Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
LUA90-070
WELLS oft': N WELLS AVE. N. PI ELL )j A 1/4 sPELLY AVE. N. ❑ ❑ ❑ Cn ❑� h� (V, -- o u y [j � � I l r ❑ u _ I l / ) l 11 l m CIO ❑ ■ p ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑° I` l 14.4 D Elf ❑ r ❑ C Li it in o nI 1 1 1 , _ ❑ r )I I -11 1 , Of 1 n I PM f l- k .4a. N PARK AVE. N. n[ ❑ L U ❑ I 1 ❑ n n STORE 11 - rf T H .Ai nwr:�ON n f I I Z — n ❑ _l riZ - . ._ _-41 JUN26 • g, 1 1993 ty ._ L_RENTON SCHOOL DIST. r- _ ����' MAINTENANCE YARD ❑ � ❑ ❑ffi _- 1 l i � 1 piL G ; - i _ A All, AA GARDEN AVE. N. % c ❑ LI © ❑,— ❑ ❑ � z ❑ [ = ` ❑ = ❑ x. � rd ---;-1 =1.----simav 0 ❑ m q 4= :IC Hi ❑ ❑t❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑,— i I ❑ ❑❑ i-i❑ ❑ ❑ cio❑ :❑ ❑ ❑ r7 " k: .1 tO Mar Or) 7 1 o MEADOW AVE. N. 0 - II Ti m �� 1 $u $ o D7 r-- % .. j O IPIG ro,e y 1/0 � FACTORY AVE. N. 1 \ / / /\ \ / \ / Z T 1 i ( I 4 • AtOt ft _ \at\ :444,‘Ok% `,‘ 514%(\ s; 11111 j - *.4 4.11.4 I 11111) avk tvv**N. cit v. itht l N ' <' �µ John M. Kennelly • 315 Park Ave. N. Renton, WA 98055 Alta Nunn 323 Park Ave.. N. Renton, WA 98055 • J Carol Dobson 329 Park Ave. N. Renton, WA 98055 \ J Wong, Linda;. Yuen, Juliette; Summs, Inc 351 'Park Ave. N. P.O. Box 24 Renton, WA 98057 , \ J Lavina A. Kessler 314 Park Ave: N. ' • Renton, WA 98055 Jeffrey & Tamara Colee . V 330 Park Ave.' N. Renton, WA 98055 Renton School District ,435 Main Ave. S. Renton, WA ,98055' • Deborah E. Cook 336 Park Ave. N. Renton, WA 98055 , • L Ko-Tong. Tjok ` • 340 .Park Ave.. N. Renton, WA 98055 , ; •• • B. R. Cleworth 350 Park Ave, N. V " ' ' Renton, WA 98055 William T. Arundell 1200 N. 3rd St. • . Renton', WA 98055 \ J Joan Lotto Bakko. 1204 N. 3rd St. ' Renton, WA 98055 Ramsey, Walter G. & Donna • 1212 N. 3rd St. Renton, WA 98055 . J Mary E. AImberg • 1206 N.'.3rd St. - Renton, WA 98055 „ • Ruth SiMpsbn *303 -Garden;Ave. N. ' - Renton, WA 98055 - • • . • • - ;.1 • P: Neff -* . ;.• 356 Gard:en Ave. 'N. • . Renton', WA:-.98055 • ••. • • &•Sharbn, Ernest • 350 Garden Ave; N. ' • • ", Renton, WA 98055 . _ ' 1 ' • Joseph:H.'..CurrY • 346 Garden Ave. N. Renton, WA:98055 _ * David G. Wi,i 1 enborg' 338 Garden Ave. • •. Rento .n, WA 98055 • . Stuart W. Todd 336 Garden-'Ave;. , • ' Renton, WA:•98055,..,. ,• Mary Tobacco 324 Garden Ave. N. Renton WV98055- - • r • 7. • Roger.-,- PoqUett'e " . • 328, G'drden,.AVO‘:, Renton, WA 98055 • " • .• • - , • , Alma Lundberg, 326 Garden Ave.- • , Renton,. WA 98055 , -:,Robert AY.:vil la F. Gordon '3I8 Garden Ave. N. • . Rentbn, WA 98055 • Richard G. Friedli 314. Garden' Ave.. N. • . Renton, WA 98055 Greg C. Lueth 310 'Garden Ave. N. Renton, WA $8055 W.R, Smith . 359 Meadow Ave. N. Renton, 'WA •98055 Richard A: See 353 Meadow Ave. N. Renton, WA 98055 . D.. Louise Williams • 347 Meadow Ave. N. • Renton, WA 98055 • E.R." Pieper 345 Meadow'Ave, N. Renton; WA 98055 Vernie Thomas.. ' • 341 Meadow Ave. N. - Renton, WA 98055 - N John M. Barrett 339 Meadow Ave. N. Renton, WA 98055 • . _ J I - • 'Carol H.. Provty • 335 Meadow Ave. N.. .Renton; WA 98055 • J - Darlene D. Holma ' 329 Meadow Ave. N. - ' Renton., WA 98055 - -- - 1 . Jack Jahn & Rose Rossi . 325 Meadow Ave. N. Renton, -WA 98055 . • • � 1 Norman M. Schultz - 319 Meadow Ave. N. Renton, WA 98055 • RENTON SCHOOL GRAPHIC SCALE r DISTRICT MAINTENANCE N } - SIDEWALK r ' • ." = 40' W 10 r r - < ao 0' 25' 50' NORTH 4th STREET W$$ EXISTING DRIVEWAY EXPANDED DRIVEWAY .,/ONE WAY • • •- - 4 z N 10 - " ' . Cp m r N my �. SIDEWALK iile: . 1 lit LOT 13 • .• - FENCE B.H. CLEWORTH % - • �_ HOUSE 350 PARK :::•Nw> :.:•-� . - - : -• . -. -.NEW PARKING AREA • -. . -. -• . D ITS :.:.:i " v { _ • • •I ' . _ . . • . z • Z :� �. D 0 •LOT12 - - HENRY COOK - - + ZO HOUSE 346 PARK • • . - • . if . P� MI t 11 - • it LOT 11 Q"'. 11: : .. KO-TONG TJOK _ •- 11 - . . : V) HOUSE 340 PARK . o� •P r— :•�. . Off of �� . �z �oG� # v` (LAWN) I-• I� • 0 LOT 10 DEBORAH COOK r-- SCHOOL BUILDING 7 . • HOUSE kOUSE 336 PARK LOT 9 0 L___4 j WALK a RENTON SCHOOL DISTRICT ,-- y - �- DRIVEWAY - •► ttt I F I- LO 2 O M CI LOT 8 I EXISTING ASPHALT PARKING \ - ~ m J. k T. COLEE Q ul HOUSE 330 PARK N 2 M f N II 0 46 q. V^/ C• m I i — - , rat% . . ';, \ — yy y yyy "N .. �y N ' ril GI 19 P y�. AI 0 • =. • • • 744 . A IA o °tea: ' . . . . '.'[ , -: rn , ' • • * • / ; .•.. . . . ... '..• • Qq r • • ' A '• •• • • • • .:[A, m1 • •m A m m TTAA ATA * . . / A AT❑ At4 '9 • • • • •• • 4 4 AT AA A, A AT . . . • . • 4 v I • . � • i AA A A A 4 A A`�A T TEA 4 4TA**AA4A A,A T T A,4'* A, *4, „, TA, . 4* A A A, T T T *4, mA• A A *4, TT Ah A A A, A A* A, T % AM A,* T4A * * T A�AA*_A4AT..d,^` AAA A 4' 1,*-44,*�A A A,* A A,ATA,TT�A�T 1, • In I- LNON '3AV N3421Y0 — • moan GEM o w SARTORI RENTON SCHOOL DIST. #403 YUHL & ASSOCIATES HEALTH OCCUPATIONS 435 MAIN AVE. S. 12828 NORTHUP WAY & APPRENTICESHIP CENTER RENTON, WA. BELLEVUE 98005 315 GARDEN AVE. N. ( 641-2886 ) • • • John, W.., Dobson 404 •Pai^k-Ave. N. • -.Renton,;,WA 9805.5' • Arco Ga ' Station. �II : �405''':Par,k Ave'. -N • f" `Renton=;`TWA.:.98055x..aN1_ r • I ossi __ _s .Nnr w do,(U3d NOISNoI�lO3a ONINNb'l . t _ . MEMORANDUM - SA- o-?0 - 90 To Flle Date 2-/5/91 From G-N Subject 5 'vri Sckc2oL Por I pro)e A-t,vsed.. (nitre j h I vi 4 Le pke zih/g I — �h c� Pete apt'I on actC -'f c Q- y )i e‹,0 s ( )culdtb- h�-CP cam- Aw 'i nc-3J subr tc • Ili 11 ' III j YU f'I L & (206) 641-2886 12828 NORTHUP WAY ASSOCIATES BELLEVUE, WA 98005 • January 11, 1991 CITY OF RENTON }:ZE C f:_ n V E City of Renton li t Jr%:, s 5 j Department of!iPlanning/Building/Public Works 200 Mill Avenue South Bl9'� i ION Renton, WA 98055 ,y���„ Ili Attn: Laureen 'ljNicolas Re: Sartori School Parking Dear Laureen: llf � We have made'„changes in this project to avoid putting in a parking lot on the playground. 'Would you please exchange the attached 12. copies of the SEPA Checklist dated November 8, 1990 for ones that were previously sent? Also, exchange the 12 copies of the attached drawings for the ones you have. Mark wants another application and to pay another permit fee. It seems inappropriate to require the School District to make out a new application and pay more fees when the amended drawings and checklist reflect a reduced scope of work on the same project that was submitted on June 15, 1990. Sincerely yours, 101AL Michael Yul�l, P.E. lj Attadhments as Listed • cc: Renton School District �u MHY:c li li %• JE. CITY JF RENTON f7, Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Earl Clymer, Mayor Lynn Guttmann, Administrator November 1, 1990 Versie Vaupel P.O. Box 755 Renton, WA 98057 SUBJECT: Satori/Parking Lot Addition ECF; SA-070-90 4.4(4u,.-------- Dear Its..Vaupet Due to your past interest on this project, I am writing to inform you that, in a letter dated October 12, 1990, the applicant withdrew the above referenced project. Due to the concerns expressed by yourself and others, the School District needs time to reconsider their options. The letter of withdrawal noted that the Renton School District Board of Directors made two decisions regarding the Satori School at their meeting of October 3, 1990, as follows: 1) There will be no paving of the grassy playfield area. 2) Explore the_possibility of blacktopping the graveled area south of the present blacktop spaces. On October 24, the Shool District's engineer submitted a letter and a preliminary plan indicating the restripping of the existing lot and paving a portion of the graveled area at the south end of the existing parking area. Staff has informed the School District that this would require the submittal of a new site plan application and environmental review. The School District has indicated that it could be several weeks before the application is submitted since their engineer's time is already committed to other projects. If you have any further question regarding this matter, please contact Mark Pywell, Project Manager, or myself at 235-2550. Si I , Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator 1/5 Wa" 1111 (- Idiekr% ";"./7" .. I /Aril 11-14/e2 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2569 SA- 010- cta - CITY OF RENTON "LL Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Earl Clymer, Mayor Lynn Guttmann, Administrator October 31, 1990 Michael H. Yuhl, P.E. Yuhl &Associates 12828 Northup Way Bellevue, WA 98005 SUBJECT: Satori School Parking Addition Dear Mr. Yuhl: I have discussed your letter, dated October 24, 1990, with the Zoning Administrator, Don Erickson. The City of Renton Municipal Code Sections 4-31-33.A.1, A.2, and B.1 requires an administrative site plan approval for the development proposed in your letter. Also, SEPA(WAC 197-11-800) only exempts parking lots designed for 20 vehicles. Your plans indicated that you will be expanding the parking lot by more than 20 vehicles, therefore, an environmental checklist will need to be submitted with the site plan application. If you have any questions regarding this matter or desire to meet with the Zoning Administrator or myself, please contact me at 235-2550. Sincerely, Mark R. P ell, AICP Senior Planner 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2569 IEMORANDUM To Marilyn Peterson, City Clerk Date October 25, 1990 From Sandi S15oktevelopment Planning Subject Renton School District (SATORI) SA-070-90,ECF , The above file was withdrawn by the applicant on October 12, 1990. I am sending it to your. office to be filed. R 40 CITY OF RENTON ..LL . Hearing Examiner Earl Clymer, Mayor Fred J.Kaufman PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF F{ENTON October 23 , 1990 }� EC pp. Michael Hannis Attorney At Law 3900 East Valley Road Renton, Washington. and Roger Blaylock The Blaylock Company 10717 N.E. 4th Bellevue, Washington • Re: Satori - Appeals of New Proposed Parking and Pavement Repairs and Determination of Non-Significance SA-070-90 Dear Messrs Hanis and Blaylock This office reviewed your letters and was in the process of scheduling the appropriate hearings when we received correspondence on this issue. Confirmation of that correspondence demonstrates that the matters referenced above have been withdrawn by the School District. Therefore, the matters are dismissed. Sincerely, FRED J. UFMAN . HEARING EXAMINER FJK/dk cc: Lawrence Warren, City Attoney Erickson, Zoning Administrator Mark Pywell, Senior Planner • } . .■.__L__ _ nonce _ /In�1 i2S-icQZ SA- O-TO -1O _ 47"; A.i. �a`j ��S. : RENTON 3000 Northeast Fourth Street VOCATIONAL Renton. Washington 98056 TECHNICAL [206] 235-2352 i INSTITUTE PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF RENTON October 22, 1990 OCT 2 5 7990 RECEIVED Mr . Mark Powell, AICP Project Manager, City of Renton Public Works Department 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 Dear Mark Your letter of October 10, 1990 asks a number of questions that need some background information to better understand our use of Satori School. In 1969 with enrollment declining in the Renton School District, the local school board voted to close Sartori as an elementary school. The school district then reopened it as the Alternative High School until 1980 when it moved to Earlington, another vacated elementary school. In 1980 as Renton V.T.T. was gaining enrollment and needing more space, the school district allowed us to occupy Sartori. During R.V.T.I. 's occupancy, the lower level of Sartori has been dedicated to Apprenticeship training and has remained this for the past 10 years. The upper level, however, has been used for several purposes. Initially with the large influx of Southeast Asians into this area, Sartori became an English-as-a-Second-Language Center to help these people to better function in our community. As this need lessened, we began to develop ANEW (Apprenticeship & Non- traditional Employment for Women) and Health training programs to meet the health industries growing need for a trained work force. These programs outgrew the available space we had at Sartori and were moved to the R.V.T.I. main campus in September 1989. As health was moving out of Sartori, we were consolidating several "off hour" Boeing training classes, that were spread throughout Renton, and moving them into Sartori. At this time, we also converted two classroom spaces to offices for Washington Human Development at Sartori . The entire time that Renton V.T.I. has been using Sartori, our students have parked in front of the neighbors' homes causing an irritation between us and them. Presently, the existing parking lot has deteriorated to the point of needing to be repaved. Our intention has always been to try to be a good neighbor, therefore, we were willing to incur the expense to increase the size of the parking lot to ease the "on street" parking by our students. Sartori has 18 classroom spaces with 18 available! seats per space for a maximum of 324 students. We have operated both day and evening classes from the time we took possession of Sartori in 1980. Again, Mark, we are not asking for additional parking due to expansion, but to correct a situation that has existed since our occupancy. ' I If I can be of further assistance,please contact me at 235-2463. Si cerel (z) c?S!S4--•-1 Jon Pozega Director of Student Services and Plant Operations CITY OF RENTON MEMORANDUM DATE: October 17, 1990 TO: Fred J. Kaufman, Hearing Examiner FRO : Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator SUBJECT: Satori-SA-070-90 In response to your memo, dated October 16, 1990. Both of the appeals, received on October 8, 1990 from North Renton/Kennydale Neighborhood Defense Fund, refer to the parking lot expansion that was proposed by the Renton School District. In their letter, dated October 12, 1990,the Renton School District has withdrawn the application, referenced above. At some future time, if the School District desires to propose to develop a new parking lot a new application will have to be filed. If you have any questions, please contact Mark Pywell or myself at ext. 2550. • %o ` CIT' OF RENTON "LL Hearing Examiner Earl Clymer, Mayor Fred J.Kaufman MEMORANDUM DATE: October 16, 1990 TO: Mark Pywell, Senior Planner 1) FROM: Fred J. Kaufman, Hearing Examiner SUBJECT: Satori - SA-070-90 This office has received the attached correspondence. Before taking further action we would like to be assured that the matters are one and the same. If the letter of October 12, 1990 from the School District does address both items, this office will dismiss matters. If by some chance other items are contemplated by these letters, the matter will be scheduled for hearing. For purposes of closing the file, I would appreciate your response in writing. Thanks. 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2593 • �,�� NOS>� Ft ilities �:J �j re:4,aons Center ir X —_�_� 121 1220 North 4th Street, Renton, Waehingrton 98055 • �. 403 ' 1 AN NI N i. UIVi`. • • October 12 , 1990 IVED RECEIVES1990 Mark R. Pywe11 AICp OCT 12 Department of Planning pCT 121990 City of Renton ,Irr r ��N HEAry RING EXAMINE. ER 200 Miii Ave. 80. • HEARING Renton , WA 98055 Dear Mark: The Renton School .District Board of Direct.orM made a decision at their meeting of Wednesday. October 3 , 1990 regarding the Sartori School Parking Lot as follows : 1. There will be no paving of the grassy play field are . 2 . Explore the possibility of blacktopping the graveled area south of the present blacktopped spaces . Because of the magnitude of ' ned chaneS on the I feel it is in the, best interest ofsthecDistrictgto withdrawioJec:tt ou application for this project and re-submit a scaled down versionr at a later date. Please accept my thanks for all the assistance o and we will look forward to working withyouyou ure givent Schools District projects. on future Menton Sincerel , F°:le;4 of Ziel044.., ' ck Stracke Exec. Director Of Facilities & Operations • c: Gary Kohlwed Mike Yuhl Jon Pozega Board of Directors Joe Lamborn RECEIVED NOTICE OF APPEAL OCT 08 1990 OF CITY OF RENTON ADMINISTRATIVE DETERMINATION HEARING EXAMINER DATE: OCTOBER 8, 1990 TO: CITY OF RENTON HEARING EXAMINER FROM: NORTH RENTON/KENNYDALE NEIGHBORHOOD DEFENSE FUND RE: Satori - New Parking and Pavement Repairs (Use Change and Use Expansion of Conditional Use in P-1 Zone) ECF; SA-070-90 The North Renton/Kennydale Neighborhood Defense Fund hereby appeals under both Sections 4-8-11 (B) 1 a and b of the Hearing Examiner Ordinance of the Renton Municipal Code the administrative decision of the Zoning Administrator and Environmental Review Committee -to process a site plan approval for the above-referenced project for the following reasons : 1 ) The proposal description upon which the administrative determination and determination not to conduct a public hearing as part of the site plan review Process was made is inadequate and incomplete information. " There are significant unresolved concerns that are raised by the proposal . " [RMC 4-31-33(C)8a] . The site plan application to construct new parking and the repair of 40 - 50 old parking spaces does 'not consider the fact is that the parking lot is not an accessory use, but actually the driving force that determines the type and SATORI SCHOOL ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL OCTOBER 8 , 1990 PAGE 2 intensity of the primary use on the site. Construction of a new parking lot will allow both change the use from a local school to a regional school and a 300%+ intensification of the activities in the school . 2) Inappropriate interpretation of provisions of the Renton Municipal Code by the Zoning Administrator and Environmental Review Committee. Section 4-31-9(B) la of the P-1 Public Zone permits "Governmental Buildings such as hospitals, libraries, museums, and schools. " The Zoning Administrator has accepted a request for site plan approval in the P-1 Zone incorrectly. The Declaration of Non-Significance is the first formal action by the City of Renton notifying the public of the proposed site plan approval request by RVTI . First, "schools" are not defined in the zoning code. However, the Parking and Loading Ordinance, RMC 4-14-8(E) does distinguish between both the type and intensity of schools: elementary, junior high, senior high,, and colleges & universities, and sets different access and parking standards for these uses . • • • SATORI SCHOOL ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL OCTOBER 8, 1990- PAGE 3 • • • In the recent past, the City of Renton has faced many land use issues of intensity -resulting from the level and service area of government that is -utilizing the building or land use. Examples include: ( 1)• District versus Municipal . Court, (2 ) State -of Washington Employment ,Secu7ity Office, (3) Metro :Sewage Treatment Plant, (4). Reconstruction of I-405 and the Renton S-Curves, and (5) RVTI in the Renton Highlands . Satori was constructed as a -local neighborhood elementary school not 'a regional institute of higher - education, unlike ,-the main RVTI Highland Campus that services all of' south King County. Section 4-14-2 of the Parking and Loading Ordinance- does . states, this ' is a "Change of Use: - • When the occupancy of any land use, structure and/or building or any part of a building, structure, and/or- land use is changed to another use requiring increased parking stalls, parking shall be -provided to' • • meet the parking requirements of the new use, as specified in .Section 4-14-8. (Ord. 3988, 4-28-86)" Therefore, RVTI ' s request to increase on-site parking can only be viewed -as the . intensification, of a regional • educational use on site located in a low density single- family residential neighborhood. - SATORI SCHOOL ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL OCTOBER 8, 1990 . •• . PAGE 4 I , REQUEST: • The Hearing Examiner remand the application to the Zoning Administrator and require RVTI to submit a. complete site plan review application with an expanded environmental checklist for review in the public hearing process before the Hearing Examiner. • Dated this 8th day of October, 1990 . NORTH RENTON/KENNYDALE - NEIG R OD DEFENSE FUND Darrel Igelmund, Pre t Marjodie J . Richter, Secretary Versie Vaupel , Treasurer (by Michael M.. Hanis, ; attorney) HANIS & OLSON Michael M. Hanis i • Attorneys for Defense Fund I ! NOTICE OF APPEAL ADMINISTRATIVE INTERPRETATION I ? r I I i I I • • RECEIVED • OCT 08 1990 CITY OF ENTON -NOTICE OF APPEAL OF MITIGATED HEARING EXAMINER DETERMINATION Or NONSIGNIFICANCE • Date: . October 4, 1990 . To: _ City of Renton Hearing Examiner From: North Renton/Kennydale Neighborhood Defense Fund Re: Sartori - New Parking and• Pavement Repairs ECF;SA-070-90 The •North • •Renton/Kennydale Neighborhood Defense Fund hereby appeals -the Determination of Norisignificance - - Mitigated issued for the above-referenced project for the following reasons: 1) The proposal description upon which the !DNS was ' made is inadequate and incomplete. The Environmental Checklist prepared for this Proposal merely describes some of the physical modifications that will be performed in furtherance of the actual proposal (,A. 11 . of Checklist) . Only the impacts of those specific physical ' modifications are considered. . The actual , :proposal is to increase, parking capacity for the RVTI, and; in view of the number of square feet in the building, potentially increase the capacity. of the school itself. WAC 197-11-060 (3) (a) states, "Agencies• -Shall make certain that the proposal that. is the subject of environmental review ' . is properly defined" . (3) (a) (iii) states in part .that ..a.gencies "are encouraged -to 'describe public or nonproject, proposals in terms of objectives rather than preferred solutions" . This is NOTICE 'OF APPEAL .OF DNS - 1 . a public project, and subject to objective review. The impacts of a slab of pavement -. 'the solution - where there is now a grass playfield are not insignificant to the neighborhood. However, an even greater concern here is the impact of an expansion of the current usage of the institution on this residential neighborhood - increased vehicle activity, more persons in the neighborhood, increased nighttime attendance and activity, and inconsistency with established objectives for the preservation of this neighborhood. WAC 197-11-060 (3).(iii) also states, "Proposals should be described in ways that encourage considering and comparing alternatives. " If this -proposal were properly described as being to increase parking capacity for the RVTI, then such alternatives as shared parking with the nearby bus maintenance facility, renting of surplus space outside of the neighborhood, a modest shuttle bus system from another parking location (eg. under-utilized park-and-ride 'facilities) , or organized car pooling could all have been considered, any of which could accomplish the goal of the project without the loss of recreational space, and the non-resident traffic impacts on the residential North Renton Neighborhood. Ironically, the provision of more convenient parking may prove to be a disincentive for current car pooling and transit use, and could well increase reliance on private automobiles even without an increase in attendance at the facility. This indirect impact NOTICE OF APPEAL OF DNS - 2 has not been considered. 2.) The long-term effects of the proposal have not been considered. WAC 197-11-060 (4 ) (c) requires that an agency "shall carefully consider the range of probable impacts, including short-term and long-term effects. Impacts shaill include those that are likely to arise over the lifetime of a proposal" . The review of this proposal assumes that the only , impacts are those short term ones arising from the construction activity itself. 3) The indirect impacts of the proposal have not been considered. WAC 197-11-060 (4 ) (d) states as follows: A proposal' s effects include direct and indirect impacts caused by a proposal. Impacts include those effects resulting from growth caused by a proposal, as well as the likelihood that the present proposal wil,l 'serve as a precedent for future actions. The indirect impacts of this proposal include increased utilization of the school, future expansion of activity, higher attendance numbers , more evening attendance in the neighborhood, loss of a community recreational amenity.,_ alteration of traffic and parking patterns in the neighborhood, air pollution, the incremental " effect of an expanded non- residential use within a neighborhood_ which has been designated for protection of its residential character, and noise. Failure to adequately identify and consider. these impacts makes adequate mitigation impossible. NOTICE OF APPEAL OF DNS - 3 '8r RVTI must commit to no expanded attendance or usage of the school as made possible by this proposal, in which case such a limitation would be an appropriate additional mitigation measure. If RVTI will not agree to such mitigation, then the proposal must be considered as if it will have the indirect impact of expanded usage of the facility. 4) The cumulative impacts of the proposal have _ not been considered. - WAC 197-11-060 (4) (e) and 197-11-792 require consideration of cumulative impacts in an EIS. In order to mitigate cumulative impacts to make an EIS unnecessary, those cumulative impacts must be identified and considered. 5) The proposal's relationship to existing land use plans has not been adequately considered. This project is within the North Renton Resolution 2708 neighborhood. Resolution 2708 states objectives and requirements regarding transportation, traffic, and land use. As such it is relevant to all land use decisions, and is itself a land use document. WAC 197-11-444 (2) (b) (i) describes as an element of the "built environment" that must be considered the "relationship to existing land use plans and to estimated population_" . . The Checklist submitted herein refers only to P-1 . zoning and comprehensive plan designations. The failure to give any consideration to Resolution 2708, the North Renton Neighborhood Protection Plan, 'the Livable Streets concept, or the North Renton Traffic Benefit Zone, makes a determination of NOTICE OF APPEAL OF DNS - 4 appropriate mitigation grossly inadequate. Resolution 270.8 also constitutes additional reason to consider alternatives to meet the facility'.s parking needs. The amount of paving for this large site will give it an increased "industrial" look - inconsistent with Renton' s " highest priorities" in preserving the North Renton Neighborhood as stated in the Resolution. The replacement of the view of a large expanse of lawn, a residential type of amenity, with a large expanse of concrete renders the proponent ' s statement in B. 10 .b. of the Checklist incorrect. The mitigation condition is inadequate. 6) The proposal's failure to specify what is intended by reference to "storage", and removal of existing buildings prevents adequate consideration of impacts that may require mitigation. Item A. 11. of the Checklist refers to "storage" in a completely ambiguous manner. Will storage be increased? What will be stored? How will it be delivered? , How will it be screened? Without the specifics as to these issues, which are not discussed anywhere in the record of this proposal, appropriate mitigation cannot be evaluated. WAC 197-11- 3.40 (3) (a) provides that a .DNS procured by ",lack of material disclosure" shall be withdrawn by the lead agency. NOTICE OF APPEAL OF DNS "- 5 Dated this 5th day of October, 1990 . NORTH RENTON/RENNYDALE NEIGHB 0 DEFENSE FUND Darrel gelmund,; Pre ' nt Marjo ie J. chter, Secretary uei acs-joje /�/'SVersie Vaupelresur (by Michael M. Hanis, attorney) HANIS & OLSO Michael M. anis Attorneys for Defense Fund i NOTICE OF APPEAL OF DNS - 6 5G"°0o , Facilities . & Operations Center E~ \seJ; 1220 North 4th Street, Renton, Washington 98055 v y • 403 ' . PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF RENTON OCT 1 6 1990 ECEWWE October 12, 1990 Mark R. Pywell, AICP Department of Planning City of Renton 200 Mill Ave. SO. Renton, WA 98055 Dear Mark: The Renton School District Board of Directors made a decision at their meeting of Wednesday, October 3, 1990 regarding the Sartori School Parking Lot as follows : 1. There will be no paving of the grassy play field area. 2. Explore the possibility of blacktopping the graveled area south of the present blacktopped spaces. Because of the magnitude of these instructed changes on the project, I feel it is in the best interest of the District to withdraw our application for this project and re-submit a scaled down version at a later date. Please accept my thanks for all the assistance you have given us and we will look forward to working with you on future Renton School District projects. Sincerel 77, bir"‘ `� Rick Stracke Exec. Director of Facilities & Operations c: Gary Kohlwes Mike Yuhl Jon Pozega Board of Directors Joe Lamborn . FACILITIES-&-OPERATIONS CENTER --Renton-School-District-No.--403 1220 North 4th Street RENTO ' SCHOOL BIST RI; i u S POST AGE Renton, WA 98055 !�. ��aae� FOAM ��9p • OC715'9U • ((�� r�j� _ tee• �m� 96'�3 �� ?,3. t� a l� .L. R"xENTON, l A 98065 0 AS/`6tosaIaL. • • Mark R. Pywell, AICP Dept. of Planning City of Renton 200 Mill Ave. So. Renton, WA ( 98055 i `o ; CITY OF RENTON Department of Planning/Building/Public Works • Earl Clymer, Mayor Lynn Guttmann, Administrator October 10, 1990 John Pozega Renton Vocational Technical Institute 3000 N. 4th Street• Renton,WA 98056 • • SUBJECT: Satori School Parking Lot Addition ECF;SA-070-90 • Dear Mr. Pozega: Please provide the following Information as soon as possible In writing so that we may continue processing the application referenced above: 1. A new project description which describes the project as It is now proposed. 2. Twelve copies of the revised site plan and a pint. 3. The total population of the Satori School for the years 1988, 1989, 1990 and the projectED population for the 1991-1992 school year. 4. The date(s) at which the classes otlier than the plumbers and pipe fitters started. 5. The date at which evening courses started. 6. Is this request for additional parking in conjunction with an expansion of the programs held at the Satori School site (either in number of students or number of programs). If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact me at 235-2550. Sincerely, /;,/k171J4///7,:r/. Mark R. Pywel AICP • Project Manager • 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2569 NNING DIVISION 1 0. 0 4. 90 0 6 : 1 6 PM ci fY OF RENTON P 0 1 OCT - 5 1990 --CI ED MAIL BOXES ETC. USA ELECTRONIC MAIL SERVICE FRCS IMILE TR- ANSMITTAL COVERSHEET DATE: a TIME: MESSAGE REF.#. # OF PAGES (INCLUDING COVERSET) \\\\\\\\\\\\\\`\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ TO: �� _ Q/&/ -&lfr ;S'o et/ FAX # .222c: .2 „9' COMPANY 7-Y o el' „Li e N ' CONTACT ADDRESS: Ica U/z.4 / b ' \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ ,\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ \\\\ \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ FROM: i��rf?5.,' Y/� lL PHONE# /1 3/ 9 51-- 3 ' COMPANY: (9 gl I• NOTE: IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS ADDRESS: T. D r3� C / OR PROBLEMS WITH THIS r TRANSMISSION, NOTIFY THE �^ �► S`" CONTACT PERSON AT THE /1 ` NUMBER INDICATED BELOW \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ \\ \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\N\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ TRANSMITTED VIA: MAIL BOXES ETC. USA # 336 . FAX # (114.) .892-9612 3817 Lay Ferry Road CONTACT NAME pave pu�l,ey -- • St. Louis, MO 63125 CONTACT #J314) 892-8492 CONTACT HOURS:: M F• 7:30-6:30 SAT.9-4 • . \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ CCITT (GROUP) FAX MACHINE: , COMPATIBILITY # 'S (MAKE AND MODEL NUMBER) (G1, G2, G3) • TRANSMIT MODE: NORMAL FINE SUPER FINE 1/2 TONE. RECEIVEMODE: I AUTO-24-HOUR ( ) MANUAL ( ) \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS: \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ w.. 10 , 04. 90 06 : 1 6 PM P02 p� NG DIVISION • �„ , DF BENTO 5 1990 Versie Vaupe2. OCT - Tempo: PO Box 16367, Lemay NO 63125 • RECEIVED 1-314-894-3895; FAX 314-892-9612 October 4, 1990 ; REC Penn. : PO Bcx 755, Renton WA 98057 255-3684 • If TO: Don Erickson, Zoning Administrator, City of Penton Re: Sartori/RVTI change of use; your letter of October 3 FAXed to me i • I will answer yoi paragraph by paragraph, so kindly refer to your letter and pre- tend each one is ;numbered. 1. You say you are "disheartened" that I have misconstrued your and Mark's action when you thought you were working on the community's behalf. Don, I don't doubt that you probably, thought you were working on the community's behalf in trying to accommodate the intensification of this regional facility which just happen:; to be in a predominantly single-firmly neighborhood. Your interpretation of the "com- munity" is obviously different fran your perspective than what I and others feel the good of the "camtuni ty" is. I would remind you, too (although I don't kncxa for sure if you had anything to do with the final decision on other things) , that the North Renton amMunity has seldom been the focus of good intentions from most. city officials in the past. We did think that for awhile we were making headway, and then, lo, we get;thttripod again. I would add that. 1.f you lived in North Renton I doubt that. you would see your and Mark's actions .in dealing with the 1n7TI as a great course of action. Again, I reiterate I don't doubt your sincerity; I just doubt the focus of most city officials rcgardiny development in North Renton. 2. Yes, I recall that you, Mark and I walked the site about a month ago, probably less. I don't. understand the "big toy" (did you mean a big boy's park?) . Tn this paragraph, I ,agree with the next five sentences, through "east side of the street," in line 1.0. Following on, "Your (my) major concern appeared to be open space." I don't know a out;how I "appeared" to you, but, yes, one of my major concerns was and is open spaces in North Renton. Then, you did menti onSEPA, but I don't believe you said anything about it not being a SERA issue. You indicated to us that there was indeed a reason .for concern for the community, that there h,ar' to be a change in use to require that much pore parking. You or Mark or some city official indicated that . RVTI was consolidating its apprenticeship programs and were moving in more staff and students, evidently. You say you then met with RVTI where they made the magnamious offer of setting aside 25 percent of our (North Renton's and the citi'Ons of Renton School District) kids' playgt undo school yard. As to your researching the P-1 gone, and then finding :that all 's O.K. there, well., we'll leave that to other authorities. You did Say (yotuh last sentence in the second paragraph) that. you could handle that adi inistratively!but that should also be forwarded to the Hearing Examiner. 3. On September. 