Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLUA88-010 December 16, 1991 Renton City Council Minute? _ Pane 418 Finance: 1990 Audit Ways and Means Committee Chairman Stredicke presented a report stating Report that the Committee recommended concurrence in the Administration Services Department recommendation that Firemen's Pension Fund investment grade corporate bonds not be sold at this time. MOVED BY STREDICKE, . SECONDED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. NEW BUSINESS Council President-Elect Keolker-Wheeler appointed Council President Pro Council: Committee on Tempore Edwards, and Councilmember Nelson to membership on the Committees, Council Committee on Committees. Ms. Keolker-Wheeler announced that the Committees Structure Committee will make a recommendation regarding Committee structure on 1/6/92. She requested that comments and suggestions be submitted to committee members prior to the Committee's 1/2/92 meeting. Council: Commendation, Councilman Edwards expressed appreciation to Councilwoman Zimmerman, Zimmerman whose term ends 12/31/91, for the valuable contributions she has made as a City Councilmember. ADMINISTRATIVE Referred 11/18/91 - Ruth Larson, 714 High Avenue South, Renton, REPORT requested replacement of a missing load limit sign at the bottom of Renton Citizen Comment: Larson Hill. Memorandum from Transportation Systems Manager Mel Wilson stated - Load Limit Sign that the sign had been replaced. Rezone: Good Shepherd Referred 12/2/91 - Councilwoman Zimmerman requested a status report of Homes Status Report, R- the Good Shepherd Homes located at NE 19th Street (R-010-88) and Olympia 01� 0- 8 & R-015-88 Avenue NE (R-015-88). Memorandum from Planning/Building/Public Works Administrator Guttmann stated that the Good Shepherd homes were issued Certificates of Occupancy on 11/14/91. WSDOT: I-405 S-Curve Referred 12/2/91 - Councilman'Stredicke requested information regarding Project Report enforcement of noise violations on the S-Curve project. Memorandum from Captain Don Persson, Police Department, stated that responding to comments from a citizen that construction noise on the I-405 project had continued late into the night, he investigated and found that no variance had been obtain for late night construction. He took the following action: 1) Advised that the citizen call 9-1-1 if construction occurred after 10:00 p.m. so a noise complaint would be on record; and 2) Contacted Guy Atkinson Construction to advise that no variance was in force for late-night construction, and that workers on the site could be subject to citation or arrest if a complaint was received. Captain Persson further stated that no charges were filed since a formal complaint was not received and violation was not witnessed by any City employee. Executive Session MOVED BY NELSON, SECONDED BY ZIMMERMAN, COUNCIL CONVENE INTO EXECUTIVE SESSION TO DISCUSS CONTRACT • NEGOTIATIONS (Time 10:30 p.m.). ADJOURNMENT MOVED BY NELSON, SECONDED BY ZIMMERMAN, COUNCIL ADJOURN . CARRIED. Time 10:45 p.m. • 01/ ARILYN J. T RSEN, CMC, City Clerk Recorder: Nancy Mills 12/16/91 MAYOR'S ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT RESPONSES TO COUNCIL INQUIRIES AND CITIZENS CONCERNS December 16, 1991 11/18/91 Ruth Larson, 714 High Avenue South, Renton requested replacement of a missing load limit sign at the bottom of Renton Hill. 12/02/91 Councilwoman Zimmerman requested status report of Good Shepherd Homes. 12/02/91 Councilman Stredicke requested information on SR 405 S-curves regarding a noise complaint • December 2, 1991 Renton City Council Minutes . Page 396 Resolution #2$71 A resolution was read authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to enter into an Planning: Interlocal interlocal cooperative agreement with King County to establish a Growth Agreement Management Planning Council of King County to assist in adopting County- Comprehensive Plan wide planning policies. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY County-wide Planning KEOLKER-WHEELER, COUNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS Policies PRESENTED. CARRIED. NEW BUSINESS MOVED BY NELSON, SECONDED BY ZIMMERMAN, COUNCIL REFER Police: Establishment of THE ISSUE OF "DRUG-FREE ZONES" TO THE ADMINISTRATION FOR "Drug-Free Zones" THE DEVELOPMENT OF AN ISSUE PAPER. CARRIED. Rezone: Good Shepherd Councilwoman Zimmerman requested a status report on the Good Shepherd Homes Status Report, R- group homes located at NE 19th Street (R-010-88) and Olympia Avenue NE 010-88 & R-015-88 (R-015-88). Policy: Mayor's MOVED BY ZIMMERMAN, SECONDED BY STREDICKE, COUNCIL Compensation REFER THE POLICY ISSUE OF WHETHER THE MAYOR'S SALARY SHOULD BE THE HIGHEST PAID POSITION IN THE CITY TO THE COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE FOR REVIEW. CARRIED. SCA: Establishment of Councilwoman Zimmerman suggested that the formation of a regional issues City of Renton Regional committee would provide an opportunity for more Councilmembers to be Issues Committee knowledgeable regarding regional issues. MOVED BY ZIMMERMAN, SECONDED BY EDWARDS, COUNCIL REFER DISCUSSION OF A REGIONAL ISSUES COMMITTEE TO THE COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE. CARRIED. Utility: TCI Cable Rates Councilman Stredicke noted that TCI cable is increasing its basic service rate to $19.42, and the charge for new service connection to $60.00. Utility: Plastic Recycling MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY ZIMMERMAN, Options COUNCIL REFER PLASTIC RECYCLING OPTIONS TO THE UTILITIES COMMITTEE. CARRIED. ADJOURNMENT MOVED BY ZIMMERMAN, SECONDED BY NELSON, COUNCIL ADJOURN. CARRIED. Time 9:02 p.m. Ag4; MARILYN J RSEN, CMC, City Clerk Recorder: Nancy Mills 12/2/91 CITY OF RENTON MEMORANDUM DATE: December 9, 1991 TO: Renton City Council VIA: Mayor Clymer FROM: n tmann, Administrator Planni Building/Public Works Department STAFF CONTACT: Jim Hanson Development Services Manager SUBJECT: Occupancy of Good Shepard,Hom , N.E. 19th Street and Olympia Avenue N.E. Ref#106-91 Each of the above referenced homes was issued their respective Certificate of Occupancy on November 14, 1991. RENTON CITY COUNCIL Regular Meeting December 2, 1991 Municipal Building Monday, 7:30 p.m. Council Chambers MINUTES CALL TO ORDER Mayor Earl Clymer led the Pledge of Allegiance to the flag and called the meeting of the Renton City Council to order. ROLL CALL OF TONI NELSON, Council President; THERESA ZIMMERMAN; KATHY COUNCIL MEMBERS KEOLKER-WHEELER; RICHARD STREDICKE; ROBERT EDWARDS; TIM SCHLITZER; NANCY MATHEWS. CITY STAFF IN EARL CLYMER, Mayor; LAWRENCE J. WARREN, City Attorney; JAY ATTENDANCE COVINGTON, Executive Assistant; MARILYN PETERSEN, City Clerk; DAVID MARTIN, Transportation Planning Manager;.RICHARD ANDERSON, Utility Services Manager; JAMES HANSON, Development Services Manager; DAN CLEMENTS, Administrative Services Administrator; IWEN WANG, Deputy Finance Director; JOAN PRINGLE, Budget Analyst; RUBEN NIETO, Personnel Director; JOHN WEBLEY, Community Services Administrator; SAM CHASTAIN, Parks Director; RON SHELLEY, Housing & Human Services Coordinator; CLARK PETERSEN, Library Director; DEPUTY CHIEF JAMES MATTHEW, Fire Department; CHIEF ALAN WALLIS, LIEUTENANT RICK STODDARD, Police Department. PRESS Dean Radford, Valley Daily News; Geordie Wilson, South Seattle Times APPROVAL OF MOVED BY NELSON, SECONDED BY STREDICKE, COUNCIL APPROVE COUNCIL MINUTES THE MINUTES OF NOVEMBER 25, 1991, AS PRESENTED. CARRIED. PROCLAMATIONS A proclamation by Mayor Clymer was read declaring December, 1991, as Free Enterprise Month, Free Enterprise Month; and urging all citizens to support Distributive 12/91 Education Clubs of America (DECA) in promoting the importance of the free enterprise system. MOVED BY NELSON, SECONDED BY KEOLKER- WHEELER, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE PROCLAMATION. CARRIED. Police: Drunk & Drugged A proclamation by Mayor Clymer was read declaring 12/7/91 through Driving Awareness Week, 12/13/91 as Drunk and Drugged Driving Awareness Week, and urging all 12/7-12/13/91 citizens of Renton to remember that "Friends don't let friends drive drunk." MOVED BY NELSON, SECONDED BY EDWARDS, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE PROCLAMATION. CARRIED. Police: Alcohol Blood MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY ZIMMERMAN, THAT THE Level Reduction SUBJECT OF REDUCING THE ALCOHOL BLOOD LEVEL COUNT IN THE CITY OF RENTON BE REFERRED TO THE ADMINISTRATION FOR RECOMMENDATION, AND THAT THE BLOOD LEVEL COUNT IN RENTON BE EQUAL TO THAT REQUIRED BY THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY. CARRIED. SPECIAL Terry Paananen, Project Engineer for the I-405 Project, Washington State PRESENTATION Department of Transportation (WSDOT), reported that: WSDOT: I-405 S-Curve Project Report 1) The project on Main near 4th has been completed, and prior traffic configuration has been restored. 2) One pipeline cutover has been accomplished, the second cutover will be completed by Christmas, and the third cutover will be completed by mid-January. .__,. )..The.completion. of the overall project is projected for May, 1992. Councilman Stredicke urged that violation of noise level restrictions on the S- Curve Project be enforced by the City. - . _ In response to Councilwoman Keolker-Wheeler's inquiries, Mr. Paananen stated that during 1/92, a revision will be constructed below the existing Third and Mill detour which will direct traffic off of Third Street and reenter Third at the intersection near the NARCO access road. He reported • that the revision will consist of an asphalt, two-way roadway with a sidewalk area and will be completed in 24 hours; and that a flagger will be on duty while the detour revision is under'construction. He further reported that this traffic revision is necessary for trenching and installation of the third pipeline cutover. Responding to Ms. Keolker-Wheeler's request, Mr. Paananen said that the need for installation of lighting at the curve on the • Renton Hill access road will be investigated .. - .. • CITY OF RENTON MEMORANDUM DATE: December 9, 1991 , TO: City Council THROUGH: Mayor Earl Clymer FROM: uttmann SUBJECT: SR 5 S-Curves--Noise Complaint It was reported in the SR 405 S-Curves Construction Steering Committee minutes of November 1, 1991 that Police Captain Don Perrson . had received a complaint about construction noise occuring on Renton Hill after 10: 00 P.M. The Council has questioned why no citation was issued to the contractor for this noise complaint. Captain Persson reports that he was told by a Renton Hill resident that she had been kept awake by construction noise. He instructed the citizen to call 911 if she wished to record a formal complaint. He also spoke with Guy F. Atkinson Construction, advising them 'that no noise variance had been granted and that no construction work was allowed past 10: 00 P.M. No official complaint has been received by the Renton Police Department and no city employee has witnessed a noise violation. Under these circumstances, filing charges would not be the appropriate action to take. Both WSDOT and the contractor are aware that they have no authority to work outside of the City'.s "legal" hours of 7: 00 A.M. to 10: 00 P.M. December 2. 1991 Renton City Council Minutes Pane 396 Resolution #2871_ A resolution was read authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to enter into an Planning: Interlocal interlocal cooperative agreement with King County to establish a Growth Agreement Management Planning Council of King County to assist in adopting County- Comprehensive Plan wide planning policies. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED. BY County-wide Planning KEOLKER-WHEELER, COUNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS Policies PRESENTED. CARRIED. NEW BUSINESS MOVED BY NELSON, SECONDED BY ZIMMERMAN, COUNCIL REFER Police: Establishment of THE ISSUE OF "DRUG-FREE ZONES" TO THE ADMINISTRATION FOR ' "Drug-Free Zones" THE DEVELOPMENT OF AN ISSUE PAPER. CARRIED. Rezone: Good Shepherd Councilwoman Zimmerman requested a status report on the Good Shepherd Homes Status Report, R- group homes located at NE 19th Street (R-010-88) and Olympia Avenue NE 01` & R-015-88 -- (R-015-88). Policy: Mayor's MOVED BY ZIMMERMAN, SECONDED BY STREDICKE, COUNCIL Compensation REFER THE POLICY ISSUE OF WHETHER THE MAYOR'S SALARY SHOULD BE THE HIGHEST PAID POSITION IN THE CITY TO THE COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE FOR REVIEW. CARRIED. SCA: Establishment of Councilwoman Zimmerman suggested that the formation of a regional issues City of Renton Regional committee would provide an opportunity for more Councilmembers to be. Issues Committee knowledgeable regarding regional issues. MOVED BY ZIMMERMAN, SECONDED BY EDWARDS, COUNCIL REFER DISCUSSION OF A REGIONAL ISSUES COMMITTEE TO THE COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE. CARRIED. Utility: TCI Cable Rates Councilman Stredicke noted that TCI cable is increasing its basic service rate to $19.42, and the charge for new service connection to $60.00. Utility: Plastic Recycling MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY ZIMMERMAN, Options COUNCIL REFER PLASTIC RECYCLING OPTIONS TO THE UTILITIES COMMITTEE. CARRIED. ADJOURNMENT MOVED BY ZIMMERMAN, SECONDED BY NELSON, COUNCIL ADJOURN. CARRIED. Time 9:02 p.m. 1)2) . MARILYN J RSEN, CMC, City Clerk Recorder: Nancy Mills 12/2/91 STeotemb'er 9, 1991 Renton City Council Minutes Page 312 This increased expenditure is for that portion of Airport Improvement Project work related to the installation of the new Airport security fence and gates that is not reimbursable by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). MOVED BY EDWARDS, SECONDED BY ZIMMERMAN, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Public Safety Committee Referred 8/26/91 - Public Safety Committee Chairman Zimmerman presented King County: Regional a report stating that the Committee met on 9/5/91 to discuss two potential Justice Center sites for the proposed regional justice center. Site #63 - 1500 Houser Way South (60 acres) Site #66 - Monster Road SW & Oakesdale Avenue SW (7.2 acres) Ms. Zimmerman also reported that it was the unanimous recommendation of the Committee that Site #66 remain open for consideration on the condition that if this site is seriously considered by the County, it should be done in conjunction with the City of Tukwila and with consideration of the wetlands that are located on that site. The Committee further recommended that Council adopt a position opposing Site #63 due to proximity of residential areas, difficulties in transportation access, and proximity to future recreational trail systems. Finally, the Committee recommended that Council take a position supportive of a regional justice center in South King County. MOVED BY ZIMMERMAN, SECONDED BY TANNER, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT.* In response to Councilman Edwards inquiry, Ms. Zimmerman stated that the comment regarding proximity to future recreational facilities was prompted by information which indicated that 60 percent of the prisoners released from the regional justice site would remain in the area for some time. It was also noted that prisoners are released at all hours of the day and night. *MOTION CARRIED. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS Ways & Means Ways and Means Committee Vice Chairman Keolker-Wheeler presented the Committee following resolution for reading and adoption: Resolution #2864 A resolution was read authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to enter into an CAG: 91-092, Jail Health interlocal cooperative agreement for jail health services with the Seattle-King Services Contract, County Department of Public Health. MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, Seattle-King County SECONDED BY MATHEWS, COUNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS Health Department PRESENTED. CARRIED. Resolution #2865 A resolution was read authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign an CAG: 91-093, Narcotics agreement between the State of Washington Department of Community Task Force Grant Development and the City of Renton for funding for the South King County Agreement Narcotics Task Force. MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY MATHEWS, COUNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS PRESENTED. CARRIED. Vouchers Ways and Means Committee Vice Chairman Keolker-Wheeler presented a report recommending approval of payment claims checks #82623 through 82984 and four wire transfers totaling $2,462,889.23 and payroll vouchers #101892 through 102350, and 264 direct deposits, in the amount of $895,658.51. MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY MATHEWS, COUNCIL CONCUR IN APPROVAL OF THE VOUCHERS. CARRIED. ADMINISTRATIVE Referred 8/12/91 - Request for information on flood control at NE 19th near REPORT Good Shepherd Home and 10th and Anacortes near Honeydew Estates and Public Works: Flood Martin Luther King Jr. Church. Control, Good Shepherd Home, N. 19th (R-01 - Memorandum from Mayor Clymer stated the following: 4.88 • & Martin Luther King Jr. Church, NE 1) NE 19th/Good Shepherd Group Home - Last winter the construction of 10th & Anacortes (A- the home did adversely impact the neighborhood; however, the City's 004-88) open ditch drainage fronting the site and installation of drainage improvements should alleviate any drainage problems. 2) NE 10th and Anacortes Avenue NE - In the 1989 and 1990 winter rainfall period, ponding occurred at this intersection. Three things caused the problem: • September 9, 1991 • Renton City Council Minutes Page 313 a) Construction of a new church east of Anacortes Avenue NE under County jurisdiction resulted in an on-site drainage problem. The water flowed across the neighbor's property which was within Renton City limits and then.into the 10th and Anacortes intersection. b) The receiving drainage system was under capacity, and the County failed to consider this in the design of drainage facilities. c) Storm lines between NE 10th Street and Sunset Avenue NE contributed to the ponding, and were repaired by City staff in spring, 1990. Mayor Clymer advised that no ponding has occurred since the 1989/1990 problems were addressed. Police: State Department Referred 8/19/91 - Request for information on scope of State authority to of Corrections, Work site work release facilities. Memorandum from Chief Alan L. Wallis, Police Release Facility Department, reported that Bob Moore, Assistant Director, Northwest area, State Department of Corrections, advised that the Department of Corrections will place newspaper ads to solicit suggestions for potential sites, potential locations will be selected, and a search committee will review the selections. Mr. Moore further stated that the Department is not exempt from local land use rules, and must comply with all requirements. Fire: I-405 S-Curve Referred 8/19/91 - Emergency access to Renton Hill during winter months. Project, Renton Hill Memorandum from Chief A. Lee Wheeler, Fire Department, reported that all Emergency Access emergency access points for Renton Hill can be reached by the use of a bolt cutter, and that Chief Gibbs, King County Fire District #40, is aware of the emergency access situation. Fire: City Aid Car Referred 8/26/91 - Councilman Stredicke requested a status report on aid car Service service in the City. Memorandum from Chief Wheeler stated that a back-up aid unit car was in reserve at Station #13, and was put into service as Aid Car #11 when a recent accident occurred. AUDIENCE COMMENT W. F. Lynn, 3625 Lake Washington Boulevard North, Renton, opposed the Public Works: BNR proposed LID approach to modifying the crossing in the 3600-3800 block of Private Crossing, Lake Lake Washington Boulevard North for the following reasons: Washington Blvd. North 1) This action is not responsive to the original request (F.W. Kendrick on 4/22/91) to declare the existing crossing public in order to relieve residents of requirements.for permits and liability insurance imposed by Burlington Northern Railroad (BNR). 2) The LID would be appropriate if residents were petitioning to annex an area to the City which did not meet City Code requirements. 3) This crossing has been used as a crossing for public and private vehicles for many years. 4) The addition of the proposed turn-around on the west side of the crossing will make access more difficult for the properties closest to the crossing. Mr. Lynn requested that the City take action to designate the crossing "public." Executive Session MOVED BY MATHEWS, SECONDED BY ZIMMERMAN, COUNCIL CONVENE INTO EXECUTIVE SESSION TO DISCUSS POTENTIAL LITIGATION. (Time 9:00 p.m.). ADJOURNMENT MOVED BY MATHEWS, SECONDED BY ZIMMERMAN, COUNCIL ADJOURN. CARRIED. Time 9:25 p.m. MARILYN . E ERSEN, CMC, City Clerk Recorder: Nancy Mills 9/9/91 MAYOR'S ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT RESPONSES TO COUNCIL INQUIRIES AND CITIZENS CONCERNS September 9, 1991 8/12/91 Council requested that Administration review flood control on NE 19th near the Good Shepherd Home and flooding problem on 10th and Anacortes by Honeydew Estates and Martin Luther King Jr. Church prior to rainy season. 8/19/91 Council requested information regarding the City's ability to stop the siting of a work release facility in Renton per a letter from the State indicating it's intention to put the facility in King County. • 8/19/91 Councilman Edwards asked about the interlocal agreement with Fire District #40 for emergency access to Renton Hill of the new road is inaccessible due to inclement weather in the winter. 8/26/91 Councilman Stredicke asked whether the City's emergency response capabilities were impaired as a result of an aid car being out of service due to a recent accident. August 12 1991 • Renton r ncil Minutes Pa e 2 2 CAG: 91-088 &089, Referred 8/5/91 - Planningand heevelopm omm eet Comm ded ittee ChairmanrMath❑ s PACCAR & Orchards presented a report stating that tssoci Landc cUse Rev ew,eStalzer toeincrea entheir contract with the City by $12,000.00 tot allow contites amendents to tne consultnt agreement with Bill nuing work on land use and environmental elements for development proposals for PACCAR'and EDWARDS, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. DY CARRIED. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS Waysns Ways and Means Committee Chairman Stredicke presented the following mmit ordinances for second and final reading: Ordinan #4 2 An ordinance was read amending subsection 7-2-5.B.8 of Chapter 2, Fire: Underground Underground Storage Tank Secondary Containment Ordinance, of Title VII Storage TankSecondary pFrotecttion. MOVED BYire tions), of tSTREDICKE$SECONDED BY ZIMMERMAN,Code relatin to requirements for overflow 11 Containment Requirements COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. or ti., 4324 An ordinance was read amending Chapter 14, Litter, of Title VI (Police Legal: Modification of Regulation's) by adding another section, amending Section 6-18-12 of Chapter Bench Warrant 18, Penal Code, of Title VI (Police Regulations), and subsection 10-12-22.H Procedures• of Chapter 12, Traffic Code, of Title X (Traffic) of the City Code relating to violations and penalties. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. Ordinance #4325 An ordinance and summary ordinance were read granting unto Washington Public Works: Washington Natural Gas Company, a Washington Corporation, the right and franchise to Natural Gas Franchise use and occupy the streets, avenues, roads, and other public rights of way of Agreement the City of Renton, Washington, for constructing, maintaining, repairing, • renewing and operating a gas distribution system and accessories within and through the City of Renton. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY CE AND SUMMARY ORDINANCE OASNREADCIL DROLL CAOLOPT THE DALL NAYES. CARRIED. Ways and Means Committee Chairman Stredicke presented a Committee report recommending the following ordinance for first reading: Budget: 1991 An ordinance was read providing City of Renton 1991 mid-year Housekeeping housekeeping amendments in the amount of S14,653,729; 1991 amended Amendments budget$103,332,032. MOPED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BYYS AND ZIMMERMAN, COUNCIL REFER ORDINANCE BACK TO ` EA MNS COMMITTEE FOR ONE WEEK. CARRIED. Ways and Means Committee Chairman Stredicke presented a Committee report recommending the following resolution for reading and adoption: Resoluion #2859 ;� A resolution was read authorizing the ayQ a^`t t'ity Clerk to sign an CAG: 91-041, Interlocal amended interlocal agreement for. regional planning of the Central Puget Agreement, Central Puget Sound Area. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY KEOLKER- Sound Regional Council WHEELER, COUNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS PRESENTED. CARRIED. Vouchers Ways and Means Committee Chairman Stredicke presented a report recommending approval of payment claims checks #81758 through 82297 and four wire transfers totaling S2,799,837.57 and payroll vouchers #100934 through 101418, and 260 direct deposits, in the amount of S915,865.40. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, COUNCIL CONCUR IN APPROVAL OF THE VOUCHERS. CARRIED. NEW BUSINESS Following discussion•about the City's disaster preparedness plan for flood • Fire: Disaster emergencies, it was MOVED BY ZIMMERMAN, SECONDED BY TANNER, • Preparedness, Flood COUNCIL REFER THIS MATTER TO THE COMMITTEE OF THE Emergencies WH LE. CARRIED. Councilwoman Zimmerman reported that a citizen had expressed concern about potential winter flooding near the Good Shepherd Group Home property on NE 19th Street. Ms. Zimmerman requested that the Administration investigate this matter. • August 12, 1 •1 Renton City Council Minutes Page 28� Councilman Stredicke requested that the Administration address potential flooding problems in the area near the intersection at 10th and Anacortes. Parks: Coulon Park, In response to citizen concern regarding the imposition of assessment fees on Assessment of Non- non-resident park facility users at Gene Coulon Park, it was MOVED BY Residents • ZIMMERMAN, SECONDED BY TANNER, COUNCIL REFER THIS MATTER TO THE ADMINISTRATION. Mr. Stredicke requested that the Administration provide copies of the report on this issue to the newspapers when it is completed. *MOTION CARRIED. • • Planning: Growth Councilwoman Zimmerman referenced substitute House Bill 1025 regarding Management &Regional growth management, and expressed concern regarding coordination between Justice Center, growth management time schedule and the schedule for the siting of the Coordination of Timelines regional justice center. She requested that the Administration investigate this issue to eliminate duplication of effort. Planning: Growth Councilwoman Zimmerman requested that the City Attorney review the •Management, Appeal Growth Management legislation passed in 1991 pertaining to the protection of Rights government agencies by attorney/client privilege and the implications of this section on a private party's right to seek judicial relief. Airport: Seaplane Ramp Responding to citizen inquiries regarding seaplane ramp congestion, it was Congestion MOVED BY EDWARDS, SECONDED BY STREDICKE, COUNCIL REFER THE ISSUE OF SEAPLANE RAMP CONGESTION TO THE TRANSPORTATION (AVIATION) COMMITTEE. CARRIED. Councilman Tanner noted that the seaplane operation is not part of the airport, and asked the Administration to-review whether the same restrictions should apply to the seaplane facility. Mayor Clymer will review the matter with the Airport Director. Airport: Lease MOVED BY EDWARDS, SECONDED BY STREDICKE, COUNCIL REFER Negotiations THE ISSUE OF'AIRPORT LEASE NEGOTIATIONS TO THE TRANSPORTATION (AVIATION) COMMITTEE.•CARRIED. ADJOURNMENT MOVED BY NELSON, SECONDED BY TANNER, COUNCIL ADJOURN. CARRIED. Time 8:07 p.m. MARILY / _ERSEN, CMC, City Clerk • Recorder: Nancy Mills 8/12/91 • • • . RECFJVED CITY OF RENTON SEP 5 1991 Memorandum RENTON ON CITY COUNCIL • Date: September 5, 1991 • • � To: Council President Nelson � i Councilmembers From: Earl Clymer, Mayor Subject: Inquiry Regarding Flood Control on NE 19th Near Good Shepherd Home and on 10th and Anacortes Near Martin Luther King Jr. Church In response to your inquiry regarding the above subject, I received the following report from the Public Works Department: NE 19th/Good Shepherd: The Maintenance Division has never responded to any surface water problems at this location. Last winter the construction of the Good Shepherd structure did adversely impact it's neighbors, including some surface water problems. However, the City's open ditch drainage that fronts the Good Shepherd site functioned as designed. additionally, Good Shepherd was required to install some drainage improvements as part of their construction permit approval. Those improvements have been installed and should help insure that no drainage problems develop in that area in the future. NE 10th and Anacortes Avenue NE: During an abnormally heavy rainfall period in the winter of 1989 and 1990, ponding did occur at this low lying intersection. Three things conspired to cause the problem. First, the construction of a new church just east of the Anacortes Avenue NE. The construction site was in the county, and the temporary surface water controls•'vere not up to City standards.. The on-site drainage systems failed and water flowed across the neighb'or's (City) property and then into the subject intersection. g Secondly, the receiving, downstream drainage system was deemed under capacity by Renton's Storm Water Engineer in his review of the county/church construction plans. The county failed to take the comments into consideration in their approval of the design of the site's temporary and permanent drainage facilities. This, too, added to the ponding problems at NE 10th and Anacortes Avenue NE, and will continue to cause potential problems until the downstream capacity is increased. Thirdly, the condition of the storm lines between NE 10th Street and Sunset Avenue NE contribute to the ponding. The then two-year old Storm Water Maintenance Section had not yet worked it's way into the Honey Dew Estates area. During the spring of 1990, the storm water crews cleaned and inspected the.area, They found and repaired one broken pipe and removed some severe root intrusion in drainage system downstream from the subject intersection. Even though the under-capacity condition remains, the work done to make the existing -pipes as functional as possible seems to have eliminated much of the problem During • both the November 1990, and April 1991 storms, there was no ponding at the NE 10th • • .:::Street-and Anacortes Avenue NE intersection,.and to our knowledge there has been no ponding since the '1989/1990 problem. • Lu-U v VV CITY) F RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works Department Earl Clymer, Mayor Lynn Guttman,Administrator August 7, 1991 Charles L. Hunter, President Hunter Construction P. 0. Box 410 Gig Harbor, Washington 98335 SUBJECT: Good Shepherd Group Homes Landscaping Deficiencies 1025 Olympia Ave. N.E./B-16164; ECF015-88 4001 N.E. 19th Street/B15619; CU010-88 Dear Mr. Hunter: The following lists by address, with accompanying copies of the landscape plan for that particular project showing plant deficiencies, are being provided so that you may make the appropriate corrections prior to the expiration of your temporary occupancy permits. 1025 Olympia Avenue N. E./B-16164 NAME # MISSING Rhododendron 'Christmas Cheer' 1 Rhododendron 'Jean Marie' 1 Douglas Fir 2 Austrian Black Pine 'P. Nigra' 7 Winter Barberry 'B. Crassifollia' 1 The landscape area between the sidewalk and curb paralleling Olympia Avenue N. E. was to be planted in grass. My inspection on August 5th indicated that weeds and dirt are predominant. Hydroseeding or a definite indication of grass being planted will be required prior to final occupancy. 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 Charles L. Huntez August 7 , 1991 Page 2 4001 N.E. 19th Street/B-15619 NAME # MISSING Red Maple 'Acer Rubrum' 1 Pear ' Chojuro ' 1 Plum ' Brooks ' 1 Cherry ' Stella' Very sick Rhododendron ' Christmas Cheer' 2 Rhododendron 'Jean Marie' 1 Japanese Skimmia 'Skimmia Japonica' 8 In the landscaping which parallels N.E. 19th Street the ground cover, St. Johnswort 'Hypericum Calycinum, is missing from the barked area. The area intended for grass is mostly dirt and weeds. Both of these areas will need to be corrected prior to final occupancy. I am available at 277-6169 should you have further questions. --S± e 1 y, Ro e t L. ur, Land Use Inspector Development Services cc: Ron Nelson, Building Official Neil Maune, Building Inspector File/B-15619 and B-16164 File/CU010-88 and ECF015-88 . . . . . , .. Ci • . . • . • . . . • NE 10th COURT OLYMPIA AVE. N.E. . ___ •. _ _ . — . • . , libihiLli::. L.A 1.4ms.,44 .1,4 co. . . • ' i • , ......, 0 ' 71 4 uiN ,, 1 i ,........, .. „ f • * (.1..-•\ -''',: '.-- • ).----- ° 5j4660:b0Pbg, •j 1 r );• \ 0.11111101,0. / • /I 1 ' • . . ...) , Ilr EXISTING TREES ••. . . 110 X• SJ . / 1.4141 ( TO REMAIN SJ / 5J CO " f / 5.) i - ..• . ''I 5J ( I . 1 \ --' .)0 CO / i , • . ,,,,. . 1 , L__4 tA.1 . 4:- / .i .8j. A : -0- . I / . E ISTING T ES, • 5.1 a ; $.1111'. : . • i t 1 A. ' • BE REMO Op e,j 0 ' " OT '' '7 Er; • ( •i ' X ! , I VA4 I 5J . • GROUP 1-40ME * , • , k \I , k > ' SJ . \ ' : . FIN. FL. ELEV. ' . , ) . • . .., / • ,. 424.50' EXISTING TREES . . 8J X . x 3 t, • , IlD TO REMAIN \ \ • I SJ • • , 1 . i 0:17,:j,{1;;Z:';',1;40:4"‘:;:r:iii17.1414"4/111Attlibli. , 1 / t42:4 / . / ip • / ,• IPA I t 4 . , / rz_4!,,,,, . • i oi”:4 . •- x -24.0 ,,'•• . . ..- -....... . ., • / :=1 y , • , -§ , 0 - . ACOUSTICENCE • to • / • . SEE DETAILS/AI - r . • • 1 ; ANA . • . 1 . .. , / i . • - : , . 'OA . „ ' / • ' :. ' VP „..0 A 181.0831 :,/ ---1. .4k X ALL L . \ . S ...'"••-•.- . . /* . • . a lk . ' L4NDSC4PE PLAN I a „ 5 5V. , SCALE: !" . 201-0" IRRIGATE 5Y MANUAL IRRIGATION SYSTEM • . . , • .. . • • r . % n• I6GA WIRE THROUGH / RUBBER GARDEN HOSE . ' 0\ IA ,4 �•"_ -• • .__ - . 19th STREET G . MIS f Plik3rar/S1 Clem . i. ' "i---.. .-.; '---- _ ,...,4A ' • ..,-----..--- --.*‘,.-.. ......-..- 2.,,.- . el...c1.1 ILI (1.1 - - •_`--_..�KYw.__:'.;v. '-�• -..._.. » ;`�' .-r�e��'-" �.!?� e}r�'-� 'ia11/iTP+ryY�''°an.--,'.w�--..___ _�-_ • . . .. F3��-.." F.�' 1,:s.1j-.z�vaa.......ld�waiFil:t;s���...-��'.;r,»=._?':ic=.3-_ _ ..•.v-_ // ""'. 4- - 41-0" HIGN CE1D=CE D / Y�RD 0 4 I ■. ■ ■ • / �� 4" HAND L y \ Nl'DR�4NT - LZ U d � s }■ _ ` ► 1 lY kJ kJ �. I - w 0It- • v �� 3/a" PSG I / \ •LAWN / e U \ Z ._ = to I YARD 0„ ®� N �j / . _ - _ u 0 Z I ` 1 1-4YDRANT ►�i $14:�" �I �' .' '�y`' , • '\t • om ` 1 �-A r. / i:� ` \ '. • !� - . il • ...., • zi. et,666J ... . - , - \ „ ►b, 9 a 0:,.._: 7- .J I CHERRY U - I/t;.1-= 'STEEL } I ` _� i •■ z ■ - YARD \ • GROUP I-10ME I . -1.11 . . Z HYDRANT •' •aa ft '�- ) - 1 <Ict Is - APPLE d /. . ut 'K1NCa' I i V • -� r. �� • U • a . ' r PEAR ®o \ / ' . r - _ • `4 /Ft.um 'GHOJtlRO !c o0 0 0 YARD op 4� . .+\�� '5ROOKS 0 O: OQ HYDRAN /\ T • i vQ --ao 7,44; o' o - GO 34" PVC 0■ l LAWN II\�. 1 1 MANUAL DRAIN , s YARD O -_ 0a. • HYDRANT OO . \ ASSEMBLY i; OQ -Oa � � � D . o CIO o / o 00 0 - - ao . - `) _ _.� �� of CIT' OF RENTON Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Earl Clymer, Mayor Lynn Guttmann, Administrator February 4, 1991 U.S. Dept of Housing & Urban Dev c/o Seattle Mortgage Company 1800 - 112th Ave NE Bellevue, WA 98004 SUBJECT: Good Shepherd of Washington, Group Home-4001 NE 19th Street (R-010-88) Ladies/Gentlemen: At the request of Edward Ball, President of Good Shepherd of Washington, I am writing to confirm the current status of the above-referenced project. On November 27, 1989, the City of Renton confirmed reclassification of the site to General Use (G-1) by Ordinance No. 4250 (see Enclosure #1). Under the City of Renton Zoning Code, group homes are allowed as a conditional use in the G-1 zone. The City has granted the applicant a conditional use permit to develop a group home for developmentally disabled adults at this site; the proposed facility conforms to all applicable Zoning Ordinance development standards for group homes in the G-1 zone (see Enclosure #2). A building permit for the home was issued by the City on September 24, 1990 (see Enclosure#3). If you have any questions or require additional information, please contact me at 235-2550. Sincerely, Lenora Blauman Senior Planner Enclosures 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 d% 0 CITE OF RENTON "LL Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Earl Clymer, Mayor Lynn Guttmann, Administrator January 21, 1991 U.S. Dept of Housing&Urban Dev c/o Seattle Mortgage Company -112th Ave :La IN/ Bellevue,WA 98004 SUBJECT: Good Shepherd of Washington, Group Home-4001 NE 19th Street(R-010-88) Ladies/Gentlemen: At the request of Edward Ball, President of Good Shepherd of Washington, I am writing to confirm the current status of the above-referenced project. On November 27, 1989, the City of Renton confirmed reclassification of the site to General Use (G-1) by Ordinance No.4250 (see Enclosure#1). Under the City of Renton Zoning Code, group homes are allowed as a conditional use in the G-1 zone. The City has granted the applicant a conditional use permit to develop a group home for developmentally disabled adults at this site;the proposed facility conforms to all applicable Zoning Ordinance development standards for group homes in the G-1 zone (see Enclosure#2). A building permit for the home was issued by the City on September 24, 1990 (see Enclosure#3). If you have questions or require additional information, please contact me at 235-2550. Sincerely, Oi*lit4i4.6141° Lenora Blauman Senior Planner Enclosures • 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 • tfi CITN 7F RENTON Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Earl Clymer, Mayor Lynn Guttmann, Administrator October 4, 1990 Keith Dearborn Ferguson and Burdell Attorneys at Law Pacific First Centre 1420 Fifth Avenue#3400 Seattle,Washington 98101 SUBJECT: Good Shepherd Group Home, N.E. 19th Street/Shelton Avenue, (R-010-88) Dear Mr.Dearborn: This letter is written in response to your inquiry of October 2,1990 concerning the above-referenced project. You are correct in your understanding that the rezone of the group home project was approved subject to development of that property within a one year period ending April 24, 1990 and that if development did not occur,zoning on the property would revert from G-1 to its original R-1 designation. In the City of Renton,"development"is traditionally interpreted to mean"reasonable progress"toward implementation of an approved plan. Given the complexity of this project,reasonable progress has been achieved,based upon the fact that the applicant obtained a building permit and a preliminary letter of interest from Seattle Mortgage Company for HUD funding prior to the deadline of April 24, 1990. If you have any questions or would like additional information please contact me at 235-2550. Sincerely, "\ Lenora Blauman Project Manager 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2631 • LAW OFFICES OF PLANNING DIVISION Ferguson 8 Burclell CITY OF RENTON PACIFIC FIRST CENTRE OCT v 3 1990 1420 FIFTH AVENUE,#3400 SEATTLE, 82 WASHINGTONX: 9 1292-04 I -t�� � TELEX:32-0382 FAX:(206)292-0460 (206) 622-1711 KEITH W. DEARBORN October 2, 1990 Seattle Office Lenora Blauman Senior Planner, City of Renton 200 Mill Ave. S. Renton, Washington 98055 Dear Lenora: I am writing to summarize our conversation of September 27, 1990 regarding interpretation of covenants recorded by the City on the 19th Street Good Shepherd project. One of the project covenants requires development of the property within one year. You indicated that the City considers this to mean that reasonable progress has been made and that reasonable progress includes issuance of a building permit. The building permit for the 19th Street project was issued prior to the expiration of the one year period (April 24, 1990) and therefore the City considers this specific covenant satisfied. I appreciate your prompt response to my inquiry, and I hope I have accurately summarized our discussion. Thank you. Very truly yours, /C Keith W. Dearborn KWD:11 059E1219 SEATTLE • BELLEVUE • ANCHORAGE September 17. 1990 Renton City Council Minut Page 285 Citizen Comment: Evans Ralph Evans, 3306 NE 11 th Place, Renton, commended the development of - Good Shepherd Group the Citizens Appeal Handbook. He also pointed out that the list of building Home Rezone, NE 19th permits published by the City and attached to Council minutes each week Street, R-010-88 never reflected the issuance of the Good Shepherd group home (NE 19th Street) building permit; therefore, citizens were not informed of that action. Citizen Comment: Evans Patricia Evans, 3306 NE 11 th Place, Renton, said she was party of record for - Good Shepherd Group 19th and Shelton Good Shepherd group home rezone, but never received Home Rezone, NE 19th information regarding the issuance of a building permit. City Clerk Street, R-Q10-88 explained that a party of record is notified throughout the rezone approval and appeal process. Once the rezone is approved and the applicant is notified, the matter is final and the notification process ends. Planning: Review of In response to Councilman Edwards' inquiry regarding the procedures for Permit Procedures publishing information regarding building permits, City Attorney Warren explained that administrative permits require review of the permit application to determine compliance with codes and applicable conditions, but these permits are not published except for those included in the building permit list that accompanies Council minutes. He said administrative permits do not require a public hearing or meeting. MOVED BY ZIMMERMAN, SECONDED BY EDWARDS, COUNCIL REFER THE MATTER OF ISSUANCE OF PERMITS TO THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE FOR REVIEW AND STUDY. ROLL CALL: AYES: ZIMMERMAN, TANNER, STREDICKE, EDWARDS. NAYS: MATHEWS, NELSON, KEOLKER-WHEELER. CARRIED. CONSENT AGENDA Items on the consent agenda are adopted by one motion which follows the listing. Claim: Gileck, CL-56-90 Claim for damages in the estimated amount of $1,500.00 filed by Karl E. Gileck, 321 Wildcat Street SE, Olympia, 98503, for damage to truck allegedly caused when struck by a City operated truck on South 19th Street and South 26th Street (08/31/90). Refer to City Attorney and insurance service. Claim: Huniu, CL-57-90 Claim for damages in an estimated amount of $136.88 filed by Mary Ann Huniu, 15642 SE 139th Place, Renton, for punctured tire allegedly caused by exposed manhole cover on North 3rd Street (08/14/90). Refer to City Attorney and insurance service. Utility: Water Shutoff Administrative Services/Utility Billing requested amendment to Ordinance Delinquency Fee No. 4079 to impose a $20.00 delinquency fee for water shutoffs to owners/occupants who have failed to pay for service or are otherwise in violation of Code requirements. Refer to Utilities Committee. Police: Criminal Code Police Department requested amendment to Chapter 10, Criminal Code of Amendment Title VI (Police Regulations) to reflect changes made in adopted State statutes. Refer to Public Safety Committee. MOVED BY MATHEWS, SECONDED BY STREDICKE, COUNCIL ADOPT THE CONSENT AGENDA. CARRIED. CORRESPONDENCE Council President Mathews presented correspondence from Mayor Doreen Suburban Cities: Growth Marchione, City of Redmond, regarding a proposal for distribution of Management Funds Growth Management Act (SHB2929) grant funds and a work program to Distribution discuss mutual issues developed by the King County Planning Directors Association. The grant funding criteria require a regional application that allows each jurisdiction and the region to make progress toward meeting state • requirements. Ms. Mathews explained that the Growth Management Act provides for planning funds in the amount of $35,000.00 per jurisdiction plus a percentage of the population, and that a resolution supporting the allocation is required for allocation of funds. MOVED BY MATHEWS, SECONDED BY TANNER, COUNCIL REFER THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT PROPOSAL AND DRAFT RESOLUTION TO THE WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE. CARRIED. OLD BUSINESS Community Services Committee Chairman Zimmerman presented a report Committee Services stating that the Committee, at its August 28, 1990 meeting, reviewed the Committee mid-year funding request for $5,000.00 from the King County Sexual Assault Budget: King County Resource Center. Although the Committee recognized the City's current Sexual Assault Resource budgetary constraints, it believes that this request is merited. The Committee Center Mid-Year Budget recommended that the request be granted and that the Administration Request determine the source of funding. 43_ O( o g- Tc ors _ ?LANNING DIVISION COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMITTEE CITY OF RENTON COMMITTEE REPORT AUG 15 igg j AUGUST 13, 1990 r "'. 4 RALPH EVANS' COMPLAINT CONCERNING NON-COMPLIANCE BY GOOD SHEPHERED OF CONDITION ON DEVELOPMENT (REVERSIONARY ZONING ISSUE) (Referred 8/6/90) The Community Services Committee met on this topic on an expedited basis on August 7, 1990. The committee discussed Mr. Evans' letter of complaint and reviewed the procedures necessary to adopt a rezone ordinance for Good Shepherd, should Mr. Evans' complaint prove justified. The committee requested an opinion from the City Attorney concerning its jurisdiction to handle this matter and was advised that the matter is an administrative determination which should be handled pursuant to city code. The City Attorney's opinion, as requested by the committee, concerning Mr. Evans' appeal rights is attached hereto. • • � a glferesa Zimmerman, Chair L Jesse Tanner, Vice-Chair Toni Nelson, Member Attachments AEPPOV D Copies : Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Lynn Guttmann, Administrator Lenora Blauman, Planning Division J CITY „IF RENTON Office of the City Attorney Earl Clymer, Mayor Lawrence J. Warren August 10, 1990 TO: Community Services Committee FROM: Lawrence J. Warren,' City Attorney RE: Ralph Evans' Zoning Complaint Concerning Good Shepherd Dear Committee Members : As requested at your committee meeting of August 7, 1990, I have researched the city code concerning administrative appeals . I have found that Mr. Evans has an administrative appeal within fourteen ( 14) day of the issuance of the building permit. for Good Shepherd. After that time he does not have an administrative appeal and his complaint would be handled as a complaint of non- compliance with the underlying land use decision. See city code section 4-8-11A. 3, particularly the last paragraph thereof. Legally, the council must retain the final authority on zoning matters . That authority is exercised by passing a zoning ordinance with whatever conditions the council chooses to impose upon that zoning action. Once the zoning ordinance is passed, the day-to-day handling of the details of enforcement and application of the zoning ordinance passes to the administration. As a part of the administration of the zoning decision, certain administrative decisions will be made. Those decisions usually result in the issuance of some sort of a development permit. If there are any issues involving the administrative determinations of the city, they should have solidified at the point of issuance of the development permit. Any citizen aggrieved by the administrative determinations can appeal within fourteen ( 14) days after the issuance of the development permit. After that point in time the developer has the right to rely upon that permit and begin development without fearing that the permit will be challenged. One can see the inherent unfairness in permitting a late appeal. The developer could have the structure half completed when the appeal was filed and be facing the possibility of losing the authority to complete the structure. If that occurred, the likely result would be a lawsuit against the city with some possibility that the city would be paying damages to the developer. Therefore, the present code is a balance between the right of the citizens to address government for redress of their grievances and the rights of the developer to have some assurance in the validity Post Office Box 626 - 100 S 2nd Street-Renton, Washington 98057- (206) 255-8678 ' Community Services Committee • August 10, 1990 Page 2 of its permits once obtained and after the fourteen day appeal period runs . If, for some reason, the council believes that the balance has been improperly drawn, it may choose to redraft the administrative appeal section of the city code. To summarize, Mr. Evans may appeal the administrative determination if it is within fourteen ( 14) days of the issuance of the building permit. If that time period has run, his complaint will be treated as a complaint of non-compliance with the land use decision. Since it appears that the administration has already rejected his complaint, if there is no administrative appeal right remaining, then his only forum would be the courts . • If I can provide you with any further formation please let me know. Lawrence J. Warren LJW:as . cc: Mayor Clymer A8 . 59 :51 . • ' 4-8=11 4-8-11 •4-8-11::- APPLICATIONS: Section shall not create an appeal right, but will be treated as a complaint of noncom- , :A.. App• lications to Building Department: Appli- pliance with the land use decision. (Ord. cations as specified in Section 4-8-10, except 4168, 8-8-88) appeals of administrative or environmental Applications to Examiner: Appeals from ad- ing Department. shall be filed with the Build- B. ministrative determinations of the City's land Department. use regulation codes and from environmental 1. Within fifteen (15) days of receipt of an determinations required by the Renton envi- ronmental ordinance may be taken to the application the Building Department shall HearingExaminer by any person aggrieved, determine whether the application is coin- or by any officer, department, board or plete. If complete, the application shall be bureau of the City affected by such deter- accepted. If the application is not complete, urination. the Building Department shall request the applicant to provide additional information as 1. Any such appeal shall be filed in necessary to complete the application. Within writing- ten (10) days of receipt of new or additional with the Examiner within the following time information, the Building Department shall limits: accept or reject the application. (Ord. 3454, a. Appeals of a final environmental 7-28-80, amd. Ord. 3592, 12 14 81) determination under the Renton environ- 2. The applicant shall be advised of the date mental ordinance shall be filed within four- of acceptance of the application and of the teen (14) days of publication of notice of such environmental determination. The applicant determination. shall be advised of the date of any public hearing at least ten (10) days prior to the b. Appeals from an administrative deci- hearing. sion pursuant to this Chapter shall be filed within fourteen (14) days of the date that the '3. The appeal from an administration decision action was taken. implementing a land use decision of the City Council or the Hearing Examiner pursuant to 2. Immediately upon receipt of the notice of this Chapter shall be filed with the Hearing appeal, the Hearing Examiner shall forward Examiner, along with the required to the officer from whom the appeal is being fee, within taken a co of the notice of appeal. Upon fourteen (14) days of the administrative deci- receivingsuch notice, the officer from whom sion or, if no date of administrative decision the a eal is being taken shall transmit to can be determined, within fourteen (14) days the HearingExaminer all of the records per- of the issuance of any permit which requires tainin to the decision being appealed,interpretation of that land use decision, such ethe gr ivith such additional written reports as to- administrative decision being an essential part re deemed pertinent. The Examiner may re- of the issuance of the permit, license, or other a nest additional information from the City permission to proceed. Any later request q appli- to interpret, explain, modify, or retract the cant. decision shall not be deemed to be a new ad- ministrative determination creating a new 3. A written notice of the time and place of appeal period for any new third party to the the hearing at which the appeal shall be con permit. As between the permit holder and the sidered by the Examiner shall be mailed to City, any decision to modify or retract the the applicant, all parties of record in the case, permit shall give the permit holder fourteen and to the officer from whom the appeal is (14) day appeal period from the date of the taken not less than ten (10) days prior to the action to modify or retract the permit. date of the hearing. (Ord. 3454, 7-28-80) Any claim that an administrative decision 4. The Examiner may hear and consider any maker has failed to correctly interpret or pertinent facts pertaining to the appeal. The enforce a land use decision after the expira- Examiner may affirm the decision or remand tion of the appeal time established in this the case for further proceedings, or it may reverse the decision if the substantial rights RENTON CITY COUNCIL Abbreviated Meeting • August 13, 1990 Municipal Building Monday, 7:30 p.m. Council Chambers MINUTES CALL TO ORDER Mayor Pro Tempore Toni Nelson led the Pledge of Allegiance to the flag and called the meeting of the Renton City Council to order. ROLL CALL OF TONI NELSON, President Pro Tempore; THERESA ZIMMERMAN, JESSE COUNCIL MEMBERS TANNER, KATHY KEOLKER-WHEELER, RICHARD STREDICKE, ROBERT EDWARDS. MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY ZIMMERMAN, COUNCIL EXCUSE ABSENT COUNCIL PRESIDENT NANCY MATHEWS. CARRIED.. CITY STAFF IN JAY COVINGTON, Executive Assistant to the Mayor; BOB SEWELL, ATTENDANCE Assistant City Attorney; MARILYN J. PETERSEN, City Clerk; DAN CLEMENTS, Administrative Services Administrator; IWEN WANG, Deputy Finance Director; DON ERICKSON, Principal Planner; NANCY LASWELL- MORRIS, Principal Planner; RICHARD ANDERSON, Utility Systems ° Manager; GREGG ZIMMERMAN, Utility Plan Review Supervisor; SAM CHASTAIN, Park Director; RONALD SHELLEY, Housing Assistance Specialist; CHIEF GLEN GORDON; Fire Battalion Chief; CAPTAIN DON PERSSON, Police Department. PRESS Tina Hilding, Valley Daily News. APPROVAL OF MOVED BY ZIMMERMAN, SECONDED BY TANNER, COUNCIL COUNCIL MINUTES APPROVE THE MINUTES OF AUGUST 6, 1990, AS PRESENTED. CARRIED. AUDIENCE COMMENT Ralph Evans, 3306 NE 11 th Place, Renton, requested that Council discuss the Advancement Request Good Shepherd group home rezone, NE 19th Street. MOVED BY ! ZIMMERMAN, SECONDED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, COUNCIL SUSPEND THE REGULAR ORDER OF BUSINESS AND ADVANCE TO OLD BUSINESS, COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Community Services Community Services Committee Chairman Zimmerman presented a report Committee stating that on August 7, 1990, the Committee discussed Ralph Evans' Rezone: Good Shepherd inquiries regarding City action on a zoning reversion for the Good Shepherd Group Home Rezone (NE group home property on NE 19th Street, and reviewed the procedures 19th Street), RR-0_ necessary to adopt a rezone ordinance for Good Shepherd. The Committee requested an opinion from the City Attorney concerning its jurisdiction to handle this matter, and was advised that the matter is an administrative determination which should be handled pursuant to City Code. In a memorandum responding to the Committee's request for an opinion concerning Mr. Evans' appeal rights, City Attorney Warren offered the following information: 1) The Council retains the final'authority on zoning matters, and that authority is exercised by passing a zoning ordinance with conditions the Council chooses to impose upon the zoning action. 3) Once approved, enforcement and application of the ordinance is passed to the administration. 4) Administration of the application includes issuance of a development permit. 5) Any citizen aggrieved by the administrative determinations can appeal within fourteen days after the issuance of the development permit. 6) After the appeal period has expired, the developer has the right to rely upon that permit and begin development without fearing that the permit will be challenged. Mr. Warren further stated that if the appeal period has run, Mr. Evans' complaint would be treated as a complaint of non-compliance with the land use decision (City Code Section 4-8-11A.3). Since it appears that the administration has already rejected his complaint, if there is no administrative appeal right remaining, his only forum would be the courts. MOVED BY ZIMMERMAN, SECONDED BY TANNER, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT.* , August 13. 1990 Renton City Council Minutes Page 251 Ralph Evans pointed out that the issuance of the Good Shepherd building permit was first discussed at the Committee of the Whole meeting of April 23, 1990, and the Committee did not mention an appeal period at that meeting or in its report dated May 7, 1990. He said he examined building permit lists from April 16, 1990, to the present, and did not find evidence of issuance of a permit for Good Shepherd. He also stated that, in his opinion, since parties of record have not been notified, the public has not been made aware of the issuance of a building permit for this property. Mr. Evans questioned whether the Mayor's statement at the August 6, 1990, Council meeting concurring in the staff recommendation regarding this matter would be an considered an administrative determination or an answer to a question. He said City Code Section 4.8.11B.1 allows appeals to be made in the 14-day period following an administrative determination. Councilman Tanner stated that the Community Services Committee took the position that there was an administrative determination that the condition of the rezone to develop the property within one year was met by staff through the issuance of a building permit. He said that the recommendation of the Committee is that the Council accept the Committee report and allow Mr. Evans to go forward with whatever appeal rights are available to him. *MOTION CARRIED. Advancement Request Joan Walker, 1433 Monterey Avenue NE, Renton, asked Council to discuss the funding request from the Downtown Renton Association (DRA). MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY ZIMMERMAN, COUNCIL SUSPEND THE REGULAR ORDER OF BUSINESS AND ADVANCE TO CORRESPONDENCE, ITEM 6.A. CARRIED. Citizen Comment: Councilman Stredicke requested that he be excused from Council Chambers Kavesh, Downtown during the discussion of this matter due to a possible conflict of interest. Renton Association Correspondence was read from Jerry Kavesh, President, Downtown Renton (DRA) - Request for Association (DRA), 230 South Main, Renton, stating that the Association Contribution anticipates a three-year start-up budget of approximately $200,000, and is presently raising money throughout the community. He requested that the City contribute $20,000 per year for two years to supplement the funds raised and to allow the DRA to hire a full-time professional administrator to oversee the Association's revitalization efforts in downtown Renton. Joan Walker, 1433 Monterey Avenue NE, Renton, emphasized the importance of the need to hire someone to provide direction to the volunteers and committees of the Downtown Renton Association. MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY EDWARDS, COUNCIL REFER THIS REQUEST TO THE ADMINISTRATION TO REVIEW AND FIND FUNDING WITHIN THE CITY BUDGET FOR THIS PROJECT.* Moved by Tanner, seconded by Zimmerman, to table the motion until such time as the administration checks with the State Attorney General to determine whether it is legal for the city to donate tax money to a private enterprise. Motion failed. ORIGINAL MOTION CARRIED. Councilman Edwards stated his opinion that the City should not be the major contributor of funding. In response to a question raised by Councilman Tanner regarding voting procedure for the Mayor Pro Tempore, Assistant City Attorney Bob Sewell stated that Mayor Pro Tempore Nelson is legally authorized to vote on funding issues. Councilman Stredicke returned to the Council Chambers, having not participated in the discussion nor the vote on this matter. Citizen Comment: Cecile Maxwell, Chairperson, Duwamish Tribe Council, 15616 First Avenue Maxwell, Duwamish South, Seattle, stated the Duwamish Indian Tribe's concern regarding Tribe - Earlington Woods preservation of the archaeological finding of an Indian winter village believed to have been of the Duwamish Tribe, located on the site of the Holly Corporation (Earlington Woods) apartment project, a 196 unit complex located on SW 5th Street. The village was identified 10 years ago during review of the CHG International Preliminary Planned Unit Development (PPUD). COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMITTEE COMMITTEE REPORT AUGUST 13, 1990 RALPH EVANS' COMPLAINT CONCERNING NON-COMPLIANCE BY GOOD SHEPHERED OF CONDITION'ON DEVELOPMENT (REVERSIONARY ZONING ISSUE) (Referred 8/6/90) l The Community Services Committee met on 'this topic on an expedited basis on August 7, 1990. The committee discussed Mr. Evans' letter of complaint and reviewed the procedures necessary to adopt a rezone ordinance for Good Shepherd, should Mr. Evans' complaint prove justified. The committee requested an opinion from the City Attorney concerning its jurisdiction to handle this matter and was advised that the matter is an administrative determination which should be handled pursuant to city code. The City Attorney's opinion, as requested by the committee, concerning Mr. Evans' appeal rights is attached hereto. eresa Zimmerman, Chair L. Jesse Tanner, Vice-Chair Toni Nelson, Member Attachments PPOVL D Copies: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Lynn Guttmann, Administrator Lenora Blauman, Planning Division %10 CITY IF RENTON *NU ' `w: Office of the City Attorney Earl Clymer, Mayor Lawrence J. Warren. August 10, 1990 TO: Community Services Committee FROM: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney RE: Ralph Evans' Zoning Complaint Concerning Good Shepherd Dear Committee Members : As requested at your committee meeting of August 7 , 1990, I have researched the city code concerning administrative appeals . I have found that Mr. Evans has an administrative appeal within fourteen ( 14) day of the issuance of the building permit for Good Shepherd. After that time he does not have an administrative appeal and his complaint would be handled as a complaint of non- compliance with the underlying land use decision. See city code section 4-8-11A. 3, particularly the last paragraph thereof. Legally, the council must retain the final authority on zoning matters . That authority is exercised by passing a zoning ordinance with whatever conditions the council chooses to impose upon that zoning action. Once the zoning ordinance is passed, the day-to-day handling of the details of enforcement and application of the zoning ordinance passes to the administration. As a part of the administration of the zoning decision, certain administrative decisions will be made. Those decisions usually result in the issuance of some sort of a development permit. If there are any issues involving the administrative determinations of the city, they should have solidified at the point of issuance of the development , permit. Any citizen aggrieved by the administrative determinations can appeal within fourteen ( 14) days after the issuance of the development permit. After that point in time the developer has the right to rely upon that permit and begin development without fearing that the permit will be challenged. One can see the inherent unfairness in permitting a late appeal. The developer could have the structure half completed when the appeal was filed and be facing the possibility of losing the authority to complete the structure. If that occurred, the likely result would be a lawsuit against the city with some possibility that the city would be paying damages to the developer. Therefore, the present code is a balance between the right of the citizens to address government for redress of their grievances and the rights of the developer to have some assurance in the validity Post Office Box 626- 100 S 2nd Street-Renton, Washington 98057- (206) 255-8678 • Community Services C_. _tittee ) August 10, 1990 Page 2 of its permits once obtained and after the fourteen day appeal period runs. If, for some reason, the council believes that the balance has been improperly drawn, it may choose to redraft the administrative appeal section of the city code. To summarize, Mr. Evans may appeal the administrative determination if it is within fourteen ( 14) days of the issuance of the building permit. If that time period has run, his complaint will be treated as a complaint of non-compliance with the land use decision. Since it appears that the administration has already rejected his complaint, if there is no administrative appeal right remaining, then his only forum would be the courts . If I can provide you with any further ' formation please let me know. - Lawrence J. Warren LJW:as . cc: Mayor Clymer A8 .59 :51 . 4-8-11 , 4-8-11 4-8-11::1 APPLICATIONS: Section shall not create an appeal right, but fi . will be treated as a complaint of noncom- --,,. A Nance with the land use decision. (Ord. f A•';' Applications to Building Department: Appli- p ;;;,>•' cations as specified in Section 4-8-10, except 4168, 8-8-88) appeals of administrative or environmental determinations shall be filed with the Build- B. Applications to Examiner: Appeals from ad- ing Department. ministrative determinations of the City's land use regulation codes and from environmental 1. Within fifteen (15) days of receipt of an determinations required by the Renton envi- application the Building Department shall ronmental ordinance may be enggriev e to the determine whether the application is corn- Hearing Examiner by any person plete. If complete, the application shall be or by any officer, department, board or accepted. If the application is not complete, bureau of the City affected by such deter- the Building Department shall request the mination. applicant to provide additional information as necessary to complete the application. Within 1. Any such appeal shall be filed in writing ten (10) days of receipt of new or additional with the Examiner within the following time information, the Building Department shall limits: accept or reject the application. (Ord. 3454, a. Appeals of a final environmental 7-28 80, amd. Ord. 3592, 12 14 81) determination under the Renton environ- 2. The applicant shall be advised of the date mental ordinance shall be filed within four- of acceptance of the application and of the teen (14) days of publication of notice of such environmental determination. The applicant determination. shall be advised of the date of any public b. Appeals from an administrative hearing at least ten (10) days prior to the sion pursuant to this Chapter shall be filed deci- hearing. within fourteen (14) days of the date that the ' action was taken. '3 ,'The appeal from an administration decision i .implementing a land use decision of the City Council or the Hearing Examiner pursuant to 2. Immediately upon receipt of the notice of this Chapter shall be filed with the Hearing appeal, the Hearing Examiner shall forward Examiner, along with the required fee, within to the officer from whom the appeal is being fourteen (14) days of the administrative deci- taken a copy of the notice of appeal. Upon sion or, if no date of administrative decision receiving such notice, the officer from whom can be determined, within fourteen (14) days the appeal is being taken shall transmit to of the -issuance of any permit which requires the Hearing Examiner all of the records per- interpretation of that land use decision, such taming to the decision being appealed, to- administrative decision being an essential part gether with such additional written reports as of the issuance of the permit, license, or other are deemed pertinent. The Examiner may re- City permission to proceed. Any later request quest additional information from the appli- to interpret, explain, modify, or retract the cant. decision shall not be deemed to be a new ad- ministrative determination creating a new 3. A written notice of the time and place of appeal period for any new third party to the the hearing at which the appeal shall be con- permit. As between the permit holder and the sidered by the Examiner shall be mailed to City, any decision to modify or retract the the applicant, all parties of record in the case, permit shall give the permit holder fourteen and to the.officer from whom the appeal is (14) day appeal period from the date of the taken not less than ten (10) days prior to the action to modify or retract the permit. date of the hearing. (Ord. 3454, 7-28-80) 4. The Examiner may hear and consider any Any claim that an administrative decision pertinent factspertaining to the appeal. The maker has failed to correctly interpret or p enforce a land use decision after the expira- Examiner may affirm the decision or remand tion of the appeal time established in this the case for further proceedings, or it may reverse the decision if the substantial rights Renton City Council Meeting. . . . August 13, 1990. Ralph Evans , 3306 NE 11th Place, Renton, 96056. SUBJECT: Good Shepherd site located at 19th & Shelton Mayor Clymer, Mebers of the Council Last lionaay evening I took up about 20 minutes of your time detailing my research into a traditional definition tor the expression . . . "the property shall be developed. . . " when used in conjunction with zoning ordinances. The Council then turned the entire matter over to the Community Services Committee for resolution. Prior to the vote • however , Mr . Tanner asked you specifically if you agreed with the staff definition. His question was "Does the Good Shepherd conform or does it not conform to the Conditional Use Permit?" Your response, in effect, was "Yes". • • - • During the Community Services Committee meeting the following day, Au2. 7th. I explained how further research had revealed a definition of the word development in the current Renton Municpal Code which removed all doubt as to the intent of the ordinance. The current • Municipal Code, in Title IV, Section 31 . para. 31 (D) defines "Development" as "Any man-made change to improved or unimproved real estate. . . ` This immediately raised another issue. Obviously the definition which you had agreed to the previous day was in conflict with the existing Municipal Code. Was your' statement of Aug. 6th to be regarded as an Administrative Determination: or were you -merely responaing to a question? Was the staff definition of "development" to apply only to this issue or is it intended to be the definition for all similar future actions? Will the Municipal Code be revised to show this new definition? if your statement of agreement with your staff regarding this interpretation was an Administrative Determination, is it not required to be presented in writing, ana at the same time outline applicable appeal provisions? In discussing this matter in committee, Mr . Warren stated that "An applicant would have the right, or the burden, of the zoning and building laws in existence at the time of filing an application for a building- permit. " I think he referred to this as the "Bright Line • . Vesting Rule" and I think I quoted him accurately. T'o me this would imply that even if your intent was to change the definition of the • word development at this time, it would not impact the Good Shepherd • action. The Community Services Committee meeting concluded by asking the City Attorney for an opinion as to the intent of your statement. ' whether it was to be considered an Administrative Determination and, if so what appeal rights were available to the public. Mr . Warren committed to having a response by Friday. August 10. On Friday i picked up a copy of Mr. Warrens memo, and found that instead of answering the question the committee asked, Mr . Warren says that he researched the City Code regarding administrative appeals. He says that he has found that an administrative appeal period of 14 days applies from the date of the issuance of building permits . That, means that in this case. the appeal period ran out on May 4th, over a mont_._- before I asked the questiC ) initial iy. Why was , 'i not given this answer in response to my June 11tn question? But this in turn raises another series of questions : How does one appeal building permits? I have heard of appeals of Administrative Determinations, of ERC determinations , Hearing Examiner decisions , all kinds of Reports and zoning and land use ' issues , but i have never heard or an appeal of a building permit. i thought an appeal always related to a decision or opinion, a written document or some kind, and that the document spelled out what appeal rights were available and over what time period the appeal could be filed. At the Committee of The Whole meeting of April 23rd when it was rirst announces that the building permits had been issued, the subject of an appeal period or appeal rights wasn' t even mentioned. The Committee of The Whole Report, dated May 7th. 1990 contained no reference to the fact that there had been an appeal period, that the appeal period . had expired. or that no appeal had been filed. The Council Minutes , published weekly, generally list all building .permits issued during the previous week. But in ' this case the listings totally omit any mention of the Good Shepherd permits. I have examined the listings from April •16. 1990. to the lastest date available and found nothing related to this project. Even parties of record to this project were not notified of the issuance of a buiidin'g permit. This means that the only possible way for the public to be aware that the permit had been issued would have been to attend the Committee or Tne Whole meeting of April 23rd. and even had they been in attendance they would not have been made aware of any right of appeal . I fail to see any direct relationship between tne expiration or the Conditional Use Permit and the issuance of tne building permit. The Restrictive Covenant clearly states that the property shall be developed within one year . The one year was up on April 24th. and in light of .tne current definition of development, this requirement nas not been met. if you decide that you wish to change the ground rules by means of an Administrative Determination, so be it, but at least the public should be given the proper legal notice and opportunity to appeal . I firmly believe tnat in tnis case tne start overlooked a committed deadline on April 24th, and tnen made a simple mistake pack in June in responding to my question. What has transpired since then is nothing more than an effort to cover it up; an ongoing attempt to justify a mistake. There is no shame in making a mistake, but admitting it and taking the necessary corrective action sometimes takes some strength. Here is an opportunity to give the citizens of the City of Renton reason to believe in their elected officials and their Municipal government. Thank You. • CITY OF RENTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM DATE: August 7, 1990 TO: City Council FROM: Donald Erickson,Zoning.Administrator STAFF CONTACT: Lenora Blauman,Project Manager SUBJECT: Good Shepherd Group Home(010-88) This memorandum is written in response to a letter from Ralph Evans to City Council(dated August 6th) concerning the status of the above-referenced project. Staff has reviewed Mr.Evans'letter today,and has also explored(to the extent possible,given time constraints), the ordinances cited by Mr.Evans. Staff has previously explored Mr.Evans concerns related to"development" generally,and to the specific status of the Good Shepherd Group home. FINDINGS: Staff has determined: 1) "Development",unless otherwise specifically defined,has traditionally been considered as"reasonable progress"toward the implementation of a project;there is no defmition for"development"in City Ordinances or Codes,however,development,by general definition is considered as a continuous process. 2)In the view of staff,given the complexity of this project,the applicant has made reasonable progress by virtue of having: a) duly obtained a building permit,b) duly obtained a funding commitment from HUD (cite Arbius letter);and c)begun the contract bidding activities which are a required prelude to construction activities. Actual construction of the structure and participation in off-site improvements will commence immediately upon receipt of funds. 3)Building Regulations require that the applicant make substantial progress on construction activities within 180 days of the issuance of the permit(in this case by October 20,1990)in order to maintain the permit. If the building permit lapses,then the conditional use permit/reclassification may lapse as well,unless an extension is granted by the City. 4)Activities which have taken place toward the development of this project(e.g.building permits,funding),in the opinion of staff,honor historical ordinance requirements that the applicant shall"commence(d) ...conduct based upon...reclassification"(Ordinance#1472,as amended). 5)The City has not established special conditions for completion of construction or issuance of a certificate of occupancy for this group home. Based upon requirements established by the State of Washington and the City of Renton for improvements/amenities for this special-purpose dwelling(e.g.ramps,safety bars,and other special features to serve the developmentally disabled residents),staff would expect that a minimum period of 18-24 months would be required for completion of construction activities and the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. CONCLUSION: On the basis of the above-described requirements and actual"conduct",staff believe there is no cause or basis to commence reversion at this time. Thank you. _ . August 6, 1990 (- Renton City Council Minutes Page 239 horns, and auto repairs be regulated in addition to "boom boxes", radios, and similar music producers. For the record, Councilman Stredicke announced that Bob Larson from Renton Hill, Eugene Parsons from Rolling Hills, and Blanche Karinin from Maplewood Park, called him to express their support for a noise ordinance. In response to a Council inquiry regarding measurement of noise to be designated in the ordinance, City Attorney Warren said that he would prefer that the decibel rating be designated for a specific distance because this kind of measurement is more precise and more capable of proof. He also stated that measurement equipment would have to be available to the appropriate personnel. In response to an inquiry regarding the City's present noise ordinance, Mr. Warren recommended that Council investigate the factual findings regarding the regulation of noise prior to making a decision on whether to amend the City's present noise ordinance or to establish a new ordinance. Councilman Tanner said that he had requested previously that staff contact San Antonio, Texas, regarding the noise meter program in that City. Mr. Warren said he would obtain that information for Council. Council indicated an interest in investigating decibel meters as a measurement devise to be used for enforcement of a noise ordinance. Versie Vaupel commented that even without a device to measure sound, this ordinance could be used as a warning by a police officer to enforce a complaint against a violator. Ralph Evans, 3306 NE 11th Place, Renton, commented that even with the use of decibel meter readers, a distance measurement would be required. Councilman Tanner explained that the decibel reading is a pressure reading, and is based on a scale that is supposed to approximate the average human ear. Dennis Anderson, 3300 Lake Washington Boulevard North, Renton, indicated a preference that the ordinance include a time restriction such as, no noise after 10:00 p.m., because he did not believe this ordinance as proposed would be enforceable. Sandy Webb, 430 Mill Avenue South, Renton, commented that he felt this ordinance would be very difficult to enforce even with decibel meters because a meter is something you use when you have source and a target. Councilman Edwards indicated that he would like this ordinance to be enforceable against noise levels at home or in a car and expressed his endorsement of a decibel meter. In response to a question from Marge Richter regarding whether the present noise ordinance applies to holiday noise, City Attorney Warren said he would check the Washington Administrative Code (WAC) to obtain this information for Ms. Richter. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY MATHEWS, COUNCIL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. CARRIED. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY TANNER, COUNCIL REFER THIS MATTER TO THE PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE. CARRIED. Appointment: Executive Mayor Clymer introduced Jay Covington, Executive Assistant to the Mayor, Assistant who began his employment with the City on August 1, 1990. Mr. Covington was formerly Assistant City Manager for the City of Vancouver. AUDIENCE COMMENT Ralph Evans, 3306 NE 11th Place, Renton, referred to his previous inquiries Citizen Comment: Good ' to the City Council regarding the lack of City action on a zoning reversion Shepherd Group Home for the Good Shepherd group home property on NE 19th Street, and called (NE 19th Street), R-010- attention to Ordinance No. 4212 which states in part: 88 "Good Shepherd of Washington agrees that failure to develop the property according to the terms of the Conditional Use Permit within one year, ...shall cause the property to revert to its prior R-1 zoning classification." Mr. Evans requested that the City Attorney be asked to evaluate the ordinance, determine whether Mr. Evans' view of this statement is accurate, and if it is not, determine what the interpretation of the ordinance will be. August 6, 1990 - Renton City Council Minutes Page 240 Councilwoman Zimmerman announced that the Community Services Committee is addressing Mr. Evans concerns regarding the Good Shepherd Property at a meeting on August 7, 1990 at 2:30 p.m. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY EDWARDS, COUNCIL REFER ALL OF THE SUBJECT MATTER DISCUSSED TONIGHT AND THE APPROPRIATE PERMITS ISSUED FOR THE GOOD SHEPHERD GROUP HOME TO THE COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMITTEE FOR REVIEW AND REPORT BACK TO THE COUNCIL. CARRIED. Citizen Comment: Huson June Huson, 11030 SE 76th Street, Renton, reported that construction on - Renton 91 Apartments, Renton 91, an apartment complex near NE 44th, began about two months NE 44th Street ago, and there have been problems with dust, noise and removal of large madrona trees. Ms. Huson said that she has talked to City Building Official Ron Nelson regarding this matter. Mayor Clymer reported that Mr. Nelson wrote a letter to the builders, Pacific Residential Properties, which required the following conditions: 1) Work and road areas creating dust must be dampened as necessary to control dust; 2) Large rock be installed at each entrance/exit to the property to reduce tracking of dirt onto streets; and 3) The streets be swept prior to flushing in order to reduce silting of the drainage system. President Mathews questioned whether developers of Renton 91 had filed a tree plan with the City to preserve vegetation and asked the administration to assure the company's compliance with the plan. She also requested that the possibility of noise violation be looked into. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY EDWARDS, COUNCIL REFER THE MATTER OF CITY REQUIREMENTS FOR PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT TO THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE FOR REVIEW AND REPORT BACK TO COUNCIL. CARRIED. CONSENT AGENDA Items on the consent agenda are adopted by one motion which follows the listing. Council President Mathews pointed out to Council that item 6.g. is concurrence with the Mayor's appointment of Sam Chastain as Park Superintendent, and that the date in item 6.1. should be August 20, 1990, not August 13. Ms. Mathews also announced that item 6.m., CAG-074-89, underground fuel storage tank removal, has been removed from the Consent Agenda. Councilman Edwards requested that item 6.d., 1989 Audit Report, be removed for separate consideration. Claim: Goggins, CL-44- Claim for damages in the amount of $98.84 filed by Ray Goggins, 1300 Eagle 90 Ridge Drive S., #P1110, Renton, for tire/wheel cover damage alleged caused by City negligence in failing to provide ample lane clearance for negotiating right hand turn at Williams and Grady Way (7/13/90). Refer to City Attorney and insurance service. Claim: U.S. West Claim for damages in the amount of $200.00 filed by U.S. West Communications, CL-45- Communications, 1600 7th Avehue, Room 1811, Seattle, for damage to 90 pedestal alleged struck by a City operated mower (7/16/90). Refer to City Attorney and insurance service, Claim: U.S. West Claim for damages in the amount of $500.00 filed by U.S. West Communications, CL-46- Communications, 1600 7th Avenue, Room 1811, Seattle, for damage to buried 90 cable alleged struck by a City operated backhoe in the vicinity of Jones Avenue NE and NE 24th Street (7/02/90). Refer to City Attorney and insurance service. H & HR: King County Housing and Human Services Division submitted Citizens Advisory Sexual Assault Resource Committee recommendation on the King County Sexual Assault Resource Center Mid-Year Budget Center's mid-year budget request in the amount of $5,000.00. Refer to Request Community Services Committee, H & HR: Community Housing and Human Services Division submitted request for resolution Development Block Grant authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to enter into Interlocal Cooperative Interlocal Agreement with Agreement with King County for Community Development Block Grant King County funds. Refer to Ways and Means Committee. '` CITY OF RENTON Parks'and Recreation Earl Clymer, Mayor Sam Chastain,Director August 6, 1990 Mr. Ed Ball, President 'Good Shepherd of Washington 13817 171st Ave NE Redmond, WA 98052 Dear Ed: Correspondence was received in this office August 3, 1990 from Mr. Bob Arbios of HUD concerning the Good Shepherd of Washington projects I and II. In his letter Mr.Arbios stated that the projects are making their way through the firm commitment review process and completion is expected in another two to three weeks. He also stated that the issue of church and state has been resolved to HUD's satisfaction. This update is welcome news, and has been shared with the Citizens Advisory Committee for Housing and Human Services. HUD's statement that it will take another two or three weeks to complete the process does raise concerns about the scheduling of the project. The Department of Planning/BuildingfPublic Works has reminded me that the permit for the 19th Street site will expire 180 days from April 20, 1990 unless substantial work on the site has been effected. Generally, a minimum requirement for `substantial work' is having the foundation installed. I trust that progress on the 19th Street project will be sufficient to meet this time limit. Please call me at 235-2724 if you have any questions. I'm looking forward, as I'm sure you are, to HUD's final approval. Sincerely, ?Nov,. S 1.c.V1 Ron Shelley, Coordinator Housing and Human Services 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2560 • Renton City Council Meeting August 6th. 1990 Ralph Evans . 3306 NE 11th Place, Renton WA. 98056 Mayor Clymer. Members of the City Council ; I intended tonight to respond to your Administrative Report of July 23rd, but it suddenly occurred to me that I don' t really understand what is going on. I have some kind of a problem here and I don' t know what it is. On June 11th, I asked a question regarding the lack of City action on a zoning reversion. Maybe I didn' t phrase the question clearly, or maybe I wasn' t specific enough. I just don' t know. What I do know is that since that night, nothing of substance has been accomplished. I feel as if I ' m in some kind of a game where I ' m the only player who doesn' t know the rules. I have. seen several of your Administrative ' Reports containing memos from Mr. Nyberg or Ms. Guttmann. In addition, 1 met with Ms. Blauman and Mr. Erickson on the subject. I feel that somehow the entire Public Works/ Planning Departments are spending an inordinate amount of time trying to define the words "develop" and/or "development". For example, Ms. Guttmann, in ,her memo of July 11, states -in part "The City has not traditionally defined "development" as requiring construction activities to be completed. . . "etc. Ms Blauman, at our July 24th meeting, wanted to define "develop",' and Mr . Erickson suggested that maybe I ' should poll the Council members as to their interpretation or intent when they voted for the ordinance. Not a bad idea, but what is required is a definition that can be pinned down, not a series of opinions. This paper debate has been going on for two months now and I feel that I am no nearer getting the City to act than I was back then. What . am I doing wrong? Why is this issue repeatedly being sent 'back to the Public Works/Planning Dept for their opinion as to the intent? Surely this is a legal issue. We are trying to eff.ablish the interpretation of a phrase used in a legal document. • The statement in question appears in Restrictive Covenants which are included in City of Renton ordinance No. 4212, and reads, in part, as follows : "Good Shepherd of Washington agrees that failure to • develop the property according to the terms of the Conditional Use Permit within one year, shall cause the property to revert to its prior R-1 zoning classification. " The word "property" is used twice in the statement and used in this context can only relate to real property. Be that as it may, Ms. Guttmann states that "The City of Renton has not traditionally defined "development" as requiring construction activities to be completed. " Thats true, but neither does the City define "development" in any other way; it just isn' t defined at all . In trying to research a traditional definition, I went back as far as Ordinance No. 1472 dated Dec. 8,• 1953, which states in Section XXII (3) ( c) . and I paraphrase : "Any ordinance granting and providing such change in use or reclassification of property shall remain effective for a period of one year unless • the property owner has commenced a change in use during said one -year period. If no change or • use has commenced within said time, the ordinance granting such change shall be null and void, in which case the •. . . . classification in existence immediately prior shall become effective again' as to such property. " That was aster ordinance #1472 was amended by ordinances #1542 dated • A.pril _17. 1955 and #1683 dated June 1.7, 1958. All in all I went through at least 15 ordinances looking for "tradition" . The only one 1 found to be even more definitive is ordinanace "#1703, dated November 18, 1958. This ordinance reads basically the - same as #1472 as amended, but adds the qualifier, " . . shall remain effective for a period of one year from the effective date of such ordinance. " More importantly, #1703 also includes the statement ; "The term "commenced a change of use" means (a) the physical alteration requiring a building permit; or (b) substantial evidence of occupancy, operation, usage or conduct based on such reclassification. " Surely this then is the traditional application of reversionary • clauses and the traditional intent of how they were to be applied. Ordinance #1703 goes on to define the parameters and conditions for requesting and for granting extensions to the one year limit. If we were to apply the ordinance #1703 definition to the Good Shepherd rezone it 'would be obvious to all concerned that no change of use had occurred and that the one year period had expired on April 24th 1990. -I looked through what I believe to be all the applicable cross- referenced ordinances for any amending language or repeals "and found ordinance #1921 dated Nov. ' 21 , 1961 which repeals those very Paragraphs I retered to. #1921 eliminated the reversionary clause from the Ci y-wide zoning ordinance. Mr . Warren referenced both #1472 and #1703 in ordinance #3598 dated January 4, 1982 as examples of reversion clauses. They then, established the precedent or definition of "change of use" or the word "develop" as used in this instance. Mr. Warren, in his memo to Mayor Clymer dated June 15, 1990, states : " If the city has made a determination that the time period has run for the Good Shepherd development, then it must rezone the property to its prior designation. In order, to do that, and to ensure compliance with the state zoning laws, the City must hold a public hearing and formally downzone the property by means of a zoning ordinance. " In the case of the Good Shepherd, a specific reversionary. clause was included as a restrictive covenant, and ordinances #1472 and #1703 set the tradition way back in the ' 50' s. We all know the intent was that physical change to the property was to occur within the one year period, and that hasn' t happened. I would like to see some progress made in this . 1 see no benefit whatsoever in this question going back again to the Public Works/ Planning Dept for further review. If for no other reason than to establish a, definition for future use, I think this question ought to be resolved here and now. 1 think the Administration or the Council should ask the City Attorney whether my evaluation of the ordinance #4212 is accurate or not, and it not, what the interpretation of the ordinance is tb be. I don' t know all the rules, but I do know that the City can expedite some matters on some occasions. For example, I have a copy of a letter from an official at HUD, dated April 16, 1990 and addressed to Ms . Nancy L. Mathews , President, Renton City Council . The letter begins "Dear Ms. Mathews ; As requested by Ron Drews of Good Shepherd Lutheran Home of the West, this letter . is to provide you with a status of the subject Section 202 project. The project includes a site located at N. E. 19th Street in Renton. This site, we understand faces a conditional use deadline shortly. " There is no date stamp to indicate when the letter was received, but within 4 days the Building Permits were issued to the Good Shepherd. Now, that' s efficiency ! Another example. At the Council meeting of June 11 , 1990, the same evening that I originally raised this question. Mr. Stredicke expressed his concern regarding noise levels from car stereos in Renton. He suggested an ordinance be considered that would give the City the power to impose a fine if noise levels exceeded certain set limits. Great idea. I ' m all for it. But the question arises ; "How did his question get to a Public Hearing tonight. together with a draft of the ordinance, while my question is still back in the starting gate? • We are now 3 1/2 months beyond the April 24 deadline and still no "change of use" has occurred. Again I ask the Administration and Council to honor the commitment made to the citizens and immediately take the action necessary to cause the Good Shepherd property located at 19th and Shelton to revert to its prior R-1 zoning classification. Thank you. Ordinances reviewed include the following : lJlos. 1472 1628 _ 1720 2522 3637 1542 1683 1901 2630 4261 1612 1703 1921 3050 3526 August 6. 1990 - Renton City Council Minutes Page 245 Community Event: Councilman Stredicke noted that the Interurban Center for the Arts in Interurban Center for the Auburn has published a 1990 Community Arts Calendar that includes a Arts listing of art events offered by the City of Renton. He requested that the administration contact this organization to commend them for this effort. • ADMINISTRATIVE Referred 6/11/90 - Petition submitted in support of Talbot Road REPORT Comprehensive Plan Amendment. Letter from Mayor Clymer to Roy Fornier Comprehensive Plan: dated July 23, 1990, summarizing that in January a Community Profile Talbot Road Private discussing existing land uses, infrastructure capabilities, environmental Amendment constraints, and social/economic factors was distributed to the public; and the City held a workshop to initiate a dialogue with residents to register their concerns about future development in the Talbot Road area. He detailed further that since February, the scope of services for infrastructure analysis has been approved, alternative density scenarios have been developed for impact analysis, a synthesis of the issues raised by the community has been written, a market study has been prepared by the applicant, and property owners in the area were sent a copy of the issues paper. Mayor Clymer explained that ultimately the desisions on the Comprehensive Plan and development proposal are made by the City Council in an open forum after the Planning Commission has held a public hearing on the matter. He said that the amendment of the Comprehensive Plan and development review process offers several opportunities for public participation. H & HR: 1990 Block Referred 6/25/90 - Council request for clarification of Block Grant funding. Grant Funding Memorandum dated July 20, 1990, to Community Development Administrator John Webley from Housing and Human Services Acting Coordinator Ron Shelley referred to the January 22, 1990, Ways and Means Committee report concerning staff recommendations that $8,200.00 surplus 1989 Housing Assistance funds, $950.00 surplus 1989 Planning & Administration funds, $887.00 surplus 1989 Rental Rehab funds, and $54,316.00 (previously allocated to the E-Street Apartment Acquisition and Renovation project) be reallocated to the North Highlands Neighborhood Center Renovation Phase II Interior. The Ways and Means Committee report also included two administrative matters regarding the City's Block Grant dollars: 1) $1,876.00 of HUD's reduction of the King County Block Grant funds was passed on to the City of Renton, and Staff recommended that this reduction be accomplished by reducing funds slated for the E-Street apartment project. 2) $1,072.00 of 1990 Planning & Administration allocation of $12,045.00 be reallocated to the North Highlands walkway project to complete final design and engineering. Rezone: Good Shepherd Referred 7/9/90 - Versie Vaupel's inquiry regarding issuance of building Group Home (NE 19th permits or use of City funds on the Good Shepherd project prior to Street), R-010-88 determination of the issue of church and state separation. Memorandum to Mayor Clymer from Planning/Building/Public Works Administrator Lynn Guttmann dated July 17, 1990, stated that all requirements necessary to issue a building permit were completed by Good Shepherd, fees were paid, and a building permit was issued on April 20, 1990 for the Good Shepherd group home property on NE 19th Street. Rezone: Good Shepherd Referred 7/16/90 - Ralph Evans inquiry regarding building permits for Good Group Home (NE 19th Shepherd group home. Mr. Evans questioned violation by City of terms of Street),,R-010-88 restrictive covenants and resolution of separation of church and state issue. Memorandum to Mayor Clymer from Administrator Lynn Guttmann dated July 19, 1990, stated that Mr. Evans was scheduled to discuss his concerns with staff and that a report on that meeting will be forthcoming. Memorandum from City Attorney Warren stated that review of current resolutions of the directors of Good Shepherd with reference to the practice of religion in their group home revealed: 1) Individuals would be selected for the home without regard to religious affiliation. 2) There would be no compulsory church attendance and management of the home would make transportation available to those wishing to attend church irrespective of their religious affiliations. 3) Religious symbols would be kept on a voluntary basis only in living areas of residents. • . J ' August 6. 1990 ._' Renton City Council Minutes Pane 246 Mr. Warren said that he would advocate that the City defer to HUD in making the initial decision on whether the operating characteristics of the home involved unnecessary church-state entanglement. Public Works: Citizen Referred 7/16/90 - Council relayed a citizen complaint that the City had Complaint Regarding been slow to respond to a reported water leak on July 14, 1990. Water Leak Memorandum to Administrator Lynn Guttmann from Maintenance Manager Jack Crumley dated July 23, 1990, stated the following: 1. 7:00 a.m., July 14, 1990, the Police Dispatcher called Greg Seegmiller, water maintenance standby person, regarding a water leak at 116 Meadow Avenue North. 2) 7:15 a.m., Mr. Seegmiller arrived at the site of the leak and investigated the problem. He found a small leak on the service line and determined that it was safe to leave the leak unattended until Monday, June 16, 1990. He spoke to individuals in the house and explained the decision he had made. 3) On Monday, July 16, 1990, maintenance crews returned to repair the leak. Planning: Bockelmann Referred 7/16/90 - Ruth Bockelmann request for change in area of influence Request for City line between Renton and Bellevue. Letter to Ruth Bockelmann from City Boundary Revision, SE Clerk Marilyn Petersen explaining that on July 16, 1990, the Renton City 60th to SE 69th Streets Council approved a motion concurring in the recommendation of both the City of Renton Planning Department and the City of Bellevue Planning Department not to change the area of influence line between the two cities at this time. Ms. Petersen also explained to Ms. Bockelmann that the Council authorized the City of Renton Planning Department to contact her to discuss the urban growth process, specifically, establishment of the sphere of influence boundary. Citizen Comment: Referred 7/16/90 - Jeanne and James McElroy's inquiry regarding the McElroy - Overhead undergrounding of power lines. Letter to Mr. and Mrs. McElroy from Mayor Power Lines Clymer dated July 19, 1990, explained that the only way power lines can be undergrounded at the present time is through a Limited Utility District in which property owners in an area agree to tax themselves to make a specific improvement. Mayor Clymer also stated that City research indicates that the potential impact of an electromagnetic field around transmission lines is greatly reduced when residential units are located a distance away from power lines. King County: Vehicle Referred 7/16/90 - Administration to draft a letter to King County Council Registration Fee in support of $15.00 vehicle registration fee. Letter to Councilmember Lois North, Chair, King County Council, from Mayor Clymer dated July 25, 1990, urged that the King County Council enact the $15.00 per year vehicle registration fee, and stated that the City of Renton supports passage of the fee for the following reasons: 1) Funding of transportation-related improvements is a critical issue facing municipalities within King County. 2) Of the local options provided in the State transportation legislation, the proposed $15.00 vehicle registration fee is gentlest to consumers and is the easiest to enforce. ADJOURNMENT MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY TANNER, COUNCIL ADJOURN. CARRIED. Time 10:20 p.m. ?), . ,,,:, MARILYN J. ERSEN, CMC, City Clerk Recorder: Nancy Mills 08/06/90 • MAYOR'S ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT August 6, 1990 RESPONSES FROM CITY COUNCIL INQUIRIES AND CITIZEN CONCERNS • June 11, 1990 Letter and petition submitted in support of Talbot Road Private Comprehensive Plan Amendment. June 25, 1990 Councilman Stredicke requested clarification of newspaper article regarding Renton's portion of King County Consortium CDBG Program. July 9, 1990 Versie Vaupel questioned issuance of building permits or use of City money on the Good Shepherd project prior to determination on the issue of church and state separation. July 16, 1990 Ralph Evans questioned issuance of building permits for Good Shepherd group home. He questioned violation by City of terms of covenants which required development of the property within one year, and has not resolved the issue of separation of church and state by HUD. He urged the City to contact HUD and not Good Shepherd for information regarding the issue of separation of church and state. He also complained of slow response to his letters from Administration, and pointed out inaccuracies in Mr. Nyberg's letter regarding time allowances for development after approval of rezone. July 16, 1990 Council relayed citizen complaint of report to Police Department in early morning of 7/14/90 of heavy water leak, but there was no response until 4:00 p.m. July 16, 1990 Council adopted motion that sphere of influence line between Renton and Bellevue not be changed at this time (Bockelmann request). City Clerk will write to Mrs. Bockelmann. July 16, 1990 Letter from James and Jeanne McElroy, 1160 Aberdeen Avenue NE, Renton, reported construction of 800 apartment units in 900 block of Aberdeen Avenue NE, and noting potential safety hazards to residents living near power lines, asked why Puget Power is not required to underground lines. July 16, 1990 Council made a motion to refer the matter of the $15 vehicle registration fee to the Administration to draft a letter to the King County Council in support of the tax. CITY OF RENTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM DATE: July 31, 1990 TO: Mayor Earl Clymer FROM: Lynn Gun lanning/Building/Public Works Administrator STAFF CONTACT: Donald Erickson, Principal Planner Lenora Blauman, Senior Planner SUBJECT: Good Shepherd, NE 19th Street/Shelton Avenue File No. 010-88 This is written as a follow-up to our memorandum of July 25th reporting on Ralph Evans' questions with respect to the above-referenced project. Specifically, as noted in that memorandum, staff has conducted research into Mr. Evans statement that "Kenneth Nyberg and John Morris promised the City Council that issues of separation of church and state would be resolved before building permits"would be authorized. Staff reported that minutes/tapes of the May 14, 1990 session of City Council indicate that Council made an inquiry concerning the "church/state issue". Records of the June 4, 1990 City Council meeting indicate that a memorandum reporting on issue status was submitted by Kenneth Nyberg to the Council (copies attached). Materials which had been requested of the applicant concerning the church/state issue were duly provided to the City, resulting in continuing commitment of the City to the project. There is no indication in Council records or correspondence that Mr. Nyberg made any commitment to withhold or withdraw building permits, nor that the Council so mandated, on either May 14th or June 4th, or at any other meeting of which we are aware. If you have other questions, or would like additional information, please contact Donald Erickson or Lenora Blauman at 235-2550. Thank you. • ' ;=1990 ,nton City Council Minutes `, Page 172 ADMINISTRATIVE Referred 5/7/90 - Council inquiry regarding growth issues related to the 1% REPORT real estate excise tax. Memorandum from Sam Chastain, Park King County: 1% Real Superintendent, stated that the suburban cities would be eligible to compete Estate Excise Tax for funding in two of the three funding categories, Urban Acquisition and Stewardship and Maintenance. The Regional Acquisition would be solely controlled by the King County Open Space Committee for acquiring regional facilities or Iand. Local agencies would.be allowed to submit acquisition and facilities proposals for consideration by this committee. He stated advantages of the proposed tax plan would be (1) opportunity to increase the presentation of Open Space on a regional and local basis; (2) provision of a funding source for specialized maintenance and rehabilitation of parks, trails, natural zones, etc; (3) inclusion of a sunset clause; and (4) exemption of the first $125,000 of the purchase price of a home. Disadvantages would be (1) fairness issue of imposition of a new tax on people who purchase real estate, especially should•the exemption clause not be placed on the tax; (2) new or higher fees and taxes in the future; (3) possible adverse impact on any future ' bond issue by the City. Space Needs: City Hall Referred 5/14/90 - Inquiry from Mark Niemi, 23512 264th Avenue SE, Parking Maple Valley, regarding Renton Public Library parking. Letter from Mayor Clymer to Mr. Niemi stated that the problem is currently being studied by the City Parking Lot Committee. He noted that the designation of an additional 34 parking stalls for public use only in the Library parking lot should be adequate parking for Renton residents using the Library. Mr. Niemi was reminded that if he parks in alternate locations, he should be aware of the current posted parking limits and expected changes during the summer recreation season. • Rezone: Good Shepherd Referred 5/14/90 - Council inquiry regarding question of church/state issue Group Home (NE 19th with the Good Shepherd Group Home: Memorandum from Ken Nyberg, Street) R-010-88 Community Development Director, stated that the issue has not been resolved and the Housing and Human Services Citizens Advisory Committee has requested that the status of this project be discussed with Mr. Ed Ball, President of Good Shepherd Home, and other concerned board members as well as HUD, King County and Bellevue. Annexation: North Soos Referred 5/14/90 - Council inquiry regarding consultant selection panel for Creek (Fairwood) North Soos Creek project. Memorandum from Ken Nyberg, Director of Community Development, named the following as the consultant team for the public information program: Bernadene Dochnahl, Renton'Advisory Committee; Meg Meier, North Soos Creek Citizens Advisory Board; Randy Berg, Parks Department; Rebecca Lind, Community Development Department; and Fred Fortine, Community Development Department. The selection panel for the North Renton Arterial Facilitation Project includes Lynn Guttmann, Gary Norris, and Mel Wilson from the Public Works Department. Public Works: NE 6th Referred 5/14/90 - Council inquiry regarding NE 6th Street as access to Street, Crown Point II apartment complex. Memorandum from Mayor Clymer via Lynn Guttmann, Public Works Director, stated that NE 6th Street only has a 30 foot right-of- way from 90 feet west of Queen Avenue NE to Union Avenue NE because the existing north 30 feet right-of-way was dedicated when the property was platted. Even though the 30 feet is unacceptable, it is all the City has at the present time until the south one-half is developed 'or platted, at which time the developers of Crown Point II will be required to dedicate an additional 30 feet. Executive Session MOVED BY MATHEWS, SECONDED BY ZIMMERMAN, COUNCIL CONVENE INTO EXECUTIVE SESSION TO DISCUSS LITIGATION ISSUES. CARRIED. Time 11:47 p.m. ADJOURNMENT • Council reconvened into regular session; roll was called; all members were present. MOVED BY MATHEWS, SECONDED BY NELSON, COUNCIL ADJOURN THE MEETING. CARRIED. Time 12:36 a.m. MARILYN F RSEN, CMC, City Clerk Recorder: Sandra Wales 06/04/90 CITY OF RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM • • `'// May 18, 1990 DATE: / May C1yar � Director, • SUBJECT: . ;Response to-Council Inquiry Staff Contact: ,...John Morris, Coordinator Housing & Human Services Division (2553) • Question from Mr. Stredicke, "Has.the City been assured that the issue of separation of church and state regarding Good Shepherd Group Home funding been resolved?" The answer is no. A letter (see attached copy) has been delivered to Mr. Ed Ball which seeks answers regarding not only the religious issues, but several other issues as well. Copies of the letter have also been sent to HUD, King County, and Bellevue because they have similar concerns to ours. • I am expecting a response to the letter by the end of the month. Regardless of the response, the Housing and Human Services Citizens Advisory Committee has requested the opportunity to discuss the status of the projects with Mr. Ed Ball and other Good•Shepherd of Washington board members. After that meeting, the Citizens Advisory Committee will either reaffirm their support of the projects, request more information or recommend withdrawal of support for the projects. If you have any further questions you may contact John Morris at 235-2553. CITY OF Rti,NTON .11. • COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Houslnz and Human Resources -- John Morris,-Coordinator May 1, 1990 Ed Ball, President • Good.Shepherd of .Washington '13817 171st Ave. NE Redmond, WA 98052 • Dear Ed, As we have discussed, the City of Renton has questions related to the two group home enprThese jects your organization has been, and continues to.be, in the process of developing in Rquestions are primarily programmatic in nature ns tired sincere necessitate youd dwere allocated project by recent changes in your leadership, and by the length of time that h P development funds. I is suggesting siing the ca following process to address the questions, and resolve any issues that they l of ur answers raise. All significant questions will be put in writing in eview yourlresponses and for d likewise be in writing, in a letter addressed•to me. the responses and askk for man clarifications as needed. A staff report will be prepared for use by Resources.Citizens Advisory Committee. The Committee response tor previously letterywrlssedaa desire to t discuss the group home projects with you, and your opportunity for that discussion to occur. Issue: Religion Has your Board acted in an official capacity in agreeing to the following provisions? In addition to, and not in substitution for, other provisions of this Agreement regarding the l provision of management services for Good Shepherd Home, the management agent: institution 1. represents that it is, or may be deemed to be, a reliius or us pu pones hichtis supervised or or organization, or an organization operated for religio controlled.by or in connection with a religious or denominational institution or organization; 2. agrees on behalf of itself, its employees, agents and subcontractors, that, in connection with such management services: • oyee or plicant for a, it basisdt any yment on the , of religion and to persons on the basis of religion. b, it will not discriminate against any person applying for residency on the basis of religion. and will not limit such residency or give preference to persons on the basis of religion; 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2553 ,-..,...r.,,rin f7ns) 235-2513 Ed Ball May 1, 1990 Page 2 conduct no religious c, it will provide no religious instruction or counselling, and exert no.other worship or services, engage in no religious proselytiLlflg, rovision..of such;.management services; and. •religious influence in the':p. . • . d. the facilities managed in.whole or.in 'part under. this for rthose Symbols or tain no sectarian or religious symbols or decorations,: except • decorations posted by each resident in his or her immediate living area. If the Board has officially acted on these provisions, can you provide the City with a certified copy of the Board minutes documenting that action? me Based on the keynote address at the Annual.Mnood Shepits, herd Lutheran on plays a o f o the West held March 17, 1990, contained in Good Shepherd s role in Good Shepherd Group Homes. Can you explain ho the save o are'waealethat role.reconcile its religious role with HUD and Block Grant requirements thaw Issue: Revisions of By-Laws Does Good Shepherd Lutheran Home of the West want to change the existing By-Laws of Good Shepherd of Washington? could you please highlight the changes and provide..a brief explanation of why the • If yes, change is proposed, and what you anticipate:its::effects•will be _ • • Your application indicates that "The Board is composed of. JQcal fella., who with the help of ent." Local the sponsor, Good Shepherd Lutheran from our perspe Home oct ve. are Please'guiding indi ateehowmthis element will representation on the Board is vital fro continue to be incorporated into your organization. • Issue: Service to Renton Residents Your original application for Block Grants funds stated in response to the question: "Does the proposed project target Renton as its primary service area?" that "Case management, Department of Developmental Disabilities makes all referrals to the provider, in this caWeG4o Good Shepherd. Although we don't have absolute control of residents s acceptedw bei givenhe home,priority." do every thing within our power to ensure that Is this still an accurate statement of your intentions? 