Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLUA90-072 • ._ __.___. _ ._ . . _ . •- - • - . \ _ ,..-- — „......, •. . . . . , . .. • . . , . . Fl ' 0 Th\l"11* 1 • • r 1 D 11 if] n . . Fr \\%\r"\...,„............2... i 1 . . _. . \ r E.7 I . ...._ ,....„/----/;- ---- --• \ - mr;A:W•urfT. Q.'-,' < . '• I ' i 7 1 _ri I , . •\ — — •. \ .\ I . or 111 0 . • • • • \:\\\ \ • -, \ ouNtr-r N.. . \ 111 0 6 er-MT;l e'l' eg-r. \ 1 l 1 ,____ / / ., . N. , c '., ii"7-Kes 0 . - \ , -,,\ \ i LI 1 1=} I j IQ • . \ \ - \\\ \ \\ I \ .. - • I .:• \ Aii .4/ , • <> . " \ • \ - '\\\ • -1-0.N.E--1, 71"_ -/Ni-t 2 V r r. . • / , . s_sFialuz:\,....,, ' C,FPi.,./ 1--- eaf2. / / / '-•, .CN9Ag, 14•1\/ / /''''.. 0 ,1 '. , , . . ---- - ,.../ / "-----„, -> - rAgK- „ , . / / ..... . „ , N / i . ,„ z -,/ / . / / / . ../ - /* , ..-' ,-- / / • . 1/ \\ ..-, -- . _ ...- -- ., - _ -- .., --- _ ...,..- .-- ..- -- , • /".-----. - • • . .k ', LrLAN'T . I , , l / - -- - • ".J / • . PLANNING DIVISIONCITY . OF RENTON 0 . .,... oriti---wr ..tilz:k.z..`g-goWeL•GO, JUL - 1 1990 C'„c-t . ' ------ IN ro 1•1 17 I - . ilitCkltf e" • 4***.• it) _ _- _. ' ; - I 1 • • • . -.K• k/ I/ . . • . • . -n7 _ o .1101c171-1 . . — CI 412' 2 V- 2.. ' .'\2 4-- -VIC1 N I T I . . . . . . 3- -a .: . • • ' • • a. 2-947 \ • . . - • NE-161-1W121-10917 L&AT -1 ,ICil \ • • - ....--...... mne..--_•k dr-e l''' Nill 1- AN/E..' . g -2 .00 . ____ . - , CITY OF RENTON . PARKS and RECREATION 200 Mill Avenue South -Renton, Washington 98055 Stoneway Sand & Concrete Company 1915 Maple Valley Highway Renton, WA. 98055 CITY OF RENTON PARKS and RECREATION 200 Mill Avenue South -Renton, Washington 98055 Shari's Restaraunt • 1820 Maple Valley Highway Renton, WA. 98055 ts, CITY OF RENTON NAL Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Earl Clymer, Mayor Lynn Guttmann, Administrator August 10, 1990 Randy Berg City of Renton Parks & Recreation 200 Mill Ave S Renton, WA 98055 SUBJECT: Cedar River Park Shop Improvements EC F;SA-072-90 Dear Mr. Berg: This letter is written on behalf of the Environmental Review Committee and is to inform you that they have completed their review of the environmental impacts of the above-referenced project. The Committee, on August 8, 1990, decided that your project may be issued a Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated with the following conditions: 1) This project is located within the Aquifer Protection Area. Therefore, no pesticides, herbicides or other hazardous materials shall be stored on the premises without resubmittal with a hazardous material handling plan including provisions for secondary containment, handling, and spill mitigation. This is to help ensure that this development does not adversely impact the aquifer. 2) The applicant shall provide the new landscaping as detailed on the landscape plan. 3) Additional landscaping or shields will be provided, as necessary, to ensure that glare from the park does not impact adjacent land uses. Notes to Applicant 1) The applicant shall provide plans showing the new drainage system with slopes, catch basins, oil/water separator and piping on the south/east sides of the proposed building. These plans shall also demonstrate the connection between the existing system and the new system. 2) The applicant shall conduct the necessary survey at the time of construction to ensure that the proposed shed does not encroach into the easement for the 42" Metro trunk line. Because the Environmental Review Committee imposed specific mitigation measures rather than issue a Determination of Significance, there is a required 15 day comment period during which comments are solicited from various agencies, jurisdictions or Individuals (including the applicant) who may have an interest in the Committee's decision. The comment period will end August 28, 1990. Following the end of the comment period, the City will finalize its Determination unless comments received require a reevaluation. Following the finalization of the Determination, there is a required 14 day appeal period. Staff urges you to contact the various City representatives, as appropriate, (e.g., the Public Works Division) as soon as possible, to obtain more information concerning specific mitigation elements recommended for ercdecsn/DKE/kac • this project, if you have specific questions. This information will assist you In planning for implementation of your project and will enable you to exercise your appeal rights more fully, If you choose to do so. TO appeal this Declaration, you must file your appeal document with the hearing examiner within fourteen (14) days of the date the Declaration of Non-significance is final or the Declaration of Significance has been published in the official city newspaper. See City Code Section 4-6-23, RCW 43.21C.075 and WAC 197-11- 680 for further details. There shall be only one appeal of a Declaration of Non-Significance or Declaration of Significance, and if an appeal has already been filed, your appeal may be Joined with the prior appeal for hearing or may be dismissed if the other appeal has already been heard. In addition, by the end of the comment period, we should be able to establish a tentative public hearing date before the Hearing Examiner, should a public hearing be necessary. If you have any questions or desire clarification of the above, please call Mark Pywell or me at 235-2550. For the vironment w Co i tee, Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator • ercdecsn/DKE/kac M c! > CITE OF RENTON "LL `' Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Earl Clymer, Mayor Lynn Guttmann, Administrator August 10, 1990 Washington State Department of Ecology Environmental Review Section Mail Stop PV-11 Olympia, WA 98504 SUBJECT: Environmental Determinations Transmitted herewith are copies of Environmental Determinations and Environmental Checklists for those projects reviewed by the Environmental Review Committee on August 8, 1990: DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED CEDAR RIVER PARK SHOP IMPROVEMENTS Proj Mgr: Mark Pywell ECF;SA-072-90 Applicant seeks approval to convert the old Taco Time building into a functional park maintenance building; to construct a storage shed;to construct an outdoor day-care area; and enlarge the parking lot. The project is located at 1911 Maple Valley Highway. HEATHERROSE PRELIMINARY PLAT Proj Mgr: Lenora Blauman ECF;PP-071-90 Applicant seeks to subdivide a 3.34 acre property, zoned R-1 into 14 parcels for future single-family home development. The platting encompasses four discrete parcels, of which two have been previously subdivided; three single-family residences which now exist on the property (proposed Lots #12, #13, #14) are to be retained. The project is located at NE 19th Street at Union Avenue. The 15 day comment period for these projects will end on August 28, 1990. Following the end of the comment period, the City will finalize its Determination unless comments received require a reevaluation. Following the finalization of the Determination, there is a required 14 day appeal period. To appeal this Declaration, you must file your appeal document with the hearing examiner within fourteen (14) days of the date the Declaration of Non-significance is final or the Declaration of Significance has been agncyltr/DKE/kac 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2631 Environmental Determinatio August 10, 1990 Page 2 published in the official city newspaper. See City Code Section 4-6-23, RCW 43.21C.075 and WAC 197-11- 680 for further details. There shall be only one appeal of a Declaration of Non-Significance or Declaration of Significance, and if an appeal has already been filed, your appeal may be joined with the prior appeal for hearing or may be dismissed if the other appeal has already been heard. If you have questions, please call the appropriate project manager or me at 235-2550. For the Environmental Review Committee, Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator cc: Mr. Craig Larson, King County Planning Division Mr. Gregory M. Bush, Metro Department of Wildlife Mr. Joe Robels, Department of Fisheries Mr. James Lutz, Department of Transportation Ms. Connie Corpuz, City of Seattle Duwamish Tribal Office Muckleshoot Tribal Office agncyltr/DKE/kac CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST NO.: ECF-072-90 . APPLICATION NO(S): SA-072-90 PROPONENT: City of Renton, Parks&Recreation PROJECT NAME: Cedar River Park Shop Improvements DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Applicant seeks approval to convert the old Taco Time building into a functional park maintenance building; to construct a storage shed;to construct an outdoor day-care area; and enlarge the parking lot. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 1911 Maple Valley Highway LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works • Development Planning Section , The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). Conditions were imposed as mitigation measures by the Environmental Review Committee under their authority of Section 4-2822(D) Renton Municipal Code (see attached sheet). These conditions are necessary to mitigate environmental impacts identified during the environmental review process. This Determination of Non-Significance -Mitigated (DNS-M) is issued under WAC 197-11-340(2). Because mitigation measures have been imposed,the lead agency will not act on this proposal for fifteen (15) days from August 13, 1990. Any interested party may submit written comments which must be submitted by 5:00 p.m., August 28, 1990, in order to be considered. A fourteen (14) day appeal period will commence following the finalization of the DNS-M. Responsible Official: Environmental Review Committee c/o Don Erickson,Zoning Administrator . Development Planning Section Department of Planning/Building/Public Works • 200 Mill Avenue South Renton,WA 98055 PUBLICATION DATE: August 13, 1990 DATE OF DECISION: August 8, 1990 SIGNATURES: AA LI___ _____ Lynn Abunman,I, Administrator Depart )t of PI Wing/Building/Public Works Abstaining/Conflict of Interest John E.Webley,Administrator Community Service Department • _6(_.,4),&......-- ee W I r, Fire Chief Rent 1 e Department DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED MITIGATION MEASURES PROJECT: Cedar River Park Shop Improvements PROPONENT: City of Renton, Parks&Recreation ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST: ECF-072-90 APPLICATION NUMBER: SA-072-90 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Applicant seeks approval to convert the old Taco Time building into a functional park maintenance building; to construct a storage shed;to construct an outdoor day-care area; and enlarge the parking lot. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 1911 Maple Valley Highway RECOMMENDATIONS: The Environmental Review Committee issued a Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated with the following conditions: . 1) This project is located within the Aquifer Protection Area. Therefore, no pesticides, herbicides or other hazardous materials shall be stored on the premises without resubmittal with a hazardous material handling plan including provisions for secondary containment, handling, and spill mitigation. This is to help ensure that this development does not adversely impact the aquifer. 2) The applicant shall provide the new landscaping as detailed on the landscape plan. 3) Additional landscaping or shields will be provided,as necessary,to ensure that glare from the park does not impact adjacent land uses. Notes to Applicant 1) The applicant shall provide plans showing the new drainage system with slopes, catch basins, oil/water separator and piping on the south/east sides of the proposed building. These plans shall also demonstrate the connection between the existing system and the new system. 2) The applicant shall conduct the necessary survey at the time of construction to ensure that the proposed shed does not encroach into the easement for the 42"Metro trunk line. • mmdoc-1 i • CURRENT ::...,.:.•;•:•.:.... NT...p .. ............ ... • ::::�::�:z::�:< ;::i�:�>�»�:�:�:�:�<::::> :::.::::..:�'F IDAV I'i�.::0�.;::S.E RV�CE;;:::gY:.:MAI Z,I N•G:.;::.:�;;:;:;::::::...:.:::::::::�:�::.::�>:�>;:�; On the $th day mo�o/-. 1.10txyyA r- • , 19gb , I deposited in thails crree1 pc containing .e_. • Pepart we,44( Zecssicvt documents. This information was .sent to: Name Representing cti bez Mayor Earl Clymer • _ Lynn Guttmann, Planning/Building/Public Works Administrator Jim Hanson, Development Services Manager Ronald Nelson, Building Director Councilman Richard M. Stredicke • • Members, Renton Planning Commission Glen Gordon, Fire Marshall - Arneta Henninger, Public Works Division • .Lawrence J.Warren, City Attorney - Valley Daily News • • . . (Signature of Sender) Subscribed and sworn to me this day of '19 • Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at therein. . e. c. . ....................... .MEMORANDUM CITY OF To Marilyn Peterson, City Clerk Date 2/25/91 From .andi Seeger, Development Services RECEIVED Subject City of Renton Parks and Recreation Dept (ECF;SA-072-90) C1rYCLERKS OFFICE This project has been completed by Administrative Site Approval and is ready to be filed with you. • I , SITE PLAN REVIEW COMMITTEE CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND DECISION November 15, 1990 APPLICATION NO.: ECF; SA-072-90 APPLICANT: Parks and Recreation Department, City of Renton LOCATION: Cedar River Park 1911 Maple Valley Highway SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Create a functional park maintenance building from the old Taco Time building, construct a new shed (approximately 140' x 80'), construct an outdoor play area for small children, and enlarge the parking area by 51 parking stalls for a total of 375 parking stalls. The Committee review was conducted after receiving written comment from all divisions of the Public Works Department,all sections of the Planning Division,and the Fire, Police, and Parks Departments. The following exhibits were entered into the record: Exhibit No. 1: Yellow file containing application, proof of posting and publication and other documentation pertinent to this request. Exhibit No.2: Site plan (received July 1, 1990). Exhibit No.3: Landscape plan (received July 1, 1990). Exhibit No.4: Building elevation plans. FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS,AND DECISION Having reviewed the written record in the matter, the Site Plan Review Committee now makes and enters the following: Findings: 1. The applicant, the Parks and Recreation Department, has requested site plan approval to allow creation of a functional park maintenance building from the 1,700 square foot old Taco Time building which was abandoned when Taco Time constructed new facilities, construction of a new shed (approximately 140' x 80') to park the Community Services vehicles in, construction of an outdoor day care area which will include play equipment for young children, and enlargement of the parking area to provide overflow parking for the Carco Theatre and other park facilities. 2. The applicant's file containing the application, the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) documentation,the comments from various City departments,the public notices requesting citizen comment, and other pertinent documents was entered as Exhibit No. 1. 3. Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and SEPA (RCW 43.21 C, 1971 as amended),a Determination of Non-Significance- Mitigated was issued for the subject proposal on August 8, 1990,with the following conditions: a. This project is located within the City's Aquifer Protection Area. Therefore, no pesticides, herbicides or other hazardous materials shall be stored on the premises without resubmittal with a hazardous material handling plan including provisions for secondary containment, handling, and spill mitigation. This is to help ensure that this development does not adversely impact the aquifer. b. The applicant shall provide the new landscaping as detailed on the landscape plan. c. Although there have been no complaints of glare from the park at this time. Additional landscaping or shields will be provided by the Recreation Department, as necessary, to ensure that glare from the park does not impact adjacent land uses. - Administrative Site Plan Review Report and Decision November 15, 1990 Page 2 Notes to Applicant a. in compliance with the Municipal Code the applicant shall provide plans showing the new drainage system with slopes, catch basins, oil/water separator and piping on the south/east sides of the proposed building. These plans shall also demonstrate the connection between the existing system and the new system. b. The applicant shall conduct the necessary survey at the time of construction to ensure that the proposed shed does not encroach into the easement for the 42" Metro trunk line. A copy of the survey shall be submitted to Metro. 4. Plans for the proposal have been reviewed by all City departments affected by the impact of this proposal. • 5. The subject proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan designation for Recreation uses. 6. The site plan as presented, provides sufficient parking to comply with the Parking and Loading Ordinance of the City of Renton. 7. The subject site was annexed into the City in 1959 by the Adoption of Ordinance No. 1965, amended by Ordinances No. 1787 and 1789(1959). The site was zoned Public Use. 8. Land use surrounding the subject site is Public Use (P-1) which includes the portions of the Cedar River Park which are not included in this development proposal and Heavy Industrial (H-1) to the east which includes the concrete plat. 9. The applicant's site plan complies with the criteria for site plan review,as discussed below: SITE PLAN APPROVAL CRITERIA Section 4-31-33(D) lists ten criteria that the City is asked to consider along with all other relevant information in making a decision on a Site Plan Approval application. These include the following: General Criteria 1. Conformance with the Comprehensive Plan, its elements and policies. The proposed use on the subject site conforms with the Comprehensive Plan designation for Recreation. 2. Conformance with existing land use regulations. The proposed site plan conforms with the development standards for the underlying Public Zone (P-1). The location of the structures and parking lot meet all setback and landscaping requirements. 3. Mitigation of impact to surrounding properties and uses. The impacts of the proposed use to surrounding properties and uses include increased traffic both on and off-site,and aesthetics. These are discussed below: Aesthetics The aesthetic impacts from the new parking area and shed will be mitigated by the proposed and existing landscaping of the park should not be reduced by the proposed construction. No negative impacts are anticipated from the new children's' play area as this is located within the interior of the park and the wall around the area will match the existing Renton Community Recreation Center to which the wall will be attached. The perimeter fencing and landscaping will not be affected by the construction of the children's play area or the shed. The existing landscaping, which consist of Deodar,Cedar, Norway Maple, Douglas Fir and groundcover,will buffer the adjacent land uses from the proposed development. stpinrpt -' ' Administrative Site Plan Review Report and Decision November 15, 1990 Page 3 In order to protect the Cedar River from development the applicant has indicated that the new children's play area will be located a minimum of 200' from the Cedar River and that all other development is located is located more than 200'from the river. Aquifer Protection Area As noted previously, the project site is located within the Aquifer Protection Zone. The applicant has stated that the proposed shed will be used for the parking of small trucks while not in use for park maintenance activities. The plans as submitted indicate that this area will be covered with crushed rock. Staff is concerned that oil or gas leaks from the truck engines and employee cars could impact the aquifer and nearby City wells. Staff has recommended that the area be paved with asphaltic concrete or concrete and provided with a tight lined storm drainage system to ensure the protection of the aquifer. Staff is also concerned that if vehicle maintenance were to occur on-site that the oil and other by products could get into the soil. No maintenance of vehicles should occur at the proposed facilities. 4. Mitigation of impacts of the proposed site plan to the site. Aesthetics The applicant has indicated that a new six foot tall chain link fence with vertical slates (either wood or plastic), matching the existing fencing, will be constructed around the area in which the proposed shed is to be constructed. This fence will screen the shed and work area from the remainder of the park. As noted above, the proposed parking area will be landscaped. There will also be a 3 foot concrete wall constructed around the proposed children's play area that will match the adjacent building. Easements Metro has indicated that there is a 42" waterline and easement adjacent to the area where the applicant has proposed to construct a shed. The applicant has indicated that they are aware of this easement and will not encroach on it. 5. Conservation of area-wide property values. The proposed landscaping and additional overflow parking should make the subject site more attractive and should help to conserve area-wide property values. 6. Safety and efficiency of vehicle and pedestrian circulation. As a part of this project, the applicant will be providing an additional fifty-one paved parking stalls. This parking will be available as overflow parking for the larger events held at the Cedar River Park, such as events at the Carco Theatre. The Transportation Systems and Police Department staff have indicated that the additions to this park should not have any significant impacts on their services. The shed and children's play area are well separated from the interior roadways. The proposed overflow parking area will reduce the number of vehicles circulating through the park looking for open parking spaces during peak use events. The provision of the additional parking should reduce the number of vehicles parking along area roads during special events. The applicant has indicated that the new parking area will be lighted for the safety of vehicle and pedestrian circulation. 