7, as you say, we probably met, although I' don't have my calendar with me--I don't. take such things cut of town, but in dealing with the City of Renton, perhaps I should. And, yes, I drew a line in the grass but actually referred to other lines in the grass and no 1 i nes in the grass. Never was anything permanent in my mind as to where the line should be. We offered suggestions on what could, not should, happen. ,We thought at that time you were going into negotiations to work on behalf of the corhnun.i ty and not. TdVT'I. We keep forgetting that staff in public hearings always or almost always presents the developers' views, not the residents' views. And--here we go again--no, I did not say what was the minimum in any definite sense. And as to the change in use, you said that THEY SAID it was not a change An use, and again, you gom dawn on the side of the deve.loper(RVTI's regional facility) without seemingly investigating theist figures. The developer always segos to tell the truth, but citizens seemingly lie or don't know their own minds or know what's going on or ,what's really gcx?d for then. Only the developer and city staff know for sure. The 320- 1: :w _;1_ U.,, U4. UU U16 : 16 P P33 __) Page 2 - Don Erickson people-per-day ac*Iiti.i wasn't probably verified--just "take my word for it" attitude of RVTI. In any avant, that 320 figure would be a change in use; it has never had 320 people there each lay, I airy sure. What about its last change of use? Did RVTI ever get a conditional use or other permit for the change to a higher educational institu- tion from an elementary school? There ARE different needs in those uses. As to the last sentence in the third paragraph, don't be putting wrong words in my mouth relative the problem bEon-ttreet parking in front of residences an Garden. If this is an official statement; i.e., that I didn't care about this issue or that it was "secondary" to the need to keep the last visage of usable open space in North Penton, then the officials of Renter, indeed have short memories. One shouldn't have to think back very far--to the' settlement of the Horbach lawsuit, for instance--to remember that the North. Rentan/Kennydale Neighborhood Defense Fund held out tenaciously for protection of Garden Avenue located south of North 4th. In fact, we spent our longest period of time fight- ing on that issue, :including, if pro-rated, our largest amount of money. Please try to keep the issues!right. We NEVER inch cated what's primary, secondary or tertiary. 4. Staff had no right to present it "minimum" proposal which was non-existent, but if it did exist, why would you present my "minimum" proposal? I could have done that. Again, I thought yOu were negotiating for the residents at that time, not presenting any kind of minimutt,whether fact or fiction, that would encroach so heavily on our area. You should have been negotiating on all issues for the city's residents to see what the residents could gain. Period. The last sentence of that paragraph said that staff considered you ha.d'a major concession from the District and RV`,PI. RVTI'was rr king some concessions? Who are they to make concessions? We, the ci ti.eens of the Renton School District, own that facility, not wrI. They may eventually steal it (legally) , but not without a fight. When residents, though, make "concessions" or asked to "cut ranise" with development, only the residents lose. On any "ccr>gramise," development wins something. This is getting too tedious,di sputing your letter sentence by sentence. Suffice it to say, that there is disagreement in every paragraph and most of the sentences. I will go directly to the last page (page 3) , first paragraph, where it appears that the city is placing us in another Catch 22 situation and perhaps may even be setting another trap for us as happened!in the Boeing noise mitigations where the administration and we appellants had an agreement, even a written one (signed by officials of the City of Renton) , that wentidown to the last day for the curt suit which had been prepared and awaiting word foil the administration. Then, after the appeal to court was lost, the city changed its collective mind, and we were had. Although you may not think you were intending to do that to us again, that is exactly the way we see it, intended or not. We can lose our appeal date which is up Monday the 8th, and there is nothing in this paragraph that guarantees anything, and even if it did, we found opt the ci ty's word, although sincerelyigiven at the time, isn't always'kept when given to residents if a development wants something else. But, Don, you never did answer a basic Print I made in my last letter, i.e. , whether or not the staff seiriously considered the input that was asked for in the first notice (Declaration of Non-Significance-Mitigated) . Again, what is your response to those letters? Did they .get considered? What your process says to us is that your staff publishes such a notice of non-significance, asks for comments, forgets the cements, does not change your three puny "mitigations" because they are so wonderful even though you admitted then and in your last letter that there wore some issues, does not notify the people who c nncnted that the appeal period was running, that your only notifica- tion was a notice in the paper. Why didn't you consider our issues submitted? And • why didn't you notify us the appeal period was punning? I'm ashamed of the City of Renton. . .again. - Wtr oonfu. ion and exasperation, Versie Vaupel . Versie Vaupe__ Tempo: PO Box 16367, Lenay MO 63125 1-314-894-3895; FAX 314-892-9612 October 4, 1990 Perm. : PO Box 755, Renton WA 98057 255-3684 PLANNING DIVISION _ CITY OF RFt1iTON To: Don Erickson, Zoning Administrator, City of Renton OCT - 9 1990 Re: Sartori/RVTI change of use; your letter of October 3 FAXed to meRECENE D I will answer you paragraph by paragraph, so kindly refer to your letter and pre- tend each one islnumbered. 1. You say you are ."disheartened'.' that I have misconstrued your and Mark's action when you thought you were working on the community's behalf. Don, I don't doubt that you probably thought you were working on the community's behalf.in trying to accommodate the intensification of this regional facility which just happens to be in a predominantly single-family neighborhood. Your interpretation of the "com- munity" is obviously different from your perspective than what I and others feel the good of the ',,community" is. I would remind you, too (although I don't know for sure if you had anything to do with the final decision on other things) , that the North Renton community has seldom been the focus of good intentions from most city officials in thelpast. We did think that for awhile we were making headway, and then, lo, we get thumped again. I would add that if you lived in North Renton I doubt that you would see your and Mark's actions in dealing with the RVTI as a great course of action. Again, I reiterate I don't doubt your sincerity; I just doubt the focus 'of most city officials regarding development in North Renton. 2. Yes, I recall that you, Mark and I walked the site about a month ago, probably . less. I don't understand the "big toy" (did you mean a big boy's park?) . In this paragraph, I agree with the next five sentences, through "east side of the street," in line 10. Following on,• "Your (my) major concern appeared to be open space." I don't know about how I "appeared" to you, but, yes, one of my major concerns was and is open spaces in North Renton. Then, you did mention SERA, but I don't believe you said anything about it not being a SEPA issue. You indicated to us that there was indeed a reason for concern for the community, that there had to be a change in use to require that Muchmore parking. You or Mark or some city official indicated that RVTI was consolidating its apprenticeship programs and were moving in more staff and students, evidently.. You say you then met with RVTI where they made the magnamious offer of setting ,`aside 25 percent of Our (North Renton's and the, citizens of Renton School District) ;,kids' playground/school yard. As to your researching the P-1 zone, and then findinglthat all's O.K. there, well, we'll leave that to other authorities. You did say (your last sentence in the second paragraph) that you could handle that administratively 'but that should also be forwarded to the Hearing Examiner. 3. On Septemberj7, as you say, we probably met, although I don't.have my calendar with me--I don't take such things out of town, but in dealing with the City of Renton, perhaps I should. And, yes, I drew a line in the grass but actually referred to other lines in the grass and no lines in the grass. Never was anything permanent in my mind as to where, the line should be. We offered suggestions on what could, not should, happen. pe thought at that time you were going into negotiations to work on behalf of the cuiixuunity and not RVTI. We keep forgetting that staff in public hearings always or almostLalways presents the developers' views, not the residents' views. And-,here we go again--no, I did not say what was the minimum in any definite sense. And as to the change in use, you said that THEY SAID it was not a change in use, and again, You came down on the side of the developer (RVTI's regional facility) without seemingly invest gating their. figures. The developer always seems to tell the truth, but citizens seemingly lie or don't know their own minds or know what's going on or what's really good for them. Only the developer and city staff know for sure. The .320- • /OctobeFL0N1 GI(Y OF R NTONIVISION To: Don Erickson, Zoning Administrator Planning Et Cetera Department, City of Rento, ;T _ 9 1990 Enclos�9 please find letter to you dated OctoberaEaiR iE D with a-copy of letter I wrote to the local newspaper. The October 4 letter was FAXed to you yesterday; I thought it well to have my original in the Sartori-RVTI file. I would also ask that the copy of letter to the Valley Daily News be placed in the official Sartori-RVTI file. Thank you for your cooperation. Warren F. £t Versie Vaupel Versie Vaupel Tt/-� 1-314-894-3895 Penn. : PO Box 755, Renton WA 856 Telegraph Road 98057 P.O. Box 16367 Phone: 255-3684 Lemay MO 63125 . Page 2 - Don Erickson people-per-dayalccounting wasn't probably verified--just "take my word for it" attitude of RVTI. In any event, that 320 figure would be a change in use; it has never had 320 people there each day, I am sure. What about its last change of use? Did RVTI ever get a conditional use or other permit for the change to a higher educational institu- tion fran an elementary school? There ARE different needs in those uses. As to the last sentence in the third paragraph, don't be putting wrong words in my mouth relative the,problem of::on-street parking:in• front of:residences on Garden. If this is an official statement, i.e. , that I didn't care about this •issue or that it was "secondary" to the need to keep the last visage of usable open space in North Renton, then the officials of Renton indeed have short memories. One shouldn't have to think back very far--to the' set4ement of the Horbach lawsuit, for instance--to remember that the North Renton/Kennydale,Neighborhood Defense Fund held out tenaciously for protection of Garden Avenue located south of North 4th. In fact, we spent our longest period of time fight- ing on that issue, including, if pro-rated, our largest amount of money. Please try to keep the issues right. We NEVER indicated what's primary, secondary or tertiary. 4. Staff had no: right to present my "minimum" proposal which was non-existent, but if it did exist, why would you present my "minimum" proposal? I could have done that. Again, I thoughtl you were negotiating for the residents at that time, not presenting any kind of minimum,whether fact or fiction, that would encroach so heavily on our area. You should have been negotiating on all issues for the city's residents to see what the residents could gain. Period. The last sentence of that paragraph said that staff considered you had a major concession from the District and RVTI. RVTI was making sane concessions? Who are they to make concessions? We, the citizens of the Renton School District, own that facility, not RVTI. . They may eventually steal it (legally) , but not • without a fight.„ When residents, though, make "concessions" or asked to "compromise" with development, only the residents lose. On any "compromise," development wins something. This is getting too tedious,disputing your letter sentence by sentence. Suffice it to say, that there is disagreement in every paragraph and most of the sentences. I will go directly to the' last page (page 3) , first paragraph, where it appears that the city is placing us in another Catch 22 situation and perhaps may even be setting another trap for us as happened in the Boeing noise mitigations where the administration and we appellants had aan agreement, even a written one (signed by officials of the City of Renton) , that went down to the last day for the court suit which had been prepared and awaiting word fran the administration. Then, after the appeal to court was lost, the city changed its: collective mind, and we were had. Although you may not think you were intending to do that to us again, that is exactly the way we see it, intended or not. 'We can lose our appeal date which is up Monday the 8th, and there is nothing in this paragraph that guarantees anything, and even if it did, we found out the city's word, although sincerely given at the time, isn't always kept when given to residents if a development wants something else. • But, Don, you never did answer a basic point I made in my last letter, i.e. , whether or not the stafflseriously considered the input that was asked for in the first notice (Declaration of Non-Significance--Mitigated) . Again, what is your response to those letters? Did they get considered? What your process says to us is that your staff publishes such: a,notice of non-significance, asks for coiuutients, forgets the comments, does not change your three puny "mitigations" because .they are so wonderful even though you admitted then and in your last letter that there were sane issues, does not notify the people who commented that the appeal period was running, that your only notifica- tion was a notice in the paper. Why didn't you consider our issues submitted? And why didn't you notify us the appeal period was running? I'm ashamed of the City of Renton. . .again. !'. With confusion and exasperation, Versie Vaupel ' PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF RENTON September 27, 1990 OCT - 7990 Mr. Robert Jones Editorial Page • Valley Daily News P. 0. Box 130 Kent Ira 98035 Dear Bob Jones: I wanted to talk with you about this issue prior to my leaving Renton for, my fall trip of five to six weeks, but City Hall issues and work sdbedule kept postponing it. I have a problem with something that happened in last spring (or winter) session of the State Legislature, and I believe that people who are focused on local issues ' and equity would be as upset as T am. Let me pass it by you. The Legislature, in its infinite stupidity as I see it, passed a bill out that allows the five vocational-technical institutes to spin off fran the local school districts to which they had been attached for administration only. I don't have much of a prob- lem with that part so much, except that local school district taxpayers, such as Renton School District, helped to fund the capital improvement building program with from 10 to 20 percent via a•capital levy passed•by the voters who live only in the Renton School District. What happens to taxpayers' (local people's) investment -when the RVTI goes bye-bye? To me, that's bad enough, but when one considers the fact that RVTI's service area is so much larger than the Renton School District's servic t puts sanething into perspective for me: Here, all these years local taxes paidfor those 'buildings in part through their regular share of ,State and Federal taxes:, as all taxpayers do through • their pro-rata share of such monies, but Renton-only taxpayers had to pay'the addi- tional capital levies that were passed and paid far ONLY by the smaller. service area of Renton School District. One should take scaled maps of ,'each and superimpose one service area:over-the;.bther,:.: and a.person could readily'see.the equity involved. •(I always contended that, if we local taxpayers were passing and paying the extra levies, we local'taxpayers should get .a break an the tuition fees foriciasses, '.but not.so.) To roughly put it into perspective without any maps with'me, I would tell you that the Renton Voc-Tech service area covers a boundary roughly from Pierce County line to north of the Seattle Central area, then fiuiu the west at Vashon Island to the Kittitas County line on the Past. Many, many. school districts are within those boun- daries; yet only Renton School District carried the extra levies for RVTI. Remember • that the Renton School District is very, very small in comparison to the regional educational institution of RVTI, •merely within and surrounding the boundaries of the City,of Renton. If the District has surplus buildings, then sell than and put them back on the tax rolls. Then, they might be able to pay for sane programs they're cutting now. - That's not the end of my woeful tale of equity or lack thereof. That strange bill ' in the Legislature I' mentioned above not only allows the spin-off with their taking with them as a State institution the property we passed levies for (10 to 20 percent) , but it also authorizes RVTI to take with them whatever other properties they are in possession of on the effective date! •I 1 /r Page 2 - Mr. Jones How greedy will RVTI be? Will this regional institution take title to all the schools and equipment they presently use away f.cum us local taxpayers? Evidently that is the rase of our old historical school of Sartori Elementary School now • converted for shop apprenticeship classes and whatever else may cane there in the future. • Remember, that school (and perhaps another one or two, who knows?) belongs to the citizens of the Renton School District ONLY. If RVTI takes it or any other similarly situated, that would be a case of legalized thievery.as .I see it: And perhaps a taxpayers' suit could keep that fran happening. What do you think about that, you newspaper people who editorialize on equity and fairness? Please call me collect at 314-894-3895 if you wish. I do not authorize publication of this letter at this time but may later. Yours truly, • Versie Vaupel Tempo. : PO Box 16367, Lemay MO 63125 . 1-314-894-3895 Perm. : PO Box 755, Renton W7 98057 • • 255-3684 &Versie Vaupel - . Warren1-A14-894-3895 �oU� — ! FederatedStaesof 1 i—41 9 -'y Micronesia -- 2556 Telegraph_Road VIA'L 1 o' v- - Ao,i tL , o f! !-°�u' � L 5 Box 16367 -`�'A` IL', L°e:! 1—,'� *P.O. _ . i emay MO 63125 '6 OCT �"" °usnQ s' rohA r - /:�c�U l$80 �,i`"--sue-—. *Le. h USAZS I, Mr. Don Erickson Zoning Administrator City of Penton., 200 Mill Av S Renton WA 98055 4111 . • ! !!i! { ! ?i! c(mil! t:i : l:Ylt .ai:1:ssx1(tti t:._:i:3:;v1:If t i i i RENTON SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 403 SARTORI SA-070-90 DATE ACTION 06/26/90 Project received 07/27/90 Technical Advisory Committee 08/01/90 Environmental Review Committee \ k 08/03/90 Property owners within 300 feet notified 08/06/90- Comment Period 08/21/90 08/07/90 Site posted for comment period 08/07/90 Letter from WSDOT 08/20/90 Letter from Marjorie Richter 08/20/90 Letter from Versie Vaupel 08/21/90 Letter from Darrell Igelmund 08/21/90 Letter from Yuhl &Associates (School's engineer) 08/21/90 Letter from Metro 08/21/90 Due to comments received during comment period, project was not put into appeal period. 08/24/90 Meeting with Versie Vaupel 08/27/90 Meeting with Versie Vaupel 08/29/90 Meeting with Renton School District 09/07/90 Meeting with Versie Vaupel 09/11/90 Meeting with Sam Chastain and Versie Vaupel 09/17/90 Meeting with School District 09/25/90 Site posted for appeal period 09/25/90- Appeal Period 10-08-90 10/8/90 Appeal of Administrative Determination received 10/8/90 Appeal of DNS-Mitigated received 10-30-90 Tentative Hearing Examiner i { ' •' CITY OF RENTON I Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Earl Clymer, Mayor Lynn Guttmann, Administrator October 3, 1990 Versie Vaupel 2856 Telegraph Road P.O. Box 16367 Lamay, MO 63125 Dear Ms.Vaupel: Thank you for your FAX which I received September 27th, after lunch.: I have lead It and am very disheartened that you have apparently misconstrued both my and Mark Pywell's actions on this project - particularly when we thought we were working on the community's behalf. As you may recall, about a month ago, Mark and I walked to the site with you and at that time, you expressed your concerns about the lack of play space for young children in the neighborhood. As you will recall, we initially talked about an area large enough for a "big toy" and an area where children could play catch. When we arrived at the site, we met up with Warren and then talked about RVTI's proposed parking lot layout. During this discussion, we and walked the grounds. We talked;about possible play areas and the need to screen windows from flying balls. We also talked about the possibility of the RVTI providing off- site parking on School District #403's maintenance site across NE 4th Street. We also discussed the P-1 zone and whether an expansion was a change in use and noise issues related to hours of operations, as well as the on-street parking problems on Garden Avenue and the possibility of using "resident parking only" signs on the east side of the street. Your major concern appeared to be open space and we talked about the possibility of leaving a portion of the existing open space, that RVTI wants to develop as their on- site parking to relieve on-street parking on Garden Avenue North, for kids play space. Staff agreed at that time to "see what'we could do in negotiating what we said was really a non-SEPA issue with the School District." We also agreed to look into the use issue to see if there was a change of use that would require the District's application to go before the Hearing Examiner. Following our,tour with you, Mark and I met with the School District and RVTI. They volunteered to set aside approximately 25 percent of the large open space on the north side of the school for a "children's play area". At this time, I also researched the zoning code and determined that since governmental buildings such as"schools" are a principal permitted use in the 'P-1 zone and there had been no change in use-(still educational), there was no need for this application to referred to the Hearing Examiner as a conditional use. And from a site plan review standpoint, because their proposal involves less than 300 parking spaces, 1,said it was not required to be reviewed by the Hearing Examiner,.but rather can be handled administratively by the Site Plan Review Committee. On September 7, 1990, Mark Pywell and I again met with you and discussed the District's latest offer. At that meeting, you said their offer was ridiculous and drew a line on their site plan that approximately lined up with the back of the school. You indicated.that this would be the minimum open space acceptable from your and the citizens you represented standpoint. You also again brought up the issue as to whether there was a change of use if RVTI expanded their use of the Sartori School and cited a provision in the P-1 zone pertaining to noise. Mark and I explained to you that RVTI's indicated use of;the site did not appear to be a change of use, but rather was an expansion of the existing "principal" permitted school use. I explained that we had researched this issue and found that governmental "schools" Were a principal permitted use. Regarding the noise issue, Mark and I indicated that you had raised a legitimate point, but noted that the reference you cited referred to "truck traffic and other noise normally associated with an operation." We said we did not believe this provision applied to normal accessory parking-related noises. Mark had gotten 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton. Washington 9R05S - r)n6) '1c.., rsQ Versie Vaupel Sartori-New Parking October 3, 1990 Page 2 • figures indicating that the maximum number of faculty and students would be approximately 320 persons per day. We also discussed the on-street parking issue, which you now believed was secondary to the need to keep the last visage of usable open space in North Renton. Based upon our meeting of September 7th, Mark, and I again met with the RVTI and School District representatives on September 17th to go over the Impacts of expanding both the use within the school as well as their accessory parking lot. We also wanted to discuss the "open space" Issue further and see if a compromise could be achieved. Staff presented your "minimum" proposal and those in attendance, after considerable discussion amongst themselves, agreed to seriously explore;it, noting however, that there were possible drainage issues that needed to be studied in more detail because of existing grades before they could make a final commitment. Staff considered this to be a major concession on the District and RVTI's part. On September 18th, 'Mark and I again met with you to go over the School District's latest offer in terms of dealing with the open space issue. At that meeting, you indicated that you were not sure you could agree to go along with their proposed revision, feeling at this time that it might not be in the "citizens" interest to give any of the open space up. You asked whether they could park at the south end of the existing parking lot and I explained that this was the servicevehicle parking area. At this meeting, I also explained to you that I was hoping that you would accept their proposed modifications (their'original proposal was to pave virtually all of the open space area on the north side of the school for parking); so that they could begin reviewing the drainage issues and modify their drawings for Site Plan Review.' I explained to you that rather than appealing their SEPA determination now, it might be preferable to have the District to proceed with revisions to their site plan now since an appeal on their initial parking layout would not give the community the opportunity to see what the new parking layout and community open space would look like. Although Site Plan Review for a project of this size is typically done administratively, I said that I would recommend to the ERC that the revised parking lot layout with increased open space go to the Hearing Examiner for a public hearing so that the community, by not appealing now, would still have a public forum in which to address the project. I also noted that the Hearing Examiner hasithe authority to modify SEPA mitigation measures if these, at that time,were still felt to be an issue. I told you that if you did decide to file an appeal at this time, I did not know whether the School District would want to proceed with modifications to their site plan until afterthe appeal had been resolved. I also said that staff were reluctant to continue negotiating between the parties on the community open space issue while there was a pending environmental appeal on the District's Initial parking lot proposal. As I tried to explain to you, the community open space issue is really a separate issue from that of mitigating the environmental impacts of the proposed parking lot. It is not, under SEPA, a mitigation measure for RVTI's proposed parking lot since it would be hard to show a nexus between the impacts of parking spaces and the amount of open space available to the community your group is seeking G Although the School District and RVTI now appear willing to modify their proposal to provide a much]more substantial amount of community available open space, by voluntarily deleting a number of parking spaces, this would substantially alter their previous proposal and probably be considered a new or modified application. It is for that reason and that reason alone that I was asking for some indication from you as to whether you were willing to accept, in principle, RVTI's latest proposed revision which would cut their parking lot back to the line you drew at our September 7th meeting; if the project was referred to lithe Hearing Examiner for site plan review. I asked you, the day before you left for Missouri, to please let me know what you wanted us to do. You were obviously rushed and said you or your attorney would get back with us. Neither Mark nor I had heard back from you until you called on September 25, 1990. Versie Vaupel Sartori-New Parking October 3, 1990 Page 3 I hope this written summary helps clarify the Issues, as we see them, for you. If you want to appeal the District/RVTI's initial application for a new parking lot 'for 76 spaces rather than wait and see if their proposed modifications better reflect the concerns of the North Renton Community, for more open space, you have every right to-do so. If you would rather wait and see what the District and RVTI can come up with under a"revised scheme (based upon your earlier Indication'of what was the minimum acceptable to ! you), we can refer their revised application to the Hearing Examiner (I_ am Assuming the ERC will concur (I with this approach) so that you and the community will still have a public forum to voice any remaining concerns you may have. Again, as a courtesy to me and Mark, I would appreciate knowing what your intentions are so that we can decide whether to continue working with the District at this time on a modified proposal or await an appeal hearing. • What staff and the District now need is some indications as to how you want us to proceed. The School District, as are we, are anxious to get this resolved before this property reverts to the state. We believe that once local control is lost, it will be considerably more difficult to negotiate a resolution. If you have questions or I can clarify things for you, please be sure to call or write. Thank you for your continuing interest. Sincerely, • i Don Erickson, AICP " - Zoning Administrator DKE:kac - cc: Lynn Guttmann - Jim Hanson • ' CITY OF RENTON i. 200 MILL AVENUE SOUTH . RENTON, WA 98055 206-235-2501 FAX# 235-2513 DATE 3 : i-" �`�O J PAGES (EXCLUDING THIS COVER SHEET) ATTENTION: 1re)( 2 (2.$5(P <Jetiratalt.&I L€.rruad O) FROM: --Doryujj �z(51ru Irlc� -Att YI;tXlir0.,1-Or . ' t } 1s • r • (.0 • --• ... • - • - . 4 r i" ti i� LI7Y OF RENTON 09. 26. 90 . 1 1 : 1 4 AM . , . RECEIVED • P 0 1 ' . • SEP 26 1990 . UiLDI . " MAIL BOXES ETC. USA 1W. L1T 'MVL . . , cmKJNtC MAIL SERVICE FACSIMILE• TRANSMITTAL C C V E R S H E E T. • ' DATE: 7/. -&,4 a TIME: •• . MESSAGE REF.# # OF PAGES (INCLUDING COVERSHEET). 1, \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ \ TO: iD 0.4/ & (T r i C/ S'o N FAX # d2 cs 6 3 S _ '/ COMPANY: CI ?^Y o A' /FE 4,TO /V CONTACT i . . • ADDRESS: 07600 V/s k 4, 4 It ' S . _ !, \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ • FROM: _ 1/ e*T5.. 24. P '4 PHONE' /- 3/y4.- g 9 4 - 3 er5''S"". • . . • cem ANY:_.,. g c 6 T� �, NOTE: IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS r� OR PROBLEMS WITH THIS ADDRESS: 1. Q (5a ._ _ /C 3 4 7 ' . TRANSMISSION, NOTIFY THE . 1 CONTACT PERSON AT THE NUMBER INDICATED BELOW \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ TRANSMITTED VIA: If ; MAIL BOXES ETC. USA # FAX # ( 14) $92-9612 3817 T.emay Ferry Road ' CONTACT NAME pave Pu11 Py. St. Louis, MO 63125 . CONTACT # (314) 892-8492 CONTACT HOURS: F. 7:30-6:30 SAT 9-4 \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ \ \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ • CCITT (GROUP) ' FAX MACHINE: COMPATIBILITY PS (MAKE AND .MODEL NUMBER) G. ' ' ' , (GI, G2,. G3) TRANSMIT MODE: NORMAL FINE SUPER FINE I/2STONE RECEIVE MODE: AUTO-2 4--HOUR ( ) MANUAL ( ) ' • \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS: . Q J. 2"6 9 0 l 1 1 : 1 4 AIA . P 0 2 ' ' \ Warren'F. & Vereie Vaupel PLANNING DIVISION 1.31.4-894.3698 CITY OF RENTON September 26, 1990 • 28.50 Telegraph Road P0. Box 16367 SEP 2 6 1990 Limey MO 83126 T : Don Erickson, City of Renton FAX1 # 314-892-96RECEIVED I • Re; Sartori .playground I I ' it's really difficult for me to und-rstand how we can so misunderstand each other on two or three basic points; especially the point at which wit 'would definitely "can- promise" and on whether or not this project would go on to; the Hearing Examiner with- cut the necessity of appeal by citi ens. As to the latter, the first time y saw the back part of the school yard, you in- dicated to me that, yes, this 'kind f a project would need; to go to the Hearing Ex- aminer based on obviously a change f use; etc, etc. Now you say, that was contingent on our accepting a "Compromise" whe e you thought we had "drawn aline in the grass," ' If..you will remember, we h d not discussed any "line" anywhere at that time. Later, we also discussed that perha s the WTI might be able to use one, two Or three rows of parking directly east of th . present driveway frorri N. 4th. Nothing was firm . frau our side. You said you would o into negotiations, but you did not say that you were going in with an offer from' us on anything. I thought you were going into nego- . tiations with RV'I'I to see what the ity could get from them in the way of concessions . based on all our suggestions in the three letters suhtt.itted, and that you would take what you could get..and what the community needed to the Hearing Examiner. You indi- ' W cated your final mitigations would, ,ibe drawn up. . And that reminds ne of something y. said. on the phone' yesterday: You said that,• un- less we accepted the offer from - II, we Citizens would mar have to appeal on our. own and that the matter would go t• the Hearing Examiner direct without the st-aff going any further with additional 'tigations. . Isn't that aborting the _entire process, Don? It. has always been. that the city prints a notice that the application is ' , that people have x-n umber of days to comment, and that after the comments were in, t e staff would make its i final recommendations based on the comments. Yet, you seen to now be saying that staff won't bother further with 'Our' ctitnents if we are going to ap ,-al it. How can we appeal' it until we know your final rni.tigation requirements? If you are now saying nothing further will be, done now, that the city will live with e puny items you first issued, then the citizens and the city would lose, and only zis regional institution that pays no taxes will win. What happened -to the process You indicated you had concerns; now you say ,.. you will live with those three mit gation measures that have little or no significance as to impacts on North Renton. Yo ' indicated to me that your concerns included some mitigation measures to relieve therpeople on Garden directly uppvsite the school, that some type of residential-zone parlc ng could be installed, and you seamed to share my concern 'expressed by some women students in the past that 'women could be in danger back there without suithle securi-y lighting. • It really bothers me, Lon, that we citizens went to the time, expense and worry to get together with advisers to put together a long list of concerns and now not to • have them considered in mitigation measures. I would be delighted and immensely pleased to bear that some of major concerns will be included as mitigations recommended to,'the Hearing Examiner' .if we go that route. ‘-e..e........4L.4.4,. Lf •-a-'14-'52-* .. Versio Vaupel ' ..- ,j Y OF RENTON` RECEIVED 09. 2 0.. 90- i11 : 14 AM / P 0 1 : . ii SEP 2 6 1990 WALD! 1 • I, MAIL BOXES ETC. USA MIFIRIMEArrAff M 1 ., ELECIRONIC MAIL SERVICE FACSIMILE TRANSMITTAL COVERSHEET DATE: 74-411; d TIME: MESSAGE RED'. # 1 # OF PAGES (INCLUDING COVERSHEET) "\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\-\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ TO:___i� FAX # �cl,6 0 5 a2 5-/„1 COMPANY: C-,`r a _4/ CONTACT ADDRESS: 0,7 r)' /1./1 I`1_4 4- 1/, ' 5. . \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ZX\\\\\\\\\\ FROM: r'eq '2 11& . "4 .