'Explain. Issue: Day to Day Management of the Facility I to the question: . Indicate who'on your staff'Will:be'resp ensibl homerthi bs project, and • response list their qualification. You.provided the following statement. . .. i .. the Habilitation Coord}nator will be in charge. 'That person'uqu fficat10 arsrr.ele antte 's eg ce i in a field related tot:tfie. position requirements with'a•'minim MR/DD field, or a Bachelor's Degree in the field related to the position requirements with a minimum of four years relevant experience in MR/DD field." • Is this still an accurate statement of your intentions?' Explain. . • • Ed Ball • May 1, 1990 • Page 3 Issue: Client Profile • • Staff, Council, and citizens were repeatedly told these homes would be for the severely developmentally disabled. • Is this still the case? Explain, if necessary, and include your working definition of the severely developmentally disabled. If I can be of any help in working with you on your responses to these questions, please give me a call. • . • • • •Sincerely, • (.2 ohn Morris ` 7 • • • John/goodshep • • • . • JUL 2 3 990 CITY OF RENTON MEMORANDUM �: �,l.y �,r•,. . • • DATE: July 17 , 1990 • • Mayor Earl Clymer FROM: Lynn 4- lG a , Director Building/Pla ing/Public Works SUBJECT: Mayor's Ref #90-088/Versie Vaupel/7-9-90 Good Shepherd Lutheran 4001 NE 19th St. Building Permit B-15619 With regard to the above referenced issue, please be advised that the application was received on July 27 , 1988 . All requirements necessary to issue a building permit were completed by the applicant. The following fees (as required by City Code) were paid and a permit was issued on April 20 , 1990: • Building Permit Fee $ 814 . 50 Drainage Fee 54 . 00 Plan 'Check Fee 529 . 42 Energy Code Fee 13 . 50 Total $1, 411 . 42 I P • 7 - JUL 2 3 1990 CITY OF RENTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM DATE: July 19, 1990 TO: Mayor Earl Clymer FROM: Lynn GIB tt!kr n, irector STAFF CONTACT: Donald Erickson, Principal Planner Lenora Blauman, Senior Planner SUBJECT: Good Shepherd Group Homes This memorandum is written in response to your referral of July 17th regarding a letter from Ralph Evans (dated July 9, 1990) concerning the Good Shepherd Group Homes. A meeting with Mr. Evans is being scheduled to discuss his questions and concerns directly for the purpose of assisting Mr. Evans in understanding development standards and regulations affecting these projects. Following that meeting, a memorandum will be prepared for the purpose of reporting the discussion. This memorandum will be transmitted to your office to be shared with the City Council as appropriate. If you have questions or would like additional information, please contact Mr. Erickson or Ms. Blauman at 235-2550. evans719/mr °>"1--") , CITY JF REN ON Office of the City Attorney Earl Clymer, Mayor RYCLXVED July 23, 1990 JUL 2 3 1990 ,,, €gor`b Cj-uiit TO: Mayor Earl Clymer y/ Renton City Council FROM: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney RE : Good Shepherd and Separation of Church and State Dear Mr. Mayor and Council Members : I have had the opportunity to review the most current resolutions of the directors of Good 'Shepherd with reference to the practice of religion in their group home . Those resolutions revealed, amongst other things, the following: 1 . Individuals would be selected for the home without regard to their religious affiliation . 2 . There would be no compulsory church attendance by the residents , and the management of the home would make transportation available to those wishing to attend church irrespective of their religious affiliations . 3 . Religious symbols would be kept on a voluntary basis only in the living areas of the individual residents . The accompanying letter did cause me some concern . In that letter there was an expression of .intent to teach Christian ideals to the members of the home . However, on closer reflection, those Christian ideals are rather social mores . For example, the letter cited teaching that one should not kill or steal . Those mores , to the extent they can be called religious , cut across all religions, and in fact would appear to be generally accepted as the difference between right and wrong, without regard to religion. Although the letter was awkwardly worded, I do not believe that teaching these ideals can be said to be a furtherance of Christianity, and therefore should not involve unnecessary church- state entanglement. I have not had an opportunity to contact HUD to ascertain what their ruling will be concerning these new resolutions . However, I have advocated, throughout, that the city defer to HUD in making the initial . decision on whether or not the operating characteristics of the home involved unnecessary church-state r , Mayor Earl Clymer & 1 .ton City Council July 23, 1990 Page 2 entanglement. My independent analysis would show that they do not. If my contact with HUD reveals anything of importance I will again communicate with the council . if I can answer any further questions you might have please feel free to contact me. Lawrence J. Warren LJW: as . A8 . 58 : 65 . 00 CITY JF RENTOvJ Parks and Recreation Earl Clymer, Mayor Sam Chastain,Director PLANNING OIVISIOr` CITY OF RENTON August 9, 1990 AUG 1 0 1990 RECEIVED Mr. Jack Lee 23205 49th Ave. Spanaway, WA 98387 Subject: Good Shepherd of Washington projects I and II: 19th Street Site Dear Mr. Lee, Questions from the audience concerning the above referenced project arose at the August 6th meeting of the Renton City Council. The questions pertained to whether or not the project has progressed enough to satisfy the conditions of the building permit, and thus whether or not there should be a reversion in the zoning. At a more fundamental level, the definition of`development'was also questioned. At present, the City administration supports staffs view that the project has satisfactorily progressed. The Council referred the questions to the Community Services Committee which met on Tuesday August 7th. Due to the short notice of the meeting, representatives of Good Shepherd of Washington were unable to be notified to attend the Community Services Meeting to assist in addressing the issues. The Committee has directed the City attorney to advise how to proceed with the issue of reversion of zoning. Please be advised that there will be a City Council meeting on August 13 at 7:30PM at which further discussion will occur relating to these issues. Your attendance at this meeting is welcome. Sincerely, Ron Shelley, Coordina r Housing and Human Services PC: Mr. Ed Ball Mr. Ralph Evans "Ms. Lenora Blauman JLee8-9 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2560 Tuly �, 1990 --_.enton City Council Minutes Page 232 Vouchers Ways and Means Committee Chairman Keolker-Wheeler presented a report stating that the Committee recommended approval of payment claims checks #71569 through 71973 and six wire transfers totaling $1,116,329.57; and payroll vouchers #89392 through 89909 and 222 direct deposits in the amount of $789,293.61. MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY EDWARDS, COUNCIL CONCUR IN APPROVAL OF VOUCHERS. CARRIED. NEW BUSINESS Councilman Edwards said that he has received citizen complaints regarding Streets: Compression enforcement of compression brake violations in the City. Brake Usage ADMINISTRATIVE Referred 7/9/90 - Ralph Evans letter regarding Good Shepherd group home. REPORT Memorandum, dated July 11, 1990, to Mayor Clymer from Rezone: Good Shepherd Planning/Building/Public Works Administrator Lynn Guttmann, stated that Group Home (NE 19th Good Shepherd has met City standards for development based upon the fact Street);R=88-010/ that the applicant obtained a building permit prior to April 24, 1990, and received initial/conditional funding commitments. Ms. Guttmann also stated that the City has not traditionally defined "development" as requiring construction activities to be completed and/or a Certificate of Occupancy to be issued; the applicant was not mandated to meet such requirements prior to April 24, 1990. In response to Mr. Evans' question concerning the timing for the issuance of building permits, Ms. Guttmann reported that all application materials were fully reviewed by various departments and found to comply with requirements for the issuance of permits. Ms. Guttmann further stated that the time schedule for obtaining permits, funding, and construction bids is acceptable; and that there is no cause for City action to revoke building permits and/or cause reversion of the property from G-1 zoning to R-1 zoning at this time. In a memorandum from City Attorney Lawrence Warren to Mayor Clymer, Mr. Warren stated that if HUD agrees that the Good Shepherd group home project adequately achieves "separation of church and state," their determination would be acceptable to the City. Mayor Clymer announced that the Administration will meet with Mr. Evans to discuss these issues on July 24, 1990. Public Works: Metro Referred (6/11/90) - Council inquiry regarding utility tax on Metro. Sewage Disposal Memorandum from City Attorney Lawrence Warren to Mayor Clymer Agreement referring to RCW 35.58.560 which states in relevant part: "No county or city shall have the right to impose a tax upon the gross revenues derived by a metropolitan municipal corporation from the operation of a metropolitan sewage disposal, water supply, garbage disposal or public transportation system." Mr. Warren further stated that the City's utilities tax is a gross revenues tax and, therefore, is prohibited by statute. Executive Session MOVED BY MATHEWS, SECONDED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, COUNCIL CONVENE INTO EXECUTIVE SESSION TO DISCUSS LABOR NEGOTIATIONS. CARRIED. Time 10:10 p.m. ADJOURNMENT MOVED BY MATHEWS, SECONDED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, COUNCIL ADJOURN. CARRIED. Time 10:50 p.m. MARILYNd"-r)"2,71)-e -e-,4/ EN, CMC, City Clerk Recorder: Nancy Mills 07/23/90 r A( .01 4 f C:�'V UU1.fv .' a, U.S. Department of Housing and Urbah Development cji �/ Seattle Office, I xn X p/viO i 0 Arcade Plaza Building `,...,�,, 1321 Second Avenue �r i l ('. C Seattle, Washington 98101-2058 �i 0 CITY OF RENTON JUL 261990 July 25, 1990 +it;; :EIVED .,i I Y CLERK'S OFFICE Mr. Ralph M. Evans 3306 N.E. llth Place Renton, WA 98056 Dear Mr. Evans: SUBJECT: Good Shepherd of Washington I and II 127-EH124 and 127-EH125 Thank you for the information you provided our office on the subject projects. We are still reviewing the firm applications for these two projects and anticipate it will be another two to three weeks before that process is finished. If you have any questions, please contact me at the above address, Correspondence Code 10HDH, or telephone (206) 442-1177. Sincerely, Bob Arbios Chief Housing Programs Branch CITY OF RENTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM DATE: July 25, 1990 TO: Lynn Guttmann, Director FROM: Donald Erickson, Zoning Administrator STAFF CONTACT: Lenora Blauman, Senior Planner SUBJECT: Good Shepherd Group Home, N.E. 19th Street/Shelton Avenue, (R-010-88) Lenora Blauman and I met with Ralph Evans on July 24th in an effort to better understand his concerns about the above-referenced project, as well as to explain City standards and activities with respect to this development. To summarize, Mr. Evans correctly understands that the rezone of the project site was approved subject to development of that property within a one year period ending April 24, 1990 and that if development did not occur, zoning on the property would revert from G-1 to its original R-1 designation. Mr. Evans believes that as construction is not completed, development has not occurred, and that reversion is now required. Staff believe that the applicant continues to meet the conditions of the reclassification. Staff explained that development is traditionally interpreted to mean "reasonable progress" toward implementation of an approved plan. This definition is generally applied but is not codified. Staff and Mr. Evans agree that when the Zoning Ordinance is revised, definitions of "development" and related terms should be included to provide better general information. Staff explained that, given the complexity of this project, the fact that the applicant had obtained a building permit and a commitment from Seattle Mortgage for HUD funding was considered to be evidence of reasonable progress toward the implementation of the project. Mr. Evans does not agree that reasonable progress has been made and believes that City Council would support his point of view. He was encouraged to discuss this matter with City Council. Mr. Evans further contended that the building permit was not properly issued to Good Shepherd in that "Ken Nyberg and John Morris promised City Council" that the "issues of separation of church and state" would be resolved prior to building permit issuance. Staff research to this point has not indicated that City Council formally required such issue resolution (research continues); City regulation and precedent would customarily call for the Hearing Examiner to change any conditions of a project and this action has not been taken. Staff did explain to Mr. Evans, however, that the City Attorney has reported that the City is not required to ensure separation between church and state in order to permit a project. And, staff reiterated to Mr. Evans that Seattle Mortgage Company (HUD representative for this project) has indicated that the applicant has met the requirements for HUD funding, which would include a stipulation for separation of church and state. (Note: If the City agrees that the building permit needs to be withdrawn and reissued, staff would support a finite limit on that permit, and defined standards for suitable progress for construction of the development.) Mr. Evans also was concerned that Good Shepherd intended to violate the City's restriction for residents of the home, contending that he believed that it was likely that "mentally ill" people would be defined by Good Shepherd as suitable candidates for the residence. Staff explained that the City would be working with Good Shepherd representatives and DSHS to ensure that both the letter and spirit of the conditional use permit would be implemented. (Note: Following the meeting, Mr. Evans shared a copy of a communication from Ed Ball of Good Shepherd to John Morris, dated 6/18/90, which Mr. Evans believes confirms his concerns about the nature of the disability of home residents. Staff does not interpret the letter as indicating that "mentally ill" people would reside in the home, but rather notes that Mr. Ball is indicating that residents of the home may be mildly or moderately disabled, rather than severely disabled, and may, as well, have physical disabilities -- such as cerebral palsy or epilepsy -- which are secondary to their developmental disabilities.) Staff and Mr. Evans will continue to work together to ensure effective, timely communication concerning the above-referenced project. Staff will also be pleased to provide written information and/or presentations on this project to Council upon request. If you have any questions or would like additional information please contact me or Lenora Blauman. MAYOR'S ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT RESPONSE TO CITY COUNCIL INQUIRIES AND CITIZENS CONCERNS JULY 23, 1990 Council inquiry regarding utility tax on Metro June 11, 1990 Ralph Evans letter regarding Good Shepherd group home July 9, 1990 CITY ,F RENTON Office of the City Attorney Earl Clymer, Mayor July 23, 1990 TO: Mayor Earl Clymer/ Renton City Council FROM: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney RE: Good Shepherd and Separation of Church and State Dear Mr. Mayor and Council Members : I have had the opportunity to review the most current resolutions of the directors of Good Shepherd with reference to the practice of religion in their group home. Those resolutions revealed, amongst other things, the following: 1 . Individuals would be selected for the home without regard to their religious affiliation. 2 . There would be no compulsory church attendance by the residents, and the management of the home would make transportation available to those wishing to attend church irrespective of their religious affiliations . 3 . Religious symbols would be kept on a voluntary basis only in the living areas of the individual residents . The accompanying letter did cause me some concern . In that letter there was an expression of intent to teach Christian ideals to the members of the home. However, on closer reflection, those Christian ideals are rather social mores . For example, the letter cited teaching that one should not kill or steal . Those mores, to the extent they can be called religious, cut across all religions, and in fact would appear to be generally accepted as the difference between right and wrong, without regard to religion. Although the letter was awkwardly worded, I do not believe that teaching these ideals can be said to be a furtherance of Christianity, and therefore should not involve unnecessary church- state entanglement. I have not had an opportunity to contact HUD to ascertain what their ruling will be concerning, these new resolutions . However, I have advocated, throughout, that the city defer to HUD in making the initial decision on whether or not the operating characteristics of the home involved unnecessary church-state Post Office Box 626 - 100 S 2nd Street-Renton, Washington 98057 - (206) 255-8678 ' M&yor Earl Clymer & L.....ton City Council July 23, 1990 Page 2 entanglement. My independent analysis would show that they do not. If my contact with HUD reveals anything of importance I will again communicate with the council . If I can answer . any further questions you might have please feel free to contact me . • Lawrence J. Warren LJW: as . A8 . 58 : 65 . RENTON CITY COUNCIL Abbreviated Meeting July 9, 1990 Municipal Building Monday, 7:30 p.m. Council Chambers MINUTES CALL TO ORDER Mayor Earl Clymer led the Pledge of Allegiance to the flag and called the meeting of the Renton City Council to order. • ROLL CALL OF NANCY MATHEWS, President; TONI NELSON, THERESA ZIMMERMAN, COUNCIL MEMBERS JESSE TANNER, KATHY KEOLKER-WHEELER, RICHARD STREDICKE, ROBERT EDWARDS. CITY STAFF IN EARL CLYMER, Mayor; JOHN E. WEBLEY, Acting Executive Assistant; ATTENDANCE ZANETTA FONTES, Assistant City Attorney; MARILYN J. PETERSEN, City Clerk; DAN CLEMENTS, Finance Director; PRISCILLA PIERCE, Public Works/Community Development Administrative Analyst; LIEUTENANT DENNIS GERBER, Police Department. PRESS Tina Hilding, Valley Daily News; Anh Do, Seattle South Times. APPROVAL OF Correction to minutes of July 2, 1990: page 202, paragraph 7, margin title, to COUNCIL MINUTES read: "Library: Service to Non-City Residents." MOVED BY MATHEWS, SECONDED BY NELSON, COUNCIL APPROVE THE MINUTES OF JULY 2, 1990, AS CORRECTED. CARRIED. AUDIENCE COMMENT Ralph Evans, 3306 NE 11th Place, Renton, referred to an inquiry he made at Citizen Comment: Evans the June 11, 1990, Council meeting regarding reversion of zoning on the - Good Shepherd Group Good Shepherd group home property at 19th and Shelton. He stated that by Home Rezone, NE 19th issuing building permits for this project, the City is violating terms of Street, R-88-010 restrictive covenants in Ordinance No. 4212 which required development of the property within one year, and that the City has not resolved the issue of separation of church and state by HUD. He asked for the official date of approval of the rezone, and requested the City revoke the building permits for this property until this issue is resolved. Citizen Comment: Vaupel Versie Vaupel, P. O. Box 755, Renton, questioned the issuance of building - Good Shepherd Group permits or use of City money on the Good Shepherd project prior to Home Rezone, NE 19th determination on the issue of church and state separation. Council requested Street a full report from the Administration on this issue. CONSENT AGENDA Items on the consent agenda are adopted by one motion which follows the listing. Budget: 1990 Finance Department submitted 1990 housekeeping budget adjustments in the Housekeeping Ordinance total amount of $12,906,515.00 for Budget Amendment Ordinance. Refer to Ways and Means Committee. Budget: 1990 Reduction Finance Department submitted 1990 budget reduction in amount of Ordinance $736,579.00 to modify 1990 budget. Broad adjustment categories include: 1. $150,000.00 in unanticipated revenues; 2. A net cost of$14,932.00 for the Administrative reorganization and compensation survey; and 3. $601,511.00 reduction in expenditures for various departments. Refer to Ways and Means Committee. Public Works: West Finance/City Clerk reported 7/5/90 bid opening for West Kennydale sewer Kennydale Sewer extension; 4 bids; engineer's estimate: $402,446.57. Refer to Utilities Extension Committee. • Claim: Aames Floral, Claim for damages in the amount of $251.87 filed by Florence Carlo of CL-39-90 Aames Floral, 17650 140th Avenue SE, Renton, for replacement of windshield alleged broken by golf ball from Maplewood Golf Course due to downed protective netting (5/11/90). Refer to City Attorney and insurance service. RECEIVED CITY OF RENTON JUL I 3 1990 PUBLIC WORKS/COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM DATE: July 11, 1990 TO: Fail Clymer, Mayor FROM: Lym39,Gen, Director STAFF CONTACT: Donald K. Erickson, Principal Planner Extension 2550 Lenora Blauman, Project Manager Extension 2550 SUBJECT: Good Shepherd of Washington Group Home, N.E. 19th Street at Shelton Avenue, (Ref# 90-087) This memorandum is written for the purpose of responding to a letter from Ralph Evans (dated July 3,1990), expressing concerns about the above-referenced project. Mr. Evans has asked "why the City wasn't taking the action the ordinance required" for returning this property to R-1 zoning classification. Staff report that Good Shepherd has met City standards for development based upon the fact that the applicant obtained a building permit prior to April 24, 1990 and received initial/conditional funding commitments as well. No extension of time was necessary to achieve these goals. The City has not traditionally defined "development" as requiring construction activities to be completed and/or a Certificate of Occupancy to be issued; the applicant was not mandated to meet such requirements to prior to April 24, 1990. Thus, staff believe that there is no cause for the City to move toward rezoning of the site at this time. In response to Mr. Evans' question concerning the timing for the issuance of building permits, staff report that all application materials were fully reviewed by various departments and found to comply with requirements for the issuance of such permits on April 20, 1990. Staff note that a funding commitment is not a prerequisite for the issuance of building permits for any project. Mr. Evans' questions concerning issues related to separation of church and state have been referred to City Attorney, Lawrence Warren. He has reported in an attached memorandum that if HUD agrees that the project adequately achieves "separation of church and state", that determination would be acceptable to the City. Seattle Mortgage Company has reported a firm commitment to HUD funding, which should also serve to support the opinion that these issues have been resolved. In sum, staff report that the Good Shepherd is moving toward completion of the group home project in a manner which meets the objectives of the City for ensuring the timely development of a residence for six developmentally disabled adults. The time schedule for obtaining permits, funding, and construction bids is acceptable, appropriately reflecting the complexity of the project. The applicant will be expected to meet all conditions established in the.building permit. As such, staff suggest that there is no cause for City action to revoke building permits and/or cause reversion of the property from G-1 zoning to R-1 zoning at this time. If you have further questions, please contact Donald Erickson or Lenora Blauman at 235-2550. responl5/mr /d, CJJ " M e► c CIT`. ' OF RE TON ' Office of the City Attorney Earl Clymer, Mayor RECEFVED JUL ? 2. 1999 July 10 , 1990 TO: Ron Shelley, Acting Coordinator Housing and Human Services FROM: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney RE : Good Shepherd Projects Dear Ron: I have reviewed the city' s correspondence to Good Shepherd and Mr. ' Edward Ball ' s response . I presume your department has reviewed the letter for compliance with city requirements . I would like to have HUD determine whether or not the attached policies adequately address the church-state issue. That is their area of expertise and not the City of Renton' s . Of course, if HUD refuses to make that determination the city still must ensure that the residence meets constitutional standards for separation of church and state . The policy certainly seemed to be getting closer to being acceptable although I still feel a little uneasy about the use of state funds for such an overtly religious organization. If we leave the question of church-state separation to HUD, then I saw nothing else in Mr. Ball ' s letter that was of great concern to me . If I can provide you with any further information please let me know. i CX---1-14-7 Lawrence J. Warren LJW:as . cc : Mayor Clymer / A8 . 58 : 01 . F,STAT4. CHUCK CLARKE Director 1889 STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Ninth & Columbia Building, MS/GH-51 • Olympia, Washington 98504-4151 • (206) 753-2200 July 20, 1990 PLANNING DIVISION Lenora Blauman CITY OF RENTON City of Renton Department of Community Development JUL 2 3 1990 200 Renton, 1 Ave. South WA98055 DECEIVED Ms. Blauman: When we spoke on the phone today you related to me that there had recently been some public opposition to siting a group home for developmentally disabled individuals in Renton. The Federal Fair Housing Amendments Act of 1988 protects the rights of handicapped individuals to live where they choose. Legislation passed during the 1989 session of the Washington State Legislature directed the Department of Community Development to develop a model ordinance for siting of Residential Care Facilities, and required local governments to complete need and demand studies regarding Residential Care Facilities. We currently are working to meet the deadline of December 31, 1990 and will submit the ordinance to local governments sometime after the first of the year. If there is general acceptance of the concept of the ordinance and local jurisdictions move to adopt it, there is a good chance that pre- emptive legislation could be avoided. In addition to developing the model ordinance, we are working with local governments to complete the required need and demand study. In June, we sent out a survey tool to all mayors and county executives to complete. As of this writing, there has been no response from Renton. Perhaps you would like to check and see if this is being completed by other staff, or if you need we can send another copy out to you. The deadline for completion of the need and demand study is August 31, 1990 and the results must be sent to DCD by September 30, 1990. Enclosed please find various materials regarding zoning under the Federal Fair Housing Amendments Act of 1988 . Please do not. hesitate to call if you have any further questions, or need more information. I can be reached at (206) 586-0666. Sincerely, Joanne T. McCaughan, Sta f Coordinator enclosure 3 CITY OF RENTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM • DATE: July 19, 1990 TO: Mayor Earl Clymer FROM: Lynn Guttmann, Director STAFF CONTACT: Donald Erickson, Principal Planner Lenora Blauman, Senior Planner SUBJECT: Good Shepherd Group Homes This memorandum is written in response to your referral of July 17th regarding a letter from Ralph Evans (dated July 9, 1990) concerning the Good Shepherd Group Homes. A meeting with Mr. Evans is being scheduled to discuss his questions and concerns directly for the purpose of assisting Mr. Evans in understanding development standards and regulations affecting these projects. Following that meeting, a memorandum will be prepared for the purpose of reporting the discussion. This memorandum will be transmitted to your office to be shared with the City Council as appropriate. If you have questions or would like additional information, please contact Mr. Erickson or Ms. Blauman at 235-2550. evans719/mr City of Renton Planning Division Community Development Department Memorandum Date: July 16, 1990 To: Larry S. From: Lenora B. Subject: Good Shepherd The state has passed Bill #1968 concerning long term care services. It will change some parameters for siting group homes and may change some standards for those homes as well. It is not yet clear how or if Renton will be impacted. It is likely that we may be required to allow group homes in all residential zones -- now they are only allowed in one single- family type zone, which is G-1, but it is certainly possible that the new law could call for them to be placed in the R-1 zone. Restoring the group home properties to their original zoning, under those circumstances, would not serve to prevent the group home about which Mr. Evans is concerned. There is also some distinct possibility that this law, and/or others under consideration would remdve group homes from their designation as a conditional use -- resulting in our having less control over how these homes appear and function. I have asked for the state to clarify the likelihood of this change -- no definitive information is available yet, however, the trend appears to be directed toward fewer controls on these residential facilities. The law is attached. Please see me for further information. • IrIM L BROWN ROOF TAN SIDING/ - a p ---ql no g 8 ����El 0 2 ;z NORTH ELEVATION SCALE:V4°.1'-0° v" g ' LOUVER CLASS A COMPOSITION - I ` _ e SHINGLE ROOF /, // / `��\ , ANODIZED ALUMIMA1 GUTTERS RAM LEADERS / / — TIGHT KNOT CEDAR SIDING ` FIN.FLOOR ELEV. / - _ -- r '1r ANODIZED ALUM.WMDO1JJ A r,-i EAST ELEVATION SCALE:I/4°°I.-0° INSULATING GLAZINGZ �y P.Z.--I B . OO s A ti Of f2<. 0 O C4' • 00 El=I❑ _ - d SOUTH ELEVATION SCALE:I/4°.1'-0° N Z D VO — -—c LL� .. ii W w X1 w w — r�� — - — WEST ELEVATION SCALE:V4°=I.-0° • ,,,,, Date ,, A2 • /-NEW FIRE HYDRANT EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT - , J. EXISTIG]•WATER• NE.19th STREET GB ,°9 NEW B•WATER �• I '■/',•` - _._._._ ._._.. ._._._._._._._._._._._. _._._._._._._.'._._.1._._.-._._. _. ..-.-.-._._.-q.J/-EXIST.B•WATER EXISTIG EDGE LE PAVWG � I�' T -1 I -- -- NEW B_SANL SEUER - -�' -- -- _ -------- II y 41. GY9 r EXIST.P.P. -l- y _JY -�EXISTIG POWER POLE __ - -_._- -`"". P ,-NEW PAVING EXIST.Pm1ER / T nWi - --_ NEW SIDEWALK-� \ \ ' I / 1]B _=rc___�•.7 A _ _ X. b RELOCATED POSER POLE \\ I _ I / r• es¢m• -�T m'UTILITY EASEMENT \`_- _ ]ismm' \-._._4Bm WOO 1` - dS2 to ..�I \ \ \R FH \ 1 I IK--6'HGH CEDAR FETNr2 \\ \ \ II I -1 \ -42S I ' ,\. iv�j� I I TYPICAL FEnANDER DE snE \ \\ I I I \ 4]B \ I I I ' N G1G11 y I. W I \2 I I \\ \ \ I ,` I III III QS \ 4Il I 4l0\ I-4]9 1 I 1 Ili '�. z I 4]B I �" � I a I I __' _IL_4]B Z I II uB- t GROUP HOME I 11 V I O 1 I / I \ FN.FL ELEV.AWN -- Y•-6• I Q I ` 4]l/4•-m•j k ]mb• - ]4'-bl\ NII_ I Z In // N I I. 1 a) / \ -LIr \ .I Ali EX AND LE i.11 TO BE I Vk p I �� \ / \1 .. I I Fi �� a �,;t, I I \\ BTOIABNTERDRAIFIELD / • $ I 0 I a '; I I i �\ .6 11 I 1 i ::p I / / 1 I I gi Ix°x I E-N(/) b'HIGH CFD CE I ,m A. =4. • • • • • • • Warl HHC + T �'°"m'J Q .6 1 I I q o 4Il 4T I ' • SITE PLAN 4}6 I O Z L.`•.i • m5 • 1 ll PLANTING SCHEDULE - •-1 -•--•be m B ° - _ o oca T o o1g 1'111I111,I KEY LATIN NAME COSSON NAME CONDITION l SIZE REMARKS.SPACING a�Q °� LGI.N S�Q °" .. IAIeN O [A 1' I,� I WO.6ml HEDERA HELM ENGLISH IVY FLAT n•o/c O N. o 1I n 206 TOP RAIL ON HANGER H�j.J aj TRIANGULAR PATTER: / .��N- dB CEDAR BOARDS•oro/c W 9STAGGERED BOTH BIDES j IY. Idy u y HTPEWGIT LALYLIOIi 8T.JOHJS1bRf TfT iR1ANCALLAR PATTERN V y I ure.:1:11,1111... W �I bxb ifEATED POET l7 V IHHHNHu ERICA rnGuvA 'SPRIYAIWDLLNIIE' EW;JPge�,_ I,,(� (e(�� 6HEATHERn �`.ql Y"WINTER BARBERRY L Sm•o/c 0 T ]P osurE L N• O RNODwESros 1 •cHISTMIA9 c1EER' I GaL X+•do J I °u 'WW2'COND.POST FTA W W 0 RNODODQIDRTN 'JEAV 0ARIE' I GAL 36•etc I p eO j e V a B•REBAR THRI POST Z Q Q N0 I OITRIA JAPONICA JAPANESE BKI41W I GAL %•o/c I Ei W II l •• 1 V U nTRLA CAL60RECA PALFIC WAX MYRTLE ]GAL B'-m•e/c ve SO L N Tn e I O FENCE DETAIL i Q it T.oCCIDENTALIe CEDAR BNB B MN B'-0'o/c I I OE'n et�dl BCALe,b•.I•-m• N T�OIYd.AB PYRAMIDAL' 'E 0 OERQI0 PALUSTRIS PIN OAK BM,Iy CAL ( LAM - 3 , W � I Ilii I� PRIM BE331IA IOYAN ZAN DERxY BNB,I.Ca. O LANDSCAPE PLAN a v tje. ACER R10R11 RED MAPLE 510,I.•CAL SCALE.I•.]m'-m• A 1 °Apra AL.,O•HIGH...JARRUBBER G I�/CA AS INDICATED 10'EASEMENT I 0 O TWIST WFg BIDS 'CD gi T^— — — — fr IS z N4 NAILED TO STAKES li HEI']STAGES • / �/� • rBaa o CH I!I I / \ //\ O HIND" �IL&1R_AP*II / � . ILWEIS ry / ►.1 ••O `\` J O'GREATER THAN ROOT BALL ►:� ��uuu u (�••�(O Sul__ •71 DECIDUOUS TREE PLANTING DETAIL L` -� �..H H O O O O-^'� /I� I NO SCALE 0 0 �•H J SJ SL 06 p o A N 6.6.1, CHEW). J I ::i IEGA GUT W RES 2.BAWL MULCH 'U. \11//p L i — % ROLL BURLAP 116 ING SOIL w APPLE Iq►�i /l\\\ `6 MOUND SOIL 6•TO FOFTI O I j 1-aLS• �. I BASIN ABOVE GRADE ® o Hq►� �\IU_ 1 0 (-2,O,O,CEDAR STAKES WI 0 Q _O O g+ q-� U N391S NO SLICK SURFACES I-g o,40 0o O000 n N 5 a O;OOIJ, s 1 Ot O /l\\� Ek �m W i j o O y T I,O•GREATER THAN ROOT BALL g g 14 F FEAR vo �1I/% EVERGREEN TREE PLANTING DETAIL CO I' 'CHOJUF'KJ' 4 O� /I\� NO SCALE ®�a LLi ER oo Doo QO 0000 i 00 W� BROOKS• o o O 0 t I. �� �o `Q� G9 C�z m o Do •A p0 O V ,�K" I O Op LAUM VV 9 Tg u lac I� 0DOO °a000� & � �Q0a '' E INs<"EDAS 6. tia d 0o �O Do 0o - Oo tc7=> O pV// t// pV �\1, \\Il/ \\I/O O11// �V// \1I/ \U// W/ \I// O I IV-IFA G •G J•G G • �, • •G •G • •- p 00 e• .00 71\\ %411\� �qll\` %/IPA /l\\� /l\\� /I\\` %/IPA ��/ll\\` ��//ll' ��/ll1\� %ll1\` • O O 09 0 ��� - 00 O I\ II GROUND COVER PLANTING PATTERN -I l 4 00 � —�— D HGH��ARPalE• HDSCALE o y J j O N.E.19th ST LANDSCAPE PLAN n w-, Lu — _.I — —.t_. J 0 ]w TOP RAIL off HANGER •v&1 F,I°.p•.o• Q.A 0 I.CEDAR BOA G.B'c/c KEY LAIN NAME COFPICN NAME CONDITION I SIZE REMARKS,SPACING KEY LATM NAME COMMON NAME 0001TICN.51ZE REMARKS,SPACING U V 0.O STAGGERED BOTH SIDES• ill]BARK MJLCH •6 TREATED POST ]•BARK MULCH J ERICA c-AR.1FA 'SPRING OOOD WIITE' �.`' u O e/c CD y P. 2 LA. • rb BOTTOM RAIL u H Ti PARE BIB,Iy• • fk HYPERIDIM CALTCIMM 9T.JOMJSJORT FLAT ( C.DEODARA B.B,}MEM.,BARK MULCH KNOWN 3•DEEP OVER N / J J A i I CEDAR STAKES •'. REMOVE CONTAINER 0 - SMOOTH SUB-GRADE III B •36•Ws 1]SR•CONK.POST FT. I-- NO SLICK SURFACES T 0 �f R PALUSTRIS .B,14:CAL Ian •B }' Ft ANIS.90R Z ® B CRASSFOLLIA ENTER BARBERRY 2 GAL,}4•TALL 30'c/cI- I=MIIIRM + U -.i_4.�AT,Fy a LARGER FZ-- R]OOODEtIDRON 'CHISTMd.CHEER }GAL.].•TALL 36•c c . MINIS SEFTEAIA MANDAN CERRY B.B.IA CAL .' '11 Q l- o RNODODBORON JFA4 MdWE• }GAL,2,TALL 36•5, '� III ,/1I ill EDGING DETAIL FENCE DETAIL SHRUB PLANTING DETAIL J = -o SKTTIIA JAPGNICA JAPANERE SKRVIIA 2 GAL,24•TALL 36•e/6 eV,.4 4 ACER RIDRUM RED MAPLE B.B.IV:CAL II N NaP Be),I CAL LS II NO v>I F NO SCALE NO SCALE MYRCd CALPOfuVICd PACIFIC WAx MTRRE 2 GAL}a•TALL 5-O•e/c FRET TREES SEE PLAN ya;-r,;,\r -a: x : , • vr,4"'r ,:'F f _ • mot-- • ;r� =F:�[�;-�' _7.1g.. a.} 'ki.A's'paC:ait4!?':4s+r•�}Sai^itc; '.: —,. -. .-sg:.. ram` _ CHAPTER 427 ! • `• :i [Substitute House Si11 No. 1968] • LONG TERM CARE SERVICES i ;;: AN.ACT Relating to bong—term care; amending RCW 74.08 54]. 74.0&345. 74.08.550, :�:" 1 74.08.570, 74.41.050, and 74.09.520: adding a new chapter to Title 74 RCW, adding a new. ] chap4cr to Title 70 RCW;adding a new section to chapter 74.09 RCW:adding a new section _ • ": 1 to chapter 35.63 RCW;adding a new section to chapter 35A.63 RCW;adding anew section to • chapter 36.70 RCW:adding a new section to chapter 35.22 RCW;adding.a new suction to '.- - - - 1 chapter 3632 RCW: creating new sections: repealing RCW 74.08.844: making an appropris- ..• }' Lion;and declaring an emergency. L, • v; j - 1 ] 1 • • �y • :• WASHINGTON LAWS, 1989 r WASHINGTON LAWS, 1989 Ch. 427 tlx: Y �'_•'.t }•' F x, ,,t. aj. � ��_enacted by the Legislature of the State of Washington: i (9) Support educational institutions in Washington state to assist in the 6`'- .1.%.f%R ;,, : procurement of federal support for expanded research and training in long- '' ;'y =i:; .• 1*IEW SECTION. Sec. 1_The legislature finds that: ; '47 :-.: t term care;and Wit... :.3.. ; �. ,,,,...:,�.,, .'!'Washington's chronically functionally disabled population is growing at , =- „,.-e . i (10) Facilitate the development of a coordinated system of long-term i.•s,4.,;.a:.rapid pace. This growth, along with economic and social changes and the • Y g- {,, +. luting age wave, presents opportunities for the development of long-term . care education that is clearly articulated between all levels of higher educa- r'a: ire community services networks and enhanced volunteer participation in tion and reflective of both in-home care needs and institutional care needs :those networks, and creates a need.for different approaches to currently t of functionally disabled persons. •" fragmented long-term care programs. The legislature further recognizes ' NEW SECTION. Sec. 3. A valuable option available to Washington that persons with functional disabilities should receive long-term care ser- state to achieve the goals of sections 1 and 2 of this act is the flexibility in • vices that encourage individual dignity, autonomy,and development of their personal care and other long-term care services encouraged by the federal • fullest human potential. government under Title XIX of the federal social security act. These ser- NEW SECTION. Sec. 2;The purpose of this chapter is to: vices include options to expand community-based long-term care services, '' (1) Establish a balanced range of community-based health, social, and such as adult family homes, congregate care facilities, respite, chore ser- supportive services that deliver long-term care services to chronically, func- j vices, hospice, and case management. tionally disabled persons of all ages; i I:CHOR E SERVICES (2) Ensure that functional disability shall be the determining factor in Sec_ 4. Section i 7, chapter 6, Laws of 1981 l st ex_ sess. as last defining long-term care service needs and that these needs will be deter- r amended, by section 1, chapter 222, Laws of 1986 and RCW 74.08.541 are mined by a uniform system for comprehensively assessing functional 1 i each amended to read as follows: • disability; l (3) Ensure that services are provided in the most independent living l (1) 'Department' as used in this chapter, means the department of social and health services. • situation consistent with individual needs; (2) `Long-term care facility' as used in this chapter, means a nursing (4) Ensure that long-term care service options shall be developed and i home licensed under chapter 18.51 RCW or a residential habilitation center made available that enable functionally disabled persons to continue to live licensed under chapter 71 A.20 RCW. in their homes or other community residential facilities while in the care of "Chore services,' as used in this chapter, means services in per- their families or other volunteer support persons; forming ((light~roik and het sL..hold and otlhc,)) personal care and related (5) Ensure that long-term care services are coordinated in a way that tasks (( minimizes administrative cost, eliminates unnecessarily complex organza- frailtror ))as provided in the department's medical tine, minimizes program and service duplication, and maximizes the use of assistance state plan provision addressing personal care. financial resources in directly meeting the needs of persons with functional (( )) Persons eligible for chore services are adult ((individuals)) limitations; • persons having resources less than a level determined by the department, (6) Develop a systematic plan for the coordination, planning, budget- 0 ((and)) whose need for chore services and risk of being placed in a ((riesl- ing,and administration of long-term care services now fragmented between - dential)) long-term care facility have been determined by the department, the division of developmental disabilities, division of mental health, aging and who are not eligible to receive medical assistance personal care benefits and adult services administration, division of children and family services, under RCW 74.09.520: division of vocational rehabilitation, office on AIDS, division of health, and (a) Persons are eligible for the level ((or &eneuut)) of services deter- bureau of alcohol and substance abuse; mined by the department under RCW 74.08..545 if the persons ((arc: (i) (7) Encourage the development of a state-wide long-term care case management system that effectively coordinates the plan of care and ser- (ii) eliaible at the time their s11gibility for chore-set-vie. ;s det r need ke vices provided to eligible clients; eeclOteemined, for limited caaealty prof am mealya.a} tiarU as tkij SICti by r (8) Ensure that individuals and organizations affected by or interested RCW7.4.09.0-10, orir(• ))) have an income at or below thirty percent of the ' in long-term care programs have an opportunity to participate in identifi- state median income. cation of needs and priorities, policy development, planning, and develop- (b) For other persons, the department shall develop a scale which pro- meet, implementation, and monitoring of state supported long-term care • _ gressively reduces the level ((an amount)) of chore services provided by the programs; - z r, „y, - i lit ) ,,,:m'•427 WASHINGTON LAWS, 1989 411r WASHINGTON LAWS, 1989 Ch. 427 department based on the ability of applicants and ((teeipieats)) clients to I Therefore, the department shall'provide services only p to those persons rden- :purchase the chore services_ ((To deti,mine the ability* of applicants aad tifxed as at risk of being placed in a ((tzsikkatia})) long—term care facility in retipients to purchase chute aka vii..es7,)) The department shall not consider the absence of such services. Chore services shall be provided ((osriy)) to the income below thirty percent of the state median income_ extent necessary to maintain a safe and healthful living environment. It is (c) Effort shall be made to obtain chore services from volunteer chore the policy of the state to encourage the development of volunteer chore ser- service providers under the senior citizens services act, chapter 74.38 RCW; vices in local communities as a means of meeting chore care service needs for those individuals at risk of being placed in a residential care facility and and directing financial resources. In determining ((au iinlirnluals)) eligibil- who are age sixty or over but eligible for five hours of chore services per ity for chore services, the :department shall consider the following: g month or less, rather than have those services provided by paid providers. ( (I) The kind of services needed; Any individual at risk of being.placed in a residential care facility and who (2) The degree of service need, and the extent to which an individual is • is age sixty or over but not eligible for chore services or eligible for a re- dependent upon such services to remain in his or her home or return to his 'duced amount of service shall be referred to a volunteer chore service pro- t or her home; %``•am under the senior citizens services act, chapter 74.38 RCW, where (3) The availability of personal or community resources which may be - /ailable for needed services not authorized by the department_ utilized to meet the individual's need;and (d) ((fadividuala)) Persons determined by the department to be eligible (4) Such other factors as the department considers necessary to insure for adult protective services are eligible to receive emergency chore services service is provided only to those persons whose chore service needs cannot without regard to income if the services are essential to, and a subordinate be met by relatives, friends, nonprofit organizations, or other persons. •part of, the adult protective services plan. Emergency chore services under In determining the level of services to be provided under this chapter, adult protective services shall be provided only until the situation nt1vc i- ((the depart.«cnt shall-utilize a dicnt review gncationnairc el,signed)) client tating the services has stabilized, not to exceed ninety days. ' shall be assessed using an instrument designed by the department to deter- ((3})) (5) The department shall establish a monthly dollar lid on mine ((both)) the(( )) level of functional disabili- chore services expenditures as necessary to maintain such expenditures t , the need for service and the y ((individual s)) persons risk of within the legislative appropriation. To maintain expenditures for chore ((inst;tutickaalirartio )) long—term services within the limits of funds appropriated for this purpose,the depart- care facility placement. meet may reduce the level ((ot areount)) of services authorized below the See. 6. Section 3, chapter Si, Laws of 1973 1st ex. sess. as last level of need assessed pursuant to RCW 74.08.545 for some or all ((tacipi- amended by section 189, chapter 3, Laws of 1983 and RCW 74.08.550 are Lida, but)) clients. The reductions shall be done in a manner which main- .3 each amended to read as follows- tains state-wide uniformity of eligibility and service authorization standards (1) The de • td which considers the level of need for services and the degree of risk of partment ((of s�.ial a.rd 1p alth S�l1;0 S)), is authorized to • develop a program to provide for those services enumerated in RCW .;sing placed in a((residential)) long—term care facility of all applicants for, i 74.08.54I. and recipients of, chore services: PROVIDED, That the department may F (2) ((The-department shall cndeavoi to abz-dfc that, for caLh icad;siJaal implement a ratable reduction of hours or payment for some or all clients receiving chore services. ' (6) The department may continue providing chore services for those g } Lh Ibl,. clients who were receiving assistance only with household.tasks prior to { December 14, 1987,provided that those clients are receiving this same sec- 3 {3 )) The department may provide assistance in the recruiting of pro- vide as of June 1989. viders of the services enumerated in RCW 74.08.541 and seek to assure the i timely provision of services in emergency situations. (7) The department may continue providing chore services to clients f (( )) The department shall assure that all providers of the ser- who were receiving attendant care services prior to April I, 1988, provided vices enumerated in RCW 74.08.541 are compensated for the delivery of that those clients are receiving the same services as of June 1989. the services on a prompt and regular basis. Sec. 5. Section 16,chapter 6,Laws of 1981 1st ex_ sess.and RCW 74- + Sec, 7.Section 3, chapter 137, Laws of 1980 and RCW 74.08.570 are .48.545 are each amended to read as follows: 1 each amended to read as follows: It is the intent of the legislature that chore services be provided to cli- , gible persons within the limits of funds appropriated for that purpose. .i "'Ch. 427 WASH1NGTON LAWS} 1989 1 WASHi(NGTON LAWS, 1989 Ch. 427 (1 An otherwise eligible disabled person shall not be deemed ineligible i in paying for respite care,and arranging for respite care services. Rates of for chore services under this chapter if the person's gross income from cm- payment to respite care service providers shall not exceed,and may be less ployment, adjusted downward by the cost of the chore services to be pro- than, rates paid by the department to providers for the same level of service. vided and the disabled person's work expenses, does not exceed the In evaluating the need for respite services, consideration shall be given to maximum eligibility standard established by the department for such chore 1 the mental and physical ability of the caregiver to perform nrei-scary services.The department shall establish a sliding scale fee schedule for such 7caregiver functions. disabled persons, taking into consideration the person's ability to pay and i work expenses- i ilI.TITLE XIX COMMUNITY—BASED LONG—TE4� CARE SERVICES (2) If a disabled person arranges for chore services through an individ- i NEW SECTION. Sec. 4. Title XIX of the federal social security act ual provider arrangement, the ((iccipicut's)) client's contribution shall be counted as first dollar toward the total amount owed to the provider for I offers valuable opportunities to increase federal funds available:to provide e----\ chore services rendered. i community—based long—terra care services to functionally disabled persons (3) As used in this section: in their homes, and in noninstitutional residential facilities, such as adult 'Gross (a) income" means total earned wages, commissions, salary,' family homes and congregate care facilities. and any bonus; A. PERSONAL CARE, HOSPICE (b) "Work expenses" includes: Sec. 10. Section 5, chapter 30, Laws of 1967 ex. sess. as last amended (i) Payroll deductions required by lava or as a condition of employment, by.section 3, chapter 5, Laws of 1985 and RCW 74.09.520 are each in amounts actually withheld; amended to read as follows: (ii) The necessary cost of transportation to and from the place of em- The term 'medical assistance" may include the following care and ployment by the most economical means, except rental cars; and services: ({ )) ,a Inpatient hospital services;(({-2})) ibl outpatient hospi- (iii) Expenses of employment necessary for continued employment, tal services; (tom)) (c) other laboratory and x—ray services; (((4))) (d) such as tools, materials, union dues, transportation to service customers if skilled nursing home services; (((-5))) (e) physicians' services, which shall not furnished by the employer, and uniforms and clothing needed on the job include prescribed medication and instruction on birth control devices; and not suitable for wear away from the job; (((-6--))) fa medical care, or any other type of remedial care as may be es- (c) "Employment" means any work activity for which a recipient re- tablished by the secretary; (( 7))) home health care services;(((B})) (h) ceives monetary compensation; private duty nursing services; (((9))) fil dental services; ((Oft))) (i) physi- (d) "Disabled" means: cal therapy and related services; (( )) Do. prescribed drugs, dentures, { (i) Permanently and totally disabled as defined by the department and and prosthetic devices; and eyeglasses prescribed by a physician skilled in as such definition is approved by the federal social security ((aELacy)) ad- diseases of the eye or by an optometrist, whichever the individual may se- ministration for federal matching funds; lect; (((I2))) (I) personal care services, as provided in this section; (m) hos- (ii) Eighteen years of age or older;• pice services; (n) other diagnostic, screening, preventive, and rehabilitative - (iii) A resident of the state of Washington; and services: PROVIDED, That the department may not cut off any prescrip- (iv) Willing to submit to such examinations as are deemed necessary tiara medications, oxygen supplies, respiratory services, or other life—sus- by the department to establish the extent and nature of the disability. raining medical services or supplies. 1 II. RESPITE SERVICES See. 8. Section 5, chapter 158, Laws of 1984 as amended by section 4, 'Medical assistance,' notwithstanding any other provision of law, shall not include routine foot care,or dental services delivered by any health care P. chapter 409, Laws of 1987 and RCW 74.41.050 are each amended,to read provider, that are not mandated by Title XIX of the social security act un- as follows: less there is a specific appropriation for these services. The department shall ((select)) contract with area agencies on aging or (2) The department shall amend the state plan for medical assistance under Title XIX of the federal social security act to include personal care other appropriate agencies to conduct respite care projects to the extent of services, as defined in 42 C.F.R. 444.17Q{f), in the categorically nrrriy r available funding.The responsibilities of the ((salu.t�,d ac..a)) agencies ((on aging)) shall include but not be limited to: Negotiating rates of payment, program. administering sliding—fee scales to enable eligible participants to participate • Ch. 427 WASHINGTON LAWS, 1989 it WASHINGTON LAWS, 1989 Ch.427 l (3) The department shall adopt,amend, or rescind such administrative F limited casualty program for the medically needy under RCW 74.09,700_ rules as are nri s ary to ensure that Title XIX personal care services are f Respite services shall be included as a service available under the waiver. provided to eligible persons in conformance with federal regulations. IV. LONG—TERM CARE REFORM IMPLEMENTATION TEAM (a) These administrative rules shall include financial eligibility.indexed ;, according to the requirements of the social security act providing for med- INEW SECTION. Sec. 13. (1) A long—term care commission is ere- a atcd. It shall consist of: icaid eligibility. i (a) Four legislators who shall serve on the executive committee, one (b) The rules shall_require clients be assessed as having a medical con- dition requiring assistance with personal care tasks.. Plans of care must be fr°m each of the two largest caucuses in the house of representatives and approved by a physician and reviewed by a nurse every ninety days. # the senate-who shall be selected by the president of the senate and the (4) The department shall design and implement a means to assess the speaker of the house of representatives; level of functional disability of persons. eligible for personal care services (b) Six members, to be selected by the executive committee, who shall under this section. The personal care services benefit shall be provided to be authorities in gerontology, developmental disabilities, neurological im- the extent funding is available according to the assessed level of functional pairttterlts, physical disabilities, mental illness, nursing, long—term care ser disability_ Any reductions in services made necessary for funding reasons "i delivery, long—term care service financing, systems development, or should be accomplished in a manner that assures that priority for maintain- systems analysis; ing services is given to persons with the greatest need as determined by the (c) Three members, to be selected by the executive committee, who assessment of functional disability. represent long—term care consumers,services providers, or advocates; • (.5)The department shall report to the appropriate fiscal committees of (d) Two members, to be selected by the executive committee, who rep the legislature on the utilization and associated costs of the personal care resent county government; option under Title XIX of the federal social security act, as defined in 42 (e) One member, to be selected by the secretary of social and health C.F.R. 440.170(f), in the categorically needy program. This report shall be services,to represent the department of social and health services long—term submitted by January 1, 1990, and submitted on a yearly basis thereafter. . . care programs, including at least developmental disabilities, mental health, (6) Effective July 1, 1989, the department shall offer hospice services aging and adult services, AIDS, children's services, alcohol and. substance in accordance with available funds. The department shall provide a corn- abuse, and vocational rehabilitation;and plete accounting of the costs of providing hospice services under this section (f) Two members, to represent the governor, who shall serve on the executive committee. by December 20, 1489_ The report shall include an assessment of cost say- The legislative members shall select a chair from the membershipof ings which may result by providing hospice to persons who otherwise would use hospitals,nursing homes, or more expensive care. The hospice benefit the commission. r under this section shall terminate on April 1, 1990, unless extended by the The commission shall be staffed, to the extent possible, by staff from • the appropriate senate and house of representatives committees. ]egislature. The commission may form technical advisory committees to assist it B. COPES RESPITE SERVICES with any particular matters deemed necessary by the commission. NEW SECTION. Sec. II. The department shall request an amend- The commission and technical advisory committee members shall re- merit to its community options program entry system waiver under section ceive no compensation, but except for publicly funded agency staff,shall, to 1905(c) of the federal social security act to inc]ude respite services as a the extent funds are available, be reimbursed for their expenses while at- service available under the waiver. .' tending any meetings in the same manner as legislators engaged in interim C. COMMUNITY—BASED SERVICES FOR PERSONS WITH AIDS committee business as specified in RCW 44.04.120. The commission may receive appropriations, grants, gifts, and other NEW SECTION. Sec. 12. A new section is added to chapter 74.09 payments from any y governmental or other public or private entity or person RCW to read as follows: = which it mayuse to defraythe cost of its operations or to contract for tech- The department shall prepare and request a waiver under section nical assistance, with the approval of the senate committee on facilities and !915(c)of the federal social security act to provide community based long— term care services to persons with AIDS or AIDS—related conditions who operations and the house of representatives executive rules committee. qualify for the medical assistance program under RCW 74.09.510 or the ' 'l S .li.. ; Ch. 427 WASHINGTON LAWS, 1989 WASHINGTON LAWS, 1989 Ch. 427 • (2) The long—term care commission shall develop legislation and rec- V. ADULT FAMILY HOME LICENSING ommend administrative actions necessary to achieve the following long— NEW SECTION. Sec. 14 The legislature finds that adult family term care reforms: homes are an important part of the states long—term care system. Adult (a) The systematic coordination, planning, budgeting,and administra- family homes provide an alternative to institutional care and promote a high tion of long—term care services currently administered by the department of degree of independent living for residents. social and health services, division of developmental disabilities, aging and adult services administration, division of vocational rehabilitation, office on NEW SECTION_Sec. 15. The purposes of this chapter arc to: AIDS, division of health, and the bureau of alcohol and substance abuse; (1) Encourage the establishment and maintenance of adult family (b) Provision of long—term care services to persons based on their homes that provide a humane, safe, and homelike environment for persons ' functional disabilities noncategorically and in the most independent living with functional limitations who need personal and special care; situation consistent with the person's needs; (2) Establish standards for regulating adult family homes that ade- (c) A consistent definition of appropriate roles and responsibilities for quately protect residents, but are consistent with the abilities and resources 1 of an adult family home so as not to discourage individuals_from servingas state and local government, regional organizations, and' private organize- tions in the planning, administration, financing, and delivery of long—term adult family home providers; and care services; (3) Encourage consumers,families, providers,and the public to become (d) Technical assistance to enable local communities to have greater active in assuring their full participation in development of adult family participation and control in the planning, administration, and provision of homes that provide high quality care. long--term care services; NEW SECTION. Sec_ 16. Unless the context clearly requires other- (e) A case management system that coordinates an appropriate and wise, the definitions in this section apply throughout this chapter_ cost—effective plan of care and services for eligible functionally disabled (1) 'Adult family home' means a regular family abode of a person or persons based on their individual needs and preferences; persons who are providing personal care, room, and board to more than one (f) A sufficient supply of quality noninstitutional residential alterna- but not more than four adults who are not related by blood or marriage to tives for functionally disabled persons, and supports for the providers of the person or persons providing the services; except that a maximum of six such services; adults may be permitted if the department determines that the home is of (g) Public and private alternative funding for long—term care services, adequate size and that the home and the provider arc capable of meeting such as federal Title XIX funding of personal care services through the standards and qualifications as provided for in this act. limited casualty program for the medically needy and other optional ser- • (2) 'Provider" means any person who is licensed under this chapter to -}vices, a uniform fee scale for client participation in state—funded, long—term operate an adult family home. The provider shall reside at the adult family care programs, and private, long—term care insurance; home, except that exceptions may be authorized by the department for good (h) A systematic and balanced long—term care services payment and - cause, as defined in rule. reimbursement system, including nursing borne reimbursement, that will (3) 'Department" means the department of social and health services, provide access to needed services while controlling the rate of cost increases (4) 'Resident' means an adult in need of personal or special care in an for such services; adult family home who is not related to the provider. (i)Active involvement of volunteers and advocacy groups; - (5). 'Adults' means persons who have attained the age of eighteen (j) An integrated data base that provides long—term care client years. tracking; (6) "home" means an adult family home. (k) A coordinated education system for long—term care; and (7) "Imminent danger' means serious physical harm to or death of a (1) Other issues deemed appropriate by the implementation team. resident has occurred, or there is a serious threat to resident life, health, or ";y ; The commission shall report to the legislature with its findings, recorn- safety. ,' mendations,and proposed legislation by December 1, 1990. (8) "Special care' means care beyond personal care as defined by the department, in rule. . NEW SECTION. Sec. 17. The following residential facilities shall be exempt from the operation of this chapter: . (I) Nursing homes licensed under chapter 18.51 RCW; •"' ".',- `i7.1 .427 ' ' WASHINGTON LAWS, 1989 T' 3 .t WASHINGTON LOWS, 1989 :.1: '1. Ch. 427 s 0' chapterprovided in chapter 34.05 RCW by requesting a hearingin writingwithin Boarding homes licensed under 18.20 RCW `. i r: :. (3) Facilities approved and certified under chapter 71A.22 RCW; Pten days after receipt of the notice of denial. (4) Residential. treatment centers for the mentally ill licensed under (5) A provider shall not be licensed for more than one adult famil chapter 71.24 RCW; y home. Exceptions may be authorized by the department for good cause, as (5) Hospitals licensed under chapter 70.41 RCW; defined in rule. The department shall submit to appropriate committees of (6) Homes for the developmentally disabled licensed under chapter' i the legislature by December 1, 1991, a report 74_l5 RCW. on be number and type of . _ good cause exceptions granted. NEW SECTION. Sec. 18. (I) The department shall adopt rules and (6) The license fee shall be set at fifty dollars per year for each home. • standards,with respect to all adult family homes and the operators thereof A fifty dollar processing fee shall also be charged each home when the home ' to be licensed under this chapter to carry out the purposes and requirements is initially licensed. of this chapter. In developing rules and standards the department shall rec- NEW SECTION. Sec. 21. An adult family home shall have readily ognize the residential family—like nature of adult_family homes and not de- available for review: )velop rules and standards which by their complexity serve as an overly (1) Its license to operate;and restrictive barrier to the development of the adult family homes in the state. (2) A copy of each inspects©n report received by the home from the Procedures and forms established by the department shall be developed so I department for the past three years. 'they are easy to understand and comply with. Paper work requirements shall be minimal. Easy to understand materials shall be developed for NEW SECTION. Sec. 22. (1) A license shall be valid for one year. home explaining licensure requirements and procedures. (2) At Ieast ninety days prior to expiration of the license, the provider shall submit an application for renewal of a license. The department shall (2) During the initial stages of development of proposed rules, the de- send the provider an application for renewalprior to this time. The de rt partment shall provide notice of development of the rules to organizations pa ment shall have the authority to investigate any information • representing adult family homes and their residents, and other groups that in the the department finds appropriate. The notice shall state the subject of the application for renewal of a license. rules under consideration and solicit written recommendations regarding (3)(a) Homes applying for a license shall be inspected at the time of lieensure. their form and content. (3) Except where provided otherwise, chapter 34.05 RCW shall govern (b) Homes licensed by the department shall be inspected every eight- all department rule—making and adjudicative activities under this chapter. een months subject to available funds. (c) Licensed homes where a complaint has been received by the de- NEW SECTION. Sec. 19. After July 1, 1990, no person shall operate partment may be inspected at any time. or maintain an adult family home in this state without a license under this (4) If the department finds that the home is not in compliance with this chapter. chapter, it shall require the home to correct any violations as provided in NEW SECTION.Sec. 20. (1) An application for license shall be made this chapter. If the department finds that the home is in compliance with to the department upon forms provided by it and shall contain such infor- this chapter and the rules adopted under this chapter, the department shall oration as the department reasonably requires. renew the license of the home. (2) The department shall issue a license to an adult family home if the NEW SECTION, Sec. 21 (1) No public agency contractor or ern- department finds that the applicant and the home are in compliance with ployee shall place,refer, or recommend placement of a person into an adult this chapter and the rules adopted under this chapter;and that the applicant family home that is operating without a license. has no prior violations of this chapter relating to the adult family home (2)Any public agency contractor or employee who knows that an adult" subject to the application or any other adult family home, or of any other family home is operating without a license shall report the name and ad- law regulating residential care facilities within the past five years that re- dress of the home to the department. The department shall investigate any sulted in revocationof or nonrenewal a license. 1 report filed under this section. , (3) The license fee shall be submitted with the application. I NEW SECTION. Sec. 24. An adult familyhomeprovider shall have (4) The department shall serve upon the applicant a copy of the deci- the following minimum qualifications: p sion granting or denying an application for a license. An applicant shall have the right to contest denial of his or her application for a license as (1) Twenty-one years of age or older; (2) Good moral and responsible character and reputation; ti•'YCliii .427 WASHINGTON LAWS, 1989 WASHINGTON LAWS, „�` areas to include issues affecting the hen �� (3) Literacy;and C health, mental health, nutrition, and by- ' • (4) Management and administrative ability to carry out the require- i gieae of residents as well as other areas pertinent to the care of residents or ' ;'�tX, ,meats of this chapter_ of the home The department of social and health services shall provide a re- :: ...',.;•., *NEW SECTION Sec. 2 The department shall promulgate a list of port to the loq�-terffi care commission byDecember 1, I?91, on the zppro- residents' rights for adult family homes, by rule, which shall be equal to those priate provider training and education on adult family homes. '!!'' In rule as of January I, 1989. *See.29 Was roetoed,sec atssage at end of chapter. •. r,*Sec_25 was vetoed,see message at end of chapter. NEW SECTION_ Sec. 30. (1) During inspections of an adult family NEW SECTION. Sec. 26. (1) Adult family homes shall be maintained home, the department shall have access and authority to examine areas and internally and externally in good repair and condition. Such homes shall articles in the home used to provide care or support to residents, including ' have safe and functioning systems for heating, cooling, hot and cold water, residents' records,accounts, and the physical premises, including the build- electricity, plumbing, garbage disposal, sewage, cooking, laundry, artificial ings, grounds, and equipment. The department also shall have the authority : _• and natural light, ventilation, and any other feature of the home_ to interview the provider and residents of an adult family home. (2) Adult family homes shall be maintained in a clean and sanitary (2) Whenever an inspection is conducted, the department shall prepare manner, including proper sewage disposal, food handling, and hygiene a written report that summarizes all information obtained during the in- practiees. spection, and if the home is in violation of this chapter, serve a copy of the • (3) Adult family homes shall develop a fire drill plan for emergency inspection report upon the provider at the same time as a notice of violation_ evacuation of residents, shall have smoke detectors in each bedroom where a Ff the home is not in violation of this chapter, a copy of the inspection re- resident is located, shall have fire extinguishers on each floor of the home, port shall be mailed to the provider within ten days.of the inspection of the • •and.shall not keep nonambulatory patients above the first floor of the home_ home. All inspection reports shall be made available to the public at the • - • •(4) Adult family homes shall have clean, functioning, and safe house- department during business hours. hold items and furnishings. (3) The inspection report shall describe any corrective measures on the (5)• Adult family homes shall provide a nutritious and balanced diet ` . part of the provider necessary to pass a reinspection. If the department finds and shall recognize residents' needs for special diets. - upon reinspection of the home that the corrective measures have been satis- . (6) Adult family homes shall establish health care procedures for the factorily implemented, the department shall cease any actions taken against the home. Nothing in this section shall require the department to license or care of residents including medication administration and emergency medi- cal care. renew the Iicense of a home where serious physical harm or death has oc- (a) Adult family home residents shall be permitted to self-administer curved to a resident. SECTION. Sec. 3I. I medications. NEW { } The department IS authorized to take l' • • (b) Adult family home providers may administer medications and de- -• one or more of the actions listed in subsection(2) of this section in any case • . liver.special care only to the extent that the provider is a licensed health ' '. in which the department finds that an adult family home provider has: care professional for whom the administration of medications is within the 4`. (a) Failed or refused to comply with the requirements of this chapter scope of practice under Washington law. or the rules adopted under this chapter; NEW SECTION. Sec. 27_ Each adult family home shall meet appli- - - (b) Operated an adult family home without a license or under a re- cable local licensing, zoning, building, and housing codes, and state and to- - voked license; cal fire safety regulations. It is the responsibility of the home to check with ' ' : (c) Knowingly or with reason to know made a false statement of ma- local authorities to ensure all local codes are met. '2.i .. serial fact on his or her application for license or any data attached thereto, • NEW SECTION.Sec. 28. Whenever possible adult family homes are _ or in any matter under investigation by the department;or 4. encouraged to contact and work with local quality assurance projects such _.i-'._ E: (d) Willfully prevented or interfered with any inspection or investiga- '' as'the volunteer ombudsman with the goal of assuring high quality care is .. tion by the department. provided in the home_ - (2) When authorized by subsection (1) of this section, the department •'- ; - may take one or more of the following actions: 'NEW SECTION. Sec. 29. The department shall develop written tram- ' is ° i - (a) Refuse to issue a license; ing material to distribute to adult family home providers. The material shall explain licensure regnirements.established by this chapter and cover other .4.r. -- :�, (b) Suspend, revoke,or to renew a license; or (c) Suspend admissionss to the adult family home. mir '.41 •-r61,. 427 WASHINGTON LAWS, 1989 WASHINGTON LAWS, 1989 Ch. 427 L. ',':. NEW SECTION. Sec. 32. The department has the authority to im- that such changes are necessary,or shall notify the department of commu- ;.,'.. ' .,mediately suspend a license if it finds that conditions there constitute an nity development as to why such implementing ordinances were not imminent danger to residents. adopted. NEW SECTION. Sec. 33. Nothing in this chapter or the rules adopt- NEW SECTION. Sec. 37. A new section is added-to chapter 35A.63 ed under it may be construed as authorizing the supervision, regulation, or RCW to read as follows: control of the remedial care or treatment of residents in any adult family Each municipality that does not provide for the siting of residential home conducted by and for the adherents of a church or religious denomi- care facilities in zones or areas that are designated for single family or other nation who rely upon spiritual means alone through prayer for healing in residential uses, shall conduct a review of the need and demand for the fa- accordance with the tenets and practices of such church or religious de- cilities, including the cost of any conditional or special use permit that may nomination and the bona fide religious beliefs genuinely held by such be required. The review shall be completed by August 31, 1990. A copy of ' adherents. the findings, conclusions, and recommendations resulting from the review *NEW SECTION. Sec. 34. Section 11, chapter 172, Laws of 1969 ex. shall be sent to the department of community development by September ' seas., section 1, chapter 52, Laws of 1975--'76.2nd ex. sess. and RCW 74- 30, 1990, - ' .0&044 are each repealed On or before June 30, 1991, each municipality that plans and zones *Sec,34 was vetoed,see message at end of chapter. under this chapter shall have adopted an ordinance or ordinances that are necessary to implement the findings of this review, if the findings indicate V1. RESIDENTIAL CARE FACILITY SITING that such changes are necessary, or shall notify the department of Cornmu- *NEW SECTION. Sec. 35. {1) Unless the context clearly requires pity development as ko why such implementing ordinances were not otherwise, these definitions shall apply throughout this section and sections adopted. • 3ti` 37, 38 33, 40, and 41 of this act NEW SECTION. Sec. 38. A new section is added to chapter 36.70 (a)"Adult family home" means a residential care facility that is mein RCW to read as follows: iated by the department of social and health services Each county that does not provide for the siting of residential care fa- (b) "Residential care facility" means a facility that cares for at least cilities in zones that are designated for single family or other residential fire, but not more than fifteen functionally disabled persons uses, shall conduct a review of the need and demand for the facilities, in- i (c) Departrmenr means the department of social and health services eluding the cost of any conditional or special use permit that may be re- (2) An adult family home shall be considered a residential use of prop- quired. The review shall be completed by August 30, 1990. A copy of the erty for zoning purposes. Adult family homes shall be a permitted use in all • findings, conclusions, and recommendations resultingfrom the review shall F. areas zoned for residential or commercial purposes, including areas zoned for , be sent to the department of community development by September 30, , , single family dwellings.. 1990. 'See.35 was vetoed,see message at end at chapter_ On or before June 30, 1991, each municipality that plans and zones i NEW SECTION. Sec. 36. A new section is added to chapter 35.63 under this chapter shall have adopted an ordinance or ordinances that are lRCW to read as follows: necessary to implement the findings of this review, if the findings indicate i Each municipality that does not provide for the siting of residential that such changes are necessary, or shall notify the department of commu- care facilities in zones or areas that are designated for single family or other nity development as to why such implementing ordinances were not residential uses, shall conduct a review of the need and demand for the.fa- adopted. cilities, including the cost of any conditional or special use permit that may NEW SECTION. Sec. 39. A new section is added to chapter 35.22 be required. The review shall be completed by August 31, 1990. A. copy of RCW to read as follows: the findings, conclusions, and recommendations resulting from the review If a first class city zones pursuant to its inherent charter authority and shall be sent to the department of community development by September not pursuant to chapter 35.63 RCW, and does not provide for the siting of 30, 1990. :,. residential care facilities in zones or areas that are designated for single On or before June 30, 1991, each municipality that plans and zones family or other residential uses, the city shall conduct a review of the need under this chapter shall have adopted an ordinance or ordinances that are and demand for the facilities, including the cost of any conditional or spe- necessary to implement the findings of this review, if the findings indicate cial use permit that may be required. The review shall be completed by Ch. 427 WASHINGTON LAWS, 1989 r WASHINGTON LAWS, 1989 Ch. 428 August 30, 1990. A copy of the findings, conclusions, and recommendations the application of the provision to other persons or circumstances is not resulting from the review shall be sent to the department of community de- affected_ velopment by September 34, 1990. NEW SECTION, Sec. 44. Sections 2 through 43 of this act are nee- On or before June 30, 1991, each municipality that plans and zones - essary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health,or safety, under this chapter shall have adopted an ordinance or ordinances that are or support of the state government and its existing public institutions, and necessary to implement the findings of this review, if the findings indicate shall take effect immediately. that such changes are necessary, or shall notify the department.of commu- nity development as to why such implementing ordinances were not NEW SECTION_ Sec. 45. Sections 2, 3, 9, 11, 13, and 35 of this act adopted. shall constitute a new chapter in Title 74 RCW. NEW SECTION_ Sec. 40. A new section is added to chapter 36.32 NEW SECTION. Sec. 46. Sections 14 through 33 of this act shall RCW to read as.follows: - constitute a new chapter in Title 70 RCW. If a county operating under home rule charter zones pursuant to its NEW SECTION. Sec. 47_ Subchapter headings as used in this act do �_ inherent charter authority and not pursuant to chapter 35.63 RCW, nor not constitute any part of the law_ )chapter 36.70 RCW, and that county does not provide for the siting of res- Passed the House April 23, 1989. idential care facilities in zones or areas that are designated for single family Passed the Senate April 23, 1989. or other residential uses, the county shall conduct a review of the need and Approved by the Governor May 14, 1989, with the exception of certain demand for the facilities,including the cost of any conditional or special use items which were vetoed. permit that may be required_ The review shall be completed by August 30, Filed in Office of Secretary of State May 14, 1989_ 1990. A copy of the findings, conclusions, and recommendations resulting Note:Governor's.explanation of partial veto is as follows: from the review shall be sent to the department of community development 'I am returning herewith, without my approval as to section 25, 29, 34 and 35, by September 30, 1990. Engrossed Substitute House Bill No. 1968 entitled: On or before June 30, 1991, each municipality that plans and zones . 'AN ACT Relating to long term care.' under this chapter shall have adopted an ordinance or ordinances that are Section 25 requires the Department of Social and Health Services to promulgate rules regarding ad¢E[ family home resident rights, but limits the rules by requiring necessary to implement the findings of this review, if the findings indicate them to be 'equal' to those already in place.Senior advocates and caregivers may that such changes are necessary, or shall notify the department of commu- recommend the expansion or modification of resident rights, and the department nity development as to why such implementing ordinances were not would be prohibited from responding under this language. adopted. Section 29 requires the department to create a written training program for adult family home operators and to report to the Legislature. No appropriation is NEW SECTION.Sec. 41. The department of community development Evade to carry out the requirements of this section. ihadl: Section 34 repeals the rule-making authority the department needs to regulate (1) Report to the appropriate committees of the legislature the results congregate care facilities. of the local reviews provided for in sections 36 through 40 of this act by • Section 35 is a preemptive zoning statute that designates residential facilities December 31, 1990. serving up to 15 persons as permitted uses under local zoning statutes_The language {Z} In consultation with the association of Washington cities, the is overly broad and vague as written and may present a problem to local govern- meals. The Legislature will receive a report from all local governments on the need Washington association of counties, and the long—term care commission, for these facilities in 1990. develop a model ordinance for the siting of residential care facilities. The With the exception of sections 25, 29, 34 and 35, Engrossed Substitute Hw v r model ordinance shall be developed by December 31, 19.90. . • Bill No. 1968 is approved.' NEW SECTION. Sea. 42. The stun of one hundred fifty thousand ' dollars, or as much thereof as may be necessary, is appropriated for the bi- ennium ending June 30, 1991, from the general fund to the senate and - . CHAPTER 428 house of representatives solely for the long—term care commission created [[louse Bill No_ 16561 under section 13 of this act. CONDOMINIUMS—WARRANT/ES OF QUALITY AND CREATION OF CONDOMINIUM STUDY COMMITTEE NEW SECTION. Sec. 43. If any provision of this act or its application AN ACT Relating to the regulation of the sale of lands;creatin new sections;and o- to any person or circumstance is held invalid, the remainder of the act or viding an effective date. $ Pr 13346 1 _, r 1srr t 1110 July ly. 1990 likenton City Council Minutes Page 218 Councilman Stredicke pointed out that one of the changes in the TIP proposed by the Transportation Committee was the Transit Study which is the result of the downtown Renton program and citizens who have indicated a need for public transportation. Darrel Igelmund, 3602 Lake Washington Boulevard, Renton, expressed appreciation to the Transportation Systems Manager for the work that has been put into the TIP. He commented that it would be helpful to know which projects on the priority list have some expediency based on law or mitigation required of developers by the City. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY MATHEWS, COUNCIL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. CARRIED. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY EDWARDS, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE 1991-1996 SIX-YEAR TRANSPORTATION PLAN AND REFER THIS MATTER TO THE WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE WITH THE CHANGE THAT WAS OFFERED BY COUNCIL. CARRIED. AUDIENCE COMMENT Ralph Evans, 3306 NE 11 th Place, Renton, referred to a letter read into the Citizen Comment: Evans record on July 9, 1990, questioning issuance of building permits for the Good - Good Shepherd Group Shepherd group home on 19th and Shelton. He claimed that by issuing Home Rezone (NE 19th permits the City is violating terms of restrictive covenants which require that Street), R-010-88 the property be developed within one year, and has not resolved the issue of separation of church and state by HUD. He also complained of slow response to his letters by Administration; claimed there are inaccuracies in Mr. Nyberg's letter regarding time allowances for development after approval of the rezone; and suggested that building permits issued for the project be revoked until the issues are resolved. He urged that the City contact HUD and not Good Shepherd for information regarding the issue of separation of church and state. Mayor Clymer stated that the matter is being reviewed, and that he will report to the Council as soon as he has definitive information on this matter. Citizen Comment: Staley Karen Staley, P.O. Box 3407, Federal Way, reported an inability to sell - Grady Way property on Grady Way subsequent to rezone of that property to Manufacturing Park manufacturing park during Area-wide Valley rezoning in April 1986. Mayor Rezone Clymer asked Ms. Staley to discuss aggregation of the property with other owners in the area, and invited her and other owners to meet with him to discuss this matter. CONSENT AGENDA Items on the consent agenda are adopted by one motion which follows the listing. Claim: Tilzer, CL-43-90 Claim for damages in the amount of $486.97, filed by David Tilzer, 650 Stevens Avenue NW, Renton, for damage to left quarter panel on pickup truck, alleged caused by City operated truck (6/14/90). Refer to City Attorney and insurance service. Latecomer Agreement: Finance/City Clerk submitted request for a five-year extension to the James Davis, NE 20th Street, E. Davis latecomer agreement (W-480) for water improvements, NE 20th (#W-480) Street (SE 104th Street) from Duvall Avenue NE due east approximately 800 feet. The original latecomer agreement was granted on August 20, 1980, for a period of ten years with option for one five year extension. Refer to Utilities Committee and Public Works Department. WSDOT: Certification of Finance/City Clerk reported receipt of certification from the Washington State Highway Routes & State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) of State Highway Routes and Limited Access Facilities notification of limited access facilities on the State Routes of the State Highway Systems (on file with City Clerk). Information only. Planning: Condominium Finance/City Clerk reported condominium conversion notice has been filed Conversion, Heritage by Renton Apartment Associates for 30 apartment units located at 1626 Grant Village, 1626 Grant Avenue South, Heritage Village Condominiums. Information only. Avenue South Annexation: Duncan Planning Division requested public hearing be set on August 6, 1990, for Council to hold the second of two required public hearings to consider imposition of R-1, single family residential, zoning on the Duncan Annexation property, 42.54 acres located at NE 44th Street and 110th Avenue SE; annexation approved on June 25, 1990, by adoption of Ordinance #4275. Council concur. iuly 5. 1990 -`,.Renton City Council Minutes l Pane 221 Transportation Transportation Committee Chairman Stredicke announced that beginning Committee: Meeting Thursday, July 18, 1990, the Transportation Committee will meet each Schedule Revision Thursday at 4:30 p.m. The third Thursday of each month will be devoted to aviation matters. NEW BUSINESS MOVED BY MATHEWS, SECONDED BY EDWARDS, COUNCIL MAKE Council: Meeting THE FOLLOWING CHANGES IN ITS MEETING SCHEDULE: AUGUST Schedule 27 MEETING CANCELLED; SEPTEMBER 10, REGULAR MEETING; SEPTEMBER 17, ABBREVIATED MEETING; AND SEPTEMBER 24, REGULAR MEETING. CARRIED. ADMINISTRATIVE Referred 7/2/90 - Mosquito Abatement Program: Letter from Council REPORT President Mathews to Ms. Christine Gregoire, Director of the Department of CAG: 90-047, Mosquito Ecology (DOE), requesting DOE expedite the mosquito spray permit for the • Abatement Program City of Renton mosquito abatement program. Mayor Clymer announced that the State permit for spraying the mosquitos in the Panther Creek wetland at the base of Talbot Hill was received on Thursday, July 12, 1990, and the City commenced spraying on Friday, July 13. Rezone: Good Shepherd Referred 6/11/90 - Letter from Ralph Evans citing reversionary clause in Group Home, NE 19th rezone ordinance for Good Shepherd group home (NE 19th Street and Shelton Street, R-88-010 Avenue NE) which required reversion of zoning if property does not develop within one year: Memorandum from Ken Nyberg, Community Development Director, stated that Mr. Evans was correct in his assertion that the Good Shepherd Home was required to accomplish some things within one year of the rezoning of the site. He further reported that the City Zoning Ordinance gives an applicant two years to develop a project, and during that time, the applicant must demonstrate acceptable progress, such as securing building permits, funding commitments, and beginning construction activities. He said Good Shepherd was granted one year to obtain building permits and funding commitments, and if they achieved these two objectives within that time, they would have a subsequent year to begin construction. Mr. Nyberg further stated that Good Shepherd satisfied the first year objectives, and now has a second year to begin construction. Planning: Bockelmann Referred 6/25/90 - Letter from Ruth Bockelmann requesting change in area Request for City of influence line between Renton and Bellevue: Memorandum dated June 9, Boundary Revision, SE 1990, from City of Bellevue Planning Director Bruce Freeland and Principal 60th to SE 69th Streets Planner Robert Odle to Bellevue Mayor Lukens and Council members, stating that a petition was received from the residents of the China Creek area requesting a modification of the sphere of influence boundary, so that China Creek could annex to the City of Bellevue. The memo also stated that the Bellevue staff recommended the City of Bellevue Council decline the request. Further, a memorandum to Mayor Clymer from Public Works Director Lynn Guttmann stated that the Public Works Department concurred with the City of Bellevue recommendation that a modification of the sphere of influence line is not appropriate at this time. Referencing the aforementioned letters recommending that the sphere of influence boundary between Renton and Bellevue not be changed, it was MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY EDWARDS, THAT THE SPHERE OF INFLUENCE LINE BETWEEN RENTON AND BELLEVUE NOT BE CHANGED AT THIS TIME. CARRIED. The City Clerk will notify Mrs. Bockelmann of the Council's action on this matter. AUDIENCE COMMENT Ralph Evans, 3306 NE 11 th Place, Renton, commended the City Clerk's Citizen Comment Evans office for the detail and format of the Council minutes, and suggested that - Roster of Boards & schedules of boards, commissions, and citizens' advisory committees be Commissions Meetings included as an attachment to the Council minutes for citizen information. ADJOURNMENT MOVED BY MATHEWS, SECONDED BY ZIMMERMAN, COUNCIL ADJOURN. CARRIED. Time 9:41 p.m. 1 ele " MARILYN J. P:!41 RSEN, CMC, City Clerk Recorder: Nancy Mills 07/16/90 r' I' -- MAYOR'S ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT RESPONSE TO CITY COUNCIL INQUIRIES AND CITIZENS CONCERNS JULY 16, 1990 SUBJECT DATE Letter from Ralph Evans citing reversionary clause in rezone ordinance for Good Shepherd group home (Shelton Avenue NE) which required reversion of zoning if property does not develop within one year. June 11, 1990 Letter from Ruth Bockelmann requesting change in area of influence line between Renton and Bellevue. June 25, 1990 Staff asked to write letter to be signed by Council President Mathews to the Department of Ecology to expedite mosquito spray permit in Renton. July 2, 1990 } RENTON CITY COUNCIL Abbreviated Meeting June 11, 1990 Municipal Building Monday, 7:30 p.m. Council Chambers MINUTES CALL TO ORDER Mayor Earl Clymer led the Pledge of Allegiance to the flag and called the meeting of the Renton City Council to order. ROLL CALL OF TONI NELSON, COUNCIL PRESIDENT PRO TEMPORE; ROBERT COUNCIL MEMBERS EDWARDS, RICHARD M. STREDICKE, KATHY KEOLKER-WHEELER, JESSE TANNER, THERESA ZIMMERMAN. MOVED BY NELSON, SECONDED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, COUNCIL EXCUSE ABSENT COUNCIL PRESIDENT NANCY MATHEWS. CARRIED. • CITY STAFF IN EARL CLYMER, Mayor; JOHN E. WEBLEY, Acting Executive Assistant; ATTENDANCE ZANETTA FONTES, Assistant City Attorney; MARILYN J. PETERSEN, City Clerk; LARRY SPRINGER, Planning Manager; LIEUTENANT PETE ADAMS, Police Department; DAVE TIBBOT, Customer Services Manager PRESS ,Tina Hilding, Valley Daily News APPROVAL OF MOVED BY NELSON, SECONDED BY ZIMMERMAN, COUNCIL COUNCIL MINUTES APPROVE THE MINUTES OF JUNE 4, 1990. CARRIED. i AUDIENCE COMMENT Ralph Evans, 3306 NE l lth Place, Renton, 98056, called attention to Hearing • Citizen Comment: Evans Examiner's Report on Good Shepherd group home rezone, 19th and Shelton, , - Good Shepherd Group dated July 15, 1988, Condition 3, which stated, "The execution of restrictive Home (NE 19th Street), covenants that state the failure to develop the property according to the terms R-010-88 of the Conditional Use Permit within one year, or to otherwise abandon the specific Conditional Use Permit, or to discontinue this group home for any reason, shall cause the property to revert to its prior R-1 zoning classification." Mr. Evans asked why action has not been initiated for the reversion of the Good Shepherd property, since development has not started and the specified time restriction of one year has expired. Citizen Comment: Webb - Sandy Webb, 430 Mill Avenue South, Renton, praised the Council for its Commendation - current performance and encouraged its continuance for the benefit of the City of Renton. CONSENT AGENDA Items on the consent agenda are adopted by one motion which follows the listing: Claim: Marsh, CL-35-90 Claim for damages in the amount of $569.15 filed by Les Marsh, 2603 - 230th Avenue N.E., Redmond, for damage to tires and alignment on vehicle allegedly caused from City allowing traffic to pass through a road repair area prior to hardening of asphalt. (5/25/90) (CL-35-90). Refer to City Attorney and insurance service. Claim: Brown, CL-36-90 Claim for damages in the amount of $587.21 filed by David Brown, 16123 SE 146th Place, Renton, for damage to hood on vehicle allegedly caused by a golf ball from Maplewood Golf Course in area where protective netting was down. (5/17/90) (CL 36-90). Refer to City Attorney and insurance service. WSDOT: I-405 S-Curve Public Works Department recommended approval of Washington State Project Department of Transportation (WSDOT) acquisition of two parcels of Park Department property for the I-405 S-Curves project, located between the • \\✓ railroad tracks and Renton Avenue South at the base of Renton Hill, and south of I-405 in Cedar River Park. Refer to Transportation Committee. CAG: 89-085, Renton Parks Department submitted CAG-085-89, Interior Improvements to the Municipal Building Renton Municipal Building project; and requested approval of the project, Interior Improvement authorization for final pay estimate, commencement of 30-day lien period, Project and release of retained amount of $6,753.53 to contractor, Briere Skoegard General Contractors, if all required releases have been received. Council concur. CITY OF RENTON DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ill i l 1990 MEMORANDUM DATE: June 20,. 1990 TO: E 1 Clyme , ayor FROM: ' neth E. Nyberg, Director SUBJECT:.. Good Shepherd of Washington, N.E. 19th Street and Shelton Avenue (Ref#90-062) STAFF CONTACT: Larry Springer, Ext. 6185 Lenora Blauman, Ext. 2550 • This memorandum is written in response to your request for a reply to a letter from Ralph M. Evans (June 11, 1990) requesting information/clarification on the above- referenced project. Mr. Evans is correct in his assertion that the Good Shepherd Home was required to accomplish some things within one year of the rezoning of the site. However, as is outlined below, it was a typical requirement. The City Zoning Ordinance gives an applicant two years to develop (e.g., make acceptable progress on) a project. The code views this as a reasonable time based upon the complexity of obtaining necessary permits, agreements, construction contracts, and completing other required pre-construction/pre-occupancy activities. Acceptable progress, during the traditional two year development period, would include securing of building permits, funding commitments and the beginning of construction activities (e.g., foundations, structural underpinnings). In the case of Good Shepherd, staff recommended to the Hearing Examiner and he approved, the imposition of an additional deadline in order to encourage this lay group to launch the complex development process in'a timely manner. The requirement was that within one year the applicant would obtain building permits and funding commitments. If they achieved these first two objectives, then they would have a subsequent year to begin construction, (e.g., foundations and structural underpinnings). In fact, Good Shepherd did satisfy their first year objectives in that they have a commitment of funds and they have received their building permit. The now have a second year to break ground and begin construction. In short, the applicant satisfied the one year requirement, has made reasonable progress toward the completion of the project, and is anticipated to fulfill all typical development expectations within a standard two year period. Under no circumstances is this or any applicant required to completely finish a project. (e.g., occupancy permits) within two years let alone within one year. If you would like additional information please contact Larry Springer at Extension 6185. City of Renton Public Works Department/Community Development Department Memorandum Date: July 11, 1990 To: Earl Clymer, Mayor From: Lynn Guttmann, Director Staff Contact: Donald K. Erickson, AICP Principal Planner (2550) Lenora Blauman, Project Manager (2550) Subject: Good Shepherd of Washington Group Home, N.E. 19th Street at Shelton Avenue, (R-010-88) This memorandum is written for the purpose of responding to a letter from Ralph Evans (dated July 3,1990) , expressing concerns about the above-referenced project. Mr. Evans has asked "why the City wasn't taking the action the ordinance required" for returning this property to R-1 zoning classification. Staff report that Good Shepherd has met City standards for development based upon the fact that the applicant obtained a building permit prior to April 24, 1990 and received initial/conditional funding commitments as well. No extension of time was necessary to achieve these goals. The City has not traditionally defined "development" as requiring construction activities to be completed and/or a Certificate of Occupancy to be issued; the applicant was not mandated to meet such requirements to prior to April 24, 1990. Thus, staff believe that there is no cause for the City to move toward rezoning of the site at this time. In response to Mr. Evans' question concerning the timing for the issuance of building permits, staff report that all application materials were fully reviewed by various departments and found to comply with requirements for the issuance of such permits on April 20, 1990. Staff note that a funding commitment is not a prerequisite for the issuance of building permits for any project. Mr. Evans' questions concerning issues related to separation of church and state have been referred to City Attorney, Lawrence Warren. He has reported to staff that he is satisfied that appropriate "separation of church and state" have been achieved; his written response is submitted under separate cover. Seattle Mortgage Company has reported a firm commitment to HUD funding, which should also serve to support the opinion that these issues have been resolved. In sum, staff report that the Good Shepherd is moving toward completion of the group home project in a manner which meets the objectives of the City for ensuring the timely development of a residence for six developmentally disabled adults. The time schedule for obtaining permits, funding, and construction bids is acceptable, appropriately reflecting the complexity of the project. The applicant will be expected to meet all conditions established in the building permit. As such, staff suggest that there is no cause for City action to revoke building permits and/or cause reversion of the property from G-1 zoning to R-1 zoning at this time. If you have further questions, please contact Donald Erickson or Lenora Blauman at 235-2550. J. RENTON CITY COUNCIL Abbreviated Meeting July 9, 1990 Municipal Building Monday, 7:30 p.m. Council Chambers MINUTES CALL TO ORDER Mayor Earl Clymer led the Pledge of Allegiance to the flag and called the meeting of the Renton City Council to order. ROLL CALL OF NANCY MATHEWS, President; TONI NELSON, THERESA ZIMMERMAN, COUNCIL MEMBERS JESSE TANNER, KATHY KEOLKER-WHEELER, RICHARD STREDICKE, ROBERT EDWARDS. CITY STAFF IN EARL CLYMER, Mayor; JOHN E. WEBLEY, Acting Executive Assistant; ATTENDANCE ZANETTA FONTES, Assistant City Attorney; MARILYN J. PETERSEN, City Clerk; DAN CLEMENTS, Finance Director; PRISCILLA PIERCE, Public Works/Community Development Administrative Analyst; LIEUTENANT DENNIS GERBER, Police Department. PRESS Tina Hilding, Valley Daily News; Anh Do, Seattle South Times. APPROVAL OF Correction to minutes of July 2, 1990: page 202, paragraph 7, margin title, to COUNCIL MINUTES read: "Library: Service to Non-City Residents." MOVED BY MATHEWS, SECONDED BY NELSON, COUNCIL APPROVE THE MINUTES OF JULY 2, 1990, AS CORRECTED. CARRIED. AUDIENCE COMMENT Ralph Evans, 3306 NE 11 th Place, Renton, referred to an inquiry he made at Citizen Comment: Evans the June 11, 1990, Council meeting regarding reversion of zoning on the - Good Shepherd Group Good Shepherd group home property at 19th and Shelton. He stated that by Home Rezone, NE 19th issuing building permits for this project, the City is violating terms of Street;.R-88-010;' restrictive covenants in Ordinance No. 4212 which required development of the property within one year, and that the City has not resolved the issue of separation of church and state by HUD. He asked for the official date of approval of the rezone, and requested the City revoke the building permits for this property until this issue is resolved. Citizen Comment: Vaupel Versie Vaupel, P. O. Box 755, Renton, questioned the issuance of building - Good Shepherd Group permits or use of City money.on the Good Shepherd project prior to Home Rezone, NE 19th determination on the issue of church and state separation. Council requested Street a full report from the Administration on this issue. CONSENT AGENDA Items on the consent agenda are adopted by one motion which follows the listing. Budget: 1990 Finance Department submitted 1990 housekeeping budget adjustments in the Housekeeping Ordinance total amount of $12,906,515.00 for Budget Amendment Ordinance. Refer to Ways and Means Committee. Budget: 1990 Reduction Finance Department submitted 1990 budget reduction in amount of Ordinance $736,579.00 to modify 1990 budget. Broad adjustment categories include: 1. $150,000.00 in unanticipated revenues; 2. A net cost of $14,932.00 for the Administrative reorganization and compensation survey; and 3. $601,511.00 reduction in expenditures for various departments. Refer to Ways and Means Committee. Public Works: West Finance/City Clerk reported 7/5/90 bid opening for West Kennydale sewer Kennydale Sewer extension; 4 bids; engineer's estimate: $402,446.57. Refer to Utilities Extension Committee. • Claim: Aames Floral, Claim for damages in the amount of $251.87 filed by Florence Carlo of CL-39-90 Aames Floral, 17650 140th Avenue SE, Renton, for replacement of windshield alleged broken by golf ball from Maplewood Golf Course due to downed protective netting (5/11/90). Refer to City Attorney and insurance service. C IC' . " • , CITY OF RENTON 3306 NE 11 t h Place • Renton, WA. 98056 JUL 3 1990 July 3, 1990. . Mr . Earl Clymer, Mayor; RECEIVED City of Renton, OITY CLERK'S OFFICE Municipal Building, 200 Mill Ave. South, Renton, WA. 98055. . Subject : Zoning of Good Shepherd property, 19th & Shelton. References : My question of June 11 , 1990, same subject. Memo to Earl Clymer, Mayor, from Ken Nyberg, dated June 20, 1990, same subject. Dear Mayor Clymer, During the Council meeting of June 11 , 1990 I asked why I had not • seen any activity on the part of the City to cause the reversion to R-1 zoning of the Good Shepherd property located at 19th St. and Shelton Ave. I did not, as Mr. Nyberg suggests, assert that the Good Shepherd was required to accomplish some things within one year. The original zoning ordinance specified that, and what was required was that the property be developed. I merely asked why the City wasn' t taking the action the ordinance required. Mr. Nyberg goes on to state that the City Zoning Ordinance gives an applicant two years to develop (e. g. , make acceptable 'progress on) a project. I don' t know what ordinance he is relating to, but the specific ordinance I quoted, #4212, states by means of a restictive covenant, that this property shall be devloped within one year, and there is no mention made of acceptable progress. It states that the property shall be developed. On the property at . this time no progress has been made. None ! The ground hasn' t even been cleared of growth in order to survey the site. Finally he says that " In fact, Good Shepherd did satisfy their first year objectives in that they have a commitment of funds and they have received their building permit". Be advised that the Good Shepherd does not have a commitment of funds even now. At the annual meeting of the Good Shepherd of Washington on_ June 27, 1990 it was announced that the local HUD office would be filing on about July 3, 1990 and a final commitment was expected between July 15th and Aug. 1st. Additionally, the building permits must have been issued prematurely since I have a copy of a memo to Mayor Clymer from Mr. Nyberg dated May 18, 1990 which says in effect, "The City has not been assured that questions relating to Church and State issues have been resolved". In short then, nothing of substance has been accommplished, but the City issued the building permits anyway. Now the staff is using the fact that the permits were issued as justification for a years' extention. During the various steps in the process over the years, we were constantly assured by Council that our interests were protected by the restrictive covenants. Nancy Mathews and John Reed both stated on more than one occasion that the home could be used only for the purpose specified and that deviation from the covenants would be cause for the property to revert to its prior zoning classification, and the alocated mon-._ would be reassigned to th.