7. Provision of adequate light and air. The applicant has indicated on the site plan that additional lighting will be provided only in the overflow parking area. Adequate lighting already exists throughout the rest of the park. The proposed improvements should not effect light and air circulation. 8. Mitigation of noise, odors,and other harmful or unhealthy conditions. Due to the proximity of the Cedar River and the fact that the project site is within an Aquifer Protection Area, the applicant has indicated that the shed will not be used for the storage of hazardous materials (e.g., pesticides, herbicides). The proposed use is not expected to increase the noise level created within the existing park. Section D.6. of the P-1 zone states that 'Truck traffic and other noise normally associated with an operation shall be limited to the hours between 7 A.M. and 7 P.M. unless the hearing examiner shall find that due to specific circumstances of a particular application, other hours of operation stpinrpt .l Administrative Site Plan Review Report and Decision November 15,'1990 Page 4 should be established in order to protect the public health safety and welfare. The outdoor activities planned for the Cedar River Park generally do not continue on into the late evening hours. The adjacent land uses, a sand and gravel company and a restaurant, have not registered any complaints about noise generated from the park. If we limit traffic here, it would limit Carco Theatre and the other park facilities to levels below which they were designed and approved to handle. The project is located within the City's Aquifer Protection Area. There is concern that the oil from the parked cars could enter into the aquifer. In accordance with the Municipal Code, oil/water separators will be used to ensure that the oil from the parking areas does not enter into the groundwater. 9. Availability of public services and facilities to accommodate the proposed use. Police and Fire Prevention Bureau staff report adequate resources to provide anticipated services to the site during construction activities and operations with system improvements fees and with Code-required improvements(e.g.,20 foot wide fire lane,fire hydrants). The Public Works Section of the Department of Planning/Building/Public Works has indicated that, in accordance with Municipal Code requirements, plans for the new storm drainage system with oil/water separators will have to be submitted for review. 10. Prevention of neighborhood deterioration and blight. The proposed development will provide improved recreational opportunities for children and assist in the maintenance of the park. This should result in a better utilized and maintained development which, in turn, should enhance the appearance of the neighborhood. Decision: The site plan for Cedar River Park Shop Improvements, File No. ECF; SA-072-90 is approved subject to the following conditions: -1. The applicant shall ensure that no pesticides, herbicides, or other hazardous materials shall be stored on the premises without resubmittal with a hazardous material handling plan including provisions for secondary containment, handling, and spill mitigation. This condition Is established to help ensure that the proposed action does not adversely impact the City's Sole Source Aquifer. •2. The applicant shall provide the necessary survey data to Metro to ensure that the proposed shed does not encroach on the Metro easement and shall provide the City verification from METRO that the integrity of this easement is preserved. 3. The applicant shall pave and curb the area within the proposed new fence around and within the new storage shed (the area indicated on the plans as being covered with crushed rock)with asphalt or concrete. �4. The applicant shall ensure that all catch basins and storm drains serving storage or public parking areas are tight lined to their outfall. 4. The applicant shall not repair of perform maintenance work on any vehicles within the proposed shed or the adjacent area. For the purpose of these decisions, the terms "should"and "shall"are to be considered mandatory and the term"may"is considered discretionary. Notes to Applicant: An applicant complying with these provisions and willing to hold the City harmless for any expense or damages incurred for work begun prior to the exhaustion of the 14-day appeal period and/or for work which may consequently be stopped by an appeal or work required to be altered or returned to its preconstruction state, may begin construction activities with the issuance of the proper permits. stpinrpt • ORDERED this 7th day of November, 1990, on behalf of the City of Renton's Site Plan -eview Committee. V Donald K. Erickson,AICP Secretary TRANSMITTED this 8th day of November, 1990,to the parties of record: TRANSMITTED this 8th day of November, 1990,to the following: Mayor Earl Clymer Lynn Guttmann, Planning/Building/Public Works Administrator Jim Hanson, Development Services Manager Ronald Nelson, Building Director Councilman Richard M. Stredicke Members, Renton Planning Commission Glen Gordon, Fire Marshall Arneta Henninger, Public Works Division Lawrence J.Warren, City Attorney Valley Daily News REQUESTS FOR RECONSIDERATION must be filed in writing on or before November 23, 1990. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Site Plan Review Committee is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior meeting, may make a written request to the Zoning Administrator for review by the Site Plan Committee within fourteen (14)days of the decision. This request shall set forth the specific errors relied upon by such appellant, and the Committee may, after review of the record, take further action as it deems proper. If an appeal is made to the Hearing Examiner, requests for reconsideration will be forwarded to that office for consideration at the same time as the appeal. AN APPEAL TO THE HEARING EXAMINER is governed by Title IV, Section 31-33(K), which requires that such appeals be filed directly with the Hearing Examiner. Appeals must be made in writing before 5 p.m.on November 23, 1990,accompanied by a$75.00 fee and other specific requirements. THE APPEARANCE OF FAIRNESS DOCTRINE provides that no ex parte (private one-on-one) communications may occur concerning land use decision. The Doctrine applies not only to the initial committee decision, but to all Request for Reconsideration as well as Appeals to the Hearing Examiner. All communications after the decision date must be made in writing through the Zoning Administrator. All communications are public record and this permits all interested parties to know the contents of the communication and would allow them to openly rebut the evidence in writing. Any violation of this doctrine could result in the invalidation of the request by the Court. • $ 59.119 51067 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION Kathleen Hoover ,beingfirst dulysworn on oath states NOTICELT ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATIF O that he/she is the Chief Clerk of the ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTON VALLEY DAILY NEWS The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a Determination of Non- • Kent Edition • Renton Edition • Auburn Edition Significance-Mitigated for the following pro-" ject(s) under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code. The following Applicant(s) Daily newspapers published six (6) times a week. That said newspapers have completed a mitigation process: are legal newspapers and are now and have been for more than six CEDAR RIVER PARK SHOP monthsprior to the date ofpublication referred to, printed andpublished IMPROVEMENTS ECF;SA-072-90 in the English language continually as daily newspapers in Kent, King Applicant seeks approval to convert County, Washington. The Valley Daily News has been approved as a legal the old Taco Time building into a newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for functional Park Maintenance build- King County. i ; to cnstuct a e shed; const u toanroutdoor daycare area and enlarge the parking lot. The notice in the exact form attached, was published in the Kent Edition Further information regarding this action XX XX XX is available in the Development Services Renton Edition , Auburn Edition , (and not in supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers Division, Third shi Floor,235-2550.Mu5 ThisB Deng- PP g Y Renton, Washington, Deter- during the below stated period. The annexed notice a Pub 1 i c Notice mination is FINAL. To appeal this Declara- tion, you must file your appeal document (Environmental Determination) 45 75 with the hearing examiner within fourteen (14) days of the date the Declaration of Non-significanceis final or the Declaration of published on Sep t . 3 , 19 9 0 • Significance has been published in the offi- wascial city newspaper. See City Code Section 4-6-23, RCW 43.21C.075 and WAC 197-11-680 for further details. There shall Non- Theb full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the Si onlyc onec orap Declarationel of a Declaration Sign iofs , Significance or of Significance, Sum of$ 5 9 _9 4 and if an appeal has already been filed, your appeal may be joined with the prior appeal for hearing or may be dismissed if /(1 (" W1-{,,X) kle2-61/} the other appeal has already been heard. This appeal period will end at 5:00 p.m. on September 17, 1990. Any appeal of this decision may be made to the City's Hearing Examiner, Municipal Building, 200 Mill Ave- nue South, Renton, Washington 98055. An Subscribed and sworn before me this day of e p 19 appeal must state clearly, in writing, why the Determination should be revised and must be accompanied by a non-refundable $75.00 filing fee. Published in the Valley Daily News on ‘1 ,(),/ September 3, 1990. Acct. No. 51067. 4575 Notary Public for the State of Washington residing at-Auburn, King County, Washington VDN#87 Revised 4/89 NOTICE.OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTON • The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated for the following project(s) under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code. The following Applicant(s) have completed a mitigation process: CEDAR RIVER PARK SHOP IMPROVEMENTS• ECF;SA-072-90 Applicant seeks approval to convert the old Taco Time building into a functional Park Maintenance building; to construct a storage shed; to construct an outdoor daycare area; and enlarge the parking lot. Further.information regarding this action is available in the Development Services Division, Third Floor, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington, 235-2550. This Determination Is FINAL. To appeal this Declaration, you must file your appeal document with the hearing examiner within fourteen (14) days of the date the Declaration of Non-significance is final or the Declaration of Significance has been published In the official city newspaper. See City Code Section 4-6-23, RCW 43.21C.075.and WAC 197-1.1-680 for further details. There shall be only one appeal of a Declaration of Non-Significance or Declaration of Significance, and if an appeal has already been filed, your appeal may be Joined with the prior appeal for hearing or may be dismissed if the other appeal has already been heard. This appeal period will end at 5:00 p.m. on September 17, 1990. Any appeal of this decision may be made to the City's Hearing Examiner, Municipal Building, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, Washington 98055. An appeal must state clearly, in writing, why the Determination should be revised and must be accompanied by a non-refundable$75.00 filing fee. Publication Date: September 3, 1990 • Account No. 51067 N OT ICIEj ENVIRONMENTAL DECLARATION APPLICATION NO. ECF;SA-072-90 • PROPOSED ACTION CEDAR RIVER PARK SHOP IMPROVEMENTS CITY OF RENTON, PARKS & RECREATION APPLICANT SEEKS APPROVAL TO CONVERT THE OLD TACO TIME BUILDING INTO A FUNCTIONAL PARK MAINTENANCE BUILDING; TO CONSTRUCT A STORAGE SHED;TO CONSTRUCT AN OUTDOOR DAY- CARE AREA; AND ENLARGE THE PARKING LOT. GENERAL LOCATION AND OR ADDRESS 1911 MAPLE VALLEY HIGHWAY POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE [E.R.C.) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION ❑DOES XDOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT DWILL $WILL NOT BE REQUIRED. THE CITY OF RENTON WILL NOT ACT ON THIS PROPOSAL FOR 15 DAYS FROM THE DATE BELOW. COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY AN APPEAL OF THE ABOVE DETERMINATION MAY • BE FILED WITH THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER BY 5:00 P.M., SPPTEMRFR 17. 1990 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON PLANNING DIVISION AT 235-2550. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE - WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION ___ CERTIFICATION I , VI MYc. • Sa.Ve, 1c�. , - HEREBY CERTIFY THAT 3 COPIES OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENT WERE POSTED BY ME IN • 3 CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON OR NEARBY THE DESCRIBED PROPERTY ON 1- 4 - 70 . se µET J.p �*i� �. G • .......• (il *I ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me wa ••' .• v Q` �gS10N�, • Notary Publi in and for the State of 47as�i Q' �� A :Ok•13 •• residing 'n , on thgp� NOTARY S`'rGNED : m J�day of e C N PUBLIC a : A • v o�: po So-71. GAFg 1°9 • ,twoo N OT C E ENVIRONMENTAL DECLARATION APPLICATION NO. ECF;SA-072-90 PROPOSED ACTION CEDAR RIVER PARK SHOP IMPROVEMENTS CITY OF RENTON, PARKS & RECREATION APPLICANT SEEKS APPROVAL TO CONVERT THE OLD TACO TIME BUILDING INTO A FUNCTIONAL PARK MAINTENANCE BUILDING; TO CONSTRUCT A STORAGE SHED; TO CONSTRUCT AN OUTDOOR DAY- CARE AREA; AND ENLARGE THE PARKING LOT. GENERAL LOCATION AND OR ADDRESS 1911 MAPLE VALLEY HIGHWAY POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE ( E. R.C. ] HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION CIDOES XDOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT DWILL )4WILL NOT BE REQUIRED. THE CITY OF RENTON WILL NOT ACT ON THIS PROPOSAL FOR 15 DAYS FROM THE DATE BELOW. COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY AN APPEAL OF THE ABOVE DETERMINATION MAY BE FILED WITH THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER BY 5:00 P. M., RFp-rFMRFR 17. 1990 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON PLANNING DIVISION AT 235 -2550. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION yy ti Jz STATg ,JOSEPH R. BLUM Director �4:1/889 apY PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF RENTON STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF FISHERIES AUG 2 1 1990 115 General Administration Building • Olympia, Washington.98504 • (206) 753-6600 , ;( o June 20, 1990 �'`—.cop Environmental Review Committee c/o Don Erickson, Zoning Administrator Development Planning Section Department of Planning/Building/Public Works , 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 SUBJECT: Determination of Non-Significance (Mitigated) , ECF-072-90 Cedar River. Park Shop Improvements- Cedar River, Tributary to Lake Washington, King County, WDF SEPA Log No . 12000, WRIA 08 . 0299 Dear Mr . Erickson: The Washington Department of Fisheries (WDF) has reviewed the above proposal and has the following comments . Maintaining habitat for natural populations of trout and salmon in urban areas of the Pacific Northwest has become challenging in recent years . Increasing rates and intensity of development, especially in the Puget Sound reg ion, have adversely affected streams to the point where only remnant populations exist in many areas . Not only has structural habitat been lost through clearing of streamside vegetation, removal of instream debris and rechanneling, but physical habitat features have been altered through improper stormwater management . Retaining habitat for these fish is not only important culturally to the northwest but: is the mandate of the Washington Department of Fisheries (WDF) . Stormwater run-off from urban areas should be metered into streams at near the pre-development rate to maintain streambank and streambed stability. Increased erosion and scouring are not • only unacceptable to adjacent landowners, who generally expect no, . change in channel boundaries, but rapidly deteriorate both spawning and rearing habitat for fish, especially trout and salmon . Additionally, inadequate metering of stormwater reduces opportunities to remove toxicants from run-off waters fahich can have an adverse effect on all aquatic life . WDF 's stormwater recommendations are attached . On-site detention of stormwater should be required for this project. • Don Erickson - ECF; SA 043-90 June 20, 1990 Page 2 Thank you for this opportunity to comment. If you have any questions regarding these comments please contact me at ( 206 ) 545-6582 . Sincerely, AZ116 /,E/l11't,�� Gayle eitman Regional Habitat Manager gk Attachment ( 1) cc : WDF - Olympia 4 3 . The biofilter width should be designed based on a two- year 24-hour.. peak flow, and the following; a . Velocities should be less than 1. 5 fps . b. The flow depth should be less than 4 inches . c. Longitudinal slope should average 2 to 4 percent. For slopes 'greater than 4 percent rock or log Check dams should be installed every 50 feet. 4 . Side slopes should be no steeper than three • . horizontal : one vertical . • • • • • • • • • • Attachment 1 WATER QUANTITY • • Increased run-off from development should be retained and infiltrated to preserve base stream flows, and/or detained in a manner to preserve the stream . channel ' s dominant discharge . . For . • Soil Conservation Service (SCS ) ' hydrologic soil groups . Type A and B use of infiltration basins should be. considered ... Site investigation and design criteria are essential for successful performance ,of infiltration basins . Infiltration could. • • significantly reduce the volume required . for detention. For detention basins, WDF recommends the following criteria' for protecting physical habitat features in streams . . Detention basin . performance shall be such that discharge from the developed area ' meets the• following criteria: :.. ' Fifty percent • of the pre-developed two-year peak . release rate forthe two-year developed- design storm.• . . • ' . Fifty percent of the two-year peak adjusts . for the 'extended duration of release which occurs as a result of the increase in run-off volume from the developed state . 2 . The pre-developed 25-year peak release rate for the 25- year - developed design storm. Pre- and post-development run-off rates should be determined by using a continuous simulation model such as the U. S . EPA HSPF computer program. If such a watershed model is not available, a rainfall event simulation model can be used. Run-off should be computed using a SCS-based hydrograph method, and the rainfall event should be a Type lA distribution with a 24-hour duration. For purposes of analysis the peak outflow from the detention basin should occur within 30 hours from the start of the design storm. For an appropriate level' of protection from stream channel erosion detention basin outflow rate and the time for which it occurs must be analyzed . Since inflow and outflow are • independent, storage routing is required to perform this analysis . A level pool routing technique is acceptable . A suggested process is as follows .1) select trial detention basin size, 2) determine stage-storage relationship, 3 ) select outlet • structure type and size, 4 ) determine stage-discharge relationship, 5) route the developed inflow hydrograph through the detention basin and 6 ) find whether the outflow meets the established criteria . A variable two stage outlet structure will be required to meet this performance . • -- i WATER QUALITY • Pollutants in stormwater run-off should be treated using best • management practices for the protection. of. freshwater and marine shore aquatic life. Treatment- of stormwater run-off with__ a• wet detention pond (Considerations for the:Use of _ Wet ;Ponds for Water,; . • Quality Enhancement, Kulzer;':. 1989 ).: and . biofiltration channel- - • 'I (Biofiltration Systems for Storm. Runoff Water Quality. Control, . • Horner, • 1988 ) . will provide acceptable . water quality: control . • Where possible, . biofiltrationch'anne'ls . of any length should be • used for pre-treatment of• stormwater . run-off . To provide an . • • acceptable.:hydraulic residence time for treatment, the two-year - 24-hour storm should - be. detained.: and :released -at 100 percent _ of . • the pre-existing peak . Use .the methods : in - the water.:quantity , • section for run-off calculation and detention .basin -sizing_ Sedimentation and erosion control practices should be included into the design= to ' prevent water quality features .from -becoming • ontaminated.'. Also, ' regular maintenance is required to ensure. . pollutant removal effectiveness . The following are acceptable design - standards for ' wet ponds° and biofiltration .channels . . . • . • . Wet Ponds -' A pool of water retained in a pond by placing - the outlet above the pond bottom. 