet to the True Point of Beginning. Situate in the County of King, State of Washington. AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION OWNERS POLICY FORM B-1970 ®__ m B I ,:• . ,, ir 111 ir ® ® m _ ir it 111 i ® ® 111 ® f, m pi mu ® • "mmmmmm ® � ' mmmmmmmmmi mmmmmmmmma [ yers]JtIe .Order No. K51355 Insurance @rporation Policy No. 85-00-250-137 'Page No. 4 NATIONAL HEADQUARTERS RICHMOND,VIRGINIA SCHEDULE B PART I This Policy does not insure against loss or damage by reason of the following: 1. For additional Easements, Covenants, Restrictions and Reservations of Record, see Exhibit B attached. 2. Survey made March 25, 1986 (revised August 10, 1989 and August 15, 1989) by Bush, Roed and Hitchings, Inc. , under Job. No. 86046.00, disclosed the following: (a) Encroachment by concrete curbing and telephone booth over the Southwestern corner of said premises. (b) Encroachment by planting area and curb into the right of way for South Grady Way by 8 feet, more or less, (at widest point). (c) Encroachment by said area (surrounding tank area) over the Easterly line. (d) Said Survey is incomplete that it omits portions of Parcel D. • ICI IC m m m m ® m m m m m m m 111 m m m m m m m m m m m1, iH I! m C__C ®_ MI ® IL IL IL IL IL C IL EL IL IL I 111111C m KM MI IL m ® C Iyyers' ile Order No. K51355 Insurance @rporation Policy No. 85-00-250-137 Page No. 5 NATIONAL HEADQUARTERS RICHMOND,VIRGINIA EXHIBIT B 1. EASEMENT AND CONDITIONS CONTAINED THEREIN, AS GRANTED BY INSTRUMENT: Recorded: MARCH 10, 1947 Recording No. : 3664560 In Favor Of: City of Seattle Purpose: Electrical facilities Affects: Portion of the property herein described 2. EASEMENT AND CONDITIONS CONTAINED THEREIN, AS GRANTED BY INSTRUMENT: Recorded: JANUARY 14, 1964 Recording No. : 5687013 In Favor Of: City of Seattle Purpose: Electrical facilities Affects: Portion of the property herein described 3. EASEMENT AND CONDITIONS CONTAINED THEREIN, AS GRANTED BY INSTRUMENT: Recorded: MARCH 20, 1970 Recording No. : 6631805 In Favor Of: City of Renton Purpose: Water lines Affects: Portion of the property herein described 4. EASEMENT AND CONDITIONS CONTAINED THEREIN, AS GRANTED BY INSTRUMENT: Recorded: OCTOBER 27, 1973 Recording No. : 7310270580 In Favor Of: City of Seattle Purpose: Electrical facilities Affects: Portion of the property herein described 5. EASEMENT AND CONDITIONS CONTAINED THEREIN, AS GRANTED BY INSTRUMENT: Recorded: MAY 12, 1975 Recording No. : 7505120351 In Favor Of: City of Renton Purpose: Water line Affects: Portion of the property herein described 6. EASEMENT AND CONDITIONS CONTAINED THEREIN, AS GRANTED BY INSTRUMENT: Recorded: DECEMBER 31, 1986 Recording No. : 8612311880 Purpose: Roadway and parking Affects: Portion of the property herein described 7. EASEMENT AND CONDITIONS CONTAINED THEREIN, AS GRANTED BY INSTRUMENT: Recorded: ' AUGUST 10, 1987 Recording No. : 8708100374 In Favor Of: Puget Sound Power and Light Company Purpose: Electrical facilities Affects: Portion of the property herein described IKE 111 m 01 01 m E E IL m E m m E MI KM m ® E E In ;i i m IL ® IL ® ® m • ,ice., ��,C�II m m m m m, m 9 m m m m m m m m ® 1 m m m IMRE it III m Juyers1iile Order No. K51355 Insurance @rporation Policy No. 85-00-250-137 Page No. 6 NATIONAL HEADQUARTERS RICHMOND,VIRGINIA 8. EASEMENT AND CONDITIONS CONTAINED THEREIN, AS GRANTED BY INSTRUMENT: Recorded: AUGUST 10, 1987 Recording No. : 8708100375 In Favor Of: Pacific Northwest Bell Telephone Company Purpose: Communication facilities Affects: Portion of the property herein described 9. AGREEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: Between: Renton Village Associates And: Renton Joint Venture Recorded: AUGUST 21, 1987 Recording No. : 8708210528 Purpose: Reciprocal Parking Agreement and Easement 10. EASEMENT AND CONDITIONS CONTAINED THEREIN, AS GRANTED BY INSTRUMENT: Recorded: NOVEMBER 17, 1989 Recording No. : 8911170364 Purpose: Parking and access Affects: Parcels B, C, D and E END OF EXHIBIT B ® m m m_ m m m m m m m m ® m m m m m m m m ix m m m m m m m m m ORDER NO. X-i /J',5 .1S ESCROW NO. MORTGAGOR_ • Sec. / Twn.23_Rg..`� .---- all,! l'adr;61 - • 61-'Y irk ��- So trr14 v ,E,Er, 3`� .�-' -Pi P{.f /_r�' _ PAR G l:L r 1-S, /ye, o ,�v • v13( '17 N r).)� t� ' F/ACcIEL E. I Z N 0 v o NNNC, 73 - /'lo, 93 z ,cv S ay' c 2 ,' 1`3 '` This map does not purport. to show all highways, roads or easements affecting said property; no liability is assumed for variations in dimensions and location. • :;•::::::•::•;:•>:•:::•>:•::•:•:::D ARTfVI NT..O:F:.:;:::..;..;•• �M�13 •••..........:•:•:.�.......:.. ....... •::::•:•:>:::•:::::•:•.:•.:•.�:::::•:: ::<•::.*i*•::::::•; V MV1i. E .:::::::.:::::::::: :::.:.................. ................. E , .:•:::::::::.:::::.::::::::::::::::::::.::.:::::.:::::•::::.:::::.::::::::::: . • ::: .::::::.::.:: v. •.•:,>:::•;::»:•;:••iiii:::::::•:»::•::•:::::::::::::: :::; ili.:•.: ..:Reta.1.S.d .. :<•::::::::.�:::: : :......:..::. ::: �uelln ::seckY:.� e........:..:::g.;•:::::.::.:::.:<•:.�;:�:..�::•::.<.::�:.:;•:;;<.:;:•.�:.::•::•. IC 15 : i:.�CF'� .l.r�:� .. . :.•�.::::.:.. :: ::.:..:::.:.::::.: ::..:.::..:.::::.....:....:.�......:...... :.:.....::.....:.....:.:.:::.:.�.........:.:.:.:.......................s......•.G.. .>::�s.:.:.•..:.::...:�.:...:.�:.::..;..::.:..:�::.::::::-.::::.:.::. ` ... ..... P p: N F:p P: a6Y A plicant::seeks tvo � . �� 9..::.::....: :..Io:::: v ,:.::•. e: e ... .. . ...... .... ........ . . . ... .. '. ti :w :na:;felin ::: tatlon::: lth:::�:;:6 n .e. :.e: ce. ::•::.: ::. : :: : .. . :.:.:. •..:::::. .•.... ao il n. n :wl::be e mna : uGQ . IncudsCein9:opry : •::: : : : : a •:: d. . . . .s. .... : ue.:ds e.sers :nd.repa.. .n4::::hree . :: : : : : ::.::: »:•::•:::.;:::::.;::::::::. :•::.::.;::::::;:::.>:.1. ova: aron::•; t • ' r 9etanks + itrithreenoW: le:>. a 1::4inder. rvuhd:fuel sto age <i: ks : >:::: :>: : : •:>::::::<:::::::: :• :: :< ': ti:Ia 71 7111 .71ff1 ......:...:....: ................:.::..:..: ..................................:::::::::::::•:::::::::::::':::•::::::: ::::::::::::::•:::::'::::::::::::::......................... 1if 171I Ill fll l'llll fll .............. ............:..........:.....:.. .....:•:;...;..;........;....::v:':F+I I�1+1F4:Ffff 1:1:1Ff:1,H+f{fi 17:F1 N :..:::: .....:.:: ...: •:v •::; iN.N.H4IFN.FhH..1..1. r. !. ..7I171I.I..I Ls:::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::;3.p:1.:.Splth GradY NY•.........:...:.::•:::..:,:. :::::.:.�{• :::•... ....................... .......•...........................................�;.::.}....•... :fill: •�'I';t7i1717ll'I tlllfl'11111lf 1171 f•1•l1II,lll tl,tl••• l.hNN+I•;H:HhF1�:'F4-F;};'fllltf lt;,-,,, w.v,�::::•:::•.:�::.�:•.'r:::•r:.:'•ii:•'}' ':•Y::.•. ::;}v:•}}•..;•.�.}':: }}};•.}}::•:•:•tl}: 1.7;+i f�Fi-F1 . .. .....Fr!{..• ! .7..H4. F.H7.H4.....i...f. ..........................,:i ::ti:iiii:{:irii:::;{'{;::;{ :;{ iii ^i}:: i:�}:�:4ii:isis�:S::::ti?::i::i::::;: yj}:�:$iii::�:�:yr}::�•:::i$':''i•};:'{?•:::;'.j{:;¢;;.•.:.?.:{{ '•'ii'?{:•.}::,:...,.•::•::'•:•::: :;•:?•7?:'?I',;'.?b:;..r.•':C$:'r?i:::: t t . n : se•<Natural SavI.tonrnent,:Traffio�.:; :•:;•:•: ................. fees. t i .:: o Qn.ct. . re . ..h ru. 500rtW (*i'o y-_'6/- - __.•y , ^---- �_—r� AVM AOV JO ►linos : 4O .._.._f,},f' 'pp0��000'O'0'O'O'O.OA'O"oeu _ jf IlL eeee'eneoee� i�/ /i" 4 ! • _ _ '/.......... . A�.i r� r O• y % i z }i `J oI i 1-6� �y,. g i - J te �7 / 2 i I (i— • 1 ._ •* ---..,..... .. il /I1 , 1 (((� -, 1 i3 szi: _ice ....s , ` -=- _..� Wl ► .,.. ii wa , . - ---..� ercrpl2 Environmental Review Committee Staff Report Chevron Fueling Facility April 10, 1991 Page 2 • D • Aesthetics 1. The applicant shall, in order to mitigate aesthetic impacts of the project, submit an amended landscaping plan. This plan shall provide the following items: a) a five foot wide landscape area and a sidewalk along the south and west boundary of the project, b) an enhanced landscaping plan along S. Grady Way and c) a twenty foot long extension of the landscaping strip on the easterly side of the project site to bring the landscaping northerly, approximately even with the front portion of the proposed structure. This plan shall be submitted to the satisfaction of the Development Planning Section prior to the public hearing by the Hearing Examiner. Policy Nexus: Landscape Ordinance 4-31-34 and the Environmental Review Ordinance 4-6. Natural Environment 2. The applicant shall provide an agreement ensuring that:a) complete soils testing will be conducted In accordance with the City of Renton and the State Department of Ecology standards; b) if during construction of these facilities contaminated soils are found, all construction will cease immediately; c) within one week of discovering the contaminated soils, the applicant shall submit copies of a soils remediatlon plan to the satisfaction of the Fire Prevention Bureau and the Department of Planning/Building/Public Works prior to the resumption of any work on the site; d) State Department of Ecology approval will be required for remediation activities; and e) that all commercial and industrial activities within 300 feet of the project site are notified of the soils remediatlon plan and provided with a schedule of events. The agreement shall be submitted to the satisfaction of the Department of Planning/Building/Public Works prior to the issuance of any site preparation/building permits for this project. Note: 2.1 The contaminated soils may either be disposed of in an approved waste site outside of .I the City of Renton or treated on site. Policy Nexus: Underground Storage Tank Secondary Containment Ordinance 7-2, Environmental Review Ordinance 4-6 3. The applicant shall, in order to address Impacts to earth and storm water management, provide a,' "hold harmless" agreement which acknowledges that the City has informed the applicant that the; subject property is located in an area which may be Included in an existing/altered 100 year flood plain,and that the applicants have decided to proceed, at their own volition, thereby waiving their, rights to hold the municipality liable for any flooding and/or for any damages to property or person arising from such flooding. This document is to be approved by the City Attorney, and to be duly recorded prior to the Issuance of site preparation/building permits. Policy Nexus: King County Surface Water Design Manual, Environmental Review Ordinance 4-6 • Transportation 4. The applicant shall, in order to mitigate the impacts of Increased traffic on area roads, provide the following mitigation fee of $9,900.00 (220 trips X $45 per trip) for the Grady Way TBZ prior to the Issuance of site preparation/building permits. Note:The fee is based on the following: Trip Generation 1 PM peak hour existing service station trips 108 • • PM peak hour convenience store trips 130 PM peak hour trip generation difference . +22 (To convert from peak hour trips the ITE K-factor of.10 was used.) Daily Trip Generation Difference +220 220 Daily Trips X$45 per driveway trip = $9,900 The fee shall be deposited to account, number 105/572/318.70.00.67 Grady Way TBZ/Chevron Facility Policy Nexus: Ordinance 2827, Grady Way TBZ. i • ercrpI2c • • Environmental Review Committee Staff Report Chevron Fueling Facility April 10, 1991 • ' Page 3 • • Construction 5. The applicant, In order to mitigate construction-related impacts (e.g., noise, dust, traffic) shall' submit a construction management plan including the following; a) an erosion control element; b) an element for the periodic watering of any disturbed soli on the site to reduce dust; c) an element II for the limiting of hauling operations to the hours between 8:30 A.M. and 3:30 P.M.; d) an element,' for the protection of the existing storm drains from soils on site disturbed by construction activities; 1 and e) a$2,000.00 cash deposit for street cleaning. This plan shall be submitted to the satisfaction of the Development Services Department of Planning/Building/Public Works prior to the issuance of site preparation/building permits and implemented throughout the construction phase of this project. • Policy Nexus: Policies Element/Comprehensive Plan,Street and Arterial Plan NOTES: • 11 A. The applicant will need to apply for permits from the Fire Prevention Bureau for the removal of the existing underground storage tanks and the installation of the new tanks. • B. The. applicant will need to submit a sign plan for any new signs for the proposed development prior to the Issuance of building permits. C. The applicant will need for provide storm drainage in accordance with the King County'', Surface Water Design Manual to the satisfaction of the Utility Services Division of the Department of Planning/Building/Public Works. • D. The applicant will need to provide a six foot wide sidewalk along S. Grady Way and I! replace the existing street light in accordance with the City of Renton Municipal Code. E. The applicant shall provide drainage plans for the proposed development in accordance with the King County Surface Water Design Manual to the satisfaction of the Storm Water Section of the Department of Planning/Building/Public Works. The drains for the fueling stations will need to be tight lined to the sanitary sewer with approved water/oil separator, and a shut off valve to prevent large spills of flammable material from entering the sewer.,I Grade breaks In the pavement shall be Installed in a manner to prevent storm water fromaj the portion of the project not covered by the proposed canopy from entering the drain for • the fuel pumping area. This plan shall be provided to the satisfaction of"the Storm Water r and Sanitary Sewer Sections prior to the issuance of site preparation/building permits. This project was first presented to the Environmental Review Committee on February 13, 1991. At that time l'l the Committee had several concerns regarding aesthetics and traffic circulation. Staff has worked with the applicant to revise the site plan to mitigate the concerns of the Committee. The amended plans address • ,) some of the concerns of the Committee and staff has proposed some additional mitigation measures. These Issues are discussed in the Aesthetics/Land Use and Traffic Sections of this report. The applicant, Chevron Oil Company, is requesting to convert an existing service station located at 301 South Grady Way to a fueling station with convenience store. The proposed project will cause an increase,: In the traffic associated with this land use. As the project is located within the Grady Way TBZ,a fee will be ' assessed for roadway improvements. According to the FEMA maps for this area, the project is located within an area subject to flooding duringi 100 year storms. The FEMA maps indicate that majority of the project site is located above the 100 year flood plain. The underground•fuel storage tanks will be replaced with double wall fiberglass tanks. The'! new tanks will be located in a portion of the site that is located outside of the designated flood plain and will III be anchored in place in accordance with the Uniform Fire Code and the City of Renton Municipal Code to prevent their being forced to the surface during a flood. • Staff Is concerned with the lack of landscaping and site definition for the existing land use. Staff is recommending that additional landscaping be provided with the proposed development. The landscaping r should be used to define the boundaries of the project site and the proposed Ingress/egress points. The proximity of Village Place Shopping Center makes it desirable to get a visual buffer in this area too. • • erurpl2 • • Environmental Review Committee Staff Report Chevron Fueling Facility April 10, 1991 Page 4 The applicant has verbally.indicated that the proposed conversion of the service station might not be Implemented immediately following the approval of the conditional use permit by the Hearing Examiner. Staff will recommend to the Hearing Examiner that the conditional use permit should expire two years from the date of approval. • is 1. Whether the applicant has adequately Identified and addressed the following environmental Impacts likely to.occur in conjunction with the proposed development. .a. Aesthetics/Land Use Impacts: The proposed development includes demolition of the existing single-story, building which Includes service bays,construction of a new single-story, 1250 s.f. building, • without service bays, construction of a 176 s.f. utility building/restrooms and replacement! • ' of three 12,000 gallon underground fuel tanks. The new building will Include a convenience store. The Increase In traffic generated by the new development will be further discussed in the Transportation Section of this report. A 45 X 92 foot canopy will cover the main building and the four fueling stations. Two standard parking spaces and one handicapped parking space will be provided on site in accordance with the Municipal Code. The amended plans submitted by the applicant indicate a minimum 10 foot wide landscape strip along South Grady Way as is required by Code. The plans submitted by the applicant indicate that the majority of the landscape area along Grady Way will be covered by turf. Staff feels that the majority of the area should be planted with flowering shrubs or a flower bed to add some additional color to this area. The landscaping along the south boundary of the project should be a minimum of five feet wide in order to provide sufficient planting area for the proposed landscaping. At the February 13th meeting the ERC recommended that the applicant provide walkways within the landscape areas. This could be accomplished by,providing wider landscape areas to accommodate the sidewalks without interfering with Interior vehicle circulation. • Previously the applicant had not Indicated any landscaping along the east and west boundaries of the property which would Improve the aesthetics of the site and define the east and west Ingress/egress of the project site. The amended landscape plan provides landscaping along the east and west boundary of the project site. Staff recommends that the applicant submit a modified landscape plan indicating that the planter extend northerly an additional twenty feet along the easterly boundary of the project site. This should not Impact the movement of traffic on the project site. Mitigation Measures: See Recommendation#1. • Policy Nexus: Environmental Review Ordinance 4-6, Landscape Ordinance 4-31-34 • b. Natural Environment impacts: The existing site is almost entirely covered in asphalt, concrete and building. In the construction of the new project, the applicant will be providing new landscaped areas. The applicant has also Indicated that the site will no longer provide an area for repairing of automobiles. This should reduce some of the contaminates (e.g., oil) from coliectingj on the site and washing Into the storm drains. The applicant will need to Install oil/water separators to ensure that oil does not get Into the storm drains. If during the excavation of the existing underground steel storage tanks contaminated soils are found,the applicant will need to stop construction activities Immediately and to submit . a soils remediatlon plan to the Fire Prevention Bureau and the Development Planning Section of the Department of Planning/Building/Public Works within one week of • discovering the contamination. Construction will not proceed until the remediation plan has been accepted by City staff. This project is located within the 100 year floodplain area. The underground storage tanks will require special anchors to ensure that they do not shift during floods or periods of high 1 ercrp@ • , • Environmental Review Con ,ee Staff Report Chevron Fueling Facility April 10, 1991 Page 5 ground water. The design of the anchors will be reviewed, in accordance with the Municipal Code,at the time of building permit review. Mitigation Measures: See Recommendation#2. policy Nexus: Environmental Review Ordinance 4-6, Underground Storage Tank Secondary Containment Ordinance 7-2 • c. Traffic Impacts: 1. Construction Construction activities, including the excavation of the underground steel storage tanks and the remodeling of the existing service station, could generate traffic which would Impact area roadways during peak traffic. Based on the fact that S. Grady Way is a Major Arterial, measures will be required (limiting hauling operations to the hours between 8:30 A.M. and 3:30 P.M.) to mitigate traffic impacts from Hauling activities on area roadways. 2. Operation The traffic study prepared by the Transpo Group, dated January 15, 1991, indicates that the conversion of the existing service station to a fueling station with a convenience store will Increase the traffic generated by the development by 220 trips per day for a total of approximately 1,200 trips per day. As the project site is located within the Grady Way TBZ a fee, as calculated below, will be assessed. The Transportation Division has • reviewed the traffic study and found it to be adequate. Trip Generation PM peak hour existing service station trips 108 PM peak hour convenience store trips 130 PM peak hour trip generation difference +22 Daily Trip Generation Difference +220 220 Daily Trips X$45 per driveway trip = $9,900 The fee shall be deposited to account number 105/572/318.70.00.67 Grady Way TBZ/Chevron Facility per Ordinance 2827. The $45 fee is based upon the convenience retail use. Other land uses in this TBZ may be assessed higher fees. The existing service station does not have defined Ingress/egress driveways on the east or west boundaries. This leads to a confused traffic pattern that will only get worse as traffic increases. Staff recommends that the applicant amend the site plan and landscaping plan to provide two defined access driveways on the west boundary and one on the east rboundary. Concern was raised at the February 13th meeting that the access shown, on the plans to Grady Way from the east side of the project could be eliminated by future building unless It is protected by an easement. The applicant has stated that this access is protected by an existing easement. A copy of this easement will be submitted to staff prior to the review by the Hearing Examiner. • Mitigation Measures: See Recommendations#4 and #5. Policy Nexus: Community Facility Goals/Comprehensive Plan ercrpl2 Environmental Review Committee Staff Report Chevron Fueling Facility April 10, 1991 Page 6 d. Noise, Light and Glare Impacts: 1) Construction: Noise, light and glare are anticipated In conjunction with construction activities. Some mitigation of these impacts will be achieved through restrictions on hauling, hours and construction activities. No additional mitigation measures will be; required as the site Is surrounded mainly by office and light industrial uses (e.g.' auto dealerships). 2) Operations: The existing service bays will not be included in the new service station. Noise, generated by the repairing of vehicles will be eliminated. New lights will be installed as part of this project. The plans Indicate that the lights are designed to' retain glare on the project site. The perimeter landscaping recommended by staff should ensure that any glare produced on the project site is retained on site. Mitigation Measures: See Recommendation#6. Policy Nexus: Commercial Policies/Comprehensive Plan. e. Public Services ' 1) Police and Fire Service • Impacts: Police and Fire Prevention Bureau staff report adequate resources to provide anticipated services to the site during construction activities and operations with system improvement fees and with Code-required Improvements • The Fire Prevention Bureau staff has indicated that the project will be required to comply with U.F.C. and Ordinance 4144 regarding the Installation of new • underground storage tanks. Mitigation Measures: None required. • - - - Policy Nexus: N/A 2) Storm Water Impacts: The majority of the project site will be covered by impervious materials after the completion of construction on the project site. The Storm Water Section of Planning/Building/Public Works has indicated the project must meet the requirements of the 1990 King County Surface Water Design Manual. The applicant proposes to cover the fueling station area with a canopy. Storm water in this area will pick-up spilled fuel, oil and other contaminates that should not be directed to the storm water drains. City and Metro staff recommend that storm water collected in this area be diverted to the sanitary sewer lines so that It can be treated properly. • Mitigation Measures: See Recommendation#3. Policy Nexus: King County Surface Water Design Manual (As adopted by the City of Renton), Environmental Review Ordinance 4-6 f. Construction impacts: Improvements to the site and off-site are required in conjunction with the development of the service station which will generate noise, dust, debris and traffic. Standard construction mitigation measures should adequately address these impacts. Mitigation Measures: See Recommendation#6. policy Nexus: Policies Element/Comprehensive Plan ewrpt2 • • Environmental Review Com-m-thee Staff Report Chevron Fueling Facility April 10, 1991 Page 7 .i�rfV'i�t�:�E...PAM�TiUi�1�T.:.��:;>: :..:.:::::::.::;•<.>::.::.::.:.:.�:::::::::<:.;:.::.::.::.:<.;•�:..::.�:.::;;: 8S t}.GK?nl h S> ::::�>:<:>:::::<:»::. :: �t >. ents::hava rcyfew.edand oammen�ed.a�p�n•>: e p•a1:>::.::.;::::;::»:.>:: ::: :::>: ::.:::::::>:: ;• ;:.>:.::.::.::................... . LAND USE Police Department: Approved. All glass Is to be non-reflective. • Fire Prevention Bureau: Approved with standard conditions. Installation of new UST's to comply with UFC&Ordinance 4144. Storm Water: The project must meet the requirements of the 1990 King • • County Surface Water Design Manual. The applicant to furnish storm drainage analysis and calculations for the site. Water Utilities: One new fire hydrant will need to be Installed on the • south side of Grady Way to meet Fire Dept. required fire flow. Sewer Utilities: . Installation of side sewer to new building location will have to meet current City of Renton codes. Parks and Recreation: Approved. See environmental comments. Construction: Approved. Development Planning: Must comply with following codes: CU, parking, landscaping, grade&fill, storm,fire, building. Long Range Planning: Approved subject to provision of mitigation measures for potential fire and explosion hazards,to the satisfaction of Fire Dept. ENVIRONMENTAL Police Department: Project not expected to have significant Impact as it Is replacing an existing operation:: Fire Prevention Bureau: Required to comply with UFC & City Ordinance 4144 (UST regulations). Storm Water: Minor impact to existing storm drainage system. Water Utilities: Minor impact to.the existing water system. Sewer Utilities: No impact on the existing sanitary sewer system. Parks and Recreation: Recommend the proponent review the Proposed Trails Master Plan and future pedestrian access connection to Renton Village Shopping Center. Construction: Probable minor Impact. Development Planning: 1) Landscaping should be thematically Integrated with Center; 2) Check on-site parking re: code requirements;• 3) Check nonexclusive parking - cannot be used to meet parking requirements-also It appears to be In a roadway; 4) Check with traffic on volume Impacts; access points seem quite close to the street - will there be queueing, onto Grady; 5) I wonder about safety & aesthetics from, outdoor lavatories; 6) will excavation require PSAPCA permits?; 7) I8 soils study necessary re: tank removal; and 8) What about storm drainage/flooding -water table, is high here. ercrpl2 • Environmental Review Committee Staff Report Chevron Fueling Facility • April 10, 1991 Page 8 • Long Range Planning: The proposed land use Is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. However, the proposed protect; may create environmental health hazards, such as fire; • and explosion. Adequate mitigation measures should be, • • required. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ererp12 ............................................................................... i. � Y: E April 10, 1991 To: Lynn Guttmann, Planning/Building/Public Works Administrator John Webley, Community Services Administrator Lee Wheeler, Fire Chief From: Don Erickson, Secretary 0 ........... »�ocaXlvri: : ::: :�:>�::<::.:..::.::..:::d:�locr.:..:an.::.::e::..:..:.:.:.................................................:..::..:::::.�:..::.�:.:...:.:........................ Agenda attached below. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA • APRIL 10, 1991 Third Floor Conference Room Commencing at 10:00 AM • TIME/KEY PARTICIPANTS NEW ARCO AM/PM UNDERGROUND FUEL STORAGE TANKS REMOVAL (Mary Savela: 6170) . ECF-012-91 Environmental review of a proposal to remove the underground fuel storage tanks located at an abandoned • ARCO AM/PM Mini-Mart. There are five tanks at this site; one 10,000 gallon tank, two 6,000 gallon tanks, and two 4,000 gallon tanks. The project site Is 3123 NE Sunset Blvd. CHEVRON USA, INC. CU;ECF-096-90 (Mark Pywell: 5586) Applicant seeks to redevelop an existing service station on a 24,295 sf lot. Construction includes an 11,000 sf bldg, four fuel dispensers, and three new 12,000 gallon fuel tanks. The project is located at 301 South Grady Way. BLACK RIVER CORP PARK, PHASES VII/VIII FINALIZATION OF MITIGATION MEASURES ECF;SA;SM-071-88&ECF;SA-109-88 (Don: 6181) Phased construction of six office buildings and a parking structure. The project is divided Into two tracts. The project is located on Oakesdale Avenue. cc: J. Covington, Executive Assistant to the Mayor • L.Warren, City Attorney F. Kaufman, Hearing Examiner G. Gotti, Fire Marshal J. Hanson, Development Services P. Pierce, P/B/PW Admin ■` ROBL-.IT H. LEE & ASSOC..4TES, INC. ARCHITECTURE PLANNING ENGINEERING 1E20 140th AVE.N.E. • SUITE 2O0 • BELLEVUE,WA 9E005 • [B06]746-4677 JOHN W.JOHNBON Architect PLANNING DMSION March 8, 1991 CITY OF RENTON 991 Mr Mark Pywell, AICP MAR I 2 1 Senior Planner RECEIVED City of Renton 200 Mill Ave. South Renton WA. 98055 Dear Mr. Pywell, This letter is to detail for you the changes in the Site Plan submitted March 7, 1991. We reduced the lawn area in front and added a row of Rhododendrons as well as additional shrubs at the Northeast corner. A landscape island has been added along the , western boundary to define the ingress and egress. This was also . done along the eastern boundary. We checked the proposed plant list against the plant inventory provided from the Cinema remodel project. We found the tree type which we proposed is the same as the Cinema. Changes were made to our shrub and groundcover list to make it more compatible with the surrounding commercial area. The new plan reduces the size of existing driveways and expands the landscaped areas on site. In addition, the proposed signage for the site was put on a second sheet for review prior to the Public Hearing, per your request. Also attached is one copy of colored drawings of the proposed buildings and proposed free standing sign. Having reviewed the Threshold' determination for the BP Mini-mart on the Benson Highway and the Hearing Examiner's decision on the Village Place north proposal, we have a better idea of the types of conditions normally attached to projects in Renton. If there is anything else you need for the Public Hearing or the Environmental Review Committee please do not hesitate to call me. Sincerely, ROBERT LEE & ASSOC M' Mark Cross cc. Jim Truhan, Robert Lee and Assoc. Jay Hummel, Chevron USA Inc. 8702\final.ltr THE HALLMARK CONCEPT From the ground up, Chevron's p s Hallmark station has been designed }. _ with your community in mind. The . . simple architecture, open layout, „0, el neutral building colors, materials ra- �.