__ARenton Museum. That is to say, the property is to be; ( 1 ) used for a group home for not more than six developmentally disabled adults. and (2) be developed within one year. On at least two occasions I argued that reversionary clauses hadn' t worked in the past, but the Council , as always. prevailed. Now, it appears, that the restrictive covenants also were meaningless all along. What I am asking for is simply that the City honor its written and verbal commitment. I ask that the City promptly initiate action to cause the reversion of the zoning of the subject property to its prior R-1 classification as specified in City Ordinance #4212, and .as we were verbally assured it would be, by Council members repeatedly throughout 1988. I ask further that the City suspend or revoke the building permits issued to the Good Shepherd prematurely on April 20, 1990, until this matter is resolved. Thank you. . erely, / /19 /e:4mr, 7.. 'alph M. Evans. ( l..., cc: lir. R. A. Arbios, HUD. Mr. E. Ball . GSW. Mr . G. Sheehan, ACLU. r • i:et,)46,4,L;56-t-2 G- CITY OF RENTON MEMORANDUM DATE: July 10, 1990 TO: Mayor Earl Clymer Council Members FROM: Marilyn Petersen, City Clerk SUBJECT: Correspondence from Ralph Evans regarding Zoning of Good Shepherd Property, 19th and Shelton The attached correspondence was read into the record by Ralph Evans at the Council meeting of July 9, 1990. Copies were sent to you on July 5, 1990, prior to the meeting. This copy is being sent as a follow-up. cc: Lynn Guttmann Larry Springer Lenora Blauman RENTON CITY COUNCIL Abbreviated Meeting July 9, 1990 Municipal Building Monday, 7:30 p.m. Council Chambers MINUTES CALL TO ORDER Mayor Earl Clymer led the Pledge of Allegiance to the flag and called the meeting of the Renton City Council to order. ROLL CALL OF NANCY MATHEWS, President; TONI NELSON, THERESA ZIMMERMAN, COUNCIL MEMBERS JESSE TANNER, KATHY KEOLKER-WHEELER, RICHARD STREDICKE, ROBERT EDWARDS. CITY STAFF IN EARL CLYMER, Mayor; JOHN E. WEBLEY, Acting Executive Assistant; ATTENDANCE ZANETTA FONTES, Assistant City Attorney; MARILYN J. PETERSEN, City Clerk; DAN CLEMENTS, Finance Director; PRISCILLA PIERCE, Public Works/Community Development Administrative Analyst; LIEUTENANT DENNIS GERBER, Police Department. PRESS Tina Hilding, Valley Daily News; Anh Do, Seattle South Times. APPROVAL OF Correction to minutes of July 2, 1990: page 202, paragraph 7, margin title, to COUNCIL MINUTES read: "Library: Service to Non-City Residents." MOVED BY MATHEWS, SECONDED BY NELSON, COUNCIL APPROVE THE MINUTES OF JULY 2, 1990, AS CORRECTED. CARRIED. AUDIENCE COMMENT Ralph Evans, 3306 NE 11 th Place, Renton, referred to an inquiry he made at Citizen Comment: Evans the June 11, 1990, Council meeting regarding reversion of zoning on the - Good Shepherd Group Good Shepherd group home property at 19th and Shelton. He stated that by Home Rezone, NE 19th issuing building permits for this project, the City is violating terms of Street, R-88-010 restrictive covenants in Ordinance No. 4212 which required development of the property within one year, and that the City has not resolved the issue of separation of church and state by HUD. He asked for the official date of approval of the rezone, and requested the City revoke the building permits for this property until this issue is resolved. Citizen Comment: Vaupel Versie Vaupel, P. O. Box 755, Renton, questioned the issuance of building - Good Shepherd Group permits or use of City money on the Good Shepherd project prior to Home Rezone, NE 19th determination on the issue of church and state separation. Council requested Street a full report from the Administration on this issue. CONSENT AGENDA Items on the consent agenda are adopted by one motion which follows the listing. Budget: 1990 Finance Department submitted 1990 housekeeping'budget adjustments in the Housekeeping Ordinance total amount of $12,906,515.00 for Budget Amendment Ordinance. Refer to Ways and Means Committee. Budget: 1990 Reduction Finance Department submitted 1990 budget reduction in amount of Ordinance $736,579.00 to modify 1990 budget. Broad adjustment categories include: 1. $150,000.00 in unanticipated revenues; 2. A net cost of $14,932.00 for the Administrative reorganization and compensation survey; and 3. $601,511.00 reduction in expenditures for various departments. Refer to Ways and Means Committee. Public Works: West Finance/City Clerk reported 7/5/90 bid opening for West Kennydale sewer Kennydale Sewer extension; 4 bids; engineer's estimate: $402,446.57. Refer to Utilities Extension Committee. • Claim: Aames Floral, Claim for damages 'in the amount of $251.87 filed by Florence Carlo of CL-39-90 Aames Floral, 17650 140th Avenue SE, Renton, for replacement of windshield alleged broken by golf ball from Maplewood Golf Course due to downed protective netting (5/11/90). Refer to City Attorney and insurance service. .) RENT ON CITY nJF hal %,;,�, Finance Department X\ Earl Clymer, Mayor June 27, 1990 Mr. Ralph Evans 3306 NE 11th Place Renton, WA 98056 Re: Good_Shepheid Group Homes HUD Funds Dear Mr. Evans: As you previously requested, a copy of Mr. Ed Ball's response to a letter from the City is being transmitted to you. Please feel free to call if additional information is needed. Sincerely, Marilyn J. to n, CMC City Clerk 235-2502 Enclosure 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 CITY OF RENTON HOUSING AND HUMAN SERVICES MEMORANDUM DATE: June 25, 1990 TO: Marilyn Petersen City Clerk FROM: Ron Shelley S Acting Coordinator, Housing and Human Services SUBJECT: Good Shepherd Group Homes HUD Funds Mr. Ralph Evans, 3306 NE 11th P1, Renton, WA 98056, has requested a copy of Mr. Ed Ball's response to a letter from the City expressing concerns about the projects. A copy of the letter of response is enclosed for forwarding to Mr. Evans. CITY OF RENTON JUN .2 7 1990 RECEIVED CITY CLERK'S OFFICE y , • Tom` (~,ENED • Good Shepherd of Washington can 07 R-g1O . 13817 171st Ave. N.E. wsusING&HUMAN REsokab Redmond, WA 98052 John Morris, Coordinator - Community Development Department City of Renton 200 Mill Ave. South Renton, Washington 98055 Dear John: This letter is in response to your letter of May 1, 1990. First, let me say that I appreciate your kindness in allowing me to complete my spring travel schedule before attempting an answer. The content that follows correlates directly with the format and structure of your (May 1) letter: Issue: Religion Board and/or policy action has been taken on the religion issue as follows. Documentation is attached in appropriate cases. 1. In its meeting of May 29, 1990, The Good Shepherd of Washington (GSW) Board of Directors passed a resolution that states; "GSW represents that it is associated with Good Shepherd Lutheran Home of the West (GSLH) which is affiliated with a religious denominational institution." 2. GSW policy and/or practice in connection with providing management services is: a. GSW will comply with existing civil rights laws and regulations at both State and Federal levels as they pertain to employees or applicants for employment. This is also a matter of corporate policy in all facilities that are associated with GSLH (per Jim Johnson - GSLH Corporate Director of , Personnel). b. In its meeting on March 18, 1989, the GSLH Board of Directors passed a four point resolution that serves as basis for the policy that will be followed when GSW operations begin (see attachment A). c. In order to respond to this question I believe it is necessary to clarify what we understand the word "religion" to mean. Merriam-Webster employs a phrase that seems to be applicable here, i.e. "a cause, principle or system of beliefs held to with ardor and faith." In considering the several parts of your questions in the context of this definition, my answer also has several parts (quotes from your questions are underlined): - if. "religious instruction or counseling" were not provided, the principles of a moral society that are derived from Judaic religious law would not.be taught, including the wrongness of lying, theft, profanity or even murder. Conversely, we intend to provide whatever is necessary to instill honesty. and integrity in our residents. We consider the "conduct of religious worship or services" as well as participation therein, to be one of the prerogatives of the individual residents since such activities would be carried out in the confines of their home. Their own prerogatives will also govern their attendance at any religious service outside their.home. inasmuch as "proselytizing" implies coercion, GSLH and GSW do not believe in it and will not practice or allow it to take place. finally, our "influence" will be passive rather than active in character lest it become proselytization. By passive, we mean influence by exemplary conduct in loving 'and serving those that are developmentally handicapped. d. • In its meeting on June 16, 1989, the GSLH Board of Directors approved a proposed letter to .HUD that documents GSLH and GSW positions on this issue (see Attachment B). With respect to the foregoing points (a through c) in light of the Hab Bits article you cited, and its effect upon HUD and Block Grant requirements, our documented answers should explain our'position. I am sure that we can provide additional information if required. As we discussed, I am.sending copies of this response to R. Arbios of HUD, Vincent Tom of King county and Patti Carr of Bellevue. Issue: Revisions of By-Laws Both GSLH and GSW want to change the existing by-laws, subject, of course, to HUD and Block Grant requirements. The GSW Board, at its May.29, 1990 meeting, passed the following resolution; "That the spirit of the model HUD by-laws be adopted....that work begin as soon 'as practicable....and that a first draft be presented for (HUD) acceptance by the GSW Board, then to the GSLH Board for final acceptance and ratification....by the time the fourth group home is opened." Although prospective changes to the by-laws are conceptual at this point, I have discussed them personally and at some length with Dr. Geske of GSLH. While there are some minor differences in our thinking, I believe the major points will survive. There are four in number: Increase the number of GSW board members from five to seven. Clarify and distinguish between the GSW Board of Directors and the GSW membership at large from which board members are elected. Clarify the ratification of elected (and "appointed") board members. If GSLH has the authority to reject GSW electees, GSW should be given the same privilege with respect to GSLH appointees. Disallow proxy voting. We also believe that local representatives on the'GSW is vital. Of the five current board members, four are Washington residents, one is from Oregon. If we are successful in changing this number to seven, I would still believe that six of them should be from Washington and all of them from the Pacific Northwest. This is something that could be addressed in the by-law revision but I believe that it would be highly detrimental and impractical to operate with a board that is made up of out of state members. Issue: Service to Renton Residents The statement you cite from the original GSW application for Block Grant funds is still an accurate one. Although the statement is self explanatory, it is noteworthy that'GSLH, as a matter of long standing practice, has considered the proximity of residents and parents to be of great importance. This means that ideally, a large percentage of our future residents would come from Renton or at least King county. We will of course continue to be responsive to Case Management (Department of Developmentally Disabilities) referrals. Issue: Day to Day Management of the Facility Again, we stand on the intent of our.previous statement. Since then, our perspective and resultant planning have improved and while we still will insist upon the minimum education and experience qualifications listed, we now envision an area administrative manager/coordinator to oversee the four group homes to be built. Also, we are now doing exploratory work to determine where and what an area administrative center with record keeping and reporting capabilities should be. Issue: Client Profile Once more, the answer is yes. In addition to strict compliance with State of Washington policy for serving only the severely handicapped we will operate in accordance with our own working definition. While GSW is advertised as a ministry to the mentally retarded, there are cases where the handicap of mildly or moderately retarded persons (determined by I.Q. level) is compounded by the presence of a physical handicap such • as cerebral palsy or epilepsy. Also, our plan is to retain the language "prime emphasis on, but not limited to the severely handicapped" as we revise our by-laws. Call me if you need more information or additional clarification. Sinc.e'rely, 11/ Edward L. Ball President . AT/ 4 C1444&?`/r A F '>E I OF 2 GOOD SHEPHERD LUTHERAN HOME OF THE WEST ;11-7) RECEIVED PICADILLY INN 5115 East McKinley Avenue ,SUN 1 8 1990 Fresno, California r(pF Rc•IT0 BOARD OF DIRECTORS iiou er G&K�MAN�E80UR�ts ORGANIZATIONAL MEETING March 18, 1989 j MINUTES 1 Directors Present: Pat Arent Betty Dvsersdal Harold Meyer JoAnn Baden Mary Farley Bernard Pabst Doris Ballard Al Freitag Bee Steuve . Lowell Bartels Joe Forgatch Dave Teigen Charles Birner Lee Hagen Carolyn Tensmeyer John Conrad Dick Hillendahl Dave Theis Ed Deutschman Jack Lee Donald Well Director Absent: John Isaacson 1. Officers and Committee Chairmen for 1989-90. MSC THAT THE SECRETARY CAST THE BALLOT FOR THE SLATE OF OFFICERS AND COMMITTEE CHAIRMEN FOR 1989-90, AS FOL- LOWS: PRESIDENT Bernard Pabst VICE PRESIDENT Jack Lee SECRETARY Dave Teigen j TREASURER Harold Meyer ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE CHAIR Ed Deutschman HABILITATION COMMITTEE CHAIR Lowell Bartels RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT CHAIRMAN Charles Birner (1 2 . The Board adopted a religious policy statement for Good Shepherd of Washington, as follows: MSC GOOD SHEPHERD LUTHERAN HOME OF THE WEST . AND .GOOD SHEPHERD OF WASHINGTON RECOGNIZE AND RESPECT THE CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS OF EACH RESIDENT; THEREFORE, o NO RELIGIOUS BELIEF SHALL BE ESTABLISHED THAT A RESIDENT MUST FOLLOW, o NO RELIGIOUS DISCRIMINATION SHALL BE PRACTICED AGAINST A RESIDENT, 2) fF I /y LHt/ n.4 / Good Shepherd Lu. ran Home of the West `7.441. 2OP'2 Board of Directo Organizational Meeting March, 1989 - Page 2 JUL 13 1989 o NO RESIDENT SHALL BE COMPELLED TO PARTICIPATE IN ANY PARTICULAR RELIGIOUS ACTIVITY, AND o NO RESIDENT SHALL BE PROHIBITED FROM EXERCISING ANY OTHER RELIGIOUS BELIEFS. 3 . Retiring Board members Ruth Finkelstein, Dolores Malkow- Roth, Gerry Orman, Herb Theiss and Henry Thiel were acknowledged thanked for their faithful service to Good Shepherd Lutheran Home of the West. Respectfully submitted, Dave Tei en Secretary THESE MINUTES were duly read an approved with no additions and/or deletions this /6 day of , 19 c' , as follows: n cretary Recorded by PROFESSIONAL BUSINESS RESOURCES - (415) 672-8647 1!7 TACO-Wit: V / O , PAGE / aF2 Good Shepherd Lut:...4xan Home of the West Board of Directors Meeting June 1989 - Page 4 BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR IS HEREBY AUTHORIZED TO BORROW FROM THE BOARD- DESIGNATED FUNDS, EXCLUDING EL TORO PROCEEDS, AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED THE LESSER OF THE SHORTFALL OR $240, 000,, AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT THESE FUNDS SHALL BE IMMEDIATELY REPAID UPON THE RECEIPT OF THE SHORTFALL MONEY. 7. The depopulation at Terra Bella has resulted in two of the buildings becoming vacant. A resolu- tion to handle the accounting of these buildings was presented to the Board: MSC GOOD SHEPHERD SHALL NOT WRITE OFF THE VACANT UNITS AT TERRA BELLA AT THIS TIME. 8. Value Village. George Neumann and Dave Theis have been appointed by Dr. Pabst to explore the resolu- tion of differences between Good Shepherd and the Value Village management regarding the Long Beach store. In addition, c MSC THE BOARD AUTHORIZES THE APPOINTMENT OF DONNA SCHOESSOW TO THE VALUE VILLAGE MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE. 9. MSC GARALD ORMAN SHALL BE INVITED TO QUARTERLY BOARD MEETINGS FOR LEGAL GUIDANCE. 10. MSC BE IT RESOLVED BY THE GOVERNING BOARD AND HEREBY ORDERED THAT THE OFFICIALS WHOSE ' NAMES, TITLES AND SIGNATURES ARE LISTED BELOW [BOARD OFFICERS] SHALL BE AND ARE HEREBY AUTHORIZED AS OUR REPRESENTATIVES TO ACQUIRE FEDERAL SURPLUS PROPERTY FROM THE OREGON STATE AGENCY FOR SURPLUS PROPERTY UNDER THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS LISTED ON THE' "AUTHOR- IZATION OF PARTICIPANTS" FORM. (ADDENDUM 4) C. HABILITATION COMMITTEE - Carolyn Tensmeyer 1. Carolyn Tensmeyer, Chairman Pro-Tem, presented the Habilitation Committee's report to the Board. 2 . MSC with THE MAY 1989 LETTER TO HUD BY MR CROWLEY 2 dissen- GOOD SHEPHERD OF WASHINGTON ATTORNEY, BE ` tions APPROVED. (ADDENDUM 5) ' ' Y ATTA z5 /3:4 - 20� Z POLICY STATEMENT RE: RELIGIOUS ACTIVITY May 1989 Good Shepherd of Washington (GSW) is a non-profit corporation that seeks to develop group homes for the handicapped in the State of Washington. It has applied for loans to finance the development of the Group Home Projects from the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development . It likewise intends to enter into a management agree- ment with Good Shepherd Lutheran Home of the West (GSLH) a non- profit corporation, whose special function is to ' care for the devel- opmentally disabled/mentally retarded, without respect to race, sex, creed or national origin. The construction and operation of group homes for the developmen- tally disabled adults is facially a project with strictly a secular purpose in mind. However, to the Good Shepherd organizations , the care of the developmentally disabled is a vital function of its religious mission. The Good Shepherd organizations acknowledges that those who administer public funds view their activity as secu- lar. In order to ensure this perception, the Good Shepherd .organi- zations will make the necessary accommodations required by federal law. The posting of religious symbols or materials or religous activi- ties shall be limited to those which the residents might wish to have in their immediate living area . While the logo used by the GSLH can be construed to be a religious symbol ; however, this is the established name and logo of the' organization. Good Shepherd will respect the religious preferences of residents , encourage them to attend the church of their choice as well as respecting the wishes of those residents not desiring to attend any church. Good Shepherd of Washington BY Name/Title j Good Shepherd Lutheran Home of the West BY Name/Title Ca" June 18. 1990 Anton City Council Minutes Page 187 Ordinance #4274 An ordinance was read amending Chapter 10, Sales and Use Tax, of Title V Finance: Utility Tax of City Code by adding a new section 5-10-7 to establish a tax applicable to Collection for Brokered brokered natural gas sales. MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, Natural Gas Sales SECONDED BY ZIMMERMAN, COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS Ordinance READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. Ways and Means Committee Chairman Keolker-Wheeler presented the following ordinance for first reading: Annexation: Duncan An ordinance was read annexing certain property consisting 42.54 acres, bounded by Jones and Lincoln Avenues N.E., N.E. 43rd Street, 112th Avenue S.E. and N.E. 36th Street, to the City of Renton (Duncan Annexation; A- 001-89). MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY ZIMMERMAN, COUNCIL REFER THIS ORDINANCE BACK TO WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE FOR ONE WEEK. CARRIED. Ways and Means Committee Chairman Keolker-Wheeler presented the following resolution for reading and adoption: Resolution #2802 A resolution was read authorizing the Mayor to make formal application for Parks: Open Space Grant, funding assistance for an open space aquatic land enhancement account Aquatic Land project to the Department of Natural Resources. MOVED BY KEOLKER- Enhancement WHEELER, SECONDED BY ZIMMERMAN, COUNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS PRESENTED. CARRIED. Latecomer Agreement: The Ways and Means Committee concurred with the recommendation of the Heath/Check Properties, Public Works Department and recommended Council approve the subject NE 43rd Place and Jones latecomer agreement, Heath/Check Print Storm and Street Improvements, Avenue NE project numbers 2-1-40 and 17-2-13 on Jones Avenue NE, vicinity of NE 4rd Place. Per City of Renton Ordinance No. 4189, the duration of the agreement was set to be ten (10) years with the option to extend the agreement, for one time only, for a period of up to an additional five (5) years. The Ways and Means Committee recommended Council authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the agreement and that the City Clerk record the agreement with King County. MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY NELSON, COUNCIL ADOPT THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. NEW BUSINESS Councilman Stredicke summarized correspondence received from City Rezone: Good Shepherd Attorney Warren, which described the procedure required to revert zoning on group home (NE 19th Good Shepherd property located at 19th and Shelton Avenue NE, as required Street), R-010-88 r in the evisionary clause of the rezone ordinance. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, JUNE 15, 1990, lot X CORRESPONDENCE FROM CITY ATTORNEY WARREN TO THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL BE REFERRED TO ADMINISTRATION FOR REVIEW AND REPORT BACK TO COUNCIL. CARRIED. Public Works: In response to Councilman Stredicke's inquiry regarding the status of the Transportation Benefit traffic mitigation for N.E. 3rd and N.E. 4th Street, City Attorney Warren Zone, NE 3rd and NE advised that there had been an interim policy adopted (Resolution #2769, 4th Street adopted 10-2-89) which created a transportation benefit zone, and noted the Public Works Department was to follow-up with a more specific plan. Mayor Clymer advised that an administrative report will be prepared and forwarded to Council on this issue. AUDIENCE COMMENT Joan Walker, 1433 Monterey Avenue N.E., Renton, commended Mayor Citizen Comment: Walker Clymer on the proposed reorganization and recalled that the League of - City Hall Re- Women's Voters study of several years past suggested the need for changes Organization along similar lines. Citizen Comment: Walker Ms. Walker expressed great satisfaction in the clean-up efforts of the - City Clean-up Efforts downtown district that were organized by Councilwoman Nelson, and hoped future dates for clean-up would be scheduled. Councilwoman Nelson thanked all the individuals who contributed their time and effort to clean-up the downtown sector, and indicated another date will be scheduled the end of July. Executive Session MOVED BY MATHEWS, SECONDED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, COUNCIL CONVENE INTO EXECUTIVE SESSION TO DISCUSS NEGOTIATION ISSUES. CARRIED. Time 9:32 p.m. //-/i/;IIA.Q:Piriji/k -;-', , 4/e K CITN JF RENT ON ,.��=u .:t R ' Office of the City Attorney D 10 Earl Clymer, Mayor •June 15, 1990 TO: Mayor Earl Clymer v Renton City Council FROM: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney RE : Reversionary Procedure in Rezoning for Good Shepherd Dear Mr. Mayor and Council Members : The question was asked at the June 11, 1990 council meeting on the formalities necessary to return the zoning on the Good Shepherd parcels back to that it had enjoyed before its recent rezone. Apparently the rezone for the Good Shepherd project included a reversionary clause that would require the property be returned to. its prior zoning classification if the Good Shepherd project was not developed within a certain period of time . If the city has made a determination that the time period has run for the Good Shepherd development, then it must rezone the property to its prior designation. In order to do that, and to ensure compliance with the state zoning laws, the city must hold a public hearing and formally 'downzone the property by means of a zoning ordinance . It might be argued that a new public hearing is not necessary and that the public hearing under which the original rezoning was accomplished, could serve as the public hearing for this rezoning. However, in the exercise of caution, it would appear prudent to hold a public hearing just before adopting a new zoning ordinance . If you need any further information on this topic please feel free to contact me . Lawrenc J. Warren LJW: as . A8 . 57 : 21 . I Post Office Box 626 - 100 S 2nd Street -Renton, Washington 98057 - (206) 255-8678 lAPA- gairY toAt CITY RENTON �� '— °' Office of the City Attorney Rva l Earl Clymer, Mayor June 15, 1990 TO: Mayor Earl Clymer Renton City Council • FROM: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney RE: Reversionary Procedure in Rezoning for Good Shepherd Dear Mr. Mayor and Council Members : The question was asked at the June 11, 1990 council meeting on the formalities necessary to return the zoning on the Good Shepherd , parcels back to that it had enjoyed before its recent rezone. Apparently the rezone for the Good Shepherd project included a reversionary clause that would require the property be returned to its prior zoning classification if the Good Shepherd project was not developed within a certain period of time. If the city has made a determination that the time period has run for the Good Shepherd development, then it must rezone the property to its prior designation. In order to do that, and to ensure compliance with the state zoning laws, the city must hold a public hearing and formally downzone the property by means of a zoning ordinance. It might be argued that a new public hearing is not necessary and that the public hearing under which the original rezoning was accomplished, could serve as the public hearing for this rezoning. However, in the exercise of caution, it would appear prudent to hold a public. hearing just before adopting a new zoning ordinance. If you need any further information on this topic please feel free to contact me. Lawrenc J. Warren LJW:as . A8 . 57 :21 . Post Office Box 626 - 100 S 2nd Street-Renton,Washington 98057- (206) 255=8678 R-oio -89 RENTON CITY COUNCIL Abbreviated Meeting June 11, 1990 Municipal Building Monday, 7:30 p.m. Council Chambers MINUTES CALL TO ORDER Mayor Earl Clymer led the Pledge of Allegiance to the flag and called the meeting of the Renton City Council to order. ROLL CALL OF TONI NELSON, COUNCIL PRESIDENT PRO TEMPORE; ROBERT COUNCIL MEMBERS EDWARDS, RICHARD M. STREDICKE, KATHY KEOLKER-WHEELER, JESSE TANNER, THERESA ZIMMERMAN. MOVED BY NELSON, SECONDED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, COUNCIL EXCUSE ABSENT COUNCIL PRESIDENT NANCY MATHEWS. CARRIED. CITY STAFF IN EARL CLYMER, Mayor; JOHN E. WEBLEY, Acting Executive Assistant; ATTENDANCE ZANETTA FONTES, Assistant City Attorney; MARILYN J. PETERSEN, City Clerk; LARRY SPRINGER, Planning Manager; LIEUTENANT PETE ADAMS, Police Department; DAVE TIBBOT, Customer Services Manager PRESS Tina Hilding, Valley Daily News APPROVAL OF MOVED BY NELSON, SECONDED BY ZIMMERMAN, COUNCIL COUNCIL MINUTES APPROVE THE MINUTES OF JUNE 4, 1990. CARRIED. AUDIENCE COMMENT Ralph Evans, 3306 NE 11 th Place, Renton,98056, called attention to Hearing Citizen Comment: Evans Examiner's Report on Good Shepherd group home rezone, 19th and Shelton, - Good Shepherd Group dated July 15, 1988, Condition 3, which stated, "The execution of restrictive Home (NE 19th Street), covenants that state the failure to develop the property according to the terms R-010-88 of the Conditional Use Permit within one year, or to otherwise abandon the specific Conditional Use Permit, or to discontinue this group home for any reason, shall cause the property to revert to its prior R-1 zoning classification." Mr. Evans asked why action has not been initiated for the reversion of the Good Shepherd property, since development has not started and the specified time restriction of one year has expired. Citizen Comment: Webb - Sandy Webb, 430 Mill Avenue South, Renton, praised the Council for its Commendation current performance and encouraged its continuance for the benefit of the City of Renton. CONSENT AGENDA Items on the consent agenda are adopted by one motion which follows the listing: Claim: Marsh, CL-35-90 Claim for damages in the amount of $569.15 filed by Les Marsh, 2603 - 230th Avenue N.E., Redmond, for damage to tires and alignment on vehicle allegedly caused from City allowing traffic to pass through a road repair area prior to hardening of asphalt. (5/25/90) (CL-35-90). Refer to City Attorney and insurance service. Claim: Brown, CL-36-90 Claim for damages in the amount of $587.21 filed by David Brown, 16123 SE 146th Place, Renton, for damage to hood on vehicle allegedly caused by a golf ball from Maplewood Golf Course in area where protective netting was down. (5/17/90) (CL 36-90). Refer to City Attorney and insurance service. WSDOT: I-405 S-Curve Public Works Department recommended approval of Washington State Project Department of Transportation (WSDOT) acquisition of two parcels of Park Department property for the I-405 S-Curves project, located between the railroad tracks and Renton Avenue South at the base of Renton Hill, and south of I-405 in Cedar River Park. Refer to Transportation Committee. CAG: 89-085, Renton Parks Department submitted CAG-085-89, Interior Improvements to the Municipal Building Renton Municipal Building project; and requested approval of the project, Interior Improvement authorization for final pay estimate, commencement of 30-day lien period, Project and release of retained amount of $6,753.53 to contractor, Briere Skoegard General Contractors, if all required releases have been received. Council concur. ~ ( x/° ^ . [ Renton City Council Meeting, June 11tn 199O. Ralph Evans, 3306 NE 11th Place, Renton WA. 98056 Mr. Mayor, Members of the Council As you may recall , I never did really involve myself with the Good Shepherd group home `proposed for 19th & Shelton, since the residents of that area appeared to have little interest in the home, one way or the other. Upon receipt of your Administrative Report of June 4th, 1990 regarding the status of the church/state issues however, I went back to the file to see what impact this lack of resolution might have on that program. In looking through the file R-010-88, CU-010-88 covering the Good Shepherd home proposed for 19th & Shelton, I found the rezone ordinance, #4212, dated April 24th, 1989. The ordinance says in part . . . . . "and said zoning request having been granted with conditions, and the matter having been appealed to the City Council of the City of Renton, and said City Council having reversed Condition No. 4 to the Hearing Examiners in order to better understand the conditions and to determine what had been reversed, I went to the Hearing Examiners Report dated July 15, 1988. I found Condition No. 4 of the Hearing Examiners djeci -io[L relates to the Conditional Use Permit, and refers to "an automatic system of irrigation" . This is what the Council reversed. I found too, however, that there were three conditions to his necommendation for approval of the rezone. Each of these conditions required that the applicant execute specific restrictive covenants. Condition No; 3 requires "The execution of restrictive covenants which state that the failure to dMVslop according to the terms of the Conditional Use Permit pitbin one__ yeqr..2.. or to otherwise abandon the specific Conditiohal Use Permit or to discontinue this group home for any reason, ahj.11 S!�-'.!=_(5i2_thj -Zngf��L:tY t2_reylgrt-- qla .t. There is nothing in the ordinance to suggest that this requirement was waived or reversed, nor is there any provision made for an extension of the time limit. In fact, in the file are copies of the required Restrictive Covenants, dated April 11 , 1989 and sighed by Edward R. Stanley and Darlene R. Lang. This document was given the file number 8904260262. Item No. 3 is worded identically to the wording in the Hearing Examiners Report of July 15 as quoted above. To paraphrase, it says; " Good Shepherd of Washington a5'ees that the shall cause the property -_____---�- ` to revert to its prior R-1 zoning classification. " ` As I interpret this, if the property isn ' t developed by midnight April 23rd, or at least by April 24th 1990, the property reverts to an R-1 classification. It is now June 11th, 1990 and development of the property hasn ' t even been started. We are now seven weeks after the deadline and I have yet to see any notification by the City of a public hearing or any other City action required to cause the property to revert to the R-1 zoning. Has this fallen through the crack? to further confuse me, Mr. Ed Ball has a letter dated April 12th, 1990 in the file, the purpose of which was to schedule time to request an extension of the deadline. The request was later withdrawn but this letter specifically and accurately repeats the text of the three Restictive Covenants. The letter goes ~oh to state that Mr. Ball "believes that every obstacle to a September, 1990 ground breaking will soon be removed" . This would mean development would .' -- - --' ' . ' 4 months after Vne one year period had expz. ^d. Yet the Good `6nepkerd didn ' t request an extension, and the ordinance doesn ' t appear to provide for an extension anyway. Additionally, about this time it was being suggested tnat the church/state issues had been resolved Q the satisfaction » X f the ACLU and HUD However, in id M d in J x��h Administrative o e . o , m May an your June �^ Report it was disclosed that there were several outstanding issues, and I wonder if Mr. Ball 's September` 1990 ground breaking estimate might be a little optimistic. If this is the case, then it might very well be November, or even 1991 before ground breaking actually occurs. The Committee of The Whole issued a report dated May 7, 1910 to the effect that the Good Shepherd had withdrawn their application for an audience to hear, their request for a one year extension. The report goes on to say that "No extension was needed because all required building permits had been issued by the City on April 16, 1990, prior to the April 24, 1990 expiration date of the conditional use permit" . But the ordinance doesn ' t say the Egrmjj��� have t � be issued within one year ! It states that the within one year. Since the ordinance clearly deVines the conditions under which the rezone was undertaken, and since the results of non-compliance are clearly stated, and since the conditions have not been fulfilled, why does the City not initiate action to cause the zoning classification to revert as specified in the ordinance. Does the City have the authoriy to violate the terms of the enacted ordinance by allowing an extension to occur by default, that is, without the Council taking any formal action? I see this as a case of the City violating its own law. ' / -- - ' • CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. 4212 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF CERTAIN PROPERTIES WITHIN THE CITY OF RENTON FROM R-1 (Single-Family Residential) TO G-1 (General Use) (GOOD SHEPHERD OF WASHINGTON - R-010-88) . WHEREAS, under Chapter 7 , Title IV (Building Regulations ) of Ordinance No. 1628 known as the "Code of General. Ordinances of the City of Renton, " as amended, and the maps and reports adopted in conjunction therewith, the property hereinbelow described has heretofore been zoned as R-1 (Single-Family Residential ) ; and WHEREAS, a proper petition for change of zone classification of said property has been filed with the Community Development Department on or about February 24, 1988, which petition was duly referred. to the Hearing Examiner for investigation, study, and public hearing, and a Public Hearing having been held thereon on •or about June .29, 1988, and continued to July 5, 1988, and said matter having been duly considered by the Hearing Examiner, and said zoning request having been granted with conditions, and the matter having been appealed to the City Council of the City of Renton, and said City Council having reversed Condition No. 4 to the Hearing Examiner's Decision and said zoning request being in conformity with the City' s Comprehensive Plan, as amended, and the City Council having duly considered all matters relevant thereto, and all parties having been heard appearing in support thereof or in opposition thereto; 1 - ORDINANCE NO. 4212 NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS : , SECTION I : The following described property in the City of Renton is hereby rezoned to G-1 (General Use) as hereinbelow specified, subject to the condition established by the City Council at its October 3, 1988, meeting; and the Planning Manager is hereby authorized and directed to change the maps of the Zoning Ordinance, as amended, to evidence said rezoning, to-wit: See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof as if fully set forth herein. (Said property - approximately 0 . 85 acres - being located . on the south side of N.E. 19th Street at the 3900 block, between Union Avenue and Shelton Avenue_ N.E. ) SECTION II : This Ordinance shall be. effective upon its passage, approval, and five days after its publication. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this 24th day of April , 1989. , Maxine E. Motor, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this 24th day of April , 1989. ,N Ear Clymer, M r Approv as to form: Lawrence J. War en, City Attorney Date of Publication: April 28 , 1989 ORD. 65 : 10-10-88-as . 2 • Good Shepherd of Washington R-010-88 and CU-010-88 July 15, 1988 Page 7 to any home, for the occ.:sional party or special event. The four stalls appear to provide a good compromise between parking and asphalt. After all, the home is intended to provide a home-like setting not an institutional setting. 12. The home has been estimated to generate approximately 11 to 12 vehicle trips per day, just two (2) more trips than the typical single family home. Traffic obviously will not create any undue impacts on the neighborhood. 13. The single family home will be approximately 2,800 square feet in area. The home has been designed to resemble a rambler from the street. The one floor home will not block views, nor will it create shading or shadow effects on surrounding properties. The home is also designed to provide easy access for the developmentally disable residents and to provide easy maneuverability for staff in serving the residents. The home is not unlike others in the immediate neighborhood both as to scale and lot size. Actually, one of the primary differences will be that mandatory landscaping and landscaping upkeep will.be required, whereas for ordinary single family homes such matters are left to the discretion of the homeowner. 14. As specified above, the home will provide four parking spaces located to the east of the home but still 20 feet from the property line. Landscaped screening and a fence will provide separation between the parking area, driveway, and adjacent lot. Parking and associated impacts such as headlight glare and engine noise should not create any impacts on the adjacent property. 15. The plans do not reveal any potential problems with either pedestrian or vehicle circulation. Again, the proposed use is equivalent to a single family home in most particulars and impacts in this area such as circulation, should be minimal. 16. The home will be constructed with noise attenuation built in. The home will utilize thicker walls and completely insulated windows. The fencing and landscaping will help to contain noise, if any, on site and will also minimize any potential light or glare problems. 17. The various setbacks described will be landscaped with a variety of materials. The entire site, with the exception of the building pad and driveway/parking lot, will be planted with lawn grass. The entire perimeter of the site will contain larger plants including Black pine, Deodora cedar, Pin oak, Flowering cherry and Red maple trees. The applicant also proposes planting fruit trees on the site with a variety of bushes and scrubs gracing the site. The areas immediately adjacent to the home will also be landscaped. 18. The site is served by water and sewer lines. The applicant will provide off-site . improvements as required by the Building Code. The proposed development does not appear likely to burden the utility infrastructure. 19. In conclusion, the proposed group home for six developmentally disabled adults appears to be a use which will not adversely affect the general public health, safety or welfare nor does it appear to be a use which will adversely affect the residential amenities of the • immediate community. It will be staffed by professionals and operated by an organization which has been successful with similar homes elsewhere both in the State and along the west coast. Immediate neighbors, community residents and neighbors of similar homes expressed support for the home and suggested that such_a use did not, and would not impair their properties. Since the group home will not adversely affect the community, and there is a demonstrated need for such uses, the Conditional Use Permit will be approved, subject to approval of the Rezone by the City Council. RECOMMENDATION The City Council should approve the reclassification of the subject site from R-1 to G-1 subject to the following conditions: 1. The execution of restrictive covenants which require that the property shall be used for a group home for not more than six (6)- developmentally disabled adults. 2. The execution of restrictive covenants- which require-that in-all other respects the use limitations on the property shall be those of the R-l'-zoning code. _ - • (_ Good Shepherd of Washington R:010-88 and C.U-010-88 July 15, 1988 • Page 8 • 3. The execution of restrictive covenants which state that the failure to develop the property according to the terms of the Conditional Use Permit within one year, or to otherwise abandon the specific Conditional Use Permit or discontinue this group home for any reason, shall cause the property to revert to its prior R-1 zoning classification. DECISION The Conditional Use Permit is approved subject to the following conditions: 1. The City Council approve the rec'a sification of the subject site from R-1 to G-1. 2. The conditions imposed by the ERC are fully complied with by the applicant. 3. The group home shall be limited to a population of not more than six (6) developmentally disabled adults, 4. That all landscaping be subject to approval of the City's landscape architect, and that a fully automatic system of irrigation be installed to assure the continued survival of the landscaping. The applicant shall also be required to maintain the landscaping on a regular basis to assure it remains neat. Said landscaping shall be subject to approval by the City's landscape architect. 5. The applicant develop the home as represented on Exhibits 3, 4 and 5 with no substantial modifications, and that the structural details presented in the application be fully complied with regarding wall thickness, insulation and sound proofing, etc. • ORDERED THIS 15th day of July, 1988. .mot' . 1, FRED J. KAUFMAN HEARING EXAMINER TRANSMITTED THIS 15th day of July, 1988 to the parties of record: John Morris City of Renton Department of Housing and Community Development Ed Stanley 18940 Marine View Drive, S.W. Seattle, WA. 98166 Darlene Lang 4751 So. 172nd Place Seattle, WA. 98188 John Caruso, Architect 137_=1/2 Park Lane Kirkland, Washington _ Pat Holmes - _4621-South 164th S.E. --- Seattle, Washington 98188 Cathy Hawley 1717 Union Avenue N.E. Renton, WA. 98056 - - _ •Joann Hart 6511 So. 153rd Street • Seattle, WA. 98188 - Gene Lux - 10850 Dixon South Seattle, WA. 98178 • �� . R-010-88 O CITY OF RENTON • APR131989 00 0 RECEIVED N CITY CLERK'S OFFICE o N Cn Ni RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS RE: Re-zone R-010-88 N.E. 19th Street Group Home, Good Shepherd of Washington. 1 . Good Shepherd of Washington agrees that the property shall be used for a group home for not more than six developmentally disabled adults . 2. Good Shepherd of Washington agrees that in all other. ' respects the use limitations on the property shall be those of the R-1 zoning code . 3. Good Shepherd of Washington agrees that the failure to develop the property according to the terms of the Conditional Use Permit within one year, or to • otherwise abandon the specific Conditional Use Permit or discontinue this group home for any reason, shall cause. the property to revert to its prior R-1 zoning classification. Dated C X44' // , 1989 GOOD SHEPHERD OF .WASHINGTON a State of Washington orporation By Edward R. Stanle , Preside t By/ed2h4L6 Darlene R. Lng, Se etary FILED FOR RECORD AT REQUEST OF • OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK RENTON MUNICIPAL BLDG. _ • 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WA 95055 . Ir I ' April 12, 1990 • Renton City Council City of Renton 200 Mill Ave. S. Renton, WA 98055 • SUBJECT: Good Shepherd Group Homes This letter is to request that the Renton City Council place Good Shepherd of Washington on the Council meeting agenda for April 16, 1990. The purpose for this is to obtain Council approval nThe restrictive covenantion of the s of that property arnditional Use ea it for the property at 19th and Shelton Ave 1. Good Shepherd of Washington agrees that the property shall be used for a group home for not more than six developmentally disabled adults. 2. Good Shepherd of Washington agrees that in all other respects the use limitations on the property shall be those of the R-1 zoning code. 3. Good Shepherd of Washington agrees that the failure to develop the property according to the terms of the Conditional Use Permit within one year, or to otherwise abandon the specific Conditional Use Permit or discontinue this group home for any reason, shall cause the property to revert to its prior R-1 zoning classification. Although the progress of the Good Shepherd Homes has not met our expectations, we believe that every obstacle to a September, 1990 ground breaking will soon be removed. A letter signed by Rob Arbros of the Seattle HUD office which supports this belief, will be distributed under separate cover. S' ce ely, CITY OF RENTON (..- Edward L. Ball, President Good Shepherd of Washington ;� , 1990 13817 171 Ave. NE Redmond, WA 98052 RECEIVED CITY CLERK'S OFFICE • PC:__ _Ron-Drews GSW Board Members File -l2-AL.. - i/° �� -c� �7i�C c� ° 6'x- '-1-(6-9 0 3 -6/ • • • COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE COMMITTEE REPORT • MAY 7 , 1990 • GOOD SHEPHERD GROUP HOME (Committee of the Whole Meeting of April 23 , 1990) • The Committee of the Whole had been scheduled to hear a request f- representatives of the Good Shepherd of Washington for an extension of the deadline for the conditional use permit for the Group Home proposed for N.E. 19th Street at Shelton Avenue. No hearing was conducted, however, as Good Shepherd withdrew their request for an extension. No extension was needed because all required building permits had been issued by the City on April 16 , 1990, prior to the scheduled April 24 , 1990 expiration of the conditional use permit. . --f C 6-e Nancy Mathews Council President CITY OF RENTON City of Renton 3 199t} RECEIVED Community Development Department CITY CLERK'S OFFICE Memorandum Date: April 23, 1990 To: City Council From: 1 Kenneth E. Nyberg Director, Community Development Department Subject: J Good Shepherd Group Home, N.E. 19th at Shelton Avenue (010- 88) Contact: Donald K. Erickson, AICP (2550) Chief - Current Planning Lenora Blauman (2550) Project Manager This memorandum is written to confirm that the proponents for the Good Shepherd Group Home obtained necessary permits for the above-referenced project on April 20, 1990. Because the permits ha,'e been issued, the proponent has submitted to City Council, under separate cover, a letter rescinding the request for Council review of the project at this time. Thank you for your consideration. June 4, 1990 Renton City Council Minutes Page 172 ADMINISTRATIVE Referred 5/7/90 - Council inquiry regarding growth issues related to the 1% REPORT real estate excise tax. Memorandum from Sam Chastain, Park King County: 1% Real Superintendent, stated that the suburban cities would be eligible to compete Estate Excise Tax for funding in two of the three funding categories, Urban Acquisition and Stewardship and Maintenance. The Regional Acquisition would be solely controlled by the King County Open Space Committee for acquiring regional facilities or land. Local agencies would be allowed to submit acquisition and facilities proposals for consideration by this committee. He stated advantages of the proposed tax plan would be (1) opportunity to increase the presentation of Open Space on a regional and local basis; (2) provision of a funding source for specialized maintenance and rehabilitation of parks, trails, natural zones, etc; (3) inclusion of a sunset clause; and (4) exemption of the first $125,000 of the purchase price of a home. Disadvantages would be (1) fairness issue of imposition of a new tax on people who purchase real estate, especially should the exemption clause not be placed on the tax; (2) new or higher fees and taxes in the future; (3) possible adverse impact on any future bond issue by the City. Space Needs: City Hall Referred 5/14/90 - Inquiry from Mark Niemi, 23512 - 264th Avenue SE, Parking Maple Valley, regarding Renton Public Library parking. Letter from Mayor Clymer to Mr. Niemi stated that the problem is currently being studied by the City Parking Lot Committee. He noted that the designation of an additional 34 parking stalls for public use only in the Library parking lot should be adequate parking for Renton residents using the Library. Mr. Niemi was reminded that if he parks in alternate locations, he should be aware of the current posted parking limits and expected changes during the summer recreation.season. Rezone: Good Shepherd Referred 5/14/90 - Council inquiry regarding question of church/state issue Group Home (NE 19th with the Good Shepherd Group Home: Memorandum from Ken Nyberg, Street) R-010-88 '• ( _ Community Development Director, stated that the issue has not been resolved and the Housing and Human Services Citizens Advisory Committee has requested that the status of this project be discussed with Mr. Ed Ball, President of Good Shepherd Home, and other concerned board members as well as HUD, King County and Bellevue. Annexation: North Soos Referred 5/14/90 - Council inquiry regarding consultant selection panel for Creek (Fairwood) North Soos Creek project. Memorandum from Ken Nyberg, Director of Community Development, named the following as the consultant team for the public information program: Bernadene Dochnahl", Renton Advisory Committee; Meg Meier, North Soos Creek Citizens Advisory Board; Randy Berg, Parks Department; Rebecca Lind, Community Development Department; and Fred Fortine, Community Development Department. The selection panel for the North Renton Arterial Facilitation Project includes Lynn Guttmann, Gary Norris, and Mel Wilson from the Public Works Department. Public Works: NE 6th Referred 5/14/90 - Council inquiry regarding NE 6th Street as access to Street, Crown Point II apartment complex. Memorandum from Mayor Clymer via Lynn Guttmann, Public Works Director, stated that NE 6th Street only has a 30 foot right-of- way from 90 feet west of Queen Avenue NE to Union Avenue NE because the existing north 30 feet right-of-way was dedicated when the property was platted. Even though the 30 feet is unacceptable, it is all the City has at the present time until the south one-half is developed or platted, at which time the 'developers of Crown Point II will 'be required to dedicate an additional 30 feet. Executive Session MOVED BY MATHEWS, SECONDED BY ZIMMERMAN, COUNCIL CONVENE INTO EXECUTIVE SESSION TO DISCUSS LITIGATION ISSUES. CARRIED. Time 11:47 p.m. ADJOURNMENT Council reconvened into regular session; roll was called; all members were present. MOVED BY MATHEWS, SECONDED BY NELSON, COUNCIL ADJOURN THE MEETING. CARRIED. Time 12:36 a.m. (-07) , MARILYN T. P RSEN, CMC, City Clerk Recorder: Sandra Wales 06/04/90 CITY OF RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM • DATE: May 18, 1990 4 / y �T0: May C1yLrfr/ ;; V /d7/- • FROM: z•• O Director' SUBJECT: ;Response to•Council Inquiry Staff Contact: John Morris, Coordinator Housing & Human Services Division (2553) Question from Mr. Stredicke, "Has.the City been assured that the issue of separation of church and state regarding Good Shepherd Group Home funding been resolved?" The answer is no. A letter (see attached copy) has been delivered to Mr. Ed Ball which seeks answers regarding not only the religious issues, but several other issues as well. Copies of the letter have also been sent to HUD, King County, and Bellevue because they have similar concerns to ours. 1 am expecting a response to the letter by the end of the month. Regardless of the response, the Housing and Human Services Citizens Advisory Committee has requested the opportunity to discuss the status of the projects with Mr. Ed Ball and other Good Shepherd of Washington board members. After that meeting, the Citizens Advisory Committee will either reaffirm their support of the projects, request more information or recommend withdrawal of support for the projects. If you have any further questions you may contact John Morris at 235-2553. !> © CITY OF R F+;N�`ON ` .611. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Housing and Human Resources John Morris,'Coordinator May 1, 1990 . Ed Ball, President Good.Shepherd of Washington 13817 171st Ave. NE Redmond, WA 98052 Dear Ed, . to the two As we have discussed, the City of Renton has questions the process of developing pRenton home projects These your organization has been, and continues tQ ,, recent changes in your .questions are primarily programmatic in nature and are 'necessitated by leadership, and by the length of time that has transpired since you were allocated project , development funds. . sues that they I am suggesting the following process to addne�rit writing in the sthisletterd. rAlllof your any sanswers should raise. All significant questions will be putponses and ask for likewise be in writing, in a letter addressed-towill bepreparedlforvuse by the Ho sing and Human clarifications as needed. A staff report Resources.Citizens Advisory Committee. The Committee oumr response tor my letter will be an excellen� discuss the group home projects with you, Y opportunity for that discussion to occur. Issue: Religion• Has your Board acted in an official capacity in agreeing to the following provisions? F . In addition to, and not in substitution for, other provisions of this Agreement regarding the provision of management services for Good Shepherd Home, the management agent: 17 nal 1. represents that it is, or may be deemed eus pu pones hichti� supersvised or or organization, or an organization operated td for religio controlled.by or in connection with a religious or denominational institution or organization; 2. agrees on behalf of itself, its employees, agents and subcontractors, that, in connection with such management services: • a. it Will not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment on the basis of religion and will not limit employment or give preference in employment to persons on the basis of religion. b, it will not discriminate against any person applying for residency on the basis of religion. and will not'limit such residency or•give preference to persons on the basis of religion; 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2553 F, cslaillq (206) 235-2513 . Ed Ball May 1, 1990 Page 2 conduct no c. it will provide no religious instruction or counselling, and,enorr religiousother worship or services, engage in.:no;religious;.proselytizing,. religious influence in the`.provision..ofsuch;.inanagement services;.and. ' eernerit d• the facilities managed in.whole or.in part under••th • f grr those sy bolscor tain no sectarian or religious symbols-or decorations; excep tdecorations posted by each resident in his or her immediate living area. If the Board has officially acted on these provisions, can you provide the City with a certified copy of the Board minutes documenting that ac Based on the keynote address at the Annual.Meeting.of Good Shepherd Lutheran Home of the West held March 17, 1990, contained in Good o oShepherd. e pplain how tBh1esBoardlon wa gable lays tosignificant reconcile its role in Good Shepherd Group Homes. Cany religious role with HUD and Block Grant requirements that severely reduce that role. Issue: Revisions of By-Laws Does Good Shepherd Lutheran Home of the West want to change the existing By-Laws of Good Shepherd of Washington? , could you please highlight the changes and provide..a brief explanation of why the If yes, change is proposed, and what you anticipate:its::effects will be?, Your application indicates that "The Board is composed of. Jg .12_e_ 21t; who with the help of • - the sponsor, Good Shepherd Lutheran Hfrom e our the ct vex. aPleasere dindi ateing ehow this element will lopment." Local representation on the Board is vital perspe continue to be incorporated into your organization. Issue: Service to Renton Residents Your original application for Block Grants funds stated in response to the question: "Does the proposed project target Renton as its primary service area?" that "Case management, Department of Developmental Disabilities makes all referrals to the provider, in this caWeGood will ` Shepherd. Although we don' a to absolute lCo nRentonol of `resodents w is pled belgi° the ven priority." do every thing within our power Is this still an accurate statement of your intentions? 'Explain. Issue: Day to Day Management of the Facility In respo nse to the question: . Indicate who.on your staff will:be'resp ensibl home thisis bpi of he and' list their qualification. You provided the following statement. n ,• , Habilitation Coord}nator will be in charge. :Thhtp mi mama ff twolyearsrrelevanttexpe en ce in a field related to�;tfle position requirements wit . MR/DD field, or a Bachelor's Degree in the .fiein ld dfi toel the position requirements with a minimum of four years relevant experience Is this still an accurate statement of your intentions?' Explain. • • •• • Ed Ball • May 1, 1990. Page 3 Issue: Client Profile • • Staff, Council, and citizens were repeatedly told these homes would be for the severely developmentally disabled. ,• Is this still the case? Explain, if necessary, and include your working definition of the severely developmentally disabled.. If I can be of any help in working with you on your responses to these questions, please give me a call. ••• • . - Sincerely, ohn Morris • • • John/goodshep • .f 1 %• . CITY OF RENTON "AL 'k� ,t.. LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER Earl Clymer, Mayor Fred J. Kaufman July 26, 1988 Ed Stanley, President Good Shepherd.of Washington 18940 Marine View Drive S.W. Seattle, Washington 98166 • Re: Request for Reconsideration File R-010-88 and CU-010-88 Dear Mr. Stanley: I have reviewed your request for reconsideration in the above entitled matter and my response follows. While I understand your concerns regarding the irrigation system, you must understand that the City must assure that the subject site will be maintained and that the landscaping efforts intended to integrate the home into the community succeed. The landscaping was not only intended as an aesthetic requirement but was primarily intended to screen and buffer the surrounding single family homes from what could be an intrusive use. While the decision found the home would be acceptable, it was viewed as such with a full complement of landscaping materials which would be maintained on the site. If you have any additional concerns you may again contact this office. If you are not satisfied with the decision you may appeal the decision to the City Council within fourteen (14) days of this decision by filing the appropriate fee of $75.00 with the City Clerk. Sincerely, 6j—jr— FRED J. KA FMAN HEARING EXAMINER cc: All Parties of Record All Parties of Staff 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2593 GOOD SHEPHERD OF WASHINGTON RECEIVE"I V�' '.� 18940 MARINE VIEW DR., SW /8, , SEATTLE, WA 98166 Phone 243-2895 • JUL` 19$�.; ,. • Ju8t#�QENT' ARING EXAMINE©N • City of Renton Office of Hearing Examiner . . . . Fred Kaufman, Hearing Examiner . '" . , 200 Mill Street - Renton, WA 98055 . RE: Report and Recommendation of July 15, 1988, Good Shepherd of Washington, File No: R-010-88 . and 'CU-010-88. " , Dear Mr. Kaufman: . . The Report and Recommendation of July- 15, . 1988, on the property in the 3900 block of 19th Street is an excellent report in. that it covers the facts in great detail and identifies all, the areas of concern. We are in agreement with the report and recommendations , however, we take exception with the Conditional Use Permit, condi- • tion #4, that requires the installation of .a fully., automatic irti=.' gation system. We request your reconsideration. of' this item. The landscaping plan as currently shown includes more'.grass. and trees then we initially proposed and upon 'City insistence we' agreed to the plan as shown. Our testimony included the fact' that •we are . ' committed to maintenance of the site, but did not -include- the fol- lowing information related to the ,landscaping which we. offer for your consideration: . . ' 1 . In an effort to stay within our budget and maintain the most economical maintenance costs , we have .selected. species of trees which grow well' in the Pacific Northwest without being dependent on artificial irrigation. Cedrus . Deodora for' example, is frequently planted along freeway where it grows profusely. The Austrian Black Pine, Red Maple and Fruit Trees also grow extremely well in this . area with' the 'rainfall which is common to this area. . We would consider :substituting other trees , if other trees would be more suitable. : There- fore, an irrigation system is not necessary for this purpose. 2. The holding area, which we are providing for surface water management, will provide water for much Of the lawn in the . rear of the home. Adding an irrigation system in-this area is not necessary and it would not serve a useful purpose, but be a costly expense. ' 3. The irrigation system is a costly requirement which was not ' planned for in our budget. The estimated, cost .to install is approximately $8, 000 plus engineering costs of approximately $2, 000 for a total cost of $10 , 000 . In addition, the .system requires an annual service maintenance, at the cost of $150 ,' " : to flush the system' out to prevent freezing during the winter months . Our budget is limited. The HUD and Block Grant dol- • lars which are funding the development of this, project will ' not cover this item. The HUD 202 Loan Program, - Housing for ' • - 2 - 3. (Continued) .�.` „ • the Low Income Elderly and the Handicapped, will: not fund the ' water irrigation system, because by any standard. thisis a luxury item and is only included in the most expensive hous- , ing. The system will be used about . one or two months a year: and that is not a very efficient use of capital dollars . . Under the HUD 202 program these kind of items can. only be added with a large cash :payment at loan closing that covers , installation of the system and includes the maintenance costs for the entire 40 year loan period. This cash payment will equal approximately twice the cost of the irrigation system ($20 ,00'0) . • . 4. This home is designed in •every' way to be •as close ;to a family home as possible. We wish to convey the image ofra single family residence much like any other home in the neighbor- • hood. The home will be the permanent. home' for ,our residents . The residents may be mentally retarded; however,' with staff support would enjoy watering the scrubs , trees and grass and the situation could be used as a learning experience. With the limited dollars available to .us we believe our priority must be to spend these dollars on direct support of people. The facilities should include all the necessities of life, but beyond that we risk loosing public confidence if we spend donated dollars. , on amenities that the general public can not 'afford in.—their own • homes. The Good Shepherd organization depends on the. general pub- lic support in the form of donations to supplement the: programs . . Generally, the dollars provided by state funding are. not adequate to do the job. A recent study by King County showed that. all the . operators of group homes in King County are spending _more ,money for ' operating the group homes •than the state provides . . • It is with this perspective that we wish you would review the need ;..' for the irrigation system and rule that this home can be.:properly ' maintained without it. Sincerely, ' • , • 2:1 0 / f • .' Ed Stanley / - . President - . ' cc: Earl Clymer, Mayor . Don Erickson, Zoning Administrator , ' Glen Gordon, Fire Marshall ' Lawrence J Warren, City Attorney _ . . . . . . Gary Norris , Traffic Engineer . Richard M. Stredicke, 'Councilman . Larry M. Springer , Policy•.Development Director Ronald Nelson, Building & , Zoning Director John Adamson, Development Program Director . John Morris , Depart. of Housing and Community Development 115 GOOD SHEPHERD OF WASHINGTON ., 18940 MARINE VIEW DR. SW SEATTLE, WA 981668r � Phone 243-2895 JUL'1�198$ Ju l r ENTON ARING EXAMINER City of Renton Office of Hearing Examiner Fred Kaufman, Hearing Examiner 200 Mill Street Renton, WA 98055 RE: Report and Recommendation of July 15, 1988, Good Shepherd of Washington, File No: R-010-88 and CU-010-88 . Dear Mr. Kaufman: The Report and Recommendation of July 15, 1988 , on the property in the 3900 block of 19th Street is an excellent report in that it covers the facts in great detail and identifies all the areas of concern. We are in agreement with the report and recommendations , however , we take exception with the Conditional Use Permit , condi- tion #4, that requires the installation of a fully automatic irri- gation system. We request your reconsideration of this item. The landscaping plan as currently shown includes more grass and trees then we initially proposed and upon City insistence we agreed to the plan as shown. Our testimony included the fact that we are committed to maintenance of the site, but did not include the fol- lowing information related to the landscaping which we offer for your consideration: 1 . In an effort to stay within our budget and maintain the most economical maintenance costs , we have selected species of trees which grow well in the Pacific Northwest without being dependent on artificial irrigation. Cedrus Deodora for example, is frequently planted along freeway where it grows profusely. The Austrian Black Pine, Red Maple and Fruit Trees also grow extremely well in this area with the rainfall which is common to this area. We would consider substituting other trees , if other trees would be more suitable. There- fore, an irrigation system is not necessary for this purpose. 2. The holding area, which we are providing for surface water management, will provide water for much of the lawn in the rear of the home. Adding an irrigation system in this area is not necessary and it would not serve a useful purpose, but be a costly expense. 3. The irrigation system is a costly requirement which was not planned for in our budget. The estimated cost to install is approximately $8, 000 plus engineering costs of approximately $2 , 000 for a total cost of $10 , 000 . In addition, the system requires an annual service maintenance, at the cost of $150 , to flush the system out to prevent freezing during the winter months . Our budget is limited . The HUD and Block Grant dol- lars which are funding the development of this project will not cover this item. The HUD 202 Loan Program, Housing for � r - 2 - 2 . (Continued) the Low Income Elderly and the Handicapped, will not fund the water irrigation system, because by any standard this is a luxury item and is only included in the most expensive hous- ing. The system will be used about one or two months a year and that is not a very efficient use of capital dollars. Under the HUD 202 program these kind of items can only be added with a large cash payment at loan closing that covers installation of the system and includes the maintenance costs for the entire 40 year loan period. This cash payment will equal approximately twice the cost of the irrigation system ($20 , 000) . 4. This home is designed in every way to be as close to a family home as possible. We wish to convey the image of a single family residence much like any other home in the neighbor- hood . The home will be the permanent home for our residents . The residents may be mentally retarded; however, with staff support would enjoy watering the scrubs , trees and grass and the situation could be used as a learning experience. With the limited dollars available to us we believe our priority must be to spend these dollars on direct support of people. The facilities should include all the necessities of life, but beyond that we risk loosing public confidence if we spend donated dollars on amenities that the general public can not afford in their own homes. The Good Shepherd organization depends on the general pub- lic support in the form of donations to supplement the programs . Generally, the dollars provided by state funding are not adequate to do the job. A recent study by King County showed that all the operators of group homes in King County are spending more money for operating the group homes than the state provides . It is with this perspective that we wish you would review the need for the irrigation system and rule that this home can be properly maintained without it. Sincerely, Lti / Ed Stanley / President cc: Earl Clymer, Mayor Don Erickson, Zoning Administrator Glen Gordon, Fire Marshall Lawrence J Warren, City Attorney Gary Norris , Traffic Engineer Richard M. Stredicke, Councilman Larry M. Springer, Policy Development Director Ronald Nelson, Building & Zoning Director John Adamson, Development Program Director John Morris , Depart. of Housing and Community Development AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING STATE OF WASHINGTON ) )ss. County of King ) DOTTY KLINGMAN , being first duly sworn, upon oath, deposes and states: That on the 15th day of July , 1988 affiant deposited in the mails of the United States a sealed envelope containing a decision or recommendation with postage prepaid, addressed to the parties of record in the below entitled application or petition. /al-, tli •SUBSC,F3jpgQ. AND SWORN to before me this 1 s day ef' EDC — . of �� o� ....�Rr 1988 00:4* ;0q. Y :z� §uJi;� ; ) �. :gi • AUG •. 5 1 •jk Notary Public in and for the State of. Washington, ---"ATE T .••'O' ,," residing at ` _ p� 7,—r�, • , therein. Application, Petition, or Case 'I: GOOD SHEPHERD OF WASHINGTON - R-010-88 & CU-010-88 (The minutes contain a list of the parties of record.) July 15, 1988 OFFICE OF THE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION APPLICANT: GOOD SHEPHERD OF WASHINGTON File No: R-010-88 and CU-010-88 LOCATION: 3900 block of N.E. 19th Street. Located on the south side of N.E. 19th Street, east of Shelton Avenue N.E. and west of Union Avenue N.E. SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Rezone of property from R-1 to G-1 to develop the site with a group home for six developmentally disabled adults through a Conditional Use Permit. SUMMARY OF ACTION: Building and Zoning Department Recommendation: Approval with conditions. BUILDING & ZONING The Building & Zoning Department Report was DEPARTMENT REPORT: received by the Examiner on June 28, 1988 PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Building and Zoning Department Report, examining available information on file with the application, and field checking the property and surrounding area, the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: MINUTES The hearing was opened on July 5, 1988 at 9:30 A.M. in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. The following exhibits were entered into the record: Exhibit #1 - Yellow File containing application, proof of posting and publication and other documentation pertinent to this request. Exhibit #2 - Vicinity Map Exhibit #3 - Site Plan Exhibit #4 - Landscape Plan Exhibit #5 - Elevation Plan Exhibit #6 - Letters of Support for Good Shepherd Home in Issaquah. Exhibit #7 - Letters of Support for Good Shepherd Home proposed for 19th and Union. Exhibit #8 - Three (3) pictures showing architecture and design of other Good Shepherd Homes in various locations. The hearing opened with a presentation of the staff report by Lenora Blauman, Assistant Planner. In her review she stated the site is a .847 acre vacant site the applicant wishes to rezone from R-1 to G-1; the ERC review prompted conditions to be placed on the property as to design review, landscape plans, approval of hours of operation and a bond to ensure the city roadways will be kept clean during construction. In 1982 the zoning map was revised and the present R-1 designation was applied to the property; the subject site is part of the Northeast Renton Area Plan and there is no proof that this parcel was considered,for reclassification at that time. The zoning permitted under the Comprehensive Plan for this property is for single family residential development which would include R-1 as well as G-1; the group home being proposed would be acceptable under the G-1 development standards, and staff is recommending Good Shepherd of Washington R-010-88 and CU-010-88 July 15, 1988 Page 2 if the rezoning is granted that a Restrictive Covenant be placed on the property to limit uses permitted on the site to a group home. If the home is not developed then the property will revert to the R-1 zoning. The Examiner questioned if the location of the home could be moved on the property in case this proposal should dissolve, then the lot could be legally divided into possibly 3 single family lots. Staff agreed to check into this matter. Ms. Blauman continued reviewing the public utilities to the site and noted no impact is expected from this development; she reviewed the request for a Conditional Use Permit. After evaluating the criteria for this request it was noted this is a single family styled home for 6 developmentally disabled adults between the ages of 21 and 40, with no major medical problems, who are not mentally ill and have no criminal background; proposed development is consistent with residential policies and will be designed to be compatible with the residential character of the neighborhood; the home and surrounding amenities will enhance the property and local community; and this is the first home of this type to be located within the City. Blauman stated it is felt there is a need for this type of home in the community as it has been determined there are more than 500 persons within the city in need of this type of housing; the home will be approximately 2528 sq. ft.; fencing and landscaping will be provided; there will be outdoor parking for 4 vehicles with provisions for a van to be used to transport the occupants to work and recreation, with no residents of the home driving. It is estimated there will be 12 vehicle trips daily; there will be no excess noise from the site with measures such as fencing entirely around the property 4 ft - 6 ft. high and extra landscaping to be used to buffer any noise or extra light or glare from the site. Planner Blauman requested approval of this Conditional Use Permit and Rezone request subject to the conditions set out by staff in their report to the Examiner. Support from City staff was received from John Morris of the Housing and Community Development Department who set out how the money is allocated from H&CD through the Block Grant Program and how it relates to this proposal. He pointed out as a part of this process there is a Citizens Advisory Committee which has been active since the early 1970's; reviewed the procedure from submittal of an application to it's review and subsequent hearing stage. Mr. Morris reviewed some of the issues considered by his department before recommending an application of this nature such as whether or not the project is consistent with locally adopted plans and standards which include compliance with the City's Comprehensive Plan, H&CD Policies and County policies that may be relevant, as well as the opportunity for all residents to obtain sound housing. Letters of support from residents in close proximity to the proposed home were offered into the record. Morris reviewed the King County policies to be considered for this type of project and noted there is a documented need for this type of housing, feels this project will provide for these needs with low cost housing in a home-like setting; the Block Grant money is earmarked just for Renton and it is felt the citizens will be served with this proposal as they will be given priority, and this project addresses a significant health and safety issue for low income people. There will be 24-hour care in a home-like environment; and it was pointed out that this proposal is a strong partnership between governmental and private agencies with the availability and commitment of matching funds now documented. In closing Mr. Morris stated the agencies involved all believe Good Shepherd is reliable and capable of seeing this project through to its end. He asked the Examiner's approval of this request as presented. Testifying in support of the proposal on behalf of the applicant was Ed Stanley, 18940 Marine View Drive S.W., Seattle, 98166. Mr. Stanley thanked staff for their support of the project; noted the residents will be in day programs and will be gone from the home from approximately 9:00 A.M. to 3:00 P.M., Monday through Friday. They will have no behavior problems; will be involved in 3 programs provided by King County (according to their capabilities); there will be paid professional staff trained in many levels of care; there will be approximately 8-1/4 persons at this home with the 1/4 person being the individual responsible for the 4 homes that will be located throughout King County. Stanley reviewed the programs and numbers that will be involved in all of the proposed King County Good Shepherd Homes. He said there will be 2 staff members in the home during the day, one at night, and 3 during shift changes. In closing Mr. Stanley noted Good Shepherd has been providing these types of services for over 30 years, serving over 700 developmentally disabled persons, and stated Good Shepherd looks forward to their project in Renton and assured the Examiner they will make every effort to be the very best of neighbors and friends. Responding in support of this proposal was Darlene Lang, 4751 So. 172nd Place, Seattle, 98188, Corporate Secretary for Good Shepherd of Washington. She advised the Examiner this is a non- profit organization; stated this site was selected due to the availability of sewers, the home is readily accessible to shopping, medical services and medical care as well as recreational facilities, transportation; the home must be located in a residential community with a level lot that will accommodate a rambler-type home. She stated they will be good neighbors and presented Exhibits 6 and 7 showing support for their organization located in Issaquah and the proposed 19th and Union home. Good Shepherd of Washington R-010-88 and CU-010-88 July 15, 1988 Page 3 Support was also shown by John Caruso, architect, 137-1/2 Park Lane, Kirkland, Washington who stated the applicant will meet all mitigated requirements by the ERC, does not feel there is a need for additional parking noting the other homes in the neighborhood are not required to have 4 or more parking spaces; noise levels will be minimized with the use of special wall construction inside this home as well as the fact it is not felt there will be any more noise from the occupants of this home than would be found in a average household. Mr. Caruso did not feel the suggestion to possibly relocate the building on the lot was a good idea. He said there is no way this project could be defunct and anyone could buy the house as a single family home as it is specially constructed for this particular use. Mr. Caruso presented photos showing the Issaquah and Bellevue Group Homes and the way these homes have been designed, landscaped and generally maintained to show they are aesthetically agreeable with the surrounding neighborhood. Pat Holmes, 4621 South 164th Street, Seattle, 98188 supported this proposal stating she is a neighbor of the home in the McMicken Heights area and feels Good Shepherd Home has been a good neighbor and created no problems for the neighborhood. Cathy Hawley of 1717 Union Avenue N.E. Renton 98056 supported the proposal stating she is a neighbor directly to the south of this property. She has a family member who is developmentally handicapped and supports the need for this type of home; her experience with the handicapped has always been very positive and she is looking forward to having Good Shepherd as a neighbor. Joann Hart 6511 So. 153rd Street, Seattle 98188 spoke in support stating she is a parent and guardian of a handicapped daughter. She stated she understands the need for this type of home and the support and family-like atmosphere they provide. She relayed her experience with not only her daughter but others with the same disability and feels if neighbors take the time to get to know the patrons of these types of facilities, as well as staff, they will find it to be a very rewarding experience as well as helping to alleviate some of their fears about the handicapped and their living habits. She would welcome Good Shepherd to her neighborhood. Closing support testimony was received from Gene Lux, 10850 Dixon Drive South, Seattle, 98178. Mr. Lux was in the Legislature when legislation was passed for the operational funding for this type of facility. This Bill went through numerous hearings and it was obvious by the legislative vote that this is the most cost effect and humane way to deal with this problem. He said as a builder he has had many experiences with various kinds of home buyers including those with children who were not disciplined and caused great damage to personal property as well as the surrounding neighborhood, noting those circumstances will not occur with this facility. Mr. Lux stated he feels the people who are apprehensive about this type of facility will be very pleased with the environment the home will bring to the neighborhood. It will be established and have a staff person on duty 24 hours a day. He expressed his support for this project. The Examiner called for further testimony regarding this project. There was no one else wishing to speak, and no further comments from staff. The hearing closed at 11:00 A.M. FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & DECISION: Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: 1. The applicant, Good Shepherd of Washington, filed a request for approval of a rezone of approximately .847 acres of property from R-1 (Single Family; Lot size - 7,200 sq ft) to G- 1 (Single Family; Minimum Lot Size - 35,000 sq ft) together with a Conditional Use Permit to establish a group home for developmentally disabled adults. 2. The yellow file containing the staff report, the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) documentation and other pertinent materials was entered into the record as Exhibit #1. 3. The Environmental Review Committee (ERC), the City's responsible official issued a Declaration of Non-Significance - Mitigated (DNS-M) for the subject proposal. 4. The subject proposal was reviewed by all departments with an interest in the matter. 5. There was no opposition from the public regarding the subject site. 6. The subject site is located on the south side of the 3900 block of N.E. 19th Street, between Union Avenue N.E. on the east and Shelton Avenue N.E. on the west. Good Shepherd of Washington R-010-88 and CU-010-88 July 15, 1988 Page 4 7. The City Council annexed the subject site to the city with the adoption of Ordinance 2472, enacted in March, 1969. The site was reclassified to its current R-1 zoning with a consolidation of residential zoning districts enacted by the City Council in June, 1982 (Ordinance 3634). 8. A lot line adjustment was approved in May, 1984 and a short plat was approved in August, 1985. A request that the off-site improvements be waived was denied when the short plat was approved. 9. The map element of the Comprehensive Plan designates the area in which the subject site is located as suitable for the development of single family uses, but does not mandate such development without consideration of other policies of the plan. 10. The subject site is a relatively level, vacant parcel. The area around it is developed primarily with single family homes. The lots in the area vary in size from the more standard 7,200 square foot to larger lots, similar in size to the subject site's 36,895 square feet. The site is covered with heavy vegetation, although most of it is weed species. 11. Water and sewer lines and a storm culvert are located along N.E. 19th Street in front of the subject site. 12. Metro Transit runs bus lines along Union Avenue just east of the site. 13. A small shopping center is located just southeast of the site at Union and N.E. Sunset Boulevard. Additional shopping opportunities are located east and west of the site along Sunset. 14. The applicant proposes reclassifying the subject site from its current zoning of R-1 to G-1 in order to facilitate the construction and establishment of a group home on the site. The current zoning does not permit group homes whereas the proposed zoning, the G-1, permits the establishment of group homes by Conditional Use Permit. 15. The home would serve six (6) developmentally disabled adults as a full-time residence. The disabilities would vary and some could be wheelchair bound. At the time of admission, residents can vary in age from 21 to 40 years old. There is no maximum age limit for residents. None of the residents would be mentally ill or have criminal backgrounds. 16. The intent would be to integrate these people into the community where they can work, shop, play and simply reside in an ordinary, or close to ordinary, residential environment. 17. Based upon these objectives and standards required by a variety of funding sources, including federal, state, local grant funds and private sources, the applicant chose the site. The site serves some prime objectives. It is in the midst of a single family neighborhood with public transit located down the block. It is just north of a small shopping center with additional shopping close by. In addition, HUD, one of the fund sources, requires such homes to be served by sewers. Renton provides sewers in this area. 18. The home will be a single family home one story or approximately 16 feet in height. The maximum height permitted in the zone is 35 feet. The home will be 2,528 square feet. The home will be set back 30 feet from the street. There will be a setback of approximately 70 feet from the east property line, approximately 105 feet from the west property line and a rear yard setback of approximately 70 feet. 19. The home will be served by four (4) parking stalls along the east side of the home. The driveway serving the parking area will be seventeen and a half (17.5) feet from the eastern property line. This area will be screened by larger trees and other ornamental landscaping, and it will be fenced. The property will be fenced on all sides. A four foot high fence will be provided along the front property line, with six foot fences located along the remaining perimeter of the site. The required side yards are five feet. The minimum required front yard is 20 feet, while the minimum rear yard is 30 feet. 20. While lot coverage in the G-1 zone is permitted to be fifteen percent (15%), the home will cover not more than seven (7%) of the site. For comparison purposes staff also calculated that the home would be well below the fifty (50%) lot coverage of the existing R-1 zone, even if the home were situated on a 7,200 square foot lot. Good Shepherd of Washington - R-010-88 and CU-010-88 July 15, 1988 Page 5 21. The estimated traffic which the proposed use will generate is approximately 12 trips per day distributed over staff arrivals, visitors, outings, and service providers. A single family home usually generates approximately 10 trips per day. Residents will not drive. Staff anticipates that the four parking stalls proposed will provide sufficient parking for the needs of the home without unnecessarily converting areas which would otherwise be landscaping to asphalt parking stalls. 22. The home will be staffed by a professional staff of four and will be staffed 24 hours per day. There will be an average of two staff members on duty during the day; one member during the sleeping hours; and one during shift changes. The anticipated population would equal approximately 6.25 adults. 23. The staff will provide certain skills to assist in integrating the residents into the community. Staff will provide among other functions, a living skills instructor, a resident training instructor, staff supervisor, and rehabilitation coordinator. 24. The applicant, Good Shepherd of Washington and its associated organization has operated for over 30 years, providing similar services to approximately 700 people in 40 facilities. 25. The residents will be employed in a variety of programs in the surrounding community. Workshops, sheltered work shops and other opportunities and services are located at RVTI, and also in the cities of Issaquah, Kent, and Factoria. Medical services, if necessary, are found at Valley Medical Center and Overlake Hospital. 26. A number of persons other than the applicant and city staff testified to the need for such facilities. An immediate neighbor testified in support of the proposal, as did others members of the community. A neighbor of an existing group home testified that the home was not intrusive and was not unlike other residences in that neighborhood, and presented no particular problems. CONCLUSIONS Rezone 1. The proponent of a rezone must demonstrate that the request is in the public interest, that it will not impair the public health, safety and welfare and in addition, complies with at least one of the criteria found in Section 4-3010, which provides in part that: a. The subject site has not been considered in a previous area-wide rezone or land use analysis; or b. The subject site is potentially designated for the new classification per the Comprehensive Plan; or c. There has been a material and substantial change in the area in which the subject site is located since the last rezoning of the property or area. The requested classification is justified and should be approved by the City Council. 2. While the request is somewhat unusual it is not inappropriate. Normally requests are to modify the zoning to allow a more intensive use of property. For example, applicants usually petition to reclassify property from G-1 to R-1 to allow approximately 4 homes on approximately 35,000 square feet. Here, we have an applicant petitioning to lessen the activity permitted on a site. Four single family homes on the site would generate a population of approximately 10 persons and generate approximately 40 daily vehicle trips. The proposal would result in a population of from 6 to 10 people with traffic of approximately 12 trips per day. In addition, less of the lot would be dedicated to structures, parking and driveways. 3. The site has not been considered for reclassification since annexation. The 1982 change was merely a consolidation of zoning districts with no particular parcel by parcel analysis. That consolidation and the proposed change both support the objective of the Comprehensive Plan which designates the area in which the site is located for single family uses. G-1 zoning is a suitable district for single family development compatible with the Comprehensive Plan. 4. Since the applicant's ultimate objective, the establishment of a group home for developmentally disabled adults, is not incompatible with the Comprehensive Plan, the request is timely. The home may only be permitted on property zoned G-1 and review at Good Shepherd of Washington R-010-88 and CU-010-88 July 15, 1988 Page 6 this time is appropriate. The facts and circumstances which demonstrate an absence of such facilities in the City of Renton provide justification for studying this issue. 5. Since the request is not incompatible with the area, may result in less dense development, less impermeable surface and less traffic, the City Council should approve the reclassification as requested. Conditional Use Permit 6. The applicant for a Conditional Use Permit must demonstrate that the use is in the public interest, will not impair the health, safety or welfare of the general public and is in compliance with the criteria found in Section 4-748(C) which provides in part that: a. The proposal generally conforms with the Comprehensive Plan; b. There is a general community need for the proposed use at the proposed location; c. There will be no undue impacts on adjacent property; d. The proposed use is compatible in scale with the adjacent residential uses, if any; e. Parking, unless otherwise permitted, will not occur in the required yards; f. Traffic and pedestrian circulation will be safe and adequate for the proposed project; g. Noise, light and glare will not cause an adverse affect on neighboring property; h. Landscaping shall be sufficient to buffer the use from rights-of-way and neighboring property where appropriate; and i. Adequate public services are available to serve the proposal. The requested conditional use appears justified. 7. The use is a modified form of a residential use which is compatible with the Comprehensive Plan. The use will be entirely contained within a structure which gives all external appearances of being an ordinary single family home. The size, approximately 2,800 square feet, is not atypical, especially when located on a larger single family lot. 8. The applicant and the Housing and Community Development division of the City both indicated that there are few similar facilities in the area, and none currently within the City limits. The overall need greatly outstrips the supply of residential facilities for the developmentally disabled adult population, and this home for six members of that population would meet only a small fraction of the need. It has been mandated by courts and suggested by doctors that these persons not be institutionalized. Rather, it has been suggested their care be provided in ordinary community settings. 9. The second component of community need is whether the subject site or proposed location is appropriate. The applicant sought a larger lot to accommodate the group home which would also be near services such as shopping, transit lines, sewers, and employment and medical services. The site chosen appears appropriate from that stand point. A larger home will not be out of character with the surrounding homes nor will the larger home overpower the lot. 10. While the applicant does not expect the residents to create any untoward impacts on the community, the population is equivalent to a slightly larger than usual family unit. Larger families can have more impact than a typical family of four. Therefore, the applicant has selected the larger lot. Similarly, City Code recognizes the potential affects of such uses and requires group homes to be located on these larger lots in the G-1 district. Again, while not particularly discriminating against larger family units, it is a recognized fact that larger families generally have greater impacts. The site selected appears suitable for the group home, especially in light of the additional landscaping and setbacks which will be provided. 11. The home, as proposed, does not appear to have any potential to create any undue impacts on surrounding homes. The site will be well landscaped and fenced. Parking for four cars should minimize any off-site impacts, although on-street parking is available, as it is May T. 1996 mton City Council Minutes Page 135 OLD BUSINESS Council President Mathews presented Committee of the Whole report stating Committee of the Whole that on 4/23/90 the Committee had been scheduled to hear a request from Appeal: Good Shepherd representatives of the Good Shepherd of Washington for an extension of the Group Home Rezone (NE deadline for the conditional use permit for the Group Home proposed for NE 19th Street) R 010-88 19th Street at Shelton Avenue. No hearing was conducted, as Good Shepherd withdrew their request for an extension because all required building permits had been issued by the City on April 16, 1990, prior to the scheduled April 24, 1990, expiration of the conditional use permit. MOVED BY MATHEWS, SECONDED BY ZIMMERMAN, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE REPORT. CARRIED. Transportation (Aviation) Transportation Committee Chairman Stredicke presented a report Committee recommending Council convene an executive session to review the proposed Public Works: Airport rates and rental agreements in a briefing to be presented by the Airport Land Lease Rate Increase Director. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY EDWARDS, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. (Executive session held at end of meeting.) Planning: Kenworth Councilman Stredicke asked that the Administration review the Kenworth Project project and come back to the Council with a concrete proposal to assist them in reactivating their project in Renton. Streets: NE 11 th & Councilman Stredicke pointed out that at the corner of NE 11 th and Whitman Whitman NE Dips NE, there are 3-4-inch dips in the road which create a liability for bicycle riders due to nonreplacement of risers or manhole covers. Because this is a safety hazard, he asked that Administration act on this problem without delay. Public Works: Local Councilman Keolker-Wheeler informed the Council of an update on the Hazardous Waste Plan Local Hazardous Waste Plan that is currently being discussed. She stated that there are concerns expressed by the Suburban Cities Association and a meeting has been scheduled to discuss these issues. She will present a report of that meeting to the Utilities Committee. Community Services Community Services Committee Chairman Zimmerman presented a report Committee recommending that the City Council concur with the Parks Board Parks: Maplewood Golf recommendation and authorize the revision of senior golf fees as follows: Course Fees, Senior Rates Summer (March 1st - October 31st) weekdays from $10 to $6 for 9 holes; from $10 to $9 for 18 holes. Winter (November 1st - February 28th) weekdays $7 for 18 holes (no change); weekends from $8 to $7 for 18 holes. MOVED BY ZIMMERMAN, SECONDED BY TANNER, COUNCIL CONCUR IN COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Utilities Committee Utilities Committee Chairman Nelson presented a report recommending Latecomer Agreement: concurrence with the Public Works Department's recommendation that the KBI Diversified, City deny KBI Diversified Ltd. latecomer agreement request referred Aberdeen Avenue 12/18/89, and refund the $1,000 deposit. MOVED BY NELSON, NE/NE 12th Street, SECONDED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, COUNCIL CONCUR IN Renton Ridge Apartments COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Public Works: KBI Utilities Committee Chairman Nelson presented a report recommending Diversified Ltd. Water concurrence with the Public Works Department's recommendation that the Line Oversizing, City participate in the adjusted request of KBI Diversified Ltd. for Aberdeen Avenue NE $18,412.25 for the oversizing of the watermain in Aberdeen Avenue NE. MOVED BY NELSON, SECONDED BY TANNER, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Public Works: Kohl Utilities Committee Chairman Nelson presented a report recommending Excavating, Inc., concurrence with the Public Works Department's recommendation that the Waterline Oversizing City participate in the Kohl Excavating, Inc. request for $4,375.00 for Reimbursement, Rainier oversizing of the water main in Rainier Avenue North for Kohl Park Avenue North (#W-549) Addition, Empire Way South and Oakesdale Avenue SW. MOVED BY NELSON, SECONDED BY TANNER, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Public Works: Storm and Utilities Committee Chairman Nelson presented a report recommending Surface Water Drainage concurrence with the Public Works Department's recommendation that the Ordinance 1990 King County Surface Water Design Manual be adopted and an ordinance be prepared to modify sections 4--22-8.A.4, 9D, 15 of the existing ordinance. The Committee recommended referral of the subject to the Ways and Means Committee for preparation of the ordinance. MOVED BY NELSON, SECONDED BY ZIMMERMAN, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE COMMITTEE REPORT MAY 7, 1990 GOOD SHEPHERD GROUP HOME (Committee of the Whole Meeting of April 23, 1990) The Committee of the Whole had been scheduled to hear a request from representatives of the Good Shepherd of Washington for an extension of the deadline ,for the conditional use permit for the Group Home proposed for N.E. 19th Street at Shelton Avenue. No hearing was conducted., however, as Good Shepherd withdrew their request for an extension. No extension was needed because all required building permits had been issued by the City on April 16, 1990, prior to the scheduled April 24, 1990 expiration of the conditional use permit. AL-k, Nancy Mews Council President CITY OF RENTON • City of Renton r""R 1990 Community Development Department RECEIVED CITY CLERK'S OFFICE Memorandum Date: April 23, 1990 To: City Council . From: 1\ Kenneth E. Nyberg Director, Community Development Department Subject: Good Shepherd Group Home, N.E. 19th at Shelton Avenue (010- 88) Staff Contact: Donald K. Erickson, AICP (2550) Chief - Current Planning Lenora Blauman (2550) Project Manager • This memorandum is written to confirm that the proponents for the Good Shepherd Group Home obtained necessary permits for the above-referenced project on April 20, 1990. Because the permits have been issued, the proponent has submitted to City Council, under separate cover, a letter rescinding the request for Council review of the project at this time. Thank you for your consideration. • , , ,, - . . ' . • Ctry 0..... r PfPrroN . App R 3 1990 • Pea/0 . - CI Ty ott.or.i istlie(......)/),c1.,. , /1 3 , $ ..,7..„3. ) . i (...c._.L 77_.. .c.ch,ci L--.t-L-c_, , C . C ' . c_.- E-,ii i ( .. . ". ' 4 (:;.. ....) (?_-- S. , i) . ... • . / . .\_,, L4_G,-,:".. .'./1 : ..1,•1-.e.‘7 4t.-.1 i .k..c_...2.Zi c-1) ,t..j '.e:0 .t...A.,t,c_c_4) 6 10-L.,(_,J 4.tv I 1 t 7 ' . .( - ' • l/.,) • .• .,..., .4. .z... c.4_ L.L.L., — re, , •c:L.k_c:::::,-*i Z-7..c.,1-7—) i k -Ee... i (11.)--6) 66/ -(,) (,.4_,/,/_..`z.t_k_./ j '2., /,', ) c 1..u.(..., & V.C_6:..L..L.- .-)L_P-i..-1_,/ 'lc. ..A,c) e.-z _e_.../ ,...• ; -) I . 1 _.".r .$'(-e-zi -le--A_.(_} 12..\-7..-ci,-)-k1-51,-E.cv 62.1- /47 l'''' (..,,,,61.., ;61••)' '-Lc_ ( -- c 14) / 1 (1 't )) (7. L-A-- (---) l'---& /2 L.,::L 1, 6)7,_.J. C.A.L, ./ (i-,-6-._) ,ti...c.„.-t-L.L-?,."---1---Lee-'"(./. °L;(--61-2.-.1_,.t-) (ILL-) (./.../ ,). //1__ __ ___Z.1...c -- - •.(,. , "44,,LiLkl/ t . , • - () . ii . z.14__d-/--z,AL.<?....,1J-e. .(..-1 .,::C,j;-(---e.„) • t---/-4-1_(.-.L.LIZ--1.-y:-./.7 6--4.—Z..- , Zc....fri-L-4---e-.2.-,-- z.c .--6.'...../ 0 . :: L--&.1-e,.e_i ,.0 7-z_L.4.....-z• L.c..,-,:z #,4 o 'Zi-L.c,1 t.....v,:a.._,_.,.c2,L.,z--2,--L.,) t.,..-) 1 LC ....:-/ .,(-1 Z-7- - ." d7' /1. ) . . . (3)r? ,. ,' <_-c-0 . .., : 6-/ fy j; 1. 7 1 7 / . ((.. .L)-e.) 7. /E 1 t-Z{ / L.:71--). 61 FO 6 '1,-- . . R-0 10 •-c‘6" 44e, Y � � „ 0 CITY OF RENTON Wl, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Housing and Human Resources John Morris,'Coordinator May 1, 1990 PLANNING DIVISION Ed Ball, President CITY OF RENTON Good.Shepherd of Washington • 13817 171st Ave. NE MAY 1 8 1990 Redmond, WA 98052 • R C VED Dear Ed, As we have discussed, the City of Renton has questions related to the two group home projects your organization has been, and continues to be, in the process of developing in Renton. These questions are primarily programmatic in nature and are necessitated by recent changes in your leadership, and by the length of time that has transpired since you were allocated project development funds. I am suggesting the following process to address the questions, and resolve any issues that they raise. All significant questions will be put in writing in this letter. All of your answers should likewise be in writing, in a letter addressed to me. I will review your responses and ask for clarifications as needed. A staff report will be prepared for use by the Housing and Human Resources.Citizens Advisory Committee. The Committee has previously expressed a desire to discuss the group home projects with you, and your response to my letter will be an excellent opportunity for that discussion to occur. Issue: Religion Has your Board acted in an official capacity in agreeing to the following provisions? In addition to, and not in substitution for, other provisions of this Agreement regarding the provision of management services for Good Shepherd Home, the management agent: 17. 1. represents that it is, or may be deemed to be, a religious or denominational institution or organization, or an organization operated for religious purposes which is supervised or controlled.by or in connection with a religious or denominational institution or organization; • 2. agrees on behalf of itself, its employees, agents and subcontractors, that, in connection with such management services: • a. it iy1ll not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment on the basis of religion and will not limit employment or give preference in employment to persons on the basis of religion. b. it will not discriminate against any person applying for residency on the basis of religion.and will not limit such residency or give preference to persons on the basis of religion; 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2553 Facsimile (206) 235-2513 . Ed Ball May 1, 1990 Page 2 c. it will provide no religious instruction or counselling, conduct no religious worship or services, engage in no religious proselytizing, and exert no other religious influence in the provision of such management services; and d. the facilities managed in whole or in part under this Agreement shall contain no • - sectarian or religious symbols or decorations, except for those symbols or decorations posted by each resident in his or her immediate living area. If the Board has officially acted on these provisions, can you provide the City with a certified copy of the Board minutes documenting that action? Based on the keynote address at the Annual Meeting of Good Shepherd Lutheran Home of the West held March 17, 1990, contained in Good Shepherd Hab Bits, religion plays a significant role in Good Shepherd Group Homes. Can you explain how the Board was able to reconcile its religious role with HUD and Block Grant requirements that severely reduce that role. Issue: Revisions of By-Laws Does Good Shepherd Lutheran Home of the West want to change the existing By-Laws of Good Shepherd of Washington? If yes, could you please highlight the changes and provide a brief explanation of why the change is proposed, and what you anticipate its effects will be? Your application indicates that "The Board is composed of local people, who with the help of the sponsor, Good Shepherd Lutheran Home of the West, are guiding development." Local representation on the Board is vital from our perspective. Please indicate how this element will continue to be incorporated into your organization.• . Issue: Service to Renton Residents Your original application for Block Grants funds stated in response to the question: "Does the proposed project target Renton as its primary service area?" that "Case management, Department of Developmental Disabilities makes all referrals to the provider, in this case Good Shepherd. Although we don't have absolute control of who is accepted into the home, we will do every thing within our power to ensure that Renton residents will be given priority." Is this still an accurate statement of your intentions? Explain. Issue: Day to Day Management of the Facility In response to the question: Indicate who on your staff will be responsible for this project, and list their qualification. You provided the following statement: "Once the home is built, the Habilitation Coord,inator will be in charge. That person's qualifications are a Master's Degree in a field related to P#ie position requirements with a minimum of two years relevant experience in MR/DD field, or a Bachelor's Degree in the field related to the position requirements with a minimum of four years relevant experience in MR/DD field." Is this still an accurate statement of your intentions? Explain. • • Ed Ball May 1, 1990 Page 3 Issue: Client Profile Staff, Council, and citizens were repeatedly told these homes would be for the severely developmentally disabled. Is this still the case? Explain, if necessary, and include your working definition of the severely developmentally disabled. If I can be of any help in working with you on your responses to these questions, please give me a call. • Sincerely,, • ohn Morris . , •,1 • John/goodshep tl ;„-„;,,,, • • • • fir CITY OF RENTON 4 APR 261990 RECEIVED CITY OF RENTON CITY CLERK'S OFFICE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM DATE: April 25, 1990 \ TO: Marilyn Petersen, City Clerk �. FROM: Ronald G. Nelson lt./ Building and Housing Manager SUBJECT: Performance Bond Nos. 153 92 78 0 009 and ( ram. =''L'- 8 1 153 92 78 0008 Good Shepherd of Washington/B15619 4001 NE 19th Street Street Cleaning and Maint. and Landscaping Bonds Enclosed please find for your files the original copies of the above referenced Performance Bonds received this date from The Continental Insurance Company, each in the amount of $1, 000 . 00 . RGN:mjp RGN#5:GoodShep PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF RENTON GOOD SHEPHERD OF WASHINGTON APR 2 6199O 13817 171ST Avenue N.E. Redmond, WA 98052 April 24, 1990 Ms. Lenora Blauman 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Wa 98055 Re: Good Shepherd Group Homes 4001 N.E. 19th and 1025 Olympia Street Dear Ms. Blauman: Thank you so much for working through the issues on our 19th Street site. As we proceed to HUD with our formal request for a firm commitment we need to supply the lender with a letter from the City of Renton -saying that our two sites are properly zoned. One letter for each site is preferable. The letter should reference the project and proposed occupancy (6 units) , e.g. "I am familiar with plans for the proposed. Good Shepherd project, and find that it complies with all applicable zoning requirements and restrictions . The site is properly zoned to allow 6 handicapped units and the building permit has been properly issued. " Please address your letter to the following: U.S. Department of HUD c/o Seattle Mortgage Company 1500 112th Avenue S.E. Bellevue, WA 98004 We are planning to submit by May 5 , 1990 and ask for your attention as soon as possible. As the permit has not been issued for the Olympia Street site, do not reference that point. If you have any questions please give me a call on 881-1965 or call John Henkle, our Housing Consultant on 451- 2102 . Very truly yours , COOP► SHEPHER OF WASHINGTON AI i Edward Ball President Bon €o . 153 92 78 0009 PERFORMANCE BOND KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, That we GOOD SHEPHERD OF WASHINGTON as Principal , and THE CONTINENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY, a corporation of the State of New Hampshire, and having its principal office at New York, as Surety are held and firmly bound unto CITY OF RENTON, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055 in the sum of ONE THOUSAND AND NO/100 ($1 , 000 . 