4j 'I 1. Permanent pond surface area . should equal 2 percent of the catchment area for' residential, and 3 percent for commercial . ' 2 . Ponds shall have a minimum of two cells . i Short-circuiting should be minimized by a pond length- ', to-width ratio greater than 3`:1, use of baffles, etc. 4 . The permanent water depth should be. 2-3 feet. ,,I 5 . Permanent wet pond volume . should not be part of the detention volume required... .: . Biofilters - A filter strip or swale used to treat I stormwater run-off by interaction -with vegetation and soil surfaces . - . ' 1 . Avoid gravelly and course sandy soils in order to maximize water contact with vegetation and .the soil • surface . Sites with course soils are more .appropriate • for infiltration areas . . . . . • •2 . Biofilters should be a minimum of 200 feet in length . when outletting from the project development . � Washington State Duane Berentson �I/ Department of Transportation Secretary of Transportation District 1 15325 S.E. 30th Place Bellevue, Washington 98007-6538 (206)562-4000 DATE: August 15, 1990 • TO: Don Erickson, Chief, Current Planning Planning Division Public Works Department 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 FROM: JAMES L. LUTZ, P.E. , Utilities/Developer Engineer Washington State Department of Transportation District 1 15325 SE 30th Place, MS 113 Bellevue, WA 98007-6597 This letter is in response to the Mitigated Determination of Non-Significance documents that we received from the City of Renton on August 14 , 1990. X We have reviewed the subject documents and have determined that the traffic generated by these developments will not have a significant adverse impact upon any state highways . File No. SR No. ECF-071-90 900 ECF-072-90 Rxrks/Ceztag i cr 169 Please contact Robert Eichelsdoerfer of my Developer Services section at PHONE: 562-4297 , SCAN 638-4297 , if you have any questions. S.T.. >:•;:. . :.:::::: : ::.Mn. >:;::::;. Y....OE..RENT >:::;:::>: _:>::>::..::s::::: ::. > >CURRENT;<>P.LAN::::::::::> ::::>::::;:::::::::>::::<:::: ::z::: ::» <::::...... . .. NIN . :: . ': > : . ::;;:; :» :::;>::::::<.::.: :;.::.:.::�:.:><,;<.:;<;<:>.:.:.: - ::>�:: <:::>:::: ::: :> »: : ::A:FFIDAVIT 'OF ERVICE BY:.::MAI.LING.::::;:::::.. . : On the 190N day of �,�,� ct 19110 , I deposited in the mails o `the nited St tes a sealed envelope containing ckeJd tt �a li..► ,try.(1,ces documents . This information was .sent to: . Name Representing '- Ecr)lalci Gal (..SLYArn 1 a-_,_. ci.D —Pab.,,,,L. t,-, Ile-7r,, - -r wig <<- .. 1 o c .s...-RI)ICe.15 ` c -F he.Y, ICLYY1e-.% t..11-4-t- e--- -k.,p-t 4 —TES G-nnt.e -T, T. .t.Q.s ,tsh Tri of. tAiir. e Nort "TV o t OFce • (Signature of Sender) Sak., yam . 1 •Subscribed and��e P r!'q�� me this f�7= day of /".1 i..1 6.4i;.. &***0 i u NOTARY : 17 Alu LfiL� C: .L! t4/ N t _, Not Pub ' in and for the Z . `?�Pusvc c Sta of Washington residing :%tto` 7 s 199A•*�O`.� at lei •••'���wAS*_,G._••• therein. Project I a m e . -e . } - S �� Cutue " YC atop I. .a �eytrDe.. a Pr.ojeCt' Number: t- (: =Oif, 1p sick - o-rZ-gb AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION 31 6' a t h 1 e e n Hoover ,being first duly sworn on oath states NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL that he/she is the Chief Clerk of the DETERMINATION VALLEY DAILY NEWS ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTON • Kent Edition • Renton Edition • Auburn Edition The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a Determination of pro- DailyNon- newspapers six (6) times a week. That said newspapers ject(s)icunder Non- Significance-Mitigated for the followingthe published under the authority of the Renton are legal newspapers and are now and have been for more than six Municipal Code. monthsprior to the date ofpublication referred to, printed andpublished • CEDAR RIVER PARK SHOP • IMPROVEMENTS in the English language continually as daily newspapers in Kent, King ECF;SA-072-90 County, Washington. The Valley Daily News has been approved as a legal , Applicant seeks approval to convert the a newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for functiodnal me park nto Tacoimaintenance buildingibuild- King County. ing; to construct a storage shed; to construct an outdoor day-care area; The notice in the exact form attached, waspublished in the Kent Edition and ise localrge the parking lot.The pro- Valley ject is located at 1911 Maple Valley X X , Renton Edition %X , Auburn Edition { , (and not in Highway. supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers HEATHERROSE PRELIMINARY PLAT during the below stated period. The annexed notice a Public Notice ECF;PP-071-90 Applicant seeks to subdivide a 3.34 (Environmental Datarnination) 1,I acre property,zoned R-1 into 14 par- cels for future single-family home development. The platting encom- passes four discrete parcels, of A u was published on t 3 0 which two ;have been previously subdivided; three single-family resi- dences which now exist on the prop- The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the erty (proposed Lots #12, #13, #14) 3 b .5 3 are to be retained. The project is sum of$ located at NE 19th Street at Union Avenue. (/'6d4U-e-e/X) 41-61 This decision will be finalized in fifteen (15)days. Written comments received after 5:00 p.m.,August 28, 1990 will not be con- sidered. A fourteen (14) day appeal period will commence following the finalization of DNS-M. The mitigation measures imposed Subscribed and sworn before me this 2 0 t h day ofA u u s t 19 9 0 by the City of Renton's Environmental Review Committee are available at the - Development Services Division,Third Floor, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington 98055. Phone: 235-2550. Published in the Valley Daily News on • August 13, 1990. Acct. #51067. 4453 NapPublic for the State of Washington residing at Auburn, King County, Washington VDN#87 Revised 4/89 PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF RENTON SEP 1 3 1990 RECEIVED NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has Issued a Determination of Non-Significance- Mitigated for the following project(s) under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code. CEDAR RIVER PARK SHOP IMPROVEMENTS ECF;SA-072-90 Applicant seeks approval to convert the old Taco Time building into a functional park maintenance building; to construct a storage shed; to construct an outdoor day-care area; and enlarge the parking lot. The project is located at 1911 Maple Valley Highway. HEATHERROSE PRELIMINARY PLAT ECF;PP-071-90 Applicant seeks to subdivide a 3.34 acre property, zoned R-1 into 14 parcels for future single-family home development. The platting encompasses four discrete parcels, of which two have been previously subdivided; three single-family residences which now exist on the property (proposed Lots #12, #13, #14) are to be retained. The project is located at NE 19th Street at Union Avenue. This decision will be finalized in fifteen (15) days. Written comments received after 5:00 p.m., August 28, 1990 will not be considered. A fourteen (14) day appeal period will commence following the finalization of DNS-M. The mitigation measures imposed by the City of Renton's Environmental Review Committee are available at the Development Services Division, Third Floor, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington 98055. Phone: 235-2550. Publication Date: August 13, 1990 Account No. 51067 STAT S..-'.0 State of Washington -'1 b- '-== DEPARTMENT OF FISHERIES y�2 Room 115, General Administration Bldg.,Olympia,WA 98504 �J USA25 f %?r i890 g Yn►P r u - 411 q42u l r, /aU 1 COW ah % LI) ../recicscr), +1 ENVIRONMENTAL DECLARATION APPLICATION NO. ECF;SA-072-90 PROPOSED ACTION CEDAR RIVER PARK SHOP IMPROVEMENTS CITY OF RENTON, PARKS & RECREATION APPLICANT SEEKS APPROVAL TO CONVERT THE OLD TACO TIME BUILDING INTO A FUNCTIONAL PARK MAINTENANCE BUILDING; TO CONSTRUCT A STORAGE SHED; TO CONSTRUCT AN OUTDOOR DAY- `' CARE AREA; AND ENLARGE THE PARKING LOT. GENERAL LOCATION AND OR ADDRESS 1911 MAPLE VALLEY HIGHWAY POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (E.R.C.] HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION ❑DOES XbOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT DWILL (WILL NOT BE REQUIRED. THE CITY OF RENTON WILL NOT ACT ON THIS PROPOSAL FOR 15 DAYS FROM.THE DATE BELOW. COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY AUGUST 28, 1990 AN APPEAL OF THE ABOVE DETERMINATION MAY BE FILED WITH THE RENTONTARING EXAMINER BY 5:00 P.M., ' / FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON PLANNING DIVISION AT 235-2550. - DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE • • • WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION • • C6V„L FICATION •�*Ike. pi4 I , /a 4 � i , ,: e' sic Y THAT �. �.4�,� � COPIES Or THE ABOVE DOCUMENT'WERE EOS.'(`EDA405 1,f � i 1 • c� CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON OR NEARBY THE .4S1C,Fr ig P OPIRTY ON /f • op',,• 57//3J�o ATTEST: Subscribed and sworP4tIv° n p�p�Q *Oa Notary Publi , in and for the State of uashingt91 residin in �yL-Q/�/ , on the [3 "t SIGNED : Z day of N OT ICE ENVIRONMENTAL DECLARATION APPLICATION NO. ECF;SA-0'72-90 PROPOSED ACTION CEDAR RIVER PARK SHOP IMPROVEMENTS CITY OF RENTON, PARKS & RECREATION APPLICANT SEEKS APPROVAL TO CONVERT THE OLD TACO TIME BUILDING INTO A FUNCTIONAL PARK MAINTENANCE BUILDING; TO CONSTRUCT A STORAGE SHED; TO CONSTRUCT AN OUTDOOR DAY- CARE AREA; AND ENLARGE THE PARKING LOT. GENERAL LOCATION AND OR ADDRESS 1911 MAPLE VALLEY HIGHWAY POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE [ E.R.C. 3 HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION ❑DOES kiDOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT DWILL NWILL NOT BE REQUIRED. THE CITY OF RENTON WILL NOT ACT ON THIS PROPOSAL FOR 15 DAYS FROM THE DATE BELOW. COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY AUGUST 28, 1990 AN APPEAL OF THE ABOVE DETERMINATION MAY BE FILED WITH THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER BY 5:00 P.M., FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON PLANNING DIVISION AT 2 3 5-2 5 5 0. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION : • .Fr: T .JIr:•'•i:,Yi.•.•. :•:'Iv:•:'?i�'i}::i:�iii??:^??'r?}}}ii:i':':':'iiii:vi}ii:.;y,:<�:v::i::•:•:• F.I CATI ...... ....... ....... ... ................ . .. .. ROPERTY>O'IIVNERS<:: ::<;�>::: ::<»»::::::::::>::>::::> I • te..: :: :: ::,..::.::.::.F:::::•;;;>:::::::»>;>:::.::;;::>:::;>:;> ***FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY*** • . PROJECT TITLE: `{R‘ - k Sks-p Im�JK��erner � APPLICANT: Ci'L 'Re-v n APPLICATION NUMBER: SSA —017.610 The following Is a list of property owners within 300 feet of the subject site.'The Community Development Department will notify these Individuals of the proposed development. •NAME ADDRESS �t®�av °jAS�,ASSESSOR'S PARCEL 4WMBER `f Stoneway Concrete ' 1915 Maple Valley aii'tbiwayt,fRgnton%wA S 1723059026 Department of Transportation !State of Washingto ;Oly�mpa�[l'A' R.0.W. Shari's Restaurant 1820 Maple Valley Hfg wp.;y;Re'n'ton,.W4A. 1723059132 4 . • • • • • • • ` • . • • NAME ADDRESS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL , NUMBER • • . . • • • • ' I 0661• NO.LN36 40,IJO Certification NOISIAIO`)NINN07d I, 1.../L7'i L• /3 e.?_, hereby certify that the att stasit -•.'.cent property owners and their addresses were taken from the records of the King Co '. f .,-ibed by law. ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a Notary :•V � �"s Pu ic, In and for the State'of Washin t,�on residing at ' Pt suo : , 5 //71-eAl on the i, ' day of . • el N �•„y_; 9 ,�9M.��0,: • —Gvl• ��� O I SNs • • • • >::::>: ><::>:::::;>::::::::;:;::>:.::.::•::.::•;»:::.;:.:•::.>:.;:.:>:.:>:.;:.;;:.;:.; r.:offlce: se;. nl I A I • :::>:>: :::;:>::: :: : : ::: :�:>:: <; :::::: :::::<:::::<::::::<: <::::::: ::: :: :::::::::::::>::::::::>:::::: :::::;::::::::>::::::>::>:<:::;::>::>:>�::: ::::::�»»::::::':•::: .ern.:..... key..:::::: ,�:::<::�::::>;: .:. .... ::::::.••herebycertify.;::tf�at:::notices:::;of::: •:-p�bt> et•�g';::on.;the;;; • ;: o.;:....... ... isle.::... .......... ::: •.::::.:�.;::,; :'...<`�• .��":::> .: ::d`I`�:� • ;::>:�::;to:::�ac.h;alsted;:::ad acent;; • .:#?....p..::Y...o�+.::ar..as;:Rrescr.bed::..b.:iaw�;::::?:::::::::.::::..:::.....::.:::.:.:::...•:::::..:::::..:..:: .:......:,.:......::.:::.•:::..::...::.:::::::..:....:::::::.::::::::::::::.::.: • • • Tl' ST Subscribed and sworn to before .>: � ��a vtary public, to an #vr the Stat of .•.:..:.:.:.. • . .. . :. :.: •. ::.::::... • .. . on.::he,.:.% .!day,o#:::. . :::::�' !�.,.:.>:.:.;>;:.::;•:.;:.:;.:>; :;:<::::::::::::::<;..::;::.>;....:<�:.::;::.;..:.•>:.>;.;:.....::;:.>::.:::.>:.»;:•:.:;:<.;;:.:: :;:.;:.;:.>::::: in • O i(!• •c� NOTARY : Rev 5/90 �` Pu _ suc : 2: CERTIFIC.doc Z N� 9b ,`OBI ,r-_:°t NOTICE OF PENDING SITE PLAN APPROVAL RENTON,WASHINGTON A Site Plan Application has been filed and accepted with the Development Services Division of the City of Renton. The following briefly describes the application and the necessary Public Approvals. DESCRIPTION: Cedar River Park Shop Improvement ECF;SA-072-90 Applicant seeks approval to convert the old Taco Time building into a functional parks maintenance building and to construct a storage shed, construct an outdoor day-care area and enlarge the parking area. GENERAL LOCATION: 1911 Maple Valley Highway PUBLIC APPROVALS: Environmental Review Site Plan Approval Building Permit The application can be reviewed in the Development Services Division located on the third floor of Renton City Hall. Comments will be accepted anytime prior to Public Hearings, during Public Hearings, or prior to an administrative site plan approval. For further information on the application or dates of final action by the City, please contact the Development Services Division, at 235-2550. -__ - - -- ------- ------- - - \ 0 0[ 1, /)) • LI . — 9 1 0 I n 47# . _ 1 1 ,, _ nu / '\._:. , , 0 . , _ ; / j ri , _ . E , /// , .\ Vii / \ csrF r�rrT I a rr i c--- I I: /// 2 i___ 0 L-:_i - /71 •, .S\\., LI U J ,„))— 0 , , / '. .s ''' \\ 4 '-- . 6 Ci I/ / I 1 ' c] ‘C/)f// \ '\, \\''.,‘. , 1 1-1_1 1 I i ,i// U X r. /ter / SToCy ..5�{'Ic>S c p ,S 19K , / ,/,'/,, 7,,, •, Y \am .J ri�xr I '°' \\ f-i1Qea n \ crry l / .5ron {Ar �P-1712LGRWE-,GO, \. JUL. Cam _ d PoNb \'�. I I • '7 ❑ o,fN1 • PO NI, \ P\12' —' MON TY M7 1/ .-f) \ b-IZ-90 ram. OF RE 11/ OZ U \% © 21' 9,0 .a. ' NOTICE 91 o SEPt EMO�P OF PENDING • SITE PLAN APPLICATION DESCRIPTION : CEDAR RIVER PARK SHOP IMPROVEMENT ECF;SA-072-90 • APPLICANT SEEKS APPROVAL TO CONVERT THE OLD TACO TIME • BUILDING INTO A FUNCTIONAL PARKS MAINTENANCE BUILDING AND TO CONSTRUCT A STORAGE SHED, CONSTRUCT AN OUTDOOR DAY • - CARE AREA AND ENLARGE THE PARKING AREA. GENERAL LOCATION AND/OR ADDRESS: 1911 MAPLE VALLEY HIGHWAY 477,�f �� PUBLIC APPROVALS REQUIRED : • ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW SITE PLAN APPROVAL BUILDING PERMIT . PUBLIC COMMENTS WILL BE RECEIVED BY THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT .ANYTIME PRIOR TO PUBLIC HEARINGS AND DURING PUBLIC HEARINGS. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CALL THE CITY OF RENTON _ BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT 235-2550 THIS NOTICE NOT TO BE REMOVED . WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION • CERTIFICATION_ I , ,,4 , -H EREBY CERTIFY THAT 3COPIES OF THE ABOVE DOCUMEN WERE POSTED BY ME IN 3 CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON OR NEARBY THE DESCRIBED PROPERTY ON /�j/• • KET J.P �* ATTEST: Subscr'bed and sworn to before me, a it �?Qg.ON�.•G.00. � Notary Public, in and for t e State of Washin itr, 4%p % residin "n , on the: v tl(F IN'fE '• day of IO r e , PUBLIC :• Z• • OF RF :. oq NOTICE 9Tf0 SEPTEMe�Pe OF PENDING SITE PLAN APPLICATION DESCRIPTION : CEDAR RIVER PARK SHOP IMPROVEMENT ECF;SA-072-90 APPLICANT SEEKS APPROVAL TO CONVERT THE OLD TACO TIME BUILDING INTO A FUNCTIONAL PARKS MAINTENANCE BUILDING AND TO CONSTRUCT A STORAGE SHED, CONSTRUCT AN OUTDOOR DAY- CARE AREA AND ENLARGE THE PARKING AREA. GENERAL LOCATION AND/OR ADDRESS: 1911 MAPLE VALLEY HIGHWAY PUBLIC APPROVALS REQUIRED : ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW SITE PLAN APPROVAL BUILDING PERMIT PUBLIC COMMENTS WILL BE RECEIVED BY THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT .ANYTIME PRIOR TO PUBLIC HEARINGS AND DURING PUBLIC HEARINGS. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CALL THE CITY OF RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT. 235-2550 THIS NOTICE NOT TO BE REMOVED WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION ... .......................................................................: • �o August 8, 1990 To: Lynn Guttmann, Planning/Building/Public Works Administrator Jim Hanson, Development Services Manager Jay Covington, Executive Assistant to Mayor John Webley, Community Services Administrator Ron Nelson, Building Official Glen Gordon, Fire Marshal From: Don rickson, Secretary ee Date..................Au . e • Agenda attached below. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA AUGUST 8, 1990 Third Floor Conference Room Commencing at 10:00 AM TIME/KEY PARTICIPANTS NEW HEATHERROSE PRELIMINARY PLAT ECF;PP-071-90 Applicant seeks.to subdivide a 3.34 acre property, zoned R-1 into 14 parcels for future single-family home development. The platting encompasses four discrete parcels, of which two have been previously subdivided; three single-family residences which now exist on the property (proposed Lots #12, #13, #14) are to be retained. CEDAR RIVER PARK, PARKS DEPT. .4E-,CFr SWEVr2,9:0j Applicant seeks approval to convert the old Taco Time building into a functional park maintenance building and to construct a storage shed, construct an outdoor day- care area and enlarge the parking lot. VALLEY GARDEN HEALTH CENTER ECF;R-056-90 A change of zone from Public Zone (P-1) and R-3 Residential Zone to Office Park (O-P). RECONSIDERATION SOUTHGATE OFFICE PARK, PHASES II/III ECF;SA-068-90 Applicant seeks to obtain site plan approval for Phase II which includes a five-story office building including parking, landscaping and recreational amenities on a 20.06 acre site. Existing land use consist of a three-story office building, landscaping and parking. The project site is zoned for Office Park use. ( . , • .':'';' • ----- : :::::::.:::::*;.::: :•::::i:;:i:::::::*i:ii......:::•:::::••.::::::::::::::::i:::::•:•:•:::::::::•:::•:::::::::::•:•:•:••......:•:*:•:•:• •:•:•:•.:•;:if.):::::•::•:::::•:•:•:•:::•:•:•:•:•:•:•?.....:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:::•:..*:•:•:•:•:•••:.•........i..............::::.:_,.....:....•:..................:.....::::........r............:::::::::::.:::::..,.....,„...:.;:„...:„.......:::„............,...;!:,.....!;:ii::::::::;::;:,;:.:::::::::.::::.....:.:::::.: ::.:.................:::::::::::::::::6::::::: ::::::MbEti:Ati:TIVIENVO.V..:::.:PLANNIN:GI,g01LtiN.G./.0,(1:14..iZIO:::WOFt.kii?::::.::.::::.::::.::i.:::.::.::.::?::::f::::::.:::.::.: .:::::::::•:.....::::::::::::x.R.::::::::::::::::iiii::::::::::::::: :::.iiiii ::::....ii:ENVIRONMENTAL.13EVIE811.i.Ccimlyjiiiii.v,: i.:iiii::::mii...iii:.:::::::::ai ::::::ii: ::::.iii *:.:::::::.:,......:m* ............................................................... ............. .......... .. ..... .... ..... . ...... ... .... .......................................................................................... ::::::::::::.i:s.:::::M:i:::::::::::.:::::::::•:.g:::: :::::::•::::::: :.:.:MM:::::.::: ::;:..*::: ::::M.:M:•:.M.::::•,..":.STAF.E.,..R...E.P.O..:FI-37...iigii.i:.::. .,.:::.;i:: :gi....1:.%:..:.%:.' il::::.::- ...:::.::iii:::: :..i.i.i.i.i',.:::::.:.:.':.:::i::::X.::•::::.J.i.i.:E::::::::in;::::.:•:::::::::::.**;:::: ............... ............................................................ .. ............ ... ...... . .. . ............................................................................................................................. •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. ':..:::::.:::::.:::.::: :•.:•.::.:..:•. ... .:*:.:*:.::•. ;:.*:....:•. : :::....:•.:g:.R:::.:.*:.:: i:•. .:•.M•.: ...:•.:. .:•..•.':..•.:•..•::..•:•..•.m.:::..•.*:..•. Atig.ug:t:•..•.:EF:19g.la::i::::::::::..f.:::::::::::::i::.:::.::i:ioi:i:...:,.*.•.::.:if•.::::.:io:.::.:x:.:::.:::;..:::::::::::•.:::::::•.:..:•.:::::::-.:::::::::•.:•.:::::::::::•.:-.:: ••.•.•••••••••••••...•••••.•••„•.•••.•••••.•.•...•••••.„...•.•...•.....•.•.....•...•.....•.•.•.•.•...•.•.•...•...•.•...............•.......•...•.•...•....... ..............•.....•........•.•...•.•...•......•...•....•.•...•..•.•......••••.•..........................,............•.........•.•.........•.....•...........„........... ...................................................................................................... ...................................,...,.................,................................ .....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................,.................................... ••••••.:.................::::::::::•••. ...... ..:.:- ..„...:.,:...."...........,..L::::::•....:::::::.•::::::::::::::::•:::::::.::::.::::::*:.*:.....:::::::::.*:...::::*::.:.:::::::::::.:.::::::.:.:::::•::::::::::::::.::::.:::::**i:.:::::::: ::.:::.: ::::::.::.:.:?:*:*i.:::.:::.:.: : ::.::.:ii-:*:.*:::::....*:?::........:*:.:iil......*::.:.:iii...::::.::::•&:::.:iii...::Aii! Al::;•::•:..:::::.::::•fflo!,sc.:;Kc411c4u.rgu:;:::a.:•.: .:•::.:•ig.:.iii:: .. .:•6.::.miim..::::•i::.:.:•i::.:E.:::... i:,i.:::a:• .:•.mm.:•,.::.: i; :::::::g:::i::::::.;:m.:.:•:.:::.:::::i::.::::..:.:.:::.:::.:::..:•:::.::::.::.;:.:m.::::.: ...::::•:::::::•:::::::•::•::•:i::•:iii, ........................................................................................................................................ ..... ... . .. ... ................................. ..............................................2i......... .......,......................................................................................................................1...................................................................................................:............................„:„.....„:„...............................................................:. :Ap..v.t....teANT...i .::::::.0.: :.:::::::':: ii.::a:: :::::::::::: M:::::::.:• .::::: :.g.::::;ecti.s.•:ofi.POI.Oh:;1?..ark$.,:..a......B001-0tiow.m.. .:.....:.!..0... . ...:.......g...,........ ......iiii:....:....iilli ........................................................................................................................................................... ......... . ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... .::::.......:ii.:.i.... ...ii ....H...:.t?..roici .::::.g:i.:.::i.:::::::::::::::....i.:-... t.aiii .:::: :::::::.:,. .s.........::.n.m ......g.::.:.....:codat..'.:::iliq6f..:.P4(..k.,.ShOWIMitieo.:(.0motAti::.::::.*:.*:.::.::.::.::......::.*i::.*:.::...:.::::.::,*:.::.::.11(, ......................................„.... ................................................ ...... .. . ............ .........................,..........„.............„...„....„....„.....................,.. .?::::::::::::::•.::::,•::::::::.::::: ::::,•:c,gNVOOOMgOrA:0:: HOggiOit.:.$]:::EMPP....;::::SX-0 ....§6::::::::R:HiRiai....in.W..ii...::..R;:: E:: :.:: :...N:...:11j,, .::.:::::::::,......:•:::::::::::::::: :::.:....:::.:::.:.:-.......................::::.:-..?:....... .............,..,...... ....::: :............:,.........::::......:::...::::::::::*:.: ::::::.: :i:::::.::::.:.:.:.:;.