Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
LUA90-078
(.AIW AV .h. OAKIX.AVM. h,(Join UTAy .00 7I !! _ v 1 �- I $f Zbil INN // / nw� `�... I • / //7 •7 i C.--:•••-z., ----------... -7 g L'\, /- \ 1 / 1! ¢ / —� / I EXISTING / iiiiiiiiiii 4 g I i-�� \J\` ` • / ►` / I FEMA 24.0617-1 / 9 / ,/ ;J PARKING / �� i /0 / R_=/ r-> i� GARAGE • / •/ /� II %// ,�' / / j O/, o' S al // — / =� / I p IT / Ia (4fKlhWAy / //OFFI / TAIL /FLooDCOM )AsroF1 / .��_, / itirIIy 7 //1Y 1 t / • / 1 // I // '�afw .,,eiwl ur, ':%' / ���-" IEXISTING6 I C\\ r fH 15Rlp( w vn Arrtm..' :� -/'"- • / /FEmA 24.o\ I /. I / /���\�� ux°eora°o ('ram'"/rnucrnus�aur nn`vs°acn�tt+kNa �% / ��' //' \ I /CA/C / \ r.L" (5F(ra KW.WA ,woo o re',c�Kawwc • /�' ��' /�,�I J\I /!. \ • L1, LS GARAGE FLOOR FCS TO 6° *;�,1 /, RETAIL / �� • °o o"P-c.40 ^r rMr q.v�✓c t .%� / III,IFC3 1 U / µµpp rtq ri1,0/a/v b °� ` uaGFero °ypNrtNo•9 Q ry L'ir �.� '1'IIi.� / ' O l `7 , ..,\, .. . ,$%% [YOuu �,� �7 I/_��.. \rwS SAN // 1/11 \ • l l O o r °"' . ! "d" au�'zea" Lam p .i iffil1 1 N �� i ! Air _� l III UNtiERbrficov laNrL?Jy41p66(PA(ONGTTI \� J \\\ 1,..........; �BYFAssW '`" ,,/( I/ / , % % / I f�\ '`�'�;14 4 J�///J PAy'N�v6 / / E li 1,/ 1 \ �i� OIWS STORM 'i / tl IJ I 1 w--__-'C � �� / q II 1 / To EXIST o/ws� N� J j/ / N_ PlJIIAING 1 ti �� j ;iKNS( ✓��� 11 I I\ \�� r� „ 'z L\ \\ e II, / { 4W0 WON tLNh W/ ILI 1 `-1 L.`_� _ IX6 61 �',,'•XISTNG\ C�// / J `� T EXIST OIW rn;ntnilri'rirl: \\ ' •CB TO n° may' "::!..�.mm) / m. 1 In I\ r \ C� =livi ®ruts 7z^��' 4fitt. / Ui \� C.�.` 6GNE�A LINc�1A / I �L w ITER \ / -��rr�. l��i 1�1��� I ,wee °l�FIX EROSION r' ,,J 1` ` �� - v III ,, _ \\ 1. I r _ �r ;Kai rcoxo c_,/ —�\� 5. a 111 \ /� `ram r _ r��` p r lE �/J J •° Wo !;fi :, 4, -_....... ...4.4,W, .„, :i 31/ N�COMPENSATING STORAGE CONCEPTS d,,,,,,,• • o.v.Op 1 ```�� — `�"m�' g,c,` "----1--- 1 161,900 CF E%ISTNG 100 YR FLOOD PLAN YOLUAIE CONCEFf11AL "'�.(�-p" �J — > I / ON6(FiNfON PALL. /� STORM ,O�' y "�`' ���, -/—N i``� / rr 3o.ro / 64,900 CF FUTURE 100 YR FLOOD PLAIN Youxue DRANAGE �`Q ` �.�+i FIX EAos�oN '` L r% r`��, CJ— / 87,100 CF COMPENSATNG STORAGE(FCS)REQUIRED 8' 11'-1��7 \`J 1 Imo\ ---1 \ / 22,300 CF NEW 7r LINE a MANHOLES PLAN ARMOR CFU\tU�1 lQ+' r I——.i FKIhIAKU hfA1�NIG14VIAyr NO 1 �_ -- �I . i lsaoocF GARAGE FLOOR hl� �D% �- �� f— 1 ` 55,900CF UNDERGROUND FCS ----___` ��----. ----` j ,93,900 CF 108%OF REOUIRENFNT JOB#900f� c� 1 , - ____, ;--- 1 I VILLAGE r r---i PLACE NORTH 17L RENTON.WASHINGTON gezEAS .1 1C417.fc UP4II4E13. ezo PC6 64): 'MOM c/IAN4E72, 'NIELS fIKS 441: VI i6 I \L wmina , =mammon CAROM ... - lii • ' . , ••-, ••• .••::-.%*=','-,,,-,1-..-.4-; 4 ....4-',--..,-,, %•.;.'-••••.‘r'7,0:64 la,, =11 I ., —. . .§ !I.`r"'5 -!—e—r- •—• ‘'E:77777-- .,,airgir Aliik.i2W56-44"11- 7'; - -rir711.11,7 /!„... ., 7 S.--,•,..‘" ' --'' •..:- '.';'imi,—,..,i, —:-", 'i'- ['Cr!IIAW, IIIIIW -'-`,-*1* . -AZ. ,- . l'•4F,Ifl;,',16010.-........• ,_-- '4"--, --- -----PAWI-.-, . :.,.. ,- - ..'-_:.,;•,,.----,...i.__ -- ,..,--!---,- , • ___. , iid •v,-,-- ,, ; ••'-' -f- ,!".45„,2 i'"Kilkiki'L L.;.-1- -.1c-mma. f........ .1EiiII ",.•:;/ ",,-%.'''':"..74-.:;FrffY,I:',,, Zr''..: '"1..,,2'., -.'-.L.L16:..- !.1.-...C--..-....-..,... ---f.-: ..:—--.. .........1.1....„.........,............ '.-.. 1r 011!%...1......., c IMMO,.-:...-.a.-.:2.: Mi.:Iwo. imAie=I imemImmEmi, ........",•,•••::t.-'!'',•.. 'AIW--...mm••• ••",".' ' • . ___ m. ..- 11,2,-.2,1tN 776 , •••••••11 0 NSOT eZ,WATUVI 4.41,A fr--V6/DAV/ •#7,•.7 TMA,4' Am, /705,4i,/,-694-66 PIES oN&N.,. , •Re chtvi4e,To ........-7,n GE.E.~WED -Irma ei#046 la .Welza2E./Averc-re , ELS 77#5.9As: ,-,4•Yr ee,-er-e,-,4E P. , 77/t,DAY. fAvg20 i/H6 e.ty. •' Pete,434/4"BB 1.BE .1I'Vr I" BLBE-6BEBV ear-oz.70 JO' ,iiir 4/ . . i i II ,,,,,,,, Ar.azyr eoc.,,e • I..'ft.‘il,." \="‘ 1‘‘'•11=11,W1'\.,11, `•P-RI..,W ‘,•-\=•R‘7--\77. \•:.i,,‘ Zmy kA.-4,2lliM 5 5' . .- ... W1 — 1v3N.,. .vorr: 'iv,' ••4, cluistm:: e x mdmIts-AdAr ............. ........r ,zs' "s' •\V ,,-- • s- , 's, , " ,, •,,',, x• +1` • 1,,, ',,,, -„;;;;r‘,,,..1,;,:‘:.-.:,:.,::‘,",;:"\\,\,,‘-‘,•••—,'"''' \\ '' ''V" en'n"..1 gae.,v-a/Rar&-"244,17445.5- - ES,Ma......--.—.- WIWIliiMieili'lielliiiligr ..MERMIIIiIIIIIIIIINIIIMMIM !Vitrikil)af . Mi....,,, ‘, ,WVA'tt,.\",\MIMMIM\ --R.•,\‘`,‘•=„.,‘,s -...1""",, 1,412w,..\10‘t‘ts*litlitig:iii--1:, ibea2.4a vic - in oin.!4,-qiimme, ,%MEI law • aminimelleillil,,11,,,,,_ i., ,.....,,, = •,,,r ."-V,Jfe, ;'.',1'1" ...:4' ......1,... ....(k., 1— -• ,I•-••• 'LT:4r___...--KArokli,h1r.A.V.,,....._r_...r.„....,,, ,......_ , .„,„......... , —.- ® ——-.--—C)MAR ezam-reA/ Afallf EleY4770N -- — I/10,1W, t- --t I —— I I i 1-1" •••••Mil. M=M11 I I ked6.144/ [ I0••• -I .... 7E-Anita CflAnem-ro I c.9.9A•c,.,-b I r......• Are.E-7h PA'- •mt,a.% I %4i.7.6, MO.941: I I Aaer.051- come ....was sE a). ~-,-ELAWV 7,1 i /10/ea24/N 77LE-..\ .I. 11 i ,,...,,,,,, . em.....14a-• t .....: I 1..-- ._ _. ,H..,..,,N,„•••\•---••••,..,•;-, ,,.; ‘ \' .••••'''Q‘.--. ..‘'‘,. .- ,'",•‘.`„''''', Aliii,.. I-7 i 1=I ,. .i..ir-iiimmmmmmmmm ... ..,. IIIPIIIIIMIER allIMMI 1, am imommommrimmomminammm s-.........----, gffli GARAGE • ' . • ' " , , , / 4 ELEVATIONS V ELEVA mili.!......rarppiesommormninzamm'Emmy, s _ 7, ,,,,,...:____71Ntes. ..,: iiii7.7 m , r il ' - • .s`N.04, ...•.1-4r—1,) - - ' ::" ; ,`...mmigagiagr..1 _, 11! , ,„All. A:, ‘,..11 RE Yleff,d_AIMIIIIIIIIIIIM ,..4.4ii ,, ,_ . rtr :TA 'AIN'ialmormommort ,„ _ —' ' '' 'V.—"ki 7--4-1 f'\:7_14.3f,,: -, . 4.. t5.k 17 • ,P•-at-.,7fi..,-f 51. - , . • • •• .. A N . .- • -- ±.....8:e-qa -11eYB.,,,,rw. ---,N..... 0 mx m ( A5\,04..r ausvArcir 194,..be It...ea in el A-rrAcHmENT#12 • ilnuc fru - ' /`�' VILLAGE M. PLACE nn I � ll r = ":VF4/ - r ` NORTH tool-rid moo?AM AND KIC6 ;; — �. I "� _ - • —\ I D i�?_ sr �� RENTON.WASHINGTON N'VW Avg•h• \` ---i// --<\ / •' T - 1 RENTON VILLAGE ASSOCIATES hOUND MI(hU615N1 / l d r I � � ' � ' » fl u y Callaon a =1'o e i� -- \ -- ` n Vy _ J\\ + \ ' 7VnV1 J IAICEV Mtfolg u ri ---- ,: .mil 'L� 'rreS I, , I \ "°nq _ _G e '[L ( jr 1 :S-\t% \ '(NNf'rWA — . "--73 1 ) - '-' 37) S I ..,--.....,— r=ren ® • �- \ 1 : ) .ie ml ew,\ z i e-p:<x.[rrEr... I o. .—�.a'%s t> \\ `\\\\\\\\\ 'I \ I0 L�— r I — ` ,--* 31 1 I j n 119 E 1 . % :' CS -\ I > 2rn.careen ❑ ' jr\all 0 o 0 1:/, `, \.. -.1 L. 3/ 47 A 1 d I / 1I, ',,' � a>/ a � 6 '\\ \ \ \ \ ( I I I I . � r.S' S s i J / o d IIt a.e . , 1 Vi v, ,j A. ---_— ___ c, /..._, .., \ u o iifNs( � � ._ ' a \ im_ I _ � /_\ v 1- .) ` / 01 kV �.. / 1 \ to Y adZ/////////// \ i JA =:\ , -� _� _... ice- \\ \ I L\\ J s v ar as� fw°6»Qoa n.rl As rlw g' LEGEND .. ... \ \ , --1 \-•\\\\ J r j I�— l `- - \ - I �I v ElIe7.<k oenovaw,7 Ee NG \ \ �- I _/ i / L -�L_ - i�O E.,a�Na rEe r=Eaa,✓ ;�ls.Y✓ f\\� ------ _- i- ice\ ;.__' �\ \ 1 EfnnNe,rover n,.reeve OW gal -,--- t--\1 / - C-� -_-_ 0�37 70.lI/Ne�o.s rA,0&• i --- _ —_ -f I I I -/l1 I ONO 1tr,IVI�N I<Tw -- cclAla/4 t,,Is,4c,aor,,. .u✓.<r.,.wn I �-rJ I 1 nie AWEEcr here ueei J�,,= _ \\ I Y-- 1 i I -- - duo oerEerJ INeuo .w.,.o �G6N61CFd/ UNbF1l \ I t „ 1. rNa TREES O. A7E0 N 1 f�¢HA,N JNO,.S Raeo. —...-- , m'.,r+nem naru,vuumew NEW w°�"" VILLAGE O Q Q Q E�„y 4�N51R✓,,ENY PLACE T ME°, E�. NORTH t✓5NH NyFYr UNE of EJc/5Ty RJtY/E 4 �✓�M�' \ �E/1/.� r SEE cLxruaE.4 REQ. #4.,ti. I NEW ramwr: c ® 1`C=.IFCu% el --_ RENTON VILLAGE ASSOCIATES T �— -- =--- - _ _emu �� _ I f ..,. .14 .ram. ..:`,C; ,.•. •—:,...,_,.i ^. . CaSison •". _ p:y! fit- 'i''=' ++++tt+ir I15n II ....,,,. t aru \,....._zyP.CELUNN' EXI%T/N(a UWZNLE fa PER/p/yN 17LE O WE9T ELN,M,ON REAJA/ U -05 o?HFRw/SE /e — NOTED. 5Y/VT7/EPG PL4NTEQ 0//5/E7-1. 5zeumsgyX / O ._„max, YWINTNEPL PIASTER `, PEE No NEWCON5f12✓GTION� 5Y51EM- NEw WET-Eve-TEA( I.`SEE a -� •I{ ryP. 57BEEPBENT: ® LESION U4f/f FiX1uRE- I ._. ___ EciiI kij i_, _—____._ ._ ,cam__- -___ , ,m o .,. - YlJEN/EO - -- — ae� OWEST'E2Ev EN No/E5 EN cow.e —— 1/8"1...ILE" NNC E,K Pz,s, -43151EN iv 7E NC'PMNIED 44N7- Lb.¢cE2.4/N ma-re,NE -- 8LLE-C.eOE E /0 EN. —- - f M�N AccNCT —— COLON ON EGi/eC -— eva.0/Ng. —— NE1u 4CVOS CLEAR/E -— MAl/N ETVDNy -- KRAOT ',BEE BEE/NONE—Fr a..w /� LAFLL. 4 CI) D �i1� n I (� SYNTNEn� (i ll I' Y PG051FR 6y5�ln Y "•.V P.Y W EErEW Al EXlST'4/VNSTR✓,PoN '' " ^^ W-534, NEW BAEBTRw,ON y t 85 MOV/F/DI I 70.'4/7: :E/ I foltte Oa, A �fo 55" T//. 5gB OE©0 ' �403„N. I °—� _" _ Y�,M1 d A�VEI _ — —{ sa 110 , *::z:.;yy:,�;�. p4 1 — v ` I STRIP CENTER Y•, � '-'_', :-MR y, ,ty`' ;: .A0. `C`3- - w . H ELEVATIONS L '-':', •s. 4"rT�***+"TT,T�TTr1-/r i-H'Hi'H#F 4/RCEL4,N 771E tQ -'-" •:E%/3T�1• 4ws,Ny Y x u=o"c u=e t ~ 89�37 /2 JUNE 9oDx ZLOv /I 7i�"i N/RE/L/N ✓A O. IIr 0 friEr ATTACHMENT#13 A6 . , . P.I.f. EEO.EZEZ-r, ' ' . . , WWF VILLAGE ilii ___ PLACE I411114 ' NORTH pro....-rep BrE.SWEET :'''''Ir 11111 '') .4 1 ooi ix -' '5,2 .5,7.r.,BE- ...±.....or I, "I :.:'.. . l' "II - 7..-...- 71.j __._/0",5 yn,•7,...,e,e-c.,,,Afres. RENTON,WASHINGTON IZEIJTON VILLAGE ASSOCIATES l'Int ei r . !.... , ..: 1 ! . 7IL ca„,..n ....- ..,.....„ ...... 1 Besa.e.0 '1 I BBAEP AlorE5, , (Wen.E,..a9 ,.. • I (2En.ELEr-E) 1 4 Pew H,At•H.-7/7- sf4A, V I- , =' I — 77.A22,4c6-e7C/674. eciwsr7,.‘422.14 . R,' ; 1 L Z.PEE,/PE NEW re..w.40,4-0,,. (Z.., i] . 1 , 7 1.rEEErE,..44. FEE,"EXp,r4.Er./..le. vV '1E I . , 4.„tia. CoMilEE.770./5 1a7../Xer, Eii . 1 ,4a,6,..L9-44Es. P4 bilyE", li. 1 _ __IL ___,_ ._.... ___11_. Sm.*on plq.callIen., . ‘ ....--. • • . • . Marl, ErrlF1V337 ..e.........-........* 0 ELEVA-PON 0 ELEVATION 0 ELEA/Moll ®,.0..V.A1704, 0 RAM ..,....... .. __. CD Ikli-k`i' 5I4N L.1.21w, I.ACE C.WIEL7'211.5 TO BE.taEl....0EV. , 2•A“..B....W.FAces rb BE PA,NTET. FrE9o441E4 671... A,B-E7- E4-5/0E OF ,"1"..5at.sTs.WOE GANHE. -7 7,7 , , r,„„ i -' -., ... .i.Co.,al.a.z.:Efoae4,2.-1,Z.r.f 72,.5.2., ,,,,„ •410B Caorn.ymENr ocree 5c-..0,NE, L2[0...YHEX/E. •amssoon . wu ... VII. 0 WELDED.h.E.AIWA.(3 . :.. I ...i" i. - • wevEv smerrs) ?1 .j _1 •I 4"0 57z-. luse. • t ' _ •Ti NW- -I I fre THE.577..P1,41E. .----..- , , .1 • - • —e0 574.xoio. I , . . ' I ' 1 577.--'MBE-e.y... , I 4 . I • \ st. _ I . I .......... 0 gtava-rioN 0 .ez. v.tnaii 0 ELEVA-rmtV 0 EZVA.-TIOA/ 0 P r— LAW - _ _H_Zrsasea.— ,...- .X".f4E - - • ‘,.... • 0 TOWER ELEMENT- . . 4..omme 14)' 'Le .. lle.”,75,E.YfE r-/Ic"...,E-.7z..,9E• , • . , • De5/4N¢, BY ri/Altel: 74 CoNs'sr• =To ray , ( cm,' SYN7Hc77E- fv-4 • . ' a sroyL 7,40.4‘ 57rA97- si 50)6 5y,v77,..-vc PE457ER.SySTE-.1. f',EavE0E- 7ya. .,2.-022k,.s . • - .:_---- - -'.---.::-----:f--.": .-- --- ----- -- - - --- .--' ----- ---.-7..-- —71:-.,:.------ •Irafrn. Li. .-- ENTRY SIGN _ __ __ ______ _ ...___ 11 .. _ -- • TOWER ELEMENT IL . • I e I:I . . TI-111-FRRIRITIR-141491•44TRTh .EUEFIIGR. -9=RTFFF - i ELEVATIONS ' POR-CeuviNi 771-E 69EZ.E.Tge,. es27-3-7 /2 Jae 90 1.2wa. Po • .5YMEM.) . . . •S.ir lie. 01/1711 EL81A710/11 0,6W77/ELEVs-776V EX/617A/6 5.TOP e-StrnEi_ ' A7 . , , 7DA:4,• , - * , - ATTACHMENT#14 . . , ... . . , • . , . . . . . , . . s r. •......„..._.11,.. 02...-yEa Asseme," , . , . VILLAGE irz,,,,,,,,APRA 1.",-0-A.14V . .. , -.- PIE-LOT PANEL PIASH/N4 IAP,.t,x,r'4 PLACE looNE,. . .. •,.•OP AeoP ay[Jeep/NW, .[ 4.11.4P exoce4. NORTH . mrt•VEAK. .0.00 P.44/1(SEY4V.P.-..\ • . ,•-•-I- I I -- • .. . I A 4 .7 (Exor4 Asse,ne,-Y. !grTonn.V'I,..NH,1-s\oCT.gF\:s --. R . • ;44 . . ' 5r.34/.,.Lr„,...,!. 0.0.1.1-IS I ,...4 °L. . 4 SYNIVEne...PIAMEA. ii fYI.REVEA, 1 i LI. . .. ° a - -•VG-1%,XX-1..,0.af.../&... Callison ...., SR-Bd. ' 4 •'. ' 1 ' , ' t5f.. pe.,°['-‘g. *WA,0,f-rrr . MI _.........A 4iiiiiiiE • 1,- ,...,- , .1 1 pf-Arr EA.SG E. . couoik ap. I , EX'S,-4.•4,-,..,V4. ' i I SYN44.-ree...PASTE. , AU ill t Z,VS ,-4 0 rgl'efl.s/441.I. - (87e..14.4,411,f S Stn../1/07 I 1• ' Typ..51.46.4r,e• 1 T..;2."-''''. • 4 44,,,,4.f..4.5/ t ........,....t...s......<........, • . it/-SSD.,ISS/c.4 ST”..., OceN5. I I • . F1.4:2Oreir....5 FeWM„, 1 I lie A,. -e-t.' .,..,.....„... ... 1 I I I 1---I le -,4,. X1 I r- ''' t " - • ----.1 • •,. .,.._•,-.11_,T: T. / I 1 1 [ I _i • _LI- . 44,410, . 0 C.A4dV.iPY 6 eA=-/c.-.Pvirl. 0-AvaPY z- eTX/57-4,..57X/P,_ 1 . . ......$ /11:,11 gle,= ovce_ . • 4'7x/c5 Sin/A' S., • ' . - . ra0,:e..46,57-AfbrAr. AND PAaNTED,..TypwAt.. I i I— :2 i . . . _ • " .--L .. . N .... __( ouVE.e. s ,A EE ,TE" . • ........,, (P 561- .q.or 1.9 01.54V/Ll.,EPFX. • --........... ---." [.1 . tk:' Ke4E,r ...., M .. .. : • .. . ..,.... [ • .. . . ..........., .: [ ... .... .• . . . . . . I .S. 'H •-•4— ,_ :.. ! 3 II - ! ... - , ., .- 1' . . — • •:1—r-,- :,...... , . 35rarr...4..c.,....r.4-2.40.........,........,s.--,... -3 - • . , ws.....n. . ...... 44 .• • ,... 0. EXTERIOR DETAILS .. _ . ..--- "; . . .... — z... ••- , •,..: 0if37 5..1,. , . . . •%Nur ie0•• ••• •=1•1 i 0 PAXPAL ELEVATipAl ATTACHMENT#15 A8 3/0,1-/e-,- I ® pmez. N. CORNER . ® i3A5/c.-PANEL ..-- . IS/to" iq.ite. . i . VILLAGE PLACE w-"T°°""p NORTH ow-UNIT jY°ItaL Nf. .4 WASH INGTON RENTON N, ASSOCIA]FS i l'' ' . � 11 iv/lamp LEAGy ulP R Calliwn a d 217 u •mnenn I (.02.A0 Ed . Intl Li a ,i, 1,. Y L0001 EN1 OW A AYRAWE ib OfRG¢. OoFr/cE 6L-Qa• 5s'c7IoN is^,r-0 • Ac w,r m ` GooFNN1FF�...v ..fm.. ,/,, DFiL /b..K.ORK>D— S AFT e6cw RaoF PEAY/L. I wwM ONEW RETAIL &1-967. $GTJON .. file"—lo' • • SECTIONS . 04037 II..w.v£90 .u.rro. ATTACHMENT#16 A9 Ps t avO F/LL e.fl6MT. e Ro.8474e���% ' 1 r«:` _ VILLAGE r__ _ _see•ss-sz-q 3z6 o6_ "- .` ,` v,.. /ono PLACE • NORTH • 9,, r' Co• "Sy` ee;VP".\ ';a , N�•ON,WASHINGTON • • '^Y�PY V -�i,'''` ` •.\. '-. •.4 RERENTON VILLAGE ASSOCIATES W • .1 I:' G°I!,x''''.. '4"' 1 \\\\\`3 11 j 1 I,, I °f 1111111i,: '£;; -- ,,r»' 1 III I�hi'�'. I` — • "4.- ':4;'i ' it l 'Il 'li �II111,1;IIl1i"r; ,II !11ii' �r j _ 2 al "- aV II IIII 'I Ili'lli';'i iliihl ;, - sA rss/. - '"` °' \�\\�' ;i.iI!1:i,ll.'.111 ll'111I'lllil l :u3 SEATTLE �I li' OI,'l:ji,j iIIC: SEATTLE C/T✓c/GirT TRUST I '''I';!, 1'' u„•E/z%w !f�,- :.r: °..,0 .,� BANK �/ I I. i,llll!I'r 1C ;J•.'a _ I I;i',la' ,d;, '1,. �:N' II 3` BANK I I i �y 'It' . • 1A'; o� 1 p�l. l ,l,;illtllif�'o'II.l.!.i.,;;':I.',vti _ WAY I:, \a I+ L I i o l'!J:;;;I:i;,i I,r rr,r•i ill. tl f# N,... 1 D 11,.,Jl!1!i;'j;h 4'Ir f,' ;3 A— �rE� ..'�, '.;,.. ...•:/... .. \ I T Id:n�aiili.'I;.Ir,,•�1'. _ :ADY z'3r1. I ���'1� \\� \ i u iil'rl'll ii i'i IIII'(I!i'igl l 1°tt - • E OAROr ,t i _ 1, \\'A �\. ��\ \ I 'IIIi1Illl'IIllljl ii1l l llll"',,o o,1113:t — ....,..... ,s, ___!- .., I STA CHE •1, y0. I_. Z°ou i 1 'I I.I ill li m°o'Mi':%2s:3;'k ° I C.71 L \ I "III I:I;I F�"I �,;I .O ..w> weSrc 1ii IO I N 1 C\•\\, � �� \ � I1 i�'�I j,l'jl .. 1=0(1�4 a , AA N '1 i I��'/:I' -\ / -MF- o T Ul '" `^ I!i1�,1':IIII;I61II,,pI I � . \?L, . I • m ;, Z I �a I 'Ii'IJ;!i!�I I'I Ia�!,�li 8 x; . �' / a I J — [, \ ‘,Ay ` i;;I!r lilll !Ill;fkl'H,1 `1;i l 8 el ze., -/s_ j,,,11 li',''I:' III .,CJ o , W t 6 �f g•-✓19 �51.--""- �_ :p° •� 'it.' \` /II I�'fi,:''''1, a �: � -ill.-..•••'' •scw .a � 2 I c \\\ \\\\ `\ ' • \ o ',l,lil�!!a:l �'1i,1'11 T. ICI III ii 1 iAf .o • qtow..al \T- a=/a•oo 23 0 Q— 1 _, -.1.:1 .f u'I I� ,��,lillP f' ` ' � _.. "-' � m.9a" \ ` ea•se.s:�]���1 1; 7 0. 11 O + � f' o ,III;' . 0;11 AA'...;4';,-`j . : . • - . • 6 ` j _ °•e,• ; O .0\R'7'C\\\ \ l °p'�.��.�„ MALMO-ERNST 1 _ _______ _ 1 d• 0. °�1�,NDSCAP D AfY \\ \ o .lez% N .. ..�c�^L r ' S. O ......,.,., /� ''` T 1 r N O \ ��\\g• tit ® ,`yy P fl r'� Iy w... .9 61 I. a A / �+_� Al •c Eli:" w9�` $° a° r.,« e I ;,� r+ j1i. a.,.. - - ," no •Bn ea \ • \! '!-Z§ .-__--' - wrA �,., .-..._. ��".,�•i'�' x, w..�e • `;r; b3.= '" ` j°v' �- \� \ \ •, /1 'a?.>3. 'ate ,ti*- l.Il��?,':�' - -- - .�—1 �S�W "-... , -.—_- ` - �,1,J'N I t P�y� �,y�` tQ I • - 5AN/Tq: I.EWER MA/N TRUNK[i q °yY•;� Si t, •- m \.•„Amig l& 1 iZdp�;V11 I\ _1 riles'_.SIC•"":3 P ' ILI}:11 imr.r.:eeT.{7�r.'�3: IOC �• b I c - �'T- err-i w • <.. _ .�. ,,,4 ..-Y.. \ ( 1 % a • s' GI_e E - VER•' �: • \ �. ,'\ �ry� 1)�: ,.'r�� R A 1. ri 1 1" r 1,I f 1 .I.. 4 ..,,.,m �-� 5r• BB. �•_� \ \ `,n _Ay I���I I ,ri l�l✓� I Ti I I � I - \• .A ...'�}\\ '?;„ '�� ,t. 3(' / \�,i a•/ % ' r. ..- f ,Y' 1 \ w"_-; •At;" "Ip,,ry._..�o/-— rat vraw t. . ,.,0 c� •g\ b�\\ \ \ : �y° / a•zB.• .... ` • C� ,.e'B ..y..0 I , i1.,1 + ` + -�I_;I!_ -FA-, I /1�,o. .nn. °� b • `\\ �: 1}� tr 1T .- 1 1 • EXISTING• . cay: i = z \ ,� .+?'< 6� ,.i . i. R�' G'1a°--,I,I_ - ,I;tf'°c- _ .. '' E 'CONDITIONS "� y^�` ° Y :` `. y S! y�al� .014°".*PIl Ls.n'° - =y l• oN , \. - _T yi r'� 1 ,m (1,`�:T- E,to< -- //'_'� - , - II-+ '-f....a�- �� -- 1 _fM 8�1,0�97 ./1.JUNEr1°�. • . � G1 1_ y , •• ATTACHMENT#17 l , z i h•i z/ 3 V, N I, 1 1 po ,,,1,1 lig �i"tikisr', a• ;: ;".-1'lf. i „ . ;i : .. 4 , .,i, .. •y M z s2iu.> '._,./10� :,;i :\ r � 4' .E'sYr }• ' t -j •' • I 'i '4'�..,•• • '1, w r 4 I c/. -� �':'' ._ L Ilf' L� s '` "?', � !.'a s,. y T I. ,yam -.la^r• b'°ra, .S �,i1... ..'�! o1/41.1 `i Q 1; . • 4�. '`,jd}p'1.,,1,' .`�S'4r �.;" `"+,•\ N r�,''�%• :•��,rr:.?', �t YY Rn.t. ,y;.,' III • ^ .p Q ,';t�i,7,4 '�NO� r3 ' R' ;0 a ." to ; =' • {`a n oLt;u: ' 5e.O'-„".i,reSi- . } iCl Lcr ;•,yxe >is. a...,'� " 4 ''. ,,..„, •t ;'t. "4�{�tsH^"--'4,_' '."r a f ' > �. _� r• r. v'r m.t jas i r3a~t { ;:1� ,s -pa.,,••' • t ry ++A• I�t• 1 yv, 1- • • �.-'a+. +..4r !If,- y,»:4_ ;�•. kae+ ..�'�`'„r 'kS7=i'f.t �5 +�L+ 4Y \'' f �> � . • ' �. , �L'' +i, /: -: .% 'N. • .fr. • s .f•,� `S.4• � �t+r 1� � i itS•I t �I �-�w.,.� r, y �,{•, ; -i.• l,+*" I � ::' A.'�S. ,;z? a,F�- hti a 'r'! _ .` Y Its -,a>.- YM.+.'L5 / .. E ' ,.'r. ,_>,•... •'A , Y.+f ."'r�'1 i'€r-.'•.�, . ;L ir'��_ teri. NI. it ,� 1 J� r YI i{ , �l • �.t t"e l 3. t t '�-cs "C c •. y .•r 4. '' + _ ]PI 3�, +i•. ..r+.s ,aY�,•l,.l C t t• Y u`'�.'Sl;.�' i t ..ter _•L=-a--1 A 1 "¢....".;'vY of rX "' E a,p r • ---I i. At ; ' 1 ill I— i °r-1.,,,-- c`.‘.---1.- -iitla':' c , i;;;:pi' ,..,,„ Jika y`r• r A� �`i /. w. i `i f U�r �' t-�i .- itr" ; 1 E a �tF7; '�I ..ri s,. ;' r ', ' ► ,• lain ,L.'t x ,/ ,4,4 Jt 7-3 > .• t : ,! • YAt^"Fi�'i^1 T©" �t -fi4.�C l 'qr:-' - •. 40.i.R^Lk i.y • L'I •I. 4 r t \,t.� - �`a-a , i ..' i J ; �,•.3.t:.•5 .:n9�i ,mt►✓ �L°S �,ftiM' •v.:a.ay ', ,a • Y"Y.. '8 a.._ 'w' .� :TF '�` ..•.•.� t� , • *_-u' °ye':::^ 44;0' _ __ 8 s a{.] 'T :fy'.>': of ^} eYa I so.G i:' �� X a . r ,��yy�`ry,,,,,:z:z. ('Y�` `� '' S.a, �' �''4[ty"d• .. "�..t X..w. ry�al s'sa vd S.(t"1 �� Y It "7 _"`- �q 1 '!' \ ✓�" S f�l.i 1y�C%��h• •, y6' - QJ y .'1 ��j. cf _ y ;.. 'f4°•rrt�h ` .p..:a,. ,e'a�v, ,.."" . ,z. _ y,1,,.�,fr r �. 1 \,at'�v 4 ��"Q�.•^� •� { ' .•r '� .q"4,} ' 1•n T-J-':,�'.K .,Sr rn,^ v ZIP err .' i,,: • y „ti eA'��`r�"176.,Li \', , S ,�i)ah�' ��A` �4'°" r �^'r'a� „Fls/p'�r 'Y.>u'..:".",•``..,r.',i!.S� ..� } .�.�}i!Y� ?' �� ,� �p,� wj,x{""�� "tom, Sr 1r .I } 44� V,,:�;t?'.�'•1 ':.s: y 1 �q".' °_ 'lr E . t'\°`, ��{t '�>^ +eke i :;� cag• aAS• !� i Jt' i tj«.btx..:lt- �;•,�, CS' _ Y,r r,,;a'rr'arS•'-,,i� ,' 'a,�` ,��, T .i1 ns ,•,. ,r ',_s ..., ,. x. t`a "1 sr t .--.1"f r;' )tlk:i.''7,t';5•_.. t 1 .s ` '�f'i A, :', r .:1 _'% r1' •,\, � ..L yy., ,=.Y+•',^^''..:.'{.4>'.�`"- .{fie. J V. <..,Tt tX t, ,% .. f s.:A ` r ` a`*'.''S�u - -- I, o r 1 r t ,5_;!/. p,i rz !1+� .• ^3' r 'rs,t q, "•`�'�°1 rcraao ,`i < ;. �;:.'=. r•�G-. Y ty`�.h.:,i✓• y�• .J',o • { z}R;,, r I is 't. }t-a •f •,,r ]:c',s t 1 y .+•�. G�• • J✓ `I • �d'- • L' ,V j • '\j �.���G •_ L Y_-, v0- ¢�{v 1 oaa da� f, � , F { ."cl x a• , , . a p4 ,va' ¢ �� y 1 :,t n , •af„s- '?'-: t . a „ } .j. i era' rr'..j"!( • � I ,y • i• - •• •'' ,,;:. 's, vitoe,-.::.', . •,:....,. If.i.i,gc • • Cr', ' %tir,�s �▪ �ia't; '.•.q s` ,'s,¢� m' c�a^•r.4. Ny a t oa l,, a. •KI\'r,,, ttir^•� ki y ` 1•,a '.e s. fir + .. ...._._�—: ; ,t+_, I•, 'IV- aX ,p' ?sS .••. ,ar {A� 4` tl1 •„ /. V.'.�• r t T ,,' , - •- _; Cl�` '� `' cef . �3,.°f1.rq• "4'n �y'se. t i �V l .i, \ - ', �� t `� n a�,,t'4`n. t�h fi .� a,%�^'a ;1 'en'. •'t� .,• - �'"`.i^, ra�r y- .�, ;• y. `Q AC!K , N. ram, V`,,h > dt. y l }. "Q4 • E • h. �� • ���.•••GGG9{J, Ems.•,*ga r;;• !., M S'10 ln• . LI' ,• -"..• t:rdp .. _ �'�� •'�; °' � " � • ,.. .ram • f•— `3 ,i is ` 1� .,. ¢ Y war ,\ 1 t..1� > .�I'f�n .p .. > ♦\, .;.r'. �_ ' < �"as ,r,r .� ��eea /ti' ? e 0 it"' t y► } ' ri,.' '^ '".''^ ,,.' y ` .11 f?! '•'YSfd�> _ rr.^'`:•P'' t"e ttE ®, a I :��. .c. '. • • C•iii� ® �'x{ .`�y } x� t. fr� +r�e�` `: �', I'l p r 1 � , ,:t.►�C illIMI 2' • . ' . Callison .. ....„- t5,r....°7' '.''' KING COUNTY NW ig_23_5:PT. OF ASSESSIGENTG y, el] CliTTAtToN 1 RETE7.7.1 .• i "Lalie.' -•- . NE V4 19-23-!../ DEPT.M0FG JCISOSUE'SITSAYI .. . , •'. .- \ '. '. !F., 11 'v L-.Jid•'1,1', ...4. I i 1.... :12.1 i Nt r • , . ... . . „ 9 ,_.n • - • 1 1,4) 4 .e.';'%. ,„..„--..,,.., • ' 1„..__ -.."...-...6` • • . : i . •..., --- ,/,ti&iiI,.. • .,. , . "_;.: .. • I, ...7',..,...•• ' ! 1 -.- ' ' `,.: . • .- - *IV' V"! 11311' f,'.7.r- 17.11,4- , . .,,,,.i..,:i2i,,.,:•„_. :,, -,, 40 .,..;:i.,...si.1..,,, _ •,. -.-?-,, 1. : la41) ,-.,;,,..,,,e.. ,. ... , se • i,, ''.. '- ' -0) %Po"6:------...,,,,- ,— • '•emer __.................... :....i.`,..-.v.......:1-74.. rir_ rill,,4 • et.,,,,,,...... 1--- ,„, „\-,-„,-- 4:- k =kit' , lu'' / "1; 1.0,,ssfe'.- ; .- -7::-r-• -:-.":::...$3.• ' \•'-`-'''''-' /'`", 10000146!'.....!-----.---- fia; , ‘1 \ ------------z_s-,-• ./ -, „otgl___,---•%;.- ; .L.. . -I,— ,•• i --. -4--,,,,"i '.." ...;•.-• , ' • _.-1.--r-T , „..__, -... , ."...-..i- ,-----=--.7.---- - • , SITE : I____ ..... ; .1!1.1 , V...,...!:;'':Ar 1 - ors -IL es . CZ i !I •,.IQ i : ,i; ,..,,, :4 ,.,.. o t--; ..--- *-2„ Lol.. 4.,:-.•„ie,7,Ar 7., ,Kt—, ..--- ., .45,— ..., .,,,,,,,_,;.,,.....:,?...00..3 -4,,N..,F.-ml hipagiraidilatiZROZZIN1E3 ‹•', ; "—'L---''''''' -'L,:r:1".%11 qe 7i. "17;.—4t.'' 4 ' 10k . "--4.' .i041119/Fjp.:ir.„-z1,11 ,-,:-.,-41,11-131ill„._ ..,..._ :'igm-01 1 1 10--bz..7.1a1,140,„,moffnittimo.=iougza4====., . 1, ,I.,-, _ ., ,... N5i1V4k,ZII°4:V-:: II rgibliii1C ltelMtpk..aill-Za74 iiii -- •-'-'-" ''• ' y •d-qL/°J--- WA;V-,arGi. Elgygt,Not -' i. -,-, - 1 ( 011e:trAo,'''..! . ! !.. '!..!:.$-."-;'-•'''.,.., 4 L,MV,L4W-...ags _ „ --i ilit ‘ •',. 0, ':?-1 °•°"';'.." '-elgit r'7..:',11EPORC,ull:li'ilFAM114111011 Qii ' '. -11.- P.** ' '''q-q li I ° 1p 71,',-'Whiszcz ';'•,---ozomiotti,:''7.1 umniogrow-Ipcg. , --1,-. .---, : -,:____.— <=1,-p: V-!-:.[-------r P'•--Vs2==iittiAL:Es' ".7.-:'.-."tile' ai •••-•.p••••.••• •771t"---"'.i'..- --- ..;;IF'-'1.59t•-.7---1-7 - • t•-''T 1. •fs-1-,•-ai• 'iii.4 ___,...„ENIAMIN 111 ."'- l''±.•^1:ti.e--;,5'''''-'.,•:',-;,.-'i ''.Nt-, r:' .,.71-i4.1414'4;-,i,,;' --- '''''. ,t4/6 CO 1 '''''-:;,;:i kt ... _....:e ___,.. .....,...;;.,..,,,,,,.:„ :...\.„.,,_.,3_ ,.. r. „:: ,.........„ moilPma L • . ,...: •_. 1...ea ma' fft,.•711111krgima ;,..,.......iiNE:i Mirli, ....-- -- Moms ,.,'I• ••• ',,,--.,:•„‹....,,,,,.. ,....- ^c_....;;e6ii_ ''''-'; SOME W....,.;;<-,..." ,,NPP, .:,..::i•,/KIM =marl rob --a 7[1 ,•., kM,...-.,--,,,,,,,,-: '2: - EmmidEMMaa ... -:,---,0,,,,'/' 10,-,CIL ;:f.4-....1 2::M12 -1:11•12'Z Wm,1 ,::::-.., l„ r 1,t\ikkk ,. t! Emaguaszmn Aiwa] :-.:-•::,•,,,,..,..,..A ,,, , .,h.",,.1 f xivii:MT.Z.imiliElmilMIii,,mmizer.11:1 . , v .,,•,..k.: •;.•. _...-_, ,,w;_ .... ,,..t.. IMMIX TEM= , .„.l i 4........ .... 52mga.,:i:. MIng,•,/,-: :.,4 an ,,:.,..J.;' ,1131 EN 7 m.: ill::: ; %-,'•/ ,. • ,i P''''' "-k.,•,g.FL7 r-5-i:', '' -.-- -, VICINITY PLAN VIA E PLACE N. ''-k ACiitiEKIT.#6\a,\, .:, ..,.- .. ,-... - 4-. Aft ':- . __ ___ 1 ._ , ,,, .... • . .. I .„..._ 4 ..--- . . ,-----'f Nkfruut: , ,- VILLAGE PLACE [ , , ,...... ...-- --- \• 4 i . NORTH u wirig- : HMO PAN<AND KIC6 . . . • ' I --;-_--,.....--,-'---. . , \ I . I • ,i,./•::-------- - ---:1_ -- ::ll.:_17„ -11:Vi::4.2 i.r ,-.- . .., \..1.,. :---— ,, C\s_rs,_ 17-4-_:"1:;-‘_E11 '11:1;1.') SI i RENTON,WASHINGTON f .. RENTON VILLAGE ASSOCIATES / .70ND 1..111.01615111 / k _- - 4-- ,--- - - LgOtslb (Alison . - --:-.- ropy wAy .. ,;.:-.".‘,1 4 •______ _---:- --- --'-- ' „ , , i \ -:-- --- ---- ; ---.- i RA14,, Kiwfog . •:- - . , , ' cgui toklu ,: , -7—-7;7—.......,, OA -OW 0./Fe karnilal /''' \ ' . „. i --0-----, i‘ :*-, 0' \ -":-:::- ''1' $ 1 ' Incirivo,y — ; .,.., ODf fagatox 11,".* - (---_------, , , Nu- ROW Wog.R.6441.41 ---. i st. ---,. . ! ', MIIIIIIIIII OW etw - ' S'‘) ' l':, 13'-ii:1 \ H''',, -17;'' Y''' : '? I ' , ......_ , . , , __.. A X I \fl \ —14— —.11 i I M 0 rir — 1 —: . MO _--:, , • ,-- I ', 4 , `, , — ,.,+I / i . , ..f;.. . 2,,, •„,,., .. (._ ., _ .__ ,, _ ,„,,, ,,-, ...- ct5.1 , 8L \, i\ ,' - '.. . , I' ,gli , elg FM S5.6 fle . , . . fAY'N I , , \...0 CI DO • 1 • • ' - --•) 1 1111 .,\ ‘ , 1 . . •'.\, y. -,* - ... t : , : ,, x• ')..A.A.,‘,)<"--.‘ i , .„. • ' . ol . ,, '''''. . . , , •,4„//./.., ,, , , 1 . L6 .-... ' . Nr'‘,\\\\\\\\\\\ ) _ -- , / • la .,„/ ,L . r m .J -1 - -i 1 --I----- ----7 -- -0, `. 1 _- s, ,,,, •; , ..... ., . . ... ., .. . ,„ . ,..P......... . ' irsrts-r 1. - - -.„.• I \ .MA 1,,,I Er47. '-'. -6:1 \% \N ,•',' " ' Apr* , 0 • „ • j 27 S 9 • , - - ''''i IL, .1fir-- M ----:---!'-ir ''''' • ''. , ',.m ••••••••••.•1 .--- --,J ;..., V.t.---•=....17.--.-... . ',4,„,_ .. • 1(--\\.• , ____, .____ , ,„ I--I••--s-- - - It -4.-- ... ..- -- -"--.-.,:aii _r_"_',----. ' j---- ' 4 ,, i '• 12..) ..4.....---........._- a.a.u...4m..... -- -_-_-• - . . . N -a------ - -- -- :., J.s. \ ,., , •VIMI•rrISIMME ., ... c- ' ,;2-\...... i i • •-.— - .. ' 1-1 , " GRADING -IC1 I• (L . _ _' • • ----- -- ---- ) il "! ' (-'1_ [___ I PLAN -- --- --I ) --, •.,,., , ___.; _ _ ... ,-- - •, / _., 60610A4 • ,--•\ .- • Ic.J.Z. . . ...„‘ -1 ; I .' •MIT.. \ 1fl '-.N.\ Og•INIKAti 014,MAri '''‘. '' ...'• c_lr- ATTACHMENT#23 I—...-- ...................-...- .\ m /` /— VILLAGE t / PLACE U k'_ _ - - �� � NORTH 0 No il4' 14M0 PAN:AND KICb �'� � y KHO r•uoCI I 4AK�AVM.�,. ,, '` \ •/ T / •�_i RENTON,WASHIl GTON 1 - RENTON VILLAGE ASSOCIATES I :� ,. os OUND M If61615N1 C/ �1�� 1' I r I p r csaapN OF nw Can son 8RA JA i'' NN 4P 4M �° ARM 6D 1 / \ �� S" I a•c n� r Sr,HUN y urn 10 - erv6W M6NfnN e.... _ a"" ;r ,L \\\l\\\\ L I �l b1N • *Away sewn. ? Ir p "$ �� I ------ f/D . mfl(aokWDo 5NNnVm/WWI.w LwUGla arrori b � . I o $ ' " II 1 '— a ✓ono o a sow NNGK Iii." ' .�( J /a ' I` NNPAy i1 , --- osmay vela• um sne; ' I ; _ L- I, I PIWN .m..un,/ I - roaoxDwEaun ,- I � I Mfr.W.1iGWUu610 PfhWN i 6\ , \\ —:, ^.", IPNu'LDWhELUu6 EK6NCN( ��I,(�� i ----_ �I • ,\ i I \\\1 1\\\\\ D j i I ❑ -_--' agnfluh WV VwN6 OM>7� % ..`' f _111___J� � I I I I eOA MPG PerAPNENf mVNzr4Gtl ' i / �n N\\\\\\\\\ � r� l—' i Co 6 • I U I l eM /aifNNUR¢Vh4f r % I , nM WIPZND�R,5n6•w¢5W •/ I' � I _ I WI SIG•u,.it ' 11 I I aH19 P.O.MwIry01N,( 11 / ' 'I �r -L' - i fPOWLD POE WONT R, • t1, ` _ _' _ -- _ I�,i rJ TAn myI A. MAWR EAR awe ////--"" Arcs•1•4465N6 fAY'N�V6 _— \\\ 1 , W,,, ,.., /' / l///S//// L 6 I. -- i✓!' `..O we POO taMoN • �� % • 10'�:.2.--a.• , l '1'\\\\1\\\\\\\\\\ , Na\\\\\\\\\\ L ,I `.\ 1 s f l a. ;�wT j Idlisl I I I'i'I I I I/° ' ��Pa r4-l - I __ / J\ •\/\\ • IN�iI MA foP-lab • \ \ u.., ai t-4 wry,w-y,,r lea•w.a 1 \ ?' "Y �\ ur -_4,\ J 'j I r.o .�7� ` 1__ `- i'O 1 \\\ • i`----, uM+Ni acMnur.a uwPe u.e C//////////// .. ''I i r- W N•mN�u� 1 iI N % ..� .._ _ - - --� f- -- .. _ - ! ne•vw �I `.\ r al '1-` Ili' \J .J 1 h .Dann° •Ip' �. '" ,-'I• - - WATER, \ •n i iv <I_ is �� _ N i -,I I e SANITARY& l j ' I - - - - - - - ,__-_______-_I .\.__.,_______.� ! `-�-- STREET LIGHTING _\ 'I. ''- I mac.- i—Li \ PLAN J�1 � • - j ON6 RbFNON NFCb i ,0_37 rz/Nw ?P_e �\ J1 i �G6N61 P GNE,MA I '\ ATTACHMENT#24 s; . �kfillr:� a\ I `<' VILLAGE Fv6 I > ,,�, rJ PLACE L NM MO PARK AND KIW l -=-- -- { T 4• NORTH 0 1 //' ��i'tt�`"- — =/ y _i RENTON�WASFONGTON LYVY/AVE•h• �� ' ' ki RFNfGN VILLAGE ASSOCIATES n r- AND Nlf/ot* e 1 .— `-i I- , `' �y- 1 � Callison i anyY I< f . GPO*Cu. 1 WA S v 'Il Q Easmw 59Z4rallrow ;fl o _— d MIMING SmRN Mt/SWAM _%. __-- j c c t /1,i . I MAWSCi•vAoeduwauen ,, I PR 7WOJ/D " • �'�'� I _ " ""/ - _ -' ^ \�, 1 ---- I �- IWeo56P`RPM rW6 ^-V µi,__ ti-. � '`---f , i �1�i" -� • , - i b • Nwo.�aDPi+w�uuole ,�..... ` I / rJ L, . S•w°. _P`„ • d I a PIiPGrou OP MOW 4,1 ,•• o..,,»„ Y ,•, -- - j '^ '®/ `, f \�fI �I RL• FpOyO�fI WIA�yGA4AWfiNZ WN1 •mnuun, 'I I�i - - - ,'r I I //\\\\\\/dill:`l F Ix e I 1' {pp,'M ccar6lKfldr I I ` QI.• 16 KCN tP6,4kl:Ck PP \\(\TI 1� / • .-� II /.� PII ,,__-' .-mow i �. - ''r_J .3 ¢, \\\\\\\\\\ il c ��_u / I �rLG 9ww RsBunoN OM - y r al Q 0. .__,__, . , ,.: le /ii. ,,.. ' Qr° ' y 4, 3 1 I \� CT.:, 1 r- c- '--- ..,,.., ? i- n n n ----- ----- L� J J w) I• - \\\\\\\\\\\��br lcb•�s%' —— I 'PAY I` i y f•A O'- ❑❑ v N .�\\\\\\\\1 S yr i%1,- /ey 1�, , , : ' '-, I 1 /,' 1. I :,:. V i - �- _: , I `1 16�s G woo, - 1, i iM 961VIj1l I1 yp.Qu9 WW IK WaN[8D —- - _ . k-.. -)1 , ,A I --ir . ., N y . `?; " casQ w n u wxa.umuw mE We -_Uv, 3 • /J/�//I��� vveaIEQ zNO. 51xVN WkfpzWw e6 FL-I*80 �% B'3_-"„�- 1 -0`. y i, _ � , `.-' I *IV AwrON,,Th MHN1FiRMQce f0i N5 WNC-r.G't1EaJf.ea-510PM al 6 ....ow. i ON, /. N X• i + i 1 -----(I --_" o-.�.. 5, •' - air ,�. ' \\\\\\\\\\ - - ---'Z r 1; �N� !j 49� 77777777777— — .. 1—:—.;?. \_ 144N-‘1 1---="( _11 1=71 l o__-`•�_�' -- -h . ' % —,\ '.\-1 •. .,,, 1,.. . f I Li 4/ ',. t • r— / 1 1 �/f . ...„„ ,..— STORM • l ijN- '1:1LV- r _--t ---',' ' , / I DRAINAG E �`--.�=---b---.� \--'e- --- 1 \, L_7 -1_.�1 - PLAN i a 4 ; ^ \ emu ' r 19.26. , y ; 1 ON6,cb�FfoN NA[b ,. G6N6RA(,UN6MA \ I ' , , ATTACHMENT#25 • • CD N Vk 2 W I 0 I- Q O .''-'. ' 2q 1R1py ti 0 k , .., ,,. , 411 ,..k,, ollt 1 Aii , ...: , ,.: i.. 1 4,4 4 ,4 I i• 0. z :. -...., litt, 17 I- fo, .•f11- 2.1-k•N:.i'i,.1 , r s �''•t;gl l�lltctL.90.1\tw"i-:,.e-Gd1±L ; ' II '.:• 1 ' • vN ��\„ � i;'I i.• e ° y t`h a °� t y t 4� 04 g 6Js `•z• ; h4 II fib° '� e �aiPi I .y i i `' 4 , i. • .\r;:;A ,,,/ }�1Y 1 �. . �� I'• 3 EPfi l �Vh '‘. ' . , A; 4.6. !I lild Fv \1• `\ �o1l�p k t •..A\\C''i'',.,'':•,.!,";„.'i': • I 1'�'',:'.I(1` 4 t, ., ,, t{a `,1 4'�-:,•: - U ! 1:d1!i 6;N9*., _ l!IB . w Ilia .;t 010 \ ‘ ... .,': .A e II A 1._e_ iil! p . it' u 4k4. ',:1110-b' - : 1" N1‘1' q i'\ t 1 t' kzt .a�`,. }j ( •1 > "- // S ••S 6-Zh eqt IMy ` • yyFp1,`�t ;2\ 1, .F h �/�/�s� �� �' °1 A 1° a `E ti ° In \ 1 A. etIb' tl` li , _ ' �S 1�yV yy�� 20--1-1 0 • P, �-lt ;Ey V \ 1 '�i '.� k.e.. .x v' a �°°,°�. aiii?2�.4'�T° �e�d � � �� —��°\ ,`�' �i` �•4 � t k r nn! 1 'v ��„ , 4�1� V 'a k ., v \\x�;; `4 2 J _ .�` ke'I; a •• 4 5',, 1R . Iry _ '`"�4; i ~' Y U ' tin` \1 kCi '' n Rgly ° t tis; mV 1V. ` � A r/ ,iii I NI. • l'i4 S 1441161 _pi ,/ • n ~ 1 '� }`^ , °!#4 ;k1h-iZ- .Z.. I1;j F/V ^\ ..--- — ,... . . I y-III" • It ,.,. ., 't the ,° s— •.,, 1 1-7 6' ff �k S !/ ,1 n [Yk, (e•—n---_ ,—nw1 i CI.,y ` p g d :� ��" e I Y q,a t yt fz i cT ,'� °�. ,��j', °' 1 . VA ! t� VE \ �:'1 i t ��' �v� ,` I .. ��_••r , 1 311 �1'i •�• g q�� $ I: i i A i1 ���1 V1� to olio ;1. h\tl�k i�I ° . v ie—=—_ -�v ��.t 'S\ ��PyV 0 l i 2 tr, �_ • t� e• • • _ �•' sue m�. V F� (1 �� `FIto n• 10th I. re ,� _. "i �, i, i Vt`� - �'r:;s a V ° \" z �, N v k I z' 4 r ,G.-.r s-- ti `` 0}rh i� Vn V p /- A �, i Nit °� E, • ,y .4, nRd q ` 1 0'40 1. �� k` - �1'� �! .\ 7. . 1 y .0, k0 Q �' t. , v1 t°!t �1v V>V i `;'�.�' e:y, °` p •V Ah ti N �y N- • 1 !l''� ' l•• V \�f bV\V)( azo$111ldd\it , , ' ..� --"-- --"d\-- — *`�iZ ; 4 , -dt FI` `l "yFe V v -vac, V t 1 4 E t'J .. _ -€— �=- _ -— to _ -• v o .:- - kt� Rn cur R° �U i• t�k ". yid " ��M _ __ TT- �` v . r .b: : `�kVyG24 .,VV° 2 " }�. .�, et 4p, A\„m" l'i1^'\ c 7;:t7,-.4'7,:-.,_21*,,, ✓ -�j R • Ir ° 9 °'4,'••. • . •N 1 ': : p y _\ "` _` \ / i. 4i ,,\/+.0'', tip, . li? eta, e •. . \,..— - •'yv: 1 a J • � 1. N/ 7;\H \t6 l' 9 ° %'+y V nii‘ 5°1�i Y <'2 t t ,Q y i F �u "v i �,l\H P �p.. „ i ! h 4`n°° �, `tl_ 1 `, .`:� ° I •}l.p, �° ' t .h �i1 '�� ° '• � � a g ° 1 P "e e iy� ! 1� P q a� ve ; ..i: aye I ev'.�.. �, 1 " E a � 1 V \ipF !t ' \1'0 ' ,tteR 1 `' / ; ° �I 1 n "R i 5i k Z p a A 2 p ,,, i Et ps' I,$ a k k k 3 t t! k V k 0,1 b 'e, • '? ",w ,,,lit i ., +.,9. �1 "0 7 C d ` !t A 01I �� oar _ k, 1 N'1'01'1 1 " 1 :lH � v �i � °4�t €e�3 ° °k Al pi"� °k eik n s' \,4.li \\ / a 0 °`V� i c,k nti,,i, ,AM'A l ..!!1 i v I1,ittlni�le0e r • • . ..--- .. -- — VILLAGE .. 6okfruu: . -- i \ r-• 4 . A . '' ,1 410 .4...e,.. ., :.:....”.. PLACE ......... Or ,...._l_,, .,....:,,ir',.,5_ "4, '.eV NORTH ...":"•.-ALLLO•4,::. -. ...a/F..7.1:.."`" 1.-•%"::•::L."-- . Norill' lino rAt(1(AND 1(% ,tj 8 •'•)—.,--, 7.- :.:,.:=...'.:7••• , . k,V Ar,r,41'4'' '' '?:'....), 4 • —''''',,, RENTON VILLAGE ASSOCIATES 4111.!...•• •-''''''' n \ A''7 IL' ....,..""...r.-i• •A.LA 11. IAI, MO.12. o ::,---- \.s. -- .-4,521.---......... • ::,...,<6,f or'-• & e\s%\\\\\C) • ".)- ,,• -„.1t.----- r.-:-:"::::::- Callison TAD MItio.IP1.5111 . t - emu vIrd.E,,c,...... ••.•••••• aKtkvy may . ...-ofa ,. -it'il ....- ,..•rf A.Pleo 41417,;..42F" ' OA Z"F.T' •,''' •414 6GIOSK\fh . / • , E4.1•12.41.1.1..P•JMI ,;-q. .:" , 14 11.,.14..,,i,_,,s ;Orli I -...-..0 ----- t•-..-..,';'.14",...., -.1•°"-;10.0.-,-----..----....o.N.--!,-fl ,/,' - . -z.22 maa . . ,,,,-...gt-42iie;;;100 '".0.4..,',V0 -,m-----., 1BRIfTWAy • ..,..gir-r-. ..... .,,,,,,, yr:-...:.:-.1-4.. 1.-2:71.-- :.41°--- _. - )1 ill orirmpi ,lelf.,-. c/--40-- .........--..— ' 0 1 / iA / ,114 min------ ::::...N.,:41:::, •,..„......,— ,. '111111F. -- 17,:••:::::.:.:::::" /•••.•:\t, ',:4if:,„•AvIril , w 0 ,,, „ ,; ,..) Ai t 1.,,, _A 41 te,•,',,- ;.7.,./40,,Ip; - - - 3 , c•Lo-46.1T P.M 140.1.1 —0- r, ""'''r''''''''".• -- kb.-AvA I , OF& \ v011 — Y.7.10. or ... , OW • (0) tr.""...,,.:1'.4'' Vs 6.--.1 ••••• , Y. 111,417P2,1,...— ititg .44Ai 1 i ti( (kklelki , ---- -,--.VILLAGE PLACE NORTH 1,3 ...La.... •Av. ....eg.yrs, :,.......,111!......-.4.5 0. • \ Yrr, ,4,0 r...:1: :°6771:r".' 1 ' -- W.I. cS..':, S • ,. .., aaiiirx-!,r - o , tvivfo, 0 ' kll ritEtc:°- EFIL7f4"-- P RKING GARA E 1 • •"11'1' ' Igitr5 27,a'''''' .c1 .,....611....,11,••1! ‘,..• ,' .1 .. • •4.1.-1....."17e,24;d1 , -- --- ,,...,,,t,,.._ 7/ --ii..LNILIT ..— --1 . Nam*. ..":-:, ' s 11,1,0‘ Or), IV2) ' 10 i I j , _—•'c -----1-' I Wit N 6,,q,, -. r e ..............^. , f'L` /A,;.‘• .....,....... - ......i.. - vIN *;„,,*, •, _, L (_..z.::•x -Nk,,:l.._;4/ (---) - 0-::-1 Am Am Aini Aleik AIL%,..9 1 1/4VNIFItii7VIVWW4) L I---- --ti 11 , /64.',6 , , I , 3 ).."' • F.1:2;:1...-.1"7.1:.'Ll7::::.171.71:11.:7..77..1'1V itt:N 4.„.'. (•''''-7_ J 1 ,, .. ' ,a L./.,... 511•If •/PA t41{,50•INAct•O'T. ,:j.•1'. 'r...:.?: • ex l•aDuPPP.- ,tr,^ e \"::‘, le i Io [ . :•*iiitiLY:22:j..g:IRT.elf:T.Effi:;":7 ......outts ,,, ...........................................••••,...- .......•••••.....•i7::•..17:::..1.....• •.-t,B Pr.., w " :7.:1:-LV:.•:;:nrZ,":::77.Z:"'...."."'“""'...". L ,_,..07:•LL•Ls (e,T,..co., odoNAI'cl. •-'. .\\V.,41.; --1: ..:„..... i__,\ ,. ' //. \-: (AK.'1 1-- *IN \ .‘% •••::'''xiii-37...r ,•:...`-t.',:-:`,...,:y5,71.3:4. -.Zp11,....r-....: .. 4, 'NeoratV' r,"%lt.rgAali.=,4,,, =Wz122„,i,....amfil %.•.:4,_ ,b,,, -..-- (1) 3N.;1-ri,IVi iipittiafa&-2 1. __.j '''/-•9 :I. _1._,,,/ --a A. vu,. •-... Ft,4,-.AT -P5rIt=7.t.VItg:11:Mt 741:•41NVI7Lor'.." '7:t% '-'14.44.`‘?.4'41' ., Z.T.r-ceo....,T.FerANO mi..LA 5re.L.T 11.te, siTE•t.• ..••=a...LP I:1,4f.PL.Lo0.0 •4,.4.4 owv....rg'" ) .,•Ati.il,(WOW • ;,,,a)tD ;411.1.',1r...4. ..41N.4111147/...PW/FOR.P.Ffil. .NO ,- ) r.;.;II;leit..;,• ;•,...../....i•.•-...1,%.•_4.!...I. •.....,.. •. 4' '''''•..'4',....g'74e‘41.1" • LANDSCAPING ... ,. SITE PLAN ,. %.r.,••ever.t.o c 4.10•••Ii•I 5.1 I. .N.F.1.n.•..r.4 S/01 . . '''''''E•Vigrljr,VIWV, .9V0 3Z 04- 1V-91 6061KGIN 1 tio lc,c,voK 1;14kcr,9 I — .. ....... \ V:INEICAI)oNpv,r11 . ATTACHMENT#27 L-1 Icm.-.......... ............__ • �ro VILLAGE _e PLACE °; f 71 r- NORTH "nnN 9 ®, RENTON,WASHINGTON xrru _I \ -wc s a.e• ® RENEGE VILLAGE ASSOCIATES ® PL ANTING ANTING DETAIL(UP,CE) ®THEE PPLANTING DETAIL DEei,Je (Me...) Callison ax^'•'� y/ ^/a,sr e..re In.• M 4>q ynNNRarAegOXSlaaaD ed.� II s'' ..V0414 uor4:Py51+.1f. PLANT SPACING DETAIL CTu\ yL C TAIL( SHRUB moans arms. a"L I ® Tfls la au. L=PY cvsT_' cam— • v. ilrFF _ °lc.l ` \e _ cPNP.J0,14- - J O. ,p p.EvnTieA .vumn r..a i . ! L 1 �ruih�TTP� eviEl•.P A ieF /� AR+Mu lAu3 _ - tT' nfn eo iur+,P IC. , u4[[f ,•✓ 4�+o iik - G . e r{, • e_ , 10. • _ _ [Ma•sirmal [I)nI \ Y C- air ., If .. L T PLAZA SECTION &Manx 'I5`,I-u' ©PLANTING ISLAND SECTION {i� � s.ue asis+ - 1 i -- h ' village Place North \ _ CPF,7 JM✓r-j I .••••e rva ' 'aria!V v euw xr. HeRwsE x=wn..nm.r kT. _W ,'. I.,'',''''/ u AFV Ll PR` y� "tLEE„ C- H,%;Ic5 rpcNurt .- "YES" eren F E. ego"1ea,:AT •PLANTING SECTION AT STREET R.O.W.• ��qq.WW yNp�p lyi' j(Il ■%//,1.�. � � %//.�Ie AENAE E ESS '- - --1,soP N...sI i_ ": I 5c0 LEI�gll Y IpYDII�11��.�si ��ll �L�I �� T ,!fN �•" •�,.0 HDl 11 ■ EVF1./YIoWEMNlr • ti<ft y,I4 1rIiiY� H �i1 5 RV9 4HN ie i.ErTA IEANIRE EA j5 VAWNDO .7{�III •�ilia I-II 1�`II y*U�AU, Illiti ,\ A S„,..a---...,„:,,„ cr!f uP,,K .' F, A.,N r'er41.5 rpm! 14�t"'1,,IIJI�,r"]'Fli t E .4 'I +`". �e''•`'�-,/+.}l Z a....-V I.nlnnLL-Ilrue, i.:f,' . •II"fry �_ �..-�I.� ^,{Tlia.r/,la sERvi[E^ {%I{eDEYLo[vs'Ir2E ep�nm I. �' ��Ii��r ♦.`•S[- AREA J. �+ Ile,.-+hues )N'-!" f 1�'},r��j �/. gRT^ �,I'nn•; roPP+/,n� •. I :211 i,.'r416204 p�ll'9 1�p illig h^Ill •.•„• •snmu IATfiP-mere.". n,n 1+`1x' rvrtnnV 4reA -rnnrt '`'S11u.".I►�. aE r14�� Li�i,.�..:��e4u'11111�11iLLP II 11M��� LANDSCAPING >m^^J.,u", ^, IV DETAILS /� �r�l (ee".i1 nLa.'(sis"Mal..nry iur115Y- ✓Z M1'IR.A r x I_ _4-TofTDr i" Cara AJSIPI N Acf 1�/UP_ NAL n. V I \\\ I'e`n(, (M fa .`� atocAs Xa4oSA 'LAVfIAC ESOP f VEAEneven S N MIL la.. t rors.-,rrao+.4i.�,L 1l® so.,I,NA ✓r cnl� w.r +.�l'fv hYl.,<ioil> 1." 4.n' fu,: •.wr.•Ai. ..:7 ur. Stu, ilea MD PEHM'h q',7 . t" .. ( I:.f" /\ rro r„au faERFrFE. ;Ti seNrC I VENN �a�rt...�,e Jlry,e.�{. . s s T y -`eV Mrne NeO D•TstlEEi 37-'37 /2./UNE 90 I BUILDING PLAZA PLAN r+AZ a rn-.I n°"""° , �'II to ,.-. ^.ro.w" mow •� ,tF- - - — — r'c�e"rnuc,�.u�c maf r,.o ...n.e. •`fit ® ',ate then I.o' Eire EPce. ® ROOF PLANTING DETAIL .Q TYPICAL PLANTING SECTION II.-,PLE. ATTACHMENT#28 L-2 • • hlikfr v •`K , _ , VTT.LAGS ' PLACE Fin NORTH gtl Hew nRc aNDC6 1 - E _ . , I� 7 i,--/S/N u/NH✓ `y/25_ 1L-,Ill - I N� y• _-' - '--- RENTGN,WASHINGT ONp RENIUN VLLIAGfiAS50CNIFS i Jlmay// s Ny0 AV0"LJ• II \K � < - 4 \I— -I/ .� ey u \���1�\`�\\� / L Irr +:" - r / I 1 � IC p -•n a 4r.r-r.hOND 4bI6 i '= acavy wy ON%! __ ��� I r • 'vrI it l \\i k , ''i ' I \l I I ` 6iNUNSKy�! f NfoPl ��. --^ �_� Ir =-T,,,' :•P'!Erf1yR/HNe+Nk 5/UN ��� - -- < �!9.F� ' OO .' EPA, �. S ' ' �,,.`.'• -r.I-• ., l///////♦ • �11NP(WQ Y :— t ., Mo t : i' - µ ; 8 i,✓PoTEE no E c oEven q.45 L A cN .e...n.,a. [ j • * • `t` ¢ �`' F' P`.I1A G.eEn*aE EX 7r/y /o e.y'/ ' I / m ` . • "I,I aO � ' , �, `' OFD PnVNb G� 3t ,,,„„ 1..t•"", FX.16V5�4t'e 6. E E/S74 /-SGRI . . $ `,g• # # —a � \6�' i ; , o C/3 ` • ffi I 9 \� �� 4 - atVrat / `l I' O -* ;", ` _ 2 F I O . ' Y CRdF7E.0/Nb4.LSEEGOA90EYOE'YN3VEE, / a I. A •-_ I- "�, �w \s 11�4 NB#.•.,Vq ��` b 2. f/ES Gtv/L LFNbS/-9iE"R'9N5 t 1 y.. �,/ �j/ aEv/nL PFh,y.esw/ 2W/77,Y4 . a ', .�,! /Vekomvs. ,. a e p c.:NoincNS �-o,e.r-.n¢nfE�e i �I bi " ., , ,�P t 1 - �/ < Add' •; 11c' , 27' /ii�kFd6_ "T/ /NFia wA;4,. jl i 'I -' $•':„ -' l,' k e # 9.DN 17H5 p /NCB E2/5r4 S//Ek/e,e, \ - _ ! /3 SH6wN WNH IASHEb 4NE. aid 14 '14 ' ---: ,7---'�a ... €)N ..° n�G NEW �/f�woe/t/e sHo.✓N int \tw # IG„ Nf w"'7/E 1 4: oi> /N N01M7cN: \/ ) 'F+,�� � F ! ---- - - ❑ C YLLL• 2/� / /4 h ® ~ FG/LE POSIUM 4oN N L'YL�/ED. -- I~. I� .� `7 ',•w 5:w oRXiN4 .�'nee/rrEV75, — ' e..,,.Lkl f��es� .�jOa .'� GV! So4445 /�1.: 'Y'^' !�':. �� ZaI.�6 ALf 1s.2 lA4S ` ' .,/ '',Y :+SR}"l o 3- 4. 'V s .F4Lq.= /cP 5P. I/ 3 $� w`-# \\\\\\\\\\'\" V 6./:6 rA/L PA2X N k # phice gsr 4Ro55...9P= -- L/ y r..,,� �i; a V'"., vf{.LS ./r- �9 I 65 I 186�8 !. 1t,-/T16NtT LE.WSFE --- l L, ,'g'•;Fti.•a —) j ✓#945,= /cm Sv -- `� ▪ ,• �, ' ::a ✓sit 1, J I, /� /^ —` ST'4+c BE' SEE SH(,q4:5 iaz PA.aY.lN4 G7e asD — M6.E7,. • Yy,W - f _,24' , /(J G. N4NONAPPEb AC[95s/6/r�]j� •OLSoN U1EPG/L ° t t i I� y• �t € iiKNs( 27.X 466. 9 I.gennL. . m. ,raaPr �'' REmM,x A5!5^ 16' �/„+V/RSNEsl15 NET: iOI \�� L_� \ r �sEEuNo 6 ,. �p-S,�N: bor�rn�w" .�.e / I ^\ ` ..-t<. a-Xt£PX3,>7Hn4V T / < It r 1 _--1 L \ J µ •....f`II �E'E'CgNOygsE PUYt. I 12 \\ \ r• r snP 5. R> NT J VILLA 7LA \ n - SITE PLAN i I 1 Ll 11 / i:L- - \ lam_ 1 1 .,- ' --— - - "/ ��, --__________I. ' I S�7F PLAN L r �to OW R I —� � F--1 I • 1 1 89039..s ./3b-`II }�.[Y`�`. r—_— I ONE WON N.flCb '-- - ;� ATTACHMENT#7 VILLAGE PLACE NORTH RKcaa/N me ii- -_ - _-'� ' jai.; I II WASIDNoTal Imo_ ^r ..1.-_.. I r ILJU I _._ 1�� I III. n VDI Arx=mu g .- - . - ---- Jj ,I „:I:I I :11h lI n❑ I I ,1 RE — �■I I p.-o 5r cave. I i•■iiI 9EJ-- IC JI —_ ' _ococD❑❑d CI_.1Q -_-— -__- • --_- - I I I I I I�I■®��1—l ��ilial I I,,._, I wnlSDa �L ILilC IICC]Lpp[]1 Ft'-h - - I! LIT1 'i_i 1=I=I [ I-' =- I rilI������ ��I�I I I • I FiNSN. memman10❑❑C- _IL II II . —__IL_ 7❑❑❑❑❑p1=1000❑ --I I I'f�l I iit 1 1=f�1e1• - , I _—i 11.1 !I .. =I I I I - �� 1 1 ■■■rili�lUklF ll 111� -] JLJL JI 1JEJuoom0❑ a9NDPy Pxr I I l T/e.ss riEsrrt eui I�li����lM® N� IM1 ten. �� �� W _ ... , i••�i®®®®[7[1❑aIJLIL— !I • 1L ,I--IC --__I!_�J ioo❑ n EI.:I Mg _W_ ;Tr: tlfliallifitiTil 17 IR -' -UMW REIEr _ - �® uui sikEtmu��e. ..Inmll REtraRRnvE CntumN _ 7YPaaL smrE,eavr EAST ELEVATION eeonn.' "•P 6, eon, NORTH ELEVATION IszoasE,SEENDIE O1fF(6 6/>w RtTM,rl to R£-6t/L S7.FJP. I , I 1 -- - II Ia.J� _:� —�'�Iml_ �■aoa■aaao�aeeew=sc` -- II I I I-LI-II "' . e1r1:l ;141�IriiioIQ1ra�h:hl am: I r�ri II -- I I - - - -' milgl; I I I I -- I I 1 �l :I-I == 1 I ■lml■ImIr hI■1■I■■I■I-�E=".-�";':`= - • - I I I I I I I I mkt__ --_— __. 'ilih®I�la it■)■i�dlml■I�I cI -a-� ---.�. - _ - I I Mil III — I - I I I1 I I I I.I= - - -ii.t III IuI ■I�110 4 o iiil■ II■—i.I■I■Ia dt= •. . -- _ . I I I I I I II - _ ( j,�tRSr�c I___ I - .•.4=11:11 I■114W J JI■I■■I■I■I■I�I■ --- ;- - I I III I I 1 I '9W*1- .^� I I I .d -- AI I I L� i ,� I 1 I -II � - - _-,■I:I:l.IiI.■I■1$1( "P,T.. g i 1■1■.I■1:1■Is■�®W --:. :-_. : - I I I I I ICI�1 I III .,- I www wad I I. I .==— ;lal■ill i owl •D��,� ONO■Iil■I� ��=■I _---.V. =l I I-I L I I I II ,,.w ,,, - I I I I I I •�I - I I /�PRElA/N me -I I n_--'"' '--=1-1=141■I=MIMIC -ri III!■ —.— flame 0=i= _-4"I I I I I .III I I 11 J 2=D•b t No fON4COL• /KE-IAST re WEST ELEVATION SOUTH ELEVATION sNam9 liN. NOTES aV eaLo,e ELEVATIONS Ca44RE7E• To E. .494VJEa 14c.,b^ 1-/4/1r cy Y ee'4e- CylA5$ lb BE f.E SLf4,r77-y .(e .Ern btu -4 Y1J. P&'A i'-4ii'111E-V 7£1.BE 69RF�R. erw. Sie 0.¢E£ Lot.¢ ov et-t- 4.®V(ae- )Z -Q. �VPRAPR/ATE 69a3ZOP- S-6-ya .4 ZiiTJ, Mna .... ATTACHMENT#10 A4 253'b' VILLAGE T-B IS'-V 30.-0. 30.-0' 30.-0. 20'-0. 2V-0. 3V-0. 3V-0. 3V-0' 15'-0. T-S' PLACE 4 _ � i I i i I I i •! •! i NORTH f ■ • . ■ • ■ • • ■ ■ RENTON,WASHINGTON RENTON VILLAGE ASSOCIATES IA r Cason 'rk---Fr W jol-g- igr.P.-7_._-.-..L_.•41.I ' . ; it, • Lik IN°, :Elio 1E:1 E i ,al M b 0 .__._L . . . . . . . ■ •— • TYPICAL FLOOR PLAN # I I ♦ PASSENGER DROP OFF j T` ','''"''1,, ■ II IpIIi�Hhiiiii IuIIIuuIIIuuIIHHIIIIIIIr _ ma • ■■■u•um l:301i■i3i■ii3■iii'3ii ---�.wI■ i■■r 1 ■■■i■■■■■■■■■■ i■■■■1 1 )11.B■ M4 _■ I■■■■NI r■-----1■ •-��I . -`\E■I•. e- .■■ ■ M■a■r 1 'V_ gill -- ■ ■■■■�� .I 1 I -- • POTENTIAL RESTAURANT 1 OFFICE �tl ,I�■ ■ ■■,.•.IIII`.�\ (+.wAvf iwaeo.c � i J L_�J 1 — ■■■■■■■:re LIB Nommazwip. wilt . _ , • • • ■ • — ■• ■■►1��1 *aim®I I® 1 -E. 1„ -- • I■iii l I Y h ' 1■1• o Y/“�yL •A ____J 76.z.,,, / ii 111 El , ‘...,... III far Acm2; , 4<n"P0.9.9AGEWAY Ill L _' ; SERVICE ORRIOOR Ii_—- —Hid SERVICE AREA \ •1 I. I■ I. ru..,, , RETAIL 1 RETAIL 2 RETAIL 3 RETAIL T RETAIL S I1 I Ili �r ' `I i t _I■ ..... ■■■� MMEM■■■■�i■I�■E■■■■M■■■■■■■■■■.■■■i■■■■■■NI■■■■■ili■ ■ ■■■■M■C4M■3m■dI3■IZ■aCimIZEICIIIT■iIIMIC■19■211101 1IZmmSQii■iilM■■Eaam■IZG=■■W FLOOR PLANS GROUND FLOOR PLAN e 01037.04 0-8-Yo ATTACHMENT#8 A2 VILLAGE PLACE u NORTH ::::::::,,_____ RENTON.WASHINGTON REN[ON VDtAGE ASSOOATFS El El al DQ GAWP,/ PRQ/m/tip CaisoN LAYOUT OP HAJ� RrovroP�ewvn'r. ELEVATOR PENTHOUSE MECHANICAL ENCLOS RC ='q` +1v5 Noy' H/41/RT HOOT'4/A/1V . LIZIL SAd 3 +l/8.T a..v.n/ +/5 CANOPY ROOF PLAN • • ROOF DECK • —— -N//.7ER/O PKo✓i0E NL��N4 ov0¢ oax. -- L r - ■ ■ lo 'pRmP Mehiel.R✓E. -- 1 PRO%os /NIl:A'aG ORRINS drIL 16.4,7 • • • • ■ TENTH FLOOR PLAN FLOOR PLANS 87037.04 8-9-10 ATTACHMENT#9 A3 VILLAGE PLACE NORTH RENTON,WASHINGTON -• RENTON VILLAGE ASSOCIATES Callison I95' rum9kY9 orN 1.0-7 I 7C L 1-IL ✓o JI 6wT _�1 YTIM I c.o. NK xi- u' d sk, u rff 7!- u' sell al • Iy1f I ! .o ?: Eli '' ,• IORC �yNTEC. 1 I Lu.S) .@w.$) FeNa ovrv_E AaelurKi ETAn_n6. It 1 LEVQ 5(aE7 5 III eeseam. 7f p = /y C11MY YNK (i). a TA..'-C� do IIC Il 10x S KEY, �- 10:1=6ALL. M9� 6"'.004..0V..' .Iy5FAr8E 9C 0 16C ib 19 Ir� i.p�p�yNE ��"�� ya,N js) -nits FLma. 1 O /l-{06i11. wrnePu . b...,14 cnkrn. o-4A.T RHESIA, pR re N0,011-. :-# REfA1L fORKl AI4 u..r.a ZMcOLx s), 21c RRT.wRED r' iORYJNK: pta✓/ + oN SEE B RS 26 ON 517E.IN RESERVE \ 99 IN C,GfNfi,E '66l 5'MNo.{Ro,/26G.vnP4-'1S • Tin 1 4 �� 2 `m' 26.7ZGrePAG>•(�rAYaw�� OFFICE fA IO2kN OLEVEL 6 PLAN O LEVELS 2,3,4,5 PLAN O GRADE LEVEL PLAN EEpol.m OIL s Ne GARAGE PLANS M1eo' 1410. I.+o fd,$,u • _@Icwc546 T STD.s5FN$r7rn.I000 USE 010. 02*2*Cf" 5JD-ibihl+ 0PK 0002*e0�nn 119 SENcB IN gtN JC, ,Fne 165 06 9_49 �. Ca`,P t SYYTDrs.l. 60 cA666-,LEVES5 y.b I � LEVa_Z oco- 86 I 40 1u 714 511M/Y*R.0,4700*4740225 1A'65 Olt 4°°E 11429M 8610.4TL 576 EELNL- bY. 9T 99 Lela.5 DWI,E 67 57 14+ °,�-rem.wer (y�yn..a.en) 9 ST.w- 1-20-9�1 0e0i2 l�.NE Nf�l3ERLE aN SIB 1200E 594 315 909 t .wnc. 111 ba+trs IN 2EsEz� ATTACHMENT#11 „1, A4.5 (rl / .h. \i4YII VI/n A‘a d ;r -/ h.OKAvy WAY ii --.1'` :z. $01,10m INI,I awe j/^ I re a . Pro16 X wa i J ctnu /C�1\ 1 i un f/ ; �r ^v�"3° ;� 1 �;9yKyy b WDED�NN'D HWD WIKJ6k11Ny ° -Y i^ l /xekaG6 c so,wo zr a u ownl ° fo oie/ugrtYR : i 7 . . , (IIIIII ! L.�/ ` / a vain D.xlo.w,000 CO o. �BOP'RmR / t / r _ / y rA06DiCFf av,• / 7 l j j �� m�' / PARKING ? / 3 / / / �J is / /ewrvec awns*D GARAGE ' ll- / / g 1 / ii 'mil l l / w µ��N , o Mt*, w wig T141�IF'(WAy( I\ 1 / / / / \ _ .l� 0�7AM D full I bn •IDfN.. / / / r y� ' I'" re y / oFFE/ TAIL ; )4.0 / // / TOWER _ + I li / I y/� ,,,,,,.....,/, rr•u.s / ' 7L ! y,/ ,/ l l e6uro60 f6NA .Y4 I / q•WP ff.K.b / ,1/ // f4®D iAt 61..YI.D✓' +1648 O.p��J i / .91 U4 ! / /% / s4 // V 51DFbD•ODArkI °¢Y �/ �R / // .... C� \l 1� wN•1 k.,,f cur w .�-!" i/ L`�/��� r �lbr'woo o ad 'Cu" `4,.� €'•�v� e a>nN •+mm v� /' ! j i/ l % feel, • ,. e � a vwrD•vn.*Dow) uube�r1; _ RETAIL L-g1 o-_ear ��'-� x ;i: / : jo ., ; — _ « F,, / • • Da6zrtaa nmuE F . _ $n i O / / / 1 ymir MO w 4D � _ �, ` B¢¢,wpaw 9 YAY N gAV6 ! / +/ ERrirw621° ` VI BDGf/.91t� ::I i i i a // / 1 I !_:"/ ory1o�"wniWi i L�) \ mNn>vxo+� a o_ rf'w.b / li l // / J sauamr \` b. VJ I {IfLNN/w�rop..1�EYlOD IEVa\. ru5r0. 7 Or:— / ,. EgJD p a I 1 I / 50M/4, rDAwbto /�li be3 (C 8 „Irk�+����� WND yVI ` ! 1 gwl`61 W�V I �/ NWX4Wlh PIR,0rly .q\ 46l M ��_z` ,T (� 1 fb00 ID/IICil`JQ1N6 L� H'i DDpDDbr°Uwp hO40 1 WI LDINa I `>aPnbbFeba. '•L W.c.rr.sor re 6�NS•( y �� n 11 1 Ff s.. \ 1 l c .H¢4'.n,''''MD n rl eMD. 1.MDw) N'9.q i l i 1 ���\ ^\ \\ t /���1 'Cr., 10 N fl.Pt6 NI `a 1 \ n 1\ \ r 2 FM I1 ,� 1 / 1 ( •\ ;jam l I,I i ``-_\ `J Lam._ vmw; �•• {Q,..- l -n 1 \���_�` v..e$liv'. ale ;' Swne •• ...f. :'`,1 rsm / p YO r I\ --- 'lai�:.'m'�-,`\ `� f�Il ./ L ,e) >l / •z W F.a -) I �/�� \ fG?ccr, L,c'� ¢o.'W ::::::::::.4„.;.f.f.i...:::::-.,-,,,,,ri-„,41:- V '/ W �j 1 v ��\ \\ / rr�� a_ ii_ —'l\/ ` � _._/� �� Q�\ \\� j�►� ��;L i wnNe �i�`" d Oa\ +� s9e1 i \ g 61N/V, /, mmw.vameb:- ' //i u wraaeulw. `_`\` / s �°rPPnP, 15.. r , n M1 %� ��> l�iy` (W'3 Q a vat , ice , — (�—� � c' r:oxo ! j ° _ �`�\) 5./fE J .T. r°NO�16��P�r��� \ D µ p `� � �W > ` v Y vi"W� `) ��` / ON61ZFN10N P PLL /` — f nvE iEe• E5 fl„Eir 5% �— �.� `--- a��) r :. rr 3o.ry VKAINA66 ?MY %kg NIGAWAy W 1 __ ----_ _ /'`I / o loN Mc 406 wD mom- F ` -- _ — / �wDy K, e. ._— L 7 JOB#9009 B/ly C-�.-Th- 22 2 \F 1 • • Fred H..Knack : :State of Washington. • • - . :`263Rainier'Ave:.Sr#204;. Department of;Transportation Renton., Washington;98056,•.:, "•` ' ' :"Highway:Administration'Building Olympia,:Washington'98504 .,. - • 63; 68,74, 86 03, 32`::69;:89_ • James E:Banker :• - Sound Ford, Inc.` - • 4.05 S. Seventh Street. ,'. 750 Rainier Ave. S.' Renton,=Washington.98055 - . • Renton, Washington 98055 ' 02, 34 35 ` Steve Hagen:. Castagno Brothers.Inc. • • • ' • Seattle CityLi ht_ •:423;Seventh:Ave:. - 1•015.Third.Ave. , •Renton, Washington 98055 • - .Seattle, Washington 98104: 2:5' • 'Eugene.Horbach.. :Holiday Inm. i?.O: 'Box 598 •800 Rainier Ave:S.• - - . Bellevue Washington 98009 Renton, Washington 98055.-•• : • attn. Steve'Mindemann • ':Renton Talbot Delaware G.S:I._C:Realty Inc.•;,:. Ed,Cook • #700-333 TwinDolphin Drive.• -301.S.-Grady Way . - Redwood City,California :94065, : • Renton ;Washington :08'055- =• , Fred H. Knack State of Washington 263 Rainier Ave. S.#204 Department of Transportation Renton, Washington 98055 Highway Administration Building Olympia, Washington 98504 63, 68, 74, 86 03, 32, 69, 89 James E. Banker Sound Ford, Inc. 405 S. Seventh Street 750 Rainier Ave. S. Renton, Washington 98055 Renton, Washington 98055 02, 34 35 • Steve Hagen Castagno Brothers Inc. Seattle City Light 423 Seventh Ave. 1015 Third Ave. Renton, Washington 98055 Seattle, Washington 98104 25 Eugene Horbach Holiday Inn P.O. Box 598 800 Rainier Ave. S. , Bellevue, Washington 98009 Renton, Washington 98055 attn: Steve Mindemann 70 • Renton Talbot Delaware G.S.I.C. Realty Inc. Ed Cook #700 -333 Twin Dolphin Drive 301 S. Grady Way Redwood City, California 94065 Renton, Washington 98055 WHEN RECORDED RETURN TO: Office of the City Clerk •of Renton City Hall • C1 1055 South Grady Way CRenton,WA 98055 N Please print or type information WASHINGTON STATE RECORDER'S Cover Sheet(RCW 65.04) gmf Document Title(s)(or transactions contained therein):(all areas applicable to your document must be filled in) Q) 1.Rescission of Declaration of Covenant Reference Number(s)of Documents assigned or released: King County Recording No.9210290251 Additional reference#'s on page of document Grantor(s)(Last name first,then first name and initials) 0 1.City of Renton [ ]Additional names on page of document. Grantee(s)(Last name first,then first name and initials) 1.RVA Center LLC,successors in interest to Renton Village Associates [ ]Additional names on page of document. GCA Legal description(abbreviated:i.e.lot,block,plat or section,township,range) 1.Legal Description: That portion of Blocks 11, 12, 14,and 15,CD Williams Earlington Garden Addition Division No. 1 as recorded in Vol 17 of plats,page 74,Records of King County,WA. sc Assessor's Property Tax Parcel/Account Number 192305-9043 The Auditor/Recorder will rely on the information provided on the form. The staff will not read the document to verify the accuracy or completeness of the indexing information provided herein. c• • • r 30272 • I " AFTER RECORDING RETURN TO: WHEN RECORDED RETURN TO: Office of the City Clerk Renton City Hall 1055 South Grady Way Renton,WA 98055 RESCISSION OF DECLARATION OF COVENANT f THIS RESCISSION OF DECLARATION OF COVENANT ("Covenant") is made this /3 day of , 199$,by RVA CENTER LLC, successor in interest to RENTON VILLA ASSOCIA ES ("Declarant") and rescinds that certain Covenant for future C`? roadway dedication recorded under King County Recording No. 9210290251. r RECITALS A. Declarant owns certain real property located within the Renton Village Shopping Center in the City of Renton("City"),which is legally described in Exhibit A hereto and incorporated herein by reference ("Property"). B. In 1992, Declarant, as Renton Village Associates, intended to extend an improved road to be,called Lake Avenue South, and legally described on Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference("Roadway"),through its Property in conjunction with the construction of an office building on its Property. The Covenant was recorded to implement a condition of the City's approve of Site Plan File No. SA-078-90 for future dedication of the Roadway. C. Declarant has since abandoned its office building development. Any Future development on the Property will undergo independent,future review. Since Site Plan file No. SA-078-90 has been abandoned,the covenant also should be rescinded. D. Paragraph 2 of the Covenant provides that prior to completion of the dedication, this Covenant may be amended and/or terminated upon the consent of the City. 30273 1 • NOW, THEREFORE: 1. The Declarant and the City of Renton hereby rescind the Declaration of Covenant filed against the Property under King County Recording No. 9210290251, a copy of which is attached hereto. IN WITNESS WHEREOF this Covenant is executed effective upon the date first written above. RVA CENTER LLC a Washington limited liability company By: SMG CENTER LLC •` .1 OF REjy2" G eve % . Its anaging Member Approved: ��- SEAL * City of Renton bd' ,' ��ATED SEP • �������� Jesse Tanner mite g; Mayor ATTEST e STATE OF WASHINGTON ) Marilyn 3. etersen, City Clerk ) ss. COUNTY OF KING CP) . ) ���O On this � day of CC' n r, 1998, before me personally appeared to me known to be the Managing Member in the Limited Liability Company that executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said company, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that he was authorized to execute said instrument and that the seal affixed is the corporate seal of said company. IN WITNESS WHEREOF I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day • and year first above written. CHRISTINE A PRiCF C ,cS_ \- 1A CC STATE OF WASH Nf,t0N (Signature) NOTARY a ctiHl 'C Mt COMMISSION EXPIRES9'?1-02 (Name legibly printed or stamped) - (Seal or stamp), Notary Publiicin and for the State of Washington, residing at J L(24- uz. . My appointment expires Of -2rj - (7 Z 30273 2 . I, • �.- r..•---- �� EXHIBIT A 2 of 3 - - B ' That portion of $lock■ 11,12,14 and 15, C.D. Hillmans Eariin$ton , Carden Addition %violon No. 1 as recorded in Volume 17 of 1 Page 74, Records of Xing County, Washington, rwPlats, . ` of vacated 94th Aven4e South, vacated 6thAvenue�South, 'acatsiona 9th Avenuo .South, vacated 9th Place South, a ua South • and the vacated ;Heys between 9th Avenue Southteand19th Place•South and also betueen I- place South and loth Aveuu. South, all vacated . / unuer Ordinance 20,1 of the City of Renton ana resat portion of the northeast quarter of Section 19, rounahip 23 North, Range 5 East W.H. in King County, Washington, more particularly described as followat • Commrie i .I ng at the northeast capper of the southwest quarter of, eald northeast quarter; thanes $ 01 04'08" W along the oast line of said , aouthw., t quarter, a diatarnce of 230.02 feet; thence N 89044'02" W ` a distance of 18.,ZB fees to the TRUE POINT OF AEGxNHIHO' thence 5 61°42'59" W. a distance of 258.92 fest; thsnc. $ 00°02'16'. E. A di,tanoe of 248.94 feet to the cartberly margin of Primary State in Highway No.. 1. Jct. SSH No. 2-N to Zer. Pah No. 2 in Renton (also , known as State Road No. 401) am approved October 31, 1961-the latest +; mv revision being NOwawber 7,19861 thence weaterlysnorthve$terlr and 0 nartherly.along said margin the folloCNI ging coursees N 89 49'09" W Cv A cistanca of 44.72 (eat; thence 5' 8323'09".W, a diatance•of 82.06' tr, - feet.; thence N 89°54'45" W, a distance of 241.66 feet to a point On a ; curve having a radius of 390.8 feet and having a radial bearing of $ 11 Q5'11"°W; thence northvosterly along said curve through a central angle of )2 52'06", an arc dl,atance of 224.19 feet; thence N40°02,41" W a distance of 150.00 feet; thence along a tangent Curve the left • trith ; radius of 288.8 feat through a central angle of 16 15'36", an arc Ciotance of 81.96 feet; thence ,eavin�'' N %7'27" E. a distance of 248685 feet; thence S 70 00 Q0 E, a distance of (pet; thence N Oo 51'26" E. a distance of 286.24 fast thence alongt • 1' westerly •xt■ntion aon the south line 1lA aap 5tanda:d 011 Com of land described in lease to Company of California dated January 21,1964. N 89°28' 13" E.a distance of 159.53 feet; thence leaving 0I a distance of 181.18 feet to the southerly emat maaid rgin Gradyth tine HWayQ(alea W, known ■s Secondary State Highway No. 1-L)Ybeina 100 heat vid*Y pre '• cal established) thence flOrtheASte=�y ale 4 7° 'presently ' �' a diet � said aeuthfxly >eargin A 77°2B'2bM E. 0 aoc. of 144.07 fast to the northeast corns - of land described in said lease to Standard Oil .Company of California; thence S along the east line of said ,land. a di _ 0the out E . east corner of land described in Said hoes ofh Zle S 821328 eo the mouth- along the south line of said, a diet leis+j thence 5 89 28'l3" Y said dead: Iln■ S 01°35'52" E, a distancecs ooff. 113,79tf..t toes c leaving a radius of 245.00 feet and having a radial boning fast Ito o 8'18" ;wing thence southeasterly along said curve ring of 8 89 Zg'lg�. >r� an are distance of 176. through a central anal. of 4i°il'18"; L2 feet; [nonce 5 41 43'00" E. ; distance of 201.41 fest to a ta.osont curve to the left having a radiu* of 245.00 fear; . [honor southeasterly along sold curve c; rough a central aAla of 48001'02", an arc distance 205.32 feet; thence. S 09°44'02" E. a distant.■ of 111.05 free to ten. 'fie c POINT nr nr.-.vuew.• AMfi3t .T.minl 'TV�TT7TIJi1W lTflflMAvv7 1A7.7. 7.TG A(17. T YV.� Ab:CT nu" RR/7.T/TT • • • Aft 3*f/.l3 Od6 EXITInIT A. 3 of 3 me A./. .4 .! .or C ` That portion of Block 12. C.O. Hillman's Eariiagtort Garden Addition uiYibion No. 1 as recorded in Volume 17 of Plats, Pagb 74, Raaord4 W Of King County, Washington, together with portion of vacated 96th Avenue South, vacated 9th ;-'enun South and the Vacated alley between. 9th Avenge South and 9th T...•;e South, all vacated under Ordinance 2051 h of the Cicy. of Renton and Chat portion of the ear=hnaat quarter of Section 19, Township 2l North, Range 5 East,.W.H. in King County, Warning:on, morn particularly described an follower ,r , 1 Commencing at ens northeast co ner of the gouthveet IXnorT,llnast quarter; thence S 01�04'08►" W along the eastquarter of Said . l, n of said al - southwest quarter, a distance of 230.02 feet; Chance N 89 44'02° air U= a - iatance of 18.28 t'n■x to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; thence Con- troVI Cinuina N 89 :•4 02' W. a distance of 111.05 feet to a tan ant Curve a to the right having a radius of 245 feat- thence notthweaCiri along ul 'laid curve through a central angli. of 48%1'02", are arc distance of ^• 205.32 [eat; mango N 41°43'00" W,.�� , :. distano■ of 20l.41 Cute to a.a. tangent curve to the right having a radius of o245 feet; thence northarly ..t Q along ssia curve through a central angle of 41 11.18" of 176_12 feet; thence N 01°35'52" W. a diatince of 13.79 foot to distance '"I - ' . point on the gout! line of land described. in leafs to d,4 Company of California dated January21, 1964; thence NS89°28 Oil '',:s.l - -,, along said auuth. line, a distance of 10.09 feet to the southeast NI —La cornerof said :and; thence N 00o)1'47" W along the nagt line of z;= • said land; a di..cance of 211.12 feet to the southerly margin of • f'p Grady Way Calms known as Secondary Sate Highway No. 1-L) being N w i00 feet in width as pr<esnntlg established; thence northeneterly r '1' along said south margin, N 77 78'26" I, a distance of to a tangent curve to cha Left having a radius of 1311.71 fe55 feet s `�; fast; 7) r• thence along said curve through a central angle of 11 14'08", an V) . - arc distant. of 758.84 feet to a point on the oust line of land described in Exhibit "A" of Quit Claim Used tinder Xing County Recording a - No. 8208270353; thence leaving said south margin of (ady Way, •• S 01°04'00" W along said we4t lino, a dietsncr of 840.76 [set to y the north margin of Renton Village Place as conveyed to the City of Renton under King County Recording No. 514753101 chance N 89°44'02" W. y1 a distant. of 372.42 feet along th. north margin Of said Renton 1 Village Plag. to the east margin of vacated said 96th Avenue South; thence S 01 04.08" w along maid east margin, a distance of 60.01 feet to the 'enthwise corner of said Renton Village Place; Chance N 89o44'02'• W. a distance of 48.28 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. • Rnnl43, Txnn1 9T7IT ITATiIAi lTnnUT\TT7T /077 7TC 0n7 T VVJ Qh:PT nuT QR/7.T/TT 1 • a. �.•.... • EXHIBIT B . Legal Description • Proposed Right of.Wav � I That Dortion of Lots "0" and "C'•, City of Renton Lot Line • Adjustment No. 001-80 which lime it. ;he northeast quarter of Section 19, Township 23 North, Range 5 F t,W.H. as shown in instrument under King County Recording No. 0911139000 • described as follows: W • u Commencing at the northeast corner of the southwest quarterQ of said norther .: quarter; thence SOl'04'00"W along the east x lino of said southwest quarter, a distance of 250.02 feet; x corner S89'44'02"E, a distance of 30.00 ;pet to the r- southwest cornr of South Renton Village Place as cOnvwyed xx .I to the City of Renton under King County Auditor's File No. i = 5475310; said point being the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; thence NOi•o4'08"E along the treat line thareaf, a distances d o! 6O.01 feet to tho northwest Corner thereof= thence W al N99 44'OZ'W, a gistaetite of 1fi0. i6 feet to a tangent curve to `a •• the right having a radius of l85 feet; thence northwesterly vix ; vl; ii along said Curve through a central angle of 40•01.'02", an ;. -in ,; arc distance of 155.04 feet; thence N41.43'O0"!a a distance of 201.41 fags; to a tangent curve to the right havinga r` }tw-`. I radius of 105 feet; thence northerly alontt said curve through a central anple of 41'11'18", an arc distance of ' 1...4 �: 32.99 feet; thence NOO.3.�'2B"E, a distance of 192.95 feet ,/,� i. to a tangent curve to the riaht having a radius of 55 feet; t thence northeasterly along said curve through a central r. angle of 7G'55'so", an arc distance of 73.05 feet to the i .-' southerly right of way line of South Grady Way (State ,_ar. .. Highway Na.. 1-L); thence 577.20'26"W along said southerly x r" right of wayline, distance of point en a Y o , g160.42 feet to a :-D, , : curve concaved to the southwest havinn a radius of 55 feet; � ; fl a radial line of said curvy through said point hearing 1 N12 31 3q"il; thence poutheasterly along said curve through a :.1 • Csa central angle, of 1O0.55'42", an arc distance of 96.00 feet' ® thence SOi"35'32'E, a distance of i41.35 feet to an angle .4 point on said Lot "C"; thence south and southeasterly along the southwesterly margin of said Lot "C" the following ' 1 • .4 cduresz S01"35'52"E, a diStance of 13.79 feet to a tangent U CDcurve to the left having a radius of 2i5 feet; thence Southeasterly along said curve through a central angle of F a) 41•11'18", an arc distance of 176.12 feet; thence S41.43'00"E, a distance of 201.41 feet to a tangent curve to 7 the left having a radius of 245 feet; thence southeasterly n along said curve through a central angle of 48'01'02", an arc distance of 205.32 feet; thence 689°44'02"E, a distance 159_33 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. J i R. Nis 9 -I-92 v1w4INih ir 1 fi ,c.A 96064 I F`.51tl� q be �_4' • ' nrna Jmnr11 'Tv T7TIJi1W crnnAmwr I.177 7.TQ An7 T YV.4 /.fv:CT nTT. QR'7.T/TT N- - • D 9901210221 _ r EXHIBIT y, 0 . r +, AREAS 71 PROPOSED RIGHT OF WAY 57,860 SG.FT.s 341,279 SO.FT.2 'r' ,1�', s LGT C-1 2f4.3a7 SQ.FTs "''"� " • - LOT C-2 -..Ar A. y}�. t s ,V.' r G'F LI 'p?.2h i / (il\‘ � f 4 _j, stSrOej,i's r•'..° I ? 04•45- i Alf.e Z Ir 7�rs�0 %. fJAoo 4�•$ J • ‘. t LOT �, lia a� * ; : LOT C_t 3 � ' ! `io7 s4I : •=l C Z Tal.g ` 4 • +ate " e i� as �-----LOT 'C" 4 i A ~ , a,,-1o,a.y:Es a. _ to-ool-e9 a I% 1 iii • �; Cr aax,F �r rar�FR ` IF t i�r'�•" 1. - ''' 107 �� s^ Xrale•sfK•s A7 i RI • gar TAW2J 4,d61sr. :11 3 , { • . iii tr. O a �ppy � W 7M p � L' y *Ao_ t. ► Qo7tMd rK�A -I . . -5-- .,..misipir _ . N. ,a; • I r, Te f- $ ' 1 for"rAl fr'rwira� Ye.e.o4w It Ps 16 ' I ti, �� .•. j� ,di+ Ye armor ? S ,--� S ,j i 3 • T k. OZ, • •- . •.,, �.. .�[,:•. . ' ?c). ID 32xiQ - 25xi , • • j ', • , SA-018-90 M . '' • g P. TRI$ DECLARATION! OP COVENANT ("Covenant•) 'le itade thin 2 1 z i day of C-lt 7t'6F f� _ , i991. by Oy VILLAGE ASsoCIATES (-Declarant') for a future roadway dedication„ • A. Declarant owns certain real property located within the t - Renton Village Shopping Canter in the City of Renton ('City) , which Le hilly described in $ il�tt bit A hereto and incorporated 3 • "I' herein, by' reference (0Piropexty").' , - •- D. Declarant intends to extend an imprtved road Wipe called la]Ce Avenue south, and legally described on l _bi N, • • attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference ("Roadieym) . through its Property in conjunction with the j construction of an office building on its Property. This . I Covenant is recorded to ieplesent a condition of the City'e . apP sit4 lan Pile No. SA-070-90 for future dedication of fhe Roadway. ----..-�,.. - ' Row, therefore, d:olarant hereby declbree, conveys and eetabliehes the following covenant: _ • • i. Oblivaj. t cute Romd Rightvatliay,, Declarant hereby covenants and agroee to dedicate to the City the right-of- • way and iaprove ants constituting the Roadway to the city to be used and 'maintained as a public en rest upon a request by the • cl City. . Q2. .ag_venant oho i.t th9 Land_ This covenant shall . CD with l • land and be binds • u. .n an • "�t : ..�:ra • . fen • ir:siv • + ra..1.-)114:1117514771K2 rilrenFilf • Upon dedication, CIact s Covenant shall term nate automat cally without any further CDion, by Declarant or any other party. Prior to completion of such dedication, this covenant may be aMended and/or terminated . . ;, only upon the express consent of the City. Q O.T oiaa7.# fl.9.12 • i S.iLtt. • 7.Tnf3ii Tmnn7 'TV,Tmi iw annMAAV'i LA7.z 7.T5 An7. T XV.� Rb:ct nH.T: RB/7.T/TT • • • I IN WITNESS WHENEOP, this covenant is executed effective upon the. date first above written. - EN ON Vet L71GE ASSOCIATES,. • R a • Washington general partnership tal It!' Ge era Pa er , • Exhibit A Legal Description of Property r r-• Exhibit U -- Legal Dancription of ltooad Right-of-way Y STATE op WAszzmarots ) cic ) u fK CoONTY OF 1GYfC ) sa• W On this 15r day of fe-r&Ek , 1992, before se, a .,I Notary Public h for the State at Naehington, peraonally M appeared/ • ' personally known to Ma • (oar proved to Me ; W La on the ban n of sat efa ory evidence) to be the person who executed this instrument, on oath stated that .11 was MC o authorized to execute the instrument, and acknowledged it as the General Partner of RENTON VILLAGE ASSOCIATES to be the free and ' . n j voluntary act and deed of said corporation tor the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. i., IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand- and official z neal the day and year first above written. W), (V 445N. ,--- NOTARY PUBLIC n and for the State ,; • .4 eY meg of Washington, residing et p [�. CDs i -,w • . Ny appointment expires /c -1 9•� II 0') ta ApPti..14u04ek..i . 0') % Irsglef - \seep:siva-id ,t • avat\olo0 Ami,7_,.in t S.a6a1■ 2 • 4 CTO E Z2I11OO 'IVdIOIMf1W QOOMthIV'I L9ZZ ZT9 90Z I XVd 96:CT 11HI 96/ZT/TT 11/12/98 THU 13:48 FAX 1 2061 512 2267 LAKEWOODMUNICIPAL COURT LIU14 .-: 111471 V i ._.______. • t'L\ • .-.6- . i All 1 OA ' .-1-i 0 in, k IVA 0 ' it irilir "IOW.0.40. : -_,.d A i I (I.- L ...,, 0 O� ' •,sue,.1 0k 1, , A f u '. -{ i1 .1 . wall op. .zL`t N W U w, pS 1`kie. tn O 0 4 �{{ .Al A i• •' :1J 11 • f �V'a'I1 it 1 b. rel ,- toeit/ r, 1 CD Vii \x., 0411 i p,. {ropr k Uh. a, 1 i� '" 1 filly ,v .4 O w D 1 t+ :. PA i 1 N 14" s �0 1. +a -- o • ki -Pa at .e..k, 4 1 N6 04'N4"P .480.774 i `i• 1 1 IITA1 `, •, 1 . (61 cal { 1 (- ill i \i‘k % ) +� ` tt C 1 J bA \-. �� — .- . — 1...� _ of 4•3•1_ •__..m...?2 --= .1,,,avrasivc....,..7fol‘...,....e„.hi ,e ,C V al '' a.. Gy . . • • • • ExHIDIT A.2 of 3 ?hat portion of Blocks 11,12,14 and 15, C. 1 Garden Addition Mythic(' No. U, Niilui . Farlingtot� Page 74Records 0. l a. =ecQrded ill Yolm* 17 of plats, . � ofvacated9YthAvanueSouth of Xing tvacatadi9 ton. LoaotMr with portions 6th Avenue South, sa►catad Q 9th Avenue .South, vacated 9th Place South, vacated 10th Avenue South 0 and the vacated ,alleys tocueen 9Ch Avenue South and 9th Place South and also betue.n ,.- Place South and 10th Avenue South, all vacated v"� under Ordinance 2G;,a of the City of Renton and Chat portion of the CZ northeast quarter of Scction ..19, foarnahip 23 North, Range 5 East, CZ f 1. in King County, Washington, more particularly deacribed as - N. Commencing at the northeast corer of the southwest 'I, northeastquarter; thence04'08" Qu4ttet Of said ti 5 O1 W along the aaat line of said acouthyrat quarts, a distance of 230.02 Lest; thence N 89044'02" w, a distance of 18.28 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; thence S 61°42'59" W. a diatauce of 258.92 teeti thence S 00 02'16' E, a dirt;nc.. of 2�.8.9a feet to the northerly margin of Primary • to' Highway No. 1. Jet. SSN No, 2-N to :;,r. Peh No. 2 in Renton (also State 'kno.rn as State Road No. 405) as approved October 31 1961 . (Alas revision being N4veraber 7.1996: thence uesterlyanorthvestea;ly and OaL norther: aloe said 9 y K id margin the foilo�ing coursed' H 89 49'09" W, a cietance of 44.02 feet; thence S 83 23'09" W, a diatanes-of' 82.06' . feet; thence N O9 S4'45" u, a dletaace of 241.66 feet to a point on a curve having a radios of 390.8 fast and having a radial bearing of 5 17 05.13"0; thence northwesterly along said curve through a centralci angle of 32 52'06", an arc distance of 224.19 feat; thence N 40°02'41,. w t a dlaCance of 150.00 feet; thence alcng a cement curve is the left with a radius of 288.8 feat through a central angl ,. an arc. Ciatance of 81.96 feet; thence leaving Said•margin.of l6 lN l4°1y 27 E, a distance of 248b85 fame; thence S 70 00'00' E. a diatano■ of 98,00 •, fret; thence N 00 51'26" E. A diatancu of 286.24 feet thence along the ueacerly •ntantion a:.d the eolith line of land ds.ctibed. iti lasso to , Standard Oil Company of California dated January 2111964, N 89°28'13" E. a distance of 159.53 feet; thence leaving a distance of 1_81.18 font to the southerlyamarginaid Mun of GradyliamNWayo71y also'47 w, Unarm Le Secondary State Highway No. 1-L) being 100 feet vide aspr ■stablish.dl thence northeasterly along said southerly Margin N 77°28'26"y a distant■- of 144.07 fact to the northeast corner of land deacribadZ 26 E. in said lease to Standard Oil Company of California' thaa,Ce S 0 , M , along the salt lino of said land, a dlota nce of 211.12 feet' 0 he1 of -. . east corner of land described in ■aid lamas; ° '13".the south-- . along the south line of said, a diet thanes S 89 28 13 w said south line S o °of area of 10.09 toot; Charier leaving radius so of i43.00 feet° 52" E, a distance of 13.79 footsies a curve having ahradice soof4245.00l along having a tadtal bearing of 6 89028' '' y said cures through s central 18 Yi an arc distance of 176.i2 foot; chance S 41 43'00" E, a distance ofuf o201.41� feet to a tangent curve to the left having a radius of 245.00 foot; th..nre souchsaat■rly along sand curve through a central angle of 48°01'02". an arc distance 205.32 feet; thence S 89°44'02" E. a distance of 111.05 feat to thA '-lit r Dn1MY' flc 4.-.-vw.,,a,.- CTf1Fi3i .T.NIlfl7 'TVAMTtJI1W .(Tfl(IMMNV'T LA7.7. 7.T� A07. T WARb:CT ANTRR/7.T/TT n . • • w EV/13 =ital. • g 3 b £XIIXBIT A 3 of 3 ./. •e tile.- ;gyp7- C ., L That portion of Block 12, C.D. Hillman's Earlihascry Garden Addition l)iviaion No. 1 as tecoraed in Volume 17 of Plata, Page 74, Aacat;da of King County, Washington, together with portions o Avenue South, vacated 9ti . ,unue South of vacated 96th gnu the vacated alley b•tWger 9th Avenue South and 9th 1;„.;e South, all vacated under Ordinance 2051 ,� of the City of Reason and that portion of the northeast quarter of • Section 19, Township 23 North, Range 6 East, W.M. in Kane County, Wasnin6:or;, toots particularly desct:ibgd as follovae " "IC Comiaancirig at she northeast corner of the aeuthvSat Quarter of aaid ar , northeast quarter; thence S 01 04'08" u along Cho east lige of 'aid bouthuest quattar, a distance of 250.02 feet; Chance N 89 44'Q2" WI e)U W ' a Ulatailca of 18.28 (Rat to thw TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; t2zonce con-, Ho V , .I r_inuirig N 89 :.4'02" hl, a distance of 111.05 feet to a tangent cures to the right having a radius of 245 feet; Chance north�r.ete�riy along . ,/44 $ n 1 said Curve through a central anglo. of 48 O1'02", an arc diata,rce of 0 -~'-' ! l 205.32 feet; thence N 41°43'00" W, distance of 201.41 fast te' a • '• tangent •curve to the tight having a radius of 245 feet; Jthence northerly `o` : along said curve through a central angle of 41°11.15" au arc diatancb '• of 176.12 feet; r.I enca N 0L95'52'• tin° � . W. a distance of 13,79 feet to a point on the sow line of land dascrLbed. in lease to Standar* oil 1 Company of C..lifornia dated January 21, 1964: thence o • -r along said south line, a distance of 10.09 feet to N 89 15" E. �'".., t career ofo 47,, by soutthh east said :and: thence N 00 31 u along the oast lien of Ic ►-- • , Said land; a di..sante of 211.12 feet to the aouthar],y margin of 5,Ica. Grady %►ay (also Known as Secondary State Highway No. i-l.) bOing c� .0 100 feat in uidth AS preaentLsr established; thence northeaatatCly • r: '? along said bauth margin. N 77 28'26" E. a distance of 209.55 lust ...vt; to a tangent curve to trio left having a radius of 386$.7l feet: ► -•• thanca along said curve tnrounh a central angle of 11 14'08", an _ 1 - arc distance of 738.84 lust to a point on the vest line of land 4°eoribe4 in Exhibit "A" of Quit Claim peed under King County Recording y No. 820a/70355; thence leaving said Rough marlin of"rwady Way, • S 01004'08" W along said vaat line, a distance of 840.76 feet to ;; , ! the unrth margin of Anton Village Place as egrive _ _ of Renton under King. County ReCo>rding Na. 5475310red co the" CLty 1 thence N 89°44'02" W, a distance of 372.42 feet along thy north margin of said Manton I ! Village Pile to the east margin of vacated said 96th Avenue South; thence S 01 04'O8" N along maid mast margin. A dietahcn of 60.01 • feetesto the gouthueat corner of laid Renton Villas., Place; thence N 89 44'02" tit, a -dletanc. at 48.28 [pet to the TflUC POINT OF BEGINNING. I • • • • SITnr#1 T.Nilfll 'TE1.TT7T'Ji1W R(lflM�AHT LAzZ 7.T5 AOZ T INA RV:CT GM. RR/7.T/TT • 1 o � r o aft • • • • • • • • • • • 0 • • • FILED for Record at Request o' 1!. . i .. L.I. Cb,dc-C 9TO E1 mop 'IVdIOINIlx 100M2?IV'I L9ZZ ZTS 90Z T XVd OS:Ci nH.T. R8/7..T/TT • • • _. AY EXi;IBZT B Lecial Descripcion - l' . Piropg rj Right of "Wav That portion of Lots "B" and 'C". City of Renton Lot Line Adjustment No.. OOl-as which lips i.. .he. northeasL war Section 19, TownshipNorth. 23 E_s q ter a1 instrument under King CountyRecordv 9 ing No. aill3900$h n in described as follows,: • ~, Commencing at th:, northeast corker of the southwest quarter ea said northea•.: quarter; thence 501'04'0B"W along the east enline of said southwest,quarter, a distance of 250.02 feet; Y thence S89.44'02"E, a diet,ance or 30.00 feet to the southwest corner of South Renton Village Place as conveyed .x I to the City of Renton under King County Auditor's File No. ,- 5475310; said point being the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING- thence NO1.6o4'08"E along the west line thereof, a distance „�, of 60.01 feet to the northwest corner thereof; thence L.) I N89'44 02"14, a distance of 160. 16 feet to a tangent curve to „yes the right having a radius of 165 fee! thence northwesterly e, along said curve through a central angle of 40'01■02", an -so • arc distance of 155.04 feet; thence N41.42'0O"SJ, a diotance �,,, � of 201,41 feet to a tangent curve to the right having a t �,= radius of 1B5 feet; thence northerly along said curve LL . through a central angle of 41'111'10", an arc d'istanCe of "g`h I. t •132.69 feet; thence NO0'32'2B"E, a distance of 192_05 feet '. ,-. to a tangent curve to the rioht having a radius of 315 feet; JiI- thence northeasterly along said curve throU4h a central '- 7.3 angle of 7fi'55'58", an arc distance of 73.6E feet to the W southerly right of way line of South Grady Way (State r-_ • Highway Na. 1-L) thence S77'26'26"W along said southerly , W r • f"; right of way line, a distance ofy $ o . 180.42 feet to a point on a • X.. . f4 Curve concaved to the southwest havin4 a radius of 55 feet; ��V. 0 f4 a radial line of said curve through said point bearing z� . N12 31 34-W; thence southeasterly along said curve through a ! y�_ ,n ' r"'I . central angle,of 10O'55'42", an arc distance of 96-88 feet; ~_`"•• f4 thence SOl'a5'32'E, a diStance of 141.55 feet to an angle V4 point on said Lot C ; thence south and southeasterly along 0 the southwesteriyntargin of said Lot "C" the following ' Couresf SO1"35 52��E, a distance of 33.79 feet to a tangent curve to the left having a radius of 245 feet; thence +' southeasterly along said curve through a central angle of ' el'11'18", an arc distance of 176,12 feet; thence ' 041'43'00"E, a distance of '201.42 feet to a tangent curve to . the left having a radius of 245 feet; thence southeasterly t along said curve through a central angle of 4Q'01'02-, an SF arc distance of 205.32 feet; thence 809'44'O2"E, a distance •t 159_33 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. 9-1-92 . so w.R44,4 de alw�k4 ` 4 06064 1T(1Pr3i T?Tnn'1 'Td,IT'1TV111T annumrin /A7.7. 7.Tc An7. T YVI nC:ei "I TIT QR/7.T/TT a'>Y0R9, _ —ctYrAm /304- 10- 12 /2,1 sv , -261-± 16\741,?)1gile F194/0a `'11191("d4 ILAQZS • 447b V921° 'M°1-)4rPr/P. sj14;41 • • itaAdevo pvimoo *. . -0 (veyyd) , rirraiS6Q -u I . sA-o-7g-1-0 Mr. Mel Wilson CITY OF RENTONThe November 7, 1990 Page 2 Transpo APR '1 5 1991 Group haeLIVED Table 1. Comparative Trip Generation ;rfY Cr Previous Studyi Current Proposals Difference Office Buildings Square Feet 730,000 864,500 +18% Employees 2,600 3,030 +17% Vehicles Trips(daily) 9,200 10,320 +12% Retail Square Feet 105,000 96,000 -9% Employees 240 260 +8% Vehicle Trips(daily) 6,200 5,760 -7% Total Vehicle Trips(daily) 15,400 16,080 +4% 1 Grady Wav Corridor Transportation Improvement Study Revised Draft Report,July 5, 1988, The TRANSPO Group. As shown in Table 1,while the level of development indicated by the current proposal will be somewhat greater and the trip generation somewhat higher than was projected for the subarea in the 1987 traffic study, the difference is not enough to justify an update of the traffic modeling and network assignments in the Impacted area. From the above comparison (which excludes the Sheraton Hotel and the Cinema), it can be seen that the current proposal envisions a full development scenario for the area which includes more office space but less retail space than was assumed in the July 1988 G y Way study. In to eneration, these differences are partially offsetting with a et-difference of a out 4 percent, amount we would not consider to be significant to There are two characteristics of the development which, because of their affect on trip gen- eration, deserve brief mention. The first concerns the type of employment activity in the office space. The employment both in the existing office space—Renton Place 1, 2, and S— and the proposed office development in Village Place North consists of high-tech/engineering activities, which have a considerably lower trip-generation rate than would occur at a typi- cal suburban office building with a collection of diverse business activities. The trip- generation rate used for both scenarios in this analysis reflects this consideration. The second trip-generation characteristic concerns the retail activity proposed for develop- ment as part of Village Place North. Due to its location, this new retail development will likely draw a significant percentage of its customers from the occupants of the adjacent office buildings. These customers will arrive and depart as walk trips rather than vehicle trips. This consideration also has been taken into account in determining the vehicle trip- generation rate for the retail component of the proposed development. •�. c —oils'ci� lij in31:•, 'ILI • II ..rrf I 1 ' ''111 ' . • _ r • •� rpk ..4„� •.i.:. c, w���.%J3,--a,,(,oc:t� ..�<•....::' °s:" "''�� ;"� • �C"�?6A�`Ls;.,.a,i..' qv„ u�.. z�r..r :R 'M k.. t. , ,,... l k.". •;;;;i-, r' .-Y�.k' ,,;» a at ,y. x ' r« <> az ..;Yw. <u ^v;.. s M��, ria1a%; �sa q `.t: xr ;"aur��. V� � �d , Doing con- ;s-4, : .,; > r :d ;x_ .s >n.:v.::>< .1" .m' 'x .>--,,N.,_ :';%`s ;`r;,4t;: = -"n:; "'`' �`#.y .,.,:: ' . 'Lt`'•..„. ; ,,�y' . �" 1 f ,"f, ?, WSW..."" 'L..' �.r • ,, ,,,A':. ..9., .!:SYaa,.:Wrr.w..v Ja,..✓ro!v';r.•i>':C'i+'r.+'M'. i<'i ;"!` - y •44„ examiner to +Y� , .- :r<` - �•�; ., A I have been ; -.. : ^*^ - sl. ," it i r a� .. 0_ ;, w.,.,<< a»; ' ;� ' a; "` It Y ra.. .fir, . , a�F„ :'tea. oposed 10 .. `,r ix.� xe�<W,'• s£" -•tk,4, 3`3 gam ' � •• . , t tton Villagezimwm "" ;"' �. t,,,, s * ^A "„5y`pg, el area can't • » 'n T �A ?4 .` � G4 � l� 4ramm • . • ,m..vfKE',; .:,.. ..,••.;-rq t1' ' '3 e;!., i^S"` Pa,. "7 Ey .. ': :SE fw�.''�»�"w fµ.:ii.�:.:s ,R.�z::esk?v�::.;.Y.M.",,.iY�..: ,:�"s,.�.`'�i'*"'��t,' ....''"w.�.z ,.;.,,. u»„+'� ''� •; ,•,y,,z;;. . 'd x�- i L,....• g.'-,:.... t;,. ems: me extend- f- � t.S .stx`pr°33 w •e:*53`,w ,u '� �..". «x ;�'� :N.. `�.13....... x a x.•�• �, able and in „, '. � � f4 y,,, - 4 p, �, ' � `",,; :. µ�4 ".w. -4. i tip • >> � f Pq t R . '•., w`Pt»-,w,.;"�qF'' ..x•:° p ka,;,�`?.`k• . . wrote f ,. ,� � �;�.��9 3�F � ,� € :, . , fman.in his :: >k. � ` ' �a ` _ .. to Y" ` f 3 :h;• . . -4; T>;r - i x - y •• Elz ; s ^'»�� l i 4 t o allow the f 1 g .�� 'ice r s ' A• t i r t o f �< ;,, � �• �,' �� �zr �"�'� � Ir0 $,,i' fir "?.;a: `;;, ::1 a r..,�r. 's 95-foot - r `Y r ..., : am, �.-" T. :re s l"�.r kk; s'„yca^2'c sb& ,} a .;. ^Y .., 3a e s,:",'sy'`.'si . ,..,tfi a� ,,F 1,- _ zr" "; "A,*n g - e ♦ ';N'�L "a»°Srt�ts • '.�� �q'4 �fN. ": to ` - ' 'ax x �r C'vu`s. '�: r k x k€ e,�"d,''" r4 .7 ",y� ^�}iis �,' f"�°y$�' �'h.Z& �<�°?xf�w r� ,.�u,w...•ri- e } t �> tx �zTF a+ 1 a �< 4 Paz ,_�� �•'•�# �' ,�� �~ „ sR.� �,.r �' "�� � t �y,,,, ��' +~� t�" ,, � ��� dtobe133 � �k a pliv s �;;z=,, iz ' : y r yJ� u-.x t,+tr, ri� s .••+ zh.: ,� t ', x ,4 ••L >? ..*„a` '� t'e# i' ki evel parking � � � � ��, z �� � , � �>•� ' 4 ,�•r a. a : x�,,g ins AP^.y^!'.f�:a:gz a s Ii a' • 1 s:1. ' . a ham'`'S`r #:.;.N•VV/•q -'�,. '`.,t f�'$ ' ,-s x .." ---'w . , {§ .n�.I.�ty,q., YqA .. `kr .`"c .«w, ��q'.17 <+.w ``� 'rc `''.;; ,F �' Fy.- s the project CI onsideration • eta p;. R t� �Ra3 ?. *> .t ' -' f commended y.wrM>l�.n��;i; :,�:� � r�•F � ' ,( ,.: 4,s; � a� r�•�`_.� <� �-'.''.n�.3.x.�. �..c :' '=''� ' °",. ":-'. ^.9 Y loA ,,,v,4-24 , y �.q•.v er. 2 ` ss.';'4".:t^;.',4j''i;.,14', �:4 i2A several mea I;- iSri'.'.:•;: :• , .a' ,.: :s'•za,,7 a" ,„,• 'ri :sr. t ?•:i,,; v,..w.,tiv >:;,0:::'• . ro ,,.. . ,r...:.r,, i 'r. w. ', �, x:v <:,, I s- , a� ,.y t^' i a ti�;�..: ge problems ,.,,.. �, �,�, 7 �r �` :�, >:< ,: �;:�� �:zm� �-,� � � � � ��' f.� � :.'u ,r 3�+ .'�,"`� r?' ��;a, �`^��^c = ,:>a'i���';�'Lyt'<3�.�.��'�MLSx r£�s� i•r �.� 'v`,� 5+<,.c. B�: 00 car trip �. �, �: =;x�: ,:„,::�a � ,;<. ;��-x:�„' ��" �. .�� ,�•:." fee require_ � � v >v'"` . .,... .' .. ... "?`:.� ... �" .. �: ",�:� ,.,,. s..; , ��. T ^s and partici .. . :.,'.;.•;•-:,... -... -.'.- ..,:1•-:..... .., •, : -7. , - •• .• -. • . . _: .. --. - ..: Valley Dail ,News photo by DUANE HAM:\MURA public trans- Plans for a 10-storrry•building.in1Renton Village were turned down by hearing examiner because.of'G•rady Way f affic. • ,vision, how- • • - Boosters: a traffic should . ,_. t e fees • ai • to effect:<s I ■ . project to'be-f: . : pextra'height ro u i t n n not ust t to the current • o to to Bjr TINA HILDING office tower, he,didn't think that means and shove out other traffic. Mon Village Valley Daily News such problems stand in the way of future `If we're generating traffic because , ,ny was disap-er's RENTON — Downtown supporters downtown development. - it's a residential or shopping or work g examiner' • say the Renton Village office building is One of the keys to the downtowns destination, all these people out trying to n wrote that ideal-for what they'd like to see in and future, he said, is a comprehensive find the Northwest Passage are going to • y around the downtown area, and.they transportation system that will tie go somewhere else to find it." trds for traffic have hopes that it will eventual' draw employment ment areas to the .downtown. • Y P Y Renton' •city staff, who recommended velopment to people to the city center. . . Plans for downtown redevelopment will approval for the Renton Village project, P But, a recent decision by Renton have to include some type of public said they're not sure whether the project usild be doneh on Hearing Examiner Fred Kaufmaii on the transportation from Boeing to down- - sis by the city will have an effect on downtown rode- , an individual project may raise questions about what town, for instance. velopment, but in the long run they say erwise fully effect traffic will play in detdrmining Mel Wilson, Renton transportation the project would be,good for the city.. I how the downtown area redevelops. systems manager, said downtown rede- rote Thomas "That's exactly what we want to see The hearing examiner approved only velopment will only occur if-there is a ,, nton Village a scaled down version of the project, clearly developed transportation plan happening around the downtown, said located off Grady Way, because of traf- for the whole area, including public Jay Covington, dR the .'s mayoral a,ssis ,fear major cor- fic concerns. • transportation options. tant. hd State Route In his decision, Kaufman said that Some current plans for downtown, he ' Covington said the project could pro- elopment, he traffic in the area was already at unac- said, include street improvements to vide employment in the area and could ceptable levels. Main Street as well as corridor improve- invite people into downtown. ad complained "Should additional development that ments from Grady Way to Bronson Way "They (Renton Village Associates) ; block views, will generate more traffic be permitted and from Bronson Way to Houser Way. are upgrading the whole retail complex, also had con when the system is already burdened?"' Taylor said downtown redevelopment and we think that's a real plus," said the property, he asked. ' will inevitably create some traffic, but Don Erickson, Renton's zoning admin- , pany represen- For the Renton Village project,•Kauf- the new traffic would only replace cars istrator. "That can only help the down- , linage plan for man wrote, "it does appear necessary to that are passing through the city. town because it would draw people into but exceeds the strive for a greater reduction in traffic." "Because we don't have very many downtown who would otherwise go Bill Taylor, with the Downtown Ren- active businesses downtown, it becomes elsewhere: gas until March ton Association, said'that despite the• the path of least resistance," said Tay- "Once in downtown, the assumption r _ +_ _. . ,..... t.-.,eg, ,1,--,,,r ,,m-, is that they'll make shopping trips." INTER—OFFICE MEMO TO: ALL INTERESTED PARTIES DATE April 12, 1991 FROM: HEARING EXAM ER RE: RENTON VILLAGE ASSOCIATES SA, CU-078-90 The dates of approval should be corrected to read: MARCH 5, 1991 instead of February as shown. Please change your copies. Thank You! • /I c. k. CITA_ OF RENTON ' Planning/Building/Public Works Department Earl Clymer, Mayor Lynn Guttman,Administrator April 9, 1991 Loren Laskow Renton Village Management Corporation Evergreen Building, Suite #509 15 South Grady Way Renton, Washington 98055 RE: Village Place North (SA 078-90) Dear Mr. Laskow: This letter is written in response to your request for information concerning the"hold harmless"agreement that you are required to provide to address damage to life and/or property which could occur from flooding on the above-referenced project site. Under a policy developed by the Public Works Department and the Environmental Review Committee in 1989, the City requires such an agreement (to be implemented prior to issuance of site preparation/building permits) for each development located in the City's identified flood plain as a precaution against potential flooding damage. Examples of projects required to provide such agreements would include Blume Distribution (SA 112-89), Southgate Plaza (SA 068-90), Rivertech I and Rivertech II (129-89), Alaska Distributors (128-89), GSA/FAA (SA 030-89), East Valley Office Park (SA 118-89), and Sheets Unlimited (SA 039-90). This agreement is necessary so that the City may authorize development in areas where there is a potential for flooding to occur. The document is required as a supplement to the installation of water management systems (such as compensatory storage) because of the dynamic nature of the flood plain. If you would like to have further information, please contact me at 235-2550. Sincerely, 01(2-'t--(-Arn-A-.) 40-4--)`-'—'s&-- J Lenora Blauman Project Manager 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 RENTON VILLAGE MANAGEMENT CORPORATION (206) 228-3000 EVERGREEN BUILDING • SUITE 509 • 15 SOUTH GRADY WAY • RENTON, WASHINGTON 98055 FAX (206)235-8007 PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF RENTON APR -- 5 1991 April 5, 1991 I, Erl. EWE:D Ms. Lenora Beauman City of Renton Dept. of Planning/Building/Public 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 RE: Village Place North ECF; SA, CU, V-078-90 Dear Lenora, A condition of the Declaration of Non-Significance-Mitigated for the above referenced project, we are required to sign a Hold Harmless Agreement addressing storm water and potential flooding. Could you please provide us with the City of Renton policy regarding this requirement and if all other property owners are required to sign this type of agreement prior to the issuance of building permits. Thank you for your assistance regarding this and I look forward to your response. Sincerely re La ko E ec tive V ce President LSL m % CITY ,F RENTON Hearing Examiner Earl Clymer, Mayor Fred J.Kaufman CITY OF RENTON MAR 2 91991 March 29, 1991 RECEIVED CITY CLERK'S OFFICE Thomas A. Goeltz DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE 2600 Century Square 1501 Fourth Avenue Seattle, WA 98101-1688 Re: Request for Reconsideration Renton Village Associates SA, CU-078-90 Dear Mr. Goeltz: Before proceeding with the response to this request for reconsideration, this office would like to reiterate that the addition of this well-designed office building, its accessory garage, and the renovation of the existing shopping center is supported in the main. There were certain particulars that suggested that the height of the office building be reduced to the limits permitted by code and the applicant not be granted a discretionary permit to exceed that limit. The history of the site and its permitting has demonstrated that while flooding has been a recurrent problem each new permit request has indicated that the flooding problem would eventually be addressed. There is no certainty that flooding resolution will occur even with this newest permit. At this juncture it seems appropriate to finally rectify, and not just somewhat limit, an existing serious problem. • This office can see no reason to modify the decision regarding the flooding issue since life-safety appears to be at stake. Since this office is certain the flooding issue will be appealed to the City Council, this office will also leave undisturbed its determination on the Conditional Use Permit. With an appeal almost certain, this office will limit its response to the issues of traffic and the height of the building, other than to reaffirm them as indicated below, and will defer to the Council these particular issues. This response will be framed and numbered according to the applicant's request for reconsideration, although some paragraphs have been combined where issues appeared interrelated. The attachments from the applicant were reviewed by this office but have not been distributed with this response. They are available for review in the Examiner's office. I Drainage/Flooding 1/2. As framed by the request for reconsideration, one would think that no flooding problem exists that needs solution. On Page 3, Line 21 of the request the applicant states: "Though flooding has occurred on nearby Grady Way (caused entirely by off-site runoff), the final design of this project will significantly reduce or eliminate the 100-year flood plain problems on site and for Grady Way." (Emphasis in original). inn aril evPn„P cn„th - Renton_ Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2593 If that is the case, then there should be no objection to the condition which requires that flooding on the site be eliminated. If the 8% additional storage capacity will solve the existing situation, it would be welcomed. If it will not, then there is still no solution to a potentially dangerous situation. Flooding can be dangerous in itself, it could increase the risk of electrocution, and it seriously impairs the passage of emergency vehicles when traffic is backed up because of it. The storm drainage plans submitted by the applicant were conceptual in nature, not definite. Nor did they appear to address the complete impact. Mr. Parsons did not simply approve the plans but suggested further study may be required, particularly of down-stream impacts. While this office does not believe that a complete drainage plan is necessary at this stage, what it did require was that whatever plans evolve should conclusively solve the existing problem. 3/4/5/6. Introducing additional development and additional people on a site prone to severe flooding just does not make sense. It's obvious the city is concerned about this issue or else it would not have required a "Hold Harmless" agreement that specifically mentions the issue of life safety. The applicant mis-read Mr. Parsons response regarding using the first level of the garage for flood storage. It was not completely approved. A number of safety issues were raised which were not explored further in his analysis. Restricting access to the garage during flooding would not prevent people who are already in that area from being surprised by rising flood waters. If that area where to be screened off at any sign of rain, then the parking would be more or less unavailable for code required parking. Somehow retaining flood water in a relatively closed building (the parking garage) as opposed to an open parking lot (code specific reference) is inappropriate. The code seems to distinguish between "parking lot" and "roof ponding" and does not specifically approve the use of an indoor level of a "parking garage." Life safety cannot be dismissed as an issue. Just review the language in the "Hold Harmless Agreement." It is revealing. "1. Acknowledgment of Flood Plain. Renton Village hereby acknowledges that City has informed Renton Village that the property legally described on Exhibit A attached hereto ("Property") is located in an area that may be included in a 100-year flood plain as of the date of this Agreement. Notwithstanding this information, Renton Village has decided to proceed with development of the Property. (Emphasis in original). 2. Hold Harmless. Renton Village hereby releases and agrees to indemnify and hold City harmless from any damage to the Property, or to property, improvements or persons located on the Property, and from any liability, suit, action, judgment or claim arising from any flooding of the Property resulting from conditions of the Property and surrounding area existing as of the date of the Agreement or resulting from Renton Village's work on the Property pursuant to Site Plan No. Cu; SA; V-078- 90 and any building permit(s) related thereto." (Emphasis supplied). This type of agreement is rare. It certainly does not put employees or patrons who work or visit the site on notice that they may be in jeopardy. It seems logical to finally solve a recurring problem before encouraging additional people from coming to this site. 7. The only response to the applicant's statement that such a requirement would result in an unconstitutional taking of a portion of their property for a public purpose, is that it flies in the face of recent decisions of both the United States and Washington State Supreme Courts (See Bituminous Coal -2- Assn, 480 U.S. 470; Presbytery of Seattle v. King County, 114 Wn.2d 320). The Nollan case cited by the applicant responds to an entirely different issue. The applicant already has reasonable use of at least a portion of the subject site. Further, one can only find a "taking" if one grants the applicant's initial premise - that is, that development rights have been denied. That is not what the decision does. Nothing has been taken: No one has suggested that they not develop in this flood zone. The only - relief sought in this case is that the applicant solve any existing flooding problems before potentially jeopardizing additional lives or property. Finally, the applicant indicates that since the site does not cause the flooding it should not have to solve it. Just a simple query: What wetland or flood plain does create its own flooded condition? Is this not the natural result of geologic conditions that appropriate lowlands for flooding when there is storm water runoff from uplands? 8. The applicant suggests that requiring a solution to this problem creates a de facto moratorium. If the imposition of reasonable conditions delays a project then that might be the case. Many conditions are placed on property, and anytime they seem burdensome, or they are not complied with, they could (this office hazards to guess) constitute a moratorium using the applicant's definition. Again, if, as the applicant suggests, the flooding problem is not s.o severe, then it should not be that hard to solve. II Conditional Use Permit A. Traffic-Basis 1/2/3. The denial of what is a discretionary permit, the Conditional Use Permit, cannot be viewed as the imposition of a moratorium. The applicant is not entitled to automatic approval of a conditional use permit. A conditional use permit is discretionary and can be turned down if it has detrimental impacts. So, not only does a taller building have aesthetic impacts (view blockage), but by accommodating more tenants it has definite traffic impacts. If the reduction in building height reduces traffic, where traffic is already bad, then there is one additional reason not to approve a discretionary conditional use permit. 2/3. While the applicant is technically correct when it says the LOS will not be reduced, that is solely because an LOS worse than F has not been defined. Since the definition LOS F translates into "intolerable delays" that definition probably could not be improved upon to indicate an even worse traffic situation. So while the applicant is correct, and the LOS will not get worse than LOS F, that is a technical distinction. City policy does not require ignoring worsening traffic conditions where delays are intolerable. This is restated by the Transpo Group report at page 17 where they state it does not " meet threshold traffic requirements of the city. These various intersections will be LOS F for longer periods, prolonging the rush hour's intolerable traffic and adding to congestion both earlier and later in the day. This office did not intend to second guess some of the traffic estimates. The decision was made in light of the current traffic situation. It was also made in light of the fact that traffic improvements that will accommodate this new traffic remain unfunded or underfunded and unrealized, even in the horizon year. B/C. Comprehensive Plan/View Blockage 1. This office will not argue with the applicant's or staff interpretation of the Comprehensive Plan. It can be read in any number of ways.. Obviously the B-1 zone is quite permissive, permitting any commercial use from one-story, mom and pop groceries to 95 foot tall office buildings in the same .B-1 -3- . . zone. With a conditional use permit, buildings may be even taller. A simple review of the applicant's latest renderings (Attachment 6) shows the substantial difference between an expansive, low-rise shopping center and one developed with tall office buildings. There is no way either the residents on Talbot Hill or the applicant could predict with any certainty what would be permitted on the subject site. Neither the Comprehensive Plan nor the Zoning Code suggest with any specificity where a demarcation between a low-rise shopping center or a high-rise office and commercial district should occur. Both this office and the applicant can find supportive language in the Comprehensive Plan for either position. Generally, land use intensity drops off and building heights fall at the edge of a zoning district. The juxtaposition of I-405 could, or not, modify this general principle. This office partially followed that land use principle and partially ignored it since this office did approve a 95 foot tall building. The existing buildings have already created a height precedent, but it did not seem necessary to extend it further for this building in this location. It did seem to this office that it might be better to encourage more intense development in what had been the city's commercial core. This office did not entirely deny office development. A building that meets the normal height limit of the B-1 zone was approved. The building was scaled back to permit office development, but development that would at the same time preserve some views, potentially distribute traffic a little more evenly, and reduce the bulk of the parking garage. The idea that a taller building would preserve more open space on this campus is belied by the fact that the taller building requires greater parking. To accommodate more parking, the applicant has proposed a very large parking garage. The garage itself is almost as large as some office towers. And again, looking at the applicant's rendering (Attachment 6) the distinction between a six-story or six- level garage is difficult to ascertain. .It may be shorter, but it is not significantly shorter. Therefore, the supposedly reduced footprint of the office tower is more than made up for by the footprint of the parking garage. In conclusion, and in a vein similar to the opening, this office will once again acknowledge that the office building, parking garage, and general renovation will improve this area of the city. It will definitely be a design asset to the city, but under the circumstances outlined above, the original decision will not be modified. It is in light of these circumstances that the decision was issued and conditioned as it was, and it is why the decision remains unmodified by this review. If this office can be of any further assistance, please feel free to write. A right to appeal this determination and the original determination must be exercised no later than 5:00 P.M. on April 12, 1991. Sincerely, FRED J. KA FMAN HEARING EXAMINER FJK/dk cc: All Parties of Record All Parties of Staff -4- / . DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LAW OFFICES 2600 CENTURY SQUARE ' 150I FOURTH AVENUE • SEATTLE,WASHINGTON 98101-1688 (206) 622-3150 THOMAS A. GOELTZ (206) 628-7662 RECEIVE" March 19, 1991 MAR 19 1991 CITY OF s•ENTOf' VIA MESSENGER HEARING EXAMINER Mr. Fred Kaufman Hearing Examiner City of Renton City Hall 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 Dear Mr. Kaufman: Enclosed you will find our Request for Reconsideration for application number SA,CU-078-90. Thank you very much for your reconsideration. Very truly yours, DAVIS WRIGHT TREMA NE Thomas A. Goeltz TAG/ss Enclosure cc: Mr. Michael Sandorffy Mr. Loren S. Laskow Mr. Brian Cloepfil HILLR\00130.LTR Seattle FAX: (206) 628-7040 • TELEX: 328919 DWJ SEA ANCHORAGE, ALASKA ' BELLEVUE,WASHINGTON ' Los ANGELES, CALIFORNIA PORTLAND, OREGON ' RICHLAND,WASHINGTON • WASHINGTON, D.C. • I MAR 19 1991 1 CITY OF RENTON 2 HEARING EXAMINER 3 4 BEFORE THE HEARING EXAMINER FOR THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON 5 6 In re Application of: ) Application No. SA/CU-078-90 7 RENTON VILLAGE ASSOCIATES ) REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION ) 8 Renton Village Associates respectfully requests the Examiner 9 reconsider its March 5, 1991 Report and Decision by deleting 10 Conditions 2 and 5 (drainage/flooding) and 4 and 6 (building 11 height) of the Site Plan Approval, and ap proving the Conditional 12 Use Permit (re height) . This request for reconsideration is 13 based upon the errors of law, fact and judgment set forth herein. 14 I. DRAINAGE/FLOODING SITE PLAN CONDITIONS: 15 No. 2. In order to protect the public health, safety and welfare, no additional development of this site shall occur until the 16 current flooding problem is resolved. The applicant shall have to solve the flooding, whether it is by individual action or by 17 concerted action that involves an LID or other method, prior to issuance of any building permit. 18 No. 5. The lower level of the garage shall not be used for compensating flood storage as it will unduly jeopardize the public health, safety and 19 welfare of the general public. 20 BASIS FOR RECONSIDERATION 21 1. The Drainage Plan Not Only Meets, But Exceeds the Renton Code. 22 The applicant's drainage plan exceeds the detention 23 requirements of the City's new Surface and Storm Water Management 24 Ordinance. That drainage plan has three major elements for 25 REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION - 1 GOELT\00776.PLD Seattle DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LAW OFFICES 2600 CENTURY SQUARE•150I FOURTH AVENUE SEATTLE,WASHINGTON 9810I.1688 (206)622-3150 1 detention and flood control: (a) subsurface drains below several 2 streets (underground FSC) ; (b) maximum 6" deep storage on part of 3 the ground level of garage; and (c) installation of minimum 72" 4 drainage pipe to replace existing 48" pipe. See ORB Org. 5 Drawing. These three elements not only exceed Renton's code for 6 this project, but also substantially relieve pre-existing 7 flooding. 8 The drainage plan expressly and fully meets the ERC drainage 9 conditions. The Plan was approved as required by Randall Parsons 10 of the City's Storm Water Utility Division, who stated: 11 We have completed our review of the conceptual drainage plan submitted to us at a 12 meeting last Tuesday, January 15, 1991 by The ORB Organization on behalf of the developer 13 and have approved it with the following conditions [setting forth conditions which 14 the applicant has or will meet] . (City Memorandum, Attachment 1, emphasis added. ) 15 In fact, the first two elements (described above) of the 16 drainage plan provide detention facilities which exceed Renton's 17 new surface water management requirements. Specifically, the 18 detention provided is 108% of the capacity required under the new 19 code. See ORB Org. Drawing. 20 2. Applicant Improves Preexisting Flooding Conditions. 21 The Examiner states in a number of findings and conclusions 22 that the drainage plan "does nothing about the existing 23 [flooding] situation" (Conclusion 14, p. 8) . See also findings 24 regarding "no modification of current flooding," the current 25 REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION - 2 GOELT\00776.PLD Seattle DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE Lnw OFE10ES z600 CENTURY SQUARE•x5ox FOURTH AVENUE SEATTLE,WASHINGTON 98xox-x688 (zo6)6223x5o 1 level of flooding "would not be modified," and the current 2 conditions "would not be alleviated and the inundation that has 3 occurred in the past would be expected to continue." Findings 4 33, 34, p. 6. These findings and conclusions are in error and 5 provide further support for eliminating the Examiner's Conditions 6 2 and 5. 7 The applicant's proposed drainage system, in fact, will 8 significantly improve pre-project drainage and reduce preexisting 9 flooding on the site. Consequently, this project will not only 10 take care of its own drainage requirements, but will also 11 substantially reduce flooding which currently occurs on the site. 12 This net improvement of drainage results from the third 13 element of the applicant's drainage plan, i.e. , replacement of an 14 existing 48" pipe with at least a 72" pipe. Currently, there is 15 a 72" pipe which discharges into a 48" pipe just southeast, of the 16 Ernst store. During current heavy runoff and storms, this 17 downsizing results in overflow and a flooding backup into the 18 retail parking area. The replacement of the 48" with a minimum 19 72" facility will significantly improve existing flooding and 20 drainage. 21 Though flooding has occurred on nearby Grady Way (caused 22 entirely by off-site runoff) , the final design of this project 23 will significantly reduce or eliminate the 100-year flood plain 24 problems both on site and for Grady Way. 25 REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION - 3 GOELT\00776.PLD Seattle DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LAW OFFICES z600 CENFURY SQUARE•150x FOURTH AVENUE SEATTLE,WASWNOTON 98xoaz688 (2o6)622-315o 1 3. Garage Water Detention Presents No Health or 2 Safety Risk. 3 The entire parking garage is at-grade and will be built on 4 pilings. The only reason compensating storage will occur is due 5 to the intended design of the first level floor to "dish" the 6 slab inward to hold a maximum of 6" of water, rather than a 7 conventional slab design to cone and drain the water outward. 8 Consequently, there is no risk of personal injury or a threat to public safety from a maximum of 6" of water, which has 9 been specifically designed and approved by all appropriate city 10 departments. Both the police and fire departments reviewed and 11 approved the project plans, and those agencies are expressly 12 13 charged with protecting and promoting the public health and safety. Likewise, the stormwater utility division, long-range 14 planning office and every other reviewing agency in the City 15 approved the project without any reference to flooding as 16 creating a public health or safety hazard from a 6" deep 17 detention facility. 18 19 The record does not support the Examiner's conclusion that 20 "the lower level of the public garage re-introduces the potential for injury." Conclusion 30, p. 10. First, the "lower level" is 21 in fact the ground level and is no different than any other 22 surface detention. Second, the applicant is unaware of any 23 injury on the Renton Village site from flooding and no evidence 24 was introduced in the record of such injury. As mentioned, both 25 REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION - 4 GOELT\00776.PLD Seattle DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LAW OFFICES 2600 CENTURY SQUARE•1501 FOURTH AVENUE SEATTLE,WAsmN NON 98101.1688 (2o6)6223150 • 1 the fire and police departments reviewed the project and made no 2 mention whatever of health or safety concerns due to flooding. 3 While inconvenient, the intentional flooding of up to 6" in 4 the parking garage is no more, and probably less, of a factor 5 than typical flooding in streets and parking lots that occurs 6 throughout many parts of the City during flood conditions. Cars 7 clearly can drive through 6" of water if required. The garage 8 capacity allows all but 49 of the stalls required for the office 9 building to park on above-grade levels (see memorandum 10 Attachment 2) . Consequently, even if the ground level of the 11 garage were functioning with its 6" deep retainage, no one is 12 trapped or prevented from parking above the first ground level. 13 4. No Garage Access Location Will be Flooded. 14 The significant elimination or reduction of existing 15 flooding problems is an integral part of the scope of this 16 project. The proposed garage has three ingress and egress points, 17 none of which is subject to flooding. These access points 18 directly connect to access routes which do not experience 19 flooding, allowing access to and from the overall site via South 20 Renton Village Place. As mentioned above, the project design 21 will significantly handle pre-existing flooding on site and on 22 Grady Way. Consequently, there is direct parking and access to 23 and from the project, even during flood conditions, which will be 24 safe and with no standing water. 25 REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION - 5 GOELT\00776.PLD Seattle DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LAW OFFICES 2600 CENTURY SQUARE•1501 FOURTH AVENUE SEATTLE,WASHINGTON 98101-1688 (206)622-3150 1 5. The Garage Compensating Storage Is Expressly Approved 2 and Allowed by Code. 3 The ground level storage was specifically approved by the 4 City's Surface Water Division (see report from R. Parsons) . In 5 fact, Renton's code would allow 12", rather than the 6" proposed 6 for this project. See Attachment 3 from drainage manual. The Code also would allow the entire ground level to be used for 7 storage, whereas the proposal is only to use two-thirds of the 8 ground level. 9 6. Flooding Is Manageable and of Short Duration. 10 The flooding which currently occurs on-site, and which will 11 not be exacerbated (but in fact will be significantly 12 reduced/eliminated) with the project, is not desireable, but has 13 been and will continue to be manageable. It is typical of flood 14 management which is required throughout other areas of the City. 15 The Renton Village site itself drains within four to six hours, 16 even during heavy flooding. The four existing office buildings, 17 hotel, retail center and cinema, all have functioned in the past 18 despite flooding with no threat to health or safety, although an 19 inconvenience. 20 21 There is no reason why the proposed project will not function at least as well, and in fact will function better, 22 because of the design of the garage and access routes to streets 23 24 which do not flood. As with the existing buildings, signage and traffic control can avoid flooded areas. This project has been 25 REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION - 6 GOELT\00776.PLD Seattle DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LAW OFFICES 2600 CENTURY SQUARE•1501 FOURTH AVENUE SEATTLE,WASHINGTON 9810r1688 (2o6)622g15o 1 singled out, as has no other project in the City of Renton, to 2 prohibit issuance of a building permit even though it exceeds the 3 Renton drainage code by taking care of its own drainage while 4 also substantiallyimproving p g the preexisting situation. 5 7. Illegally Appropriated Private Land for Public 6 Flood Storage. 7 The effect of the Examiner's Condition 2 is to illegally 8 appropriate the applicant's private property for public flood 9 detention purposes. This public flood storage is for preexisting 10 flooding which is not in any way caused or exacerbated by this 11 project. In fact, this project is neutral on flooding by clearly 12 compensating for any flood storage displacement which occurs 13 (i.e. , 108% of capacity as provided) . Further, by replacing the 14 48-inch line with a 72-inch line, it makes substantial 15 improvements for preexisting flooding for which this application 16 bears no legal responsibility. 17 Condition 2/s prohibition on development until the current 18 (i.e. , non-project related) flooding is solved is an error at law 19 and in equity. It constitutes a moratorium without any ordinance 20 or other express City Council authorization. There is no 21 rational nexus under the state and federal constitutions for 22 imposing conditions or extracting public benefits (i.e. , public 23 flood storage) , where the project does not contribute to any 24 flooding. Condition 2 is without due process and without 25 compensation and is therefore unconstitutional. See e.g. , Nollan REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION - 7 GOELT\00776.PLD Seattle DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LAW OFFICES 2600 CENTURY SQUARE•1501 FOURTH AVENUE SEATTLE•WASHINGTON 9810I.1688 (zo6)6zz315o 1 v. California Coastal Commission, 483 U.S. 825, 107 S.Ct. 3141, 2 97 L.Ed.2d 677 (1987) . 3 The unconstitutional appropriation of the Renton Village 4 site for public flood detention is based on the fact that 5 approximately 80-90% (based upon studies conducted by the Federal 6 Emergency Management Agency, the Washington State Department of 7 Transportation, and the City of Renton) of the flooding that 8 occurs on the Renton Village site is generated off-site. Thus, 9 the pre-existing flooding in no way is attributable either to 10 this project or the other buildings currently occupying the 11 Renton Village Shopping Center. 12 This off-site runoff comes off Talbot Hill, across Talbot 13 Road from the Puget Sound Power & Light Facility, or from the 14 Metro's Park and Ride across Grady Way. The Examiner's Condition 15 2 requiring the applicant to solve the flooding problem, either 16 alone or through some other mechanism, is unreasonable and 17 improper. As noted earlier, flood control is an integral part of 18 the scope of this project, and the result will be no increase and 19 a likely decrease in flooding. However, the source of the 20 current flooding is off the applicant's site, and the complete 21 solution is beyond the applicant's control. 22 It is illegal to appropriate public detention without public 23 payment. See e.q. , Nollan, supra; Just v. Marinette County, 56 24 Wis.2d 7, 201 N.W.2d 761 (1972) (preventing owner from using 25 floodplain property deemed an unconstitutional taking) ; Ackerman REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION - 8 GOELT\00776.PLD Seattle DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LAW OFFICES 2600 CENTURY SQUARE•150I FOURTH AVENUE SEATTLE,WASHINGTON 9810I.1688 (zo6)6221150 1 v. Port of Seattle, 55 Wn..2d 400, 348 P.2d 664 (1960) (flight 2 path over property deemed unconstitutional taking of an easement 3 which required compensation) . 4 Not only is the site being used to store the general 5 public's flood waters, but the public is in fact in control of 6 the outflow from the property. Public actions themselves are 7 preventing drainage from the site. Specifically, flooding on the 8 Renton Village site is directly controlled by public agencies' 9 constriction of the outflow gate under Highway 405. 10 8. The Examiner's Conditions Constitute an Improper Moratorium. 11 Finally, the Examiner's Condition 2 amounts to a development 12 moratorium until some publicly—funded or sponsored area—wide 13 flood control measure is instituted. That constitutes a 14 moratorium, which in order to be valid must be for a reasonable 15 period of time with evidence that the public agency imposing the 16 moratorium has taken reasonable steps to solve the condition. 17 Here, none of those conditions are met. See Washington Market 18 Ent. , Inc. v. City of Trenton, 68 N.J. 107, 343 A.2d 408 (1975) ; 19 Cai ture Realty Corp. v. Board of Adjustment, 126 N.J. Super. 20 200, 313 A.2d 624 (1973) , aff'd. , 133 N.J. Super. 216, 336 A.2d. 21 30 (1975) . 22 II. HEIGHT REDUCTION CONDITIONS AND CUP DENIAL. 23 No. 4. The building shall not exceed 95 feet in height. 24 25 REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION - 9 GOELT\00776.PLD Seattle DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LAW OFFICES 2600 CENTURY SQUARE'150I FOURTH AVENUE SEATTLE,WASHINGTON 9810:•1688 (zo6)622g150 1 No. 6. The shall be reduced in size to garage provide a reduction in parking stalls in proportion to the reduction in office 2 building size. 3 CUP. The Conditional Use Permit is denied. 4 A. TRAFFIC-BASIS FOR RECONSIDERATION. 5 1. All ERC Conditions Have Been Fully Met. 6 The applicant is required to make specific roadway and access improvements, as well as contribute substantial funds, as 7 part of complying with the ERC conditions. The City of Renton 8 has not proposed, much less imposed a moratorium, either on the 9 Grady Way corridor or more generally at some Level of Service 10 threshold. However, the Examiner's conditions reducing height 11 effectively have imposed a moratorium upon traffic at some 12 unspecified level. Any curtailing of development to reduce 13 traffic impacts should be done on an area—wide, ordinance basis 14 , by the City Council, and not through an individual permit 15 decision that otherwise fully meets the City's code and the SEPA 16 conditions imposed by the ERC. 17 2. The Applicant Has Met the Adopted SEPA 18 Policies for Traffic. 19 The State and City SEPA requirements specifically require 20 that any mitigation, such as height reduction to reduce traffic, 21 be based upon adopted, written policies in effect at the time of 22 the decision which are specifically cited by the decisionmaker. 23 WAC 197-11-660; RMC 4-6-22 . Here, the applicant is unaware of 24 any SEPA policy which would authorize the reduction of building 25 REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION - 10 GOELT\00776.PLD Seattle DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LAW OFFICES z600 CENTURY SQUARE•1501 FOURTH AVENUE SEATTLE,WASHINGTON 98I01.1688 (zo6)622g15o 1 height for traffic mitigation, and the Examiner has not cited any 2 in its decision. 3 The applicant prepared a complete traffic impact and 4 mitigation study by The Transpo Group. That study was done to 5 comply with the City's adopted SEPA and traffic policies. The 6 study provides in part: 7 City of Renton Standards 8 The City of Renton policy for traffic mitigation is set forth in a memo that is 9 distributed by the Traffic Division. For intersections, the policy states: 10 "The developer is expected to maintain with 11 their development the same level of service that would be anticipated in the horizon year 12 if the site were not developed. (Unless the horizon year level of service is at C or 13 above) ." 14 Transpo Report (excerpt of p. 17) , Attachment 4. The Transpo 15 study goes on to state at page 19: "Per the City's guidelines, 16 no intersection-specific mitigation is required [for the proposed 17 project] . However, the project will be preparing a TMP with the 18 City of Renton." 19 Further, the project makes a substantial financing 20 contribution to the Grady Way TBD to additional traffic analysis 21 and makes site-specific physical improvements for transportation. 22 The report further notes that: 23 The nature of traffic generated by office projects lends them to successful 24 transportation management plans (TMPs) . Currently, three office buildings in the 25 Renton Village campus are occupied by Boeing, REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION - 11 GOELT\00776.PLD Seattle DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LAW OFFICES 2600 CENTURY SQUARE•150I FOURTH AVENUE SEATTLE,WASHINGTON 9810I-1688 (2o6)622.3150 1 One Renton Place, Two Renton Place and Three 2 Renton Place. Successful TMPs are operated at these offices which consistently result in 3 the 15% ride share. Since Boeing will occupy the Village Place North building, it is 4 suggested that a similar TMP be developed for the office portion of the project. 5 See Attachment 4. Such a TMP was imposed by the ERC and will be 6 fully implemented by the applicant. 7 Consequently, the City's adopted SEPA or other 8 transportation policies have been fully met since the Level of 9 Service at the various intersections will not be reduced as a 10 result of this project. The project adds only 4% to the peak 11 hour traffic, which cannot justify a three-story reduction in 12 building height. 13 3. The Level of Service Is the Same With or Without the Project. 14 The applicant's traffic study, as well as the City's 15 analysis, confirm the Level of Service of the intersections 16 affected by the project will have the same level of service with 17 or without the project. Consequently, without a change in level 18 19 of service, the reduction of the building height to achieve a 20 reduction in traffic volume is in error and contrary to law. 21 In its traffic analysis for the project, the Transpo Group summarized, "We have found that the Grady Way TBD study accounts 22 for the planned build-out of the Village Place North site 23 24 • • • •" Consequently, the applicant's contribution is 25 consistent with and partially implements the City's establishment REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION - 12 GOELT\00776.PLD Seattle DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LAW OFFICES 2600 CENTURY SQUARE•1501 FOURTH AVENUE SEAITLE,WASHINGTON 98101.1688 (2o6)622 y50 1 of the TBD. The City did not choose a partial moratorium or 2 place any traffic capacity limits on Grady Way independent of the 3 TBD. Yet, the Examiner's height conditions do so by denying the 4 CUP and reducing the building height to 95 feet. 5 B. Comprehensive Plan/Compatible Surroundings. 6 1. The Renton Village Site Is Better than Downtown for Ten-Story Building. 7 To the extent the building height reduction was based upon 8 the CUP criteria regarding the Comprehensive Plan and 9 compatibility with surrounding properties, this site, rather than 10 downtown, is clearly preferred for a ten-story office building. 11 There currently are no downtown buildings over three stories, 12 except for the mid-rise height of City Hall. The existing 13 streets in downtown are narrow and not expandable. Consequently, 14 the traffic generated by the project would not be handled by 15 existing roads, which in turn are much further from the major 16 highway corridors of I-405 and SR 167. 17 The staff found that the 10-story height is compatible with 18 the nearby buildings, including the office buildings and the 19 Holiday Inn. Staff further concluded "The proposed location 20 provides sufficient separation from other structures on the site 21 to allow air and light circulation on the site, to offer 22 attractive view corridors and to ensure adequate 23 privacy/defensible space." Staff Report, p. 8, ¶ C(3) . 24 25 REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION - 13 GOELT\00776.PLD Seattle DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LAW OFFICES 2600 CENTURY SQUARE'1501 FOURTH AVENUE SEATTLE,WASHINGTON 98101-168S (206)622-3150 1 Further, this site presents a clear separation of the 2 commercial areas from residential areas with its road network, 3 greenbelts and topographic changes. Finally, it is doubtful that 4 a ten-story building could be approved downtown due to the 5 proximity to the airport and required FAA approval (which in fact 6 was necessary and obtained for this site) . 7 2. A Ten-Story Building Is Compatible With Existing Development. 8 Unlike downtown, the Renton Village site currently has a 9 strong office building character. Although somewhat higher than 10 the existing office buildings on the Renton Village site, this 11 variation clearly is in scale and supported by existing building 12 height as well as power poles (see Attachment 5 showing sea level 13 elevations; with the various site gradations the proposed 14 building is actually only 24 feet higher than Three Renton 15 Place) . 16 C. View Blockage. 17 1. View Blockage Is Not a Legal Basis for 18 Height Reduction. 19 As recognized by the Examiner, the City Code and SEPA 20 policies simply do not address view blockage, nor do any adopted 21 SEPA policies. The Examiner has correctly concluded that "as 22 long as the problems of glare and reflection are adequately 23 addressed, the question of view cannot otherwise be weighed in 24 this analysis." 25 REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION - 14 GOELT\00776.PLD Seattle DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LAW OFFICES 2600 CENTURY SQUARE.150I FOURTH AVENUE SEATTLE,WASHINGTON 98101.1688 (zo6)6zzg15o 1 As required by Condition 9, which is fully acceptable to the 2 applicant, light and glare will be addressed. The applicant 3 acknowledges the building will impact views of some residences 4 that are located approximately 1,200 feet from the project. 5 However, though the Examiner recognized some views would be 6 blocked, he noted that "these impacts are to be expected." 7 (Conclusion 26, p. 10) . The building is clearly compatible and 8 in scale with the surrounding buildings, which include four 9 office buildings with a height of approximately 107 feet (to the 10 top of the elevator penthouse) . See Attachment 6. 11 2. The Parking Garage Is Six Levels, Not Stories. 12 To the extent the Examiner was concerned about the height of 13 the garage and any view blockage, it is important to clarify that 14 the garage is five "levels," not five "stories." While generally 15 referring to the garage as six "levels," the Examiner 16 specifically equated the six-story existing office buildings with 17 a six "story" parking structure. Paragraph 37, p.11. The parking 18 garage is 54 feet, which would equate to four "stories" as 19 normally used for an office building. 20 CONCLUSION 21 Based upon the foregoing, the applicant requests the 22 Examiner reconsider its decision and approve the Conditional Use 23 Permit for a 10-story office building and eliminate Conditions 2, 24 4, 5 and 6 from the Site Plan approval. [Note: Attachments 5 25 and 6 are illustrations prepared by Mr. Cloepfil, one of REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION - 15 GOELT\00776.PLD Seattle DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LAW OFFICES 2600 CENTURY SQUARE•150I FOURTH AVENUE SEATTLE,WASHINGTON 98101.168S (zo6)6221150 1 applicant's witnesses, of sea level elevations and view corridors 2 from Talbot Hill based on public record information and/or 3 hearing testimony by the applicant or other witnesses. These 4 illustrations are not currently part of the record submittals. 5 They are submitted with this reconsideration request in response 6 to the conclusions contained in the Examiner's report. ] 7 RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, this 19th day of March, 1991. 8 DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE 9 Attorneys for Renton Vi age Associates 10 11 By Thomas . oeltz 12 WSBA #05157 13 �- 14Z By Robert L. Hill 14 WSBA #19928 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION - 16 GOELT\00776.PLD Seattle DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LAW OFFICES 2600 CENTURY SQUARE'150I FOURTH AVENUE SEATTLE,WASHINGTON 98I01.1688 (206)6221150 LIST OF ATTACHMENTS 1. Memorandum from Randall Parsons approving the conceptual drainage plan. 2. Parking calculations from August 8, 1990. 3. Excerpt from the King County Surface Water Design Manual. 4. Excerpt from the Traffic Impact Analysis. 5. Diagram showing elevations measured from mean sea level. 6. Photographic reproduction of area with proposed buildings superimposed. 1,\Jselk, • 'cev n1:1\ 1°� -3 MAR , .��'� ,:tok Gcri.oeouh HILLR\00129.OTR/3.19.91 Seattle t nrq+ -J11:11 L _ 1,T9 tit CI"'; ki:NYCsIN • r. ....... .....r-«cr+--r.......,.w...<..u.rr•..«r89wA.s.wu.. 4j�1�., • • • • • - ` elh •as i{a Lot-, •• 1. 4 • tips IM Yk. a '•� y., • • • a 7, ,- -: • 1,•'j i:T :E. . tag(1iS::+ems; ,•11. W •. ^iti :i 1I:,.A. ..,)OF'::t A w 03/15/9 10:08 206 235 800" - 003 —is—'9i 09:0 . =1: CITY OF Rrror+ TEL NO: r.'5-4513 .'J'4 ' ►• • Don Erickson Village Place North Page 2 possibly reduce the floodplain on the site and ellasinate the need for all or a portion of the compensatory storage proposed and warrant's analysis. At a minimum this pipe could be partially extended as a new conveyance system hydraulically connected to the compensatory etora$e areal to provide controlled inundation and recession of flood waters rather than the uncontrolled waves of surface flows that will currently pass acrou the psrkiag areas. (3) Biotiltratlon facilities are required for all new impervious surfaces in excess of 2,000 square feet that will be subject to vehicular use or storage of chemicals per Core Requirement *3. This would include areas that are currently gravel or compacted spy areas that al nd are thesepro serffaci to be paved. ft appears that there may not b (4) Any off-site work in the downetretua wetland areas such at improvements for water quantity or quality control should be considered as a separate project with, therefore, a separate SEPA process. We assume you will coordinate the applicant's receipt of this information. If you have any questions regarding these qualifications, please nail me at extension 554$. it-oso:ttLP►p. CC: Lenora Dteuew Gress Zii.mernin Ron Straps Enclosure . • . • • . aa41.4., , ,- --._ - --__ ' .....,..............._ ,................._ .4mm....Freer. 2 ACCIPXMV•21111C.MortrebilCC. IMICalLOI OrIllr.... 1 1 1 II • „. tea I ;::-, '• —- --- - 'atiON &Irk! storm 111" 11 i 71 _ _ INNINO ........ _ ,4040.61 410 . ., demlIMINIMIL . IP 'WWI&VG . P•i•P ,.... _,.: ;....., '• . . Zi sP " I [ . ..,. , •• • . lik j i • larn* I , 1, - ti -......, .... ile f I ..,.. I hit . I . 4 if. t- tt. . 11 5... .... •: . ,.. • II *, . ' .1 ..... 1 1.• sot,. ..-41. !.• if 1. •Ii : ••NI 1 Wel ba . II ,. . • 1 I i 1 . ___ . . . .. _....,,...... :..i. . ... i r. .. ,... 4 A., --.... . ,; . b101 b 01115•. 1 ii.• ...R...., .... 0 e' , '‘ . :2.:',:t. t ..", . .... il i 1 It I., • y :. .' LIT› ... --. ,.., ..; ,Is. . ; , ...., .3 i 03 .. ....,, 1 ,, P:',: : : ' I . lk ,. . 0 . ,...••••., ..............._.. _ iS • . 1 I • I 1, . - • 1.---) ••• , - , :4-4 ', 0 ztt. • 4.---", .., ., ,t. i i,1 • . . I.. :Se . i - • ..4.1"•sh• • - • , ..., ....,... ,,„.‘,... , . .• • X •-- `••••14-1.-._„/ 1..',' - • ...... s '• • • r - i I 1 . r 1 . I •.+-?••• - t• . . . . ....., ,. d._..P.. •! ...I. , • - •''', t„.. ..."14 r.-- 1 • .• . . J! 4 1... . • 1 It ' % ii 1 f r ( 1 . i t. i 1 gl . --•-....... • ..: ! i • i" .1 I/ ...'ft- --- ,... jt I ' ; 'A. •"t"1 :::, ' . . '. ....4 I ...., .. r P. •, i i ..-...--.,. r 1 J.•I ', . I . :I I -....... ...-..- ok 1 ••••; •••. e-••.•di 1 ,, I/ v. • ... •.•.• ..',.......... • I 4'• -- t. ..—..,--1 , - ___ •.• , • , i i • •II ' . 4 t i 1 ff. 4 All. : , 4 i , i ie, ) ' • .. 10... .• '4IF.eili''''\:,‘ • ..; A \ . 4' .. . \,. S. ."...s.......... ; / • ifs• •. • i %.... ........ ., '''''..•;/ 2 I t 1 '.' • ... i . 111 MOD '"•-......, - • .,47," i I 1r s ! ..0- -..., -.. ., ._. 1 . • N.,1 '... 0 .0..-- • r 1 k 1 . '4,' , . ...x._ \ --4r •: .i . . \ ,.0. .,. • i i . • •: . .00/). N i . ...— li ,... t I :41, ',:`,N\\*:;.\.,...‘ :,.. .. , t• 0 '', '. , 4.40.- • 1.>" 00.° -,—. , .-... ,.. 1 i I . !', . ji,/ f r • ---zz--,-:7r-.:,' "1 I 1 r/'•f 1 I , ,,,:li.,01...,,• , ....•1 . .. ...".1747t." :--• -•••-•-:-.:-,--.--• i :. ' •II 1111111 ,4r r iti ,...,00111P1\A v.e.N‘ ._.•- ' , I' ..... v i .., -%A.\\\ 0 .. . .-''t 1 1 • it! • kaki-4'"frit,.,...'.c. : ::..,„" I f '' 17 inkA 1) • ,0,. t i I - I'. 1. -1 I i 1 ! t i! i • L.."• 4-t ,...,..., ; •i,e t • -.• ,-. -;*7 i .: , ,t . . • , / i i '-s-11... ; - .-,1.• , • • / . ! . / i..,; , . • . ;1 . . i.-.a•- g..., 0. if i s, .7-,• •... • •-'......' ..i :' : i i f il , •. , :: ' • • ,• I .i t • I / t ,,I i; 1 i Z 1 I I 111. - : I r - 4r,, "a/ ! • ,-, i .:n. ,, .i to . ..• • 1."'"•••,,,...... l . '--S I ... .,, es.4 i WI •• 1. . *mg., ) 1.4 I •. u. •... :• . ei, f . 1 . .' ''''... .. IV j ..1,,, ,e • I _ 1..,..........,....,_.,.._,.,......-,"' „ ' ••• . .. i .. er • .. tyr:..r... v.:.•---i•.---•" .77••••\:" e. 144spitv , ...:_„,. ....... .....__ • ...;........,,ir., •..., . ..._ Si. •••4 N 41 ellIIMINIM.P.IM, 'VIM& '•- BEI i 1 ERIME • 1 i 1 I II • . . 1700 2,008 S2Z 90Z '60:0T .,:.6/ST/20 03/15/9!!--- - 10:09 206 235 8007 005 t MAR-15-'91 it15;lia4 '''i:-: CITY CF RENTON TEL NO: 7. .,27=-2513 it 54.3 P015 --•••' . '111111111i WiSliEE • I 6 -•• ,Or ......'''.. /I%..11, "1- •i• -• •. 4 IN ilk\, I,•"'• pm..., le /0' •:\:;irti 4.....,,,:40.,. "... •' ,rn -----..-4. :...• •*, ......... .......•,.r.... .. • - I , ... . ,, .,•,;;,, . lir ., • ..,*rtzzil , c 4 . : i .:;',;.-.7..7.-........,..... .--..-,. .1 ..-, ,..,1 i . . VIM Is (1. ....•- .. . . • .. , ...... , . _____- - in - . , .... ;,... i ,,,......... • I . /; ; ...•-'''' . 1 f r • ,.,.. ''''I' - - . A r 1 • _ I ; f i: , A i / OVI ; , ... .7i .0: 11 ' i 1 i &t .1 . ' i /I.. i 11 1:5 1 ? . , 1 1,.... ' I . d o .' 12 i Cl? : I#e . r.! %... -•111-...1' - I; k: ,1 L.1 ; a 1 1, II .. . '.! , i..!,2 i. •, -:.-; , ; I 1 i i ! ; , • . ... -..... , r 4„( , . , , .7 . •,.. i, I 1 e i • . • : !I ' • ' / .. ' i ' i! .0: ! i S il . ; . - '; • .; ' .414‘:•.... 1 1 c...• .i..,,,,, \s\l",,,-1,A:.-7.41111 irt: tifitit,I _,,,? • 1.." fz-z-z•-:::;•-,...'44;::...- , . ,•''' vs,.'1. Nike#11°P.- lv . 171 .f,„ ' , vh. i: •-- • 0 Lel‘\.:\''',,3- iiiiit /1/44.4.... , t i i.,, i,, '-; .1'-.----1-- Z:4,•1 . ' • :f ......, ....--..;..".17••!... .‘ • ••• ,.......n.".......°. .. . • Li I!"r"'- ... • ... • • • ' - . • 1 '4. • .: • ...a. ,.; . ' ' 1 i, ....ff e\s'' • / • 1 F I .. I •••. r.•1 fte. •• • .. . •1. .• . • '-'• 1, ',' • t . ,...„.... . , ....1 •. ., 1 .'', .1., r- - A 6".. • • it • • I -• 0 o .•.• :,., ..- ... ,---.."-----. • i .. :• • . ..... .••..., • .) ' - ' V•1 •-•4 . . .. . -•• i : „ '••••47,44.... .;-: ye 'az-...,:.•..,, ' •.0 . ' / : . .1 . ,Nr..1\1\ , .. , . ., - •• t I i : o.1 ' '`.- ' We • . A. .. : . •..„ . 1 ..1; •' I'! / ' iv o i I'. • , • ,,. I ! 0 .- - . . , . i p.•: . . . 'i: /...",•r;,/r,7 f , . ._ 1. O.# m • 1. •. 1 ; •4:- - . - t•te. e. / •... - 1 : 1- ; - , - 44111111% • ,I,•i', . % • ; • '. . . ! ; .2.7---, 7 • 0...0* 1 - • , •••• ' . . . _, Nli , . -......,•• • • .. h ... i , - fol .... ,_ i 1-- - . . .„, , • 0 i -- •• / " "4"":"!'r. •••. . 7,........... .?.. I i 1• •• 1...... It!4 '-- _ •/.. I f , !.> ...'''''''' 'II 1 i i pm ::-..v.. 4,' , . i r ',. . . --„,........ I : I/ . 1....,1 pa... ....t i 1 ;•I' , 1 %/k./ • ./.•- A. ., .. f (# "':.• 5:6:::' ,....Z.X1' ." .4% •:. , '; r17:741i i . .... -..,14.......... ! 1;7... • .0 2 . , ............r., .4 • ; • , : VP.".. .. '" : , ; • tit. • •r 1/4s'7,../ i„„...-:: . , ....VW. 6 . 1 e--.. t'''' <4... 11.':. • • • CC1°.• . ' ,, ,1 1 ‘s, ,... ...., '''.•••• f1.-. ,...)/ . t• .." , • . i : :•••' '4 . . • ..., , • 4. II. ........... ; . ... 4 • ar.V I III i III "47......°0' . ..r..f.7_-: ,,. I..; .. .,.. ....,,,_ ..t. .. I lige isil ---• 4 4. .... i ,• ii, ................... .. .t. I 11 I 11 : • :. i .. .. , .; t ,• -, 1.••• r" ir • . .8. •1.. 4 t-- • ' „. -7 • -I, '''....... p at, ...1 ? f ' i V ,". -1-'41 4. . .2 I I 5 1 . . i I 1 li .44-.1 ...,., . . • i. , 4 •.. • • ... 01181:441 0 011Psm, SZ , 4. , %)1, •. . . . . %I. .....I ' • .,.. . -.IA 0 • I 11/ 1 I .. I A , 111 . " ''....„ ••••• • . ..''. ..; . - . • .4 ' 'Lkii.,4.. --mimpwrinsmom """ 1,-•• -11,. -ilmiii110:-.2-" *. • r4 .... III ili•in 1 v...... PLACE NORTH . ---01Miliffillillillt:.-:-= . - -- • -. 1 i I "--...wwlem-CINE.326 4c,ReCiluo-mmill•AzirsCrit -,:-- --P*Iii.1111C_AIIIIIIL -- --.• eNa me..di 6.5...ma=moulf.i...1 NMI ON WY ..f... ..--- ..,..-. ..._ ..- -...1.--1 .001.1.1111010110 ....1.001.M.I.M11100110.. owilliPro.111 03/15/91 08:52 -. DWT SEATTLE fj002 • August 8,1990 • • Calli5on • Village Place North• Architecture Area and Parking Calculations • Programming Planning Interior Design Graphics 1. AREA OF BUILDING Bldng.Grow Off. Gross Net Office* Cora Ret. Gross Eft. Floor 10 28,171 23,171 25,339 2,832 89.9% Floors 2-9 (8)30,219 (8)30.219 (8)27,387 18)2.832 90.6% Roar 1 35360 20,214 15,928 4.2E15 15,144 78.5% Total 305,233 293,137 260,30.3 29.74 : 15,144 89.7% 2. PARKING A. Office • 1302 cars Scars 260,363 net sf" = 1000 net se (or gross leasable) REQUIRED: PROVIDED: 1302 cars 1302 cars ('ii Os( ��,1441 r 521 compacts(max.) 359 compacts • -(, B. Retail • 15,144 new building 11,100 new infill 4,100 Schumsky's • 1,804 vacant 15,000 Tradewell 20,000 Pay N Save 27.000 Ernst ... ..� .�,.. .. ►.. ,. +r:.�sr� 94�168 gross.x.9 net.st* - . . 466 cars 55 cars 84,751 net sf' = 1000 net sf} REQUIRED: PROVIDED: 466 cars 466 cars 140 compacts(max.) 125 compacts 'net sf= "Gross Leasable.' 1420 Filth Avenue Suite 2400 Seattle.Washington 98101 (206)623-4646 FAX:(206)623-4625 03/18•,91 13:57 206 235 8007 002 KINO COUNTY, WASHINGTON, OtUKrAcri WATER DESIQN MANUAL — - - Detentton Fevl mes There are two mein types of detention facilities: ponds;and, tanks or vaults. The method,of analysis and design standards for detention hankies can be found In Section 4.4 M chapter 4. Factor of mow The design volume of detention faolltties used to sleet the standard peak rate runoff control performance curve for the 2-and to-year, 24-Hour duration dsatdn storm ewes ON be inorsaied by a 30.percent factor of safety s requirement shall be met by Worming proportionally by 30 percent the design detention volume bleweign each 1 foot of storage depth without sing the total depth of storage or altering the design control or fice/weir sizing. Detention ems. Detention ponds are the most desirable alternative for detention faculties for water quality benefits. relative ease of Inspection and scoot.for maintenance. King County encourages the design of multi-purpose detention ponds which can serve the multiple r es of recreation (such as playgrounds or picnic areas), wildlife habitat (wetlands snag) and se a (landsoapino to provide for a natural appearance). Mufti-purpose ponds Must meet all the requirements of the purposes they are required to perform In multi-purpose ponds Incorporating recreational Tackles, the recreational faclli les must be designed In manner o0mpatible with,the storm water functions and matntehsnoe standards. Detention ponds may combine the performance requirements of wetponds (see Special Requirement li+a and Section 4.0.2 in Chapter 4). btt&entlo .and Vaults; Detention tanks and vaults are underground facilities for the storage of surface water. Tanks are typically constructed from corrugated pips and vaults are constructed from reinforced concrete. Tanks end vaults provide less water quality benefit (bioflltratlon and biologic activity) than ponds,therefore, bloflltratlon measures are especially important. Arkinq Let Popdirg Private parking lots may be used to provide additional peak rate runoff cont detention volume for the post-developed peak rates of runoff for design norms greater than the 10-year,24-hour duratlOf design storm provided that: (1) the depth of water detained can not wino 1.0 feet at any location In the parking lot; and (2) the minimum gradient of the perking lot area subject to pranging shall be 1 percent;and (3) the emergency overflow path meets the same requirements as for Infiltration systems. : Ponding of roofs of structures will be allowed to be used for peak rate runoff control detention v ume provided that: (1) the depth of Water ponded can not exceed 1,0 feet at any location on tine roof; and (2) the minimum pitch of the root area subject to ponding shall be 7/4 Inch to I loot: and (0) the roof support structure la analyzed by a structural engineer to sCi res3 tare weight of the pondud water; ant (4) the roof area subject to ponding Is water-proofed wan a method with a minimum svpeeted service life of 30 years. Retention facilities There are two basic types of retention faollittse: ponds and closed depressions. Retention panda are constructed by a combination of excavation and/or berming. Closed depressions may be established as retention facilities, and in eons cases enlarged to a000mmodate additional surface and stormwatsr runoff by excavation and/or berming. 1.2,3.3 1/90 _ 1 PROJECT IMPACTS AND MITIGATING MEASURES City of Renton Standards The City of Renton policy for traffic mitigation is set forth in a memo that is dis- tributed by the traffic division. For intersections.the policy states: "The developer is expected to maintain with their development the same level of ser- vice that would be anticipated in the horizon year if the site were not developed. (Unless the horizon year level of service is at C or above.)" The Village Place North project does not meet the city's threshold requirements for intersection mitigation: however. the project proponent will be providing three significant mitigating measures to reduce the effects of project generated traffic on the street system. The first is a transportation management plan(TMP).the second is a contribution to area- wide improvements in the S Grady Way transportation benefit district(TBD). and the third includes improvements to the S Grady Way/Labe Avenue S intersection. Transportation Management Plan The nature of traffic generated by office projects lends them to successful transportation management plans(TMPs). Currently.three office bnilviings on the Renton Village campus are occupied by Boeing. One Renton Place.Two Renton Place.and Three Renton Place. Successful TMPs are operated at these offices which consistently result in a 15 percent rideshare. Since Boeing will occupy the Village Place North building. it is suggested that a similar TMP be developed for the office portion of the project. S Grady Way Transportation Benefit District The City of Renton has implemented a plan to collect pro-rata contributions from new developments to fund areawide improvements in the S Grady Way TBD. The contribu- tions are based on the type of development and the number of daily trips it is estimated 89463.01 The TRANSPO Group,Inc. Page 17 THREE RENTON TWO RENTON ONE RENTON VILLAGE PLACE NORTH ERNST _ PARKING GARAGE EVERGREEN BF4QNVG s 2 6 . 250 WOE BEYOND 2 2 tip 157 , - 3 131 .,-r'^' I r.r -- 12 1 1 1 a coNrnauAna+of nom T. 79 MN • - t 7 SH T 11 24 1-405 { ,00 F A ,..-- ,, _. _ _____ . ,„-,_ 1:. ATTIAuf 0-0 . , noNs erawN►EweunED�►EAN 8EA LEVBL IN eNGEAST 50 1 0 290 300 490 500 T VTLIJAG]E H"Likat, NORTH SECTION ( .,44-r i MARCH 14, 1991 11803T.04 S- , L•L'-C 78 — 96 5e0. Level 4evattaAs i • se I , i iti` { RR yyt f � t� t - ` p ��� a ..*,, , \ \ TIV,, 't , '4r ft fi I iZO/0/�r^.' .�.. 1. `- 7" ``j�i mot,. _- _..��1.� �]�J�y�/���`1 \�� !: Z e .° f /ram t 1 ' ; ji L _ \� \�� F f ' .....�. - �..::.�'e'�"'-' dam/ r *�r�; • �\ I f i I�' �, Pacer � f 1/0..„,45,.,0_d .::-... a , tv ....< ._ sua. .Yt.`.1. r `")),it _aa. -- Utaticligielablafteitriglitrati .tf let,{�:,i 1. ' J"v./ - iG+`b'`yj'� 9..,...It.10ANi- , i......, le 7,‘-,-,, -, -:',11-73,1%,001_,-. .--- . -- -..s,..._:,:\:::„.6"1: ,,,`4.1. ' .. -.. .. ' F' , --" - - iew . s r.,_ • II If' 5 r ��- ... '4$3 '� .. �: ..-.. :fie.:!!•x. -..... .. . �m'4�> .sr�: ,. �. ,.Y, h, � 1. 4 f r ` : _r- ..@ Yii� r__. . a, ,- f ,:.A'.,,Y iYYr.,,: - . ,r a t-S - - . .s'7 :[71 :. _. m ,,. r rFn gy-_[g' Si.. sev.,. -..?.,... w�,�... ...:-�_. _-"; V� ..r �! �.►,i• I � JT' -. .-. •.- _ ;---,..-"m+ r. 7. _ �r - ,4#. .i s NA R 'ti 7.• a Cs��-..{ sash`.f rri .\• .. >r �:(�, ,�, - ^''i '� i ,? '��A► ,E �.i i ��'' I - a,,,,_: t� _ ...,.......4,,...i ftigil tp i 'r , ."� a �f1'4zn.� aY y44... , ''./..;j......,,. , ' C� cif yl � �koN6- `V/ — h` ,` ox-t, a t�`G(c-lam b, 1�! rite: ���fc � �r ` v- /� ' 3 •i� - 9/ 5A, c-U -0723 - To • • . AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE' BY MAILING • STATE JJ.F WASHINGTON ) . )ss. • County, of King ) • DOTTY .KLINGMAN , being first duly sworn, upon oath, deposes and states: That on the 5th day. of March , 1.991. - affiant deposited in the mails of the United States a sealed envelope containing a decision or recommendation with postage prepaid, addressed to the parties of record in the below entitled application or petition. • . ` •FF _A SUBSCRIBED SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this . (off day of Makridk. , 19 91,. • . 4 No ary lic in d f r the State of Washington , residin , therein. Application, Petition, or Case II: SA-CU-078-90 - R NTON VILLAGE ASSOCIATES (The minutes contain a list of the parties of,record.) February 5, 1991 OFFICE OF THE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND DECISION APPLICANT: RENTON VILLAGE ASSOCIATES File No: SA, CU-078-90 LOCATION: Renton Village Center/South Grady Way SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Site Plan approval for development of a new 260,363 sq. ft. office/retail sales building, ten stories/133 feet in height. Approval is also requested to construct a six level parking garage and renovation of an existing retail center and service areas. SUMMARY OF ACTION: Planning Division Recommendation: Approval, with conditions. PLANNING DIVISION REPORT: The Planning Division Report was received by the Examiner on February 5, 1991 PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Planning Division Report, examining available information on file with the application, and field checking the property and surrounding area, the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: MINUTES The hearing was opened on February 12, 1991 at 9:25 A.M. in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. The following exhibits were entered into the record: Exhibit #1 - Yellow File containing application, proof of posting and publication and other documentation pertinent to this request. Exhibit #2 - Vicinity Map Exhibit #3 - Site and Landscape Plan Exhibit #4 - Elevations of Parking Garage Exhibit #5 - Elevations of Office Building Exhibit #6 - Elevations of area to be remodeled The hearing opened with a presentation of the staff report by SENIOR PLANNER, LENORA BLAUMAN. Due to the length of the hearing, and testimony presented, below is a cursory review of testimony by all parties. After reviewing the site and surrounding areas, Blauman said the site where the building is to be located is currently vacant, the office building will be located in the center of the site with the parking garage located to the west of the building. The proposed building will be ten stories in height with retail space on the main level and offices occupying the remainder of the floors. The parking garage will be six levels, with some parking spaces being placed in reserve on the roof level (which will be used for recreational purposes); there will be 1768 parking spaces provided of which 1400 will be located in the parking garage. It was noted that Metro is considering the feasibility of expanding service to this general area. The ERC reviewed this proposal and issued revised mitigated conditions on December 21, 1990 (copy attached) which addressed such matters as aesthetic impacts, light and glare impacts, transportation system impacts, storm water management impacts, on-site and off-site recreation and-a construction management mitigation plan. Continuing, Ms. Blauman stated it is anticipated there will be approximately 2873 vehicle trips per day generated from the site, but measures have been set up to address this impact. Improved signage, T \ Renton Village Associates (Callison.Partnership) SA, CU-078-90 February 5, 1991 Page 2 signalization, and a study to be funded by the applicant to study traffic in the general area of the site will help to address further concerns about traffic impacts in the already impacted area. Blauman referenced grade and fill for the project and said it is felt this topic was addressed sufficiently in the Renton Cinema project, and the plans presented by this applicant so far appear to address any concerns that may arise for protecting the development and surrounding areas during the construction period. To mitigate on-site recreation impacts the applicant is providing a jogging trail, interior recreation areas for employees only, and will be contributing $20,000. for recreational amenities in the local community. Reviewing the criteria for site plan approval it was stated the proposal complies with the Comprehensive Plan Map, parking and loading ordinance, landscaping requirements, and development standards for commercial zoning. LOREN LASKO from Callison Partnership, responding to the Examiner's question about the private road within'the shopping center, stated South Renton Village Place is a city-owned road - part of the mitigation when the cinema was built was that Village Associates would extend that road up to Grady Way. Lake is to be maintained as a private road from south of Grady Way to where it abuts to South Renton Village Place behind the Ernst store. The entire length of Lake Road as it runs through the shopping center is considered a private road. The Examiner said it has been his understanding that private roads are not permitted in commercial and industrial subdivisions and why it is being permitted in this case. Planner Blauman said she understands in this instance it has been an existing arrangement and is not an'expansion of a non-conforming use. The proposed office tower will have about 800 - 1000 new employees, with approximately 200 of those to be located in the top levels of the tower offices. The parking garage will provide parking for both office users as well as commercial customers, with outside parking available for customers of the retail shops to be located on the first level of the proposed building. Noise, light and glare for surrounding residential properties on Talbot Hill was reviewed as well as view corridors interrupted by the height of the proposed building. Also reviewed was pedestrian circulation, a traffic analysis prepared by the Transportation Division and the mitigation measures to be developed; open space, signage, restricted time for parking, property values in the area, construction mitigation measures including hours of operation, and, in closing, staffs recommended conditions of approval were read into the record with an addition to 1(d) to read "The applicant shall provide improvements to the Ernst Center facade, and other facades as necessary." At the hour of 10:30 A.M. a ten minute recess was taken. When the hearing reconvened at 10:40 BRIAN CLOEPFIL of Callison Partnership, 1420 - 5th Avenue, Suite 2400, Seattle 98101, reviewed the conceptual plan and approach to the project addressing the expansion of retail needs in the area, the public image they wished to maintain; height of the proposed building and how they feel it fits into the skyline of the area without impacting light and air qualities; amenities that will be provided to employees as well as the community; parking garage and parking to be held in reserve, storm drainage, water retention on the ground floor of the garage, open space, glare on Grady Way and Talbot Road with a possible redesign of window facades, landscaping on the roof of the parking structure (which will also be used for a while as a recreation area for employees) and lot coverages. Mr. Cloepfil also stated it was not felt a elevator was necessary in the garage as there would be a skybridge provided on the second level of the parking structure with access from'the office building (there will still be four stories in the parking structure above the skybridge). When asked to provide parking calculations, Planner Blauman stated there will be a total of 1768 spaces'provided, of those there will be 1400 in the garage, of the 1400, 1300 will be for office employees and 100 for retail users. In the open air there are 357 parking spaces for retail users. The city will call for 20% of those to be put in reserve (about 250) which will be in the garage and for the retail center some spaces maybe in reserve in open space .�. 91C,t g g is. p or the garage. Local resident, and speaking for other Talbot Hill residents, JOHN PAVONE 1407 Shattuck Avenue South. Renton 98055 spoke in opposition to this proposal stating the area around the shopping center, and in particular Talbot Hill, is now almost impossible to exit during the normal course of a day and said he cannot understand how city staff can support a statement that an additional 2800 plus vehicles added to that corridor would not create an impact on the whole area. He feels it is imperative that an in-depth traffic study be completed and the current gridlock in the area be seriously addressed by the city before this project is allowed to move forward. He also addressed the loss of view corridor for his home with a ten story building intrusion, which will in turn effect the property value of his home. Testifying on behalf of the Traffic Division for the city was CLINT MORGAN, who presented a review of the level of service (LOS) for eleven major intersections in the city - which included the Rainier Avenue, Grady Way, Talbot Road, Puget Drive, Benson Road, Main Avenue intersections. He said he had no idea when the Rainier/Grady Way intersection would be expanded and acknowledged only about 1/10th of the cost would be paid by the applicant ($400,000.00) with no other funding set aside for the project at this time. He said it would take funds other than TBZ funds to do a project of this size. He acknowledged Benson and Grady Way is currently at level F and will remain at level F with or without this new project. He said an intermediate traffic study was done to address channelization of Grady Way and right turn lanes. It is assumed the applicant will take part in this study and Mr. Morgan said there will be no need to acquire property to achieve this channelization. MR. LOREN LASKO advised that there are four separate ownerships of property along that corridor Renton Village Associates (Callison Partnership) SA, CU-078-90 February 5, 1991 Page 3 (Holiday Inn, Chevron, Renton Village properties and One, Two and Three Renton Place are also under separate ownership). He said there is no city right-of-way along the undeveloped third lane along Grady Way or Talbot Road. Trying to clarify - the Hearing Examiner summarized saying the levels of service in some cases are approaching level E and will become E or F with or without the project. Mr. Morgan said he felt the additional traffic from this project will increase the length of peak hour traffic for the area, and some drivers will try to find other routes. RANDALL PARSONS from the city's Storm Water Utility Division responded to questions from the Examiner regarding the storm drainage system, water management mitigation plans for this project, garage basement ponding in the proposed parking garage, and water accumulations in the outside parking lot. Also adding other comments was BRIAN CLOEPFIL who said engineers are looking at solutions to the possible flooding on the south portion of the site and feels a solution can be worked out that addresses the concerns by Mr. Pavone regarding loss of view corridors. He said the heights involved meet requirements set out by the FAA. He said impacts to residents may be more recognizable because of the mixed zoning in the area and the influx of more development in an urban area as opposed to additional residential development. In closing comments Planner Blauman noted the width of buildings would be approximately 200 ft.; the applicant is providing a total of 1768 parking spaces based on leasable rather than gross square footage; the parking proposed does not include phase 2 parking because there is no phase 2 development yet. But, phase 2 could, at a maximum, include 850 additional parking spaces but it is hoped that the reserve parking from the current proposed phase could possibly be used to offset that figure. Lot coverage in the commercial zone is usually 66% but with the proposed parking garage lot coverage will go up to 75% with lot coverage now between 45-48%. Blauman noted the city is currently working on view corridor regulations; she said staff is working to maintain a balance between new and existing development keeping,in mind constraints on the site as well as the needs of the neighborhood and desirability of providing development which will enhance the appearance and function of the community. The issue of grade and fill was addressed and why a permit was not issued for the site. Ms. Blauman said there is a grade and fill permit per se handled by the Building Division after the proposal goes through the land use and environmental review. What is being done at this time is incorporating an assessment of fill and grade impacts on a project within the environmental and land use impacts so even though grade and fill is not called out specifically when asking for an erosion control plan and storm drainage management plan and soils analysis, staff does incorporate into those evaluations the impacts that would come from the type and amount of soil on the site. The Examiner called for further testimony regarding this project. There was no one else wishing to speak, and no further comments from staff. Due to the length and complexity of the hearing the Examiner requested, and was granted, an additional week to issue his decision. The hearing closed at 11:50 A.M. FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & DECISION: Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: 1. The applicant, Renton Village Associates/Callison Partnership, filed a request for approval of a Site Plan for an office/retail complex, parking garage, and renovation of a retail center, together with a Conditional Use Permit to allow the office building to exceed the 95 foot height limit imposed in the B-1 (Business/Commercial) zone. 2. The yellow file containing the staff report, the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) documentation and other pertinent materials was entered into the record as Exhibit #1. 3. The Environmental Review Committee (ERC), the City's responsible official, issued a Declaration of Non-Significance - Mitigated (DNS-M) for the subject proposal. (See below). 4. The subject proposal was reviewed by all departments with an interest in the matter. 5. The subject site is part of the Renton Village Shopping Center. The site is south of South Grady Way and east of Lake Avenue South. South Renton Village Place runs along the south margin of the project site as Lake Avenue'curves into it. Talbot Road South is located at the east edge of the shopping center, while I-405 defines the south margin of the shopping center. Apparently, Lake Avenue wouild be deveoped as a private roadway. 6. The map element of the Comprehensive Plan designates the area in which the subject site is located as suitable for the development of commercial uses, but does not mandate such development without consideration of other policies of the Plan. Renton Village Associates (Callison Partnership) SA, CU-078-90 February 5, 1991 Page 4 7. The site was annexed to the city with the adoption of Ordinance 1547, enacted in May, 1956. 8. The proposal consists of three major components: a. A 10-story complex with office space located over retail facades and with a combined floor area of approximately 260,363 square feet; b. A 6-level parking garage; and c. Renovation of part of the existing retail complex. 9. Site plan review is required of these three facets of the proposal. 10. The B-1 zone permits buildings up to 95 feet in height. Buildings may be permitted to exceed that limit if a conditional use permit is warranted. 11. The block in which the subject proposal would be located contains generally from east to west and north to south, two of the three Renton Place buildings., the 'L' shaped retail complex that contains Pay and Save, the supermarket and smaller retail shops, the Ernst Store, the third Renton Place office building, the newly renovated theater complex to the south, the gasoline service station along Grady, the Evergreen Building and the Holiday Inn. 12. While this mix of uses appears to be under one ownership, the uses are developed on a number of legally segregated parcels. The frontage along Grady is owned by at least four different entities, including the applicant. 13. The combined office building/retail use would be located just west of the existing grocery/Pay and Save complex. Existing parking for the complex would intervene between the developments. 14. The parking garage would be located on what would be the southeast corner of the intersection of Grady and Lake. It would be just west of the proposed office building. It would be connected to the office building by a second level skybridge. 15. The proposed renovations would occur to the retail complex which now consists of the grocery store, Pay and Save, and smaller retail uses. In addition to new facade treatment, an arcade/walkway would be opened through the existing retail businesses. This walkway would provide easier passage to the front of the retail stores and the new retail stores located on the lower level of the proposed office building for tenants of the Renton Place buildings. 16. A variety of other uses are located north and east of the subject site, outside the scope of this large superblock. North of the site is a Metro Park and Ride Lot. Light industrial and a mix of residential uses are also located north of the site, generally north of So. 7th Street. East of the site (across Talbot Road) are the Puget Power offices. Car dealerships are located on both the northeast corner and northwest corner of Rainier and Grady, northwest of the subject site. A variety of other commercial, mainly office uses,are located west of Rainier along Grady. 