�44 or ° AridORM a and graphics have been carefully t° .at 4Ael w :0,1 , •, •.�'akg 4.00 +0. ,• a + selected to meet our customers'aes- rb �� a 14 r` :• I. A .•_.r, • i-' . .+r .�. it thetic and functional needs. The v "° 40'. °6� j ' ••w - ,L` ° t '►, :04 ,, Chevron clear identification of services, �"' r em r -. i y!'Ky!$•. .., w..R*<� . .i..rlr r ••r..a..r�.� T ,-'7 -9 productofferingstv .:wr.. .<�...ca.w�.a.o� �... � v+.r.-..w•+x'�a. '_ amenities, and �v � , .•w: �• �,• ' ? ,:�- .,. - .. -,. . prices has been highly integrated 6.',,, ",& ••s .� ..at. MIN Food Mart e , limma,m....._ to communicate a controlled and 4 .4.-I bill I ■ $1116.1. Emil— consistent message. /ItM r i '"*a,,,, i"Y in""' Vill .F ----c„ -- — , IL 7?1111011 ... -: :, 4.1640. . •o y � o P_ l* a 42,4,44 ON PI AWNINGDi r CITY CA' ; 121991 IDENT IT Y SIGN The identity sign is a key element in Chevron's Hallmark program. It has been designed to provide clear and consistent communication of Ithtli. the Chevron brand, ancillary ser- - C rr vices (such as Food Mart) and product prices. 7b eliminate visual clutter and allow for safer, long-range recognition FoOd M by motorists, the identity elements Faso, F�/r are surrounded by a gray field andSiff "e EGUEpqcontemporary support structure. AADEG gooOmodular system for displaying these E O 0o9omessages ensures clean and consi.tent communication. 0.00 01 Also, due to the coordinated look of the Hallmark system, the need for high-square footage signs is minimized. WIDTH HEIGHT OVERALL SQ. FT. 7'5" 16' 11" 125 4 r\ r‘ FEB 28 '91 15:39 ROBERT H LEE & ASSOC P. 1 _ - -----' Number of pag (Including c o : FfOm: '__ r: ---v— ROBERT 11. LEE & ASSOCIATES, INC. .___r4 A#*CNrTECTURE PLANNlNU ENGiNEERING ' 1561O K40oh Ave.N.I. • SUITE SOO ,• IM[LLwur.WA 06O05 • mom 7 577 FAX # (206) 746-6836 Date: I+ CITY OF R NTON / orv/ Py .+�✓G' # MAR o 1 1991 To: ii ia, l 'yzevr — . REcEiVED /_ Re: 1/r 5e ro/Lr 5r 11 G Pall Facility . R.H.L. Job # 7d21/1 -,/ e-\-- , .7____ _ 11 Tom` v 6 v&C- /' -e y a ci 497 i____,e6__ T.,,, l_22L_________ 7 _A---- 45//eiti ,.., -.7L . I-1,044 _.�. 7/----c h-e--- 1/44> .Ir ? � c-4-.R - a-f--VL(44--e/Scf_z27-, We., A,,,:, (_,...,-_-_,4 i/ .A.-cliJ :v.i.. 471/44,A i-e--4.---' 1r"(t.-F-41 17T� 10671/11:11.--7 S" . 1 gir 4 7 e 5 -71 p V.:1)cl/ 7___ 7,1,,,e____ r A .-( 2: z. .7/sue / - - 4 6 e k l . G-3 --/-- / /Z. -_'.0r ( saw .i -a/e-e,- (--.5" e-* 1.21/1 tom, l 70- _ . 71.--wlevi ki , 177...077 1-7 '-'4'1,-- (:a IR Are:Ode'Ve:____ 1 (1.1" .5/27e-ev .. .---- A C-ii---7.. 2__. .-_. _ _ _ , {iF...YOU DO NOT RECEIVE ALL :PAGES,.;'PLEASE CALL IMMEDIATELY. - _..,.. .. :v.'�tiw'k..!,„'e -i':,lw:+..'.:::'S:'-..l�dzdC: .t4..;,r_... ..._. .... ,... l CITY OF RENTON MEMORANDUM DATE: February 1, 1991 TO: Mark Pywell FROM: Clint Morgan SUBJECT: CHEVRON FACILITY/ CU; ECF-096-90 30/ Upon reviewing the attached document it is my opinion the report is well documented and accurate as possible for the given conditions. Purpose of the report was to determine the appropriate transportation benefit zone fee for the Grady Way zone which is calculated a $9,900.00}n the study. This is an acceptable determined amount. --- This information well be provided on their review sheet when recircu ted. 91 CEM015 cc: Gregg Zimmerman f ./0 /06/57. /3/2, 70 . od. 6 7 CITY OF RENTON MEMORANDUM DATE: February 1, 1991 TO: Mark Pywell FROM: Clint SUBJECT: CHEVRON FACILITY/ CU; ECF-096-90 Upon reviewing the attached document it is my opinion the report is well documented and accurate as possible for the given conditions. Purpose of the report was to determine the appropriate transportation benefit zone fee for the Grady Way zone which is calculated a $9,900.00 in the study. This is an acceptable- determined amount. This information well be provided on their review sheet when recirculated. 910EM015 cc: Gregg Zimmerman Transportation and Traffic Engineering !. • PLANNING • DESIGN C1SIA r1 ',1 The .I 1661. i z wvr Transpo • Group NO1N311 SO AUG NOISING SNINNVII January 15, 1991 TG: 91203.00 1 • Mr. Mark Cross Robert H. Lee&Associates 1520 - 140th Avenue NE, Suite 200 Bellevue,WA 98005 11 1, SUBJECT: CHEVRON-RENTON -TRIP GENERATION STUDY • • Dear Mr. Cross: This letter report documents the increase in daily trip generation associated with the conversion of the referenced project from an existing service station with gas pumps to a it convenience store with gas pumps. The trip-generation analysis was used to assess a Transportation Benefit Zone (TBZ)fee to the project. The study complies with the scope of ,1 work requested by Mark Pywell of the City of Renton. Project Description The project site is located on Grady Way, east of Rainier Avenue S in Renton. The proposed ,1 project is a remodel of an existing service station with gas pumps to a convenience store II with gas pumps. The proposed convenience store would be 1,258 gross square feet (gsf) with eight fueling positions. Currently,there are eight fueling positions and two automotive repair bays at the existing service station. 11 Trip Generation Methodology The difference in PM peak hour trip generation associated with the conversion from service station to convenience store use was estimated from a PM peak hour trip generation survey ,i at the existing service station and national data on convenience store trip generation from 1, the Institute of Transportation Engineers(ITE). This difference in PM peak hour trip gener- ation was then factored to obtain the daily difference in trip generation between the service station and convenience store use. The study was conducted in this way because of the difficulty in obtaining accurate daily trip generation information from the existing service• it station. Li Trip Generation Analysis - - A PM peak hour driveway count was performed at the existing service station by The TRANSPO Group on January 9, 1991. The existing service station generated 108 PM peak hour trips. • I II • [I I - The TRANSPO Group,Inc. 147,15 Bel-Red Road,Suite 100 Bellevue,Washington 98007 FAX:2061747-3688 2061641-3881 Mr. Mark Cross The January 15, 1991 Trans Page 2 Group Data from the 1TE article, 'Trip Characteristics of Convenience Markets with Gas Pumps" (ITE Journal,July 1987)was used to estimate the PM peak hour generation from the pro- 1 posed convenience store. A copy of this article is attached to this letter. The ITE article found that the average PM peak hour trip generation of a convenience store with gas pumps is 130 trips/hour,based on a survey of five convenience stores with gas pumps. This is • considered to be a somewhat conservative estimate of PM peak hour trip generated by the proposed project since the convenience stores surveyed in the ITE article were much larger than the proposed project. The average store size from the article was 2,009 gsf; 758 gsf larger than the proposed convenience store. Larger convenience stores with gas pumps 11 tend to attract more non-gasoline customers and trips by offering a wider variety of goods. Based on this information,the proposed convenience store would generate 22 more PM peak hour trips than the existing service station. To estimate the daily increase in trip generation by the proposed project, the ratio of PM peak hour traffic to daily traffic (K-factor) of 0.10 was used. This K-factor was derived from the information contained in the above referenced 1TE article. Applying the K-factor results in an estimated daily driveway trip increase of 220 trips due to the proposed project. Table 1 summarizes this ,1 analysis. Table 1. Trip-Generation Analysis Trip Generation PM Peak Hour Existing Service Station Trips 1081 PM Peak Hour Convenience Store Trips 1302 PM Peak Hour Trip Generation Difference +22 11 Daily Trip Generation Difference +2203 1 From driveway count taken by The TRANSPO Group on January 9, 1991. 2 From'Trip Characteristics of Convenience Market with Gas Pumps,'ITE Journal,July 1987. • 3 Estimated with K-factor of 0.10. K-factor from"Trip Characteristics of Convenience Markets with Gas Pumps," ITE Journal,July 1987. Transportation Benefit Zone Fee II The project proponents will be required by the City of Renton to participate in the Trans- portation Benefit Zone (TBZ) fee program since the project site is within the TBZ. The increase in daily driveway trips by the proposed remodelling project is the basis of the TBZ fee calculation. Mr. Mark Cross The January 15, 1991 Transpo Page 3 Group The proposed project is classified as convenience retail by ITE land use classifications. The TBZ fee for convenience retail is$45 per driveway trip. As shown in Table 1, the proposed project is estimated to generate an additional 220 daily driveway trips. Therefore, the pro- ject proponents will be required to contribute$9,900 to the TBZ fee program. We trust that this letter sufficiently addresses the information requested by the City of Renton regarding your project. If you have any questions regarding this analysis or if you need further information, please call me at your convenience. Sincerely, The TRANSPO Group, Inc. J. Hann Lee Transportation Engineer JHL/JNP/mlc Attachment i dr.,.. :_,_ __ Trip Characteristics of Convenience Markets with Gas Pumps by The Montana Technical Committee of the Intermountain Section of ITE Convenience markets with gaso- plus all trips leaving the site over a block number)? line pumps have flourished given period of time. 2. Is that your home, work place, throughout the United States in • Primary trips:Trips from home, work, school,shopping place,or other? the past 10 years.The growing demand or school to the convenience market 3. Where are you going from here for self-service gasoline and conven- that return directly to point of origin. (street and block number)? fence grocery goods, readily accessible The trip's only purpose was shopping 4. Is that your home, work place, , with fast service,have fueled a boom in at the convenience market. school,shopping place,or other? the convenience market business. As • Diverted linked trips:Trips in which the 5. Do you usually pass by this store? transportation engineers and planners, stop at the convenience market is part 6. Did you go out of your way to stop we are asked to determine the impacts of a sequence of two or more stops here today? of developments on the transportation within the total trip and where the stop Each interviewer had the discretionary system.Because the convenience mar- at the convenience market required a power to vary the language to suit his or ket is a relatively new concept and lim- route diversion from the route that her individual communication skills. Be- lted data exist in the literature on the trip would otherwise be followed if the stop cause all interviewers were professional characteristics of these stores, we de- at the convenience market were not transportation engineers and planners, cided to study the trip characteristics of made. the intent of the questions was well convenience markets with gas pumps in • Nondiverted linked trips: Trips in known, and throughout the progress of the Billings, Montana, area. The objec- which the stop at the convenience the study, the wording and approach to fives of the study were to market is part of a sequence of two or the interviews were adjusted to improve M 1. Define the trip generation character- more stops within the total trip and communication with those being inter- istics of convenience markets with where the driver was already traveling viewed. gas fwmPs- on the street on which the conven- The most critical problems observed 2. Analyze the trip characteristics of pa- ience market is located. were questions involving origins and trons to these markets. destinations and interpreting whether the 3. Determine the trip assignment char- motorist really understood the concept acteristics for these markets by dis- Methodology of going out of your way. Frequently our tinguishing primary trips, diverted Local convenience markets with gas data indicated that the stated origins and • linked trips, and nondiverted linked pumps were plotted on a map to deter- destinations would require a completely trips- mine general site characteristics;the different route than what the motorist de- • characteristics are listed in Table 1.Store scribed as on the way.Recognizing that Definitions managers or store headquarters were people do not necessarily follow the contacted for permission to survey their most logical routing because of acquired Certain terms used in this report are sites. Five sites on arterial streets were habits or for other reasons,the answers defined as follows: selected for the survey. At each site, to question number six were accepted • Convenience market with gas pumps: three people conducted the survey:one unless a significant route deviation was A store that sells convenience food person recorded all traffic movement in apparent and could not be explained. In items, gasoline products, and other and out of the site, and two interviewed that case, the interview response was car products and that is usually open customers. deleted from analysis. 15 to 16 hours per day. It has self-ser- The interviewers were stationed near The total number of customers at the ' vice gas pumps and between 1400 the entrance of the building and at- five sites during the interviews was 639. and 2400 square feet of gross floor tempted to interview everyone entering Of that total, 461 customers, or 72%, area;one person manages the store. the store. Each interviewer had a data were interviewed, and only 25 re- • Trip:A single or one-direction vehicle form on which to record responses as sponses were deleted as being invalid. movement with either the origin or des- the questions were asked. A total of six Only 179 customers (28%) declined to tination inside the study site. questions were asked: be interviewed or were missed. The • Trip ends:The total of all trips entering 1. Where did you come from(street and committee considered the interview suc- PIE JOURNAL/JULY 1987 43 1 cess ratio good in light of the quick-stop sections,and 14 were located at signal- Site Access.Characteristics nature of this type of store. ized intersections. At the five sites surveyed, 50,i Closeness to the interstate inter- 40%to Findings change was a factor for 25%of the listed the���t ee ring r site ret is a nfror stores. Most stores were located on the main street Where there a non Site Characteristics mountable median, it is obvious that all major arterials intercepting the corn- these trips will be right-turn entrances) Based on information from the yellow muter traffic, with high trip generation A ited for n�'e0%to 40%,ex.' pages of the Billings, Montana, tele- peaks corresponding to the commuterII phone direct onto the main street.Twenty-five tct directory,under"Grocers Retail," traffic.Eighty-eight percent of the stores � 35%�the trips approached the site or and from field observations, we an convenience ma withgas plotted were located in commercial areas.Only the minor street away from the arterial pumps three were isolated within a dominant and a similar percentage exited the site on a map. The dominant chain names residential district serving as a neigh- were: Superette, Express Mart, E-Z borhood grocery and commuter inter- away from the main street.sSixty percent to 80%of the site exits took place on n the Shoppe, Kwik Way, Quik Mart, Super- ceptor.The average convenience market minor street.As the sites are small and America, and Speedy Mart. All stores. in Billings has about 2,100 square feet of there is a high were located along arterial streets. gross floor area and has eight gasoline g peak factor, situations Twenty-one stores were located at inter- pumps. with conflictstoat the r ss and eartiurn larly with left-turn ingress and left-turn egress,can be very hazardous.The sit- Table 1.Site Characteristics uation was worse at sites with no access control (no curb, gutter, sidewalks) on Intersection the side street. Site Major Adjacent Street Minor Adjacent Street Control 1 Principal arterial Collector Signal Trip Generation Five lanes—no parking, Two lanes—parking both All of the surveyed sites had similar two way(flush center sides,two way .- layouts and a building size between1 left-turn lane) 1400 and 2400 square feet of gross floor, 1984 AADT= 20,000 1984 AADT= 5,500 area(Table 2). 2 Principal arterial Local STOP control The following independent variables, Four lanes—no parking, 'Two lanes—parking both on local were analyzed using linear regression to two way street determine their correlation (Table 3) to 1984 AADT= 22,000 1984 AADT = 1,500 the observed trip generation: 3 Principal arterial Local STOP control • Gross square feet of building Six lanes with left-turn Two lanes—no parking on local • Number of gasoline pumps i pockets in raised two way street • Total traffic adjacent to the site median,no parking, • Distance to the central business dis-i two way 1984 AADT = 2,000 1984 AADT = 25,000 trlCt(CBD) Each of these variables proved to 4 Principal arterial Local Signal have a poor correlation to trip generation Six lanes with left-turn Two lanes—parking both pockets in raised sides,two way (R = .22 to.09)except for the distance median,no parking, to the CBD that had a correlation coef- two way 1984 MDT = 2,000 ficient (RZ) equal to 0.902, with the 1984 MOT = 28,000 higher trip generation being closer to the 5 Principal arterial Local Signal CBD. It is noted,however,that,distance Four lanes with left-turn Two lanes—no parking to the CBD is not recommended for use pockets in raised in estimating trip generation,as this var- median,no parking, table is not site related,and this specific two way correlation to trip generation would not 1984 MDT = 13,500 apply to other cities. Traffic volume surveys were done dur- Table 2.Trip Generation at Convenience Stores with Gas Pumps Distance ' Trip Generation Square Feet Number of from•CBD Site Location 3 Hours Sum AADT of Building Gas Pumps (Feet) 1 Broadwater-16th St.W. 345 25,500 2,400 6 12,900 2 Broadwater-1st St.W. 493 23,500 1,789 6 3,900 3 Main—Logan 200 27,000 2,100 6 16,200 4 Main—Milton 281 30,000 2,400 6 14,500 ' 5 Ken's Interstate 206 13,500 1,357 10 12,500 44 ITE JOIJRNAL/JULY 1987 I 1 1 i ing the morning,noon,and evening peak asked to estimate the percentage of their morning trip origins are home based, hours for all five sites,and at one site a business done during the three peak and the majority of trip destinations are traffic count was conducted for the entire hours of an average day.They estimated to work. This is not surprising and re- 16 hours of operation on average week- that 25%of their business was done dur- flects a large number of last-minute con- days.To estimate average weekday trip ing those hours. The 16-hour traffic venience store stops in the morning on generation, the store managers were count was also analyzed, and it was the way to work.The origins and desti- found that 24% of the daily trips were nations during the noon hour were Table 3.Correlation Factors during the three peak hours for that evenly split between home and work count.Table 4 summarizes the average trips.One location near an interstate in- Distance to CBD =x trip generation rates that were found per terchange did show a large percenta 9e y= a,x + ao site. (35%)of"other"origins,with the major y= -0.0225 x+ 573.39 Figure 1 shows the results of the 16- ity of its noon destinations going to work R2= 0.313 hour site traffic count.It is recommended (44%)and home(30%). R = 0.902 that trip generation for convenience mar- At all the surveyed locations but one, Square Feet of Building =x kets with gasoline pumps be estimated the eveningtri u se was the o ! y= a,x +a, r site within the ra p p pPo y = -0.0241 + 368.28 nge of 800 to 2,000 site of the morning trip purpose.The ma'•�` R2 = 0 0088 vehicle trips per site on an average jority of the trips originated at work and R = .094 weekday taking into account the site Ia- Sum ADDT=x cation,site characteristics,the adjacent Table 4.Average Trip Generation ! y= a,x+a,, street characteristics, and traffic vol- per Site y= 4.4926 x+ 213.05 umes. R2= 0.00486 Time Period Trip Ends Range R= .220 Origin/Destination peaI Number of Pumps =x As part of the interviews with cus- N0000nl� k h hour 96 57-165 y=410.98 x- 12.42 tomers,data were collected on the pur- Eveningpeak hour 130 86-209 ,R2= 0.0387 R = pose of the other ends of the conven- Weekday 1,300 800-2,000 ience market trips. The majority of Based on five surveyed sites in Billings,Montana. F 1',I .4)40 � Don't pull your hair out . . . We have the motors that you need! is 4 V► , _to,,, .....1 !i 4*4 o To Fd: r Eagle Signal Marbelde ' �i - ;'' ' ;Pl Crouse-Hinds .:... ,... • ,.... --...„:„.. '-„r4 ' Kentron - Econolite/GE Automatic Signal _ �,. 4r Y_. .. Y •. • Motors to fit your every need. • Quick service . . . low, low prices! • Motors for dial units, camshaft s, flas hers, coordinators ands sy nchrolizers.chrolizers. oGENERAL TRAFFIC EQUIPMENT CORP. 218 Willow Street • Yonkers, NY 10701 • (914)965-9292 Ask about our other fine traffic control products! • IrE JOURNAUJULY 1987 45 1 ended at home. At the location that did originate within one mile of the conven- large extent, on existing traffic on the not have a majority of evening trip des- fence market.As would be expected,the street system and do not generate traffics tinations terminating at home, the site location at the interstate interchange at- Our study found that, in fact, over 60% location was along a major suburban ar- tracted much longer trips than the down- of the trips were nondiverted linked trips. terial with other shopping/services land town or suburban locations. Diverted linked trips accounted for an=, uses nearby. The majority of trip desti- other 25%to 30%,and primary nations from this site(60%)fell into the Trip Type trips counted for only 10%to 15%, on aver "other'category. The determination of trip type was one age. The trip type percentages were TripRange of the primary objectives of our study.By fairly constant over the three peak hours, 9 identifying the trip type(i.e.,primary,di- of the day studied.Table 5 presents the' The range of the trips to and from the verted link,or nondiverted link)we could average trip type percentages for the convenience market was plotted for each estimate the impact of convenience mar- three peak hours. site.The two scales used to plot range kets with gas pumps on the transporta- were miles and minutes.The ranges se- tion system.The same interview method Conclusions 1 lected for plotting were 0.5,,1, and 2 had been used to study trip type at re- miles;and 2,4,and 6 minutes.Analysis gional shopping centers.' These data This report presents the findings of a of the range data indicates that 50%to were of interest to the committee for use study of trip characteristics of conven- 60%of trips are less than 2 miles or 6 in quantifying claims that convenience fence markets with gas pumps in Bill- minutes. Also, a large number of trips markets draw entirely, or at least to a ings, Montana. The findings presented should be used with judgment. Billings • has 110,000 persons in the metropolitan Table 5.Trip Type:Summary of 5 Sites area, which is characterized by urban Percentage of Total Traffic sprawl and a heavily car-oriented corn- munity.Trip characteristics may be quite 1 Homing Peak Noon Evening Peak different in larger cities where more pub- Trip Type Average Range Average Range Average Range sic transportation is available and where Primary 6 0-10 13 9-17 13 5-21 more pedestrian traffic.occurs.Also, Diverted linked 30 12-38 25 14-33 25 9-34 convenience markets in Montana are al- Nondiverted linked 64 58-85 62 50-70 62 55-83 lowed to sell beer and wine. Trip char- i acteristics may be different where laws restrict the sale of alcoholic beverages, , FIGURE 1. Site Traffic Generation or where convenience markets do not I 16-hour convenience market with gas pumps have gasoline pumps. 120- J i References 110- 1. Slade,Louis J.,and Gorove,Frederick E."Re- I. ductions in Estimates of Traffic Imps of Regional 1 - Shopping Centers."ITE Journal Vol.51,No.1,Jan- 1- nary 1981,pp.16-18. ci z 90- z U LL 80 - The data contained in this report reflect cc a the findings and views of the Montana , ~ -ul Technical Committee. The contents do 70not have the approval of, nor are they c a necessarily the views of,the Intermoun- 0 60 - fain Section,the Institute of Transporta- tion Engineers Technical Council,or the 50 - Institute of Transportation Engineers In- temational Board of Direction. Members of the Montana Technical ' 40 - Committee of the Intermountain Section of ITE who participated in this project i i i 1 i 1 i i i i i i i i i i are: Robert Marvin, chairman; Leon 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Howe;Ken Behling;James Fells; Gary 1 HOUR ENDING Huttmann;Richard Jacobson; Pierre Jomini;Chad Lutey;H. Terry Smith;and I Figure 1. Site traffic generation:16-hour convenience market with,gas pumps. Pat Vandell. 46 IYE JOURNAL/JULY 1987 1 i tramir: _ CIT. OF RENTON -=.,_ Planning/Building/Public Works Department Earl Clymer, Mayor Lynn Guttman,Administrator February 15, 1991 • Mark Cross Robert H. Lee&Assoc.; Inc. 1520-140th Ave NE, Ste 200 Bellevue,WA 98005 SUBJECT: Chevron Fueling Facility&Retail Bldg CU;ECF-096-90 Dear Mr.Cross: This letter is written on behalf of the Environmental Review Committee and is to inform you that they have completed their review.of the,environmental.impacts of the above-referenced.project. The Committee, on April 10, 1991, decided that your project may be issued 'a threshold Determination of Non-Significance- I Mitigated with the following conditions: • See enclosed Mitigation Measure document. Because the Environmental Review Committee imposed specific mitigation measures rather than issue a II, Determination of Significance, there is a required 15 day comment period during which comments are i solicited from various agencies, jurisdictions or individuals (including the applicant) who may have an interest in the Committee's decision. The comment period will end April 30, 1991. Following the end of the comment period, the City will finalize its Determination unless comments received require a reevaluation. i Following the finalization of the Determination,there is a required 14 day appeal period. WAC 197-11-660 states that the responsibility for implementation measures may be imposed upon an applicant only to the extent attributable to the identified adverse impacts of the imposed action. Since an environmental impact statement has not been prepared for this project,any mitigation measure established by the ERC not directly attributable to an identified adverse impact is deemed to be voluntarily accepted by the applicant. Staff urges you to contact the various City representatives, as appropriate, (e.g.,the Public Works Division) as soon as possible,to obtain more information concerning specific mitigation elements recommended for this project, if you have specific questions. This information will assist you in planning for implementation of your project and will enable you to exercise your appeal rights more fully, if you choose to do so. In addition,'by the end of the comment period, we should be able to establish a tentative public hearing date before the Hearing Examiner, should a public hearing be necessary. If you have any questions or desire clarification of the above, please call Mark Pywell or me at 235-2550. r the Environme vie C mmittee, Donald K Erickson,AICP Secretary • I cc: • • Chevron USA, Inc. 1301 -5th Ave, Room 2900 Seattle,WA 98101 ercdean/DKE/Me 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 "` CIT1 ,OF RENTON "LL Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Earl Clymer, Mayor Lynn Guttmann, Administrator PLANNING DIVISION Clly OF RENTON January 10, 1991 JAN 1 01991 Mr Mark Cross ( VED Robert H. Lee & Assoc, Inc. 1520 140th Ave. NE, Suite 200 Bellevue, WA 98005 SUBJECT: CHEVRON FUELING FACILITY & RETAIL STORE S. GRADY WAY, RENTON, WASHINGTON Dear Mr. Cross: This letter is in response to your correspondence dated December 21, 1990 to Mark R. Pywell of the City's Planning Division, which has been forwarded to me for comment. ISSUE 1) Is credit given in determining . potential mitigation amount for traffic generated by the existing auto service and fueling facility? ANSWER: The answer is yes to the question above. However, we do need a reliable. .documented source of the average 24 hour trips in and out of the existing facilities and secondly, we need your estimated number of trips generated on completion, based of the ITE. trip generation manual or other documented authoritative source if not property classified in the trip generation manual. The Transportation Benefit Zone fee is based on the increase of traffic generated. The assessment fee is based on the following classifications: LAND USE TYPE BENEFIT ASSESSMENT COST/DRIVEWAY TRIP Industrial. $207 Office $170 General Retail $ 80 Convenience Retail $ 45 ISSUE. 2) Are there copies of the ordinance adopting the Transportation Benefit Zone? ANSWER: Yes, copy enclosed. 