*:::::.::::::*i::::.::.:*.:..x::*:.:::::::::::.*:::.*iii:i:i::: :::::.:;i:::::....*mixf..,.....iii: :;:;a: ::.::::.*i*:.*::::::.*:.::.*:.:i*:,:;*...*:.*:.:...:N s.:.i......:::::::::is.:.:::::.:....,.:&:::::iiio.E•SCRIPTIO8PNAUF:•P!ROP.OSAU,...:•:.:;:•::.*:•::.:.::::;.::.::•::•::.:::::.*.:Applic.ari.t:.:s.p.eks,:.appr.oyal40.::p.ony:OfilliOi•Olfefi.':tacciAlrog!.i: . ..••••:::::::::.:::j:::.:.:::::::::.*::::::::::ng:::: : :.:. .....::,. .. ...n:::: :..E.:::.0.::in:::.....,...... .igNi.:::::::M:-..:.:::::R.6(iii.diiiititd::::::.W.::filtis-dtii5rialtiai'sk:•:::::.fii.gliitefiiie6:.....btlildirigt. ""•""•"""•••"""""""•"•.""."--"••""••"".•""".••"".•••"".•"• --- " ••• ." -"" •••• - - ....• e ............................."."e....."e"....."....."'";........ "- .::..:P.:•:.?....:::::.:::::..0:::?... . .0...::.?H':..e..ii.:.:i.::.iii.•.•::.M.::.::.:::0.•:::::..:::::Migiii:.i...:::.::::::::::::::: :::g:ii:.UggAfiditY....cii.httilot.....aittorao:.8hOti:i::::.dbfigtt.ifdt.i:ani:outoloor .................:....:...:.......::::: ::.:....:... :..:..........:...........i..,......:...,.......:...:?:.:...:.:.::::.....i:,...:.:...:::........,..........,:::......:::...*:.:..*...f.........i:-..::::.::: ::::::.::::::::.:i:i.:* s.:.,•::::.:.:.:.:•::::.:.:•:.a.::.:::::•::::::?:::•?::.:iiiiiii:Mi.: 0:.:•:.::::. ... ..:...:•:.:.0.:Miia,.:at. ir.s....:•:.:.:. ..:?::as•:.:..0 ::::i.:•oay..: 6ie:•gi'..6g:..Ofid:....eff14f.d0....tFip...:04!..kfrig,..16ti....'..:....::::....: :..:::::::::::::.0....:.:.:.i:::::::•iiiii. ::::::::.......i:::*:::: : :..... ...: ::n: :::::.:::: ::::.::::.::::n::::.: :.......: :.<.... ..D...:.::...:...R:n: i.:: :::...*:.: : :::•ff:.........:::.......::::: ::•.:...:.:::: *...:::: :..... ....::::.::::: : ::.*.:: :::,:::::.::::::.:.:::::.:::::::::,:::........:::::3...:n.::: ::.:•:*......i.: : :K::•: :.?...:,: :...: : :T:i •:.:•:.:••••:•:.*::::•:.:.:X,.'....:.:.:•:.:..::.::::•::.,:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::.:.:.::::•:.:••:::::::::::.::::::•::::::::::::::;:::::::::::::.::::::.:Mnigii:ie:: :::•M ::: ::: ::::::0::ii.iiiiR::.::::Mr.::::: ::: :.:0 :: : :j.:.Eg.....Ma......,:in..::•M:. ...M.M......M11: L0.0gTON:::.O.P.:::.0.0.P0.$.Aj.2. .:iiii::: :::::::.....:::::::::::.:.:.......:::::g71[9:1164apl0.......V. Iley......(1.jgbyy4..:::::::mi:u.::::::::.:imo: ::::::::::::::::::.iiiiisa:.:::0.:.:::lli, :::.:::::::::::::::......:„::::::::•:::::,::::::::::::::::::::::::::•::::::.:::::::•::•:::::::::: *:•::::::::::::*::.:,::::::::::,:::::::::)::::::::::::.:::::::::::: ::.:::::::.:::::•::::::i:,:::*:::::;::::::„.::::::::.,::::::.:: ::::::::::.:::::::::::::.:::,::::::::::::::::. ;:i:i*.::::**::.:•::::::::::::::::::::::,::::,::::::::::::,:::::::;i::::::::.::::::::::::::::::::::k . . .-........ ....,. ..........:::::vz.: :::::...w............ aii.m..:i. 13SLJES.';:s.: *: ::::::•....*::::::.::::: :.:5.::: *....::::::::: ::::.::.::::::::*:.::,..::::::.*:.::.::.::::.::.::.::.::::::•*:.:. ..::•:::Nrattlitl..:::.::.:EtiVitorittibritP.'2ISIbi4bi.:::::::Lighti:r.::.aildi...••• Aesthetics,::::::::::::::.:::..:::::::::::.:::::::::•:::•:::::•:::::::::•:::::::::::.::::::.•:::::::: : :::::•:: :::::: : ::::::.*:.::::::::::::.::&•:::::::::K:::::: :::::.,:•••,.,..:•_•••:•••:•.:•••:•::_•••••••,••::::.:::::::,•,••••••••••••.:::;.•••••••::;.•:::•••••••.*:.::::::::::::::*:::::::::::.::.::: ::,::::.*:. ::::::: ::.:i:i:i:i.;,::::.::,:i:i:::::::::;:::::T: ::::::•:••••••••••••::::•:::::::::::::'...:•:::::::::niiii.:::::::::•a:::•iiiaRii:a•Kii....::::-:••••••:::::::::: :ff::::::eiiisRfg•::::::::::Glar.0..;..:.ROblid:.....Setvisiog..xii:.:.:a:::::Mii::.: :.: *:: ::.::: :.::.::.:x*:.::.:i*:...:...:...i::.*:.: :i:.:: :xiiili: ::::::::..:......•...:•,...:::::::.. .:-:::::::•••••••::.::..........:,:m:::.*: ...:•... .,e.. . ..,...:...........:....:•:::::....... ::.m.:-:::::::..: ::::::. ::::•:..::.0::::h....A:*:...::::.: ::.::::...,:... .:.:::.....:::,: ::::::::::.:.:•••: :::..:::.....:::.m. ,::.:•::::::::::: :........:.:::::::.,:mi..:.:miii.m.•:::::.:o..*:...g:::::...1::i. ...........i1:?,......L,.....: ..........:.:::..............*.:*•••:.:..... ..:.... ..*:.••••••••*•••••::::•.. : .....:....:.:::........::::::::.:::::::.:•••••::•::.::.:.:.:::•:::::,:::::•:::::::::::;•:::::::::;:::Z:: :::::::: :a;::::;:;i:;;:.:;::::;1: :T.:. ::::::::::::::::•:a:•:•::::::.:.:.::::::.:19pmmiNpA7FIgN .i......:::::::::::::.:R.........::::.:.:::::::::::.•:::::,....:.s.,..::::::::.::::.:N::::::::::. 100:::rgegrpmgpplii:ttvp:lh0:-.ERgil §pg.....:a::.:0ptprmjnO901. ..:.iili:....1::::::.:::EY:::::::. i.,.:ijiiiMigaii•giigiliii.::::a...1::::: :gigg.;::::i.F':iii:::11:8i:giiiin.;i:iiiiiiliiiii:,.i.0:::AN86:::i:.$.64iii6::861i....... 0iiid4fga:iwi6::::::::.iii-;:c.46i•j4ii4 page btitiditions.:(see.: :...2).:..i..:...:.::: :x::.:::.:.:i::...:.::...t.::... :::•:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::iii: ...... ............•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••..................••••...••••..•• • •••• •••• .••• •• • • • •••• ••••.•••••..............,..„..........................,.....•...,...,....,,,... ... ...... .................................................. • . \ '') I /I I , \-----T*Iit °20/ // • i ---- , r-- --.-- ----1-1 ' n 1 . I u 1 0 : ._ ru_ '" \____ / Q / . i L.,/ • ui / I_C j_l 0 --------r7 • I /1 • I ///' I L 1,tr .• I. • . j 1.:...--- Pr; 1 0 ; • ---- ' \ / 7// ••../'- --.'`. \• •., j-Lak 1's / ///// ,.. ,.>. '• •>-•,..:‘, „..‘ ' •:-- 1-,,,=••,..Lirtr : I 1 1 rill i"— • Oi ,///'/ ' • • ••• • : 1 — . '..--'=-- -I. ;. ----- -- ir. 1 _1_ i, 7, //' ''/ // .1, ,. s. • . . '• .•..:',. 1 j _ : 0 1 iii L. 0 I. , s. \• -CI? .?-:„.__1' --1 lJ :‘ 1 ri- ./ • : \ L.E.4 / .,, \ \\. .\. \'''.. .' le 1 N/ Li IL j1 III ! = lit ,/ , I 1 cf , ,,- ,, ,.. , 1 . o /\.< \% •- 4- ," • -' , ,,, r •,-_-_/,:-.1. . ,,,.., -.. _ 12AK.- ' -- ' /',- '''' ' , „ •J \..A, _.,., , , _----- , ,, ... .,- . \ Nt_-_•(. -I.1., f ] . .re,,, , \.. • . •7 C) ,t,,,er \ V e ------ - ------______, -. .. s‘ \\ ..\\, I ' .,\•,, ( • t":) Environmental Review Committee Staff Report Cedar River Park Shop Improvements August 8, 1990 Page 2 • • • Natural Environment • • 1) This project is located within the Aquifer Protection Area. Therefor. no pesticides, herbicides or other hazardous materials shall be stored on the premises without resubmittal with a hazardous ' material handling plan including provisions for secondary containment, handling, and spill mitigation. This is to help ensure that this development does not adversely impact the aquifer. • :ES • • The applicant is planning to convert an existing building and to construct a 40 by 180 foot shed, an outdoor J, day-care area and to enlarge the parking area within the Cedar River Park. These changes will allow the Parks and Recreation Division to provide the level of service required at the Community Center and meet the demands placed on the Cedar River Park. • The Park is located within the Aquifer Protection Area. In order to ensure the protection of the ground water, the Parks and Recreation Division has agreed not to store pesticides, herbicides or other materials in the shed that could impact the aquifer. IVVI130IVIVIEN7ALELE:MEN..:S, a. Aesthetics/Land Use Impacts: The proposed development consists of converting the Taco Time office building into a park maintenance building, an addition to the existing parking area, construction of a storage shed and construction of an outdoor day-care play area. • • The addition to the parking area will provide an area for 37 standard parking stalls and 14 compact parking stalls. The storage shed will be approximately 180 ft. by 40 ft. The outdoor day-care play area will be adjacent to the Recreation Center and will cover approximately 900 sq. ft. with a three-foot high concrete wall surrounding the area. The new shed will be open on all sides with the roof supported by poles. The roof will be .constructed of green sheet metal to match the existing buildings. • The Cedar River Park is already well landscaped. The only additional landscaping that will • be provided in conjunction with this project is the proposed landscape buffer around the new parking area. Mitigation Measures: The landscaping plan submitted by the applicant will adequately • buffer the proposed new parking area. The existing landscaping on site will buffer.the proposed additions to the park maintenance area and the Recreation Center. Policy Nexus: Parking and Loading Ordinance 4-14, Landscape Requirements 4-32-34. '1 b. Natural Environment• Impacts: All of the proposed development and the activities associated with the proposed development are located beyond the 200 foot shoreline setback from the Cedar River. A portion of the existing park including the Carco Theatre is located within the 200 foot !„•. shoreline setback area. As the project site is fairly level only minor grading will be Necessary for the proposed development. , The project is located within the Aquifer Protection Area, Zone I. Due to the unique concerns of this area the applicant has agreed not to store pesticides, herbicides or other chemicals on the project site. The shed area will only be used to store vehicles and hand tools. • . Mitigation Measures: The proposed development will maintain the 200 foot shoreline setback from the Cedar River. The applicant will not be storing pesticides or other chemicals on the project site. Policy Nexus: Environmental Review Ordinance 4-6 Environmental Review Commi:- Staff Report Cedar River Park Shop Improvements August 8, 1990 Page 3 c. Noise, Light and Glare Impacts: 1) Construction: Noise, light and glare are potential impacts in conjunction with the construction of the parking lot and shed. Due to the,nature of the surrounding uses, heavy industry and commercial, and the distance from the project site to the adjacent uses these impacts are expected to be minimal. Some mitigation of these impacts will be achieved through the limiting of construction to normal business hours and due to the existing landscaping. 2) Operations: During the operation of the park facilities some noise, light and glare will be generated from the security lighting and the general use of the facilities. These impacts should prove to be minor due to the nature of the surrounding area and its use. No new light sources will be required as part of the new development. Mitigation will be achieved through the addition landscaping proposed by the applicant and the existing landscape features. Mitigation Measures: The proposed and existing landscaping will buffer the surrounding land uses from glare produced by the park. Policy Nexus: Landscape Requirements 4-31-34, Comprehensive Plan Section III.C. d. Public Services 1) Police and Fire Impacts: Police and Fire Prevention Bureau staff report adequate resources to provide anticipated services to the site during construction activities and during operation with the Code-required improvements (e.g. 20 foot wide fire lanes, fire hydrants. Mitigation Measures: None required. Policy Nexus: Environmental Review Ordinance 4-6. 2) Storm Water Impacts: This project is within a Zone I Aquifer Recharge Area. In order to ensure the protection of the aquifer mitigation measures will be required in conjunction with the construction and operation of the project. The Parks and Recreation Department has indicated that trucks containing hazardous materials will not be stored in the shed. Mitigation Measures: The applicant will need to provide plans showing the new drainage system with slopes, catch basins, oil/water separator and piping on the south/east sides of the proposed building. These plans shall also demonstrate the connection between the existing system and the new system. Policy Nexus: Environmental Review Ordinance 4-6 • 3) Utilities Impacts: Public utility lines are generally available to serve the site. There is a concern on the part of the Utilities Division that the proposed structure encroaches over an existing 42" Metro trunk line. Parks and Recreation has indicated that they are aware of the easement and that the proposed shed will not encroach within the easement. Mitigation Measures: At the time of construction the necessary survey will be completed to ensure that the building does not encroach into the easement for the 42" Metro trunk line. • • Environmental Review Committee Staff Report Cedar River Park Shop Improvements August 8, 1990 • Page 4 Policy Nexus: Environmental Review Ordinance 4-6 • .:: ..... .. • • • • • • • :>::;::O.IIIIIVI.ENTS �.F:RSV:IE:W'INGD�P�?►R:T�rVI.EN...S.........:...::::::.:•::::::::•:::::::................:...:.�.:�:..::::: is E�> � .:::C.......::..::.::::::::::.::::..:::::.:::.::::::::::::::::::.::...............::.:.::::.:.::::..::.�:..::.•.�..::..::..::...:.:...........::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::.::..........:::::: ::»:::: ::;:<: >V ri us�:�Cit. ::: a artments;have::re..viewed:::and;:.comm�nted:;upot�:;ttepC.p ec.:,.•.:.,,,,e.,e,,;:o,,,:..:.::..:;;:$;_ ' l 1 • • . t • tr. WO.R.KS::i: i:<i.... ' :::::`:: fto ::::::: :� < <>::>: > :::b EP . . T N: <:: ��.F::: .: <��. .N . I N'G��:.B•U.l I N.��.: '.U.................:.. ......................... ..........: • :::::.:T.:::G.�-i Ni�AL:::::::::::1..5.:.::I�Y.:C...::::.:I�.:TT:::::::::::::::::.�.::.:•:::::;::.:.:.:::.::.;.:.;::.::::.:::: STAE O ::::<: :.D:r::':::i ::::::i`:::::::W'::: ::::i:::::i: : >: ' <:: :< ?� > : <�: : i` isi ` O:::: : cr at r : > >> " : ::....::::: ::>:>. F?. :L •�AN::�:: :�»::::>:�:::::: ::::>:: ::<:::>:::� :::::::>>: <>: :<::::�:.�:it. o::Fienfop;P�a.k;�&Re..r. a.I. ......... ............... ..... ...:.:... IL ':.:::;�.R...Q.�i.ACT,•:::•:::::::::::::::'::::::::.:::::::.::.�::::::::::::::::::::::� ..:.a..r..::::Vie.::�.a::.�:�h..:P:i.::.P::0::�m..,n..s.::::::.:�.:::::::::::::::::::.: :: :::`A`..:`'..i.:`': i::i:i:i: > i:i: is i:i:i:::i:<i: isi isisi i : >:is i:i:<::i:i: >i>:.::.:>:: ii': ..tN..IRO�I.MeN.A. .��+..0....1$Y. .. . .. .... ECFk.S:::t►..:2W:::::::: :;.'; '::.;'::::. :::::::::::::.:::::::::.;'.:::::::::.� :•::.:1 :ti?I)'��•. •:•"':•I 71•:•j:,:f :}v::�•: { ::i: ti:{}:•iti�?:F, .•'f..':•I•'•H::: O I O O r[' ''ks'a r a v a me.... : ::::::::::::::::::p :49RIP�I:(�N``Of::pP�Pp:O§.A.,.......:............A can...sOe........P :::::::.: :::G:.n... .:::::.h�:...d::.. .... T:...:..... 1.10 .ii60:;a::fm tivrlal:::: arks::41.6.0tenance::;l�ujl0.i.00 `��� �r'et::'n.ou do o.: �`::> anst u:::::::�>:�::::::�>:�::: :::::�::::::�::::::::::::�:::::::::�:�:::::: <�::�::<::�:::::�:: :::::::;:::::�:::: <::::: �::::> �����:::�:::::�::: d:to''co r s e G ... ... . ...a..... . . .. . .t`.. ::. :..king:are:;:>:::::::::<::::::<::::::: :::III � • r: a: nd .:`:. ..;e: r a ::day:�.car.e.: . a: . .9.:::.*:h::P.:.•::.•: ..*::..::.�..�:.:.:.•: :.:•: .:• ::::''HI a :III :>::::::::::::: `...O.C:`T ���N'� .`f?.�CAR�>�SA ... . 9 . I.e...a(I . .... h... ....'<��:� `: :::"::" '::.:: :.:.:.:::.:.::::•::. 1) \- o ° p� „r///+ I0! K) 7/ , 04' • . C\\\\\ ../„. ..--- -----__-. ' C -HO -if' - ' T_Ts- ri [71 ' \ / ci'•„, ,z . . • _ I {J 0 DI ' E] f • E of , U 0_ a d ril,--,.-. 1 ' DO a ,` •`I '., / - \ . I v,r7</L1JI I�d l�� � Q O CWAK lV ` P . . ,g, C. m. � ' • \NF , . / / \ \‘„, • ,, _ _...,‘ ___ II°.J -' L'"Nr ( V \ PLAN! / \ \ CRY .....". ,, , ..,., , . .....‘ . .. , ,.......... .... .„ _ __.... .... . , . ,, \_, ... ._ .... • ,_ . , o ‘ n l / ``y on r �nr�v... 6rave�co, �\ JUL C�, .•-f t::(. . •�� I� v,,Ni / ./ VeR .2LVICI NITY riAP s , Al I za \\\\ • • 'technical Advisory Committee Staff Report • • Cedar River Park Shop Improvement • August 3, 1990 Page 2 • • a LAND USE • li. Whether the proposed project is consistent with the Comprehensive plan zoning designation • and with Goals, Policies and Objectives set forth in the Plan. • The proposed development is consistent•with the Comprehensive Plan Map, which designates the • site for Recreation uses and with the Comprehensive Plan Elements for Parks and Recreation. . 2. Whether the proposed project Is consistent with the land use map.zoning designation and • applicable Zoning Ordinance components. The subject property is zoned Public Zone (P-1), which permits municipal parks and there accessory uses. The proposed development adequately addresses the development standards for park facilities. • 3. Whether the proposes project is consistent with the Zoning Ordinance and other applicable regulations/standards. • The land to the west of the project site is reserved for the 1-405 freeway,the property to the north is zoned for Business District (B-1),to the east is zoned•Heavy Industry District (H-1) and to the south is zoned Public Zone (P-1). • The project as proposed adequately addresses the development standards regarding the adjacen• t zones. • ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS • 1. Whether the applicant has adequately Identified and addressed the following environmental impacts likely to occur in conjunction with the proposed development. a. Aesthetics/Land Use • • Impacts: The proposed development consists of converting the Taco Time office building into a park maintenance building, an addition to the existing parking area, construction o• f a storage shed and construction of an outdoor day-care play area. • The addition to the parking area will provide an area for 37 standard parking stalls and 14 compact parking stalls. The storage shed will be approximately 180 ft. by 40 ft. The outdoor day-care play area will be adjacent to the Recreation Center and will cover • • • ' approximately 900 sq.ft.with a three-foot high concrete wall surrounding the area. The Cedar River Park Is already well landscaped. The only additional landscaping that will be provided in conjunction with this project is the proposed landscape buffer around the • new parking area. . I' • • Mitigation Measures: The landscaping plan submitted by the applicant will adequately buffer the proposed new parking area. The existing landscaping on site will buffer the . proposed additions to the park maintenance area and the Recreation Center. • Policy Nexus:, Parking and Loading Ordinance 4-14, Landscape Requirements 4-32-34. b. Natural Environment Impacts: All of the proposed development is located beyond the 200 foot shoreline setback from the Cedar River. As the project site is fairly level only minor grading will be necessary for the proposed development.• The project is located within the Aquifer Protection Area, Zone I. Due to the unique -concerns of this area the applicant has agreed not to store pesticides, herbicides or other chemicals on the project site. The shed area will only be Used to store vehicles and hand . tools.. Mitigation Measures: The proposed development will maintain the 200 foot shoreline • setback from the Cedar River. The applicant will not be storing pesticides or other • chemicals on the project site that could impact the aquifer. • • V . . Tedhnical Advisory Committee Staff Report Cedar River Park Shop Improvement August 3, 1990 Page 3 Policy Nexus: Environmental Review Ordinance 4-6 c. Noise, Light and Glare Impacts: 1) Construction: Noise, light and glare are potential Impacts in conjunction with the construction of the parking lot and shed. Due to the nature of the surrounding uses, heavy Industry and commercial, and the distance from the project site to the adjacent uses these Impacts are expected to be minimal. Some mitigation of these impacts will be achieved through the limiting of construction to normal business hours and due to the existing landscaping. 2) Operations: • During the operation of the park facilities some noise, light and glare will be generated from the security lighting and the general use of the facilities. These impacts should prove to be minor due to the nature of the surrounding area and its use. Mitigation will be achieved through the addition landscaping proposed by the applicant and the existing landscape features. Policy Nexus: Landscape Requirements 4-31-34, Comprehensive Plan Section • III.C. d. Public Services 1) Recreation Impact: The Parks and Recreation Division of the Community Services Department has indicated that these facilities are needed in order to meet the requirements placed on the Cedar River Park and the Recreation Center. Mitigation Measures: None required. Policy Nexus: Environmental Review Ordinance 4-6 2) Police and Fire • Impacts: Police and Fire Prevention Bureau staff report adequate resources to provide anticipated services to the site during construction activities and during operation with the Code-required Improvements (e.g. 20 foot wide fire lanes, fire hydrants. Mitigation Measures: None required. Policy Nexus: Environmental Review Ordinance 4-6. 3) Storm Water Impacts: This project is within a Zone I Aquifer Recharge Area. In order to ensure the protection of the aquifer mitigation measures will be required in conjunction with the construction and operation of the project. Mitigation Measures: The applicant will need to provide plans showing the new drainage system with slopes, catch basins, oil/water separator and piping on the south/east sides of the proposed building. These plans shall also demonstrate the connection between the existing system and the new system. Policy Nexus: Environmental Review Ordinance 4-6 4) Utilities Impacts: Public utility lines are generally available to serve the site. There is a concern on the part of the Utilities Division that the. proposed structure encroaches over an existing over an existing 42" Metro trunk line. Parks and Recreation has indicated that they are aware of the easement and that the proposed shed will not encroach within the easement. V.. . I . • Technical Advisory Committee Staff Report . Cedar River Park Shop Improvement • • August 3, 1990 • Page 4 • • Mitigation Measures: At the time of construction the necessary survey will be completed to ensure that the building does not encroach into the easement for the 42"Metro trunk line. • • . Policy Nexus: Environmental Review Ordinance 4-6 Various City deperments have reviewed and commented upon the project These commentsg 1 ra,attaelyd • . . • 1,1 I: • . • • • .1 • • • • ; • • • • • • • • • • • • • I • -!.r • - • • • • • ..7.• • „. . • ,--, --- ,.-„-- ••••••• ...•••• . .,,......."%, e . • •••••••••••••••••••••••-••••••••:::: . 1.• - 1 .........,..x....:::••••••••::::::;::::i:: :::: :::•.::%•:%..iiiks:. *:.::::::::::.:::::.::.::::::: ::::::.::*•:::::: ,,,, ...............,....::::::.:•::-::::::::•:::•::::14G1pUll.......:....::::::::::::::.:::::::::::::::.::::...:::::::::::::::.:::::::::::::::.