17. The ERC imposed a number of mitigation measures on the proposal. These measures can be grouped together under various topics as follows: a. Transportation related measures that address contributing to the pending Grady Way Benefit Zone; providing improvements to the Grady/Lake intersection; street lighting improvements; voluntarily contribution for a study of Grady between Rainier and Talbot and possible contribution to its improvement (both conditions appear voluntary); provide a transportation management plan (TMP) for ride-sharing, Metro usage and other related issues; placing parking into reserve to discourage driving; b. Aesthetic and recreational related measures that address landscaping and light and glare (glare also raised safety issues related to reflection on nearby roadways during certain seasons); and on-site recreation; and a fee of $20,000 to mitigate off-site recreational impacts; c. Storm water management plans to address the flood plain and displacement of storm water by this development; and hold harmless agreement in favor of the city which states "the applicants have decided to proceed, at their own volition, thereby waiving their rights to hold the municipality liable for any flooding and/or for any damages to property or person arising from such flooding;" and Renton Village Associates (Callison Partnership) SA, CU-078-90 February 5, 1991 Page 5 d. Construction management related issues including hauling routes, dust and erosion control, soil remediation if necessary, and staging areas. (See the attached ERC determination for the full text of the measures) 18. The proposed building will be ten (10) stories, or 133 feet tall. 19. The building will contain approximately 260,363 square feet of net office space. The first floor will contain approximately 13,650 square feet of retail space. The approximately 79,000 square feet of existing retail space will be remodeled. 20. The first floor of the office building will be wider and longer than the upper levels. The first floor will provide a pedestal of sorts that will house retail operations. The remaining floors, housing office space, will be narrower. A canopy will provide a covered walkway along the east retail facade and wrap around the north and south facades. The building facade at both the retail, first floor level and at the upper levels will be very intricate. The colonnaded east facade will contain store fronts, while the south facade will be indented to provide room for part of a plaza. The west facade at ground level and roof level will be gently re-curved along its northern half. The facade of the upper stories will be articulated at the corners with 16 foot deep indents. In addition, the building will step in, as indicated above the first floor, and at the tenth floor level. The building will use a wide variety of architectural features to minimize the apparent bulk and mass of the structure. 21. The facade will consist of bands of grey-beige painted concrete, and windows of reflective blue-green glass. Accent treatment will consist of porcelain tiles in bluish tones or other accent colors. The tile treatment will be found at both the base of the building and along the top. The retail treatment will be plaster painted to match the remaining features of the building. 22. The windows will be set in at an angle to minimize glare and reflection. This was a particular concern along Grady Way. An analysis of sun angle and glare found some problems along Grady during certain periods of the year. Staff has indicated that those problems will be resolved by appropriate window placement. Neighbors south of I-405 want the same assurances since they would be affected by reflection in the southerly direction, particularly by a tall building. 23. The first floor footprint is approximately 144 feet wide (east/west dimension) and approximately 280 feet long (north/south dimension. The upper stories will have a narrower profile. The building would be approximately 120 feet wide and 256 feet long. Again, these dimension would be affected by the irregular facade of these upper stories. 24. The applicant proposes developing a six-level parking garage. The first level of the garage will be below the new grade of the site. The garage is an irregular trapezoid. The garage is will be approximately 192 feet wide (east/west), at its widest (north facade), by approximately 480 feet long (north/south). The west wall of the garage breaks and turns inward to the southeast about two-thirds of the way south along the north/south axis. The garage would be approximately 80 feet from the office building. 25. The exterior treatment of the garage would mirror the office building. It will have painted concrete walls and open bands matching the appearance of the office building's bands of concrete and windows. It will also receive similar accent treatment. There will be recessed areas to provide visual relief along the longer walls. Texture changes and indents at the corners along the north side are also intended to reduce the apparent bulk of the building. Staff has recommended that the stairwells be open for safety reasons. The applicant does not propose providing an elevator in the garage - relying on the stairways and the skybridge link at the second level. 26. The garage is designed to provide 1,401 parking stalls. An additional 367 stalls will be located in the open parking lot generally east of the office building. Staff has recommended that twenty percent of the stalls be placed in reserve to discourage driving. Stalls will be divided between office tenants and retail shoppers. Staff has recommended that the reserved parking be used for landscaping. Reserve stalls located on the top level of the garage would be temporarily used for recreation. 27. The applicant will also be renovating the existing tier of retail stores east of the proposed office building and parking lot. The complex will receive a colonnaded facade that matches the lower level of the office building. Decorative towers will match the accent detail of the office building and garage. These towers will apparently contain a reader board or boards. As indicated, there will be a passage-way through the center of this retail complex that permits easy pedestrian passage between the various buildings on the east and west. Paving stones, • Renton Village Associates (Callison Partnership) SA, CU-078-90 February 5, 1991 Page 6 walkways and accent detail will link the proposal's various elements. Staff recommended that the Ernst complex receive similar treatment. The applicant did not propose any renovation to the Ernst facade since the entire building may be renovated later. 28. The applicant proposes greatly enhanced landscaping along the boundaries of this portion of the complex. There will be landscaping along Grady and Lake north and west of the garage. Larger trees are proposed adjacent to the garage to further reduce its apparent bulk. Landscaping will complement the plaza along the south edge of the office building. There will be landscaping in the parking areas, near aisle ends and near the center of some of the parking rows. Trees will also be used on the top of the garage. 29. The proposal is estimated to generate an additional 2,873 vehicle trips per day. The traffic analysis of the project was limited in scope and did not address the impact on Level of Service (LOS) on some of the intersections near the proposal. At the public hearing staff provided additional information on LOS. The Level of Service is as follows: - Grady and Rainier LOS will drop from LOS E to LOS F. It is estimated that the LOS would drop to LOS F in any event. - Talbot and Grady LOS will drop from LOS D to LOS E. Again, it is anticipated that the LOS would drop to LOS E without the project. - The Grady and Benson LOS will remain at LOS F. 30. LOS F is generally described as extreme blockage and in qualitative terms is considered intolerable. When additional traffic is added to intersections with an LOS F, generally intolerable conditions last for a longer period. The additional traffic is spread over a longer period of time lengthening the peak hour commute. Drivers also seek alternate routes to avoid the impeded intersections and spillover onto local roadways. 31. Most of the intersections in the vicinity of the subject site are already strained with high LOS during rush hour. Improvements are proposed for Grady and Rainier, but the plans are indeterminate at this time. The applicant would contribute to a fund that would be used to rebuild that intersection. The amount contributed would be approximately one-tenth of the required funding for these improvements. Turning movements and traffic are also impeded along Talbot Road south of the site. 32. Staff suggested additional improvements would be studied to improve the Grady Way corridor and provide pass-through lanes and turning lanes. Additional right-of-way along the south side of Grady adjacent to the subject site would have to be acquired from the four or five property owners along this corridor. 33. The site is highly susceptible to flooding. The parking lot and area proposed for development serves to contain storm water on a regular basis. The current level of flooding would not be modified by the development of the subject site. The site would still be subject to periodic inundation according to staff analysis, but the applicant would not be permitted to further exacerbate the flooding. The applicant and staff have provided some preliminary proposals for providing compensating storm water storage. Each of the plans has some difficulties. One plan would use the lower level of the garage to hold storm water. Alarm systems and gates would be required to screen the garage and prevent inadvertent entry of pedestrians or vehicles if the garage is flooded. Another proposal would be to construct below grade vaults to hold the storm water, but eventual siltation would have to be managed and prevented. A third proposal would convey the water south, under I-405 to the Valley wetlands. This proposal would require a number of permits and additional storm sewer line construction. 34. The applicant has provided a "Hold Harmless Agreement" to protect the city in the event property or persons are harmed as a result of flooding that occurs after the site is developed. This agreement was required since current flood conditions would not be alleviated and the inundation that has occurred in the past would be expected to continue. Staff and the applicant agreed that the applicant is not responsible for solving the existing conditions. Staff has suggested some overall solutions but those-would not be implemented at this time. 35. A second phase to this proposal has been discussed that would replace the Ernst complex with an additional office building with retail located on the street level. The proposal is speculative and is not further reviewed in this analysis. Renton Village Associates (Callison Partnership) SA, CU-078-90 February 5, 1991 Page 7 CONCLUSIONS 1. This proposal presents some unusual aspects that complicate any decision. The proposal has some very satisfactory elements, but it creates some highly objectional impacts. This is a project that has an attractive building with a lot of interesting detail. It provides visual interest, attractive amenties, and a focal point in its height (and the status of being the first building of this height in the city). It also provides a significant upgrading of a retail center. Finally, it is an economic magnet. 2. Balanced against those very positive aspects we have a building that will be taller than anything nearby; one that is on the outskirts of the downtown core, one that will block views, and one that because of its height will accommodate more tenants, and, therefore, generate additional traffic (potentially 15 to 20 percent more traffic to the area). This analysis ignores the suggestion by staff that a possible two building option might introduce as much traffic, since two buildings are not before this office for review. This taller building also requires a very large parking garage. 3. Ignoring for the moment the traffic generated by an unusually tall building, there is the simple issue of additional traffic that even a routinely sized office building will generate on an already burdened street system. And finally, in the category of what could be considered the major negative aspects of this proposal, there is the flooding situation at this site which is quite serious. 4. Therefore, before discussing the specific site plan and conditional use criteria a general discussion of some of the potential problems seems necessary. First, both the Comprehensive Plan and the Zoning Code would generally permit the subject proposal (although not as tall a building) at this location, subject to reasonable review and conditions. The 133 foot tall building can be permitted under the Zoning Code by a Conditional Use Permit. (See criteria in the discussion below). The Zoning Code provides no distinction between high rise commercial offices and mom and pop grocery stores. The single B-1 zone does not provide any segregation of such uses and therefore, neighbors and property owners, respectively, cannot anticipate what might be proposed or permitted on any particular B-1 zoned parcel. 5. Following that preliminary discussion, there are two major areas of concern, traffic and flooding, as well as subsidiary issues that concern a six level garage without an elevator, and potential view blockage. 6. The first issue is traffic. Most of the major streets and intersections surrounding the subject site are struggling to accommodate existing traffic. Traffic has already reached an LOS of F at Grady and Benson. Traffic at Grady and Talbot and Grady and Rainier are LOS D/E and will approach and reach LOS F in the near future. Level of Service (LOS) ranges from LOS A which denotes a free flowing intersection to LOS F which denotes the worst case where demand exceeds capacity and where severe congestion and delay are occurring. 7. There is no doubt that the ERC addressed the issue by requiring the payment of a substantial fee. Unfortunately, the fee will not provide any practical results for quite some time. The payment of monies may or may not contribute to a solution of the additional traffic that this proposal will generate since there is no time certain for improvements to these corridors. In addition, the solutions will require other funding sources since the Grady Way Benefit District, when it is formed, will not address intersections other than the major one at Grady and Rainier. The condemnation of additional right-of-way along Grady as suggested by staff will require further funding since these properties are in a variety of ownerships. Therefore, instead of actually mitigating the adverse traffic conditions (and payments do not mitigate anything, payments may eventually be used to mitigate those adverse conditions), the rush hour will become extended making traffic insufferable, and in some cases dangerous, since emergency vehicles will be prevented from negotiating through the area. 8. Staff indicated that the proposal would add approximately four percent to the traffic in the area. The fee would approach approximately one-tenth of the necessary costs of improving the Grady/Rainier intersection. And, this solution does not concretely address the other roadways that need improvement including Talbot at Grady, Talbot south of the site, and Grady and Benson. In addition, it has been found that too much traffic suffocates commercial uses (particularly retail uses) since shoppers tend to avoid congested areas. 9. The issues regarding traffic can be stated as follows: Should additional development that will generate more traffic be permitted when the system is already burdened? That's difficult to resolve when evaluating a very well-designed project. But, it does appear necessary to strive for a greater reduction in traffic. Therefore, in order to reduce the traffic the building should Iry Renton Village Associates (Callison Partnership) SA, CU-078-90 February 5, 1991 Page 8 be scaled down in height. Other reasons for this reduction are discussed below under the Conditional Use analysis. 10. The second major issue is that of the recurrent flooding which inundates portions of the subject site - flooding that will not be addressed by the current development. While the subject proposal is designed so that it would not worsen the existing situation, it does absolutely nothing to eliminate a potentially unsafe existing situation. Actually, no final storm water containment design has been presented since each plan has some problems that would need very careful analysis. 11. The city has an affirmative duty to provide and protect for the public health, safety and welfare. Approving additional construction in this area, flood plain or not (this was not satisfactorily resolved, even by the "Hold Harmless Agreement") does not seem to fulfill the duty to protect the public health, safety or welfare. Preventing additional flooding does not address the existing severe problem. 12. Imposing a condition that asks that the city be released from damages is poor planning. It also demonstrates that the city acknowledges the.problem. It is inappropriate to ignore such a prominent issue and it is untenable not to actually solve it. The execution of a Hold Harmless Agreement merely affirms that a problem exists. Approving additional development at this site would only demonstrate that the city would be closing its eyes to the potential problems and merely preserving its purse if harm did result. The site floods - pure and simple! It has flooded for years, and each of the previous solutions has been as ineffective as the ones that followed it. But, each "solution" has been used to justify more development. The execution of a "Hold Harmless Agreement" does not address the issue appropriately. Something that increases the chance for serious injury or worse, and encourages more people to congregate in this area is not an effective treatment of this long recognized ill. 13. The applicant argues that the existing flooding is not a problem they created and they cannot address it alone. It seems inconceivable that the applicant would argue that flooding which would surround the subject site is not their problem, and then add more buildings and people to the situation. 14. The applicant's solution is no solution. The applicant proposes mitigating the impacts of its development by storing in some fashion storm water that would otherwise be displaced by filling the site for the new building and parking garage. It does nothing about the existing situation. The applicant will be encouraging more people to work, shop and park in an area subject to severe inundation, without solving the problem. During floods we will then have a building or buildings (if one includes the parking structure) that could become islands in the flood waters that already occur regularly. During heavy, but not infrequent rains, flooding will still occur. The parking lot will still flood, cars will still be submerged. and quite possibly these new structures will be islands that could require evacuation. 15. It does not matter who created the problem of flooding, or when it was created, or whether this applicant is 'responsible' for solving the existing situation. Flooding occurs on the site on a regular basis and adding more people, cars, and improvements without first, finally solving that situation is irrational. 16. The other important issues are the parking garage and the view blockage. The applicant has proposed a large garage that will be prominently located on the site. Design details will attempt to lessen the bulk but it is still almost 500 feet long and six stories high. In any event, the garage appears well designed given the task of providing parking for 1,400 vehicles, except for the fact that it does not have an elevator. It appears that the applicant has proposed a six level parking garage that for all practical purposes will be hard to access without an elevator. The legally handicapped would not be alone in finding four flights of steps an impractical obstacle. The elderly, women dressed in heels, and those carrying or delivering items would find accessing the upper levels of the garage a formidable task. Even with the proposed second level skybridge, four flights of stairs would be required for outside patrons and building tenants to reach upper level parking. 17. While the handicapped will be provided with ground level or skybridge level parking spaces, others would be left to negotiate four flights of stairs or meander up four tiers of a gently sloping ramp system. The alternative of walking the gentle ramp ignores the fact that walking the series of ramps would require a stroll of a Quarter to a half mile. This is the result of the fact that each long leg of the garage is approximately 480 feet in length. Spiraling up and down the ramp adds up, and would be a major accomplishment on foot. 18. While there may be security issues in providing an elevator, it seems that if the city-is going to encourage urban amenities and larger buildings they will have to tackle the security issues Renton Village Associates (Callison Partnership) SA, CU-078-90 February 5, 1991 Page 9 inherent in such development. An elevator in a six level parking garage does not appear to be an amenity as much as a necessary requirement for such a tall structure. 19. Finally, before tackling the actual site plan and associated conditional use permit, the issue of view blockage should be addressed. City code provisions do not address the issue of view blockage, although the Comprehensive Plan suggests views should be preserved. This issue is related in a remote fashion to the absence in the Zoning Code of language that clearly distinguishes between urban commercial uses and suburban or neighborhood commercial use. It also relates back to the Comprehensive Plan which does not provide sufficient guidance when it suggests that a parcel is appropriate for commercial uses but does not distinguish between the low-rise shopping center (the predecessor of all the development that has occurred on this site) as meeting commercial objectives, and tall high-rise office buildings. The view of the southern neighbors, those on Talbot Hill, will be permanently altered by this development as it was by the construction of the Evergreen Building. Substituted for views of Lake Washington and Mercer Island in the distance, will be urban lights in the foreground. It is impossible to make a qualitative determination on the issue. As long as the problems of glare and reflection are adequately addressed, the question of view cannot be otherwise weighed in this analysis. As suggested by staff, recessing the windows and changing their angle slightly should eliminate glare and reflection problems. 20. A separate issue is presented by the question of whether a 133 foot building should be located in this area, when such permit authority is discretionary, as it is under the Conditional Use provisions. (See the discussion below) Site Plan Approval 21. The site plan ordinance provides a number of specific criteria for reviewing a site plan. Those criteria are generally represented in part by the following enumeration: a. Conformance with the Comprehensive Plan; b. Conformance with the Building and Zoning Codes; c. Mitigation of impacts on surrounding properties and uses; d. Mitigation of the impacts of the proposal on the subject site itself; e. Conservation of property values; f. Provision for safe and efficient vehicle and pedestrian circulation; g. Provision of adequate light and air; h. Adequacy of public services to accommodate the proposed use; As conditioned below, the proposed use satisfies these and other particulars of the ordinance. 22. The site's designation as commercial by the Comprehensive Plan leaves out many pertinent issues. Similarly the site's B-1 zoning does not provide any assistance in determining whether the proposal is appropriate in this location. The proposal does continue the trend that has occurred along Grady from Benson to Rainier. Larger office buildings are found along this corridor than in other areas of the city. The proposal will most certainly improve the retail aspects of the site and provide unifying elements tying the immediate site's components to the Renton Place buildings by pedestrian links. The 800 to 1,000 tenants would strengthen the economic prospects of this area. 23. It appears unlikely that as staff reports, that developing this site near two major arterials will minimize both travel and congestion. The proximity to I-405 could minimize travel but the traffic congestion will only be exacerbated by this development. 24. With the exception of the 95 foot height limit the applicant seeks to exceed, the proposal meets the requirements of the Building Code. The proposal does not exceed the 75% lot coverage, and all of the facilities meet or exceed minimum setbacks. The applicant has also provided more than adequate landscaping around the buildings, along the periphery, and in the parking lots. The Fire Department has reviewed fire safety in regards to this proposed tall building. 25. As has already been stated, the building provides, besides its unique height, interesting design features including a first floor colonnade, the top floor's intricate curved detailing, tile accent treatment, articulations and landscaped plaza and entry. If anything, there may be too much s Renton Village Assoc on r (Callison Partnership) SA, CU-078-90 February 5, 1991 Page 10 emphasis on intricacy. The eye-catching towers that incorporate a reader board or boards detract from the proposal. All aspects of these towers that appear to be signs should be subject to strict review under the sign code. Even the parking garage has been spruced up with substantial efforts at masking its proposed size. Texture changes reflecting those found in the office building will break up the garage's expansive east facade. Similar elements including accent tile, indented panels and corners will also aid in its appearance. Landscaping will tie the project together and screen the various elements. The project is quite acceptable from an aesthetic design standpoint. 26. The large buildings, both the six story garage and the proposed ten story office building, will definitely have an impact on other property. As mentioned earlier, views will be blocked - not only the views of residents to the south, but the views from the other tall buildings. These impacts are to be expected. Presumably the modification to the facade and window treatment will minimize or eliminate unnecessary glare and reflection on these viewers. One thing that must be addressed is the glare on roadways near the site. As first envisioned, the proposal would have had drivers along Grady subjected to up to 5 to 10 seconds of reflected sunlight. Staff indicated that the glare will be reduced to negligible levels that should not impact safety. 27. The two issues prominently discussed above, traffic and flooding, have not been adequately addressed by the proposal. Approximately 2,800 additional vehicle trips will be generated by the proposal. These trips will be added to a road system that is severely congested according to Traffic Engineering standards. Both the existing LOS E and F point to critical conditions on these roads. It does not appear that traffic issues can be appropriately addressed by the payment of a fee that will not counter the immediate adverse impact this additional traffic will have on the area's roadways. Therefore, the project should be scaled back. The building should be limited to the 95 feet permitted in the B-1 zone. While the project will still generate a substantial amount of traffic, it will be reduced somewhat by a reduction in tenant occupancy. This office would recommend that the upper level treatment be maintained and that intermediate floors be reduced in number to preserve the interesting features found near the top of the building. A beneficial side effect of reducing the office building's height would be that the parking garage could also be reduced in bulk. The garage's size reduction obviously follows any reduction in building height in a comensurate fashion. 28. On the issue of the flooding which occurs even in the absence of this proposal, it seems certain that before any additional development can occur, the flooding situation should be solved. The proposal cannot be approved without a viable solution since construction with the now existing flooding problem only increases the potential for injury both to personal property and to persons. 29. Therefore, avoiding the applicant's reliance on SEPA's limitations that only permit one to condition a project based upon impacts that are specific to the project, this decision is predicated not on SEPA, but on the inherent right to condition a project to protect the public, health, safety and welfare. It is imprudent to further develop the subject site with the flood potential that now exists. 30. Therefore, the applicant will have to solve the flooding, whether it is by individual action or concerted action that involves an LID or other method, prior to the issue of any building permit. As for compensating flood water storage, utilizing the lower level of the public garage re-introduces the potential for injury. The garage shall not be used to hold flood waters. 31. The development will probably increase the property value of the subject site. Initially, development of the site will probably depress residential property values upslope from the site. Whether the loss of views from the adjacent office buildings will affect values is difficult to assess. 32. The pedestrian amenities are geared to provide easy passage through and around the site. Sidewalks and pathways link the various elements of the site together. They also separate pedestrians from vehicular traffic. 33. In summary, except for the large garage (which reduction in size should now.address), the absence of any positive solution to the flood situation and the poor traffic LOS, the proposal would provide an interesting addition to the city. Renton Village Associates)(Callison Partnership) SA, CU-078-90 February 5, 1991 Page 11 Conditional Use Permit 34. The request to build a building more than 95 feet tall requires a conditional use permit. The applicant for a Conditional Use Permit must demonstrate that the use is in the public interest, will not impair the health, safety or welfare of the general public and is in compliance with the criteria found in Section 4-31-36 (C) which provides in part that: a. The proposal generally conforms with the Comprehensive Plan; b. There is a general community need for the proposed use at the proposed location; c. There will be no undue impacts on adjacent property; d. The proposed use is compatible in scale with the adjacent residential uses, if any; e. Parking, unless otherwise permitted, will not occur in the required yards; f. Traffic and pedestrian circulation will be safe and adequate for the proposed project; g. Noise, light and glare will not cause an adverse affect on neighboring property; h. Landscaping shall be sufficient to buffer the use from rights-of-way and neighboring property where appropriate; and i. Adequate public services are available to serve the proposal. The requested conditional use permit cannot be justified given the extreme traffic congestion in the area, the size of the garage necessary to support an extra tall building, and the fact that the building is inappropriate given the surroundings. 35. This site is at the edge of the downtown business district. It has already developed a character with its six and seven story buildings that do not exceed the normal code requirements. The site is segregated from the growing office park center in the Valley and does not flow naturally toward it. The break provided by I-405 in this area separates the site not from other commercial uses but from low-rise single family homes on Talbot Hill to the south: While the site may provide for a logical extension of commercial uses from the downtown commercial core, it is not a logical extension of downtown in terms of height. It is not compatible with surrounding uses. The building breaks the height boundaries set by the neighboring buildings at this edge of the natural commercial area. While staff correctly suggests that this is a growing commercial center, it would appear that the term 'center' is misused or misapplied. While variegated height would provide a level of visual interest, this can just as well be provided by the differing form this building already presents. It is very different from its more blocky predecessors in the Renton Place series or the Evergreen Building. 36. Further, height becomes an additional issue when it gives rise to secondary impacts. By increasing the height of the building, one increases the tenant density and this in turn increases traffic both during rush hour and even at off-peak hours. While the numbers may not be directly proportional, increasing the building's height by a third increases traffic similarly. 37. An increase in tenant density also requires a larger parking structure. What is interesting in reviewing this proposal is that the city now faces a five to six story parking structure, whereas in the past it was only the office "towers" that reached six stories. 38. Staff suggested that a taller building would probably be better than a wider one as it would provide more open space. Balancing a potentially wider building is not necessary, since like the concept of the "two towers approach" that is not the question. Neither a two tower approach nor a wider building approach need be reviewed absent a design plan. Those questions would have to be resolved if a plan for such buildings were proposed. So while a wider building may be more or less desirable, that does not necessarily justify this proposed 10 story building. The factors that weigh against the taller, 10 story building are the additional traffic the proposal would generate, the larger garage necessary to support the proposed building, the additional view blockage that would result, and the fact that the building varies too widely from its surroundings at the edge, not the center of the downtown core. 39. This office need not discuss the other issues required by Conditional Use since the permit is not warranted. But for purposes of providing a complete record, the criteria for conditional use permits mirror those for site plan review, with the additional elements of showing community need. There does not seem to be a community need for a taller building at this location. It seems appropriate to channel additional office growth in the downtown core where traffic Renton Village Associates (Callison Partnership) SA, CU-078-90 February 5, 1991 Page 12 would be less of a problem and where a taller building would provide more of a needed identity and focus. DECISION The Conditional Use Permit is denied. The Site Plan is approved subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant shall comply with the conditions imposed by the ERC subject to a pro rata reduction in fees as affected by this determination. 2. In order to protect the public, health, safety and welfare, no additional development of this site shall occur until the current flooding problem is resolved. The applicant shall have to solve the flooding, whether it is by individual action or by concerted action that involves an LID or other method, prior to the issuance of any building permit. 3. The storm drainage system developed for this proposal shall be approved, in writing, by the appropriate city officials. The proposed system must satisfactorily demonstrate that it will not increase flooding on the site or adjacent to the site and provides for 100% (One Hundred Percent) compensating storm water storage. 4. The building shall not exceed 95 feet in height. Any reduction shall be achieved by reducing the intermediate floors that provide the basic rectangular floor plan. That is, the detail found at,the ground floor and the upper story shall be preserved in the final 95 foot building if possible. 5. The lower level of the garage shall not be used for compensating flood storage as it will unduly jeopardize the public health, safety and welfare of the general public. 6. The garage shall be reduced in size to provide a reduction in parking stalls in proportion to the reduction in office building size. 7. If the parking garage is more than 4 levels high it shall be equipped with an elevator. 8. The parking garage and all security related to the garage shall be subject to the approval of the City of Renton, but in no event shall the elevator be eliminated unless the garage is reduced to four levels or less. - 9. All windows on the office building and any reflective materials, including but not limited to trim and accent materials, utilized on any aspect of the proposal shall be designed and installed to reduce glare to insubstantial levels on adjacent roadways and nearby residential uses. 10. All landscape materials shall be guaranteed for a period of at least three years by the posting of a bond or other suitable instrument. ORDERED THIS 5th day of February, 1991. FRED J. K FMAN � r HEARING EXAMINER TRANSMITTED THIS 5th day of February, 1991. to the parties of record: Brian Cloepfil Callison Partnership 1420 - 5th Avenue, Suite 2400 Seattle, WA 98101 Loren Lasko Callison Partnership 1420 - 5th Avenue, Suite 2400 Seattle, WA 98101 Renton Village Associates (Callison Partnership) SA, CU-078-90 February 5, 1991 Page 13 John Pavone 1407 Shattuck Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 Marjorie Elfers 1612 Lake Avenue So. Renton, WA 98055 Mary Highton 312 So. 15th Street Renton, WA 98055 Lola Todd P. O. Box 1591 Renton, WA 98057 Ina V. Woodin 3901 Park Avenue No. Renton, WA 98056 Grace Van Eyk 230 So. 15th Renton, WA 98055 Richard Teo Renton Talbot Delaware c/o GSIC Realty 333 Twin Dolphins Drive, Suite 700 Redwood City, CA 94065 Mark Cross Robert Lee & Associates 1520 - 140th N.E., Suite 200 Bellevue, WA 98005 TRANSMITTED THIS 5th day of February, 1991 to the following: Mayor Earl Clymer Councilman Richard M. Stredicke Don Erickson, Zoning Administrator Lynn A. Guttmann, Administrator Members, Renton Planning Commission Jim Hanson, Development Services Manager Gary Gotti, Fire Marshal Ronald Nelson, Building Director Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Jay Covington, Mayor's Executive Assistant Transportation Systems Division Valley Daily News Utilities System Division Pursuant to Title IV, Chapter 8, Section 15 of the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 P.M. March 19, 1991. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is ambiguous or based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for a review by the Examiner within fourteen (14) days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific ambiguities or errors discovered by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record, take further action as he deems proper. An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Chapter 8, Section 16, which requires that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk, accompanying a filing fee of $75.00 and meeting other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection or purchase in the Finance Department; first floor of City Hall. The Appearance of Fairness Doctrine provides that no ex parte (private one-on-one) communications may occur concerning pending land use decisions. This means that parties to a land use decision may not communicate in private with any decision-maker concerning the proposal. Decision-makers in the land use process include both the Hearing Examiner and members of the City Council. All communications concerning the proposal must be made in public. This public communication permits all interested parties to know the contents of the communication and would allow them to openly rebut the evidence. Any violation of this doctrine would result in the invalidation of the request by the Court. Renton Village Assoc arcs (Callison Partnership) SA, CU-078-90 February 5, 1991 Page 14 The Doctrine applies not only to the initial public hearing but to all Requests for Reconsideration as well as Appeals to the City Council. DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED . REVISED MITIGATION MEASURES ' - ' '' DECEMBER 21, 1990 PROJECT: . . Village Place North PROPONENT: Renton Village Associates s • ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST: ` ' ECF-07e-90 • APPLICATION NUMBER: ''CU;SA;V-078-90 , DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: -Applicant seeks: 1) site plan approval for development of a new 260,363 square foot office/retail sales building (with a conditional use permit to address the fact that this complex, proposed to be ten stories/133 feet in height will exceed the height limit allowed for the structure under the Zoning Ordinance; 2) site plan approval for construction of a five level (1396 space) parking garage to supplement the existing 261 spaces to be retained;3) site plan approval for renovation (including partial demolition) of an existing'retail center now of a new the lect property e roadway toaserve the devend for ilopmentryon of The areas; and 4) a variance for the construction private proposed development also includes improvements to existing on-site amenities (e.g., landscaping; ingress/egress routes, and parking). , ' A second phase of this project is to be'proposed for development at a future date; this phase is tentatively' planned to Include 115,000 square feet of office/retail space. The City will require that Phase II undergo complete environmental and land tuse'hases are the het functions licati n submit, 1. The projects have been allowed to be separated because p . ' LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Renton Village Center/South Grady Way . RECOMMENDATIONS: The Environmental Review Committee issued a Determination of Non-Significance—Mitigated with the following conditions: 1. The applicant shall,'In order to address,aesthetic impacts, revise the landscape plan to in lude e more significant landscaping around the southwestern facade of the five story p g.g g order to soften Its apparent bulk, with a conceptual plan to be approved to the satisfaction of the Planning/Building/Public Works Department and the Fire Department prior to public hearing for site plan/conditional use review 'and a specific plan to be approved to the satisfaction of the re epartment prior to suance of site Planning/Building/Public aingon/bu ld ng permWorks Department and the and with landscaping to beiinsplled prior to issuance of a Certificate preparation/building p of Occupancy. ' • 2. The applicant shall, In order to address light/glare impacts, prepare a solar glare diagram for those hours of the day on the equinox, summer; and winter solstices when the angle of reflected sunlight is at an angle of 30 degrees or less'with the horizon, in order that staff can ascertain whether . reflected glare is likely to Impact 1-405 or Grady Way traffic. This diagram shall be submitted to the Development Planning Section at least two weeks prior to public hearing, so that staff can ascertain whether mitigation measures should be recommended.to the Hearing.Examiner for light/glare management. , 3. .The applicant, in order to address transportation system impacts, shall: , a) directly provide improvements proposed for the Grady Way Benefit Zone, to the satisfaction of the,Transportation Systems Division, prior to the Issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy for this development; OR b) make a contribution of $436,758.32, to the (pending) Grady Way Transportation Benefit Zone, prior to the Issuance of site preparation/building permits. 4. The applicant, In order to address local transportation system impacts, shall provide Improvements to the south leg of the intersection of South Grady Way and Lake Avenue South, including: a) designated travel lanes as presented on the site plans submitted by the applicant (dated October, 1990): and b) improvements to signalization (e.g.,.equipment relocation) at the Grady Way/Lake Avenue intersection to ensure safe, efficient functioning tq those designated travel lanes. These plans shall be approved by the Transportation Systems Division, prior to the Issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy for the subject development. mitmeas-1 ovements 5, The applicant, in•order to address local transportation system I P h tsodium vapor units) along•t ee to street lighting (replacement of:mercury vapor lighting unitssouth'side of Grady Way South:eXtendlncifrom•Lake Avenue to.the eastern boundary of the site,to - the satisfaction of the Department, prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy for the subject;development., . • , g. • The applicant, In order to address local transportation system Im oast conducteds. shall m baake a the City ton 11. the amount of$4,000.00 as a fair share payment toward a study determine-the feasibility of improving,'the Grady Way eastbound right turn lane (to open this lane . � up to through traffic from Rainier Avenue to Talbot..Road): and 2) determine the feasibilityili of Improving the intersection-of Talbot Road South/South Grady Way, thtouph improvements (e.a., .curbs,•signalization,,elimination of right turn trap at the.south lea of the lntersection). This .contribution should be provided to the satisfaction of•the Transportation .'Systems'Divislon prior to the issuance of the first site preparation/building permits for the subject • development. In the event that this study determines that improvement Is feasible; and the City. elects to install modifications,the applicant will be called upon to provide a fair share contribution to this Improvement, (with the maximum fee assessment sed portion the of the fair share2873 `co E,'esti onte for this development)with the cost of the.study creditedas a p ion 7, The'applicant shall, in order.to address transportation system impacts, provide pool systems, Management Plan, including (but not limited to): a) provision pool/car . preferential.,parking for HOVs, fee-for-parking plan for employees, subsidized bus passes, public transit and`ride-sharing Information'materials, a bus shelter, "kiss-and-ride" facilities, bicycle'lanes; bicycle parking plans, and a fair share contribution to a study exploring the feasibility of implementing a shuttle:service to the site from the local.residential community; b) a system/fees • ' for monitoring of 'the..TMP' to .determine its level of functioning and to make necessary modifications (such as relocation.of,:preferential .parking);11 be developedpto the satisfaction of the tion schedule to • serve the new,office/retail complex. Facilities plans pd to Issuance of siteh Planning/Building/Public . :Works, Department and METRO, prior preparation/building permits., . Service plans shall 'be developed to the satisfaction of the • Planning/Building/Public Works Department and METRO; prior to issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy. Facilities and services shall be implemented at the time of occupancy of the'first structure. . • (Note 7.1: .If, after having had 'in'place an 'effective TMP for two years, the applicant can demonstrate the need for additional parking, he canrequest ref ks ase of st Administrator es release parking. lons shall be the responsibility of the Planning/Building/Publi • or'all of the parking places held in reserve.) 8. .The applicant shall, In order to address transportation syste emept cts o andtWe y public safetercent y, provide ro 1432 parking plan which includes, but Is not limited to: •a) placement - , parking spaces required'for the office facility in reserve (with the reserve parking spaces to be shelled off on the top level,of'the parking garage); b) reserved parking areas on the roof of the . • garage;with landscaping, seating and a jogging trail in those reservedd visitors are to ); ofice establishment x of a system for assigning parking for retail consumers, vendors a to outside areas and the lower level.of the garage, with signage indicating those spaces which are so reserved and restricting parking to specified periods; d) construction of load/unload areas next to' , the skybridge at the second level of the garage; e) establishment of a system for assigning upper 'levels of the garage to employees, with signage indicating those areas which are so reserved, and with a security system '(controlled access, lighting, emergency service _phones, etc.); and f) provision of'a total of 29 handicapped.parking stalls to.'serve employees, consumers and visitors -- • with those spaces serving the office building to be adjacent to the skybridge and those spaces serving the retail area to be immediately adjacent to the retail center. These plans shallPo be established In 'concept, to the satisfaction of Planning/Building/Public Works, • Department and the Fire Department, prior to the public hearing for site plan/conditional use review. Specific plans shall be approved to the satisfaction of Planning/Building/Public Works,.the Police Department and the Fire Department, prior to the issuance of site preparation/building permits;and shall be installed prior to issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy. (NOTE 8.1: The applicant is encouraged to Install a hydraulic elevator in.the parking garage for the convenience/safety of employees,visitors and vendors.) . 9. ' The applicant shall, in order'to address Impacts.to earth and storm water management impacts, develop a storm'drainage. plan-and flood protection plan (including elevation of.all structures a minimum of two feet above the flood plain and providing, compensatory water storage areas on • site), based upon the Surface and Storm Water Management Ordinance.- The conceptual storm water management plan must be submitted at least two weeks prior'to the public hearing for the project and approved by the Storm Water Engineering Section in advance of that hearing. A specific storm water management plan shall be approved by the Storm-Water Engineering Section prior to issuance of site preparation/building permits. - mitmeas-2 (Note 9.1: The applicant may elect to,address storm.drainage management exclusively through on-site retention/detention or may develop a plan for routing water to the Panther Creek Wetlands. If the wetlands are to receive water from this site,the plan for conveyance and/or deposit must be • approved by the State. Departments of Fisheries and Ecology,- the Army Corps and related , agencies. The Storm Water Engineering Section will take responsibility for coordination of plan , review with federal, state and local agencies, as necessary.) 10. • The applicant shall, in order to address Impacts to earth and storm water management; provide a "hold harmless" agreement which acknowledges that the City has informed the applicant that the subject property is located In an area which may be included in an existing/altered 100 year flood plain, and that the applicants have decided to proceed, at their own volition, thereby waiving their rights to hold the municipality liable for any flooding and/or for any damages to property or person arising from such flooding. This,document is to be approved by the Storm Water. Engineering Section and the City Attorney, and to be duly recorded prior to the issuance of site preparation/building permits: 11. The applicant shall, In order to address on-site recreation impacts, provide a plan for Interior recreation areas (with shower facilities in the office/retail building, for use by,employees ). This . plan shall be approved, In concept, by Planning/Building/Public Works prior to public hearing for • • project review. Specific plans 'shall be approved, by the Planning/Building/Public Works Department, prior to issuance of site preparation/building permits; facilities shall be installed prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for the building. 12. The applicant shall; in'order to address community recreation impacts, provide: a) -a plan for development and Implementation of off-site 'recreation improvements to the satisfaction of.the Parks`and,Recreation Department; OR b) make a voluntary contribution of $20,000.00 to the • development of community recreational.facilities (Comprehensive Parks Plan; Master Trails Plan), In order to mitigate recreation impacts. In th"e event that the applicant opts to provide off-site 'Improvements directly, these shall be Installed prior to issuance of the first Certificate' of . Occupancy.. In the event that the applicant prefers to make a contribution; fees shall be provided prior to Issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy: • 13. The applicant shall develop a Construction Management Mitigation Plan that addresses: a) hours. . of operation, b) hauling routes, c) 'staging areas, d) employee and contractor parking, e) erosion control,f) the disposal of hazardous materials associated with soils remediation/construction, and g) signage identifying construction area's In order to facilitate timely provision of emergency services..A conceptual plan shall be submitted at least two weeks in advance of public hearing for the complex, and shall be approved by the Planning/Building/Public Works Department and Fire Prevention Bureau prior to that hearing. Specific plans shall be approved by the . Planning/Building/Public Works Department and'the Fire Prevention Bureau prior to Issuance of site preparation/building permits. .(NOTE: In conjunction with land use review, staff may recommend modifications to site plans and landscaping plans to achieve full compliance with Code requirements and additional conditions to ensure adequate functioning of the development (e.g., covenant for joint use of parking areas and amenities, landscaping maintenance bonds.) (NOTE: The.applicant.will be required to make all Code mandated off-site and on-sitte Improvements, including sidewalks, curbs, gutters, street lighting, utility lines, and utility system fees prior to issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy.) . • • mitmeas-3 • • - -- i • • • . . .. , ---• ,...-s-4.6.-.-1.. .......---- ...--- .. . -71 I il 11,31171 . :rr.".arr; L . I. • ,. . .tri r...iii mr111115 CM 7 ' ' _L,4 IL5 / i' .....„..,•\-, MI\ :,*:'..; p I i , • I • I .., _ .-- ' ) ._, , •• . . . •i .... . ' •1' '-7:1•1111:C'f,,:lt...: •134 ' <1._)77... ...A ; • ---; L)113 ; ' 1_1. .- \ •-.—.-----.. -4177 .411/444•••41 „ : . 0 ...r il .7--- 1.1-0- -1 \---••:-. , , , . .777" :-4. r VIO !ir, )) . F--- e•- .i pi : . Am.? +. ): • 1 w ) \ ,._ .!; z_ 60,1(-2 , k 3 ' •. • • pe 1\\ . ...IT R . • a „ 0_ ,-::: ., , • --T.:: . 04_,... ! . AL1:' ' •" ',2-i r'r11' 7-1%j '1—. .. : .;j1=li'-a ' " - • 9` '• \ . . :1 ‘ 13 \ if K4aTt, 37 \ - ts\ ii ; ....—• ,14. . 1.....cct- _iip, . . r 21 _...•• _...9, 111. 51 E 7 1 :2•-:-7 Trt) ; .71: \ .., ; ,,,,,,cr ,4••••• -' -•-• ft.- 1 - , ; R-__p_ \ \ \ ' ,--' 111:1, I Mir --ti ''r-'- '4. , I=L:i ii -2.7: 1%, \ \ \ . , ,?:,,L=41 o 3 /1 e. • r-17.•: r- , -. . -- '. ---4,cktit-e9i---' -,,— —41 ppg , I ! T 11 \ \ mr...-ou L im , , ,_i , . . - :::„,) _ilma.,„c. Efilt.. _ . . 3. ...e.J.,..„7., ... . i J' .., .,',1 ----"-- . f", 14 \s .... \ \ . li- • , . : Eli_ : ,,;_45:r 17-i--'. . .,, , i, ,,•-• , \ . I , , . , . i, .. . .. . 1 ., 1 , . \ \\ p \•\.. s .ii .%‘ Ft.. .,,i!11.—..,..‘..„.,,,1-,.;,I1I,• ...r"=momompl1r,i,, , B-•1•t•l—.a----•. • • r- • 2 47 ' ' • .\- i . .4.. I..., • I. ' k, \ • . . i . 2,, i ! • 1 lin. , ,,, - , . "i.e. . 1 ,c, \ .. • A.... • . . ..,1 42-' . .• 1_ 01 k4- . • L.-. 1 .. .z• :..1. ... . . , ,0 cl I. ,:;14.0. 1 . • 7 1 • 4 4 ..1. :::;;;; .,.1 v qc?".11 ,---- • ' - . ... I i_I , • Imo, .., " •"•• ,i . . , 1 • 1.1' .:;'' 1 l': ----- ' .• ' - . 1 i • ,--v .---.- .. I\ . I . . , -.: . • . . ---- 1---I ' 1 --- FeFil • "---• .' 1 • 1 , . . 7.------..;.•' • I 1 . I ' srre- , . •(( g. . . . . . . ,. . ._ . . _ I, : 1 . , ,„.. . I . . :. .:. 11 1 / . • . , • .P. . ,..,... 1 . • • , . • . , 1 \ ___ . ,. poPv i :,....• • . ...f A 'INTL K" - i IL . ./ ..,,...--sio.7.rp,....;¢20::411.',1111..,;.. s2r7loromme„- :11— IV1----'"m"..'411141:1111 61.11\ 1:11111 • • . R- 4 . ..., . .. 4 . n . . .........:....... I iri--4-t s . 1 , mem cm,. iL.El. 4 •-. d k 111 IL :7 /4A\9 1 1 r _E.. P-4 1,_• , . , . . I ' . 0 ., name A • . . . . ' . . .. Renton Village Associates , ECF:.SA:CU-078,,90 • . • • APPLICANT Renton Village ASSOci atesiGallisnn . TOTAL AREA 14+•,acres Partnership PRINCIPAL ACCESS South Grady Way; Lake Avenue EXISTING ZONING B-1 , Commercial Use . EXISTING USE Vacant land; commercial use PROPOSED USE office building • COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN Commercial Use COMMENTS •Located at Renton Village Center/South Grady Way • . . . . . • • . •••.., • . • • ...... V MA VS..1.12M1 ILLAGE . • . .. --.";.., ,ti.k.fruct‹.. . • •• 18-7 '"--------- PLACE • -..----••>....,...„..-----.; ,,,%.. .. EIIi ... . ••.5.1.11.11133....11 ........ NORTH • ....- .., H Itc-111. !).r.cc, IA`..'s AN'.•f.w.i- . _ WHGTO = '.. .0---:7•44-1.- . , •- ;;,-,k,-..- . p: - ,\ . . I, 0 :::-.."?.'.....:::-..:7" .L.4.::.:-...:-Z•• E . ,,---- - •-• LAY,5.t1/4\1&.12. . . "---'-,,•'' . ‘‘•:, __.-- ,. • -\ . __............. • •• .- -.-> .---. /---iN\ii.,,g.." . TI:' I • . • . • • ' M..-7.14.- Caliison „ . •77•.:ND M:17i.lf,.;tv. ,_ ,, .. , -...a.!..:m.:::•,....„....„ .....—_...., og.A.Py 1...)Ay •-•si.- EF.--- . . . - (-.7,---.:e=r-.-f-a... -. 2:-..=-% i: '''' ,••„__./.._/ ,W1585K\rh .-ISY7-='..._. ' . • 1.^.7 : ''''''' (-- .1•-q.'-' 1..-'-?--:;.-7. .- . . . . . . .!.;;;:-,.t7.--"7-...";•t."'-•••.. ...'-...4",_.,-•-•,;---:;:_./. :7•,:1-.:1;;z:-.. .•;---,:. '..:-.:. .-----...- :-.:"Z:.--'...7-:- . . .. ' . 44.---.-- ',/•60 r::"...1..P-g... . .. ,.4.PA.,.........--1.--= - ___-•;,. ..-„,•_4•4 . ; v.?:-.:.--4, • • .434.01. \••• •:.a . f--- •- --ic..4`----•-•A---•. .z- ...--- ,,----•• ____ ..Z. • • . ==.--- c....r..— • s • •IiJr.irf);Av-. / :' "70g:Mi0z001/40.- ••=''7.'.t7.-'- -- "- . -27A-rv.,!-"-.-!:-7: 2 4 . - -..---, :i.....!.F.,7i::•:::.::-:,, 7.1-"-•:::,:..,...".",..'..... •- • • ' . ,. . . . - • - , • • - • ' ' cyt.: it.,,, -EM e 1 ' ...7.....-5T'''. • • 0:114'f---;• "--''''"'-' ------ . •-. .. ... ... .. . '' -; i : ..-.., 't.q..1 'At' %a-•': • )°M" ; ..---2-,V-rf•.:7..'.• "*.--- . - -: I 1 • 1,0.0.,, 1---' '-7-• •:.. : ., ! •_-:-.:•.:.•:;:.:::::- • . t 1 . •-.1.1;',', 2. . i•-31.4..:::--i ,.- ' , • - ' (_, . . :. \:-,--- -'—'''''--"--- -...--.FF.F.''.:.::: ' '''''ilt?" • . _• . .. . . — . 1 1 1 • •'1.) %, i • ....I\'." ., . ., . '• . . .. i --g• _ 1 , - )..4", , • —- t =tn.- • - , OVral r ;, ifi 1.•-••.m..-.:t.•::-..r...5..r.r..e:E'r...- ..-7.,=. ' . . . ff. 11, .......7. i _.• 7;I : i _L. -- - - VILLAGE PLACE NORTH eZ ...V%• •O PA." iix' Er: K7.7 -...... . . -- .. .. .. ' __,- „....„. 1; , .. ....... . .• _ , • , , , . . . ........ •‘,..,....!_.„ • ..-.....:"..:;-::-=L.--.....=;.2-1-..:.---==L-.::.:.•_...... • • • - ...,„„,„,... PARKING GARAGE _A . • . ..4 • ,,-----, ' . • i • •.-m •:- ...v. ''' *-: .. ....=:-.7.:).. ... - - -i . . ____. • - I . - ''. ' • ..............,....:F:::-:".:-.:7;•::-.7."-- _ ._ . • . . . ... . . •-T F i - -- • ::,•:.:::-....:-..,-: .::.::::..:-..:..::::.:::-..F.:...-,._ _. ._______. - -- - ---- -- . • \ ,f74 •/--\, • ' / I. ------- . 1 . . 1 ''w•- .0',f, '_ ,-.•, - . . • '"1,2 • .•."••-su -, ',•- ik --- - - •-- --- .., ( ' ---- >2• ....:... -----, • ..-.-':::::.:::.=.-::::::::'''''".7.7..•::-::::.:". • :::_ir.:::-:7:7-27,I':•?...1::::•:. :;•-•::T.-•:---;•••• . _____ . • '•\ • 4N.r.44 . , - * ,.-4 . 03 . t • <,,... ,(:`i"---- 1 . - - - '.....J , . •.._„..,....._2\....._.; •..fij,....._."‘..._.. --.__./,..-/-S ;6 6 6 \,...._., -• • ::'.:7.77.:-:•::::::.::=.:::.:;::::.::::::';.7' - •------- . • '.•'''‘i.:.' - •._../.----- • "-:.i:.:•.."..7:•:'...-•:'''"''''''''''':::7-4--'7=-•- ,. . ______ __ —-- . -1--, .,Y • • • -— •• •-- - •-- ••--- ' .71l.".:::::::•':::.':':rly::.:-T..:;:F.:.—- ••0‘ ,6., •••,, 7: •' , _.....____. __._._ . . ,./..„,...,,,. , . ...._..., , ., ......,.._____..._....._.......„ ._. . ..,/ • <-•,...-,- ---, ,-- _ • .It4$.,... ..,,,,4, ___; . - ,,.. • . '. ..-, '- • . ., ' . 1:-t• if ... .. .. 1---.-1 r— -- .• 7(0-4.... .... - .. ..,.-...;, -,.. .--- . e...,,,, • r-r,..-,-4..,,,f,>---,:-.FT.:3-in--•--,.,-‘•- • 1 ---1 ----- - .‘-'''--5-----'-':'l-.. -^'• ... ' -117- '`------'7':-.:'''---:--:.--- . Int.z.trt.,,,,-..,„..........- ..--,‘.....••,•••••••••• _ 1 -.•-----1 t -..— --' '; -- - -----• -- - .=...... . • . 2,... i.-.-,•-• . • „9..-,..•....,-,. .:.,....1...,.vmd..... •• k ' .....=..- - _ '-` "...14.ZC-....cr • c..." ' —1.....r`=;.•ie..'f' -!Z...7...;.t.LT-.,4...,..1 7.11: . - --•- -. . _ . ._-__. - -. -.., .• •••""''''''" .t.'..i...`.; • t"' ............ • .-,. -•' T.-,--;:f•:-.":-....-....-. LANDSCAPING - '•A',74.1::,, ,:;•-,.....,•.-:.:.,,,, SITE PLAN • '''''-'11.,•.,7..:::: t.:•!•'41`..., Lic...3-.0+ i•zo-ii..... . : . • . CIJX6REgkl : 1 i..416 q.-.'VO!--.1 filkt.b . .-...., . . \ CeAmcat,c.INAihr-11 _. ATTACHMENT#27 L-1 . —.------- 1_...__ • . . . • ..--. _----- ---- . ' h1AgiuM --- ,„-- , VILLAGE \-- ,--- , ,--- ,, , -_. ---- „,-- i ...---- . _ - NORTH .,, _ icilA. 1110 fANC kr.:)1(1C6 --•-• .,_ -A.. no r- it)a, •:0 •• ../...0.„„/ \\ \ :.7_. _---__,., , .,__I ,- RavroN.WASHLVGTO!C 0 . , RENTON‘ILLACEASSCCLVIT.5 , - ............."--' :'• „. . ......\\ .. . ' .. . • C.':: •750,1D HtfilJP,5111 . . .•• .--4"-• ..--,-- ' •- •-: ::::':----- i i • . ..... .--- _.-' I' ?..''' ' -• ' -----•'•,1-4-• `-`.. • ..s .,, . . • . 66110M5K`i -.s"r-; ---,cz.....,..„.,.. _• ,... _ ,.. •!-, i , ... orstria: 1.37/4 ,/A _____,.- _....- .. ...___ . ::-•__-- , .i. • . . . . . . , . • ..___-- „ •••,--....„.: . , ,....„. .,..... ,.... " . .., - \\ . ilINfliklAy — : r.~..z.— .._.._...........__. ,Ii 7.4 :.; _i ..,:. ---..,- I i i _ • ._.... .__ s,1- • 7/././/v1.- /..//7 . .,........„—. • ----.:-.7-.. -) 1 • lbr /-17. •'‘isi'li?- :---•,(.,....„.---•.:, 1 1. • If.-------— _,-;:: •-..- aglfal •, I st,: \: : - --.- ,: . 0 ,sv., ,.,...\ \,,.. -,\• . • _ .........- •:. 1!•.• ... _...-- -.1-;,..-0......... • _ . 1• c, , . , • i• ' • ; ! • ,, . ./ • .r. ..ei...,. 'tr.' 4 1....-. • . ..•- 7- • •:.A. •....... r‘g•!:.!. • • (.7 ) r.,.. -.:iik .- r- , _---- .- -- -.-......T• •,....., ---. 'N . .. : . . • :•.. . •-:--, .—'7, pi•;.•,. ...-.-] L I. . • ..._ . ._.. _ . \i‘,..,5e, '''.,', s • . _. • . ., i,-e'S ••,.,", '..., . . a i.,..4\ ..e ., 4...t. 4, 2". r ' \'..\.......:.\‘.\...\''.`\\s,\:.\..ST \ ..\ '\\':\ \\"• '.NS-. i.: .. _... — , ,1, , .1 •• C 0 •? . •._J L.., ._J L_. -I • - --;- . :. — .,''.2- -- — -\--79-— / I. ... .:.;"1 ‘ \:- I i '..--.... -- ' • • . _.__ . ..- ...-.... .C./ • — ' s,\ N.:, . 1 ......,._.., ._... i '.-\••\\ 1 —... •••;; ------___. -- ..--:--,\. '••f!....:"..t. , ,__- .._S ..\ I ...„... ............ . I• • • ..C-i;:c.t...!..'". 7 i'. .•••• '. •• /1 i :,---- • '. :-\ ...2 •-.,, \I 1:5-'-•fs-)-- J-.)] _-. . _ ,--j-- • ----',.:-7_. ) •,i- ..... .,_ . • 1..._ -\ '''•--. .....z.'..."7,:..... • '-. .----. :-.°.ra.7..-`'';... _____ ,--., 'Id:,-.... ,.......u. v.,....s...4 ...•74 .... -.-- ---, LEGEND ' ! .„.... • ,,- .. \I .., .• . •....,••••• . • i'l i I j '•.---- •- • -' ' ... . •- - - - ...-. ..- ', ....; . ......... •-- . . ... . ''-.. -• . . , ..--._...• gi) g61`1 --,. . _. _.......•,17___.; .,•••••_•_.-1.-, 1 • 1 NO rrAfok ft-i‘c& 1 , . .. ,•r VC..0. . &P.M j °R&M •----:- . ' . . . in........,•...••••••••• ' . . . • • . • . . . • . - . . . VILLAGE PLACE NORTH , . eoet.0,114 ni. • • ....--. .—t--- ..-.-=.1.4:1=EF:=..r..=.:11. . .- :. .--..• ....r..,=. ,...3.-.::::=:.- • .1 . I RENTON.WASHXNaTal iimilliluMpEliallEMINIERIMIII.M111 iimEMINIMINNMmoMEMNIIMMIIII .:: .1. ...... .=1111:11110 FENTON MUM ASSOW:113 . .VKIP'..,.. 7:7:7-_-'-'i- •-. .-- -:-: •-- . -:— .,_..,..,._ ......1.,..-..,,,--.. . I 1.•- ..°9=7, emmonimnomma•1 l r..,-,....-:r cave. i-.- :- % - •— .".:..m ...immmommimmiummom. Imo,. ...1... ..i.:K. 'T i 0 e r i 1--- • ummtimmimorellonmommmm i , 1 Unison , , . • ---.--. 111 . ............... ..= ••..1 .. --IMMI1. -"Ii"I"li --.M -'- - M111 .....-..../... .;-•-rii- -.lidlilli ---11•1' .• '.. .i. . ,........ . ..•..... . ....."7!.., I ... ..--i i . P..1-, kW, -Elarceev ALtoim444 ..7.7.:-... . 4-1 ,i.I .7--- ''........-1.1.-.T-":' .:... • 1-evee".3 &,/xyn....c. IIMMIIHI 4-i FINNII..1 .. ......__- . ...m... =EC .S.:-.F17,-,:i.:.F.::::-•*.::".. -.v. • 1".•.• ... ' .. . • pV4:1== I • • •• i I MIMI --.1••• • MMMMMMilMEMMMnMMIM6iiiillli4iEtnE IT, - i..,., I - 1 *-. ... l'.....1 SA 1 , . V•17::'...... i....l':""..... . ....72 -4-1-1-1 -- I I •,-..4.: Mim---- ..- , 1 - 1 ......„ •• 'rl-4-7:1:-1-1-1 .=-.=I 1 I ------- .......... • . . !SIMI 7MINI.111=11MMIIMMIIIMIMII=MB I ' . . . - r: :C--P-1=-1;1=1:4-•-•----. I i I I IN/ --------. ., = . '• ' . . . • i Iiipigif.: ........-....6,.. .., ..... _........,..; RatIngT N.. .r.-.... .1 i... ...,.!.. , I I 1 I . MtI - I.— ----,-. -,.---4,-,..ii-C2- 1.--t•tr_ml.,_,.rAtsial .....r..--..---.2..,,,,,-..rtrives",....mIrma .1-tit..:,47--. . 1 Pre-.."C C."."../ C,11. 71,.e.ergerer e.fetroc, 7%.!e awe .NORTH ELEVATION 4g TO.4bAteROM EAST ELEVATION f Ceee... ed_.4.4.7'.4.... ca-swc. . • . ' . . . . . ' . . 0.4,-6,....7 ' 7LE 2..._ ....... • ea..r.e.V.•r.... .-: .- — ,..... •. . . FT"----. q0 ii•.„:., ... :.-- ... r....r.2....74,===...-.,,,r- ..,..... . . I 1111!M PM , , .-,--,•_....1-.-,,I.,,,,, , _ _ 11:112411-1-1-1---, 1-3,1- . .. . - d -' • •• • .-...-,444=q--17-----, 1-=:- M II . . . • 1 , 1 • --- ,____ .• .. .. . . • I.I-_14;:17:-1- I I. - Illmillmill, 1 4- - - ...;--...... —..---,...,--.,-------t:=:-_-. . I ' -•i.71 1 1 . • . .-T-....1_ • " _.. (Tr ._: v.:F..4.-...?.r.::r..... -- .... - ... .. - .• - . . • - . . - ' ' • ____ • . %EMIR .• - - _• 1 I I • 4 4 k I . __.. ..._ ..._„..)._____ ..... ' I - MN . _..— _ .. _ • . . . . .. . ... 1 I * -— I I \ t 6 I I , - .... - ete-e.e3r c.a., •—— ri-----1 . —...io.-- - I ._..' ,C.........e.--4---7" 1.r-1-:NZ:.7. .----..- . A 1 I ------- .....E., --.: -.-_ _ .. -'__11.4.4i/-74;-"Z.,.® ' -H.-'.E.J.--7..r.- - -.. ., .1r-7=4.7=== ----.7-7 - = '-MS-. . ...- . i , 1 • . ME _ I I I I — . i I t. I "excel....0.,ni-e .7...-:--- . • . • . '':-':'.FE747.77:---L;-=':'"';'''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''' f"'"' - . MIL= -- n A in _. ' 1 -.-- 1 -lc.Mil 1 •Itt= r2=-ImP.INIMMENCOM - ltemintb7'.' - ,,, . .--.1 . . • •--r-q--e .....,..,--i-4 Et-r--- .F.,a zn" it' •-=F..i'ir_.s=;-744-...tv.=per.:_iptinga— . • ,.., """=',i 7.:.27-: LiF.'....;.-.;:: ;...•••r...---i----. r.-;.-----47..:;---) cr...==:;, 7.F. :F=::::=cu.=r...r.c===ces====== — . n m • pi: :::„,..... ... - _ - eat- na..e...iar Mx.. SOUTH ELEVATION .0 No2771 MV. Q3 WEST ELEVATION --- • . • . , N a • . . . • OTES. 51 ZOL.0 , • . ELEVATIONS ' Ca4r-RETE ri,IEZ ~nu" ilA.,,,,,, , 1-11+7' crea-f-e.vd,e.. 4..40 7z,DE sz-eyrn_y . • R.C.9..xCnve e.u.,E.-4..e.epV• . . ANre-e,liov•ni_e-77, BE A4-M.. Helm 3.47.1047m • . ep e.‘,..E 45y r. . . • ' . ,7./..34,Pire.VA7E . 81,0)7.04. 6.8.10 . . „..-.. . '... ... . . • . . . . iogyvi7:. re.BE 094,WTIED ........ ... 1-1.4Ir,WY-bc/4. . A4 1. ... ATTACHMENT#10 . ,—..------ . •. . . • . VILLAGE .. IS]'4 .-6 I16'-0' 1 30-O. 3W-V 1 ' ,0_.' I Zp-6' 1 all-O. 3d-0' t ,d_P 30-P 1 ,6-6'�,b PLACE _ I _ i I 1 i I i 1 i NORTH i _ • • • • - i •—._.—a a • a RENTON VO.AEEHASSOMITS b r._ I • • C II'ison • b A • el • . TYPICAL FLOOR PLAN • I , . j� I , , 1 I I I I• =f Tom— , 1 l TI R�SSENOER O wv oEF ! I Imo' 1 ' r I — - -- 1 4 _• 1 I 5 1 i 1 I . . I 1-, i-- • • I 1 I POTENTIAL RESTAURANT �W� OFFICE i I _ ....._ • .1R18UCTERRACE ,I ' Iy AI.,AN. Fr ?/ .----- II- 1 'T [ 4 �I lr-I E I.ECN. -I _. __ • 1 T T { 1 �..6.� v r.. —E 11 i_�_.. rot — - r' R PASSAGEWAYl I t I • F 1 ,---R. — d -- L________J SERVICE CORRICOR I • SERVICE AREA - _-- 1 1--t �•-.I PETAL I RETAIL a RETAIL a PETAL fl RETAL 6 l; RETAIL 6 PETAL 7 RETAIL 6 PETAL 9 I T row. I . . . —1---:—i—i — l _ r. • r --.=-------t--=----- ---- ----�----- "--- ( .. � FLOOR PLANS GROUND FLOOR PLAN e O1o91.a* 6-6-TN - . _ . •. . ATTACHMENT#8 A2 - PLACE NORTH I. RooF DECK RENTON.WASHLNGfON E.E.\TDK\a1AGE Acy%wrE3 LL‘ IIQ0IlQ F._EIEVAIpI PENTHOUSE 1 AECHANCAL E I ' .r �1 I . ,; 1—\_.J . . _ N;4M lj�fLSN W/-. f • I� rues• _ _ T_ . .rs' .a...... CANOPY ROOF PLAN I, ROOF DECK - i'LIFi'PS Ia">7 AVE. / ,,F. . , 0 , i_i, ,_ . a ...ems. Eli ID • • TENTH FLOOR PLAN • FLOOR PLANS L c37.,t 6 a.+o ATTACHMENT#9 A3 ?AR kii N) & GA fa_A G. E...... • -. __: VILLAGE - PLACE NORTH 0.-ED RFNPDN,WASF:111470N 9.5 : 4 7a ts+rttr nawts....DM= Ay/eC.S 1Nd A. t �� ( • �' .,�rfnfly�r ' _ .. . .wt i � ,.`,lam r amenommilorelitimm 1 il' t '93j t \-� • .�.y \I' - �. Ja�J A.`�{-j��p; ilk' iiii ^S .f. .`44 Fa '(? � A +k f.: a �..�.'e:...q is '/. /.:!', � . a1 `....1... .;:..o -_ .-y: '.` =�...- _1V/Ld4A,rn.E / e1.�, s�sw. --- O reef<ewgrroN Nr•Y ar /O7E1 ON cos.,.. 1i7WCE LQ4'4E,7D ...we-4cm,T.cE/wwv.m 7E1c>ue '7 E 17 rmee LKPN4E7e 'A Elh 770.OM• bN 4•.e1=o.'4E 4 - Ur a o y 5 44a^Y q. -_( PIa95.rF m'imimm - l .=I •Asx`(_ \\\\'\\1D'\NNTkNN,x'\ n�l., 1/4s\lam- r�*. ` c ti \•. tr\r •,v'h` ml. N�/Ay lS iLA'iTA/45. s e.... v gFi•rfar• ��1�! `.� �I1lII��119 t�i If ...... _..A....�aR4. ...,a..r:,, In\ ..14 t4ON.`11�1' gPrF1A/A'roc -- — r it/r71 h :.,.- -I-_ �! c?IP(PtI1i; '» L� pat- i � t "r, u iq 7o.,x —— u ���v tararst� it a as ,..�a� j.} Ip- 2 �1 7'_ �r.y i 4,..::- ,.1.��•�. r41,- .--• -- �,m/ 2 VrMoN ____ _ ®No,plh EIEYA-TION e yh'-,iw^ - - %' b' —— ___—I- r 1 `T r,�nF./o.a•N , I 1 .b./,H.N i 1 7r%NLE L11"K'tE7D 1 7 E sew I •�•-.• M u4 gm,0/.1. wrvQ.b nwN BAY I ro<ca tW 77e..E I ..aCZ>r .v._...Was sec�- oaL.<Erw l 7xt : J. +v...i.c O 4w•wt E• 1 Uzi „@.4...., i _ . mmom r�^;.����� - _ -n. - •: t"-_ - . . _� :, %! GARAGE /� Jy .�, 7♦ . ELEVATIONS me.,.. �� 7[SrI S. r • 'J.�.� •# %- FI=- rJ — _ ... A e' • war--1- IYl1 �� y1 �..:k , I11 mayy,,_ �I ,t � �t • .�t;..1r.. ,i • -•- �( � .� •f _.:w 'R:' e4 e.o-go • srvBs.u.E•.eE- awr 4c ......••••••••••=r n611,r;...,,,,,,;,, A5 v • /cL�E Aa.rM Pr7 ATTACHMENT#12 ---`-`- rP.. .' '.........".". VILLAGE • PLACE . NORTH KEN-MS A'ASHCIGTON . PISTO.N r._w[ASSOL1w1ES . &A En' --• . -..v /\?...... V! Y V - !G V Callison- 11 ruu+oc0 - 76-It 1'1L - i p4 JP GN . / %o t0.0� ieK 6�L I i.• 2°NG. :- Nw- ty 0 ILT� j6 wv..Ip .so:e t m� SDI —— 4MCG 1^r/� . I i vocv.0E I•VA v' rlfi rii 1F' rt!3!- ye u=i �e',--..--.• _.a,,. f 1 I �.' I4_-„� 'Tr I •°---- w — P W 1 II I a I t n.QR) 7 £7x6"apt.. r`134 ,..I.I ^q,ee. 1_ I LY .) +Hns) �1� ec.,[.E .aa.w -r/=K \, v, - om - _ . . �) NiI i —— • • � = fd' Q [ 11 E 11 3e • C 71 e' ty.P.)(6F+'s)wa. t ...a) hkR tl.rv.ws 1.64.LrtY Pit. .... - o_wi Lose. Ma Me• RETML • PNtKJ A14 •—. En•�i1K. —' • \i.D.r. \ YL f8i.wlCD +wsr�,fy: • \\I I D 13 eV SUE,44.4e.IY RSERY6 i 11 IN E 'D47 S1MN°A.ts KTfn•.,M�-rS �r 9 oISltE IACYJ144 +- ��S GARAGE PLANS O LEVEL 6 PLAN OZ LEVELS 2,3,4,5 PLAN O GRADE LEVEL PLAN > y way. M11d 1.6o u.cs-e1N�Sib TSIN.41 00non rxro V!0 sro. 4_P.Gr 5ue•m4AL. Sro. ta,^�cr wY`D.a� Eot.Prav,Ol�we,-Q1E'EIS 4-4 141 '+ C-� Lam-Z I -7 14 Y71u42o.4 sO u.,44.t7 aw.E 165 06 144 P.�r�I.. b D' ll$C 4� 17_2 650.41L 51e e01.u..I L SI 11 .o,c s �CC,PP5 r 14,%.ouaGLf *4.1,4. I�-11 - • . ..6va S ws+ee C7 57 14+ 0 49 T lY 4ESC¢..0 0'."6 ••• iRML 71F DIS 101 u Y.e. •...-• . III 60.4‘23. IN tesE+'.,E ATTACHMENT#11 A4.5 SI G . . . . NORTH PLACEI OLIRLTAHGE il....4t......10 . I 0 T 4 1 0 EX•714,Co•ddevCnoN 1.-4,6 of tEXisr 4,-/C45 ' 7', BE Mo0,,ed"0. T ,,, ,• , 44,41- I I i NM 5fy,y ey ,6-E f - akst •I • 4 1 ,...,,r. 3..,g,-) I RENTON.WASHINGTON • • RE..TON VI/I.AGE —..• .--.,Z--.7-- Ird 4 to, ...e i k , Callison ___,_ —— — —.,1,,,,!*•.: i .... ..“... — ....---• ....—.rya.G.01.,401. • ...,e1.,*-77114 4orz-We.,To . P041-51.47#.1 171...E 0 ive,r ELEYNr/OA, RE•VAIN e/14.40 are:0,5E Wir—e' --- . • SYNTNETIl- PCO-37-e•e 0)/dTd-H. =L.— ?...."7:— .....7....._,._ :::',1".r..• ::::trans• ,,..i“q46XY'0 te.''': • ----•— _— • •c•••••••—• . (i) ( 1 C $eEe W Elk UW.M.,..710,1 ,,, •47 _ .4. 7y0. 3,r-4p...44anin i AI L.,4,44- FIX7v4.6- - . =-- • ... - ------ - - __ • 1 — =IIMININIMINIMI ______ 1.1 . . NI :::: :: :: no •• - ' :: ' •ft* . .I , b.. b4o., 77t-C-- • Ea. EA. Ed. . 1 •I''' • --• - -- ---- 4 I- l' 1 AVMS ON [ace. .._l___•••__•_. 0 . Sr CLEvw-doN I ... %JO.lice' >',V.ri/e-r-c PC.•51:5-....V..57E,./ 1-o Be'RAN,E, u4s7- 4.4.EV-e•---4E. , • Pootc.E24”/ (owe ON ON o,-,rde- dad.obvd. .. _. A451,40'55 c4E-•.•ro — -- . _ mAn.,.. Exe,"44. ....,.....----- • .x.s.,!eZe.coe--444.. . - . ,04447- 4.0.4C 1...NG.,kiew .......... SYNINErld. PaasaER...1y5xf2,-,) ? T ......•.!.....,,,• ? 11.P.E.VC.,*04 ' C1) N.,a.ralea- ..,..,,,,,,,,,......,,,,,,,! Ev.r.srat e.,4„..tne„,,,,,,e-r>,../ . 1 ..,.....„,. ,...:,, e h.z•o.c.. l're. •'." i 1 -).___,./ 1 -/- - --- •IP f_&--z-i.,.. I- - L.,...r-..,-1=r--- 4r. ..,......... • . .__ --__. - __.____ - •---,..) ,..,......,,..„.:-- ,_ .• STRIP CENTER ••O \4='," ,.L-.f" '' .. ELEVATIONS '' ---- .,:.';'..;1.. .,i '*Z.'.:. ',..:;;;;;7":....-...-4-7.-::: .nr'.:,'N.,,.- '.:-.?7e,.-,..k,,r":•' .. .,'-:- :,.._-__— . t —1 •... 5.:f...s,•.4IN .' ,,..,'--- —-- -• 42 ' •Arlitathafiti+Hi-fWH4-1. 4TFITRIPT PooLEW/ nix .*i. ..i-gi.4___ I eavbr-V.,• 4,4,-•••••,, I ,----,--..-- - 1' ,,,4,.. i .2,L.,,t,_ I. ro...ConAry .....05.5 OTN.,.......v..".tert•-o. ..1.2.1..'A_._1_- .._.___.?4e.t._____i_ a,twi ID ........ ..... ........-- 0 twEVr /D-Evit-naa/ A 6 1 YOWL," ATTACHMENT#13 ---____ --,------- . . - . . _ . ' VINIMPINIMIIMIIIIK .MEWL (A.Y.t Ng..'2. - • 0Af1t/a.AVE-. S . h.eV42)1 WM • •. I . _______ .. _____ , ‘11 2 • LN) 17 ••• • I *I\ T-' •, OTAIS CB .'"...-- ., / -• ii "TYP/CAL .• -___ • . , r , ... ..... • , __ ,- •____„ .. ., . . . \ , .11 • (---.. . . . ,:. i ., i.' - ..,...... . __...__ 1 .•. _____ 1 i r7 ,•\ . .,1\--------_________si II . . i Norlik ,.• : I ---.._.• Al : ( f. II • ,1 ....,„ -, C's•-- . t .. ... ,. -_ .--___.) , • v • • * .• - 1 '..---• -•-• s7 7, ) (-"-- ; • 1 , .•,..., i , i 1 1 . • ,..--..... 7 , ., . EXISTNG . r)1_,. / 8 • .-• -----":"----...„...._,/ • .f44%,,,.......X • I . / I FEMA 24.0 / $' •/ '._•• I ' :7-----' . -'---.. • ,- • GARAGE / . . • . i I . 0 .1 ; 1 . .• •‘•-......... , • / y -. i / 1 1 il . • : . •¢ l_./ / / • 1 . . ...-_, / . I 0( . (-- ,.: -•••_ _ I . / / / 1. / „• ./ ,,,,,.7r...... • A. ..:>;; . / ./ - .... 7 I , g . ! / •. UNDERGROUND • Li4Z-7.. -----...:- .1....1 /OFFICE/RETAIL , , g., •. --... , / / FLOOD COMPENSATING STORAGE 41"../ / . / / TOWER 1 Z i--. - -.... I I / . (FCS) ....,... I • ./ i...--__ • -,......p..... • i • / / i • 1 1 ! __ , i 1 ' f R(--- ---------- _,----____:i . .• RETAIL - ,. , I ' --1 1 • le I I T,,f„............• ,,,.. ..,--:.,,,,„,, I I .- •,_ i •-__ i .• i. -_ , -. . . • _-- • • • _. .• . •-• ur.a.".7,4.a.e. T:...--•---7,-;.• • j [-..-,:..- IFELISATNG24.04\ I jFEMA.. 1 frd"wr ,- ,, 1 o•rre•/5.1/1”4,6 • .....,.. . I . ' . \ i ' A I ! ... r.s...K ."'"'"."" II.,=-1::444.. / I ... I - I ' ... .. , • -- ---.. / 10,, --... • . ." • . . . . GAFIAGE FLOOR FCS TO 6' i ..--:******// r_ I 1 • ,.... ,_. • RETAIL "..--....., / . , . - ... • - . • -• • • -- .':. -P.-.,,,,.,V,In., .,.•117.4.4,10. ..e . 141111,11, / „.•••••••••••, f f f fff ty.... I \ , ....... . . . i' ..":',• •'."''''''efr....."•F:0J'Y • •5. • a•le:x .' - --'!.."...***;,,,,,,. • / " • r......, ,- • ,4,---, 0/WS SAN IC i I - '....7.......... ,r--)7: 0 ____2 , ,/, .••• .-.47.1.1"-- ror- 7".P.T=.:=Z:""'"' • vat-- _ . • - .44- -** \ I. r !I,.,t . U:',/ ' /.,. . ;. ' i ,- • 1.1 . . . • .. . *01,4 I.e. ii..."- ' \FIREFLOW • .,...,.,/1‘-- •_ ,' , :- • ...., • . r f• / . Ei /., trolukron rum cortur-Au•vro60 frth)loocor ,!.. ..,; .), BYPASS - , pi V Ie.& , • .1"...e. V, 1 -.‘V .-. - .. Lc ' • -- I . . .if • ••• 7 -. N . • — . .----17-1-._-_-.-„z. ....,_1. V". . j , i— . r•_. m i..t. ... . . ' Fi • ' '...$:70 A. \ 1 --____,.. ---.. ..., . _ , .... /...... }4' . . ..„. . . \ .11 41 I • ...._., • ,_.- --__ . ,... \\'':./,' ' \ ..,f) • -- I - ,- • • _ . . . . ,.., .. ._,.\-- .!, • ;,... . I ./ . 'NO ci•MQ Wk. - . .'...- i;. _ _ ., , ,, • ,- . if• ... • V 1•,: i •,../ . , . ,.,. • . .. . -___. .-... ... „.•-• . • . . -..---------.. ••/7 1. .. ... . . .„. . .. ._ . .• .... . . ...•.•s• N.% xis-ma's., ----• > - . • 1-- X•. -• .. . .• ....... . ,41... • 0 11.1.1 2 • . _TO EXIST 0/W b--,...* ....1,..x.',,..• C." '-' ' '-" .--'------- -1.2111_400 -----7;7'CB--7-7r.7•:::7.---. .".....:-' ::1"'':4 Q r) //:' •r, - --0110* . ---"\--•— • '1 2-•Li,e , -,---...:--, .,- ... 7 LLI al. C.) .. . . ••••.\ -J 1 ••,'.- • ''',0_'--- . --________ _ •,._ ra. 0, (. . •. -_ ,,-- . • . -.... , . • ILI .0 •---.. 0 IR .\ ; . \. .. .'• -1/ . _. • . ., .... ....,.. nxER0s,o. • ,• --- ,, -P. . ‘,... .. . ......... -J 0 C...) . •------------ r°-''• ..: I/ • _ . il• _.__ . • - fl-Acg ›-ji •-,, il - VII.1.4„ ..._, • .I I . - -. - .., __.... • :"I I o • I • ._ . -•__......_..... I _. :::_:---..., '''''''---Z--....'""•.k..."--" k ' - _._ .._ 1.•-•:-..-A__,,.-•,if — i - • - :- ., /..,;,... ---'•---:-; •••:_-_.'---.. , 's.COMPENSATING STORAGE CONCEPTS 4.„/..ea•.e i 7.;I •. N........_,_ -------. - '--....... 1------., -----.:•/I I C.---_-_-., - ., I • --151900 CF EXISTING 100 YR FLOOD PLAN VOLUME 64,800 CF FUTURE 100 YR FLOOD PLAIN VOUJME CONCEPTUAL STORM er4,- 1 . MOR C --,--• '-:-::-., 7 . 87,100 CF COMPEFISATTIG STORAGE(FCS)REQUIRED DRAI ! NAGE 7.----.-- --- ------------- -- #i*FIX EROS/QN\ % ...-. FLOOD MAN t.".0.11; I!WAY 1,10 . -------------" IHANNEL i'•:...m -.•. 22 55,300 CF NEW ER 7r UNE i'MAN4OLES PROTECTI ON : ., • -. - . . .;' 15,700 CF GARAGE FLOOR - ; ,900 CF UNDGROUND FCS - . 4.. ------ .___.. ' _ JOB$9006 • ... --- -7 93,900 CF 108%OF REOUFIEMENT No ow. " ''.‹,-.!...V a- --- .... C.11 . ..--% -...- . —-... j.-......_, 1 -‘':F.7,... ..... . . . . • - ,; e I.A AV .7. -,MAQfvt4 AV . h.G PDY 14Ay ;, I ----7— ___ JI • i /p.oyef.rlr , • of bAW�enae ti J i L-___// 1 e.p.ikk.-fa ,--... I t /ter% e: :`1 C� `r a _ l a.�°°°+D Nag/nleurrtl.: a i�'ac;TYe+v6 , . .\' — 1 .Y uao.A.o•.1b.ro a a1/ p A( .I • ` • ~�� �• /n/ Y �1'ADDVDr PCFA G .I ,.,. // ) ,, I ,// PARKING `<\ ; r J• !ie / «wa nrti GARAGE 1 - , • a rt.• / f I r NAV.I/°r°'. 'l ^/ - 1¢IrF°r. bD4 `v- r ! W{H y ' c µyt ID+vn1r. _ 9µ R nao It.w,10 (/' \.• !1•C: .J:� / i - - i •UD �� Y pK11 MI,cR /i1/ I / jV 'Df�N.� /, I OFFICE/RETAIL e / • t UY W . yrIW I:YiM - , • " _. , , _ _ - we au:.Is,• I,-vrKv°ca:cser I -1 n..,•4.h w) D •�nr5 / I I RETAIL %• / , AT tS%',AV+1 i; rI - FtpR eN I / . ,°�`fW - Im , `e• • • --- cs5�rAuyro \\ \s. Y OIG 1kn DG.>Q•�.�` I DpN •/ /� rl" .. .. lI/, ,)' ;,,. GO I° ° frT�vnl r> \\ ' WA2'W n / :. / \ ', eAnn.c 21•. \ u\.a va.eAYcv ,_ r^� `` / .. , I Oti WA1DG fiP.,yMut.DC.AS o: \` �fri -n` • , Y - yyIff yI4 ..fu.(.if �-� I E IT i •�)1, FU Ck4 k•?Moe ne - _ • • • , nOLi R.YIIW Alxf ,\` Kpf..oW np. 1 / ° `/- ~ al k I/W/6 MU., it I[dr?WSY.+.xaAce� - _ I.- '\\� • •'i- f of ls..-r trq e.Y '' i J. . - / ,T !v • LI I 2. r„.., . -JL Wispy '. a vn ne: 1 �` W wx AlNN wla. \` W q V -' vh'&t nffW.6 fa .tynt�Uv, b- _ '`1� • -.. N \� ` KOSIDD ;Aa;�°�ro x • /fA D ory s� = J - ... I .. %r\1 ..._....____ -- NIoN W,BW.Mewl.M.eeem. Joe x 9008 �\`A-_•`` sue. .m, •,. v'F .W''.- - ,,r`s Table 5. 1991 Level of Service min Project or, -, :', 1990 1992 Without Project 1992 With Project Intersection LOS Delay1 LOS Delayl LOS Delayl Rainier Avenue S at S 3rd Street E 47.1 E 50.1 E 52.6 Rainier Avenue S at S 7th Street E 42.6 E 46.2 E 462 Rawer Avenue S at S Grady Way J E F >60 F �60____ S Grady Way at Lake Avenue S C 15.5 C 15.5 C 21.1 S Grady Way at Shattuck Avenue S B 14.7 B 14.7 C 16.2 S Grady Way at Talbot Road S D 39.9 E 42.7 E 52.6 Renton Village Place at Talbot Road S E 42.4 E 472 E 57.9 Puget Drive at Talbot Road S B 12.9 B 11.2 B 11.5 S Grady Way/Benson Road at Main Ave S F >60 F >60 F >60 S 4th Street at Main Avenue S B 11.4 B 13.0 B 12.9 S 3rd Street at Main Avenue S 'C 15.9 C 16.5 C 17.5 1 Delay expressed in average seconds per vehicle. As shown in Table 5.no change in level of service (except at S Grady Way/ Shattuck Avenue S.which worsens from LOS B to LOS C) is expected. !—. • { 89463.01 The TRANSPO Group,Inc. Page 16 2 CITY F RENT::<:::>:: » » > > >» >< < » >>» O N O U Ll HEARING>�..................................................... .............. >:COU CIL HkMB ��: .. ...................5 .S CO D l~LOOR <..;.:.e appl�cation(s) Nsted are m order of application number only and not necessarily.the order in which ey w�_be heard Items wdl be celled for hearing at the discretion of the Hearing Examiner..::::: PROJECT NAME: BP OIL/NE 4TH ST PROJECT NUMBERS: CU;ECF-131-90 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: BP Oil Company seeks to remodel an existing 1,400 sf retail and service building, replace three 12,000 gallon steel underground storage tanks with three 12,000 gallon double wall fiberglass tanks,and to replace two 550 gallon steel underground storage tanks with two 550 gallon double wall fiberglass tanks. The project is located at 4105 NE 4th Street. PROJECT NAME: VILLAGE PLACE NORTH PROJECT NUMBERS: ECF;SA;CU-078-90 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Applicant seeks: 1) site plan approval for development of a new 260,363 square foot office/retail sales building, with at conditional use permit to address the fact that this complex, proposed to be ten stories/133 feet in height will exceed the height limit allowed for the structure under the Zoning Ordinance; 2) site plan approval for construction of a six level parking garage; 3) site plan approval for renovation (including partial demolition) of an existing retail center now on the subject property and for renovation of services areas. The proposed development also includes improvements to existing on-site amenities (e.g., landscaping, ingress/egress routes,and parking). A second phase of this project is to be proposed for development at a future date; this phase is tentatively planned to include 115,000 square feet of office/retail space. The City will require that Phase II undergo complete environmental and land use review at the time of application submittal. The projects have been allowed to be separated because the phases are not functionally interdependent. The project is located at Renton Village Center/South Grady Way. 0111"416 DEPARTI -IT OF PLANNING/BUILDING/Pf---.IC WORKS PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING APPLICANT: Renton Village Associates; Callison Partnership FILE NUMBER: ECF; SA; CU 078-90 LOCATION: Renton Village Center/South Grady Way A. SUMMARY AND PURPOSE OF REQUEST: The applicant is seeking: 1) site plan approval for development of a new 260,363 square foot office/retail sales building (with a conditional use permit to address the fact that this complex, proposed to be ten stories/133 feet in height,will exceed the height limit allowed for the structure under the Zoning Ordinance); 2) site plan approval for construction of a six level parking garage; and 3) site plan approval for renovation of an existing retail center and services areas. B. GENERAL INFORMATION: 1. Owner of Record: Renton Village Associates 2. Applicant: Renton Village Associates/Callison Partnership 3. Existing Zoning: Commercial Use (B-1) 4. Existing Zoning in the Area: Commercial (B-1), Light Industrial (L-1); Public Use (P-1); Residential Use 5. Comprehensive Land Use Plan: Commercial Use 6. Size of Property: 14 + acres/609,960 sq.ft. 7. Access: South Grady Way; Lake Avenue 8. Land Use: Vacant land; commercial use 9. Neighborhood Characteristics: North: Light Industrial uses. East: Commercial uses. South: Commercial uses. West: Commercial uses. C. HISTORICAL/BACKGROUND: Action File Ordinance Date Initial annexation --- 1547 5-24-56 (Staff research Indicates that commercial zoning was assigned at the time of annexation, however, City records do not specifically discuss zoning action on this site.) D. PUBLIC SERVICES: 1. Utilities a. Water: Eight inch and six inch water lines serve this site. b. Sewer: Eight inch sanitary sewer lines serve this site. c. Storm Water Drainage: This site is in the Talbot Hill collection basin. There is a 36 inch storm line at the southwest corner of the site. 2. Fire Protection: Provided by the City of Renton as per ordinance requirements. 3. Transit: A Metro transit park and ride lot is located north of the subject site on the north side of Grady Way South. Several Metro routes include service to this lot. 4. Schools: N/A 5. Recreation: Burnett Linear Park is approximately one mile east of the site. Liberty View Park and Philip Arnold Park are within approximately two miles of the site. prelmrpt 011kliketIMINARY REPORT TO THE FLL�;.'IING EXAMINER Village Place North PUBLIC HEARING February 12, 1991 Page 2 E. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE ZONING CODE: 1. Section 4-31-10, B-1 Business District. 2. Section 4-31-36, Conditional Use Permit. 3. Section 4-31-19(F),Variance. - 4. Section 4-31-33, Site Plan Ordinance Review. 5. Section 4-31-34, Landscaping Ordinance. 6. Section 4-14, Parking and Loading Ordinance. F. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR OTHER OFFICIAL CITY DOCUMENT: 1. Central Renton Plan, City of Renton Comprehensive Plan Compendium, 1986 (pgs. 61-67). 2. Commercial Goal, Objectives and Policies, City of Renton Comprehensive Plan Compendium, 1986 (pgs. 16-18). 3. Urban Design Goal, Objectives and Policies, City of Renton Comprehensive Plan Compendium, 1986 (pgs. 11-14). G. DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS: 1. The applicant Is seeking: 1) site plan approval for development of a new 260,363 square foot office/retail sales building (with a conditional use permit to address the fact that this complex, proposed to be ten stories/133 feet in height, will exceed the height limit allowed for the structure under the Zoning Ordinance); 2) site plan approval for construction of a six level parking garage (1401 spaces) to supplement the existing 261 spaces to be retained elsewhere on the campus; and 3) site plan approval for renovation (including partial demolition) of an existing retail center and service areas. The proposed development also includes improvements to existing on-site amenities (e.g.,landscaping, ingress/egress routes, and parking). A second phase may include 100,000 gsf of office over 15,000 gsf of retail space. Approximately 35,000 gsf of retail space, now occupied by Ernst, would be demolished to make way for this building, resulting in a net reduction of 20,000 gsf of retail space. The second phase Is anticipated to require up to 587 additional parking spaces. The City will require that Phase II undergo complete environmental and land use review at the time of application submittal. The projects have been allowed to be separated because the phases are not functionally interdependent. 2. Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and SEPA (RCW 43.21 [C], 1971, as amended), the Environmental Review Committee reviewed the project and identified likely impacts in the areas of land use, aesthetics,traffic, public services/utilities, noise, light, glare and recreation. A Determination of Non-Significance - Mitigated, was issued by the Environmental Review Committee on November 27, 1990 (amended on January 4, 1991). The following conditions were established to address the above-referenced impacts. a. The applicant shall, in order to address aesthetic impacts, revise the landscape plan to include more significant landscaping around the southwestern facade of the five story parking garage in order to soften its apparent bulk,with a conceptual plan to be approved to the satisfaction of the Planning/Building/Public Works Department and the Fire Department prior to public hearing for site plan/conditional use review and a specific plan to be approved to the satisfaction of the Planning/Building/Public Works Department and the Fire Department prior to issuance of site preparation/building permits and with landscaping to be installed prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. b. The applicant shall, in order to address light/glare impacts, prepare a solar glare diagram for those hours of the day on the equinox, summer,and winter solstices when the angle of reflected sunlight is at an angle of 30 degrees or less with the horizon, In order that staff can ascertain whether reflected glare is likely to Impact 1-405 or Grady Way traffic. This diagram shall be submitted to the Development Planning Section at least two weeks prior to public hearing, so that staff can ascertain whether mitigation measures should be recommended to the Hearing Examiner for light/glare management. c. The applicant, in order to address transportation system Impacts, shall: 1) directly provide improvements proposed for the Grady Way Benefit Zone, to the satisfaction of the Transportation Systems Division, prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy for this development; OR 2) make a contribution of $436,758.32 to the (pending) Grady Way Transportation Benefit Zone, prior to the issuance of site preparation/building permits. d. The applicant, in order to address transportation system Impacts, shall provide: 1) Improvements to the south leg of the intersection of South Grady Way and Lake Avenue South, including: (a) designated travel lanes as presented on the site plans submitted by the applicant (dated October, 1990); and (b) improvements to signalization (e.g., equipment relocation) at the Grady Way/Lake Avenue intersection to ensure safe, efficient functioning of those designated travel lanes. These plans shall be approved to the prelmrpt PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER Village Place North PUBLIC HEARING Febr i ary 12, 1991 Page,3 satisfaction of the Transportation Systems Division prior to the Issuance of the first site preparation/building permits and all Improvements are to be installed prior to the Issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy for the subject development. e. The applicant, in order to address transportation system impacts, shall provide improvements to street lighting (replacement of mercury vapor lighting units with sodium vapor units) along the south side of Grady Way South extending from Lake Avenue to the eastern boundary of the site,to the satisfaction of the Public Works Department, prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy for the subject development. f. The applicant, in order to address transportation system impacts, shall be encouraged to make a;voluntary contribution in the amount of $4,000.00 ($1.40 per trip/2873 trips) to the City as a fair share payment toward a City-sponsored study to: 1) determine the feasibility of improving the Grady Way eastbound right turn lane (to open this lane up to through traffic from Rainier Avenue to Talbot Road); and 2) determine the feasibility of improving the intersection of Talbot Road South/South Grady Way, through channelization improvements (e.g., curbs, signalization, elimination of right turn trap at the south leg of the intersection). This contribution should be provided to the satisfaction of the Transportation Systems Division, prior to the Issuance of the first site preparation/building permits for the subject development. In the event that this study determines that the improvements are feasible, and the City elects to install roadway modifications, the applicant may be called upon to provide a fair share contribution to these improvements, with the cost of the study credited as a portion of the fair share contribution. • g. The applicant shall, In order to address transportation system Impacts, provide a Transportation Management Plan, including (but not limited to): 1) provision of van pool/car pool systems, preferential parking for HOVs, fee-for-parking plan for employees, subsidized bus passes, public transit;and ride- sharing information materials, a bus shelter, "kiss-and-ride" facilities, bicycle lanes, bicycle parking plans, and a fair share contribution to a study exploring the feasibility of implementing a shuttle service to the site from the local residential community; 2) a system/fees for monitoring of the TMP to determine its level of functioning and to make necessary modifications (such as relocation of preferential parking);'and 3) an Implementation schedule to serve the new office/retail complex. Facilities plans shall be developed to the satisfaction of the Planning/Building/Public Works Department and METRO, prior to issuance of site preparation/ building permits. Service plans shall be developed to the satisfaction of the Planning/Building/Public Works Department and METRO, prior to issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy. Facilities and services shall be implemented at the time of occupancy of the first structure. (Note g.1: If, after having had in place an effective TMP for two years, the applicant can demonstrate the need for additional parking, he can request release of the reserved parking. It shall be the responsibility of the Planning/Building/Public Works Administrator to release sections or all of the parking places held in reserve.) h. The applicant shall, In order to address transportation system impacts and public safety, provide a parking plan which Includes, but is not limited to: 1) placement of twenty percent of the 1432 parking spaces required for the office facility In reserve (with the reserve parking spaces to be shelled off on the top level of • the parking garage); 2) reserved parking areas on the roof of the garage, with landscaping, seating and a jogging trail in those reserved areas); 3) establishment of a system for assigning parking for retail consumers,vendors and visitors to the office complex to outside areas and the lower level of the garage, with signage indicating those spaces which are so reserved and restricting parking to specified periods; 4) construction of load/unload areas next to the skybridge at the second level lithe garage; 5) establishment of a system for assigning upper levels of the garage to employees, with signage indicating those areas which are so reserved, and with a security system (controlled access, lighting, emergency service phones, etc.); and 6) provision of a total of 29 handicapped parking stalls to serve employees, consumers and visitors--with those spaces serving the office building to be adjacent to the skybridge and those spaces serving the retail area to be immediately adjacent to the retail center. These plans shall be established in concept, to the satisfaction of Planning/Building/Public Works, the Police Department and the Fire Department, prior to the public hearing for site plan/conditional use review. Specific plans shall be approved to the satisfaction of Planning/Building/Public Works, the Police Department and the Fire Department, prior to the issuance of site preparation/building permits, and shall be installed prior to Issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy.(') el Actual parking plans will illustrate a modest adjustment to permitted/provided parking spaces, reflecting Ordinance standards for this mixed use development(See G.4.f). (NOTE h.1: The applicant Is encouraged to Install a hydraulic elevator in the parking garage for the convenience/safety of employees,visitors and vendors.) • 1. The applicant shall, in order to address impacts to earth and storm water management impacts,develop a storm drainage plan and flood protection plan (including elevation of all structures a minimum,of two feet above the flood plain and providing compensatory water storage areas on site), based upon the Surface and Storm Water Management Ordinance. The conceptual storm water management plan must be submitted at least two weeks prior to the public hearing for the project and approved by the Storm Water Engineering Section In advance of that hearing. A specific storm water management plan shall be approved by the Storm Water Engineering Section prior to issuance of site preparation/building permits. (Note 1.1: The applicant may elect to address storm drainage management exclusively through on-site retention/detention or may develop a plan for routing water to the Panther Creek Wetlands. If the wetlands are to receive water from this site,the plan for conveyance and/or deposit must be approved by the State Departments of Fisheries and Ecology, the Army Corps and related agencies. The Storm Water Engineering Section will take responsibility for coordination of plan review with federal, state and local agencies,as necessary.) pork4ELJMINARY REPORT TO THE I I . LING EXAMINER Village Place North • PUBLIC HEARING February 12, 1991 Page 4 j. The applicant shall, In order to address impacts to earth and storm water management, provide a "hold harmless" agreement which acknowledges that the City has informed the applicant that the subject property is located in an area which may be included in an existing/altered 100 year flood plain, and that the applicants have decided to proceed, at their own volition, thereby waiving their rights to hold the municipality liable for any flooding and/or for any damages to property or person arising from such flooding. This document is to be approved by the Storm Water Engineering Section and the City Attorney, and to be duly recorded prior to the issuance of site preparation/building permits.. k. The applicant shall, In order to address on-site recreation impacts, provide a plan for interior recreation areas with shower facilities in the office/retail building, for use by employees). This plan shall be approved, in concept, by Planning/Building/Public Works prior to public hearing for project review. Specific plans shall be approved by the Planning/Building/Public Works Department, prior to issuance of site preparation/building permits;facilities shall be installed prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for the building. I. The applicant shall, in order to address community recreation impacts, provide: 1) a plan for development and implementation of off-site recreation improvements to the satisfaction of the Parks and Recreation Department; OR 2) make a voluntary contribution of $20,000.00 to the development of community recreational facilities (Comprehensive Parks Plan, Master Trails Plan), in order to mitigate recreation impacts. In the event that the applicant opts to provide off-site improvements directly, these shall be installed prior to issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy. In the event,that the applicant prefers to make a contribution,fees shall be provided prior to issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy. m. The applicant shall develop a Construction Management Mitigation Plan that addresses: 1) hours of operation, 2) hauling routes, 3) staging areas, 4) employee and contractor parking, 5) erosion control, 6) the disposal of hazardous materials associated with soils remediation/construction, and 7) signage identifying construction areas in order to facilitate timely provision of emergency services. A conceptual plan shall be submitted at least two weeks in advance of public hearing for the complex, and shall be approved by the Planning/Building/Public Works Department and Fire Prevention Bureau prior to that hearing. Specific plans shall be approved by the Planning/Building/Public Works Department and the Fire Prevention Bureau prior to issuance of site preparation/building permits. (NOTE: In conjunction with land use review, staff may recommend modifications to site plans and landscaping plans to achieve full compliance with Code requirements and additional conditions to ensure adequate functioning of the development(e.g., covenant for joint use of parking areas and amenities, landscaping maintenance bonds.) (NOTE: The applicant will be required to make all Code mandated off-site and on-site improvements, including sidewalks, curbs, gutters, street lighting, utility lines, and utility system fees prior to issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy.) 3. SITE PLAN APPROVAL CRITERIA: Section 4-31-33(D)(1) lists ten criteria that the Hearing Examiner is asked to consider, along with all other relevant information, in making a decision on a Site Plan Approval application. These include the following: a. Conformance with the Comprehensive Plan, its elements and policies; The proposed renovation and development of an office/retail complex complies with the Comprehensive Plan Map designation of "Commercial Use" for the subject site, and is in compliance with relevant Goals, Policies and Objectives for commercial and office developments (e.g., Policy V.A.3. which encourages clustered development, V.A.4. which calls for commercial developments to be located to minimize travel/traffic congestion;V.A.7.which calls for commercial areas to be compatible with adjacent land uses; and V.A.9 which calls for a variety of goods and services to be available within a commercial area). b. Conformance with existing land use regulations; The proposed development complies with the Land Use Map designation for Commercial Use (B-1). The complex, as designed, generally complies with applicable development standards for the Commercial Zone, as well as those regulations established in the Landscaping,Ordinance and the Parking and Loading Ordinance (with minor modifications). Because the proposed office tower is planned to be 133 feet in height, exceeding the existing height limit of 95 feet in the B-1 zone by approximately 38 feet, the project must be considered as a conditional use; as submitted this structure generally complies with standards established under the Conditional Use Ordinance. Further, the proposed renovation of the existing commercial center and construction of a parking garage generally are consistent with criteria established for site plan approval. The proposed private roadway generally is consistent with criteria established under the Variance Ordinance. c. Mitigation of impact to surrounding properties and uses; The subject property is currently developed with commercial and office uses, as is property to the south, east and west of the site. Property to the north of the site is currently zoned L-1 and developed with a Metro Park and Ride Lot. The site is convenient to major City arterials, a state roadway, and 1-405. In addition,the site is close to SeaTac and the Renton Municipal Airport. The subject proposal for some 260,363 square feet of new, net rentable office space and approximately 13,650 square feet of new retail space on the first floor, as well as some 79,000 square feet of remodeled space will, when combined with the office and retail space already on the Renton Village Shopping Center site, help anchor this southern edge of the downtown as a strong commercial (office and retail) node. Although on the edge of the downtown proper,this node should help stabilize the commercially designated (Comprehensive Plan) and/or zoned properties to the north. prelmrpt PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER Village Place North PUBLIC HEARING February 12, 1991 Page 5 , , The proposed office tower itself would house approximately 800 to 1,000 new employees who would be likely to, at least occasionally, take advantage of other retail uses and services In the area. ,It is also possible that some retail activity could be drawn away from the existing core into this area because of its more readily available off-street parking, more contemporary image, and critical mass. The construction of parking facilities (and an access roadway) will Increase accessibility of the center, and make it more convenient for consumers to use. From an aesthetic standpoint, the new 10 story, mixed-use, office/retail building and six story parking garage (designed to accommodate 1401 parking spaces) should be an attractive addition to the downtown, using a combination of painted concrete spandrels and bluish green tinted glazing, and porcelain tiles as an accent material for exterior surfaces at ground level and at the top of the building. To add visual Interest, the northwest corner of the building has been articulated in planes so that it breaks away from the standard rectilinear form of most contemporary office buildings. This feature, along with sculpted details on the facade of the top two floors, as well as an articulated first floor featuring a recessed arcade on the east face of the building, and a plaza on the south, should make this new building one of the more attractive buildings in the City. The proposed new six-story parking garage (including one subterranean level) is planned to be over 480 feet long along its eastern facade. This structure, because it is a very dissimilar use from other on site facilities (e.g., different floor to ceiling heights, sloping floors, and different engineering requirements) poses an architectural challenge with respect to achieving aesthetic integration with the remainder of the development. The applicant has endeavored to design the structure in ways which break down the apparent bulk and achieve thematic Integration with the more suburban scale found elsewhere in the center. For example, the perception of the mass of the garage has been decreased by indenting the corners of the structure which are closest to Grady Way, introducing some slight (depth wise) 30 plus feet wide recessed areas and recessed stairwells, as well as employing different materials and textures along different portions of the garage's facades. Along the street sides --north,west and south -- of the,garage, larger(14 - 20 foot high, 4- 6 Inch caliper) trees are proposed to soften the "view from the street". Some landscaping (11 flowering cherry trees, of 2 inch caliper) is also proposed for the roof of the garage. (Also see Section G.4.d. of this report.) In addition to these major new structures,approximately 11,000 square feet of new retail space Is proposed in two new retail centers that will abut either side of a new pedestrian pathway that connects the new office building to the other major office buildings on the campus. The two new smaller retail areas will be centrally located (at the north end of Pay-N-Save and the south end of Thriftway), replacing existing small businesses (e.g., a pet store) and office space. In addition to this redevelopment, the front of existing stores (including Schumskys Restaurant) will be improved with a new colonnaded facade/arcade that will thematically match the design features to be Installed at the ground level of the new office building. Staff believe that the office and retail portions of the project Interface effectively, based upon thematic integrity of design features. As noted above, the office building is likely to be an attractive addition to the City's skyline, as well. Only the existing Ernst store and the parking garage would appear to have the distinction of not thematically "fitting in" -- it would seem reasonable that a colonnaded arcade,similar to that in front of Pay-N-Save, could be used to better integrate the Ernst store into the whole complex. The proposed action is consistent with surrounding land uses and would enhance the image and character of the surrounding area. , d. Mitigation of impacts of the proposed site plan to the site; ill The subject proposal --to provide a ten story building with 260,363 square feet of new, net rentable office ' space and approximately 13,650 square feet of new retail space (on the first floor), as well as some 79,000 square feet of remodeled space and a six-story parking garage --will, when combined with the office and retail space already on the Renton Village Shopping Center site, establish this site as a major office/retail center. The design elements previously discussed -- painted concrete spandrels, tinted glazing, porcelain tiles, articulated and sculpted planes, recessed arcade and open plaza (also.see G.4.c) -- should result in a visually attractive complex which is integrated with existing development on this site and other Improvements on the campus (facade colors, textures, pavers, etc.) and which is planned to be coordinated with future phases of the Village Place Center. The previously described features of the new six-level parking garage -- construction of one subterranean level, Indented corners,wide recessed areas and employment of the different materials and textures along different portions of the garage's facades -- should serve to decrease the perception of the mass of the garage on the site as well as to neighboring properties. The southern and southwestern facades of the garage which face both a public roadway and other areas of the campus as a whole, will be improved with landscaping. For example, street trees, 30 feet on center, are proposed to screen the south end of the garage. The eastern side of the structure, which faces the interior of the campus, is to be planted with shrubs. Staff will recommend design revisions to the garage to provide more visible, open stairwells to protect persons using those routes to the parking garage. In addition, the design of the two new smaller retail areas described previously in this report, is intended to mitigate impacts to the site through such features as a thematically coordinated new colonnaded arcade that will match the design features to be installed at the ground level of the new office building and new pedestrian pathways to link commercial, office and service areas on the site. Also, two decorative towers are proposed along the pedestrian pathway linking the ten-story office building to this remodeled retail area. Recommendations outlined above for provision of a colonnaded area for the existing'Ernst store should serve to better integrate this store into the whole complex. prelmrpt 1, • • PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE IitAHING EXAMINER Village Place North PUBLIC HEARING February 12, 1991 Page 6 • e. Conservation of area-wide property values;• The proposed commercial/office complex is not expected to have a negative Impact on property values in the area since the project will result in: 1) development of now vacant or underdeveloped parcels, leading to an inherent Increase in property values; and 2) the development of a project (structures, landscaping, amenities) which is designed to be compatible with retained uses on the site and with land uses on neighboring sites. • f. Safety and efficiency of vehicle and pedestrian circulation; • • The proposed development(Phase I) is anticipated to generate 2873 ADWVTE to and from the commercial . and office complexes. The Transportation Systems Division has Indicated that there could be significant = Impacts on the transportation system from this project(Phase I), and has,tentatively identified additional Impacts from tentatively planned Phase II. To address some of the anticipated immediate project-related impacts,the applicant did complete a traffic analysis for their proposal. This study recommended that the intersection of S. Grady Way and Lake Avenue S. be enhanced with improvements to the south leg of the intersection by widening it to allow two • exclusive northbound left-turn lanes and a through right lane and the applicant has included these improvements in the project proposal. The Transportation Systems Division supported these proposed improvements, and,also, advised that the applicant provide a fair share contribution to studies for additional improvements in the area of the site (e.g., modifications to existing turning lanes, development of new turning lanes). Further, the applicant will be providing a comprehensive Transportation Management Plan and making a contribution to the Grady Way TBZ prior to site plan approval). • Presently,the applicant is planning to provide 1768 parking spaces (of which 1401 are to be located within the parking garage) -- 1302 of the spaces on the campus (in the garage) will be assigned for office employees and visitors. Additionally, 466 spaces will be provided for retail use (employees and consumers), including 99 new spaces in the garage and 261 retained open parking spaces. This plan is • generally consistent with the Parking and Loading Ordinance requirements for this mixed use complex(5.5 spaces per 1000 square feet of net usable area). Staff note that the applicant has provided 5.0 spaces per 1000 feet of net usable area•for the retail center -- however, because this space allocation is based upon calculations assuming that 90% of space is usable, rather than the.85% of typically considered usable, the total number of spaces Is essentially equivalent to those required by Code. Staff have called for twenty percent of,the required spaces to be placed in reserve, including: 1) reservation of spaces for retail consumers/visitors both in the garage and open area and; 2) reservation of 260 spaces for office employees within the garage. Reserve spaces will need to be landscaped; a portion of the reserved area on the top level of the garage will be utilized for recreation facilities for employees. Handicapped parking is • to be provided to comply with Code requirements. All parking areas are planned to be signed to provide information about use/time restrictions. ' For example, signage will be provided to restrict retail/visitor parking to outside areas and lower garage levels; office employee parking will be provided on upper garage levels. Retail/visitor parking is to be confined to two.hours. Employee areas are planned to be secured and provided with lighting and emergency aid • devices(e.g., phones),with plans having been approved by the Police Department. Impacts and mitigation measures for Phase II of this office/retail complex will be considered at the time of • application for that complex. Note: See G.2.for mitigation measures which address construction-related traffic Impacts. g. Provision of adequate light and air; . The proposed development includes two sizeable structures--a ten-story office/commercial building and • five-story garage. -- which are anticipated to have some impact upon light/air circulation on the site. Shadow analyses and light/glare analyses (reflective glare diagram for those hours and times of the year when reflective glare is likely to be visible from,the building when the angle of the reflected sunlight is 30 degrees or less with the horizon) have been provided which address effects.to.the site, to neighboring private properties and 1-405. Findings from these studies indicate that these structures have been proposed and/or recommended to • include design features which should reduce glare impacts to motorists. Reflective glare from the proposed 10-story.office building is to be minimized by introduction of window treatment (e.g., recessed windows, angulation of panes) on those facades which are major sources of glare so that vision of motorists could be Impacted. Plantings around the buildings and in parking areas should also serve to minimize on-site light/glare impacts from structures at lower levels and from parked cars. On site exterior pole lighting will be screened to be so that it is contained on site. Structures have also been sufficiently separated to permit adequate light and air circulation between buildings. h. Mitigation of noise,odors,and other harmful or unhealthy conditions; (1) Construction Standard construction-related Impacts are anticipated in conjunction with proposed activities. Conditions have been established in conjunction with environmental review (Section G.2) to mitigate those impacts. Particular care will be needed to address.noise, traffic, dust and debris Impacts to persons using "functioning" portions of the subject development, and to nearby land uses. Since there is an adjacent hotel, construction hours and hauling hours will need to be limited prelmrpt PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER Village Place North PUBLIC HEARING February 12, 1991 Page 7 to protect the privacy of hotel guests, pursuant to conditions established by the Environmental Review Committee. Staff will recommend to the Building Division that construction be limited to hours between 7:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m. and that hauling be permitted only between the hours of 8:30 a.m.to 3:30 p.m.and 6:30 p.m.to 10:00 p.m. The applicant will need to obtain a demolition permit for removal of existing structures. (2) Operations Operation of the proposed office/commercial structure and parking garage are not expected to generate either types or levels of impacts (e.g., sound, odor) which are substantially greater than or different from those generated in conjunction with existing commercial, office and public uses on the site and/or in the vicinity. Location of office/commercial improvements away from site boundaries and installation of standard Improvements (e.g.,venting, insulation) should limit sound and odor impacts from nearby private developments and from travel corridors. i. Availability of public services and facilities to accommodate the proposed use;and ' (1) Emergency Services The subject proposal is not anticipated to have significant adverse impacts on fire service resources, if built pursuant to Code (including "high rise" requirements), Plans provided by the applicant have addressed Fire Prevention Bureau concerns (e.g., building identification, emergency access,alarm systems, suppression equipment). The applicant has also modified plans to generally address Police Department requirements for installation of Improvements in the office/commercial building and parking structure (e.g., signage, lighting, emergency phones) to ensure security to persons and property. Revisions will be recommended to the stairwells In the parking garage so that these areas are visible from adjoining structures and open areas, in order to protect safety of persons and property. { (2) Storm Water Management 1 The proposed development can be incorporated into the existing storm water management system, effectively, either utilizing on-site/adjacent systems or storm water run-off can be addressed through a management system utilizing the Panther Creek Wetlands. Options for selection and operation of systems are being reviewed presently by the applicant and the Storm Water Engineering Division. (See Memorandum from Randall Parsons, dated 1/21/91 in project file). Special measures, perhaps including, but not limited to elevation of buildings, compensatory flood storage, and/or a "hold harmless" agreement may be required to achieve the necessary levels of service to the development, as well as necessary levels of protection to the subject property (and neighboring sites) as a result of the fact that portions of the site area subject to flooding during the rainy season. (See Section G.2. -ERC Mitigation Measures). (3) Recreation The subject property is proximate to passive recreation activities (e.g.., picnic tables, movie theaters) on (or adjacent to)this site. Additionally, Burnett Linear Park is nearby (north and east of the site). In order to ensure an adequate range and quantity of recreational opportunities to employees and users of Village Place, the applicant has proposed a one-quarter mile long walking/jogging path around the parking structure which is to include a couple of stretching and exercising stations. An indoor exercise room and shower facilities for employees has been provided,as well as facilities--such as a volleyball court and seating areas--on the roof(level six) of the parking garage. A voluntary contribution -- or off-site improvements--will also be provided to support improvements to regional recreation facilities. j. Prevention of neighborhood deterioration and blight. The proposed facility is expected to have a generally positive impact on surroundings properties and on the local area as a whole by providing for attractive, functional use of the site and by effective mitigation of off-site impacts. ti 4. CONDITIONAL USE CRITERIA: Section 4-31-36 lists 11 criteria that the Hearing Examiner is asked,to consider, along with all other relevant information, In making a decision on a Conditional Use application. A Conditional Use permit is required for the construction of the office building to'133 feet in height (rather than the 95 foot height limit customarily established for development in the B-1 zone). The criteria include the following: a. Comprehensive Plan: The proposed use shall be compatible with the general purpose, goals, objectives and standards of the Comprehensive Plan, the Zoning Ordinance and any other plan, program, map or ordinance of the City of Renton. The proposed ten-story complex generally'complies with the Comprehensive Plan Map designation of "Commercial Use"for the subject site, and is in compliance with relevant Goals, Policies and Objectives for commercial and office developments (see Section G.4.a.). b. Community Need: There shall be a community need for the proposed use at the proposed location. In the determination of community need, the Hearing Examiner shall consider the following factors, among all other relevant information: prelmrpt i LlMINARY REPORT TO THE FL___IING EXAMINER Village Place North PUBLIC HEARING February 12, 1991 Page 8 (1) The proposed location shall not result in either •the detrimental overconcentration of a particular use within the City or within the immediate area of the proposed use. The proposed ten-story office/commercial structure, when combined with the office and retail space already on the Renton Village Shopping Center site, and the intended future Phase II, result in a sizeable development. However, this concentration, rather than being detrimental, is anticipated to help to anchor this southern edge of the downtown as a viable commercial and retail center, while helping to stabilize the commercially designated areas to the north (see Comprehensive Plan Map). (2) That the proposed location is suited for the proposed use. The proposed location of the ten-story complex is well-suited for the planned development, based upon its proximity to other commercial and office developments, to services (e.g., banks, transit), and to roadways. Public services/utilities resources are adequate to support the intended high- rise office/commercial structure(see G.4.1). The site is adequate to provide support services for the ten-story structure together with other developments on the site --e.g., the construction of parking facilities (and an access roadway) will Increase the center's accessibility,and make it more convenient for consumers to use. c. Effect on Adjacent Properties: The proposed use at the proposed location shall not result in substantial or undue adverse effects on adjacent property. The following site requirements shall be required: (1) Lot Coverage: Lot coverage in residential districts (R-1 and R-2) shall not.exceed fifty percent (50%) and the lot coverage of the zone in which the proposed use is to be located. • Lot coverage in all other zones shall conform to the requirements of zone in which the proposed use is to be located. Lot utilization--with the proposed complex as a whole, including the planned ten-story structure-- is within the 75%coverage permitted under the Zoning Ordinance-4-31-10. (2) Yards: Yards shall conform to the requirements of the zone in which the proposed use is to be located. Additions to the structure shall not be allowed in any required yard. Set backs for the development as a whole, including the proposed ten-story.structure, meet or exceed development standards for commercial structures exceeding 80 feet in height. (3) Height: Building and structure heights shall conform to the requirements of the zone in which the proposed use is to be located. Spires, belltowers, public utility antennas or similar structure may exceed the height requirement upon approval of a variance. Building heights should be related to surrounding used in order to allow optimal sunlight and ventilation, and minimal obstruction of views from adjacent structures. The proposed structure, at 133 feet, exceeds the 95 foot height limit established for principally permitted uses In the Commercial Zone. The planned building would be allowed under a conditional use permit,and, is the subject of this application. As designed, the structure would be generally compatible with the nearby Evergreen Office Building and the Holiday Inn. The proposed location provides sufficient separation from other structures on the site to allow air and light circulation on the site, to offer attractive view corridors and to ensure adequate privacy/defensible space. d. Compatibility: The proposed use shall be compatible with the residential scale and character of the neighborhood. (Ord.3599, 1-11-82) The subject proposal.(for office space) will,when combined with the office and retail space already on the Renton Village Shopping Center site, help anchor this southern edge of the downtown as a strong commercial and retail node (both through design and utilization). Although on the edge of the downtown proper, this development node should help stabilize the commercially designated (Comprehensive Plan) and/or zoned properties to the north, by preserving shopping patterns in this area and by introducing additional,employees. Increasing the height of the proposed structure--as opposed to constructing an additional structure on the site -- ensures the availability of a greater amount of open space and enables the installation of more amenities(e.g., landscaping, recreation facilities). • The proposed office tower (top 3 levels of the ten-story building) itself would house approximately 200 employees of the 800 - 1000 employees in the complex as a whole. These persons could be reasonably expected to utilize other retail uses and services in the area. • prelmrpt PRE IMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER Village Place North PUBLIC HEARING Febr ary 12, 1991 Pag 9 e. Parking: Parking under the building structure should be encouraged. Lot coverage' may be increased to as much as seventy-five percent (75%) of the lot coverage requirement of the zone, in which the proposed use is located, if all parking is provided underground or within the structure. (Ord.3903,4-22-85) Presently, the applicant is proposing the addition of 1302 new parking spaces for office use.1 Planned parking facilities are anticipated to be adequate to serve employees of and visitors to the proposed structure; in the event that additional parking is necessary, existing reserve parking can be released by the City. Because this site is located in an area in which the water table is high, substantial subterranean parking cannot be permitted. f. Traffic: Traffic and circulation patterns of vehicles and pedestrians relating to the proposed use and surrounding area shall be reviewed for potential effects on, and to ensure safe movement in the surrounding area. The Transportation Systems Division does not anticipate significantly increased traffic impacts from the number of employees/visitors to the proposed 133 foot high building as compared to a 95 foot high structure. Neither would any change in levels of service occur. Transportation analyses/mitigation measures (e.g., fees, studies, improvements, and TMP) were undertaken based upon impacts anticipated from the development of the proposed ten-story structure. Impacts and mitigation measures for Phase II of this office/retail complex will be considered at the time of application for that complex. 9• Noise,Glare: Potential noise, light and glare impacts shall be evaluated based on the location of the proposed use on the lot and the location of on-site parking areas, outdoor recreational areas and refuse storage areas. Based upon staff review of site features, design/location of improvements, access plans and related characteristics, staff believe that no significant increase in noise will occur from development/utilization of a 133 foot high structure,as compared to a 95 foot structure. Light and glare from the proposed 133 foot building could potentially impact neighboring uses and travellers on nearby 1-405 more than would a 95 foot high building. A light and glare study(reflective glare diagram for those hours and times of the year when reflective glare is likely to be visible from the building when the angle of the reflected sunlight is 30 degrees or less with the horizon) has been provided which addresses those effects. Mitigation measures have been proposed/recommended to address this impact (e.g., recessed windows, angulation of windows and/or facades); these measures are considered to be sufficient to address likely (as a worst case situation) impacts on Grady Way (also see Section G.4.g above.) h. Landscaping: Landscaping shall be provided in all areas not occupied by building or paving. The . Hearing Examiner may require additional landscaping to buffer adjacent properties from potentially adverse effects of the proposed use. The plan for a single 133 foot building in this complex, rather than alternative designs (e.g.,two buildings of 95 feet or less) makes available additional open space on the site. The proponent has provided a landscaping plan which Includes improvements designed to meet/exceed standards established by the Landscaping Ordinance (4-14) for the development. These improvements (while they do not directly relate to the proposed conditional use) do generally address aesthetic impacts from the development and enhance the quality of open space within the complex(see G.4.c/d). I. Accessory Uses: Accessory uses to conditional uses such as day schools, auditoriums used for social and sport activities, health centers, convents, preschool facilities, convalescent homes and others of a similar nature shall be considered to be separate uses and shall be subject to the provisions of the use district in which they are located. Not applicable. j. Conversion: No existing building or structure shall be converted to a conditional use unless such building or structure complies,or is brought into compliance,with the provisions of this Chapter. Not applicable. k. Public Improvements: The proposed use and location shall be adequately served by and not impose an undue burden on any public improvements, facilities, utilities, and services. Approval of a conditional use permit may be conditional upon the provision and/or guarantee by the applicant of necessary public improvements,facilities, utilities,and/or services. (1) Emergency Services The subject proposal Is not anticipated to have significant adverse impacts on ;,fire service resources or police resources if built pursuant to Code (including "high rise" requirements). The proposed building also will be fully sprinklered. pre rirpt , 11 :ELiMINARY REPORT TO THE I ZING EXAMINER 0 Village Place North PUBLIC HEARING February 12, 1991 Page 10 (2) Storm Water Management The subject development could, be served through incorporation into the planned drainage management system. It is not anticipated to cause significant additional adverse impacts on storm water drainage management, as it would not change the quantity/quality of run-off or Increase impervious surfaces on the site, as the majority of the site is developed with structures or paved areas. Similarly, improvements such as oil/water separators, should adequately collect contaminants from parking areas which serve employees in this section of the office tower. (3) Recreation On-site recreational amenities have been designed and commitment to Improvement of community recreational facilities has been established based upon the proposed 10 story office structure. These facilities are viewed as benefitting the appearance and effective functioning of the site and as providing a desirable community amenity as well. Existing community facilities can accommodate the anticipated number of additional users. H. DEPARTMENTAL RECOMMENDATION: 1. Staff recommend that the Hearing Examiner approve the proposed site plan for the Village Place North Office/Commercial complex(File No.078-90)with the following conditions: a. The applicant shall comply with all conditions established by the Environmental Review Committee on January 4, 1991. b. The applicant shall redesign the stairwells for the parking garage, to provide open facades so that persons travelling in those facilities are visible from adjacent buildings and outside areas, in order to protect the safety of persons and property. Plans shall be approved by the Planning/Building/Public Works Department prior to issuance of site preparation/building permits and shall be installed in conjunction with development of the garage. c. The applicant shall modify the north facade of the office tower so that reflected solar glare impacts of more than three seconds duration within a drivers' normal cone of vision are prevented. Plans shall be approved by the Planning/Building/Public Works Department prior to Issuance of site preparation/building permits and shall be installed in conjunction with development of the garage. d. The applicant shall provide improvements to the Ernst Center facade to achieve coordination with the proposed new complex and the renovated portions of the existing complex. Plans shall be approved by the Planning/Building/Public Works Department prior to issuance of occupancy permits for Village Place North and shall be Installed within one year of final occupancy. e. The applicant shall provide a landscaping maintenance surety device equivalent to ten percent of the landscaping,to be valid for a period of three (3) years from the date that the installation of landscaping is completed. This device is to be provided to the satisfaction of the City Attorney prior to the issuance of site preparation/building permits. 2. Staff recommend that the Hearing Examiner approve the proposed conditional use permit for the Village Place North Office/Commercial complex(File No.078-90)with the following conditions: a. The applicant shall comply with all conditions established by the Environmental Review Committee on January 4, 1991. NOTE: Pursuant to the Environmental Review Committee's requirement for limited construction/hauling hours during site development, staff will recommend to the Building Division that: a) construction be limited to hours between 7:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m.;and b) hauling be permitted only between the hours of 8:30 a.m.to 3:30 p.m.and 6:30 p.m.to 10:00 p.m. i • prelmrpt a--- 3 ao ��_.i,,,lky, .i ,,.l.. ,- r r •s hlf l •{. 11 1, i, • . II'IIi roo I :�. ` : _�,W„ uji gip , i . 7\ ...... . y. 1. 11 A- sIQF'It 1j� . -.: Q,s _ -- Q I . s ' I - '1 •`` 1 y... y j. A.� + ii 12_ \4 i, • fas tt S T • an -1 , '1 \\ L ~-- I ,lr rr r7' y P ~ • Si . III tit; „ i I' 1i'` ' ' !l 41 e e 5 • it Q` I I •i y ail 1 li • . ?- -1 .s' , W I —2 ii i • i. I I s 1.s ... \ \` \ �'` i „i;t-r-tlr— Of‘ s3W i� a I,:• J, If 1D \ \ O �1Q` • s - I E" a 1.1 G :o I1 \. \ • S' ' Jl 1� I'LI..... • ,7 ., ___„.......4 + \ \ «I . .iriMIG . \ Akia,...... ,tom' 7i----v...- .. -- — e �+,I .1w 'i.:.. Ili I1 �n '1li� I•, Cam' t . ,_, . /1... . . ‘....1,,,:i., ....irm_.1:,.. - __.= - `'I`ts� I I ;ago .' ( ' i, w : ,,,,, I ,,� .!�.. 1 i ` III. .I I • ,, /.. ^' • • ; fit ;�. 1 I I I 1 ' :/ ,. . 'F(1)14 •'. ii.l1 Z ` I • 1 rI I® �I- ,11 Ifl. 1, I\ / �! �I,N v1 L.A:Epl. �" • +05 • . R,- • `INT�R� .101, III11, --7-- --'.-•'' . ' •ok war I' i...•gm NEM i 1 R-41. \ • 1 ' mit... ., ' Renton Village Associates • ECF:SA:CU-078i-'90 APPLICANT Renton Village Associates/Call ison_ ' TOTAL AREA . 14+-,acres ' Partnership PRINCIPAL ACCESS South Grady Way; Lake Avenue . 'EXISTING ZONING B-1 , Commercial Use. • 'EXISTING USE Vacant land; commercial use PROPOSED USE office building • COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN Commercial Use • COMMENTS Located at Renton Village Center/South Grady Way • y L ,..__. --,,-, LAND USE.. EMENT .4:iiii.i- -- ....:.,, . _-_-- ,,,.:.i::.-c.0...0:::::...s.n..::.::....L..„.:.:..:::..,...I'ii i.•71, I ' . . radii •0.3*'lc, r ..„, • \-1 • . • :::: : . ...., ..,, • ,,,,....... • . . • . Commercial Single Family '°°°°°'I 1.. ,.., ii.., . I : 1 ...0.10%.0000:„........:,,,Jural. ., 1 14 ::-""'"";•• ......:.........1:.:.:..4.,„.,,:i..,....11,41:.....r, •:•:•,•:•:.:•:•:., • ._,.•,,,,...„,.. / . .. • . • . o:::::::::::::.: L w Density . . • 1.'07i y .iiili::::.........., •_.• ..:::::::::::::: . Office / Office.Park • . -, 5,,,,,,*::::::::(4.......1.----- ..:::::::::::: . .....,...2. *•::i*::::::::::: • Multl.,Family .• • • • r. ::::: • 'al•.:•:•:.:: on' • ,• I ii I/ • • .r. ••••• •41,Jk.1:::1 )Nr.,740--0 • ,• • •,„ •.••••• .• . • • . (iiiiimifi._•___,..?,t... ..i::-• r. . • . . • • :• X::::::::::. '••••,----••• ••-•:"-- ., •••:•:•:...•ANNE ,..- .0000000 . Medium Density " ........ .0.0............ Public/Quasi-Public• . •••••••• ''e. ' :iiiiiiiiiii.felt •---m 1 i:''..:13 I •••••••••••••• •Multi-Family ....Do.. • • • '._. ::x:i:i NEI It 1 ,....„............„:„.......... ........ • • •• • ,.,1' .:::i*: -.,-- _,_,Liimil ••••••••••••• • • ...: .::::. • . .• .. , . • • • • ••!, F I NMI (ATV 0111r01111P . • • •• • re : 0 0• Ole ........,......... ' ' • 0•PO ••'"••t .................. ...,...........„„„ , ................ .................., .......-...........- High Density • Light Industrial .........................„:„..... ................... 4posio 1...:::_; • ,:m*:::::::,::::::::::i . Multi-Family i.....-.......:::i jb --11111111.--__mmum*,....: :......0...._,j:rasog.....00, • • •, • ...., \ . . , . . 1• • • • • •• . • • • •' • (.3 , - o) ' • ' i• • • b • :.,. .., • • • • ' "VA Recreation • •••••• Heavy Industrial i•••••••••• ..e,., ii,„ id ...-, - • • • • • • , • . 1 , 4 o..., , . • I• • • •.,• ,. 2..1 iilkoboarip•/,//„. .0.0. , . • , • . . , - .. • . . . II • • i-'4 • •CO • . 47 .°.•0 0 0 Greenbelt. -=-=-------= Manufacturing Park I •-,(1..trylit itrAtto,1110 . 00000c ?Q•••G• 4. -----•- '1. :''';'' ..,‘ --.' 4 e"!•••:.:7•7•:::;:•:::-.7,"• .i iiii / Multiple. Option •Tri , ,, ..,...• ,... 9 ..„,„, ,,,::::::::.::::,..,:,:„„„„„,::::„ . ,...0.00, ---- ' . . ill IN • .,...,...,,,,,,..,....., . ..... . .....:.::::•: 00000000000000000, / . .,, „ ::::::•••••:•••:•%:•i•:•• %., :•:•:•:•:•:'• ••••••••••:•:•:•:•: 000000000 •.•••............. .... ..............„„ • -•sot '0'0'140'0'0'6 4•: •:0J-A.; 7- .wig=MIA IL ta• ••,..e, •..„,• ••::::::::::::::.,.,....,.... .:... .............„:„.„ o„.00.00, _• . 'o., •2,if, .00000 0 0000000,,,, • •00. 00 000 ••• • • 01 •„,._ ,. ,., 0 0 0.0 00000.0..... ....... NI 111 Wly &.04 IiiiiiiNi"i'' ci.. -••::::igiii;;iii;i:i: :i:i: •.°0°09393°093cOT 4.0.. VII ..,.i • • •':':':'•••••••••:•:':.:*:':':':':':':* 00000000. • 0 0 0 k14/64.• pit .g.g.g00000000gogog. 4„.. ...) ., ...•.•, ,•.. . .. „..,. ,... :.:.:.:.:.:.:.:........:.:.:.:.: ..„„.....) •1 i •rreiiii ...'.' •::::::::m.::::::::::::::::::. 013 0 0000000g 0g0g02,030. ., IP"- '. '; '-4 .k;"111441:11:11101 all Al'i • , . ..o.... e ......:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:......... *4•1:I a 461141•64 41:1114/1: .Oldtit& , :11:::!.....,:i--1,- wIr.• caw. i.t .iiIiiiiiiiiiii::iiiiiiii:. •,,c,o,,c,or,ocl - .111111111111k L...Nktovow itAltriliKW-':- .---.---:. l'iiiiitle":11:r... .,-77 /: a ' MI .40...iiiimilmoi -•.(ftf.,.11.,.. •*.goSogo l• li....4413t ...,, ...0-, e, ,i, 1; ...00000ov. , , Illir -.. It:a lifill'*S°11,52,4°S. ;;:lialliiit.. •,f4Cy I te : I •• o o o o o .•inivelimop,r•,.. . „, , . Iv ,4.,.. ::::.:.:::::::::::::::...:::::::::.::::::::..::::.::::::::::::..iiii.:1..:..:.:.:..:..:.:.:....::.: ...0.0.0.opoo:,,,,.. ,,•,, '."7 4.;'' lirt iniiirlii 3.2°g°g°2°2°lL•11:::::::::5 Ok.00.0..,....., ......uth:694,.ICi.::.4.F!4%4:\,,h;.4C-.0.1::::1 ?iiiiiiiii ::::::::::::::•:•::::::::.i .,.'r , : -.----•*•••-'''47•......m• • - ,••mb..4 3 . a. 1 ...„6,.n03,,,,,::::,,......,0,:;•:•:•:::::::::.::::::a.,..c,....,,,..,::::.a..:1;;;::::,: ..."' '41.14114.1..:.% 'in.. ''-iiiiiiiiilli illiiiiilik°,°?/:--.,....,.iii N i i., .•, - ank•;.g:1:0 .•::i;iiW ”. ',.:•:•:•:•:," ,;..3 VI. ..;•"..,0 ' 1'4(1.1.1k71.q ei:(.7.3C''14'.e,'1:;4t4t • ef-.. . i:i:1::::,.. wp,,,,,10: ".,7%4:11fait. .,-.,,-...i.:-iiii--- • gi9;;;;;;;Miliii ill 1P,;.:',.i'e I.'fcri-.t... 1,. ,' 1 ,.:!,,(3,v-,,,:,p:,,,,u;€0....•r•art,l,r,ri) aiii;,.4),•,%).:1.0.I 1:1,i,-70'44',I', . .(..)No..' ) c)• •.•L.7•1t.%, ii;.41111 .OEM1 eKIK:Ia. :EL _ lligilijong .1••,:.t.".51.-` •Yilt,iierv;(•-cV 61.1-44: ".(,•:66',';)'::.?'';',.'^`;1`9''''''''''' -'A • - .4: r''.'.1:;; ' • \‘'.. / Air • ill'ANIMMIIIIIL'r RIDIF.H111111111111/:.al!•11121,1! e.j.0,V...;, •,,,....citts01.4 im. ..:',0 i.....,-,4.4;r,ej.,1.1. . ' A. .110141a t CV;..?i i:?•(f F,.:A;:r..q.11',*f'; II'. 1' 111.2i I 0...V..1::••iidii iiiiN:913 ft.44P; •04'aivc, • ..-: 44E.,- ' 41:.1"• Ilk •r'''''?.E's) ---------------,.. r ....::: : : :.. ... ri.,:::*inlaiiiiIi'r -. .-1. ..!:Q...,.-4A.A,..\---4 _.,,,,c, -.....-04 .I.A. ..,.„., i: , P.J. 4, ••'°•''' 4>•'''':-.." :6 -10--/M0-=---2--- r '•-.1--"wi :1 - .........„ i.. 1 ii.::m:HM:: :: .Pr .dir QRiMMEgnifi.s4Prit II L. ..°I'• • IA3.12.41.4i:I' `.1•;••:P:1416•V•Z;;6: •••••Oh 40 .4),ft '.iV*9•0414;c;1):9.'0...'fl' ,I•VP :tel..; 0` • . kl .411 ::1::::i:ii:::::,::::,:::::::::::::::::,:::::::!::::::::::,,,:::::::::,:::.:1 i la.1. F . L:IT t .A.r.''•••...t.L.• -...".,,,,,A ...,., - - •' , , . • 1 c• • "..... 's oo•- ' .-------7----:71:-:•-=:: ------.- : -- -7-7- - -- 0000000• , .------_ - ......_„....__ 0000000000 •,..,,, ____ -fiiiii. ,•..,.... .._-.-.,,,„a.„ ll 'ocic. !!!. •. I •,.• ....e •••••.....f c7.1 .. Pr.:..d•III I : 7: .. / I .00000 v 0000•..-..,.....:0.00.000.. tip ....p...,,.,....,b. 3 10..01 0'?,?•tN \ "ii•RI'1"• ''•("‘.4.( i.....1,*::Al '( lr. 4•Z )3 4••••RI.SY.on"....1 l'ill,t 4 1 14 41:`'..,..f•te.:(v.',b di,-..v.•P.tft t• •-..tat, - 0- 1 a t)• 4.••i• t1l) , • 1 P•Fel..ijl‘...i&• .ft 0. %•,. 1/4.,,t,.„t.,... ..•00 •t 10 03 0 ,..,4,:p ccni v.,..0 i g i • 44,10 ,r, . . ..c.,f.„..4':.0.:A.i:ig„.(41.-.A°••!,()%•%•••4 4-..0::,(gm:1M', ?s.,,,:4.irk t? .. ?.:-.1). )'kit•' a.• •o°°3°040°4332°.0::.4••k.'''---E2.7.---117--_:: :- -- :::---' 1----- --..1;-"----. i I r i.1--":"'1 4/''',& f•01,A --A•R7 .' eTi:us:. '1• •:;•;•;";.,,4Z`''..!..,'sli.,4.,::.•i',,,1..:6"'0..w.•'0:441'4'4;k' v'• •• -i• c..:.0 0 c.r)0 0 0000009s:,-.s.„:.,----_- ,,,,- loge,-:11F-47-1'" 4 ....... .i iii> „• . „.. )0°093°0°0°0°80°0,:,0.:,,a••- ------ ::,ai-le•.1.t.0 IP'-at_ r-4--•O'lr 1,,,, ••••i'.I,,.4,2 . s,,..,.,...k,;ipOro.•44..e .....400.0.0 „It. . • •::;iwir.i:iiiiiii:i:. ,...c,c,c,c,..,)„.c,,,,:•.-7„,,, L.11:45_, --- ,,- 0 - a , .si,.,, .•S.• . •00000. .0000000000000 . „,...., ., .40 or atilr.- 00000000000.•• --- _ --ii_sti: . • W'.'' ' 6.{)::.! o°00°. ',..'.‘ 0 0000 '•0000000. 111161 .2.01""".- lElii.966 MI :..7.1...s•:.,,r.,:,...,:::;:r:111.7.{.;% Vo°0°. 1.4).•N, ..0•A il •00000.. .1,4 • • -.-- .003 .7....w...,„„air-Kig_ . .•°094v.-... .• se :_ .._._------------'_ ,,.. I...QM'.:•:•:.:.:•:,..:•:•:•:.:•:..•:.::.:.:.:.:.•CI " '1I'.1).* .• .. ---\- ' • ,•••• • . "-'-'•. ---- IN W-11V,I..11° IIIIIkES...,,- .i:::4:110§..Aiiiiii:•:iii.i.i.,‘.,„.,,.,„,,.gno.:.,,;;-.:..,;..',.t;,0 , ..0 *,•:',>,e,--, .. ...," 1--Irilr, "%VW= "-9 • I) 44 ' --%'::::•:•:•:•:•:,...- al „INT.. ;i 1:k.,,,,. 0000000. "'N../ •17. ' .. 4. %:*::::;:: '' .1 I 0 AMY.• le .43000• ..iir. .0. •,, •000 0. \ 0111,---aravi.., -_:_:_-=_-=_-_-_______ _______-____:.. .,.." • 1.•••••• •,:t. : .Alru .11:11:1,4, -- AKE -=-=-=-=7--I CY.; Mr • •.09;, .:i*i*:$,... ,,, 1 1 1 Nitito 4 In ,,e-t, •i 1, , v. __ ._ •000,._____1 .1,3, ti, .c,„,• ,.1:::::...c.:.:.:.::........1 a Ilropi t I,. ...• •:•:•:::::::::::::•...0t. I '111•1 II A .. •,•11:1 . .... a.__ _ _____ ______L...5;3,.:f.. . :%.:::::*i:i::::::.::::::..• 4161 ob.......mom 14.,• -1 .-?: •i sin is 4111:1141411114 II '. . .. ...........:,:::„. ,,._,. ino.,000.., • .0c....0. .1 lc :4300000. 11.1111%p 47 • mi3zoili-.... i cv,.. is.•.......pm 1 1 i•••:• ‘,,,, www.----twimitimunot .':,..„-.: ,wc,•0•0 (....,..4,.'1; . . 000.00 oc,c,o• ..,_.• r, :•••••• 0000000 .00000. ' vri 11 a .;011111 I! .000000• • •••• . 000000 . ..4. III .0.0000000. 'f.:.•.11.• d:;, . •000000• ' :::::::).?•;... '111 ---------- ---------- - -'1:-. . .. 1.1*.16 1 •- • 1 j.:;•":„. i .-1.s.f.'8 tr,:::7:- ------------------->- -- 11'.-• W. ' ' • k.S...':!.•..ii r'. - As. I • • II1 I:IIII I I 11111 l';'..1.:; ...:-::;:?, -7:-=-:1--:::::::::::::- =It_ c t; 1 e• . •/.„44tilib, ,:r:.:.. fill ) •1 re• .0)‘...a. ,..,.1.0 ,'•,P.er9?••;;;:f'..4.. -7-------:------------- ----- .6''"r• I 'I; $ ,'...-•,;.2.t 1.:1 r v...0-k.- :-vta......,•:-.0',:•:: ; -_-_-__-_-_-_-_-_- _-_-_ ,ed. , Wilt. r) ,Itti,414 F., 'CY •V----------------1- .0.:,:j1 a:31.0•r•:".,. ----------------- ----- ^.'. I ",'., ,..., . • ::g;":„...-E-E.:-:-=--1.--H----- '74..:•i?',';i'..S. . • _-_-_,---....-_-_:-_-_,_ ::-.=-_. .•:=1'.. ,,., gill I iiii$1)',..1 I i.ok • -•-----:"..:-=---77=-1.7----------- -.=-::-::.---:--::::--:.-- ----- !fit-' ;-..• • •A. •,,. 4888e -. ,_.•1 s r. ...v_t.r..._.•.-,•s..”•r•air 1 ---". i :.::::.::::.::.;::.ii.::::.:::::::::.::.i:;:.:..r...:;;;:;.,ilk '::.'.' .w.w.:.:.:.:.'dimil NI .-. ......... . \444114....106,. - "*" 7, ,,,hicksitiL _-_-_-4, --pir 2, 7__-....'•-•-.----- ---- r....s.i. ad :::• :03::11 • ;IL . : V' ;'` -------- ---- -- ' -:-:-:::. -1-L.--.:=-7-:-.=------ \1 ,,_m....__..... __ 1.......-::1: 'P..%,•••.r.••:.• .•:•:.: f::::::::::::::::::::44. ....... I MIL I 1111:111111 11 111.11111b7.'• • • i '. 'OV1TSV. !P .14"••„ 1• •:".-,1; .., - • .. -----_-__ --_.:.-•-:_1 1! •,':,--_--_-: --_-_-_--_-7 _----:_-_--_-_--_-, in.:-E......-.•Ed.-7 I 1 1 1 1 ii 0'0000000:00:005:000:00000:00000000:00000000%;,3_.- f.,,.., .,. , , ..... 0 01:41rdr),...v_44pattragia.i. "-I.111103:11'0 „Al 1 . ' 1 ---- '''.14P---7514:i.., fitiri,-e--=-7--=,::::=::11:1, 0000009%00000.%. •.r. . el .,•,:: ,00 .. , .„,_ •..,..- ,.,,s-0,. -... ::::::_ram.....", -,--__--__--:::110111.•••••=112:11 .0000:00130:00o:o00:3::. ....lib; ......,....x:1.::1::.j.:.:,,c:::3::::.::::::::::%1. win •n .,A• . .. ---7 1 .•----,or 9k ' .77.--7 . .-..-. :•,-.1-r,4-::-.:7-..-.---4 .*i:i :-... '.44...,,,,•,..:. 1-'7'' . '''' . • F'Po°0.°0.°0.°0.•'.°0 :°°0 °•' "=;.1,5 .,as • , ':• . 2, •;, • . . . I . '093°093°:•'0%%°09?; ::i:i ::::::: •••s=04•7,•' • :;'• 1 ...,.. • -•• • . • ' I : 2 t • - 1 , .--------- • \ • • •00000•000.0' .Z. •• . 0,.:,,,,,,....:,,.•,. •00000000 ...J. ' "... -.,Wed ':.iti:7 . , ...i, , 1 , . \ :, .:,....:opoo.•;V ,F.,, ..!..,..,.„ . :,31,...,,, . .•il'' 7. 1 ...._.,7.,.. 1 . 1 • , , ..a.' ,:a. .::::::..:.::7..‘ ' •'4d.„-• >- ••••!.::::::::::.:.: p,•;j3,, - - , :AL ,. ...1 • -.I,;:A;• . .,,,, • \ E. .*.:.:.:-:-:.:.•.•.• ,..., • . . W E , "-?)" 'NO . • • ..“ ' i • ' 41 ••i- %V: . . . 1 I . It • .• IL 4... .). I '.:. 1 , , ... .T. '011%.°A 1.1*• • :v9smitit,' k 4r1%� - ( ..... . .... •••..•.,•v•. DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST NO.: ECF-078-90 • APPLICATION NO(S): CU;SA;V-078-90 • PROPONENT: Renton Village Associates i PROJECT NAME: Village Place North 1 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Applicant seeks: 1) site plan approval for development of a new 260,363 square foot office/retail sales building (with a conditional use permit to address the fact that this complex, proposed to be ten stories/133 feet in height will exceed the height limit allowed for the structure under the Zoning Ordinance; 2) site plan approval for construction of a five level (1396 space) parking .,garage to supplement the existing 261 spaces to be retained; 3) site plan approval for renovation (Including partial demolition) of an existing retail center now on the subject property and for renovation of services areas; and 4) a variance for the construction of a new private roadway to serve the development. The proposed development also includes Improvements to existing on-site amenities (e.g., landscaping, ingress/egress routes,and parking). A second phase of this project is to be proposed for development at a future date; this phase is tentatively planned to include 115,000 square feet of office/retail space. The City will require that Phase II undergo complete environmental and land use review at the time of application submittal. The projects'lhave been allowed to be separated because the phases are not functionally Interdependent. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Renton Village Center/South Grady Way . LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Development Planning Section , The!City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). Conditions were imposed as mitigation measures by the Environmental Review Committee under their authority;of Section 4-6-6 Renton Municipal Code (see attached sheet). These conditions are necessary to mitigate environmental impacts identified during the environmental review process. ., Thi , Determination of Non-Significance - Mitigated (DNS-M) is issued under WAC 197-11-340(2). Because mitigation measures have been Imposed, the lead agency will not act on this proposal for fifteen (15) days from November 27, 1990. Any interested party may submit written comments which must be submitted by 5:00 p.m., December 12, 1990,,in order to be onsidered. A fourteen (14) day appeal period will commence following the finalization of the DNS-M. Res onsibie Official: Environmental Review Committee c/o Don Erickson, Secretary Development Services Division • Department of Planning/Building/Public Works 200 Mill Avenue South Renton,WA 98055 PUBLICATION DATE: November 27, 1990 DATE OF DECISION: N�'�^ r 21 t 1990 1 SIGNATURES: / d...y.... ._....._____ Lyn A. G an Administrator !DATE I q0 n Departme'.f PI nning/Building/Public Works Joh, ebley,Actministrfor DATE ' CO, unity Service Depament ee' a er, Flre C d e/ p.,, / DATE Re on ire Department mlleIg 1110, ' , ' 1 DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED REVISED MITIGATION MEASURES DECEMBER 21, 1990 PROJECT: Village Place North PROPONENT: Renton Village Associates ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST: ECF-078-90 APPLICATION NUMBER: CU;SA;V-078-90 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Applicant seeks: 1) site plan approval for development of a new 260,363 square foot office/retail sales building (with a conditional use permit to address the fact that this complex, proposed to be ten stories/133 feet in height will exceed the height limit allowed for the structure under the Zoning Ordinance; 2) site plan approval for construction of a five level (1396 space) parking garage to supplement the existing 261 spaces to be retained;3) site plan approval for renovation (including partial demolition) of an existing retail center now on the subject property and for renovation of services areas; and 4) a variance for the construction of a new private roadway to serve the development. The proposed development also Includes Improvements to existing on-site amenities (e.g., 'landscaping, Ingress/egress routes, and parking). A second phase of this project is to be proposed for development at a future date; this phase Is tentatively planned to Include 115,000 square feet of office/retail space. The City will require that Phase II undergo complete environmental and land use review at the time of application submittal. The projects have been allowed to be separated because the phases are not functionally interdependent. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Renton Village Center/South Grady Way RECOMMENDATIONS: The Environmental,Review Committee issued a Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated with the following conditions: 1. The applicant shall,In order to address aesthetic impacts, revise the landscape plan to include more significant landscaping around the southwestern facade of the five story parking garage in order to soften its apparent bulk, with a conceptual plan to be approved to the satisfaction of the Planning/Building/Public Works Department and the Fire Department prior to public hearing for site plan/conditional use review and a specific plan to be approved to the satisfaction of the Planning/Building/Public Works Department and the Fire Department prior to issuance of site preparation/building permits and with landscaping to be Installed prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. 2. The applicant shall, In order to address light/glare impacts, prepare a solar glare diagram for those hours of the day on the equinox, summer, and winter solstices when the angle of reflected sunlight is at an angle of 30 degrees or less with the horizon, in order that staff can ascertain whether reflected glare is likely to Impact 1-405 or Grady Way traffic. This diagram shall be submitted to the Development Planning Section at least two weeks prior to public hearing, so that staff can ascertain whether mitigation measures should be recommended to the Hearing Examiner for Tight/glare management. 3. The applicant, in order to address transportation system Impacts, shall: a) directly provide improvements proposed for the Grady Way Benefit Zone, to the satisfaction of the Transportation Systems Division, prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy for this development; OR b) make a contribution of $436,758.32 to the (pending) Grady Way Transportation Benefit Zone, prior to the Issuance of site preparation/building permits. 4. The applicant, in order to address local transportation system impacts, shall provide Improvements to the south leg of the intersection of South Grady Way and Lake Avenue South, including: a) designated travel lanes as presented on the site plans submitted by the applicant (dated October, 1990): and b) Improvements to slgnalization (e.g., equipment relocation) at the Grady Way/Lake Avenue Intersection to ensure safe, efficient__functioning to those designated travel lanes. These plans shall be approved by the Transportation Systems Division, prior to the Issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy for the subject development. mitmeas- 1 • 5. The applicant, In order to address local transportation system impacts, shall provide Improvements to street lighting (replacement of mercury vapor lighting units with sodium vapor units) along the south side of Grady Way South extending from Lake Avenue to the eastern boundary of the site,to the satisfaction of the Department, prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy for the subject development. 6. The applicant, in order to address local transportation system impacts, shall make a contribution in the amount of$4,000.00 as a fair share payment toward a study to be conducted by the City to: 1). determine the feasibility of improving the Grady Way eastbound right turn lane (to open this lane up to through traffic from Rainier Avenue to Talbot Roadi; and 2) determine the feasibility of improving the intersection of Talbot Road South/South Grady Way, through channelization Improvements (e.g., curbs, signalization, elimination of right turn trap at the south leg of the Intersection). This contribution should be provided to the satisfaction of the Transportation Systems Division prior to the issuance of the first site preparation/building permits for the subject development. In the event that this study determines that improvement is feasible, and the City elects to install modifications, the applicant will be called upon to provide a fair share contribution to this improvement, 'with the maximum fee assessment based upon the 2873 ADWVTE estimate for this development)with the cost of the study credited as a portion of the fair share contribution. 7. The applicant shall, in order to address transportation system impacts, provide a Transportation Management Plan, including (but not limited to): a) provision of van pool/car pool systems, preferential parking for HOVs, fee-for-parking plan for employees, subsidized bus passes, public transit and ride-sharing information materials, a bus shelter, "kiss-and-ride"facilities, bicycle lanes, bicycle parking plans, and a fair share contribution to a study exploring the feasibility•of implementing a shuttle service to the site from the local residential community; b) a system/fees for monitoring of the TMP to determine its level of functioning and to make necessary modifications (such as relocation of preferential parking); and c) an implementation scheduler to serve the new office/retail complex. Facilities plans shall be developed to the satisfaction of the Planning/Building/Public Works Department and METRO, prior to issuance of site preparation/building permits. Service plans shall be developed to the satisfaction of the Planning/Building/Public Works Department and METRO, prior to issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy. Facilities and services shall be implemented at the time of occupancy of the first structure. (Note 7.1: if, after having had In place an effective TMP for two years, the applicant can demonstrate the need for additional parking, he can request release of the reserved parking. It shall be the responsibility of the Planning/Building/Public Works Administrator to release sections or all of the parking places held in reserve.) 8. The applicant shall, in order to address transportation system Impacts and public safety, provide a parking plan which includes, but is not limited to: a) placement of twenty percent of the 1432 parking spaces required for the office facility in reserve (with the reserve parking spaces to, be shelled off on the top level of the parking garage); b) reserved parking areas on the roof of Ithe • garage,with landscaping, seating and a jogging trail in those reserved areas); c) establishment of a system for assigning parking for retail consumers, vendors and visitors to the office complex to outside areas and the lower level of the garage,with signage indicating those spaces which are so reserved and restricting parking to specified periods; d) construction of load/unload areas next to the skybridge at the second level of the garage; e) establishment of a system for assigning upper levels of the garage to employees, with signage indicating those areas which are so reserved, and with a security system (controlled access, lighting, emergency service phones, etc.); and f) provision of a total of 29 handicapped parking stalls to serve employees, consumers and visitors-- with those spaces serving the office building to be adjacent to the skybridge and those spaces serving the retail area to be Immediately adjacent to the retail center. These plans shall be established in concept, to the satisfaction of Planning/Building/Public Works, the Police Department and the Fire Department, prior to the public hearing for site plan/conditional use review. Specific plans shall be approved to the satisfaction of Planning/Building/Public Works,the Police Department and the Fire Department, prior to the issuance of site preparation/building permits, and shall be installed prior to issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy. (NOTE 8.1: The applicant is encouraged to install a hydraulic elevator in the parking garage for the convenience/safety of employees,visitors and vendors.) 9. The applicant shall, in order to address impacts to earth and storm water management impacts, develop a storm drainage plan and flood protection plan (including elevation of all structures a minimum of two feet above the flood plain and providing compensatory water storage areas on site), based upon the Surface and Storm Water Management Ordinance. The conceptual storm water management plan must be submitted at least two weeks prior to the public hearing for the project and approved by the Storm Water Engineering Section in advance of that hearing. A specific storm water management plan shall be approved by the Storm Water Engineering Section prior to Issuance of site preparation/building permits. 2 mitmeas-2 (Note 9.1: The applicant may elect to address storm drainage management exclusively through on-site retention/detention or may develop a plan for routing water to the Panther Creek Wetlands. If the wetlands are to receive water from this site,the plan for conveyance and/or deposit must be approved by the State Departments of Fisheries and Ecology, the Army Corps and related agencies. The Storm Water Engineering Section will take responsibility for,coordination of plan review with federal,state and local agencies, as necessary.) 10. ' The applicant shall, in order to address Impacts to earth and storm water management, provide a "hold harmless" agreement which acknowledges that the City has Informed the applicant that the subject property is located in an area which may be Included in an existing/altered 100 year flood plain, and that the applicants have decided to proceed, at their own volition, thereby waiving their rights to hold the municipality liable for any flooding and/or for any damages to property or person arising from such flooding. This document Is to be approved by the Storm Water Engineering Section and the City Attorney, and to be duly recorded prior to the Issuance of site preparation/building permits. 11. The applicant shall, in order to address on-site recreation impacts, provide a plan for interior recreation areas (with shower facilities in the office/retail building, for use by employees ). This plan shall be approved, in concept, by Planning/Building/Public Works prior to public hearing for project review. Specific plans shall be approved by the Planning/Building/Public Works Department, prior to Issuance of site preparation/building permits; facilities shall be installed prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for the building. 12. The applicant shall, in order to address community recreation Impacts, provide: a) a plan for development and Implementation of off-site recreation Improvements to the satisfaction of the Parks and Recreation Department; OR b) make a voluntary contribution of $20,000.00 to the development of community recreational facilities (Comprehensive Parks Plan, Master Trails Plan), in order to mitigate recreation Impacts. In the event that the applicant opts to provide off-site improvements directly, these shall be installed prior to issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy. In the event that the applicant prefers to make a contribution, fees shall be provided prior to issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy. 13. The applicant shall develop a Construction Management Mitigation Plan that addresses: a) hours of operation, b) hauling routes, c) staging areas, d) employee and contractor parking, e) erosion control,f) the disposal of hazardous materials associated with soils remediation/construction,and g) signage identifying construction areas in order to facilitate timely provision of emergency services. A.conceptual plan shall be submitted at least two weeks in advance of public hearing for the complex, and shall be approved by the Planning/Building/Public Works Department and Fire Prevention Bureau prior to that hearing. Specific plans shall be approved by the Planning/Building/Public Works Department and the Fire Prevention Bureau prior to issuance of site preparation/building permits. (NOTE: In conjunction with land use review, staff may recommend modifications'to site plans and landscaping plans to achieve full compliance with Code requirements and additional conditions to ensure adequate functioning of the development (e.g., covenant for joint use of parking areas and amenities, landscaping maintenance bonds.) (NOTE: The applicant will be required:to make all Code mandated off-site and on-site Improvements, including sidewalks, curbs, gutters, street lighting, utility lines, and utility system fees prior to issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy.) • mitmeas-3 1 IF REVISIONS, ROUTED WITH .. .