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 Mark Cross _ January 10, 1991 Page 2 If I can be of any further assistance, please let me know. My telephone number is 277-6216. Ve y T my Yo s, Clinton Morgan Transportation Specialist cc: Mark R. Pywell, Senior Planner 0 Gregg Zimmerman, Plan Review Supervisor CEM008 , I li • • I ROF RT H. LEE & ASSO ATES, INC. /'--j� 4- 7;44° ' ARCHITECTURE PLANNING ENGINEERING 4I 1820 140th AVE.N.E. • SUITE E00 • BELLEVUE,WA 98005 • MOB]746-4877 JOHN W.JOHNBON Arentect December 21, 1990 Mr. Mark R. Pywell, AICP PNNINGDW Project Manager I City of Renton 200 Mill Ave South DEC 3 1 1990 Renton, WA 98055 • Dear Mr. Pywell, Thank You for the prompt transmitting the request for information from the Technical Advisory Committee regarding auto trip generation by our proposed Chevron Fueling Facility and Retail Store. We ' will, contract with an Engineering firm specializing in Transportation Engineering to answer the question related to estimated trip generation. in negotiating a contract for engineering services, we ,need to know two things. A. Is credit given, in determining potential mitigation amounts, for the traffic generated by the existing Auto service and Fueling facility? This is critical in knowing how much analysis of existing traffic generation we need to include in the contract for services. There must be some remodel or change of use proposal, for an existing structure, previously reviewed that provides precedent. B. Are there copies of the Ordinance adopting the ,Transportation Benefit Zone for Grady Way that would help us understand the traffic impact analysis that the City does and the information the City needs to complete its analysis. I understand that our project can not move to review by the SEPA Review Committee until this additional information is provided. • Sincerely, ROBERT H LEE & ASSOC. , INC. -MAX' Mark Cross cc. Jay Hummel, Engineer, Chevron USA INC. 8702\trafimp.ltr ' I • CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON RESOLUTION NO. 2827 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, ADOPTING A TRAFFIC MITIGATION PLAN FOR THE 'GRADY WAY TRANSPORTATION BENEFIT ZONE AS A CITY POLICY UNDER THE STATE ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT. WHEREAS, the City, of Renton has undertaken a study of traffic conditions known as the Grady Way Benefit Area Assessment Study; and WHEREAS, the area within the Grady Way Transportation Benefit Zone has experienced rapid growth which generates substantial additional traffic; and WHEREAS, the transportation system is inadequate to support the present development and the projected business development within the Grady_ Way Traffic Benefit Zone. • NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I. The above recitals are found to be true and correct in all respects. SECTION II. The Grady 'Way Transportation Benefit Zone is hereby created with its boundaries as follows: The Burlington Northern Railway main line on the west, Burlington Northern east side branch on the north, and I-405 on the east and south. SECTION III. The Grady Way Transportation Benefit Area Assessment Study is hereby adopted by the City of Renton as a factual document .and the traffic mitigation charges included therein are hereby adopted by the City of Renton as policy under the State Environmental Policy Act. 1 RESOLUTION NO. 2827 0 SECTION IV. The administrative staff is 'authorized and directed to apply the mitigation fee in an equitable manner, to negotiate fees under this policy in a manner that utilizes sound engineering and legal principles, and to coordinate and cooperate with developers and property owners to utilize sound planning and engineering practices which reduces daily trips and thereby reduces the need for transportation mitigation. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this 3rd day of December , • 1990. .6?-/Y-&U, -,��r,E/ Marilyn . /P tersen, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this 3rd day of December , 1990 . E r lyme , ay r Approve s to form: Lawrence J. War n, City Attorney RES.84-03/27/90-as. 0 -2- CITY OF RENTON • MEMORANDUM DATE: January 28, 1991 TO: Clint Morgan,Traffic Specialist FROM: Mark Pywell, Senior Planner SUBJECT: Chevron Facility CU; ECF-096-90 Attached is the traffic analysis you requested for the project referenced above. It is my understanding that this information is needed for you to be able to determine the TBZ fees. If any further information is required, please let me know. Thank you. CIJNTMMO LROBEIIT H. LEE St ASSOdmATES, INC. ARCHITECTURE PLANNING ENGINEERING 16E0 140th AVE.N.E. • BUITE 200 • BELLEVUE,WA 98005 • [206]746-4677 i 1 JOHN W.JOHNBON Architect January 17, 1991 op A orm 1,66L L z Nvr Mr. Mark R. Pywell, AICP Navaudokuo Department of Planning/Building Public Works NoISmeom Nt1'4 City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA. 98055 Dear Mr. Pywell: In response to your letter dated December 21, 1990; requesting traffic estimates for the proposed Chevron Facility located at 301 S. Grady Way, Renton, Wa. ; I am forwarding nine copies in addition to the original report. We hope the results of the study is sufficient information to allow the Environmental Review to be completed. We were surprised at the end of December to hear about the Transportation Benefit Zone (TBZ) Ordinance. Now that we are in receipt of Mr. Clint Morgan's letter which included a copy of the City Council Ordinance, we understand that the ordinance was just recently adopted December 3, 1990. This explains why it was not, mentioned in the original TAC meeting in September 1990. If you require additional copies or information, I would be glad to provide them, please contact me at (206) 746-4677. Technical questions in respect to the methodology of the study, should be directed to Mr.. Hann Lee, the Traffic Engineer with The Transpo Group, who conducted the study for our company. Mr. Lee can be contacted at (206) 641-3881. Again, if there is anything else you need, please contact me. Sincerely, W,V( 14---- ----------- Mark Cross Enclosures CC: Jay Hummel, Engineer Chevron USA, Inc. 8702\traff.[tr' . I Transportation and Traffic Engineeriny PLANNING • DESIGN • The • Transpo Group January 15. 1991 TG: 91203.00 Mr. Mark Cross Robert H. Lee &Associates 1520 - 140th Avenue NE. Suite 200 Bellevue.WA 98005 SUBJECT: CHEVRON-RENTON-TRIP GENERATION STUDY Dear Mr. Cross: This letter report documents the increase in d trip generation associated with the conversion of the referenced project from an exis service station with gas pumps to a convenience store with gas pumps. The trip-generation analysis was used to assess a Transportation Benefit Zone (FBZ fee to the project. The study complies with the scope of work requested by Mark Pywell of the City of Renton. Project Description The project site is located on Grady Way, east of Rainier Avenue S in Renton. The proposed project is a remodel of an existing service station with gas pumps to a convenience store with gas pumps. The proposed convenience store would be 1.258 gross square feet (gsf) with eight fueling positions. Currently,there are eight fueling positions and two automotive repair bays at the existing service station. Trip Generation Methodology The difference in PM peak hour trip generation associated with the conversion from service ' station to convenience store use was estimated from a PM peak hour trip generation survey at the existing service station and national data on convenience store trip generation from the Institute of Transportation Engineers(ITE). This difference in PM peak hour trip gener- ation was then factored to obtain the daily difference in trip generation between the service station and convenience store use. The study was conducted in this way because of the difficulty in obtaining accurate daily trip generation information from the existing service station. • Trip Generation Analysis A PM peak hour driveway count was performed at the existing service station by The TRANSPO Group on January 9, 1991. The existing service station generated 108 PM peak hour trips. The TRANSPO Group,Inc. 14715 Bel-Red Road,Suite 100 Bellevue,Washington 98007 FAX:2061747-3688 2061641-3881 Mr. Mark Cross The January 15, 1991 Transpo Page 2 Group Data from the ITE article, 'Trip Characteristics of Convenience Markets with Gas Pumps" (TIE Journal,July 1987)was used to estimate the PM peak hour generation from the pro- posed convenience store. A copy of this article is attached to this letter. The ITE article found that the average PM peak hour trip generation of a convenience store with gas pumps is 130 trips/hour, based on a survey of five convenience stores with gas pumps. This is considered to be a somewhat conservative estimate of PM peak hour trip generated by the proposed project since the convenience stores surveyed in the ITE article were much larger than the proposed project. The average store size from the article was 2,009 gsf; 758 gsf larger than the proposed convenience store. Larger convenience stores with gas pumps tend to attract more non-gasoline customers and trips by offering a wider variety of goods. Based on this information, the proposed convenience store would generate 22 more PM peak hour trips than the existing service station. To estimate the daily increase in trip generation by the proposed project, the ratio of PM peak hour traffic to daily traffic (K-factor) of 0.10 was used. This K-factor was derived from the information contained in the above referenced ITE article. Applying the K-factor results in an estimated daily driveway trip increase of 220 trips due to the proposed project. Table 1 summarizes this analysis. Table 1. Trip-Generation Analysis Trip Generation PM Peak Hour Existing Service Station Trips 1081 PM Peak Hour Convenience Store Trips 1302 PM Peak Hour Trip Generation Difference +22 Daily Trip Generation Difference +2203 1 From driveway count taken by The TFIANSPO Group on January 9, 1991. 2 From Trip Characteristics of Convenience Market with Gas Pumps,'ITE Journal,July 1987. 3 Estimated with K-factor of 0.10. K-factor from'Trip Characteristics of Convenience Markets with Gas Pumps,' ITE Journal,July 1987. Transportation Benefit Zone Fee The project proponents will be required by the City of Renton to participate in the Trans- portation Benefit Zone (TBZ) fee program since the project site is within the TBZ. The increase in daily driveway trips by the proposed remodelling project is the basis of the TBZ fee calculation. . f Mr. Mark Cross The January 15, 1991 Ti'anspoPage 3 Group The proposed project is classified as convenience retail by ITE land use classifications. The TBZ fee for convenience retail is$45 per driveway trip. As shown in Table 1, the proposed project is estimated to generate an additional 220 daily driveway trips. Therefore, the pro- ject proponents will be required to contribute$9,900 to the TBZ fee program. We trust that this letter sufficiently addresses the information requested by the City of Renton regarding your project. If you have any questions regarding this analysis or if you need further information, please call me at your convenience. Sincerely, The TRANSPO Group, Inc. l � I J. Hann Lee Transportation Engineer JHL/JNP/mlc Attachment i'- , • z:.% . . • . .. • Trip Characteristics of Convenience Markets with Gas Pumps • by The Montana Technical Committee of the Intermountain Section of ITE Convenience markets with gaso- plus all trips leaving the site over a block number)? line pumps have flourished given period of time. 2. Is that your home, work place, throughout the United States in • Primary trips:Trips from home, work, school,shopping place,or other? the past 10 years.The growing demand or school to the convenience market 3. Where are you going from here for self-service gasoline and conven- that return directly to point of origin. (street and block number)? fence grocery goods, readily accessible The trip's only purpose was shopping 4. Is that your home, work place, with fast service,have fueled a boom in at the convenience market. school,shopping place,or other? the convenience market business. As • Diverted linked trips:Trips in which the 5. Do you usually pass by this store? transportation engineers and planners, stop at the convenience market is part 6. Did you go out of your way to stop we are asked to determine the impacts of a sequence of two or more stops here today? of developments on the transportation within the total trip and where the stop Each interviewer had the discretionary system.Because the convenience mar- at the convenience market required a power to vary the language to suit his or ket is a relatively new concept and Gm- route diversion from the route that her individual communication skills.Be- ited data exist in the literature on the trip would otherwise be followed if the stop cause all interviewers were professional characteristics of these stores, we de- at the•convenience market were not transportation engineers and planners, cided to study the trip characteristics of made. the intent of the questions was well convenience markets with gas pumps in • Nondiverted linked trips: Trips in known, and throughout the progress of the Billings, Montana, area. The objec- which the stop at the convenience the study, the wording and approach to lives of the study were to market is part of a sequence of two or the interviews were adjusted to improve t 1. Define the trip generation character- more stops within the total trip and communication with those being inter- istics of convenience markets with where the driver was already traveling viewed. gas pumps. on the street on which the conven- The most critical problems observed 2. Analyze the trip characteristics of pa- ience market is located. were questions involving origins and Irons to these markets. destinations and interpreting whether the 3. Determine the trip assignment char- Methodology motorist really understood the concept ' acteristics for these markets by dis- of going out of your way. Frequently our tinguishing primary trips, diverted Local convenience markets with gas data indicated that the stated origins and • linked trips, and nondiverted linked pumps were plotted on a map to deter- destinations would require a completely trips. mine general site characteristics;the different route than what the motorist de- characteristics are listed in Table 1.Store scribed as on the way.Recognizing that Definitions managers or store headquarters were people do not necessarily follow the contacted for permission to survey their most logical routing because of acquired Certain terms used in this report are sites. Five sites on arterial streets were habits or for other reasons,the answers defined as follows: selected for the survey. At each site, to question number six were accepted • Convenience market with gas pumps: three people conducted the survey:one unless a significant route deviation was A store that sells convenience food person recorded all traffic movement in apparent and could not be explained. In items, gasoline products, and other and out of the site, and two interviewed that case, the interview response was car products and that is usually open customers. deleted from analysis. 15 to 16 hours per day. It has setf-ser- The interviewers were stationed near The total number of customers at the vice gas pumps and between 1400 the entrance of the building and at- five sites during the interviews was 639. and 2400 square feet of gross floor tempted to interview everyone entering Of that total, 461 customers, or 72%, area;one person manages the store. the store. Each interviewer had a data were interviewed, and only 25 re- • Trip: A single or one-direction vehicle form on which to record responses as sponses were deleted as being invalid. movement with either the origin or des- the questions were asked.A total of six Only 179 customers (28%) declined to tination inside the study site. questions were asked: be interviewed or were missed. The • Trip ends:The total of all trips entering 1. Where did you come from(street and committee considered the interview suc- I ITE JOURNAL/JULY 1987 43 1 cess ratio good in light of the quick-stop sections,and 14 were located at signal- Site Access Characteristics I nature of this type of store. ized intersections. At the five sites surveyed,40%to 50% Closeness to the interstate inter- of the trips entering the site entered frrrn Findings change was a factor for 25%of the listed the main street Where there is a nan- stores. Most stores were located on the Site Characteristics mountable median, it is obvious that ell major arterials intercepting the corn- these trips will be right-turn entrances. Based on information from the yellow muter traffic, with high trip generation A smaller percentage,20%to 40%,ex- pages of the Billings, Montana, tele- peaks corresponding to the commuter ited onto the main street.Twenty-five,1p3 phone directory,under"Grocers Retail," traffic.Eighty-eight percent of the stores 35%of the trips approached the site on and from field observations, we plotted were located in commercial areas.Only the minor street away from the arterial, 26 convenience markets with gas pumps three were isolated within a dominant and a similar percentage exited the site on a map. The dominant chain names residential district serving as a neigh- away from the main street.Sixty percent were: Superette, Express Mart, E-Z borhood grocery and commuter inter- to 80%of the site exits took place on the Shoppe, Kwik Way, Quik Mart, Super- ceptor.The average convenience market minor street.As the sites are small and America, and Speedy Mart. All stores in Billings has about 2,100 square feet of there is a high peak factor, situatioris were located along arterial streets. gross floor area and has eight gasoline with conflicts at the driveways, Twenty-one stores were located at inter- pumps. ems' � - lady with left-turn ingress and left-turn egress,can be very hazardous.The sit- Table 1.Site Characteristics nation was worse at sites with no access control (no curb, gutter, sidewalks) on Intersection the side street. Site Major Adjacent Street Minor Adjacent Street Control Trip Generation 1 Principal arterial Collector Signal Five lanes—no parking. Two lanes—parking both All of the surveyed sites had similar two ( center sides,two way layouts and a building size between left-turn lane) 1400 and 2400 square feet of gross floor 1984 AADT = 20,000 1984 AADT= 5,500 area(Table 2). 2 Principal arterial Local STOP control The following independent variables Four lanes—no parking, Two lanes—parking both on local were analyzed using linear regression to two way street determine their correlation (Table 3) to 1984 AADT= 22,000 1984 AADT = 1,500 the observed trip generation: 3 Principal arterial Local sTOP control • Gross square feet of building Six lanes with left-turn Two lanes—no parking on local • Number of gasoline pumps pockets in raised two way street • Total traffic adjacent to the site median,no parking, • Distance to the central business dis-' • two way 1984 AADT = 2,000 friCt(C1313) 1984 AADT - 25,000 Each of these variables proved tol 4 Principal arterial Local Signal have a poor correlation to trip generation' Six lanes with left-turn Two lanes—parking both (R = .22 to.09)except for the distance 1 pockets in raised sides,two way to the CBD that had a correlation coef- median,no parking, two media 1984 AADT = 2 00o ficient (R2) equal to 0.902, with the 1984 AADT = 28,000 higher trip generation being closer to the 1 5 Principal arterial Local Signal CBD. It is noted, however,that distance 1 • Four lanes with left-turn Two lanes—no parking to the CBD is not recommended for use pockets in raised in estimating trip generation,as this var- ; median,no parking, iable is not site related,and this specific two way correlation to trip generation would not I 1984 AADT = 13,500 apply to other cities. Traffic volume surveys were done dur- I Table 2.Trip Generation at Convenience Stores with Gas Pumps Distance Trip Generation Square Feet Number of from CBD ' Site Location 3 Hours Sum MDT of Building Gas Pumps (Feet) I 1 Broadwater-16th St.W. 345 25,500 2,400 6 12,900 I 2 Broadwater-1st St.W. 493 23,500 1,789 6 3,900 3 Main—Logan 200 27,000 2,100 6 16,200 4 Main—Milton 281 30,000 2,400 6 14,500 5 Ken's Interstate 206 13,500 1,357 10 12,500 ' I 44 ITE JO17RNAL/JULY 1987 I I I ing the morning,noon,and evening peak asked to estimate the percentage of their morning trip origins are home based, i hours for all five sites,and at one site a business done during the three peak and the majority of trip destinations are traffic count was conducted for the entire hours of an average day.They estimated to work. This is not surprising and re- 16 hours of operation on average week- that 25%of their business was done dur- fleets a large number of last-minute con- 1 days.To estimate average weekday trip ing those hours. The 16-hour traffic venience store stops in the morning 'on generation, the store managers were count was also analyzed, and it was the way to work. The origins and desti- found that 24% of the daily trips were nations during the noon hour were during the three peak hours for that evenly split between home and work Table 3.Correlation Factors count.Table 4 summarizes the average trips. One location near an interstate in- Distance to CBD = x trip generation rates that were found per terchange did show a large percentage y= a,x + a, site. (35%)of`other"origins,with the major- y = -0.0225 x+ 573.39 Figure 1 shows the results of the 16- ity of its noon destinations going to work R2 = 0.813 hour site traffic count.It is recommended (44%)and home(30%). R = 0.902 that trip generation for convenience mar- At all the surveyed locations but one, Square Feet of Building = x kets with gasoline pumps be estimated the evening trip purpose was the oppo- y = a,x + a, per site within the ra y = -0.0241 + 368.28 nge of 800 to 2,000 site of the morning trip purpose.The ma = 0 0088 vehicle trips per site on an average jority of the trips originated at work and R = 094 weekday taking into account the site lo- Sum ADDT= x cation, site characteristics, the adjacent Table 4.Average Trip Generation y= a,x + a, street characteristics, and traffic vol- per Site I y = 4.4926 x + 213.05 umes. R2 = 0.00486 Time Period Trip Ends Range ; R = 220 Origin/Destination Morning peak hour 95 42-146 ' Number of Pumps = x As part of the interviews with cus- Noon y= 410.98 x — 12.42 tourers,data were collected on thepeak hour 96 57-165 R2 = 0.0387 pur- Evening peak hour 130 86-209 pose of the other ends of the conven- Weekday 1,300 800-2,000 _ 196 R - fence market trips. The majorityof Based on five P surveyed sites in Billings,Montana 4* Don't pull your hair out . . . We have the motors that you need! II to _.....t * /* , ' ,(;..... i 1�; . ; E,, ram, �,;, +4 To Fd: -��� A a Eagle Signal �� • Marbelite ' Crouse-Hinds Kenton i -_t, Econolite/GE ';;�. !9 ti Automatic Signal r?.; �'. = ' • Motors to fit your every need. ' • Quick service . . . low, low prices! • Motors for dial units, camshafts, flashers, coordinators and synchrolizers. o GENERAL TRAFFIC EQUIPMENT CORP. l 218 Willow Street • Yonkers, NY 10701 • (914)965-9292 ©_• Ask about our other fine traffic control products! 1 ITE jom riaL/JULY L4a7 45 II ended at home. At the location that did originate within one mile of the conven- large extent, on existing traffic on the not have a majority of evening trip des- ience market.As would be expected,the street system and do not generate traffic_ tinations terminating at home, the site location at the interstate interchange at- Our study found that, in fact,over 60% location was along a major suburban ar- traded much longer trips than the down- of the trips were nondiverted linked trips. terial with other shopping/services land town or suburban locations. Diverted linked trips accounted for an, uses nearby. The majority of trip desti- other 25%to 30%,and primary trips ac nations from this site(60%)fell into the Trip Type counted for only 10%to 15%, on aver- "other"category. The determination of trip type was one age. The trip type percentages were of the primary objectives of our study.By fairly constant over the three peak hours' Trip Range identifying the trip type(i.e., primary,di- of the day studied.Table 5 presents the The range of the trips to and from the vented link,or nondiverted link)we could average trip type percentages for thei, convenience market was plotted for each estimate the impact of convenience mar- three peak hours. site.The two scales used to plot range kets with gas pumps on the transporta- were miles and minutes.The ranges se- tion system.The same interview method lected for plotting were 0.5, 1, and 2 had been used to study trip type at re- miles; Conclusions and 2,4,and 6 minutes.Analysis gional shopping centers.' These data This report presents the findings of a of the range data indicates that 50%to were of interest to the committee for use study of trip characteristics of convert-I 60%of trips are less than 2 miles or 6 in quantifying claims that convenience fence markets with gas pumps in Bill- minutes. Also, a large number of trips markets draw entirely, or at least to a ings, Montana. The findings presented; should be used with judgment. Billings has 110,000 persons in the metropolitan Table 5.Trip Type:Summary of 5 Sites area, which is characterized by urban Percentage of Total Traffic sprawl and a heavily car-oriented corn- Morning Peak Noon Evening Peak • munity.Trip characteristics may be quite different in larger cities where more pub- 1 Trip Type Average Range Average Range Average Range lic transportation is available and where ; Primary 6 0-10 13 9-17 13 5-21 more pedestrian traffic occurs. Also, i Diverted linked 30 12-38 25 14-33 25 9-34 convenience markets in Montana are al- Nondiverted linked 64 58-85 62 50-70 62 55-83 lowed to sell beer and wine. Trip char- acteristics may be different where laws 111 restrict the sale of alcoholic beverages, FIGURE 1. Site Traffic Generation or where convenience markets do not 16-hour convenience market with gas pumps have gasoline pumps. 120_ 110- References 1. Slade,Louis J.,and Gorove,Frederick E."Re- ductions in Estimates of Traffic Is, of Regional Shopping Centers."ITE Journal Vol.51,No.1,Jan- D 100- uary 1981,pp.16-18. 0 o 1 Z < 90— 1 z LL80 - The data contained in this report reflect the findings and views of the Montana cr Technical Committee. The contents do F 70- not have the approval of, nor are they anecessarily the views of,the Intennoun- i— 60— lain Section, the Institute of Transporta- tion Engineers Technical Council,or the - institute of Transportation Engineers In- so temational Board of Direction. Members of the Montana Technical 4o - Committee of the Intermountain Section of ITE who participated in this project 1 i , i i 1 i 1 i t i i i i I 1 are: Robert Marvin, chairman; Leon 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Howe; Ken Behling;James Fells; Gary HOUR ENDING Huttmann; Richard Jacobson; Pierre Jomini;Chad Lutey;H. Terry Smith;and Figure 1. Site traffic generation:16-hour convenience market with gas pumps. Pat Vandell. 46 ITE JOURNAL/JULY 1987 . ' I - - . JAN oe '91 17:25 pOBERt H LEE a ASSOC . P.1 POtt-Ir brand Fax Transmittal Memo 7672 No.ot Pages 1 .Today's Date/le giy Time " A>t;//' ' ' . 1/ 71 A.71.C:P- --- " *".. ...--. 6°1',.",i1.1v.-0/. .k a v'. . 7 . . . , . . . I , . „. . :Comparty — Company 0 I ev..71-, , 6e...., • A — ,5c.,c.... C;J4 7 Q-(.,. Relet-41,1. . . . _. ., . Lo„tioR . k•• ..7.. .. .. .:,,.,47.1‘....t. Location . 'Fax 4n I 1 eAt Li-e--e- " ,--if6 Dept,Charge —70 z., , Fax .; 5 _ . .57 y'' :Telephne# .Ti;leptone; -74. - 4%-'36 ' 74i-6- cl17-4 7 7. 'Comments originel Destroy 0 Return Ej Ceti for pickup I Dsposition: ,,.... .. . . . g75: 7-1(4 4,? . ,Lea.', 4.1,e.,vv.;1-4-.--.., . pk.P-e7). ..wf' , ea -sal 6tver,,,,I. . td. 47*. , . PLANNING DIVISION . CITY OF RENTON 1 JAN 0 9 1991 ECEINED '1! . , _ . .. . /0,. _44._ rirk4v,6-1.-.'„ ! , . , z-1‘ czve Z-w re- Ze:.7--a/7.-14,rd 14e- -11,---ogibk& ----- -------11:2_ ----- • ' ' , eev'S k_____ : ....._.,,_ _ ea_.______e_e_ftz e5 /Teal: 1 4.4.44/ ,44 .t"eff 1 Dez___e_i;kil-,,ez,-- ez-I,, 1,1 . --, Agve.,- ' ../..,'.1--L_ 71-_(2--e-K--c---kk-i4_y,i______. .„ J., el: 14,/,_d_____J'ailzr_Id,/./...-.7.. ,:e_ce_i____4,4iF __I re-A,e.,,„ [ . . .. . 1 1 LRO RT H. LEE s� ASSOcATES, INC. ARCHITECTURE PLANNING ENGINEERING 1520 140th AVE.N.E. • SUITE 200 • BELLEVUE,WA 99006 • [209]746-4677 1 I JOHN W.JOHNBON Architect December 21, 1990 Mr. Mark R. Pywell, AICP PLANMNGDMisION Project Manager MTV OF RE]TON I City of Renton 1 200 Mill Ave South DEC 3 1 1990 Renton, WA 98055 Dear Mr. Pywell, Thank You for the prompt transmitting the request for information from the Technical Advisory Committee regarding auto trip generation by our proposed Chevron Fueling Facility and Retail Store. We will contract with an Engineering firm specializing in Transportation Engineering to answer the question related to estimated trip generation. in negotiating a contract for engineering services, we need to know two things. A. Is credit given, in determining potential mitigation amounts, for the traffic generated by the existing Auto service and Fueling facility? This is critical in knowing how much analysis of existing traffic generation we need to include in the contract for services. There must be some remodel or change of use proposal, for an existing structure, previously reviewed that provides precedent. B. Are there copies of the Ordinance adopting the Transportation Benefit Zone for Grady Way that would help us understand the traffic impact analysis that the City does and the information the City needs to complete its analysis. I understand that our project can not move to review by the SEPA Review Committee until this additional information is provided. ' Sincerely, ROBERT H LEE & ASSOC. , INC. f AX Mark Cross / cc. Jay Hummel, Engineer, Chevron USA INC. 8702\trafimp.ltr t% CITY )F RENTON ')` Department of.Planning/Building/Public Works Earl Clymer, Mayor Lynn Guttmann, Administrator • December 21, 1990 Mark Cross Robert H. Lee&Assoc., Inc. 1520 140th Ave. N.E., Ste. 200 Bellevue,WA 98005 SUBJECT: Chevron USA Fueling Facility ECF; CU-096-90 Dear Mr. Cross: The above referenced project has been reviewed by the Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) for the City of Renton. The TAC noted that the project is located within a Transportation Benefit Zone (TBZ). Prior to presenting this project to the Environmental Review Committee the following information needs to be provided. Submit a traffic count comparing the vehicle trips per day and peak hour for the proposed project (estimate) and the existing project. This information will need to be provided and stamped by a registered civil engineer. • This information is needed in order to allow the City to determine if a TBZ fee needs to be assessed on the project. As noted above,this project will be on hold until the requested information is provided to the satisfaction of the Transportation Systems Division and the Development Planning Section of the City of Renton. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact me at 235-2550. Sincerely, Mark R. Pywe IZ CP Project Manager TBZLTR 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 1 , . , f.„ I:;• 1 1 ••••••••••••••••••••••••:••••:•,:••••:••••••••••••••••:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::,::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::•:::::•:•!..:•:•:•:•:.•:•:.•:•:•:•:••.•:::::•:.•:•:•:•:•:•:•:::::•:•:•:::•:•:::•.•:•....::••:.:.:.-.:.•.:.:.,.: :.:.:.:•:•:;..;.:.;::::.::::.::::::::•:••..:.:••.::•:••:::.....-:-...-.•:•:••.•:::••.•:•:....:::.•:::::.:::::.:•:::::.:::::..i.:::•::::::::::::.:i.:::•g::::: •••••::::n.::::::•:::M:g:::::iii :D EPAIlTNI,E NraFV•VAN N1 NG:/•:.E3 k.1.114D.INO/P:lj13.LICA11/0.11KS.:::::M.::::::::.:::::::::•::::•::::::::::::::.::.,:.i:.•:::: ! . ....::::::.':::::::::••::::':::••::::.:-::•::•::k:::M.::::ft: ;:•::::gai:•::::MET:ECHN ICAL,ADVISORT:e OM M ITT E E.::::::::X:0:::::&•••:•:::::::::::::::: ::::•::::::.R......*:.: ::::::g.:Rig::: I, .........."""""."""•"""•""""""•""".".•.......".••••".:•"••••.•••••••••••••••....•.:""".... " • "" "- ••••••••:::::::::::::••••••••••••••••••••••••.•:•:•:•,...::::.::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::.:•:.:::::.:::::: : ::.::::::::.:•::::::::::::::::::: ::::.::::::igg::::::.::::::::::•::.$::.':::•:0:::::::::1:a::iNii:: ::g.M.: : ::.M::.::::•:M.....M.:••• ••••:::.::::•..STAFFIlEp:ORT....R::.:.:::.::.:.:::.::.:.:::.::.::.::.*:.:K::.::.::.::.:::i:.::...*:.*...::.::.:::.:.*:.::.::.:::.:.:-...).*:.::.::.::::::::::::::::::::*:.5.*:.:x*:.::.*:.: :::::::.:::::::::::::::*.:::.:.:*:.:::::,:::::.:::::::::::::::::::::::::.:i.::::.::::::::: ::::::::::::::„. •••....-::::::::::::.::::::::::. .....::::::::: :::::::::::::.::::::::::::::.::::.:.:.....:....;:::::;.::::.;........::::::::::::::::::;.•••:.s.:::-.•••-•.;::::::::::::::::::::::::-...:::::::::::.....:::::.......:•:;•:-....:::.....:::•:::::::::i.M..edidiji bet..........2V.4990:.::.::.::.::.f..:•••::::::.:.......:....::.:•:::::..:::.:.::„.::::..::„::.::.::.::..::.:::::::::::.::.......::„::.:.:.::.::.::.:.:.::.::.:.:.:.:.:.:.:....:....::..::.:......:..,..:.::::.:.:.:.:::..r....:.:.:•:.:.:.:....:„..:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:::..:.:.:•„ •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••.................................................,...,............................................................................................. '1 1 ..-.:::....:.::,..:::::::::::::.,:.•••••.:.:,,,,,........,,,,,••••••,. ........ ......:•:•:•:•:•:•:::.....::::::::::::::::•,..::::::.::::::::::::::::.::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::.:....:::;:.:.:::.::::::::::::::::::::::::::,:.:.:.:.:::.:::::::::•,::::::::::.:•::•::::::::::::::::::::::::;:::: :::,:::;:nii::::::::: :::::::::: :::::::.::i:•:::::::::::::::::::•:::i.:: APOPACPI12.PN9......;iiiil.::::.iiiiiiiiii:aii:::6:::::•:Pli•I:::::::::::iPiqi:•••iPik.l. iii::igigiii:g'R:IPPRiiinNiailniniiigin:::gi.:.iliiig.: 1:.iili.:,! :1 MP.)40AN...V:m.::::maainimin:::::?;:....mph01(7,4.:1,1sk.:::::::::aii.a.........::.....m.. ..:0:: :::::::::.,:mii...::.:.....:-..ig........:a..................... ...i..m.....?:::::::::: :...m...i.„:...:, :::.::::::::::::::::.:,:.:::.:.:::„....:i:i.....*:.::::.::: :::::::xi:::::::::::.::::......K:::::: :::::::::.:...::::::::::::::: :;..........:„........i.:. •:.... :::;....ig......:::::::::::.PROJECn::::::::;:::.M:::::.Ni:.iii::::::g.: ::::::::: :::M.M.:::;....iii::B.:....iiiiiiif..Llettnd.:.F4j1jtNi:.4:.Ra011::.:.P1Og...:.:.:g.,::::...::::....:::•gimg::.:•0:.:.:::::::::::mine::::::::: ,'1 •••••••••••••••••• •• • •.••• . • •••••............................................................,..........................,......,...............................,........,........................,.............„................,............................, .:::::::::::::•: :::4-•. :............. ......::•ag........:... ...:M.:::••• ••.n.: •••..::•.is........:,1•••::,.::::•::::•::•••:::•.,::•::•,........:::::::::••• ••...........i.ins:•• •••••....::•••:::••••L•:•••••.:::,•::::•••••••••,......•••:•••: .....:•::•••••••••••••._.:•:••••.',...:•::::t••••••••••L•:::::::iii...:::::.E:::::•.•:•:::::••.m.::::::•0•:::•:•;•:....mo.....:::::::::•:•:•:ii:g...:•..::.H::::::::::•::::::.::::::::•...,•::::::::u:z ENVIRONMENTAL:CHEUKILIP;::::::0::: :MEQ.177',.......Q0:09.6;-90riMf.....:::::::::a:ii::::: :.*::::::.::::::.::.:i*i:i.....*i*.:*:.*:.*:.:::•:.*:.::.:i*:.*:::.*:::::::::::::.:*.::::.:*:.:x::::. ••••••••••••••••••••••••••• ••••••••• "••••••••••••••••••••••••••••...........................•—••••••••••••••••••••••••:.......................,.........••••••:•:........••••••••:........,:.:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::.::::&*?......i:i:::::::::::::::::::::::;:;:;::::. 1 •.:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::•,..::::::::::::::::•.*::::::•::::::::::::.:::::•: :::.:.,.., ::::::::::::::.:...........::::::::: :::.:•::::::::::::::::::::::: :::::::::::::•:::::im::::::1:.::::.:::::•::::•::::::::.:::.:::.::::•:::•:•:.:.::::= : ::.:•:::::•:::: :::•:::::;:::::::.i:::::::: :: : : ::02::::.::::::; : , ::::::::•::::::.:0:::::::::::DE$O FI I PT:I 0 N.:0 F.:::P ROPOSALl'.*:::::::::::::::::::.*::*:::::::::::::::.A0ifilibaht.).: :00.1 :..4:g$:....r.4d.OV.elcop.......Arti..ex.ipt:!.9.4...§9.m.qpi:§tptign:ii 8ipi.:::::o::4!o: iii,:gflifai::t6:6aiat16:6:T66ij,:,ok:*::*fi $.p::::..Oti]:::: ":•":::::::::::::::::":::::::::::.":::1:::.':::ii"::::::::".::::"""""::::: :::Mga::::::::: :;M:: ::::::M00: :: :.616.6 :1'66...::gf:::iiiiiiiV 6186:::.:.:164i.iiif64(itii3440. :s.i.iii.61::fiii60.i 1 .!...::.:....:::..:...:.,:...,::.:....:.......:.........:....,,,...:.,:::::.............:.:::::::.::::::::::::::::.,:::::::::,„:,:::::,:„,:,:::::::::,,,:,:,:,:,:::::,,:,:,:,:,:,:,:,...:„„ . npw.:12;p.Op:b011tiKt(10:1:.4a(lk$'4,:::: ::ni::.*:.::.::.:::::::::::::u:::::::::::::::.::::::iNii::::::.:::. ,I ....••••••••••••:''''''....:::"",.:.:....:.:',..:.:.:.:...::.........:::::::.:::::,......:-.*:::-:::::.::::':::::::::::::.:::-:....::::.::::?:-::::ii*:.**::::::::: :*::,::mi:.*.::::::::::::::::: ::.:.:: *::::i:::: :::::::::,:i:i:i::: ::::.: ::*:,:i:i*:.::::: ::.*:,:i*:.::.::::: :::.:::::::::::::::,.:::::,:::,:::::::::.:::::::.::::..... 1 tocktroab :0140POsAug.: ::::::: ::a. : :x.. ..t.:aoit:isouth....::qtadst...vv.Apo.....imoiiii...iiii.:0....:0::::::::::.::.:i*:.*:.::.::.::.::.::.::.:::.:iini ::.::.::.:i.....0..... , ! 1 ! J /( I _____ —7 S.7th ST. 1 •V• . • ! . , ! ! ' As,Ntl ailiJ ej-65;b'''6cit<'"e 41-. I I ..._ , • EL-..)&;_--Lon 1. . I ,.. , 1 ) ...0 6-----g 0-=-=-8 b=--.9 " i iI , .._ 1);r 0 I Li;ceArt.p_j I *// N------'‘—__ . S.Renton Villa .PL ..-..- ' r I i II . i 1 1--------"- NORM AI°1"444k W !! '1 ! ! ! NEIGHBORHOOD DETAIL MAP 1 i. SCALE: 1..200.-0- I 1 I I r r ! 1 I I I • Technical Advisory Committee Staff Report Chevron Fueling Facility&Retail Building December 21, 1990 Page 2 • • • BACKGROUND This project was first considered by the Technical Advisory Committee on September 21, 1990. The proposed project was continued without consideration when it was noted that the project area was subject to flooding and it appeared that the Fire Code would prohibited 12,000 gallon underground fuel storage tanks in this area. Fire Prevention, Utility Services Division and Planning staff researched this issue and determined that the are of the project site where the underground fuel tanks a e to be located was outside of the flood zone as shown on the FEMA flood maps and that the underground fuel storage tanks.could be allowed as long as the tanks were adequately anchored in place. LAND USE 1. Whether the proposed project is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan zoning designation i and with Goals, Policies and Objectives set forth in the Plan? • The proposed service station is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan Map which designates the project site for Commercial uses, and with Comprehensive Plan elements for commercial uses. The proposed project is also consistent with Plan Elements for the Central Plan area. • 2. Whether the proposed project is consistent with the land use map zoning designation and applicable Zoning Ordinance components? The subject property is zoned for Business District use,which permits the proposed service station providing a'conditional use permit is approved. The proposed project adequately addresses development standards for commercial uses (4-31-10). • 3. Whether.the proposed development is consistent with the Zoning Ordinance and other applicable regulations/standards? The properties to the east,west and south are zoned for Business District use,the properties to the north of the project site are zoned for Light Industrial use. 1. 4. Whether the proposed development is compatible with vicinity land uses. To the west of the project site is a hotel, to the south and east are office buildings and retail stores and to the north are auto dealerships. The proposed use is compatible with the surrounding land uses. ELEMENTS ENVIRONMENTAL • 1. Whether the applicant has adequately identified and addressed the following environmental impacts likely to occurin conjunction with the proposed development. a. Aesthetics/Land Use • • Impacts: The proposed development includes demolition of the existing building which includes service bays, construction of a new 1250 s.f. building without service bays, construction of a 176 s.f. utility building/restrooms and replacement of three 12,000 gallon underground fuel tanks. A 45 X 92 foot canopy will cover the main building and the four fueling stations. Two standard parking spaces and one handicapped parking space will be provided on site in accordance with the Municipal Code. A six foot wide sidewalk and a minimum ten foot wide landscape strip will be installed along South Grady Way as is required by Code. In addition to the Code requirement, the applicant will also be providing a landscape strip along'the south boundary of the project site. t. Technical Advisory Committee Staff Report • Chevron Fueling Facility&Retail Building December 21, 1990 Page 3 that the majority of the landscape area along The plans submitted by the applicant indicate a j y p Grady Way will be covered by turf. Staff feels that the majority of the area should be , landscaped with shrubs and flowers. The applicant has not indicated any landscaping along the east and west boundaries of the property which would improve the aesthetics of the site and define the east and west ingress/egress of the project site. Staff recommends that the applicant submit a modified landscape plan for the project site which includes a minimum of five foot wide planters along the east and west boundaries, enhanced plantings along S. Grady Way and a sidewalk along S. Grady Way. Mitigation Measures: See Recommendation#. Policy Nexus: Environmental Review Ordinance 4-6, Landscape Ordinance 4-31-34 b. Natural Environment Impacts: The existing site is entirely covered in asphalt, concrete and building. In the construction of the new project, the applicant will be providing new landscaped areas. The applicant has also indicated that the site will no longer provide an area for repairing of automobiles. This should reduce some of the contaminates (e.g., oil) from collecting on the site and washing into the storm drains. The applicant will be installing oil/water separators to ensure that oil does not get into the storm drains. If during the excavation of the existing underground steel storage tanks contaminated soils are found,the applicant will need to stop construction activities immediately and to submit a soils remediation plan to the Fire Prevention Bureau and the Development Planning Section of the Department of Planning/Building/Public Works within one week of discovering the contamination. Construction will not proceed until the remediation plan II has been accepted by City staff. • Mitigation Measures: See Recommendation#. Policy Nexus: Environmental Review Ordinance 4-6, Underground Storage Tank Secondary Containment Ordinance 7-2 c. Traffic Impacts: Construction activities, including the excavation of the underground steel storage tanks and the remodeling of the existing service station, could generate traffic which would impact area roadways during peak hour traffic. Based on the fact that S. Grady Way is a Major Arterial, measures will be required (limiting hauling operations to the hours between 8:30 A.M. and 3:30 P.M.) to mitigate traffic impacts from Hauling activities on area roadways. Mitigation Measures: See Recommendation# Policy Nexus: Community Facility Goals/Comprehensive Plan 1 d. Noise, Light and Glare Impacts: 1) Construction: Noise, light and glare are anticipated In conjunction with construction activities. Some mitigation of these Impacts will be achieved through restrictions on hauling hours and construction activities. No additional mitigation measures will be required as the site is surrounded mainly by office and light Industrial uses. 2) Operations: The existing ser vice bays will not be included in the new service station. Noise generated by the repairing of vehicles will be eliminated. New lights will be installed as part of this project. The plans indicate that the lights are designed to retain glare on the project site. The Police Department has recommended that non-reflective glass be used throughout the project to reduce the potential for glare. I'� Technical Advisory Committee Staff Report Chevron Fueling Facility&Retail Building December 21, 1990 Page 4 • Mitigation Measures: See Recommendation#. Policy Nexus: Commercial Policies/Comprehensive Plan. e. Public Services 1) Police and Fire Service Impacts: Police and Fire Prevention Bureau staff report adequate resources to • provide anticipated services to the site during construction activities and operations with system improvement fees and with Code-required improvements. The Fire Prevention Bureau staff has Indicated that the project will be required to comply with U.F.C. and Ordinance 4144 regarding the installation of new underground storage tanks. Mitigation Measures: None required. Policy Nexus: Environmental Review Ordinance 4-6, Ordinance 4144 2) Storm Water • Impacts: The majority of the project site will be covered by Impervious materials after the completion of construction on the project site. The Storm Water Section of Planning/Building/Public Works has indicated the 'project must meet the requirements of the 1990 King County Surface Water Design Manual. Mitigation Measures: None required. Policy Nexus: Environmental Review Ordinance 4-6 f. Construction Impacts: Improvements to the site and off-site are required in conjunction with the development of the service station which will generate noise, dust, debris and traffic. Standard construction 1 mitigation measures should adequately address these impacts. Mitigation Measures: See Recommendation# • Policy Nexus: Policies Element/Comprehensive Plan . .S�:. f a... : >::T[5...toh...::E�!G:issue;a'::L�.eter.rn.:::a::o. Q.:::::pi? :::.9;. .::..::..::::::: < .�� : ::>::.�tEC .MM�NDA7I.Q.NS ;> :> :.:. ae:.................:.�:..::..::..::..::..::..............:..::::::•::::::::::.................:.� ....: :.:;•:•:•:::•:::.::::::::> < .......................... ........................... t .......th.::co............................................ 1. The applicant shall provide an agreement ensuring that:a) complete soils testing will be conducted in accordance with the City of Renton and the State Department of Ecology standards; b) if during construction of these facilities contaminated soils are found, all construction will cease ,! immediately; c) within one week of discovering the contaminated soils, the applicant shall submit copies of a soils remediation plan to the satisfaction of the Fire Prevention Bureau and the Department of Planning/Building/Public Works prior to the resumption of any work on the site; d) State Department of Ecology approval will be required for remediation activities; and e) that all commercial and industrial activities within 300 feet of the project site are notified of the soils remediation plan and provided with a schedule of events. The agreement shall be submitted to the • satisfaction of the Department of Planning/Building/Public Works prior to the issuance of any site preparation/building permits for this project. 2. The applicant, in order to mitigate construction-related Impacts (e.g., noise, dust, traffic) shall submit a construction management plan including the following; a) an erosion control element; b) an element for the periodic watering of any disturbed soil on the site to reduce dust; c) an element for the limiting of hauling operations to the hours between 8:30 A.M. and 3:30 P.M.; d) an element for the protection of the existing storm drains from soils on site disturbed by construction activities; and e) a$2,000.00 cash deposit for street cleaning. This plan shall be submitted to the satisfaction !i . of the Department of Planning/Building/Public Works prior to the issuance of site ;I preparation/building permits and implemented throughout the construction phase of this project. • • • Technical Advisory Committee Staff Report Chevron Fueling Facility&Retail Building December 21, 1990 Page 5 3. The applicant shall submit an amended landscaping plan which shows landscape planting beds (minimum five feet in width) along the east and west property boundaries and an enhanced landscaping plan along S. Grady Way to the satisfaction of the Development Planning Section prior to the public hearing before the Hearing Examiner. Note: • A. The applicant will need to apply for permits from the Fire Prevention Bureau for the removal of the existing underground storage tanks and the installation of the new tanks. B. The applicant will need to submit a sign plan for any new signs for the proposed development. C. The applicant will need for provide storm drainage in accordance with the King County Surface Water Design Manual to the satisfaction of the Utility Services Division of the Department of Planning/Building/Public Works. ::>: :�: ::: :� :. ENTS:::4.F::REV:LEWINQ<D.SPAR:TNIE...............:.::::::::::::::::.::.::...... ......:::.:.:.:..:.::.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:...:::.:.:.:.:.: ::.D.,:..�:::.CCU.IV1M..............................:.::::::::::::::::::.............................::::.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.::.:.:.:.:.:.....................................:.......:._.:-:::::,:::::::::::::.:_...._..................................::::::::::::: EMNiiMiiiiMEMi M.:d< 1/ nous.Cit. ::de .artment ve r s:h� evtewedandcommentauponaep>:•:lec. >:.:> >:..: > n e ..:�;:<.::.»:•:::•;:•;:•::•::<•::•::•: Il w :f o LAND USE Police Department: Approved. All glass is to be non-reflective. Fire Prevention-Bureau: , , Approved with standard conditions. Installation of new UST's to comply with UFC&Ordinance 4144. Storm Water: The project must meet the requirements of the 1990 King • County Surface Water Design Manual. The applicant to • furnish storm drainage analysis and calculations for the site. Water Utilities: One new fire hydrant will need to be installed on the south side of Grady Way to meet Fire Dept. required fire flow. Sewer Utilities: Installation of side sewer to new building location will have to meet current City of Renton codes. • Parks and Recreation: Approved. See environmental comments. Construction: Approved. Development Planning: Must comply with following codes: CU, parking, landscaping, grade&fill, storm,fire, building. Long Range Planning: Approved subject to provision of mitigation measures for potential fire and explosion hazards, to the satisfaction of Fire Dept. �I ENVIRONMENTAL Police Department: Project not expected to have significant impact as it is II replacing an existing operation. �I Fire Prevention Bureau: Required to comply with UFC & City Ordinance 4144 (UST regulations). Storm Water: Minor impact to existing storm drainage system. Water Utilities: Minor impact to the existing water system. Sewer Utilities: No impact on the existing sanitary sewer system. 1 f , Technical Advisory Committee Staff Report Chevron Fueling Facility&Retail Building December 21, 1990 Page 6 Parks and Recreation: Recommend the proponent review the Proposed Trails Master Plan and future pedestrian access connection to Renton Village Shopping Center. Construction: Probable minor impact. Development Planning: 1) Landscaping should be thematically Integrated with Center; 2) Check on-site parking re: code requirements; 3) Check nonexclusive parking - cannot be used to meet parking requirements-also it appears to be in a roadway; 4) Check with traffic on volume impacts; access points seem quite close to the street - will there be queueing onto Grady; 5) I wonder about safety & aesthetics from outdoor lavatories; 6) will excavation require PSAPCA permits?; 7) Is soils study necessary re: tank removal; and 8) What about storm drainage/flooding -water table is high here. Long Range Planning: The proposed land use is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. However, the proposed project may create environmental health hazards, such as fire and explosion. Adequate mitigation measures should be required. I' i. ............... ... .:.:. .:........ : .:. ... ..:.... .. .. . . mmi ee::: ::: ::> > :: ::: :: :::::::: :::::::: :: : •. :Techn;<ca[:Adv�so..: .::C...:::::::. : .::.::::::::::.::::::::. .:...:...�.�:.:::.:.�:.�::::::.�.�:.� : . .TICS: :: > :: ><N December 21, 1990 • To: Gregg Zimmerman Rubin Yu Glen Gotti Sam Chastain Penny Bryant • Jim Hanson c.-- Fro Don Erickson, Chairman :. •:: ::::::.:::: :::. • er 21 i1:990:: : :s :: ::: : : ::: ::: :: :•> ::: : :: :� ::: : :: : : : :Meetiri .::T7at..::>::>::::::.::>::::::D.ecembe.:..... . ....... ........K*-:::::::: :..... * ::::............. .,E::.�:.�:. :::. :..::.'. :.':.� :. . :. : .:.::,...::... AM::::::>::::::>:::::::::::::::>:::: ::::::<.>..>.:::: ::::::»>::::::<:>:<:;.....i i...>: ::>::>:::::: <::>:::;:>:•::•::'::•::':•::.:>:•::'>::.>: :•:;';:::•:•:<•;:• ':':•:•: 0.om::::>:: :::::::::::::::::>':::>: :: ::>:::::::>::::::::::: : ,,,,:::::::: :::>:::: ;;: :::::...,„:::: • ca.,-..*:::>:<:::»::>:: :<:;::>:::: Third<:Fl.00r.:::Conference::Roo..:.:::::::. :::::::::::..:::::::........::::. .:.:. . .. .. . :.:.:..::::. ::..:::::. :. ::: Agenda is listed below. TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE AGENDA DECEMBER 21, 1990 Third Floor Conference Room Commencing at 8:30.AM • TIME/KEY PARTICIPANTS NEW PROJECTS • CHEVRON USA, INC. CU;ECF-096-90 Applicant seeks to redevelop an existing service station on a 24,295 sf lot. Construction includes an 11,000 sf bldg, four fuel dispensers, and three new 12,000 gallon fuel tanks. The project is located at 301 South Grady Way. 4- i r , jr':• P.' • • • • ��. • is �r /� •i [, 1• .t• : '.,,..:Zil *,• •. :,..• ,..,.;i•;•.•• ••••••;.•••••••:,....',,:,••:,•••:•:•.:1:1. :....'• :.•:#1,"•••,::::•,..',..:.*•1•:•.•••••••:••'.,:•....•:.'••••:••• 1yy .Y.... ,....ii44.•:: • ..;... • ii • .T 'tn' ��y p .. ? I' r-f�.�'r 'L V:� r•, i �•,•. c;y�• r ';�' ;Y: .f ',Yil,:'' : it • • `, f,'. gt•. "a„: Yid alARROB_AT H. LEE & ASSOC.ATES, INC. CHITECTURE PLANNING ENGINEERING 16EO 140th AVE.N.E. • SUITE E00 • BELLEVUE,WA 98006 • [E06]746-4677 JOHN W.JOHNSON Architect December 20, 1990 PLANNING Cr CITY of Rtiv a Mr. Mark R. Pywell, AICP Project Manager DEC 2 6 Tc� City of Renton 200 Mill Ave South ""eEl Renton, WA. 98055 Dear Mr. Pywell, Attached is a colored site plan of our proposed Chevron Fueling Facility and Convenience Store at 301 South Grady Way. I hope that the color application meets the requirements. If there is any problem, please return with a note as to the problem. In our last discussion, there was some question about the amount of retail space. The outside dimensions of the building are 25'-2" by 50 ' . The internal retail space, minus bathrooms,storage and coolers is 1, 150 to 1200 square feet. The interior layout of the building is shown on the site plan. I will be out of town next week, so if you need anything from us, please ask to speak to our lead architect, Mr. Steve Kattner. He lives in Renton and can drop off anything you need. Assuming the roads become passable again. Sincerely, ROBERT H LEE & ASSOC. , INC. 41, Mark Cross, Senior Planner • 8702\COLORSP It- 0 DEC 20 '90 11:40 ROBERT H LEE & ASSOC F'@_!?N1P4 OEV OON9 , TELECOPY/FACSIMILE COVER PAGE OETYO Fw,,74,'P Number of pages (including cover): DEC 2 0 1090 From: ROBERT H. LEE & ASSOCIATES, INC.I3 ARCHITECTURE PLANNING ENGINEERING 1520 14oth AVE.N.Q. * 5UITh 200 • eE1.1.gVUE,WA125005 • /20 722.4577 FAX do (206) 746-6836 Date: l 21 q� To: / [etc ,r ,-, 4-- A 4 ,:::, - _,/,--7 1 _ , .767 Z. �. 1 ilav/k -i- 0 /; _ .. Re7 . lv l . l c if lam- . A e r 5 e'er j-1 7 rl i 6 L..- ,-/ L ,,t (L/C lLe .L.-- � ,-- v .- -i , r�-� // -- -7--i 7i..,,e_-:. f/e.. s -76> 5‘,P.4 : c' y- t 41 _k ,. `� mac'- C i . 3 6—.- `_ Ci ivier,__.:7k,--e_tv„. r r7-r ,. L / , 7 X 4- 5 _ � 4vf , �?-�-z .57 , ,I amp .. _.*. ___c_ ' -- 2 cCW G7,. 7i.- - - 5./ LL_.!/ r 7._ 5' . e � / 5 pl. LC?, _..._ l c9 s it- _. ____ ArAt _ ___.. iIP YOU DO NOT RECEIVE ALL PAGESI PLEASE CALL IMMEDIATELY. F O RFC NOTICE o Ci © z 9•0 b• 09gTep SEPlek."- OF PENDING APPLICATION DESCRIPTION : CHEVRON FUELING FACILITY& RETAIL BLDG CU;ECF-096-90 TO REDEVELOP AN EXISTING SERVICE STATION ON A 24,295 SF LOT. CONSTRUCTION INCLUDES A 11,000 SF BLDG, FOUR FUEL DISPENSERS, AND THREE NEW 12,000 GALLON FUEL TANKS. GENERAL LOCATION AND/OR ADDRESS: 301 SOUTH GRADY WAY PUBLIC APPROVALS REQUIRED : III ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW BUILDING PERMIT PUBLIC COMMENTS WILL BE RECEIVED BY THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT .ANYTIME PRIOR . TO PUBLIC HEARINGS AND. DURING PUBLIC HEARINGS. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CALL THE CITY OF RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT 235-2550 I'I THIS NOTICE NOT TO BE REMOVED WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION !_ I • CERTIFICATION I I , N,a'.1�.c,. Save , HEREBY CERTIFY THAT 3 COPIES OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENT WERE POSTED BY ME IN CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON OR NEARBY THE DESCRIBED PROPERTY ON i � —,�— ya • • ATTEST: Subscr'bed and sworn to before me, a 01151signiiskr Notary Public in and for the State of Washing �t4 c ET J pp*DO,* residing • ` Q,G• e 4 on the s►oN t • �j,� day of ��/�(0 o"4:.�er�s may, `i /i/ i/ chi NOTARY 0 2.1 '. PUBLIC 1. A V OF R4, /1/ C ° ) 09grep SEP E�e OF PENDING APPLICATION DESCRIPTION : . CHEVRON FUELING FACILITY & RETAIL BLDG CU.;ECF-096-90 . TO REDEVELOP AN EXISTING SERVICE STATION ON A 24,295 SF LOT. CONSTRUCTION INCLUDES A 11 ,000 SF BLDG, FOUR FUEL DISPENSERS, AND THREE NEW 12,000 GALLON FUEL TANKS. GENERAL LOCATION AND/OR ADDRESS: 301 SOUTH GRADY WAY PUBLIC APPROVALS REQUIRED : ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW BUILDING PERMIT PUBLIC COMMENTS .WILL BE RECEIVED BY THE BUILDING & Z.ONING DEPARTMENT • .ANYTIME PRIOR . T_O PUBLIC HEARINGS AND DURING PUBLIC HEARINGS. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CALL THE CITY OF RENTON BUILDING & . ZONING DEPARTMENT 235-2550 THIS NOTICE NOT TO BE REMOVED WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION CITY OF RENTON �, = - V L l COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT cw 1' -vim.g;,( `�,w _ '-' '..' 1, 200 Mill Avenue South -Renton, Washington 98055 3 �e '/ ov 996 , - __ _ „:_- --r_a=. RETURN - to F.o , ��SENDER I 0 • Rent I,i 41 - Assoc . - 9043-07 6'0 7-` ��`�A-e, - 5 h�o�,sd. le{ no address Seattle W 9 810 4 Ho such number , . j a;ovcd, not fog ardabte 1 O Addressee unknown - i b 1 4' `" ' -; :'\--: -__ -. ---------- NOTICE OF PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION RENTON, WASHINGTON A Conditional Use Permit Application has been filed and accepted with the Development Services Division of the City of Renton. The following briefly describes the application and the necessary Public Approvals. PROJECT NAME/NUMBER: Chevron Fueling Facility&Retail Bldg CU;ECF-096-90 DESCFiir ION: Applicant seeks to redevelop an existing seivice station on a I - 24,295 sf lot. Construction includes a 1,250 sf bldg, 186 sf utility bldg,four fuel dispensers, and three new 12,000 gallon fuel tanks. GENERAL LOCATION: 301 South Grady Way -PUBLIC APPROVALS: Environmental Review Building Permit The application can be reviewed in the Development Services Division located on the third floor of Renton City Hall. Comments will be accepted anytime prior to Public Hearings, during Public Hearings, or prior to an administrative site plan approval. For further information on the application, or if you wish to be made a PARTY OF RECORD and receive additional notifications, by mail, of the City's environmental determinations, appeal periods and/or the public hearing date(s) for this project, please contact the Development Services Division at 235-2550. Please include the project NUMBER when calling for proper file identification. J / I L.