„:::::::::::::.::::::.1 • `-, :f:::...•...:...•.,:..:::•:::::•::::.::::::•::.:::::-::.:-::::::•:::::i•.:...:..•:,:i•:,:i•4:::::."::•-,:•,.::Q:.:•::::.:••:•1•:::,•:..•:.,:..•...:•,.:.„•:.:•:.•:.•:.•:.•:..•:.•:•.:•.:.:•....:•.•.,::•...:::•.A.:•.:•::••::•:::::::::::::•:::.;:.:::::-::::•::•••::•:::.„::::,:::::::::i:•:•:v,::,::...:::.::::::i:::.:::::n•.-.!••.••.•.••..k.t.•.:::i/•.:.G-•..••;,r••:::::::-::.R ..:.•i„:.:::.::p:•::..:.::.:::,.L:..:•.::,:..,A..,:7::-:ADVISORY COMMITTEE.••.••••.•.•.:„4:: STAFF: gpo ••••.::••:•:::::.:.::,•::••:•:•.„:••.:•...::••:::.::::::.:•:•::••.::•:.::.:•:::.:•••:::•::.•:::••::.:.::•:::::::::•::::::::::::•::':•:•:.::::::::::::::•:::••:::•-:„:•::•:-:::::::.:::•:::••:•:••,*::•::•::::•:::••:::•.:*:::-:.:.•..••:::•:::••::•::•:•::::•:::':::•::••::•:::••:::.••:::••*::::::•::::•:::•:::::::::.:::::::::•:•:•:::••:••::•••:„:••:•:::::::::."•::::::-::::„::::::.::•::,:•:•::•::::•:,:••*•:•::-:„•:,••:•::':•:::::::::•::::::::::•::::::.::•:::.*::::::::::::•::::•••:::•:::••::::.:::::::::::.::::•:::.•:::::•::::::::::::::::::::•:::•::::::*:::::::::.:::..*:::::.•::••:•::•:::::::::::::::::••::::• 40 August..J.:::::::: :::::::.:.Q.:::::::::•:::•:::•:::::::•:-::::•:::::::: ::::•::::g:: :::•::::::::::: : :::-:::•::mmi:::::•E:im:•:::•::::•::::•: :::`.?i i::::::•::::::•:::::•:':::::::•:::::::*:.:.:.:........... ..........:::::....:.... ...i:::: : :::::::.:::.:.......:•••••:...,:...:•:.......,......::.:.::::.:.:::::.:::.:::::.*:.:::::-..:::.:.::::::::::.::::::ff.i..i:::::: :.:::::::::••.•::::::•••••• • :::::::::.:::::::::ii:::::::::::::::::.::::::::::::::::::::::::*::?.:::::::::::::::.:::::.::::.::::i*:::::::::••:::::::::::::.........::. - ................:..:.............::-........................:..........:.•:•••••••••1.........••••••••••....... ....,..%,,Y,....-...,,,,%,--.-., _,...%,.%%,..v..\..,,,, -,...,Y,.....,• .• •••.••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••.••••••••••••••••••••••••......... •' - •• ••••••••-••• •••••••••••••-••••'••• •••••••••••••••••••••• •••••'' •••.•........•...• ..••............... •••• ••••••.•••.• ••• •• .. .. ... .• ... .. .• ...... •• .. ....••... .. ...... .. ...... ....“,,,':.,...:.-.,....,,,..,..,,.......-;...,..,,.,,•Y.•,-,,•,-,:..,...y..v,...,.,-.,..,,.. ••• ................................•••••••••••••................................................,........................:...............................................,.............„ ",“.,•,....,...:,,,,,,.,..,...Y.,,-.,..,...,,-,-.,..,,,.,..,..,Y...,...,%W..%,,,,...,...,.,.,...- ••••••......•••••••:::••••••:::::*::::.::.•:.•••::...:.•:::::?...:::::....:::::::...................:.:::::.:::.:::::....5.::::::::::::.:::::::.............................:*?•?•••••:;•:;.:..:*:.•:...........••••••••••••••••••••.:*:•••••••.:.......L..:.5.:?.......:::•:.:.:', ::::•:?.:.:.i..:**:••••••:.::*:•*......:::.•*i*......S..:?•:••••••••••.•••••••:.:.::::...:i. ...2••••••••••••,.......::.•, i: KtV..i...::•:::•:•:•••:•••:•::•:....:.•:.:',....:.••••••.*:.::••••••••••••••••••••••••••:.........::•••::::•:.:......:::.:•••••.;:::::•:....::?:•:•::.::.::: :•:•::•:......: ::.:::::::....:•.i...........ii...... k ':,V.Recreation . :•::•:•:'::,:::''..........:•:: :.:...:R:l..: ...:'..: ::'.....i.::::iiii RACK4nS?.',Y.' 77..: ::::.,:: :ii:R..:.:M:'..a :. .''.:..M•:'•. •. . Af44i':iTOt:!.ji::rff...::::.: :::::.:i:..::.:D:::as::.M:..:.:::.::.:.:.:::. iw:ft.:::::::::::::::.:::.:•::E:m::::.:.: : llii •:•.:A.:*;:.:Qe:::77.•:.: ::::::.*::::•:•::::: :::: :: ::: ::.:•:::•0:•::K.:::k:::::•:::•:::::•sm•:::E•::M; ;:•:•::••:::::MCk•j'••:7:::•:::::::-:.:::: ::::::::: ::: : ::::..L•:•:::.:::.:mi::::•:•:::g: ::::::: ::g466:10.::•::ft:::: :::•:•: a:•:•0: ::•:::::m ••••••••••••:::::::::::::::::.:::•:::.::mi:: : ::::::::::::::: ::::::.::::::::•:::::::::::::::::::: :: ::::i:: ::::::A: ::•:z:::::::::::::::?..:::: :.::::•::::1::...: ::::::•::::::::::.:•:::::-:::::::•::::: :,::::::.• •••8iriojb:•::.runpr.P:7:m::::::::::.:::.:m•::::: ::zi:.:•::::: : :::::::a::: ::iir.. is•••••••••••••:::::.::::.:::::•:•.:kl.P.:EskibA14:4:: ::::•:::::::::::: :••::::::•::•::•::•:::::::::::::.*:.:•:.••••••::•::•::::::•:•:in:::n:::::::::::::•:•::::::•:•:: -:-:::A ..:Aivert,.art:::•....:.:•::.:•.:::: ::::::ft•:::::::::::::::::::::*:::::::::::::.::::::::::::::::::•::::::m.::::::::.:•:::•:::•::?•:::: : :IT ...........„:•::::::::::: :: :•:......::...:.:.::.:....::::::::::„.:::::::•:::::::::::::.:.:::*:::::: ::::::::•::.:::::::::.:::::::::::•::::::: :::::::::•:::.:::::::::::::::.Qes..,,.,.:::.• .: ::::*:•:i*:,::::;:::::::::::::?:,:i:*:•::,:-...*::::.*:.:: **:,**i*•:::':::::'::: ::: ::.:5::::.::::.:0:::::::::::.::::::::::.*::*?:::::.:r: .,:...:•:.:::::.:::,:.:::::::R14(49.Tri*:: :: ::.i :::::::.::::::':::::::::'::::::.:.:::::*'::::::: ::::*:•:•:•••••.':0.: :::'..::ECF::::SA4):',:••••:•:...::::•••:•: :.:::,::::::::::•:,.-:.....,.........:.:.:.:::::.::::::::?.:::::::::::::':'::: .:::''•IdsT4Ca•:•-•11199iii: • -:.:•::::.::::•••••::.:::::..:•NM: :•••.:::: ::niii:::**:::::...',".:,.:.:::::•••...ce•.:::kEOK.VT; I:::*::::.:: ::U .: ••••:::::'::.:":."..-......;•••••••••••••••::::...:*:::::g•::::?::::::;:••••::::::::::A,••••• 1:.:10.:sconY. qi::-::::•:i.:•::::*••••••••••:g4:::.biliii019!"1, o s.::::::::::::::::::::::.:::::.6.:•::::::::::::.•:•;:goN•NAENT.:.: -...'•:: :::•:...:•.::...:::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::.:.:•:..... ...: :::::::::::::::....::•••••.?..?.*.::::gN.Y.it.r.::::.......:.::•::::,::::: ::,..::::::: :-..:::::: :::;.;::.::::::::: ....... ..p: .2:::::IiIiii...1.:.A..pi(i.:.p.::13130....Fp... ....!.....iiPoPiriy./:4:1....io......444::::10:::.........}p.....".....111t!.!.. 64...6foo§i:111 .........,...:::;::::::::::::........-616(:: ::::::.::::::.....,-.. A :::11to s......a.:::.ii............,..:......:.:.:.:::::-::.:::.:.h....H::::bonsr........:...::.:.::::::::::::::::::::.::::::::i:::::::..i„: .......:.:.:.:.:.:.........-:-:::::.4:...........:...::::::,...* :-.,:i.....:::::•.:.:...............;„.....E:pitkOP.. .N ..f.::.:.:::::::::::::.:::::•:::::::...:-...,:ltjtill'uin9:1-:...•.:...::::.:.::::.........:::.......: •totag.0...S:P .:::.....-.,:.:.:::::::.-:................::::::.:::::::::::::::::::::::::.:::::::.:::&:i . •• Ni.:.Nal.:::••::.........-...-'.:.::::.:::::::::::.:;:::::::::::::•:::::::::::::::.:::::::::::::::::,......••••••::::•:•:.::•. :eta::: ......-•..-..:•••:...::::"-:-:.:.::::':.:....•parkingr :;b:rek:::::,::::::::::::::::::::::::::.:.:••••,.,,.. :•-•:••••••••:•••••:1'I''':6ESCRIPT.:Eq.................... .. .... the :•:::::::::::::::::.::::.:.:::::::::::::::::::::::....—d:16.:conpttg ;.:„................, ........:...::.:..::::.:.::.*::....•.........,......................ii:::::::.::::.:::•::::::::::.:•:::::::.::::::::::.:::::.::::;:n..::::: ::.*::.:::::::::::::::;::i:i::::.:::::::::::.::i:: ::.:An.....„...........::::...::.:::•:: ::::.:.::::••••••••..theniaT9P:::.•.:.::::.:::::::::::::: :::.:•••••:::::.:•:•:•:::::::.: ::::::::::: :::::•:**:::•::•:::::::•::.::::, : ::::::::.:::::::::::'::::::.:::•:.•::: ::::::.:::::: :-:•:::•:::::::::::::::.::::*:::: ::::::::::::::':-.--:•:•::::::::::i.':.*::::::::•::::::: :::::::::::::;•:::.•::.:::.:8V:seafer04: P ......:,::::.::•:::::::::::...:.:.:.:.::::-..:•:::.:•: ::::::::::::::::::::: :•::::: ::::::?.%:.:::::.u....*T1 "••••••••::::::.::::::::::•::R::::::::::::•:.::..:•::•:•:::::•:.:•::::.::::•:*:.....:miii........:::: :::::::::::•:::::::?:::::.::.:::•.:•::.:::.:•:::.::::::.,.::::-.....:.:.::::::.::.:::.s....,,-.?..7.::::::::•::::•::::.:::: ::::.::::::::::.:•::•::.::::.::::::.:.:.:.:.........:-..:i:ii:..::•:?......:E: ::::::K: ::-:.:u•iii : .::::ini•:::•::•:::::::::: :::::::::::::::1,,, ::::::::::::::::;.;.::::::,....::::::.•::•:::.:::::.:•:::••••:....:',.:::•::':;:.:::•...:::::::.::::::i:.:•::1:::1::1: :::::.::::::::::.:::ii::ii::i::::::::?•:::.11:ii:ili:::!•:,:iiiiiiiiH:.•:;;;;.:.:::.:;.:.....:..........•••::::•..........:„•;;;•:::::::::::•;;;;•;iiciiiiiii.::::::::::b.:...:.:::::.:-.....1 .v.,-:..a-...?:119y.., ::111....1011.:.:W4.::.:Y...:.;::::•::::::::::::::::::.::.::::',.....::::::.:.:::::::::::::•::::::•:•:.:—....••••• •:-....::::.:•:::::::M:::::::: :: ::::M....:•• ••••: :•••••••................:: ::.••••.2•............-:••••:,.. ....:„......::......::::::::::::•:::•::•::-::::::.::•::::::1911::•:Mp.,P.::::„.....::..::::..:.:.:::::::::::.............• • •• ••••••• ..........,..,,,,,,,,,........,::: ::::::::::..:.:.:.:.:.::,:::::,:,:::::::::. ......:::.*:::::•.::.:.:.:.:....:.:.:..,.....,..... ...........::::::::...::::.:: :::.i.......::::::::•.:::::,::•••••••••••:::::::::::::K:•::•::::: ,...i),..4hoo$ :::.:::::•:*ii:::: : ::::::•:iii•:::::::::::.:••••:•:•••••••••••• • . .....::::•:.:::.....: fiON.:0......:,.. ..,..,-....:.:::.......::.:.::::::::::::.::,:•:::.::::::.:.:.:......: •:::::::::::......:::.::::;:imil.:1()Q.A... :::::::::::::••••••••••••:•:•:••••••••••'...••- • .\\\ 0 0# ) Ili 1__J , ri i / 0 ) 0 1 Li li 1- 1 :/ 1 --- ' -I 1 = I, -,-• U_ • . 11 I, .. _ , r - A . , z rs 1 . / . 1 . n1 F_J 1 . 1 I — , . s „ • • • ',. '• . . . . . . 1---1,- \0 / . . I 1 1 r-3 .. : i 11 11 III I. —I 1 1 . .. // , ' (..// , , /, / , /s(e/ ,''-- CA 1\/ -g , ,, \; ° / ' '' 2/6\g • '' ,'' „, ,' `--, ---' --/ / / •-• ....•••• .-, CITY JUL. _-- Fon 3ikz..( ,- .,-TOrlt.14;aZT l'41'-- • Ce , \ LD E I • "‘ \ - • . 7, ,71611 • +echnical Advisory Committee Staff Report Cedar River Park Shop Improvement August 3, 1990 Page 2 • LAND USE 1. Whether the proposed project is consistent with the Comprehensive plan zoning designation and with Goals, Policies and Objectives set forth in the Plan. • The proposed development is consistent-with the Comprehensive Plan Map, which designates the site for Recreation uses and with the Comprehensive Plan Elements for Parks and Recreation. 2. Whether the proposed project is consistent with the land use map zoning designation and applicable Zoning Ordinance components. The subject property is zoned Public Zone (P-1), which permits municipal parks and there accessory uses. The proposed development adequately addresses the development standards for park facilities. • 3. Whether the proposes project is consistent with the Zoning Ordinance and other applicable regulations/standards. The land to the west of the project site is reserved for the 1-405 freeway,the property to the north is zoned for Business District (B-1), to the east is zoned Heavy Industry District (H-1) and to the south is zoned Public Zone (P-1). The project as proposed adequately addresses the development standards regarding the adjacent zones. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Whether the applicant has adequately identified and addressed the following environmental impacts likely to occur in conjunction with the proposed development. a. Aesthetics/Land Use Impacts: The proposed development consists of converting the Taco Time office building into a park maintenance building, an addition to the existing parking area, construction of a storage shed and construction of an outdoor day-care play area. The addition to the parking area will provide an area for 37 standard parking stalls and 14 compact parking stalls. The storage shed will be approximately 180 ft. by 40 ft. The outdoor day-care play area will be adjacent to the Recreation Center and will cover approximately 900 sq. ft.with a three-foot high concrete wall surrounding the area. The Cedar River Park is already well landscaped. The only additional landscaping that will be provided in conjunction with this project is the proposed landscape buffer around the new parking area. Mitigation Measures: The landscaping plan submitted 'by the applicant will adequately buffer the proposed new parking area. The existing landscaping on site will buffer the proposed additions to the park maintenance area and the Recreation Center. Policy Nexus: Parking and Loading Ordinance 4-14, Landscape Requirements 4-32-34. b. Natural Environment • Impacts: All of the proposed development is located beyond the 200 foot shoreline setback from the Cedar River. As the project site is fairly level only minor grading will be necessary for the proposed development. The project is located within the Aquifer Protection Area, Zone I. Due to the unique concerns of this area the applicant has agreed not to store pesticides, herbicides or other chemicals on the project site. The shed area will only be used to store vehicles and hand . tools. • Mitigation Measures: The proposed development will maintain the 200 foot Shoreline setback from the Cedar River. The applicant will not be storing pesticides or other chemicals on the project site that could impact the aquifer. • • • Tebhnical Advisory Committee Staff Report Cedar River Park Shop Improvement August 3, 1990 Page 3 Policy Nexus: Environmental Review Ordinance 4-6 c. Noise, Light and Glare Impacts: 1) Construction: Noise, light and glare are potential impacts in conjunction with the construction of the parking lot and shed. Due to the nature of the surrounding uses, heavy industry and commercial, and the distance from the project site to the adjacent uses these impacts are expected to be minimal. Some mitigation of these impacts will be achieved through the limiting of construction to normal business hours and due to the existing landscaping. 2) Operations: During the operation of the park facilities some noise, light and glare will be generated from the security lighting and the general use of the facilities. These impacts should prove to be minor due to the nature of the surrounding area and its use. Mitigation will be achieved through the addition landscaping proposed by the applicant and the existing landscape features. Policy Nexus: Landscape Requirements 4-31-34, Comprehensive Plan Section III.C. d. Public Services 1) Recreation Impact: The Parks and Recreation Division of the Community Services Department has indicated that these facilities are needed in order to meet the requirements placed on the Cedar River Park and the Recreation Center. Mitigation Measures: None required. Policy Nexus: Environmental Review Ordinance 4-6 2) Police and Fire Impacts: Police and Fire Prevention Bureau staff,report adequate resources to provide anticipated services to the site during construction activities and during operation with the Code-required improvements (e.g. 20 foot wide fire lanes, fire hydrants. Mitigation Measures: None required. Policy Nexus: Environmental Review Ordinance 4-6. 3) Storm Water Impacts: This project is within a Zone I Aquifer Recharge Area. In order to ensure the protection of the aquifer mitigation measures will be required in conjunction with the construction and operation of the project. Mitigation Measures: The applicant will need to provide plans showing the new drainage system with slopes, catch basins, oil/water separator and piping on the south/east sides of the proposed building. These plans shall also demonstrate the connection between the existing system and the new system. Policy Nexus: Environmental Review Ordinance 4-6 4) Utilities Impacts: Public utility lines are generally available to serve the site. There is a concern on the part of the Utilities Division that the proposed structure encroaches over an existing over an existing 42" Metro trunk line. Parks and Recreation has indicated that they are aware of the easement and that the proposed shed will not encroach within the easement. • echnical Advisory Committee St'� aff Report Cedar River Park Shop Improvement August 3, 1990 Page 4 • Mitigation Measures: At the time of construction the necessary survey will be completed to ensure that the building does not encroach into the easement for the 42" Metro trunk line. Policy Nexus: Environmental Review Ordinance 4-6 S ca c O11lI:IVI�N:1'��O:l� F�EV1:�11ll1NG:b..........R............iiiii ...... `�� crime s i= -; ; ii ; ; - ; ; - : i _` _ ::_:�:: �:sula_..._...._.ed...._....�1.u.... ........99Ua..e...a a_......................_..._...............................__.. ......._ ... .:::.::::::::::_::::::::::-..:::.................................. . ._.... RENTON PLANNING DIVISION 4 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Nazi DATE CIRCULATED: July 6, 1990 COMMENTS DUE: July 25, 1990 EFC-072-90 APPLICATION NO(S): SA-072-90 PROPONENT: City of Renton, Parks&Recreation PROJECT TITLE: Cedar River Park Shop Improvements BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Create a functional park maintenance building from the old Taco Time building, construct a new shed (approximately 140'x 80'), an outdoor daycare area and enlarge the parking area. LOCATION: 1911 Maple Valley Highway SITE AREA: 18.6 acres BUILDING AREA (gross): 18,100 Total IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS: PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth 2. Air 3. Water 4. Plants 5. Animals 6. Energy& Natural Resources 7. Environmental Health 8. Land &Shoreline Use 9. Housing 5<" 10. Aesthetics 11. Light& Glare 12. Recreation 13. Historic&Cultural Preservation 14. Transportation 15. Public Services 16. Utilities COMMENTS: • We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. 4-e" proSignature of Directo Authorized Representative Date RENTON PLANNING DIVISION DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET E IiF-072-90 APPLICATION NO(S).:' SA-072-90 PROPONENT: City of Renton, Parks &Recreation P F OJECT TITLE: Cedar River Park Shop Improvements BIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Create a functional parks maintenance building from the o Taco Time building, construct a new shed (approximately 140'x 80'), and enlarge the parking area. LOCATION: 1911 Maple Valley Highway ' I TO: ; PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT • COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ---. I cryOFRENTON . E C E I V E 2( BUILDING DIVISION I JUL 61990 PLANNING DIVISION CURRENT PLANNING L._ _BUILDING DIVISION ;' LONG RANGE PLANNING PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: •• COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. ; PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5:00 P.M. ON July 25, 1990. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: ,J'G13 I APPROVED '� APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED Of?-'i OF REN-I oN JUL T. 6 11990 ' vySswa .. U • //.2 . • 4 - DATE: / 4 —7) ) SIGNATURE OF QIRECJOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE • REV. 5/90 . RENTON PLANNING DIVISION • ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: pc,-- DATE CIRCULATED: July 6, 1990 COMMENTS DUE: July 25, 1990 EFC-072-90 APPLICATION NO(S): SA-072-90 PROPONENT: City of Renton, Parks&Recreation PROJECT TITLE: Cedar River Park Shop Improvements BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Create a functional park maintenance building from the old Taco Time building, construct a new shed (approximately 140'x 80'), an outdoor daycare area and enlarge the parking area. LOCATION: 1911 Maple Valley Highway SITE AREA: 18.6 acres BUILDING AREA(gross): 18,100 Total IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS: PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth 2. Air 3. Water 4. Plants 5. Animals 6. Energy& Natural Resources 7. Environmental Health 8. Land &Shoreline Use 9. Housing 10. Aesthetics 11. Light&Glare 12. Recreation 13. Historic&Cultural Preservation 14. Transportation 15. Public Services 16. Utilities COMMENTS: We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date RENTON PLANNING DIVISION DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF-072-90 APPLICATION N.O(S).: SA-072-90 PROPONENT: City of Renton, Parks &Recreation PROJECT TITLE: Cedar River Park Shop Improvements BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Create a functional parks maintenance building from the old Taco Time building, construct a new shed (approximately 140'x 80'), and enlarge the parking area. LOCATION: 1911 Maple Valley Highway TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION CURRENT PLANNING LONG RANGE PLANNING XPARKS AND RECREATION.DEPARTMENT OTHERS: • CO MENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. LEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5:00 P.M. ON July 25, 1990. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: VC { -S APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS _ NOT APPROVED _X/A6 7# — g t • _ PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF RI_IW ICFN_ANN'N'G'DIVISION; co.. "'::NTON 1tj - 9 ^1? J • DATE: 7-- 6'-� NATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 5/90 F ' ' RENTON PLANNING DIVISION ' ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMEN &mpo —ham DATE CIRCULATED: July 6, 1990 COMMENTS DUE: July 25, 1990 EFC-072-90 APPLICATION NO(S): SA-072-90 r PROPONENT: City of Renton, Parks &Recreation PROJECT TITLE: Cedar River Park Shop Improvements BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Create a functional park maintenance building from the old Taco Time building, construct a new shed (approximately 140'x 80'), an outdoor daycare area and enlarge the parking area. LOCATION: 1911 Maple Valley Highway - SITE AREA: 18.6 acres BUILDING AREA (gross): 18,100 Total IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS: PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION , IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth L./ 2. Air 3. Water 4. Plants 5. Animals 6. Energy& Natural Resources 7. Environmental Health 8. Land &Shoreline Use 9. Housing 10. Aesthetics 11. Light&Glare 12. Recreation 13. Historic & Cultural Preservation 14. Transportation 15. Public Services 16. Utilities 11 � / COMMENTS: N O S, 1 ci ; f,( a?Le./ 4714,S pD ta.r)0 S ! Gsti pSGz4S We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Z.e;.ip,2,,. X t 7, Signature of Director'or Authorized Representat' Date d / raggilm-24, 11 RENTON PLANNING DIVISION JUL 13 6 1990 DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET CITY OF RENT ON PUBLIC WORKS CUSTta11gsaCES APPLICATION NO(S).: SA-072-90 PROPONENT: City of Renton, Parks &Recreation PROJECT TITLE: • Cedar River Park Shop Improvements f � BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:.• Create a functional parks maintenance building from the old Taco Time building, construct a new shed (approximately 140'x 80'), and enlarge the parking area. LOCATION: 1911 Maple Valley Highway 0: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION CURRENT PLANNING LONG RANGE PLANNING PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5:00 P.M. ON July 25, 1990. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: / re2/4 8 Y f oZ t/ate 6`�sfe s 1 APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVE No 5, h , /3/ a f 7 a,r � td-bc h.,,,pa s PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF Fib is1TC�iN .1`, _ C DATE. 0/'SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZE PRESENTATIVE If • f,� REV. 5/90 .RENTON PLANNING DIVISION ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: • t DATE CIRCULATED: July 6, 1990 COMMENTS DUE: July 25, 1990 EFC-072-90 APPLICATION NO(S): SA-072-90 PROPONENT: City of Renton, Parks & Recreation PROJECT TITLE: Cedar River Park Shop Improvements BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Create a functional park maintenance building from the old Taco Time building, construct a new shed (approximately 140'x 80'), an outdoor daycare area and enlarge the parking area. LOCATION: 1911 Maple Valley Highway SITE AREA: 18.6 acres BUILDING AREA (gross): 18,100 Total IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS: PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth 2. Air 3. Water 4. Plants 5. Animals 6. Energy& Natural Resources 7. Environmental Health 8. Land &Shoreline Use 9. Housing 10. Aesthetics 11. Light&Glare V 12. Recreation 13. Historic&Cultural Preservation 14. Transportation 15. Public Services ✓ 16. Utilities COMMENTS: We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. /?f1 Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Dat144 • REI\►TON FIRE DEPT. I FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU RENTON PLANNING DIVISION JUL - G 1990 DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET . I D ECF-072-90 APPLICATION NO(S).:. SA-072-90 ROPONENT: City of Renton, Parks &Recreation ROJECT TITLE: Cedar River Park ShopImprovements P i. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Create a functional parks maintenance building from the Id Taco Time building, construct a new shed (approximately 140'x 80'), and enlarge the parking area. I, OCATION: 1911 Maple Valley Highway ,O: 1 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION ' FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU ' POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 1 BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISIoN ' CITY OF REN-ror;J CURRENT PLANNING LONG RANGE PLANNING JUL - 9 1990 � y +1 ItGV7 4layy'� i r�Li+�i PARKS AND RECREATION`DEPARTMENT K OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5:00 P.M. ON July 25, 1990. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: -f 1r2.- APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED 1 Any development and/or construction shall comply with current Fire and Building Codes and Ordi- nances. A eans of approved access is required. Fire Department access roads/lanes shall be paved minimuI dth 20'; minimum height 13' 6". Yes --No Preliminary, 7S fire flow calculations show a fire flow of I, . ff in is required. I 1/ hydrants with a minimum flow of // coo gpm leach is required. , Primary hdrant is required to be within /so feet of the structure. Secondary hydrants are required to be within 3 0o feet of the structure. An approved automatic sprinkler system is required to protect the total structure. Yes_ o All fire department access roads are to be paved and installed prior to construction. Yes_ No — All. fire hydrants are required to be installed and approved prior to construction. Yes ✓ No 1 • ZDATE: G, /99d SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE 1 1 REV. 5/90 RENTON PLANNING DIVISION ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: os 1 DATE CIRCULATED: July 6, 1990 COMMENTS DUE: July 25, 1990 EFC-072-90 APPLICATION NO(S): SA-072-90 PROPONENT: City of Renton, Parks & Recreation PROJECT TITLE: Cedar River Park Shop Improvements BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Create a functional park maintenance building from the old Taco Time building, construct a new shed (approximately 140'x 80'), an outdoor daycare area and enlarge the parking area. LOCATION: 1911 Maple Valley Highway SITE AREA: 18.6 acres BUILDING AREA (gross): 18,1.00 Total IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS: PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth 2. Air 3. Water 4. Plants 5. Animals 6. Energy& Natural Resources 7. Environmental Health 8. Land &Shoreline Use 9. Housing 10. Aesthetics 11. Light&Glare 12. Recreation 13. Historic&Cultural Preservation 14. Transportation 15. Public Services 16. Utilities COMMENTS: 1)erAwE . Prop-tii n ox,s o,s c�war e.4.L 136 STa,e-"St, oA.; s e igr C A°W1;.EZ 31,4001-- s'-c 3oSTEI> 0k.1 -sure-, (IIJSa`$ D &( Sb We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of irector or Authorized Representative Date RENTON PLANNING DIVISION DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET E0E-072-90 APPLICATION NO(S).: SA-072-90 ROPONENT: City of Renton, Parks & Recreation PROJECT TITLE: Cedar River Park Shop Improvements 6,RIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Create a functional parks maintenance building from the Id Taco Time building, construct a new shed (approximately 140'x 80'), and enlarge the parking area. LOCATION: 1911 Maple Valley Highway TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION CURRENT PLANNING LONG RANGE PLANNING PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: ' COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5:00 P.M. ON July 25, 1990. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: tt)-(40,\ APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED I ' I ' I I I � PLAN'NiNG DIVISION ^!YOFi?FPThN I I 91990 n D / / DATE: -7( r(/11( SIGNATUR OF *IRE TOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 5/90 I 1 RENTON PLANNING DIVISION ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: PC_)\�CS�� DATE CIRCULATED: July 6, 1990 COMMENTS DUE: July 25, 1990 EFC-072-90 • APPLICATION NO(S): SA-072-90 PROPONENT: City of Renton, Parks &Recreation PROJECT TITLE: Cedar River Park Shop Improvements BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Create a functional park maintenance building from the old Taco Time building, construct a new shed (approximately 140'x 80'), an outdoor daycare area and enlarge the parking area. LOCATION: 1911 Maple Valley Highway SITE AREA: 18.6 acres BUILDING AREA (gross): 18,100 Total IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL tLEMENTS: PROBABLE :, PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth 2. Air 3. Water 4. Plants 5. Animals 6. Energy&Natural Resources 7. Environmental Health 8. Land &Shoreline Use 9. Housing _ 10. Aesthetics 11. Light&Glare 12. Recreation 13. Historic&Cultural Preservation 14. Transportation 15. Public Services 1/ 16. Utilities COMMENTS: We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. 2,{,LAitiirlf36)r Tt O Signature of Director or uthorized Rdpresentative Date `" / 4{4. I RENTON PLANNING DIVISION .,, DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ;,. _lt e � `fir/)%,I, 4 Lt 10 N.. !. > ECF-072-90 APPLICATION NO(S).: SA-072-90 `.'a'r PROPONENT: City of Renton, Parks & Recreation 1 P i OJECT TITLE: Cedar River Park Shop Improvements I I BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Create a functional parks maintenance building from the o d Taco Time building, construct a new shed (approximately 140'x 80'), and enlarge the parking area. 1;, P L CATION: 1911 Maple Valley Highway O: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU X POLICE DEPARTMENT ! I COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION CURRENT PLANNING ' LONG RANGE PLANNING PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: . COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5:00 P.M. ON July 25, 1990. I� REVI WING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: Itc+L, V APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED • ' - LSD,_ ' bUlli in DATE: 07 LSD f SIGNATURE OF DIRLICTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE • REV! 5/90 t„ RENTON PLANNING DIVISION b.y• ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET '4u <;•f ,r4 J . , REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: ` per Qy- u ti:t, , • DATE CIRCULATED: July 6, 1990 COMMENTS DUE: July 25, 1990 EFC-072-90 APPLICATION NO(S): SA-072-90 PROPONENT: City of Renton, Parks & Recreation PROJECT TITLE: Cedar River Park Shop Improvements BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Create a functional park maintenance building from the old Taco Time building, construct a new shed (approximately 140'x 80'), an outdoor daycare area and enlarge the parking area. LOCATION: 1911 Maple Valley Highway SITE AREA: 18.6 acres BUILDING AREA (gross): 18,100 Total IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS: PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth 2. Air • '3. Water 4. Plants 5. Animals 6. Energy& Natural Resources 7. Environmental Health 8. Land &Shoreline Use 9. Housing 10. Aesthetics 11. Light&Glare 12. Recreation 13. Historic&Cultural Preservation 14. Transportation 15. Public Services 16. Utilities x X COMMENTS: - SE& (..0 Nn 6N A-r --Ncxco 'WI eq.° tVemf cc917u ci-riurQ w 3,4cer '. ' U Vf ELT i l-kQCLo v et,&vs A n6 2.0w E d-c 'SZ-t rcv ) A-V, A We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. q 7 � Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date • ON-MIc- ,<lf� JUL 0 9 1990 RENTON PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF REIN►Uiy c'J PUBLIC WORKS DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET CUSTOMER SERVICES ECF 072-90 . APPLICATION N.0(S).: SA-072-90 PROPONENT: City of Renton, Parks &Recreation ;1' PROJECT TITLE: Cedar River Park Shop Improvements 11 BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Create a functional parks maintenance building from he old Taco Time building, construct a riew shed (approximately 140'x 80'), and enlarge the parking area.;, LOCATION: 1911 Maple Valley Highway TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: ti UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION . PLANNING DIVISION CURRENT PLANNING LONG RANGE PLANNING PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT i( OTHERS: `ck COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5:00 P.M. ON July 25, 1990. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: \NA' (Mitt Yi4Y1 Oa. APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS X NOT APPROVED OQ SEO S1Rtic(UARE ENcRaNCKES cJC-Q EXlS'hrlb I%Clr1zp 42" TS?unnc u.x6 (SE A1ffit ED PC-AN of E2c1STiaG- u-ciu-tits) CouoiiiinA5 of AU. CQ13S1V.V 1'01J nuST +- et ' Or Olt ifE2 crEot-io,J 6Rb,Nnric& uvor -Irs SASS AGe 1 P-Q, Walt i N -DIKE k of A auiC-etZ "QS-61 c i aU Act- �_)},_(;1.) DATE: 7 'I 7-1 0I SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 5/90 .. I I RENTON PLANNING DIVISION • ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: DATE CIRCULATED: July 6, 1990 COMMENTS DUE: July 25, 1999 EFC-072-90 APPLICATION NO(S): SA-072-90 �,„ r r PROPONENT: City of Renton, Parks & Recreation PROJECT TITLE: Cedar River Park Shop Improvements BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Create a functional park maintenance building from the old Taco Time building, construct a new shed (approximately 140'x 80'), an outdoor daycare area and enlarge the parking area. LOCATION: 1911 Maple Valley Highway SITE AREA: 18.6 acres BUILDING AREA (gross): 18,100 Total IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS: PROBABLE , PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth 2. Air 3. Water 4. Plants 5. Animals 6. Energy& Natural Resources 7. Environmental Health 8. Land &Shoreline Use 9. Housing 10. Aesthetics • 3 11. Light&Glare 12. Recreation 13. Historic& Cultural Preservation 14. Transportation 15. Public Services 16. Utilities _ COMMENTS: 7-1717s f/fc7 c_ps4 /AL Z aX 4P/4 We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information Is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date JUL 0 6 1990 CITY OF REN ION RENTON PLANNING DIVISION PUBLIC WORKS DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET CUSTOMER SERVICES .. , ECF-072-90 APPLICATION NO(S).: SA-072-90 PROPONENT: City of Renton, Parks & Recreation PROJECT TITLE: Cedar River Park Shop Improvements BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Create a functional parks maintenance building from the old Taco Time building, construct a new shed (approximately 140'x 80'), and enlarge the parking area. LOCATION: 1911 Maple Valley Highway TO: ' PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION II FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION CURRENT PLANNING LONG RANGE PLANNING PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT C' A OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5:00 P.M. ON July 25, 1990. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: l(, APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED • - iece DATE: 7'-/ ?--? SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUT-iORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 5/90 • 'RENTON PLANNING DIVISION ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: d/'UrY1 DATE CIRCULATED: July 6, 1990 COMMENTS DUE: July 25, 1990 EFC-072-90 APPLICATION NO(S): SA-072-90 PROPONENT: City of Renton, Parks&Recreation PROJECT TITLE: Cedar River Park Shop Improvements BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Create a functional park maintenance building from the old Taco Time building, construct a new shed (approximately 140'x 80'), an outdoor daycare area and enlarge the parking area. LOCATION: 1911 Maple Valley Highway SITE AREA: 18.6 acres BUILDING AREA (gross): 18,100 Total IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS: PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth 2. Air 3. Water • 4. Plants 5. Animals 6. Energy& Natural Resources 7. Environmental Health 8. Land &Shoreline Use 9. Housing 10. Aesthetics ' 11. Light&Glare 12. Recreation 13. Historic &Cultural Preservation 14. Transportation 15. Public Services r� 16. Utilities COMMENTS: xr6 w 0/1 AJ1 is Syf 1 l/I C.v OT�/ 5L -S, c _s J 0 c-./ 5-1pEy OF A6 'Q764 , < w 'ASP1464t- T 414A sydw,v) S ySY7 M We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have Identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. • 7-1 7a Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date JUL 0 6 1990 PITY OF REN I ON RENTON PLANNING DIVISION / .dF, PUBLIC WORKS L 1 � 80 DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET t u 1� CUSTOMER SERVICES . .:::,,r ECF-072-90 APPLICATION NIO(S).: SA-072-90 PROPONENT: City of Renton, Parks &Recreation PROJECT TITLE: Cedar River Park Shop Improvements �I BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Create a functional parks maintenance building from he old Taco Time building, construct a new shed (approximately 140'x 80'), and enlarge the parking area 4 LOCATION: 1911 Maple Valley Highway • TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION CURRENT PLANNING LONG RANGE PLANNING PARKS AND ECREATION DEPARTMENT X OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5:00 P.M. ON July 25, 1990. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: ON(Y\ APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED I ¢ - I I I -/ • ' �' � DATE: 7 f-yo SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE . REV. 5/90 RENTON PLANNING DIVISION ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: CL-LVW_X 1:)1C V, DATE CIRCULATED: July 6, 1990 COMMENTS DUE: July 25, 1990 EFC-072-90 • APPLICATION NO(S): SA-072-90 PROPONENT: City of Renton, Parks&Recreation PROJECT TITLE: Cedar River Park Shop Improvements BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Create a functional park maintenance building from the old Taco Time building, construct a new shed (approximately 140'x 80'), an outdoor daycare area and enlarge the parking area. LOCATION: 1911 Maple Valley Highway SITE AREA: 18.6 acres BUILDING AREA (gross): 18,100 Total IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS: PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth 2. Air 3. Water . 4. Plants 5. Animals 6. Energy&Natural Resources 7. Environmental Health 8. Land &Shoreline Use 9. Housing 10. Aesthetics 11. Light&Glare 12. Recreation 13. Historic&Cultural Preservation 14. Transportation 15. Public Services 16. Utilities COMMENTS: 1 NI-0- _ ---Q Q-.C_k}-CCELA e- t4-•V\.u_.c_Q.-(.t„JZ.•L__. 't 01Q_L_Ce- (--- -S"`-‘-'--j)-- \\ VvL L,c.0-6(:( ?---,,sp—L_ __4 '' V 3) y_. 1_E i.._S;j-,ti_Q, v-ritc_c..t.t`t %i 6.J\ ;4t_--.4 I) nh('4,fi )--0-- P--'u _-(-°- L..- n We have reviewed this application with particular attentionOto those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. e-QA-Wili 1 jz (. l Signature of Director or Aut rized Representative Date .. c v G RENTON PLANNING DIVISION DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET l � ECF-072-90 APPLICATION NO(S).: SA-072-90 I' PROPONENT: City of Renton, Parks &Recreation PROJECT TITLE: Cedar River Park Shop Improvements BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Create a functional parks maintenance building from the ;, old Taco Time building, construct a new shed (approximately 140'x 80'), and enlarge the parking area. i; LOCATION: 1911 Maple Valley Highway TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: T UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION I ' FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION XCURRENT PLANNING LONG RANGE PLANNING PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5:00 P.M. ON July 25, 1990. � REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: `(� a-r\re-t1� APPROVED XPPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED • tt.)1/4.04.0r1* � �Q .C--_ Cal-l.}•--�---Cam.._-lP'�•.lti.,�.1•tr_S-�'� ��1.4..�vt,L�-e-t_s-..� DATE: ) 1 6 Ik, SIGNATURE OF DIRECTO OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 5/90 City of Renton Technical Advisory Committee MEETING NOTICE August 3, 1990 To: Greg Zimmerman David Martin Glen Gordon Sam Chastain Penny Bryant Jim Hanson rom: Don Erickson, Chairman Meeting Date: August 3, 1990 Time: 830 AM Location: Third Floor Conference Room Agenda is listed below. TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE AGENDA AUGUST 3, 1990 Third Floor Conference Room Commencing at 8:30 AM TIME/KEY PARTICIPANTS NEW PROJECTS HEATHERROSE PRELIMINARY PLAT ECF;PP-071-90 Applicant seeks to subdivide a 3.34 acre property, zoned R-1, into 14 parcels for future single-family home development. The platting encompasses four discrete parcels, of which two have been previously subdivided; three single-family residences which now exist on the property are to be retained. CEDAR RIVER PARK, PARKS DEPT. ECF;SA-072-90 Applicant proposes to create a functional parks maintenance building from the old Taco Time building, construct a new shed (approximately 140' x 80'), and enlarge the parking area. VALLEY GARDEN HEALTH CENTER ECF;R-056-90 The applicant is requesting approval of a rezoning of two parcels from R-3 (Multi-family Residential and P-1 (Public Zone) to O-P (Office Park District). VILLAGE PLACE NORTH CU;ECF;SA;V-078-90 Applicant proposes to construct a new 10-story office/retail building requiring a Conditional Use Permit since building will exceed 95' in height. The proposal also includes a renovation of existing retail center and existing drives, demolition of a portion of the existing retail, renovation of landscaping and lighting. A variance will also be needed to construct a new private street. RENTON PLANNING DIVISION ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: .54 DATE CIRCULATED: July 6, 1990 COMMENTS DUE: July 25, 1990 EFC-072-90 APPLICATION NO(S): SA-072-90 PROPONENT: City of Renton, Parks&Recreation PROJECT TITLE: Cedar River Park Shop Improvements BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Create a functional park maintenance building from the old Taco Time building, construct a new shed (approximately 140'x 80'),an outdoor daycare area and enlarge the parking area. LOCATION: 1911 Maple Valley Highway SITE AREA: 18.6 acres BUILDING AREA(gross): 18,100 Total IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS: PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth 2. Air 3. Water 4. Plants 5. Animals 6. Energy&Natural Resources 7. Environmental Health 8. Land &Shoreline Use 9. Housing SC 10. Aesthetics 11. Light&Glare 12. Recreation 13. Historic&Cultural Preservation 14. Transportation 15. Public Services 16. Utilities COMMENTS: • We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. • — `-sue --9 V Signature of Directo Authorized Representative Date l� RENTON PLANNING DIVISION DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF-072-90 APPLICATION NO(S).:; SA-072-90 PROPONENT: City of Renton, Parks&Recreation PROJECT TITLE: Cedar River Park Shop Improvements BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Create a functional parks maintenance building from the old Taco Time building, construct a new shed (approximately 140'x 80'),and enlarge the parking area. LOCATION: 1911 Maple Valley Highway TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT orn7c - 44 E E BV E 2 BUILDING DIVISION i i z } PLANNING DIVISION' JUL - 6 1990 CURRENT PLANNING t _ BUILDING DIVISION �" LONG RANGE PLANNING PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5:00 P.M. ON July 25, 1990. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: I�I,G1� APPROVED \'. APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED f\jC7 �YJU i LD�.v'C� GAD`t) G(-�EcJc (�Ey PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF RENTON JUL - 6 1990 RECEIVE® DATE: SIGNATURE OF D *Ft OR AUTHORIZED REP ESENTATIVE REV.5/90 RENTON PLANNING DIVISION ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: PO.a(ks • DATE CIRCULATED: July 6, 1990 • COMMENTS DUE: July 25, 1990 EFC-072-90 APPLICATION NO(S): SA-072-90 PROPONENT: City of Renton, Parks&Recreation PROJECT TITLE: Cedar River Park Shop Improvements BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Create a functional park maintenance building from the old Taco Time building, construct a new shed (approximately 140`x 80'),an outdoor daycare area and enlarge the parking area. LOCATION: 1911 Maple Valley Highway SITE AREA: 18.6 acres BUILDING AREA(gross): 18,100 Total IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS: PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth 2. Air 3. Water 4. Plants 5. Animals 6. Energy&Natural Resources 7. Environmental Health 8. Land &Shoreline Use 9. Housing - 10. Aesthetics 11. Light&Glare 12. Recreation 13. Historic&Cultural Preservation 14. Transportation 15. Public Services 16. Utilities =.