•' PREVIOUS PLANS AND COMMENTS. GREEN NO. C C) 5,1 - 0 7 ` T o CITY OF RENTON BUILDING DIVISION PLAN REVIEW ROUTING SLIP DATE 6 2-6i^ Vd APPLICANT: C a4f/ itivihne 1i U l//� /9cr Yr1't JOB , /, ADDRESS: / 5 5. 6 47 Pv (Amy y NATURE OF WORK: 5 f0�_�_ gP 4(Cf//Q r TO: Comments Due Comments Due 1 1 FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU 1 I BUILDING CODE REVIEW I WATER SYSTEMS 1 1 ENERGY CODE 1 .. 1 SEWER SYSTEMS 1 1 STORM DRAIN SYSTEMS. 1 1 TRANSPORTATION DIVISION 1 1 PLANNING DIVISION 1 1 OTHERS 1 1 MECHANICAL Comments/suggestions should be provided in writing. Please provide comments to the Building Division by 5: 00 p.m. on above date. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION /M N , V/,(i(i I 1 APPROVED 1 1 APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED w 41.6'/M ,IN //tli'alu4/ SA/PS 14 /C L1(6 ;S. r)/ e)g7 iN 0$4 m5- /// -/f _/r,bf a wmi j fLAN ( 47'Y-c/64,f 7y1--- iAg y) WE ECOMtit , fy I°14 ES SS1N A � r rly p VEz_0V s QVlcss p/jo/Q To ibI-s1(N olc `ogopose_40 (/ j`I L 1 7`r s y s /14 . 0661 L z d3S NOIMMO ONINN1rid .. 1L I G'LL'LL�-7Z���" _ DATE ( �G / e�C) Signat'dre it ctor or Authorized Representative forms#2 :p1 r v CDVbld022(2/13/90) I x &A PLICATION: C) DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET 10/< C1 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET C1 PLO REVIEW ROUTING SLI/ if Cam' OTHER • • D E: 9-/1-90 • APPLICANT: - 1 . JOB ADDRESS: NATURE OF WORK: fc�44L.., • VRPROPERTY MANAGEMENT Pt0 Ae DATE RECEIVED • Commen D e BY PROPERTY MGMT. Comments or suggestions regarding this application should be provided in writing. Please provide comments to the Comm. Dev. Dept. (C.D.D.) by 5:00 p.m. on above date. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION WL/411 /144L"dr44414424- EcEES APPLIED 0 CANNOT APPLY FEES O LEGAL DESCRIPTION -y- NEED MORE INFORMATION 0 SQUARE FOOTAGE .riat4e...1 . �''ti��# i O FRONT FOOTAGE /4.4..e.A,L44.4•1--e-71-1-e-t-sa-1 Q:-/9-90 St,/30/4/esT ❑VICINITY MAP It is the intent of this development fee analysis to put the developer/owner on notice, that the fees quoted below will apply to the subject site upon development of the property. All quoted fees are due and payable at the time the construction permit is issued to install the on-site and off-site improvements (i .e. underground utilities, street improvements, etc.) PROJECT COST LATECOMER • LATECOMER AGREEMENT - WATER NO PER. FTG. FEE CITY HELD .--a •••• PRIVATE DEVELOPER HELD _ a - LATECOMERS AGREEMENT - SEWER • CITY HELD —p PRIVATE DEVELOPER HELD .. A SPECIAL UTILITY CONNECTION CHARGE - WATER UNITS SUCC FEE Single family residential dwelling unit $300/lot x Apartment. Condo, each multiplex unit $175/ea, unit x Commercial/Industrial E.pd/sq. ft. of property x Zi g1,76Oat e'iloi ?ci/. / ,fie A/Z60 SPECIAL UTILITY CONNECTION CHARGE - SEWER Single family residential dwelling unit $300/lot x Apartment, condo, each multiplex unit $175/ea, unit x Commercial/Industrial S.9K�� l p.t, of property x i 1o0 4 ,et ,27, VE SPECIAL ASSESSMENT D STRICT (Hospital Area) WATER UNITS SAD FEE DEVELOPMENTS WITH 150 GPM FJ1E FLOWS OR LESS: Area Charge $0. 4 p9t` sq,ft. x Frontage Charge /O0 per front ft. .x DEVELOPMENTS WITH GREA . THAN 1500 GPM FIRE FLOWS; Area Charge $0 48 er sq.ft. x Frontage Char a $18, 0 per front ft. x SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT (Honey Crk. Intercptr) - SEWER UNITS SAD FEE AREA CHARGES: Residential d 11ing its, apartments or equivalen ► ; $2 0 per dwelling unit x Commercial deve op nt: • $.05 per sq.ft. , gross site area x FRONT FOOTAGE CHARGE $37.19 per Fr, t F , (on ea. side) x . $74.38 per fr,ft. (p otv .on both sides of imprv.) x — o — TOTAL: S 2/3 3/. 4qt • The above quoted fees do NOT include inspection fees, side sewer permits, r/w permit fees or the cost of water meters. ,ilc � y-/.0= „� Q 0 • al..././.4.4./L_Af ► /4,'/ • DATE � Signature of Director or Authorized Re tative 9 P •� 1 * i �.r." ieAPPLICATION: v E] DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Cl ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET �'PLA REVIEW ROUTING SLIP 4 Atel OTHER D E: 9-/i4 90 • APPLICANT: ... J . JOB ADDRESS: • NATURE OF WORK: L QIPROPERTY MANAGEMENT P P♦C,t DA E RECEIVED • Commen D e BY PROPERTY MGMT. Comments or suggestions regarding this application should be provided in writing. Please provide comments to the Comm. Dev. Dept. (C.D.D.) by 5:00 p.m. on above date. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISIONc:04,41,11tG FEES APPLIED 0 CANNOT APPLY FEES 0 LEGAL DESCRIPTION 14/8-444•1 NEED MORE INFORMATION ❑ SQUARE FOOTAGE �� O FRONT FOOTAGE pt;t4,ii,e4.4...4...../.#46.-te-ta...it91.-/9-.9zo 4 ❑VICINITY MAP It is the intent of this development fee analysis to put the developer/owner on notice, that the fees quoted below will apply to the subject site upon development of the property. All quoted fees are due and payable at the time the construction permit is issued to install the on-site and off-site improvements (i .e. underground utilities, street improvements, etc.) 1, PROJECT COST LATECOMER J..ATECOMER AGREEMENT - WATER NO PER. FTG. FEE 1. E CITY HELD —0 -- 1 PRIVATE DEVELOPER HELD - Q - LATECOMERS AGREEMENT - SEWER CITY HELD -0 - , PRIVATE DEVELOPER HELD .- A SPECIAL UTILITY CONNECTION CHARGE - WATER UNITS SUCC FEE , ' Single family residential dwelling unit $300/lot x Apartment, Condo, each multiplex unit $175/ea. unit x Commercial/Industrial $.4/sq. ft. of property x A e faol6 '7ô', FBI 9�,� A/Z!o SPECIAL UTILITY CONNECTION CHARGE - SEWER Single family residential dwelling unit $300/lot x Apartment, condo, each multiplex unit $175/ea, unit x Commercial/Industrial $, 4/sq. t. of property x hifigeo0 R ;��7_ lir* SPECIAL ASSESSMENT D STRICT (Hospital Area) WATER UNITS SAD FEE DEVELOPMENTS WITH 15 GPME FLOWS OR LESS: Area Charge $0. 4 p f sq.ft. x f Frontage Charge i /00 per front ft. .x DEVELOPMENTS WITH GREA , THAN 1500 GPM FIRE FLOWS; Area Charge $0 48 er sq.ft. x I Frontage Char a $18. 0 per front ft. x -- Q- SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT (Honey Crk. Intercptr) - SEWER UNITS SAD FEE AREA CHARGES: Residential d lling its. apartments I or equivalen ; $2 0 per dwelling unit x I, Commercial develop nt: I $.05 per sq.ft. , gross site area x FRONT FOOTAGE CHARGE $37.19 per Frptt F ► (on ea. side) x . I $74.38 per fr.ft. (p 'tv .on both sides of imprv.) x - o - TOTAL: $ // AZB'2. 4- The above quoted fees do NOT include inspection fees, side sewer permits, r/w permit fees or the cost of water meters. „M � 9-•/g'eft ,� . r.,14.,1, lid , _ . . ► DATE 9 /Y /?0 a Signature of Director or Authorized Re tative ! ` 19 P�i AA/ • RENTON PLANNING DIVISION .:. RENTON FIRE DEPT. • ; FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU . • DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET •i 'I. 1990 RECEIVED ECF-078-90 "` '. APPLICATION NO(S).: CU;SA;V-078-90 1 PROPONENT: • • •- I Renton Village Associates • • PROJECT TITLE: Village Place North 1 BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: ° • • • Applicant proposes to construct •a new 10-story office/retail building requiring a Conditional Use Permit since building will exceed 95' In height. The • proposal also includes renovation of existing retail center and existing drives,demolition of a portion of the existing retail, renovation of landscaping and lighting. A variance will also be needed to construct a new. private street. LOCATION: • Renton Village Center, S Grady Way . TO: ., PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT • SCHEDULED ERC DATE: . • ENGINEERING DIVISION • TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION H . SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: V, UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION • V' FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU• • • ' POLICE DEPARTMENT . ;,'. • • - COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT . BUILDING DIVISION •; PLANNING DIVISION• l• • PLANNING DIVISIONCITY OF RENTON • • CURRENT PLANNING JUL "�90 LONG RANGE PLANNING , • 11 iCILALI ,N i„y PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT • i . OTHERS: • COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. . PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO.THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5:00 P.M. ON AUGUST 2, 1990. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: lore- P VellA-hd.; OEC B 4 C UJ A y APPROVED • •• • APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED Any development and/or construction shall comply with current Fire and Building Codes and Ordi- nances. /9gST Came)/ i4'"O . EE C0A/sr-RC C7 v i 0 11/4A .RAsE ,et -mov A second means of approved access is required. Fire De artment access ro d/lanes shall be paved minimum width 20'; .minimum height 13' 6". Yes o Preliminary fire flow calculations.showla grants with a minimum flow of e flow of /�o gpm each is required. • � y is required. , Primary hydrant is required to:be within iso feet of the structure. Secondary hydrants are required to be within Sod feet of the structure. An approved automatic sprinkler system is required to protect the total structure. Yes No All fire department access roads are to be paved and installed prior to construction. Yes No_ Ail fire hydrants are required to be installed and approved prior to construction. Yes T o • 114-e--)44:--L y/4,,;, DATE: /zi/9P,) • SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE . REV. 5/90 ,1 112A. /i(/F 4 /9 2 ) 4 ¶ U (u n/ Any dev,elopment and/or construction shall comply with current Fire and Building Codes and Ordi- nances. A second means of approved access is required. Fire epartment access roads/lanes shall be paved minimum width 20'; minimum height 13' 6". Yes No Preliminary fire flow calculations show a fire flow of 3i 75d is required. hydrants with a minimum flow of /, o•ao gpm each is required. Primary!hydrant is required to be within 4S0 feet of the structure. Secondary hydrants are required to be within .3 Qo feet of the structure. An approved automatic sprinkler system is required to protect the total structure. Yes No T All fire department access roads are to be paved and installed prior to construction. Yes No All fire hydrants are required to be installed and approved prior to construction. Yes.._..... No ,VLA-41 z.) ,,?0 Jq ‘. i cF,//i7/4/we/ U N.4/ I REQUIRED FIRE FLOW CALCULATIONS HAZARD IDENTIFICATION INFORMATION NAME: //,i 4.4' %� ce AJ U.B.C. CLASS OF BUILD ADDRESS: /2ir,vrad 11i,(/.9.4t C.ev7"ff FIRE MGMT AREA DETER NE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION - CLASS (CIRCLE ONE) :(I _ II ) IV III V RE-RESISTIVE NON-COMBUSTIBLE ORDINARY WOOD FRAME MIXED TOTE: IF "MIXED," SEE SPECIAL INSTRUCTION FOR AREA AND BASIC FIRE FLOW) DETERMINE AREA: 'O ���� o c�/� GROUND FLOOR AREA: FT2 //��p NUMBER OF STORIES 1 i /7/ 1 TOTAL BUILDING AREA: Q 311,239 -(A) DETERMINE BASIC FIRE FLOW FROM TABLE #1, USING AREA (A): 34p0 GPM (B) DETERMINE OCCUPANCY FACTOR ADJUSTMENT: ADJUSTMENT: - 7Sb GPM (C) IF LOW HAZARD, SUBTRACT UP TO 25% OF (B): IF HIGH HAZARD, ADD UP TO 25% of (B) COMPUTE SUB-TOTAL (B+C) : (IF B+C LESS THAN 500 GPM, INSERT 500 GPM) .Zj7-SD GPM (D) DETERMINE SPRINKLER ADJUSTMENT: ADJUSTMENT: — ;16e . ;,fit -. GPM (E) (IF COMPLETELY SPRINKLERED, SUBTRACT UP TO 50% OF (D): IF LIGHT HAZARD OCCUPANCY AND FIRE RESISTIVE OR NON-COMBUSTIBLE CONSTRUCTION, SUBTRACT UP TO 75% OF (D) . , DETERMINE EXPOSURE ADJUSTMENT: USING THE TABLE AS A GUIDE, ENTER THE SEPARATION AND ADJUSTMENT FOR EACH OF THE "FOUR FACES" OF THE BUILDING IN THE TABLE AT THE RIGHT: SEPARATION MAX. ADJUSTMENT EXPOSURE SEPARATION ACT. ADJ. 0-10 25% MAX NORTH /SO -t-- ADD 0 % 11 - 30 20% MAX EAST / 50'-f- ADD - % 31 - 60 15% MAX SOUTH /SO'f— ADD -e- % 61 - 100 10% MAX WEST 70' ADD /,Q % 101 - 150 5% MAX TOTAL % OF ADJUSTMENT 150 or 4-Hr WALL 0% MAX (NOT TO EXCEED 75%) /0 % (TOTAL % ADJUSTMENT TIMES (D) ADJUSTMENT: -}-- zZg .'GPM(F) DETERMINE ROOF AND SIDING COVERING ADJUSTMENT: (IF SHINGLE COVERING, ADD 500 GPM) ADJUSTMENT: GPM (G) J. COMPUTE ESTIMATED FIRE FLOW REQUIRED: [F D+E+F+G IS LESS THAN 500 GPM, INSERT 500 GPM) !.5'5 727 IF D+E+F+G IS GREATER THAN 12,000 GPM, INSERT 12,000 GPM) (D+E+F+G) REQUIRED FIRE FLOW: 4,5"00 GPM (H) 1. SIGNED: /4/44e.- .17, DATE: 1, 6 J l?-1 /990 1• 4 V REQUIRED FIRE FLOW CALCULATIONS HAZARD IDENTIFICATION INFORMATION • NAME: V//X/114( • P//?c2 . /J U.B.C. CLASS OF BUILD ADDRESS: �/��vroA/ /.((A6F 6'eA/7 ? FIRE MGMT AREA DETERMINE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION - CLASS (CIRCLE ONE): - II IV III V • [RE-R f9 E NON-COMBUSTIBLE ORDINARY, • WOOD FRAME • MIXED VOTE: IF "MIXED," SEE SPECIAL INSTRUCTION FOR AREA AND BASIC FIRE FLOW) 1 ▪ DETERMINE AREA: /�j�cfr" , LyA`/__E GROUND FLOOR AREA: FT2 • NUMBER OF 'STORIES i i TOTAL BUILDING AREA: -/,5`7, Z.55-•• (A) • DETERIMINE BASIC FIRE FLOW FROM TABLE #1, USING AREA (A): h)O0O GPM (B) • DETERMINE OCCUPANCY FACTOR ADJUSTMENT: ADJUSTMENT: '8—' GPM (C) IF LOW HAZARD, SUBTRACT UP TO 25% OF (B) : IF HIGH HAZARD, ADD UP TO 25% ,'of (B) I' • COMPUITE SUB-TOTAL (B+C): • ��d00 GPM (D) (IF Bi C LESS THAN 500 GPM,. INSERT 500 GPM) • DETERMINE• SPRINKLER ADJUSTMENT: ADJUSTMENT: - 3/ c-a-a GPM (E) (IF COMPLETELY SPRINKLERED, SUBTRACT . UP TO 50% OF (D): IF LIGHT HAZARD OCCUPANCY • AND FIRE RESISTIVE OR NON-COMBUSTIBLE CONSTRUCTION, SUBTRACT UP TO 75% OF (D). ▪ DETERMINE EXPOSURE ADJUSTMENT: I.' USING; THE TABLE AS A GUIDE, ENTER THE SEPARATION AND ADJUSTMENT FOR EACH OF THE 'FOUR FACES" OF THE BUILDING IN THE TABLE AT THE RIGHT: ", SEPARATION MAX. ADJUSTMENT EXPOSURE SEPARATION ACT. ADJ. j0-10 • • 25% MAX NORTH / 50 -f— ADD - % 11 - 30 20% MAX EAST •070I ADD /O % . 3'1 - 60 15% MAX SOUTH /Sc)' -' 'ADD -, - % Gil - 100 10% MAX WEST /SO'-t-- ADD -$- % O1 - 150 • 5% MAX TOTAL % OF ADJUSTMENT .1 150 or 4-Hr WALL 0% MAX (NOT TO EXCEED 75%) /did % II` GPM(F) (TOTAL % ADJUSTMENT TIMES (D) ADJUSTMENT: -I-- tiara 1. DETE MINE ROOF AND SIDING COVERING ADJUSTMENT: _ GPM (G) • (IF ,_HINGLE COVERING,, ADD 500 GPM) ADJUSTMENT: 10. COM •UTE ESTIMATED FIRE FLOW REQUIRED: ; (IF D+E+F+G IS LESS THAN 500 GPM, INSERT 500 GPM) • (IF D+E+F+G IS GREATER THAN 12,000 GPM, INSERT 12,000 GPM) 3, 0O0 (D+E+F+G) REQUIRED FIRE FLOW: 3, 7 50 • GPM (H) 11. SIGNED: /Aiere.- 4,7-`_ DATE: ftJLf / ,/77d I • • • �, • • • •`•1 . '11:.4 _ �... %'. ••a' t ;' .V g CURRENT PLANNING b. LONG :.JGE PLANNING PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT , , OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5:00 P.M. ON AUGUST 2, 1990. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: 'POI tne_, • APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED jbPcttatkjLfvluui'cô • tf J DATE: N616 SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE , 5 REV.5/90 DATE: August 2, 1990 %a • k TO: Planning Division FROM: Penny Bryant, Police Department SUBJECT: VILLAGE PLACE NORTH • The police department has several recommendation for the Village Place North project. Most of the concerns surround the construction of the parking structure. Parking garages arc known for the lack of security they provide and the increase in vulnerability that they cause for the users of such structures. Such facilities are typically dark, making it difficult to see,floors are on a grade,further obstructing sight.There often is no method of summing aid. Some recommendations for improving the safely at Village Place North are asfollows: 1. In the parking structure, the stairwells are located on exterior walls of the buildings. They are shown in tiled towers. The tiling is fine, but the towers should also have glazing material from the ground to the roof. This glazing allows visibility c)f the occupants from outside the structure. 2. In the parking structure,the stairwells should be equipped with emergency notification systems,call boxes or phones for emergency response. 3. The parking structure should have a minimum eight foot clearance throughout the garage. 4. The structure should have designated walking paths that are illuminated. 5. In the parking structure,the stairwells should be clearly marked and the direction in which to travel to reach them,also clearly identified. 6. The parking structure should have lighting in the stairwells at all times. 7. Any retail businesses located in the office structure should not have reflective glass. Tinted is acceptable. OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5:00 P.M.ON AUGUST 2, 1990. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: 'o»5poy SyS/cyis• APPROVED ••..; . • • . • APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED • • DATE: , SIGNATURE 0 DIRECTOR OR A ORIZED REPRESENTATIVE y � i f•`" '() ,Q %. REV.5/90 Village Place North Office/Retail Project Renton Village Center • August 1, 1990 Subject: Site Review Comments 1. Sidewalks to be provided on Grady Way abutting property frontage. 2. Intersection of S. Grady Way and Lake Avenue S. provide traffic improvement to • south leg of intersection as proposed in Traffic Study. Widenrightlane Sou.th leg to allow two exclusive northbound left-turn lanes and a through • Intersection design to meet City Standards. 3. As indicated in the Traffic Study, a Transportation Management plan to be developed for the new office/retail project. I; i, 4. This project, plus the potential for future projects, will have serious consequences for the Transportation system. A Transportation plan is to be i• developed for the Renton Village area. Also, a proposal is to be prepared from the findings to be incorporated into the Grady Way TBZ, which subsequently may be modified. This plan should be completed prior to issuance of site plan approval. 5. Transportation mitigation fees will be determined and applied after the findings in item 4 above. 6. The intersection of South Grady Way/Benson Rd./at Main Avenue S. to be included in the proposed plan developed in item 4 above. • I CEM880/CEM/mr I , }. I'LANIJIN(i UIVI IUfv ggl2CITY OF lil_NTON JUL 1 2 19,9n • RENTON PLANNING DIVISION SIT 'l 1J9O CITY OF REIV IQ WELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET RECEIVED PUBLIC WORKS , CUSTOMER SERVICES,:, , • ECF-078-90 APPLICATION NO(S).: CU;SA;V-078-90 PROPONENT: _ Renton Village Associates ' PROJECT TITLE: • Village Place North BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT::. • . Applicant proposes to construct a new 10-story office/retail building requiring a Conditional Use Permit since building will exceed 95' In height. The proposal also includes renovation of existing retail center and existing drives,demolition of a portion of the existing retail, renovation of landscaping and lighting: A variance will also be needed to construct a new private street. LOCATION: 0 Renton Village Center, S Grady Way TO: ` PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED.EPIC DATE: • ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: • • UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU,, : ,, POLICE DEPARTMENT .1 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT • BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION CURRENT PLANNING , ,. LONG RANGE PLANNING PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT " • �THERS: fd ^'� . 1/� COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5:00 P.M. ON AUGUST 2, 1990. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: VTu.,r7r /0L4 N R IF_!//fi APPROVED . APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS (/NOT APPROVED j The drainage plans for this proposal"shall comply with the core.and special requirements contained in Section 1.2 and 1.3 of Chapter I, the hydrologic analysis methods contained in Chapter 3, the hydraulic analysis and design methods contained in Chapter 4, and the erosion/sedimentation control plan and practices contained in Chapter 5 of the 1990 King County Surface Water Design Manual. , �;/f /Oe �e moire 8- 3d "QXis!!# 91610-r /ice Z. Dow:15iv'(' r,. Diu/ys/s U . y / /64 3. S lire I S ih f?�1-? "/OG -j/gcvr f'/�do(�j/�t�/J <f 4 �e5/y��cl fC•�T �'1 - /oo,y-Pcf Wq et iel/eJ j5 .F_Gm�, ay, FF E LFv .44/61m-1oe1 a5 o,� I , 'i. ANAL.Y2p 4NO N1i17G47'e MIA4-cl3 70 1M ' /00- Y/e, FCOa/J1oG IN flits f1 t5 . f( w4476.P, slo/�46.r, uoGu-47e' /5 /i'!_tiJ"i D Ci4'o FL00OAd4/N) Co//V N14TOPR, 7T'G4'yGE A>05r / �4tUD/mod z1 5: F P"tl-j/Y6- /k " 6 5E coN/Ve-P or 5/TE Gl>/c,L AP*Givive MG ' MIN. ! o:G-KA D a T a C 13 r N Pit-WV/VG-l/V G- L075. �- C'r¢T<h� /3�¢$//Y5. C, L NI r'IEIQMR0 mire A 1 4 hitci4Y5 "+N Der aty Rani /olMh-S 51.141..1. 63E PLACED HI Wpm. SIGNAT�R �F JCTOR OR REPRESENTATIVE a, DATE: 1 ^/4 -Ye*/ ARE4S• C-7 Aue Yo hisfiVy of �'(aodri " oh PIr5 s1t`f,It ibov inist0 be botieflcra f ju Co'ictvc rI q preJes9 tvrtee fifer " I G 3 REVS/90 b{ftueeo Cif-r App lr uwt- 10 gadve� `'p row e.o.m. ... . . - r i uuuL, vvUl1I UtrMH I MEN I SCHEDULED ERC DATE: ' ENGINEERING DIVISION , TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: - UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU;.:; . ' POLICE DEPARTMENT:,_, •' .. r. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT . BUILDING DIVISION ' • • PLANNING DIVISION;.. ;. CURRENT PLANNING ' I i ; / • LONG RANGE PLANNING , 1 PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT . OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5:00 P.M. ON AUGUST 2, 1990.;1' , r .k REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: �SccV'`ea.410 , APPROVED •_,•••• /APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED • - C e J v2oP Gj�49vc.iJ / { vie P.V-T1 C-!Pd-7 ,,ni Iii DI 1 %6K/4-C /fl( o v yvi ,V 73 ii-( 7/ 0a 71• . *re: iyo--- Y .gO:v e /S (r�r 6 L a vt5 I I, I i' it • I; DATE: r d . S GNATURE OF DIRECTOR R AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE . I! • • REV.5/90• !' REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: i�e,� u4,I1 -G', APPROVED •. - . ... APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS - //NOT APPROVED )94 Z. PRRAU''/NG5 hf4 LL. •:kgr ZZ'X 3 Y/15C�¢Gr /'' 20' po,q C, .,. U T(c/7Y /0L4-lY s. (i 2. Apec•Ic•4rF mulT o1074/iV I;,f &1W •/yr 1Pe_-f 4-4FS I OI w47. L INKS 4 S(�F..AZ L//vFs •• /At r4SFrG/F/YTS w/Y/C4y jQit/5 :7o f F_ A•13.6ZN,1Do7/ ./9-N,D/crA 4I icli'f'.1), . • ti• • 3, Gou- oft_ 5rt'/ .., '.741kffr 0416-/tfor//q /1-N sole_ 4/5..ei5.- /h'Tiory • MvSr- t3 E c6/vt loc;Pr?r_o . • y, ALE_ COP b. • L'F_r/F_L,5 IN /9/4/4!1/NF 0-4`14 - 11- /46 /3 1)(f/l/N ;. To 74 N(p9-m( V.S/�- L , IN 'Pei cC. o/c./rv7-7.. 5 -f0 P/4-ToR ;cu/r/y 9 YN4 55 5/ 2E L T-0 /fn N wGE G 4-140-6-6 I'/mP�/--G au, • S. 50e. SF g ;:.M�Sr^. lh4vF_ M(N(Munl a5o S 4G/061(/ 4 74of _ .i,.iQ,67,,,.0 DATE: �S"/a �' / -' t SIB ARP/Waded F D ECTC�, 3 AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE • .1 REV.5/90 Ik...1.duLLIJ \I L. ENGINEERI DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION ; SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: • UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION , FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU. .. . ,' • POLICE DEPARTMENT *. • COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION .• , . . • PLANNING DIVISION CURRENT PLANNING • VLONG RANGE PLANNING • PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT • OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5:00 P.M. ON AUGUST 2, 1990. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: elaaAnirU-ft APPROVED . •• APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED •• Sur ' I OTEQ6 qual-20,) e0FS. svp3(.= co,Er LctrA_Dittsvprc.i Ave__ • "OMR_ • . - . 4Th I12 ueit LAO — ••• ii)liAT I S (,0---1 ('elm I r: PPlizotig. 131-7 Fa , • • DATE: . t7F8 SIGNATUFFOF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE , • REV.5/90 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: I'*• I-1)6 • APPROVED • APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED • . , • . • e * i As /- a 'Lei- 1PO'kie esetivw, • . . • 4 ' • C • • • DATE: SIGNATURE I ETOR OR AUTHORIZ REPRESENTATIVE S •. • REV. 5/90 • l MIO.y. 1fNC4 P . . . + • h.GKAIN WAy • / ,..•TYPICAL . o/wsce �y ' • :r' -- _ (1._ _ . __ ....,_____ . _ "N \ ill J / i . . • /- • 1 (------------ �Uub r -J. - ' --71...--'4----77 • �/ ` S • �� I EXI57NG / F �i7/ / • i FEMA 29.0 D / / / R / u,, PARKING / I ? u / // j i' `/ --- - 1¢V GARAGE / 7 - / i !' /; ! ! la UNDERGROUND ►��.:' •• / %OFFICE/RETAIL i c, % �-- _ / FLOOD COMPENSATING STORAGE r / i ! \. I / f - - 0( ' g .1 10•01,\`; lFa) 1-'� � / TOWER /u9 L -� / RETAIL / ,1 I• .:o-o •w»e —��''/• -.' !EXISTNG 9 I ,//¢`< •, .�`/ % ,1 - - .- - - RMeffid saa' ., ' 7• • / _ IFEMA 29.0\ I / // ,// _ r• _ _ - __ 'V' tialow) Now o...v rws errs / ` I / /;`' - ��:.''-`_ - -- ....... --"'�`>%T'- a°"" O _ ` • \� et. tsy y / ..� ! I 1 RETAIL Li' ;., _ _ - _. 'C�ttiin •'III• GARAGE FLOOR FCS T06' ••**�����cS I' �: 1•, ti I ~- ! - 6. •Y�•O +Y�.> c• _ ICI. . • ) .. .......+ n 0 ix••� mow`• o • t� _ jam'- �O/WSR ,i ii/�• / ••••....... ! "-�+ {� ." - - it mwm ^'• n'�.`xlri'' - aar" i ��a \ p))'`/./ 1 f 1::` • r C ,��,' lI f7 - Y • .. - _ _ - ._ 4 • 1.411.. G FE EFLOW IC 't .l !/ '`� • ' rj ____ . ONDEfi6(aVF7[1 hlOD WI}I6 5XX4�6(ryh) \BYPASS a(' /' '�.: r ,.) - Pf: 1 . .,_ 7 . , / . • , ..: r-:.\.* . . ---- ' . - -\\'?,-;,„.. ..,;\\ .- / ----------1..r)-1 . _____. _ ---•=•_-, . -- • • • - - . �` / i i (uoxa I paw (� • '....!'";.:'..'......)!:'"4:::."kl.;:"..',';',11..?:`, --*--::'''.:...-1-,-,:r...;..1::::',.4-%:*:,:.7-.::`.;•:;`:-:.;--;••,:,:-:%::ii-C',',"',...7-'7..4..-",5:L.'-.•:•;'-''''''.: C ''•.: • 11ti�.:.• A FEMA 24.0 151.241‘'� ' ! Q - -•ovni r-' 70EXIST 0/W �>.✓'r+✓ /" _ �. .\��®.�I . � U i/:It nI 1 -- �, �/ �5'��j -'t t�t/ant • U 0# .. ' ,a WATER '_` ,R „ •(`FIX EROSION I� .- - ti.:. '�`�" _ y' - •. _ -- t> N' I, _ -_- /^ c>Y�V Vl(1q J IIII7777 ,i/ / ,,r ~ �i i \COMPENSATING STORAGE CONCEPTS .3%,/ •.•r Tell CONCEPTUAL • . P \�`�: - t/ ,:;- ` L - '-151,900 CF EXISTNG 100 YR FLOOD PLAN VOLUME STORM . Tsl- • - _ 69,600__ FUTURE 100 YR FLOOD PLAN VOI.IME DRAINAGE ` \�rf' FOf EROSION --__• - ,• 87.100 CF CONPENSATNG STORAGE(FCS)REOUREO & • • FLOOD , �� u __--__ `• -. — -- _- NEW 7Y - HAKy-'21ero-1.41 �' W. I �MOR aurNEL� — - _ __=-- _— _ —Tsi =GARAGEFLOOR MANHOLES -- / 40'i — . ` — �� / _--^--1 -- _ L 55,900 CF UMERGROUN3 FCS ... ` • oe eoa- . • �\�_`` �`�% 93,900 CF 1069E OF REOUREAFNT • c `'\\„ �J=� 1 irTI LAIW AWE.7. ,4iAfra-Ala — g r` . _ ;'rye h.6fADy WAY 8 77--- J I ` A r / �• lbDoFer urN • l � 1 _ •4 . • r-to ti `J �1 _ .7,, :...\n ' i �I r� ` I " WPED4ae4 NamO/O c uenMb ° A. _ 'l �- 'AOvrB Lar,•mx 6r,'y o' fa ou, i3 fj, / 1 ! ^ -1 tor uno•rb.MK 6lO rS ` • . for 1 ` r r . g . / 4 / PAR 1 G t\ rb X i 1 /� .....0. GARAGE / J ,1/ • % -- , / '� ✓ wcotb N »Mv ?•�- _ /'j II L ./' ! l r •j r' /A-i� Da.n / w{w� µc N 'a rlmc i;I)/ n/.��"iDwa Lk p�uo JC//'/�'e !1!(:�`.�Y :'U° Ilrg °rat`' w ia� r 1 / 4WD �+e^'�)' '/ \`\. _ rj i' i •%, `; us e" VA f+� ,3yb°' OFFICE!RETAIL i b / 1 0 TOWER jI / / a ( �/ `. �R �'1 r ; rr••us a'�'o rcw RETAIL sbr / KanmD NM mP w / h•p.o I N.44.6 j ri / - - , _ w noo v.,o a..%oL�� +4 a F j • °.1,0 11. K r, ' l iI - •• yfeL •V SI O.raw '•�`x• •/ //I,•'j -t F,: '==-ti_ r i _ _• • - ' /otoic w• ?Crnw n•1 `l µW MVO •r - Y • u !'h SYYB GIbOSN Mb , lL.an K�N �96:tYr¢ M6 ;_ •% - - - - tr. �/r RETAIL �� Y N•/h6 / • c • \ .e #Ii6/fK/w :6M1ri fD l j «y `61- / .. -1 \l ' \VtWYO a t�,l '/ `c .. _ / L Kpo fs r .',.... .....'..,:',I. : .. ., . • 11 .: --�- , LAW , �� Y tGA 4- �_ 7. nN i. `\� `,'�, - ° -- if ni•frcxer- �t d .°.,- .....1«i I/ r 11 / �, aI 'j , •,vzzu uum. ` R. - • 6'WA1LZ -_�• \ Hm ue>r eCDN ti_ —` ,:orneCl� ! •0.� �1 L• / �, �r ,• Ker wa, R u�vat,• nn tt,• fy a-� __`` •'S�. -- /.. 1-'- ,r �S� „ " bPO.ND hrR AiPI•MAi It 1'1 - - . ��\• °ry/LcD�+rF+]2-for E \ '/Wpf°bm0,9 hoop • - - �_- 11'"l1l . \ •^1 ema°m f e sevntk Are1.6 �i I e a j.,voD =� r `l .0 a - •• - h ' i I ...�• —................... bd ,rbn,rn • �\--,...„, .0 ux Ste, - e��' • sinµre aU. / eca _ • -- ,'• .--,•— -.'r "-'. < . _ 4'4';-5:•f,' :--/ ft . aa�-0e _ S t _ _ • �� �_'_ I P(AINA66 Emig eeomv aZ. ww m ~� j - _-- - 14 Jr) n�ty SSA N! !way 1 .-- _ \ . FA° ° . I-A 4D�i 1 `_ -- l K„w+' , ,{ • ti _ - - L. Joe*9008 ' • W°G•ADubmM WOOD. - - _ ,r. \�`` `_- ` ` C�� ram_ • .--- ,.----- .--- htlAff0a( i .s., VILLAGE ,... _- :::_i------ . Nonni- timo rAN:ASDIGL-6 _ ....„.. \ , L , • .-E LJ . ...., El 's: ••'"--. ' -', .. , RENTON.WASHNGTON 0 , ----- ., RES7ON VILLAGE ASSOCIATES . ...•--- . ,..- - ,.•-• '\SW..\11. .\.,,,......i...,\.,. _ .....,,:: _ .....•. - C-.1 . :‘-\\ .,,,,,; .. __‘_ _\_ / I ; ...•., ----...-1-..--. . ..----- .1.• Callison vrAIND titimnsui / _- .• .. -t• . <••• •.- - - .• . • -"1::-.-- 6 MCI ofig. , • : , ,_.._ ,,) .. ..,,‘,,, , .-7.1 .• i:fg .' -- ; i• ,....' ,._:.•-' .-.,1...,,/- --1_ • ''.'% -....r., i 1 \ ,.""•-' yr •- % •' .'-;- '':-• '-'.. . \ k...?.„_..,... ' ' 6altAsKy arrai ------ ''''' ':' :::!-- . . •••• ‘:--•-:-.T7. ..-. .7 . r.Acc . . . ..--:.----;A"' ------- •,'• - •—•-• ..., • ' — ,,,--,-,• s- . . . , • , . • • —. : • : '• P-\.\%\k\\‘'.• : \. ,_•.- ,s.\, „ \ \ \,, . • ifligAy „. 1..t•We 1. : s. 10 ' . 1_ . i • • 7:7.1r.zr.... 1.*:• , •.• •-,........—. .. • ' '- //////,/#///://// -) ..:.:---- . --fC---(:), -- '.4,`.7.,;,..t." //////1/7///1. •//L ... i __. •'\.-flt,.. ([ r '' 3•Vris•c"..‘""' : /••• ..-./ • ' • ( S': . : 4, 0 _ ..:. ,....t,.s,.....„ -,...-,,, - ,i- _..,....,,=1.,.. ...... - , S\.\\\\N\\\\\' ‘,! _., • • , . : •': ----—1",'..-1r-'-... ,. _ • __. , • ., ' .1,' ,Ii, 1.] ..) .E ,,>,,,///,;6///, • . i , ,,'.1 •1 / / /' I/L . 1 \'''':: . . - - . • ...• - . .__ ..,,?„, -r , i -...r-- , - .,... Sg-",...-•:, ... . .• - • --1 \• ,..7 7, :;:,")E.- I ,..c',.. •.......2 sis,y'ti !,,N•To . _________ 1.- \„....:__,,c c c i c:. c gl',/:..s//// //.. •••/// . . .. . • --------- . ' •‘.. ,.,-,-L ' , :..,L,.....,:- . • l'.4.: I \„... ' -I L... v,i,/„ ://///,/...• ,i/L ,______ . tP •... . •1 , *.V. 41 '' (-\5 ..\\\%\•:\‘.\\\\\•:\S-' \.\ \X\\'''. .\\Ss •. . . ._.---- . -7•..J u 1.1.ii, -7-'--- . L. ..., . . ."--, •---, .:.? 7, ,...--- . . ....• „ • , . . -, •.....„—=_=.— c',/ --•--:\s• \--'-. 6 N, . • .k%..„. f• 1.',,!,•,\-••''\ ;, Ws-f . ( , \ . ......___. -- ,-,.."\\,... '<,....,,,•.'e ,.... .-j _, V 1 I".____Ej . '..... . 0--- -3;' . • .. =V-- ....Z......-- - ._• ..._ ' '•--',--L;'-';'t ... •.. ----.--.- 4.`;et....:4-`'.7 e ...7.1.Y-!4.4,..., 4.s...-...,,.... .. ..--",.0,s.as op...a. v.......,5...-% .•ro.... ' .... " .: LEGENQ___ .., _____ — . .. ' I. -.. . . ...,,,,,,,.. . J • . . . __ _ __ - r•„ _ ,.——I/i-r4 Me•adr."WE , 1 ._., . ' ___—,.6,4s•-..ce ,,,....4.,6 -:74.,......"7:544,-- _____ __ _ ___ ____ ...., .___ .... • . gugf Zell -, —____----•- •....,,, _ ._ . \ :„..,., .,,,,,........,„,,./r.c•AT ...moo imm•• •. ,161CA4J UM -1A -„ _ i . ______ • . Z-64".,'',..„-,`,.-7,,,!.....-:‘,..--'- • VILLAGE - f:_ , - PLACE wilt- MOW?ANC AND KIC6 %= , 1 NORTH 0 - /'': - - - xav w/N• ty/25=t I,L- o ' e' - ,� REN ON.WASHINGTON _ lAXS AV6.h. :1 —, "Y j „A \ -� ...,tx:�,�,GE, ,,,ts : = UnisonhD/i �615A1 - �I anyWAy -.N\`j _ f��� /PJ-44JN ,./3,-,wtx..o- �� / - --- - i -- , ice- _ __ eJriIEJ./ _ • - _ -------.\-- _ `�j I -/, • I/ 'e) ? .+t,"•',u tee. N,'e1 •i'.'I '�'+''-^�=71T ` .�\`?t� THNP(WAy r Ab7E*r: �.+,+ • - - _ �� J J ` v? ; ,,cam p ?i+�'``€ti '/ fr��s/ a•4E.YoEX/5Ve �N4 /<. ,�,,,.,,. _ . •'� I I _ k. ni'4.9' rAy- - _ -- is L.X E.AP E by/T/N -s,Ve /_Y '- 4 z - �------� i�.� 8/ .•,33` 'A� ,:�'sL^ .�.r ;" ,�, W :' .�!y xr. •d;,ii n /x .'/ ./ ��/� a+�CT..rt .� !lEIAIL dE.T.E1:7V RiY'N 3�✓E . - _ _ - -- I' _ < i-zy, � ice,F ,sn1.�. amv3 Gv > '. a4r1 wEo°E t rw/oE sue. _ - +£t4e .. _ -.:� I :c Y;.. .i"»:",=:' "'' •Teas AN,Aas. :t'•^ss4` a.:eE.rcve-ez snN4 /-soar .. -• . - _ . /� 1 t• '••t'i....i'. a' pax �,S„ w=a>^••a�g.l_ - • t e iz�:{.,"�* .�..t�%'�" aeTmt spun/of s1aYNs4✓E. Mira'. / I r'2�+r s .t:* ms+ I re..,``••',r:,ji,. :,c.4�: _� , \\\ 2t�s \ L� = e R.eHO E RET.f/� Fi:uoc. _ lAf�ul vn i I'1 :^r „ i' srt' - _J .''s;-e •.,a '.t•. !1 ._ — r —� - rzFin,,,z . xE _ _ • I 1 i. ,,!• ••3a''s "�' �"C. ii - y.-;' dad_ ^ri �`Y/ • • ^z �,^.-;' 4- P.• ;5. ,-: AER/Ab.sbsergaAoh• f<atnn.Y4 _ri> 'I 5 I !{ I ,..�.A'Eh:QW!YC?5f / '( '/( �,^>5'.„,,`,.�.�,: c.:Nprn,N5 Fe._ Fia1NeY .. • - .. zt..',.*,,.-:.-om-tr-42.-;:Al.k.tr',,,Tr.,7.-. •-•- -3 ••,.. , . _ . . • . IF I' p, -!�--�s•�- '_ .awJ�1 �; -+ ,. �•ev nros 7.2.11y ax/ss4 sNEwo...e - _ - __ t- -.t' !p �'". E :e..” �, -� is t/fi�./N w//N 643/fCb!/NE. ''4 '.s4Y A}_': • c__) l °� O c'�}a, ";,,i>•" I` - �" ..ae\ I v 4. O.tRXfNy Nof.K7eN: -- _ - > 'kf;`x' I�- _• •�.U v I r 'd"� 5•6TANM4o MGE Jets I -, x N I _I I Y 1 C=.Fnaner 3weE a , r _ - PAY N�AAW i i v�'s-` __ __ •• =F'-' +: 544cE3 KE7./J/N aESC'vs io2 • - I`. - a•a^-� .Y "e. 2k' 1LS;' /2-O/.JAIL nG9FFt H?IcrATaV S/.WN OAWCP. - . •,,` I�.__-. �L�yt,/l S.�wavN4 .eab.I.xm�v75. ° `.'r.. 3"�•' �' ,a,. -` -i a vfvz-4.a6 JLf V -�j F _ ...Cr-Free z�N4 Scca�a - - tl �•.-*t.. G• gA.1Ad a74,,w-:-_sa � -7 ..AvoSr<os( y, sco es ._arR _;°t-' 'i.�,"•:.;,<L:y" �' '.. \, ` ,,� Cale#:�F41A.' HOO SP. -- _ . = :,,' '`c _ .;. .,,ta I 6.4era/r. PA<x.�4 -- ice:' :•,..". - .---- a::.:5...-.N-•::,._:-r� .:'....�, :rs;-+' Y•`,.''t'x:t 'QJ i5 lr �l �.s I ii Mace 4SF: 4 s$R.'M- -- L. \ '':;•€0`0:�.-5a.RZre= U.6)1Pf c- lft VJaa.e :zs I fscws rrx�NeriE.wex.E ? �f- eo-sn.s.' tem so. o ' I — + r�' - . fit/ ----, ; 5E5 avr,a+:s r�.A�vN y a�eea — �/ i ---.-• 2? ''•. y= '''• iy' rr,, µ*e RRom- it / / - G /� �, \ �,` , ,:y 1 ,s+' '-'�'J( /;. Jlq` -Z e. w+.vorer/nm areB,sieJe�ry �ocsoN/uamFri-- • - . �+,,.:..-4_. � vv (J ronv+-uraa-nbe /% `O� � ,e.-?,, x; � 7 h x I,.z. za,o oFF,.. A.E . ( 1 =sv�::,[;l 'u,Nsf I, In x 466. 9 ea/CTa/� "--Est. - - .- M's'- ae:J �7.a'illNs rc m' REa✓ies/reav[5 .,57 - /--\ v -J k x: a JaSG/NCp 3\�',ll�• 6Q.-smN:'- c.nrEi u,s' • - ..‘.,::::\ ..`� ar s o. -5._2 -` P. -PLACE. _ \ \\II ,, � - -- -- cNTOt�I VILt .< —T-. . • f, - SITE PLAN -- - - PLAN -_ • s, _ G. J r--- � - ONF icrAroN atkch �� , I G(,+4 .J Oft?-V I -- ATTACHMENT#7 A 1 - VILLAGE 1-6I5 0 1 0Pd SP-0• SP-0' t RPd 1 RPd t 30-0' t aP-P SP-P' I 15'd T-■. PLACE i I I I I `. ! NORTH - • . . . • ■ ■ •■ RENI�ON.WASHINGTON �--'— RENTON VILLAGE ASSOCIATES b I- I CAWNon • g. _ 0 I !" , . - � . . . . . . �_�� L — a TYPICAL FLOOR PLAN III l''', ,SIT. . ! r_,__,�� PASSENGER DROP OFF j 'T I_ ...Inc.. 1 _ I ! t I I t 1_�• I — — I —.- - . _ - L- I 1 I i I 1 �I _It;--{,i--I-I-II}�'L�._ T—�_�-- _� I IL--.-.umv.+.E ___ • • T • Mr♦ilarr POTENTIAL RESTAURANT i OIIIIL& OFFICEI -_— _ --_ - - ' - .. .- _ I\ h.w.v .. �r•evr) _I I \� • I I • .::}..,:!5,-witC.:,-Sc:".,r .� , I 8\ ICI I� E LEGN. \ I .- MIR 1 —I r . / l.s....-...s L— SERVICE y(pRIGOR 1 =--4 I SERVICE AREA II • I ' __-_ SAIL 1 RETAIL R RETAILS RETAIL l RETAIL 5 RETAH.S RETAIL T RETAILS RETAIL R , . ico..ru..i — 1 _ Aris f , • y - f —F {■ i i i t,/ FLOOR R GROUND FLOOR PLAN B • __ _ _ _ ___ ____._______________.___ _ __-_-__ _.___.-_ - . ATTACHMENT#8 A2 Im ., .o, e . • • • VILLAGE ;.. :: . PLACE NORTH 1, ptl pOOF OECN - if RENTON.WASHLNGTON < r $ - •ENTON VLLAGE ASOCAlLS . 0 ill if Di up . i o��, Gallen • - GAYOA' - 4om/r O/H4JOC I ELEVATOR PENTHOUSE 5 MECHANICAL ENQOS _ V • $/40 {AL,-. 1 - c....., • CANOPY ROOF PLAN ROOF DECK - — - - . ExW r a. f.YleE>SEO s✓te o.v-svo:e.o:u ro OE F e•W-`-c '' -— • . -- OrA1,OWN,. GONG. Z....,iu - -. _ _.. _ l • -. _- - -- _ fE7 r , • • GKuice N7EY U G,WNS ll ■ AN.Ell i� E NECX. • t . • • • • • • • ■ • TENTH FLOOR PLAN FLOOR PLANS • ATTACHMENT#9 A3 ' ._----- - - - VILLAGE - '-'. _ PLACE NORTH . .- .. pKL1 N,11.L --- -- -- -_ - ' - : - -. - - .J _ T = II EI 1 _ • , • .: maw.WA31IIG1C+ __ _� 1. � - ; WA,::111ICI11111!! ■ENiuT¢ AvawTO • fiF`� -_ -- —`f-� FPR.Ipneounil7 - - . . - molmmommimI�1 vt 'rr �_.-. �1 ' - =E= c=r -iiMi —��— iMi • NMI _ ��■ !.I ee - "11111 _ II�JI Emx„�.�..N/M.N �,. l01 1�1 _ _.. /�..vCns %FYN.K • =E6Cc==c c = GNSN. . I�I■I= �� I �,61 a x-— ' ' 1_!■l_� Mil I k v • REEF= _ 3 EEC= - _- _ c CANOPY S Err { _ I�I ��'_— - I �� 1■I I MM.e /� »,C% .m... — _ ,. . .. - - --.• -• ••., . -, •• -- ._ , ' • ..-... . . : -. . r `, V C.v.,/NY NORTH ELEVATION _ • y v'�i..>�"a4"e` ,vo•,•E EAST ELEVATION art e/o4..ce-rwc,f GS AG-MIL ene+a. •PaCC • • N rel.! ° • - „ f'.'tAintl� — : i�� }f CG[ C�CCt���LLGGE ✓BFL—EEs •i =ECCcLELEEEEEEEEtS -- - - .•• { ._I 1 l �'Hr,1-.t F.r.l..- C-•^^1'w�-mi'i.B.c s'""�...;� '•I ._ - I { ---- ' I_I_ r3F actF :Er I --- . . . { { �. { �s11.s1m�lra�rrwna>_I�srtr.� -- - - — I --- • - - - •1 � f I __ _. ._ ___{ 1 • Fzk I._.:,.__�_ ^ =resar:�eirratl { 'y • IN1 M _ _.. (MYYIT' .._ _ �sv. �Y� eEel�esEeHeM®■® �,� . . 1 /7 p LT n.¢ • .�._r '�' y _��. r-.f sCL:C.�.� Ypyy� :C���C.CC�' ate' emtwaru - - _ - - ._ �:.^• + �I .. ... . _- - �cc '�i - __I =r��y 111� _Z^:LEI~ C-CCCC==..—lF3C!...—.e is-=—� t: __� =I E :� =_• ` 1 • ,:; m/NO r6N4 rOL PPt1 OXE-ubr rnNe WEST ELEVATION - - • . SOUTH ELEVATION SMaCON FM _ NOTES aV mioz ELEVATIONS -' - • . COAc.ErE rb t i99.9E. IAo=t'e L/40r r Y--BOGC- _ C1L935 7D BE.SL{'yr1t.Y _ - .�EFLC 1flE 6u/E- MyGlL.1/N 1lLE•1D A4 -BE G4RFSei • - - . _- _ _ _�__.�- .—�T_=-- _ _ _ -� _ • NOTE 347.447 D COWL —__ ,__.— OG-G.1.E 7 GTmV(..- - _... _ _ __- - ___ _ __ _.__ - p�-.__5-6 _.__ __ _ _ - - ••. wcccvr fi�yy?/ Tea 6E RNN7ED •u.not�tttt� _ ' . L Mr.02.•/-DE/4E. - • ATTAC..... - A 4 - Im...._..�...� • • • • • . • 'VILLAGE -: - - . ._ - PLACE NORTH • - RENTON.WASHLNGTON RE TON VILLAGE ASSOCIATES Callison • rulrloce - - �� I I nG I a _ . .e ell , � JP 'I DN :f ' Nw D V it 91 lee L oi.l ja yc to E 7DG I 0 }E . he negneED I ' r A,,,y 111= V' ritil 747 L' rm•if. u' L=i I • _ tanks 1 nao.t 1 A __— - GN `1 I � /n,� ur I CIl�@ 7 W R /E Ii,c,. ) ID NC I —,M1�A.-,2- I • , _ LILT) SBw.T) 4)('s— fto.I-7 c•,uE 4.4.iNa • [a.).• = C1 a+a s) IIL I1 Ile x 1-0 us o/r , �I y: VeudeALL 1e�5p 6 ec;e Sc �r 13sec...f 4..3 .•... _ u C+La.$)(tPws)ol.' -'•� ay,e� Tile rsset. 1 '_ I o.••`'..•••,- �� , \ \ — a eCE31E4 Fi_ wlx�e iY TtMg EA.elec. RETAIL a/VP.,eI LJCa .....ART WWII- - - 2 I CQi..eCD aET/IeL NRa<J.14: (ua OLe 0\ as KS - FIOV/ATio: •+'}T.511E L 15 a1 012,114 RESERVE. II IN 4.043 • Sa-/55134A30//n4'i4,-IS YI �� 0 767�lE.nAAGT 60,7...4.� 'L�9 • OFFICE N.CKIN4 ..e . O1 emv,eal acme,Ir...., LEVEL 6 PLAN O LEVELS 2,3,4,5 PLAN O GRADE LEVEL PLAN iSe2.4.15 • GARAGE PLANS -I SI3...5l9.2B r*on MD use STO. easer We-mu. mX a 51?? ,u.+es-GJIEVEZC 4.4 N9 5.36 1N oce53.3. 51D. ror co 1ISe• .„,,,_2 gwL6 Ii`� ee 149 e.33 I Se Iga0o E-1Dr>l 40 IIS -7 IT STAUM2n.4104....Cr0 • T l. lgS SST 4mL6 r"La"EiTI. 57i eet..1 45- 3, 9 A LN9,5 ns+cE 57 37 Is+ +,l>�41+nMer �kxAu.wGTJ I•`5v.ot 1--901 =_ " :. - ---- - .. - -•-'-- - -- soTer. [8.T. `ON ORE 1u1J1.- 514 7715 9Ol ....,o . III SMCB Ill eeS,os ATTACHMENT#11 / A4.5 —•••— lu1 G LAGE __ r -- ---�-� - PLACNORTIS' -_ - rf_ RE TON,WASKINCION 1 , leDIT eAtW7 ap.m.,,i/m.l,,o�a gWEL4 1N15 a+Y. _ Callim .":1".Lw ,— 1 -----7--,.. 2 `\rli�/ tt � s��t'" \ter � `S _ _ - � ck� �j c ? . n�1t�a �a .. — rim i'. ir--- -34 "� :.�4 - is . „ ;.. .ter ..i.-�;•. ..-=.=''�.2� _.`_..C_ -•---^_� _►� - _ �_ . . _ r MU-44N nr6 CI»..L1..e:. �••• • _ ✓C..fdE RXE AV, 11,51 -__ __._ .. ... ___ O w vr r•or- 4-+e, N6..V o - - lwan' prE5 ON Seto¢ 1-/Wee aln'4e,m C.,o0cor-B-re,n iw.m. 7F'fl 014,14E P ,'nr 'C 4'14M14E7d 82',TNd DM• ,4lll 4<EY-sn4E P.WElfJ 7JW5aW. 84,062,5 7N>S 84) ��'}` ecac-6:mKvro eE e - — Yl a/4 ACCENT-C'Ne. WNwAlll LW 4'F.YEdi Ns. • (f - , Imo' - I ��.��v�� �s`a,..,11mt.. .0 NafF: H.avn .�..r Fir Mile i'• 7 tSW.bs' Mi /"v'�I ���1�1�Ce�idi?Elm,• P077114 W e -- — u sv�;1 ��4` l h1 ,.a as moils _I�=2,!' ,Yi ^ •-n� '�: A N��i��� �a.+�Ivrav�4 •lu -- ,�.�,..; . t m -1'.\�:� .1 ••vl 71,,.w, (2 1iy -.Y '7 .^-• �zJ'„ 7�_...,it�� '..,..„ � / ONot7/r AEVM/ON O AWN/ ELEVsMoN __ — 2 ,,„,,, „ /h"fib. r----------- --—i —_—_ • I ....... 1 I krvsa1•v I I i ' �rzrvra tnnwsEV, I r- izze,/r M,ivi 7Mr BM. I TFo1�E'u7o 8A7o I ---p. f:hvay 7Nls sAY- I pvica.}iN 7YE. I GYE.>T N4',was SEE {. OOLLEZA/N 774 --"-y— I I TV-.[,we. O 4 449 E- I s_r -�- :• ...E c.> .. .:,•;,, - „ ..,,: ..&:.,.... - ..- -:.- _ - .. CNS ELEVATI __•= — , - pp •� , a� GARAGE Q - • , . - - - may' `` - I� 1'd : „ • .. ` t! m 1� 9!! _ 0� ti '#^7�l _ -4 ss. . L •,,.t `T�:4:,\ yl.�y.° k" •v\- -, a . L.-.,. • .w 7Y� -ter... ISL.� - -�^"'�'7'-•' ram.- =�.1'� 3r. .. - ��If����i:! .Co.. . l• —I _ 690 f -- - -5rvevc4E_SEE ��e+vr ersv f.a� A5 "K' 'K'Y"E/O"TM e'p� ATTACHMENT#12 '45="' 'mtimemi'..M111Mm if N N>. VILLAGE Q Q I 0 PLACE Lvs+D.,La4wr LINE eFx 5r4�, To OE P,DONlED. ,<,��,.. NORTH 1 ii / i SEE cLxL.RE.4 aca. NLW zy„y er • i ' Sin. I TeVAN7 sre® I `C�' I . a SLH• ` RESTON.WASHINGTON • RE TON VILLAGE ASSOCIATES • 1�-, —� 1,—1°� 1 �"` �3 � .:s. .. . .may.. _ .. T— • Calrrson ' 1 Irv.LOLLNN•— �pvynNG IaLAVN4 ro R01-62. IN TILE OWE5r EZWATAON RE.Mkt v LE5$0111f2a0SE . y/NYYEfL.PLa$7E -Sy Iv. • 5urunaxY'9 Xeor. - ....,.... Y ' Y • • , $EEe NEW LONST kre-nory E£ G .4VEw N5ce.. NY i,WfWa• f •yp. SfGCPP>QaVT QD /Ca51OH u4Nr GiX7vP.E- .t1= 1- - .•" .,"e':- —. 4=7 L.. . • • . . ..,± . • . . .,,,„„ . . .._ I tgl:F -4 . . . • ••• Eq. I ELL 4 EB.- 4 I Eut. . O WEST EIEVATiON I NOTES VA/ LofOG — ID"o ILO" SyN/NET, Pc.o57VA.lY51EN ._. TO BC DA0,C.0 ' .r y/¢EV-aEM4E. -- - _ LbacFt./N rx.E-ro A3E — —_ r M4 N AGro/r —- CocoA?oN GFi/cC e.NLD/r44. 40,4,-45s LGFaGIO — MAfcn' EX.,7,1 i. — •. X •/!f>E,F2 RRNTT ID i SVN/.VEfw Y, PLASTER..SYSTETI •e Ek//irFf vA'SPt ULIloN . ., , SS'RErPats IN AEI.,LeNSTR VJ,ON I f NE/noo/7 Eb i !+.•„:'. -��-" e Hx'o c. i •rrr. A e SEE 1' % /©SVL. I I I • --[`'`- • i -- —I— �..& ',,Wiese,. - "!• STRIP CENTER �� ---_ .,- ,,.I .r�.A- _. _.a�......i:.'':. :,.L�' '_,...•T., ;:,ii.L . - ._— •‘? • J.N '� ELEVATIONS ATALELA/N 7)16 ---4" .�-La-_ I •`, DrE1• 4in uw,a I -$7 h I. :vc•. f �sb•= L O acn,.Y .ore,, - .u�"=--i-. ------- A=—}— .....e J1YE K` f 7 OnrelpupE'wofe�,. I _ ATTACHMENT#13 A6 .Er F1EEvM1oN • • • . , . . . l sse,e POIrtil. . • • VILLAGE i• New WALL - • • . PLACE _ _ _ T 1 - 11) use ss.1zoby biee.s- 1.7' - -( Ex'''r4-Th ..----62'."./ 747'-'1 -*C--..."....7."-- - _-__ - . --- NORTH i i ... co , F„.....,... all/514/Y by 44 4m. I . I I • eal TE//1117; &•-•E® I 41i, 54 m. ,i,' I .• - ,- ------ - ------- EMU 4" RENTON.WASHINGTON - 1 • REATON VILLAGE ASSOCIATES --. . . ME- : --,... . r. :w..__i IIPPLII......rdigliViac_fararTin .... .•r-r l'aill".ia ... Callison IIMMICZI-keg,. is ,..,,qmprar— -1.•_. . rp,,... .1 . • ....... ....._ . ......., .,..5. 0 . . !"". 7 Vilna 1 EMI Sri ::. •s:::-ilLIIII :I*: r........-. rip.eeN-Wel. EXIV171/4 44./2/N4 77, PARI-E2A11/ 771.5 0 -57-111.13/A17,1, ge.01,41IV!dm-ES-5,f777fOaeM"" • " NOTE.D. • . 11-7.,172, --- • . • sVAIWE•77C... PIASTER- yY7•61-1. . . . ,.....--„.r. . be.e.s4w/ sevr; . --- . ? " . NEW 4,1157-M.tcrrNy Qe, SEXE.) 1,NEINCON5M.K.7701!) ...,,,,,„ < •-> . . t" WHRIE77.e.-W057E. ,Typ. 61re.e,nerW77 . ! I0 1 105fP.1 twe/Iff FIX71/12.6- . - . 71 I • ---- •- • ' 1=------ . j. n. , tcd ,_--4,--_ -••--.,-=-.=--.., trii r-- ..,. --- • t-6- 4=7 • . . • •. 'novraEO AW-A • . ..-:-_. • — • . _— . .. . • ,. .. , . "s • • ...... .6' " -•• • - . • , . ' ....,-. .. i I i .11 i's"----.. /23./C.ZA/A1 »e. . e..- .- • • • 1 --I- AltilE5 on,eaza.G . •- --- 1 EQ. . SR. 1 ED. ( I • • 0 WE 57"el.EvA•-noN I . ZO'r.--14," '•,,N7lie-Ii.Arr..4.7:5.. .1 711 Be- 4RES,-.9e-14E. • 6u,•.,..EE,/ ‘0,...4-• 72,.„,,,,-,..h. A...VT LW e.,- Le- ewl4.914. ----- - ——— n.4.r _ Au,, eX/.=A,Za. - _ , •- . .......... , .• . OCS,AV/C-coA",Fg- ............., • - KR,4 " . • i 0 A/Cr,,A-e•EA/PA,New ....... I " ......... SYATIE-17C- ? . PLA672,2..6Y5X!"," 1,...ReVeAV,IN N,e-r-oal-C AEW orNISTA2w,..noN • OE Mee Fee, I •,..A...1/7. r.;-.,© 7Y1. • V (1)... ersti.,,,or4 can,Srevorao,„.7 , , . ..,..4.-4..' 1 , I 5.E6 t) . i I 1 • —.—....e _ --7.—— M=i . _1- --- .A --- •- _ ••• Jr . ......- - .-- =, __ • ...'Pea:..s ataf,•7'.. l .IMINIMIIIIIIIMIIIM '7_7_, '.,,' STRIP CENTER ,!1, n ----- _ ELEVATIONS _ . .4 . . L-4...,...61 .3,:.;.."..-Z.,. .i:............-...,--,ii.-,::-ii•lifu-:.•,,,...".!:...,...4.:,i.7. .,.-...;;?. -..,..1, .;.....si....:,:...•1_17-____. 7: ------- ..4 " ... .. ---lariaglia't"•:'::_ Itilik'' . .:: '-'...- . •--.. ..:" _. :L_.1. . k.----1--N- r • •-—-- __ ___ __ _ - _ .._ _ ex,,,e,,. 4.77..mly - • - - - - - ef., 7 1 ../e/lE qg RP/SEWN-1716 71 .i.• --424-1. I 1 - - • - . .1 zil-es 1 yie.±. ...-- ...... ... . • A6 0 kr67--ELEK4-P.,./ . • ATTACHMENT#13 • 1 fee4•'-," ".--,-............... vnN4. 4E0.oar. . - - — _iew VILLAGE • • tVI___ . NORTH I� W r.V'S4•!R.NGE FRAME.-1011111rII t A�..- �i RE,70N.WASHINGTON ��� M• I� ■.. S'Yc.SNFET. REMO!:VILLAGE ASSOCIATES ' D' V•lci'� I. .� I• ._ —p^# Srt.N6e a'//MNS. • m j goARD AC1JS RATie�7. i'>.� tEo k i 1.i quo _I I _ I �� iaJ -� •' l(R[n.rlEL7.)I • I ��T /.New MM/+re.vl SAW P • • i� L lyJfflF EA'.'TG. /Srfy.cor.{>iot�) NOTES; /= i -•!Z•i . , ' 1.pRCr%AE NEW Y-c.NCJMT/nYS. � . 3-ELECTR�AL feET, r'y,eF SE. 1. - 4.AIJ- LcWATc7/rN5 4R/>F7'+ _ . :• . eill.115 • _I! S Ara Sa. ...[E� /4/N� L II ... il_. _ u• Oq E7.EVM/oN O EZEVA7/aN OC ELE✓A- 0.2-EVKnoN. O�� OehirkY5I4N - - - v.•_...e I ' C ONLEP 3 .. 7 GE Et T. ✓FAr LERFORA7CD 9L•SNEFT EA.5/PE f pG -1/• S.S7 . VAE g4HE- - I \ 3T SF G.14 A r N GC... .J AMAZING, a .-�' i ,-Q. ----I • r--1 rIr ' ,t_ 6.':_•1" 4. -- - mI y�"7Nc.srz.an7E. 67 —/'rp 5rz..eo0. �r - (i I q, • 9'O� s7L_TYRE!a- i i' _ .__ 11 11 i i1.._ 'i ••-.-•• 0 sz sVM/ON a EL61'.(77oN O E2SVA-riVA! OD-QEVMroN- O PtIFN .elPRFr OTOWE12 ELEMENT { ,L,LOr X!k,45.e.Ys FACADE 7D E Ltl5/4NE2, BY Y7VA17: 7V Co.4637- OP E?/'Jr4 5. 6D% 7YS'LS S7TaeEF.lO/7- RETA/L 7O BE RF�tlN:p. 5 3Y/VTA'1Cl C PLASTERY SYST•E,I. OCOV/PE 7Yv. REVS NC.S L'LAo • SU.csALL tJ/ SYN7NCRL PLAS 3V' . __ - __ _ -_-_ � • TRY SIGN -7 TT EN TOWER ELE MENT - - —i EXTERIOR I1R1 +HHH+FRHIFFFR4HRH{H+411-WPrH{FFAP --_. i ELEVATIONS 1. J FORLEu//•( 7fl /bR[QA/K•VLF. .�..9 17 AlIWE 9O (CYCE<r 0 si m- . • OYSISM.) ..n..e O3 �urN t�e a iToy D¢ vxri EzEva-ray EwSn45 P�r A7 {_••• Va=[co. des,/..,• • ATTACHMENT#14 • . ' • . - . . . . . . . . . ' . . AWItHelk. 42.45ifar,44.5e74444- _ VILLAGE • • .... . , _, , 7.....--AAWY:AIelt.4. 14.44.4-4447/ . " . 0 - - .44.44•74,-A,74,44.4,-* PLACE 1.44.4.441'MAW. 1.e.voc 0,5444w% - - - . . . • arm;4 GAL.1•4440413. •.: NORTH . Wu AdolP IN&WO AAA.- 11 . . 441.4.0 &tact 4. Affl•06.4. •: on .1: illi - ' • &AI lARAtli'WAWA; • rt- 1 „ i1 111157•?..*'..'3;.F..21-`,..G(I33c,'-`,; 3. _.,T Af•liOnI.L.Y. . . ' • 4 ,_ % . . • .. •0 I / •. 0.____________---,------r--.- =tall.. Csw-A.Asf. , - :_ t___ 1 SYMNEIV...n4416. , ........._—.-Nro./.,g:PAAA.42.4•4441.4 AIL.84f. :,' . . 1. 1 • . ____ I • ......... • . , IF . 1• . • • ../' . zw.r 4.4,,z.mta. • r.r•,;(;:-.,sT,./ • • t ,I ..e,rncr.......srsa, : t, .-eeme.eat— * I ro ,,,I)Frry .GIV.4", ef.• 07 . . I ..1 1 • ' • • 444 tiiERISr. \i •I, I ..,..—......., .,:".....,.... I ...1.- ......44 ...c. •••••- . 41 •,11.1,. I . gA4..441....457 1 .. le. •••.12.11 •=reus ....:i. Al. : 0•1,1.0 L.... 1 .• . I. . . . \ , A? 1 <--, . ............,. , .. - _ I 1 i• , • ! ; i 4 . . , ... '.'•t":"-- •.. L- i - - • A ' 1. 'I',. ._:__--.--.--,--zr',.-..- • • - I.4 1 .".q4t,0 • . - % 0 c..•1.4*.1 PY& GC...74E IA'.77. ' 0-AA/ff/Y %., #.7/574•Sr/e//, ce-.4/7&X. • - 1..4.".tle ::1"or.,'• 1 ..- . .............m...- - .,....fr F OPEX. , AW74/E.5 .P a•.cir 4 • • 97RIP C..doV7Eff_ No woo. • I 1 . — • 1 7 o....afef4 57-CcW• 7Z:Ale 5,11,07,4P.916,4CD • - *NO PA•ov1-42...711o/cAc. • 11 . 1 i — •.: :al • . ... . .`? • . . L.00me- Nee Avre I..• : 7 . ......,-,....—: , I.Sef A4- —.—..A-FAA• • • u I O ........ -. ...---- __-- r.e..F•r- . i 1 1--- 1 . 1 . . ..• ..... • ., :.- ,-• . •• . " • 1 , , ., "••. . :, •-..-...- . ..,. I : .t.• - . • • . I it __._ _ . _ • _I -';• • ,.... • • • I Z. . . . .i ... . EXTERIOR DETAILS - - - .• . ., • ______ , ... ••••• , ' •......:. ATTACHMENT#15 Ag• 4- Ph417AI.6-LEvA1,o,,,, , ® PANEL 0 A I.o/ torNew 0 13.A I e-RANO- .. . - . --...--- % MO,i•oo. eo i,o- 1.4./coo i VILLAGE • PLACE EiE/AAA. NORTH A4✓N!T 7YM.L.Nr. NrLN.yuUBl —_ fil RE•ZTON. WASHC' Th RFM VILLAGE S 1TE5 II R _ Calfison V V 1 I Am N✓AG w LOW eaw i ... __ .......°..� OyalEp 1 /1 (d[E/f/NUOd�L .gym [.A4A4E� 'I I / ✓PN+N4 EYc. �A I I Iffy Q 41 � I; n ' r H+• °t11 \ om ill. Tiro-f/ECf ldD01 _I p ENTRANCE 1V OfLILC. Oj OFFIGE 6-C*- SEcnoN 4n=.Ke•— • • /N44 ow,-TD •L50N/!� - /L es MIMED-re nwrc. • /cooA. �1 f . jeGIFF TA/L. �I ZE •,,... ONEW RETAIL. aL..1)4• 5 -noN SECTIONS 19a�7 ,yE 90 1 «tee .. • • ATTACHMENT#16 A9 • • •. ( • . . I oaso FILM seo.5474. ,..,1,01 7.... • . • •• I i- 4111 .1.. VILLAGE . . . . r___I • PLACE . • - - -- 7-•- -- ..' .• - 0.6,/,..••• .,,,,,,•,,,,(-20111; ,4 NORTH • ,1' ,---,..•:- .\ ,,,- '....\t".. .„-- I ,.„..::,,, ‘\, „,, , --- s. : .. , I ,—-. e ,',WU SI-B •;•:., •., RENTON.WASHINGTON Cti • • I ' .---ff.', -' '' r•-."S: i'...\-SS v... W • f-e:17:::_:, '-• * I ..---. RENTON VILLAGE ASSOCIATES • . • . N•INI i I v ,,, ,A''''''. • CIRO • , w, Z JO"..4t1.,re,rtl,!1,"I'.• • , --- S. >\-\\k! 4 hy r'...41.4:„Y;i:J.-. ,,,,,,, 51 • , .•i' ,. .0.-•-•--' I ; •i .s. g is,41;„1.,,,,,- --- \•,..\\ . , • ,,,,, 0,4,,..,,",;•••• t; . , ff 1 • T ,s".,:r°,0*At-.4' ' .?• 1 i . ...,,,if .... i 4 Ai .4 ....0 It I 1 t,"444.1.... . g :1.:;!...6.1i::..At --- . 1------- -;;;;;;/.;;".•;- N 1 SEATTLE L • rRusr 1I 4.. .i14.4T.tizrii:j:. . 4 a_ • 1 , rT,,., , . 4,,p,.,....,-, !I ,..4, .D, BANK -. .1'Iv- 1 :•,4 it BANK ' . • • . 1000016.; . .. • i' h..;I Z ' -- ., .._ t. 4.,1 ,,'9'47: -- . AY W 0 I - • '.''`."':7"t•, 1 •' • .... c•-.,-- I ., .:•r!m:••••0:4'''4'-' 1 .. ..k .Hi',•!...1... g -4",,.:-I. 1:.C'f')' il ' • .4.,,,,;.,•••," , .. \\ .\\%\ ''I * -..: :,•;;...: • •......... '— ADY i(:--.i.;.4,.A.• _1_ •, ; •,...4...:...U. „':•.• 2 ;:,'' -_.- .. •• . •'. lte;''if f:RD7 Fr 1 I. 1,5•1151) i 1 ; \\NS-) .;•\\ , az.- . i : ! , -.:; ',.-•.,•-... ;•4;, :41 . --L--- . . • , „_ ...--.c,,J,..„,„--•,,- .,, . srA7aidg .e ;, I • • c7,-N • \\ •.\ \\\ . '73 t•OFFCES 23.,4,4" ,,r.th*Z-Z VI A* 1 • I. z •,,i-s4::"0'''•••• - .11 - -; i r, : l.\'':.\ \.\\\ts, ii 1,...,",-.I..•:....\-_E-Ig-w„ ,,,,,%9•:.:. .-- ; .,•....,•,, , :k 1 "- 11 '1 . . . 7 1$ • • , . ..... i ! 2 1 ',,z 1 li • . ; i 0 .. • . ! LI • 1 _J ...\ . [ \-.',4j . -• . : 14,... ,--7-_, .. _ . • , • „, .%,.,.. \ ..„, . , -... 1 ,,.. • ...... ... ,.. .2 ..so 13,, /GO 00• 1 I .t?, :..,• .H.--.-,\,, .• I .r. • . • \ 1.! : . •• ..6,r, 41• i ..... ...- ....'.....•`....:'•qL-•:.-'4'.4•;--..-t-i,--7-;',7 2.\;'..;6,---_::..•••• .2 __. 1 i - fl ..,-\\', •, ,\\ •\"\'‘', \s's .\ ‘., ‘i, :• t' . I..'I i 11 • * •• r_...., :jo- ,,,,,„..••-•,;;-_-1--- ...• :1 t., ; .. .1. a • , t• -- -., ........,— /` : -C.3 /7 11 .:15 = • • • iroi i 1 \..'. \\ „‘„,.r' ,, \\., \ • • . .. . .,.;•., ;; •'• ••• PAY41-SW k : 1. . :./ , ......, I - • I .. _ //` :• % '— •••• sed,,i.,,21.V.V3E• ;_ •\\ \ k . \ .,' •' • '. ' C • . ,n I in Lt— _. C. M 4111 ;Mil; _ •.,. ..,8•a Z3- .I .......1 - .-- 1.. -I.1 91 I • ' :‘. ...... D . 0 , a•1/0 DO •,.I 4.— 1 :•'• • \\\y,I,\\\\. \\ \\•• I. 17) ''' . • sn. ,•,.____ ,,.. , \ . • _• . \ -\\\\ : .---:-'-. . ‘.11....:: 11. 614 ,t • , /3--H--- . ----- \.,'•-• :.•f. L,•,3 6, ).., .. .. , • . 1. ; ---___,_ I k,,,, , I i -..... .12:.-f;.........., I. '".:. - „A k ;:• ) •-.. '!'i.4 ' . . • • , • 4 1 r, --,,-,... ., ..\,,..:.,.. I., - - IN1ALA17-ERNST •I— • . . /1.I/ ' Z•••‘ I• o '31 ••!,, „ i..'• 4 . oF _ ,,:), .. \\1' 1,41., ,g, • 4 ERNST •I'l::°, . 1 •.i ,N .,K \ •',4 „, c, .—. •— — ' ,,• °• ‘... `.<••' \ •01-'t••••• \ z•silt .. ;,,•, . •••1 . I • • 1 I;,1 1 .1.1.NDSCAPD An& • c.,VA, .;le" ,V\41ii, 71-' ZI .....,_.,_, skf, ;•,A., zi, . • --- ', 1 ,.....2- 41 ,._ .: /.11j e- .,. .... ,,,,, \\\%........:..s.?.:.6..i \,\\a tj,,,i ,„ - ; 4.54 • ''' Y MI' • • ..- Z il Jo of . i ,, WW1 •. ".': ' . IA • ''' ''O. \v'f9T \s'l\, \ S'2'.4 N I ...." i,. k 6--. • v . \ ,‘. ,..cr „.AANNI•••.-- ______\ ahl ...._.,.. \\. •••••• ........:R.,.. . ...-4 ' '\.L., ........• (. . ; • '141, 11N l',.. . :"---: ..Z.V7. • '': c. - -,5 , ',. .i. \\ ,,i 1 • ... . .,.... ., istiVike - ,-. • ---5orlf • .-_:- `••••:."- ,(7-3,..-....."....;;---\ .\ \‘''''-'-°°. ---..:--4---•:....4- - , 1\ - \\\ •, -— - i i ., , ....., s_ :,•- -+ ----54'.-., JO.I.O., \ ''''-'4% ‘V 1 ...' It 60 . - • '!q.--• . .6.2 ' •V". , '''--- -1.1141.7:,.1177/M•041grazir.:Tac \ - \ . • • i - 1 • ' \ 41,..A.i ‘ • ..‹ e . _ AalekW.75 00 kl AAA\.......••••• __ ... al':digv... .,., .0, ,...r,..3,„ .,„,e,":1,r,cfr,."f/_„.,,,........ . .r_ 'k..-•' -4.* 'TAXA44...1V; 151 ..,_.;`---, bi .,, ,:22....... • v i -. ' 140.•LAMM s' \\ It I ,r,,;11V. 1...„,••••, yRek \\..: ';' il -hkii":7'11 71-1 .,:r' '.1 ... 1...tb .,1 ; . • : . . • . : ,• ...."' e'c ,l• "A •r--.. : —. ,-pen—A-—r-v..-—— - . . , ----,....fr kl, .,.„. -, —,1100..;vER•:::, \ -\,..„., t.7.1. ...\•,.\, . ;,,, ..!.. .. ...."I.:7'3, \1.-., \), 3., ,3,-• , i 146.....• •;', • - 1,, •m k_t_I,W_I •,......._-'.,.,c\-' 4,,_4:,.!„... , .,..,.____J 1.,- ..,,,,, ., , , . . . \ \ •- •; •..•• ,• - - . 17.7!'—•'Ilik: 0 6 iik 1 ' s Sk.' ''',\ \ . . , / \-\•\1 .-. _ . , • r/ .•• E i'l 40=o- ...."--,•-•-•• •• EXISTING c• % ! .,''',/ . - .,\ r, 1,12.1:-• ; •- '•0 .9:,,- • se; -II .:::;:t :17-2,-_-; '..il.---1 :-----„ ' . kr- 'CONDITIONS, : '11$ . :.......--- ;;; T; • • •\ \ ...,,•..., - \\ ••-e — \ ...:;....:: ''S -<;s.(....,...00.5..• oN----I, ;-I •, • ---7-•;,•`41:.,-;.1 - fT-';1- ; . 1- i ill ---i''• . ..ZI -• •••,b, ' •••••), '.j7. -- \ \ . , • ••• ...iii `• I . ,,., ..3'''-•-•-4• :--, 2.-..•._-_,:-.._--.. a.1.,,,, • . 1. 1.mc,,Y1-- st."''i • ;'• 1.i ! ! S 7- ----- ';'S...:-."---. o;" ' . ‘.. • .. 's.. ';;:". 151111:: \ Aystr. ...- ' •. • ' . t.:,-- _ :4 .. 1 • :, ., . IA I-7----i,,.1• i'- ...,'-•'• - .7,..r..IFE-T 4.. r•-A --, ,--- \ . . . ---f \.-rf -. . -\ Als ...• -,-,7,-7, i-_-_-3,,- • -----, t.:--1 7 -.# - 1 •.3 rali,.— ..e, ---i - -- _. 3._....7._:-._ 1.-,...„ i_,:r. 4.,f._.,.,....if -!1'I .11S • - IA-. • . ---v,:. • . i• -": ..›.- - 5: •47..-. An• _.-.— . ...- ... It......' • s;k1 ‘ .." ...4. 4 . .aa . 1.--7 , 1 • • 1 / • 4.cf -,-t ;:- 1 .., - --• -,-- .—,3 .- . - — _ — . i -G1 •••••.-,.,N I A.i.-- .' ; >I .47771 '. .• :-. ATTACHMENT#17 I I .1::: ‘'.1-1.. r--1-- i• Ad . I i• • . .4 , ... ... . . • ' . • • 1 r-q z 0 1 • , .: wr 161 i 0, ! ! I ! c.. ,.....• T4 LI_.,,.I g I i 1 I 1/ , g 11 . ' • • i '1 ! : 111111 • 111...) .' ii..):;•%));itItt:, '. "--r."`I''.', ..,..i'•ci. -: .,4•.• ''.. • .,',I...•. •)••,-.--) '...k•:.:."I''',. " 1 ..i' ,,, ..1 , ''. ';;d:,..3itg....tep • ) :, Kpiti,, 'r))..,1111 f: - • 'IP' . I:V' Iffilkiiiq • . Z :. •:::Illrggillyi.41.)' .044)....11,.. , .4).4).41 •.).• ", C ...: PI:'i.,•:- I ' '' '''•''7•': il . , ,• , - '. ir.ILif,..) '•*.• :-).' , ',...)", ".: •) . .,,...:'.' . . , 1 ';',..- s'..:.• ''-.L',-. 2.1.1,' 'i . - * ./...,--- P -,-• tu '4,!: -:: r ' ,,,,..lt't, w . .'1.1r. , ' "g .-i....:' .. i•'', ' Ar 4.". . •. • .4t.tc.-r, • - ' rtejt;',1411 1 L 6 1,-i • ........ . : .• ,...:',.5',41. .111/1:fir„Tifth.:-11 a: I: ....,'-',',- - --••• '• •!...:N.••e,.,..•••-:,i,, ' ••s...-0. - 41 --L - iiii• : •61;i• • 1,• l.i i• '•ii 4-••••• ••••.. r.- , -1-mt. • 1: .....i. • •L....:..v.: 41.2...' •• ••• •s•. .....4101/2 ...„ ..„ ,.. ,...,.4. ..,:.s.s..,.,. ,.,......, . . • ....,..z, .i...7„...-/ ::„...••• • .. .1v,v..? ..... • ..1:•,: .. , . _ 1111:Al . i[o. IL .11.St , . - -- :•• ,:i...;:',.qf,,i?."r..''...; --.T."-•',. •...:••• , 0 '4.i. r•" •,..,1./Aki,,,,,,„,•.,.: t• •. ,k, Lt... : .'AJettillAili. 01;;AVF.Z.Z...PR ...' • .!' '5.:*i.:.11,1i . /T.:.4,;"e. ...• ••;'),-,•• ::s':•••,r-)4411'''.. . .''''• A''''•••'. • ' ..' ' "ii.in • • ,y vita. ,....„.,,:.,',9'•,•,. ,••••,•:!../.': NIC ,fr., I* ''.'4"j III _ -...11 ..r ;., ....,, .•,.... ;.. . •,.....,,,.,•• . .. • ,... . 4.••• - ;• :, .7... • . ''• -N . "i • r, gill ii- 111.4,:i. ");.•T ...).t), "I. . ... -..;.:.*•:,.'.f. '' '''1*'•• ;' 41.• . ...."' . - '114'Ill 7.1.1 hiS'.. II /- • I- s .. )• - !. 1 --• ..." • 1:Yr. ' '•'. . •I'"• 'ic .lt •. •-.! • -.-• •••• ''---,4',-..1-...1.---'•-•- , •.,!:,r...4A:. ; .., f, . ....,. .1 i.•• •• ' - .jip.,'t:0.,,-4• ml'''''.•:',':'-, .--**.: 1.,,tr::1--,t'' ,, ,, ,..,-...,,..1,z.1,, ' .L+111';'. # s'' 6,d• 1: 3.540„.40.19-1 1 „, • . '4 4•;•'.. ":\ 41';-:-• - ' , .1e,. ,..11.ttr ".2 , '• ;,-7...,....,.K.-•.0•4...J,'I ARN9.4e4. PA.!•• '1•PC,',',....., '..4 :: ,4: 1 ' li '',:j .. .•• ---- \ l lir"- III i. . •17-_,, :..1, * -c...•,-:''..--•:..'"••'-;111./ .,, ,..1.41.,1i. • ,‘ .' \• • . • " •rfi ;,•... ''. ..'g''' • ,..7,..., e....",,:-..• k--• ,••• ..-•,-,, .; ...q. ..\\ , • --A i.. Vr'-•',,4. 01:1.-,4. . '•\ .,,, .... A i '.. '-.:......_;..;.7.:7..; •:.........• . 1 1/2, \ lif 3 , • il Lit .•.' -I •4. 0 i..., ,. ... I . . ., ...1..! . . -. ,,.,.....4,-,.....: •.. .4 - . 92 t7 . -•- • e- - . ...o.t,..-,,,,,.....1, . . • 4..,%. IP.• '1. • •-i i . 51•::..5..7t.. ..e. - , ''''., •••.•,,,, f •. ' .., _.,4: .4 ee 7 i..4.•‘. ./1;42r''. 1 ' . • .AO ,,„,„ .:- .... - .-.....- .i.111:-- ..4%.- .....,,-; :.w..-..--...--.... .4......,'...t...-..-.:.......,---4,4. "il . •••.,,..,,d4.5:C•4U,..J2-1e..."*Pattg.,..f,.•,..• . • ' • •14r. .•.-: LI .. . ,,;: •- , •••,;-,-, •••,,,-;.- -..,--T,'.....- ..--..,,v;-.k..:•;• ... ..--1147.-.: •• - - -A."''' fr•--4--•• ',, '',,O•'. ,4; /0. 44.1 . ›•,':.i.../ •.91%.• I . p• ,i..v.i•,-:: I ,, i-.; ____ '140 '/ */' '.1*'. , ./.9,-•:-. 4y•.;....:4 . ''3'1' ; . .i.•.r. •,-, , • ...--.L. . . .- t• /4, .•.•';'; q45?.; 12.. ,,,'' -r ':'''':' t. ...:-''' ',i'l, 1 4. .,1 1 ' ,....+J, ' \ . V • t'x 't• 40.,. . .:'•'-':.:: *' ' ta• ' i . • toe , •/ e .... ,. , 4.,;-• ,... ,r,...:-.C.oy• ..r. 1 1•/• /."- 1 .r .. . , .. • .,. • • ,,. ., .,• •,,,.. .,,. .., . , . , . •.., . . .. . ._, . . ..,. ..,,,,..., . ...... . i .,. /.. It-, .,,-• ,•)/. ,y; ''' , :/;,{....4... ,k.. . ' • - 0. 1k.. --,,,!--1-1!.f.ii,e; ,., v. k ....: ., , ...p.,li.,...1,:..:1.; eV,:,/:, • ••k: ,..'... . . • : .. . . - _ -. _%=3,...... ... "" l'...1 . . • 4 .4 ..11101. J.7 (I;411. . .......,,, ,....y•,._,.,....,••••,:73..."•'''.1.'r ( i • .. \\''4; .%.,;12.T.ligit'-‘4‘.';(il .• : „., ..."4". . ..4.1 . & f• _,.. ;:.,,tv.,'.. .44. .tAi:,) t . '.....:XV.P,..o. ..• .. 1 Ili.,Atcv41r.....)neuria-4•41YPIatt' ''" • •- . -, '',i)ki.'-'..'---,;61, )441.. • -....4,rts-.-rniAlr.t .... •••I•1:0 -4.'.• . .oursiagriwinirLeCii-vousii. . . '•. . . •, . ..IC ir• 1.4„, ,..,, , .77 . .,,,, I p.-TErejlivrt,••o•.'7.1 .,r.•r 1.1" ''4,r.t.1,:iitgi‘?Zi, 'V:l',":•1:::,- 1; Or:Itgra:..7. 1.Igy •...; ;',' I i.' ,..7, ,..4.1j,..ai.., . .$, ,k•r:,e.,.'...i .9.• .".. • ,:i.111-:0•1 NI., II k '''f,V11.;'et• '-elii.•• ',V9•• '•.: • ..6.:..._•'.. 4..;!...r.•'.9' ' .....• •'' ..., •/•••••:', - ..%• _a • a'r •.:0 -a,. 1..J1. 4-4.11.1' ...5:1 ...-•-7....›.,7 -,:t.„,, 1 7. il ',.. .... ,,,••••••.'.• .;-...,..*----- ... :- :,..*:.•-• 10.-'•`:v.i.:.• ->)•''.-:,-. •A 1. .\ ,....:4:-..4.. ., -,.....f...-:.tiy4. .:::,,,c),.;',, .L, ".' ' • • .•- r ' • .s..".".0.4 ZI --•••-s."‘V• . A.;:...... ••• • ' ,•-•.:•••;Or>er`.'44.;•,,X. . ".:- -tiggiVritV.f••• 14 t'i • {I N". '''' •'•-•#•;',1.Y..k,i.. "•,)' ' :. •-•••'•• . '•In?' - .. .... eVI" •• '''•••.s.-": ,stitr .h.,„,•448..t.I.% ):::„1.' • , ••_ • . .4.,.,„•',•,' V ' •)I. ,... .. ' 'f, ... '•1;.:•‘-;•... .-rr';•,.. : ..., ' .... •;•':•4,..,..•,..i -.,... .k.:1 0 . . -'t,„•,•• !,. ..c-•;: . '.e.,."'•99•(./.11'1 /511111131 '`.:N.•• , 1 4 9••..,„'..1 ...,,•'. : dOriljut,...:''.111i 7'.,1 ^',' • 'ArC71"1/2. ...sf' •,„.,:p -: ., . •:, . 1.-,.•,r,•!.. ,- •, .,.A,. ':-. -1',.'.:;::.-•:,.-4A1.-N ;. 1 -, „'.- • .••.: .. *';.1.:i••14 ‘C • 4 ', iii •-,..••••!•,,-.1”..i.i4,>,t'.........,‘'•':..‘,1 :' 71c • .‘•j•:.::•-,; '. .4f, •• ..;,• • „• . .,....,....•::!.','!:':.•,•• ; • . •.- --. i•,' ' ..4, .;:11. k4;'%.:;'. . • e I ti 1 • ....;•*r.i:• ,,, ;:t ; • t 1.;•• i *14!.4:' K_•;•;,•;•••,'-,A.,•';: :;'!..'.'•7'.;-'.:•.:4•t ..: ••"?. ;:' . . .. •,, •,...4 k : '• ..-• z•••1••,V. • '' \•- •;., ' .1 .'.i. .:1•••••`-.. ‘ t r tti 1 .:•„...'. -. -IL ''-.'..f:-:.1. ‘•:n'..;•••(.:•: • C '.......'...'':".'•:;0.-...IL:40 IS' .,'' - • ••-,''• - •-.I .4:-... \r‘. \ ,••7:-.?., e; . 1: , • I.., •„;„. , -• /.A: 4 •...-.1;,:•,•; fr•••• ".•,;.,•,.."):•/,.....,,?!;•-:,'"•• ' u".-'.. ,s' , •-1 ' •' •• .a f i 'I .': . .., Ns, ' .''.....••••.,C L...,',';..':Iiiiji•i 1. ‘..C.. '. a'1 ; 1,••,t •A• ',:, ' . •;'-•:,.. .:‘"..14'. .4.-•1kft;:r.'- •'°,;-- %I.j....:,49'3). • '••,i .,-, 14'4'7'' :' ', (L..., v•- '‘, 0.;•• ',,'••L,••••,.'-'.41, '•\... ':: ., • t, • ..!..1','. 1. , ..r:1'12'74-1"--•"'.!• tell k .: ., ..r t .. • ..-. .. - ..,.„4, • i 0. . so ..• ,;Y ...,' ••s-f •••• ; :. • N. '-t3."' - • ."".:••- '-'L :: r . .,..• , 3:-....-,k .. "k, • -.. L...,, 1.,...-1 . '. ?.z. ' • l '.••• • ..• ;.I.' • Is e '' .1•3'.•-.- ' ', - .' 1 •• s'•!'t % . 4..-••• . .1-: I '4.tr .• % '.`i•.... %., 'T'o:•••ti.%,,.4:,:lfg.., 4,,,..,••••, „• cr. • i. wo qr •,,,,, lk.t_, •' t • ' cl .! , ' • ''.. ',,• „. ....1 iillt , 1/4.,,,,,c,.‘,...__•_ t . 1 •• . ,• , % 119X:,.. • 1 • ' ',Ai; ' otri.14"•,..1:t .' •,.. .. ••mil S., ..• . : '- •• ' 44' : ...1',A,. IT.' • ., VA r'.;• , cf•rf e ., _,'-11"-, • .J5.4....".• is' l' tlle.f. ' •!.1.;•'i ' 1 .,,, c • ../ '.* _•• • '.k. . '' .,....,.sef-1,.,. •-•.,,.,. ,..,..r.. i,; , •••••,..• . . . . I its. riff ie :.ri-f '..- A .....-..74...,•,:. '% .'... t• 11 • rrf ' cr' . . • .• .•',- . %•t•re • ....---.,, ,t,44.4,'-.!-Ai,-_,. -- 41-t •:;•.... . -. - . %, 4,4 •• . .....--•••.„--- ..,.., ,c,iyit:••• . • • `,.••• -77 -- . •. giffm, . ..". . , :,,,..L..-•..i ...''.'f.,.... • - '', - . ' 'biz ' , -'.•(•"---... ..- • , , - ,.,• '71' i' ‘• • .II ,a• 4 .. (' •. ..,:,!^4;IA 1.-,4, ..,.-.•,,,..,1111'• • , or. • i•• . 6, •„,, . ... ., v.i.,,,.',Q..• •••.. illir Nr: - - ,... . •4••• ', t,.N.. .. , : : ,, _-, :,_, • •7'"•*!...-.Lrrloi.. 2 r . 9k/ • c4..1 1,'‘' • ".;0'.' "i .,'• :.,•'. -'...!;:s...,. ' . A 1 - ..• , s.' !0 .:- '......` • • t 0‘. . " • , ci, .,‘• •4,• . ••• .1, '• ''.: A. • ' .f,,,,,•A•r•> • • • 44k.,. • Ati''• .• 1. C '. "- ' • . 4:!1".? "' • .' ---- --; -.;" ',%:L. . . .% i. ‘..... ' .''''....: - • ,A.",•.•.•'', ' ...,A.....,•,S, . ,,i, i NI,i , 1 • .I . ' f i . ..4111r. •• ..0-f-t,„ _ , . .., ,si •,..., •.....„ ,,.„..• .,,,,,...•.....,„ •••;.. ••••• .. ••• 407. -- ,dir. ._,• ,.,..--t,c;?-7f. •• !I.. -..... ....•'Sir., .,..\!. \it., 7. .,,,,,,..,`,-; .,. ... Yi. ;Is '-•,,-'''',-.::,.• ...i.•::.:4, 1 ' ••.' - ;.1 .:i..•:•,..- . .:11A7..\.,..1;:41,-,„•• 4.;/ .:, '''?,..*.:S. :--s-til.'.:;,• •:wf•• ••4•.sp.iii-•,. ..,, .a .,..3:••••,::`,-::••v"..2. C.•••'•....7 r'. .iii,':a:''• ' 'I • .'' ' . 6 IT. . i.‘,c• '''Y ' ' ...,4• fl\ • "I',,:;;, , 1.... --). '''- . ..")..,'„A',4' ..,::* -...1:X.•;''s•t; •A"Ar'r_,.1.0410,.._.4••• * t . ., . • \i‘• ' .i ,,,,,,ili.',.• . .7-'1...„:,:• ',13-,--- -•-,i,'•'-•-•!'. • ' ; . Sh . . .' .1...6,...t4)•• ...e, ...t•t: •',OK • :LI.7t,! '. • ', . ,..•11.1., • . I! • I . • • ..../ I. ..,,.. ,.• •. • .." .0.4. •41' '''''4. efl'. 1,,a,' .... ,,,i4t.:•.,, - ,-,•••.. ‘.;. i. -,-. • 41ii \ lc - . • . 7".••• ',a • ! . :• 4c M.Ti • • l••i . ' ' • .... ,,, ,... . •010. ,4 ,,,... ., .l:. r , ••,, , • • . _ *:iiIii g7*-44•' •i;.r", .‘ ; '. ' '''... •.• %.. ; • i- ,• -1 •--1..-Ju'i.`,.,` k• t ' •••• : • ' "i . ..,•••••• .•:.•• • .:' •.• , • v.... • •••i •••'.....• • - •• •• .„.4.-,,E.,3•,..,:.,,g.-.....r.• - • . ::••••A•'-. s. 1 ' ''‘ 14.:4,..." . v. . . L . .16t#5•1•77.r-s:, rk'-' '`.1.--'r-3TC iff, ‘1 ' •. La . - -'1-7. •• LLLI . '` :7.14--1:•!. .-... ,.. ,if,kt a. •-ti-;1' t. ii, % :. ''A. -. gt4rit ip . 't...7L!L •,'''• • _-- \,. . . - • 1,', \'''. " ''. . 7i-L-' • ref • .I. .. • . ..; 4'.'• • . • . , . • •••• ., t ,.',..4•- •,, ,‘'••, •ii,,-,'tv....b-,... riv ,.. .„.,,,,..:••• . . ,.. . • .. , . ,. . . • - '1'.. • 1 -• ci ''• 1.1 -!. \ - , 4 '1. . - .„ 'vs. • c. ,4 i 1'60 i ... 1 • • I ••'„ it P " P.' ' ar.. • •• -ego so. ...., ., - - ei....• _.,,.1... -2 •.., 4. 14 '.. • .. • ,•,, andisatUA, •i • . i.:„igi,S• '.r• •• ' opas •• /fl,t• ',•'f-4'.r• . -v/ Nrim... c. Aledpwr .- • tikvir. / litho, • 1,-- • •-- • ••, •4*I';--• .• , 4-3(e: ' 4t... :I, s s ,`4 \ •\‘•• t... \Irs, !,-,- ,..,• , ,. ••• • -...•• - . •! -,------gl- • \ ..e. (A• • A • ‘ V.• • I, •.. ,.,, , . i op 0:4. : • . ,. .. ./.•.: 'A'.c.,444, .,k,..'; . i,!ir /41157--Pr14:. ti.:..,'„,•-• . •‘sy. .-• • • • •. . . , . . .. •• • . . • , • , i• „. ' . • • • . )•• . . ,.. ' ••-' .1, , • -J 4 • •. _,.. - . • • . • • . . . . _.. . . . . . , ' . . • • • Callison .. ' ......... - ........... . ..• " G CITY I'...."5-ft-1.71; •:, • ICINP.P ..f. ••• ' WIGN1 COUY J NW 19_23_,5iPT. OF ASSESSMENTSDIRT f- • '. r.1. NE V4 19-23-!.• / OF ASSESSIA ,.•.. , • qry-Amen • .1. , • ' . ! ' _:,.. ::t, 1 r, '-'..;IMP....'if,:: • .4 1 j 6 , . •Y;:i : '3' • ''.170.7-.4,%'1 : ', 1....._ . . . , i-.....:::..t,..,;:', ..-• ...: .r,r,'";; ''''''Ef-- ---' 0 L} . - . onn an I,. if,:;',... ".:',JI -r. - :,..• '- ' tr.r.=.l'..,.....i,.' ....:.':".:J.:-:• \ 4 --s.t.-..,-....f —..,. .j=i ...m:..'""*""ii''' -,:".• -"" 1• 1r'• .' "•- .,.......... ... . ,• 1; / :-•.: . 1-:: -' -: - " .--- '-'7-r-•--r*;... .....• \ -: ...,... s...- . •' ...1...r.: 4 . '''' ''-' ...?0e.iti •-,,:.-"'.•.•-v i.--• .......... 1.i -.... -.. , - ......, •i'i '.- I 3- ,---.4r.....4,AF • ••• ..ruer'.. .- ,___-__ - ' _..m.---.- I ---• • A _:....- ; • up .._. srrli _ .__,.......• -". .:1:3 -,,./ • ,• '? . • .,...1 •_gi,„,00EN .: . .ff —,..,,1 -....,,, -.. -•- -4rAil i r;1 01. - . z . ,.; . , :, ...-yr-.T.s z .‘f,••, ,-;_:_,,.., ... • Fs,...,...1, .. : ,_ .,,,„,__,.. ............:,15=.. ..,.. .---- .-.„."T.="ryl.::+,.• - Ili-..t., -"TT", 7 4...7-, lap. '''' •.; 4..."47LiWgrat q,-.1i-..-----•--t4-r-11! MEM 'i• ' ;,.. : _17 1 ., r.....F.Aili:;,'".. •-1 -•• .. -°. ‘e .,.... 1,,isk-ri:s:gg;7filt, ,-r,--"•••,' ;,--:iti,7,..rmrs',32 -- "": _____ ..,hori.t.,..p..,0111.0%,.•• ':. .q......._- _‘ ....:.1.1...4:-•..-: •,:..-sw,..i.1-7:7,---;--,--.1- '• Mn.-,--,' ''''T.,.-11.;,,:.,.....3 i 1 • ' .:"...,,,,-4.---_, -2*-17 iiisen-g5t.• ,.'_2,•:•:---,1 : .._ %....7"" ',-,---'•-•-•••-• simikar_,_,-_±---1.1,:r.-'-'-----1.•••7 "ma%--;- ....: i•-, ...,-,.,„.„ i 4 ,1 ',7.5-3 I I% ----- . . Zalljy-j,''',i...,•••• '11;e:AV:::1:-....1 .:'":"..,,-1 :•••5....";-::1•.'ri ...5';‘.iiiLal '1 •---.':,.;',N%. 11%.4_„ .-,,/,.i f . . ', ; •. . ._ -- '-7gi.firit''• .',- "". . --."---..-7'-.:1:": .---ii-Cil. --.' .-,.\,-.-•=.9 ' .,••\ -t i. r .,, -.Id!zt • ,''mrimal --..-.7.73-....i.:-.7.,.....,1,,...______ ....-,.-:7.7_,- 4 -s•----- ..- Li--------'- •,--•- ., ;,.j 3 ,„ ,,." . =MI , ...• a, _ ..,..„...7-,-,-.rn- . ,...-.....,,,. ., 7-:•-•- .... ----1..._,____. - ' •i'iri:1.--r -.• •,.....---Ps,-,..7..-a .----. ..,m,,..,.5. 11 ....la:A ,:••. 7-.;-.4.:: . !".4:..,a""7. ..-...",,• 7.- ..;; .--- .'-'.'1-• •-,--• - -' •,•";.; ?.• •:•,-;itli ____ .." ../- I ..,-•....F----:;--,"-:•:-";•-. _}....-,-.•----",:k., --' ...r':7. C:-,'',:l's.-,--..1..S.-- -' .19111 ..0 -.41-7,.-1 . --- :.:.: FECW .- let--.,,.---.•-‘\.,1.. -7.'....L.... "..-.- . ‘,.. ' - . ...; , .1 ',. ..„. '''ci r -----,------,,--- ..-...-• :,--.. ...*-•,-,•-:•:.:•••—," ,...,,_,..-.7-..,.:-":-..1,..!••••• • . ,,••.ta . ___•,.. • "1:: c• i 7 %.:.:4,- .3!..?•‘....."-; — --_,. •--,,,_•—.,=i•=;:-.=-.,-;•..---i __C,., lii ....,,,,, _. ,.2, " . -....v‘t ,' :-,<:::•!---- ,-,i1 :=---.-r '' -,. /--'=:- '' -.t'N., -'-------'' 2-1(1•%:.11 •-•,"• -k• --IL. "'" •., ••;‘,..• ,. .....•...• - r, ...,-, i .;;-,-,;f:, •,:::,=(h—,L-:.-:-. .. ..2-4.z.-:-0 lk-:.::,• • ..-. •:Ik --•',---r ../_ ••• ,.\•....--€,-- • !,-7,-;-.. .F.: -. =,..... ... -- - •- 7:7=L: .,fflm._,... *,---•-•' z-:;:--1.??..i.,.-/ ,,_•,,,,,,s i2,.:: -.• .,•.... ....,,- ,,•-....:L._4_ti , :., -,,,, 1 -...• 1 .\:."4 '. ,..,--.:. ' •,./•.,,.„:•-••4:-... b -='".- 'i. . ..::'I'÷':-.-.G..,!...- :it.,--ii;'..1'. .',1 7:---'''', -,''t:' -' ' ' `.••01:Mill -..- : .2:--. ...=-:2.`X;'.•I`f...•!:\.; .:..'• , • -`3 3[ C`9-••%... __-••- ••:11_,_,...,...--,-.-,-411 r...:.•.,_! . 1 '1\ -el" ........-. -.....i'i "_.1.-T ,L:t.•_::__ .U.,;/..,.':."..', .;;..1f..,.,:..'._•:..".:i• ' ...4...tj. .,. 1,..-1-..:i:_..,..- -'•' •,'o-•"h`7•-•„..,_.;:`"••.` * ...........- ...__ '....--.V.•:"*.l'EiF'2i'•:.;;;-.".-i' : ' VICINITY PLAN VILLA PLACE N. ATkAC-IIMENT#6 -kt.-. ._. ,......,, ._. .—. ....,.... .. . • r. . ATTACHMENT #20 ------,, ,__...._... • VILLAGE �\ urn �• rJ PLACE NORTH n Noy-ig- . HMO PARK AND NCO % _ LI I - / lt'-i RETON 4I N'ASHINGTON �' - \\\ \ •l'� T REMON Vp1AGE ASSOCIATES 'i4 - - �'-,i ., i _ ,T~\ • �`��`�)\\_.s�\ --,�• \' I�,i?DN V CaUison a• ny aiay. - ,�. ` ,_t ; 1' uO SGNUHSKyy Ew0nxe raaezxa � $ / ' ;i y -..i-�A rroraw ra.wicr Yr �• {" ; QTAP wa w+w sa ` F,SA AarWOGaMb,i _ KK =n-n-- _ .f a ' — — , �\ \ �\* ' ;:' 1 y AG iinrcto . ■ y---- V' ;, -- --l • J\\\ \\\ \,' - N.M- ft~ewR FLwmM win .3•11 .... ' o' ' r - ,_ , i te too --e _ e ' / /II./7;61/ ://////'/K 1 ..1 3//i// , ' • /// ' 4= . Li : G `ON ; ';: • ,, . ', c---- _��_ _ p I. y . _ , ''. , C 3////f/ 4V.". ' ' • • - ---�1.-i I•T cKA T/ - J \� \� \ • i j�v.'tl�/I`1 - -- -,,, • • s +_.:41% \ t Y ,i / a4 '.,. t''''''' \ �\ • . \ . - ..'1. . -. _11 7.',. GRADING n �. PLAN • ON6 Fb6NON Rl+Cb ��'� rl a. F \ iiG6NKA{/ UN6N/t • ATTACHMENT#23 . . . ' . • .--- ---- I/ c- /,__ VILLAGE . Itsv . • -- -- ,.--- -- /-7 ; ---- - ----- .... _ _ _ . ...--- -- I _./ PLACE , r ------- .. H wo . - NM?AN:AND KIES ; :•:\.-;..14/4- --- , . ....---..-- ---- \ _. _•- NORTH -.._.-- _ „. ,, / h _,_ , L ) RENTO , : -i _W . ; . RENTON‘1.1AGESNSOGOTA OENS 0 - • ' ----.- . : . __ . . .-. - _-- - ; , ... ......._- ,..-.:FT- ,.._ -......1/4_.-- ... --_—%.-\%\-\\'K\ 7 ) ....•.-: ___.. I ! I- . e- Sltierrs1 VP R. • .. • - .. ' awy way 1 . ' -i 1 Callisoet __--- . i ; I r•IT co, - 0.4.44.%* ,..0...... ........-.- 1' \ I ; ' 5C,105Ky 1 : 1.0 ,0 • ..of 1%•10,971,1 ......., ............- "'•--. ''...- '.-.....i.i ...'....,,. .7''..‘. • . ' / i • I , Wad ...... IVI ---,--------1--"f--I, W, •\r•7-\.‘'-. . . . . . . / .s.el • tolway 50 ar.f. . 1 , i . • . . • ( ; • WIMP 54,1•Plfy Sfoos MARE ., es;144 h•fIrPsi Va.r.holf. • - c---7,-1-- • .„,;___I• r, • imrfwAy .11 . . 1 ar.:,-- ........---.--- . , i ,,...1", \ '.'..\ \ .•-•--- MOW,SWrliay VrtiC.LoG ,. .,,,, o•••••• ..• . . .1---4:1, - i ...-- ‘• I- ; : .4 / --r: •' 1 , • 1 . i . • ..--..- -. i 1 3/ . x 1 . , ......_ ,.• MOW,was.. / I c ' - - ,,..........,..... .. I . -,..-ki -- tAsSiss lakainto t wow.. —, • A, • . • i-, L.,.„, ---_ Tra...m.irac WI,swum- .... /: s.> . • ' 1 i '— . /• 1 :1: _Ti-j...j 1 ; . .. <.> I ! - ':'-- '- -... . —T— Mall.i•RG Waal. a I•Pe. Me obeknote•rr weeKeva •.r 's\..• \ 2 i 4'".......e.‘ .i.•,i grWS\\\\\'' •\\\\'s • r) . /1,' I . =..6. a fad IOW DIRCASM-Wo6 i../.. 1,.. ; : I 1 I. . i . • 1 CS lartat ma,466..v. I , • - -..1, WM.ft*rin.f i 1 • .., _ 1-1 r•••Tots • , . //, //......„.,////' I • • v ilameo ME Iff014ff _./ • I ..,_!I . . __ Wirrls - I .\... 'V.V..'" 1 i -1 se 'Wines atra wag - \ • \ s. i ...lawn. ... .. ... WOK, • LiVaat OterWar.Caiaaaa15 salvo. S.* Se. a-.---_.___ :::•••: \\:; ' :...-.1- • : , ,•• ,_— .1.1- ,._._ 11.46i. KW • 1144.04/ ------ \ i • ?AY'N t.,\,16 ._. - \ i - . 1.401.0.6 NW..soipessfels - -; . •\ ' \ /, 1 I i \ ;;L-3 r/ II : R.////////,:().,l:///,ii,/:/A1-.- '. ...I,., _ _ • \\ •, • '‹:. ••‘ 1 \•,....,...____M . 1 I --, V//////fl i I. . fsss Wet fa6 UsCPS.1 • - N.sss, I.V1 '9 In; i • . . - . .:.' . - •---• 1 •1 • I . ...._._ ,... \\ i I r'-.\—J" • • L..0-. . , .,., . t-i,.: 1-6.,t77:7 ; !--,-7,- ,f1 .. . . ._. \•i- ' -6' 1-' " • •.6\s•' '''''' '\ :r.-.. I --F;-%\ _ _ _._.____ . • i .. - ./ ',1-'//'/..". ' - • -- __ _ -, . , . ........._. . -,\,.. -,. •• . i i. - \ 0 / . -,- ‘,., •. , • • L.. "\' ' * 1 . 6 1-4...,-,m....-,- W9( (of•of s \ \ . s...... - . 1 -. - • \N' ..i, 1.,';, f7—_ . I,I"ir, , ...-••• _.. I'--.-- o • ••••••• ,Z I-•/ N: ......\ „‘ . .. • fr..tifja0911.,..4;ca•00.WE 1"S. ili.e-- ..! . . --.. .. • 1 ‘1., 1-) *'`... ',.. 4....4'. 4 .‘j ---•----2 •--- -----•411-1 ••• --:i ir------i * til' :4.,...-------_______-__. ____-_,_-'_&____,,„ • : -.._ .7.4.-4---. - - ._ --. •___,•_________4 '.,:- ___,-.-.,.._,..._._________. . _._.___._._ . . ,---7:-. - ,"• ..,---• -- --.. i. I -- ..... . . .. , .1 ,..., -- \ _ . I . - .' ,1:. •In, : . . - . • ...„... . •-•. . , - i ,j . . • . WATER, ' ',.•:"..(....". . e -• . si ..-. . ; • - • SANITARY& 11.7) '-' II''-, . STREET LIGHTING • .;,r ' . .„.. . . I guXr-i6..Rz\. . ,.._---- _&.bei•A. -. W--‘..----••::- . t - - .-- , -- I-' ' NO rA I ... • gfo fw gCU CN " - ATTACHMENT_ _. #24 " —...— . ................s..........- . . -• -. fl A�u % l VILLAGE "''�' - "� i •; ' PLACE - - % J''- _ _ • NORTH (1 : HE(CO 4hRK AND KILv ,% ''- i • . •fA.b r•�. /' i r d ,L-) i RF.NfON.WASHINGTON ``\ -T- I REATON VILLAGE ASSOCIATES .. ^7JND Y,:f4r115u1 t$�y Calhson way ;, ,��,� .� �., .. /j. 6(AtOR5 1 '; O MITA wWrotc _ - `, ' - -lam '• ,'a ////� r i. i Q ' —� . �'ft 111 CCC\•:t I IMJWGD • i. �'..:?:i a _,.-'.�±`•l • V. '_\\\���\\\\I •' y s :1- I 'b -� i _ Raaca aOw naJiws '� < 1NNf'(WA I • nTaen lMW ww+ " ---:a_ 1. ..r' tl - I « rocaroa Of NW m......�,-..,M a r o- - , l • - ` , / �`. I R6• Ifi(LbNCR idswGll¢c cvAu ,I i .\ i i i ///////•/i�/� i w 4 a' roi,r 'ettiM 9 4 ii o- ``; Srw�wsowwena, OM • i , l` _ r I li • ), •:_ 1 ,.. in. 1 _74• k §///7/ - { IO ,, \ \ \. � \`. PAY • + �e, .Hsi • ' , `lit \J /i� /: , • its ��b ____ 1• .e c \• \�`�.I\\1 `,\\ m`\\ti_�•- . . \ -� - •li'° ___. • 4 I f—�� Nam: 166 D77" .- / - c !p¢N WIFIMOJ VCLVWB WW LG ryWl[6p — --. .� COMD N A M15-'AIL•0KM FrIWPh 1PE EU A C- �:' r•i. I. -�� iG/ etemeMe etM13. �iQNM 040 UW 05540,'LD • • I`� - __., 7Q'Ib SWf RMi6 AhA 2-YGi¢SIAi+a W 91G ...pu 1,A_I _ hrfEMRLA'•st,TOM f01MY•a.+LaCYN6uf. 1:1 - / a __ j---ii;t ` ._ �� J T J s STORM r _1 "- —------I-___,. -- -=''= .F -ivd-'" +I' �o i DRAINAGE • —= �, ,' �-; PLAN . guER6REbtd I d. 1 Ou61V�NOD1 .Y,e5 —7_—....(445"l? } 6N61CAi/ UN>F'�e - 'i ATTACHMENT#25` . • , 1 ••••-_ I ' '.P -- . . , . Co I- . . , . Ill• 0. < I- F- < . . . • ir • . I il 1 . . tt . • • ti 11 ' 1 . il 1 • il 1 • : . 1 I 11 ' • I ; 1 )i I li I ' 1 Illrl ' 4 - 1: 14'4. q ill Ot ti 1 i ke• z '. ': Wil Id 1,..q,1„!,,,t, , , ,.........r.,............7.,„ ,,. ,., . , „,,..:......, .....„ . • .. .) . _. . ...„:„...,..-_,..=:::. r.,_trr,r,":'.1 .: .... • . '''4:•• -1,1.1 Iliik ;-.. ,...„,„..,..... ,_,....„. • \-6-.., ( . , ' -1.1,- "J : I .43.'03r•f.teiSErrtf 11 11\1 4 t a I RO A' 4 lit. • , ...... i.tik;41 1/4, ,1/4 ! Jo i'- ,,k. •'•••:A , , , ji. •••0.0-_,..).. - - .•. , ---------7,-., • • • 1 i ,.....,-,---fr, 1..k..,m, ,,1 ., 1 p '--•• ••••••.4.,., 71 i ...x.a.,-....,......-..--. (.• ' •. ; 1 p._,A.,_I_____-z. -.-\----- . —'N.. ` klez •I t, ' ••• -'4\tili.:":42'...",!-.. i:.'.:'7..': it2..,-7.. :77,-..•,:::,/-::::-L-- -711 -r;‘:;&---'.::-':.,._:E-:±ii!',..1.":1-_--.,,A!I,".V..71,-*"---1-:Te,'...:. ...-:..i.:.•.:y.t.7-7-- -it;tialsi::.•ii„.. 17 k!.. \ ____....____ . it._..,.. •••:•77-•;•1°,;1,7-,77-..7-7,._ :':- '' •-.1-7':-.-7-- -.\.:,=-..--i----..-•-. -.-, -----7• -7:474‘., 7..,•,--7- ,7-,..,:is-7_-1,...•-• \ •\•\k'4.4 \\•\4i; !Ii.st ‘11 1 ' i ) 41 Os '''' 1 ' --. - ..1 i ‘.. , . , „ -' Is, '.! 4 • :41 V.*:t',..k.^.\, -6 ''` ' 4,,',Vki3O°'InT ll'1 \ 111 ,,. -.•, '1.---.‘....,,,..,...i.. '' ••" h•••s''','",",..7...11kil'iil.'1,, : '. 11 - -.--T.-k•.'1----- • \'•: 4• „.X Iii''ii1:-.".41•• •"i•`''•1/4',,•,‘ ••,'.'..'..'.-a'a.,'•-a'e\d.\'‘.\'• ‘ %.• :1' 4 -r.• • :.• •r.'.'—•‘•_,•. ,..•,•-\......:-,•.:,:- ,..1. .\• 4'',•,••\),,iI i,',4,.bA.' .,:.1... •\•:•• 1., \./...... •Atk•' L.,: 114 ••. ,0% 1 1*. •,‘..• •'4:‘;';'4.':•:.;;;;;!.:.:-:-.-r-••••` •:','.2, ;.:',.....:• .,,i.....!..:1:•,,:.'..,:',,,,,T.:,'1,-,':... .,•:,............ 'i,1?%'.,1,.::•:_.. , ..'_. PL:it‘',',. ''' '\.:'''‘\\ It' a.- - ..'t:-''' ''''';- --- ":aiMET:=-:‘, -_-_!...N-::::-., --Z-L,Nr: — ------ic- ',:,;,0*,2' ', , ''.!4 , 6., t'••,:•-•„. - :i- "t>. - IV -, .= •==i&----;-i-. ----f---------`El .... -.24-- -.7 Oh- - - •-•;,/------ i ' t h. \'‘ 41! • .i • •. ' .;i: . -..;;•• 4'.'. ve''. --....--:-- -i:.i're.). -,.01,• ; k.1;i p5,4 1 11;:,- ;- ., -‹. l'' i ' . „1/44 \ 4, A - rsk t A._ Akill ,„ t,,,lt.1 . .qb • ,...11 .. \ N 4 • i 1 4q, ,• 1,,:7, •.. 0.,,,,.,.tv.1.;„,,,,.....111 ,1......../.1r. ,,iiz c...\\ ..... k\ I " • . ' lik %-iii ••••1 1"Ask 4 iii \ ),, •-,, .,.. • • ,i h. ttg 1, 1 ta.,- 0,1'4.4 1,..011 , . ,Hz.,, , . • .0. . 4 %I ‘, ; ,- ,4-'., ,- -,- "--', 1 , 'IV :. 1\1.." lik, •1 'tilk k . .. . \. •il\s's...•1111,1 0•:' \-...„. L.,... ' • :',•..1-.. . ,., ,, , h..,,,,, „ i . • •.‘ • \N.Itov_._ , k. 11 't ii---il Zi., dll `11. r • Is .• 1 si• 4-'..3 \ ; . .1 ,JAk ,, st ,sks i, 11 4, . I A\ q?it. is ,i.• t, 4 x ,'4i ...:‘. .\ ..it,.,.1' • , '2,1,2. . ,,,,w....,$s!'14....:. f.,‘ .;k,iti .1‘ li 4 ,, ..,•T., \ -- ..-,4.. N ,Ck:1 \ '-'-.Y1\ .•\.. , ''",: ,• '1);:-., ''',.** : yt . 1 It .'' - •-.•: .-fk ''• tk_k__L_Z 1, '; Ili\• -.‘1,' k .. tiltI ' '<i• \-• 'I - •,-- ''' • ./..., t 11 1 1•:' 10 tg kr as ,. ;• JP .. k• f0. C , os\ • •a. 1., •• t•••••' It k kit 4 / '''OPV','• •• 1,Z;f., • ( „, -0, 444 ki / aa ii ,5,1 :...,., \kl i ' • !IL. L. _/. _,:'•---- Itki li '' '..,if T 'N7. ••1 . .'*' ."it \'''-------4; N " 1: 1 ' •,, r. .:‘, N., .R'.--• ki t'55 ..k11 ' i,, lk r• ;i1R_.--..,..-- ;, 1, .., %.• .s•- A .1____1,1,-A1k ''' ••--f,, , ..ili '-'• • 4 •.. ...".. .:, 5 .1 1 " 1 4 1,5, , ,k am . , • 1 -, 4 • t ir. Ilk ,1 1: i 1\ \ • wialli,.., ,,'. AI— - ' , -------"A 4/1.11` 'II: ;kik 11. kit, • .,•01,, , :.J. • .1 t. • .. N,Iisl \ '\Vi.-- '. .li ''--7- 27" ....1•:::: -."-..,...; 71.-;.--;--------''' t 1r' ' .., a 1 :, • t ' 'N• ' ,-,41 ' • 'f... :•,. '",.„, • ., ,,. ...2" rhir 11. : l''''' 4.VI' V4ii- 'Ili ' • -,--,,,-,-:1,# -7,e-- ,s, .-,'v --'1- aft % ii ....a;,,•••=-17.r.r.-"r""'"1, ' f?' i .14 ;•,; -''-"*-- .,.,..... N..\ ...4 v •.r.''l r ' v^-, . ,, i:' .. k il ' ^ 'A, . '.,,' •r. Ci ;'[. tiq, k_ ••-•::::::f-_:".::'‘ '„. k•4Ki--1:--1• 5'' 11 10, 1 1111 '01i.!A \i i 11 11/4 . 11 %II k , Alb X• • - .).1t1 • , i ,,,, A 11. --, ,-)., ___ - 1,, i t \ \ 1.. - 1,:. .. ..f.;:a.!c7....-Iir....„„.. ., . ,„„ . lly ,-• ... • -t-,. .4. N.- • , -,•.' ...:- •--..-2;----7•7:- ----;-.l''•' -•-•k'-t- • iiq 1141 i 1110 i 11 .. '4\k...- ---- ., .• X ..6:\tkk r 1, .,.7,:;:..:.-..c_ss.f.--L-..-....:,-,ft... 0, 1/441 R,,,/: kgt, 441k10 •.1 • - L • ' " , '`A \''',..• ...",, . '1 '' .1LI'''''. 'ea \`\•1\',..A 0.1i -, i lil ot ) 4 ..s. .:-. :.• ..,. . . v, . ...,: „.. , ,-, --• •-„ 4‘ k4,..7. ‘545• . '. ';‘"tv•.s'-s;.. 1 5 ; ;;'1 1Z k • : *\' 1'\\ i ,,'‘,ks•-,T. - ,_i • - '1st> i • -• i, A. \ :...., • 1., 1,1, .. i ...._,.1, _ -,7". ............;-'.1.- • ' 4.r.,-.*•`e•-'..t.=-'''''-'2'-••• •.1F.T . r•-- .,- •it‘ -.7:_-.. .;7.-T- 1',kkl ITN% qlqi I ill, ‘-)n N.„, 0... 'i .._.....-k------- .'..-.L---,••• ___--- ,.......,..... -... ....', ... A.:I. •..• 'Ik104k" tiq i “1! tt ik I \ '. '‘ 1 ..,,,,,,,,•,.., ::•••-, .::,. ..7_,: ...1.:::-..: ,,.,.. .v's. .sf)', .,n,"..t• .4:1,ti\.,jci ,..,1 /.... ,h,I \---- . k\ ''''''' 1. '' 5' ,1 \ ' . '' " ' / 7 •1\1' '-'11 li..- / i 1 , L •‘' i • \, ..0110 ' 01m ___ l'4 1"1‘" linWi 1•'ki It V.:. \------ t\• ,.1, 1, ,, lig 41t 0 ,,Z. ;/-.• ' - - . • ‘,, `,4 .,i1 Iluil i k %'k • ':.'' \ - .,-,. •Iiii`ti—v ".. • . • I ..‘,. :., , •\‘‘(/•,•r! 5 1 11` ••••••• 4 t ,i, k•k\.?,\‘, ,i c• ip 1..‘ ..\ . h ,... • . 1 4 . -.i.r. 4 • • Avk ,.„ no . ,i,. ••ii -, - 0, .'•:. I • . '; .4 . 7,...... A. ; X:, ....r 0/4'\ A •. , 1 i, . ,. V•.••• 'OA' '\- ''• :t1--N••• ' 4 X i' f I° ./....-,,r_._...=,..z ...<. c`4 . ,,,f3 ..,.. '.41t , :41. i ,. • ,;41': • ,„_ , • :17-77..1?-7-1'."------ --:•:-..t777-7'-.- • 4.--) i • 3 -7- 7--el 1 k k 1 - ti.- -..:-.. '' ."5'-i-;.';';';'--'`"/...' - `'''':• .__•-,.-7.=,-..:v.. •• • 0.. . .f 4 • Ipl p i h. '.. %--r,r, ..„.....,,d,......„k ,.. ..• ,......„-,,, . , „1,.........„.., „:„._,,, • „ , ,,,, t, b,i ,, 4, ,,, ,. 1 ligy '.• • ,tt .. .1.IL'. s.', ---::------,-..;1,-!).•- ....-.; -71.'7•1•;-':-.:4'!.'' A v ''./ , \,,,1,1 rii,jil ool i• k 1 il 1, 0 5i' p ilkt 1 - ‘. ' „ V k;,k• 4 41 ; •--3.--'....•-.•'.., ' r ‘ ,'/,.(' ..„ ' ik fil te or 5 k' k 1 1 4VZ i 1 ,Uli ,, !..i..,:f•:.:• \I •‘ "..1/4.',.c.lk" 1 • • '$.1Z., ft •' ... . ...% 4.,,.•,k7%,,,,I5 '( b i,1 r1/4 k 1/4 14 ' k y 1 1 y b s 1•1 .3; . sl : ,.• v.; • i 00 44V 1q0 ik;: ,-.I., '•:•V ,`it..3 1,05 ki i '. ,.' /:Nk ' 111 ii),' I 'It;, 0 .,. --- ;,; i. •.11, 0,. , i. ,, ,, - ..., . ,1 31. • . s' . 4 si t i: •\i,.; IN WIsiN .0A'' OWO I. ‘ t 411ki ‘I lit ''''A • ttp l, " il ‘ 'WJW4i„tit Oki 0 kl fl11 1 1 , ,411 kg Itgl!'ki'l 1 .1.,i/ i, ' • --'' -- . kh tk AZ 1144 y‘ki t0111111i0c1 ‘ lil tl$, ' 't\/t•1 M lh•V /.1k 0q4 '' PI( \ • . ..._ . ........ . . . ..... • "'‘‘%11kPkWVe ‘ k.,, 0, 0 ‘'i• 1 .1k4:IN • • . • . . . . , .. . . . • • . . • • • • . . . - , • .-•••- . . . . ,• . — — VILLAGE . . • hIlki1UM . • ' '"T..; ... --- PLACE ....._ NORTH J -.!..•....r.::!"-"' 1.'-',!".---:::.7'-- n • • 4111111 -......v.1,---,::::,•".- • - , • wrill- . W.C.:, rA<.'S AN7-,•:°.- . ,., _ , . a .0-6-.::::,:::-_=- ..-.=.:17 .:77".. • • , ,. , 1 -Q......:-.It..-.W...i7.-•F.' RENTON VILLAGE ASSOCIATES . 1 . \\\ - i / ' l' C)-----.1-...syr.......-.-zr •:....t.:-.1,-..:..4" . . . . • • •AUP-12. .-- m......7:-F-..: . . . .-, -•• • - . • • -- •. _. • ; -t---2,..... Ca Ilison . . .. trild610 ti',1701:A.V.11 - ....-- ! . 60.12y koAy ...- , •••••-•-•.{ ....., . , . . • . 1,0--... ,...ro .q)1.51-15K1 :-.s,;-• l'--7,---2="--. z..---...,'— - • . " • ,--.• -- 6:-.._;:f ., • . , • . --..- . . • 4r, ,, •./1/ ' ..............- r.:"7:.";.:74" . Al -.. • "-..1...1.4::::.„... .2.::, , ..• .44.18,0 ft.•1 • •11.11e 41:7::::t..'L'7-:-..`':1'.7-,-. ' • .. •. •• . • ti.."7.7t2.'''. . • . /10.•-.... . 17: ‘:,.-..-;.„.% -.... ,.-. ' \\ • \,, 'Z.:Mr...2°V ' ..,.... ...-:."-..."7.-_-.... - -4."7...',...- .:,...4,-,-..:,- i'Z' .....r.r.4.. • * • -' * ->. ,:mxtmiaml30111.675, _ , \\ ......),. . .\ ; . -9.infnikst ..,:_-,,,...-- ...,-7,7% . :::::--- El'r.-- • - • . . • ._, - ,....---..,.r --.Area , , • I , '01-• .-.0,---- — 77.A"-- ::=-'-'1".."- .v 2:f.:ii:'1,?:••:... ---""'""-- - . - . . •• -11 1,-,,,I--.----- -,,...,-..4.7,-,, . _ . . .. ,... -•il...-..g.:-.... _._ __.._ • - . -, • -- 10-.,::..v • V.,t!! 1 r i ', ,. .., ga-Wr="7-A`AA'A'ALA L.7:1V2...q.:.7..L ''''''''''.-..-.-" . . .- . . . -! .. . ' .- - -• . . - ..f::;_-:: ;-t.,:-.;.-'-':-:.L-',...,'.•:.: - '_, .,.',.:„..:,'.-:-,-.i.: -.-: ,, -.#4, . ' i . via-•• =-- i---1 `.--- -..... 'E 7 Fc..:2---•— .z.-:::::,...::..7.- • • - - //....*41, 11 '; .4,.!, / .: i,::-,-:?....- It. (.7',-- --.•—•'''''------- :-...7:4:-:r.:.:.= 44'ft.- . - .. :. • - . .. • I i : I I, „ . ....... • . - . ... _ , •. - fc) I i I --.17._ • - P _oa 1 • . _ _cki • 1 : ! ; •47.141 : 11'. 1 --4.i oh r _ : . •0 Z...."...7- ,..a.e-i,..4 ;:ftwo , 1 1 _-,:i--•= ....J VILLAGE PLACE NORTH i is.-10, ET: E.T:r. . . .•. . . . — 1Irir7-..r.: =-,4,111 .....,,,.. -".."‘ - .• . RIONO GARAGE ' i .• , ......../ , . , . . , I 1 Meckl''',...-trAr ' • • • "-- ."'• ---. JI Q .....,••••••••,"•••.•••1, •• i. ,_._.,_.,_81 .4. • . . . • • , .."...'... . . ••:- - -. ,.-,--••• . 2 ' i---'s . , Aft' ,\ Ti7";f:H::::.;•rci:,:"..ral;.::::-. .. - :-:• -•' • ..0•."' ` t t7 6 ''• V 'f{4't -'1 • ',..... ; ;L::''' . , !(..„ ., -.2:... ....:,-..c., -_, __,.. - i, .. ,---.,___„ . ,.. , , FIT.:Fi.7.-F,15::::"L'a.F7::::i:...7--. - --- - - . . . . .. - • • ‘ J. I. . . ' 1- ,j-,..- 2,p! _- ,c ,,,.,,,,,• 'Siti \ .:::.!•VIP..; -'s,4 I ' ''. .../ L., i. ?••., ,. ----,b . , • • , . . iif,VA.; '' 1 ....a:--:- •> '''.- . ,---, ' "i?...7.--:=-ia-E.:,7,.ii.7:::::-'1H.i.:::::.--,-,:.. . ., • _______ AL,.. _;....,--, _ ., .,.._ • ,....-k___, \,2_-_...) ,..._....._,/\--/\,......„, j,s b§ ' 7.F.:::7.:"."-::::.1.:7::::.:::,:;:r.:.::=::" -- ------ -- - -----.- • . ' •. . -A4- ,,,,,„........ :1- 'AV',.;,-./ "- • - - .1.; i- "7-:•-•••:''''r:4!'- ' .....,roaret-R^ .' . A \ \V...e,,,s. / :- .. - n-- ,T'' • , ..+,---) ,. • ::14:::.,:-.:::::.1.!.7.-:::::::::::::'.....-'' . 1.......Aft- ,J. „'." a,74....,..,, •,1 - ..F.ii:F:Fzi:ii:ii:iliFi.'::.:ir2:1F.7-1-4' •---- ::::::::::::.:v.:=::-.z.....Z.7" •••-•,.•---- . • et.‘,..-:-.:;;:..":::',. '\.. '''•1'\//, ... , ,, ..........-..-..........--.-...,..... ....- . _ (-rt. „,i, ".f.f . • V./,,,„ _ _171. .------'\ . . " . .„-•... , .••KW•CAZ • '...:•i''''...-- . ' •':,,.. • A. . • -,‹7........,.-.7.......:_:- . ..n.....t.4.=,..,.,t....1...,L 1 .,::.. .r.::...p,„,.....;.r.,..,-,1 ., . .,e.t."-. c:-, r,i,-.-f--_;--V:Zr:;)r. i----Li ,:c4=i r ,;,,,,..,'..,717,:elt,=-7-• -,,,_ : , __ . _ • 2. r.....--, [.!,/,‘ -_ :,., ..,..-,. ..., ...-7 i (__ ---/ , ---,....;;;,t4T-,.......„ 14, --•!:,..,,...%,;: --,_ „,7k.,,,,,....,,.. • ,...‹,. __. -1. .;_-‘ -....,.....„-- . . - •• - •.-,.,- ..._ -"-"----. • ;.;,1 --- ----' LANDSCAPING ''";?"/-7:I'":"':.';..1:1'.• SITE PLAN . .• • . ''''-1-`,!:::::',..g..'41.`,..., • . . . .2-.04- I 28-11 . • .. 4.4igtcagP.A4 1 fAk SWOKI flika;,' 1 ... .. rt ....... .-.-.... . .. . A \ 14:164461%061EMA i . • ATTACHMENT#27 L-1 • '-'-'••••-•'•••"---"•- •-...-.. • _ . . . . :,........=.. ...m............a. .1j, . =.47.1.7"..' l•:r.":,..7 A,..= h ... ...0,....sr A. VILLAGE — .........- . t.., . J....S.OF 603E......L. • _-_-- - s•Adre.! lowpwolalz re., .2.1•161.ta•AM..% Am..co wove ,....„ — ............., PLACE _. ) ,.. ,--•------ 'P...... 1.- I .-..1,...... • NORTH ....._ .i.7 ...........7. .. _ , ....... ..._ . ......._ --, ,.... ......,. RENTON L1:12-AGE ASSOCIATES •..... ....1.....rev sea nem oar...VAC ••at....e rof cr•omaa.mie EVENINEEN PUNTA.DETAIL CTIP,cAt:) cr,NTACE PLANDND ocrut.-Wa....n(11/.....\. ) (7, .t.1.,.....=......: ,.../........, ki Cailison ,. • ........... ...,.._, . ..-..., . i 7X4. ,,---. AI', /.-."-- .— ----- -. ---- ------: . ! / _..,. ....,, _ — ,...c .."........11,- • . . • i-- 5r.i'l ....,..\,.... ,..-.Ar...rroto,,,00l. • :. • ' . . • , .•• ..2.1' . • • . I...7:1...... ........,,,, ,..,,...,_ :....."::-.... i.....,'T , /5,PLANT SPACING DETAIL(--,....‘ ri,Mu N.Afrnma CCM-(.••PC.,,\: L.2. .,... t..I.L.t"..'7. ).,-.' • ' ,,:2.,--cc... . • _• i - ____...___ ,c. • .......,..—. . • _. "....1 t‘ . . . .• t ' / •Cf.: - ,-- .. ..: • •._..... 7.1.1.1.- ) ...,..., ........,..,\ . . fir.• NA -__, ,• . .,4*••••••.,i •••!.....,..., • ''''''' . :::.=,`"'"'''' v. ••',- :::11:' 7.-f,r-cd--.Th• C.',..Z.1:::,c•<., '2.•_-?..- • L'.. , . t;',:t.- `,:,it '. ' , ._.. raltt_ii____...0.,..4 ..r,..4...„..,...z. ,...,••, .p.,...• ,,,...,,,,,,,. ,.,,. „I , (•,-, ,:„,..,' A•ef...!: • ..:!: •-..•'• , '-.4.i I-'41.•:'./ . ...,„ „i,i • , • , "7"). PLAZA SECTION ,..... _ _... . •'a...4i t.., ........0,1°,2.., • . :.-13':::541::: • .............mm.... PLANTING ISLAND SECTION , • • _. . . .4../1, - • --— _:,_.....„...—, ... • , _...—- .4,4;6. : W.."'"!"-*',...-.• . €. , ."''., '',. . .....,...r. 4 ... . ... ... s. ; . ,,,.,.. . .., . .- -+ ..... -.... ., . .....,......:. ."-_—_____ -i- .....- ) ) ' i-.....1:7: . ,,.. _t___, VAsse Place North rick,Itut ....,:.....z..kie.:',..: i . 1 I i......,..............7._:__;•• • • Al ..................... ‘...-.- r:cl. I --ar---' . 1 . • ...414,,,,Ir,, . . - /;.71.....1 .I-1 "-r1-''''.:` .-14.•i''''Cr \-":.'7....,t; ! 1 ..__L_ , • i • .____ .. • '! -. i . i-Et-• c..;"•/-....,1--:-jr.r•-1:: !___.: . ' I --....7r,...NI.. 4—I—..,—.... ..N..„....••,'1•,...e..EC•.", . ' 1,. ! ,,,i_i_ I , I %V.', . : . ! 0.•MG.• ,• , ,co,. r, aP• , ....‘.i ,..f.,,,,RT---.-1 `.. —.-••••..:•Ver.... „. _1,22 1 - ,e, :LA:,,I,T,ItNG SECTION AT STREET R.O.W. . o : .• 17""-- -'114:-.:JI/F-MgrO I .4:::'-'-'.7V" s 77P.-WA ' 1 -#:-.•-0 ."1-Tgu""*"-'4 -Z,'.'. .=.--,.. • ...•,-.....) -.7.,— z—k . . • _.,__. ,.....7A.,-..,...• ...,,....,-..,..,...Gr..•,.....D.,,S '-'" 1-r--5;;:-.::r7:::..17-7-,'. s•'‘',!,-...."-W:L '.' ''.."' , ,, ,401, I.:..1:1.11.1I ' ''''P.I',.: ;LI_''''' ,.'-',”::::::-.• • li , , ---11r. , ,,„„,,.,..., \2...:, . ,.. . . . • triE *M;*-- "14;.`-, ., i ..,,,,--. '' .,/ :7....* J!i7C.72t ----1'• I •.r.,.1 . ...m. -.0 .4 .,.- .;.- n . ....„. ,...,''''' , 1. • , 1 :. LANDSCAPING -•6,1, DETAILS - :,:i.: ..._ • ::......,...;•••:411-" , ....,...,...:".= ..,..%,Yr........., \A:.41.J.:7;Ile A r,/1.. IN.' .••A Eff.a.... t. t _•. ' 1'.. ' .0 .... “ '''. .4- ..••-• -.....17.:.A....1Q.., .... eas s-.0...1 -• , •..t 44.da ..... . _ ___ ...___ .1), i....77:::T.,"r.L.41:,.2',..e..i;.••,. .; -t'LL...1,.11:-.•,VI t• - -.V.,37___X-WE...---- -''11 •-11.7)Vi,L.'4. ' re-1= --- ,-'.!-7.1.i ,-,..BUILDING PLAZA PLAN ...;.; TN.4::,i. tt•Z..-r...,••••, `• --,•.--.;,:r.....--,...% -....°--e.r•Z•f- ,a.........- Gort ,...e.1.1n.A. ,7s, ROOF PLANTING DETAIL__ _r_FIL,TYPICAI,PLANTING SECTION _. ...too 1-i ••• •• =ta . • "3.r. ..'•.' ATTACHMENT#28 L-2 '.'f/' -.....--- - %• CITN iF RENTON • � y Planning/Building/Public Works Department Earl Clymer, Mayor Lynn Guttman,Administrator IFCC°\1� % 1991 nvi February 26, 1991 5 ". e— s-IN O Loren Laskow HEpft114G Renton Village Associates 15 S Grady Way, #509 Renton, WA 98055 SUBJECT: Village Place North CU;ECF;SA;V-078-90 Dear Mr. Laskow: This is to inform you that the draft Hold Harmless Agreement submitted by Lonny Townsend on January 25, 1991, has been approved by our City Attorney. Following issuance of the Hearing Examiner's report for this project, you may proceed with preparation of the final document for signature and recording. Please contact me, at 235-2550, if you have any questions. Sincerely, AL„,„„) Lenora Blauman Project Manager 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 • It'W %o 4 CIT' OF RENTON ,.a Office of the City Attorney Earl Clymer, Mayor Lawrence J. Warren January 28 , 1991 PLANNING DIVISION Lonny E. Townsend, Esq. fJ9`►Y OF RENTON Attorney at Law Davis Wright Tremaine JAN 3 01991 2600 Century Square � � �� 1501 Fourth Avenue ED Seattle,_ Washington 98101-1688 Re: Village Place North Application No. CU;SA V-078-90 Dear Mr. Townsend: Pursuant to your letter of January 25, 1991 I have reviewed the draft Hold Harmless Agreement by Renton Village Associates in favor of the City of .Renton and it fulfills the requirements of Paragraph 10 of the revised mitigation measures dated. December 21, 1990 . Ve ruly yours , awl Lawrence J. Warren LJW:as . cc: Mayor Clymer Don Erickson ! � A8 . 65 : 06 . 0} oc \re 1991 o 1400 • Post Office Box 626 - 100 S 2nd Street-Renton, Washington 98057- (206) 255-8678 DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LAW OFFICES 2600 CENTURY SQUARE ' 150I FOURTH AVENUE ' SEATTLE,WASHINGTON 98101-1688 (206) 622-3150 c\\11 LONNY E. TOWNSEND J 1` 1 diilll (206) 628-7783 ` J AIDS 1gg1 January 25, 1991 _. __ Lawrence J. Warren, Esq. ' E.N Warren, Kellogg, Barber, `- ,> Dean & Fontes, P.S. 100 South Second Street F f-g 281991 P.O. Box 626 ®�, cif. O Renton, WA 98057 �'� weft velkilING EXA Re: Village Place North Application No. CU; SA V-078-90 Dear Larry: Enclosed herewith is a draft Hold Harmless Agreement by Renton Village Associates in favor of the City of Renton. The enclosed agreement is intended to fulfill the requirements of Paragraph 10 of the revised mitigation measures dated December 21, 1990. Please review the enclosed agreement and call me with your comments. Very truly yours, DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE Lonny E. Townsend 30285-1 LET:sjp Enclosure cc: Loren Lasko ) Thomas A. Goeltz, Esq. 2. L . TOWNL\01182.D20 Seattle FAX: (206) 628-7040 • TELEX: 328919 DWJ SEA ANCHORAGE, ALASKA ' BELLEVUE, WASHINGTON ' LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA PORTLAND, OREGON • RICHLAND,WASHINGTON ' WASHINGTON, D.C. HOLD HARMLESS AGREEMENT THIS HOLD HARMLESS AGREEMENT is made this day of , 1991 by RENTON VILLAGE ASSOCIATES ("Renton Village"), a Washington general partnership, in favor of the CITY OF RENTON, a Washington municipal corporation ("City"). 1. Acknowledgment of Flood Plain. Renton Village hereby acknowledges that City has informed Renton Village that the property legally described on Exhibit A attached hereto ("Property") is located in an area that may be included in a 100-year flood plain as of the date of this Agreement. Notwithstanding this information, Renton Village has decided to proceed with development of the Property. 2. Hold Harmless. Renton Village hereby releases and agrees to indemnify and hold City harmless from any damage to the Property, or to property, improvements or persons located on the Property, and from any liability, suit, action, judgment or claim arising from any flooding of the Property resulting from conditions of the Property and surrounding area existing as of the date of this Agreement or resulting from Renton Village's work on the Property pursuant to Site Plan No. CU; SA; V-078-90 and any building permit(s) related thereto. Dated as of the date first above written. RENTON VILLAGE ASSOCIATES, a Washington general partnership By Its TOW N L\01160.AG M/1.25.91 Seattle EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION TO W N L\01160.AG M/1.25.91 Seattle • I•• �',,•••Z.T.Y..:;.L1'�N.0 F..•.• I2EN.T N O : RF2 L •�N��•�•T r.2 LINO:.:.;: ;.;.:.;•::::::::::;•:::. .;.: • On the 51--b day of 10 , 19 q1 , I deposited in the mails of' t e Un ' t d State Statesi a sealed envelope containing 4.e, 4Ffor, documents . This information was .sent to: • Name Representing • rear\ G`oe �� Call tsar) A'acitrte...tsirti Loren L skc u.) \,‘ ' • • • (Signature of Sender) • Subscribed and sworn to me this 0 day of 19 5/ , „te"no®® etkREr 4. �•` 4... ossioy :„.. , -10 • • NorAR�m;� Not Publ c in and for the m : ue v �o Sta of Was ington residing P �y� , Clo at 421 .�• 4Z' 99 •' �� ao therein. .; • : c " C►tit., PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF RENTON FEB Q 41991 REFLECTIVE GLARE STUDY VILLAGE PLACE NORTH RENTON, WASHINGTON Prepared for The Callison Partnership Prepared by CH2M HILL 777 108th Avenue NE Bellevue, Washington 98009 January 1990 REFLECTIVE GLARE STUDY - VILLAGE PLACE NORTH EXISTING CONDITIONS The site is currently occupied by a parking lot and small one story bank. The only existing sources of glare are the bank building windows and vehicle windshields. IMPACTS OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT METHODOLOGY The methodology for evaluating glare impacts that is used in this analysis is described in the City of Seattle Light and Glare Study. Phases I and II, (Department of Community Development, 1980). Smooth specular surfaces, such as glass, reflect the sun's rays in a parallel fashion, producing a reflection called spot glare. Visual discomfort may occur when spot glare from a building's surface enters an observer's cone of vision. A motorist's vertical cone of vision is considered to be a field from 30 degrees above the viewer's line of sight to 45 degrees below his or her line of sight. A motorist's horizontal cone of vision'depends on the speed of travel. For example, at 45 to 55 mph a motorist's horizontal cone of vision is estimated to be 30 degrees to each side. At 25 mph it is estimated to be 50 degrees to each side'(The Freeway and the City, USDOT, 1968). It is assumed that glare outside the cone of vision will not interfere with a person's vision, and that the observer may avert his or her eyes from the source of the glare. Because of the sun's annual path over the Seattle area, and the limits of an observer's cone of vision, visual discomfort from spot glare is a potential impact at sunset, sunrise, and during the daylight hours of winter when the sun's altitude is less than 30 degrees above the horizon. The times when the sun is 30 degrees or less above the horizon at Renton's latitude are shown in Table 1 for days representative of the sun's position throughout the year. Table 1 . Times During which Solar Altitude is 30 Degrees or Less March/September 21 June 21 December 21 Sunrise to 9 a.m./3 p.m. to Sunrise to 7 a.m./5 p.m. to Sunrise to Sunset sunset sunset 3 The sun's altitude also affects the intensity of the sunlight and therefore the intensity of the reflected glare. The sun has its lowest intensity when it is low on the horizon (i.e., sunrise and sunset), since its rays are filtered and scattered through the earth's atmosphere to the maximum extent at this time. The City of Seattle study recommends that glare impacts be analyzed with respect to major roadways, public spaces, and residential areas for the hours when the altitude of the sun is less than 30 degrees. Major roadways are defined as arterials having at least 20,000 average " weekday daily. trips (AWDT) or a posted speed limit of at least 40 mph (Light and Glare Study, pages 23 and 24). Roadways in the project vicinity that meet these criteria are S. Grady Way, SR 167, SR 515 (Talbot Road), and Interstate 405. Each of these roads have above 20,000 AWDT and 35 mph speed limits, except Interstate 405, which has a speed limit between 45 and 55 mph near the project site. There are no public open spaces or residential areas in the immediate site vicinity. ANALYSIS The proposed action will construct a ten-story building and five-story parking garage. The exterior of the garage would be entirely of non--reflective materials such as concrete. The exterior materials on the ten-story building will consist of approximately 60 percent reflective vision glass and 40 percent concrete, tile and other non-reflective surfaces. The specific type of vision glass has not been decided on at this time, but would have a reflectance of between 13 and 20 percent. In general, reflective glass reflects between approximately 8 and 44 percent of the visible light. Clear double-pane glass has a daylight reflectance factor of • approximately 14 to 15 percent. The design of the ten-story building's exterior facades consists primarily of alternating bands of glass and concrete. This mixture of reflective glass and nonreflective material serves to break up potential glare bands and prevents the creation of uninterrupted walls of glare. Also, proposed landscaping around the building will help to screen glare from motorists and pedestrians. Figures 1 through 6 illustrate the general pattern of reflected sunlight anticipated to be generated from the proposed project on the four representative days of the year when the sun's altitude is 30 degrees or lower. The analysis assumes a 132-foot tall building. The glare bands in the diagrams also assume that the entire building facade is reflective and do not represent the nonreflective portions of the building exterior. The diagrams show the outline of the potential area that would receive reflected glare from the building at specific times of the day. The area within each band where reflected glare is visible and unblocked by existing buildings and topography is shaded. Only the effects of the buildings shown on the figures are considered in terms of blocking reflected glare form the proposal. It should be noted that the diagrams show reflected glare at static moments in time. In reality the glare is moving between the positions shown in the diagrams. 4 June 21 Pacific Daylight Time (PDT) Figures 1 and 2 illustrate glare bands from the proposed project on June 21st in the morning and evening. During the morning peak traffic hour, glare from the proposal would cross S Grady Way and could affect eastbound motorists. Reflected glare would move within the motorists cone of vision at about 6 a.m. and move off the road and out of the cone of vision at about 8 a.m. Moving at the 35 mph speed limit, a motorist would move through the 7 a.m. glare band in approximately 1 second. This impact could occur from April to September with the greatest impact on June 21 as shown in Figure 1. Deciduous street trees are proposed as part of the project along S Grady Way that would be in full foliage at the time of the potential impact. The location of the proposed landscaping is such that it should screen much of the glare from the proposal that could impact motorists. Glare would begin to move into the cone of vison of westbound motorists along S Grady Way at approximately 8:30 p.m. and last until about 8:45 p.m. when the sun moves behind the hills to the northeast in the Skyway area. It would take about 10 seconds for westbound motorists to pass through the glare band occurring at 8:30 p.m., however, the impact,occurs just before sunset and the intensity of the reflected light would be decreased as a result. Here again, proposed street trees would screen much of this glare. This glare impact could occur during the two weeks before and after June 21 March 21 Pacific Standard Time (PST) and September 21 Pacific Daylight Time (PDT) Figures 3 and 4 illustrate glare bands from the proposed project on March and September 21st in the morning and evening. As shown, there would be no glare impacts in the morning at this time of year. In the late afternoon, between 3 p.m. and 4 p.m. (4 p.m. to 5 p.m. PDT), reflected glare from the proposal would begin to move into the cone of vision of eastbound motorists on S Grady Way. The glare would become more directly in a motorist's vision as the afternoon progresses until the sun sets a 6 p.m. (7 p.m. PDT). Figure 4 indicates that the proposed 5-story parking garage would block much of the glare from reaching S Grady Way. During the 5 p.m. (6 p.m. PDT) peak traffic hour, when the glare is well within the motorists cone of vision (25 degrees to the right), the parking garage would block 80 percent of the glare band reaching S.Grady Way. An eastbound motorist would move through the unscreened 5 p.m. glare band in 2 seconds. Impacts along S Grady way in the evening could potentially occur for about two months in the spring and fall. Existing evergreen trees along the south side of S Grady Way will partially screen glare from eastbound motorists. December 21 Pacific Standard Time (PST) During the winter the sun is at the lowest altitude above the horizon and consequently can generate very long glare bands. Figures 5 and 6 illustrate glare bands from the proposed project on December 21st throughout the day. In the early morning, until about 8:30 a.m., the sun is blocked by the hills southeast of Interstate 405 and SR 515. From 8:30 a.m. until 10 a.m., glare from the proposal would cross S Grady Way and,be within the cone of vision of 5 westbound motorists. The reflected glare would be less than 20 degrees to the left of westbound motorists at 8:30 a.m. and move further to their left later in the morning. At 8:30, it would take a westbound motorist travelling at the speed limit 10 seconds to move through the glare band. Reflected glare from the proposal could potentially be visible within westbound motorist's cone of vision in the morning for approximately two months before and after December 21. The greatest potential impact would occur at 8:30 a.m. on December 21, as described. Deciduous street trees proposed along S Grady Way would not have leaves during this time and would not screen the glare. • There is also the potential that eastbound traffic on Interstate 405 could experience glare from the proposal between 8 a.m. until just after 8:30 a.m. The 6-story Evergreen Building would block this glare until about 8:30, at which time the glare would be outside a motorist's cone of vision. After noon, glare from the proposal could reach S Grady Way, Interstate 405, and SR 515. In each case, the glare would either be screened by existing buildings, the proposed parking garage, or topography; or it would be outside the motorist's cone of vision. Summary Reflected glare from the proposal could potentially impact eastbound and westbound motorists on S Grady Way at various times of the year. With one exception,. potential glare impacts would be of short duration, partially or fully screened by existing or proposed landscaping, or just prior to sunset when the sun's intensity is greatly reduced. The exception is during the morning in late fall and winter when glare would be within the cone of vision of eastbound motorists on S Grady Way for up to 10 seconds. This and the other impacts would be reduced by the building facade design (60 percent glass which alternates with nonreflecetive horizontal concrete banding) and the low reflectivity of the glass (13 to 20 percent). The most significant impact occurs during the four month period roughly from November through the end of February. Climatic conditions during the winter months limit the number of occasions when glare can occur because of the limited number of sunny days. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration climatological data from Seatac Airport indicate that 1 during daylight hours, 84 percent of the sky is covered with clouds, on average, during this four month period (Local Climatological Data: Annual Summary with Comparative Data, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. 1987). As a result of these climatic conditions, glare impacts in the winter would be less than indicated by this analysis. MITIGATION MEASURES There are several mitigation measures that could reduce glare impacts. As mentioned, the proposal already incorporates some of the mitigation measures available. These are: a facade design alternating reflective glass with nonreflective concrete, a reduced glass surface area of 6 60 percent on the exterior facades, and glass with a low reflectance factor of 13 to 20 percent. Additional mitigation measures that could be added to the project include changing the building orientation or the angles at which the individual glass panels are installed, providing shading devices, or providing landscaping to screen glare from impact areas. Additional measures to mitigate glare during the morning in late fall and winter vary in their degree of practicality and appropriateness to the significance of this impact. The two most practical measures would be to provide evergreen trees along S Grady Way and/or use glass with a very low reflectance factor (i.e. 13 to 15 percent) on the building's east facade. Adding shading devices would be effective but could be expensive to install. Similarly, changing the orientation of the glass or the orientation of the east facade would also be effective. In order to be effective, however, the windows or entire facade would need to be angled approximately 30 degrees to the south. This could result in a loss of interior floor space if the windows are angled and would require a redesign of the project if the entire facade is changed. 7 .L.Q =wb.9 '/r rr t-wwr Q` � r .3/Y10137/ (7 '% d i H.LaON.371/7d 39VerNA it - ,a2z- o S32b1S-1H9/311 V/Y/Q'ling - e y\k__, II II 11 ► ul 1 S His/ in y 1. 11‘II k k _________} . . a U U Ryi H1 55 NJ LA OCI),<---u MI ——-' CD i % -7.i 3 ,-;:i' /I�.LN3al 5' t© Liboq � b. ,.. ; 5, i(s) I. t . - , - tip o %Pt. ; .4 D ( s i_ © dM. � � ''qpu,. • / . L / 1 f 1f 1 f if—'..__lf-7 I 2 / r1 r • J / ( S. 7771 ST� V ,-. . \.) . KA .... .J y. Y ,, ,NAY ' .,✓' . o :_. 4I J 0 1• i Q , . %it ' Q �}. ctic 'ig 'yam r.ryt•' �!•~ �� 1111111K5 �' -, 1%, '.fs yo • Q )i. F,r ©,1• ' i . 11---71- (1) S RF�VTON/ V/LLAGE YL l';‘7. . p f C71)• /77 \ h i1i I` 1 l --1I /577 'FIST il ,8 - BUILD/NG HFJGHT-STOR/E o 1ALLAGE PL.AL.E. NORTH PRG3055C) Zs OFF/GE TOWER. • F t Z Ju.K.c ..z/, 6,0.,, — 8/0 n, ) -/ _____________I I I 77/ SI_IL____I L--J t-1 L.../ S.2 . ilt\ / , ,...- T \ . • �Y SAY 6 1 - 47[4';4:f ,kWt.„ir:, ItiK r.71 ..,,*-:1 .7.:- CD 1 a".` �Q� + ' ,O I ©,3 i __ --5 RFNrG3V V/L1,46F PL. in.V i 0 LW vi�-j W --1;-Th -- ---- -- --- 4 tii l‘: W W / 7 F \ Q 5 . /57H __ _ sr a / -- / C ----` 7----__--� r—__.. ._1 I i t 8 - BOLD/N6 HEJGNT- 5TG412/E5 ' •- VV.AGE PLAN NOKTH P O O OFF/GE TO 5R. -A 3 /aru... : f mach-2i SPCJ '4z",-. / lam - 94hn Pat;34 c Srevho/aizai?r • ?'_/7zv7 r,P,4Z_ cads - ca v'.2 . 1,.norh!cz /, f,- "PIA • ' 7./11OL 37/d 7 ti•:C H13ON 37Y7d 39t77IA - • o s-7ranss-_u 9/311 9N/Q lIngl - B \-.. \\ ( J IL\ 1 1 1 L_______I 1 Ieit '[ . • a r ____.--,-- iS;121 a__/„.___________---------------------al (DD �- = id-a96.7WA AtilA9a'S- _.. . _ ° r© .,%$ 1.4 ohs wdk 4d es I © ---ate.'-;'' . - -' I �C5) . 111Z1\..° ' \luy 11 t—ir , r— r �r 1 1 2 / r • J / ( I L .� „�,J L. —1 L-1 L_I L/ -7 v 660.1 'na ah\ .parry . gam iii ./.7 1-' z s. AY ' - i o a I , �f'yv r'a:= © Talk p.4. Q • �1�1�1 •yk � j ,i�`l�Ir �1� t`�:. ,' ,f`r}�'�, I r' ;'Fd:dl'jF �' CD • [ mow ©.� ill 2 REA/TG>V VIZZA6E PL -i •-✓ '; 11am o ••ior O lOen, h �' 405 A Lti 1 sr Sam ��3Da ttl ' �' wS v1 11` W / .......__} "IS. /�• 1 , 1 . 5 /57:1I Fr---1 I Sr \ -.\, r\ g - BUILD/NG HFJGHr-5TDR/E5 o - VIL LA6e PLACE NORTH PR %Zy OFF/GE TOWFR . 21/2.2 ,5' 1`?C:Cd-i-rti(Xi, 1 8 ate, - /l a ill ,e- = h / 77 • ¢Pin ' ..... / C.___._ I L _ I 7Tt/ I_ L_1 L—J L._/ ST ;4V,i 3PM . ,;, rl • `•,.i\ �Lt '., /. ,IIIIII\ .aye .... a 'r .� s+.Uzi,q- .t irWAY .) FADY ,a r;ka i • ••. ate tiCthrt r _ 0 q - , a . \ i.\'',74kT emmanik ©) �c.w'Tsti 1.i=FXrOVV/LG46E rt. -; .../i • •, i/Iffil 4 N4 , ik li \,,,.� PM A •I _.(--------(:).-N (--71)1 -%--1------ ibgff' Ni • Lu ku k g --1 1 �l C--`1 1/5771 ST r\ ® - 81.1/1..D/NG NEl6HT-STQ. //BS . o •241 ' ;...it - VILLAGE PLACE HOKTH PRG1�=� S. %1' OFF/GE TOWER. , Fleva u 4e4.2J j .t/oon— ¢ioh, Mc374c Srus eet45(T;1*.e l 1._-_.11 11.--1' 1-1 i Li 5 777/ ST. ,: -,i .401r 0-laT-.AIT scR ,etc? = AIiiN \ . ..400djir..ly Mr gx-reivr-0 5e.yeee.kov4. )t /.2/TWF- S '-!�� 0 „toe. .___,PROPaSeDdolofilst O 5TZ.r Tgea5 .aider O prAnwor Orrigh, 4._ .1 . , *.• VV•.... R • „AL, ,�.►. CIS -: •..J -7')/eortsp.v low . 4bel 2 P/ : f: -6 JV ,JuAX. zip g;3D pM(:Dr) CaHlison . • _ • To: /01St14,144W Date: Pro ect NZ' — Transmittal --_ - ❑ Memorandum Re: 14- LI/04771. - *, GUI !/ "078 'Ro We are sending you XAttached C Under separate cover C the following: ❑Prints C Originals C • 0 Submittal C Samples 7For your: ❑ Information and use Xteview and comment E As requested • Action required: C'As indicated ❑ No action required !For signature and return kk,0400/ 1P-r --e3c) 23-x --/-cA 1-3 I-V • • ul fY OF RENTON IRECEVE® FEB 0 1 1Ni • r 8y r If enclosures are not as noted kindly notify us at once. 0 Corporate Headquarters: 0 California Office: The Callison Partnership Ltd. Architecture 1420 Fifth Avenue 950 Sixth Avenue A Corporation Programming Suite 2400 Suite 200 Planning Seattle,Washington San Diego,California Interior Design 98101 92101 Graphics (206)623-4646 (619)232-3233 FAX:206-623-4625 FAX:519-232-3337 David P.Lindsey,Architect . .i_ • -FEE' 01 '91 13:42 CALLISON PARTNERSHIP 206-6234625 P.1/4 Callison PLANNING olv, Cf l N y OF REN,I,ON FEB s�1. 1991 h6CiiiVE Date; 20/# ? A-414-4011/ Time Facsimile To: /�0' .. ..-' 2 "- 2673 Cover Sheet From: ;Pj/�,4 . Ei� fzific --/Vor..„7-he Gfet4/ c1 V-07 , 20 Number of Pages; ( (Including a Cover Sheet) • Remarks:( ') Or freerkre0 ... . .t/ / . �.,.„ . cakenif • 4 Corporate Headquarters: ❑ California Offiea: The Callison Partnership,Ltd. Architecture ; 1420 Fifth Avenue 950 Sixth Avenue A Corporation Programming Suite 2400 Suite 200 Planning Seattle,Washington San Diego,California Interior Design 98101 92101 Graphics 206 623-4646 (619)232-3233 FAX 206-623-4625 FAX 619-232.3337 David P.Lindsay ALA FEB J1 ' 4'� LHLLlbUN F'HN I NLf bH1H eub-bed4be °MIR Engineers PLANNING DIVISION IMO Planners CITY OF RENTON CNIII Economists 11111111111111 Scientists FEB 1. 1991 a-CEiVED January 31, 1991 SEA31419.A1 Mr. Brian Cloepfil The Callison Partnership 1420 Fifth Avenue, Suite 2400 Seattle, WA 98101 • • Subject: Village Place North Glare Study Dear Brian: I talked with Don Erickson at the City of Renton on Thursday, January 31, At his request, I have prepared a more detailed glare diagram (enclosed) that shows the worst case impact on June 21, This impact occurs at 8:30 p.m,, Pacific Daylight Time. The glare diagram considers the alternating reflective and nonreflective materials proposed for the north building facade. This results in the broken-up pattern of glare shown, The diagram also shows a dashed line indicating the extent of screening that could reasonably be expected from the Red Maple street trees proposed along S. Grady Way. At planting, the trees would be 2-inch caliper, or about 12 feet tall (American Standard For Nursery Stock, AAN, 1980). Although Red Maples can reach 40 to 100 feet tall at maturity (New Western Garden Book, Sunset, 1981), 30 to 40 foot tall trees can reasonably be expected as street trees. A westbound motorist travelling at the 35 m.p.h. speed limit would pass through each area of glare in 2 seconds. Between four and five areas of glare would be sequentially experienced by a westbound motorist at 8:30 p.m. The 12-foot tall trees would not provide screening of this impact. Thirty-foot tall trees would screen most of two of the glare areas affecting westbound motorists. As mentioned, the diagram shows the worst case impact. The more detailed analysis indicates that on June 21, this glare impact would begin to occur approximately twenty minutes beginning at 8:20 p.m., when the glare would move into the cone of vision of westbound motorists, and would stop at 8:40 p.m. when the sun begins to CH2M HILL Seattle Office 777 108th Avenue,N.E.,Bellevue,Washington 206.453.5000 P.D.Box 91500,Bellevue, Washington 98009-2050 r4 FEB 01 '91 13:43 CALLISON PARTNERSHIP 3�6-6E346E5 r. Mr. Brian Cloepfil Page 2 January 11, 1991 SEA31419.A1 move behind the hill to the northwest in the Skyway area. A similar but decreased impact could occur for approximately two to three weeks before and after June 21. If you have any questions or would like my participation in presenting the information to Don Erickson, please let me know. Sincerely, CH2M HILL James D. Irish Project Manager Enclosure - I-Lb U1 ' i is :4S CRLLISON PARTNERSHIP -O5-5234525 P.4/4 ..- — il. ./k$ 'X t 4_ ...., p , it, ,4 '..1 , N ,F.4‘„ 1..-7, ts:,,, :!S \ ,..,,5t e"."<7<7 . ..,777."-----....----------- ---------""—. it c,47 III ] . \ C.22‘..1 j 111 j,v,..).: 1.. !v, kt'NFL;\� r„1 u;:, \., • vl ,,,N, im cf.- , ,,„.. is, • ,..,. I""4, 1`,. R . ..,.....lvicp-A.v..,. . I I 1p I a?..414.7 ' .\. @ • _ , I ! i'-`M . ENTON Callison 1 V En FEB 0 1 1991 Lit To: Date: / ' ' DINE- .a {VISION ,� 193;447," Project No: . -, _..._- .. .a _e�___ , c>7./.ti,__ , , Transmittal v' + t ❑ Memorandum Re: / r iCP e i , G1) V ' d /g — 7c We are sending you IZCAttached 0 Under separate cover 0 the following: Rrints rQiciginals ❑ 0 Submittal 0 Samples ❑ For your: 0 Information and use ❑Review and comment requested Action required: 0 As indicated 0 No action required 0 For signature and return k . _. u 6.. m, 4 .-.. — aexie,0,7,17, px/4.7 , _ / • .... ,c t c 2 4-/ e.... L/ f 5 ' By M` If enclosures are not as noted kindly notify us at once. 0 Corporate Headquarters: ❑ California Office: The Callison Partnership Ltd. Architecture 1420 Fifth Avenue 950 Sixth Avenue A Corporation Programming Suite 2400 Suite 200 Planning Seattle,Washington San Diego,California Interior Design 98101 92101 Graphics (206)623-4646 (619)232-3233 FAX:206-623-4625 FAX:619-232-3337 David P.Lindsey,Architect • • CONSTRUCTION mmaggrem. LIGATION PLAN PROJECT: Village Place North PROPONENT: Renton Village Associates ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST': ECF-078-90 APPLICATION NUMBER: CU; SA; V-078-90 CONSERMFAMTSECUENCR Submitted with this written narrative is a construction , • mobilization drawing sheet M=1. This drawing shows the physical relationships of the various elements discussed in this mitigation plan. • The project will be constructed in three phases:, PHASE I - The first phase will include the construction of the extension to. South. Renton Village Place including the related utilities, curbs, sidewalks, signage and signalization. This road will proyide access for the follawing construction phases and will minimize the traffic impact on existing • operations. Phase I will require approximately 10 weeks of construction time. • PHASE II - Phase II will include the construction of the new office building and parking garage. The two structures will be built concurrently and will require approximately 60 weeks to complete. The parking garage will be completed and operational prior to completion of occupancy of the new office building. PHASE III - Phase III includes the remodel and renovation of ' the existing shopping mall. This work will only begin after the new parking garage is operational. This will assure 'adequate parking for the mall during all phases of construction. Work on the , toN shopping mall will require approximately 20 weekvIANNit4eDIr to complete. orri,oF REgroN 1991 , CONSTRUCTICH Euw LAgerli • (REFERENCE MOBILIZATION DIVINING SHEET M-1) eteLA:11164d • A) HOURS OF OPERATION: Normally the construction work hours will be a single shift from 7:00 am to 3:30 pm. These hours will minimize the local traffic impacts of our labor force on "rush hour" traffic. B) HAUL ROUTES: Construction materials and manpower will access the site via the new road constructed in Phase I. This will minimize the impact on the existing office and retail space. The general contractor will be required to schedule major deliveries at off peak hours and flagman will be utilized to assist in traffic control. C) STAGING AREAS: (SEE MOBILIZATION DRAWING SHEET M-1) During Phase I the area of the new roadway will be utilized for staging. The requirements during this phase . will be minimal. During Phase II, the construction of the office. building and parking garage, the construction administration will be housed in trailers located as indicated at the north end of the site adjacent to Grady Wes., Materials will access via the new road and will be received and stored as indicated on the west side of the parking garage and the south end of the new office building. During Phase III, the remodel of the shopping mall, both the construction administration and the material receiving area will be located as indicated, to the east of the existing. • mall. Care will be taken to protect the public access to existing stores. The contractor will provide construction barriers and projected walkways for the public. D) EMPLOYEE AND OONTRACIOR PARKING: Temporary parking for employee and contractor personnel during all three construction phases will be as indicated to the west of the new access road. ' E) EROSION CONTROL: The entire perimeter of the new construction will be contained by erosion control fabric fencing to minimize sediments in surface run off. (SEE MOBILIZATION DRAWING SHEET M-1) F) TEMPORARY SIGNAGE: For protection of the public, the entire new construction area will be contained inside temporary Cyclone fencing. Gates will be provided for access acceptable to fire and police services. Adequate temporary lighting and signage will be provided to protect the public and clearly direct both construction and public traffic. G) DISPOSAL OF HAZARDOUS WASTE: A contractor will be chosen that can demonstrate that their project managers and. superintendents have been trained in how to deal prop rly with hazardous materials in terms of their use, handling, and if required, disposal. The best way to avoid hazardous waste problems is to not be a hazardous waste generator. Many common materials which are used in the course of construction can be in the hazardous waste classification. The contractor will be required to order proper quantities so that a minimum of waste will be generated. laboring and reeorc1keeping procedures will be implemented to manage product so that it never becomes hazardous waste. H) NOISE, LUST AND DEBRIS CONThr)L: The general contractor will be required to take appropriate action to reduce the negative impacts of construction noise, duty and debris on the surrounding neighborhood. The contractor will be directed to minimize construction noise in the early morning hours, control of dust and construction debris will be mandatory and will not be a problem. r^_, %0 e CIT OF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works Department Earl Clymer, Mayor Lynn Guttman,Administrator January 29, 1991 Loren Laskow Renton Village Associates 15 S Grady Way, #509 Renton,WA 98055 SUBJECT: Village Place North ECF;SA;CU-078-90 Dear Mr. Laskow: The date of Tuesday, February 12, 1991, at 9:00 a.m., has been set for site plan and conditional use review for the above-referenced matter. The hearing will be held in the Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall, Renton,Washington. The applicant or representative(s) of the applicant is required to be present at the public hearing. A copy of the staff report will be mailed to you before the hearing. If you have any questions, please call 235-2550. ly, Donald K. Erickson,AICP Zoning Administrator cc: Brian Cloepfil ' The Callison Partnership, Ltd. 1420 Fifth Ave, Suite 2400 Seattle,WA 98101 Richard Teo Renton Talbot Delaware c/o GSIC Realty • 333 Twin Dolphins Dr, Suite 700 Redwood City, CA 94065 • • hexflr/DKE/kae 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 ~ � CITY OF RENTON FEB 0 8 1991 Y CLERK'S o-sh 6 7 15/ CP) AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION Kathleen Hoover ,being first duly sworn on oath states that he/she is the Chief Clerk of the NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON HEARING EXAMINER VALLEY DAILY NEWS RENTON, WASHINGTON A Public Hearing will be held by the Ren- • Kent Edition • Renton Edition • Auburn Edition ton Hearing Examiner at his regular meet- ing in the Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall, Renton, Washington, on Daily newspapers published six (6) times a week. That said newspapers February 12, 1991 at 9:00 a.m. to consider are legal newspapers and are now and have been for more than six the following petitions: VILLAGE PLACE NORTH months prior to the date of publication referred to, printed and published ECF;SA;CU-078-90 in the English language continually as daily newspapers in Kent, King Applicant seeks: 1)site plan approval for County, Washington. The Valley Daily News has been approved as a legal development of a new 260,363 square foot office/retail sales building,with a conditional newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for use permit to address the fact that this King County. complex, proposed to be ten stories/133 feet in height will exceed the height limit allowed for the structure under the Zoning The notice in the exact form attached, was published in the Kent Edition ordinance; 2) site plan approval for con- XX , Renton Edition XX , Auburn Edition xx , (and not in struction of a six level parking garage; 3) site plan approval for renovation (including supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers partial demolition)of an existing retail center during the below stated period. The annexed notice a P u b 1 i c Notice now on the subject property and for renova- (N o t i c e of Public Hearing) 5273 tion of services areas. The proposed devel- opment also includes improvements to existing on-site amenities(e.g.,landscaping, January 31 � 19 91 ingress/egress routes, and parking). was published on A second phase of this project is to be proposed for development at a future date: this phase is tentatively planned to include The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the 115,000 square feet of office/retail space. The City will require that Phase II undergo sum of$ 5 9 - 9 4 complete environmental and land use review at the time of application submittal. L-7/ The projects have been allowed to be sepa- rated because the phases are not function- ally interdependent. The project is located at Renton Village Center/South Grady Way. Legal descriptions of the files noted above are on file in the Development Ser- 6 t h Feb. 19 91 vices Division, Third Floor, Municipal Build- Subscribed and sworn before me this day of ing, Renton. All interested persons to said petitions are invited to be present at the Public Hear- ing on February 12, 1991 at 9:00 a.m. to express their opinions. q(vie.fiLelit2_ Published in the Valley Daily News Janu- - —'1r7_,.np t_e_s//�� ary 31, 1991 5273. Notary Public for the State of Washings residing at King County, Washington VDN#87 Revised 4/89 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON HEARING EXAMINER RENTON,WASHINGTON A Public Hearing will be held by the Renton Hearing Examiner at his regular meeting in the Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall, Renton, Washington, on February 12, 1991 at 9:00 a.m. to consider the following petitions: VILLAGE PLACE NORTH ECF;SA;CU-078-90 Applicant seeks: 1) site plan approval for development of a new 260,363 square foot office/retail sales building, with a conditional use permit to address the fact that this complex, proposed to be ten stories/133 feet in height will exceed the height limit allowed for the structure under the Zoning Ordinance; 2) site plan approval for construction of a six level parking garage; 3) site plan approval for renovation (including partial demolition) of an existing retail_center now on the subject property and for renovation of services areas. The proposed development also includes improvements to existing on-site amenities (e.g., landscaping, ingress/egress routes,and parking). A second phase of this project is to be proposed for development at a future date; this phase is tentatively planned to include 115,000 square feet of office/retail space. The City will require that Phase II undergo complete environmental and land use review at the time of application submittal. The projects have been allowed to be separated because the phases are not functionally interdependent. The project is located at Renton Village • Center/South Grady Way. Legal descriptions of the files noted above are on file in the Development Services Division, Third Floor, Municipal Building, Renton. All interested persons to said petitions are invited to be present at the Public Hearing on February 12, 1991 at 9:00 a.m.to express their opinions. Publication Date: January 31, 1991 Account No.51067 hexpub OF RED A �. O a0 z DTI bE O,flg E reo SEPIel' City of Renton Land Use Hearing Examiner will hold a PUBLIC HEARING in CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL ON FEBRUARY 12, 1991 BEGINNING AT 9:00 A.M. P.M. CONCERNING: VILLAGE PLACE NORTH ' ECF;SA;CU-078-90 APPLICANT SEEKS: 1) SITE PLAN APPROVAL FOR DEVELOPMENT OF A NEW 260,363 SQUARE FOOT OFFICE/RETAIL SALES BUILDING,WITH A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ADDRESS THE FACT THAT THIS COMPLEX, PROPOSED TO BE TEN STORIES/133 FEET IN HEIGHT,WILL EXCEED THE HEIGHT LIMIT ALLOWED FOR THE STRUCTURE UNDER THE ZONING ORDINANCE;2) SITE PLAN APPROVAL FOR CONSTRUCTION OF A SIX LEVEL PARKING GARAGE;3)SITE PLAN APPROVAL FOR RENOVATION (INCLUDING PARTIAL DEMOLITION) OF AN EXISTING RETAIL CENTER NOW ON THE SUBJECT PROPERTY AND FOR RENOVATION OF SERVICES AREAS. THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT ALSO INCLUDES IMPROVEMENTS TO EXISTING ON-SITE AMENITIES(E.G.,LANDSCAPING,INGRESS/EGRESS ROUTES,AND PARKING). A SECOND PHASE OF THIS PROJECT IS TO BE PROPOSED FOR DEVELOPMENT AT A FUTURE DATE; THIS PHASE IS TENTATIVELY PLANNED TO INCLUDE 115,000 SQUARE FEET OF OFFICE/RETAIL SPACE. THE CITY WILL REQUIRE THAT PHASE II UNDERGO COMPLETE ENVIRONMENTAL AND LAND USE REVIEW AT THE TIME OF APPLICATION SUBMITTAL THE PROJECTS HAVE BEEN ALLOWED TO BE SEPARATED BECAUSE THE PHASES ARE NOT FUNCTIONALLY INTERDEPENDENT. T . .,..‘ , ,,,... �'� z�''� x,. r ..,...„ _ - :. 1. 1 r . '..1" 1 I I. :::_ T. I _ :• - 111) I d " _.___ ' 1: 6 Id d,\�. "_. \ ..:.�..��. , i ice- u u tl\hi it. et ��d a GENERAL \OCATIO `' .. ND/OR 'AD RESS:, RENTON VILLAGE CENTER/SOUTH GRADY WAY FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CALL THE CITY OF RENTON BUILDING&ZONING DEPARTMENT 235-2550 THIS_NOTICE NOT TO BE REMOVED WITHOUT hexps`r ` PROPER AUTHORIZATION 1 r j 1 CERTIFICATION 1 I Viarf3 Say610,.. , - HEREBY CERTIFY THAT ` 3 COPIES OF HE ABOV6,1 ,c,UMENT ' WERE POSTED BY ME IN CONSPICUOUS LAC,,F `�ci. &T Al ✓..� BY THE DESCRIBED PROPERTY ON sio �- l - 9t • v NOT In:71` ARY . A1 OQ o T: ;Subscribed and sworn to before me, a li.'9j�.1(4 NotarLA i , in and for the State of Washington • ##°0 �' fYd e6P , on the / ,SIGNED : y� , �10oea1®®oanss ���. lltJ�i • OF RED o O z , NAL g (3 T I cE....... ::, (2, 09g.. . 09q e • ) Q SE131 " • ' • City of Renton Land Use Hearing Examiner . • will hold a . puBLIC HEAR1110 : ' in CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS , CITY. HALL . • • - ON FEBRUARY 12, 1991 BEGINNING AT 9:00 A.M. P.M. .. CONCERNING: VILLAGE PLACE NORTH - ECF;SA;CU-078-90 . APPLICANT SEEKS: 1) SITE PLAN APPROVAL FOR DEVELOPMENT OF A NEW 260,363 SQUARE FOOT OFFICE/RETAIL SALES BUILDING, WITH A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ADDRESS THE FACT THAT THIS COMPLEX, PROPOSED TO BE TEN STORIES/133 FEET IN HEIGHT,WILL EXCEED THE HEIGHT LIMIT ALLOWED FOR THE STRUCTURE UNDER THE ZONING ORDINANCE; 2) SITE PLAN APPROVAL FOR CONSTRUCTION OF A SIX LEVEL PARKING GARAGE; 3) SITE PLAN APPROVAL FOR RENOVATION (INCLUDING PARTIAL .DEMOLITION) OF AN. EXISTING RETAIL-CENTER NOW ON THE SUBJECT PROPERTY AND FOR RENOVATION OF SERVICES AREAS. THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT ALSO INCLUDES ' IMPROVEMENTS TO EXISTING ON-SITE AMENITIES (E.G., LANDSCAPING, INGRESS/EGRESS ROUTES,AND PARKING). A SECOND PHASE OF THIS PROJECT IS TO BE PROPOSED FOR DEVELOPMENT AT A FUTURE DATE; THIS PHASE IS TENTATIVELY PLANNED TO INCLUDE 115,000 SQUARE FEET OF OFFICE/RETAIL SPACE. THE CITY WILL REQUIRE THAT PHASE II UNDERGO COMPLETE ENVIRONMENTAL AND LAND USE REVIEW AT THE TIME OF APPLICATION SUBMITTAL. THE PROJECTS HAVE BEEN ALLOWED TO BE SEPARATED BECAUSE THE PHASES ARE NOT FUNCTIONALLY INTERDEPENDENT. . LV. ' ,,,,!...... ' 4....21------ - . "*""" (i\:•$-jr-:=':::::.'-';':ci:::::.---...:,,,''''' ' •( \i ' • ./.:31Ar.• '.1 i 1,1: • . . • _ I II, •t . 1.r1 M, ��i,u ,-� -(� .1 .. ,.. /Q -11•••y','1 �� ►- �� NYC lu /1 v,\N„..ii.H4----14-a7,-. upliaa1111:24! • • . GENERAL C:A1T:I0' • •DR .IADD RESS:, RENTON VILLAGE CENTER/SOUTH GRADY WAY FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CALL THE CITY OF RENTON • BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT 235-2550 THIS NOTICE NOT TO BE REMOVED WITHOUT hexpslr PROPER AUTHORIZATION ,. "• `r PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF i',.-.:tvrcy.`9 JAN Z 2 1991 CITY OF RENTON MEMORANDUM DATE: January 22, 1991 TO: Don Erickson • FROM: figelf Randall Parson • SUBJECT: VILLAGE PLACE N•RTH - CONCEPTUAL DRAINAGE PLAN We have completed our review of the conceptual drainage plan (enclosure) submitted to us at a meeting last Tuesday, January, 15, 1991 by The ORB Organization on behalf of the developer and have approved it with the following qualifications: (1) The methods proposed for providing compensating storage for the fill to be placed within the 100 year floodplain are reasonable but will need substantial additional refinement at the construction plan stage with respect to design details. These details should include, but not be limited to, addressing the following criteria: Underground Compensating Storage Retention Fields: These should be designed to assure adequate conveyance of the flood waters into and out of the field. Measures should be incorporated to protect the fields from oils and clogging from silt and sediment both during construction and on a permanent basis. Access points for monitoring the health of the fields should be provided. A filter fabric envelope to prevent migration of fines into the fields should be included. A safety factor of 50% should be incorporated in the sizing of the volume of storage to allow for deficiencies in analysis, design, construction, operation, and maintenance. The fields should be "chambered" to control the degree of potential clogging throughout the fields. Garage Basement Ponding: Parking on this level should be extra and not used to meet the building's minimum number of required parking spaces. Flood waters should be allowed to pond up to no greater than one foot in depth and an overflow system provided that will prevent overtopping of adjacent roadways or flooding of adjacent structures. There should be a separate system to collect runoff from washing of the floor and direct it into the sanitary system with a passive means to prevent such flow when the floor is • subject to flood waters. Signs should be provided to warn building users that the floor may be subject to flooding during heavy rains. A gate system should be considered at the entrance to this floor that would be automatically triggered to close when flood waters are present. It should be noted that these concepts, while innovative and acceptable in concept to the Storm Water Utility, are non-standard and may not meet the requirements of other City codes or departments. (2) The proposed extension of the 72 inch line to the southwest portion of the site will require a hydrologic analysis to address impacts downstream. This pipe could Don Erickson Village Place North Page 2 possibly reduce the floodplain on the site and eliminate the need for all or a portion of the compensatory storage proposed and warrant's analysis. At a minimum, this pipe could be partially extended as a new conveyance system hydraulically connected to the compensatory storage areas to provide controlled inundation and recession of flood waters rather than the uncontrolled waves of surface flows that will currently pass across the parking areas. (3) Biofiltration facilities are required for all new impervious surfaces in excess of 5,000 square feet that will be subject to vehicular use or storage of chemicals per Core Requirement #3. This would include areas that are currently gravel or compacted earth and that are proposed to be paved. It appears that there may not be any areas that will require these facilities. (4) Any off-site work in the downstream wetland areas such as improvements for water quantity or quality control should be considered as a separate project with, therefore, a separate SEPA process. We assume you will coordinate the applicant's receipt of this information. If you have any questions regarding these qualifications, please call me at extension 5548. 91-060:RLP:ps CC: Lenora Blauman Gregg Zimmerman Ron Straka Enclosure .,. ... . • - co•Q CY) . 5:t• „ or).. ..14411• Z id Ai• •.• 1,44<z"Ave.‘2. 4•6111 if.X MP- . 13.65,11/411,/4.11i1 ;;:' --------1-lui „...,_______./ 1 .. 1.1.... :}:ii ill IT:...c,.......s,•.,i:.,\,..),i..,. 4..:..:.1..,,... .;..,....:.\. '..1-- f .'''',•...j..-""."-7'.'—'...... :::--..... 1 1 .. 1 II cirsvic.2.X-v,-77_ -• . --„ • • . - 4 r* • . . • 1 '.........,. -A/.----.. l'fr • ' . ' ,..........''''' . ..., . / . c.:::jr.-...77.... .,,,, y--.._t ..,-, -.. I ., .---, p I...., / • -, 1 J --.1-,_ - • - I i /7, -.................... - .-::••-7••........1 ni., ; .....•••.Di Oftt ..i 1 .••••••... ---.....:___/,...A.,;-•,..4,.45„rr:12-• .. --.•-•%v i ......- -••••.......1 i ••-•:.--•- wat„r•oo. F'•-•; i '' C.... .! 1.7-• I ( • g •' , : I '+-•...,Z1-•-•., -..- ......'r .....•....Y....74%! ,ittir-e -.--..- ______..., • i ; .r„'... - '"•. : 1 r• i • --..r. r. •• • /. / .....1 , . t..• ,;...,....... -•-•••••..................s... i i • . 7/). - i..0 •• ';:e‘'..-c.., / .) , . .. , .. •. . • 1 *': /,- • • im.`""—IR 1 /I ..• . I/ I FEMA 24.0: / ...;,.... ,,,g';....:., / ., • r -• / / ,',/ .'.' . :1..re: ;" ''• ki / ... ! ; ' IIII • , 1 1 ; '.• ....... /-.., "•• ......,••*''....L 1, -;.; i .."....ne.v.,i.sE...,...... ...."............ .7 ....1-,••• ii I i ! I 1/,) .1'r . , :..:. i ! / . / I ::.._...t....:,.<, ....• I •' •-•,-,..... .... , 1 9 ,: . -:-.: </ I l'?ciff.t,:i I .: • ........••; UNDEFIGROUR3 / / , .' / 1 . I . . I FLOOD COMPENSATING STORAGE I "'"% '0."...... / • / I , , . • I ih ,,. 1 it .. . . . . . . ! • :.' : . I- / . - . I I I I -- • ---- i if. -... . •.! \ .., . iskse , , 1 ( i.. . • • . /I i / /,''.--"--- MX1511101 I .1 1... ji? : / • ---.:., •FEMA 21.0\ 1 : / / • ' l , . : - •. • . I ::.•, ''.WWIveist newt*Tr . : 7 _'' t-1.----\14i,_ I / / :,,,. 4, . •• ,. : , : ,I . : . : . 115;•::* ' n ktii.---' / 4'4 • i A• ' , / 1'Y' /. i•.• '-•.• .:, ,•I i 1 1 • .......,.• • - , 14 GARAGE Fli0OR FCS TO 8' if,......./ .. res tuc 1 I \1 i LI..1.;., c.\ 14 -.---. :.,.."....:,:". 07.6t:'''r't..-?:, 7'0:77.4S, '' .•''''.••••''6.8,• '''"•- r'''. *V / ' /C ./ .;,i.%/:' - I i : . . ......... ........"...' "V't '' /" - rilli . . .r, ` •f ..,, , —• —„,,,,,LI i..., • I \ii 1 .. oi ( . . IL...k.s,...- ; •, FRflflPASS e\ ''',((..1.f.V. ........... .. .... . umfaran AMP(0/9/1/541116 mroko(1.1.4 wow; . .) - (.1 / , oof 1 m•tb . / ...1::::...-..-.- , , • -------- ..0, ,.. , i 1 49 / -- ---- I :•••-• ., : N —-----.-.-- i EXIST 0/WS% . *0' r1.1 / 4 \ i ---. --------:::....•••••: (i '''''..---,,,., I ) -:•;;;:: -a r.:zr.•,1 ... v ....,_ 4. 1 t 11 1 rvi:A.i, I ) 1-i, .,.!,‹,, if, ‘', • \ ‘,"•,.,2 N:i.,•• . .;" fl/- F MI .1:•, /-___... if - „...,...., .., :• ,, 1 •-••_.......--••••: i i-, .: ,:• .. , , --7:-7----..„- .',.• ... ! .......- ---66 •-.7.......„. ,,..:.,!,...,1.; . i.t.1,;-...; <,....., i.\, S) 1:./ "f' 2 pl 1 r•-•-.., 1 To -- EXIST 0/V44"' • '•,.....' -TIN,4:......- L.....:,,-„,../':'..,i1 -'•:7`r:I.,...78...;.,,..., - V ,';',' . ''''.... -----1-17 i .. , • .-.,,' ;:f..----,-, 470 - . •. ••. ••. . ••• •••••.. .. .... ......, ,..,........-.. ..,..,..... ..... ...,.. a - .,•. • e 0! . , . . . _ ...,....;‘,.\...7r, ] , •. •.. ...•••.. ,...„..„,,,,,i,....,,,17,...„ ill ....i...c.. r:f..., 3 1 i /../ ., 441 4. .......... .... ' .. .. •• . • .„.••• ._.. . • ., . ,....„,.... ., . .. _ -, ., _..... ...... . ' ..... --• '---..... : . •. .7. .. 2. .. .. . • .COMPENSATING STORAGE CONCEPTS W P1 ' d °t, > V ,...... , ............ Zi, t i / COFCEPTUAL ,..151.900 CF EXIS1710 100 TR F1000 FtAIN VOUAE STCRN .4'....7;....c,-.'"'-'.. .',....,•:."-'--_....‘j--..... ....--..,...4 s ::::-......„ .: ,,,...,,,,:,,!,,; .. 84,800 CF FtfILIIE 100 yn m000 PLAN VOLUM MANAGE, ,.. _ /If . • 87,100 CF COMENSATFICI STORAGE(FCS)RECURS', .. ..' •...'-'• . • FLOOD • • PROTECTOR , : ......-- .... •... ••••-•,-...., : 22,300 CF NEW 72'LPE&PAAM1OLES WATES ?t.1)11‘.S1'..1.3,51'.:4,.IAI 1r 1 ...--"" I 15./00 C:F GARAGE FLOOR ......„,...... /.. 55,900 CF 11113EFIGRIXRC FCS — JON 0 9008 ' 93.910 CF 108%0F REOUITENENT ... ..... ...'....,. -. --0-- - f70170f-X17-' fg MA .. s#7113- v''.- ... .t1/4 0) Jo p, 0 iiii $4), .-4/4,4 e es ..Abs • ...i., 4. cNi .,a,,,, • . a. o • 3 Q. ° ...4•120 . • . . . • . mearniparimar • ' Ii4CP ft10.1). ii.IMV.I(X.Mr', ?til ; , . , , 011011\ I i TYPICAL ' ".„ r _ , • • ,. ,...,ettint,,..,...,,,,.---- : : . I'• i-..." '(.... :', •.•-•:',':.',::,', ,. .... '1 '',.'?'4.1'14:,;':.•'." i ',.... . 4,• I • • • 1 ---'' ... :i ',":::::::%,-,,•-. ,.,„k , i ,1:7--"."-:...,..,'.. .: ...,-.c-.., ,, 7.- I f :—71-,Z,,,,-.:-. 9 .:\ l77 ...ig,tis :,• I • ,,,. '-----.... ! ; I •. , 6 . • 1 - / i - .4 .--a,'•-:;':'.:-....,: . .:,', -J--. •ii . . lI i.1. ...: ';/-1 i..! '' '-',7,/:; 1'11.l.r:....::,.,'.,-....:".,..0.:. ... ,.7.‘,'.....,:(.:27'''':i,../11' f'1 :i'...di 1' ,.,'' ....,..'' ; :',1"--; ................ i. i • .,„... . i ., , IgEMA24.0! / ...:. ... ,P. / 1..; I.:. ' ,....J ........ . ........ . C"APE"SMING"DRAGE? .",,,,,„..- .s l:>:, 11/11:11:://...1.'1....---L--V.... .i*---1=-----...::.............:i'llifiFEIE:xiSi,I.TING2.4..4\'‘...'...\civs sToRmi: :.1.r:.1.1.::':.:.'''''''''''''''''''"''''''''''''''''''''"''"'''''''.i '''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''' -1...,.,.'..:......'..1'..........'1..;'''...'::...s' 1.1 . •••• r'''''‘1. • -...... ;'''',:.:,•••••;. ..'.•;?.:,'-:.'.;,' / /f '!... 1.111,3ERGROUN3 / I: :. : / s' j I 1 1. '1' . I ;: i \. 1 II of 00 WaKe , , i , . :lii,1 AN,*NurF 4 FoNtnie?g. •. . " .' ,,,:: 7 e•C"...:. I LVE:Slerrirea ' ', ._...:;...?'':' 46Y . ''.4.- i- 12' •444`'.A1 I / :\ .4- /. . \',..„../,r-_:).1 ....i.ff.._..,_ 7 ../ .....c,,..),..iii / „,,,,........,1 y...; . ' # :•-•,•!,e' i.:: ''''''':`;64,94 \/ f . (-) '-:;.‘ ..\ , ...•.... ,. . •'' •-,. -frircjnr-fp, .4r-4" . ...?. ) . 5 - ' -0",.. '; L'1:, . .., .- .z.„ . faj,..,r •1'—''''1''') 1411r°:" . .0.Avi-AR ,•, • . w•m•no..m.f ,, 1 . nRutow ,)N ii, '' :•.'' 1 IfikiNifill (•!''" -1•- _ L-4Car^w our- r..,nr-irAnc,,i•-•!o.gr ''''•-. 4 \ 1..4 utafgrom Rom tontV-WPG vorPeo 074 mute/ ' .. • i , „ BYPASS li , , '..„ .'''''''' :- ' u----- !.. t J----../ L.:, •.,: 'st , •-I \\s,..d/ 1 ... _ ....- ,...) N ''''''''',--- c.' i ."-7.,'... ..) i TO EXIST OIWS\ •\ \\ . 1 6 "•••.•''' , :f „..'......' , if• - - • .„,, / , : ,,.... ,, • L,,,,,i.:;...-wi , .. • ,• : .!...,,,,, ,,:,-r. ,:,:.., \••,*> \ i i .., ••• ..„ ., ,, . .--. .. . --------- j :' • ,..:•$.=:-. 1 - F ilin I ,1 , '-.... \. ,.., i -,,-:-..". ---• -----, •, . .,.. 1 .,....,, . ,.,.,,,,,.-- „. .. . ,. \......Li . . ii. ri.. ., --... ._.... o..... ...... .......... ..... c--- .77 .. 4,e,:z140. -•-....'''''' 2 m I -..,,v,:. I. -- '''' :..., '',..,,• ;••"'1 i .. " Ul 01''', . • , 14.....• --___J-- r. o! _. . . . . . ....._....•....... I11 . ,..•••..... , .. , : ...„. .... i .. . „ ..\., •... ,..rdliliti•-•:-..- ,...:.:„ ; ,...,. .„ ,::::- . . /... Pi . ..... .....,.,.. -....,, :. d 1!i ; •i:.,-....:'.: .„*.. . . • . i ,..,,,,„ i,...:• : /I .. . . : . .. • „., > if i • &,..'....''...,:.,....-. ,-. i•-. .,- ....•„.....•.,• . . . .. ...,./, .1;I ....„.-„ . .. ,. :• • -. - ,-.,;,.• ,i ONIPENSATING STORAGE CONCEPTS ...••••,. ,e'../..!::.'!;,'!:‘'.,' . ''''t:''...:''.'z'.•••......''—.. ' - •.. ,,„•P•• i •,.. CONCEPTUAL v / ..7 , 151.900 CF EXISTNO 10070 FL000 PLAN VOLUME STORM ""''',.fr',.!!!:°'r'"v .- HAGS CF FUTURE 100 Yll FLOOD PLAN VOLUME °RAMAGE . 117,100 CF COPMENSATNO STOFIACIE(FCS)REOUmEr .N!........ s'i <F, N, ; '':' :-1.-- 1---- .. ''...-I !":-::-.;•.i.,....or. -----___. -.--:,,,-.,,:;',.... ,,,,-..;...::.',.„,.-'.',''::: ::::: p ,7 • •.:•.-:.:., (..•:!-' ' #•.-, . .-=--- dir .- ''''''''''' ;,„--,.,,....;.-.....:,:.t. ix,FIX ERDs',9." , tj ' '.. ' .' •.** •.. ,' F1000 • . PROTECTION _-__F- : 22.300 CF NEW Tr LPE&TAMMOLES . PLAN Ft4',14';!i.^1r,1;! !,,;V )i) I .* ''''''''''''-....,,,... ,f an°CFE YllAnAIAEGA1193"FCS —-— i'i ,10.? " -• j.. , .• JOS I 1100S.'' . . 93.000 CV wax OF REOUMEMENT 0 ,. ..... .... • • - .. ' . 0 • '. :';''''' IPKI‘ifiNl& IAA' 1.4.o 1 to , _ CIT OF RENTON Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Earl Clymer, Mayor Lynn Guttmann, Administrator January 10, 1991 Loren Laskow Renton Village Associates 15 S Grady Way, #509 Renton,WA 98055 SUBJECT:. Village Place North • ECF;SA;CU;V-078-90 Dear Mr. Laskow: This letter is to inform you that the comment period has ended for the Determination of Non-Significance- ' Mitigated for the above-referenced project. • Letters of comments were received and are attached for your information. The Committee's determination is final and may be appealed to the City's Hearing Examiner no later than 5:00 p.m. on January 28, 1991. Any appeal must state clearly why the,determination should be revised and must•be accompanied by a non-refundable$75.00 filing fee. To appeal this Declaration,you must file your appeal document with the hearing examiner within.fourteen • (14)days of the date the Declaration of Non-Significance is final or the Declaration of Significance has been published in the official city newspaper. See City Code Section 4-6-23, RCW 43.21 C.075 and WAC 197-11- 680 for further details. There shall be only one appeal of a Declaration of Non-Significance or Declaration of Significance, and if an appeal has already been filed,your appeal may be joined with the prior appeal for hearing or may be dismissed if the other appeal has already been heard. If you have questions or desire clarification of the above, please call Lenora Blauman at 235-2550. For the Environmen a v' ittee, • Donald K Erickson,AICP Secretary , cc: Brian Cloepfii • The Callison Partnership, Ltd. 1420 Fifth Ave, Suite 2400 Seattle,WA 98101 • Richard Teo Renton Talbot Delaware c/o GSIC Realty 333 Twin Dolphins Dr,Suite 700 Redwood City, CA 94065 et,tapel/DIE/kae 200 Mi11 Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 CITY OF RENTON JAN 2 2 1991 RECEIVED CITY CLERK'S OFFICE. q•9'2 51067 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION Kathleen Hoover ,being first duly sworn on oath states 1 NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION that he/she is the Chief Clerk of the ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTON VALLEYDAILY NEWS The Environmental Review Committee • . (ERC) has issued a Determination of Non- • Kent Edition • Renton Edition • Auburn Edition , Significance-Mitigated for the following pro- ject(s) under the authority of the Renton Dailynewspapers sixtimes a week. That said newspapers Muecipal Code. The gf tion pg cAesscant(s) published (6) have completed a mitigation process: are legal newspapers and are now and have been for more than six VILLAGE PLACE NORTH months prior to the date of publication referred to, printed and publishedA Epplica Cu;v-ova-90 in the English language continuallyas dailynewspapers in Kent Kingdevelopmtent seeks: 1)newsite plan6 square fot g development of a 260,363 square foot County, Washington. The Valley Daily News has been approved as a legal office/retail sales building(with a conditional newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for use permit proposed to be ten stories/133 King County. feet in height will exceed the height limit allowed for the structure under the Zoning con- The notice in the exact form attached, waspublished in the Kent Edition Ordinance);utionof five site plan approval for ki struction a level(1396 space)parking X X , Renton Edition X X , Auburn Edition X X , (and not in garage to supplement the existing 261 supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers spaces to be retained; 3)site plan approval duringthe below statedperiod. The annexed notice a Public i c Notice t i c P for renovation e(inclu centerg nowpart )ond theelisub- of an existing retail sub- ject property and for renovation of services (F.n v i r n m P n t a 1 n e t P r m i n a t i cn n) 51 R R areas;and 4)a variance for the constructionof a new private roadway to serve the devel- opment. The proposed development also was published on .T a n ii a r y 1 d 1 9 A 1 includes improvements to existing on-site amenities(e.g., landscaping, ingress/egress routes, and parking). A second phase of this project is to be The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the proposed for development at a future date; $4 . 9 2 this phase is tentatively planned to include Sum of$ 115,000 square feet of office/retail space. The City will require that Phase II undergo complete environmental and land use review at the time of application submittal. The projects have been allowed'to be sep- arated because the phases are not func- tionally interdependent. The project is located at Renton Village Subscribed and sworn before me this 17 th day of Jan. 19 91 Center/South Grady Way. Further information regarding this action is available in the Development Services Division, Third Floor, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington, 235-2550. This Deter- mination is FINAL. To appeal this Declara- tion,M C �/�(! you must file your appeal document k — with the hearing examiner within fourteen (14) days of the date the Declaration of Non-significance is final or the Declaration Notary Public for the State of Wa, ington of Significance has been published in the residing at iratrunr,Re,,,340` King County, Washington VDN#87 Revised 4/89 —. NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated for the following project(s) under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code. The following Applicant(s) have completed a mitigation process: VILLAGE PLACE NORTH ECF;SA;CU;V-078-90 Applicant seeks: 1) site plan approval for development of a new 260,363 square foot office/retail sales building (with a conditional use permit to address the fact that this complex, proposed to be ten stories/133 feet in height will exceed the height limit allowed for the structure under the Zoning Ordinance); 2) site plan approval for construction of a five level (1396 space) parking garage to supplement the existing 261 spaces to be retained; 3) site plan approval for renovation (including partial demolition) of an existing retail center now on the subject property and for renovation of services areas; and 4) a variance for the construction of a new private roadway to serve the development. The proposed development also includes improvements to existing on-site amenities (e.g., landscaping, ingress/egress routes, and parking). A second phase of this project is to be proposed for development at a future date; this phase is tentatively planned to include 115,000 square feet of office/retail space. The City will require that Phase li undergo complete environmental and land use review at the time of application submittal. The projects have been allowed to be separated because the phases are not functionally interdependent. The project is located at Renton Village Center/South Grady Way. • Further information regarding this action is available in the Development Services Division, Third Floor, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington, 235-2550. This Determination is FINAL To appeal this Declaration,you must file your appeal document with the hearing examiner within fourteen (14)days of the date the Declaration of Non-significance is final or the Declaration of Significance has been published in the official city newspaper. See City Code Section 4-6-23, RCW 43.21 C.075 and WAC 197-11-680 for further details. There shall be only one appeal of a Declaration of Non-Significance or Declaration of Significance, and if an appeal has already been filed, your appeal may be joined with the prior appeal for hearing or may be dismissed if the other appeal has already been heard. This appeal period which will end at 5:00 p.m. on January 28, 1991. Any appeal of this decision may be made to the City's Hearing Examiner, Municipal Building,200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, Washington 98055. An appeal must state clearly, in writing,why the Determination should be revised and must be accompanied by a non-refundable$75.00 filing fee. Publication Date: January 14, 1991 Account No.51067 pubnot . • TAN 22 '91 09:44 CALLISON PARTNERSHIP 206-6234625 .\ . P.1/1 Callison PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF RENTON • (i2a.fr JAN 2. 2 1991 kiECEIVED • • Date: 'rime: 7;5Z) Facsimile To: /eFie? A— ". 11/ Cover Sheet From: j.."TiV i'rOleCt: pi/ 44e A:. _- Number?f Pages: • (Including a Cover sheet) • • •• • • Remarks; IV & flN.rdvorier nfc, ii20-iszectiva .„ 47.1-74e7 /116r PIP faV45 Ac/.7741A&Z' • feVillywo ceo 44(4:zyvr 'PAL 7E are rm- fA/G- ,d6)421temo(a/A42539gre- 4,1*44 • -7-?••• • • 0 Corporate Headquarters: 0 California Office; The Callison Partnership,Ltd. Architecture - 1420 Fifth Avenue 9S0 Sixth Avenue A Corporation Programming Suite 2400 Suite 200 Planning Seattle,Washington San Diego.California Interior Design 98101 92101 Graphics - • - 206 623-4646 (619)232.3233 FAX 206-623-4625 FAX 619-232-3337 Dd P.1,Indpiyt AUL JHN CC ' 1 0b;44 LHLL1bUIY I-'HN,I I`itI-bl Ilf✓ CUb—bd4bc '+ems • tl • • rN PLANNING DIVISION CITY OP RENTON • JAN221991 itiECEIVED • • • • • REFLECTIVE GLARE STUDY • VILLAGE PLACE NORTH RENTON, WASHINGTON • • • • Prepared for The CaWlison Partnership Prepared by . • C1-1221V1 HELL 777 108th Avenue NE • Bellevue, Washington 98009 • January 1990 JHN Le U" 4 ( HLLIbUN I'HKINbIKbHJJ- REFLECTIVE GLARE STUDY -- VILLAGE PLACE NORTH EXISTING CONDITION'S The site is currently occupied by a parking lot and small one story bank. The only existing sources of glare are the bank building windows and vehicle windshields. IMPACTS OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT METHODOLOGY The methodology for evaluating.glare impacts that is used in this analysis is described in the City of Seattle Light and Glare Study. Phases I and II, (Department of Community Development, 1980). Smooth specular surfaces, such as glass, reflect the sun's rays in a parallel fashion, producing a reflection called spot glaze. Visual discomfort may occur when spot glare from a building's surface enters an observer's cone of vision. A motorist's vertical cone of vision is considered to be a field from 30 degrees above the viewer's line of sight to 45 degrees below his or her line of sight. A Motorist's horizontal cone of vision depends on the speed of travel. For example, at 45 to 55 mph a motorist's horizontal cone of vision is estimated to be 30 degrees to each side. At 25 mph it is estimated to be 50 degrees to each side (The Freeway and the Qity, OSDOT, 1968). It is assumed that glare outside the cone of vision will not interfere with a person's vision, and that the observer may avert his or her eyes from the source of the glare. Because of the sun's annual path over the Seattle area, and the limits of an observer's cone of vision, visual discomfort from spot glare is a potential impact at sunset, sunrise, and during the daylight hours of winter when the sun's altitude is less than 30 degrees above the horizon. The times when the sun is 30 degrees or less above the horizon at Renton's latitude are shown in Table 1 for days representative of the`sun's position throughout the year. Table 1 Times During which Solar Altitude is 30 Degrees or Less March/September 21 rune 21 December 21 Sunrise to 9 a.m./3 p.m. to Sunrise to 7 a.m./5 p.m. to Sunrise to Sunset sunset sunset 3 - :r h'.4f 1 JHN LL " 1 U'�;4b (.HLL1 bUN FHK I IYLKDH11 LCD-bcd4bL . Y The sun's altitude also affects the intensity of the sunlight and therefore the intensity of the reflected glare. The sun has its lowest intensity when it is low on the horizon (i.e., sunrise and sunset), since its rays are filtered and scattered through the earth's atmosphere to the maximum extent at this time. The City of Seattle study recommends that glare impacts be analyzed with respect to major roadways, public spaces, and residential areas for the hours when the altitude of the sun is less than 30 degrees. Major roadways are defined as arterials having at least 20,000 average weekday daily trips (AVVDT) or a posted speed limit of at least 40 mph (Light and Glare Study, pages 23 and 24). Roadways in the project vicinity that meet these criteria are S. Grady Way, SR 167, SR 515 (Talbot Road), and Interstate 405. Each of these roads have above 20,000 AWDT and 35 mph speed limits, except Interstate 405, which has a speed limit between 45 and 55 mph near the project site. There are no public open spaces or'residential areas in the immediate site vicinity. ANALYSIS The proposed action will construct a ten-story building and five-story parking garage, The exterior of the garage would be entirely of non--reflective materials such as concrete. The exterior materials on the ten-story building will consist of approximately 60 percent reflective vision glass and 40 percent concrete, tile and other non-reflective surfaces. The specific type of vision glass has not been decided on at this time, but would have a reflectance of between 13 and 20 percent, In general, reflective glass reflects between approximately ,8 and 44 percent of the visible light. Clear double-pane glass has a daylight reflectance: factor of approximately 14 to 15 percent. The design of the ten-story building's exterior facades consists primarily of alternating bands of glass and concrete. This mixture of reflective glass and nonreflective material serves to break up potential glare bands and prevents the creation of uninterrupted walls of glare. Also, proposed landscaping around the building will help to screen glare from motorists and pedestrians. Figures 1 through 6 illustrate the general pattern of reflected sunlight anticipated to be generated from the proposed project on the four representative days of the year when the sun's altitude is 30 degrees or lower. The analysis assumes a 132-foot tail building. The glare bands in the diagrams also assume that the entire building facade is reflective and do not represent the nonreflective portions of the building exterior. The diagrams show the outline of the potential area that would.receive reflected glare from the building at specific times of the day. The area within each band where reflected glare is visible and unblocked by existing buildings and topography is shaded. Only the effects of the buildings shown on the figures are considered in terms of blocking reflected glare form the proposal. It should be noted that the diagrams show reflected glare at static moments in time. In reality the glare is moving between the positions shown in the diagrams. 4 P.5/JAN 22 '91 09:46 CALLISON PARTNERSHIP 206-6234E25 1:: *re Y - A • ;Tune 21 Pacific Daylight Time (PDT) Figures 1 and 2 illustrate glare bands from the proposed project on June 21st in the morning and evening. During the morning peak traffic hour, glare from the proposal would cross S Grady Way and could affect eastbound motorists. Reflected glare would move:within the motorists cone of vision at about 6 a.m. and move off the road and out of the cone of vision at about 8 a.m. Moving at the 35 mph speed limit, a motorist would move through the 7 a.m. glare band in approximately 1 second. This impact could occur from April to September with the greatest impact on June 21 as shown in Figure 1. Deciduous street trees are proposed as part of the project along S Grady Way that would be in full foliage at the time of the potential impact. The location of the proposed landscaping is such that it should screen much of the glare from the proposal that could impact motorists. Glare would begin to move into the cone of vison of westbound motorists along S Grady Way at approximately 8:30 p.m. and last until about 8:45 p.m. when the sun moves behind the hills to the northeast in the Skyway area. It would take about 10 seconds for westbound motorists to pass through the glare band occurring at 8:30 p.m., however, the impact occurs just before sunset and the intensity of the reflected light would be decreased as a result. Here again, proposed street trees would screen much of this glare. This glare impact could occur during the two weeks before and after June 21 March 21 Pacific Standard Time (PST) and September 21 Pacific Daylight Time (PDT) Figures 3 and 4 illustrate glare bands from the proposed project on March and September 21st in the morning and evening. As shown, there would be no glare impacts in the morning at this time of year. In the late afternoon, between 3 p.m. and 4 p.m. (4 p.m. to 5 p.m. PAT), reflected glare from the proposal would begin to move into the cone of vision of eastbound motorists on S Grady Way. The glare would become more directly in a motorist's vision as the afternoon progresses until the sun sets a 6 p.m. (7 p.m. PDT). Figure 4 indicates that the proposed 5-story parking garage would block much of the glare from reaching S Grady Way. During the 5 p.m. (6 p.m. FDT) peak traffic hour, when the glare is well within the motorists • cone of vision (25 degrees to the right), the parking garage would block 80 percent of the glare band reaching S Grady Way. An eastbound motorist would move through the unscreened 5 p.m. glare band in 2 seconds. Impacts along S Grady way in the evening could potentially occur for about two months in the spring and fall. Existing evergreen trees along the south side of S Grady Way will partially screen glare from eastbound motorists. December 21 Pacific Standard Time (PST) During the winter the sun is at the lowest altitude above the horizon and consequently can generate very long glare bands. Figures 5 and 6 illustrate glare bands from the proposed project on December 21st throughout the day. In the early morning, until about 8:3Q a.m., the sun is blocked by the hills southeast of Interstate 405 and SR 515. From 8:30 a.m. until 10 a.m., glare from the proposal would cross S Grady Way and be within the cone of vision of 5 JFIN LE: "1'1 V_PJ;4( LHLL1b'I' h'H .I I Li'bH1F' 6Jb-bLb4bc7 westbound motorists. The reflected glare would be less than 20 degrees to the left of westbound motorists at 8:30 a.m. and move further to their left later in the morning. At 8:30, it would take a westbound motorist travelling at the speed limit 10 seconds to move through the glare band. Reflected glare from the proposal could potentially be visible within westbound motorist's cone of vision in the morning for approximately two months'before and after December 21. The greatest potential impact would occur at 8:30 a.m. on December 21, as described. Deciduous street trees proposed along S Grady Way would not have leaves during this time and would not screen the glare. There is also the potential that eastbound traffic on Interstate 400 could experience glare from the proposal between 8 a.m. until just after 8:30 a.m. The 6-story Evergreen Building would block this glare until about 8:30, at which time the glare would be outside a motorist's cone of vision. After noon, glare from the proposal could reach S Grady Way, Interstate 405, and SR 515. In each case, the glare would either be screened by existing buildings, the proposed parking garage, or topography; or it would be outside the motorist's cone of vision. Summary Reflected glare from the proposal could potentially impact eastbound and westbound motorists on S Grady Way at various times of the year. With one exception, potential glare impacts would be of short duration, partially or fully screened by existing or proposed landscaping, or just prior to sunset when the sun's intensity is greatly reduced, The exception is during the morning in late fall and winter when glare would be within the cone of vision of eastbound motorists on S Grady Way for up to 10 seconds. This and the other impacts would be reduced by the building facade design (60 percent glass which alternates with nonreflecetive horizontal concrete banding) and the low reflectivity of the glass (13 to 20 percent). The most significant impact occurs during the four month period roughly from November through the end of February. Climatic conditions during the winter months limit the number of occasions when glare can occur because of the limited number of sunny days. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration climatological data from Seatac Airport indicate that during daylight hours, 84 percent of the sky is covered with clouds, on average, during this four month period (Local .Climatological Data: Annual Summary with Comparative Data, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. 1987), As a result of these climatic conditions, glare impacts in the winter would be less than indicated by this analysis. MITIGATION MEASURES There are several mitigation measures that could reduce glare impacts. As mentioned, the proposal already incorporates some of the mitigation measures available. These are: a facade design alternating reflective glass with nonretlective concrete, a reduced glass surface area of 6 F JHI1 GG 'J1 I'y:4ti LHLL1UN F'H .I NLI bh1I LlOb-bLd4b . (/l� • 60 percent on the exterior facades, and glass with a low reflectance factor of 13 to 20 percent. Additional mitigation measures that could be added to the project include changing the building orientation or the angles at which the individual glass panels are installed, providing shading devices, or providing landscaping to screen glare from impact areas. Additional measures to mitigate glare during the morning in late fall and winter vary in their degree of practicality and appropriateness to the significance of this impact. The;two most practical measures would be to provide evergreen trees along S Grady Way and/or use glass with a very low reflectance factor (i.e. 13 to 15 percent) on the building's east facade. Adding shading devices would be effective but could be expensive to install. Similarly, changing the orientation of the glass or the orientation of the east facade would also be effective. In order to be effective, however, the windows or entire facade would need to be angled approximately 30 degrees to the south. This could result in a loss of interior floor space if the windows are angled and would require a redesign of the project if the entire facade is changed. 3 1 O J c 7 '` . g 2 r'9 'i r •,,,,?r t-w,,,,,z, , .,,,,Z . , • • • .410,L, * • , a 5g/ .15'-_1115'l3H w/cz71/7c' - j Ds. HL..v D th • ..------Vl____Lc'N\`!6/ 1 ,.,. . ..T ,_S'C 7fr -.- -„- - .- :. .-.7"'".---- -''' '*' (11 N%\\ \I'lN'''-'''''I"--'-""<(Nil 1(\ Id nit- M . T l.., ISM Yk6ft �, i REHy�;'os;ice. • • . %fp Nat ta 4,L*;A „. , • i :..,4 V i ` a._ zyz-n ZH. L . . __ / : ri r---H---1 r---11--- ---ir 1 I - -----? / ---) r" . '•T/Q.,I ._ c.7q&R7g1-c1R7 ITN ?17fJ 11H- IJC1gT11H71 .b:t^,G1 T „ 27 IJ- • JHN " L' -711 LVJ:zi'J LHLL15UN HHN I Nt_I- 5H1.1-' Llelb-bLd4b , .. , - ..) -...