__ PHONE# /-- 3/y41 9 c- 3 J'S' celormuTY: .A g s l¢ 1 4 4 NOTE: IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS OR' PROBLEMS WITH THIS ADDRESS: 7. 4 act .r_ /6` 3 ' 7 TRANSMISSION, NOTIFY THE THE e A j M O � 3 / 6 f CNUMBERTINDICATEDT 'r't BELOW \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ ',TRANSMITTED VIA: MAIL BOXES ETC. USA #__116 FAX # (13 4) $92-9 12-- - ,.,._ 3817 Lay Ferry Road CONTACT NAME have Pulley St. Louis, MO 1, 63125 _ CONTACT # (314) 892-8492 CONTACT HOURS:. M-F.. 7:30-6:30 SAT 9-4 \\\\\\\\\\\\\\ \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ . CCITT (GROUP)'"==-. FAX MACHINE; H COMPATIBILITY # 'S ;:' (MAKE AND MODEL NUMBER) (Gi, G2, G3) ' TRANSMIT MODE: NORMAL FINE SUPER FINE 1/2 TONE RECEIVE MODE: " AUTO-2 4--HOUR ( ) MANUAL ( ) \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS: 1 'I ; \\\\\\\`\\\\\\\ \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ 1 - 26. 90 ig 1 : 14 .1M./1 P02 , rd q"• Warren F. Er Ver&il Vaupel PLANNING DIVISION 1-314-B94.3898 CITY OF RENTON September 26, 199p 2B58 Telegraph Road P.O. Box 18387 SEP 2 6 1990 Lemey MO 83125 • To: Don Erickson, City of Renton FAX # 14-992- 614 RECEIVED Re: Sartori playground It's really difficult forme to understand how we can so misunderstand each other on two or three bam,ie points, especially the point at which we would definitely "can- promise" and on -whether or not this project would go on to the Hearing Examiner with- out the necessity of appeal by citizens. As to the latter, the first time you saw the back part of the school yard, you in- dicated to me that, yes, this kind of a project would need to go to the Hearing Ex- aminer based on obviously a change of use, etc, etc. Now you say that was contingent on our accepting a "ccmprcmise" where you thought we had "drawn a line in the grass," z_f. you will reiaer, we had not discussed any "line" anywhere at that time. Later, we also discussed that perhaps the WTI might be able to use one, two or three rows of parking directly east of the present driveway fran N. 4th. Nothing was fin'n from our side. You said you would go into negotiations, but you did not say that you • • were going in with an offer fL011l us on anything. I thought you were going into nego- tiations with WTI to see what the city could get from then in the way of concessions based on all our suggestions in the three letters submitted, and that you would take what you could get and what the conmunity needed to the Hearing Examiner. You indi- . cated your final mitigations would be drawn up. And that reninde me of something you said. on the phone yesterday: You said that, un- less we accepted the offer fain RVTI, we citizens would now have to appeal on our awn and that the matter would go to the Hearing Examiner direct without the staff going any further with additional mitigations. Isn't that aborting the entire process, Don? It has always been that the city prints a notice that the application is in, that people have x-number of days to comment, and that after the eonuents were in, the staff would make its final recommendations based on the comments; Yet, you seen to now be saying that staff won't bother further with 'our comments if we are going to appeal it. How can we appeal it until we know your final mitigation re ,ti:ret nts? If you are new saying nothing further will be done now, that the city will live with the puny items you first issued, then the citizens and the city would lose, and only this regional institution that pays no taxes will win. What happened to the process? You indicated you had concerns; nag you say you will live with those three mitigation measures that have little or no significance as to impacts on North Renton. You indicated to me that your concerns included sane mitigation measures to relieve the people on Garden directly opposite the school, that sane type of residential-zone parking could be installed, and you seamed to share my concern expressed by some women students in the past that warren could be in danger back there without suitable security lighting. It really bothers me, Don, that we citizens went to the time, expense and worry to get together with advisers to put together a long list of concerns and now not to have them considered in mitigation measures. I would be delighted and immensely pleased to hear; that sane of major concerns will be included as mitigations recommended to the Hearing Examiner if we go that route. Versia? Vaupel 11 I, Y/A" UHL & (206) 641-2886 12828 NORTHUP WAY ASSOCIATES BELLEVUE, WA 98005 • September 24, 1990 City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 Attn: Mr. Mark Pywell Re: Sartori New Parking ECF SA 070-90 Dear Mark: I've attached three copies of the 8-1/2 x 11 enlarged Site Plan which you requested at our meeting. , I've added the location of both the new and existing parking which you requested at our meeting of the 17th. fJ Sincerely yours, Michael H. Yuhl, P.E. Enclosure as Stated cc: Renton School District No. 403 with enclosure MHY:c CITY OF RENTON RECEIVED . SEP 2 5 1990 BUILDING DIVISION LJ RENTON SCHOOL DL- MAINTENANCE YARD : ` N • C • .GRAPHIC SCALE • 1". = 100' ► hill , 1 1 0' - 50' 100' 150' ' '' - 1 TI . . , . • 1 SARTORI , , • HEALTH OCCUPATIONS - N. 4t h' S T. do APPRENTICESHIP CENTER . . ' JIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII L . , •11- ii• • ' — NEW PARKING - _ , • ,� calffil IIIII-D, , _ _., - - • ,, ..._. , . . • _ bk I . . — . '. ./ I — . IIIIII 1 EXISTING Z — PARKING...) , — 1)=377 - - .•>' ' . . . W Q — _ _ -/y j =1011111 I. 1 - • 11 11 II 1111 - N. 3rd ' ST. •SINGLE FAMILY HOUSES 1 I�' i . I ' 1 CITI .OF RENTON Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Earl Clymer, Mayor Lynn Guttmann, Administrator September 21, 1990 Mike Yuhl 12929 Northup Way, #300 Bellevue,WA 98005 • SUBJECT: Sartori- New Parking ECF;SA-070-90 Dear Mr. Yuhl: This letter is to inform you that the comment period has ended for the Determination of Non-Significance- Mitigated for the above-referenced project. Comments were received and copies are enclosed. The Committee's determination is final and may be appealed to the City's Hearing Examiner no later than 5:00 p.m. on October 8, 1990. To appeal this Declaration, you must file your appeal document with the hearing examiner within fourteen (14) days of the date the Declaration of Non-Significance is final or the Declaration of Significance has been published in the official city newspaper. See City Code Section 4-6-23, RCW 43.21C.075 and WAC 197-11-680 for further details. There shall be only one appeal of a Declaration of Non-Significance or Declaration of Significance, and if an appeal has already been filed, your appeal may be joined with the prior appeal for hearing or may be dismissed if the other appeal has already been heard. Any appeal must state clearly why the determination should be revised and must be accompanied by a non-refundable$75.00 filing fee. If you have questions or desire clarification of the above, please call Mark Pywell at 235-2550. Environme t I Committee, Donald K. Erickson, AICP Secretary Enclosures cc: Renton School Dist. #403 435 Main Ave 8 Renton,WA 98055 • • i • I strtapel/DKE/kac 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2631 • CITY OF RENTON OCT 0 2 1990 =CEIVED ..li(Y CLERK'S OFFICE 51067 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION Ka th 1 PPn HnnvP r ,being first duly sworn on oath states that he/she is the Chief Clerk of the NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL VALLEY DAILY NEWS REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTON • Kent Edition • Renton Edition • Auburn Edition The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a Determination of Non- Significance - Mitigated for the following Daily newspapers published six (6) times a week. That said newspapers project(s) under the authority of the Renton are legal newspapers and are now and have been for more than six Municipal Code. 1 he following r months prior to the date of publication referred to, printed and published have completed a mitigation process: in the English language continually as daily newspapers in Kent, King SATORI-NEW PARKING County, Washington. The Valley Daily News has been approved as a legal ECF;SA-070-90 The applicant proposes to convert a newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for grassed play field of the former elementary King County. school into a paved and landscaped 76 car parking lot. The project is located at 315 Garden Avenue North. The notice in the exact form attached, was published in the Kent Edition Further information regarding this action XXX , Renton Edition XXX , Auburn Edition XXX , (and not in is available in the Development Services Division, Third Floor, Municipal Building, supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers Renton, Washington, 235-2550. This Deter- during the below stated period. The annexed notice a P lib 1 it- Not; r P mination in FINAL. To appeal this Declara- tion, you must file your appeal document (Environmental Determination) 4680 with the hearing examiner within fourteen (14) days of the date of the Declaration of Non-significance is final or the Declaration waspublished on Sept . 2 4 , 19 9 0 of Significance has been published in the official city newspaper. See City Code Sec- tion 4-6-23, RCW 43.21C.075 and WAC 197-11-680 for further details. There shall The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the be only one appeal of a Declaration of Non- sum of$ c 4 Q S Significance or Declaration of Significance, and if an appeal has already been filed, your appeal may be joined with the prior ` laEa. appeal hearing may be dismissed if the otherer appeal hass already been heard. This appeal period which will end at 5:00 p.m.on October 8, 1990.Any appeal of this decision may be made to the City's Hearing Examiner, Municipal Building, 200 Mill Ave- Subscribed and sworn before me this 2 5.th day of Sept • 1 O 0 nue South, Renton, Washington 98055. An appeal must state clearly, in writing, why the Determination should be revised and must be accompanied by a non-refundable $75.00 filing fee. Published in the Valley Daily News Sep- tember 24, 1990. 4680 No ry Public for the State of Washington residing at Auburn, King County, Washington VDN#87 Revised 4/89 NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a Determination of Non-Significance- Mitigated for the following project(s) under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code. The following Applicant(s) have completed a mitigation process: SARTORI - NEW PARKING ECF;SA-070-90 The applicant proposes to convert a grassed play field of the former elementary school into a paved and landscaped 76 car parking lot. The project is located at 315 Garden Avenue North. Further information regarding this action is available in the Development Services Division, Third Floor, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington, 235-2550. This Determination is FINAL. To appeal this Declaration, you must file your appeal document with the hearing examiner within fourteen (14) days of the date the Declaration of Non-significance is final or the Declaration of Significance has been published in the official city newspaper. See City Code Section 4-6-23, ROW 43.21 C.075 and WAC 197-11-680 for further details. There shall be only one appeal of a Declaration of Non-Significance or Declaration of Significance, and if an appeal has already been filed, your appeal may be joined with the prior appeal for hearing or may be dismissed if the other appeal has already been heard. This appeal period which will end at 5:00 p.m. on October 8, 1990. Any appeal of this decision may be made to the City's Hearing Examiner, Municipal Building, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, Washington 98055. An appeal must state clearly, in writing, why the Determination should be revised and must be accompanied by a non-refundable$75.00 filing fee. Publication Date: September 24, 1990 Account No. 51067 • pubnot FJOTICEf ENVIRONMENTAL DECLARATION APPLICATION NO. ECF;SA-070-90 PROPOSED ACTION SARTORI NEW PARKING RENTON SCHOOL DIST 403 THE APPLICANT PROPOSES TO CONVERT A GRASSED PLAYFIELD OF THE FORMER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL INTO A PAVED AND LANDSCAPED 76 CAR PARKING LOT. GENERAL LOCATION AND OR ADDRESS 315 GARDEN AVENUE NORTH POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE [E.R.C.] HAS DETERMINED THAT THE , PROPOSED ACTION EJDOES NrIOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT ❑WILL I►NILL NOT BE REQUIRED. THE CITY OF RENTON WILL NOT ACT ON THIS PROPOSAL FOR 15 DAYS FROM THE DATE BELOW. COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY AN APPEAL OF THE ABOVE DETERMINATION MAY • BE FILED WITH THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER BY 5:00 P.M., OCTOBER 8, 1990 • FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON PLANNING PLANNING DIVISION AT 235-2550. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION _ CERTIFICATION . i • , - HEREBY CERTIFY THAT �j/ee- COPIES OF HE ABOVE DOCUMENT WERE POSTED BY ME 'IN * *Ck CONSPICUOUS LACES ON OR NEARBY THE DESCRIBED PROPERTY ON ri /rg, ,,%o ims44• 4 ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to C�C3ie ° ♦ Notary Public, in and for the St$te of uas S. • a residing in .• dd'' ton=.°o� ' day of � �o`thb `' •SIGNED : UQ . � . i ♦♦♦♦♦®OA° 9. 199;'•••O°oho`' ®°O#00e�AS H,MGC Ss* I ' NOTICE ENVIRONMENTAL DEcLARATIoN. ECF;SA-070-90 APPLICATION NO. PROPOSED ACTION SARTORI - NEW PARKING RENTON SCHOOL DIST 403 THE APPLICANT PROPOSES TO CONVERT A GRASSED PLAYFIELD OF THE FORMER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL INTO A PAVED AND LANDSCAPED 76 CAR PARKING LOT. . I GENERAL LOCATION AND OR ADDRESS 315 GARDEN AVENUE NORTH POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE I E.R.C. ) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION ODOES XJ:IDES 1NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT DWILL ►/VILL RIOT BE REQUIRED. THE CITY OF RENTON WILL NOT ACT ON THIS PROPOSAL FOR 15 DAYS FROM THE DATE BELOW. COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY AN APPEAL OF THE ABOVE DETERMINATION MAY BE . FILED WITH THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER BY 5:00 P.M., OCTOBER 8, 1990 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON PLANNING DIVISION AT 2 3 5-2 5 50. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION envpir NORTH RENTON/KENNYDALE NEIGHBORHOOD DEFENSE FUND • P. 0. Box 755 Renton, Washington 98057 August 21, 1990 Community Development Department Environmental Review Committee And All Others Concerned City of Renton Renton, Washington Regarding: Proposed Parking Lot Application at Sartori:. School on Garden Avenue To whom it may concern: Please be reminded that our group has been involved in traffic issues that impact our neighborhoods in Renton and Kennydale. We are concerned about the amount of parking space now being proposed at Sartori and believe the ERC and other staff should take another look at this proposal in light of the consensus obtained by staff and consultants at various public meetings during the last year or so, as well as Resolution 2708, the Neighborhood Protection Plan, Livable Streets and zoning restrictions cov- ered in a previous letter to you by one of our members. { It is important for the City to honor its commitments to the residents and the various communities. We shall appreciate your reconsideration in this matter. Very tr ly yours, Darr A mun Presiden Home address: 3602 Lake Washington Boulevard N. Renton, Washington 98056 CITY OF RENTON E O E ,I V E ;? tG AUG 2 1 1990 1 BUILDING DIVISION CITY OF RENTON RE C El V ED AUG 2 0 1990 August 20, 1990 Versie and Warren F. a �FJr�L1DING DIVISION P. 0. Box 755 Renton . WA 98057 To City of Renton, Community Development Department - Re RVTI; ECF:SA-070-90; SARTORI-NEW PARKING 1 From : Warren and Versie Vaupel, PO Box 755, Renton WA 98057 The parking lot expansion is obviously being designed for more intense use at the Sartori School than has been in the past. The increase in parking space shows there will probably be a five-fold increase in the activity in the school, or at least, will create such a possibility for more intensive use. r I In fact, the P1 Zone specifically limits use of a facility :rom 7:00 am to 7:00 pm because of noise generation into adjacent residential areas. Since the Voc-Tech appears to be expanding its nighttime usage, we would expect a public hearing before the Hearing Examiner in accordance with 4.31.9 D 6. CHECKLIST: An environmental checklist provided by the Renton School District on June 26 is totally inadequate, to put it mildly. It avoids answers to many impacts, but it specifically does not address issues such as: Increased Use and who/what will be its increased use; funding source and costs Stormwater runoff Increased traffic I Increased air pollution Increased noise in a residential area Total disregard for the loss of neighborhood recreational space AIR POLLUTION: Only construction activity impacts on airpollution was considered. It does not consider emissions from potentially five times as many cars. WATER RUNOFF: There is no information that the existing storm water systems are cap- able of handling the increased flow to the Cedar River caused by the creation of more impervious surface. A related question is how much ground around this building can or SHOULD BE covered in or close to the City's sole source aquifer. When one looks at the plat in the file called "General Location," one will note that this facil- ity covers much more than half a block. Yet, with the paving to the rear and the paving of virtually all the ground on the north side of the building and the building itself, there will be such a significant loss of green space where water can seep into the ground naturally. This much paving should not happen to a neighborhood facility, and we question this being a, neighborhood school or institution We want to keep this a neighborhood building and not to have it with an industrial look with all the paved ground. With the proposed paving on the north and the paving in the back, plus the buildings, there would be only relatively small amount of greenery and open space left. • ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH: We are not certain if any of the classes offered at RVTI will potentially expose the neighborhood' to hazardous chemicals or increase the risk of fire and explosions. f 1 NOISE: Noise impacts will increase with the greater activity that can be allowed by the increased parking. Traffic will now be introduced into ,a residential neighborhood after 7:00 pm. In addition, we are unsure if any noise will be introduced due to equip- ment for new classes. • CITY of RENTON ;REcvED AUG 2 0 1990 Page 2 BUILDING DIVISION RECREATION: The School District does not consider disappearance of the orma rec- reactional opportunities formerly available but dismisses it lightly by talking only about some neighbors using it "for walking" and that "parking lot will still be avail- able for walking." Safety would preclude people from walking in a parking lot when ' cars are present. The loss of this recreation area should be compensated for. Since the disappearance of Mothers Park in the north end, this is the only public area around here north of Bronson Way. Smaller kids in particular could make great use of this playground and have done so in the past. Unfortunately, adults from the school building have scared off the youngsters who have tried to play there. Just today, two young boys about nine years old likewise told us that they "were chased off the grounds" by some men. Neighbors tell me that children in the past have had good access to the area, and, in fact, there had been play equipment on the south side of the building, and the north side (where the parking lot is to be) was for ball games, badminton, races, practicing for sports and so on. (The rec plan in the skimpy "mitigations" of "hard court recre- ation facilities" in the parking areas for "patron and neighborhood use" is laughable to us as a replacement for the lost playground for small children--and even for older ones as well. Come now! ) TRANSPORTATION: Basically, there is no discussion of the impacts of the parking lots on the proposed North Renton Neighborhood Protection Plan, Resolution 2708 or the Livable Streets concept. - The citizens went to meeting after meeting after meeting trynro work in harmony with city staff and consultants in order to work out a protection plan including the "livable streets" mentioned above in order to try to make life more bearable for resi- dents who, for much too long, have had to suffer from such great numbers of pass-through traffic along their residential streets. Prior to those numerous meetings and studies, certain people formed a Neighborhood Defense Fund and took the City of Renton and Boeing's developer to court because no real neighborhood traffic mitigations were offered. And now here we are again with yet another development bringing more cars into our area that does not provide any traffic mitigations at all or any monies to contribute or even a TMP (transportation management plan) because of the project's impacts. Our neighborhood protection plan was created over a period of two years to produce idea of livable streets. Increased intensity now endangers that plan. Will it always be thus, and was the City sincere when it draggecyso many of us out so many times to meetings where we came up with the compromise plan? Was our time wasted again? The checklist or other documents in the file when I checked it last Thursday also says nothing about potential clashes on the new turning movements at 4th and Garden. It's very important for the ERC people and new staff people to read or re-read as the case may be the conditions contained in Resolution 2708. That should be required reading for new employees who might be working on North Renton projects. As a matter of fact, if the project is allowed as is, there is concern that RVTI is not participating in the North 4th right-of-way expense or the estimated cost of the traffic improvements already planned to go in later. CUMULATIVE EFFECTS: On project after project, we keep asking questions about the cumulative impacts of small, medium or large proposals. Weinever see a clear-cut re- sponse. Does the City or its consultants not know how to respond to cumulative impacts, or do they choose to ignore such an important aspect in developments? The City so often seems to issue decisions or permits "with no adverse impacts," and yet there has to be a day of reckoning of who really pays for cumulative impacts. We need better assessments on cumulative impacts. On this one, what do you say this time about cumulative impacts? FUNDING: Where is the funding for this project coming from? Why can't the school district rent surplus property across the street? Why can't they park in front of the bus maintenance building after those employees quit for thelday? CITY OF RENTON RECEIVED Page 3 AB 2 0 1990 1 BUILDING DIVISION PARKING ORDINANCE: Renton Technical Institute is not an elementary school; for in- stance, where parking ordinances only require one parking space for each employee. The Voc-Tech Institute is an educational institution of higher learning, i.e. , a post-secondary educational institute which appears to require a conditional use permit instead of the present application for a site plan approval for a parking lot, which is being considered only by staff without a hearing. The parking lot instead suggests that this is no longer a neighborhood function as an elementary school or community center but instead functions as a regional institute which serves an area much larger. . .larger not only of the City or the school district but has a service area considerably beyond those limits, like from near the Seattle Central Area to the Pierce County like and west to the Sound and east to the Cascade foothills. There's nothing "neighborhood" about those boundaries. HAULING ROUTES: What with the turnover in personnel at City Hall, there may be none left there who remembers how adamant the neighborhood has been concerning hauling routes and ingress and egress for deliveries. This is for all times but particularly true during construction. We insist that all trucks and equipment coming to and from the site be directed either north or south on Park only and not be allowed to enter onto any residential street such as Garden, Third, Fourth west of Park, and so on. NEEDS: While we do indeed recognize some parking needs in order to keep the "patrons" of RVTI from parking in front of residences, there should be ample space behind the school for even more than the 80 mentioned in the checklist. But one wonders what is going to happen at Sartori where the request is for those 80 spaces, plus the 76 being looked at in this application. Cars totally 156 should require more than a mere site application. We notice, too, that "storage" was mentioned. Is there a new storage building, or what exactly does this mean? Incidentally, no matter how many parking stalls you build for the Institute, there will always be those people who will continue to park in front of residences who wouldn't want to go to the trouble of entering your parking lots if there is a convenient one on the street. After all a student or whoever can exit the front of the building, probably walk a shorter distance to his car on the street but more importantly he would be making a "quick getaway" without having to exit onto Park or North 4th. Our City's traffic enforcement rates somewhere between low and nil most of the time. GENERAL: The impacts need to be better addressed. There is after all, when one looks at it closely, not just the building of one parking lot, although; that is significant enough to warrant the public hearing we request. There is A complete makeover and expansion of the ground behind Sartori with 80 or more spaces; there is the one mentioned in the public notice of 76 parking stalls; there is the removal of a 12 ft by 32 ft wood frame building; and there is something obscurely mentioned about "storage." Put these all together, you can see that it is a significant development. (A side question: Is there any asbestos in the wood building being removed?) Because there are many impacts and because this is not an elementary school but an edu- cational institution and because of time limits on a P-1 zone, and because of the fact this project is, as stated, considerably more than building a parking lot, we expect this project to be required to have a public hearing before the hearing examiner, which will provide the proper foruinto address all these issues in order to protect the public health, safety and welfare. ' � �M Please notify us of the �►-�..�.�, , 4' appeal deadline. Versie Vaupel ,' Warren F. Vaupel • ::mETR0 „ Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle Exchange Building • 821 Second Ave. • Seattle,WA 98104-1598 PLANNING DIVISION August 20, 1990 CITY OF RENTON AUG 2 1 1990 RECEIVED Environmental Review Committee c/o Don Erickson, Zoning Administrator Current Planning Division Community Development Department 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 Determination of Nonsignificance File No. : ECF-070-90 Sartori - New Parking) Dear Environmental Review Committee: Metro staff has reviewed this proposal and anticipates no significant impacts to water quality or to Metro's wastewater facilities. However, we have the following comments regarding public transportation services. Public Transportation Services Metro staff recommends the above referenced project be required to have a Transportation Management 1 Plan (TMP) that includes the following actions. - Distribute site-appropriate transit and ridesharing information annually to all employees and students. - Display site-appropriate transit and ri1desharing information in prominent public locations. - Appoint a Transportation Coordinator to promote and coordinate the use of public transportation and high occupancy vehicles. - Initiate an alternative work hour program. - Establish a performance goal for high occupancy vehicle use. - Provide preferential parking for high occupancy vehicles. - Provide a financial subsidy for employees or students who use HOV. - Conduct transportation surveys/monitoring. D. Erickson August 20, 1990 Page Two • For assistance in developing and writing the transportation management plan, contact, Carol Thompson, Me'pro Market Development,, at 684-1610 Thank you for opportunity to review, and comment. Sincerely, )3-o-re-via &Jo-- Gregory M. Bush, Manager Environmental Compliance Division GMB:p1g5548 rf EC Munic aallity of Metropolitan Seattle AUG20'90 � � � 4 MET Exchange Building-M.S. 110 �W� r,PB;; 488 .�_ 821 Second Ave.,Seattle,WA 98104-1598 Environmental Review Committee c/o Don Erickson, Zoning Administrator Current Planning Division Community Development Department 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA. 98055 110 fl:t..l,.1,111,,,, i,.*, *** • . ..•...11:, T '.--71 LTG fk YUHL & Re C E I V ED (206) 641-2886 A AUG 2 1 1990 12828 NORTHUP WAY ASSOCIATES BELLEVUE, WA 98005 LBUILDIN( MOON August 20, 1990 City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 Attn: Mr. Donald K. Erickson, Zoning Administrator Re: Sartori . New Parking ECF SA 070-90 Dear Mr. Erickson: We wish to ask the City's reconsideration of the following conditions contained in your letter of August 3, 1990. Condition #1 a indicates that a revised landscape plan is required for the planting around the boundary and within the parking lots. This is an indefinite requirement inasmuch as it doesn't indicate what changes are required with the landscape plan submitted. The plan submitted is based upon: a. using grass for biofiltration of runoff from the parking lot. b. using low growing shrubs so District security personnel and police can observe the parking lot from the public streets. c. using plant material that people are not likely to dig up and steal. (Flowering shrubs'seem to "walk" out of school facilities.) d. using plant material not viewed as "opulent" by the District's taxpayers. Since this is a parking lot for parking that's already occurring on City streets, it doesn't appear that additional mitigation over and above the landscaping required in the Renton Code for new parking lots would be needed. Condition #1 c states "Replace the paving strip with landscaping along the West boundary of the existing parking lot." We request this reconsideration because this requirement is a mitigation of an existing use that is in a different area from the new parking lot. We believe that the mitigation under SEPA is appropriate only at the location of the new , parking places and not on an existing use. What this proposal would do is provide parking for existing uses. It does not in itself add uses. At present, parking is occurring along Garden Avenue North. I don't believe that the maintenance work on the existing lot, which is patching, curbing and re-striping, is within the permit process. For your information, we have voluntarily reduced the impacts on the two adjacent single family homes: on the West by providing curbing with a 10 ft. setback from the existing fence (parking now occurs to the fence); however budget restraints preclude landscaping the strip and the associated cost of the irrigation system. We request reconsideration of Condition #3, which is the requirement for hard court, recreation-facilities within the existing and proposed area for patron and neighborhood use. The reason for this reconsideration request is to more precisely define what is required. Neighbors indicate that there are undesirable unauthorized after school activities which occur in back of the present school. Providing "recreation activities" in that area provides a reason for people to be there where none now exists - thus increasing police needs. To handle this situation, we request that the proposed Condition #3 be clarified to read "The applicant shall provide one basketball hoop and associated striping at the East edge of the new parking area." We believe that this would provide for,legitimate activities in an area of the school that is remote enough from the backs of the existing homes and remote enough from the school to be able, to the extent possible, to separate a legitimate recreational activity from the others. To make this'�area more usable when cars are parked, we would eliminated the parking stalls along the East side. Sincerely yours, Michael H. YUhl, P.E. cc: Renton School District #403 MHY:c 1 • 300 ME ..aw Avenue .N. Renton, Washington • August 19, 1990 • Community Development Departmnt City of Renton • Renton, Washington Ref.