00) DOLLARS, for which sum well and truly to be paid, said Principal hereby binds ourselves, our heirs , executors, administrators, successors and assigns , jointly and severally, firmly by these presents . IN WITNESS WHEREOF, We have hereunto set our hands and seals this 11th day of April,. A.D. 1990 . THE CONDITION OF THIS OBLIGATION IS SUCH, that WHEREAS, the above bounden GOOD SHEPHERD OF WASHINGTON has obtained or is about to obtain an extension under the conditional use permit# CU-R-010-88, from the said CITY OF RENTON and as a condition precedent to said extension is required to provide a bond to guarantee Street Cleaning during course of construction . NOW, THEREFORE, if the said GOOD SHEPHERD OF WASHINGTON shall , during the period beginning on the lath day of April , 1990 and ending on the 11th day of April, 199.1, faithfully observe and honestly comply with the provisions of the conditional use permit and referenced extension as respects Street Cleaning during course of construction then this obligation shall become void and of no effect otherwise to be and remain in full force and virtue in law. PROVIDED, HOWEVER, that this bond may be renewed from year to year by continuation certificate executed by said Surety. GOOD H PHERD OF W S, IGTON 6/1=t-tNe71-14 BY: THE CON NE TAL INSURANCE CO. Y: B.L. `Kell /, Attorney-in-Fact g CITY OF RENTON q qE CEI V ED rl APR 1 8 1990 BUILDING DIVISION • • • • • • • ACKNOWLEDGEMENT STATE OF MINNESOTA) ss . COUNTY 'OF HENNEPIN) ' On this 11th day of April , 1990 before me a Notary Public within said County, personally appeared B.L. Kellar to me personally known, who being by me duly sworn did say that She is the Attorney-in-Fact of THE CONTINENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY the corporation named in the foregoing instrument, and that the seal affixed' to said instrument is the Corporate Seal of said corporation, and that said instrument was signed and sealed in behalf of said corporation by' • authority of its Board of Directors and said B.L. Kellar acknowledged said instrument to be the• free act and deed of said corporation. KAAANNAmmAmmotownowwwww • NOW BETH Pi-NI IOTA WRY COUNTY z_ )� a467n_c„e- __'�';,� Notali M►c - -_E*.t Mr.5.1996 woNAmmomm,rowmAmmovommNs • Thr ' ontinental Insurance i- mpany 8C rtrtaiden Lane, New York, New Tork 10038 GENERAL POWER OF ATTORNEY • Know all men by these Presents, That THE CONTINENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY has made, constituted and appointed,and by these presents does make,constitute and appoint John Kahl or Donald R. Berndt or Donald L. Meier or B. L. Kellar or H. A. Kloos or Max Hoaglin all. of Minneapolis, Minnesota, EACH its true and lawful attorney for it and in its name, place,and stead to execute on behalf of the said Company, as surety,bonds, undertakings and contracts of suretyship to be given to all obligees provided that no bond or undertaking or contract of suretyship executed under this authority shall exceed in amount.the sum of One Million (S1,000,000.) Dollars. This Power of Attorney is granted and is signed and sealed by facsimile under and by the authority of the following Resolu- tion adopted by the Board of Directors of the Company on the 1st day of November, 1977: "RESOLVED. mat the Chairman of the Board, the Vice Chairman of the Board, the President, an Executive Vice President or a Senior Vice Presi- dent or a V,ce President of the Company, be and that each or any of them is. authorized to execute Powers of Attorney qualifying the attorney named in the given Power of Attorney to execute in behalf. of the Company, bonds, undertakings and all contracts of suretyship: and that an Assistant Vice President, a Secretary or an Assistant Secretary be.'and that each or any of them hereby ta, authorized to attest the execution Of any such Power of Attorney, and to attach thereto the seal of the Company. FURTHER RESOLVED.that the signatures of such officers and the seal of the Company may be affixed to any such Power of Attorney or to any certificate rotating thereto by facsimile,and any such Power of Attorney or certificate bearing such facsimile signatures or facsimile seal shalt be valid and binding upon the Company when so affixed and in the future with respect to any bond,undertaking or contract of suretyship to which it is attach- ed " In Witness Whereof, THE CONTINENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY has caused its official seal to be hereunto affixed, and these presents to be signed by one of its Vice Presidents and attested by one of its Assistant Vice Presidents this 3rd day of January, 1978. Attest: THE CONTINENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY • By 4::(7737°. - .r .401"F .60001 Morns L Ford Assistant Vice-Pres+Oent ``r� +f ~� ' 1 K rluesch. Vice`Pree,dent STATE OF NEW YORK, Y.: COUNTY OF NEW YORK, On this 3rd day of January, 1978, before me personally came R. K. Ruesch, to me known, who being by me duly sworn, did depose and say that he resides in New Providence, in the County of Union, State of New Jersey. at 35 Alden Road; that he is a Vice President of THE CONTINENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY, the corporation described in and which executed the above instrument: that he knows the seal of the said corporation; that the seal affixed to the said instrument is such corporate seal; that it was so affixed by order of the Board of Directors of said corporation and that he signed his name thereto by like order. �7 +o tae O r,•.: 1• ii M ,'.,�Uali�;' HERBERT HOFFMAN y!••t ,.f NOTARY PUBLIC State or New York • No.52.1621035 Dual n Surtol,county CERTIFICATE Cert filed in N Y Co Mks Office Cortxntssrort Ewes Much 30 1979 I, the undersigned, an Assistant Secretary of.THE CONTINENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY, a New Hampshire corporation, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing and attached Power of Attorney remains in full force and has not been revoked: and furthermore that the Resolution of the Board of Directors, set forth in the said Power of Attorney, is now in force Signed and sealed at the City of New York. Dated the llthdaY of April , 19 90. James M Keene Assistent Secretary id No . 153 92 78 0008 PERFORMANCE BOND. • KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, That we GOOD SHEPHERD OF WASHINGTON as Principal, and THE CONTINENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY, a corporation of the State of New Hampshire, and having its principal office at New York, as Surety are held and firmly bound unto CITY OF RENTON, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055 in the sum of ONE THOUSAND AND NO/100 ($1 , 000 .= )0) DOLLARS, for which sum well and truly to be paid, said Principal hereby binds ourselves, our heirs, .executors, administrators , successors and . assigns , jointly and severally, firmly by these presents . . IN WITNESS WHEREOF, We have hereunto set our hands and seals this 11th dayof April , A.D. 1990 . THE CONDITION OF THIS OBLIGATION IS SUCH, that WHEREAS, the above bounden GOOD SHEPHERD OF WASHINGTON has obtained or is about to obtain an extension under the conditional use permit# CU-R-010-88, from the said CITY OF RENTON and as a condition precedent to said extension is ,required to provide a bond to guarantee Landscaping and Maintenance. NOW, THEREFORE, if the said GOOD SHEPHERD OF WASHINGTON shall , during the period beginning on the 11th day of April , 1990 and ending on the 11th day of April , 1991 , faithfully observe and honestly comply with the provisions of the conditional use permit and referenced extension as respects Landscaping and Maintenance then this obligation shall become void and of no effect otherwise to be. and remain in full force and virtue in law, PROVIDED, HOWEVER, that this bond may be renewed from year to year by continuation certificate executed by said Surety. GOOD S .EPHERD OF WASHINGTON f. BY: - 'ZL. IZ<L'( i LeLf • n :: ?? 7z;:: CO. BY: B'.L. K lla , rney-in-Fact CITY OF RENTON C E U E ,, q APR 18199E VI - c . ACKNOWLEDGEMENT STATE OF MINNESOTA) ss . COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) On this 11th day of April , 1990 before me a Notary Public within said County, personally appeared B.L. Kellar to me personally known, who being by me duly sworn did say that she is the Attorney-in-Fact of THE CONTINENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY the corporation named in the foregoing instrument, and that the seal affixed to said instrument is the Corporate Seal of said corporation, and that said instrument was signed and sealed in behalf of said corporation by authority of its Board of Directors and said B.L. Kellar acknowledged said instrument to be the free act and deed of said corporation. ELIZABETH A.KEPPLINGER `C�' / �� �` �. (tri.1e, NOTARY PUBLIC—MINNESOTA Notary Pub 1 i c '8 . RAMSEY COUNTY My Commission Expires Mar 5, )"" The' r;ontinental Insurance C mpany 8( ___aiden Lane, New York, New 'II ur'k 10038 GENERAL POWER OF ATTORNEY Know all men by these Presents, That THE CONTINENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY has made, constituted and appointed, and by these presents does make,constitute and appoint John Kahl or Donald R. Berndt or Donald L. Meier or B. L. Kellar or H. A. Kloos or Max Hoaglin all of Minneapolis, Minnesota, EACH its true and lawful attorney for it and in its name, place,and stead to execute on behalf of the said Company, as surety,bonds, undertakings and contracts of suretyship to be given to all obligees provided that no bond or undertaking or contract of suretyship executed under this authority shall exceed in amount the sum of One Million (S1,000,000.) Dollars. This Power of Attorney is granted and is signed and sealed by facsimile under and by the authority of the following Resolu- tion adopted by the Board of Directors of the Company on the 1st day of November, 1977: • "RESOLVED. that the Chairman of me Board, the Vice Chairman of the Board. the President, an Executive Vice President or a Senior Vice Presi- dent or a Vice President of the Company. be and that each or any of them is, authorized to execute Powers of Attorney Qualifying the attorney named in,the given Power of Attorney to.execute in behalf of the Company,.bonds. undertakings and all contracts of suretyship: and that an Assistant Vice President, a Secretary or an Assistant Secretary be. and that each or any of them hereby is, authorized to attest the execution of any such Power of Attorney, and to attach thereto the Bali of the Company. FURTHER RESOLVED.that the signatures of such officers and the seat of the Company may be affixed to any such Power of Attorney or to any certificate relating thereto by facsimile.and any such Power of Attorney or certificate bearing such facsimile signatures or facsimile seal shall be valid and binding upon the Company when so affixed and in the future with respect to any bond,undertaking or contract of suretyship to which it is attach- in Whereof, THE TAL E these presents be signed by oneO of itsNVice Presidentsd C and COMPANY att seed by ones c of sused its Assistant Vicecial Seal Presidentsthis 3rd affixed, dayandof January, 1978. • Attest: THE CONTINENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY By 'v. 4%-i 4401"r doilli ,04,:z...e... ...LIp�• if:_2,70 _ •- / Morns L Ford Assistant Vice-Pre y��' •"•f: went R K Ruesch. Vice-President STATE OF NEW YORK, • as.: COUNTY OF NEW YORK, On this 3rd day of January, 1978, before me personally came R. K. Ruesch, to me known, who being by me duly sworn, did depose and say that he resides in New Providence, in the County of Union, State of New Jersey, at 35 Alden Road; that he is a Vice President of THE CONTINENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY, the corporation described in and which executed the above instrument; that he knows the seal of the said corporation; that the seal affixed to the said instrument is such corporate seal;' that it was so affixed by order of the Board of Directors of said corporation and that he signed his name thereto by like order. /474 //Of/7)ta...,..; • uu'�•fr HERBERT IIOFFMAN ti`;„.f NOTARY PUBLIC State of,New York No.52.1821035 0ual in Sutton County CERTIFICATE Can filed in N Y Ca Ctt.s Office Co nOUSS n ElltareS Natal 30 1979 • I. the undersigned, an.Assistant Secretary of THE•CONTINENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY, a New Hampshire corporation, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing and attached Power of Attorney remains in full force and has not been revoked: and furthermore that the Resolution of the Board of Directors, set forth in the said Power of Attorney, is now in force Signed and sealed at the City of New York. Dated the 11th day of Apri 1 , 19 9 0, • 272 7.' "C.....4.,e. (t: 11. sy:i - r James IAKeane Assistant Secretary ±` " • CITA_ OF RENTON "1 Community Development Department Earl Clymer, Mayor Kenneth E.Nyberg,Director April 30, 1990 U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development c/o Seattle Mortgage Company 1500 112th Avenue S.E. Bellevue, Washington 98004 RE: Good Shepherd of Washington, Group Home -4001 N.E. 19th Street (R 010-88) Ladies/Gentlemen: At the request of Edward Ball, President of Good Shepherd of Washington, I am writing to confirm the current status of the above-referenced project. On April 24, 1989, the City of Renton confirmed reclassification of the site to General Use (G-1) by Ordinance No. 4212 (See Attachment #1) . Under the City of Renton Zoning Code, group homes are allowed as a conditional use in the G-1 zone. The City has granted the applicant a conditional use permit to develop a group home for developmentally disabled adults at this site; the proposed facility conforms to all applicable Zoning Ordinance development standards for group homes in the G-1 zone (See Attachment #2) . A building permit for the home was issued by the City on April 20, 1990 (See Attachment #3) . If you have questions or require additional information, please contact me at 235-2550 . Sincerely, ) Lenora Blauman Senior Planner 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 CITY OF RENTON City of Renton R aR c 3 1990 Community Development Department RECEIVED CITY CLERK'S OFFICE Memorandum Date: April 23, 1990 To: City Council From: \ � Kenneth E. Nyberg rA t.' Director, Community Development Department Subject: 4 Good Shepherd Group Home, N.E. 19th at Shelton Avenue (010- 88) Staff Contact: Donald K. Erickson, AICP (2550) Chief - Current Planning • Lenora Blauman (2550) Project Manager This memorandum is written to confirm that the proponents for the Good Shepherd Group Home obtained necessary permits for the above-referenced project on April 20, 1990. Because the permits have been issued, the proponent has submitted to City Council, under separate cover, a letter rescinding the request for Council review of the project at this time. Thank you for your consideration. , • • . orripop • . AstiroN ts,), . Rs_ lot • ,onryRofrivo , , „ . . (LLz„A/ 05- 'Z.ieD6Y Kri-L'e20. : 4'50567' . • 6'1 (j Z6 " 60-1A } 6w • ,/t-i-A7.T 1"4-1L271;t-I (e276) tI ..//2)7.:.4-&is'2, / 46-)) --ak) La-0zJ /9,61)ty1Art-ur 7e::: et117--, I 474/‘' ZZ)-e.) :45 cto -Li ck ,:r n/Let.i(o) be ZJL • kit>11-' - • tt,% 1-1--ej V-Lci 1 -4-9 • . -• • 72 • • •- ./7/ 1 .1 • • 4 - . • „ © City of Kenton._ s Building Division BUILDING PERM- PERMIT B15619 JOB B15619 OFFICE: 235-2540 INSPECTIONS: 235-2542 Permission is hereby given to do the following described work, according to the condi ISSUED 04/20/90 tions hereon and according to the approved plans and specifications pertaining ' thereto, subject to compliance with the Ordinances of the City of Renton. NEW GROUP RESIDENCE 0423059259 Job Address 4001 NE 19TH ST Tenant Suite ode/ OWNER VALUt971/"Epe... .74,cez Name GOOD SHEPHER LUTHERAN Phone CONSTRUCTION 150 ,000 .00 Address ROUTE 4 BOX 96 CORNELIUS OR 97113 Permit Fee 814.50 Plan Check Fee 529.42 CONTRACTOR Add-on Fee 54.00 Name TBD Phone Other Fee 13.50 Address TOTAL FEE ' 1 ,411 .42 Contr. Lic. Tax No. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT NO WORK IS TO BE DONE SUBJECT TO COMPLIANCE WITH THE ORDINANCES EXCEPT AS DESCRIBED ABOVE AND IN APPROVED PLANS OF THE CITY OF RENTON AND INFORMATION FILED AND SPECIFICATIONS AND THAT ALL WORK IS TO HEREWITH THIS PERMIT IS GRANTED. . CONFORM TO RENTON CODES AND ORDINANCES. BU I IAL Applicant By a © City of Renton BUILDING PERMIT 24 HOUR NOTICE REQUIRED FOR ALL Building Division PERMIT 815619 INSPECTIONS Inspection Record JOB 815619 Job Address 4001 NE 19TH ST Tenant Owner GOOD SHEPHER LUTHERAN Suite Contractor TBD Nature of Work NEW GROUP RESIDENCE Total Fee $1 ,411 .42 0423059259 Issued 04/20/90 By( DATE INSP. DATE INSP. DATE INSP. f. FOOTING 2 FOUNDATION 23 FRAMING WALL 4 OTHER 5 SHEARWALL 6 INSULATION '7 ROOFS 8 RE-STEEL 9 FINAL. DO NOT POUR CONCRETE UNTIL APPROVED CALL FOR INSPECTIONS DO NOT COVER UNTIL APPROVED DO NOT OCCUPY UNTIL FINAL INSPECTION COMPLETE BEFORE WORK NPECIIuN I. HOON lzR1Ngb4c. RETE POST THIS RECORD AT JOB SITE OI�I hi 5 4 CORRECTIONS April. 1990 Renton City Council Minutes Page 119 CORRESPONDENCE Correspondence was read from Edward L. Ball, President, Good Shepherd of Citizen Comment Ball - Washington, 13817 - 171st Avenue NE, Redmond, requesting approval of a Good Shepherd Request one-year extension of the conditional use permit, the rezone, and restrictive for Rezone Extension, covenants for property at 19th and Shelton Avenue, #R-010-88, proposed for NE 19th StreetR-010-88 development of a group home for the developmentally disabled. MOVED BY MATHEWS, SECONDED BY ZIMMERMAN, COUNCIL REFER THIS CORRESPONDENCE TO THE COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE. CARRIED. (Meeting to be held on 4-23-90.) Citizen Comment: Nielsen Correspondence was read from Bruce and Kathy Nielsen, 8439 - 110th - Duncan Annexation Avenue SE, Renton, expressing concern regarding potential problems such as overcrowding of schools, increased traffic, water drainage, and environmental impact as a result of the Duncan Annexation (42 acres bounded by Jones and Lincoln Avenues NE, NE 43rd Street, 112th SE and NE 36th Street). MOVED BY MATHEWS, SECONDED BY ZIMMERMAN, COUNCIL REFER THIS CORRESPONDENCE TO THE OFFICIAL DUNCAN ANNEXATION FILE. CARRIED. Citizen Comment Carlson Letter from Duane G. Carlson, M.D., Valley Internal Medicine, Inc., 4011 - Valley Medical Center Talbot Road South, Suite 500, Renton, expressed concern regarding parking Parking problems at the Valley Medical Center and Talbot Professional Center. MOVED BY MATHEWS, SECONDED BY ZIMMERMAN, COUNCIL REFER THIS MATTER TO THE ADMINISTRATION. CARRIED. AWC: Redmond, 1990 Correspondence was read from Doreen Marchione, Mayor of the City of King County Redmond, requesting comments from Council members and staff on the Comprehensive Plan proposed resolution for the 1990 King County Comprehensive Plan Update to Update insure inclusion of policies addressing city/county relationships. MOVED BY MATHEWS, SECONDED BY ZIMMERMAN, COUNCIL REFER THIS MATTER TO THE ADMINISTRATION. CARRIED. AWC: Normandy Park, Correspondence from the City of Normandy Park, 801 SW 174th Street, Growth Management Bill Normandy Park, requested members of the Suburban Cities Association to review the Growth Management Bill and support the emergency Resolution passed by the Normandy Park City Council requesting Governor Gardner to veto Section 18, (3) which exempts port districts and municipal airports from the requirement of a capital facilities plan. MOVED BY MATHEWS, SECONDED BY ZIMMERMAN, COUNCIL REFER THIS MATTER TO THE ADMINISTRATION. CARRIED. Citizen Comment: Post - Correspondence from George Post, 1122 South 27th Place, Renton, requested Victoria Hills Phase II a status report on Victoria Hills Phase II apartment development. The letter FPUD-042-85 questioned Benson Road improvements, incomplete landscaping, and occupation of the buildings prior to completion of Benson Road improvement project. MOVED BY EDWARDS, SECONDED BY ZIMMERMAN, COUNCIL REFER THIS MATTER TO THE ADMINISTRATION. CARRIED. Citizen Comment: Correspondence from Diana Ledbury, 511 Stevens Court NW, Renton, Ledbury - Aquifer emphasized the importance of aquifer protection to the City of Renton. Protection MOVED BY NELSON, SECONDED BY ZIMMERMAN, COUNCIL REFER THIS LETTER TO THE ADMINISTRATION. CARRIED. OLD BUSINESS The Committee of the Whole met on April 9, 1990 to hear a presentation of Committee of the Whole the North Renton Street Improvement recommendations from the Public Public Works: North Works Department. Following the presentation and discussion, a motion was Renton Street passed to approve the concept and refer stage one to the Transportation Improvements Committee for further refinement. The matter of zoning in North Renton as affected by the Transportation Plan, was referred to the Planning and Development Committee to coordinate efforts with the Planning Commission. Council President Mathews explained that the intent of the second motion was to have the same staff representative coordinate these two issues. MOVED BY MATHEWS, SECONDED BY NELSON, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE REPORT. CARRIED. 4 >L ( 7. April 12, 1990 • Renton City Council City of Renton 200 Mill Ave. S. Renton, WA 98055 SUBJECT: Good Shepherd Group Homes This letter is to request that the Renton City Council place Good Shepherd of Washington on the Council meeting agenda for April 16, 1990. The purpose for this is to obtain Council approval for a one year extension of the Conditional Use Permit for the property at 19th and Shelton Ave. The restrictive covenants of that property are: 1. Good Shepherd of Washington agrees that the property shall be used for a group home for not more than six developmentally disabled adults. 2. Good Shepherd of Washington agrees that in all other respects the use limitations on the property shall be those of the R-1 zoning code. 3. Good Shepherd of Washington agrees that the failure to develop the property according to the terms of the Conditional Use Permit within one year, or to otherwise abandon the specific Conditional Use Permit or discontinue this group home for any reason, shall cause the property to revert to its prior R-1 zoning classification. Although the progress of the Good Shepherd Homes has not met our expectations, we believe that every obstacle to a September, 1990 ground breaking will soon be removed. A letter signed by Rob Arbros of the Seattle HUD office which supports this belief, will be distributed under separate cover. S' ce ely, CITY OF RENTON Edward L. Ball, President Good Shepherd of Washington �� 1990 13817 171 Ave. NE Redmond, WA 98052 RECEIVED CITY CLERK'S OFFICE PC: Ron Drews GSW Board Members File �� -�- 5 ir1-14.q-90 .4. t 3,9� . ID s fir: CITA ;')F RENTON waLL ." Finance Department Earl Clymer, Mayor April 18, 1990 Mr. Edward L. Ball, President Good Shepherd of Washington 13817 171st Avenue NE Redmond, WA 98052 Re: Extension Request for Good Shepherd Rezone, R-010-88; NE 19th Street and Shelton Avenue NE Dear Mr. Ball: Your letter requesting an extension of the referenced rezone was read at the Renton City Council meeting of April 16, 1990, and referred to the Council's Committee of the Whole for review. The Committee of the Whole will meet to discuss this matter on Monday, April 23, 1990, at 8:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building. For additional information, please contact either this office or the Community Development Director, Kenneth Nyberg, at 235-2518. Sincerely, Marilyn J. P rsen, CMC City Clerk 235-2502 cc: Mayor Council President Community Development Director 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 •......a�o - U.S. Departmer ti Housing and Urban Development ry Seattle Office, eioyion X �` Arcade Plaza Building 1321 Second Avenue Seattle, Washington 98101-2058 April 16, 1990 Ms. Nancy L. Mathews President Renton City Council 200 Mill Avenue S. Renton, Washington 98055 Dear Ms. Mathews: SUBJECT: Good Shepherd II, 127-EH125 As requested by Ron Drews of Good Shepherd Lutheran Home of the West, this letter is to provide you with a status of the subject Section 202 project. The project includes a site located at N.E. 19th Street in Renton. This site, we understand, faces a conditional use rezone deadline shortly. My staff advises me that we have completed technical processing of the Firm Commitment application for the project. Pending receipt of several revised exhibit items (e.g. , financial statements/credit information on the newly-selected contractor), we would be in a position to issue the Firm Commitment shortly. Assuming such items are satisfactorily received soon and any consequent reprocessing is. minimal , we would expect that a Firm Commitment could be issued and the project start within the next 30 - 60 days. The only factor that might delay the schedule is if we have to obtain a waiver, e.g., to increase the Section 8 rents above 110 percent of Fair Market Rents, from HUD Headquarters. We do not foresee needing such a waiver at this time. • • • • Also ;as-'requested by`- Mr. Drews, enclosed is a copy of the letter he presented;':to _,us':on =April.,:-2, 1990, indicating agreement by Good Shepherd:Lutheran Home 'of: the West to comply with HUD requirements on _.., -church-state Tissues.-= t, If you have questions about this letter, please contact me at the above address, Correspondence Code 10H, telephone 442-4373, or Bob Arbios, Chief of Housing Programs Branch, Correspondence Code 10HDH, telephone 442-1177. S. cerely, Diana W. Goodwin Shavey Regional Director Office of Housing Enclosure cc: Ron Drews, Good Shepherd Lutheran Home of the West John Morris, City of Renton - — - - - - - — � . •� . . w c o r rc G l.a 1 lJ fY F' Ca .3 • • Y00 er Lutheran Home of the West Corporate Office:Terra Bella,California 93270 Ron Drews • Regional Director• Northwest Region Rt.4. Box 96 • Cornelius, Op 97113 •(503) 648-8976 GOOD SHEPHERD REGIONS Central California,Terra Bello Northern California,Fremont Southern California,El Toro Arizona, eCelius,Oregon March 28, 1990 Rocky Mountain,Littleton,Colorado CORPORATE OFFICE F.D.Geske,Ph.D. Executive Director Bob Orbios, Chief 10650 Road 256 • Terra Be9a,California U.S. Department of H.U.D. ov sss-4425 Seattle Office Region 10 • 1321 2nd Ave. S.W. Seattle, Washington 90101 Dear Bob, This letter is convey to you the results of a recent Good Shepherd Lutheran Home of the West Board of Director's meeting. At this meeting the Board agreed to comply with the points that H.U.D. was raising regarding the reli- gious issues. The Board's decision of moving ahead with the projects is only contingent on being able to retain the monies committed from various sources. The Board reaffirmed it's desire to move forward as quickly as possible to opening the 4 homes. Sincerely, Ron Drews • Director Northwest Region Mentally retarded people are also created in God's image. K-0 !9 B L No. 153 92 78 0008 PERFORMANCE BOND KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, That we GOOD SHEPHERD OF WASHINGTON as Principal , and THE CONTINENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY, a corporation of the State of New Hampshire, and having its principal office at New York, as Surety are held and fir;nly bound unto CITY OF RENTON, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055 in the sum of ONE THOUSAND AND NO/100 ($1 , 000 . 00) DOLLARS, for which sum well and truly to be paid, said Principal hereby binds ourselves, our heirs , executors, administrators , successors and assigns , jointly and severally, firmly by these presents . IN WITNESS WHEREOF, We have hereunto set our hands and seals this 11th day of April , A.D. 1990 . THE CONDITION OF THIS OBLIGATION IS SUCH, that WHEREAS, the above bounden GOOD SHEPHERD OF WASHINGTON has obtained or is about to obtain an extension under the conditional use permit# CU-R-010-88, from the said CITY OF RENTON and as a condition precedent to said extension is required to provide a bond to guarantee Landscaping and Maintenance . NOW, THEREFORE, if the said GOOD SHEPHERD OF WASHINGTON shall , during the period beginning on the 11th day of April , 1990 and ending on the 11th day of April , 1991 , faithfully observe and honestly comply with the provisions of the conditional use permit and referenced extension as respects Landscaping and Maintenance then this obligation shall become void and of no effect otherwise to be and remain in full force and virtue in law. PROVIDED, HOWEVER, that this bond may be renewed from year to year by continuation certificate executed by said Surety. GOOD S EPHERD OF WASHINGTON B Y: /t-77r� ,0 01-66) THE CO T EN AL SURANCE CO. BY: B.L. lla ; ttorney-in-Fact r CRY OF RENTON �S C E I V E ! ®' APR 1 8 1990 ' BUILDING DIVISION ACKNOWLEDGEMENT STATE OF MINNESOTA) ss . COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) . 'On this 11th_ day of April , 1990 before me a Notary Public within said County, personally appeared B.L. Kellar. • to me personally known, who being by me duly sworn did say that she is the Attorney-in-Fact of , . . THE CONTINENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY the corporation ,,., named in ' the foregoing instrument, and that the seal affixed to said instrument is the Corporate Seal of said corporation, and that said instrument was signed and sealed in behalf of said corporation by ILO authority of its Board of • Directors and said 41 B.L. Kellar acknowledged said instrument to be the free act and deed of said corporation. tip'!` • ELIZABETH A KEPPLINGER 4;'�;,'. • NOTARY PUBLIC—MINNESOTA Notary6Ublic My Commission Expires Mar. 5, 1.C:'? The Continental Insurance Company 1 • , .. 1 . 8 laiden Lane, New York, New rk 10038 GENERAL POWER OF ATTORNEY • Know all men by these Presents, That THE CONTINENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY has made, constituted and appointed, and by these presents does make,constitute and appoint John Kahl or Donald R. Berndt or Donald L. Meier or B. L. Kellar or H. A. Kloos or' Max Hoaglin all of Minneapolis, Minnesota, EACH its true and lawful attorney for it and in its name, place,and stead to execute on behalf of the said Company, as surety,bonds, undertakings and contracts of suretyship to be given to •i. i;• all obligees provided that no bond or undertaking or contract of suretyship executed under this authority shall exceed in amount the sum of One Million (S1,000,000.) Dollars. This Power of Attorney is granted and is signed and sealed by facsimile under and by the authority of the following Resolu- tion adopted by the Board of Directors of the Company on the 1st day of November, 1977: •'RESOLVED, that the Chairman of the Board, the Vice Chairman of the Board, the President, an Executive Vice President or a Senior Vice Presi- dent or a V,ce President of the Company, be and that each or any of them is. authorized to execute Powers of Attorney qualifying the attorney named in the given Power of Attorney to execute in behalf of the Company, bonds, undertakings and all contracts of suretyship; and that an Assistant Vice President,,a Secretary or an Assistant Secretary be. and that each or any of them hereby is. authonzed, to attest the execution of any such Power of Attorney, and to attach thereto the Hal of the Company. . FURTHER RESOLVED.that the signatures of such officers and the seal of the Company may be affixed to any such Power of Attorney or to any certificate relating thereto by facsimile.and.any such Power of Attorney Or certificate bearing such facsimile signatures or facsimile seal shall be valid and binding upon the Company when ea affixed and in the future with respect to any bond,undertaking or contract of suretyship to which it is attach- In Witness Whereof, THE CONTINENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY has caused its official seal to be hereunto affixed, and these presents.to be signed by one of its Vice Presidents and attested by one of its Assistant Vice Presidents this 3rd day of January, 1978. Attest: THE CONTINENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY By . rea.,e....g.e:_163/...__ ' 17. -14—C) 4/01,11r Morris L Ford.Assistant Vice-Pros/dentter % R K Ruesch. Vice-President STATE OF NEW YORK, es.: COUNTY OF NEW YORK, On this 3rd day of January, 1978, before'me personally came R. K. Ruesch, to me known, who being by me duly sworn: did depose and say that he resides in New Providence, in the County of Union, State of New Jersey, at 35 Alden Road; that he is a Vice President of THE CONTINENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY, the corporation described in and which executed the above instrument; that he knows the seal of the said corporation; that the seal affixed to the said instrument is such Corporate seal; that it was so affixed by order of the Board of Directors of said corporation and that he signed his name thereto by like order. •o, ite 4' 1 r�OTal ..• �'`si+L.• 5'.°uuic:'r ,f, HERBERT HOFFMAN •r•. �,.,,i NOTARY PUBUC State of New York `" No.52•1821035 Oual in Suffolk County CERTIFICATE Cert hied inN Y Cc Cuts Office Commis=Ewes Ararat 30 1979 I, the undersigned, an Assistant Secretary of THE CONTINENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY, a New Hampshire corporation, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing and attached Power. of Attorney remains in full'force and has not been revoked: and furthermore that the Resolution of the Board of Directors, set forth in the said Power of Attorney, is now in force. Signed and sealed at the City of New York. Dated the 11th day of Apri 1 . 19 9 0 . 277 .21‘C,•%.4." • tft,, 7:::. %.,:i , - James Pa Assistant Secretary .t • U r rou s om e ets green light=.1- f, . .Renton: O= L. • .. = clearin :afie wa :fora tall disabled adults:: =`. with;ahe Lutheran Church. The - • _ _ ..' ..�...:•.: afternoon,- _ .g: .,.:,..:,,Y• _ y.-. --. By KATHY HALL;:, >;:< ;;yt:;rt <=,'.; -''The homes were first: ro Deed - ' �__._x:...::j...,•, . .,, .,.W.:ng,permit ,said Lenora Blau- p p issue was resolved last-Week;Mor Staff Reporter::=' - :. _ <�..,�•...>on' e s,o',,r-xr h e,e:-,ears.ago..and ran'into ca'lot=. ,'. :i4`r' - " N. a,'. .P`;man;John Morris'an,, --- nNelson,: t re y- g 'ris said: - :'_;f Good Shepherd_of Washin tons :,Renton,officials: workm •.on .the,::of problems,on`both:sides'of.the. k' t:: ° ::: <.; _ has;cut-the red.ta a that.dela edproject .';`r'i.`-�' gzK_:: :';;, "':`:° -fence; said Ed Ball 'president:Of `" To:'obtain" its-federal grants, :'constructio _red"; :of.a group:home_ate:`::,The 19th and Shelton site was the: Good Shepherd of Washington. Good Shepherd had to assure the ``;19th Street andShelton Avenue m less controversial.of two group - _ The city=lost some architectural- Department of Housing and Urban =the Renton Highlands;:';:.: homes planned for'Renton:.Asite- :drawings. in' recent'departmental Development it would refrain from '�=""=r�: "',,,,-i= near-.:Bethlehem Lutheran'Ctiurch; moves, :he'said; an the' Good . 'religious indoctrination or symbol- -The.nol pro.it, its oath, run-:: Which faced neighborhood`opposi- Shepherd organization was disrupt- ism, said Gerard'Sheehan of the Vining out of.time'onats_conditional= j tiori;'still has time left on'its condi- ed by the.recent'ouster of board. American Civil Liberties Union.': ;use permit;had requested a spot on - t:y, ;..:�: tional-use permit: ^=;.; ;°. ,:,, .:_._ members`Darlene::'Lang and Ed Ball said he:hopes to open the 1.-:the.:City Council' xtensiday;night ,.a.,:kwo' other Good:-Shepherd;. -Stanley::`:`:`'`' `'' : first home by fall. Good Shepherd agenda to..seek an extensionr- homes are planned for'the:Cascade One sticking point was the per= of the West operates group homes `However :=the remaining: ';` :Vista.area 'southeast of. Renton:•`: 'ceived church-state conflict arisingin Oregon and California, e said, g:. g . • blocks.were resolved late.Friday+; Each.would house'six developmen- from the corporation's affiliation but this is its first in Washington. \i5JAN GOOD SHEPHERD OF WASHINGTON 2 3 1990 11 'g`'��' 4751 South 172nd Place E C I� II �.� If, Seattle, Washington 98188 January 22 , 1990 Leonora Blauman, Senior Planner Community Development Department - Current Planning Planning Division City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 RE: Good Shepherd of Washington Group Home Proposal at 4001 N.E. 19th St. Dear Lenora, At this time, HUD is requiring concise documentation of all requirements associated with development of this project which were brought about as a result of the Conditional Use Permit, Re-Zone and Short Plat as well as those which came about as a result of the Building Permit Process . WE HAVE IDENTIFIED THE FOLLOWING AS A RESULT OF THE BUILDING PERMIT REVIEW PROCESS : 1) Traffic Engineer ' s Review - Street light and conduit under sidewalk. 2) Utility Engineer ' s Review - Sewer and Water Development. (As a result of action taken by Public Works and the City Council on Dec. 5, 1988, the Water Development will be taken care of by City staff, with Good Shepherd to participate in the amount of $6798) . 3) Storm Water Utility Review - Storm water retention system development requirement of a 54" storm water man hole in leu of a 48" . 4) Fire Prevention Bureau Review - a) Automatic Fire sprinkler system. b) Paved egress paths connecting all egress doors to parking lot. 5) Engineering Review - Development of Road, Sidewalks, Curbs and Gutters . 6) Planning Review - Landscaping the entire 35, 000 square foot parcel. Larger plant sizes at initial planting. More extensive landscaping throughout total site. - i Good Shepherd Request For Documentation Of Requirements - Page 2 THE FOLLOWING REQUIREMENTS ARE ASSOCIATED WITH THE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND RE-ZONE APPROVAL: 1) Extensive landscaping, greater number of plantings and larger shrubs . 2) A $1000 Landscaping Maintaince Bond. 3) Fencing on all sides of the property. 4) Lawn sprinkler hose bibs. Please attach a reduced copy or copies of the approved site plan which identifies the landscaping and the surface water retention system requirements. Attached is a partial list of sources of this information for your convenience. We sincerely appreciate your efforts in developing this documentation for us . Yours truly, Q / rlene R. Lai• Secretary aoG ay3 - ID L/1 Attachment DRL:tim SOURCES OF REQUIREMENTS ASSOCIATED WITH DEVELOPMENT OF GOOD SHEPHERD HOME AT 4001 N.E. 19TH ST. 1) City of Renton Engineering Plan Review Routing Slip, Item #1 specifies the requirement for a Street Light and Item #2 specifies the requirement for conduit under sidewalk. 2) City of Renton Planning Plan Review Routing Slip, Item #2 specifies the requirement for a $1000 Landscaping Maintaince Bond. 3) City of Renton Utilities Plan Review Routing Slip which identifies Water and Sewer Development requirements and the associated assessment costs . 4) November 19th Letter from Ken Nyberg, Acting Public Works Director stating the Public Works Department recommends that the City of Renton participate in the Water main development by having City crews install the water main and accepting from Good Shepherd the amount of $6, 798 for their share in the installation costs . 5) Utilities Committee Report dated December 5, 1988 which recommends the Public Works Proposal to the Renton City Council. 6) December 5, 1988 , Renton City Council Minutes stating City Council Concurrence in the Utilities Committee Recommendation. 7) The original ERC Determination of Non-Significance Mitigation Measures which identifies the requirement for a greater number of plantings and larger shrubs. 8) Preliminary Report to Hearing Examiner, Page 10, Item G, which states , "the home will be screened by extensive landscaping areas and by wood fencing" . 9) The Hearing Examiner' s July 15, 1988 report, Page 2 , Ms . Blauman' s report requests approval subject to conditions set out by staff; Page 4, Item #19, Staff recommendation states that the property will be fenced on all sides; and Page 8 , Item #5 states the requirement for development as represented in Exhibits 3, 4 and 5 which show a fence as a result of Staff review. 10) October 3, 1988 , Renton City Council Minutes which finalize the Re-Zone and Conditional Use Permit and specify the requirement for the landscaping maintaince bond in leu of the fully automatic irrigation system. October 16, 1989 Renton City Council Minutes Page 289 Ordinance #4244 An ordinance was read amending Chapter 2, Planning Commission, of Title II Board/Commission: (Commissions and Boards) of City Code by adding Section 2-207(C) entitled Planning Commission, private comprehensive plan changes and rezoning. MOVED BY KEOLKER- Private Comprehensive WHEELER, SECONDED BY REED, COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE Plan Changes AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. • Ways and Means Committee Chairman Trimm presented a report recommending approval of the following resolution: Resolution #2770 A resolution was read authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to execute. an CAG: 89-056, Pacific interlocal cooperative agreement with Pacific Medical Center, a public Medical Center corporation sponsored by the City of Seattle to provide medical care to low income citizens. Upon inquiry, City Attorney Warren explained that an interlocal agreement is required to allow the City of Seattle to do business in the City of Renton. MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY REED, COUNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED. Policy: Travel and Ways and Means Committee Chairman Trimm presented a report Business Expense recommending referral of the Travel and Business Expense Policy and Procedure to the Committee of the Whole for review at its October 23 workshop. MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY STREDICKE, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE RECOMMENDATION. CARRIED. NEW BUSINESS Councilwoman Keolker-Wheeler asked whether the City has a law prohibiting Streets: Joggers Prohibited joggers from using City streets rather than sidewalks. Streets: Campaign Signs, Noting campaign signs illegally posted in rights-of-way and sidewalk grates, Illegally Posted Councilwoman Keolker-Wheeler requested that all candidates be mailed second notice of the City's sign code requirements for candidates. PSCOG: Valley Councilwoman Mathews announced that the Valley Transportation Skateboard Transportation Steering Steering Committee will meet on 10/17/89 in Tukwila to discuss a traffic Committee benefit district between the four Valley cities and King County. A recent change in committee rules allows an equal vote to each jurisdiction, regardless of size. ADMINISTRATIVE Citizen inquiry of 10/2/89 regarding why the City of Bellevue had allocated REPORT $27,000 towards the purchase of the 19th and Shelton site in Renton for Rezone: Good Shepherd _ construction of a Good Shepherd group home: Letter from Seattle Mortgage, Group Home (NE' 19th dated 10/6/89, reported error in HUD funding application index pertaining Street), R-01a=88— to Good Shepherd of Washington II funds. The City of Bellevue block grant of $27,000 was actually awarded towards the purchase of 113th Street site located in unincorporated King County, not the 19th and Shelton site as erroneously shown on the index. AUDIENCE COMMENT Joan Walker, 1433 Monterey Avenue NE, Renton, Planning Commissioner, Citizen Comment: Walker reported highlights of recent Planning Association of Washington.Conference - PAW Conference in Port Angeles. She announced that three representatives from Renton were elected to the PAW Board of Directors: Barbara Schellert, former Planning Commissioner; Jeanette Samek-McKague, Senior Planner; and Rubin Yu, Senior Planner. ADJOURNMENT MOVED BY REED, SECONDED BY NELSON, COUNCIL ADJOURN THE MEETING. CARRIED. Time: 10:11 p.m. MAXINE E. MOTOR, CMC, City Clerk Recorder: Marilyn Petersen, CMC 10/16/89 • � /3 MAYOR'S ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT RESPONSE TO CITY COUNCIL INQUIRIES and CITIZEN CONCERNS October 12, 1989 Sub iect Dated • Good Shepherd Home funding allocation , October 2, 1989. Approved: • Earl Clymer, yor MEMORANDUM HOUSING AND HUMAN RESOURCES DATE: October 10, 1989 TO: Ken Nyberg FROM John Morris SUBJECT: Funding Sources for the Proposed Good Shepherd Group Home on 19th Street between Union and Shelton At the Monday, October 2. 1989 Council meeting, questions were raised and documentation subsequently provided that indicated the City of Bellevue had allocated funds to the 19th Street Good Shepherd Group Home in Renton. Staff inquired into this matter and found that the documentation was in error. Those errors have been corrected and the attached correspondence is submitted as evidence of that fact. Please call if you have questions or need clarification on this matter. PC: Mayor Clymer Brent McFall attachment VA1 �o,g4 0 CITY OF RENTOR4 R bGOOD SHEPHERD OF WASHINGTON OCT 1 3 1989 4751 SOUTH 172ND_ PLACE SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98188 RECEIVED CITY CLERK'S OFFICE RECEIVED October 5, 1989 OCT 1 3 1989 Renton City Council Richard Stredicke, President CITY OF RLiflu)N 200 Mill Avenue CITY COUNCIL Renton, Washington 98055 RE: Good Shepherd Group Home Proposal at 19th and Union. Dear Mr. Stredicke, This letter is in response to your concerns related to the Firm Application Document Index for Application 2013 . This Statement contains several errors : Catagory #3 Block Grant Awards and Uses of Funds: Item B should read City of Bellevue award of $27 , 000 for purchase of 113th Street site. (The Bellevue Block Grant funds have been allocated to a site in the County which is a combined effort between King County and the City of Bellevue) . Due to the fact that one site is located in the City of Renton and the other site is located in unincorporated King County, some confusion has ocurred as to which site has been awarded specific funds . To further clarify --- HUD 202 funds have been allocated toward the acquisition of the parcel located at 19th and Union. Item C. Is not a Block Grant Award. That item should be identified as a "City of Renton General Fund" award. Item F. should be omitted. This was not a committment of a specified amount of funds . There is a commitment on the part of the City of Renton Public Works to install the water main and Good Shepherd of Washington to pay their fair share. The appropriate corrections have made and a copy is enclosed. Thank-you for bringing this to our attention. S 'ncerely, 4Iireh Secretary Enclosure cc: Earl Clymer, Mayor Renton City Council Members John Morris :: SEATTLE -.,:... .,..4 M R T G AG E11:5 1500 112 Avenue N.E. Bellevue,WA 98004 (206)451-2102 October 6, 1989 FAX(206)453-0961 • Mr. John Morris ' Housing Development City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South _ Renton, Washington 98055 Re : Good Shepherd Group Home Dear Mr. Morris : We have reviewed our HUD Firm Application for funding and found that the index improperly labeled and • identified uses of some of the funding awards . We are enclosing a revised index noting that the Bellevue award was for the 113th Street site and the City of Renton award for $19 , 924 was from the City General Fund. These funding sources are important to the success of the project and we appreciate your continued assistance and cooperation. Thank you. Very truly yours , SEATTLE MORTGAGE COMPANY - n t )11 C'cr JhnG. Henklece President JGH:crf Enclosure : Revised Index cc: Darlene Lang, Good Shepherd of Washington II INDEX FIRM APPLICATION DOCUMENTS GOOD SHEPHERD OF WASHINGTON II 1 . Application 2013 Form 2 . Management Documents : A. Management Plan B . Management Entity Profile Form HUD 9832 C . Management Certification Form HUD 9839B D. Exhibit 17 - Positions charged against operation E. Application criteria for tenants F . Model Form Lease G. Policy Statement regarding Religious Activities H. Exhibit 19 - Management and Maintenance Services 3 . Funding Awards and Uses of Funds A. Explanation of Sources and uses . B . City of Bellevue Block Grant award of $27 , 000 for purchase of 113th Street Site, located in unincorporated King County. C . City of Renton General Fund award of S19 , 924 for the 19th Street Site . D. City of Renton 1988 Block Grant award of $30 , 617 for the 19th Street Site . E. City of Renton 1989 Block Grant award of $J 4 , 644 and uses . 4 . Surveyor ' s Report up-dated on both sites . 5 . Architectural Resume and new owner/architect contract . 6 . Contractor ' s Cost Breakdown with breakdown of off-site work and general requirements . 7 . Contractor ' s Resume . • 8 . Pages modifying Drawing C-1 and C-2 . .. y 50640 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION ilie n e La vi 3 le ,being first duly sworn on oath states that he/she is the Chief Clerk of the VALLEY DAILY NEWS • Kent Edition • Renton Edition • Auburn Edition Daily newspapers published six(6) times a week.That said newspapers are legal newspapers and are now and have been for more than six months prior to the date of publication referred to,printed and published in the English language continually as daily newspapers in Kent, King County,Washington.The Valley Daily News has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for King County. The notice in the exact form attached,was published in the Kent Edition , Renton Edition x x , Auburn Edition , (and not in • supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers during the below stated period.The annexed notice a Ordinance 41,4212 was published on April 28, 1999 R 9-'!91 • 7 f1 , The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the 1 sum of $ 76 ,80 . / , Subscribed and sworn to before me this 1.p day of may 19 89 r ' Not y Public for the State of Washington, residing at Federal Way, • King County, Washington. VDN#87 Revised 11/86 • CITY OF RE".TON WASHING101ti ORDINANC:F NO. 4212 AN ORDINANCE OF 1HE CITY OF REN- TON, WASHINGTON•CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF CERTAIN PROPERTIES WITHIN THE CITY OF REN- TON FROM R-1 (Single-Family Residential) TO G-1 (General Use)(GOOD SHEPHERD OF WASHINGTON — R-010-88). WHEREAS, under Chapter 7, Title IV (Building Regulations) of Ordinance No. 1628 known as the "Code of General Ordi- nances of the City of Renton," as amend- ed, and the maps and reports adopted in conjunction therewith, the property herein- below described has heretofore been zoned as R-1 (Single-Family Residential); and WHEREAS, a proper petition for change of zone classification of said property has been filed with the Community Develop- ment Department on or about February 24, 1988, with ne,.iion was duly referred to the Hearing Examir,3r for investigation, study, and public hearing, and a Public Hearing having been held thereon on or about June 28, 1988, and continued to July 5, 1988, and said matter having been duly consid- ered by the Hearing Examiner, and said zoning request having been granted with conditions, and the matter having been appealed to the City Council of the City of Renton, and said City Council having reversed Condition No. 4 to the Hearing Examiner's Decision and said zoning request being in conformity with the City's Comprehensive Plan, as amended,and the City Council having duly considered all matters relevant thereto, and all parties having been heard appearing in support thereof or in opposition thereto; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUN- CIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASH- INGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I: The following described property in the City of Renton is hereby rezoned to G-1 (General Use) as hereinbe- low specified, subject to the condition established by the City Council at its Octo- ber 3, 1988, meeting; and the Planning Manager is hereby authorized and directed to change the maps of the Zoning Ordi- nance, as amended, to evidence said rezoning, to-wit: See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof as if fully set font, herein. (Said property — approximately 0.85 acres— being located on the south side.of N.E. 19th Street at the 3900 block, between Union Avenue and Shelton Ave- nue N.E.) SECTION II: This Ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval, end five days after its publication. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this 24th day of April, 1989. Maxine E. Motor, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this 24th day of April, 1989. Earl Clymer, Mayor Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Date of Publication: April 28, 1989 • Account #50640 ORDINANCE NO. 4212 Exhibit "A" That portion of the southeast quarter of the northeast quarter of the southeast quarlOr of Section 4, Township 23 North, Range-5 East, W.M., in King County, Washingtbjl, described as follows: Commencing at the northeast corner'bf said subdivision; thence north 88°14'3'§" west along the north line thereof 30.033 feet; thence south 0°58'58" west parasl with the east line of said subdivision 30.003 feet; thence north 88°14'32"west 125 feet to the true point of beginning; thence con- tinuing north 88°14'32" west 225 feet; thence south 0°58'58" west 170 feet; thence south 88°14'32" east 20 feat; thence north 0°58'58"east 10 feet; thence south 88°14'32" east 205 feet; then;e. north 0°58'58" east 160 feet to the true point of beginning. (ALSO KNOWN AS Lot 2 of city of Renton Lot Line Adjustment Number 004-84, recorded under Recording Number 8405179C01). Published in the Valley Daily News April 28, 1989. R3481 Department of Assessments ATTENTION: Abstract Section' - Al Martin 709F King County Administration Building OF R.4,, Seattle, Washington 98104 OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK � O PUBLIC RECORDS DIVISION C �% ® n The attached material comes to you in response to your recent request. 09gT60 SEPTE Ordinance No. 4212 May 1, 1989 CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVENUE SOUTH RENTON, WA 98055 PHONE (206) 235-2500 Maxine E. Motor, City Clerk • • 4' • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • / V/ a 1 CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. 4212 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF CERTAIN PROPERTIES WITHIN THE CITY OF RENTON FROM R-1 (Single-Family Residential) TO G-1 (General Use) (GOOD SHEPHERD OF WASHINGTON - R-010-88) . WHEREAS, under Chapter 7 , Title IV (Building Regulations) of Ordinance No. 1628 known as the "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, " as amended, and the maps and reports adopted in conjunction therewith, the property hereinbelow described has heretofore been zoned as R-1 (Single-Family Residential) ; and WHEREAS, a proper petition for change of zone classification of said property has been filed with the Community Development Department on or about February 24, ' 1988, which petition was duly referred to the Hearing Examiner for investigation, study, and public hearing, and a Public Hearing having been held thereon on or about June 28, 1988, and continued to July 5, 1988, and said matter having been duly considered by the Hearing Examiner, and said zoning request having been granted with conditions, and the matter having been appealed to the City Council of the City of. Renton, and said City Council having reversed Condition No. 4 to the Hearing Examiner's Decision and said zoning request being in conformity with the City's Comprehensive Plan, as amended, and the City Council having duly considered all matters relevant thereto, and all parties having been heard appearing in support thereof or in opposition thereto; 1 r r ' 1 _, ORDINANCE NO. 4212 \ e NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I : The following described property in the City of Renton is hereby rezoned to G-1 (General Use) as hereinbelow specified, subject to the condition established by the City Council at its October 3, 1988, meeting; and the Planning Manager is hereby authorized and directed to change the maps of the Zoning Ordinance, as amended, to evidence said rezoning, to-wit: See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof as if fully set forth herein. (Said property - approximately 0. 85 acres - being located on the south side of N.E. 19th Street at the 3900 block, between Union Avenue and Shelton Avenue N.E. ) SECTION II : This Ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval, and five days after its publication. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this 24th day of April , 1989. • >2 ,,__,...___,_,.. e .) -2,0-tev-i Maxine E. Motor, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this 24th day of April , 1989. VEar Clymer, M r Approv as to form: Q1-nw Lawrence J. War en, City Attorney Date of Publication: April 28, 1989 ORD. 65 : 10-10-88-as. 2 , ORDINANCE NO. 4212 Exhibit "A" 1 That portion of the southeast quarter of the northeast quarter of the southeast quarter of Section 4, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M. , in King County, Washington, described as follows: Commencing at the northeast cotner of said subdivision; thence north 88°14' 32" west along the north line thereof 30.003 feet; thence south 0°5,3' 58", west parallel with the east line of said subdivision 30.003 feet; ' thence north 88°14'32" west 125 feet to the true point of beginn!.n4; thence continuing north 88°14' 32" west 225 feet; thence south 0°58'58" west 170 feet; thence south 88'14'32" east 20 feet; thence north 0°58'S8" east 10 feet; thence south 88°14' 32" east 205 feet; thence north 0°58' 58" east 160 feet to the true point of beginning; (ALSO KNOWN AS Lot 2 of city of Renton Lot Line Adjustment Humber 004-84, recorded under Recording Number 8405179C01) . •4.- 1•ko••.•:;;, T•,, .?-. 5, 3S i :: ..<'?) . ..t-; ., . • TN.. .-T - y,� • • -•_ r; ' Y� `_' ORDINANCE NO. 4212 —r , • ' • 1 / . , _ .r • �• \ :, .. •4 •2 -3 _ 5 • -c./1o41H: sT: ' ir-- •� • SCALE I"— 100' Tasr'ea.i .4.s Zs - 1306.0 — ,ea • •.oe.a° - �' / KCSP 184052 14. 8501020301 v I . �$0 ? _ tor i al coT'Z' W taT'3" y eH eo r !,! Ra • N y,,o I' — a Zo k. goo° I.ii.t ,e0�'r ' y • x� s�ve e • ��33 'a 326 12' .• (0) i N L�a5.27 dt.vornr/7 ` 3 r,757 3 ioo ' .ep _ . Wi4Z one t N�p ''' 2 I N •,1 r9 i^7 y • I e re / ♦A' e e > • 7 3 rbgO • h •- it:),p Z 2,y. r Z— - id 0070 I^G 14 Ti! a 2Ae• ^ M Z �73dfs I I i•OW I.1 u vr lit 217.5 4eN70N 0043 4070 ••"- Rot. T Li-Joe r--1 405.91 e'cp. r1 50�� s 4/ - — 1 4 *bao 9 I� ,Ps.vriy oR0 ;4)z ts,pc. onO+ 6:. 09 $ 0 a44.a - a a= O R 1'e1 e 1 a k : . La loo op� e S�✓t�4 c ti 5 �3 o JAI— � coro 2 e _. /sdA2 -I a I. 9°..M'• Z .re PB ,-a V o 4 ` , O� I e 10 t? 4e t M1 azeees- ITV • `0 I °ley1 V A 1, . A at,ww,ia,aw. �� t .go 4e 4.p 2 , �- n W (II36 e1 yf7 ! A° p ink ¢ .i3 fS N. E. 191 ,5T a I. - ° /cJ.f8 fu f/Y�Nd/•>R9a•Es/. . -2-.t9;' </Jo 7102>., al 1. 2/-0S6 s:e9-si-o7ir`-.*o.O.sc .•w.a7•S1E. 106T11- ST. '� (y 7r 1 /e✓r .15 .•'I N 'i „A 25 2 On 14a`b5 0 • Z` yP 1 n O• S y as Iv ,1 p./0 i �, iy a-sir pL. N..r4.12/Y , 7v� Al Zw 24.;z. -R 10�� thy' w'O IF rn J („Y ".v dw./4.31..• '7 �` —�: rze ese .� rin L� w �/ Y�a�•.••N. O 1 024.r72 V \ \ j_ _ i �Q .. t Z /i . �O'a?/ a .v 9,1475,......p VI. • 24 oeq , �, oo�o o O��• �y' itel ee 7` �/210 0:: VI.. -j %;4 Es- C y v /7 ?go......a.aar.1 t q etg.,o • 10 r0'1 2 /eu eze tad•a gays, ` fi�tl0 4 c . hr 4. 1��/S��.f/,It 4 /9 ief 4a`N"20 $M 0A a t1�A, '� Z�r •1�F N• W 0 ') A •t V h �Ir �. a c >,i k• — IL /eas. ` Ij woe...ro: 2 SE. 107TH.•/ ; Sit . E I .4%0 5 7sR>. /7.r'07 .vs.ar.osn•aa4 afi l 27 " 1 y.. 77 N es.a1r•s2.v 4M.na ` 1� v a:..o►.,2r. • 0130 a so 03` Ma 764 Y �V 9/qe. pL. V 1016 " ` 1 2.5 LB " ow " 4 ‘a ti 0 . 0 woo/a•r:w. G tfi b ,, /Da.44in t. •o,it 29150 N{ 0 0 GOOD SHEPHERD OF WASHINGTON Q I 72• 3/ a/vr.n de.,I07o y /.t se. ' 'I 5 Lai*O.•.f MM y ao REZONE F ,n M F A•we•op•ic,/ I - -3 0 1309.24 -E R-010-88 cv /��E a�N LM 4.RAtr ' ,r9.w. 2300 77 `._ 1- r_ ----s 01 Ir , h \ tql b'.:-,i) 'et ‘i 0- ' �. V \ 2 1 3 a° ,�,L 1 \. r ——___ nccoca . i _ 1u ,:.1 I oaf R-010-88 CITY OF RENTON APR131989 RECEIVED CITY CLERK'S OFFICE o N) cn N) RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS RE: Re-zone R-010-88 N.E. 19th Street Group Home, Good Shepherd of Washington. 1. Good Shepherd of Washington agrees that the property shall be used for a group home for not more than six developmentally disabled adults . 2. Good Shepherd of Washington agrees that in all other respects the use limitations on the property shall be those of the R-1 zoning code. 3. Good Shepherd of Washington agrees that the failure to develop the property according to the terms of the Conditional Use Permit within one year, or to otherwise abandon the specific Conditional Use Permit or discontinue this group home for any reason, shall cause the property to revert to its prior R-1 zoning classification. Dated L ie // ,1989 GOOD SHEPHERD OF WASHINGTON a State of Washington orporation ByLIA,,,A.,0? g Edward R. Stanle , Preside t By Ole. Darlene R. Lang, Se etary FILED FOR RECORD AT REQUEST OF OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK RENTON MUNICIPAL BLDG. 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WA 98055 A2,STRICTIVE COVENANTS -Good Sher.._rd of Washington Rezone R-010-88 CO CD • • N N.) O • • • i That portion of the southeast quarter of the northeast quarter of the southeast quarter of Section 4, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M. , in King County. Washington, described ma follows: Commencing at the northeast cotner of said subdivision; thence north 88°14' 32" west along the north line thereof 30.003 feet; thence south 05p' 58", west parallel with the east line of said subdivision 30.003 feet; ' thence north 88°14' 32" west 125 feet to the true point of beginn.'.ng; thence continuing north 88°14' 32" west 225 feet; thence south 0°58' 58" west 170 feet; thence mouth 88°14' 32" east 20 feet; thence north 0°58' 58" east 10 feet; thence south 88°14' 32" east 205 feet; thence north 0°58' 58" east 160 feet to the true point of beginning; (ALSO KNOWN AS Lot 2 of city of Renton Lot Line Adjustment Number . 004-84, recorded under Recording Number 8405179C01 ) . l , CITY OF RENTON ..1 FINANCE DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor Maxine E. Motor, City Clerk April 28 , 1989 Good. Shepherd of Washington 18940 Marine View Drive SW Seattle, Washington 98166 Re: Good Shepherd of Washington-Rezone-R-010-88 Dear Sir or Madam: The Renton City Council, at its abbreviated meeting of April 24, 1989, adopted Ordinance No. 4212 changing the zoning classification of certain properties within the City of Renton from R-1 to G-1. A copy of the ordinance and restrictive covenants recorded under King County Auditor' s file number 8904260262 are attached for your records. If we can be of further assistance in this matter, please feel free to call. Yours truly, CITY OF RENTON e Maxine E. Motor, CMC City Clerk cc: Darlene Lang Ralph Evans Mary Lou Harbeck Howard R. Kienle Planning Division-Current Hearing Examiner Enclosure 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2501 RENTON CITY COUNCIL Abbreviated Meeting April 24, 1989 Municipal Building Monday, 7:40 p.m. Council Chambers MINUTES CALL TO ORDER Mayor Earl Clymer led the Pledge of Allegiance to the flag and called the meeting of the Renton City Council to order. ROLL CALL OF RICHARD M. STREDICKE, Council President; KATHY A. KEOLKER- COUNCIL MEMBERS WHEELER, TONI NELSON, NANCY L. MATHEWS, JOHN REED AND THOMAS W. TRIMM. MOVED BY TRIMM, SECONDED BY MATHEWS, COUNCIL EXCUSE ABSENT COUNCILMAN ROBERT J. HUGHES. CARRIED. CITY STAFF IN EARL CLYMER, Mayor; LAWRENCE J. WARREN, City Attorney; ATTENDANCE MICHAEL W. PARNESS, Administrative Assistant; MAXINE E. MOTOR, City Clerk; LYNN GUTTMANN, Public Works Director; JOHN E. WEBLEY, Parks Director; LT. DALE BAKER, Police Department. PRESS Kathy Bunnell Johnson, Valley Daily News APPROVAL OF Correction made on page 104, paragraph 5, line 11 to change interest rate COUNCIL MINUTES from 6.85% to 7.5016%. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY REED, COUNCIL APPROVE THE COUNCIL MINUTES OF APRIL 17, 1989, AS CORRECTED. CARRIED. CONSENT AGENDA Items on the consent agenda are adopted by one motion which follows the listing. Public Works: Public Works Department requested review of enforcement procedures for Underground Utilities underground ordinance to hire mediator at an approximate cost of $6,000 to Ordinance Enforcement approach TCI and other utility companies to negotiate equitable cost sharing Procedures of utility trenching. Refer to Utilities Committee. Public Works Soos Creek Public Works Department requested interim interlocal service agreement with Water/Sewer District Soos Creek Water/Sewer District to provide service to property located within Interim Service to S. 55th the City limits on S. 55th Street between 99th Place South and Talbot Road Street South currently experiencing low water pressure. Refer to Utilities Committee. Public Works: Public Works Department requested increase in scope of Comprehensive Comprehensive Sewer and Sewer and Water Plans over five year period or as determined by Council to Water Plan Scope improve levels of service, expand sewer system computer model to include all Expansion collection system pipelines and lift stations, and develop detailed responses to issues raised by Council regarding implementation of mandatory sewer connection ordinance; and requested authorization for consultant services for interim utility engineering services. Refer to Utilities Committee. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY REED, COUNCIL APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA. CARRIED. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS Ways and Means Ways and Means Committee Chairman Trimm presented the following Committee ordinances for second and final reading: Ordinance #4212 An ordinance was read changing the zoning classification of property located Rezone: Good Shepherd on the south side of NE 19th Street at the 3900 block between Union Avenue Group Home (NE 19th and Shelton Avenue NE from R-1, single family residential, to G-1, general, Street), R-010-88 zone for Good Shepherd of Washington, File No. R-010-88. MOVED BY TRIMM, SECONDED BY REED, COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: 5 AYES: KEOLKER-WHEELER, NELSON, MATHEWS, REED, TRIMM. 1 NAY: STREDICKE. CARRIED. Council President Stredicke opposed the rezone due to disparity in lot size of G-1 zone (35,000 square feet) and the surrounding R-1 zoned area (7,200 square feet). WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE COMMITTEE REPORT APRIL 24, 1989 ORDINANCES The Ways and Means Committee recommends the following ordinances for second and final reading: Good Shepherd Group Home Rezone, R-015-88, approximately 0. 85 acres from R-1to G-1 (located on the south side of NE 19th St. at the 3900 block, between Union Avenue and Shelton Avenue NE) Amending City Code Relating to Utility Discounts for Renters that are Low-Income Senior Citizens or are Disabled Amending Garbage Disposal Rates The Ways and Means Committee recommends the following ordinance for first reading: Fetterly Annexation - approximately 5.51 acres located in the vicinity of SE 116th St 142nd Ave SE APPROVAL OF VOUCHERS The Ways and Means Committee recommends approval of Vouchers No. 60013 through No. 60351 in the amount of $758,225. 61; having received departmental certification that merchandise/services have been received or rendered; Vouchers No. 60020 through No. 60022 machine voided. �i��nvrN� Thomas Trimm, Chairman d&6 VV Kath eolker-Wheeler, Vice- Chair Richard M. Stredicke, Acting Member R-010-88 CITY OF RENTON APR 13 .1989 RECEIVED CITY CLERK'S OFFICE RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS RE: Re-zone R-010-88 N.E. 19th Street Group Home, Good Shepherd of Washington. 1. Good Shepherd of Washington agrees that the property COD shall be used for a group home for not more than six developmentally disabled adults. O2. Good Shepherd of Washington agrees that in all other CI respects the use limitations on the property shall (jj be those of the R-1 zoning code. 3 . Good Shepherd of Washington agrees that the failure to develop the property according to the terms of the Conditional Use Permit. within one year, or to otherwise abandon the specific Conditional Use Permit or discontinue this group home for any reason, shall cause the property to revert to its prior R-1 zoning classification. 89/04'26 #0262 1A Dated Z?,. // , 1989 RECD F 6.00 CASHSL ****6.00 50 GOOD SHEPHERD OF WASHINGTON . a State of Washington orporation By e Edward R. Stanle , Preside t Bydd.dite. I / Darlene R. Lang, Se etary Fr1 • ? eta r ;•V% th cAD FILED FOR RECORD AT REQUEST OF - °sl OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK 4,3 RENTON MUNICIPAL BLDG. ,11 cab 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WA 98055 . - .tESTRICTIVE COVENANTS -Good Sh_,_2rd of Washington Rezone R-010-88 CD • O to tr G`2 O • cn u • i That portion of the southeast quarter of the northeast quarter of the southeast quarter ofs Sectiodescribedn follow*: Township North, Range 5 East, H.M. , in Ktng County, Commencing at the northeast corner of said subdivision; thence north 88°14' 32" west along the north line thereof 30.003 feet; thence south 0°51'' 58", west parallel with the east line of said subdivision 30.003 feet; • thence north 88°14' 32" west 125 feet to the true point of beginning; thence continuing north 88°14' 32" west 225 feet; thence south 0°58' 58" west 170 feet; thence south 88°14' 32" east 20 feet; , thence north 0°58' 58" east 10 feet; thence south 88°14' 32" east 2( 5 feet; thence north 0°58' 58" east 160 feet to the true point of beginning; (ALSO KNOWN AS Lot 2 of city of Renton Lot Line Adjustment Number . 004-84, recorded under Recording Number 8405179C01 ) . April 17, 1989 Renton City Council Minutes - Page 109 CAG: 89-021, Rainier Utilities Committee Chairman Keolker-Wheeler discussed the concept of a Disposal Collection half-can rate as an incentive for consumers who reduce the amount of their Contract household waste. Since a standard half-can container with lid is not currently stocked by retail stores, Council members discussed whether a half- can should be available at cost through the contractor, provided by the City, or stocked by retail stores, i.e. McLendon's, Ernst, Pay 'n Pak, for sale to the public. Following discussion regarding the three alternatives, it was determined that staff should review options with the contractor to determine whether he would provide the container for a charge or whether the City should notify the private sector of the required specifications of the half-can for retail sale. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY MATHEWS, COUNCIL REFER THIS MATTER TO THE ADMINISTRATION FOR REPORT BACK. CARRIED. Community Services Community Services Committee Chairman Nelson presented a report Committee recommending Council concurrence in the request of the Renton Centennial Community Event: Committee to name the entrance road into Cedar River Park "Centennial Renton Centennial Way." The roadway "Centennial Way" will commemorate the Washington State Celebration, Centennial Centennial Celebration and provide a lasting value in our community. This Way Named event will be in conjunction with the Centennial tree plantings. MOVED BY NELSON, SECONDED BY STREDICKE, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Community Event: Community Services Committee Chairman Nelson presented a report Renton River Days recommending Council concurrence in the request to waive all permit fees for activities endorsed by the Renton River Days Committee. The Committee further recommended concurrence to locate the ornamental River Days windsocks and banners on city light poles for approximately one month, July 8-August 13. MOVED BY NELSON, SECONDED BY KEOLKER- WHEELER, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS Ways and Means .Ways and Means Committee Chairman Trimm presented the following Committee ordinances for first reading: Rezone: Good Shepherd An ordinance was read changing the zoning classification of property located Group Home (NE 19th on the south side of NE 19th Street at the 3900 block between Union Avenue Street), R-010-88 and Shelton Avenue NE from R-1, single family residential, to G-1, general, zone for Good Shepherd of Washington, File No. R-010-88. MOVED BY TRIMM, SECONDED BY REED, COUNCIL REFER THIS ORDINANCE BACK TO COMMITTEE FOR ONE WEEK. CARRIED. Utility: Billing Discounts An ordinance was read amending Chapter 3, Garbage, Chapter 7, Sewers, for Renters Chapter 13, Storm and Surface Water Drainage, and Chapter 14, Water, of Title VIII (Health and Sanitation) of City Code relating to utility discounts for senior citizens or those who are disabled, and adding renters to the eligible category of rate payers for the discount. MOVED BY TRIMM, SECONDED BY STREDICKE, COUNCIL REFER THIS ORDINANCE BACK TO COMMITTEE FOR ONE WEEK. CARRIED. Finance: Solid Waste Rate An ordinance was read amending Chapter 3 of Title VIII (Health and Study (Rainier Disposal, Sanitation) of Ordinance No. 1628 relating to garbage disposal service and CAG-021-89) rates. MOVED BY TRIMM, SECONDED BY STREDICKE, COUNCIL REFER THIS ORDINANCE BACK TO COMMITTEE FOR ONE WEEK. CARRIED. Ways and Means Committee Chairman Trimm presented the following resolutions for reading and adoption: Resolution #2757 A resolution was read authorizing certain individuals to request wire transfer Finance: Wire Transfer of of funds for purposes of investing idle cash in qualified public depositories. Funds MOVED BY TRIMM, SECONDED BY STREDICKE, COUNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED. Resolution #2758 A resolution was read authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to execute a CAG: 89-018, Security lease agreement with Security Pacific National Bank for financing for new Pacific National Bank, telephone system. MOVED BY TRIMM, SECONDED BY STREDICKE, Telephone System COUNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED. Financing . WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE COMMITTEE REPORT APRIL 17, 1989 ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS The Ways and Means Committee recommends the following ordinance for second and final reading: Water and Sewer Revenue Bonds The Ways and Means Committee recommends the following ordinances for first reading: Good Shepherd Group Home Rezone, R-015-88, approximately 0.85 acres from R-1 to G-1 (located on the south side of NE 19th St. at the 3900 block, between Union Avenue and Shelton Avenue NE) Amending City Code Relating to Utility Discounts for Renters that are Low-Income Senior Citizens or are Disabled Amending Garbage Disposal Rates The Ways and Means Committee recommends the following resolutions for reading and adoption: Authorizing Certain Individuals to Request Wire Transfer of Funds , Authorizing Mayor and City Clerk to Execute Lease with Security Pacific for New Telephone System CONSULTANT AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL MANAGEMENT SERVICES (Referred 4/17/89) The Ways and Means Committee recommends concurrence in the recommendation of the Administration to authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to sign the agreement with Heery Program Management, Inc. , to provide services for Phase I project management services. //1.2L(..a,// d' Thomas Trimm, Chairman /6441 - 01\-Cd2-e Ka by olker-Wheeler, Vice- Chair a / 14#717.‹V /4* )17I6912((.1 - Richard M. Stredicke, Acting Member ;14. CITY OF RENTON FINANCE DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor Maxine E. Motor, City Clerk January 16, 1989 • `I Mrs. Darlene Lang /�v �� Good Shepherd of Washington r6g1/1A)h-i-Atei-e---'" ) / /4751 South 172nd Seattle, WA 98188 Re: Appeal of Rezone R-010-88 NE 19th Group Home, Good Shepherd of Washington Dear Mrs. Lang: Please refer to my letter of November 21, 1988, as follows: The Zoning Division and the Building Division have concurred in your request that the $1,000 bond required by the City Council on October 3, 1988 as a condition of the above-captioned rezone, will become a condition of the building permit. "At the regular meeting of October 3, the Renton City Council also concurred in the recommendation of the Hearing Examiner and required restrictive covenants be signed as follows: 1. That the property shall be used for a group home for not more than six developmentally disabled adults. 2. In all other respects the use limitations on the property shall be those of the R-1 zoning code. 3. The failure to develop the property according to the terms of the Conditional Use Permit within one year, or to otherwise abandon the specific Conditional Use Permit or discontinue this group home for any reason, shall cause the property to revert to its prior R-1 zoning classification. "Please file the covenants with this office. Upon receipt of the restrictive covenants and city approval, the ordinance approving the rezone will be adopted. "If you have further questions, please do not hesitate to contact this office." To date the restrictive covenants have not been received. The adoption of the ordinance is pending receipt of the covenants. Please advise status of the covenants. -- I Yours truly, CITY OF RENTON • - ��/ ( %• Maxine E. Motor, CMC � � �r City Clerk cc: Building Director �`t' l; Zoning Administrator City Attorney , f Q(.(�/ `! 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2501 . - REN', CITY COUNCIL MEETING - �' ' December 5th, 1988 . . - ;.:. Ralph• Evans, 3306 NE 11th Place, Renton, 98056 - Mr. -Mayor, . Council Members. -. Speaking._as a Renton. citizen and taxpayer, and not necessarily as a member of . ..' theyNeighbors'-;For=;=R-1 -Preservation.- I - wish to express my concern about: one . L. or-tion of the ro- osed -1989 Bud g ei ':Lido not a ree with the os.ition- of.. the p_........ ..-_ P P _ g . . g .. Housing &:Communi ty . Development Department. .that- another $17, 500- or $29,.000 , =`'sho i l d:.be: • -allocated to: the Good _Shepherd of Washington for. .the development of • ._,.theLr:': group"homes,, when the work for which $72, 500 was allocated in the 1988 ` :,budget.- hasn' t. even been started." . - . "' Back in' 1987 when the proposed 1988 budget was presented, funding was requested by the Parks Department for two group homes by the Good Shepherd of Washington. The two proposed homes were identified at that time as - Site #1 . . . . NE 1Oth & Olympia, and Site #2. . . . NE 19th between Shelton & Union. .The funding was requested for on . & off site , improvements & was specified as ; ' Site #1 , City of Renton Block Grant Funds - $21 , 947 Site #2, City of Renton Block Grant Funds $30, 617 Site #2, City of Renton General Funds $19. 924 $50. 541 $50, 541 $72. 488 During _discussions on the proposed budget, and on several occasions since, we, the public, were advised that should either of the Good Shepherd . homes not be built. the Block Grant money would be diverted to the Renton Museum fund. Mistakenly perhaps, I felt that a deadline was implied. 1 felt that if the money wasn' t used in 1988, it would revert to the Museum fund and that a new appropriation for the homes would be submitted in 1989. Having this impression, I did not oppose the adoption of the 1988 budget. It appears now however, that these appropriations have no deadline and are good until used. , . This tends to be confirmed by the 1989 Preliminary Budget document, which on page 47 in the 3rd paragraph, the last sentence says "The block grants are continuing appropriations, carried forward from year to year until expended" . On October 3rd, 1988 Mr. John Morris presented the proposed 1989 Housing & Human Resources Block Grant Program. On page 7 of that document he listed the 1988 block grant appropriations for the Good 'Shepherd homes as shown above. He ' then proceeded to list conditions which City Staff & the ERC had imposed on the two - sites, and concluded with a request for an additional $17, 519 for the Good Shepherd -homes. On top of that amount, he recommended that another $11, 770 be allocated if the potential final adjusted pass-thru amount of $14, 074 was realized. This would amount to a total 1989 appropriation of $29, 289 for the • Good Shepherd group homes. The justification was that these additional . conditions would result in costs which could not have been anticipated. • I ask you to consider that the conditions imposed on the Olympia Ave site by the City Staff & the ERC are presently under appeal , and some or all could conceivably be deleted. The justification for more funds for the 19th Street site included an up front cost of $31, 002 for a sprinkler system which has 'since been replaced by a $1 , 000 bond. You are being asked to approve an appropriation in the amount of $29, 289, without being offered an accurate statement of need, while many of the other local programs can easily demonstrate an urgent and immediate need. In talking with Ms. Teresa Pineda of • • the King County Planning Community Development Div. ,on on Friday, December 2nd, - 1988 I was 'told that the county now has allocated that additional • On November 14, 1988 during the Committee of the Whole Budget Hearings,-: . • :'- Mr Morris stated, .in part, that ' block grant funds are not allocated --specific site. Ms.. Pineda however, stated that the -King-County allocation -- showed $15, 000 for site #1, and $14, 289 for site #2. If Mr. Morris is correct, - my -interpretation would be that should any Good Shepherd home be built, all ' of the funds appropriated over the years could be used on that site. . For :example, i f - f or,• some reason the home proposed for NE ' 10th & Olympia .were not to -.".be;-bui l t, ' the' home. .proposed for NE 19th would be funded_ to the tune of some $101 ; 000: And `$15; 000 of the . $29, 289 - f rom- the 1989 budget :would: have• been app.ropriated_,to- cover conditions at the Olympia site which .had, no equivalents _. °application-' at the 19th Street site whatsoever. How then can any of the money -- .ever.- be be used in support of the Renton Museum? I feel that if- this is really the : case, the. public has been misled. Again however, I guess I have a problem with . = a request for additional money, when the work funded in the 1988 budget hasn' t been started. I also have difficulty understanding why, of the additional funds described as Potential Final Adjusted Passthrough funds in the amount of $14, 074, $11 , 770 is ' to be allocated to the Good Shepherd. That amounts to 83. 63% of the total . According to Mr. Morris' . 1989 .Housing and Human Resources Block Grant - Program outline, there are many other very deserving programs looking for • funding under the block grant program. Yet from the additional potential funds, he proposes 83. 63% for the Good Shepherd, 10. 39% king County Rape Relief , and nothing whatsoever for Renton Area Youth Services, Domestic Abuse Women' s Network. Friends of Youth, South K. C. Sexual Assault Center. or the Renton Community Health Services. The remaining 5. 98% is allocated to Planning and Administration. I would hope the disbursement plans can still be revised by the City so as to provide for more of those in need. According to Ms. Pineda however. the Renton City Council passed a resolution on October 3rd, 1988 specifying how the funds would be applied. If that is the case I must question the priorities of the Council . I would also question the usefulness of a Public Hearing relative to the Block Grant Program at this time, if the decisions were final last October. • In the Seattle Sunday Times of November 27th, 1988 in the legal notices there appeared a Public Notice of the availability of the Final Statement of 1989 King County Community Development Block Grant Program. The notice reflected changes that had been made since the the Proposed Statement of October 23rd. Under a column headed "Activities Previously Proposed. Now Increased to: " the first entry• is • "Group Homes 'Construction (SE King County) • $45, 500. " The telephone call to Ms. Pineda of the King County Planning and Community Development Division confirmed that this was the Good Shepherd. She said that there were _ two homes involved, and the funding is to cover site improvements. I have several questions that relate to all of these requests for funding. 1 ) . How is Block Grant or General Fund money presented to a recipient? a) Incrementally as required for various specific sub-projects, or, b) A one-time, lump sum payment. 2) . Is any form of accounting to the city required by the city? Does the city have an interest in how the money is spent or just in the disbursement of the pass-thru funds? 3) . I described in my letter to the Council on November 8th how the Good Shepherd plans included 4 group homes. Two of these were to be built within the city and two were to be built in the county, just south of the city. If the funds are distributed in lump sum payments, a, the city doesn' t require r •type of accounting, and the funds aren' t allocated to a specific site, who' s to say that the Renton Block Grant funds won' t be. used for the county' homes? And should this be of any concern? I feel_ that there are a number ofpoints here._ that might',-wel l . be of significant interest Ito the general public. Of the Renton funds--alone- we are talking of roughly $52, 500 in block grant funds plus some $19, 900 in City of_ .- Renton General Funds for 1988. Then, before that money has even. been tapped, " the Good Shepherd are back asking for yet another $29, 000 without specifying how, :__or even -where,, the money is to be used I: feel that the Good' Shepherd - request; for. 1989 funds should. be denied until 'Ilthe ' 1988 money has been expended . ,; and -accounted for'.:. -I think` further ' that :the"'$29, 289,.presently:'de`s i gnated, for . ,f <the -Good .Shepherd in the'`: 1989, budget ;should :be ,re-distributed to some: or-: all of - the other programs in the, budget proposal _ • Thank You. - .. a December 12. 1988 Renton City Council Min ./1 —O/D -�'age 353 p Ordinance #4193 An ordinance was read establishing and adopting equipment rental rates. Finance: 1989 Equipment MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY MATHEWS, COUNCIL.ADOPT Rental Rates THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. Ordinance #4194 An ordinance was read amending water and sewer charges, and amending the Finance: 1989 Utility income level to qualify for certain senior citizen and/or disability rates for Rates water, sewer, garbage, and storm drainage, based on the current percentage increase in social security benefits. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY MATHEWS, COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. aj Ways and Means Committee Chairman Stredicke presented the following ordinances for first reading:, Annexation: Hudson An ordinance was read annexing property located in the vicinity of 132nd Avenue SE/Union Avenue NE and NE'25th Place to the City of Renton; Hudson; A-002-88. MOVED BY STREDICKE; SECONDED BY MATHEWS, COUNCIL REFER THIS ORDINANCE BACK TO COMMITTEE FOR ONE WEEK. CARRIED. Rezone: Hudson An ordinance was read establishing the zoning classification for the Hudson Annexation annexation property to R-1, single family residential;property located in the vicinity of 132nd Avenue SE/Union Avenue NE and NE 25th Place;A-002- 88. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY MATHEWS, COUNCIL REFER THIS ORDINANCE BACK TO COMMITTEE FOR ONE'WEEK. CARRIED. Finance: Risk Ways and Means Committee Chairman Stredicke presented a report Management Program recommending approval of the policy and procedure for risk management to Policy & Procedure clarify who has what role in the program and to establish a method for -.,,A Council review of coverage levels and internal charge-back rates. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY MATHEWS, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT: CARRIED. 'a Vouchers Ways and Means Committee Chairman Stredicke presented a report :. recommending approval of Vouchers 56845 through 57264 in the amount of $1,402,653.24, having received departmental certification that merchandise/services have been received or rendered; Vouchers 56856 through 56856 machine voided. MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, COUNCIL ADOPT THE VOUCHERS AS PRESENTED. CARRIED. Rezone: Good Shepherd Added: Letter was read from Darlene Lang, Secretary for Good Shepherd of Group Home (NE 19th Washington, 4751 South 172nd Place, Seattle, withdrawing the request made Street), R-010-88, 1989 on 11/7/88 for inclusion of $10,788 in the 1989 social'services budget to H&HR Funding Request cover cost of watermain"and hydrant at the group home site'at NE 19th and Shelton. Councilwoman Mathews clarified that the referenced request from Good Shepherd for social service funding was determined to be inappropriate 4. since utility funding is required. She stated that the matter was disposed of by adoption of Utilities Committee report on 12/5/88 concurring in the recommendation of the Public Works Department that the City would install ' the watermain;-and the City would accept $6,798 from Good Shepherd for their share of the installation cost. M VED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY MATHEWS, COUNCIL PRESENT PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE REPORTS. CARRIED. Councilwoman Mathews requested that letters r regarding Good Shepherd group home proposals on 10th and Olympia from '' Ralph Evans, dated 12/12/88, and Bethlehem Lutheran Church, dated 12/7/88, be referred to the official rezone file, R-015-88. :z Planning and Planning and Development Committee majority report was presented by Development Committee members Stredicke and Reed indicating that the Planning and Development (Majority Report) Committee met on December 8, 1988, to consider the appeal on the Good Appeal: Good Shepherd Shepherd group home. It was noted that'the Hearing Examiner had required Group Home Rezone the applicant to reconfigure the lots for the short plat, and that there was not (Olympia Avenue NE), an existing site plan for the reconfigured short plat. In response to the R-015-88 Hearing Examiner's conditions, the applicant indicated that it was prepared to submit a modified short plat application. The staff had not had time,to prepare comments to the modified short plat, but believed that it had comments which would satisfy both the Hearing Examiner's and environmental concerns. a,. It was therefore recommended that the'site plan,,short plat, and mitigation measures be remanded to the Hearing Examiner and a public hearing be held on this application as it may be modified. ' r. "7 RECEIVED DEC 12 �� CISY OF RENiON ctirr�couWc�t GOOD SHEPHERD OF WASHINGTON 4751 SOUTH 172ND PLACE SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98188 December 12, 1988 The Honorable Earl Clymer City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 RE: Good Shepherd Group Home Proposal at 19th and Union. Dear Mayor Clymer, We respectfully ask that our request in the amount of $10, 788 (per letter dated November 7 , 1988) from the 1989 General Fund be withdrawn. A satisfactory alternative resolution has been achieved. Thank-you for your consideration in this matter. • Sincerely, 4411a2. L ng • Secretary cc: John Morris CITY OF RENTON DEC 1 2 1988 . RECEIVED CITY CLERK'S OFFICE ember 5, 1988 Renton City Council Minutes Page 346 CORRESPONDENCE A resolution of the Council of the Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle Metro: Barbara Shinpoch (METRO) was read commending Barbara Shinpoch for service on the Commended Metropolitan Council from January 1980 through December 1987, and honoring her contributions as, a member of the Transit Committee, Water Quality Committee, Rules and Organization Committee, Service Evaluation Subcommittee, and Capital Facilities Subcommittee; and chairman of the Elderly and Handicapped Transportation Subcommittee. Streets: Park Avenue Added: Letter was read from Rose Woodall, Kenny's Auto Rebuild,Inc., 618 Turn Movements Park Avenue North, Renton, objecting to "C" curbs along Park Avenue North which prohibit access into the business by southbound traffic. MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY MATHEWS, COUNCIL REFER THIS LETTER AND MR. McSHANE'S EARLIER COMMENTS TO THE TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE. CARRIED. OLD BUSINESS Utilities Committee Vice-Chair Mathews presented a report recommending Utilities Committee concurrence in the recommendation of the Public Works Department to Rezone: Good Shepherd participate in the installation of the water line in NE 19th Street from Shelton Group Home (NE 19th Avenue NE to Union Avenue NE by installing the water main. The Street), R-010-88 Committee further recommended that $6,798.00 be accepted from Good Shepherd of Washington for their share in the installation costs. MOVED BY MATHEWS, SECONDED BY NELSON, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Community Services Community Services Committee Chairman Reed presented a report regarding Committee the Renton Museum. A presentation was made to the Committee outlining Historical Society plans for future growth and options for funding full-time professional Museum museum staff. The Committee requested that the administration work with the museum board to develop options for presentation to the Council, including but not limited to: 1) the City would assume responsibility for the museum and hire two staff people; 2) the City would provide funds to the museum board to allow them to retain their own staff; or 3) the museum would maintain service as currently being provided. Community Development: Community Services Committee Chairman Reed presented a report Departmental Remodeling recommending that the Council authorize an expenditure of up to $55,800 to Funds buy partitions and modular work stations for third floor personnel as part of the first quarter 1989 remodel of the Community Development Department. MOVED BY REED, SECONDED BY TRIMM, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. It was reported that funds are available in the 1988 budget. Streets: Union Avenue Councilman Stredicke asked the Administration to prepare a report explaining Lane Marking whether parking should be prohibited on Union Avenue NE and SE. Although marked for two lane travel, the road allows for four lanes of traffic when cars pass on the right, a legal maneuver according to the Police Department. Mr. Stredicke explained that cars passing on the right of left- turning cars on that street have struck parked cars. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS Ways and Means Ways and Means Committee Chairman Stredicke presented a report Committee recommending the following resolutions for reading and adoption: Resolution #2744 A resolution was read adopting and approving the Renton Municipal Airport Airport: Master Plan Master Plan. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY KEOLKER- WHEELER, COUNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED. Resolution #2745 A resolution was read adopting the NE 44th Street benefit area assessment Streets: Transportation study and adopting the study and its traffic mitigation charges as City policy Benefit District for NE under the State Environmental Policy Act. For the record, Chairman 44th Street Stredicke clarified that the portion affecting Lake Washington Boulevard is located east of I-405. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, COUNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED. Resolution #2746 A resolution was read supporting fiscal equity for City financed health care King County: Health services and supporting the efforts of the City of Auburn to resolve legal Contract, Support of issues related to the responsibility of King County to fund health care Auburn's Arbitration services. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY MATHEWS, COUNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED. rTr/ 10 CITY OF RENTON FINANCE DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor Maxine E. Motor, City Clerk December 8, 1988, Ms. Darlene Lang Good Shepherd of Washington 4751 South 172nd Place Seattle, WA 98188 Re: Good Shepherd Group Home Development - 19th and Union Dear Ms. Lang: The Renton City Council at its regular meeting of December 5, 1988, concurred in the Utilities Committee report to participate in the installation of the water line in NE 19th Street from Shelton Avenue NE to Union Avenue NE by installing the water main. Please note the committee report recommends that $6,798 be accepted from Good Shepherd of Washington for their share in the installation costs. • Please contact the Public Works Department regarding payment of this participation cost. If you have further questions, please feel free to contact this office. Yours truly, CITY OF RENTON Maxine E. Motor, CMC City Clerk Enclosure cc: Ron Olsen, Utility Engineer; 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2501 UTILITIES COMMITTEE COMMITTEE REPORT DECEMBER 5, 1988 PARTICIPATION REQUEST, GOOD SHEPHERD OF WASHINGTON - INSTALLATION OF 8" WATER LINE IN NE 19TH STREET FROM SHELTON AVENUE NE TO UNION AVENUE NE (Referred 11/14/88) The Utilities Committee recommends Council concur in the recommendation of the Public Works Department to participate in the installation of the water line in NE 19th Street from Shelton Avenue NE to Union Avenue NE by installing the water main. It further recommends that $6,798. 00 be accepted from Good Shepherd of Washington for their share in the installation costs. • Robert J. Hughes, Chair Y \ nktalUAL Nancy Mat ws Toni Nelson t$ ® CITY OF RENTON "LL PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor Director RECEIVED November 19, 1988 NOV2 i 1988 Robert Hughes, Chairman CITY OF RENIUN Members of the Utilities Committee ITY �OUP1CIl Subject: GOOD SHEPHERD OF WASHINGTON Installation of 8" Water Line NE 19th St. from Shelton to Union Ave. NE Dear Chairman Hughes and Committee Members: The Utility Engineering Department has reviewed the request for cost participation by the City in the installation of the aforementioned water main, and finds merit in the request, for the following reasons: 1. The City had previously agreed to participate in the installation of the same water main with Mr Van Pary a few years ago. 2. The City has an existing 2" Galv. water main in the street that is experiencing frequent leaks and is in need of replacement. 3. The City has received $2,135.00 from one of the abutting property owners for their share of installation of this water main. 4. The City has required the installation of an additional fire hydrant as well as an additional 119 feet of water main to complete a loop that would not be a requirement of this development. After some discussion with the representative of Good Shepherd, it was decided that the City could best participate in this installation, by installing the main, and have Good Shepherd participate financially in its installation. The previously agreed upon participation by the City with Van Pary, was 63% City and 37% Van Pary. Based on the same participation ratio on the now estimated cost for installation of $18,374.00, Good Shepherd's participation would be $6,798.00. This amount is more than the present estimated cost of materials. 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2569 Robert Hughes, Chairman Members of the Utilities Committee November 19, 1988 Page Two If the water line is installed at the same time the proposed sewer main is installed, the street restoration for the sewer main installation should be sufficient to cover the water line as well . It should be noted that participation in a water line installation, where an existing substandard line exists, was most recently done November 1, 1988 with the James H. Budd request for participation. It is the recommendation the of Public Works Department that the City participate in the installation of this water main by having City crews install the water line, and accept a cash participation from Good Shepherd in the amount of $6,798.00 for their share of the installation cost. Very truly yours, Kenneth E. Nyber Acting Public oric irec or GOODSHEP.RLO:mf December 5. 1988 ,. Renton City Council Minutes .-- Page 345 comparison with existing rates; and suggested provision of manufacturing catalogs of bin types, and inclusion of multifamily residences in recycling programs. Joan Walker, 1433 Monterey Avenue NE, Renton, asked whether residents living in multifamily dwellings would be participating in the recycling program. Mr. Springer explained that the solid waste coordinator would be responsible for working with multifamily residents to encourage recycling. Mrs. Walker indicated that although many residents do an excellent job of, composting their yard waste, others are guilty of illegal dumping. Don Dentz, 12918 NE 131st, Kirkland, discussed.the distinction between commingled and source-separated recyclables. Noting that the consultant study favors source-separated recycling at the curb, he defined "source- separated" as placement of recyclables in five separate bins. Otherwise, sorting five types of recyclables in three bins would be considered commingling, and would probably increase cost of the service since further sorting would be required by the collector. Mr. Dentz indicated his opinion that volume of recycling depends more on demographics than frequency of collection as stated in the study. Jerry Hardebeck, 21737 SE 259th, Maple Valley, Manager of Rainier Disposal, indicated that the company's recycling programs are working very well and have exceeded waste diversion levels described in the study at almost 50% for both yard waste and curbside recycling. He suggested that as part of its recycling program, the City enact a commercial recycling rate structure wherein the contractor would provide custom-painted containers, collect mixed waste paper, and deliver it to a processing plant at 60% of the cost of garbage collection. Lastly, Mr. Hardebeck requested that Council consider adding a market risk-sharing provision to the RFPs for the contract to allow the contractor and City to share in both the down and up sides of market conditions. He supported continuation of expanded service within 20 feet of the street to assist elderly and disabled residents and those living on steep lots, and asked that Rainier Disposal have the opportunity to meet with the Utilities Committee prior to deliberations on the new garbage contract to discuss loopholes in the current contract. MOVED BY MATHEWS, SECONDED BY REED, COUNCIL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. CARRIED. MOVED BY REED, SECONDED BY MATHEWS, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE PLANNING MANAGER AND REFER THIS MATTER BACK TO UTILITIES COMMITTEE FOR MONITORING. CARRIED. AUDIENCE COMMENT Bill McShane, Gary's Automotive, 541 Park Avenue, Renton, requested that Streets: Park Avenue the divider recently installed on Park Avenue be modified to allow for left Turn Movements turn movements into at least one driveway to his business during non-peak traffic periods. (See later motion under Correspondence.) Citizen Comment: Richter Marge Richter, 300 Meadow Avenue N., Renton, requested that microphones - Microphones in Council be purchased for use by the city attorney and administrative assistant during Chambers Council meetings to assist the audience in hearing the proceedings. CONSENT AGENDA Items on the Consent Agenda are adopted by one motion which follows the listing. Annexation: Hudson City Clerk submitted notice of approval from King County Boundary Review Board regarding Hudson Annexation. Refer to Ways and Means Committee. Annexation: Renton 91 Planning Division requested public meeting be scheduled on 12/19/88, to consider the 10% notice of intent petition for the Renton 91 Annexation, 14 acres located in the vicinity of SE 76th Street (north of NE 44th Street). Council concur. Annexation: Balko Planning Division requested public meeting be scheduled on 12/19/88, to consider the 10% notice of intent petition for the Balko Annexation, 110 acres located north of NE 4th Street between Duvall Avenue NE and 155th Avenue NE. Council concur. Rezone: Good Shepherd (Public Works Department submitted request from Good Shepherd of Group Home (NE 19th Washington for City participation in watermain and fire hydrant at the NE Street), R-010-88 ' 19th Street group home site. Refer to Utilities Committee.. (See later Utilities Committee report, Old Business.) MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY MATHEWS, COUNCIL ADOPT THE CONSENT AGENDA AS PRESENTED. CARRIED. \ - For.use By City Clerk's Office Only A. I . # C• e. AGENDA ITEM RENTON CITY COUNCIL MEETING a s s=as x SUBMITTING Dept./Div./Bd./Comm. Public Works Dept. For Agenda Of 12/05/88 (Meeting Date) Staff Contact Ken Nyberg and Ron Olsen (Name) Agenda Status: SUBJECT: Good Shepherd Group Home Development - Consent `r 19th and Union , request for City Public Hearing participation in cost of watermain and Correspondence Ordinance/Resolution fire hydrant. Old Business Exhibits: (Legal Descr. , Maps, Etc.)Attach New Business Study Session A. Letter from Ms. Lang dated 11/21/88 Other B. C. Approval : Legal Dept. Yes No N/A COUNCIL ACTION RECOMMENDED: Refer to Finance Dept. Yes No. N/A Utilities Committee Other Clearance FISCAL IMPACT: Expenditure Required $ Amount $ Appropriation- $ Budgeted Transfer Required SUMMARY (Background information, prior action and effect of implementation) (Attach additional pages if necessary. ) PARTIES OF RECORD/INTERESTED CITIZENS TO BE CONTACTED: SUBMIT THIS COPY TO CITY CLERK BY NOON ON THURSDAY WITH DOCUMENTATION. f� R{ GOOD SHEPHERD OF WASHINGTON 4751 SOUTH 172ND PLACE SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98188 243-7044 November 21, 1988 Ron Olsen, Utility Engineer Engineering Division Public Works Department ' City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 Re: Good Shepherd Group Home Development - 19th and Union. Dear Mr. Olsen: This letter is a formal request that the City of Renton participate with Good Shepherd in the project development of a water main on N.E. 19th Street between Shelton Ave. and Union Ave. and a fire hydrant to be located at the corner of N.E. 19th and N.E. Shelton. The projected dated for development to begin is February 1, 1989 . Sincerely, 04411101V/17g- Secretary cc: Earl Clymer Mike Parness Kenneth Nyberg Don Monaghan John Morris / 0 CITY OF RENTON Engineering Dept. j t" CITY OF RENTON FINANCE DEPARTMENT . Earl Clymer, Mayor Maxine E. Motor, City Clerk November 21, 1988 Mrs. Darlene Lang Good Shepherd of Washington 4751 South 172nd Seattle, WA 98188 Re: Appeal of Rezone R-010-88 NE 19th Group Home Good Shepherd of Washington Dear Mrs. Lang: The Zoning Division and the Building Division have concurred in your request that the $1,000 bond required by the City Council on October 3, 1988 as a condition of the above-captioned rezone, will become a condition of the building permit. At the regular meeting of October 3, the Renton City Council also concurred in the recommendation of the Hearing Examiner and required restrictive covenants be signed as follows: 1. That the property shall be used for a group home for not more than six developmentally disabled adults. 2. In all other respects the use limitations on the property shall be those of the R-1 zoning code. 3. The failure to develop the property according to the terms of the Conditional Use Permit within one year, or to otherwise abandon the specific Conditional Use Permit or discontinue this group home for any reason, shall cause the property to revert to its prior R-1 zoning classification. Please file the covenants with this office. Upon receipt of the restrictive covenants and city approval, the ordinance approving the rezone will be adopted. If you have further questions, please do not hesitate to contact this office. Yours truly, CITY OF RENTON Maxine E. Motor, CMC City Clerk cc: Building Director Zoning Administrator 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2501 Facsimile (206) 235-2513 to "40% CITY OF RENTON "LL FINANCE DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor Maxine E. Motor, City Clerk November 16, 1988 Mrs. Darlene Lang 4751 South 172nd Place Seattle, WA 98188 Re: Appeal of Good Shepherd of Washington and CU-010-88 Ref: Memo dated October 5, 1988 Dear Mrs. Lang: As of this date the City of Renton has not received the $1, 000 bond referred to in the above-referenced memo. Adoption of an ordinance pertaining to your case is contingent upon receipt of this bond. We would appreciate your immediate attention to this matter. Please feel free to contact this office if you have further questions. Yours truly, CITY OF RENTON Maxine E. Motor, CMC City Clerk cc: Don Ericksen Parties of Record • • 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2501 t S R0 W rtrtN1 T N• rtrn H b� � E.19. 1 1Nn 0 �0 In rt1-1 rt N >v rt N ;.toM: ort (Dcr Ort (D � N• rtnrtK 4iVgli t3' rtN i000oK �' I • H• cD (DI-• HI1I7K aoOtD '� Nn � rtO K ,ro n o' rt w Crt (D K rt K w PTrt � w (D wwKoQQ rt IJ (DO n R rtN ° NCrt, 14z • rtCtnw < I - 0IJ• H (D In w rt (a0rt t@ � � • IncD x � .. 0 0 P rt �' H K I�• O K 0o w Mg b hhFh rt rt p• k, , Fh rt M 0 rt 0 0 @ 00 rtrt 101 00O 4 00'• 0 K K 00 o0rt rt � tD qgg rt rt ' (D H fiN � Inrtrn iv'tig0 18N a % H K � � N( rt rtN �' 0 1(4ben8V TOb Z n (DK � 0 03 04N0 r rti 0DIAn HP. O 00 rt nA N � ' Vrtprtgrtrtrtrt till 'O N m N �j �C K oa HUIo °o Q-' Nw H � P � 0 h x o0 rt0rt ID o rt rtPAl0rt rh PO xO n K K 5•• It rtrtrtH (D (D I-h i. N. Y. • 0 4 J '� P (D N• L O H H 00 ID K IN80M010JV� KroN ((�Dprt• � rh M (D0 • + rh 0 v ¢ (D 0 t� hh K 0 If F rt CO • 0 O 011 • �+ yy0 rt1,• K (D rtCa M rt rt (D �' NN ,,OgKAI kAl W i � w rt 1rt Iv ano H hh pItrt( � IA � n MHrt 4 mi Iv (D O Iv AO' K rtN• 4rt D K rtk rt 80 to K rt rt � � 1 C (D In rt (D N CD0H il �• rt � rt rtIn W rtO ; Z 0 vs 0 4J0 •d Tip d 4JW k9j N si.r1 U 00 d 0 I) wo 0 p om vo T kp 1-I t7) •rA (Di; r000 6 U 0i .VVTA HaNr rM MEIV"0I N 2tZtq4P4401l4d roe' : °� x �OLIH>t•'�' � u ThAkl1 511 OQ w A m U U ITEM #1 RECAP OF 1988 CITY GENERAL FUNDS ALLOCATED TO 19TH AND UNION Street widening and Sidewalk improvements $15, 000 Sewer main extension (partial contribution) 4 , 924 Total 1988 General Fund Allocation $19, 924 ITEM #2 REVISED 1988 CITY GENERAL FUNDS ALLOCATION TO 19TH AND UNION Street and Sidewalk improvements $15, 917 Sewer main extension (partial contributuion) 4, 007 Total 1988 General Fund Allocation $19 , 924 ITEM #3 REVISED PROPOSED USE OF 1989 GENERAL FUND REQUEST FOR 19TH AND UNION a. Proposed City Participation in required oversizing 10,788 .00 waterline from 6" to 8" and installation of required fire hydrant. b. Good Shepherd Participation 7, 586. 84 c. Offsite Water related total project cost (1988) 18 , 374. 84 ITEM #4 RECAP OF COST BREAKDOWN PER UTILITIES COMMITTEE OF FEBRUARY 1986 Van Parys Contribution $3 , 975. 00 Previously Collected Funds From 2,135.00 Other Neighbors to be served by this development. Total Private Contribution $6, 110. 00 City Participation 4, 653 .75 Total Cost of Project (1986) $10, 763.75 I, BOARD OF PUBLIC WORKS October 12, 1988 Page 2 6. NEW BUSINESS: None 7. OLD BUSINESS: None Good She herd - continued from last week. A letter from Don Monaghan stated Puget Power had providedyest 19th, west of Union Ave. N.E. in connection with the Good Shepherd mates for revisions to the power system on N.E. raising and moving the poles to accommodate the street improvementspsoapp o Cmt ely $6,000. Cost for undergrounding this same service in conjunction with the sidewalk installation is approximately $13,000. Review of R W Permits - continued from last week. Continued for one week. 8 COMMENTS AND ANNOUNCEMENTS: None 9. ADJOURNMENT: The meeting adjourned at 9:30 a.m. . . - November 7, 1988 Renton City Council Mina` Page 315 CAG: 877075, South 7th Public Works/Traffic Engineering Division submitted CAG-075-87, South 7th Street and Rainier Street and Rainier Avenue South; and requests approval of the project, Avenue South authorization for final pay estimate of.