- / • . I L.__1 1..„ 1 1,_ I 1.---1 L.-1 L.../ • .5 7777, ..5 7: . 7 \ ... . .. ..5. • ....:,"-----,.-- -IP" . _,;.„f,-,"..-.:::;,,,•0 6/9,,,:, • 1 4 i f' , 0 Bs...0 4?. 1, ; iiire.x3i , ,,,,,;4,1 ell - ,fra_4.44, ( __,.... ) • - .;VI"' . .,- MINIIIL;:; /WIFFIkAMI. '714..:,:: i 0 . .. -61 ,,,,,,,, ,, 4,„A/7", 11/44,4E 1-z_ ...., if ,----- 0 _ \ 7"----ill ---- .-- . 0-LiAl -- ----------------------- JAI i k_,-......._.T.-tr-s-rr ..---- 14—'1- TT ...--- \l) 4 in is. V;} .-... Nc vt 1------ f 1 I.- 4)1,. 157h, -.5. r --1 i 7i\ .......nl.M11•91Mil•••••• % .1) - Zd/WIN6 lied6HT"- 573 '.5 • . otgeA), - via.A6g 71,4e. woRTH Pxcporc) • 'ettl Ofrle...6 roweR. . P",..."4., .n... • Siou -. 141,..2,04., 4:der), **---.., 1 Ideaw..Z . t J1-11i cf:c_.' —J1 IffJ; U LEILL1bUIN 1-'1-1N I Nt_N51-111-' lib—bLd4be•D , . . . • • . , . • . . • ' L,......... J I11__._ .._,J 1...._1 1_11_1 7 1..,_/ • 7 / ST • ._, ,.. 4 . \ vgie : --------r2ADY 6 . ® : .. /0 "Pi ..• •-r—I.. .T.:$70.:,:;',544.1,. „1.% .1 4•4 MEM4. .... m. 01 , 4. 0 5 ReN76V, yzz. 4aE •• I . 1 ......---- ---1--4. --- --r--) --- _... ----- ,-- -".2- .. -• - --_-------.---:'-- ---- A7r -------- —1.-- ----'N.--- 11 .„----0-T . \ '...i 0 4 r., ....... --- ka..) P , . _ . .. , ...„ ... . , Of 4;$ 41.111.-P1N6 Ne./6147-- 67-e5 ..,....z., • ,...-..- - via,46g FLAe.4- Nagriv 7:27P.cpce ....•.1 ws 6 -FzE roweR, • Seetze ..3 • .4",a/se.2, ,.,,....„.,-2/75.107e#11-44'7....,W , ,,ze•I'i4s .:,57.er4wevzeg/7;"‘,-4. JRN " E '' I. 1:1 :51 UHLL1bUN 1-1-1K I NEKbH.1.1-' -66b-b .J4b . • t-'. -.1.1/.1- , 1 •>. . . 1 •. ; . . •,;• . CI, . • --„_..-1 1.-• -. _-_ 1-,-1 _...1LI —1--5 I-- ,•777/ 5 r_ . • . . . . ' • .„ - • ''' • . . V • . \ . i ,. . .. . . • .. . . t! WAY . ."' • 4r..*'4'11-1 -15. . 6-Pm l . .."-all• ' ••04 rail,. .?i,:: 14-- - ' ' :::-.:‘'',7:7.;V:;.':ii; r•Xitti'l 0 -----.., Pi 1 . -...•=:*.:7:';.S.5,;4t, .0,441 .., : go) •',.,:s.::;;...,. ..`,.. • ''''..:.• . . . I p im IA . i r. 4,veaterov I'LL.4•4•E PL. r...- ...\,-F- 1_21:=7---r ----- .----1------------------------:: . .N •• 1 , . - -=.-•-.-- .7„..7______------ . ..: •. . . . ', •,h.,_,i . . • •Z „ S /577/ 57: kr) 1— \ 7---- -1 r- -1 r - • . ® - /3tiravAio Rel6Hr.. „57-4;eia 0 •• , •,;',,i,..il - vu..A4E 7rztAf—.6 NORTH PgerrtED ...- .t a:N ca,FAece -7-caLic . . . ,..., • • fr---, .,e.e/t 1 -11 . . : . /17144 ,4.2/7,5e/aZ4icidie4.12. ne..Vee.a ... 71Z414(e2,140e. 77;P447.*.,,. . JRN Ea .- 1 IJ' :51 CALLISUN HRH I NLH,S1-1.1.1-" 6ib-Ea :.-.14be.:, 1-. ILL/1J . . . 3 • : • • .. • , , . '4 , • . *• * ' . . . . ) . . / . •• ___„ ._. .. L...____.. 5 7TH St . . i • 4 . 0 .---/ , 111ii. 1/•41,,•' \ ‘ liar. . o4trek4:4$4,:_. ,. L(2i... " .046"- • ,,„ 5 ,e0. ..,( ... .t. " _.,--------- gili , , ite ,Z ; ;:si 444/ 1-iisi'•%,..%•?.4111''. ..) ... ..-,-------.----..----------------,.. ---- 0 ---- . 0....÷. ), ,t0.0-4 2. 12) f It ,.•.,.;.,nev--,, ! ,fr .7:7" .v.itf.4AriE .,7 t.,f,.,,iiii 7 .1../• •,,v ; .5 Rekrav vizz,46E Ft. --7," .".-7./....>";,/, 4'..41r . • •.'" / ./. ,' ..iii 11 401 ideinq 1 0 / rij p dikl,.404040 Iv- , ......:?..p. . . . . . , • --- .,6 07 . ql gain r N,„ .6thet4,7 4 0 -zti ,7------ fi illii . / il 1 . . 0 - 2501W/N6 Re/6,41r- 57 efis 0 .26zziog_42, •,T,t,ii - Viz-LA PLAelo NaeTH Ple.CFC)56 ) km cifr- e TOWER, • • . • • 2:e ...4-- • .251.eaff2.4m-, ,,„ ..e.erau,kt,tfre,4 --.9-1 5 o airi 11• - ...I HN •ze ' .1 eli:te L:f-ILLISON HRH I f•ILHSH1H •ZUb-b.c::..4bc:b • , -. -- • •; , .....: .--• L ... _11____.1 L__I LI L/ / • ct,• 4 771/ 5T - ------ c_7._ . 3/207 • • •••.;.. . • '1'4, '?,'..1, .,. , ,,,., . ,, • ,i . \.,:.,•• ,.:i. • ••;111 II, :.f,•.‘:.:-;.,:;,:i, ,',,i.s ,..,\•,.-.'.., . -zpiri \\SF i ....:.-Nis,.,..0.,,,r-,,...•,..... 1 pr37 ,.......,,,-,..ira.,...-7, • "-.. .:'0.,5'.--t*:';'....,•;:, . *.. IF, • -.i --e.,-ivA. • yt*. i \ . %At): J.,. ,.. :., • r .o.1,;. ..,o..•<t.i: ..*:' ' .•'"•1' •:P. P":i; .1. i '''V;i.,A•v-h. ;;: WAY ', '" • ',•:til`.; ••ei;Li. •6 P.V.1 •Vii,' ,:g• - J 16111x.f,t••,..,• ---7 • .- . .11M-1 ,c•-•*--T f..0 1-Ie., ;1 •• Cr ---- . •.:,..,..,7,W el.:44441 '• 't (.11.' 'T.1••'-'4 .cilv'y'i itNi.44-4, d.-1 , • 7 , ' '''\1 fee•O do ,I.,,,,4,o1,1,\•,. - r--- ci ,.. • ------• ...7.,:..a/ .\ .,1..,:s.... 2?-1. v 't • NU ,1, 4`..01,:A..`!,):;!.1•.I...,,,•.,. .,,1).•',../J.,,,,,,, ' V •;.\ ',L.A., • EU \!;\., N,..-,i,-. ,.. ,. ......,,..,--v---- ..,.. 4 .c.., 71/4:t.,.i. Illt....0,00,r,*--,, ..,, '41 ,.( \ •1 , 1.-----7----- , . S. i •-• ..-.'".-."--.-1 ..- i ' .,.-.-'-'-'-'.."7-'-irrie fr i-..-' -'. 4'• y; inr."*.' 1-. -' '• , K"' V, •. Iki.1b: .6''."'.•.:.s.', r'', -..--,.-..- il 16 f'.E . -:',.;:r4•:.,.„.; 1 , 121/ .oetia,,,.7 1 i ... J. ,._.. •, S /57H 52" r-----------\ 7-----——1 f-------1 7----- Til 1.-\ ck _ 3014.D/N6 eig/61-fr- .57-4e, ..6 !1,11114Ar' . - Via-46e r'1,4?-E Nac;77-/ 2,"R.67 i -'4•:11 4.F'F/eZ 7.0Wle .444/404,..2 ;tzpiet"17 • 771:rre.';74' _.5-7-zi.1,47e.r/7;isiee • _:, NITICE ENVIRONMENTAL ' DECLARATION APPLICATION NO. ECF;SA;CU•V-078-90 VILLAGE PLACE NORTH • PROPOSED ACTION RENTON VILLAGE ASSOCIATES APPLICANT SEEKS: 1) SITE PLAN APPROVAL FOR DEVELOPMENT OF A NEW 260,363 SQUARE FOOT OFFICE/RETAIL SALES BUILDING (WITH A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ADDRESS THE FACT THAT THIS COMPLEX, PROPOSED TO BE TEN STORIES/133 FEET IN HEIGHT WILL EXCEED THE HEIGHT LIMIT ALLOWED FOR THE STRUCTURE UNDER THE ZONING ORDINANCE; 2) SITE PLAN APPROVAL FOR CONSTRUCTION OF A FIVE LEVEL (1396 SPACE) PARKING GARAGE TO , SUPPLEMENT THE EXISTING 261 SPACES TO BE RETAINED; 3) SITE PLAN APPROVAL FOR RENOVATION (INCLUDING PARTIAL DEMOLITION) OF AN EXISTING RETAIL CENTER NOW ON THE SUBJECT PROPERTY AND FOR RENOVATION OF SERVICES AREAS; AND 4) A VARIANCE FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW PRIVATE ROADWAY TO SERVE THE DEVELOPMENT. THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT ALSO INCLUDES IMPROVEMENTS TO EXISTING ON-SITE AMENITIES (E.G., LANDSCAPING, INGRESS/EGRESS ROUTES, AND PARKING). A SECOND PHASE OF THIS PROJECT IS TO BE PROPOSED FOR DEVELOPMENT AT A FUTURE DATE;THIS PHASE IS TENTATIVELY PLANNED TO INCLUDE 115,000 SQUARE FEET OF OFFICE/RETAIL SPACE. THE CITY WILL REQUIRE THAT PHASE II UNDERGO COMPLETE ENVIRONMENTAL AND LAND USE REVIEW AT THE TIME OF APPLICATION SUBMITTAL. THE PROJECTS HAVE BEEN ALLOWED TO BE SEPARATED BECAUSE THE PHASES ARE NOT FUNCTIONALLY INTERDEPENDENT. GENERAL LOCATION AND OR ADDRESS RENTON VILLAGE CENTER/SOUTH GRADY WAY • POSTED TO . NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE [E.R.C.] HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION ❑DOES DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT ❑WILL KWILL NOT • BE REQUIRED. THE CITY OF RENTON WILL NOT ACT ON THIS PROPOSAL FOR 15 DAYS FROM THE DATE BELOW. COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY AN APPEAL OF THE ABOVE DETERMINATION MAY • BE FILED WITH THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER BY 5:0o P M., JANUARY 28, 1991 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON PLANNING DIVISION AT 235-2550. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION y� envpstr CERTIFICATION I , l/f/fT: �/VIHEREBY CERTIFY THAT COPIES OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENT/ WERE POSTED BY ME IN • CONSPICUOUS eeaeep °�v�`'' .�S� �9N9o0R NEARBY THE DESCRIBED PROPERTY ON ��, 7� 7/ P' .•° �°\ssioN G l 4. :o NOTAW3Y �'YITTE j: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a N; PUBLIC frotar� Public, n and for the State of Washington • g91,,°°rafii in on the j/ SIGNED . •� °. ..... H of � / eons NOTICE ENvIRONMENTAL DECLARATION APPLICATION NO. ECF;SA;CU•V-078-90 VILLAGE PLACE NORTH PROPOSED ACTION . RENTON VILLAGE ASSOCIATES APPLICANT SEEKS: 1) SITE PLAN APPROVAL FOR DEVELOPMENT OF A NEW 260,363 SQUARE FOOT OFFICE/RETAIL SALES BUILDING (WITH A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ADDRESS THE FACT THAT THIS COMPLEX, PROPOSED TO BE TEN STORIES/133 FEET IN HEIGHT WILL EXCEED THE HEIGHT LIMIT ALLOWED FOR THE STRUCTURE UNDER THE ZONING ORDINANCE; 2) SITE PLAN APPROVAL FOR CONSTRUCTION OF A FIVE LEVEL (1396 SPACE) PARKING GARAGE TO SUPPLEMENT THE EXISTING 261 SPACES TO BE RETAINED; 3) SITE PLAN APPROVAL FOR RENOVATION (INCLUDING PARTIAL DEMOLITION) OF AN EXISTING RETAIL CENTER NOW ON THE SUBJECT PROPERTY AND FOR RENOVATION OF SERVICES AREAS; AND 4) A VARIANCE FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW PRIVATE ROADWAY TO SERVE THE DEVELOPMENT. THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT ALSO INCLUDES IMPROVEMENTS TO EXISTING ON-SITE AMENITIES (E.G., LANDSCAPING, INGRESS/EGRESS ROUTES, AND PARKING). A SECOND PHASE OF THIS PROJECT IS TO BE PROPOSED FOR DEVELOPMENT AT A FUTURE DATE;THIS PHASE IS TENTATIVELY PLANNED TO INCLUDE 115,000.SQUARE FEET OF OFFICE/RETAIL SPACE. THE CITY WILL REQUIRE THAT PHASE II UNDERGO COMPLETE ENVIRONMENTAL AND LAND USE REVIEW AT THE TIME OF APPLICATION SUBMITTAL. THE PROJECTS HAVE BEEN ALLOWED TO BE SEPARATED BECAUSE THE PHASES ARE NOT FUNCTIONALLY INTERDEPENDENT. GENERAL LOCATION AND OR ADDRESS RENTON VILLAGE CENTER/SOUTH GRADY WAY POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE [ E.R.C. ] HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION ❑DOES XDOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT ❑WILLWILL NOT BE REQUIRED. • THE CITY OF RENTON WILL NOT ACT ON THIS PROPOSAL FOR 15 DAYS FROM THE DATE BELOW. COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY AN APPEAL OF THE ABOVE DETERMINATION MAY BE FILED WITH THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER BY 5:00 P.M., JANUARY 28, 1991 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON PLANNING DIVISION AT 2 3 5-2 5 5 0. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION envpslr tkotk% '' CITY F RENT ON Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Earl Clymer, Mayor Lynn Guttmann, Administrator January 4, 1991 Loren Laskow Renton Village Associates 15 S Grady Way, #509 Renton,WA 98055 SUBJECT: Village Place North ECF;SA;CU;V-078-90 Dear Mr. Laskow: This letter is written on behalf of the Environmental Review Committee and is to inform you that they have completed their reconsideration of the environmental impacts of the above-referenced project. The Committee has determined that your project may be issued a Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated with the following revised conditions: (See attached Mitigation Measures Sheet) Staff urges you to contact the various City representatives, as appropriate, (e.g.,the Public Works Division) - as soon as possible,to obtain more information concerning specific mitigation elements recommended,for this project, if you have specific questions. This information will assist you in planning for implementation of your project and will enable you to exercise your appeal rights more fully, if you choose to do so. If you have any questions or desire clarification of the above, please call me at 235-2550. vironmenta view mittee, 0,41 Donald K. Erickson,AICP Secretary Enclosure cc: Brian Cloepfil The Callison Partnership, Ltd. 1420 Fifth Ave, Suite 2400 Seattle,WA 98101 Richard Teo Renton Talbot Delaware c/o GSIC Realty 333 Twin Dolphins Dr, Suite 700 Redwood City, CA 94065 ercdecsn/DIE/Rac 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2569 CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST NO.: ECF-078-90 APPLICATION NO(S): CU;SA;V-078-90 PROPONENT: Renton Village Associates PROJECT NAME: Village Place North DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Applicant seeks: 1) site plan approval for development of a new 260,363 square foot office/retail sales building (with a conditional use permit to address the fact that this complex, proposed to be ten stories/133 feet in height will exceed the height limit allowed for the structure under the Zoning Ordinance; 2) site plan approval for construction of a five level (1396 space) parking garage to supplement the existing 261 spaces to be retained; 3) site plan approval for renovation (including partial demolition) of an existing retail center now on the subject property and for renovation of services areas; and 4) a variance for the construction of a new private roadway to serve the development. The proposed development also includes improvements to existing on-site amenities (e.g., landscaping, ingress/egress routes,and parking). A second phase of this project is to be proposed for development at a future date; this phase is tentatively planned to include 115,000 square feet of office/retail space. The City will require that Phase II undergo complete environmental and land use review at the time of application submittal. The projects have been allowed to be separated because the phases are not functionally interdependent. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Renton Village Center/South Grady Way LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Development Planning Section The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). Conditions were imposed as mitigation measures by the Environmental Review Committee under their authority of Section 4-6-6 Renton Municipal Code (see attached sheet). These conditions are necessary to mitigate environmental impacts identified during the environmental review process. This Determination of Non-Significance - Mitigated (DNS-M) is issued under WAC 197-11-340(2). Because mitigation measures have been imposed, the lead agency will not act on this proposal for fifteen (15) days from November 27, 1990. Any interested party may submit written comments which must be submitted by 5:00 p.m., December 12, 1990, in order to be considered. A fourteen (14) day appeal period will commence following the finalization of the DNS-M. Responsible Official: Environmental Review Committee c/o Don Erickson, Secretary Development Services Division Department of Planning/Building/Public Works 200 Mill Avenue South Renton,WA 98055 PUBLICATION DATE: November 27, 1990 DATE OF DECISION: N�erAz r 2'�1 VI I0 SIGNATURES: 1f o Lynn A. G t an Administrator GATE Departme t f PI ping/Building/Public Works Joh . ebley, drninistr or DATE Co unity Service Dep ment //— / r ee a er, ire ie TE Re on ire Department mitsig DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED REVISED MITIGATION MEASURES • DECEMBER 21, 1990 PROJECT: Village Place North PROPONENT: Renton Village Associates ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST: ECF-078-90 APPLICATION NUMBER: CU;SA;V-078-90 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Applicant seeks: 1) site plan approval for development of a new 260,363 square foot office/retail sales building (with a conditional use permit to address the fact that this complex, proposed to be ten stories/133 feet in height will exceed the height limit allowed for the structure under the Zoning Ordinance; 2) site plan approval for construction of a five level (1396 space) parking garage to supplement the existing 261 spaces to be retained;3) site plan approval for renovation (including partial demolition) of an existing retail center now on the subject property and for renovation of services areas; and 4) a variance for the construction of a new private roadway to serve the development. The proposed development also includes improvements to existing on-site amenities (e.g., landscaping, ingress/egress routes, and parking). A second phase of this project is to be proposed for development at a future date; this phase is tentatively planned to include 115,000 square feet of office/retail space. The City-will require that Phase II undergo complete environmental and land use review at the time of application submittal. The projects have been allowed to be separated because the phases are not functionally interdependent. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Renton Village Center/South Grady Way RECOMMENDATIONS: The Environmental Review Committee issued a Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated with the following conditions: 1. The applicant shall, in order to address aesthetic impacts, revise the landscape plan to include more significant landscaping around the southwestern facade of the five story parking garage in order to soften its apparent bulk, with a conceptual plan to be approved to the satisfaction of the Planning/Building/Public Works Department and the Fire Department prior to public hearing for site plan/conditional use review and a specific plan to be approved to the satisfaction of the Planning/Building/Public Works Department and the Fire Department prior to issuance of site preparation/building permits and with landscaping to be installed prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. 2. The applicant shall, in order to address light/glare impacts, prepare a solar glare diagram for those hours of the day on the equinox, summer, and winter solstices when the angle of reflected sunlight is at an angle of 30 degrees or less with the horizon, in order that staff can ascertain whether reflected glare is likely to impact 1-405 or Grady Way traffic. This diagram shall be submitted to the Development Planning Section at least two weeks prior to public hearing, so that staff can ascertain whether mitigation measures should be recommended to the Hearing Examiner for light/glare management. 3. The applicant, In order to address transportation system impacts, shall: a) directly provide improvements proposed for the Grady Way Benefit Zone, to the satisfaction of the Transportation Systems Division, prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy for this development; OR b) make a contribution of $436,758.32 to the (pending) Grady Way Transportation Benefit • Zone, prior to the issuance of site preparation/building permits. 4. The applicant, in order to address local transportation system impacts, shall provide improvements to the south leg of the intersection of South Grady Way and Lake Avenue South, including: a) designated travel lanes as presented on the site plans submitted by the applicant (dated October, 1990); and b) improvements to signalization (e.g., equipment relocation) at the Grady Wav/Lake Avenue intersection to ensure safe, efficient functioning to those designated travel lanes. These plans shall be approved by the Transportation Systems Division,.prior to the Issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy for the subject development. mitmeas-1 5. The applicant, in order to address local transportation system impacts, shall provide improvements to street lighting (replacement of mercury vapor lighting units with sodium vapor units) along the south side of Grady Way South extending from Lake Avenue to the eastern boundary of the site,to the satisfaction of the Department, prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy for the subject development. 6. The applicant, in order to address local transportation system impacts. shall make a contribution in the amount of$4,000.00 as a fair share payment toward a study to be conducted by the City to: 1) determine the feasibility of improving the Grady Way eastbound right turn lane (to open this lane up to through traffic from Rainier Avenue to Talbot Road); and 2) determine the feasibility of improving the intersection of Talbot Road South/South Grady Way, through channelization improvements (e.g., curbs, signalization, elimination of right turn trap at the south leg of the intersection). This contribution should be provided to the satisfaction of the Transportation Systems Division prior to the issuance of the first site preparation/building permits for the subject development. In the event that this study determines that improvement is feasible, and the City elects to install modifications, the applicant will be called upon to provide a fair share contribution to this improvement, (with the maximum fee assessment based upon the 2873 ADWVTE estimate for this development with the cost of the study credited as a portion of the fair share contribution. 7. . The applicant shall, in order to address transportation system impacts, provide a Transportation Management Plan, including (but not limited to): a) provision of van pool/car pool systems, preferential parking for HOVs, fee-for-parking plan for employees, subsidized bus passes, public transit and ride-sharing information materials, a bus shelter, "kiss-and-ride"facilities, bicycle lanes, bicycle parking plans, and a fair share contribution to a study exploring the feasibility of implementing a shuttle service to the site from the local residential community; b) a system/fees for monitoring of the TMP to determine its level of functioning and to make necessary modifications (such as relocation of preferential parking); and c) an implementation schedule to serve the new office/retail complex. Facilities plans shall be developed to the satisfaction of the Planning/Building/Public Works Department and METRO, prior to issuance of site preparation/building permits. Service plans shall be developed to the satisfaction of the Planning/Building/Public Works Department and METRO, prior to issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy. Facilities and services shall be implemented at the time of occupancy of the first structure. (Note 7.1: If, after having had in place an effective TMP for two years, the applicant can demonstrate the need for additional parking, he can request release of the reserved parking. It shall be the responsibility of the Planning/Building/Public Works Administrator to release sections or all of the parking places held in reserve.) 8. The applicant shall, in order to address transportation system impacts and public safety, provide a parking plan which includes, but is not limited to: a) placement of twenty percent of the 1432 parking spaces required for the office facility in reserve (with the reserve parking spaces to be shelled off on the top level of the parking garage); b) reserved parking areas on the roof of the garage, with landscaping, seating and a jogging trail in those reserved areas); c) establishment of a system for assigning parking for retail consumers, vendors and visitors to the office complex to outside areas and the lower level of the garage,with signage indicating those spaces which are so reserved and restricting parking to specified periods; d) construction of load/unload areas next to the skybridge at the second level of the garage; e) establishment of a system for assigning upper levels of the garage to employees, with signage indicating those areas which are so reserved, and with a security system (controlled access, lighting, emergency service phones, etc.); and f) provision of a total of 29 handicapped parking stalls to serve employees, consumers and visitors -- with those spaces serving the office building to be adjacent to the skybridge and those spaces serving the retail area to be immediately adjacent to the retail center. These plans shall be established in concept, to the satisfaction of Planning/Building/Public Works, the Police Department and the Fire Department, prior to the public hearing for site plan/conditional use review. Specific plans shall be approved to the satisfaction of Planning/Building/Public Works,the Police Department and the Fire Department, prior to the issuance of site preparation/building permits, and shall be installed prior to issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy. (NOTE 8.1: The applicant is encouraged to install a hydraulic elevator in the parking garage for the convenience/safety of employees,visitors and vendors.) 9. The applicant shall, in order to address impacts to earth and storm water management impacts, , develop a storm drainage plan and flood protection plan.(including elevation of all structures a minimum of two feet above the flood plain and providing compensatory water storage areas on site), based upon the Surface and Storm Water Management Ordinance. The conceptual storm water management plan must be submitted at least two weeks prior to the public hearing for the project and approved by the Storm Water Engineering Section in advance of that hearing. A specific storm water management plan shall be approved by the Storm Water Engineering Section prior to Issuance of site preparation/building permits. • mitmeas-2 • , r (Note 9.1: The applicant may elect to address storm drainage management exclusively through on-site retention/detention or may develop a plan for routing water to the Panther Creek Wetlands. If the wetlands are to receive water from this site, the plan for conveyance and/or deposit must be approved by the State Departments of Fisheries and Ecology, the Army Corps and related agencies. The Storm Water Engineering Section will take responsibility for coordination of plan review with federal, state and local agencies, as necessary.) 10. The applicant shall, in order to address impacts to earth and storm water management, provide a "hold harmless" agreement which acknowledges that the City has informed the applicant that the subject property is located in an area which may be included in an existing/altered 100 year flood plain, and that the applicants have decided to proceed, at their own volition, thereby waiving their rights to hold the municipality liable for any flooding and/or for any damages to property or person arising from such flooding. This document is to be approved by the Storm Water Engineering Section and the City Attorney, and to be duly recorded prior to the issuance of site preparation/building permits. 11. The applicant shall, in order to address on-site recreation impacts, provide a plan for interior recreation areas (with shower facilities in the office/retail building, for use by employees ). This plan shall be approved, in concept, by Planning/Building/Public Works prior to public hearing for project review. Specific plans shall be approved by the Planning/Building/Public Works Department, prior to issuance of site preparation/building permits; facilities shall be installed prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for the building. 12. The applicant shall, in order to address community recreation impacts, provide: a) a plan for development and implementation of off-site recreation improvements to the satisfaction of the Parks and Recreation Department; OR b) make a voluntary contribution of $20,000.00 to the development of community recreational facilities (Comprehensive Parks Plan, Master Trails Plan), in order to mitigate recreation impacts. In the event that the applicant opts to provide off-site improvements directly, these shall be installed prior to issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy. In the event that the applicant prefers to make a contribution, fees shall be provided prior to issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy. 13. The applicant shall develop a Construction Management Mitigation Plan that addresses: a) hours of operation, b) hauling routes, c) staging areas, d) employee and contractor parking, e) erosion control,f) the disposal of hazardous materials associated with soils remediation/construction,and g) signage identifying construction areas in order to facilitate timely provision of emergency services. A conceptual plan shall be submitted at least two weeks in advance of public hearing for the complex, and shall be approved by the Planning/Building/Public Works Department and Fire Prevention Bureau prior to that hearing. Specific plans shall be approved by the Planning/Building/Public Works Department and the Fire Prevention Bureau prior to issuance of site preparation/building permits. (NOTE: In conjunction with land use review, staff may recommend modifications to site plans and landscaping plans to achieve full compliance with Code requirements and additional conditions to ensure adequate functioning of the development (e.g., covenant for joint use of parking areas and amenities, landscaping maintenance bonds.) (NOTE: The applicant will be required to make all Code mandated off-site and on-site improvements, including sidewalks, curbs, gutters, street lighting, utility lines, and utility system fees prior to issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy.) • • mitmeas-3 RENTON VILLAGE MANAGEMENT CORPORhi ION (206)228-3000 EVERGREEN BUILDING • SUITE 509 • 15 SOUTH GRADY WAY • RENTON, WASHINGTON 98055 FAX (206) 235-8007 PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF RENTON December 12, 1990 DEC 1 31990 RECk.ivED Mr. Don Erickson City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works 15 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 RE: Village Place North Determination of Non-Significance - Mitigated Dear Don: The following are the owners ' comments to the Mitigation Measures. The comments correspond to the recommendations listed in the Determination. They are as follows: 1) The applicant will revise the landscape plan to the satisfaction of the Planning/Building/Public Works and Fire Departments. 2) The applicant will provide a solar glare diagram and address light/glare impacts. 3) The applicant will make a contribution to the Grady Way Transportation Benefit Zone, based on the elimination of items 4-7 . 4-7) The applicant wishes the Environmental Review Committee to reconsider and delete these items. The applicant feels : a) Item #4 references a study that was done by Transpo for this project in October, 1988 . To the best of our recollection no such study was done for this project at that time. b) Item #5 asks for a maintenance upgrade of street lighting. This upgrade involves approximately 33 street lights whereas only 5 of these exist along our frontage. Additionally, the traffic study does not state that there are traffic problems/accidents related to the lighting level on this street. c) Items #6 and #7 ask for contributions for improve- ments that should be included, if they are not already, in the Grady Way Transportation Benefit Zone. Mr. Don Erickson December 12 , 1990 Page 2 d) In a November 7 , 1990, letter from Transpo to Mr . Mel Wilson, City of Renton Transportation Systems Division, Transpo concludes that the Grady Way TBZ accounts for the planned buildout of this site. These items will be addressed in further discussions, if required, between City Staff, City Attorney, applicant and applicant ' s counsel. 8) The applicant shall provide a Transportation Management Plan. 9) The applicant shall place 20% of the parking spaces in the garage and shall develop a plan to the satisfaction of the referenced City Departments. 10) The applicant shall address earth and storm water management and develop a storm drainage plan to the satisfaction of the Storm Water Engineering Section. 11) The applicant shall provide the required Hold Harmless Agreement. 12) The applicant shall address on-site recreation. Please note that the existing plans provide for shower facilities. 13) The applicant shall make a "voluntary" contribution to address community recreation impacts. The applicant wishes to be advised of when and where the contribution will be used. 14) The applicant will provide a Construction Management Mitigation Plan addressing all items to the satisfaction of the listed departments. Thank you for the opportunity to supply our comments to this environmental review process and we look forward to continued discussions to resolve these issues . Sincerely, 1 4 e skow E ,ecu 'v Vice President LL/jr ::METRO- Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle Exchange Building • 821 Second Ave. • Seattle,WA 98104-1598 December 12, 1990 PL NNIr!7 DIVISION CfIYCrFtiNToN Environmental Review Committee DEC 1 31990 C/o Don Erickson, Secretary � � - Development Services Division Department of Planning/Building/Public Works 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA. 98055 Determination of Nonsignificance File No. : ECF-078 Village Place North Dear Mr. Erickson: Metro staff has reviewed this proposal and anticipates no significant impacts to water quality or to Metro's wastewater facilities. However, we have the following comments regarding public transportation services. Public Transportation Services The project site lies within walking distance of the South Renton Park-and-Ride lot which serves as a hub for transit service within the Renton area. A sidewalk should be provided along the South Grady Way frontage. Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment. Sincerely, Gregory M. Bush, Manager Environmental Compliance Division GMB:p1g5873 - - O.'' YO it't1889a STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY Mail Stop PV-11 • Olympia, Washington 98504-8711 • (206) 459-6000 December 11, 1990 PLANNING DIVISION CITY Or FEN'-ON DEC 1 3 1990 Mr. Don Erickson, Secretary Environmental Review Committee D City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue S. Renton, WA 98055 Dear Mr. Erickson: Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the determination of nonsignificance for the Village Place North office/retail sales building proposed by Renton Village Associates (ECF-078-90) . We reviewed the environmental checklist and have the following comments. 1. If water is routed to the Panther Creek wetlands, use of a natural system such as a wetland or pond in lieu of stormwater runoff treatment is not permitted under the State Water Pollution Control Act, Chapter 90.48 RCW. All runoftf discharged into a receiving water must be treated prior to discharge. Suggested methods of treatment include the use of infiltration, presettling basins, grassed swales, API or CPI-type oil/water separators, and wet ponds. 2. If the applicant elects to address storm drainage management through a plan which routes water to the Panther Creek wetlands, the plan must include treatment of that water prior to discharge into the wetlands. The plan should be submitted to Ecology's Water Quality Program and Wetlands Section for review two weeks prior to public hearing. - 3 . All storm drains within the development should be stenciled "Dump No Waste, Drains to Stream" (or Ground Water, Lakes, etc. , as appropriate) . 4. When Phase II of the project is proposed, the environmental analysis should examine the cumulative impacts of the project. 5. The landscaping plan should use native plant species. To the extent that soil types are compatible. Fir and Cedar should be planted rather than deciduous trees. Irrigation plan should be developed that emphasizes water conservation and limited evaporation. 3 L� `I A M • Mr. Don Erickson, Secretary December 11, 1990 Page 2 6. The applicant proposes to demolish an existing structure(s) . Item B.7.a of the checklist asks if there are any environmental health hazards that could occur as a result of the proposal. Improper disposal of solid waste, including demolition waste, can result in environmental health hazards. The applicant should identify the disposal site for the demolition material. In addition, the applicant should be encouraged to pursue mitigating activities such as salvage, reuse, and recycling of the demolition materials. If you have any questions on Comments 1 and 3, please call Ms. Helen Pressley in our Water Quality Program at (206) 438-7089. For questions on Comments 2, 4, and 5, please call Ms. Janet Thompson-Lee in our Northwest Regional Office at (206) 867-7128. For questions on Comment 6, please call Mr. Kyle Dorsey also in our Northwest Regional Office at (206) 867-7132. Sincerely, M. Vernice Santee Environmental Review Section MVS: 6746 cc: Helen Pressley, WQ Janet Thompson-Lee, NWRO Kyle. Dorsey, NWRO IVWashington State Duane Berentson Department of Transportation Secretary of Transportation District 1 15325 S.E.30th Place Bellevue,Washington 98007-6568 (206)562-4000 November 29, 1990 PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF RENTON Don Erickson, Chief, Current Planning Planning Division DEC - 3 1990 Public Works Department 200 Mill Avenue South 2� � � � Renton, WA 98055 SR 515 MP 7 .21 CS 174100 Mitigated Determination of Non-Significance for Village Place North File No. ECF-078-90 Dear Mr. Erickson: This letter is in response to the Mitigated Determination of Non-Significance (MDNS) , environmental checklist, and traffic study that we received from the City of Renton on November 28, 1990. The proposed development, located at the southeast quadrant of the S. Grady Way/Lake Ave. S. intersection, is for the development of a 10-story, 260, 363 sq. ft. office/retail sales building and a 5-story, 1396 space parking garage. The Department of Transportation has reviewed the MDNS, environmental checklist, and traffic study, and we concur with the mitigation measures that the City of Renton is imposing upon the developer. We have no additional comments or recommendations concerning this project. Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this proposal. Should you have any questions, feel free to contact' Don Hurter (562-4274) or Robert Eichelsdoerfer (562-4297) of my Developer Services section. Si cerely, AMES L. LUTZ, P.E tilities/Developer Services Engineer RTE:rte cc: WSDOT Local Programs Division, MS 121 440 CITY OF RENTON "LL Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Earl Clymer, Mayor Lynn Guttmann, Administrator November 27, 1990 Loren Laskow Renton Village Associates 15 S Grady Way, #509 Renton,WA 98055 SUBJECT: Village Place North ECF;SA;CU;V-078-90 Dear Mr. Laskow: This letter Is written on behalf of the Environmental Review Committee and is to inform you that they have completed their review of the environmental Impacts of the above-referenced project. The Committee, on November 21, 1990, decided that your project may be issued a Determination of Non-Significance- Mitigated with the following conditions: (See attached Mitigation Measures Sheet) • Because the Environmental Review Committee imposed specific mitigation measures rather than issue a Determination of Significance, there is a required 15 day comment period during which comments are solicited from various agencies, jurisdictions or individuals (including the applicant) who may have an Interest In the Committees decision. The comment period will end December 12, 1990. Following the end,. of the comment period, the City will finalize its Determination unless comments received require a reevaluation. Following the finalization of the Determination, there is a required 14 day appeal period. Staff urges you to contact the various City representatives,as appropriate, (e.g., the Public Works Division) as soon as possible,to obtain more information concerning specific mitigation elements recommended for this project, If you have specific questions. This information will assist you in planning for implementation of your project and will enable you to exercise your appeal rights more fully, if you choose to do so. In addition, by the end of the comment period, we should be able to establish a tentative public hearing date before the Hearing Examiner, should a public hearing be necessary. If you have any questions or desire clarification of the above, please call me at 235-2550. . nvironme t evl: • ttee, • Donald K. Erickson,AICP Secretary • Enclosure cc: Brian Cloepfil • The Callison Partnership, Ltd. 1420 Fifth Ave, Suite 2400 Seattle,WA 98101 Richard Teo Renton Talbot Delaware • • c/o GSIC Realty 333 Twin Dolphins Dr, Suite 700 Redwood City, CA 94065 'redeem/ME/km 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 .. ..� R�NTON .: :..:...... 77, CURRENT PLANNING; DIVTSTON< ::::'`•: "" AFFIDAVIT )~. :SERV On the 214a day of __ pV._vm ,r- 1990 I deposited in the mails of the Unit _d States a sealed envelope containing 4.i0.4m, , S documents. This information was .sent to: Name Representing Thelot. c 1 Mr. Paul Reitenbach, Chief, Community Planning Mr. Gregory M. Bush, Metro Department of Wildlife Mr. Joe Robels, Department of Fisheries - Mr. James Lutz, Department of Transportation Ms. Connie Corpuz, City of Seattle Duwamish Tribal Office Muckleshoot Tribal Office (Signature of Sender) Subscribed and sworn to me this day �j 19 6,�Q • +++s�������.,,.��, o£ /�� P�YI L��fii/ zAET e SSION !. �3 Pee c.) NOTARY V?� Not`d Y Pu c in and for the — — St(-it of Washington residing PUBLIC � • at ?7�f�tl�.t/ � F9:.� ��C?'�, therein. !tr pRt�R7t0-.. Prof ect Name: S ,:inti,t46•4:: � �(a11 � Ytlla* c Place Ne k3c�c • Proj ect' Ni_ tuber: SA-�1$-8� SA•o151� 90 `=W= CITE = OF RENTON =1 Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Earl Clymer, Mayor Lynn Guttmann, Administrator November 27, 1990 Washington State Department of Ecology • Environmental Review Section • Mail Stop PV-11 Olympia,WA 98504 SUBJECT: Environmental Determinations Transmitted herewith are copies of Environmental Determinations and Environmental Checklists for those projects reviewed by the Environmental Review Committee on November 21, 1990: DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED VILLAGE PLACE NORTH ECF;SA;CU;V-078-90 Applicant seeks: 1) site plan approval for development of a new 260,363 square foot office/retail sales building (with a conditional use permit to address the fact that this complex, proposed to be ten stories/133 feet in height will exceed the height limit allowed for the structure under the Zoning Ordinance; 2) site plan approval for construction of a five level (1396 space) parking garage to supplement the existing 261•spaces to be retained; 3) site plan approval for renovation (including partial demolition) of an existing retail center now on the subject property and for renovation of services areas; and 4) a variance for the construction of a new private roadway to serve the development. The proposed development also includes improvements to existing on-site amenities (e.g., landscaping, ingress/egress routes, and parking). - ti A second phase of this project is to be proposed for development at a future date; this phase is tentatively planned to include 115,000 square feet of office/retail space. The City will require that Phase II undergo complete environmental and land use review at the time of application submittal. The -projects have been allowed to be separated because the phases are not functionally interdependent. The project is located at Renton Village Center/South Grady Way. The 15 day comment period for these projects will end on December 12, 1990. Following the end of the comment period, the City will finalize it's Determination unless comments received require a reevaluation., Following the finalization of the Determination,there is a required 14 day appeal period. If you have questions, please call me at 235-2550. For the Environmental Review Committee, Qii)r Donald K. Erickson,AICP Secretary cc: Mr. Paul Reitenbach, Chief, Community Planning Mr. Gregory M. Bush, Metro Department of Wildlife Mr.Joe Robels, Department of Fisheries Mr. James Lutz, Department of Transportation Ms. Connie Corpuz, City of Seattle Duwamish Tribal Office Muckleshoot Tribal Office agncyltr/DKE/kac 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 E-, ENVIRONMENTAL DECLARATION EC F;SA;C U;V-078-90 APPLICATION NO. VII I AGF PI Ar;FGE NnP-r►-1 APPLICPPROIP:QIBEDPLAACMIFQOR DEVELOPOMENTIOF A NEW 260,3363 ASSOCIATES SQUARE FOOT OFFICE/RETAIL SALES BUILDING (WITH A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ADDRESS THE FACT THAT THIS COMPLEX, PROPOSED TO BE TEN STORIES/133 FEET IN HEIGHT WILL EXCEED THE HEIGHT LIMIT ALLOWED FOR THE STRUCTURE UNDER THE ZONING ORDINANCE; 2) SITE PLAN APPROVAL FOR CONSTRUCTION OF A FIVE LEVEL (1396 SPACE) PARKING GARAGE TO SUPPLEMENT THE EXISTING 261 SPACES TO BE RETAINED; 3) SITE PLAN APPROVAL FOR RENOVATION (INCLUDING PARTIAL DEMOLITION) OF AN EXISTING RETAIL CENTER NOW ON THE SUBJECT PROPERTY AND FOR RENOVATION OF SERVICES AREAS; AND 4) A VARIANCE FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW PRIVATE ROADWAY TO SERVE THE DEVELOPMENT. THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT ALSO INCLUDES IMPROVEMENTS TO EXISTING ON-SITE AMENITIES (E.G., LANDSCAPING, INGRESS/EGRESS ROUTES, AND PARKING). A SECOND PHASE OF THIS PROJECT IS TO BE PROPOSED FOR DEVELOPMENT AT A FUTURE DATE;THIS PHASE IS TENTATIVELY PLANNED TO INCLUDE 115,000 SQUARE FEET OF OFFICE/RETAIL SPACE. THE CITY WILL REQUIRE THAT PHASE II UNDERGO COMPLETE ENVIRONMENTAL AND LAND USE REVIEW AT THE TIME OF APPLICATION SUBMITTAL. THE PROJECTS HAVE BEEN ALLOWED TO BE SEPARATED BECAUSE THE PHASES ARE NOT FUNCTIONALLY INTERDEPENDENT. GENERAL LOCATION AND OR . ADDRESS RENTON VILLAGE CENTER/SOUTH GRADY WAY POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE' I E.R.C.3 HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION ❑DOES ' TOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. • AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT ❑WILL ZWVILL NOT • BE REQUIRED. THE CITY OF RENTON WILL NOT ACT ON THIS PROPOSAL FOR 15 DAYS FROM THE OASES �t((���WA 1990 COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY 11 AN APPEAL OF THE ABOVE DETERMINATION MAY BE FILED WITH THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER BY 5:00 RM., • . FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON PLANNING.DIVISION AT •235-2550. ' DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE envpslr WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION • CERTIFICATION I , 4,7///c. G./!�� , HEREBY CERTIFY THAT COPIES OF • THE ABOVE DOCUMENT WERE POSTED BY ME IN CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON OR NEARBY THE DESCRIBED PROPERTY ON ///,,PW7'O • ,,pv�PRET pG,4, ATTEST: Subscribed and 'sworn to before me,�eQ QN- •�gSION°4el• �o 0 Notary Public, in and for the State of Wact ° et A��°e resid in , on th . NOTARY "�° • day of 4.4/\-- / /U • • • PUBLIC C N OT I C E • ENviRoNmENTAL DEcLARATioN „ ECF;SA;CU;V-078-90 APPLICATION NO. VI a a 1, r�.F MnRT 1 RENTON VILLAGE ASSOCIATES SALES BUI RI ME OSOOIMPLf CTI OR DEVELOPMENT OF A NEW 260,363 SQUARE FOOT OFFICE/RETAIL NG (WITH A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ADDRESS THE FACT THAT THIS COMPLEX, PROPOSED TO BE TEN STORIES/133 FEET IN HEIGHT WILL EXCEED THE HEIGHT LIMIT ALLOWED FOR THE STRUCTURE UNDER THE ZONING ORDINANCE; 2) SITE PLAN APPROVAL FOR CONSTRUCTION OF A FIVE LEVEL (1396 SPACE) PARKING GARAGE TO SUPPLEMENT THE EXISTING 261 SPACES TO BE RETAINED; 3) SITE PLAN APPROVAL FOR RENOVATION (INCLUDING PARTIAL DEMOLITION) OF AN EXISTING RETAIL CENTER NOW ON THE SUBJECT PROPERTY AND FOR RENOVATION OF SERVICES AREAS; AND 4) A VARIANCE FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW PRIVATE ROADWAY TO SERVE THE DEVELOPMENT. THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT ALSO INCLUDES IMPROVEMENTS TO EXISTING ON-SITE AMENITIES (E.G., LANDSCAPING, INGRESS/EGRESS ROUTES, AND PARKING). A SECOND PHASE OF THIS PROJECT 'IS TO BE PROPOSED FOR DEVELOPMENT AT A FUTURE DATE; THIS PHASE IS TENTATIVELY PLANNED TO.INCLUDE 115,000 SQUARE FEET OF OFFICE/RETAIL SPACE. THE CITY WILL REQUIRE THAT PHASE II UNDERGO COMPLETE ENVIRONMENTAL AND LAND USE REVIEW AT THE TIME OF APPLICATION SUBMITTAL. THE PROJECTS HAVE BEEN ALLOWED TO BE SEPARATED BECAUSE THE PHASES ARE NOT FUNCTIONALLY INTERDEPENDENT. GENERAL LOCATION AND OR ADDRESS RENTON VILLAGE CENTER/SOUTH GRADY WAY POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE [ E.R.C. ) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION C]DOES ®ES NOT. HAVE AA SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE • ENVIRONMENT. AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT DWILL /VILL NOT BE REQUIRED. THE CITY OF RENTON WILL NOT ACT ON THIS • PROPOSAL FOR 15 DAYS FROM THE Dqr COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY UU ATOM,.1990 AN APPEAL OF THE ABOVE DETERMINATION MAY BE FILED WITH THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER BY 5:00 P.M., • FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON PLANNING DIVISION AT 235-2550.. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE envpstr WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION . CITY OF, :NTON DEC 1 0 1990 11sECEIVED �6Q.p� CITY CLERK'S OFFICE ! // 51067 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION NOTICE OF Kathleen Hoover ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ,being first duly sworn on oath states - ---• that he/she is the Chief Clerk of the ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee VALLEY DAILY NEWS (ERC) has issued a Determination of Non- • Kent Edition • Renton Edition • Auburn Edition Significance - Mitigated for the following project(s) under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code. Daily newspapers published six (6) times a week. That said newspapers VILLAGE PLACE NORTH ECF;SA;CU;V-078-90 are legal newspapers and are now and have been for more than six Applicant seeks: 1)site plan approval for months prior to the date of publication referred to, printed and published development of a new 260,363 square in the English language continuallyas dailynewspapers in Kingfoot office/retailol sales building (with a gKent, conditional use permit to address the County, Washington. The Valley Daily News has been approved as a legal fact that this complex, proposed to be newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for ten stories/133 feet in height will exceed the height allowed for thee King County. under the limit lZoning Ordinance); 2)ctur site plan approval for construction of a five The notice in the exact form attached, was published in the Kent Edition level (1396 space) parking garage to supplement the existing 261 spaces to x x , Renton Edition XX, Auburn Edition X X , (and not in be retained; 3) site plan approval for supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers renovation (including partial demolition) during the below stated period. The annexed notice id)1 i c Notice of an existing retail center now on the subject property and for renovation of (Environmental Determination) 4980 servicesnsruarnofas;and4)avaeroawce rtto construction of a new private roadway to serve the development. The proposed November 27 , 1990 development also includes improve- was published on ments to existing on-site amenities(e.g., landscaping, ingress/egress routes, and parking). A second phase of this project is to be The full agu5t3of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the proposed for development at a future sum of$ date;this phase is tentatively planned to include 115,000 square feet of office/re- tail space. The City wail require mat Phase II undergo complete environmen- tal�� / and land use review at the time of application submittal. The projects have been allowed to be separated because the phases are not functionally interde- Subscribed and sworn before me this 4 t h day of Dec . 19 9 0 pendent. The project is located at Renton Village Center/South Grady Way. This decision will be finalized in fifteen (15) days. Written comments received after 5:00 p.m., December 12, 1990 will not be //�� considered.A fourteen(14)day appeal peri- od will commence following the finalization of DNS-M. The mitigation measures Notary Public for the State of Washington imposed by the City of Renton's Environ- mental Review Committee are available at residing at Atthuff; the Development Services Division, Third King County, Washington Floor, Municipal Building, Renton,Washing- ton 98055. Phone: 235-2550. VDN#87 Revised 4/89 Published in the Valley Daily News November 27, 1990. 4980#51067 NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated for the following project(s) under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code. VILLAGE PLACE NORTH ECF;SA;CU;V-078-90 Applicant seeks: 1) site plan approval for development of a new 260,363 square foot office/retail sales building (with a conditional use permit to address the fact that this complex, proposed to be ten stories/133 feet in height will exceed the height limit allowed for the structure under the Zoning Ordinance); 2) site plan approval for construction of a five level (1396 space) parking garage to supplement the existing 261 spaces to be retained; 3) site plan approval for renovation (including partial demolition) of an existing retail center now on the subject property and for renovation of services areas; and 4) a variance for the construction of a new private roadway to serve the development. The proposed development also Includes improvements to existing on-site amenities (e.g., landscaping, ingress/egress routes, and parking). A second phase:pf this project is to be proposed for development at a future date; this phase is tentativeiy'platined to Include 115,000 square feet of office/retail space. The City will require that Phase II undergo complete environmental and land use review at the time of application submittal. The projects have been allowed to be separated because the phases are not functionally Interdependent. The project is located at Renton Village Center/South Grady Way. This decision will be finalized in fifteen (15) days. Written comments received after 5:00 p.m., December 12, 1990 will not be considered. A fourteen (14) day appeal period will commence following the finalization of DNS-M. The mitigation measures imposed by the City of Renton's Environmental Review Committee are available at the Development Services Division, Third Floor, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington 98055. Phone: 235-2550. Publication Date: November 27, 1990 Account No. 51067 pubnol • • F PLANNING• BUILDING PUBLIC WO:.:: . : :<•:•>::;.::::. ..:• VIRONIVIEN7J�L�RBVIEW �.O11�IVIT'1` .:..::..::.. ..�:.:. .:.� :.>:.:::.::.: A ::•:::::Ap.pL1CANT,:.:::::::::::::::<:.::.::::;::.::::•:::::.�:::::::.:::::.den..:>.::.::.:..�.g'..::.•:<•:.>:.>::•:.>:.::::::::::•:::::::::::::::::::::...:::.::::.::..�:::.;'::...:'.:.:... ::�:: :::V�ila e:Piace:No.h........:::::::::::.................:.:.::•.�:.:.:.:.:.:.:.•::.�:.•::.:•:.•. E TAL:.:FiECKLIS7::�'::::::�:�:: :::::ECF;S.A,C:.:,::::Q.7...$.::0.:.. :• :::.: .. • . . :>:.:.:::•.�::::::::::::::::::;.:.::.>::.>:.>:.:.: .......... I. I ..:.:�.:•:..:.:...:....�.:.:.�....:.:................:.. ........:.�.::.::::::.::::::.�::::::.:::::::::::::::::::.:::.::.:�:>::.::::::;:::::::..�:: v .. �l?�� L::.:::::::::::•..:a ficant.:::.see{s� ��� <•:)�::.:s:te.:•>:•:P:::t?•:;•>:•::pp..�;::.:.::..:::»:.;:.:.:•.�. t f::: :;n w:>2 363:>s. uare:foot;:.office/setail;:;sales;bulidin9.:(with;.a..eondi..io;:a..:<u$e:: :>::?::»::>::::::::d.eyelo men..v .a..::e:::::..60,:..........G....::..::.•::..::..::.•::..::.............:•::::::�::::...:> •::::>;.:.:..�:.:: : ....•. :::.::<..:.:: •::.:•;:". ..:::. •: ;:::;::<;.•::.::...:.,.::. .::.:.. .::.s :.::.::.•::..:.. .::..:.:. .. :.;.::.•::.p•:.•::...::..�.:.:.::.:•:.::d to:b :ten:::stori.es/133.::feet.in:;height will::: r it:l ; ddress::the•:fact•:.that:this:campiex,Proposed.::.::..;:.a>:.:.: ...;::.:•;:.:::.;::: :. .::•:;:.::.::::>:.:.:'::::>;.::•::<•:.:::::::.;:: :.imit:: llow :•for:::the:;structure::under.;:the Zoning::Ord nance, );;site p an:; : : <: ><: :axceed::the height.:i::...::::a::::::.:ed.:•: .... :.:.. :::.:.>:.::::.:.::::::: ..;: :::::;:::::: ::>::::: ;f r: st ti n;of:.a:flve:.level:: 1.3.9G;space):par ing garage to supplement the:ex isting :.::•::::;::.;:.:;:•:::apP.r..oval.::o::GQ:n...:>rt!c.::Q::•..::.,;:::<.:::�•>:.::.::•;�.::::::�::::<::<•::.:;•:'::':�::.:�: :.:;.: ... . t n .. :: ate.: lari:a . Koval::for.renovatign;;:(!ne�udin9Partia!<dei?.oliti9nl o.: :>:>:::>:;:::26.1:$paces to:be:>re.:al.:.ed,:3).:$..::.•:p::';:;��•�i?P:::>::.;:•::• :::::<:::>::::::;::;<:..::.;:::isti•:>:;:;:.tail:::::..::.•:'.•,•.:::.,:•:..::.:>..::.:: •.::..sill a ...::..nov i n::: f> leis:ices areas, and: :�;:: ::: :::>::>::>:an..e. lstin9:re..all:c...n::.................:::.:..::..::...:..::.1............�.;::::::;::::::.::. .::....::..::.:::.:>: :.::.>..:. .;:. ::. .>:;::.:.:.:::.:..:::••:::.:. �..::.. :::<:;:::::: ::>::::::>:::.:::::::::::::>::::':::•:•::.::•>:::'•;:.:•:;: ::;.: <•:•;:•:::.:::•:>:•c •:.•,:..::: ::::.. :..::.:...:::.:ivat.:.;...adwa t :> v I ment;<::The::: ::::::>:::: ::::>:4;:a:>variance.fo.::t.:e:e..ns............:.�:.::.�:.�:..::.•::::.........:.::::::»>:::::::�:::.... :.. ::.�::.::.;.:.:.:....�;•::.>::.;'.:.;:.:�::: :.::.•.�:..::.::�>:: :<:::::::: ::<: : ro osed:::::.de..e:op.::e::X:.::..:s•.::......:..::.::.�:...:..:...:p:....... .:::.:.::::.:::::::::..::...�:�;:::..::..::..:..::..::....::::::::::::: ... . .... :.. re s: .::::•:;.;::<•>:.:>::.::.:routes,.:.::.:.:;:.:::::>:.>::•:::::a.:�:::::::::.;::::.:.::.::•.:p.::.�:.�..97..;:. .�:..::..:::.... :<:: ;a sell .s.:::::::.:.:...�.:•:..:..::.:..:.:::... :... .::.:•:.:..;. • �.:. .::..:: :•::: :. ..:.:: .:.. �.:ro•..::..:::.:. .�.�;level+��.:mint.a..aiu:ur..e:da ..r....:.:..:P.:..:.:::::•.•::.: ................. . >Q.:.;:.'�;:•:;:•�::.:•:p:.:.;:.:::.•::.:.:::::>:;;:.::.:;:.::....:::::.....:::... .:::::::::.................:.:..:�•::pill.: .. .. . .. •.n I•` :1;1 � Q s uare�:feetofoffica/retail;;spaceTi?.e;:city;wjll.;iequ.rQ •.:::•::>::::::::•::::;.: ;• �.:::.:;:•>:.. ..:::::.. ;:..•: sill:;.: >::::::::;:::;:::::: :.:::a;>''':::<:::::::.:.: ::.:.... .�:...:::•:.•.o•,.•p:lies..;::.: :..•. •.::..•:.:n :. ::,...•d rev:•w>at;:the'time:.o..applcatsvial: .�.::::�:.�.�:.:•. t�:F?ha :Ii::: nder o:::vom lets::env�ronmentai:;and:la.<,d:use:.>.e..»e:�::.::;;;:.::>:.:.:;.:<•;>::.>:.:::.:::.:�:<:.::.;:•::.::<�•:.::::;�:.: <:::: >:. ::;::: :;.>'>'•:.>:.:::...;. ;:»:. .:.:.:.;•::::.. :.::..:.:.; ...... :.. .e .>:.. ..w ;::t :::: ::> a arated because:::the::::phased::are;:;nsot::. ::.;:.::•su t t.:.�:Th.e�. roeats:have:::been;:;alto.::ad::::9::be..:'s�:�A::•:.�:::::::.�:.:::..::..::.•::..:.........::.::.;:::::::::::::::.:.....:... ........... .• :interde .•. . .........::•:::::::::::::.:..............:..::..::..::..::..::..::...:::.:. ::::..::.:.:..::..::..::.:•:. :.::...::.::. :.:.::::.::.:•:.•::.:•. .... :R •nton'Viila• a Center.:South G►ady.:.•.ay::.:;.::;.>:.:::.>:.::•::•.: :..::.. ::>::>::::::::::.;:;:. : :A 1 � ' :.OF::PROPQ.SAL::���::�:: : <> :....:::.a. ..:::::... ...9..:..�:...:..::.�:�•:...:.:... ....:.:::::.::::::::::............:.:.�:..::.:•:.�:.� .......::.:.......:....:.:............. .................... 1 I. I. .. .ills..�.....:: ............. ..•..::......:.... .. a e.. . ........... ::............................................. .. ... .. ..............tiGs�:;:.:Land::>::U,s..:e,::.;::., ..:: .:............::'<:.:.::::.::.+..>:::::.;;:;.::;.;:.: :.::•::.:Tr ff ..Public..Services;:;UcII�t.:esF::�.ecreat:o.;.:::.::.:::.:::::::::.::.. n a. . . '• ••N•••••::•:: •••• • • • • •• ::•• $taf•••• •• vmme•.nd.>tha::.:::::::.: C.:....;.......::..::.::...:..::..::..:::...::..::... �::> : :RE� � MENpA71C..5�..:z:::>::::>::<::::::::::::: >::•.... .. ... ....::.:•:..::.:. .:..:..........:..:..::.:::..::::�:::.:...::........:. ..:..�:.:: •..::..::... • • ••• ••• • • ••••••••• • •• • n e f:No rnf�cance:::�:;Mitigated.::::l.::.;can...:..4:..:::.(..:.:::.... . .........:.....................:::::::::.............. ECrbN111AENDATIO . ...::::::::::::::::::::::::.:.......:.:.�::::..::..::..::..::.�:....:.:::::.::.::.:::.:>:.:•::::.::.:::::.:.:.�:::::::::.::::::::•::.::•.�:.:::::.:. TRANSPORTATION/PUBLIC SAFETY 4. The applicant, in order to address transportation system impacts, shall provide: a) Improvements to the south leg of the intersection of South Grady Way and Lake Avenue South, Including: ai designated travel lanes as presented on the site plans submitted by the applicant (dated October, 1990): and b) Improvements to signalization (e.g. equipment relocation) at the Grady Way/Lake Avenue intersection to ensure safe, efficient functioning of those designated travel lanes. These plans shall be approved to the satisfaction of the Transportation Systems Division prior to the Issuance of the first site preparation/building permits and all improvements are to be installed prior to the Issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy for the subject development. 5. The applicant, In order to address transportation system impacts, shall provide Improvements to street lighting (replacement of mercury vapor lighting units with sodium vapor units) along the south side of Grady Way South extending from Lake Avenue to the eastern boundary of the site,to the satisfaction of the Public Works Department, prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy for the subject development. 6. The applicant, in order to address transportation system impacts, shall be encouraged to make a voluntary contribution in the amount of $ j$ per trip/2873 trips) to the City as a fair share payment toward a City-sponsored study to: 1J determine the feasibility of improving the Grady Way eastbound right turn lane (to open this lane up to through traffic from Rainier Avenue to Talbot Road): and 2) determine the feasibility of improving the intersection of Talbot Road South/South Grady Way, through channelization improvementsje.g., curbs, signalization, elimination of.right turn trap at the south leg of the intersection'. This contribution should be provided to the satisfaction of the Transportation Systems Division, prior to the issuance of the first site preparation/building permits for the subject development. In the event that this study determines that the improvements are feasible, and the City elects to install roadway modifications, the applicant may be called upon to provide a fair share contribution to these improvements,with the ' cost of the study credited as a portion of the fair share.contribution. ** ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS Transportation Impacts: The Transportation Systems Division has Indicated that there could be significant impacts on the transportation system from this project (Phase I), and has identified the likelihood of additional Impacts from tentatively planned Phase II. To address some of the anticipated immediate project-related Impacts, the applicant did complete a traffic analysis for their proposal. This study recommended that the Intersection of S. Grady Way and Lake Avenue S. be enhanced with Improvements to the south leg of the intersection by widening it to allow two exclusive northbound left-turn lanes and a through right lane. The Transportation Systems Division supported these proposed improvements, and, in addition, advised that the applicant should provide a Transportation Plan for the Renton Village area(with the findings of that study to be incorporated Into the Grady Way TBZ prior to site plan approval). This supplementary study, including analyses of Impacts/improvements to the site and key local/regional roadways, has been provided as well by the applicant. Report findings and staff research has .Indicated a need for immediate Improvements and/or feasibility studies to determine the need for future Improvements to Grady Way, Talbot, Benson, Main Avenue, Lake Avenue and Rainier Avenue to accommodate the proposed complex. Those suggested improvements/studies will be established as environmental conditions for the project. Presently, the applicant is proposing the addition of 1396 new parking spaces (1297 for office use and 99 for retail use) and the retention of 261 existing retail use parking spaces, for a total of 1657 spaces. The Parking and Loading Ordinance would permit 1898 spaces for Phase I (1432 spaces for the office complex and 466 for retail use at the prescribed rate of 5.5 spaces per 1000 square feet of net usable area). Staff will call for twenty percent of the required spaces to be placed in reserve, including 93 spaces for . retail consumers/visitors (garage and open area) and 286 spaces for office employees(from the top levels of the garage). Reserve spaces will need to be landscaped. Signage will be provided to restrict retail/visitor parking to outside areas and lower garage levels; office employee will be provided on upper garage levels. All parking shall be appropriately signed. Retail/visitor parking shall be confined to two hours. Employee areas shall be secured and provided with lighting and emergency aid devices (e.g., phones). Handicapped parking shall be provided to comply with Code requirements. Impacts and mitigation measures for Phase II of this office/retail complex will be considered at the time of application for that complex. Mitigation Measures: See Recommendations#3-#9.. • Policy Nexus: Capital Improvements Plan, Streets and Arterials Plan; Grady Way TBZ; Environmental Review Ordinance,4-6 Village Place North Renton Village Associates November 20, 1990 by Clinton E. Morgan 1. Mitigation fee for the Grady Way Transportation Benefit Zone (TBZ) is as follows: Office Portion: 283,158 sq ft x $152.00 per trip Estimated trips: Ln(T) = .75 Ln(a) + 3.77 Ln(T) = 0.75 Ln (283,158) + 3.77 Ln(T) = 0.75 (5.65) + 3.77 Ln(T) = 4.23 + 3.77 T = e8 T = 2,994.41 trips on 10.58 trip rate per 1,000 sq. ft. Retail Portion: Retail space is being reduced below it's present level by a minus (-121) vehicle trip Therefore, total project trip increase is as follows: 2,994.41 - 121 = *2.873.41 total trips $152.00 x 2,873.41 = $436,758.32 Total Grady Way South TBZ Mitigation Fee is: $43758.32 2. Sidewalks to be provided on Grady Way abutting property frontage. 3. Intersection of South Grady Way and Lake Avenue South provide traffic improvement to south leg of intersection as proposed in traffic study. Widen south leg to allow two exclusive northbound left-turn lanes and a through right lane. Intersection design to meet City standards and traffic signal revised. 4. As indicated in the traffic study, a Transportation Management Plan to be developed for the new office/retail space. Village Place North It Page 2 Requested items not part of TBZ. 5. Grady Way South - Main Avenue South to Rainier: Street lighting level needs to be up graded by replacement of mercury vapor lighting units with sodium vapor units. 6. Grady Way eastbound right turn lane - Rainier to Talbot Road: Provide feasibility study to determine the advantage of opening right turn lane to through traffic. 7. Benson Road South/Main Avenue South/Grady Way intersection service level F - northbound leg of intersection: Feasibility study and cost estimate needs to be provided for adding a northbound through lane at the approach to the intersection. 8. Intersection of Talbot Road South and South Grady Way: Examine channelization improvements for the southbound through movement in conjunction with elimination'a r ht turn``trap pasted the south leg of intersection. v,J 90-432:CEM:pa C, h CC: Gregg Zimmerman - • • .• • EIAL IT:TP • •:•: ::• :• : : ""'"":." ":". •"."•"."•"." •" ****••"..." A. BACKGROUND. APPLICANT Renton Village Associates ••••••••••••••••• ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• •••••• ••• ••••••• •• •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• ••••• • •••••••• PFOJCT4 Village Place North DE$CRIPTION OF PROPOSAL Applicant ek 1)site plan approval for development of a new 260368 square foot office/retail sales building (with a conditional use permit to addressthe faqtthatthis complex, proposed to be ten stories/i33 feet in heightwill exceed the height limit allowed fr the structure under the Zoning Ordinance 2) site plan approval for construction of a five level (1396 space) parking garage to supplement the existing 261 spaces t be retained, 3) site plan approval for renovation (including partial demolition) of an existing retail centor now on the subject property and for renovation of services areas and 4) variance for the construction of a new private roadway to serve the development Ths proposed development ls includes improvements to existing on-site amenities (a g landscaping ingress/egress routes and parking) A second phase of this project i to be proposed for development at a future date,this phase is tentatively planned t Include 11S,000 square feet of office/retail space The City will require that Phase II undergo complete environmental and land use revIew at the time of application submittaL The projects have been allowed to be separated because the phases are not functionally ......................................................................................... • •: " :•• • •:: :::::•.•:,•.:• • •••••• • • . ."" " """" " " • • • ••• • •• . •• •• •.......... LOCATION OF PROPOSAL Rentc'n Village Center/South Grady Way ISSUES4 Aesthtics) Laid Use0 Noise Light/Glare, Earth, • RECOMM '1LATION$. staff recommenf that the RC issue a Determination • • • • • • ' Environmental Review ComriutLee Staff Report Village Place North • November 21, 1990 Page 2 • ..............���:�NI1CIl�NDATION.S:;:.::.�::::.::�::::.:�:::.::�:..�::.:.:.:::::::::.>.>:<:::>::.� ....................... ....... ...... .............. ..... .................. ......................... ..... ................ ............. .. ... .... .. . ............. ... . ... • AESTHETICS 1. The applicant shall, in order to address aesthetic impacts, revise the landscape plan to include more significant landscaping around the southwestern facade of the five story parking garage in order to soften its apparent bulk, with a conceptual plan to be approved to the satisfaction of the Planning/Building/Public Works Department and the Fire Department prior to public hearing for site plan/conditional use review and a specific plan to be approved to the satisfaction of the Planning/Building/Public Works Department and the Fire Department prior to issuance of site preparation/building permits and with landscaping to be installed prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. • LIGHT AND GLARE • 2. The applicant shall, in order to address light/glare impacts, prepare a solar glare diagram for those hours of the day on the equinox, summer, and winter solstices when the angle of reflected sunlight is at an angle of 30 degrees or less with the horizon, in order that staff can ascertain whether reflected glare.Is likely to impact 1-405 or Grady Way traffic. This diagram shall be submitted to the Development Planning Section at least two weeks prior to public hearing, so that staff can ascertain whether mitigation measures should be recommended to the Hearing Examiner for light/glare management. TRANSPORTATION/PUBLIC SAFETY 3. The applicant, in order to_ address transportation system impacts, shall: a) directly provide improvements.proposed for the Grady Way Benefit Zone, to the satisfaction of the Transportation Systems Division, prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy for this development; OR b) make a contribution of $436,758.32 to the (pending) Grady Way Transportation Benefit • Zone, prior to the issuance of site preparation/building permits. • 4. The applicant, in order to address transportation system impacts, shall provide improvements to the south leg of the intersection of South Grady Way and Lake Avenue South, as proposed in the Traffic Study provided for this project by Transpo in October, 1988, 'to the satisfaction of the, Transportation Systems Division, prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy for the subject development. 5. The applicant, in order to address transportation system impacts, shall provide improvements to street lighting (replacement of mercury vapor lighting units with sodium vapor units) along Grady Way South extending from Main Avenue South to Rainier Avenue, to the satisfaction of the Department, prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy for the subject development. 6. The applicant, in order to address transportation system impacts, shall provide a study to determine the feasibility of improving the Grady Way eastbound right turn lane (to open this lane up to through traffic from Rainier Avenue to Talbot Road), to the satisfaction of the Transportation Systems Division, prior to the issuance of the first site preparation/building permit for the subject development. In the event that this study determines that the improvement is feasible, and the City elects to install roadway modifications, the applicant will be called upon to provide a fair share contribution to this improvement,with the cost of the study credited as a portion of the fair share contribution. • 7. The applicant, in order to address transportation system impacts, shall provide a study to determine the feasibility of improving the intersection of Talbot Road South/South Grady Way, through channelization Improvements (e.g., curbs, signalization, elimination of right turn trap at the south leg of the intersection),to the satisfaction of the Transportation Systems Division,.prior to the issuance of the first site preparation/building permits for the subject development. In the event that this study determines that the improvement is feasible, and the City elects to install roadway modifications, the applicant will be called upon to provide a fair share contribution to this improvement,with the cost of the study credited as a portion of the fair share contribution. 8. The applicant shall, in order to address transportation system impacts, provide a Transportation Management Plan, including (but not limited to): a) provision of van pool/car pool systems, preferential parking for HOVs, fee-for-parking plan for employees, subsidized bus passes, public transit and ride-sharing information materials, a bus shelter, "kiss-and-ride" facilities, bicycle lanes, bicycle parking plans, and a fair share contribution to a study exploring the feasibility of implementing a shuttle service to the site from the local residential•community; b) a system/fees for monitoring of the TMP to determine its level of functioning and to make necessary Environmental Review Comr..___e Staff Report Village Place North November 21, 1990 Page 3 modifications (such as relocation of preferential parking); and c) an implementation schedule to serve the new office/retail complex. Facilities plans shall be developed to the satisfaction of the Planning/Building/Public Works Department and METRO, prior to issuance of site preparation/building permits. Service plans shall be developed to the satisfaction of the Planning/Building/Public Works Department and METRO, prior to issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy. Facilities and services shall be implemented at the time of occupancy of the first structure. (Note 8.1: If, after having had in place an effective TMP for two years, the applicant can demonstrate the need for additional parking, he can request release of the reserved parking. It shall be the responsibility of the Planning/Building/Public Works Administrator to release sections or all of the parking places held in reserve.) 9. The applicant shall, in order to address transportation system impacts and public safety, provide a parking plan which includes, but is not limited to: a) placement of twenty percent of the 1432 parking spaces required for the office facility In reserve (with the reserve parking spaces to be shelled off on the top level of the parking garage); b) reserved parking areas on the roof of the garage, with landscaping, seating and a jogging trail in those reserved areas); c) establishment of a system for assigning parking for retail consumers, vendors and visitors to the office complex to outside areas and the lower level of the garage, with signage indicating those spaces which are so reserved and restricting parking to specified periods; d) construction of load/unload areas next to the,skybridge at the second level of the garage; e) establishment of a system for assigning upper levels of the garage to employees, with signage indicating those areas which are so reserved, and with a security system (controlled access, lighting, emergency service phones, etc.); and f) provision of a total of 29 handicapped parking stalls to serve employees, consumers and visitors -- with those spaces serving the office building to be adjacent to the skybridge and those spaces serving the retail area to be immediately adjacent to the retail center. These plans shall be established in concept, to the satisfaction of Planning/Building/Public Works, the Police Department and the Fire Department, prior to the public hearing for site plan/conditional use review. Specific plans shall be approved to the satisfaction of Planning/Building/Public Works,the Police Department and the Fire Department, prior to the issuance of site preparation/building permits, and shall be installed prior to issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy. (NOTE 9.1: The applicant is encouraged to install a hydraulic elevator in the parking garage for the convenience/safety of employees,visitors and vendors.) EARTH 10. The applicant shall, in order to address impacts to earth and storm water management impacts, develop a storm drainage plan and flood protection plan (including elevation of all structures a minimum of two feet above the flood plain and providing compensatory water storage areas on site), based upon the Surface and Storm Water Management Ordinance. The conceptual storm water management plan must be submitted at least two weeks prior to the public hearing for the project and approved by the Storm Water Engineering Section in advance of that hearing. A specific storm water management plan shall be approved by the Storm Water Engineering Section prior to Issuance of site preparation/building permits. • (Note 10.1: The applicant may elect to address storm drainage management exclusively through on-site retention/detention or may develop a plan for routing water to the Panther Creek Wetlands. If the wetlands are to receive water from this site,the plan for conveyance and/or deposit must be approved by the State Departments of Fisheries and Ecology, the Army Corps and related agencies. The Storm Water Engineering Section will take responsibility for coordination of plan • review with federal, state and local agencies, as necessary.) 11. The applicant shall, in order to address impacts to earth and storm water management, provide a "hold harmless" agreement which acknowledges that the City has informed the applicant that the subject property is located in an area which may be included in an existing/altered 100 year flood plain, and that the applicants have decided to proceed, at their own volition, thereby waiving their rights to hold the municipality liable for any flooding and/or for any damages to property or person arising from such flooding. This document is to be approved by the Storm Water Engineering Section and the City Attorney, and to be duly recorded prior to the issuance of site preparation/building permits. RECREATION 12. The applicant shall, in order to address on-site recreation Impacts, provide a plan for Interior recreation areas (with shower facilities in the office/retail building, for use by employees ). This plan shall be approved, in concept, by Planning/Building/Public Works prior to public hearing for • Environmental Review Committee Staff Report Village Place North • November 21, 1990 • Page 4 • • project review. Specific plans shall be approved by the Planning/Building/Public Works Department, prior to issuance of site preparation/building permits; facilities shall be installed prior to issuance'of a Certificate of Occupancy for the building. • • 13. The applicant shall, in order to address community recreation impacts, ,provide: a) a plan for' development and Implementation of off-site recreation improvements to the satisfaction of the Parks and Recreation Department; OR b) make a voluntary contribution of $20,000.00 to the development of community recreational facilities (Comprehensive Parks Plan, Master Trails Plan), in order to mitigate recreation Impacts. In the event that the applicant opts to provide off-site improvements directly, these shall be installed prior to issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy. In the event that the applicant prefers to make a contribution, fees.shall be provided. prior to issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy. CONSTRUCTION • 14. The applicant shall develop a Construction Management Mitigation Plan that addresses: a) hours ' of operation, b) hauling routes, c) staging areas, d) employee and contractor parking, e) erosion control,f) the disposal of hazardous materials associated with soils remediation/construction, and g) signage identifying construction areas in order to facilitate timely provision of emergency services. A conceptual plan shall be submitted at least two weeks in advance of public hearing for • the complex, and shall be approved by the Planning/Building/Public Works Department and Fire Prevention Bureau prior to that hearing. Specific plans shall be approved by the Planning/Building/P.ublic Works Department and the Fire Prevention Bureau prior to issuance of site preparation/building permits. . • (NOTE: In conjunction with land use review, staff may recommend modifications to site plans and landscaping plans to achieve kill compliance with Code requirements and additional conditions to ensure adequate functioning of the development (e.g., covenant for joint use of parking areas and amenities, landscaping maintenance bonds.) (NOTE: The applicant will be required to make all Code mandated off-site and on-site improvements, • including sidewalks, curbs, gutters, street lighting, utility lines, and utility system fees prior to issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy.) • • LAND USE • 1. Whether the proposed development is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan? • The proposed renovation and development of an office/retail complex complies with the Comprehensive Plan Map .designation of "Commercial Use" for the subject. site, and is in compliance with relevant Goals, Policies and Objectives for commercial and office'developments (e.g., Policy V.A.3. which encourages clustered development, V.A.4. which calls for commercial developments to be located to minimize travel/traffic congestion;V.A.7.which calls for commercial areas to be compatible with adjacent land uses; and V.A.9 which calls for a variety of goods and services to be available within a commercial area). 2. Whether the proposed development is consistent with the Land Use Map designation? The proposed development complies with the Land Use Map designation for"Commercial Use" (B- 1). 3. Whether the proposed development (including new construction and renovations) is consistent with the Zoning Ordinance and other applicable regulations/standards? • The proposed complex generally complies with applicable development standards for the Commercial Zone, as well as those regulations established in the Landscaping Ordinance and the Parking and Loading Ordinance. Because the proposed office tpwer is planned to be 133 feet in height, exceeding the existing height limit of 95 feet in the B-1 zone by approximately 38 feet, the project must be considered as a conditional use; as submitted this structure generally complies with standards established under the Conditional Use Ordinance. • ' • • Environmental Review Committee Staff Report Village Place North November 21, 1990 Page 5 • Additionally, the proposed renovation of the existing commercial center and construction of a parking garage generally are consistent with criteria established for site plan approval. The proposed private roadway generally is consistent with criteria established under the Variance Ordinance. 4., Whether the proposed development is consistent with vicinity land uses?' The subject property is currently developed with commercial and office uses, as is property to the south, east and west of the site. Property to the north of the site is currently zoned L-1 and developed with a Metro Park and Ride Lot. The site is convenient to major City arterials, a state roadway, and 1-405. In addition,the site is close to SeaTac and the Renton Municipal Airport. Staff believe that the proposed action is consistent with surrounding land uses and would enhance the image and character of the surrounding area. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Whether the applicant has adequately identified and addressed the following environmental impacts likely to occur in conjunction with the proposed development? a. Land Use Impacts: The subject proposal for some 260,363 square feet of new, net rentable office space and approximately 13,650 square feet of new retail space on the first floor, as well as some 79,000 square feet of remodeled space will, when combined with the office and retail space already on the Renton Village Shopping Center site, help anchor this southern edge of the downtown as a strong commercial and retail node. Although on the edge of the downtown proper, this node should help stabilize the commercially designated (Comprehensive Plan) and/or zoned properties to the north. The proposed office tower itself would house approximately 800 to 1,000 new employees who would be likely to at least occasionally take advantage of other retail uses and services in the area. It is also possible that some retail activity could be drawn away from the existing core into this area because of its more readily available off-street parking, more contemporary image,and critical mass. The construction of parking facilities (and an access roadway) will increase accessibility of the center, and make it more convenient for consumers to use. A second,future, phase of this office/retail complex is tentatively planned to be located on the site. The second phase may include 100,000 gsf of office over 15,000 gsf of retail space. Approximately 35,000 gsf of retail space, now occupied by Ernst,would be demolished to make way for this building, resulting In a net reduction.of 20,000 gsf of retail space. The second phase is anticipated to necessitate the provision of 587 additional parking spaces. Mitigation Measures: Because no specific adverse environmental impacts on land use have been identified, specific land use related mitigation measures have not been recommended. • Policy Nexus: Not applicable. b. Aesthetics Impacts: The subject proposal, as noted above, includes plans for a new 10 story, mixed- use, office/retail building and a five story parking garage designed to accommodate 930 parking spaces. Aesthetically, the new office building should be an attractive addition to the downtown, using a combination of painted concrete spandrels and bluish green tinted glazing, and porcelain tiles as an accent material for exterior surfaces at ground level and at the top of the building. To add visual interest, the northwest corner of the building has been articulated In planes so that it breaks away from the standard rectilinear form of most contemporary office buildings. This, along with a somewhat sculpted top two floors, and an articulated first floor featuring a recessed arcade on the east face of the building, and a plaza on the south, should make this new building one of the more attractive buildings in the City. S Environmental Review COmI,,..iae Staff Report Village Place North November 21, 1990 Page 6 The proposed new five-story parking garage is planned to be over 480 feet long along its eastern facade. This feature poses an architectural challenge with respect to the desirability of breaking down the apparent bulk of this large structure and integrating it thematically with the more suburban scale found elsewhere in the center. The architects for this project have attempted to decrease the perception of the mass of the garage by indenting the corners of the structure which are closest to Grady Way, introducing some slight (depth wise) 30 plus feet wide recessed areas and stairwells, as well as employing different materials and textures along different portions of the garage's facades. Along the street sides of the garage, larger(14-20 foot high, 4-6 inch caliper)trees are proposed to soften the "view from the street". The southwestern and eastern facades of the garage will be more visible as smaller sized (2 inch caliper) street trees, 30 feet on center, are proposed to mask the south end of the garage and only a narrow row of shrubs are proposed to screen the garage along its eastern facade. It should be noted that approximately two thirds of this latter facade will be screened by the ten story office building, some 50 feet to its east. Some landscaping (11 flowering cherry trees, of 2 inch caliper) is also proposed for the roof of the garage. In addition to these major new structures, approximately 11,000 square feet. of new retail space is proposed in two new retail centers that will abut either side of a new pedestrian pathway that connects the new office building to the other major office buildings on the campus. The two new smaller retail areas will be centrally located (at the north end of Pay-N-Save and the south end of Thriftway). In addition to this new addition, the front of the existing stores (including Schumskys Restaurant) will be faced with a new colonnaded arcade that will thematically match the design features to be installed at the ground level of the new office building. Staff believe that the office and retail portions of the project interface effectively, based upon thematic integrity of design features. As noted above, the office building is likely to be an attractive addition to the City's skyline, as well. Only the existing Ernst store and the parking garage would appear to have the distinction of not thematically "fitting in" -- it would seem reasonable that a colonnaded arcade similar to that in front of Pay-N-Save, could be used to better integrate the Ernst store into the whole complex. The parking garage, because of its very dissimilar use, different floor to ceiling heights, and different engineering requirements, will be more difficult to integrate "aesthetically". There is little that can be done, other than additional landscaping and some possibly greater articulation around the stairwells, to dramatically change the appearance of the parking garage. Mitigation Measures: See Recommendation#1 Policy Nexus: Environmental Review Ordinance, 4-6 c. Noise, Light and Glare Impacts: Other than during the construction phase, impacts from noise associated with the proposed use are not expected to be great. Since there is an adjacent hotel, construction hours should be limited to regular working hours to protect the privacy of hotel guests. Reflective glare from the proposed 10-story office building is not expected to be readily visible from major arterials or 1-405 where it could impact the vision of motorists. However, to confirm this, the applicant needs to prepare a reflective glare diagram for those hours and times of the year when reflective glare is likely to be visible from the building. (This effect will occur when the angle of the reflected sunlight is 30 degrees or less with the horizon). Construction related light and glare, if known, should be mitigated. On site lighting will be screened to be retained on site. Mitigation Measures: See Recommendation#2. Policy Nexus: Environmental Review Ordinance, 4-6 d. Transportation Impacts: The Transportation Systems Division has indicated that there could be significant Impacts on the transportation system from this project (Phase I), and has identified the likelihood of additional impacts from tentatively planned Phase II. Environmental Review Committee Staff Report Village Place North November 21, 1990 Page 7 To address some of the anticipated immediate project-related impacts, the applicant did complete a traffic 'analysis'for their proposal. This study recommended that the intersection of S. Grady Way and Lake Avenue S. be enhanced with improvements to the south leg of the intersection by widening It to allow two exclusive northbound left-turn lanes and a through right lane. The Transportation Systems Division supported these proposed improvements, and, in addition, advised that the applicant should provide a Transportation Plan for the Renton Village area (with the findings of that study to be incorporated into the Grady Way TBZ prior to site plan approval). This supplementary study, including analyses of impacts/improvements to the site and key local/regional roadways,has been provided as well by the applicant. Report findings and staff research has Indicated a need for Immediate improvements and/or feasibility studies to determine the need for future improvements to Grady Way, Talbot, Benson, Main Avenue, Lake Avenue and Rainier Avenue to accommodate the proposed complex. Those suggested improvements/studies will be established as environmental conditions for the project. Presently, the applicant Is proposing the addition of 1396 new parking spaces (1297 for office use and 99 for retail use) and the retention of 261 existing retail use parking spaces, for a total of 1657 spaces. The Parking and Loading Ordinance would permit 1898 spaces for Phase I (1432 spaces for the office complex and 466 for retail use at the prescribed rate of 5.5 spaces per 1000 square feet of net usable area). Staff will call for twenty percent of the required spaces to be placed in reserve, including 93 spaces for retail consumers/visitors (garage and open area) and 286 spaces for office employees (from the top levels of the garage). Reserve spaces will need to be landscaped. Signage will be provided to restrict retail/visitor parking to outside areas and lower garage levels; office employee will be provided on upper garage levels. All parking shall be appropriately signed. Retail/visitor parking shall be, confined to two hours. Employee areas shall be secured and provided with lighting and emergency aid devices (e.g., phones). Handicapped parking shall be provided to comply with Code requirements. Impacts and mitigation measures for Phase II of this office/retail complex will be considered at the time of application for that complex. Mitigation Measures: See Recommendations#3-#9.. Policy Nexus: Capital Improvements Plan, Streets and Arterials Plan; Grady Way TBZ; Environmental Review Ordinance,4-6 e. Public Services/Utilities (1) Emergency Services Impacts: The subject proposal is not anticipated to have significant adverse impacts on fire service resources, if built pursuant to Code (including "high rise" requirements), Modifications to initial information/plans provided by the applicant have allayed Fire Prevention Bureau concerns with respect to • emergency access. Police have reviewed the project and believe that more information is needed on the security provisions that will be in place in the parking garage to ensure security. Staff are recommending that security provisions acceptable to the Police Department be established prior to the public hearing for site plan approval for this • project. Mitigation Measures: See Recommendation#9. Policy Nexus: Environmental Review Ordinance, 4-6 (2) Storm Water Management Impacts: The proposed development can be incorporated into the existing storm , water management system, effectively, however special measures (e.g., elevation of buildings, compensatory flood storage, hold harmless agreements) may be required to achieve the necessary levels of service to the development and necessary levels of protection to the subject property (and neighboring sites) as a result of the fact that portions of the site area subject to flooding during the rainy season. • . Environmental Review Committee Staff Report Village Place North November 21, 1990 Page 8 • • Mitigation Measures: See Recommendations#10 and #11. Policy Nexus: Environmental Review Ordinance, 4-6; Storm Water and Surface Water Drainage Management Ordinance. • (3) Recreation • Impacts: The subject property is proximate to passive recreation activities (e.g., picnic tables, movie theaters) on (or adjacent to) this site. Additionally, Burnett Linear Park Is nearby. In order to ensure an adequate range and quantity of recreational opportunities to employees and users of the Center,the applicant has proposed a one-quarter mile long walking/jogging path around the parking structure which is to include a couple of stretching and exercising stations. Staff believe that the applicant should be asked to provide an indoor exercise room and shower facilities for future employees (at site plan review) and to make contributions (through direct improvement or funds) to the improvement of regional recreation facilities. • Mitigation.Measures: See Recommendations#12 and #13. • Policy Nexus: Environmental Review Ordinance, 4-6; Comprehensive Parks Plan. f. Construction • Impacts: Standard construction impacts are anticipated in conjunction with proposed demolition, renovation and development of new buildings. Particular care will be needed to mitigate noise, traffic, dust and debris Impacts to persons working on/using "functioning" portions of the subject development, and to those travelling to and from nearby office and commercial facilities. Also, particular care will need to be exercised in removal of underground oil/fuel tanks (and any necessary resultant soils remediation) from the Gull Station on this site. Mitigation Measures: See Recommendation#14. Policy Nexus: Environmental Review Ordinance, 4-6 :4:: '`::: : I. MIE:N7ra.:OF:I u(EiNI ]G.D...f�AATH►1...N....................:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::.:..............................::::. `arm LAND USE • Police Department: See attached memo. • Fire Prevention Bureau: Must comply and be constructed to high rise requirements. Fire ,flow of 1,500 is required. Two hydrants with a minimum flow of 1,000 gpm is required. • Primary hydrant Is to be 150' of structure. Secondary • hydrants are to be 300' of structure. All other normal code requirements are necessary. Transportation Systems: See attached memo. Parks and Recreation: Development should include participation in a voluntary recreational Improvements in the area. Note; These improvements will serve users and employees of the building. Sewer Utilities: 1) Drawings shall be 22"x 34", scale 1" = 20'for all utility plans. 2) Applicant must obtain easement releases for water lines & sewer lines in easements which are to be abandoned and/or removed. 3) Gull oil stn tank removal and soil remediation must be completed. 4) All covered levels in parking garage will be drained to sanitary sewer. Environmental Review ComrtnLtee Staff Report Village Place North November 21, 1990 Page 9 Install oil/water separator with bypass sized to handle garage fireflow. 5) Side sewers must have minimum 2% slope (1%slope for 8"sewers). Storm Water: 1) The drainage plans for this proposal shall comply with the core and special requirements contained in Section 1.2 and 1.3 of Chapter 1,the hydrologic analysis methods contained in Chapter 3, the hydraulic analysis and design methods contained in Chapter 4, and the erosion/sedimentation control plan and practices contained in Chapter 5 of the 1990 King County Surface Water Design Manual. 2) Downstream analysis will be required for the 36" existing storm line. 3) Site is in the 100-year floodplain as designated on FEMA map. 100- year water level Is elev. 24. FF elev. minimum 25, ok. 4) Analyze and mitigate impacts to the 100-year floodplain In this area. If water storage volume is removed from floodplain, compensatory storage must be added. 5) Parking area @ SE corner of site will require more catch basins. Min. 1% grade to CB in parking lots. 6) Intermediate manways in detention pipes shall not be placed in traffic areas. 7) Due to history of flooding on • this site, it would be beneficial to conduct a predesign meeting between City&applicant to address problems. Building Division: No Building code check done. Long Range Planning: Project supports intensification of existing office/commercial center. Building elevations are very unclear. What is the City getting if approve this project? ENVIRONMENTAL Police Department: Impact is tied to parking structure security and eventual tenants. Building may have only a minor impact, but that is impossible to determine at this point. • Fire Prevention Bureau: Minor impact to public services. Transportation Systems: This project, plus the potential for future projects, will have serious consequences for the transportation system. See attached review comments. Parks and Recreation: Recommend the proponent review the proposed Parks Comp Plan and Proposed Trails Master. Also the proponent speaks to a trail systems in the development and the plans do not show such. The Plaza area will serve the communities interest, i.e., restaurant. Recommend the proponent investigate the on-site and off-site impacts for the employees. The site is sufficient to incorporate an on-site trail and pedestrian system. Storm Water: 1) Project is in the 100-year floodplain, FEMA map designation AH, water level 24. 2) Site is not in sewer moratorium. 3) Site is in the Talbot Hill Collection Basin. 4)There is a 36"storm line @ SW corner of site. Building Division: Minor housing impact. Sewer Utilities: 1) Project is in the 100-year floodplain, FEMA map designation AH,water level 24. 2) Site Is not in the sewer moratorium. 3) Site is. not in APA zone. 4) Site is in Talbot Hill Collection "Basin. 5) Existing 8" sanitary sewers are available for connection throughout site. Water Utilities: Watermain improvements required are shown in orange highlight on attached water plan (Attachment #24). We • •- • Environmental Review Corn :e Staff Report Village Place North November 21, 1990 Page 10 recommend that applicant set up predesign meeting with Development Services prior to design of proposed utility system. • Long Range Planning: Project will have impacts upon views from surrounding • neighborhoods (significant?) and traffic. Traffic study looks good but should be verified by Traffic Engineering. High water table (7.5' see Geotech) seems to need special mitigation. Final approval of FAA would be good, only document on record seems to be a denial of earlier application. • • ityof. aio Re < > > >< . r�............................::.::.:::::::::::::::::.�:::::::.:::............... t MEET NG;NO C • November 21, 1990 • To: Lynn Guttmann, Planning/Building/Public Works Administrator John Webley, Community Services Administrator Lee Wheeler, Fire Chief Fror4 Don Erickson, Secretary :�Me�tiri :page:> :::�::> ::>�:.No embe�'. .. .. 99 ............:..:.::::::::::.::::::::::::::::::::::•::::::::::::.:::........................:..::.:.:.:.�:::;.�:,::: Floor:Conferente.Hoo ..............:.::.•:::::::::::;::::::::::.�:>:::::::::.::::..::.....:...........�.:.:.:�:�: Agenda attached below. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE • AGENDA NOVEMBER 21, 1990 Third Floor Conference Room Commencing at 10:00 AM • TIME/KEY PARTICIPANTS NEW • EAST VALLEY OFFICE CENTER, BLDG 3&4 ECF;SA-118-89 The applicant seeks site plan approval for an office park complex, Including two four-story office buildings, and attendant amenities (pedestrian plaza,• parking, landscaping)to be located on a vacant 14.47 acre parcel, zoned Office Park. The project is located at the intersection of East Valley Frontage Road and Lind Avenue. Building #3 will be addressed 1701 East Valley Frontage Road. Building #4 will be addressed 1700 Lind Avenue. BOEING 10-50 SKIN PANEL BLDG ECF-130-90 The applicant is proposing to construct a single-story, 279.5' X 51.6' (14,422.2 square foot) addition on to an existing building for the storage of skin-panels for aircraft. • The project Is located at the Boeing Facilities (10-50 Building) located on the east side of Park Ave. North and on the north side of the extension of North 8th Street. VILLAGE PLACE NORTH • • CU;ECF;SA;V-078-90 • Applicant proposes to construct a new 10-story . office/retail building requiring a Conditional Use Permit since building will exceed 95' in height. The proposal also includes renovation of existing retail center and existing drives, demolition of a portion of the existing retail, renovation of landscaping and lighting. A variance will also be needed to construct a new private street. The project is located at Renton Village Center,S. Grady Way. - ( Environmental Review Committee Meeting Notice November 21, 1990 Page 2 RABANCO/BLACK RIVER WASTE RECOVERY CENTER ECF-082-90 The applicant seeks approval to construct a 45,000 sq.ft. transfer station, on a 1305 acre site, including an 8 acre storage yard and a 1,800 ft. soil spur and two container storage areas of about 15,000 sq. ft. to handle CDL waste. The project initially expected to generate 450 (round trip) truck deliveries and departures per day and could impact city, county and state routes In the region. BOEING/LONGACRES Proposed 700,000 sq. ft. training and support facility and proposed Master Site Plan Request for this and future developments. The applicant requests an Issuance of a Determination of Significance per letter of November 13, 1990. • cc: J. Covington, Executive Assistant to the Mayor L.Warren, City Attorney F. Kaufman, Hearing Examiner 1 •t; Transportation and Traffic Engineering PLANNING • DESIGN The Transpo Group November 7, 1990 TG: 89463.03 crry OF RENTON RECEIVED Mr. Mel Wilson Transportation Systems Division ' v g ^ City of Renton Public Works ���° 200 Mill Avenue S DEVENoI.o - 8e°eribac: S Renton.WA 98055 DIVISION SUBJECT. VILLAGE PLACE NORTH OFFICE TRANSPORTATION IMPACT AND MITIGATION Dear Mr.Wilson: As requested during our meeting of September 25, 1990,we have reviewed the Grady Way TBD report to determine two things: (1)to determine if the current site buildout scenario exceeds the site buildout assumed in the transportation model for the Grady Way TBD and (2) to determine if the grade separation project for the Grady Way/Rainier Avenue intersec- tion could be broken into phases so that a portion of the improvement could be initially constructed to reduce traffic congestion. We also developed a mitigation plan for the inter- section of Grady Way at Benson/Main. . . Review of Site Buildout The project proponent has determined that, in addition to the Village Place North project, the site zoning will allow another mixed-use building to be constructed on site—probably at the existing Ernst location. This building could consist of approximately 100,000 gross square feet(gsf) of office over 15,000 gsf of retail space. Approximately 35,000 gsf of retail space would be demolished to make way for this building, resulting in a net reduction of 20,000 gsf of retail space. We have reviewed the trip-generation assumptions for the proposed Village Place North development and the adjacent, recently completed and future proposed activities in the area bounded by Grady Way,Talbot Road, I-405, and Rainier Avenue S. The purpose of the review was to update the estimate of vehicle trips which could be generated at full develop- ment of the area based on current proposals and to compare these estimates with the pro- jections made in 1987 as part of the Grady Way Study. The comparative development levels and trip-generation estimates for the traffic analysis zone in question are as shown in Table 1 below. 4. Tti_TnAroonn(`,,, i,,,, ..'NC n_1 n„a n.._.r n..:._.nn nnnn, rA vnncr7e-.nnnn nnelc in non+ • Mr. Mel Wilson The November 7, 1990 TranspoPage 2 Group Table 1. Comparative Trip Generation Previous Studyt Current Proposals Difference Office Buildings Square Feet 730,000 864,500 +18% Employees 2,600 3,030 +17% Vehicles Trips(daily) 9,200 10,320 +12% Retail Square Feet 105,000 96,000 -9% Employees 240 260 +8% Vehicle Trips(daily) 6,200 5,760 -7% Total Vehicle Trips(daily) 15,400 16,080 +4% 1 Grady Way Corridor Transportation Improvement Study Revised Draft Report,July 5, 1988,The TRANSPO Group. As shown in Table 1,while the level of development indicated by the current proposal will be somewhat greater and the trip generation somewhat higher than was projected for the subarea in the 1987 traffic study, the difference is not enough to justify an update of the traffic modeling and network assignments in the impacted area. From the above comparison(which excludes the Sheraton Hotel and the Cinema), it can be seen that the current proposal envisions a full development scenario for the area which includes more office space but less retail space than was assumed in the July 1988 Grady Way study. In terms of trip generation, these differences are partially offsetting with a net difference of about 4 percent, an amount we would not consider to be significant to justify an update of the traffic model. There are two characteristics of the development which,because of their affect on trip gen- eration, deserve brief mention. The first concerns the type of employment activity in the office space. The employment both in the esd.sting office space—Renton Place 1, 2, and 3— and the proposed office development in Village Place North consists of high-tech/engineering activities,which have a considerably lower trip-generation rate than would occur at a typi- cal suburban office building with a collection of diverse business activities. The trip- generation rate used for both scenarios in this analysis reflects this consideration. The second trip-generation characteristic concerns the retail activity proposed for develop- ment as part of Village Place North. Due to its location.this new retail development will likely draw a significant percentage of its customers from the occupants of the adjacent office buildings. These customers will arrive and depart as walk trips rather than vehicle trips. This consideration also has been taken into account in determining the vehicle trip- generation rate for the retail component of the proposed development. Mr.Mel Wilson The November?. 1990 ���� Page 3 po Group Review of Rainier Avenue S/ S Grady Way Improvements A grade separation structure has been proposed at the intersection which would almost double the capacity. The conceptual design proposes depressing Grady Way under Rainier Avenue and adding an at-grade or elevated ramp at the intersection to accommo- date the westbound-to-southbound turning movement. This improvement, by separating thru traffic and left turns on Grady Way from the Rainier Avenue traffic,would substan- tially increase capacity at the intersection. Left turns from Rainier Avenue (north-to-west and south-to-east)would remain on the at-grade level of the intersection. The estimated cost for the total improvement is$4,000,000. The entire project must be designed as a whole before phasing can be determined. Right-of-way issues also must be resolved. It appears that the project could be split into two major elements: depressing S Grady Way under Rainier Avenue S and constructing the loop ramp. Each of these ele- ments would cost approximately$2.000.000. S Grady Way/S Main Avenue/ Benson Intersection The traffic study for the Village Place North project indicates that this intersection currently operates at LOS F. Forecasts indicate LOS F will continue into the future. The LOS F con- ditions are primarily due to heavy southbound thru flows from Main to Benson and the northeast to northbound thru movements from S Grady Way to Main Avenue S. It is likely that LOS F conditions will continue into the future unless S Main Avenue/Benson Road is widened from one lane in each direction to add a second southbound thru lane. In the interim, some relief may be realized by adding an exclusive right-turn pocket on the S Grady Way leg. This improvement is estimated to cost$20.000 to construct a 100-foot lane and 40-foot taper. Our preliminary review indicates that it is unlikely that additional right of way would be required to construct this improvement. Summary We have found that the Grady Way TBD study accounts for the planned buildout of the Village Place North site, that it is unlikely that the S Grady Way/Rainier Avenue S project could be effectively phased into smaller project, and that improvements at Grady Way/ Benson/Main would cost$20,000 to add a right-turn lane. , Mr. Mel Wilson The November 7, 1990 Tmnspo Group I trust this letter provides the city with the information they need to evaluate the Village Place North proposal. Please contact me if you have any questions. Very truly yours, The TRANSPO Group, Inc. ti,k; aeraL Erin Allyson Bard, P.E. Transportation Engineer Robert L. Shindler Consultant EAB/RLS/gap cc: Loren Laskow, Renton Village Clint Morgan, City of Renton ,+ Ao CIT'S _ OF RENTON Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Earl Clymer, Mayor Lynn Guttmann, Administrator PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF RENTON October 24, 1990 OCT 2 5 1990 '. EVE Jack Herklotz, Senior Planner The ORB Organization, Inc. EC 510 Evergreen Way Renton,, WA. 98055-3522 SUBJECT: Village Place North Dear Mr. Herklotz: We have prepared this letter to acknowledge your letter of October 4, 1990 and to clarify our position on the points you stated. It is not our opinion that most of the drainage problems on this site are a result of upstream development not providing on-site storm detention. We now know that past drainage requirements and facilities for developments do not meet todays standards to mitigate the downstream impacts of the resulting increased peak rates and volume of runoff. It is equally true that past development, such as that which has occurred on this site, did not use current standards or methodologies to analyze and account for upstream off-site runoff, existing on-site retention/storage (such as in wetlands), and downstream off-site conditions (such as no or very little gradient). These characteristics exist on this site as evidenced by the enclosed map (1962 aerial topographic map). This map indicates that the site lay within a closed depression with little or no surface outflow and contained wetlands that were filled without compensatory storage. This explains the continuing existence of a 100 year floodplain over much of the site, as mapped by the Federal Emergency Management Administration (F.E.M.A.). It is our position, that rather than to try and apportion blame for the deficiencies of the existing drainage system and the flooding problems, we are offering to assist the developer in resolving these flooding problems once and for all. With respect to your specific points: (1) We do not agree that biofiltration facilities could not be provided. We do feel that a more regional approach to meeting surface water quality concerns for the entire development is worth considering and thus could provide the necessary treatment provided by biofiltration. We do concur that a hydrologic study could demonstrate that storm water detention is not needed and is likely impractical due to the extent and frequency of flooding which currently occurs on the site. (2) We do desire to eliminate or minimize flooding of the site from all causes (for up to the 100 year design storm event) and in the most cost effective manner that meets all the requirements referenced by the City Code 4.22 and that mitigates other impacts identified by the S.E.P.A. process. 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2569 The ORB Organization, Inc. Page 2 (3) As stated above, a hydrologic study could demonstrate that storm water detention is not needed and is likely impractical due to the extent and frequency of flooding which currently occurs on the site. (4) We can provide assistance for the hydrologic and hydraulic analysis by providing the existing information about the off-site and on-site drainage facilities and guidance in performing the analysis. The existing information includes survey as-builts and hydrologic modeling that has already been performed for the Rolling Hills sub-basin as part of the Panther Creek Wetlands/P-9 Channel Storm Water Capital Project. (5) and (6) We concur, except with the last sentence of your item (6), see our introductory discussion above. (7) We concur, but we cannot represent the approval of other environmental concerns that might arise from the proposed off-site improvements. We are prepared to assist in identifying these concerns and defending the merits of the off-site improvements provided a net regional benefit exists. In addition, we understand the developer is only required to expend funds up to that required to mitigate the impacts from their development. We do appreciate the opportunity to consider contribution of funds for additional improvements which provide regional benefits over and above those needed for the proposed development. (8) We concur. (9) and (10) The proponent or developer is responsible for the application and securing all permits necessary to their proposal. We will assist in coordinating the necessary review and approvals (not including any review fees) of other agencies with respect to any proposed off-site drainage facilities. Any off-site drainage facilities necessary to mitigate impacts from the site would have to be constructed prior to approvals as they are for on-site drainage facilities. We cannot guarantee issuing building permits and/or certificates of occupancy for the project regardless of any approvals needed by other agencies for construction of off-site drainage facilities. (11) We could consider several financial alternatives to distribute any costs fairly for off- site improvements for properties benefitted by the off-site improvements over and above those costs directly associated with addressing the impacts of this proposed project. These alternatives could include a property owner sponsored L.I.D. or a Latecomers Agreement. (12) We concur. The City Storm Water Utility recognizes the existing flooding situation in the Village Place North shopping center as very significant and having an unacceptable impact on a large number of City and adjacent county residents. We are very interested in providing the flexibility and assistance it will take to solve this long standing problem. The ORB Organization, Inc. Page 3 We must, however, assure that this proposed project meets the spirit of all the requirements referenced by the City Code 4.22, and mitigates other impacts identified by the S.E.P.A. process. We look forward assisting your client in solving the flooding problems on this site. If you have any questions regarding our position on these points, please call me at 277-5548. If you or your engineer require any additional existing survey or hydrologic information we have for the drainage studies, please call Ron Straka, Storm Water Utility Civil Engineer, at 277-5547. Sincerely, ? anda . Par ons, P.E. tility Super isor Storm and W to Water Utility Section 90-358:RLP:ps cc. Richard Anderson P.E., Utility Systems Division Manager Ron Straka, Civil Engineer Don Erickson, Zoning Administrator Gregg Zimmerman,Plan Review Section Supervisor Enclosures .i,e-.1.0.. g4 ,00.:. \ - - 1 _ imaw Armor-4 wyg•1 1■m.4 eli-A 1•1-4%• I __ ___. ..... __. _ ,c .-- , ..-, .. •., r--- 0 Ino....- - . 0 • • : ,.'�,__ X \NfL.......\. ` S ....i. 41jv 4...... • _,..,-;---- \ t_ -—--- I ---,———,7,-— -•'------ ---—7-----r ZZ a El - Ta...-.E——7:: \\\ \ X , • 4000,..1,.2 tr ci1976:, -....ssofI l r .v / lk\ . it, ' . \ .---4 ;- 4 1111 \\�� O = r 1 1 N m t /i i I I Mill . V. A10,1111 I `1 3 \ \Ncc.\ \ \\ I •• 1 0 NI �`` \ ... \ _ Ad., S i I L_ Icv a iN X r. x ' \ 1 r— \N C, • I I o 1— -1 •-\ �� 1 fil \X�� i� I I �" I -- : \r)\// • --rrjj Ceiji L--1 stpw f ' 4,4% -,, , s\;, _ . iii:.--...... *-\__x____ ., • . , .411 . 4__. \ _ k \ . • .1 ill I �� `' �\ \� WAD li.1 CC Ai I Xa • \ \ 02 , ", ;. ‘fit,__ — till, , :-A 0 as lit . • i , .....___ __ \ \ \ \ El . I � \• \\ \ i'.\'''`\1-----k 11.\ • . ItAli 1Id biumiiiiir:.:1111). . I I • x \ (r al 1=1. AtiF ,-,. . , , , . • .\ \ ‘,......,...„ . ,, . as \ \ • • 1 1 - at, al I , / .\ ‘ t l `Illi `NGti a �oN . I x 4101)14. �s 'E SUB TAP II5 K . O! • i , =ill 11 . , , . aw- - ( 1- \ : ,, ..\\ ) i i, \1 1 O• ' it ,. • 1 1 -- / • \ •1 Ng I i i , o, i 11 ( _ 1 SEATTLE l •iiktilkini 11.1 ~ cD . I ' \ \II `' \ 1 \ I1Iii I __ 0. . _______ ... .. -..•‘. \.1 ‘ \i'.. ,4'1 . • Al \\ , ." / 1\ \ / • . i / I � �—'--, ; ) \ ., 1 fir— / 1 . (i) 7--‘ -... . . 30 I! y 1 4: c4/ f. ')1 '.1 I . 7 .. - '''• .\\ s_. `XN ,/ i_ I w k1 _� jiff": / .. - A, i t V(4"..77.:::- N.N. /i - 1. —//: - , ` ti'''C:K:ij 0 ) / ••\ r .l \\1\ , \\�. (i / `.\, t. \a, ,l,-:zv:.„,:. C;e"I'Alklk l.. ,,•tor&j, i`l 1 1 u tl ; ' ' i ,\\\.\.,_.. u' s ' E ,_±...... . \ ), 1 .1 1k :: w. . ''‘'.4\ .'7 aal \.\\ ;411A .c7i s.t __II !I ^-- I_ Al k. x '. ---- .., .. -...,.. ` • '� - • AERIAL i IY OF 1962 •• (''i' '1 �.., +►�'a, . . y •,•7Y!i+�����,��;�i,�” t#,��,� •�:,,��;I, �,i;,iilti+,A 1'Ia,lt;.�!11.r �..` it t. •� c ' 1�6! 'NFL, !:i .y'i.1 f}•i ,I j.; ,, y,:,yi, ��� .�7 1dPl�c',ijl' i ,1iyr{p�. rly �, 2;, q+t } GSIC REALTY CORPORATION 333 Twin Dolphin Drive, Suite 700 • Redwood City, CA 94065 Tel: (415) 593-3100 • Fax: (415) 593-2119 October 18, 1990 PLANNING DIVISION Mr. Don Erickson IaITY QF FENTON Ms. Lorraine Nickolay OCT 1990 . Development & Planning Section City of Renton RE v WED 200 Mill Avenue South , D Renton, WA 98055 Re: Notice of Pending Site Plan Approval, Renton Village Place North-Renton Village Center/S.Grady Way Dear Don and Lorraine: Thank you. for the opportunity to discuss briefly the pending site plan. approval for the Village Place North located at Renton Village Center, South Grady Way. As spoken; with Lorraine, we are interested in knowing the details Of the building and site plan approval for the proposed ' project, particularly as it relates to the environmental impact, e.g. , parking, traffic and any possible impacts on adjacent sites. Additionally, I would be grateful for any information relating to the time frame for the site plan and Building Permit approval process. Please feel free to call me or Brad Child if you have any questions. Thank you. S 'nce1 ely yours, Ri harer—Teo Se for Investmen Officer cc Jeffrey Kho . . •' 1 • . - . -.. • 1 , . . • . . . . . •::.•:::::::::IMII•.•:•.•• •.I.I!..I..II:ii••••••••••••••••••••••.*:........?..........:•.•.;•.•...................•••••••?:•••••••••••••••• •••••:.•••!•••.•:!?....:•••ENTO ••• •!•:•••••• •••••••.:.N N I N GtB U I.:;.•••.•:!•.•.•••.•::::••••••••••i:•.•••.:?:!." ::;••.::•••2•!".:••••.•:::::!!! !':•••.•::::•,:••!•::: ::•••••••.•IiI!•••....I.:•••. ,•:!•••.•'!•:•.....•::•••.•:!••:''..::::::P ....A: P.: •...IMP .:Iii•...::::•:•:n...:•::•:•.?:•: .•..•.iii..;•!...:,::.:;.:•!.... ni..:::•MD EPA RIM F P LA 'MI N 0/PU BLI GWORKS*:*::::*::T::::•:*]f::i.::**:*:.::::.*•: .. .:.::::::::.:::i.:::::g.M.M... ..:X:.:•ig•:4:::::::01:::::::MTECHNICALADVISCIFt.Y.:::i.:COilVIMITTE8u::::::::::::::::•::::::::::::::...* :::::*:•::.::::::::::.*:;:::::•*•:,...:::::::e..:::::::::::0 ::.:::::::::::::.:.::::;':. ..:.::::::::.0.::::MM.:::: ::.:.:.:::: :::::::::::.:..-::::: :::::1:::... ..:::.::::::::: ::'•:.:.::.::.:::::::.::::f.:::::::STAFF:i.iREPORri.:..:.:.::: : :::: ::::.n.:::::::: :: ::::.m....;:.....a........mimia:.m. ,,....:.:::: :::: :.:.:.•,:....:.:. ...:::::::::::::::::::::: : : :::::.::.::::::::::::::;:.::::::: :::::::i.....:::::::::•-:::...:.:::.b.::.:•:::::::.....:::: .:.•:::::.....::•: ::::::•::::•:,.::::::::::::::n:::::::::::.:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::;::::::::::::::::::::::.::::.:::::.::::::.:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::..:::::::::•::.::::::::.:-..,:::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::.:K:::::.:g:::.: :::::.m......m.....::::::: ::::::::::::.::::::.::::::::::::::::::.::::::.::::::::::..::::.....:......:.......•.... .............:::::::::.:,: ....:.:... :.:..............„:::::•.::::::::.;::::::::::: :::::•::::::::::::::.::::::....*:•,:.::.:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::.::::::::.::::::.::::::.:.::::....z........ ......,........:::::::::::::m.:.:.::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::x............:::::::::......w :::::::::::.:::::::0-::: : :::..:::u::::.:::: ::::::::::::::::::i: :: • ......--.: .:...:-.....: .•• .:::::::::::.cocTogER:.5:...:.1:990......:'..,..::......:::?....:..•...-..•:::............... ..... ...::::.:•.•........-.....:...:...:;.:.:: : ::.:.:: :.•.:...:.::.:::.:...:x::.*.:::.:...::.:.:::.:...:x ::::::::::.::::::::::::::::•.:::::::::::•.:::::::::::•.:::::,,:...:::::•.:.:•••.:.:•........:•.:............•••.•.....•:..-...........:.::....-:.•::::::.:.•.......,:::::::::.:::::•....::::.::,...::::„.••••::::::.•::::::::::::::::;::::::::::::::::-::::•::::::,••.........•...................:::......„.:....,,,,,.............:.,:.:....:.,:•:....,,,, , . . :...:•••...:..:.../:...:..i.:.......:...•:.:::;::::::::::.:-.:.:.•:.::.:.......::::.:::::•.B•.•:•.•••A:....:...-.....iL..i:.•..••:.•..::;r:..•:,.;..A•;.:.:....•.:K•.::u..:...•••.••••:ry.... u: .. . • .. „.....•::.••..• •. • •...•••.••••.•• . •. : :. ,........:::..:::••••,......... •... .• . •-••........••.:.,....•.:::.•:.:.::::::•:.::::::::.:::::::::::,:::::::::::::::::::::::::.w., :..........• . • • •......-.:::.:•...:....• -.::.....:...•:. .:.::.............-.• .:..:. •,.......•,................:::•:::::-...,:::::,,..:i........,...•• ..•... •........:..„••:.:,:...........:::•::-::.:::.:.::...:.::i:::..... .:::::.:•.:::.:::::::.::.:: ::::1111 :::::::::::::::::::::.::::::::::::::::::::::•:::::::::::::::::::::::.:::.•••••::•::::•:.••.:::..:....:........„... •...............:::::::........:,.•••::::............,-....:....:.:...:.:::::..•:••:•:•••.. :••••.:.::.:.......•.:...:::::.::::::::::..:--:::.:.::•::::::••.::..:::-:.•..•::•.:...:::...::.:::::.::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::ill: .. . ................................................„„.................... ........,............,......... .. ,,...............,...... .......•.. .....•..........................Village..•........................._.•...,...,.............•.......,............................................•.....................................................................„.., .......*......*:mi...::::...x .: i.Ap..}...1.u.cANT:.:i::::::.:: : : :m::::::..........::.: :.:::::...,.:0..: ::::::... :;:.o•.•••::Refitbil :::.Aggtiotategiiii...ii:::siiiii:::::::. gii:0::iiiii::::.:iii.....:::::: iigi::::.::iii::::::nliii ._._... __.._._._.__.._.__._.._ _... _... _._ ._._._._...._.______.___. ._......._......._._._._____.___________._._........,,,„...„ _......._._._._._._.____._...._...._..._..• _...._.____......._._______......._______._.__...,"2,".„."....,,,,,......."............. ::•.:::1:::::::!:0.1::..11.:•11.i....int.. ...0.0t0t.:,$.1#.10:;:g.E"'iiiii.:a;:1:1:•hiiid: :::iii.8540.1.1. :64.0•40.iii0$66:'Illiiiggliiii.iiii•.,.iiiligniiii:•.liii'Mal:•••••..aingaillii .• ......I.....:!::::I!!...........••••••!:.......!.....:',I,•••.:::*:•.•.•.•••.•••.•:!i.":••••••!••••••:.I::::::::: ::::::::.*:•....I,•::::::]f.......:!::::::::::::::.I!•::I:••*•:!I•j.::::.!•::::::If::::::::•::•:•.•:::k......•:•. :•.I*I*I•.:::5.*':!••• •K:I•.:!:.&:•.•:•.•• •. :•::I:•:!•:!•::::.•:•.•:•.•:!K•.:::•. •.••••.I..•::•:*?.•:!•:0.::::I*•:•.•:•?.:•.•:*•:•.:•.•::::•:*•: :I.:.!•:*•:* ::::::.I...IfI*III! ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• ••• ••• •• •• • • •• •• • • •• •• • ••• • • •• ' •••• ....••••••••• •••• •••• •••• .•••••••••• - • • • • I .:.:::•::.•:?IiI... .....•:.!•• ••• •:::::ENVRoNNAENTALicHEcKus7r...,:::::::;.:::::::::::m.... E0F,sAcuv.:;01.8ga.......g::::::::.::: ::. ::: :.......iaiigi......&..i:.....a.:::::::.imiii....0.:::: ::::::::.:::::::.::.::::llii .......... ...:iini .Qii.iii......:.:..a.::::::: :......,-.::: : : :, ......::: ::::::::ii...:.ii,. ......m..........................:.:::::: :: :.miii.........::....:::iiim...ini.........:R......mii......N......:::::::::,:a:, 0 .i.06.1Eii.. ...ii:ti:.......QEf:::::: ::::00..W.::::.t0.1.4. td.V1.....(95:'..,.f.00t)::::::.0.f.10 :./.)'-.0i4ii460.......bijildit.i0:::::•2).:: ite.....Plari::.001.4.0Vali:lbtlii i6:tilitii6it'ofi.*:...0:66.(adifid.....0aiiiM.....d6 .6fitij5ittitiii::::::.64611.iid.i6i61.1',..:Cefit4e:::0-i'..thV;Otibje. t:::::06.00r.W.:::Atidlii ''.:.:'•-':::':...:.::::'': :::l!::.:.:':.::fe.i:.,i:....::::::t.:...q:C6i.:)0fqn::.4...:::.:: ....setil.:a ::li":O# :*:..(6-';gl.. ji:8:'i446:6:.;:li6:.i.: ti86j..64:':.:.:i'8:6sf6:6 :6H4iii:A'6).::.',aiia::i:::.:::.6j: Wll', ...........i':.::::....:ii: A:.:6:: :a. i-id:n'ee'''.iT•HrAn,4.:cHo'n's'itueikiii,:0141-iew..o•rivgai'oddw6y.to....s6eve:the:..develdorriorki:::::::::::::::::::i:::::::::::)::::::::::.*:.*::::::::.:.iii ......„.:ii.::::::::::::,:.:::.:.:Iii.......:::i.,.:i::.:.:..... ......,:i...:::.:.....,:::.:...,........-.......-...:.........:.:::-.............-:::.....::::...........::::::.:.:::.:::..::.i,.....:.::::.:::.........:::::::::::.::::.::....,...... :if...:.:.::::::.....:.......::::::::::.-::::.::::..::.:.:;.,:::::.....::.::::::......„:,:.....:;::::.:....:.:..:.::::......:::::::.....:?:::i::::.:::::::::0,..m.. .....m.p.....m.mi;. . . ........ .. ....... .. ... .................i.::...............„..........„.:::: ::::.:::.:::.......,.....:,..:.:,...:::.....::::::.....:,:::.„.......:::::::::::.::::::.:::.....,....:...,..:::::::„..:....‘,.......::::::„......:......,........,::::::.:,::::::.:.:, ,. ::,*:::::: ::: :„....:::::,„........................::::.:,::::..:....::: :::.:.:,..,.:::i::::..:::......::::.::: : ::::::::,.....„::::...:,:,:,::::::...„::,:,..., ,,,...z ::::::::,::::::::::...... . .......:LOCATI 0 N 0 FT R 0.P 0 SAL::::::.:::::::::?::.::::•:.:1::::::.:.::::::R e tit 0 ti.:Vi I I age.:LentortSouttf:Gitdy:Way.:::::::::::::,::imi:E:.::::: :n:i:i:ia .......:.::::..:::::::.:::::•::::: :•:•:::::,:::::....::::::::::::::..:::::::::,:::::::::::::::::::.:::::::::::....::::::-..:..................,..:: :•::::::.....::::::•,::::::::::.:::.::::...::::.,..:.-....:.-.::::::::.::::.....:::::...:::•••:....::::::::::.....:::.::-.:.:::.::::::::::::::.....::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::0. , . . . . .-- . ' 04 MeV PARK Alb Rtc6 --1...„.......,----e" r ) _ ::..";-11'"-- --- j. ------- — = j I tua-r•ol ,..),,.:::::--- .; ---(;V:7,-,f,',./f:"' % I .-1.s=, L_ . • 1: ----. -'''' 40',.../ '-''-j t•-) , , iv. -:::::--- •\ \I... e),-- ----;',7". ,Ii),.-=4:::—• ' , -, . . ..• - --- ••-....• , - • -•'--:-;""" ' •" - •$ ,,,-- u KIND linurnsui • / % il 1 • - .1 ... VI f \ . ''------::-.'"" 8KAPY 0Ay =.1f,-...=!-:-7:- ---;4 , . , , - : • ,--- -- ..--- 1 ... ,i • ‘.I. ,-- . 6citurism • 1 Inv • rforct, re 77' I • I nm.4 ...;.51-a4f,/,-,4,4-stew/__-- ..-• " 0-:‘:iii:It -''' „if; .' ;/ X/1-- ' 4"'e,7'e‘ I .,..r.:5:::::::::::-\'',\ • I 1 1 . - ; '' •.'"......, , .,.M73'4;1.71'.• . 411KWMAy ,..,.„,:: , '1;=: - — --''',J (11 • • . . --,.,.. ..!.,'. ,,,..-_ _ N7,3*,:,•::::••!1:11,%, ,I 'I, 1-- ! '1 • 'N I --- 1 ,,.:;;•:,..••• ••.•,../*.:$t•ZI.,i•ticir:Fi, • ••-' /T.,,. , ./ s:11,-.q v/ — •:::.:-1 it , r .'.,-,..;,,,,,I.A0'.1 1 ...:........- 1 "1.'. . ' ''''t.„''" i 1 tR'1, ,..::-.k.:64,53t.h lie$'4'.“;ii,!1.•ki:P' ...,,,,'.., • , ...,., ...., ,' '::• :-.• :t' ., r?';htt:,.,.f., 5'.1:'S,Nli!.=. - —. . ,'.!..'" " *.14 6 ; 7i77 -;•7 4:.ff '"'"'"•' I -------- 1 - '- .1 ...,'?:.,,,'%.cl!Sh,.';,t,,,. , ./ 4-- ii;I:e.";41;;;:.7..;VA,144. **AN itik IL . ',- !' ,- . , _ — i I, 11: 1 ' • 1 ...1.:1,*:•-5-.....'?I'Y i'::-.;, t'n'•:Yi;.; - --- *-4;"..7.4R42-. v--ik •‘.‘ s o 3-- I__ . ,. ,: • n 1 / ; AtP,T;IPS.131i5f1,; i i.1 4— b; Mill 1-1 , pirialetal t__5, , ,,, ,.,„., . . ,. : .o, ... • 3:-4°. ..41.,.4,•:,1--k • d*'.." ts:::-.5..,;..a I• i 11. :1-__--Pl..r1 ' ',;', ';Ag,:iii?' ' °- -- „.,„s„,.... „ r4,.,, F .1 • •,•ii,11.77-„ • . , , t=7.,,,..-..,),,......,,,,,,,,,v,,•, ,,,„„m-:„..,...:v.i. 'P4Zggi0:1'41W;'''...1,... -c i --> _. -lb •.:-' 'r' '; ' , ;:;&11),Iiii,,1";i.:9,47.0;:•.,::: 44,ii.4: // pl;''''A;;47:11 .:ter;Lk;?) . ,-,.. , I- .r '4'::Wi.'i,,.t.Ag,;i":0,A,,;',1'Vqg.4.4:;',!.4-; at701::1"141'4.ttS • R\\'\'\ • , . !lid° Cr' C=' ''`...-'21 r,-: ' tt•-•.;:,‘,..,..,:y.,-,,,,,,,;--,,,,...•:...0.,:i.;,:,,,... ,-i,.,., \ \ IT ' , . 1 rt . •'''‘ I'. :. ." ..;R::,S) ;i:.;.4:?'1;.. 1 i 6 a1 II V/ 007414.. ..,:xty,,,y 75 eg • • , • ,..2.44c. \ \ t 41 llIf .. ALf '..). u i/ i': .r,..•.;)',!.':,/,s1;.,.'0.til.t.il te-;i•44.;•,-, . ""'''''''';''''0',Vif;;;;;4;5i.illi:'‘'i•A W. '''',k4P'!,i.,4,14.•',,,V,4,,W41 V,'. :tY:A-',1(1V;p11'44'it'lt;t3' t- ---3 • ''''...tl'Ik4:':0;,'ix:';I:.'`ilt,t,•tt.*, -- • ,C1,- Pr<'''',..,, I c ., •, Qi".:0',In Wa 4(0,1, ' qi — •• . . .. . .: • / . 6,, r"- ,,••.. • -.... •,4•;i,•,-gi v . Mqf F7097./4 r.' L: \. ---1 M4.(6....., ....-,.., At)'-\\\ u‘._ .N" . . ‘ • ' J.44/NC, • /"-ONI • `,.,‘•4. " .-.sr 1.4...•,,,..nea-r“4, , \ .Ns1344'. • .• '.....,' . -- 1 -- -.. -.., 1,,,,- 1 .•:, •••\ ‘ 1 .. • , . \ '..,.`‘ \i N,.. ti ------r'.;,-7:-- --,-..'-- 'e.-- • . . . , . " • ',.. \\ \I N • . • ‘..1 ,-. . . ' .. .. . . • . ...'. -• f ._„.... . ----,:i V, , • .''',- • ••• ,--1 r --.. ' . . - ...... ...,....; .. ......, . .. .. . ...,.. .-,,- .• ,-.J •••• , 1..... . . . . . 1 VWXY. - ...., !,: I ! ,• I • • !. I OW Icifart/I4 Mai, 1 , ....•.:•: I: &ROCA()4.1t*i•V• : ' •••• „ . JJ•- ' . . . • . • ' . . . . • • Technical Advisory Committee •__:; Report --t Village Place North • OCTOBER 5, 1990 • Page 2 • • LAND USE • • • 1. 'Whether the proposed development is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan? . • The proposed renovation and development of an office/retail complex complies with the • Comprehensive Plan Map designation of."Commercial Use" for the subject site, and is in compliance with relevant Goals, Policies and Objectives for commercial and office developments. • 2. Whether the proposed development is consistent with the Land Use Map designation? The proposed development complies with the Land.Use Map designation for"Commercial Use" (B- • 1). • .3. Whether the proposed development (including new construction and ,renovations) is consistent with the'Zoning Ordinance and other applicable regulations/standards? • • The proposed complex generally complies with applicable development standards for the. Commercial Zone, as well as those regulations established in the Landscaping Ordinance and the Parking and Loading Ordinance. ,Because the proposed office tower exceeds the existing height limit of 95 feet in the B-1 zone by approximately 38 feet, the project must go through conditional use approval. Additionally,the development generally is consistent with criteria established for site plan approval, conditional use permits and variances. 4. • Whether the proposed development is consistent with vicinity land uses? • The subject property is currently developed with commercial and office uses, as is property to the south, east and west of the site. Property to the north of the site is currently zoned L-1'and developed with a Metro Park and Ride Lot. The site Is convenient to major City arterials, a state roadway; and 1-405. In addition, it is close to SeaTac and the Renton Municipal Airport. Staff believe that the proposed action is consistent with surrounding land uses and would enhance the image and character of the surrounding area. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS • . • 1. Whether the applicant has adequately identified and addressed the following environmental impacts likely to occur in conjunction with the proposed development? a. Land Use . • Impacts: The subject proposal for some 260,363 sq.ft. of new, net rentable office space and approximately 13,650 sq.ft. of new retail space on the first floor, as well as some 79,000 sq.ft. of remodelled space will, when combined with the office and retail space already on the Renton Village Shopping Center site help anchor this southern edge of the downtown as a strong commercial and 'retail node. Although on•the edge of the • downtown proper, this node should help stabilize the commercial designated (comprehensive plan) and/or zoned properties to the north. The proposed office tower itself would house approximately 800 to 1,000 new employees who would be likely to at least occasionally take advantage of other.retail uses and services in the area. It is also possible that some retail activity could be drawn away from the existing core into this area because of its more readily available off-street parking, more contemporary image, and critical mass. • Mitigation Measures: Because no specific adverse environmental impacts on land use have been identified, specific land use related mitigation measures have not been recommended. Policy Nexus: Environmental Review Ordinance, 4-6 • b. Aesthetics • Impacts: The subject proposal,as noted above, includes plans for a new 10 story, mixed- use, office/retail building and a five story parking garage designed to house some 930 Technical Advisory Committee to„-'Report Village Place North • OCTOBER 5, 1990 Page 3 parked automobiles. Aesthetically,the new office building should be an attractive addition • to the downtown, using a combination of painted concrete spandrels and bluish green tinted glazing, and porcelain tiles as an accent material for exterior surfaces at ground level and at the top of the building. To add visual interest, the northwest corner of the building has been articulated in plan so that It breaks away from the standard rectilinear form of most contemporary office buildings. This, along with a somewhat sculpted top two floors, and an articulated first floor featuring a recessed arcade on the east face of the building, and a plaza on the south, should make this new building one of the more aesthetically pleasing office buildings to look at in the City. The proposed new five-story parking garage, which will be over 480 feet long along its eastern facade, will poise an architectural challenge to break down the apparent bulk of this large structure and integrate it thematically with the more suburban scale found elsewhere in the center. The architects for this project have attempted to break up the mass of the garage by indenting the corners of the garage closest to Grady Way, introducing some slight (depth wise) 30 plus feet wide recessed areas and stairwells,.as well as the introduction of different materials and textures along different portions of the garage's facades. Along the street sides of the garage, larger (14- 20 foot high, 4-6 inch' calibre) trees are proposed to soften the "view from the street". The southwestern and eastern facades of the garage will more visible as smaller sized (2 inch calibre) street trees, 30 feet on center, are proposed to mask the south end of the garage and only a narrow row of shrubs are proposed to screen the garage along its eastern facade. It should be noted that approximately two thirds of this latter facade will be screened by the ten story office building, some 50 feet to its east. Some landscaping (11 flowering cherry trees, of 2 inch calibre) is also proposed for the roof of the garage. In addition to these major new structures, approximately 11,000 sq.ft. of new retail space is proposed in a two new retail spaces that will abut either side of a new pedestrian pathway that connect the new office building to the other major office buildings on the campus. • The two new smaller retail areas will be located at the north end of Pay-N-Save and the south end of Thriftway. In addition to this new addition, the front of these existing stores (including Schumskys) will be faced with a new colonnaded arcade that will thematically match that along the ground floor of the new office building. Aesthetically, staff believe that the office and retail portions of the project work well with one another because of their thematic continuity. As noted above, the office building is likely to be an attractive addition to the City's skyline, as well. Only the existing Ernst store and the parking garage would appear to have the distinction of not thematically"fitting In". Because of its very dissimilar use, different floor to ceiling heights, and different engineering requirements, there is little, other than additional landscaping and some possibly greater articulation around the stairwells, little that can be done to dramatically change the appearance of the parking garage. On the other hand it would seem reasonable that a similar colonnaded arcade like that in front of Pay-N-Save, could be used to better integrate the Ernst store into the whole complex. Mitigation Measures: The applicant shall revise the landscape plan to include more significant landscaping around the southwestern facade of the five story parking garage in order to soften its apparent bulk and that consideration be given to developing a matching colonnaded arcade across the front of the existing Ernst store so that it ties in better thematically with the whole complex. Policy Nexus: Environmental Review Ordinance, 4-6 c. Noise, Light and Glare Impacts: Other than during the construction phase, impacts from noise associated with the proposed use are not expected to be great. Since there is a nearby hotel, construction hours should be limited to regular working hours to protect the privacy of hotel guests. Reflective glare from the proposed 10-story office building is not expected to be readily • visible from major arterials or 1-405 where it could impact the vision of motorists. However, to confirm this, the applicant needs to prepare a reflective glare diagram for those hours and times of the year when reflective glare is likely to be visible from the building. This is when the angle of the reflected sunlight is 30 degrees or less with the horizontal. Construction related light and glare, if known, should be mitigated. On site lighting will be screened ta be retained on site. Technical Advisory Committee Staff Report Village Place North OCTOBER 5, 1990 Page 4 Mitigation Measures: The applicant shall prepare a solar glare diagram at least two weeks prior to public hearing for those'hours of the day on the equinox, summer, and winter solstices when the angle of reflected sunlight is at an angle of 30 degrees or less with the horizontal in order that staff can ascertain whether reflected glare is likely to impact 1-405 or Grady Way traffic. Policy Nexus: Environmental Review Ordinance, 4-6 d. Transportation Impacts: The Transportation Systems Division has indicated that there could be significant impacts on the transportation system from this project "plus the potential for future projects". This division has advised that the applicant should provide a Transportation Plan for the Renton Village area and that the findings of that study should be Incorporated into the Grady Way TBZ prior to site plan approval. The applicant did complete a traffic analysis for their proposal which indicated that the intersection of S. Grady Way and Lake Avenue S. be improved with improvements to the south leg of the intersection by widening it to allow two exclusive northbound left-turn lanes and a through right lane. Mitigation Measures: Staff are recommending that the applicant prepare a more extensive. traffic analysis including the intersection of South Grady Way/Benson Rd. at Main Avenue S. and the whole of the Renton Village area prior to the public hearing for site plan approval; and that a Transportation Management Plan be developed for the new office/retail complex. In addition, staff are recommending that the intersection of S. Grady Way and Lake Avenue S. be improved as proposed in the applicant's Traffic Study. Policy Nexus: Environmental Review Ordinance,4-6 e. Public Services/Utilities (1) Emergency Services Impacts: If built pursuant to code, the subject proposal Is not anticipated to have significant adverse impacts.on fire services. Fire Prevention has instructed that the office tower must comply with all "high rise requirements". Police have reviewed the project and believe that more information is needed on the security provisions that will be in place in the parking garage to ensure security. Staff are recommending that security provisions acceptable to the Police Department be agreed to prior to the public hearing for site plan approval for this project. Mitigation Measures: The applicant shall provide a security plan, acceptable to the Police Department, prior to the public hearing for site plan approval. Policy Nexus: Environmental Review Ordinance, 4-6 (2) Storm Water Management Impacts: The proposed development can be incorporated into that existing • system effectively, however, special measures may be required to achieve the necessary levels of service to the development and necessary levels of protection to the subject property (and neighboring sites) as a result of the fact that portions of the site are subject to flooding during the rainy season. • Mitigation Measures: That the applicant shall develop a storm drainage and flood protection plan acceptable to the Storm Drainage Section at least two weeks prior to the public hearing for site plan approval. in addition,the applicant is required to • provide a "hold harmless" letter(accepted as to form by the City Attorney) prior to the issuance of any building permits for this project. Policy Nexus: Environmental Review Ordinance, 4-6; Storm.Water and Surface Water Drainage Management Ordinance. (3) Recreation Impacts: The subject property is proximate to passive recreation activities (e.g., picnic tables, movie theater) on (or adjacent to) this site. Additionally, Burnett . l ., Technical Advisory Committee-6-al."cleport • ' .. Village Place North OCTOBER 5, 1990 Page 5 ` • Linear Park is nearby. In order to ensure an adequate range and quantity of • recreational opportunities to employees and users of the Center,the applicant has proposed quarter mile long walking/jogging path around the parking structure which is to include a couple of stretching and exercising stations. Staff believe consideration should be given to extending the exercise path around the whole • site and that the applicant should be asked to provide an indoor exercise room and•shower facilities for future employees. Mitigation Measures: The applicant shall provide an indoor exercise room as well as shower facilities for male and female tenants and their employees. Policy Nexus: Environmental Review Ordinance, 4-6; Comprehensive Parks Plan. . f. Construction Impacts: Standard .construction impacts are anticipated in conjunction with proposed demolition, renovation and development of new buildings. Particular care will be needed to mitigate noise, traffic, dust and debris impacts to persons working on/using "functioning" portions of the subject development, and to those travelling to and from nearby office and commercial facilities. . Mitigation Measures: The applicant shall develop a Construction Management Mitigation, Plan that addresses hours of operation, hauling routes, staging areas, employee and . contractor parking, erosion control, and the disposal of hazardous materials associated with construction. Said Plan shall be acceptable to environmental and plan review staff in the Public Works Department and shall be prepared prior to the public hearing,on site plan • approval. Policy'Nexus: Environmental Review Ordinance, 4-6 • . ... ...::.:....: `:`` i:mrrnin 0 <�>:: taff�r"cociimerldhat:::the:ER!C:;isSue:::a ...:e.;�.;..>:.:;:�•:;.;:•:;,,: :; ,.::> »:::: �;.>. 11AENDAT:I.ONS <::;:<::<::: ::;`::....S:::::::e:::.::.::::.......::.:..�::.•::....: .... ..:.. ...::.�::.:..:::::.:::. ...:•..:.:,:,...::.�::::: t d>::::.with;:t e: conditione:: :......: ..::.;::::.:.:.::.:..::•::..:....:..:.•:..:.:<:-: ... ..::..,..:...::::.;:�:::..:::..::_:.....:...:of.:::Non-5ignifica:.ce.:. ::�.:.:9 •..•::.•: ::�::;:<.;:•>::::.::<•::.>:•::::;>:.;:::::<::�; e• :< :::::;':<: > >: < ::` :: :<:::: :::::::::>:. ....::::...::::.�::::::::::::::.:::�.:::.:::,:..:. :.:::.::.::..::.::::.;:.;:.:•::�:::. :.:�.:::discussed::abo.v.:..:::::.::.;::::.:<:::...:.:.:..::.:..;:;�.:::; .;;>::•::.:::.::.:.;>:.:::::::;:::::::.::>:::;:;: Di::.:i::::»:.C.OM.M •EN:•TS:•O:F•:.R• :EV:I.EWING.D•Ef�ART. .. . ... .. .. . rtments have:.ev..iewed and:,commented:upon.the;:project;.�These: otl?.fn:..ett.. i ;;:���::::�:: ::::::;�Uerious:CltY:depa...: . : : ��:.:.::.r:...: :.::;.�...� :� . . .. • LAND USE . Police Department: . • See attached memo. • Fire Prevention Bureau: Must comply and be constructed: to high rise - requirements. Fire flow of .1,500 is required. Two hydrants with a minimum flow of 1,000 gpm is required. • Primary hydrant is to be 150' of structure. Secondary . . hydrants are to be 300' of structure. All other normal . code requirements are necessary. . Transportation Systems: See attached memo. Parks and Recreation: Development should include participation in a voluntary recreational improvements in the area. Note; These improvements will serve users and employees of the building. Sewer Utilities: 1) Drawings shall be 22" x 34", scale 1" = 20'for all utility plans. 2) Applicant must obtain easement releases for . water lines & sewer lines in easements which are to be . abandoned and/or removed. 3) Gull oil stn tank removal ' and soil remediation must be completed. 4),All covered levels in parking garage will be drained to sanitary sewer. . • Technical Advisory Committee: :.... Report Village Place North ° OCTOBER 5, 1990 Page 6 Install oil/water separator with bypass sized to handle garage fireflow. 5) Side sewers must have minimum 2% slope (1%slope for 8" sewers). Storm Water: 1) The drainage plans for this proposal shall comply with the core and special requirements contained in Section 1.2 and 1.3 of Chapter 1,the hydrologic analysis methods contained in Chapter 3, the hydraulic analysis and design methods contained In Chapter 4, and the erosion/sedimentation control plan and practices contained in Chapter 5 of the 1990 King County Surface Water Design Manual. 2) Downstream analysis will be required for the 36" existing storm line. 3) Site Is in the 100-year floodplain as designated on FEMA map. 100- year water level is elev. 24. FF elev. minimum 25, ok. 4) Analyze and mitigate impacts to the 100-year floodplain in this area. If water storage volume is removed from floodplain, compensatory storage must be added. 5) Parking area @ SE corner of site will require more catch basins. Min. 1% grade to CB in parking lots. 6) Intermediate manways in detention pipes shall riot be placed in traffic areas. 7) Due to history of flooding on this site, it would be beneficial to conduct a predesign meeting between City&applicant to address problems. Building Division: No Building code check done. Long Range Planning: Project supports intensification of existing office/commercial center. Building elevations are very unclear. What is the City getting if approve this project? ENVIRONMENTAL Police Department: Impact is tied to parking structure security and eventual tenants. Building may have only a minor impact, but that is impossible to determine at this point. Fire Prevention Bureau: Minor impact to public services. Transportation Systems: This project, plus the potential for future projects, will, have serious consequences for the transportation • system. See attached review comments. Parks and Recreation: Recommend the proponent review the proposed Parks Comp Plan and Proposed Trails Master. Also the proponent speaks to.a trail systems in the development and the plans do not show such. The Plaza area will serve the communities interest, •i.e., restaurant. Recommend the proponent investigate the on-site and off-site impacts for the employees. The site is sufficient to incorporate an on-site trail and pedestrian system. Storm Water: 1) Project is in the 100-year floodplain, FEMA map designation AH, water level 24. '2) Site is not In sewer moratorium. 3) Site is in the Talbot Hill Collection Basin. 4)There is a 36"storm line @ SW corner of site. Building Division: Minor housing impact. Sewer Utilities: 1) Project is in the 100-year floodplain, FEMA map designation AH, water level 24. 2) Site is not in the sewer moratorium. 3) Site Is not in APA zone. 4) Site is in Talbot Hill Collection Basin. 5) Existing 8" sanitary sewers are available for connection throughout site. Water Utilities: Watermain improvements required are shown in orange highlight on attached water plan (Attachment #24). We • Technical Advisory Committee Staff Report Village Place North OCTOBER 5, 1990 Page 7 recommend,that applicant set up predesign meeting with Development Services prior to design of proposed utility system. Long Range Planning: Project will have impacts upon views from surrounding neighborhoods (significant?) and traffic. Traffic study looks good but should be verified by Traffic Engineering. High water table (7.5' see Geotech) seems to need special mitigation. Final approval of FAA would be good, only document on record seems to be a denial of earlier • • application. RENTON POLICE DEPARTMENT At��, , MEMORANDUM ' 4f J�.� ,.,,, , ' 'o/y'� ^t.a DATE: August 2, 1990 ;t, TO: Planning Division Cd ' FROM: Penny Bryant,Police Department , SUBJECT: VILLAGE PLACE NORTH ' . The police department has several recommendation for the Village Place North project. Most of the concerns surround the construction of the parking structure. Parking garages are known for the lack of security they provide and the increase in vulnerability that they cause for the users of such structures. Such facilities are typically dark, making it difficult to see,floors are on a grade,further obstructing sight.There often is no method of summing aid. Some recommendations for improving the safety at Village Place North are as follows: 1. In the parking structure, the stairwells are located on exterior walls of the • buildings. They are shown in tiled towers. The tiling is fine,but the towers should also have glazing material from the ground to the roof. This glazing allows visibility of the occupants from outside the structure. 2. In the parking structure,the stairwells should be equipped with emergency notification systems,call boxes or phones for emergency response. 3. The parking structure should have a minimum eight foot clearance throughout • the garage. ' 4. The structure should have designated walking paths that are illuminated'. , 5. In the parking structure,the stairwells should be clearly marked'and the direction in which to travel to reach them,also clearly identified. 6. The parking structure should have lighting in the stairwells at all times. 7. Any retail businesses located in the office structure should not have reflective glass. Tinted is acceptable.. , 1'. ,;.; • t ';. 4i Village Place North Office/Retail Project Renton Village Center August 1, 1990 Subject: Site Review Comments • 1. Sidewalks to be provided on Grady Way abutting property frontage. 2. Intersection of S. Grady Way and Lake Avenue S. provide traffic improvement to south leg of intersection as proposed in Traffic Study. ,Widen South leg to allow two exclusive northbound left-turn lanes and a through right lane. Intersection design to meet City Standards. ' 3. As indicated in the Traffic Study, a Transportation Management plan to be developed for the new office/retail project. 4. This project, plus the potential for future projects, will ,have serious ' consequences for the Transportation system. A Transportation plan is to be developed for the Renton Village area. Also, a proposal is to be prepared from the findings to •be incorporated into the Grady Way TBZ, which subsequently may be modified. This plan should be completed, prior to issuance of site plan ,, approval. ' 5. Transportation mitigation fees will be determined and applied after the findings in item 4 above. 6. The intersection 'of South Grady Way/Benson 'Rd./at Main Avenue S. to be included in the proposed plan developed in item 4 above. • • • CEM380/CEM/mr • • • • 0 / r' 2.{..) �''` �'9 c�, 1.2��_ ,.j E� Y,/ n CJ� .C�=�'S C'_ et)GI '•�.. E', S 1 r, • 5 ' '(.<• • •is•t {; :fix'.:' j 4 ' ''t' :,.i,• •Q+• r .!j i,' .•'fit, . '1 f, ,, t • • . :::::::::::::u•::<:.::::.;::..>:::<:::.:::.::::::::::::::::>::::; •Technical.Advisor :Comm :..::.::.:: :.::: ::.::::: : :: :......::::..::..:::::: MEETING NOT •ICE...... :.: '';::::' October 5, 1990 To: Gregg Zimmerman Rubin Yu Glen Gordon Sam Chastain Penny Bryant c(z6?/i)Jim Hanson From: on Erickson, Chairman Meeting dates ``" October 5, 1990 ......:::.....:..:. ': 8:30 AM Location:' Third Floor Conference Room Agenda is listed below. • TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE AGENDA OCTOBER 5, 1990 Third Floor Conference Room Commencing at 8:30 AM • • TIME/KEY PARTICIPANTS NEW PROJECTS VMC OFFICE ADDITION ECF;SA-100-90 The applicant seeks site plan approval to construct a two story office addition. The project Is located at 400 South 43rd Street. • HAGLUND REZONE ECF;R-097-90 Applicant seeks a non-project, programmatic rezone of an approximately 57,584 square foot parcel from R-1, i Single-Family Residential Use, to B-1, Commercial Use. The parcel is currently developed with a small business office In a residential-type structure which would remain on the site; no revision to the existing use or new development is presently being considered, however, as the building is an older one, it Is conceivable that redevelopment might take place in the foreseeable future. • The project is located at 4016 Jones Avenue. Village Place North ECF;SA;CU;V-078-90 Applicant seeks: 1) a conditional use permit for • • development of a new ten-story (95 foot) office/retail sales building; 2) site plan approval for renovation (including partial demolition) of an existing retail center on the subject property and for renovation of service areas (e.g., landscaping, ingress/egress routes, parking); and 3) a variance for the construction of a new private roadway to serve the development. The project Is located at Renton Village Center/South Grady Way. • • ' r J,_ i NOTICE OF PENDING SITE PLAN APPROVAL RENTON, WASHINGTON A Site Plan Application has been filed and accepted with the Development Services Division of the City of Renton. The following briefly describes the application and the necessary Public Approvals. DESCRIPTION: VILLAGE PLACE NORTH ECF;SA;CU;V-078-90 Applicant seeks: 1) a conditional use permit for development of a new ten-story (95 foot) office/retail sales building; 2) site plan approval for renovation (including partial demolition) of an existing retail center on the subject property and for renovation of service areas (e.g., landscaping, ingress/egress routes, parking); and 3) a variance for the construction of a new private roadway to serve the development. GENERAL LOCATION: Renton Village Center/South Grady Way PUBLIC APPROVALS: Environmental Review Site Plan Approval Building Permit The application can be reviewed in the Development Services Division located on the third floor of Renton City Hall. Comments will be accepted anytime prior to Public Hearings, during Public Hearings, or prior to an administrative site plan approval. For further information on the application or dates of final action by the City, please contact the Development Services Division;at 235-2550. • WPM: `'�' 'fu' H(saD PARK AND KIC6 /i 1--' -' b/ /� ' — 1 .ccw I I� `)50.MD All'14/15AI , _ -, wyar<cv+sc mmcN �� f ;, -_ a ve-r uwase:y- : \ , , ' .- 'R;-,-:-,,,-7 �' / rf' I (1AL♦ ,- Euuk 6/4N �� � /•s`f I EXhf<r z GE tA -,. i .-.. y A.31,,' ,5t-:rs) —Y ` ..ea,MN °LI e•{ /SRW60 ,- i, 1 'u$ II .J 4 r,� t r'"'4r `5 D N\`` .A© 4,... - 11 � I,- sc $t1fr,r w z } ? k net ..g;1.-„„?...:` . -.:,t._,_t�' 2i .�x7' 7• � r-un.c 4 R 7 J. `� �C� if ,F -J i E ..1l I rg,t V- / rr- j 4 J aw j6 ! 11 0 0 0 c-It <— PAIN a'•Vfo S,n xs' c ,, ,,,c ze 1 I Yp��f, '�1! +y+, {�'2. --, q ruw.1E6 AL{ .— , 1 ' 1• `.�V',,,h S+ ;k t�Y,444 . l: \\\\\\\\\\\\kv. . �/ JI,' �� `�,•SS h i'; <y -ral 1 I 1 rs1 1 is ..1 11'�H I.I , I l i .. \;FR,w',1 ¢w4�ra II(I11�cA.`\\A� s� \ , //O I `�.•__ - _. 1.-J ``\A I ?6E'4 Svc Alra.rAi.Y A4-..' V \\\ \\( 4" II ti , ~, , 6.�. .4T 7J /,4LF//////.lt - ;, I': - 1 G6N6KDd/UN6HA J\` N - - t • OF REA. 2 11 oflq 09g1. SE PI E." OF PENDING SITE PLAN APPLICATION DESCRIPTION : VILLAGE PLACE NORTH ECF;SA;CU;V-078-90 APPLICANT SEEKS: 1) A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT..„FOR DEVELOPMENT OF A NEW TEN-STORY (95 FOOT) OFFICE/RETAIL SALES BUILDING; 2) SITE PLAN APPROVAL FOR-RENOVATION (INCLUDING PARTIAL DEMOLITION) OF AN EXISTING RETAIL CENTER ON THE SUBJECT PROPERTY AND FOR RENOVATION OF.SERVICE AREAS (E.G., LANDSCAPING, INGRESS/EGRESS ROUTES, PARKING); AND 3) A VARIANCE FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW PRIVATE • ROADWAY TO SERVE THE DEVELOPMENT. GENERAL LOCATION AND/OR ADDRESS: RENTON VILLAGE CENTER/SOUTH GRADY WAY PUBLIC APPROVALS REQUIRED : • ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW SITE PLAN APPROVAL BUILDING PERMIT PUBLIC COMMENTS WILL BE RECEIVED BY THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT .ANYTIME PRIOR TO PUBLIC HEARINGS AND DURING PUBLIC HEARINGS. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CALL THE CITY OF RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT 235-2550 THIS NOTICE NOT TO BE REMOVED . WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION----- _ CERTIFICATION '/ 1Q0k " 444.0e ,r- HEREBY CERTIFYTHAT COPIES OF ABOVE DOCUMENT WERE POSTED BY ME IIV CONSPICUOUS ICES ON OR NEARBY THE DESCRIBED PROPERTY ON e�q► 001""sse®000 ATTEST: Subsc ®� • 5�O4,o�l ��� ibed and sworn to beforo:SS����S iti `;'�� ,.� Rotary Public in and for the State ofzla gtp�gTARY v' m. residing in m ° yam++ onathe Q day of (q4 o UBUC :S �f�{ cti 1017/�:G!VE9 � +040 411111 o'o©®oBOO®aaaS- o° _ /J pe Re o NOTICE 6' �TEO SEPiE�e� OF PENDING SITE PLAN APPLICATION DESCRIPTION : VILLAGE PLACE NORTH ECF;SA;CU;V-078-90 APPLICANT SEEKS: 1) A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR DEVELOPMENT OF A NEW TEN-STORY (95 FOOT) OFFICE/RETAIL SALES BUILDING; 2) SITE PLAN APPROVAL FOR RENOVATION (INCLUDING PARTIAL DEMOLITION) OF AN EXISTING RETAIL CENTER ON THE SUBJECT PROPERTY AND FOR RENOVATION OF SERVICE AREAS (E.G., LANDSCAPING, INGRESS/EGRESS ROUTES, PARKING); AND 3) A VARIANCE FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW PRIVATE ROADWAY TO SERVE THE DEVELOPMENT. GENERAL LOCATION AND/OR ADDRESS: RENTON VILLAGE CENTER/SOUTH GRADY WAY • PUBLIC APPROVALS REQUIRED : • ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW SITE PLAN APPROVAL BUILDING PERMIT PUBLIC COMMENTS WILL BE RECEIVED BY THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT .ANYTIME PRIOR TO PUBLIC , HEARINGS AND DURING PUBLIC HEARINGS. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CALL THE CITY OF RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT 235-2550 THIS NOTICE NOT TO BE REMOVED WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION ! .,. \� i CITY ,)F RENTON "' s.... Department of Planning/Building/Public Works •Earl Clymer, Mayor Lynn Guttmann, Administrator September 25, 1990 Loren Laskow Renton Village Associates 15 S Grady Way, #509 Renton, WA 98055 SUBJECT: Village Place North • CU;ECF;SA;V-078-90 Dear Mr. Laskow: We have received comments from Utilities noting that certain portions of existing utility easements will have to be released, and utility lines moved and placed within new easements in order to construct the project's on-site improvements. According to Utilities, the.easement release process is long and involved. If you wish to pursue this course of action,the following submittals are required and should be submitted as soon as possible: 1. Petition - per Ordinance No. 3857 2. Filing fee-$100.00 per each easement to be released. 3. Processing fee-$100:00 per each easement to be released. 4. Full copy recorded easement to be released. ' 5. Large 22"x 34" Exhibit Map, color coded showing: a. Existing easement; . b. Portion existing easement to be released; c. New easement; and d. Footprint of Office building, garage and retail shops. 6. All easements shall be drawn in their exact width calling out each bearing and distance and tied to point of beginning. 7. Individual sketch (8-1/2"x 11") for each easement release and new easement to be granted calling out width, distance and bearings, and pob stamped by reg. P.E. If you have any further questions, please feel free to contact me. . Sincerely, (Difif,r. E.,1, Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator c-,-...L _ n,.�4--..- xxr,,..1-,;.,,.+,,., oQncc - r')nK\ 72c-7K21 PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF RENTON CITY OF RENTON SEP 2 1 19 go MEMORANDUM DATE: September 19, 1990 TO: Don Erickson, Development and Planning Supervisor FROM: Arlene Haight, Property Managemen STAFF CONTACT: Mike Dotson, Engineering Specialist SUBJECT: Release of Utility Easements Village Place North 10 Story Office Building and Parking Garage Project We are in receipt of the proposed plans for the above referenced project and note that certain portions of existing utility easements will have to be released, and utility lines moved and placed within new easements in order to construct the projects onsite improvements. rThe easement release process is long and involved. We are suggesting the developer/owner be put on notice, that in order to initiate the release of easement process, the following submittals are required: 1. Petition-per Ordinance No. 3857 2. Filing fee- $100.00 per each easement to be released. 