--Proposed Expansion of Parking Lot at Sartori School • To whom it may concern: . There are few of you at City Hall left who know the history of Sartori . I notice from the Environmental Checklist that it is stated the playground was only used for walking now. Be aware that .it is indeed used for walking by both youngand old, but it is sometimes used by youngsters still . It used to be that families took their own badminton sets and volley ball nets , baseballs and bats to the area designated for more parking spaces , I believe 76 more. I would also let you know that kids practiced for track events, etc. on those 'grounds. • At one time, the Park Department also used it for. softball teams. Somewhere along the way, families were lis.couraged. from being on the grounds, I understand, for insurance reasons , the school district forgetting that we as taxpayers are their insurance for getting funds for their insurance. Schools throughout our history, particularly this school , was used for public and community affairs but now' must pay rent for most events. Will the schools be charging the parking lot users too? Residents at one time asked for senior housing there since senior citizens don't drive in and out on a daily basis and would have less impract on our neighbor- hood. Senior housing would also be appropriate there because of proximity to down- town, City Hall , library, restaurants , doctors and the Senior Center For a long time, and especially since the City closed Mothers Park, we have needed a small community park for small children. Area traffic makes it impossible • for small children to cross Bronson Way to get to Liberty Park, plus the fact that it is farther than the Sartori site. And Coulon Park is impossible to walk to due to distance and heavy c.raffic. • Increased parking spaces for the school could be between the school building on the south side (but yvith harriers such as deep hedges , with exit and entrance ways to and from Park. Residents Dn Garden should be relieved of all day and any night parking in front of their hoic:s by students and teachers , so we do favor some increased parking spaces , but the amourt of spaces being requested is far too many for the tight confines around the school . When the Senior Center was located: at Sartori , the police enforced two-hour parking., and cars were regularly ticketed, but not now. We fear any intensive use for the school . The proposed parking is, as I said, far too much for North Renton in this general area. Our group has argued that more and more paving to benefit single occupancy vehicles is not needed; the school should require carpooling or using buses. The City of Renton's Resolution 2708 which we went to court to obtain requires no more traffic in the residential area. Further, if this parking is being planned for the Alternative School , we would also insist that this is not the place for such training, either. We have had enough problems in general that we deserve a low intensity use CITY OF RENTON • Yours ver tru y, E 9 V E AUG 2 0 1990 1a orie "ichter BUILDING DIVISION AMMObk Washington State VifirDepartment of Transportation PL11NN1 'iar�ntsontation r rans or District 1 CITY OF AFh1 t �i P 15:1:'5 S.F.30111 PIncn Bellevue,Washington 9800/ AUG — 9 199U DATE: August 7 , 1990 RECEN TO: Don Erickson, Chief, Current Planning Planning Division Public Works Department j 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 R-1 -Eo r- FROM: JAMES L. LUTZ, P. E. , Utilities/Developer Engineer Washington State Department of Transportation District 1 15325 SE 30th Place, MS 113 Bellevue, WA 98007-6597 1 ' This letter is in response tot the Mitigated Determination of Non-Significance) documents that we received from the City of Rention on August 6, 1990. i X We have reviewed the subject documents and have determined . that the traffic generated by these developments will not have a significant adverse impact upon any state highways. File No. SR No. atrbOrC/vJuz" s ECF-057-90 1405 'ev7Z ECF-069-90 405 s4e-miti ECF-070-90 900 Please contact Robert Eichelsdoerfer of my Developer Services section at PHONE: 562-4297, SCAN 638-4297, if you have any questions. w CITY OF RENTON Department of Planning/Building/Public Works `-, . PM • 200 Mill Avenue South -Renton, Washington 98055 /3s0 pLANNIpt ' ' m,�e5 i4C7 . �- CITY OF RENTON—.., AUG 1 3 1990 RECEIVED Jack Jahn & Rose Rossi 325 Meadow Ave. N. Renton, Wa. 9fi(l55 {{ a _ RETURN TO SENQER _ NO FORWARD ORDER ON FILE UNABLE TO FORWARD _ -.lADDRESSE� ' i RETURNTO SENDER urK NgY r ,_--i4 m CHI cs1 ag II :env in RETURN TO SENDER V„,' ` J vv d ' NOTICE OF PENDING SITE PLAN APPROVAL . RENTON, WASHINGTON A Site Plan Application has been filed and accepted with the Developmnet Services Division of the City of Renton. The following briefly describes the application and the necessary Public Approvals. 1 DESCRIPTION: Sartori- New Parking ' ECF;SA-070-90 The applicant proposes to convert a grassed play field of the former elementary school into a paved and landscaped 76 car parking lot. • 1 i GENERAL LOCATION: 315 Garden Avenue North PUBLIC APPROVALS: 1 Environmental Review Site Plan Approval The application can be reviewed in the Development Services Division located on the third floor of Renton City Hall. Comments will be accepted anytime prior to Public Hearings, during Public Hearings, or prior to an administrative site plan approval. For further information on the application or dates of final action by the City, please contact the Development Services Division, at 235-2550. I N. 5th ST. -_ GRAPHIC SCALE r'i ' 1" = 200' a ❑ - ND 111111 , I I I I IDo g o i ,00 soo 300 ti D ❑ I $ ccTi SARTORI HEALTH OCCUPATIONS ❑ Z /rac APPRENTICESHIP CENTER a ❑\\El . i W ❑ Ele rr )FRf;vii1 — ❑ P-I P f'� i N DRIVEWAY N. 4th ST ❑ - 4 o ,0 ❑ . ____� E ❑ 1 1 ❑ i ❑ \ CI CI \ a o ❑ Z7. 0 \ E71 \ �D ; D t •a I I ❑ < _ ❑ 0 ❑ 3 ED O . 2 IL ❑ w :❑ ❑ '\ El El -= I I N. 3rd ST t SINGLE FAMILY HOUSES o ❑ 01 J 0!III� ❑ D ! Crl /l of El El ❑ ❑ - ❑ n i ❑ CD a _ - ❑ ❑ ❑ I ❑ o ❑ _ ❑ lib- o 0 ❑ 1--- ❑ . D ❑ a I ❑ ❑ D ❑ I I ID I = r ❑ D I I . M. 2nd ST. I .I I 'I 'I I 'C�l=. -CITY OF RENTON ,� eu ) :,:4�� - s- P ti- - , a�, ,_ �-s± �" w mic 3 ��• ,department ofP.lanningJBuilding/Public Works , 200 Mill Avenue South -Renton, Washington 98055 •°minute__ / / PLANNING DIVISION John W. obson I CITY OF RENTON 404 Pa Ave. N. Aue 0 8 1990 Rento Wa 98055 J E ��4 !MOT DELIVErAOLE,-==-��---- AS ADDRESSED (j _ ci) C66i 0UNABLE TO FOP4VARD �''� T 1 JiiJ '� l.._) Li cL Wci RETURN TO WRITER .�—e y (itiititti:iittttititt(tit:t:Iltltl,filillili:iiliiltittitidulttttin I 1 NOTICE OF PENDING SITE PLAN APPROVAL 1 RENTON, WASHINGTON A Site Plan Application has been filed and accepted with the Developmnet Services Division of the City of Renton. The following briefly describes the application and the necessary Public Approvals. I DESCRIPTION: Sartori-New Parking ECF;SA-070-90 The applicant proposes to convert a grassed play field of the former elementary school into a paved and landscaped 76 car parking lot. I GENERAL LOCATION: 315 Garden Avenue North I PUBLIC APPROVALS: Environmental Review i i Site Plan Approval 1 i The application can be reviewed in the Development Services Division located on the third floor of Renton City Hall. Comments will be accepted anytime prior to Public Hearings, during Public Hearings, or prior to an administrative site plan approval. For further information on the application or dates of final action by the City, please contact the Development Services Division, at 235-2550. N. 5th ST GRAPHIC SCALE . J ri I 1" = 200' �` I ❑ I 1 y win. I I I I 1 CI0 0' I 100' 200' 300' ❑ § Ti I _ O SARTORI HEALTH'OCCUPATIONS ❑ k APPRENTICESHIP CENTER a ❑ 61 F ■ _ o .�� / 1' U I Ct • l ❑ o ;ITV iir Rt v rC f' —❑ — Ct L i'r tI V E j DRIVEWAY_ N. 4th ST. ❑ L 0 , __ -CD I ] 0 ° Cl CI ILK. lid - o ' 0 ❑ P-I i _O - ❑ i i a 0 ❑ LeASE O ❑ 3 - 0 " I-1 • 4 :.! 1 0 , ❑ W ;❑ O \ p . n . I, I, III(1 �� I N. 3rd ST. SINGLE FAMILY HOUSES 3 D 0 Q—I ini r- n I -t' 0 ❑ CI ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑I — n ❑ a ❑ ❑ ° jai — ❑ I ❑ ❑ CI © 0 (] a ❑ ❑ -- ❑ ❑ I ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Ll ❑ El - ❑ CI E. ❑ I N. 2nd ST. 1 •I I I 1 1 . CITY OF RENTON I '''�E v '- `=2 Department of Planning/Building/Public Works N _ 3 AUG `_ ��_ .� 200 Mill Avenue South -Renton, Washington 98055 /o9fl �''fetemi, �° P���lIOF RENTONN r..' /7-- C1 Mary. Tobac . AUG $ `I990 324' Garde Ave. No Renton, ao 98055 lv�z'R.C� I • ?NOT DELIVERADLE NOT C -LWVrif - LE� AS ADDRESSED Cam! Cco ` UNABLE TO FORWARD L D(17 n 1 AS ADDRI.__n.ED 4. 61 Li !UNABLE TO FORWA I RETURN TO WRITER ��,v iititt�tt I lilt . . "if" n T 3�„ RETURN .O WRIT • NOTICE OF PENDING SITE PLAN APPROVAL RENTON, WASHINGTON A Site Plan Application has been filed and accepted with the Developmnet Services Division of the City of Renton. The following briefly describes the application and the necessary Public Approvals. DESCRIPTION: Sartori-New Parking ECF;SA-070-90 The applicant proposes to convert a grassed play field of the former elementary school into a paved and landscaped 76 car parking lot. _ GENERAL LOCATION: 315 Garden Avenue North PUBLIC APPROVALS: Environmental Review Site Plan Approval The application can be reviewed in the Development Services Division located on the third floor of Renton City Hall. Comments will be accepted anytime prior to Public Hearings, during Public Hearings, or prior to an administrative site plan approval. For further information on the application or dates of final action by the City, please contact the Development Services Division, at 235-2550. N. 5th ST. GRAPHIC SCALE \ r-Th i" = 200' a ° I I �o wili i i , , 1 ❑ I o 4 0 100' 200 300' _ _ - _ sARTowHEALTHOCCUPATIONS \\Elk.: (;APPRENi10ESHIP CENTER ❑ 3:1 fj :ITY iF PFNf(I F. � r F 0 P-I 0 6�i�Ct �:D DRIVEWAY N. 4th ST. ❑ : ❑ ❑ O . CI . a ElP-1 Z � ❑ ❑ Z i -- ;a r- . • aEl ! ❑ �� s8 l a -) % - E a a . = < ( ,1 a l] p o - _ _o ❑ El El ,, I, ,I It v l I N. 3rd ST. SINGLE FAMILY HOUSES a D . ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ a 0 o ❑ ❑ o a C3 D ❑ I ❑ b ❑ 0 ❑ I I 0, �❑o ❑ . a ❑ a 0 D a D 0 0 ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ . ❑ D ° ' o 0 • 1 0 11 a 0 a -E' N. 2r,d ST. f 11 I 1 CITY OF RENTON P --r\ r--� 7epartment of Planning/Building/Public Works a)3 AUG 200 Mill Avenue South -Renton, Washington 98055 \ -°..> #` "`PLANNINO DIVISIC CITY OF RENTON YO5"D"` ' -- AUG - 9 1990 RECEIVED W.R. Smith 359 Meadow Ave. N. Renton, Wa. 98055 SMIT:S'3 46055.302A 1489 O t/0°7/90 FORWARDING' TIME EXPIRED SMITH F D I&�##k 188 REN'>TJN JA 9A057 RETURN TO SENDER CITY OF RENTON v' v `� PM <'" ' department of Planning/Building/Public Works PLANNING DIVIS a's" CITY OF RFNTO 3 AUG ary -;5 200 Mill Avenue South -Renton, Washington 9 055 /95� AUG 1 3 1990 RECEIVED Richar G. Friedli 314 Ga den ve. N. Rento , Wa. 98055 F RIF314 411051028 o2 iN Y. 4WO `? % _ NO FORWARD ORDER UN FILE UNABLE TO FORWARD ADDRESSEE _ _ RETURN TO SENDER = UNKNOWN �.�-- c, II 511V ri RETURN TO SENDER �` -1i 3dyy NOTICE OF PENDING SITE PLAN APPROVAL . RENTON, WASHINGTON 1 A Site Plan Application has been filed and accepted with the Developmnet Services Division of the City of Renton. The following briefly describes the application and the necessary Public Approvals. DESCRIPTION: Sartori-New Parking ECF;SA-070-90 The applicant proposes to convert a grassed play field of the former elementary . school into a paved and landscaped 76 car parking lot. GENERAL LOCATION: 315 Garden Avenue North PUBLIC APPROVALS: Environmental Review I Site Plan Approval I The application can be reviewed in the Development Services Division located on the third floor of Renton City Hall. Comments will be accepted anytime prior to Public Hearings, during Public Hearings, or prior to an administrative site plan approval. For further information on the application or dates of final action by the City, please contact the Development Services Division, at 235-2550. • N. sn, ST. GRAPHIC SCALE J ri n co o o tr4 0' 100' I 200' 300' ET ❑ SARTORI ❑ HEALTH OCCUPATIONS ric APPRENTICESHIP APPREN TICESHIP CENTER — *. Ei . --) / --_.4.,;..,,.,,„ ,,.,N CITY )F RENT(f i. — DRIVEWAY- N. 4th ST. ❑ ❑ . Y ❑ — Q - L . rnra-• O ❑❑ J Ii O 0O P-I , z : O ❑ Z! Z Z O ❑ Z = E � n Y = ❑ ,..., BASE -tea o ' > ; ❑ _o ❑ O 8 wAil ❑ K =o ❑ El ❑ O Cl,I ,t ❑ 0 � -t- 1 1 1 o on N. 3rd ST. SINGLE FAMILY HOUSES �{ O 0 D 0 i]t ❑ 1 'I' ° ❑ /l l ❑ c-`-- ❑ ❑ ❑ D D O ❑ ID — CD ❑ CD ❑ n ❑ O ❑ a ❑ ❑ ❑ i ❑ b O D ❑ 17 Ono — ❑ ❑ ❑ a 0 ❑ 0 D ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ D . ❑ ❑ o I i ❑ ❑ ❑ . D ❑ i ❑ D N. 2nd ST. 1 .' I - I I I i . v CITY OF RENTON department of Planning/Building/Public Works �'' 1 F : - : , " -'' 25 3 AUG Yos 200 Mill Avenue South -Renton, Washington 98055 ' ^ gg� A G DIVISION -...,_ __, CITY OF RENTON AUG 1 3 1990 RECEIVED Robert L. & Arvilla F. Gordon 318 Garden Ave. N• 98055 gal lR 033.g 9,5055102a IN OA/07/010 Renton, Wa. . RETURN To SENDER NO FORWARD ORDER ON FILE UNABLE fC FORWARD ! ADDRESSEE �-a.. RETURN TO SENDER CHI o RETUrN TO SENDER 6. siNti NOTICE OF PENDING SITE PLAN APPROVAL RENTON, WASHINGTON A Site Plan Application has been filed and accepted with the Developmnet Services Division of the City of Renton. The following briefly describes the application and the necessary Public Approvals. DESCRIPTION: Sartori-New Parking , ECF;SA-070-90 The applicant proposes to convert a grassed play field of the former elementary school into a paved and landscaped 76 car parking lot. GENERAL LOCATION: 315 Garden Avenue North PUBLIC APPROVALS: Environmental Review Site Plan Approval The application can be reviewed in the Development Services Division located on the third floor of Renton City Hall. Comments will be accepted anytime prior to Public Hearings, during Public Hearings, or prior to an administrative site plan approval. For further information on the application or dates of final action by ' the City, please contact the Development Services Division, at 235-2550. N. 5th ST. GRAPHIC SCALE J _ 1" = 200' ❑ ❑ I I co1 Q IIPJI I I J I I '\: \NN.s ❑ a 0 100 200 300' D ❑ 1gil1 — a y SARTORI e HEALTH OCCUPATIONS ❑ Z �&APPRENTICESHIP CENTER r w, I ■ — i \ao _ Ili .=. �rY '�PAW('r / _ �,� ) F X P I P E "v L DRIVEWAY N. 4th ST. , is ❑0 0 X . . 0 . i 1 I� ❑ - P-I /- z = = Li 0 Z ✓ •< l I ❑ < _❑ LBASE : ID ❑ t \ 4p o BID _ ❑ o ' 1o . ❑ p idIr ❑ ❑ � - ❑ 0 ❑ 0 � = oo ,, ,, II ,,,, N. 3rd ST. SINGLE FAMILY HOUSES 3 n ❑ t- ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ El ❑ ❑ - 0 ❑ o ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 o ❑ ❑ I I ❑ - d ❑ 0 ❑ — O a ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ I I ❑ / ❑ ❑ 1C ❑ 0 HI . N. 2nd ST. / I .I I I I " I • • AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION 51067 Katihi,i uu .Joov;_i- ,being first duly sworn on oath states that he/she is the Chief Clerk of the VALLEY DAILY NEWS • Kent Edition • Renton Edition • Auburn Edition ENVIRONMENTAL DE '' i, ENVIRONMENTAL,REVITERMINATION W COMMITTEE'i' '•: ' r RENTON, WASHINGTON''''!.1',:” ' The.Environmental Review Committee 1 Daily newspapers published six (6) times a week. That said newspapers li (ERC) has issued a Determination of Non- are legal newspapers and are now and have been for more than six 4 Significance-Mitigated for the following pro : months prior to the date of publication referred toprinted and r Municipal under the,authority'i:1 the Renton: • published ,;, Municipal,Code.;�?�:�;`;,;..',�k`Hj'''t�I`, ",'; +; in the English language continually as daily newspapers in Kent, King 'i. „ RVTI "" ` '.':'r +l,';:,;;.k,.:,:,i1',•s:' Count Washington. The Valley Daily News has been approved as a legal ;''"' heap-089-90'''`' ?osc s;' tol i'., ?, :KE; !"a Y, g PP newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for ;';'''';The ent'ing os2o in iu and:�':$ P g "'ta` an existingP �� r King County. f�;,, parking act•to include an,?. '.;•, i;r; , additional24 spaces.,The roe Ig?:i!' P P,fi!' � located A l,.. i,; .at3000 NE''4th';StreeLt sis i.'1,6 'lift t SARTORI.=.NEW',AR IN , ;-# The notice in the exact form attached, was published in the Kent Edition i`'' EC SA•070 "i'It?'+' �"';4? r `ol` XX , Renton Edition Xz, ,;. `•: o co v: rt' ', i , Auburn Edition {a , (and not in ;;:, The applicant propose§td Convert a t i 11 supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers .i • grassed piny field of the former,.elegy., n during the below stated period. The annexed notice a P trhl i ,- "i o t 1 , , mentca ',school into-a paved'an-d•;'j^'., �'S 1s'..' landscaped,78,oerrpe�tcirtg�fotr 1'fi�t r`} property.Is.located-.ar.315-Gsrden:t; 1 (rz 7i G7TlPl iti'La . ll i " •.r,G ,. r +' a-'p I�� :,- lV.arininatlon 7 .'Ii ! 31 vi"4"9 F');y� t igilfi 'i.5,li q. 1,AT Avenue'N•orth':,.,Ii+ , ..,, ,i".,' r ."i :4 a,; was published on August r 199 0 "This decision will be finalized in fifteen (15)days.Written comments:received after',) !; 5:00 p.m.i August 21;1990 will not be con ,.'sidered. A fourteen (14) day appeal period`i The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the �• will commence following the fi ialization of'_§ sum of$ 2 _ ;;p r. DNS-M. The mitigation measures imposed 1 � by the City of Renton's Environmental r i. Review Committee are available at'the l'' Development Services, Division, Municipal �� Wati,1&4/) • Building, Rentoni;";Washingtonl'.98055.'„�A/ 3; Phone: 235-2550. ' '', '*•! 1 C Published In.the.Valley Daily News.on:,1. g'August 8 1990�AC 74u4420'.t'i'.11: ,i$p . l0:4'5108 r i t`' . / ,,e";•(1.ti./t.fit/ 4., Subscribed and sworn before me this ]./l i,h day of Au n u s t19 9 0 • No y'Public for the State of Washington residing at Auburn, King County, Washington VDN#87 Revised 4/89 PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF RENTON StP 1 3 1990 RECEWVEO NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a Determination of Non-Significance- Mitigated for the following project(s) under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code. RVTI ECF;SA-069-90 The applicant proposes to expand an existing parking lot to include an additional 24 spaces. The property is located at 3000 NE 4th Street. SARTORI - NEW PARKING ECF;SA-070-90 The applicant proposes to convert a grassed play field of the former elementary school into a paved and landscaped 76 car parking lot. The property is located at 315 Garden Avenue North. This decision will be finalized in fifteen (15) days. Written comments received after 5:00 p.m., August 21, 1990 will not be considered. A fourteen (14) day appeal period will commence following the finalization of DNS-M. The mitigation measures imposed by the City of Renton's Environmental Review Committee are available at the Development Services Division, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington 98055. Phone: 235-2550. Publication Date: August 6, 1990 Account No. 51067 . N oT ENVIRONMENTAL DECLARATION APPLICATION NO. ECF;SA 070 90 PROPOSED ACTION SARTORI - NEW PARKING RENTON SCHOOL DIST 403 THE APPLICANT PROPOSES TO CONVERT A GRASSED PLAYFIELD OF THE FORMER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL INTO A PAVED AND LANDSCAPED 76 CAR PARKING LOT. • GENERAL LOCATION AND OR ADDRESS 315 GARDEN AVENUE NORTH PDt-ADYL-.ac,01�. POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF F AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE CE.R.C.) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DDOES XDOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT DWILL XWILL NOT BE REQUIRED. THE CITY OF RENTON WILL NOT ACT ON THIS PROPOSAL FOR 15 DAYS FROM THE DATE BELOW. COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY AUGUST 21, 1990 AN APPEAL OF THE ABOVE DETERMINATION MAY BE FILED WITH THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER BY 5:00 P.M., • FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON PLANNING DIVISION AT 235-2550. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION } CERTIFICATION I , 44144.;, 0 , ' HEREBY CERTIFY THAT 3 COPIES OF THE ABOVE DOCUMEN WERE POSTED BY ME IN 3 CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON OR NEARBY THE DESCRIBED PROPERTY ON , ?/.3— ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a �E.TJ,p •j� Notary Publ' in and for the State of 4lashingt n A gyp.49 •••'• ! residin in s') p��•/��� /J� / /�//�� , on the / g .��5T 1 o iG'L"�3'"�cr• +9Z/G day of �% 6 : •V N�TA' • �. • : - G • •: PUBLIC • ,,moo D.%.:VI.9 A •• (?A.047 NOT ICE ENvIRONMENTAL DECLARATION • APPLICATION NO. ECF;SA-070-90 PROPOSED ACTION SARTORI - NEW PARKING RENTON SCHOOL DIST 403 THE APPLICANT PROPOSES TO CONVERT A GRASSED PLAYFIELD OF THE FORMER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL INTO A PAVED AND LANDSCAPED 76 CAR PARKING LOT. GENERAL LOCATION AND OR ADDRESS 315 GARDEN AVENUE NORTH POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE [ E.R.C. ) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION ❑DOES XDOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT DWILL XWILL NOT BE REQUIRED. THE CITY OF RENTON WILL NOT ACT ON THIS PROPOSAL FOR 15 DAYS FROM THE DATE BELOW. COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY AUGUST 21 , 1990 AN APPEAL OF THE ABOVE DETERMINATION MAY BE FILED WITH THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER BY 5:00 P.M., • FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON PLANNING DIVISION AT 235-2550. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION ................. ....:..: >;>;�>:.;;::::;:>::.�:..�::.�.:...:.�:.::.>;:.;::.::,.�:::..::::��.............. �� - ,�>.,. �»>:;..,. :::,:.... :.TON.:::... ;:;::;::.::::::�;:�>:�::>>< ]:::::::;::;>;:�:<;. :::::<>:�:.>:;;::; ;. > :CiJRRE . :::i::;:;i:::::>:?i{iG:: :� ?:�i% >ii;:�:�:�:�>;:Y•:;....._ . . NT :p. � ;>:.�. :� .,�; :. :. t; ;;:;:�;> ;; ,: ::::.�: ::.�: �; : : ..... L7�NN,I :...,DI V;�,S:ION:.; ;;;;;:�:�::.;:.:.:.;.:. .:..:.;:�:. <.:.:.;:.:.>:.;:..::.;:.;; FIDAT'h:::0p;..SERVICt.::. . .,.:, :.:, .,: ;.::;..,::: On the 3la day of uS* 19_91D , I deposited in the mails of the United States a sealed envelope containing ..=). -}eym, crvlS Cl.e_.c.1(.1,s-6 documents . This infoimation was .sent to: Name Representing i ).O. E o r--QL_ Velty-k,%Ir\ - t•z\-, Alq _ fi. o-F' u),l of - 1O•J -�- -�5�, cs °�rnc s l,c��z �iruhsp n« „z. �-e awe. Ucr- r-Zi.4. , D.L.k.v3arr,,sh^Tv, • (Signature of Sender) Saw-v=6x_ ct. • Sub cribed ;A1p1iw tn . to me this day of 19 0 �o c1/4Gp,RETJ ° lypTq So•T . • �' Not t �,- Publ ' in and for the ▪ t. P�BCic St f W hington residing .:;F,;%: . s, 1e�h.• 2.•• at '# 0�W....A .6c°sis therein . Project Na..n.rle : + Pro ct .• Numbcr_C CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST NO.: ECF-070-90 APPLICATION NO(S): SA-070-90 PROPONENT: Renton School Dist. #403 PROJECT NAME: Sartori-New Parking DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant proposes to convert a grassed play field of the former elementary school into a paved and landscaped 76 car parking lot. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 315 Garden Avenue North LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Development Planning Section The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). Conditions were imposed as mitigation measures by the Environmental Review Committee under their authority of Section 4-2822(D) Renton Municipal Code (see attached sheet). These conditions are necessary to mitigate environmental impacts identified during the environmental review process. This Determination of Non-Significance -Mitigated (DNS-M) is issued under WAC 197-11-340(2). Because mitigation measures have been imposed,the lead agency will not act on this proposal for fifteen (15) days from August 6, 1990. Any interested party may submit written comments which must be submitted by 5:00 p.m., August 21, 1990, in order to be considered. A fourteen (14) day appeal period will commence following the finalization of the DNS-M. Responsible Official: Environmental Review Committee c/o Don Erickson,Zoning Administrator Development Services Division Department of Planning/Building/Public Works 200 Mill Avenue South Renton,WA 98055 PUBLICATION DATE: August 6, 1990 DATE OF DECISION: August 1, 1990 SIGNATURES: Lynn A. Gu n, dministrator Department f Tanning/Building/Public Works Jay Co {• n, Exe ti 'Assistant to the Ma a • - r DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED MITIGATION MEASURES PROJECT: Sartori-New Parking PROPONENT: Renton School Dist. #403 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST: ECF-070-90 APPLICATION NUMBER: SA-070-90 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant proposes to convert a grassed play field of the former elementary school into a paved and landscaped 76 car parking lot. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 315 Garden Avenue North RECOMMENDATIONS: The Environmental Review Committee issued a Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated with the following conditions: 1. The applicant shall provide a revised landscaping plan indicating: a)the species, size and location of plant materials to be used around the boundary and within the parking lots; b) an earthen berm along Garden Ave. N. to further buffer the residential area; and c) replacing the paving strip with landscaping along the west boundary of the existing parking lot. 2. The applicant shall provide an erosion control plan, subject to approval iby the Public Works Division,which includes restrictions of hauling routes and hours of hauling operations to between 8 A.M. and 3:30 P.M.and a plan to water down the site periodically to control dust and debris. 3. The applicant shall provide hard court recreation facilities within the existing and proposed parking area for patron and neighborhood use. mmdoc-1 OF RENTON "LL I , Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Earl Clymer, Mayor Lynn Guttmann, Administrator August 3, 1990 Washington State Department of Ecology Environmental Review Section Mail Stop PV-11 Olympia, WA 98504 SUBJECT: Environmental Determinations Transmitted herewith are copies of Environmental Determinations and Environmental Checklists for those projects reviewed by the Environmental Review Committee on August 1, 1990: DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED RVTI ECF;SA-069-90 The applicant proposes to expand an existing parking lot to include an additional 24 spaces. The project is located at 3000 NE 4th Street. SARTORI - NEW PARKING ECF;SA-070-90 The applicant proposes to convert a grassed play field of the former elementary school into a paved and landscaped 76 car parking lot. The property is at 315 Garden Avenue North. The 15 day comment period for these projects will end on August 21, 1990. Following the end of the comment period, the City will finalize its Determination unless comments received require a reevaluation. Following the finalization of the Determination, there is a required 14 day appeal period. If you have questions, please call Mark Pywell or me at 235-2550. For the Environmental Review Committee, Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator cc: Mr. Craig Larson, King County Planning Division Mr. Gregory M. Bush, Metro Department of Wildlife Mr. Joe Robels, Department of Fisheries Mr. James Lutz, Department of Transportation Ms. Connie Corpuz, City of Seattle Duwamish Tribal Office Muckleshoot Tribal Office agncyltr/DKE/kac 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2631 %0 CITY )F RENTON • Department of Planning/Building/Public Works. Earl Clymer, Mayor Lynn Guttmann, Administrator August 3, 1990 • Mike Yuhl 12929 Northup Way, #300 Bellevue, WA 98005 SUBJECT: Sartori - New Parking ECF;SA-070-90 Dear Mr.Yuhl: This letter is written on behalf of the Environmental Review Committee and is to inform you that they have completed their review of the environmental impacts of the above-referenced project. The Committee, on August 1, 1990, decided that your project may be issued a Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated with the following conditions: 1. The applicant shall provide a revised landscaping plan indicating: a) the species, size and location of plant materials to be used around the boundary and within the parking lots; b) an earthen berm along Garden Ave. N. to further buffer the residential area; and c) replacing the paving strip with landscaping along the west boundary of the existing parking lot. 2. The applicant shall provide an erosion control plan, subject to approval by the Public Works Division,which includes restrictions of hauling routes and hours of hauling operations to between 8 A.M. and 3:30 P.M. and a plan to water down the site periodically to control dust and debris. 3. The applicant shall provide hard court recreation facilities within the existing and proposed parking area for patron and neighborhood use. Because the Environmental Review Committee imposed specific mitigation measures rather than issue a Determination of Significance, there is a required 15 day comment period during which comments are solicited from various agencies, jurisdictions or individuals (including the applicant) who may have an interest in the Committee's decision. The comment period will end August 21, 1990. Following the end of the comment period, the City will finalize its Determination unless comments received require a reevaluation. Following the finalization of the Determination, there is a required 14 day appeal period. Staff urges you to contact the various City representatives, as appropriate, (e.g., the Department of Planning/Building/Public Works) as soon as possible, to obtain more information concerning specific mitigation elements recommended for this project, if you have specific questions. This information will assist you in planning for implementation of your project and will enable you to exercise your appeal rights more fully, if you choose to do so. ercdecsn/DKE/kac inn Mill Avenue South - Renton. Washington 98055 - (2061 235-2631 Mike Yuhl Sartori -New Parking August 3, 1990 • Page 2 In addition, by the end of the comment period, we should be able to establish a tentative public hearing date before the Hearing Examiner, should a public hearing be necessary. If you have any questions or desire clarification of the above, please call Mark Pywell or me at 235-2550. o Environmental R ' w ' e Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator cc: Renton School Dist. #403 435 Main Ave S Renton, WA 98055 ercdecsn/DKE/kac City of Renton:: Environmental Review:Committee MEETING NOTICE August 1, 1990 To: Lynn Guttmann, Public Works Director Jay Covington, Mayor's Administrative Assistant Ron Nelson, Building Official im Hanson, Development Services Manager Glen Gordon, Fire Marshall From: Don Erickson, Secretary (0( Meeting Date: August 1, 1990` Time: 10:00 AM Location: Third Floor Conference Room Agenda attached below. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA AUGUST 1, 1990 Third Floor Conference Room Commencing at 10:00 AM TIME/KEY PARTICIPANTS NEW RENTON SCHOOL DIST. 403, RVTI ECF;SA-069-90 The applicant proposes to expand an existing parking lot to include an additional 24 spaces. RENTON SCHOOL DIST. 403, SARTORI ECF;SA-070-90 The applicant proposes to convert a grassed playfield of the former elementary school into a paved and landscaped 76 car parking lot. DISCUSSION SUN POINTE PUD-ADMIN DETERMINATION ....::::::: :: ::.::::::::.:: :. • :i MM NlTY:.:.D.E V:t40 PI V•:::IE•:<,N: T.<';>P ge/::. .R7.:.: • • I111'ENT' ':« '>.: ><::„.. < ;> :;:: > EV . L IEW N /ITTEE < >NONMENTA EV : : >: . O us 9.90 .......................... :::.'1 ;:i:::1 6:.:::: >::�:>: ::::: :: ::::: > > ::;enton Sc:::: i t c`: > :: :: € :> z::: :::: >:: ::::::>: :><:::P ICANT <: >;:::::::::::.....................::::.;;:::.;:::: >:.:;•::::.:.>�entnn.:School.:p i$trlot.:..:::•:.:::.:>:;:.::.;:.:>::;.:;;:.;:.::.:::::::::::._::::::::: F''::":::::.::: :'>: ::::> �: : i iii :::> ::::s :: Sartor :Ne...:Prk n >< <` > < < < z . >> ` ::: :: >::: ROJECT:::•:::.;:•::<•::::':::•; . »>:.:::::;:::.:i:•::Sartori Ney✓.Parkin.9.;.> UIRC NMeNTAL.. H� . ........... .. . ..... ....... ........ :0::::. ..:....:..: .. ::><: :;.: ........................ ........ ....... ... . CKLI ST.........:........ECI=;:SA-070=90 : � ::>:: : :< :<:: <<:> <::::: : :�> <::::`< ::::: : :: :::::` DE`::::::'I IPTI•: :N ... PR . .<::SAL ; : lica:t : : to cov : > >r> ; �:� . e d SC 0 O R01'OSAL The applicant.proposes to_con ert �.:g.,assed:p:ay.,.., :.. v ` n����.�I:��:iit ... .. a ecl a d> ���f.th ...f`rm �I m of����; � Iioo o a o e o e ee a sc : .::1g.;:..:c:..::.6 :7: •::.:ar;,_.. :rkin,.:lot :::>: : ::> :.. :<>:> >:: ::::: :' ;_ antlsca etl 6 ca a o . .... . ....... .. . ...... : > 15 G:. rd?nA VOhu ee Nord :: ::::: :::::::::>::::: :>: ::::::::;:..LOCATIONst QF:�PROPO AL: . > :::::::::: 3.„ , . .: „ , *:- „::. ::::::: :::::::::::: : : :.:.:, `: Light? >: -•••:••:;: : : <; „:::::::<:::; :'<: s":< ':: ;:. ;; <;:::::>:::<::>:;:;:;:;: :> ::;:;:::.:.:.:",:. `rr`:r t`:•Tr ff.i :No e SSU�S .. . ... . Aesthetic ........................... : s NatUra( Environ e a..c ..... s. ,..... :.iar.:::and P lic:Ser�ices :> rid G nd ub Se c s: >><:>:: ::>: : : :::::>:::::<::>::> : e m nat on<:::FtE��:��>��fVIMFNDAT` �N Y<»>:>::<>::� �:: >:<::::>>����:�.��::::>:::�:: >:::<:>:':>:': t; ; ���:�`:ER .. ���� a e e a .......... C..O.. ..................10...5... :::::...........,..... • St fiF..recommend...fiat..the....... ..slue .. ............. .:...::...::::: f:oowiingg` :::::rMiti:�>::>t:>:: wt e o 0�:�� fN n=� �����rificarce a ed: o o S ...:.........:.:..::...:...•........................................:.............::.....:. cod ossee: ae • J 0' 100' 200' 300' \\\:-------4 sill 0 ❑ I I o> oW ❑ _" SARTORI • • HEALTH OCCUPATIONS l O f� I z & APPRENTICESHIP U N I tR z 1 3' / .. • 11 i - -= / E. IF( �`v �v P-I C ' DRIVEWAY • _ N. 4th ST. f 1 itil • - I' 1 hi r_n� :�r--, n ❑ El • • n _ P-I i •_ I I n z . 2 z z I I z I I ¢ — _ I I BASE I ❑ )- ❑ ❑ �BO -) Z o 3. , • J —I . . .. I .1 • o = r i 0 ❑ ( 1 ❑ • = U ❑ N. 3sd ST. SINGLE FAMILY HOUSES II _ II ( z �,, 1 ❑ lJ L 7 ❑ ❑ ❑ • n . ❑ ❑. 1 1 1--1I ❑ - F-1 I 1- �n 1 , Environmental Review Comr i ee Staff Report Sartori- New Parking August 1, 1990 Page 2 1. The applicant shall provide a revised landscaping plan indicating: a) the species, size and location of plant materials to be used around the boundary and within the parking lots; b) an earthen berm along Garden Ave. N. to further buffer the residential area; and c) replacing the paving strip with landscaping along the west boundary of the existing parking lot. 2. • The applicant shall provide an erosion control plan, subject to approval by the Public Works Division,which includes restrictions of hauling routes and hours of hauling operations to between 8 A.M. and 3:30 P.M. and a plan to water down the site periodically to control dust and debris. The proposed development consist of converting a grassed play field to a paved and landscaped 76 parking stall parking lot adjacent to the existing parking lot. Due to the adjacent residential areas the applicant will be required to provide a landscaped buffer around the perimeter of the parking area. The play field is a neighborhood amenity that will be lost to provide the necessary parking. In order to compensate the neighborhood, to the extent possible for the loss of the play field, the Parks and Recreation Department recommended that hard court sports areas (e.g., basketball hoops, four square, etc.) could be provided. There is an existing fence running along N. 4th Street that past surveys have indicated might be located within the public right-of-way. The applicant will have to field verify the fence location and relocate it if necessary. The existing parking area does not have a landscaped boundary or any interior landscaping. The applicant will be required to provide landscaping within this area. 1. Aesthetics/Land Use Impacts: The proposed development consist of adding seventy-six parking stalls to an existing parking lot at the Sartori School. This school building was converted from an elementary school to part of the Renton Vocational Technical Institute. The change in the student body has necessitated the increase in the size of the parking area. Currently, there are fifty-four parking spaces in the existing parking area. This area will be striped to provide 80 parking stalls. The parking area will then provide a total of 156 parking stalls for students, faculty and staff. The plans submitted indicate a 13-foot wide landscape strip along N. 4th Street and a 20-foot wide landscape strip along Garden Ave. N., which the applicant proposes to landscape with turf, a Wax- leaf Privet hedge and three Deodara Cedars. Due to the fact that this area fronts onto a residential area, staff is requiring the applicant to provide an enhanced landscape plan to provide a strong visual buffer to the residential area. The enhanced landscape plan shall include a variety of shrubs to provide color, an earthen berm along Garden Avenue N. and shade trees along both street boundaries and within the interior planters. Along the west boundary of the existing parking area, there is a ten-foot asphalt strip between the parking area and a chain-link fence. This asphalt strip should be removed and replaced with a landscape strip. Mitigation Measures: The applicant shall submit an enhanced landscaping plan, subject to approval of the Planning Division, which includes the following: a) additional plant materials along both N. 4th Street and Garden Ave. N.; b) an earthen berm along Garden Ave. N.; c) addition of trees in the interior plants; and d) the replacement of the asphalt strip adjacent to the existing parking area with a landscape strip. Policy Nexus: Parking and Loading Ordinance 4-14, Landscape Requirements 4-32-34 and Comprehensive Plan Section III.C. • . Environmental Review Committee Staff Report Sartori-New Parking August 1, 1990 Page 3 2. Natural Environment Impacts: The portion of the project site that is now proposed for development was leveled and used as a turfed play field for the elementary school. Only a minor amount of grading will be required to prepare the base of the new parking area. The project is located within Zone 1 of the Aquifer Protection Area. The applicant will need to provide baffles in the oil/water separators in order to ensure protection of the water quality. Mitigation Measures: Baffles will need to be provide in the proposed oil/water separators. Policy Nexus: Environmental Review Ordinance 4-6 3. Traffic Impacts: Construction activities, including grading and paving of the proposed parking area, could generate traffic which would impact area roadways during the peak traffic hours. Based on the fact that N. 4th Street is designated as a Major Arterial, measures will be required (e.g., limited hauling hours) to mitigate traffic impacts from hauling activities on area roadways. A previous roadway project in this area indicated that the existing fence along N. 4th Street was located 1-1/2 to 2 feet into the public right-of-way. The applicant will be required to provide a site plan with the property line correctly located and to relocate the fence out of the public right-of-way. Mitigation Measures: Construction traffic to and from the project site shall be limited to the hours between 8 A.M. and 3:30 P.M. Policy Nexus: Environmental Review Ordinance 4-6 4. Noise, Light and Glare Impacts: Noise, light and glare are anticipated in conjunction with the grading and paving of the parking area. • Some mitigation of these impacts will be achieved through the recommended limitations hauling hours and construction activities. During the operation of the parking area, glare could be produced from the required security lighting. This impact would be mitigated, to the extent possible, by the additional landscaping recommended by staff. Mitigation Measures: 1) See Traffic Mitigation. 