$38,712.61, commencement of 30-day lien period, and release of retained amount of $14,109.34 to contractor, R. W. Scott, if all required releases have been received. Council concur. MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY MATHEWS, COUNCIL ADOPT THE CONSENT AGENDA AS AMENDED. CARRIED. Councilman Stredicke requested a status report indicating whether roadway conditions have been met for the Craftsman Homes plat on Duvall Avenue NE between NE 17th and NE 21st Street (File No. R-039-87, PP-040-87). CORRESPONDENCE Petition was read containing 145 signatures from Renton Hill residents Citizen Comment: Renton requesting return of yard clipping container on Renton Hill to be maintained Hill Petition - Return of and regulated by the City. MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, Clipping Container SECONDED BY MATHEWS, COUNCIL REFER THIS MATTER TO UTILITIES COMMITTEE FOR NEGOTIATION ON THE GARBAGE CONTRACT. CARRIED. Rezone: Good Shepherd, ;Letter was read from Darlene Lang, Good Shepherd of Washington, 4751 Group Home (NE 19th South 172nd Place, Seattle, requesting inclusion of $10,788 in the 1989 Street), R-010-88, 1989 Housing and Human Services budget to cover cost of fire hydrant and portion H&HR Funding Request of cost of water main oversizing ($6,788) and cost of additional landscaping ($4,000) required by the City for the group home proposal on NE 19th Street. The letter listed current City of Renton appropriations for off-site costs associated with development of the home at $30,617 from 1988 block grant program, $19,924 from City of Renton general fund, and $17,519 from 1989 block grant program (to be shared with group home at 10th and Olympia). MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY MATHEWS, COUNCIL REFER THIS LETTER TO THE COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE SERVING AS THE BUDGET COMMITTEE. CARRIED. Citizen Comment: Added petition was read containing 10 signatures of residents on Talbot Road Fournier Petition - South requesting the City to retain the option for the Planning Commission to Comprehensive Plan initiate site specific or neighborhood comprehensive plan changes as provided Review of Hospital Area for by RCW 35.63. The petition indicated support for Planning Commission by Planning Commission guidance and review of comprehensive plan for the area south of Valley Medical Center to assure compatibility with growth of the medical community and adjacent commercial properties. MOVED BY REED, SECONDED BY MATHEWS, COUNCIL REFER THIS CORRESPONDENCE TO THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE. CARRIED. Citizen Comment: Added correspondence was read from Norman Peterson, 3402 Park Avenue • Peterson - Police N., Renton, urging training for police officers to assist them in determining Training whether cult members are responsible for killing horses in the. area. MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY MATHEWS, COUNCIL REFER THIS LETTER TO THE ADMINISTRATION FOR APPROPRIATE RESPONSE. CARRIED. • SPECIAL Correspondence was presented from Administrative Assistant Michael Parness PRESENTATIONS advising presentation of status reports at this time concerning Victoria Hills Phase II final planned unit development and E & H Properties development. , PUD: Final, Victoria Hills Planning Manager Larry Springer discussed status of the Victoria Hills Phase Phase II, FPUD-042-85 II project in meeting conditions established in Resolution No. 2742, adopted 10/3/88, which allowed relocation of the main access road to Benson Road, and allowed realignment of Victoria Lane and relocation of two buildings to save a stand of trees. Hydroseeding of the entire site and connection of erosion control devices to functioning storm drains was also required by 10/15/88. Mr. Springer indicated that on a field trip to the site on 10/18/88, staff found that the hydroseeding had not been completed nor was the storm drainage system functioning as required. On a second visit on 10/26/88, substantial compliance had been made with the requirement to install interim erosion control devices; however, a required Temporary Erosion/Sedimentation Control Plan (TESCP) had not been provided. Mr. Springer advised that two new compliance dates are recommended: 11/4/88 for submission of a revised TESCP, and 11/15/88 for full compliance with provisions in the TESCP. Councilman Stredicke questioned why an extension to the deadline was granted to the applicant. Mr. Springer advised that the applicant had substantially met the requirements by the specified date, and had been very responsive in cooperating with the City. He also agreed to keep Council apprised of all progress on the site. 7. b . GOOD SHEPHERD OF WASHINGTON. 4751 SOUTH 172ND PLACE SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98188 .;Y (.4:h'tN October 19, 1988 OCT 2 r 1988 The Honorable Earl Clymer City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 RE: Good Shepherd Group Home Proposal at 19th and Union. Dear Mayor Clymer, Please consider this request in the amount of $10 ,788 to be included in your 1989 Human Services Budget Review. The request includes the $6788 to cover the cost of the fire hydrant, and a portion of the cost of oversizing the water main which the Utilities Committee recommended for City participation on February 17, 1986 (Attachment) and $4000 which would cover a portion of the additional landscaping required by the city. Current City of Renton appropriations for off-site costs associated with the development of this home are as follows: ' The 1988 Block Grant Program $30 , 617 . 00 City of Renton General Fund 19, 924.00 The 1989 Block Grant Program $17 , 519 . 00 (to be shared 10th and Olympia site) Estimated off-site development costs , including water, sewer, street and sidewalk development and water and sewer connection fees total approximately $60,592. 30 . There are other associated costs which HUD does not cover such as the additional landscaping, the hose& bibs , and fencing. The development of this project is definitely an asset to the City of Renton. The development of the utilities on 19th Street will significantly upgrade the current neighborhood and facilitate the development of a large area immediately across the street. The construction of the two homes will generate an estimated $4, 800 in sales tax to the City of Renton. Approximately $217 ,728 per year (operational dollars) will be spent in the Renton area. The prolonged reviews of this project and the additional requirements imposed on the development of this home have had a critical 'impact on our original budget. Therefore, we would deeply appreciate your consideration of this request. S 'ncerel yr, a g CITY OF RENTON Secretary OCT 2 5 1988 o : RECEIVED CITY CLERK'S OFFICE • UTILITIES COMMITTEE COMMITTEE REPORT OCT 2 ; 19$8 FEBRUARY 17, 1986 ' `+Y�,; :,'+r•;-EC ; • VanParys Request for City Participation and Latecomer Agreement. (Referred 12-09-85) The Utilities Committee concurs in the recommendation of the Public Works Department to participate in the materials cost of oversizing from 6 inch to 8 inch pipe as required by the Comp. Plan, in the amount of $1,312.50, to pay the cost of constructing approximately 120 L.F. of watermain to complete the loop to Union Ave. N.E. system at a cost of $1,841.25, to pay an amount of $2,135.00 which was previously collected for this particular system and to pay for the cost of a hydrant to be installed at the inter- section of N.E. 19th and Shelton Avenues, at a cost of $1,500.00. Total Cost of this Project is: $10,763.75 Cost Breakdown: VanParys $ 3,975.00 Previously Collected Funds 2,135.00 City Participation 4,653.75 • $10,763.75 The Committee further concurs with the Public Works Department and recommends the Latecomer request not be allowed. Earl Clymer, Chairman John Reed Richard Stredicke . CITY OF RENTON N LL ? FINANCE DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor Maxine E. Motor, City Clerk October 5, 1988 • • Mrs. Darlene Lang 4751 South 172nd Place Seattle, WA 98188 Re: Appeal of Good Shepherd of Washington Rezone and CU-010-88 Dear Mrs. Lang: The Renton City Council at its regular meeting of October 3, 1988, adopted the attached Planning and Development Committee report reversing the Hearing Examiner's No. 4 decision (requiring a landscape irrigation system) with the condition that the applicant post a $1,000 bond for the purpose of replacement of landscaping as stated in the report. Please forward the $1,000 bond to Don Ericksen, Zoning Administrator, Community Development Department. Feel free to contact this office if you have further questions. Yours truly, CITY OF RENTON Maxine E. Motor, CMC City Clerk Enclosure cc: Don Ericksen Parties of Record 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2501 October 3, 1988 Renton City Council Minutes Page 287 Public Works: Public Works/Utilities Department requested review of ordinance provisions Termination of Water concerning termination of water service to comply with State law. Refer to Service Ordinance Utilities Committee. MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY STREDICKE, COUNCIL ADOPT THE CONSENT AGENDA AS PRESENTED. CARRIED. CORRESPONDENCE Petitions were submitted by Ray Gervais, 506 Windsor Place NE, Renton, Citizen Comment: Gervais containing 556 signatures of residents supporting retention of Fire Station No. - Petitions for Retention 12 in its present location at Harrington Avenue NE and NE 9th Street. of Fire Station No. 12 Comprehensive Plan: Added letter was read from Robert W. Thorpe, R. W. Thorpe & Associates, Southeast - R. W. Thorpe Inc., 1300 Alaska Building, 2nd and Cherry, Seattle, requesting Request for Review Comprehensive Plan update for an 80-acre parcel located north of 292nd, east of Talbot Hill Road and west of SR-167 in conjunction with Dr. Heye's property. MOVED BY TRIMM, SECONDED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, COUNCIL REFER THIS LETTER TO THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT AND REPORT BACK TO COUNCIL AS TO WHEN DISCUSSION REGARDING THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATES WILL TAKE PLACE. CARRIED. OLD BUSINESS Planning and Development Committee Chairman Mathews presented a report Planning and regarding the appeal of rezone for Good Shepherd of Washington Group Development Committee Home on NE 19th Street, east of Shelton Avenue NE and west of Union Appeal: Good Shepherd Avenue NE. The applicant had requested a rezone from R-1 to G-1, and a Group Home Rezone (NE I conditional use permit to develop the site with a group home for six 19th Street), R-010-88 developmentally disabled adults. The applicant appealed the Hearing Examiner's decision #4 requiring an automated irrigation system. As to the Hearing Examiner's recommendation on the rezone, the Committee found there was no error, and recommended concurrence in the Hearing Examiner's recommendation. As to the Hearing Examiner's decision on the conditional use permit, the committee found an error of law in applying the landscaping and irrigation requirements on the group home without some provision being made for the hybrid nature of the use. Therefore, the committee recommended that the Hearing Examiner's decision, which requires a fully automatic irrigation system, be reversed on the condition that: The applicant post a $1,000 bond for the purpose of replacement of landscaping in the event of loss of trees, shrubbery, and/or ground cover. Any diminution of the bond amount to replace the landscaping shall be replaced by the applicant. This bond requirement shall be in effect for three (3) years. If there is a pattern of non-maintenance over a three (3) year period, the applicant herein shall be required to install an automated irrigation system as approved by city staff. If there is a pattern of proper maintenance over three (3) years, the bond may be released. However, due to the conditional use nature of the group home, the city will always be entitled to require automated irrigation if it appears that the landscaping is being ignored. MOVED BY MATHEWS, SECONDED BY REED, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. PUD: Preliminary, Honey Planning and Development Committee Chairman Mathews presented a report Creek, PPUD-015-84 regarding the Honey Creek PPUD access, referred on 6/20/88. The Committee recommended that this matter should be an application for a modification to a PPUD and should be handled by the administrative staff. Therefore, this matter is being deleted from the Committee referral list. MOVED BY MATHEWS, SECONDED BY REED, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS Ways and Means Ways and Means Committee Chairman Stredicke presented a report Committee recommending the following ordinance for first reading: Rezone: Renton Public An ordinance was read changing the zoning classification of approximately Works Department, R- two acres of property located on Carr Road, east of Valley Medical Center 021-88 (Carr Road and south of the present Covenant Church building from R-1, single family Reservoir) residential use, to P-1, public use; City of Renton Public Works Department; South Talbot Hill reservoir; File No. R-021-88. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, COUNCIL REFER THIS ORDINANCE BACK TO COMMITTEE FOR ONE WEEK. CARRIED. PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE REPORT TO: Renton City Council FROM: Planning & Development Committee RE: Good Shepherd of Washington Group Home R-010-88 and C.U. - 010-88 The Planning and Development Committee convened on September 1 and September 15, 1988, to consider the appeal of the decision of the Hearing Examiner dated July 15, 1988 . Applicant seeks to rezone the subject property from R-1 to G-1, and to develop the site with a group home for six developmentally disabled adults through a Conditional Use Permit. The subject property is located on the 3900 block of N.E. 19th Street, or the south side of N.E. 19th Street east of Shelton Avenue N.E. and west of Union Avenue N.E. ' Applicant appeals the Hearing Examiner's decision #4 requiring an automated irrigation system. As to the Hearing Examiner' s recommendation on the rezone, the committee found that there was no error, and recommends concurrence in the Hearing Examiner' s recommendation. As to the Hearing Examiner' s decision on the Conditional Use Permit, the committee found an error of law in applying the landscaping and irrigation requirements on the group home without some provision being made for the hybrid nature of the use. Therefore, the committee recommends that the Hearing Examiner' s decision, which requires a fully automatic irrigation system, be reserved on the condition that: The applicant post a $1,000.00 bond for the purpose of replacement of landscaping in the event of loss of trees, shrubbery, and/or ground cover. Any diminution of the bond amount to replace the landscaping shall be replaced by the applicant. This bond requirement shall be in effect for three (3) years. If there is a pattern of non- maintenance over a three (3) year period, the applicant herein shall be required to install an automated irrigation system as approved by city staff. If there is a pattern of proper maintenance over three (3) years, the bond may be released. However, due to the conditional use nature of the group home, the city will always be entitled Ito require automated irrigation if it appears that the CC : / c;'landscaping is being ignored. oe Planning/& Development Committee Report - 1 1 . /^r Dated: October 3, 1988 . ‘11PIAAL,u* --111)( "tg,P kr LA.-- Nancy Mat ws, Chairperson �uF 4C11149 Richard Stredicke ,L,..,(4,,,, ,,Z14171___— n Reed CITY6 . 17 : 9-26-88 :as . Planning & Development Committee Report - 2 PARTIES OF RECORD 09/21/88 J. Howard Finch, President Friends of Youth 2500 Lake Washington Blvd. North Renton, WA 98056 Ed Stanley 18940 Marine View Drive Seattle, WA 98166 Darlene Lang 4751 South 172nd Place Seattle, WA 98188 Mary Healy 512 Morris Avenue S Renton, WA 98055 33D4 9Z � � 9Sow RENTON CITY COUNCIL Regular Meeting October 10, 1988 Municipal Building Monday, 7:30 p.m. Council Chambers MINUTES CALL TO ORDER Mayor Earl Clymer led the Pledge of Allegiance to the flag and called the meeting of the Renton City Council to order. ROLL CALL OF '. KATHY KEOLKER-WHEELER, Council President; TONI NELSON, COUNCIL MEMBERS NANCY L. MATHEWS, JOHN W. REED, THOMAS W. TRIMM, RICHARD M. .STREDICKE. MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY MATHEWS, COUNCIL EXCUSE ABSENT COUNCILMAN ROBERT J. HUGHES. CARRIED. CITY STAFF IN EARL CLYMER, Mayor; MICHAEL W. PARNESS, Administrative Assistant; ATTENDANCE LAWRENCE J. WARREN, City Attorney; MAXINE E. MOTOR, City Clerk; RICHARD C. HOUGHTON, Public Works Director;. GARY NORRIS, Traffic Engineer; JOHN ADAMSON, Program Development.Coordinator; KEN NYBERG, Acting Deputy Public Works Director; LT. DENNIS GERBER, Police Department ' PRESS Leonard Saari, Valley Daily News APPROVAL OF Council President.Keolker-Wheeler announced that approval of the minutes COUNCIL MINUTES of October 3, 1988, will be postponed until October 10, 1988. CONSENT AGENDA Items on the Consent Agenda are adopted by one motion which follows the listing. ` CAG: 87-040, Maplewood Parks Department submitted CAG-040-87, Maplewood Golf Course Golf Course Expansion Expansion Project; and requested approval of the project, authorization for Project final pay estimate, commencement of 30-day lien period, and release of retained amount of $29,794.66 to contractor, Northwest Landscape Industries, if all required releases have been received. Council concur. Board/Commission: Planning Commission submitted report regarding Hazardous Waste Facility Planning Commission Zone Designations Ordinance. Refer to Committee of the Whole for Report on Hazardous presentation this date. Waste Facility Zone Designations Ordinance CAG: 88-009, 1988 Public Works Department submitted CAG-009-88, 1988 Rubberized Track Rubberized Track Crossing contract; and requested approval of the project, authorization for Crossing final pay estimate in the amount of $55,632.00, commencement of 30-day lien period, and release of retained amount of $2,928.00 to contractor, Hi- Rail Corporation, if all required releases have been received. Council concur. . Claim .Houlbjerg, CL- Claim for damages in the amount of $42.16 filed by Patricia Houlbjerg, 2218 49-88'" NE 7th Street, as reimbursement for water useag a in watering down NE 7th Street under construction by King Construction Co. Refer to City Attorney and insurance carrier. MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY MATHEWS, • COUNCIL ADOPT CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS A-D AS PRESENTED. CARRIED. COMMITTEE REPORTS: Public Works: Funding Transportation Committee recommended transfer of $50,000 from the 317 for SW 16th Paving account to fund paving of SW 16th Street in conjunction with the closing of during Lind Avenue the Lind Avenue SW bridge over I-405. Refer to Ways and Means Bridge Reconstruction Committee for proper legislation. Rezone: Good Shepherd Utilities Committee concurred with the recommendation of the Public Works Group Home. NE 19th Department, Finance Department and City Attorney to deny the request from Street, R-010, Request Good Shepherd for relief from the utility connection charges. for Waiver • COMMITTEE REPORT Utilities Committee Good Shepherd Request for Relief from Utility Connection Charges (Referred September 19, 1988) The Utilities Committee concurs with the recommendation of the Public Works Department, Finance Department and City Attorney to deny the request from Good Shepherd for relief from the utility connection charges. Robert Hughes, Chairman Nancy Matt ws, Vice Chairman Toni Nelson, Member RCH:mf 4'0 ® CITY OF RENTON "'LL PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor Richard C. Houghton, Director October 6, 1988 Robert Hughes, Chairman Members of the Utility Committee Subject: Good Shepherd Request for RElief from Utility Connection Charges Dear Committee Members: The above referenced request has been reviewed by the Public Works Department, the Finance Department and the City Attorney. We all concur that this request cannot be honored. Basically, one fund cannot benefit from another. Therefore, we recommend this request be denied. Very truly yours, Richard Houghton Public Works Director RCH:mf 11111 1.1:11 A..o«,.o C..,.rl. - D nOncc _ 1,111c% nnc_nccn SeotEr.iber 19, 1988 • Renton City Council Minute Page 271 CORRESPONDENCE Letter was read from Darlene Lang, Good Shepherd of Washington, 4751 S. Rezone: Good Shepherd, 172nd Place, Seattle, requesting waiver of water and sewer connection costs �.roun-_Home. NE 19th- in the total amount of $4,030.32 to serve the Good Shepherd group home at Street, R-010-88, NE 19th Street and Shelton Avenue NE. The letter advised that significant Request for Waiver additional costs have been imposed on this project during the development process not covered by HUD 202 funds. MOVED BY MATHEWS, SECONDED BY TRIMM, COUNCIL REFER THIS MATTER TO UTILITIES COMMITTEE FOR RECOMMENDATION. CARRIED. Councilman Stredicke requested a report reflecting amount of funds the City `.:Renton is contributing or waiving for the two Good Shepherd sites. Latecomer Agreement: Letter was read from James and Thelma Budd, 1402 N. 36th Street, Renton, Budd, N. 36th Street requesting latecomer agreement for adjacent properties and City of Renton to share in cost of 8-inch water main installed to serve Tract No. 36, C.D. Hillman's Lake Washington Garden of Eden Division #2, at N. 36th Street between Meadow Avenue N. and Park Avenue N. MOVED BY KEOLKER- WHEELER, SECONDED BY REED, COUNCIL REFER THIS MATTER TO UTILITIES COMMITTEE. CARRIED. Citizen Comment: Letter signed by 15 employees at 5th and Park was read citing incident on Protection of Wildlife 9/12/88, in which employees tried to help young deer wandering in the area, and felt situation was mishandled by police officers in a vehicle who chased the deer into an adjacent building under construction where it fell to its death. The letter requested that the City change its current policy concerning wild deer and other animals that roam into this jurisdiction. MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY REED, COUNCIL REFER THIS MATTER TO THE ADMINISTRATION TO DEVELOP POLICY AND REPORT BACK TO COUNCIL. Mayor Clymer read letter from Police Chief Alan Wallis indicating that the officers had declined the help of bystanders and preferred instead to let the animal mellow out since it exhibited symptoms of stress. The deer then ran around the parking garage where she fell from an upper story. Council members expressed concern regarding the incident and requested that a policy be developed to return wildlife to its natural environment without harm. CARRIED. Appeal: Good Shepherd Correspondence was read from Clara Mayes, 1056 Olympia Avenue NE, Group Home Rezone, R- Renton, opposing rezone to R-1 for property located on Olympia Avenue NE 015-88 proposed for development of group home. MOVED BY KEOLKER- WHEELER, SECONDED BY HUGHES, COUNCIL REFER LETTER TO OFFICIAL FILE, R-015-88. CARRIED. Rezone: E & H Correspondence was read from Mr. & Mrs. Roger Paquette, 328 Garden N., Properties, R-016-87, Renton, commending the City for relieving traffic congestion in residential Traffic Revisions area by implementing right turn traffic revision at Garden Avenue and 4th North. OLD BUSINESS Councilman Stredicke asked staff to review conditions of restrictive covenants Appeal: ARCO requiring mature landscaping at site of Arco Mini-Mart on NE 4th and Conditional Use Permit, Jefferson Avenue NE just west of Renton Vo-Tec, and advised that CU-116-86, Landscaping numerous small shrubs and five of the largest trees are dead. He supported Violations authorizing city officials to stop the business from operating on the site since landscaping plans as presented to Council on review of the applicant's appeal have not been carried through. Mayor Clymer indicated that a letter will be sent to the applicant. • Transportation Transportation Committee Vice-Chairman Trimm presented a report Committee regarding the installation of the barrier striping on N. 3rd from Factory Citizen Committee: North Avenue N. to Houser Way N. After presentation from the Public Works Renton Citizens Advisory Department and input from the North Renton Citizens' Committee, the Committee, N. 3rd -Transportation Committee voted to recommend concurrence in the staff Striping recommendation that the barrier striping not be installed in the north lane on N. 3rd from Factory Avenue N. to Houser Avenue N. MOVED BY TRIMM, SECONDED BY STREDICKE, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED.. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS Ways and Means Ways and Means Committee Chairman Stredicke presented a report Committee recommending the following ordinance for second and final reading: ' CITY OF RENTON ., f. "LL FINANCE DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor • Maxine E. Motor, City Clerk September 22, 1988 Ms. Darlene R. Lang, Secretary Good Shepherd of Washington 4751 South 172nd Place Seattle, WA 98188 Dear Ms. Lang: Your letter of September 12, 1988, requesting waiver of water and sewer hook up costs for the proposed Good Shepherd residence at the 19th Street site, was considered by the Renton City Council at its reguler meeting of September 19, 1988. Your request was referred to the Utilities Committee for consideration and report back to the council. Please contact Council Secretary at telephone number 235-2586 for time and date of the committee meeting concerning this subject. If you have other questions, please do not hesitate to contact this office. Yours truly, CITY OF RENTON Maxine E. Motor, CMC City Clerk cc: Robert Hughes, Chairman, Utilities Committee • 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2501 GOOD SHEPHERD OF WASHINGTON 4751 South 172nd Place Seattle, Washington 98188 September 12, 1988 Renton City Council Kathy Koelker-Wheeler, Council President 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 R.E. : Good Shepherd Group Home, 19th Street Water and Sewer Connection Fees. Dear Councilwoman Koelker-Wheeler, We formally request a waver of the following costs associated with hook-ups for both water and sewer on the 19th Street site: Water Hook-up - 35,379 sq.ft. X 4 cents per sq. ft. = $1,415.16 Sewer Hook-up - 35,379 sq.ft. X 4 cents per sq. ft. = 1,415. 16 1 Commercial side sewer connection 50.00 1 1" water meter (service for home) 400.00 1 3/4 water meter ($400.00 + costs estimated to be) 750.00 (service for yard and landscaping) Total $4030.32 Significant requirements have been imposed on this project as it moved through the Zoning Department, Environmental Review, and the Hearing Examiner. As result, we now are faced with additional costs which were not originally included in our budget and which the HUD 202 funds will not cover. Therefore, any costs which can be pared are crucial to the success of this project. It has come to my attention that the issue of the possibility of a waver of hook-up fees associated with both sewer and water on the 19th Street site came up during the original budget process. We would deeply appreciate your consideration of this matter at this time. S ncerel , CITY OF RENTON 7/4 ,- ar ene . L g Secretary SEP 1 3 1988 DRL/tim RECEIVED CITY CLERK'S OFFICE e_ , / -IF' Wtz,,(7-9-vt,) 0 CITY OF RENTON "LL PARKS and RECREATION Earl Clymer, Mayor John E. Webley, Director HOUSING AND HUMAN RESOURCES DIVISION September 13, 1988 Ms. Nancy Mathews, Chairperson RECEIVED Planning & Development Committee City of Renton SEP 1 4 1988 211 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 Ci' CiTY COUNCIL Dear Nancy, In regards to Good Shepherd of Washington's appeal of the Hearing Examiner's requirement for a fully automated irrigation system, the Housing and Human Resources division and its Citizen Advisory Committee request that the following points be taken under advisement. 1. The Hearing Examiner found that "The house as proposed does not appear to have anv potential to create any undue impacts on surrounding homes" (emphasis added).1 Why then is it necessary to add an automatic irrigation system? That would only seem to be necessary if the project, as proposed, had the potential to create impacts requiring mitigation. 2. The Hearing Examiner further acknowledges that "The home is not unlike others in the immediate neighborhood both as to scale and lot size. Actually one of the primary differences will be that mandatory landscaping and landscaping upkeep will be required, whereas for ordinary single family homes such matters are left to the discretion of the homeowner."2 The Hearing Examiner clearly finds that "landscaping upkeep will be required" as the project was proposed. Since this is the case, automatic irrigation, while surely a convenience, will not be necessary for the upkeep of the landscaping. 3. The staff report to the Hearing Examiner contained no mention of an automatic irrigation system for this project. The staff recommended to the Hearing Examiner "....that a condition be placed upon the permit to require that the applicant develop and implement a landscaping maintenance plan, subject to approval by the City to insure the continuing quality of appearance of this site" (emphasis added).3 It appears the Hearing Examiner has exceeded his own conclusions and the staff recommendations in requiring an automatic irrigation system. 4. It can further be argued that, since in the Hearing Examiner's own words, "the home is not unlike others in the immediate neighborhood both as to scale and size", the group home can be defined as being more akin to a single family or at most two family residential use which are exempted by code from all landscaping requirements. I Conclusion #1, Conditional Use Permit 2 Conclusion #13, Conditional Use Permit 3 Staff Report Page 10, H. Landscaping 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2560 w r Ms. Naicy Mathews September 13, 1988 Page 2 5. The code regarding site plan review criteria states in part "These criteria are objectives of good site plans to be aimed for in development within the City of Renton. However, strict compliance with any one or more particular criterion may not be necessary or reasonable. These criteria also provide a frame of reference for the applicant in developing a site, but are not intended to be inflexible standards or to discourage creativity and innovation" (emphasis added). 4 The applicant is not without creativity in that they suggested that watering the landscaping is an activity the residents are not only capable of, but would enjoy. The reasonableness of requiring an automatic irrigation system also has an economic element that will have a major negative impact on this projects viability. The up front costs to the Good Shepherd organization of implementing this condition are a staggering $31,083.00. Automatic Sprinkler System Base Cost $10,133.00 General Contractor Overhead (10%) 1,013.00 Design Fee (8%) • 810.00 Contingency (5%) 506.00 $12,462.00 Tax (8.1) 1.009.00. SUBTOTAL $13,471.00 Required HUD Maintenance: (Subtract design fee ($891.00) and multiply by 2.4) $30,192.00 Add design fee 891.00 $31,083.00 6. Good Shepherd is required by HUD to maintain the property. HUD, it should be noted, has a much greater dollar investment in this project than Renton. HUD will respond to complaints of neglect from any reasonable source. 7. Finally, the Good Shepherd organization has documented beyond any reasonable doubt, through photographs and letters, that their maintenance practices, sans automatic irrigation systems, are equal to or exceed the maintenance practices of the neighborhoods in which they have group homes. With that documentation on file, the City should be able to rest assured that the Good Shepherd maintenance practices for their Renton projects will not vary from that standard. Thank you for your consideration of these points. Sincerely, • Dixon Long, Chairper on Joh .orris, Manager Citizens' Advisory Committee H►fsing & Human Resources PC: John Reed Richard Stredicke Zanetta Fontes John Webley 4 City of Renton Building Regulations 4-738, Site Plan Review Section D Irz> September 12. 1988 Renton City Council Minutes _ _ Page 256 AUDIENCE COMMENT John Scott, 400 S. 43rd Street, Renton, representing Valley Medical Center, Advancement Requested requested advancement to committee reports regarding expansion of Local Improvement District No. 329, S. 43rd Street improvement project. MOVED 2.7 iO K5 .•,T.TEE.'_.ER n NCi .ND THE lf,..LGULAR. ORDER OF BUSINESS AND ADVANCE TO TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE REPORT REGARDING LID 329 AND WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE REPORT REGARDING LOMAS REZONE/ONE VALLEY PLACE (adjacent to Valley Medical Center). CARRIED. Transportation Transportation Committee Chairman Nelson presented a report concurring Committee with the determination by Valley Medical Center and Public Works LID: 329, SW 43rd Street Department to expand LID 329 to construct the undercrossing from the north to the south side of S. 43rd Street to serve the Valley Medical Center properties. It was understood that Valley Medical Center representatives have waived the necessity of public hearing and are aware they are responsible for all additional costs connected with this undercrossing: The Committee found the undercrossing to be of public benefit and granted a street use permit at no cost until such time as the undercrossing is abandoned. The Committee recommended referral of this matter to Ways and Means Committee for proper ordinance. MOVED BY NELSON, SECONDED BY STREDICKE, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE. CARRIED. Ways and Means Ways and Means Committee Chairman Stredicke presented a report Committee recommending first reading of the following ordinance: Rezone: Lomas (One An ordinance was read changing the zoning classification of 9.17 acres of Valley Place), R-088-86 property located between the 4300 and 4500 block of Davis Avenue South from P-1 (public) to O-P (office-park); Lomas Rezone/One Valley Place; File No. R-088-86. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY MATHEWS, COUNCIL REFER THIS ORDINANCE BACK TO WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE FOR ONE WEEK. CARRIED. AUDIENCE COMMENT Roger Blaylock, 10717 NE 4th Street, Suite #9, Bellevue, distributed copies (continued) of a letter from his client, Bay Ridge Development, Inc., 4211 200th St. SW Citizen Comment: Bay #205, Lynnwood, requesting review of the Southeast Comprehensive Plan by Ridge Development, Inc. the Planning Commission as a work schedule priority during 1988-1989 to - Southeast consider major changes in the area of Valley Medical Center. Referring to a Comprehensive Plan vicinity map, Mr. Blaylock indicated his opinion that areas designated as appropriate for low density multifamily uses on the plan should be expanded to provide an adequate buffer between the high density medical center and lower density uses to the south. He reported that Bay Ridge has recently obtained 31 acres lying south and east of Valley Medical Center with the intent of developing multifamily residential uses to support medical facilities in the area. However, since the Southeast Comprehensive Plan has not been evaluated since 1980 and massive health care development has occurred in the area, review of the plan is needed to address major issues of traffic, public services, and land use focus. MOVED BY MATHEWS, SECONDED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER COUNCIL REFER THIS MATTER TO THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT FOR RECOMMENDATION BACK TO COUNCIL AS TO WHEN REVIEW OF THE SOUTHEAST COMPREHENSIVE PLAN COULD BE SCHEDULED ON THE LIST OF PLANNING COMMISSION PRIORITIES. Councilman Stredicke referred to State law which requires periodic comprehensive plan review by municipalities and urged that the matter not be postponed. MOTION CARRIED. Rezone: Good Shepherd. Ralph Evans, 3306 NE 11th Place, Renton, referenced a condition contained Group Home (NE 19th in the Hearing Examiner's recommendation on Good Shepherd rezone,,File Street), R-010-88 s No. R-010-88, for development of a group home on Shelton Avenue NE. Citing a 1982 court case in which zoning reversions without public hearing were found to be null and void, Mr. Evans questioned Condition #3 requiring execution of restrictive covenants to assure that zoning on the site would revert from R-1 to its prior G-1 classification if development of the specified use does not occur within one year. City Attorney Warren preferred that restrictive covenants specify that zoning on the site shall be reconsidered by the City Council if development does not occur within the specified time period. For.use- By City Clerk's Office Only A. I . # 7 AGENDA ITEM • RENTON CITY COUNCIL MEETING SUBMITTING Dept./Div./Bd./Comm. City Clerk For Agenda Of August 15, 1988 (Meeting Date) Staff Contact Maxine E. Motor (Name) Agenda Status: SUBJECT: Appeal of Hearing Examiner's Consent XXX Recommendation on Good Shepherd of Public Hearing Correspondence Washington Rezone and Conditional Use Ordinance/Resolution Permit, File No. R-010-RR and CU-010-88 Old Business Exhibits: (Legal Descr. , Maps, Etc. )Attach New Business Study Session A. City Clerk's letter Other B. Letter of Appeal • C. Approval : Hearing Examiner's Report, 7/1.5/88 Legal Dept. Yes No N/A COUNCIL ACTION RECOMMENDED: Refer to Finance Dept. Yes No. N/A Planning and Development Committee Other Clearance FISCAL. IMPACT: Expenditure Required $ Amount $ Appropriation- •$ Budgeted Transfer Required SUMMARY (Background information, prior action and effect of implementation) (Attach additional pages if necessary.) Appeal filed by Darlene Lang, representing Ed Stanley for Good Shepherd of Washington, accompanied by the required fee received on August 9, 1988. PARTIES OF RECORD/INTERESTED CITIZENS TO BE CONTACTED: • SUBMIT THIS COPY TO CITY CLERK BY NOON ON THURSDAY WITH DOCUMENTATION. • • • CITY OF RENTON No 28137 FINANCE DEPARTMENT i RENTON, WASHINGTON 98055 ) 9 19 21 RECEIVED OF1:7---4-9-ei > '2 6 )g - 010 — g , C u -/0 - .. ..__..--- AUG 9 '1988 . Received by 4/L. f4 TOTAL • • • • • • • • • ti WRITTEN APPEAL OF HEARING EXAMINER'S DECISION/RECOMMENDATION TO RENTON CITY COUNCIL. APPLICATION NAME: FILE NO. R-010-88 and CU-010-88 Good Shepherd of Washington The undersigned interested party hereby files its Notice of Appeal from the Decision or Recommendation of the Land Use Hearing Examiner, dated Ju 1 y 15 19 88 1 . IDENTIFICATION OF PARTY APPELLANT: REPRESENTATIVE (IF ANY) : Ed Stanley Darlene Lang Name: Name: Address: 18940 Marine View Drive Addres�s751 South 172nd Place Seattle, Washington 98166 Seattle , Washington 98188 Telephone No. 243-2895 Telephone No. 243-7044 2. SPECIFICATION OF ERRORS (Attach additional sheets if necessary) Set forth below are the specific errors or law or fact upon which this appeal is based: FINDINGS OF FACT: (Please designate number as denoted • in the Examiner's Report) No. Error: arr Pa-r9 rnN Correction: MG` 8 19,88 [AC CITY CLEM'S OFFIC—E1 O CONCLUSIONS: mz L-goMm� No. Error: Correction: • OTHER: Decision: Conditional Use Permit is approved subject to the No. 4 • Error: following conditions : Fully automatic irrigation must be insLalled . Correction• Please see attachment . 3. SUMMARY OF ACTION REQUESTED: The City Council is requested to grant the following relief: (Attach explanation, if desired) Reverse the Decision or Recommendation and grant the following relief: XModify the Decision or Recommendation as follows: Please see attachment . Remand to the Examiner for further consideration as follows : - Other: Wir ellant/Represe tative Signature Date NOTE: Please refer to Title IV, Chapter 30 of the Renton Municipal Code, and Sections 4-3016 and 4-3017, specifically (see reverse side of page) for specific appeal procedures. APPLICATION Page - 2 2 . SPECIFICATION OF ERRORS . Correction: Recommendaton #2 states that the execution of restrictive covenants which require that in all respects the limitations on the property shall be those of the R-1 zoning code. Therefore, the requirement of the installation of a fully automatic irrigation system, which is a requirement for commercial development is not appropriate for this development . 3 . SUMMARY OF ACTION REQUESTED. Please rescind the requirement of the installation of a fully automatic irrigation system. CITY OF RENTON mu. FINANCE DEPARTMENT • Earl Clymer, Mayor Maxine E. Motor, City Clerk August 11, 1988 APPEAL FILED BY DARLENE LANG, REPRESENTING ED STANLEY RE: Appeal of Hearing Examiner's recommendation, dated July 15, 1988, rezone and conditional use permit for Good Shepherd of Washington, R-010-88 and CU-010-88. To Parties of Record: Pursuant to Title IV, Chapter 30, City Code, written appeal of Hearing Examiner's recommendation has been filed with the City Clerk, along with the proper fee of $75.00. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the written appeal and other pertinent documents will be reviewed by the Council's Planning and Development Committee and will be considered by the City Council when the matter is reported out of Committee. The Council Secretary will notify all parties of record of the date and time of the Planning and Development Committee meeting. If you are not listed in local telephone directories and wish to attend the meeting, please call the Council Secretary at 235-2586 any weekday after 1:00 p.m. for information. Sincerely, CITY OF RENTON • Maxine E. Motor, CMC City Clerk 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206),235-2501 July 15, 1988 OFFICE OF THE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION APPLICANT: - GOOD SHEPHERD OF WASHINGTON File No: R-010-88 and CU-010-88 • LOCATION: , 3900 block of N.E. 19th Street. Located on the south side of N.E. 19th Street, east of Shelton Avenue N.E. and west of Union Avenue N.E. SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Rezone of property from R-1 to G-1 to develop the site with a group home for six developmentally disabled adults through a Conditional Use Permit. SUMMARY OF ACTION: Building and Zoning Department Recommendation: Approval with conditions. BUILDING & ZONING The Building & Zoning Department Report was DEPARTMENT REPORT: received by the Examiner on June 28, 1988 PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Building and Zoning Department Report, examining available information on file with the application, and field checking the property and surrounding area, the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: MINUTES • The hearing was opened on July 5, 1988 at 9:30 A.M. in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. The following exhibits were entered into the record: Exhibit #1 - Yellow File containing application, proof of posting and publication and other documentation pertinent to this request. Exhibit #2�:=. Vicinity Map Exhibit #3 - Site Plan Exhibit #4 - Landscape Plan Exhibit #5 - Elevation Plan Exhibit #6 - Letters of Support for Good Shepherd Home in Issaquah. Exhibit #7 - Letters of Support for Good Shepherd Home proposed for 19th and Union. Exhibit #8 - Three (3) pictures showing architecture and design of other Good Shepherd Homes in various locations. The hearing opened with a presentation of the staff report by Lenora Blauman, Assistant Planner. In her review she stated the site is a .847 acre vacant site the applicant wishes to rezone from R-1 to G-1; the ERC review prompted conditions to be placed on the property as to design review, landscape plans, approval of hours of operation and a bond to ensure the city roadways will be kept clean during construction. In 1982, the zoning map was revised and the present R-1 designation was applied to the property; the subject site is part of the Northeast Renton Area Plan and there is no proof that this parcel was considered for reclassification at that time. The zoning permitted under the Comprehensive Plan for this property is for single family residential development which would include R-1 as well as G-1; the group home being proposed would be acceptable under the G-1 development standards, and staff is recommending Good Shepherd of Washington R-010-88 and CU-010-88 July 15, 1988 Page.2 if the rezoning is granted that a Restrictive Covenant be placed on the property to limit uses permitted on the site to a group home. If the home is not developed then the property will revert to the R-1 zoning. The Examiner questioned if the location of the home could be moved on the property in case this proposal should dissolve, then the lot could be legally divided into possibly 3 single family lots. Staff agreed to check into this matter. bMs. Blauman continued reviewing the public utilities to the site and noted no impact is expected from this development; she reviewed the request for a Conditional Use Permit. After evaluating lithe criteria for this request it was noted this is a single family styled home for 6 developmentally disabled adults between the ages of 21 and 40, with no major medical problems,,' who are not mentally ill and have no criminal background; proposed development is consistent with residential policies and will be designed to be compatible with the residential character of ' the neighborhood; the home and surrounding amenities will enhance the property and local community; and this is the first home of this type to be located within the City. Blauman stated it is felt there is a need for this type of home in the community as it has been determined there are more than 500 persons within the city in need of this type of housing; the home will be approximately 2528 sq. ft.; fencing and landscaping will be provided; there will be outdoor parking for 4 vehicles with provisions for a van to be used to transport the occupants to work 'and recreation, with no residents of the home driving. It is estimated there will be 12 vehicle trips daily; there will be no excess noise from the site with measures such as fencing entirely around the property 4 ft - 6 ft. high and extra landscaping to be used to buffer any noise or extra light or glare from the site. Planner Blauman requested approval of this Conditional Use Permit and Rezone request subject to the conditions set out by staff in their report to the Examiner. Support from City staff was received from John Morris of the Housing and Community ' Development Department who set out how the money is allocated from H&CD through the Block Grant Program and how it relates to this proposal. He pointed out as a part of this process there is a Citizens Advisory Committee which has been active since the early 1970's; reviewed the procedure from submittal of an application to it's review and subsequent hearing stage. Mr. ,1 Morris reviewed some of the issues considered by his'department before recommending an Y ):application of this nature such as whether or not the project is consistent with locally adopted j'plans and standards which include compliance with the City's Comprehensive Plan, H&CD Policies and County policies that may be relevant, as well as the opportunity for all residents to obtain sound housing. Letters of support from residents in close proximity to the proposed home were offered into the record. Morris reviewed the King County policies to be considered for this type of project and noted there is a documented need for this type of housing, feels this project will provide for these needs with low cost housing in a home-like setting; the Block Grant money is earmarked just for Renton and it is felt the citizens will be served with this proposal as they will be given priority, and this project addresses a significant health and safety issue for low income people. There will be 24-hour care in a home-like environment; and it was pointed out that this proposal is a strong partnership between governmental and private agencies with the availability and commitment of matching funds now documented. In closing Mr. Morris stated the agencies involved all believe Good Shepherd is reliable and capable of seeing this project through to its end. He asked the Examiner's approval of this request as presented. Testifying in support of the proposal on behalf of the applicant was Ed Stanley, 18940 Marine View Drive S.W., Seattle, 98166. Mr. Stanley thanked staff for their support of the project; noted the residents will be in day programs and will be gone from the home from approximately 9:00 , A.M. to 3:00 P.M., Monday through Friday. They will have no behavior problems; will be Iiinvolved in 3 programs provided by King County (according to their capabilities); there will be 'paid professional staff trained in many levels of care; there will be approximately 8-1/4 persons at this home with the 1/4 person being the individual responsible for the 4 homes that will be located throughout'King County.. Stanley reviewed the programs and numbers that will be involved in all of the proposed King County Good Shepherd Homes. He said there will be 2 ,!staff members in the home during the day, one at night, and 3 during shift changes. In closing 'Mr. Stanley noted Good Shepherd has been providing these types of services for over 30 years, '4 serving over 700 developmentally disabled persons, and stated Good Shepherd looks forward to their project in Renton and assured the Examiner they will make every effort to be the very best ',of neighbors and friends. Responding in support of this proposal was Darlene Lang, 4751 So. 172nd Place, Seattle, 98188, Corporate Secretary for Good Shepherd of Washington. She advised the Examiner this is a non- , profit organization; stated this site was selected due to the availability of sewers, the home is readily accessible to shopping, medical services and medical care as well as recreational facilities,) transportation; the home must be located in a residential community with a level lot that will accommodate a rambler-type home. She stated they will be good neighbors and presented Exhibits 6 and 7 showing support for their organization located in Issaquah and the proposed 19th and Union home. Good Shepherd of Washington R-010-88 and CU-010-88 July 15, 1988 Page 3 Support was also shown by John Caruso. architect. 137-1/2 Park Lane, Kirkland, Washington who stated the applicant will meet all mitigated requirements by the ERC, does'not feel there is a need for additional parking noting the other homes in the neighborhood are•not required to have 4 or more parking spaces; noise levels will be minimized with the use of special wall construction inside this home as well as the fact it is not felt there will be any more noise from the occupants of this home than would be found in a average household. Mr. Caruso did not feel the suggestion to possibly relocate the building on the lot was a good idea. He said there is no way this project could be defunct and anyone could buy the house as a single family home as it is specially constructed for this particular use. Mr. Caruso presented photos showing the Issaquah and Bellevue Group Homes and the way these homes have been designed, landscaped and generally maintained to show they are aesthetically agreeable with the surrounding neighborhood. Pat Holmes. 4621 South 164th Street, Seattle, 98188 supported this proposal stating she is a neighbor of the home in the McMicken Heights area and feels Good Shepherd Home has'been a good neighbor and created no problems for the neighborhood. Cathy Hawley of 1717 Union Avenue N.E. Renton 98056 supported the proposal stating she is a neighbor directly to the south of this property. She has a family member who is developmentally handicapped and supports the need for this type of home; her experience with the handicapped has always been very positive and she is looking forward to having Good Shepherd as a neighbor. Joann Hart 6511 So. 153rd Street, Seattle 98188 spoke in support stating she is a parent and guardian of a handicapped daughter. She stated she understands the need for this type of home and the support and,family-like atmosphere they provide. She relayed her experience with not only her daughter but others with the same disability and feels if neighbors take the time to get to know the patrons of these types of facilities, as well as staff, they will find it to be a very rewarding experience as well as helping to alleviate some of their fears about the handicapped and their living habits. She would welcome Good Shepherd to her neighborhood. Closing support testimony was received from'Gene Lux, 10850 Dixon Drive South, Seattle, 98178. ' Mr. Lux was in the Legislature when legislation was passed for the operational funding for this type of facility. This Bill went through numerous hearings and it was obvious by the legislative vote that this is the most cost effect and humane way to deal with this problem. He said as a builder he has had many experiences with various kinds of home buyers including those with children who were,not disciplined and caused great damage to personal property as well as the surrounding neighborhood, noting those circumstances will not occur with this facility. Mr. Lux stated he feels the people who are apprehensive about this type of facility will be very pleased with the environment the home will bring to the neighborhood. It will be established and have a staff person on duty_24 hours a day. He expressed his support for this project. . The Examiner called for further testimony regarding this project. There was no one else wishing to speak, and no further comments from staff. The hearing closed at 11:00 A.M. FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & DECISION: Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: 1. The applicant, Good Shepherd of Washington, filed a request for approval of a rezone of approximately .847 acres of property from R-1 (Single Family; Lot size - 7,200 sq ft) to G- 1 (Single Family; Minimum Lot Size - 35,000 sq ft) together with a Conditional Use Permit to establish a group home for developmentally disabled adults. 2. The yellow file containing the staff report, the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) documentation and other pertinent materials was entered into the record as Exhibit #1. 3. The Environmental Review Committee (ERC), the City's responsible official issued a Declaration of Non-Significance - Mitigated (DNS-M) for the subject proposal. 4. The subject proposal was reviewed by all departments with an interest,in the matter. 5. There was no opposition from the public regarding the subject site. 6. The subject site is located on the south side of the 3900 block of N.E. 19th Street, between Union Avenue N.E. on the east and Shelton Avenue N.E. on the west. Good Shepherd of Washington R-010-88 and CU-010-88 July 15, 1988 Page 4 • 7. The City Council annexed the subject site to the city with the adoption of Ordinance 2472, enacted in March, 1969. The site was reclassified to its current R-1, zoning with a consolidation of residential zoning districts enacted by the City Council in June, 1982 (Ordinance 3634). Ij8. . A lot line adjustment was approved in May, 1984 and a short plat was approved in August, 1985. A request that the off-site improvements be waived was denied when the short plat was approved. �9. The map element of the Comprehensive Plan designates the area in which the subject site is located as suitable for, the development of single family uses, but does not mandate such development without consideration of other policies of the plan. 10. The subject site is a relatively level, vacant parcel. The area around it is developed primarily with single family homes. The lots in the area vary in size from the more standard 7,200 square foot to larger lots, similar in size to the subject site's 36,895 square, feet. The site is covered with heavy vegetation, although most'of it is weed species. 11. Water and sewer lines and a storm culvert are located along N.E. 19th Street in front of the subject site. 12. Metro Transit runs bus lines along Union Avenue just east of the site. 13. A small shopping center is located just southeast of the site at Union and N.E. Sunset Boulevard. Additional shopping opportunities are located east and west of the site along Sunset. - f 14. The applicant proposes reclassifying the subject site from its current zoning. of R-1 to G,=1 in order to facilitate the construction and establishment of a group home on the site. The current zoning does not permit group homes whereas the proposed zoning, the G-1, permits the establishment of group homes by Conditional Use Permit. 15. The home would serve six (6) developmentally disabled adults as a full-time residence. The disabilities would vary and some could be wheelchair bound. At the time of admission, residents can vary in age from 21 to 40 years old. There is no maximum age limit for residents. None of the residents would be mentally ill or have criminal backgrounds. 16. The intent would be to integrate these people into the community where they can work, shop, play and simply reside in an ordinary, or close to ordinary, residential environment 17. Based upon these objectives and standards required by a variety of funding sources, including federal, state, local grant funds and private sources, the applicant chose the site. The site serves some prime objectives. It is in the midst of a single family neighborhood' with public transit located down the block. It is just north of a small shopping center with additional shopping close by. In addition, HUD, one of the fund sources, requires such homes to be served by sewers. Renton provides sewers in this area. 18. The home will be a single family home one story or approximately 16 feet in height. The maximum height permitted in the zone is 35 feet. The home will be 2,528 square feet. The home will be set back 30 feet from the street. There will be a setback of approximately 70 feet from the east property line, approximately 105 feet from the west property line and a rear yard setback of approximately 70 feet. '.19. The home will be served by four (4) parking stalls along the east side of the home. The driveway serving the parking area will be seventeen and a half (17.5) feet from the eastern property line. This area will be screened by larger trees and other ornamental landscaping, and it will be fenced. The property will be fenced on all sides. A four foot high fence will be provided along the front property line, with six foot fences located along the remaining perimeter of the site. The required side yards are five feet. The minimum required eq red front yard is 20 feet, while the minimum rear yard is 30 feet. 20. While lot coverage in the G-1 zone is permitted to be fifteen percent (15%), the home will cover not more than seven (7%) of the site. For comparison purposes staff also calculated that the home would be well below the fifty (50%) lot coverage of the existing R-1 zone; even if the home were situated on a 7,200 square foot lot. ' I • " I� • • Good Shepherd of Washington R-010-88 and CU-010-88 July 15, 1988 • • Page 5 21. The estimated traffic which the proposed use will generate is approximately 12 trips per day distributed over staff arrivals, visitors, outings, and service providers. A single family home usually generates approximately 10 trips per day. Residents will not drive. Staff anticipates that the four parking stalls proposed will provide sufficient parking for the needs of the home without unnecessarily converting areas which would otherwise be landscaping to asphalt parking stalls. 22. The home will be staffed by a professional staff of four and will be staffed 24 hours per day. There will be an average of two staff members on duty during the day; one member during the sleeping hours;.and one during shift changes. The anticipated population would equal approximately 6.25 adults. 23. : The staff will provide certain skills to assist in integrating the residents into the community. Staff will provide among other functions, a living skills instructor, a resident training instructor, staff supervisor, and rehabilitation coordinator. 24. The applicant, Good Shepherd of Washington and its associated organization has operated for over 30 years, providing similar services to approximately 700 people in 40 facilities. 25. The residents will be employed in a variety of programs in the surrounding community. Workshops, sheltered work shops and other opportunities and services are located at RVTI, and also in the cities of Issaquah, Kent, and Factoria. Medical services, if necessary, are found at Valley Medical Center and Overlake Hospital. 26. A number of persons other than the applicant and city staff testified to the need for such facilities. An immediate neighbor testified in support of the proposal, as did others members of the community. A neighbor of an existing group home testified that the home was not intrusive and was not unlike other residences in that neighborhood, and presented no particular problems. CONCLUSIONS Rezone 1. The proponent of a rezone must demonstrate that the request is in the public interest, that it will not impair the public health, safety and welfare and in addition, complies with at least one of the criteria found in Section 4-3010, which provides in part that: a. The subject site has not been considered in a previous area-wide rezone or land use analysis; or b. The subject site is potentially designated for the new classification per the Comprehensive Plan; or c. There has been a material and substantial change in the area in which the subject site is located since the last rezoning of the property or area. The requested classification is justified and should be approved by the City Council. 2. While the request is somewhat unusual it is not inappropriate. Normally requests are to modify the zoning to allow a more intensive use of property. For example, applicants usually petition to reclassify property from G-1 to R-1 to allow approximately 4 homes on approximately 35,000 square feet. Here, we have an applicant petitioning to lessen the activity permitted on a site. Four single family homes on the site would generate a population of approximately 10 persons and generate approximately 40 daily vehicle trips. The proposal would result in a population of from 6 to 10 people with traffic of approximately 12 trips per day. In addition, less of the lot would be dedicated to structures, parking and driveways. • . . 3. The site has not been considered for reclassification since annexation. The 1982 change was merely a consolidation of zoning districts with no particular parcel by parcel analysis. That consolidation and the proposed change both support the objective of the Comprehensive Plan which designates the area in which the site is located for single family uses. G-1 zoning is a suitable district for single family development compatible with the Comprehensive Plan. 4. Since the applicant's ultimate objective, the establishment of a group home for developmentally disabled adults, is not incompatible with the Comprehensive Plan, the request is timely. The home may only be permitted on property zoned G-1 and review at • Good Shepherd of Washington R=010-88 and CU-010-88 July 15, 1988 !; Page 6 this time is appropriate. The facts and circumstances which demonstrate an absence of such facilities in the City of Renton provide justification for studying this issue. 5. Since the request is not incompatible with the area, may result in less dense development; less impermeable surface and less traffic, the City Council should approve the • reclassification as requested. Conditional Use Permit 6. , The applicant for a Conditional Use Permit must demonstrate that the use is in the public interest, will not impair the health, safety or welfare of the general public and is in compliance with the criteria found in Section 4-748(C) which provides in part that: a. The proposal generally conforms with the Comprehensive Plan; b. There is'a general community need for the proposed use at the proposed location; c. There will be no undue impacts on adjacent property; d. The proposed use is compatible in scale with the adjacent residential uses, if any; e. Parking, unless otherwise permitted, will not occur in the required yards; f. Traffic and pedestrian circulation will be safe and adequate for the proposed project; 1 g. Noise, light and glare will not cause an adverse affect on neighboring property; h. Landscaping shall be sufficient to buffer the use from rights-of-way and • neighboring property where appropriate; and '' i. Adequate public services are available to serve the proposal. The requested conditional use appears justified. 7. The use is a modified form of a residential use which is compatible with the r' Comprehensive Plan. The use will be entirely contained within a structure which gives all external appearances of being an ordinary single family homer The size, approximately 2,800 square feet, is not atypical, especially when located on a larger single, family lot. 8. The applicant and the Housing and Community Development division of the City both indicated that there are few similar facilities in the area, and none currently within the City limits. The overall need greatly outstrips the supply of residential facilities for the developmentally disabled adult population, and this home for six members of. that population would meet only a small fraction of the need. It has been mandated by courts and suggested by doctors that these persons not be institutionalized. Rather, it has been' suggested their care be provided in ordinary community settings. - 9. The second component of community need is whether the subject site or proposed location is appropriate. The applicant sought a larger lot to accommodate the group home which would also be near services such as shopping, transit lines, sewers, and employment and • medical services. The site chosen appears•appropriate from that stand point. A larger home will not be out of character with the surrounding homes nor will the larger home overpower the lot. 110. While the applicant does not expect the residents to create any untoward impacts on the community, the population is equivalent to a slightly larger than usual family unit. Larger families can have more impact than a typical family of four. Therefore, the applicant has selected the larger lot. Similarly, City Code recognizes the potential affects[ of such uses and requires group homes to be located on these larger lots in the G-1 • district. Again, while not particularly discriminating against larger family units, it is a recognized fact that larger families generally have greater impacts. The site selected f appears suitable for the group home, especially in light of the additional landscaping and setbacks which will be provided. 11. The home, as proposed, does not appear to have any potential to create any undue impacts on surrounding homes. The site will be well landscaped and fenced. Parking for four cars should minimize any off-site impacts, although on-street parking is available, as it is Good Shepherd of Washington R-010-88 and CU-010-88 July 15, 1988 Page 7 to any home, for the occasional party or special event. The four stalls appear to provide a good compromise between parking and asphalt. After all, the home is intended to provide a home-like setting not an institutional setting. 12. The home has been estimated to generate approximately 11 to 12 vehicle trips per day, just two (2) more trips than the typical single family home. Traffic obviously will not create any undue impacts on the neighborhood. ' 13. The single family home will be approximately 2,800 square feet in area. The home has been designed to resemble a rambler from the street. The one floor home will not block views, nor will it create shading or shadow effects on surrounding properties. The home is also;designed to provide easy access for the developmentally disable residents and to provide easy maneuverability for staff in serving the residents. The home is not unlike others in the immediate neighborhood both as to scale and lot size. Actually, one of the primary differences will be that mandatory landscaping and landscaping upkeep will be required, whereas for ordinary single family homes such matters are left to the discretion • of the homeowner. 14. As specified above, the home will provide four parking spaces located to the east of the home but still 20 feet from the property line. Landscaped screening and a fence will provide separation between the parking area, driveway, and adjacent lot. Parking and associated impacts such as headlight glare and engine noise should not create any impacts on the adjacent property. 15. The plans do not reveal any potential problems with either pedestrian or vehicle circulation.. Again, the proposed use is equivalent to a single family home in most particulars and impacts in this area such as circulation, should be minimal. 16. The home will be constructed with noise attenuation built in. The home will utilize thicker walls and completely insulated windows.- The fencing and landscaping will help to contain noise, if any, on site and will also minimize any potential light or glare problems. 17. The various setbacks described will be landscaped with a variety of materials. The entire site, with the exception of the building pad and driveway/parking lot, will be planted with lawn grass. The entire perimeter of the site will contain larger plants including Black pine, Deodora cedar, Pin oak, Flowering cherry and Red maple trees. The applicant also proposes planting fruit trees on the site with a variety of bushes and scrubs gracing the site. The areas immediately adjacent to the home will also be landscaped. 18. The site is served by water and sewer lines. The applicant will provide off-site improvements as required by the Building Code. The proposed development does not appear likely to burden the utility infrastructure. 19, In conclusion, the proposed group home for six developmentally disabled adults appears to be a use which will not adversely affect the general public health, safety or welfare nor does it appear to be a use which will adversely affect the residential amenities of the immediate community. It will be staffed by professionals and operated by an organization which has been successful with similar homes elsewhere both in the State and along the west coast. Immediate neighbors, community residents and neighbors of similar homes expressed support for the home and suggested that such a use did not, and would not impair their properties. Since the group home will not adversely affect the community,, and there is a demonstrated need for such uses, the Conditional Use Permit will be approved, subject to approval of the Rezone by the City Council. RECOMMENDATION • The City Council should prove the reclassification of the subject site from R-1 to G-1 subject to the following conditions: ' 1. The execution of restrictive covenants which require that the property shall be used for a group home for not more than six (6) developmentally disabled adults. 2. • The execution of restrictive covenants which require that in all other respects the use limitations on the property shall be those of the R-1 zoning code. Good Shepherd of Washington R-010-88 and CU-010-88 July 15, 1988 Page 8 3. The execution of restrictive covenants which state that the failure to develop the property according to the terms of the Conditional Use Permit within one year, on to otherwise abandon the specific Conditional Use Permit or discontinue this group home for any reason, shall cause the property to revert to its prior R-1 zoning classification. 1 DECISION The Conditional Use Permit is approved subject to the following conditions: 1 1. The City Council approve the reclassification of the subject site from R-1 to G-1! iJ f 2. The conditions imposed by the ERC are fully complied with by the applicant. 3.- The group home shall be limited to a population of not more than six (6) developmentally disabled adults. • 4. That all landscaping be subject to approval of the City's landscape architect, and that a fully automatic system of irrigation be installed to assure the continued survival of the landscaping. The applicant shall also be required to maintain the landscaping on a regular basis to assure it remains neat. Said landscaping shall be subject to approval by the City's landscape architect. The applicant develop the home as represented on Exhibits 3,, 4 and 5 with no substantial modifications, and that the structural details presented in the application be fully complied with regarding wall thickness, insulation and sound proofing, etc. ORDERED THIS 15th day of July, 1988. 'FRED J. KAUFMAN HEARING EXAMINER TRANSMITTED THIS 15th day of July, 1988 to the parties of record: John Morris City of Renton Department of Housing and Community Development Ed Stanley 18940 Marine View Drive, S.W. Seattle, WA. 98166 . f Darlene Lang 4751 So. 172nd Place Seattle, WA. 98188 John Caruso, Architect - 137-1/2 Park Lane Kirkland, Washington • Pat Holmes 4621 South 164th S.E. Seattle, Washington 98188 Cathy Hawley ' 1717 Union Avenue N.E. _ Renton, WA. 98056 Joann Hart 6511 So. 153rd Street Seattle, WA. 98188 - 1i Gene Lux `� 10850 Dixon South Seattle, WA. 98178 Good Shepherd of Washington R-010-88 and CU-010-88 " July 15, 1988 Page 9 • TRANSMITTED THIS 15th day of July, 1988 to the following: Mayor Earl Clymer ' Councilman Richard M. Stredicke Don Erickson, Zoning Administrator Richard Houghton, Public Works Director Members; Renton Planning Commission. Larry M. Springer, Policy Development Director Glen Gordon, Fire Marshal Ronald Nelson, Building & Zoning Director Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney John Adamson, Developmental Program Coordinator Gary Norris, Traffic Engineer Renton Record-Chronicle Pursuant to Title IV, Section 3015 of the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in-writing on ,or before 5:00 P.M. July 29, 1988. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for a review by the Examiner within fourteen (14) days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific errors relied upon by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record, take further action as he deems proper. An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Section 3016, which requires that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk, accompanying a filing fee of $75.00 and meeting other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection or purchase in the Finance Department, first floor of City Hall. The Appearance of Fairness Doctrine provides that no ex parte (private one-on-one) communications may occur concerning pending land use decisions. This means that parties to a land use decision may not communicate in private with any decision-maker concerning the proposal. Decision-makers in the land use process include both the Hearing Examiner and members of the City Council. All communications concerning the proposal must be made in public. This public communication permits all interested parties to know the contents of the communication and would allow them to openly rebut the evidence. Any violation of this doctrine would result in the invalidation of the request by the Court. The Doctrine applies not only to the initial public hearing but to all Requests for Reconsideration as well as Appeals to the City Council. U 7G F .• s' k ;:;.• • 1r • • .S RENTON ORG7. .1070 a ,. .' Alte150PL /0t7T____7c,..57 .12, ._ 405.9/ ;,;.,, _ •• RENDwor �ENro y n CRja.241/ ..,....., 2... . ,e•Ar4.:. ,,, o 130 9i 8 . ,.. .. tie .. `•. • V. 1, E` ti; I °o�� Z / •� Q S 2 u y°ZI 1/g O ,. 1 C Q� !/B !oo '��. N • �G q -�?LN.NZZR��Ih� I • • y O O• •�• 2 .° t', 9� . plc. a • 1. o , �_ O o•1� . 5° • .. a' . . eira)..... • ..1; .. .0. to • • Fts_.••• , •1. r• -g-2-49� </307:V2 >h 305.B/ 283 ,.. ....,.: „.:.. .. „... . ,H.o�• (V • s .R • .I'• 1 " , E 1yPc n a' .Y, n' S I'• i t.,.:i i2s':1, ',:paK.,a =. . -• a;', ; ' • • 0 0 go :� Ay,ct7 TWO tMSY 'lief.' r • ? I`11 /2f 00g -•6'N# JZir-�, 'B•/44• w t,...--`r,w„. ; :14.32' _ t '; O �.. 23 ' 4.5. o o• ��jl s ' ' � /2oc/72 = J`O O� r OI K1" Q Ol OK�O :I. 00?D ,_co \_` 30 Q • H ti B9• Zi•SYAv.g RI . 6 e Z", /24! uc o Ni • 4 \.\o. 2 - of /7 el P�' 8p a tiu A H k :' 01/0 ,, S 'yg9./4 \ 'JzI�V • �\ B 1 •O , - e;o.Y;^��{ '' . OOSO ' ...lq d 22 ; ' •1 V / r16 /�6 Q ^ k4 7.....711;73 Q g y .....,.. " ,'�-J 'v� :,-,;'CM1`r�st;.•. • /09.Gg , �; 0 Co./�!( No `• Q 0 •,��O 1 p �'' I 4 .i' 'ti:ri 1 1416 5 • . r•69� 107T - . . ,20 ;.::. ..::. • :..J•� r V 9+c �r [� evy. _�. •27 • 4 . t°F.. 0130 30 \`.' ,L „gin a' ,.. 19 • lk[r, .r e 1,6 ,tipl::•.. 1. . N'.s,,ii.;,: ' V st 9z> _ •�• ! .. • 6ti9 n v•-aolY ao �'E/ • '• :! :}F,..C ; 1309.2 s o!e n �q• •z µ �. :,' ;"tr,.:; , .til ,.:1. l: j (,..•,.":•', All.. •4(/`11rs.,t0 230 32�y ��� " i I•F z.y. ,�i: 'i:k..�, iK In T r 9 7 1:. ,; L. tRly q ; { 7�/Z —-- • R'9 •`. " ''� f ''i.�yy `:'' • t1 .r' c'/o!SDi,Xr17i • • • Z i —� �1 2 5 99 8 5 • ',lid ,. .:�'. ,. Z �:' ` '�.`�•y )R I ow .,mow "_<. ,.., _, . .:., ESTBROOK1 TOWNHOUSES :,�Jtt .r;; r ,;. ,:1 PHASE I • I VOL. 41/20- 26 ;' : m :40Ili:'; . ar.;; :; PHASE 2 - 9 :,.i' ; ';:•;a �.. '*"..--.,:: ,1.;,,, '._ .dBB•Cg-4oI1/ 2S 1• r t::It� :4'l:#'}'i;,q • VOL.42/79 80 �o tri:,,,1,.if•q 2 s ' tv t"' • • • • • GROU'IID i TREES SHRUBS COVERS • • LAwf 1 0 0 0 O t p it1 SI-IELTON AVENUE NE. C ui.lw WWI w��vtn . i 1 1111 iill .1 . • a ; 8 � ;; ; i s I 1 I , : ? i el - • 81 it i I, / / mg lx11 i i II i Y Y Y T • . • \i• : !, . 1 . , , i 1 \—t— —��— — — III . • 81 \ ' I. I I j • 7i.\\ �\ Ilk jj 1�j I • I j� e 13 ,\ \`1 ` 1 gll 1 i '\_ye offal \ c I/I ,I; 1;1 • jE I \ it • ; I I I 'I 'Lill \\ l'------ -1 // 1 iliIiI11,1 i 1 _ I I I 6 off, 8 171 II 1 - -'- �\ II /►/ . n I I I II i ; 1' . ckd o4Ati 5 1 I ( - \\ \\—�! / °�°"I-t-iij'I 1l�it C Ni 4 �C a it �\ t 1 I�'11I1 I f ro c AV4,° ii I , g _•nnr;-ol-� rII� I vit rt.e I I y{x y y\ L 1 $I I Q} --I i N O 1 ` BO°p 6g • II ` i C V ]� li. 1-ili11 11� . d 0 �� ��F` [�, II I\_ S—VI` SJ €I I 0 i I I1\. `J I1_ /� : �ill I • . °, I NJI / 5 'Ig I$I 1IIIIr I .• . . .P0o�eee veevo eve ne.e leevvv i4° Xr L �`'1 1 / /• /' 1 j- J 1 rI I� ,tl�;^ eoeo °pe0 .eoeo ° y A i/ 2. I /I y1I. I .,_ l��F r,-1 - „I..;•=,11_� ��!e 1 a� r°cc'.4� I 61 I II •!I I O / I I • I I •I ie 9 I ! iI I 11 I I I I I I • 11 I I I III { . • j I • •i• I i i i j ig j i j l i i 1 . i j ; 1 j ' •a.••°•.:rfsa.l 10 1 ,1 I I I I I g1z I I 1 . Il , 1,3 • m j i . i J) I iR 1, --------q-------- I I e • UNION AVENUE NE. ' 817E PLAN �w to GOODSHEPHERD Farxher/Canuo&Associates • LANDSCAPE PLAN "'"'"` OF WASHINGTON II • Architects• 2o6/az2�es4 I—' LANDSCAPE SCHEDULE RENTON, WASHINGTON waPALane•Ill+da6ud:gunv°uu ►� 1 , • . • . • , s . • ' . . • ' • .. . • • . . .. .. . . . • • • ' • . • , • . . . • .'• ' . . . • . • •. . . . •• . . . . •. . . .. . • • . , • . . . •. • . ' . • . ' ' . , . • i• . I. . - . • EAOSIIEPURLUIENTON . . • • 1 . . . a . • , . 1 g I .....n.,............. 1 . ' V i •IRPIT Iff_. 1 151 V6`. r el • P• i •oo z I 'Oo ° 0° \., \/ , ,,•a,„.....,. __..........)//i....:„..... . 13V7-4 1 i ig ri c• I -• ---_:_-.:.. e-' ..›_..-• -7.---,--- - --.-"..a ----=g_,-- .... 7 -•, . •• 47 1 ....,- •,:-..„-li aao°00 CTS. ' . • • , '•--. . — " ., 1.1 gti Ai . . . . l'--- -- • P 1 2" i" ' A • 11 0 6 i 4% ' .. , v 2?. .3,ri. We ..-• I. . ......----•----....„.............. 1 . Pg rg' • Il f I. . .i 112 I.i '. • ,t ---.. It • WO '‘...• 6 ; • " 1 :".„ .I i 0 1 0 -•••• . 1 • 1 . _,„„. •.,ti\' P.,./.o .9 e•.. ... , . I • .. .. 1 • • I via•• ..,•%. ...„-„ . ' I . • , '1,.. ,,•1:'• I\--W 1. -*IP 0 Op 0 I p glisl 0 °O v% V Ou P ,t tt z Fi 67. . 6 g 61s L 111 0// 'z• .C, a — ..-,-..._. .. 670 cy, l:'VA.-:4*91) '(' 'P22429,,0:) \ • 1 ... —41/Z.— r. I. iltS aa°°00 11/4))& ' PLANTING ScHEIDULE th --•--741V i GROUND PI, I I 0/ 0 . SHRUGS covERs o 1. .0,;,0 a v. •-a . .400000 ;. r, 6 • 1-,-ft. 1 . . . ' , — Li ....! ' ilill I 1 Ii .41/ X 0 a-CV-0 C41) ..... 1 1 1 i i i 1 't. F.,, 1.2- il 0 liii I i I t,,•lit . • -...;*.s....,,,,6,4... . . g 0 r ' e Eli Qt. 1 • . I At fi• rb.• . • iiu .1 I ' ll i• /o. , i.o..;• 0., ,i it Al/ii, '•.. ..1146:11 2 • , E• 1/IP •\ - 0 ••,, ...----% ----1... 0 _$_,- •-"7- -}, 1 • Ci• : .: ••: , : Y * .pC5 I • \\?....1........ 7 . i I ,......"II , ri 0') \ :o; :, , .. • • 1 •. . , . '• ,.ii 0 a .0; . 1 . 0 fit 1p,c2 cy, •‘ii \\I/P ANit ' w W l'O I l'f g* \I • I . 0 4,,,, ,_ 41\\ /40 ' 411 41, •-:---7-1\E 1 TREES _ 30 La°1 00( I)% ------------------ 1 / i • I • •114.41 W. . I , '. . i i 1 g 8 i • , G y g .. Y .1.r•t:i7.1 t i qi eiN;„....• 1.i.3(,, .1* . ...e}.. t i 1 A R 1 g § i 6 % . ..-- ..f p, • .- 1Z5 . R _ . a 3 '1; ; ; I I 1 73 '' '• .. !.:''.'......''Z'f,o / 10. ii: 0 .0.r ., . . ? 6 liq't 7. E ., h • 7. ,7. 7. 7. 7, .i. -q . , .„. k 1 ,t: 4 k •i ''f 't 4 1 p /.. 1 _, , s'.-- ,,..° g •i !! P ft i e ti i >.--1--- ' F i• 5i IP 1 i i! i N . 11" i 1 FP 1 0 i11 • i . • GOOD SHEPI IERD Emi . LANDSCAPE PLAN Fancher/Caruso&Associates III LANDSCAPE SCHEDULE GROUP HOMES Ha & lib . Architects 206/K22-9854 MO , . . + 1 PLANTING DETAILS N.E.18th ST..FIENTON • irp,Park lam•IGUand Waslivre 914111 11110....... g 113th AVE.SE..KII1G CO. ' . . . . - . ' . . , • • •, . • , • • j ; s BROLLN R SIDING OOF TAN SNG '/'I� • P V C qQ QQ = _nQQ I QQc � oQQ r -- 2 2 NORTH ELEVATION SCALE.Ile••r.c • - Z _ ill I f . I I \ �r ` 4N77PEP dL1.`:Otff GTEp ' � 1 RdR1 LE.:DEiy ( ' 1 ';---•FM FLOOR ELEV. - YU VtlULATNO GLAD,* ANODIZED Altrl. a, / �i 11 Z•-1 EAST ELEVATION scu E,va•••r.o p . az.. w:... xt:H - - �En 0 . r Asti ` C7 0 c1. ---_ :J1 SOUTF4 ELEVATION SCALE:va•.r-o• O . . p . 1r � JPW( = w> XJ Iti . jW W UJEST ELEVATION KALE.va••r-0• • O. inf.. A2 • — ' ..I'.:L...: . I. • - . ', '14 ? Q+r 1, .: » f4-ifT,1 1, ,..r. n i. 1: ,. i; 1; �1 — _ • !�- •' ..1 iii I' •° 1 .71mL ��� ., .r , .. ..,. .. J : ''44 __ • CO n-rr-r I: --1 * til AV 11 • •• • • . • • • 1 It ?,_ •{.At , i . • .: •° ' r 1 . / , 4111!;_lz..., i. K.,.... .,;,..,„„ lio.....„. .....44.,.., ,,..,..,,.. . .:... .,, ..i .. .• ,, 1 • r pi:, ,I , ,� k Id Lode; ;' I,G U_ '•{Y.. , 6045 �� a t♦ • �'2 , r' • 6 '� .0.1 .1 .f ,4 KC. .71. • r • ;;;:•; • .1. • • -•; R-2 I cit-ii .. . .. .,,:.:.:.... 1 .. ..,:.....-.. . :1 . - . . • . ___1---- , . , ,c, .11.7-3 .. ,44=Ls, _ 1 .,,,, , 4 , , . . ... ,.._,. _________---,...- op. . . .:.• .... . . r+ i 1 1 R. 11__ • • . . . ; • • • • • GOOD SHEPHERD GROUP HOME FOR THE DEVELOPMENTALLY • DISABLED FILES: R-010-87, CU-010-87 • (REZONE & CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT) ' APPLICANT 2, GOOD SHEPHERD OF WASHINGTON TOTAL AREA 0.847 ACRE j PRINCIPAL ACCESS N.E. 19th STREET . ' . EXISTING ZONING R-1, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL :, EXISTING USE UNDEVELOPED PROPOSED USE SIX (6) RESIDENT GROUP HOME FOR THE DEVELOPMENTALLY DISABLED'] COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN SINGLE FAMILY • COMMENTS PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF N:E. 19th STREET AT THE 3990 BLOCK, BETWEEN UNION AVENUE N.E. AND SHELTON AVENUE N.E. . • 1 • • _I . - /� • • . 't$ CITY OF RENTON• ••LL ' ' LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER Earl Clymer, Mayor Fred J. Kaufman July 26, 1988 Ed Stanley, President Good Shepherd.of Washington 18940 Marine View Drive S.W. Seattle, Washington 98166 Re: Request for Reconsideration File R-010-88 and CU-010-88 Dear Mr. Stanley: I have reviewed your request for reconsideration in the above entitled matter and my response follows. While I understand your concerns regarding the irrigation system, you must understand that the City must assure that the subject site will be maintained and that the landscaping efforts intended to integrate the home into the community succeed. The landscaping was not only intended as an aesthetic requirement but was primarily intended to screen and buffer the surrounding single family homes from what could be an intrusive use. While the decision found the home would be acceptable, it was viewed as such with a full complement of landscaping. materials which would be maintained on the site. If you have any additional concerns you may again contact this office. If you are not satisfied with the decision you may appeal the decision to the City Council within fourteen (14) days of this decision by filing the appropriate fee of $75.00 with the City Clerk. Sincerely, FRED J. KA FMAN HEARING EXAMINER cc: All Parties of Record' All Parties of Staff - • 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2593 ( (d GOOD SHEPHERD OF WASHINGTON RECEIVE " 18940 MARINE VIEW DR.. SW SEATTLE, WA 98166 Phone 243-2895 JUL 19$$ Judy!' ARINGRREN E ON •City of Renton Office of Hearing Examiner Fred Kaufman, Hearing Examiner . 200 Mill Street Renton, WA 98055 . RE: Report and Recommendation of July 15 , 1988 , Good Shepherd of Washington, File No : R-010-88 and CU-010-88 . Dear Mr. Kaufman: The Report and Recommendation of July 15, 1988 , on the property in the 3900 block of 19th Street is an excellent report in that it covers the facts in great detail and identifies all .the areas of concern. We are in agreement with the report and recommendations , however , we take exception with the Conditional Use Permit , condi- tion #4, that requires the installation of a fully automatic irri- gation system. We request your reconsideration of this item. The landscaping plan as currently shown includes more grass and trees then we initially proposed and upon City insistence we agreed to the plan as shown. Our testimony included the fact that we are committed to maintenance of the site, but did not include the fol- lowing information related to the landscaping which we offer for your consideration: 1 . In an effort to stay within our budget and maintain the most economical maintenance costs , we have selected species of trees which grow_well in the Pacific Northwest without being dependent on artificial irrigation. Cedrus Deodora for example, is frequently planted along freeway where it. grows profusely. The Austrian Black Pine, Red Maple and Fruit Trees also grow extremely well in this area with the rainfall which is common to this area. We would consider substituting other trees , if other trees would be more suitable. There- fore, an irrigation system is not necessary for this purpose. 2. The holding area, which we are providing for surface water management,, will provide water for much of the lawn in the rear of the home. Adding an irrigation system in this area is not necessary and it would not serve a useful purpose, but be a costly expense. 3. The irrigation system is a costly requirement which was not planned for in our budget. The estimated cost to install is approximately $8, 000 plus engineering costs of approximately $2 , 000 for a total cost of $10 , 000 . In addition, the system requires an annual service maintenance, at the cost of $150 , to flush the system out to prevent freezing during the winter months . Our budget is limited . The HUD and Block Grant dol- lars which are funding the development of this project will not cover this item. The HUD 202 Loan Program, Housing for - 2 - 3. (Continued) the Low Income Elderly and the Handicapped, will not fund the water irrigation system, because by any standard this is a luxury item and is only included in the most expensive hous- ing. The system will be used about one or two months a year . and that is not a very efficient use of capital dollars . Under the HUD 202 program these kind of items can only be added with a large cash payment at loan closing that covers installation of the system and includes the maintenance costs for the entire 40 year loan period. This cash payment will equal approximately twice the cost of the irrigation system ($20 ,000) . 4. This home is designed in every way to be as close to a family home as possible. We wish to convey the image of .a single family residence much like any other home in the neighbor- hood. The home will be the permanent home for our residents . The residents may be mentally retarded; however, with staff support would enjoy watering the scrubs , trees and grass and the situation could be used as a learning experience. With the limited dollars available to us we believe our priority must be to spend these dollars on direct support of people. The facilities should include all the necessities of life, but beyond that we risk loosing public confidence if we spend donated dollars on amenities that the general public can not .afford in their own homes . The Good Shepherd organization depends on the general pub- lic support in the form of donations to supplement the programs . Generally, the dollars provided by state funding are not adequate to do the job. A recent study by King County showed that all the- operators of group homes in King County are spending more money for operating the group homes than the state provides . It is with this perspective that we wish you would review the need for the irrigation system and rule that this home can be properly maintained without it. Sincerely, 2:1 / Ed Stanley President ' • cc: Earl Clymer, Mayor Don Erickson, Zoning Administrator Glen Gordon, Fire Marshall Lawrence J Warren, City Attorney ' Gary Norris , Traffic Engineer Richard M. Stredicke, 'Councilman Larry M. Springer, Policy Development Director Ronald Nelson, Building & Zoning Director John Adamson, Development Program Director John Morris , Depart. of Housing and Community Development • GOOD SHEPHERD OF WASHINGTON RECEIVE* 18940 MARINE VIEW DR. SW � SEATTLE, WA 98166 JUL WC"'___ Phone 243-2895 JuicI RI R E�TON R City of Renton Office of Hearing Examiner Fred Kaufman, Hearing Examiner 200 Mill Street. Renton, WA 98055 RE: Report and Recommendation of July 15, 1988, Good Shepherd of Washington, File No: R-010-88 and CU-010-88 . Dear Mr. Kaufman: The. Report and Recommendation of July 15, 1988, on the property in the 3900 block of 19th Street is an excellent report in that it covers the facts in great detail and identifies all the areas of concern. We are in agreement with the report and recommendations, however, we take exception with the Conditional Use Permit, condi- tion #4, that requires the installation of a fully automatic irri- gation system. We request your reconsideration of this item. The landscaping plan as currently shown includes more grass and trees then we initially proposed and upon City insistence we agreed to the plan as shown. Our testimony included the fact that we are committed to maintenance of the site, but did not include the fol- lowing information related to the landscaping which we offer for your consideration: 1 . In an effort to stay within our budget and maintain the most economical maintenance costs , we have selected species of trees which grow well in the Pacific Northwest without being dependent on artificial irrigation. Cedrus Deodora for example, is frequently planted along freeway where it grows profusely. The Austrian Black Pine, Red Maple and Fruit Trees also grow extremely well in this area with the rainfall which is common to this area. We would consider substituting other trees , if other trees would be more suitable. There- fore, an irrigation system is not necessary for this purpose. 2. The holding area, which we are providing for surface water management, will provide water for much of the lawn in the rear of the home. Adding an irrigation system in this area is not necessary and it would not serve a useful purpose, but be a costly expense. 3. The irrigation system is a costly requirement which was not planned for in our budget. The estimated cost to install is approximately $8, 000 plus engineering costs of approximately $2,000 for a total cost of $10 , 000 . In addition, the system requires an annual service maintenance, at the cost of $150 , to flush the system out to prevent freezing during the winter months . Our budget is limited . The HUD and Block Grant dol- lars which are funding the development of this project will not cover this item. The HUD 202 Loan Program, Housing for • • - 2 - 3. (Continued) the Low Income Elderly and the Handicapped, will not fund the water irrigation system, because by any standard this is a luxury item and is only included in the most expensive hous- ing. The system will be used about one or two months a year and that is not a very efficient use of capital dollars . Under the HUD 202 program these kind of items can only be added with a large cash payment at loan closing that covers installation of the system and includes the maintenance costs for the entire 40 year loan period. This cash payment will equal approximately twice the cost of the irrigation system ($20 , 000) . 4. This home is designed in every way to be as close to a family home as possible. We wish to convey the image of a single family residence much like any other home in the neighbor- hood . The home will be the permanent home for our residents . The residents may be mentally retarded ; however, with staff support would enjoy watering the scrubs , trees and grass and the situation could be used as a learning experience. With the limited dollars available to us we believe our priority must be to spend these dollars on direct support of people. The facilities should include all the necessities of life, but beyond that we risk loosing public confidence if we spend donated dollars on amenities that the general public can not afford in their own homes. The Good Shepherd organization depends on the general pub- lic support in the form of donations to supplement the programs . Generally, the dollars provided by state funding are not adequate to do the job. A recent study by King County showed that all the operators of group homes in King County are spending more money for operating the group homes than the state provides . It is with this perspective that we wish you would review the need for the irrigation system and rule that this home can be properly maintained without it. Sincerely, Ed Stanley President cc: Earl Clymer, Mayor Don Erickson, Zoning Administrator Glen Gordon, Fire Marshall Lawrence J Warren, City Attorney Gary Norris , Traffic Engineer Richard M. Stredicke, Councilman Larry M. Springer, Policy Development Director Ronald Nelson, Building & Zoning Director John Adamson, Development Program Director John Morris , Depart . of Housing and Community Development • August 15. 1988 Renton City Council Minute. Page 242 z- Appeal: Good Shepherd Appeal of Hearing Examiner's recommendation dated 7/15/88 of Good of Washington R-010, Shepherd of Washington was filed by Darlene Long representing Ed Stanley and CU-010-88 regarding Rezone and Conditional Use Permit R-010-88 and CU-010-88 (Property located at 3900 block of NE 19th Street). Refer to Planning and Development Committee. MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY HUGHES, COUNCIL ADOPT THE CONSENT AGENDA AS PRESENTED. CARRIED. CORRESPONDENCE Letter from Ray M. Dunlap, Attorney representing Maltby Tank & Barge, Citizen Comment: Utility: Inc., re South Talbot Reservoir bid opening 8/5/88, alleged that the low bid South Talbot Hill received by the City contained irregularities and requested careful review of Reservoir Bid Opening bid. MOVED BY HUGHES, SECONDED BY MATHEWS, CORRESPONDENCE BEREFERRED TO THE UTILITIES COMMITTEE AND CITY ATTORNEY. CARRIED. PUD: Final, Victoria Hills Public Works Director Richard Houghton reported staff review of site plan Access to Benson Road for Victoria Hills PUD Access to Benson Road S., concluded that the South proposed access between Victoria Hills PUD to Benson Road South is a possibility, since the access point is halfway between Puget and Benson intersection and South 26th and Benson. Since a full review of the traffic report has not been completed by the traffic engineer; a final okay cannot be given, but as soon as an assessment is made of the traffic report, a report will be provided. In response to Council inquiry, Administrative Assistant Parness requested that this matter be referred to the City Attorney for review prior to Council decision, as Council has retained jurisdiction. OLD BUSINESS Council President Keolker-Wheeler extended congratulations to all individuals Renton River Days involved in making Renton River Days such a successful festival. Utilities Committee Utilities Committee Chairman Hughes presented a report in concurrence with Report the Public Works Department recommending the City participate in the cost Utility: Water System of oversizing some of the water lines for 8" to 12" in the Plat of Liberty Oversizing Agreement, View in the amount of $13,847.60, as requested by the Conner Development Liberty View Plat Company. These funds will be budgeted in the 1989 Budget. MOVED BY HUGHES, SECONDED BY MATHEWS, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE UTILITIES COMMITTEE. CARRIED. Fire Protection: Utilities Committee Chairman Hughes presented a report in concurrence with Maplewood Golf Course the Public Works Department recommending the Fire Department and Parks Facilities Department install the water main necessary for fire protection at Maplewood Golf Course Facilities. Funding is available through the Utility Division budget. MOVED BY HUGHES, SECONDED BY MATHEWS, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE UTILITIES COMMITTEE. CARRIED. CAG-88-037: Telemetry Utilities Committee Chairman Hughes presented a report recommending that and Supervisory Control the low bid of Omega Contractors, Inc. be accepted, and that the contract be System, Phase III, Data awarded to FMT Technology and Omega Contractors, Inc., to conform to the Logger prequalification and bid. This contract went to bid with the only permitted bidders being those that had prequalified to bid. Only two bids were received. The second low bidder, Datablend, protested the bid of the low bidder, Omega Contractors, Inc. The staff saw no deviation from the prequalification or from the bid specifications. The Committee further recommends that the Mayor and City Clerk be authorized to sign said contract. MOVED BY HUGHES, SECONDED BY MATHEWS, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE UTILITIES COMMITTEE. CARRIED. Planning and Planning and Development Committee Chairman Mathews presented a report Development Committee recommending that the Parker PUD date to start construction be extended to Report PUD: Final, May 4, 1990, which would allow for a more advantageous route to the City Parker, FPUD-024-85 be negotiated and designed. MOVED BY MATHEWS, SECONDED BY STREDICKE, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Appeal: Henderson Planning and Development Committee Chairman Mathews presented a report Homes, Inc., Preliminary recommending that the Hearing Examiner's recommendation of May 24, Plat, Summerwind III, 1988, be reversed on the following two items: IV,V, VI, PP-077-86 i`1,0 djp 4 S CITY OF RENTON FINANCE DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor Maxine E. Motor, City Clerk August 11, 1988 APPEAL FILED BY DARLENE LANG, REPRESENTING ED STANLEY RE: Appeal of Hearing Examiner's recommendation, dated July 15, 1988,. rezone and conditional use permit for Good Shepherd of Washington, R-010-88 and CU-010-88. To Parties of Record: Pursuant to Title IV, Chapter 30, City Code, written appeal of Hearing Examiner's recommendation has been filed with the City, Clerk, along with the proper fee of $75.00. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the written appeal and other pertinent documents will be reviewed by the Council's Planning and Development Committee and will be considered by the City Council when the matter is reported out of Committee. The Council Secretary will notify all parties of record of the date and time of the Planning and Development Committee meeting. If you are not listed in local telephone directories and wish• to attend the meeting, please call the Council Secretary at 235-2586 any weekday after 1:00 p.m. for information. Sincerely, CITY OF RENTON Maxine E. Motor, CMC City Clerk 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 (206) 235-2501 APPLICATION Page - 2 . 2 . SPECIFICATION OF ERRORS . Correction: Recommendaton #2 states that the execution of restrictive covenants which require that in all respects the limitations on the property shall be those of the R-1 zoning code. Therefore , the requirement of the installation of a fully automatic irrigation system, which is a requirement for commercial development is not appropriate for this development . 3 . SUMMARY OF ACTION REQUESTED . Please rescind the requirement of the installation of a fully automatic irrigation system. For.Use By City Clerk's Office Only A. I . # AGENDA ITEM • RENTON CITY COUNCIL MEETING SUBMITTING Dept./Div./Bd./Comm. City Clerk For Agenda Of August 15, 1988 (Meeting Date) Staff Contact Maxine E. Motor (Name) Agenda Status: • SUBJECT: Appeal of Hearing Examiner's Consent • XXX Recommendation on Good Shepherd of Public Hearing Correspondence Washington Rezone and Conditional Use Ordinance/Resolution Permit. Fi1p No. R-010-88 and CU-010-88 Old Business Exhibits: (Legal Descr. , Maps, Etc.)Attach New Business Study Session A. City Clerk's letter • Other B. Letter of Appeal C. Hearing Examiner's Report, 7/15/88 Approval : Legal Dept. Yes_ No_ N/A COUNCIL ACTION RECOMMENDED: Refer to Finance Dept. Yes No. N/A Planning and Development Committee Other Clearance FISCAL IMPACT: Expenditure Required $ Amount $ Appropriation- Budgeted Transfer Required L SUMMARY (Background information, prior action and effect of implementation) (Attach additional pages if necessary.) Appeal filed by Darlene Lang, representing Ed Stanley for Good Shepherd of Washington, accompanied by the required fee received on August 9, 1988. PARTIES OF RECORD/INTERESTED CITIZENS TO BE CONTACTED: 1 SUBMIT THIS COPY TO CITY CLERK BY NOON ON THURSDAY WITH DOCUMENTATION. WRITTEN APPEAL OF HEARING EXAMINER' S DECISION/RECOMMENDATION TO RENTON CITY COUNCIL. APPLICATION NAME: FILE NO. R-010-88 and CU-010-88 Good Shepherd of Washington The undersigned interested party hereby files its Notice of Appeal from the Decision or Recommendation of the Land Use Hearing Examiner, dated Jul y 15 19 88 1 . IDENTIFICATION OF PARTY APPELLANT: REPRESENTATIVE (IF ANY) : Ed Stanley Darlene Lang Name: Name: Address: 18940 Marine View Drive Addres4751 South 172nd Place Seattle, Washington 98166 Seattle , Washington 98188 Telephone No. 243-2895 Telephone No. 243-7044 2. SPECIFICATION OF ERRORS (Attach additional sheets if necessary) Set forth below are the specific errors or law or fact upon which this appeal is based: FINDINGS OF FACT: (Please designate number as denoted • in the Examiner' s Report) No. Error: CITY OF R"MTON Correction: • giN 919,8 IECEOWM ITY CLEPK'S OFFICE CONCLUSIONS: No. Error:' Correction: OTHER: Decision : Conditional Use Permit is approved subject to the No. 4 • Error: following conditions : Fully automatic irrigation must be iiisLalled. Correction: Please see attachment . 3. SUMMARY OF ACTION REQUESTED: The City Council is requested to grant the following relief: (Attach explanation, if desired) Reverse the Decision or Recommendation and grant the following relief : • X Modify the Decision or Recommendation as follows: Please see attachment . Remand to the Examiner for further consideration as follows : Other: /9/sr ellant/Represe tative Signature Date NOTE: Please refer to Title IV, Chapter 30 of the Renton Municipal Code, and Sections 4-3016 and 4-3017, specifically (see reverse side of page) for specific appeal procedures. 4i ®, CITY OF RENTON NIL FINANCE DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor Maxine E. Motor, City Clerk August 11, 1988 APPEAL FILED BY DARLENE LANG, REPRESENTING ED STANLEY RE: Appeal of Hearing Examiner's recommendation, dated July 15, 1988, rezone and conditional use permit for Good. Shepherd of Washington, R-010-88 and CU-010-88 To Parties of Record: Pursuant to Title IV, Chapter 30, City Code, written appeal of Hearing Examiner's recommendation has been filed with the City Clerk, along with the proper fee of $75.00. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the written appeal and other pertinent documents will be reviewed by the Council's Planning and Development Committee and will be considered by the City Council when the matter is reported out of Committee. The Council Secretary will notify all parties of record of the date and time of the Planning and Development Committee meeting. If you are not listed in local telephone directories and wish to attend the meeting, please call the Council Secretary at 235-2586 any weekday after 1:00 p.m. for information. Sincerely, _ CITY OF RENTON • .Maxine E. Motor, CMC City Clerk 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2501 - r CITY OF RENTON FINANCE DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor ' Maxine E. Motor, City Clerk August 11, 1988 CERTIFICATE OF MAILING STATE OF WASHINGTON) )ss COUNTY OF KING ). MAXINE E. MOTOR, City Clerk for the City of Renton, being first duly sworn on oath, deposes and says that she is a citizen of the United States and a resident of the State of Washington, over the age of 21 and not a party to nor interested in the matter. That on the llth day of August, 1988, at the hour of 5:00 p.m. your affiant duly mailed and placed in the United States Post Office at Renton, King County, Washington, by first class mail to all parties of record, notice of appeal of Hearing Examiner's recommendation filed by Darlene Lang, representing. Ed Stanley, Good Shepherd of Washington, R-010-88 and CU-010-88. Maxine E. Motor, CMC City Clerk SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE me this llth day of August, 1988. 0L). Notary ublic in and for the State of Washi t n, residing in J JCRALV1y 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2501 • CITY OF RENTON N? 28137 _ .i FINANCE DEPARTMENT RENTON, WASHINGTON 98055 • RECEIVED OF hA___t_4_, � � 6_/1.e)g . 7,dzi.44,1L;44,1 ) — - o11) - g f c u AU G 9 988 • - 7QL/ TOTAL Received bYom � • ; • • { WRITTEN APPEAL OF HEARING EXAMINER'S DECISION/RECOMMENDATION TO RENTON CITY COUNCIL. APPLICATION NAME: FILE NO. c;R-01O-88' and CU-010-88 Good Shepherd of Washington K .. The undersigned interested party hereby files its Notice of Appeal from the Decision or Recommendation of the Land Use Hearing Examiner, dated July 15 19 88 1 . IDENTIFICATION OF PARTY APPELLANT: REPRESENTATIVE (IF ANY) : Ed Stanley Darlene Lang Name: Name: . Address: 18940 Marine View Drive Addres 751 South 172nd Place Seattle, Washington 98166 Seattle, Washington 98188 Telephone No. 243-2895 Telephone No. 243-7044 2. SPECIFICATION OF ERRORS (Attach additional sheets i,f necessary) Set forth below are the specific errors or law or fact upon which this appeal is based: FINDINGS OF FACT: (Please designate number as denoted • in the Examiner's Report) - No. Error: art f OF FIFN ON Correction: MC, O 038 cm cLEPKCs aricE CONCLUSIONS: No. Error Correction: • OTHER: . Decision: Conditional Use Permit is approved subject to the No. 4 . Error: following conditions : Fully automatic irrigation must be 11iStallGd. Correction• Please see attachment. 3. SUMMARY OF ACTION REQUESTED: The City Council is requested to grant the following relief: (Attach explanation, if desired) Reverse the Decision or Recommendation and grant the following relief: X Modify the Decision or Recommendation as follows: Please see attachment . Remand to the Examiner for further consideration as follows: Other: 2. ; 1/9/6e A ellant/Repres tative Signature Date NOTE: ' Please refer to Title IV, Chapter 30 of the Renton Municipal Code, and Sections 4-3016 and 4-301'7, .specifically (see reverse side of page) for specific appeal ,procedures. 4-3016: APPEAL: Unless an ordintaice providing for review of decision of the E) :ner requires review thereof by the Supa Court, any interested party aggrieved t le Examiner's written decision or recorr 'dation may submit a j , notice of appeal to the City Clerk upon a form furnished by the City Clerk, within fourteen 114) calendar days from the date of the Examiner's written report. The notice of appeal shall be accompanied by a fee in accordance with the Fee Schedule of the City. . . (A) The written notice of appeal shall fully, clearly and thoroughly specify the substantial errorls) in fact or law which exist in the record of the proceedings from which the appellant seeks relief. (B) Within five 15)days of receipt of the notice of appeal, the City Clerk shall notify all parties of record of the receipt of the appeal. Other parties of record may submit letters in support of their positions within ten (10) days of the dates of mailing of the notification of the filing of the notice of appeal. (C) Thereupon the Clerk shall forward to the members of the City Council all of the pertinent documents, including the written decision or recommendation, findings and conclusions contained in the Examiner's report, the notice of appeal, and additional letters submitted by the parties. • (D) No public hearing shall be held by the City Council. No new or additional evidence or testimony shall be accepted by the City Council unless a showing is made by the party offering the evidence that the evidence could not reasonably have been available at the time of the hearing before the Examiner. If the Council determines that additional evidence is required, the Council may remand the matter to the Examiner for reconsideration. The cost of transcription of the hearing record shall be borne by the appellant. In the absence of an entry upon the record of an order by the City Council authorizing new or additional evidence or testimony, it shall be presumed that no new or additional evidence or testimony has been accepted by the City Council, and that the record before the City Council is identical to the hearing record before the Hearing Examiner. (E) The consideration by the City Council shall be based solely upon the record, • the Hearing Examiner's report, the notice of appeal and additional submissions :by�perties. ekrt J) 'Damon, appeal of a decision of the Hearing Examiner on an application submitted pursuant to Section 4-3010(A) and after examination of the record, ,'j u ',the U ouncil determines that a substantial error in fact or law exists in the - - - record, it may remand the proceeding to Examiner for reconsideration, or ! modify, or reverse the decision of the Examiner accordingly. • (G) If, upon appeal from a recommendation of the Hearing Examiner upon an application submitted pursuant to Section 4-3010(B) or (C), and after examination of the record, the Council determines that a substantial error in fact or law exists in the record, or that a recommendation of the Hearing Examiner should be disregarded or modified, the City Council may remand the proceeding to the Examiner for reconsideration, or enter its own decision upon the application pursuant to Section 4-3010(B) or (C). (H) In any event, the decision of the City Council shall be in writing and shall specify any modified or amended findings and conclusions other than those set forth in the report of the Hearing Examiner. Each material finding shall be supported by substantial evidence in the record. The burden of proof shall rest with the appellant. (Ord. 3658, 9-13-82) 4-3017: COUNCIL ACTION: Any application requiring action by the City Council shall be evidenced by minute entry unless otherwise required by law. When taking any such final action, the Council shall make and enter findings of fact from the record and conclusions therefrom which support its action. Unless otherwise specified, the City Council shall be presumed to have adopted the Examiner's findings and conclusions. (A) . In the case of a change of the zone classification of property (rezone), the City Clerk shall place the ordinance on the Council's agenda for first reading. Final reading of the ordinance shall not occur until all conditions, restrictions or modifications which may have been required by the Council have been accomplished or provisions for compliance made to the satisfaction of the . Legal Department. (B) All other applications requiring Council action shall be placed on the Council's agenda for consideration. (Ord. 3454, 7-28-80) (C) The action of the Council approving, modifying'or rejecting a decision of the Examiner, shall be final and conclusive, unless within thirty (30) calendar days from the date of the action an aggrieved party or person obtains a writ of review from the Superior Court of Washington for King County, for purposes of review of the action taken. (Ord. 3725, 5-9-83) APPLICATION Page - 2 2. SPECIFICATION OF ERRORS . Correction: Recommendaton #2 states that the execution of restrictive covenants which require that in all respects the limitations on the property shall be those of the R-1 zoning code. Therefore , the requirement of the installation of a fully automatic irrigation system, which is a requirement for commercial development is not appropriate for this development . 3 . SUMMARY OF ACTION REQUESTED . Please rescind the requirement of the installation of a fully automatic irrigation system. Good Shepherd of Washington R-010-88 and CU-010-88 July 15, 1988 Page 7 to any home, for the occasional party or special event. The four stalls appear to provide a good compromise between parking and asphalt. After all, the home is intended to provide a home-like setting not an institutional setting. 12. The home has been estimated to generate approximately 11 to 12 vehicle trips per day, just two (2) more trips than the typical single family home. Traffic obviously will not create any undue impacts on the neighborhood. 13. The single family home will be approximately 2,800 square feet in area. The home has been designed to resemble a rambler from the street. The one floor home will not block views, nor will it create shading or shadow effects on surrounding properties. The home is also designed to provide easy access for the developmentally disable residents and to provide easy maneuverability for staff in serving the residents. The home is not unlike others in the immediate neighborhood both as to scale and lot size. Actually, one of the primary differences will be that mandatory landscaping and landscaping upkeep will be required, whereas for ordinary single family homes such matters are left to the discretion of the homeowner. 14. As specified above, the home will provide four parking spaces located to the east of the home but still 20 feet from the property line. Landscaped screening and a fence will provide separation between the parking area, driveway, and adjacent lot. Parking and associated impacts such as headlight glare and engine noise should not create any impacts on the adjacent property. 15. The plans do not reveal any potential problems with either pedestrian or vehicle circulation. Again, the proposed use is equivalent to a single family home in most particulars and impacts in this area such as circulation, should be minimal. 