3. Processing fee- $100.00 per each easement to be released. 4. Full copy recorded easement to be released. 5. Large 22"x 34" Exhibit Map, color coded showing: a. Existing easement b. Portion existing easement to be released c. New easement d. Footprint of Office building, garage and retail shops. 6. All easements shall be drawn in their exact width calling out each bearing and distance and tied to point of beginning. 7. Individual sketch (8 1/2"x 11") for each easement release and new easement to be granted calling out width, distance and bearings, and pob stamped by reg. P:E. . ww/m/village/MDD/bh t . . . .. . • . • . • . . , __. . • ' , . . . . . . ..,.., , 'RAFT I i . . . • . . .:„.......:::,:,:,..,:,..,::::„...,..,:,„,„,,,:„:„:.................„.:::„.:.:....,,::::•....:....::..........:.......:..... ....• •.... ........•...:.......................................•....................................................... ..•.....""" " ...... •... .. .... .... • . . , , .. . :...::.....:.:..,:.i..,.:g:::....::::....,::......::....i:.n.::..i.::..:::.::.:.:..::..„„.::i:.:i........:g....:::.::.:::.:.:.,:i6..:m..,....i..,i.,.....i.,.:.i.,i,.:l..m,::.„:...i:i:•••i:•.g.:.......:...:N.....,......i.g....:i..:;„.. DEPARTMENT...•....s.:.......:.'...,.:i.•.......::..O.,:.........•...,..F?..........,...............•.,PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC i::::i::::i::::i:::i•:::i:ii•::ta••::••: 0Ri:.•:'i••:.:i••:':?•••::.:••:':::•••:.:1 KS TE9HN!9ALAP VS0RyC9MM1TrgE ::::::.1:::1::•::1i::i:*•::i*:.i..::1i::.1i':::1:i::::$.::*::::::$::::::::::i:::1i::::1::::%:1:::::.1:::'::::•:::1:.4::::V::::.•::::•::::i:::::i::::Ei::::.g::::::::::::::::::::::::::.:::::N::::::::•::,::::::•:::::::::U:::::::::::::::::::::.:::::*:::::::::':::,:::::::M::::::::.:::::::*':::::. .: • ••••••••.••••••••••••••••-•.••••:••••.•••••••• . ••••••• ••.• .•,..•- ••• .. .• . ....-.....-..z....-...::::::::::-..:::::.:±...........:......:...,......:.....................,.....,.:...:..:...•.• . :.....::. .•:...•..-,.7.-.....:,.....7.7..!.,..!•!..-.. .!Ai••!:::,:-..,•!..p.vv•••••••,:::::::•••••,,,::::...::::::::••••••••••••••:•:*:*:::::::::•••••::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::•::.*:.::.::.:i*:.*:.*::.*i*:.*:,::: . ............................................................ .. . ••.....:., ,.•...•. ••• ...•...••••••••,.....•••:,,,•••::,:::::::::::::::::::::::::::.•••••••:•:.:::K,I :::....-••,:::.•:::•:::::::::::::::::::•::::::••••:x.••••••••••:..i:•:::.:•:::•:::::::•:.:::::•*.:*••:::-•:.•::.::*:::::::::;;:::•::::::::::::* . . . . • 4.•••••••• •::::.......1.••fi: ::••:kA.Lipi,..,:.,......iiii....iii.i..........:,•-„................4........„....„ ..:„....i..........,..::::..::::::::::„.....-.......i.... .•.:::.::..m...,.. ......::i.••••••...•..••••••••••.:::.. ......••••• •••••.:i.:•••••••,.. .:•:*.....*,..„•. ... ..:::::.•,.,:ii::.:.•.* .i.:•:.:i:...::).:„...::::„.:••::i...;:i*:::i:i.:::i.:••••?::::.:.•:if::.•:.•:.:••?:::::•i:i*.., ... .-..,.... ....: ,......,,,,....T.11n . ...!1!.....7,...,...:.:. :.....:... .....:.. .. ::::::,,,:::::::::::•:::..„::::,•::::.,:::::::::::,:,,...,,,:.,:.:::::::::::: ::::,:::::::.,:.:::::.::: ::::::.::.m.::::::•:?:.::::::::::::::.::::.0.:::::::::i.::.::.:.:.:::::.:,.migniniiiiii.::::::: ::::::.::•::::?:.:K, :::::::0...::::::::::!.. .... . ...::.•:::::::4:::::::::•:-•:::::.:!•::::.:::: ::::::::.:::::„..:0:::::::::::::.:::::::::::,.::::::::::........:::,.....:::::....::::...::,.. ......:.....:•::::,:.::::.:::::::•:::::::•::::::.•: ,...,::::::..:0::::::.:::::,... .,....,:s.................:,........:::::.:.:,...,:::::::::::::::::v....a.:::::::mr. :•:::::::::•...m.i...i::::::in.:. . .. v .• APPLICANT:.,....:.::..:.::.:.:::•......................,.?... . ; ........;...;;.;.....7e....;n•..to•.•;n::::•m;•,•••;ilag:•:;•e•••.;:•..A••••••.st;••oci••a•.....t..:o•:::s?.;:::.:...:..:...:..::.:,*:i:f::::.::::::::::::::•::::::::::::.::E::::::g::::::::.::•::.:::::::•i:::•:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::*:•::•*:*.*i*:*:.*::::•:**:•i:*:::::i:::::::•::•::.:m::::::::i::•::::::::::::::•:i:i%i:::::::i1l1i.2: ' • , ..•• ::.:,,.n•.......:.::::•.:•.... .•.:.......:,..:„....:....:........,.....-,...........„,.::...:::::::.:::.::::::.:::::.•:.::..-.::::i.....:::::::::::......:.............::::•:.z.............:::::.: ::,:imii.iiiiii:::::::::•::::::::ali. , ....„...............,..........................................•. .... ..../......................„.........,..,.......,....,.,......,.......„,......,.:.........,...... .. ., .. . ., ....i,....,........, .. ....., ,......::.:„......,......:...::........,.......i,:::::::.:::::::.......::::::::::::::::::::.::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::.:::::::::::.:::::::::::::::•:.:p. . :. , . :. , .. , ....... . ...,..,..............:.:„.„...„.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::•::::::•:,:•::...........::::,i. F:„..:F......:...,0.:::.::...:..:jEC::„:„.......T..:....,..............N..............,.A M.............„E:....r.jr......:.„......'...... .... vip....rm' Place North :.:........::::::::::::...........:.:•.,..: ::::............:z.::.::.:::.:.::::::.::::::.:...:::.::.:::::.,..:.......i........• ..*::i'..... . .- ... ......: ..., . . ,: .......:::......::,:::::::::...!.................:,:i.. :.:i....,:.::......:...::::.::::::::::::::: ::::.::.::.:!.:.:: :.*:.::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::4 is......*::::::::.::....;:....'......s......•:.:.,....:,.:•••.:1:•.:':',.:',.:..ENVISONNAENTAL•CHECKLIST: :•'. :::ECF;SA;OU:V4)76-:99:.:::::::::::::: ::MN::::M::::ii::::::::::::::::.:M:i*:"""i""""""""""""":**.'il •:::•,....,,,,,,,,,,:::::::::::::,::::::::::::::::•:?:::::::::::::::..••:..:,.....:..i.:,.:::::•:,..:•,:......,:••: ••••• ... .:,- ...... .. ..„,....::....„,•,;:•:•.:,,,,,•,.:....::::,::„?.:.::•::::::,:::• .:: :0 :;:m.::::,miii:: :„•::::i.:::M:::••••:;a:ii:•:::.:P.: 1 .:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::•:•:•,........,,....••••::•:••.-:•.•,.....-•• .• .• • :•,•:•................:::::::::.;::.:...• •••••••-•-.•••• •..-.••.„ • :: : .• • • ..• • , , . • ..., ,••,., ,,...„:::•„:„....,„......,•,-............:::,,::::.,:,.::,..„-„,,,,,:::::::::.„,,,,,::::•:•••.•:•:•:•:•:::•:•:••••:••••••••:•:•:::•:::::::::::::!:::::::!•!:!•P•,::!:::::::::::•:::::::::::i....:1 ' S,...;•:::: : ::.:iii::*i:iii:.0ESOIIIPTION,I•OF...PROPOSAl.:: :' >Appircarit'.,• k.:. ::::::::::ii):::::' ........-..:..:.:.vi.::::::::'::"•:::::'::::::::::'"'""'"'"'..'''''.:":...:' ..........,.......,..................,.....„:::::.,::. .......„........................• :. .:... . ..• . . ......,. s ..::::.....:::...,.. .....i...p...:.:...: 9.9.....4...o.na):.:.::.u.s.e....:.::::pormJti:I.or • , :::••,....:•::::::::,,,•::::::::•::•••• •:•,•,:•:•::•:::::::::,....i opy...1..?pp..p.:.!-1t.,of...or...ipy,,,...tpti-story (95.foot) Office/retail':.6a10§:::tiulidIng;:i: ),:::$JWitilaty:approvaktoti :•:......:•:•:•:•:•:.:•:.:.::.:•:tonovdttotiliri.Olijaing.pdtti )demblition).".bf tr.i eii.s.::166ie611::8ent ::iin...:iii ,: 51 &::441; V. t18' • ii...........m... ..::.::.:::..........,,.....:...::„...„.....:::::::::i„.:.:.:.:::::...•.,........:::.••....... •,:............ -.•:• .., ..• •.....••••••.........:% ...i....t...,...........•. •.....•. •...Or..................-• ....till. e..t......••ti.•Olt.•:••••__1, lor„.::t-plovation.:....ot service areas.•(6.b :::•:.landscaping,• .:•:.....Ingress/egress.......:: ':.:466i6illi::6ar.:ibia11:I::::461.1..'3):::.:4:1 ,..::......:........:......:.....:„.::::.:,...:„...::.......6,,,,, ........:,..,..:.•:........••:.• .: :. .'. ...• ,-...........,............•:: .„.....:„..•:-....:.:......:...:.:„.....:,„..:.,.......,....,•,,..-.....-....:.:::...•••••••., va !:!i.....:....."........!... .!...p...9....:9?9...trttptipri of a.pow.private rOadWay,tOiterVe'tfie:ileVelogiiietiV:ax::;::.::::::?:".*K:.::':::*:::A ...,...........,:i.::::i:::::.::::::m•::::::•::,:::,::::„:•::,...,,::....::::,:::::::,•:::::•:::::::•::•:-....:.„:„::::••::::.•:::,..-.••••....,...,•:•;,„•.„.,•„,...::•,•:•.......:::::.:...„:•*::,::•:::,..„,,,,,:•-••••:•,,.•,,,,::::::::::::•,•:::•:•:•••••:•::::::::: :;•:::::::::•::::::-.:.-''''''''''''''''''''''''...i... ..:: :::'...:::::::::::.:::::::'.• ' .v..lis.:.......:.::: ::•.•.;:4;; ;; i:ii.,....kvii.....www::::::::::::iiii::::::::::::::::.::::::::::::::::::::::::.:::::::111 LOCATION:.0 E:s.PROPOSAL::'.::::::::.'-::::::::::: ::::*R6iiiati ••••••••••••::::::::::::::::::::::.:::::::::::•••.::::::::.....::•••••:::::::::'::••••,......:::::.•.,:.••••••••••,................,-.• .•....•..:••••• -.....I.•'...:.•.:.....••:...:•..................................J.1:... .9 ::•'.7'...P.:..1:1'...-:-!.-.../.:.!;.).:.9..1...t....i"-:....... .7.....T.:.YY. " Y.-:-...::::,::1.:'::::.::1:::::1:1:::::.1.::::::!.-.::..T.I.:::...1.-:::iii:::!:1::11!:.:1:::.::'..:111.. • . . . . , • , . ___.. . .. . . ... .. . . 4 I. . • . • . . . . . a . . . . . • . • • • • • • • • • . . . , . . •4 . . •••••• . . . • „,4". .,,,... , , • • . , *41ilitg• • „''' ,'' . ,/•'',''.<'', ..••••••• .....„., •. . Mc. • -- r- ............,' . ............"- s . • I '„---•-t • . , , , ...---- ,• . . _ ...• .....-- ..-- ..... -- . - 0 ---• . , • • „ ____, ,..-3-----.1--,_____ • I ' Witill' WI:. 17,1,..MbIrstr . , ..,- -----‹ -- 7.11. I . War 1.1-'• ,: .;, 1,1,10.1i•V•Vre .. ' 1.,-.._121=‘, L • !, ,,T,. . ( • ..• \ t _,!_. _,._, 1 • . A . • -•----...:,\ ; . ' \ii.t.Uki,:- '•• -.. ,r',.\\ \L":'--'.,. , . -•' ='-_'./; ; , s-' lAK AVV.4. , : . . ..• - .. . - . . • __...-- t:•:•_:,;•:-- i ...---, ,tc,;::::-A, 1."\eAs\,..4:4,\A' ':1 b• t--) - .. . 50.ND titriAT45111 t _ ..• . / .. I •• ---•-.::::- . ORAVY Wiy7;A`",...,, ..,...,,'"'""'.-.1r...- •\\II r : t2. \"•'• . i • ' . , . t , ..- • / :........----. ;..-- i . .,, 1 • ., . two. 7,_ ...--••--- ...--- .••,,..•-.--•-:, ..1'''' • '') • nE4 .....„ 01:1AC‘,,C,44...4..k.t../... • .-....--- • .,,,i1,... .....zi .......Y) ."...L...1"/ •••47;:il •L11.9 h 71 dr i'........ilirljt:I.91 : 11;•-•.' ......'.: '. . '7:-..-...::-.-... "' .."-r --.1. 11 ' .. • . .•-• -.- - . 4., . 611), . ....,..''..... '.. :A"t . . -,.- ....---_., ... 1 ;:.:. . . p ,,. •. ..,.;i.,_. • g. . . . :,,;),-,---,-,,- • • or ray , , ,• . ..--;r.-i:.:-•:::-). I, 7-7-.'\:iiill it: P n ,..-.71'.44':‘;iitli.i'..,'", F.„ ,s .....'... ...':4‘. . 0-_,_ --;-- ,, , . , ,..B s'•' -'.A".4:1-:.'i;;;:t4tc`%:`1...:1‘.3:.$41•1. ss 1 -I 4t6.-4 Alit . •fie;i1spen,.. ;"7 ( !err 11 .....- fr-- -----). ''-'''••. 4 4,";:t9.:•4'.rii4', :•f;•l'..i. (1 ! • .26.1pri..; .. ..,...kit' .. --; • . •; • ...i...-,,,r%f'.:,•.!tiiti.4.• :• • ‘•••rft.,4;,..S1 2.%!:! ,1 , . _ (7-4,,Tgv,...,-/Z:.::,,e,5..., .....,• . • ;.. , I :..........- --1 00fott I; :„ ..,; • ..-:• .#:•:.•A ._;-1: ,... r, . . 1,lr,sk.. ..:ft I--\ ii :I:. . .... ,;',1•.',:i 1 ...:',,I,,,,.'vzgr:1! . • ---- • .4ydiff•ft --.. -‘----7 , , • ,• . t._ i .. 1 " :••. 7.4-4:1‘.- • • .. ... : il....: : •• • ' '- 2:•,,, ,•'41 ' . -:-ja- J , . ..-)..i-,' - , .._ .1-9• • 1 '''',1.3:4j-.• `7.- - , ...I;I ' 11-;.s"..P'' 4.\.a..,Y-4...-T.,.....4; t' ,04***. ..". '7 • N(11.7'7 • 1, tiik.; I . ' : :, , : . il". ' -- 51. • .4.1i:V61‘':;•47•.'..te;'•.:`..4?.' 1:•"%rir: . -1;•• 2b.Y •••••• . 11 -•-•-•;.1"'';',41:11i::05";tt.,...1":1441 '-• i• •-•j---..-4;.. . .•'•' 1 ' •.; : t•t ...-.1 1 .;_ct .Ayr, - ,__,..„.„••--...T! ..,..-1-V1:77-...um-. '.•', ' 1.:rillw2"1•Ser A#4 iNgir-k• •,,....... . 3 • . ' ''... 4-w.1 1-45.? li .r ,tuill,i. ...44.., 1 / - '..:-1'74.4.0 k ..). . •1.'3-^r.r:..I. • \ 1 .7 ,. . . .., (.:.•• •..• .. ,,,17:irf7Ari.,. ' • '' - '''' . •A‘ ', It • - • - . ''.. '• • 1'./...1 • 'el - -Olirt;••rs:10-' 4 -,., .•• • .--• , -• . • IT 's I- ,t,• WIN'Who • '' • \ \7 1,41'101..t..,---=4:14- ."''''' 4 4 • -. •:13 '':: ! ' .." . 111:1'4 r'Or • • ; 1 .. ,,.....irs.K; ,i., . /L.:4'4.. "le' iv. ja., - ., \\.:•kg r.:.‘,. ;,..Sila,:. : • .• •...it; 1 t• ••ns • , L. / ... A, .•.* - -T./ • 13:•,;- - • . • ? ' --, • .• . •.• \ • • •Ii!.?":3:10 •s,,,,,' V•• 1 C\1. ; 7*. '' •A'''''''''•cy.• K !.• • - , • . ' '4;q14,1Ti ty*-11'•,' lt,` .. . ,, 7,.: • .4) U ,,• 1 ,_ . ,.. . 1. "-eff-•• . :.i-.•;- ...-• I- '''' [ft.,-& .3'. V . I 4 , *". • . 4 7'....__ --.. .0^ .• :2-.o., i- ... • • --"..... 4r..?;:."''.6- , ..'..•• • ..'," : : - • :1.".I I-- .,. I. . . , • • •Ci/ •-.. \: •. . .. '••. • . •'4)/4 I ' . t . . .• [/AC- ' • 1 •, ; -,..4.•5.,.......„..,....... rt ,., , • ,...._te 64191- I . ( • • • • • '•"UV.1 II 41C14,,,V.1 re • • -...--. •• • N «11. . - 4L .."'SY:- . • : s, •.-.. - • •, •. i •'-`;';-;:c. '..."' , - . '' ' '' N''• ' I i•tr.s....,,..r,,r. . . • . 11,• . '.i. T. • ... ••.4. .411. i.. , i • • • ---7 .4 . ' .0" a . - .• `.. .-.1.7ri-L-2LJ‘ L-._...1 N •. . - '-' . _ i . ' 5, RE.4.4TC,-1 Y1.14- 3 11444_ • , ,... .. • ,-, •., J .: .• • • . . .• . . • . • . ....... , .• . i , . , a•..• , .. (I- -.---..--:-At :1..-a--- . . - -. j •• ... .. • .-. • . • • • .... •. . . . X . ..' .•., .. . • • MX . .. . . • .• '•• , gl,) X(P/N ..'.-N ••.. . r147*. • I t--.----4-1 ' . -..rt.'...•----- : . I CU&MUM ft4kil 1 : .t:•-•••-", . \\•• 1. ' ' .. . , . ..• . i I . ic,ouc citiwAA I .--, ... . .. . • . • .. . . ,. .. . . . .. . , . . , . . , . . , . . , , . . • • .. • ' . ., . , . • • . , . • . . . . . . . . , • • • . , , - . - ' . . . . , . ,_.,___ _____________ _ __ •L__-•-,, . . 4_7//. I ' • i Ai ------------------L_____ _ _ la- ' . . 1 i . • , i i , i 4/11 i4V : . . , r /izoll j; (it, , , ' 1 P . • _,. i i frili,/a4104/V i ,- , , iyilta . 4,, imi,,1- -1 \ . , ____-_ 14 • I :------1 1 , I*" (;•72,,) -_-_- ______-_______---_-_ IrCfil ! • . • VILLAGE _ - _ '- • PLACE • NRI ORTH . -"-=.4 ::_..a +1{«IIa -- - • .' :.-.-. .. : - - — I 1 _ • ^ECG7CIr - - _ .. ._. - . s$�- --- - ... - I __ - ...�_..„;_�G...-....__ EArucEn wunileNa r, - ._ .._- _ ._ _,R�1 FN9N. - .._—__.. - I i _ - - _ • is 1 - - - --_.— - r iL s c: _ .� .H■■■ fs y/EsrieeAr _ _�- 111411 ! • -- reu.e /sr sm=r, . e■ ccD~ -.:_. — _ c:_ - r _ -. _r o7E c.e...rf ��Ec■5■Sial ®Bl�1 •�'^ _ J - _ ll�CR'L IiR 1l mauls ' . . .W.. ` I _ ��� h Ytt7 r�11 •.L. Y I - 9Nra.em==.eovr ' • EAST ELEVATION - y e'. ..,A• NORTH ELEVATION - - . . _ • ^ �T..E OAeE.•1L YD1E O"ALL K/�=E•4r4 t - ._- - - e. ' 1 .ter -----...II a - _ --s- , - .- -- .... _ - --- _ ■■iif�iEaBi •-:-R.. ..R a a' v,`"�* 1-- -�_ fT"t_1 1 - - - -- - - _ 7 .i; ._. „ram.-- - . i-I l j- t-t s 1 4,-.4, - • A'E-oKT ��{ . 1=.T► .... - . - -•�� .R' 1N 1�0l � _ Ecis_.____ .pur✓r>l -- -- - - - .•-�f�4:4-f-S-Y-I :M.-- t1-- eAv.,..N✓ �� t-- Q• '14'l14 1 l I "", ' 9=idIE lilll =aelill, a-' .- _ _ . -- - _ = F-- pp■_■�.-.._ $,m aaIY. uwL(OL. Iti-(A>T.e WEST ELEVATION - -. SOUTH ELEVATION sMm».w. - moms o' Color ELEVATIONS - .. Ca.i'.QE,c Tb "..fl✓JtD- _ - 1/..Ls .. - _ _ - ` Cr'ARfFYiO/YE 6-' -GE „LW MIME 347..2471=, G-LP ' - oJytX 51/7;R0.R/47E 1190,701- 6.89e `•.'''' -:. -.c _ • '_ _ _ .- /ILKYNT• Tb AE 6.14.MID •N.= - - . /f(.MT 461'-reE/,C. ATTACHMENT#10 - A4-. - VILLAGE -- - --- • �.-- 25X-c ` _.� as O r3.-0 fi ,Qb- ,_� { TT PLACE ■_� -O T ,_� �•� r »� t i i- I NORTHbi L �i i i . III RE`TOY,WASHLV4 ZO• N•■• • , . REASON L4L,GE SSOCUTFS la .. b Callizon r • 'R----",„,7L_TF:Iii.:-...,FEY 'D 1'-'----, z....7,--- -II i • n1 L- rEL _ - �� _ • 1 al - - TYPICAL FLOOR RAN �� i x k KI___ Y:",� _r.=�_;i.'-; •- •- F 7" = -_ ..'.-L • I vuaS '121ucE I • • III IVA 1. • ~' • • • • ' i —— PL.. u�..rt \ i I 1 1 11 I Sao... r �_ 1 - - �t��4tw _ I T T T I 1 j .ter • � c _ _ �'i SERVICE w sFavlr. twtool_ ,_------- i • .• . --- • I -PETAL 1' PETAL 2 FETAL I RETM.4 CETM.a FETAL a IETM.r PETM.. - IET1L f 1T • S• - I ...,.e..... �_—,_��_- .__. t'� FLOOR FLAN • - GROUND FLOOR PLAN 0, ... aa-te . . ._ ...... •........____ . . - . . _ _ •_ - • _ ATTACHMENT#8 A2 1 , — - -.._._ --1 E VII,LA PLACE • ,- - NORTH • ,wm RE TOI(.wASm G N V0. � i GiOf1 l If e / •� y . Z - / .Y Y.t LLB ;--�=f- • ''4€..-..M*TE - z.� =r _ - - !WE AM'Y ePIT -- O /)nano ... _ - - - irtrue c trRh[E uw'4t7 n c..s�.sr n e..r.,.s '4 G n zmee.ras'4 1s .vcu`'"77I 0,IY A.s.. e.ev-®••eE • i71,YE11J,. a.y. A—.. 7lrrs a y. 114, -v Ybaamav u..no . J. a- - ems -- Are u.a/w+avM i � - na I ....►t.X`NV.\\�n aglv \ r.:W.NW.' . r=-1_ - ;yn'- '• vofE e4i m -- d. ear•« 4':-.'M ..`. /J1 as... asl-. ii-.-?wG ,vt —may _ _ -- = ------� r - Omaw r vrlroN O — -- — —�. . 47I . My I I .--- I -Mt, ne �•m 7Fan.®euv..r..sd I ..... lack,' MKYi A,.[gt4IW Me i t car.- s sec-a). Povice[..w , I I• I 4 \y. Y _ sir- --, - — INL Cb GARAGE rTim.���_ ! �E ELEVATIONS , - e• A ��s raw alr*� ';� _____ 2- i �•—ix .-• . . , sue+ ii. - -.. ; . -.� t = •.: '21-• -y. - - /��-E fin --+..C.I ..`.. -� +fT e� 610 SL � s ��- VI' C = r - . tie wN iF v? - • ATTACHMENT#12 '�.' .�• � • • • Technical Advisory Committee Staff Report . • Village Place North • • September 7, 1990 • , • Page 2 • • • LAND USE • • 1. Whether the proposed development is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan? • The proposed renovation and development of an office/retail complex complies. with the . Comprehensive Plan Map designation of "Commercial Use" for the subject site, and is in compliance with relevant Goals, Policies and Objectives for commercial and office developments. 2. Whether the proposed development is consistent with the Land Use Map designation? • The proposed development complies with the Land Use Map designation for"Commercial Use" (B- • 1). • • • 3. • Whether the proposed development (including •new construction and renovations) is • consistent.with the Zoning Ordinance and other applicable regulations/standards? The proposed complex generally complies with applicable development standards for the • Commercial Zone, as well as those regulations established in the Landscaping Ordinance and the Parking and Loading Ordinance. Becuase the proposed office tower exceeds the existing height 'limit of 95 feet in the B-1 zone by approximately 38 feet, the project must go through conditional use approval. • Additionally,the development generally is consistent with criteria established for site plan approval, • conditional use permits and variances. • • 4. Whether the proposed development is consistent with vicinity land.uses? The subject property is currently developed with commercial and office uses, as Is property to the south, east and west of the site. Property to the north of the site is currenly zoned L-1 and developed with a Metro Park and Ride Lot. The site is convenient to major City arterials, a state roadway, and 1-405. In addition, it is close.to SeaTac and the Renton Municipal Airport. Staff believe that the proposed action is consistent with surrounding land uses and would.enhance the image and character of the surrounding area. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Whether the applicant has adequately identified and addressed the following environmental impacts likely to occur in conjunction with the proposed development? a. ' Land Use ' • • • Impacts: The subject proposal for some 260,363 sq.ft. of new, net rentable office space • and•'approximately 13,650 sq.ft.. of'new retail space on the first floor, as well as some 79,000 sq.ft. of remodelled space will, when combined with the office and retail space • already on the Renton Village Shopping Center site help anchor this southern edge of the •. . downtown as a strong commercial and retail node. Although on the edge of the downtown , • • 'proper, this node should help stablize the commercial) designated (comprehensive plan) • and/or zoned properties to the north. The proposed office tower itself would house approximately 800 to 1,000 new employees who would be likely to at least occassionally take advantage,of other 'retail uses and services in the area. It is also possible that some • retail activity,could be drawn away from the existing core Into this area because of its more • readily available off-street parking, more contemporary image,and critical mass. . Mitigation Measures: Because no specific adverse environmental Impacts on land.use have been Identified, 'specific land use related mitigation measures have not been recommended. • . Policy Nexus: Environmental Review Ordinance,4-6 • b. • Aesthetics - • • • Impacts: The subject proposal,as noted above, Includes plans for a new 10 story, mixed- use, office/retail building and a five story parking garage designed to house some 930 parked automobiles. Aesthetically, the new office building should be an attractive addition • • • Technical Advisory Committee Staff Report • Village Place North September 7, 1990 • Page 3 •, • • to the downtown, using a combination of painted concrete spandrels and blueish green tinted glazing, and porcelain tiles as an accent material for exterior surfaces at ground ' level and at the top of the building. To add visual Interest, the northwest corner of the building has been articulated in plan so that It breaks away from the standard rectilinear form of most contemporary office buildings.This, along with a somewhat sculpted top two floors, and an articulated first floor featuring a recessed arcade on the east face of the building, and a plaza on the south, should make this new building one of the more aesthetically pleasing office buildings to look at in the City. The proposed,new five-story,parking garage, which will be over 480 feet long along its eastern facade, will poise an architectural challenge to break down the apparant bulk of this large structure and integrate it thematically with the more suburban scale found elsewhere in the center. The architects for this project have attempted to break up the mass of the garage by indenting the corners of the garage closest to Grady Way, introducing some slight (depthwise) 30 plus feet wide recessed areas and stairwells, as " well as the Introduction of different materials and textures along different portions of the garage's facades. Along the street sides of the garage,larger (14-20 foot high, 4-6 inch calibre) trees are proposed to soften the "view from the street". The southwestern and eastern facades of the garage will more visible as smaller sized (2 Inch calibre) street trees; 30 feet on center, are proposed to mask the south end of the.garage and,only a narrow row of shrubs are proposed to screen the garage along Its eastern facade. It should be noted that approximately two thirds of this latter facade will be screened by the ten story office building, some 50 feet to its east. Some landscaping (11 flowering-cherry trees, of 2 inch calibre) is also proposed for the roof of the garage. In addition to these major new structures,approximately 11,000 sq.ft. of new retail space Is proposed In a two new retail spaces that will abutt either side of a new pedestrian pathway •that connect the new office building to the other major office buildings on the campus.The two new smaller retail areas will be located at the north end of Pay N'Save and the south end of Thriftway. In addition to this new addition the front of these existing stores (including Schumskys) will be faced with a new colunaded arcade that will thematically match that along the ground floor of the new office building. Aesthetically, staff believe that the office and retail portions of the project work well with one another because of their thematic continuity..As noted above, the office building Is , likely to be an attractive addition to the City's skyline, as well. Only the existing Ernst store and the parking garage would appear to have the distinction of not thematically"fitting In". • Becuase of its very dissimilar use, different floor to ceiling heights, and different engineering requirements, there is little, other than additional landscaping and some possibly greater articulation around the stairwells, little that can be done to dramatically change the appearance of the parking garage. On the other hand it would seem reasonable that a similar columnaded arcade like that In front of Pay N'Save, could be used to better Integrate the Ernst store into the whole complex. Mitigation Measures: Staff are recommending that more significant landscaping be provided around the southwestern and eastern facades of the five story parking garage and that consideration be given to developing'a matching columnaded arcade across the front of the existing Ernst-store so that it ties in better thematically with the whole complex. Policy Nexus: Environmental Review Ordinance,4-6 c. Noise, Light and Glare • impacts: Other than during the construction phase, impacts from noise associated with the proposed use are not expected to be great. Since there Is a nearby hotel, construction hours should be limited to regular working hours to protect the privacy of hotel guests. . • Reflective glare from the proposed 10-story office building Is not expected to be readily visible from major arterials or 1-405 where it could impact the vision of motorists. However, to confirm this, the applicant needs to prepare a reflective glare diagram for those hours and times of the year when reflective glare Is likely to be visible from the building. This is when the angle of the reflected sunlight is 30 degrees or less with the horizontal. Construction related light and glare, If known, should be mitigated. On site lighting will be screened to be retained on site. Mitigation Measures: The applicant is requested to prepare a solar glare diagram for those hours of the day on the equinox, summer,and winter solstices when the angle of reflected sunlight is apt to be at an angle of 30 degrees or less with the horizontal. • " • Technical Advisory Committee Staff Report . Village Place North •. 'September 7, 1990 , • • ,Page 4 . •Policy Nexus: Environmental Review Ordinance,4-6 . . d: Transportation • . ' , Impacts: The Transportation Systems Division has Indicated that there could be significant impacts on the transportation system_ from this project "plus the potential for future • projects".This division has advised that the applicant should provide a Transportation Plan • for the Renton Village area and that the findings of that study should be incorporated Into • • the Grady Way TBZ prior to site plan• approval. The applicant did complete a traffic analysis for their proposal which indicated,that the intersecton of S. Grady Way and Lake • Avenue S. be improved with improvements to the south leg of the intersection by widening it to allow two exclusive northbound left-turn lanes and a through right lane. • Mitigation Measures: Staff are recommending that the applicant prepare a more extensive . traffic analysis Including the Intersection of South Grady, Way/Benson Rd. at Main Avenue • S. and the whole of the Renton Village area prior to the public hearing for site plan , approval; and .that a Transportation Management Plan be 'developed for the new office/retail complex. In addition, staff are recommending that the intersection of S. Grady• Way and Lake Avenue S. be improved as proposed in the applicant's Traffic Study. • Policy Nexus: Environmental Review Ordinance,4-6, , . e. Public Services/Utilities . (1) Emergency Services , Impacts: if built;pursuant to code the subject proposal is not anticipated to have • significant adverse impacts on fire services. Fire Prevention has instructed that the • • office tower must comply with all"high rise requirements". - Police have reviewed the project and believe that more information is needed on the security provisions that will be In place in the parking garage to ensure . • security. Staff-are recommending that security provisions acceptable to the Police Department;be agreed to prior to the public hearing for site plan approval for this project. Mitigation Measures: That the applicant provide a security plan,acceptable to the • Police Department, prior to the public hearing for site plan approval. Policy Nexus: Environmental Review Ordinance,4-6 - ' (2) Storm Water Management • Impacts: The proposed development can be incorporated into that existing . system effectively, however,,special measures may be required to achieve the , • necessary levels of service to the•development and necessary levels of protection • to the subject property (and'neighboring sites)as,a result of the fact that portions ' of the site are subject to flooding during the rainy season., • Mitigation Measures: Because of,the threat of flooding to the site during heavy . • , • rains, staff are recommending that the applicant develop a storm drainage and .• flood protection plan acceptable to the Storm Drainage Section, prior to the public hearing for site plan approval. In addition, the applicant is required to provide a •. "hold harmless",letter (accepted as .to form by the•City. Attorney) prior to the • • issuance of any building permits for this project, Policy Nexus: Environmental Review Ordinance, 4-6; Storm Water and Surface • , Water,Drainage Management Ordinance. ' • (3) Recreation . impacts: . The subject property is proximate to passive recreation activities'(e.g., 'picnic tables, movie theater) on (or adjacent to) this site. Additionally, Burnett ' , ,Linear Park is nearby. In order to ensure an adequate range and quantity•of • recreational opportunities to employees and users of the Center,the applicant has proposed quarter mile long walking/jogging path around the parking structure , .which is to include a couple of stretching.and exercising stations..Staff believe • • Technical Advisory Committee Staff Report . . • . Village Place North . September 7, 1990 Page 5 • consideration should be given to extending the exercise path around the whole site and that the applicant should be asked to provide an indoor exercise room and shower facilities for future employees. , . Mitigation Measures: That the applicant extend the exercise path around the whole facility so that it.becomes a more usable and Integral part of the project area, and that the applicant be asked to provide an indoor exercise room and shower room for employees. • Policy Nexus: Environmental Review Ordinance,4-6; Comprehensive Parks Plan. • f. Construction • • . Impacts: Standard construction Impacts,are anticipated•In conjunction with proposed 'demolition, renovation and development of new buildings. Particular care will be needed . to mitigate noise, traffic, dust and debris impacts ,to persons working on/using "functioning" portions of the subject development, and to. those travelling to and from nearby office and commercial facilities. • Mitigation Measures: That the applicant develop a Construction Management and Mitigation Plan that addresses hours of operation, hauling routes, staging areas, employee . • and contractor parking; erosion:control, and the disposal of hazardours materials associated with construction: Said Plan shall'be acceptable to environmental and plan. ' review staff in the Public Works Department and shall be prepared prior to the public hearing on site plan approval. • Policy Nexus: Environmental Review Ordinance, 4-6 • • • C RE OMMENDATI .. .............. ..C.. .. ONS` • : .,. Staff recommend;th th .:ERC .ssue..a..Determin o : . of Novi=Significance:.-.:<Mitigated:wtl aL 03igootionm discussed abover<::: :. :: . ....::...:.:.:..::.:.:..::..::.::.::. ::::...:: : :> • • OM M ENTS D.F.REV.IEWING:'DEPARTMENTS:: <:.;;:;: i :.:..:..::;:Various•:Cit departments have.reviewed and commented:U on.the: ro ect These cotmotifs" :as:follows:• .. • ;•.: • • • LAND USE • • Police Department: See attached memo. . • Fire Prevention Bureau: Must comply and' be constructed to high rise requirements. Fire flow of 1,500 fs required. Two' hydrants with a minimum flow of 1,000 gpm is required. • Primary hydrant is to be 150' of structure. Secondary hydrants are to be 300' of structure. All other normal . code.requirements are necessary. • • Transportation Systems: • See attached memo. • Parks and Recreation: Development should Include participation In a voluntary • 'recreational improvements in the area. Note; These improvements will serve users and employees of the building. • Building Division: 'No Building code check done. . • • Long Range Planning: Project. supports Intensification of existing • • office/commercial center. Building elevations are very unclear., What is the City getting if approve this project? Technical Advisory Committee Staff Report Village Place North September 7, 1990 Page 6 • ENVIRONMENTAL Police Department Impact is tied to parking structure security and eventual tenants. Building may have only a minor Impact, but that Is Impossible to determine at this point. Fire Prevention Bureau: Minor impact to public services. ' . 1 Transportation Systems: This project, plus the potential for future projects, will have serious consequences for the transportation • system. See attached review comments. Parks and Recreation: Recommend the proponent review the proposed Parks Comp Plan and Proposed Trails Master. Also the proponent speaks to a trail systems in the development and the plans do not show such. The Plaza area will serve the communities interest, I.e., restaurant. Recommend the proponent investigate the on-site and off-site impacts for the employees. The site Is sufficient to incorporate an on-site trail and pedestrian system. • Building Division: Minor housing impact. Long Range Planning: Project will have impacts upon views from surrounding neighborhoods (significant?) and traffic. Traffic study . looks good but should be verified by Traffic Engineering. High'water table (7.5' see Geotech) seems to need " , • special mitigation. Final approval of FAA would be good, only document on record seems to be a denial of earlier application. ' • r • • • • • • iii City:of Rent tit : :: : : > : >:: : `: :< ':: � ::,*::;h ...................... . . ..... .... ::. . : tiitte :<: :::: : :< : �< :::�: < : ; : • September 7, 1990 To: Gregg Zimmerman Rubin Yu Glen Gordon Sam Chastain • Penny Bryant Jim Hanson From: Don Erickson, Chairman e ate a temb . . .19 .Iii:e ;:0.A•,. :> : : � ;: : > M:..Mi « > >> ��>>� < >� > > : ii .........:.:.::::::::: :Loc ti• nE;:;>: : ;z';`; :Third::Floor ;.onfere:nce::f I Cll ;;:;; ;;:: :�::::< :>:: ?: :::::<::::;: ;<::`: ::;>::::> :: Agenda is listed below. • TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE • AGENDA ' SEPTEMBER 7, 1990 • Third Floor Conference Room ' . Commencing at 8:30 AM • TIME/KEY PARTICIPANTS NEW PROJECTS VILLAGE PLACE NORTH • CU;ECF;SA;V-078-90 Applicant seeks: 1) •a conditional use permit for . • development of a new ten-story (95 foot) office/retail sales building; 2) site plan approval for renovation (including partial demolition) of an existing retail center on the subject property and for renovation of service areas (e.g., landscaping, ingress/egress routes, parking); , and 3) a variance for the construction of a new private • roadway to serve the development. • • • • L. • .r a j�• •• . . ,.1, . • yx r.i• ir • .. .. • :' a1S� - S� • August 8,1990 . • • • Callison Village Place North • Architecture Area and Parking Calculations • Programming - Planning Interior Design • Graphics 1. . AREA OF BUILDING Bldng.Gross Off. Gross Net Office* • Core • Ret Gross Eff. • Floor 10 28,171 28,171 25,339 2,832 89.9% Floors 2-9 (8)30,219 (8)30 219 (8)27,387 (8)2.332 90.6% • Floor 1 35,38) 20214 15,928. 4,286 15,144 78.5% Total 305,283 293,137 250,363 .29,774 15,144 89.7% 2. PARKING - • • A. Office 1302 cars 5 cars 260,363 net sf* = 1000 net sf' (or gross leasable) . REQUIRED: PROVIDED: 1302 cars 1302 cars • •521 compacts(max.) 359 compacts • B. Retail 15,144 new building 11,100 new infill • 4,100 Schumsky's • 1,804 vacant 15,000 Tradewell 20,000 •Pay N Save . 27,000 Ernst 94,168 gross x.9=84,751 net sf' • 466 cars • -55 cars • • •. • • . 84,751 net sf' = . • 1000 net sf* REQUIRED: PROVIDED: 466 cars 466 cars 140 compacts,(max.) . .125 compacts • *net sf= "Gross Leasable." 1420 Fifth Avenue • Suite 2400 • Seattle.Washington 98101 (206)623-4646 • FAX:(206)623-4625 1. 1 IF REVISIONS MUTED WITH PREVIOUS PLANS AND COMMENTS. GREEN NO. C O 54 0 7 —T 0 CITY OF RENTON BUILDING DIVISION PLAN REVIEW ROUTING SLIP DATE 1 2C— APPLICANT: • 5 a r or JOB ADDRESS: / 5 5. G i 4 P W 4 y NATURE OF WORK: 5 r L-A t L(C,¢1/®7'( TO,: Comments Due Comments Due 1 1 FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU 1 I BUILDING CODE REVIEW � 74.WATER SYSTEMS 1 1 ENERGY CODE 1 1 SEWER SYSTEMS 1 1 STORM DRAIN SYSTEMS. 1 1 TRANSPORTATION DIVISION 1 1 PLANNING DIVISION 1 1 OTHERS 1 1 MECHANICAL Comments/suggestions should be provided in writing. Please provide comments to the Building Division by 5: 00 p.m. on above date. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION MN VL,(i(i I APPROVED I I APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED W o; Elk/44/ l 11/410 �i � f�� u(otap IN O 4/ /o-/(L/G-,� G(' 14Tr4c/74/w foil -76A 1°1-4N ( 47Pt ,- gg V) . WE EGofl/-c NO 7 f4T /VP/( c�4Nt- s v p ION EDsc/GN r�= ,—(N w ( 7`N p Evti_c S V(c ss p// o& 7T) P (=s/6-N p ,- `0/q0p0 5 U Tic I rit(K(e)-ke: Syspy . } 1RA i33 + ��11:4 006� L Z d3S - \ , 1re.. J\ No hau do ulo NOISI/UQ ONINNtljci Wtc(-)k- . :4\u/kt on a 10 M, sheer', Q� ,l 1 .. I��r�/I/ .1 ��// 'f� DATE T--2 7—7c Si nat'rire ff bi Eor or Authorized Representative g � � P forms#2 :pinrev CDVbld022(2/13/90) d' ., . ,FEE APPLICATION: Ep DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET CI ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET E PLA REVIEW ROUTING SLIP OTHER APPLICANT: �%6644. 4,/ - D TE: ?-44 09O JOB ADDRESS: NATURE OF WORK: ` _.4.. .._,__ PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 'yap. 44.7 DATE RECEIVED If el 1 / Comme/n Due BY PROPERTY9MGMT. Comments or suggestions regarding this application should be provided in writing. Please provide comments to the Comm. Dev. Dept. (C.D.D.) by 5:00 p.m. on above date. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION c3$t.d4 E cEES APPLIED CANNOT APPLY FEES 0 LEGAL DESCRIPTION 44 �/1,0 NEED MORE INFORMATION ❑ SQUARE FOOTAGE ❑ FRONT FOOTAGE ._..././e/4 Q-/9...9d 26414447 ❑VICINITY MAP It is .the intent of this development fee analysis to put the developer/owner on notice, that the fees quoted below will apply to the subject site upon development of the property. All quoted fees are due and payable at the time the construction permit is issued to install the on-site and off-site improvements (i .e. underground utilities, street improvements, etc.) LATECOMER AGREEMENT - WATER PROJECT COST LATECOMER CITY HELD NO PER. FTG. FEE PRIVATE DEVELOPER HELD .0.— LATECOMERS AGREEMENT - SEWER CITY HELD PRIVATE DEVELOPER HELD "® — Q -- SPECIAL UTILITY CONNECTION CHARGE - WATER Single family residential dwelling unit $300/lot x UNITS SUCC FEE Apartment, Condo each multi lex unit 175 ea. unit .x Commercial/Industrial $. /sq. ftie aa6 . of property x 1�.76o02i `no SPECIAL UTILITY CONNECTION CHARGE - SEWER � • 9� Single family residential dwelling unit $300/lot x Apartment, condo, each multiplex unit $175/ea. unit x Commercial/Industrial $. s .ft. of ro ert x of rvie. . No SPECIAL ASSESSMENT D STRICT (Hospital. Area) WATER UNITS SAD FEE DEVELOPMENTS WITH 1500 GPM F 'E FLOWS OR LESS: Area Charge $0. 1. 4 p: sq.ft. x Frontage Charge \. 6.00 per front ft. .x DEVELOPMENTS WITH GREA `?' THAN 1500 GPM FIRE FLOWS: Area Charge $0 48 �'er sq.ft. x Frontage Char a $18. 10 per front ft. x SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT (Honey .Crk. Intercptr) .- SEWER UNITS SAD FEE AREA CHARGES: Residential d -fling its, apartments or equivalen ► ; $ 0 per dwelling unit x- Commercial deve ,op ,=nt: $.05 per sq.ft. ' gross site area x FRONT FOOTAGE CHARGE $37.19 per Frit F'� (on ea. side) x $74.38 per fr.ft. (p 'ttv .on both sides of imprv.) x _, p .. TOTAL: s I/5018pl. The above quoted fees do NOT include inspection fees side sewer permits, r/w permit fees or the cost of water meters. , , - 6,a14-uti. Li .• ,: 9 / -, q Signature of Director or Authorized Repr• • tative •„...oij • • • RENTON,PLANNING DIVISION DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET • ECF-075-90 APPLICATION NO(S).: CU;SA;V-078-90 PROPONENT: • Renton Village Associates ,,.• : PROJECT TITLE: Village Place North BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PRO,JECT:, Applicant proposes to construct a new 10-story ,. , office/retail building requiring a Conditional Use Permit since building will exceed 95' in height. The proposal also includes renovation of existing retail center and existing drives,demolition of a portion of the • existing retail, renovation Of landscaping and.lighting. A variance will also be needed to construct a new private street. LOCATION: Renton Village Center, S Grady Way TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT , SCHEDULED ERO'DATE: ENGINEERING DIVISION V . TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION , SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT IVV •• COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT . , .• BUILDING DIVISION PLANNINGADIVISION CURRENT PLANNING • LONG',FIANGE PLANNING PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THISAPPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5:00 P.M. ON AUGUST 2, 1990. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: APPROVED , APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED ,;•, . , V V (017A"74171,,,M • , . , 0661, 6 I, lir, . , ' NOiNI dO A110 • ! NOISIAIC1 ONINNVid • • DATE: SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR'OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 5/90 RENTON PLANNING DIVISION't ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW:SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: 1 DATE CIRCULATED: 7/12/90 :'— COMMENTS DUE: 8/2/90 EFC-078-90 - APPLICATION NO(S): CU;SA;V-078'-90 PROPONENT: Renton Village Associates PROJECT TITLE: Village Place North' BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT::-Applicant proposes to construct a new 10-story office/retail building requiring a Conditional Use Permit since building will exceed,95' in height. The proposal also Includes renovation of existing retail center and existing drives, demolition of a portion of the existing retail, renovation of landscaping and lighting. A variance will also be needed to construct anew private street. LOCATION: Renton Village Center,,S Grady Way SITE AREA: 14.0028 acres .: . BUILDING AREA(gross): 253,167 sq. ft. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS: PROBABLE . : PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth ' 2. Air {' 3. Water 4. Plants 5. Animals 6. Energy&Natural Resources:,:,•. 7. Environmental Health 8. Land &Shoreline Use 9. Housing 10. Aesthetics 11. Light&Glare • 12. Recreation 13. Historic&Cultural Preservation 14. Transportation 15. Public Services 16. Utilities . COMMENTS: • We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Director or Authorized'Pepresentative Date Rev.6/88 o���. . 6s RENTON PLANNING DIVISION 'C�.. �990 DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF-078-90 APPLICATION NO(S).: CU;SA;V-078-90 PROPONENT: Renton Village Associates PROJECT TITLE: } Village Place North BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant proposes to 'construct a new 10-story office/retail building requiring,,a Conditional Use Permit ,since building will exceed 95' In height. The proposal also includes renovation of•existing retail center and existing drives, demolition of a portion of the existing retail, renovation of,landscaping•and lighting. A variance will also be needed to construct a new private street. . LOCATION: Renton Village Center, S Grady Way . TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: ENGINEERING'DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION - i SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES'ENb: DIVISION . FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU- 3, . : POLICE DEPARTMENT' : .••i:,?',•.%: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING bIVISION'' PLANNING DIVISION CURRENT PLANNING • LONG.RANGE PLANNING PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT 1' OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS*APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5:00 P.M. ON AUGUST 2, 1990. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: Lp G7) ' APPROVED ` APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED Fg-,95EZ.71— gv A, Y TS l k�, �i cAriZaJ dc� ext Svi c. oArtCv/ s-creci Le7 _. o Cv : '�-L-aVi4�? 5. .:Afz UeL4 c LL he, .. . �I-tA�' l S (A7r { C .171 N-5 ' IF:{a+PPf JIT Y IS ?2 os t • "l • DATE: S c fa SIGNA U OF DIRECTOR'O,R AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV.5/90 , • i3 . RENTON PLANNING DIVISION ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: . l P e-Pla- ` I .. DATE CIRCULATED: 7/12/90 f • ; ,;k: • COMMENTO DUE: 8/2/90 EFC-078-90 • APPLICATION NO(S): CU;SA;V-078-90 t ,• • • PROPONENT: Renton Village Associates ' PROJECT TITLE: Village Place North • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:,.Applicant proposes to construct a new 10-story office/retail building requiring a Conditional Use Permit since building will exceed 95' in height. The proposal also Includes renovation of existing retail center and existing drives, demolition of a portion of the existing retail, renovation of landscaping and lighting. A variance will also be needed to construct a new private street. LOCATION: Renton Village Center,'S.Grady,Way. • SITE AREA: 14.0028 acres • BUILDING AREA(gross): 253,167 sq.ft. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS: PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY • 1. Earth - • 2. Air • 3. Water • 4. Plants 5. Animals 6. Energy&Natural Resources 7. Environmental Health • . ," 8. Land &Shoreline Use ' 9. Housing 10. Aesthetics 11. Light&Glare 12. Recreationv. 13. Historic&Cultural Preservation . 14. Transportation 15. Public Services • 16. Utilities COMMENTS: { ` Pr-aseat wl�c L-t•PO r t�PAt�S of oN rak9s inn s t' i,pi 4- '> D 601 . AcgL 571..1)1 MKS cpwo> & - Jch�v�p e' Fie Y lcZ.' • CN(91 Pees-t 1.)Cv: 1, i.04- C js k, ALE 67,s'$. Gwrre.K sus ro D►J D mks. ;AbatiroL. u•[ APPu0ti-no0 . We have reviewed this application•With particular attention to,those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. AL.e . . „ 7/ 4�90 Signatu o Director or Authorized•Representative Date • Rev. 6/88 • RENTON PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF RENTON RECEIVED DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET JUL 1 2 1990 BUILDING DIVISION ECF-078-90 APPLICATION NO(S).: CU;SA;V-078-9u PROPONENT: Renton Village Associates PROJECT TITLE: Village Place North BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT Applicant proposes to construct a new 10-story office/retail building requiring"a Conditional Use Permit since building will exceed 95' in height. The proposal also includes renovatiOn of existing retail center and existing drives,demolition of a portion of the existing retail, renovation of landscaping and lighting. A variance will also be needed to construct a new private street. LOCATION: Renton Village Center, S Grady Way TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: ENGINEERING;DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG.:DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION,BUREAUi.i„, POLICE DEPARTMENT- ' COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING iDIVISiON PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF FENTON PLANNING DIVISION CURRENT PLANNING JUL 2 0 ";990 LONG RANGE PLANNING', PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5:00 P.M. ON AUGUST 2, 1990. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED 44/4 et,e/CD/4/: dja , DATE: 77a2e2 SIGNATURE I ECTOR OR AUTHORIZ REPRESENTATIVE _ REV. 5/90 • ,----, RENTON PLANNING DIVISION ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: -:', i , DATE CIRCULATED: 7/12/90 '1:k:,',' "-:., i- :.; '-''' < COMMENTS DUE: 8/2/90 EFC-078-90 4 :. ;. i''', i:;• APPLICATION NO(S): CU;SA;V-078L96' :: PROPONENT: Renton Village Associates::, :;:"•., --: " PROJECT TITLE: Village Place North • '!' BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:,AppOCant proposes to construct a new 10-story office/retail building requiring a Conditional Use Permit since building,will, exceed 95' in height. The proposal also includes renovation of existing retail center and existing drives, demolition of a portion of the existing retail, renovation,of landscaping and lighting. A variance will also be needed to construct a new private street. LOCATION: Renton Village Centerii•S'Gr,adyWay . , < SITE AREA: 14.0028 acres . BUILDING AREA (gross): 253,167 sq.ft. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS: PROBABLE ' PROBABLE MORE MINOR ; MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY ' -;- '--, 1. Earth .:.. ; . 2. Air 3. Water 4. Plants . • , , 5. Animals , ' .. . 6. Energy&Natural Resources 7. Environmental Health 8. Land &Shoreline Use 9. Housing 4----- . , 10. Aesthetics :. 11. Light&Glare . , Yrf 12. Recreation :: , 13. Historic&Cultural Preservation ' 14. Transportation 15. Public Services 16. Utilities COMMENTS: We have reviewed this application'With particular,attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or ar,.s here additionainformation is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Director o • •r orized:Ftepresepfative , Date 1 ,: < Rev.6/88 + • RENTON PLANNING DIVISION - • ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW'SHEET ��`� � A Z. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: 1� kS k 7990 DATE CIRCULATED: 7/12/90 a ., y.;; "r' s COMMENTS DUE: 8/2/90 EFC-078-90 APPLICATION NO(S): CU;SA;V-078-90 , PROPONENT: Renton Village Associates PROJECT TITLE: Village Place North ;: BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:: Applicant proposes to construct a new 10-story office/retail building requiring a Conditional Use Permit since building'will exceed 95' in height. The proposal also includes renovation of existing retail 'center and existing drives, demolition of-a portion of the existing retail, renovation of landscaping and lighting. A variance will also be needed to construct a new private street. LOCATION: Renton Village Center;S GradyWay;--° SITE AREA: 14.0028 acres BUILDING AREA(gross): 253,167 sq.ft. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS: PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth „ 2. . Air • 3. Water • • • 4. Plants 5. Animals • 6. Energy&Natural Resources 7. Environmental Health 8. Land &Shoreline Use 9. Housing 10. Aesthetics 11. Light&Glare f 12. Recreation V_.. 13. Historic&Cultural Preservation 14. Transportation 15. Public Services 16. Utilities • COMMENTS: f y`� �✓�a /�,�,_,, GGc� �nerO roo GLI, L. - otv yv—w.e w7—a ... ' i,o -,a-- 4 -moo-/-- .4-1.) A- - • o 1"%4Lee , .Q ,y, a Y-e_ ///74, We have rev'-wed this application.with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of . oe.ble impact or areas,where,additional:information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Director or Au orize,,,.=Representative Date • ( �' ' • Rev. 6/88 - • ` O .RENTO,N PLANNING DIVISION DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF-078-90 APPLICATION NO(S).: CU;SA;V-078-90 PROPONENT: Renton Village Associates ' PROJECT TITLE: Village Place North BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:,=. Applicant proposes toa construct a new 10-story office/retail building requiring a Conditional Use Permit'since building will exceed 95' in height. The proposal also includes renovation of existing retail center and existing drives, demolition of a portion of the existing retail, renovation of landscaping and lighting. A variance will also be needed to construct a new private street. LOCATION: Renton Village Center, S Grady Way TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERG DATE: • ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU;,, POLICE DEPARTMENT:,,, . ;• ; , • COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION,:. :. CURRENT PLANNING LONG RANGE PLANNING V PARKS AND RECREATION.DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS.TO.THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5:00 P.M. ON AUGUST 2, 1990. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: T k-S APPROVED „�.�. , . %PPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED Div w.n4 eyr-- Gjf-(®vc,D Nac pg_rt 001 A �R6 r&`/'1 ime6212vt419,7vry //-( ET/ ,( �07-. . v(e-p . t . DATE: 7"2- SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR R AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 5/90 RENTON PLANNING DIVISION ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: tot DATE CIRCULATED: 7/12/90 COMMENTS DUE: 8/2/90 EFC-078-90 APPLICATION NO(S): CU;SA;V-078-90 PROPONENT: Renton Village Associates ,, D,RAFT PROJECT TITLE: Village Place North • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant proposes to construct a new 10-story office/retail building requiring a Conditional Use Permit since building will exceed 95' in height. The proposal also includes renovation of existing retail center and existing drives, demolition of a portion of the existing retail, renovation of landscaping and lighting. A variance will also be needed to construct a new private,street. LOCATION: Renton Village Center,_S.GradjiWay SITE AREA: 14.0028 acres '`" BUILDING AREA(gross): 253,167 sq.ft. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS: PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION • IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth 2. Air • 3. Water 4. Plants 5. Animals 6. Energy&Natural Resources 7. Environmental Health 8. Land &Shoreline Use 9. Housing 10. Aesthetics 11. Light&Glare 12. Recreation 13. Historic&Cultural Preservation 14. Transportation 15. Public Services 16. Utilities (� COMMENTS: f, PRozr_cr . 75 'Psi 17-9F " (oO.-Yrf:4/2 _k'G'oOD`°G4/l\l) "tr�iGl/9 44410 PEs(Gty,47roN ANi .`CfifjTr'j.� CF�ir� a �� 2. Stre (5 'Wo7 . jN: l�f, S /�tiI/ ' ti/e)Re'TO//U/zi 3 s/rt= /5 N07 . jN Apt �oN� 9, S fr-E 15 (si r/ 4/ 0—r- 11-4- C G 46-42 Tory S/iy s. Fxi577 A/G- i'"m, !1?'T1/Q Y 5'F w s q r- 4 /gi�.,g,e-6, - Fog CoWC NA /7oN WWov6-rfovT SIFF. We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have Identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. 4%, 09. 60/0//i.i.ttifra/v-) lAv,ic. 5 I- O./ /776 Signature lirect Authorized Representative Date Rev. 6/88 3;' , gg • PLANNING DIVISION 1 CITY OF REN D TON RENTON PLANNING DIVISION JUL 1 2 1990 SEP - 7 1990 Cu I Y OF RE0/ vie. DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET PUBLIC WORKS RECEIVE" CUSTOMER SERVICES ' ' ` :�: ECF-078-90 k .,:.;: ;. I APPLICATION NO(S).: CU;SA;V-078-90 PROPONENT: Renton Village Associates PROJECT TITLE: Village Place North BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:-• • Applicant proposes to construct a new 10-story office/retail building requiring a Conditional Use Permit since building will exceed 95' in height. The proposal also includes renovation of;existing retail center and existing drives, demolition of a portion of the existing retail, renovation of landscaping and lighting. A variance will also be needed to construct a new private street. LOCATION: Renton Village.Center, S Grady Way . TO: Zadi PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: ENGINEERING DIVISION .. TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU:..:: POLICE DEPARTMENT. , COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT . BUILDING DIVISION,;; • ;. PLANNING DIVISION:• CURRENT PLANNING LONG RANGE PLANNING PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS /�/'��✓ COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5:00 P.M. ON AUGUST 2, 1990. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: u'I>1111 ' APPROVED :.:..APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS //NOT APPROVED 2. PM61"/NG5 ' H4L'L • 2Z ',r 3 y" 5c,¢G./= /'!-= 2G' po /94 O T/L 17Y 2, 4PPcic,'FTf Me 57- O#T'/N riy r=/YT Rae-e-4-SFS Fog 61,47 L l Ntt5 15 ab& --L/NF s iviy/cry 4/F 7 c, ME AO,4 N 0?5! D IVD/aiQ ! 'oli'c 3, Gocc_ oil. 5 /y. 74Nk. G '� Poti /9-NO 5o fL 4945_,-754/97iQry y, ALL co ,e_,b :.LVe45 /N f4/ t1/N/G G- 4-/4 e- e&/44. 13/71 ,0/4.IlYN/-74 T6 54N(71A( Y.9!=Gv , IN gT4cL O/c.%rv/7.T�-4 SFdo 1'4-%o12 au/Tr/ );10.55 5/ './i4 Ote • GA G/: //q S 5/f» 9�,-� J '•/t1�S ' li/vE' M/N(JLi im 2 °% z.,c)G0/�(/ �Q 5(-o/61/= aA $ � 5 FIrF_!d P ,tiQ7,G nn,/n. �j fri e ;l�Y-- DATE:2 DATE: (5"'/a —?C2 SIG ATU F D ECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE • REV.5/90 • t'• Ni- - RENTON PLANNING DIVISION ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: "TS6/11 DATE CIRCULATED: 7/12/90 COMMENTS DUE: 8/2/9O EFC-078-90 APPLICATION NO(S): CU;SA;V-078-90 PROPONENT: Renton Village Associates • PROJECT TITLE: Village Place North . . , . BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant proposes to construct a new 10-story office/retail building requiring a Conditional Use Permit since building will exceed 95' in height. The proposal also includes renovation of existing retail center and existing drives, demolition of a portion of the existing retail, renovation of landscaping and lighting. A variance will also be needed to construct a new private street. LOCATION: Renton Village Center,.S Grady Way SITE AREA: 14.0028 acres BUILDING AREA (gross):=253,167 sq.ft. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS: PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth ` 2. Air 3. Water 4. Plants 5. Animals 0 6. Energy&Natural Resources 7. Environmental Health 8. Land &Shoreline Use 9. Housing 10. Aesthetics 11. Light&Glare 0 12. Recreation 13. Historic&Cultural Preservation 14. Transportation , 15. Public Services • ,.:. 16. Utilities ... . _ _.. COMMENTS: I, Po.3I_ct- i s � ►v:. 77 /OO YI 4P F[6o0pi...4i �F114. A4 p p1=5f 4--t/aN w il—T e-i L fi I/E L. a y, 2. SoTF_ f5 :NoT iN4 5a&veIQ MG644-7-0/9/o, 6IT1 r5 iN 17lF_ TA'Laar 1//LL CoLLf.C]7cN 619-s/N, -THE-61f I,S. A 3 6 " 5TOR/i4 e,ir�� .� sly cd /'/ Gr S/ , We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have Identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. /4v c.3t /0) /!'q Signs ure of Dir c or Auth ed Representative date 11 Rev. 6/88 L � PLANNING DIVISION 4.' . D v IO2111 D . CITY OF RENTON r RENTON PLANNING DIVISION SEP 7 1990 CITY OF REIV I 1/ELOPNIENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET EC WE D PUBLIC WORKS;, ., CUSTOMER SERVICES;;,. r:: . ECF-078-90 • APPLICATION NO(S).: CU;SA;V-078-90 PROPONENT: Renton Village Associates PROJECT TITLE: . "' ' `" Village Place North BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:,:, Applicant proposes to construct a new 10-story office/retail building requiring'a Conditional Use Permit since building will exceed 95' in height. The proposal also includes renovation.of,existirig retail center and existing drives, demolition of a portion of the existing retail, renovation of landscaping and lighting A variance will also be needed to construct a new private street. LOCATION: Renton Village Center, S Grady Way TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED.EAC DATE: a ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION' I SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU;,:,,:; , " ` POLICE DEPARTMENT ; COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION CURRENT PLANNING . , l.. LONG'AANGE PLANNING, PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT '�THERS: /.,W-..1.- A+-t� ��e:'.. COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5:00 P.M. ON AUGUST 2, 1990. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: VT!L.17`,V PLAN RrI/(E, APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS - KNOT APPROVED The drainage plans for this proposal shall comply with the core and special requirements contained in Section 1.2 and 1.3 of Chapter 1, the hydrologic analysis methods contained in Chapter 3, the hydraulic analysis and design methods contained in Chapter 4, and the erosion/sedimentation control plan and practices contained in Chapter 5 of the 1990 King County Surface Water Design Manual• . s. , �. �OGVG15 fl/'(' 'f a�/@/'cc��s/' w i'f I 4e?7 Vie/ 0-7rke J(� "Q-</5l/ 2 /eil //1�i '3. 5/fit 1 s iw T /'06` ,,,, f'(d o(/ ?ff,, c o/eWr 4*4 on/ 1b1 4 pi,, , /OO-ypwr cv4?'e4 /eve;P. is Gam'r/, ay, FF / (-Pt! A4,tYffv.VI 02 5/ - N • . ANAI,.Y2t5 4NU Mir/G4-?E' / zfPfCI3 70 1I7`E /00— YAP, Peo00 foG.l'N 171(5 4l r ,, iP wA7en sr-0046F, //OGc,.41F /5 /QF�oPs� h FLoop I° /N) ` Co, ° N 9//70-Nt , MN?. E ,vs7- � p ��o 194"/1V� /� ' g 56 co�n1F �o,o��p a l= s/� �vi�,c. �r��/4a MG/Q� c�T< ma's,. 1 ,0 G IA D a T c c 8 IN p/L-N N/in- L o 75. h� /3fi5//Y5. C , C N r'r=14,4 IJ r/fTe /14,4 N1ti4y5 ,,I N D T6ty TiaN /0//2/=S 5YY41..L OCG2 136 pLA tE►D IN TR4FF1( 4. !/.2 n2 _ Q DATE: ^l/1 -%' ��1`/}S. SIGNAT RF OF CTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE f` -'e D�� to kithvq v� (Qodi�r �r� �'!�s si�`�i11- wr,v be b�eftcr4I ID ccroclvcr' a prec esc rvtiee fyvt �! f REV. 5/90 c,...r...,�:,, P,�„ A.64 i,e�f- In (1ddves'C 0 rold 0A, t p4.4 RENTON PLANNING DIVISION ' 0,711v4Q ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET AreoFR�Mo�°4° REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: \04,fiS y-6--`ct6Y\ 9° DATE CIRCULATED: 7/12/90 : `' ;:;, COMMENTS DUE: 8/2/90 EFC-078-90 h APPLICATION NO(S): CU;SA;V-078-90 PROPONENT: Renton Village Associates PROJECT TITLE: Village Place North BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant proposes to construct a new 10-story office/retail building requiring a Conditional Use Permit since building will exceed•95' In height. The proposal also Includes renovation of existing retail center and existing drives, demolition of a portion"of the existing retail, renovation of landscaping and lighting. A variance will also be needed to construct a new private street. ' LOCATION: Renton Village Center,,S Grady,Way ' , SITE AREA: 14.0028 acres ' :r. BUILDING AREA(gross): 253,167 sq.ft. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS: PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth 2. Air ` , • 3. Water 4. Plants 5. Animals 6. Energy&Natural Resources 7. Environmental Health 8. Land &Shoreline Use •" 9. Housing 10. Aesthetics 11. Light&Glare 12. Recreation 13. Historic&Cultural Preservation ' 14. Transportation 15. Public Services 16. Utilities COMMENTS: 1,`8 s � � �J., ;,� I P ? o-S '1-lr) e- P' Df I & ) 744-L✓-e- p-1"-oj er c Z?,;�( A v e`®u s Ce?d-a-S' : ��✓ ,, �1-1 -e.. ..ra PiS_ T * on, Gam, o , yy , I r fl /sa s e..e. a` I vy e cJ -7/-yj We have reviewed this application With particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas.where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Director or Authorized.Represents ' e,. . Date J Rev. 6/ 88 • Tc-402/1W% JUL 1 2 1990 RENTON PLANNING DIVISION CI I r uF REIv uN DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET PUBLIC WORKS CUSTUMt+i SERVICES • APPLICATION NO(S).: CU;SA;V-078-90 PROPONENT: Renton Village Associates PROJE0-17,TITLE: Village Place North BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:. Applicant proposes to construct a new 10-story office/retail building requiring a Conditional Use Permit since building will exceed 95' in height. The proposal also includes renovation of existing retail center and existing drives,demolition of a portion of the existing retail, renovation of landscaping and lighting. A variance will also be needed to construct a new private street. LOCATION: Renton Village Center, S Grady Way TO: . • PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: rENGINEERING DIVISION • TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION , SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU • POLICE DEPARTMENT .. . COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION. • PLANNING DIVISION CURRENT PLANNING LONG RANGE PLANNING PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: • COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5:00 P.M. ON AUGUST 2, 1990. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: I-oar,$po a 7 1 oc SrSfcy,,s APPROVED • APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED CsR* .) • DATE: .2S de) SIGNATURE 0 DIRECTOR OR A a O/RIZED REPRESENTATIVE -AO\ � G; s.,, REV.5/90 Village Place North Office/Retail Project Renton Village Center August 1, 1990 Subject: Site Review Comments 1. Sidewalks to be provided on Grady Way abutting property frontage. 2. Intersection of S. Grady Way and Lake Avenue S. provide traffic improvement to south leg of intersection as proposed in Traffic Study. Widen South leg to allow two exclusive northbound left-turn lanes and a through right lane. Intersection design to meet City Standards. 3. As indicated in the Traffic Study, a Transportation Management plan to be developed for the new office/retail project. 4. This project, plus the potential for future projects, will have serious consequences for the Transportation system. A Transportation plan is to be developed for the Renton Village area. Also, a proposal is to be prepared from the findings to be incorporated into the Grady Way TBZ, which subsequently may be modified. This plan should be completed prior to issuance of site plan approval. 5. Transportation mitigation fees will be determined and applied after the findings in item 4 above. 6. The intersection of South Grady Way/Benson Rd./at Main Avenue S. to be included in the proposed plan developed in item 4 above. CEM380/CEM/mr Village Place North Office/Retail Project Renton Village Center August 1, 1990 Subject: Site Review Comments 1. Sidewalks to be provided on Grady Way abutting property frontage. 2. Intersection of S. Grady Way and Lake Avenue S. provide traffic improvement to south leg of intersection as proposed in Traffic Study. Widen South leg to allow two exclusive northbound left-turn lanes and a through right lane. Intersection design to meet City Standards. 3. As indicated in the Traffic Study, a Transportation Management plan to be developed for the new office/retail project. 4. This project, plus the potential for future projects, will have serious consequences for the Transportation system. A Transportation plan is to be developed for the Renton Village area. Also, a proposal is to be prepared from the findings to be incorporated into the Grady Way TBZ, which subsequently may be modified. This plan should be completed prior to issuance of site plan approval. 5. Transportation mitigation fees will be determined and applied after the findings in item 4 above. 6. The intersection of South Grady Way/Benson Rd./at Main Avenue S. to be included in the proposed plan developed in item 4 above. CEM380/CEM/mr Opeji pp 0,I 9/0A, IFlENTO,N PLANNING DIVISION 1/8 02 o �;L 1990 DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET fr � b ECF-078-90 APPLICATION NO(S).: CU;SA;V-078-90 PROPONENT: _ , • Renton Village Associates. PROJECT TITLE: ' . Village Place North BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT Applicant proposes to,., construct a new 10-story office/retail building requiring;'e,Conditional Use,:Permit since building will exceed 95' in height. The proposal also includes.renovation`of'existing retail center and existing drives,demolition of a portion of the existing'retail, renovation'of rlandscaping and lighting. A variance will also be needed to construct a new private street. LOCATION: Renton Village Center, S Grady Way TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERG• bATE: • ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG.;.DIVISION. .t SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION:BUREAU'.s: >`; POLICE DEPARTMENT; , COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT'DEPARTMENT • BUILDING DIVISION • • PLANNING DIVISION,, CURRENT-PLANNING • LONG+RANGE'PLANNING. PARKS AND RECREATION:DEPARTMENT. OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5:00 P.M. ON AUGUST 2, 1990. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: TO tcf, • APPROVED y APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED Pive/Wib T AAJAAn t DATE: lJ yam�V SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR' -AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV.5/90 RENTON PLANNING DIVISION ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Pot c r DATE CIRCULATED: 7/12/90 s COMMENTS,DUE;: 8/2/90 EFC-078-90 APPLICATION NO(S): CU;SA;V-078-90 ".:. PROPONENT: Renton Village Associates PROJECT TITLE: Village Place,North: BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant _proposes to construct .a new 10-story office/retail building requiring a Conditional Use Permit since building will exceed 95' in height. The proposal also Includes renovation of existing retail center and existing drives, demolition of a portion of the existing retail, renovation of landscaping and lighting. A variance will also be needed to construct a new'•private street. LOCATION: Renton Village Center,,S Grady,;Way . SITE AREA: 14.0028 acres BUILDING AREA (gross): 253,167 sq.ft. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS: PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION • IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth 2. Air x. s 3. Water 4. Plants 5. Animals 6. Energy&Natural Resources 7. Environmental Health 8. Land &Shoreline Use - 9. Housing 10. Aesthetics 11. Light&Glare 12. Recreation F i 13. Historic&Cultural Preservation 14. Transportation 15. Public Services ✓ 16. Utilities COMMENTS: Oeg+ 341(v-exiikv-e-) � awn m t) PVLI �- a buf- CANI (-() We have reviewed this application wi particu ar attention to those areas inh ch we a e expertise an d have r•en ified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. „A Yv bRgO Signature of Director bt'Authorize ' e resentative p Date Rev. 6/88 • • • RENTON POLICE DEPARTMENT A�� MEMORANDUM 4(4' /9 DATE: August 2, 1990 �d .. • TO: Planning Division FROM: Penny Bryant, Police Department SUBJECT: VILLAGE PLACE NORTH The police department has several recommendation for the Village Place North project. Most of the concerns surround the construction of the parking structure. - Parking garages are.known.for the lack of security they provide and the increase in vulnerability that they cause for the users of such structures. Such facilities are typically dark, making it,difficult to see,floors are on a grade,further obstructing sight.There often is no method of summing aid. Some recommendations for improving the safety at Village Place North are as follows: 1. In the parking structure,the stairwells are located on exterior walls of the buildings. They are shown in tiled towers. The tiling is fine,but the towers should also have glazing material from the ground to the roof. This glazing allows visibility of the occupants from outside the structure. 2. In the parking structure,the stairwells should be equipped with emergency notification systems,call boxes or phones for emergency response. 3. The parking structure should have a minimum eight foot clearance throughout the garage. 4. The structure should have designated walking paths that are illuminated. 5. In the parking structure,the stairwells should be clearly marked and the direction in which to travel to reach them,also clearly identified. 6. The parking structure should have lighting in the stairwells at all times. 7. Any retail businesses located in the office structure should not have reflective glass. Tinted is acceptable. I• 41.6 1 fk - - - 41k- s.. • _ _ ., -* RENTO,N PLANNING DIVISION ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: arc R-evey\ DATE CIRCULATED: 7/12/90 • COMMENTS.DUE: 8/2/90 EFC-078-90 • APPLICATION NO(S): CU;SA;V-078-90 • PROPONENT: Renton Village Associates PROJECT TITLE: Village Place North BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant proposes' to construct a new 10-story office/retail building requiring a , Conditional Use Permit since building will:.:exceed 95' in height. The proposal also, Includes renovation of existing retail center and existing drives, demolition,of a portion of the existing retail, renovation of landscaping and lighting. A variance will also be needed to construct a new private street. LOCATION: Renton Village Center,:S Grady:d ay SITE AREA: 14.0028 acres BUILDING AREA(gross): 253,167 sq.ft. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS: PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth 2. Air :. 3. Water 4. Plants • 5. Animals 6. Energy&Natural Resources 7. Environmental Health 8. Land &Shoreline Use 9. Housing 10. Aesthetics . - ` 11. Light&Glare 12. Recreation • 13. Historic&Cultural Preservation 14. Transportation ` 15. Public Services _ 16. Utilities COMMENTS: ' 1 } ; • We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where,additional information Is needed to properly assess this proposal. iz/ /9'90 Signature of Director or Authorized'Representative - Da Rev.6/88 . ' •• • V ,,•1 • RENTON!PLANNING DIVISION RENTON FIRE DEPT. FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET :JUL. 1 '1. 1990 RECEIVED ,; • • ECF-078-90 APPLICATION No(s).: cu;SA;V-078-90 PROPONENT: • • Renton Village Associates PROJECT TITLE: . „ . Village Place North BRIEF DESCRIPTION OFPFICVECT -i • Applicant proposes to construct a new 10-story office/retail building requiring a Conditional Use'Permit since building will exceed 95' in height The proposal also includes renovation Orexisting retail center and existing drives,demolition of a portion of the existing retail, renovation of landscaping and lighting. A variance will also be needed to construct a new private street. LOCATION: • • Renton Village Center, S Grady Way TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: ENGINEERING DIVISION • TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION: . . SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: z UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION'BUREAtk• POLICE DEPARTMENT, , • ' • COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING IVlSON . •• PLANNING•DIVISIONF PLANNING DIVISION • CITY OF RENTON CURRENT PLANNING , JUL 11,390 CON'G'TIANGE-PLANNING • , • litt;iCil I/6D PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: • COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO7FIE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5:00 P.M. ON AUGUST 2, 1990. • REVIEWING DEPARTMENt/DIVISION: Vire c,z gii Okigy APPROVED , APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED •- ,Any development and/or construction shall, coMply with current Fire and Building Codes and Ordi- nances. Afasr cenit* ;9A0 , 4'e e0AA37—Reeemo 77) 1.1/4A, E ,etluf.egile44 A second means of approved access is required. Fire De artment access17)Manes shall be paved minimum width 20'; minimum height 6". yes Preliminary fire flow calculations shove fire flow of /Soo is required. hydrans with a minimum flow of i/ gpm each is required. • Primary hydrant is required to!be'within feet of the structure. Secondary hydrants are required to bewrthin Sod • feet of the structure. • An approved automatic sprinkler systemis required to protect the total structure. Yes No All fire department access roads are tÔ. be paved and installed prior to construction. Ye .... No All fire hydrants are required tO.:.09, installed and approved prior to construction. Yes_Z. No DATE: /14 /Z//92d SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOAbR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV.5/90 gRA-bri6' 6142,9 6'4-- 0 id V Any development and/or construction shall comply with current Fire and Building Codes and Ordi- nances. A second means of approved access is required. Fireppartment access roads/lanes shall be paved minimum width 20'; minimum height 13' 6". Yes No, Preliminary fire flow calculations show a fire flow of 3, 756 is required. y hydrants with a minimum flow of /, oao gpm each is required. Primary hydrant is required to be within 1Sa feet of the structure. Secondary hydrants are required to be within 3 0o feet of the structure. An approved automatic sprinkler system is required to protect the total structure. Yes `'No_.._ All fire department access roads are to be paved and installed prior to construction. Yes �No N All fire hydrants are required to be installed and approved prior to construction. Yes o /zI /99O 77Y,u,97 iy A,y 0 AI,/ REQUIRED FIRE FLOW CALCULATIONS 1. HAZARD IDENTIFICATION INFORMATION NAME: //jt,,4c,e: %�0e4- A% U.B.C. CLASS OF BUILD ADDRESS: R gv rod Iha#4E C.exv7e.P FIRE MGMT AREA cIhg_ 2 DETERNE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION - CLASS (CIRCLE ONE) : - II IV III V FIRE-RESISTIVE NON-COMBUSTIBLE ORDINARY WOOD FRAME MIXED (NOTE: IF "MIXED," SEE SPECIAL INSTRUCTION FOR AREA AND BASIC FIRE FLOW) 3. DETERMINE AREA: /6 Sia'ey prWC, GROUND FLOOR AREA: FT2 67e/a P/41/ NUMBER OF STORIES 'Y).z/7/ TOTAL BUILDING AREA: 0?31,,.?39 -(A) 4. DETERMINE BASIC FIRE FLOW FROM TABLE #1, USING AREA (A): ,3/J�d GPM (B) 5. DETERMINE OCCUPANCY FACTOR ADJUSTMENT: ADJUSTMENT: - 7Sb GPM (C) IF LOW HAZARD, SUBTRACT UP TO 25% OF (B): IF HIGH HAZARD, ADD UP TO 25% of (B) 6. COMPUTE SUB-TOTAL (B+C): (IF B+C LESS THAN 500 GPM, INSERT 500 GPM) 7)7 5 GPM (D) 7. DETERMINE SPRINKLER ADJUSTMENT: ADJUSTMENT: - ,, ,;:% 5 ;- , GPM (E) (IF COMPLETELY SPRINKLERED, SUBTRACT UP TO 50% OF (D) : IF LIGHT HAZARD OCCUPANCY AND FIRE RESISTIVE OR NON-COMBUSTIBLE CONSTRUCTION, SUBTRACT UP TO 75% OF (D). 8. DETERMINE EXPOSURE ADJUSTMENT: USING THE TABLE AS A GUIDE, ENTER THE SEPARATION AND ADJUSTMENT FOR EACH OF THE "FOUR FACES" OF THE BUILDING IN THE TABLE AT THE RIGHT: SEPARATION MAX. ADJUSTMENT EXPOSURE SEPARATION ACT. ADJ. 0-10 25% MAX NORTH /SO -t- ADD O % 11 - 30 20% MAX EAST /50'-f-- ADD --$- % 31 - 60 15% MAX SOUTH /.SU -f- ADD -e- % 61 - 100 10% MAX WEST `/O' ADD to % 101 - 150 5% MAX TOTAL % OF ADJUSTMENT 150 or 4-Hr WALL 0% MAX (NOT TO EXCEED 75%) /0 % (TOTAL % ADJUSTMENT TIMES (D) ADJUSTMENT: -I- 7.Z!,-- .'GPM(F) 9. DETERMINE ROOF AND SIDING COVERING ADJUSTMENT: o (IF SHINGLE COVERING, ADD 500 GPM) ADJUSTMENT: GPM (G) 10. COMPUTE ESTIMATED FIRE FLOW REQUIRED: (IF D+E+F+G IS LESS THAN 500 GPM, INSERT 500 GPM) /3�" (IF D+E+F+G IS GREATER THAN 12,000 GPM, INSERT 12,000 GPM) (D+E+F+G) REQUIRED FIRE FLOW: /S'00 GPM (H) 11. SIGNED: 1,0444-__ DATE: d l' O v /-72 //n2/*"9 / REQUIRED FIRE FLOW CALCULATIONS 1. HAZARD IDENTIFICATION INFORMATION NAME: V/AA1 4f` P,e4az Al U.B.C. CLASS OF BUILD ADDRESS: �eivredv 'e.(/76? FIRE MGMT AREA 2. DETERMINE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION - CLASS (CIRCLE ONE): IV III V FIRE-R I-ST VE NON-COMBUSTIBLE ORDINARY WOOD FRAME MIXED (NOTE: IF "MIXED," SEE SPECIAL INSTRUCTION FOR AREA AND BASIC FIRE FLOW) 3. DETERMINE AREA: `''�� �'�2 � GROUND FLOOR AREA: FT2 NUMBER OF STORIES TOTAL BUILDING AREA: .4/.5"? Z,57.5® (A) 4. DETERMINE BASIC FIRE FLOW FROM TABLE #1, USING AREA (A) : /„)00,0 GPM (B) 5. DETERMINE OCCUPANCY FACTOR ADJUSTMENT: ADJUSTMENT: GPM (C) IF LOW HAZARD, SUBTRACT UP TO 25% OF (B): IF HIGH HAZARD, ADD UP TO 25% of (B) 6. COMPUTE SUB-TOTAL (B+C) : (IF B+C LESS THAN 500 GPM, INSERT 500 GPM) ,O00 GPM (D) 7. DETERMINE SPRINKLER ADJUSTMENT: ADJUSTMENT: - ,, �-�-� GPM (E) (IF COMPLETELY SPRINKLERED, SUBTRACT UP TO 50% OF (D) : IF LIGHT HAZARD OCCUPANCY AND FIRE RESISTIVE OR NON-COMBUSTIBLE CONSTRUCTION, SUBTRACT UP TO 75% OF (D) . 8. DETERMINE EXPOSURE ADJUSTMENT: USING THE TABLE AS A GUIDE, ENTER THE SEPARATION AND ADJUSTMENT FOR EACH OF THE "FOUR FACES" OF THE BUILDING IN THE TABLE AT THE RIGHT: SEPARATION MAX. ADJUSTMENT EXPOSURE SEPARATION ACT. ADJ. 0-10 25% MAX NORTH / So -f- ADD % 11 - 30 20% MAX EAST 70' ADD /O % 31 - 60 15% MAX SOUTH /,S v/ t ADD 4;3- % 61 - 100 10% MAX WEST /50'-r- ADD -&- % 101 - 150 5% MAX TOTAL % OF ADJUSTMENT 150 or 4-Hr WALL 0% MAX (NOT TO EXCEED 75%) /b % (TOTAL % ADJUSTMENT TIMES (D) ADJUSTMENT: -E- 6,m .`GPM(F) 9. DETERMINE ROOF AND SIDING COVERING ADJUSTMENT: (IF SHINGLE COVERING, ADD 500 GPM) ADJUSTMENT: GPM (G) 10. COMPUTE ESTIMATED FIRE FLOW REQUIRED: (IF D+E+F+G IS LESS THAN 500 GPM, INSERT 500 GPM) (IF D+E+F+G IS GREATER THAN 12,000 GPM, INSERT 12,000 GPM) 3, 600 (D+E+F+G) REQUIRED FIRE FLOW: g, 7 5O GPM (H) 11. SIGNED: ' �� � DATE: Vi,ciej / , `le) CITY OF RENTON • DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM DATE: July 16, 1990 • TO: Commenting Departments FROM: Current Planning SUBJECT: Correction to Comment Due Date Comments were requested last week, on Village Place North, CU;ECF;SA;V-078-90, with an incorrect due date on them. The comments need to be returned to Current Planning no later than JULY 26, 1990. We apologize for this inconvenience, but appreciate your cooperation. .s 4,0 CITY OF RENTON •"LL `yf PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor Lynn Guttmann, Director July 12, 1990 Loren Laskow Renton Village Associates 15 S Grady Way, #509 Renton,WA 98055 SUBJECT:/ Village Place North CU;ECF;SA;V-078-90 Dear Mr. • The Planning Division of the City of Renton has formally accepted the above-referenced application for preliminary review. It is tentatively scheduled for consideration by the Technical Advisory Committee on July 27, 1990. Within • three days of that review, you will be notified that: 1) your application is complete and has been scheduled for environmental review and determination, or 2) that additional information is required to continue processing your application for environmental review. Please contact me, at 235-2550, if you have any questions. Sinee ely, Donal . Erickson Project Manager cc: Renton Village Center 800 Fifth Ave, #3500 Seattle, WA 98104 • Brian Cloepfil The Callison Partnership, Ltd. 1420 Fifth Ave, Suite 2400 Seattle, WA 98101 • accptltr/DKE/kac 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2569 V.• `7 ,y �1 }� . ■ p {. %::;::disv:%$$':;:;%::%ri':%::%+.'•:` :;; :{.'•s::<}:% :j'i::4i::}::{{%}':�y}:$%y:}{y(:;:�:$:%:�{::>.'yt%i::�:%:'ty%5i:<�;:%:�.S:C:2;:::}:t:.�}:�:y%;�;•S:%:%r::�♦x%:•:�:ti!:�:;J:�{?� %}::i$;{:;{{:::�:$}:%fiir:�{::{{:i<:v{?{%kC<%i�i:%ii:(%:%$jii:%:%$Y:�.{i :. �ry•�' is{y:*yr.;:;i %:%:� :•:' �V74:• #:��:%:T/.��4.1#T:i4f71F144 NOTE TO APPLICANT: Since this is a comprehensive application form, only those items related to your specific type of application(s) are to be completed. Please print or type, and attach additional sheets if necessary. • APPLICANT TYPE OF APPLICATION & FEES • 'NAME: Brian Cloepfil The Callison Partnership, Ltd. —*REZONE FROM( TO ) $ SPECIAL PERMIT ' • 'ADDRESS: 1420 Fifth Avenue, Suite 2400 _TEMPORARY PERMIT X CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT S..880 �� X SITE PLAN APPROVAL $1080 CITY: Seattle, WA ZIP: 98101 _SPECIAL PERMIT - GRADE&FILL vvjfir-' (NO.CU.YDS:• ) X *VARIANCE S 300 / /1` tilY TELEPHONE NUMBER: (206) 623-4646 (FROM SECTION: 4-711,D1,6&9. ) • —ROUTINE.VEGETATION MANAGEMENT PERMIT CONTACT PERSON (*JUSTIFICATION REQUIRED) • NAME: Loren Laskow SUBDIVISION: $ Renton Village Associates • _SHORT PLAT ADDRESS: 15 S. Grady Way #509 —TENTATIVE PLAT _PRELIMINARY PLAT FINAL PLAT CITY: Renton, WA ZIP: 98055 —*WAIVER *(JUSTIFICATION REQUIRED) t. • ' • NO.OF LOTS: TELEPHONE NUMBER: 228-3000 • . PLAT NAME: PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: $ • OWNER • • PRELIMINARY NAME: Renton Village Associates FINAL P.U.D.NAME: ADDRESS: 800 Fifth Avenue #3500 _ l eAk f. P y O.Q _BINDING SITE PLAN: $ CITY:. Seattle, WA ZIP: 98104 • MOBILE HOME PARKS: $ TELEPHONE NUMBER: (206) 682-6868 TENTATIVE PRELIMINARY LOCATION FINAL PROPERTY ADDRESS: Renton Village Center PARK NAME: S. Grady Way Renton, WA NO.OF SPACJE�S: EXISTING USE: Retail • Ov ZONING: B1 - Business District X ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW 32.;500, PROPOSED USE: Bl - Retail and Office , : :. TOTAL FEES: $4,760 AREA:609,960 SQ.FT. OF PROPERTY: (14,0028 ettiLti-C. j.?f,G7ki ' acres) Hee PLANNING " - ?:' ' • '- CITY OF RENTON STAFF USE ONLY- -,ARMPNIS'M,ATIVE PE9CESSING :Ca C 7 ;�_} JUL e „-: DATE RECEIVED: APPLICATION-R3FCIIVI`:,D•''&1)ETEItAINED TO BE: 1990 C t DATE ROUTED: _ACCEPTED,•NOTIF-ICATION\3INT: , ' C, c•CaCr ..' _INCOMPLETE,NOVTICATION SENT: BY: Master Application Form Page 2 Legal description of property (if more space is required, please attach a separate sheet). See legal description - attachment #3 • • AFFIDAVIT I Brian Cloepfil; , being duly sworn, declare that I am (please check one) the authorized representative to act for the property owner, the owner of the property involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and thle information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. • I - S CRIBED AN SWORN TO BEFORE ME IS DAY OF 19 • (� NOTARY PUBLIC IN ,AND FOR 1HE ST TE OF WASHINGTO , RE IX 0J, Pt. op QYS (Name of Notary Public) (S' nature of Owner)Agent Lox-G /> ` -&4 The Callison Partnership, Ltd. (Address) (Address). I co A. OJ 6 o i 1420 Fifth Avenue, Suite 2400 II SPatt1 r, 'WA 98101 (City/State/Zip) (City/State/Zip) 2 • r J �� �� (206) 623-4646 (Telephone) (Telephone) .•;_ • Acceptance of this application and required tiling-fee'doe" not=constitute a complete application. Plans and other'material required to constitute a complete_applicatioz;i;are listed in the "Application Procedure." RtnMastr r ; ,. Revised 9/89 " '!„ - , - r PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF RENTON AUG 0 81990 EC VILLAGE PLACE NORM V D Office/Retail Project Renton Village Center Renton, Wa. PROJECT NARRATIVE DESCRIPTION SITE PLAN APPROVAL FOR THE CITY OF RENTON The project is located on the existing Renton Village Shopping Center site. It is comprised of a new office building, new parking garage, renovation of the existing retail center, demolition of a portion of the existing retail, and new retail construction. Also included will be renovation of existing drives, landscaping and lighting. Anew, private street will be constructed to tie South Renton Village Place to Lake Ave. per previous agreement between the owner and the City of Renton. Improvements such as landscaping, lighting and sidewalks will be included along the new drive. The existing Ernst store location and uses impede conformance to the zoning for the last 85 feet of South Renton Village Place. This may require a variance for these existing conditions depending on how this area is improved. The new office building will be ten 'stories (133 feet above ground level; 159 feet above msl) with 260,363 nsf. of office space. At the ground floor, the east, side which faces the existing retail center, will provide 13,630 nsf of new retail space. This will house both relocated tenants and new tenants. There is also a restaurant/food service facility proposed at the southwest corner (this is to be designed, reviewed, and permitted under a future,. separate tenant improvement submittal) . Located at the core of Renton Village, the building is intended to be the i focal point of both the Village and this area of town. While materials and construction are similar to adjacent buildings on other sites, the finishes, colors and composition are intended to give the building a separate and unique identity and character. This design will offer more of an urban, architectural presence and will function as a new contemporary "landmark" for the south Renton area (the old, red plane is gone) . In response to concern regarding views from the hill to the south, the building has been oriented with its narrowest profile toward the hill to still allow,views of the city and hills beyond to the north. In response to its orientation and proximity to Renton Airport, the office building height has already been reviewed, approved and recommended by the FAA. A Conditional Use Permit for Excess Height will be required for the office building from the City (see conditional use discussion attached) . To preserve the cohesiveness of the retail center and to separate the traffic and parking of the.retail from the office, the entrance to the office building is located at the west side between the building and the five level parking structure. Incidental office traffic will enter at the Shattuck driveway for deliveries, drop-offs, and guests only. The primary entrance for the office tenants will be into the structure from Lake Ave. ATTACHMENT #21 Pet 8 Au6r10 VILLAGE PLACE NORTH . Office/Retail Project Renton, Wa. page 2 PROJECT NARRATIVE DESCRIPTION SITE PLAN APPROVAL FOR THE CITY OF RENTON (continued) Exiting from the structure will be to the west onto Lake and to the south onto Renton Village Place South, to further separate retail and office traffic. The parking will be controlled with signage on site designating "retail or office parking only". The "office only" parking will be located at the entrance of the parking structure off of Lake Ave. the "retail .only" parking will be located as noted on the site plan. The parking structure itself will be five stories and constructed of similar materials and finishes to relate it to the office building. To visually decrease its mass, vertical recesses and accent color patterns have been introduced in the composition of the structure. Large, 6" caliper, 25 foot tall trees will be planted adjacent to the structure in addition to the street trees which will surround the structure. The top parking deck will receive planting areas to preserve the visual percentage of planted area. Covered access to the office building is provided via an elevated bridge from the second level of the structure to the second floor of the office building. •µ A landscaped, outdoor seating\lounge and dining area is being developed at the south side of the office building to offer options in outdoor spaces on the site. It will be used by both the food service and the general office tenants and will include paved patio areas, benches, terraced grass areas and separating landscape berms. For more active outdoor options, a 1/4 mile long walking/jogging path is to be provided around the parking structure with a couple of stretch and exercise stations along the way. There will be several existing,trees removed with some relocated where possible. These trees are not indigenous but are trees planted approx. twenty years ago as part of the landscaping for the center. They vary in size, condition and type due to the lack of a consistent planting scheme over the years and the lack of irrigation. Virtually all of these trees are located around the perimeter of the sight and are being removed primarily to allow conformance to City standards such as side walks, the new street, or typical City landscaped setback areas to maintain consistency of plant types and presentation. Many existing trees are being retained where logical, possible and desirable (See tree cutting plan, attachment #30) . VILLAGE PLACE NORTH Office/Retail Project Renton, Wa. Page 3 PROJECT NARRATIVE DESCRIPTION SITE PLAN APPROVAL FOR THE CITY" OF RENION (continued) The existing retail center will receive extensive improvements. The existing covered walkway columns, fascia and roofs will be renovated to compliment the facing retail at the base of the office building. New signage will be provided at the north and west sides of the eastern strip center. The two-story framed building at the strip's center and the one . story retail addition to the south of Pay-N-Save will be demolished. Elsewhere on the site the existing bank building and the abandoned gas station will also be demolished (the fuel tanks have already been removed from the gas station) . The bank and the majority of the existing retail tenants are intended to be relocated in the new retail spaces. The construction will be phased. The existing retail center will remain open during construction of the office building. The retail areas to be demolished will then be relocated to the new retail area at the base of the office building during their demolition. The renovation of the retail center itself will occur last while the center is still open. The central, two-story, framed building which is in marginal condition, now houses some office space and miscellaneous retail shops. ' It will be replaced with new retail shop construction and an "open" pedestrian way to open the retail center for access from the adjacent properties to the east. The existing grocery tenant has plans for this area to develop an outdoor flower/espresso/snack facility with outdoor seating and tables in both the open and covered areas of this pedestrian way (this work would be designed, developed and submitted under separate, future tenant improvement review and permit) . Under the scope of this proposal, paving, planting and some seating will be provided in this area but it will be kept very simple to maximize future flexibility and opportunity with the tenant. All of the remaining center will be touched up and painted for a fresh ,rfinish. Both the new and the renovated retail spaces will be "connected" by means of a unified architectural image. This will be composed of the new colonnade treatment, new street signage, new facade composition and two new tower elements (affectionately termed "strange attractors") which will clearly identify the pedestrian path through the site from the east side to the office building retail. All of these elements will combine to give the center a totally new, original, contemporary image as a major new retail center in the City. Based on a long, positive relationship with the City of Renton and on a strong awareness of the both the functional and visual importance of this site to the City, the owners and designers have labored to sensitively develop this project. It is their intent that this project be a desirable, beneficial, and admirable, longterm asset to both the City and to all those responsible for its conception. brianc 64. r • • VILLAGE PLACE NORTH Office/Parking/Retail Center Complex Renton Village Center Renton, Wa. , DISCUSSION OF APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE FOR EXCESS HEIGHT This project is being submitted for conditional use for excess height as a [condition of a Site Plan Approval. The existing height limitation for this lot is 95 feet (seven stories) for a B1 zone. The proposed height is 132 feet to the top of the highest projection on the roof (ten stories of `office) . This use is permitted under both the B1 zoning and the comprehensive plan which designates this lot as commercial. We have met on two occasions with the Zoning Administrator and once with the Mayor and senior city staff to introduce and review this project with them. The intent of these meetings were to inform the City of the prised project and give them the opportunity to express early concerns and give preliminary feedback as a feasibility study on haw to proceed with the project. The general consensus was that this office and retail use in this particular location conforms with and supports the latest comprehensive planning goals of the City. Informally, the group considered the quality, size, and aesthetic and functional amenities of the project to be positive, and worthy of pursuit by the owner and consideration by the City. For the office portion of the project, the office space demands of the area have been steadily increasing in general and especially for one of the largest employers in the area which has generated much interest in the project from potential tenants. The advantage this project offers to both the tenants and the City is that it is close to downtown Renton and the , airport yet it is not directly in competition nor conflict with residential or other business areas downtown - it is located directly adjacent to major arterials and freeways which contributes to less traffic impact and easier L access. In addition, some major employers in Renton have been considering moving large scale operations to other areas of the Northwest to consolidate their spaces. The generation of this new office space in Renton, particularly at this location with supporting adjacent office buildings, provides options for these employers to consolidate these large areas of office space while remaining in the City. This combination of retaining existing business and providing new business naturally secures employment opportunities and the generation and support of new related businesses, employment and revenues. Similarly, increased business opportunity and space (especially office space) increases potential business for adjacent uses such as the hotel, restaurants and the cinema. • . VILLAGE PACE NORTH Office//Retail Center Project Renton Village Center Renton, Wa. page 2 DISCUSSION OF APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE FOR EXCESS HEIQiT (cont.) The retail portion of this project has two major functions within the community. One is to support these adjacent office uses. The other is as a major residential retail center for this area of the City. The new and existing businesses such as dry cleaners, shoe repair, barber shop, travel agency, video store, bicycle shop, espresso bar, restaurants, florist, bank, etc. provide both this office support and residential support. In addition, the existing grocery and drug/variety are proposed to be upgraded and expanded to provide even better service and opportunities for the residential community. The recognition of this center as an important resource for both the business and residential communities has long been acknowledged by the owners. There is now a rare opportunity to develop the potential of the center to a level that reflects this role. The retail expansion and renovation is a major requisite of the request for building height extension. From a cost feasibility perspective, the three additional floors of office space and resultant revenue play a key role in the financial feasibility of the level of retail center enhancement that is possible. By enlarging and enhancing the retail center with this renovation the desire is to develop a truly vital and permanent mixed-use facility that will establish this area (along with the hotel and cinema) as a major community center with Village Place North as the central, hallmark for both the center and the City. brianc 80 fa I• ?I CnYC10 ON CIl1/.S FlewpN Alf° 0 R 90 VILLAGE PLACE NORTH Renton Village Center South Grady WAY Renton, Wa. LIST OF ATTACHMENTS TO SITE PLAN APPROVAL APPLICATION 1. TITLE REPORT (4.PAGES) 2.1 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST 49 PAGES) - REVISED 8 AUG 90 2.2 TRAFFIC ANALYSIS (22 PAGES) 2.3 PRELIMINARY SOILS REPORT (9 PAGES) 3. ' LEGAL DESCRIPTION (1 PAGE) 4. RECORDED DOCUMENTS (12 SHEETS- 2 SETS) e 5. MAILING LABELS AND POSTAGE (8 PAGES - 2 SETS) 6. VICINITY MAP 7. ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN Al - REVISED 8 AUG 90 8. OFFICE FLOOR PLANS A2 - REVISED 8 AUG 90 9. OFFICE FLOOR PLANS A3 - REVISED 8 AUG 90 10. OFFICE BUILDING ELEVATIONS A4 - REVISED 8 AUG 90 11. PARKING GARAGE PLANS A4.5 - REVISED 8 AUG 90 12. PARKING GARAGE ELEVATIONS A5 - REVISED 8 AUG 90 13. RETAIL STRIP CENTER ELEVATIONS A6 14. ENTRY SIGN, TOWER ELEMENTS, MISC. ELEVATIONS A7 15. EXTERIOR DETAILS A8 16. BUILDING SECTIONS P3 17. EXISTING CONDITIONS SITE PLAN GI 18. AERIAL PHOTO G2 19. COLORED OFFICE BUILDING ELEVATIONS A4 20. SET OF SUPER K'S OF APPLICATION DRAWINGS (20 SHEETS) - REVISED 8 AUG 90 21. PROJECT NARRATIVE/CONDITIONAL USE DISCUSSION /5 PAGES) - REVISED 8 AUG 90 22. FAA 'REVIEW FORM (1 PAGE) 23. GRADING PLAN 24. WATER, SANITARY AND STREET LIGHTING PLAN 25. STORM DRAINAGE PLAN 26. EXISTING SURVEY INFORMATION 27. LANDSCAPING PLAN - SITE - REVISED 8 AUG 90 28. LANDSCAPING DETAILS 29. LANDSCAPING EQUIPMENT CUT SHEETS (7 PAGES) 30. TREE CUTTING PLAN BRIANC 72 20 JUNE 90 8 AUG 90 • PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF RENTON AUG 0 81990 August 8,1990 • Callison Village Place North Architecture Area and Parking Calculations Programming • Planning • Interior Design Graphics 1. AREA OF BUILDING Bldng.Gross Off. Gross Net Office* Core Ret. Gross Eff. . Floor 10 28,171 28,171 25,339 2,832 89.9% Floors 2-9 (8)30,219 (8)30,219 (8)27,387 (8)2,832 90.6% Floor 1 35,360 20,214 15,928 4,286 15,144 78.5% Total 305,283 290,137 260,363 29,774 15,144 89.7% 2. PARKING • A. Office 1302 cars 5 cars 260,363 net sf* = 1000 net sf* (or gross leasable) REQUIRED: PROVIDED: 1302 cars 1302 cars 521 compacts(max.) 359 compacts, B. Retail • • 15,144 new building 11,100 new infill 4,100 Schumsky's 1,804 vacant 15,000 Tradewell 20,000 Pay N Save 27,000 Ernst. 94,168 gross x.9=84,751 net sf* • 466 cars 55 cars • 84,751 net se = 1000 net sf* REQUIRED: PROVIDED: 466 cars 466 cars 140 compacts(max.) 125 compacts • *net sf="Gross Leasable." 1420 Fifth Avenue • Suite 2400 Seattle,Washington 98101 (206)623-4646 FAX:(206)623-4625 • ORDINANCE NO. 1547 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ANNEXING CERTAIN TERRITORY TO THE CITY OF RENTON. WHEREAS, under the provisions of CI.apter 128 of the 1945 Session Laws of the State of Uashington, a petition in writing recluesting that 'certain territory con- tiguous to the city limits of the Ci:Ly of Renton, hereinafter more particularly described, be annexed to the City of Renton, was presented and filed with the City Clerk of the City of Renton on February 14, 1956, which petition was then amended by the petitioners and re-filed and thereupon submitted to the City Engineer to verify the signatures of said petitioners and to determine the assessed valuation of properties of'`the petitioners, and WHEREAS it was duly determined that said peti- tion,, as amended, contained the signatures of the owners of more than seventy-five (75) per cent in'value, to wit, 82.61 per cent, according to the assessed valuation . for general taxation of the territory for which annexation is petitioned herein, which petition sets forth a legal description of the property according to govern- ment legal subdivision or plats, and was accompanied by a plat or drawing outlin- ing the boundaries of the territory petitioned to be annexed; and the Planning Commission of the City of Renton having heretofore considered and recommended the annexing of said, property to the City; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Renton by resolution adopted at its regular meeting on April 3, 1956, fixed Tuesday, hay 1, 1956, at-8 etclock p.m. at the City Council;, Chambers in the City Hall of the City of Renton, Washington, as the time and place for public hearing upon said petition, and a notice of said hear- ing specifying the time and place thereof, inviting all interested persons to appear thereat and voice approval or disapproval of or objections to the proposed annexa- tion, has been duly published as provided by law, and true copies of said notice having been duly' posted in three public places within the territory proposed for annexation more than one week prior to said date of hearing; and UREAS, .pursuant to such resolution and notice a public hearing on said peti- tion has been held by the City Council of the'Cityof Renton at the time and place specified in aforesaid notice, to wit: Nay 1, 1956, at 8 otclock p.m. and objec- tions, written and oral, having been presented to the City Council at such hearing, and the Council having given due regard and consideration to. such objections and all matters in connection therewith and WHEREAS the Council has considered it to the best interests of the City of Renton to delete from such territory petitioned to be annexed certain areas but to otherwise grant and approve said petition and same being considered';proper and advisable; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I: Pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 128 of the 1945 Session Laws of the State of dashi.ngton, it is determined that the above-mentioned petition, as amended, for annexation to the City of Renton of the property and territory herein- below described be and it is hereby approved and granted as corrected and modified by the City Council of the City of Renton; and the following described property, being contiguousuto-the City Limits of the City of Renton, situated in King County, State of Washington, be and the same is hereby annexed to the City of Renton, effec- tive on and after the 25th day of Nay, 1956, and on and after that date said terri- tory shall constitute a part of the City of Renton and shall be subject to all the laws and ordinances then thereafter enforced; said property being described as follows: - - Portions of Sections 18, 19 and 20, Township 23, Range 5 E. f-W.N., and more particularly described as follows: Beginning et a point on the center line of 7th Avenue in Renton, which point measured along the center line of 7th Avenue is 1509 westerly from the center line of Shattuck Street in Renton and is the true point of beginning; thence easterly on center lineof 7th Avenue a distance of 383.429; thence South , 0°55954Se west a distance of 6609; thence easterly along the south line of''8th Avenue in Renton produced west to the section line common to Sections 19 and 20; thence north 0°44926" east a distance of 6609; thence north 7'" S9°5,436°f west to a line 40 feet westerly and parallel to the Tline of Cedar Street in Renton; thence southerly along the said line 40 feet westerly and parallel to the west line of Cedar Street a distance of 614.91 feet; thence north 89°519 east to the west l.ine ,of Renton Street in Renton; thence southerly along the west line of Renton Street a distance of 400.00 feet; thence north 89°519 east a distance of 320.00 feet to the west line•of Grant Street in Renton; thence southerly along the west line of Grant Street a dist4 ; of 155.00 feet; thence north '51_7 east a distance of 670,00 feet; thence north 0'097 west a ?istance of 1139.6 feet; thence north 45°53' west to the section line common to Sections 17.and 20; thence easterly along the said section line common to Sections 17 and 20 to the 1/4 section corner of Sections 17 and 20; thence southerly along the 1/4 section line to the center of Section 20; thence westerly along the 1/4 section line from the center of section 20 to the west right-of-way line of Secondary State Highway Mo. 5-C (Benson Road); thence southerly along the said west right- of-way line of State Secondary Highway No. 5-C (Benson Road) to the section line common to Sections 20 and 29; thence westerly along the said section line common to Sections 20- and*29 to the section corner con non to Sections 200 29, 30 and 19; thence westerly along the section line common to Sections 30 and 19 to the west line of 100th Avenue S.E.; thence northerly along the west line of 100th Avenue S.E, to the south line of Tract 8, Renton Cooperative Coal Company2s Acre Tracts Plat'No.. 2; thence westerly along the south line of Tracts 8, 23, 35 and 62 respectively to the east line of 96th Avenue South; thence Southerly along the east - line of 96th Avenue South to the north line of Tract 72, produced east, Renton Cooperative Coal Company2s Acre Tracts Plat No. 2; thence westerly along the north line of said Tract 72 to the west line of said Tract 72; thence southerly along the west line of said Tract 72 to the section line common to Sections 19 and 30; thence westerly along the said section line common to Sections 19 and 30 to the east line of Primary State Highwway No. 5; thence northerly along the east line of Primary State Highway No. 5 to the north line of South 156th Street; thence eacterl.y along the north line of South 156th Street to the west line of Lot 42, Block 7, C. D. Hillman9s Earlington Garden Addition Division No. 1; thence northerly. along the west lines of Lots 42 to 62 inclusive, Block 7, C. D. Hillman4s Earlington Garden Addition, Division No. 1 continuing north to the north line of South 151st Street; thence northerly along the east line of Lots 14 and 13, Block 7, C. D. Hillman2s Earlington Gardens Addition Division No. I to the north line of said Lot 13; thence easterly along the- south lines of a portion of Lot 10 to 7 inclusive, Block 7, C. D. Hillman's Earlington Gardens Division No. 1 to the east line of said Lot 7; thence northerly along the east line of said Lot 7 to the south line of South 150th Street; thence easterly along the south line of South 150th Street to the west line of 94th Avenue South, produced south; thence northerly along the west line of 94th Avenue South to the south line of South 148th Street; thence westerly along the south line of South 148th Street to the east line of Primary State Highway No. 5; thence northerly along the east right-of-way line of Primary State Highway No 5 to the south line of 6th Avenue in Renton produced west; thence easterly along the south line of said 6th Avenue produced west to a line 150 feet westerly and parallel to the center line of Shattuck Street in Renton; thence Southerly along the said line 150 feet westerly and parallel to the center line of said Shattuck Street to the center line of 7th Avenue in Renton, being the true point of beginning. SECTION II: The above-described annexed property contiguous to Precinct No. 12 of Ward 1 of the City of Renton shall be and constitute a part of Precinct No. 12 of Ward 1 of said City of Renton. SECTION III: This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval and publication as provided by law; and said annexation shall bs effective on and after May 25, 1956. A certified copy of this ordinance shall be filed with the Board of County Commissioners of King County, State of Washington, and as otherwise provided by law. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this 15th day of 11ay, 1956. FLOYD W. SHAFF- Floyd_W, Shaff, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this 15th day of May, 1956. JOE R. BAXTER' Approved as to form:, Joe R. Baxter, Mayor GERARD M. SHELLAN' Gerard M. Shellan, Asst. City Attorney Date of publication: liar 24, 1956. . • r, �. • • 1171.1.1111111117' • • . . • :::. .; •;> :: CITY. • :;: .. . OF .RENTO ` : .` ' • ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Purpose of Checklist: • The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), Chapter 43.21C RC1V, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probably significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. •• . Instructions for Applicants: This environmental checklist ask you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental Impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, • with the most precise information known, of give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or If a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply". Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If yott have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will 'help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional Information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse Impacts. Use of Checklist for Nonprolect Proposals: (Please Type or Print Legibly) Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply". IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL' SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D). ' For nonproject actions (actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs), the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. PLANNING DIVISION A. BACKGROUND • • CflYOFRENTON • i. Name of proposed project, if applicable: AUG 0 0 1990 Village Place North - Office Building Renton Village Center - Retail Center 2. Name of applicant: • : . Renton. Village Associates 800 Fifth Avenue #3500 Seattle, Washington 98104 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Brian Cloepfil The Callison Partnership, Ltd. 4. Date checklist prepared: May 4 e 1990 • 1420 Fifth Avenue #2400 Seattle, WA 98101 • (206) 623-4646 5. Agency requesting checklist: . . City of Renton Community Development Depattment ' '• ! " . • • r, • • • • !. ATTACHMENT MENT #2.1 • REVISED 8/8/90 • a„ • r . 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, If applicable): • Construction Start - December 1990 Occupancy - December 1991 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansions, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. No committed plans at this date. An additional 5-story office building (+90,000 SF) with a 10,000 retail base has been considered at the south end—of- the existing retail center. 8. List any environmental information you know.About that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal, •None Known 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. None Known • • • 10. List any governmental approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. Site plan approval; conditional use permit for excess height; clearing and grading permit; demolition permit; building permits. i I. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later In this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. New ten story office building - 260,363 GLA of office with 13',.630 GUN of retail at base; A fivellevel parking structure; new site parking and landscaping; existing retail facade renovation. (See Attachment #21. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topography map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans . required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. See legal description, site plan and vicinity map attachments to site plan approval. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS Earth a. General description of the site (circle one); flat, xnlling, JIMA xtcnep, s& pms; ma1xtL+lDenarpothxexxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx. b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope?) • One and one half percent (1 1/2%) slope c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, scaly, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. See preliminary soils, study - attachment #2.3. • • d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the Immediate vicinity? If so, describe. See soils study. All existing structures on site and on the adjacent properties have been built on piles., . • • �. i ,e• ; • • -3- • • • e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. Approximately::2,800 cubic yards of non-structural fill from ...oh-site. Both new buildings have structural slabs, grade beams and pilings. • f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe: • ' None anticipated due to flat Site. • g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? 81.6% impervious (18.4% landscaped) h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion,, or other impacts to the earth, if any: Protection of existing catch bas lisJjdrainage systems. 2. AIR a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, ,industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Exhaust' from construction equipment; exhaust from user automobiles; HVAC exhaust at roofs; minimal dust at grading - minimal grading. b. Are there any off-site sources of emission? None • c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: All building exhausting per code requirements; Office user to have 15% ride share program as part of a transportation management plan. 3. WATER a. Surface: ' I) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. yes .-...seasonal drainage swale behind general cihema +500 feet..to southwest of site. , pr,,, 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. None 3) Estimate the amount of fill and .dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and Indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material., None • 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. None• 0 • 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. ,t, Yes . 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. None • • -4- . • • • b. Ground: I) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities If known. Only discharge to ground water; would be.flandscaping irrigation. • 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground , from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size or the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. None ' c. Water Runoff (including storm water): • I) Describe the source of runoff (Including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters, If so, describe. • Storm water to be collected in catch basins and routed south to retention area and through oil/water separator - see attachment #25. 2) Could waste material enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. None anticipated that is related to site use. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water Impacts, if any: • All storm drainage systems coming from parking surfaces to go,through oil/water separators. • •4. Plants • ' "'' a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: X deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other • x evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other X shrubs . , grass crop or grain wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, hdllrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants: water lily, eel grass,.mlifoil, other other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altereE1? Minimal deciduous, evergreen and shrub removal. Majority of site is vacant gravel lot. See landscape plan attach. #26. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. • None known '' ' d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measure to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, If any: New street and parking area trees to match existing. Incorporate maximum possible number of existing evergreen trees. Use 6" caliper, +25' high columnar trees around parking structure. . • 5. Animals • • a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the suet • Birds: hawk, heron, eagle songbirds, ther • Mammals: deer, bear, elk, r;vt er Fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other • • -5- . • • • 1' • , • • • b. List any. threatened or endangered species known to.be on or near the site. None r .. xfrI!' rr • c. Is the site part of a migrdtion route? If so,.explain • • No •• • d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: • New significant tree arid shrub planting with some lawn areas. • 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, wood, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Electric and gas heating and cooling; electricity for lighting. • . b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. Shadows..would be casti:on the lot to the west but it is owned by the same owner and with the existing uses..on'itshe -site;•tno space'.is available. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, If any' Energy efficient HVAC systems; insulation systems per code; High ."U value glazing. +•;: 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur • as a result of this proposal? If.so, describe., , None 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. Fire department; ambulance, police department. • 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: Meet fire and life safety requirements per code. , • • • • b. Noise I) What types of noise exist in the areas which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? Traffic noise on Grady Way • 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Construction noise -during normal .business hours, traffic noise during peak AM and PM hours 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise Impacts, if any: Designate constfuction:. . .hours; TMP for commuters to minimize.traffic- see traffic study, attachment #2.2. 8. Land and Shoreline Mr— a.a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? 131 zoning - site has existing retail and partial vacant area; adjacent uses are office primarily with retail acid hotel. b. Has the site been used for Agriculture? If so, describe. No -6- . c. Describe any structures on the site. • One story retail strip center with two-story office/retail section; gas station; one story stand-alone •bank building; separate covered bank drive-up shelter. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? • Yes. Abandoned gas station building (tanks already removed) ;existing bank building and drive-up shelter; two story wood framed office/retail building; small retail area to south of Pay-N-Save. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? Bl - Business District • f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Commercial g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Not applicable h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. None known:;to..be. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? Office: Approximately 910 people Retail: Approximately 105 people j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? ::•:Appr fice and retail employees k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: Virtually all of the existing tenants to be relocated into new space on site. 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: • Site plan approval process with the City of Renton per zoning ordinance and comprehensive plan. 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. Not applicable b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. Not Applicable c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: Not applicable • • 10. Aesthetics • a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed. 133 feet; painted concrete panel, tinted glazing, colored tile and metal trim. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? Some northerly views of the downtown area from One Renton Place and Evergreen Building would be obstructed. Similar views from limited number of residences on hill to south may be impacted. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: Rooftop equipment on new office/retail building.is enclosed in screens; top level of parking structure have planted areas. Buildings are oriented on site to minimize impact - north/south orientation. 11. Light and Glare -7- • a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? Light from parking (down directed) and building spaces and signage at night with minimal impact - similar to existing • levels. b. Could light or glare front the finished project be a safety hazard or Interfere, with views? Not anticipated .due to glass speck-aonly 13% visible reflectance. c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? only similar, minimal reflectance from adjacent office buildings. • • d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: Again - low glare glass sped h.•L 13%in • ' 12. Recreation • a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate • vicinity? •:,. Informal areas in landscaping around general cinema and evergreen building and between Two arid Three Renton Place. • • b. Would the proposed project displace any 'txisting recreational uses? . If so, describe. A small landscaped seating area at the southwest corner that is minimally used at present. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control Impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: Exterior .seatingicoui:t:iareas:are:.pxovided...neW•.at south side of building and in retail area. A jogging path with az:couple of exercise stations is included around the parking structure. 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally • describe. I , None known • , • b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be oit or next to the site. None known • c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: N.A. • • it • • r•• s.i r • • • • • -8- • • 14. Transportation' • a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed • access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any.To the north,site fronts on S. Grady Way - minimal access directly; to the west and south is Renton Village Place south/lake ave - main access & exit here. Two adjacent private drives will be aligned with new ones on this new street. See attachment #7. b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what Is the approximate • distance to the nearest transit stop? Yes - Metro Park & Ride is located north across S. Grady Way. • c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? Completed project spaces - 1657 spades. 244 existing spaces will be displaced/revised. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private? per previous agreement with the City, a private street extension will be built to connect Renton Village Place S. (public street) to Lake Ave./S. Grady Way intersection. • e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air • transportation? If so, generally describe. It is near and in flight path of Renton Airport. (5,400 ft. ) It has been reviewed and approved by the FAA '(See attachment #22.) f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. Please see Traffic Impact Analysis, Attachment#2.2. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, If any: . Please see Traffic Impact Analysis; attachment #2.2,°mitigating measures". • 15. Public Services a. Would the project result In an Increased need•for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. Only in terms of incremental, additional square footage of occupied space. for fire and police protectioth b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct Impacts on public services, if any. The building will have a sophistigated security system (by tenant) and it will meet all the ,life {safety4kegtii3:ements per the related agencies. 16. Utilities a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other. - b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Electricity - Puget Power - Existing on site. Sanitary - City of Renton - Existing on Site. Telephone - GTE, to be brought in from Grady Way. Gas - Washington Natural Gas - to be brought in from S. Grady Way. Water - City of. Rentonl existing on .site. • • • , , .. , ,: . ,t,�.. . •;• •r• q1. • • o- ` • -9- . C. SIGNATURE • • I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information Is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non-significance that it might Issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. /464.2— Proponent: S(/ • Name Printed: Brian C. Cloepfil, The Callison Partnership, Ltd. • • • • • • al • . ' • 1 �• • e" ., v• , • • • .,'., • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • k CERTIFICATION OF NOTIFICTIOisfpNpJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS/SITE PLAN S. • `-= - • ,± " tFOft OFFICIAL-USE oNLym H PROJECT TITLE: VI t‘asle.„ • • APPLICANT: C \\ -r -1"`a'elYNC-VEz.KLP - c/ APPLICATION NUMBER: EU SIN;c.U.') \-3-0 1 6 The•IiilfaWing is a list of adjacent property owners and their addresses. A notification of110-ie et\ding site 5plan application shall be sent to these individuals as prescribed by Renton City --'2Coda,,`•Cliaptar, 7 Section 38 of Title IV (Building Regulations) of Ordinance No. 1628 relating to site plan.approval. ,(1) ASSESSOR'S <••„. - ••,-,NAME • ADDRESS PARCEL NUMBER • • • ATTACHMENT #5 \ • • ASSESSOR'S (NAME ADDRESS PARCEL NUMBER 51 (Sr "ire nNr0 • • • • • • • • • ,OMV &L CERTIFICATION/LI 1. . hereby certify that the above list(s), of adjacent property owners and their addresses were taken from the records of the King County Assessor as prescribed by law. ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to.before me. a iNelitary Public, In and fw. the State of Washington • re iding, ixat pt`,.Vjz_ , . on thl� (. -rvkday of .3'1&..t ))990 • 4f SIGNED. fl • •,Awl. CERTIFICATION OF MAILING is Sa tiu. k,. ceresier hereby certify hat notices of the public meeting on the subject site plan approval were mailed on /0 is/90 , to each listed adjacent property owner as prescribed by law. ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a Notary Public, in find for the State of Washington residing at f on the /0 — day of ( • /1G • GP.....�A ��.,� SIGNED: . � NOTARY lr`,`:�1 s a puBuo gb:.c0��� ,'''•���WAVI •`, FORM M zpEl ,.. . ' • . •• .. .. . .„... ..,,, . . ,.. .. . . . . i •,•:":. - .•••;...•....":7•••••:•.•• I' ..,.....-....C...-•:.:-.•,'.,'.:•• ••.....,,.:•••••,..„.••••••.• ..,1 .:•-;.'•••:•. ••••,•-•':•••':/,:,•;•••••,•••••,../...;•••••:.,..„,!•:•:i'.1.,•.:•••,•.; .:••.••••:. •• , •: •• : •,_„•. SA•••';:. w.aiig (..;•6••,•••••:‘ -.•••..,.. ,• s . -. . ..,...„• . . : •!•'.".•‘•,:••••••'..:::•;'.,.•'••• :::. : •?....::••• ,Fred H. Knack•,. ::••:•••,, :•••-; ::•:::•,-': •:. •,-,".:: . •• . •.. .. : • . •-,,... State of.Washington . • -• •, . ••...•, , 1: -.•: • •••-',-',.•••.. ••-••', :, :. .:.."-.••,••••263 Rainier Ave S;#204•••-. • Department of.Transportation -: • • . : . :• • -.. .•:'....:i' '': ' •:' •'.,•,•• ••••':-Renton, Washington 98055.: •:•,...::. ... '„' •• ..-.. .. . .. Highway Administration Building .,... ,...,,,..• . . ' . .. ••••••::: ... • .,,•• ••',...:•:.••••••;•-• ....,„.• ........;,..,....,'••••••••• ••••.......„...„:...-,•••:•::y.... '••••••••••••' '••••. , • •• . •... .• Olympia, Washington 98504 -- .. . . ••....'..-:.•• •• . . . .., . , ,') . :•:I:. • '''',"•:.: •.• : :•,...::".':',:::'•• ••••':'•-•,•1. ':'•,•: ••••: .! cit'/023061eto, . .• • ,.":,,.1:. • •.:.Y•:::.i•,:;•••';;•••-••::•••: :::,-" #''; :/1, 2.30 67(5•(:0. •• : ' . '''''.''' ":.:' '''''''' ''':".".: •..1"': 68, 74,-:" '''..• ...1 jd6-140•&81 . . . :: .. • 03-32...6989 ' '•::. If 250516Z.. - ... • •. 'M2p05904972.' ... . .'• ...:.:•••;•.•••••.".'...•.'"•: .,'!•,i,_:::::,•';'.•••:.,".:::.; ;:,..; ':::';;.;l.:..•• .: :''."'./. t. .&o4 71 '.. •• . . , , ..,.......:.::•.:.?..:•.. ••. ., ... . .. . .- -•:-. '.. ...,.::•:.:•.Y?.....r. • ...,'' '1.:•.../_92,,.as fo 87 • • . . ... . „ , " • • • 1 . • .......:::.,:,...:.:..,•• .....:::.... .::,...J.:::,, ....;:,:,. • .-, •,. . .,-','.... ,...-:.:-.. • :;•••--::.::.. •. • . • ..: ,. . :: •:.. . :....,::',„:.:-:.,..•,....• .,...,:: : •• . . . .• . .. . • - . _ i: • ... -•.....-:,..'.:•.•::•:::::. ,::;:.:...;...,:-.:;-,•...1,:;,?..,.:-i-. ...-•,:.,,•:::•,:::.,.... ....,...,..:-..•:,.: . . :.,.• .,-•,,•..2.t....2:-:.,...... • •• .• . . .: : .. ,....:::•,... ..;:: ..•::: ::,:.;.:.... •: - .; :...,:. . • •••••,,: -, -.. . ;..: ;.. .......,,..,:.,,,....,...:,,,,;.,.....-:,..,,;,!,-.‘•.:::,...,,;,,,,,,;:,...,,,,,,;-,..:{,,,..!..,•:.:-...,...,:...::•::,.,..•,::::•;:.,.,.....•.:,..,,....,:!..:;-;.,..; y:• . • .. : .. •.-•: .... ,•,..,.1,::::::•:,.:::,::...,,......,,:.. ..: : -„ . • . , ...: • .1...., ' ' : - ..-:,::::,.: ••••::-. .:,:?.....,..„. . :...James E.Banker •••••:?:•:.'••• ••",:.;'.,.'••!:.: :.,...„..: .• • :, . •.- ....; - Sound • , . ,• .,: :, , . ..., .; .; .....:, ....,... ; • . . . ,,....,•-• ,•. ,•,.....,..-:,,,,,•:•.":•••405 S. Seventh street.:......,,:::..-.„:::::Li.•,•:••,,;:'...-'.'.,":',•;•:••.,..:,:. . •,... -•,: ';'...:', ,,.750 Rainier Ave.:,.S., •.:,. ,...,.:•••• ,,.,..:•:,...;:..'„,:;,:;.: . •, : • ',.,'•.:,:',•:::.r.'"••,,•'.•:::•:. . .....,,,`.,•:::•.•;"..;,2;;;,f,:Renton,:Washington,98055....:`•:•.;•:....!:'''f:;••''"::.''''' „ ..,... •-.•...,...;• ::::;.::••R03ntCn..,,,....,'W.,... hinTcr!....„98...05...,5_....,.....: .,,......., .,‘,.......,.,..,:,,,... , ..... ': :•. ••••:,..:-.,:-. '',....."...•':::',.,.:;',-,:,:,•'.. ..'.„•;:::';'-.•,,,',••;,:'1.::,-.."i.::,::•;":•;:•':-.':',••••:;,:.•';,..!:•.•,•••',..;,*,' •:.-:••:'•'.:L•, ....:.:•:V'•••-•••••'••••• :::, ::. ••••: .:. '••":.:,.. . .• •-::•••';,••:'•,:•••••••:::::::-.)-:,•:•;••..,,-`:.•,- •'.::::::i:;;:',!ffl.',..-:,,,,'•:••••.;:••: ...: ."•;.•• : :•••• •• ...: :': .:: ,, ' •••••'•••••:-..`:••• •,,:;,•'•..-.',,:'''.••••••2'.:.;:•':','.::'''::".• •••'::::::,•••:.':: '•• ••'' ••,':':•;, -..•;• 7i.21.4 .?402.-.... ••••'.;••••-.•• .• .• ••:,:::--,,,e•::/0.309:74i9.A5. • ' ' .•• ... • " • , . '•.•,. :•-••••.••••:,••?,/,3;s::‘;', .: .6 ...;84..-;:-.*:; • :• •-..':::',..,'•'.. ' •.;' ',.'. .' '' .v.1_. ' ... •••:• • .• .. 35,,•••"..'::::;.,•••••••••..•••:.• •• :': : :: •:" •* • .. . • • . . • . , , :::::;•::.',.'•„•••:•••'1 f•:•.•!••:-.•: :.:..,.',-, ., •••• ••••• ' '..• '•••if2;345:5112w•7" . „.... .. •• -• . , • • , "--',„:;:::-:;.;•,:s.:•••., :. . ....;,:.•,..:.,-,..,.. •:-- •:,..:;:.-..-.•• :••-•••::::',•••••:,,••••....,:•„::,,•-i.:•••••:•,,,-, ...:',.."'• •" .: :'•'; •••:: • -••••.••••."-:,,••-..••:.4%:•,.:*:',.... •••••••..--:,• r••• -.. ' • .. ... • • .. • •''• ,.....• -.';-:••:. . ::: •••::- Steve Hagen,.'"'..: f; ••''' .••••:.:-:•• •••••, ••• '. •• .. • , • :,. Castagno Brothers Inc.. ... -.: .•, • . ..„ ,. ••,. - :. • .,••• Seattle City Light '••., :;,•-...':'..:- ' ••• • ::". , •-, . • • . . • ••••••-•• 423 Seventh•Ave:.'• ..., : . • . , • .. ,,, :•. , . ,.. ..:' 'n:' ' ': •:. ••'• • ::' '•''-i':••••,• 1015 Third Ave....--- •1-• ,'. - : •• ,.: •• . • ,• --• Renton, Washington 98055 :I. • : -: i :• .• •:-:-..:::-....-,...• ••• :••• .••• 1:.,', Seattle, Washington 98104t•••,:'..;.,. •••••.•:•...'.••' • • . • -•• •• •. •r••• !'•••-.'`,,'fi.;•••:••., -,.•••• ': ,- •• -0,:p 25.. • •••• . 25 '. .• ••,::•-•••';':••••:••••••;•••• .. • ,''' • .•.6. .? 1,e7itOW..... .. ••••.!.. :::•-•.•:.•••• J:.:••; '••• •• ....'• •• .. .,...!... • : .: „-,•••'..i.'.. .,,:.......'• . - :.'.. • , - * .. :. ....•" • . . . . .. . .. . . .., . . • . . • • . . . .. , . . . • . . ;• . ,:•,••••••::.'.' .••• -., .•••'• •-•:,,,.......- .,.4::.f.:, .'‘ • „ ::• •• „ ••,' „ %.,,,,,...•,•,..„.. :. •. : • - : •.•‘••• •••• '•• •',.•:;:.•;•••,,,.:,.,•,. •!.:..Y•::::::....,', .:::'•• • ••' . •, ...," ..• , .!'••••::',.':.••!:•*•••••• .:•• 's.• : -• ••••'•*.••;•••••:•• ':• ‘:• • ": : ••••.:..•••',,. • -...- ,/': .:. • , • •.• • '•••'. ' Holiday Inn:-.:;,,,,::.4....,'..-.., •....,:.--.. .. , . ,.• .,::.,..,...,,-....i...•'. ..:.'', ••.; Eugene Horbach ••• • • ..i. ..., ..... • • . . . , . „ - . -.-'',:',',..-•• ' ••••••• •-"s•,•'..• P 0 Box- 59V.,••',•;.:". ..-.• ..'.. '..:'''' '' 7. • •;' :.:: ''' • . . 2. ;•• ..... '. . 800 Rainier Ave.:8...:;•::.;':".. : :‘..• • . . . • ..' . • :. .,.. •,,,.:„..,.,,. .. , ,.,•,, ,,....: Bellevue. Washington 98009 •••• .•:•:•.• :•• : ..' • ,• Renton,'Washington 98055. .. ... , ,. ....,...... , . ! ....;:...::.1:::::,:,...F,:,i,,,:.•••-, ".••••••Ji... ,, . . ' .„ . • ,•..,.. .. -. ::„.: ":. ',.:::'...•J•::: • : • •• ' '" • • ' • attn.; Steve Mindemann•i ••• -. '.. ' • . . • • . •• -.• : „„ ... ., . • • ,. .„ • .•• .• .' ::•":.:',.•'... .:' .... ...`'.'•' 7. a.'.'. •'• ... •'.71•92‘305-fe,745'..:. • . . ., .. .. , . . _ •;, ..',...,. •• • ,......,...‘,....',) ..,,,:;',.....s...:.:(....-:,;......,-• ... :•.• •....,-..-•-•-•.,•,.•;;•.,... ....„, . . .......'; •. • ...• ;,.-`,. •.:,..:••••,...',•:. ,.:••..:..'•,. "::•.- -::. • .,... -:.: . . • • .-• , ..":,.., :"';',.::::::::::;-:'.....:•':.'•:-...:..'...:-.'1.':•:,•..,''....'- -;.':"..i'.,....•' •'..,'••:, .•.-. •'...:',• :-•••,,:`•:•:•....::.,..-•':.:!...: . . , .• .. • ..: . . • •••••••••• ,.2.--',...,....-:';',i.. •.....,.......:•.;,',..:.: ••-. • •-. • . • ,. • . .• ::'. :":::;T:r..... - '....'•.'',':':.••Renton Talbot DelaWare:-........!. •-,.r:•'•• .....•• .• • ., '‘ •-. „.•...: -•..- • -- .:.'.---.••.;,,:i ..,' -,•-', '......, ....,.... - .. . . ... ••-. • • •••''.• :'"•:.• • ' ,... • .:::'•-•G S I C'.'Realty Inc.':: ,.... .,1,• , , ....,.. - .• .. .. .". Ed Cook ., , ....,•• .,::..., , . .,... : . . ,,' • ' -.-:•:-'••;:•••• :: : • -.',..•••••1:#700-333 Twin Dolphin'Drive.'.......,-'...'• : .". . ..• • , . 301 S.:prady Way,..•.i-,.,••• -.,...•: .. „ . . . ::', ,'•-•; : ••••:, • •• : : Redwood City,'California 94065 ..,; •:• •••• • • • •• • • Renton, Washington 98055 • • .... ::••••'•-•:•••••••••••••,": ..• •,... •.••,•••••;•::••••,...•: -.... ...,..• ,.- • .... •:::••••••••,....":-..,..•-•••;f: '. •••••!:": . •' • .• -- .00*- '•••• ";,....*:), ,...., • ,• ; ••••• •• j:• ' . • • • ''.: .... . : ...'•.::;••••;:...;,:: :•'..:• .. .-;, . .:.',,.t;-.:'''.:4;••.;•'.....•',.*".•• .• s— ..,:,':..:.:-.; ":!::.::::. '.• : •• '. :.: : . . . /.7.2:••• ...,0, 7:.47.4.:? "-7...... . ' . . • ••.; ,.i:. (.;.•'•: ••••......•••:...• 1...7. ‘•• ..."•••:.'•,,...,.-...;-.. .,-••• •.-., • •.. ,•,.... ••••.;., ::".; •. ' ..- • • • -,. - . • . • • • •• .:..:i •. ,;.2.:,:: •,*•.'.. :- .'...‘.',' ••"-.;,,,.... ......,..,,....,;,.,,,;. •.,:... . .• .. :.: '...•'..,..,....:••:,•_!,,,. ..,...,. ..„,.•,; . , . •. . .. • : ••••:,..-;•,..,..,.: -. •....... ,.... ... -.......,........- ,..:n • . :..... ..-...-.... ..• ...., ', • .. .• • . .... . .. , . ...:.., . ,........i..... • it •.. . . .• • .- • . •• • . ....._,.._ „,,... .: .:,.. • _..„...,..„,-.-.4.7-......-_-.:.-_:li :,.,. , ,i. • .. , . • • : 11_. ' :-...----7----,-,-„6-.2.4,---zAg;_,A---'------,.-,-;-----1,, il,:-, • . • . ,... v •.,.,..;2_,..„$.4.• . i.c ., :., i. • . , . .. . • rii,-,•' .:Pi, 1. .., ,,. • '.. I • f. ,..,, ,1 ---_---_---..• a 5 < ,i, 4, , „ . -0,. -0-7:TiiiEni .... <..111;ASs" 2.042551.1--. --77—.. i,„!,,,..i4•'..i.. , • • • • . '', ". • ...'. • 6.' ;`, '. : '-,..-..,-''' 't` , • ,.. , ' . . -, . ' • . • , • • , • , ,— , . . • - ;.' ATTACHMENT #5 • . • • ,. ... . • • • A TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS for Village Place North Prepared for: Renton Village Associates April 5, 1990 Prepared by: The TRANSPO Group, Inc. 14715 Bel-Red Road,Suite 100 Bellevue,WA 98007 PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF RENTON JUL - 5 1990 HEG VE :AUACHMENT #2_:2- • Transportation and Traffic Engineering', 3 PLANNING • DESIGN • The Transpo [i • .• MAY 2 2 1990 Group May 21, 1990 TG: 89463.03 THE CALLISON PARTNERSHIP Mr.Loren Laskow Renton Village Associates 15 South Grady Way, Suite 509 Renton,WA 98055 SUBJECT` REVISION TO TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS FOR VILLAGE PLACE NORTH , Dear Mr. Laskow: Since the completion of our traffic impact analysis for the Village Place North project on_ - - , April 5, 1990, the architects have refined the project and developed new,more precise floor area figures. The project as currently proposed is significantly smaller than the building assumed in the April 5 analysis. Table 1 summarizes the floor area and trip generation differences between the current and earlier proposals. Table 1. Trip Generation Summary AM PM Use SF In Out Total In Out Total Daily April 5 Study Office 271,125 gsf 412 .61 . 473 72 _ 378 450 2,898 : _ Retail +10,759 glfa 8 3 . . 11 17 _ .18 35 518 - • Totals 420 64 484 89 396 .. 485 3,416 Current Proposal _ Office 283,158 gsf 4.27 .64 491 75 - 392 _.• , .. 467 2,994 - Retail - . -2,440 glfa • -3 -2 -5 -5 . - : s-4 : :-9 `-121 :_ • Totals 424 62 486 - - 70. . 388 • 458 .2,873 Difference .+4 -2 +2 • -19 -8 ` --27 `. 543 As shown in Table 1,the current proposal contains more office space than the previous -.- ' , study assumed. However,more retail space in the existing shopping center is being demolished than previously assumed,resulting in a net reduction of retail floor area. The - cumulative result from these differences is that the current proposal generates fewer daily and PM peak-hour trips. The new daily trip figures should be used when considering the project contribution to area-wide benefit districts. The TRANSPO Group,Inc. 14715 Bel-Red Road,Suite 100 Bellevue,Washington 98007 - FAX:206I747-3688 2061641-3881 • . 7 ` Mr. Loren Laskow May 21, 1990 The Page 2 • Transpo Group Since the PM peak-hour trips are not drastically different, the conclusions of the April 5 study are still valid. Using the higher trip generation figures adds to the conservative approach taken in the study,further ensuring that the project impacts would not be underestimated. • Please attach this letter to the April 5, 1990,traffic impact analysis for Village Place North. I would suggest that no copies of the study be released without this letter attached to them. Very truly yours, The TRANSPO Group, Inc. Erin Allyson Bard, P.E. Transportation Engineer EAB/mlm cc: Brian Cloepfil TABLE OF CONTENTS . Page INTRODUCTION 1 EXISTING CONDITIONS 4 _ Roadway and Intersection Characteristics 4 Traffic Volumes and Level of Service 5 - Traffic Accidents - r 7 FUTURE CONDITIONS WITHOUT PROJECT 9 1991 CONDITIONS WITH PROJECT 12 Trip Generation 12 - Trip Distribution and Assignment 12 . .' Level of Service 12 PROJECT IMPACTS AND MITIGATING MEASURES 17 City of Renton Standards 17 Transportation Management Plan 17 S Grady Way Transportation Benefit District 17 S Grady Way at Lake Avenue S 18 SUMMARY V 19 LIST OF FIGURES 1. Vicinity Map 2 2. Site Plan. . . ; .3 3. Eldsting(1990)PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes 6 4. 1991 Baseline PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes 10 5. Project Trip Distribution 13 6. Project Trip Assignment 14 7. 1991 With Project PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes ' 15 LIST OF TABLES 1. 1990 Level of Service 5 - 2. Traffic Accident Summary V 7 .3. 1991 Level of Service Without Project 11 4. Trip Generation Snmmaty 12 5. 1991 Level of Service With Project 16 INTRODUCTION . . This report documents the traffic impact analysis conducted for the proposed Village Place North project in the city of Renton. Figure 1 shows the project site and its vicinity. The site is located in an unpaved area adjacent to the parking lot for the existing Renton Village Shopping Center. The Village Place North project is a proposed 10-story,mixed-use building with approximately 17,745 gross square feet (gsf) of retail area on the street level and 271,125 gsf of office space. The project is estimated to be constructed and ready for occupancy in 1991. As part of the project, approximately 7,000 gsf of the retail space in the existing shopping center will be demolished. This includes an existing bank, service station, and some of the retail area attached to the existing strip mall. The project site plan is shown on Figure 2. Primary access will be provided from Grady Way via signalized intersections at Lake Avenue S and Shattuck Avenue S. Access to (SR 515)Talbot Road will also be provided from a signalized intersection at S Renton Village Place. Parking will be provided in a combination of surface and structure lots. The project will provide a total of 1,517 new spaces. The TRANSPO Group met with Clint Morgan of the City of Renton to determine the scope of the analysis. The City of Renton guidelines for traffic impact analyses suggest that signalized intersections,where a project will result in a 5 percent increase in peak hour trips, should be evaluated for impact. On that basis,the project impact to PM peak hour operations was analyzed at the following signalized intersections: • Rainier Avenue S (SR 169) at Sunset Boulevard • Rainier Avenue S (SR 169) at S 7th Street • Rainier Avenue S (SR 169) at S Grady Way • S Grady Way at Lake Avenue S • S Grady Way at Lake Avenue S • S Grady Way at Shattuck Avenue S • S Grady Way at Talbot Road S (SR 515) •" Renton Village Place at Talbot Road S (SR 515) • Puget Drive at Talbot Road S (SR 515) • S Grady Way/Benson Road at S Main Street • S 4th Street at S Main Street • S 3rd Street at S Main Street . 89463.01 The TRANSPO Group,Inc. Page 1 n , . I . North i t S2ndSt • Vf S 3rd St 15 PI t Old S4th St Sur Z N 1 co -.c i ii 1 . Y m i= SW71hSt .c 1 �0 iI Q , I SGro'i 1 E si• onv p • • Avg or N 515 Rgure l The VI NGOEPL PLACE V1cinhtyMap Transop Group . 89463.01 • The TRANSPO Group,Inc. Page 2 • . • o OI 1. co . C .. . Z �. .V____ G L...1,_ : . • \ .1 (..r 7-. -- — . -—4 ',.. _ . _______ • • " ,. • cci ., • • :,i*. l I f f ,L.... .. _____ d ., i) , _ , 3 , i t . / ._r_r\ nm ----- •' 1� . . _ CNI i 2 O ,.: •:,r t. , ,: - - -- - � a , Irr..'..�'+, ,1:1..;,5 ;,; is , 1•r : i ry . \ I ';., \ \,. ILL ji • P • • 1 ,.. ,c.,.q11,1!;.v:illri ,...,..;-4,...,:.;:;•.•7,..6.;'..r; 'S .I('t 'r:';J.'ll 1 i ' �IiI }l i St]I it y,t, ...r. Yiiiv t 'S) , t.— ' 1 rC'`.`.� . •.,fit . . :f, iiry r'•"" ` / .. . Lam - V o 5 EXISTING CONDITIONS Roadway and Intersection Characteristics Roadways in the project vicinity have the following characteristics: • Rainier Avenue S (SR 167) is a principal arterial providing access to Seattle to the north and Kent to the south. • S Grady Way/Main Avenue S are principal arterials running generally south- east to northwest. parallel to I-405. • • Talbot Road S(SR 515) is a principal arterial providing access to points south of the project site • Sunset Boulevard is a principal arterial providing east-west circulation between I-5 and downtown Renton. • S 3rd Street operates as a one-way couplet with S 2nd Street. S 3rd Street is classified as a principal arterial and operates eastbound. Together these streets ' provide east-west circulation through the Renton CBD. • S 4th Street is a minor arterial providing access to the southern edge of the Renton CBD. • • Lake Avenue S is a local access street providing access to Renton Village and the Metro South Renton Park and Ride lot. - - • Shattuck Avenue S is a minor arterial providing north-south circulation from the site to the Renton CBD. • S Renton Village Place is a private local access street providing circulation on the Renton Village site. 89463.01 The TRANSPO Group,Inc. Page 4 { -4 Traffic Volumes and Level of Service Existing PM peak hour volumes at the 11 study area intersections were obtained from counts performed in February 1990, except at Rainier Avenue S/S Grady Way,where I-405 construction has changed the normal traffic flow pattern. A July 1988 count pro- vided by the City of Renton was the basis for level of service analysis at that intersection. Figure 3 shows the existing PM peak hour traffic volumes in the project vicinity. The peak hour usually occurs from 4:15 to 5:15 p.m. at the study area intersec- tions. Many locations in Renton near Boeing facilities experience peaks earlier than this due to the Boeing work shift pattern. The mixed employment base in the project vicinity contributes to the later peak hour. In addition, S Grady Way and Rainier Avenue S are often used by drivers as bypasses to the interstate system when the freeways are at capacity, contributing to a later peak in the project vicinity. Level of service (LOS)for the existing conditions was calculated using methodology outlined in the 1985 Highway Capacity Manual The Highway Capacity Manual methods calculate isolated intersection level of service. The majority of the intersections in the project study area are controlled by a central computer which runs the network of traffic signals in the city. Therefore,the results of the level of service analysis may be different at certain intersections due to the effects of progressed timing patterns and the effects of adjacent intersections on each other. However.the method is a valid tool for a comparative based evaluation of project traffic impacts. The results of the analysis are shown in Table 1 below. Table 1. 1990 Level of Service 1990 Intersection LOS Delay Rainier Avenue S at S 3rd Street E 47.1 . Rainier Avenue S at S 7th Street E 42.6 Rainier Avenue S at S Grady Way E 57.6 S Grady Way at Lake Avenue S C 15.5 S Grady Way at Shattuck Avenue S B 14.7 - S Grady Way at Talbot Road S D 39.9 Renton Village Place at Talbot Road S E 42.4 Puget Drive at Talbot Road S B 12.9 S Grady Way/Benson Road at S Main Street F >60 S 4th Street at S Main Street . B 11.4 S 3rd Street at S Main Street C 15.9 I Delay expressed in average seconds per vehicle. 89463.01 The TRANSPO Group,Inc. - Page 5 7 i North t sa,dss R^ H ,1I 1 -40 S3tdSt < , ti 1569.- I" 1459► y 74)0 I 3 1 woe t S 4th St 25 T 520► z N, , 40 h S y i < 1 1 , b �a1 `,. SW 71h St -4 399 f -4447 749 4 832 �'� "9. / 10 /1 N ►_. AIe q, . g oj1�S God--Vf I I �,,ai i j177 K 2 A e161_ T T SRenton Woo,P 530ggR Al(1141110P 1741111116 _ Room �61 V �! 24 - 71%--' I\ 1 i ID . • C-.)9 Rgure 3 TMe VILLAGE PLACE Existing(1990)PM Peak Hour • TranSPO The�C NORTH TraA7c Volumes 89463.01 The TRANSPO Group,Inc. Page 6 • In the PM peak hour, the two signalized access intersections to the Renton Village ' site on S Grady Way operate at LOS C or better. The intersection of Renton Village Place at Talbot Road S operates at LOS E. The intersections on major arterials generally operate at LOS E or LOS F,reflecting their use as major peak hour travel routes through the area. The exceptions are S Grady Way at Talbot Road S which operates at LOS D; S 4th Street at Main Avenue S.which operates at LOS B. and S 3rd Street at Main Avenue S.which operates at LOS C. The latter two inter- sections experience better operating conditions largely due to the one-way operation of area streets,which typically increases capacity. Traffic Accidents Traffic accident data was provided by the City of Renton for the period from January 1986 to September 1989. At signalized intersections which are at LOS E or LOS F. a relatively high frequency of rear end and sideswipe accidents can typically be expected. As congestion increases, drivers tend to become impatient and inattentive,which contributes to accident risk. Sideswipe accidents are also anticipated at locations with double turning lanes which are present at many of the study area intersections. A summary of the accident frequency is shown below in Table 2. Table 2. Traffic Accident Summary 1986 1987 1988 Thru 9/1989 Intersection RE/SS1 Other2 RE/SS Other RE/SS Other RE/SS - Other Rainier Avenue S/S 3rd Street 7 4 14 2 14 4 7 _ , . 6 Rainier Avenue S/S 7th Street 5 4 10 7 11 2 7 5 Rainier Avenue S/S Grady Way 13 5 14 8 27 . 8 13 5 S Grady Way/Lake Avenue S 5 8 2 -5 4 5 V 3 1 S Grady Way/Shattuck Avenue S 2 4 2 6 4 _ 5 . 1 •. 3 - S Grady Way/Talbot Road S 7 9 4 6 8 6 5 ... 5 • Renton Village Place/Talbot Road S - 3 2 1 0 5 4 2 3 Puget Dive/Talbot Road S 7 2 4 2 6 5 2 2 S Grady Way/Benson Road/Main Avenue S 4 2 1 3 4 3 0 0 S 4th Street/Main Avenue S 0 4 1 4 5 5 2 4 S 3rd Street/Main Avenue S 5 7 5 6 4 4 1 -' 4 1 RE/SS=rear end and sideswipe. • 2 0ther=angle,entering and single car accidents. 89463.01 The TRANSPO Group,Inc. Page 7 A consistent pattern of rear end and sideswipe accidents are experienced in the study area. None of the intersections in the project area are experiencing a pattern of acci- dents that would suggest the existence of any unusual safety problems. • • 89463.01 The TRANSPO Group,Inc. Page 8 FUTURE CONDITIONS WITHOUT PROJECT To develop a 1991 forecasted traffic volume scenario,traffic growth rate factors were applied to the existing volumes. Several historical PM peak hour counts at the study area intersections were inspected and revealed a widely diverse rate of growth on the inter- section approaches. On the major streets, annual growth rates ranged from-3 percent on Grady Way to 7 percent on Talbot Road S. On the minor streets,the rates ranged from -5 to 2 percent. These rates reflect a recent period of relatively stable traffic volumes, except on Talbot Road S.which has recently experienced relatively rapid traffic growth. In addition to historical growth rates,the S Grady Way model was evaluated to develop future growth rates. The S Grady Way model was developed to provide a year 2000 'build-out"traffic projection for the area of the city that includes the project study area. This model predicts annual growth rates on the study area streets of 1 to 2 percent. Therefore,based on the historic traffic growth and predicted future growth, a 2 percent per year growth factor was applied to all the traffic volumes. This is a reasonable estimate of traffic volume growth from 1990 to 1991 since many of the study area intersections are currently at or near capacity. Without system-wide Improvements, a limited amount of traffic can be added to the existing street system during peak periods of the day. Generally,when traffic volume demand continues to grow on a fixed street system such as that found in the S Grady Way area, drivers alter their behavior in a way that spreads the peak flow of traffic over a longer time. This phenomenon is often referred to as peak hour spread. The traffic forecasts were not adjusted for peak hour spread;thus,the calculated LOS and delay may be higher than what will actually occur. Applying the 2 percent growth factor to the existing volumes results in the traffic - volumes shown in Figure 4. Level of service calculations were performed for the 1991 baseline volumes and the results are shown in Table 3. 89463.01 The TRANSPO Group,Inc. Page 9 L n , . North S2 dSt h i 1 S 3►d St < , 4i �1�. 1488► y 1435 4 v 7'' --• S31c1P1 i 1 -(.1 t Spy bet S 4th Sty � 546 z . N. . v► < N o H : . • . i 3 ► .. • . I . i 1 1 1 ... ;A.,. .' ,;.,.,c,1 SW 7th St �407 f - 457 7a4► 849► o 9 gro � T i 1,412js ► .F s s,,,�yrr�► 71, li0e 7� 1171 PI" t 12361 R 1% A __�1a1 T _ S e.nton vlaw F .WOOS 1 � • Aigicii4 . . . . . . .. .. . • ' n 25► �D/ . . IF:Fr T '‘ % .. . .. ., 515 i _ .r.., - . it Rgure 4 • - VILLAGE PLACE ' 1991 Baseline PMPedc Hour Transpo NORTH Traffic Volumes . . . . . • . . . . 89463.01 The TRANSPO Group,Inc. - Page 10 - Table 3. 1991 Level of Service Without Project 1990 1991 Without Project Intersection LOS Delayl LOS Delayl Rainier Avenue S at S 3rd Street E 47.1 E 50.1 Rainier Avenue S at S 7th Street E 42.6 E 46.2 Rainier Avenue S at S Grady Way E 57.6 F >60 S Grady Way at Lake Avenue S C 15.5 C 15.5 S Grady Way at Shattuck Ave S B 14.7 B 14.7 S Grady Way at Talbot Road S D 39.9 E 42.7 Renton Village Place at Talbot Road S E 42.4 E 47.2. Puget Drive at Talbot Road S B 12.9 B 112 S Grady Way/Benson Road at Main Avenue S F >60 F >60 S 4th Street at Main Avenue S B 11.4 B 13.0 S 3rd Street at Main Avenue S C 15.9 C 16.5 1 Delay expressed in average seconds per vehicle. • In 1991, S Grady Way at Talbot Road and Rainier Avenue S at S Grady Way are expected to experience a change in level of service—worsening from LOS.D to LOS E and from LOS E to LOS F. respectively. In addition, S 3rd Street at Main Avenue S is expected to worsen from LOS C to LOS D. Since no improvements are planned in the area, a gradual increase in delay and worsening of level of service can be anticipated as volumes increase. As previously discussed,peak hour spread can also be expected to occur in the future. • 89463.01 The TRANSPO Group,Inc. Page 11 k ` 1991 CONDITIONS WITH PROJECT Trip Generation Project generated traffic was estimated using rates published in Trip Generation, Institute of Transportation Engineers(TTE), 4th Edition, 1987, and the resulting daily,AM peak, and PM peak hour trips generated are shown in Table 4. The retail portion of the site trip generation was estimated using shopping center rates. The project retail area will be an extension to the existing shopping center and the trip generation was calculated as an incremental increase. No reductions were taken for shared trips between the office and retail uses or for pass-by or diverted trips for the retail uses. Table 4. Trip Generation Summary AM PM Daily Use In Out Total In Out Total Office 412 61 473 72 378 450 2,898 Retail 8 3 11 17 18 35 518 Totals 420 64 484 89 396 485 3,416 . Trip Distribution and Assignment The City of Renton's S Grady Way computerized traffic model was used to develop the project trip distribution and assignment. The rounded trip distribution percentages are shown on Figure 5 and the assignment is shown on Figure 6. The project trips were added to the 1991 baseline volumes to develop a 1991 with project PM peak hour traffic volume • estimate, as shown on Figure 7. Level of Service PM peak hour level of service was calculated at the area intersections using the 1991 with project volumes and the results are shown below in Table 5. 89463.01 The TRANSPO Group,Inc. Page 12 • r f _ \ ,......,, :t .::::.:1. I :;`Co =113z • y•• • . .: . 4 E s \. I � 5 e}ny+BaM giY N I9I • • 4 I „ �\4j• �` 'isI � a\ ' : SAnVfl0y li • 14 co >:}., y 4 ............ v —-- .......,.a,,� pts y 4 (1J »i;::>:;,n:::::'•:d::.::r..:rr.;>...;. s .>:'^nr., 4. �1( ,.r;C:, i:v�. • i,jt;:;. "'"li£;f: ::i':�i,ir..,57x,•rv].:��'fi-:f.•:: ', \ I. ...‘ 'i :r.., I! 'S<itiF s}::%:�:i}{}?} Aw. OS ':tiiti;3:�':,':':' .•.•44,:,Z.>.i..,• W.I:r9 0''u t ; \. €';{?.'".�i'"3.`n' e`;+,\ Lo • • ,"u`,`fii:o{i 111'q, `'o:[-s;;a`o:� :\��•\•��C:}Ca::o'A\ p� ;;"Rsr:'@$:?`�C't�'"i`�`'+"F.�a°}Y::++.'rri >r:i ,(,,rir ,u,. ,:\';C.�ca�;:;'Se`C:cSV�,.'o:'<'e3w.�aSn;r,�"c�a`,2:.iia;,r,;vh.' i•.# r,• :,. • • t VA. A3111/A • ?h, . CI.. , r4 W � rr� V g • Ir.0 , 5 ‘• - F , . . , . North ______,, fig% . $Z!K/St 9 14 Jr - 1 S 3td St - Q 78 522 Al 34 Pi _ y 14 1/ et frkid 1 S4thS V 14 135 slo 1i6 co CI3m 1; - i , .. 14 -SW 7th St /✓ 9 it 18 � • 7924S 1�61 138 1p 5/- f.--87 + 11 \` --- �--1t S Renton Vlbpo PI 11 • 15 6 / . as. 35 Rya Dr. -NIKVir • L 11 - t 3 u's _ - - , i515 > `. • 416 / 0 o - Flgure 6 TM^ VILLAGE PLACE moo, Trip Assignment RTH Tmnspo _ _ ..: . , -_. , . . .. .. ._ -•. ... .. . . . 89463.01 The TRANSPO Group,Inc. Page 14 n y North l S2ndSt ✓ -�3 i,„ S3idSt <_ 1606� 1 1488� y°Pl 1 i 1 SI: S ®t S 4m Sr 25 T sat54a► z ��N. . �p Al cii h Y s < t ^ I3 ► -4 -4� '� sw7th s< 764 , ssq� a ,6I 9 Il F. � ic a3 � r 1�i1219 ' ►1 I 12 ' 1Z " aim o. A„ 7a h 1241r. 1% • ss S Roam V a P1 627111075 y - a 0 1 t .. Puvera ..62 r ..41, 25► � D4 Mg 1 1 1 515 figure 7 The VILLAGE PLACE 1991 With Project PM Pic Hour T �� O NORTH Traffic Volumes ,. Group 89463.01 The TRANSPO Group,Inc. - Page 15 . L i Table 5. 1991 Level of Service With Project 1990 1992 Without Project 1992 With Project Intersection LOS Delay1 LOS Delayl LOS Delayl Rainier Avenue S at S 3rd Street E 47.1 E 50.1 E 52.6 Rainier Avenue S at S 7th Street E 42.6 E 46.2 E 46.2 Rainier Avenue S at S Grady Way E 57.6 F >60 F >60 S Grady Way at Lake Avenue S C 15.5 C 15.5 C 21.1 S Grady Way at Shattuck Avenue S B 14.7 B 14.7 C 16.2 S Grady Way at Talbot Road S D 39.9 E 42.7 E 52.6 Renton Ydtage Place at Talbot Road S E 42.4 E 472 E 57.9 Puget Drive at Talbot Road S B 12.9 B 11.2 B 11.5 S Grady Way/Benson Road at Main Ave S F >60 F >60 F >60 S 4th Street at Main Avenue S B - 11.4 B 13.0 B 12.9 • S 3rd Street at Main Avenue S C 15.9 C 16.5 C 17.5 1 Delay expressed in average seconds per vehicle. As shown in Table 5.no change in level of service(except at S Grady Way/ Shattuck Avenue S.which worsens from LOS B to LOS C) is expected. 89463.01 The TRANSPO Group,Inc. Page 16 r . PROJECT IMPACTS AND MITIGATING MEASURES City of Renton Standards The City of Renton policy for traffic mitigation is set forth in a memo that is dis- tributed by the traffic division. For intersections,the policy states: "The developer is expected to maintain with their development the same level of ser- vice that would be anticipated in the horizon year if the site were not developed. (Unless the horizon year level of service is at C or above.)" The Village Place North project does not meet the city's threshold requirements for intersection mitigation: however, the project proponent will be providing three significant mitigating measures to reduce the effects of project generated traffic on the street system. The first is a transportation management plan(TMP),the second is a contribution to area- wide improvements in the S Grady Way transportation benefit district(TBD). and the third includes improvements to the S Grady Way/Lake Avenue S intersection. Transportation Management Plan The nature of traffic generated by office projects lends them to successful transportation management plans CTMPs). Currently, three office buildings on the Renton Village campus are occupied by Boeing, One Renton Place,Two Renton Place, and Three Renton Place. Successful TMPs are operated at these offices which consistently result in a 15 percent.rideshare.. Since Boeing will occupy the Village Place North building, it is suggested that a similar TMP be developed for the office portion of the project. ._ S Grady Way Transportation Benefit District . The City of Renton has implemented a plan to collect pro-rata contributions from new developments to fund areawide improvements in the S Grady Way TBD. The contribu- tions are based on the type of development and the number of daily trips it is estimated 89463.01 The TRANSPO Group,Inc. Page 17 • that the project will generate. Of the projected 3.416 average weekday daily traffic(AWDT) generated by the Village Place North project. 2,898 AWDT are generated by the office por- tion of the project,with the remaining 518 AWDT being generated by the retail portion. It is suggested that the Village Place North project contribute to the S Grady Way TBD based on the project AWDT generated by use. . S Grady Way at Lake Avenue S • The addition of project traffic at the S Grady Way/Lake Avenue S intersection is expected to change the 1991 level of service from B to C. The added northbound left turns • due to the project may create long queues on the Renton Village campus and it is suggested that the south leg be widened to allow two exclusive northbound left-turn lanes and a • through-right lane. This will require that the traffic signal be modified to accommodate the widening. This improvement is not required to mitigate a level of service deficiency.but will • improve on-site circulation for the project. • • • • • • • 89463.01 The TRANSPO Group,Inc. Page 18 SUMMARY The Village Place North mixed use project will comprise approximately 17,745 gsf of retail area and 271,125 gsf of office space in a ten story building. As part of the project, 7,000 gsf of existing commercial space at the Renton Village Shopping Center will be • demolished. The project is expected to generate 484 AM peak hour trips,485 PM peak hour trips and 3,416 average weekday trips. Per the city's guidelines,no intersection-specific mitigation is required. However, the project will be preparing a TMP with the City of Renton. Tentative TMP goals are 15 - percent rideshare. In addition, the project will contribute to the S Grady Way TBD, and - -improve the intersection of S Grady Way/Lake Avenue S. • • • • • • 89463.01 The TRANSPO Group,Inc. Page 19 .. I . I 4 11 \ • PRELIMINARY DESIGN REPORT GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING SERVICES PROPOSED FOUR RENTON PLACE PFNT(1N. WASHINGTON FOR • t RENTON VILLAGE COMPANY 4 ///P ,/!,0r/ rie./C AMa4" AN.- 4N C ��-7- 4.ree,frogr4DGvcoy /.��cT..— 5. I 1 • f . • 1 . 7 - • 1 PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF RENTON . • • JUL - 5 1990 [ - RECEIVE* ATTACHMENT #2.3 I- _ .- GeoEngineers -:: • Incorporated - • Renton Village Company ' September 9, 1986 Page 3 We appreciate the opportunity to be of service to you on this project. Should you have any questions, please call. Yours very truly, GeoEngineers, Inc. Bek ��,v�,� G eg ihoho'ate �Of Nsy�y `�o� Nancy L. Tochko co « cf 0 Staff Engineer y o�Fs FQS RED �`'� James B. Thompson 404/AI 01C, Associate 44, ' • 44ck K. Tuttle P'rincipal NLT:JBT:el Three copies submitted GeoEngineers Incorporated I, :71,k..„A•vio IGeoEngineers Incorporated i2061 746-5200 Consultinc Geotechrirai 2405-140th Ave.N.E Engineers and Geologists Bellevue,WA 98005 September 9, 1986 • Renton Village Company Evergreen Building Renton, Washington 98055 Attention: Mr. Everett Johnson Gentlemen: - Preliminary Design Report Geotechnical Engineering Services Proposed Four Renton Place I Renton, Washington File No. 344-11 This report presents preliminary geotechnical design information for the proposed Four Renton Place office building in Renton, Washington. The Ilocation of the proposed building, with respect to existing site features , is shown in Figure 1. ISUBSURFACE CONDITIONS • Subsurface conditions in the proposed building area have been explored I _ by drilling one test boring to a depth of 65 feet at the' location shown in Figure 1 . The boring log, along with descriptions of the soil classi- fication system and the boring log symbols used, are presented in Figures 2 through 5.. . At the exploration location, a layer of fill blankets compressible ' native deposits overlying bedrock. Fill consisting of medium dense silty sand with fine gravel was encountered to a depth of 8 feet. The fill is Iunderlain by sequences of very soft to medium stiff peat, organic silt, and silt , and very loose to loose sand and silty sand. These compressible ' deposits were encountered between a depth of 8 to 34 feet. Units of medium dense to very dense gravelly sand, sandy gravel, sand and silty sand are • I , Renton Village Company September 9, 1986 I Page 2 present from a depth of 34 feet to bedrock which was encountered at a depth Iof 60 feet. Sandstone bedrock with thin seams of siltstone was encountered from 60 feet to the maximum depth explored (65 feet). o- A piezometer was installed in the boring; the ground water level in this piezometer was measured at a depth of 7-1/2 feet at the time of drilling. FOUNDATION SUPPORT OPTIONS We expect 'that the new building will have similar loads to the Two IRenton Place and Three Renton Place office buildings. We recommend that the new building be supported on piles. Based on the results of the initial exploration, we believe that the two most feasible pile schemes are to: 1. support the structure on end-bearing piles founded on bedrock, or 2. support the structure on friction piles driven into the competent sand and gravel units, overlying bedrock. Prior to selecting the type of pile to be used for support of the ' building, we recommend that four additional borings be drilled (one at each building corner). The capacities of piles driven to bedrock will be similar ! to those used for the office buildings now under construction. Pile capacity- penetration relationships for friction piles can be developed when the ' additional borings are completed and the extent and thickness of the competent granular soils is better defined. IFLOOR SLAB SUPPORT We anticipate that the lower floor slab for the new building can be supported on-grade only if minor amounts of fill are placed in the building area. If the existing grade is to be raised substantially by placement of new fill, the lower floor slab would probably have to be pile supported. OTHER CONSIDERATIONS Our conclusions and recommendations for Two Renton Place and Three j Renton Place are presented in reports dated May 9, 1985 and February 19, -.