__f I 1 L___J u I____J v S. 7th ST.'7 V . • i • p s.GCad`1 j 17 ')L " m,,1a fl3` ! i I 4 1 li IJa a ffil J.., '-ill Q ,�, �� -v;\,\,_ `� (t l� S.Renton Vllla•e PL. ��I _3 114 \— --' ,11$11 ; I 1 NORTH NEIGHBORHOOD .DETAIL - MAP - SCALE: 1'-200'-0' l , genmalot NOTICE OF PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION I RENTON,WASHINGTON A Conditional Use Permit Application has been filed and accepted with the Development Services Division of the City of Renton. The following briefly describes the application and the necessary Public Approvals. ERetail Bldg PROJECT NAME NUMBER: Chevron FuelingFacility& E F -CU, C -096 90 DESCRIPTION: Applicant seeks to redevelop an existing service station on a 24,295 sf lot. Construction includes a 1,250 sf bldg, 186 sf utility bldg,four fuel dispensers, and three new 12,000 gallon fuel tanks. GENERAL LOCATION: 301 South Grady Way ' PUBLIC APPROVALS: Environmental Review Building Permit The application can be reviewed in the Development Services Division located on the third floor of Renton I City Hall. Comments will be accepted anytime prior to Public Hearings, during Public Hearings, or prior to an administrative site plan approval. For further information on the application, or if you wish to be made a PARTY OF RECORD and receive additional notifications, by mail, of the City's environmental determinations, appeal periods and/or the public hearing date(s) for this project, please contact the Development Services Division at 235-2550. Please include the project NUMBER when calling for proper I' file identification. r J / C 1 I.___1 I I I i I IJ L/ - S. 7th ST.—7 V . ^� , i 4 , -,) ."1,,,"1 (F.:b Z.%4 1-'—'—'—1 I ,!..tult cmt,,,,t,„ u et. 11 n [11 i J co [ //1/I \ q S.Renton Villa a PL. n/I A \ , . e II 1 NORTH 00 NEIGHBORHOOD DETAIL MAP , SCALE: 1"=200.-0" genmalot CITY OF RENTON MEMORANDUM DATE: November/6, 1990 TO: All Reviewing Departments FROM: Mark R. Pywell, Project Manager SUBJECT: Chevron Service Station CU;ECF-096-90 Attached is_a revised site plan for the project listed above. Please check your comments to ensure that they are relevant to the revised project. If you have any new comments please write them on the bottom of this memo and return it to me. If I do not receive any new comments by December 14, 1990 it will be assumed that the existing comments are adequate. If you have any questions please contact me at extension 6167. ■ ROB=AT H. LEE & ASSOCIATES, INC. ARCHITECTURE PLANNING ENGINEERING 1520 140th AVE.N.E. • SUITE 200 • BELLEVUE,WA 99006 • [SOB]746-4677 I JOHN W.JOHNSON Architect November 16, 1990 Mr. Mark R. Pywell AICP Department of Planning/Building/Public Works City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Wa. 98055 RE: Revised Fuel Tank Location for Proposed ;i Chevron Fueling Facility & Retail Store 301 South Grady Way Renton, Wa. jl Dear Mr. Pywell: it In response to your letter dated September 24, 1990. We met with both the Fire Marshall, Mr. Glen Gordon, and a Public Works Engineer from your department, Mr. Gregg Zimmerman. I. Based on these discussions, we relocated the proposed tank locations from the south side of the site to the east side of the site. In response to the revised site plan, Mr. Zimmerman wrote a memo dated November 13, 1990 to the Fire Department (see attached) . The Fire Marshall wrote a letter to me lifting the 3,000 gallon limit in the new location. Please see attached. Based on our revised site plan and the positive determination from the Fire Marshall, I would request that the review process for Cu 093-90 be 'I continued. / I I I have attached a PMT of the revised site plan and 12 bluelines. If there is anything else you need to proceed with the review, please let me know. Sincerely, ROBERT H. LEE & ASSOCIATES, INC. CITY 0 RCN1'OP1..- ; Senior Mark Plannerf` NOV 1 9 1990 BUILDING DIVISION A JtK c Ross CITY OF RENTON _MEMORANDUM. DATE: November 13, 1990 TO: Glen Gordon, Fire Marshall Jim Grey, Fire Code Inspector Mark Pywell, Senior Planner FROM: Gregg Zimmerman 6 Plan Review Supervisor SUBJECT: SOUTH GRADY WAY, CHEVRON STATION RELOCATED FUEL TANKS (ECF;CU-096-90) It was previously determined by the City that the subject project falls within the FEMA 100 year flood plain (Zone AH, elevation 24). Further evaluation showed that the proposed location of the three 10,000 gallon fuel tanks at the southern end of the site did appear to place them within FEMA Zone AH. Since that time the applicant has moved the proposed tank location to the east end of the site. The new proposed location appears to fall within FEMA Zone X, which is outside of the defined 100 year flood plain. Existing grade elevations in this new location appear to be in the 24.75 range, according to a survey map submitted by the applicant. This also identifies grade to be above elevation 24. I would therefore conclude that the new location for the fuel tanks is in an area of the site above the 100 year flood plain as designated by our FEMA maps. I hope this information is of assistance to you in your determination of the design criteria for the proposed fuel tanks. Please give me a call at extension 6178 if you have any questions or comments. Thank you. q"s 'p CITY OF RENTON sail Fire Prevention Bureau Earl Clymer, Mayor Fire Marshal: Glen G.Gordon Chief: A.Lee Wheeler November 14, 1990 ;I Mark Cross, Senior Planner Robert H. Lee & Associates, Inc. 1520 - 140th Avenue Northeast #200 Bellevue, Washington 98005 Dear Mr. Cross: Subject: Proposed Installation of Underground Fuel Tanks - 301 South Grady Way This is in reply to your letter of November 6, 1990, regarding the above-subject matter. Subsequent to your letter, I received correspondence from Gregg Zimmerman, City of Renton Plan Review Supervisor which indicated a relocation of these tanks to the east end of the site. It is my understanding the new location appears to fall within FEMA Zone X, which is outside of the defined 100-year flood plan. Therefore, the Renton Fire Department will approve of the new site for the 12,000 gallon underground storage tank installations. Please feel free to contact me if you have any further questions related to the underground storage tank installations. Sincerely, GLEN G. GORDON Fire Marshal GGG:mbt floodust r^ :� 't . "-:Cd: = :i.. ... ..'-7C' .Mass ..._ ,_._. +Z3'C rr �. •,c•. AM lt]iI`:1'.��"— [I_=_al— 71__a—_ \I,__L_--a___ /oA/\ not Ake I" LROB_RT H. LEE & ASSOC %TES, INC. ARCHITECTURE PLANNING ENGINEERING 1520 140th AVE. N.E. • SUITE 200 • BELLEVUE, WA 98005 • [208]748-4877 JOHN W.JOHNSON Architect November 6, 1990 Mr. Glen Gordon, Fire Marshall PLANNING DIVISION City of Renton CITY OF REIVTON 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Wa. 98055 NOV - 0 1990 RPPt=1VEf� Dear Mr. Gordon, I met with Mr. Greg Zimmermann in the Public Works Department in an attempt to resolve the issue of our proposed fuel tanks being in an area subject to flooding. As a result of that meeting we have relocated our proposed fuel tanks from the south end of the site to the east end of the site. This part of the site is where the existing tanks are located. We submitted three copies of the revised site plan showing the new tank location to Mr. Zimmermann. My understanding is that Mr. Zimmermann will send you a copy of our revised site plan and a written determination that the revised tank relocation is above the 100 year flood plan. A determination by Public Works that the proposed tanks are not in an area subject to the 100 year flood event should be significant in relation to your earlier determination to invoke the 3 , 000 gallon limit of appendix II B of the U.F.C. Based on the relocation of the tanks and the memo from Public Works. We would request that you modify your initial interpretation of the code and allow the 12 , 000 gallon size tanks subject to an engineered design that allows for sufficient hold down to counteract 100% submersion. We think this requirement is valid given the potential for high groundwater but still allows us to approach this common problem with a quality engineered solution. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, ROBERT H. LEE & ASSOC. , INC. Mark Cross, Senior Planner CC: Mark Pywell , Planning Division Jay Hummel, Chevron USA, Inc. 8702\GGORDON.LTR 4i MT) CITY OF RENTON "LL Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Earl Clymer, Mayor Lynn Guttmann, Administrator October 23, 1990 Mark Cross Senior Planner Robert H. Lee&Associates, Inc. 1520-140th Ave. NE, Suite 200 Bellevue,WA 98005 SUBJECT: Chevron Service Center ECF;CU-096-90 -Dear Mr. Cross: In response to your letter, dated October 19, 1990, I am providing a status report of the above referenced project. On October 16, 1990, I met with Jim Gray of the Fire Prevention Bureau and Gregg Zimmerman of the Public Works Division. The intent of this meeting was to review the proposed project in light of the additional information you provided In regards to the FEMA mapping. It was noted that a portion of your project site appears to sit on a small island that is elevated slightly above the surrounding flood zone as indicated on the FEMA map. However, the Fire Prevention Bureau's Uniform Fire Code does not indicate that the requirements apply only if the project Is located in a flood zone according to FEMA mapping but that the requirements for the smaller tank size applies if the project site is located in a flood area. It would appear that the project is located within a flood area even though it is slightly elevated above the flood level. Also, it must be noted that the underground tanks would be located below the flood elevation and that appears to be the real concern here. It is my understanding that the Fire Prevention Bureau has written to the Western Fire Chiefs Association, ICBO, requesting an interpretation of the sections of the Code that are applicable. Specifically, in regards to the use of an"engineered solution"in this case. Before we can continue with the review of this case, a determination is required regarding the use of the 12,000 gallon underground fuel tanks on this project site. The City is working to resolve this issue but since it requires decisions by agencies outside of the City's jurisdiction, it may take some time to obtain these 'I decisions. I will contact you as soon as I receive any new information from the other agencies. If you have any further questions regarding this matter, please contact me at 235-2550. Sincerely, Wr./1 Mark R. P e ,AICP Project.Manager 11 11 11 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton. Washington 9R055 - (20M '15-2569 ! I • ROB�RT H. LEE & ASSOC- TES, INC. ARCHITECTURE PLANNING ENGINEERING !NAM! 1620 140th AVE.N.E. • SUITE 200 • BELLEVUE,WA 96006 • MOB]]746-4677 JOHN W.JOHNSON Architect October 19, 1990 k°N®F VJS,D REruTold OCT 2 4 7990 Mr. Mark R. Pywell, AICP, Project Manager Department of Planning/Building/Public Works � City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA. 98055 Dear Mr. Pywell: During our October 11, 1990 meeting with the Fire Marshall, Mr. Glen Gordon, asked us to get a written interpretation from the Public Works . Department as to the extent of the flooding in the area of our proposal. Whether or not he will interpret the area to still "be subject to flooding" even if Public Works determines that our site is out of the 100 year flood plain, we do not know. We do feel an obligation to get a written determination on the floodplain from your department as per our request dated October 11, 1990. Such a determination will help both the Fire Marshal and Chevron Corporation understand the issue. We have followed your suggestion regarding cooperation with Renton Village on the flooding issue. We contacted their representative, Mr. Lauren Laska. I think we could make a strong case to Chevron to get them to commit to participation in. an LID, but they would need to know the scale of the solution. If there is anything else you can tell us about the effort towards a solution to the flooding problem in the area, we would like to know. Your letter of September 24, 1990 does make reference to the 100 year flood event and to the FEMA maps suggesting to us "You may want to work with them to remove the potential flooding from this site and to have the site removed from the FEMA map for this area. " For the record, we feel that the information supplied to you on October 11, 1990 shows that our site is not in the one hundred year flood plain and is not designated as being in the one hundred year event by FEMA. It was never so designated. • I Your letter does state that "At the time that the site is removed from the flood area designation, we will be able to continue processing your application as submitted. " Now that Public Works section of your department has confirmed that we are out of the one hundred year flood plain, I would anticipate either a decision by your section of the Planning/Building/Public Works department to continue the processing of our permit or to revise the reason for not continuing the process. I realize that these issues are difficult ones. Your continued work on them is appreciated. Sincerely, � Mark Cross, Senior Planner CC: Jay Hummel, Engineer, Chevron USA Inc. 8498\float ROBERT H.LEE&ASSOCIATES ROB'cAT H. LEE & ASSOC`■-P4TES, INC. ARCHITECTURE PLANNING ENGINEERING 1520 140th AVE.N.E. • SUITE 200 • BELLEVUE,WA 98005 • [20B]74B-4877 JOHN W.JOHNBON Architect, October 3, 1990 PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF RENTON Mr. Jim Grey, Plans Inspector City of Renton Fire Department OCT m 5 1990 Municipal Building 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Wa. 98055 Dear Mr. Grey; ,! I received the results of the Technical Advisory Committee review of the proposed Chevron Convenience Store and Fueling Facility in a letter dated September 24, 1990. The lette r included the concern that there is a buoyancy problem with the 12, 000 gallon tanks due to the location of the project 11 being in the 100 year flood plan. Although we were surprised by the 100 year flood plan designation, the concern about buoyancy of fuel tanks is a common one. Tanks of the size and design proposed are commonly constructed in high groundwater locations. Normally we would provide the local jurisdiction with plans and I° calculations stamped by a registered structural engineer to demonstrate that the effects of buoyancy have been adequately �r addressed. The solution usually includes concrete anchors and tiedowns combined with the weight of the overlaymemt. We have read the contents of UFC 1988 Appendix IIB Section (d) that 1 limits tank size to 3,000 gallons. However, Section 79. 601 (c) appears to allow the construction of tanks of various sizes as long 11 as "suitable _precautions shall be observed to anchor the tank in ,I place". Further, the section appears to allow the use of standards from Appendix II-B or the "manufacturers installation instructions for tanks in locations that may be flooded. Section 2.301 (a) gives the Chief or Designated Fire Marshal the authority to "modify any of the provisions of this code upon it application. . .provided that the spirit of the code shall be complied with, public safety secured and substantial justice done" . We ask, on behalf of Chevron, that you review these sections of the Uniform Fire Code with Fire Marshal. October 3 , 1990 Page 2 We are not asking you to approve the use of any tank size or design with this letter. What we are requesting is that you agree to review Manufacturer's Specifications and appropriate design and calculations that demonstrate the specific tanks and construction features proposed at this site will alleviate the buoyancy issue and satisfy the intent of the limitation on tank size in appendix II-B. Sincerely, ROBERT H. LEE AND ASSOCIATES, INC. Mark Cross Senior Planner CC: Jay Hummel, Engineer Chevron Usa, Inc. Mark Pywell, Project Manager City of Renton ROBERT H.LEE S.ASSOCIATES 4, • • r• 79.601 UNIFORM FIRE CODE • • Division VI TANK STORAGE UNDERGROUND, OUTSIDE OR UNDER BUILDINGS General • Sec.79.601. (a) Location. A flammable or combustible liquid storage tank • may be located underground,outside of or under a building if such installation • meets the requirements of this section.The tank shall be so located with respect to . ... existing foundations and supports that the loads carried by the latter cannot be • transmitted to the tank.The distance from any part of a tank storing liquids to the . nearest wall of any basement,pit,cellar or property line shall be not less than 3 • feet.A minimum distance of 1 foot, shell to shell,shall be maintained between underground tanks. (b)Depth and Coven Excavation for underground storage tanks shall be made with due care to avoid undermining of foundations of existing structures.Under- ground tanks shall be set on firm foundation and surrounded with at least 6 inches of noncorrosive inert material such as clean sand or gravel well tamped in place or in accordance with the manufacturer's installation instructions. Tanks shall be covered with a minimum of 2 feet of earth or shall be covered by not less than 1 foot of earth,on top of which shall be placed a slab of reinforced concrete not less than 4 inches thick. When underground tanks are or are likely to be subjected to traffic,they shall be protected against damage from vehicles passing over them by at least 3 feet of earth cover,or 18 inches of well-tamped earth plus 6 inches of reinforced concrete, or 8 inches of asphaltic concrete. When asphaltic or rein- forced concrete paving is used as part of the protection, it shall extend at least 1 • foot horizontally beyond the outline of the tank in all directions. '' ` ''' '"•:::-.::.,:!,-;.....,. ..:,., For tanks built in accordance with Section 79.105, the burial depth and the height of the vent line shall be such that the static head imposed at the bottom of the tank will not exceed 10 psig if the fill or vent pipe is filled with liquid. If the depth of cover exceeds 7 feet or the manufacturer's specifications, the tank manufacturer shall be consulted to determine if reinforcements are required. • .• •. Nonmetallic underground tanks shall be installed in accordance with manufac- • turer's instructions. The minimum depth of cover shall be as specified in this (: - - ' • subsection. • (c)Anchorage.Where a tank may become buoyant due to a rise in the level of the water table or due to location in an area that may be subjected to flooding, suitable precautions shall be observed to anchor the tank in place.See Appendix II-B or manufacturer's installation instructions for tanks in locations that may be Flooded_ • (d) Leaking Minks. Leaking tanks shall be promptly emptied and removed ( •, • ,- ' from the ground,abandoned in accordance with Section 79.115,or the chief may '� • . permit the tank to be repaired by an approved method and may require recommen- dations from a qualified engineer. 260 . i i • • . .. • ��:' • • • ,f ai.,. ;. i Gi ,�tBtEf"&f1 _.. - :,•a:�;.�':r t% ::�i- ' 'f%� wf:• • 3 '' Ti: ' .t . :�:. ..: •i t.� F�r.I•I :•L1E�: •���t•IC:t :. "... :i :ic.� �:���#g!ai z :w� ,�.;_".C.r.�_1 � 'ct�iyy�yJJ iI I • %0 CITY (�F RENTON Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Earl Clymer, Mayor Lynn Guttmann, Administrator ', ,l September 24, 1990 Mark Cross Robert H. Lee&Associates, Inc. 1520 140th Ave. N.E., Suite 200 Bellevue,WA 98005 0 0 • SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit for . Chevron Fueling Facility 0 ECF;CU 096-90 Dear Mr. Cro ss: , • If. The conditional use permit application referenced above, was reviewed by the Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) on September 21, 1990. tAC determined that this project Is located within the 100 year flood plain and that, according to the Unif.Irm Fire Code, the maximum size for an underground storage tank in this area would be 3,000 gallons. his is due to the concern that larger tanks that were not full • during a flood could break loose due to t e buoyancy of the larger tanks. The application submitted indicates that three 12,000 gallon tanks were being proposed. It is my understanding that Renton Village is proposing to upgrade the storm drainage facilities in this area 1. to reduce or remove the potential for floodi g. You may wish to work with them to remove the potential flooding from this site and to have the site removed from the FEMA map for this area. At the time that the II site is removed from the flood area designa'ion, we will be able to continue processing your application as submitted. The only other alternative would be to am:nd the application to use the smaller tanks. There is also a chance that you could construct a raised a ea on the site that would be above the flood level In which to place the 12,000 gallon underground tanks. However, this would require you to provide a compensation area equal to the amount of flood plain this -tructure would displace. Please let me know which of these alternat ves you plan to follow or if you have another alternative you wish to discuss with the City. 0 If you have any questions regarding this mat er, please contact me at 235-2550. i Sincerely, Mark R. Pywell, 0 • Project Manager • • • • 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (2061 235-761I . . . •. < : • :•>:.;:.._.::.::•>:;:;:...; F 1 C iG ??,: ::..: : IC:.::.<::::: O:>:: . ........:....:.::::.:•:::::::::::: ::::YVG IU B:.L. ......... .. .:.:.::: : > : :::.:::<:::::::: :O ;PLAfiINI . . C:O MiT.EE.:: ::::::::::::> : ::> :: : :>::::: ::bEPARTVENT. ALlp11SQRY ::.:. : :.:.: . : ::> :.. : : : :::>:::.>:< :>:: < T�CHN F:REP : RT:: ':>: :<. .::•;:::>:>:» :.. .: :>:;::;:.:: .:.:..:::.:..:.::•:� :::..:.:.:.:.....:..::.. :.. :.�.::i: • < ::: ::: : .'.::..:..S ` :: : :<:: ..�.':. ::...... ..... ..z »Che roi US ::::::. . :> < :< :>�<<:::» :: v> :: AP ...LCANT: : . Fll .& e <:::::: < .`.:.: :., :: :'Fefiri` . s : `' < `'?.. .::..:...:.�,:..•�:::::�::`: :�:::, : :: ` ' : ::>» > : . .i. ..... .. .. .: : >` ;. . . 0 :90 : > . :.:. .:. . ..... ..N:>:: T ::, ::ECF. ..0 .= 9.:°.. . . . itm oNMENTAL: H , baa .. .n. ..t.o.n ...u:.':.l... e:.:..f.a •liti .. ii .:::>:::>:::::� NVI.FO. Allcat<: �eeks.. o..o . ..*.. : t` iwit a u . 1 : . :; ;::< > n errce.:.st.a . ......... : ::SCRiPTN:::OpROPOSL: e:ace:an;;exltin :: : :.:::: : : :.<.>:. .::::>: ::: < :: DE : 0. ::.::. .: : : :r. . lbuIdg : :::: ::::.:: : ::::: i : :H:: > . : : . :...::: ....:.:.::... . and:reai; . : ::. . :..........:....: .:..:: .::.: : ... :: :: : : •: :: :: :. ..:::::::..•......: : ::: :..:: ::: : . 0oU . .y.:......Y:::::::..: .: L :; `::>: < 3 :. . . ...... ..LQCATIO.NO. ::PO?OA< . ...... .. . • J / 11 I I I L—� I i l—J L.../ + S. 7th ST. I j j I • ED _ i �,ay I p� GVady [ - it S• fl 9 — i 1 i • :(1:i # — r-\I I ?. fl ..i, . �' LRtc l 1 // J . nviL. 1 i' Ili i CI i � � ii NORTH W OQ i • • 4 . . • .Technical Advisory CommitteC staff Report Chevron Fueling Facility &Retail Building 1. September 21, 1990 Page 2 • • .. SSU S LAND USE 1. Whether the proposed project is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan zoning designation and with Goals, Policies and Objectives set forth in the Plan? The proposed service station is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan Map which designates the project site for Commercial uses, and with Comprehensive Plan elements for commercial uses. The proposed project is also consistent with Plan Elements for the Central Plan area. 2. Whether the proposed project is consistent with the land use map zoning designation and applicable Zoning Ordinance components? • The subject property is zoned for Business District use, which permits the proposed service station providing a conditional use permit is approved. The proposed project adequately addresses development standards for commercial uses (4-31-10). 3. Whether the proposed development is consistent with the Zoning Ordinance and other applicable,regulations/standards? The properties to the east, west and south are zoned for Business District use, the properties to the north of the project site are zoned for Light Industrial use. 4.. Whether the proposed development is compatible with vicinity land uses. To the west of the project site is a hotel, to the south and east are office buildings and retail stores and to the north are auto dealerships. The proposed use is compatible with the surrounding land I uses. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Whether the applicant has adequately identified and addressed the following environmental impacts likely to occur in conjunction with the proposed development. a. Aesthetics/Land.Use Impacts: The proposed development includes demolition of the existing building, construction of a new 1100 s.f. building, construction of a 176 s.f. utility building and replacement of three 12,000 gallon underground fuel tanks. A 45 X 92 foot canopy will cover the main building and,the four fueling stations. Two standard parking spaces and one handicapped parking space will be provided on site in • .accordance with the Municipal Code. A six foot wide sidewalk and a minimum ten foot wide landscape strip will be installed along South Grady Way as is required by Code. In addition to the Code requirement, the applicant will also be providing a landscape strip along the south,boundary of the project site. • The plans submitted by the applicant indicate that the majority of the landscape area along Grady Way will be covered by turf. Staff feels that the majority of the area should be landscaped with shrubs and flowers. The applicant will be required to submit a modified landscape plan for the project site. Mitigation Measures: Modification to the landscape plan. Policy Nexus: Environmental Review Ordinance, 4-6 b. Natural Environment Impacts: The existing site is entirely covered in asphalt, concrete and building. In the • construction of the new project, the applicant will be providing new landscaped areas. The applicant has also indicated that the site will no longer provide an area for repairing of automobiles. This should reduce some of the contaminates (e.g., oil) from collecting on' the site and washing into the storm drains. The applicant will be installing oil/watery separators to ensure that oil does not get into the storm drains. Mitigation Measures: None Technical Advisory CommittL—taff Report Chevron Fueling Facility& Retail Building September 21, 1990 Page 3 Policy Nexus: Environmental Review Ordinance 4-6 c. Traffic See attached report. d. Noise, Light and Glare Impacts: 1) Construction: Noise, light and glare are anticipated in conjunction with construction activities. Some mitigation of these impacts will be achieved through restrictions on hauling hours and construction activities. No additional mitigation measures will be required as the site is surrounded mainly by office and light industrial uses. 2) Operations: The existing service bays will not be included in the new service station. Noise s generated by the repairing of vehicles will be eliminated. New lights will be .. installed as part of this project. The plans indicate that the lights are designed to retain glare on the project site. The Police Department has recommended that non-reflective glass be used throughout the project to reduce the potential for glare. Mitigation Measures: It is recommended that the applicant use non-reflective glass throughout the project to reduce the potential for glare. Policy Nexus: Not applicable. e. Public Services 1) Police and Fire Service Impacts: Police and Fire Prevention Bureau staff report adequate resources to provide anticipated services to the site during construction activities and operations with system improvement fees and with Code-required improvements. The Fire Prevention Bureau staff has indicated that the project will be required to comply with U.F.C. and Ordinance 4144 regarding the installation of new underground storage tanks. Mitigation Measures: None required. Policy Nexus: Environmental Review Ordinance 4-6, Ordinance 4144 2) Recreation Impacts: Parks and Recreation Department staff have recommended that the proponent review the proposed Trails Master Plan and provide for future pedestrian access connecting to the Renton Shopping Center and adjacent office buildings. Mitigation Measures: The applicant shall provide for pedestrian access to the adjacent land uses. Policy Nexus: Environmental Review Ordinance 4-6 3) Storm Water Impacts: The majority of the project site will be covered by impervious materials after the completion of construction on the project site. The Storm Water Section of Planning/Building/Public Works has indicated the project must meet the requirements of the 1990 King County Surface Water Design Manual. Mitigation Measures: None required. Policy Nexus: Environmental Review Ordinance 4-6 Technical Advisory Committr: Report Chevron Fueling Facility& Retail Building September 21, 1990 Page 4 4) Public Utilities • Impacts: Public utility lines are generally available to serve the site. The installation of a new side sewer will have to meet City Codes. Mitigation Measures: None required Policy Nexus: Not applicable ignifi ce :�::C:>:>:: >R1✓:C01111.MEND/aTI:O.NS ::>.::>;::»>::>::: :.:<:»TEa...t<tfie:::ERC�issue a....e.e .......................... .. .. .. ...... . ...... • ..................... . . 1) Prior to the issuance of site preparation/building permits, the applicant shall submit a revised landscape plan demonstrating an enhanced plan for the Grady Way area, to the satisfaction of the Development Planing Section of Planing/Building/Public Works. Note: The applicant shall comply with all Municipal Code requirements. :>D•• : : • <C•••• 1111. . .. . R: V:lE11 :I:NG:. .:. . : 1R....... .... ... ::.::::::.::::::::::::::::::::::::::...:.::::::::::::..:..:...::::::::::.:.:.::::: mri n s a e to .o ec ::::;;::::::::::VariousCit:.;:de artments>have:::reviewed::and:::commented:::upon..:..:e..P...:J.:...:...:..:...:•......:...:..:.:•:....:...:....:.::...:...::::: ... .. ... .... .. ........ .. LAND USE Police Department: Approved. All glass is to be nonreflective. Fire Prevention Bureau: Approved with standard conditions. Installation of new UST's to comply with UFC &Ordinance 4144. • Storm Water: The project must meet the requirements of the 1990 King County Surface Water Design Manual. The applicant to .furnish storm drainage analysis and calculations for the site. Water Utilities: One new fire hydrant will need to be installed on the south side of Grady Way to meet Fire Dept. required fire flow. Sewer Utilities: Installation of side sewer to new building location will have to meet current City of Renton codes. Parks and Recreation: Approved. See environmental comments. Construction: Approved. Development Planning: Must comply with following codes: CU, parking, landscaping, grade &fill, storm, fire, building. Long Range Planning: Approved subject to provision of mitigation measures for potential fire and explosion hazards, to the satisfaction of Fire Dept. ENVIRONMENTAL Police Department: Project not expected to have significant impact as it is replacing an existing operation. Fire.Prevention Bureau: Required to comply with UFC & City Ordinance 4144 • (UST regulations). Storm Water: Minor impact to existing storm drainage system. Water Utilities: Minor impact to the existing water system. Technical Advisory Committ taff Report Chevron Fueling Facility & Retail Building September 21, 1990 Page 5 Sewer Utilities: No impact on the existing sanitary sewer system. Parks and Recreation: Recommend the proponent review the Proposed Trails Master Plan and future pedestrian access connection to Renton Village Shopping Center. Construction: Probable minor impact. Development Planning: 1) Landscaping should be thematically integrated with Center; 2) Check on-site parking re: code requirements; 3) Check nonexclusive parking - cannot be used to meet parking requirements -also it appears to be in a roadway; 4) Check with traffic on volume impacts; access points seem quite close to the street - will there be queueing onto Grady; 5) I wonder about safety & aesthetics from outdoor lavatories; 6) will excavation require PSAPCA permits?; 7) Is soils study necessary re: tank removal; and 8) What about storm drainage/flooding -water table is high here. Long Range Planning: The proposed land use is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. However, the proposed project may create environmental health hazards, such as fire and explosion. Adequate mitigation measures should be required. ....................... ........... ... ............... .... ::::>:: ::::<.;::»::: ::::;:::::.:N];:;:::>;:>:;:.;:.;;::.::. '. .: .>:.;:. <... .. .... . o...Renton:.:.::::::.::.::::.....::::::.::.::..::::::.::iNi ::.:. .:...:.:::..::...:...... 1. > :> a hnl I:>c ca . . vl ...... .::... ..::: . .:::....::...:.: .....:.. ......:........... Ad sor ;:com . tt m : . < . :MEETING N TICE.:; ::: :::< :<:;: :::>;::;;: : :« <:: :::>:::>: >: :>:::<: :>sl September 21, 1990 To: Gregg Zimmerman Rubin Yu Glen Gordon Sam Chastain Penny Bryant �: Jim Hanson From: Don Erickson, Chairman ee in .D .. .. ... ...... ......Se tember.21;::1990;. :`: : :: `>>:'::`:';` : �': :::; � ::<: : : ::�::: ;� ::. :>:::: :>::::::: :::R :e iiiii ............. • octi n....a o Third F.loor.. of r .. .::: :.::.... : :::::... :: ::::::::: :::::: :::::::: ::::::: ::.:::: . .... .......:.:.. : .:... :::.... ..... . Co a ence Room::;::>: >>:>:::<:>»:>:>:::»> < :: <::: <z:::>:<:>::> >:»::<< ::::>::>::<::>: :>::»:�:::z::< Agenda is listed.below. TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE AGENDA SEPTEMBER 21, 1990 . Third Floor Conference Room Commencing at 8:30 AM TIME/KEY PARTICIPANTS NEW PROJECTS ' CHEVRON USA, INC. CU;ECF-096-90 To redevelop an existing service station on a 24,295 sf lot. Construction includes a 11,000 sf bldg, four fuel dispensers, and three new 12,000 gallon fuel tanks. The project is located at 301 South Grady Way. • ' HUNT BULKHEAD SM-089-90 Applicant seeks to construct a bulkhead adjacent to a single-family home on Lake Washington (with a foundation of approximately 125 cubic yards of fill within the Lake). This bulkhead would be designed to join existing bulkheads on properties immediately to the . south and to the north of the subject property. A Substantial Shoreline Permit is required under the Shoreline Master Program and environmental review is • required by SEPA, based upon the proposed fill/improvement action. The project is located at 2807 Mountain View Avenue. I i ( I DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING/BUILDING/PUsC WORKS cNi�� ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET �O`�R04frioN N REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: i ei1n. 1, '10 DATE CIRCULATED: 8/27/90 COMMENTSax:O94' W EFC-096-90 RECEIVED APPLICATION NO(S): CU-096-90 AUG 2 8 1990 PROPONENT: Mark Cross BUILDING DIVISION PROJECT TITLE: Chevron Fueling Facility&Retail Bldg BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: To redevelop an existing service station on a 24,295 sf lot. Construction include Is a 11,000 sf bldg,four fuel dispensers,and three new 12,000 gallon fuel tanks. LOCATION: 301 South Grady Way SITE AREA: 24,295 sf(0.56 acres) BUILDING AREA(gross): 11,000 sf S IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS: - PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth 2. Air 3. Water 4. Plants 5. Animals 6. Energy&Natural Resources 11 7. Environmental Health 8. Land &Shoreline Use v 9. Housing • i 10. Aesthetics 11. Light&Glare 12. Recreation 13. Historic&Cultural Preservation 14. Transportation 1 15. Public Services 16. Utilities COMMENTS: We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probabl impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. / 6 -/ 70--Pfa "atz..074.__________ _ Si6nature of Director or Authorized Representative Date Rev. i/88 r . A DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF-096-90 APPLICATION NO(S).: CU-096-90 PROPONENT: Mark Cross PROJECT TITLE: Chevron Fueling Facility&Retail Bldg BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: To redevelop an existing service station on a 24,295 sf lot. Construction includes a 11,000 sf bldg,four fuel dispensers, and three new 12,000 gallon fuel tanks. LOCATION: 301 South Grady Way TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED TAC DATE: 9/21/90 ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT— F'COMMU DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION CURRENT PLANNING LONG RANGE PLANNING PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5:00 P.M. ON SEPTEMBER 10, 1990. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED //36/ DATE: SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 5/90 �•;� ~' DEPARTII/LkT OF PLANNING/BUILDING/RI, .21C WORKSt.ANNONG DIV,SeON crrY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET AUGII , 291990 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: ��r� 9�L���'lcTY\ C dV ED DATE CIRCULATED: 8/27/90 COMMENTS DUE: 9/1 OaproN FIRED PT. FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU EFC-096-90 APPLICATION NO(S): CU-096-90 AUG 2 199' PROPONENT: Mark Cross RECEIVE PROJECT TITLE: Chevron Fueling Facility&Retail Bldg BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: To redevelop an existing service station on a 24,295 sf lot. Construction includes a #1 8�6�sf bldg, four fuel dispensers, and three new 12,000 gallon fuel tanks. L//-6 br- - LOCATION: 301 South Grady Way SITE AREA: 24,295 sf (0.56 acres) BUILDING AREA (gross): 11,000 sf IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS: PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE 'I MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth 2. Air 3. Water 4. Plants 5. Animals 6. Energy& Natural Resources 7. Environmental Health 8. Land &Shoreline Use 9. Housing 10. Aesthetics 11. Light&Glare 12. Recreation 13. Historic&Cultural Preservation • 14. Transportation 15. Public Services c/ 16. Utilities COMMENTS: 7770—aie., c6,-)-n/4_,z664-,t4 e We have reviewed this application withparticular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified pp p areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. aer. /77O Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date Rev. 6/88 _ i. , d' DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF-096-90 APPLICATION NO(S).: CU-096-90 PROPONENT: Mark Cross PROJECT TITLE: Chevron Fueling Facility&Retail Bldg BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: To redevelop an existing service station on a 24,295 sf lot. Construction includes a 11,000 sf bldg,four fuel dispensers, and three new 12,000 gallon fuel tanks. d, LOCATION: 301 South Grady Way TO: • PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED TAC DATE: 9/21/90 ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION CURRENT PLANNING LONG RANGE PLANNING PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5:00 P.M. ON SEPTEMBER 10, REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: -re- Pre ev -ct A. fire- APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED shall comply with current Fire and Building Codes and ordi- nances. development and/or construction P Y nances. A second means of approved access is required. Fire Department access roads/lanes shall be paved minimum width 20 { minimum height 13' 6 .0 U (Do is Preliminary lire flow calculations show a fire flow of a� �,�� m each required. 2 hydrants with a minimum flow of i gP is required. �5D feet of the structure, Primary hydrant is required to be within 30' feet of the Secondary hydrants are required to be within structure. / An approved automatic sprinkler system is required to protect the total structure. Y s Yes ,j Naoo_,. P JG I All fire department access roads are to be paved and installed prior to construction. All fire hydrants are required to be installed and approved prior to construction. Yes____ I _. ( 7/1-e-eu Z.?/- -9. 7--- .. ce,--7/4/4 -/-64/4----1' /<-• 69- 9& er764e'm y/</ _ Lifie,j - --- - DATE: 9� MCJ SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 5/90 ,(rexi/0C)Ag 65)iz)4/ 4 P N REQUIRED FIRE FLOW CALCULATIONS 1. HAZARD IDENTIFICATION INFORMATION NAME C,/ed2oko sE2v/e g U.B.C.-�/0I0 U.B.C. CLASS OF BUILD ADDRESS - o/ • 4.0,0yx›/ tits FIRE MGMT AREA 2. DETERMINE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION - CLASS (CIRCLE ONE): I - II IV III V FIRE-RESISTIVE NON-COMBUSTIBLE ORD Y WOOD FRAME MIXED (NOTE: IF "MIXED", SEE SPECIAL INSTRUCTION FOR AREA AND BASIC FIRE FLOW) 3. DETERMINE AREA: GROUND FLOOR AREA: FT2 (A) NUMBER OF STORIES: TOTAL BUILDING AREA: A/, A//.5 4. DETERMINE BASIC FIRE FLOW FROM TABLE #1, USING AREA (A): I Z-so GPM; (B) 5. DETERMINE OCCUPANCY FACTOR ADJUSTMENT: ADJUSTMENT: C) GPM (C) IF LOW HAZARD, SUBTRACT UP TO 25% OF (B):. IF HIGH HAZARD, ADD UP TO 25% OF (B) 6. COMPUTE SUB-TOTAL (B+C):. (IF B+C IS LESS THAN 500 GPM, INSERT 500 GPM) / Z 5 v GPM (D) 7. DETERMINE SPRINKLER ADJUSTMENT: . ADJUSTMENT: 0 GPM (E) (IF COMPLETELY SPR.INKLERED, SUBTRACT UP TO 50% OF (D): IF LIGHT HAZARD OCCUPANCY 1 AND FIRE RESISTIVE OR NON-COMBUSTIBLE CONSTRUCTION, SUBTRACT UP TO 75% OF CD). 8. DETERMINE EXPOSURE ADJUSTMENT: USING THE TABLE AT LEFT AS A GUIDE, ENTER THE SEPARATION AND ADJUSTMENT FOR EACH OF THE "FOUR FACES" OF THE BUILDING IN THE TABLE AT THE RIGHT: SEPARATION MAk. ADJUSTMENT EXPOSURE SEPARATION ACT. ADJ. 0 - 10 25% MAX. NORTH / sc›'-f- ADD -- - % 11 - 30 20% MAX. EAST --/ . ADD is- % 31 - 60 15% MAX. SOUTH ` . 1' ADD /S % 61 -100 10% MAX. WEST 4/5, ADD / - % 101 -150 5% MAX. TOTAL % OF ADJUSTMENT 150 OR 4-HR WALL 0% MAX. (NOT TO EXCEED 75%) : 4/51 % (TOTAL % ADJUSTMENT TIMES CD) ADJUSTMENT: *- S 1 Z_5 GPM (F) 9. DETERMINE ROOF AND SIDING COVERING ADJUSTMENT: • (IF SHINGLE COVERING, ADD 500 GPM) ADJUSTMENT: 7) GPM (G) 10. COMPUTE ESTIMATED FIRE FLOW REQUIRED: • (IF D+E+F+G IS LESS THAN 500 GPM, INSERT 500 GPM) (IF D+E+F+G IS GREATER THAN 12,0 0 0 GPM, INSERT 12,1230 GPM) I z (D+E+F+G) REQUIRED FIRE FLOW: Z,OoO GPM (H) • 11. SIGNED: /-/L41c.- Ar-IL__ GATE ilG Z9, /990 i ' I . A • Lf DEPARTIV:,.I T OF PLANNING/BUILDING/PL.-..IC WORKS ,;, ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: / DATE CIRCULATED: 8/27/90 COMMENTS DUE: 9/10/90 444, EFC-096-90Ae APPLICATION NO(S): CU-096-90 ::poi PROPONENT: Mark Cross 199 PROJECT TITLE: Chevron Fueling Facility&Retail Bldg 44 vt) BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: To redevelop an existing service station on a 24,295 sf lot. Construction includes a 11,000 sf bldg, four fuel dispensers, and three new 12,000 gallon fuel tanks. LOCATION: 301 South Grady Way SITE AREA: 24,295 sf(0.56 acres) BUILDING AREA (gross): 11,000 sf IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS: PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE 'I MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth 2. Air 3. Water III 4. Plants 5. Animals 6. Energy&Natural Resources 7. Environmental Health 8. Land &Shoreline Use 9. Housing 10. Aesthetics 11. Light&Glare 12. Recreation 13. Historic&Cultural Preservation 14. Transportation 15. Public Services 16. Utilities ''II__ o Paul COMMENTS: /� —ppt=e We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. ign ure of Director or Authorized Representative Date Rev. 6/88 - DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF-096-90 APPLICATION NO(S).: CU-096-90 PROPONENT: Mark Cross PROJECT TITLE: Chevron Fueling Facility&Retail Bldg BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: To redevelop an existing service station on a 24,295 sf lot. Construction includes a 11,000 sf bldg,four fuel dispensers, and three new 12,000 gallon fuel tanks. LOCATION: 301 South Grady Way TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED TAC DATE: 9/21/90 ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION CURRENT PLANNING LONG RANGE PLANNING PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5:00 P.M. ON SEPTEMBER 10, 1990. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED II /r4 — � I DATE: � d — �D SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 5/90 DEPARTL-.—.1T OF PLANNING/BUILDING/PL,,,-J.IC WORKS ENVIRONMENTAL.CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET tic • REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: RA IC C- <c ,© .,'G DATE CIRCULATED: 8/27/90 COMMENTS DUE: 9/1 O/ . ?9,a, EFC-096-90 N.0 APPLICATION NO(S): CU-096-90 PROPONENT: Mark Cross PROJECT TITLE: Chevron Fueling Facility&Retail Bldg BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: To redevelop an existing service station on a 24,295 sf lot. Construction includes a 11,000 sf bldg, four fuel dispensers, and three new 12,000 gallon fuel tanks. LOCATION: 301 South Grady Way SITE AREA: 24,295 sf(0.56 acres) BUILDING AREA (gross): 11,000 sf IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS: PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth 2. Air 3. Water 4. Plants 5. Animals 6. Energy& Natural Resources 7. Environmental Health 8. Land &Shoreline Use 9. Housing 10. Aesthetics 11. Light&Glare 12. Recreation 13. Historic&Cultural Preservation 14. Transportation 15. Public Services 16. Utilities COMMENTS: i-3,17i5 (,4AA 6 C, I '.2- it e.10( u CC-A Lew QAC,�2 L+r� -f--i -�v�- v We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. cD) Ogioqb Signature of Director or Authorized Repr„ ntative( Date Rev. 6/88 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF-096-90 APPLICATION NO(S).: CU-096.-90 PROPONENT: Mark Cross PROJECT TITLE: Chevron Fueling Facility& Retail Bldg BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: To redevelop an existing service station on a 24,295 sf lot. Construction includes a 11,000 sf bldg,four fuel dispensers, and three new 12,000 gallon fuel tanks. LOCATION: 301 South Grady Way TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED TAC DATE: 9/21/90 ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION CURRENT PLANNING LONG RANGE PLANNING PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5:00 P.M. ON SEPTEMBER 10, 1990. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: 6 I IC,P-- APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED acm, tyy 1-0 A/L r A DATE: v"!(V"r SIGNATURE OF DIRECTO OR AU RIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 5/90 Jf )_ DEPARTML=_T OF PLANNING/BUILDING/PLC WORKSiviNc OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET step v,„7.-wH 0 tq� ,'000 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: o.�► 1 DATE CIRCULATED: 8/27/90 COMMENTS DUE: 9/10/90 k440 EFC-096-90 APPLICATION NO(S): CU-096-90 PROPONENT: Mark Cross PROJECT TITLE: Chevron Fueling Facility&Retail Bldg BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: To redevelop an existing service station on a 24,295 sf lot. Construction include'a 11,000 sf bldg,four fuel dispensers, and three new 12,000 gallon fuel tanks. LOCATION: 301 South Grady Way SITE AREA: 24,295 sf(0.56 acres) BUILDING AREA (gross): 11,000 sf IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS: PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE 1 MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth 2. Air 3. Water 4. Plants 5. Animals 6. Energy&Natural Resources 7. Environmental Health 8. Land &Shoreline Use 9. Housing 10. Aesthetics 11. Light&Glare 12. Recreation 13. Historic&Cultural Preservation 14. Transportation 15. Public Services 16. Utilities COMMENTS:' We have reviewed/this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. pe Signature of Director or Authorize epresentative Date Rev.,6/88 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF-096-90 APPLICATION NO(S).: CU-096-90 PROPONENT: Mark Cross PROJECT TITLE: Chevron Fueling Facility&Retail Bldg BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: To redevelop an existing service station on a 24,295 sf lot. Construction includes a 11,000 sf bldg,four fuel dispensers, and three new 12,000 gallon fuel tanks. LOCATION: 301 South Grady Way TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED TAC DATE: 9/21/90 ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION CURRENT PLANNING LONG RANGE PLANNING PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5:00 P.M. ON SEPTEMBER 10, 1990. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: 1Anct V APPROVED X APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED -" P4) G i I�I r J DATE: SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR R AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 5/90 ' • DEPARTM'�:."T OF PLANNING/BUILDING/PU ;.:C WORD ....4V ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: S�ti•sY1 W �'>> 9/ , DATE CIRCULATED: 8/27/90 COMMENTS DUE: 9/1`Q e 990 cl S�'r ING DIVISION EFC-096-90 ���'`CITV OF RENTON icF APPLICATION NO(S): CU-096-90 Sp 1 2 1990 PROPONENT: Mark Cross ECE ED PROJECT TITLE: Chevron Fueling Facility&Retail Bldg BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: To redevelop an existing service station on a 24,295 sf lot. Construction include's a 11,000 sf bldg, four fuel dispensers, and three new 12,000 gallon fuel tanks. LOCATION: 301 South Grady Way ' SITE AREA: 24,295 sf(0.56 acres) BUILDING AREA (gross): 11,000 sf IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS: PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth 2. Air 3. Water 4. Plants 5. Animals 6. Energy&Natural Resources 7. Environmental Health 8. Land &Shoreline Use 9. Housing 10. Aesthetics 11. Light&Glare 12. Recreation 13. Historic&Cultural Preservation 14. Transportation 15. Public Services 16. Utilities COMMENTS: , f//1/O a-/N,14c--" 70 ,EX/.T774/ O $7b( . 0,4110 q, SySVt14f We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Aes? P off.,47_7 _ 70 Signature of Director or Authorized Representat e ) Date �"' Rev. 6/88 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF-096-90 APPLICATION NO(S).: CU-096-90 PROPONENT: Mark Cross PROJECT TITLE: Chevron Fueling Facility& Retail Bldg BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: To redevelop an existing service station on a 24,295 sf lot. Construction includes a 11,000 sf bldg,four fuel dispensers, and three new 12,000 gallon fuel tanks. LOCATION: 301 South Grady Way TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED TAC DATE: 9/21/90 ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION CURRENT PLANNING LONG RANGE PLANNING PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5:00 P.M. ON SEPTEMBER 10, 1990. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: 'nbYxv, L Z.V APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED has �'�cT Muir b FE T 775/s I viitifK+&TS /Nc cov i g 1C Ti,', j q`� C7 �C Sv ' w47 x. OEf/ M scvvv 4 L . 7'//i 4//9 tc4i e To Pubs. ism 17° rv" M/Q/Am C E 4/V 4 L y s/$ iterVtz <Az. c 4,4reow$ ,coif s s,T . DATE: 7-7 - 90 SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 5/90 DEPARTM'k T OF PLANNING/BUILDING/PU'...JC WORKS ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: CA70.4e4r- UAlk /� �/C� 9/10/u9 s.... DATE CIRCULATED: 8/27/90 COMME . fin: ��"►:�,: L/• EFC-096-90 LL 4l/ APPLICATION NO(S): CU-096-90 G v kt 0 4) PROPONENT: Mark Cross O�1S+ e410,e.4 . /pp J PROJECT TITLE: Chevron Fueling Facility&Retail Bldg 4 1-0R�0/�/ F,p/,s BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: To redevelop an existing service station on a 24,295 s'f Il construction includes a 11,000 sf bldg, four fuel dispensers, and three new 12,000 gallon fuel tanks. LOCATION: 301 South Grady Way SITE AREA: 24,295 sf (0.56 acres) BUILDING AREA (gross): 11,000 sf IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS: PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION, IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth 2. Air 3. Water 4. Plants 5. Animals 6. Energy&Natural Resources 7. Environmental Health 8. Land &Shoreline Use r 9. Housing 10. Aesthetics 11. Light&Glare 12. Recreation 13. Historic&Cultural Preservation • 14. Transportation 15. Public Services 16. Utilities ✓ COMMENTS: II( "PACT -re //IE Ex ' 17 v4 W4TTie rierre iti . (JO We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. 6.44,*1.1,14AT° Q_ 7 - fo Signature of Director or Authorized Representative 4S) Date Rev. 6/88 I DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF-096-90 - -APPLICATION NO(S).: CU 096 90 PROPONENT: Mark Cross PROJECT TITLE: Chevron Fueling Facility&Retail Bldg BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: To redevelop an existing service station on a 24,295 sf lot. Construction includes a 11,000 sf bldg,four fuel dispensers, and three new 12,000 gallon fuel tanks. LOCATION: 301 South Grady Way TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED TAC DATE: 9/21/90 ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION CURRENT PLANNING LONG RANGE PLANNING PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5:00 P.M. ON SEPTEMBER 10, 1990. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: PIA,* / PLA •v . 'few Ow x APPROVED k APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED ti•E w 1//t E Hrelf isti*V-r w I I. Need rip 0E 1# fr444 ED oAv wit sdvm s ore 6,e4dy w'S Y r' As Ee 0e,77 g Q v//t6 40 DATE: 7 7 -! 0 SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR A THORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 5/90 FEE APPLICATION: [DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET CENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET � PLAN REVIEW ROUTING SLIP OTHER • APPLICANT: orlaitsje, ,z1-444.14- . JOB ADDRESS: 3 �� NATURE OF WORK:eiAll: II PROPERTY MANAGEMENT C_ ld 4C DATE RECEIVED - Comments Due BY PgPERTY MGMT. "!_ 7-9i // ,...,) Comments or suggestions regarding this application should be in writin Please provide comments to the Comm. Dev. Dept. (C.D.D.) by 5:00 pr.m. ondabove date. . REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISIONA.4e—ri.a:( 4.A4.44.61— 1 ' �ES APPLIED CANNOT APPLY FEES `/ ,r4t#,-1 �`r � C] SQUARE FOOTAGE DIONCa,l..c,��til.0.✓ c74-talY IL 007 WORE INFORMATION O FRONT FOOTAGE .4 ' �"qi, 90� p VICINITY MAP It is the intent of t is development fee analysis to put the owner In notice, that the fees quoted below will apply to the subject site e upon d v l opmerr t of the property. All quoted fees are due and payable at the time the construction permit is issued to install the on-site and off-site improvements (i .e. underground utilities, street improvements, etc.) LATECOMER AGREEMENT - WATER PROJECT COST LATECOMER NO PER. FTG. FEE CITY HELD PRIVATE DEVELOPER HELD —'p LATECOMERS AGREEMENT - SEWER CITY HELD PRIVATE DEVELOPER HELD —'4 " p -- SPECIAL UTILITY CONNECTION CHARGE - WATER Single family residential dwelling unit $300/lot x UNITS SUCC FEE Apartment, Condo each multiplex unit $175/ea. unit x Commercial/Industrial $•/�sq. ft. of property x ��f;afs , / del, ��i* SPECIAL UTILI CONNECTION CHARGE - SEWER Single family r.s dential dwelling unit $300/lot x r Ito` Apartment, condo,, each mul i leX unit $175/ea. unit x �['dax Commercial/In• l ial $. s�.ft.cepao . of property x x�c � z' SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DI TRICT (Ho.pital Area) WATER ,�uCC/� J'�� ✓ DEVELOPMENTS WITH 150 GPM ITS SAD FEL FI, FLOWS OR LESS: Area Charge $0.0 , per sq.ft. x Frontage Charge $ . . 1d per front ft. .x DEVELOPMENTS WITH GREATE'•_ HAN 1500 GPM FIRE FLOWS: Area Charge $0.04: ' .r sq.ft. x Frontage Charge '18. '13 per front ft. x SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DI TRICT (Honey Crk. Interccpt, - SEWER UNITS SAD FEE AREA CHARGES: Residential dwel 'rig u its. apartments or equivalents; . 25 per dwelling unit x Commercial develop' : t: $.05 per sq.ft. of 'ross site area x FRONT FOOTAGE CHARGES: $37.19 per From, Ft. ,on ea. side) x $74.38 per fr/ft. (prot on both sides of imorv.) x 1 I _ 4.11sti.,":1'444:114-17A)• TOTAL: $ #3> OC�/.��I. The above quoted fees do NOT include spection fees,�i sewer permits, r w fees or the cost of water meters. / permi (II) aatf,a_ iii '� 0 UlI%Signature of Director or Authorized : • i ntative DATE ' �j� ' t DEPARTML 'iC OF PLANNING/BUILDING/PUS,:iC WORKS ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET onyopRbIvrssoN REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: T -1VP N1 �'a►vVA ArroAl ? 1990 DATE CIRCULATED: 8/27/90 COMMENTS DUE: 9/10 ~' 1' itu EFC-096-90 APPLICATION NO(S): CU-096-90 PROPONENT: Mark Cross PROJECT TITLE: Chevron Fueling Facility&Retail Bldg • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: To redevelop an existing service station on a 24,295 sf lot. Construction includes a 11,000 sf bldg, four fuel dispensers, and three new 12,000 gallon fuel tanks. LOCATION: 301 South Grady Way SITE AREA: 24,295 sf(0.56 acres) BUILDING AREA (gross): 11,000 sf IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS: PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT _ NECESSARY 1. Earth 2. Air \/ 3. Water 4. Plants 5. Animals 6. Energy& Natural Resources 7. Environmental Health 8. Land &Shoreline Use 9. Housing 10. Aesthetics 11. Light&Glare 12. Recreation 13. Historic&Cultural Preservation 14. Transportation 15. Public Services 16. Utilities n _n V+�L EL.,sn (1..�CA COMMENTS: 6D C .� c�, _ U�ti a� aR `mot '. RQt.� a�C�, �tZ� o ,. �.v✓� ,C:;1.L=-e 1,1 c tl.y....LeS). A-?) 44 144-) CL- ex....Lu.,crs.-(\,. - GVG6_Q ',!4' ff � � L�a3��r. k-' ' P" Z t! f-�-6"`(.� p fill.. lI L�2�t.L CD � � Q�(.C-�I �Q Q-I °° � '�.r�UA. lC `.c o "` \ We have reviewed this application with'particular attention to those areas in which-we-have'expertise and have identified' areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. At..trvt) I / 111qb Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date Rev. 6/88 tsb Ls._) • „•• �• t A ry f\ DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF-096-90 APPLICATION NO(S).: CU-096-90 PROPONENT: Mark Cross PROJECT TITLE: Chevron Fueling Facility&Retail Bldg BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: To redevelop an existing service station on a 24,295 sf II lot. Construction includes a 11,000 sf bldg, four fuel dispensers, and three new 12,000 gallon fuel tanks. LOCATION: 301 South Grady Way TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED TAC DATE: 9/21/90 ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION CURRENT PLANNING LONG RANGE PLANNING PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5:00 P.M. ON SEPTEMBER 10, 1990. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: CuYvej V a,�r1 APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED u 1 „ DATE: /G / 756 SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 5/90 DEPARTM''LaiT OF PLANNING/BUILDING/PU'-WC WO."• Ss-4.P ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET EGG l �pG1L 0 9�� , REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: < uut\��1e5 l���jC iQ�f� �0 � �� DATE CIRCULATED: 8/27/90 COMMENTS DUE: 9/1�e��s� EFC-096-90 P `CF �NNpl APPLICATION NO(S): CU-096-90 cm'O�Ro DIVIoN' PROPONENT: Mark Cross SEp 2 /990 fit': ... PROJECT TITLE: Chevron Fueling Facility&Retail Bldg VED BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: To redevelop an existing service station on a 24,295 sf lot. Construction includes/a 11,000 sf bldg, four fuel dispensers, and three new 12,000 gallon fuel tanks. LOCATION: 301 South Grady Way SITE AREA: 24,295 sf (0.56 acres) BUILDING AREA (gross): 11,000 sf IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS: PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth 2. Air 3. Water 4. Plants 5. Animals 'I 6. Energy& Natural Resources 7. Environmental Health 8. Land &Shoreline Use 9. Housing 10. Aesthetics 11. Light&Glare 12. Recreation 13. Historic&Cultural Preservation 14. Transportation 15. Public Services 16. Utilities f COMMENTS: 4 o • -041/OACT O N THE 6 s 7 iV4 5AN /r4A y $MNE,4 syfrE , We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date Ravi 6/88 _ .s F DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS 'DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF-096-90 APPLICATION NO(S).: CU-096-90 �I PROPONENT: Mark Cross • PROJECT TITLE: Chevron Fueling Facility&Retail Bldg BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: To redevelop an existing service station on a 24,295 sf lot. Construction includes a 11,000 sf bldg,four fuel dispensers, and three new 12,000 gallon fuel tanks. LOCATION: 301 South Grady Way TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED TAC DATE: 9/21/90 ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: • UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION. PLANNING DIVISION CURRENT PLANNING LONG RANGE PLANNING PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT • OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5:00 P.M. ON SEPTEMBER 10, 'I 1990. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: R w♦ Air /L J T /A4N IfeVw Y APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS X NOT APPROVED .Z71174&L,j Tee ti of S/Oe 786.# /L 70 /v w - âLOG , L a G 4710 N uv G �- - • H 14VEL To "ME (' ifti& c / V 0 F- geArrOtA, C e _f° / • ��' 0 47 DATE: 7 ` 7- 90 ., SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AU ORIZED REPRESENTATIVE III REV. 5/90 , , • DEPARTMcwT OF PLANNING/BUILDING/PUDIC WORKS ��4`' ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET o QGd •`�� n/i 'off " r, • eP��da�jO,c, 9l9 `�L� REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: S ry O DATE CIRCULATED: 8/27/90 COMMENTS DU9,C,/1O/�Q' ony opG arvisio i;(.2 EFC -096-90 NroNN Cx% SE RE P APPLICATION NO(S): CU-096-90 2 0 1990 I�,. PROPONENT: Mark Cross ECE k® PROJECT TITLE: Chevron Fueling Facility& Retail Bldg BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: To redevelop an existing service station on a 24,295 sf lot. Construction includes a 11,000 sf bldg, four fuel dispensers, and three new 12,000 gallon fuel tanks. LOCATION: 301 South Grady Way SITE AREA: 24,295 sf (0.56 acres) BUILDING AREA (gross): 11,000 sf IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS: PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth 2. Air 3. Water_ 4. Plants 5. Animals 6. Energy& Natural Resources 7. Environmental Health 8. Land &Shoreline Use 9. Housing 10. Aesthetics 11. Light &Glare 12. Recreation 13. Historic& Cultural Preservation 14. Transportation E" 15. Public Services 16. Utilities COMMENTS: Please see attachment We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Director or Authorized Representative lJ0. Date Rev. 6/88 SITE PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS CHEVRON FUELING FACILITY&RETAIL BLDG 301 S. GRADY WAY SEPTEMBER 18,1990 1) Six (6) foot side walk required length of property abutting to Grady way. Standard sidewalk detail plan required. 