16. The home will be constructed with noise attenuation built in. The home will utilize thicker walls and completely insulated windows. The fencing and landscaping will help to contain noise, if any, on site and will also minimize any potential light or glare problems. 17. The various setbacks described will be landscaped with a variety of materials. The entire site, with the exception of the building pad and driveway/parking lot, will be planted with lawn grass. The entire perimeter of the site will contain larger plants including Black pine, Deodora cedar, Pin oak, Flowering cherry and Red maple trees. The applicant also proposes planting fruit trees on the site with a variety of bushes and scrubs gracing the site. The areas immediately adjacent to the home will also be landscaped. 18. The site is served by water and sewer lines. The applicant will provide off-site improvements as required by the Building Code. The proposed development does not appear likely to burden the utility infrastructure. 19. In conclusion, the proposed group home for six developmentally disabled adults appears to be a use which will not adversely affect the general public health, safety or welfare nor does it appear to be a use which will adversely affect the residential amenities of the immediate community. It will be staffed by professionals and operated by an organization which has been successful with similar homes elsewhere both in the State and along the west coast. Immediate neighbors, community residents and neighbors of similar homes expressed support for the home and suggested that such a use did not, and would not impair their properties. Since the group home will not adversely affect the community, and there is a demonstrated need for such uses, the Conditional Use Permit will be approved, subject to approval of the Rezone by the City Council. RECOMMENDATION The City Council should approve the reclassification of the subject site from R-1 to G-1 subject to the following conditions: 1. The execution of restrictive covenants which require that the property shall be used for a group home for not more than six (6) developmentally disabled adults. 2. The execution of restrictive covenants which require that in all other respects the use limitations on the property shall be those of the R-1 zoning code. Good Shepherd of Washington R-010-88 and CU-010-88 July 15, 1988 Page 8 3. The execution of restrictive covenants which state that the failure to develop the property according to the terms of the Conditional Use Permit within one year, or to otherwise abandon the specific Conditional Use Permit or discontinue this group home for any reason, shall cause the property to revert to its prior R-1 zoning classification. DECISION The Conditional Use Permit is approved subject to the following conditions: 1. The City Council approve the reclassification of the subject site from R-1 to G-1. 2. The conditions imposed by the ERC are fully complied with by the applicant. 3. The group home shall be limited to a population of not more than six (6) developmentally disabled adults. 4. That all landscaping be subject to approval of the City's landscape architect, and that a fully automatic system of irrigation be installed to assure the continued survival of the landscaping. The applicant shall also be required to maintain the landscaping on a regular basis to assure it remains neat. Said landscaping shall be subject to approval by the City's landscape architect. 5. The applicant develop the home as represented on Exhibits 3, 4 and 5 with no substantial modifications, and that the structural details presented in the application be fully complied with regarding wall thickness, insulation and sound proofing, etc. ORDERED THIS 15th day of July, 1988. FRED J. KA MAN HEARING EXAMINER TRANSMITTED THIS 15th day of July, 1988 to the parties of record: John Morris City of Renton Department of Housing and Community Development Ed Stanley 18940 Marine View Drive, S.W. Seattle, WA. 98166 Darlene Lang 4751 So. 172nd Place Seattle, WA. 98188 John Caruso, Architect 137-1/2 Park Lane Kirkland, Washington Pat Holmes 4621 South 164th S.E. Seattle, Washington 98188 Cathy Hawley 1717 Union Avenue N.E. Renton, WA. 98056 Joann Hart 6511 So. 153rd Street Seattle, WA. 98188 Gene Lux 10850 Dixon South Seattle, WA. 98178 Good Shepherd of Washington R-010-88 and CU-010-88 July 15, 1988 Page 9 TRANSMITTED THIS 15th day of July, 1988 to the following: Mayor Earl Clymer Councilman Richard M. Stredicke Don Erickson, Zoning Administrator Richard Houghton, Public Works Director Members, Renton Planning Commission Larry M. Springer, Policy Development Director Glen Gordon, Fire Marshal Ronald Nelson, Building & Zoning Director Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney John Adamson, Developmental Program Coordinator Gary Norris, Traffic Engineer Renton Record-Chronicle Pursuant to Title IV, Section 3015 of the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 P.M. July 29, 1988. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for a review by the Examiner within fourteen (14) days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific errors relied upon by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record, take further action as he deems proper. An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Section 3016, which requires that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk, accompanying a filing fee of $75.00 and meeting other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection or purchase in the Finance Department, first floor of City Hall. The Appearance of Fairness Doctrine provides that no ex parte (private one-on-one) communications may occur concerning pending land use decisions. This means that parties to a land use decision may not communicate in private with any decision-maker concerning the proposal. Decision-makers in the land use process include both the Hearing Examiner and members of the City Council. All communications concerning the proposal must be made in public. This public communication permits all interested parties to know the contents of the communication and would allow them to openly rebut the evidence. Any violation of this doctrine would result in the invalidation of the request by the Court. The Doctrine applies not only to the initial public hearing but to all Requests for Reconsideration as well as Appeals to the City Council. o o - --- y� " > a • • • • 1 • iA •O1 i ti t`'' ..l.1Z�`' M 2/7,S 3 PtivraN a.Pv. 4o7b . • C.77 !•50AL 100 -3os .sxi 405.9/ • RENrtxl Agesi oA 1 7L ls/fp j.{ r o • • V i • � N • 0 Ab• p ,r, , \0 �5 Qi_� o ki ..w. t Z $IN N 9°2I . .rdp tic)) Ile Et t I�� I • �ZR Q a • v p St/rE A'A SE. A 'B . .� _ e : ,.� •90 p 'Lp 1 0 �_ O o � 2' I° . . 2.19 I m• ti. •�s.• I z Ac.. N , : ,� nr 03 r3 o s.e i �i r c 2 >n - c , .,=_am • i2,3 a> — — — • i • • /�co 4_:i �3., y,sn,n"i'l.r,i r�v �" t-I M•. I.,^ 1 5' riti SS r g•, l h� �Q : 7 IZs N D cot IAA,h1 • K, o A r*1 h t i l +. Nits';:�; ., '= ,;; ;,:: "S gB./4.32it! �1 �.4 Ve • ( �'r 'eB��4'31W. ''S): 22 o 1 1 3.3 fib: � : ' s'p, �, 0 o Po . lay F� racaue �: •• nl M N. %•B•t/�ji'a.u> w.,�f+w w.3J a:k '12S : f ., /2t oyB y�� Jti► sa/t! 2/0 M:aa•11yJ, in - F' 23 /S ki o O y31 ' lzi 0 0o th. r • ;S N.al-7—_6�yyy_� yn, S. Q� �, Opp 0020 y �. E 366304 Ne9. zc•syw.% +t;* \ s.; O\ '1 �0 /Z¢?`k 1 O " 0010 4Q�Aq 40 t. • /20 0 1 4 1 I o//o .619./4. ` '..rzti,V `,, > • ,,.f: y� `' c 00 So ?s-• 64 i„r:!',,;..1; as'`z2 • �. w, /20 �s 6a4. g613d ►� y - � . ;, '. 1i.•• 41 26 45174 .,.. , /8 1 `' ti /y .. h yN x-,20 $b A•tt pc. 1� i; -:I.,: ;. 0/20• V I 9Rse of N �t oo. Q, Q ••,,.:,• ;Y:•.';: _ /a9.cg ,79. .a b Co./•!6 0 . '0 0 5`0 •. w ` ti,ie; �/Q i. .�.09.yrs• - - I0 7 T - • 1� S T. a .. . /zo ' g €,;:,' g•rc > ,-.6.!, ' /09.7 - ,n 1,J,' • • V (M1ly:h ,! • • • • tt • I ' •\:VI' W�ky .I Q 'Q• • �. :':Y .'Slit,'.•', In i.•: .. :00 /Ost 9 i� • -- 1.. ..''I',14: V liY•„M ;�;+ l i�yj�'.0:; . VF. . H��• ^' i �,Y, ;v i.` Q, :'�, i• ID.ir�:..i,?�M M1 it 9• aow.11 moo' • �'EIY dit/ +/ -i: f•;,:.:.; . -: ,t; A;."v,.:„4':::..: 41n711-5 oc0 2300 799.to 484 7 ;tx,k:is ": /:s>I *3: ; Jp \ da>. a �' r ( Yt• h.a i.... .. . .r.:, �ErITi�!I,., • u„ Ij v>a" l i'J '' : \' Z a'' r:'j 0 EST S R OOK i TOWNHOUSES • --mow o2 k1 . s_3•••. ti:< OUSES COND. .�..r.,• :•.x. ,;:,4.'•,-,. ,.. PHASE I • II _ . '•' • m .,..I; 40 lb, t.`: • V O L. 41/2 0 2 6 :.1• '�:: .$ 1• :'t>;•.::,';'.,Ir;'.. PHASE 2 11 .va -09-4ow zs9 So'•'`r=`t�?D, t' ,,Ar:'rt. ;'.k VOL.42/79-80 yi'.�•.,,.:�,1�*R 1t p i;'p t ry • • wow res wreRN+r N.E.19th STREET wee e•1u.reR e>dr.a PINE wrpnxrr—N I I'/'A • ewerla f•n.M1.- G. -.1elaDT.6•Wrenl - • oaet.a eore cr ravra __Z l�'r / 1 1 - --- -- - ---�_--- -------------- 1 i i .rw D•wt ee1eR __ " 1 �. oaDr.r.r.C-.raw ravoa I —L �on3r.rouew�- �--'I oasi>a rwEw r.�e" - —: --.--• § 1 ire�_ ———s........7 r I — R.].efilrep ro1eJ.1.1.1 I A:- / r'—•—•—•CD00.—•—. �. r—�c:,.�j=` •�j•nailo' \—.—.—�\ .•�•— nmm• I as I I p • Iraram ede@a` L _\ca,_ 1,..!--,1-- F ----V-\�-\- 1 ' ' ®�•o rare. %� \ \ g I� I C\El \ '��'' "° I I j C� w 1 I rrrr a R o nne \` \`I II •I I \ u. \ • I. I I o, .=.1 I -§L s III ` \\ \ 11 I I � � T I 1 1 �\ _�/ I ���_ I I 1zL a I -I Jo -- `% — GROUP HOME 1 I j el 1 / .�/. ,e t.•a. ��. i m j II / N. II 1 I o • _ _ I / ones rwc `l / U l \ I. I g EII teroree .Io n..[� // \ I I . . - .. I 2i nee � 1 'I Zi I i // .,, 1 - I I $1 ..O E. . 1 I. I II / r DroR.LwreR wurm0-o / , $ I I 'I —0 6 j `Q 45 ,I I $I Qzz j j / .' / �1 I I I I W F 1 xCd II .�. �jri = _i- = - _ - - - 1 I I 1 xmz . �.1._._19 / 1 I i �a O I t >o .,. I • I a) F O u, ut SITE PLAN! o. I O c,,W . erxe.r•re./. ' C.5 O P4 • 0ti.0 °Lb oq,Ooa, a33 PLANTING SCHEDULE —�•— T •in— ' ' j • � • e ••e1—•— o r ., POT urn w.re cerncn wJr: momw . WE Rerl.wm.x.c.n a�e�°og w+r o0ro0n^� uw 0 HE x 50/1.1lr E o•ae7 One yr a.Iw r rloaev_teea++ er.xMuu r °tea`y u r.rtelw •�.a �nr,uro zo WOW u•ae �'• n v0 »eonm R.d Z 11.I . j cn ww- e • \� a two v Id. • 115.5 raPLaaiIE 0 n ouaercuu tom,e.Reeraer 1 a.L ee•weZ • o O r • O sencceOR�•n werlm amr 1 a.L ..•we uv+ u I 'vO Iyyr1 v1e•coc.roar rra W W : o n+maovolaav 'JeJn n.1Re' 16.41. L•Nc top i p u O loll C V a.•Ree.K nrR1 root Q a a x O .50.15.6.1411...... JAPA ESE eRrrn. 10JL J.•ae G I - np p�,,�` U m !Ir rmeca rxxeomar.. PACING PAP rmrlLe r a.L ve eie o O•' r i[)z fa o`1rfit • O FENCE DETAIL in r zz it r-orcmetRJtu ceo.n e.e tr...tea .••e•erc I U p.. ...0. II !PALE..••I.e• d) -1sa im rrw.nioA1.• + .l.1- ' • CIll4]l[r.uenao rM OAK eaa,I'.a. �—uvl ek \Ve. Howe a '-a uu.Ia.IacDT.. pep Iw... e LANDSCAPE PLA11111111.W... . m iqC .QR MO PWI le..es.0 L - - 2.61.F 1.•]P.e• - . - Al ,�r _ • • A .P.O.PICA CEDAR _ _— T ep SSS ^1 -,—�_ _ __�_—•_—;—_�___—_—_—_ _ --_—_ II A -.asr ears Ev-� 1 I/ /l-l(I W s SG1 - � tO'EdsF'•EHr 1✓1 I ��/ ` u e T 4. .PA PA 5 r-I :----3- / - • /\ ..„ __4 . * 11111F !APT.SOIL ��j Hwy ' .. %� _ w :�fd��> J y ' �� e• dz. ��x LL 1 ;� - j,V/, DECIDUOUS i Z«PL VTR G DETAIL ,• 11 4�0 0 • I �V/, r _ I L— r ice? • s4 1. 0 %APB Ef GROUP HOME W \IV _aT 5 '. AV:.‹..........-<, i �lIP� CI= o • q'�\.) F.�VUi 1 COImo scaz i g w" r�ido<irr>• e EVE.B'.]IZc�•1 TREE PLANTING DETAIL Uj / o ppmL o� aa� uo 0 p • /,,. CO o Q �+�� Oo ��o. I O Oo • �' Y * QQ S i D 0 ° o �3 • pop°00a ' ° 0000 00 0 Op°oo 00 0 00 / / 0 0l bo o ��Vi _- _- ,-_-. ... - �1V/� �V//-- �1V/, �W/, -_. __- �11/U �W/, -W/ o IF oo %an� '17•m� 1A\ �•/I\�� •mR •/R %/ins` -///R• %/im•p imp•` m�•� �/iA 00 ��01 / / / W GROUND COVER PLANTING PATTERN po °D .0 ° o '��0000 ° �_ --CEO — —,— o•oQ . �_� I — y 6`N.E.15th 5T LANDSCAPE PLAN YTt a o w Ne,•. -a• WWo —.1. — — •-. J o vr�r o RAIL w uu: <Er .eodras.e•wc urn uns I carol Mn COMJrtKN 1 a. Iaas':dwc>,xdesc a+• uin r z I �a-ev1 r16e'.E eaomor].sls '�•+dracf,xdenG C0 U 0 's: SY.11 RED eon]>icEs W dunedrl co co p J ERICA C.]:x.1=A •TCA/0O J1RE• I G4 12,eic P.NYdtd et.Q PnE eb.�a•Gsl e•-o•orc �-r east r><w a.1.:OTTOM POST J>S1 r woe,ruo+ J1 .adT..ea 0 Z 0 I'• ]ow WINGER MLA Z Q' y" K-I J r +6 r]PK salt.•TO•off Q Iu .. urPE:¢i0U•I C.1rc>an sT..N+>woaT RAT e'eic CE•Dp. ere.]•CAL J J n. LdW O �eWs16e0.•E(dvdDE W u ~ ap6wPdwL• 77 EP cric L6R PdTTER! C.DEODdWd 46 CEDdR EDGSY, a �- U 0V I•..�.I Y=kti 64.MP.O.w MsmVt>•DEEP OKR rl 2 �CEDAR STAPES • � REPC vE ' N 574,07u sUe-twcDE W �c�, PN OAK e. I I .e•CO NC.POST n4 0>wa�> >D• 0 agwDne PALM Rf e. CAL e ]• P_drlrf+G SOIL ® • n c »Pouu uacEa ed�Ecm' :ads.]v TALL �..s = V 2. -4- ,.]_a•d+AVE� uaGEF ! F m O mA>CFEER' IGAL,20 Tdu PRHif eE/e<.lu KUWL•hV CEHtf .e.IM•GN. iCup . Ory O RHODODE n .iEdN PIAME• ]G:1.].•TALL %•eie A•R _ II �I - ti] .EDGING DETAIL FENCE DETAIL SHRUB PLANTING DETAIL J p ><fnld.dPorau adPdnE>e,o,r ]Ga..ea-TALL ]s•ac 1I.~T eraaR IeaHM RED rurtE e.e.ly Du 'IlL_ I'fl 1C SCALE ••a SCALE Na SCALE O' N .S InR:L'OLLFOR'1:w PACIFIC U6X MYRTLE 2 CAL.]a•T.::.1. S O•u/c ailT T1..ES >Ee•,N S.M•CAL • K j `— BROWN ROOF TAN SIDING: �� U/'WA !' ' IIIIIL . . NORTH ELEVATION WALE:va••r_o• . v L i a. i1 LOUVER -�\ C•t •e49 A GOt'.P091TION - -- \`` _ °HWCaLE ROOF , - �� ANODIMD ALI.�Tii7 GUTTERS — RAIN LEADERS • - . 4 .J,^ ��_ T:GMT KNOT CEDAR SIDING - - -_ _ - II - - 3 FN.FLOOR ELEV. % •-/ EAST ELEVATION SCALE:va•.-r.0• RIBULATaz.GLAZINGW �—J• a z w.. xx� C/]rnU d A ti �� O O O C=.Ix ��. Boa --- 0 0 Or - SOUTH ELEVATION SCALE:VA'•I'_0• • . N Z • _ ir--- , „_ . __ I WW 1 X_t -. ww --Ia — WEST'ELEVATION SCALE:V4 •1•-0• m. Ns. . • _ A2 n; 1 4,rA. 1' ., _II +t1 tt tt t, .• t. i• t� ,. ;; — '.. :I t, :•!� � l` _ lift �_._-'i :I :_:.� 1 t�t rf 1a� yam: .... 11 11 u :: .)fftL/-. .1 .1 1 . .•.t t• t. loo II.rf,�1 ! 11f1� 70 W • 1 .• '• t t .1 t •' JOJ rlt •JN II 1„ SOS +' - — — • A t w- 1 .... I - G .1 ul ' 1i lo. Or tot .' , c-4-ii f •' I i 1 L.! LL. �, - '' . i se US ra GO N Tf , :, 1. 3 ',,/\6 �I o,m t., ib -Li N'• _ •. ° 1� 5mom® '. �. '.e• ",;r .'ds ,:5«• `I' »•. f•� V.�t� ® e S! D4 • ti j 1 I I to 3— ,Ar t a�f Ir !. A. 1 e. t P'�t. 1 1 ! a .a,.„..).;.,.^ _ e. ,. �, e�+ *! �io,is :r :eF' , KIN�p', I J , �• , � �'•'r tr I � 1 I'.,_ '�'--� `-'-. .. et f er �m ti i*if� /.� o e. u cI 11�� rt rr ,. .. 'i. 6 .S ti ®Tr- `t x ; f ^11�z�314n� � 1 I 1 ;. 1 S i e �o�1 �e n 1, Ie Ie li. R—2 G '1 1' i v j 1. t- 1. 4 R-3;1 B ! R-2 - ` Il .gam R_3 ... , its f 1 1 fl1, .; t R-2 . '� c I._-J, t 1 ' 1 - i1 1 1 LQ. /P li Wh—t.7 .+ 1 , I G-1 -7 . [ . N 1 1 I R 1 1 GOOD SHEPHERD GROUP HOME FOR THE DEVELOPMENTALLY DISABLED FILES: R-010-87, CU-010-87 ' (REZONE & CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT) APPLICANT GOOD SHEPHERD OF WASHINGTON TOTAL AREA 0.847 ACRE PRINCIPAL ACCESS N.E. 19th STREET EXISTING ZONING R-1, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL EXISTING USE UNDEVELOPED PROPOSED USE SIX (6) RESIDENT GROUP HOME FOR THE DEVELOPMENTALLY DISABLED. COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN SINGLE FAMILY . COMMENTS PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF N.E. 19th STREET AT THE 3900 BLOCK, BETWEEN UNION AVENUE N.E. AND SHELTON AVENUE N.E. s . . - -. "'� y, _ It ' ' rf- -'I.\ � w- r'- ' . �- 'I1 1 \ ' \I, . 1, . . .: f ,.. ' THIS HOME WHICH FACES SHELTON AVENUE N.E. IS LOCATED ADJACENT TO THE PROPOSED GROUP HOME SITE ON 19TH STREET BETWEEN UNION AND SHELTON ' r / • r `tk F r • a1`. "Ri s - " • .,. .. THIS VIEW SHOWS THE VACANT LOT AND HOME WHICH FACES UNION AVENUE N.E. LOCATED DIRECTLY ACROSS THE STREET FROM THE PROPOSED GROUP HOME SITE ON 19TH AVENUE N.E. , RENTON, WASHINGTON. • • LOOKING TOWARD UNION AVENUE FROM SHELTON AVENUE, THE PROPOSED GROUP HOME SITE IS DIRECTLY IN FRONT OF YOU. THE HOME TO THE LEFT IN THE PICTURE FACES UNION AVENUE N.E. l,) J(64) _. __. .--..-----______ • ___________,..... , ., . .-..,.,.— 0 , // ni • u ,,'" <-, ea-kw E,7 i -71 27 W 1/.7i 7 '''44.,04 • .. • It -'-it ----,4t. 0._, 4----A-=--:-, g . ____. .,...„_....._.... L2.„--t. — . • ---- 61-Lt.-r /27,7.14 . • --ask_. .44 fliz-V--w - _ , . ...) as--- _ ,....,....„,„,,,t,.. .,,,,,....t...., ,...., _, ....,.......,.... ,,.,_ ok,.... ,,,,..__ /......„.„:„,,,c_.„ ' --67, kv-af pl c...)_)_j,a____ ,tiuz 0,,t,-4, ....._ , 1?-2----2-----2........ ,,.......- --t- -(-• (ff. 41,--)--2,------/..... /--/,r• /t4_ A._-_,...._, -17,------ , a...._ 7 as, . a jr./...-•"-F.._. x2.44_,..._.4.24. ../....„...„. . ( A -,..t..4.-, _,_,...„/ t74, . . . . . .., . 111---1,---/2. . , .. :. . . . I / 7 7 -2(cr- i 4/ . • • . . . .-i -12-3- -- 1g-- a-- f Fct 4- . . , . . . ae.: -ive...-4....,7c......,...............4_, . . ... , . , . . . . . _ . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • . . . . . . . . • . . .. . , . , . . . , . . . . ., . . . , . . . • • .. . . • . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . ,.. . . . . . . . . . •• . • C 1 eAr IC . . .:...._. . .._.. . _ . .„-. . ,. . . . . . • , . _.::. .. . . . _ 7/.--* .. are..e2 eke.Ixe42 ...// -Setee . . .,...... . ,..... , .• _ ,. .q.•.9,-As - - • _, -:._ .. • , UPI i:) :• . ;:-:i' -..-;"0 ...: . . - , . .. .. . . . • ell - d'' '-P- . ' • - ' - JUL -5 1968 . ___. ...... '•--•-•• .... • -cl .?c,-t) ? -Z ...-t.....9.-orzer_.•e_.- ,29...e.."-%_-.. , •_. • - . , !, ,: . ....•, . ,•..._. dra,s--5 "---. .... i ' --..• ••.... . .. 1 , ,.. .. ..., . - .. .. • - . • . ., . • . . "Arc2--c: e-A-C4/1-441 - '\:11,&...../-•-e.--(e-- -c....7-7 . , e-e • r-erc-# -. 4e. • , Th - 4e-'2 ,r- -e--} cN?‘' .o,r-d=-, i14, 72-7 "C.-e- A9772-e--CZ__,Z.e.-,-.7 *- ---. • k_5-• 4 -2-e-- .:7)40L'er /.-e,-77-z-e-- --e--77. Ae ----:, '-f-- • '1- #-.7W,eir‘w-i -4°-Me C7/1eq:Z . I 7,2-co ./ \. . _, 0- - -- ,e71- d-‘' • I'/'':F----,/r---,/-ZAV---eo.ee:' ,.---,--; L7 4/,-- c=?A•A z 7'" 2- 0 4,.;- ,12. ,t 7 '.e r_02/‘,,__ ..,1,_,m,42e=, . . . ____7-/4 , . (j'j.-117 • •- • • • . . C . I , 1=••fr' ', . .029 (1.‘74‘ .."2.Z., :,fre. •.= I ' • I I ' W• 771 • -----17C .:..': 9 14", 4 .1.42 i 72' . 4,7,e2" Ce#1 /f -----. ,'•40'-i,°' 4, 1'•••• /-, - . . • - . t... e . '••04t I 72) jg-- '''/:. .'"4"e 7-1i2/4 1• - i 0 June 27, 1988 RE: PUBLIC HEARING GOOD SHEPHERD OF WASHINGTON - GROUP HOME FOR THE DEVELOPMENTALLY DISABLED FILE NOS. ECF-010-88; R-010-88; CU-010-88 LOCATION: SOUTH SIDE OF N.E 19TH STREET AT THE 3900 BLOCK, BETWEEN UNION AND SHELTON AVENUE N.E. A public hearing before the City of Renton Land Use Hearing Examiner has been scheduled for Tuesday, July 5, 1988. The public hearing commences at 9:00 a.m. in the Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall. The applicant or representative(s) of the applicant is required to be present at the public hearing. A copy of the staff report will be available prior to the public hearing. If you have any questions, please call the Building and Zoning Department at 235-2550. Sincerel 4t, Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator DKE:db:sr CITY OF RENTON HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING AGENDA COMMENCING AT 9: 00 A.M. , TUESDAY, JULY 5, 1988 COUNCIL CHAMBERS, SECOND FLOOR, RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING The applications listed are in order of application number only and not necessarily the order in which they will be heard. Items will be called for hearing at the discretion of the Hearing Examiner. RENTON VILLAGE CINEMA Application for site plan approval to allow the construction of a new eight-plex cinema consisting of 36,253 sq. ft. and 2,260 seats on the site of existing three-plex cinema which will be demolished. GOOD SHEPHERD OF WASHINGTON- GROUP HOME FOR THE DEVELOPMENTALLY DISABLED . Proposal to rezone a .847 acre parcel from R-1 (Single Family . Residential) zoning to G-1 (General Use) zoning and application for a conditional use permit to develop a six resident, six bedroom group home for the developmentally disabled on the subject site. Property located on the south side of N.E. 19th Street at the 3900 block, between Union Avenue and Shelton Avenue N.E. ECF-010-88 ; R-010-88 ; CU-010-88 • BUILDING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING APPLICANT: Good Shepherd of Washington FILE NUMBER: ECF 010-88; R 010-88 ; CU 010-88 LOCATION: 3900 Block of N.E. 19th Street. Located on the south side of N.E. 19th Street, east of Shelton Avenue N.E. and west of Union Avenue N.E. A. SUMMARY AND PURPOSE OF REQUEST: The applicant is seeking to rezone the subject property ( . 847 acres) from R-1, Single-Family Residential Use, to G-1, General Use, and to develop the site with a group home for six developmentally disabled adults through a Conditional Use Permit, as required by the City' s Zoning Code. • B. GENERAL INFORMATION: 1. Owner of Record: Howard R. Kienle of 732 Melody Lane, Enumclaw, Washington 2 . Applicant: Good Shepherd of Washington 3 . Existing Zoning: R-1, Single-Family Residential Use 4. Existing Zoning in the Area: R-1, Single-Family Residential Use; R-2, Low-Density, Multi- Family Residential Use; R-3 , Medium-Density, Multi-Family Residential Use; and G-1, General Use. 5. Comprehensive Land Use Plan: Single-Family Residential 6. Size of Property: .847 acres/36,895 square feet approximately. 7 . Access: N.E. 19th Street 8 . Land Use: Site is vacant and unimproved. 9 . Neighborhood Characteristics: North: Single-family residential uses; vacant properties. East: Single-family residential uses; vacant properties. South: Single-family residential uses; vacant properties. West: Single-family residential uses; vacant properties. t - Preliminary Report to Hearing Examiner Good Shepherd of Washington Page 2 C. HISTORICAL/BACKGROUND: Action File Ordinance Date Annexation 2472 March, 1969 Rezone(G-7200 to R-1) 3634 June 13 , 1982 Lot Line Adjustment(LLA-004-84') N/A May, 1984 Short Plat(SHPL-049-85) N/A August 30, 1985 Waiver N/A Denied D. PUBLIC SERVICES: 1. Utilities a . Water: Prqperty is served by a two-inch water line via N.E. 19th, Street. b. Sewer: Property is served by an eight-inch sewer line via N.E. 19th Street. c. Storm Water Drainage: A drainage culvert is present. along N.E. 19th Street. 2 . Fire Protection: Provided by the City of Renton as per ordinance requirements. 3 . Transit: METRO Line #114 via Union Avenue. 4. Schools: N/A 5. Recreation: Kiwanis Park is approximately three miles to the south of the site; the May Creek recreation area is approximately seven miles to the north of the site. E. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE ZONING CODE: 1. Section 4-704, G-1, General Use Zone - 2. Section 4-706, R-1, Residential Zone - 3 . Section 4-748, Conditional Use Permit 4. Section 4-3014 (C) , Change of Zone Classification (Rezone) F. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR OTHER OFFICIAL CITY DOCUMENT: 1. Comprehensive Plan Compendium, March, 1986, Policies Element, Residential, pages 14-15. 2 . Comprehensive Plan Compendium, March, 1986, Policies Element, Northeast Renton, pages 55-60. G. DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS: 1. The applicant, Good Shepherd of Washington, currently owns a parcel of property at N.E. 19th Street which is .847 acres in size. The property is presently vacant. The applicant is seeking a rezone of this parcel of property from R-1, Single-Family Residential Use to G-1, General Use. The applicant is also seeking approval of a Conditional Use Permit to allow to development of a group home for six. developmentally disabled adults. 2 . The Environmental Review Committee reviewed this proposal. The Committee was primarily concerned with impacts on the surrounding residential uses with respect to traffic impacts, light and glare, noise, and public services, utilities and infrastructure. The Committee issued a Determination of Non-Significance - Mitigated - on May 4, 1988, with the following conditions: Preliminary Report to Hearing, Examiner . Good Shepherd of Washington Page 3 a. The applicant shall design and site the facility, including parking and ingress/egress routes, to be similar in style and placement on the lot to neighborhood residences. b. The applicant shall work with the City to develop. revised landscaping plans incorporating a greater number of plantings and larger shrubs and trees in order to enhance, the property and to provide better separation between the site and neighboring properties, for the purpose of minimizing visual impacts, noise impacts, and light and glare impacts from this development. c. The applicant shall work with the City to develop a plan or approved hours of operations, erosion control, drainage management, and cleaning of, construction equipment while the home is being constructed, in order to protect the integrity of the development site and the adjoining neighborhood. d. 'That the applicant provide the City with a $1, 000. 00 revolving cash bond to ensure that the roadway is kept clean of dirt and debris. 3 . Various City Departments have reviewed and commented on the proposal. The majority of. the staff reviewers recommended the proposal be approved with conditions. (See Appendix "B" for staff comments. ) 4. Section 4-3014 (C) lists three criteria that, the Hearing Examiner is asked to consider along with all other relevant information in making a decision on a rezone application. These criteria include the following: a. That substantial evidence was presented demonstrating the subject reclassification appears not to have been specifically considered at the time of the last area land use analysis and area zoning; or The subject property was annexed into the City of Renton in March of 1969 and the property received a G- 7200 zoning designation upon annexation to the City. In 1982, the City revised the Zoning Map for the purpose of consolidating similar type zoning classifications. The present R-1, Single-Family Residential zoning designation was applied at that time to the property. This modification 'of the Zoning Map did not look at the question of whether the zoning classifications were appropriate for the individual parcels of property in the City. The subject site is part of the Northeast Renton Area Plan which was adopted in December, 1981. There is no evidence that the subject reclassification was specifically considered at that time. The City' s Planning Division has indicated that further study of the Northeast area of the community is necessary, based upon changes in City perspectives about the future of this section, however, no schedule for such a review , has been planned to date. b. That the property is potentially classified for the proposed zone being requested pursuant to the policies set forth in the Comprehensive Plan and conditions have been met which would indicate the change is appropriate; or The Comprehensive Plan designates the subject property, and vicinity properties for single-family residential development. Reclassification of the property to allow Preliminary Report to Hearing. Examiner Good Shepherd of Washington Page 4 the proposed single-family style group home residential development would not be inconsistent with the existing Comprehensive Plan goals for single-family residential development in this area. As the development standards established in the Zoning Code are more stringent for the General Use zone, than they are for the Single- Family Residential zone, the proposed, reclassification is not viewed as having negative impacts upon the local community. Minimum lot size in the G-1, General Use Zone, is 35, 000 square feet whereas minimum lot size for the R-1, Single-Family Residential Zone is 7200 square feet. Environmental performance standards are similar for both zones. The group home development planned by the applicant in conjunction with the proposed reclassification is a conditional use under G-1, General Use Zone, requirements as established in the Zoning Code. The proposed use is similar to and compatible with residential uses in the adjacent R-1, Single-Family Residential Use Zone and near-by G-1, General Use Zones. It is noted, however, that there are principally permitted uses in the G-1, General Use, zone that would not compliment existing uses in the area -- such as agricultural uses and raising of animals. In order to ensure that the property is utilized for this group home development, which is compatible with area zoning and other area development, staff is recommending that if a reclassification is permitted, a restrictive covenant be filed in conjunction with the rezone limiting the uses permitted on the subject site to a group home for a .maximum of six developmentally disabled adults. If the proposed group home is not developed as approved by the City, the property should revert to R-1, Single-Family zoning. c. That since the last previous land use analysis of the area zoning of the subject property, authorized public improvements, permitted private development or other circumstances affecting the subject property have undergone significant and material change. The subject area has been extremely stable with respect to zoningiand use since the original designation of this neighborhood in 1969. Little development activity has occurred in this area since the Northeast Renton Area Plan was adopted. Annexations have occurred in the immediate area during the last five (5) years. The City during the past year improved Uhion Avenue N.E. The Northeast Renton Section of the Comprehensive Plan speaks to the need to ensure the availability of adequate public services, utilities and infrastructure to serve this area of the City prior to, or in conjunction with new development in this vicinity. In order to address this objective, the City has customarily required that developers include in developments some provision for construction of and/or support of all necessary improvements to these services, utilities and infrastructure. As a result of these on-going improvements, adequate services, utilities and infrastructure are generally available to the proposed group home. Where it is determined that these facilities require further improvement, the staff is recommending that the proponent be required to do so. Preliminary Report to Hearing Examiner Good Shepherd of Washington Page 5 A last criteria that is used to evaluate the appropriateness of a rezone is that of timeliness of the request. The proposed reclassification of the property to G-1, General Use Zone, to accommodate the group home is consistent with the type and density of land uses which are now present and are anticipated for the area. The subject site is an infill site in the City and is adequately served by City services. As discussed above, the applicant will need to upgrade some of the services to meet the immediate needs of the project. Since the rezone of the site to a large lot single family designation (G-1) will not place an unnecessary burden on City services and the proposed use is compatible with area developments, staff believes that the request for reclassification of the subject property to G-1, General Use Zone is timely. 5. Section 4 .478 (C) lists eleven criteria that the Hearing Examiner is asked to consider along with all other relevant information in making a decision on a Conditional Use application. These include the following: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT a. Comprehensive Plan: The proposed use shall be compatible with the general purpose, goals, objectives and standards of the Comprehensive Plan,• the Zoning Ordinance and any other plan, program, map or ordinance of the City of Renton. The Comprehensive Plan and the Zoning Ordinance both designate the subject property specifically, and the area as whole, for single-family residential development. The applicant proposes a single-family style, six bedroom group home intended to house six developmentally disabled adults. This use, together with the rezone action described above, is consistent with the general Comprehensive Plan Residential Policies (particularly Policy A. 5 regarding the dispensing of group homes throughout the City) , and the Northeast Renton Area Plan listed in the City of Renton Comprehensive Plan Compendium. The proposed use is permissible as a conditional use in the G-1 (General Use) zone in the City's Zoning Code. The Comprehensive Plan Compendium addresses Residential Development Goals in the Policies Element Section, General Goals, Objectives and Policies IV. In that Section, the goal is "to encourage suitable housing and living environments" and the objective is to create "sound, viable neighborhoods. " The proposed development is intended to provide a family-style environment for six developmentally disabled adults in a residential structure which has been • designed to both meet the needs of this special population and to be compatible with the character of the local single- family residential neighborhood. The proposed development is to be located on a vacant, unimproved piece of property and, as such, it is anticipated that the group home -- including • the structure and the surrounding on-site amenities (e.g. landscaping, screening) -- will enhance the property and the local community. Specific policies in the Residential Section of the Comprehensive Plan encourage the provision of housing "to suit a variety of family sizes, age groups, life styles, and income levels" and the provision of equal "opportunity for all residents to obtain sound housing. " These policies also encourage group homes to be "dispersed throughout the City. " The proposed development would be the first group home for the developmentally disabled in the City of Renton. (There is a second proposal which has been submitted by the applicant for_ another group home for the developmentally • Preliminary Report to Hearing Examiner Good Shepherd of Washington Page 6 • disabled in Northeast Renton -- the application is presently under consideration. There is an existing foster care facility including two group homes for juveniles in North Renton, located on Lake Washington Boulevard. ) The desirability of the group home concept and the need for group homes for the developmentally disabled in communities located in King County was documented in December, 1987 in a study by King County, entitled Bridging the Housing Gap (See Appendix "C") . This study addresses the major issues facing the developmentally disabled and reports that recent judicial decisions have mandated de-institutionalization (of the developmentally disabled) and the creation of residential alternatives in the community. These alternatives are viewed as providing opportunities for " integration of the developmentally disabled into normal life styles, and supporting provision of services in settings which are `less restrictive than institutions. Findings in this King County study are supported in the American Planning Association Zoning News of May, 1988, which states that "Community based housing for persons with developmental disabilities and mental illnesses belongs in residential neighborhoods-not in central business districts or other commercial zones. " (page 1) . This article also reports that the American Psychiatric Association has stated that the "single most critical factor" preventing the rational discharge of patients and the effective coordination of community based services is "lack of provision for adequate specialized housing for the chronically . . .disabled. " (page 2) .. The proposed project would begin to implement the concept of residential alternatives for the developmentally disabled in this community. It would provide housing to "suit a variety of . . . life styles and income levels" and offer a "sound housing" alternative for six developmentally disabled adults as recommended by the Comprehensive Plan. The Zoning Code for the City of Renton (Section 4-704) permits group homes in the G-1 (General Use) zone as a conditional use with the requirement that the use conform to development standards delineated in the Code. The project design for the Good Shepherd Group Home, with required mitigation measures, will conform to standards for lot size and lot dimensions and for structural dimensions. The structure is located on the site in a manner which meets or exceeds setback requirements -- the structure was located in a manner which affords a maximum level of privacy to the residents and to neighboring property owners. Fencing and landscaping have also been required to exceed minimum requirements to provide better visual buffering and noise containment with respect to this development. The Comprehensive Plan for the Northeast Section of Renton, which includes the subject property, notes that the current and potential availability of public services, utility and transportation systems must be considered in evaluating applications for new development. The proposed six resident, single-family style home is slated to be constructed in an area which is now ready to accommodate such a development. The area is zoned for single-family style residential use and much of the land is already developed with homes. There are a number of vacant properties as well. The Public Works Department, Police Department and Fire Prevention Department report that City. services generally meet or exceed local community requirements. Where improvements to facilities are required (such as street lighting, curbing, undergrounding of utility lines) the applicant and the City will work together to develop a plan for the applicant to provide those improvements. • Preliminary Report to Hearing Examiner Good Shepherd of Washington Page 7 Additionally, the home is planned for an area which is near shopping centers, personal services (e.g. medical, dental) , a variety of community facilities and public transit lines. The Comprehensive Plan encourages residential development in locations where these amenities exist. The State Division of Developmental Disabilities and the King County Board for Developmental Disabilities requires that group homes be proximate to these services; the proposed site for the group home has been approved by the State and the County. b. Community Need: There shall be a community need for the proposed use at the proposed location. In the determination , of community need the Hearing Examiner shall consider the . following factors, among all other relevant information: 1. The proposed location shall not result in either the detrimental overconcentration of a particular use within the City or within the immediate area of the proposed use. At present there is no group home for the developmentally disabled in the City of Renton. There is a second application for a group home in process. If both homes are approved, there will be housing for a total of 12 developmentally disabled persons in the City of Renton. The development of one or two such homes within City limits is well within reasonable limits of "concentration" of this use. The proposed group home is slated to be located in the Northeast Section of Renton. The second proposed home is slated to be located within a mile of this home (at Olympia Avenue, south of N.E. 10th Place) . The proximate location of the homes has been proposed to enhance the efficiency of operations of these facilities. Both homes are being proposed by the Good Shepherd of Washington, a church based organization. The Bethlehem Lutheran Church is located in the vicinity of both proposed homes (the subject site and site on Olympia Avenue N.E. ) The applicant's contact person, in discussions with Zoning staff, has indicated that the church will be providing services to the homes, including but not limited to sponsorship of cultural and recreational activities, vehicles and drivers to transport residents, volunteers to assist residents, and administrative assistance to staff members. For these reasons, it would not be inappropriate to locate both homes, ' if both homes are approved, at the proposed sites. Additionally, there is precedent for locating two group homes of similar character in the same area of the community within the guidelines of the Comprehensive Plan. The two Griffin group homes for juveniles are located in close proximity to one another on the Lake Washington Boulevard. (See Appendix "A" for Locational Criteria) 2 . That the proposed location is suited for the proposed use. The proposed location for the Good Shepherd Group Home is well-suited for a six-person residence for the developmental disabled. The lot is flat and large, approximately 36, 000 square feet, and so can accommodate the proposed 2, 528 square foot residence, fencing and landscaping comfortably. The lot is vacant so that no residential displacement will occur. There is wild vegetation on the lot, but no endangered plant or animal life is known to exist on the site. The site is adequately served by City services as well as being near a Metro bus line. In addition, the site is Preliminary Report to Hearing Examiner Good Shepherd of Washington Page 8 located near shopping centers and medical services, and other community services. c. Effect on Adjacent Properties: The proposed use at the proposed location shall not result in substantial or undue adverse effects on adjacent property. The following site • requirements shall be required: 1. Lot Coverage: Lot coverage in residential districts (R-1 and R-2) shall not exceed fifty percent (50%) of the lot coverage of the zone in which the proposed use is to be located. Lot coverage in all other zones shall conform to the requirements of zone in which the proposed use is to be located. The proposed group home is approximately 2528 square feet. The lot is 36, 000 square feet. Thus, lot coverage will be approximately seven percent (7%) , well within the fifteen percent (15%) limitation established for the G-1, General Use Zone. The proposed structure will also be well within the fifty percent (50%) coverage limitation set for the R-1, Single-Family Residential Use Zone area in the vicinity of the subject property, and, therefore, compatible with other housing in the area. 2 . Yards: Yards shall conform to the requirements of the zone in which the proposed use is to be located. Additions to the structure shall not be allowed in any required yard. The proposed yards for the group home meet or exceed all requirements for the G-1, General Use Zone. The planned front yard is approximately thirty feet; the requirement for front yards for this zone is 20 feet. The proposed rear yard is approximately sixty feet; the required rear yard is 25 feet. The proposed side yards are approximately sixty feet on the east side and approximately 100 feet on the west side of the property (the required side yards are five (5) feet) . In addition to conforming to development standards for the G-1, General Use Zone, the proposed development, as sited, meets or exceeds standards for the surrounding R-1, Single-Family Residential Use Zone. 3 . Height: Building and structure heights shall conform to the requirements of the zone in which the proposed use is to be located. Spires, belltowers, public utility antennas or similar structures may exceed the . height requirement upon approval of a variance. Building heights should be related to surrounding uses in order to allow optimal sunlight and ventilation, and minimal obstruction of views from adjacent structures. The proposed home is designed to be sixteen (16) feet in height, well within the thirty-five (35) height limitation set for both the G-1, General Use Zone and for those properties in the area which are zoned R-1, Residential Use Zone. The home has been designed as a one-story structure to provide for maximum mobility for the residents and to maximize staff efficiency. In conformance with conditions established by the Environmental Review Committee, the structure has been situated at a point. on the site well away from adjacent properties to provide privacy to residents and neighbors, and to minimize obstruction of area views. Landscaping is planned to enhance site and neighborhood ambience. Preliminary Report to Hearing Examiner. Good Shepherd of Washington Page 9 • d. Compatibility: The proposed use shall be compatible with the residential scale and character of the neighborhood. The proposed group home has been planned specifically to be similar in size, scale and design to neighboring single- family residences. . The home is proposed to be 2528 square feet in size, to be a single-story, ranch-style structure. Materials proposed for siding, roofing, window treatment and other features have been selected to be compatible with those materials used in near-by structures. An open four space parking area has been located next to the home for staff, service providers, vehicles to take residents to appointments and outings, and visitors. ' The lot size of approximately 36, 000 square feet (proposed through. rezone of the property to G-1, General Use) is similar td lot sizes of neighboring General Use properties, and somewhat larger than many of the neighboring R-1, Single-Family Residential Use zone, properties. The lot will be developed with the above-described 2700 square foot home and the adjacent parking area. The remainder of the property will be landscaped and screened in a manner which is complementary to area developments. e. Parking: Parking under the building structure should be encouraged. Lot coverage may be increased to as much as seventy five percent (75%) of the lot coverage requirement of the zone in which the proposed use is located if all parking is provided underground or within the structure. /Ord. 3903 , 4-22-85) The applicant has proposed an open parking area adjacent to the residence. The area will have four spaces, as required by the Parking and Loading Ordinance. Residents of the home will not drive. The parking area is intended for use by staff members, volunteers, visitors, service providers, and to accommodate a vehicle which will be used to take residents to a variety of business appointments and recreational outings. f. Traffic: Traffic and circulation patterns of vehicles and pedestrians relating to the proposed use and surrounding area shall be reviewed for potential effects on, and to ensure safe movement in the surrounding area. It is estimated that a total of 12 vehicle trips will be generated daily from the proposed group home development. This count includes those trips made by four staff members, volunteers, visitors, and service providers (deliveries, medical services, etc. ) . The residents will not drive. The ITE Trip Generation Manual reports that a single-family residence generates an average daily count of ten trips. Pedestrian trips generated from the proposed development are anticipated to include those trips made by staff members travelling to and from work on near-by public transit lines, and those trips made by residents accompanied by staff or visitors on neighborhood outings. Residents will not be permitted to leave the grounds without a responsible supervisor. Staff analysis indicates that traffic. impacts to the site and to the neighborhood' will be minimal. It is recommended, however, that the applicant be required to make street improvements along the N.E. 19th Street corridor to increase safety levels and enhance compatibility between the site and neighboring properties. Improvements should include widening of N.E. 19th Street in front of the subject property; installation of curbs, gutters, and sidewalks; installation of street lighting; undergrounding of street lighting cables to accommodate future improvements. Preliminary Report to Hearing Examiner Good Shepherd of Washington Page 10 g. Noise, Glare: Potential noise, light and glare impacts shall be evaluated based on the location of the proposed use on the lot and the location of on-site parking areas, outdoor recreational areas and refuse storage areas. As a result of the fact that there will be six developmentally disabled residents and four staff members at the group home, it is possible that there may be a higher level of noise generated from this site than is generated from many of the adjacent residences. This noise may be generated both from residents during the course of routine daily activities, and by staff members in the parking area during shift changes. In order to minimize impacts of sound from the site upon the neighborhood, staff has recommended a number of mitigating measures as conditions for approval of the application to construct the proposed group home. The home will be screened by extensive landscaped areas and by wood fencing at least four feet high along the N.E. 19th Street frontage and at least six feet high along the sides and rear of the property to further contain noise from the home and from the parking area. Staff analysis indicates that light and glare emanating from this development will be generated only by vehicles traveling to and from the site. It is not anticipated that this impact will be significant in itself, nor substantially different from levels of light and glare generated by other area residential properties. Recommended conditions for screening of the property by landscaping and wood fencing will serve to provide a visual buffer against any light and glare from vehicle trips. h. Landscaping: Landscaping shall be provided in all areas not occupied by buildings or paving. The Hearing Examiner may require additional landscaping to buffer adjacent properties from potentially adverse effects of the proposed use. The landscaping will include plantings which are compatible with those on neighboring properties -- including grassy areas, flowers, shrubs and (evergreen, deciduous and fruit) trees. The ERC has recommended that the plantings required for this property be more dense than those required in the general area, in order to provide on-site amenities as well as providing separation between the site and neighboring properties for the purpose of minimizing visual impact and light and glare impacts from this development. It has also been recommended that a condition be placed upon the permit to require that the applicant develop and implement a landscaping maintenance plan, subject to' approval by the City to ensure the continuing quality of appearance of this site. It is also recommended that the applicant be required to install a cedar fence around the periphery of the property to further enhance visual screening for this development. The fence is proposed to be four feet in height along the N.E. 19th Street frontage and will be six feet in height along the side boundaries and along the entire rear boundary of the property. i. Accessory Uses: Accessory uses to conditional uses such as day schools, auditoriums used for social and sport activities, health centers, convents, preschool facilities, convalescent homes and others of a similar nature shall be considered to be separate uses and shall be subject to the provisions of the use district in which they are located. The applicant has proposed to develop a six bedroom home, and a four space, uncovered parking area adjacent to and immediately east of the home. No accessory uses have been proposed. Preliminary Report to Hearing Examiner Good Shepherd of Washington Page 11 j . Conversion: No existing building or structure shall be converted to a conditional use unless such building or structure complies, or is brought into compliance, with the provisions of this Chapter. This condition is not applicable since the subject property is not developed. k. Public Improvements: The proposed use and location shall be adequately served by and not impose an undue burden on any public improvements, facilities, utilities and services. Approval of a conditional use permit may be conditional upon the provision and/or guarantee by the applicant of necessary public improvements, facilities, utilities and/or services. The property is served by water and sewer lines and by a storm drainage culvert along the property frontage at N.E. 19th Street. The Public Works Department has indicated that these public improvements are adequate or can be improved to be adequate to serve the proposed development. The applicant will be required to assume a share in maintaining present services and future improvements to services through participation in systems development, special assessment area charges, and approved plans for water and sewer systems. The Public Works Department of the City of Renton is recommending that the applicant be required to provide the following: a) street lighting; b) an extension of conduit under the sidewalk for future street lighting; c) overhead conductors to clear luminaries (to be coordinated with Puget Power) ; d) off-site improvements including widening of N.E. 19th Street, and installation of curbs, gutters and sidewalks. The Fire Prevention Department of the City of Renton is recommending that the applicant be required to provide the following, prior to occupation: a) a Fire Department access road/lane paved to a minimum width of twenty (20) feet; b) a primary hydrant within 150 feet of the structure and a secondary hydrant within 300 feet of the structure; c) an approved automatic smoke detection system; d) a manually activated Class III alarm systm. D. DEPARTMENTAL RECOMMENDATIONS: 1. The Hearing Examiner should recommend approval of the reclassification of the subject site froth R-1 to G-1 to the City Council subject to the following conditions: The filing of Restrictive Covenants, running with the land, which require that the property be developed as a group home to house a maximum of six developmentally adults. In addition the property were not developed within a period of one year from the adoption of this reclassification, or if the group home use is discontinued for., any cause, that the zoning classification should revert to R-1, Single-Family Residential Use; and 2. The Hearing Examiner should approve the application for a • conditional use permit to allow the development of a group home for six developmentally disabled adults on the property, subject to: a. Compliance with the Determination of Non-Significance - Mitigated, dated May 9, 1988, for the proposed project; b. Development of an approved plan for on-going maintenance of landscaping and screening upon the subject property; Preliminary Report to Hearing Examiner . Good Shepherd of Washington Page 12 c. Development of an approved plan for construction of street improvements and utility lines as recommended by the Public Works Department. °i , . • , . . :. s I ,-,Av -_—,74 ;..... r- _ _ _ _ __ .4. _ c. 1 4 .1, 1 i. 4.. ....1?. 1.; i• et :. ob. il 1: rit 1 11) Tiliii. 'T---7-'':.;- - • -; . ir, . • . . Elk, ,IA ----ii- �u 101 = ' ,11 204 • . .;. .. . � • is ''lla, � 1 r I .w. •I . �.�� , �. fC, •G.- 1 w• • n 11 1 I I i,e• s 7\' " : .s CD ..�r i • • I,. t 1• •, . ,/'S t''o, ._, ,c r'1•V a / a4. Spla,74.4•. 1 •h•\11 • .0 , �r �! \e.l 1 1 I s . ., '.l e. ., t. rf • #74,...., ° as a. tee �I N(O' •'1 �- } 1 1I 1 �� '� l7_. .. 6t sa mi:itikt O?aset t. fe, I�'QV � . Y . ---- 4 t 1 t.. j• 6 ,5 •, El III �,7� r' • •' . .e e • 1 I - it l314rS G111 isiv .o., .1 i7 .4 .t 411. 11-2 G 1 i • . •, •• • • tt�o ./ •1 t.q R ... a r 0 • 1 , 1 't iiFt......, . • •. 4" F.L1.4_,..g:.; I, \ r.7. tr._ Fril G.-1 ,.. .: .1 • .. ,s4 . 11,F.I. 1 1 _ • GOOD SHEPHERD GROUP HOME FOR THE DEVELOPMENTALLY DISABLED FILES: R-010-87, CU-010-87 (REZONE & CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT) APPLICANT GOOD SHEPHERD OF WASHINGTON TOTAL AREA 0.847 ACRE PRINCIPAL ACCESS N.E. 19th STREET EXISTING ZONING R-1, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL EXISTING USE UNDEVELOPED PROPOSED USE SIX (6) RESIDENT GROUP HOME FOR THE DEVELOPMENTALLY DISABLED. COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN SINGLE FAMILY COMMENTS PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF N.E. 19th STREET AT THE 3900 BLOCK, BETWEEN UNION 'AVENUE N.E. AND SHELTON AVENUE N.E. _L, ••••'•:,:::.::..V:::i.i it . . ,. • • , LAND USE LEMENT • , .. . ... ., ,. . • . , . • i . ,• ( 1 1 I Single Family ... ..I : Commercial : I., . . ----- :•; . .. 0,, . •. • 1, III Low Density ........... ............ ::•:•:.:•:•:•:•••••••:• Multl-Family , W • Office" Office ' Park - - • ,.... ..: 1 ' I , ••••••• ••••• . . ...:.•i'.•;:. Medium Density ...:::::::::::::::::::•,••.•:.:: Multi-Family .....000 . .....00.00... . • .. ..*:' Public/Quasi-Public 00.. 0 . .0.0.00. ... ... . • (''..9'. . .•••••::?.••:.••:.•%.••:.•%.••!:,.:.:.•••••••..••••• . , • . op .........,„........,......... High Density 1 I Light Industrial cx. 1 •••••••..•........ _ ••••••-"" -:-. MUlti-Family i . 1 . . • • • • --.....„._ •tx;4.ii:, /:_....- ...:.?,%.. .;:.(.:_ .,.... . •' ' ' ' Heavy Industrial • • • ...•-...-„,;,...,..••,•,.,...=,...:,.-.• • /.:•.: • • • L•-,1 c:..1...3i. :-!:,f;.:"?......til.....e:".f,i,.:.',-.• .1,-•,:::. ' ''c$.f Recreation .7.4 • • ,..'7:Xt•'••.'i::••••' .5!.'it:-.;.-F.51?..,...,..7,v':'' .i•::::.=:•4,-;;::,,;:..,-2 t...c.e.,,,..,,c,,i,.. :-....; 1;?......c:3::41v,76,:;-:,;:•..:„,,r...?.v. . 5-e...4:::",f;:i., , ,--cs.;,......,,,, , ,,,,T,-,....r:••:••:-.7.:•••c`,:1'.1F....., SP.E.i.ce.zur; ur .1,,,i,:',,,,,,=,•••••• eenbelt • ..........-. ,: ,;:,•:;_....6•.;:,...,.r.,.;-•::i..•• ••,•.,„..-.:,:•;7..,,„ • •i. r•44'6 •C•L,•• -_-:1=::1-.=-_---_ Manufacturing Park ---- / Multiple Option ..-e,,• .a.,„ •,..c.;.F::?'''...•:•-•. ..•:,,-,;,;V.v.-.i;,•••••'0•, ..&-' 'e..:::•••••••1:• •.:-0..-.,r. .: ....."I'6•*;I+ :C4:::-.,;,.':;?6:14.. ilh' t.. Revised April 1985 , 1- .e-',3 ft.% .....',. '14. '7.• Oa . 1.'7.....L...t•••.R. '".. . • ''''''-•••••:',..w• 6 '•-•••'.. 4.,4..e., ••.• ,.. .... c,;.,-Irgo....:sv . . litt:7....4 i..,•-• ' 00000000. hint ftr.• 0.., • .. •.0.0.0.0.00000.00. -. •• "" • ; WA -171--, ...______,' •0...,.,4. t.,.\....,............., • ••• . 5:71';::"•::::Z.rli MIN 1111;.._-7-....:;•1 Car - •• .3. • <77, I . •vi:i:i:i:::..-''.;),,r,; .% '':::::':•*!:•:::::;:::;;::;;.,-:'1:.q'...1_ MIIIIIII a . ,., . ,......., , • •., . • •,,, . .• . .. . . • ,/..0°0°6 Igg•:,-,.:::::. .0,•- ,..•;•.,. .. • . - \.....__ t.°..:070:- •-:-:,:. :::;* ,.: ,4:9_,::.;,-,..:5...:;.:::,..,,. i iii ..,m;.,,,, ,- •ift4.-„,.::.:•• e. IN . ";4i-';' . .jk 6,4% . '.f... •,. -:•;..EN ..."-1. 01 L' '..i.,i- Nalna A••0 . • 'i.-. • ...,..t.... .... ,, Iiiiiiiiir, ------. • . , . ..,,,,,,,,,,,..„.„.„....,, . . • . .... . ......,:, • •.000. j ..,.. Ilhi.,:,........,....i. .. ...._ .i , •1111•0•111 `416...',.',... .00000 42., imr.oil .;! r . ..... . i,..0.00.0...r. ,..._.J.,•.. „,,,,,. ,,,, ...0 .. .s. ...... .. _ .., ,teRFAvi. ••. 0.0.•. ..,., f______ . r __.. . , . --------.,,,.....rt • el,::,::::m::,iiiiIiiiiiIii. .0.00.• •J 5•:_••._••i•1_,11•...E.Ii-1..6t.li..k.•i tI t1.:•i...•:1•.ii•:1,::1:•A 0\gK,:•i:711,•:c1::•i.•::•:.,!::•:..i:1•:.t-'i,::"i.i.::i-•.r-;k:::i.:ii,::-:::':.1,:::,..tf:.l;::i:71N:-r:i.:*.....4..00.i1.-..0.-0..r-.0..0Z.i-t I1ihi...i•g1.1a.11_;7:i1,Np t_Mm1 w,s1 1.1iUMr4a:pii 0pIMngAoNIl4e 1 oE,.:ri.,.rMiIre I4tIRAV41.l%%M l l"1/"•r;i.a4A•.LPoq..1,:,M :M4:mw..:0..:am..wl.:..:,„l%,.•1WN:M1.xI.:I:i.m:,1. •'i: a.'4i m.M•1.o.•M.mw._.Mo0.4.Mm2.4 M.t 1i.1a,...:•.m0.:.-;\:m0.i::0:i;:i00i.:l I.i:.mm:..°‘::L0 n:-pm:00.:..•:tu.:0:0•l.:.0.•iiu.•i..•i.•_:il.'i....g .-......:...J-:I..:i:...1:.:....:i:l.:.i.•.:i.;:.i..:*1.......i...... .. •. !11;•..i.ii.i iii:i0:i:iNi0i11i%0i i0:0%0:::0i.0.•i%0 00001 *•1 .,...1,...•6,r = 9.• 1 1 0.000000.o % . 0. . 11 • .1i i . I. •..:.•_rc..t:01= 71 oo...00•.oo. •• :\. •. , •, .\1 ..,. ;•c.. 111"glimmi 'ON'_,11141111b•,..,,..L.L.' ----....------'--. - IIIIiiiiiiiiiiiiii- ', ...':.."0-/7.7.7.7.7".::::::::: • i .....F-77-7777°•• i 1 ow es NEI •::i:::i..7...er••••--- ..::::::::•:•:•::-.- ilargi . i •••••....„................. . • .•. . . • . . . :0:0°00:. I Eil I .:••, -::::::::op-:•• ...,..:K:: 000000000.0.0.00000..0000000000.0..0..., ......... _II____ .:.:•:•:••••••-7- ...........;.:•:.:•::::::::::: 1 0 0 0 0 00000.000.0..0000093000000000.0 iiairip...i:1:i:i:i:A.:1:1:::isi::::•:.:•:•:.:.:.....::„ MI 4' .:... ••:...*::::::::::::::::::::::::: .°0°0°0°0 0 0 0 0 0•0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0• :•••••• •••••••::::::.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:•::::::::::::::.:::i:::.:1::::::::::::::::::i:i:1::.:i•::::: ' ' 4:.•:.•::::..•:.•:•.:.:••.::.::.::.:::.::.:.:::.:;* 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0•0 0 0 0000000000000 .. . .0. .::.:.:::i::::::.. ....:...:.......:0........ ........... ''''' •?••••.••.•••:•:.•:;:.,:::::::::*.::::::.::• "00°00000°00°•"OM%0 0 0 0 0 0. L.: •0 0 ::• • •• '5'"....1.v..., .':.•:....:•..i.:•:•:::::::::•:•::*::. •0(5.0 0 0 0 0 0 0•0 0 0 0000000000V .......:.: n.00. 111 ••• 0 ;•••• ' ..K::::*K:K:K:K:K:::::: Ob 0 0 0 0 0 0 0•000000000000000000 0 0 0 0 0. 1......7.r.. '7.??,. I .*0.0% ":, %.::.:::i:K:i*i:i::::::::K: .°8309,V0W0V0.0 0 c,0.0 0. 0000• ., -::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: 00.7,00.0000000.0000.00000.• , .x.:..........,:. . (.1, I •.,a:,0 0 i.. :•:•::::::::::::::::::::::.:.: •.0.0.0.0 0.....0.00000 0 0 , ., •,e. ' , .°.°0°0910%o% . ....:::Iiiliffi.:: ... ,. .:;..; Foo:o:o:o:o:o:o:•• '....'::i::::::ii :i;:;i •• . •0000•000 • all 0.fr . • 0000,000• “0000.1:. idEM . -':,,;•.:44 ..................:...... . 009„00000000.000. ....t.7. ..: .:::. :;: IIIIIMMIM ., ma siii, '1, viiiiiiiiiimil .,..p..-,.•0.•0•000• .1,,,.. ::,:,„,::•::•::•:: -- • r : yip . . ..„.,..,..e4c,........„.„. ../....;, :::::::::::::::::::::: . . .,...,,.;,..,...„.s.,...•„.„4:.,„ ::::::::.:.:.:.:::::.: , ..::::,i:ii:, ,,.. ....:.:..... ..:....i.7,3)'....f.igs.-.9•••••••••,icio":•We)1.0.•. .....::::::::::::.:.::: "A7'. -.; t V.iii.77-, • '4,i,-1••;'•".`Zo"..:1 ;,:;.;cf,/,."r;••••e'JA,- :•:::.:•:::::::::::::::: •,. ...,„. a 1 • ...,'',1:fi-.4;)••?d•?,f.P.:".?•:ri•;;F:1);?, iffel:.%?),.:';';•?;"a. /r;ill l'iy:*:::::::'::i:i:i dr . 3.1:k. ci.j:!. • tniN7P.'15.,,V,,i0,%: :,`P,t1 •. '•'':='..'6 IA')"”;:' .:•i,.h.,: •• rj.`" . • •ci •(1 i•-•'' ' imml°.'";• -i•-''''''''' •'1-'Fil..:1';.• • cr'c• . ••%. , --..;•:`,..i,,.......-.'"0., • 11111 -mow i••••••••.;.----- - "14- ''''41. ec-1;,i.-• ••?:.%.,7.,:ee....4....o..---,„•-ors•ori.,. - - -.... lift.i... %..n i ::-r • rt -,.. .,c1 ,,,..v..,,v, . ',4414.%; "-- ' , ,-4%:' lik, .'.'..1E'Cilci''' i'''.'•'''':;:•,.•J.L:1-.': '- ,... '....:,. ..,-, ..- ....1;1,P,IC;;.111.?.:•,lii'• ilk1/4. 1P:411,am,41117t:t..e*FP. cAtk`'.:0';..f.r',•T'v.rl•.!,.Q.-)1.,1".,:q..... '1 o',v.:.•s'xi..'i l . ••••••• .47.,.•( :Ai;(.......• V., ;•V••..... .. lab r c C ,t • :•;.1:;131i; .)1.,••,;.1:P!.,':'`'....L.T.'!:•Y'lp.t...(.11:!;..tb.'.1, ".', '''''....41111.• .5-•':.1,.4.'rr I '''" •• 114111 AI%P.l';5;' .1.'"eg;5?...03.•.• ;343. /LOA f•:'AVVVP60,i ,!P:I^P.=.1"•!;j•• ..1Y/.. '• •-•-... ..'IN,' Scr;6;.... .V.•(*t ' ir,...(T,s,: , ) ..:-,41.0•Q•• 0,rem,/,•5`,ECS..“..'<';.':.:11. Q.-'.-- • --N , -c.c.0.R-,0 -4.•(,,f,,-,e.'12; -'r CO A-..,•1 '• •. 0,,,.0•?, .:".-1• :V••f's:••er,4•'',:: ..o..).i.,‘,..64.-10,,,,,:-1.,;;.c.q.,..fv,.. p,,e.•'...cs,...2: ..."-" ...Vie:A,(N.-it;ir.r4" f(--. M. '-'.'t?Eg• 1. .,(5?-•:.4 ie,i.:1'.4sA;CA../...2i.41...v,..,;,, 12s-(el'lei:it-"W;?,'1!;`;'::'II',A•••*•;•?• "• • .. • f Jc•tlyFcater jr._ ...'' :?.??,'.•0•• ••di 4•;',.tl.....,0 . r...r.•,..7 .16 0.,,p1.0.,, _______ -(..,• .„$1....e.,.. . c• .,.. , 1/41 I , ••• . .11%. ti . 't".;0,:...-.,••,,,...,.•:••.6-..r.0.•t-1,7..tv•i ... 4.3:,., ,,.. ,., .„.,;,.,„11) , ,. r ev , . ' :.‘ i••""'6".?•••••"...:X14'...?..v7,..•%••••';!; ••••P':'"?:7 . . • •ts:3 n't (i'n•l••C t"'•••••"c.,W-....,%.t) ..1‘. 4.V..it..,••11 ••• •p v.. ..• '-•17r.Cr-4.)•' "."...:.'L,iO t.44-.••',t,I ir,l•••1,1•S-4N'o6-..PC.':.,..C:.V"'...;C't.•1''1V3,:,,,.?",.1..t./o1.76r,'•t•i,!4•,4.u,,b.1•-•;-)••0•0.-. ..0' : '••••, e..o t •• „f,3,•0 ,. '"• •6):..i..fs •0$ ..!:.•P.' ..0..,.• j p...v 4r. nr, ,,g,:..<:oeil.T;:,••.p,:;•.AS',:',.•,,IS.,?..,1,.,,:,6,‘,.p,:50.,;A?.•; , „,,..-' 41sio., ,....elfrerp es.`,..•,• ,..0, ..;:.4%:. Atet e N...., :i',.:y?)...Y...r.P.•.:,. .. (mewl.,•, .e'' Ils•Niv.,ie,..;N•,‘?„0•74,•';‘.:P-.W . "t. •ir••••,p,,q,.. . •-•-e-•,••,"tAC:41.t'Ec$,:7- •-I-t-•kk.friO4.•Ar•••re• '''*We,4-c`c•V•i;i••:•".1'rek; t.-4.0. •• . • .1,!;e•''Af5.63.11).,- - ,, . .00006• tiiiiiiiiiiiii:i:i:ii:Iiiii:::-.. '>11 ;037,..), • • •• .....C4 e&c..44:v,:ce.v.tse 4. ' ..",.r••••!;-,39..k;6.,..1'0, :,•b.7,49p.p•Of,t3;:i• .• •0000 .... V•11.(14:91'.r.fAlr . "...5'.?••.1.' ..''.7.;n'•.1 .:.\Ca%• /IL .•.....„..3::::::,::::,:„.5:52.,.. ..:„.,•,•:•,,.„ 4 /1. , ___:.. .,,,„,.v. „,:t,, .ipp.. • .. ‘0,:i• •• ,.. ...„,.. ...., • •,,,..,...,..,. ., , ..),•,!, -•.•ce..4-..) iM)i,•' • •'A ,,,,t..,,P.; :. -.• :fitti: • tt, 1.1 s. .,, • ,!.r.;' - i ---..\. 7:111);"1 ' •'''...---1------. • .il•Ihre)61N. •0.0.. . .:.:,,. ••• •0000.'IP. •.b.78!CS..&'• .••:1St .,,.,•<.,n.:::!'„*.;•z•,.:.'%.?•/3.: * '1.:"1 ...-431 :.r • 0000 1•10 •:•:•:•:• : A ,-,ff••0000 s 0000c % '..'''''‘1,•en'''•;• • • ••••1.1.••'0.Pa,e4 IiiiP X‘,L.'. _ •••`'Aqic ZIA:\\ •0 0..,0„.0• IL •0000• nnn N , :0•5f0...:A?N':.(:_ '•••719 o ,n••.......',• :• ' '2.'....,. .•.•.•.••• • o � ----U aa- _— __ A ••. • Pi • • 1 • IPc IN TA" 2 • • .• , 2� �0 *•, : . 301 /.l y,4f. 2/7.S Rewroev OR } SDPC /00 305. 4Z/ 405.91 :.i '... RENnxJ ® �'.EAkre y e►R p • .H Z 1.� ORja Z;71 •ooA 1 Z� • py''• o" o N,^, 13011 A� I • �8 k o • o $ 3 ' �. • . k, k 2 .co „'), `‘ LY • • N22��Ib� I 0 7. •0 0' Z 0 1.a.•.. J$irE.rc SE. .[________ 0•l8 W 2 I '—• • ' . in k W A6.� r Bo Loq Z� ' • G 42AN-Os . ' 283 • , ... n • 4 0> �o/3o7y�2 ?h 3os.e/ +ti ;' y ^,20:5 • m ii. r/ t JJl . . Col- 4 A, IQCS 6 1. q _S ®,. ''` • ^+fir 00 PO to /tX1 Q7i ,:i .�1yi v,, i1. m ",;;.,.4n r_z -,r Its ' /2f o9B N.Hdi 3zn. .•A•i.4.J2//! 2/0 ' M.�1•14•w- ,� 23 /s ° O 5�1� y 'k o0 90 00/0 �� '�O' ~,; , y A`. IC3 �` 2 4a /moo > O.2/ 1- ,h • /zo ^ �. •0\ 11 oxio 0020 Z1 \N1,� ,10 96 630 4 N N e9. 2c•S9Ar n ;,. • "k ' ,l ` /24 2-fG 0 1y • v ko ° el P`G �°�ti : • xa;:r: re • � • i ,� /20 99t60 0 • • t;13� r • :�1 . V ';a;; � Ir.,,.. . ��•1 2 'y 4' /B I "� ti t') bN b a AC. ` 1\ ° .,;spy , 0. it . . • lb, $ ‘. • 1 10 *.D9,s I07T - ,1' ST. o : k • ; ;;,�;;?•,- T. s , ;..-4�;r,r i } *. . • �J; Ql k ; ,r ... V ;/O9.7L•4 •• VVI M a, Irk . S ,4; '�/ 0 40 b (( : ;, ,�fi' N:'�r; . J N el?. 1 • a`ek:VC!:j (;;; I.. .`,1 ,,,. y',.,,a'••• .' "111 2 ' " p 24 �G,is!t'•ya ' r; } tir1}j.:i , " i \,! /0.52 9z r k 11 h • y • drA} • CV:,r 4. ,�5..... Jpi�. ' 3 .ro /'Err en O R� b� .�- jyj `rz•;, ,44. •:j�',E'.}`��,a,��;:.n�'•t .E N O 0 9.2 .I .5. Bg p ��'/ Z 1:`;.i•; i,(;. •W• I 'r.. ,..5'.�"`.rij.�;i,Y,':',r; 4.M r S o co 2 3 og 79 �8¢ 7 41',4. 7'' ::,, rRENTOR/ �.169 . QOb j . N.; ...; • I '..;,: t%Vitiff:. �°9.4oK/ ,��02 � 1 �:r: ,�. ���-� J1" j :,^ • lipliti''',4- ;fARESTS OOK1T®WNHOUSES covo. ,.• 0•PHASE I • } _ ro ::!;.:1 %t' °..i VOL. 41/20 tg vBB .i,;: ,,. ir,�;. . , PHASE2 VOLvoL.a2/7 -09-vow s9 c ,f,:,''�•r, 9-8� 2 G. .�. '� i49r,}, ;! 14, 1',`1 1 ^ I 259.17 c1. ;. ;'i !d,.j9a:kn.': i, • . BROWN ROOF TAN SIDINCs 1 IJiT1 !E 00 I I!1 NORTH ELEVATION -5 LOWER . GLASS A GOIKPOSITION . . ~ SNNGLE ROOF 1 ANODIZED ALIPnNIM GUTTERS •RAN LEADERS I I,-� a TIGHT KNOT • J N CEDAR SIDING I :�FN FLOOR ELEv. , ANODIZED ALUM.WINDOWS / r�i Z rI EAST ELEVATION SCALE Vd•.I'-O• W/NSULATNG GLAZING O ki az—, xxE, d U Asti ctioa 00 _Ell • 0 0 . E E ---- r—---- - • f— r -- aka SOUTH ELEVATION SCALE:Vd••I'-0• N uZ l] _ — H 0 Fner. m WEST ELEVATION SCALE I/4°.F-0° Date A2 I 9g . NEW FIRE NTDRANT NE.19th STREET j NEWD•WATER EwSTIYa FlRE.ITORAA'TT-\ ! '1/CA _ _ _ _ — _ _ _ pCSTIG •].WATER AS. J EXIST.e•WATER EXISTING EDGE CF PATHS .� 1 V�f ppp —- NEW e_MN SEVER — - - --I�_ _ _�_�_�_�--_� I y•y( —. —4—_. .r --•__• -_____ •—� — A..I• �u-fir.—oneT.P.P.p���C1�� L -.\ fir"• --�EXSTea Pwe•R rope •.—— .—-——.——. I • 1 \ y .—PAVING EXIST.PNEa Z�?5, /-- _ , r♦EwrtemEuul.K—i \ \ ' I Epp / Ce -=—" \ �y _IPy__ I y --��Al—� RELOCATED KVFR POLE \ I 1 N . I / r•—•—•—•D>m'D' •—•—• 9 -T- RTLLR,-EAGQENT � \Y, �_SI-I-- s>dC \_._--d>m -\ °b ' I •-m•CHARNOCE. R I T v1 C \ F 2 I 11 FaarTm� TT �\ \it.1-3 1; \ \\�I —� 1 R—✓NWI®AR FENCE \ \ -A— IL1 I I 4_ I II T ...A•IOSTmaER CF enE \ \\I I� •I \ A]S \ I _ I L Iy TTTT \\\ \% \Qn ' — I I 1 Li .13 I i • I' m T m I y'.�°\ I i I 1 Z i. 1 I► -�' I —L.—A2n I I z • a �' T— I I ' I � C.TROUP HOME I II I z I II _— ATS \` Pet FL ELEV.d]S.• i L.——-- _ _ _ _ I I a o \ I I O = I I I / TTT /' \ F I I ' 1 / EXIerSG \ / I 7 1 N r_ I \ I I g.1 / °GiNO T' \ I I z II II I ./TO PE � <T, /f1 - I �� _ I 1 I II I 1T °TacvwlER DRANNELD / 1 a I I .I '"'"7-, 1 0l a a� I.F I I / �' . / / I 1 x0a'i _ s II z — J_�mmm J 9 A./ \ I I I G� 0ATT nT SITE PLAN A. i O Z • 2 pg PLANTINGOO SCHEDULE — _ 4 `� }o 6 6 d J o0 ICET LAWN NAME CQ?YN NAME CRORIGN . e� I IEMAR9 .ePACIY. -0 2'.0 CO c�o%\a no0�Og L oeee'�I—•— ii; Q re.%F'I 43'DER.FELIX ENGLU4 ITT R?T v o/c �roJJ L \ i LALIA o 0 'ITRI 11AR PATTER! III / i•C. k Vn F 00 8Q Q 1 Iuu u uI Mrr•ercCtlT C3LTCPAH DT.JLMWIGRI RAT TRI4•YarLdR PATTERN } n TT IIY 4 [• •l7 V IF., ,,FuI MCA CAR SA .WARE' I G.AL ]A•°/c - ;t. iiA., ) ueO, '�ION In y `a .IM1J �u I• CQJG PdYPC• J 0 • O D.CRASEFOLLIA W WiER BARBERRY I.AL !m•o/c u I v unO I CCNC. AVING P8 L N d) O RSbDOJETmRCN b.DTMAS CNEER I GAL 36•om ? yyyyyy,, ChG•CC,.POST FTG. W W m 6,,,..b I �'"'°off I 9 V•e•R=DAR TMRI POST z Q Q R Q RACpppEPORON 'JEAN MARE' I GAL SD•o/c I .. 3N O EXAM"JAPONICA J....DC TIIA I GAL ..o/c : I °e'a F. 'I Ii N 0 0 MEGA CALROR(ICA PACFIC WAX MYRTLE 2 GAL S•-m•o/c Y e1[f0e•n I FENCE Ft' ,, 0 FENCE DETAIL In z z i• T.OcctoENrALID CEDAR 845 S=•MPL >•-m•o/c LJ Q[ •.^ EAe'Oe I Sri1LE,h'. N J J 0 CLEROR PALIb1RIS PN OAK DID.IV CAL (---LAW. e) �;� PFSA.SERRCIA IaAv1A4 GERRI 1548.Iy CAL O LANDSCAPE PLAN � � . - W ,..mi. SCALE.r•]m'-m' Al • AC.ER R.RM FED MAPLE D.D.14.CAL ,_ tGAF SGA WRE TwagYw I'/I:�w\ f•-O'wG4 CEDAR I ISOI GTED u09E • P d>oalcaTED^ J • RA �ha0 AZ "p' 'NAST WIRE END: b'Ed>EYL'T UUUi ' }..- l'Alir Z L.NAILED TO,TAKE, N 5 1I} }-]R}NEM STAKES 0 \ \ \` • I B-• ROLLBACK BUR-AP • CO 1 IR /\--------/// ` /\ \ PLAlTSG SOLLI / I \ _ M SOIL>•TO�R 2 I- �y \I�� f—B4>M ABOVE GRADE A I \ nO Hi N w LAIN �/ /\ E NSLICK SURFACES U at-,,).3 a 1 N C ,c61I�w ` ^ J r✓ r D.GREATER TwAN ROOT BALL �'L Iti r //\ 111'4:441 ��'L1$• \I/� DECIDUOUS T2E PLANTING DETAILI Io 0O�� I w.0'000 �\IUg •1 I p A. / I /e a 1 / 1 f p' %/l� leil WIRES • I 1•i l GROUP HOME 13 Y �� I-- As. ROLL BACK Buwd- I ,OaJ' \\I/j I O ]ABTA•CEDAR STAKES CO 0 0.5 Ot O 0 b —•— NO SLICK SAFFACES o °O • /I\ 9 waT-' W • i _ ,o oeo i aYl 4D'GREATERT..ROOTB:;L g ¢w I o0 0 \I//•% 11 EVERGREEN TREE PLANTING DETAIL CO a. Ili TJR a°°p0000p°° pO�O�O�Q i 0052E I. p� °0 4®� CC9 CC 9 z I 04 . -1 , , , c,,,,) 00, ,, Oo / WW \O a/ F ,,,,, D 5D ED OOP, , 0 O ONEO.... }: Op / / \ / to o \II//, \I//, \I//� \I//•, �\I•.G, _\I//� \IU/ �\II/, \II/, \II `\\II �\Il/•� o o' O� Op �lIP� /I1\� /\\` %/\\` %/Ii� /IPA /I\\•� /I� %!\\� �1\\` !/I1�•� /I\\ OO Op \ QD O -� QD O �� r— GROUND COVER PLANTING PATTER. ILI N CEDAR FEN= NO SCALE 0 II I -.— • NE.leth ST LANDSCAPE PLAN a 0 -„ J o 2a6 TOP O >cAL=_r.b'-o• IA 0.0 M ROA04 ANGE¢ �.�G- 0 T/lCERED BO 9•G•c/c 4 KEY LAIN NA, CONCH NA, I�IDITION.SI= REMARKS.S-ACRG KEY LATIN WE.c CL•.'TUN NA, CONDITION.S:. FEI'IARKS,SPACING <Tw>:I4 : WARK iSJ-C4 ,S}RESTED POST Q,^ [,,0.NutB.I. '�i .I• P.NIGR6dWTW AV B`'AfX PANE BI CGL0 �- a ,.RANGB RAN_ w o I"., „1 .NEATNER '�'1'ICCEDd¢ B.D.]•OL'2 }CRC.PdvSG• iRIANWLA¢PdrTERA' #` C.DEODRA5 1�- N/'¢LPG rG TRH°1 ENCLOSURE u 0 I e o-eI tiEDlt[•i BARK I'LLCa ryMe91Y 3•DEEP OVE¢ NAI25 S`fOOTw S194RAJE W - PN O.K B D,I.C4 •S-•e/c SLICCK SURFACE, OFW. B £f•LARGE P.A.S.SOIL Z 0 B.CRASSFOLLIA WINTER BANSERRY ]GAL,].•TALL SO o/c 0 RY]1R PALU,tR:> ��• ��11� V F- BY1l1S1iItZF�M'.� S •.�A•GRNY£L R F N 0 RUODODtw�aON CNBtnA.9 CHEER ]G4.].•TALL 36•o/c pRryIS SERRJLI. KWAN:AY CERRY BM.I4.•CAL LduMc]T,'�-1♦ • - Q , m ;JEAN MARE' SG•o/c O RwoDODEtDRON ]GAL.].•Tdu ,lk w I EDGING DETAIL FENCE DETAIL SHRUB PLANTING DETAIL .p y�1I-r,lld JAPONICA Jr•P„TeE Bc;n.NLA } ,]f•ryy x,.c/� eia,. E l N y4pM! ACER REM, 1.0 MIRE BM,lki C.A. L� NO SCALE NO SCALE NO SCALE IL -l MYRICA CALFORNICA PACIFIC ILIAC MYRTLE ]GAL,N•TALL 5'-0•c/c P¢IIT TREES SEE FLAN 5.9 IL:CAL ORIGINAL ae CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST NO.: ECF-010-88 APPLICATION NO(S).: R-010-88; CU-010-88 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Proposal to rezone a .847 acre parcel from R-.1 (Single . . Family Residential) zoning to G-1 (General Use) zoning and application for a conditional use permit to develop a six resident, six bedroom group home for the developmentally disabled on the subject site. The portion of the site planned for development is presently • vacant; there is an existing house on the remaining property which will be retained. The area surrounding the site is zoned for single family residences and is generally so developed. Churches and other community service facilities are also in place in the area. PROPONENT: Good Shepherd of Washington LOCATION OF PROPOSAL:. The south side of N.E. 19th Street at the 3900 block, between Union Avenue and Shelton Avenue N.E. LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton, Building and Zoning Department. The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of an expanded environmental checklist and preliminary site plan, on file with the lead agency. Conditions were imposed as mitigation measures by the Environmental Review Committee under their authority of Section 4-2822(D) Renton Municipal Code (see attached sheet). These conditions are necessary to mitigate environmental impacts identified during the environmental review process. This DNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340. The lead agency will not act on this proposal for fifteen (15) days from May 9, 1988. Any interested party may submit written comments which must be submitted by 5:00 p.m., May 24, 1988, in order to be considered. A fourteen (14) day appeal period will commence following the finalization of the DNS. Responsible Official: Environmental Review Committee City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055 Phone: 235-2500 DATE OF DECISION: May 4, 1988 EFFECTIVE DATE: May 9, 1988Al - 7,Add nald G. Nelson . 1' ger Building and Zoning Director Po icy Deve is A ment Di tor Richard C. ughton Public Works Director • sigltr • . ORIGIN ' ^ � DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE l C • MITIGATION MEASURES ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST NO.: ECF-010-88 APPLICATION,NO(S).: R-010-88; CU-010-88 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Proposal to rezone a .847 acre parcel from R-1 (Single Family Residential) zoning to G-1 (General Use) zoning and application for a conditional use • permit to develop a six resident, six bedroom group home for the developmentally disabled on the subject site. The portion of the site planned for development is presently vacant; there is an existing house on the remaining property which will be retained. The area surrounding the site is zoned for single family residences and is generally so developed. Churches and other community service facilities are also in place in the area. PROPONENT: Good Shepherd of Washington LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: The south side of N.E. 19th Street at the 3900 block, between Union Avenue and Shelton Avenue N.E. CONDITIONS: . 1. The applicant shall design and site the facility, including parking and ingress/egress routes, to be similar in style and placement on the lot to neighborhood residences. 2. The applicant shall work with the City to develop revised landscaping plans incorporating a greater number of plantings and larger shrubs and trees in order to enhance the property and to provide better separation between the site and neighboring properties, for the purpose of minimizing visual impacts, noise impacts and light and glare impacts from this development. 3. The applicant shall work with the City to develop a plan for approved hours of operation, erosion control, drainage management, and cleaning of construction equipment while the home is being constructed, in order to protect the integrity of the development site and the adjoining neighborhood. 4. That the applicant provide the City with a $1,000.00 revolving cash bond to ensure that the roadway is kept clean of dirt and debris. NOTE TO APPLICANT: A. The applicant needs to have a 20 foot wide driveway. B. Additionally, it is suggested that this facility be designed to incorporate additional amenities for the residents (e.g. a patio or deck with southern exposure, a greater variety of plantings to supplement the planned lawn area). C. That the applicant meet all requirements set by the Uniform Building Code for the construction of the group home facility. • 'Nu XIGN3ddV EXHIBIT 8 , GSW-Ou4 Page 1 of , C;& oFFti-NTOj. • r, I� f; n W1 F • GOOD SHEPHERD GROUP HOME 1 • FFR 9,, 41988 DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT L3UI_..I,muiZONING r fPT Good Shepherd of Washington, a non-profit corporation of -the State of Washington, formed by parents/guardians of mentally retarded developmentally disabled young adults , is planning to build: a Group Home (wood frame construction), for six developmentally disabled adults on a site on the south side of N. E. 19th Street', between Union and Shelton Avenues NE (Sierra Terrace Div. No . 1 , Vol . 76-53/54 Parcel No . 2, (36 , 200 square feet) . The Group Home we are planning is 2528 square foot rambler with 6 bedrooms , kitchen, dining room, living room, laundry room; two and, one half baths , and a small office for the staff . The facilities will be wheel chair accessible with 36 inch doors and hand rails in bathrooms . The' hallways will have exit doors so that in case of fire there are alternate exits . In addition, the bedrooms will be separated from the living/dining area with automatic fire door . The facilities will be staffed 24 hours a day, seven days a week. The residents will be mentally retarded/developmentally disabled and will need help in their every day activities , such as dressing, eating and bathing. In addition, the staff will develop special training program , in order to train the residents to live as indepen dently as possible. The following, criteria will be used in the selection of residents : a. The entry age will be 21 minimum and 40 maximum. There will be no maximum age for residents . b. Mentally retarded that require 24 hour a day supervision.. c . May have limited communication skills . d. No chronic medical problems requiring nursing care. Residents will be able to participate in training programs for self med- ication. e. May use prosthetic device for ambulation, i .e. , wheelchair or walker, or have abnormal gait that require special service. f. May need assistance with eating, dressing, bathing and toilet- ing but will be in training programs (in home) to become more independent in those areas . g. Residents will reflect homogeneity of learning needs and developmental functions . h. Priority will be given •to South King County/Renton residents currently living in the community. , i . Either sex, both sexes will reside in the home. APPENDIX "B" REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : /c o ilia ,, n APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDIT ONS flSOT APPROVED UTILITY APPROVAL SUBJECT TO 1 _�..._. � LATE COMERS AGREEMENT-1iJATEit -r LATE COMERS AGREEMENT-SEVIER 1 1 SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE-WATER !/1e6 ,�d, , X 3/6 c D D Lf y '/,4�d p p -SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE-SEWERy 0�9 U� ' 4 l¢4° SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AREA CIh RGE-WATER NQ 41 z zr0 o0 gri Belt• SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AREA CHARGE-SEWER .D ' i WO. - • • (,A)or SF r / APPROVED WATER PLAN A�oJ — IJ-. $3`, 0 iC J ' APPROVED SEWER PLAN T << 5 -41 Z, uv APPROVED FIRE HYDRANT LOCATIONS BY FIRE DEPT. _ . ,,'; FIR E FLf e!AIIALY AR ' ,0:.,,, 3./ /10 .',;•t,;.,:':;'' • DATE: /�F 7S ,SIGNATURE OF ECTOF ? AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE 11? REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : VI APPROVED n APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS n NOT APPROVED • • • DATE ' -- / r8"• SIGNATUR OF IRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED -iEPRESENTATIVE 3 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : Ti APPROVED n APPROVED WITH COND1 IONS NOT APPROVED 0 0/,_.,. .....„____ (.....„,..v.,:wv_e.i...x..._ ______ __e_l. . , , ,......c.,A.,_ e7) 3;?e„v„_ de,4,-- er,,.._ i"--;C,__... ,.eL<..e.-----t..,__ e_e,,,d, .. cEZi4" -- 6-1-3- X._ .3//�/9g . ; • -,;; ::. I li, t.. I;, DATE ' • SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE :; ,• * f•1,.1.. • , 1 hi: i .. • REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : NOT APPROVED APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS El f-coL m GL 0 .Y • 6 c6Lr,� SIGNATURE 0 f(ECTOR OR AUTH' - rZED REPRESENTATIVE _ REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : (701)31036 1)IUI5IUN ' n APPROVED ` APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS n NOT APPROVED R ZSit .kcT\ COL I'Dcrv'1 TRPT 1 F rI Goo st- I-eit &RGOlio lAurne 1 s_ Dis6cN i I I')tXD, YID -I.+ Z.00106 O ) -- P {oblz-T ( 5 'r-fil" RthcCK TO 'II% GR,I61rOct, �Z�I c A1J AJ '(Z�f.GYhelft \ II<PPRO // o T1 is COMO:1 )At, (;P% MZmI( TTO ptuf s o Lu t) 4 --r tztes pt,N\s-n iv(as seen^ pt✓2;Iz-G 0„ 'tR-CComw`etuo (--N z P t )T' sI t' Kr t NY'(I U PUJr(r)& 4i o r► I OR_E . . , 9iU DATE: 3"63 :" "`11 OR J 'I_ED REPRESENTATIVE -•- STr DI � TOF AUTHOR REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : APPROVED 0 F-1 APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS F-1 NOT. APPROVED.t-ILAD C.„8/1/1,k,1,-/‘,0-A34--- • /1. A I ,�� L7A/ OI /IA,/:" DATE' ' r- .l c" SIGNATURE IRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION ; ?",e/'1=F/C' 5N6g- S n APPROVED El APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS PlicT APPROVED /D . :.Dlvid P Sew / h p f p. C�j1� l �' GS�-/ems ci al....c-A5 •/" D h C�C�LG � /�^ I�^P 07-e.QC(J Y�nl S / < �'J�'}-. c - -1-L- �[l�- 1^J J f oZ-J �Y"p��+)/ 5 i-ve e 7 - 71-/ te.r 4. Cl�/� ��Q / h cD1, 14.) 7`s 71.. /L' c.. ? -.�.7- 24"�: .p:s� � b y e r I/ e a c /. Cvh v -7v V 7S 74-4, C/a8Y he i 3-t a,f y 'S DATE: /7) ./ ) SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR. OR AUTHOR ZET '?EPRESENTATIVE REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : fiR. 13WI'_AL.L n APPROVED nV APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS n NOT APPROVED Any development and/or construction shall comply with current Fire and Building Codes and Ordi- nances. • Firepartment access toads/lanes, shall be paved minimum width 20'; minimum height 13' 6". Yes No Preliminary firc.. ..' calcu,,e'ogs show a fire flow of _ is required. hydrants with a minimum flow of /abo gpm each is required. F'+imary hydrant is required to be within 'S o feet 'of the structure. Secondary hydrants are required to be within 3aa feet of the 'structure. An approved automatic sprinkler system is required to protect the total structure. Yes No,..✓ All fire department access roads are to be paved and installed prior to construction. Yes, ..... No All fire hydrants are required to be installed and approved rior to construction./Yes No MATE : "� SIGN TURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE azee.") /di 9/'d REVISION b/1982 Fnrm 182 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : Parks and Recreation Department nAPPROVED n APPROVED WITH, CONDITIONS n NOT APPROVED The group home has been designed to reflect the residential character of the neighborhood. Landscaping is abundant and has been used as a buffer where appropriate, i.e. ; to buffer the streetscape from the staff parking area. • .hi';ar;: t mot,-S ��� • DATE; .` i:,b , � ;SIGNATU F DI ECTOR 0� ITHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE • ;�+:' .. • ,.i: . ' �t 4 t S i u•, fl". I• ci' i l�'i� ' '',i • • 'is • • •• • :.III: :r 4. 47� • • •'ti rl• • ili • , r•..S' 1i'^i+' t�' t. 1�; rri �,Y: .5 i •i?1' .) :'lam • .t2!' .Y: is •.1'. :N., �' ti • • • • LS'• l+ rt {{ ' . 'i Y-Ni I. 4::f , r;.asa '•` 4YV' • • i y • Rdi ,, , .:. ..r.. .. .. ..jl•'• ::i` ?C . � yY1`"' : " :: �- :,: %.ii: . REQUIRCD C FLOW CALCULATIONS �' 1.. • ;.:" 1. HAZARD IDE4TIFICATION INFORMATION NAME /'� 4 s.6i -�,0 o� /�JAs�i�61-d�1 U.B.C. CLASS OF BUILD ADDRESS 9ov 8,,� N' E /9 _,4, S . /•_ FIRE MGMT AREA ' 2. DETERMINE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION - CLASS (CIRCLE ONE): I - it IV . FIRE-RESISTIVE NON-COmBuSTIBLE III V ORDINARY (NOTE: IF "MIXED", SEES PECIALLINSTRUCTION OR AR W 3. DETERMINE AREA; EA AND BASIC FIRE FLOW)MIxED GROUND FLOOR AREA: S'[ , FT2 (A) NUMBER OF STORIES: TOTAL BUILDING AREA: ..? 4. DETERMINE BASIC FIRE FLOW FROM TABLE AR AREA 5. .DETERMINE OCCUPANCY FACTOR ADJUSTMENT: ADJUSTMENTA).. _ . / GPM (C) IF. LOW HAZARD, SUBTRACT UP TO 25% OF (B): ' IF HIGH HAZARD, ADD UP TO GPM (C) 6. COMPUTE SUB-TOTAL (B+C): 25� OF (B) (IF E+C IS LESS THAN 500 GPM, INSERT 500 GPM) 7. DETERMINE SPRINKLER ADJUSTMENT: 7, y GSM (D) CIF COMPLETELY SPRINKLERED, SUBTRACT UP TO 50$UpFp IFSTMENT: `�_ GPM CE) AND FIRE RESISTIVE OR NON-COMBUSTIBLE CONSTRUCTION, SUBTRAC LIGHTP TO HAZARD OFU(D CY 8. DETERMINE EXPOSURE ADJUSTMENT: C ). USING THE TABLE AT LEFT AS A GUIDE ENTER THE "FOUR FACES" OF THE BUILDING IN A THE SEPARATIONAND ADJUSTMENT FOR EACH OF THE TABLE AT THE RIGHT: SEPARATION ' MA) . ADJUSTMENT EXPOSURE SEPARATION ACT. ADJ. 0 -.10 25% MAX. 11 - 30 20% MAX. NORTH 3 11 - 6030 • 210% MAX. EAST _ TD ADD /Q"_% 61 -100 SOUTH .• 70 ADD /�_$ 1016 -1500 10% MAX. WEST • ` y/z2 5% MAX. TOTAL % OF ADJUSTMENT ADD 5� 150 OR 4-HR WALL 0% MAX. (NOT TO EXCEED 75%) % (TOTAL $ ADJUSTMENT TIMES (p) b ADJ/Yo �2/1 175^ GPM (F) • 9. DETERMINE ROOF AND SIDING COVERING ADJUSTMENT: (Zr SHINGLE COVERING, ADD 500 GPM) ADJUSTMENT: _ ._..._ GPM CG) 0. COMPUTE ESTIMATED FIRE FLOW REQUIRED: (IF D+E+F+G IS LESS THAN 500 GPM, INSERT 500'GPM)CIF D+E+F+G IS GREATER THAN 12,000 GPM, INSERT 12,000 GPM) / E 39,j • • • (D+E+F+G) REQUIRED FIRE FLOW: • 711' �L. 4560U ' GPM CH) • SIGNED' - ' ' �� t , • ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLI ,T REVIEW SHEET EFC-010-88; REZONE: R-010-88, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT: • GOOD SHEPHERD U HOME CU-010-88 • March 1988 ,kj,? ;..i:,;.,'•,.:i.;i: , ".r:; :.,,Fs';`: , f•, ,:fe+liY'II. ,SL l..,• S�!: : 'i ,'A.jg•,, •t i ti'a;�;�`. ,,• :iy��• ',,` . . .,., Page Two .s, `:N.4 fit �4ttipid�ipll�' l ;1�.,> s�;.,,,;i1 1,• }:. .so-• t:'^ • • The concepts of normalization and habilitation were •supported by state and federal legislation passed in the 1970s. •The 1975 Developmentally Disability Assistance and Bill of Rights Act pro- vide for protection and advocacy of human and ,legal rights and • the promotion of deinstitutionalization and normalization through community placement.) • ' As a result of these efforts, "Community residential facilities 'for people with develop- mental disabilities in the United States grew from 611 in '1972-1974 to 6,414 in 1982. 2 However, "Existing housing programs for people with developmental disa- bilities have' limited space, due to limited funding; and public housing authorities maintain long waiting lists." 3 Additionally, "Although the array of housing for the developmentally disabled has increased in the past few years, many individuals continue to be housed in inappropriate settings..... A 1986survey of DDD case managers concerning residential needs illustrates the problem. Case managers ' identified 292 individuals needing more appropriate settings. An additional 612 individuals who are King County residents need subsidized housing or are in state institutions and targeted to return home." 4 • The proposed Good Shepherd Group Home on N. E. 19th Street will be a step in the • right direction toward addressing the housing needs of the developmentally dis- advantaged. Also, the neighborhood will be improved with a widened road, curbs gutters and sidewalks from the site to Union Avenue N. E. • Finally, enclosed for your consideration are; 1) Bellevue's group home zoning code, and 2) summaries of value input studies completed over the last ten years. The most common method used by the researchers was to track home sales in the immediate vicinity of the special residences and compare those sales to sales in a similar control neighborhood. Attachments Footnotes: BRIDGING THE HOUSING GAP, King County, December 1987 1 , Page 19 2, Page 19 3, page 21 • 4, page 24 • • t :- yr fir" = x-, y- ,- ZONING CODE PROVISIONS FOR SPECIAL POPULATION HOUSING IN KING COUNTY `z <zFA NUMBER OF •I .Is ', - TYPE OF RESIDENTIAL FACILITY RESIDENTS WHERE ALLOWED APPROVAL PROCESS . =:-. €�a%—-� - ALLOWED- JURISDICTION -`' REFRFSICE - - - - r •-��- -- � -^ - Conditional Use ' V: - ,Algona,;';',-.---....::.:.: 5.040 "Custodial care facilities: 1) physically disabled, No limit ' All zones Permit (CUP) or _ w I __ .A-.-; .- aged, mentally confused or disturbed persons, or (up to 5 Planned Unit �r-=. .� -•=: _ persons who suffer from a mental deficiency which unrelated F_ T Y:;:: -=..._ Development (PUD) r; _ .. - . ��;__�]:...-.-..:. - renders them incapable of assuming those respon- individuals , __ sibilities expected of the socially adequate perdwelling) 1 ;- - ' ' individual, who require supervision, personal ^ , �„ and/or health care." • _�?--;;�:�.-�Auburn .• 18.04.060 "Boarding House" (3 or more boarders), "nursing No limit R-2 (single family, CUP M1r_---"�_ 6,000 sq. ft. lot) :.___ ,;: - and .430 home, rest home, convalescent home, guest home and all higher __: -..�.::. and home for the aged". "Foster care home" * >. J� density zones ���;.- _ `._ '- _ •- (not defined). � =-__.Lf= levue r .50.02bands' � "1:.Group-Care_ _Homes, Class-I.-'State-licensed - See col. 3 Class 1-A permitted Permitted outright � ; - =cal•++T`—. "" .022, 20.10.440 1•-%''S •"foster•homes-for'children•(not including:nursing in all single-family __ ' — homes),':homes for handicapped and physically (up to 6 zones subject to ,,f-disabled,.and homes for those with developmental unrelated 1,000-fool dispersal • - . disabilities. Group-Care Homes, Class I, are individuals -%sub-classified as follows: .. per dwelling) Class I-B permitted Permitted outright '' _ �A. Group-Care Homes, Class 1-A - a maximum of in all multi-family `8 residents & 2 resident staff; zones, subject to - B. Group-Care Homes, Class 1-B - a maximum of 1,000-loot dispersal •S• 12 residents & 2 resident staff; C. Group-Care Homes, Class I-C - a maximum of Class I-C and CUP j: 20 residents & 4 resident staff. Class II-B and C • group homes permitted • 2. Group Care Homes, Class II: State-licensed in multi-family zones ' group-care homes for juvenile delinquents, hallway houses providing residence in lieu of II-A permitted Permitted outright institutional sentencing, halfway house providing Class all residentialAprm in multifamily residence to those needing correctional and mentalzones; CUP in :, institutions, and residential rehabilitation zones ` centers for alcohol and drug abusers. Group-Care single family zones Homes, Class II, are sub-classified as follows: A. Group-Care Homes, Class II-A - a maximum of 6 residents & 2 resident staff; _ B. Group-Care Homes, Class II-B - a maximum of :iF _ 10 residents & 2 resident staff; and C. Group-Care homes, Class II-C - a maximum of 20 residents & 4 resident staff. • - " - SUMMARY OF PROPERTY VALUE IMPACT STUDIES , ▪-,ar -_- - -.'• ., DATE OF SIZE OF AREA ▪ -- `.-._ NUMBER ' ?'� <='=' STUDY/LOCATION OF HONES VARIABLES STUDIED FROM TIME • - -_=a::` STUDIED GROUP HOME PERIOD STUDIED CONCLUSIONS : '.•..• AUTHOR(S) POPULATION GROUP STUDIED = -c- -sales price 400 - 4 yrs: 2 yrs before No evidence of decline in '::a_„ - Micha• Boeck l :Dearhn � - mentally ill 1980/Toronto/ 5 ��''"'�=��- - �Michael Dear & ', mentally ill -sales activity meters group home estab- sales price in group home --,.,.._:=' - S'Martin Taylor fished, 2 yrs after neighborhood; sales activity equal to that in - z :: <•:=: control neighborhood. _'= Breslow, Stuart 1976/White Plains, 16 -sales price - 12 yrs: 6 yrs before Inconclusive; no decrease - =:"'"_ NY/DD, mentally -sales activity home established, 2 in property value (some _--:.,r.•_t:_ yrs after increases); increased turn- --: -__ ':�s�. -_:_ -:...- .-. ill, veterans, depen- sue.;:; _ �, s:r: _-- dent & neglected over. __- V , . r. - children & the elderly • _... City of Lansing 1976/Lansing, 5 neighborhoods -sates price - - Property value equal to orhigher than control neigh- :' _ MI/mentally retarded, containing group -assessed value ?- adult ex-offenders, homes -sales activity boyhood; no increase in _ youth offenders, reco- sales activity vering alcoholics Dear, Michael 1977/Philadelphia, PA/ 12 -sales price 6 blocks 4 yrs: 2 yrs before, No decrease in value; turn- . - • mentally ill -sales activity 2 yrs after over rates inconclusive Developmental 1982/Minnesota/men- 14 -sales price 1 block 2 yrs No decrease in value; no Disabilities - tally retarded -assessed value increase in turnover Program -sales activity Dolan, Lawrence 1982 (update of 1978 32 -sales price - 5 yrs after group No decrease In value; no & Julian Wolpert study)/New York State/ -distance from home establishment increased turnover; no dif- mentally retarded group home ference in transactions/ . . -sales activity value closer to group home Dolan, Lawrence 1978/New York State/ 42 -sales price - 1 yr after estab- No decrease in value; & Julian Wolpert mentally retarded -sales turnover lishment of group distance from group home -distance from home not significant; no ` group home increase in sales activity K:SP-B.1 >1= -> : _ DATE OF NUMBER� SIZE OF AREA • == - = STUDY/LOCATION OF HOMES VARIABLES STUDIED FROM - TIME ._> 4 AUTHOR POPULATION GROUP STUDIED STUDIED GROUP HOME..1-• PERIOD STUDIED c:J-Fora= CONCLUSIONS Ts` =Goodale, Tom 1979/Ottawa/develop- 38 -sales price 1 block 2 yrs: 1 yr before Homes nearest to group ,�,.-,-1:<;_._ g p home _• `:;- ; : mentally disabled -sales activity establishment, 1_ � ���_ „�: yr experienced increased value f u� _ -r f t.r_. , - -assessed value after 62% of lime; 38% of time --:1 = , _ "`=;_•= -number of days e • ••= reverse was true; no increase = _t:_�=" -. - • • property listed in turnover, lime on market _ - -selling price vs.. data inconclusive _� `_..• ; asking price • -distance from _ - ` :_k: ;. group home v im . ~`Lauberg Daniel 1986/Chicago & other 14 -mean sales price 5 block 4 yrs. No decrease in property ;rural • I and urban_ ��:'• an areas -sales activity ra i- radius value; no increased sales , ;y -_ ::_ in Illinois/develop- activity - ;' = mentally disabled • • l Landauer, Martin 1980/medium-sized 7 -sales price 4 yrs: 2 yrs before Higher sales activity just - northeastern city and -sales activity establishment, 2yrs group - - prior to opening of ``- three adjoining towns/ - after home; however, decrease In mentally retarded. - ' property value not exper- ienced; 5 neighborhoods showed increased value i _ Mambort, Terence 1981/Montgomery 7 -sales activity - - _ - 4 yrs: 2 yrs before, In neighborhoods which were i County, OH/mentally -sales price vs. establishment, 2 yrs very vocal in opposition to : • retarded asking price after establishment of group home, homes sold lower than . market price for up to 1 yr; after home established, then returned to normal; neighborhoods not opposed experienced no decrease in property value or increased . sales Ryan, Carey & 1985/Eastern Nebraska/ 13 --sales activity 1200 feet 4 yrs: 1 yr before, No increase in turnover; no Ann Coyne mentally retarded -sales price vs. 3 yrs after increase in time house on asking price market; list & sales prices -distance from increased group home -time house on - market St. Paul, Minn. 1981/Twin Cities & 14 -sales price 1 block 2 yrs: 2 yr before, No decrease in value; no other towns in -sales activity 2 yrs after increase in turnover Minnesota -assessed value - K:SP-B.2 -_~ r-`� SIZE OF ARFJ1 - z- M- DATE OF NUNBER _' -.7 ----- OF BONES VARIABLES STUDIED FROM CONCLUSIONS _ .-- - y >,.; STUDATIONAGION STUDIED GROUP HONE PERIOD STUDIED ::.� POPULATION GROUP STUDIED =:: AUTHORS) . ` f` egli-, -<: _ 3 yrs: 18 months No decrease in value; no w r.., .. sales price increasede turnover; days on =: Suffolk Community 1984/Suffolk County, 7 -sales activity before, 18 months •-=,-Y, NY/psychiatric & devet- market did not increase ` Council -distance from after ; x _- : opmentally disabled group home s .r.:= -number of days :3. _ _ M., - on market = w: y r.-_- _ , -assessed value C=...4....t,�^ -Cam... - .. --. - - No decrease in value (one -,r- "` -time on market ` Wagner, Christopher 1980 (update of 1979 .. 8 neighborhood increased); no - �-.; t. -- -sales price vs. � 44--- Kristine Mitchell (Codymbus)kfiOnH/Cdevet asking price increase in lime on market�,.. (Columbus), 1''11` opmentally disabled •-:~.<, - = adults, mentally ill .. .Y - - adults, neglected, . dependent, or unruly -,_ male adolescents • _ _ ` __ -time on market - 1 yr. 6 mos before, No decrease In value; no - `Wagner, Christopher 1979/Franklin County 8 -sates price vs. 6 mos after (6 increase in lime on market ',.:&.:Christine Mitchell (Columbus), OH/devel- asking price homes used date of -' opmentally disabled purchase of group _~ = adults, mentally ill home as midpoint, adults, neglected. 2 used date of dependent, or unruly occupancy) male adolescents -sales price 1 block 3 mos - No decrease in value (2 • Wiener, Dirk, 1982/two Iowa Communi- 8 neighborhoods experienced Ronald Anderson ties/developmentally increases) & John Nietupski disabled • l �+ census - For residential facilities, Wolch, Jennifer 1983/Oakland, CA/ 79 census tracts -sales price tract decrease In value was 5 & Stuart Gabriel dependent containingm group observed only In populationsneighbor- homes and human hoods with a greater than service facilities 50% non-white population s K:SP-B.3 • I 0 ` ' J • APPENDIX "C" i, •• .. .. it.....,,0 l ,,j,•:: 'ii..i.4,*a' aue'''' ,;‘;-&.,••, .0 P.4itak.:;.:,': .,. ' ' '''' . li ''''';'..'''''''..".;"'' '''''''''''' ••'''.:' ''''•'.... '.;t'''* •' 7 t.1')....'!•'''''il.•••'' 1.,;;'.4S1'14:Va.t.A:',:i sc„.1.1.44iti• ,a“..1% t.. ....., . Evotz,a,,,AN.,,, ,,..t .- „....,......,.4...,.• . .... • ',...t..,,,.,::::,si:•,.....:•.t, ' • . .‹. ' ,.,. lit.,ti,.. ,..:11./...5,..Y‘,4.1.111P. t,.V.V . . ' op.,•• . 41' 410 gv• ‘''0 • tit*C.j'• • ' 4v• t,„•3••,,%.t,,Q,,,, ;•......,,..0•••:.•••.1..h.• ,,t,• ', 4,0,..,...icm.,,,. , . r.„-,..;.......,0*...to::: ::.. i'.,,,,,-....;:lit‘l . . ../.::4 ,,, 1:04.(44,1;,;;54•,J...i..0.N.J,...,....,;:‘,*...,.,h:,.,...-•• ,•,... •v .., .AL••Z v''.• . .40f•-•., • •• i'0,1'!if•.qA.4•?,X. .•;•1W.'410;;V:A•Vii°/..i,'•}i 4.1X•. •'.'40:441'''';';'.% '46Stt;00•.'1' . ri. . WO.•••••r•i V44:11.0. ''' 'VA''2:1• '.'us'i•V:ii .•:...::;,,.••''.;•.. .,.,,f-vo,r4-y1 p „ ,i, 4, , ., ,,.1 4.,,,v,t•or,'N4 47.•<•.,Nt••••41•••••LoVcx.,.•444.',.••4•••,..,•44,s.i:"*„,•,,!..i. e _01 ' • i''.4•PettRit• r' V.4, gee5 '..:,.:411.Nkukommt.40,5., ;,;..,. .riook,,..4.1 „ k.....:-... ' ...kwo....",ai:.... .,,p-,..A......:- -!'-•:- ...4,..',4- V 31,4-',':,t4.0.: i.4 . • A s, •104,4•10k ' ,. 0.+:).`•:',';.,0:74ks• •..:•:,Woc4t.',1:',i'i.to"oit*r•Zi••;:t Of,:a"Afoll'il'.41,''.-1.'..,..4i?i•vg,,v,...:4,•,:.. • • E-..,,,• ,„:,:.,,,„..;,./,,,,,,,,...,,,-!••-•. i......,,,.,,,. ,,.... .,.„,..,,,,,ti .....„,.....:•„„,,,„,, -, . .,,,,,,A...g.,.,,.,,,,,4.4.0,. , .,.ex....A....V.:Y.-,:).',,,,,•:..;.?,•?.4......4.h.,,:v....,..:.: :,,,•••,-•a..,,,,A.-.4,,. 4.,,, • •:•••••• .'"„.•••.•;,.•.`• . '- ,,6‘,....A.Net..,,,... ;•••,,.•••:•,0,-...r,ii.44:,...0.7 ..,-:., ••4,.,...,:,,l'i ,., .. 7•••••9-04,•&-?„. ' . -''''' ••••••.:::,',•`•'••••• .. ':'.'. ....-; .•,.,`I'..7\g':'',0,5_,i.,'....,!‘sor,"t`t , '',; ,.1i'•-..-,'•e;.-,',,41111,• °4'.2:•','.:,';•,''.r."''. ...•*„.,': : •••:„,..• ''..?..''`'•'.:-,t5,-.14.1; ' •.,.'7tP,:!',.4 •,'''',4‘.1?::,..;; ".`:':&:'•.: -`10'.-.-'.0. ', -••'•',. :••,..;.'•••••,:`.4'.47,;:',.'.'0.•::;;•.'s?, ••!:•",• ';,..•,.'- '.• 1,..., '-'.• '•• ,,•• ,,0,-,:y .,,s.:,4":)...• :At': ..,''.,0•• •::'4";.:•'• '...,,er.$1,:.•;,..' '•:',...:.;" .44'k....'" ...•,•,.. • Pill„k., .0.•so.54•%••4, "':.: ••:•'•if.;••i':•:.;?,.....''F.q,,':'.:••"..,... .?•••::11;;;Wo.:.•::::- '," ••:•‘%:ki.;*.''..A:'.......'4'4C'.."..AW,..%,:•••,....:,4„:".•..,-.•0:• ..,,A•o''.,.... ,... .1.),•;,,,,y....,wr:•., , ,.•...y.Vv...,,,,,..00,,,,...:.:•,,-.o..e.•:?4•A•o.vrio,•:;,t,.. - •••::•,,,,,44,,%.c.:0,..,,,,.••••••,:t.ft:.vvy.,...04e,:,,,,o-lo,..•,.•••• A.:. • - '••4:'41):,W.,,so ,: ..•:(,,,'•••••:of.4405.e4o ...--oekVA...‘ ••••1?` 4' ..,t.. • li0,... • '" ,iA.',•%14-11..,..6 tl.•.p.snl.f.. to.:ii.,1..._:* ;.7i,.ymk',',;:i:.:.'.,• ' W:,.'Z'O.A..;';'.04.511.'..l..ti,.'4,..ki...P.V 1%'k$:' 1,1/44f- ,4,re.".„,. 4,..,,,..c,..A.,,,A .li•l•.. ..,•,..!.•1.1.,., • te••••0•••:•• . •"•••••s••:•'C'i'.4•4•;:.••• ••1,•';••••••WW.,•:•••••,.•;•3":",t-:%.21,4•:•••'••••••,P 0;:p:•••SA • •••••i,M,..'4•1•0',.,..,08,•,•, : . ,...•.::K.•. :,Z•.'N.1:•,•km..M•NA.,•••••••:;..,,,,•.%•:;;;•,..11,40.f......,i. .:,..., .1,-4,1,VAX•1,,,:,:t. . ..4,..1,sp..4,Z,V,V.• `• 'IN,; ....21.:::';';.:*1:.;...i;r:•.::"111..4.::::,-.....;P4....i.:•,,'41",i,!gigi'i,; ,:,klAfill;.:i.:.'.:'Tilt i1,1,.-0.4111'i'.::.113;3 iIre':!:444,..V..0.r.A 't"t'44it'.4.:,,V;it%I...3,,,..t.. . :!Z.,...4,..4.:),,i„..v.:.! .•' ....Yt,O.:,*:.0:;,4,1..3`.i,..i•••,.44PP5.1...,K, , .t.t.";.RfLYS•ttX*„. ...1•64'.' ,1,;:r. ,4,-rth.:.,4„..' .-•• , ':•,:r..i•l:',1.7",••••-•:„:.i..-...,*,:,V• .:•'N:g,•;.{...::•••:',2i:•:•••.•:•.••...,'":'.` ,",,::••••,,,•.•, ,,,x)•:.',••,,n,',,,,•`.1,,....e.•.":2'''''••••'"•'-•'-:-"s,',.•.i4k', •:•:'. • ,.1.,-.,'•k;s C'-2lk41.7i4•.;N;,.1W•,34.0„,v,.,,r,a.4 -..•zw *;,..-1.41FX:10.,:V:•',%:.K..,,...ei.,.,....P4,.,...,,2,i..,.:,:"',y...,,4.•i7.•,,,..e..,...;••:.':.,;,.;,...6•.:..1•0...',:e,d..1::•,•P,-,,;;,si;;,‘.•5••V'A.....A.,....:'.'..', '•:••.'/,':,.,.i't•.•.•.d...;:c•:•• ''•'.•.r4- •/ ' ;,.0 A'., • ..qifAi'...1,;'..C6/.1r:AlifAlf ' r '''744:''ail'zi%4„ .'t'4 trYte'IPzAl'',S.,i.'e.,i,,;,,1-:,i,;;;;.''4''‘'':,,i;"r,,... ,:..,, :,..' .• . '4'.'.1;...,..::......;:.',.,.,4 e" 'YAP:11'V..;. :.•:•••?:..4, ii; ',,,','"."..44‘.2.1t'i• ....-•-•;•."':.-..`''"'1 • . ,.....,„,,,•,••..,..,!,.:s..,, ,.,4••••;',11,,•co••4.4.40. .., '...".o.'.i•,''••••••-•.-4.0,....'7 ," , ...4."....!.......:1 ;':43:..,:t .:..„11:,;1..V...4',;',MN li,'..,T,I..,'.1.0.,•AkV.:4•13.'•V,. ..... .;:.)::.A..:31.,,t104...,f;.i..'1,71.Z.';,...0.ffgel.,A;•:tvVit ''..,,,,it.'X.,d,;.:,:g.j..,...,;:..,,' ^ . , .„ ,444., •. ....,..., :,.,,..,,,•:,,,,, ,...:,...,,,.,..,.. ,,,t,f.i.•:4,,•-••., ,..„.....A.,..::-..,:i.,.,,,:„.,.;.,,,,,1 . ,,.,.....„..„:„,„,4,,.....: ...„,„,,,,,,,,„..,•••4:„. .•• ..,,,,,.4,...,,, .$4,7-' ' • „.,..,.. .,,,,,,,.....,,....,.....,,pi. ,:.....,,,,..?...,u,......1, ........,.,,,,,,.o.„,,,:,,.1,,,z,..e.,........,p5;:,...:••..,:.:•,...:,,z:.,T:,..,'1;A.,',..:.'. t.:. VA .' • • .1 1 r- ' k... .,..te . .;,,,,,,. \:,:.:*.; .,.......,:. ..u:.:::::.:0,-co.:lir,.0:....:•::$,',.::.,m.K.?kr.:....,:. , ..,, -,,,•,.....v..,,,,,.......1...„.. ,,,,, .k....: ....,,,,,,x. -.• .1...„.., I t - ' .. .- ....,,,r,,,,,v,••:;74,-.: ,•::.:p.,r,.., '2.,.,i; kri, ,.:. ., . ,. .. - • .,-.:-.1.• • '.,-: - r.":'.' ''''''''').'"NATV .ttelV '''''. ...4.;•:,i''01';'11;*., istN•., 1 iCn. hiri:'..11,f t' :',7.' '.1,{ Tfe.Mji..;',;'fi..,,•'• •Il . . • , k....1....,....1.; ,..4:30....i .NelY:.4.5.*M.; ::.4'::: •.• -4,.,.,^4'' 't.", ..'!;•,:.'.,.N.:•,- :•:01.. .,LI 7.4',1. i ..i'..4...;',,,,?:;:. tit t1/4..,...,:4:....:reat•i,i;f4,...,,,2.-1.,',44`4.10,i4N::. .'i..• .1,X.,., •• 't,-•;;;O:1•M..r.1:::;,t.gtrf,..rAiit!',71;'.V.:1.t.t..1.•.,V...,,W..i;: •.,.•.,i ..1......00 i:,z".0.•••••03.4.g.•••:8'.•k:,,Al, •,''0.4*.,•PMV• -1.• v•;.94' , . . LJ • . •- .,,... \ •••4,41 .....,-,, ,..,•?,...1",:•.? ,1.43-...N .,.W.t.;.,;,:.;•1:7',Nf,4,:M.1...,5,...,.1..,,,,q,.. ..,,, ,,,,,,, . /-:.i•••F3*.-44'...,t.'4n.,,,W.:.,i4V. 4.1.4.V.V.4.5.0tIggii ''- '...,1,•'',.., • 0 . . ...• . . • . .. ... 1..J.i31',1,: • 4.•:'geD s4:S,..'11'`'.:M.17.?....7.:2.i4:,'''' .•'''.‘i' •.•hir,',:':A.;',..j..,t''''. '!;. '.'At,A.'''..,'*A.W., t''t4,W.t.t.',0,4.114i1•010 .;. WV • in'Zi.i.t li,;,*$.tig!.. Z...,•tn,rtAS.•,,,•,,,NW,..rit:..stk.........,,t„•. .....„ . • 'lei,•,4;..?,•,..A.4..,, .,ix„...rt,ri•..;I:gi,;';',91e;:,i,t4','-',N,..,:;-,..,.,;'f:•,,•.',.;.... ,_.... .. .. . , .. ' . 4,•;'...r..V.Za4.‘ 441 ,,,,,,,,?4....,..•:....:,..,•-•"..t",..6,,,,,.,::"TY: ..::..". ..4,..•••;,',,%,.... • 7A4'..e0,!...,',4.•;.44?•4';'...4i.•".''''.'... .."'''''''' ••:1 -','. , . . • . ,i)4.494:"V•1: i '...;;;;.e.•.‘41,11•Sp'''',••0,. .:..4.:.•..;-' .,..: ::::,.]:...•,.....'kl,?.'.:s:•.:.,:.*:'.•,..9.....,.. 'r'', ' ;4•.1-'7.....••:•40.ip...,".t.'..c...,;•;:.,':',.."'",„.4.40‘,,,, ". , ' . . , „,,,,...,,,,......„,#,,,,,,,t.,, . ,$:g.} ... •:::•2.N5•M:T.O.:.•:. , Tt' •••••',: Z;•'••••1•N:• ::'1,4 ".1•': t' .,;?..,..1.,..;•.:4F,..?1.1,•;•••‘..,•".',,,,i:•:•4V•44•••:, • • ' t ...•••:••• ..,1••••••••0•461,4)•T•fqn 6.. •• • '''' ,'.•.ViteAkts1-4•VG.144 ‘4*.il..iget ..'.;', .1.,.' '•'•9r,-,:.,.,.•,t;:%::.1/4"'. ..,.,....::....s.:.:.osaw.oir...;:,F..*:,:t.: ,a::;,:..:,• t .,,,,..,.,,....„.;a:4„,:„..;.,,,,„,..4, ,,.:„..........,::::........,..,e.„..,,,,i..,,s .•.. .... ‘,.i.,,i0.:.;:...,.4...i0.0,... .,......54 ,,.. ..,4:... .. ..... . ,,,..,...„:.,..,...,.,..,;,,,...,;.,..0.1.::,.t.„:„.i..„..0 . ... •,... . ‘3 • ' :P.l'.-.' 1'..:,•:.F.;" I.!' .41,i'•:i. .; :44.:.;.,:sveve:.,:- :,,%'.' 4.".t.',34,V,,,."' • .1e.,:,.......''''' . ....42$•?!':;4*::1:iql•',O.ZO.....0.%4Y4 . ..41...;•',."0• . ". , . '. .'' ..'.....i. ,r1s1 m• , .:::::. ?.;;Z...,:..,.:::....!;!..,.:,.....!.:::::::.;;1:!.!.::...;,::....k..:.!...!.:,:!..!..,::::::::.:;...:,;,':::.:.:::.;.;::..' ...,.... .., ., :..:::%Z.:7•V:..W.%•:' . ‘", .":AV::4,14,!,::*i•Vi.,i,,,,,' •,..v.11003.4.!f..4.,, . .zil',,,,M. . . ......„ ,. • . .5?.,:Wsi..,:+0. 1,7..1`.0.14.‘,.'.., '•"•::';':::.:44:-..,,..r..+1 ,....f.,...,.... i • . .. ',1,17,8'C';:;•ifle9.4`.1 f:T,..,,..:j:!...;• . .;, • ... .. "lq ••:e.5.4‘•-•••'.....4o•.••••ii!,-•..'''• .•••. 1:.•::••••• ....:4': :"''''-.otsg•qtt:: •-•'''•.2, ..-.4.1g*. • 40.„,„,,,:''''' • li . im4...,:.o.:.4M•..,,: -Ig$,Wi..,1,k:;:•', • . ,:g.'•.",:;•::::::•aliTc.: -•''.•• • ..,.,...,....w.G.,:tv...1,,,... .- ..•••••,,t4..,0)",...F.P•'s,i1g .,k".7.kr ' 4 1 .Z,.C.*:,.....,::',1::,,;.f.'.., '' X.* 2.,'., ...:.,•:3,:,:....,':. ',.:.:;',.. :•Al.,:',.V.'.i...,;;, le:+ I.1,4i'.01•::4}.:..t.V;''• .'..WV)Pr:,..V.,....• t&%,....),... , i.. • :..•.^.. .• ,•••• 1 ti...,14, .. , ...„ N.\,..,,,,' .. ''...\.;:•••‘..g.''..::< '". ,...."...P.i.4':'..,,: ::1.':\n . :..n,'AV;'.''W?S.',..it No• ''.'' ..,..,%......;;;.,1, I I1 Wi.N.,•,:,?,•:,,,, •• •,,..".:'6,....,,,,P.!,..6.0. :*•'.i.1.;,.:‘,,r • .I .4';',..V.•93:.. :'!'r,1, A:1•.;0.,1(:.. ,P.:j.S.,(::,KW:.4.0.'! $, .1!'k... .1.IF VN..1'.'*.1 ,...... • : 4...; ..,t;.....:ii 1.,.,,...0,;..,../. !....., ... ...... .. .*lyii,t. 4..ip i.. ;.. 's,'• ,tt,,,..A.... '10.t3t,r.:,...i.t4Ati;„...2.t ...4-j.:}tasy;,,,,..',,It .'At••,P••••,', ..T,3,14%..N. $. .%,,,,t. . V..•.I,'0,•''.,,,,,,"...V.SItt,e..,.<'. tl;., N'....Yii.:• .. •:. ....X.?!•.. 't< al 4.4:49,4,,,p:.;:s.:,S.,•5, ...„. , • ., . . .r...'P.':LP,.,:•::.•4•••41..... ••1:"'.7 - ,... ..1 „ . •,44.1a:X11.2.," '. ••••1•'''4.•••‘•• • ••'',•tt.•5'... ...:. 1:'•: •4:':4.'?'•1„.•• g • ' '.'446'04 . ,.4 0' ' 4.3 -3' • • •r.il:r.',•...;?:...".',17% .1•?-• • • if.,4,:.r: . ... . ..>-..:;.<A•....:,;),?.; ".:iii*.S.!..v7L(....1'....1;1:..i.:.5 ' ...;,,,-;:,..:::;.;.•,,,,,,,,,k`t. e!..,:, s':;••'-'....,,A..,• ... ...4.............. .....;.• 4..e.,•1,......',,t;s:Pn, F., ••,..4V•k;•:ss,.f':W:•,•,.-, % .fi.k-Pritn`l*R*. ' :04 !..et•'4.",:*-1(' IV.;•5••°%g+.• •‘,''''"Ri'.5z,...:el.t.,0-4.• 1....,.• Ct-, • : :ilkedrg . 4:1'-` • V .r. s. •. .1•: . ••• ••'4•:/`••';4-1.7' .:....-... A . ! -0,41.70 . • .• ,.•0?..*,:m ,...ii.".'1•RN'..I.A., .v.N'tli*.;?4,44'' ...'; r.,, :• :M.,-ii,l)'..:4;.1.:$;,••• 4 ,:, '0, • .0,4VAN.I.Gtx4.t.414141 1 .•-v•k:t4'•'••••A •:Vo.4,44V.• 'ilso.P.A.'!;--;.', • '. Ikv...s.,,Js,:?..,$......,... 1„,....-,....F. ,,,...7,,::.tei ...- . • . 0. .,m,....,gm,w• ,,,,x,,$, • e•••> ••:44.,••... .. , -„, j • • ... ... .. ... ' ' '442; I,';.,..6:4'4`.'::•:?,!.:'•:;,..": r.. ''''' .3•,.''VA,'. ev•O.r.,, ,i,.er...41. 1, ,ro••••%.-,!•'••• '':>,:',to:-'>'4';•' tf•'',,i ;MA-. Ar,z, '... .4,:: ,,,,,.. .„,,,,,,,,a.aLki•:. • e:.•-,. .:.•???,'''':•: •••%,''...z•-;•.` •'‘.••': •-..- . , -.,..c•Ortg-cW! 43 0.141:,,:- t: . t, .... •-"'ti',1_::::-.:.:1-:!..s...v•-:. . ...1•..-..:: •!..ti.f.:".M4 , ..*.41,.. 1...,. ...--• , . . -.-:$.g.i.''',. ',w,,m-..,y.v,..?.-1-1.4?.E.Ata.s?. ,. I„, i: gtfmk$ 47,,„.I.,v01,--, • 1 ,.....,.: - „..,. „„.., ,6•::, ,t.,,-.',%., • Vii,^41,04•2•' '''''t.--,A,..6 gu.. ..-....-- ..."- , ..,.-...,•.,. •,,,:.,....:„..457...A. 4.1.;,,,aaa„..e,e,, • , r. ,,,.„4, ieNaiteA ,,.''*\IV.,,,:i:t...:.... • M,..,W.,a,,:,,,, ,,,,,,„„!.,,,,,,„,.:Z.,,,,, ,,,,,,,,i5i,,,,,;„4,...,,,,, y .,.. ., • _doot'=". $1,.. • • , - 4 . 4Zftk col-711V°' •ir. .4,..-:„,T,„\,,, „..,40,,, • ...44....,,,,.,,., ,.,•=5:.•... ..:, -14,', . ''• . ,,,4to.%,..•:., .o;•:•.,:t•''..,,,:••••::•:. ....e.7:4W-044is-•1 • ...o. :1••• .6.....1,,,,,Aitk; • ,NAKIW,„ '',i•-,..4:4;i'T.,,,:.:',;... ,. r4',...;••••:,:',.;,:.•, ,,•:,.. .C.'':',..,',..,.;„.... „, '• r:i.•,.....i.'5,?!...1,.}y,..,; "5',Ail.'s:40'4V,i; '',..`t`SiNIV".*:0.• -s..h:Vt ii; N.,,,..,.., .,.. ,•,.,..4.v.,,,,,, .,,,lifsis,...T: ; :k'..4.?:.',..•••;:'?..:-• -;•.'''"'•"'''''''' • '''''i*-"" '....•o4-..; ,,,10.,..i,‘,. 1'.:I 1., ,SW...3"7" ‘. '249^`,.:ti.: *,. 4' %fisfq,.•',.:: r, :,i',.,,:lfc, ',.'i %-e4:44,81,, , i.3.i.,4'i,....:ii.,.i 1...-::,-,•Houszng iyeeds and'''. Resources": ;.,z,;61:,,,,,,,,tlyg p. 0 . 4tglu,v,4„, ,. •„ea(1.0;!, LY.qt.--?:;.i...1iX ....',5,•:"t•A'.:tV.:ii:',.:-:: [...!...1.-;• •...:..".4;.'• , _IA,l'...,.y.:'. ,:r.i..•'''4411!* • .. 1-:'”,f, V.:,`=•/.."..`"th' j'ekVAV.1*-1AV, '4,4641e ti•;.:.?..'?..::.:hew, :.,.....-......a...1:3.4..;:..) az....a..1,,,::.• 4 •'''V'lliS.V.:d.'• 1: .'4131:4;44"411'' V.12'''' ''`6.41'.11. '•'.4 "...•:-.'":-. ..". -''''''-''•for the Mentally Ill, .. . „... . • _•-• . • ,• • N '4,1-,;•‘• ,..• _ 1 TA5-'-'.•4''• 4?".,. --,,`,"; ,.4e. ;:••-'i;t-,,People with Developmenla' l_Disab;lAtei.g i4 -:,-,• .':.•0' 1., „ ......-.4-,&,,, . . •;., ...,-; 4 •,,,..v: 1.,• re,--A71 s: 141.t.i'LW' 7;!.. fl ;A4fli‘: [.:.i:"....2.100*.s...hal a'-''''il'It"ii:;S.:4-i4'.:.'.b.5 ikinCee1/4'b4.5 `r..5j'13.111-11 41.5:114.1:401 ',..::is's'''.'"Ii"!Aii14,'',. ' ''.. "3- •.'').;',I1': o.?;1'.'r 1 ...1Vie.i': F•:g:o4lo::'•'1';'•-•"',11-,i`. :'..', •:•••••:•:.'.• •••••':•,,:::.`:. ./.. : ttl.r..'1:14.*. 41;:.'•• +"•••:!'•:"1:•24iffk., .,:e*.".A..tro.li .0. ).•, •.,• , L ,i-......,.... ... Riihawa'y and Homeless Youth .-q', i-A•veiv---44-i . '. - •40., • .4‘.. • ...- • .ip•r115:44%,h'„ ^ •ir'•:;:`•,., 7.. a..144'at and People wzthAIDS .-reet,u.„„..„• •-•.,,,.. ,......1 .....,..•...• :„....•.... ...„ .,•• ., ::•,,..,• ...•.,..,„.,..„,..., ..,4,.. . .. ,,,.,,,,,i.x.,,,..,...,,,,..,;•,„, t,,,,,,,,.,,,a,,,,14.1 .,,,1,: ,,,,,i1-4,--...-.• , ,[-164-40 tortin-§vft int!,-p•-,p.x.L.4 ,122m., • ., , 'c'."3 444"....,, '44:4,4'...'• •':,t''Yii-o.',%e',..!:T•''?"°9.9.""M• •-•,r.''or.`4":4,51ri• • 4:r..'. -.... ON.V.14,' .:.•••:o...i.'*0.? :*4''' '.. ., '': • 0,,04.,.! ..0. FfNi•ti'-wiy,1 r.,.R,Pft::•';'8"::;?..; •31:431;r:crigo'ff", :-0, •+.-<... 'IP; P',.,..;e''''''' '.451 :if, •..,h . ..? ••••• e.. • G . • , G„....., 4.4,•.., r.-.,4.1..,,,,,131,4.1 .ov...1,1t4 o,..,-....,ope ,..q.,,,,..p.-4.%....., ,t1 s'', . ' 'li..4 ,,,„,..7 ,. A :.0..W.tir•••••... X444"*....4 C.. W...7 4..•x?„, wt..", 7.,,-;,.•- t.,,W,i4.0,1?-.0•-:.•••••:' 'Po-`',V-9:•'•.,"•`,'' 44.',M.',E04'.'.,,11 4?•••..P .0^ ,•••,,,:t ' .,..... 11,, •,,,44 e. .c•e I/P'-1?-2PA.4 • •Ile....kat . tar-a2:AtIl ,a-f6.-:::(44":..;..6.1 g.'-.4-a3.%,..1..1a.=.1.1 ..Leztf. ....61‘;; LkaaLely.,-.:: .s..a.,.. • . ,;.......;.;:.,::..,:1,:-...*,,k....4 .,‘, . ...?,,..:77.: ,./44A,. . .,, • . . , • ';f414t: . .:%. . . .• •PAN1` 4fiffiPo4,, 'Alb.* '.'.4,„,.,,,,,i% ,•,--.00,,,:i'..,!•.'...,....,2,-41*-Js.:"‘i%'''',:::;::4.1•4:4$7..:.',...- ;.,.:,' „....„,,,, ,,„,1. -• ,..,-,, .• ,ip, - 4;1.421,1 :41.10Vtr,;•:0:i 'i'i,140.4.V.i ./.' ',4344A 4i•)-_,. ..-.-4,,, : ',... -• • -i- 74,.., . . •..43&10.? ta)$'... :•1•>. ;444 ..,t4i,....0A%.,•:f- ,....' •%.•‘•t.' • ••''''' ''''''.4' ..,..4':'•••;:.:':':,'•••• ••''''.410,;.:.:: .4.:'...":•"... KnArkt, •• ;'•!. •.•,••e.,• A, .,.1' • i.•v",:`---:•1 :44.•••.?....•:.4.•"‘',:o•I'-'.1 fiky''',Veirq .`ftre *'', •,e,• --,.,4,, ..,4 ,..,.....,,t4 . . 0-v..:,.44.•••: •4;•-1,1.4 .'ir'i;.V. ••'•: •ofVa''skIff• ' • • i•V•,;*kl.4 't •, .,rfrn•o • de,,,,,,,,, ,i, ,f4e3 elio..-1..,:iT4 ..,-..v •••,. •;•.?„, kt,•'-• ' ,-). ... . . ,,, -V ' ... .....„ . ..,,,,,,..4... .,.../;L,-.. •••.•.:,,,,,,,nia..0.. •.,. 1.,:.6....,.1.4..er o,1.f•.,` .: AroficiA •'• lipkilti !i. 40,,,,,9,ii ,c4,,,s4.1,41-.4 ilti-sTrAg .f,',./40 . 2, ;1;467,...:.,•0:00'','.?,,,', ::nrkit.',SX:*j;:n9.(..,*, ,„. , .,',,..k.ktc),•-e:,;9..-e: :. , ka,-r.aca .-•, .•• ,•• %.' ;'4‘.ixtgo.:;:u.1,- 3 ..:Ca..... :L.Okt.:. .43,14 4 &N.A.': 4 ••• ... ,. ...... ...... .... ,.. .,.. ,,,s,,,,..;14f,::if,v.•,..,5;.:....N.:,!.::.,,,,,,::•,.:,:M:'_.:0•5•.'.''..:1'.•''.';.!::,'.... • • '•••:':'' •:.•!‘..•',:•' .:'.;.Y..::.,:.i`Y.11!....e::‘,;7;'•T.-•''.;:•<'''7•:':'..•.''.''''''X.:k.'';•te',,,•••'•''• '•• ,, i,,:p . .k 0,3..*. 14,:,,,?..,., ,_ ,....4.1),„• ,..,."..........„ • .,,,,,,i.. --,:-.,,.. '• -•.-",,,,:„...:. *;:,',.,;' '.,,:ii0.40,...,k,::`.''..:',..,••-.40.010.' :. „ -...N- ,k '11, z•,....k.:',...t.' • X'‘.-•••'..p,k Ytt•L': '•,:g:•,i.".;•11t:.W..B.L.4..,4•0: :'''4.04,4,-r. ,,,,,'• ''.' .•,.' % o••• ....0 .'''...., ..• .. y? , ,,. om ....,"';0. . • pe4..ct.,-0.5,,,,ilil ,...,,,14,9,,4,?,4.,.. „,-,.4,..,,t.tk.fel ..,.,.. ,... t.. -...1 . .4,..,1,,, ,1•:,,,i..,:•,:.