2) Provide additional landscaping around and within the proposed parking lot. Policy Nexus: Landscaping Requirements 4-31-34, Comprehensive Plan Section III.C. 5. Public Services a) Recreation • Impact: The Parks and Recreation Department recommends that the proponent consider some type of on-site recreation amenities, such as outdoor hard surface courts and picnic tables,to be used by their patrons. Mitigation Measures: None required. Policy Nexus: Environmental Review Ordinance 4-6 b) Storm Water Impacts: The paving of the parking lot will decrease the amount of permeable area on the project site and could increase the amount of storm run-off from the site. Mitigation Measures: The applicant shall provide the following materials subject to the Public Works Division approval: a) drainage plans for this project complying with the core and special requirements contained in Section 1.2 and 1.3 of Chapter 1, the hydrologic analysis methods contained in Chapter 3, the hydraulic analysis and design methods Environmental Review Comrr..1: e Staff Report Sartori- New Parking August 1, 1990 Page 4 contained in Chapter 4, and the erosion/sedimentation control plan and practices contained in Chapter 5 of the 1990 King County Surface Water Design Manual; b) install control/flow restrictor manhole; and c) baffles for the oil/water separators. Policy Nexus: Environmental Review Ordinance 4-6 � E� ><>> :C0:11liNlEIVTS �:���t�:V:I�1N`IN+GbEPART S ..................................................... ... • • • • • RENTONL )MMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DE, ATMENT • ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: `...en t. DATE CIRCULATED: July 2, 1990 (�� COMMENTS DUE: July 18, 1990 EFC-070-90 APPLICATION NO(S): SA-070-90 PROPONENT: Renton School District#403 PROJECT TITLE: SATORI SCHOOL BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: This project involves converting a grassed playfield of a former elementary school into a paved and landscaped 76 car parking lot to serve the increased parking needs caused by the school's present use as a vocational training school. LOCATION: 315 Garden Avenue North SITE AREA: 3.2 acres BUILDING AREA (gross): 33,640 sq. ft. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS: PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth 2. Air 3. Water 4. Plants 5. Animals 6. Energy& Natural Resources 7. Environmental Health 8. Land &Shoreline Use 9. Housing 10. Aesthetics 11. Light & Glare 12. Recreation 13. Historic & Cultural Preservation 14. Transportation 15. Public Services 16. Utilities COMMENTS: 5 ZO1-214se PrS LAG As 5 ,LA ,-9A-C. Asub Lea SCM''n1/45C., -ov t - We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. ;gip,, /760'D Sinnatl ire o.Director or Authorized Representative Date RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET PLANNING DiVN'tON crr!OFRREN1""' ECF-070-90 APPLICATION NO(S).: SA-070-90 JUL - 3 is en PROPONENT: Renton School District#403 ~'i E ,,; I ` �, PROJECT TITLE: SATORI SCHOOL BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: This project involves converting a grassed playfield of a former elementary school into a paved and landscaped 76 car parking lot to serve the increased parking needs caused by the schools present use as a vocational training school. LOCATION: 315 Garden Avenue North TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION CURRENT PLANNING LONG RANGE PLANNING PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P.M. ON July 18, 1990. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: L�•364c APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED co►� LI-9/ C-9 .M ASS -os sp R roz_ tnk, Lem vr-t, 5z-4,49ot- L1A0-5A5 r��r ()-2u_1— � � � ' LlLE�r' 0- I-oss Or ee+) sr .ea_ G�crc�p S rUgLAc 1 • )ATE: 7(i 7o SIGNAT 'R OF DIRE TOR 'On AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE gtiaWal* ,1Ut 0 9 1990 RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF RENT ON DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET PUBLI�R�R DES cost-OM ECF-070-90 APPLICATION NO(S).: SA-070-90 PROPONENT: Renton School District#403 PROJECT TITLE: SATORI SCHOOL BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: This project involves converting a grassed playfield of a former elementary school into a paved and landscaped 76 car parking lot to serve the increased parking needs caused by the schools present use as a vocational training school. LOCATION: 315 Garden Avenue North TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT' COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION CURRENT PLANNING LONG RANGE PLANNING PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: jcfa✓t-e/l� COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P.M. ON July 18, 1990. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: LQ- V APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS KNOT APPROVED JUL ;1 8 199 • 1 P 7-/� - lb DATE: •- SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AU HORIZED REPRESENTATIVE RENTON'LJMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEFT._ TMENT • ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: "( DATE CIRCULATED: July 2, 1990 COMMENTS DUE: July 18, 1990 EFC-070-90 APPLICATION NO(S): SA-070-90 PROPONENT: Renton School District#403 PROJECT TITLE: SATORI SCHOOL BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT; This project involves converting a.grassed playfield of a former elementary school into a paved and landscaped 76 car parking lot to serve the increased parking needs caused by the school's present use as a vocational training school. LOCATION: 315 Garden Avenue North SITE AREA: 3.2 acres BUILDING AREA (gross): 33,640 sq.ft. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS: PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth 2. Air 3. Waterr 4. Plants 5. Animals 6. Energy& Natural Resources , 7. Environmental Health 8. Land &Shoreline Use 9. Housing 10. Aesthetics 11. Light & Glare 12. Recreation 13. Historic& Cultural Preservation 14. Transportation 15. Public Services 16. Utilities COMMENTS: sirNSTne,C /q ®fa�T. aI% hitfQGTfi r A/®#o 19 ',AweFt6vQ 0 fct.. (/J• c, v, / . 02 firmmeti-6 is G/ ,ogojvee c4cc c',ti /149601 ttK SNo wK-/ 0 '' 69,,/lvv4/) L-15 gilCK C 0 LA" 0(5 ) d 6 'Y ,e 5' 4 s4P,''4-7 w, f_7-6e Fait c4c viv t 4 ri '' sySTIgi't15— ?a 54v4 oi'vGfw�`1 c/1 Ae6es, ( Ore/ v � cy- t76ii /s rvd� 4 LG �,D /^1 x� ti7 u(/� © s ' t4/T— 4 Li;Tarim IXTv/ S SPR Htp/)S Tp v s`2 av1 sAf,eU tc P6K v, C, Copis: We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. I 7-/7 - ?° �innati ira of flirentnr nr Authorized Renresentative Date RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF-070-90 APPLICATION NO(S).: SA-070-90 PROPONENT: Renton School District#403 PROJECT TITLE: SATORI SCHOOL BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: This project involves converting a grassed playfield of a former elementary school into a paved and landscaped 76 car parking lot to serve the increased parking needs caused by the schools present use as a vocational training school. LOCATION: 315 Garden Avenue North TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION CURRENT PLANNING LONG RANGE PLANNING PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P.M. ON July 18, 1990. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: ` d l`ce APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED r!.ANNANG Di\I S ON crrY OF RENTON JUL 1 8 1990 fritAiti DATE: (5-n° v SIGNATURE OF DIRECTO R AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE RENTON':.<.)MMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEk 1TMENT ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Po�tC 2. DATE CIRCULATED: July 2, 1990 COMMENTS DUE: July 18, 1990 EFC-070-90 APPLICATION NQ(S): SA-070-90 PROPONENT: Renton School District#403 PROJECT TITLE: SATORI SCHOOL BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: This project involves converting a grassed playfield of a former elementary school into a paved and landscaped 76 car parking lot to serve the increased parking needs caused by the school's present use as a vocational training school. LOCATION: 315 Garden Avenue North SITE AREA: 3.2 acres BUILDING AREA (gross): 33,640 sq. ft. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS: PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth, 2. Air 3. Water 4. Plants 5. Animals 6. Energy& Natural Resources 7. Environmental Health 8. Land & Shoreline Use 9. Housing 10. Aesthetics 11. Light & Glare 12. Recreation 13. Historic & Cultural Preservation 14. Transportation 15. Public Services 16. Utilities • COMMENTS: YIAn/ rtl We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. . gA-!M•Z Signature of Director or Authorize Representative Date RENTON , . )MMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DE dTMENT • ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: �1,aYr. DATE CIRCULATED: July 2, 1990 COMMENTS DUE: July 18, 1990 EFC-070-90 APPLICATION NO(S): SA-070-90 PROPONENT: Renton School District#403 PROJECT TITLE: SATORI SCHOOL BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: This project involves converting a grassed playfield of a former elementary school into a paved and landscaped 76 car parking lot to serve the increased parking needs caused by the school's present use as a vocational training school. LOCATION: 315 Garden Avenue North SITE AREA: 3.2 acres BUILDING AREA (gross): 33,640 sq. ft. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS: PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth 2. Air 3. Water 4. Plants 5. Animals 6. Energy& Natural Resources 7. Environmental Health 8. Land &Shoreline Use 9. Housing 10. Aesthetics 11. •Light & Glare 12. Recreation 13. Historic & Cultural Preservation 14. Transportation 15. Public Services 16. Utilities COMMENTS: ?'--e �,� ,� ) 1l Cam, )c9 - r 4,4-1 � = °," F a7 ( CC .d A 6 e 1 P- f� Gam'� L7 41 J °'- e..X �4y... / / -- e C e_ l / 1-7- LA cL j 1,1/'‹ to 7 F I- i?miT:�:4 ��/`�� . ��. S-f We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas-t which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. / l? -c� A. +h .ice 1 D .. .+ n r / laggE, XWIE JUL' O 3 1990 NTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Ci i •r bF RENT ON DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET PUBLIC WORKS CUSTOMER SERVICES ECF-070-90 APPLICATION NO(S).: SA-070-90 PROPONENT: Renton School District#403 PROJECT TITLE: SATORI SCHOOL BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: This project involves converting a grassed playfield of a former elementary school into a paved and landscaped 76 car parking lot to serve the increased parking needs caused by the schools present use as a vocational training school. LOCATION: 315 Garden Avenue North TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: ENGINEERING DIVISION x TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION CURRENT PLANNING <;ry c-;-a!~i•.rNo LONG RANGE PLANNING �. e Ui L. 8 1990 PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT I y.f L,✓ OTHERS: r COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P.M. ON July 18, 1990. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: 65--;) , APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS - NOT APPROVED gg a -ram�r o y S � �-v--o}���c .r.-�.n .i � �-r�� e�is r/k� 4 h - a? /442 /11,0.Zeif") hp I A.71— CO' t p l 7 Icw— 1>�! / / ATE: ////. •SIGNATUR•E OF DIRECTOR C, +UTHORILE REPRESENTATIV / � RENTON',_1')MMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DE RTMENT ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: DATE CIRCULATED: July 2, 1990 COMMENTS DUE: July 18, 1990 EFC-070-90 APPLICATION NO(S): SA-070-90 PROPONENT: Renton School District#403 PROJECT TITLE: SATORI SCHOOL BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: This project involves converting a grassed playfield of a former elementary school into a paved and landscaped 76 car parking lot to serve the increased parking needs caused by the school's present use as a vocational training school. LOCATION: 315 Garden Avenue North SITE AREA: 3.2 acres BUILDING AREA (gross): 33,640 sq. ft. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS: PROBABLE ' PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth 2. Air 3. Water 4. Plants 5. Animals 6. Energy& Natural Resources 7. Environmental Health 8. Land & Shoreline Use 9. Housing 10. Aesthetics 11. Light &Glare 12. Recreation 13. Historic & Cultural Preservation 14. Transportation 15. Public Services 16. Utilities COMMENTS: $ V5T6 \ , , 's / s z°^/ . I v '- 7-X -1' , We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. /4? / 7 9C) Cinnati iro of rlirantnr nr .i ithnri7ari Ronrocon ativa data re1"1)ENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT JUL 0 3 1990 DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET CITY OF RENT ON PUBLIC WORKS GUSTO FO .RV10ES 0-90 APPLICATION NO(S).: SA-070-90 ' I PROPONENT: Renton School District#403 PROJECT TITLE: SATORI SCHOOL BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: This project involves converting a grassed playfield of a former elementary school into a paved and landscaped 76 car parking lot to serve the increased parking needs caused by the schools present use as a vocational training school. LOCATION: 315 Garden Avenue North TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION CURRENT PLANNING LONG RANGE PLANNING PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: .5A '- & COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P.M. ON July 18, 1990. • REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: 5owW APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED r'tli li�if r;1 3Ni5ioN cm( p,EF•n_C>•,. JUL. 1 81990 • • • '—'\TE: 7- 17 - •SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR L..,-.UTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE A • RENTOL'. :. OMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIL,4RTMENT ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: oA—rn DATE CIRCULATED: July 2, 1990 c COMMENTS DUE: July 18, 1990 EFC-070-90 • APPLICATION NO(S): SA-070-90 PROPONENT: Renton School District#403 PROJECT TITLE: SATORI SCHOOL BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: This project involves converting a grassed playfield of a former elementary school into a paved and landscaped 76 car parking lot to serve the increased parking needs caused by the school's present use as a vocational training school. LOCATION: 315 Garden Avenue North SITE AREA: 3.2 acres BUILDING AREA (gross): 33,640 sq.ft. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS: PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth 2. Air 3. Water 4. Plants 5. Animals 6. Energy& Natural Resources 7. Environmental Health 8. Land &Shoreline Use 9. Housing 10. Aesthetics 11. Light&Glare 12. Recreation 13. Historic&Cultural Preservation 14. Transportation 15. Public Services 16. Utilities COMMENTS: We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Director or Authorized Rep esentative Date 9,571 JUL 0 3 1990 reTC? . 111)1 INTIENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CI i Y OF RE of Loi DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET PUBLIC WORKS CUSTOMER SERVICES ECF-070-90 APPLICATION NO(S).: SA-070-90 PROPONENT: Renton School District#403 PROJECT TITLE: SATORI SCHOOL BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: This project involves converting a grassed playfield of a former elementary school into a paved and landscaped 76 car parking lot to serve the increased parking needs caused by the schools present use as a vocational training school. I ' LOCATION: 315 Garden Avenue North • TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: X ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION CURRENT PLANNING i LONG RANGE PLANNING i, PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT x' OTHERS: STO/ /t4 wA r6 COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. !LEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P.M. ON July 18, 1990. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: S-4-Qn.1rn APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS X NOT APPROVED m The drainage plans for this proposal shall comply with the core and special requirements contained in Section 1.2 and 1.3 of Chapter 1, the hydrologic analysis methods contained in Chapter 3, the hydraulic analysis and .design methods contained in Chapter 4, and the erosion/sedimentation control plan and practices contained in Chapter 5 of the 1990 King County Surface Water .Design Manual. aJ. cj S,E c f ly 0,4/(t&/7V N STD. /Jt 7,4-(4 5 •Pkic �GL oN;&o�- /F�`'`' /fe 7ec�r( wi AN l�4 c-� T/Z� Ovrt e - /�i/JF Q O/L l wAT1 ie- 7""PA,0-7-0 &reetO %0 H4 '4 64Rzt-eYipNING DM.ION CITY OF;i NOT* JUL, 1 8 19.0 DATE: 7—/7--�� SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE J 1 RENTON''_,<_IMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DE. ,3TMENT ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET '� I Q REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: t k-5 DATE CIRCULATED: July 2, 1990 COMMENTS DUE: July 18, 1990 EFC-070-90 . I APPLICATION NO(S): SA-070-90 I PROPONENT: Renton School District#403 PROJECT TITLE: SATORI SCHOOL BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: This project involves converting a grassed playfield of a former elementary school into a paved and landscaped 76 car parking lot to serve the increased parking needs caused iby the school's present use as a vocational training school. I LOCATION: 315 Garden Avenue North SITE AREA: 3.2 acres BUILDING AREA (gross): 33,640 sq.ft. I IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS: PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth 2. Air 3. Water 4. Plants 5. Animals 6. Energy& Natural Resources 7. Environmental Health I 8. Land & Shoreline Use I 9. Housing I 10. Aesthetics 11. Light &Glare 12. Recreation 13. Historic &Cultural Preservation 14. Transportation 15. Public Services 16. Utilities COMMENTS: /��-- 'e'er 21.a•1 >,d---/GC We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of prob impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Z' I , ' -''' ' _i i_'„ * Z.,;44/--,"e-_) 7----1. c,' — 9e) L :.......a•..... ..t fl:..,,..a.... n..at ....:,...J n..._..__-....a..a...., r _a_ 1 RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF-070-90 APPLICATION NO(S).: SA-070-90 PROPONENT: Renton School District#403 PROJECT TITLE: SATORI SCHOOL BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: This project involves converting a grassed playfield of a former elementary school into a paved and landscaped 76 car parking lot to serve the increased parking needs caused by the schools present use as a vocational training school. LOCATION: 315 Garden Avenue North' • TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT 1,; COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION CURRENT PLANNING LONG RANGE PLANNING --si. PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. P IEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P.M. ON July 18, 1990. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: P -It k5 APPROVED '' `� APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED / P 1'�•(� --�_ y ti,)•,,,l,.-J.,._.//,, 7 ,,.:;.'. �.C_, 5I-1 tt-..(= l.�,J. -14'1'c 1-. 1..n,..,.. e.....4 -7 1- !_..- {•.c.... -?A- 2-1-4-i- .__, . l.: , .,.., - ! ..r:X i' ,}} e.. !,,� _,,,,,..:); ,c' _i,r; 1'714:11''' .l%l j..e'''S) /f' :r° C"• 1-/'"Y�.' 4- PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF RENTON JUL - 9 ?990 HEL-EiVEC , .. ATE: 7 e .CJ S , A URE OF DIRE TOR :.•AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE , t{ RENTON', ,_,IMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DE .Jr{TMENT ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: DATE CIRCULATED: July 2, 1990 COMMENTS DUE: July 18, 1990 EFC-070-90 APPLICATION NO(S): SA-070-90 PROPONENT: Renton School District#403 I � PROJECT TITLE: SATORI SCHOOL BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: This project involves converting a grassed playfield of a former elementary school into a paved and landscaped 76 car parking lot to serve the increased parking needs caused by the school's present use as a vocational training school. LOCATION: 315 Garden Avenue North SITE AREA: 3.2 acres BUILDING AREA (gross): 33,640 sq. ft. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS: PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth 2. Air • 3. Water I 4. Plants 5. Animals 6. Energy& Natural Resources 7. Environmental Health 8. Land &Shoreline Use 9. Housing 10. Aesthetics 11. Light & Glare I 12. Recreation 13. Historic & Cultural Preservation 14. Transportation 15. Public Services 16. Utilities COMMENTS: We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this! proposal. iyyd Qinr»ti iro of rlirontnr nr ni Ithnri7ori Ronrocontativo flat RE+NTpp�,1 FIRE DEPy'. FIRE PREVFH'IQ"d BLt EPT: RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET RECEIVED ECF-070-90 APPLICATION NO(S).: SA-070-90 PROPONENT: Renton School District#403 - i PROJECT TITLE: SATORI SCHOOL BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: This project involves converting a grassed playfield of a former elementary school into a paved and landscaped 76 car parking lot to serve the increased parking needs caused by the schools present use as a vocational training school. LOCATION: 315 Garden Avenue North TO PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION ` FIRE PREVENTION.BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION CURRENT PLANNING LONG RANGE PLANNING PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P.M. ON July 18, 1990. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: Y2. C/ APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED ,LAAINING DIVISION • crr'OF i?E r ON 19.90 • Z(A162 -i_ � 4Y4TE: S /77 SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR ( kUTHORIZEQ REPRESENTATIVE �� RENTOW-_._IMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DE .._:TTMENT ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET �--�� REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: ` Lt..l LA( U►�ax DATE CIRCULATED: July 2, 1990 COMMENTS DUE: July 18, 1990 EFC-070-90 i APPLICATION NO(S): SA-070-90 PROPONENT: Renton School District#403 PROJECT TITLE: SATORI SCHOOL BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: This project involves converting a grassed playfield of a former elementary school into a paved and landscaped 76 car parking lot to serve the increased parking needs caused by the school's present use as a vocational training school. LOCATION: 315 Garden Avenue North SITE AREA: 3.2 acres BUILDING AREA (gross): 33,640 sq. ft. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS: PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth 2. Air 3. Water 4. Plants 5. Animals 6. Energy& Natural Resources 7. Environmental Health 8. Land & Shoreline Use 9. Housing 10. Aesthetics 11. Light & Glare 12. Recreation 13. Historic & Cultural Preservation 14. Transportation 15. Public Services 16. Utilities COMMENTS: We have reviewed this applicatipn with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or-areas where additio al information is needed to properly assess this proposal. ;innate ira of firarfnr nr Ai ithnri7ari Ranrasantativa nata RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF-070-90 APPLICATION NO(S).: SA-070-90 PROPONENT: Renton School District#403 • PROJECT TITLE: SATORI SCHOOL BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: This project involves converting a grassed playfield of a for er elementary school into a paved and landscaped 76 car parking lot to serve the increased parking needs caused by the schools present use as a vocational training school. LOCATION: 315 Garden Avenue North TO PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION ' FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION CURRENT PLANNING LONG RANGE PLANNING PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT ' OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DE ARTMENT BY 5:00 P.M. ON July 18, 1990. REyIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: lA en III/ APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED . .01,1004 1991 �'t.'•Syw I • • �� , i • SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE -1 ;: .City of;Renton :::: TechnicalAd:visor Committee Y . :! viEETLNG NOTICE: :: : .: > >::>: ::>:>; :: ::A July 27, 1990 To: Paul Lumbert Mark Isaacson Fire Marshall Sam Chastain Penny Bryant Jim Hanson From: Don Erickson, Chairman • Meeting Date July 27;1990 Time: 8:30 AM •Location: Third Floor ConferenceH..:0. 00m Agenda is listed below. TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE AGENDA J U LY 27, 1990 Third Floor Conference Room Commencing at 8:30 AM TIME/KEY PARTICIPANTS NEW PROJECTS RENTON SCHOOL DIST 403, SATORI ECF;SA;SP-070-90 The applicant proposes to convert a grassed play field of the former elementary school into a paved and landscaped 76 car parking lot. RENTON SCHOOL DIST 403, RVTI ECF;SA-069-90 The applicant proposes to convert a grassed play field of the former elementary school into a paved and landscaped 76 car parking lot. HARRIS SHORT PLAT SHPL;V-007-90 Applicant seeks to subdivide a 35,980 square foot parcel into four lots, with a private roadway on the eastern perimeter of the site. The parcel is zoned R-1, for single- family use. Lot #4 is .developed with a single-family home which will be retained; the remaining lots are vacant. WESTERN DISTRIBUTORS SHORT PLAT SHPL-063-90 Applicant seeks a short plat to move a property line between two lots approximately 250 feet north of the . present property line. This change will allow an existing building to be located entirely on one lot, instead of straddling the lot line as it does at present. ::. .:: .::::... .<.>: ;;::.; . : :;:::::::: ;: ::.:t•.EPARTNIENTOF PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC;WORKS . :..::. :.•...::.:. ::..::::::::::::::: : .:;:::;:.::.::.;:;;::.;: :::>::TECHNI :>::::::�:»>;<::>;;::;::: :: ::<:::>>::::>: >::�::.: .:::....:: . ..... .. . . .... .V ISQ RY COMMITTEE. . .. .. ..... . .. ....::...::.. .::.. ....:: ..:... ;:;::;ST FF::RE .. >: . ....................................... ... ....... ..'.A': ,, :: .... `A.:;PLI ANT< > > :.:s` < > "' ent> ><?p00.0 ::D tri > >:> < < >' : ; <�; ••���•• ••� I'PLICAN7,:::::;:::::........ . ........:.Renton•.:School District..; :: :.: :.::.:> . ..; :.;:......�. . :....... ............ < �`E•:::�;'isim,;... 'i:'::::�:::i:i:5>i:g::: :i::::'>i: ::i:•.`'•i:Sa for N::: :P: k : ::: � ':i:i i :: : ::• ' <; :: : :: :��:�>:�>:>; P.:.F3QJ ,C7.:.::::: :.::.:.:.::<.;;.;.: :. SartorlNewParking :.:.: :...:.::..::....:..::::::.:.:::::..:::..::::.; `ENVI• <:NM:E :: 4N.:..:.::.. .....:. .CK. 1ST.g..:.•::..• .ECF,SA0.70.90:.:..:....:::....:::.....:. ..::..•:i..: i.:...: :..:..:. ..... ......... C ION F P PO AL > ``: : h: playfield :::::<::..:<.;:;...:5:.;�.:. : ..::>;; ..:...;;RQ:.::.:S.>:<��:, :;......::.:::...The.aPplicant; ro oses:fo�converta:grassed .:a. ..field:. ;.::school<_int aved`>and :>::>::::>::::>::::<::::;:::>;:<:;>::;::::: :<.; :::;:: :::>::: :> ::::.::::::::.:::.::::< ::; ::; of.:the:'fo�mer, elementa ... Ian: ed::7 arrki..g of?..::: ::>:.::>:: »»: <>>:: ::<: :>:>:>:: . a dsca ed 6 carp` ar n to . 9. T :::<:: :: OCA :.::.:.:..:(0 ..:::: R.:.. ::..�:..:...5. 315 Garden Avenue North ?.;:.;;:.;:.;:.;;;�.;:.:;::;:.::<.>:.:.;:.:;:.;:.:.;- r-r—L1 1'' = 200' ❑ n ❑ ❑ i_ IIIIII I I I I I o Cr 100' 200' 300' El El pw ❑ U SARTORI r HEALTH OCCUPATIONS I O Z /---3c APPRENTICESHIP CENTER n1 II lJ ] w� J� ■ /. . '''' • 1 0 ❑ P-I CIi DRIVEWAY 4E1E1 . I I , 1 . , _ ( I ❑ 4 • rl , 1t . ❑ n I, 1 i I i ❑ I 1 1 P-I \ ± Z Z I l ❑ ❑ ^ I 1 11 ' < Q _ < I l ABASE - a - 0 Elm . . .. 0 L, I I 4 I 1 ❑ Wcr . ❑ ❑ -+ 1 : I N. 3rd ST. SINGLE FAMILY HOUSES ❑ ❑ Gf l I I -1- V 10 ri r ❑ n ^ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ I 1 Li El] n ❑ (-1 1 i _J0;:. JiV!.:'(IN • Technical Advisory Committ;.,-.taff Report Sartori-New Parking • • July 27, 1990 Page 2 LAND USE 1. Whether the proposed project is consistent with the Comprehensive plan zoning designation and with Goals. Policies and Objectives set forth in the Plan. The existing school is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan Map, which designates the site for Public/Quasi-Public uses and with the Comprehensive Plan Elements for public use. 2. Whether the proposed project is consistent with the land use map zoning designation and applicable Zoning Ordinance components. The subject property is zoned Public Zone (P-1), which permits schools and their accessory uses. The proposed development adequately addresses the development standards for school parking lots. 3. Whether the proposed development is consistent with the Zoning Ordinance and other applicable regulations/standards. The parcel to the north of the subject property is zoned for Light Industrial;(L-1) use, the property to the east and south is zoned for Multi-family Residential (R-4), and the property west is zoned Business District (B-1). The project as proposed adequately addresses the development standards regarding the.adjacent zones. 4. Whether the project is compatible with land uses in the vicinity. The area around this project site has been developed for a variety of light industrial, commercial and residential land uses. This project has provided the appropriate setbacks from these land uses. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Whether the applicant has adequately identified and addressed the following environmental impacts likely to occur in conjunction with the proposed development. a. Aesthetics/Land Use Impacts: The proposed development consist of adding seventy-six parking stalls to an existing parking lot at the Sartori School. This school building:was converted from an elementary school to part of the Renton Vocational Technical Institute. The change in the student body has necessitated the increase in the size of the parking area. Currently, there are fifty-four parking spaces in the existing parking area. This area will be striped to provide 80 parking stalls. The parking area will then provide a total of 156 parking stalls for students, faculty and staff. The plans submitted indicate a 13-foot wide landscape strip along N. 4th Street and a 20- foot wide landscape strip along Garden Ave. N., which the applicant .proposes to landscape with turf, a Wax-leaf Privet hedge and three Deodara Cedars. Due to the fact that this area fronts onto a residential area, staff is requiring the applicant to provide an enhanced landscape plan to provide a strong visual buffer to the residential area. The enhanced landscape plan shall include a variety of shrubs to;provide color, an earthen berm along Garden Avenue N. and shade trees along both street boundaries and within the interior planters. Along the west boundary of the existing parking area, there is a ten-foot asphalt strip between the parking area and a chain-link fence. This asphalt strip should be removed and replaced with a landscape strip. Mitigation Measures: The applicant shall submit an enhanced landscaping plan, subject to approval of the Planning Division, which Includes the following: a) additional plant • • Technical Advisory Committee Staff Report Sartori-New Parking July 27, 1990 Page 3 materials along both N. 4th Street and Garden Ave. N.; b) an earthen berm along Garden Ave. N.; c) addition of trees in the interior plants; and d).the replacement of the asphalt strip adjacent to the existing parking area with a landscape strip. Policy Nexus: Parking and Loading Ordinance 4-14, Landscape Requirements 4-32-34 and Comprehensive Plan Section III.C. b. Natural Environment Impacts: The portion of the project site that is now proposed for devleloprnent was leveled and used as a turfed playfield for the elementary school. Only a minor amount of grading will be required to prepare the base of the new parking area. The project is located within Zone 1 of the Aquifer Protection Area. The applicant will need to provide baffles in the oil/water seperators in order to.ensure p llotection of the water quality. Mitigation Measures: Baffles will need to be provide in the proposed oil/water separators. Policy Nexus: Environmental Review Ordinance 4-6 c. Traffic Impacts: Construction activities, including grading and paving of the proposed parking area, could generate traffic which would impact area roadways during the peak traffic hours. Based on the fact that N. 4th Street is designated as a Major Arterial, measures will be required (e.g., limited hauling hours) to mitigate traffic impacts from hauling activities on area roadways. A previous roadway project in this area Indicated that the existing fer1ce along N. 4th Street was located 1-1/2 to 2 feet into the public right-of-way. The applicant will be required to provide a site plan with the property line correctly located and to relocate the fence out of the public right-of-way. Mitigation Measures: Construction traffic to and from the project site shall be limited to the hours between 8 A.M. and 3:30 P.M. Policy Nexus: Environmental Review Ordinance 4-6 d. Noise, Light and Glare Impacts: Noise, light and glare are anticipated in conjunction with the grading and paving of the parking area. Some mitigation of these impacts will be achieved through the recommended limitations hauling hours and construction activities. During the operation of the parking area, glare could be produced from the required security lighting. This impact would be mitigated, to the extent possible, by the additional landscaping recommended by staff. Mitigation Measures: 1) See Traffic Mitigation. 