2) West property line needs access roadway and property line definition with defined entrance to site. Example landscaping or "c" curbing. 3) Show easterly exit. Proposed pavement arrow exiting at intersection to Grady appears to be pointing the wrong direction. 4) Location is located in a TBZ (Transportation Benefit zone). Transportation Benefit zone fee to be imposed on increase in projected trips generated above the existing facilities. A certified count by a traffic engineer of existing trips required to determine fee amount. Count is for 24 hour week day. 5) Provide information on how this project will fit into the proposed expension of the Renton Plaza Center. CEM301 • • • • • • • • • • a. • w DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF-096-90 APPLICATION NO(S).: CU-096-90 PROPONENT: Mark Cross PROJECT TITLE: Chevron Fueling Facility& Retail Bldg BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: To redevelop an existing service station on a 24,295 sf lot. Construction includes a 11,000 sf bldg, four fuel dispensers, and three new 12,000 gallon fuel tanks. LOCATION: 301 South Grady Way TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED TAC DATE: 9/21/90 ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION CURRENT PLANNING LONG RANGE PLANNING PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5:00 P.M. ON SEPTEMBER 10, 1990. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: 74zA'S'f' 2T/r'O/).( S°Sr7"/yS APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS K NOT APPROVED Please see attachment. u DATE: _ SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED PRESENTATIVE REV. 5/90 SITE PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS CHEVRON FUELING FACILITY&RETAIL BLDG 301 S. GRADY WAY SEPTEMBER 18,1990 1) Six (6) foot side walk required length of property abutting to Grady way. Standard sidewalk detail plan required. 2) West property line needs access roadway and property line definition with defined entrance to site. Example landscaping or "c" curbing. 3) Show easterly exit. Proposed pavement arrow exiting at intersection to Grady appears to be pointing the wrong direction. 4) Location is located in a TBZ (Transportation Benefit zone). Transportation Benefit zone fee to be imposed on increase in projected trips generated above the existing facilities. A certified count by a traffic engineer of existing trips required to determine fee amount. Count is for 24 hour week day. 5) Provide information on how this project will fit into the proposed expension of the Renton Plaza Center. CEM301 ! 'I I I f II • I • • • I • di `' = CITY OF RENTON miL Department of Planning/Building/Public Worlds Earl Clymer, Mayor Lynn Guttmann, Administrator August 27, 1990 • Mark Cross - Robert H. Lee&Assoc., Inc. 1520-140th Ave NE, Ste 200 Bellevue,WA 98005 SUBJECT: Chevron Fueling Facility&Retail Bldg CU;ECF-096-90 Dear Mr. Cross: The Development Services Division of the City of Renton has formally accepted the above-referenced application for preliminary review. It is tentatively scheduled for consideration by the Technical Advisory Committee on September 21, 1990. Within three days of that review, you will be notified that: 1) your application Is complete and has been ' scheduled for environmental review and determination, or 2) that additional information is required to continue processing your application for environmentai.review. Please contact me, at 235-2550, if you have any questions. - Sincerely, • • Mark Pywell Project Manager cc: Chevron USA, Inc. • 1301 -5th Ave, Room 2900 Seattle,WA 98101 accp111r/MP/kac 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2631 . `` � REIN:T•����N�� ��� ' �' � i;:;:.:.:• :::.,ass:::::s:::>:.;: 0 0 COMMUNITY.DEVEL .PMENT..DEPA.R ENT`<:� : �� � > ::�> ::�: <:�:; : :;:` ;;::i.`;.;>?> �':� ::;:::::::>:.;.1::::::>:< :::< ; :;:>::>:::::::::::::1:::: : :::::;:>:< :::::::: ASTER.APP.LI. ATI. .I>I......................................*::: .. ...................,............. • I. y:^ }`USI:N : :: : :::::::: < > :::::: : :::: :FEE. . .... :::::::::::>:«<;:>:::<::<::: :: ::>::»>:: O . E�..... ...................................... >TYPEO:F�AP:PLICATI:O:N. &.. .. S I NAME: _*REZONE $ Chevron USA Inc . _SPECIAL PERMIT $ . TEMPORARY PERMIT $ ADDRESS: , - 0 CONDrTIONAL USE PERMIT $ Fi 2 n oh_ 1301 5th Ave . Room 2900 _SITE PLAN APPROVAL $ ` SPECIAL PERMIT $_ CITY: ZIP: _GRADE&FILL PERMIT $ Seattle , Wa 98101 (No.CU.YDs: ) 1 _*VARIANCE $ 1 TELEPHONE NUMBER (2 0 6 ) 6 2 8-5 2 0 8 (FROM SECl'ION: ) _*WAIVER $ day H.ummel....... ROUTINE VEGETATION : GO•;,•••;ACT.;,:......,R,SONA :P..::,CANT.:::::::::: MANAGEMENT PERMIT $ 1 NAMi . a'rk., Cross (*JUSTIFICATION REQUIRED) 1 ' -ROBER.T H . LEE AASSOC . , INC . I ADDRESS: SUBDIVISION: $ 15 2 0 ,:14 O t h Ave . NE , S t e i:2 0 0 _LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT $ CITY: • • ZIP: _SHORT PLAT $ ' B.e.l•1'e v u e , W a . 98005 _TENTATIVE PLAT $ _PRELIMINARY PLAT $ TELEPHONE NUMBER (2 0 6 ) 7 4 6-4 6 7 7 _FINAL PLAT $ . NO.OF LOTS: • PLAT NAME: :: PR:OJECT:I:N:FO:RMATI:O:N :::::::::: ::: PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAME:• PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: $ Chevron Fueling Facility and • Retail Building _PRELIMINARY _FINAL PROPERTY/PROJECT ADDRESS(S)/LOCATION: 301 South Grady Way BINDING srrhPLAN: $ • KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER(S): MOBILE HOME PARKS: $ (DS1+ — o3 ,, _TENTATIVE EXISTING LAND USE(S): _PRELIMINARY _FINAL Service Station/Commercial PARK NAME: • EXISTING ZONING: NO.OF SPACES: B—1 'ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW $ 100 00 PROPOSED LAND USE(S): PROJECT VALUE: $ 400 ,000 . 00 SENSITIVE AREA: 0 Fueling Facility & Retail APA: _1 _2 _OTHER 412/0 Food Sales SEWER MORATORIUM AREA: YES OD— I PROPOSED ZONING: i • SAME • TOTAL FEES: $ 7 2 0 . 0 0 SIl'hAREA(SQ.FT.ORACREAGE): DATE PAID: ' 7 Q( POSTAGE PROVIDE : 6/1) NO 1 24 , 295 sq . ft :/ . 56 acres — • PLARa"G. :::::;:This::sectidn::�b::be::.com, lied;;b. :;Cit. stafE.>.•: :: . .:::.:..: ::::::::.::.::.�::::..:.�:::.:.:::.::: �:._: ::::::.�:.�::::..:::..:...::.�: ..:N. ...:::..:::.:..::.:.:.:...:::..::::::::::: ..: :.:.::.:.:..::.:.:::::.:. ::..:::..:: ..:::..: :..:::..:::::::..:::..::..::..::....::::::::::....: .. .::.::.. .T... :::. II::•::.Cit. :._..ile•.Num:i.,•:::.•: • .7..a • :-:::: ' :»>::`A: :R„::>: I3P:L:: >i>L;A: PP.»::r: •»::.* : : : >:�R:.': ' :»::»» ::>: ::>>»> >::: .:::: .... . ..::: ..:::::.::•:.::.::..:::..::•.•:.... :: : .:. v. .....W»>:.PUD:•::.;FPUD:> •:SM :::SME•<•>••;:YvIIH . :•:>F P•::::B P...... ..................... ..............:..:..:..:::. i x ...::... .....:..:. ... .......:.:.:...................:._.:....LEGAL::5:ES.C:R I:PT:I;O:.N :O:F P:R.. ...... . ....:. .. ..::: . ::.. ::...::..: . .:. :..:.. ....:..::......::.. ..:...:.:. :::: ::� : ::::: : : :> : : :>::> :::�:: : : :�2>mOre aco:i ::re cited�:: leaso::attaeh:2:se ar:�tg..S e ... ........ ............... . .. Legal Description for Chevron site at 301 S. Grady Way, Renton WA.98005.. Description: That portion of the Northwest 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 of Section 19, Township 23 North, Range 5 East W.M. , described as follows: ' Beginning at the North 1/4 corner of said section 19; thence Southerly along the West line of said Northeast 1/4, 1100.50 feet; thence North 77° 29 ' 03" East 554.30. feet; thence South 00° 31'47 ' ' East 51.26 feet to the Southerly margin of Grady Way - (S.S.H. No. 1-1) ,being the true point Of beginning; thence 'South 00° 31'47" East 150 feet; thence north 89° 28 ' 13" East to a point on the Westerly margin of an easement to the City of Seattle- Irecorded under recording No. 5687013 ; thence continuing North 89° 128 ' 15" East 1.58 feet; thence North 00° 31'47" west 181. 15 feet to 'the Southerly margin of Grady Way (S.S.H. No. 1-L) ; thence ;Southwesterly along said Southerly margin to the true point of beginning; , 'Situate in the City of Renton, County of King, State of Washington. I, J F. Nvv�►iN,e,\ , being duly sworn, declare that I am (please check one) �e authorized representative to act for the property owner,— the owner of the property involved in this application and that the foregoing , statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. 1. SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS j3 DAY OF lat,(C 19 G , 1 • • NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR THE STATE OF . WASHINGTON,RESIDING AT: (Name of Notary Public) �C�.� (Signature of Owner) 132c1 -l13`1 (Address) (Address) E W� Pi S 2 o 3 (City/State/Zip) (City/State/Zip) ( 2c &a -5364\ (Telephone) (Telephone) Acceptance of this application and required filing fee does not constitute a complete application. Plans and other material required to constitute a complete application are listed in the"Application Procedure." • i ,---- L • RtnMasEr 2/90 ,, PROJECT NARRATIVE FOR CHEVRON RETAIL AND FUELING FACILITY 301 South Grady Way 11 The proposal is to redevelop an existing service station on a 24,295 sq. ft. lot into a fueling facility and retail building. 11 The site has one hundred and fifty feet of frontage along South Grady Way. All construction will be new. The new construction includes a retail building of 1100 gross square feet along with four multi- product dispensers for retail fuel sales. Three new twelve thousand gallon fuel tanks will be installed as shown on the site plan. . The tanks and piping to the dispensers will be double walled. An advanced monitoring system will be installed between the walls of the tanks to warn of fuel leaks or water intrusion. j The building and dispensers are covered by an 18 foot high canopy 1 of 4, 140 square feet (45x92) . At the south end of the site, their applicant proposes a 176 square foot (22 by 8) utility building that will include storage and handicapped access designed '. restrooms. A fully screened dumpster enclosure is proposed for the southeast corner. Landscaping is proposed along the north and south sides of . the site. Access to the site will be from the east, west and south. Direct access to Grady Way does not exist and is not IF proposed. The driving surfaces will be asphalt. The area under the canopy ' and above the fuel tanks will be surfaced with concrete (see Site Plan) . A six foot wide concrete sidewalk will be installed at the back of the curb along the entire frontage of South Grady. One freestanding sign is proposed along Grady Way. The sign will be 28 feet two inches high and have a total size of one hundred ; sixty square feet on the two combined surfaces. . ���e Dwis►o" orri°V Re�roN 1 el 1990 eGCN . li I \ CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT JUSTIFICATION FOR CHEVRON RETAIL AND FUELING FACILITY AT 301 SOUTH GRADY WAY 1. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: The proposed Retail. Fuel and Food Sales uses are compatible with the general purpose, goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan specifically in the following ways: "Environmental Goal: To establish and maintain a harmonious relationship between the developed community and its natural environment" . We feel we meet this goal in that the proposal is to reuse an already developed site. Thus, limiting effects on the natural environment. Landscaping on the property involved will be increased from almost nothing to nearly ten percent. Safety for the environment will be enhanced by installing state of the art fuel storage tanks and monitoring equipment. We feel that the proposal meets the Environmental Policies due to the site being served by a major arterial. It is compatible with both existing and proposed adjacent commercial use. The cost of , providing this site with capital improvements is much lower than ' most undeveloped sites as the urban level infrastructure has already been extended to this site. The proposal meets the pollution objective by providing enhanced fuel storage and advanced fuel spill monitoring equipment. The proposal meets the open space objectives and policies in the following ways. The only vegetation removal being done is to make way for a sidewalk along Grady Way; which is being required by the City. Landscaping in excess of the minimum ten feet is proposed along Grady Way; in addition to landscaping on the south side of the site where currently none exists. The flooding and surface drainage goals and objectives are met by reducing runoff from the site by replacing existing asphalt with landscaping. The current impervious surface ratio is 100%. The proposal will replace 10% of that hard surface with landsca?n �y eoW�s'o° CIYY OF RERT(P! asery "90 "Economic Goal: To promote a sound, diversified economic base. " The economic goal is met, along with the economic objectives and policies in the following ways. The proposed use is a good fit; with the adjacent commercial uses of hotel, office building, movie! theater and a large new office building proposal. The provision of' fuel sales and limited retail food sales should limit trips fromd the adjacent uses onto the existing street grid. Retail sales of both food items and gasoline enhance the City'sl fiscal health through increased sales tax revenue. "Urban design goal: To promote aesthetic and functional harmony and to provide a proper balance of residential, commercial and industrial areas. " The landscape objectives and policies of the Urban Design Goal are', met by providing landscape areas with a minimum depth of 12 feetii and a maximum of 25 feet along Grady Way (two feet of the depth is ' on City Right of Way) , by providing landscaped areas around the dumpster enclosure and parking areas at the south end of the site in areas that currently do not have landscaping.. In addition, all 'I landscaped areas will be served by an irrigation system to insure ' long term survival and healthy growth. In reviewing the portions of the Comprehensive Plan related to Land ; Use Descriptions; we feel the proposed fueling facility and retail store meets the Commercial Landuse Description. The proposed used is compatible with "an area intended for retail activity" and the "adjacent to major arterials and near other nonresidential uses' should be greater than the scale of commercial activity permitted !' near more sensitive land uses" . For these reasons we feel that the g proposed retail use is a good fit and is compatible with the commercial uses of surrounding properties. ,I compatibility with the Zoning Code and other plans. All pertinent sections of the Zoning Code will be met in relation to building height, landscape requirements, and sign setbacks etc. II In most cases such as building heights, setbacks and landscaping the proposal exceeds the minimum and does not approach the maximum. �I Required improvements to Grady Way include the installation of a 6 foot wide sidewalk at the back of the curb. Access to the site is I gained from private internal easements. The current access to the site is relatively uncontrolled from the east, west and south. The current proposal will use landscaped areas with curbing to more carefully define these areas. A landscape plan or theme has not been adopted for this area. Therefor an analysis was done on landscaping of adjacent commercial! areas in developing the Landscape Plan to provide continuity with,, plant types of other new projects in the area. 2. COMMUNITY NEED: The proposal meets the need for a fueling facility in thel commercial area along with the incidental retail food items' proposed. Several fueling facilities in the area have been closed, in recent years. This area along Grady Way, east of Rainier Boulevard and north of Interstate 405 has an internal circulation' system that allows many commercial buildings and uses to access the, site without using Grady Way. In fact all of the users of the adjacent hotel, office buildings, the proposed office project: "Village Place North" : Ernst, Pay'N, Save and the movie theater will be able to access this site without having to use Grady Way. Due to the extensive amount of commercial, use in the surrounding area, there is a need for a fueling facility with food sales that is available without the necessity of vehicle trips onto Grady Way. 3. EFFECT ON ADJACENT PROPERTIES: The effect on adjacent properties will be positive. As before, fuel sales will continue which is a benefit to the hotel, office, building and movie theater patrons. Having limited food sales available should also be a convenience to users of these adjacent, commercial establishments. The loudest of the auto repair noise will actually be reduced by providing landscaping, formalizing the,, site circulation with new curbing; and providing a 6 foot wide) sidewalk along Grady Way which will enhance circulation safety. A. Lot Coverage: The lot coverage requirements of the B-1 Zone are met by the proposal.Building coverage allowed is 65% of the site. The proposal is to cover 25% of the site with buildings including the canopy (6, 000 approximate coverage of 24,295 sq. ft. site) . B. Yards: The B-1 Zone requires a 10 foot front yard setback. The canopy edge', sets 28 ' back from S. Grady Way. The only structure proposed extends six feet into the front yard setback. There are no other setback requirements for structures in the B-1 ' Zone. a C. Height: The zoning limit for this zone is 95 feet. The proposed buildin. will not exceed 18 feet; thus less than twenty five percent of the allowed height. The proposed free standing sign will be twentyeight feet tall and 150 square feet on both sides rather than the allowed two hundred and twentyfive square feet. 4. COMPATIBILITY: The proposed fueling facility and retail building will be, compatible with the adjacent commercial use. The adjacent uses which include a hotel, office building, movie theater and retail are uses that will not be harmed by the proposed activity. In fact the retail fuel sales should complement the neighboring uses and not interfere with their normal operation. Existing uses across Grady Way include a motorcycle sales facility!. and car sales. These uses will not be harmed by the proposed user and can actually be enhanced by the ease in availability of a; fueling facility. 5. PARKING: The Zoning Code calls for one space per 200 square feet of retail ; area, minus restrooms, hall ways, wall widths, etc. . Excluding these items leaves the building with a net retail area of 528 , square feet. In meeting the requirements, the site plan provides a handicapped parking space and two parallel spaces along the ' southern landscape area. Our experience with parking at facilities ' such as this is that the majority of the parking will occur at the fueling positions; whether fuel is purchased or not. Parking will be very adequate. 6. TRAFFIC: Traffic generated by a facility such as this is estimated to be in ', the range of 800 to 1200 Average Daily Trips with ten percent or 80 to 120 occurring during the afternoon peak. The majority of these trips will not be new trips. The existing service station and , fueling facility generates its own traffic. The site fronts onto Grady Way, but does not have direct access. Access is currently available to the site from the east, west and , south. See Neighborhood detail map. The current proposal is to retain access from the east, west and south but to more carefully define that access with additional curbing and landscaped area. 7 . NOISE AND GLARE: The noise generated by this site will be related to vehicles entering and exiting the site. Peak noise levels are expected to be reduced due to the elimination of auto repair equipment such as airhammers and other electrical repair tools. The area experiences relatively high background noise levels due to traffic volumes on Grady Way, Highway 167 and State Route 405. Additional noise generated at this site by increased traffic levels should be unmeasurable given the existing background noise level. 8. LANDSCAPING: The proposal is to landscape and fully irrigate an area along the entire length of Grady Way ranging in depth from 12 feet to twentyfive feet. Only 2 feet of this depth occurs on City Right of Way. In addition, the applicant proposes to landscape and irrigate two areas along the south property line. Please see landscape plan. Landscaping provided will substantially exceed the minimum standards set in the Zoning Code. 9. ACCESSORY USES: The proposal includes a utility building in the south west corner of the site. Half of this building will be storage and the other half will provide restrooms. The restrooms are designed to be handicapped accessible. In addition there will be an enclosed. dumpster and phone booth. The utility building is designed to be compatible with the sales building; both in material and color. 10.CONVERSION: All construction will be new. Building demolition and tank removal will be done to meet local, state and federal regulations. 11. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS: The proposal includes the provision of a 6 foot wide sidewalk along Grady Way. Landscaping will occur from back of the sidewalk to a point at least ten feet into the site. No new accesses are proposed. 1 Cam' 01(0-96 y Purpose of Checklist:- • The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), Chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probably significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. Instructions for Applicants: This environmental checklist ask you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies. ,use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise`ifofmati-an known, or give the best description you can. You must answer-each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply". Complete answers to. the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If. you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time- or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit.this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impacts. Use of Checklist for Nonproject Proposals: (PIease Type or Print Legibly) Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply". IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D). For nonproject actions (actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs), the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Chevron Fueling facility and Retail Store 2. Name of applicant: Chevron USA , Inc . og 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: U ay Hummel :f 2 0 6 ) 6 2 8-5 2-8-4- Chevron USA , Inc . 1301 5th Ave . Room 2900 Seattle , Wa . 98101 4. Date checklist prepared: PLANNING DIVISION 8/10/9 0 5. Agency requesting checklist: CITY OF RtCNroN City of Renton AUG 1 71990 g/ ,� .*ECE Q�Qfj�, ED 1 -2- 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Construction beginning June 1991 . Construction will last approximately 50 days . 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansions, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. NO . List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. NO 10. List any governmental approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. Grading permit , building permit , and health department for food sales . 11. Give brief, complete description .of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those' answers on this page. The site contains 24 ,295 sq . ft . . The proposal includes a retail sales building of 1 ; 100 gross sq . ft . and four retail fuel dispen- sers . In addition there is a 172 sq . ft . utility building that * 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topography map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. The street address is 301 South Grady Way . The site is located ' on the south side of Grady Way immediately to the east of the Holiday Inn (just east of SR167 ) . B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site (circle one flat ] rolling, hill steep, slopes, P ){ � g� y� P� mountainous, other b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope?) 1 - 3% c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, scaly, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. Soil Type unknown , because the site is virtually covered by buildings , concrete and asphalt . No known agriculture in the area . d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. NO .* provides. storage and two handicapped access designed restrooms . -3- e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. Minor amounts , less than 10 cubic yards for landscaping areas . f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. The site is so flat there is very little change of erosion . g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? 90% of site will be covered by impervious surfaces . Currently the site is 100% impervious . h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: Hay bales to be placed at existing storm drains . 2. AIR a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Dust will be generated during construction . During normal operation after construciton there should not be any * b. Are there any off-site sources of emission? Yes , SR405 , SR167 and South Grady Way . c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: Clean debris trucks on outside prior to leaving the sit 3. WATER a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. NO 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available, plans. NO 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. NONE 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. NO 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on fie site plan. NO 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. Discharges should be similar to normal street runoff . Runoff from site will improve due to elimination of auto servicing and repair . * significant dust generated . -4- b. Ground: ' 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. NO 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. Ir. NONE c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters, If so, describe. Storm water is anticipated from buildings , canopy and paved area . 2) Could waste material enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. No . Oil water separators to City . Standards will be used prior to discharge to storm system. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: NO J 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: NO deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other NO evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other x [shrubs] N 0 grass N O crop or grain NO wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other N O water plants: water lily, eel grass, milfoil, other NO other types of vegetation Current landscaping is in city right of way ;or off site . b. What kind and amount of vegetation will De removed or altered. ed. Sidewalk requirement mandates removal of first 6 feet of vegetation from back of curb . c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. { NONE d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measure to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: Landscaping proposed will be at least 10 ft . deep along South Grady Way up to 25 ft deep . Part of 'south property line will be landscaped 4 ' to 8 ' deep . 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: Birds: hawk, heron, eagle,[songbirds,]other Crow Mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other Fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other -5- b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. NONE c. Is the site part of .a migration route? If so, explain NO • d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: NONE 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, wood,, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Electricity will be used for heating , lighting , refriger- ation , and pumping gasoline . b. . Would your project •affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. NO c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this, proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: Insulation of building , insulation of hot water tank to state energy standards . 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. Yes , there is some chance of spill of gasoline . 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. Fire department and Hazardous material team. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: There are several measures planned to reduce chances of a fuel spill . All tanks &.. fuel piping will all be double walled . Electronic monitor system to sound alarm if fuel leaks to * b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the areas which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? There is considerable background traffic noise but this will not conflict with proposed use . 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Noise generated by proposal should be similar or less due to elimination of air hammers & other noisey auo repair 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: activity . 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Current use is fueling facility and .auto servicing . Adjacent land is hotel , office and undeveloped . b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. Current automobile service station dates back at least 25 years 'or more . *inner tank lining . . If -6- c. Describe any structures -o on the site. / r,, d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? /g5 Gr tl e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Commercial g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Not Applicable h. Has any part of the site been, classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area?, If so, specify. NO i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? i One or Two persons . j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? NONE k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: 1 .' Landscaping of areas previously paved . 