� 1986, respectively. The conclusions and recommendations in these previous reports concerning site preparation, fill placement, pavements and entries may be used in the preliminary design of Four Renton Place. • GeoEngineers Incorporated W aY I South Grady I ISeattle Trust Bank I I _cip8 4-1 I I ..;‘ I PROPOSED I I I• \ FOUR RENTON PLACE I I f KEY: . B4- /1\ - . I BORING LOCATION AND NUMBER N 0 50 100 IREFERENCE : I I I PRELIMINARY. SITE PLAN PROVIDED BY SCALE IN FEET IRENTON VILLAGE COMPANY. �0 GeoEt19Ineers SITE PLAN �® Incorporated FIGURE 1 SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM MAJOR DIVISIONS GROUP GROUP NAME SYMBOL GRAVEL CLEAN GRAVEL GW WELL-GRADED GRAVEL,FINE TO COARSE COARSE GRAVEL GRAINED GP POORLY-GRADED GRAVEL SOILS MORE THAN 60% GRAVEL GM SILTY GRAVEL OF COARSE FRACTION WITH FINES RETAINED ON NO. 4 SIEVE GC CLAYEY GRAVEL MORE THAN 60% RETAINED ON SAND CLEAN SAND $W WELL-GRADED SAND, FINE TO NO. 200 SIEVE COARSE SAND SP POORLY-GRADED SAND MORE THAN 60% SAND SM SILTY SAND OF COARSE FRACTION WITH FINES PASSES NO. 4 SIEVE SC CLAYEY SAND SILT AND CLAY ML SILT FINE INORGANIC GRAINED CL CLAY SOILS LIQUID LIMIT LESS THAN 60 ORGANIC OL ORGANIC SILT, ORGANIC CLAY SILT AND CLAY MH SILT OF HIGH PLASTICITY, ELASTIC SILT MORE THAN 60% INORGANIC PASSES NO. 200 CH CLAY OF HIGH PLASTICITY. FAT CLAY SIEVE • LIQUID LIMIT 60 OR MORE ORGANIC OH ORGANIC CLAY, ORGANIC SILT HIGHLY ORGANIC SOILS PT PEAT NOTES: SOIL MOISTURE MODIFIERS: 1. Field classification Is based on Dry - Absence of moisture, dusty, dry visual examination of soil In general to the touch accordance with ASTM D2488-83. Moist - Damp, but no visible water 2. Soil classification using laboratory tests is based on ASTM D2487-83. Wet - Visible free water or saturated, usually soil is obtained from 3. Descriptions of soil density or below water table consistency are based on Interpretation of blowcount data, visual appearance of soils, and/or test data. I0 c to co w C7 -��1�' SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM • GeoEngineers NOW Incorporated • FIGURE 2 y � LABORATORY TESTS: SOIL GRAPH: AL Atterberg limits SM Soil Group Symbol CP Compaction (See Note 1) CS Consolidation I DS Direct shear Distinct contact between GS Grain—size analysis Soil Strata HA Hydrometer analysis I K Permeability Gradual Change between Soil Strata M Moisture content MD Moisture and density I Sp Swelling pressure - Water Level TX Triaxial compression UC Unconfined compression - z Bottom of Boring • -,�- I BLOW—COUNT/SAMPLE DATA: IBlows required to drive sampler < 22 • Location of relatively 12 inches or other indicated undisturbed sample I distances using3 0 0 pound hammer falling 3 0 inches. 12 ® Location of disturbed sample 'P' indicates sampler pushed with P Location of sampling attempt weight of hammer or hydraulics with no recovery of drill rig. 10 0 Location of sample attempt using Standard Penetration Test procedures NOTES: 1. Soil classification system is summarized in Figure 2 - - • 2. The reader must refer to the discussion in the report text -- as well as the exploration logs for a proper understanding . . - of subsurface conditions. in m 1 m CO _ w - - S. O �// KEY TO BORING LOG SYMBOLS ��gO GeoEnglneers �0 Incorporated . FIGURE 3 . - --. ` BORING NO. B4 TEST DATA',_ ' _. L.•• 2 I co c EL a m c c m o o Group • DESCRIPTION • _IIco I_ 2 cj co coo co Symbol 0 I _ SM GRAY SILTY FINE SAND WITH FINE GRAVEL (MEDIUM - DENSE, MOIST) (FILL) - MD 10'. 123 13 ■ I 6— — E 4 ■ _ _ ML GRAY SILT WITH TRACES OF CLAY, FINE SAND AND I ORGANIC MATTER (MEDIUM STIFF, WET) - 10-- • I PT BROWN PEAT WITH LAYERS OF SILT (SOFT, WET)• -- MD 61i - 63 3 •■ I16-- -- • - SP- GRAY FINE SAND WITH SALT AND LE':SES OF SILTY - - W. - 4 ■ SM FINE SAND (LOOSE, WET) _ W W - x20— II- --------"' — . - ML INTERBEDDED GRAY AND BROWN' SIL- .�IITH FINE SAND ii OL AND ORGANIC SILT (VERY SOFT , eiET) p - _ - MD • 77w 54 2 ■ - 18,, _2 6— - SM GRAY SILTY FINE SAND AND BRJW'.' SI • WITH FINE ML SAND AND ORGANIC MATTER (VERY LOOSE AND VERY - 3 ■ SOFT, WET) - I • 30— ML MOTTLED GRAYISH-BROWN SILT WIT-, FINE=SAND, ._.: - - TRACES -OF -WOOD. FRAGMENTS AND ORGANIC MATTER-' a: _ (SOFT TO _MEDIUM STIFF, WET) _. _'- _ - _ MD 50 10 4 ■ - I `L 5 GRAY GRAVELLY FINE TO COARSE SAND TO SANDY FINE.36— • GW TO COARSE GRAVEL WITH A TRACE OF SILT (DENSE, _ - WET) - IMD 8 1 3 7 44 ■ _ _ W I 4 0— z Note: See Figure 3 for Explanation of Symbols . Y Y I —/ aw -LOG OF BORING \�•/ GeoEnglneers Incorporated -4 . - • TEST DATA BORING NO. B4- CONTINUED) ' I 7c as a m r2 3 E DESCRIPTION 0 0 �., o o m Group Wit- MU co mu as Symbol 40 _ __ 27 •® SP GRAY FINE SAND WITH SILT (MEDIUM DENSE TO - SM DENSE, WET) 45— _ INTERBEDDED WITH FINE TO MEDIUM SAND WITH A - _ MD 18 120 36 • TRACE OF SILT 50— — - _ MD. 21$ 103 106 • - SM GRAY SILTY FINE SAND WITH GRAVEL AND SANDSTONE I FRAGMENTS (DENSE TO VERY DENSE, MOIST TO WET) 55— F- MD 19, 108 18 U BLOW COUNT NOT REPRESENTATIVE OF MATERIAL W - - w _ ENCOUNTERED —■60 SS GRAY SANDSTONE (VERY DENSE, MOIST) I- - a w O - _ 1 MD 14 116 100 _ 3" 00 85-- ■ Q' • BORING COMPLETED AT 65 FEET ON 9 '2/86 I PIEZOMETER INSTALLED TO 65 FEET _- • w __ WATER LEVEL IN PIEZOMETER MEASURED AT I Z- 7-1/2 FEET ON 9/2/86 - z - Y u• - Y 1I S _ M I INote: See Figure 3 for Explanation of Symbols GeoEnglneers LOG OF BORING tap Incorporated FIGURE 5 I- UGV U'Y' JU 11•'TJ GUU GJJ 6JUU 1 //./3 0®‘ • LEGAL DESCRIPTION; That portion of Block 12, C.D. Hillman's Earlington Garden Addition Division Ho. leas recorded in Volume 17 of Plats, Page 74, Records of King County, Washington, together with portions of vacated 96th Avenue South, vacated 9th Avenue South and the vacated alley between 9th Avenue South and 9th Place South, all vacated under Ordinance 2051 of the City of Renton and that portion of the northeast quarter of Section 19, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, N.M. in King County, Washington, more particularly described at follows • Commencing at the northeast coiner of the southwest quarter of said northeast quarter; thence S 0104'08" W along the east line of said southwest quarter, a distance of 250.02 feet; thence N 89Q44'02" W. a distance of 18.28 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; thence con- tinuing N 89 44'02" W. a distance of 111.05 feet to a tangent curve to the right having a radius of 245 feet1 thence northwesterly along • said curve through a central angle of 48 O1'02", an arc distance of 205. 32 feet; thence N 41°43'00" W, a distance of 201.41 feet to a tangent curve to the right having a radius of 245 feet; thence northerly along said curve through a central angle of 41°11'18", an arc distance of 176.12 feet; thence N 01635' 52" W, a distance of 13. 79 feet to a point on the loutl line of land described in lease to Standaro Oil Company of California dated January 21, 1964; thence N 89°28'13" E, along said south line, a distant; of 10.09 feet to the southeast corner of said land; thence N 00 31'47" W along the yeast line of said land; a distance of. 211. 12 feet to the southerly margin of Grady Way (also known as Secondary State Highway No. 1-L) being 100 feet in width as presentl6 established; thence northeasterly along said south margin, N 77 28' 26" E, a distance of 203.55 feet to a tangent curve to the left having a radius of 3862. 71 feet; thence along said curve through a central angle of 11 14'O8", an arc distance of 758.84 feet to a point on the west line of land described in Exhibit "A" of Quit Claim Deed under King County Recording No. ,8208270-355; -thence leaving said south margin of Grady Way, S 01o04'•08" W -along said west line, a distance of 840.76 feet to the north margin of Renton Village Place as conveyed to the City of Renton under King County Recording No. 5475310; thence N 89 44'02" W, a distance of 372.42 feet along the north margin of said Renton Village ?lap Co the east margin of vacated said 96th Avenue South; . thence S 01 04'08" W along said east margin. a distance of 60.01 feet to the southwest corner of said Renton Village Place; thence PLANNING C VISION N 89°44'02" W. a distance of 48:28 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. CITY OF RE\ITON JUL - 5 1990 ATTACHMENT' #3 STEWART TITLE COMPANY OF WASHINGTON, INC. ;. n rp 1201 'Third Avenue, Suite 3800 ) IL ; y; ;;; Seattle, Washington 98101 ; a — 1.12 1 {i Senior Title Officer, Marilyn Sanden = , 0 i1.J Title Officer, Bob Curtis • ~� � . Title Officer, Allan Knight Unit No. 2 L ,; it :N !D; ETvrp^uiP FAX No. (206)343-8400 343-1345 Renton Village Associates Title Order No. 121025 15 South Grady Way CERTIFICATE FOR Renton, Washington 98055 FILING PROPOSED PLAT Attention: Loren SHORT PLAT CERTIFICATE SCHEDULE A GENTLEMEN: In the matter of the plat submitted for your approval, this Company has examined the records of the County Auditor and County Clerk of King County, Washington, and the records of the Clerk of the United States Courts holding terms in said County, and from such examination hereby certifies that the title to the following described land: As on Schedule A, pages 2 and 3, attached. IS VESTED IN: RENTON VILLAGE ASSOCIATES, a Washington general partnership, • consisting of MICHAEL SANDORFFY and HENRIKA SANDORFFY, husband and wife, MORRIS D. MUSCATEL and CYNTHIA MUSCATEL, husband and wife, and MICHAEL GOLDFARB, as his separate estate SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING EXCEPTIONS: As on Schedule B, attached hereto. CHARGE: $200.00 TAX: 16.20 TOTAL CHARGE: $216.20 RECORDS EXAMINED TO: June 7, 1990 at 8:00 a.m. $ EW ART-TAT, E -COMPANY , WASHINGTON, Ape y OF RENTONVISION • Marilyn Sanden • JUL - 5 1990 Senior Title Officer Unit No. 2 HECEgvED ATTACHMENT # 1 Order No. 121025 SHORT PLAT CERTIFICATE SCHEDULE A Page : 2 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: That portion of Block 12, C.D. Hillman' s Earlington Garden Addition Division No. 1, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 17 of Plats, page 74, in King County, Washington; TOGETHER WITH portions of vacated 96th Avenue South, vacated 9th Avenue South and the vacated alley between 9th Avenue South and 9th Place South, all vacated under Ordinance 2051 of the City of Renton and that portion of the northeast quarter of Section 19, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M. , in King County, Washington, more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the northeast corner of the southwest quarter of said northeast quarter; thence south O1°04' 08" west along the east line of said southwest quarter, a distance of 250.02 feet; thence north 89°44'02" west, a distance of 18.28. feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; thence continuing north 89°44' 02" west, a distance of 111.05 feet to a tangent curve to the right having a radius of 245 feet; thence northwesterly along said curve through a central angle of 48°01' 02", an arc distance of 205.32 feet; thence north 41°43 ' 00" west, a distance of 201.41 feet to a tangent curve to the right having a radius of 245 feet; thence northerly along said curve through a central angle of 41°11' 18", an arc distance of 176. 12 feet; thence north 01°35' 52" west, a distance of 13 . 79 feet to a point on the south line of a tract of land described in lease to Standard Oil Company of California dated January 21, 1964, and recorded under Recording Number 5758271; thence north 89°28' 13" east, along said south line, a distance of 10.09 feet to the southeast corner of said tract; thence north 00°31' 47" west along the east line of said land, a distance of 211. 12 feet to the southerly margin of Grady Way (also known as Secondary State Highway No. 1-D) being 100 feet in width as presently established; ' thence northeasterly along said south margin, north 77°28'26" east, a distance of 203 .55 feet to a tangent curve to the left having _a radius of 3869.71 feet; thence along said curve through a central angle of 11°14' 08", an arc distance of 758. 84 feet to a point on the west line of a tract of land described in Exhibit "A" of Quit Claim Deed under King County Recording Number 8208270355; thence leaving said south margin of Grady Way, south 01°04'08" west along said west line, a distance of 840.76 feet to the north margin of Renton Village Place, as conveyed to the City of Renton by deed recorded under Recording Number 5475310; (continued) • Order No. 121025 SHORT PLAT CERTIFICATE SCHEDULE A Page 3 LEGAL DESCRIPTION, continued: thence north 89°44' 02" west, a distance of 372 . 42 feet along the north margin of said Renton Village Place to the east margin of vacated said 96th Avenue South; thence south 01°04' 08" west along said east margin, a distance of 60.01 feet to the southwest corner of said Renton Village Place; thence north 89°44' 02" west, a distance of 48.28 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; (ALSO KNOWN AS Lot C of City of Renton LLA-001-88 recorded under King County Recording Number 8911139006 and 9004099029) . END OF SCHEDULE A . . A . 1 . d 1' cam. ( : ( . . .._r -1. S _tivART •TITLE . J• � _ of Washinf,ton, Inc_ - _ r . ORDER NO. /. /0�J' • IMPORT,NT•This is not a Plat of Survey. It is furn:sned as a convenience to locate the land indicated hereon wttn reference to streets ano other land_No liat7:lity is assumeo by reason at reliance nerean. J1-13111= p C-73 .T fro !/ 1 y31 a�Mk r w,^ .. .+1`e" ��'"' N / 5/3) Y`} • 1v v S� O �� /J. �68 i 11 4'�i ',3u : a,iZr•S M R, • 3�a4 - s s'' S+• 1 147fel R.�er? r S G) 30 so • s • bolo 1�so(.D i WW _� ;• o .. .33s ho Ctr x �I Z 0 Y i . b CI ` � , 1T-r- — —— Ai 11.9-ss-sr..v 1 _ 7.••• •ti • . Z. 5 .01 .'•0 C. kl C CITY 1'?0F 0 z` • . , ► • SFg7.w 9TH.i A E. S. vac. L, x �.�3s4 • M-��/\-' -- -- F — Dlta. No. �O$l o_Z), i3 �,i. O \ 4 ao 4S.‘a io r6 r5 14 rL rr ip 9 7 i S 4 S 2 1 0 :E, ` . h g og0Pc,' °• --- , : ti t 6.0a • 1 ��� • Q511•2 k�V s^ \ ` \ I , M ., Lr O,._ A 'r A • 'A1/45,1ATt O = O tit). .10. 20J1 - 4 • - ' :� ' �� {, �� SOUTH R ENTO N • • 4. a3 • C •-.4 L 5is. ?6 " .n Ater•.4 •ee .C..Z-- -/ - .. - .7 4.�� ^ !11-4�-0 I. BG7.7t - u •LbeLT 21 Zs SIJ r !O / • .�is sa s sb s> >a s���� � • S TO C K `-'—v - ✓��'/.'�7n .so 29 o v STATE • • • . • i I •, , ta-LVVIT,• . W..... . 1 Z•a'f.: . ," ..,-7,PIZ.' • '-- "-',--r7-';‘,, ::"J-eS".•"- ;., .• .._...k.A:. --- ....," 1::,..4W.-.4.:-.:C.-..1:71,-.---..7_"-••=1'W:.•....•: ,, .-s'.4 '8:.:1r. "..' 1'-':-'''','--- ,t---,:,.'''' 4,1t. , .,.;_t--..... 4. ...,,.... - • -,7,77..').;ztt,tr.t.••.:;t4' •!--.........:.`"•.,..,:.. ,,....;;,.• ,''::"•r-., +A. , ,-,...0' ..*.,•1-'4:. . .,*:•-":".0'2'.- 1.e. --.--•-..-.4'''' ''''''•:., "e.,•-•......,--;:.'1',f;:"-C,.', . "..---'- "•'''-'7 -,., '' • -- .-A::',.,--,..., .; ',.. • ' ' • r`. : ''''--,.::-14.:11.*s2i:... -.. • --,! .,-.-..----- -- 15.st-'s.?7*.7-1-;„:,:-.i;„•,'n.-,-.-:y.*-..".--1-,,-.....,-AV-- , . 4z ,-. - 44 i' . 4"i'.hcf..-.1. - ;"-4- i_ /.•-0.-,-,,;A:0--4..7.,-,A.ti;-r, . .. • .. . • "w...-- --7-__-**K.......--- 4:2- z,-'--2.., ,,.2.0',06:--i.....49.2-..... • . - ..• . • .. ._ - .- --..-e • --- - -1-..:' .,....- - - -..,,,, - .- -... _....•_ '• -4:.--..---`-z-s,-....---- ‘‘..,-...-, - Lwiireft,#ve..4,- . . . • . .....oviei!--1 'Ltd ....4---:-_,-,,,, :" -.::.. -,-, .- -•.••7-...,'.44:: •"''..X 4" ' '..4..*•- '..]"' '.......,* . - - --.'• — ..,:• ...:6ST:.::..i.:•:Pt.....1. ..:,-.1.,.'-,....3.,- ' •'-,- •-- - _.•=•-. ,- `-'..• ''::•';'' ' •'''..:. ...ZygS10..1;;Aii:VI•tr-..,, - ,i-• •.....,:•i•..171%.7 .,..firi.7.•-z, 1 . `I ' 7 .** trt--. .s -v .a, • --V•+4--.. ..- . . _ „ .. . -,-,.....,.4i.a. %ow.'. '...t.›, -- "z"?..4- .• ..... 10 --•-:..e.3• .: ••• -....... -_-,.A•- . .....1-4.5.!.., '. 4-1-.-4/1.:4-.%.,-Y-C..-4.7..-:-.',..7... -•-- -: - -kfl.e.-.- ‘'''''''V-,.C.. P.ITr. ,PNISTI ---.--;'-'•-•irio.-1.,"''. •,--"...=.....-ti.- , ..,. •............ ....., ..... - j5..' ‘, r v,'7 ....**.-.•----- --:•:• .y.,A44.0,...c. . -•i„:-.!:.,s-7,;1•-:•.--4-- ::--•' • - _7. ..--- .,,,........„:_,__.......z,-..- ....-i-7:-_,•.....:- ,4,• ..,'` ..-0 ,..,„ *.-jo,...-7-t-A-ftt, 7'...-ir''.7-''':•"' .,..1- ,i.- ".";'•Aer ..., 1,44V,....2'.-''.5- .-- c..72.......,-..r,r,..:,A,,,---,:-; 50•-•: ..,..:.-f-44.1.;.1.,y•416-4,'".!.. - N. dV-.....4,........44. '''.....• '. ..‘ ' ....`"•-:.,tvi.....- -..414-- .. - • . ,.."'"$*.i.*"...-",..''''40.:-.4,•-•3:11. •••-.--,..:74,--2,6-..-.5-,..a....c.-'%-.... •''.'...to. -....44es:6-;i1•04 P. -..'„-,tri..,• .,. ..A:44,41,-.,.:.:.•: ....1.,:%:-. ..--. --_---,-,c;.,,-.4,...-,5.-----,.:,.----',41T-r_ki!"...,i- • 1.:•-•._,. '...'".,-* _„.."--••,,,.r.e,....•.1,• . 7 ft:rot.-,--.-... :-;....t--. %-7-----t-4-.-At•-::,-"-'::, '4Zit1:1':4-r.•:"1:-•-.W.17411. e: '.4,,OC:i; ...'''.'...;<;'?;,-.. 'i-....'t._..„-..,"•;;Nif-....?.-.:':s ; 7- ----..'-,..4.s."--,..r.-....„, * •."•••:triler",'*".•••....-"*"..*P7`.5N• p.•,.•',:•••00.7,!..‘•'•••--..00-:.:,. ...,:::::'• .-..4.4s.g".... -. ,..7.4:;-:-,:r .,--1&,.T., ..:- ....4-.,......ar,:- -,"..-4....S.C-,.....)w.,.--v--4...--.. .......7.c.-..4.4,1.V......,.....151.`.-"'.4--...,„...-Rd."'7".,..,..r•-_,.."_tf.....-a..- ;,-.%.A • .4..... ri:''''.'-•..i.-,,‘..- ...:•"- ....yi.....•'...:-N'.--;•..Z.7.-- -.- ... -40",:-..4.1N.fi,:•.. ..-. •-••• ••••••P , : ...---•-.. '7 .,W-'.'....1.".. -.:ifigig.".•::-&-.6.;:.-,v•,• .. --- .. L Jump Touch Beam Run ,spnn g Up 869-22947 Structure 869-22842 Structure 869-52857 Sign 1869-22837 Structure 86.9-52847 Sign 869-52852 Sign • - -•.• •-- :...--, :%,-T.---.`a..-;*:•;,,, . . . ---------.-----:-,---.- l'Isiii -'—.',:.•••-•.,, .4ffe;,:t ,:z" ,'--,•.1's•-•-:-- ... ,. . . .. r---- - .. . , . .....-.... .--.--,:,.• .,... , . -7:'7 t''...!.."..*.4A:.-4-•,..-_,., - . • • t . e. . - ---- ---".--•Eft.. .--...-= . ;4. 'ft,, i'; ‘...f•I ,- P ._ .. . .... 4,...- •........,:;•:-..,,,....i.: • - '4:- :-:'.-!: • •:...; •••••--..•..,•4.'17 "*.f • . ,..;,......._ . . ...•-•-"frOrP '-"!'" ..,••=t;.''-`..... ..... ?•-•••••. ..••.,,.•S• .. •• : •t Y''.4' '1 - ,s..: :',.• "_....t.• t+.• _-_:. - " :: :•. -.;:t7'• :el.;flk..,`F•ler-••_,-.'••4Ar,."--' ,-•:'".1%..-Yt,-.,:-;••.. •' • '• .... ..,-,.... rx„.7....:_ ..--••••= -:.•thZ, .'` ' '•'...,:.•,r-,... ;Z.-......:,,... ,..•••••••,..: -_ '''-;z7:::'' • ..:-, '••.'"'• -• :,-."..----- - ',,%•••. '-'• A-+.7.••,.."' .4..t.l."... ,• '...,•4.:•Nt...1.•., ....., : •,...f.444.1 .• '1,,,,:: ,......... ''''..' ... X.-:" ..: :.•• . -": ''.. ' .. ' . . ' . •-.iZi...$;lket at ...-.S.; ll:'.1.44,--'...4''''''S1:41.-.4 ...-.75.'...........' 114...."'C'e•••'rj.Z...%.: •,..;•.--',..;." . ' ' -.•_: . - - • ,.......-..-.'.1.....-, ' . -- - •' . '-''.• -..,•-...N.-.. 011,0....t. --.v••"9.1.1"'-=''''-,;••••e'"•Z'...; ::..:::::. A - -.• . ',.--- ,...--) .s..:". ...;-;-':' . , - • . .. • .... - . : . ... . •:,...,_-..i.r. -,. ...7..,....-.vt.; .,„ ...., .._... . - ..;-.•--• -.. ..... .6...--. - ..-- !•.--. ,.•.-: 7-:- .r.ri,.-F,-.17.-• " :-;..,,...e ' " s•.t".?`.':;'.: .. -Tr?-.:--_• - .'.-=-: 7'40,4 -...;1 •F",t-' ;:'41,....'""•:,..."' .-....- .-..,... -.. ....% :!,:...,.. :l .'•. ...- , , . . .....;:.1.!‘..54,71...,..•:......,...:.:'';.1......t. .!..rral....%•••• - t :..--.7- " '....'-'-' - - - -i-'4"--- ----- 07':"-s,qr.-N---•.i. -..-4.------:---. - - - - -4-4.--,;:_•,.. . oft-- ,-L-. -- -• -• -- — Horizontal Ladder* Step Up Parallel Bars* 869-22863 Structure 869-22857 Structure 869-528'72 Sign 869-22853 Structure 869-52867 Sign 869-52862 Sign •• ___., .. • •,.-..-..,,..-,-,;....- - ..,..-- .,-...,-,. - !--''',-,-;,/. ..,;'-•:•,••,i,'--- 1--_':';.- ...--,?:----. --- •--4. . . . -:" ;•-t,,.v1.--7f.-‘ .,:•,,c:).-t1,,----- -- • .:•-$-- - -- ..,„ ..,...-...-- :. -.-... _ . -,.. • ... - .. .. 7--•--..:..,.."-.,:r..;...,:-.7-;,,,:r-:._;.,,,....;....--,...t.....1t7-2.:;•,,.w-:62;:-._::...,..... 1.1...7.77.,. ..,•:,:.-., ...-:,----..:41 -, ___. .----,..,-.7040?-0,... •lim--z-..i, .. • • . ,- - --r-Irri.„7,....:•;,-.- _-?,---,.: = ....- -. . •;:0"-•,.4ir- , . _... -.,. , f '''' .... '... -Z - le I( ,• • . . , - li.;....-.... ' - Z-1,..,L;.7.,, ATEVAWitgritt.-_-$,V, ', ,,,,-•- • . 40'4: . -1,--0..., :...r•-•,.....,,g,.......-4 . 4,,........t...-•s..•,.%,..- ‘• , . . • . --V..-- ' t4.447,-/-1;e-7'•'• 6-.... .....y...._' --•••*•-•"*.;:c7..'...4-..- '• ---.-A„... --."-'• --Pr: Ts....'t.:701g--11WtAllttlt...P;1.4.. ill'...:.*14'.• --•'--..-- ..-i• "-Yr '--i•"-:$ -.....-'-:?1-..`r-tt"-Idij.: ".-- ....- ,....., ...„,,,...,,,,,........Zo..1...?+ow-Al.:4z.. A..,....,:--.10.*".:: 311/4,.... .r.44.4Krzt>-C.:25 ..-• .--5.----4......"."Wit.4. - • ..44..^....,. ....AL.:,,..--..5.. ...z.,..-.- ''.*-- - ••••• ‘44-':' ii.,-.- ' ..,, '-....--,!-: . , : _•":.--; ,,,...--',/'. — ' ......... 0-•;,...ver.T.;..siga *0:717.4:: . ••,,.....•:„.cri:Z...,,,-.'if.4.*.-.,_- ' "ses,,,t•• S:_,Z47...-r-i. I._ -41 .,,-...i..•Z`f-.A` •-.„‘„,_:.: - t''-', r--• ','''''-. ' _ 'ell•Vr.‘Lt,_... 4.•..$1f -''''....„ ......-:...".....:, ''''....T).” ......•4•"..,:k.S.' ...' ;?!..-_,s...-. 4.-,,,,,,.._r t.f arc.:.#7.--,-.., ..-.:-_, ..-.4.. '-.491e.r.t. ,,....:_:-...4,,,..- .?.?" '.'.-Ir... •'''.'7--.... ..%,,,x04irt ...--.-.....1.....--37W;...,,---72,...:, ''..A.47._-_-- -'''':•-."-,..4.-1.%.;....- .., 'ir ....I..c -.,..,. ... ' '-'.• ".• '''"W:"..-Alkoa,-::",;17r.•'1",ti.. 14-.1....., .....;. •----..t.-...t.i.,-tvz-.........--Ew::. ....---aikt.:.-.,.-...a,,,-.... ........z..- '.; ....,-- -....z._ • .3'::..--1.::.'f.A." .k::-'''.-•'-. • .. • . ....- 7-_:,..7...„,.:,-,.-....,,..,.;_gi .4 r--1,4•,•• ..-•...--••:•• . ...- .:•,..:-...—Ira-—- iit•Vj.i.".•..,.7.Lorr..r r:!,--••••;• ,. . .?.....;;,.-:,...'..•-",-, --.Ji. • • • Cool Down* , Calf Stretch* 011 Balance Beam Calf Structure 869-22872 Structure 882-0605 Structure 869_52897 Sign 869-52877 Sign 869-52882 Sign Landscape Structures 85 . . _- I VitaCourse 2000 Steel Structures _ Our steel structures feature brown -/ powder-coated and/or galvanized steel . - '' . supporting members. Sitting and laying _'. w woo.: ; surfaces are TenderTuff coated to �- �,f' * '`� Nuivor�"` - eliminate temperature extremes and Y .. provide a softer finish. Sign plaques are '`- _, F ` . . , _ `� attached to the frames in the factory. • �. i L g All structures and signs are included in the :�--ea-ea �-r_ 20-station complete system.Those marked - - d ..,,,., ' ` 'K ; with an'are included in the 10-station ,tc ' -' ` `� s :., � -,.---- 4 `•` �' complete system. .-, - K .- . _ ���. : moo_=' ,,.,s' , - 869-22802 Introduction Complex _ _ ., ;r 74 �? zrb ' ., 47 i--. ? t a -T .-4-; �. yam. -1:. i z+. ,.,'4. .f .- • -, A % .�" 'a..tia - _ ( -s - ! w' t r • tr t.r t •i * • �r e2 r of.' 5 y -st w r R'a f leftl ? Li :-1�^ 41--,*- _ Y`• 'S ? dies. _' 'F .mod r <. '-T _t S.q.,, = tom. ` J , ';1;,s,=s.�+ct , `�^- ". Y10./ +(. , i7.'..e'R''^ :,�rti.t i ,... •- --•- v .. j4y.Y tV ..-. - r = tIV.-te y�.. .. c_ Warm-Up* Pullup Vault Beam* 882-0605 Structure 869-22812 Structure 869-22817 Structure 869-52812 Sign 869-52827 Sign 869-52832 Sign 1 r yea... =OMRj`-W �+3p ( - t•05,•�y thy. yY .._ti„ I iM tipF .'Fc�+ - .� �y- v `- ...i. .• .-mac_y` � ��. `,• fir-. 4-�7 "� n .i .�� =-z.-. _ L> _-+ti"1`'• -- 'Cu r a._- M._ � :_ y... . . '-;.;. >_ --i. -':r .--lie'. ,-••..'ati<. s-.- Isometric Squat Sit-Up* Vertical Ladder 869-22822 Structure 869-22827 Structure 869-22832 Structure 869-52822 Sign 869-52837 Sign 869-52842 Sy� — 5 1990 k.... I tic‘..,ty6 84 Landscape Structures AT TAC H M E N T ow. 4, re THE Innovation takes shape. Award-winning design. Maximum s.curbty Ribbon Rack BRANoiR 2 12d Br The Ribbon Rack.The most innovative and The Ribbon Rack's unusual design makes From its aesthetic form comes the Ribbon The Ribbon Rack \ unique bicycle rack ever.Graceful curves of other bicycle racks obsolete.Its open Rack'principal function—providing maxi- Is compatible with all RIBBON® tubular steel,sculpted to fit,and enhance configuration saves space and keeps areas mum security for bicycles and mopeds.Its standard locks and chains, r any architectural setting.The Ribbon Rack. orderly.That's because the Ribbon Rack heavy gauge,one-piece tubular construe- Including • Recognized by the IDSA"for its elegance holds twice as many bicycles or mopeds as 'ion makes the Ribbon Rack truly theft and popular high security i RACK and.simplicity while providing maximum conventional racks in the same space.Its wndalprunf.Its open design allows the bi- horseshoe- cycle functional security."And recognized by free form makes the Ribbon Rack the safest cycle frame and both wheels to be fastened shaped locks. architects everywhere for its striking rack you can find,because it has no sharp securely and completely upright.The + harmony of form and tuncuoo. edges or conRibbon rers that cause injury.Its rust- Rack accommodates all size bin- • proof galvanized steel makes the Ribbon des.Plus,all standard locks and chains, Rack durable.maintenance-free and including the popular high-security horse- - j — weather-resistant. shoe-shaped lucks,arc easily attached. • - .(.:: - 1 .. . /, • \ . • Recognized I l , > ) ,lioy • ' for its elegance and Ili 1.... , ,i . • 1• .�.,4. • :• :: .1 • -- - simplicity Y _ • � while providing• • •<:',•:.: • 4 • •i,...p,i4fiiil . i.. .,... . :It p' 4N ;: functional security 71 a. a • its:: 4. , '1'. t:t Industrial[ksigners Society of America •. i`: Model RB-7 • Saving space: One live fool Ribbon Rack(Model RB-7,above)holds seven /I J bicycles.Bicycles are placed alternately through open spaces yielding double the storage of conventional racks. ' ' I r ,- Y , • tit: {1 [] o •7.-elfrlt 4.t, n 1? ;y rc{ r a '' ' dA, q • i ,, I r �iiP 1_+11 pa+� r : .,4v Ln ,r' y''tyf��'�'. -fire �' . .. i1iE .' 1 I'NF.At'�' YIW t r' i-.t• r • 1 1.j `., C aa��� .S .p 'I • CD E I. dl 4. t l! �; . cn E ui t m v Ir) `O • r✓ r a, CD p v, m o E Itfw • I. ` m Rs p co E N �: .� • • 4-,,'• •� C j C N N T d z > 1 - • ' ,cry •.+' •• E 111111111 4y) • •3>t 1 I s'•...' ....e..sf°:�.. ... ,N. . m it • • ` :ems^ Recessed luminaires with white safety . glass diffusers. Lti e Suitable for wet locations. K Color Black 1 " == <; A — - c — 2289 Opening:9'/4x2%x2% ' ;�, `` ;; :.; 5/e • • 2287 Opening: 11 x 23Ys x 2�e ' j". 1_ Concrete or masonry only.,: ;.}:•_:: Lamp Lumen C ::;:. 'i: :`g; :. g .,:.;=7 • . 2289P Location Light. 1 9W PL 600 91/2 29/16 2% e ;y" `'_' i!\ `�;? �'Z. 'ire,::;-.!,..` -. ' 2287P Location Light 1 13W PL 900 1113/16 29/16 25/s ;'�:; "� 'c k`°::<1`^'''' ` . 2::1.xis,`•'�::Iil3:�ii..::1�t?,'L:s��:":1:�.,t- :.•..;.. ,..., • t b:,o•; Recessed luminaires with white safety ;o glass diffusers. • —1. e Suitable for wet locations. • •'' 1 ':�o,o:• Color Black A — - c — 2179 Opening: 10%x33/4x31/4 - ,: r''•• ' - 2188 Opening: 143/,6x43/ex3/4 t �:.:•• . �., • 1_ 2189 Opening: - = •''. =1" . : .tip: t t. • Lumen A B C ',q.fir•.~,'''.;- :};.s;�tirt 1,, :�z':..;t;:•,....:,,;; Lamp •1: .;--=`����,-r��:��N�s,'_•_:-L.:`-�' :.1.:.. 2179 Location Light 1 18W PLC 1250 , 5 e 1t' :`:'3a" °"�}�yy'�k' ':a'y' = `` t 11 3/16 4/16 3/16 x'`dti•. a ti.: ?•*fi4F �+.''•••: , 2188P Location Light 1 26W PLC 1800 •.; �'`4^&:T t .'•_4 s<':."{"•, �•' :t g 153/4 5% 33/4 '_r`; ^ ' -` .•N<L41•`tl, ''v5 �: .a •• =i:•+ 2189P Location'Light 2 18W PLC 2500 1911/1s 1 ;:,.'/-t,,,iwli•; .; ti ,-•`t 5 5/e 33/4' :;,,F "t" Ut to5 k•> + :may, Recessed luminaires with die-cast aluminum li ; •,; louvers and clear safety glass. - • - J �`�`�'� Suitable for wet locations. • • � 't' Color: Black . ' A - - c - 2288 Opening:91/4 x 23/8 x 25/e . • 2286 Opening: 115/s x 2%x 25/8 f ```7 ; Concrete or masonry only.�� Y.' i Lamp Lumen A B C 2288P Location Light 1 9W PL 600 91/2 29/16 25/e 2286P Location Light 1 13W PL 900 1113/,s 29/,s 25/6 y? •-v.;; Recessed luminaires with die-cast aluminum 1 oa louvers and clear safety glass. s IL-_..._ i' 1 e ;� Suitable for wet locations. 1 •1 '� Color. Black i _ • A — — c — 2079 Opening: 105/e x 33/4 x 3'/4 s �: ' 3 3 , .. . : .. .,.'.�.L. .' 2082 Opening: 14/16 x 4/a x 3/4 4- -L_.L -. A 1 2083 Opening: 18'/e x 43/e x 3'/4 I ='s•:~: Lamp Lumen A B C ' 2079P Location Li ght 1 18W PLC .. 1250 1113/,s 45hs 39/,s :=:.;'� _.1 ,;-:,: - _ • 2082P Location Light 1 26W PLC 1800 153/4 5'/a 33/4 `, 2083P Location Light 2 18W PLC 250Q 1911/16 5'/e 33/4 7 BEGA i,. • - ' - r warning:This fixture must be 8" Round 7—Yr� ; / Drawings grounded in accordance with __ Specifications local codes or the National '~' " Electric Code. Failure to do c ,83o a 4,03 . 2.77v. See page 12 for so may result In serious photometrics personal injury. I,,A I ' .- - \ „11. t Aw::' q ' Light Cenler • . . ;' r wrx .. • V't,�q Helpnt • • • ti •': "`.-`: -` A`• `'.• . , .. •iis , �'r•�Pr. , 7�`�✓-i ' . '-..1 :r ' •: ii.,.: .. Anchor Bolt._-. Ay ) '� , .v ty 07, s.F•:• PreiesUon a , : .7' : • .a. +d: • 'n Concrete Footing 3yOt11ete conduit Opening 6" •t � 'x+3 •- c •. t c Krr, -• Pia. Bolt Circle Specifications Post Construction—One-piece extruded aluminum,.125" Gasketing--Fixture Is fully gasketed for weathertight wall thickness,with heavy cast aluminum twist-lock anchor operation. , base concealed within the post. Wiring-Supplied with high temperature socket leads for field Plastic Enclosure—One-piece injection molded,optically connection to the prewlred ballast components. clear)100%virgin acrylic,Y."nominal wall,retained In an Ballast—High power factor for —20°F.starting,factory unstressed position by internal support through the reflector mounted to the anchor base,and prewired. assembly. Top Cap—One-piece heavy gauge spun aluminum,retained Anchor Bolts—Supplied with four Ye x 10" + 2"zinc electro- by 2 counter sunk captive socket head fasteners,and braced plated L hook anchor bolts,each with 2 nuts and washers,and at the outer edges by the optical assembly.3"thick insulation a rigid pressed board template. provided above lamp. Finish—Standard finish is TGIC Polyester Powder-Coat Optical Assembl —Precision h rotormed optical buyers Paint.Optional anodized finishes are available Inaccordance '"� with specular Alzak®finish,mounted and removable as a one with Architectural Class I specifications,and are applied over piece self-contained unit. 14"satin polish. Socket—Porcelain with nickel plated lamp grip screw shell, Certification—,All H.I.D,fixtures are Underwriter's rated 600 volts.A special 5KV pulse rated socket will be Laboratories Inc.listed.Photometric data provided by an provided for all High Pressure Sodium lamps estabiished and certified Independent laboratory. AuttA Kann I Inhtrnes _,-ecar-,:ment d7 i rans;GRctlG.� i` Federal Aviation Administration ,-r'c^sccr•�cr• Northwest Mountain Region . AE; ONAUTICAL STUD r FeCerat Aviation 17900 Pacific Highway South No: 39-ANM-0435-0E l•. Administration C-6896o Seattle, Washington 98168 . . -u , 1989 • ATTN: ANM-530 • • g:NION VILLAGE 'RNGT CORP • eACKNOWLEDGMENT OF NOTICE OF PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION OR ALTERATION Renton Pillage Management Coop. CONSTRUCTION LOCATION oc 15 Grady Way 4509 • PuCzmwe v, Renton, Washington 98055 z • • a Renton, Washington H - LATITUDE I LCNGrtuce • • 47°28115"N 1122°12110"'W OESCAIPflCN !+eGHT•IN FEET) CONSTRUCTION mime Gamma AacVE'+sl PROPOSED 12 story building 170 198 The Federal Aviation Administration nereoy acknowledges receipt of nonce dated concerning tie proposed construction or alteration described above. A study has been conducted underlie provisions of Part 77 of the Federal Aviation Regulations to determine whethertheproposedmreaUCtion would be an obstruction to air navigation,wnetner it would be marked and lighted to ennance safety in air navigation.andwhethersuppiemental notice of start and completion at construction is required to permit timely charring and notification to airmen.The findings of thazs say are as • follows: ❑ The proposed construction does not require a nonce to FAA. . ( ❑ The proposed construction is not identified as an obstruction under any standard of FAR.Part 77,Subpart C and would not be a hazard to air navigation. . ❑ The proposed construction is identified as an obstruction under the standards of FAR.Part Ti.Subpart C but would not beahaz d to air navigation. • 0 The structure should be obstruction marked and lignted per FAA Advisory Circular AC 70/7460-i,-Obstruction Mar[dng and l_ignting."Chapters 0 Supplemental notice is required at least 48 hours before the start of construction and within five days atter consbueon readies its • greatest height(use the enclosed FAA forms. , .. This determination expires on • unless (a)extended,revised or terminated by the issuing office: (b) the construction is subject to the licensing authcnty of the Federal Communications Commission and an application for a construction permit is made to the FCC on or before the above expiration date.In such case the determination expires an the date prescribed by the FCC for completion of corstruchon.or on the date the FCC denies the application. NOTE Any request for extension of the effective period of this determination must be postmarked or delivered to the issuing ofbosat least 15 days prior to the expiration data az The proposed construction would exceed Part 77 obstruction standards and further aeronautical study is necessary to determine whether it would be a hazard to air navigation.Pending completion of any further study,it is presumed tfteconstructon wand be a hazard to air navigation.Further study • - ❑ Has been initiated by the FAA. • ® May be requested by the sponsor within 30 days of date of this acknowledgement • if t5e proposed structure were reduced in height to not exceed 131 ft above ground level( 159 ft above sea I ��1 �DIVISION not exeed Part 77 atrsatrction standards CiTY OF RENTON If the structure is subject to the licensing aumonty of de FCC,a copy of this acknowledgment will be sent to that Agency. NOTICE IS RECUIRED ANYTIME THE PROJECT iS ABANDONED OR THE PROPOSAL IS MODIFIED. JUL - 5 1990 ATTACHMEI *- i§ .... ilit,truy /0,w • . . • . SIGNED. . Jerry W. Parker , Airspace and Procedures Soeciali st IssUEOIN Seattle, 'Washington • aN August 2d, 1989 Callison To: d Date: ‘00, '•/10.6 �D r Project No: el,CLar • /Transmittal 0 Memorandum Re: /agriI 4111 We are sending you ttached 0 Under separate cover ❑ the following: ❑ Prints 0 Originals ❑ ❑Submittal 0 Samples 0 For your: 0 Information and use 1eview and comment ❑As requested Action required: 0 As indicated 0 No action required 0 For signature and return 6r ___451etk AtAL/17fre /4.° 7,12,41—CifIr26:77"17-721/ 42—L)—ArOOlite44Z PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF RENTON • JUL - 5 19s0 1 ,emsgV'ED► • B %/�? cc: If enclosures are not as noted kindly notify us at once. 0 Corporate Headquarters: 0 California Office: The Callison Partnership Ltd. Architecture 1420 Fifth Avenue 950 Sixth Avenue A Corporation Programming Suite 2400 Suite 200 Planning Seattle,Washington San Diego,California Interior Design 98101 92101 Graphics (206)623-4646 (619)232-3233 FAX:206-623-4625 FAX:619-232-3337 David P.Lindsey,Architect DUPLICATE RECEIPT DUFLIATE RECEIPT CIT`t OF RENTON CITY TREASURER REG.!RCF'T 02-085Y4 0o-21-1990 CASHIER ID : C 1:30 PM 000 MISCELLANEOUS RE TREE CUTTING REVIEW 15ti,i_�;i 999.999.99.999.99.99.999999 8000 I1ISCELLANEOUS RE SITE PLAN APPROVAL t97u�i,ii�,i 999.999.99,999.99.99.999999 TOTAL DUE -----$4g91O.00 RECEIVED FROM: , C:ALLISON & RENTON VILLAGE ASSO CHECK $4:910.n0 TOTAL TENDERED _-.--. $41,910,1a0 CHANGE DUE $0.00 DUPLICATE - RECEIPT DUPLICATE RECEIPT PLANNING & ZONING FEES NAME: 1 (/zi C me c._) PROJECT: 1"i2af, n ) ..........:.......::...:..::.:.:::,.p.. �.,:.;�.;:.:.;:::.::>:>:::::;;::•;:;:::.:.:.:.;:. :;. :::;:<Revenue:>A cco.0 n t�::«:>:.>:>::>:«:::»>:::: :.:::::::.;:_:... . .. ..... .... .. ........ .::::.... :: :::: :: � ::.; Am oupt� : = ..T ranco d e:.. Annexation Fees 000/000/345.81 .00.02 Appeals & Waivers 000/000/345.81 .00.03 • Binding Site Plan/Short Plat 000/000/345.81.00.04 Comprehensive Plan Amendment 000/000/345.81.00.05 • Conditional Use Fees 000/000/345.81 .00.06 VCp'O Environmental Review Fees 000/000/345.81.00.07 . Preliminary Plat 000/000/345.81 .00.08 I 50% Final Plat (General Fund) 000/000/345.81 .00.09 50% Final Plat (Park Fund) 101/000/345.81`.00.00 . Final/Preliminary PUD 000/000/345.81 .00.10 Grading & Filling Fees 000/000/345.81 .00.11 Lot Line Adjustment 000/000/345.81 .00.12 Mobile Home Parks . 000/000/345.81.00,13 Rezone 000/000/345.81 .00.14 Routine Vegetation Mgmt Fees 000/000/345.81 .00.15 /5(j, p0 Shoreline Substantial Dev Fees 000/000/345.81.00.16 Site Plan Approval 000/000/345.81.00.17 Special/Temporary Review Fees 000/000/345.81 .00.18 Variance Fees 000/000/345.81 .00.19 300, 00 Other Misc Planning/Zoning Fees 000/000/345.81.00.20 Maps 000/000/341 .50.00.00 7041 Photo Copies 000/000/341.60.00.24 Publications 000/000/341.60.00,24 Postage 000/000/369.90.00.18 7055 Sales Tax 000/000/231.70.00.00 9998 OTAL BY: // sC /V-4" / L37 DATE: , -- ' •I, 0 • ,,‘4"""' ' . `" .-,''.‘4.1 /,'1?)VO, , - . t 1 1.., ', • • 41,-...i.,1,,,,,4'. ''"' N''''''.:'', rt.• '' 'CI,,': •''''''‘ ' 't-' ''V' '‘'''.1 yil ''rtti, "'iti 4 'a 4''''4'"*"'"''is'i' ' '' ''Ir- ': 'jVt V'tk ft:i:0301\'.:2;1'f.I' t ''''',\ '''-''4 - 1, ' •0, 1,-, ,\;,, ,,t,-;11, t.,.,.. t' • . ,„,....-'-'- '' ''''-''- ..,,,,p-,•• T,',A`tz,rlit\Niqq*\ illk k\d'4'.i.1 i''\‘:'t'A', '''. I.,' . ' ' '''' .".11.• it r, ,,,, nI', -• 1 '''Ill' 1,,k1 XINA:O. to .:,?v;i'. 1 ',..• ... ' lj% V..tar, /2,&ce_ po,(4j • - \.'A, . , , :', -• \ .:t•kglii21,\ Descriptioniiiimili::::::::::::ei:•.i.ii,:;:;::::,,,,:::: ::::..ii.<,..:::* tl.,..Revenue i.,-.• Account::• i,,,.:.,::•:.::.:;,.:::. •: : ,,•::::,•-•.,Amount:.::..::.:,:..,..•.,••• . •:••.•,:. .•..:: •illA • t ... ..:J:..,.i:iiii::...i,:i:i*ii::::,* ,..::m: .::Iiiiiii:iii.g ... . . . .i .li:Ki;:::ia':iiiniN-:. . s.:;.-Ma:li''''.'.1.r 40.c Q-i.e.:. ,"•' „.}; 1,,,4,'k )n Fees 000/000/345.81.00.02 ',,•111 -4 t.'•: '1, ,,'1'• k Waivers 000/000/345.81 .00.03 " Vii.1'IAA 6 k 4 "",1:1 ite Plan/Short Plat 000/000/345.81.00.04 \`';' A 1,Vi ,;:vtil ensive Plan Amendment 000/000/345.81.00.05 :,k1 'ri- al Use Fees 000/000/34.5.81.00.06 (K&O ,O-Cs v ,,,,!= ,ti.• ,,,' i,i,-, iq. •iir ental Review Fees 000/000/345.81.00.07 5730 . 00 • ry Plat 000/000/345.81.00.08 I §'„,:ti.„'A• 7,'t,• I Plat (General Fund) 000m00t345.81 .00.09 ' '•.•.7-.1 t•A',..,,T,1- . , 1,01';• ' I Plat (Park Fund) 101/000/345.81.00.00 " i: ,'`,, 4S•4:•• i A iminary PUD 000/000/345.81 .00.10 . •'•li•, ''.'•('!'ll.t..ri'Ilt,1 k , Filling Fees 000/000/345.81.00.11 . ,,.1r4L•1',A1`,4..iNt‘' t adjustment 000/000/345.81.00.12 \ . 4:tIg.::,t/, '1,1 VA Ut• )me Parks • 000/000/345.81.00:13 . 1,,,, t ,;•o . , 000/000/345.81.00.14 ••. ;A..•,, ;Ili::: *e',.ii t,, a gelation Mgmt Fees . 000/000/345.81.00.15 00 • II . ...;,r,',.,6-, • .:14, . •f•Y,A,i ,W, , ',?„!;,,,i,t Substantial Dev Fees 000/000/345.81.00.16 41) e_.",-14,X7' pproval 000/000/345.81.00.17 \ ,i OK) ii.•...) •1•,"-4,, • .-1•*',1,111, riporary Review Fees 000/000/345.81 .00.18 N,._ '.'•'.‘1,0,tri,..I.Ait' V.A; 1,11'11 t'\II' kICP '!es 000/000/345.81.00.19 , so a. ,r,o .Z . ---------7 ..' i Planning/Zoning Fees 000/000/345.81.00.20 4',11,f•tit,l'•\7,! ''',Ff•44 rtlikii •''''C; ' '‘,.'it.': • ,..,..,,`•:' Vit,;:1 • = '14,1,0",:''''.'4.h'.'firi • • ...1,;t3) ,t 1. k br,.' ..Or'4'.1...s.f.1,4:q,..•-•4 41A 000/000/341.50.00.00 7041 1 1.,•14.t4t,?;•1:,, •!.; - 1. :lti• ''‘.'0 :4 i . '4 000/000/341.60.00.24 46 4,4;.1144,44'?‘ ti' 000/000/341.60.00.24 ';'64 VI.'li•-. i'„!,*:. 000/000/369,90.00.18 7055 ilt ',.), 000/000/231,70.00.00 • 9998 • iltr•Avt;• i;j•:' •' '..,,,6 — --L._ •...:.:::::im,:•.,•,••,"••,,..-........-..wi*if:*K:mmK.Nli•ii Rip:,...!,: = %.,i,:::. ::,...i. .,. .:1::::.: 11 ,1''3,:,f,"!N•4V 4 ii,i;.,;;:::-.::•••:•,iiiiiINYa: .. .g:*:.:*,:iiNiaI:i:IMI: ::::•.• :i :.-...•••••.....r...1.. . . . . ____ 1 tt, "Vtii q'4 • - • )_:!, .4,X.1.,« .., OF aeA. y �T ° NOTICE U \I Q Z Qe. 9jED s EPS OF PENDING SITE PLAN APPLICATION • DESCRIPTION : VILLAGE PLACE NORTH ECF;SA;CU;V-078-90 APPLICANT SEEKS: 1) A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR DEVELOPMENT OF A NEW TEN-STORY (95 FOOT) OFFICE/RETAIL SALES BUILDING; 2) SITE PLAN APPROVAL FOR RENOVATION (INCLUDING PARTIAL DEMOLITION) OF AN EXISTING RETAIL CENTER ON THE SUBJECT PROPERTY AND FOR RENOVATION •OF SERVICE AREAS (E.G., LANDSCAPING, INGRESS/EGRESS ROUTES, PARKING); • AND 3) A VARIANCE FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW PRIVATE ROADWAY TO SERVE THE DEVELOPMENT: GENERAL LOCATION AND/OR ADDRESS: RENTON VILLAGE CENTER/SOUTH GRADY WAY PUBLIC APPROVALS REQUIRED : ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW SITE PLAN APPROVAL BUILDING PERMIT PUBLIC COMMENTS WILL BE RECEIVED BY THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT ANYTIME PRIOR TO PUBLIC . HEARINGS AND DURING PUBLIC HEARINGS. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CALL THE CITY OF RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT 235-2550 THIS NOTICE NOT TO BE REMOVED WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION • U BOGLE&GATES P.L.L.C. A Professional Limited Liability Company LAW OFFICES Tacoma Financial Center Anchorage 1145 Broadway Plaza Bellevue CAROLYN A.LAKE Suite 1360 Portland Tacoma,Washington 98402-3502 Seattle Vancouver,B.C. Direct Dial: 593-4961 Main Office: (253)922-8446 Facsimile: (253)922-2711 Internet Email: clake@bogle.com 09197/12059 November 11, 1998 Fax&Mail Mike Katterman ----- Planning Division Manager i L. i r�k f City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South N O V 1 6 1996 Renton,WA 98055 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, NEIGHBORHOODS, Lr AND SI RA'E;. Li.NNMNG Re: Recession of Declaration for Road Improvements;Renton Village Associates v " Dear Mr. Kattermann: We represent potential purchasers of property located within the Renton Village Shopping Center in the City of Renton("Property"). We write to confirm that a Declaration of Covenant recorded against the subject property has been rescinded, or if not yet rescinded,we enclose the suitable rescission document for the City's approval and execution. Rescission is appropriate as discussed below. The Declaration of Covenant was issued in 1992 by Renton Village Associates as a condition of Renton's approval of Site Plan File No. SA-078-90. The City's approval authorized development of an office building. We understand that development of the office building has since been abandoned by the Property owner, and no doubt the City considers the 1992 permit approvals lapsed. Since the office development will not occur,the Covenant should be removed as an encumbrance against the Property. Any future development on this site will undergo its own,unique review and approval process. Our client's pending purchase is contingent upon this rescission. We look forward to receiving the City's consent as soon as possible,and please call me directly if you have any questions. Due to pending deadlines,we will follow up this fax with a phone call to the City tomorrow, Thursday, November 12, 1998. Thank you. Sincerely, &GATES P.L.L.C. Carolyn A.Lake Enclosure(s) • MICHAEL KATTERMANN // '1J _ ' peceiy.4 °fi/j5" paCW)f- ' -- t//e7 147-1.41 ''Ve7 'rcX .` 'Al �) • j • , , • a - sk-078-90 M y 1• • * 6 DELL SP2TION OP COV i' 8 9E - THI ) 'DECLARATION OF COVENANT ('Covenant' is made this of 15T I day of C•it xL.eig f, --- , 1992, by RENTON VILLAGE ASSOCIATES ('Declarant") for a future roadway dedication. • EXCITALS . . ' • A. Declarant owns certain real property located within the Renton Village Shopping Center in the City of Renton ('City"), • which is legally described in Exhibit g hereto and incorporated 3 . herein by reference ("Property0). • • B. Declarant intends to extend an iaprcved road to be r called Lake Avenue South, and legally described on Exhibit B H • -- attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference N ORoadvay■), through its Property in conjunction with the 5 construction of an office building on its Property. This O` Covenant is recorded to implement a condition of the City's B appp xa.L site plan Pile No. SA-078-90 for future dedication of 4 • - €he Roadway. N - i. 1.7` Now, therefore, Declarant hereby declares, conveys and establishes the following covenant: 1. Oblioatin to Dedicate Road Right-of-Way,. Declarant hereby covenants and agrees to dedicate to the City the right-of- way and improvements constituting the Roadway to the City to be used and maintained as a public street upon a request by the . City. 2. Covenant to Bun...vjbtho Land. This Covenant shall r141 with ! • land and be bindin. u. .n an . : • .it • ame . . . . ; on • 4‘d,r. • •.= 44TA.4•)s1.i:frsl f • _a,vgoadvav_• Upon dedication, s Covenant shall term nate automatically without any further action by Declarant or any other party. Prior to completion of such dedication, this Covenant may be amended andfor terminated only upon the express consent of the City. • . [ Q021.T\01407.N011/7.9.92 S.ittl. • - .. . • • • •• • • • • IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Covenant is executed effective upon . the date first above written. • • RENTON VILLAGE ASSOCIATES, a • Washington general partnership $y • Its Ge era Pa ner 0.11 Exhibit A - Legal Description of Property Exhibit $ - Legal Description of Road Right-of-Way • STATE OF WASEINGTON ) ss• • w 'y�. COUNTY OF KING W Y x N on this irg day of jr've�Ei( , 1992, before a., a Notary Publicn and for the State of Washington, personally .48 appeased/)i!(MR [,AF personally known to me (or proved to ae -.LaJ C3 on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person who ..,►- cV executed this instrument, on oAth stated that {1f. was O, authorized to execute the instrument, and acknowledged it as the General Partner of RENTON VILLAGE ASSOCIATES to be the free and ▪ 11, voluntary act and deed of said corporation for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. z a IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and official seal the day and year first above written. uq,, �µ ,� �� • ) i ! ` W o aft`p i YJ ': U inette•<d✓/ 'rti OLIO itd tl'. r �• t tp'; NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State 2 4. �;VI= of Washington, residing at ._� �✓ F. my appointment •expires /c -I • s - WAS44447.7... 4e;4 • . Goz4 ,„0,,AQ!/7.9.9z Saattl. 2 r - . 921029O251 0• • E7tflISI: A 1 of 3 ! - EX� !-1� - 0 ���� AREAS e �/ t'3'` e PROPOSED RIGHT OF WAY 57•86O SO.FT.s ,�� '�'� " �.•tir� LOTC-1 41.279 SO.FT� 2f4.3a7 SQ.FTs ,,,,;` :ate ../ *,-7 LOT C-2 _.� •Y'‘ 47 5.;%\A ��,.'�;J r 1= yaT3� , � +\ .y Li r1i; $ ��e_ a 11 •140‘psi •_! �•• • tie •a'- .r�r - CC��Ow±of oro.4� 401 s S• RO s. 111. : �S4Do < .o t lt : LOTltrw7.nw v Y 4 = C21 �swr t el � s+ ' - • Ili 1 Pill �se • '�i^ e � is f—•-�'_'LOT C d i i f • pcd'to1 t,»ES a • W-OQ1-d8 • 3: X�E'S7'JI�IV t k 1 4 ►r ur • b �'�'� cawFR ILIs-•-.i-'"""Ls - s ,{at••'34'K•X • K ' 'fP1f j ...7...e....- :i 1 -5 o }ems _ _ _ _ .iiiiiTh• / / , / 111 d:a0o7z4+0 .,re-..,4 p^fir -max. -t---a- �` `. clu - .ves t i >~ _ •s's�.�� cs. �+' R PL t Ito '} 'i �� 0 32x1Q 25h1Q • • • . EXHIBIT A 2 of 3 eLG'..-v 1 .40.ez" 5' '..e./ rim N.S" • BM , That portion of Slacks 11,12,14 and 15, C.D. Hillmans Earlington Carden Addition Division No. 1 as recorded its Volume .17 of Plata, . Page 74, Records of King County, Washington, together with portions of vacated 94th Avenue South, vacated 96th Avenue South, aacated • 9th Avenue .South, vacated 9th Place South, vacated 10th Avenue South and the vacated alleys between 9th Avenue South and 9th Place South • and also between =:t- Place South and 10th Avenue South, all vacated under Ordinance 20:4 of the City of Renton and that portion of the . ' northeast quarter of Section 19, l'oWnship 23 North, Range 5 East, ' W.M. in King County, Washington, more particularly described as follows: i Commencing at the northeast caner of the southwest quarter of said northeast quarter; thence S 01 04'08" W along the east line of said southwest quarter. a distance of 250.02 feet; thence N 89°44'02" W, a distance of 18.28 feet to the TRUE POINT OF 8ECINNINr.; thence • , S 61°a2'59" W, a distance of 258.92 feet; thence S 00°02'16" E, gr a distance of 248.94 feet to the northerly margin of Primary State '11 Highway No. 1. Jct. SSH No. 2-M to Jr.r Psh No. 2 in Renton (also ). known as State Road No. 405) as approved October 31, 1961-the latest I revision betty, November 7,1986; thence weaterlyanorthvegterly and ' CD northerly along said margin the following courses: N 89 49'09" W, a cistance of 44.72 feet; thence S 83°23'09" W, a distance.of 82.06' ON . feet; thence N 89°54'45" W, a distance of 241.66 feet to a point on a curve having a radius of 390.8 feet and having a radial bearing of S 17°05'13" W; thence northwesterly along said curve through a central f angle of 32°52'06", an arc distance of 224.19 feet; thence N 40°02'41" W . a distance of 150.00 feet; thence along a tangent curve tg the left . with a radius of 288.8 feat through a central angle of 16 1S'36", an arc. Distance of 81.96 feet; thence leaving said margin. N 14°17'27" E. a distance of 248685 feet; thence S 70 0O'00'' E, a distance of 98.00 feet; thence N 00 51'26" E. a distance of 286.24 feet thence along the westerly extension ar.d the south line of land described in lease to J Standard 0i1 Company of California dated January 21,1964. N 89°28'13" E. a distance of 159.53 feet; thence leaving said south line N 00°31'47" W. a distance of 181.18 feet to the southerly margin of Grady Way (also known as Secondary State Highway No. 1-1.) being 100 feet wide as presently ' established; thence northeasterly along said southerly margin N 77°28'26" E. • a distance of 144.07 feet to the northeast corner of land described in said lease to Standard Oil Company of California; thence S 00°31'47" E along the east line of said land, a distance of 211.12 Leer' to the south- east corner of land described in said lease; thence S 89°28'13" W along the south line -of said. a distance of 10.09 feet; thence leaving . said south line S 0I 35'52" E, a distance of 13.79 feet .to a curve having a radius of 245.00 feet and having a radial bearing of 6 89°28'18" WI thence southeasterly along said curve through a central angle of 41°11'18"; an arc distance of 176.L2 feet; thence S 4I 43'00" E, a distance of 201.41 fest to a tangent curve to the left having a radius of 245.00 feet; th.ance southeasterly along said curve t;irough a central angle of 48°Q1'02". an arc distance 205.32 feet; thence S 89°44'02" E, a distance of 111.05 (err CO the TRl F P[11NT nr fir.-y u,ur • • • • 3 i/./3 G}O,r4* • .� 4,7y 8 3 h EXHIBIT n 3 of 3 • • ll/—w 477- C' . That portion of Block 12. C.D. Hillman's Eariington Garden Addition Division No. 1 as recorded in Volume 17 of Plata, Page 74, Aecocde • W of King County, Washington, together with portions of vacated 96th 4.3 Avenue South, vacated 9tt: :-,enue South and the vacated alley between z 9th Avenue South and 9th !:».:e South, all vacated under Ordinance 2051 of the City of Renton and that portion of the northeast quarter of Section 19, Township 23 North, Range. 5 East, W.H. in King County, Washington, more particularly described as followa, • Commencing at cne northeast corner of the aouthweet quarter of said northeast quarter; thence S 01 04'08" W along the east lirse of said southwest quarter, a distance of 250.02 feet; thence N 89 44'02" k, a distance of 18.28 feat to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; thence con- tinuing N 89"44'02" W, a distance of 111.05 feat to a tangent curve W _� ; to the right having a radius of 245 feet thence northwesterly along N=� If7 said curve through a central angl=. of 48 01'02", an aro distance of 0 --Y al 205.32 feet; thence N 41°43'0a" W, ;; distance of 201.41 feet to a • • tangent curve to the right having a radius of 245 feet; thence northerly r1CQ •' CV along said curve through a central angle of 41°11'18", an arc distance CD of 176.12 feet; thence N 01°3S'52" W. a distance of 13.79 feet to. a •" ' (y point on the souct line of land described in lease to Standard 011 • ON Company of California dated January 21, 1964; thence N 89°28'13" E. along said south line. a distance of 10.09 feet to the southeast corner of said and; thence N 00°31'47" W along the east line of • said land; a distance of 2:1.12 feet co the southerly margin of • Crady play (also known as Secondary State Highway No. 1-•L) being •. 100 feet in width as prusenttg established; thence northeasterly r�; along said south margin, N 77 28'26" E. a distance of 203.55 feet to a tangent curve to cho left having a radius of 3862.71 feet; .r=uri thence along acid curve through a central angle of 11 14'08", an arc distance of 758.84 feet to a point on the west tine of land described in Exhibit "A" of Quit Claim Deed under King County Recording No. 8208270355; thence leaving said south margin of Grady Way, • S 0I8 04'08" W along said west line, a distance of 840.76 feet to • . , the worth margin of Renton Village Place as conveyed to the City 7.7 of Renton under King County Recording No. 5475310; thence N 89°44'02" W, a distance of 372.42 feet along the north margin of said Renton Village Plagge to the east margin of vacated said 96th Avenue South; thence S 01 04'08" W along said east margin. a distance of 60.01 feet to the southwest corner of said Renton Village Place; thence N 89°44'O2" U, a distance of 48.28 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BECINNINC. de EXHIBIT B ' ' Legal Description . Proposed Right of Way That portion of Lots "B" and "C". City of Renton Lot Line Adjustment No. ow-se which lies ic. :he northeast quarter of ' Section 19, Township 23 North. Range $ c..t,W.M. as shown in instrument under King County Record,.ng No. G911139006 described as follows: Commencing at thy+ northeast corner of the southwest quarter c of said norther.: quarter; thence 601'04'08"W along the east " 1-:: : ' x line of said southwest quarter, a distance of 250.02 feet; cn thence S89'44'02"E, a distance of 30.00 feet to the southwest corner of South Renton Village Place as convoyed .x A to the City of Renton under King County Auditor's File No. x = 5475310; said point being the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; ; `- } • thence N01•o4'08"E along the west line thereof, a distance 4 WI of 60.01 feet to the northwest corner thereof; thence _1►-% ( A NB9'44'02"W, a distance of 160. 16 feet to a tangent curve to `I“J % the right having a radius of 185 feet; thence northwesterly v n4 along said curve through a central angle of 40'0l'02", an % a d • CD arc distance of 155.04 feet; thence N41.43'00"W, a distance v,� > N• of 201.41 feet to a tangent curve to the right having a r; �' - 1 tT • radius of 185 feet; thence northerly along said curve ~u.i ` through a central angle of 41'11'18", an arc distance of rg o ••; .132.99 feet; thence NOO.32'28"E, a distance of 192.85 feet IL. if. to a tangent curve to the right having a radius of 55 feet; ---. thence northeasterly along said curve through a central 7 1-- a angle of 76'55'58", an arc distance of 73.85 feet to the � .:./ southerly right of way line of South Grady Way (State W Highway No. 1-L); thence 577'28'26"W along said southerly , • =7- • ri• ght of way line, a distance of 180.42 feet to a point on a c T o , curve concaved to the southwest having a radius of 55 feet; ter' a radial line of said curve through said point bearing "�. N12'31'34"W; thence southeasterly along said curve through a `': • . central angle•of 100.55'42", an arc distance of 96.88 feet; thence So1•35'52"E, a distance of 141.55 feet to an angle _ point on said Lot "C"; thence south and southeasterly along the southwesterly margin of said Lot "C" the following I . coures: S01"35'52"E, a distance of 13.79 feet to a tangent curve to the left having a radius of 245 feet; thence ci southeasterly along said curve through a central angle of i 7.7 41'11' 18", an arc distance of 176. 12 feet; thence - 3. 841'43'00"E, a distance of 201.41 feet to a tangent curve to Y the left having a radius of 245 feet; thence southeasterly along said curve through a central angle of 48'01'02", an i arc distance of 205.32 feet; thence 889'44'02"E, a distance ' 159.33 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. • 4�1 R. 014 , i WAJhi "{� e 9-1-92L..° -i *JI�' a' 86064 i • • • • • • CV . rr • • FILED for Record at Request o' vamA.t<<{.- ' F� ,Clet o 0 mitt (Aug Of . 1 .. I.1f_ C(li1CC AFTER RECORDING RETURN TO: • CAROLYN A. LAKE BOGLE& GATES PLLC Two Union Square 601 Union Street, Suite 4700 Seattle, WA 98101-2346 RESCISSION OF DECLARATION OF COVENANT THIS RESCISSION OF DECLARATION OF COVENANT ("Covenant") is made this day of , 1998,by RENTON VILLAGE ASSOCIATES ("Declarant") and rescinds that certain Covenant for future roadway dedication recorded under King County Recording No. 9210290251. RECITALS A. Declarant owns certain real property located within the Renton Village Shopping Center in the City of Renton("City"),which is legally described in Exhibit A hereto and incorporated herein by reference("Property"). B. In 1992,Declarant intended to extend an improved road to be called Lake Avenue South, and legally described on Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference ("Roadway"),through its Property in conjunction with the construction of an office building on its Property. The Covenant was recorded to implement a condition of the City's approve of Site Plan File No. SA-078-90 for future dedication of the Roadway. C. Declarant has since abandoned its office building development, and intends the Property to be sold. Any Future development on the Property will undergo independent, future review. Since Site Plan file No. SA-078-90 has been abandoned,the dedication also should be rescinded. D. Paragraph 2 of the Covenant provides that prior to completion of the dedication, this Covenant may be amended and/or terminated upon the consent of the City. 1 NOW, THEREFORE: 1. The Declarant and the City of Renton hereby rescind the Declaration of Covenant filed against the Property under King County Recording No. 9210290251, a copy of which is attached hereto. IN WITNESS WHEREOF this Covenant is executed effective upon the date first written above. RENTON VILLAGE ASSOCIATES, a Washington.general partnership By: It's General Partner Approved: City of Renton By: Its: STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) ss. COUNTY OF KING ) On this day of , 1998,before me personally appeared to me known to be a General Partner in the Partnership that executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that he was authorized to execute said instrument and that the seal affixed is the corporate seal of said corporation. IN WITNESS WHEREOF I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year first above written. (Signature) (Name legibly printed or stamped) (Seal or stamp) Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at My appointment expires 2 921U24tY251 e. • ¢xaiSIS x S of I AREAS .-rs/r �, �J'd to 3��° r'�rj'`1 �i. � POSED RIGHT OF WAY 57,860 SOFT= �/.r ` PROPOSED �41.279 SO.FT� � '�� � ��` s Se `1 LOT G-1 214.347 SQ.FT! ,,,,;'�+a%�" �-• ��� d. S'�� I l• p��LOT C-2 f/e k‘ �e e a' 'y � � r ,11 .‘ im. ....'"I'mmill- ----: . �, ors-1 /JX,+ 3.i►'.f ,9,,,,...,,..;•.#_.#---:--- 4• [ 4 6.-.....e„,..,... __.....-----vls 0.4.1. .si 4 1, 0 ..:,.tt sod • f'� y� 4. yT • JO s'. ��oo <s�w v'� LOT 4. $ ��r ~ z - LOT • c-I • �Two t "7 .74 G.' at. 1 n55 ^ e -F- LA7 a i /4 . '.eor,�..Es }a- LW-001-d8 t] ti I 3 a_ wsa-sr$4111 4 - 7 q % 2- Cd�N6R 4. ti .c Zh+rtsss•s '_ 1� :� /4- •37W71 • n Stc7,1Oer TsW�IK4 Sr• s„ ys , ll .c•._.vs r 4:2.4,7z/+l rK�•I I- 4 yOii r aol� �:sue- _ „_ - s 173 .ves ae -" - Nam ,.. e•q1�.v R Litt, 1;., hlaigo*Si _. 11 e '1 • ...ter •. • • 74 10 ' 32 X I U _ 2 x I U. i-- • EXHIBIT A 2 of 3 That portion of Hooka 11,12,14 and 15, C.D. Hillmans Earlington rarden Addition Division No. 1 as recorded is Volume 17 of Plata, . Page 74, Records of King County, Washington, together with portions of vacated 94th Avenue South, vacated 96th Avenue South, 'acated / . .• 9th Avenue .South, vacated 9th Place South. vacated 10th Avenue South and the vacated alleys between 9th Avenue South and 9th Place South and also between a Place South and 10th Avenue South, all vacated under Ordinance 20:i of the City of Renton and that portion of the northeast quarter of Section 19, town;hip 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M. in King County, Washington, more particularly described ea follows: fi Commencing at the northeast caner of the southwest quarter of said } a northeast quarter; thence S 01 04'08" Walong the east line of said ;• southwest quarter, a distance of 250.02 feet; thence N 89°44'02" W. a distance of 18.28 feet to the TRUE POINT OF 5ECiNNINO; thence ; S 61°42'59" W. a distance of 258.92 feet; thence S 00°02'16" E, : or a distant:. of 248.94 feet to the northerly margin of Primary State Highway No- 1, Jet. SSH No. 2'M to 'rt. Psh No. 2 in Renton (also I. known as State Road No. 405) as approved October 31, 1961-the latest 1 ON revision being November 7, 1986; thence westerlysnorthvegterly and kCD northerly along said margin the following courses: N 89 49'09" W, i CVa cistance of 44.?Z feet; thence S 83°23'09" W, a distance.of 82.06' ON feet; thence N 89°54'43" W. a distance of 241.66 feet to a paint on a { curve having a radius of 390.8 feet and having a radial bearing of S 17°05'13" W; thence northwesterly along said curve through a central angle of 32°52'06", an arc distance of 224.19 feet; thence N 40°02'41" W _ I a distance of 150.00 feet; thence along a tangent curve tg the left . with a radius of 288.8 feat through a central angle of 16 15'360, an arc. tiatance of 81.96 feet; thence leaving said margin. N 14 17'27" E, a distance of 248685 feet; thence S 70 00'00.: F. a distance of 98.00 feet; thence N 00 51'26" E. a distance of 286.24 feet thence along the westerly .xt•ntion a:.d the mouth line of land described in lease to ! Standard 0i1 Company of California dated January 21,1964. N 89°28'13" E. a distance of 159.53 feet; thence leaving said south lino k 00°31'47" W. I a distance of 1181.18 feet to the southerly margin of Grady Way (also known as Secondary State Highway No. 1—L) being 100 feet wide as presently ' i established; thence northeasterly along said southerly margin N 77°2a,26" E, a distance of 144.07 feet to the northeast corner of land described in said lease to Standard Oil Company of California; thence S 00°31'47" E i along the east line of said land, a distance of 211.12 feet' to the south— east corner Of land described in said lease; thence S 89°28'13" W along the south line .of said, a distance of 10.09 feet; thence leaving • said south line S 01°35'52" E, a distance of 13.79 f■etito a curve having a radius of 245.00 feet and having a radial bearing of 6 89°28'18" WI thence southeasterly along said curve through s central angle of 41°1l'18 an arc distance of 176.12 feet; thence S 4I 43'00" E, a distance of 201.41 feet to a tangent curve to the left haying a radius of 245.00 feet; chance southeasterly along said curve L;trough a central angle of 48°01'02". an arc distance 205.32 feet; thence S 89°44'02" E, a distance of 111.05 fee[ CO Ch,s TRIP POIN-t AC Ur.-rwu,ur • 3 lt/ od6. C- 5'+ g S. EXHIBIT A of 3 ..0-114 -lot" 7.4'40 7- a7 ...,....._• That portion of Block 12. C.D. Hillman's Eariington Garden Addition Division Ho. 1 as recorded in Volume i7 of Plata, Page 74, Racoxd4 W of King County, Washington, together with portion4 of vacated 96th Avenue Sot th, vacated 9tf. :venue South and the vacated alley between 9th Avenue South and 9th 1:..ce South, all vacated under Ordinance 2051 :?-.1 of the City of Renton and that portion of the northeast quarter of • Section 19, Township 23 North, Range 5. East, W.H. in King County, Washing_on. more particularly described as follows, . I Commencing at cne northeast coiner of the southwest quarter of said cc northeast quarter; thence 5 01 04'08" W along the east lime of fluid � . southwest quarter. a distance of 250.02 feet; thence N 89 44'a2" W, . z • a distance of 18.28 feat to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; thence can- ' J VI tinuing N 89 44'02" W, a distance of 111.05 feet to a tangent curve W•I to the right having a radius of 245 feet; thence northeasterly along N=-5 • It) said curve through a central angl-. of 48 01'02", anarc distance of _ .,, 4 205.32 feet; thence N 41°43'00" W, distance of 201.41 feet to a • ►r • '� tangent curve to the right having a radius of 245 feet; thence northerly . c Q •: CV along said curve through a central angle of 41°11'18", an arc distance, u• CD of 176.12 feet; thence N 01°35'52" W, a distance of 13.79 feet to a r -- •"'- ' ( I point on the scut; line of land described, in lease to Staad.ara Oil t7` Company of California dated January 21, 1964; thence N 89°28'13" E. along said south line, a distance of 10.09 feet to the southeast `",,, corner of said and; thence N 00°31'47" w along the vast line of a : said land; a distance of 211.12 feet co the southerly margin of , f I Crafty ',Jay (413o known as Secondary State Highway No. 1-L) being )-• 100 feet in width as presentlg established; thence northeasterly r�i along said South margin, N 77 28'26" E. a distance of 203.55 feet to a tangent curve to the left having a radius of 386$ 71 feet; T: es- thence along said curve through a central angle of 11 14'08", an arc distance of 758.84 feet to a point on the vest line of land • described in Exhibit "A" of Quit Claim Used under King County Recording .. • No. 88208270355; thence leaving said south margin of Grady Way, • S U1 04'08" N along said west line, a distance of 840.76 feet to .. the north margin of Renton Village Place as conveyed to the City of Renton under King County Recording No. 5475310; thence N 89°44'02" W, -- ' a distance of 372.42 feet along the north margin of said Renton A Village Plane to the *ear. margin of vacated said 96th Avenue South; thence S 01 04'08" W along said east margin, a distance of 60.01 feet to the eouthweat corner of said Renton Village Place; thence N 89°44'02" W, a distance of 48.28 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. • as • EXHIBIT U ' Legal Description Proposed Right of•Way That portion of Lots "B" and "C". City of Renton Lot Line Adjustment No_ 001-88 which lies it. :he northeast quarter of Section 19, Township 23 North. Range 5 c.st,W.M. as shown in instrument under King County Recording No. 8911139006 described as follows: • W . 2 Commencing at th northeast corner of the southwest quarter eD se of said northea'.: quarter; thence S01°04'08"W along the east line of said southwest quarter, a distance of 250.02 feet; cn thence S89'44'02"E, a distance of 30.00 feet to the 1- • southwest corner of South Renton Village Place as conveyed • .xx Ato the City of Renton under King County Auditor's File No. m 5475310; said point being the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; ; _ thence N01'04'08"E along the west line thereof, a distance ' Wl17 of 60.01 feet to the northwest corner thereof; thence • _Ir-- , CV N89'44'02"W, a distance of 160. 16 feet to a tangent curve to "‘ . the right having a radius of 185 feet; thence northwesterly W C..) Y g along said curve through a central angle of 48'01'02", an •t d • arc distance of 155.04 feet; thence N41.43'00"W, a distance < o el N of 201.41 feet to a tangent curve to the right having a �'t %► t7-. radius of 185 feet; thence northerly along said curve s- • - : through a central an le of 41'11'18"¢ , an arc distance of ex Q • '132.99 feet; thence N0O•32'28"E, a distance of 192.85 feet " li ›— to a tangent curve to the right having a radius of 55 feet; i thence northeasterly along said curve through a central 1 I- angle of 76'55'58", an arc distance of 73_85 feet to the . i southerly right of way line of South Grady Way (State 4 W Highway No. 1-L); thence S77'28'26"W along said southerly z right of way line, a distance of 180.42 feet to a point on a 1 7.=,• curve concaved to the southwest having a radius of 55 feet; s a radial line of said curve through said point bearing �: N12'31'34"W; thence southeasterly along said curve through a • = 1 • central angle,of 100'55'42", an arc distance of 96-88 feet; ' �:� : thence Sot 5'52"E, a distance of 141.55 feet to an angle . • point on Said Lot "C"; thence south and southeasterly along • the southeasterly margin of said Lot "C" the following I , coures; SO1'35'52"E, a distance of 13.79 feet to a tangent curve to the lef-t havino a radius of 245 feet; thence .1 southeasterly along said curve through a central angle of i 7.7 _ 41'11' 18", an arc distance of 176. 12 feet; thence• i S41.43'00"E, a distance of 201.41 feet to a tangent curve to Y the left having a radius of 245 feet; thence southeasterly along said curve through a central angle of 48'01'02", an arc distance of 205.32 feet; thence 889'44'02"E, a distance 159-33 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. sty I. Nis ) wof WAt 41 9-1-92 , r *4 86064 , c • i dr N S • FILED for Record at Request c►' kiame t { 4.. j<. Hitt� �� i(( �K �++r. • I!r . a . [GdCI NOV-11-98 23:06 From:Boale&Gates PLLC 2069222711 T-700 P.02 Job-083 CITY OF RENTON BOGLE&GATES NOV 1 7 1998 A Professional Litnhed Liability Company RECEIVED LAW OFFICES Tacoma Financial Center CITY CLERK'S OFF4 oragc 1145 Broadway Plaza Bellevue CAROLYN A.LAKE Suite 1360 Portland Tacoma,Washington 95402-3502 Seattle Vancouver,B.C. Direct Dial: 593-4961 Main Office: (253)922-8446 Facsimile: (253)922-2711 Internet Email: clake@bogle.com 09197/12059 November 11, 1998 Fax 8i Mail Mike Katterman Planning Division Manager City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton,WA 98055 Re: Recession of Declaration for Road Improvements;Renton Village Associates Dear Mr.Kattermann: We represent potential purchasers of property located within the Renton Village Shopping Center in the City of Renton("Property"). We write to confirm that a Declaration of Covenant recorded against the subject property has been rescinded,or if not yet rescinded,we enclose the suitable rescission document for the City's approval and execution. Rescission is appropriate as discussed below. The Declaration of Covenant was issued in 1992 by Renton Village Associates as a condition of Rentan's approval of Site Plan File No, SA-078-90. The City's approval authorized development of an office building. We understand that development of the office building has since been abandoned by the Property owner, and no doubt the City considers the 1992 permit approvals lapsed. Since the office development will not occur,the Covenant should be removed as an encumbrance against the Property. Any future development on this site will undergo its own,unique review and approval process. Our client's pending purchase is contingent upon this rescission, We look forward to receiving • the City's consent as soon as possible,and please call me directly if you have any questions. Due to pending deadlines,we will follow up this fax with a phone call to the City tomorrow,Thursday, November 12, 1998. Thank you. Sincerely, &GATES P,T.,.L.C. Ca olyn A.Lake Enclosure(s) NOV-11-98 23:06 From:Boale&Gates PLLC 2069222711 T-700 P.03 Job-083 AFTER RECORDING RETURN TO: CAROLYN A. LAKE BOGLE&GATES PLLC Two Union Square 601 Union Street, Suite 4700 Seattle. WA 98101-2346 RESCISSION OF DECLARATION OF COVENANT THIS RESCISSION OF DECLARATION OF COVENANT("Covenant")is made this day of . 1998,by RENTON VILLAGE ASSOCIATES ("Declarant") and rescinds that certain Covenant for future roadway dedication recorded under King County Recording No. 9210290251, RECITALS A. Declarant owns certain real property located within the Renton Village Shopping Center in the City of Renton("City"), which is legally described in Exhibit A hereto and incorporated herein by reference("Property"). B. In 1992,Declarant intended to extend an improved road to be called Lake Avenue South, and legally described on Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference("Roadway"),through its Property in conjunction with the construction of an office building on its Property. The Covenant was recorded to implement a condition of the City's approve of Site Plan File No. SA-078-90 for future dedication of the Roadway. C. Declarant has since abandoned its office building development, and intends the Property to be sold. Any Future development on the Property will undergo independent,future review. Since Site Plan file No. SA-078-90 has been abandoned,the dedication also should be rescinded. D. Paragraph 2 of the Covenant provides that prior to completion of the dedication, this Covenant may be amended and/or terminated upon the consent of the City. 1 NOV-11-98 23:07 From:Bogle&Gates PLLC 2069222711 T-700 P.04/16 Job-083 / NOW,THEREFORE: 1. The Declarant and the City of Renton hereby rescind the Declaration of Covenant filed against the Property under King County Recording No. 9210290251,a copy of which is attached hereto. IN WITNESS WHEREOF this Covenant is executed effective upon the date first written above. RENTON VILLAGE ASSOCIATES, a Washington general partnership By: It's General Partner Approved: City of Renton By: Its: STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ss. COUNTY OF KING ) On this day of , 1998,before me personally appeared to me known to be a General Partner in the Partnership that executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation,for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that he was authorized to execute said instrument and that the seal affixed is the corporate seal of said corporation. IN WITNESS WHEREOF I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year first above.written. (Signature) (Name legibly printed or stamped) (Seal or stamp) Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at My appointment expires 2 NOV-11-98 23:07 From:Boale&Gates PLLC 2069222711 T-700 P.05/16 Job-083 • X • n i Sr; Ai ,r "^� 1 , ` to --- h I ' . . rot- ......- g A rd• - - .. . \ lo a . F" ' - ' l,. 111 .\ 1........v...........-...:50 ,..._..... .... . 1111 T ".. i lit, zit r . Y t A \LI 11 ZFL V J..1 ..•.ON � 1 Pt �g \-: in . k ' , kil . 1. . i lk nim el "‘ 't•vit za 11 44d,, .r. iv. t a? : 1 \4":11,a. It Ks .A., '4/* e ' M it i 8 1 ''i §\ %. la 446 6. • •' •1i1 • NI I - • .r,v. - llitt i, MAN 'i' • • �J• got Inv A, ,- ..itot. Iklio.1,;., ..... . : ,.1 N % .. 1 t 'el': OM 00,00. a \‘ ‘114- It g 01 Illr Pio Z Ikleit‘, T.. • (--T i - . - swim .,,- ,-:.1W', a*: ... I. a ac % \ ti ri?? h��' + . • NOV-11-98 23:07 From:Bogle&Gates PLLC 2069222711 T-700 P.06/16 Job-083 EXt1'1BIT A 2 of 3 • That patrtian of Blocks 11.12,14 And 15. C.0, IL1)zans lariingtop 4 Barden Addition Divialon Mo. 1 as recorded In Values 17 of Plata. . Page 74, Accords of ring County, Washington. together with portions • of vacated 94ch avenue South, vacated 94th Avenue South, saaated • 9th Avinuo .Sowth, vacated 9th Place South, Vacated 10th AVenu• South i and the vacates attars sandmen 9th AV•nue South and Oth PlaCs South and also betve.an v Place South and 10th Avoqu• Sautn. all vacated unusr Ordinance 2O�& of the City of Renton and that portion of thr ' northeast quarter of Section 19, town3Alp 23 North, Range 3 Eau, U.H. to hangs Coensy, Washington. mere pactiau$arly deaoribia as follousa i t' Commencing at the northeast corner of the southwaat quarter of Said 1 northeast quarter: thanes S 01 04'08'" Y along the cut line of said boutfiast quarter. a Riatancr of 250.02 fast; thence N 09 44'p2" W, 4 diatanc■ of 18,28 test to the TRUE Pouts 01 8t fl(IOO; thence , Lel S 61g42'59" W. a diatau.ce of 258.92 feat: gnawS 00 02'14°' E. a distance of 248.94 feet to the northerly margin of Primary State ;v Highway No_ 1, Jet. SSA No. Z-M to =n•. Pah No. 2 in Renton (also /. known as State Road No. 40S) as approved October 31, 1961.-tho latest cy revision pains November 7. 1996: thence weater1yanorthwegterly and 1 O northerly along said margin the fallowing courses; N 49 49'09" W, Rl a cis canes Of 44.02 Coat; thanes S 113o43'09" W, a d2dtante•of 82.06' or, feet; thence N 89 54'45o W, a distance of 241.66 feet to a point on a { curve having a radius of 39Q.8 feet and :laving a radial Dearing of t S 17 05'13" W; chance northwesterly along said cur'. through a central anal• of 320S2106", en are distance of 224.19 fees; them:, $ 40002'4l" hi a distance of 150.00 feet; chance along a tangent curve ail the loft with a radius of 288.8 feat through a central angle of 16 15'36'•, 0 an arc ciastanc• of 81.94 feet; thence �eaving said margin, N 14 1)''27" E. a 4istanc. of 248 85 feet; thence S 70 00'00': S. a dlatano• of 98.00 feet; thence N 0aa51'26'• E, a distance of 286.24 feat thence along the westerly 'retention a:.d the south line of land described in leap to Standard Oil Company of California dated January 21,1964. N 89 28'13" E. a distance of 159.53 feet: thence leaving said south lino 1tf 00°31'47" W. • a distance of 181,18 feet to the southerly margin of Grady Way (also . known as Secondary State Alghway No. 1-1.) Wing 100 fest WAS ae pr'ai.ptly ' estabtish•dr thence aouth•aiterly along said southerly margin U 77 28'26" E. a distance of 144.07 feet to th■ northeast corner of land described in vain lease to Stan4ar4 Oil Company of CalifornIaa theaee S 00e31'4+7" E i along the •oat line of said land. a distance of 211.12 fest' to the Mouth • - east corner of largo aeisctit>rd in 101a lease; chant• S 89°38'13" Y along 'th• South line of said, a distance of 10.09 feet; thence leaving said south. lire S O036'SZ" E, a oieva ce of 13.79 fast ,FO a cusve halting a radius of 143.00 fast and having a radial curing 4f 6 avails" Wi thence soutnrascarly along said curve through a central angle of 41A11'18": an arc distance of 176.1.2 feet: chance S 4i 43'g0" E, a distance of 201.41 feat to ■ CLnganc curve to Chu left having a radius Of 265.00 feat; th,.gce saucnsasceriy along said curve t;lraugh a central anglo of 481301'01", an arc distance 205.32 fast; Chance S 19044'02" E. a 4lotenco of 111.05 Pert to trim TRI 1' Pniwt ANr Gr.-wwwfwo NOV-11-98 23:07 From:Boale&Gates PLLC 2069222711 T-700 P.07/16 Job-083 • • 3f it/5 28,0i • • h - 83► L . }. -• �r • EXHIBIT A 3 of 3 • / " Y�w 1oT' c,. . That portion of 81ock U. C.D. Niilasan's Earlifgton Carden Addition Division No. 1 as recor0e4 in Volume L7 of Plats, Page 74, lacatdi of king County, Washington. together with portions of vacated 96th Avenue South, vacated 9t•L :'venue South and the vacated alley between z9sh A South and 9th ! -s South, all vacated under Ordinance 2051 4.1 of the city of Renton and that portlon of the northeast quarter of Section 19. Township 23 North. Range S Fast, V.y_ in king County, Washington, more particularly described as follows, Commencing at 'cm northeast coiner of the southwest quarter of said northeast quarter; thence $ 01 04'08" W along the ease Use of said • southwest quarter. a dlatante of 250.02 feet: thence N 89 ea'02" W, z a distance of 18.20 fest to the TRUE POINT OF 5ECINNINC; thence Gan- I_inuing N 89 44'02" V, a 4istanCe of L11.05 feet to a tangent curve w� _ to the right having a radius of 243 feet-6 therms oorthwsstsrly al'Ong N Ll) said curve through a central aogl . of 48 01'02', an are distance of P N 205.32 feet: thence N 41°1.3'00" W, distance of 201. el fear to a - to.- - T tangent curve to the right having a radius of 245 feet; thence northerly • • N along said curve through a central angle of 41°11°18", au arc diecauce '. CD of 1711.12 [get; thence N 01°3S'52" b, a distance of 13.79 feet to a 0- • N point on the soutr line of land described in lsaae to Staudarti Oil 7.rf-, a LT Company of C..lifoFnia dated January 21,. 1964; Manny N a9°2a'13" E. along said south line. a distant' o: 10.09 feet to trip southwest corner of span '.ends thence a 00 31'0" W along she vials line of said land; a dL_cance of 211.12 feet to the southerly margin of g CCady Way (also known as Secondary State Highway Nq. 1'4L) being 100 feet in width at presentq established; thence northeasterly 4 along maid south margin. N 77 28'26" E. a dtatanes of 203.55 feet .' to a tangent curve to the left having a radius of 3868.71 feet: i-- • thence along said curve through a central angle of 11 14'08". an :- . • arc distance of 758.84 feet to a point on the vest line of land described in Exhibit "A'' of Quit Claim Deed under king County Keeordlog No. 8204270353; thence leaving said south margin of Grady Way, S 01 0a'08" w along said Moat line, a distsnc. of 840.70 feet to the north margin of Renton Village Place is donv.yed to see Cgcy of Renton undor King County Recording Mo. S675310, thence ,N 89o44'02" V. a distance of 372.44 feet along the north margin of eau; Kenton village Place to the east margin of vacated said 96th Avenue South; tnencs 3 01 0v•08'• w along sato was; margin, a aaszencs of 00.01 feet to the southwest corner of said Renton Village Place; thence N 89°0e'0.Z" F1, a distance of 46.28 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BE NNZ;+C. • NOV-11-98 23:08 From:Boole&Gates PLLC 2089222711 T-T00 P.08/18 Job-083 , • EXHIBIT T 73 . • ' Legal Description • Preeesne Right of 'Wav That portion of Lots "en and "C". City of Renton Let Line Adjustment No. 001-88 which lies it. .•he northeast quarter of Section i9. Township 23 North. Range b F:st•W.>h- as shown in instrument under King County Recording No. 8911/39006 • . described a% follows: / Commencing at the. northeast corner of the siouthweet quarter ;-- of said northea .: quarter; thence 301°04'08"W along the east x line of said southwest quarter, a alstance of 25O.QZ foot; , thence 3O9'44'02"E, a distance of 30.00 feet to the southwest corner of 'South Renton Village Place as conveyed • ,1 to the City of Renton under King County Auditor'% rile No. s c. et s 5475310; said point being the TRUE POINT OF 5EGINNINO; ; `' tthence NOt'o4'08"E along the west line thereof, a distance ' • a 611 of 60.01 feet to the northwest corner thereof; thence ; VW N89.44'02"W, a distance of 160. 16 feet to a tangent curve to .., the right having a radius of 105 feet; thence northwesterly ,i"n ., along said curve through a central angle of 48'O1.'02`, an CD arc distance of 155.04 feet; thence N41.43'0O"%d, a distance < v, N of 201.41' feet to a tangent curve to the right having a `.y W s -+ v+ radius of 185 feet; thence northerly along said curve Y'' through a central anple of 41-11'19", an arc distance of oz oj: •132.99 feet; thence Noo"32'28"E, a distance of 192.85 feet � ' to a tangent curve to the right boring o radius of 55 feet; �# thence northeasterly along said curve th►ouoh a central angle of 76'S5'5O", an arc distance of 73.85 feet to the a :� southerly right of way line of South Grady Way (State w Highway No. t-L); thence 577'2D'26"U alone said southerly W5''' right of way line, a distance of ;80.42 feet to a point on a E X a . curve concaved to the southwest havino a radius of 55 feet; �'" a radial line of said curve through said point bearing -I.. N12'31'34'la; thence southeasterly along said curve through a LE . central angle,of 100'55'42"s an arc distance of 96.88 feet; ... � thence S01'35'52'8, a distances of 141.55 feet to an angle point on said Lot `C"; thence south and +southeasterly along the southwesterly margin of said Lot "C" the following s courwsr 501'35'32"E, a Distance of i3.79 foot to a tangent ; curve to the loft having a radius of 245 feet; thence c. - southeasterly along said curve through a central angle of 1 41611' 10", an arc distance of 176.12 feet; thence 841'43000"S, a distance of 201_41 feet to a tangent curve to '1 the left having a radius of 245 feet;; thence southeasterly 4 ' along said curve through a central angle of 40"01'02", an arc distance of 205.32 feet; thence SO9644'021%, a di%tarce i59-33 feet to the TRUE POINT OF 8E$INNYNG. I4t a litho 44►�Ely% a' 1 0 9-1-92 * ,w ry 044�a4 1 qp NOV-11-99 23:09 From:Bogle&Gates PLLC 2069222711 T-700 P.09/16 Job-093 • • 1 • •N 0 N Q N • - i • FILED for Record at Request o' ago 44(6 L' ) t Ll�S4 • NOV-11-98 23:09 From:Boale&Gates PLLC 2069222711 T-700 P.10/16 Job-083 i I. . 92/Oo?9490 7 f , e I Sk-078-90 g H , I II 'PHI DECi�1RATZos Op CpyttiaMIT ("Covenant"`) 'is INOtia this a)s`'..r I1 day at Qe its F_!, , 199Z. by Rgl�Tpa 'VUiME amSOCib (•pgcterent ) for ature roadway dedication. A. Declarant owns certain real property 1oCated within the 11 Renton Village Shopping Center in the City of Renton ('City), which is legally described in Gehl__ bit a hereto and incorporated 5 . herein by reference ('Pzoperty!a '• R. Declarant intends to eaten an ieprcved roan to be �— + • called yaks Avenue South, and legal'iy described on �!hibit S a -- attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference U/ ('Roadway■), through its Property in conjunction with the cpnetruotiun of an office building on its Property_ ?Sala Covenant is recorded to ispiasent a condition of the City'a a cite Sari Pile Mo. SA-oia-so for future dedication of Roadway• cry .. _..._ ON NAM, therefore, D•:lsrant hereby declares, cenveyn and . establishes the following covenants X. obligOi n to Dedicate Road RJght-pjlWaV., Declarant . hereby covenants and agrees to dedicate to the city the right-at- . way and improvements constituting the Roadway to the City to be saes and maintained as a public etraet upon a requaet by the • City. . ! 2. Coyenant to B t,yj tJ L n he This CQv. I_".. : a . �.1 • wit .1 : l� and - , binds • u' ' • 1 _ . .. �' -,.11 • �11 4 ria74;4x.,..:.xr :� fix-ra,14:1ClirnrlTwrrc., , von dedication, a ovarian shall testy na a automat cally v -ut any further action by Declarant or any other party. Prior to completion of such dedication, thin covenant may be amended and/or terminated only upon the express consent of the City. r • NOV-11-98 23:09 From:Boale&Gates PLLC 2069222711 T-700 P.11/16 Job-083 • , . IN WITNESS VREREO?, this Covenant is executed effective upon . . the data first spew written. MEIITON VILLACIc ASSOCIATES.•a Washington general partnership • c .w ay Its oe•era)Pa nor Exhibit A - Leger Description of Property Expibit a - Legal Description of Raid Right-of-Way 5 x STATE OF WASEIWGTOs ) se. i _ cowrTY or LX$G on this t Ss day Of C Z& , ma. before Ire, a Notary Public sand for the State of iashington, personally appeared Jp s`rjtE Ilp (i personally known to se for proved to se On tie basis or� sae eta rosy evidence) to be the person who o executed this instrument, an oath stated that Si was authorised to execute the instrument, and acknowledged it as the 1. General Partner of RENTOR VILLAGE ASSOCIATES to be ee true and an 10. voluntary act and dead of said corporation for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument, IN WITNESS WNBRE0F, I nava hereunto set my hand' and official seal the day and year first above written. g lk NOT AY PUS= in and for the ptdte eera**41Ik of Itashinc�ton, ress141ng at %at) NY appointsont expires /e-I� s,it to 0 921iT19DQ3 o' . EXHIBIT - �� � �, pS f��/� ie, ` \k. 03 97.8&0 SOFTY `,.� """" RIG141 OF WAY 341278 SO.FTA F .,.a,.. :.00., �� y 7 LOT G-1 214,367 SC.FT- /..). o r qw ‘5•01-e, il°1 1 ? !i' " 4 . I i , go tt: t -,:„._ °0 <F, I.7✓' + in spy��•� L `. 10:.�p 1(-7l • Mar •�,• [mot . i i"0'~ low �s % _ r ' -rep�.»ar '' i u.-001-68 ; aiii . .., -12" mcri ..... "...,arrnetr,*a' Ifill•- IP •- atilF % OM PISPOR 3 ,.. . N` 1i _ ... L 0' .rA117r Qa A .4 � C liaM0.1151 ly ��'� tys/rpR/ KmLRtTir Q ? o Ai -*g.:063: " '41 . 4. r \ g - V.,c1 1.0 1 4, �.� - - ��� � as tr i • NOV-11-98 23:09 From:Boale&Gates PLLC 2069222711 T-700 P.13/16 Job-083 w . EXHIBIT A.2 of 3 , .4Er"45.47 L 447,0".1-44v,tes/digs,ewi dvS 0. /1/ .1✓ ;Lo�-' ; That portion of Stocks 11,12,14 and 13, C.Q. Hillmans Earlingtop Carder Addition Divia,ion Ho. 1 as recorded ill Yoiume 17 of Tits, . Page 74. Records of Ming County, Washingt°n, together with portions of vacated 9.ch evonlie south, vacates 94th Avenue south, Waged 9th Avenuo_Souch. vacated 9th Place South. vacated 10th Avenue South and the vacaren alleys between 9tn Avenue South and 9th Place $push and also between v. Place South and 10th Avenue Soots, all vacated under Ordinaneir MI' of the City of Renton and that portion of the northeast quarter of Section 19, Township 23 North. Boner 5 Easi. W.M. in ring County. Washington. sore particularly described as folLowss - - ' is Commencing at the northeast coiner of the southwest quarter of saL4 northeast quarter; thence $ 0L 04'080' w along the east line of said soutnrist quarter, a distance of 250.02 feet; thence N 89 44'Q2" WI a distance of 18.IB twee to the TIWE POINT OF 1EG )flINHi thence , S 61942'59" V. a dtsta,.ce of 258.92 feet; thongs S 00904'16" E, Ul 4 distance of 248.94 feet to the northerly margin of Primary State t•J Highway No. 1, Jct. SSH No. Z-$ to :ne. Psh No. 2 in Renton (also 1. • 3 known as State Road No. 405) as approved October 31, 1961-the latest revision being November 7,1986; thence wescerLyanorthreAterly and O northerly slang said margin the folloging cQUrresr N 89 49'09" W, a clstance of k6.a2 feet; Chance 5 83 73'09" W, a dietance•or 8Z.06' { a7., , feet; Chance N 89 Ss'iS" W, a distaste of 261.66 feet to a point on a curve naming a radius of 390.8 feet and having a radial bearing of ; 5 17°05'U" u; thence northwesterly along said curve thtough a s~entral angle of 32°S2'06", an arc distance of 224.19 feet; thence N 4002'41" W a distance of 150.00 feet; thence along a tangent curve tg the left . with a raaiu,c of 288.a r•.t through a central angle of 16 15'36". an arc eiotance of 81.96 feet; thence leaving 'said margin. N 14o17'27" E, a distance of 248b85 feet; thence S 70 00'00" F. a distance of 98.00 feet; thence N 0� 51'26" E, a disilincs of 286.24 feet thence along the westerly estention sled the south line of land described in lease to Standard Oil Company of California dated January 21,1964. N 89928'13" E. a distapc. of 159.S3 feet; thence leaving Said south Line N 00°3147" ii, a distance of 181.18 feet to the southerly mat;ia of Grady Way (also ; known ss Secondary State Highway No, 1, .) being ZOO feet wide as presently e stablished; thence northeasterly alone solid southerly margin N 77°Z8'26" E. ; . a distance of 144.07 feet to the northeast corner at land described In said lease to St are oil Company at Calitornia; thence S 00931'47" E y along the east line of said land, a distance of Z11.12 feet. to the uostth- . sad' corner of lane 4.earlb.d in acid Leese; thence 5 09°28'13" V . along the south line of said, a dletance of 10.09 feet; thence leaving •aid south line 5 Oi°35'52s E. a distance of 13.79 feet .to a. curve having a radius of 245.00 feet and having a radial bearing of 6 89°48018h Wi mince soutttsaicerly alone said curve through s central ajiw ut 41°11.18": an arc distance of 176.12 feet; thence S 41 43'00" E, a distance of 201.41 feet to a tangent curve to the lett having a radius of 265.00 feet; thence southeasterly along said curve t;trough s central angle of 48°01'02 an arc distance 205.32 feet; thence S 89°44'02" E. a distance of 111.05 fern to Chi' !pi 1' mull' nr ar.•.vw.w• NOV-11-98 23:09 From:Bosle&Gates PLLC 2069222711 T-700 P.14/16 Job-083 d. ; . //.l5 oo� 11;4:- S3,. EXHIBIT n 3 of 3 WJ /Y�yvLvr �' ' That portion of Block 12, C.D. Hillman's lEarltngcon Garden addition Lh viAion Ho• 1 43 rseorve4 in Volume 17 of Plats, Page 741 Rscardi of Ming County. Washington. together with pottipna of vacated 94th �- Avenue South, vacated 9ti :winos South and the vacated alley be we 9th Avenue South And 9th V:.,ae South, all vacated under ordinance 2051 H of the City of Renton and tha: portion of the northeast quarter of $ Section 19. Township 23 porch, Range 5 East, W.H. in King Cogs't71 .111.1.'\. 1: Wasnint un, more particularly describgd ON fetlWLret x ComrtafCint at rho northeast corner of the southves[ quarter of said cs northeast quarter; thonoe S 01 04'08" M along the scat life of Said w . southeast quarter. s distance of 250.02 feet; thence N 89 44'02" V, = ' a 4ista4ee of 18.28 teat to the TRUE POINT Of BEGINNING; thence can- N ringing H 99 a4'02" W. a distance et 111.02 fast to a taant cure ▪ 1.-1 _ to the right having a radius of 245 feet Enemavortfveetecly along _i a in said curve through a central angl;• of 48 01'02", an arc Costume of M cV 205.32 Coot; thence N 414343'00" 4, = distance of 201.41 feet to a • L.+.r ' '0, tangent curve so Om right having a radius of 14S foot; thnnee northerly al o N along said curve through a central angle of 41 11.18", an are Qistaaco • 2I. Cp of 176.12 r..cu cnsnee N 0035'52" N. a diatanee of 13.79 lime to S. " N point on the sour; lino of land doscrLDed in lease to Standees 0i1 ' 44 Company of California dated January I1. 1964; thence N 89°28'13" E. 7-3 along said south line. a distance of 10.09 feet to thr aoutheaat ",� Corner of said and; thence N 00031'47" W along the was; line of i r said land; a d...tance of Z11.12 feet to the southerly margin of s'e0 Grady fay (also known as Secondary State Highway No. 1-L) being f~ 100 feet in width as prassntl ► astanllshed; thence northeasterly A 1along said South margin, $ 77 28'26" E. a. distance of 203.55 foot • to a tangent curve to the Left having a radius of 3861.71 fees; :r.- thence along said curve through a central angle of 11 14'08", an I . r arc distance of 758.84 foot to a point on chi vest line of land 4e a rtt•4i in Exhibit "Al" of quit Claim D.sd under King County Recording f No. 2208270355; thence leaving said south margin of Grady Way, S 01 04'08' W along said west line, a distance of 840.76 feet to ' U. trim worth mergln of Tinton vsllap. Place a. eemv.yod to the MAY • of Renton under King County R.eoratn8 No. 5475310; thence N 89044'02n W, a discamoi of 372,41 foot along the north margin of said ReACoo Village) Place to the fast. oar4Ln of vacated said 96th Avenue South; thence S 01 04'oe'• V along said east margin. a distance of 60.01 feet to the southwest cornet of said Renton Village Place; thence N a9o:4'02" W. a distance of 48.28 fiat to the TRUE POINT OF SECIMNINC. NOV-11-98 23:10 From:Boile&Gates PLLC 2069222T11 T-T00 P.15/16 Job-083 eb • EXHIBIT B Leoal Description P►opgtQd R1dnt of'Way That portion of Lots "0' and '0'. City of Renton Lot Line Ad,iustment No- 001-48 which lies it. .4ne northeast quarter of Section 19. Tounsh ie 23 North. Range g e.5t,W.M. as shown in instrument under King County Pecoroi.ng No. 8911139006 described 4% follouss W v Commencing at the northeast corner of the southwest quarter of said northea'.; quarter; thence S01'04'08"W along the east line of said southwest quarter, a distance of 250.OZ feet; . gm thence S89'44002•E. a distance of 30.00 feet to the r southwest cor;ler of South Renton Village Place as conveyed .,� •I to the City of Renton under Kinq County Auditor's rile No_ = 5475310; said point being the TRUE POINT OF RRRINNINGI 3 `" 1thence NO1'04'08"E along the vest line thereof. a distance a t y W) of 50.01 feet to the nartewgot corner thereof' thence t'i N09'44'o2'W, a distance of 160. 16 feet to a tangent curve to g *. R the right having a radium of 185 feat; thence northwesterly VIalong said curve through a central angle of 413'01'02'. an • .4 Sv CDarc distance of 155.04 feet; thence N41'43'00"W, a distance s In of 201.41 feet to a tangent curve to the right having a e'E _ 1 ON radius of 185 feet; thence northerly along said curve rq i ~' x through a central angle of 41'11'ZB", en arc distance of 'i egof '132.99 feet; thence NOO"32'20"E, a distance of 192.85 feet i � ! to a tangent curve tO the rlant having a radius of 65 feet; �'"' thence northeasterly along said curve through a central 1 angle of 7b'33'36', an arc distance of 73.e5 fgvt to the 3 = r,., southerly right of way lino of South Grady Way (State w Highway No. i-L); thence S77'20'26"W alone said southerly I- right of way line, a distance of 180.42 feet to a point on a p ct4rvo concaved to the southwest having a radius of 55 feet; a radial line of said curve through said point bearing tea-. Ni2•31'34'W: thence southeasterly along Said curve through a t•,'' central angle•of 1O0655'42", an arc distance of 9b_ee met; '� thence 902'35'52'E, a distance of 141.55 feet to an angle • point on uaid Lot SC"; thence south and southeasterly along the southwesterly margin Of said Lot 'C" the following 9 couresu 801'35'52"E, a distance of 13.79 feet to a tangent i curve to the left having a radius of 244 feet; thence *CI southeasterly along saip curve through a central angle of 1 41'11" i8", an arc distance of 1y6.12 feet; thence i 541'43'00"E, a distance of 201.41 feet to a tangent curve to the left having a radius of 245 feet; thence southeasterly S along said curve through a central angle of 40'01002`, an arc distance of 205.32 feet; thence Se9'44'O2"Er a distance 159.23 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. 034/0 1144 Iv i lig 4,fr.N 96064 a 9-1-92 nii NOV-11-98 23:10 From:Boale&Oates PLLC 2069222711 T-700 P.16/16 Job-083 • dal • •• • • • • J EN - 1 • tir FILED for Record at Request o' • . r I G'V Or • I. 1.11. e ' cC • •• CI Y OF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works Department Earl Clymer, Mayor Lynn Guttmann,Administrator July 12, 1993 Mr. Charlie McKee McKee and Shalka 10800 NE 8th Street#802 Bellevue, WA 98004 Dear Mr. McKee: I am writing in response to your inquiry regarding the expiration date for the Site Plan approval and Conditional Use permit fora ten story office/retail sales building at Renton Village. The Hearing Examiner's originally approved the site plan on March 5, 1991. The City Council approved the Conditional Use Permit on June 17, 1991. These initial approvals were good for two years, and would have expired March 5, 1993, and June 17, 1993, respectively. In January 1993, Renton Village Associates requested an extension for the Site Plan approval and Conditional Use Permit. The Hearing Examiner granted a one year extension for these permits. This extension moves the expiration date of the Site Approval to March 5, 1994, and the Conditional Use Permit to June 17, 1994. Sincerely, . 6.tx Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator • F 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 90 -fig' - % ter: CI(*) OF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works Department Earl Clymer, Mayor Lynn Guttmann,Administrator March 16, 1993 Stuart Stovin Steven Elkins Architects INC 610 Market Street Suite 201 Kirkland, Washington 98033 RE: Village Place North - Ernst Building Renovation Dear Mr. Stovin: We are writing in response to your letter of March 9, 1993 concerning setbacks for the addition to the former Ernst Building on the Village Place North site. The Zoning Ordinance (4-31-10) calls for ten foot setbacks for new structures which are 25 feet or less in height. Under this regulation, the existing portion of the Ernst building may remain at the present 7.4 foot setback. Similarly, the proposed approximately 18 foot setback for the addition to the building would be consistent with City regulations. If you or Mr. Laskow have additional questions, please feel free to contact us. Sincerely, Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 Tnc on ocra rnw^raNc<nn RFrv''r Fn'AATFRIAL.1r.POSPCONSI'�1ER 1 10iS `Z CITY JF RENTON 9,i ..a Hearing Examiner Earl Clymer, Mayor Fred J.Kaufman CITY OF RENTON MAR 0 8 1993 March 5, 1993 RECEIVEV CITY CLERK'S OFFICE Thomas A. Goeltz Davis Wright Tremaine 2600 Century Square 1501 4th AVE Seattle, WA 98101-1688 Re: Extension of Village Place North File No. CU;SA;V-078-90 Dear Mr. Goeltz: This office reads the discretionary language of the site plan code to allow one extension with discretion as to both the time period and the approval itself. This is particularly relevant given the language of Section 4-18-4(E). With the exception of Rezones, the section cited above limits all land use permits, including Conditional Use Permits not subject to other limitations, to a two (2) year limitation . It further gives discretion to grant one (1) extension for a maximum of one (1) year. If this office can be of further assistance please feel free to write. Sincerely,Q t FRED J. KAUFMAN HEARING EXAMINER FJK:wmb cc: City Clerk Building Division Don Erickson Lenora Blauman 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2593 4 DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LAW OFFICES 2600 CENTURY SQUARE • 1501 FOURTH AVENUE • SEATTLE,WASHINGTON 98101-1688 (206)622-3150 F'Y THOMAS A. GOELTZ i (206)628-7662 February 23, 1993 V R6- Sti y .Y 99,E �®tic Mr. Fred Kaufman Hearing Examiner City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue Renton, Washington 98055 Re: Extension of Village Place North CU; ECF; SA; V-078-90 Dear Fred: Thank you for your recent letter granting an extension for the Village Place North approvals. I am writing to clarify the length',15fLthe extension. Renton's site plan code speaks of "a single two (2) year extension" which may be granted for good cause:: I am not aware of any specific code provisions regarding the time period for a conditional use permit. Can you please clarify if your letter extends site plan approval for the single two-year period referenced in the code and if the conditional use permit is correspondingly extended for the same time as the site plan. Thank you again for your consideration. Respectfully submitted, DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE Thomas A. G tz 30285\1\00003.LTR. . -• Seattle • FAX: (206)628-7040 • TELEX:328919 DWT SEA ANCHORAGE,ALASKA • BELLEVUE, WASHINGTON • BOISE,IDAHO • Los ANGELES, CALIFORNIA PORTLAND, OREGON • RICHLAND,WASHINGTON • WASHINGTON,D.C. February 1, 1993 Michael Sandorffy Managing General Partner Renton Village Associates 800 Fifth Avenue, Suite 3700 Seattle, WA 98104-3122 Re: Village Place North File No.: CU;SA;V-078-90 Dear Mr. Sandorffy: I have reviewed the request to extend the Site Plan approval and Conditional Use permit. At this time, it seems appropriate to grant a one year extension for both Site Plan and Conditional Use permits. If this office can be of further assistance please feel free to write. Sincerely, FRED J. KAUFMAN HEARING EXAMINER FJK:wmb cc: City Clerk Building Department Don Erickson Lenora Blauman DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE '� 6 oMFNr p� LAW OFFICES P/�� ? N pNNING 2600 CENTURY SQUARE • 150I FOURTH AVENUE ' SEATTLE,WASHINGTON 9810I-1688 /�►G�7 ? ' �� (206) 622 3150 _ `/ i i THOMAS A. GOELTZ 0 (206)628-7662 February 23, 1993 U Mr. Fred Kaufman Hearing Examiner City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue Renton, Washington 98055 Re: Extension of Village Place North CU; ECF; SA; V-078-90 Dear Fred: Thank you for your recent letter granting an extension for the Village Place North approvals. I am writing to clarify the length of the extension. Renton's site plan code speaks of "a single two (2) year extension" which may be granted for good cause. I am not aware of any specific code provisions regarding the time period for a conditional use permit. Can you please clarify if your letter extends site plan approval for the single two-year period referenced in the code and if the conditional use permit is correspondingly extended for the same time as the site plan. Thank you again for your consideration. Respectfully submitted, DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE Thomas A. G tz 30285\1\00003.LTR Seattle FAX: (206)628-7040 • TELEX:328919 DWT SEA ANCHORAGE,ALASKA • BELLEVUE, WASHINGTON ' BOISE, IDAHO • Los ANGELES,CALIFORNIA PORTLAND,OREGON • RICHLAND,WASHINGTON • WASHINGTON, D.C. CITY k"F RENTON Hearing Examiner Earl Clymer, Mayor Fred J.Kaufman CITY OF RENTON FEB 1 1993 REGEIvtU February 1, 1993 CITY CLERK'S OFFICE Michael Sandorffy Managing General Partner Renton Village Associates 800 Fifth Avenue, Suite 3700 Seattle, WA 98104-3122 Re: Village Place North File No.: CU;SA;V-078-90 Dear Mr. Sandorffy: I have reviewed the request to extend the Site Plan approval and Conditional Use permit. At this time, it seems appropriate to grant a one year extension for both Site Plan and Conditional Use permits. If this office can be of further assistance please feel free to write. Sincerely, FRED J. KAUFMAN HEARING EXAMINER FJK:wmb cc: City Clerk Building Department Don Erickson Lenora Blauman win mill Avenue Smith - Renton_ Washington 98055 - (206)235-2593 RENTON VILLAGE ASSOCIATES 800 FIFTH AVENUE • SUITE 3700 • SEATTLE,WASHINGTON 98104-3122 • (206)682-6868 • (FAX)682-1040 14 January, 1993 Mr. Fred Kaufman • 4 ; Hearing Examiner City of Renton 0/ "9 <<>100A 200 Mill Avenue 43< �1 Renton, WA 98055 � ' s, "G a, 9901 RE: CU; ECF; SA; V-078-90 '4. • Village Place North Dear Mr. Kaufman: It is our understanding that the Site Plan for the above referenced project was approved by the City of Renton on March 1, 1991 and that the Conditional Use was approved on June 17, 1991.- •;,-It• -is-also, understood that these approvals are for a two (2) year period commencing on-•the;date of approval. Due to economic conditions that are out of our control, the tenant(s) that have expressed interest in this project are unable, at this time, to give a final commitment to this project. It is our hope that the economy may improve enough in the near term so that this project can be completed. Therefore, via this letter we ask for an extension on both the Site Plan and Conditional Use Permits. If additional information is required, please feel free to contact us. Thank you for this consideration. Sincerely, RENTON VILLAGE ASSOCIATES Tel Sandorffy Managing General Partner. cc: Loren Laskow Don Erickson .; • Lenora Blauman ._. „CITY; OF' RfENTON DATE: January 25, 1993' - • •- TO: Fred J: Kaufman Hearing Exam iner -.FROM: Donald K.-Erickson;Zoning,Administrator- ' Lenora Blauman, Project Manager • ^ - SUBJECT: 'Village',Place North,(ECF;.SA•;-CU;-V-,078-90)'. .. We'are-writing in:support;of'the=request'by:Renton Village'Associates fora two,year extension to the existing,permit for improvementsto Village Place North-. - _ • - _• • , . The.;approved;:project .is, consistent with both 'current and' proposed --Comprehensive,,',Plan -Goals, Objectives and Policiesr ,We will-continue to.work with Renton Village-Associates:to ensure-that-the” '• -- ' - :•schedule for;installation of the planned:improvements'is timely,and appropriate with'.respect to-ongoing ' • development'in-the'Green River Valley: ' ' . • _ If you have questions.or would.Pike additional information please contact us: ; - " ' Thank you for.your consideration: ' • • • memo SA-078-90 o m ti DECLARATION OF COVENANT 1� THISDECLARATION OF COVENANT ("Covenant") is made this C2 ' ''T day oftic-BF_k , 1992 , by RENTON VILLAGE ASSOCIATES ("Declarant") for a future roadway dedication. RECITALS A. Declarant owns certain real property located within the 8 Renton Village Shopping Center in the City of Renton ("City") , which is legally described in Exhibit A hereto and incorporated herein by reference ("Property") . B. Declarant intends to extend an improved road to be called Lake Avenue South, and legally described on Exhibit B § attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference c\J ("Roadway") , through its Property in conjunction with the cp construction of an office building on its Property. This NCovenant is recorded to implement a condition of the City's CD approval of site plan File No. SA-078-90 for future dedication of — the Roadway. N Now, therefore, Declarant hereby declares, conveys and establishes the following covenant: 1. Obligation to Dedicate Road Right-of-Way. Declarant hereby covenants and agrees to dedicate to the City the right-of- way and improvements constituting the Roadway to the City to be used and maintained as a public street upon a request by the City. 2 . Covenant to Run with the Land. This Covenant shall run with the land and be binding upon any future owner of all or any portion of the Property containing the Roadway. Upon dedication, this Covenant shall terminate automatically without any further action by Declarant or any other party. Prior to completion of such dedication, this Covenant may be amended and/or terminated only upon the express consent of the City. GOELT\01007.AGM/7.9.92 Seattle IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Covenant is executed effective upon the date first above written. RENTON VILLAGE ASSOCIATES, a Washington general partnership By I s Ge eral Par ner Exhibit A - Legal Description of Property Exhibit B - Legal Description of Road. Right-of-Way STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ss. COUNTY OF KING Ln Oc-��E5� CV On this ;�I rT day of � 1992 , before me, a CNotary Public in and for the State of Washington, personally N appearedil«Nfl DNfaa5t personally known to me (or proved to me CD on the basis of satisory evidence) to be the person who N executed this instrument, on oath stated that ./-(e_ was authorized to execute the instrument, and acknowledged it as the General Partner of RENTON VILLAGE ASSOCIATES to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument.. IN WITNESS WHEREOF., I have hereunto set my hand and official seal the day and year first above written. •s' ". eo Pei(1.2c-AlY1 ��<yr- ei4t;•:,99`�,.1. NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State a No'►Aay TA:N of Washington, residing at • : —�t,. : My appointment expires • •4j, PUBLIC as rey •.oe �� 2��4 Ai �1WASN��tnt ; °°.°° GOELT\01007.AGM/7.9.92 Seattle 2 .EXHIBIT A 1 of 3 • • / • 92IU2902� I � 0 AREAS EXHIBIT , __._....:-----'---r------ ,- 1\\,, .. 7 860 SQ..FT.± q �/ . 4I•6S .< H kl PROPOSED RIGHT OF WAY 5 • 8, �. L- � �, LOT C- I 341 ,279 SQ.FT.± ' �' ��8 G o^' �,�, . LOT C-2 214,347 SQ.FT.± oU :� �o� L ' , g2'' ff''� e_� O 1 iP." ku \\\ GNy�/4 �•08. L.. 367 Zb v QQ \\ C7,p2vA,r/�' /4 • - -- w .°-' i p`kip ioi<O�, L �LC./ •o�.✓y.• l� • =�hhpp(7 BiQ/l,A� \I 40N- 01 -i:,..2 7 44,,,. . ..,06 ,, .._ci //. ../p.."- 7,67 ., _ ,I ,615 ,. ��:�- 3 • �,'- /5o.00 • �, ,�s 1 L y, e� ) M . t. /6 .s>.���-47- , LOT N- LOT pry . ,� �, %`� •N • . V ,�T,,T,o� C-1�o o U") Tip X k !OT - - C .2 e ' CNI . 8� •cm �._ , /46.732 --,� Z %n189'28 l8 E"R r, • �f • • 0 �� J // i/ •• H z •� h a '� . LOT C -- . Lk. a C\JN �� "OLD""LOT L/is/Ecf' o o.' . . Q U, ' o - ' - LLA. 001 -&S ill o �� _� 0 ;� Ate. N$5'57'14"3q/. . ` p, �- o POINT ��' 2O5./ �` k n�': �, ._ t 6 „ �� m ¢ NE CORNER PEG-ci-e Cl-it�G _9 a i. oN SECT/O/N /9 TWP.23 N.,RGE,5E. Lo s-ram' p, N.e srr - 19 4 28- : ' r �o o �- _ `o �` �9c� . N O EA=7NS7- . / a'/DO i \ . j O . ,--cw.20/YTAL �E ,po 4, 800/,0, i • /• ‘ . - :'‘'....,\\\LI'\ . . . . . .6. 3. 1. - . • -rift -" 1 r r// ;a.s. %q,l4.Y'14, Np /60./6.1 'd• - - tieq o -ox- , - oz ,o r I; B 4P) y t/ - 2 `oiQ,,, is 9 -mar !v1 .�OUTf/ E/S/TOit/ "/LLAGE �L o .r�Asey�,y9 $p ...A/0 9..-./.3g e� rls, �'\ 7 ///.oS 4. �� G�/Tm ��oic��TE� , ,- E��- ti t; • y� �.� sv .v ( ` 137�3 tb�l �L _` J jam_ ,/ I .., -psi0§�Ai Lii1V l +. EXHIBIT A 2 of 3 • • A '- - That portion of Blocks 11, 12, 14 and 15, C.D. Hillmans Earlington Warden Addition Division No. 1 as recorded in Volume 17 of Plats,. Page 74, Records of King County, Washington, together with portions of vacated 994th Avenue South, vacated 96th• Avenue South, vacated 9th Avenue South, vacated 9th Place South, vacated 10th Avenue South and- the vacated alleys between 9th Avenue South and 9th Place South and also between 9th_ Place South and 10th Avenue South, all vacated under Ordinance 2051 of the City of Renton and, that portion. of the northeast quarter of Section 19, Township 23 North, Range-5 East, W.M. in King County, Washington, more particularly described as follows: • Commencing at the northeast corner of the southwest quarter of said northeast quarter; thence S' O1 04' 08" W along the east line of said southwest quarter, a distance of'250.02 feet; thence N 89°44'02" W, a distance of 18.28 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; thence S 61°42' 59" W, ,a distance of 258.92 feet; thence S 00°02' 16" E, a distance of 248. 94 feet to. the northerly margin of Primary State (y Highway No. 1, Jct. SSH No. 2-H to Jet. Psh No. 2 in Renton (also CD known as State Road No. 405) as approved October 31, 1961-the latest N revision being November 7, 1986; thence westerly northwesterly and CD northerly along said margin the following courses: N 89°49' 091' W, Na distance of 44. 72 feet; thence S 83°23' 09" W, a distance of 82.06 feet; thence N 89°54' 45" W, a distance of 241.66 feet to a- point on a curve having a radius of 390.8 feet and having a radial bearing of • S 17°05' 13" W; thence northwesterly along said curve through a central angle of 32°52' 06 an arc distance of 224. 19 feet; thence N 40°02' 41" W a distance of 150.00 feet; thence along a tangent curve to the left with a radius of 288. 8 feet through a central angle of 16°15' 36", an arc distance of 81. 96 feet; thence leaving said margin, .N 14°17' 27" E, a distance of 248585 feet; thence S 70 00'00" E, a distance of 98.00 feet; thence N- 00 51' 26" E, a distance of 286.24 feet thence along the westerly extention and the south line of land described in- lease to Standard Oil Company of California dated January 21, 1964, N 89°28' 13" E. a distance of 159.53. feet; . thence leaving, said south -line M 00°31'47" W, a distance of 181. 18 feet to the southerly' margin of Grady Way (also known as Secondary State Highway- No. 1-L) being 100 feet wide as presently established; thence northeasterly along said southerly margin N 77°28' 26" E, a distance of 144.07 feet to the northeast corner of land described in said lease to Standard Oil Company of California; thence S 00°31' 47". E along the east line of said land, a distance of 211. 12 feet to the south- east corner of land described in said' lease; thence S 89°28' 13" W along the south line of said, a distance of 10.09 feet; thence leaving said south line_ S 01°35' 52" E, a distance of 13.. 79 feetito a curve having a radius of 245.00 feet and having a .radial bearing of S 89°28' 18" 'W; thence southeasterly along said curve through a. central angle- of 41°11' 18", an arc distance of 176. 12 feet; thence S 41 43100,, E, a distance of 201.41 feet to. a tangent curve to the left having a radius of 245.00 feet; thence southeasterly along..said curve through a central angle of 48°O1' 02", an arc distance 205. 32 feet; thence S 89°44' 02" E; a' distance -of 111. 05 feet to the TREE POINT OF BEGINNING. 'al /,/13 a06, • $ EXHIBIT A 3 of 3 • • • • i1/Ew LaT- C That portion of Block 12, C.D. Hillman's Earlington Garden Addition Division No.. 1 as recorded in Volume 17 of Plats, Page 74, Records of King County, Washington, together with portions of vacated 96th Avenue South, vacated 9th Avenue South: and the vacated alley between 9th Avenue South and 9th. Place South, all vacated under Ordinance 2051. of the City of Renton and that portion of the northeast quarter of Section 19, Township 23 North, Range 5' East, W.M. in King County, Washington, more particularly described as followss • Commencing at the northeast corner of the southwest quarter' of said northeast quarter; thence S '01°04'08" W along the east line of said southwest quarter, a distance of 250.02 feet; thence N 89°44'02" W, a distance of 18.28 feet to the TRUE. POINT OF BEGINNING; thence con- tinuing N 89°44' 02" W, a distance of 111.05 feet. to a tangent curve to the right having a radius of 245 feet. thence northwesterly along Lo said curve, through a central angle of 48 01'02", an arc distance 'of O205.32 feet; thence N 41°43' 00" W, a distance of 201.41 feet to a • ON tangent curve to the right having a radius of 245 feet; thence northerly CV along said curve through a central angle of 41°11' 18", an arc distance CD of 176. 12 feet; thence N 01°35' 52" W, a distance of 13. 79 feet to a ( j point on the soutt line of land described in lease to Standard Oil ON Company of California dated January 21, 1964; thence N- 89°28' 13 E, along said south line, a distance of 10.09 feet to. the. southeast corner of said land; thence. N 00°31' 47" W' along the east line of said land; a distance of 211. 12 feet to the southerly margin of Grady Way (also known as _Secondary State Highway No. 1-L) being • ' 100 feet in width as presentl established; thence northeasterly along said south margin, N 77 28' 26" E, a distance of 203.55 feet to a tangent curve to the left having a radius of 3869. 71 feet; thence along said curve through a central angle of 11°14' 08", an arc distance of 758.84 feet to a point on the west line, of land described in Exhibit "A" of Quit Claim Deed under King County•Recording • No. 8208270355; thence leaving said south margin of Grady Way, S 01.°04' 08" W along said west line, a distance of 840. 76 feet to the north margin of Renton Village Place as conveyed to the City of Renton under King County Recording No. 5475310; thence N 89- 44' 02" W., a distance of 372.42 feet along the north margin of said Renton Village. Place to the east margin of vacated said 96th Avenue South; thence S 01°04' 08" W along said east margin, a distance', of 60.01 feet to the southwest corner of said Renton Village Place; thence N 89°44, 02" W, a distance of 48.28 feet to the- TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. • EXHIBIT B • ' Legal- Description ' • • Proposed Right of Way • That portion of Lots "B"' and, "C", City- of .Renton Lot Line . - Adjustment No. 001-88. which lies in -the northeast quarter of Section 19, Township. 23 North, Range '5 East,W.M, as shown in instrument under King County Recording No. 8911139006 described as follows: Commencing at the northeast • corner of the 'southwest quarter y;, . of .said northeast quarter; thence S01"04'08"W along the east line of said southwest quarter, a distance: of 250.02 f.eet;. • thence S8W"44'02' E', a distance of 30. 00 feet . to the. ' southwest corner of South Renton Village Place as conveyed . to the. City of Renton Under King County Auditor's File No.. ' 5475310; said point being the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; - _ thence N01°04'08"E along the. west line. thereof, ' a distance. l,C, of 60.01 feet to the northwest. corner thereof; thence ' N , N89°44'02"W, a distance of 160. 16 feet to• a tangent curve to : Cthe. right having .a radius of 185 feet; thence northwesterly -. . N - along- said curve through a central angle of 48"01'02", an . . CD arc distance of 155.04' feet; thence N41"43'00"W, a distance°.; CV of 201,41 feet to a tangent curve to the right having a radius of 185 feet; thence northerly along said curve through a central angle -of 41°11' 18", an ar.c distance of . • 132.99 feet; thence NOO"32'28"E, a distance of 192..85 feet to a tangent curve to• the' right. having a radius of 55 feet; . thence northeasterly along said curve through a central angle of 76°55'58", an arc • distance of 73.85 feet. to the southerly right of way. line of South Grady Way (State Highway No. 1-L) ; thence 877°28'26"W along said southerly right of way line., a distance. of 180. 42 feet to a point 'on a curve concaved to the -southwest having a radius of 55 feet;. a radial line of said curve through said point bearing. N12°31'34"W; thence southeasterly along said curve through a central angle of 100"55'42", an. arc distance of 96.88 feet; . thence S01°35'52"E, a distance of 141 .55 feet to an angle point on said Lot "C";' thence south and southeasterly along the southwesterly margin of said- Lot "C" the following coures: S01.35'52"E, a distance of 13.79 feet to. a tangent curve to the left having a radius of. 245 feet; thence. . southeasterly along. said curve through a central angle of ' 41°11' 18", an arc . distance of 176. 12 feet; thence 8.41®43.'000E, as distance. of 201.41. feet to. a tangent curve to the left .haviria a radius of 245 ,feet; thence southeasterly • along said curve. through a central angle of 48"01'02", an. arc distance of' 205.32 feet; thence S8944'02"E, a distance ' .- 159.33 feet to the TRUE POINT OF .BEGINNING, . ft:tik.K444134 ' , , J . 9-1-92. , ,f, ,t • 86064 f ,- • 13731 _ l . l,I; i F>\\`!,/ ,,..., CITY OF RE .. TON ,....f?‘ MEMORANDUM + TIM )* DATE: January 25, 1993 TO: Fred J. Kaufman, Hearing Examiner FROM: Donald K. Erickson, Zoning Administrator Lenora Blauman, Project M er SUBJECT: Village Place North (ECF; SA; CU; V 078-90) We are writing in support of the request by Renton Village Associates for a two year extension to the existing permit for improvements to Village Place North. The approved project is consistent with both current and proposed Comprehensive Plan Goals, Objectives and Policies. We will continue to work with Renton Village Associates to ensure that the schedule for installation of the planned improvements is timely and appropriate with respect to ongoing development in the Green River Valley. If you have questions or would like additional information, please contact us. Thank you for your consideration. CC: memo RENTON VILLAGE ASSOCIATES I -r ,I 800 FIFTH AVENUE • SUITE 3700 • SEATTLE,WASHINGTON 98104-3122 • (206)682-6868 • (FAX)682-1040 13 January, 1993 DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY OF RENTON JAN 1 4 1993 Lenora Blauman City of Renton ' Planning/Building/Public{{�� Works Department 200 Mill Avenue Renton WA 98055 RE: CU; ECF, . -078-90 Village Place North Dear Lenora: It is our understanding that Site Plan for the above referenced project was approved by the City of Renton on March 1, 1991 and that the Conditional Use was approved on June 17, 1991. It is also understood that these approvals are for a two (2) year period commencing on the date of approval. Due to economic conditions that are out of our control, the tenant(s) that have expressed interest in this project are unable, at this time, to give a final commitment to this project. It is our hope that the economy may improve enough in the near term so that this project can be completed. Therefore, via this letter we ask for an extension on both the Site Plan and Conditional Use Permits. If additional information is required, please feel free to contact us. Thank you for this consideration. Sincerely, RENTON VILLAGE ASSOCIATES el Sandorffy Managing General Partner • 41 %/0 + CITY OF RENTON Administrative Services Earl Clymer, Mayor Dan Clements, Director December 8, 1992 Loren Laskow Renton village Management Corporation Evergreen Building, Suite 240 15 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Re: Declaration of Covenant Village Place North (SA-078-90) Dear Loren: Please find enclosed the Declaration of Covenant with King County's recording number 9210290251. If I can be of further assistance, please call meat 235-2501. Sincerely, 2VICZ . Georgia A. Shives Office Assistant City Clerk's Office • 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 SA-078-90 ti o co ti DECLARATION OF COVENANT co THI DECLARATION OF COVENANT ("Covenant") is made this 1ST day of �'C ro6 F_/ , 1992 , by RENTON VILLAGE ASSOCIATES ("Declarant") for a future roadway dedication. RECITALS A. Declarant owns certain real property located within the 8 Renton Village Shopping Center in the City of Renton ("City") , which is legally described in Exhibit A hereto and incorporated a herein by reference ("Property") . B. Declarant intends to extend an improved road to be called Lake Avenue South, and legally described on Exhibit B § attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference c1i ("Roadway") , through its Property in conjunction with the 0 construction of an office building on its Property. This Covenant is recorded to implement a condition of the City's CQ CD approval of site plan File No. SA-078-90 for future dedication of — the Roadway. N LT, Now, therefore, Declarant hereby declares, conveys and establishes the following covenant: 1. Obligation to Dedicate Road Right-of-Way. Declarant hereby covenants and agrees to dedicate to the City the right-of- way and improvements constituting the Roadway to the City to be used and maintained as a public street upon a request by the City. 2 . Covenant to Run with the Land. This Covenant shall run with the land and be binding upon any future owner of all or any portion of the Property containing the Roadway. Upon dedication, this Covenant shall terminate automatically without any further action by Declarant or any other party. Prior to completion of such dedication, this Covenant may be amended and/or terminated only upon the express consent of the City. GOELT\01007.AGM/7.9.92 Seattle • IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Covenant is executed effective upon the date first above written. RENTON VILLAGE ASSOCIATES, a Washington general partnership By • I . s Ge eral Par ner Exhibit A - Legal Description of Property Exhibit B - Legal Description of Road Right-of-Way STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ss. COUNTY OF KING l.n n On this g_15T day of ,6 -1-7 CFI{ , 1992 , before me, a CD Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, personally N appeared rn 10011:/_, D0X j� personally known to me (or proved to me CD on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person who N executed this instrument; on oath stated that N was 0, authorized to execute the instrument, and acknowledged it as the General Partner of RENTON VILLAGE ASSOCIATES to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set .my hand and official seal the day and year first above written. ,,�9ttove�o is4 • :L' r)71 �� �Q• .....W••.�i `o,,, GCS L�,'`�'�-�T r F+,:;%% NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State .3 . NOTARY 1iiOP of Washington, residing at KaAdiritoW — : e My appointment expires Jo-( a-9 - a ?' WASH,� GOELT\01007.AGM/7.9.92 Seattle 2 _ • ' EXHIBIT A 1 of j 9210290251 o AREAS EXHIBIT i ;\\ PROPOSED RIGHT OF WAY 57,860 SQ..FT.± 8/q- 7/ �; 39�' � \\W LOT C- 1 341 ,279 SQ.FT.± ,P= -� B•� G �� ��� LOT C-2 214,347 SQ.FT.± Fo��4n y,,o� ` � , yz" '' ow • f- ) ,38‘ 1� \ • / o„tor33 _ --- oyb �6 v \Q �j �� 1 Cii 0,Ap ''.>"7 .‘-G')) c'1±- ..---- ;i0 iy°°c) 1 .9,42A,A.-- V. \I q ''';' '117(1"!\;' ' 1,‘ \itit v � �- 3� /50.o° �;6 0 { . NI kt )6h .' L07" f TAX k !OT -sit15 c m cv /46.7z - Z ,u89°za"rS g-_,f o % (Ni. � 'v89 Z8 �F i3.79 ' 0 • • 6° '{ - LOT "C ----- Illit ---- N /d s� "OLD"LOT L/HEMS' s Ss o r- 9 NB8'57'14"lq/ Q \ - % POINT 'Lk` 205,i - k i/so. 6-:_ "A" 03 `� NE CORER (�I ' n Q, •, \' � .EiEL`3 J ?_- �-- a 7 r u� °p , SW) N,E7 1Ecc'-e-et k. .t!" N''S 4 SCT/ON /9 TWO23 N RGE.St. Esser' Q \• Ate_ 19 4.28 ;1 Nibw' �� �9c' i Np E'PNS7- / s/00 �c arm i � \ . ` �•,0 Q/.T!//� ' fr. C.i 4 a o�v - b� -a esd. N tO �`ao �oT Li • fl/ - 4Y �Y� / T: � T V / as-� O /60./ � � 9 " o " - 1 ..?„ /. y ��OUTiy s Ei/TO.v /L L W k •/ Sy� p iry o�� C'�r � •�r�ET t o 9 '\\--11:1\111\ . . 4.' 2 ' - 'dr. • • • . EXHIBIT A 2 of. 3 ZEG�•4L �C'SC•�P/.� T/Oit/S • /' 1. b(/ Z4 T B That portion of Blocks 11, 12, 14 and 15, C. D. Hillmans Earlington• rarden Addition: Division No. ''1 as recorded, in Volume 17 of Plats, Page 74, Records. of King- County, Washington, - together with portions of vacated 94th Avenue South, vacated 96th Avenue South, vacated 9th Avenue South, vacated 9th Place South, vacated 10th Avenue South and the vacated alleys between 9th Avenue South and 9th Place. South and also between 9th Place South and loth Avenue South, all vacated under Ordinance 2051 of the City of Renton and that portion of the • northeast quarter of Section 19., ' Township. 2-3 North, Range 5 East,_ W.M. in King County, Washington, more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the northeast corner of' the southwest quarter of said northeast quarter;. thence .S 01 04' 08" W along the east line of said southwest quarter, a distance of 250.02 feet; 'thence N 89°44'02" W, a distance of 18.28 feet to . the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; thence o S 61°42' 59 W, a distance of 258. 92 feet; thence S 00- 02'16" E, a distance' of 248. 94 feet to the northerly margin of Primary State (N Highway No. 1, Jct. SSH' No. 2-M to Jet. Psh No. 2 in Renton (also NCD known as State Road No. 405) as approved October 31, 1961-the latest revision being November 7, 1986; thence. westerly northwesterly and CD northerly along said margin the following courses.: N 89°49' 09" W; Na distance of 44. 72 feet; thence S 83°23.' 09" W, a distance of 82.06' feet;. thence N 89°54' 45" W; a distance of 241.66 feet to a point on a • curve having a radius of 390.,8 feet and having a radial bearing of S 17°05' 13" W; thence northwesterly along said curve through a central angle of 32°52' 06", an arc distance of 224. 19 feet; thence N. 40°02' 41" W a distance of 150.00 feet; thence along, a tangent curve to the left with a radius of 288.8' feet through a central angle of .16°15' 36", an arc distance of 81.96 feet; thence leaving said margin, N 14°17' 27" E, a distance of 248b85. feet; thence. S 70 00' 00" E, a distance of 98.00 feet; ' thence N 0Q 51' 26" E, a distance of 286..24 feet thence along the westerly extention and the south, line of land described in lease to Standard Oil 'Company of California dated January 21, 1964, N 89°28' 13"' E', a distance of 159.53 feet;. thence leaving said south line N 00°31'47" W, a distance of 181. 18' feet to the southerly. margin of Grady Way (also known as Secondary' State Highway NO. 1-L) being 100 feet wide as presently established; thence northeasterly along said southerly margin N 77°28' 26" E, a distance of- 144.07 feet to the northeast corner of land described in said lease to Standard Oil Company of 'California; thence 5: 00°31'47" E- along- the. east line of said land, a distance of- 211. 12 feet to the south- east corner of land described in said, lease; thence S 89°28' 13" W along, the south line. of said, a distance of 10.09 feet; thence leaving said south line S 01 35' 52 E, a distance of 13. 79 feet .to •a curve having a radius of 245.00 feet and having a radial bearing of S. 89°28' 18" W; thence southeasterly along said curve through a central angle of 41°11' 18", an arc distance of 176. 12 feet; thence S 41 43' 00" E, a distance of 201.41 feet to a tangent curve. to the left having a radius of. 245.00 feet,; thence southeasterly' along said curve through a central angle of 48°O1' 02", an arc distance 205.32' feet; thence S 89°44' 02"- E, a distance of 111.05 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. 5,0" /3 01006- S (4, • EXHIBIT A 3 of 3 • • • /vEwLQ7. . C. That portion of Block 12, C.D. Hillman's Earlington Garden Addition Division No. 1 as recorded in. Volume 17 of Plats, Page 74, Records of King County, Washington, together with portions of vacated 96th Avenue South, vacated 9th Avenue South and the vacated alley between 9th Avenue South. and 9th Place_ South, all vacated under Ordinance 2051 of the City of Renton and that portion of the. northeast quarter of Section 19, Township 23' North, Range 5 East, 'W.M. in King County, ,Washington, more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the northeast corner of the southwest quarter of said northeast quarter; thence S 01°04'08 W along. the. east line of said southwest quarter, a distance of 250.02 feet; thence N 89°44'02" W, a distance of 18.28 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; thence con- tinuing N 89°44' 02" W, a distance of- 111.05 feet to a tangent curve to the right having a radius of 245 feet. thence northwesterly along • • 0said curve through a central angle of 48 01'02", an arc distance of CQ 205. 32 feet;. thence N 41°43' 00" W, a distance of'201.41 feet to a CD 0, tangent curve . to the right having a radius of 245 feet; thence northerly CV along said curve through a central angle• of 41°11' 18", an arc distance • O of 176. 12 feet; thence N 01°35' 52" W, a distance of 13. 79 feet to a eQ• point on the soutt line of land described in lease to Standara Oil O'` Company of. California dated January 21, 1964; thence N 89°28' 13" E, along said south line, a distance of 10.09 feet to the southeast . corner of, said land;. thence. N 00°31' 47 W along the east line of said land; a distance of 211. 12 feet to the, southerly margin. of . Grady Way (also, known as Secondary State. Highway No. 1-L) being 100 feet in width as presentl established; thence northeasterly along said south margin, N 77 28' 26" E, a distance of 203.55 feet to a tangent curve to the left having. a radius of 3869. 71 feet; thence along said curve through a central angle of 11°14' 08", an arc distance of 758.84 feet to a point on the west line of land described in Exhibit "A" of Quit. Claim Deed under King County Recording No. 8208270355;. thence leaving said south margin of Grady. Way, • S 01°04' 08" W, along said west line, a distance of 840. 76 feet to. the north margin of Renton Village Place as conveyed to the City of Renton under King County Recording No.. 5475310; thence N 89°44'02" W; a distance of 372.42 feet along the north Margin of said 'Renton Village Place to the east margin of vacated said 96th Avenue South; thence S O1°04' 08" W' along said east margin, a. distance of 60.01 feet to the southwest corner of said Renton Village Place; thence N 89°44" 02"' .W, a distance of 48. 28 feet to the TRUE' POINT OF BEGINNING. • EXHIBIT B' Legal Description Proposed Right of Way That portion Of Lots "B" and. "C!', City' of Renton Lot Line Adjustment No. 001-88 which lies in the northeast quarter of Section 19, Township 23 North, Range 5 East,W.M. as shown in instrument under King. County Recording No.. 8911139006 , described as follows,: Commencing at the northeast corner of the southwest quarter of said northeast quarter; thence S01 °04'08"W along the .east' • line of' said southwest quarter, a .distance Of 250,02 feet; thence S89°44'02"E, a distance of 30. 00 feet to the southwest corner- of South Renton Village Place as. conveyed to the City of Renton under King County Auditor's File No. 5475310; said point being the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; thence N0t°04'08"E along the west line thereof, -a distance • 1.0 of 60..01 feet to the northwest corner there.of; thence CV N89°44'02"W, a distance of 160. 16 feet to a tangent curve to' the right having .a radius of 185 feet; thence. northwesterly , N along said curve through' a central angle. of 48°01'02"; an CD' arc distance of 155.04 feet; thence N41°43'00"W, a distance CV of 201.41 feet to a tangent ' curve to the right having a • l7"' radius of- 185 feet;' thence northerly along said curve' through a central angle. of 41°1.1' 18", an arc 'distance of 1`32.99 feet; thence NOO°32'28"E, a_ distance of 192.85 feet to a tangent curve to 'the right having a radius of 55 feet ; thence northeasterly along said curve through a central angle- of 76°55'58", an arc distance of 73.85. feet to the southerly right of way line of South Grady Way (State Highway No. 1-L); thence. 8777°28'26"W along said southerly ' right of way line, a distance of 180.42 feet to a point on a • curve concaved to the southwest having a 'radius of 55 feet; a radial line of said curve' through said point' bearing N12°31'34"W; thence- southeasterly along said curve through a central angle -of 100°55'42', an arc distance of 96.88 feet; thence S01°35'52"E, a distance, of 141 .55 feet to an angle point on said Lot ".C"; thence south and southeasterly along • the southwesterly margin of said Lot "C" the. following coures: S01°35'52"E, a distance of 13.79 feet to a tangent curve to the left having', a. radius of 245 feet;. thence southeasterly. along said curve through a central angle of 41°11' 18", an arc . distance of 176. 12 feet; thence S41°43'00"E, a distance of 201.41 feet to a. tangent curve. to, the_ le.ft having a radius of 245 feet; thence southeasterly ' along said curve through a central angle of 48°01'02", an. arc distance... of 205.32 feet; .thence. S89°44'02"E, a distance 159.33 feet to the TRUE -POINT OF' BEGINNING. . R. ii.444,8 .r:..:................. .............w_. �� 9 86064 -1-92 -�1 � ......,.. ap' rg . f 4 13;31 (Si ti. ..,., • .f C/$Tc-0. • i k�iJ CITY OF R E N T O N CITY OF RENTON MEMORANDUM OCT 2 6 9992 RECEIVED fV CLERK'S OFFICE DATE: October 26, 1992 TO: Marilyn Petersen, City Clerk FROM: Lenora Blauman, Senior Planner c S SUBJECT: Village Place North- Lake Avenue Covenants Cu , i4- 90 - 0 7 g Attached please find the original, signed covenants for the Lake Avenue extension, which your office • requested in order to finalize approval of Village Place North. I have also attached the approval memorandum from Larry Warren. If you have questions or would like additional information, please contact me. Thank you for your assistance. ___414.464,64 ei,-u ca_ 6- 17- 9/ % y .7 CITY jF RENTONA; > "LL ' Office of the City Attorney Earl Clymer, Mayor Lawrence J. Warren May 15, 1992 TO: Donald K. Erickson, Principal Planner.:LA ;r11NG OIV1SION ('1T" oc RENTOM FROM: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney so,.. STAFF CONTACT: Lenora Blauman RE: Village Place North (SA 078-90) - Renton Village Associates Dear Don: I have reviewed the draft Declaration of Covenant for Lai Avenue South and the same is approved as to legal form. (7;f1/1-1 Lawrence J. Warren LJW:as. cc: Mayor Earl Clymer A8 .83 : 11 . Post Office Box 626- 100 S 2nd Street-Renton, Washington 98057- (206)255-8678 • CITY OF RENTON MEMORANDUM DATE: March 24, 1992 TO: Lenore Blauman, Senior Planner • FROM: Marilyn Petersen, City Clerk SUBJECT: Renton Village Associates Site Approval, File No. SA-078-90 The subject application was conditionally approved by the City Council on June 17, 1991, following appeal. The conditional,use permit and the site plan were approved conditioned upon the applicant's compliance with the ERC conditions, the non-appealed conditions of the hearing examiner, and the conditions set forth in the Planning and Development Committee report. One of the conditions required the property owner to record a covenant to dedicate a right-of-way so that the city may use Lake Avenue as a city street at a later date. Until the covenant is recorded with King County, this application is not approved. Please advise status of the covenants. The last time we contacted you on this matter was November,. 1991. Thank you for your assistance. cc: Larry Warren Don Erickson . • 4I.anning and Devele; Committee Report 3 • • 1 . Improvements made 'to Lake may be made to full city standards. Full width of the, street is' permissible at th.is . time. Also, the applicant may install speed bumps. and signing fox- controls- The committee recognizes that Lake -should not be used as a thoroughfare. .or alternate traffic route, at this ,time. The • applicant m -tAdedicate a right-of-way so that the city may use Lake a city street t a later date. 'kc cl .(se c�IGZ at 2 . the committee has insisted that it be a fully integrated campus with landscaping, pathways and raised walkways . There must be easy access throughout the site for all users . 3 . The committee wants to insure handicap accessible and pedestrian-friendly linkage throughout the site . 4 . The applicant stipulated that . its contribution to ,the TBZ in. the amount of ' $440 , 000 . 00+ shall not revert back to the applicant if not spent by the city within 6 years . • The • applicant stipulated. that 'it waives any claim for reimbursement of those funds. • 5 . 20 percent of •the parking in the parking_ garage is in reserve, at the city' s request. • 6 . This site must be made compatible and user-friendly with the Talbot Hill neighborhood and the Park and Ride located on Grady Way_. There must be pedestrian signalization 'across Grady. 7 . The plan for pedestrian circulation on the site 'must• •be submitted' to the council committee for input . The committee recommends that the council approve the conditional use permit and the site plan - conditioned upon , the applicant' s compliance with the ERC conditions, the non=appealed conditions of the hearing examiner, and the conditions set forth in this report . • Nancy Mabh'ews, Chair 2 /1 ( �� . • Bob Edwards, Arice-Chair • Yukehe, • • Kathy Klolker-Wheeler, Member • ZL.F : as . CITY9 :3 . • CITY OF RENTON DEC 1 21991 RECEIVED CITY CLERK'S OFFICE KANNINGREN DIVISION CITYO CITY OF RENTON NOV 2 61991 MEMORANDUM E r ETV E D DATE: November 26, 1991 TO: Lenora Blauman, Senior Planner FROM: Marilyn Petersen, City Cler SUBJECT: Renton Village Associates Site Approval, SA-078-90 The subject application was approved by the City Council on June 17, 1991. The Council added the requirement for a restrictive covenant dedicating a right-of-way so that the City may use Lake Avenue as a city street at a later date. My question--when will the covenant be executed and recorded? We would like to remove the item from our ever-expanding tickle file. Thanks for monitoring this requirement. „Ai caAIL. cs-Thr\ .n;d lG . /^c . — 1 ct cl f A171'1P--° iv APPROVE D PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE CI.L-O7; --w PLANNING Div;Si ; COMMITTEE REPORT CITY OF RENTCN June 17 , 1991 jUN 1 9 iGg.i Renton Village Appeal - Site Plan and Conditional Use JFermit fSA;J CU-078-90) (Referred 4/22/91) Date of Hearing Examiner' s Decision: March 5 , 1991 . Subject Property: Renton Village Center/South Grady Way. Subject Proposal : 1 . 260, 363 sq. ft. office/retail sales 10 stories/133 ft. 2 . 6 level parking garage . 3 . Renovation of existing retail area. SA, CU-078-90 The Planning and Development Committee met on May 16, 1991 , May 23, 1991 and June 6, 1991 to consider the appeal of the applicant and recalled that this applicant came before the council in 1988 for the purpose of building the Renton Village Theater. At that time the hearing examiner had required a road. The council found that the requirement of a road was premature . The council required a covenant to install a road upon the next application for site plan approval ( September 19 , 1988 SA 103-87 ) . The applicant complied. The current appeal focuses on: A. Flooding: Storage of flood waters on the ground floor of the garage . Regional flooding problems . B. 10-Story Building: View blockage and traffic . A. Flooding. The committee finds the following errors of findings and conclusions . The hearing examiner concludes (Conclusion No. 28 ) that "the flooding problem increases the potential for injury both to personal property and to persons . " (Conclusion No. 30) . . . "utilizing the lower level of the public garage reintroduces the potential for injury. " The applicant' s proposal "does nothing about the existing situation. " (Conclusion No. 14 ) . "The current level of flooding would not be modified. . . " (Finding No . 33 ) . The committee finds , based on staff opinion, that the installation of a 72 ° drainage pipe to redirect the flooding to the Panther Creek Wetlands will have a favorable impact on flooding on this site. Further, the committee finds that storage of flood waters would not Copies : Jim Hanson Don Erickson Lenora Blauman (See change on page 3) Planning and Develnt Committee Report - 2 , unduly jeopardize the safety of the public due to infrequency, and the proposed signage for the parking garage. The applicant has stipulated that if paid parking is approved by the city council and is instituted in the garage and parking on the ground floor is precluded by flooding, there will be a commensurate number of stalls provided on the top parking level of the garage made available as free parking. The applicant has agreed to provide a covenant to the city regarding the resolution of the regional flooding problems . The applicant will agree to participate in an LID (or other funding mechanism) and further agree not to protest the formation of such an LID (or other funding mechanism) or the determination of their fair share of said LID (or other funding mechanism) . B. 10-Story Building. The committee finds that the city does not currently have a view ordinance and that the square footage of the proposed building in the proposed configuration is less of a blight on views to the residents than a lower and more squat building(s) for which no conditional use permit would be required. The applicant has • stipulated that they are consuming some of their densities despite the fact that the proposed building covers less square footage than a squat building would cover. Further, the applicant has stipulated that there will not be development of another building of this magnitude on this campus . The conditions of the ERC are still in place, and with those conditions being met, this building at this location is appropriate. The committee finds that the hearing examiner's conclusion that the proposed building is more appropriate for the CBD is in error. The committee finds the hearing examiner' s Conclusion No. 2 is in error, or at the least is unclear. There is no evidence in the record that the extra 3 stories on the office building will generate 15 to 20 percent more traffic to the area. It is noted that the hearing examiner's Conclusion No. 8 states that staff indicated the entire proposal would only add approximately 4 percent to the traffic in the area. The committee has reconciled these two conclusions by reasoning that the extra 3 stories will only add 15 to 20 percent of the 4 percent. That is less than a 1 percent increase in traffic in the area attributable to the extra 3 stories . Further, the hearing examiner's Conclusion No. 23 that traffic congestion will only be exacerbated by this development is misleading. The applicant could design a more squat building, for which no conditional use permit is required, and have the same traffic impacts . To require a lower building based on 1 percent traffic impact, which would still exist with a more squat building, is an error. The committee also discussed with the applicant the following: • Planning and Develdent Committee Report - 3 4110 1 . Improvements made to Lake may be made to full city standards . Full width of the street is permissible at this time. Also, the applicant may install speed bumps and signing for controls . The committee recognizes that Lake should not be used as a thoroughfare or alternate traffic route at this time. The applicant mustAdedicate a right-of-way so that the city may use Lake 4.s a city street at a later date. '((%0 re cer a- 2 . the committee has insisted that it be a fully integrated campus with landscaping, pathways and raised walkways . There must be easy access throughout the site for all users . 3 . The committee wants to insure handicap accessible and pedestrian-friendly linkage throughout the site. 4 . The applicant stipulated that its contribution to the TBZ in the amount of $440 , 000 . 00+ shall not revert back to the applicant if not spent by the city within 6 years . The applicant stipulated that it waives any claim for reimbursement of those funds . 5 . 20 percent of the parking in the parking garage is in reserve, at the city' s request. 6 . This site must be made compatible and user-friendly with the Talbot Hill neighborhood and the Park and Ride located on Grady Way. There must be pedestrian signalization across Grady. 7 . The plan for pedestrian circulation on the site must be submitted to the council committee for input . The committee recommends that the council approve the conditional use permit and the site plan conditioned upon the applicant ' s compliance with the ERC conditions, the non-appealed conditions of the hearing examiner, and the conditions set forth in this report . 64-L Nancy Matthews, Chair ,o,C 60(./..,/e Bob Edwards, Vice-Chair cti kle,okeki (.3[Va_12„_ Kathy Klolker-Wheeler, Member ZLF:as . CITY9 : 3 . %4 © CITY JF RENTON "LL Office of the City Attorney Earl Clymer, Mayor Lawrence J. Warren May 15, 1992 TO: Donald K. Erickson, Principal Planne,LANNMGDt\JtS" OifY p��ENTON FROM: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney a1�92 STAFF CONTACT: Lenora Blauman MAC RE: Village Place North (SA 078-90) - R on Village Associates Dear Don: I have reviewed the draft Declaration of Covenant for Lane Avenue South and the same is approved as to legal form. C.27/Q1-te- 14 Lawrence J. Warren LJW:as . cc : Mayor Earl Clymer A8 . 83 : 11 . Post Office Box 626 - 100 S 2nd Street- Renton, Washington 98057- (206) 255-8678 4% Q CITY JF RENTON Office of the City Attorney Earl Clymer, Mayor Lawrence J. Warren PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF RENTON December 2 , 1991 DEC 3 1991 Mr. Thomas A. Goeltz FRLLIVED Davis Wright Tremaine f� 2600 Century Square 1501 Fourth Avenue Seattle, Washington 98101-1688 Re: Reserved Parking Agreement; Village Place North City File No. SA/CU 078-90 Dear Mr. Goeltz : I have reviewed the above-referenced agreement and the same is approved as to legal form. Very -ly yours , Lawrence J. Warren LJW:as . cc : Mayor Clymer Don Erickson A8 . 77 : 03 . Post Office Box 626 - 100 S 2nd Street -Renton, Washington 98057 - (206) 255-8678 CITY OF RENTON fE(': u Z 1991 RECEIVED P�:0„:1NNIN�DiViSiC;N ITY CLERK'S OFFICE � D� KENCITY OF RENTONo� 2 6 �MEMORANDUM �� � DATE: November 26, 1991 TO: Lenora Blauman, Senior Planner FROM: Marilyn Petersen, City Cler�C, I er' / SUBJECT: Renton Village Associates Site Approval, SA-078-90 The subject application was approved by the City Council on June 17, 1991. The Council added the requirement for a restrictive covenant dedicating a right-of-way so that the City may use Lake Avenue as a city street at a later date. My question--when will the covenant be executed and recorded? We would like to remove the item from our ever-expanding tickle file. Thanks for monitoring this requirement. L („Nyti —.6 caAQ. • CITY OF RENTON MEMORANDUM DATE: November 26, 1991 TO: Lenora Blauman, Senior Planner FROM: Marilyn Petersen, City ClerV0-1 SUBJECT: Renton Village Associates Site Approval, SA-078-90 The subject application was approved by the City Council on June 17, 1991. The Council added the requirement for a restrictive covenant dedicating a right-of-way so that the City may use Lake Avenue as a city street at a later date. My question--when will the covenant be executed and recorded? We would like to remove the item from our ever-expanding tickle file. Thanks for monitoring this requirement. /lanning and Develc, it Committee Report - 3 1 . Improvements made to Lake may be made to full city standards . Full width of the street is permissible at this time. Also, the applicant may install speed bumps and signing for controls . The committee recognizes that Lake should not be used as a thoroughfare or alternate traffic route at this time. The applicant mu-tjdedicate a right-of-way so that the city may use Lake q.,s a city street at a later date. knoll ,cecbreYa_ 2 . the committee has insisted that it be a fully integrated campus with landscaping, pathways and raised walkways . There must be easy access throughout the site for all users . 3 . The ' committee wants to insure handicap accessible and pedestrian-friendly linkage throughout the site. 4 . The applicant stipulated that . its contribution to 'the TBZ in the amount of $440, Q00 . 00+ shall not revert back to the applicant if not spent by the city within 6 years . The applicant stipulated that it waives any claim for reimbursement of those funds . 5 . 20 percent of the parking in the parking garage is in reserve, at the city' s request. 6 . This site must be made compatible and user-friendly with the Talbot Hill neighborhood and the Park and Ride located on Grady Way. There must be pedestrian signalization across Grady. 7 . The plan for pedestrian circulation on the site must be submitted to the council committee for input•. The committee recommends that the council approve the conditional use permit and the site plan conditioned upon the applicant' s compliance with the ERC conditions, the non-appealed conditions of the hearing examiner, and the conditions set forth in this report. Nancy Mathews, Chair Bob Edwards, Vice-Chair r L Kathy Kiolker-Wheeler, Member ZLF: as . CITY9 : 3 . cc .a78•10 RENTON VILLAGE MA. ,AGEMENT CORPORATIC _. (206) 228-3000 EVERGREEN BUILDING • SUITE 240 • 15 SOUTH GRADY WAY • RENTON, WASHINGTON 98055 FAX (206) 235-8007 October 28, 1991 Mr. Don Erickson City of Renton Planning Division - p<�€l�ilE - 110 200 Mill Avenue South �''�)/ 0�r1" Renton, WA 98055 �`�/0-, 4f OCT ION RE: Village Place North Parking Garage 79� Revised Drawing Dear Don, Per our recent meeting, enclosed are a revised site plan and a rough blue line of the revised parking garage. Per our conversation, the garage has been reduced in size so that the entire garage can be utilized. Originally, 20% of the garage was to be held in reserve and could have been utilized in the future for a future project or if we could show a need for the additional parking. The close proximity of this project to the Grady Way Park & Ride Lot and a Transportation Management Plan in effect helps reduce the need for the additional parking space at this location. If some sort of commitment is required ( i.e. , letter of credit, etc. ) to show that the garage could be expanded to accommodate the 20% additional parking, we would be more than happy to oblige. Please review and advise us of any questions you may have regarding this. Thank you for your cooperation and assistance on this project. Sincerely, Xtt,--4"(- Loren Laskow (orn) Executive Vice President Enclosures LL/lm • wr.\ • 46 • • . _ „„„ AUCwsr 2, /99/ - 7•/ p.y. 4 Auws jy 2/, /`l9/ - 7:SO P.. ArrsurniE EKP.f.Ess 1IL A//J6 --WESTERNAVE.- sic. a 11 T , ! AC)6UST , /9* - 6:s7 a.„. /RZZO1CNE. L 1 E SS 130/1.2)/A/6 --WESTE7eAl AVE-SF4ME sA-078- 10 RENTON VILLAGE M -_ JAGEMENT CORPORATI _ V (206) 228-3000 EVERGREEN BUILDING • SUITE 240 • 15 SOUTH GRADY WAY • RENTON, WASHINGTON 98055 FAX (206) 235-8007 October 28, 1991 "%aV Clr'®F RENTON Mr. Don Erickson °CT 2 8 1997 City of Renton Planning Division REclenD 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 RE: Village Place North Parking Garage Revised Drawing Dear Don, Per our recent meeting, enclosed are a revised site plan and a rough blue line of the revised parking garage. Per our conversation, the garage has been reduced in size so that the entire garage can be utilized. Originally, 20% of the garage was to be held in reserve and could have been utilized in the future for a future project or if we could show a need for the additional parking. The close proximity of this project to the Grady Way Park & Ride Lot and a Transportation Management Plan in effect helps reduce the need for the additional parking space at this location. If some sort of commitment is required ( i.e. , letter of credit, etc. ) to show that the garage could be expanded to accommodate the 20% additional parking, we would be more than happy to oblige. Please review and advise us of any questions you may have regarding this. Thank you for your cooperation and assistance on this project. Sincerely, /04f-4'c 1/43,46-10- Loren Laskow ( rn) Executive Vice President Enclosures LL/lm SAS -0-7 • 61 ?CO-4 CITY F RENTON "LL Planning/Building/Public Works Department Earl Clymer, Mayor Lynn Guttmann,Administrator August 5, 1991 Brian Cloepfill Callison Partnership 1420 Fifth Avenue Suite 2400 Seattle,Washington 98101 RE:Village Place North (078-90) Dear Mr. Cloepfill: I am writing to respond to your correspondence of August 1st concerning plans for mitigation of glare impacts on the north facade of the planned office building for Village Place North. Our opinion remains that in order to fully consider the effectiveness of the proposed curved plates,a fully detailed glare diagram will be required. Our request for this diagram is based upon previous experiences which have been encountered with the use of the curved glass designs similar to those which you ' describe. These often create dispersed reflection patterns over a greater area and with a greater visual impact (Park Hilton Hotel, Seattle)than flat glass, resulting in greater visual distraction. This is a result of the fact that more sunlight is being reflected in multiple directions at any one point in time,,whereas with - parallel panes,the sun's rays only get reflected in one direction, based upon the angle of incidence. (See attached diagram). When we have received the above-described glare diagram,we will consider your plan for glare mitigation through the use of curved glass. If you would like additional information, please contact me at 235-2550. Si rely, Donald K. Erickson,AICP Principal Planner 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 -., -.,... -.. • N \ - \ -,1 CY .1 • • (.)• av,,'" ...._ ../ 1 / ------_____-7------- _.---.• _______--- • El .... 1 -4 ,-------- -----,,p5,0P PA1L-r. ,0,.. ------------------„____:„...:. .,, . z.;." ...._ .. r ' r - June 24. 1991 Renton City Council Minutes Page 224 Mr. Morgan noted that his organization would welcome an opportunity to meet with City representatives to define and resolve issues of mutual interest. He also requested assistance from the City in obtaining resource material for the purpose of providing information regarding incorporation and annexation to the Newport Hills community. MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY MATHEWS, COUNCIL REFER THIS MATTER TO THE ADMINISTRATION. CARRIED. Garbage: Hazardous Correspondence was read from Planning/Building/Public Works Administrator Wastemobile Collection Lynn Guttmann reporting that 1) The King County household hazardous wastemobile was located at the Renton Center mall 5/2/91 through 5/11/91. 2) This event was advertised through posters in the public library, a utility billing insert, the City's cable channel, and the Mill Avenue Messenger newsletter. 3) Forty-five tons of hazardous waste were collected and 370 55-gallon drums were filled. OLD BUSINESS Councilman Tanner stated that newspaper articles stated the names of Appeal: Renton Village councilmembers who voted against the 6/17/91 Planning and Development Center (Renton Village Committee report and recommendation on the Renton Village Center/South Associates), South Grady Grady Way site plan and conditional use permit issue, and that citizens have Way, (SA, CU-078-90) contacted him to ask why he did not vote against this issue. Mr. Tanner requested that the record indicate that he was not present at the 6/17/91 Council meeting, and requested that newspaper articles include such information in the future. Councilman Stredicke noted that he voted against the issue because the recommendations did not require restrictive covenants to ensure that the campus will be fully integrated with landscaping, pedestrian pathways, and handicap access. Councilwoman Mathews responded that the Committee had required that specific plans be submitted to Council for review to ensure that conditions are met. Public Works: Councilman Tanner noted that the Council minutes of 6/17/91, Page 210, Comprehensive Sewer Item 6, stated that the proposed rate increases for the Comprehensive Sewer System Plan System.Plan are the minimum necessary to implement the City-funded portion of the improvements. He pointed out that there are at least two other plans that have been developed by RH2 Engineering that indicate the improvements can be financed in a number of different ways by changing the proposed Comprehensive Sewer System Plan parameters. Utilities Committee Referred 6/3/91 - Utilities Committee Chairman Keolker-Wheeler presented Utility: Department of a report stating that the Committee recommended that the Solid Waste Utility Ecology Coordinated Division apply for the total allocation of the Department of Ecology Prevention Grant Coordinated Prevention Grant funds available to the City. The Committee Funding further recommended that the Mayor be authorized to sign a letter of intent to apply for the funds addressed to the King County Solid Waste Division administrator of the grant application process. MOVED BY KEOLKER- WHEELER, SECONDED BY TANNER, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Streets: Maintenance Councilman Stredicke stated that a 30-foot-wide strip of City-owned City-Owned Property, property adjacent to residential property located at NE 5th Street and NE 5th & Edmonds Edmonds Avenue NE has not been maintained. Mayor Clymer advised that Avenue NE due to budget constraints, City maintenance service has been implemented only when sight obstruction exists. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY NELSON, COUNCIL REFER THIS MATTER TO THE WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE. CARRIED. Community Services Community Services Committee Vice-Chairman Stredicke presented a report Committee , stating that the Committee reviewed the funding request submitted by CAG: 84-030, Domestic Domestic Abuse Women's Network (DAWN) for $15,000 to be applied to the Abuse Women's Network purchase of an emergency shelter for victims of domestic violence. (DAWN) Shelter Project Funding Request The Committee recommended that: 1) The request be referred to the Human Services Advisory Committee for review and recommendation; and 2) The request be referred to the Administration to determine the availability of funds. ro- CITY OF RENTON ' Finance Department Earl Clymer, Mayor June 19, 1991 Mr. Thomas A. Goeltz Davis Wright Tremaine 1501 Fourth Avenue Seattle, WA 98101-1688 Re: Renton Village Associates Appeal of Decision by Hearing Examiner, File No. SA- 078-90, Site Plan Approval and Conditional Use Permit. Dear Mr. Goeltz: At the Council meeting of 6/17/91, the Renton City Council adopted the recommendation of the Planning and Development Committee to approve the referenced conditional use permit and site plan conditioned upon the applicant's compliance with the conditions imposed by the Environmental Review Committee, the non-appealed conditions of the hearing examiner, and the conditions set forth in the Planning and Development Committee report. A copy of the report is attached for your information. Please note the hand-written note on Condition No. 1, page 3, requiring the applicant to record a covenant to dedicate a right-of-way so that the city may use Lake Avenue as a city street at a later date. Please feel free to contact this office if further information is desired. Sincerely, id2)/ ,..k/i> Marilyn e,d'-rsen, CMC City Clerk 235-2502 cc: Mayor Earl Clymer Council President Toni Nelson Lenora Blauman, Senior Planner Renton Village Associates • 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 June 17. 