-- COMMENTS: We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date .. E f RENTON PLANNING DIVISION DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF-072-90 APPLICATION NO(S).: SA-072-90 PROPONENT: City of Renton, Parks&Recreation PROJECT TITLE: Cedar River Park Shop Improvements BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Create a functional parks maintenance building from the old Taco Time building, construct a new shed (approximately 140'x 80'),and enlarge the parking area. LOCATION: 1911 Maple Valley Highway TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING'DIVISION' CURRENT PLANNING LONG RANGE PLANNING _4_PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: • • COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5:00 P.M. ON July 25, 1990. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: Va-)0K5 APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED -774 I1t_ 4.- avyy/a-4--- -- PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF RENTCFMANN/NG DIVISION y CP' .:7 NTON :Jul m 9 •npri �11 " hI _ � J DATE: NATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 5/90 RENTON PLANNING DIVISION ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENZ( GY\ DATE CIRCULATED: July 6, 1990 COMMENTS DUE: July 25, 1990 EFC-072-90 APPLICATION NO(S): SA-072-90 PROPONENT: City of Renton, Parks&Recreation PROJECT TITLE: Cedar River Park Shop Improvements BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Create a functional park maintenance building from the old Taco Time building, construct a new shed (approximately 140'x 80'),an outdoor daycare area and enlarge the parking area. LOCATION: 1911 Maple Valley Highway - SITE AREA: 18.6 acres BUILDING AREA(gross): 18,100 Total IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS: PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth L/ 2. Air 3. Water 4. Plants • ` 5. Animals 6. Energy&Natural Resources 7. Environmental Health 8. Land &Shoreline Use 9. Housing 10. Aesthetics 11. Light&Glare • 12. Recreation 13. Historic&Cultural Preservation 14. Transportation 15. Public Services 16. Utilities COMMENTS: 11 o SI ti I r/f a?kI 7 �/O J v—ay 5 �� � fa. 4-7 < <.s,p.di.e.74s We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal Signature of Director or Authorized Representat' DatePrC7 / s's 2 P011g71111 1�'' RENT ON PLANNING DIVISION JUL 0 6 1990 DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET CITY OF RENT UN PUBLIC WORKS CUSTOM R,IICES APPLICATION NO(S).: SA-072-90 PROPONENT: City of Renton, Parks&Recreation PROJECT TITLE: ;;; Cedar River Park Shop Improvements BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:: Create a functional parks maintenance building from the old Taco Time building, construct a new shed (approximately 140'x 80'),and enlarge the parking area. LOCATION: 1911 Maple Valley Highway TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION" CURRENT PLANNING LONG RANGE PLANNING PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5:00 P.M. ON July 25, 1990. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: , 1'd/9S pt Y f at/ash 6-ys7el2, S APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED • No 511 h , f°.,�a4.7� a,.t bF 7a- is 7 h.2, s PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF RENTON Jl3t._ ® MO cS7 DATE: / / d� l SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZE -PRESENTATIVE TIPP REV.5/90 s RENTON PLANNING DIVISION ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: F DATE CIRCULATED: July 6, 1990 COMMENTS DUE: July 25, 1990 EFC-072-90 APPLICATION NO(S): SA-072-90 PROPONENT: City of Renton, Parks&Recreation PROJECT TITLE: Cedar River Park Shop Improvements BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Create a functional park maintenance building from the old Taco Time building, construct a new shed (approximately 140'x 80'), an outdoor daycare area and enlarge the parking area. LOCATION: 1911 Maple Valley Highway SITE AREA: 18.6 acres BUILDING AREA(gross): 18,100 Total IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS: PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE • MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth 2. Air 3. Water 4. Plants 5. Animals 6. Energy&Natural Resources 7. Environmental Health 8. Land &Shoreline Use 9. Housing 10. Aesthetics 11. Light&Glare 12. Recreation 13. Historic&Cultural Preservation 14. Transportation 15. Public Services ✓ 16. Utilities COMMENTS: We have reviewed this application with particular..attention to those areas in which we.have expertise and have identified -- areas of probable impact or areas where,additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. 1'444 /}9yp Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Da RENT'DN FIRE DEPT. FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU RENTON PLANNING DIVISION JUL - 61990 DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET RECEIVED ECF-072-90 APPLICATION NO(S).:, SA-072-90 PROPONENT: - City of Renton, Parks&Recreation PROJECT TITLE: Cedar River Park Shop Improvements BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Create a functional parks maintenance building from the old Taco Time building, construct a new shed (approximately 140'x 80'), and enlarge the parking area. LOCATION: 1911 Maple Valley Highway TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION Nic FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION Y. PLANNING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF RENTON CURRENT PLANNING LONG RANGE PLANNING JUL - 91990 PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT iriLtAtg VIED OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5:00 P.M. ON July 25, 1990. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: -re-. APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED Any development and/or construction shall comply with current Fire and Building Codes and Ordi- nances.L f A svrl means of approved access is required. Fire Deppartment access roads/lanes shall be paved minimum width 20'; minimum height 13' 6". Yes ._No Preliminary fire flow calculations show a fire flow of /, 73O 7Pni is required. If hydrants with a minimum flow of a ra gpm each is required. Primary hydrant is required to be within /so feet of the structure. Secondary hydrants are required to be within 3 0o feet of the structure. An approved automatic sprinkler system is required to protect the total structure. Yes No All fire department access roads are to.be paved and installed prior to construction. Yes ✓No_ -All fire hydrants are required to be installed and approved prior to construction. Yes No /641-40.2‘—. DATE: G, /? O SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 5/90 • F os REQUIRED FIRE FLOW CALCULATIONS 1. HAZARD IDENTIFICATION INFORMATION NAME: 2frS U.B.C. CLASS OF BUILD ADDRESS: /%// /`M)F,Ce.' lJ144")/ 14/7liedi#P FIRE MGMT AREA 2. DETERMINE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION - CLASS (CIRCLE ONE) : I - II IV III FIRE-RESISTIVE NON-COMBUSTIBLE ORDINARY WOOD FRAME MIXED (NOTE: IF "MIXED," SEE SPECIAL INSTRUCTION FOR AREA AND BASIC FIRE FLOW) 3. DETERMINE AREA: GROUND FLOOR AREA: FT2 NUMBER OF STORIES TOTAL BUILDING AREA: g)6 Q -e- (A) 4. DETERMINE BASIC FIRE FLOW FROM TABLE #1, USING AREA (A) : GPM (B) 5. DETERMINE OCCUPANCY FACTOR ADJUSTMENT: ADJUSTMENT: GPM (C) IF LOW HAZARD, SUBTRACT UP TO 25% OF (B) : IF HIGH HAZARD, ADD UP TO 25% of (B) 6. COMPUTE SUB-TOTAL (B+C) : (IF B+C LESS THAN 500 GPM, INSERT 500 GPM) Z500 GPM (D) 7. DETERMINE SPRINKLER ADJUSTMENT: ADJUSTMENT: C'j GPM (E) (IF COMPLETELY SPRINKLERED, SUBTRACT UP TO 50% OF (D) : IF LIGHT HAZARD OCCUPANCY AND FIRE RESISTIVE OR NON-COMBUSTIBLE CONSTRUCTION, SUBTRACT UP TO 75% OF (D). 8. DETERMINE EXPOSURE ADJUSTMENT: USING THE TABLE AS A GUIDE, ENTER THE SEPARATION AND ADJUSTMENT FOR EACH OF THE "FOUR FACES" OF THE BUILDING IN THE TABLE AT THE RIGHT: SEPARATION MAX. ADJUSTMENT EXPOSURE SEPARATION ACT. ADJ. 0-10 25% MAX NORTH /SCy 'f ADD '®- ° 0 11 - 30 20% MAX EAST A/O" ADD /5--- % 31 - 60 15% MAX SOUTH ADD / 61 - 100 10% MAX WEST L/S I ADD / S % 101 - 150 5% MAX TOTAL % OF ADJUSTMENT 150 or 4-Hr WALL 0% MAX (NOT TO EXCEED 75%) J/c % (TOTAL % ADJUSTMENT TIMES (D) ADJUSTMENT: f- / / ZS 'GPM(F) 9. DETERMINE ROOF AND SIDING COVERING ADJUSTMENT: (IF SHINGLE COVERING, ADD 500 GPM) ADJUSTMENT: ;-' ;';' GPM (G) 10. COMPUTE ESTIMATED FIRE FLOW REQUIRED: (IF D+E+F+G IS LESS THAN 500 GPM, INSERT 500 GPM) (IF D+E+F+G IS GREATER THAN 12,000 GPM, INSERT 12,000 GPM) (D+E+F+G) REQUIRED FIRE FLOW: $ GPM (H) 11. SIGNED: DATE: /// 4 /99n RENTON PLANNING DIVISION ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: 6-ko\ DATE CIRCULATED: July 6, 1990 COMMENTS DUE: July 25, 1990 EFC-072-90 , APPLICATION NO(S): SA-072-90 PROPONENT: City of Renton, Parks&Recreation PROJECT TITLE: Cedar River Park Shop Improvements BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Create'a functional park maintenance building from the old Taco Time building, construct a new shed (approximately 140'x 80'), an outdoor daycare area and enlarge the parking area. LOCATION: 1911 Maple Valley Highway SITE AREA: 18.6 acres BUILDING AREA (gross): 18,100 Total IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS: PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth 2. Air 3. Water • :; s 4. Plants , 5. Animals 6. Energy&Natural Resources 7. Environmental Health 8. Land&Shoreline Use • 9. Housing 1. 10. Aesthetics . 11. Light&Glare ' 12. Recreation 13. Historic&Cultural Preservation 14. Transportation 15. Public Services 16. Utilities COMMENTS: �•14 .S . f .-/. tit 67g_ 57a4-'2, oA„ S e ram' C Aa¢vtFEir. sy ,.y 3e r,sreb 0/0 Si,-yes, C 11.35ac 3,70",‘ stha� We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. 0.-(/ /Z 4 4,0,---.-... "" y Signature of �� irector or Authorized Representative Date _ _2 • RENTON PLANNING DIVISION DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF-072-90 APPLICATION NO(S).: SA-072-90 PROPONENT: City of Renton, Parks&Recreation PROJECT TITLE: Cedar River Park Shop Improvements BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Create a functional parks maintenance building from the old Taco Time building, construct a new shed (approximately 140'x 80'), and enlarge the parking area. LOCATION: 1911 Maple Valley Highway TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION.? CURRENT PLANNING LONG RANGE PLANNING PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5:00 P.M. ON July 25, 1990. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: e., APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF RENTON JUL - 91990 HE-cove) DATE: -2( i( '7° SIGNATUR. OF 'IRE TOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV.5/90 , - 1 RENTON PLANNING DIVISION ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: pa hc ___• DATE CIRCULATED: July 6, 1990 COMMENTS DUE: July 25, 1990 EFC-072-90 APPLICATION NO(S): SA-072-90 PROPONENT: City of Renton, Parks&Recreation PROJECT TITLE: Cedar River Park Shop Improvements BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Create'a functional park maintenance building from the old Taco Time building, construct a new shed (approximately 140'x 80'), an outdoor daycare area and enlarge the parking area. LOCATION: 1911 Maple Valley Highway - SITE AREA: 18.6 acres BUILDING AREA(gross): 18,100 Total IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL LEMENTS: PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth 2. Air 3. Water 4. Plants 5. Animals 6. Energy&Natural Resources 2 7. Environmental Health 8. Land &Shoreline Use 9. Housing 10. Aesthetics 11. Light&Glare 12. Recreation , 13. Historic&Cultural Preservation 14. Transportation 15. Public Services l/ 16. Utilities COMMENTS: We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. 12-4-Altir Signature of Director or uthorized presentative Date ---a RE;NTON PLANNING DIVISION ° -o� %c DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET a�� <2 9�ob,l< ECF-072-90 APPLICATION NO(S).:, SA-072-90 PROPONENT: City of Renton, Parks&Recreation PROJECT TITLE: Cedar River Park Shop Improvements BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:: Create a functional parks maintenance building from the old Taco Time building, construct a new shed (approximately 140'x 80'),and enlarge the parking area. LOCATION: 1911 Maple Valley Highway TO: . PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU X POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION CURRENT PLANNING LONG RANGE PLANNING PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5:00 P.M. ON July 25, 1990. REVI -WING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: pb 1 i cam, APPROVED ` APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED ,,,l(A, � f-�ry� DATE: �� 1� 1(� ' SIGNATURE OF DIR CTOR.OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE ' REV.5/90 4 RENTON PLANNING DIVISION yi '4 6 s ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET ° °• ' REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: LO(3. .LtM \t DATE CIRCULATED: July 6, 1990 COMMENTS DUE: July 25, 1990 • EFC-072-90 APPLICATION NO(S): SA-072-90 PROPONENT: City of Renton, Parks&Recreation PROJECT TITLE: Cedar River Park Shop Improvements BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Create a functional park maintenance building from the old Taco Time building, construct a new shed (approximately 140'x 80'),an outdoor daycare area and enlarge the parking area. LOCATION: 1911 Maple Valley Highway SITE AREA: 18.6 acres BUILDING AREA(gross): 18,100 Total IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS: PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth 2. Air • 3. Water 4. Plants 5. Animals 6. Energy&Natural Resources 7. Environmental Health 8. Land&Shoreline Use • 9. Housing 10. Aesthetics 11. Light&Glare 12. Recreation 13. Historic&Cultural Preservation 14. Transportation 15. Public Services 16. Utilities x x COMMENTS: - ice awmg-v+cs dN p,-ertsMiCo 9E El°ptvE pep PULbw ;R.EViEw 14 cerz. SU 153 ELT i lkV'to v L-1+EMrs /0, TriN, 20w E 1, eG P-ChrtTM P . A . We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date all v� ot,. � JUL 0 9 1990 °�4. is,, RENTON PLANNING DIVISION aQ F4 it CITY OF REN J uN .. 0 o,�, PUBLIC WORKS DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET � 1000 CUSTOMER SERVICESSej ECF-072-90 APPLICATION NO(S).: SA-072-90 PROPONENT: City of Renton, Parks&Recreation PROJECT TITLE: Cedar River Park Shop Improvements BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Create a functional parks maintenance building from the old Taco Time building, construct a new shed (approximately 140'x 80'),and enlarge the parking area. LOCATION: 19 11 Maple Valley Highway TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: • ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING'DIVISION CURRENT PLANNING LONG RANGE PLANNING PARKS AND ��RECREATION DEPARTMENT i( OTHERS: fit/ (l1---1 COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5:00 P.M. ON July 25, 1990. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: W AIT IA I(U1 Y all erA APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS X NOT APPROVED PRO POSrrO siRuc(uRE ENCRahcNES ow( EXiSiir & Mm0 42" Ttzoo uw6 (S1f ArAtkED PcAN of &XiSzia6 urtu1itis) (01401'tiol of I�((, CQt4SI t/Cfl& M,uYT Mt-et TficoN4 kAtiifE2 ? .a1Ect-io&J aRCIKA cE 1&P°nJ iTs PhSS Me ) fat WOW i N -VW 'i ov A &.0 rZ "pRa1C-cri ow A . DATE: 7 'i ?- O SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE y}�/� REV.5/90 r fir \ \( > r r ,.<4..f..\\ \ \ i %.,500 , _......_ z. \� N 17°i OGv t.cosso\ oio . ‘. \ \\--\ \\\\_%/,‘, . 0"4:0.4t _ \ o /7t�9.4 ' s5147 i B - �r5 \r- \ \ 0 4vol• -fe"- *--. - .. , 7, C----- 44 i \r\\... EGBON� L r i 1 „ CU9 iP/ (. ' ` TH�'UST BLOC.C� /.E sirs l "r \-, \ 9 )\ \ .1 \\ \ h \ \ i. 1 i\ i - \ ........_..\\\.„:"\'''''-, \ ....L t • / i i vARY/N /•om \ $ - + I I N coA/c. 4 \ l/f4),:::.)/r. 4N4. -.-.../ I/' I Mc 1 ,� .41\1 / \.\ �8 2.3 �3. 7 �T '` vM' ,,6,1/4D '-`‘. \ \ 1%4 '\...) •, • ' \ II ITT` L.1. r c ft " oL,ID \//,// 47.'3 7)_ . V . 1CP (?) Z o 16" �/ 2 , f 3. �3 .__-c 4..,„-- �r \ .,3 ,tir . . '.,.._. \ \\5 .E4/. 49. 0 (770./F2) - ` \ w/TN �us►r mock )4 Ye-L \,J \ , , i.ik tr jGi ... E.�.4:1 A=.4y/ • . ' -,, ,.,,./).. 96 1.10 t,tr ii..1,1,/..),(,:.,;:.,//‘././ " ,1,04.,,, z ,_ \,5a,, _t KT . -./ - ENS of , / \ \ f3 �, NEW I /_ ;\ 17 e>.,7 50 • • • _k,6\ ‘\ ./,. ,o i 1d O •.._. ' L6*. DIT p �1 TO `TI E IQ TF�T �. C� ,' ca i¢ 4____\____E, W/ : \ 'ice mow• N-1 T x r�, B ( v / ?' jrbb)•,, � �/M 47, 4 ' 4 I3 ti'� FL �2. L, I� f7.Z►o e-J '0 / ¢ '62 (/z� oni �- / ��4 K L , .$sT ; L .r �;, ; \ � -\ LE 1 . �To �:v, E1e I EGTi� 10 A.144 i ENO -: V B L1 h, / I 1. �'' ,moo c " �, ,' i Cf' �`�UTTEh� / \� Zv4 MTOr" 0.0.1'..7 ' •••'" • LV� a /� \\N\‘-'" 47, 7 , 4 '/://7 i .4 (' \ \ • .\/. ,. <., . /'0 ." • • • / 'r ,f 4 \ \\\. N. .\ , -"13 : '16) .--i. SI LT \ , ./ -1-' 40's Si' / \ \ . 12 (o ri%E h�J }c FL ,s, • / >' • i s ag / v �L rc t`'17 W - ItIkT ' / I1r CO 0 L F �' to° 'I7 I(� / \ ,. .� / \ /RIM + 4 7.19' c TH ST t LoG ., ► k s. /1 ,,,,lix cs ‘‘, . . „'� ' ► i 17S,Soo _ -, z -r,:, 14 - r 1 r— i 1 , i ; �� A e-4wic _T / to AID av 6' 131.0•K/ hel K EX Sr MN d, ' 6"' se 402 . /1 8 ' CO NC 0 33.88 m tJ OrE , RE /I�IC./.1 Q IS ►-►A, c_ -1,A,LL a x- 1 k 1 , t- RENTON PLANNING DIVISION ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Sf T DATE CIRCULATED: July 6, 1990 COMMENTS DUE: July 25, 1990 °444 �/Itt EFC-072-90 oF,gs/ APPLICATION NO(S): SA-072-90 40� ® ' F,�.o40� '`Y90 PROPONENT: City of Renton, Parks&Recreation PROJECT TITLE: Cedar River Park Shop,Improvements BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Create a"functional park maintenance building from the old Taco Time building, construct a new shed (approximately 140'x 80'), an outdoor daycare area and enlarge the parking area. LOCATION: 1911 Maple Valley Highway, SITE AREA: 18.6 acres BUILDING AREA(gross): 18,100 Total IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS: PROBABLE , " PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT , IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth 2. Air 3. Water 4. Plants • 5. Animals . 6. Energy&Natural Resources 7. Environmental Health 8. Land &Shoreline Use 9. Housing 10. Aesthetics 11. Light&Glare 12. Recreation i•. 13. Historic&Cultural Preservation 14. Transportation 15. Public Services 16. Utilities COMMENTS: /1/b .V/N" l To, � y,f rl'1/•G f,4-.-, 74", S6cu,e4 77/1/S Arc2,(3)- O 4514 f✓U. /S iA-7 Z v 'v t o 4,4 . s We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Director or Authorized Repre ert`ative, Date . lY r42Ew2D, JUL 0 6 1990 CITY OF REIN ON RENTON PLANNING DIVISION PUBLIC WORKS DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET CUSTOMER SERVICES ECF-072-90 APPLICATION NO(S).: SA-072-90 PROPONENT: City of Renton, Parks&Recreation PROJECT TITLE: Cedar River Park Shop Improvements BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:- Create a functional parks maintenance building from the old Taco Time building, construct a new shed (approximately 140'x 80'), and enlarge the parking area. LOCATION: 1911 Maple Valley Highway TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT,DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION ' CURRENT PLANNING LONG RANGE PLANNING PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: 4 COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5:00 P.M. ON July 25, 1990. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: APPROVED ! APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED • /9e�. DATE: r 0 SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUT-IORIZED REPRESENTATIVE 1 REV.5/90 t1 • 4•e r e , RENTON PLANNING DIVISION ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: ' "h/1Y1 DATE CIRCULATED: July 6, 1990 COMMENTS DUE: July 25, 1990 EFC-072-90 APPLICATION NO(S): SA-072-90 PROPONENT: City of Renton, Parks&Recreation PROJECT TITLE: Cedar River Park Shop Improvements BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Create a functional park maintenance building from the old Taco Time building, construct a new shed (approximately 140'x 80'), an outdoor daycare area and enlarge the parking area. LOCATION: 1911 Maple Valley Highway SITE AREA: 18.6 acres BUILDING AREA(gross): 18,100 Total IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL-ELEMENTS: PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT , NECESSARY 1. Earth 2. Air ' s' 3. Water 4. Plants 5. Animals 6. Energy&Natural Resources 7. Environmental Health 8. Land &Shoreline Use 9. Housing 10. Aesthetics 11. Light&Glare 12. Recreation - 13. Historic&Cultural Preservation 14. Transportation 15. Public Services 16. Utilities COMMENTS: Sal D Ar6w P1.1 au-4 E Syf 1 G1 (.v 177{ 5G 4 Pa S, c,Q s J a'("/ I4 p4764 sEPA,%fei-ny e 4,19 Apt/Vtr am 71�� SG�rT�Y/ 4)7 stP c5 F of C "6 w ASP t- 7 4 etA 5- w,v) j5144 <4 nrMtEC TLE?/L/' b C /V Ew �0„p1- rd We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. 7-17- 70 Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date 2100%1 p14N Q 6 1990 c"Y°'�R°1/1,91° JUL REN i ON RENTON PLANNING DIVISION Atte ��,°�b CITY OF 0 PUBLIC WORKS DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET � '990 CUSTOMER SERVICES �4 1 � S-. ECF-072-90 APPLICATION NO(S).: SA-072-90 PROPONENT: City of Renton, Parks &Recreation PROJECT TITLE: Cedar River Park Shop Improvements BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:. Create a functional parks maintenance building from the old Taco Time building, construct a new shed (approximately 140'x 80'),and enlarge the parking area. LOCATION: 1911 Maple Valley Highway TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION'` CURRENT PLANNING LONG RANGE PLANNING PARKS AND ECREATION DEPARTMENT ?I\ OTHERS:COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5:00 P.M. ON July 25, 1990. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS x NOT APPROVED • 7 r/�'—y' DATE: SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV.5/90 RENTON PLANNING DIVISION ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: (...)