2 . Curbs to define adjacent private roads & controll access better. 9! Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. NONE b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether, high, middle, or low-income housing. NONE c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: NONE • 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; ' what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed. Freestanding sign will be 28 ' - 2 " the canopy will be 18" - b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? NONE c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: Landscaping , screening of dumpster and building setbacks larger than minimum , additional landscaping well above minimum required . 11. Light and Glare V ' • . , , 11 ' ` ' l a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would . - j it mainly occur? ' 1. ';, Glare will ,be minimal because the canopy will shade most glass areas . -Lighting will come from directed light poles., I & internally lighted spanner between .dispensers . b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere , with views? 1;' NOil I,I c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? . ,i NONE i I, ill d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: 11 Use of modern fixtures under canopy & on light 'poles wilV • reduce off site light and glare . lu 12. Recreation I a. . What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? Not aware .of any . . b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, h - describe. . NO '9 . c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on' recreation, including recreation opportunities to bel provided by the project or applicant, if any: ;' • di NONE i l . sII • 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation . • ill • II a. ' Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally . • describe. • • ; , Il•' NONE . b. Generally describe any landmarks • or evidence of historic, archaeological, • scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site• ., i i, NONE Ir, • Ii c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: '° • NONE i 11, d ;. 6 j . I, 1 'III 1 . • 14. Transportation • a. ' Identify .public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed, access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. • Project has 150 ' :.;of , fronta•ge on Grady 14ay . However; all . access .is from adjacent private roads to east , west , & south . b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate' distance to the nearest transit stop? . No ,bbus stop on Grady Way , on this site or adjacent parcels . c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? 3 spaces including one full sized handicapped space . d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private? I understand from Clint" i.hPublic Works that a 6'' wide concrete , sidewalk will be required . We show this on plains . e. 1 Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water,• rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. NO f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. 8_00 - d1 ,200 ADT PM' peak 80 - 120 g. 1 ; ropose measures to reduce or controltransportation impacts, if any: Use planters & new curbing to control access points . Install sidewalk on Grady; Way to enhance pedestrian movement . 15. Public Services . 1 a. Would the result in an increased need for project public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. ,, { Small increase in fire & police services . However , new construction & security p 'ocedures along with new double walled tanks combined should mitigate impact on services . ' b. ; " Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. 1" 1. New building cons;tructipn :'& security procedures . New double walled: 'tanks; & fuel 'phi pi ng. 3 . Increase in retail sales tax to .jurisdiction . 16. Utilities a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: [electricity,] [natural gas] [water, ]' [refuse service],[tclephone]ganitary sewer,]septic system, other. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the' project, the utility providing the service, 'ands the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate • vicinity which might be needed. ,, Electricity is provided by Puget Power . Natural gas is provided by Washington Natural Ga•s .,T Water & sewer is provided by City -of Renton . Telephone is provided by US. West .' Refuse• service provi der' i s unknown . All are available to site no new work is expected. off site . There , is some potential that a larger water meter maybe requested but that is still under consideration . ' -9- • C. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of, non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of ful disclosure on my part. • Proponent: Name Printed: F VIM[Mc/ ` E 1. • 1.1 _10_ _ D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (This sheet should only be used for actions involving decisions on policies, plans and, programs. Do not use this sheet for project actions.) Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. • When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms. 1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: 2. How would the proposal be Iikely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life? 1 Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life. are: 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or. areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic on cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? Proposed measures to protect such. resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? i . CHEVRON FUELING FF^''*_ITY & CARWASH �I! CONDITIONAL USE PEA, T - i il TYPICAL LIGHTING F %TURE Fa n oto m et r i c Data li ( CITATION SERIES ., MODEL: CTM-FT-400-SMH-F ._ LAMP: 400W SUPER METAL HALIDE '' DISTRIBUTION: FT-FORWARD THROW �-._ : l °c0'' LENS: FLAT GLASS - I :='ORT: ITL32413 (411110 - 4MH DOUBLE • IdI - 3MH 1'I, III 2MH 11 1MH I„ ;///1 -° :(7i1- :7;\) g 11 tte14/ 1MHI! K., c/ 2MH E f F • _ / I' 3MH �....F FRONT �c 4MH 3MH 2MH 1MH 0 1MH 2MH 3MH 4MH 3MH 2MH 1MH 0 1MH 2MH 3MH 4MH it Mounting Configuration Foot Candle Values For The Following Curves Height A B C D E F G 16! . . Single•.. . :' " 15.63 7.81 - • 3.18:,5,-.y.=1:56- 78:•':;;:.-:31 :;,.::?':l.6-;_.;,-'. r ' a..cvr ..e...._. a..e .1a,... 18' Single 12.35 6.17 2.47 1.23 .62 .25 .12 Double 24.69 12.35 6.17 2.47 1.23 .62 .25 ' 20, . .. :Single. .- 10.00 . .•5.00- .2:00:`:,, r;1 00. _ ....50"....,c`:,:':`20 ::; u i1'0 ' Double':" ':- • 20.00 '10.00 .'5.00 > ° 2:00•:', °.11.00-:",'`- 50=.*=3',k20'i%>i`: 22' Single 8.26 4.13 1.65 " .83 .41 .17 .08 ll Double 16.53 8.26 4.13 1.65 .83 .41 .17 ..24, . .-Single. 6.94 .3.47.° 1:39 :: :..69; ..�.. .. }.:, �,.= ,' .,:','.Double ; • 13.89 .. -6.94�,.. 3.47•:.z y .1:39 ,z°.":i 69:";:1. 35;a:F :a4.. .:;:: 26' Single 5.92 2.96 1.18 .59 .30 .12 .06 Double 11.83 5.92 2.96 1.18 .59 .30 .12 :Single r- - 5.10' :_-s,2:55 = ",'1:02:=:L"•..,:,rJ ra<;:: ;,�:.�.::y ri :2gh«.. 51,. _'ti':26 '" a , 10',f•: • .p5: <t;: .. . ..: .: --. .Double. .E , .. • 10.20 ,,• 5 _ 2 5:10' 2:55:> .;102 s: -=i 1;. *r:rti > ., ,, 30'._ Single 4.44 2.22' .89 .44 .22 .09 ' .04 1 Double 8.89 4.44 2.22 .89 .44 .22 .09 MH-Mounting Height • ' NMI s16ems IIIC. P.O.BOX 42728 • CINCINNATI,OH 45242 • FAX 513-793-0147• (513)793-3200 LSI CTMB-REV 6/99 ©1989 LSI Lighting Systems Inc. Printed in the U.SIA. //!'-�_ ice`/I � ,.____....... ,10:-. • t • • S • • 568'7013 • p g A a = = N : 4493 Aact2ei7 • POOH THIS ERGOTISM madem da this 13th day of Jsusuer•• o POWER i LIG w.; •.'._. i 1964, between Grantor• and the CITY OP SEATIZg sa pal C eras- 'sees• rssina cite: called the .(1 ' ' ,, ' Grantee, WITNESSETHs I municipal corporation, hereinafter celled the That the Oranbor, for and in consideration of the sum of o Hundred and fifty 4 2b CO Dollars ($250.00) and other valuable considerations, receipt of which is hereby • t•• 1-'•° knowledged, hereby conveys and grants to the Orantee, its successors and assigns,c • T� the rights privilege and authority to alter, electric transmission lines, consisting of to improve, as repairs operate to maintain • or suspend transmission and ,!Seal wires insulator',canow located, and to place upon i ent appurtenances, across, over and upon the followigadescribed laner dsaaanndor premises 4 situated in the County of KING, State of Washington, to-wits • Pramimas • A strip of land 350 feet in width in that NW 1/4 of the Ng 1/4 of Section 19, Township 23 portionorth 5 of the 8 East, of the • • in Ping County, Washington, which lies southerly of the south line Secondary State Highway No. 1-L described as follows: •7 Belane +' at the north quarter.corner of Section 19. Township 23 ` • g ng • North, Range 5 East, N.M.; thence southerly along tha West line of the NZt of said Section 19, a distance of 1100.50 feet to the center line • • •• of Secondary State Highway 1-L (Grady Way); thence northeasterly along said canter line being on • bear! o • " ° • thence South 0°31'47' East, 51.11nfeet to the Southmargintof7said9Second- ary State Highway No. 1-L (Grady Way), being the true point of beginning; thence North 77°29'03" East, 349.62 feet to the P.C. of a curve to the left; thence on said curve to the left a distance of 8.18 feet, said curve having a radius of 3820.00; thence South 0°31'47" East. 412.49 feet to • o the South line of the NW} of NE}; thence along said South line North 89° �Y 44 31 Vat, 350.03 feet; thence North 0°31'47" West, 333.77 feet to the . true point of beginning. ^ : • Together with the right at all times to the Grantee, its successors and assigns, of ingress to ogress from said lands across adjacent lands of the Grantor for the Purpose of • reconstructing, repairing, renewing, altering, changing, patrolling and operating said line, and the right at any time to remove said towers . and poles, wires and appurtenances from maid lands. • Also the further right to clear said right of way and keep the same clear of brush,timber and all fire hasardm and the right to remove danger trees, if any, lo- cated beyond the limit o paid easement area, which by falling would endanger the transmission lines. The C , his iuccesmor■ or assigns shall not place, any building or other structure within the boundary construct or maintain The City of Seattle is to be responsible, a limits of said strip of land. •' resulting to the Grantor through it; ns 1 provided by law, for any damages operation of said transmission �• fence in the overandacre construction, maintenance and of said Grantor. lines and across the property • - The Grantor, its heirs. successors or assigns. covenant and agree that it will not do any blasting or discharge any explosives within • distance of three hundred • . (300) feet of maid line without giving reasonable notice in writing to the Grantee, its successors or assigns, of intention so to do. The rights, title, privileges and authorityhereb be in force until such time as the Grantee, its uccessor, or assigns, shally granted shallnue permaa • & nently remove said towers and • • ,d shall otherwise pe pO m• fires and appurtenances from paid lands, or • "��" peivileges and�u�p n said lines, at which time all such rights, title, • IN WiITIE�g ' "''granted shall terminate. �s . !s instrument has been executed ... • • • above written. • the day and year first e � t J • f+"'• PUCEI SOUND POWER i LIGHT COMPANY . • ►� "�' Vice President - Operation. • ' rourY v TT� a ' p. • - ': • rt •---- - �_ . . . . . YOL..... • rt.•. y Ye o ., tr xl w ��p.•..,. A 7 bo •-. •-• as p., v I•.. w 0 .0! • . ,, all .° p a ; v - 0 l � o : ' v ox wl U :• W • V W • . a r7i at w a. • ' FILED for Record'at Requitst of ___ - • . Rddrtst... .1.1 w - • • _ . . •• •a 1 ii sl ----__.- • • �1 oT14sgB aw tuTPTsei • J . le, I ., ,1 . • uosBu3gswit fo 'swag •q= so; Pas uT oT :A• ' �r Twee tsTaST3o s 'missy,' swags as'L Pas L*p sqs PsxTll Pas putt' AU ass Oaan•s•li swag I 'accusal SXXXXIM XI • •` • • •susm►sssu; PTgs 'snows' os p•ujsogsns *see LWa sags pesos@ gswo ao gave • pus tM+aTsasm aT•ssps tstodsnd Pas soon gqs soy !a°Tissgdsoo PTss.)o peep pus. soli_ Lsssuntow pas DOA; rqs sq os su�ssouT PTW. itgs p,IQlsTaaa.a. gags pa! •sasansatuT • • faTofuol Pas uTgapi sqa pganoIx. iggs aoTassodsoo•tiga'To •Lsss•so•11•Iawat1t'Y - . . 40spT6osd sit/ •qs•'q os ut�om4 S as t. Ij it y •!! •j,pas • . 'seep/sex,/ • i)TA oqs sq os 011004 50 oa , OTT * �'L' pssssddw • AT/massed es •:o,Tpq 'fe6T "cry t Aisfsstll` .=0 Amp um uO • • • °• ( AO LIJtfl00 • (miessaniacev • . •• sob • n / .- t k 4:'•! r n 1 `\•ty• tt , f'•4, ♦t.,,,..A, _ •� _•. v' ea • • --- - --• . _ . • — - . - -- _. - • _ .; f].?W•51:-7:-‘,, . : :•-:;,1•"!:. c' • „ . ., ,. .• • ..._, '•. . • • • • ... -- • '..-. , , . • ' • - -- -• - - -- '*•. . •. .. - • . . . . .„. . NAME • • •- - ADDRESS , ASSESSOR'S PARCEL• NUMBER . , • , • , . • • • ,• _ - . - . . • .. . ... . . . ,. . • . . , _.. _ .. . . . . , • • - - ' • . '.- • ,, • . ,-- .. „ , . • . . . . . - .. : . • . •• .. • ... ..-• • • •..- "" -- • , . . -- • • .. - ... . . -..... • , ,. . . ., . . .. .. . . .. .. . . ..- • ' .:• • . • , .. .. _ _. . . Certification . .. • • • • • I, /4'1 -1 ereby certify that the above list(s) of adjacent property owners and their addresses were taken from the records of the King County Assessor as prescribed by law,. • ... - • ._ . .,.. . . . . , ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a Notary • - = • - , . • Public, lin and for the State of Washington residing at \\ ._k....lo...?-r . on the 1 '----. day of . --- • „ ..,- • . . -ki.,sc i%t cc•(6 • - - • . . • ' Signed: ' id W.-->,( •,• -.. ••., ... .,, , . . ... .- . . . • - ,. • ' • .. . .„. ''' '' ''••::••••:':':::::::*" •-::::'::•" •••?:E••••• " i•••••• ::.. • •••:•:• ]... :••••: • •:•:•'1;i'::•:,•:.i:.:•:•••: .:-;-.:.:.'s:•::•::•.. ...:.. : .::. :::;•..s::: .•;...ii:!:•':**::::..:0:,::::::'•,::! , ••••••''• •...*:;44•••orli"".F.or.:•bi-fiC.61.1.ee:Ofili.l.q5.#.*. ..*.::::::.::•:•• • •• .•::::::•:..-::.: : .: .-:..:••••::!;.•,:::.: • .•••.:.........::::.::::::E:Ei: • •: • - •:•:.::::•:::::,...... .:-::•:.:::::. • -...i:::::::•::: . .::. . :•.i.:•::•:.•:.::::::::::::::,.:, • :.••:,...::::::-. ..:. ..: .'..'-:. :-...:••::.• --:••••::•.- •-..-.'0.Eflt:IFICATION.Fpi.z.(.-NIN.4iNq, ..-. '-•:-.::.• - . :.... ::-.•;,:•;:..ii:.. • -i••••• • • • •• .: .•:.. .,. .... -.., .. ....„:..:•........: •:-..: ..•:. .... ..._ b,....4:: ".1.i•• ril1 levi.u..6 PYD 4.--+ 1,. „ .....::::.:.::' •:. t.::...::. • ,... , :S.:. .. .::.... ... hereb .: :er-0.......:!'.:th .t.;:.:.:r.i.Otip. . . §::::Of." :..-:.:.:.,•:,...:.,:... -.....:•mopting::.:..:,:....:.....•:•,..,,,..,•:.:.:..-.-.:.,,...r rn-t\-cueil .... • • -.....• •r. .. ......appro &,.• ere mailed on. . .. t 30. 90..,..:.:.:.:.:.;..:....,.......... , ..,::.;:it. ea.6.f.iliod:.:::::6d14.6. 6t,!:!. ::.:.:..,:pisi:.;e: i.:ii.i.i.:...6 ,:i.'i.ii.o.:r:•:::415:i'.6. crib.6!':::i..:•.6y10:..'.• -.: :. •,..0. 4,.„; . ... .::•..: ... . ..... i..-- • :-:::::::-:::::::.:.:.:...::: .•....: :.::.2-:-.::::....:.., :. .-....,..-..?...:..... . ..,. . 07'1,,,Pi •1.Ji;it...:'•'4%'.4 •''......: : -. • .:::.:*:::.i:i...... :•::.•':::.•:.....:. • ::..:.::•••••:...::.....:•:::..:•.;: :.A'..r.17: $1'.:.::::•Stib$cr Subscribed.and• w oto.: 0:-0efpr..p... 44 .if.z.•.,..;55 . . ,..<7 0 :......• . .•.::.... . .: . ,.•.. .:: :. ..::.::..:..::.: : ::: -.••:..::.:::•:::••:::::i*:•:.:...:.-••i 0•:•:;..:::::.:aL::Ni•:•:•::.O:•:•:t•i:a••:.::t:.•:ii•:.•2::.•:P•...•U:.•...i...O.:.:,.J.i•:I O:•••'••i:••.••.••.. .• -...:.:.:..:...•::::.•....,::::g:•.:..:: .:...:H.:.:.-:•::.:•.:'s•:-s`:I ,7.•,.°_., .......,....:'.'..'..::.....;c;-.'..,7.rl•0.2TA, :' .:..:.. ...,:••••••:•::.•:,i:.i..,:... .....i... Ya$1llgtOT.iOPIPIhb[at • • : ) NOTAR' .....::::..::.:.,.....:..:. •.::..........:,:.•...,...::.:.::::::.::::....,:.:...-. 1: :.:-..1,i;..:•: .... ..i..••,.:...;: ::•... ...:.,..•-::: :::::::::::::-:.:..:..,...-:: ::::..s.::::•,,:;: . :,.: •::::::::...•':.6. .:861:..6.4 .6f::.: . .•'-: ..-•:.:•• •• . ..ti.y f.kcp. .k, .: PUE3V4. • 'i::,z...... :al.:.-....'. ..;.,:..::W..;• ..,:::•:.: ...;;:::.. ...•:.•:•:•::•:•::::::!!:.':.::::::.: :i..: .. .. .. . . . : :- .. . - - - 1, A%ve/A, • • ,,P.P°A9 z ... . .... ..- .. . . - - " - • ."• - .• . . .. . . . .. . -0,• • •••• • " - ... ('% -ve •::'1/4 7.0' •••...4a:.::..:. :::...: •••::.•:. '11.i.'...::-.:: • ::•:••:.:•-•.•:•::.:•:•:::A:! :*.i'.:•:::..:.:::.:..•..::.:.• .. '...•...,;t4 L'a( - ...•••••• • • - ..- •... .--.. ...-••••••• ... .. . . .. .. . " .. . - • ' ' .".• - . ::...•:•::..:•:::::••••: ::: .:i.•:•.:. .:: ::.j... . . :.: :.:: . ..•:...••••••.: :..• .....ae80"momot . .. .....•.. . .. ..:.•... .. •• .....-.... ....:•••.:.:,:•:.: ..— - •-• • .: •.':. . .' 1:0,y. ' WAS\C 0.4 • . • ' • . i• • . . . I Rev 5/90 • • - ' CERTIFIC.doc • • • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .......... ... ; ; ; .; . ..... . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .. .. . . . . .. ........ . .. . . . . . . . . . . • DEPARTMENT OF COMtflIT DEVELOPMp CERTIFICATION OF NOTIFICATION OF PROPERTY OWNERS within 300 feet Of the subject site - • ***FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY*** 1PROJECT TITLE: &661//fOY/ • ;APPLICANT: Mark-. c2ver---% ;APPLICATION NUMBER: CU - E44c. The following is a list of property owners within 300 feet of the Isubject site. The Community Development Department will notify ithese individuals of the proposed development. NAME ADDRESS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER Fred H Knack 263 Rainier Ave S. Ste 204 9063-02 Renton, Wa. 98055 tni7i; I. z, /4. ,i601,1,13.1.41tpr,49 "-Inc. 750 Rainier Ave S. 9035-07 Renton, Wa. 98055 • -R,02.1talf-VAI]iiage 800 5th Ave #3500 1625-08 Seattle, Wa. 98104 DAItt;i5101;:it+Qpil)..f:' 800 Rainier Ave. S. 1630-01 - Renton, Wa. 98055 Renton Village 607 3rd Ave. #315 9043-07 Associates Seattle, Wa. 98104 • Chevron USA, Inc. 1301 5th Ave. Roam 2900 ATTN: Jay Hummel Seattle, Wa. 98101 I Is ' •:.` Chevron USA, Inc. P.O. Box 7611 ‘ • .: 9054-03 Property Taxes San Francisco Ca. 94105 PUWNWGDWMION CITY OF RENTON -• AUG 1 7 30 RECLi „., . / PLANNING ZONING FEES NAME; roll i eRuJEcr; '- 30/ /l r � ' Annexation Fees 000/000/345'81'00'02 ' Appeals & Waivers 000/000/345'8I'00'03 . ' Binding Site Plan/Short Plat /000/000/345'8I'0.0'04 Comprehensive Plan Buoeudoeo± 000/000/345'8I'00'05 Conditional Use Fees 000/000/345'81'00'06 (�qg()'/71 . Environmental Review Fees 000/000/345'8I'00'07. Preliminary Plat 000/000/345'81'00'08 50% Final eIa± (General Fund) 000/000/345'81'00'09 SO% Final Plat (Park Fund) I0I/000/345'81'00'00 Final/Preliminary PDo 000/000/345'8I'00'I0 ' Grading & Filling Fees 000/000/345'81'00'11 Lot Line Adjustment 000/000/345,81.00'I2 � Mobile Home Parks 000/000/345'81'00'I3 Rezone 000/000/345'81,00'14 Routine Vegetation agmt. Fees 000/000/345'81'00'15 / Shoreline Substantial oev Fees 000/000/345'8I'00'I6 Site Plan Approval 000/000/345'81'00'I7 Special/Temporary Review Fees 000/000/345'8I'00'I8 Variance Fees 000/000/345,81,00,I9 , other aioc Planning/Zoning Fees 000/000/345'81'00'20 ` . � Maps 000/000/34I'50'00'00 704I Photo Copies 000/000/341'60'00'24 , Publications 000/000/34I'60,00,24 Postage 000/000/05/5I9/90'42'0I 7055 Sales Tax 000/000/231'70,00,00 9998.| ' BY: DATE: � DUPPLICATE REC:EIPT_DUPLIC:ATE RECEIPT ^— ON CITY OF REHTOU CI1Y TREASURER REG/RCPI 02-1fl 6 08-17--I99l CASHIER ID . G 11 y' 8000 MISCELLANEOUS RE °�� m ar 20.00 CONDITIONAL USE FEES 000.IIIIfl i00. ;45.81.ilil°i1111111116 ttl.ili_I a3i+iU1 MISCELLANEOUS RE • ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW EES 0011.000.00.345.81.00.n00007-- __ TO I AL DUE r $720.1IC1 RECEIVE D FROM: CHEVEROH USA CHECK as720.0i,4 TOTAL TENDERED $720.i{i i . CHANGE DUE $0.00 DUPLICATE RECEIPT DUPLICATE RECEIPT HALLMARK FUELING AREA The distinctive Hallmark fueling area answers customers' needs for clear direction to fueling points, product identification, pump oper- ating directions and clean, easy to use product dispensers. The contemporary design of this FUh' Ch fueling area with its slim-line col- Aka 5 Turm7En9me mg umns, communicates simplicity and efficiency while integrating appro- priate informational signs, night- .. .U time security lighting, a waste and CLEAN CLEAN Fsm°OMs windshield valet, and most impor- RESTROOMS tantly, multiproduct dispensers 1;111• offering all fuel products at each l fueling position. 4. 1° _ CANOPY GRAPHICS Chevron's voice to our customers is carried in our Chevron wordmark and Hallmark symbol. The clean, simple and straightforward design speaks clearly about our leadership position in the industry and in your community. The locations and proportions of these internally illuminated graphic AA elements on our canopy have been illeOtir°r1 carefully studied to provide impor- te taut mid-range facility identification S . - . . . ' for motorists. y .11 (I-_ THE HALLMARK CONCEPT From the ground up, Chevron's Hallmark station has been designed with your community in mind. The simple architecture, open layout, neutral building colors, natural aa• � oq <d � .. " Pen ag d 4 materials and graphics have been $ ai ,�0 .,up�� , °°a;n ' .;,+ ki'. a ��d :::1Y::: r and functional a, X� ,�y Chevron needs. The clear identification of ' "" • iiiiChevron o-.,11W services, amenities, product offer v'' '�;� isx A• ""' ": �=tm at�s `a�w .ai '• 7s 'j' 11a ings and prices has been highly inte- r• 4, .. . es Y' Food Mart , t IIIIIII ' grated to communicate a controlled ` �- , lt, / ��. a and consistent message. loom . i — of �''�' 111 tr _4 I, I',Alai 1 1r i ►•c Ilk" , :',. . 4 7 0 8 pc �d q � -s -..-�.- ,. ... - m. FOOD MART Ancillary business such as Chevron's Food Mart are important services to your community and they are important to Chevron. Therefore, it is essential that the Food Mart service building be inte- grated with our Hallmark philoso- phy of offering the highest quality products and customer services. The Hallmark building style is ,.,,�____-__ extended to the Food Mart building �4hr _ yvd Mart by using appropriate materials, neu- a_ �-,..m. .�..�H. tral colors and architectural details which are consistent with the Hallmark canopy and fueling areas. ��' — �. Attractive signing is limited to only IIII 4 the minimum required to adequate- ly identify our branded services and provide customer information while strict guidelines control the appli- cation of merchandising materials. IDENTITY SIGN The identity sign is a key element in Chevron's Hallmark program. It has been designed to provide clear and consistent communication of ', Chet, the Chevron brand, ancillary ser- .• 10� vices (such as Food Mart) and product prices. To eliminate visual clutter and allow for safer, long-range recognition Food Maw by motorists, the identity elements �asu�IAe Self Serve are surrounded by a gray field and pUEADEDA 9 supported by a contemporary ■O O10 AEGUTA q structure. A modular system � uNiEaoeo O,009 10 for displaying these messages en SUPREM E O O 0 9 UMFADEU ■ lO sures clean and consistent communication. Also, due to the coordinated look of the Hallmark system, the need for high-square footage signs is minimized. WIDTH HEIGHT OVERALL SQ. FT. 5' 7" 12'8" 70.8 THE HALLMARK CONCEPT From the ground up, Chevron's Hallmark station has been designed ' with your community in mind. The , k simple architecture, open layout, ..f ft neutral building colors, materials 41 and graphics have been carefully „R$‘14a at 44, +�°� ;»°�'.. • ,;. ` 4�,g�{� a, . n -r•4 Ma� ns M9 selected to meet our customers'aes- r 3 C e �°; dr6Ve { ` � ._',' . t'r 4 7+ Nr thetic : t ::::i°::o ::vi:: d f ne . -" f,, �� ,, � F. ,;•„y P z,..,fs Chevron -,, clear , ,pit J �511'*: ��' li r:�hK� ^' .r,-„i✓T+�y{ 9$ rx;' ;-s amenities, product offerings and , — r x wa.+w�r•:E.w�:�.w_ re t..,rk_.,�a . ;�a� prices has been highly integrated �' _VIIIII Food Mart —,._. a to communicate a controlled and 'F �,'' d consistent message. MINIM 41 %f avd _ a az , 411445i ` erg,, ,. '' 7. OQ , F_6,pe _T ye' .Q ,s.�, tvY d� � ;7,ah10 a s111•=7 — r . w . • 1.S is i. w i!r �a • _ Jar f— y -9"I-1 .da216 -2-c -9rr ~ ' l . WW1 TIM ,its n —. 1p-0 19r+'r"a .Ry frI�J1 I' i Qin/ 4 r. - Ai 'ticifjA�'i.,1 . ' r h N-s OD 1` L F-. L FIL - e740„.... Sr "OW �� ,a • 4 '---.4.1 .• - 1 1 . - 45312 1k5 NI5 am -A II'''. -. 1 MIIIIVA L N -11. TT�dV1V `4, %I/alI �.ws..-- �'A iii.mot • . _ l r - ��7 i i . 1 I 1 Ilk ma.3 a LI NI)c'Car PIS \'' - 1111 S lT It- _5 .. f ' -Q, - 1 . Jrv3 -ce`_ M 'at ~ib Y —1=21,FT--- r o git N �� ii►.7 IY+NNNW►• -rd., I INTIPPIPPr- . 9yt5✓ -: . PIIIPI /A N 1 5\.� ,. , N�' r a `a S, �'f . L•"''. • y ya•j.•111..15..N' ‘ii 1.%a %I • S ..joirom ,• 4.� .A =Mr - .H.mi 4 ". . -4-- N ..'-N :fi .� A r �� ' - �4 1 Z►� 11. -'A - i , . __mom5`c�.✓ -14 -.: ‘361.,.. 04 ., . cox ,pkto ..:. .. .. . . __ , EN . • :.�, 'it -- .-_, , . 0 1 41TE H PR10E • 419, •relece PI j, •,,t4•^ f • CCOLORS AND MATERIALS hevron Consistent use of colors and materi- • als is crucial to Chevron's Hallmark ai, N # package. Soft grays and whites pro- I di r _ vide a neutral backdrop for attrac- �Ni r— tive accent colors which signal key Food Mart information areas to customers such s A, 1, i -r --- ._,,,,,. as services and amenities, pay c r w*;j" I. points and required safety �r��� information. C EA 1 h a _Auto $ervice IDENTIFICATION Accurately communicating q. Serve Gasoline 9 Chevron's unique qualities is para- I' mount in our new Hallmark pro- 10 REGULAR OSelf gram. In line with Chevron's LEADED WE WANT YOU 9 ro9ESATISFIED w.>^ customer-oriented philosophy, our 0 — , 1 1` ` identification program is clear and `. REGULAR StINEEM ® 0 0 io ttl m ` UNLEADED �` integrated, and offers customers the 9 right amount of information at theSUPREME 0 0 0 10 right time, allowing for safer traffic UNLEADED flow on adjacent roadways and on-site. ARCHITECTURE• Chevron's Hallmark architecture has been designed in a clean and simple style to help communicate an open, II friendly and uncomplicated atmo- Chevron i L A NDSCA PING sphere. Combined with neutral base �l Attractive, well-maintained land- colors, our Hallmark design is scaping compliments your commu- intended not to impose on the nity's efforts to maintain high neighborhoods we service. -- • _�• Food Mart , aesthetic standards and is extremely — I i important to Chevron and our �11 Hallmark program. \- 1 1INI '�` a "'�`} �.wQ •�... ' RESTROOMS °•; '.- - ,. ' ,7,_ - , � '•• ,t- , , • 4 `'Xi. +ti• *k;-• Seeing to the needs of our customers :1 .rt • .'I f• v.��f ._�,4+1.1t• • r... q.f_.a- 4G,-v. • • .5" ,„i�► .lr Y�. y A • �;: .. ems, .ems ,�.0 14- Z� i�a}t .a++ +�,._Mug' is a primary focus of our customer C ?:_ry s" •' '` ; - p .} -* ..c4,1. c ' service philosophy Providing and a-, Restrooms - • s . II promoting clean, safe and conve- , nient restroom facilities is another valuable Chevron service to our cus- tomers and your community. ACCESSIBILITY LIGHTING Chevron's new Hallmark service sta- On-site lighting has been specifi- tion is designed to provide custom- cally engineered to enhance ers with safe and easy ingress, Chevron's image of cleanliness and t° egress and on-site circulation by \ safety. Both ambient and task light- : •., z:. using strategically positioned \\ ing provide maximum visibility in vr graphics and signing combined _ - `PNoscP'? PEP customer service areas and work ' z000 ' ' - -- s00:0 0: :: with site specific layouts for ser- , ' ' ::;p:: r0t1::t impose on neighvices aameni _ ' ' _ .. j / ` P PP`H -�� \ o/ � / 1 `�` 0 \ c / � � \\ `k \\ \\\ 0 / FUEL ING A .B ( \\\ oN o A key component of Chevron's ° Hallmark image, the fueling area 8 0\S \0 \ � \O\ \ \ uses gasoline dispensers which are�� Ili O�SP 3 \�\ \\ \\ \ \ \ \ 0 clean, customer friendly and above oo\-" \ \ \ \ ? c P \ \ 2\O\ \ d all, safe and easy to use day and , `'t\O\o\SP S SPIES PRE . �\ 0S? \� V A� vs? \\ ei night. At each fueling position, \ \ \ \ _ important safety and operating \ \ \ \ �� \ A � � / \ \„\o s?6 information is organized and clearly , �HA\�aoN� displayed in a blue information , @1_ \\ \ `PNoSCPPe PPE panel on the overhead spanner. A \ \ valet unit, which contains wind- shield servicing equipment and a trash receptacle, is integrated 0 5\G � - \N ,.,e 0? with the efficient design of the fuel- --- �i � �q0 PP � � ing area. \I PPEP `h 0pEN\N \\ ..(DSCPP _- .- 40 P CHEVRON HALLMARK DESIGN Chevron's new customer friendly "Hallmark" design is a product of extensive consumer research con- • - a ducted in communities which repre- sent our major markets. Our goal :. ill was to develop a new service imageimps O■ ".4 .. •'y, rhevr _ k which meets the needs and expecta `r i tions of our customers and the com ""' munities which support us. The ' - i- „ result is a unique package of pleas- _ - -� la ing graphics, unobtrusive architec- ood l� .„, • 4 d=: Lure and substantial landscaping • I ill , - I LIN "4414 t • which works in harmony to provide i (d -+ I , i I i iii ` - .�i 0� immediate brand recognition and , I R �g MI6'1 1 1 1111 safe, easy use of each facility. This - new customer friendly design is the - .; t}. v.. a' "Hallmark" of Chevron's commit- .: —.. r+...c *t=... •w ► ' '• 4,,,`` 1. ment to your community. °j 'I„ �,y ,• ��► YM * ' r,." , -� , e - d �w i . Cry • :, '..� �N • �� II. ..t at., +�i�r `" �., pLfNN%NG D%VtS1ON crr(of RENTCN AUG 1 7 1990 R ;eiv al) Chevron Chevron U.S.A. Inc. IWO 301 S. Grady Way Renton, Wa. CHEVRON ' S COMMITMENT TO YOUR COMMUNITY Chevron has been in the business of keeping people on the move for nearly 80 years. Now more than ever, Chevron is dedicating its resources to upgrading and developing customer friendly facilities to provide better and more convenient locations with high quality products and services. We owe much of our success to the communities that support us.In turn, we've made it a priority to become involved with the communities we service. Chevron has a long standing tradition of supporting national and local charity groups,scholarship funds and other non-profit concerns. In addition, the majority of Chevron's motor gasolines are sold through Chevron stations operated by local people, thus contributing to the local economy. Chevron also employs local suppliers and contractors as well as contributing to the tax base of communities through property and sales tax dollars.