1991 Renton City Council Minutes Pane 215 In response to Council inquiries, Councilman Edwards said that the proposal included a refund policy. He responded further that currently the City covers 60 percent of land use costs, and this proposal would reduce the City's cost to 40 percent with the developer covering the remaining 60 percent. Ms. Guttmann advised that the concept was previously approved by Council, but the ordinance was held until interested parties had an opportunity to offer input. *MOTION CARRIED. Appeal: Renton Village Referred 4/22/91 - Planning and Development Committee Chairman Center (Renton Village Mathews presented a report regarding the appeal filed by the Renton Village Associates), South Grady Associates regarding the Renton Village Center/South Grady Way site plan Way, (SA, CIL:228-__Laca and conditional use permit Hearing Examiner's decision dated 3/5/91 which includes the following projects: 1) 260,363 square feet office/retail sales; 10 stories/133 feet; 2) Six level parking garage; and 3) Renovation of existing retail area. The Committee met on 5/16/91, 5/23/91, and 6/6/91 to consider the appeal of the applicant, and recalled that this applicant came before the Council in 1988 for the purpose of building the Renton Village Theater. At that time, I the hearing examiner had required a road. The Council found that the requirement of a road was premature. The Council required a covenant to install a road upon the next application for site plan approval (9/19/88, SA- 103-87); and the applicant complied. The current appeal focuses on: A) Flooding: Storage of flood waters on the ground floor of the . garage. Regional flooding problems. B) Ten-Story Building: View blockage and traffic Flooding: The Committee found the following errors of findings and conclusions. The Hearing Examiner concluded (Conclusion No. 28) that "the flooding problem increases the potential for injury both to personal property and to persons." (Conclusion No. 30) "...utilizing the lower level of the public - garage reintroduces the potential for injury." The applicant's proposal "does nothing about the existing situation" (Conclusion No. 14). "The current level of flooding would not be modified..." (Finding No. 33). • The Committee found, based on staff opinion, that the installation of a 72" drainage pipe to redirect the flooding to the Panther Creek Wetlands will have a favorable impact on flooding on this site. Further, the Committee found that storage of flood waters would not unduly jeopardize the safety of the public due to infrequency, and the proposed signage for the parking garage. The applicant has stipulated that if paid parking is approved by the City - Council and is instituted in the garage and parking on the ground floor is precluded by flooding, there will be a commensurate number of stalls provided on the top parking level of the garage made available as free parking. The applicant has agreed to provide a covenant to the City regarding the resolution of the regional flooding problems. The applicant will agree to participate in an Local Improvement District (LID) (or other funding mechanism) or the determination of their fair share of said LID (or other funding mechanism). Ten-Story Building: 'The Committee found that the City does.not currently have a view ordinance and that the square footage of the proposed building in the proposed configuration is less of a blight on views to the residents than a lower and more squat building(s) for which no conditional use permit would be required. The applicant has stipulated that they are consuming some of their densities despite the fact that the proposed building covers less square footage than a squat building would cover. Further, the applicant has stipulated that there will not be development of another building of this magnitude on this campus. The conditions of the Environmental Review -Committee (ERC) are still in place, and with those conditions being met, this building at this location is appropriate. The Committee found that the Hearing Examiner's conclusion that the proposed building is more appropriate for the central business district (CBD) is in error. . June 17. 1991 Renton City Council Minutes Paae 216 The Committee found that the Hearing Examiner's Conclusion No. 2 is in error or at least is unclear. There is no evidence in the record that the extra three stories on the office building will generate 15 to 20 percent more traffic to the area. It is noted that the Hearing Examiner's Conclusion No. 8 states that staff indicated the entire proposal would only add approximately 4 percent to the traffic in the area. The Committee has reconciled these two conclusions by reasoning that the extra three stories will on add 15 to 20 percent of the 4 percent, that is less than a 1 percent increase in traffic in the area attributable to the extra three stories. Further, the Hearing Examiner's Conclusion No. 23 that traffic congestion will only be exacerbated by .this development is misleading. The applicant could design a more squat building for which no conditional use permit is ' required, and have the same traffic impacts. To require a lower building based on 1 percent traffic impact, which would still exist with a more squat j building, is,an error. The Committee also discussed the following with the applicant: 1) Improvements made 'to Lake Avenue may be made to full City standards. Full width of the street is permissible at this time. Also, the applicant may install speed bumps and signing for controls. The Committee recognizes that Lake should not be used as a thoroughfare or alternate traffic route at this time. The applicant shall record a covenant to dedicate a right-of-way so that the City may use Lake as a City street at a later date. 2) The Committee has insisted that it be a fully integrated campus with landscaping, pathways, and raised walkways. There must be easy access throughout the site for all users. '+ 3) The Committee wants to insure handicap-accessible and pedestrian- , friendly linkage throughout the site. 4) The applicant stipulated that its contribution to the transportation benefit zone (TBZ) in the amount of $440,000.00 plus shall not revert back to the applicant if not spent by the City within six years. The applicant stipulated that it waives any claim for reimbursement of those funds. 5) Twenty percent of the parking in the parking garage is in reserve at the City's request. 6) This site must be made compatible and user-friendly with the Talbot Hill neighborhood and the Park and Ride located on Grady Way. There must be pedestrian signalization across Grady. 7) The plan for pedestrian circulation on the site must be submitted to the Council committee for input. The Committee recommended that the Council approve the conditional use permit and the site plan conditioned upon the applicant's compliance with the ERC conditions, the non-appealed conditions of the Hearing Examiner, and the conditions set forth in this report. MOVED BY MATHEWS, SECONDED BY EDWARDS, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT AS AMENDED. CARRIED. Council members made the following inquiries: 1) Were Talbot Hill residents involved in the meetings? 2) Is the proposed drainage pipe located below the residential area? 3) Has analysis been done as to how the wetlands will change? 4) Will the developer be responsible for making the site "user friendly?" Councilwoman Mathews responded that: 1) Residents attended the meetings and expressed their concerns regarding view obstruction and increased traffic. 2) The drainage pipe goes underneath I-405 into the Panther Creek Wetlands along SR-167. 3) City staff is studying the drainage basin but since plans for the area have not been completed, the Committee report stipulates that the applicant will covenant to participate in future drainage solutions. 4) Installation of pedestrian crossings, Park and Ride accommodations, handicap access, etc. are conditions of approval. *MOTION CARRIED. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS Ways & Means Ways and Means Committee Chairman Stredicke presented the following Committee ordinances for second and final reading: APP!WVEE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE COMMITTEE REPORT June 17 , .1991 • Renton Village Appeal - Site Plan and Conditional Use Permit (SA, CU-078-90) (Referred 4/22/91) Date of Hearing Examiner' s Decision: March 5, 1991 . Subject Property: Renton Village Center/South Grady Way. Subject Proposal : 1 . 260, 363 sq. ft . office/retail sales 10 stories/133 ft. 2 . 6 level parking garage. 3 . Renovation of existing retail area. SA, CU-078-90 The Planning and Development Committee met on May 16, 1991, May 23, 1991 and June 6, 1991 to consider the appeal of the applicant and recalled that this applicant came before the council in 1988 for the purpose of building the Renton Village Theater. At that time the hearing examiner had required a road. The council found that the requirement of a road was premature. The council required a covenant to install a road upon the next application for site plan approval ( September 19 , 1988 SA 103-87 ) . The applicant complied. The current appeal focuses on: A. Flooding: Storage of flood waters on the ground floor of the garage. Regional flooding problems . B. 10-Story Building: View blockage and traffic . A. Flooding. The committee finds the following errors of findings and conclusions . The hearing examiner concludes (Conclusion No. 28) that "the flooding problem increases the potential for injury both to personal property and to persons . " (Conclusion No. 30) . . . "utilizing the lower level of the public garage reintroduces the potential for injury. " The applicant' s proposal "does nothing about the existing situation. " (Conclusion No. 14) . "The current level of flooding would not. be modified. . . " (Finding No. 33 ) . The committee finds, based on staff opinion, that the installation of a 72 'i drainage pipe to redirect the flooding to the Panther Creek Wetlands will have a favorable impact on flooding on this site . Further, the committee finds that storage of flood waters would not Copies : Jim Hanson Don Erickson Lenora Blauman (See change on page 3) • 1 a Planning and Develoi�,ant Committee Report - 2 unduly jeopardize the safety of the public due to infrequency, and the proposed signage for the parking garage. The applicant has stipulated that if paid parking is approved by the city council and is instituted in the garage and parking on the ground floor is precluded by flooding, there will be a commensurate number of stalls provided on the top parking level of the garage made available as free parking. The applicant has agreed to provide a covenant to the city regarding the resolution of the regional flooding problems . The applicant will agree to participate in an LID (or other funding mechanism) .and further agree not to protest the formation of such an LID (or other funding mechanism) or the determination of their fair share of said LID (or other funding mechanism) . B. 10-Story Building. The committee finds that the city does not. currently have a view ordinance and that the square footage of the proposed building in the proposed configuration is _ less of a blight on views to the residents than a lower and more squat building(s ) for which no conditional use permit would be required. The applicant has stipulated that they are consuming some of, their densities despite the fact that the proposed building covers less square footage than a squat building would cover. Further, the applicant has stipulated that there will not be development of another building of this magnitude on this campus . The conditions of the ERC are still in place, and with those conditions being met, this building at this location is appropriate. The committee finds that the hearing examiner' s conclusion that the proposed building is more appropriate for the CBD is in error. The committee finds the hearing examiner' s Conclusion No. 2 is in error, or at the least is unclear. There is no evidence in the record that the extra 3 stories on the office building will generate 15 to 20 percent more traffic to the area. It is noted that the hearing examiner's Conclusion No. 8 states that staff indicated the entire proposal would only add approximately 4 percent to the traffic in the area. The committee has reconciled these two conclusions by reasoning that the extra 3 stories will only add 15 to 20 percent of the 4 percent. That is less than a 1 percent increase in traffic in the area attributable to the extra 3 stories . Further, the hearing examiner's Conclusion No.23 that traffic congestion will only be exacerbated by this development is misleading. The applicant could design a more squat building, for which no conditional use permit is required, and have the same traffic impacts . To require a lower building based on 1 percent traffic impact, which would still exist with a more squat building, is an error. The committee also discussed with the applicant the following: R Planning and Develo_ ._ nt Committee Report - 3 1 . Improvements made to Lake may be made to full city standards . Full width of the street is permissible at this time. Also, the applicant may install speed bumps and signing for controls . The committee recognizes that Lake should not be used as a thoroughfare or alternate traffic route at this time. The applicant .mustAdedicate a right-of-way so that the city may use Lake a city street at a later date. sect--c5(Gz tb 2 . the committee has insisted that it be a fully integrated campus with landscaping, pathways and raised walkways . There must be easy access throughout the site for all users . 3 . The committee wants to insure handicap accessible and pedestrian-friendly linkage throughout the site. 4 . The applicant stipulated that its contribution to the TBZ in the amount of $440, 000 . 00+ shall not revert back to the applicant if not spent by the city within 6 years . The applicant stipulated) that it waives any claim for reimbursement of those funds . 5 . 20 percent of the parking in the parking garage is in reserve, at the city' s request. 6 . This site must be made compatible and user-friendly with the Talbot Hill neighborhood and the Park and Ride located on Grady Way. There must be pedestrian signalization across Grady. 7 . The plan for pedestrian circulation on the site must be submitted to the council committee for input. The committee recommends that the council approve the conditional use permit and the site plan conditioned upon the applicant' s compliance with the ERC conditions, the non-appealed conditions of the hearing examiner, and the conditions set forth in this report. Nancy Mathews, Chair -z?C-f Bob Edwards, Vice-Chair Lt / J ,- �3k� Kathy KJolker-Wheeler, Member ZLF: as . CITY9 : 3 . June 10. 1991 Renton City Council Minutes Page 201 Parks: Junior Golf Referred 6/3/91 - Community Services Committee Chairman Tanner Program, Maplewood presented a report stating that the Committee recommended approval of the Golf Course proposed junior golfing rates, which will be the same as the rate for seniors, Monday through Friday only. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY EDWARDS TO CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Transportation: Six-Year Referred 6/3/91 - Transportation (Aviation) Committee Chairman Edwards Transportation presented a report stating the Committee recommended that the scope of the Improvement Program, Lake Washington Boulevard - North Park Drive to NE 44th Street Bike/Trail 1992-1997 Project be expanded to include roadway rehabilitation, and concurred in the staff recommendation that $75,000 of carryover funds be allocated for preliminary design of the rehabilitation and bike/pedestrian trail. The scope of the project shall not include expansion of the number of automobile traffic lanes beyond the one existing lane in each direction. The Committee further recommended that the $75,000 for the Lake Washington Boulevard project be transferred from the Park Avenue North - Bronson to North 10th project account and that the Park Avenue North project be allocated $75,000 of vehicle registration fee funds which would come to the City in•1991. The Committee further recommended referral to the Ways and Means Committee for the proper budget adjustments. MOVED BY EDWARDS, SECONDED BY STREDICKE, TO CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Planning: Truck Route MOVED BY EDWARDS, SECONDED BY STREDICKE, COUNCIL SET A Ordinance PUBLIC HEARING ON A PROPOSED TRUCK ROUTE ORDINANCE FOR 7/15/91. CARRIED. Appeal: Renton Village Councilwoman Mathews reported that the Planning and Development Center (Renton Village Committee has concluded the appeal hearing on Renton Village Associates, Associates), South Grady and a report on this matter will be presented to Council on 6/17/91. Way, (SA, CU-078-90) • ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS, Ways & Means Ways and Means Committee Chairman Stredicke presented a Committee Committee report recommending the following ordinances for second and final reading: Ordinance #4313 An ordinance was read amending Ordinance No. 3856 adopted by the City LID: 329, South 43rd Council October 22, 1984, as amended by Ordinance No. 4074 adopted by the Street Improvements, R. City Council on June 15, 1987, as amended by ordinance No. 4180 adopted W. Scott by the City Council on October 10, 1988, by expanding the improvements authorized in those ordinances and including those improvements within those permitted under LID No. 329. Improvements to include: 1) Widening of South 43rd Street between SR-167 northbound ramps and Talbot Road South on both sides. 2) Construction of a tunnel between SR-167 northbound ramps and Davis Avenue South under South 43rd Street to connect the Valley Medical Center properties, including construction of an approach road on the South side connecting to Davis Avenue South and reconstructing portions of existing roads on the north side. 3) Installation of new curbs, gutters, sidewalks, curb ramps, and driveways. 4) Provision of asphalt overlay of existing streets; 5) Adjustment and restoration of existing abutting property features. 6) Adjustment of existing manholes, utility castings, monuments, etc., to new pavement grade; 7) Abandonment of existing and construct new drainage facilities. 8) Relocation of existing hydrants and water meters where roadway widening occurs. 9) Relocation of affected private utilities. 10) Structural design for tunnel and retaining walls; 11) Installation of new traffic signal hardware on South 43rd Street at intersections with SR-167 northbound ramps and Talbot Road South. 12) Relocation of existing metal street light poles and lights on new foundations; add new foundations, poles, and lights; and install new underground conduit. 13) Installation of new pavement markings, channelization, and signing throughout the project. 14) Provision of telemetry conduit through the project area. 15) Provision of new sanitary sewer line to bypass the tunnel and its south approach road. 16) Provision of tunnel lighting, new electrical service to Valley Medical Center, and relocate parking area lighting as necessary. 17) Rerouting and reconnection of the Valley Medical Center drainage line caused by the lowering of the north approach roads to the tunnel. 18) Provision of new water service connection to Valley Medical Center. June 3. 1991 Renton City Council Minutes Page 189 Mr. McCaffrey also commended the management efforts of Charlie Stewart, concessionaire, and recommended that Mr. Stewart's contract be extended until the new club house, driving range, and planned revision of the golf course are completed. (See prior action.) Citizen Comment: Correspondence was entered from Michael W. Richards in support of the Richards - Appeal, Renton Village Associates redevelopment of the Renton Village Shopping Renton Village Center, Center and the addition of a ten story office complex, South Grady Way (SA, South Grady Way (SA, CU-078-90). Mr. Richards observed that the office complex in the shopping CU-078-90) center would be close to other commercial office buildings and the freeway system, and have a minimal impact on the City of Renton. He stated further that restrictions placed on this project to solve area flooding and to reduce building size to mitigate traffic are inappropriate since these are City-wide issues and not the responsibility of an individual project. Mr. Richards suggested that the City work with citizens and businesses on an area-wide plan that would address traffic and flooding issues. OLD BUSINESS Referred 5/20/91 - Public Safety Committee Chairman Zimmerman presented Public Safety Committee a Committee report stating that the Committee met on 5/29/91 to consider a CAG: 91-058, Interlocal resolution to authorize Mayor Clymer to sign an Interagency Joint Purchasing Purchase Agreement, Agreement with the City of Seattle for a two-way 800-megahertz radio Trunked 800-Megahertz communication system. The City of Seattle, together with a group of eastside Radio System cities and King County, are proposing the creation of a regional two-way radio and microwave system for emergency communications. The purpose of this Agreement is to provide the City of Renton with the ability, if they should so choose, to be part of this regional radio communication system and purchase equipment under the terms and conditions outlined in the request for a proposal prepared by the City of Seattle, which has set 6/4/91 as the deadline for receiving the signed agreements. Therefore, the Committee recommended that the Council refer the matter of the resolution to the Ways & Means Committee for consideration on 6/3/91. (See later action.) MOVED BY ZIMMERMAN, SECONDED BY TANNER, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Community Services Referred 5/13/91 - Community Services Committee Chairman Tanner Committee presented a report stating that the Committee met on 5/21/91 to review the H&HS: 1991 Community staffs recommendations regarding 1991 Community Development Block Development Block Grant Grant (CDBG) funds allocated to the King County Housing Opportunity Funds (YWCA) Fund. The allocation is intended as a local match to leverage the County fund for the development of housing. The Council adopted the 1991 CBDG program and Contingency plan with the matching funds designated, in part, to the YWCA South County Transitional Shelter for Domestic Violence Victims. The plan recommended additional funding for the YWCA project contingent upon the successful implementation of other CDBG funded activities, with a portion left undesignated. Since the Housing Opportunity Fund requires proportionate leveraging of City funds as a condition of serving City residents, designating the entire amount of $28,966.00 to the YWCA Transitional Shelter project will enable more Renton residents to be served. After review, the Committee recommended Council concurrence. MOVED BY TANNER, SECONDED BY EDWARDS, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT AND REFER THIS MATTER TO THE WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE. CARRIED.. PUD: Emergency Access Councilwoman Keolker-Wheeler reported that the emergency access road at Victoria Hills, FPUD- the Victoria Hills apartment complex does not have a gate or barrier to 042-85 prevent access for traffic in and out of the complex, and requested that the Administration investigate this situation and report baek to Council. Garbage: Renton Spring A report was read from Planning/Building/Public Works Administrator Lynn Clean and Recycle Day, Guttmann stating that the Renton Spring Clean and Recycle Day held on 5/18/91 Saturday, 5/18/91, and coordinated by the Solid Waste Utility Division was successful. The result of the event was the collection of 900+ tires, 132 lead acid batteries, 23.52 tons of scrap metal and appliances, .2 tons of plastics (HDPE and PET), 15 litter bags full of LDPE plastic bags, reuseable household goods, and 1.27 tons of non-recyclable garbage. This event diverted over 26 tons of material from the landfill. Councilwoman Keolker- Wheeler expressed appreciation for the efforts of staff, industry, and residents in making this event a success. ,.3U.e,ata G/3(11 EC BV ® MAY 2 3 1991 RENTON Gil ' GULAC,L. May 15 , 1991 The Planning & Development Committee City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton , WA 98055 RE: Renton Village Associates SA, .CU-078-90 Dear Council Members : I write this letter to encourage 'your support of the redevelopment of Renton Village Shopping Center and the addition of the ten (10) story office complex at Renton Village . This development will draw attention not only' to the Renton Village complex , the surrounding businesses , but also to the retail area in downtown Renton. The ten (10Y story building belongs in this area because of its close proximity to other commercial office buildings , the freeway system and its interchange . This location is ideal for the office growth of Renton with minimal impact . The restrictions that have been placed on this project to solve area flooding and reduce the building size to mitigate traffic are not appropriate in light of the mitigations that Renton Village Associates have extensively negotiated and agreed to with the City. Both restrictions are city wide issues that should be solved by the City with an area-wide plan in conjunction with its ' citizens and businesses . Individuals cannot solve those problems . An individual project should not have to be burdened by an area-wide problem. Furthermore , downsizing only increases sprawl , something we all agree is not in the City' s interest . I strongly urge you to support this project as proposed . Sincerely, Michael W. Richards MWR:clm / e. May 20, 1991 Renton City Council Minutes Page 178 Legal: City Code of Administrative Services Department/City Clerk requested revision of the Ethics Revision, Code of Ethics, submission deadline for Statement of Expense for Candidates, Statement of Expense for to conform to the State Public Disclosure Commission submission deadline, Candidates and Tequire a duplicate of the completed State public disclosure form to be filed with the City in lieu of the existing City form. Refer to Ways and Means Committee. Police: Interlocal Purchase Police Department requested interlocal purchase agreement with Seattle for a Agreement, Trunked 800- trunked 800 megahertz radio system to be integrated into a regional King Megahertz Radio System County system. Refer to Ws-and Co-„ itt Y..)o c. S�leX.i e ow.. JdCele_.• . Acquisition: Purchase of Technical Services requested authorization to purchase one-foot strip of land Strip of Land, South 37th along South 37th Street between Shattuck Avenue South and Talbot Road Street South to ensure future widening of South 37th Street, to bring roadway up to City standards, and for future extension of utilities within the street right of way; cost $1,000. Refer to Ways and Means Committee. Streets: Benson Road Transportation Division requested authorization to proceed with condemnation Widening, Victoria Hills, proceeding for easement for rockery located at the southwest margin of the FPUD-042-85 Benson condominium property and to pay funds for condemnation award; fiscal impact $3,500 (to be reimbursed by developer). Refer to Transportation (Aviation) Committee. Utility: Special Utility Utility Division requested revision of City Code 8-4-41 (B3) and 8-5-17 Connection Charge (B3), Special Utility Connection Charge for water and sewer special utility Revision connection charge. Refer to Utilities Committee. Finance: Employee Administrative Services Department requested adoption of resolution Pharmaceutical Plan, establishing a letter of credit in the amount of $11,000 to guarantee payment Healthcare Management, of prescription charges through the City's new pharmaceutical plan with Inc. Healthcare Management, Inc. Refer to Ways and Means Committee. (See later action.) MOVED BY NELSON, SECONDED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, COUNCIL ADOPT THE CONSENT AGENDA AS PRESENTED. CARRIED. INFORMATION ITEM City Clerk submitted 1991 King County election information (assignment of King County: 1991 Council positions, information on candidacy filing, and candidates' workshop Election Candidate Filing information). King County Records and Elections Division has established Information candidate filing period from 7/22-7/26/91. Streets: Grant Transportation Division submitted grant applications for SR-167/SW 43rd Applications for SR- loop ramp and Oakesdale Avenue SW, SW 16th to SW 31st projects to the 167/SW 43rd Loop & State Transportation Improvement Board. Oakesdale Avenue SW, SW 16th to SW 31st CORRESPONDENCE Correspondence was entered in support of redevelopment and addition of ten Appeal: Renton Village story office building to the Renton Village Shopping Center complex, South Center, South Grady Way Grady Way, from Gary R. Schwartz, 2805 Mt. View Avenue North; Tom (SA, CU-078-90) Merz, 2133 Edmonds Avenue NE; Joseph Redburn, 923 South 28th Court; Diamond Lil's Restaurant, 321 Rainier Avenue; Evana Flynn (no address); Stanley A. Ridley, Jr., 908 Lynnwood Avenue NE; and Jack L. Cawan, 911 Lynnwood Avenue NE. Correspondence was entered from Ina Woodin, 3901 Park Avenue North, Renton, regarding the Renton Village Center which included the following inquiries: 1) If only four percent more traffic will be generated, why is a five-story garage being built? 2) Why not build on the west corner of the property to avoid obstruction of views? 3) How far will $380,000 go toward new road or other construction? 4) What will happen to parking for those shopping at the Center? Will they I be forced to pay for parking? 5) Has the building height of ten-stories been denied? Councilwoman Keolker-Wheeler requested that copies of these letters be forwarded to Planning and Development Committee members. •A • ED - f' Y 1 5 1991 May 9, 1991 RENTON CI I Y COUNCIL The Planning and Development Committee City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 Re: Renton Village Associates SA, CU-078-90 Dear Council Members: I would like to encourage your support of Renton Village Associates proposals far redevelopment of Renton Village Shopping Center and Village Place North. Both proposals represent the best interests of Renton's residential and commercial communities. Approval of the redevelopment plan for this aging shopping center will enhance the image of Renton and add to the revitalization of Renton's central commercial district. The City of Renton has an obligation to provide convenient and attractive neighborhood services for area residents. Please encourage reinvestment in our community. Village Place North (10 story office) is also a welcome addition to Renton and should be approved for construction. Renton Village Associates have been cooperative in recognizing and mitigating traffic and drainage problems. However, responsibility for the total remediation of these problems should not rest with Renton Village Associates alone. Traffic and drainage issues raised by the Examiner are largely the result of off-site rather than on-site problems. ,I am not aware of a better location within Renton for• this proposal. The changes brought on by redevelopment and addition of these buildings to the community will be positive. City of Renton should approve these plans and centralize new development at transportation nodes. Metro Park and Ride is across the street and a freeway interchange is right next door. Ultimately, taxpayer costs for new infrastructure will be reduced and the integrity of our nearby residential communities will be preserved. These are worthy proposals benefitting the entire community. I urge your support. Sincerely, Gary R, Schwartz 2805 Mt. View Ave. do. Renton, WA 98056 MAY 1 5 1991 May 14, 1991 i;i:NON CITY C.. .,..,,� {L The Planning and Development Committee City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 RE: Renton Village Associates SA, CU-078-90 Dear Council Members: As a resident of Renton, I wish to encourage the City Council to support the redevelopment of Renton Village Shopping Center and the addition of a ten story office building to the complex at Renton Village. This development will bring favorable attention to our city and the downtown area of this city. The downtown retailers should attract a significant portion of the individuals working in these office buildings. Their new purchasing power should lead to the much needed redevelopment of the downtown area. Office buildings of this type are best suited, as proposed by the developers, near access points to the freeway system. Its size and location lessens urban sprawl and traffic congestions, keeping commuters out of the downtown retail area for shoppers. Let's keep quality office buildings in those locations that already have large buildings and are designed to accommodate more. Sincerely, • 0a--7 Tom Merz 2133 Edmonds Ave NE Renton, WA 98056 • � .�VED MAY 1 5 1991 RENTON CITY COUNCIL May 9, 1991 The Planning and Development Committee City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 Dear Council Members: I support the 10 story office building and shopping center redevelopment at Renton Village. It is the right project at the right location. It is near the freeway on ramps so traffic clears out fast to reduce congestion. It also keeps office buildings together, reducing sprawl and congestion and keeps commuters out of downtown so it's easier for shoppers to spend time downtown. ry truly your , seph Redburn 923 South 28th Ct. Renton, WA 98055 RECE VEE, MAY 2 0 1991 RENTON CITY COUNCIL May 9, 1991 The Planning & Development Committee City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 RE: Renton Village Associates SA, CU-078-90 Dear Council Members: I write this letter to encourage your support of the redevelopment of Renton Village Shopping Center and the addition of the ten (10) story office complex at Renton Village. This development will draw attention not only to the Renton Village complex, the surrounding businesses, but also to the retail area in downtown Renton. The ten (10) story building belongs in this area because of its close proximity to other commercial office buildings, the freeway system and its interchange. This location is ideal for the office growth of Renton with minimal impact. The restrictions that have been placed on this project to solve area flooding and reduce the building size to mitigate traffic are not appropriate in light of the mitigations that Renton Village Associates have extensively negotiated and agreed to with the City. Both restrictions are city wide issues that should be solved by the City with an area-wide plan in conjunction with its' citizens and businesses. Individuals cannot solve those problems. An individual project should not have to be burdened by an area-wide problem. Furthermore, down- sizing only increases sprawl, something we all agree is not in the City' s interest. I strongly urge you support t is project as proposed. Sincerely, ‘,//,j? Dh9M-t0ntO k 1 L.s 321 Ra i-n i'er Avenue Renton, WA 98055 RE.CE VE MAY 2 O 1991 RENTON Cii Y COUNCIL May 9, 1991 The Planning & Development Committee City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 RE: Renton Village Associates SA, CU-078-90 Dear Council Members: As a resident of Renton, I wish to urge the City Council to support the redevelopment of Renton Village Shopping Center and the addition of a ten (10) story office building to the complex at Renton Village. This development will bring favorable attention to our city and the downtown area of this city. The downtown retailers should attract a significant portion of the individuals working in these office buildings; their new purchasing power should lead to the much needed redevelopment of the downtown area. Office buildings of this type are best suited, as proposed by the developers, near access points to the freeway system. Its size and location lessens urban sprawl and traffic congestions, keeping commuters out of the downtown retail area for shoppers. Let' s keep quality office buildings in those locations that already have large buildings and are designed to accommodate more. Sincerely, 4/171/1242-) `. MAY 201991 I EKoN (i I Y UUuNOIL May 9, 1991 The Planning & Development Committee City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 RE: Renton Village Associates SA, CU-078-90 Dear Council Members: As a resident of Renton, I wish to urge the City Council to support the redevelopment of Renton Village Shopping Center and the addition of a ten (10) story office building to the complex at Renton Village. This development will bring favorable attention to our city and the downtown area of this city. The downtown retailers should attract a significant portion of the individuals working in these office buildings; their new purchasing power should lead to the much needed redevelopment of the downtown area. Office buildings of this type are best suited, as proposed by the developers, near access points to the freeway system. Its size and location lessens urban sprawl and traffic congestions, keeping commuters out of the downtown retail area for shoppers. Let' s keep quality office buildings in those locations that already have large buildings and are designed to accommodate more. Sincere y, 908 Lynnwood Ave, NE. Renton, WA 98056 , May 9, 1991 The Planning & Development Committee City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 RE: Renton Village Associates SA, CU-078-90 Dear Council Members: As a resident of Renton, I wish to urge the City Council to support the redevelopment of Renton Village Shopping Center and the addition of a ten (10) story office building to the complex at Renton Village. , This development will bring favorable attention to our city and the downtown area of this city. The downtown retailers should attract a significant portion of the individuals working in these office buildings; their new purchasing power should lead to the much needed redevelopment of the downtown area. Office buildings of this type are best suited, as proposed by the developers, near access points to the freeway system. Its size and location lessens urban sprawl and traffic congestions, keeping commuters out of the downtown retail area for shoppers. Let' s keep quality office buildings in those locations that already have large buildings and are designed to accommodate more. Sincerely, 00 0 L. d aafraot, 911 Lynnwood Ave. NE Renton, WA 98056 , I• - ----- - - - ------------ --- -------- -- III' - - - - - - -• 1 PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF RENTON MAY 01991 REChWED May 9 , 1991 The Planning & Development Committee City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 RE: Renton Village Associates SA, CU-078-90 Dear Council Members: As a resident of Renton, I wish to urge the City Council to support the redevelopment of Renton Village Shopping Center and the addition of a ten (10) story office building to the complex at Renton Village. This development will bring favorable attention to our city and the downtown area of this city. The downtown retailers should attract a significant portion of the individuals working in these office buildings; their new purchasing power should lead to the much needed redevelopment of the downtown area. Office buildings of this type are best suited, as proposed by the developers, near access points to the freeway system. Its size and location lessens urban sprawl and traffic congestions, keeping commuters out of the downtown retail area for shoppers. Let' s keep quality office buildings in those locations that already have large buildings and are designed to accommodate more. Sincerely, tA /OWY01 ad/14)/A G LV 1 --1cni\fto c? o51 Anril 22. 1991 Renton City Council Minutes Page 145 to the apartments. MOVED BY EDWARDS, SECONDED BY ZIMMERMAN, COUNCIL REFER THIS MATTER TO THE ADMINISTRATION FOR INVESTIGATION AND REPORT BACK TO COUNCIL. CARRIED. Citizen Comment: Lynn - William Lynn, 3625 Lake Washington Boulevard, Renton, expressed Property Access, BNR disappointment that the issue regarding the private crossing across BNR Crossing, 3600-3800 property on Lake Washington Boulevard North could not be resolved this Block Lake Washington evening.. Councilwoman Keolker-Wheeler explained that action cannot be Blvd. North taken on this issue until Council is apprised of the available legal options. Citizen Comment: John Pavone, 1407 Shattuck Avenue South, Renton; and Dick Hartnett, 1414 Pavone, Hartnett - Shattuck Avenue South, Renton, expressed opposition to the construction of a Appeal, Renton Village ten-story building in the Renton Village Center (Renton Village Associates) Center, South Grady Way on South Grady Way, and expressed their concern that this development (SA, CU-078-90) would impair the view of residents in the area and increase traffic problems. Citizen Comment Vaupel Versie Vaupel, P. O. Box 755, Renton, urged that the City strongly consider - Board/Commission women and minorities for future appointments to boards and commissions. Appointments Citizen Comment: Webb - Mrs. Webb, 430 Mill Avenue South, Renton, stated that she owns property Sewer Problem, Heather located on 136th Street, Renton. She urged that the City decline the request Downs Area from Steven and Tara Holman, 13612 SE 136th Street, Renton, for sewer connection since the City sewer system in the Heather Downs area is already operating at full capacity. Mrs. Webb also reported that the sewer has backed up on the property, and that remedial action required that a broken check valve be installed at her expense. Citizen Comment: Tara Holman, 13612 SE 136th Street, Renton, reported that the septic system Holman - Request to on her property cannot be repaired, and the seepage is causing a severe Connect to City Sewer health hazard for her family. System Advancement Request MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY EDWARDS, COUNCIL SUSPEND THE REGULAR ORDER OF BUSINESS AND ADVANCE TO OLD BUSINESS, UTILITIES COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Utilities Committee Referred 4/15/91 - Utilities Committee Chairman Keolker-Wheeler presented Citizen Comment a report stating that the Committee considered the request by Mr. and Mrs. Holman - Request to Steven Holman, the proponent, to connect their house to the City's sewer Connect to City Sewer system. Their house is located at 13612 SE 136th Street, which is outside the System City limits. In review of the proponent's request, the Committee found the following: 1) Based on information from the Planning/Building/Public Works Department, a failing septic tank and drain field exist at the proponent's house. 2) Consistent with Council policy, sewer connections may be granted outside the City limits if a failing septic tank and drain field exist. 3) As a condition of allowing this sewer connection, the proponent agree to the following conditions: a) The Holman's sign and have executed covenants agreeing not to protest annexation for their parcel; b) The Holman's make connection to the City sewer consistent with City codes, standards, and policies; c) The Holman's obtain and pay for all required permits, including but not limited to the City Side Sewer Permit and County Right-of-Way Permit; d) The Holman's pay the amount of $2,620.81. This amount being equivalent to the sum paid by the adjoining City properties within Heather Downs for construction of the sanitary sewer mains under Local Improvement District (LID) #279. The Holman's shall have the option of spreading these charges, over a period of ten years with interest thereon fixed at the rate of 10% per annum; and e) Acknowledge as non-City residents they are required to pay the utility rate set by City Council for non-residents (currently one and one-half the standard rate). MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY ZIMMERMAN, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. April 22, 1991 Renton City Council Minutes Page 146 In response to Council inquiry regarding sewer problems in the area and the threat to Renton residents if the Holman connection is implemented, Utility Services Manager Richard Anderson explained that construction of the East Renton Interceptor will relieve difficulties experienced with the sewer system in this area. He stated further that the sewer problems occur during the wet season when rain water enters the system causing infiltration. Mr. Anderson said that the City will conduct an infiltration study this year, and relief should be realized before the next rainy season. Mr. Anderson also stated that connection of the Holman property would not increase the threat to Renton residents served by the sewer system. Councilwoman Zimmerman commented that she supported the addition of the Holman property to the sewer system because this constituted a health hazard to the family. She also stated that the Committee addressed the non-resident issue through the conditions set forth in the Committee report. Councilman Stredicke expressed concern about the City providing service to properties located outside the City limits, and noted that an annexation to the City would also have provided a solution to the situation. *MOTION CARRIED. MOVED BY EDWARDS, SECONDED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, COUNCIL REFER THE ISSUES OF THE INFILTRATION STUDY IN THE HEATHER DOWNS AREA, AND REIMBURSEMENT RESPONSIBILITY FOR INSTALLATION OF SEWER SYSTEM CHECK VALVES TO THE UTILITIES COMMITTEE. CARRIED. Citizen Comment Sewer Versie Vaupel, P. O. Box 755, Renton, commented that the $2,620.81 charge Connection, Holman, SE to Mr. and Mrs. Holman for the construction cost of the sewer is 136th Street approximately the same as was charged to residents 10 years ago. CONSENT AGENDA Items on the consent agenda are adopted by one motion which follows the listing. Councilwoman Mathews requested that items 6.d and 6.g be removed from the consent agenda. Claim: Moskovitz - CL- Claim for damages in the amount of $107.12 filed by Harold J. Moskovitz, 91-039 6058 36th Avenue, Seattle, for towing fees allegedly caused by a premature decision of a police officer to tow his vehicle (3/30/91). Refer to City Attorney and insurance service. Claim: Brown - CL-91- Claim for damages filed by George V. Brown, 4534 Delridge Way SW, 040 Seattle, for damage to vehicle allegedly caused by steel protruding from a bridge, (4/6/91). Refer to City Attorney and insurance service. Appointment: Civil Mayor Clymer recommended appointment of Robert F. Stevenson, 1509 Service Commission Edmonds Avenue NE, Renton, to the Civil Service Commission for a six-year term expiring December 31, 1996. Mr. Stevenson will replace Jerome Faull whose term expired 12/31/90. Refer to Ways and Means Committee. Parks: Interlocal Parks Division submits an interlocal agreement for waterfowl removal which Agreement, Waterfowl provides for a cooperative effort by several local agencies to translocate Translocation portions of the geese populations to areas of Idaho. Refer to Ways and Means Committee. CAG: 91-039, 1991 City Clerk reported bid opening on 4/17/91 for 1991 Slurry Seal; one bid; Slurry Seal engineer's estimate $80,251.68. Refer to Transportation (Aviation) Committee. Appeal: Renton Village City Clerk submitted appeal filed by Thomas A. Goeltz representing Davis Center (Renton Village Wright Tremaine Law Offices regarding site plan approval for the (Renton Associates), South Grady Village Associates) Renton Village Center, South Grady Way (SA, CU-078- Way, (SA, CU-078-90) 90). Refer to Planning and Development Committee. MOVED BY NELSON, SECONDED BY ZIMMERMAN, COUNCIL ADOPT THE CONSENT AGENDA AS AMENDED. CARRIED. Separate Consideration: Utility Systems Division submitted a request for authorization to amend the Item 6.d: Panther Creek Wetlands mosquito abatement contract with Whitworth CAG: 90-047, Panther Entomologist and Pest Control Services (CAG-047-90) in the amount of Creek Wetlands Mosquito $16,400 to include the preparation of a mosquito control option study. Abatement (Whitworth) Councilwoman Mathews noted that the agenda bill for the item indicated that the amount budgeted is $25,000; however, in the attached information there is a statement that the contract shall not exceed $32,450. CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL AI #: 6-A SUBMITTING DATA: FOR AGENDA OF: April 22, 1991 Dept/Div/Board.. Administrative Services/City Clerk Staff Contact.. Marilyn Petersen AGENDA STATUS: Consent XX SUBJECT: Public Hearing.. Appeal of Hearing Examiners decision; Site Plan Correspondence.. approval (Renton Village Associates) Renton Village Ordinance Center, South Grady Way (SA, CU-078-90) Resolution Old Business.... EXHIBITS: A. ,City Clerk's letter New Business.... B. Letter of Appeal Study Session... C. Request for Reconsideration/Reponse Other D. Hearing Examiner's Report, dated 3/5/91 RECOMMENDED ACTION: APPROVALS: Refer to Planning and Development Committee Legal Dept Finance Dept.... Other FISCAL IMPACT: Expenditure Required... Transfer/Amendment.. Amount Budgeted Revenue Generated... • SUMMARY OF ACTION: Appeal filed by Thomas A. Goeltz, representing Davis Wright Tremaine Law Offices, accompanied by required fee received on April 12, 1991. INTER—OFFICE MEMO TO: ALL INTERESTED PARTIES DATE April 12, 1991 FROM: HEARING EXAMINER RE: RENTON VILLAGE ASSOCIATES SA, CU-078-90 The dates of approval should be corrected to read: MARCH 5, 1991 instead of February as shown. Please change your copies . Thank You! • February 5, 1991 OFFICE OF THE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND DECISION APPLICANT: RENTON VILLAGE ASSOCIATES File No: SA, CU-078-90 LOCATION: Renton Village Center/South Grady Way SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Site Plan approval for development of a new 260,363 sq. ft. office/retail sales building, ten stories/133 feet in height. Approval is also requested to construct a six level parking garage and renovation of an existing retail center and service areas. SUMMARY OF ACTION: Planning Division Recommendation: Approval, with conditions. PLANNING DIVISION REPORT: The Planning Division Report was received by the Examiner on February 5, 1991 PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Planning Division Report, examining available information on file with the application, and field checking the property and surrounding area, the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: MINUTES The hearing was opened on February 12, 1991 at 9:25 A.M. in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. The following exhibits were entered-into the record: Exhibit #1 - Yellow File containing application, proof of posting and publication and other documentation pertinent to this request. Exhibit #2 - Vicinity Map Exhibit #3 - Site and Landscape Plan Exhibit #4 - Elevations of Parking Garage Exhibit #5 - Elevations of Office Building Exhibit #6 - Elevations of area to be remodeled The hearing opened with a presentation of the staff report by SENIOR PLANNER, LENORA BLAUMAN. Due to the length of the hearing, and testimony presented, below is a cursory review of testimony by all parties. After reviewing the site and surrounding areas, Blauman said the site where the building is to be located is currently vacant, the office building will be located in the center of the site with the parking garage located to the west of the building. The proposed building will be ten stories in height with retail space on the main level and offices occupying the remainder of the floors. The parking garage will be six levels, with some parking spaces being placed in reserve on the roof level (which will be used for recreational purposes); there will be 1768 parking spaces provided of which 1400 will be located in the parking garage. It was noted that Metro is considering the feasibility of expanding service to this general area. The ERC reviewed this proposal and issued revised mitigated conditions on December 21, 1990 (copy attached) which addressed such matters as aesthetic impacts, light and glare impacts, transportation system impacts, storm water management impacts, on-site and off-site recreation and a construction management mitigation plan. Continuing, Ms. Blauman stated it is anticipated there will be approximately 2873 vehicle trips per day generated from the site, but measures have been set up to address this impact. Improved signage, Renton Village Associates (Callison Partnership) SA, CU-078-90 February 5, 1991 Page 2 signalization, and a study to be funded by the applicant to study traffic in the general area of the site will help to address further concerns about traffic impacts in the already impacted area. Blauman referenced grade and fill for the project and said it is felt this topic was addressed sufficiently in the Renton. Cinema project, and the plans presented by this applicant so far appear to address any concerns that may arise for protecting the development and surrounding areas during the construction period. To mitigate on-site recreation impacts the applicant is providing a jogging trail, interior recreation areas for employees only, and will be contributing $20,000. for recreational amenities in the local community. Reviewing the criteria for site plan approval it was stated the proposal complies with the Comprehensive Plan Map, parking and loading ordinance, landscaping requirements, and development standards for commercial zoning. LOREN LASKO from Callison Partnership, responding to the Examiner's question about the private road within the shopping center, stated South Renton Village Place is a city-owned road - part of the mitigation when the cinema was built .was that Village Associates would extend that road up to Grady Way. Lake is to be maintained as a private road from south of Grady Way to where it abuts to South Renton Village Place behind the Ernst store. The entire length of Lake Road as it runs through the shopping center is considered a private road. The Examiner said it has been his understanding that private roads are not permitted in commercial and industrial subdivisions and why it is being permitted in this case. Planner Blauman said she understands in this instance it has been an existing arrangement and is not an expansion of a non-conforming use. The proposed office tower will have about 800 - 1000 new employees, with approximately 200 of those to be located in the top levels of the tower offices. The parking garage will provide parking for both Office users as well as commercial customers, with outside parking available for customers of the retail Shops to be located on the first level of the proposed building. Noise, light and glare for surrounding residential properties on Talbot Hill was reviewed as well as view corridors interrupted by the height of Ohe proposed building. Also reviewed was pedestrian circulation, a traffic analysis prepared by the Transportation Division and the mitigation measures to be developed; open space,,signage, restricted ime for parking, property values in the area, construction mitigation measures including hours of operation, and, in closing, staffs recommended conditions of approval were read into the record with an addition to 1(d) to read "The applicant shall provide improvements to the Ernst Center facade, and other facades as necessary." • ' I At the hour of 10:30 A.M. a ten minute recess was taken. When the hearing reconvened at 10:401 BRIAN CLOEPFIL•of Callison Partnership, 1420 - 5th Avenue, Suite 2400, Seattle 98101, reviewed the Conceptual plan and approach to the project addressing the expansion of retail needs in the area, the public image they wished to maintain; height of the proposed building and how they feel it fits into the skyline of the area without impacting light and air qualities; amenities that will be provided to employees as well as the community; parking garage and parking to be held in reserve, storm drainage, Water retention on the ground floor of the garage, open space, glare on Grady Way and Talbot Road with a possible redesign of window facades, landscaping on the roof of the parking structure (which Will.also be used for a while as a recreation area for employees) and lot coverages. Mr. Cloepfil also sated it was not felt a elevator was necessary in the garage as there would be a skybridge provided on the second level of the parking structure with access from the office building (there will still be four stories in the parking structure above the skybridge). When asked 'to provide parking calculations', Planner Blauman stated there will be a total of 1768 spaces provided, of those there will be 1400 in the iarage, of the 1400, 1300 will be for office employees and 100 for retail users. In the open air there acre 357 parking spaces for retail users. The city will call for 20% of those to be put in reserve (about 2150) which will be in the garage and for the retail center some spaces may be in reserve in open space ol the garage. Local resident, and speaking for other Talbot Hill residents, JOHN PAVONE 1407 Shattuck Avenue p g South, Renton 98055 spoke in opposition to this proposal stating the area around the shopping center, and in particular Talbot Hill, is now almost impossible to exit during the normal course of a day and said he cannot understand how city staff can support a statement that an additional 2800 plus vehicles added to that corridor would not create an impact on the whole area. He feels it is imperative that an in-depth traffic study be completed and the current gridlock in the area be seriously addressed by the city before this project is allowed to move forward. He also addressed the loss of view corridor for his home with a ten story building intrusion, which will in turn effect the property value of his home. Testifying on behalf of the Traffic Division for the city was CLINT MORGAN, who 'presented a review of the level of service (LOS) for eleven major intersections in the city - which included the Rainier Avenue, Grady Way, Talbot Road, Puget Drive, Benson Road, Main Avenue intersections.. He said he had no idea when the Rainier/Grady Way intersection would be expanded and acknowledged only about 1/10th of the cost would be paid by the applicant ($400,000.00) with no other funding set aside for the project at this time. He said it would take funds other than TBZ funds to do a project of this size. He acknowledged Benson and Grady Way is currently at level F and will remain at level: F with or without this new project. He said an intermediate traffic study was done to address channelization of Grady Way and right turn lanes. It is assumed the applicant will take part in this study and Mr. Morgan said there will be no need to acquire property to achieve this channelization. MR. LOREN LASKO advised that there are four separate ownerships of property along that corridor • Renton Village Associates (Callison Partnership) SA, CU-078-90 February 5, 1991 Page 3 (Holiday Inn, Chevron, Renton Village properties and One, Two and Three Renton Place are also under separate ownership). He said there is no city right-of-way along the undeveloped third lane along Grady Way or Talbot Road. Trying to clarify - the Hearing Examiner summarized saying the levels of service in some cases are approaching level E and will become E or F with or without the project. Mr. Morgan said he felt the additional traffic from this project will increase the length of peak hour traffic for the area, and some drivers will try to find other routes. RANDALL PARSONS from the city's Storm Water Utility Division responded to questions from the Examiner regarding the storm drainage system, water management mitigation plans for this project, garage basement ponding in the proposed parking garage, and water accumulations in the outside parking lot. Also adding other comments was BRIAN CLOEPFIL who said engineers are looking at solutions to the possible flooding on the south portion of the site and feels a solution can be worked out that addresses the concerns by Mr. Pavone regarding loss of view corridors. He said the heights involved meet requirements set out by the FAA. He said impacts to residents may be more recognizable because of the mixed zoning in the area and the influx of more development in an urban area as opposed to additional residential development. In closing comments Planner Blauman noted the width of buildings would be approximately 200 ft.; the applicant is providing a total of 1768 parking spaces based on leasable rather than gross square footage; the parking proposed does not include phase 2 parking because there is no phase 2 development yet. But, phase 2 could, at a maximum, include 850 additional parking spaces but it is hoped that the reserve parking from the current proposed phase could possibly be used to offset that figure. Lot coverage in the commercial zone is usually 66% but with the proposed parking garage lot coverage will go up to 75% with lot coverage now between 45-48%. Blauman noted the city is currently working on view corridor regulations; she said staff is working to maintain a balance between new and existing development keeping in mind constraints on the site as well as the needs of the neighborhood and desirability of providing development which will enhance the appearance and function of the community. The issue of grade and fill was addressed and why a permit was not issued for the site. Ms. Blauman said there is a grade and fill permit per se handled by the Building Division after the proposal goes through the land use and environmental review. What is being done at this time is incorporating an assessment of fill and grade impacts on a project within the environmental and land use impacts so even though grade and fill is not called out specifically when asking for an erosion control plan and storm drainage management plan and soils analysis, staff does incorporate into those evaluations the impacts that would come from the type and amount of soil on the site. The Examiner called for further testimony regarding this project. There was no one else wishing to speak, and no further comments from staff. Due to the length and complexity of the hearing the Examiner requested, and was granted, an additional week to issue his decision. The hearing closed at 11:50 A.M. FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & DECISION: • Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: 1. The applicant, Renton Village Associates/Callison Partnership, filed a request for approval of a Site Plan for an office/retail complex, parking garage, and renovation of a retail center, together with a Conditional Use Permit to allow the office building to exceed the 95 foot height limit imposed in the B-1 (Business/Commercial) zone. 2. The yellow file containing the staff report, the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) documentation and other pertinent materials was entered into the record as Exhibit #1. 3. The Environmental Review Committee (ERC), the City's responsible official, issued a Declaration of Non-Significance - Mitigated (DNS-M) for the subject proposal. (See below). 4. The subject proposal was reviewed by all departments with an interest in the matter. 5. The subject site is part of the Renton Village Shopping Center. The site is south of South Grady Way and east of Lake Avenue South. South Renton Village Place runs along the south margin of the project site as Lake Avenue curves into it. Talbot Road South is located at the east edge of the shopping center, while I-405 defines the south margin of the shopping center. Apparently, Lake Avenue wouild be deveoped as a private roadway. 6. The map element of the Comprehensive Plan designates the area in which the subject site is • located as suitable for the development of commercial uses, but does not mandate such development without consideration of other policies of the Plan. Renton Village Associates (Callison Partnership) SA, CU-078-90 February 5, 1991 Page 4 7. The site was annexed to the city with the adoption of Ordinance 1547, enacted in May, 1956. 8 The proposal consists of three major components: a. A 10-story complex with office space located over retail facades and with a combined floor area of approximately 260,363 square feet; b. A 6-level parking garage., and c. Renovation of part of the existing retail complex. 9. Site plan review is required of these three facets of the proposal. 10. The B-1 zone permits buildings up to 95 feet in height. Buildings may be permitted to exceed that limit if a conditional use permit is warranted. 11. The block in which the subject proposal would be located contains generally from east to west and north to south, two of the three Renton Place buildings, the 'L' shaped retail complex that contains Pay and Save, the supermarket and smaller retail shops, the Ernst Store, the third Renton Place office building, the newly renovated theater complex to the south, the gasoline service station along Grady, the Evergreen Building and the Holiday Inn. 12. While this mix of uses appears to be under one ownership, the uses are developed on a number of legally segregated parcels. The frontage along Grady is owned by at Ieast four different entities, including the applicant. 13. The combined office building/retail use would be located just west of the existing grocery/Pay and Save complex. Existing parking for the complex would intervene between the developments. 4. The parking garage would be located on what would be the southeast corner of the intersection of Grady and Lake. It would be just west of the proposed office building. It would be connected to the office building by a second level skybridge. 5. The proposed renovations would occur to the retail complex which now consists of the grocery store, Pay and Save, and smaller retail uses. In addition to new facade treatment, an arcade/walkway would be opened through the existing retail businesses. This walkway would provide easier passage to the front of the retail stores and the new retail stores located on the lower level of the proposed office building for tenants of the Renton Place buildings. , I 16. A variety of other uses are located north and east of the subject site, outside the scope of this large superblock. North of the site is a Metro Park and Ride Lot. Light industrial and a,mix of residential uses are also located north of the site, generally north of So. 7th Street. East of the site (across Talbot Road) are the Puget Power offices. Car dealerships are located on both the northeast corner and northwest corner of Rainier and Grady, northwest of the subject site. A variety of other commercial, mainly office uses, are located west of Rainier along Grady. 17. The ERC imposed a number of mitigation measures on,the proposal. These measures can be grouped together under various topics as follows: a. Transportation related measures that address contributing to the pending Grady Way Benefit Zone; providing improvements to the Grady/Lake intersection; street lighting improvements; voluntarily contribution for a study of Grady between Rainier. and;Talbot and possible contribution to its improvement (both conditions appear voluntary); provide a transportation management plan (TMP) for ride-sharing, Metro usage and other related issues; placing parking into reserve to discourage driving; b. Aesthetic and recreational related measures that address landscaping and light and glare (glare also raised safety issues related to reflection on nearby roadways during certain seasons); and on-site recreation; and a fee of $20,000 to mitigate off-site recreational impacts; j c. Storm water management plans to address the flood plain and displacement of storm water by this development; and hold harmless agreement in favor of the city which states "the applicants have decided to proceed, at their own volition, thereby waiving their rights to hold the municipality liable for any flooding and/or for any damages to property or person arising from such flooding;" and • Renton Village Assc......;tes (Callison Partnership) • SA, CU-078-90 February 5, 1991 Page 5 d. Construction management related issues including hauling routes, dust and erosion control, soil remediation if necessary, and staging areas. (See the attached ERC determination for the full text of the measures) 18. The proposed building will be ten (10) stories, or 133 feet tall. 19. The building will contain approximately 260,363 square feet of net office space. The first floor will contain approximately 13,650 square feet of retail space. The approximately 79,000 square feet of existing retail space will be remodeled. 20. The first floor of the office building will be wider and longer than the upper levels. The first floor will provide a pedestal of sorts that will house retail operations. The remaining floors, housing office space, will be narrower. A canopy will provide a covered walkway along the east retail facade and wrap around the north and south facades. The building facade at both the retail, first floor level and at the upper levels will be very intricate. The colonnaded east facade will contain store fronts, while the south facade will be indented to provide room for part of a plaza. The west facade at ground level and roof level will be gently re-curved along its northern half. The facade of the upper stories will be articulated at the corners with 16 foot deep indents. In addition, the building will step in, as indicated above the first floor, and at the tenth floor level. The building will use a wide variety of architectural features to minimize the apparent bulk and mass of the structure. 21. The facade will consist of bands of grey-beige painted concrete, and windows of reflective blue-green glass. Accent treatment will consist of porcelain tiles in bluish tones or other accent colors. The tile treatment will be found at both the base of the building and along the top. The retail treatment will be plaster painted to match the remaining features of the building. 22. The windows will be set in at an angle to minimize glare and reflection. This was a particular concern along Grady Way. An analysis of sun angle and glare found some problems along Grady during certain periods of the year. Staff has indicated that those problems will be resolved by appropriate window placement. Neighbors south of I-405 want the same assurances since they would be affected by reflection in the southerly direction, particularly by a tall building. 23. The first floor footprint is approximately 144 feet wide (east/west dimension) and approximately 280 feet long (north/south dimension. The upper stories will have a.narrower profile. The building would be approximately 120 feet wide and 256 feet long. Again, these dimension would be affected by the irregular facade of these upper stories. 24. The applicant proposes developing a six-level parking garage. The first level of the garage will be below the new grade of the site. The garage is an irregular trapezoid. The garage is will be approximately 192 feet wide (east/west), at its widest (north facade), by approximately 480 feet long (north/south). The west wall of the garage breaks and turns inward to the southeast about two-thirds of the way south along the north/south axis. The garage would be approximately 80 feet from the office building. 25. The exterior treatment of the garage would mirror the office building. It will have 'painted -concrete walls and open bands matching the appearance of the office building's bands of concrete and windows. It will also receive similar accent treatment. There will be recessed areas to provide visual relief along the longer walls. Texture changes and indents at the corners along the north side are also intended to reduce the apparent bulk of the building. Staff has recommended that the stairwells be open for safety reasons. The applicant does not propose providing an elevator in the garage - relying on the stairways and the skybridge link at the second level. 26. The garage is designed to provide 1,401 parking stalls. An additional 367 stalls will be located in the open parking lot generally east of the office building. Staff has recommended that twenty percent of the stalls be placed in reserve to discourage driving. Stalls will be divided between office tenants and retail shoppers. Staff has recommended that the reserved parking be used for landscaping. Reserve stalls located on the top level of the garage would be temporarily used for recreation. 27. The applicant will also be renovating the existing tier of retail stores east of the proposed office building and parking lot. The complex will receive a colonnaded facade that matches the lower level of the office building. Decorative towers will match the accent detail of the office building and garage. These towers will apparently contain a reader board or boards. As indicated, there will be a passage-way through the center of this retail complex that permits easy pedestrian passage between the various buildings on the east and west. Paving stones, I ' i Renton Village Associates (Callison Partnership) SA, CU-078-90 February 5, 1991 Page 6 • walkways and accent detail will link the proposal's various elements. Staff recommended that the Ernst complex receive similar treatment. The applicant did not propose any renovation to the Ernst facade since the entire building may be renovated later. 28'. The applicant proposes greatly enhanced landscaping along the boundaries of this portion of the complex. There will be landscaping along Grady and Lake north and west of the garage. ' Larger trees are proposed adjacent to the garage to further reduce its apparent bulk. Landscaping will complement the plaza along the south edge of the office building. There will be landscaping in the parking areas, near aisle ends and near the center of some of the parking rows. Trees will also be used on the top of the garage. 29. The proposal is estimated to generate an additional 2,873 vehicle trips per day. The traffic analysis of the project was limited in scope and did not address the impact on Level of Service (LOS) on some of the intersections near the proposal. At the public hearing staff provided additional information on LOS. The Level of Service is as follows: - Grady and Rainier LOS will drop from LOS E to LOS F. It is estimated that the LOS would drop to LOS F in any event. - Talbot and Grady LOS will drop from LOS D to LOS E. Again, it is anticipated that the LOS would'drop to LOS E without the project. - The Grady and Benson LOS will remain at LOS F. 30. LOS F is generally described as extreme blockage and in qualitative terms is considered intolerable. When additional traffic is added to intersections with an LOS F, generally intolerable conditions last for a longer period. The additional traffic is spread over a longer period of time lengthening the peak hour commute. Drivers also seek alternate routes to avoid the impeded intersections and spillover onto local roadways. 31. Most of the intersections in the vicinity of the subject site are already strained with high LOS during rush hour. Improvements are proposed for Grady and Rainier, but the plans are indeterminate at this time. The applicant would contribute to a fund that would be used to rebuild that intersection. The amount contributed would be approximately one-tenth of the i required funding for these improvements. Turning movements and traffic are also impeded along Talbot Road south of the site. 32. Staff suggested additional improvements would be' studied to improve the Grady Way corridor and provide pass-through lanes and turning lanes. Additional right-of-way along the south side of Grady adjacent to the subject site would have to be acquired from the four or five property owners along this corridor. 33. The site is highly susceptible to flooding. The parking lot and area proposed for development serves to contain storm water on a regular basis. The current level of flooding would not'be modified by the development of the subject site. The site would still 'be subject to periodic inundation according to staff analysis, but the applicant would not be permitted to further exacerbate the flooding. The applicant and staff have provided some preliminary proposals for providing compensating storm water storage. Each of the plans has some difficulties. One plan would use the lower level of the garage to hold storm water. Alarm systems and gates would be required to screen the garage and prevent inadvertent entry of pedestrians or vehicles if the garage is flooded. Another proposal would be to construct below grade vaults to hold the storm water, but eventual siltation would have to be managed and prevented. A third proposal would convey the water south, under I-405 to the Valley wetlands. This proposal would require a number of permits and additional storm sewer line construction. 34. The applicant has provided a "Hold Harmless Agreement" to protect the city in the event property or persons are harmed as a result of flooding that occurs after the site 'is developed. This agreement was required since current flood conditions would not be alleviated and the inundation that has occurred in the past would be expected to continue. Staff and the applicant agreed that the applicant is n'ot responsible for solving the existing conditions. Staff has suggested some overall solutions but those would not be implemented at this time. 135. A second phase to this proposal has been discussed that would replace the Ernst complex:with an additional office building with retail located on the street level. The proposal is speculative and is not further reviewed in this analysis. ' Renton Village Ass1/4.;.,.ates (Callison Partnership) SA, CU-078-90 February 5, 1991 Page 7 CONCLUSIONS 1. This proposal presents some unusual aspects that complicate any decision. The proposal has some very satisfactory elements, but it creates some highly objectional impacts. This is a project that has an attractive building with a lot of interesting detail. It provides visual interest, attractive amenties, and a focal point in its height (and the status of being the first building of this height in the city). It also provides a significant upgrading of a retail center. Finally, it is an economic magnet. 2. Balanced against those very positive aspects we have a building that will be taller than anything nearby; one that is on the outskirts of the downtown core, one that will block views, and one that because of its height will accommodate more tenants, and, therefore, generate additional traffic (potentially 15 to 20 percent more traffic to the area). This analysis ignores the suggestion by staff that a possible two building option might introduce as much traffic, since two buildings are not before this office for review. This taller building also requires a very large parking garage. 3. Ignoring for the moment the traffic generated by an unusually tall building, there is the simple issue of additional traffic that even a routinely sized office building will generate on an already burdened street system. And finally, in the category of what could be considered the major negative aspects of this proposal, there is the flooding situation at this site which is quite serious. 4. Therefore, before discussing the specific site plan and conditional use criteria a general discussion of some of the potential problems seems necessary. First, both the Comprehensive Plan and the Zoning Code would generally permit the subject proposal (although not as tall a building) at this location, subject to reasonable review and conditions. The 133 foot tall building can be permitted under the Zoning Code by a Conditional Use Permit. (See criteria in the discussion below). The Zoning Code provides no distinction between high rise commercial offices and mom and pop grocery stores. The single B-1 zone does not provide any segregation of such uses and therefore, neighbors and property owners, respectively, cannot anticipate what might be proposed or permitted on any particular B-1 zoned parcel. 5. Following that preliminary discussion, there are two major areas of concern, traffic and flooding, as well as subsidiary issues that concern a six level garage without an elevator, and potential view blockage. 6. The first issue is traffic. Most of the major streets and intersections surrounding the subject site are struggling to accommodate existing traffic. Traffic has already reached an LOS of F at Grady and Benson. Traffic at Grady and Talbot and Grady and Rainier are LOS D/E and will approach and reach LOS F in the near future. Level of Service (LOS) ranges from LOS A which denotes a free flowing intersection to LOS F which denotes the worst case where demand exceeds capacity and where severe congestion and delay are occurring. 7. There is no doubt that the ERC addressed the issue by requiring the payment of a substantial fee. Unfortunately, the fee will not provide any practical results for quite some time. The payment of monies may or may not contribute to a solution of the additional traffic that this proposal will generate since there is no time certain fo'r improvements to these corridors. In addition, the solutions will require other funding sources since the Grady Way Benefit District, when it is formed, will not address intersections other than the major one at Grady and Rainier. The condemnation of additional right-of-way along Grady as suggested by staff will require further funding since these properties are in a variety of ownerships. Therefore, instead of actually mitigating the adverse traffic conditions (and payments do not mitigate anything, payments may eventually be used to mitigate those adverse conditions), the rush hour will become extended making traffic insufferable, and in some cases dangerous, since emergency vehicles will be prevented from negotiating through the area. 8. Staff indicated that the proposal would add approximately four percent to the traffic in the area. The fee would approach approximately one-tenth of the necessary costs of improving the Grady/Rainier intersection. And, this solution does not concretely address the other roadways that need improvement including Talbot at Grady, Talbot south of the site, and Grady and Benson. In addition, it has been found that too much traffic suffocates commercial uses (particularly retail uses) since shoppers tend to avoid congested areas. 9. The issues regarding traffic can be stated as follows: Should additional development that will generate more traffic be permitted when the system is already burdened? That's difficult to resolve when evaluating a very well-designed project. But, it does appear necessary to strive for a greater reduction in traffic. Therefore,in order to reduce the traffic the building should Renton Village Associates (Callison Partnership) SA, CU-078-90 February 5, 1991 Page 8 be scaled down in height. Other reasons for this reduction are discussed below under the Conditional Use analysis. 10. The second major issue is that of the recurrent flooding which inundates portions of the subject site - flooding that will not be addressed by the current development. While the subject proposal is designed so that it would not worsen the existing situation, it does absolutely nothing to eliminate a potentially unsafe existing situation. Actually, no final storm water containment design has been presented since each plan has some problems that would need very careful analysis. 11. The city has an affirmative duty to provide and protect for the public health, safety and welfare. Approving additional construction in this area, flood plain or not (this was not satisfactorily resolved, even by the "Hold Harmless Agreement") does not seem to fulfill the duty to protect the public health, safety or welfare. Preventing additional flooding does not address the existing severe problem. 12. Imposing a condition that asks that the city be released from damages is poor planning. It also demonstrates that the city acknowledges the problem. It is inappropriate to ignore such a prominent issue and it is untenable not to actually solve it. The execution of a Hold Harmless Agreement merely affirms that a problem exists. Approving additional development at this site would only demonstrate that the city would be closing its eyes to the potential problems and merely preserving its purse if harm did result. The site floods - pure and simple! It has flooded for years, and each of the previous solutions has been as ineffective as the ones that followed it. But, each "solution" has been used to justify more development. The execution of a "Hold Harmless Agreement" does not address the issue appropriately. Something that increases the chance for serious injury or worse, and encourages more people to congregate in this area is not an effective treatment of this long recognized ill. 13. The applicant argues that the existing flooding is not a problem they created and they cannot address it alone. It seems inconceivable that the applicant would argue that flooding which would surround the subject site is not their problem, and then add more buildings and people to the situation. 14. The applicant's solution is no solution. The applicant proposes mitigating the impacts of its development by storing in some fashion storm water that would otherwise be displaced by filling the site for the new building and parking garage. It does nothing about the existing situation. The applicant will be encouraging more people to work, shop and park in an area subject to severe inundation, without solving the problem. During floods we will then have a building or buildings (if one includes the parking structure) that could become islands in the flood waters that already occur regularly. During heavy, but not infrequent rains, flooding will still occur. The parking lot will still flood, cars will still be submerged. and quite possibly these new structures will be islands that could require evacuation. 15. It does not matter who created the problem of flooding., or when it was created, or whether this applicant is 'responsible' for solving the existing situation. Flooding occurs on the site on'a regular basis and adding more people, cars, and improvements without first, finally solving that; situation is irrational. 16. The other important issues are the parking garage and the view blockage. The applicant has proposed a large garage that will .be prominently located on the site. Design details will attempt to lessen the bulk but it is still almost 500 feet long and six stories high. In any event, the. garage appears well designed given the task of providing parking for 1,400 vehicles, except for the fact that it does not have an elevator. It appears that the applicant has proposed a six level parking garage that for all practical purposes will be hard to access without an elevator. The legally handicapped would not be alone in finding four flights of steps an impractical obstacle. The elderly, women dressed in heels, and those carrying or delivering items would find accessing the upper levels of the garage a formidable task. Even with the proposed second level skybridge, four flights of stairs would be required for outside patrons and building tenants to reach upper level parking. 17. While the handicapped will be provided with ground level or skybridge level parking spaces, others would be left to negotiate four flights of stairs or meander up four tiers of a gently sloping ramp system. The alternative of walking the gentle ramp ignores the fact that walking the series of ramps would require a stroll of a Quarter to a half mile. This is the result of the fact that each long leg of the garage is approximately 480 feet in length. Spiraling up and down the ramp adds up, and would be a major accomplishment on foot. 18. While there may be security issues in providing an elevator, it seems that if the city is going to encourage urban amenities and larger buildings they will have to tackle the security issues • • Renton Village Assc,�;aces (Callison Partnership) SA, CU-078-90 February 5, 1991 Page 9 inherent in such development. An elevator in a six level parking garage does not appear to be an amenity as much as a necessary requirement for such a tall structure. 19. Finally, before tackling the actual site plan and associated conditional use permit, the issue of view blockage should be addressed. City code provisions do not address the issue of view blockage, although the Comprehensive Plan suggests views should be preserved. This issue is related in a remote fashion to the absence in the Zoning Code of language that clearly distinguishes between urban commercial uses and suburban or neighborhood commercial use. It also relates back to the Comprehensive Plan which does not provide sufficient guidance when it suggests that a parcel is appropriate for commercial uses but does not distinguish between the low-rise shopping center (the predecessor of all the development that has occurred on this site) as meeting commercial objectives, and tall high-rise office buildings. The view of the southern neighbors, those on Talbot Hill, will be permanently altered by this development as it was by the construction of the Evergreen Building. Substituted for views of Lake Washington and Mercer Island in the distance, will be urban lights in the foreground. It is impossible to make a qualitative determination on the issue. As long as the problems of glare and reflection are adequately addressed, the question of view cannot be otherwise weighed in this analysis. As suggested by staff, recessing the windows and changing their angle slightly should eliminate glare and reflection problems. 20. A separate issue is presented by the question of whether a 133 foot building should be located in this area, when such permit authority is discretionary, as it is under the Conditional Use provisions. (See the discussion below) Site Plan Approval 21. The site plan ordinance provides a number of specific criteria for reviewing a site plan. Those criteria are generally represented in part by the following enumeration: a. Conformance with the Comprehensive Plan; b. Conformance with the Building and Zoning Codes; c. Mitigation of impacts on surrounding properties and uses; d. Mitigation of the impacts of the proposal on the subject site itself; e. Conservation of property values; f. Provision for safe and efficient vehicle and pedestrian circulation; g. Provision of adequate light and air; h. Adequacy of public services to accommodate the proposed use; As conditioned below, the proposed use satisfies these and other particulars of the ordinance. 22. The site's designation as commercial by the Comprehensive Plan leaves out many pertinent issues. Similarly the site's B-1 zoning does not provide any assistance in determining whether the proposal is appropriate in this location. The proposal does continue the trend that has occurred along Grady from Benson to Rainier. Larger office buildings are found along this corridor than in other areas of the city. The proposal will most certainly improve the retail aspects of the site and provide unifying elements tying the immediate site's co4nponents to the Renton Place buildings by pedestrian links. The 800 to 1,000 tenants would strengthen the economic prospects of this area. • 23. It appears unlikely that as staff reports, that developing this site near two major arterials will minimize both travel and congestion. The proximity to I-405 could minimize travel but the traffic congestion will only be exacerbated by this development. 24. With the exception of the 95 foot height limit the applicant seeks to exceed, the proposal meets the requirements of the Building Code. The proposal does not exceed the 75% lot coverage, and all of the facilities meet or exceed minimum setbacks. The applicant has also provided more than adequate landscaping around the buildings, along the periphery, and in the parking lots. The Fire Department has reviewed fire safety in regards to this proposed tall building. 25. As has already been stated, the building provides, besides its unique height, interesting design features including a first floor colonnade, the top floor's intricate curved detailing, tile accent treatment, articulations and landscaped plaza and entry. If anything, there may be too much Renton Village Associates (Callison Partnership) SA, CU-078-90 February 5, 1991 • Page 10 emphasis on intricacy. The eye-catching towers that incorporate a reader board or boards detract from the proposal. All aspects of these towers that appear to be signs should be subject to strict review under the sign code. Even the parking garage has been spruced up with substantial efforts at masking its proposed size. Texture changes reflecting those found in the office building will break up the garage's expansive east facade. Similar elements including accent tile, indented panels and corners will also aid in its appearance. Landscaping will tie the project together and screen the various elements. The project is quite acceptable from an aesthetic design standpoint. • 26. The large buildings, both the six story garage and the proposed ten story office building, will definitely have an impact on other property. As mentioned earlier, views will be blocked - not only the views of residents to the south, but the views from the other tall buildings. These impacts are to be expected. Presumably the modification to the facade and window treatment will minimize or eliminate unnecessary glare and reflection on these viewers. One thing that must be addressed is the glare on roadways near the site. As first envisioned, the proposal would have had drivers along Grady subjected to up to 5 to 10 seconds of reflected sunlight. Staff indicated that the glare will be reduced to negligible levels that should not impact safety. 27. The two issues prominently discussed above, traffic and flooding, have not been adequately addressed by the proposal. Approximately 2,800 additional vehicle trips will be generated by the proposal. These trips will be added to a road system that is severely congested according to Traffic Engineering standards. Both the existing LOS E and F point to critical conditions on these roads. It does not appear that traffic issues can be appropriately addressed by the payment of a fee that will not counter the immediate adverse impact this additional traffic will have on the area's roadways. Therefore, the project should be scaled back. The building should be limited to the 95 feet permitted in the B-1 zone. While the project will still generate a substantial amount of traffic, it will be reduced somewhat by a reduction in tenant occupancy. This office would recommend that the upper level treatment be maintained and that intermediate floors be reduced in number to preserve the interesting features found near the top of the building. A beneficial side effect of reducing the office building's height would be,that the parking garage could also be reduced in bulk. The garage's size reduction obviously follows any reduction in building height in a comensurate fashion. I# 28. On the issue of the flooding which occurs even in the absence of this proposal, it seems certain that before any additional development can occur, the flooding situation should be solved. The proposal cannot be approved without a viable solution since construction with the now existing flooding problem only increases the potential for injury both to personal property and to persons. i 29. Therefore, avoiding the applicant's reliance on SEPA's limitations that only permit one to -� condition a project based upon impacts that are specific to the project, this decision is predicated not on SEPA, but on the inherent right to condition a project to protect the public, health, safety and welfare. It is imprudent to further develop the subject site with the flood potential that now exists. 30. Therefore, the applicant will have to solve the flooding, whether it is by individual action 'or concerted action that involves an LID or other method, prior to the issue of any building permit. As for compensating flood water storage, utilizing the lower level of the public garage re-introduces the potential for injury. The garage shall not be used to hold flood waters. j 31. The development will probably increase the property value of the subject site. Initially, development of the site will probably depress residential property values upslope from the site. Whether the loss of views from the adjacent office buildings will affect values is difficult to assess. 32. The pedestrian amenities are geared to provide easy passage through and around the site. Sidewalks and pathways link the various elements of the site together. They also separate pedestrians from vehicular traffic. 33. In summary, except for the large garage (which reduction in size should now address), the absence of any positive solution to the flood situation and the poor traffic LOS, the proposal , would provide an interesting addition to the city. ' Renton Village AssC,..sites (Callison Partnership) SA, CU-078-90 February 5, 1991 Page 11 Conditional Use Permit 34. The request to build a building more than 95 feet tall requires a conditional use permit. The applicant for a Conditional Use Permit must demonstrate that the use is in the public interest, will not impair the health, safety or welfare of the general public and is in compliance with the criteria found in Section 4-31-36 (C) which provides in part that: a. The proposal generally conforms with the Comprehensive Plan; b. There is a general community need for the proposed use at the proposed location; c. There will be no undue impacts on adjacent property; d. The proposed use is compatible in scale with the adjacent residential uses, if any; e. Parking, unless otherwise permitted, will not occur in the required yards; f. Traffic and pedestrian circulation will be safe and adequate for the proposed project; g. Noise, light and glare will not cause an adverse affect on neighboring property; h. Landscaping shall be sufficient to buffer the use from rights-of-way and neighboring property where appropriate; and i. Adequate public services are available to serve the proposal. The requested conditional use permit cannot be justified given the extreme traffic congestion in the area, the size of the garage necessary to support an extra tall building, and the fact that the building is inappropriate given the surroundings. 35. This site is at the edge of the downtown business district. It has already developed a character with its six and seven story buildings that do not exceed the normal code requirements. The site is segregated from the growing office park center in the Valley and does not flow naturally toward it. The break provided by I-405 in this area separates the site not from other commercial uses but from low-rise single family homes on Talbot Hill to the south. While the site may provide for a logical extension of commercial uses from the downtown commercial core, it is not a logical extension of downtown in terms of height. It is not compatible with surrounding uses. The building breaks the height boundaries set by the neighboring buildings at this edge of the natural commercial area. While staff correctly suggests that this is a growing commercial center, it would appear that the term 'center' is misused or misapplied. While variegated height would provide a level of visual interest, this can just as well be provided by the differing form this building already presents. It is very different from its more blocky predecessors in the Renton Place series or the Evergreen Building. 36. Further, height becomes an additional issue when it gives rise to secondary impacts. By increasing the height of the building, one increases the tenant density and this in turn increases traffic both during rush hour and even at off-peak hours. While the numbers may not be directly proportional, increasing the building's height by a third increases traffic similarly. 37. An increase in tenant density also requires a larger parking structure. What is interesting in reviewing this proposal is that the city now faces a five to six story parking structure, whereas in the past it was only the office "towers" that reached six stories. 38. Staff suggested that a taller building would probably be better than a wider one as it would provide more open space. Balancing a potentially wider building is not necessary, since like the concept of the "two towers approach" that is not the question. Neither a two tower approach nor a wider building approach need be reviewed absent a design plan. Those questions would have to be resolved if a plan for such buildings were proposed. So while a wider building may be more or less desirable, that does not necessarily justify this proposed 10 story building. The factors that weigh against the taller, 10 story building are the additional traffic the proposal would generate, the larger garage necessary to support the proposed building, the additional view blockage that would result, and the fact that the building varies too widely from its surroundings at the edge, not the center of the downtown core. 39. This office need not discuss the other issues required by Conditional Use since the permit is not warranted. But for purposes of providing a complete record, the criteria for conditional use permits mirror those for site plan review, with the additional elements of showing community need. There does not seem to be a community need for a taller building at this location. It seems appropriate to channel additional office growth in the downtown core where traffic Renton Village Associates (Callison Partnership) SA, CU-078-90' February 5, 1991 Page 12 would be less of a problem and where a taller building would provide more of a needed identity and focus. DECISION The Conditional Use Permit is denied. The Site Plan is approved subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant shall comply with the conditions imposed by the ERC subject to a pro rata reduction in fees as affected by this determination. 2. In order to protect the public, health, safety and welfare, no additional development of this site shall occur until the current flooding problem is resolved. The applicant shall have to solve the flooding, whether it is by individual action or by concerted 'action that involves an LID or other method, prior to the issuance of any building permit. 3. The storm drainage system developed for this proposal shall be approved, in writing, by the appropriate city officials. The proposed system must satisfactorily demonstrate that it will not increase flooding on the site or adjacent to the site and provides for 100% (One Hundred Percent) compensating storm water storage. 4. The building shall not exceed 95 feet in height. Any reduction shall be achieved by reducing the intermediate floors that provide the basic rectangular floor plan. That is, the detail found at the ground floor and the upper story shall be preserved in the final 95 foot building if possible. 5. The lower level of the garage shall not be used for compensating flood storage as it will unduly jeopardize the public health, safety and welfare of the general public. 6. The garage shall be reduced in size to provide a reduction in parking stalls in proportion to the reduction in office building size. 7. If the parking garage is more than 4 levels high it shall be equipped with an elevator. l 'I. 8. The parking garage and all security related to the garage shall be subject to the approval of the City of Renton, but in no event shall the elevator be eliminated unless the garage is reduced to four levels or less. 9. All windows on the office building and any reflective materials, including but not limited to trim and accent materials, utilized on any aspect of the proposal shall be designed and installed to reduce glare to insubstantial levels on adjacent roadways and nearby residential uses. 10. . All landscape materials shall be guaranteed for a period of at least three years by the posting of a bond or other suitable instrument. ORDERED THIS 5th day of February, 1991. FRED J. KkkFMAN HEARING EXAMINER TRANSMITTED THIS 5th day of February, 1991 to the parties of record: Brian Cloepfil Callison Partnership 1420 - 5th Avenue, Suite 2400 Seattle, WA 98101 ,; Loren Lasko Callison Partnership 1420 - 5th Avenue, Suite 2400 Seattle, WA 98101 • Renton Village Asso �s (Callison Partnership) SA, CU-078-90 February 5, 1991 Page 13 John Pavone 1407 Shattuck Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 Marjorie Elfers 1612 Lake Avenue So. Renton, WA 98055 Mary Highton • 312 So. 15th Street Renton, WA 98055 Lola Todd P. O. Box 1591 Renton, WA 98057 Ina V. Woodin 3901 Park Avenue No. Renton, WA 98056 Grace Van Eyk 230 So. 15th Renton, WA 98055 Richard Teo Renton Talbot Delaware c/o GSIC Realty 333 Twin Dolphins Drive, Suite 700 Redwood City, CA 94065 Mark Cross Robert Lee & Associates 1520 - 140th N.E., Suite 200 Bellevue, WA 98005 TRANSMITTED THIS 5th day of February, 1991 to the following: Mayor Earl Clymer Councilman Richard M. Stredicke Don Erickson, Zoning Administrator Lynn A. Guttmann, Administrator Members, Renton Planning Commission Jim Hanson, Development Services Manager Gary Gotti, Fire Marshal Ronald Nelson, Building Director Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Jay Covington, Mayor's Executive Assistant Transportation Systems Division Valley Daily News Utilities System Division Pursuant to Title IV, Chapter 8, Section 15 of the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 P.M. March 19, 1991. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is ambiguous or based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for a review by the Examiner within fourteen (14) days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific ambiguities or errors discovered by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record, take further action as he deems proper. An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Chapter 8, Section 16, which requires that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk, accompanying a filing fee of $75.00 and meeting other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection or purchase in the Finance Department, first floor of City Hall. The Appearance of Fairness Doctrine provides that no ex parte (private one-on-one) communications may occur concerning pending land use decisions. This means that parties to a land use decision may not communicate in private with any decision-maker concerning the proposal. Decision-makers in the land use process include both the Hearing Examiner and members of the City Council. All communications concerning the proposal must be made in public. This public communication permits all interested parties to know the contents of the communication and would allow them to openly rebut the evidence. Any violation of this doctrine would result in the invalidation of the request by the Court. • • DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED REVISED MITIGATION MEASURES DECEMBER 21, 1990 PROJECT: Village Place North PROPONENT: Fenton Village Associates ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST: ECF-078-90 APPLICATION NUMBER: CU;SA;V-078-90 Applicant seeks: 1) site plan approval for development of a new DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: A pp with a conditional use permit to address the fact that this 260,363 square foot office/retail sales building complex, proposed to be ten stories/133 feet In height will exceed the height limit allowed for the structureakin under the Zoning Ordinance; 2) site plan approval be re�ainedr s3),ction of a five level site plan approval for(re nova6 Pon (includingace) g garage to supplement the existing 261 spacesand for renovation of services partial demolition) of an existing retail center now on the subject propertyThe areas; and 4) a variance for the construction o ments to new rivate roadwy exlsting ona site .,amenities (e.gserve the e10 andscaping proposed development also Includes improve ingress/egress routes, and parking). this phase Is tentatively A annedd Includee f 1t 1s project00 feet ofoffice/retail sparoposed for oce. The City pment at a uwill erequire that Phase II undergo planned to 115,000 square complete environmental and land use review at the time of appIication submittal. The projects have been allowed to be separated because the phases are not functionally Interdependent. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Renton Village Center/South Grady Way ENDATIONS: The Environmental Review Committee Issued a Determination of RECOMM Non-Significance- Mitigated with the following conditions: 1. The applicant shall, In order to address aesthetic Impacts, revise the landscape plan to Include more significant landscaping around the southwestern facade of the five story parking garage In order to soften its apparent bulk, with a conceptual plan to be approved to the satisfaction of the Planning/Building/Public Works Department and the Fire Department ptrior to pusatblicchearinofg the for site plan/conditional use review and a specific plan to be approved Planning/Building/Public Works Department and the Fire Department prior to issuance of site preparation/building permits and with landscaping to be Installed prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. 2. The applicant shall, In order to address light/glare Impacts, prepare a solar glare diagram for those hours of the day on the equinox, summer, and winter soltii es when r tt et ffglee srof reflectedrtain whether sunlight at an angle of 30 degrees or less with the horizon, e reflected glare Is likely to impact 1-405 or GradYW eksraffic. ispublg'lcahearinlgb souhhatttstaff can Development Planning Section at least two prior to ascertain whether mitigation measures should be recommended to the Hearing Examiner for light/glare management. 3. The applicant, In order to address transportation system impacts, shall: a) directly provide he on . improvements proposed for the Grady Way e first et of Ocsatcupan�y for thi n of the Transportat nave opmelnt; Systems Division, prior to the Issuance of th OR b) make a contribution of $436,758.32 to the (pending) Grady Way Transportation Benefit Zone, prior to the issuance of site preparation/building permits. 4. The applicant, In order to address local transportation system Impacts, shall provide Improvements to the south leg of the intersection of South Grady Way and Lake Avenue South, including: a_1 desi nated travel lanes as resented on the site lens submitted b the a Ilcant dated October 1990 • and b im rovements to sl nallzation e. . e ui meet relocation at the Grad Wa Lake Avenue intersection to ensure safe efficient ft.n ti pin t those d ravel lane of,the first plans shall be approved by the Transportation Systems Division, prior to the IssuaCertificate of Occupancy for the subject development. mitmeas - 1 ovements 5. The applicant, in order to address local transportation system i wp h sodium vapor provide un pr along the to street lighting (replacement of mercury vapor lighting u s t id f Grad Wa th xt ndlnto the issuance of the f.from ke Av nu to the eastern bounda of th It to 'i first Certificate of Occupancy for the the satisfaction of the Department, prior subject development. 6. The applicant, in order to address local.. transportation rd stemstu unto be conducted b shall make a thetribuiiQon'n the mo nt of 4 00.00 as a fair share a me turn nt d t rmin the feasibilit of im rov(n th Grad Wa TalboteRoad Unand 2t determine rmine lane tthe lane of to throe h traffic from Rainier Avenue to ion im rovin the intersection of Talbot Road 1m1°ation ofuth trl htr tdurn tra at the south le elioftthe - Irn rovements e. curbs si lizatioortatl int r e tlon . Thl contrib tlon ho I be ot svae d to the re aratlontibuifdi�n erm is forrthe sub ect st m Division rlor to the issuance •f the firs e City dvlopment. In the event that this study beines that Imrovement called uponpo provide la fair and � elects to install modifications, the applicant will u on the to this improvement, with the maximum fee assessment based on of the fair 3s AD WVTE gate for this` development` with the cost of the study credited as a p in order to address transportation system impacts, provide a Transportation 7. The applicant shall,Management Plan, including (but not limited to): a) provision , of van pool/car. pool systems . preferential parking for HOVs, fee-for-parking plan for employees, subsidized bus passes, public , ne cycle l b,ciliti i as " fa esa transit and ride-sharing information materials, a bus shelter, "k(ss-and-ride locil es, cycleily bicycle parking plans, and a fair. share contribution to a study exp of implementing a shuttle service to the site from the local residential community; b) a system/feery s for monitoring of the TMP to determine its level of and ti ingimpidm to ma lokesch rulnecessa e tomodifications (such as relocation of preferential parking); serve the new office/retail complex. Facilities plans shall be developedtoo thelsatisfaction of of the site Planning/Building/Public Works Department and METRO, prior • . preparation/building permits. Service plans shall be developed to the satisfaction of the Planning/Building/Public Works Department and METRO, prior.to issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy. Facilities and services shall be implemented at the time of occupancy of the first structure. the applicant can (Note 7.1: If, after having had In place an effective TMP for two years, icantserved n It demonstrate the need for additional lan pnrki69ilding/Publlr Works release Adml�straf torto release sectglons shall be the responsiblty of the held In reserve.) ' or all of the parking places applicant shall, in order to address transportation system impacts and public safety, provide a 8. The twenty percent of the 1432 parking plan which includes, but is not limited to: a) placement of p spaces'to1 be parking spaces required for the office facility in reserve (with dhereserve asrki ngthe of te shelled off on the top level of the parking garage); b) parking garage; with landscaping, seating and a jogging trail in those reserved areas); c) establishment of a system for assigning parking for retail consumers, vendors and visitors to the office complex so to outside areas and the lower level of the garage, withs signage indicating constructiondica of to those spaces nloa which here to reserved and restricting parking to specified period d) the skybridge at the second level of the garage; e) establishment of a system for assigning upper levels of the garage to employees, with signage indicating those areas which are sso,resetcrved, and with a security system (controlled acess, lighting, s to serve employees`ce consumers and visitors -- provision of a total of 29 handle pp� parking s es with those spaces serving the�mmed atbuilding adJa ent adjacent reta I the centerbrldThese and pla�sestallcba serving the retail area to established In concept, to the satisfatio toohPlanning/Building/Public p blicg/Builddi g/P sblicpla plan/conditional the onPolice use Department and the Fire Department, prior review. Specific plans shall be approvard to tmentthe srjolrfacot the� suanclegoBsitel prepabat(o/bu Id(ng orks, the Police Department and the Fire Dep p permits, and shall be installed prior to Issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy. (NOTE 8.1: The applicant is encouraged to Install a hydraulic elevator In the parking garage for the convenience/safety of employees,visitors and vendors.) ter ent 9. The applicant shall, In order to addresimprotectlon earth plan (including and g eaevationnog all structures a develop a storm drainage plan and flood lal protection roviding compensatory water storage areas on minimum of two feet above the'flood p p rm site), based upon the Surface and Storm mtted at least two weeks r Managementrdliorto the publnce. The Pheapi gjfor�he water management plan must be submitted project and approved by the Storm Water llEngineering by the Storm Water Engineering rSection ing. A specific storm water management plan s be approved prior to Issuance of site preparation/building permits. . 'mitt-fleas -2 • ement Note 9.1: The applicant may elect to,address storm drainage man age Panther Wetlands.through on-site retention/detention or may develop a plan for routing water to ust be If the wetlands are to receive water this Fishe8lesthe anplan Ecology,conveyance A my and/or Co Corpsdeposit andttrelated • approved by the State Departments of agencies. The Storm Water Engineering agencies,ingectio will take responsibility for coordination of plan review with federal, state and local ary.) 10. The applicant shall, In order to address impacts to earth and storm water management, provide a • "hold harmless" agreement which acknowledges bethat Inthe City cluded in an has iexls informng/altereded the p100 year flood that the subject property Is located in an area which y plain, and that the applicants have decided to proceed, at their own volition, thereby waiving their • rights to hold the municipality liable for any flooding and/or for any byages the Storm to property Water Engineeson n arising from such flooding. This document is to be approved Section and the City Attorney, and to be duly recorded prior to the issuance of site preparation/building permits. 11. The applicant shall, In order to address on-site recreation impacts, provide a plan for interior This recreation areas (with shower facilitiesbPlanning/Building/Public Iding/Pu building, Works n use prlor to public hearing for ). plan shall be approved, in concept, y approved by the Planning/Building/Public Works project review. Specific plans shall be Department, prior to issuance of site preparation/building permits; facilities shall be installed prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for the building. a) a for 12. The applicant shall, In order to address recrelty atloncreation lmprovementst tophe lsatisfactlo plot the development and Implementation of off-site Parks and Recreation Department; OR b) make a voluntary contribution of $ 0Tr00stolahthe development of community recreational facilities (Comprehensive Parks Plan, Master ), In order to mitigate recreation Impacts. In installe ed vent th at the applicant of t pes fi tstprovide Certificateslof Improvements directly, these shall be prior to Occupancy. In the event that the applicant prefers to make a contribution, fees shall be provided prior to issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy. 13. The applicant shall develop a Construction Management Mitigation Planthat contractoraddresses: ng, e)a) oslos hurs of operation, b) hauling routes, c) staging areas, d) employee and control, f) the disposal of hazardous materials associated tofaclth ll facilitates timely paovislon of reme�gency , and g) signage Identifying construction areas in order for services. A conceptual plan shall be submittedthe P anningst Btwo Iding/Public Works Department andgFire the complex, and shall be approved by / by the Prevention Bureau prior to that hearing. Specific plans shall be approved • Planning/Building/Public Works Department and the Fire Prevention Bureau prior to Issuance of site preparation/building permits. s to site (NOTE: In conjunction with land use review, staff aequlrements my nand additiond lalnconditionsplo ensure ans and landscaping plans to achieve full compliance with Code adequate functioning of the development (e.g., covenant for joint use of parking areas and amenities, landscaping maintenance bonds.) (NOTE: The applicant will be required to make all Code mandated off-site and on-site improvements, • Including sidewalks, curbs, gutters, street lighting, utility lines, and utility system fees prior to issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy.) • • mltrrmP.As -3 1 ' .. , . , , • .., • C....---. _________,,__,- . , - ,v_ ••._:• Flo? • . • - „0-1.--; .., •• — ....__ . ..•• : 0 ' ' —1___11:1—' -;__ ;••,1,:- _u, IL-. ••-11.,• i ,1.,L_- _. Isiiii !I i..„ 7-:le:t.31 -7 3, uj i- :-.., >z _____I , . • i .. _ 0,• , LL- is, 1 1 .- ,) A 1 • -'1: timi '•", 1 ' 4 '' \ • • ' 1 .....: • .2.1_, •i ,:t..t_i Ir.' .40.111 ) • — atom,),•6. „ : . .12:2/ _I. ) • -7-----E, II •7-- r 14 13,\444:" \ • I • — ) \ , . : • ' ... • i•-• ..-_T- r • L•7. 4, . i=71 ,,T__, 1 , . ...,, _ , .....i .1 5. X•.: 'll. . . ..., 2 ,8 —\s '\ 1•:, '-' ' •' f:' :---h:112 41 • .: ,._4 , )11r1P, 2- ); „„_,,.. --4 ••, \ C7't •?' t' 11•7/ •• . ..,11'. Kilt. 7....V 4...! l 5_2 " . : ,..0. ....., • . .,. .. es ,. \ . • '1 ••I . • --. I . '.'1 7... ••\ • - MA ' • ty r-1 i v I -a-- I • •• ' _...), iimml :, , ..„,-, , L•i-)--'..71 ---.• .. • 1 \ ..1-' _ •?•°° \ \\ \ 1-ilq , '2 _!___—_—_(.: i____Ili-•:: ; i_4: i.____ 4.,: ..ii,-,. _i_2___I - 1 .2 \ . , \ • . ) .:,:-,. 1--1 0, E,-i---=_IL - ;--17--- -i-- _21 — ! , r.: 1 -----g- il: 9 1".\ --•'' . ' \ ' • - -1 '... --;'-;k 1-t--,a.i--• EH mots,ui' ' • . • ; I , , - Q, !__•., ce 1,.?- ._,- --, , • T. ' : '' ___-.--'-i- : , :•-•,: - o„ :, • I E; ',',' \\ - • • ......zt. .. , it. : •,,'--, ..... .. • t • • p i qi ir 1L-71,I ' r -. \ \ , .• ti", ' 4‘5,.se.,*-.1 ,zi•-• . \\ \\ .. • .t.:....__I 1_7 _ i / I 'X \ %, r . B-.1 • ,, — \ • 13 1.6, 1 • - , a 7 15 ' 4 ,..- . :t ----,--, -- -. ; r ___.A • L_____'•\-" 'li ' • • • : ‘ •'i... •Ft- ii". 1:T .' • . • . , i . 1-- ", .r--\V lag i .. iii-loa--. ..5----.••. ' ' '- ' • ‘ '''''''*' ...irM--'' _______. - 1 i a ,c7•7 ' -- ,\.. .1/ ) • I.';•ie I'', - ' .4 • . • .,./ s Art . ! • I -r- i 1 . I n• g 1, 11 ' ..I ',I • I„. (KI \ , Li ‘, *.,, - ! ,r, . . .... I. , ,..,. , . L.:- 1 , 1. 0 • • _.. 4 \ . , . . 1..., imp: ri I) 1.' Ai , . . . ..I I I a. ok:• . L- 1 y •-. . ,,, O .,.," 1 1 - • • I •,----“ I• ',i :P.:.,,••• 1 1 • ,I. . p; 4 •::1 :.!;: ii' c I i• •R` ii , ' . 1 , : 1••• 11 4 _ r =pm ,... •.', • / . • i , 1,...'r I 1 • 1 •. 11 7/.. I I _,.....----1 ._. . . • ....----•• • i\ , ti,. ; . 1..1r..--r--/ J.....e..___...... .. 1 : :. !,>-.----- • • , I . . ..- ---i • / N-----I .....--- , Frit'Ll . • .. • - ''• • 1 I 5rTe- 1 •( ' ..• , . . , . . . . . it 1, : , •• ..1 . 1 • .. . . • ••• 1 1 .... , . •. . /' . . , :• • 1 1 / J . . -J., ' . :,. • ...I L.tk. Pl... . I.j i , , : . . , ,.. ...... . • 1 i •''' 111111.15111Pr /... I . • R -.4. , ( • ---7---, , N ± --.%. • . , . ,.,„5. .:.. -.... •, - ....00111 / UM i • I . .. ' • . ., • '/V'..)''':- ',WrE .MI II .„,i, • •-• .-: . _--;-•- ,_s_L_-_-:-.75, lib --.^.------------- ••-,•.'.•-•-r-----,-....7---:--77 ....lc•••• • t.:__---.:-.1-1)-:hi= 6 . -------•••••--_,.:-.1:-•:-----•--- . .---;-- - .. 5-s"----.4 Mfg, '• • 7; 4------11„,___I.J.I I R4 \ . ., , li ' . • i• 11° 1 . eA\, II , 1 ri _!i... piz 1_1-i-4, . s- . • •--- c" , , 3 o k 111:).•A • . . - Renton Village Associates ECF:SA:CU-078-90 • • . . , APPLICANT Renton Village Associates/Call n TOTAL AREA • 14+ acres i • . Partnership . PRINCIPAL, ACCESS South Grady Way; Lake Avenue .. EXISTING ZONING B-1 , Commercial Use. • • . , EXII ST I NG USE Vacant land; commercial use . 1 ., 1 I PROPOSED USE office building COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN Commercial Use COMMENTS Located at Renton Village Center/South Grady Way • ' - • , , . .. -. . . ..._. . . ...............__........_.........._____..... _ --a- • ..... VILLAGE • .. ...... ..., . . . • . . . . . • .. . . ...., lit,t( . ' .• €1-7 2-'''''' ''.....'' '.------ PLACE .- " NORTH • ...-- _ - ',.•:-:.• --- Li 142C1/1- !'.r.t.., ra<_`•>.:!.-..:.- - / : .- ". RENTO•L SHNGTON - .-: . fa,-----'t---".:7-.."''''.11"--'' •. -- gurrot4.•‘•ioVAEAisccuris . -. . - Q.)-----.V1.,.T..-7-'7.-- *_.::_.--..:.=:".•• • F-, • PX.19. p;...-_,,, ,A.:...• . .- F..?.:•:-:.'"" ' (----,ENA6s.g. . . 11,s, • :r..:7---:-.-.1..=-." :'.'.":-..•:.:::Z- . Call:son .„ • - ,XtID ti..1-:.4;...ia.. .— • . ' . m.--.=.-...,::!,••••-- PRADY wAy 1--)1----"-!---'•- •‘_.,. 1....;:: • ...: . ,.,i. =•,...- - ..---.:.•-,...1,-,---: :3- ••-•-: ::' ,.' 1,--_-/•---} •q.,g.criSK\I 27...----LFL-__. ,....... . -..:7...7: --- i-Ni•-..fit'-'1-,.-._ ---47.-?: . - -....:. . -----•::-:- '-N-----.---"i3.---'.-5.:1;--:.=----,-;-:7-'••• • . • • .r?..-7.:f-•''''I: •••••,--.., 1:•"-----.--:;--fr..._.-,--v- '7-,,,-C .:Z.-..i : • . , --.--.' /4.60; . ,.......!..?,.;:.;%:." ,.--f..-V"`.:_ti-..-f,• -47..-'s-,'• ‘----:=‘=-`' ,,j . .b, . • '•*l'":-.4":_---1.1-.- - •-.1:•'---.- r._-_,...C---' , ' • ta r-t--r...^-Tlf...` c-,.er?1,ti ._.--r-:__•-•:_.,---'''': ;-.•fl,r,..-ii... ‘1,:i c-.7 -•-+- 1.1.-.--"VE". .llilil,„1, • ••••-- ••,-_,••;-„- . . .Egiada'1.:__1_4,..,.......---.....z. . 4:FicirfwAY n.-•v----------'' i-_.--'4.::::::-1-..,11` t--.-_•••:!--.-....._L.— .,--- Ir),7+9.C5R.i.aftei.'iiikeibt= ';,r. /awr--57,-, ___ _. • Pow,\ ,_, .s.,A,i, . :::-•-.:... "":42:7. • ,- - )r;rr,17-- --':.'''Ar'el • , , Ai?' frra-j...- . _/Z.,..--E-.----•------",----- ::::i--....:_1!:•:-:.. ---' - "• .' •. . . ) • , .„;-77'74•,.._.E4 -u-7‘ Fri.; /T\ - '... .o • \•::-_r:;.2•-• 111.4,t------ -- .''...:;:j'''--T.:f...." .--- . • • i • -• ',...e•glior..s.::-- v -•,:v' . -- . - \ - , - ,4 ir •. • - . FL:.:..5--'— ' .. . . ,. •.: i I ' ,4,2%-.'•' -- --—1.- : ;•::... • - • ' 1 ' •-.....2 i.,!i. .. . ,•-,,,,,,..--. ,- . -,/. ,_• -..-....----- so . . . • • . _• ...::,,... ,.._.„.,,-, , . .__ _ _ • -,-;:•r.--:. , , --- „.,, ...,....._. .. . . 1 , , i• 4),. --,;( Tre2::. t:......4. 00 - , t . _ d•-•• . • —4 tr:r.--,..t..•:.,:r.*:.-srr..:..E”:.._ r....r.-- 011 ..i : -,-:.S':', 1' I-. -4-1- I - • --- t-...::_,.....,z, - - ,. ... . • !..r •>'," i!......_,--,r,,'"Ic:=.-‘...1f.44,... 1 1 • I : ...1. b.. Z.1. .1110.'...li "L77;1:.-- ....-........ . .: • VILLAGE PLACE NOPTX .......,... • . • i!::- • ' `''•• .,„%41 ..i 7:1.. , . j .......—..a.,, sy.....,—,........ — 1 :. ! irf' -."40 I .,_,._ ., , 1 --- %.•-• ,_......._."--.4;L:___ - .4.1., r.::•:.:-..,.... r.,..:-.:..... . • • ,._-_,--- -•n. i --FA' , . •..._, ;E.! •:_•.:..::-..z.z...:---..--.....r.::::_,-,:-...-..-_"...,:::.:,.-:_..... : P)..11KING OARAGE •:( ,..—." 1 • —,, ----"S (...V.:'. q •• ••••••‘ '1.-.;,•I --.'17'=:,- ........... ---,7s ...: -- I ,.. -,t . •ft' : . ------ . . -..•-,-..., ,-. . ...-- 1 - - -l N. I ..• ' • i•Jirfi....::F..:::::-.:::---:_:::::::::.. _ ._ ------- . _ . , .----. •. • ._". . rW, • - ' 0 . ....--.........-_...._.. . .. 7- • 4 I - eVA. 1 :rf: • r N .. . - ". _ ... i .. • , , • la• - '• 4 ---:. r_-- ) - / - -- - - ',fi• ; --1-1, ....--...7.0";' _____ -- 1----/- —- --1---.: --) ..._— . • ...:."::::-..-4.=-,..--.::::.-.::.1--_-::..:.::.:: • • i - .si .._(..,.., -vk*ey 16. -7---s. /-., • t ">-<:. -, -\ 7..... - •:•:_:i':::•--:1-•7-27.T..I.E...:-7:•:.•i•-•:-:::---'•• ' ::F.":7:.:-..-.:-:.•••2:-.:7:F:Fa-.72.-i7:ii.--.."-F..-:.:. - • -------- ----- • ------- ... _ __ .•_ - . • ... •• -• .-- - ...\•.'• % ‘F44-4.4/14'; .. -- • E....-.---.=_•.-7-•:.-.::::-_.-.-..-:.:.-....-....,-7.1•::- - ------- - ... e.'. _ . •_. s '-.,..-A,„_., • ./\- --., ---,.---1,.,__/ R.& 6 \,, _, - • - -------• --- . . .. ss•(.../. •';•-": .' ------ : .--- - • ''.,. ,/ - ... .. :::.7.7.-:-:.:::•-..:i7.4-:- .-'••='-:'''''-'4--- ---- -- . -- ' - " - "- I • 1.:::::::......::'::::1.2:7:1::.......'.7-..:..7..._-.- --. . '. . .›,‘4...'' • ----1. --..-/7_:', l'-o-,LZ, ,1 . : 1 • 1:::::::.:::.::::'.:-.7.=Z.7_7.:.:1- --- .,..,-- • i \-:•!----', " ''''''---"---"-.----"- .V.././/. .- . : 1 l.'.•;* i .. •err. ,t.t......S... f•r... A <'% . '—'\ I— "'"• - —.-- . • -C''/ V.1.10'44 i!';. - --;""e•74-,V-., , ,. • ;S.s: •-:.:!. .•. --._.. --,:...;.1-:;,...,; i::::::•:7" . ...L.L.„.05.--..\ "4-.....-L7-:-...•-- ..; •V2:1;1'4:=21'.";:!-I.4....- I.7:::::;.'"'"!**:.....'=-•:.:1. .1..',---WY--f.•>---.WF:;;;;;; -.7.--•. " i j -y-=7---,--1 t- `.-1..4..:1:!..-4._ ,._.4 7_-_- .. --___, _ ._ - .., . . .... _ . . • [..:'.:,:,1,-...:'...; \:AL,k.,)‘..- -- k •-`..:_,':"....t.:2'--,,..- 7, . -!....;;;..`.1::...-,•,......t 7.11: ''.":.:t-r" . • -.•-•...••••... •:;•.11,2. ......-.. '--'-\----_-..7-' • . 1.:.. . LANDSCAPING SITE PLAN Lic.:-...4. - 0.10-‘6KG60 . I !A .. ..... * , \ ATTACHMENT#27 L-1 [r&16NCIICAI.,(.04w-v,r-1 -------- i _....._ . • . , .--"• ' . ,- ,‹---< - • ,kkffux, • VILLAGE PLACE _ .„ . ,. ...-- .... .. ._._ __ ______ __ ..•-- ..--1 ..- ..- . ., NORTH ___ _ ._ _ ! •- ,.......;__..- .,./ __ _ _ _ _ mc-m- Hrao rmslc AND itv, 1 •----- ___ • . wa,rla A' ,•-:,......"".7....\\\\ = — ; ,__.,0 RENTOS.WASHINGTOS ,-- REN-FOS VILUGE ASSOC..,ns ... . . 0 ' • \ ..-,,,.. ,..,...,, , , . E WCS ANV•12. ........-."- . ;-.*-- •'..- • • 7 / I/ , . ':, , .•-. - %."'" ' ..s.,. ..• . \ ' rx ....,,,....,• 5- :::: . . , ....••--- .• ,. • Callison . , • • . - - 9,1ND tirriAP;4111 - _• r ,;" ,,. ,-,:----- _. .. ._. agAl)? thoti , ' •,,•••• -7„c • .:',,,-9,; :2;:-. . ' 66,1i1A5KY5 rivet: :::,-J--- . .. ,,. ,- t ,........•' ---:::-:":•-•''' _ ---""' .t.' ; .....e-' -.......--....:.. ; • • .c-•:-, :. . • -."... •' _. ....T., . • • , • _,. . . . • _ . ...... .....-• . ;11iorftosy . . - --,. ... n . -.,i t . : _ 1• •-•••• • -, .......... _ __ //./.--/7/. //7 • -•-• , ......_:-.•_::_>-:...- 1 , .____ ___- .--1,. ,__J,— ..„.•:-..,,, -- I :,.,.... — s. — . ./ / .///,.. .41.ro- ...- _ 7......__ I k J /- I I. •••••—•••••••• _______--__ I •-• ,.(_-;,>-3:-) - '--( .' \\\\s".: '''. •• !.• ....- • 1 -, ,...-••-- egfar• / • ..., ( sy- --. 1_-_-_:-] . .' ". ''."•'"- .1';- \;i)' _S•••;-. \,2-..\\\\ •i, • • 1.•7' .,. ... --,;,..- •••...: . ,, ?.,, .., . . . I---.. - . . .:..,. •--, .. I,- .1 '..,- • __ 7- 52r...!. ., •...:-`' ' • ..__. .._. . . • '.'..,!...1: . •\\' •••••,.•\\' '`,\ I , .. ._ .. _ (-: :-. .1..1."-, • ,,.,..,....-......... ----3 t , • • . .. . . . .. .. • . , I ... .._. . . '.. 4 .',:, ., •-.„ , , ._ • . .. ___ . ,.. •. , n •.• , .o. e ,, - . . . - . \... \ \ ..._ i..\\ -...: ..,.., .„- ,t ..'• _ . .._ ., ... , , . s, •_J l__, 1--• .Lilik:6_•6 I • ,.... - . . •. .•;11N N\L i .. •-•. '-- /1-1 1 ._..._..___ 1, ' • ' ..-..... _—. . / • it .....-- ,._ . (../ •-,. `..; • •••••s'\' \-.: . I • •- .,• . . .._ ... , ..• i-ts-f c.,•,, .. • , ..,.... - i -------• -• •-.---\\.. •.!..,. - -., , .4 t,,,. ..,- rz . — , • .\-. • . . • . ...... ... .„. ... 7--...... , ... .. ..--.---- i..eit,-....r‘‘.1 n • 1... ...:L.L.....i.... . ••••:1:.V..17.• •. . .. '.•::.,. .• . f—, • •.•... • J LEGEND . . • I .•, , . • .. .. •• •............ . , .. . . ' •"?..e• • . . ' . .. .., • . . . - • . ri .•'1 .- - . .- ....- (1 • _ _ ___ _ _ __ _ —_ _ _ _____ __ , - . ..• . • - - - . -• . . I. .s.,, . . . • .... ,..... . . .• .-. . . .-_---- • _ _____ . ... 1 — - No g„.,14-rom 9W _ _ —, _ . . .. • •_ ,• •_ _ .,... \ _ .•- .. • , . - 6aleicp,i, co&KI., • •••••:,.,•-,..-,',.:_4......,,,:s"._;::::::.::_".:::— . • . VILLAGE _• PLACE • NORTH r „_, RFNTON•WAsa -fM MILL C —r - - _ _Sir . _= = _- .. -- AB= .-. ' • t �� 6px„aEn nw.u,wN E�EGEc - .. .__ : .. .•.•.. _ _ •: - , i :-iceIIIIII �.- ' - _ . .1 1� ! :I I _ -:_ , =i=` i1—1-'''1 F"� {� •_ _y:1 96EEc-t:: I SEEBEo..... _s..__._ _.•_._.. - • • __....'' ; 's uwmr ¢exr- '� 1 .7-4/ �. ... •' _ -r.�. . N..u.a ,sr ,mcY 1�-1 —•�— ---- .:.:. - - - _ use acrnrf {=1-1 ---__= i I -. . .- . Eise ... - 7!MN -1- =F1-1-- --I 1 l I CCU ��--- - .' ._. -w. �' _ .: c ..%1'�P '"' NORTH ELEVATION rvrxa s7orE.v�rr EAST ELEVATO N paper d/i.REfM4 t r/•n�c.�.se.x6 rore .4s1,4. enuv. riL -11111161111222- 1517 4 { yE9mmm -w 1_ �: -11=L m.r_t_'..1—T-1 i-3-i- =��3EEEEEnEFRPEN.Fial�aFgC':: ..2 -1 ^^—1—:—.i— ------ 111 S 1 I— d_ I.m • ..: _Ul' t S I .: flI I I 1 I -REM •-- _— I 1 rr I , :% ""» " 1 I -- -- -- c . . ._.—.. I•y M I • U = __ rk-ea reP.e. ....-_. I - = 15 9U••r■ ���. � - .rrrsarr y..,o,v- / I ` nee-c.sr ^[ _ _ ♦z :_"`r�l l��«c ..x® =.:^_.1111 �I --- 1 I. ®�� e........ ../ --- NM l _ .. I ."1 I I.: :FIT:k= �>x.:�.._ . E M1P@ ---f��EGFtoE@6589 ��., �\ !/. fl I9 .... `°� =cc=_r --rn._! »r....►.1'CCat_wC =r3 3" s.GC� Co - 6� Iln ml :911: -rL. •:.__ p1 =EEe:EI EI-�..� :F SG======�51e=n@cnmataRi®-. aro,� Now Cat- 1 nrr a>r rA.0 WEST ELEVATION SOUTH ELEVATION MP'"1,, a .- Nag cols v coke ELEVATIONS - co.r cTc rD BC ....wm 1.,;.,-v LAyxr Y-eo4 r. 4...0 7o ee a:x.v>..v ' -• /pvi.4//Q.MX TO BE o4tA'A. PIONS.s.TNN7FD ...re aF p...E-G+ID1,r - C/7a. �1'PRNR/ATE _o9Z OF C•e'io • • • A[[dlJ, . ngtry.7' r ee n4#ME0 ....._ . I-4Nr VLW-GEi1C. ATTACHMENT #10 A4 • • . _ ___ . . VILLAGE . . i • r-,51 1V-CF TO'-o. 3 s'-0" a a-0 er" TO-0. 2C/-0. SO'-0' a et- acr.-0.- . '.. \1, 1 1 I I f 1 t t i ".-°. '`-° -------- . - ----- ------- --PLACE------- ------ --------- ----- - - -- --- NORTH 1 . . • • • • 1. • RENTON.WASHINGTON I SIMON VILLAGE ASSOCIATES • 1 • D If D 1 Callison ,II 110 E. HECK D TEL. M 1 -,..--.-. • • . ‘-111—.41.jj • w I I . ...„ 10Y .........-... .....-._- ; .... 'Z''..2...7... =W.V... • • • • • • • ...-.-.-,___., ............• , 1:, • -. .-....••-". . * . . . • • •'- • TYPICAL FLOOR PLAN .• • . • • : • : I . - . ; 1 : ; . I -711 . • - PASSEHGER CROP OFF -1--1.-1--. i • - . . . -. r I I . • . • IL.- • e 1 L'-'--7- ---- ---- : • I I //') .....'N I • - . . • : I , • ' :'I • 1 •-I 1 : -'-'11-41--."-;-7-: , , *-ri- • •• —Al , *- , . k - . 1.e-r.1.....3,---K 1-I1 . - • ! 7--- -—r r r-:- * ( • I : 1 I -- 1. • '7-44 • -----— ... 1....1 r I__i •. _ J. • e- - ' ---— . • • L-.1.-• . I 7 1 .1 . . • --- . • • • • ! ' : : I ._______ • L I, vAr hi PO TEN1111 RES-TXURANT 1.-•......................P.o.r..) --/ IL- OFFICE I I • • -•---— _ ....-- . . I . .. . ! I i • • • • • . • 1 " . , PUBLIC.TEAR a • /1 .1.1i JAM.17:_i ,(71 . , •, ____ •=1 I I I —1 —1 - -- _ . _— . 7 ....-..... e - I I 1 : , , • I I--1 -1---. 1 , •e •TEL I 1:•-..t./..P.'ff'‘ , la • /11 • T T 1 / ''I _, ...fif-Ler..._.........._ • 1 ii . _ • ...ix . ..........4.c c.... T T LI ,_......••• -•----— \....... , r- 1.....C.144.10~ II I ; e•ei...........4 . ........ / , *IT PMSAGEWAY l• . — SERVICE bORISOCR / , SERVICE AREA - 1 i 1 —. . • - v-ti r,;....--,, PIETAS-I RETAIL 2 RETAIL 3 PETAL A RETAIL 5 I /*TAR I PETAL? RETAIL A PETALS . -. -.-- -- ....,......4.* _i_i : 1_,._._i_ 1-----' --1-4-j-1--i-i--i- -4—!=-1 .-.,...,. , 1 --r"---•=C---.7-7-7.----t-----'7-7-------.--,- ---•r------'-r' 4.--'..,--=._.._1_ '%,-..*:.____,...._: 1 1 • ,-1 , , . . • FLOOR Pl:MS vi,......... . . . GROUND FLOOR PLAN a ____ - __ - -- - - -04 e-6-10— . ........... ' • ATTACHMENT #8 A2 I .....--,..........__ . • , . - . • . . . . . ' . . . . . . . . . . . • PLACE _ -- - VNTLORLTAHGE _ . .1 - , ROOF CECK RE\l'ON.7,A.SVINGTON . ILF-KTONVLLACEAH•v,TES . . 1:11 \ [1 0 OD d 0 I . I I ' . z'Aigv....e Calks°. I ELEVATOR PENTHOUSE .....rf,0.0...,1.1: LECH.O.CAL FNCLO i. I I . ..........- •-•...-... ...,,s' I ' -' ''' -----,---1 ' . . . . • • Ma I I /r/4.$4.417,./v....c.. . ....,... ....,.. ...v....v..— . ; i ..-. ...... . =L..7.1.v. ...."....".Vor. 1 . •.............., . . .1.1165 1 I 1 , 1 i . . . _ . . i . . CANOPY • — — • . . . . ROOF PLAN . . . . . . . . . . . . . .......... • .. - - . - .. • H. x_-- •---- •-. 1E- .-- ... . • ' ROOF DECK I . . . . U----ii . x • • • , • • -— . . . .---- , --"aTi'.'; ,f-V:e.f,t'r. 2:-..;•'HO r=t-,S.-,-,,..t_ . ----- . 1 'I d. ,,,,,, ,A,EX.,o..<AK.,,,,,S. - .—— ---- .. ... .•• . . • '• • • . 0 r. ..._._. . . • • • • • i i ........_.._ ._ .- _ •-___________--• a . .. • . . TENTH FLOOR PLAN • . , . • FLCOR PLANS . . . . . . :'/....••,-, . . . . . • • • e....,::-.51- .S.D...t. .... • • f • .- . . I ATTACHMENT#9 A3 _.........___ -•-......----- . . • . . ?A '( . . . t . _--, _. ..._._____. ..__.. . . .1 VIL, _ . .__. _ _ . LAGE - NORTH , •. . RENTOH.WAS4W4070N TTA.... 'E: . caaafJ4. karraa'n..1...a.km09.110 . • 1 1 f.a.Shi ; 1.07.0-Z WANG6 P AN'ELS T/a1.5 P.43 60: • -.L SI ' lig • I ,.. ,...i,i 1 ' br , \, ___.,.........-, ... .=.,........... CaJI‘on . -7-- . - --r---:-. .--------- ---------.--'-r".----- '. .. "'r.;..*77,7.".'7./'''''4,."/:400.4:;;;.;W.Ii•VA.;;P,4,%;%'4,407%:::',•'44%.;OW;;':A?'',..;•",,'• -•"!:''V°00.:*• •-•—• . .,•=1-.. ,. .-- i..•' • . _prow • '" •• .. •..?''"•."":*••••'.. •••• •=31110 -IIIMIIIIMMWP+tl4.4origt.r!A.w.•rsa---°',7"Pr7-7*--. • - - .7-*- - 1 -• • r • ,•• - • 4. • 4 I , litur am - .g.....4111.111111"11 , ••,1.. •. :. ... -,•'_, ' : -.. '•- iliehysigiei v :--'10:- , Re,,•-, -..„...-....- - • N, n,'"•••• .: ' " A.g.,t,t.•w:ttmai—,-- ---,•,-,wy5,77- 41• -."2.z ..."?....." • •:.. .........- ,• . . . ." .. ..'-cr ,--+-It 1 it‘.• -weal._ / .- --• .•• i•• ..`.1 •S1 -- ,1-• ,•,.. ' ' .?.r.*--4.trkt v4*.° 1•1116"—Mr ellePt3e0 t... .4.cfsP • .. :.!«...6.. 4. .IV.'ea k6--‘/MV- 0,tr'-' • :•'•• t ..iiiri, •'"itleatiligite ..2"-5.- -:.'"- ----- )10 -Ar---•'" i41 .•,_.• . '', --_.••• .lt•—•0'tsk.::•.:•:-. ..... .... -' .--,..- - -f.....-11.--• -....5P -0.- •••?;•4•;%./•••••••,10Q",,,aii,trI4s0;•%--,Z,:ex, f.,... . :,, xti;l!..zt-. t`-'...t1,141.: •,-.1.2fa____.1.____.'' 77 - • z-a..----.--- - -— 7--.--- -...... .m1111 ..t.IMIR.cgoinia.moamtit' Mali 141......-- ..a=1:4•. ••.,. . . -. .,_,........___...... , 0 laa-Tr.A-Waora,, 144' '',' Y. . MA.Aberif 07.17 . --- , rm, ,,A, Z. 0 O. Taw,CE oldet4e" lz, e. .r....... re....e 4.....,,.., leAruce QE 17 ,G*-rv.e.e T.4441,4C-Pa ',4.1.5 VIA..A.AY: ur..er • , .. 171r .44 fP,A.6-10 ne-Ys..t.Ay: Peax.A.,•1 n,To.56- .1, ,,. ...,ii . kfr .. ,.. ..-•=1' s''. Y.z.,... . L.- .. ...••• L‘ '‘...':"...i.t•Ir s"' 1:1:,V..,:i. ...: . ;...!.. . '‘\\14UMNNZR‘N.WkNk IM,}nota‘14gWCNNMN.:=7:Cit7:2; 1 _J 1 ,9_ aligaim _ . Vall‘II,'IVA 1- , ......3:,.s,,,r...4,......,.‘,..,,,,,,,,,,,• .4,,,,, .;...,....,..:&-ao,. ,l4,40 if.T.Air.42111,g.-,r. IgEl.,r42544sgiury ....,.-.........-•-- .+e fcw.....v..z.,.e.. -.g....krfm/65. .tiiiilinr,,s, ,__ ' .• _ _ ...._4 ; -.._— . .. illiM4 lieee rilatiffil, ....m._!1„.„:101iiiie ' ,, •--4,---'''--,:lf,',---;••• ,77Trl.••:•!: 1',I',-........17,:.W.1:!:::.9:•P• i I.1- • _vp ••••'44c: "si‘t: `7r-.7 . -:',77----,`sii•::-.X'i 7,.,.,t _ ii ...1111•041111IIIMINE01". .411=ett mak R asestuirglowt.te.„itrj .:. ,,,„ ,..•-• , ..., . _..,-.4 ." ,_..._. ___,,er. prifit, ______ t. ..• ••::,,r•-rnif-70,171,, •4-7,1 / _;.,zis, ,.'„%,_ ...,, ,•17: 4J'.•‘.‘• ,.11. r77 ,,.1.....'3 .7' illaii "''''" aliiis.. "altedailtarliiiiilliglaiLIMIS'E".- 1 - i _ -- 0 moil-EtzvA-rhoY 0 mv/Y VA ELEllo,/ Yfiqpr,e' - - —- - - — . ' ------r --1 I . 1. •----...—•-•-- - , 1 7 p..ea,..4 ,424.5.,/ • 1 . kula.taal i ..._ I -I -ri, TV44 -- CAE TO i I kr.ceri prim.a.{, •nn,0,'^f• ! . 7-07.26",..f...r„.e-ro I 74. TAT.,6,7: I .-- ,....c<2.4/4 Tk. f ef.,. I /vw.17..4 57- zoo,.P.WEL S.sec . 1.0.1.1/7,,,1 7,1. i -rweeets GP 444..46". I ' J.V I I 0 . .---, ...• .... '"s'"'". ''.. .' "..N-.-.''' ‘"Ali1~111Nerillellrill."11.11.4111111111W11.81111" 'MENININIMIEMIOSMWIM- miii-'721iiiiiiiiiiIIIIIIIIIIIIMNIIMENININEAM -• l iz •...:•;••• ke.eFs■.—r,.--m••MNMINBElwRefrMNt"M""M"Il"" MR"E"'.1.i --- ---,-:--, , .... - :. ,! GARAGE MIME '1 ELEVAT1CNS ' . imiMeniown ommumisalaviummellimilM11.1111111111111—..f79 , - •----=4R—! . -.. • . • — • • • •- • .. ••••?..K1F-.zfirie• • •- - i 4.•• ' 111.1‘....- ' "Art' ' — — 1101.64_22L -.. ;,•' 'sJ• ., e' • re ":41s: k'A VIIIMIBINIII li.4.4•.____. LI .1 .., 1_I 4........A 1•.1 _ • .. , ,r."-t ,"--v-r. . A, .r": .., . ..• . .., , , ... , ...- •`0111111111 ' • •-* , - ----- - - ...-•-m --R. yeur.r- ......,...4,..-... ... ::....-:,....,......1;,..: t• mio .: ,....i....i.„.....,..... ...... —.•.0111.11.10"--.....- - " mallsomann -...• .. ! . i , - :2.,„_.L_ f_i2__.• ii,... . • .5 ,Ac.4S.scaA __....._ .. •••=••••••• •••••• V • . • . . A 5 • .• • ,r--vA 1...rd 07'51 • ATTACHMENT#12 -J... a. .•••••••••••,............. ... , - • ..._......... . V . . J • VELLA GE -- • PLACE . . NORTH • . , . . R12•71"OS WASHLNGTOS UNTO:,,ILLAGE ASSOCIATES esvis\f..._ .- Ko cTAE— /46L— (Allison ....,--.72--:, r....7:-. . .. . • . . •. ...„.-_,...r,....,.,....__ . tr.t...-.--... ZT•Tir,t,. . . . . . _ , I,(.... n.....n7._0 -te • 1 I • , . 54‘.....4 ka ._......./ F--- _., Ig ..\ ............, $ . . . Fi , I\ - ..., • ; - . i ,.•• : --- : - • ...,2•••,..„0.,up,...0/0.4Lohin .1.IG. ue I ot-c. 6-. . Ve ' . I • •...— 1 I- . . • 1.../...• 'Lc....10 11 - • .tr .•,• ...vs ...g, •.,, . t ..,7DC.- • 11/C_,, /......0/93 :• I 1.It v. ti4,141 ,a• ,'I'.11. ts' u'l• ,.........,,,...4. ,...r.I.Jcero ...I r......, •:--.----1 -.. I . —II' ..........., .,- 7 1.1, ; i DJ 1 : tr.F. 1-.. ',!: .. . 62.....Q,a3) - lowC. — .. ii7..1,44E5 [4:5444 - I L44 Ia -C44.4E 1: 4— 1 1.4 moot. - - 1.0.4) 144,0 ....-----............Ci• 1... ; ,.2—,.--/— . . . ... ..... , ' -----------" • ...GT,-........1...... . r/ *\....... i • . in^"•••“'"T . . ,...,,c.. m am -.D.E.L'a 6") . 1....... 17 .......,„,... ;3,..\:-. . ... ....na••••no" • KM: cl....41,) de n_ I.e.ti • 1=1. •-----4 v.....-......1.......L.I. I ,,,,,,,,,,. 1.‘ t....•6- 5 1(I.e.-Kr,14.41.4.1‘. . 4444440 0-e.410....fii •••5) r...9 ...g„:4,.".. ii) .--,..,• .,...e9F , ...........-. .0.1,.../ . ....LA.- • b..=1./.4 . • klb.SE.,........1 6.4eng. 4.-...-. ! ...-,, 7 12,. Ns 5.44.4.5.555 21•F........ri...a.: ',IT...0.•1.1., N N . 1 1.4,1410E5.4 >15,,,L,y.,E 1,ow sirE,tg AtestifonS. ''' • 1 5-41 554434.4-44,,"...1-ea,44.44-1S . /..• A . - - ...'t,Y \ ' MI • i 7. ..'''• in . 1 -- Or-r-a.Z r.40I44•44 .,...,..,, be......00 r•flear.4.4.4444,44, 0 LEVEL 6 PLAN 0 LEVELS 2.3,4,5 PLAN 0 GRADE LEVEL PLAN ,,.......,,....s. ./.,. ............• GARAGE PLANS 1.1.0 e......-e L.....514 1,544 ,4ro e'r....'"'"04.4.4445-044,5".5 4-4. usc .r.• ....cr .....rorA.... '7 tr0....5,...ee.,114,°CD Ill 54-ftez.I.kimenue. c•••• I''''St. l'-:::''I'-''.1,17" "II* trA4...4.4.o. 4_SO[4,4,44, ' L,, i ......6 I I.) e 6 121i ?V ct-f.......I..1... i 1, 1...e,,,,,5,i, creoh,,c Mai.6,.11-07.. 5,, Ye/co.—.- 6.%,.....,69) r44:-.1.....- 14M-11 '• --•• • • .Na. 5 c...-••••4 e7 57 14.1- ..... it:'-fig.a vi-2'''''''''''s" . •........• T4TAI... 7,4- 3,3 got III 5•44.03, ,uin C....14 ATTACHMENT#11 6.3.4-k A4.5 . . . • . • . I....4...e-- VILLAGE • . • ,,,,...,,.., • 1 . • PLACE • 0 - • 1 0 . . ' ? ._ • T ' 1-0 AC 6-72. , ‘,,,,,..i.,,.— -..7-,.-.-- — NORTH •, c.„,,,,,,i,,,,,,- See k9 I 1 FUNRE.4 Ara, On. I NCW itzvy ey r19.6vir: .5.'rEi), I . e+ I RENTON.wASHLNGTON AS_VI•OK VILLAGL ASSOCUTL3 . 1--— - —----—-,-•-•^• • .— .•••- c . .,•.. \ '..m. .. _. • . _ . .•. .. . - ft:,',,,,:!. ." - :.t. . :: .. . • ...7.....—. —i- ' ,--- . .,.,.....2,,.c.PLYHeY. \,...EY.,01Z v 4 e.fliga,...ze. • . AWED. rn. v/AINC714.. PL.57V OyYTEH.. . .— • CI) re,ineET14...t.wv-r. we,ca,v,reve.ra,y ,.5E.47 ... ..4 ( Sco e i.,E.,,ot,W-Xte-770/1,,. ,y.,,,..m. 1y0. (ewsrory L...,4/er Fa7vR-E- 7 _r _ : - -7----=______ ..__ 777 — _----- bA., .....---:: . . ;C'7' -7 4., _. -: • • . • = ••• •.___„,,,,..,... . • • _••_ _ . • • • •• • ..•- - -... . ••• --. .. • - _ . •••- - 1 i • . .A. LA. 1 ESL . .._...___i_ Ea. i0. 4 i .1.—_..._.._. ... — 0 weSi-el..15,ATI OrY I - • —. • . li.e,ii.,^ .,,,,,aNer. /20.15,C)).,e,1 .• 70 BC A...WC," ,-..0,-r 4RXY-Jee-x.,.-. ' 00.0.4.61,100 TILE-ro,,e . ..___ • ER..t.E-G.,...eW kx-4A- • ••--- . r„,,,„.,, J.,......n- emm..,,,,,. ol.,a'4(.55 C.,..Z....r0 wf.r2.0 EX.e3=n•Cv. - --— ...-...-... ' •".Y.Z! ,. ---,L,14/-3".. . . ••••- . . 0004.-...NO Ida, • I . 0 ® 01)1011C17.. ? (1) 4.i.m.1.4.4 w 1 ExisT4 r../e5rx.e..rwl 7 . ..r....t. . :.,.,0 r„...,.....-. 12, 6S 1../1.100 I TY, 3.03Ee 1 •SCE ._.)C1 I •i I i I ! 1 , . I ___ —._..._ ...._..._.. _ • . -'1".- n 6 .44 .-S7 . . /1- - _ ••*. 1 —_--.- ..,..,...7. ---- •,.......,-----. - . — '''' ...; ^ STRIP CENTER • = 41 1___ ....,,‘*"- •••• ,-.4:--;-,--,-*:. • ELEVATIONS -IP, \c=s- --- ;Z,.5 t•• 7-rda2,-r-'73:3;ftts- „:'.••••••A“-. -5--, . ;47e.- --. :.f. L- - -F1------- •., z..' . . -• .- 'fl.':- 'Alki;.....:...'4:::;;;;"...11...... ......7;.::,;'!:.:'N.,.1 '„c:..?...?"\-:: i'•!-:::\,:'::' 'z 777 — •-- •!. , • s-1 c..7.! :- '7.:l'13te.L.-=•• -friiC-. r• ::": .7. :7 k-- . .: -,--. .—! T-1,1414,R,RT „..______ ,._ —--- 84o”--;1 . . .act MSs, W.,q4,..",e ......" i zil-e: I .1 L Lk, 2A.:t.-- 1•••• 00N•0'100.al-AITE.D. . I I .-... . - • • A6 0 NS-V7- ACLEVA-77•A/ - ATTACHMENT#13 , • I . YeetaLo" -.......,.....-...--- . . . • • I hV6.'2. SNAlfiRAK AVE. auiuimiiiii� 'IN 17 h.GfAD/ uJAy • • n1ifflI 1 1 - TYPICAL - �•_ / _ /^,I . : ii . )4.. . / i (------,_____ ...___ _ 1• N f ) w�=�� / �_�I i r / EXISTING {� ! / ��. .ti r / 1 FEMA EXISTING ! ! / / ' •1 �- o /�, ! • ��H�, PARKING ! / j / i I GARAGE I ' • . • . / / / ' / I T S + / / I ^ _ � (4• / /OFFICE/RETAIL + .. / FLOOD COMPENSATING STORAGE(FCS) i'M1•',• ,.,,/// / / TOWER k ,: - / ' J / Y / I o9 ` RETAIL �:::/ r r. • IE%ISTYiG 1 I (' 'an 111111 w.••+C +�' / 'A FEMA 24.0\ I /. �. \ _ - .• ..•- . . . oN.Tt+r (IsJuxr:reM,Y` 1� / \ I 5 uw` lelI wa`. r f''i f :,c. ,Minw.n. %/• 0••�>. / I • RETAIL �� .�. r��.]] :...•: ,. ..y.y... :. �.'� GARAGE FLOOR FCS TO 6' I ���/ F...................... I. ( _ • 1,[, - `.'V ;=> •v' ,,.Nee.."-9>. _q •';tee�. / '•/.I' .....�� \ ; O gig•>,,��,..en '40 / / i t>.,�' br+�+� /,.,w xM+« �� FNEFLOW f • Y' i _.L.1 �� i BYPASS ( J LA f'6fDl�lD flIDD(Dfirt?;JSWx'1LTf+�((Jif.�(ONCEP( \•I� \ir / �' _ • _ ` _ I - i / e`11 IiTJ p{v..xl. J _ \ ' V ` i i r 0/WS•STORM.. - --• Ili = . • JTo EXIST 0/Ws _ io cPni•-1 t',./44 i --' -'0 ki) • \4.5 / ., :t* - _TO EXIST O/W 1�1° ,E TEHO 4_..-�- `�E�ti ••' V / ��' _ REVISE✓ ' \__ - ; Y ^7 �a .. WATER ` \ __`• W n V \ •l FlXrERO510N • . .. • _ '�� _ '-.•rr�,V _.I ^ �+ 3` 1 i1 • p`'� > H ..4 r^'--- .' /^_ , P COMPENSATING STORAGE CONCEPTS i ••+ -_�` - _ CONCEPTUAL • ti ;'� ..:/�,a1,4 e ~` ` ��- - 151,900 CF EXISTk7G 100 YR FLOOD PLAN VOLUME STORM el` \ y�-L^ �_-.'�.�\ .-�__ •_` �l r-_..` 'I':• ..rw 51,900 CF F'LFISTING 10YRFL00 DPLAN VOLUM DFiANAGE • -`- P �~'�_�. --` -�ti• `/ V OH •, e7,100 CF COMPENSATNG STORAGE(FCS)REQUIRED l - _ --{Zip YI Fl%EROSION _.- .- ...=.. FLOOD PRO `4 I►'"_.. \ ___ -_ 22,000 CF Fkl'!72-l.lE i MANHOLES PLAN • • "•J + 22,700 CF GARAGE FLOOR ...-\' ‘ • • �Ci'ID�,! CJx'� I{:Ca{(ID W I ARMOR CItAN EL��JI�: :_ -I- /� A / -'A,• \ i. 55,900 CF UNDERGROUND FCS ^' .. 7 90,900 CF 10e%OF REO(1REMENT ..n ir .1.,.;. .z.c......._ '7-... .---i-_....--mo„,...__..s.-_.,....-___ ......--- . . .___!%'::---- "". • :', • . 11.•••••••••••••••••• ,...._...-. ‘cikAffkllA AO. wt.nv6.,2. ,' ,- :.__,7; T • ••,.., ,_ ,._ .,,., . h.6VAVNI WAN ,.. .11',.. C701 Y ---------------------' ... ,_, • . .... ....\ ""2 ... __. •s IL A Z •: '. J..... 'i 1 • , ,f‘...7.........."..).. 1 • I • i ! I (1 -...... -.--.-._ ,j .... • irk ... • -------.----_,s 7 1.1_4•__-_- - .v mt- . '"1:-.... .:,.....-;- %-% •--.. •., • P / . •,44,..6 i••,a, -.. , • .....-4 I 1 : • ."FL••' - .. / r-:- : : • ;,.. I... ,, i.5• . ...,no....•w......e) ' • .. _.'..' .- I •---_, . PZOf Af 1 -......___ ,14.069/44.4 : r PARKING SIZLI-- , • . , X1 r• --1.11 .• I , • • • .../j', ............./zzr,4 Gl4ARAGE / • / .,....,..( ,,.„, . . s-"" • C.A.,...FIto . J •.._ . . i, .14•2; 11...S.!'.....% . I1 ,-... ...„.. i 'N'A„"9r i ',',M, P 1 - ; i 124)"' / , ; , • ° ``' I,' , OFFICE/RETAIL , I , . 1 ) •d„„............................," t" / i;,'/ I. TOWER ...t"'•... .7 LI C...”( .. .1 ff•1,.., ,...."''' H.,•%, , . i 4---, ...•k i .•VW /• I • • V, , I . R:E.T,A I L ; : / f.,....„ i • *-3- •Corp: 1.4._•:.,., I / /--- ...-. "..: µ.4•%,..: k..,,i -/ '!L ,.''Ittr4&•'-',4,4, - .- . ; ... , ., ; - :i t.4•••t4..4 4l) e I I' RETAIL ----- / , / •k•-•swe oixose, I pc....,,n rife . / ' , y ,.....,,. If•LAP , .- . I .A it,UoP • i ‘--••,. :.,,,,,.. ...............______7 I 1 i '4.* , -.• 1 A .2-7. . .__,..„_________0.\\•-. - • ,OrrA-IS I comr6,35knot.,r, ! !../ / 7-,,0.- , __. %:W.% i,hi..../.4(Ic4) 0 41 . • -..""-•..,-• \ s"...\ s , .."''''4'..•Jh .1 146'' .P' ' =V/ r.) : % • r 65,1.cr s) , 9' x • •_ I. •,r ; ••___________ ••K i I 1 - \ \ .,. 4. : \....-- _._•----4-'-'---- ....-I .("-- . m6.094 A,,,..06 ‘ : ii*\ i=,,',2k,,,,.. •-•1 --,,..„,-<_,.."...... 3.7.'71;•./ - 9 V) '... •Mrttl.1.1A. • . % ,, e r\- rx,rawg 4,, ... ,r.:-----..., \ / - - -,...„.. Id .. • OX.1.00.47-• ..- pirtreA tF PI .2 <7 g _.. \,T!...),!•,. H „E • .• ,ft, . . • . %W.:.4..COMc•Ls.:::"' .1, • ' of 6......6c.0 cs./.• - ., -. -__ I 41 --..? i .... VI ''. " , . 4•404.0.9x. .co.:,y4 0 . .. . . ; i; ?,11.r4.2c.ct,ti..W •-.c.., • . . \ - . •.. '.,ylOPOON..f.11.010 . \ .. sk..k Parett,, 04 04 ,.% .:,. --.,• .... •nen,•ai 1..... • \ \I, i I r L.*V;f v..•...as• .• • • . pt.•1.•ao CI) I!) ; .a t•..• ..----•'-----1.---------':' di • •• U . . • / 'I'S.;Ki.Y.CIA‘1..H..4" •••• .. i i;• 7 . " - • • • . - • • %.. e i' 1 --:":"..---• Li • • ' . • • . • k i • . •• • • if. Lc- L.) - . ..... : ..., ;; - • . • !E. • , tl,' Z pl 2 .p.... ...... . . . ..___ •n. ;••••- 1.11.. -• O gi . V.r ../ ' •" -........ ) 1 . • ..••• !...1' *"....---:.4etr--: '.--- . - • . ,--------- --...._.."-)..c1'....4.0..:-:41)‘..,11 Ifrve....1-.'.04.01.':........1.0.."-------C.......,::./....: _...::...._/7 . ... / —1 ---- •,... ----.........,... An.40...Y.,. • lanualOOM.Whin. •..........„.... • fl. • L.LI R O i V .... _ • =kf-egirli:w • t-.- -_.. , WL)_ ,. .... • , , ,,j'-----,---;-•.:.•••-. cl ••• -•/'•• --- '''k,..---; 4. •-•/ • -,,,:- -' . -..;•• ...c.I, -...Z.,....'-........................, • • . 44'/ I." .-.., -•••••-,.- -.••'-- .".• . .; . I :"rt.?'" , ' •/,: 4. .., • • • ....4*I Vg.r.(10 We • • li Iit ' •1 . .:. =It:4.., 1,174.11 .... r.... .. ...- ' ,....,...-2. ,•:,1k,e..114 4.. (.. .•... ...I ini Mie iliAL 617)5A . • 95,4INA6E• ---.... • . • ----1-''14- --tzz....-... --- / ---.• 7- --.' f . • -.... • ,.. • -... . . WI)- ... . ...... .... - . - ----- - - - . _ __. . - - . . ......1.10.01.1.(t.,.....f/rA .-. • WorrilioN1 • - -.... _ RAN a n‘.7••••••••.WP, . _ ____ _ ?PHAN %1.;P.1(.4tAY W• 1 --...._.-_:..... ..• 1...! _ . • 1,1 A7R 4 0 =.711 __ _ - --••_. . JOB 0.9008 • . .... ...... Wag,Annan II.nle9n9. ------- Csf---% —..../ c.......r..) —•••-...... 2 ... ,.„..........,,_ --_...... . ..t.7•..... all...IL CIT'.- OF RENTON • Finance Department Earl Clymer, Mayor • April 16, 1991 CERTIFICATE OF MAILING STATE OF WASHINGTON) ss COUNTY OF KING ) MARILYN J. PETERSEN, City Clerk for the City of Renton, being first duly sworn on oath, deposes and says that she is a citizen of the United States and a resident of the State of Washington, over the age of 21 and not a party to nor interested in this matter. That on the 16th day of April, 1991, at the hour of 5:00 p.m your affiant duly mailed, and placed in the United States Post Office at Renton, King County, Washington, by first class mail to all parties of record, notice of appeal of Hearing Examiner's recommendation filed by Thomas A. Goeltz, representing Davis Wright Tremaine Law Offices, File No. SA, CU-078-90. Marilyn J. t sen, City Clerk • SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE me this 16th day of April, 1991. V6ruk_ (\\- NectiQQ, Notary\Public i anc or the St to of Washington, resi ng in \p • "flit !r • • 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 . ck! floc CIT. OF RENTON ailL Finance Department Earl Clymer, Mayor April 15, 1991 APPEAL FILED BY THOMAS A. GOELTZ, DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LAW OFFICES RE: Appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision, dated March 5, 1991, regarding Site Plan approval (Renton Village Associates) for Renton Village Center, South Grady Way (SA, CU-078-90). To parties of record: • Pursuant to Title IV, Chapter 8, Renton City Code of Ordinances, written appeal of the hearing examiner's decision on the referenced matter has been filed with the city clerk, along with the proper fee of $75.00. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the written appeal and other pertinent documents will be reviewed by the Council's Planning and Development Committee, and the recommendation of the Committee will be considered by the City Council at a subsequent Council meeting. The Council secretary will notify all parties of record of the date and time of the Planning and Development Committee meeting. If you are not listed in local telephone) directories and wish to attend the meeting, please contact the Council secretary at 235- 2586 any weekday after 1:00 p.m. for information. Sincerely, d'h ' ,,/,)11417 vkt Marilyn J. sen, CMC City Clerk • 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LAW OFFICES 2600 CENTURY SQUARE • 1501 FOURTH AVENUE • SEATTLE,WASHINGTON 98101-1688 (206) 622-3150 THOMAS A. GOELTZ CITY OF RENTON (206) 628-7662 April 12, 1991 APR ' 2 199 NECEIVED CITY CLERK'S OFFICE City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 Attention: City Clerk Re: Appeal of Hearing Examiner Decision in SA/CU-078-90 Dear Clerk: Enclosed is a Notice of Appeal of the Hearing Examiner in File SA/CU-078-90, along with a $75 filing fee. The Examiner's final decision in the Request for Reconsideration was issued March 29, 1991, and this is submitted within the 14-day appeal period. For your convenience, we enclose a "copy ready" version, as well as the official Notice of Appeal. We thought this might help in copying for the individual Council members. Very truly yours, DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE Thomas A. Goe tz TAG/ss Enclosures GOELT\00856.D20 Seattle • FAx: (206) 628-7040 • TELEX: 328919 DWJ SEA ANCHORAGE, ALASKA • BELLEVUE, WASHINGTON • Los ANGELES, CALIFORNIA PORTLAND, OREGON • RICHLAND,WASHINGTON • WASHINGTON, D.C. _____________ — CITY OF,EAFS TON CITY REGIRC:FT : f 2-16157 04-12-1991 CASHIER ID • C 3:42 _ —____ _________________________ — — $75.IaCt 7016 HEARING EXAMINER li}1711iii-t 11114_1,► 71_1,1141.33�i.5+.f1ti1.4- ----r----_---- TOTAL DUE $75.00 RECEIVED FROM: DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE $75.00 CHECK -------------- —$7 .i0 ------- TOTAL TENDERED !�tl.1„411 CHANGE DUE ;).-.}sI111=!li:-=iil- !I1`=.lil=III--:Ili:=-=11i-11i=.=ill=:ll •-=ui. _li!=-III=lif===Ili= 111-:=:lil.=!11=7.7-nn I',-; = I .I ==li,• / -:it II - f i=- I I 1 1 = 111 =111 -III li!'==III --ii! ,11--- ii- Ili = I! .;II 111= III =- n I'. !. 5Q0 4._6�4� 1-- GO'EiLT lo) Y ,• Anlo�Pa• . ,. ,-.a,' -.-' '. .,a, • ,DEDUCTIONS i I /. AMOUNT , / _ -=-!11=,11i==111-;i1=L:WI -1I1i-==.1i1�= _=111:=.111.==-.il =!11',== 1i!.= I1,-=.lil= .1;1:--Iii= III,"=!1i 111= }i_1, ==-lil-=ili - li,- C tyiliof'iRenton l=--,,11!=11172=2III=-:1I1.=t--!1!=-,;1,=_ 111=-111:==!ii 11!==i11. - i!1:= _i11.-=11! =11i=-:ll!.==lli .l, il--- 1: �IAI ! II I -I _ 1i=-1 (- =l11.. ! - I �I - _! I_--lil'- 1 --- IJ:-- 11==III - - 1=_-III= 11 -- - II'-_.11 peal H-fee,---.111.--,11 11=.i�t=,111:; :i 1.=-_,..11.- 11 ,,:.!;.:,,:Ill:-- 1::y 1__ I:I „1 - (I:.,;, 11= -=1i1.-,=!_±.�,�. :11 #30---g- 1�1 -1!I- -Ili.-=i!l:=1!�==111-_ill-=i i=111F ;i1.---i!.O•OIII,= - il===1il--.iii'--III-=!I!=--11I'=,111=-=!II-=7!51-00;--- I,__ _ I _ `' _ I_ - -- --=•lip 1.--'ll - _ I I I :1 1- /7 II! :-lWI:1-=-111=;-1i1� ;.I11==111:=III= 111;_Ill.;; , �i11.;- J_;=111 -:.LI 1'TIII-7 11 =1.1 I.-;=11!,--..21.-1=;._.i,1._ !-1 1_•L I '==1!'= 111 11;:-1:I:=1.1-III: -!1i :ill.=:!1 1( -111. ill= !li 1J;:: -1!i.=-111.== 111= III;=111 !1H111==,11 ='11.-=:! . L''11==III---I11==!i!-_111.=1-!► -1117-E-:.11!,=,III:~il!:==.111 .11 -==1111 ,11': i!=-!i1.=-:,'11 ==-111,==i :-==j11:=.11 ,=,111==,111 T11i:=.111= 1 =-!1!•=1i1= -i11==ii1-11i=J!I-11-=!11==-111= III==111= 1!i= 111-H.--i!i=- -;i;=-.1!1=J11.=-111=III =!Ii .1i1,111=:1ii ,1! 11 - IC-- '11=•I1'=-111=11;=111= 111=111==!i!=i!1'll =-.111=- =i'i-= !1= .1!i=--=i!1=i!l.;, -J!L--=!ii= J!!= II -1i1=i1i== If1-!l .-.211.-==.,1,.-1i1.=-t1I.-.111:T1.---111-=,i'I !1!. !1.=: 1=i11=111=-111.-1'1=-11 fi-1 =!'1=-=111- 11f=111 1i1:==:i11 w-! L 1 1 _._I - i .1!1.-=!11:=i!1:=Ill ill:=.iii.=.1'11 11i:==,l11=-.11!=1.111==.11 11!.= lii= 11:==,1!1-=;i1.1==.11; ---, ! ._=;111==!11-= hi.==1i1==.1!1. i1C�=. H-111.= 1'1,=!!I:=iLl,=ill : li..= III =.111: i11-=i11= 1iiE 111==.I{1 i11.==•111=i1i:= :Ili==ili:,=,ili ,1!1=-!11=-III.==:1!'=-=:1:`I::=;.1 I: -=�11!.-!!1==111=111.111==.Ili=111=-111,-,1!L=I =.III=.1i =i!1:=.III ; 11. -.111,==-,11':==.II1=�i11 =-.i11= , = 111.- ,1111;=.1;1: =,i11. 1'.-i'1===111--11!=i11.11i:-=llf.-.'li.==-I!1==!11i11_-III===!11 -=:i1!,_, :- 11-.11! -11.1=-1!! ==1ii:=ill- .,- l'1-1 I_-;1;=; 1 !: di=2J11==.1!1=,Ili.=.!11.=---:i 1 111-==.i11. ,!11 =- ;1.-'1: --,11 =.J11,.---.11.-=. 11---111:7. 'I!. =.J1I=-=.'1! ==.1!I:T'.1J1== jl!===11!.=.!ft- i :ll.'--111---'ll---lu• - : ,l-_III•.-_Itl..-_,111_._ lil---III-_11 -_111- -111-II;-- III-.- tll-_ ,,I•--II1- _li1_-...iii---,,,_..__ili_-:lu_ _ill-----' 1--- -;1i_-•III---.�,II--III--'1'L ill.--";111---;III,---.Hi-III;--lI --'ill,-'111:'-`l1;---Itl--.,II---i'�',-- - 4;,---'�,--I;I----,II;---- III----;I'---Iii--P; - ::1: --•DAVIS WRIGHT_TREMAINE'�` I 1 I-DETACH•,AND_RETAIN THIS STATEMENT 1 I THE'!ATTACHED_CHECK!!IS-IN(PAYMENOE I ITEMS(LISTED-ABOVE__ ---111---- 111=-- -1.----1 l 1-111- ill:-_-_-:I--i .-=.111---=.111.==111.--='I I-I I -.111:-I I,_-.,,I:-=.I I II ,-i = I i I a______-- 1;1= 111- 1 • f'E. - • . fit. WRITTEN APPEAL OF HEARING EXAMINER'S DECISION/RECOMMENDATION TO RENTON CITY COUNCIL. APPLICATION NAME: FILE NO. SA/CU-078wdOfOFRENTON RENTON VILLAGE ASSOCIATES1PR 1 2 19M RECEIVED CITY CLERKS OFFICE The undersigned interested party hereby files its Notice of Appeal from the Decision or Recommendation of the Land Use Hearing Examiner, dated March 5 19 91 1 . IDENTIFICATION OF PARTY *Request for Reconsideration denied March 29, 1991 . APPELLANT: REPRESENTATIVE (IF ANY) : Thomas A. Goeltz Name: Renton Village Associates Name: Davis Wright Tremaine Address: Evergreen Bldg. , #509 Address: 1501 Fourth Avenue 15 S. Grady Way Renton, Washin7+�n gRn55 Seattle, Washington 98101-1688 Telephone_ No. 206) 228-3000 Telephone No. 206) 622-3150 2. SPECIFICATION OF ERRORS (Attach additional sheets if necessary) (see attached) Set forth below are the specific errors or law or fact upon which this appeal is based: FINDINGS OF FACT: (Please designate number as denoted • in the Examiner's Report) No. Error: See. attached (regarding Finding 33, 34) Correction:: . CONCLUSIONS: No. Error: See attached (regarding Conclusions 2 , 3, 7, - 10-15, 23 . 27-30 . 35 , 37-39 Correction: OTHER: Conclusions No. Error: See; attached regarding Conclusions 2 and 5 (drainage/flooding) and 4 and 6 (height) and denial- of CUP Correct ion: Delete Examiner Conditions 2 , 4:;' 5, and- 6,- .and,,approve UP . CUP . . 3,.- SUMM:ARY.:OF ACT I O p t .:, I �1.:FiE;Q47ESTl,�?_ <.he C!i ay Council i.., r ...U;es tea.,:, �;. �� rf -t"' gr the fob"l'iiwiri' '.... ,.:.;f .. rehen (Attach explanation, i'f desired) :t x Reverse the Decision or Recommendation and grant the following relief: Approve CUP as recommended by staff. x Modify the Decision or ,Recommendation as follows: Delete Conditions 2, 4 , 5 and 6 Remand to the Examiner for further consideration as follows: Other: aolAdt Il41A4 k � 941 ' Appellant/Represent ive Signature Date 'NOTE: Please refer to Title IV, Chapter 30 of the Renton Municipal Code, and' Sections `4-30.16 and 4-3017, specifically (see reverse side of page) for specific appeal procedures . —.iul0: ArrrAL: unless tin uruiewriud pruvi une Tor review OT aecision OT Tne. -examiner requires review thereof by the S'.;•rior,Court, any interested party aggrieve. ". .;y Examiner's written decision or ,,ation may submit a notice of appeal ti a City Clerk upon a form furnished by _ ..1 City Clerk, within fourteen (14) calendar days from the date of the Examiner's written report. The notice of appeal shall be accompanied by a fee in accordance with the Fee Schedule of the City. (A) The written notice of appeal shall fully, clearly and thoroughly specify the substantial error(s) in fact or law which exist in the record of the proceedings from which the appellant seeks relief. (B) Within five(5)days of receipt of the notice of appeal,the City Clerk shall notify all parties of record of the receipt of the appeal. Other parties of record may submit letters in support of their positions within ten (10) days of the dates of mailing of the notification of the filing of the notice of appeal. I; .. (C) Thereupon the Clerk shall forward to the members of the City Council all of the pertinent documents, including the written decision or recommendation, findings and conclusions contained in the Examiner's report, the notice of appeal, and additional letters submitted by the parties. (D) No public hearing shall be held by the City Council. No new or additional evidence or testimony shall be accepted by.the City Council unless a showing is made by the party offering the evidence that the evidence could not reasonably have been available at the time of the hearing before the Examiner. If the Council determines that additional evidence is required, the Council may remand the matter to the Examiner for reconsideration. The cost of transcription of the hearing record shall be borne by the appellant. In the absence of an entry upon the record of an order by the City Council authorizing new or additional evidence or testimony, it shall be presumed that no new or additional evidence or testimony has been accepted by the City Council, and • that the record before the City Council is identical to the hearing record before the Hearing Examiner. (E) The consideration by the City Council shall be based solely upon the record, the Hearing Examiner's report, the notice of appeal and additional submissions by parties. • (F) If, upon appeal of a decision of the Hearing Examiner on an application submitted pursuant to Section 4-3010(A) and after examination of the record, the Council determines that a substantial error in fact or law exists in the record, it may remand the proceeding to Examiner for reconsideration, or modify, or reverse the decision of the Examiner accordingly. (G) If, upon appeal from a recommendation of the Hearing Examiner upon an application submitted pursuant to Section 4-3010(B) or (C), and after examination of the record, the Council determines that a substantial error in fact or law exists in the record, or that a recommendation of the Hearing Examiner should be disregarded or modified, the City Council may remand the proceeding to the Examiner for reconsideration, or enter its own decision upon the application pursuant to Section 4-3010(B) or (C). • (H) In any event, the decision of the City Council shall be in writing and shall specify any modified or amended findings and conclusions other than those set forth in the report of the Hearing Examiner. Each material finding shall be supported by substantial evidence in the record. The burden of proof shall rest with the appellant. (Ord. 3658, 9-13-1 ') 4-3017: COUNCIL ACTION: Any application requiring action by the Ci'y Council shall be evidenced by minute entry unless otherwise required) by law. When taking any such final action, the Council shall make and enter findings oaf • fact from the record and conclusions therefrom which support its action. Unles.:; otherwise specified, the CityCouncil shall r: n p e �" pr�ssi.a.ned to have adopted th.; Examiner's findinqs and coi clu3i:n2, (A) in the case of a change of the zone classification of property(rezone), the City Clerk shall place the ordinance on the Council's agenda for first reading. Final reading of the ordinance shall not occur until all conditions, restrictions or modifications which may have been required by the Council have been accomplished or provisions for compliance made to the satisfaction of the Legal Department. (B) All other applications requiring Council action shall be placed on the Council's agenda for consideration. (Ord. 3454, 7.28-80) . • (C) The action of the Council approving, modifying-or rejecting a decision of the . Examiner, shall,be final and conclusive, unless within thirty (30) calendar days - from the date of the action an aggrieved party or person obtains a writ of review from the Superior Court of Washington for King County, for purposes of review of the action taken. (Ord. 3725, 5-9-83) . SUMMARY OF APPEAL City staff and the ERC approved this project with conditions which are acceptable to the applicant. The Examiner concedes the project is well designed with "an attractive building . visual interest, attractive amenities and a focal point in its height . . . a significant upgrading of a retail center . and an economic magnet." (Report, Conclusion 1, page 7) However, the Examiner imposed substantial new conditions which effectively deny the project and which have potential city- wide impacts. The Examiner has declared in effect .a moratorium on development because of off-site storm runoff which flows onto and floods the site, even though the applicant in no way causes that preexisting off-site runoff, and this project will not add to (and in fact significantly reduces) current flooding. The Examiner also incorrectly reduced the office height by 38' based on preexisting traffic conditions even though the project meets all City traffic policies and adds only 4% to the peak hour. If the City Council wishes to consider moratoria on areawide development based on preexisting drainage or traffic conditions, it should hold a hearing for that purpose, and not have an ad hoc decision of the Examiner unfairly applied to this project. I. DRAINAGE/FLOODING. Renton Village Associates ("RVA") requests deletion of Examiner Conditions 2 and 5, which expressly preclude any further development until RVA "solves the current flooding problem" coming from off-site surface runoff, even though RVA has not caused any of that preexisting flooding, does not add any flooding, and in fact will substantially reduce preexisting flooding on adjacent sites. 