„4:04.p,-,Tirm.$47,--4.-fo.;,:::•wypiaino,,,.. ..... ,.:1.. ,t.F'17'.‘444,0., ,:,,,; „0.4,04-i-•0 d,,'9',,. ••0.; 0..,,,,,,,e,-.44 .1,11.:.4iy.w.4 -,..s li..fs, „-- ;,,,,o,c, . ,..A‘ ... . VA,J.,,,,,I...i.>-,•.1`f. ••t'.,t,,,,,4,6`•/(1 - -''-`v ai:'"4, •. : 4.-...„.• ,kei , 10,,,,e. .,,,-4,01,44, :I,. ., . ..••,...:1,:,..„,.._, • . w.4;•44.,,,,• . y.;,1: '',..,1...!.`•.••••45,A4,'...,••, 11',11.1.0. ,••3.4,?•"i:',••• .o.k.o:m.NAety•'.' '.'" .•••• ,15:•:,,0 tt. ......s teikk,..,,,r4t .. • ,,,,,p,..,,.t..., ,,,,,,,„..„....1.,„4.....,,t.. ,.... .• .5.:•I ...•.,w,.,•,. .,... .,, t ,N.,....4A4,.....4.N , *.:,,,.....415,17.0..1,1;:,,,,,,.4..,,z.,, ,,...:...4.,:x...,.:,.:...f,:.:,•....e.,...A.,.,.,,„,,,,, .',..). ,..... A ..'4' 4 .":l'"'''''''''Vlity; • • %.i:0•Zi.. .t..ttf...•:•40?1,11,, •k•,.1- .•.c.e•eacca „••••,..f.; :A....v....I.:,. .. ,,,:e....•->:,...•,....k•t. II!• , ' .., •.••. -• '• .0fAi4,,.':•'•P'ii'''.•...:,:',...?‘ sIP'•iii,:..'' '''•"?''' ',e.'''''..,..4.:4):••., *'...',i.:'. •. '"'.-. , '. ..s• ''•-•',Or:4,,Oh, • ,t‘'IV't4.J. .,,,,,,, ,k,f31. .o. :"ip,,, .$ ,..4,4 , . ,i) ..• ...• '4, • ..e• 60144d&e'04-''''''• r.,00;70.M, •s:'1,,„A.,1*.::,..J.el'ill ,I•i0*,'i:.;•t!ifi••;•11.5P •;',1,14.A.Z;FAT,V) •lt 44,07.e..:.. . A...6•..4"i0.•,S':••: .•!::•••.•=4'4:;‘71"t410,..:104,. .:::•::.i.t.".1,..t,fektf..:.00.0..,(A.'., •.1„ OV10:9•04•' 11454v4.0) ii-ftkiti IrittP3:1-m: ....;.AfAN.61) Iv.:4.";i4 . ..e....•n.,•weiit-,;:.:-li,:A.,,,,•,4,- r•'•'. ''',41,,,,V,,,ke, ' .. . •';'Wti'.A;X.1")N • :.'V.:.‘,'1,04 ' NV i ....I.k,.:,.'....,..,:.4:41 .P•,..!..%...4— ,',-...M.ktro•'...1. • i.:.' -A,,r,,,50...)„4,'-‘,,,,---044., 1 • atto-cv.Ri.,i 4.4 .vui,P,..i........1.-•i, ,..,..,..!:,.?F`:'..,7X,:r44% '''.5.,,,',4,,,,.;!-'44-: ..-. Silt ....%;. .t.1. r'• ..•..'• ' . ,:-'' -1 '•'• •• .' . '. ' - lrei:kil,:.,,afr.ale:i•. V., .4j.,04,,,..i,f..::::: toU4,4,`.:1.e,.,..."..-:.,. 1..v;:n...,,........., -,.......1........ .... ..... ,... . -t,..,,r.. ,,X. • 4.'4K.4% •,,,mio.„.. • -,..., .„•,•••-•.too>, •• ,,r:'!.:ii•-..,,. eftt'.0.,, _...... .e)..,..1,. ,,r,.f„,* ,,,1154,-;,,,-it,....., ,..... „„,....,,,...,;., ,,ie,,,c,...„.p,N, r.,.,.."..„..,,..!„..;....:,.... „„:„.„...:,:...;...,., e.r.:.:;.-:...,;............ „..,...,..•.. , . • 1..,• • ,..,,,,.,,,,,,_,,r, .r..:„.,/,/;0.,,,,,.:,..,./A 0:41,14a.1117.5., 4,11, .t.,,,,,,,z..41 .. , tc.,,,I,,v, 1..,n-,-.3--,%'&.444.i • 1.,1.04s.,..A.i.2;,;...9.,,,.':: FE,..--.:..1,::;,...:•,i.......,.:::: :..,...,,‘.....!,..,„:,.....,• r- Deeember:1987i1x7.,,-; I.,::::411;zoi,f0 mic140.!..,T,zi:„..,N „14.,..„‘prel,,,,41, ,,,,,yOiir,;:,,,,,.$. t, ..,•:1!,%•!".."::,.;;;,„...,;a3.r.4, ,....:::•.,..,,-. .,..•"1,-;:•:.:. ,-.'..:•',:."/,'• —. , . ..., .....,....-.:-., • .•,.: ..":•••'1,.....,....... :A:...•::.J.,,?„,.:.4:i. .:1.!....,`,..,,V4'. .V..:•• Vit,T.,,Ati.f.,::.: :. ,.::,::,:!'... :':r...S.:.:::F'S, .',.'.''':..,`:::' :.. - ',',•';.:.:. .. .. • ,,, ".:'.....:. , -.- ..• k.-. .., t.,-: .•-•.,--...,•••••••••,:.”- "..t-....,,",!'''".• ,''•'.1 ...".'••••-'.....:-.: '....'•,,..'...-.:t..'•i;%•.1•,!1A.14t7Vi'''.*.i......,Y;:i.'..`'... :..-'.,'..-"•'..,'..'..%""7,.'":7:•:,•'.. ':'..'0;'',''.Z.Af•'u..,e •'''....,i,.:,1'...v ifr: ' l' '5... ^,'r •':,,`w', ':i -.•1•ti.-.."- '"'' ' •V.,' •••v.,.• ,•.....d4-.. . .,....:, .•..,,..al .t..,.....,.-.., - .. • • . . • . ' •. , • ,. • • • - • • . • . , • • . ... . ,. . . • . . .. . • . • • • • - , . . . .: . . • .- • • . . • •• . . . N PEOPLEWITH D :.�;:, EVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES !"` 1 • Background ,:: .. •'{ ill basedIJ1' Community housingfor " . people with developmental disabllities, as an alternative' to t: , state institutions, has its roots in the deinstitutionalization movement. Institutional set= tings were first developed in the nineteenth century as a service model, a way of t� grouping people with special needs. By the late 1960s and early 1970s, however, a ` ,:?iw i number of both legal and theoretical issues had evolved which strengthened:the mo• ve I ` ;1 away from institutions. �'::s r fir • Lawsuits and litigation citing abuse and neglect were significant factors In the closure of many institutions. Court decisions mandated deinstitutionalization and the creation of "' residential alternatives in tale community. At about the same time, the community ''l' environment was promoted as the best means for encouraging Individual growth. The :1 concept of normalization would provide the opportunity for integration into normal life and habilitation would sup port the provision of services in the least restrictive setting. ;i The conceptsn and habilitation were supported ;�I � by state and federal ti j of normalizatio legislation passed in the 1970s. The 1975 Developmental Disability Assistance and. Bill of ' ' Rights Act provide for protection and advocacy of human and legal rights and the promo- �,i j placement. It also man- Lion of deinstitutionalization and normalization through community '.+i : J dated the states to use at least 30 percent of their federal grants to develop plans to eliminate inappropriate institutional placements.3 • Taken together, the deinstitutionalization movement and su ' t p . pporting legislation has resulted 1 in a variety of residential alternatives for people with developmental disabilities. f.' Community residential facilities for people with developmental disabilities in the United States grew from 611 in 1972 . '. �+�• ", -1974 to 6,414 in 19824. •Current housing philosophy for these individuals promotes choice and an array of residential options provided in the least II TM.` • II. ( 3Community Acceptance of Group Homes in Ohio, the Association for the Develop-' :i' mentally Disabled, p. 2. i,: 4Siting Group Homes for Developmentally Disabled Persons, American Planning Asso- 1'ciation, October 1986, p. 1, r . E ij 14y 1 ra 19 t1 ' ! t �; ; ill" Ill • i ,'H 0 . . i Housing Problems and Barriers • i . : While strides have been made in providing the developmentally disabled with alternatives • to institutional settings, housing problems continue to hinder the move toward the least • restrictive residential options. • One of the primary housing problems faced by individuals with developmental disabilities is simply limited income in relation to the costs of the private housing market. Using the • commonly accepted standard for affordability,5 an individual with the average income of the developmentally disabled on public assistance could afford monthly rent of $111. ii: Iv Average rents, however,- range from $288 to $461 in Seattle neighborhoods• and $358 to !? , . $573 in the remainder of communities in King County. The basic issue of affordability is ! , intensified by the .necessity (for most individuals with developmental disabilities) for sup- 1 portive services combined with adequate residential settings. Such settings are often ! supervised and provide training and support that enable individuals to live as indepen- dently as possible.t. 'f • The location of housing is also crucial. It :must be accessible to public transportation and community services such as grocery stores, banks, and post offices. However, ,is c't:. appropriate and affordable housing in adequate locations is difficult to find. Further, ser- + it vice providers report landlord discrimination as a significant problem. li £w 1 Existing housing programs for people with developmental disabilities have limited space, ill due to limited funding; and public housing authorities maintain long waiting lists. ,i: Advocates and providers strongly feel that people with developmental disabilities should i;; ;r have a range of choices in housing type and location. Current programs have been suc- i. ..•;. • cessful in expanding community-based options, but lack sufficient. funding and staff to t1 better serve those with housing problems. Other barriers include: n 1 • ° Rent increases have affected housing for the developmentally disabled as with others ,?;i u 1, emi who lack sufficient financial resourcesta, . Public assistance income can only be `,.I ,;.;�. A;�; stretched so far to pay for the typical costs of living. •, ,. rq : 11Tc, Ac..,3 i 1 5The commonly accepted affordability standard is 30 percent of gross income for f !s K4. housing costs (rent or mortgage payment) plus utilities. . tj: 1. V.` 21 'i, J1I lrai.-_ (i • • .a' +4 'i . ,° Group Homes - There are 26 adult group homes in the County (16 of .which are in ' ' ., i; the City of Seattle), serving about 190 people. Settings Include single ;family resi-. �. dences and units specifically developed to• serve the developmentally disabled, typi- . 11,11 daily housing p 6 to 8 people. The majority of these units were constructed in the, Ill early 1980s using either HUD 202 or Washington State Referendum 37 funding. I!�; Acquisition for both leased and owned single family residences •has been funded • through private resources, and King County and the City of Bellevue Community i+. Development Block Grant funds. Rents are pooled from client Income (generally SSI) P to cover building costs (lease or mortgage payments). Operating costs are provided . • .j .by DDD. • ° Institutions for the Mentally Retarded (IMR) - IMR's are designated as levels A through E and include state institutions, funded directly by the state; community-based, which ';( have either 24 .hour or 8 hour nursing care, and community based which purchase 'i, nursing services on an as-needed basis. In King County, 280 adults are served in 3 '! • C-level IMR's and 66 in 10 E-level.' • 1 • ° Other Community Residential Settings . • : . ?' Adult Family Home = With a subsidy from the State, private individuals take people with developmental disabilities into their own homes. I. Boarding Home,- This setting provides long term board and care. Homeshare - This is an innovative concept using family members as staff in a group 'i . * home project. A proposed project in East King ,County will serve five Individuals with ill no operational funding from DDD. Assisted Housing - Some individuals have been assisted by tenant support programs .,1 in locating apartments in HUD Section 202/Section 8 developments for the elderly Ii , and handicapped. p Public Housing Authorities • . • • •• Estimates of Housing Need • • Although the array of housing for the developmentally disabled has increased in the past few years, many, individuals continue to be housed in inappropriate settings. A .1986 sur- • , vey of DDD case managers concerning residential needs illustrates the problem. Case • managers identified 292 individuals needing more appropriate settings and recommended • . the residential options in Table 4. An additional 612 individuals who are King County residents need subsidized housing or are in state institutions and targeted to return • • . home. . • • • 24 • TABLE OF CONTENTS GOOD SHEPHERD GROUP HOME 19TH STREET REZONE & CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT • REQD FOR REQD FOR CONDITIONAL ITEM SUBJECT REZONE USE PERMIT SECT MASTER APPLICATION X X 1 • EXHIBIT 1 LEGAL DESCRIPTION X X 2 EXHIBIT 2 QUIT CLAIM DEED X X 3 EXHIBIT 3 TITLE INSURANCE X - X 4 EXHIBIT 4 ENVIRONMENTAL CK LIST X X 5 EXHIBIT S SITE PLAN X X 6 EXHIBIT 6 ARCHITECTURAL . X X 7 • ELEVATION DWGS EXHIBIT 7 REDUCED SITE PLAN X X B EXHIBIT 8 PROJECT DESCRIPTION X X 9 EXHIBIT 9 POLICY ANALYSIS X X 10 PAPER ;# 11 EXHIBIT 10 PRINCETON STUDY X X 11 DTD 11-30-82 EXHIBIT 11 PRINCETON STUDY X X 12 DTD 8-31-78 EXHIBIT 12 UNIV. OF DAYTON STUDY X X 13 EXHIBIT 13 STATE UNIV. OF N.Y. X X 14 STUDY - EXHIBIT 14 K.C. ASSESSOR MAP X 1S ( am&p ) EXHIBIT 15 AREA MAP X X 16 EXHIBIT 16 SIGNATURES IN SUPPORT X <:T o' '" "`` - OF THE PROJECT p FEB 2 41988 GSW-012.ers BUILDING/ZONING DEPT. PaAt av EC.-- O l b OF R4,, 40 © z THE RENTON CITY COUNCIL y oako MUNICIPAL BUILDING • 200 MILL AVENUE SOUTH • RENTON, WASHINGTON 980550 235-2586 n ammo: 04,47. ED SEPSVOP MEMORANDUM TO: Nancy Mathews,, Chair DATE: 11/13/87 Community Services Committee FROM: Billie SUBJECT: Good Shepherd Home Mary Lou Harbeck, 3507 NE 11th, Renton, WA 98056, phoned to express support of the proposed Good Shepherd Home. • CITY OF RENTON HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING AGENDA COMMENCING AT 9: 00 A.M. , TUESDAY, JULY 5, 1988 COUNCIL CHAMBERS, SECOND FLOOR, RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING The applications listed are in order of application number only and not necessarily the order in which they will be heard. Items will be called for hearing at the discretion of the Hearing Examiner. RENTON VILLAGE CINEMA Application for site plan approval to allow the construction of a new eight-plex cinema consisting of 36,253 sq. ft. and 2,260 seats on the site of existing three-plex cinema which will be demolished. GOOD SHEPHERD OF WASHINGTON- GROUP HOME FOR THE DEVELOPMENTALLY DISABLED Proposal to rezone a . 847 acre parcel from R-1 (Single Family Residential) zoning to G-1 (General Use) zoning and application for a conditional use permit to develop a six resident, six bedroom group home for the developmentally disabled on the subject site. Property located on the south side of N.E. 19th Street at the 3900 block, between Union Avenue and Shelton Avenue N.E. ECF-010-88 ; R-010-88 ; CU-010-88 June 27, 1988 • RE: PUBLIC HEARING GOOD SHEPHERD OF WASHINGTON - GROUP HOME FOR THE DEVELOPMENTALLY DISABLED FILE NOS. ECF-010-88; R-010-88; CU-010-88 LOCATION: SOUTH SIDE OF N.E 19TH STREET AT THE 3900 BLOCK, BETWEEN UNION AND SHELTON AVENUE N.E. A public hearing before the City of Renton Land Use Hearing Examiner has been scheduled for Tuesday, July 5, 1988. The public hearing commences at 9:00 a.m. in the Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall. The applicant or representative(s) of the applicant is required to be present at the public hearing. A copy of the staff report will be available prior to the public hearing. If you have any questions, please call the Building and Zoning Department at 235-2550. Sincerel Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator DKE:db:sr gcS?)--) NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON HEARING EXAMINER RENTON, WASHINGTON A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS ON THE SECOND FLOOR OF CITY HALL, RENTON, WASHINGTON, ON JULY 5, 1988, AT 9: 00 A.M. TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS: GOOD SHEPHERD GROUP HOME FOR THE DEVELOPMENTALLY DISABLED Proposal to rezone a .847 acre parcel from R-1 (Single Family Residential) zoning to G-1 (General Use) zoning and application for a conditional use permit to develop a six resident, six bedroom group home for the developmentally disabled on the . subject site. Property located on the south side of N.E. 19th Street at the 3900 block, between Union Avenue and Shelton Avenue N.E. ECF-010-88 ; R-010-88 ; CU-010-88 RENTON VILLAGE CINEMA Application for site plan approval to allow the construction of a new eight-plex cinema consisting of 36,253 sq. ft. and 2,260 seats on the site of existing three-plex cinema which will be demolished. Located in the Renton Village complex at 25 South Grady Way. ECF-090-87 ; SA-103-87 Legal descriptions of the files noted above are on file in the Renton Building and Zoning Department. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT THE PUBLIC HEARING ON JULY 5, 1988, AT 9:00 A.M. TO EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS. Published: June 24 , 1988 . OF Rp.� h�1' TFD SEPSI'� 1� 1 1,11;kaff y of Renton Land Use Hearin Examiner will hold a i s : ' in CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS , - CITY HALL. ON .TTTT.Y 9, - 1988 BEGINNING AT•' 9 . 00 A.M. P.M. CONCERNING: ECF—010-88 , R-010-88 , CU-010-88 GOOD SHEPHERD GROUP HOME FOR THE DEVELOP— MENTALLY DISABLED PROPOSAL TO REZONE A . 847 ACRE PARCEL FROM R-1 (SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL) ZONING TO G-1 (GENERAL USE) ZONING AND APPLICATION FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO DEVELOP A SIX RESIDENT, SIX BEDROOM GROUP HOME FOR THE DEVELOPMENT— ALLY DISABLED ON THE SUBJECT SITE 1 ' .S ♦ ti t ) 1 � I. _1f t,.•_f� la 1•f• n 1• 1� � 1�► � -� fff -� - t i .„ —,;;; ii, _ .. , _ .. 101 �� ZOT .. •. /L% .' I. N'T 1+-Iii �• L' I • is, 4`l4aN j itsi "' G ' ' 1 a • Otto 202 _. : r Jo r % 'iI'o '• '2 J '„ 701 t ., .:e. I s 1, I _ 1 s pe Y)DV� 0013N-�r , - - -�,. �4 �, mom® ,s . . 1 1I .l ' /! 11 •I ` i . 1 t.. .. 1 - I 1 a. I. ;a +. 1 -....�eo� �ty� `�i. , '4(IN(0. 0 ly 41 ;1- .e.al , 1 s 7�'•i ' '.J e. M.m �M���iois a to1 1 `:II� > �� III lI ';;' . ,:a •ld__ BUe= Gel" EN° °16��t J.Q S t' . ee. Y. • �1 : e • - 1/I 1�lY I3I4�C 7 E t'J w 11 .t 1. 1� IC;C.1,1. 1 . I � ' ` R-2 G 1 ; j 1 �. 1 I B, I c-------i- . Q- 1 l l S(, I, • .' , 1I ! , 1yS �... 1 • III �� .• N C 1 l I ` 1 1 �� W 1 1 —� ,,��""� ' ' 11 III I `l ,< , R N 1 1 GENERAL LOCATION AND/OR ADDRESS: PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF N.E . 19th.• STREET AT THE 3900 BLOCK, BETWEEN UNION AVENUE AND SHELTON AVENUE N.E. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CALL THE CITY OF . RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT 235-2550 THIS NOTICE NOT TO BE . REMOVED;.' WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON HEARING EXAMINER RENTON, WASHINGTON A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS ON THE SECOND FLOOR OF CITY HALL, RENTON, WASHINGTON ON JULY 5, '1988 • , AT 9:00 A.M. TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS: • • CONCERNING• O GOOD SHEPHERD B GROUP HOME FOR THE DEV -• ELOP MENTALLY DISABLED PROPOSAL TO REZONE A .847 ACRE PARCEL FROM R-1 . (SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL) ZONING TO G-1 (GENERAL USE) ZONING AND APPLICATION FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO DEVELOP-A SIX RESIDENT, SIX BEDROOM GROUP HOME 'FOR THE DEVELOPMENT- ALLY .DISABLED ON THE SUBJECT SITE. • GENERAL LOCATION AND/OR ADORES • S. PROPERTY. LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF N.E. 19th.•STREET AT, THE 3900 B BETWEEN UNION AVENUE AND SHELTON ,AVENUE N.E. LOCK, Legal descriptions of the files noted above are on file in the Renton Building and Zoning Department. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT THE PUBLIC HEARING ON JULY 5, 1988 , AT 9:00 A.M. TO EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS. PUBLISHED : JUNE z4, 1988 Ronald G. Nelson Building and Zoning Director 651KIZ''r •�- CERTIFICATION I. T. L vo , HEREBY CERTIFY THAT 1 N.1 ( I COPIES OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENTS WERE POSTED BY ME IN CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON OR NEARYBY THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED ABOVE A PRESCRIBED BY LAW. ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a Notary Public, inAnd for the State of Washington residing in c 3 the '� �, dayofq on - � T1t.�mo� •l J ) �g • BEF z .e,a t " , y qu.,5fkogri p EXp....... SIGNED: �/✓1d rap; IAR},Ar'• • G 'z� k* pUo- 44:o,►` V •••1/0 \ 0$ #214 �.' F OF BPS;rl • , 17 1. .0,U ,i a ,• - _ 1A IIJ 4 1 - 1 Z 3 . ' 'mav ;c *� b I 1 1 9 _ 4 • -t j I t88 27r n . E 101 •' a2c 11 A imi, 2 W 5T . S 69� 276 ;• 1 / I� t1 1 II ) 114 t • S 2 !' ! . v at�OZ 275 277 p e Q �1 / , i2 ill Sj`/_ 1/11 �� ! ! tt'lte• $7Y 274 27 � i i 4 � IS •f � S r _ .rT Ig .:. � J 2 4 i.7 IS 7 - -- _ :299-49--.1:2,:k. /a12 i1 9 I 1 Ib a ! to •,I ills I• Ir .e I• - IIIIII ?95 , 4'4/ 21 1 �}_ io al P. l�l' b r ,= 5� 1,, 40 296 V 4 7 111 s ] q f 11.. 35 �r �_ ST _ t9� asl 2 ,4 •� . • - 6, Q -- 39 30 29 2 S % !` C_ 8 to � )b )� . ie t '., tSo ?S7 2S3 ! 11ell. •o •r1 299 249 "-� 7S !9 ai a 2CB 2'\ 294 •� 4� S, 30o L� t 10 2 } f I - I 301 p 7R , _0( 1" \.8 s 1 ii I 30? u+ ? ii., 260� .1 • •s �N y 1 l > . L I Sot a��451`a43 4. IN lei Q` a r._ ._..,r.. . • 3 l04, N E. 20 '8., 7 , 1 • - _ 4 • is . ., L .Li._ 2 I 1 ,9 1 I I 1 1. -4 oe /- so 9.:"; es ce '. ,a 1 - ..5 A� g 8 t94 7p L. 9--+ y r � GI ? ....• — I. •• ''''"-skr Ippy ... 1 r.! o r • ., 1 1 W T BS 1'5£,I 'N 1 I 1 L p 14 I - • I bo yrµITMOH ti3. 11i �c 1 _ 3 84 81 S`"msd •- 7!-" 5T , 1 t� l � '�1 14 2 EL to / A 1 • ( ` _ - 1 85 8Z �♦ Si SQ SI e� 1 9 -- Q ' I u E - _ - 7 T�1 r` 29 ` aR^2 \ I I I Z 3 4 S G 7 8 9 l0 11 ,z G-!, i II 1 I R-2 � St,,111111 NMI' ' R- 3 1 '4 � 19 . . t _ 2 .1I .o a Q 1 Mil R WM 2 14 N E 1d,"ST , 1 1 LO �� -'s_ la 2 6 Z • 1 1 . 7 d . 5 • 5 1 1 kJ ,J - 20 n .2 , 0 j~ 1 1 _ 2 _. 1 I i ' F. . Ca • -,,. ,, _______. • —'�` ..._L ST WIWI imi 1 7 I I 1 9 fir' B' i 3 --, 0 6 2 Z _ 9 i • 4 • 01111 -��r a _ _ }__ _ • • _' R IITtr •o I �r _S ....14 4 ^d �_ ti ai o•- y 1• Lth± Q Iz W zo 11 `EI � Z 7 Z ! 1 •1 1 Q T 1 w I1T� O N E Illn 19 ' —_ , ��(� 7 I .o I U 2 ....ii 51 t I 8 c I 2 y 2 1 1� 1111112.11W ill" t4Z i 4 1 N- to4.` W l 1 Z WI \.? O C 9 18 u 10*H }n •i�-� �I 4 S 1 N E 7 �e a 87 II t ' 1 i �• is t ,2 H[ I•Clc bl II __ 1 3 Ib au 1 1 _- 114 4 �`1 ‘ -1 4 I //I 4. I I Al I IsY w v �i i III '6 __ I -- -•--_'F.. L Q_---� `1e so 8 I lb L B -`t , '6I I S >> a J J r t - ` u9N E au,. .•• Q I, ,7 1 7 O•s 7l a _-' _..: I c , N i T 1 _ -- a G. 4 aC Y,, S t ,� - �� !FT-FT G- 7 - .o , ;• ® , ©e A IS I toe�o • = 3 2 • 0 9 e . 11 _ LANE ,L; _• ,: t , f :• ° , LO�A'f'10 OF _ I j i 1 • Rtt .lL �eRING) S n 1= 11 14 if ,~ ie I• w O r-r= ,^ I.- /NTH ST btiewtisodC 1 r'l _ 7_1.el.•_.1i ,' i I81 ,A 'IeI = ,'I2J' I'I=J' 11]•IS .iI5 = 1 • 1 - _ 064 3ULI 5 - `qbb :.. OF R4� E' . • ^. 1 ,I s U < yw eb O9O9frv' Pro :• ` ,,, ,, d'At+i9,' • y %:, ND PEPS ;.,.,%{' City • 6 (, i of Renton Land Use HearingExaminer will hold a z. ,, ° , , :j I IS • PUBLIC . NEARING CITY (COUNCIL CHAMBERS , —CITY HALL ON JUNE 28 , 1988 BEGINNING AT 9 :o0AM.' P.M. COIVCERNING• GOOD SHEPHERD B SHEPHERD GROUP HOME FOR THE DE VELOP- MENTALLY DISABLED - PROPOSAL TO REZONE A . 847 ACRE PARCEL FROM R-1 . (SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL) ZONING TO G-1 (GENERAL USE) ZONING AND APPLICATION FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO DEVELOP A SIX RESIDENT, SIX BEDROOM GROUP HOME FOR THE DEVELOPMENT- ALLY DISABLED ON THE SUBJECT SITE. ' .. // �••= C. 4 ! • l• Lr -1•t1 '. ':, i • . 1 Ja • t. t , t•0 i 1 't 1�® t0i ►01 QI w l mf --- '! --� — • for r. 4e.e 1r8,11• • )o, >`•a�:• 4! �' 14 o .4!oe t •ice 1 /Q / -, j'•r 1 S_ . I Ql .• .` Oco.i ®S� •.D ao 31 KKK, GOVNTI. 1t' ; � }�r, - (,� is eild •I I. - �' ' •r i • • - i ' 1 I .1 I _... e•� va.®a JI 1. ! • I ' g ' a, i- P: t r1 1 s s, %.- ,A�i�* JJ le G_OU Tr 1 Z 3 4I IGI7 ® SOlrl rl n u sr.,c Si. • 1.21 o R^2 r °e i 1 1 B- I 1 1 x 1 . R-2r 1 R7-3U•' • 7/ 1 1rS • R�2 Vr ""' It ,.L"1, 1 J� .....--"--.-; ;OP t. 1.. _- A.. W� 1 j -, 1 I lic-- ri---- . 3 , . . . GENERAL LOCATION AND/OR ADDRESS: PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF N.E. 19th.• STREET AT THE 3900 BLOCK, BETWEEN UNION AVENUE AND SHELTON AVENUE N.E. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CALL THE CITY OF RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT 235-2550 THIS NOTICE NOT TO BE REMOVED ::�WITHOUT • - PROPER AUTHORIZATION • NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON HEARING EXAMINER RENTON, WASHINGTON A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS ON THE SECOND FLOOR OF CITY HALL, RENTON, WASHINGTON, ON JUNE 28, 1988, AT 9: 00 A.M. TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS: GOOD SHEPHERD GROUP HOME FOR THE DEVELOPMENTALLY DISABLED Y-- Proposal to rezone a .847 acre parcel from R-1 (Single Family Residential) zoning to G-1 (General Use) zoning and application for a conditional use permit to develop a six resident, six bedroom group home for the developmentally disabled on the subject site. Property located on the south side of N.E. 19th Street at the 3900 block, between Union Avenue and Shelton Avenue N.E. ECF-010-88 ; R-010-88; CU-010-88 RENTON VILLAGE CINEMA Application for site plan approval to allow the construction of a new eight-plex cinema consisting of 36,253 sq. ft. and 2,260 seats on the site of existing three-plex cinema which will be demolished. Located in the Renton Village complex at 25 South Grady Way. ECF-090-87; SA-103-87 Legal descriptions of the files noted above are on file in the • Renton Building and Zoning Department. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT THE PUBLIC HEARING ON JUNE 28, 1988, AT 9: 00 A.M. TO EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS. Published: June 17, 1988 i. 7 7�•mi {):;f y ,. _- r -�r '� e , ( it k .Y pi°i, � ,; h. ,0F, r ;h t 1t, � I '(af } '•'+,. � aI,. K ^ �' �A# . i ENVIRcNP.AENTILE : ' . ,r .DECLARATION , ... ... ,....,, . . . .. . . APPLICATION NO. ECF-010-88, R-010-88, CU-010-88 APPLICANT GOOD SHEPHERD GROUP HOME FOR THE DEVELOPMENTALLY DISABLED ' P(b1NGQLE FAMILYACTION IDENTIAL)SAL TO ZONINGRTOONE G-1A .847(GENERALRUSE)RCEL ZONINGOMANDI APPLICATION FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO DEVELOP A SIX RESIDENT, SIX BEDROOM GROUP HOME FOR THE DEVELOPMENTALLY DISABLE ON THE SUBJECT GENERAL LOCATION AND/OR ADDRESS • LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF N.E. 19th ST. AT THE 3900 BLOCK, BETWEEN UNION AVENUE AND SHELTON AVENUE N.E. • • • POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION. . THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (E.R.C.) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE : PROPOSED ACTION DOES ' 1><1 DOES NOT • ' • HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT l I WILL II• WILL NOT • • BE REQUIRED. j . THE CITY OF RENTON WILL' NOT ACT ON THIS PROPOSAL FOR 15 DAYS FROM THE DATE BELOW. COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY • AN APPEAL OF THE ABOVE DETERMINATION MAY BE FILED WITH THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER .. BY 5:00 P.M., JUNF 10, 1988 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT AT 235-2550. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE • WITHOUT PROPER_ AUTHORIZATION. CERTIFICATION • • •• I , R.R`� Li IJ�O , HEREBY CERTIFY THAT � ( IU .�°) • COPIES OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENT WAS POSTED BY ME IN '( ...( IG) CONSPICUOUS PLACES ' ON OR• NEARBY' THE DESCRIBED PROPERTY. ON ••ouw 01, icia8 0,0... r ��S�° BF�va w•••••§ tIn ST; Subscribed•and sworn to before me, a c �DN EX—g ootiky Public, in and for theState of Washington "''• ; Q�i -tARa,Tpi•isiAng in Pf&J1 )k) on the 9a �Q '%�10��, `r d3v�ovo a)tE ° to18� ' • SIGNED :7'V : ti .• v lit. �"9-TF OF•V tO1 0 o�� • 4 s 17. 4 ,T `/8 Dcf 1 G.e .: 11 L 1(, i I 1 1 , 14 1E to1 •T 5T )L �� l 1 w o 7qZ, / )'1 i2oIuI4Tft ±IT77 ST�� ,2 o ! Of ate. S7 �r2 92 2 (o ..I 2_ r W+ u._t 273 1 4 • IS p s im Maim t • ' 2 5 14 S ,�93 .1 1,' 1 /272 w /4/ _ 3 7 1 I Ib `S ! to a ,t ,3 ,. IS • •, s • to ii , 296 5 w2S2 4j M - / r1 4_ b IIIs� I ,T 5� 1p oo 5 f -- ?g7 V?)1 ,1,1 _III Or Q ( i. - I, 53 32 31 30 29 2s 27 2. tS 2, ! ?57 ]5 29 -- - 1-_ ! II . !•--. 1 3a 59 2 1- 4 4, -'42 47 44 ,1 .. ,r ,p ,f •o S. 30o z 2200 r2�tj h/ i I I �c i_v.1 l., j T 301 DI S�Tr / Io I! 7 1 S I t 1 301 7 t oo S 1 i�$4-1 4 f 24 2 '' �N T > . L I 30,: ` 6,, ,, 3 4 ' '11 Q ( N E 2 ....:--- u� �� j if-- I o )o �ol� r Z ti ` _, s _c 'o .11 i 7/ ,Itt 1 1_.: I 1 I ''-%.--ss r ', i\• I 1 'a I I '4 oa /�,e9 90 Jr95 G! ,9 1 1 _ S o® `ag �ea 70 r r �, ill!,, --. A\ ' N _ -\ SIP,/ t C > T' -. 17 Er Iw 1 I i L O `q] I 1 Ib. WNItMOP tit: 1illsgt J . 8418, �_ ate -177n ST , I 1 _ "" i!?, Li'1 83 82 �s c� si st sl 2 ° / e q 1 � -- I uE 17Tt4- /' >I ` a L9 I 1 Z 3 4 S G 7 819 ,o I I G 1 ' "o R-21 .......,,.„ 1 ,t _ _.,,,,,, �- ,R'2 � i �� R..31 tr___F I r--1 j �2 ,i�I,ulq a / I CLR_ � _ 17. 11II N E Id'"ST ' 1 L. _'_,tom T 1 (° Z 5 ,b z d • 5 5 1 . 1 \/ \ / 18. Ur .r 1111.1H- ) I I \ is 04 1 1' W t j Z 1 1 t _ G_ 7 20 n ,2 I O 1J r v 1 1 j- r�r 5 T j 4T"-� 2 n _ 1 _ —71 � I'l� j i - t�r3 4J '• 2 2 2 1 ` (.� C w Z - , - . ___Y F I 1w I 4 ) 2 I - 1.4 ~ l 117t1 f- '.o�� G' 1 S - 1J S '2. 7� z.t. 4 ., --- 43 Z ° 1_ 1- ° 12 'I HE 11'r(t — JZ y } .i , ) ut zO I 2 i. 1 7 7 , I ., I 7 • 7 1 , I li_.%2 v: •. s T e• ZO Q43 19 - 'S 1 7 ,o�, 11 c ► 2 L 1 i Th . F~ 1 ° `� _ c N E 11 1r 5�1 t "'333Q 'r:_�? `�� 7 .L 2 I 11 I I �I 5T 4��J ✓ • III.. 4 7 t� I3,4 0 1 ;. 3 • �� .( F- 9 18 ` }t 4,7 Io 3 11 �\�� 4 6 .411.4 8 I _ ± �. _0 11 S 1 N E 7 \e 0 7 N P , IU �G �2 (� �� t 12 HE IrLNc bl I' _. _ b i t. 4 ,13 ,L ,t a� 1^�L 1 1 _• a l _ e-, o g 7 I C 5 L ' s eJ 's �jh1O44" 7 T= _ IE� � ,t 12 ylfl , 1 IT51�1�( 1 I l' �`1 ., ' .T. y— ^ ci C CT i3 I t S G t 7 IA t7 . ! , I1II::` i- p -9 n , T- 10► ' L Q N E -...• t • Lcc 1(ON OF 11.4\. ) _ ��\ • S yin I s , ,i irl,. ,4 .• H1i4 ••-i1,1 E • io " OL b Ps� 1 oa 1i/�-117. rt _ .. l III:14j' f 1 fTJbS , Iat, 1 1 .n� tlel ' ` (7�t+ ls s t �I • ENVIRONMENTAL DECLARATION APPLICATION NO. ECF-010-88 , R-010-88 , CU-010-88 APPLICANT GOOD SHEPHERD GROUP HOME FOR THE DEVELOPMENTALLY DISABLED P OpP ED ACTION PROPOSAL TO REZONE A . 847 ACRE PARCEL FROM R-1 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL) ZONING TO G-1 (GENERAL USE) ZONING AND APPLICATION FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO DEVELOP A SIX RESIDENT; SIX BEDROOM GROUP HOME FOR THE DEVELOPMENTALLY DISABLE ON THE SUBJECT SITE. GENERAL LOCATION AND/OR ADDRESS LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF N.E . 19th ST. AT THE 3900 BLOCK, BETWEEN UNION AVENUE AND SHELTON AVENUE N.E. POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (E.R.C.) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES ><1 DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT WILL . WILL NOT BE REQUIRED. . THE CITY OF RENTON WILL NOT ACT ON THIS PROPOSAL FOR 15 DAYS FROM THE DATE BELOW. COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY AN APPEAL OF THE ABOVE DETERMINATION MAY BE FILED WITH THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER BY 5:00 P.M.,, JUNE 10, 1988 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT AT 235-2550. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION. r • CITY OF RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor Ronald G. Nelson, Director May 24, 1988 Washington State Department of Ecology Environmental Review Section Mail Stop PV-11 • Olympia, WA 98504 • RE: Environmental Determinations Transmitted herewith are copies of Environmental Determinations issued on May 27, 1988: DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED Good Shepherd Group Home for the Developmentally Disabled ECF-015-88; R-015-88; CU-015-88, ShPI-015-88 Good Shepherd,Group Home for the Developmentally Disabled /\ECF-010-88; R-010-88; CU-010-88 Rainier Sand & Gravel, Inc., Edwards Pit ECF-012-88; SP-012-88 City'of Renton - Public Works Department/Production Wells #10.& 11 ECF-022-88 • The Determinations are. final and may be appealed to the City's Hearing Examiner no later than 5:00 p.m. on June 10, 1988. Any appeal must state clearly in writing why the Determination should• be revised and must be accompanied by a non-refundable $75.00 filing fee. • If you have any questions, please call Jeanette Samek-McKague or me at 235-2550. Sincerely, • Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator pc: Mr. Gerald W. Marbett Mr. Gregory M. Bush • Department of Wildlife Mr. Joe Robels • 'non Mill A VPn11P Qrntth - Renton_ Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2540 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING On the Ay day of (Ma1988, I deposited in the mail of the United States a sealedenvelope containing Yf ,Q y /g[day documents. This information was sent to: NAME:Ati SIGNED BY: 044.41-&-r) PLItt/t(iceAe- SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this tK, day of i'c\( , 1988. figs Q��5°....134. °0<, oAoN 9d:o �O1ARy ; � z \{' G ; °. PUg�\ � 0 Notary tblic in and fort e State of p.: ; " • scs- Washington, OF° IN—„iF residing at }-t'p( � therein. Project Name and Number: Good Shepherd of Washington ECF-010-88 ; R-010-88; CU-010-88 • Mary Lou Harbeck,3507 N.E. llth,Renton,WA,98056 Good Shepherd of Washington, 18940 Marine View Dr. S.W. ,Seattle,WA, 98166 Darlene Lang,4751 South 172nd Place,Seattle,WA,98166 Howard R. Kienle,732 Melody Lane,Enumclaw,WA,98022 Mary L. Czaplinski, 1801 Union Ave. N.E. ,Renton,WA,98056 Carla Ba11, 1800 Union Ave. N.E. ,Renton,WA,98056 Judith W. Sheldon, 1813 Union Ave. N.E. ,Renton,WA,98056 Owen K. Ha11, 1732 Union Ave. , Renton,WA,98056 Tom Czaplinski, 1801 Union Ave. N.E. ,Renton,WA,98056 E.Bueno, 1907 Vashon Ct. N.E. ,Renton,WA,98056 Katherine L. Hawley, 1717 Union Ave. , N.E. ,Renton,WA,98056 Timothy N. Potter,1892 Shelton Ave. N.E. ,Renton,WA,98056 Jennifer L. Potter, 1892 Shelton Ave. N.E. ,Renton,WA,98056 Scott L. Surber,3839 N.E. 19th St. ,Renton,WA,98056 Annelle J. Abernithy,1609 Shelton Ave. N.E. ,Renton,WA,98056 Steve Altrinzer,1703 Shelton Ave. N.E. ,Renton,WA,98056 Cindy Altrinzer, 1703 Shelton Ave. N.E. ,Renton,WA,98056 Shirley F. Peterson, 1808 Union Ave. N.E. ,Renton,WA, 98056 Jeff Crawford,1724 Union Ave. N.E. ,Renton,WA,98056 N. L. James, 1724 Union Ave. N.E. ,Renton,WA,98056 Patricia Wallace,4205 N.E. 19th,Renton,WA,98056 I. Watkins,4211 N.E. 19th,Renton,WA,98056 Ada Jean Hi11,4100 N.E. 19th,Renton,WA,98056 Kim Tessin,4203 N.E. 19th,Renton,WA,98056 Floyd Figgins,4225 N.E. 19th,Renton,WA,98056 Geraldine A. Cunningham,4100 N.E. 17th,Renton,WA,98056 Jolene Richmond,1709 Whitman Ave.N.E. ,Renton,WA,98056 Vicki Hulses, 1729 Whitman Ave. N.E. ,Renton,WA,98056 Doug Richmond, 1709 Whitman Ave. N.E. ,Renton,WA,98056 Don Westpha11,4109 N.E. 17th,Renton,WA,98056 Joan Westphal1,4109 N.E. 17th,Renton,WA,98056 Paul C. Wold,4132 N.E. 17th,Renton,WA,98056 Carolyn L. Wold,4132 N.E. 17th,Renton,WA,98056 Anthony A. Helt,1712 Whitman Ave. N.E. ,Renton,WA,98056 Linda S. Helt,1712 Whitman Ave. N.E. ,Renton,WA,98056 Steve Walker, 1913 Vashon Ct. N.E. ,Renton,WA,98056 Annette Walker, 1913 Vashon Ct. N.E. ,Renton,WA,98056 Janene R. Johnson,1908 Vashon Ct. N.E. ,Renton,WA,98056 _ Stephen H. Johnson, 1908 Vashon Ct. N.E. ,Renton,WA,98056 Louis E. Borges,4123 N.E. 19th,Renton,WA,98056 Virgil Hil1,4080 N.E. 19th,Renton,WA,98056 K. Evans,1710 Shelton Ave. N.E. ,Renton,WA,98056 Ronald Hedlin,1709 Shelton Ave. N.E. ,Renton,WA,98056 Bob E. Abernithy, 1609 Shelton Ave. N.E. ,Renton,WA,98056 George Credit, 1700 Union Ave. N.E. , Renton,WA,98056 Karen E. Zerby, 1807 Union Ave. N.E. ,Renton,WA, 98056 Riena Corznati,1813 Union Ave. N.E. ,Renton,WA,98056 Steve Greer,4205 N.E. 19th,Renton,WA, 98056 Frederick Hi11,4100 N.E. 19th St. ,Renton,WA, 98056 Carol Hi11, 4080 N.E. 19th St. ,Renton,WA,98056 Lyle K. Coblert,4603 N.E. 20th, Renton,WA,98056 Larry Kraft, 1911 Union Ave. N.E. ,Renton,WA,98056 Nancy Kraft, 1911 Union Ave. N.E. ,Renton,WA,98056 Shannon Bueno, 1907 Vashon Ct. N.E. ,Renton,WA,98056 Rick Cordiga, 1901 Vashon Ct. N.E. ,Renton,WA,98056 Joan Cordiga,1901 Vashon Ct. N.E. ,Renton,WA,98056 N.E.Cemper, 3910 N.E. 17th St. ,Renton,WA,98056 1 42,,BTATt 0� • 1‘/ . JERRY NEALN -,F' Interim Director 41Z 1889 a1 STATE OF WASHINGTON • DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE Region Four Office -- 16018 MITI Creek Boulevard, MIII Creek, WA 98012 -- (206) 775-1311 May 19, 1988 (7," r Cs;i:N t;rt%' • i._. .:: Mr:( C,U.'L)!NG/ZON$NO DEPT. Environmental Review Codmittee City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue S. Renton, Washington 98055 Re: R-015-88; CV-015-88; Shortplat 015-88; Good Shepherd Group Home; MDNS R-01'0-88; CV-010-88; Good Shepherd of Washington; MDNS Dear Sirs: The Department of Wildlife concurs with the determinations. We support the proposed conditions (mitigation) for these projects. Sincerely, WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE r71r7.2-11 ann Habitat Biologist TO:td cc: Habitat Management - Olympia CITY. OF RENTON • COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT RECEIVED MEMORANDUM • MAY 2 1 i o CITY OF FieNi ON HOUSING&HUMAN.RESOURCES • DATE: May 18, 1990 TO: May Cly • FROM: g • irector-- SUBJECT: esponse to-• ouncil Inquiry 0 Staff Contact: Joi Morris, Coordinator Housing & Human Services Division (2553) Question from Mr. Stredicke, "Has the City been assured that the issue of separation of church and state regarding Good Shepherd Group Home funding been resolved?". The answer is no. A letter ,(see attached copy) has been delivered to Mr. Ed Ball which seeks answers regarding not only the religious issues, but several other issues as well. Copies of_the letter have also been sent to HUD, King County, and Bellevue because they have similar concerns to ours. . • I am expecting a.response to the letter by the end of the month. Regardless of the response,., the Housing and Human Services Citizens •Advisory Committee has requested the opportunity to discuss the status of the projects with Mr. Ed Ball and other Good Shepherd of Washington board members. After that meeting, the Citizens Advisory Committee will either reaffirm their support of the projects, request more information or recommend withdrawal of support for the projects. . If you have any further questions you may contact John Morris at 235-2553. CITY OF RENTON 1011. -COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT • • Housing and Human Resources John Morris,'Coordinator May 1, 1990 Ed Ball, President ' ' Good.Shepherd of Washington •. 13817 171st Ave. NE • . Redmond, WA 98052 Dear Ed, As we have discussed, the City of Renton has questions related to the two group home projects your organization has been, and continues to be,•in the process of developing, in Renton. These questions are primarily programmatic in nature and are necessitated by recent changes in your leadership, and by the length of time that has transpired.since you were allocated project ' . , development funds. • I am suggesting the following process to address the questions, and resolve any issues that they raise. All significant questions will be put in writing in this letter. All of your answers should likewise be in writing, in a letter addressed.to me; I will review your responses and ask for clarifications as needed. A staff report will, be prepared for use by the Housing and Human Resources.Citizens Advisory Committee. The Committee has previously expressed a desire to discuss the group home projects with you, and your response to my letter will be an excellent • opportunity for that discussion to occur. Issue: Religion. . . Has your Board acted in an official capacity in agreeing to the following provisions? In addition to, and not in substitution for, other provisions of this'Agreement regarding the F provision of management services for Good Shepherd Home, the management agent: + 1. represents that it is, or maybe deemed to be, a religious or denominational institution or organization, or an organization operated for religious.purpoes which is supervised or controlled.by or in connection with a religious or denominational institution or , organization; • 2. agrees on behalf of itself, its employees, agents and subcontractors, that, in connection with such management services: • a. it Vyfll not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment on the basis of religion and will not limit employment or give preference.in employment to persons.on the basis of religion. • b, it will not discriminate against any person applying for residency on the basis of religion,and will not limit such residency or give preference to persons on the basis of religion; • • 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2553 Facsimile (206) 235-2513 Ed Ball May 1, 1990 ;,::•i` Page 2 r' ,.:. c, it will provide no religious instruction:or counselling, conduct no.religious , lytizin and.exert no;cother': +�; • worship•or, services;.:engage•;in�.;no:religious;Iprose 8;,;,; •. `v���>� t,•'' ' r=::.I i•ion.of 1suchl.management:tservices, and:;1;' ;,.; ' ' uence:.in:'the'. rov s :f a . religious infl p• .,,1 ,: !•::,.:.," i ,. � �il: Via. Idl L:.' •r�I'.'�'!'�I'r:'. \f�,!�., �.)•.. d. the facilities managed in.whole'or:in par�t�;under,'this Agreement':'shall;`contain no;.:''.I'..:,:; .:;:,;, • sectarian or religious symbols or decorations; except for those symbols or:. decorations posted by each resident in his or,.her immediate living area. , If the Board has officially acted on these provisions, Can you provide the City with a certified copy of the Board minutes documenting that action? . ' Based on the keynote address at the. Annual:Meeting;of,:Good;.Sliepherd Lutheran.Home of the West held March 17, 1990, contained in:Good Shepherd::Hab:;Bits, religion:plays a significant role in Good Shepherd.Group Homes. Can• you explain':.how,•the:.Board:was able to reconcile its religious role with HUD.and Block Grant requirements.that'severely reduce that role. Issue: Revisions of By-Laws Does Good Shepherd Lutheran Home of the West want to change the.existing.By-Laws of Good Shepherd of Washington? • If yes, could you please highlight the changes and provide..a .brief explanation of why the change is proposed, and what you anticipate•its effects will be..?. • ' ' . • Your application indicates that The.Board is composed.of localTeopl•e;'who•with::the help'Of•a' '`i°':'''-';:,.,. the sponsor, Good Shepherd Lutheran Home of the West, are'guiding:development."'•Local representation on the Board is vital from our perspective, • Please indicate how this element will continue to be incorporated into your organization. Issue: Service to Renton Residents Your original application for Block Grants funds stated in response to the question: "Does the proposed project target Renton as' its primary service area?" .that "Case management, Department of Developmental Disabilities makes all referrals'.to the•f'provider, in this case. Good: • : Shepherd. Although we don't have absolute control of who is accepted into the home, we will , do every thing within our power to ensure that' Renton residents will be given priority." Is this still an accurate statement of your intentions? •Explain. Issue: Day to Day Management of the Facility • In response to the question: . Indicate who:'on your.staff will.;:be:resporisible;for this .project,.and •' :•` alification." You: •provided the.following statement ; Once the,`home.;is;;:built;,:the.`;:':. ' � ,; list their qualification. the. • Habilitation Coord,inator'.will.be.in charge. :That person's qualifications are a,Master;s Degree in;,: a field related to''fie position requirements with a minimum:"of;'two•;years;'relevant;'experience.;i •. MR/DD field, or a Bachelor's Degree in the field related.to the,position.requirements with'a • Minimum of four years relevant experience in MR/DD.field." . Is this still an accurate statement of your intentions?' Explain. ' ' . .. . . . .. • • , .. ... „ .. •. . .• -• " • . . . • . ' . • ' . . . . .. ., • • • — — . • • • . Ed Ball . ' •. . . . . • . • " • • ...., . • • . , .....• • . May , 1990 1. • •• • • • • ••• ••• •••••••, ... - •• . 3 Page. . . . . .. .. . •.. . .. . . • ..• • . , .••„...._ .•... . , ... . . . ... .... . ..• • • . . ... .. . . .. . .. . • . ... ....., .. • .. •• • • . . . . ... .. . . . . . . . .... . . . . . .. • .. .. . . , "•••• „...„ .,... .• . ... .. .. ., . . ' - • • • . .. • . . .. • . . . . .:'••• • Issue . Client.Profile .; ,, • -. • • ••••' • • ' '• • •- • • - . .........-::•::.:,!.;.:.•••;.;..,„,;„,....,;,.. ..,.,..,..;„,„.......„.,,...._,,, ,,..,....... . .,,.........„...,.........„..,..,.....„.„.,,,., ,,......,.,,,,,..,,,,,,...., ......, . ...„ , •• " ,..,.. . • . .. . . . •••.. . . • •••• • ••• . ...• . •.:••••• • . • ':. • . Staff,-Council, and citizens WererePeatedly....tO14;theiliO*.e..s..;•would be be...for the syer!ly:•.......:,..:.,:•:‘,.. :‘.,:,.:„..,,,,:•.;.......,:::•.....,,;..;.„..,:i...:2.,..T.::::,.;...:,,,,,:,,,...,.. • -•:.' • .:'••developmentally disabled, . . -• • . . .. .., „ ... . .. . • , ..,.,...... .. . '.... ' ••• • I6.this..still the case? Explain, if necess'ary;:and•include your•working. ,.,..definition.ofitlie.,.rN/..,e.:r...!, ..::,,,..;.;......,,,,...;..,..7,...:•,.....,...,.,.;.,,,,...,..,...;,:.,,,•:.....,...).......„?...... . , •• '•,:•developmentally'disabled... '.-. •, . . • ... .. , • ••:. , .....,...,..:.:;::•;.•:•:.•;....•.: ...,„...... •••••••••,f.:.,..'....,:',:•;•:: ...• :•::::.,:"..,...:,•:•••':•:...‘.::,•:v/.!'i. ..u•.,:ci:.1,:•!.,.;:•;•!•,•,.•,,,.,..•: *...:••••'• ...,.....,• - . .•,.:••• •. . ... •• ••••.... ..... :• ..,....., •......,, .... -....,,, .. please•,:..... ,.... •-•:;... ..:•••••.:•.:„.,0',..taN.,-4..,.,,,,,,,,,,,,,q,,,,,,v,,,,• ....„....;.,,i.i.,:,:•.fi.,.....,.,,„ theseworking...,.....•••'...:',.. ..if*•rt,:s...,,,•:'..,7,..:1•.3..,..6f. ii110 i.,n..., .... . .i,v.itii...... ;11..•.,,,dii.:,ii6bi,....fiesfjos40t:::to.:;. .,.,..,q11. .p9. ..;,. :., .. ,,i!,; ..1 ?,::,,,...,,,,F,:i....,,,ii;i..;._4.:„.lui4.,,,lif.;:,;c..,...;,,,,,,..1,:;,,,,,,,,,,,,:,,.. ,',....':.;•:.•.,.• .....•...............„be of_ ...•any. ., ......,„_.•. . . .......,.....,•,.......•;.,......,.:,..,.....4, ,..,,.,,,,,;,.,..i,„...,,,,,,..,411,2,:,,,..6.,,,,,,,...,,:-.....,:....,:-...,..,..,,..-;,,,........ .,,fi,,,,i;•.,,,,,..,,,•i,,,,,,i,;1,,:1„:;,.,...,4c,,,.,,..,,,,::„;i,•i„,:i.,•4.,,•;,..-;,,...,.,$4.>;..k.i.i,.,,,,,,%..,x,i..,,,trivy..,,,i..2,:... ,: ,•!.,.,,,, ,..,..,,,...:,,..,..2...,1,.,,,;ii..,..;•:•.,::.i.-.2.:z..;,..,...„,,,,,i,,...,•.•-•;•,•,..:,:,,,,.,•..• ::•,;.,..-,:;;::::::, ,-„,::.:.:::•••••;.:.;•:',•:...:24:,!.-,P,...,;...,,,•.,....„:„,•,..,'•,.......,,,i,..:,,...ii.-:::,:y::,1•i'ci.v;'•,:;4.4:•,,,•'liPie:N!'40,L41$,i..a.T:'6-.)4444-.';1:.?,:te:t,t•-1,24',":: ',••0-.'i•T'AP.4,1,W)A4017:04;'N;re,..t4,11,1•Nt•- :::?,:. .i,i11:•':'•:;...i.!:"Aiirgft'A.I'Ari..!•••AY.94,1443."`.. ..',.::,..1.:-.••,-•.',.q;':.,..,,,••'•'S.'4,.,:'il,..f.',:',•:'•:,...',•••••••••••,,,-;•:,:s-v:';•.•,..,.....:•i!:.',..., ,.4.'•••,,,::','•i'Ar:-...);:.1g......,i4.3k*I.F,f.',.;,:;;.1,q0Aetifo,4piti.,,V;t?,::::'(,,,'):P;;,.,'Y..1-•:-:::;,•ik'ftc.:.'i..,:x. .:4','•*:::71...;_0•;i'D'i7?,';,'6;eit..',.,,I,';.1',',4,!•;,fg.1%;J',',..c..,.,,,,,o,!zil.r.,•;,eiip,,,,.1:4:t.kpiiik4,,,,,,,?6,;17,ve,, ,,,, ,,,,,:.,..,:::,:•,„,: i......-,:,0,.....,..,,,..fr;!,:,,,...••;;;;:, „..;: ,.! ........:,,.:,.:•, ..s.,:..,:•.:.,,.,::,:•..i,,,,:;....,;,.... ......,:,.,..cs,.....;; ;Y:,14*,4x,,V.ii.1.,,,zg:A'nfi. . .:Z'JA.P,VT:.:: :i',,,...cgk'gl.1.1t.?.!'•4i,,.:11.,':', ),V4V4'N'Lligt,,V10,KiZ., :,f1314446NL'6400.fig,t',014.:•;,,,:,: •.',...F:::,..,.,,. .* :1;.,:,,'...ic,A.. .,;.:ti.',..:c•ii..;:;i:;1,',ii'2',•:•,,..."V.i.:,?:-:•,;.. ..: q.".,:q;,:'.i.;:: : ',..i.•.:.,•..)::•.'•!Ri%,•?,,f,..,,A,1%; ••V:t.••••• .•k•O':',•1.1•it.,,tg4:',:;:.'fiY: ;:',;.:1:',V.,;t?';',114',,,,,ii'l...1,.i.,‘Al:',,ttliArolgi;t0?p,";;:q!!.•Y:•,•••• ',,,,..14., ,111,',4'..,0e,?.,;..1,5A.::(7.bilic,erely4,,,:•,,;:•••••,.:':,.z..;',.:; •;,:;,•!„.,,!,..-!,:';',',.-5,...-,:':?:.';',.'.,;:.' ''./... . ,.5'..'•.‘.:•,,.••••.:.-,....•,......,,.2...:`•:;, ,,',...`,1:•,..,::•Y;.:::•2.. ...,..,,,k•f,,,.•..p,::,),...ii..,.‘z.,3;,3, , ;i:,:•,,,,ii.:•;vi!A:S.ml'!, .!fi,.,.,P:ki,,tri!, :?..:,:0,40.,,II.7 .i,..7b.,4e....,V,,,!; :..; r, i.....•, i4.,T....•,P.1••ii• :;,-.;:i:,,••••....,,,:!;.2-•:-•••,.ii:,%-:•••T,.,:i.,,,.:•.,;-;',.,.v.:,:::••,.,,,, ,,,,,,,2:zi,,,,....,.,,,,,,,.....:,..::,.••::,,,,;....i:2,•:,,,,:s:•:,F,.f/....•',1;:f.'!;,..'''X'10.:;;:-Vi`.:!!!!..:411 ',!•iff,....:'0,1' "larl'a.....Y.V.%:::7"....::.,..2,4;f:;•.'.)Rit;g:IP.',:gf:0',:Klifr`,..?:*;',,VC":..i.7.i'V''.....'';,. ....,:sg:',.%.. ..),-'',:y,--'4,';-•.,6',"-..."'•1.," ;•.:..•••,....-..i:f,'".s.'••;,......:.."0.'.,,:ce';...",'....-:•,.•..'...,,•:;''.,,,Alr.,. .s.:•,'-':,:,.',.".i.l..;1,0.:::";,..!,:‘,:•,-..,,,,...!.:...,,,.;,.i,.?..!....,,,;,.,:....-......',..,,,, ...,..i4,....-,.',,i:c;.,„:..?,;.•.1•?..:..i.;;T.,,I.,....,•;,....;:,:,..,...,...,,..,it,,;;,..,,I;,4.,i..y,,,,;,.. .,:y..;;;,ix„,,,,,,,...,:i.,,c1,4.,;=4,,,:!,,..A.,,,,:,,p.,,,..F.,.,,- ,..--',...,r":;?"',•"•,-je'r'.•1'.."•;,' •.-,•.,)' ... ••••• ••• ' '.• .,--.4%.''.1-","-"•;-.'',.,r..-•,•'•:1`..i...:•;•.'•-.;•.••:I,.-:..;:?••, :Li••;••• ,,,•',,,--,••.'„...,•e..;',:;:„,•i.,:.•-`:::.:.%•-•.;4„.!, '.:,..-...:•,:',-;44-.P,,?•.,,,,I .7.C,::. :-1'.'•::`,...;‘;••••••••-..";.•„,,,.:;".:yr,11-..-44•••••!,&:•„".•,.;,,,-;3',44;;/•W:ill'i,,:::-;,,,,,,if.,,,f.,,e-.4',,...“...1 . ,. . .. „ • ,,. .. •• • " "—'".." -- • •• . . . .. . •:„. . . , , .,,. ....•... .. . ..•. ...• .., ••t,.. .. . •.:• .r ...,...,A.. . . .. ...,„ ..„.,.. . .„ ......., ....,1...,. , ....,,, . • . . '' ' • • ohn,Morris • • . . • .. ,.• ••• ., • . . . . . ••• .,. . •••• •• , . , • . •. . - •.. . . . .. . . • . . • •••• • ... . . • • • . .. . .. . . . .• . . . . . . ... . . . . . . •• , ..,...-.. .•• • ..• • • . . . , . , . . . . . . .. • . . . . • • , . • . • . • . ". " •• • • .. . „ •,•••.. . •.• ....,., ,•,. . . .. ., . . • .,. , . .;.... ... .. . ,.. , . ,.. ... . • • •• • •••••"• • .. ..• - . . . ...,......•••... •• .• .• . . . . • • . . . . •••- • •. - . • . • • . . • . • •• . •. • • • .. • . . •••—• . . . . . „ • ........:-.. .,. •:!•,..! ,.. . • . .. . • • .,••••••,,,,,,,,,"..',,N.,-,;-•••,:,,,,••'i.,`cr:i.,:ir:',:,s!...1..,.4...:=,.-,:‘,,,n...,,..,:l!r.....:1,2;:xer,:iN,:•4141-(1!-•..,:•,••.....,.:,,,,,,,....,• ........,•:,....%;;*,''..'...,";.,c.,:;.,.,• . ., , ... .. . 2 . ,....,,,::., ;•.•...,,..,,,,., ,.... . ., ..-..; ;,. ,„. ..•.' ..:•:..z. :••:,..c.:..,:;•;.s.:?-:1•..-,-.:":{':',: ,'10.,.•:: ;r. .4Sk..,q5.••d.,,..v...;•!.i.1:,.i.:'..:,.. j,":...,•.!•;:r..',,,.".,,,,•,-...Zr, Vi A.'.'''V-,•M•,.,--;`,4,..,,;;•,i:•,...''' 1.;•,......;- ::',;••1';':•••••,:••••::::•.,,-.•..'.''''...',.'.,•„.•-,•''-• ••• "' • •••••'......4.•;".;....''..' .. :•:•-..... ".......;• : ... ' .....,... .:...........:,.;, ..,.•. :•:. ...".••;....,',.•i..:„ ..;...j....'4.•:„. ,":•.!• .,',•.:.,,,;',...' •-,;,,'•,••,7:?,.:;•,;:: .5•-...'•::. ••••,,,)-Y,•:.•••1:',•• 14:-'1'4,R.,,:,4.41i.,',.e.C-A.,:i•;M',•?.3',.•:*,`,7i..1••V,'..... •• .:•:••. .. "'•"- ••• • • • "• "'•'.•' ''••....:••-• • "....,4•.'2, :•'...'''::,,,:•.: ;,.1. 24'A':...:...',' ,,,:;;•.=,!•!,...;;;;.:,',-..i;9'..,,-;Vic;•.;,..r.',i1,„..;;;.)/Aft';,,,4,,, ,,,,..f.,,?t,4k...-..:.'; ... , .,......,.. . . . .:. • . . M....:*:•';:,.,. :i!.,,.‘:....,:./::.;.:::•.-.....,,... , ... ..... .,,.. .. . .. . • • ' •• •' " . . . . • ' . . . . •• . : ' • . ' • . . .. . , .. . . Johnigoodshep . . - • . . .. . . . . . .. • • • : ,.......,,:_.••;:...-.....,;...,..:.....,......,.....;;;.... .„..,..4:?....,,•:....,..:,....,...:•.,...,. .P,a••••.„,..:•.::,.............:::,,,,,•:.:•,,,.:,..,;:2;...,..-.,:•",.,,::-,: "•-•- •••., - . . . . •. , • • . . ... . . •,.'••:.......,:.•...:':,:• •••••,,•••:.''',,,.;,•&••••.,!•,...;:•-••::•:-,..:,............".• •,.•..-..,•.....,••:: •••:,.::••.:i.: ,.-.......•:::...,.,. .,.....;,....:. . . . . •. . • . . . . ..• . . .. , . , • . • .. . . . . .• • . .• . . . . . P. . . . . . .. • i .,• • . • ., •... _• . • . . • .. . . .. .. •.- . . . . • • , 'N . • . . • . • •., • . • • .. ,, . • . . . . • . • • . . . . . . •• • • . . I . . . . • - . ., . .., •. . . . . . • ' • - , ••• - •• . . . .. .. , •. .. . , . . - .. . . . "• •• • •-•. .-." . • . :.. • . •• • •• , . . •• • . . . • . , . •: .• • . • • ' •••• '" , ;.•,--,..,.•.. ;;, , . ..:•.•."...• ,• .• ,'.• ••••••; ::.•••,.. :.,.,•;..••:.; c:.':.j...•''SY •:‘;•-••:••••1:.•6•!.....:• . . . . . . ' : ''''''';' :•:';. '.."•.:•::',...!:4— ''-Ci.. :-,"'1,"..:*::,..ily',::":,:/:..:::.“?!1. ,f•40;*i,'i:.;4W;•:•::.:, . •• • . ... ,.., . • . • •. . • - .•• - • • . ..• • • • . • :.•••••••••••• .......•'• - :•::•••'.•!..:'.••'-...'f:.':.-- '..."'•••• •.....:-.,..'7..,...';':•:•:::•• :.--'''..,k'V••-!;•-':• ••:::•.:••••••••:••••Ii:'"... : .. • .. . , . . . . • . - ,. ,... . .. • • . , . . ,.. . . , . „ . .. . . : . . . • ... • “— ' " .. • • . . . . • A • • . . . . . . , . . . . • • . . . . • • ,• . .. . . .. . • . ,• . .. . . . .. . . ' . . • • .. .. . . . • • ' . . . • . . Fancher/Caruso & Associates, Architects CITY OF RENTON May 18, 1988 WE•ve• a.. iiAYi91 Mr. Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator 0UILD!1.,IG/ZONINj LA.37. City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 Re: Good Shepherd Group Home South side of N.E. 19th Street at the 3900 block, between Union Avenue and Shelton Avenue N.E. Dear Mr. Erickson: The owners and John Caruso of Fancher/Caruso & Associates , Archi- tects , had a meeting with Mr. Jerry Lind on Monday, May 16th, and reviewed the mitigation items identified in your May 6th letter. Mr. Lind recommended that we submit a letter responding to the items and a revised Landscape Plan for review as soon as possible to avoid missing the deadline. Item 1 refers to siting the building and parking to conform the existing neighborhood characteristics as much as possible. The existing area is essentially undeveloped with the exception of a few lots . We have enclosed photographs of the area and we feel that the proposed design is appropriate for the site and consist- ent with residential site design in the neighborhood. Item 2 refers to revising the Landscape Plan. We will work with the City to achieve a landscape design acceptable to the City. Items 3 & 4 will be fully complied with. We will also increase the driveway to 20' as required by Mr. Clint Morgan at traffic engineering. The owner would like to add a deck or patio area, and plans to do so, when the owner raises the additional monies . This addition will most likely occur after occupancy. R. Michael Fancher AIA 13712 Park Lane • Kirkland, Washington 98033 • 206/822-9854 I? John Caruso AIA May 18, 1988 Mr. Donald K. Erickson, AICP Page 2 The building will be designed to meet or exceed UBC requirements for the R-1 occupancy classification. Sincerely, P. John Caruso, AIA Vice President PJC/mm enclosure cc : Mr. Ed Stanely, Owner Ms . Darlene Lang, Owner Mr. Carl Nueswanger, HUD Mr. John Henkle, Seattle Mortgage NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a Determination of NON-SIGNIFICANCE- MITIGATED for the following project(s) under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code. The Applicant(s) have completed a mitigation process pursuant to WAC 197-11-350. GOOD SHEPHERD GROUP HOME FOR THE DEVELOPMENTALLY DISABLED Proposal to: 1) rezone subject property from R-1 (Single Family Residential Use) to G-1 (General Use); 2) subdivide existing property into two lots; 3) develop a group home for six developmentally disabled adults (as a conditional use) on one of the new lots. The subject property is presently vacant. The surrounding property is zoned for single-family residential development, and the majority of the lots are developed. Property located on the 1000 block of Olympia Avenue N.E., on the west side of the street, north of N.E. 10th Court and south of N.E. 10th Place. ECF-015-88; R-015-88; CU-015-88, ShPI-015-88 \ICGOOD SHEPHERD GROUP HOME FOR THE DEVELOPMENTALLY DISABLED Proposal to rezone a .847 acre parcel from R-1 (Single Family Residential) zoning to G-1 (General Use) zoning and application for a conditional use permit to develop a six resident, six bedroom group home for the developmentally disabled on the subject site. The portion of the site planned for development is presently vacant; there is an existing house on the remaining property which will be retained. The area surrounding the site is zoned for single family residences and is generally so developed. Churches and other community service facilities are also in place in the area. Property located on the south side of N.E. 19th Street at the 3900 block, between Union Avenue and Shelton Avenue N.E. ECF-010-88; R-010-88; CU-010-88 RAINIER SAND & GRAVEL, INC., EDWARDS PIT Application for continuation Special Permit Approval for Fill and Grade Permit to allow the excavation of approximately 320,000 cubic yards of sand and grade from a 64 acre site. Grade improvements will be made in order to enhance the site. Property located approximately 700 feet south of N.E. Third Street and approximately 1,300 feet west of Monroe Avenue N.E. SP-012-88 CITY OF RENTON, PUBLIC WORKS, PRODUCTION WELL #10 & 11 Application for environmental review for a project that includes the drilling of two water production wells, two underground well head vaults, a water treatment building, and water mains within the Maplewood Golf Course. The project is located at the Maplewood Golf Course at 4000 Maple Valley Highway. ECF-022-88 FURTHER INFORMATION REGARDING THIS ACTION IS AVAILABLE IN THE BUILDING AND ZONING. DEPARTMENT, MUNICIPAL BUILDING, RENTON, WASHINGTON, 235-2550. ANY APPEAL OF ERC ACTION MUST BE FILED WITH THE CITY OF RENTON HEARING EXAMINER BY 5:00 p.m. JUNE 10, 1988. Published: May 27, 1988 S/0G7 1h.r.Yr . . p •� Flt /,•`yl'4;441 , ENVIRoNMENTAL DEcLARATioN APPLICATION NO. . ECF-010-88 , R-010-88, CU-010-88 APPLICANT GOOD SHEPHERD GROUP HOME FOR THE DEVELOPMENTALLY DISABLED ® $ �C 'Q PROPOSAL TO REZONE A . 847 ACRE PARCEL FORM R-1 PR t� u FIR RESIDENTIAL) ZONING TO G-1 (GENERAL USE) ZONING AND APPLICATION FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO DEVELOP A SIX RESIDENT, SIX BEDROOM GROUP HOME FOR THE DEVELOPMENTALLY DISABLED ON THE SUBJECT SITE. THE PORTION OF THE SITE PLANNED FOR DEVELOPMENT IS PRESENTLY VA- GENERAL LOCATION AND/OR ADDRESS CANT; THERE IS AN EXISTING LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF N.E . HOUSE ON THE REMAINING PROPER: 19th ST. AT THE 3900 BLOCK, BETWEEN UNION WHICH WILL BE RETAINED. AVENUE AND SHELTON AVENUE N.E. THE AREA SURROUNDING THI SITE IS ZONED FOR SINGLI POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS FENCILY ES RESI- AND I OF AN . ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION. • • GENERALLY SO DEVELOPEI CHURCHES AND OTHER COM- MUNITY SERVICE FACILITIE ARE ALSO IN PLACE IN THE THE CITY OF. RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COTTEE (E.R.C.) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT WILL . > WILL NOT BE REQUIRED. THE CITY OF RENTON WILL NOT ACT ON THIS PROPOSAL FOR 1.5 DAYS FROM THE DATE BELOW. COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY AN APPEAL OF THE ABOVE DETERMINATION MAY BE FILED WITH. THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER BY 5:00 P.M., JUNE 10, . 1988 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT AT 235-2550. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION. / i31.i iLLa Y 11 Vi vaaa .W Via ✓- a�a.r S--.- JN _ On the 13 day of , 1988, I deposited in the mail of the United States a sealed envelo a containing eieC documents. This information was sent to: • NAME: Mary Lou Harbeck,3507 N.E. llth,Renton,WA,98056 Good Shepherd of Washington, 18940 Marine View Dr. S.W. ,Seattle,WA,98166 Darlene Lang,4751 South 172nd Place,Seattle,WA,98166 Howard R. Kienle,732 Melody Lane,Enumclaw,WA,98022 Mary L. Czaplinski,1801 Union Ave. N.E. ,Renton,WA,98056 Carla Ba11, 1800 Union Ave. N.E. ,Renton,WA,98056 Judith W. Sheldon,1813 Union Ave. N.E. ,Renton,WA,98056 Owen K. Ha11,1732 Union Ave. , Renton,WA,98056. Tom Czaplinski,1801 Union Ave. N.E. ,Renton,WA,98056 E.Bueno,1907 Vashon Ct. N.E. ,Renton,WA,98056 Katherine L. Hawley, 1717 Union Ave. N.E. ,Renton,WA,98056 Timothy N. Potter,1892 Shelton Ave. N.E. ,Renton,WA,98056 Jennifer L. Potter,1892 Shelton Ave. N.E. ,Renton,WA,98056 Scott L. .Surber,3839 N.E. 19th St. ,Renton,WA,98056 Annelle J. Abernithy,1609 Shelton Ave. N.E. ,Renton,WA,98056 Steve Altrinzer,1703 Shelton Ave. N.E. ,Renton,WA,98056 Cindy Altrinzer,.1703 Shelton Ave. N.E. ,Renton,WA,98056 Shirley F. Peterson, 1808 Union Ave. N.E. ,Renton,WA,98056 Jeff Crawford,1724 Union Ave. N.E. ,Renton,WA,98056 N. L. James,1724 Union Ave. N.E. ,Renton,WA,98056 Patricia Wallace,4205 N.E. 19th,Renton,WA,98056 I. Watkins,4211 N.E. 19th,Renton,WA,98056 Ada Jean Hi11,4100 N.E. 19th,Renton,WA,98056 Kim Tessin,4203 N.E. 19th,Renton,WA,98056 Floyd Figgins,4225 N.E. 19th,Renton,WA,98056 Geraldine A. Cunningham,4100 N.E. 17th,Renton,WA,98056 Jolene Richmond,1709 Whitman Ave.N.E. ,Renton,WA,98056 Vicki Hulses, 1729 Whitman Ave. N.E. ,Renton,WA,98056 Doug Richmond,1709 Whitman Ave. N.E. ,Renton,WA,98056 Don Westpha11,4109 N.E. 17th,Renton,WA,98056 Joan Westpha11,4109 N.E. 17th,Renton,WA,98056 Paul C. Wold,4132 N.E. 17th,Renton,WA,98056. Carolyn L. Wold,4132 N.E. 17th,Renton,WA,98056 Anthony A. Helt,1712 Whitman Ave. N.E. ,Renton,WA,98056 Linda S. Helt,1712 Whitman Ave. N.E. ,Renton,WA, 98056 Steve Walker,1913 Vashon Ct. N.E. ,Renton,WA,98056 Annette Walker,1913 Vashon Ct. N.E. ,Renton,WA,98056 Janene R. Johnson,1908 Vashon Ct. N.E. ,Renton,WA,98056 Stephen H. Johnson, 1908 Vashon Ct. N.E. ,Renton,WA,98056 Louis E. Borges,4123 N.E. 19th,Renton,WA,98056 Virgil Hi11,4080 N.E. 19th,Renton,WA,98056 K. Evans, 1710 Shelton Ave. N.E. ,Renton,WA,98056 Ronald Hedlin, 1709 Shelton Ave. N.E. ,Renton,WA,98056 Bob E. Abernithy, 1609 Shelton Ave. N.E. ,Renton,WA, 98056 George Credit, 1700 Union Ave. N.E. , Renton,WA,98056 Karen E. Zerby, 1807 Union Ave. N.E. ,Renton,WA,98056 Riena Corznati, 1813 Union Ave. N.E. ,Renton,WA,98056 Steve Greer,4205 N.E. 19th,Renton,WA,98056 Frederick Hi11,4100 N.E. 19th St. ,Renton,WA,98056 Carol Hi11, 4080 N.E. 19th St. ,Renton,WA,98056 Lyle K. Coblert,4603 N.E. 20th, Renton,WA,98056 Larry Kraft, 1911 Union Ave. N.E. ,Renton,WA,98056 A Nancy Kraft, 1911 Union Ave. N.E. ,Renton,WA,98056 Shannon Bueno,1907 Vashon Ct. N.E. ,Renton,WA,98056 Rick Cordiga, 1901 Vashon Ct. N.E. ,Renton,WA,98056 Joan Cordiga, 1901 Vashon Ct. N.E. ,Renton,WA, 98056 N.E.Cemper,3910 N.E. 17th St. ,Renton,WA, 98056 SIGNED BY: aQ,c��e.,_4 J SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this )&p t� day of M , 1988. lo/' C:............. 1C •4 °IMO tP• A at02-evla-gn ‘G o•z� Notary Public in and for the State of PUBL �Q,:�01 Washington, ���11/' %PO. R, � ��� residing at (--RSAII;In TF OF'WNSv, 1" therein. Project Name and Number: Good Shepherd of Washington ECF-010-88; R-010-88; CU-010-88 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING On the /0 day of 772 , 1988, I deposited in the mail of the United Stat s a sealed envelope containing D rls_rn 9- 0,,,,,,fos.aziA, documents. This information was sent to: NAME: C""u q 02- 73 REPRESENTING: Darlene Lang 4751 South 172nd Place Seattle, WA 98166 SIGNED BY: 4tetp-ete-e. SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this /d 7j day of , 1988. f M '•.��Z P U B `�C,�o►o,,� Notar Public in an for the State of `4 '•^9(�� R ti°� • ~ 1► Washington, i.'•••....•SA\C�o• residing at 4. � ��OF V+IA�,fi therein. �...��' Project Name and Number: Good Shepherd of Washington ECF-010-88; R-010-88;. CU-010-88 cF -o/.-0 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING On the ' Y4 day of , 1988, I deposited in the mails of the United States a sealed envelope containing # S 9 . documents. This information was sent to: NAME: O S rn`4 REPRESENTING: DICA.A. 4.1(.. 1 y___AVJU4444.ia a-d i ° SIGNED BY: Auidersi_teLtatAdag SUBS —.AND SWORN to before me this 9 _ day of 01 •. 1988 . ' 0 �4 Y 0140 ,`'' PU6L �:o Notar Public in and for the State of Washington, k. ..°i;�� �1 residing at Raw ,p,0 , therein. Proj e d"and Number: 4 [, / 44, 6 1p • �C�'- D/S.�p t•ege.G-O/O-dry) 4► 4hawuF_ CCP • p/L-al PamC9ekr_FLC,- Ecf- ozs-RE et* A o2-81 &at.. ta.c di pem.A. - ZCf-67- R Or. _..,._ �- • 1.] _ 141 ..t .,. ,1 - r•is Cr C. CITY OF RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT Ronald G. Nelson, Director Earl Clymer, Mayor May 9, 1988 Washington State Department of Ecology Environmental Review Section Mail Stop PV-11 Olympia, WA 98504 • RE: Environmental Determinations Transmitted herewith are copies of Environmental Determinations issued on May 9, 1988: ' DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED Good Shepherd Group Home for the Developmentally Disabled (ECF-015-88; R-015-88; CU-015-88, ShPI-015-88) .Good Shepherd Group Home for the Developmentally Disabled / (ECF-010-88; R-010-88; CU-010-88) Rainier Sand & Gravel (ECF-012-88; SP-012-88) City of Renton - Public Works Department/Production Wells #10 & 11 (ECF-022-88) DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE Paul Bulgarelli (ECF-025-88; R-25-88; Sh P1 108-87; V 109-87; W 110-87) City of Renton-Parks Department/Gene Coulon Log Boom Maintenance (ECF-023-88; SM-023-88) ,. __.._ n- UVneh;natnn 95n55 - (2061 235-2540 Environmental Determinations May 9, 1988 • Page 2 City of Renton - Parks and Recreation Department/Kennydale Beach Park Sidewalk (ECF-024-88; SM 024-88) The fifteen (15) day comment period for these projects will end on May 23, 1988. Following the end of the comment period, the City will finalize it's Determination unless comments received require a reevaluation. Following the finalization of the Determination, there is a required 14 day appeal period. • If you have questions, please call Jeanette Samek-McKague or me at 235-2550. Sincerely, Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator pc: Mr. Gerald W. Marbett Mr. Gregory M. Bush Department of Wildlife Mr. Joe Robels agencylt t Public Notice . Public Notice NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL '° roe Avenue N.E.(ECF-012-88;SP-012-88) DETEMINATION . CITY OF RENTON - PUBLIC ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE DEPARTMENT/PRODUCTION WELLSRKS#10 RENTON,WASHINGTON , &11 The Environmental Review Committee.. Application for environmental review for a (ERC)has issued a Determination of NON project that includes the drilling of two SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED for the follow- water production wells, two underground ing project(s) under the authority of the well head vaults, and water mains within Renton Municipal Code. The Applicant(s) the Maplewood Golf Course. A water treat- AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLI( ahnatv eto c WAC e9d.1a 1m-3i5tiga.tion process pursu- lmioenn.t Thueil dpinrg jeisc tp lias nlnoecda tfeodr future e inMsataplllea- GOOD SHEPHERD GROUP HOME wood Golf Course at: 4000 Maple Valley FOR THE DEVELOPMENTALLY DISA- Highway.(ECF-022-88) Audrey Benner ,being first du BLED • This decision will be finalized in 15 days. that he/she is the Chief Clerk of the Application to: 1) rezone subject property Written comments received after 5:00 p.m. from R-1 (Single Family Residential Use)to May 24, 1988, will not be considered. A G-1 (General Use); 2)A subdivide existing fourteen (14) day appeal period will com- property Into two lots; 3)A conditional use mence following the finalization of DNS. VALLEY DAILY N. o ppermitmentall to y allodisw aabled groupadults homeon forone of six Bevel-the TheCity mitigation ofRentonm'seasuresEnvironmental imposed byReview the • Kent Edition • Renton Edition • A new lots. Located on the 1000 block of Committee are available at the Building Olympia Avenue N.E., on the west side of and Zoning Department, Municipal Build- thenewspapers six 6 times a week, street, north of N.E. 10th Court and ing,Renton,Washington.Phone 235-2550. , Dailypublished ( ) south of N.E. 10th Place. (ECF-015-88;,:'_Published May 9,'1988 Valley Daily News are legal newspapers and are now and have b( R-015-88;CU-015-88,ShPI-015-88) R5045 Acct.#51067 months prior to the date of publication referred to GOOD SHEPHERD GROUP HOME --- FOR THE DEVELOPMENTALLY DISA- i n the English language continually as daily new BLED County,Washington.The Valley Daily News has � Application to rezone a .847 acre parcel b newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the S from R-1 (Single Family Residential)zoning to G-1 (General Use) zoning and applica- ' King County. tion for a conditional use permit to develop a six resident,.six bedroom group home for the developmentally disabled on the sub- The notice in the exact form attached,was publisl ject site. Property Is located on the south • Renton Edition X , Auburn Editio side of N.E. 19th Street at the 3900 block, ' Ave- supplement form) which was regularly distribu nue N.E. (ECF-010-88; R-01 88ebetween Union Avenue and Sh1ton CU-010-•' during the below stated period.The annexed notic( 88) KBI DIVERSIFIED, LTD., THE RENTON P LID 1 i r No ti cr. RIDGE APARTMENTS Applications to rezone 1.4 acres of property , was published on May 9 , 1988 R5( from R-1 Residential single-family toR- residential multi-family and for site plan • approval to allow a 108 unit apartment complex on a 5.74 acre property(1.4 acres site combined with 4.34 acre parcel zoned • The full amount of the fee charged for said foreg R-4,,residential multiple family. Property is located on the west side of Aberdeen Ave- ' sum of $ 69 .9 2 . nue N.E., between 973-1021 Aberdeen Avenue N.E. (ECF-005-88; R-005-88; SA- 005-88) DENNIS T.SU PARK AVE.DELI&PUB 1 -� Application for a Conditional Use Permit to allow a parking lot for 24 vehicles to be located on a lot zoned R-4 (High Density Multi-Family Residential Use). The parking Subscribed and sworn to before a this 1 t ha 3,, rvqa y restaurantlotwillto and se tavernea locatednew270o directlsu re foot y to the north of the subject property. Located at 526-532 Pelly Avenue North (on the east • side), between North 5th Street and North 6th Street.(ECF 006-88;CU 006-88) RAINIER SAND&GRAVEL - 'Application for a special permit for a fill and grade permit to allow the continued opera- Nota Public for the S tion to include the excavation of approxi- matelyresiding at Fe( 320,000 cubic yards of material and the filling of the Borrow Pit with approxi- King County, V mately 1,100,000 cubic yards of material — VON#87 Revised 111e6 on a 64 acre site.Property located approxi mately 700 feet south of N.E. 3rd Stree and approximately 1,300 feet west of Mon CITY CF �FP1TOf l PECrv°1/7. 1, JUN ? n 1988 BU!LD1NG/zofljWG DEPT. i t &lole6D NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTON • The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a Determination of NON-SIGNIFICANCE- MITIGATED for the following project(s) under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code. The Applicant(s) have completed a mitigation process pursuant to WAC 197-11-350. Good Shepherd Group Home for the Developmentally Disabled Application to: 1) rezone subject property from R-I-(Single Family Residential Use) to G-1 (General Use); 2) A subdivide existing property into two lots; 3) A conditional use permit to allow a group home for six developmentally disabled adults on one of the new lots. Located on the 1000 block of Olympia Avenue N.E., on the west side of the street, north of N.E. 10th Court and south of N.E. 10th Place. (ECF-015-88; R-015-88; CU-015-88, ShPI-015-88) Good Shepherd Group Home for the Developmentally Disabled Application to rezone a .847 acre parcel from R-1 (Single Family Residential) zoning to G-1 (General Use) zoning and application for a conditional use permit to develop a six resident, six bedroom group home for the developmentally disabled on the subject site. Property is located on the south side of N.E. 19th Street • at the 3900 block, between Union Avenue and Shelton Avenue N.E. (ECF-010-88; R-010-88; CU-010-88) KBI Diyersified, Ltd., The Renton Ridge Apartments Applications to rezone 1.4 acres of property from R=1 Residential single-family to R-3 residential multi- family and for site plan approval to allow a 108 unit apartment complex on a 5.74 acre property (1.4 acres site combined with 4.34 acre parcel zoned R-4, residential multiple family). Property is located on the west side of Aberdeen Avenue N.E., between 973-1021 Aberdeen Avenue N.E. (ECF-005-88; R-005-88; SA- 005-88) Dennis T. Su Park Ave. Deli & Pub Application for a Conditional Use Permit to allow a parking lot for 24 vehicles to l e located on a lot zoned R-4 (High Density Multi-Family Residential Use). The parking lot will to serve a new 2700 square foot restaurant and tavern'located directly to the north of the subject property. Located at 526-532 Pelly Avenue North (on the east side), between North 5th Street and North 6th Street. (ECF 006-88; CU 006- 88) Rainier Sand & Gravel Application for a special permit for a fill and grade permit to allow the continued operation to include the excavation of approximately 320,000 cubic yards of material and the filling 'of the Borrow Pit with approximately 1,100,000 cubic yards of material on a 64 acre site. Property located approximately 700 feet south of N.E. 3rd Street and approximately 1,300 feet west of Monroe Avenue N.E. (ECF-012-88; SP-012- 88)' City of Renton - Public Works Department/Production Wells #10 & 11 Application for environmental review for a project that includes the drilling of two water production wells, two underground well head vaults, and water mains within the Maplewood Golf Course. A water treatment building is planned for future installation. The project is located at the Maplewood Golf Course at: 4000 Maple Valley Highway. (ECF-022-88) This decision will be finalized in 15 days.: Written comments received after 5:00 p.m. May 24, 1988, will not be considered. A fourteen (14) day appeal period will commence following the finalization of DNS. The mitigation measures imposed by the City of Renton's Environmental Review Committee are available at the Building and Zoning Department, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington. Phone 235-2550. Published: May 9, 1988 ' 140TICE ENVIRONMENTAL DEcLARATION • • APPLICATION NO. ECF-010-88, R-•010-88, CU-010-88 APPLICANT GOOD SHEPHERD GROUP HOME FOR THE DEVELOPMENTALLY DISABLED PROPOSED ACTION APPLICATION .TO REZONE. A .847 ACRES PARCEL FROM R-1 (SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL) ZONING TO G-1 (GENERAL USE) ZOING AND APPLICATION FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO DECELOP A SIX RESIDENT, SIX BEDROOM GROUP HOME FOR THE DEVELOPMENTALLY DISABLED ON THE SUBJECT SITE. GENERAL LOCATION AND/OR ADDRESS LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF N.E. 19th STREET AT THE 3900 BLOCK, BETWEEN UNION AVENUE AND SHELTON `/AVENUE N.E. POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (E.R.C.) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES Iftt DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT 1 I WILL XWILL NOT BE REQUIRED. THE CITY OF RENTON WILL' NOT ACT ON THIS PROPOSAL FOR 1.5 DAYS FROM THE DATE BELOW. COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY MAY 24, 1988 AN APPEAL OF THE ABOVE DETERMINATION MAY BE FILED WITH THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER BY 5:00 P.M., FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT AT 235-2550. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION. ORIGINAL CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST NO.: ECF-010-88 APPLICATION NO(S).: R-010-88; CU-010-88 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Proposal to rezone a .847 acre parcel from R-1 (Single Family Residential) zoning to G-1 (General Use) zoning and application for a conditional use permit to develop a six resident, six bedroom group home for the developmentally disabled on the subject site. The portion of the site planned for development is presently • vacant; there is an existing house on the remaining property which will be retained. The area surrounding the site is zoned for single family residences and is generally so developed. Churches and other community service facilities are also in place in the area. PROPONENT: Good Shepherd of Washington LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: The south side of N.E. 19th Street at the 3900 block, between Union Avenue and Shelton Avenue N.E. LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton, Building and Zoning Department. The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of an expanded environmental checklist and preliminary site plan, on file with the lead agency. Conditions were imposed as mitigation measures by the Environmental Review Committee under their authority of Section 4-2822(D) Renton Municipal Code (see attached sheet). These conditions are necessary to mitigate environmental impacts identified during the environmental review process. This DNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340. The lead agency will not act on this proposal for fifteen (15) days from May 9, 1988. Any interested party may submit written comments which must be submitted by 5:00 p.m., May 24, 1988, in order to be considered. A fourteen (14) day appeal period will commence following the finalization of the DNS. Responsible Official: Environmental Review Committee City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055 Phone: 235-2500 DATE OF DECISION: May 4, 1988, EFFECTIVE DATE: May 9, 1988 • „, R nald G. Nelson i . 1'" , ger Building and Zoning Director Po icy Deve . ment Di tor Richard C. ughton Public Works Director • sigltr ORIGHtL DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE MITIGATION MEASURES ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST NO.: ECF-010-88 APPLICATION,NO(S).: R-010-88; CU-010-88 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Proposal to rezone a .847 acre parcel from R-1 (Single Family Residential) zoning to G-1 (General Use) zoning and application for a conditional use permit to develop a six resident, six bedroom group home for the developmentally disabled on the subject site. The portion of the site planned for development is presently vacant; there is an existing house on the remaining property which will be retained. The area surrounding the site is zoned for single family residences and is generally so developed. Churches and other community service facilities are also in place in the area. PROPONENT: Good Shepherd of Washington LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: The south side of N.E. 19th Street at the 3900 block, between Union Avenue and Shelton Avenue N.E. CONDITIONS: 1. The applicant shall design and site the facility, including parking and ingress/egress routes, to be similar in style and placement on the lot to neighborhood residences. 2. The applicant shall work with the City to develop revised landscaping plans incorporating a greater number of plantings and larger shrubs and trees in order to enhance the property and to provide better separation between the site and neighboring properties, for the purpose of minimizing visual impacts, noise impacts and light and glare impacts from this development. 3. The applicant shall work with the City to develop a plan for approved hours of operation, erosion control, drainage management, and cleaning of construction equipment while the home is being constructed, in order to protect the integrity of the development site and the adjoining neighborhood. 4. That the applicant provide the City with a $1,000.00 revolving cash bond to ensure that the roadway is kept clean of dirt and debris. NOTE TO APPLICANT: A. The applicant needs to have a 20 foot wide driveway. B. Additionally, it is suggested that this facility be designed to incorporate additional amenities for the residents (e.g. a patio or deck with southern exposure, a greater variety of plantings to supplement the planned lawn area). C. That the applicant meet all requirements set by the Uniform Building Code for the construction of the group home facility. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA May 4, 1988 Third Floor Conference Room Commencing at 10:00 a.m. CONTINUED PROJECTS: Good Shepherd Group Home for the Developmentally Disabled Proposal to: 1) rezone subject property from R-1 (Single Family Residential Use) to G-1 (General Use); 2) subdivide existing property into two lots; 3) develop a group home for six developmentally disabled adults (as a conditional use) on one of the new lots. The subject property is presently vacant. The surrounding property is zoned for single-family residential development, and the majority of the lots are developed. Located on the 1000 block of Olympia Avenue N.E., on the west side of the street, north of N.E. 10th Court and south of N.E. 10th Place. (ECF-015-88; R-015-88; CU-015-88, ShPI-015-88) Good Shepherd Group Home for the Developmentally Disabled Proposal to rezone a .847 acre parcel from R-1 (Single Family Residential) zoning to G-1 (General Use) zoning and application for a conditional use permit to develop a six resident, six bedroom group home for the developmentally disabled on the subject site. The portion of the site planned for development is presently vacant; there is an existing house on the remaining property which will be retained. The area surrounding the site is zoned for single family residences and is generally so developed. Churches and other community service facilities are also in place in the area. Property is located on the south side of N.E. 19th Street at the 3900 block, between Union Avenue and Shelton Avenue N.E. (ECF-010-88; R-010-88; CU-010-88) NEW PROJECTS: Dennis T. Su Park Ave. Deli & Pub Application for a Conditional Use Permit to allow a parking lot for 24 vehicles to be located on a lot zoned R-4 (High Density Multi-Family Residential Use). This parking lot is intended to serve a new 2700 square foot restaurant and tavern to be located directly to the north of the subject property. The restaurant/tavern and ten additional parking spaces are proposed to be developed on two lots. These two lots are currently zoned B-1 (Commercial Use). Located at 526-532 Pelly Avenue North (on the east side), between North 5th Street and North 6th Street. (ECF 006-88; CU 006-88) Rainier Sand & Gravel Application for a special permit for a fill and grade permit to allow the continued operation to include the excavation of approximately 320,000 cubic yards of material and the filling of the Borrow Pit with approximately 1,100,000 cubic yards of material on a 64 acre site. Property located approximately 700 feet south of N.E. 3rd Street and approximately 1,300 feet west of Monroe Avenue N.E. (ECF-012-88; SP-012-88) Paul Bulgarelli Application for: 1) rezone of approximately 0.89 acres of property from G-1 (General Use) to R-1 (Single Family Residential); 2) subdivision of said property into two (2) lots; 3) a variance to allow one pipe-stem lot; and 4) waiver of required off-site improvements. The project is located west of Smithers Avenue South, west of Talbot Road South and south of I-405 at: 1314 Smithers Avenue South. (ECF-025-88; R-25-88; Sh P1 108-87; V 109-87; W 110-87) City of Renton-Parks Department/Gene Coulon Log Boom Maintenance Install treated pilings to replace existing tie-down cables to the log boom. Currently the log boom is held in place with steel cables and concrete anchors. The rusting of the cables and connections are presenting a continuous maintenance problem, and endangering public and private property. Property located at Gene Coulon Memorial Beach Park. (ECF-023-88; SM- 023-88) City of Renton - Parks and Recreation Department/Kennydale Beach Park Sidewalk Construction of a concrete sidewalk from the entrance of Kennydale Park to provide access to and around the comfort station. The sidewalk with be eight (8) feet wide, by 150 feet long, and will include a six (6) foot walkway on three (3) sides of the comfort station. Property located at Kennydale Beach Park at Lake Washington Boulevard North and North 36th Street. (ECF-024- 88; SM 024-88) City of Renton Public Works Department/Production Wells #10 & 11 Application for environmental review for a project that includes the drilling of two water production wells, two underground well head vaults, and water mains within the Maplewood Golf Course. A water treatment building is planned for future installation. The project is located at the Maplewood Golf Course at: 4000 Maple Valley Highway. (ECF-022-88) BUILDING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE STAFF REPORT May 4, 1988 A. BACKGROUND: APPLICANT: Good Shepherd of Washington PROJECT: Good Shepherd Group Home for the Developmentally Disabled ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST: (ECF-010-88 ; R-010-88 ; CU-010-88) DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Proposal to rezone a .847 acre parcel from R-1 (Single Family' Residential) zoning to G-1 (General Use) zoning and application for a conditional use permit to develop a six resident, six bedroom group home for the developmentally disabled on the subject site. The portion of the site planned for . development is presently vacant; there is an existing house on the remaining property which will be retained. The area surrounding the site is zoned for single family residences and is generally so developed. Churches and other community service facilities are also in place in the area. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: The south side of N.E. 19th Street at the 3900 block„, between Union Avenue and Shelton Avenue N.E. 4-- -- , 4- • aim j- • - -- — - - i5 tP s t > � � 1�: tt t+ �� tt eei,•1•i. • i11I1 ,c.L7 ,02 N1, aeo ^]bS 239 Q 20� G— 1. /�JO/ t� ' 30! ›l,l..•a 43 ® ' '740 20! / �'3 1 N 20le 57 202 / Eat • s C !".1— Z ,oho t' j°$'$I t'p ' 1'2 31 '4 701 / , \ j LL.LL �a - _ 1 0 g l 55 I 1 «a e5 9 4e 3t . I , t i l/i l►13C7 GOuNi TT ' 1 1 , - 1 1 t e "� 2 0,•r' 2_ i V. I. is 4 v. •I i E lA • I to - _... s.�q�i� ���� 85 27 :e cpwy�( •�. '+.' .; �,, ' 1111 J1 • � Fr/.5 1O H 8_3 Ez WmlWWW1� °�:►S :t t. " j1�6i.s �`/ — t a a 29 III I 2 3 4 S C. 1 5,9101112 it 14 K 16 ill. 1 I a ^ 1 I o R-2 ( .,� I 1 I J=� 01.— 1 -L ���..//--- t ' I R-3 B_ �-- 1 �� R 3 1 �; 1, I 1 • e� ti . . B 1 'Vs . R-2 I W , I 1 :: - =t =J-`Z • L 3-7-- .K..;11F- % i . � ,y_....,__________ OP e S. S . % 'Building and Zoni Good Shepherd of ahington May 4, 1988 Page 2 B. ISSUES: 1. Whether additional action is planned for the site at a future point? The size and configuration of this property is such that there is sufficient land for additional sub-division, rezoning and development. No proposals for these actions are described in this application form, however, it would be useful to have information concerning potential future plans for this property in order to provide a complete evaluation of the present application. 2 . Whether the design and placement of the proposed group home on the property is appropriate to the location of the site and consistent with other developments in the neighborhood? The group home has been designed to reflect the single-family residential character of the neighborhood. The proposed single-story structure is consistent with family homes in the vicinity. The proposed lot size of approximately 35, 000 square feet required for the G-1 zone differs from the minimum lot size of 7200 required for the R-1 in this vicinity. The larger lot size does distinguish this lot from neighboring lots; this characteristic can and should be utilized to provide an opportunity to locate the proposed residence on the lot in a way which would make it look similar to other area homes, while accommodating parking and other institutional facilities (e.g. wheel-chair ramps) at the rear of the home to minimize the impacts of the project on the neighborhood. , Required ingress/egress routes, parking facilities and exterior lighting should be located to provide for safe, efficient operation of the home and to limit such impacts as noise, light and glare, and visual interruptions upon the neighborhood. 3 . Whether adequate accommodations have been made to address ,anticipated vehicle and pedestrian traffic for this site? Vehicle traffic to the site will be confined to daily trips made by four employees and occasional trips by service personnel (e.g. delivery vans, medical personnel) . The group home residents will not drive vehicles. They will leave the facility as passengers in staff vehicles, or as pedestrians (accompanied by staff as necessary) . The number and types of trips to and from the site are characteristic of those made in the surrounding residential neighborhood and are anticipated to cause no significant impact on the area. ' •Building and Zoni - Good Shepherd of shington May 4, 1988 Page 3 4 . Whether sufficient landscaping, screenings and related amenities, have been provided to enhance the ,subject site and to buffer it from neighboring properties? It is recommended that larger shrubs and trees be utilized, together with fencing around the site, to enhance the property and to provide better separation between the site and neighboring properties. This type of screening will preserve visual homogeneity between this site and adjacent single-family residences and will minimize impacts from noise, light and glare. Further, it is suggested that this facility be designed to incorporate additional amenities (e.g. ramps, outside lighting, patio or deck with southern exposure, a greater variety of plantings to supplement the planned lawn area) to be designed in a way which accommodates the residents without disruption to the character of the surrounding single-family residential neighborhood. C. RECOMMENDATIONS: It is recommended that the ERC issue a Determination of Non-Significance - Mitigated - with the following conditions: 1. The applicant shall design and site the facility, including parking and ingress/egress routes, to be similar in style and placement on the lot to neighborhood residences. 2 . The applicant shall provide revised landscaping plans incorporating a greater number of plantings and larger shrubs and trees in order to enhance the property and to provide better separation between the site and neighboring properties, for the purpose of minimizing visual impacts, noise impacts and light and glare impacts from this development. 3 . The applicant shall work with the City to develop a plan for approved hours of operation, erosion control, drainage management, and cleaning of construction equipment while the home is being constructed, in order to protect the integrity of the development site and the adjoining neighborhood. 4 . That the applicant provide the City with a $2000 . 00 revolving cash bond to ensure that the roadway is kept clean of dirt and debris. NOTE TO APPLICANT: 1. The applicant needs to have a 20 foot wide driveway. 'Building and Zonir-. Good Shepherd of -hington May 4, 1988 Page 4 2 . Additionally, it is suggested that this facility be designed to incorporate additional amenities for the residents (e.g. a patio or deck with southern exposure, a greater variety of plantings to supplement the planned lawn area) . 3 . That the applicant meet all requirements set by the Uniform Building Code for the construction of the group home facility. D. COMMENTS OF REVIEWING DEPARTMENTS: Various City departments have reviewed and commented upon the project. These comments are as follows: POLICE DEPARTMENT: Environmental: No adverse law enforcement impact noted. FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU: Environmental: No comments DESIGN ENGINEERING: Environmental No comments TRAFFIC ENGINEERING: Environmental Provide street light Plan & Specifications to City standards. One luminaire required as marked in red on submittal drawing. Extend conduit under sidewalk for future street lighting as shown marked in red on drawing. Coordination with Puget Power required for overhead conductors to clear luminaire. UTILITY ENGINEERING: Environmental • No comments PARKS AND RECREATION: Environmental This project has been carefully reviewed at regular intervals and it is believed that it will have a positive environmental impact in terms of housing and land use. In terms of housing there are a number of factors to consider. It is the policy of H & CD to promote and support, with block grant dollars, new housing opportunities for low income citizens. The housing needs of the..developmentally disadvantaged have been well documented. A recent study (December 1987) by King County--Bridging the Housing Gap addresses the major issues facing the developmental disadvantaged population. The study points out that: Community based housing for people with developmental disabilities; as an alternative to state institutions, has its roots in the de- institutionalization movement. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA April 20, 1988 Third Floor Conference Room Commencing at 10:00 a.m. ,' CONTINUED PROJECTS ANNETTE HICKS, SUNSET DAYCARE CENTER Continued discussion of traffic impacts. RENTON AVENUE SOUTH SANITARY SEWER - PUBLIC WORKS Replacement of the small existing sanitary sewers with new eight-inch and ten-inch sewers. Property is located at Victoria Avenue S.W. from Renton Avenue South to Rainier Avenue South; Rainier Avenue South from Victoria to Tobin Avenue South; Hardie Avenue S.W. to the Cedar River pipeline. (ECF-101-87) RENTON FAMILY PRACTICE CENTER Application to rezone eight (8) lots (115'x 350')/.92 acres located at the Northwest corner intersection of South 5th Street and- Williams Avenue South from R-3 (Multiple-Family Residential) to B-1 (Commercial) to enable future commercial development at this site. This proposal includes three undeveloped lots, one lot developed with a single-family home and four lots developed with medical services, under a conditional use permit. Property located at 411 to 425 Williams Avenue South. (ECF-001-088; R-001-88) NEW PROJECTS CLARK, BOYDEN & KAUZLARICH REZONE Application for programmatic rezone of approximately 1.2 acres of property (three lots under separate ownership) from R-1 (Single-Family Residential Use) to L-1 (light Industrial Use) for future development as a light industrial use. Property located at 420, 500/504 & 508 South Tobin ECF-013-88; R 013-8810:30 FIGGINS REZONE SUNSET PROFESSIONAL CENTER Application to rezone approximately 1.44 acres of property from B-1 (Business Use) to B-1 (Business Use) for the purpose of eliminating existing restrictive covenants on the property which were established at the time of a previous rezoning of the property (R-019-86) to limit permitted uses. Property is located at 4444 N.E. Sunset Boulevard, north of N.E. Sunset Boulevard and east of Anacortes Avenue N.E. (ECF-017-88; R-017-88) THE RENTON RIDGE APARTMENTS - KBI DIVERSIFIED, LTD. Proposal to rezone 1.4 acres of property from R-1 to R-3. Proposal to combine that 1.4 acres with an adjacent 4.34 acre site, currently zoned R-4, and to obtain site plan approval to allow a 108 apartment complex unit on the resulting 5.74 acre property. Property is located on the west side of Aberdeen Avenue N.E., between 973 - 1021 Aberdeen Avenue N.E.005-88 (ECF-005-88; R-005-88; SA-005-88; FPUD-005-88) Environmental Review Committee Agenda April 20, 1988 Page 2 GOOD SHEPHERD OF WASHINGTON GROUP HOME Proposal to rezone a .847 acre parcel from R-1 (Single Family Residential) zoning to G-1 (General Use) zoning and application for a conditional use permit to develop a six resident, six bedroom group home for the developmentally disabled on the subject site. Property located on the south side of N.E. 19th Street at the 3900 block, between Union Avenue and Shelton Avenue N.E. (ECF-010-88; R-010-88; CU-010-88) GOOD SHEPHERD OF WASHINGTON GROUP HOME, OLYMPIA AVENUE N.E. Proposal to: 1) rezone subject property from RBI (Single Family Residential Use) to G-1 (General Use); 2) subdivide existing property into two lots; 3) develop a group home for six developmentally disabled adults (as a conditional use) on one of the new lots. Property locatted at the 1000 block of Olympia Avenue N.E., on the west side of the street, north of N.E. 10th Court and south of N.E. 10th Place. (ECF-015-88; R-015-88; CU-015-88; SH-PL-015-88 ) CITY OF RENTON-PUBLIC WORKS Widening of Lind Ave. S.W. from S.W. Grady Way to S.W. 12th Street. The work includes new 5-lane street, storm drainage, water main, underground utilities, street lighting, curb, gutters and sidewalks. Property located at Lind Ave. S.W. from S.W. Grady Way to S.W. 12th Street on the north side of 1-405 bridge overcrossing. (ECF-099-87) DISCUSSION HIGHLANDS COMMUNITY CHURCH ECF-003-88; CU-003-88; R-003-88 OTHER Vyzis Company letter. 1, ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE 10:00 A.M. Renton Municipal Building April 20, 1988 3rd Floor Conference Room MINUTES ATTENDING: Ron Nelson, Chairman; Larry Springer, Policy Development Director; Dick Houghton, Public Works Director; Don Erickson, Zoning Administrator; Mike Parness, Administrative Assistant; Jeanette Samek-McKague, Senior Planner; Carolyn Sundvall, Recording Secretary. CALL TO ORDER: The meeting was called to order by the Chairman. CONTINUED PROJECTS ANNETTE HICKS, SUNSET DAYCARE CENTER Continued discussion of traffic impacts. Don Erickson stated that there were concerns about traffic and left turns. Dick Houghton stated that if left turns became a problem, they would not be allowed and it would be resolved through Public Works. Other issues would be covered on the Conditional Use. DECISION: Ron Nelson made a motion to issue a Declaration of Non-Significance with the five conditions listed on the Staff Report. Dick Houghton seconded the motion. Carried. RENTON AVENUE SOUTH SANITARY SEWER - PUBLIC WORKS Replacement of the small existing sanitary sewers with new eight-inch and ten-inch sewers. Property is located at Victoria Avenue S.W. from Renton Avenue South to Rainier Avenue South; Rainier Avenue South from Victoria to Tobin Avenue South; Hardie Avenue S.W. to the Cedar River pipeline. (ECF-101-87) Jeanette Samek-McKague gave background information. She stated it was an application to replace the 6 inch lines with 8-10 inch lines. There is a local agreement with King County, Skyway, and the City of Renton that the City will serve this area and it is part of the Sewer Comprehensive Plan that the City is starting to implement. DECISION: Ron Nelson made a motion to issue a Declaration of Non-Significance. Larry Springer seconded the motion. RENTON FAMILY PRACTICE CENTER Application to rezone eight (8) lots (115'x 350')/.92 acres located at the Northwest corner intersection of South 5th Street and Williams Avenue South from R-3 (Multiple-Family Residential) to B-1 (Commercial) to enable future commercial development at this site. This proposal includes three undeveloped lots, one lot developed with a single-family home and four lots developed with medical services, under a conditional use permit. Property located at 411 to 425 Williams Avenue South. (ECF-001-088; R-001-88) Don Erickson referred to a letter from Roger Blaylock dated April 9, 1988 in which Mr. Blaylock addressed the issues presented to him by Don Erickson, who represented the ERC, in a meeting on April 6, 1988. Don stated that this was originally a rezone for the whole site, but now the applicant has come back with a contract rezone to satisfy, any questions the ERC had on a blanket rezone. The applicant had agreed to amend the rezone application with the following points: 1. Maximum development on the proposed rezone site shall be a total of 25,000 sq. ft. of building. 2. Site Plan approval will be required for all development exceeding 1,000 sq. ft. 3. The maximum height shall not exceed 50 feet which is the maximum height allowed in the adjacent R-3 classification. It would limit the development capacity of the site to less than 15% of that allowed in the standard B- 1, Business Use zoning. Don Erickson stated that this was consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The contract does limit the amount of development potential. The rezone itself is a non-project action. Jeanette stated that looking at the contract, it is not clear that they have agreed to B-1 just on the North 4 lots. DECISION: Larry Springer made a motion to issue a Declaration of Significance - Mitigated based on the EIS that was done when the Comp Plan was approved and based on the fact this is a rezone consistent with the rezone for the north 4 lots only. Ron Nelson seconded the motion. Carried. '`ERC Minutes • April 20, 1988 . NEW PROJECTS CLARK, BOYDEN & KAUZLARICH REZONE Application for programmatic rezone of approximately 1.2 acres of property (three lots under separate ownership) from R-1 (Single-Family Residential Use) to L-1 (light Industrial Use) for future development as a light industrial use. Property located at 420, 500/504 & 508 South Tobin ECF-013-88; R 013-88 Don Erickson gave background information. He stated that this was a non-project action that is consistent with the Comp Plan. He stated that there are three lots under separate ownership and at this point there are no major issues. The applicant did not specify what they will do with the property. Discussion then took place on the zoning for the surrounding sites. Larry Springer suggested that the applicant talk to Schumsky's and see if they would rezone their parking lot to B-1 at the same time to bring it up to conformity. DECISION: Larry Springer made a motion to issue a Declaration of Non-Significance based on the fact that SEPA compliance and EIS was done at the time the Comp Pan was approved. The staff report to the Hearing Examiner will recommend that the rezone go to B-1. In lack of B-1 zoning the committee will support L-1. The administration acknowledges that the Comp Plan is out-of-date in this area and B-1 is preferable. Ron Nelson seconded the motion. Carried. FIGGINS REZONE SUNSET PROFESSIONAL CENTER Application to rezone approximately 1.44 acres of property from B-1 (Business Use) to B-i (Business Use) for the purpose of eliminating existing restrictive covenants on the property which were established at the time of a previous rezoning of the property (R-019-86) to limit permitted uses. Property is located at 4444 N.E. Sunset Boulevard, north of N.E. Sunset Boulevard and east of Anacortes Avenue N.E. (ECF-017-88; R-017-88) Don Erickson gave background information. He stated that in 1986 we issued a Declaration of Non- Significance - Mitigated for a rezone which was to allow a medical office building on the site and its rezoned to B-1. Council approved the rezone in July of 1986. The applicant came back in 1987 when it was realized that the site plan had not been approved. The applicant felt that the architect hadn't picked up the site plan approval requirement. As a consequence, they went into Chapter 11. The applicant wants to broaden the use of the proposed office building from medical to general office. Discussion then took place. DECISION: Larry Springer made a motion to issue a Declaration of Non-Significance providing that there is a statement on the traffic impacts and circulation on this office complex stating if it will be less than or equal to what they had with the medical office building. Ron Nelson seconded the motion. Carried. THE RENTON RIDGE APARTMENTS - KBI DIVERSIFIED, LTD. Proposal to rezone 1.4 acres of property from R-1 to R-3. Proposal to combine that 1.4 acres with an adjacent 4.34 acre site, currently zoned R-4, and to obtain site plan approval to allow a 108 apartment complex unit on the resulting 5.74 acre property. Property is located on the west side of Aberdeen Avenue N.E., between 973 - 1021 Aberdeen Avenue N.E.005-88 (ECF-,005-88; R-005-88; SA-005-88; FPUD-005-88) Don Erickson gave background information. He stated that major concern was the steep sloops on the site, which has a 40 foot drop. The units are presently cutting down into the grade. Also, a second means of access to the site was needed for emergency vehicles. Dick Houghton stated that there is a major drainage issue and that the units should be 100 feet back from the ravine. The Committee then discussed having a soils report and engineering report done on this site. Erickson then recommended a Declaration of Significance and ask the applicant to look at reasonable alternatives or amend the application. DECISION: It was in agreement to hold the project until Don had a chance to meet with the applicant and stress strong support for Declaration of Significance. ERC Minutes April 20, 1988 GOOD SHEPHERD OF WASHINGTON GROUP HOME Proposal to rezone a .847 acre parcel from R-1 (Single Family Residential) zoning to G-1 (General Use) zoning and application for a conditional use permit to develop a six resident, six bedroom group home for the developmentally disabled on the subject site. Property located on the south side of N.E. 19th Street at the 3900 block, between Union Avenue and Shelton Avenue N.E. (ECF-010-88; R-010-88; CU-010-88) GOOD SHEPHERD OF WASHINGTON GROUP HOME, OLYMPIA AVENUE N.E. Proposal to: 1) rezone subject property from R-1 (Single Family Residential Use) to G-1 (General Use); 2) subdivide existing property into two lots; 3) develop a group home for six developmentally disabled adults (as a conditional use) on one of the new lots. Property located at the 1000 block of Olympia Avenue N.E., on the west side of the street, north of N.E. 10th Court and south of N.E. 10th Place. (ECF-015-88; R-015-88; CU-015-88; SH-PL-015-88 ) Don Erickson gave background information on both projects. He then showed the Committee pictures on Good Shepherd Group Home in Oregon. It became clear to the ERC that the Conditional Use could not be spotted and that the homes did blend in well with the surrounding area. Dick Houghton stated that environmentally there are no major impacts. Mike Parness asked that ERC address issues such as wheelchair ramps, street lighting, and sidewalks. Discussion then took place. DECISION: The projects would be brought back to ERC in two weeks with additional information. CITY OF RENTON-PUBLIC WORKS Widening of Lind Ave. S.W. from S.W. Grady Way to S.W. 12th Street. The work includes new 5-lane street, storm drainage, water main, underground utilities, street lighting, curb, gutters and sidewalks. Property located at Lind Ave. S.W. from S.W. Grady Way to S.W. 12th Street on the north side of I- 405 bridge overcrossing. (ECF-099-87) Dick Houghton gave background information. The issues were then reviewed on the Staff Report and discussion took place. DECISION: As there are no major environmental impacts, Ron Nelson made a motion to issue a Declaration of Non-Significance. Larry Springer seconded the motion. DISCUSSION HIGHLANDS COMMUNITY CHURCH ECF-003-88; CU-003-88; R-003-88 Don Erickson reviewed the project with ERC members. He referred to a letter dated April 11, 1988 from Dale Shuck responding to questions presented to him in a letter from Mr. Erickson dated March 29, 1988. Concerns related to noise levels, traffic, and placement of the new addition were adequately addressed. DECISION: Ron Nelson made a motion to issue a Declaration of Non-Significance - Mitigated with the conditions listed on the Staff Report. Dick Houghton seconded the motion. Carried. ADJOURNED The meeting was adjourned at 11:45 a.m. !/ - . BUILDING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT , ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE STAFF REPORT April 20, 1988 A. BACKGROUND: APPLICANT: Good Shepherd of Washington a PROJECT: Good Shepherd Group Home for the Developmentally Disabled ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST: (ECF-010-88 ; R-010-88; CU-010-88) DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Proposal to rezone a .847 acre parcel from R-1 (Single Family Residential) zoning to G-1 (General Use) zoning and application for a conditional use permit to develop a six resident, six bedroom group home for the developmentally disabled on the subject site. The portion of the site planned for development is presently vacant; there is an existing house on the remaining property which will be retained. The area surrounding the site is zoned for single family residences and is generally so developed. Churches and other community service facilities are also in place in the area. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: The south side of N.E. 19th Street at the 3900 block, between Union Avenue and Shelton Avenue N.E. Y,4 1 s , - 11 5 , 7; 1 ' 35 !.ilk. ; it,..!, z99 tri7° 10,a „ lae7--.- ibs'23' 205 1 _ _ , , 3111 N,! �be1 1 s zb,z,9 Q p. G_ 1 •/�.JO/' t t ,‘A ! 301 z,�a a ®A;6)zao ma • ill / �N 1 jL J0. N 20 Lw ST 702 S ,� sl .z , < .�ro 1 , •• • ..- I ,-\\ 1 C'.-4,1 I �.i • ff.... ' 'Df ee 9.4[710 .' a 3, Q 1 . I f. 1 35 t° z ,' W 1 1 t o e 2 vL Ar �� H ® 'I.. ,c 4 ! , , I 1 _ , G ••L i E 17[.. - .; �1 _, g . t , I• , l 1 f= �1.i{ a� 1 �1 t_ le i• U_. b, 8z elcomESE ,, zz z, zoh• 1 1 �I :,•.�,,, 1i11� -. 1 I 1 1•��- _._— - 4 E _ 17T_" 5 j 1.�6�6+4 `� a E • 19 1 1 Z 3 4 5 G 7 519 io l 1 u n i4 It is H..°` R-2 1 Y( G __ i ♦mml R-3t /7i • . R-2 1 1l � Q�3 'Its t 0, ! / B- 1 — 1 aEl ..yT 1 1 _ '.. Wes{ a -= 11 1 i_ I� - s _ ! Building and Zoni: Good Shepherd of L ,hington April 19, 1988 Page 2 B. ISSUES: 1. Whether additional action is planned for the site at a future point? The size and configuration of this property is such that there is sufficient land for additional sub-division, rezoning and development. No proposals for these actions are described in this application form, however, it would be useful to have informati9n concerning potential future plans for this property in order to provide a complete evaluation of the present application. 2 . Whether the design and placement of the proposed group home on the property is appropriate to the location of the site and consistent with other developments in the neighborhood? The group home has been designed to reflect the residential character of the neighborhood. The proposed structure is consistent with homes in the vicinity. Required ingress/egress routes and parking facilities have been located to provide for safe, efficient operation of the home and to limit impacts upon the neighborhood. 3. Whether adequate accommodations have been made to address anticipated vehicle and pedestrian traffic for this site? Vehicle traffic to the site will be confined to daily trips made by four employees and occasional trips by service personnel (e.g. delivery vans, medical personnel) . The group home residents will not drive vehicles. They will leave the facility as passengers in staff vehicles, or as pedestrians (accompanied by staff as necessary) . The number and types of trips to and from the site are characteristic of those made in the surrounding residential neighborhood and are anticipated to cause no significant impact on the area. 4. Whether sufficient landscaping, screening and related amenities have been provided to enhance the subject site and to buffer it from neighboring properties? It is suggested that this facility be designed to incorporate additional amenities for the residents (e.g. a patio or deck with southern exposure, a greater variety of plantings to supplement the planned lawn area) . Additionally, it is recommended that larger shrubs and trees be utilized to enhance the property and to provide better separation between the site and neighboring properties. Building and Zoni Good Shepherd of _ __ hington April 19, 1988 Page 3 C. RECOMMENDATIONS: ' It is recommended that the ERC issue a Determination of Non-Significance - Mitigated - with the following conditions: 1. The applicant shall work with the City to develop a plan for approved hours of operation, erosion control, drainage management, and cleaning of construction equipment while the home is being constructed, in order to protect the integrity of the development site and the adjoining, neighborhood. 2. The applicant shall provide a revised landscaping plans incorporating a greater number of plantings and larger shrubs and trees in order to enhance the property and to provide better visual separation between the site and neighboring properties. 3 . That the applicant provide the City with a $2000. 00 revolving cash bond to ensure that the roadway is kept clean of dirt and debris. NOTE TO APPLICANT: 1. The applicant needs to have a 20 foot wide driveway. 2 . Additionally, it is suggested that this facility be designed to incorporate additional amenities for the residents (e.g. a patio or deck with southern exposure, a greater variety of plantings to supplement the planned lawn area) . 