—LVVIexit ePleLyk. DATE CIRCULATED: July 6, 1990 COMMENTS DUE: July 25, 1990 EFC-072-90 APPLICATION NO(S): SA-072-90 PROPONENT: City of Renton, Parks&Recreation PROJECT TITLE: Cedar River Park Shop Improvements BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Create a functional park maintenance building from the old Taco Time building, construct a new shed (approximately 140'x 80'), an outdoor daycare area and enlarge the parking area. LOCATION: 1911 Maple Valley Highway SITE AREA: 18.6 acres BUILDING AREA(gross): 18,100 Total IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS: PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth 2. Air 3. Water 4. Plants 5. Animals 6. Energy&Natural Resources 7. Environmental Health 8. Land &Shoreline Use 9. Housing 10. Aesthetics 11. Light&Glare 12. Recreation 13. Historic&Cultural Preservation 14. Transportation 15. Public Services 16. Utilities COMMENTS: V w'Luc/4 1- n" rvL-Q—LILLe), . We have reviewed this application with particular attention o those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. fit/4.441k, A" 1 f.-b Signature of Director or Aut rized Representative Date RENTON PLANNING DIVISION DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF-072-90 APPLICATION NO(S).: SA-072-90 PROPONENT: City of Renton, Parks &Recreation PROJECT TITLE: Cedar River Park Shop Improvements BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Create a functional parks maintenance building from the old Taco Time building, construct a new shed (approximately 140'x 80'), and enlarge the parking area. LOCATION: 1911 Maple Valley Highway TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION CURRENT PLANNING LONG RANGE PLANNING PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5:00 P.M. ON July 25, 1990. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: Q.-L.14Y er\ APPROVED ✓ APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED DATE: 1' 6 )q SIGNATURE OF DIRECTO OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 5/90 `' :'= CIT OF RENTON Public Works Department Earl Clymer, Mayor Lynn Guttmann,Director July 6, 1990 City of Renton, Parks & Recreation Dept. 200 Mill Ave. S. Renton, Wa 98055 SUBJECT: Cedar River Park Shop Improvement QF;s-R-072-cio. Dear Mr. Berg: The Planning Division of the City:of:,Renton has formally accepted the above-referenced application for preliminary review. It is tentatively scheduled for consideration by the Technical Advisory Committee on August 3, 1990. Within three days of that review, you will be notified in writing that: 1) your application is complete and has been scheduled for environmental review and determination, or 2) that additional information is required to continue processing your application for environmental review. Please contact me, at 235-2550, if you have any questions. Sincerely, Mark R. Pywel{AICP Project Manager . I i accptltr/MRP/kac 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2631 PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF RENTON JUL ® 5 1990 CITY OF RENTON ��flJI MEMORANDUM DATE: July 5, 1990 TO: Laureen Nicholay FROM: Randy Berg SUBJECT: Cedar River Park Application for Site Plan Approval The proposed Cedar River Park Maintenance Facility will be used. as a general tool & vehicle storage area. Because of the sensitive nature of Park and it's relationship to the aquifer we Do Not intend to store any fertilizers, herbicides 'or pesticides at this facility. These materials will be kept at the First and Williams facility where they are now stored. The proposed facility will be used to store hand and power tools, and as an off hours parking lot for maintenance vehicles. Gasoline will undoubtedly be kept on the site in one to five gallon containers. All petroleum products will be stored in an approved manner as dictated by ordinance. The storage yard will also be used to stock pile planting materials ( trees, shrubs & ground covers) , topsoil, sand and gravels. If you require clarification or further information please contact our office. cc: Sam Chastain crpsp •..::..:::....:....::•:.::.:.:•::..•::.�::..::..::..�::::.�:::::::::......CO...IVIUNI I, .PME . ..DEEA�tTMENP...................... ........... AST.ER.APPLI.� ..�T'10.N........................................ .... ;:>::: <:;�:::;;::;::::::::»>:;>:::>::::>:::�:::: O NEP.►►. ...... ... ........................... ::TYPES:OFF>AP:PLI:OATS:O�IV & F':EE':5 . NAME: _'REZONE $ CITY QFII;NTTJ.N:L,''`P.ARKS &'.RECREATION SPECIAL PERMIT $ J d �, '' � _TEMPORARY PERMIT $ ADDRI.SS•' 9�aC 4 a °o a *CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT $ , o 20G' n MII,TL 1vv./6S o`� ,44 SITE PLAN APPROVAL $ 'N/A SPECIAL PERMIT $ • CITY:-: `. �>> ' � ZIP: GRADE&FILL PERMIT $ y �" ,-. 00, . a RENTO1 oR nt: o ' � ,�'• 98055 (NO.CU.YDS: ) o 5 _'VARIANCE $ TELEPHONE N':JMDl (FROM SECIION: • ) 277-5528 'WAIVER $ ROUTINE VEGETATION CONTACT PER:SO N.:AP P.:..1 MANAGEMENT PERMIT $ NAME: (*JUSTIFICATION REQUIRED) RANDY BERG ADDRESS: SUBDIVISION: $ 200 MILL AVE. .S. LOT LINE ADJUS 1 MENT $ CITY: ZIP: _SHORT PLAT $ RENTON 98055 TENTATIVE PLAT $ _PRELIMINARY PLAT $_ TELEPHONE NUMBER _FINAL PLAT 277-5528 NO.OF LOTS: • PLAT NAME: PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAME: PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: $ PARKS SHOPS IMPROVEMENT._ PRELIMINARY FINAL PROPERTY/PROJECT ADDRESS(S)/LOCATION: 1911 MAPLE VALLEY HIGHWAY BINDING SITE PLAN: $ KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER(S): MOBILE HOME PARKS: $ _TENTATIVE EXITING LAND USE(S): _PRELIMINARY FINAL EXISTING._IMPROVED MUNICIPLE PARK PARK NAME: EXISTING ZONING: P 1 _ NO.OF SPACES: X ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW $ PROPOSED LAND USE(S): PROJECT VALUE: $ EXISTING IMPROVED MUNICIPLE PARK SENSITTVEAREA: XES APA: y1 2 OTHER N/A SEWER MORATORIUM AREA: YES NO PROPOSED ZONING: pi TOTAL FEES: • $ SITE AREA(SQ.FT.OR ACREAGE): DATE PAID: POSTAGE PROVIDED: YES NO 810,400 SQ. FT. (18.6 ACRES) lt..;:-:: e Number;:::•:.:.. .. :.: :. ::::::::::::. :::.: :. :::::::::::.:...::.:::. ..:. :::::::....::::::•::...: :•::•::....:::::::::...::::•::::::•:: . :::::-:z::::<•. ' • > :::::::>:<:;: >: S G LLA....PP.....rk.....TP..... ..:�R:..: •..:;:::::;:>::::::>:::<::>::::»::»>::::>:::::::::>:::::::::::<:::;;>::;::>::>:.:>>::><:;;<:»::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::<:»>:::>:::�::::::::::: :::::Y::AAD.;:•>:.:.W...:.:.:>:PUD.;;:::FP•. D::::.SM:::. ME�:<:�:E7viH ::.:::::.MHP�::::$•p•::::::.:::::::..::::::::::::::::::::::.�:::::::. :. :. ::... 3:::::.:::::::::::. :::•;;:::.::::.:::::.:::::::::::::::::.::.:::::.:::::..::. :::::::::.li:xrdr�::s a,e:ls:.re tired:. lease;att2chase �rate.:sh�ef ..::::::::::.::::::.::::..:...::::::.::..::.:.:::;:.::.;;:.;:.::. :;<.; • • ATTATCHFD . • • • • • • • I , :.; .;.:.;.:.;::...>:::.::.;.... .. ... ..AFFIDAVIT... ..>.:.::..::..:;..:.:...;:.::...:..<:.::::;.:;:::;:: . .. • • • • • • • I, uANTW RFRG , being duly sworn, declare that I am (please check one) g the authorized representative to act for the property owner,_ the owner of the property involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge.and belief. SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS `5 AY OF .J�it e 19 96 • NOTARY B IN AND FOR THE STATE OF WAS INGTON,RESIDING AT: • • Name,of;hl otary Public)' (Si re of Owner) - , /8 2 >y (Addre F);, (Address) (City/State f Zip)" (City/State/Zip) 010 S— A5-V, 235 Z5 G s (Telephone) • (Telephone) • . Acceptance of this application and required filing fee does not constitute a complete application. Plans and other material , required.to constitute a complete application are listed in the"Application Procedure." r1 RinMastr 2/90 . ._ . ;; `o-12-1 c • • • • CT 0 »� >:.:KLI T: .VIR �:O iV M E NTA L�:CH E C S N Purpose of Checklist: • • The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), Chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probably • significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. • Instructions for Applicants: This environmental checklist ask you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies. .use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise'it!:omatidn known, or give the best description you can. You must answer-each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer,the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the.answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply'. Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. • The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of'land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impacts. Use of Checklist for Nonproject Proposals: (Please Type or Print Legibly) • Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered ='does not apply". IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D). For nonproject actions (actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs), the . references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: PLANNING DIVISION PARKS SHOP IMPROVEMENTS CITY OF RENTON 2. Name of applicant: JUL ® 1 1990 RANDY BERG EGt V it Lie • 3. ' Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: 200 MILL AVE. S. RENTON, WA. 98055 PHONE: 235-2560 4. Date checklist prepared: June 7, 1990 5. Agency requesting checklist: CITY OF RENTON, DEPT. OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPEMENT -2- • 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Work on project to be commenced as soon as possible,and completed Sept./Oct. 1990. 7: Do you have any plans for future additions, expansions, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. NO 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. Application for site plan approval 9 Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property 'covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. NO 10. List any governmental approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. tl, NO I1. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. The project includes expanding an existing storage yard at the new Parks Shop Building, expanding existing parking within the park and adding a new childrens play area. All of this work is to be done on the existing Cedar River Park site. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topography map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. Work is to be performed behind the building at 1911 Maple Valley Highway and next to the Renton Community Center at 1717 Maple Valley Highway,all within Section 17, Township 23, Range 5, W.M. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site (circle one); at rolling, hilly, steep, slopes, mountainous, other b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope?) 8% c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, scaly, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. GLacial Till—Pit Run d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. NO -3- e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. No fill material to be brought in nor to be taken from the site. Minor grading will be required for drainage. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. NO g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? approximately 38% h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: 2. AIR N/A a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Some dust will be caused by construction. b. Are there any off-site sources of emission? NO c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: N/A 3. WATER a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. The Cedar River forms the southern boundary of the site but is over 200 ft. from all proposed improvements. 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. NO 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. NONE 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. Type I. C.B. 's will be installed to collect any runoff from paved sites and be diverted to an existing drainage system. 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. None of the planned improvements are within the 100 yr, floodplain. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. NO -4- . b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. NO 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. NONE c. Water Runoff (including storm water): I) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection', and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow?I Will this water flow into other waters, If so, describe. Surface runoff on newly paved areas will be diverted into existing storm drainage systems and will use an existing oil-water separater. 2) Could waste material enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. NO d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: NONE 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: deciduous tree: alder, aspen, other - ASH evergreen tree:4.1Er ces ar'QED, other rubs crop or grain wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants: water lily, eel grass, milfoil, other other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? NONE c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. NONE d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measure to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: New landscaping will enhance existing landscape design. 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: Birds: ,. ero , eagle, :sngbirds other Mammals. •eer, bear, elk, beaver, other Fish: bass, a mon 'trout erring, shellfish, other CARP -5- b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. NONE c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain YES- The Cedar River is a major Salmon migration route. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: NONE 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, wood, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. No utilities are planned for the proposed improvements. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. NO c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: NONE 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. NO 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. Existing emergency services now serving the park will continue without change 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: NONE b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the areas which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? Road and auto noise from 1405 and Maple Valley Highway, and equipment noise from Stoneway Concrete Plant. 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Some traffic noise and construction noise can be anticipated. Construction hours for Stoneway are 7a.m. to 6p.m. weekdays. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: NONE 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? The current site is an existing municipal improved park that is neighbored to the east by Stoneway Concrete Company, to the north by Maple Valley Highway and to the west by I-405. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. NO -6- c. Describe any structures on the site. A municipal community recreation center and Carco Theatre, two well houses, a chlorination building and restrooms. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? NO e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? P1 f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Park g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? N/A h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. NO i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? Approximately 10 people will work in the new park shops (subject to seasonal variations.) j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? NONE k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: N/A 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. NONE b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. N/A c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: N/A 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed. N/A b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? NONE c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: N/A 11. Light and Glare -7-- a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? NONE b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? NO c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? NONE d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: NONE 12. Recreation a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? Active and passive outdoor recreation and gymnasium, raquetball and other indoor recreational opportunities are now available on the site. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. NO c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: Increasing the available parking on the site will enhance recreational opportunities. 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. NO b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. NONE c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: NONE -8- • I4. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed' access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. Entry to the site from Maple Valley Highway, no changes are planned relating to proposed improvements. b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate.1 distance to the nearest transit stop? NO— Nearest transit stop is approximately 1/4 mile from park on Maple Valley Highway. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would, the project eliminate?' The site now has 325 parking stalls and proposed improvements will add approximately 50 additional stalls. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private? NO e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? , If so, generally describe. ti NO f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. NONE g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: NONE 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. NO b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. NONE 16. Utilities a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: ectricit natural gas, . Allaggl .elephone,..anitary seNireD septic system, other. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. NONE ! i h ; -9- C. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Proponent: — Name Printed: ;/ ��c//? • i5l-'/c��- / -10- D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (This sheet should only be used for actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs. Do not use this sheet for project actions.) Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction, with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms. 1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air;; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life? Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are: 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? ' -11- Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Proponent: Name Printed: 1 y ,. 3 ,„ •• , . -.. tsif - - �ir,•. liatob ,.-. r'G", R-..,,, • ' 'ram ' 3. c"- -�� t„• : 0 P. v i, �. � max: /r ' " ^ �, Yam„-,••:�. l ..... �• �- fir. L y /' ' ° �.. i" �1 2 t Vie"'....; .' .. ,f....a.. • S. V,J) 1 l:A a� .1- • M ? ..... S *�Y� lit _ a +!y•.�' C• NO.E3862 Durascape® *GS Straight tot slide,horizontal ladder,bub- ,. ble panel,steering wheel enclosure,tot swing,vertical enclosure.Available in expanded metal or wood decks. '� NO.E3862 Durascape,ground space le ' _ _ i 17' x 16'6". %'`7 i -44i.4 .%; ''''-'':,' ' -2--7::-:1:-,l'r.----.'-':::i.4.‘, .."' e! i'.'-,: '\ '' '4. 4;- , xt 1 _ r�4 ✓ i h / J . 07, „1/44\, ....,_ ..�n'.�.V.`,�' :1w D. Bridge Walk 1•! u— ' Fun for a crowd of youngsters.Curved tot PLANNING DIVISION '��/�� III slide,bubble panel,tire swing,aluminum CITY OF RF_NTON uprights,suspension bridge,steering ®'i"� wheel enclosure,space climb,vertical JUL — 1 1990 ® rung enclosure.Available in expanded metal or wood decks. NO. E3863 Bridge Walk,ground space to LA � ' 11'6"x29'. OWNER: City of Renton ADDRESS: 1717 Maple Valley Highway RING COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER: TL-13 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: That portion of government lot 4 lying in the west 1/2 and southwest 1/4 of the northeast 1/4 and southeast 1/4 of Section 17, Range 23, Township 05, W.M.; lying between Columbia and Puget Sound right-of-way and Renton-Maple Valley Road and northerly of a line beginning on the westernly margin of said road, 80 feet northwesterly from intersection of south line of northeast 1/4 of said section; thence south 47°-52'-00" west for a distance 273.22 feet of said section; thence south 88°-26'-00" west for a distance of 251.95 feet; thence south 39°-24'-35" west for a distance of 73.20 feet; thence north 79°04'-40" west for a distance of 176.04 feet; thence south 27°-52'-27" west; less State Highway; • • • • PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF FEN TON • JUL ® 1 1990 PROJECT NARRATIVE The object of our proposal is to create a functional PParks Maintenance Building at Cedar River Park. The acquisition of the former Taco Time property for the purpose of a Parks Maintenance Building was approved by the City Council. The Taco Time building is located at 1911 Maple Valley Highway and is the planned site for the new Shops Building. Plans for this site include; the removal of the existing fence around the building, expanding the Maintenance yard and enclosing it with a new screening fence. Also, the addition of crushed rock and asphalt surface areas and a proposed shed building (approximate size 180 ft. x 40 ft. ) , planned for the site. Adjacent to the planned Parks Maintenance Building site is a proposed over- flow parking lot. The lot will be an asphalt pavement with a 6" concrete curb. This lot will accommodate Carco Theatre events as well as over-flow parking from other recreational activities that take place in the park. The lot will provide approximately 50 additional parking stalls. Planned landscaping for both of the above mentioned projects will coincide with the landscape materials already being used in the park. Also planned for the site is a new outdoor daycare area for the Community Center. This area will be approximately 900 sq. ft. of a cushioned surface for recreational use. A 3 ft. concrete surround will enclose the area. Suggested play equipment is tot oriented and would not exceed 6 ft. in height. This portion of the proposal will be funded by a Renton Kiwana's Club donation. t PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF RENTON JUL - 1 1990 tGE VED