1. Eighty to ninety percent of the surface runoff which causes the flooding within the Renton Village shopping area is generated off-site. It comes off Talbot Hill, across Talbot Road (FEMA, UW and City records) and from Metro's Park and Ride across Grady Way (See Attachment 8 - photos) . The applicant is being asked to solve an areawide, public problem, none of which is generated on RVA's proposed office site. Further, the applicant has no legal or practical ability to solve this public problem. 2 . RVA's drainage plan not only meets, but exceeds, Renton' s new surface water ordinance (108% of required storage capacity is provided) . 3 . Further, the project substantially reduces preexisting flooding on adjoining property by installing a 72" diameter drainage pipe to replace the existing 48" diameter pipe. 4. As allowed by Renton's new surface water code, the ground level of the parking garage was designed to retain a maximum of 6" of water (in fact, the Code would allow up to 12") . There is no risk of personal injury or a threat to public safety from a maximum of 6"" of water. This design, and the health/safety concerns, were specifically reviewed by the police and fire departments, the storm water utility division, the long range planning office and other city agencies. Not a single public health or safety comment was submitted regarding flooding. 5. Garage parking and site access will be flood free. The three garage entries are not subject to flooding, and are directly connected to access routes over areas which do not flood. 6. Flooding is manageable and of short duration. Typically, the site drains in 4-6 hours even after substantial GOELT\00855.OTR/4.12.91 Seattle storms. While inconvenient, flooding in this and other areas of Renton has been occurring for years. The four existing office buildings, hotel, retail center and cinema all have functioned in the past despite flooding with no threat to health or safety. This project will function even better since it has been expressly designed with additional compensating storage for surface water. 7. RVA will provide a hold harmless agreement consistent with the City's policy adopted in 1989 and applied to numerous other projects in Renton (See Attachment 7) . 8. Prior building on the Renton Village site fully met all drainage requirements (e.g. , Renton I, II and III and Cinema renovation) . There was no deferral of drainage requirements as suggested by the Examiner. 9 . Examiner's Condition 2 illegally "takes" private land for public flood storage. Since this project fully meets Renton's Code and provides 108% of the storage capacity required, the Examiner would deny this development to allow continued storage of the water coming from off-site. This amounts to a public taking of a floodway storage easement over private property. 10. The Examiner's Condition 2 constitutes a moratorium with neither Council approval nor any proposed solution or timetable. II. HEIGHT REDUCTION. RVA requests deletion of Examiner Conditions 4 and 6 (limiting the office height to 95' ) and approval of the Conditional Use Permit to allow the proposed building height of 133' . 1. To the extent the Examiner's height reduction was based on claimed traffic impacts, there is no basis in Renton code or SEPA for such a reduction. The project only contributes 4% to the peak hour traffic. Transpo specifically found that there will be no Level of Service change at any interchange, which satisfies the City's adopted traffic policies. 2 . RVA will meet all traffic-related ERC conditions. RVA must pay $436,758 for the Grady Way TBZ, plus improve intersections along Grady Way and Lake Avenue, improve signalization and undertake other specific traffic measures. Further, RVA must contribute to 2 other traffic feasibility studies. 3 . The Level of Service at each intersection is the same with or without the project 4 . Staff found the 10-stories is compatible with nearby buildings, including the four existing office buildings and hotel (See Attachments 6 and 7) . The building is only 24' higher than III Renton Place. 5. City Code and SEPA do not provide for height reduction to retain private views. The building height is consistent with the zoning and compatible in scale with surrounding buildings (See Attachments 6 and 7) . • GOELT\00855.OTR/4.12.91 2 Seattle BEFORE THE RENTON CITY COUNCIL In re Application of: ) Application No. SA/CU-078-90 RENTON VILLAGE ASSOCIATES ) APPEAL OF CONDITIONS Renton Village Associates ("RVA") respectfully requests the City Council modify the Examiner's Report and Decision dated March 5, 1991, by deleting Conditions 2 and 5 (drainage/flooding) and 4 and 6 (building height) of the Site Plan Approval, and by approving the Conditional Use Permit (re height) . This appeal is based upon the errors of law, fact and judgment set forth herein. I. DRAINAGE/FLOODING SITE PLAN CONDITIONS: Exam. Cond. No. 2. In order to protect the public health, safety and welfare, no additional development of this site shall occur until the current flooding problem is resolved. The applicant shall have to solve the flooding, whether it is by individual action or by concerted action that involves an LID or other method, prior to issuance of any building permit. Exam. Cond. No. 5. The lower level of the garage shall not be used for compensating flood storage as it will unduly jeopardize the public health, safety and welfare of the general public. BASIS FOR RECONSIDERATION 1. The Drainage Plan Not Only Meets, But Exceeds the Renton Code. The applicant's drainage plan exceeds the detention requirements of the City's new Surface and Storm Water Management Ordinance. That drainage plan has three major elements for detention and flood control: (a) subsurface drains below several APPEAL OF CONDITIONS - 1 GOELT\00776.PLD Seattle N I streets (underground FSC) ; (b) maximum 6" deep storage on part of the ground level of garage; and (c) installation of minimum 72" drainage pipe to replace existing 48" pipe. See ORB Org. Drawing. These three elements not only exceed Renton's code for this project, but also substantially relieve pre-existing flooding. The drainage plan expressly and fully meets the ERC drainage conditions. The Plan was approved as required by Randall Parsons of the City's Storm Water Utility Division, who stated: We have completed our review of the conceptual drainage plan submitted to us at a meeting last Tuesday, January 15, 1991 by The ORB Organization on behalf of the developer and have approved it with the following conditions [setting forth conditions which the applicant has or will meet] . (City Memorandum, Attachment 1, emphasis added. ) In fact, the first two elements (described above) of the drainage plan provide detention facilities which exceed Renton's new surface water management requirements. Specifically, the detention provided is 108% of the capacity required under the new code. See ORB Org. Drawing. 2. Applicant Improves Preexisting Flooding Conditions. The Examiner states in a number of findings and conclusions that the drainage plan "does nothing about the existing [flooding] situation" (Conclusion 14, p. 8) . See also findings regarding "no modification of current flooding, " the current level of flooding "would not be modified, " and the current APPEAL OF CONDITIONS - 2 GOELT\00776.PLD Seattle conditions "would not be alleviated and the inundation that has occurred in the past would be expected to continue." Findings 33, 34, p. 6. These findings and conclusions are in error and provide further support for eliminating the Examiner's Conditions 2 and 5. The applicant's proposed drainage system, in fact, will significantly improve pre-project drainage and reduce preexisting flooding on the site. Consequently, this project will not only take care of its own drainage requirements, but will also substantially reduce flooding which currently occurs on the site. This net improvement of drainage results from the third element of the applicant's drainage plan, i.e. , replacement of an existing 48" pipe with at least a 72" pipe. Currently, there is a 72" pipe which discharges into a 48" pipe just southeast of the Ernst store. During current heavy runoff and storms, this downsizing results in overflow and a flooding backup into the retail parking area. The replacement of the 48" with a minimum 72" facility will significantly improve existing flooding and drainage. Though flooding has occurred on nearby Grady Way (caused entirely by off-site runoff) , the final design of this project will significantly reduce or eliminate the 100-year flood plain problems both on site and for Grady Way. APPEAL OF CONDITIONS - 3 GOELT\00776.PLD Seattle 3. Garage Water Detention Presents No Health or Safety Risk. The entire parking garage is at-grade and will be built on pilings. The only reason compensating storage will occur is due to the intended design of the first level floor to "dish" the slab inward to hold a maximum of 6" of water, rather than a conventional slab design to cone and drain the water outward. Consequently, there is no risk of personal injury or a threat to public safety from a maximum of 6" of water, which has been specifically designed and approved by all appropriate city departments. Both the police and fire departments reviewed and approved the project plans, and those agencies are expressly charged with protecting and promoting the public health and safety. Likewise, the stormwater utility division, long-range planning office and every other reviewing agency in the City approved the project without any reference to flooding as creating a public health or safety hazard from a 6" deep detention facility. The record does not support the Examiner's conclusion that "the lower level of the public garage re-introduces the potential for injury." Conclusion 30, p. 10. First, the "lower level" is in fact the ground level and is no different than any other surface detention. Second, the applicant is unaware of any injury on the Renton Village site from flooding and no evidence was introduced in the record of such injury. As mentioned, both APPEAL OF CONDITIONS - 4 GOELT\00776.PLD Seattle the fire and police departments reviewed the project and made no mention whatever of health or safety concerns due to flooding. While inconvenient, the intentional flooding of up to 6" in the parking garage is no more, and probably less, of a factor than typical flooding in streets and parking lots that occurs throughout many parts of the City during flood conditions. Cars clearly can drive through 6" of water if required. The garage capacity allows all but 49 of the stalls required for the office building to park on above-grade levels (see memorandum Attachment 2) . Consequently, even if the ground level of the garage were functioning with its 6" deep retainage, no one is trapped or prevented from parking above the first ground level. 4. No Garage Access Location Will be Flooded. The significant elimination or reduction of existing flooding problems is an integral part of the scope of this project. The proposed garage has three ingress and egress points, none of which is subject to flooding. These access points directly connect to access routes which do not experience flooding, allowing access to and from the overall site via South Renton Village Place. As mentioned above, the project design will significantly handle pre-existing flooding on site and on Grady Way. Consequently, there is direct parking and access to and from the project, even during flood conditions, which will be safe and with no standing water. APPEAL OF CONDITIONS - 5 GOELT\00776.PLD Seattle 5. The Garage Compensating Storage Is Expressly Approved and Allowed by Code. The ground level storage was specifically approved by the City's Surface Water Division (see report from R. Parsons) . In fact, Renton's code would allow 12", rather than the 6" proposed for this project. See Attachment 3 from drainage manual. The Code also would allow the entire ground level to be used for storage, whereas the proposal is only to use two-thirds of the ground level. 6. Flooding Is Manageable and of Short Duration. The flooding which currently occurs on-site, and which will not be exacerbated (but in fact will be significantly reduced/eliminated) with the project, is not desireable, but has been and will continue to be manageable. It is typical of flood management which is required throughout other areas of the City. The Renton Village site itself drains within four to six hours, even during heavy flooding. The four existing office buildings, hotel, retail center and cinema, all have functioned in the past despite flooding with no threat to health or safety, although an inconvenience. There is no reason why the proposed project will not function at least as well, and in fact will function better, because of the design of the garage and access routes to streets which do not flood. As with the existing buildings, signage and traffic control can avoid flooded areas. This project has been APPEAL OF CONDITIONS - 6 GOELT\00776.PLD Seattle singled out, as has no other project in the City of Renton, to prohibit issuance of a building permit even though it exceeds the Renton drainage code by taking care of its own drainage while also substantially improving the preexisting situation. 7. The ERC's Hold Harmless Implements City Policy and Has Been Applied to Numerous Other Projects. The Examiner justifies his flooding Conditions 2 and 5 in part on the basis the required Hold Harmless Agreement from the applicant "is rare." (Reconsideration letter, March 29, 1981, page 2 . ) In fact, the hold harmless agreement is not rare and is a policy developed by the ERC and the City's Department of Public Works in 1989 and uniformly required in areas subject to flooding. The following are projects which have been required to provide similar hold harmless agreements: Blume Distribution (SA112-89) , Southgate Plaza (SA068-90) , Rivertech I and Rivertech II (SA129-89) , Alaska Distributors (SA120-09) , GSA/FAA (SA030-89) , East Valley Office Park (SA118-89) and Sheets Unlimited (SA039-90) . (See Attachment 7 - letter from City of Renton -4/9/91. ) Consequently, the hold harmless agreement does not make this a rare or even unusual project, and does not provide a justification for denial of development until off-site runoff flooding is eliminated. 8. The Overall Renton Village Site Has Fully Met All Conditions Imposed with Each Site Plan. The Examiner suggests previously-approved development on the Renton Village site had deferred the solution of runoff problems, APPEAL OF CONDITIONS - 7 GOELT\00776.PLD Seattle stating that "The history of the site in its permitting has demonstrated that while flooding has been a recurrent problem each new permit request has indicated that the flooding problem would eventually be addressed." (Examiner's 3/29/91 letter, page 1. ) First, RVA is a relatively new owner of the property, and was not the owner or developer of Renton Place I, II, III, the Evergreen Building or the hotel site. Its only prior project has been to renovate the cinema. Second, a review of the most recent site plan approvals for the Renton Village site shows the applicant met every drainage requirement imposed. RVA is unaware of any finding or conclusion that any prior site plan was not meeting code or other drainage conditions. RVA knows of no City approvals based on a promise of future drainage matters. For example, the cinema renovation approved in 1988 included an ERC requirement that "an acceptable drainage plan" be approved by the Department of Public Works. This was done. The Examiner's finding on the cinema renovation was the "the ERC conditions should mitigate storm drainage." (Dec. July 14 , 1988, p. 5. ) Likewise, the Renton Place III building, although not involving this applicant, included drainage requirements to help fund an area-wide storm water solution and also to install additional on-site drainage pipe. This was done. The Examiner's decision states the "applicant has agreed to participate in and make extensive drainage improvements." (SA 032-86. ) The Renton APPEAL OF CONDITIONS - 8 GOELT\00776.PLD Seattle Place III decision does not reference any deferred or future drainage improvements to be required of on the remaining undeveloped portions of the Renton Village site. 9. Illegally Appropriated Private Land for Public Flood Storage. The effect of the Examiner's Condition 2 is to illegally appropriate the applicant's private property for public flood detention purposes. This public flood storage is for preexisting flooding which is not in any way caused or exacerbated by this project. In fact, this project is neutral on flooding by clearly compensating for any flood storage displacement which occurs (i.e. , 108% of capacity as provided) . Further, by replacing the 48-inch line with a 72-inch line, it makes substantial improvements for preexisting flooding for which this application bears no legal responsibility. Condition 2's prohibition on development until the current (i.e. , non-project related) flooding is solved is an error at law and in equity. It constitutes a moratorium without any ordinance or other express City Council authorization. There is no rational nexus under the state and federal constitutions for imposing conditions or extracting public benefits (i.e. , public flood storage) , where the project does not contribute to any flooding. Condition 2 is without due process and without compensation and is therefore unconstitutional. See e.g. , Nollan APPEAL OF CONDITIONS - 9 GOELT\00776.PLD Seattle v. California Coastal Commission, 483 U.S. 825, -107 S.Ct. 3141, 97 L.Ed.2d 677 (1987) . The unconstitutional appropriation of the Renton Village site for public flood detention is based on the fact that approximately 80-90% (based upon studies conducted by the Federal Emergency Management Agency, the Washington State Department of Transportation, and the City of Renton; See Attachment 8) of the flooding that occurs on the Renton Village site is generated off- site. Thus, the pre-existing flooding in no way is attributable either to this project or the other buildings currently occupying the Renton Village Shopping Center. This off-site runoff comes off Talbot Hill, across Talbot Road from the Puget Sound Power & Light Facility, or from the Metro's Park and Ride across Grady Way. The Examiner's Condition 2 requiring the applicant to solve the flooding problem, either alone or through some other mechanism, is unreasonable and improper. As noted earlier, flood control is an integral part of the scope of this project, and the result will be no increase and a likely decrease in flooding. However, the source of the current flooding is off the applicant's site, and the complete solution is beyond the applicant's control. It is illegal to appropriate public detention without public payment. See e.g. , Nollan, supra; Just v. Marinette County, 56 Wis. 2d 7, 201 N.W.2d 761 (1972) (preventing owner from using floodplain property deemed an unconstitutional taking) ; Ackerman APPEAL OF CONDITIONS - 10 GOELT\00776.PLD Seattle v. Port of Seattle, 55 Wn.2d 400, 348 P.2d 664 (1960) (flight path over property deemed unconstitutional taking of an easement which required compensation) . The public taking here is different from claims of "overregulation or downzoning which have upheld municipal authority (see, e.g. , Presbytery of Seattle v. King County_, 114 Wn.2d 320 (1990) ) . This is a case of a physical invasion of floodwaters, with the effect of extracting a public flood storage easement from the private owner. Rather than a public solution to offsite flooding, the Examiner would impose on a single private property owner the unconstitutional choice of either curing a problem it didn't create and has no power to cure, or leaving the property undeveloped to receive drainage which is entirely off the proposed development site, and 80-90% of which is from beyond the Renton Village Shopping Center altogether. The cases of physical invasion are a per se violation of the constitutional taking and due process clause, and are different in character from the regulatory cases such as Presbytery, supra. Not only is the site being used to store the general public's flood waters, but the public is in fact in control of the outflow from the property. Public actions themselves are preventing drainage from the site. Specifically, flooding on the Renton Village site is directly controlled by public agencies' constriction of the outflow gate under Highway 405. APPEAL OF CONDITIONS - 11 GOELT\00776.PLD Seattle 10. The Examiner's Conditions Constitute an Improper Moratorium. Finally, the Examiner's Condition 2 amounts to a development moratorium until some publicly-funded or sponsored area-wide flood control measure is instituted. That constitutes a moratorium, which in order to be valid must be for a reasonable period of time with evidence that the public agency imposing the moratorium has taken reasonable steps to solve the condition. Here, none of those conditions are met. See Washington Market Ent. , Inc. v. City of Trenton, 68 N.J. 107, 343 A.2d 408 (1975) ; Capture Realty Corp. v. Board of Adjustment, 126 N.J. Super. 200, 313 A.2d 624 (1973) , aff'd. , 133 N.J. Super. 216, 336 A. 2d. 30 (1975) . II. HEIGHT REDUCTION CONDITIONS AND CUP DENIAL. Exam. Cond. No. 4. The building shall not exceed 95 feet in height. Exam. Cond. No. 6. The garage shall be reduced in size to provide a reduction in parking stalls in proportion to the reduction in office building size. CUP. The Conditional Use Permit is denied. A. TRAFFIC-BASIS FOR RECONSIDERATION. 1. The Project Contributes Only 4% to the Existing Traffic Flow. Both Staff and Transpo found that the Project contributes only 4% to the peak hour flow. The Examiner states that the building "generates potentially 15-20% more traffic to the area. " (Conclusion 2, p. 7. ) Factually, there is no support in the APPEAL OF CONDITIONS - 12 GOELT\00776.PLD Seattle record for any traffic in excess of 4% as found by professional staff and the traffic consultant. 2. All ERC Conditions Have Been Fully Met. The applicant is required to make specific roadway and access improvements, as well as contribute substantial funds, as part of complying with the ERC conditions. The City of Renton has not proposed, much less imposed a moratorium, either on the Grady Way corridor or more generally at some Level of Service threshold. However, the Examiner's conditions reducing height effectively have imposed a moratorium upon traffic at some unspecified level. Any curtailing of development to reduce traffic impacts should be done on an area-wide, ordinance basis by the City Council, and not through an individual permit decision that otherwise fully meets the City's code and the SEPA conditions imposed by the ERC. 3. The Applicant Has Met the Adopted SEPA Policies for Traffic. The State and City SEPA requirements specifically require that any mitigation, such as height reduction to reduce traffic, be based upon adopted, written policies in effect at the time of the decision which are specifically cited by the decisionmaker. WAC 197-11-660; RMC 4-6-22 . Here, the applicant is unaware of any SEPA policy which would authorize the reduction of building height for traffic mitigation, and the Examiner has not cited any in its decision. APPEAL OF CONDITIONS - 13 GOELT\00776.PLD Seattle The applicant prepared a complete traffic impact and mitigation study by The Transpo Group. That study was done to comply with the City's adopted SEPA and traffic policies. The study provides in part: City of Renton Standards The City of Renton policy for traffic mitigation is set forth in a memo that is distributed by the Traffic Division. For intersections, the policy states: "The developer is expected to maintain with their development. the same level of service that would be anticipated in the horizon year if the site were not developed. (Unless the horizon year level of service is at C or above) ." Transpo Report (excerpt of p. 17) , Attachment 4 . The Transpo study goes on to state at page 19: "Per the City's guidelines, no intersection-specific mitigation is required [for the proposed project] . However, the project will be preparing a TMP with the City of Renton." Further, the project makes a substantial financing contribution to the, Grady Way TBD to additional traffic analysis and makes site-specific physical improvements for transportation. The report further notes that: The nature of traffic generated by office projects lends them to successful transportation management plans (TMPs) . Currently, three office buildings in the Renton Village campus are occupied by Boeing, One Renton Place, Two Renton Place and Three Renton Place. Successful TMPs are operated at these offices which consistently result in the 15% ride share. Since Boeing will occupy APPEAL OF CONDITIONS - 14 GOELT\00776.PLD Seattle the Village Place North building, it is suggested that a similar TMP be developed for the office portion of the project. See Attachment 4. Such a TMP was imposed by the ERC and will be fully implemented by the applicant. Consequently, the City's adopted SEPA or other transportation policies have been fully met since the Level of Service at the various intersections will not be reduced as a result of this project. The project adds only 4% to the peak hour traffic, which cannot justify a three-story reduction in building height. 4. The Level of Service Is the Same With or Without the Project. The applicant's traffic study, as well as the City's analysis, confirm the Level of Service of the intersections affected by the project will have the same level of service with or without the project. Consequently, without a change in level of service, the reduction of the building height to achieve a reduction in traffic volume is in error and contrary to law. In its traffic analysis for the project, the Transpo Group summarized, "We have found that the Grady Way TBD study accounts for the planned build-out of the Village Place North site . . . . " Consequently, the applicant's contribution is consistent with and partially implements the City's establishment of the TBD. The City did not choose a partial moratorium or place any traffic capacity limits on Grady Way independent of the APPEAL OF CONDITIONS - 15 GOELT\00776.PLD Seattle TBD. Yet, the Examiner's height conditions do so by denying the CUP and reducing the building height to 95 feet. B. Comprehensive Plan/Compatible Surroundings. 1. The Renton Village Site Is Better than Downtown for Ten-Story Building. To the extent the building height reduction was based upon the CUP criteria regarding the Comprehensive Plan and compatibility with surrounding properties, this site, rather than downtown, is clearly preferred for a ten-story office building. There currently are no downtown buildings over three stories, except for the mid-rise height of City Hall. The existing streets in downtown are narrow and not expandable. Consequently, the traffic generated by the project would not be handled by existing roads, which in turn are much further from the major highway corridors of I-405 and SR 167. The staff found that the 10-story height is compatible with the nearby buildings, including the office buildings and the Holiday Inn. Staff further concluded "The proposed location provides sufficient separation from other structures on the site to allow air and light circulation on the site, to offer attractive view corridors and to ensure adequate privacy/defensible space." Staff Report, p. 8, ¶ C(3,) . Further, this site presents a clear separation of the commercial areas from residential areas with its road network, greenbelts and topographic changes. Finally, it is doubtful that APPEAL OF CONDITIONS - 16 GOELT\00776.PLD Seattle a ten-story building could be approved downtown due to the proximity to the airport and required FAA approval (which in fact was necessary and obtained for this site) . 2. A Ten-Story Building Is Compatible With Existing Development. Unlike downtown, the Renton Village site currently has a strong office building character. Although somewhat higher than the existing office buildings on the Renton Village site, this variation clearly is in scale and supported by existing building height as well as power poles (see Attachment 5 showing sea level elevations; with the various site gradations the proposed building is actually only 24 feet higher than Three Renton Place) . C. View Blockage. 1. View Blockage Is Not a Legal Basis for Height Reduction. As recognized by the Examiner, the City Code and SEPA policies simply do not address view blockage, nor do any adopted SEPA policies. The Examiner has correctly concluded that "as long as the problems of glare and reflection are adequately addressed, the question of view cannot otherwise be weighed in this analysis. " As required by Condition 9, which is fully acceptable to the applicant, light and glare will be addressed. The applicant acknowledges the building will impact views of some residences that are located approximately 1,200 feet from the project. APPEAL OF CONDITIONS - 17 GOELT\00776.PLD Seattle However, though the Examiner recognized some views would be blocked, he noted that "these impacts are to be expected. " (Conclusion 26, p. 10) . The building is clearly compatible and in scale with the surrounding buildings, which include four office buildings with a height of approximately 107 feet (to the top of the elevator penthouse) . See Attachment 6. 2. The Parking Garage Is Six Levels, Not Stories. To the extent the Examiner was concerned about the height of the garage and any view blockage, it is important to clarify that the garage is five "levels, " not five "stories." While generally referring to the garage as six "levels, " the Examiner specifically equated the six-story existing office buildings with a six "story" parking structure. Paragraph 37, p. 11. The parking garage is 54 feet, which would equate to four "stories" as normally used for an office building. CONCLUSION Based upon the foregoing, the applicant requests the City Council delete Examiner Conditions 2 , 4, 5 and 6 and approve the Conditional Use Permit for a 10-story office building and eliminate Conditions 2 , 4, 5 and 6 from the Site Plan approval. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, this 12th day of April, 1991. DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE Attorneys for Renton Village Associates /, By u Thomas A. Goelt WSBA #05157 APPEAL OF CONDITIONS - 18 GOELT\00776.PLD Seattle ..I 4 LIST OF ATTACHMENTS 1. Memorandum from Randall Parsons approving the conceptual drainage plan. 2 . Parking calculations from August 8, 1990. 3 . Excerpt from the King County Surface Water Design Manual. 4. Excerpt from the Traffic Impact Analysis. 5. Diagram showing elevations measured from mean sea level. 6. Photographic reproduction of area with proposed buildings superimposed. 7. Letter to Loren Laskow from Lenora Blauman, dated April 9, 1991. 8. April 11, 1991 memo regarding flood pictures. HILLR\00129.0TR/4.12.91 Seattle CITY OF RENTON MEMORANDUM DATE: January 22, 1991 TO: Don Erickson • FROM: Randall Parson SUBJECT: VILLAGE PLACE N RTH - CONCEPTUAL DRAINAGE PLAN • We have completed our review of the conceptual drainage plan (enclosure) submitted to us at a meeting last Tuesday, January, 15, 1991 by The ORB Organization on behalf of the developer and have approved it with the following qualifications: (1) The methods proposed for providing compensating storage for the fill to be placed within the 100 year floodplain are reasonable but will need substantial additional refinement at the construction plan stage with respect to design details. These details should include, but not be limited to, addressing the following criteria: Underground Compensating Storage Retention Fields: These should.be designed to assure adequate conveyance of the flood waters into and out of the field. Measures should be incorporated to protect the fields from oils and clogging from silt and sediment both during construction and on a permanent basis. Access points for monitoring the health of the fields should be provided. A filter fabric envelope to prevent migration of fines into the fields should be included. A safety factor of 50% should be incorporated in the sizing of the volume of storage to allow for deficiencies in analysis, design, construction, operation, and maintenance. The fields should be "chambered" to control the degree of potential clogging throughout the fields. Garage Basement Ponding: Parking on this level should be extra and not used to meet the building's minimum number of required parking spaces. Flood waters should be allowed to pond up to no greater than one foot in depth and an overflow system provided that will prevent overtopping of adjacent roadways or flooding of adjacent structures. There should be a separate system to collect runoff from washing of the floor and direct it into the sanitary system with a passive means to prevent such flow when the floor is subject to flood waters. Signs should be provided to warn building users that the floor may be subject to flooding during heavy rains. A gate system should be considered at the entrance to this floor that would be automatically triggered to close when flood waters are present. It should be noted that these concepts, while innovative and acceptable in concept to the Storm Water Utility, are non-standard and may not meet the requirements of other City codes or departments. - (2) The proposed extension of the 72 inch line to the southwest portion of the site will require a hydrologic analysis to address impacts downstream. This pipe could Don Erickson Village Place North Page 2 possibly reduce the floodplain on the site and eliminate the need for all or a portion of the compensatory storage proposed and warrant's analysis. At a minimum, this pipe could be partially extended as a new conveyance system hydraulically connected to the compensatory storage areas to provide controlled inundation and recession of flood waters rather than the uncontrolled waves of surface flows that will currently pass across the parking areas. (3) Biofiltration facilities are required for all new impervious surfaces in excess of 5,000 square feet that will be subject to vehicular use or storage of chemicals sl per er Core Requirement #3. This would include areas that are currently g ravcompacted earth and that are proposed to be paved. It appears that there may not be any areas that will require these facilities. • (4) Any off-site work in the downstream wetland areas such as improvements for water quantity or quality control should be considered as a separate project with, therefore, a separate SEPA process. We assume you will coordinate the applicant's receipt of this information. If you have any questions regarding these qualifications, please call me at extension 5548. 91-060:RLP:ps CC: Lenora Blauman Gregg Zimmerman Ron Straka Enclosure 03/15/94 " 10:09 206 235 8007 beU inwi ' ltUhjflI ..+..trr # AT..."`:\.,.:,• , ..43.4"..: i) - i; ' a ----1 J r, .,.. . ...._._ • .. 1 i ,,. ii, _ . irg.. . i.,; , flu 4‘... ii t. . ..% .4....-......1 ,...... .1.1 ...0 ii, i ,..... , i: / 1 . ... . I lk . . : i ,P! : . , . . I( I •*.: •.IF—1 • a : 1 , N.vc i - : •F_?' -"•'Jl:r' • "^S "f.:, "h' fit; ' trylz .. . •.. .. !sr ., i •: �!� """tea`•- ��\�•. { 1 . , :k 0 / ''''- - .- •-• -- .1.:1•••-'';:% •-.411"- :'1,‘ 1(1.''II' "II i .71, ' r i .'.. '' '.- -' ' '.".. .•' . " /• ' ' ..'" •••• '1 li'li.'''.'•':2:•':. :-... .,•-:'.46-• . ' ''''' . • '''',...••' V"-'Let,..-.....,,..._' ".'''. '-‘ . ....••....•.,.' -.' ,"4 • /' I \ . � •`'°=„'..:.. ,' •tZT . 000 III: I ► .. 1 • . i / 1/ • fit. ' :;,r • • •• , 'I _ ,, i ,":;',.. l'.1 risill ?:,;:,YLI".4412„...,-.:„..„ , ey.4.1.!4.c.RDs•.•••:„ •:.• .. •:,::', -..::-,,•:,,--•':?-_:7-,-.:":,.. --,..,' ' -:'::,.i '...'-'• -: -':.;:,:-:::__—___.'• - .7— • '2499 ' (I .........---- ,Agyza3r, .;., ,...,,,,, ,: , ,.-,, 3maiiiir ... .. • , ---1 - •. p..4 1 , .-,-, 11‘ 11 ..•..I_reMra M.iY1....• - _ 1 h. , ..,,, .. • . , . . _ , r., , . ) . i . ; TIZIV ,..-:-_-_____ „..L.., ...._ _o,,, , ., , -... .: .,.-- •"•:'I. •.,..- ,-;:••::.,-... 1- '. li . ; ' ' I 111111°N . , . ,, . I t? /‘ . • "' "' C' .:, A,,.„:•.,...,. . ...............,„ .z.,„ ii,1 , •i, ...;„.i,...,,.. • • •i -',.-,-..._......-. 1 ,.• .7 1...• ;, :J . . - / ra,-.. .. ..: _ • . i :roe . .: , - iiiiii -:,:. • N-I1 t1. -�� � w�nn f . . �1 I. / i .....-.... i , 1 ;• iliWIIIIIMPS:' -:••••...--t- t - r. ) t:. .* r �. •_ • . • F ) 1 .. , I i ) s e- . 777 742::.,,,-:F., c.-, 7111S4-.. f --. •:(,.. :I".,.,.,• ly• rr P . • Et - .: , ... I * d i - f,,;: :rP` f • 3 Mar tat fir" '1 ,,;u . ';- •Zy� '�'i + . _ - a.twsimrM.wrl� 4 i� +�� ! :. 6 V-.. -, " i • ala+ia i. ft 1 I If-. : • ,. i' 1 a...— 7 t ! . n v- rl i j;' r - .f :rr 9 _ -. I I I I li t* ..-1 f/i , _ . I �,1• /I�S701111iE tS. ; 7i_ ,.,. .„, • _- • a1ill�A,q a * �rsry M�r>fri•n�0•rarr•�Nafe tr�r+ 7 `. '`Orr•a*�y.:�y•��•...r.::•! :1 yaa•o= •• t r••f_ ` - aa�v __l _ . iMtR�!•. -'.�'. Y f i-i 'r' imps* •bww•-- 'a er tAC Wogs* - 1 ,I;• .; fi °"..;' - "•i,-'-' _ �''o. ��- �� �:".. ', . • a ,.. .03/15Y91 08:52 •-• l & SEATTLE fj002 August 8,1990 Callison ; Village Place North �r�hure Area and Parking Calculations , Programming • ' Manning Interior Design G r ap hiu 1. AREA OF BUILDING aldng.Gross _Oft. Gross Net Office* Cora Ret. Gross Eft. Floor 10 28,171 28,171 25338 2,832 89.9% Floors 2-9 (8)30,219 (8)3Q219 (8i 21,387 (8)28832 90.6% • Floor 1 35,360 2214 • 15.928 42286 15,144 78.5% Total 305,283 290,131 29.774 15,144 89.7% 2. PARKING A. Office • 1302 cars Scars 260,363 net sr = 1000 net sf" (or gross leasable) REQUIRED: PROVIDED:1302 cars 1302 cars (1i � �q 521 compacts(max.) 359 compacts B. Retail 15,144 new building 11,100 new infill 4,100 Schumsky's • 1,804 vacant 15,000 Tradewell 20,000 Pay N Save 27,000 Ernst lr.o- • .401.-.. , +.a....,u ti.r1684grRss.x 9..a: 34 751 nest,- . .. _• . 466 cars 55 cars _ 84,751 net se = 1000 net se REQUIRED: PROVIDED: 466 cars 466 cars • 140 compacts(max.) 125 compacts • • "net sf=-Gross Leasable.' 1420 Fifth Avenue Suite 2400 Seattle,Washington 98101 (206)622-4646 FAX:(206)623-4625 03-/18."d1 13=b'! .tom -- . IN • 03 KINO COUNTY, WASHINGTON, fiURrActs WATER Da$IQt1 MANUAL Detention-rsvtilties �....� Thare are two main types of detention factrkrss: ponds;and, tanks or vaults. The method,of analysis and design standards for detention faoftties can be found in Section 4.4 in Crtapter 4. radar of Qaf : The design volume of detention facilities used to meet the standard peak ruts runoff oohtroi performanwe calve for the 2-and to-year, 24-hour dUratiOn design storm events shell be Increased by a 30 percent factor of safety. This requirement shall be met by leeriest proportionally by 30 percent the design detention volume bttween each 1 loot of storage depth Withoutnoreuing the total depth of etoriage or altering the design control orffirtt/wsir sizing. petentionpo�e: Detention ponds are me.most desirable alternative for detention fealties far water Quality bandtlui. relative ease of inspection and soma for.malntenanoo. King County encourages the design of multi-purpose detention ponds which can eerie the multiple r se of recreation (such as playgrounds or picnic areas), wildlife habitat (wetlands areas) and as oe (landscaping to provide for a natural appearance). Multi-purpose ponds must meat ail the requirements of the purposes they are required to perform. In multi-purpose ponds Incorporating recreational factitive,the recreational feovklN must be designed in a manner oompatlbte with.the storm water functions and maintehanoe standards. Detention ponds may combine the performance requirements of wetponds(see Opeolsl Requirement #e and 6eotion 4.0.2 in Chapter 4). Defentten Tanks-and Vsulta; Detention tanks end vaults are underground facilities for the storage of surface water. Tanks aro typically constructed from corrugated pips and vaults are constructed from reinforced concrete. Tanks and vaults provide less water quality benefit (bloliltratlon and biologic activity)than ponds,therefore, bloflhration measures are especially important. Arkin° Lot Pow: Private parking lots may be used to provide addttlonel peak rate runoff cons detention volume for the post-developed peak rates of runoff for design Storms greater than the • 10-year,24-hour duration design storm provided that: (1) the depth of water detained can not exceed 1.o feet at any location In the parking lot; and (2) the minimum gradient of the parking lot area subject to pooling shall be I percent;and (3) the emergency overflow path meets the same requirements as for Infiltration systems. Roof P- : Ponding of roofs of structures will be allowed to be used for peak rate runoff control detention volume provided that: (1) the depth of water pondsd can not exceed 1.0 feet at any looatton on the roof; and (2) the minimum pitch of the roof area subject to ponding shall be 1/4 Inch to 1 foot; and (3) the roof support structure la analyzed by a structural engineer to adores.the weight of the ponded water; and (4) the roof area outgoot to ponding Is wster•proofed wttn a method with a minimum *vomited service life of 30 years. Retention Faollltles There are two basic types of retention ftwliltles: ponds and closed depressions. Retention ponds are constructed by a combination of excavation and/or berming. dosed depressions may be established as retention faculties, and in tome cases enlarged to acoommodate additionl Surface and etormwatsr runoff by excavation and/or berming. 1.2.3-3 1/40 1/ PROJECT IMPACTS AND MITIGATING MEASURES City of Renton Standards The City of Renton policy for traffic mitigation is set forth in a memo that is dis- tributed by the traffic division. For intersections.the policy states: 'The developer is expected to maintain with their development the same level of ser- vice that would be anticipated in the horizon year if the site were not developed. (Unless the horizon year level of service is at C or above.)" The Village Place North project does not meet the city's threshold requirements for intersection mitigation;however.the project proponent will be providing three significant mitigating measures to reduce the effects of project generated traffic on the street system. The first is a transportation management plan(lMP),the second is a contribution to area- wide improvements in the S Grady Way transportation benefit district(TBD). and the third includes improvements to the S Grady Way/Lake Avenue S intersection. Transportation Management Plan. The nature of traffic generated by office projects lends them to successful transportation management plans(TMPs). Currently.three office buildings on the Renton Village campus are occupied by Boeing, One Renton Place.Two Renton Place, and Three Renton Place. Successful TMPs are operated at these offices which consistently result in a 15 percent rideshare. Since Boeing will occupy the Village Place North building.It is suggested that a similar TMP be developed for the office portion of the project. S Grady Way Transportation Benefit District The City of Renton has implemented a plan to collect pro-rata contributions from new developments to fund areawide improvements in the S Grady Way TBD. The contribu- tions are based on the type of development and the number of daily trips it is estimated 89463.01 The TRANSPO Group,Inc. • Page 17 ..... , ' ..- • . . ' • . . . . 10 14% . • . . . . . , . . . . • . . . . .11.iREE RENTON TWO RENTON ONE RENTON ___ .YR,L.A.GE PLACE.Kniti, IBM. ._ "WINS fiA.iiiiig. ' EVERGREEN 131iWM_ . - . , , • -,, • . - !Mr lEYCOID .:,• .-- ' ; . s.._i . — • ... " .. , . .. . t• . .. •..,..::..12. ' 157 ' • '''-' ; . ;4•H''..- - .. . • s.:-.' ..... . ., ' r g f• ' -'. . ..,--,-..,..•.-—'re . fli - - .‘" F::7--ZAIM ' . V • ,*;-1: 'ism" . : '';'`c'.. 'f'.iii 4:,.k', -i-40 •••••.:.1-405'- . . ' . • •MOM Wane PROM WM MA MM. .., • .. . .emir • . -• . • . . • . _. - • . . . • . . VELLACE_•.:_ELACELNORTN._______,. . • 11 MANS\• i. cr(07., • • - • likkriliffIK sli•tsoit.04 . . usg5r,..1 54,al-o 78-96 . . 5e.04.. Le. . ale....*.As . • / . , • . . - - . • . . 1 . 1 - . . . . . . . . . - . . . . , 4 • . • , 7.„,_m' 'g' �/ iLSZ /6•�/ 1 14 • 1)tt fk-i - •.. ( �" _ _ • t 4.�^ } e�'vlrc '' '.+i. ..- ?Y 10,4::,34,,,ar 'i..,,€ ' .- _ .GF 2 •p�4� • ✓ ,i•, y'•,,._.:.,, , 1 "�.- I ' I I - 1 n ' ., rl � �, 1_ t r-^--`_�_ .— �— �r jai , i • • , `'2 � �y hn- �.y.-. '• � �� � • � • � 3 +�� 1 .+.t'y Sit i t s ,-,• -1 .� • -r " c ' ♦� ! i C • ,cam„ �„I f 1, ....- "lrs ''�`-�1 F..� _:�•Fr,.,t _.. —�. .' �y Y�-c„ 'z,-y � �rw�.a.caas,r! : •--7r .. i' s , �"z� " f ,' _ - r 1 . i . f • • • • • • _• 1' -�g� .�+:�.,«.�:•..,'e� .. `f �7i�'�:fl'7 . > ♦ � yz� • •• i•+ �� ,� _ . — $3'i • �� +'�.r %!' roL2t� Sit 1 � 3t':1i,Sydr-11.A ♦.:y �+:I:, a.• 4-1. r� a„r ,�� kS'+3Yt+w3+53b .w`� ,- • '-.i::'. �sra- ,f� \i Alt- ^� ♦ _ sr, { 4"a, §,,,, .,mz �h ti • • >a i ~ .--f liE «. 1 +fi _ M a. c , ...:trr.J .,+�•�'�_� M _ ,h ,1. ,� a •._ ti,e -rW' �l, + .t.:, i i:_.'.r h r • : • .,r...- r-._... �, .c f i jII. ~ 1 1: 1 1 1 "I• F G1 �id ,f 5t e�•.�c� r c -�-�,..� A- "�:`. �.a^�,.u�r c x,,. � <r�`i:h�Ff r'� L�j •t s a c♦4;� • ':�t';1� �it�.:�..7i,,n+.�•�'�'•..<• ,i'e , I .:.� .,,5 .._.- -..`-uarrx k..��� k iA4 ,.� ...� _ ..,ijQ. : n. y i.� '�tr ,�.. :f. a Y 42 w r- � } Z:. q1,�oA :2lc t.� '-./-tb:y.cxiL`i4n2f�"'�' '�f/rr y • . ..f r r ram,,,., -r Tt.:i,.rs.atitft� t2 •vim',; _ • • _ 1 a ...1:\s1,aaa t '. o }� to { [i.I y..•.. 7.a a: •'a;r.:,3rz'�x'ca=.a<- •2'i t a 'tyf. ` tw"G d'iL^a.�«':,i!. ,i:O��.�it,i ! ♦-, ', i \ti��V ` ^t.'�. - } +...— 1, r:mtt•�xesn ..--f-' '6,. zL 'ki: i` {�':�z• Ti?I �/�d � .I ,1, -- —`: - - ,!t'tP, �� .\ t �a,' -$�.+s., '�`` :.:.v4i�r.{- .,�. r ,awe�� ,4' .,�` 1 c'., ,�i .:�r vim•= ;,� r i )[1 ` 'I t+ "`c ,, v �/ -i 1 -f 0 VN f- • iV :: fl S } .rti 1� :fir'. i. !•'rY%..•„>.'..ve.::-:�1,'i 4�`�;ra?,� ��. t 1 _ - 4 �'t . :.:::. ,,,. .: . any: / ft-,:t,•!'ii2]."4-:7•F'..:.•."•••."...:...•••.'..:'''.;.••:•'!,.;_''.. tit'.'". -l' , - t'• 4{ y -?`,-:!. ,..%=^'r�`•>1.•I.r .�/. - • .;::'.sue... 4Y • • 4% CIT' OF RENTON 66"._ ? Planning/Building/Public Works Department Earl Clymer, Mayor Lynn Guttman,Administrator p1 . . April 9, 1991 Loren Laskow Renton Village Management Corporation Evergreen Building, Suite#509 15 South Grady Way Renton,Washington 98055 RE: Village Place North (SA 078-90) Dear Mr. Laskow: This letter is written in response to your request for information concerning the"hold harmless"agreement that you are required to provide to address damage to life and/or property which could occur from flooding on the above-referenced project site. Under a policy developed by the Public Works Department and the Environmental Review Committee in 1989,the City requires such an agreement(to be implemented prior to issuance of site preparation/building permits)for each development located in the City's identified flood plain as a precaution against potential flooding damage.:.Examples of projects required to provide such agreements would include Blume Distribution (SA 112-89), Southgate Plaza(SA 068-90), Rivertech I and Rivertech II (129-89),Alaska Distributors(128-89), GSA/FAA(SA 030-89), East Valley Office Park(SA 118-89), and Sheets Unlimited (SA 039-90). This agreement is necessary so that the City may authorize development in areas where there is a potential for flooding to occur. The document is required as a supplement to the installation of water management systems(such as compensatory storage) because of the dynamic nature of the flood plain. If you would like to have further information, please contact me at 235-2550. Sincerely, f01- 4%J Lenora Blauman Project Manager 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 gke RE: Flood Pictures The enclosed pictures were taken in January of 1990 by a Boeing helicopter. The pictures are numbered on the back. #1 Three Renton Place in the foreground, Two Renton Place in the background. Flooding is visible on the Puget Power property, which is flooding Talbot Road and the parking lot between the two buildings. The water is flowing left to right. #2 The Shopping Center is, in the center, One Renton Place and the theater in the background. The water again flows left to right around the shopping center flooding the lot and Grady Way. #3 The Ernst store is in the center of this photo, One Renton Place on the left and the Pay 'n Save store lower right. corner. The Cinema is in the background, the manhole by E:_rust, where the 72-inch line goes into a 48 inch can be seen blowing water out - but is basically flooding only the surrounding area. The roading near the theater is flooded by a drain backing up from the 43 inch line. #4 Another picture of parking lot at Two Renton Place." #5 & 6 Another picture of parking lot. C-_) • . 1 .,_-.A. aim Irma"a tor VV. • - , . . • • • - ,...` la f"fiCiWir "..4 ,.,••,. • ..,. ..r„/Lk4r.o•-•// -At....1--,..1. 1' -.-- ' • \ '\ . - ,;:m•-, ( ,rr..--_-- 7 ' A, •• , . • a NIL,- • tiNalii.fe :ft"a il.. 1.1.11.1....1111......1 . ''. 1 .. -:Wiwi • ita'44. ". i',:-.... L.„.., , MEINNIMMI11111.111.11 s.- iliVatie -argil, , 4I.J\W .Nz,a.• .; ,L •1 LK-4021 -kimp,,0 . a - '..,.. •Emmm... ----- .M..1.1...........1.1.1.1.11111111111.1_____. Slew iri.ewt. - ___.....m__ ....m............••___ •••=_. - _4'..,-4 4' ,1., N- 1, 7 ,,t,"f,4"If:" •I irool argstLd'IV - ---mm;..........••••••••••IMBMMMMMMM---. 1rx-zl OW. ft.., • ,..tririW‘vii;ip .i. It;fitt,,6'.'s.'.7' v....-,NraNka at,/./,,,, ISIe•- ' f'.9...q. •M°111 . I. ,/ • f el‘"`i'• :•.-"',....)1'.• 'PilaZil - ,w ., ' 2 ,ti., ;1"-:•,'-o•, ,; .'44.1 , '• ..:-•,°. k„,,„ , .• W.7•74,411 . ''''' •11-;ti•21.L-V, •kt':4;4'i -0,.... .00. ..`.4.' ,...• '..1, ' • ,,./ •••'Z'•,-,.. Mill.1111.11 ...••• ...... .',..;rip ,-... ....,...., — Wilip'-.• . .,c14":•% ... 'opte,6• '',,,;.-'Vie • ,,...11•07.,..,:7--,,,14...fite_ .,,,,,,-, ... .5.-.. ,A ,.,„ •..,•,,..e ..• - , j, ....4 i_vialitrftio . f • '.-N• 44.:4-:-. f . ' -- i --1 ar- • • ....0-,...-----_- - - _,• .- • '''''',44., , ,..,,__,!, grzi...jv.., L, :,,_. ' Iiiisfilr • '''-4 ar/W---,...."*.---,- ,t.),, 4-, ..r- -ensma . :.• •••• • '--,,,' ••ti.4.:^7. : ; •j 1.,4,•..ti,.' rfi-?4 . ‘ . - : _ mu c,___1,7 -!--,-,,,,,,,..- A....-',_.7 ',„:3,":„.„5„,45/;‘-•,14;',,,--7 .., ; :•-••••• - ' q -.- ,----•,-------. . . ,......... .r. ‘,- .. P.,:t -%PP 110.•'!:,•-‘'''' •_..,', . •,.11 •WHT1 / , I ii, 4, ;it • • 1,,,, 11 `7' - ' „ - •,.•..4-, ..., 1.-_....1-‘,... „;.,,...-,,,,,..-:•-••• ,-,••• ••••••,• , , , . a *.144#4. , , , •• "'s 7- - '------ - k 0.010e`a -7-,----- .z.;-.•‘....s4- ---g; •,::''-.- - . 1 67 MIT L.J--, -------,3,--- -.---- --.- • -----'4,-e--- - - - .1 , - - , , t 1:"1 • - ... "r... * '' - .-"-- • • ,,,- ----• , •30,..." iiikAt Virrar• .......• . _.• • - - .. ' ' ' -'•''''• - .41...... 71 ''.- t 1:::'p,,,1",..‘',.' ,,,.--"(•,'• '•-•, ., , --. I .' • L:L.,. . '" : ';',,--.,”' ' , l''........•'...1.t'''t';;..''17:4::'I.:**.'""*:''''F:',,,',., •".•,..';'7•-;--•, ,,,,,.!.•,',,'3i. ,,:..1,7 -i•-,t,..,,,.-.. . -.. •• •••tt...)e,'(4.,...t%•14 -'.*;' *-4-";',--...J2 L' ., / 7 -: -.4". l ikataW• . , ................ ......, .. 1 - • - ...j. t:::,.•_ ,). Wit OA ----'."....ml___ .4:7 - .'. .-• -.-"'" ,.. -1 .----. ,. .1.4''%. ' '-al2" ...-;‘' --- nom i.u I a au 0 im••••"" _...A•.r . ....__,. -• If"s4, ---;iiii. aii ,-......_ •1/441„-- 1,, - .. -.iii? -. . -..v., ... •-•-,-.- 11.. ...._.-- .. '''........---1- . ... - -_ --.- , ... --.....,it • pof,ir2 ..._. • - ,, -,- v . ., 11 k. • it, N'Yes:\atanarZ)M- 1,11-11t -.....E.E••=unmmm.mmul.....I, ., .: roilisory.....,....4„1,,,,,,f.x.i.k•••,„.. .:4„.,.." 1 ....,,,,-0-.•„ii 0 sir:70.',•••-L4'.---,' 1 4/ '' ---•'r}:,;:,*••:.t. • 4, -.0 ---'•'•• •••=if-----.- - - : -;-------1-.... '',-"4-:,II.,;,',' :f4-itti-,. --,;-.--,...75,';.: —40,.,.9,-- , , _-* _________. , _...„_..:,_7.,.1_,,,,....,____.w.4.„04:04,, , :7:::_. ,ti .....1,.;..„. -,.•-.._,:-.. . •.,155_A.___.1,....,__,... _,. _.,...„, .,•,-,..,”• i .....„,,,___ _--- . 0.,,, ,„ ..-zeA-21.• - -. *AB i,......- IN - ••• .- '-. -- r....'" 44 1.-7-4- .. .‘i.,,,_ • ' '- ._ , - . -. '- ---- 1 _- -t___. .;-:-..e----- i:-• ,,‘„,11;."---•-•••*•,,.•r.,,,:,....,--,, - __----- ,-, "4'. • .,- .. '''`..-- .. - -......--,---...,-_-_-..........=-,.. •'.4.'.0. ,, , . q' '------. --!--- -4-..---',-,----•--- '--- ---.,•-• , • ••-. ''';'-g" .$''''''...;:0-",4,4'il''''-4. • 4'. .,*‘•‘.; ,... • ..) -• . • -*Wt.4...,. 7•11'.,A: ' *'.. . = .• , ._,..k.c., ,....t...:5--J .• . _ - ! ,.., •i'••=7:- ... . ,...,...,-. •.., , ft- 4.ky, t j.,,,- „, ,•.- - --,.,..-Z-. .- 4'-' \l',--:-2‘4,;-'-' • 'A. ' -A.....' •••..L'.7-, sz ,,,,,,,A••,,,i4-.... •'-:-1.4---, . it . , ,.‘„ ,... ,. -/ -- , S:4::•••,:,-;, . - -NA.;.1-,.1...... • -- ,.,-. .. -.; .....- 4.'" tv-iS--f", ' - - -10" - *' .'t'.4 ",. .I •/./.. : . •••• :1,'; iiitr4 . , . ' •-•:.\' _ •;•',sai -- • ' .3.,.., - •„.i, •• •-,,,. . "'PI, ' „...- ' ': ' -4'ri. ,..-."'.---%,(...z.i.1.7.-"..ie.'n":1;„_,:ia$ - ' - ,----,-- ,, - . I ‘7,-,--:•.Z.ti..3,-.1., -. ,,\ •...t.7.1.3 7"-'•.`"\, ;.'4,'--:• .4. 0 1:,,,47, ,,,'-,...-„,- ramve,',g,"k I. .. ., .,...,....,,,.•, ....:IT-:: - ' „-_ 4,,..., •..,,, , ..N.,... , • L.' )„.' --.1 *:‘ r• . ,... . , -t. .- .„, ,4, • ' 0,;7.: , ,' .. ,-.. • ,,, , = :it...,.;....i*.k PI - ''''' '. !,..r.'= 4: ' .'-•••.'-'... - •.., ,,'„,,.'"','..,r1, -,,, ',,,' ti- •,, •,- ,kinuibe; , .. ••••MX-,41111151\- ,•••t i I i"'L.:- k. 1;tOR , • '..•''." • ',:- .. . kit,^k '',-,''''''.ti-1''''',*-",, ''''0. r'''''," 4* *•;,,.6' 7-;""'"-'45'4-* ' " -,..''r ..L:.-.4.',...•:6 t --"L'. -:'i.‘•• ''•••" ./tt.' --.1:1t: IL '•:..';,;•&-,-• ---t-t'',.,--sg 1'. 'm,,-%Lt....* - •,•.$',.'.,•;-,f,t,•.,"' , 41-il`I'ra,.•'%,"'",""?Le, ,_Ltt„CgP.7.; ..,,,g, r-?'..4?:;-;:-.'•,.. ''s.1-‘..--''''. 4' li '''-'-'z'7-'1" ''"!‘-,, . •-,i4..ZA..,'•";;:e..)• ,k.: . ‘''.:::1.3i::$,.'4;'4.;,-1, --Lei‘-'4.4*.0s,, .".:70-:W,I&L3'Z's. *. L' '''....i0s ''' ..'''''' ''r:--; prejliW C''•; arr."--ttili'' ' -IA '....*". '' ,j!.''' '','...:`-r'i. •:,,,Ir.;'i'-'''iliK, :2 ,-,•«4-'' :; -fr-1,,,Pli----#4 , .t.,•,. '. ‘.4 e.";:..0'/' '.81.',:„1;4401.''''e '7.''., ,,'...'4.P.41%.1 1 .51. yi''...... ' &L.' ‘:;-.:;17,11.-ir-,---.4--.. N-_,..„'-_,,,:- _,,,„..- ....- V --. ---',.., 1,,ircyrg'A.::2..---.1-•,.--..V.r1r4147.7i„, --";.0. 4.s1 ,,,;:',"-$,',1;*:1•444::','',Ni'''..cil,',' ,':!P:'"';''''4"..\ o',,\;t,,,"-7.--2; '''''''7:.Os,.'''''-''''t- -r-••'li,M.I'c'--v."----7-----:=Ve""',••t. r•-'-r-4-:- fT,A-sr ,A-v -; ''''' i.--;"-`•"`-/- e%',41 st.";,-,,,I.-?":1 6,,--,".,..s:',`;,:-.-.,--. i',, ..,..., r'',.,i',::, 0 s-v,-..41-,,---$: '11,711'..--10 '''''%';:l.A.-. 3 ziP'...;,-f,--4%.1%,r- '7 ..15f• '.."-„--'1."---,r•r""';I:4 -r-::7,---7.5:1 ., ,..;:i, - --,--'''.,-. -'' t,,,,st..-7,. ,ia.. „AI -,a-F,T,..-. e..7,z.... - ''-' ;'''-'''''' -'7' ----&-4-•-_,17,7,'„--,-. 3%-k''''',A '0,„1-v 41.1r,V4A:16., .,-,--tz---,,. ,,A.,-,,,,::,„,,,,,,..1 ,—23,,4 ,,,_ . -,i,,4 ,-,tJ, . -kt-71..„.....,•-••,,•• -, '`-• - ,LIV_••;",4‘•-•-••''''''''''7:4"-"'-'7 IL:'1,!,•11C,M.•;;L'..`..'. I'll;/La - L'r'''.ft-''•".;.*‘.,-`,".1.-.411:',... --'..''''' "---• _ ....,,,......-..,72,A;,,, •..•:. , "....,...":,,,,...„,...--...,1„-,-.-a•-)v r”-- f--‘*. ''-, — :* " " '''''''' - '..'o, '..,*1**-',.-*'' --....,:r-"Y -.,V-, -57. 7,.,'' '.!•• . €."-..''. --... ' . • ' 17_ 1,..,,it.is ! .10" - ,I. r t'w...-T 1,•,; • 0 .,:'1 ...L...,....,...,.6 1 t;,,.44:Lft't i ' .- I , rala:1111". '# ., ..,.. • . ,..3, ,•ki;Op. • ,,...), .. 11111.. . -' li .,',I• -I. :,. - :t.3 • 1.. t• . I\ 0 _ 'I i ...: f.t- i 5.11. 111.1!1:1 1 .----- 'T 4141 144'N. ' • ike,, , •I . . , w, -,-4, ,,.• r,.., • ,,. 1 l ' ' 4 4' i'-' ' I. • . 1\\\\...,\ 0 iitt .).1 ,,i, r.„1. ;•,;;;1;;-viit.l;...r•!:14-1 ri:_el..71::i;r:• .:;...! ..,:71 ••.,. . -• ORO a -1' 00 3,, ' ':"tilti';,:3 „ 111 • IkplifIt'r ...11)..,II)11 to i k',, I' ' ;•,17‘t).•"';I: : .• r ,-; )1 1 .i:•.-. .1,-'1' .1 . •0,1'-:- 1 _ 11,1 ... ...,,..... . ...• . .- ,„v, , ,,,,... ... . ., ii 01. ..?....., . ,. , , 1.1„. 1 . .„,:,„..,,,, :• ‘ . ,, ...: , i,111-11.1rt_ ...t, 1.5 2\ii - 0 _..„1, ,,,,,„„ , • . II '-,'-'1 '- ' ..,,,i i; ,..•.-. ..., ' ., ..-' ,..,Jti,i vslrf.. t -.:' , ';L •, 1 ..••' "II: • .• • 1 (1 • I: .1..,1 P , Al.f..401. 414' .._ .. ,2) v_it, ,..,. . , ' 1:4-4'.`;'!•.,-..,' A •4, ..: I( _,F.--4'.... • _ „... ' - t I ...„Ii li1 .• . ..6)...:,v,. ; •• •,,,..:. )_,: . _ • • , ., El .. ,,,w•- .,01 • .,, •,...p a 20.11r.VV11111' ''': ' 1 I'- t A 1110' i__Z_ , f•,VSi)4.),, ,` I .„i =" ' 1 •. 1 • i . ,10501),111...iillat.. 1 '.1. ' • 0.1.1 •.-",‘ .., .is•• • LI• Ii2 -'1'' ' IS 11-•01!1•,i .•)ti ifi'l'' • . ? -,._ s•-' I.4 fir ,,,t. 0 R •:d .. ------;*rOl''it ';1:"; ' I Do '',.11 e it, 1,1,1„.:1. , . ot.•:t!,-,1 •',„,',or... • •1 q.r..1.• •i . .-li'll) ...1q.k! e;..!.1,;,.',1 i s irl,!•.. I':,,I.4,..7. ..0.,.„4 1,,,.: ,, 9 t,...' 4. t_.,y •k's•• . • • -. 1 \ !) Ijiii..!,, Ars. .p,;p"- •-- ; 1'i; ;;;; ' ri,?Il th-' ''-' ,• ii' . -I I- I- jcp • . r i .. ...• ., 1.• I • •.r,:. ' 11,';,,F•• il,... . .„, • •• .' ' . -3,1 1„ .1 itilltlik. : •-i .1 11) I . •':..' ''. Ilh',..'t r,-,, ... li,,,,., •, 1,:\pal 1 , 110 Wr -1' '1 ''.--l'S' 10 )1 .:i 't-vrc - • :. • _ • •% , • -- jt, ,..,,.. • 4. , .14... . , 4., .. ,,,./.7.4 f,,.. II ,‘P. • 1 e . ,. , 1 ; . .. •. - • -';:-41...,11,11:iiii '; 7 '• t if-•:','7 r ... _3:4 • 1 C .%.• sr/ . .••, ° I atgitip 4. -s• t ,•. • . , .,..1- ; v.,- , , f".4' ? It' 0.. 4ft • • •• •..4 •ill .. • • • ! ! • --41L ill f ily Air 1 1 • , /.... ,,.. •i-' - ) i. I, .a.:'. jr.. F.- ic,i A ....,0 ii..; • ... ..,,, i . • ___ ' • • . . ill • 11 15 '' e , ' , - 1 i; • tv ft Lar.4:71. n,'F. i 47 i •-:; •... • <kr , 'V , . , iiiit 07 dil . - • , .• ...1. '..:.''•'/I.: ' , , • : ••••• ' v•., ' ''-1 4., • v ‘,0-''f i; ,,', ,•:-..- . . . 0° .. -'1.41rw ) ••• .' •- 0 :', .1 1-‘,--r,e1,‘ . tit . .-' - '-'":1 :0 1 -*i 1 ' Wl•-• -..-f,, .1 -• -4-,- :\,,f,z . f.ill. .4f, . :- • -.; '1.. . . U. • -v, _ ,. , . i. 1„ 1 1 t••1). t it ,,I , , .. •, 4 1; . 4A.L:., '..:.., ..p.i.•...w..-.. .;.., - / -%,ie. • -' :-• 1 ..r.:, 1 1: il.-1! ' . . . ,/ • ...... •., ',...f. .. ..f7....' 'S- ,• i ' , '11-', :t ) .' . %... • •, / .--^ 1 f .• t- ' ,.,1? •••":;•-• O. "fl-• ..... ( • , •111111' i?, i - . ...,.• . •,,,,•,•,•-..,:„.„,••• ..-:,--,2:--,; ,.;„ ,•,••••t .. lc .. l• :147Fit? %. • .,/, 7N N;,ier-:A;,:1',.. 4 ..1*''. -,...:,' '..' • 1 . ,,,,,- e•,..0, . ,, . 4;,- •Aiv,x,V.,,,....„,,',..- ri .., ,!,••‘. .•, , '; !.,:„ ,i•, .• ,r rs Ei ._ , • . 4 , • .' ti , 1 •• . ve..Q.:•00,' ''`- •. rii1;:k.ii' ..." '•-_e•CFI 4, : I ...' • ' .•:* ,• r•a; 1 r.'0', ''.' .t•tiV 'i 4 4 ..0. ' .; . % , .'• .. `VW, -, !e':...,t,i,'ti''-''--g - P.64.‘"..ili.' . .• , t •5•1). _. '', ' • ' -- --.!.=,• : , 1,, ,,,,i '?i. -. •-•- !",•,:a •.:'i,-'4•..,. . ..... . Atrt .. . ',. - ,, .1 .:1,----- ., t' , ....I!,.. '.. L.. -7,,, yk:frA 4:,._."--''••Ai ti ..,-- .., - :.' ...II '' ;:. . ' 1. ; t..1 il' , . . \J.•\ • 4tiV e. ,;,...."•.11. 'ff' :•• ''''. 6 1, .;, .•! •4. ' 1 ri f.. ; ' 411.7,‘ A, ••. . --Itikli .73/4't ii • ' 'it ')!' .•/ •" ' ' '? .- •••t.' - k 1 I t :,,,•••• - '•• !;.• ./ . .• ' --• . 5. \i, .. • . . '.i''; ' t*Vi& .••h II •.' • ,,,,'':4-..' ' ' i... ..1 4 ..' V*!!, . Z. •,. ..-ji. 1 1'2' 0 - • • • 1. -17! l'• .• t ; t. •1 1•• - I,f: ', L. ' , A.- 'P,' , . ,i:•-•tri . A 1,-i.--- A 1 " :17',•k• fii • ' • e& ''-' •7 ' •'• ,A t.>,...„.. -..,,• ,.• 4 •., :' I, :••• ". • ;','1 ?kr:,., ,, b`,/,'•l''; •'.11 • • ,, . '.1.,'`ir 4t.,:‘,,"..-1,;'.,,,i; • I.., ./ 'i,..• 'It T .... •A,, VV.'•*;*'::*''' ,!.:*)k •' *II. •i . „ 1 4. . ,.. '‘••••:*: ** * .•12'' '1 ' •' ''''' ' '' •.. ' \.1,..•Z;. ,L..4'..‘ "t, .. .----, ,.. .- , 4;1: .1 : , i t. ; i' ,,. •... •P',...i.,,,, . v ,iih, 1 •i 1 I • ' •• \ ' -.... ., ; i :: La,,T, F WA' .''/ ' . ' li. ' 1,I a I Iiiis li. \ -,-.. $ I. ,. •-•.: ' tk• \ . 4111,•?-----,, .•• : , i,: (i.- ,1 ; •i ' 4 4! i•b•• 'a l't t• s.,•--tt .., • t I's a• • ok. t. \ 1.•••..• k• • l'• ' (4 • • 'I: ••. . . . . I. . • 14, ..... .....,k t J.- tt . . • I:". . , • .1!••VIA Ls' • l'i-', f..: . ., ...,. . 1. r . . • L .i, • 11.-.1- q ,, . 1 .s, . • A )..,•,' ,../4cr t , ----__ , a • • fAt._ . lip', ,, 1 si 'I 1,76: . ,../, •,, .,, it .,1 ( '', ,"-- ! P' / .0 4,,\ >i 4-. . .,, :- I',,-,.;*. - 1 .f• : it•. P ....r ; 4 -•,-, ..,i.: i l' ; , -7'r:+1731- ' , . _.., _ - •' '1*, •-••••.. .ri; . er-,,y,,;', ' .v ,71,kv.- .., - . .---,-.: , • 1 . , , _.... r‘ ..,"'..... .'1 ..,e. ,I 1.... • •-•' ••• 4 74 4. 4,41,,.16 11,411k.... . i ,,g,"1:,!,',... ,A ::_. . .... C) ,,,, ,li /it tht; ' ' ' Is -1F4 f:',:i.•;i. 4;r . ,• !J. . f s.01d' • b ! - 1- .. I\ . ..)-' .' ,..e , - •''r. a'. pet f,...2ii• '''''',... ,Y,'. ' , ',.. ,t1 ‘,-.,7 •-: .';: , , _ ... c::-, . 4.%,. ' pq:4:' •*"7' '. ''-' ,2,...: .41; ?; ' ,• ,,-.. . ,. . - ,.. • = • ' •..._•==.-', , _ • . .•• .•--- ir :-•,--,,,,;-'7" -•,. iir' r 1 ....1 P •'.,?..1-"••••••••• V 1•." -/ rif jai; •!1' ''';'''''.7:;:-.;5pg . .,Q• . . ' V*'.- •••''''';,...•;4-7r?`,',...il ••''' :•, ,. ;:r;. ,4,''''' •ALI op ... . •. ._.,..c •-• -;.- i'•-, •,-- . ir: ,', - ; ,I-) - :- •''',1.'.li.•:4'•1 _I •'• Y- - .. 1 it:„,.... k.,,....) ' • . - 1 ___L.'"•"-V_ , ...1 ,,,,,,Nvp.,,...,,,, ,.. . ,*:1.1i5.:v...,-,.. , ...i.',INi .t '• i'- ' ,--,-,'--,, • I , ,; ,. • .. .s- - 1-A0:-•-•-'", ., , .3 ii/••-- ''gul.-ii 14. - =t5-_-;if y ' . r, ."A",-..1?z, -: ,,..,,--.: =. , -,' .':., 4.2.-,' .', - : ' -.: -', . ..,_;,,,,,,,,,,, ef. !$' ......6, E., , ,,„ t,:-...;-7 ..iii. i'-'4.,1/4'Ali': . iiii,:,,,6'; fli tr..';-1:2i....,„1,.'-;- it-4- 9 •,• , “ . . ••• : %.:15:,,ii. *'' -•,, -2.Itj I 1 - ''' I f . ,,- .- ,.....,4- 1 ‘--..'- .. 1,,at;13,411,..4';A' . -• '•.-- '4/71 ie . ., ' • , .,. ,. 'ir2i/.3 ffeR -...4.„. irl -f •;•-..- , •'• •- / ,' •A,1.5,,•• -it') fi A- --fq: ' • •-',;,,,,, -7- — ,..:,,,e------------- .,, ., , l'.,tt•I',/' ! ,I, .,. ,._.•-• • ,., ..,4:,-Ps - 1 - - 4.;ri , ,-,• - ‘,1,- / ,i^;'',.,•.`.1t',',''. nt-.,.I-,:i:.i4-r•.,•-,,•';"„i :g am,VIg,01Vr,_,kP1-\.-43.•.=,.ay.,t i.ii.=/..,=A,,1,• 1• ,iId .7 , r -i--P al r 1 . ie1.ts-•.i., 1t...r * #• ftt• .. . '.Or :,r.i,=-.f,,•4, '....,. -, ....I,.-/„„a_.-,',4_1#1-..1/-t 0-•-,r.;.--,-_„i--/0t_p,_0, _ -.------•A--.- •,,,- '. ,„ • i /,' -5.--,..,..„,-,_ ZIP'' :• ': '' -- ..: : .: i': ---1 ;•• ,1 t 1.li , II,' ,:. : . ii,\,,,,,VIV"..; i r .I , •.•;i0;re*r . '1...q.14.' . . r ' .1•10 v•-....3. : , - r ,' /'4-,•''. ..&". tt'''t,e) % \ is (. '',";te-t'1„.f.t).2:&?;•tepsj,...'. ,\ f i i i-. le.• '..„. ..1 1"...1`-••i ,, .4 : atif ...____-• I • C?.1.4•• ' -''...,4 -.., '' - ' Itt 114, . ,s?.4, . :r ;;;;;t. ,i'•-. to • . - 4..,..:f qt° .i#4 iP . ›-. '-'-. ; • ' Aro ,c,..:4„.. ,,-,...-:,_-?, )4,11--- l!i.41!›, ( '11): I . 4.14''')',. 1•..:(,,•"Ar • I 1 fi g i a„„..._,••• /$' ,,, ,4 k."1,' tk • ''/ ''t,: , if .:04.--,-: -.., • - SU 'NMI 1,,,,.„„._ Mkt - lie 1 , -, , fili- 1:411, n*.4-.v I.1 ,-- 1 '7 4 :i ', ,.. ' ,,. "-- -'-'..- • ‘ 1 .:'-:-',.. -..."'• at '.„,> t.t I Li• °C. 1" i • %et.' ' '\• t '. sc.i.::`-- 4*-1 - ' '•S"?'''... ,( i '•-:,gt,„ ill,• .., 310-/_, •• • i. i , 't•4. ,__. a , , --_, I. , , ' • • •,..• t, ..*, '-- '''‘'•t• .41,t-. /•''ki d / 1 ----- i,•, ,"k,i ,;.‘ A _ .--1,17,1 , • ;Are....,,,. so ta . i 5 !,..•• • - -- ,P 1 .-:;#1.9 0''-'"4:•:7,, ,-,_ ., - ,2i• . 1,I,I', I ' :...-.333,0 1.0., . , , .•17 4 lb _ 0 , • /.1 I.,.. kt KV'.'-' • I I.' • 1" A. 1 • .. °'•' ' .••••. .. i.• Alalk i . .. •• '•II I •... A' 1 •,- i.e. ),.1, • ,.. .1..'• --.6-" ki V ' ,• /,, . • - . -...,,s, ;-- •- ••. '' -0. el,2. • / I . 1.411•s.%. ,,.',1• % ,N11 ' / „,;jr, , • •'; , I'ie / • , - .',. _i-. : ,'',,4 4,1,17 4 ....As P .S. .,,, '.,. • . . i ; - , ...,,,,,,,,,..A., ,,..'4-1v, ,..-, ,\ti ,>t,- • ,, N i.?4,is/ 4 . • .... ... t ,,,,,,, . ,, ,,,c,„:,.,,,,,.,„,,,• ...,,,. ......„.. . .....„ ,,h, , (L / •••,.. . . 1 ,I,Ailt / i›.• kit - • -,,,,_ --..- 'x,..7'-',,. , tiq.';'•• ::''' 1'' •..,, I••is ,, -N • le 1-...P.-4,"- • -..' t s -'''•,,,. •-,,. '•/ i / ,,,.. '''• -ti ..,.. ..,` ..,:,•-r,-''' I • if•V',. • '.•• At.' : , ,..,....,. \ "ii• , 1,?, / :„.,,.. '-.1,:.•:•"-.. I II- ,, - :1'\-1,.;:`,..,•---- ifil' , ' 'II, , ) 1 •, li r 1 Z •'ii\ A, 'ht'i, ki'q • ''''t \';'` . :.'•'',-•,,-----"----------- - / iiiii ' / . , . , . ---'""41111113301Waraggw' .-,,;---=7.-,---- -.7_. ---" _. .. .. -- •77- -..:.,............-- :•,-... --0-.'"- ----- .t", ....r....- ' - -'-- — -,.. --— ---—_— ,+:''''':',-s'er,'-'1,4Pr.,'„',i'''''' ''' '-.`-. . -,,','':,r,"'`'••1•,= ..•/," ..1 - ____-------- “-,:c!, • --•.----------- ---- ,... • 76':.• ._. . ,,s,,.,7-,..--- -.2:. - . -----,-,--.--,..------,"---"-- .-• ' . Tio- •,..- ' __...auft,t • . r..---.C•ii; . -•.: . ......-1.'"''''i . ,-. ,:. , .4'4'..•,• ..41.,' -.',•A•411 ,..0,..(' ,-..-• . ...% -...-•Vmpor • . • --__•„*.;••••:-.1 E=,...:._:-.„, . .</°°.-! • ••• __.,n, 1,.--,....,V-.•fi:„., •,.. , : :•. , -•.4.33,-; -,;',--'-,-,...-1 t..,AdhigrufSS'r,f;14:,-.1,'.... --,' 0:. ' '. 0>-.v. •.,.• : t• .;,` .:' ,-...„,z,g',.....i 4 j:7-,Aiies.-4411. 1...w."..,''.‘:',A.--- .:, .. . - -.-.Z.3R ,•-1,-- ..;.---.? - .91•4,:__', :,:_."*,•-_*.€5, ,, iri!4 : t A • V":11. .....:'...; ' •- - .'-1;„ . . - -„ •"" ' -;,......;,...d.... /... .- .7,7V-r-7-7:-.,-- , -7:-.,7-.*-` ..,, e.,, "*.,,, ' -,''; ; 't',-.' ;'‘,..4 ti.:: ! J•••' , '.,*,`•..' /....,'; i —" "..2;?.....;:.itii 01004:y.t.':' -• ,. . . •--' • Amrei• l'-'•.a..t.' :----. *---. /;;:fr;`,.4...,... amm / - li - - ' , .•L.....0..... _ - ,,,ert:•.), . ,,.1 . . , • ., 4.4,,, . ,.,..„ .... ,..,e•-......„. „ ,42,3*,14.„1,?'-' .44.Re...,... 't ." r, :44,4', 17...•i•ii.a-. -0 111. P.- •- - ",- -.4 ; • 1 - • - ''', - - '574,73‘4`.."41t17;:4-44• ,.,,•, '44 WAre'''aiii • ''-''- -'L MIIIIMPIMMEIMIN\ '4'-Y...4.1. ' • _7.'''..4Vp...4,,,..1i: . e.'fiii .,!,. ,,:p: utdimm•pmEmumgm . ,mmilms,, 1 '?'',s'e '"•7t--N-i -----.---17"--r.'yM1'".„....,_,..A...- '4 • .,...•72/ ".- -•-•-*44,7"titi wanimemmimadmiwisissimmisimmairm !moo_ ffs,,,•:„. •,"::,4e.;,2,s_ _,..,:,-;.,-,,,_.,:....4.7,1,,,4„,..,,i,n1c,....-:2_,-71._iiietr,4,7,...:,-;;:-,...., .... . *4...-47....:w . _. / v,,,-,,',.--.-- c---_,..z.,,,,/,%,,,,,---- 4„......................________,. .. ,,,E----p,.,: ....2. .---1...,,,‘, .-.: -.--• - _.--41,. :4 7... A .. UIMIMMIIIMEIMIIIIIMINIMEIMIEME • ____4-io, ,. _- - ....644.041 . -.f, - .L-• -- - . /••••_r_. /• Sal".7-1,oft k 4' -- - ., . • 1 -- :. ).' '..e* - willihr•-, • '.... .. -.. ...-Wara .•f''. i'••' StIt-. - ' —,_ .e.f • ' ••••., , ...,:epos* !__.-.-, -..-,..a.•. .-. Agttrk ..:a..4,i„r.-....:,.•-4•4,.1.,.,:;e-,--.7:',-•:t:e.•,......>,,' Aii, " • _ . •.a..m;‘- 1ei'•'•."l%...f.a.,.-•-.,7:°.7 ' ,:q,#.';;0;:,.-•4"7. -4'.1, "• 1, g".,p"' t.,..7.-.:4" l - -,-.ia1.: :47,.-.4-,. ,.: ( „ - 5- '1.•,.'."•:..',,•v.• ....-- --... --.':-.--, • -'..7 '..9 :,,' '-'"'. -- ...• -- ,3t-7,',..,t4.',..:.Ng- • le . ,•:--(1's.'-'0,-.•''--`-"t'-- -•,-..- IkA An 4 '-''4,•.441%V..: '4'. As • . ...s..ii..2.. ' ""4 - ‘,.. • ."..,I' - • ' lir.' 't/-4':.-74;*,q1'-'''-` 411.6"`• - -.. • i . • 4.......„. ‘'' •- '1,:.t.- ' • . - , ,_ -,..•di,.4,,vi ei . .1..1 ...*::.. ............ . E"---'-'-"--",•r• -•,- , .,:.11-7 -Yri7 '•••••••.••••••• ' 414...erb,440. .t ... ,e. .. , - ... :. .e. . ..11.7.•,. IL,Ir. •,- /I:1)1/. 'I/ Zi''' • / . : ) -_... ed /.....• ...,...- -:hi; . . Mail- We& letaA• ---'17 ... 'Pe441-: ;44.,..r •-.. ,.... • , - • 11.03 Me- a _ ',....% • a Y ///'4friel • i.,. • • . -iifti, 7 ,47,,• :se ., _4_47 .- •.— afterp — .110alli /2411-- ,___ - - egg" 41%10 .2.WV 3fogaile li• . ---1° 0 • . — , I ‘ -- I -.. li ORM ,i ;_, •. , / ' PIN Ay, ' IVAN - •- "lift MIAINIL- ,- i ..,1 • _-- . • i i a 0.lit.- --) a .1."1!Nillidillt- glIN . , --....• ..• / SY ' g • 1Li ...., ---am...._..) ekt0Ai-,- -- 111141N.1-,..--10-,•.: ' °atilt A'VAri. . • . C_______=_I --,- • f--,- , , • ,.... •L..4:I a.. ' P-.‘oz. . L... -11- ' (--L . '.-41.)t,.i. , .. ..i.T4s9 ..,...4 •....) 'Mk , . - - - — #'* ilrift 4' /ai. ...i, ' • -------:'' lift' -7re-A • . ,•• ---.) ... IMO 4 ilir ear• --1.-7::/* 4, • • moo; . ... , . ,. _-_, • se • . ' 5--c , 1119)-- • '..:s ^. . -'-'----'. 1 • -ea -4- i , .-.--. • • ., _..• •..- - .. -. • - . _ . . ak, •._AV it--.,,,,....) :.. " . .,,,7-7';/ :-. . —' .5.! ----:_,,,,, • : :, pmlir - ,..,,,,,. ..,.L.,.,.... .0..,- . . ... , _... , .,, . ... ,...,, ..._ . . ..,...,.....„..:. •. • •ii-.... ..'PAW7."'''•`.:'!-imi '..,•; " ,P---,..,•. 4.t?",,;. ' t.'..'...!. .:-.4-..,..__:- t,... ",',:il..-,*_ :,.. . .--) '.......,..t-:,.,..,.- * • ,...._.-- )111 0 . . • ' I s., i 1 11 ‘ .+ts_ ,k.i,. \ , - 1 s ti..4. I-'• .i. II,. ....,, , t till - ••• '- -T'S i t . 'IR 'A .•ir. .! ,- i ,, ;,.. :.:. i-1.,;"1.2h2:---. 1,;! • 1 f;Cil A A. - - Klq1 111111441;:iiiiiitl11%,`.! \ ---- . . , 't-Tti•:-.41. 1, t .r . ---. ,'I"' I, . : s 8,•'' ' '( 11. illt ----)_ - -_ . . 1 '. '4111' V ••I &=,•A 161 t ikile .1 . 1 , 4 W-..4 • i•A . . ' -' • , i i . • \.. -- , . ,.., ,1 : • 1., , \ . - -._-,-.,-- , • " -:;?:-. ' ''. I \,_-2-P.,,.:::::,;:,',,IciTti:i,., , .• .. ( biel t ..-.9A.;%! , Illien, tn\ .% 1_A 1 i.1,, •,,....y., .s.ts - ,2' .1 t is d 1 'i ,•:/',;',;.•, '20, ,•,D( .-VII:,:...:‘ „I, III A . ... • ';'114;,',',.:i'•----- ‘ . • , - ...., - • ,:.••. . Pc ' - -11,gtAivk•.;:.0"-c*,•".s.", ' V; _"' ' ‘1 11 , _ t. • 1 i N• 3 . 'i.., .„ \ • 1—•';'0g;;:-TV: . .1 1 '-' -'• el. ' 1 - • •••;. .1: 1 $',. 1 il . I • ii DI 1 . v r 2 - IfivC- ',!;)/,'1, '11.4 110 ii l'i....r:.: -...-••':, —, ' A 41\, ,•-'ili 1 , al. . I ?!"., \ -., ,'///•Ar•/;‘,&0... ;.'44'.1*.rr-.A.- - - —•' ' ''' . -" t>=1.'•'13 I,i 1 :. . .t. ,. ,• a • '..ii.\''.',41;',4, ,ft;, 4 z INN \ 1,411.,',0e.:;;;• •,-- • ,• -, , ,,.. \ ,.,-.,,.0-kr,1.4,,..: 1 • ,,K..., . .7•• ,..-",1„..,1 4,„ • .... , _,'• , Y,•'.4 I);"::,, - wz:,..-1,--1,----se ' i 1 . IOW ' --3 _i i. .- • 4.--,r/,,,:_•_-, ---. -.7," tfii N.N141.' . i - •-•;I `... :.- .• ;,,, 1 1 • 0 '. - '. — \ _ _ii. r. :::„ f‘r ill t • . '' ,',",,r400;-.,-.... ., i t,.. 1...: 111. '"" • I .., il 0 w !. • _ ov. y ,;.i.iii--• - . , .. 0 . . , .,,,,it- G,,,',-:)1 . ,e-.1.i. :, ti. .v....,,,,,,.,',f,i-s.--, :','.. 1,I1 4.,, .,'4. 1.,. ', • ':.. :. ' _..1,- (\-''''''''.';,f.Le i , 0,!---r-',11, •„ ik,, ' .,-,i; ..,;...,,,,•.;.•..,,ta•‘ .,w t., ''s141,.. • 1 . 4, ‘1 1 Ait• ' i• , i_Van• .Z.1. '' of ,o 1 • • . -- - • . . - ,,I.,,,,,,,,11.01,.. .11k•.) • S s/ ••••••' I, - , ,,,..I i ..• l• .''t.A iNi ' 1 e , • .1•1,, -1 • I , ' -- it -•,- J.Z. ..., it .. ,J,10.) ,,•;,, n1 lit, ' •.'tit) • -lit ). ,.,,4 . 4 .:-/,•,/,'..• A ,,4 . :1 1 , La •14 4 r" •' N cil t , 0. .,,,..„..-oo-cr• - 11 ;:115,1.,:::.,k,6,:;::,,'f,,zi..- .tl.ttli-'1'''.'•'-'ir:;',e.,:ii!:'.:14,1::,..f.,..:5E'),..1 .‘1',.":.'.,.,. ''',.111'/':". .‘1.11/ . 4•1).-11•''':1'.'''tt.1:: *:.;Ns i,: r1 :•$,,.:.1:1A,:01;5':1'40..L14111:7fr'f;'' ,!'s V ra i, 4.Ort • 1 t . . '' -$.1 $/11 ii 111 -NI) l',-..7 i •" 1 1 4,... Y2 , I:''' ill , 1•-• • sii 0 . ,1'..f1,1 .1.14,t . ,el:"`'..: ,,-,;,..;,.1,4•14,11, id.. lil ,•, ri.•;4'. I ''. II ' It\'11, iliticlicilil II 1711,0110 11 , • -111)14 .. ki 11121r it ...: 141 -w'-sr,.i -I t ' ,''. , , t,t!•‘‘‘A ' 1 ',.•, ,• . !ii_ , . t.1. if,/ - ..0\‘A 1 1 1 4,1-s'e 4p;.•,`. , ,e,. kii 6 4..-21::•....i"i,'.r'1 r*'"4-1 I'::: . • 41.1 , -`' •.-,•:,--..• i ,,- 4-.' .1 , .-. f,12 . , A;:ti. 1 g ' i • 1 tif te) . ') • "'11`.-.• ' - 0 , ...- • •-iff?'.4.-`-..f ii) ,'d 7, ;'t 1 1:14 ...,4; I.e.... .4•No - 4 , 4:- • ' '''''' n '4 ' ' ' e• I,• 1. I ''''''-I-• k ' ;, ';•A ''' ; t; r -: - • +#i 11---, tot; 1 , . , - . .7. ,„,101.A i -.: ', , '•0‘ ", '1. '1).r. "w 4 r •/.• 4 • • -t 4f'?' ' Ittf , 1 -...1 - . I -1 . - . . • • 4' / 1 i 4 *,?.-t.•btik .,:,.., .- .. , ._ 4,..4 ii ,V•• !ylk .,,,'-31,74'.1;:r,..•'••.- ' : /6 4 ,.. .i. : :. . . ,. . . •,,, ,, t .'Z''V ."'•t°1;•.:;•.''',' .,../• 7• • , i ... .. ..,•,,,,,,1„-svk,fok`,•-i, ,'-:, A •.. I lt.44i:. .' .. . .- Air' .P.'1" •. -." ' „.:.± ,/ I t- ' 4.1, 'C'". '' ii:;. • 4;7.::";4: "" ...C:;'..1.,,-,f "i-.:. f -'-',../ .•• „. 441:4 1, ' , lirtilt. , , f 1 .. .i :, • 44,11C, ,\\ ,,,,i',1,.', d -1,1 ' ' , ) i.• r ..,.., ,.,..sr-i.z.`•:1 4,,,„i ,Air , -;; • ) --? , ' ., .4 ./ . .) • 1 ' -. s'111.: ' 1-5. - 1.,3 53Pipifli: . 4.,,s. ,... DI -:‘ ,-;',g4P.,.:' . 6 PO i.: ) „elva.. , . , (,. . A,„11 " v ' '''' : 0:•1- 0;-,.. A ?-• .1,:i.-, • , ,•?4,4,4%,,, I''t A ""•-i , ' • N • • . , i . , . ..: , .,,,,o•p - -,. , + ...k1;,: • '1 r i •rir , ; l •1. i S •• • ' —''........ '''''...---• • , . :,'l'' V 4' 1• ..• 4,o., A ,7••• .-;$4-'4. -'1. , ',1;r',4'.•,$) i 1. 0'.')\ . ' '' ' 4,.t: ''-" •x.. •r • . 0.-.,,',,. .e .. I V", ''7, •, .. — ,,t.l. 14 •11: .'1.- :•5„,-:i • k. , , , . :., , T t • ..-4-••`•••• k-,11•1•4.'V .4•$ji j . V '47“.•;1.T.-,if.fls- .V.. ..j •..r. .. I.ltilf, ../ I . . ••• V '...T .rit'',?'1.P.;it'. .41* tai , , ,,,, • / , ' II - ` ...'1 . ' ',• ?I I : - _ ::' ''' . .. f •• ..' . '''-F:':',.'...%'\4..iv,"•''' ) Ay;, i .1 I V 1 1 ' •, . ., - . • ., . ..,.,...t,i.'-;:••••,-...-1.i0...1 ,. , :•• - •.'•..c...:::: '•• ' " ••- ..''• ', ,!...;:1,. .1;..,;,.'.A, .,-'44,1i.: • . • - -, .4,.'^':.:2•-• '''k..- -'..1q•L''';; I, .:,z-•'.', -.4,.:',....^...:"ATZ-,.. ,;,..;.•- -:-1"-I:- ., • -:- •i,,,.. . %,..:;.5.41." -'-l''''---:-,;'''''''`"1.4:Z::?^.^.4e'''',.;:'.--,"`:",,:k4^%/1')'..15,-Z.:,?,‘L-11...','•,- ,., --1-Z.-•-1;.• ''''''• ''.--73t:0'.. ...,,• . ,,-^4, '•'''4 '''''-' ''.;^-‘''q'.1.4i5.' .. - r••--.- -- '-; .:"•-, --"-:,-:4/-"f''':-;,""--4;)'''' '':, -P.' '' '• ''''''"."3'..... • .'t'f-le ''-',''...4,7-.A.J''E.".., :-;'hi- ,,./t•I'qml'-',•.-t..- 4 1 "i''4:4;';'-.1^'...i7- : '- .•...,-,.V."...1•'ae*:;.-`...•=es:;,^„tirr...;;Ii.&&,. .g•iffX41:"4:•i'-•• . -zr-"f-i-.---P 4'Ai' ;4.4.1., •4:,k.,.,,„ ,..,.--, ..,:..,,,-•.- ‘,.-0.--, , . '••••••".. -,•• - ,,,,,,„ A %,.gitZ4,,--,,e'• :'R.-73,1,:. ^c,t;,..e P5V,....,.,,--'.,A,?;•• .,r ...-__, - •4.--,,e,i.X: r• .f4,!--).:‘ ,?!.? • - ..:. ;,..ry_,....4,-- - --: :i,.. • 7-...,.., - . • ,, t„... . .--,-. •.- •v.,. r . . '. . - j;-: •'4.'1' •- '• ..''' • '1..."":"-k-''''..• :. . ^ -, ":.• '• A* ,. ':.* -'''•r. ' - ' -11RF4t ....-.Ao.,.,-----„,... ,...,.....,,, e-- • . .-....I' Lt:0•7, .. • ••• Y . ; '.---.-., or':-,•-..-.:. • . - "--.. :.. ••," . ' . . ..,',..„:',1.7...'- - ')........"'''..-:-.„.., , 11 ..wir _ ' earrefri t'.14,+ ,, '.... ''' ..' . . 4• ,_ , „....\45.,,,,„....ea. . . -.-..... •.. *..-6-,i,' -aw, . -,-•• - „10-2 •r- ,,,-,, A..:.--,-,• r...1.:..:. ' - -- • - ••*- ••-, ' .-• - --,. - -.,..-4,--:,-.,- x.., ;.. i.,,,-- . iir v0.. •,4•441,: - g Iv Ye--, ;- • • • , .i.viiii:!„, ow .=-.- , ...-=. 1 ' '.::.,. a.4--,-...-i,,:..e. .. _ ...I.-. ..,..,, /.1,‘---- t . .7.* • •t41''• i6w* • ' •. ilk''''' ' " ' •I - *,?...ectia.S.; ." : t..,...,.,1._•_•,..r. ,, . ... ,-, . . . q4_,,.*:,.:46-' _;.-- ::".. .':.,' ..-.0 .0L.:....5.1$45.-: ;,- at..,-. -_ _ ,.„ .-, ..,... .. ,-,... .- ‘ ,,sty...,-,.-. to .1:2 - . -- - _ ...- . *t .1 -,, • •4.: ^1t,..,,.*: 1. ',.4 ..- , ,V.L.a. - -- 7 Am.,, - :;,-..z.-.._w-h--:.1.. - , Trj, . ca._ ,___ . , , -,,,,. ,. . .....iin - • - gm* i -,-,-,.,.. __„.. I .• i.•• .i. -...... . . ... .. . i -1-7-•i • • • ..1' '''' . . . --N --,„.....-.;.-------- . .. ..... .. . ........•••••• "'''"'."""n"______ .• •...: - 1 *,.. .... • . --'''' .- ....„,. ........ ............"--- ' !• .^igni • %_,,IS -..,.-_--..---- --; _-.."8.1 •I1* . ......., r _ . 'NF.Jihal - lOr• --ab 4. ..,. . ... • . , .., .2,. ..l• -,.• .. ..„......r ic,.....,11,01. ii....' ,-• .,, 1111111111.....•6--:-•":"'" - ---. .\;.: '........ ....„....._ E.,4:::. •04.- . , ID, ,'' ___ ___ ._ •. sf- 'i :or•••=-' .....1'' -. Nil. I- sr 4'• •i• '-'''''•--- ,i'%-;•:•-a, pr. 0. • c--. .;.• ----• WAN . .... ,„ •4110.,-.=1-- ,. .. ." ' a 611111.1.1".........111.11."....immall r -1311ArC!5911 IVI•'''.. ..--.' -:-,-7.-a - 1-r:- .--—•- ••111. •••/....._wi . • ,,,,_ „et; 6465°' 14kr, . 4. - 5.10................1.111.1.1.11.1, .... : -..,...........,...' .011,..;:.., INS .47.Ji . ' -... dal ..IVW li-t" •Sga .V-- -- -,------ •, - ' ..; tl, - It e. . ' . .'..sionsionaniummoNN in..11.111.11.11.1.71.1.1.1".....11.....1"01.1.1.11 -'- 14,. .re7.1r44,. .•"-If-r- -7\:131.1. 116. t'I '1,. —II • :I .0 • - . ;.:' wow.gNINION10.16/11 * * • .• , . . di , 4,,,,,,......,„ •,. - - • " .'‘-*"" 1--•••-,r;..;'._.illi 04,, %Nei°..s-- "V 7.•- _ _ I flgVI _ . N. ..,10.....c."6-..... • _____. er..• .,... . ...• ' • , • i - - ."-• '' • ,,,••••• ...440.1.1. ',...,r ...-• 4 - ..rd. ., .. . .... , ...,00#0.. ..... • , ', 1•••,..' 45,-., -vl .......... ... .t- ,.4,5,v04i0,,`'',-4.-.•,•'-i'l'•,t0t---•'-'14iwar . . — ..,. gk.. . *•1 ., •P .. . -.-2,- ,•,11 •,. 4‘v . . ..,;,, .:Z• 1,!..F 4:1,,a,r• d- ,.,. ,7-...„. - •. . .- . ; )10:• ..1.0.0.0'• ,,. ,,- v.,„•,. -•••••', '• - 7;1.47;:.''• '`C".r.':.;':':.-1•,17.'•?`:.-' " , . ,,--..,..-- IC'• ..,-, .,-:•-• -;p:.,.. -:: -. -:;--2-;;;;',0"-^1"."-f..':...- -443C-`,k, rz.' :--- : •, i _ . ..r.0.„..... _ -.- I . ir As Or"' r,.....,.._;-.. •• •s :7 _....oe114):,41,-• .. .....,!' vv..: .,., • 0 _ •-•• 1-•;•- ' a .0,''''.-0 ' t'• .0%•,,-,-.4.' "t- ,__---T.-------- ' ______---. -- -, - 4" --%.• :. ;03L' ,•• . , ,. -41.- •." Iii ''''': , ..;.t; '''' .I . ',j .-------'•---' -\ gel!".1-r, I Ar• -----. •,., ..... :Jul.... 1.•01'.0a.iii• . . " - ..- - . • 101H- ,`, . TAO(lik.."•%\ ,. \ -\ --4. 1.-:7 6777.•, , • .' ...:•: .,.,01, -._ 5,_„•..:-.2. ,_, :-....,' I ilani, -•r, . . \..... .„.,,,4022k., • ,II i,1...• s.S.1 OE% • '.': .- —.'et'''2.•:••')....4.: , VA IN., *VW i!911,....' •• 1. ' ofts,.... , • 021111.1."100a •....,.,-,- •005i_-- ,- .-,.01 ,1 .„ii •. • ... ‘__. s 000-00k---- • ..,,,,...k..-,....., , . . .._ , _, 11:153\\0 • - - gem ., .-:-.. v • ,.. ., , •-,ia _,,.....,.......020015‘ ' ,.---, . .1 ,_-;•7:::::,,,,.., .. . ..........7,0,„,„ , • —- - 1. is•,5,- -etlie - L.:3, .„.. . 10 - •,vwitoigr_...."/ ,.......... ,.' . .'.. O.' I'S'''. _ er'...N. iw II.- 1) .-11, +e•, •••••. .... . .t...,..,1„... AV' i , - . 1.,4.... ti •i .-..,....c..„. .1-,T, . - V -iLri- • I•1,i • •• -6,,, 1 it,,,,- - *:\11gS--- -\ ,A.•• ,4‘,11•11.• ,, ...- ,T,j•L--,..2;iii .,,,c.--.. •Ot , ...1 .-.‘,_ vs 0..,••.-- .-• ... % ..--. , --;... $5611.'•—3. "r. • t • -,.. • •4 1 .01---J01 ' • • - A -- - ,-___ger.---.04. k • _ ,,,..,4,_/ --"" -oil.-1.\--11 - . ....eb. . . _ -,;,,,,10.-- . . . • • . . • . . , . ' C-) . .• i r LIST OF ATTACHMENTS 1. Memorandum from Randall Parsons approving the conceptual drainage plan. 2. Parking calculations from August 8, 1990. 3 . Excerpt from the King County Surface Water Design Manual. 4. - Excerpt from the Traffic Impact Analysis. 5. Diagram showing elevations measured from mean sea level. 6. Photographic reproduction of area with proposed buildings superimposed. 7. Letter to Loren Laskow from Lenora Blauman, dated April 9, 1991. 8. April 11, 1991 memo regarding flood pictures.g HILLR\00129.OTR/4.12.91 Seattle ')•!',•-•:•:•,:-.••_-•:"..`-.".-.:••:-. •-'• .---- --• - • -.., . . _ --...---...........ni•IR-15-'91 C3910"2-• 11-,I, . Cll',1' or.,0*";•etc.m•.. • •:'01,-. - i••••,-.. ..0-••••,..,---. :rit,f,....:-.i.7-••• •••'..-,',-•-,,,..,:-T,h,',z•••--14:,..,... -•...-v.:iv,- .•-••.p.,,. ,...e,,.. . ';•..,,•,,::' ,:r.- .;:,'. -: • , ,•, , • . • . i el... -L.,:=..,,,r7,-..--e.......1......7-,.......3..,!v,-.•'k•'-', • L','.r U5 4.4'7F102""-'':-1'"1:‘-'- '4''' 4''''...-',.:.'•-..;,:;','::',:i',;;,-;'?::‘,,.'-•';'3..:,,:•':,,,:;.,":.:.'...:..--•,,,t-,•-.....,,,:•,,:::-_,.,:,..,,:::,.,::,,,-;,!•,„t.„.„,,,,,,,,,,,,....,;„-,;‘,.t,,, .• -,...,.:,3,..,....•. - ,,•,...,,,:..,.•..,-,-„,-,..,,,„:;,... 1,,,,, - .. .. . . .. • • . • , . iet,AP:644tilt--:,5,•zt.r, „,,, ,4. , . • • ...., . • . . .... , . , Orre ci,,,:.i.v4ie..,,e,!„I . .•". •-.-..,,.--,....• • •c-...-• . . • • . . , . . . . . . tri.Nt •'.< .? inn:a . - ' • . ., .- . . . . . . . . ., . • • f-,-4-..,of .:1--i."t_,.,;4...,-.0 . .,' ------•-:-. .' .• - '-••‘.. - • CITY,. eq-2 ::-.;:EN TON , if a • • '. ' ' '' - . '''.._..s, . ' . ... . . • . . . .. .. . . . . . , • .. . 7 Iv t.ri ei 1.--3. 4l. .(4,1.1 •Aqi t..12 1-41 • •- . . • • ., %,..f /1 re% 4 v 11.,.., e.df rr.71;'; . • - ' "- •• . 7 , 1 • '" - ' . . • , . - , . , .. , -_ - ., . - • • , " MATE; , - ' 741,'1.-riltry_2.24.-:i 9g I:J.::: :.-,.: .•.. . - • . ... - -• • • - •- - - - •-. , . . , . ..,.. ,.. . " • •. .. •.- -TOR...O NI. . V -tq•---l...-.-..,'•-.'.. . -- : -•'••,-.-'•,- •• r• `. .''...-• . • ,:, '..• '• -.'., •--;'",:$-:..'-,:--:=;-•-i.-.-, :.•-'•:..,-...- ..--..,,..-....,'......-,.--•...,--.,-,.'L.-•.-.-2-_.. ...,-.._:,. , ' '.-. • :',,,,-. - -•. . r, ,..- .; . . • . , ., . • . . . • • 1.1 ?„,i,„,4-c.-or,PLskini*N62..1-1-1.....'42:07,:t-Caigt•TV 41,VT:41N-A.e,1'F.;7rP-T:AN-•-',• • ," '-:-•,'-, --.:-.. i , . • . • - - .,.,,, _. . ... , - , . . . . ..-. . -..-,, .- _. . •.•, ,-. . • • ' , . ..._......_ , . .. .. : . -., .' -.':*:•,-: .,':,,:.• - '1:- .:',...'-'-, •:. -•-t.',.. 1,-..s•1-P Dr: pa0 colt :/.tva.1 qraisif...14ir4e c.11.Lrt ki.41.... a•ol••,,4 -.1.!...rcrmi4oc,..-14-• at,;••-. • •, • :,,..„' &t a niteti :o. i.kst. l'at!:eigoi".,. .•fl•ilv.itly. i 5.. 199 ..'by The '0.R2 0214,tnint101,-,,,, t16 tieh,, ,01,,:thiLl..,..t.., devaIopet Vi.1-0,1 ile 4.'0 ilTp../:71vi.,,:•6. it ',4t1t the;-(z)ititrrant- emb..'illiti;lcktion•:•: .. , • . e•t-t. 'Mt rf.0:tr.i.to,..,'.a IN•o:;,i•r.li..6 fv-1- t7teivttg.•coic4c. i % :iton-i,i-...;• fo? the tUR • 'e ; withiri tit9 1.$:%Q yto.,1: :1: 1.--.e>.-..iii,L•„.,..A..in Ar.4. Sis21x0rtAtvi.2, 'brit '0.'iil ••••••,•• •4 ,Tift`itlfari`oi-'.:.1 z•cif•••;••;-'1•01i•Cf: • .• .. rilyst:rezni' i.l.i: -1-11, corilirc'ti.:11.0D g.t..tui.t.. M.Y,5r. '''ik'Z' 'V84-01'4'01 i"-5: dte'lllisn dti1M-11-4.. 'ThVie.!:, • .•-. . . , • . ae,,alz shot,.c;,-,.. tnci.u(.1.0; •,..lill riot ba iitaltea.d t(4„::-1(.1dWaill;',i, 1.bl(;*; f.'crlIci-aiTig.ci .,:t4Ina.::, . -, .i......,:, • , ,- ..,.,..., ' • . . . . . .•- .. • ,-,. . 4 at, . 1R.V• 5 t. . . . . . . . . . . . . .1.,:iii;.i.f-i-:/..:Lic_S2:11.741j...'010 f 01.,-%Wit.041.:.14..da;744.10-24,02111.5.j.a.r.i..-.„,...4304- • Taci$e tite.Y-.1,;'..2. .tr.,13t c....!:.c.l .i,at:Bd.. ta tiSAVZ "...itdee-rid.11-It,' l':17.11.'figf.,:ili.licir!. N'...t. itte l:::',"-i•:r41 N4.1itt;.-..,.1.11%;•;;;;;:. • . -,, tha ristd; z,..,1.0.2.touirtit thQ,01.6 .,:...; int;titgloi-ime. •te 1:).Evc-1,-.-? kli.v, fib& ii.,p1Tv.,,, , " -- :-•..- . f..‘,11 7,1,,,,-.... civiiAirl. Iti:oyli. 1,ilt :?...e.;c1 -kidiaitat k.,:•.-4.1. .1,,,s.r.t,,,t, ,..1;./.=.1sc.•,1:-.-..14..A g4.-11-_ r41, :4. • ' .- .-• poitttl; ifit. ..11:•ibeiZ-4i:Itoz '.,'h.c,-- c.•-.•;.o.iQ!-% 14f thC ri*14.4 •-4k.2T,v,le.1 b3 . titvei. 0 tu ,,?.f:!'itzv. ri..ng-ireialf.-;(4.,:. t'yf. fitin f:t ;irkiouiti be, l•rAgicv,Izd J.!, sz,,,P:Ity fe,c:tor of SYk thuuld be itic.,(?•4')*3.- •fil i'i 1!..rile ail.--1.11t, of • i•11.t. vi)...tlizal. ,., ' ste....q.48e b.) lkw fOrl.,:ifts.ilctel,'..iit-in *iA 1•14p..'4.7itif., d%t• ittil'i, tdittle-f,z1:1-0,n, .. .. , (!•(;‘,.:i,c,..,,,t1.,:•.1-,-,,. Eild Ip.s.1,3.:a.....?.r..: cf,•.. Tlz.1 fleitt t.:4,:atn..-1.2:e. 1...;e.. "• hivis.1.1,-....tr,Lkft..P- to. ,r,•-.0fit-se,,:i lobe, . . . .. t- potelAtiOi (ickge„e4 1.1;.ro:1;i14-1),,,tt. is,•,:t fialdg,,. . - • . • . . r:,0 r•Vd- -0-.11,,TstaLpovriliag,,,.: . . • ;r.a.t141.1-1, on i...;,.:-.1. ip...wel .1:.;.0.:‘0.i..1:1 0:5. ctirg ttii .F.,..,X 4-4arit,f;41' Ql" 7.e.,flu.ir.1,-74 ';Af.•.'.•;-..1i.a•-1 Apal'...z..t. iili:Ic'ici ".V.1 ..::N.r.:.=;z1.,..i ',W1t IIICAteed 7.t::, i7Ct.1.4-i', "2-'1; c.C.,1 a,ti: 0.92..iL:*1: tit:an ‘';1*.i.'4 i'e.;•."0;;. iiti. llb k'Al'; Ind. '.1.:kt ':-.tV'-'IthiIrw' 1I.41•fr,ir,.::', Prct•itiod ths'zP7....k.ti,tro,.. c't•-,z.1-:-J4.,1,'-,!.: -. 1 fir',31tr.;?;7kr.. vi;t1.<•avrir...y.c., -;•,-...? Iiii,2A:16..3-1Eka el. itz,t.w.-e.-ul 17traf.X...cw 21-.1VA-441. f0.* Z'''; 3 t•;"Jti It i;f:-.> .1.../1-ntil .:::;> ;:v.!;111.C.-1', r1-..criof.t. f.•:rc,'-••a: wa4;.-t..-f-i:T.:z e,r i:N.,. nool- ar,,.....f; 4,1,1,:li-t-gt if. Z.:7,, -:-11"..."0,4,,E+:•:' '1.),.?,44,11 ',47..1, a I.:,,f;),-,• •1-4 wi.ea,i1F tt"-, pri.livilt.'i•; 'i. .. •-fltvi.v Ilekspti '42'..i.g.; il.r..,CK:', 11 ,A1.1:tjt,.::i- 40 rir_s4<y.i.. w'ai..v.s,*•. Snirigz: shs:.11:d t':,•-23 v't,y...•, ,,rif,t,,,tst 1•_.•:: '.:,4t...1 br.if.41.1.1,itit. v-•:4-t7t (lye: . -171.(,...-,,,i• mf,..-- 'i'',k Vk''''''th,'T '110 ,-41:.01 egilr:'1' ..1,"'vv r4vil k TX114. rr.qtal .t..'6'k01.J.I,A5 be x . - th.1.11. 1-,4,-,e.r 1-1v..“ ,.?--:-.•:,.A..,:i•cl ir. attitlioftfzt-c,i,5.1.1 ... tligui:E,T;ei fi.t4- c..L.:J.st.k.- LY1 wv.114:r4 Fz•:','.1',:; 2'e•'.'4:1.4.,XLA• . Wj -. d..C;Y1 :/,.,:,:.,, c.1Ccitlyi:1 tef,`,::',V.• 1;..-2.,, ;.:-... 1.3r4,11., t--7,7., *S.: 3Z-r-,ftt 11-lat-tIr , . •''.•-lu 3;st' 'd1:ta•-ill.Z.W.L•i-4, 4.-.J.I.vi alty .;L•t';•:': T',,,:IS',.-11t, t..L.. TE.7,e!,:i.,..;z"t:3 leL Orl a 4:1 f:: e:.:4'.•...d5;RI ?..i (2:4) 1...:,,,,z: p rci z)61..,,..;.r). _i!il,-.;,,./:.,,ff i..-:'..-; (;1-:- a):41,.. 7..,1' Lad: 1-..!ail': ,..::, I.i.z.'.1 z,..iZ17_:P.-/,....1.."-,11..„9:-,%;.rti,.:,.o. i,•;r ..t.F-...c s,i_1:0: •Ji.11 . - 1c1-4‘1,..`1!, R 1-'•'.i.61-%::5'1'f'l ell: :5.11-1.:•••i'..1:;;;7'-fi: ':',',.;/ 1.1'-^1 ; '':Ei.!.:;;ar:;•;.'.3 6:-.;Y:1;11.3.-.,.-vi.:,,..tr;.. . -..-.,,,,,,-,..-,'•;..,.-z,,-,---.....?.,,,-.,.':7•;"....,-,:-. .-;:;';"1,;4;:-,z'' '.063'.:•••;"•'''''•:••'.•'•:-'-Y.,•-•_-;:'':"..-"' ,. - , ----.. —--,,..R,'"-.1.1='R.'1,q."---i":2- :',';',lei:66'?...Z.',-:.;.---A4'''''.42-;:‘'.7'' ' 's,'•;'.'11.1 "711EV:1437'-'----6.:. „.7 -0.:C.,"'?,'','. 3.'. .4:,`,"; :; -,-f;:";*; .;:. ;';''''; ;I'-'' ..- ''' . '' ' '.--;: -'. .....:'''''::;-, . ''';',,,Y''''.;*::::1,--,:; '-:':' ,L'-t,"7:.;,.,.%'!'-7'.'''''' ''''''.;j1';: i1;ressi,Z.1 IT,Y:;!,t07::4 ;',1:..''',..:j;,'K.,:r;,!:',; ',t';;',1 17;':''::V-;.':,;.'' •' ' ' : ''_:;,';.:';‘;''',1':'''''''SL'I''''"''':'..'t;i4ita:'.' 1-:'247.7,:.;.' L.,-:-!:"';1-61.*•*:','*',7•*'• ---•*':-:••-•' • ' • * . . DonErackon . .. _ . . . L; '.';'-';*• :L;--L.•'•::::'-'•• *"..:7' (*•;.• ',•'•••••,*:•.'•:,'•,,, , -,:::, L. :."• :- . , - .••••.•,,,• ••,•.••i'.'.-:. , , • ‘.- .. , . , • , - • i . . . . ,... . . ,. • •• .•,, •,,, . ., . '. „. .. -. . "L• ' . . -„,.,.•• : :,..tr„',„•,. „';.;',*';''.:*t.q.••,,..?,:,••*-i•y:',',,.*:,,*-.,",---_*:*,'&";;7L:;,:••••1.-..::::‘,“'•L''''':';''•"•-,• . ' • -L ''-. ,L .- ..:: .'; L., ., , - pagevillage Place North- i _ . :2,•_!cl:',,,,;,..--;;;;:•,,:.,..',::,..„ . ',", .-.--...--, .,:=.:',:r.f.`',"N::."---,-;- :-.:-''...''• ' .' ' - ..'., a 1' :- .- ,..-:-:::-,.,::::';':-..".•••'•-':'''-: ••.-':''-:::--"' '-..:?.-'.:.'•-'••,,.. •.„::.'' and eliminate si•.; . •'..- ', . •- -- the ailed for. all,0rpardon • . '.`: . _ . : . . . .'''. :, . ''' • ' ' '; ''' th' -.i&O""the, te. i.i. viii • :At s ounirtut, An.lderuy. -'•-., . -, .• , .'' - '''•••• ' •- -' " •dpla— --____,--- ...d warrant$. I.P••••".,•:eystetzt nYu.st• , impiA.,"„ '',',:,;•''', '. . • ' —-; '. ''. ' 'ilblY'ieduc.t.tory storiP'Pr°Pd:cr:`,1u7g:',...neW:.,-,0011:41drii,11;0"witrelled iliundarnws Fs 4ass: „' ,-. . ., - Poe ,•,,.. . _ of,the.:c(93,1,11.!, 1;17 partially,(..-eaten, --se mist to :Prost...I,wives icf,_,UrfaCe., .„ ,•,,,,,,,,,.,,.....:.,:,:,,,-,,,=, ..." :, ,...,,,.- :-',-- pipe 'COU,P.1.0 the coroP,us*t°res...Y", .1,the,11iT,4n,....T!r7.:,,•,-,.::•-•-• .f.,•••.• ,.-',..f7,,'•-...',,,, ‘,-,r,..,:, : .:•-.,, ',•.-'.,-•t;-:',-":.• ••,-. ' •:.- .,connecte``• 1,t,Iterr,-116- '--;_i____•• , • .aross;;; :',,'.;',.--,--,,,;•,,,,,-,,_;,,,.:•..:':-;,J„..,;T•-:-.,'-.1-:,''.`.,•:',':• ''- ' - -..,. ,' - .--of,,,,,: .,,,,,:;.,...[...,,z-:jr. , ,• .,-:-,-:„. recession:of-•'-- ...,,go' the parking rou • ' :.`.:' '''''::'will c0170;!!17-'1?-r! ____ i;.... ios, iii *Par71°,stoyago..ou ohm, ices,p:,.:, ..._.. . . . iiifeieiii;.:::-.rotkr,r -,46,,_vehlOgar, ,e'Ve,:,..ire,,...cuirently:,,grave -,,-. ii) ' - iefiltaillaa'4c1 ,thuie;.,wilL:13C41 .mv`..,,, b-ititudi-1-..,ereat, that ••• . . ‘-, '''':. 3 AO,efl wire Seat,:. ,15,... „:,:gosilityckial..'"„ 1.1PP.fir .,- !„t.,- •,'..,,;,':-....:. _-,,f- ,;.,••,... ,, .-,. , 5,0w ...y'...s ii,,„.“,- t,,„,,,,,,3,•,..,/!...!--.4..._ .-......,..1, 1 '""'-7-" .' .. ";'-'•'.:. :'-1' '!-;'''l;.:',I COTegetr..,".717.7and..thae ark:Pi urresoilitieg;,?-:4:! :':','., t,»..!:':':0'..`-',4‘.'..:1:.','•,l.':',". ';:A : ' ''''" ' ' ..' , m .'= ati' -lift thel , ,-,..-,'-.-.--,''4!."-6;tr'.`,1,:•,., :-...-• '-''' ...' 4„"mvements forYlltr...-.• .-, ..f i. ...-• . - ' • : ,,,-.-...„,:-.,.. .,•-,oe&n,-- ..-thet wa titr ..,771.. :y...,';57.•,4, -.,e.., ...•'."-.-----,,. ' -'..,,,oh ss ully-- . .. ....,' ;eet 4,,witri, " . . • be tal;1 ,77,kf-,.,,'-',:':.;:i,.•.-';'.'fx„ ..'' '.' ,,'",-, --L-•:_,•?' ffraits,,--:-'-,-'''''''','''weasna;lir_410,-A-7..-:':1 4eperate .••••fa,no.. ,•,„-•,:-.,,,,,,;„.. . - -.• 'i .-'. •• ,. .- .; •,•,..., .. .: •-• ., .„%„,..1,,,v,',,?..4 .•;--..`.,,v,-,: ielii..ithit-404.4',*----7:,-,,bc'oonsiciergu-,;..,"•••,`.,,,,• ,-,c -,•-•:-.-•- •':-•-.., .•••,„'."-, '..,i.::.:•A ...,,.•*;;,, .:. . , • '' . --. L.'' '''''.' L '''Off'llt°-;"•4r ' -"•.: ntiO1:-'-'1h°u1Cg -'&',,"'-' ''•''',•i''Yz.';:,-',.•-••,•••ai,,,,,,-.:' -;•-,••'•,•••••E.,.,-., 's,•,. •.{-:_.7,.•::„.•••..: - :.,,:. • , . ,, - ''' •-- •(4)-1.:-,;:'-'-;AuniretitY :Or'n-qualle.-tYw‘ e° A':piicaS.,j1:2'2;', 17?;r:.:-%:''',.!3$‘: , ?'''.-.1 ':.-...---„......., , i , t• . '.` ' : .• .-:-.. .,, 411-- fora., i:seplzw .:. ,,....,,,,.. .,,,,?;t.';',:il'''',i,,7',4'',':•'-:;:,-..."",:7-;.',,.,'- '_.....)-, :::.'if-,,,,s.,.'.',2. ' ,..,-If you hiye:a , g7,;, geAt. .',. . ,,!.:,,,,..-:-.,,-,,: ',...,',,,:• .,`,'-7-'.2,:'-',':'-',''''I'''''''frr iliCanti' ''..'"".v ', •:',IXteilii014.447.- -- '' . , .' ' ;',..''',',1''.`'.1';'-.'.;;.,:','-'.; '' '''''''''''''..f.'iejilTh';'; ';:::';00'.'''Co'rdingielhe 1LP ', . v."sie'Clill,112,,,a,`:• ,.•:5. ' .•::•''t •. • ...:' ''" ' ':''':.' • "Wo4asunielCI'liiing these.iltialifi0F.Ol9illo'll:Pr-,--- -.. . • . . - cit3611t1 , 'one roger. . . • . . • • . . • . . , ..., . . . . . , • .„ . . . . 9t-010:1MPiP* " • . . ., . ,. ,o, , , ,. . CC. torara also*" - .- . - •: ,'.., ,.....,,,,J,,:•,,,-,2,•,•:- --i - • . , . , . , • , . --.' Gila'Valium.". , . . -,,,,..".. . , , . .. ,:;;:, ' Ign .•'---4." - ."' '". .. L' ' • , . . . r.losull . . • . • , . . . ,. . , . . • • , 1 . . . . ,. . . . , • . . .- . • , . . ... . . - , , . •, , . , . . . . ... • . . • , . . _ . • . ._ • . -'',.'•;, .,..; ',,:',,,;;;,,.*.',...'-,P.,:-'-'':,i,.:,:,,'°-t. jr.,',.',,:''-',.-,-:/:',.' _;',''..-:74Z',:'-'A,,,:',',. • . . , ,.7,•,-:,',,'-' '':..-:;, '''!',1 ,-.J_. : 71-'C. .,,-.',-,.'.' ,;:.',•'::,-.:i!..,-. ..-.'..'",-.. .-;-':-. ;'''..1'..,•'..: ..: . . 0 • • ..- .. . - , .. ., . . , . -.. , . . . ... . ,. . oPsom , ......41.......4.**1*,'-.-•.-' • ' -'.- '.1-.5.::---o.f'.: •-:;'-'i i ,... ':;.;'•.,', <wow few****fivisPol...mraTI.6.0***1.0.• 1,.., ...41. - sioncivirgaWILVA 1 1 11; ''''',•;ir,.. ;..:,-', . am',,..:.-- p... --:-.'• •• ""'"' —'"-—7'us!,--. ;, .- . .,..„ .: ..•-: -:- -',,-,:•;•1.:;','•',..‘•::--,,., ---•••••-?••••-- 7 ItujoN:3„Trid,NCArTIA - 1 2,-... •• . ,„ - - - wimr o",,,,, „_ larnrremloollinimil..."1 • ., , ,..„„ .,,r.,,,,,: ,,,,.„,_,..,,,,_..,,,,,,:, -. •-•,-_,- .......m.m.wmarri• :•.. -• i•;, ‘.:•:-.-,,„:-..".',',,;,•-••:.•:,:'•''.',.:'--'-':-".,. .'".-7.'• ..-7 . •-••••";;..;'''''•-••••:- -or '."•‘.1... 14.418MQ . 1"1.P ..'n'•../ . . I. ..." . •;' .' ' ' ' ••• f '•' .* . '; '•--. -L , ‘L-._ . -.:,, ,...,' . -:- c., - •..... . . ; . .. r:::. - . . - - -.-77-- ,..-.;-."•'•1...-.-..,"•.:7. , ,.- 'IP' • : '',1Z.1" 4:• ,-,',,, •:, : .7):. :,,I, !,:;:,>•-•.•.' •.,,'''::.,.',.. 7 • ',1'. -.-:,• ;•72 .:•.' '• '• " ' '''' . :''''.‘j'i';‘: -. :e:''' :;''' -i I: '-':''::s .. • !-;,,,-,::.. : . '''' • , : , ' •''... '...••.... --17'. 4'4..‘•:.,-;Nil: ..• ' ',..;...'.'1-6;1'..' ::..''.,,1 ".:,....:•!• , ,..„, .....::.:„. . .. .. ....,.... • . $.. r..../ i_ g ., . .../ ,' ,,,... ;,,,,,.,, .. .. ,. •,... -. ._:.-...:-..,.,...-:::: ,;:,:j. 1.1,,...--)-:.,'...'z.::::;:'1,:'": •....1.2,2,,.: 1,3.1,i'"'.;...!...:1.,,,, : :::. 3 ..,„ • . gi -• --,, - I , , ...'-;1;7:.!,'''1,i,.::::.-.).7,',".4-::;:dr:..-•.' :',..--,-t::",-;..',.;!;;,. .it'' •,•'"':,:•--'',:•47..'-- - Si g`.-,11 J7. ''•-•':-.....'-',.. - . .. •/.. . ,....... .,L.-,•-•-:......•..-..,,•;,.-,..;,7,-.;'.• ,,,,,:•'!•;-.4:14•--,•-•,- : ••,_. ,.•IINS' ‘... ',.;7.7 1'2:.,;-“'.,.:,... IP,•-•...„.•-:•,...•,:',7,1--;•-•,-..--•:,..1•:,.7; ' '','''1:-...;:.;'::"..„,•:.;. I • - 7 ' 's i"›, ........."..-' . ''''.77';'-':.:2;•11.•••:-:•-:-/••••`-'7•••'. .;: 'i, ,,-.,;;;,;;:•Vr•-::-.4,'-,,:•:°:',,;,,..&:741.',i ,..a.'::,':'•;;1,::i':'.:--..Vi'-:;'-'7.1.'''.-!7•‘'7'.!•?S':'.-.7;•-':',;'•7:i'2. .r?" ' .:-*..c',..'...;•'' ' ' ' ,. ,,,•.i ;., , ...,; . r.-•7•44. 7...-,•,.... , ............._ ''''''''"-•.-•:4*.'.f,,;•''cj...;.- ":',,, ',':-..-,i,''.--:-.I01'''''-'-:-',.. :/3;•)' 1:::.'';'7;:i;•-'• „: -,--.!•'-' ..• ' '''-,.,...',:.,.!: - -`7:f:•,•••';'.''' : "-- .7-4"---- ... ,„ . ,..,.,..0,..•.;„. -,/- ,•-._- .-...,..,•,,...-„,_:-•••.,.-_-• .-..,...•,..:.-r- . •. • -1.. . • ., 0 . _ $ \ • :. ' . ./i,,,,.),.-7,---,:,' • ••,...„.:•---...,„,,_„,..s..• :,..„i„,...-..:„ ,,,,,,.4 / ./.. ••:..r.:::;,•..,•:-„,:••,-„,„-_,,d,„...,_:„,.. •,-",,,,•!,•,,,,,,,,,,,,,••• ••••,,„.••• , -.----• . • - .-•-•.••1 -•-•• - .----,..` -st-,-' • -.• :,.••.' 7• " -",-.-.711'.....:::.''.•-• ,';77.'.=',1'-'..• '.‘--rm. I:. ....,,,..ii..,,-,:.,.. .:..,,`,••. '..,..;,,.•.'., .,....•.:Ll'., ,•;•'',t; : •-,i6.-''-':4. 4... 4. „, ., ... ' ' ..:1,•,, ,••• :-:,-..........i.,:,,,:„ --.'!-,,.."....,•• .74....4 . ..',,r-•-• :..-ty ",.,•:,••••,;••;••',. --,.7,,,f,-'...7 f';';,-,•:`....,:. z-....,?i-, :.:- 3..,,-.,:::i74`.'i: . , f. L.:L....) '4... • - -'\ ." - -;"•''.---'1'-..' .''''',7'",'-'0.• . '',.''. • •' ' .--71-'''', .'.•;'.. '`..-....i.* :•••4..,,.. .0;2.'Y -... ,,,:',•-,','. .-1.:- • - 6....•,. ... -. • ,. •.. :- -- -,..':..'- b.-.....', ..',•0, 1 .;,•,• • •-.. . 4 . ‘•-.,, .7 "•••-'.7-.1'. '''...:1‘'e-•.•,'.,'7-- .-c;'3:t.'.,..‘," ',',i'-!,'•", ' . '' - '• r.-.......).., ...• i. . ..,.- N ..,•••: ....,-.;',:••;_••;•••,, r•.••.;yr•'::!!. : 7 -- er-f. ..- ••7_,.. •-: ti,,, •, . ,. •::f:••,,,.•, ,-:.-•,•--17•,-,•.,_,:) •:•.F-P.- .. . . . .,-..,•,..._, :• ,?,.• , _:-. .i• - •,_:',;••-., .,,,,,,,.. /r....,•-,:- .•,,,::.,, .:-:,-.•,••••,,,ii!,•‘,.:_: ,, .,••••„,„-,...,;, ,,,f•,..•.•-;-••.,.., ..t... ..::::::•.: . ., __. ..: . • -...., ! -. .),--.,;..... . , ••-•,••••.-7::•-,,-,:-..v; ••,••1 •..,,,,.,..•-•-:• --";•-, •••".. .:,•• .,.,•••: ,',•-‘ '-.7.-...•','F:., •.s.-Pe.,;"-..'..,s,;:•,,,,,, •;.-•,.!.-. Li ,.- . . - t-"-•••..... • ...---...., :-.•,••••••....;.,',_. ••,- -..!,,•-4i-1 ..; ::', ,_.,...-..,, ..•_•:-,.-::•!,••-,, ••.„ .:-,.,:•• • •-•_••• ••••..:-,,.,, .•„,,,,:.••••••.,:;:i.i.,,ci,..., •-,•,..•,.<7.,,, y--,,,..;;;;;;;;..z.....tectisiz. •.,-• • ..,,,-;...-g•: •,-.•••:••i,.//,-••,•:.•-•. •::. •:•••-, .••,,• •.: .•, • •:. • ,,•,% -, • "•"-.1.-- .';!,..tf,'r;,,:1•••':',:' ' . ' -: -' '. ' ' '. • "-............. """..11,,,,.. ./..'''.•.j.7:,''Ail•:;.i 1::•:',i't\ft ;76,...,,:".:;.,,,' ,'-',..., „:,• • .2.-;;; :.,Y,-'4;;;:. ,;,...,,•:...--.1.:.:-. , • ' ' : : : g - :. ,. -':"-- I 11..';,1*'-'''','-. '; - ...-....-••-• .. :`,: ^ .;1::....'....iNY.•-: '-::::-.':;7:.:::.:-',-.„T. . ,;?''•:.451F .,'2:.'"':'';',...',;;;"7-'*-,;•f.4:::;•.;:. 7:' ',-,4:srg;:::;, •.L.-':'-':i. . .• i 1...... ,.., , „. 41k,- '. .. '., -.-,Y,,-,i,,.;.'" . '.i.•:‘ . • -..-....;..- -•.•.-. „• ' ••,7-.'••,-''.i. -'-•..,,'_. ;•,-,.:1:' .'",-•. - i i ' ''.,--.-:';':,••.:'::• !,'':','••:''. ' '-.' ...I:: ....".,;.(..-',$'1_, T.... '• '''..- tit ---„•••• ,,. ••. •;,,...„,„,.'...-...- ..,: ,,,,, . ' •:',- -.` •.•.;,• :--,-,......:',-.--..7-,- ... .•' 1 ........ • * ., .:,-i'.-$1. • . i . . . • • r. 1 : : ''-;''...'''; "", ':c.: ', • it i .;...s. .. .• .- • n' l ,..! iii f, . . . • .- , , .. ••,. , ... • . ' 14.,, :i hi • I, ,.. :. •••,,,•,••• •,,,-.. 1,.,... - .,-.„,s, A ,, • 4/ .; • . It . ,, , ii&h. ,••;,'-. ,..,....--. :..,,..j,...,-...'.-;.c.-I,-, ; :.-.•?.. r.. ' 113.•,- , . . . .. .41MI! 4 • : '- ,. . ' :::'• •..-. •; 7' ''Li?':''.5:-:'.'..`'''''':•11',:-,.;$.......,, .777, "'... ....1 '.."' ,-, ' . . .''.7",_ .i".°%,-,..':: i..2•,.• 7,'.7-:-..';',: ,,,,,:.-.,'.,, *.i,..;• i 1 ,..' , . -. . • - •.•:, ,,,;,-..', ..,,,,'•:.•,;;:p,':•,.••:•,:,,k-i:,:,:r[Li-j;',. i,.,..•1:::::.f.:..?-:•.. „f..3-:',r, .41,1 •.:•,.. a, :...i,:•:•:,•...:::••, „.,•,,,, ,,, •:.:;,:-;:‘..,-;`,::...,,,•;",.... .-7,7: :,,.:.., • -.......,-. r ---.:. .. .•.17;:'' ..' . . ' ....,li'. ''Y '',:r..'..4;';?Lif'''.:'..• .,1..-.'' s ...".7 ,.-; ‘ ..:t' .... .%,..,-'-;.,.• -:'' ,:!:,:VI;,•:-.;',.:..;":fr.'..',..:,` ,"' ',"•'Z'.i . . .•', ' ". , . - .,'' • ',.: ..', • ';,,:''''.,. • ' ' .t..r, ''''" ;.' ..-1-\‘' ..,. . \ • ',,• ,,,. ; •., ,... , •„, 2.,.., .......,,,. ,,...,... - • i ,s e ,j)/ %, ". -V. .'': ''..,., ...•• .ft.. • '' - , . • '14, " • .' N •,`... ..0" • i ''''N • •1 -'.,.:,„.. . ', .,:..• I,-:*".3:'. ..,• -• ' . - $ ft k -- :..* -.'• ' ..', . ''' .4...'411, .1;" .,\•..,0•?,•' ..•••:'. '. -, :...:....7,___,- .' ,...`',-.., ..,•,,g:, .,.. , ..., • - -:„.- ,....r _,,..„,„,:„.„, ,,... .. ..._ ,...... ..p .,,..,• ,,,,,,, ..:...._ . • • . ... .s, . e - ,.. • r ge, • • • . ,.0.;. ,‘ .M..,f; ....,;,,,.,,,,,,,:,.%.,;,, -• .....:,,. . . .::::•;,,.:!,•:.;-....7:"Ftly,,.. •.'t•-•':". .::-'7 . .,..:-.,•,.,-.•;,:::. :-..,,.,,,-• . .. I,- '-'• 0 ,q wiiiiii/fi l• rr I ' ' • •. .'1.I 1 if ;-'"II IF I 1°'t IPAI\\\\‘10" t,,:''';'Z'7...I.:I I '''''';'-'''1'.--'''''' '' -; g'-': .- ''' IC '' .; ,T.,1 ' ..'• ' ''.'•••• . i! •. )11:0, ,ert:, ....--c i...-..--_. . . • , ., ... . —I• .....:. ,: iir;p3x1- , •• ,-!.-...---.......,,.-. , ..,.• , ,. ,. ;! 1 II ... . i . . . . . . - -.1t i - 7•t , i . • _ , .... : t .4........, ; ......,... :, . It .- I; . • , ...... . i : i. t . i / ‘..,1 • / rb... ., . , i 1 , '• i . . I i • I • i i —6 - . 4-.. i i .. , ef 1 r .;,k i •, .,......• • • 0 .... ..... if % . ;r 4 1 ,i. ,r•t ....••••4,i . - / / Ii : I t .•it!..0 : Z t / I II I, ... .1 11'.74.41 c•in, 1:.'d 4 1 . : •f 4 1--- I - •-. 1 I . -.;iY1, 1 144. 1..::!. . . / I;C • i I „, - . •• . ...• r -; 0 ; t g i ' ,' • f illt ..— ... . • 1 ....:..'.."-_14 . e• i...„.....--- ____ p.v/Ii ‘•••,..3.44.%%$, + .••• 4: 1,./..• ,-.1 . . ___—..4-• ...• N N . P .....d ... '.. .-.• ,,„,....,.... ..sui... 1111,11111ill • - EEESEEMIE giiiii ii I — • I . L008 g2E 903 60:01 . TG/ST/20 ncici .cjcc,x r !E!:" _�'�' IF, . 1 . a i —... ...... .i . V.. 1 li I i 1 7 04 pelt-. 1, 7 i.2/, 7 •-• • .... , •,,•• .- a- - 'Its--f. t.' • J 11 i . . .• ,.. ....,. ..: . ..., , . .. •. lit 1 !I- .,. .. , , . . .. .,. ..... . . " :,. ..• . 101 `-.�- i, •. .• -. , III i lit iel i • • .� .,:-.:,-.,.Nev . .-„� - • f 1• t- It "•----- • '�..1�• / 1.,•, c.. ~ is"x-":iiii . ■ ,I.; ..i.,-: • :-,..,:••-•••• .•-•:,..,•,,.i. ,••••••,..-,;.1 1.„ i••••f!..„'?,,,•!„,:, ---......„.• . , ,..„.......,,..--_....,•:, — , ---.. .; - . , ,...ir,,......,: ., ............. ... • • .A:, ✓:,' :; .to .w - i. Y. -•„' i i' • . • ' i` .?' ,- \•. , •, , ^ • 1 .. \ / J •Y • 1 • :.• % , -,:-I-vr.„,„ •''''' ,.•4:•-p.:. ..- • :-: I; . . - --=4-_,..z-L.,...,,ft • •••• . . 4 .,, • . , .. , .,�� fli,, !1 111� •,it ,, ' . . - -. , ,,-• ,, . . : . .. .. 1 4 / .61 ILIA ir..:IN\AN'7.."'e''..t'''''-';%1"d '1..If -.: - • '• .1 :r.. 8'. iftp . ' .' 11[11.ry:1 ._•.. ic.i t 1 .,' -1. . mot•+ • r f r ii 1 N1 1:4 I :.,:.11..‘o- .,1. r, ,,,,-;_,, .'...""- :.o aj 1' ,. :. .. _ 1� ..1, ; ;i - • . ,Irk 01. a% c j I••ri i ,h i i iik k it.. __ ... . ..• .... ..... a :; LT ;L;; - �r ....-,„\-,t,, 31EEEEEBBOE ',WHIT _ Irwin�— sad £rSq £SSZ-S£Z- - ON "L31 NOII4 . £LI7 :d* t' :01 ie.-cI-?•k1J , -- __� ..-.—. ,-,•-,� rn.r,r •rr irT/r1A • ' •03/15Y91 08:52 �"``; ,y aC SEATTLE 002 4 1 • August 8,1990 Callison ; Village Placa North Architecture Area and Parking Calculations • Programming • Planning Interior Design crai'I,+a 1. AREA OF BUILDING aldng.Gress Oft Gross Net Office• Core Ret. Gross Eft. Floor 10 28,171 29.171 25239 2832 89.9% floors 2-9 (8)30.219 (8)30219 18)27.387 (8)2832 90.6% • Floor 1 35,360 20214 15S28 4286 15.144 78.5% Total 305283 293,137 230,363 23.774 _ 15,144 89.7% 2. PARKING A. Office 1302 cars 5 cars 260,363 net sr = 1000 net sP' (or gross leasable) REQUIRED: PROVIDED: 1302 cars 1302 cars ('ii 04 .12-0119-a) 521 compacts(max.) 359 compacts -(, B. Retail 15,144 new building 11,100 new infill 4,100 Schumsky's 1,804 vacant 15,000 Tradewell 20,000 Pay N Save 27.000 Ernst • - • net sr, _ - . 466 cats 5.5 cars 84,751 net sf" = 1000 net sf' REQUIRED: PROVIDED: 466 cars 466 cars 140 compacts(max.) 125 compacts • *net sf='Gross Leasable.' 1420 Filth Avenue Suite 2400 Seattle.Washington 98101 (206)623-4646 FAX:(206)623-462S J. I MI Di KINC4 COUNTY, WASHINGTON, SURFACE WATER DBSION MANUAL Detention r$oiltties There are two main types of detention facilities: ponds;and, tanks or vaults. 'fate method, of aradysls and design standards for detention fao8ltles cart be found In Section 4.4 In Cnaptsr 4. Pastor C ty: The design volume of detention Wattles used to meet the standard peak rate runoff oohtrot performance curve for the 2-and to-year, 24-Hour duration datgn storm event*OW be Inorsased by a 30 percent factor of safety. This requirement shaft be met by Incrnnsing proportionally by 30 percent tree design detention volume bstwr n each I loot of storage depth without noreaalnp tie total depth of storage or altering the design central oilier/weir sizing. Detention PorKtg Detention ponds are the moll desirable alternative for detention facilities for water quality benefits. relativa ease of inspection and soots for malntenanoe. ling County encourages the design of multi-purpose detention ponds which can serve the multiple r es of reorvatlon (such as playgrounds or picnic areas), wildlife habitat (wetlands areas) and as co gandscaping to provide for a natural appearance). Multi-purpose ponds must meet all the requirements of the purposes they ars required to perform. In mufti-purpose ponds Incorporating recreational feat*, the recreational faOYtcles must be designed in a manner compatible with.the storm water functions and matntsn noo standards. Detention ponds may combine the p eiformanoa requirements of wetponds (see Spooks! Requirement ,MO and 6ection 441.2 In Chapter 4). peters TItnka and Vaults; Detention tanks and vaults are underground facilities for the storage of surface water. Tanks are typically constructed from 00rrugS ed pipe and vaults are constructed from reinforced concrete. Tanks and vaults provide loss water quality benefit (bioflltratlon and biologic activity)than ponds,therefore, blofikration measures ars especially important, Pilate Pf/rrklryg Lot Pc nd$nrl: Private parking lots may be used to provide additional peak rate runoff control detention volume for the post-developed peak rates of runoff for design storms greater than the :. to-year,24-hour tluiatlon design storm provided that: (1) the depth of water detained can not excise 1.0 feet at any location in the parking lot; and (2) the minimum gradient of the parking lot area subject to pending shall be 1 percent; and (3) the emergency overflow path meets the earns requirements as for infiltration systems. root Pending: Ponding of roofs of structures will be allowed to be used for peak rate runoff control detention volume provided that: I1) the depth of water ponded can not exceed 1.0 feet at any location on the roof; and (2) the minimum pitch of the roof area subject to pending shall be 1/4 Inch to 1 fc ot: and (a) the roof support structure la analyzed by a etruvtural engineer to adarees the weight of the ponded water; and (4) the roof area subject to ponding Is water-proofed with a method with a minimum wooed service Ike of 30 years. Retention Facilities There are two baelo typos of retention Nullities: ponds and clod depressions, Retention panda are constructed by a combination of excavation and/or se berming. Closed depressions may be established as retention faciiities, and in some cases enlarged to a0oommodets additional surface and stormwater runoff by excavation and/or berming. 1.23.3 1/90 PROJECT IMPACTS AND MITIGATING MEASURES City of Renton Standards The City of Renton policy for traffic mitigation is set forth in.a memo that is dis- tributed by the traffic division. For intersections,the policy states: 'The developer is expected to rnnintaln with their development the same level of ser- vice that would be anticipated in the horizon year if the site were not developed. (Unless the horizon year level of service is at C or above.)" The Village Place North project does not meet the c ity's threshold requirements for intersection mitigation; however.the project proponent will be providing three significant mitigating measures to reduce the effects of project generated traffic on the street system. The first is a transportation management plan( MP).the second is a contribution to area- wide improvements in the S Grady Way transportation benefit district(IBD). and the third includes improvements to the S Grady Way/Lake Avenue S intersection. Transportation Management Plan The nature of traffic generated by office projects lends them to successful transportation management plans(IMPs)• Currently.three office bnttrtings on the Renton Village campus are occupied by Boeing. One Renton Place.Two Renton Place,and Three Renton Place. Successful TMPs are operated at these offices which consistently result in a 15 percent rideshare. Since Boeing will occupy the Village Place North building.it is suggested that a similar TMP be developed for the office portion of the project. S Grady Way Transportation Benefit District The City of Renton has implemented a plan to collect pro-rata contributions from new developments to fund areawide improvements in the S Grady Way TBD. The contribu- tions are based on the type of development and the number of daily trips it is estimated 89463.01 The TRANSPO Group,Inc. Page 17 •-'•. ;-- . • . . . . . . . • , . . • . . . . . - - • . . . , . , . . . • . • . . ., . • :ThiREE RENTON. TWO RENTON - OM RENTON ' -_. %/WOE Pl.?10NONIN: _EMIR i ..1,3_pacia*OW EVERawebi BUtP.ING i , • . ..,.....,.. . • • • - •. • ' • . . Mat MVO • . . . . . ......-- . ( . ... ... .. i fit.:••: qpi• . . .. " • • 157 . • • ••:•-:•;,-'..f..' .C• . .:4•.,...?.`•:-. : . -•• . al • ' • .-.',4:; • -„,.1 ;'. •:,. ,.:;:i.:.4.i.;.:;.....,.;;'..r.-qK,.,.-:.1,,,.:4,... ..':-''''..-•,--.;:.:;'4.:..,-::f..:-:-.1. --..,.. • ' • . . .. :ZW I • _.. ?a . - •-.....4ii r ... :...-,*4; • •• • =mai. . .. .' ' ; . t• '':.f. ". •• •7'2,7,,Y,T-A . -I .•:If.--.. .• ,%:i•;•:!. r.' 241 ..,:••••"/2.•: .• .y. -• .Y6::::-•,t,•L• '' 'C'' -.'•• ..r-'-•-- . . - • r'•'. ''''•!a .Maw=MN MAI WA MIL . . . ..1 ' ILL.-1 .. . ' • • .>• . . . . Mee•16W- . • . ' _. • . . i • . . _..._ . • . . L'VL i •.L.,/ VILLAGELRAMN=1.._._....._ .. sanuom ,..:„., a'07'. • • • . . .. • •,.....-,..ioqi-4867.04 • • , . -54,al-e,78—96 • . • . •. ' Sesk Lev•el. aleuGuitG,s • • • .. . • . . . . . • . • • , . , . . • . , . . . . . . . . , . • . . . . . . . . . . • • . . . . - • . , . . ... • , - . • . . . . . ... -• . , . . . _ . . . . . . • , .. • - iii,;`,,'.:.'c.'''',...1,!:',1, • • '..,i'. '• •-t. ''''f,'.-tr"'t-".7 '''' '• • •.' s ,•••^ ,1-1,4.,;.1.-.'1,'--•,,,;',:;:e. • '":.• : ' 7Itti..:?...1' .X:'''.'?."' .,P-4,1..;',.:,••-.'•••••---'. ' ',.f• /,!..--•:'..'"`'. . ,,....7-.:,?-',. '..--;...,;::.;.;5t.;.:!0;,;':;,!:•;;.-4i:l..1•.-11;;!•?' :-...--.•<:,.;-• \ • . .....,...,...• • .„..,:•-•:,;,;7,•,!.,:j .• L.i,'.)V •..•'f•. • " "• •;..•.:,1,,.i1.,,.!•.'C•:..Y4,.'-'4-.7:.1..A:..•.-C:: : C •4.!t.',?T•!':1 IV..,,q1.71.Zi:r,'...5..••,:470'.r/. ',.,,-4•V,',2"i,,'4,.e,t•,•--•I.;f/.1'7.-..:.'::.,7',,,.-t,'•••,':'• •-•":",••••'t •,d•...<7' • • '-‘•'.• ;-:•:-0 .. I •.•;.;:.!...t. '14.: .• . • V•t7.•':',...;••;41."'.1'r.i7-'.i..-.,::.,,..."•A,--Zu'ei.7,, ',..;%";,•',4`,7.2.,-;..• • . rel'....f•••••.7,•!.1'. .'• ;:;.•''..7'3.1,17"P;7,:f."••;:,,..:.".'1:1••••-.--;'•-S,P..:7'.7...i.: . •;7,.....; .S;j! A'•.• .!:.qt '.,••••'..4..;•:,-,9 :!.!,1::•.•-••?.....f,.....,..;:si ••-!,••••,,:z.,,,P.• • . ••••• - P.' ..,-.1••••...1-:•,•-,..;:,....,-,,, .,.... --*_•.,...---•••. * ....: d'i::?..;•7?.A .t.t.•,•• •••:.••`•••••• :• !..••• .1. • • , . ...,; :1,-. ?iiC--- r•-'.,'-•.•:.!,..,'.'•. '."11-..••. . ' ...,•',,•.•.,•••-•,.....:::11.;.'.•"'-4.,4;4'1„w•4-1:•;i1a.1t,."{k-i 1•.1"ki,,„i•1,;4L•,','1:,•,,.:.,1:,,,.:,E:..;'.:...:'-,,-.-,...t-...;.?,..?,..-1.1,.,1 h1...':..:!,."',.,.-•.,,,.:.,.",.-.-,.,,.:•.:i•-',:-!•'.1f-...:.-..!',1•:•',".A:-,',.•,,'''.,J,'sr1F.,',,i,'i,,,.•.4,:'A•:.•;.•.:',"•.„,,.:••.'a,-•,:,::;..'-•,.„.;;q-,:2!'.,1/2'f`:.•.,.,.:•.,'.:,S . 04.P4',,:..'..,'.'•.:, . ,..•,..,.,.•-':••,..:.•,..::,..•N-;•:•-,•.•:••:,.?•'.,,::•,,•••:,,•.,•::•.•-.s:.,..•.. .-.,:,.••.•;.•::- •:,•‘.,--,.•'•••:•••'.,.,':•. -.•.-;.•':•••.••.•••,•.'.:.•,,,•..,-.'.....• .-.••, •-•- • . ....• ,, •••,-4;7:).. :'•:•...,•-•/:-;',,,,....,7,,,:-.;',1•A',...,;(.r.•,,,-;:' .... •.•• •'. ,': '•.. • ',•'.•'.•::,;',•,,,l'•f',;'., '-'1'3'.'1;''.i.'.',,c1.1,;?,:';''':4*:-Ici• il':•;f:';,•:.--;,',.:',•:•::-.•''.;:•'' :- - . 1., ..:* .;:,: ;N:lf!'I•• 39, 1..)./ 041?,i2g-t1F9,,..,';'i'.,.::a:;:•17:.•!, •,:•••.''.'.. ''' - • !••;,'•1 ••-.ii?-1 ;id 1:i'.'1 •.:rA.,;:14.0:.?". •-,,,,,.,',4',.."-:"".'''. .-- ,.. .* . .':' ":':f!",t,-0,•-m•--,-,?4,11. •••,*,...„00e,,,,,. .;:..1,,:•••..,,,...•••• ....• ..• . .•••,••••••,...s.t...'4•,;,..i:::t;i1,t; z.1.•-, ,,,,'"}-r,P2-=,fk-:•...i4):':&s,',,,,V.,7::::N;. •;,t.:i'',"?-'''..-''.• '...". : '';'''',i.IA je..', :1'...A.I.' •'::'.' ,''P51.4t4aa.:1',r.';'.P.,..i.:-';.;. .:- ,:,:'.'.' '..-...: . . .,:,...,•-:;,.,:,-.4., ,-.43 i.....,i,.,''.i :ilM„K17.7aV.4,1''':14','4,. .--:.......,';'.-•-p...,':--, ....•,l'''..;1.,; gi.:....• :'.:,-;-.C.:.•;.,.,"3'..',.,.f.Mc.i'f?.:::';‘,.1:..):,••••:::..,.- . . . . , - :.:„.....;:.:,,-•,i..:::,,,A-11,,.;i:,;-,.,:-.- it.•.,,. 4R-•,•:4,,....,41.egig',:rf•-,!..b.°1::':-:,. -1C'>- ', ' •:' ....:'il''i h"it,-Vq".:1.'; it- ''• .4.f.t..er,,,,,-. .-...,.....,.. . .. . •., , '., 0..v.2 il te..-.§1,••,-.. ,t 0, .w,lAttlg:,.--r...W,.••:.:•.;,,P..,•:•J::-;:•:•.-.:-.::'.. , '''.....i.:-:'flI'.1.1 i 0 It.M.•:-,: :',- 00,1';"OA. •.',i;•,,a',.....ii.{-i5:),,...,..:!:•1!:.1.,,; .•:,1.;.-.-..2.„, .i .. ---.:.:I.,I‘151:i!ill - sj til :':' :i1i7,!1•1.'*2",,,z'ik-,11...t,:4,a;v :',?.7,-,:;••.::-::-. I .,..-!....,.,.,4......4,...t tii;.:, .-P. 4;,,,,.t..1-..--.,,e,.ov.c‘,,K..-..,...t,4•-•..,,,,,4•.::• •-:•-•:: •,•••••:•:. :-.- ' ...1 . ,.,-..e).e:t'..;-..4tt•i•.'1•4i,i'S-It<t:3..A1..,;:ttaff,t,(404:- ;'23.-•:'..i.?:4,;:•:2.!. .;;•: :??3.•:•••-.. -,-.z), !:;•::,---, . ....r.,,,,,-,,:,,,,---•••----- - — • • : - .,....,.--,v--....t5 ..,„;,tto...,..,,:pk.,.•,,,,y:,:.•41.,f,„,,,- , .: ,,..,) ...,•••:,,.,..,,4...,,,A,3,...,,,,4''., ...1.....1.1..:.4:4•4;iii',,.V..1,.‘01,et.'s it • ;; •• .: i .6% '. • • •lb, o •, ..4,2r.,-.,-.I.4.t- v. ..--. ,t •••• . ... ...„ • ,..,.-•,.,r.t.m.,,rw.trzit.1.±._-74177i '''' •14.1-i • \li ' •,.„ '' :• 4:.i.'1'.111,•:4 v.‘4L, ,;,11.1?‘)A • . 41 ..• • . ' - „,,;..,i,. 'IL:-.-7: ist.7;,i,,,,t,,, i 41,V; . 1 •• . -•,..,••• '1•,,i •'..q.2.%'•-il.:, 1 1 1'?../3 i!:t''."" " tE 1:•-:", . :*.!,•••.•• . . '•14'::••1•.P'4.i..?.--/Eli',.•.:.••.,.:•-.•‘;?1,• .*!.ji. ;.1 ii';;;.i 1 iii t•1,1 i 4-,...;:•-•:.--,::-•.,....:. 'N z::.sir•::.0....r.,.''...::.;I'lv:r i.i..4 !1 q 1 il I t A '''--,:-..tl',;:'.2.-.1'... .f.;:i*?:.3.::4'..1:::7:.1';:i1:.•::,....:1:A:;.%,':1:•.1.:,..1 ,.,ifi 11,4'Nil..i!1 M 1.', . '-::-..-- .'-x *. -..';0' ---,i141';/:•ti 17.is'.',1 ii it p t I ,,.;:, •,,. • ....,•,..„ .„„.,,..1, ••k5 0,li... „:..s..., ;,-, :,.,.I ,;, if,•,,, ; ;...,. ii7..tr • • 1 '.1.:.•'''•-• -41,-•II, .1.f. 1.1 .: ".."'":..1 C.;12.4`...1 T t.'::. ti is ? '(-.:.,% 2..1'.::1,' . .1.a!,..%.'• ,7. .ei,... 11. ' - :;.1.• ',..:.•.'4*it.:if ?. 1...k} 4:\ ft•,'.;''. '••'••i•,", j, ..1,:`,',:Pri.:.1....V ....It!.4'..1, \.••••t. 0_ i,..•!.:,-:::i.„••.. '. .......!;::.•,••••.•:!,.".v. ...4.4.1:41-1•1.•••?'••••!,:(; ‘.1 i'. ',.',4\ i•.'1';'•:•;'..,r•,,,t1 -'..:.,..,•,..,, ;,,1 •:::.1.'f*;..4,- ..:',:!,'... :.: :.••••-• t..-.., ., 1 •,;=i..i.iA .. ,...4410!',",',IT:,'' ,L1 , . ., Afuti...r.riLis,,,':„,..,;:l. ,:.1. v. : .:. • - ..".1"-.. I L'.01-':1':1),!.F:c.Vfler' ' 'n:nr", , .,P',-,.;--- k,,.,•••!•'. , — . t.111411',`,:a.eli.',;,,r*-4.2.1,/t.:,:*':',,,e:0.',-../''' •'''' -. '.1.-1... ,, .l'"i's .1, .'-''."-11114:'',IN,II;;.1. i';..ti:4,ri!,..tii•-",,,,: . I. •••:,.i •1‘,-..,,,; : ;..;':1:?, -.,,,..41-.:.,[4,,,..--=?,;.‹.:r--..i.-:1 r., ....::: 1;1-1' r1;;,:,::11,, .)•zlAiij leg.:......fr'.; ,:;:v.7..:::?-.-...--,: .. • •. ... V "'". • -..- , . .--...,..„......... . . .:1 '',''.;1*.lf'''-i?.."iik:F. •. !°•11!.....''...; ••••;:',::.^ -....77."."--".-•:,--.. ... • ... .1,1f .,if;i ti,,A%, .,',^ rf.1; ',,,..' .;:-...:":".•',.',Iii•!: .,;7'''',1*.-..../... .:-.'...-•-•• -,-- • ...:. • , I. f,d, 1 i , ,..,:::- is,. ,-,.1,;.:';,..;ii.?:.,i-r -- _:. gi.-. t., a,..j•',.;7,-3-s r..‘••••••.1.-',•-. .7.7.„.:,;;;;2$ .,..- ', , :'-'•., . . IIIi• ..' (.177- ? '' E` . 4 I..-t.:,..,?::•2''':i• . -.-_,....... ....ff... -.......:1-.. . . i - . • ti .,4 . .,;,,,,.... .,.tr.-.7ii.,.... 77:7:•.4".'•.,.., ...f:' . • ;'.!'. .TY,"1917,1-,... 17,:.:71,," 4:1,'•2:i;:;:"-.i,•,i„.',;:, ,:‘,. ';;A,' :;•,:?'..','....:, ..•• . . *./..;',-•-•••'•';-",.-- -:'. 41 0"•••?'ir••••••:••P':;••••"''''.'4,:i.5v--if---•- ••••••-••••-,'• •••.: ..--------' . . twi ,t-.,....1.6tf% a:--" ..• •,--:.:... - -..,•::,..-fl:fritt-ir:i.,-,••-47.. ---,-..- •-,,,•••••.-., ,,V.,,,i.... •---AA 4, xli,tc.t:q.......-1-.. ,i-,...- :-.,•-.,---1-.,..,i1:-,..,---- ------ --c--- .. . 4:1 -.-`..: •11' .' - ..''''":',''-%\';•-', '''`--,:q:.V;;,,z_._.',-': •-•=-:•'",:'''. ----7-t-- :.•-.•-..•-f.'...': "Plik.-7,."----,...,- ,-.:- ,-;1•;•, -,•:*,,,Hp ,L-1,t4•.(. .k, A ,., . -:•'"- --:'..- -::'"i-'.--'.:.,;-.- . l',.V.- ' .."4 ••• 44,1 14 . --. .,.... ..‘..:::-,.; :,.:.,. ,,. .. .,z,...1-4i.,..:' ,.:::"•'•-,..• ---- ,„14,V.,',:e..., ‘..-4-lit ./.1,• ., .--•:- , t....,..- •ri. - ,,, ,",4-3,-.. ..!. . :',;' ,"•.. . . . "*...• Vi.,;',1•;. ••,11, ,A.,, • - -. „ 1 t-,. . s. .1 ,'•-. - ,:.:;,..... • . - 17' " '' ,I. .ii, i., ,1,i'Lr; i,,i. .: •..:Fifi- "'''' ' . ' ' n 1:- ' i, .,',1'•;,...,,, -.,:-• .,,I.!iLl..-',5::-.::•:.,....-..!/,:'••••...----:-. '.i.•;:;.2•„,,,.... - : .. .eil,•., \ 1 4 1 ..,-,. ,...- i .,,,,,g,,. .- '..f:v.c,-:.,.-4.ff.,3,:s. 4,--. u th.)...,.• F.1... ...--.. '..il :t.i..., ,;: ''.:A-1..?.i...i:,.".:,. ....•. ''..,:1:**,.,:.'„,..,F.'.. -, ... •. .' ''',.... .' '' '-1 ' ''N V, " .:,-; .,..t.**..04..-:.1.,. ,,,,,,,.:,;-,,,,,. ..,.,fi.,.,....,;.,..1 .. . • ii:-.11''. 415* 4 . . ti..0. .".. ?...1 -.-ci ,.... :,,••..-,.ii...,:.!,...„:,..,,.....,,,,,,1,-..,3?,......:;,:. ...e.,,..„ i . . ,...i.,•:i.;:..... •-••• .,, , ..,.. ; ,,,,. I. ...q. 7.;.,4;,-$••:!-.,,;..... . ...„,. .r,./-4.,','", 0.-`..'. 707/0i•D' ''cifie4 •!•,-, 's% '',. Vi,'::':.i.t.i!;,, .:•:;..::•!- ..,,,-...,„'1.,,,aX7;:t.?..,::...,.1 . ,''''''', 1 .; .4, 41- t• .,:'!' 'i,';a '47c fl‘4 '11 '''.''''.;:.l'i‘\.4.'....,'...';''',.."•::...:'.:{i....7...1.,7k., ":.:......;\ , 1 -'`rt., '''....:T: N 1 c.''. .4I ..', iir,;" ;A til iy1 il,1. , lt.g... ;........:,:' ..,:.-: -...;.'..ii:3;: ';-,--;'..,'-:•,:',.'f.--.'-. WI •,,.,,`-.1 kW.v.nr _vt• Y-k,. U.. a, ‘. - • ' \ 1.''':'''":591 '6''' tii 1 I RI At:.•x:,, ,..,4-MAill'i,i . -..il a . .. ,,,,,,4.0.,,,,.,,,,,,,,,*.563„..,:, . . ,I.:.,,.. Zinff"'f'Y'•'&.' "• ',.2.F.•4 .t.'.a.;_,._..-4.....it-..: %"'2.:...',........1:........:'..,:•-•—••""•-:!-'-f`:-.7'''''',',..—n:',•777: II I • • _ . . . . ......„..„:',....;-4-,....,,!--.!•:,••".••;;::... ...i....?..;,.. -.V.',..';...--'' i \t , . • .• ''i. l',-.1171/• ,•;/',1:.:i7lAg414"-` 1.': '.' '. 9 IP i liii 1 !fi.,.,P.„,, . •.• ,.... .-7.....,,,•„,t.pt5,.,„„.,„\,.., , ,,.: o ,i igt :' '''Jg.•.:1-j3 II qi i, i A .4,Phi/ ;.• h. .%!'';?...''''•:-',V4'ff."...'"./'' ' `., l' rt,_r ...?• 1. 1...7 "Nil D. 0, '1",9, .......?../,''',"!..,-* ,,,,,;," ,,,,/"..0 ''''''•"--''''''''':".•:-' . NI—.‘ :,. N gits .., • 'f• ini.l, 01; ig if.,, ,,,.:,. irakv,,, ,.:45?-,!.:-A:Ki;,...:;: ,s. •- .. ..., ,14',. K;o‘tl. •...„,..•.•',:: , •••0 - -- • ...... .,.- ,,,,Tig-A0,-.....— ;47-,--..orgt.„,i,-:,;.:,:ir,';',:•'":I::'Li) ' •->"qi ;.4. ., . .. . ' •.;.,..al,,,,..•'..•*!..,...1/0-‘...,..to..;;;.,..,...,:,-7-4,07%. ..,•-e-c:/•• ..,C7,•n,;7!,;:','?'F V• \ ;,.:7' ',i."' ,,, • rt '.,i 41," ,, ---"- 'At. . • .•/...7: •-••rer,r- _, . . •4..•- - ./ 6 • . 6-. 46 CIS OF RENTON sal/ `"~. Planning/Building/Public Works Department Earl Clymer, Mayor Lynn Guttman,Administrator April 9, 1991 Loren Laskow Renton Village Management Corporation Evergreen Building,Suite#509 15 South Grady Way Renton,Washington 98055 RE: Village Place North (SA 078-90) • Dear Mr. Laskow: This letter is written in response to your request for information concerning the"hold harmless"agreement that you are required to provide to address damage to life and/or property which could occur from flooding on the above-referenced project site. Under a policy developed by the Public Works Department and the Environmental Review Committee in 1989,the City requires such an agreement(to be implemented prior to issuance of site preparation/building permits)for each development located in the City's identified flood plain as a precaution against potential flooding damage. Examples of projects required to provide such agreements would include Blume Distribution(SA 112-89), Southgate Plaza(SA 068-90), Rivertech I and Rivertech II (129-89),Alaska Distributors(128-89), GSA/FAA(SA 030-89), East Valley Office Park(SA 118-89),and Sheets Unlimited (SA 039-90). This agreement is necessary so that the City may authorize development in areas where there is a potential for flooding to occur. The document is required as a supplement to the installation of water management systems (such as compensatory storage) because of the dynamic nature of the flood plain. If you would like to have further information, please contact me at 235-2550. Sincerely,4...4an Lenora Blauman Project Manager • 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055. RE: Flood Pictures The enclosed pictures were taken in January of 1990 by a Boeing helicopter. The pictures are numbered on the back. #1 Three Renton Place in the foreground, Two Renton Place in the background. Flooding is visible on the Puget Power property, which is flooding Talbot Road and the parking lot between the two buildings. The water is flowing left to right. #2 The Shopping Center is, in the center, One Renton Place and the theater in the background. The water again flows left to right around the shopping center flooding the lot and Grady Way. #3 The Ernst store is in the center of this photo, One Renton Place on the left and the Pay 'n Save store lower right corner. The Cinema is in the background,. , the manhole by Ernst, where the 72-inch line goes into a 48 inch can be seen blowing water out - but is basically flooding only the surrounding area. The roading near the theater is flooded by a drain -backing up from the 48 inch line. #4 Another picture of parking lot at Two Renton Place. #5 & 6 Another picture of parking lot. _ ! ` � T[ . 4. . . ,.....,- - ippronftik, ....... ' :. .„,, . i ,, __. !; �, �. V.x.• _ • . . \i/11' I / ..,,, ■ �,d ' 'i,l F,. r l] r f ..- y `o"';'4)1�5 •� 1" I I 1 • �1 - !��14 -�c p r --. NO 4 . ) M ' LI '11:', k AA., \ a 17 .I. ' 1 yJi`- N ' i . - \il ,6:.•-— t'i,, , lilir ,ri a ", � ii F l - , dJ1 i",. is • _ 0„. Ali vtivy ,--. 1 ll. 1\:!p?:?1 Via'.:. •gv, isi. , ,, _ 1,,. ii fi-illp.ir ,, i a:sn .P .1'i'fi St . 1. 'I'' ' .I . I f ' t.: i 0 .A. ' 1 fa 1 . . Si . \\\\ fo ! . ),, ill'il a, t ..)1/ *.TI j , . It . . . - . . 4S.• .....-- • if? i_ .,•,• • , 111..1 t..-. Vol Eel I I •1' 1111. 1 11.41Tg i . \\\\\I ' 1 ;• le -t !:, I r 4 , • ii • , , I ' Illir 1 tj ' LI IA11111,00 i 1 .'jl , ' 4 V'P' 1 L 1 11'4•1 . if V. .yt ; 441 , . t „A . m.. . . rt ' I ;.1' „ ' • i 4 lk;11111111) vostallIsell It 1 i ilk 1 i A' '' • • ' tV;f1 I ' . • ' .6 tt, 1 i tic 1 ii• -,1 , I • # ,‘:-. Itcp:or, J.. i , , iroi. . ,, it; • , : , ...., , i At 7-fil ltiti ' . .1;k•CIIP!. '', '.)' .- I -4 ' - -kY t. '• ' I ' ir Ir `k1T7i'l 1 ' i .4i. gs- _ !.. • I, ' $ .-- A . t4; 3 41 ,,kil —,.: ‘:ti;..4 ' ? :: II * i . A ... • if' ' ; ,, 1 l'i _,...t. . . • , ' 1 • t Y 1 , •$il i •,, - i, : .,. , 0, 442,A " • 4 I ' 41 ' * , . F. , t . •. . 10 .. •• t - \. • 4 -... . .. ,4- ; ill" ; •_!, ' • ... •t o- 'it• 1 II: . : • ------- 0 0 if . .4- / . .. . A . • .. t sc, 1 ' ; t A' ' 's i . t .i. I •,'- ' ;4 ' . - 3 11- . „ . , ::./',,,, ''' irit ,ii i I it 1 .; ill ••• il. III , , - . t ii 4 .t. * l'i , ,f .- ii 4 At , 4 t ,.... ' , . Pt i • 0 i , • • , 1 !,/ - -. . • ...- ,.. . . ''...70 ,i -1; _._. _ • . t 7- iv_ i i • , , otik ik .i ' _ •,..,N* I, ii. iki------, i ' If i ,, itillt A(. it fi, e h • ------ lit i fitir g - - .... e . ,' NI.'"A• • \IIii4 lb ___---) , As ....... t ,.., • . • ..,. , , \ , sk---) yi.6., .. .. i.„ wii • h ,.t .,*•••-. .... . ' A4L,I. ._ • 4, . : . .. .„. - , • 417T-- , - 4- v . . :.,,, _ . 14's It --.44 .. 101- `-, --• :' : . , ...... - it Ilit ' 1 .. ., 1 .!', t. At toy .„) + ...0 • Ir . all 1 • to ,• .--•••...\i''I ( 1 / . • ) I t . CO 1,4, -- . a . ) 141111 iiria_. /*/ 4? dh . . . r'Mil 4 illi ima.....tie i , , 1 i - • • ti i • ,- • . t s f -- . If is • 1 , - I Li, • 1. 8464 if • .- i Z lit; . , ___grike jai • 4 , I ff . \ j lois _ ' lLi • Sim , --- IS .,, II il - foto • i . ' f t ***- _ ,_•eri 7:11 •lik 4 • I he k....1C4 __I 6,_illi - —_ „.• .' fr - IIIT ) aA ... or 4,.. • I/ dilt •it, , 1 ' ..... i I. • i ------ I . 1 r v r, cf et r;,..... 114... 4 .e,i I * -- .lb 1111; ) -.:.-7 Ili g ac a . , • ... t , . NI i e' • • Itii , ' • ;- 11 p , ' • lk ft . 6 , ....,,,,, •1, r - 4 t 4 '-...st ' . r frrr rtir 2 •allii ..1" 1 ..%i i . _ 1 l•- tiagiA 1 r..-ke dm ar A 0 • . : i .; Ept „. 1 • Ill , 11,1,ifiA # -. . . .. • . Of v. 1 I ...,.. ( .i• 1-1,4, .0 gi , • 1 R J UP 4'll, r- 77-141.03 iI fili TL,, tat i ir Jr 1 ..,.1.11 I I,t, ' : i 1 jr '11 1401 1 L -or '-1 : t 111 , ; i • • g 4 A , . I, f- , It I. . ,Iii: i II tril g ... t -*.• 116:'i I ! • ' . 1 II, .A.__ ,, 1 fi I 4 • 4,11 I IR 4. if ill _ 1 kt 1 _ 'I ! .. i l I 11/1 r- 1 ..._I , 1 \ IP \ f WI _ , , i. 1!ii , . , i ,C . ._. , L 4.; . ,Si . ;• il. . • ; .., , .- . .... .vtti .1 . , 11 i . • '._ • .:, r • . 1 1 1 4 \*- I -...... , L., Pig if . r=-. - _.• .... 1 F . ..e , . t . Ili L__ w+4 t. I t, lig9 ti 'r-tt . tti Pt% I NJ I I . N., -.j II )or 1 lip ' 1 *. 6Il r -- •* \ IP - --J '44441/4.. •At 1 4 I .go .;"-:-i 0 1‘ . . '• 1 141.004: iv A .1/41 '14 H11.1141 t .. 0 , ' 4_ • o �'' • •,• +l 'i 1 it ii i t i .1 \\‘ all ii ‘.m:witt.1-._. ma \111.31tli:;; !,‘\;..1.‘ , . ,:.. it„. A Sll! ' _. .,.., ,, _.,:ill .LI,. _ , . , , ,, — . ___ e \,),,, : 4.1t1 . .., 1 f :::.1' ) .:,1411 4 , '. "Alit 1 . \\. C ttj . , p �ti \ i 1 C a/ (141 1IPo41.7.1.i, . .v It— 41. . . . 1---tio ,Q,,,,,, .7S.1 PL•0"- • ,, , ,...%-16 i,..ii si . sift , .1. ..!.-,..1 , ill ' 11 - It 40_ ' - 11-'1 1-11.. i' 410111n, , .;c4r, iti .... . - , 1 ...., .41 v: 1 Ill w. , , ill A Y ,14i*ii,.,u, .i. Ili I'', 4?:. i :—'9/ ' ,111(4411' ,11411%.' • . '--ii•lri, , ,- ,,v., ,f , . , t sp,,,v.: - . / / - , , i . . AI i,_ A. �i • g ., ,,, .......... ,.... - , , , : . .1 t 10 1 ,i ' -I 1 till i . )•• r Wel- • i 4 ' ° . Iv, , 114' 4i1 ,.1�• C+r , -x s il ) t , ii . ' . to, . olo IMP �. OM �I A '.uki ' ' i 1 (;• . � is _ Ir` • / 4 l�A.t.r . 0 0; Is - , a I ' , • , I, I , I , r:t 1 I \ i / "e . . a; t 1 � yi i , 1�A i ..... t i ill1.' . 1 r — ' ' • �far!f,4'j in 1 it• .0 l i 1 II t / V 1' .�h,� A t ,, , ..A \\\\\ �, 4is t . .4 . k. - '-: XI , .I rir ' 40,041111 , .:i,,Ot ..... . , °. A i . %i oxi . ,4 ' i 0 .40 1 /1 ; '• , pv, ‘ '' -) ‘. 1 k t f: ' A • fvi M r± — �� "�-- . tri 101 kkt ... •r4 , . it ipili ,.. :•., 1 f 1 , ip, p Sok4F 4 ei . IV' °I, 0. ) di 11 . I )1t .';' fi I" i \I 'c ti r (117)3 . 1' .47 . i , • .601jr 1 1 i 11. .' ' 7 r r la . * , 4 • ,.0-4 . ta:2:1"1:\ itAl V • 41. r 41 ' • • ' 1 ; ,\_\ . � , f fly ' • • + ,f � � } 1i1, :' •• i•-i- Le ,i- 'S \ t;,-% \. Ilit -. 41. t 1� r '` I 1 I i 1 i••I F % liii)1 43, ,. . Ok\ ' I 1:1 i 1 4 ,`�„ ,, t t ; +ji . 1 . • ' -te •., leter •■ Ia Jail It i eDlehbtle.1 )41;I i II jit . ....... • ._:- Z -44.- AIN. 0. ,ill 1 a • 1 • • COEIVED MAR 191991 1 CITY OF RENTON . 2 • HEARING EXAMINER 3 BEFORE THE HEARING EXAMINER 4 FOR THE CITY OF RENTON, .WASHINGTON . 5 In re Application of: ) Application 'No,. SA/CU-078-90 6 ) RENTON. VILLAGE ASSOCIATES ) REQUEST FOR RECONSIIDERATION 7 S Renton Village Associates respectfully requests. the Examiner 9 reconsider its March 5, 19.91 Report and Decision ,by deleting • 10 Conditions 2 and 5 (drainage/flooding) and 4 and 6 (building 11 ' height) of the Site Plan Approval, and approving the Conditional • 12 Use Permit (re height) . This request for reconsideration is. 13 ' based upon the errors of law, fact and judgment set forth .herein. 14 I. DRAINAGE/FLOODING SITE PLAN CONDITIONS: 15 No. 2. In order to .protect the public health, safety and. welfare, • no additional development of this site shall occur until the • 16 current flooding problem is resolved. The applicant shall have.to solve the flooding, whether it is by individual action or!by 17 concerted action that involves an LID or• other method, •,prior to issuance of any building permit. 18 No. 5. The lower level of the garage shall not be used for compensating flood storage as it will unduly jeopardize the public ,health, safety and 19 welfare of the general public. • 20 • BASIS FOR RECONSIDERATION • 21 1. The Drainage Plan Not Only Meets, But Exceeds the Renton Code. 22 The applicant's drainage plan exceeds the detention • 23 requirements of the City's new Surface and Storm Water Management 24 Ordinance-. That drainage plan has three major elements for • 25 REOt3EST FOR RECONSIDERATION 1 GOELT\00776.PLD Seattle DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LAW o}1a.n • • 260o G4Nt1)Rr SQUARE•15o1 Fouam AVENUE SEA7?I.E,\/ASNINGarow 98191488 (ao61 6az.uto 1 detention and flood control: (a) subsurface drains below several 2 streets (underground FSC) ; (b) maximum 6" deep storage on part of 3 the ground level of garage; and (c) installation of minimum 72" 4 drainage pipe to replace existing 48" pipe. See ORB Org. 5 Drawing. These three. elements not only exceed Renton's code for 6 this project, but also substantially relieve pre-existing 7 flooding. 8 The drainage plan expressly and fully meets the ERC drainage 9 conditions. The Plan was approved as required by Randall Parsons 10 of the City's Storm Water Utility Division, who stated: 11 We have completed our review of the conceptual drainage plan submitted to us at a 12 meeting last Tuesday, January 15, 1991 by The ORB Organization on behalf of the developer 13 and have approved it with the following conditions [setting forth conditions which 14 the applicant has or will meet] . (City Memorandum, Attachment 1, emphasis added.) 15 In fact, the first two elements (described above) of the 16 drainage plan provide detention facilities which exceed Renton's 17 new surface water management requirements. Specifically, the 18 detention provided is 108% of the capacity_ required under the new 19 code. See ORB Org. Drawing. 20 2 ., Applicant Improves Preexisting Flooding Condition's. 21 The Examiner states in a number of findings and conclusions 22 that the drainage plan "does nothing about the existing 23 [flooding] situation" (Conclusion 1.4 ,, p. 8) . See also findings 24 regarding "no modification of current flooding, " the current 25 REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION - 2 GOELT\0077.6.PLD Seattle DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE Lim OFFICES 2600 CENTURY SQUARE•1501 FOURTH AVENUE SEATrIE,WASHIt4CTON 98H01•1688 1 level of flooding "would not be modified, " and the current 2 conditions "would not be alleviated and the inundation that has 3 occurred in the past would be expected to continue. " Findings 4 33 , 34 , p. 6 . These findings and conclusions are in error and 5 provide further support for eliminating the Examiner's Conditions 6 2 and 5 . 7 The applicant's proposed drainage system, in fact, will 8 significantly improve pre-project drainage and reduce preexisting 9 flooding on the site. Consequently, this project will not only 10 take care of its own drainage requirements, but will also 11 substantially reduce flooding which currently occurs on the site. 12 This net improvement of drainage results from the third . 13 element .of the applicant's drainage plan, i. e. , replacement of an 14 existing 48" pipe with at least a 72" pipe. Currently, there is 15 a 72" pipe which discharges into a 48" pipe just southeast of the 16 Ernst store. During current heavy runoff and storms, this 17 downsizing results in overflow and a flooding backup into the 18 retail parking area. The replacement of the 48" with a minimum 19 72" facility will significantly improve existing flooding and 20 drainage. 21 Though flooding has occurred on nearby Grady Way (caused 22 entirely by off-site runoff) , the final design of this project 23 will significantly reduce or eliminate the 100-year flood plain 24 problems both on site and for Grady Way. 25 REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION - 3 GOELT\00776.PLD Seattle DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LAW OFFICES 2600 CENTURY SQUARE'1501 FOURTH AVENUE SEATTLE,WASHINGTON 98102.1688 • • 1 3 . .Garage Water Detention Presents No Health or Safety Risk. • The entire parking garage is at-grade and will be built on 3 • pilings.. The only reason compensating storage will occur is due 4 to the intended design of the first level floor to "dish" the 5 slab inward to hold a maximum of 6" of 'water, rather than a 6 conventional slab design to cone and drain the water outward. 7 Consequently, there is no risk of personal injury or a 8 threat to ,public safety from a maximum of 6" of water, which has 9 been specifically designed and approved by all appropriate city 10 departments. Both the police and fire departments reviewed and 11 approved the project plans, .and those agencies are expressly 12 charged with protecting and promoting the public health and 13 safety. Likewise, the stormwater utility division, long-range 14 planning office .and every other reviewing agency in the City 15 approved the project without any reference to flooding as 16 creating a public health or safety hazard from a 6" deep 17 • detention facility. 18 The record does nOt .support the Examiner's conclusion that 19 "the lower level of the public garage re-introduces the potential 20 for injury. " Conclusion 30, p. 10. First, the "lower level" is 21 in fact the ground level and is no different than any other 22 surface detention. Second,' the applicant is unaware of any 23 . injury on the Renton Village site from flooding and no evidence 24 was introduced in the record of such injury. As mentioned, both 25 REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION - 4 GOELT\00776.PLD Seattle DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE • LAW OFFICES 2600 CENTURY SQUARE'1501 FOURTH AVENUE SEATTLE,WASHINGTON 98101.1688 1 the fire and police departments reviewed the project and made no 2 mention whatever of health or safety concerns due to flooding. 3 While inconvenient, the intentional flooding of up to 6" in 4 the parking garage is no more, and probably less, of .a factor 5 than typical flooding in streets and parking lots that occurs 6 throughout many parts of the City during flood .conditions. Cars 7 clearly can drive through 6" of water if required. The garage 8 capacity allows all but 49 of the stalls required for the office 9 building to park on above-grade levels (see memorandum 10 Attachment 2) . Consequently, even if the ground level of the 11 garage were functioning with its 6" deep retainage, no one is 12 trapped or prevented from parking above the first ground level. 13 4 . No Garage Access Location Will be Flooded. 14 The significant elimination or reduction of existing 15 flooding problems is an integral part of the scope of this 16 project. The proposed garage has three ingress and egress points, 17 none of which is subject to flooding. These access points 18 directly connect to access routes which do not experience 19 flooding, allowing access to and from the overall site via South 20 Renton Village Place. As mentioned above, the project design 21 will significantly handle pre-existing flooding on site and on 22 Grady Way. Consequently, there is direct parking and access to 23 and from the project, even during flood conditions, which will be 24 safe and with no standing water. 25 REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION - 5 GOELT\00776.PLD Seattle DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LAW OFFICES 7600 CENTURY SQUARE'1501 FOURTH AVENUE • SEATTLE,WASHINGTON 98101.1688 U . 1 5. The Garage Compensating Storage Is Expressly Approved and Allowed by Code. 2 3 The ground level storage was specifically approved by the 4 City's Surface Water Division (see report from R. Parsons) . In fact, Renton's code would allow 12", rather than the 6" proposed 5 for this project. See Attachment 3 from drainage manual. The 6 Code also would allow the entire ground level to be used for 7 storage, whereas the proposal is only to use two-thirds of the 8 ground level. 9 6 . Flooding Is Manageable and of Short Duration. 10 The flooding which currently occurs on-site, and which will 11 not be exacerbated (but in fact will be significantly 12 reduced/eliminated) with the project, is not desireable, but has 13 been and will continue to be manageable. It is typical of flood 14 management which is required throughout other areas of the City. 15 The Renton Village site itself drains within four to six hours, 16 even during heavy flooding. The four existing office buildings, 17 hotel, retail center and cinema, all have functioned in the past 18 despite flooding with no threat to health or safety, although an 19 inconvenience. 20 There is no reason why the proposed project will not 21 function at least as well, and in fact will function better, 22 because of the design of the garage and access routes to streets 23 which do not flood. As with the existing buildings, signage and 24 traffic control can avoid ' flooded areas. This project has been 25 REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION - 6 GOELT\00776.PLD Seattle DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LAW OFFICES 2600 CENTURY SQUARE'1501 FOURTH AVENUE SEATTLE,WASHINGTON 96101.1688 1 singled out., as has no other project in the City of Renton, to 2 prohibit issuance of a building permit even though it exceeds the 3 Renton drainage code by taking care of its own drainage while 4 also substantially improving the preexisting situation. 5 7 . Illegally Appropriated Private Land for Public 6 Flood Storage. 7 The effect of the Examiner's Condition 2 is to illegally 8 appropriate the applicant's private property for public flood 9 detention purposes. This public flood storage is for preexisting 10 flooding which is not in any way caused or exacerbated by this 11 project. In fact, this project is neutral on flooding by clearly 12 compensating for any flood storage displacement which occurs 13 (i.e. , 108% of capacity as provided) . Further, by replacing the 48-inch line with a 72-inch line, it makes substantial 14 15 improvements for preexisting flooding for which this application 16 bears no legal responsibility. 17 Condition 2 's prohibition on development until the current 18 (i. e. , non-project related) flooding is solved is an error at law 19 and in equity. It constitutes a moratorium without any ordinance 20 or other express City Council authorization. There is no 21 rational nexus under the state and federal constitutions for 22 imposing conditions or extracting public benefits (i. e. , public 23 flood storage) , where the project does not contribute to any 24 flooding. Condition 2 is without due process and without 25 compensation and is therefore unconstitutional. See e.g. , Nollan REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION - 7 GOELT\00776.PLD Seattle DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LAW OFFICES 2600 CENTURY SQUARE'1501 FOURTH AVENUE SEATTLE,WASHINGTON 98101.1688 1 v. California Coastal Commission, 483 U. S. 825 , 107 S. Ct. 3141, 2 97 L.Ed. 2d 677 (1987) . 3 The unconstitutional appropriation of the Renton Village 4 site for public flood detention is based on the fact that 5 approximately 80-90% (based upon studies conducted by the Federal 6 Emergency Management Agency, the Washington State Department of 7 Transportation, and the City of Renton) of the flooding that 8 occurs on the Renton Village site is generated off-site. Thus, 9 the pre-existing flooding in no way is attributable either to 10 this project or the other buildings currently occupying the 11 Renton Village Shopping Center. 12 This off-site runoff comes off Talbot Hill, across Talbot 13 Road from the Puget Sound Power & Light Facility, or from the 14 Metro's Park and Ride across Grady Way. The Examiner's Condition 15 2 requiring the applicant to solve the flooding problem, either 16 alone or through some other mechanism, is unreasonable and 17 improper. As noted earlier, flood control is an integral part of 18 the scope of this project, and the result will be no increase and 19 a likely decrease in flooding. However, the source of the 20 current flooding is off the applicant's site, and the complete 21 solution is beyond the applicant's control. 22 It is illegal to appropriate public detention without public 23 payment. See e.g. , Nollan, supra; Just v. Marinette County, 56 24 Wis. 2d 7 , 201 N.W. 2d 761 (1972) (preventing owner from using 25 floodplain property deemed an unconstitutional taking) ; Ackerman REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION - 8 GOELT\00776.PLD Seattle DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LAW OFFICES 7600 CENTURY SQUARE•1501 FOURTH AVENUE SEATTLE,WASHINGTON 9610.688 1 v. Port, of Seattle, 55 Wn.2d 400 , 348 P. 2d 664 (1960) (flight 2 path over property deemed unconstitutional taking of an easement 3 which required compensation) . 4 Not only is the site being used to store the general 5 public's flood waters, but the public is in fact in control of 6 the outflow from the property. Public actions themselves are 7 preventing drainage from the site. Specifically, flooding on the 8 Renton Village site is directly controlled by public agencies' 9 constriction of the outflow gate under Highway 405. 10 8 . The Examiners Conditions Constitute an Improper Moratorium. 11 Finally, the Examiner's Condition 2 amounts to a development 12 moratorium until some publicly-funded or sponsored area-wide 13 flood control measure is instituted. That constitutes a 14 moratorium, which in order to be valid must be for a reasonable 15 period of time with evidence that the public agency imposing the 16 moratorium has taken reasonable steps to solve the condition. 17 Here, none of those conditions are met. See Washington Market 18 Ent. , Inc. v. City of Trenton, 68 N.J. 107 , 343 A. 2d 408 (1975) ; 19 Cappture Realty Corp. v. Board of Adjustment, 126 N.J. Super. 20 200, 313 A. 2d 624 (1973) , aff'd. , 133 N.J. Super. 216, 336 A. 2d. 21 3.0 (1975) 22 II. HEIGHT REDUCTION CONDITIONS AND CUP DENIAL. 23 No. 4. The building shall not exceed 95 feet in height. 24 25 REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION - 9 GOELT\00776.PLD Seattle DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LAW OFFICES 2600 CENTURY SQUARE'1501 FOURTH AVENUE SEATTLE,WASHINGTON 08101.1688 I....A1 l.....rrn 1 No. 6. The garage shall be reduced in size to provide a reduction in parking stalls in proportion to the reduction in office 2 building size.. 3 CUP. The Conditional Use Permit is denied. A. TRAFFIC—BASIS FOR RECONSIDERATION. 4 1. All ERC Conditions Have Been Fully Met. 5 The applicant is required to make specific roadway and 6 access improvements, as well as contribute substantial funds, as 7 part of complying with the ERC conditions . The City of Renton 8 has not proposed, much less imposed a moratorium, either on the 9 Grady Way corridor or more generally at some Level of Service 10 threshold. However, the Examiner's conditions reducing height 11 effectively have imposed a moratorium upon traffic at some 12 unspecified level. Any curtailing of development to reduce 13 traffic impacts should be done on an area-wide, ordinance basis 14 by the City Council, and not through an individual permit 15 decision that otherwise fully meets the City's code and the SEPA 16 conditions imposed by the ERC. 17 2 . The Applicant Has Met the Adopted SEPA 18 Policies for Traffic. 19 The State and City SEPA requirements specifically require 20 that any mitigation, such as height reduction to reduce traffic, 21 be based, upon adopted, written policies in effect at the time of 22 the decision which are specifically cited by the decisionmaker. 23 WAC 197-11-660; RMC 4-6-22 . Here, the applicant is unaware of 24 any SEPA policy which would authorize the reduction of building 25 REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION - 10 GOELT\00776.PLD Seattle DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LAW OFFICES 2600 CENTURY SQUARE•1501 FOURTH AVENUE 1 height for traffic mitigation, and the Examiner has not cited any 2 in its decision. 3 The applicant prepared a complete traffic impact and 4 mitigation study by The Transpo Group. That study was done to 5 comply with the City's adopted SEPA and traffic policies. The 6 study provides in part: 7 City of Renton Standards 8 The City 'of Renton policy for traffic mitigation is set forth in a memo that is 9 distributed by the Traffic Division. For intersections, the policy states: 10 "The developer is expected to maintain with 11 their development the same level of service • that would be anticipated in the horizon year 12 if the site were not developed. (Unless the horizon year level of service is at C or 13 above) . " 14 Transpo Report (excerpt of p. 17) , Attachment 4 . The Transpo 15 study goes on to state at page 19 : "Per the City's guidelines, 16 no intersection-specific mitigation is required [for the proposed • 17 project] . However, the project will be preparing a TMP with the 18 City of Renton. " 19 Further, the project makes a substantial financing 20 contribution to the Grady Way TBD to additional traffic analysis 21 and makes site-specific physical improvements for transportation. 22 The report further notes that: 23 The nature of traffic generated by office projects lends them to successful 24 transportation management plans (TMPs) . Currently, three office buildings in the 25 Renton Village campus are occupied by Boeing, REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION - 11 GOELT\00776.PLD Seattle DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LAW OrncES 2600 CENTURY SQUARE'1501 FOURTH AVENUE SEATTLE,WASHINGTON 98IOI.1688 1 One Renton Place, Two Renton Place and Three Renton Place. Successful TMPs are operated 2 at these offices which consistently result in the 15% ride share. Since Boeing will occupy 3 the Village Place North building, it is suggested that a similar TMP be developed for 4 the office portion of the project. 5 See Attachment 4 . Such a TMP was imposed by the ERC and will be 6 fully implemented by the applicant. 7 Consequently, the City's adopted SEPA or other 8 transportation policies have been fully met since the Level of 9 Service at the various intersections will not be reduced as a 10 result of this project. The project adds only 4% to the peak 11 hour traffic, which cannot justify a three-story reduction in 12 building height. 13 3 . The Level of Service Is the Same With or Without the Project. 14 The applicant's traffic study, as well as the City's 15. analysis, confirm the Level of Service of the intersections 16 affected by the project will have the same level of service with 17 or without the project. .Consequently, without a change in level 18 of service, the reduction of the building height to achieve a 19 reduction in traffic volume is in error and contrary to law. 20 In its traffic analysis for the project, the Transpo Group 21 summarized, "We have found that the Grady Way TBD study accounts 22 for the planned build-out of the Village Place North site 23 . " Consequently, the applicant's contribution is 24 consistent with and partially implements the City's establishment 25 REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION - 12 GOELT\00776.PLD Seattle DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LAW OFFICES 2600 CENTURY SQUARE'1501 FOURTH AVENUE SEATTLE,WASHINGTON 08101.1688 1 of the TBD. The City did not choose a partial moratorium or 2 place any traffic capacity limits on Grady Way independent of the 3 TBD. Yet, the Examiner's height conditions do so by denying the 4 CUP and reducing the building height to 95 feet. 5 B. Comprehensive Plan/Compatible Surroundings. 6 1. The Renton Village Site Is Better than Downtown for Ten-Story Building. 7 To the extent the building height reduction was• based upon 8 the CUP criteria regarding the Comprehensive Plan and 9 compatibility with surrounding properties, this' site, rather than 10 downtown, is clearly preferred for a ten-story office building. 11 There currently are no downtown buildings over three stories, 12 except for the mid-rise height of City Hall. The existing 13 streets in downtown are narrow and not expandable. Consequently, 14 the traffic generated by the project would not be handled by 15 existing roads, which in turn are much further from the major 16 highway corridors of I-405 and SR 167 . 17 The staff found that the 10-story height is compatible with 18 the nearby buildings, including the office buildings and the 19 Holiday Inn. Staff further concluded "The proposed location 20 provides sufficient separation from other structures on the site 21 to allow air and light circulation on the site, to offer 22 attractive view corridors and to ensure adequate 23 privacy/defensible space. " Staff Report, p. 8 , Q C(3) . 24 25 REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION -. 13 GOELT\00776.PLD Seattle DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LAW OFFICES 2600 CENTURY SQUARE'1501 FOURTH AVENUE SEATTLE,WASHINGTON 08101.1688 1 Further, this site presents a clear separation of the 2 commercial areas from residential areas with its road network, 3 greenbelts and topographic changes. Finally, it is doubtful that 4 a ten-story building could be approved downtown due to the 5 proximity to the airport and required FAA approval (which in fact 6 was necessary and obtained for this site) . 7 2 . A Ten-Story Building Is Compatible With Existing Development. 8 Unlike downtown, the Renton Village site currently has a 9 strong office building character. Although somewhat higher than 10 the existing office buildings on the Renton Village site, this 11 variation clearly is in scale and supported by existing building 12 height as well as power poles (see Attachment 5 showing sea level 13 elevations; with the various site gradations the proposed 14 building is actually only 24 feet higher than Three Renton 15 Place) . 16 C. View Blockage. 17 1. View Blockage Is Not a Legal Basis for 18 Height Reduction. 19 As recognized by the Examiner, the City Code and SEPA 20 policies simply do not address view blockage, nor do any adopted 21 SEPA policies. The Examiner has correctly concluded that "as 22 long as the problems of glare and reflection are adequately 23 addressed, the question of view cannot otherwise be weighed in 24 this analysis. " 25 REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION - 14 GOELT\00776.PLD Seattle DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LAW OFFICES 2600 CENTURY SQUARE'1501 FOURTH AVENUE SEATO.E,WASHINGTON 08101.1688 1 As required. by Condition 9 , which is fully acceptable to the 2 applicant, light and glare will be addressed. The applicant 3 acknowledges the building will impact views of some residences 4 that are located approximately 1, 200 feet from the project. 5 However, though the Examiner recognized some views would be 6 blocked, he noted that "these impacts are to be expected. " 7 (Conclusion 26, p. 10) . The building is clearly compatible and 8 in scale with the surrounding buildings, which include four 9 • office buildings with a height of approximately 107 feet (to the 10 top of the elevator penthouse) . See Attachment 6 . 11 2'. . The Parking Garage Is Six Levels, Not Stories.. 12 To the extent the Examiner was concerned about the height of 13 the garage and any view blockage, it is important to clarify that 14 the garage is five "levels, " not five "stories. " While generally 15 referring to the garage as six "levels, " the Examiner 16 specifically equated the six-story existing office buildings with 17 a six "story" parking structure. Paragraph 37 , p. 11. The parking 18 garage is 54 feet, which would equate to four "stories" as 19 normally used for an office building. 20 CONCLUSION 21 Based upon the foregoing, the applicant requests the 22. Examiner reconsider its decision and approve the Conditional Use 23 Permit for a 10-story office building and eliminate, Conditions 2 , 24 4 , 5 and 6 from the Site Plan approval. [Note: Attachments 5 25 and 6 are illustrations prepared by Mr. Cloepfil, one of REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION - 15 GOELT\00776.PLD Seattle DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LAW OFFICES 2600 CENTURY SQUARE•1501 FOURTH AVENUE SEATTLE,WASHINCTON 58101•1688 1 applicant's witnesses, of sea level elevations and view corridors 2 from Talbot Hill based on public record information and/or 3 hearing testimony by the applicant or other witnesses. These 4 illustrations are not currently part of the record submittals. 5 They are submitted with this reconsideration request in response 6 to the conclusions contained in the Examiner's report. ] 7 RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, this 19th day of March, 1991.. 8 DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE Attorneys for Renton Vi)lage 9 Associates 10 . By 11 Thomas . oeltz WSBA #05157 12 13 By • Robert L. Hill 14 WSBA #19928 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION - 16 GOELT\00776.PLD Seattle DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LAW OrncEs 2600 CENTURY SQUARE'1501 FOURTH AVENUE SEATTLE,WASHINGTON 98101.1688 46 CIT�� OF RENT ON of 1 �: �r �t i� -443 Hearing Examiner Earl Clymer, Mayor Fred J.Kaufman March 29, 1991 Thomas A. Goeltz DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE 2600 Century Square 1501 Fourth Avenue Seattle, WA 98101-1688 Re: Request for Reconsideration Renton Village Associates SA, CU-078-90 Dear Mr. Goeltz: Before proceeding with the response to this request for reconsideration, this office would like to reiterate that the addition of this well-designed office building, its accessory garage, and the renovation of the existing shopping center is supported in the main. There were certain particulars that suggested that the height of the office building be reduced to the limits permitted by code and the applicant not be granted a discretionary permit to exceed that limit. The history of the site and its permitting has demonstrated that while flooding has been a recurrent problem each new permit request has indicated that the flooding problem would eventually be addressed. There is no certainty that flooding resolution will occur even with this newest permit. At this juncture it seems appropriate to finally rectify, and not just somewhat limit, an existing serious problem. This office can see no reason to modify the decision regarding the flooding issue since life-safety appears to be at stake. Since this office is certain the flooding issue will be appealed to the City Council, this office will also leave undisturbed its determination on the Conditional Use Permit. With an appeal almost certain, this office will limit its response to the issues of traffic and the height of the building, other than to reaffirm them as indicated below, and will defer to the Council these particular issues. This response will be framed and numbered according to the applicant's request for reconsideration, although some paragraphs have been combined where issues appeared interrelated. The attachments from the applicant were reviewed by this office but have not been distributed with this response. They are available for review in the Examiner's office. I Drainage/Flooding 1/2. As framed by the request for reconsideration, one would think that no flooding problem exists that needs solution. On Page 3, Line 21 of the request the applicant states: "Though flooding has occurred on nearby Grady Way (caused entirely by off-site runoff), the final design of this project will significantly reduce or eliminate the 100-year flood plain problems on site and for Grady Way." (Emphasis in original). 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2593 . Y If that is the case, then there should be no objection to the condition which requires that flooding on the site be eliminated. If the 8% additional storage capacity will solve the existing situation, it would be welcomed. If it will not, then there is still no solution to a potentially dangerous situation. Flooding can be dangerous in itself, it could increase the risk of electrocution, and it seriously impairs the passage of emergency vehicles when traffic is backed up because of it. The storm drainage plans submitted by the applicant were conceptual in nature, not definite. Nor did they appear to address the complete impact. Mr. Parsons did not simply approve the plans but suggested further study may be required, particularly of down-stream impacts. While this office does not believe that a complete drainage plan is necessary at this stage, what it did require was that whatever plans evolve should conclusively solve the existing problem. 3/4/5/6. Introducing additional development and additional people on a site prone to severe flooding just does not make sense. It's obvious the city is concerned about this issue or else it would not have required a "Hold Harmless" agreement that specifically mentions the issue of life safety. The applicant mis-read Mr. Parsons response regarding using the first level of the garage for flood storage. It was not completely approved. A number of safety issues were raised which were not explored further in his analysis. Restricting access to the garage during flooding would not prevent people who are already in that area from being surprised by rising flood waters. If that area where to be screened off at any sign of rain, then the parking would be more or less unavailable for code required parking. Somehow retaining flood water in a relatively closed building (the parking garage) as opposed to an open parking lot (code specific reference) is inappropriate. The code seems to distinguish between "parking lot" and "roof ponding" and does not specifically approve the use of an indoor level of a "parking garage." Life safety cannot be dismissed as an issue. Just review the language in the "Hold Harmless Agreement." It is revealing. "1. Acknowledgment of Flood Plain. Renton Village hereby acknowledges that City has informed Renton Village that the property legally described on Exhibit A attached hereto ("Property") is located in an area that may be included in a 100-year flood plain as of the date of this Agreement. Notwithstanding this information, Renton Village has decided to proceed with development of the Property. (Emphasis in original). 2. Hold Harmless. Renton Village hereby releases and agrees to indemnify and hold City harmless from any damage to the Property, or to property, improvements or persons located on the Property, and from any liability, suit, action, judgment or claim arising from any flooding of the Property resulting from conditions of the Property and surrounding area existing as of the date of the Agreement or resulting from Renton Village's work on the Property pursuant to Site Plan No. Cu; SA; V-078- 90 and any building permit(s) related thereto." (Emphasis supplied). This type of agreement is rare. It certainly does not put employees or patrons who work or visit the site on notice that they may be in jeopardy. It seems logical to finally solve a recurring problem before encouraging additional people from coming to this site. 7. The only response to the applicant's statement that such a requirement would result in an unconstitutional taking of a portion of their property for a public purpose, is that it flies in the face of recent decisions of both the United States and Washington State Supreme Courts (See Bituminous Coal • -2_ • Assn, 480 U.S. 470; Presbytery of Seattle v. King County, 114 Wn.2d 320). The Nollan case cited by the applicant responds to an entirely different issue. The applicant already has reasonable use of at least a portion of the subject site. Further, one can only find a "taking" if one grants the applicant's initial premise - that is, that development rights have been denied. That is not what the decision does. Nothing has been taken. No one has suggested that they not develop in this flood zone. The only relief sought in this case is that the applicant solve any existing flooding problems before potentially jeopardizing additional lives or property. Finally, the applicant indicates that since the site does not cause the flooding it should not have to solve it. Just a simple query: What wetland or flood plain does create its own flooded condition? Is this not the natural result of geologic conditions that appropriate lowlands for flooding when there is storm water runoff from uplands? 8. The, applicant suggests that requiring a solution to this problem creates a de facto moratorium. If the imposition of reasonable conditions delays a project then that might be the case. Many conditions are placed on property, and anytime they seem burdensome, or they are not complied with, they could (this office hazards to guess) constitute a moratorium using the applicant's definition. Again, if, as the applicant suggests, the flooding problem is not so severe, then it should not be that hard to solve. II Conditional Use Permit A. Traffic-Basis 1/2/3. The denial of what is a discretionary permit, the Conditional Use Permit, cannot be viewed as the imposition of a moratorium. The applicant is not entitled to automatic approval of a conditional use permit. A conditional use permit is discretionary and can be turned down if it has detrimental impacts. So, not only does a taller building have aesthetic impacts (view blockage), but by accommodating more tenants it has definite traffic impacts. If the reduction in building height reduces traffic, where traffic is already bad, then there is one additional reason not to approve a discretionary conditional use permit. 2/3. While the applicant is technically correct when it says the LOS will not be reduced, that is solely because an LOS worse than F has not been defined. Since the definition LOS F translates into "intolerable delays" that definition probably could not be improved upon to indicate an even worse traffic situation. So while the applicant is correct, and the LOS will not get worse than LOS F, that is a technical distinction. City policy does not require ignoring worsening traffic conditions where delays are intolerable. This is restated by the Transpo Group report at page 17 where they state it does not meet threshold traffic requirements of the city. These various intersections will be LOS F for longer periods, prolonging the rush hour's intolerable traffic and adding to congestion both earlier and later in the day. This office did not intend to second guess some of the traffic estimates. The decision was made in light of the current traffic situation. It was also made in light of the fact that traffic improvements that will accommodate this new traffic remain unfunded or underfunded and unrealized, even in the horizon year. B/C. Comprehensive Plan/View Blockage 1. This office will not argue with the applicant's or staff interpretation of the Comprehensive Plan. It can be read in any number of ways. Obviously the B-1 zone is quite permissive, permitting any commercial use from one-story, mom and pop groceries to 95 foot tall office buildings in the same B-1 -3- • • zone. With a conditional use permit, buildings may be even taller. A simple review of the applicant's latest renderings (Attachment 6) shows the substantial difference between an expansive, low-rise shopping center and one developed with tall office buildings. There is no way either. the residents on Talbot Hill or the applicant could predict with any certainty what would be permitted on the subject site. Neither the Comprehensive Plan nor the Zoning Code suggest with any specificity.where,a demarcation between a low-rise shopping center or a high-rise office and commercial district should occur. Both this office and the applicant can find supportive language in the Comprehensive Plan for either position. Generally, land use intensity drops off and building heights fall at the edge of a zoning district. The juxtaposition of I-405 could,or not, modify this general principle. This office partially followed that land use principle and partially ignored it since this office did approve a 95 foot tall building. The existing buildings have already created a height precedent, but it did not seem necessary to extend it further for this building in this location. It did seem to this office that it might be better to encourage more intense development in what had been the city's commercial core. This office did not entirely deny office development. A building that meets the normal height limit of the B-`1 zone was approved. The building was scaled back to permit office development, but development that would at the same time preserve some views, potentially distribute traffic a little more evenly, and reduce the bulk of the parking garage. The idea that a.taller building would preserve more open space on this campus is belied by the fact that the taller building requires greater parking. To accommodate more parking, the applicant has proposed a very large parking garage. The garage itself is almost as large as some office towers. And again, looking at the applicant's rendering (Attachment 6) the distinction between a six-story or six- level garage is difficult to ascertain. It may be shorter, but it is not significantly shorter. Therefore, the supposedly reduced footprint of the office tower is more than made up for by the footprint of the parking garage. In conclusion, and in a vein similar to the opening, this office will once again acknowledge that the office building, parking garage, and general renovation will improve this area of the city. It will definitely be a design asset to the city, but under.the circumstances outlined above, the original decision will not be modified. It is in light of these circumstances that the decision was issued and conditioned as it was, and it is why the decision remains unmodified by this review. If this office can be of any further assistance, please feel free to write. A right to appeal this determination and the original determination must be exercised no later than 5:00 P.M. on April 12, 1991. Sincerely, •\(-04-411------ FRED J. KA FMAN HEARING EXAMINER FJK/dk cc: All Parties of Record All Parties of Staff -4-