2) Provide additional landscaping around and within the proposed parking lot. Policy Nexus: Landscaping Requirements 4-31-34, Comprehensive Plan Section III.C. e. Public Services 1) Recreation Impact: The Parks and Recreation Department recommends that the proponent consider some type of on-site recreation amenities, such as outdoor hard surface courts and picnic tables, to be used by their patrons. Mitigation Measures: None required. Policy Nexus: Environmental Review Ordinance 4-6 • ' Technical Advisory Committee Staff Report Sartori- New Parking July 27, 1990 Page 4 2) Storm Water Impacts: The paving of the parking lot will decrease the:amount of permeable area on the project site and could increase the amount of'storm run-off from the site. Mitigation Measures: The applicant shall provide the following materials subject to the Public Works Division approval: a) drainage plans for'this project complying with the core and special requirements contained in Section 1.2 and 1.3 of Chapter 1, the hydrologic analysis methods contained in Chapter 3, the hydraulic analysis and design methods contained in Chapter 4, and the erosion/sedimentation control plan and practices contained in Chapter 5 of the 1990 King County Surface Water Design Manual; b) install control/flow restrictor manhole; and c) baffles for the oil/water separators. Policy Nexus: Environmental Review Ordinance 4-6 :»:::; :�: > �R:�..C:OI1lL... ....N....P.►.....0..�1.5.:»::;>»::::»:::�>>::Tha ..he.. . .C. ssue.a .. a.. . . ..... ......::9:..::.:..n..:�:::: �IJIiEi a e wi h d s 1. The applicant shall provide a revised landscaping plan indicating: a) the species, size and location of plant materials to be used around the boundary and within the parking lets; b) an earthen berm along Garden Ave. N. to further buffer the residential area; and c) replacing the paving strip with landscaping along the west boundary of the existing parking lot. 2. The applicant shall provide an erosion control plan, subject to approval by the Public Works Division,which includes restrictions of hauling routes and hours of hauling operations to between 8 A.M. and 3:30 P.M. Vr � �'it�:>>� tv ntri.tFe- o ec . T mm n s .. .:�.ioUsC.....Y..ePartmeq...s.:ha.,..e...reviews. ��ndcomme.....edupp:.......:....:.p�....1:.......:...:..::..es..:...:..:.......�..::..:,::: .....:........................... ............................ • • • • • • .............................................................. • RENTON;;. ;.,MMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DE _ .3TMENT • ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: -e- DATE CIRCULATED: July 2, 1990 COMMENTS DUE: July 18, 1990 EFC-070-90 APPLICATION NO(S): SA-070-90 PROPONENT: Renton School District #403 PROJECT TITLE: SATORI SCHOOL BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: This project involves converting a grassed playfield of a former elementary school into a paved and landscaped 76 car parking lot to serve the increased parking needs caused by the school's present use as a vocational training school. LOCATION: 315 Garden Avenue North SITE AREA: 3.2 acres BUILDING AREA (gross): 33,640 Sq. ft. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS: PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth 2. Air 3. Water 4. Plants 5. Animals 6. Energy& Natural Resources 7. Environmental Health 8. Land &Shoreline Use 9. Housing 10. Aesthetics 11. Light & Glare 12. Recreation 13. Historic &Cultural Preservation 14. Transportation 15. Public Services 16. Utilities COMMENTS: -151 sus 4p29P2i A-cg /4-S Lot-5G A S 61W4A. 65" NG'- jk-{A 4 (Au-6 sch PiK C, lb r'�ovtr,� . We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. 7/6 1 -- i RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET F Llt•' ?li':'':;DiVlibION ^fi" OF ilrl'TO EC I-070-90 APPLICATION NO(S).: SA-070-90 �jj - 3 1995 PROPONENT: Renton School District#403 ;- v; ER, :"„v; PROJECT TITLE: SATORI SCHOOL BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: This project involves converting a grassed playfield of a former elementary school into a paved and landscaped 76 car parking lot to serve the increased parking needs caused by the schools present use as a vocational training school. LOCATION: 315 Garden Avenue North • TO: +, ' PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: • UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION I FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION CURRENT PLANNING \ic LONG RANGE PLANNING PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING., PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P.M. ON July 18, 1990. - REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: L/�0(4c APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED I � Co► c.r ►-tea c.9/ Two-- C., YwZ.nA Goss e� IcJ SPAt.e - itkou vT`t, Se-J.-sec L ►n,s, u��c 'fly Letsx.onk OF -C'I yK ca"' Skroe-i 4-,,,ta,� c.,u,,_. c, It ) N(a 5 9 /bC- -t'�� � /� - Bv4c ►J (-142— p * t--oss ©F oP SIltez •� DATE: 7(Y/70 SIGNAT R OF DIRE TO- ,� AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE I jut_ 0 9 1990 RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CIN OF RENt DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET PUBLIC WORKS CUSTOMER SERVICES ECF-070-90 APPLICATION NO(S).: SA-070-90 PROPONENT: Renton School District #403 PROJECT TITLE: SATORI SCHOOL BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: This project involves converting a grassed playfield of a former elementary school into a paved and landscaped 76 car parking lot to serve the increased parking needs caused by the schools present use as a vocational training school. LOCATION: 315 Garden Avenue North TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION CURRENT PLANNING LONG RANGE PLANNING PARKS AND" �RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: W G✓�l-, COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P.M. ON July 18, 1990. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: WAX APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED k • /Q/ 7--12.- �o DATE: SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AU HORIZED REPRESENTATIVE RENTON -,JMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEF._.dTMENT ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: 1- DATE CIRCULATED: July 2, 1990 COMMENTS DUE: July 18, 1990 EFC-070-90 APPLICATION NO(S): SA-070-90 PROPONENT: Renton School District#403 PROJECT TITLE: SATORI SCHOOL BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: This project involves converting a grassed playfield of a former elementary school into a paved and landscaped 76 car parking lot to serve the increased parking needs caused by the school's present use as a vocational training school. • LOCATION: ;315 Garden Avenue North SITE AREA: ,3.2 acres BUILDING AREA (gross): 33,640 sq. ft. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS: PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth 2. Air 3. Water 4. Plants 5. Animals 6. Energy& Natural Resources 7. Environmental Health 8. Land & Shoreline Use 9. Housing 10. Aesthetics 11. Light&Glare 12. Recreation 13. Histo ic & Cultural Preservation 14. Transportation 15. Public Services 16. Utilities COMMENTS: , (I) Ai57 f C !� ®,500T. .O I�t46774 f 4/#ae, i9 /3fKKFL0L 0,6vic4 rO. c. v, . o A Tn4 frieff-04<- / iagOrvee i✓. gge,4,te 5N4wh/ 0 eNJ 4,,Avve/ Lhi Gc /PICK 1-6°L'V Of: C� d C/y t6c ,./446 ' ,- f,E 'n (A-ram rsT6e foe( Li4w/v ie/c4T76 ,5 y ST Air 7a 5,�-v,� o4 izfmf X cii e 6 es, ( o,'D vcy � T�/ /s /v, 1 LGary p /' ' KIEA til) /drt,1iT" .4 Lw /(am5 sPR/'faE Hie)/ .5- To s�2 f a a� �T-E� 5--/t- f t° K v,f c , C-o 0 cs We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. • 7_i7 - ?0 Pirinitirrn of rlirnrtnr nr Ai"thnri P •" _ I RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF-070-90 APPLICATION NO(S).: SA-0;70-90 PROPONENT: Renton School District #403 PROJECT TITLE: SATORI SCHOOL • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: This project involves converting a grassed playfield of a former elementary school into a paved and landscaped 76 car parking lot to serve the increased parking needs caused by the schools present use as a vocational training school. LOCATION: 315 Garden Avenue North TO: • PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT • SCHEDULED ERC DATE: ' ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT I COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION CURRENT PLANNING LONG RANGE PLANNING PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT • OTHERS: . COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P.M. ON July 18, 1990. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: \ d I ice r APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED r!- F1i Eii4Gi orviSlON rrry t)F l ll:"',I-rON JUL 1 8 1990 evylkA4 DATE: SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR-OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE RENTON ;,JMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEf-...:r3TMENT ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Pc:A 2. DATE CIRCULATED: July 2, 1990 COMMENTS DUE: July 18, 1990 EFC-070-90 APPLICATION NO(S): SA-070-90 PROPONENT: Renton School District#403 PROJECT TITLE: SATORI SCHOOL BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: This project involves converting a grassed playfield of a former elementary school into a paved and landscaped 76 car parking lot to serve the increased parking needs caused by the school's present use as a vocational training school. LOCATIONin, 315 Garden Avenue North SITE AREA+1,3.2 acres BUILDING AREA (gross): 33,640 sq. ft. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS: PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth 2. Air 3. Water: 4. Plants' 5. Animals 6. Enerl& Natural Resources 7. Environmental Health 8. Land & Shoreline Use 9. Housing h' 10. Aesthetics 11. Light&Glare 12. Recreation 13. Historic &Cultural Preservation 14. Transportation 15. Public Services 16. Utilities • COMMENTS: We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. " gAxAAN-61-20-1(Y-v.,-(1.1- ' . Sinnnti irn of flirertnr or Ai tthorizP.rT.. •r.snntntivp ` ,t� RENTON _ MMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DE ATMENT ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: -1—Vad,yr- ip`:6 DATE CIRCULATED: July 2, 1990 COMMENTS DUE: July 18, 1990 • EFC-070-90 APPLICATION NO(S): SA-070-90 PROPONENT: Renton School District #403 PROJECT TITLE: SATORI SCHOOL BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: This project involves converting a grassed playfield of a former elementary school into a paved and landscaped 76 car parking lot to serve the increased parking needs caused by the school's present use as a vocational training school. LOCATION: 315 Garden Avenue North SITE AREA: 3.2 acres BUILDING AREA (gross): 33,640 sq. ft. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS: PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth r�J 2. Air 3. Water 4. Plants 5. Animals 6. Energy& Natural Resources 7. Environmental Health 8. Land &Shoreline Use 9. Housing 10. Aesthetics 11. •Light & Glare i 12. Recreation 13. Historic & Cultural Preservation 14. Transportation 15. Public Services ��- 16. Utilities COMMENTS: • S") d.4.) t`�-r "�.� ,_��� !� �+ E l,n % 17-• P 1. �✓�,44- q' I - �• I �� � I.J� !7 L/s y.�„'...�r..�%C_..�T... I /� •c. ///^.� ••"� .. wr••;� r ex,05 C e_ ` / L-f-e 2-4 .L..s // o Y Z. ^f-*• /'76. /^7"- c> 4-74- We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas-in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. lagORIER JUL 10 3 1990 NTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 11 Cl I r 6F RENT ON DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW'SHEET PUBLIC WORKS CUSTOMER SERVICES ECF-070-90 • APPLICATION NO(S).: SA-070-90 I f PROPONENT: Renton School District #403 PROJECT TITLE: SATORI SCHOOL BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: This project involves converting a grassed playfield of a former elementary school into a paved and landscaped 76 car parking lot to serve the increased parking , needs caused by the schools present use as a vocational training school. LOCATION: 315 Garden Avenue North TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION CURRENT PLANNING LONG RANGE PLANNING PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P.M. ON July 18, 1990. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: ' / l'->c› APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED s17 fl 0 �7 r o? IL I I e, I D / 4-1 c�t C� �. I� E 4 T e •'G-� �.. -�-_ �/ �..> C c<- r3 ' �' rat /. r, J L.c k�// G. /G- 'l" L i e� � • t�'_. �'e::/a •1 / 71.E , 2-GV; c :r ex; �JL^ Ll � s / 7'G /-S /pL_=�} 'p� �J p 4-,(-44 l/..cp i::iy.t.�, .-���, .. c�.-� � -, A a �., -- )L�i- .3. J c) _,. J. .9/c� , • I "J /•\TE: /2,/"7"1-?› SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR n`. ,UTHORI-LEio REPRESENTATIV RENTON'C.,',.._11MUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEV, TMENT ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: DATE CIRCULATED: July 2, 1990 COMMENTS DUE: July 18, 1990 • EFC-070-90 APPLICATION NO(S): SA-070-90 PROPONENT: Renton School District #403 PROJECT TITLE: SATORI SCHOOL BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: This project involves converting a grassed playfield of a f.rmer elementary school into a paved and landscaped 76 car parking lot to serve the increased parking needs caused by the school's present use as a vocational training school. LOCATION: 315 Garden Avenue North SITE AREA: 3.2 acres BUILDING AREA (gross): 33,640 sql ft. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS: PROBABLE PROB IBLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth 2. Air 3. Water 4. Plants 5. Animals 6. Energy & Natural Resources 7. Environmental Health 8. Land & Shoreline Use 9. Housing 10. Aesthetics 11. Light & Glare 12. -Recreation 13. Historic & Cultural Preservation • 14. Transportation 15. Public Services 16. Utilities 'COMMENTS: NO �,��� c7' y_D 77(t (f( s 74/-6 -F6 1t`7by 5Vir-6( We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we h ve expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly asses this proposal. / 7--- 90 of nirprtnr nr Ai lihnri-inrl nnnrncnnl ,li''n iDgglaTelE \ 1, ENTON COMMUNITY DEVE LOPMENT DEPARTMENT JUL'0 3 1990 DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET • CITY OF RENI ON PUBLIC WORKS GUSTO A 9oVICES APPLICATION NO(S).: SA-070-90 PROPONENT: Renton School District#403 PROJECT TITLE: SATORI SCHOOL BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: This project involves converting a grassed playfield of a former elementary school into a paved and landscaped 76 car parking lot to serve the increased parking needs caused by the schools present use as a vocational training school. , LOCATION: 315 Garden Avenue North TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION CURRENT PLANNING LONG RANGE PLANNING PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT l( OTHERS: 5,6w ( COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P.M. ON July 18, 1990. REIIEWINGDEPARTMENT/DIVISION: �o�weN >‹ APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED • 1 8 v:19,ri ' I • u r P, r � I SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE RENTON'COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DErARTMENT ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET 0 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: (1.21" DATE CIRCULATED: July 2, 1990 COMMENTS DUE: July 18, 1990 EFC-070-90 • APPLICATION NO(S): SA-070-90 PROPONENT: Renton School District#403 PROJECT TITLE: SATORI SCHOOL BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: This project involves converting a grassed playfield of a former elementary school into a paved and landscaped 76 car parking lot to serve the increased parking needs caused by the school's present use as a vocational training school. LOCATION: 315 Garden Avenue North SITE AREA: 3.2 acres BUILDING AREA (gross): 33,640 sq.ft. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS: PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth 2. Air 3. Water 4. Plants 5. Animals 6. Energy&Natural Resources 7. Environmental Health 8. Land &Shoreline Use 9. Housing 10. Aesthetics 11. Light&Glare 12. Recreation 13. Historic&Cultural Preservation 14. Transportation 15. Public Services 16. Utilities COMMENTS: We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we Have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Director or Authorized Rep esentative Date 11 1 I � i yagg tE. I t � 1 ENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT JUt 0 3 1990 CI i 7' OF RI:0410N DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET PUBLIC WORKS CUSTOMER SERVICES ECF-070-90 APPLICATION NO(S).; SA-070-90 PROPONENT: Renton School District#403 PROJECT TITLE: SATORI SCHOOL BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: This project involves converting a grassed playfield of a former elementary school into a paved and landscaped 76 car parking lot to serve the Increased parking needs caused by the schools present use as a vocational training school. LOCATION: 315 Garden Avenue North TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: X ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION CURRENT PLANNING LONG RANGE PLANNING PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT x OTHERS: STo R/vt (/l,A 7-6�— I COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P.M. ON July 18, 1990. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: S+bkYY\ APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS X NOT APPROVED ' CD The drainage plans for this proposal shall comply with the core and special requirements contained in Section 1.2 and 1.3 of Chapter 1, the hydrologic analysis methods contained in Chapter 3, the hydraulic analysis and design methods contained in Chapter 4, and the erosion/sedimentation control plan and practices contained in Chapter 5 of the 1990 King County Surface Water Design Manual. Js2 c,r aii-- /-ti7O ti STD. /J6Ti4/e. S , `7J Iivs71,9GL- con.1 q-- /iee0"' /efr z'fC7`arC 4,giv c-, • c T/Z - D V T Le 7- //P4E- 4 r g4` Q o lc. / g- 0WAa'A-7-o t.yeelOs To ,K4 v4 1 • _ DATE: 7/7 O? . SIiGNATURE OF DIRECTOR; '3 AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE RENTON C JMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEi- aTMENT ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: 1 .L'+r c5 DATE CIRCULATED: July 2, 1990 COMMENTS DUE: July 18, 1990 EFC-070-90 • APPLICATION NO(S): SA-070-90 PROPONENT: Renton School District #403 PROJECT TITLE: SATORI SCHOOL BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: This project involves converting a grassed playfield of a former elementary school into a paved and landscaped 76.car parking lot to serve the increased parking needs caused by the school's present use as a vocational training school. LOCATION: 315 Garden Avenue North SITE AREA: 3.2 acres BUILDING AREA (gross): 33,640 sq. ft. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS: PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR , INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth 2. Air 3. Water 4. Plants 5. Animals 6. Energy& Natural Resources 7. Environmental Health 8. Land &Shoreline Use 9. Housing 10. Aesthetics 11. Light & Glare 12. Recreation 13. Historic &Cultural Preservation 14. Transportation 15. Public Services 16. Utilities COMMENTS: We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of proba impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. • • RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF-070-90 APPLICATION NO(S).: SA-070-90 1 PROPONENT: Renton School•District #403 PROJECT TITLE: . SATORI SCHOOL BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: This project involves converting a grassed playfield of a • former elementary school into a paved and landscaped 76 car parking lot to serve the increased parking needs caused by the schools present use as a vocational training school. • LOCATION: 315 Garden Avenue North TO: • PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU I ` • POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT • BUILDING DIVISION 1 PLANNING DIVISION 1 CURRENT PLANNING LONG RANGE PLANNING ..sr\ PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS,REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT , DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P.M. ON July 18, 1990. 1 REVIEWING 'Pa-✓ IEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: kS • 1 APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED •J J // /' �.a: 1. �' , ..._. c t �J•'f:c -. t......'ja. z .� � •! /�.� W.' ` r yr. • ! ' • PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF RENTON JUL - `i 1990 °V r E ,) f, ; ��� .ATE. 7V 'S A URE OF DIRECTOR • ' ';UTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE RENTON _;_MMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DE ITMENT ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Ft v.` DATE CIRCULATED: July 2, 1990 COMMENTS DUE: July 18, 1990 EFC-070-90 APPLICATION NO(S): SA-070-90 PROPONENT: Renton School District#403 PROJECT TITLE: SATORI SCHOOL BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: This project involves converting a grassed playfield of a former elementary school into a paved and landscaped 76 car parking lot to serve the increased parking needs caused by the school's present use as a vocational training school. LOCATION: 315 Garden Avenue North SITE AREA: 3.2 acres BUILDING AREA (gross): 33,640 sq. ft. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS: PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth 2. Air 3. Water 4. Plants 5. Animals 6. Energy& Natural Resources 7. Environmental Health 8. Land & Shoreline Use 9. Housing 10. Aesthetics 11. Light & Glare 12. Recreation 13. Historic &Cultural Preservation 14. Transportation 15. Public Services 16. Utilities COMMENTS: We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified - areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. �.-.� s- i? 6 Sictnati ire of Dirertor or Ai Ithnri7ed Renresnntgti\,p n ,t. / RENTON FIRE DEPT FIRE PREVENTION`t,REA1.1 RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT JUL DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET bb REED ECF4070-90 APPLICATION NO(S).: SA-070-90 PROPONENT: Renton School District#403 PROJECT TITLE: SATORI SCHOOL • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: This project involves converting a grassed playfield of a former elementary school into a paved and landscaped 76 car parking lot to serve the increased parking needs caused by the schools present use as a vocational training school. LOCATION: 315 Garden Avenue North , TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION.BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION CURRENT PLANNING LONG RANGE PLANNING PARKS AND RECREATION.DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P.M. ON July 18, 1990. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: ft 1(e„ c/ APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED pLAN vtS10N i, :! ,trs: D1 1990 SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR ;AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE RENTON ,.:...jMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DE r{TMENT ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEETI REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: ,fit-t.c tJct DATE CIRCULATED: July 2, 1990 COMMENTS DUE: July 18, 1990 EFC-070-90 APPLICATION NO(S): SA-070-90 PROPONENT: Renton School District #403 PROJECT TITLE: SATORI SCHOOL BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: This project involves converting a grassed playfield of a,former elementary school into a paved and landscaped 76 car parking lot to serve the increased parking needs caused by the school's present use as a vocational training school. LOCATION: 315 Garden Avenue North SITE AREA: 3.2 acres BUILDING AREA (gross): 33,640 sq. ft. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS: PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth 2. Air 3. Water 4. Plants 5. Animals 6. Energy & Natural Resources 7. Environmental Health II 8. Land & Shoreline Use 9. Housing 10. Aesthetics 11. Light & Glare 12. Recreation 13. Historic & Cultural Preservation 14. Transportation 15. Public Services 16. Utilities _ I • COMMENTS: We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. ( 7 � (/' inn ti irr of rlirontnr nr AI ithnri70rl Rnnrn :nt-Iti'-n n-0 r' II r �� RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF-070-90 APPLICATION NO(S).: SA-070-90 al PROPONENT: Renton School District #403 PROJECT TITLE: SATORI SCHOOL BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: This project involves converting a grassed playfield of a former elementary school into a paved and landscaped 76 car parking lot to serve the increased parking needs caused by the schools present use as a vocational training school. LOCATION: 315 Garden Avenue North TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION CURRENT PLANNING LONG RANGE PLANNING it ' !I PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P.M. ON July 18, 1990. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: l ;� APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED gU(1i • • ///l/ l�TE: o , SIGNATUREEOFIRECTOR . UTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE 1. • �::�: OPMF >:�:ii:� �:��:�>:::�:�>:� �>:�:�>:�:�>�::<�:�:�>:DE PARTMENT:<i.OF::=:COMMI7I�7:�:"�':�:z�:i:DE�E L.... . ..... ................ ............................. ON.:40i > >>< ': i >�>� �� ERT .F� ATI :::.::.:.:;.:.;:::.:.:.:::.:;;:.:.:::.;:. >: :F<NOTIFICATION:.;O ::_ :<.:R P ERT1( O WN S :.<.; ..;:.:w.ithin.:3,0.0. reet.:.:ofthe:.:.:subgect;:;site::.:::;;:::.;:.::.>:. .;::::.. .:.:.. :. . PLANNING DIVISION ***FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY*** GUY OFRENTON PROJECT TITLE: S, .Ac . - c JUN 2 6 1990 APPLICANT: Ref SC-6A �{ 03 ., g�,+e0 6 irti j APPLICATION NUMBER: . — OHO •-"1b ' The _following is a list of property owners within 390 feet of the subj'ect';'site. The Community Development Department, will notify these -individuals of the proposed development. . NAME •, ADDRESS ASSESSOR'SPARCEL NUMBER Kennelly, John M. 315 Park Ave. N. Renton 98055 722400-0440-0 Nunn, Alta 323 Park Ave. N. Renton 98055 722400-045070 Dobson,'-Carol 329 Park Ave. N. Renton 98055 722400-0455-0 Dobson, Carol 331 Park Ave. N. Renton 98055 722400-0460-0 Dobson, Carol 335 Park Ave. N. Renton 98055 722400-0465-0 Dobson-, Carol 337 Park Ave. N. Renton 98055 722400-0470.0 Summs, Inc. 351 Park Ave. N. Wong, Linda & ' P.O. Box 24 Renton 98057 722400-0475=0 Yuen, Juliette Kessler, Lavina A. 314 Park Ave. N. Renton 98055 722400-0580-0 Kessler, Lavina A. 326 Park Ave. N. Renton 98055 722400-0590-0 Colee, Jeffrey "& Tamara 330 Park Ave. N: Renton 98055 722400-0595-0 Renton School Dist'. : 435 Main Ave. S: Renton 98055 722400-0600-0 Cook, Deborah E. 336 Park Ave. N. Renton 98055 722400-0605-0 Tjok, Ko-Tong 340 Park Ave. N: Renton 98055 722400-0610-0 Cook, Henry E. 346 Park Ave. N: Renton 98055 722400-0615-0 Cleworth, B.H. ' 350 Park Ave. N. Renton 98055 722400-0620'-0 Renton School Dist. 435 Main Ave. S: Renton 98055 756460-0170-0 Arundell , W lliam T. 1200 N. 3rd St. ' Renton 98055 756460-0180:-0 Bakko, Joanlotto 1204 N. 3rd St. ` Renton 98055 756460-0181-0 Ramsey, Walter G. & . Donna 1212 N. 3rd St. ` Renton 98055 756460-0182-0 Almberg, Mary E. 1206 N. 3rd St. ` Renton 98055 756460-0183-0 Simpson, Ruth ' 303 Garden Ave. 'N. 'Renton 98055 756460-0184-0 Neff, Charles P. 356 Garden Ave. 'N. 'Renton 98055 135230-0215-0 Ernest, .0. & Sharon 350 Garden Ave. N. Renton 98055 135230-0220-0 ' Curry, Joseph H. 346 Garden Ave. 'N. 'Renton 98055 135230-0225-0 Willenborg, David G. 338 Garden Ave. N. Renton 98055 135230-0235-0 Todd, Stuart W. 336 Garden Ave. N. Renton 98055 135230-0240-0 Tobacco, Mary 324 Garden Ave. N. Renton 98055 135230-0245-0 Poquette, Roger L. 328 Garden Ave. N. Renton 98055 135230-0250-0 NAME o ADDRESS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER Lundberg, Alma ` 326 Garden Ave. N. Renton 98055 135230-0255-0 Gordon;, Robert L. & , Arvilla F. 318 Garden Ave. N. Renton 98055 135230-0265-0 Friedli , Richard G. 314 Garden Ave. N. Renton 98055 135230-0275-0 Lueth, Greg C. 310 Garden Ave. N. Renton 98055 . 135230-0280-0 Smith, W.R. 359 Meadow Ave. N. Renton 98055 135230-0295-0 See, Richard A. 353 Meadow Ave. N. Renton 98055 135230-0300-0 • . Williams, D. Louise 347 Meadow Ave. N. Renton 98055 135230-0310-0 Pieper, E.R. 345 Meadow Ave. N. Renton 98055 135230-0315-0 Thomas, Vernie 341 Meadow Ave. N. Renton 98055 135230-0320-0 Barrett, John M. 339 Meadow Ave. N. Renton 98055 135230-0325-0 Provty, Carol° H. 335 Meadow Ave. N. Renton 98055 135230-0330-0 Holma, Darlene D. 329 Meadow Ave. N. Renton 98055 135230-0335-0 Jahn, Jack & Rossi , Rose 325 Meadow Ave. N. Renton 98055 • 135230-0340-0 Schultz, Norman M. 319 Meadow Ave. N. Renton 98055 - 135230..0345-0 Dobson, John W. 404 Park Ave. N. Renton 98055 722400-0625-0 . Arco Gas Station ' 405 Park Ave. N. Renton 98055 722400-0695-0 CERTIFICATION , I, MIc.M& L l{ YliNL ', hereby certify that the above list(s) of adjacent , property owners and their addresses were taken from the records of the King .County Assessor as prescribed by law. ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to: before me, a 'Notary Public, in and for the State of •,Washington residing at c (!/e.- on the ` U!6 day of 47 / /gq o . • 74 T � Signed:IT 4 ?4 / 74A . CERTIFICATION FOR MAILING I, ar{r v'L[C, cr , hereby certif that notices of the public meeting on the subject site plan approval were mailed on 3, ri1 O , to each listed ' adjacent property owner as prescribed by law. ATTEST: Subscribed;.and sworn to•.before ., me, a Notary Public, in a for the State of Washington residing at on the '3 day of ,i_e ,r, 1- /g G. 171 J S...,_,coar_40--- Signed: tzt,... sossivou CERTNOT2.doc 0,,�P��oni'p4:0��•,,�,�*to i. NOTARY v'�... • S -*- PUBLIC : 2: r . i Nam; fib.: 0: . 408iii i I O% . NOTICE OF PENDING SITE PLAN APPROVAL RENTON,WASHINGTON A Site Plan Application has been filed and accepted with the Developmnet Services Division of the City of Renton. The following briefly describes the application and the necessary Public Approvals. DESCRIPTION: Sartori-New Parking ECF;SA-070-90 The applicant proposes to convert a grassed play field of the former elementary school into a paved and landscaped 76 car parking lot. GENERAL LOCATION: 315 Garden Avenue North PUBLIC APPROVALS: Environmental Review Site Plan Approval The application can be reviewed in the Development Services Division located on the third floor of Renton City Hall. Comments will be accepted anytime prior to Public Hearings, during_Public_Hearings, or prior to an administrative site plan approval. For further information on the application or dates of final action by the City, please contact the Development Services Division,at 235-2550. N. 5th Sr. - - GRAPHIC SCALE 1" 1 200' \-\--\---71--- ❑ ❑ n ❑ o 100' zoo 300' El ❑ - El N SART04 HEALTH occuP�noNs ❑ /1- &APPRENTIOCC 14)F SR R - •d ❑- I � - _ DJ • I I :ICY 7Fu ENT(uor it. f� l RENTCI' — CI _ ` 26 — 1 0 P-I -1 A c etc:3...t.dvr.D f ❑ , DRIVEWAY / AllOW D ENT. ,a ElEl4 0 :CD ID El o 0 ❑ El LIN, v . ❑ ❑ O ❑ P-1 Z z z z . o ❑ z . o CO HT] ' < n II ❑ % g : CD ❑ 3 >- \ r� 1-1 % :0 o Ei ❑ L g :❑ ❑ 0 0 ❑ OD : El 1 1 ii ii it 'in N. 3rd ST. SINGLE FAMILY HOUSES n o D hi-► i0 rt n ilj l 1 'r Mil 0 OF RFC NOTICEZ NOTICE 99. Og4EO SEPt OF PENDING • SITE PLAN APPLICATI ® N DESCRIPTION : SARTORI - NEW PARKING ECF;SA-070-90 THE APPLICANT PROPOSES TO CONVERT A GRASSED PLAYFIELD OF THE FORMER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL INTO A PAVED AND LANDSCAPED 76 CAR PARKING LOT. GENERAL LOCATION AND/OR ADDRESS: 315 GARDEN AVENUE NORTH PUBLIC APPROVALS REQUIRED : ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW SITE PLAN APPROVAL PUBLIC COMMENTS, WILL BE RECEIVED BY THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT .ANYTIME PRIOR TO PUBLIC HEARINGS AND DURING PUBLIC HEARINGS. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CALL THE CITY OF RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT 235-2550 THIS NOTICE NOT TO BE REMOVED WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION CERTIFICATION I , M , ' HEREBY CERTIFY THAT .� COPIES OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENT WERE POSTED BY ME IN ,.3 CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON OR NEARBY THE DESCRIBED PROPERTY ON ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a ♦♦♦♦ PFiET J.p ���, Notary P bli, in and for the State of Washingt ♦ ••. G i i2 reside i n �' /LL/ ' ✓ on t h e � � Q�`��t�gSI G •.�! �i y � d • g ;� NOTARY II US ,• PUBLIC ;• 2 OF Rg :: oZ NOTICE 0,94 " EP,E�a`eb OF PENDING SITE PLAN APPLICATION DESCRIPTION : SARTORI - NEW PARKING ECF;SA-070-90. THE APPLICANT PROPOSES TO CONVERT A GRASSED PLAYFIELD OF THE FORMER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL INTO A PAVED AND LANDSCAPED 76 CAR PARKING LOT. GENERAL LOCATION AND/OR ADDRESS: 315 GARDEN AVENUE NORTH PUBLIC APPROVALS REQUIRED : ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW SITE PLAN APPROVAL PUBLIC COMMENTS WILL BE RECEIVED BY THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT .ANYTIME PRIOR TO PUBLIC HEARINGS AND DURING PUBLIC HEARINGS. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CALL THE CITY OF RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT 235-2550 THIS NOTICE NOT TO BE REMOVED WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF-070-90 APPLICATION NO(S).: SA-070-90 PROPONENT: Renton School District#403 PROJECT TITLE: SATORI SCHOOL BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: This project involves converting a grassed playfield of a former elementary school into a paved and landscaped 76 car parking lot to serve the increased parking needs caused by the schools present use as a vocational training school. LOCATION: 315 Garden Avenue North TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION X PLANNING DIVISION XCURRENT PLANNING LONG RANGE PLANNING PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P.M. ON July 18, 1990. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: e--2.fj'71el/li APPROVED , APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED il/e-e a,%7 ,? Ale{� DATE: SIGNATURE OF DIRE OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE RENTON .,JMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DE. ....3TMENT ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: DATE CIRCULATED: July 2, 1990 COMMENTS DUE: July 18, 1990 EFC-070-90 APPLICATION NO(S): SA-070-90 PROPONENT: Renton School District#403 PROJECT TITLE: SATORI SCHOOL BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: This project involves converting a grassed playfield of a former elementary school into a paved and landscaped 76 car parking lot to serve the increased parking needs caused by the school's present use as a vocational training school. LOCATION: 315 Garden Avenue North SITE AREA: 3.2 acres BUILDING AREA (gross): 33,640 sq.ft. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS: PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth 2. Air 3. Water 4. Plants 5. Animals 6. Energy& Natural Resources 7. Environmental Health 8. Land &Shoreline Use 9. Housing 10. Aesthetics 11. Light&Glare 12. Recreation 13. Historic&Cultural Preservation 14. Transportation • 15. Public Services 16. Utilities COMMENTS: We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. K /moo/moo Signature of Director or rized Representative Date RENTON , _IMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEI ITMENT ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: ' t- DATE CIRCULATED: July 2, 1990 COMMENTS DUE: July 18, 1990 EFC-070-90 APPLICATION NO(S): SA-070-90 PROPONENT: Renton School District#403 PROJECT TITLE: SATORI SCHOOL BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: This project involves converting a grassed playfield of a former elementary school into a paved and landscaped 76 car parking lot to serve the increased parking needs caused by the school's present use as a vocational training school. LOCATION: 315 Garden Avenue North SITE AREA: 3.2 acres BUILDING AREA (gross): 33,640 sq.ft. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS: PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth 2. Air 3. Water 4. Plants 5. Animals 6. Energy& Natural Resources 7. Environmental Health 8. Land &Shoreline Use 9. Housing 10. Aesthetics 11. Light&Glare 12. Recreation 13. Historic &Cultural Preservation 14. Transportation 15. Public Services 16. Utilities COMMENTS: -1)1J 5 v\5 ZOP21A fk-S Lot-5G AS 5 t"L At►a,.G6' b' ICeSSy-RA-1 �'°^"�5c.atN: (, ovt . We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. ' wSignature/11)-1-)Ltc,- irector or Authorized Representative Date RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF RENTOT`' ECF-070-90 APPLICATION NO(S).: SA-070-90 JUL a 3 1990 PROPONENT: Renton School District#403 riECEIVL PROJECT TITLE: SATORI SCHOOL BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: This project involves converting a grassed playfield of a former elementary school into a paved and landscaped 76 car parking lot to serve the increased parking needs caused by the schools present use as a vocational training school. LOCATION: 315 Garden Avenue North TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION CURRENT PLANNING LONG RANGE PLANNING PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P.M. ON July 18, 1990. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: L00 .4yz- �zl+wj APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED o►,�Lazul-sD cL9/ L-tAz C9 T rz,M Goss 6,, DPe-t) spAcE— R�Itimeh e,0 Pao, roz_ CA1- C-oM wwu vT`�i, 5u,-teoc_ tp.-) Dent 10 I R ., me) Qpc.Ls_ 5 i ems. xwcn e- evALocrep. I ) L11.w- o I-05S eV ePBU SrAtp Lam p `` �c-t r�et�s I� -�kl�?' cruise AOh(/' DATE: 7( /7o SIGNAT R OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE RENTON . 3MMUNITV DEVELOPMENT DEU„.3TMENT ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: C-- kc tc 4i ►^a�( DATE CIRCULATED: July 2, 1990 U COMMENTS DUE: July 18, 1990 EFC-070-90 APPLICATION NO(S): SA-070-90 PROPONENT: Renton School District#403 PROJECT TITLE: SATORI SCHOOL BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: This project involves converting a grassed playfield of a former elementary school into a paved and landscaped 76 car parking lot to serve the increased parking needs caused by the school's present use as a vocational training school. LOCATION: 315 Garden Avenue North SITE AREA: 3.2 acres BUILDING AREA (gross): 33,640 sq. ft. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS: PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth 2. Air 3. Water 4. Plants 5. Animals 6. Energy& Natural Resources 7. Environmental Health 8. Land & Shoreline Use 9. Housing 10. Aesthetics 11. Light&Glare 12. Recreation 13. Historic &Cultural Preservation 14. Transportation 15. Public Services 16. Utilities COMMENTS: We have reviewed this applic,tipn with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or yas where additio al information is needed to properly assess this proposal. /ignature of Diror or Authorized Representative: Date r RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF-070-90 APPLICATION NO(S).: SA-070-90 PROPONENT: Renton School District#403 PROJECT TITLE: SATORI SCHOOL BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: This project involves converting a grassed playfield of a former elementary school into a paved and landscaped 76 car parking lot to serve the increased parking needs caused by the schools present use as a vocational training school. LOCATION: 315 Garden Avenue North TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION CURRENT PLANNING LONG RANGE PLANNING PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P.M. ON July 18, 1990. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: Id1 APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED 100 DATE: 7 96 SIGNATUREp RECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE !/ RENTON K.vMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEP.,..TMENT ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: DATE CIRCULATED: July 2, 1990 COMMENTS DUE: July 18, 1990 EFC-070-90 APPLICATION NO(S): SA-070-90 PROPONENT: Renton School District#403 PROJECT TITLE: SATORI SCHOOL BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: This project involves converting a grassed playfield of a former elementary school into a paved and landscaped 76 car parking lot to serve the increased parking needs caused by the school's present use as a vocational training school. • LOCATION: 315 Garden Avenue North SITE AREA: 3.2 acres BUILDING AREA (gross): 33,640 sq. ft. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS: PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth 2. Air 3. Water 4. Plants 5. Animals 6. Energy& Natural Resources 7. Environmental Health 8. Land & Shoreline Use 9. Housing 10. Aesthetics 11. Light & Glare 12. Recreation 13. Historic & Cultural Preservation 14. Transportation 15. Public Services 16. Utilities COMMENTS: We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. S; I?7O Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Dat FIRETON FIRE DEPT PREVENTION BMW/ RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT JUL - igiJ DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET RECEIVED IVED ECF-070-90 APPLICATION NO(S).: SA-070-90 PROPONENT: Renton School District#403 PROJECT TITLE: SATORI SCHOOL BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: This project involves converting a grassed playfield of a former elementary school into a paved and landscaped 76 car parking lot to serve the increased parking needs caused by the schools present use as a vocational training school. LOCATION: 315 Garden Avenue North TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT • SCHEDULED ERC DATE: ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION.BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION CURRENT PLANNING LONG RANGE PLANNING PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P.M. ON July 18, 1990. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: fl(�'.. !/ APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED PC�OF BEING TONS JAL - G 1990 ED DATE: ����� S ( /pYe) SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE RENTON .,UMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEI 1TMENT ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: 1 at'+► 1e5 • DATE CIRCULATED: July 2, 1990 COMMENTS DUE: July 18, 1990 EFC-070-90 APPLICATION NO(S): SA-070-90 PROPONENT: Renton School District#403 PROJECT TITLE: SATORI SCHOOL BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: This project involves converting a grassed playfield of a former elementary school into a paved and landscaped 76 car parking lot to serve the increased parking needs caused by the school's present use as a vocational training school. LOCATION: 315 Garden Avenue North SITE AREA: 3.2 acres BUILDING AREA (gross): 33,640 sq. ft. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS: PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth 2. Air 3. Water 4. Plants 5. Animals 6. Energy& Natural Resources _ 7. Environmental Health 8. Land &Shoreline Use 9. Housing 10. Aesthetics 11. Light &Glare 12. Recreation 13. Historic&Cultural Preservation 14. Transportation 15. Public Services 16. Utilities COMMENTS: ?L We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of prob impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. /-gid2/ Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF-070-90 APPLICATION NO(S).: SA-070-90 PROPONENT: Renton School District#403 PROJECT TITLE: SATORI SCHOOL BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: This project involves converting a grassed playfield of a former elementary school into a paved and landscaped 76 car parking lot to serve the increased parking needs caused by the schools present use as a vocational training school. LOCATION: 315 Garden Avenue North TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT ' COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION CURRENT PLANNING LONG RANGE PLANNING ..*sr\ PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P.M. ON July 18, 1990. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: DcLv k5 APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED t/,t 4".'' E�=�d'`�' � .'��f��'�. �G•/��'{+�.-`r/�-=r r^- Fps%"3't+°`!`7'�'</1~`l'L���f=� 4� � C�v�'/ �-'� V �` "5 a irN�i t- J PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF RENTON JUL — 91990 NECEIVED DATE: 7-re- S NA URE OF DIRE TOR R AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE RENTOra OMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DE?MRTMENT ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: (L.XY DATE CIRCULATED: July 2, 1990 COMMENTS DUE: July 18, 1990 EFC-070-90 APPLICATION NO(S): SA-070-90 PROPONENT: Renton School District#403 PROJECT TITLE: SATORI SCHOOL BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: This project involves converting a grassed playfield of aiformer elementary school into a paved and landscaped 76 car parking lot to serve the increased parking needs caused by the school's present use as a vocational training school. LOCATION: 315 Garden Avenue North SITE AREA: 3.2 acres BUILDING AREA (gross): 33,640 sq.ft. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS: PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth 2. Air 3. Water 4. Plants 5. Animals 6. Energy&Natural Resources 7. Environmental Health 8. Land &Shoreline Use 9. Housing 10. Aesthetics 11. Light&Glare 12. Recreation 13. Historic&Cultural Preservation 14. Transportation 15. Public Services 16. Utilities COMMENTS: • We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. 7 —(7 -- 10 Signature of Director or Authorized Rep esentative Date ligerCer99k.4" . JUL j 1�90 ENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 0CI i r' OF R►.iv f ufV DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET PUBLIC WORKS CUSTOMER SERVICES ECF-070-90 APPLICATION NO(S).: SA-070-90 PROPONENT: Renton School District#403 PROJECT TITLE: SATORI SCHOOL BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: This project involves converting a grassed playfield of a former elementary school into a paved and landscaped 76 car parking lot to serve the increased parking needs caused by the schools present use as a vocational training school. LOCATION: 315 Garden Avenue North TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: X ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION CURRENT PLANNING • LONG RANGE PLANNING PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT x OTHERS: S7-0 R/Vl. wA I-6 7\ COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT k- DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P.M.ON July 18, 1990. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: S DAWN APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS X NOT APPROVED CD The drainage plans for this proposal shall comply with the core and special requirements contained in Section 1.2 and 1.3 of Chapter 1, the hydrologic analysis methods contained in Chapter 3, the hydraulic analysis and design methods contained in Chapter 4, and the erosion/sedimentation control plan and practices contained in Chapter 5 of the 1990 King County Surface Water .Design Manual. ase c/ry 0/4/lick/ STD.. /.Jt7 I' 5 -1 is 2$CC- CON%/do(- /,ecow /eriz'(croe Are- 4 r Re 9..,,l.Ed, 'CO OIL / wATC 0-00VArooC i.)-eecos i 0 X4vt 84c I-eF N N NG F DIVISION JUL 1 81990 Pee DATE: —/7- SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE /NC(\r) II RENTON ;MMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DE 1TMENT ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: DATE CIRCULATED: July 2, 1990 COMMENTS DUE: July 18, 1990 EFC-070-90 APPLICATION NO(S): SA-070-90 PROPONENT: Renton School District#403 PROJECT TITLE: SATORI SCHOOL BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: This project involves converting a grassed playfield of a former elementary school into a paved and landscaped 76 car parking lot to serve the increased parking needs caused by the school's present use as a vocational training school. LOCATION: 315 Garden Avenue North SITE AREA: 3.2 acres BUILDING AREA (gross): 33,640 sq.ft. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS: PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth 2. Air 3. Water 4. Plants 5. Animals 6. Energy& Natural Resources 7. Environmental Health 8. Land &Shoreline Use 9. Housing 10. Aesthetics 11. Light&Glare 12. Recreation 13. Historic& Cultural Preservation 14. Transportation 15. Public Services 16. Utilities COMMENTS: NO 10,4/-CT 7-t) 6 ( 5 TM/ b -F6A) 1-1` 5' (�.r� S vFrEN\ D T's /5 Z° v� �,�� �9-� . We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. / 7-- 70 Signature of Director or Authorized Represen ative Date ggellITIDENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT JUL 0 3 1990 DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET CITY OF RENT ON PUBLIC WORKS � " E FR-U 90VIGES APPLICATION NO(S).: SA-070-90 PROPONENT: Renton School District#403 PROJECT TITLE: SATORI SCHOOL BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: This project involves converting a grassed playfield of a former elementary school into a paved and landscaped 76 car parking lot to serve the increased parking needs caused by the schools present use as a vocational training school. LOCATION: 315 Garden Avenue North TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION CURRENT PLANNING LONG RANGE PLANNING PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: 5-6w� & COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P.M. ON July 18, 1990. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: e,v APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF RENTON JUL 1 8 1990 vED 0111 DATE: 7- /7 - 70 SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE job RENTON __MMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEI _ __ITMENT ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: -1—Vrd,ySS\ c:!)v46.410V\ DATE CIRCULATED: July 2, 1990 COMMENTS DUE: July 18, 1990 EFC-070-90 APPLICATION NO(S): SA-070-90 PROPONENT: Renton School District#403 PROJECT TITLE: SATORI SCHOOL BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: This project involves converting a grassed playfield of a former elementary school into a paved and landscaped 76 car parking lot to serve the increased parking needs caused by the school's present use as a vocational training school. LOCATION: 315 Garden Avenue North SITE AREA: 3.2 acres BUILDING AREA (gross): 33,640 sq. ft. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS: PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth 2. Air 3. Water 4. Plants 5. Animals 6. Energy& Natural Resources 7. Environmental Health 8. Land &Shoreline Use 9. Housing • 10. Aesthetics 11. Light &Glare 12. Recreation 13. Historic &Cultural Preservation 14. Transportation 15. Public Services 16. Utilities COMMENTS: 4-0 P^r' 1-D-r_ , 1l c-1 Cc./ E--7 A J d A4,14 -e / e7c, P1-•4/Y( le/ 1"-)7 f ;it-- f s `v 6 e ' C2 P1.-roP"4-1 ) /P We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those area which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Director or Authorized Representatiy s D e J is ' lag©IMIWIE TON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT JUL 0 3 1990 ci i Y OF REN'I'ON DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET: PUBLIC WORKS CUSTOMER SERVICES ECF-070-90 APPLICATION NO(S).: SA-670-90 PROPONENT: Renton School District#403 PROJECT TITLE: SATORI SCHOOL BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: This project involves converting a grassed playfield of a former elementary school into a paved and landscaped 76 car parking lot to serve the increased parking needs caused by the schools present use as a vocational training school. LOCATION: 315 Garden Avenue North TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION CURRENT PLANNING CITY OF RE.NION LONG RANGE PLANNING JUL 1 01990 PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT i11=L;LIVED OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P.M. ON July 18, 1990. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: c t-t. APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS ' NOT APPROVED f hoU' o , 1 'OG2+-1vk! E 421+. Issue ; D y s 17-.-- )?4t ,� -chi ey /6 24ix� h a l� ! �`c b`✓ ? A44 1:= /a 1 7 — or_ z,e) 4 c/ j / 4'1 „.-- t / �" - DATE: ./2,, SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZEO'REPRESENTATIV i' p I RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 1 DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET! i 1 ECF-070-90 APPLICATION NO(S).: SA-070-90 PROPONENT: Renton School District#403 PROJECT TITLE: SATORI SCHOOL I BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: This project involves converting a grassed playfield of a former elementary school into a paved and landscaped 76 car parking lot to serve the increased parking needs caused by the schools present use as a vocational training school. LOCATION: 315 Garden Avenue North TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: - I ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION CURRENT PLANNING LONG RANGE PLANNING PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P.M. ON July 18, 1990. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: pc 1 ice r APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED . PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF RENTON JUL 1 81990 axitAn-6 DATE: :71VED SIGNATURE OF DIRECTO ( R AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE . k RENTON __IMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DE ITMENT ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET, REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Po1m..-2. DATE CIRCULATED: July 2, 1990 COMMENTS DUE: July 18, 1990 EFC-070-90 APPLICATION NO(S): SA-070-90 PROPONENT: Renton School District#403 PROJECT TITLE: SATORI SCHOOL BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: This project involves converting a grassed playfield of a;former elementary school into a paved and landscaped 76 car parking lot to serve the increased parking needs caused by the school's present use as a vocational training school. LOCATION: 315 Garden Avenue North SITE AREA: 3.2 acres BUILDING AREA (gross): 33,640 sgll ft. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS: PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth 2. Air 3. Water 4. Plants 5. Animals 6. Energy& Natural Resources 7. Environmental Health 8. Land &Shoreline Use 9. Housing 10. Aesthetics 11. Light&Glare 12. Recreation 13. Historic&Cultural Preservation 14. Transportation 15. Public Services 16. Utilities i • COMMENTS: �/ ^An/ U Vv v We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this,proposal. gAA-AAN6 1-51UVa Signature of Director or Authorized-Representative Date 9 6 Jul 0 9 1990 RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT c►n OF RENTON DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET PUBLIC WORKS__ E . S CUSTOMS ECF-070-90 APPLICATION NO(S).: SA-070-90 PROPONENT: Renton School District#403 PROJECT TITLE: SATORI SCHOOL BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: This project involves converting a grassed playfield of a former elementary school into a paved and landscaped 76 car parking lot to serve the increased parking needs caused by the schools present use as a vocational training school. LOCATION: 315 Garden Avenue North TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION CURRENT PLANNING LONG RANGE PLANNING PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT W OTHERS: Pit. r/l., • COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P.M. ON July 18, 1990. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: Wo:4e ( APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS KNOT APPROVED C PLAN.. CapbbpIVISION JUL 1 81990 MATE. 7—I? 70. SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AU HORIZED REPRESENTATIVE • a. • RENTON IMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEI 1TMENT ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: DATE CIRCULATED: July 2, 1990 COMMENTS DUE: July 18, 1990 EFC-070-90 APPLICATION NO(S): SA-070-90 PROPONENT: Renton School District#403 PROJECT TITLE: SATORI SCHOOL BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: This project involves converting a grassed playfield of a former elementary school into a paved and landscaped 76 car parking lot to serve the increased parking needs caused by the school's present use as a vocational training school. LOCATION: 315 Garden Avenue North SITE AREA: 3.2 acres BUILDING AREA (gross): 33,640 sq.ft. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS: PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth 2. Air 3. Water 4. Plants 5. Animals 6. Energy& Natural Resources 7. Environmental Health 8. Land &Shoreline Use 9. Housing 10. Aesthetics 11. Light& Glare 12. Recreation 13. Historic& Cultural Preservation 14. Transportation 15. Public Services 16. Utilities COMMENTS: © sTAIVAGL ptiT. p /i,tia?6774 r 4/#04, 19 /3AcKFLov ' gtvfct (0,c, v . 0 2 Armme/f-r-cli<- o ,WOrvitee wAc c.c,,t i iwegt,L`ie 4 ' spowKi ZC) cry ��C�v��5 4- x, /9 4-r6 Jfw4 �6. o t 6 fox cAl viv i /6ATie y77', 0-1 S' 70 5,4v4. ��' G=wf±fe cII4 ,fp 605. ( p vc-l- �tT�`I /S ivy d-�c.Gavv�D / K 1E lv�r 0•v) ,� 5-ciel 17 u1T a r ieixrw IDS S ofiliv a, Tp v '2 - s`2f a vv1 /7 tl2 Ste, jelt OAK c ,r• c. coD�Gs. We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date DATE © CITY OF RENTON INVOICE ,� , ,��,�0 ACCOUNT INVOICE r�7co1 5 ;,, ; FINANCE DEPT. • 200 MILL AVE. S. • RENTON, WA 98055 C. DATE ACCOUNT INVOICE 'CUSTOMER REFERENCE PAYMENT DUE FOR INFORMATION CALL ( ACCOUNT NAME 06/ 27 / 90 070010 07/17/ 90 Policy Development - 235-2552 RENTON S _ - COL DISTRICT 4C' 3 PLAN CHECK _ES-S RTORI • CLMMUNITY CEVELIPMENT CEPT ri:pnton School District e403 1 :23 4th se 000 coo o0 345 of 00 37 Penton 98055 67 . 00 Pattn Maintenance 7e..t 00C 000 CO 3!•5 61 CC 11 3?5 .00 • 000 000 00 345 81 00 17 S20 . 00 DESCRIPTION AMOUNT 000 000 00 369' 90 00 1 ., Environmental Review; Fees o7 . 00 1 ;' .00 'trading Filling Fees 325 . 00 Site Plan Approval 520. 0O Postage ( : . 25 X 2 mt.ilincs ) 19 . 00 Total Amount Cue 1 , 231 .00 TOTAL INVOICE 1 , 231 .00 FILE COPY • - PLANNING & ZONING FEES NAME: }EI) *4 7 PROJECT: �C l :..:::.:::.::..:.::,::..:.:::...:::o:�:�t:«.;:::.::::;:><::;:;«:::;;Amo•u:nt.::;>;:::>::::; .Tr.,an.code;:. Annexation Fees 000/000/345.81.00.02 Appeals & Waivers 000/000/345.81.00.03 Binding Site Plan/Short Plat 000/000/345.81.00.04 Comprehensive Plan Amendment • 000/000/345.81.00.05 Conditional Use Fees 000/000/345.81 .00.06 Environmental Review Fees 000/000/345.81 .00.07 (p7, co Preliminary Plat 000/000/345.81 .00.08 50% Final Plat (General Fund) 000/000/345.81.00.09 ! t 50% Final Plat (Park Fund) 101/000/345.81.00.00 . . Final/Preliminary PUD 000/000/345.81 .00.10 • Grading & Filling Fees 000/000/345.81 .00.11 3. 5.OD Lot Line Adjustment • 000/000/345.81.00.12 Mobile Home Parks 000/000./345.81.00.13 Rezone 000/000/345.81.00.14 Routine Vegetation Mgmt Fees • 0.00/000/345.81.00.15 Shoreline Substantial Dev Fees 000/000/345.81.00.16 Site Plan Approval 000/000/345.81.00.17 �aD, 0-0 Special/Temporary Review Fees 000/000/345.81.00.18 Variance Fees 000/000/345.81 .00.19 Other Misc Planning/Zoning Fees 000/000/345.81.00.20 Maps 000/000/341 .50.00.00 7041 Photo Copies 000/000/341 .60.00.24 Publications 000/000/341.60.00.24 • Postage . ?Sq X 2 rrzvJ/rcf 000/000/369.90.00.18 1Q.0° '; 7055 Sales Tax 000/000/231.70.00.00 9998 • I ' BY: • DATE: �% _'-= CITY '4OF RENTON ' ' Public Works Department Earl Clymer, Mayor Lynn Guttmann,Director July 3, 1990 Mike Yuhl 12828 Northup Way, Suite 300 . Bellevue,WA 98005 Subject: Renton School District'#403, SATORI SCHOOL ECF;SA;SP-070-90 Dear Mr.Yuhl: The Planning Division of the City of Renton has formally accepted the above referenced application for preliminary review. It is tentatively scheduled for consideration by the Technical Advisory Committee on July 27, 1990. Within three days of that review, you will be notified in writing that: 1) your application is complete and has been scheduled for environmental review and determination, or 2) that additional information is required to continue processing your application for environmental review. Please contact me, at 235-2550, if you have any questions. Sincerely, • Mark R. Pywe ll, AICP Project Manager MRP/kac 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-263I } r 'ti : :': ; !!!..:i.!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!:.:.:!!:.::::',::'::::::.:':!:::::!:::::.!!!!!!:',',:',:.::::::::!::!:::::::,::!::.::::::!::::!:::.::::.:::::.::::::::.::!.''........:::',::::::::':::::::::::::::::::,::::::::::,::::i:'::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::':::::.:.1::.:::::.:7''''''',:'::i'::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::]':::::::‘:::::;:::::.:::::::::::::.:':::::::::.::::.::: ::: :: ::> ,:m.i:::<::>:::::::::<:::>:::::::: ::: .. .CO ITY.D L .P .. .. . .... .. . .... ....... . . ...... .. . . . .. 1'I•.UN . ....Q:: E�IT:D PA�2.'.�1 ':.:]:i• .•:: : :::...•::: .:•::::: :xf..� : ::..::.. A :T I ?.,:i :::>::;::::::::::::::::::::::: ::OWN:ER>: :: :>:: ::::::::>::::>::: :::::>:::>::: TYPE<:O.F:>AP:P:LI,CAT].O:N:::+ ::::F:E E.S:::::::::: .... .. .:::. ..::::. NAME: Renton School District #403 SPECIAL PERMIT I $ TEMPORARY PERMIT $ ADDRESS: 435 Main Avenue South •`CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT SITE PLAN APPROVAL $ 561a0 SPECIAL PERMIT -•• $ CITY: Renton ZIP: 98055 .. :',GRADE&FILL PERMIT $•(( .0O (NO.CU.YDS: I ) 'VARIANCE I $ • TELEPHONE NUMBER (FROM SECTION: ) "6' 235-2200 `WAIVER $ ROUTINE VEGETATION — I TACT.PERS.Q N::AP F LICA.NT:..;:: ; . MANAGEMENT PERMIT $ NAME:;- M.ke Y- • ('JUSTIFICATION REQUIRED) I ADDRESS: •12828 Northup Way Suite 300 SUBDIVISION: 1 $ _LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT $ cITY: Bellevue ZIP: 98005 _SHORT PLAT $ _TENTATIVE PLAT . $ _PRELIMINARY PLAT 1 $ TELEPHONE NUMBER 641-2886 —FINAL PLAT I- . $ NO.OF LOTS: • :: :: PLAT NAME: I • ROJECTI N Q....R...MATION ..:::.:... .. .... .... . . .. . ,........ .. :....:.... ::..:..;.:..:..:: . .: PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAME: PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: $ Sartori - New Parking _PRELIMINARY _FINAL PROPERTY/PROJECT ADDRESS(S)/LOCATION: I I 315 Garden Ave. North Renton 98055 _BINDING Sr!'bPLAN: $ . I KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER(S): 722400-0170-0 MOBILE HOME PARKS: ,j $ _TENTATIVE ' EXISTING LAND USE(S): _PRELIMINARY School —FINAL PARK NAME: EXISTING ZONING: NO.OF SPACES:_ _ P-1 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW $ WI.Op PROPOSED LAND USE(S): PROJECT VALUE: $ 7p,000 ' School SENSITIVE AREA: `f APA: 412 _OTHER —N/A SEWER MORATORIUM AREA: YES dIra PROPOSED ZONING: P-1 I • • • • • A FF A • • I, • Rick Stracke , being duly sworn, declare that I am (please check one) X the authorized representative to act for the property owner,_ the owner of the property involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. SUBSCRIBED A SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS tat DAY OF 19 fo NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR THE STATE OF WASHINGTON,RESIDING AT: 44 7/3U (91,1&/, 72e,e,ie,L .„/ (Name of,N tar Public) Signature o Owner) 435 Main Ave. So. 1220 No. 4th St. (Address)' (Address) Renton, WA 98055 Renton, WA 98055 (City/State/Zip) (City/State/Zip) ( 206 ) 235-2340 ( 206 ) ' 235-2326 (Telephone) (Telephone) Acceptance of this application and required filing fee does not constitute a complete application. Plans and other material required to constitute a complete application are listed in the"Application Procedure." RtnMastr 2/90 • YU H L & (206) 641-2886 ASSOCIATES 12828 NORTHUP WAY BELLEVUE, WA 98005 June 15, 1990 PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF RE, ON City of Renton JUN 2 61990 200 Mill South � � � rm Renton, WA 98055 , E Dear sirs: 1. Attached are'two applications for Site Plan approval for Renton School District. At the RVTI Main Campus, the District is planning to add 24 new parking places between a driveway and the building. At Sartori, the District is planning to add 76 new on-site parking places. These parking places are to handle the District's present program needs. 2. Our calculation of the fees are as follows: On RVTI @ 4000 N.E. 4th, the value of the new parking places is under $10,000 so the fee is $ 75 The site plan approval fee based on a site less than 1 acre. 820 Postage costs are 27 On Sartori, the estimated value of the new parking lot for fee purposes is $70,000. 67 Grading Permit 325 The site of the parking area is 0.9 acres and therefore the site plan approval fee is 820 Postage costs are 19 $2,153 3. Please note that these plans shown additional work going on at the school that is not covered in the application. This work is normal pavement restoration work that the District routinely accomplishes during the summer. The District believes no permit is required for the work which will occur during this summer. The work covered under the permits is for parking in new areas. The new impervious surface at RVTI is under 3000 sq. ft. and therefore we understand no retention is required. Storm water retention is provided at Sartori, not only for the new work as required by Rentori's Regulations, bul we have retrofitted to provide retention for the existing paved areas where none existed before. Four copies of the drainage calculations are attached as requested. 4. Driveway - Please note that at RVTI we are proposing to remove the hump in the present main'access driveway as our experience has been that this is creating a use problem as longer vehicles bottom out. Sincerely yours, q7/1)--L- Michael H. uhl, P.E. • Enclosures as Listed MHY:c EGA- — 070 — `1O Sf�- CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL -CHECKLIST I Purpose of Checklist: The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), Chapter 43.21C RCW, requires; all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probably significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. Instructions for Applicants: This environmental checklist ask you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the,questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can'. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply". Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, 1 the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impacts. Use of Checklist for Nonnroiect Proposals: (Please Type or Print Legibly) Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may Ibe answered "does not apply". IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D). For nonproject actions (actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs), the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Sartor% - New Rarktng & Pavement Repairs 2. Name of applicant: Renton School Dtstri"ct #403 43. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: en R Main Ave. South Renton, WA 98055 4. Date checklist prepared: Apri,1 25, 1990 Attn;: Rick Stracke 235-2326 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Renton PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF RENTON JUN 2 6 igpq -2- 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Start after June 8, 1990 Complete by October 1, 1990 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansions, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. No 8. List any environmental Information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. None 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. No 10. List any governmental approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. City of Renton Building Permit 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. Convert a 148 ft. x 275 ft. lawn into a 76 space parking area and repair surface of existing 80 space parking area plus storage areas. . 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range if .known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topography map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plan required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. Between Garden & Park Avenue North South of N.• 4th St. in the NW 4 of Section 17, Township 23 North, Range 5 East W.M. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site (circle one);4010 rolling, hilly, steep, slopes mountainous, other 1 b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope?) 2% c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, scaly, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? if you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. Sandy Loam d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. No • -3- e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. Remove ± 650 cu. yds. unsuited soil and import apprdx. 425 cu. yds. of crushed rock top course. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction,1 or use? If so, generally describe. Yes, however the small areas and flat slopes make significant erosion unlikely. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? Project area unknown. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: Follow City erosion control procedures. 2. AIR a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Minimal dust and the usual construction equipment emissions will occur during construction. b. Are there any off-site sources of emission? No c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: Schedule work activities to minimize dust. 3. WATER a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes,; ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. No 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (wi!thin 200 feet) the • described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available 'plans. No 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. None 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities If known. No 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. No - 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials Ito surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. None -4- b. Ground: • 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, If any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. None c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters, If so, describe. Varying quantities of storm water will be intercepted by new and existing pavement and channeled to existing catch. basins. Water will then flow in existing drains to the Cedar River and Lake Washington. 2) ould waste material enter group or surface waters? If so, generally describe. Not likely d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: Provide storm water control system. 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other X evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other shrubs X grass crop or grain wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants: water lily, eel grass, milfoil, other other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Grass will be removed c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measure to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: Add trees, shrubs and ground cover in accordance with approved Landscaping Plan. 5.. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: Birds: hawk, heron, eagle, ongbirds other Mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other Fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other -s- b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain No d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: None 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, wood, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. None b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: None 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. Not likely 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. None likely 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: Follow existing requirement and usual construction practices. b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the areas which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? None 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? ,Indicate what hours noise would comefrom the site. Usual construction equipment noise wil occur during normal work hours. Usual car noises would come from the proposal - usually during school hours. • • 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: None 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Vocation School . School bus & maintenance facility North; residences East, South and some on West. Store on West. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. No -6- c. Describe any structures on the site. School buildings d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? A 12' x 32' wood frame building will be removed. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? P-1 f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? P-1 g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Does not apply. h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. No i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? None - project would provide additional on-site parking for present, users. j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: I. Proposed measures to ensure the p proposal is compatible with existing an projected land uses and plans, if any: None 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. None b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: None 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed. • 0 as the proposal is a parking lot. b. What views in'the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: Add landscaping. 11. Light and Glare -7- a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? None b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: None 12. Recreation a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? Lawn is used by neighbors for walking. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No - as parking lot will still be available for walking. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: None • 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. No b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural Importance known to be on or next to the site. No c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: None ,r. -8- • 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. Existing one lane driveway to Park Ave. would remain. One lane driveway to N. 4th would be widened to two lanes. b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? No c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? 156 on site, d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private? No e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. No f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. None, as the proposal is to better serve the existing uses by adding to on- g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: site parking. None 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. Not likely b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. None 16. Utilities a. Cir utilities c rrently available at the site: electricity, natural gas water, efuse servic elephone sanitary sewer septic system, other. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Some water from existing building would be used for irrigation. -9- C. SIGNATURE Pin`'"'•0-4 N I, the undersigned, state that to he best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Renton School District #403 Proponent: Yuhl & Associates by Name Printed: Michael H. Yuhl • • • ATTACHMENT A To Application for City of Renton Site Plan Approval Lots 1 - 10 of Block 3 of the Plat of Sartorisville as recorded. in Volume 8, page 7 of Records of King County. • I ' i WELLS AVE. N. . /PELLY AVE. N. = [1 ❑ ❑ ❑❑ ❑ ❑ p_ ❑ El ❑ � ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ' I ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑D ri ' DODD 0 = 0 OD OH I p 00000 CS - J--1 El 0 E PARK AVE. N. ❑❑ ❑ ❑❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑❑ ❑ STORE ❑ ❑ 22r ❑ ❑ JI Z ❑ _ .r ❑ ' ❑ p C] z - I 1 c • I 1 1 42 m I ^- _ ❑ .\ �\ ii �R MAINTENANCE ENTON CYARDT ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑n ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ t _ IS GARDEN AVE. N. n Ij ' r� Il n r1 Il \r M i. �r. ❑ ❑ p D ❑❑ ❑❑ ° U ❑ ❑ ❑ 1 ❑ ❑ ❑ r'�b C7 m R_ ' -n 3v)--- -- -- _ ,.-..""L _ _2 _ __ __i] p ❑ ❑ ❑❑ ❑❑ 3 ]❑ ❑ ❑ ❑❑o ❑ 00000 F18% - s =o MEADOW AVE. N. I II C5 cn m O V $_ O D, V d a (n rn WWg Z R FACTORY AVE. N. \ . 1 I I I \ _J Z /\ N . - \ / \ I I I ( 1 1 i_ 1--- PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF RENTON JUN 2 6 1990 PROJECT NARRATIVE , VE 4' Application for Site Plan Approval Applicant: Renton School District #403 Project: Sartori School This project involves converting a grassed playfield of a former elementary school into a paved and landscaped 76 car parking lot to serve the increased parking needs caused by the school's present use as a vocational training school. This work is intended to be used by the students instead of the extensive amount of street parking now used. PLANNING DiVISION CITY OF RENTON SARTORI - Statement in Response to Question 10 • JUN 2 61990 Estimate Quantities and types of material involved: t V El 650 cu. yds. of existing topsoil will be removed from site. • 435 cu. yds. of gravel base will be imported. The hours will be between 7 a.m. and 6 p.m. Monday through Friday. The time of completion is estimated to be 60 days after a permit is issued, weather permitting. There is no phasing. The material will be hauled in along North 4th Street. Other routes are unknown as it depends upon the contractor's source of material. Minimizing of impacts of mud would be achieved by following usual erosion control procedures. Dust would be minimized by wetting or modification of equipment procedures. Noise could not be minimized as the construction will require the use of ordinarily muffled construction equipment. • • • • 1 • PROJECT:Sartori Parki r y: DATE: General Drainage Requirements Containing Design Engineer's Brief Response A. Datum&Benchmark given. City of Renton #1238 on Park Ave. B. Is site within aquifer protection area? Probably Not C. Vicinity map? Yes D. Drawing Size 22 x"34" Printed on 24"x36" Paper��,�� E. Has onsite inspection been made? 34 F. Check environmental review comments for requirements 066L 9 Z Nnr G. North Arrow Upper Left H. Scale(1" = 20',40'),Vertical/Horizontal scales shown 1"=20' I. Property Line On drawing Ns NSEI z10 ONINNVld J. Adjacent street name North 4th & Garden K. Legend None used - features are labeled L. City of Renton Storm Drainage Plan Notes On Drawing #4 II. Layout of Storm Drainage System A. Diversion of flow is not allowed unless the diverted flow would reach the same point in near downstream and the diversion of flow would not cause significant impact. No B. Runoff collected from pavement and gravel surface serving vehicle access/parking must flow thru oil/water separator CB or adequate bio-filtration system.Baffled oil/water separator required on parking lots. If site has more than 1 acre of paved surface subject to vehicular traffic or discharges within 1/4 mile of a stream,open pond or open drainage ditch bio-filtration is required. The water sheets from the parking are to landscaping. C. CB/MH: 1. Label CB/MH in sequential number. 2. Label grate elevation,pipe invert elevation,CB/MH type and size. 3. Label flow restrictor,invert and overflow elevations,oil/water separator,and note with solid locking lid. We are using existing basin with oil separator by adding 4. CB TypeII outflow control so 0-W operates properly. a If pipe invert is more than 5'deep from CB grate,type II CB(will be required. b. For a CB Type II pipes over 18"in diamater must have locking lid. Not applicable 5. In City Right-of-way CB is required in every 150'of surface sheet flow for grade < 1%,200' for grade < 3%,and 300'for grade >=3%. Not appl i cabl e 6. In private property CB is required in every 200'of surface sheet flow for grade < 3%,and 300'for grade>= 3%, Existing 250 ft. max. sheet flow to remain. • 7. Vane grates needed on slopes greater than 8%. N/A 8. Min. 1%grade towards CB in parking lot. 1% i n new. .6 % in existing. 9. Show spot elevations at corners of parking lot if finished contours are not shown and flow direction arrows. Done 10. Flow collected by pipe from open channel must enter a CB/MH Type II with sump within 50' of pipe inlet. Enters existing CB with sump. 11. Max'rae size: (Per King County,WSDOT Stds) Concrete CMP Curb Inlet 12" 12" Type 1 CB 12" 15" Type 1L CB 18" ij 24" T�yy�pe 2-48" 24" 30" Type 2-54" 30" 36" Type 2-60" 36" 42" Type 2-(72" 48" 54" Type 2-96" 72" 72" 12. -Thru curb inlet required: a.At bottom of cul-de-sac. b.Thru vertical sags-2 CB's required so as to not cause flooding. D. Pipes: 1. Label pipe length,size,material and slope.(see 1988 WSDOT manual 7-04.2) Done a Concrete Pipe b. Reinforced Concrete c. Iron/Steel/Aluminum CMP d. Steel/Aluminum Spiral Rib Pipe e. Type N-12 HDPP(for pipes 12"to 24"only) f. ADS(in steep slope only) 2. All steel pipes to be galvanized and asphalt treatment 1 or better. 3. Indicate flow along pipe with arrow. 4. Max. continuous pipe length is 300'. 5. Min.pipe size is 12". 8"pipe is allowed only from curb inlet to CB/MH with a max.length of 66'and min.2%slope or on-site system in initial run of pipe only. 6. Downsizing of culvert within a closed system is allowed only if: a: downsized by 3"only,and Used 5 ft. of 6" into existing basin as b. Culvert diameter > 18",and outlet pipe is 6". • c. Culvert length> 100'. 7. Pipe must be min.5'from property line,and min.10'from any structure. OK 8. Pipe cover must meet the following requirements:30"minimum cover on PVC pipe and 2'on other types. Some special consideration can go to 1'cover if not designable any other way(a waiver is required from SWU). Have 1.9' cover - not enough fall in old Renton 9. Check for any conflict of storm pipe with other utilities.(Possible conflicts should be drains. detailed.) Done 10. A stubout to upstream property is required for tie-in for future development. On roadways storm improvements must be extended in street to the upstream property line. N/A 11. Trash rack/debris barrier is required at inlet of pipe >=18". provided 12. Drainage easement required for pipes serving upstream private pioperty:15'wide easement for pipe <=60",and diameter +10'for pipe>60".Pipes cannot split property line. N/A 13. A pipe anchor is required at every 20'if slope >10%for concrete pipe,and if slope >20%for CMP.(Provide detail per fig.43.4 J,page 4-38,King County Su4ace Water Design Manual, 1989) N/A 14. HDPP(High Density Polyethylene Pipe)is required if design flow velocity>30 fps,or if slope >30%for CMP and slope >20%for concrete. HDPP above grognd is required within native growth protection easement. HDPP underground is allowed if not in native growth protection easement. N/A 15. Pipe headwall required if there is erosion potential around inlet or outlet of culvert. N/A 16. Rock protection is required at outfall. Energy dissipator will be required if outfall velocity >12 fps.,per Renton Storm Water Utility Specifications. N/A 17. Roc - ain must be 4"min.and connected to CB/11...: N/A 18. Plan&profile shown on plans with other utilities noted. Only addi ng a culvert. E. Open Channels: 1. Label ditch lining(grass,or rock). Also label depth and side slope unless cross-section is shown. Done 2. Bank of channel must be min.15'from any structure. OK 3. If design flow> 10 cfs: a. 15'drainage easement is required at one side of channel if channel width <=30'. N/A b. 15'drainage easement is required at both sides of channel if channel width >30'. 4. 30'wide Flood Control Maintenance.Easement is required from the top of river bank. N/A 5. Channel at point of discharge from storm pipe with slope >=15%must be rocklined for min. N/A 10'from point of discharge,with width>= pipe diameter +3'. 6. Relocation of existing swale requires comments from Dept.of Fish and Game and approval N/A from SEPA. 7. Piping of existing swale not allowed. N/A 8. Bridge clearance min.1'above 100 year flood elevation. N/A 9. Floor elevation of proposed building must be min.1'above 100 year flood elevation. N/A F. Detention/Retention System: 1. Detention/retention can be waived if: Not applied for a. Runoff is directly discharged into the following water bodies:Lake Washington and Cedar River,or P-1 Channel. b. Single family residential building site has <3,000 square feet of impervious surface. c. A master drainage plan provides offsite detention. 2. Detention/retention system must have an emergency overflow system capable of releasing design flow. North along new and an access driveway 3. Detention should be contained in an easement if joint use is proposed. N/A 4. Min. 14'wide,paved or gravelled depending on slope,access noti to exceed 15%slope shall be provided to detention pond not abutting public right-of-way. A vehicular access road shall be provided to the bottom of pond if bottom width >=20'. N/A 5. A 3'high fence is required if pond side slope is steeper than 3H:1V or dead storage >6".A 5' high fence is required if dead storage >2'. Dead storage = 6" 6. Parking lot ponding as detention: a. Allowed on pavement only,not on gravel surface. b. Allowed outside the parking stalls only,in lightly used areas only. c. Max.6"deep. N/A Used swal es d. Inlet CB must have a 2'sump. 7. Detention Pipe Check 2"Air Vent and for any detention pipe a 200'max spacing between N/A CB's. 8. Planning Dept.approval for Pond Storage in greenbelts.Approval from Planning Dept. required for pond storage in greenbelts,per City Code 4-745. N/A • 9. Infil _.��n Trench/gravel trench flow spreader:(or ;-Jowed under special circumstances with prior approval from SWU) N/A : a Flow must go thru an type II CB with oil/water separator,and then a type I-L CB with gravel filter,and then a type I CB prior to entering infiltration trench. Not allowed N/A without drainage release from downstream property owner. b. Min.5'from structure and property line. N/A c. Perforated pipe must be min.10'from structure. N/A d. Min.30'setback from Septic Drainfield upslope,and 10'setback from Septic Drainfield downslope. N/A e. Must not be under pavement,or type 1 or 2 landscape. N/A f. Check overflow pattern and downstream impact.Need drainage release from downstream ' property owners to approve such method. N/A 10. Wetland: N/A a Boundary. b. Building Setback Line: 15'from Native Growth Protection E ement. c. Native Growth Protection Easement and Building Setback Line for unrate wetland will be determined by wetland specialist. , 11. Easements:drainage easement,native growth protection easement,access easement,slope easement,construction easement,etc. ' N/A 12. Building Setback Line. N/A 13. Existing and proposed topography over entire site and min.30 ft.outside boundary. See 'p1 an. 14. Existing features of the site:storm drainage system,wells,structures,fences,etc. See p1 an. 15. An overall storm drainage system plan:required if there are more than two plan sheets. N/A 16. Profile of storm drainage system N/A 17. Easement is required if street drainage is diverted across site or regional line crosses site. N/A 18. Give name,tax lot#,or plat&lot number on all adjacent properties. Shown III. STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEM DETAILS A. Detention/Retention Pipe/Vault: Adding detention to an existing O-W separator 1. Vertical view of control structure:,must comply with 1989 City of Renton Standards Sheet 3.4.2 and Sept.1985 SWM Bulletin. 2. Plan view of control structure:must comply with 1989 City of Renton Standards Sheet 3.4.2 and Sept.1985 SWM Bulletin. 3. Elbow of control structure:must comply with 1989 City of Renton Standards Sheet 3.4.2. a. Orifice to be sharp-edged. OK b. Orifice to be shop-drilled. OK • 4. Riser:reference to page 7-71 in Surface Water Design Manual Draft. Riser is not allowed in, right-of-way. OK 5. Vertical and plan view of detention vault/tank/pond: a Detention pipe must comply with City of Renton Standard details. b. Detention Vault must comply with City of Renton Standard details. c. Design volume in pipe should be achieved at overflow elevation: 6. Plan and vertical view of gravel filtering CB. • 7. Cra: ction of infiltration trench:(only upon prior- : >roval) N/A a. min.6"perforated pipe. b. 3/8"to 1-1/2"washed gravel • c. min.1'native soil cover d. min.8"from perc.pipe invert to trench bottom e. min.2'trench depth f. min.2'trench width g. Mirafi 140 or equal cloth is required around trench h. Show root barrier if necessary B. Conveyance System: • • 1. Cross-section of ditch/swale:Max.3:1 side slope for grass swale,and max.2:1 side slope for rock ditch.(velocity> 2.0 fps) Shown 2. Debris barrier:must comply with Fig.8 in page 52 of Storm Drainage Control Requirements and Guidelines,King County 1979. Shown 3. Pipe anchor N/A • 4. Culvert headwall N/A 5. Energy dissipater N/A 6. For offsite roads or road improvements,curb inlets or CB's required at low spots on road. 7. 1/4 mile downstream analysis. C. Others: 1. Cross-section of gravel trench flow spreader:similar to infiltration trench except no native soil cover. N/A 2. Vertical view of oil/water separator:must comply with KCRS 1987 drawing no.52. 3. Plan view of oil/water separator N/A 4. Baffled oil/water separator(per City standards) Used ex.i sti ng O-W separator box and added a new control D. Detention Pond 1. Detail 2. Have pond dimensions been given to verify storage capacity? Yes, see plan. 3. Flood routing,stage storage,TR-20,HEC-1 or equal. 4. As-built information by Licensed Professional Surveyor required before construction is completed. Don't you mean accepted? 5. Overflow spillway designed for 100 year system. 6. Positive drainage(min 0.5 slope)along bottom. No - This confl i cts with need to hol d 7. Is there a backwater analysis(HEC-1)run of the system? Water for f i l trati on & infiltration E. Grass Lined Swales Yes ' IV.GRADING PLAN DETAIL A. Existing features: 1. Topography over entire site and min.30'outside property. Took spot elevations 'on City 2. All storm drainage features:CB/MH,storm pipes,detention/retention systems,swales, ; wa l k s. lakes,wetlands,etc. Yes 3. Utilities Yes - 4. Structures .Yes 5. Fences Yes 6. Easements None known S 7. Public and private roads.' Shown V.TEMPORARY EROSION/SEDIMENTATION CONTROL PLAN A. Standard City of Renton Erosion Control Notes Shown B. Layout of TESCP: • 1. Existing and proposed topography See spot elevations 2. Clearing Limit All • 3. Rock construction entrance None as neighbors use school driveways 4. Filter fence Shown 5. Intercepting ditch rock check dam required every 50'if slope >10%,every 100'if slope is between 5%and 10%,every 150'if slope <5%. None provided. Area is flat. 6. Temporary pond:Is pond baffle necessary? No 7. Interim CB sedimentation protection C. Details: 1. Temporary pond:fencing required if dead storage >6". N/A 2. Temporary ditch with rock check dam:Max.2:1 side slope N/A 3. Filter fence Around CB 4. Rock construction entrance None provided as existing asphalt driveway is 5. Interim CB sedimentation protection Shown ±100 ft. long D. TESCP notes VI.STORM DRAINAGE REPORT A. Stamped and signed by a Washington P.E.on front page Yes B. Project overview: 1. Describe construction involved Done 2. Describe offsite upstream flow None 3. Describe existing onsite drainage features Yes 4. Specify Detention/retention and conveyance system design criteria: 10 year design is acceptable if drainage area < 50 acre and Q< 20 cfs. 25 year design is required for drainage area >= 50acre,orQ>= 20cfs. 25 yr. , ++ 5. Groundwater observation None C. Detention/retention,System design: Overkill on 0.9 ac, isn't it? . 1. SCS,SBUH,or equivalent method is required. 2. Upstream offsite flow must bypass the detention if offsite design Q >= 50%of existing onsite design Q. If offsite flow will enter the detention system,the detention storage and orifice shall be designed for the flow from the tributary area including onsite area and offsite area. None 3. If right-of-way improvement is involved,there are 3 possible options: N/A a. Install separate detention system in right-of-way to detailflow from right-of-way. b. Have flow from right-of-way bypass the onsite detention system but restrict the outflow from the onsite detention system to compensate for the increase in peak flow from right- of-way. c. Detain both onsite flow and flow from right-of-way in the onsite detention system. 4. a.Stand pipe and outlet pipe from detention system must be able to carry a flowrate equal to the design inflow to the detention system. Flow velocity in the detention system outlet pipe at the allowable outflow must be min.3 fps. b.If velocity is significantly lower than 3 fps,a pipe with a lower Mannings"n"is recommended. 5. Closed Depression:must have a min.storage equivalent to runoff volume of 25 year-24 hour storm(with outlet),and 100 year-24 hour storm(without outlet)per Storm Drainage Control Requirements and Guidelines,King County 1979. None 6. Infiltration Trench: None a. Only bottom area and 30%of side wall can be used to calculate infiltration rate. b. Max.30%of trench volume can be assumed as void and used as storage. • c. A soil log(min.6')is required to provide: 1. Soil type. 2. Percolation test: a Date taken b. Location of test taken c. Must be taken at a depth at least 1'below elevation of proposed trench bottom. d. Percolation test result must be as fast as 15 min./inch. e. Must be performed by qualified sanitarian or licensed Civil Engineer. 3. Search for groundwater level down to at least 1'below bottom of proposed trench. a Use constant flow formula to calculate storage required. D. Conveyance System Design: 1. Pipe: , a Check topographic map showing drainage tributary area to each CB.Area in acre should be labeled in each tributary area b. Check flow capacity of pipe vs.design runoff. c. Min.3 fps at design flow in. d. Max.30 fps in concrete pipe. e. Culvert may be designed to carry design flow with a headwater depth:(charts 3-5,pg 27- 29,Storm Water Drainage Control Requirements and Guidelines,King County,1979) 1. HD <= 2*diameter,for dia. <= 18". 2. HD <= 1.5*diameter,for dia > 18". 3. Check HW DN/D 4. On HW/Dn = H,Qa>o f. For 8"pipe,CMP allowed if slope > 2%. 2. Open Channel: None used a Check flow capacity of ditch against design runoff. b. Min.freeboard 6"for design flow <= 10 cfs,and 12"for design flow > 10 cfs. c. min.2 fps at design flow. d. Grass swale is acceptable if velocity< 5 fps. e. In King County right-of-way. Grass swale is acceptable for grade <= 6%. Rock ditch is acceptable for grade <=9%. Rock rip rap required if design velocity> 8 fps. E..1/4 mile Downstream Analysis: None provided as we also provided retention for the existing runoff. 1. Identify on a map the downstream drainage system. 2. Describe in narrative the make-up and general condition of the system. 3. Provide such data as conveyance system dimensions,'slopes,etc. 4. Check flow capacity of downstream drainage system against design flow. 5. Address such problems as flooding,capacity,overtopping,scouring,sloughing,erosion or sedimentation,and any water quality problems or concerns. 6. Report the findings of existing and potential downstream problems obtained from field trip observation,City of Renton Storm Water Utility,,and neighbors of the site. • F. Temporary Erosion/Sedimentation Control Plan: Determine the temporary pond size required with any one of the following methods: 1. OS-acre/acre of site. 2. KCCD nomograph method. G. Offsite Improvements: 1. Extend storm drainage to property line boundary. 2. Calcs need to support the sizing for future connections,using a 25-year design storm. H.Area,C undev,C dev,TC,CN,and 5 for 1. Offsite (Ao) 2. Onsite(Ar) 3. Bypass(Ab) w/s/g/002/bh • Page 1 PROJECT: RENTON SCHOOL DISTRICT-ADD ADDITIONAL PARKING AT SARTORI ENGINEERING ANALYSIS Existing Conditions: The proposed work is to convert an unused playground of a former elementary school to provide additional on-site parking, as the school is used as a vocational training school and students drive. At present, many park on the street. The present parking lot drains to two catch basins in the paved areas. (These basins also receive water from the roof drains. These basins have concrete pipe tees that are the old style oil water separators. These basins drain to a school district basin near Park Avenue, which in turn drains to the City system. There is no storm water runoff control from this area. This new parking lot will have landscaped areas around it. We will excavate these landscaped areas to specific elevations and use these for storm water detention and bio- filtration purposes. We will provide retention for the new and existing paved areas and provide for bio-filtration on the new areas. We have designed for retention to the 100 year storm flow for all of the existing and new impervious areas. (This is done because the area is available to provide retention.) Note that the new parking area is sloped North so the water will run into the swale near 4th Street and then.flow South in the swale. This was done to provide the maximum distance of swale that was available for bio-filtration purposes. We have overexcavated two of these swale areas on the West side. This is done to increase the channel area and thus decrease flow-through times and thus increase sedimentation and infiltration effectiveness. Estimation of 25 year runoff in the existing condition from the area of the,new parking lot - use rational method: Existing area is now a lawn with sidewalks on North and East which drain to street. Building and parking area south and driveway to the West are drainage ridges._,'Lawn,in SE also drains to this catch basin but this condition will not be affected by this,work. ' - - Most remote point would be N.E. corner which is at Elev. 32.45. This area would drain South to catch basin at 31.89. Distance = 132 ft. Average Slope = 0.42%. Interpolating from KC Chart for Overland Flow below 0.5% slope, given for "Short Grass , • Pasture & Lawns: yields an overland flow velocity of 0.44 ft./sec.. Overland Flow Time = 132 ft./0.44 ft./sec = 311 sec. = 5.2 min. Page 2 Flow in 188 ft. of pipe which has an average slope of 0.29%. V full = 1.7 ft./sec. V 1/2 full = 0.85 ft./sec. Use 0.9 ft/sec for 188 ft. Flow Time = 3.5 min. Initial time of concentration 10 min. Total Time of concentration 18.7 min. in existing condition Intensity of a 25 year 18.7 min. Renton rainfall = 1.4 in./hr. The area to be taken by the new paved surfaces is 25,411 sq. ft. = 0.58 acres. Q = c i A = 0(0.20)(1.4"/hr)(0.58) 0.163 cfs This is the 25 year peak runoff in the existing conditions. Qo = Allowable outflow/acreage x Future C = 0.163 cfs/0.58 acre x 0.9 = 0.313 cfs/acre impervious. Peak Storage Time T = -25 + 1/2138/QO = -25 + V2138/0.313 = 57.7 sec. Vs 25 yr. = 3420T/T+25 - 40 QoT = (3420)(57.7)/57.7+25 - (40)(0.313)(57.7) = 2386-722 = 1663 cu. ft./ac. impervious V total = (Vs)(Area)(Future C) = 1663 x 0.58 x 0.9 = 869 cu. ft. volume of storage required for new parking area Calculate Volume of Storage Available however is 4081 cu. ft. We purposely set out to provide more storage than would be required for this new facility as the large volume would be useful to provide retention for the existing parking area and building roof where retention is not now provided. The next question to answer would be what assumptions should be made to calculate orifice size? This is a straightforward calculation, if only the new area was considered because the runoff from the existing grassed playground is the existing condition. The proposed drainage system, however, controls the combined runoff from the new and the existing parking area. The allowable runoff, therefore, would be that which exists from the grassed area plus the existing pavement. If we make the orifice that size, however, the additional 4081 minus 869 cu. ft. of storage would only be used beyond the 25 year storm. What we want to do is use this storage • Page 3 area for storm water storage to the maximum extent practicable. The first fact we observe is that the existing impervious surface on this site is about 1.6 acres or about 2.7 times the new area. The provide storage, however, is 3.7 times the required storage for the new area. This means that if I go back and lassume the entire 3.21 acre site is grass that I'd still have more storage than I need. What I will do is force more storage to occur by undersizing the orifice. To do this, as a first trial, I will size the orifice for just the outflow from the existing grassed area of the site. Orifice Area = Q allowed/0.62 2gh 0.163/0.062 * (2)(32.2)(284) = 0.0194 sf = 2.78 sq. in. d = 4A = 1/(4) (2.78)4 = 1.89 in, say 1-3/4 inches. A At this discharge rate (which is 75 gpm), the velocity in the existing 8" outfall is 0.5 ft./sec. This means that this pipe would never achieve a scour velocity which means that sediment and, hopefully the oils from the paved surfaces wouldn't be flushed out of the basins and downstream into the City system. A 24 hour hyetograph was developed for the 100 year 24 hour rainfall. This is attached. The scale on the right has been selected so that the curve is! also true for the accumulated volume of runoff. What we then did is plot a curve showing the rate of release of the flow through the 1-3/4" orifice. When the detention area is full (water surface at Elev. 32.00), the rate of release is known. It's 0.163 cfs. As the detention area is filling, however, the orifice is discharging but at a lesser rate. This lower rate was estimated, as we don't yet have this part on a computer program. Note on the chart the curve that is a constant distance below the hyetograph. This offset is 4081 cu. ft. The purpose of plotting this lower curve is as follows! When the orifice discharge curve intersects the lower curve, it means the detention are is full. The slope of the discharge curve at that point and to the right is 0.163 cfs. What's observed, however, is that the slope of the runoff curve is steeper or a higher flow rate than the orifice. This means that the water is running into the detention area which is already full, faster than it is leaving through the orifice. This means that overflow starts. The maximum rate (slope) of runoff is about 2.7 cfs during the 7-1/2 to 8 hours into the storm - but only 0.163 cfs is going through the orifice. Fortunately we have 8" and 6" pipes between the paved areas and this control structure! What happens is that the water surface in the detention area must rise higher in order for the additional flow rate to pass to the outfall. This higher water surface floods more area and thus there is more storage volume available. • I ( • • Page 4 Water rising from 32.00 to 32.45, however, floods all of the detention areas at the North side of the parking area. The result is about 4600 cu. ft. of additional storage when (or if) the water gets to this height. The rate of outflow would increase due to the overflow. This would be occurring at 0.72 cfs. (Note that this would be much less than the flow now occurring as we have essentially raised the outlet to the City drain from 29.08 to Elev. 32.) If the water surface rises to 32.45, water would flow off site at the NE°'corner. (I've designed the emergency overflow, however, at the entry road at Elev. 32.67 as it's easier to control and maintain finish paving grades than landscape grades.) By way of : comparison, the school building entry is at Elev. 33.38.What happens', is the best of two worlds - overflow doesn't occur as the 4600 cu. ft. of additional storage is more than enough to attenuate the 0.72 cfs rate of release to something less. (We didn't calculate it because it's only of academic interest at this point.) ; �V: vaasyf6 iYuAki-4 ;,,, ate' _�✓ 4,17 ` o Cif Ss/otAL 0,00 CURVE SOURCE 100 YR 24 HR. DESIGN STORM HYETOGRAPH VALUES FROM TABLE 3.5.1A OF KING CO. DRAINAGE MANUAL • . 3,8' 3,6 o NOTE: THE SLOPE OF THE RUNOFF CURVE ' o IN THIS AREA IS THE SAME OR LESS 22 THAN THE RATE OF ORIFICE 3,4' RELEASE WHICH IS 0.163 CFS ^' 20 3,21 -P STORM WATER OVERFLOW IS IN ' =O MAX. VOLUME OF RETENTION OPERATION DURING THIS STAGE ► 3 0 z, USED =4600 CU 4081 CU FT FT OF ADDITIONAL OF THE STORM 18 , 2,8 r STORAGE CAPACITY FROM ELEV z 32.00 TO ELEV 32.45 V)-. rn 2 6' T' ADDITIONAL STORAGE CAPACITY 16 ' r- USED ABOVE ELEV 32.00 = i-- 3114 CU FT. OK 4600 "' 2,4' z CU FT AVAILABLE TO 32.45 rn 2,2' 14 0 2,0' z 8' 2� z ��j 3100 CU FT QF STORAGE USED = ABOVE 32.00. ,4600 CU FT MAX. RATE OF RELEASE W/ W.S. 0 32.45 1,6' AVAILABLE UP TO ELEV 32.45� AND OVERFLOW 0 32.000 = 0.72 CFS 10 0 c—) 1,4' ..2r RUNOFF TO DETENTION SHOWN 8 IS A 'C' OF 0.9 TIMES RAINFALL 1,01 AMOUNT ON LEFT TIMES IMPERVIOUS AREA OF 0.58 AC NEW + 1.32 AC RATE OF RELEASE = 0.163 CFS 6 EXISTING ASPHALT do ROOF = 24,200 FROM ORIFICE WITH DETENTION FULL ,8r CU. FT. IN 24 HOURS. RATE OF RELEASE - - --- - - . ------— 4 r VARIES WITH HEAD 2 .2' DETENTION FULL IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 0 2 L 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 - 20 22 24 TIME IN HOURS SINCE START OF 100 YR 24 HR RAINFALL _' - U RENTON SCHOOL DIE',. _ / ^- C MAINTENANCE YARD GRAPHIC SCALE 1" = 100' • L • ( IIIII I I 1 0' 50' 100' 150' J• , • , _ • 1 . , , SARTORI HEALTH OCCUPATIONS N. 4th ST. & APPRENTICESHIP CENTER TIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII i _ _ NEW PARKING n hL a I HO — _ - 1111111` - EXISTING I Z - - PARKING 7A4—ti r- f - - 2,;E Q - W — — IX w t2 0 — _� N -v nl�lllll j; 1 _ - 1 I 1 _ I I ° • II LL II IIII N. 3rd ST. SINGLE FAMILY HSES n . 1