3. That the applicant meet all requirements set by the Uniform Building Code for the construction of the group home facility. D. COMMENTS OF REVIEWING DEPARTMENTS: Various City departments have reviewed and commented upon the project. These comments are as follows: POLICE DEPARTMENT: Environmental: No adverse law enforcement impact noted. FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU: Environmental: No comments DESIGN ENGINEERING: Environmental No comments TRAFFIC ENGINEERING: Environmental Provide street light Plan & Specifications to City standards. One luminaire required as marked in red on submittal drawing. Extend conduit under sidewalk for future street lighting as shown marked in red on drawing. Building and Zoni ' Good Shepherd of thington April 19, 1988 Page 4 Coordination with Puget Power required for overhead conductors to clear luminaire. UTILITY ENGINEERING: Environmental No comments PARKS AND RECREATION: Environmental This project has been carefully reviewed at regular intervals and it is believed that it w,ill have a positive environmental impact in terms of housing and land use. In terms of housing there are a number of factors to consider. It is the policy of H & CD to promote and support, with block grant dollars, new housing opportunities for low income citizens. The housing needs of the developmentally disadvantaged have been well documented. A recent study (December 1987) by King County--Bridging the Housing Gap addresses the major issues facing the developmental disadvantaged population. The study points out that: Community based housing for people with developmental disabilities, as an alternative to state institutions, has its roots in the de- institutionalization movement. Court decisions mandated deinstitutionalization and the creation of residential alternatives in the community. AtAbout the same time, the community environment was promoted as the best means for encouraging individual growth. The concept of normalization would provide the opportunity for integration into normal life and habititation would support the provision of services in the lease restrictive setting. BUILDING DIVISION: Environmental No comments ZONING DIVISION: Environmental Are there any proposals to develop the western half of the site in the future? The backyard area could be enhanced for the residents, i.e. : Patio or deck with south exposure, improved landscaping in the back other than just fencing and lawn. POLICY DEVELOPMENT: Environmental No comments. TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE AGENDA April 13, 1988 Third Floor Conference Room Commencing at 10:00 a.m. TIME/KEY PARTICIPANTS NEW 10:00 All Clark, Boyden & Kauzlarich Rezone Application for programmatic rezone of approximately 1.2 acres of property (three lots under separate ownership) from R-1 (Single-Family Residential Use) to L-1 (light Industrial Use) for future development as a light industrial use. Property located at 420, 500/504 & 508 South Tobin ECF-013-88; R 013-88 10:30 Garry Norris, Traffic Figgins Rezone Sunset Professional Center Application to rezone approximately 1.44 acres of property from B-1 (Business Use) to B-1 (Business Use) for the purpose of eliminating existing restrictive covenants on the property which were established at the time of a previous rezoning of the property (R-019-86) to limit permitted uses. Property is located at 4444 N.E. Sunset Boulevard, north of N.E. Sunset Boulevard and east of Anacortes Avenue N.E. (ECF-017-88; R-017-88) 10:45 Garry Norris, Traffic; The Renton Ridge Apartments - KBI Diversified, Glen Gordon, Ltd. Fire Prevention; 1. Proposal to rezone 1.4 acres of property Nancy Laswell- from R-1 to R-3. Morris, Policy Development 2. Proposal to combine that 1.4 acres with an adjacent 4.34 acre site, currently zoned R-4, and to obtain site plan approval to allow a 108 apartment complex unit on the resulting 5.74 acre property. Property is located on the west side of Aberdeen Avenue N.E., between 973 - 1021 Aberdeen Avenue N.E.005-88 (ECF-005-88; R-005-88; SA- 005-88; FPUD-005-88) 11:15 Glenn Gordon, Fire Prevention; Good Shepherd of Washington Group Home John Morris, Parks Proposal to rezone a .847 acre parcel from R-1 & Recreation (Single Family Residential) zoning to G-1 (General Use) zoning and application for a conditional use permit to develop a six resident, six bedroom group home for the developmentally disabled on the subject site. Property located on the south side of N.E. 19th Street at the 3900 block, between Union Avenue and Shelton Avenue N.E. (ECF-010-88; R- 010-88; CU-010-88) Technical Advisory Committee Agenda April 13, 1988 Page 2 11:30 Glenn Gordon, Good Shepherd of Washington Group Home, Fire Marshall, Olympia Avenue N.E. John Morris, Proposal to: 1) rezone subject property from R-1 Parks & Recreation (Single Family Residential Use) to G-1 (General Use); 2) subdivide existing property into two lots; 3) develop a group home for six developmentally disabled adults (as a conditional use) on one of the new lots. Property locatted at the 1000 block of Olympia Avenue N.E., on the west side of the street, north of N.E. 10th Court and south of N.E. 10th Place. (ECF-015-88; R-015-88; CU-015-88; SH-PL-015-88 ) 10:15 Garry Norris, Traffic CONTINUED Annette Hicks, Sunset Daycare Center Continued discussion of traffic impacts. 11:45 Other Vyzis Company letter. 11:50 Adjourn Co BUILDING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE STAFF REPORT April 13 , 1988 A. BACKGROUND: APPLICANT: Good Shepherd of Washington PROJECT: Good Shepherd Group Home for the Developmentally Disabled ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST: (ECF-010-88; R-010-88 ; CU-010-88) DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Proposal to rezone a .847 acre parcel from R-1 (Single Family Residential) zoning to G-1 (General Use) zoning and application for a conditional use permit to develop a six resident, six bedroom group home for the developmentally disabled on the subject site. The portion of the site planned for development is presently vacant; there is an existing house on the remaining property which will be retained. The area surrounding the site is zoned for , single family residences and is generally so developed. Churches and other community service facilities are also in place in the area. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: The south side of N.E. 19th Street at the 3900 block, between Union Avenue and Shelton Avenue N.E. .r.��ter 4 t.•y '�'!� s t �t�+�fi � }1' .i—.t y ...).. .,••i•t. ). 301 O 7 n 7Se 205 . - -,t. ..tip,.. '1- , 302 a4 2`2b0 s2ns t)9 ...2°4 ■ % 7 / 11111k1.11 l I 1 303 > 4.' n N I 4,) rei Tao a 203 • 7— 1111 /CJO/ `y s.1 I -- —1N 2.0•V " ST 202 M • / Illirei . t, ' Sus 7 e $ 'O .2 3 '4 ion _ • • '. ..\K'•.'•,..,11� -le 11 I' /c • T 1 I LI . s . .:�� Y t /' e99n a by '40 3° 36 4 `If Q m® is 1 , v,l►v.! u/UN-r 1 „..?... '1 - ^IW �/ .., •'_•. '6� ,��� ®®� 4 a, 32 3' 1 I 2—mot-1� 2 c�7� �� h •.,r s % a .�t v. ..,, 1/ /- I _ 1 1 1 I .�� 13 16 7. I -.. ,60.V i.+ !t" c1 Q it rc1N19 • i E 1113 G. • J I ^4 0 ;4 8. x®�LM���peiti 2) b Ld u'rf •I'• �®+� • ^• 1 I `11 I c;7 ,e 17... 6s gz Egm�5MlV� °.11 rr r, ro' 11. 6 5•4 -31` I. y X( i7" S T I I I , Z j 4 6 6 '7 t3,`•2 i 0,1 ,r ,s ,4 K K CI,. • . 't . I t ` 1 1 � I o R-2 G71 B_ 1 l i , 1111111.1111-2 , Rtttt.3 7 iPT "\,, 1)1 u7 ` ' �,� I , 1 . Building and Zoni-- TAC Staff Report 4/13/88 Page 2 B. ISSUES: (LAND USE) 1. Whether the rezone is consistent with the intent of the Comprehensive Map? The Comprehensive Map designates the subject property as desirable for single family residential development. As the proposed action is to down-zone the property for less intensive development, there is no conflict with the Comprehensive Plan. 2 . Whether the proposed group home is a permitted use in the General Use zone? The proposed group home for six developmentally disabled residents is permissible as a conditional use in the G- 1 zone. Further, such a use is encouraged by legal actions which have mandated deinstitutionalization and the creation of residential alternatives in the community (Bridging the Housing Gap, King County December, 1987) 3 . Whether. a rezone shall be conditioned to prescribe specific restrictions for development of the subject property? It is recommended that the City exercise its permitted authority to include a restrictive covenant (running with the land) in the rezone action to ensure that in the event the Good Shepherd Group Home is discontinued, the zoning on the property will revert back to the currently existing R-1 zoning. This covenant is recommended to promote consistency in zoning and use for the area which is generally desirable. 4. Whether sufficient improvements to public works— traffic. and utilities structures are available to serve the proposed use on the subject property? The following improvements to the property shall be required at the time of development in order to provide adequate public services to the proposed group home: a) an on-site drainage system to be designed and constructed to conform to requirements established by code; b) street lighting, planned with specifications to City standards; c) extension of conduit under sidewalk for future street lighting; d) clear luminaries for overhead conductors as required by Puget Power; e) sewer systems to be developed as required by Utilities. Engineering; f) water systems to be developed as required by Utilities Engineering; and g) off-site improvements as required by the Public Works Department. , Building and Zoni„c, TAC Staff Report 4/13/88 Page 3 5. Whether requirements established in current Fire and Building Codes and established by Police Department guidelines have been adequately addressed in this development application? Fire Department regulations require that two fire hydrants be installed to approved specifications, with the primary hydrant to be within 150 feet of the structure and the secondary hydrant(s) to be within 300 feet of the structure. In addition the structure shall be required to have an approved automatic smoke detection and alarm system. One access road will be required -- that road and any alternate access roads will need to be constructed and paved prior to building of the group home. All Building Code regulations must be met for construction of the group home. The Police Department has not made any recommendations for this development. 6. Whether sufficient measures have been taken to mitigate impacts anticipated to occur during the construction of the group home? The applicant should work with the City to develop a plan for approved hours of operation, erosion control, drainage management, and cleaning of construction equipment while the home is being constructed. (ENVIRONMENT) 1. Whether additional action is planned for the site .at a future, point? The size and configuration of this property is such that there is sufficient land for additional sub-division, rezoning and development. No proposals for these actions are described in this application form, however, it would be useful to have information concerning potential future plans for this property in order to provide a complete evaluation of the present application. 2 . Whether the design and placement of the proposed group home .on the property is appropriate to the location of the site and consistent with other, developments in the neighborhood? The group home has been designed to reflect the residential character of the neighborhood. The proposed structure is consistent with homes in the vicinity. Required ingress/egress routes and parking facilities have been located to provide for safe, efficient operation of the home ' and to limit impacts upon the neighborhood. .Building and Zoni„n TAC Staff Report 4/13/88 Page 4 3 . Whether adequate accommodations have been made to address .anticipated vehicle and pedestrian traffic for this site? Vehicle traffic to the site will be confined to daily trips made by four employees and occasional trips by service personnel (e.g. delivery vans, medical personnel) . The group home residents will not drive vehicles. They will leave the facility as passengers in staff vehicles, or as pedestrians (accompanied by staff as necessary) . The number and types of trips to and from the site are characteristic of those made in the surrounding residential neighborhood and are anticipated to cause no significant impact on the area. 4. Whether sufficient landscaping, screening_ and related amenities have been provided to enhance. the subject site and to buffer it from neighboring properties? It is suggested that this facility be designed to incorporate additional amenities for the residents (e.g. a patio or deck with southern exposure, a greater variety of plantings to supplement the planned lawn area) . Additionally, it is recommended that larger shrubs and trees be utilized to enhance the property and to provide better separation between the site and neighboring properties. C: RECOMMENDATIONS: It is recommended that the ERC issue a Determination of Non-Significance - Mitigated - with the following conditions: 1. The City shall exercise its permitted authority to include a restrictive covenant (running with the land) in the rezone action to ensure that in the event the Good Shepherd Group Home is discontinued, then the zoning on the property will revert back to the currently existing R-1 zoning. 2 . The applicant shall make the following improvements to the property as required, at the time of development in order to provide adequate public services to the proposed group home: a) an on-site drainage system to be designed and constructed to conform to requirements established by code; b) street lighting, planned with specifications to City standards; c) extension of conduit under sidewalk for future street lighting; d) clear luminaries for overhead conductors as required by Puget Power; e) sewer systems to be developed as required by Utilities Engineering; f) water systems to be developed as required by Utilities Engineering; and g) off-site improvements to be specified by the Public Works Department. Building and Zonirn TAC Staff Report 4/13/88 Pags 6 3 . The applicant shall meet Fire Department regulations requiring that two fire hydrants be installed to approved specifications, with the primary hydrant to be within 150 feet of the structure and the secondary hydrant(s) to be within 300 feet of the structure. In addition the structure shall be required to have an approved automatic smoke detection and alarm system. One access road shall be required -- that road and any alternate access roads will need to be constructed and paved prior to building of the group home. These improvements shall be made in order to ensure the availability of adequate emergency services to the site. 4. The applicant shall meet all requirements set by the Uniform Building Code for the construction of the group home facility. 5. The applicant shall work with the City to develop a plan for approved hours of operation, erosion control, drainage management, and cleaning of construction equipment while the home is being constructed, in order to protect the integrity of the development site and the adjoining neighborhood. 6. The applicant shall provide a revised landscaping plans incorporating a greater number of plantings and larger shrubs and trees in order to enhance the property and to provide better visual separation • between the site and neighboring properties. 7 . The applicant should provide to the City information concerning future plans for development of this site. 8 . Additionally, it is suggested that this facility be designed to incorporate additional amenities for the residents (e.g. a patio or deck with southern exposure, a greater variety of plantings to supplement the planned lawn area) . D. COMMENTS OF REVIEWING DEPARTMENTS: Various City departments have reviewed and commented upon the project. These comments are as follows: POLICE DEPARTMENT: Environmental: Land Use: No comments. FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU: Environmental: Land Use: No comments. Building and Zoni,; TAC Staff Report 4/13/88 Page b DESIGN ENGINEERING: Environmental Land Use: Off-site improvements required. Design and plan of on site drainage required. TRAFFIC ENGINEERING: Environmental Land Use: Provide street light Plan and specifications to City standards. One luminaire required as marked in red on submitted of drawing. Extend conduit under sidewalk for future street lighting as shown marked in red on drawing. Coordination with Puget Power required for overhead conductors to clear luminaries. UTILITY ENGINEERING: Environmental Land Use: Approved with conditions PARKS A D RECREATION: Environmental Land Use: The Group Home has been designed to reflect the residential character of the neighborhood. Landscaping is abundant and has been used as a buffer where appropriate, i.e. ; to buffer the streetscape from the staff parking area. BUILDING DIVISION: Environmental Land Use: Must meet "Building" codes for occupancy proposed. ZONING DIVISION: Environmental Land Use: Recommend the rezone from G-1 to R-1 with a. restrictive covenant that if the Good Shepherd Group Home is discontinued, then the zoning on the property should revert back to the Original R-1 zoning designation. Recommend approval of the Conditional Use Permit to allow the Group Home. Shrub and trees planting seem rather undersized. Recommend larger plant sizes at initial planting. Building and Zonir- TAC Staff Report 4/13/88 Page i POLICY DEVELOPMENT: Environmental Land Use: No comment. \ I %0 CITY I F •F :°NT N ////// EAL, .yi BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor Ronald G. Nelson, Director March 14, 1988 Howard R. Kienle 732 Melody Lane Enumclaw, WA 98022 RE: Good Sheperd of Washington File ECF-010-88 ; R-010-88 ; CU-010-88 Dear Mr. Kienle: The Building and Zoning Department has formally accepted the above referenced application. It has been routed for departmental review and is tentatively scheduled for the Technical Advisory Committee on April 6, 1988 for consideration. If you have any questions regarding the scheduling of this project, please contact our office at 235-2550. Sincerely, I ,/ (77_51,,a . i Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator accepltr/goodshep/1 DKE: 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2540 4,0, CITY OF a' ENTON Lt, BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor Ronald G. Nelson, Director March 14, 1988 Good Sheperd of Washington 18940 Marine View Drive S.W. Seattle, WA 98166 RE: Good Sheperd of Washington File ECF-010-88 ; R-010-88 ; CU- 010-88 Ladies and Gentlemen: The Building and Zoning Department has formally accepted the above referenced application. It has been routed for departmental review and is tentatively scheduled for the Technical Advisory Committee on April 6, 1988 for consideration. If you have any questions regarding the scheduling of this project, please contact our office at 235-2550. S . ely, V Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator accepltr/goodshep/1 DKE: 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 = (206) 235-2540 .4400 F CITY OF ENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor Ronald G. Nelson, Director March 14, 1988 Darlene Long 4751 South 172nd Place Seattle, WA 98166 RE: Good Sheperd of Washington File ECF-010-88; R-010-88 ; CU- 010-88 Dear Ms. Lona: The Building and Zoning Department has formally accepted the above referenced application. It has been routed for departmental review and is tentatively scheduled for the Technical Advisory Committee on April 6, 1988 for consideration. If you have any questions regarding the scheduling of this project, please contact our office at 235-2550. Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator accepltr/goodshep/1 DKE: 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2540 ; • /1110C%iy,_ 2149N ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET 4,`O /9y9 • Ati3O REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: clyACS ��� J0 ,�� MARCH 10 1988COMMENTSDUE: MARCH 18,E 88 DATE CIRCULATED: � � ?..9� EFC - 010 - 88 �'��e APPLICATION NO(S). : REZONE: R-•010-88, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT: CU-010-88 0k4s PROPONENT: GOOD SHEPHERD_OF WASHINGTON is PROJECT TITLE: GOOD SHEPHERD GROUP HOME BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION TO REZONE APPROXIMATELY 0.85 ACRE OF PROPERTY FROM R-1 TO G-1 (DOWN ZONING) AND APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW A SIX RESIDENT, SIX BEDROOM GROUP HOME FOR THE DEVELOPMENTALLY DISABLED. LOCATION: LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF N.E. 19th STREET AT THE 3900 BLOCK, BETWEEN UNION AVENUE N.E. AND SHELTON AVENUE N.E. SITE AREA: 0.85 ACRE BUILDING AREA (gross): 2,528 SQ. FT. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services tl " 16) Utilities I COMMENTS: This project has been carefully reviewed at regular intervals and it is believed that it will have a positive environmental impact in terms of housing and land use. In terms of .housing there. are, a number of factors to consider. It is "the policy of H&CD to promote and support, with block grant dollars, new housing opportunities for low income citizens. The housing needs of the developmentally disadvantaged have been well documented. A recent study (December 1987) by King County-- Bridging the Housing Gap addresses the major issues facing the developmentally • disadvantaged population. . The study points out that: Community .based housing for people with developmental disabilities, as an alternative to state institutions, has its roots in the de- institutionalization movement. Court decisions mandated deinstitutionalization and the creation of residential alternatives in the community. At about the same time, the community environment was promoted as the best means for- encouraging individual growth. The concept of normalization would provide the opportunity for integration into normal life and habilitation would support the provision of services in the least restrictive setting. * We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas we have expertise in and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. //1/ Signs of Director r Authn' ed Representative Date *continued• ee attached • Form 4 !// ENVIRONMENTAL CHECK&ST REVIEW SHEET • EFC-010-88; REZONE: R-010-88, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT: CU-010-88 GOOD SHEPHERD GROUP HOME March 18, 1988 Page Two The concepts of normalization and habilitation were supported by state and federal legislation passed in the 1970s. The 1975 Developmentally Disability Assistance and Bill of Rights Act pro- vide for protection and advocacy of human and legal rights and the promotion of deinstitutionalization and normalization through community placement.1 As a result of these efforts, "Community residential facilities for people with develop- mental disabilities in the United States grew from 611 in 1972-1974 to 6,414 in 1982. 2 However, "Existing housing programs for people with developmental disa- bilities have limited space, due to limited funding; and public housing authorities maintain long waiting lists." 3 Additionally, "Although the array of housing for the developmentally disabled has increased in the past few years, many individuals continue to be housed in inappropriate settings..... A 1986survey of DDD case managers concerning residential needs illustrates the problem. Case managers identified 292 individuals needing more appropriate settings. An additional 612 individuals who are King County residents need subsidized housing or are in state institutions and targeted to return home." 4 The proposed Good Shepherd Group Home on N.E. 19th Street will be a step in the right direction toward addressing the housing needs of the developmentally dis- advantaged. Also, the neighborhood will be improved with a widened road, curbs gutters and sidewalks from the site to Union Avenue N. E. Finally, enclosed for your. consideration are; 1) Bellevue's group home zoning code, and 2) summaries of value input studies completed over the last ten years. The most common method used by the researchers was to track home sales in the immediate vicinity of the special residences and compare those sales to sales in a similar control neighborhood. Attachments Footnotes: BRIDGING THE HOUSING GAP, King County, December 1987 1, Page 19 2, Page 19 3, page 21 4, page 24 • ZONING CODE PROVISIONS FOR SPECIAL POPULATION HOUSING IN KING COUNTY WOE NUMBER OF JURISDICTION REFRENCE TYPE OF RESIDENTIAL FACILITY RESIDENTS WHERE ALLOWED APPROVAL PROCESS ALLOWED Algona 5.040 "Custodial care facilities: 1) physically disabled, No limit All zones Conditional Use aged, mentally confused or disturbed persons, or (up to 5 Permit (CUP) or persons who suffer from a mental deficiency which unrelated Planned Unit renders them incapable of assuming those respon- individuals Development (PUD) sibilities expected of the socially adequate per dwelling) individual, who require supervision, personal and/or health care." Auburn 18.04.060 "Boarding House" (3 or more boarders), "nursing No limit R-2 (single family, CUP and .430 home, rest home, convalescent home, guest home 6,000 sq. ft. lot) and home for the aged". "Foster care home" and all higher (not defined). density zones ABellevue . .50.020 and --"--;--1—. Group-Care Homes, Class I. State-licensed See col. 3 Class I-A permitted Permitted outright .022, 20.10.440 —foster homes for children (not including nursing in all single-family homes), homes for handicapped and physically (up to 6 zones subject to disabled, and homes for those with developmental unrelated 1,000-foot dispersal disabilities. Group-Care Homes, Class I, are individuals sub-classified as follows: per dwelling) Class 1-B permitted Permitted outright A. Group-Care Homes, Class 1-A - a maximum of in all multi-family 8 residents & 2 resident staff; zones, subject to B. Group-Care Homes, Class 1-B - a maximum of 1,000-foot dispersal 12 residents & 2 resident staff; C. Group-Care Homes, Class I-C - a maximum of Class I-C and CUP 20 residents & 4 resident staff. Class Il-B and C group homes permitted 2. Group Care Homes, Class II: State-licensed in multi-family zones group-care homes for juvenile delinquents, halfway houses providing residence in lieu of institutional sentencing, halfway house providing Class II-A permitted Permitted outright residence to those needing correctional and mental in all residential in multifamily institutions, and residential rehabilitation zones zones; CUP in centers for alcohol and drug abusers. Group-Care single family zones Homes, Class II, are sub-classified as follows: A. Group-Care Homes, Class II-A - a maximum of 6 residents & 2 resident staff; B. Group-Care Homes, Class II-B - a maximum of 10 residents & 2 resident staff; and C. Group-Care homes, Class II-C - a maximum of 20 residents & 4 resident staff. •M • • ' j��$�i }y. ` ..aim€' .:A� _ ' _ .1,:�''t � 4a rtk ' 4 is ,' • SUMMARY OF PROPERTY VALUE IMPACT STUDIES DATE OF NUMBER SIZE OF AREA STUDY/LOCATION OF HOMES VARIABLES STUDIED FROM TIME t AUTHOR(S) POPULATION GROUP STUDIED STUDIED GROUP HOME PERIOD STUDIED CONCLUSIONS Boeckh, John 1980/Toronto/ 5 -sales price 400 4 yrs: 2 yrs before No evidence of decline in Michael Dear & mentally ill -sales activity meters group home estab- sales price in group home S. Martin Taylor lished, 2 yrs after neighborhood; sales - activity equal to that in control neighborhood. Breslow, Stuart 1976/White Plains, 16 -sales price - 12 yrs: 6 yrs before Inconclusive; no decrease NY/DD, mentally -sales activity home established, 2 in property value (some ill, veterans, depen- yrs after increases); increased turn- dent & neglected over. children & the elderly City of Lansing 1976/Lansing, - 5 neighborhoods -sales price - V - Property value equal to or MI/mentally retarded, containing group -assessed value higher than control neigh- adult ex-offenders, homes -sales activity borhood; no increase in youth offenders, reco- sales activity vering alcoholics Dear, Michael 1977/Philadelphia, PA/ 12 -sales price 6 blocks 4 yrs: 2 yrs before, No decrease in value; turn- mentally ill -sales activity 2 yrs after over rates inconclusive Developmental 1982/Minnesota/men- 14 -sales price 1 block 2 yrs No decrease in value; no Disabilities tally retarded -assessed value increase in turnover Program -sales activity Dolan, Lawrence 1982 (update of 1978 32 -sales price - 5 yrs after group No decrease In value; no & Julian Wolpert study)/New York State/ -distance from home establishment increased turnover; no dif- mentally retarded group home - ference in transactions/ -sales activity value closer to group home • Dolan, Lawrence 1978/New York State/ 42 -sales price - 1 yr after estab- No decrease in value; & Julian Wolpert mentally retarded -sales turnover lishment of group distance from group home -distance from home not significant; no - group home increase in sales activity • • K:SP-B.1 .._ 1148LfigalNNEMV-4sti%+�'.�".��01'F}<iikri. 1:7 ''., - ....._..,,. DATE OF NUMBER SIZE OF AREA . STUDY/LOCATION OF HOMES VARIABLES STUDIED FROM TIME AUTHOR(S) POPULATION GROUP STUDIED STUDIED GROUP HOME PERIOD STUDIED CONCLUSIONS Goodale, Tom 1979/Ottawa/develop- 38 -sales price 1 block 2 yrs: 1 yr before Homes nearest to group home mentally disabled -sales activity establishment, 1 yr experienced increased value -assessed value after 62% of time; 38% of time -number of days reverse was true; no increase property listed in turnover; time on market -selling price vs. data inconclusive asking price -distance from • • group home ! `. Lauber, Daniel 1986/Chicago & other 14 -mean sales price 5 block 4 yrs No decrease in property rural and urban areas -sales activity radius value; no increased sales in Illinois/develop- - activity mentally disabled Lindauer, Martin 1980/medium-sized 7 -sales price - 4 yrs: 2 yrs before ; Higher sales activity just northeastern city and -sales activity establishment, 2 yrs prior to opening of group three adjoining towns/ after home; however, decrease in mentally retarded. f, property value not exper- ienced; 5 neighborhoods showed increased value Mambort, Terence 1981/Montgomery 7 -sales activity - 4 yrs: 2 yrs before, In neighborhoods which were County, OH/mentally -sales price vs. establishment, 2 yrs rs veryvocal in opposition • retarded asking price after establishment of r p to home, homes sold lower than market price for up to 1 yr after home established, then returned to normal; neighborhoods not opposed experienced no decrease in property value or increased sales Ryan, Carey & 1985/Eastern Nebraska/ 13 -sales activity 1200 feet 4 yrs: 1 yr before, No increase in turnover; no Ann Coyne mentally retarded -sales price vs. 3 yrs after increase in time house on asking price market; list & sales prices -distance from increased group home -time house on market S'"t. Paul, Minn. 1981/Twin Cities & 14 -sales price- 1 block 2 yrs: 2 yr before, No decrease in value; no other towns in -sales activity 2 yrs after increase in turnover Minnesota -assessed value - K:SP-B.2 • • • . 4 DATE OF NUMBER SIZE OF AREA STUDY/LOCATION OF HOMES VARIABLES STUDIED FROM TIME AUTHOR(S) POPULATION GROUP STUDIED . STUDIED GROUP HOME PERIOD STUDIED CONCLUSIONS Suffolk Community 1984/Suffolk County, 7 sales price - 3 yrs: 18 months No. decrease in value; no Council NY/psychiatric & devel- - -sales activity before, 18 months increased turnover; days on opmentally disabled -distance from after market did not increase group home -number of days on market - - -assessed value - Wagner, Christopher 1980 (update of 1979 8 -time on market - - No decrease in value (one & Christine Mitchell study)/Franklin County -sales price vs. neighborhood increased); no (Columbus), OH/devel- asking price increase in time on market { opmentally disabled adults, mentally ill adults, neglected, dependent, or unruly male adolescents - Wagner, Christopher 1979/Franklin County 8 -time on market - 1 yr: 6 mos before, No decrease In value; no & Christine Mitchell (Columbus), OH/devel- -sales price vs. 6 mos after (6 increase in time on market opmentally disabled asking price homes used date of adults, mentally ill purchase of group adults, neglected, home as midpoint. dependent, or unruly - - 2 used date of male adolescents occupancy) Wiener, Dirk, 1982/two Iowa Communi- 8 -sales price 1 block 3 mos No decrease in value (2 Ronald Anderson ties/developmentally neighborhoods experienced & John Nietupski disabled - increases) Wolch, Jennifer 1983/Oakland, CA/ 79 census tracts -sales price census - For residential facilities, & Stuart Gabriel service-dependent containing group tract decrease In value was populations homes and human - observed only In neighbor- service facilities hoods with a greater than 50% non-white population • K:SP-B.3 • '� ti . _ f �� ttl'M P d '$01,�i l;t-I 4,^',i c.. :;q a� <" a. rY , .... ,, _ si, ,. ... ;1I ,r,,t,-.),A.,,,,,44yd RENTC BUILDING & ZONING DEPA WENT ��Ca DEVEL �' a•Y,• }ENT APPLICATION REVDE' E,.{ ;4 ;- ' RAT ECF - 010 - 88 fig/ :1�60 .t_ APPLICATION NO(S) : REZONE : R-010-88 , CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT: CU-01�' PROPONENT : GOOD SHEPHERD OF WASHINGTON QFA)` PROJECT TITLE : GOOD SHEPHERD GROUP HOME BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION TO REZONE APPROX. 0. 85 ACRE OF PROPERTY FROM R-1 TO G-1 (DOWN ZONING) AND APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW A SIX RESIDENT, SIX BEDROOM GROUP HOME—FOR T LLY LOCATION : LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF N.E . 19th STREET AT THE 3900 DISABLED BLOCK BETWEEN UNION AVENUE N.E . AND SHELTON AVENUE N.E. TO : ® PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : ® ENGINEERING DIVISION F-1 TRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION 0 FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU R PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT E .BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT OPOLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT OOTH'ERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P .M. ON _Ng'► u 1 R 1gpR , REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : Parks and Recreation Department APPROVED F-1 APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS fl NOT APPROVED The group home has been designed to reflect the residential character of the neighborhood. Landscaping is abundant and has been used as a buffer where appropriate, i.e. ; to buffer the streetscape from the staff parking area. ---27 ;, __ DATE : VbeVCS7 / SIGNATU F DV OR OP `ITHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 2149N ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEE ;;7 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: iree�tenc� DATE CIRCULATED: MARCH 10, 1988 COMMENTS DUE: MARCH 18, 1988 EFC - 010 - 88 jt�/�� ,�������� APPLICATION NO(S). : REZONE: R-•010-88, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT.. C41- O""S'�-vd PROPONENT: GOOD SHEPHERD OF WASHINGITON PROJECT TITLE: GOOD SHEPHERD GROUP HOME BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION TO REZONE APPROXIMATELY 0.85 ACRE OF PROPERTY FROM R-1 TO G-1 (DOWN ZONING) AND APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW A SIX RESIDENT, SIX BEDROOM GROUP HOME FOR THE DEVELOPMENTALLY DISABLED. LOCATION: LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF N.E. 19th STREET AT THE 3900 BLOCK, BETWEEN UNION AVENUE N.E. AND SHELTON AVENUE N.E. SITE AREA: 0.85 ACRE BUILDING AREA (gross): 2,528 SQ. FT. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation / 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas we have expertise in and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. 74,e_cA Signature of Director Authorized Representative Dat RENT ? BUILDING & ZONING DEPQ. .PIdIENT • DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 010_ - 88 APPLICATION NO(S) : REZONE : R-010-88 , . CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT: CU-010-88 PROPONENT : GOOD SHEPHERD OF WASHINGTON • r. PROJECT TITLE : GOOILUEPHERD GROUP HOME BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION TO REZONE APPROX. 0. 85 ACRE OF . PROPFRTY FROM R-1 TO G-1 ' (DOWN ZONING) AND APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW A SIX RESIDENT, SIX BEDROOM GROUP HOME FOR THE DEVELUPMENTALLY LOCATION : LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF N.E . 19th STREET AT THE 3900 DISABLED BLOCK, BETWEEN' UNION AVENUE N.E . AND SHELTON AVENUE N.E. TO : [' PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : OENGINEERING DIVISION ® TRAFFIC ENG . DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : ® UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION , FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU ETPARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT El BUILDING, & ZONING DEPARTMENT 1111 POLICE DEPARTMENT • Eli POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 00THERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P .M. ON MARru 18, 'MIA REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIIVISION : f1R6 i'M ArfIoJ 514R.EAGL ® APPROVED V APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS n NOT .APPROVED Any development and/or construction shall comply with current Fire and Building Codes and Ordi- nances. ' . Fireppartment access roads/lanes shall be paved minimum width 20'; minimum height 13' 6". Yes_.__.. No Preliminary calcoe'ms show a fire flow of ;Soo is required, hydrants with a minimum flow of i90o .is required. >_ gpm each F'+imary hydrant is required to be within feet of the a structure.0 Secondary hydrants are required to be-within , ,ado •structure. feet of the An approved autornt tic sprinkler system is required to protect the total structure. Yes o All fire department access roads are to be paved and installed prior to construction. All fire hydrants are required to be installed and approved rior to construction. Yes No 'DATE: ; SIGN TURF OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE RD:NISION b'/1982 REQUIRCU FIRE FLOW CALCULATIONS 1. HAZARD IDETIFICATION INFORMATION r NAME e-)`:),® -__<",4,,egse'.421- a, b' 4's4,,,,,v2Cn A., U.B.C. CLASS OF BUILD ADDRESS.390c 8.i/1- .- At ,e'• /9 2:24 s77 FIRE MGMT AREA 2. DETERMINE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION - CLASS (CIRCLE ONE): I - II IV III V FIRE-RESISTIVE NON-COMBUSTIBLE ORDINARY WO (NOTE: IF "MIXED", SEE SPECIAL INSTRUCTION FOR AREA AND BASIC FIRE FLOW)D 3. DETERMINE AREA: GROUND FLOOR AREA: ,?-5-"Al FT2 (A) NUMBER OF STORIES: TOTAL BUILDING AREA: ,2 4. DETERMINE BASIC FIRE FLOW FROM TABLE 01, USING AREA (A): A� 5 GPM (B) 5. DETERMINE OCCUPANCY FACTOR ADJUSTMENT: ADJUSTMENT: " 3/A . .5 GPM CC) IF LOW HAZARD, SUBTRACT UP TO 25% OF (B): IF HIGH HAZARD0 ADD UP TO 25% OF (B) 6. COMPUTE SUB-TOTAL (B+C): CIF B+C IS LESS THAN 500 GPM, INSERT 500 GPM) 5'3 7, ..5-- GPM CD) 7. DETERMINE SPRINKLER ADJUSTMENT: ADJUSTMENT: GPM CE) CIF COMPLETELY SPRINKLERED, SUBTRACT UP TO 50% OF CD): IF LIGHT HAZARD OCCUPANCY AND FIRE RESISTIVE OR NON-COMBUSTIBLE CONSTRUCTION, SUBTRACT UP TO 75% OF CD). 8. DETERMINE EXPOSURE ADJUSTMENT: USING THE TABLE AT LEFT AS A GUIDE, ENTER THE SEPARATION AND ADJUSTMENT FOR EACH OF THE "FOUR FACES" OF THE BUILDING IN THE TABLE AT THE RIGHT: SEPARATION MAX. .ADJUSTMENT EXPOSURE SEPARATION ACT. ADJ. 0 - 10 25% MAX. NORTH 3d ADD R D % 11 - 30 20% MAX. EAST 7D ADD /D,_$ 31 - 60 15% MAX, 61 -100 1.0% MAX. WEST TH //O ADDADD /5 101 -150 5% MAX. TOTAL % OF ADJUSTMENT 150 OR 4-HR WALL 0% MAX. (NOT TO EXCEED 75%) : .ys- % (TOTAL % ADJUSTMENT TIMES CD) ADJUSTMENT: ,24 S17s GPM (F) 9. DETERMINE ROOF AND SIDING COVERING ADJUSTMENT: `• (IF SHINGLE COVERING, ADD 500 GPM) ADJUSTMENT: ^ --_ GPM CG) • 10. COMPUTE ESTIMATED FIRE FLOW REQUIRED: (IF D+E+F+G IS LESS THAN 500 GPM, INSERT 500 GPM) CIF D+E+F+G IS GREATER THAN 12,000 GPM, INSERT 12,(230GPM) /_? -3,,r (D+E+F+G) REQUIRED FIRE FLOW: /3 do GPM CH) • a II. SIGNED: , . ' �% e---e-..-®-® raTE ..rw�� /a. /Pic ,. 1;0 0 . 2149N ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET o'� REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Zorrtr,� 44 10 .. , O,,(, DATE CIRCULATED: MARCH 10, 1988 U ►,, COMMENTS DUE: MARL 188, $8 s EFC - 010 - 88 ®�� 88 APPLICATION NO(S). : REZONE: R-•010-88, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT: CU-010-88 04 PROPONENT: GOOD SHEPHERD OF WASHINGTON 0.66 PROJECT TITLE: GOOD SHEPHERD GROUP HOME BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION TO REZONE APPROXIMATELY 0.85 ACRE OF PROPERTY FROM R-1 TO G-1 (DOWN ZONING) AND APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW A SIX RESIDENT, SIX BEDROOM GROUP HOME FOR THE DEVELOPMENTALLY DISABLED. LOCATION: LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF N.E. 19th STREET AT THE 3900 BLOCK, BETWEEN -UNION AVENUE N.E. AND SHELTON AVENUE N.E. SITE AREA: 0.85 ACRE BUILDING AREA (gross): 2,528 SQ. FT. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health �( 8) Land and her-el4ne Use �C 9) Housing 10) - Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: o NR_E Ackyi PRvpo3p(ua �C� 8LP -0 8 F d�sl R \)0 1t) 1M 0 T sMt� © j. tt ' C27tkC 1NW KyeA GOuL.o ;at 1\x°f'Ntvc,eo P� v sI D m-K , 1 E PN-110 c cZv c5cK o/ 0 7'l4 j rr\pR..cu o i )D5ci pI IUD, The 31 -& 07144K i\J \) S°-/ reyv GIN& AOC b P(in)13 We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas we '\,, have expertise in and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. • (AnaSignature of 0 rector or Au+ rized Representative Date Form d RENT® car BUILDING & ZONING DEPA ENT �� vow DEVELtPMENT APPL!C:'41'0�t44� REVS 'i � o °ti ECF - 010 - 88 -1r0 Off, APPLICATION NO(S) : REZONE : R-010-88 , CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT: CU-010-88 ' PROPONENT : GOOD SHEPHERD OF WASHINGTON PROJECT TITLE : GOOD SHEPHERD GROUP HOME BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION TO REZONE APPROX. 0. 85 ACRE OF PROPERTY FROM R-1 TO G-1 (DOWN ZONING) AND APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW A SIX RESIDENT, SIX BEDROOM RO . LLY LOCATION : LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF N.E . 19th STREET AT THE 3900 DISABLED BLOCK BETWEEN UNION AVENUE N.E . AND SHELTON AVENUE N.E . TO : J7 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 0 ENGINEERING DIVISION ri TRAFFIC ENG . DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : LI UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION LI FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU n PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT rI, BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT LI POLICE DEPARTMENT POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P .M. ON MARrT 18 , 'MR • REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : 7 or )ir & 1i1l1SIC��' OAPPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS fl NOT APPROVED d Rt.colvvvI AvD tez.,ONI6FRQNn 6' 1 it R-1 uo 111-V PA R Ctz cT v. c.a \ krv-r ThL T l F rl CA D s 1- , , ( rt , MOIciRTYs�b mrac - O1cck ) 0 T U1t lros' `'cooliu6 Aza,omewouto P(PPRovi , ar= T CONOrlicK VG pit , TICGROjP Ibry s►-ttut 4 7t pLoiN i,N65 seems mlitweR, u,q1)02_517.4D ieCorerviEk;n (--4 k. POW-- IsT wI I Iul., Pl.` it oi, o o iv.c P• . -r /5)v g' Lisiitho.36Apitu& vou ttqour —ro1AL. 31- DATE : 3 3-65 DI E TOP OR ,AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE g/1982 CITY OF RENTON .. FECFVI• 2149N ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET MAR 5 1988 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: (-� A\c DATE CIRCULATED: MARCH 1 , 1988 COMMENTS D ILD! 17®O d%RgpT. EFC - 010 - 88 APPLICATION NO(S). : REZONE: R-•010-88, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT: CU-010-88 PROPONENT: GOOD SHEPHERD OF WASHINGTON PROJECT TITLE: GOOD SHEPHERD GROUP HOME BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION TO REZONE APPROXIMATELY 0.85 ACRE OF ' PROPERTY FROM R-1 TO G-1 (DOWN ZONING) AND APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW A SIX RESIDENT, SIX BEDROOM GROUP HOME FOR THE DEVELOPMENTALLY DISABLED. LOCATION: LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF N.E. 19th STREET AT THE 3900 BLOCK, BETWEEN UNION AVENUE N.E. AND SHELTON AVENUE N.E. SITE AREA: 0.85 ACRE BUILDING AREA (gross): 2,528 SQ. FT. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE r= MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants - 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: I i We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas we have expertise in and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional 'nf mation is needed to properly assess this proposal. ignat.urDirec or or A rized Representative Date Form 4 RENT(.a®, BUILDING & ZONING DEPA a 'ry. CBTY OF RENTON kr77:C /VFliet DEVELS PMENT APPLIC ` ON ECF — 010 — 88 APPLICATION NO(S) : REZONE : R—010-88 , CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT: CU-010-88 PROPONENT : GOOD SHEPHERD OF WASHINGTON PROJECT TITLE : GOOD SHEPHERD GROUP HOME BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION TO REZONE APPROX. 0. 85 ACRE OF PROPERTY FROM R-1 TO G-1 (DOWN ZONINGLAND APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW A SIX RESIDENT, SIX BEDROOM GROUP HOME FOR THE DEVELUPMENTALLY LOCATION : LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF N.E . 19th STREET AT THE 3900 DISABLED BLOCK. BETWEEN UNION AVENUE N.E . AND SHELTON AVENUE N.E . • TO : El PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : ENGINEERING DIVISION ri TRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : ri UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU LII PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT riBUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT 1OLICE DEPARTMENT El POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P .M. ON MARr.H 18 , 19RR REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : jiZIAPPROVED LI APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS F-1 NOT APPROVED • DATE : S SIGNATUR OF DIRECTOR OR AUTFORIZED a'FPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 FitCITY CF O RENToN � 2149N � ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET vet) REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: 4:1,- --vnel=jrlynfitzlj DATE CIRCULATED: MARCH 10, 1988 COMMENTS DURmLbI 2., 18,19�'48 EFC - 010 - 88 aN1-4" pEATd APPLICATION NO(S).: REZONE: R-•010-88, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT: CU-010-88 PROPONENT: GOOD SHEPHERD OF WASHINGTON PROJECT TITLE: GOOD SHEPHERD GROUP HOME BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION TO REZONE APPROXIMATELY 0.85 ACRE OF PROPERTY FROM R-1 TO .G-1 (DOWN ZONING) AND APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW A SIX RESIDENT, SIX BEDROOM GROUP HOME FOR THE DEVELOPMENTALLY DISABLED. LOCATION: LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF N.E. 19th STREET AT THE 3900 BLOCK, BETWEEN UNION AVENUE N.E. AND SHELTON AVENUE N.E. SITE AREA: 0.85 ACRE BUILDING AREA (gross): 2,528 SQ. FT. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation (/ 14) Transportation 15) Public Services I/7/- 16) Utilities " COMMENTS: • We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas we have expertise in and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. C Z3 / Signature dfi rector :r A thorized Representative- Date rn,-,;, A ( RENT. BUILDING & ZONING DEPi DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF — 010 — 88 APPLICATION NO(S) : REZONE : R-010-88 , CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT: CU—010-88 PROPONENT : GOOD SHEPHERD OF WASHINGTON • PROJECT TITLE : GOOD SHEPHERD GROUP HOME BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION TO REZONE APPROX. 0. 85 ACRE OF PROPERTY FROM R-1 TO G-1 (DOWN ZONING) AND APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW A SIX RESIDENT, SIX BEDROOM GROUP HOME FOR THE: DEVELUYMEN•1•ALLY LOCATION LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF N.E . 19th STREET AT THE 3900 DISABLED BLOCK. BETWEEN UNION AVENUE N.E . AND SHELTON AVENUE N.E. TO: fl PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : SENGINEERING DIVISION ® TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : ® UTILITIES ENG . DIVISION CITY cFENruN ® FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU RECEIvpc, fl.PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT r1l/.1R 1 8 1988 fl BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BUILDING/ZoN1NG DEPT. OPOLICE DEPARTMENT OPOLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT c LIOTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING, PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P.M. ON MARru 1R , 1gRR REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : fl APPROVED fl APPROVED WITH COND IONS NOT APPROVED 3//'��8 DATE: SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHNIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 rT l O ) 4II�I 2149N ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET '>'C REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: p vx;1cAtn CI P�� MARCH 10, 1988 COMMENTS DUE: MARCH+ 8,43 8` 'Ap DATE CIRCULATED: •1 ,% EFC - 010 - 88 APPLICATION NO(S). : REZONE: R-•010-88, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT: CU-010-88 PROPONENT: GOOD SHEPHERD OF WASHINGTON PROJECT TITLE: GOOD SHEPHERD GROUP HOME N'® ,A a BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION TO REZONE APPROXIMATELY 0.85 ACRE OF PROPERTY FROM, R-1 TO G-1 (DOWN ZONING) AND APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW A SIX RESIDENT, SIX BEDROOM GROUP HOME FOR THE DEVELOPMENTALLY DISABLED. LOCATION: LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF N.E. 19th STREET AT THE 3900 BLOCK, BETWEEN UNION AVENUE N.E. AND SHELTON AVENUE N.E. SITE AREA: 0.85 ACRE BUILDING AREA (gross): 2,528 SQ. FT. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas we have expertise in and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional i , tion is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signa-- ,of •Director 4r I horized 'Representative Date RENT(._ BUILDING & ZONING DEPAi. WENT 106, 1.00;A DEVELkPMENT APPL!CATION REVIEW; ieVp } `415�,. o ,�� ®' ti ECF - 010 - 88 • APPLICATION NO(S) : REZONE: R-010-88 , CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT: CU-010-88 % • A PROPONENT : GOOD SHEPHERD OF WASHINGTON • PROJECT TITLE : GOOD SHEPHERD GROUP HOME BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION TO REZONE APPROX. 0. 85 ACRE OF PROPERTY FROM R-1 TO G-L (DOWN ZONING) AND APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 10 ALLOW A SIX RESIDENT, SIX BEDROO G LLY LOCATION : LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF N.E. 19th STREET AT THE 3900 DISABLED BLOCK. BETWEEN UNION AVENUE N.E . AND SHELTON AVENUE N.E. TO: ® PUBLIC' WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : OENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION LI FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU ® PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT ISBUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT EEl POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 11111 OTHERS : • COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS -TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P.M. ON MARci4 1R, 19RR REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : 6 [' APPROVED El APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS flNOT APPROVED DATE: /57 SIGNATURE 0 ECTOR OR AUTH' TZED REPRESENTATIVE • REVISION 5/1982 2149N ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEE`r REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: (Aildltlfs DATE CIRCULATED: MARCH 10, 1988 COMMENTS DUE: ''':!; 1V398r' EFC - 010 - 88 14,te�ee" ' 414� ft glr� APPLICATION NO(S). : REZONE: R-•010-88, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT: CU-010- Vaj�.� PROPONENT: GOOD SHEPHERD OF WASHINGTON 4/0,4), PROJECT TITLE: GOOD SHEPHERD GROUP HOME BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION TO REZONE.APPROXIMATELY 0.85 ACRE OF PROPERTY FROM R-1 TO G-1 (DOWN ZONING) AND APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW A SIX RESIDENT, SIX BEDROOM GROUP HOME FOR THE DEVELOPMENTALLY DISABLED. ^ LOCATION: LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF N.E. 19th STREET AT THE 3900 BLOCK, BETWEEN UNION AVENUE N.E. AND SHELTON AVENUE N.E. SITE AREA: 0.85 ACRE BUILDING AREA (gross): 2,528 SQ. FT. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE , MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation • 14) Transportation 15) Public Services ✓ 16) Utilities COMMENTS: • We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas we have expertise in and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. 3//U /8•E' Signature of Director or Authorized Represe ative Date rm 4 .. . . .. 4) c RENTI.,o. BUILDING & ZONING I EPA ENT 4 0 :1.'' fi t �� k•.iP� V�DEVELOPMENT =i5. " PLIC.A,TI®N REV! v , ,ET,.19,1-, � 4. Cd ' '% 6k9 - . ECF - 010 - 88 APPLICATION NO(S) : REZONE : R-010-88 , . CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT: CU-010-88 PROPONENT ; GOOD SHEPHERD OF WASHINGTON • PROJECT TITLE : GOOD SHERHkRD GROUP HOME BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT~: APPLICATION TO REZONE APPROX. 0. 85 ACRE OF PROPRRTY FROM R-1 TO G-1 (DOWN ZONING) AND APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW A SIX RESIDENT, SIX BEDROOM GROUP HOME FOR THE uEvELurm NrALLY LOCATION : LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF N.E . 19th, STREET AT THE 3900 DISABLED BLOCK BETWEEN UNION AVENUE N.E . AND SHELTON AVENUE N.E. TO: ri PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : LI ENGINEERING DIVISION F-1 TRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : RUTILITIES ENG , DIVISION Eli FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT E .BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT ri POLICE DEPARTMENT Ti POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P .M, ON M,4Rr.H 18 , 19RR i REVIEWTNG DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : APPROVED MAPPROVED WITH CONDIT ONS ' ri OT APPROVED UTILITY APPROVAL SUBJECT TO I v LATE COMERS AGREEMENT-WATr&t LATE COMERS AGREEMENT-SEWER ®1 ' SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE-WATER . }/, ,g, "Q. X,3C., G O D Lf $4-41 . B . SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE-SEWERi y,, $,O¢/So,m- x ace,0- = ' l 440, p a / SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AREA CI,AGE-WATER JJj) 4I r O' q p l�` - SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AREA CHARGE-SEWER % ' y ,Oar' P�Tr= , . 0 , (iQorF APPROVED WATER PLAN! 1POno 13— MI- g3? e 'a APPROVED SEWER PLAN r .c S — aZ uv APPROVED FIRE HYDRANT LOCATIONS BY FIRE DEFT. I FIRE Ff. I f T9ALY MD i , . IOr* DATE: / i& o? SIGNATURE OF [, •ECTOr R. AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 130C% e wo 2149N ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET ' I REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: otkr_,//ii C trek r e POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPP�R11ViEI � MARCH 10, 1988 COMM S DUE: OF REtMARCH : �° DATE CIRCULATED. � MAR � ° � � �� � '� EFC - 010 - 88 �� `.g, dp La 'n �I APPLICATION NO(S). : REZONE: R-•010-88, CONDITIONAL US EIMO.. iui-u1 0i8 0 PROPONENT: GOOD SHEPHERD OF WASHINGTON .p PROJECT TITLE: GOOD SHEPHERD GROUP HOME BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION TO REZONE APPROXIMATELY 0.85 ACRE OF PROPERTY FROM R-1 TO G-1 (DOWN ZONING) AND APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW A SIX RESIDENT, SIX BEDROOM GROUP HOME FOR THE DEVELOPMENTALLY DISABLED. LOCATION: LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF N.E. 19th STREET AT THE 3900 BLOCK, BETWEEN UNION AVENUE N.E. AND SHELTON AVENUE N.E. SITE AREA: 0.85 ACRE BUILDING AREA (gross): 2,528 SQ. FT. ,IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE, MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: ti , • We ,have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas we have—expertise in and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature o/Di. f or Authori ed Representative Date R EN TL.,.. 'BUILDING & ZONING DEPA.,. . .WE1T N. 02 .4, --(440 DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION Fl ���� I � '- ai - Jam, �8 886t 0 ti UdW 64) ECF - O10 - 88 NO Ed JO Ai!i ��A APPLICATION NO(S) : REZONE: R-010-88 , CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT: CtJ-01O-808 PROPONENT : GOOD SHEPHERD OF WASHINGTON • PROJECT TITLE : GOOD SHEPHERD GROUP HONE BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION TO REZONE APPROX. 0. 85 ACRE OF PROPERTY FRAM R-1 TO G-1 +(DOWN ZONING) AND APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW A SIX RESIDENT, SIX BEDROOM GROUP HONE r LLY LOCATION : LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF N.E . 19th STREET AT THE 3900 DISABLED BLOCK BETWEEN UNION AVENUE N.E . AND SHELTON AVENUE N.E. TO : 0 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : EjENGINEERING DIVISION Fl TRAFFIC ENG . DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : F-1 UTILITIES ENG . DIVISION n FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT ® POLICE DEPARTMENT El POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT FlOTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P .M. ON MARrN 18 , 19RR REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : )2PPROVED [1 APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS r-1 NOT APPROVED. 24) /---- 41,44AAV —7 ,1/ IX.14.44.7 DATE : chi " c-- / `` SIGNATURE DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 2149N ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET `ji.k REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: � cp �'F c DATE CIRCULATED: MARCH 10' �, 1988 COMMENTS DUE: • ' RCH ; • °'t. _O1i EFC - 010 - 88 ‘744AN 4/0 `' ,9 eZ4t) APPLICATION NOS). : REZONE: R-•010-88, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT: CU-010-884Q 8? PROPONENT: GOOD SHEPHERD OF WASHINGTON C`a PROJECT TITLE: GOOD SHEPHERD GROUP HOME ®FAQ► BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION TO REZONE APPROXIMATELY 0.85 ACRE OF PROPERTY FROM R-1 TO G-1 (DOWN ZONING) AND APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW A SIX RESIDENT, SIX BEDROOM GROUP HOME FOR THE DEVELOPMENTALLY DISABLED. LOCATION: LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF N.E. 19th STREET AT THE 3900 BLOCK, BETWEEN UNION AVENUE N.E. AND SHELTON AVENUE N.E. SITE AREA: 0.85 ACRE BUILDING AREA (gross): 2,528 SQ. FT. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing a // 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation cam' 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation r/ 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: )6. Ty c91// e. ! ���� f i Gl �` ate•-� i �/ i�-� � p r"� �S to C/ e- /Gc-�2,, iytd', .P-ems Z L— Ce"---t-ct l--LCba-P, r S 9 vt ! d c cam. v-- We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas we have expertise in and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. `� ✓� , 1:41,LA/ /7 /,v g Signature of Director or A'thorized Representative Date Form 4 REN'TL___ BUILDING & ZONING DEPAU, o'MENT DEVEL• PMENT APPLUC .T@6N EV1E', SHEET ECF - 010 - 88 APPLICATION NO(S) : REZONE : R-010-88 , . CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT: CU-010-88 PROPONENT : GOOD SHEPHERD OF WASHINGTON • PROJECT TITLE : GOOD SHEPHERD GROUP HOME BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION TO REZONE APPROX. 0. 85 ACRE OF PROPERTY FROM R-1 TO G-1 (DOWN ZONING) AND APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW A SIX RESIDENT, SIX BEDROOM GI CS . LLY LOCATION : LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF N.E. 19th STREET AT THE 3900 DISABLED BLOCK, BETWEEN UNION AVENUE N.E . AND SHELTON AVENUE N.E. TO: ® PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : Elli ENGINEERING DIVISION ITRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : ® UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION [I] FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU CITY CF RENTON ® PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT RECEIVED t rj BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT MAR 181988 n POLICE DEPARTMENT UILDING/ZONING DEP'r El POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ® OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P .M. ON MA11- 1R, 19RR REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : 7 ,e/2/=/=/C n APPROVED [1 APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS 6/ NOT APPROVED �D JzYDu/ cd e S e� 7G /3 5 f-2 C 1 '-a s 71-0--1-, ZD Jr /4.�-��;a--r /r- n� Srn �.^- d -rii� ?.G� e .�`e.2 4 -�i'1/ J" 3 s `3e-ef7) P' �} DATE: i ) c SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHOR'ZE'- REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 J t :f Pr GOOD SHEPHERD OF WASHINGTON 18940 MARINE VIEW DR. SW SEATTLE, WA 98166 Phone 243-2895 February 27, 1988 GSW-011-1 Donald Erickson, Zoning Administrator Building and Zoning Department City of Renton Municipal Building 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98005 RE: Re-zone of Property on 3900 Block of N. E. 19th Street . Dear Mr. Erickson: Here is an additional Exhibit 17, RE-ZONE JUSTIFICATION, and an updated TABLE OF CONTENTS to the re-zone package submitted on Febu- rary 24, 1988. Please add this information to all the copies pro- vided . The above additional information was requested by Jerry Lind on Feb- ruary 24 , 1988 in his intitial review of the package. Any questions may be addressed to Darlene Lang on 243-7044, or the undersigned on 657-1392 (8:00 AM to 4:30 PM) and 243-2895 evenings . Sincerely,' , fe-viiell / Edward R. Stanley President Tn) i [7: MAR 04198B LI! CLAWING/ZONING DEPT. !!/1 CITY OF i4,";J'"•0:1 r; FEB 2 41988 ',1 II GOOD SHEPHERD OF WASHINGTON BUILDING/ZONING DEPT.18940 MARINE VIEW DR. SW SEATTLE, WA 98166 Phone 243-2895 February 23 , 1988 Donald Erickson, Zoning Administrator Building and Zoning Department City of Renton Municipal Building 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98005 RE: Re-zone of Property on N. E. 19th St . between Union and Shelton. Dear Mr. Erickson : Submitted herein is the data required for re-zoning and obtaining a conditional use permit that will enable Good Shepherd of Washington to build a Group Home for mentally retarded/developmentally disabled young adults . This project has the support of the Federal Govern- ment thru the Department of Housing and Urban Development as an approved capital loan under the 202 Housing Program, reference 127-EH125. In addition, the State of Washington thru the Division of Developmental Disabilities has authorized funds to provide the operational dollars to operate the Group Home when it is completed . We would appreciate that the appropriate action be taken in an expedited manner and that this request be processed in the minimum legal time period . We are ready to support any reviews that may be required. Any questions may be addressed to Darlene Lang on 243-7044 , or the undersigned on 657-1392 (8 : 00 AM to 4 : 30 PM) and 243-2895 evenings . Sincerely, Edward R. Stanle President �1 _r..,, .T . .:�Y. oe. - .TY OF RENTO FILE NO(S): �_�„�_ � `. �z.® ♦ BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT 0 u-on- 8 ANT° MASTER APPLICATION NOTE TO APPLICANT: Since this is a comprehensive application form, only those items related to your specific type of application(s) ore to be completed. (Please print or type. Attoch additional sheets if necessary.) APPLICANT I I TYPE OF APPLICATION • NAME FEES Good Shepherd of Washington REZONE*(FROM R-1 TO G-1) 308.47 ADDRESS • 0 SPECIAL PERMIT* _ 18940 Marine View Dr. SW CITY ZIP El ,TEMPORARY PERMIT* Seattle, WA 98166 171 CONDTnONM. IIS WWI* 308.47 0 TELEPHONE SITE PLAN APPROVAL ED SPECIAL PERMIT FOR GRADE AND FILL 2 4 3-2 8 9 5 No. of Cubic Yards: CONTACT PERSON 0 VARIANCE* . From Section: NAME * Justification Required ' Darlene Lang-. ' . _ -- - - • ' ADDRESS ' SUBDIVISIONS: '{ .4751 So.u_th 1172nd .Place 0 SHORT PLAT CITY ZIP 0 TENTATIVE PLAT Seattle, WA 98166 0 PRELIMINARY PLAT TELEPHONE 0 FINAL PLAT 2 4 3-7 0 4 4 [] WAIVER (Justification'Required) OWNER NO. OF LOTS: NAME PLAT NAME: Howard R. Kienle DDorcc PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: y + —zM 732 Melody Lane 0 PRELIMINARY CITY ZIP 0 FINAL • Enumclaw, WA 98022 P.U.D. NAME: - . _ _ __ __, _ __ ___- - TELEPHONE 8 2 5-2 6 51 0 Residential 0 Industrial 0 Commercial 0 Mixed LOCATION MOBILE HOME PARKS: :17 -f.E AD 0 TENTATIVE I ESK.E. 19th Renton EXISTING USE ( PRESENT\ZONING PRELIMINARY Vacant - R-1 FINAL PROPOSED USE PARK NAME: • Group Home for Developmental NUMBER OF SPACES: 4i/60,f i_ Li i- Lrej y V C . Disabled Adults . 111 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE • '-6z2- SQ. FT. ACRES . ' TOTAL FEES 679.44 _mo AREA: 36, 000 .847 .'°;..Y q.:: .,;-1 'Ku T�1P. USE ONLY -- ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESSING y l '"-' ST1MP F— APPLICATION mcLcJ V ED B v: .`�,',�' � c; vEg c� 1�J6 • APPLa TION DETERMINED TO BE:U IA ���✓ ' r . .y, 'r ' Accepted ' '"' B tL i,,, ,l .!,.Ja�aau�.1 �. �° Q Incomplete Notification Sent On_ "o CC,,, 'By: •�•, (Initials) DATE ROUTED ADDITIONAL MATERIAL RECEIVED BY: �.; _ APPL CATION DETERMINED TO BE: ?J' "04'S8 l3I'o �Sb Accepted 0 Incomplete Notification Sent On By: (Initials) ROUTED TO: 1 0 Building 0 Design Eng. 0 Fire 0 Parks 0 Police 0 Policy Dev. 0 Traffic Eng. 0 Utilities REVISED 1-31-84 A Legal description of property (if more space is required, attach a separate sheet). See Exhibit 1 AFFIDAVIT 1, !: Darlene Lang_ , being duly sworn, declare that I am authorized representative to act for the property owner,®owner of the property involved in this appiication and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained aria Inc information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS DAY OF 40 V 19 07 . NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, RESIDING AT 1/41e5 - s7:57 -e C (-24 (Name of Notary Public) (Signature of Owner) /I /✓ 7'5 2- (Ad ess) (Address) (City) (State) (Zip) 6 37 (Telephone) Acceptance of this application and required filing fee does not constitute a complete application. Plans and other materials required to constitute a complete application are listed in the "Application Procedure." 1 Form #174 MASTER APPLICATION, Exhibit 1 Legal Description of. pro.perty on N.E. 19th Street, between Union and Shelton. . , That portion of the southeast quarter of the northeast, quarter of the southeast Section 4 , Township 23 north, Range S .East; .W.M. , in King County, Washington, described as, follows : . - Beginning at -the northeast corner of said subdivision; Thence along the north line. thereof north -88°14 '32".west 30. 003 . feet; Thence parallel with the east line'.of said subdivision south 0° . 58'58" west 30 .,003 'feet to a point on the westerly right- of way of 132nd Avenue Southwest and the true point of- beginning; "Thence continuing 'south 0°58 ' 58" west 195. 879 feet to point north 0° • - : 58158" east 430 .40 feet north of the south line of said subdivision; Thence north 89°26 ' 59" west 120- feet; . Thence north 0°58 '58" east 38. 409; Thence north 88°14 '32" west 210 feet; . . - , Thence south '0°58 ' S8" west 10 feet; - Thence north 88°14'32" west 20 feet; - Thence north 0°58'58" east 170 feet to the south line of the north 30 feet of said subdivision; Thence south 88°14 '32" east along said . south line 350 ,feet to the -true point of- beginning; Except that portion as conveyed to Kampe Development Corporation by ', instrument recorded- under Recording No. $496982: cif v or rls1 ) .. ..� - . @ r[!N l 11 v'fl ' ' 11 J 5EB 2 4198B • - BUILDING/ZONING DEPT. , --... ,--• . _. ,...,_ EXHIBIT 17 Page 1 Pf. 1 .” RE-ZONE JUSTIFICATION GOOD SHEPHERD QQUF? HOME 900 PLQQK OF 19TH STREET Thies re-zone is required because Renton City Zoning Codes stipulate that group homes must be developed in areas which are zoned 0-4. - This lot is in a R71 Zone. According to the COMPrOPnive Plan a-4- fand qr,1 zones are compatible and co-exist harmoniously thrOPWh out the City of Renton. The City of Renton comprehensive Plan supports ropp hoMP dPv, ] c4D- ment by having the following residential goals : ( 1 ) "to encourage suitable housing and living environments" for handicapppd, (2) "group homes shOuld be dispersed throughout the city" This group home will provide suitable hOPPing anand 1iVing env .rqn- nets for six developmentally diPa010/Mentaj,1Y retarded indiyidyaiP who require 24 hour a day supervision. Currently there are no grogp homes to serve developmentally clP- pbled/mentplly retarded individuals within the City limits of lien911 - . • Group home development is crucial to providing residential services for developmentally di4Pled/mentO4Y retarded j7ndivi0140.s . Ac99r0- jng to the ..State Division Developmental pippbilitipp' there pre: cur- rently over 500 personS. in King County in need of speciplie0- h.914s- ing. The onset of de,inptitionpliption over 25 Year ago has been the contributing factor . Many parents have been caring for their handicppped children at home, however these parents ax-, aging many are single parents) and are no longer able to provide that Care. safe living environment must be available those individuals Who are least able to provide for themPelve . . . ( / CITY OF FI:14-i-M - - -1 ] MAR 0 4 1988 . •13U1WING/Z01' qiNG DL,..7- 0 [47Q16 . . ! • ' . ' ' ' ,' , ' , . , , TABLE OF OONTFNT4 GOOD SHEPHERD GROUP HOME 1-9TH STREET RE-4QNF & CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT , ,„ • . _ • . - - • " READ FOR RFOP FQR COITION-AL ITEM SUBJECT REoNE USE PERMIT SECT , , , MASTER APPLICATION X X EXHIBIT 1 1.,AQA1„. DESCRIPTION X X 2 gXNP;T. 2 QUIT CLAM PFEI? X X EXHIBIT 3 TITLE INSURANCE X X 4 EXHIBIT 4 FNvIR0NMFNTAL PK LIST X X S EXHIBIT 5 SITE EN X EXHIBIT 6 ARCHITECTURAL X 7 • FI.FVATIQN-: PW95 EXHIBIT 7 RFPPPgP 5I•Tg P4AN X EXHIBIT 8 PROJECT DESCRIPTION X : X 9 EXHIBIT 9 PQLIPY. ANA4YSIS X ' X 10 ' PAPER # 11 EXHIBIT 10 PRINQFTQN 5TPDY X X11 PTD .1,1- P-P? EXHIBIT 11 PRTNPFTQN STUDY X X DTP 8-31-78 EXHIBIT12 UNIV. oF PAYTON thTpDY' X X PIPIT 5TATE vN:Tv. op N,y. X , 14 5TPPY Exl-upTT 14 K.C. 4ssgsSop MAP- ExHT4ITT 15 AREA MAP X X 16 EXHIBIT 16 SIGNATURES IN SUPPORT X , 17 OF THE PROJECT CITY OF RI7NTO:1 EXHIBIT 17 zONE jg§TTpTqATTQN X D 1ft Ii• esw,p1R MAR 0 4 198P •Bott,o1NGq0N.ING L OF RE7 BIT 4 ( 10 Pages ) . �,� � ECF: EU-013 If LU: $% o z City of RentonCu b�� , .45 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST 0,9gT fO SEP-T°4' Purpose of Checklist: The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43,21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for allproposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. Instructions for Applicants: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply." Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impacts. Use of Checklist for Nonproject Proposals: (Please Type or Print Legibly) Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D). For nonproject actions (actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs), the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Good Shepherd Group Home 2. Name of applicant: Good Shepherd of Washington 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: 18940 Marine View Dr. SW Seattle, WA 98166 Contact; ' Ed Stanley ( 243 -2895 ) 4. bate cCiecklist prepare`: or Darlene Lang ( 243-7044 ) S. Agency requesting checklist: Building and Zoning Department 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): CITY OF Fc-N T 0:I WAR 0 41983 BU:L D!NG/iC:\.: .G nEPT. 7. Do you have any pl, for future additions, expansions, urther activity related to or connected with this proposal? if yes, explain. Yes - Future Addition, Carport 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. None j 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. • No � I 10. List any governmental approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. All permits associated with new construction. I ' 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. This project is six resident, six bedroom Group Home for the developmentally disabled. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topography map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. South side of N.E. 19th St. between Union and Shelton . B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. EARTH a. General description of the site (circle one); rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? "3%)/ c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, caly, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. Sand and gravel (assumed) d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. No - 2 - i e. Describe th urpose, type, and approximate qt ities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. , , We will have a balanced cut and fill for the building pad. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. Some erosion may occur during construction. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? 16.6% h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: Temporary erosion control will be installed during construction. 2. AIR a. What.types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Vehicular emissions normal to 4 vehicles will be generated. b. Are there any off-site sources of emission? No c. P,ffroposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, None' 3. WATER a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. No 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. No 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. N/A - 3 - 4) Will the prat, l :al require surface water withdrar ; or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximately quantities if known. No • 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. No 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No b. Ground: I ' 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground , water? Give general description, purpose, and appaoximately quantities if known. No 1 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals . . .; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. N/A c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. Storm water will be discharged on site. (under ground) 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. No - 4 - d. Proposed mr fires to reduce or control surface, _und, and runoff water impacts, if any: Drywell will be installed. 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: o deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other o evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other o Shrubs o grass o crop or grain o Wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other o water plants: water lily, eel grass, milfoil, other o other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: The site will be landscapped. 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: Birds: Hawk, heron, eagle�ongbirds other Mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other mice Fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other None b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. No c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. No - 5 - d. Proposed me res to preserve or enhance wildlife any: None . 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Electric and Gas Heating. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: Building Insulation, R-19 Walls and R-38 Ceilings. 7. t Environmental Health I ' a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. No 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. Medical services may be required by residents, not by this project . 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if e b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation. other)? Normal vehicular noise. - 6 - i i • r 2) What types _ levels of noise would be created I it associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Short term noise during construction will occur, 7:00 AM - 4 :00 PM. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: None 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Vacant, residential b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. Not Known. c. Describe any structures on the site. None d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? N/A e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? R-1 f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? R-1 g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? N/A h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. No i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? Six residents and four workers. j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: N/A - 7 - 1. Proposed m aires to ensure the proposal is cor ible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: Residential in a residential area. 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. six, low income. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. None i c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: None 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed. 16 feet . b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None � I c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: Land scapping. 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? Light and glare will be that is normal to a residence. I .I b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: None - 8 - i I A . Y 12. Recreation • a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? None b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: None 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. No b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence. of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. No c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: No 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. Access fron Union Ave NE b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximately distance to the nearest transit stop? ;.I25 feet.____ c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? Completed project will have 4 parking spaces. No parking spaces are eliminated. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). 19th Street NE will be widened in front of the property. - 9 - e. Will the pra use (or occur in the immediate pity of) water, rail, or ' ` , air transportation? If so, generally describe. No f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. 12 to 13 trips per day g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: None 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. Yes, nominal increase in municipal service normal to construction. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. Fire alarm system. 16. Utilities a. Circle utilities currentl available at the site: Zelectricity) natural gas, w ater, refuse service, telephone, sane ary sewer, septic system, other. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. II All of 16.a. I � I � C. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Proponent: Name Printed: Edward R. Stanley ' I - 10 - • I ' #176 11-8-84 , iYOFrt. .._._.. EXHIBIT 8 , GSW-004 FEB 1 ) Page 1 of 5 GOOD SHEPHERD GROUP HOME DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT Good Shepherd of Washington, a non-profit corporation of the State of Washington, formed by parents/guardians of mentally retarded- developmentally disabled young adults , is planning to build a Group Home (wood frame construction) for six developmentally disabled adults on a site on the south side of N.E . 19th Street, between Union and Shelton Avenues NE (Sierra Terrace Div. No . 1 , Vol . 76-53/54 Parcel No . 2 , (36 ,200 square feet) . The Group Home we are planning is 2528 square foot rambler with 6 bedrooms , kitchen, dining room, living room, laundry room, two and one half baths , and a small office for the staff . The facilities will be wheel chair accessible with 36 inch doors and hand rails in bathrooms . The hallways will have exit doors so that in case of fire there are alternate exits . In addition, the bedrooms will be separated from the living/dining area with automatic fire door . The facilities will be staffed 24 hours a day., seven days a week . The residents will be mentally retarded/developmentally disabled and will need help in their every day activities , such as dressing, eating and bathing. In addition, the staff will develop special training program\ in order to train the residents to live as indepen- , dently as possible. The following criteria will be used in the selection of residents : a. The entry age will be 21 minimum and 40 maximum. There will be no maximum age for residents . b. Mentally retarded that require 24 hour a day supervision. c. May have limited communication skills . d . No chronic medical problems requiring nursing care. Residents will be able to participate in training programs for self med- ication . e. May use prosthetic device for ambulation, i .e. , wheelchair or walker , or have abnormal gait that require special service . f . May need assistance with eating, dressing, bathing and toilet- ing but will be in training programs (in home) to become more independent in those areas . g. Residents will reflect homogeneity of learning needs and developmental functions . h. Priority will be given to South King County/Renton residents currently living in the community. i . Either' sex, both sexes will reside in the home. EXHIBIT 8, GSW-004 Page 2 of 5 DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT (Continued) When the group home is complete it will be operated by Good Shepherd Lutheran Home of the West (GSLH) a non-profit corporation, incorpor- ated in California . It was formed in 1955 by members of the Luth- eran Church, who were parents of handicapped children. GSLH is an independent corporation with a Board of Directors and is not under the control of the Lutheran Church. Members of GSLH organization are Lutherans and the Lutheran Church membership is a source for fund raising, manpower, information and general support . Good Shepherd Lutheran Home of the West , has been serving the devel- opmental disabled for over 30 years and operates facilities in Ari- zona , California , Colorado and Oregon. They will also operate the other home, we are building, in the City of Renton.. The organiza- tion has the commitment to provide the highest quality of service possible and in it ' s 30 year history never closed a facility for lack of funds . Good Shepherd does not discriminate to whom it pro- vides service. There is no requirement for employees of GSLH to be Lutherans . The Good Shepherd Lutheran Home of the West is supported by many families , churches members , a 12 , 000 member auxiliary, a foundation with assets of over 6 million dollars and many individuals that feel the organization is worthy of their support . NEED FOR THE FACILITY The need for this type of housing is so great that current State Division of Developmental Disabilities figures show that over 500 persons in King County are in need of specialized housing. The trend in recent years has been to keep the mentally retarded/ developmentally disabled person the community. Many parents have been caring for their handicapped children at home, however, these parents are getting old and are no longer able to care for their children. In addition, the population in the institutions , such as Fircrest and Rainier, where the handicapped are being cared for , are being reduced and these people are being returned to the community . To further compound the problem, the development of these type of housing involves the cooperation of so many government agencies that very few organizations are willing to spend the time to coordinate such a complex effort . We are appreciative of the support and the cooperation we have received from government officials of the City of Renton. We would like to maintain the spirit of cooperation and we intend to do all we can to ensure it continues . EFFECT ON ADJACENT PROPERTIES There will be not any adverse effects on adjacent properties . The Group Home will occupy 7. 0% of the land which is less than one half of the 15% permitted by the code. The yard will be landscapped and the building will be a rambler, no higher than any other building in the area . This project has neighborhood support, see Exhibit 16 . EXHIBIT 8 , GSW-004 Page 3 of 5 COMPATIBILITY The Group Home planned will be compatible with the neighborhood , and will be a permanent home for the residents . Under the HUD 202 Loan Program, HUD will provide the funds to build and maintain the building. The loan is for 40 years and under the requirements of the HUD 202 Program the building can only be used as a group home for mentally retarded/developmentally disabled . In addition, 19th street will be widened to full two lanes , sidewalks , curbs and gutters will be added from the property to Union street . These off-site improvements will be accomplished under the Renton Block Grant . The City of Renton Comprehensive Plan encourages group home develop- ment by having the following as residential goals : ( 1 ) "To encourage suitable housing and living environments" for the handicapped , and (2) "Group homes should be dispersed throughout the City" . Cur- rently, there are no group homes for the developmental disabled in the City of Renton. Under Renton City Group Home zoning requirements the property must be re-zoned from R-1 to G-1 . The G-1 is low density requiring a minimum lot size of 35 , 000 square feet, and is compatible with the R-1 zone. A Conditional Land Use Permit is also required . Included here are the following studies that show that property values or property sales are not impacted in near or long tern by the place- ment of a group home for the developmentally disabled in a neighbor- hood . EXHIBIT 9: Policy Analysis Paper #11 , Minnesota Governor ' s Planning Council on Developmental Disabilities , dated July 1 , 1982. EXHIBIT 10 : Princeton University Study dated November 30 , 1982 , (New York State Properties) EXHIBIT 11 : Princeton University Study dated August 31 , 1978 , (New York State Properties) EXHIBIT 12 : University of Dayton Study dated March 1981 (Ohio State Properties) EXHIBIT 13 : State University of New York , dated August 1980 (Northeastern Cities and Adjoining Towns) The State Division of Developmental Disabilities and the King• County Board for Developmental Disabilities which approve group homes sites , has approved this site for a group home. They require that group homes be located in residential areas near shopping centers , medical services and METRO Transit stops . EXHIBIT 8, GSW-004 Page 4 of 5 PARKING Four parking stalls will be provided on site and will be used as follows : 1 . Two stalls will be used the for staff personnel at the home mornings and evenings . 2 . The third stall by the vehicle that is associated it the group home. 3. The fourth stall will be used during changes in shifts and visitors . TRAFFIC The increase traffic will be minimal in the neighborhood, the resi- dents will not have cars . The only traffic will be the staff coming and going and visitors . The following is a summary of 12 trips per typical day and two trips 1 time per week : 1 . 6 :30 AM day-shift staff member # 1 arrives . 2 . 7 : 00 AM day-shift staff member # 2 arrives . 3 . 7 : 00 AM grave-yard shift member # 3 leaves . 4 . 9:30 AM day-shift staff member #1 leaves . 5. 10 : 00 AM day-shift staff member # 2 leaves . 6 . 3 : 00 PM swing-shift staff member # 4 arrives . 7. 4: 00 PM swing-shift staff member # 5 arrives . 8 . 3: 30 PM Manager for all the Group Homes arrives . 9. 4:30 PM Manager for all the Group Homes leaves . 10 . 8: 00 PM swing-shift staff member # 4 leaves . 11 . 11 : 00 PM grave-yard shift member # 3 arrives . 12 . 11 : 15 AM swing-shift staff member # 5 leaves . 13. Staff member goes on shopping trip ( 1 time per week) . 14 . Staff member returns from a shopping trip ( 1 time per week) . Note: The above lists the minimum trips , additional trips will be generated' by visitors , estimated to be approximately 12 additional trips per week. If required , the above hourly schedule will be adjusted to meet resident Day Program requirements . EXHIBIT B , GSW-004 Page 5 of 5 NOISE , GLARE The increase in noise will be due to vehicular noise. The light and glare will be due to what is normal to a residence. LANDSCAPING The grounds will be landscapped, see site plan. ACCESSORY USES None JI �� v c i cif 1, ;`� 38 ST if. ; a i 37 lrlik 1988 NI 36 ST ST---.4 SE 88 ST 1 sF \ 444 m� r N 35 ST, I .•Y>LST , N 34 a', ST ' EPA Si-- SST d INGIZ0NIP!G �;� N 33 PL J Ci 41\41 Creek aUllD N 33 ST Renton`-• E 91 ST `ark . • , N 32STST o > N -31 ST a � �� Colmann Point m+ N Q' 30 ST _ .may. - SE 9� r 9 -1 jN N 28 5 95 PL .k...,&2:\N i P N 28 ST ?'°NE I `'� . •rra Heigh H �� -..ra""°'�°` : 96 PI ennyd • ,, r . v ), V t C 2,p w t�µ w w $E.96S .i Z tair....-7 e c!ti NE 24 ST S " .� 1� SE 101 ST NE?.ST / NE 24ST i Z �'•11�a7k j 1 1tI r NE 2J T i. SE 1 Za • i2� G PINEHarrtn ton T' 0 ,A ` •f NE i22 ST PI NE 9 •F SE 103 3Y ST O• c� N` V K\aPe' ^ ��- r L 20 S NE20ST c• 4 • - r s �, ? iksaleN NE 20 ST I = o NE. O.y .7. NE 19 P"Z < 18 ST S 1'' 3 4'It .� �`Al NE 19 ST ' { \ w 1T �c� NE 18 , - 17 PL �' `1 c v P �1 ' E15ST \ 1 a 4 a ®Ya' E 16 U wT 6 Z :SPL N 17S NE17ST� 5 _ W z NEB jE1Aw 900Ii w !eNE'. tST o ■ Z �o• •� �F o r \ � tiE , Sz - LI rJ ,Z ••I..•.�� Park • m a � 1 � NE„I c® _, w „ r v1 .NE 10 PL ST H, lik ••NE 10 PL ! NE 10 0 CT 1 'Cirri 0 y' ...4'.......:...;:., THE BOEING COMPANY ,� � �, i,.�+ , Mil T 5,,, INDUSTRIAL AREA NE 10 4 r v r' ' / v a N NE NE 10 ST Mt •• `,\ J �� J NE 9 PLW 11 NE 9 PL Q > ST ` ;L: = v �'' �I NE 9ST N6:0S ' :: , N _N 8 • S t .. C, 1E8• '~ • y rSCt... SE > .. —, c/till 17777,- t.:. C ' # o �ltrat . 75 II l I Z a `` Z�ti -• NE 7 PLC O I M Jj G ' �I • RENTON•: 1. ian •., kV c ? -®. • • • N yE - Y ®Q5T1 'r F`NW6S MUNICIPAL . , _— I ` 711 ° IL .• > y NW T •• ` 1111111111r z CAR a '� a p1 c s. Highlands c �5 S •y- t y NE 5 CT o• _. AIRPORT ` . F0UNDR1f W�v . `� E r ` 1• _s = O �9 7.1 • 1111111 � ' `1'0• erndel. * c - `sue I 7 .-.EEg VL. .veN'al' . y NE l ' . ' 1aT• �'�© Z IIIIIN,��E �z s Co GREENWOOD CEMETERY - ` W pi �l :j _ 3 le '1' puaK 3 • GROUP + . 3 1, ••• HEALTH CLINK 3 wo.ke ?'!...• -�p� �'o•• District Court SE 132 ST = NW 2P I i .r We•.• •::•� iine) NE Shope c ,it F+ sjupc N 2 ST • , ��tt,NW 2 ST � �. W© W dEE132PL �.o z 1+• Igor . •.6 V4,.. ? g. ° Q ! O NE 1 'L 'Z o 5.•yietOrs 4 RENTON HIGH 4. IPER: _. •• e - v _• SCHOOL i- �' :'Ceve ,y MT. OLIVET Iong anunryRallon E L36 ?s ._Lu- R,ver ,4*, CEMETERY Transfer s,auonr� ` ` EXiTPARk 10 \a • 1_7 . SUNNYDA E , dWE P, `tt,\ s 3 Rd 1[1111111111111 -17 Rose o.d Dr < r� 1 S S ,millfia L IleC10111110$'1111 ' Ill \'''''4- N RENTecd ��m .^SH0P'IN8 ' ® P°� •al '� 1]y'^••"4 CENTER. s. N �... - , SE , r' S S6ST ST �* Y - it En, «S ' 6 �ESThp SE HAPLE11000 ,y ♦ er, GOLF COURSE .�rr7 , Ed O� fri. Q RLINGTON=� o INDUSTRIAL - •' D AREA I S10ST� c.Phu ' � REN TON VILLAGE 9 ',old',oldPOWER SUB-STATION .t��la Maplew. . -, S SHOPPING CENTER PARK . c. • EXIT �' illsu � ae+ J. 5 \,® 7 s 4 e c w �Yd1 y4`4P. \ '1 S 1 ST mc" pun6 pt. ` Q T3 n n �c U SE 18 PI 4i ays w 19 , < I. S 1-6 ST % '",e c °' "y' Boa ] es E > m r ¢' a oAir • G '3 cod `0+ S Y « N S 17 ST 1 SE 18' 4 N• -A. 40 o'17'4 '..P S<,( �'T 7 <17 4. N S 19 S 18 S NT KG SE,cK _'�' .��c �?G� � �+: SF, b��irk 'd Way % (�F �G�y P. P x`a� •a , o SE S , SE y� 0 Et Talbo i i D• • Qy W SEE 1 Pt c1 ;worn - A._.,. - S22CT4`S.„P,S T v SE 21 T •.•.o'�y���M �[-^' TE _ 9 ST £ E -j c s� S 1.. •L V. 'sb ah .E159PL Fair. ST 60 Ave SE p , Sy3ST; • CAS NELSON f-i S. .1 PL o; 1600. .SE 180P awl SW 23 ST dorsa. r NMI::: SE 1.• ST u SE 161 " Wila us E �I p $ d SCHOOL .' •,,, ' m L '4�—�i' 3,....•� 5 SE 163 ST a S N 1E1 1_4a a> 4. Y 6!a a �� d SE 164 rn' v N N a . i ~ • ° !® N C•SCade SE 165 ST To' �^1 a SE 164 ST SESE FE r63 6T S28S 26 �� 6 % m , w rn �� S;4-t. L 0 c a.ti 0 rl KEGS'“` UAY E) _3IT 2 ( 1 Page ) I(ING i:Ullhll'i • 1, `8F� i.Ht) I KM lAX NaU 11 (11)v 181916 fB t I}1 ;� l. ; tl` E WHEN RECORDED RETURN TO: Warren & Kellogg , P. S . 86..'1 1 :1' - 3k t 1 _ i Attorneys at Law . `'ECD F r'.,nrl P. O . Box 626 l_i4cI•1S1_ :+:.,::,:*r.. 00 Renton , WA 98051 QUIT CLAIM DEED DON VAN PARYS , a single person , in lieu of foreclosure of Deed of Trust convey and quit claim to hOWARD R . KIENLE and DORA J . KIENLE , husband and wire , the following . described real estate , situated in King County , State of Washington , togetherwith all after acquired title of the Grantor(s ) therein : That portion of the southeast quarter of the northeast quarter of the southeast quarter of Section 4 , Township 23 north , Range 5 East , W . M . , in King County , Washington , described as follows : Beginning at the northeast corner of said subcpision ;. thence along the north line thereof north 88 114 ' 32" west 30. 003 feet; thence sarallel with the east line of said subdivision south 0 58 ' 58" west 30 .003 feet to a point on the westerly right of way line of 132nd• Ave . Southeast and the true point of beginning ; thence continuing south 0° 58158" west 195 . 879 feet to point north 0°58 ' 58" east 430 . 40 feet north of the south line of said subdivision ; thence north 8,2°26 ' 59" west 120 feet ; 'thence north 0 58 '58"—east 38. 409 feet; thence north 88°14 ' 32" west 210 feet ; -- thence south 0°58 ' 58" west 10 feet; thence north 88° 14 ' 32" west 20 feet ; • thence north 0° 58 ' 58" east 170 feet to the south line of the north 30 feet of said subdivision ; thence south 88° 14 ' 32" east along said south line 350 feet to the true point of beginning; Except that portion• as conveyed to Kam•pe Development Corporation by instrument recorded under Recording No . 6496982 . Dated : Novelplt F r,/N,;.oy 1986 . it Li 1' 4 _ Y Don Van Parys /6' .i�r FEB 24198B QUIT CLAIM DEEIPUILDING/ZONING DEPT. Eli IT 3 ( 13 Pages ) STEWART TITLE COMPANY OF WASHINGTON, INC. 1000 Second Avenue, Suite 1300 Seattle, Washington 98104 Senior Title Officer, Bob Ludlow Unit No. 8 343-1328 Seattle Mortgage Commercial Loan Department STW Order No. : 64860 229 Queen Anne Avenue North Seattle, Washington Attention: Britt M. Nelson, A. L. T. A. COMMITMENT SCHEDULE A Effective Date: January 7, 1988, at 8:00 a.m. 1 . Policy or Policies to be issued: PREMIUM A. ,ALTA Owner' s Policy (6-1-87) Amount $25, 000.00 $225. 00 Standard (X) Extended ( ) Tax $ 18.23 Proposed Insured: -GOOD SHEPARD OF WASHINGTON, a non-profit corporation B. ALTA Loan Policy (6-1-87) Amount TO BE AGREED UPON Standard ( ) Extended (X) Proposed Insured: APPROPRIATE LENDER 2 .. The estate or interest in the land described herein and which is covered by this commitment is fee simple. 3 . The estate or interest referred to herein is at Date of Commitment vested in: HOWARD R. KIENLE and DORA J. KIENLE, husband and wife 4. The land referred to in this commitment is situated in the county of King, state of Washington, and described as follows: As on Schedule A, page 2, attached. crrY r'J', pi (c',1), \ 1' - ' , 1 id VE6 2 41988 BUILDING/ZONING DEPT. I ' Order No..''-64860 ' A.L.T.A COMMITMENT ' SCHEDULE A • Page 2 ' The land referred ,to in this commitment is situated in the county of King, state of Washington, and described. as 'follows: • . ' ,That portion of the southeast quarter of the northeast quarter of the southeast 'quarter _of Section 4, . Townshi.p 23 North, Range 5 East,, W.M. , in King County, Washington, described as follows: 'Commencing at the northeast corner of said subdivision; thence north 88°14' 32" west along the north line thereof 30.003 feet; thence south 0°58' 58" west parallel .with the -east line of said - .subdivision 30.003 feet; thence north 88°14' 32" west 125 feet to the true point of beginning; thence continuing north 88°14' 32" west 225 feet;. thence south 0°58' 58" west 170 feet; thence south 88°14' 32" east 20 feet; thence -north 0°58' 58" east '10 feet; thence south 88°14' 32" east 205 feet; thence north ,58°58' 160" to the- true point of begi•nning;- (ALSO KNOWN AS Lot 2 of city of Renton Lot Line Adjustment .Number 004-84, recorded. under Recording Number 8405179001) : END OF SCHEDULE P, • • • • • CITY or FindPC� M ff:', F-. " 1 [ FEB 2 41988 . • ' - '. BUILDING/ZONING DEPT. , • • V • STEWART TITLE GUARANTY COMPANY A.L.T.A. COMMITMENT . Schedule B . .. Order No. 64860 I. The following are the requirements to be complied with: A. Instruments necessary to create the estate or interest to be insured must be properly, executed, delivered and duly filed for record. B. Payment to or for the account of the grantors or mortgagors of the full consideration for the estate or interest to be insured. • II. Schedule B of the Policy or Policies to be issued (as set forth.in Schedule A) will contain exceptions to the following matters unless the same are disposed of to the satisfaction of-the Company: A. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters, if any created, first appearing in the public records or attaching subsequent to the effective date hereof but prior to the date the proposed Insured acquires for value of record the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment. B. GENERAL EXCEPTIONS: 1. Rights _or claims of parties in possession not shown by the public records. 2. Public or private easements, or claims of easements, not shown by the public record. 3. Encroachments, overlaps, boundary line disputes, or other matters which would be disclosed by an accurate survey or inspection of the premises. 4. Any lien, or right to a lien, for services, labor or material heretofore or hereafter furnished, imposed by •law and not shown by the public records,. or Liens under the Workmen's Compensation Act not: shown by the public records. 5.. Any title or rights asserted by anyone including but not limited to persons, corporations, governments or other entities, to tide lands, or lands comprising the shores or bottoms of navigable rivers,- lakes, bays, ocean or sound, or lands - beyond the line ,of the harbor lines as established or changed by the United States Government. . 6. (a) Unpatented mining claims; (b) reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; (c) water rights,- claims or title to water. 7. Any service, installation, connection;. maintenance or construction charges for sewer, water, electricity or garbage removal. 8. General taxes not now payable or matters relating to special assessments and special levies, if any, preceding the same becoming a lien. 2 4C. SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS: As on Schedule B, attached. P�'A ���� t. Order No. 64860 A.L.T.A. COMMITMENT SCHEDULE B Page 2 SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS: 1. RIGHT TO MAKE NECESSARY SLOPES FOR CUTS OR FILLS UPON PROPERTY HEREIN DESCRIBED AS GRANTED IN DEED: RECORDED: November 13, 1919 RECORDING NUMBER: 1363965 GRANTEE: King County 2 . City of Renton Ordinance Number 4025, establishing a proposed assessment district for sanitary sewer service by document recorded December 3, 1986 under Recording Number 8612031455. Please see the attached document for full particulars, including possible fees. 3 . DELINQUENT SECOND HALF TAXES: YEAR: 1987 AMOUNT BILLED: $430. 45 AMOUNT PAID: $ 54.28 AMOUNT DUE: $376. 17 PLUS INTEREST TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER: 042305-9259-03 LEVY CODE: 2105 4. GENERAL TAXES: PAYABLE ON FEBRUARY 15th: YEAR: 1988 AMOUNT: $423 .38 TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER: 042305-9259-03 LEVY CODE: 2105 CURRENT ASSESSED VALUE: Land: $33, 700..00. Improvements: None NOTE: Said amount has not yet been certified by the King County Assessor and is subject to possible change. 5 . It appears that improvements are located on the premises, but are not presently assessed. Supplemental taxes thereon may appear on future tax rolls. 6. Until the amount of the policy to be issued is provided to us, and entered on the commitment as the amount of the policy to be issued, it is agreed by every person relying on this commitment that we will not be required to approve any policy amount over $100, 000, and our total liability under this commitment shall not exceed that amount. (continued) Order No. 64860 A.L.T.A. COMMITMENT SCHEDULE B Page. 3 7. Payment of Real. Estate Excise Tax, if required. The property described herein is situated within the boundaries of local taxing authority of city of Renton. Present Rate of Real Estate Excise Tax as of the date herein is 1.59%. 8. An inspection of subject property is being made to determine potential lien rights and survey requirements, if any, and other extended coverage matters with a supplemental report to follow. NOTE: A survey of the herein described property was recorded under King County Recording Number 8405179001,.. a copy of which is . hereto attached. ' END OF SCHEDULE B RF/cc/0785i • • ,...`(c--;I. )'°; STEWART TITLE COMPANY • 1, ' `` ': of Washington, Inc. ORDER NO.- h4 81o0 IMPORTANT:This is not a Plat of Survey. It is furnished as a convenience to locate the land indicated hereon with reference to streets and other land. No liability is assumed by reason of reliance hereon. Pot i NCI E . 106TH• 6T.Aiss-/4 a2J16' 0-c..).7 004• p 4 ;- =s ;1: ,- 4 F. 0 3 ��i��� \ w i�•�+sTw— t. k Isr nl I. 1 •.is \ La ` ; to' _2 -°`?.e. .JaAde rp..._ rS$•14.32M �^ prl 444 1 ,,„\ .ti- : C.'! a Ai 6 • en 0020 r �' A' `s yy Jy 0 �� ek Q\ �a v�� �,� r �i1ro ,� NORTH rs rs ,v.ay. 4`.) a /7. r 3. so . ,, ,,, i.s.-„, . ai s..� ooso t�f1!A M • /� alai $e . Ar� . k. /0. « ...te.t-4 Ai Ictl clY It,' cs fI7Ii 2bsit ass r t :. s 0 ' i smg��� o SE. 107TH . 5T. $ f 1 7‘sTa , ' J /07 N.N•i�•JSN• a ilk.fsp so w0 L A f, :1 o `' •t'L�•t►r�AP o Ica ,�.4 y t t CO so J. -01 -aZAw- t• -7 7' N I I I I I • I I I • J • J i Sic -L I 'itt-f C —— —— — -1 :-- Msa',4,r w s2r o0• ._.,r I,L . II; •• 3 2R /OO.CIo i L25.LX7 ••..'_— "I I I 'ScA • I 1-OLO IOT C/NE I Tc.207 , c:.-WSW Lor Ion I ? I . 111111 ti I . Wo0 h Q L • o I - - — — — --I 1 o l�o � $ b 8 I I '.41 rc.se — J I. o :7:. .I. ,-•F 33 :{:,< Liari75G ` Eb i zs I N 1 I �I t 2 . I I 20500'I 4 I I O • • I . 1 ,vewivr-w/m07• 1 i� V I la II I I I ,:f.aa 23 asf•n•sf N T'• M I I (_r/: 7x+f ratn4v Or me Sit FFne•11.1 Yrni is;M Sams.I. Il b APPROVAL$ 1 1 TavuSn/P HNa7 RA/41 2EA7I MK Ee/4 Memmese/NOITK Disnrsf7 w T.y/S RECWPD dF SURYEy/{NS LeEEN PREHIREO 7z,DOCUMENT AS Fame OCGAV7.10.4 AT 7A!kOrMAST C06u1f of SAoo JuSb S/aN h./riff I. /r5 I .4 • LOT LINE REY/S/dV w/TNW TEE C/77 LNI/TS op RENTON. uRf�•n-w.vONi MSNatnruY WADY.fa Ool Flit prima 111131•N JwYc rf't .t MRA(LIL AA7TAf GJr twIOAJA/C SWON/S/L7N SO OOlri0T;77YSNCi 7' NN•u'!r•'W USO.00 AAr IC 7W 74/I reedrerAramoeNl,restEE(Reese.* ` I . EXAM/NE D AA'O APPROVED TAWS_LS-.LII FY* /YhY-A.A/994 MSSMIr W/0000Ap7,7MeM•J SOW OW I70oO r/il,•T7WKAJA7•N7TE Ir . mew/ti7,•ms.C,NO•5MY MIX TO fel nue"WIT OP 1.16wW i, I """"-'�- ter 2: 7NATPo[pe,"N 7W SAS 0/1Mul I OAIW.L.{O/JLCTiA.t, I I I . OCOECTgR-OER- -_PURL/C/WARMS 701WSGr 23 WOR7n,RA.Kf sear,/IA(K/Ns Caen";WASYA.eRW esirE 7O AT FOLLOWS:Of61NNo.G Ar 7M NOIt/l.r•COf WW O'Y.O JLlO 701-T,ddCf I .1 I . EXA.M:WED AND APPROVED THE/O_DIY OF,A•� .CO./98.E Ner'M: N ALLM.G me WWII Ni messe-•lOAJ IUJ mL•C5 JOJVL'W 1— _ �,,_. s7wu(LwmrOVI GIST LAI8'S9O.!LMON/SLwA'+au/1LT.TnNu „/eresso'W' cA rcoR lj _. 1 Na/AAar/IICOS rift IV 7W 7w4 Paul 8.Mi/u4M;7tau'CAWINt w w I CreM-'+J' js,QOa..,- NOrlelr'/.'frtooenr,•7MKJ SOH M-W/M 0,AA;•7NLNCs a ir'N:ee SE.G Ns�SE YA SEC.I-t 5 L9U'LOWG ANO ZAV/NG OFi/C/AL rem ear,71WNCt NO!!7f!AOOAio.7>.e�Cl Je7-/r1Ty LVLL70rf0,•AeNY 1 J/• _ I NO'KE!'E/idAO air>D AW TRW/10MI a'µ/Nu7Ay. . `. r EXAM/NED AND ARAROYED TE/Sf7.:YZIY arja II_.AD /984 . • RING COLWTY ASSESSOR DEPUTY .C I T Y OF RENTON L L A. -d¢ Cf_i_2).c10 - RECORD/NG_ CERT/F/CATE • SURPEYOR'S CERT/F/CATF • F/LEO FbR RECLWO TN/S 042 OF... A0/994 AT ,At.,/N 7W/S ALL.CLWROCTLY REPRESENTS A S/NYEy /1OOM OF SURVEYS all RIGS .AT TEE REQUEST AF M N ^ AOE Sy AL OR OTOER MY OECT.VN AN MENN,(7X J. OYLER, C.E. /G.S. ?i3-SOSO caNFORAIANa( I✓/r3 TAW'REQLNA VMENTS OF AWAOVETN ,/, OyLE.Q TEE SLLRYiy RECORDING ACT AT TEE _P.O.BOX 2258 REN7ON,AV,C seas& REQUEST AF DON VAN PA sTs AVA LK/94I. SIOYEY as AORTAIV OP TEE SEX/ LK .r.r A- THE NEA AF TEE SE Ye OT SEC new MANAGER SCf'T. OF RECORDS -777F M1 5524 , AXP,cL TE../7/-/i 4,7717?23 N.,RANGE 5EAST,/✓.M.,.W I . A'/NY cotwrr,H'ASN. .. oil.,•141. I( Ills e'.i•Tr S ..4I,W . 840/2 :. 1 • - OE1yE011US OtaY • RE g6'12i003 w 1 a55 g • RFCD F 10.00 517 01AENTON, WASHING1b1PHSL ++r 1 r).00 nfC '3 11 U L,,9RD211 RE NO. 4025 AN ORDINAN yaill :CM OF RENTON, AASHINGTON, ESTABLISHING AfP_.OPOSED ASSESSMENT DISTRICT FOR SANITARY SEWER SERVICE IN THE HONEYCREEK INTERCEPTOR SERVICE AREA AND ESTABLISHING THE AMOUNT OF THE CHARGE UPON CONNECTION TO THE FACILITIES. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I: There is hereby created a sanitary sewer Oservice special assessment district for the Honeycreek Interceptor 1-1area in the northeast quadrant of the City of Renton which area.is co CO more particularly described as follows: See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof as if fully set forth herein. A map of the project area is attached as Exhibit "B" and made a part hereof as if fully set forth.) SECTION II: Persons connecting to the sanitary sewer facilities in this Special Assessment District which properties have not been charged or assessed with the cost of the sanitary sewer main, shall pay in addition to the payment of the connection permit fe^ and in addition to the general facility and trunk , connection charge, the following additional fees: A. Area Charges (See Exhibit 'A' and 'D') • Residence dwelling units, apartments or equivalents: - $250.00 per dwelling unit C-mmercial Development: - 5C per square foot of gross site area B. Front Footage Charges: (See Exhibit 'C' and 'D') There is hereby created a subdistrict within the. Honeycreek Interceptor Special Assessment District consisting of properties fronting on Interceptor • Sewer: CERTIFICATE f.thsatd.tsfetsd, Maxine E. Motor Clots/Me City of Rant"Washing"t iQ tot Ns Is a true and Drat owof Ordinance No. 4025 Subscribed and Sailed this 2nd _day a#1SLShCA9 rS TOR RCM AT iifil� i city Clerk IN=tiME - . t[1�TDit 1)t!l1CVJL tJG. 33 x L HL . WOD,1A t 1 • ORDINANCE NO. 4025 The properties to be assessed for front footage are more particularly described. in Exhibit "C" attached hereto and made a part hereof as if fully set forth. The front footage charge shall be $37.19 per frontago foot, representing $74.30 per center line foot divided equally for property fronting on each site of the center line foot. lj SECTION III: This Ordinance is effective upon its passage, q 1-4 approval and thirty (30) days after publication. M PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this 17th day of November, 1986. GO gyp, Maxine E. Motor, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this. 17th day of November, 1986. awe Att. Barbara Y. S inpo h, Mayo- Approved as to form: 424/4*844.0a14/444hr,- Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Date of Publication: November 21, 1986 • • -2- E X H I B I T 'A' ORDINANCE NO. 4o2s AREA CHARGES . • ' - A parcel of land situated in Sections 2, 3. 4, 9, 10 and 11 of Township 23 North and Sections 33.and 34 of Township 24 North. all in-Range 5 East.. W.M., more , . - , particularly described as follows: , . , . . • . BEGINNING at a- point on.the-North of N.E. 27th St., also known as S.E., 97th St. in said Section 4, distant 386.4 feet east of the West line of said Section 4; thence North parallel to said west line and its extension into said . . ' Section 33 to the Thread of May Creek;.thence Easterly along the Thread of May Creek through said Sections 33, 34 and 3 to the West margin of 148th Ave. S.E.; • . -thence South along said'West margin to the North line of State Sign Route 900, - also known as S.E: Renton Issaquah Road; thence Easterly along said road to the intersection of the East line of the West quarter of said Section 2; thence , - South along said East line through Section 2 and said Section 11 to the South u, line of the North half of said Section 11; thence west along said South line ' - .1. through Section 11 to the center of said Section 10; thence continuing West *'� along said South line of the North half to the East margin of 138th Ave. S.E., also known as Duvall Ave. N.E.;' thence Northerly along said .East margin to the - - 04 North line of the South-quarter of'the North half of said Section 10; thence • • C., West along said North line to the East margin of 132nd Ave. S.E., also known.as , co Union Ave. N.E.; thence North along•said East-margin to the center line of S.E. . 116th St., also known as N.E. 10th St. and the Easterly extension of the South line 'of the Plat of Brentwood, Division 2. as recorded in Volume 72. page 46, records of King County. Wa.; thence West along said South line to the Southeast • corner of Lot 16, Block 6 of said plat; thence Northerly along the East lines of . - Lots 16 through 11 inclusive to the South margin of Y.E. llth St.; thence Northwesterly to the Southeast corner of Lot 10 in Block 3 of.said plat; thence • Northerly along the East lines of Lot 10-through 1 inclusive and its extension . , to' the North margin of N.E. 12th St:. thence West along said North margi.i 'to the ' • Southeast corner of the Plat of Bomarc as recorded in Volume 59. page 69, . records of said 'county; thence North along the East line thereof to the North- . east' corner of said plat; thence West,along the North line. thereof 157.71 feet • - to' the Southeast corner of.Queen Ave. right-of-way. as described in Volume 3738 of. Deeds on page 76. records'of'said county; thence continue West-along said - • ' North line of said plat 170.0-feet;'thence North parallel' with the centerline of ' - said Queen Ave. and its extension to the North margin of State Sign Route 900.. • . _ also known as N.E. Sunset Blvd.; thence Westerly along said North margin to the. . . West line of the East 484.62 feet of the Southwest 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 of . said settle, 4; thence North along said West line to the South line of the Plat • of Honey Creek Park as recorded in Volume 59 of Plats on page 57. records-of said county; thence-East along the South line thereof to the Southeast corner of _ Lot 9, in Block 2 of said plat; thence North and West along the East and North - lines of Lot 9 to the right-of-way line of N.E. 17th P1.; thence Northeast and Northwest along the Southeast and Northeast margin of said H.E. 17th-Pl. to the , - Southeasterly corner-of Lot.11. in Block- 1 of said plat; thence Northeasterly ' along the Southeasterly line-thereof to the Northeast corner of said Lot 11; - • thence Northwesterly 'along the Northeasterly 'lines of Lots 11 through 7, inclu- si've to the North line of said plat; thence West along the North line thereof to . • the Northwest corner-of said plat; thence South along the West line thereof to the Southeast corner of the Northeast 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of said Section 4;• thence West along'the South line of said Northeast•1/4 of the Southwest 1/4. - . a• distance of 320.12 feet; thence North 1307.0 feet.to.the North line of said ' S ' thwest 1/4 distant_322.20 feet West of the Northeast-corner thereof; thence •, ' West-along the South line of the Southeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 to the Southwest corner thereof; thence North along the West line of said subdivision to the Northeast corner of the Plat of Aloha Ranch No. 2 as recorded in Volume 82. page 3. records of said county; thence West along the North. line thereof to the Northeast corner of the Plat of Aloha Ranch as recorded in Volume 77., page • 7. records of said county; thence West along the North line thereof to the Southerly extension of the East line-of the Plat of Sandee Terrace as recorded in Volume 67. page 2, records of said-county; thence North along said Southerly extension tothe Southeast corner of said plat; thence continue North along the East line of said plat and the Northerly extension of said East line to the ' - South-margin of S.E. S7th St.. also known as N.E. 27th St.; thence Northeasterly to, a point on the.North margin of said street distant 386.4 feet East of the. •• . Wrq line of said, Section.4 and POINT OF BEGINNING of this description. L3-2850/X E X H I'd I T • i • fr, , . . , , , . ...- •s , . ••• . . . - ' • s, . . , • . . ,. • _ • . . . . • ' . . . .• - . ' . . ,. . . . . ' • . . . . . , • . . ' • . • , ., . . • . .. . . . . • . . • . ' . • • . . • . . . •. . . . . • •• . • • • • ORDINANCE NO., 4025 . E Xli•I I I T 'HI, • - • .• . . . AREA CHARGES' , • • . . . . . .. . . . . . . --. •..-,. .._-,- ....,-'•.. :"..• go. • - . im,.` 71-------Jr:.•-••-- . .• •t,.,..•:••' I, ill ' .rsta 4-: PC; L-tt. "411--014•4L.criiiii*.• 6 il• - ' . .1( ''• Sta.*Lt FM 11. •-- a */ ••••staiwiD , .e.•310•1•1. MASA - •••eill1 IN Fil• . •••••(11 7,•:,•ice :esL 1 1.•••..., ,;7•-••• ...;.. ILL -- Okt. S.--v. 30.1.0•11• ;•AI:: Ill•P•VIITMLA- :Li'5:". ' 6 .• 4. ; L. e Horezr--. . . , • fokki. i... _ . . . , • •II"'• •-•••.C•1-1 . ; :c1-4::' • -•:;.,--.. ...,.• 0 ••1 II,,i • . , • ‘17.r• 1 1• .i• 71 i .4.....?.-7'is r7 - v - r .' .1. -•- ti• _NOVO . • .•IF ' t 4 . .- . ,......... . 9 ,...4.11. • •,ri• e _. ?P, •.1..•:r1 Meal. •Plaint', . r- :Lsrs.-2.7ip444... _. .0._ .4,1,--la.:--,• 4? ••1•'•. .9....X/4.... ....-•••• ..-.- - - ,k ... • r-ttlil r•4•••'-7 -1......"-1 ti7i •t•..t id ' • a • 4 L 44! . . •..: 5r; ile40 17 crr ---r-1 '.-1/' ts • • g s'..,47 . ...,..(1. . , .4. . :. •• gat i...5. is, ;.--4-5.51 -:;-.1-i;-.1÷t - '•-. Mil •,,,,`,,, • - cc . fur •-f. .-. •11111111 -:_;Eja=1 • • -. r vink..m .' '-'W;G1 ' ' i N. V**•"1.":- ...., ar '' ''',11 •• 'sr -i '-.". e,„,,,-f. 7seL.H., . ''''••AT. 11r.;:reL;s-..;.' . • . %,......y" " ... ll 1 y • I „,..'• " ••••-,, "'if,. '''' . ' S. 1. • A a,d„.., ', 'au LT: 1 OM 1.004 .\_...._ : 13 - . f•t•••' •••15"..... • ....Ail, - i • A,,x • t 1 p` - • I 4, &•c•o• .„:-, di . I ' 3 .. t .- • ...- .1- WM • ;4 : •'6••• 4)1--• lei .n:Pr"P.1: 1 . ' r---••• . a.;, • .2 a te..._ _sd : i - f.15 . o in l'___ . ..0• ,...• ; ! - ss.......... f 1 u... - tf „... . ..f.'sf .• , '''''G3Q M il 4 ?iii• i L.::....:::i• •-,4 ._ 1 .., ........r. .. •' 03 . !"6 IVASob 0 0 ' , •oo, ii, t•s .•+. 's s;.,,, stc4444,4y„. 14c1•0441 g is-us r 1- gt ••••-.7 , . .4. .6 ,3 1 ill'Iretitj--, .' 'T'sr " " 1=2001fir0 .. • • LPIEL04J-.. 4 listsi ,I4Itinpitoizi - .... ..: /... ',. I§F. i'''''•."•'' , 03 lrek ' IP -r2:44. • r 1 '''''.1.'''.1'...i.i '' ..I 4 ••1 lAii 3 3-il/IAA I, . ' •at°.afilitt.t.:. i• i • •40 l''Iiiffik ',11 R = ..1 v 1015 • LIE; ,, ,, • ,. 2 S 3••bit/it 5.1!! i ilif4 ' • ,M' ••• • _'J 11.•-i-3-) ;• 1 ... ... . -.. .,/ i 50400‘ 'turf 4,12,- ....u.si L.2 ,7,...r"2, mao.••1 . 4i1Vol. mi a •,moot to -ram If_ ''....--c° •••i°4 _--y.--)t " - '• Pt. .... i 0 3 *la "i r 114-1111.11.......r"."..:1112& till 31: 4 ---77?.. .°L. J-÷V.- - ...an. - -• 'I's. -. 7121=Z" ICD • 41. •,••• 444 .. . ••-• '1119:9,IL.31-"alf6Wrigi 1 i C•10996 111 : ;4 ty.,93j,A SI In 1$ ..411•Gall •t.7•-•'. s •I i ••••• \1,1 •• 7.1_ • ..-s. ELF . „4„, " i•I 3 -11; ..-lcoti0:. i Ir . -mull a ,, •• •-....„_ **. ,,, r 4.. •,00o, 1 - t. c° Au • • ASA II 1•: 1 •• ...z..2.0. taacuToca, i LI 1.' •,;.,` !••Tts •• -. a.- • „, ,. = i I --.1k • "V Alr;i!: is "'"'•,;Vti. At. -a yilitiiimildfi'4n-4 Eill 2- ..tE-74 t'"arnerL'r'''''-'74-;, --;-;."-•• \ . • • s-- - --1 11W - -. ! 1411,BES- - 41-;.":-. -.r_. , :t i t - - fcr.---tts,5.e . ct., *,•-i, se‘c. I.• __A.,.....E. ., „-„, 6 , ..,•••; -Pare I ' r tc:5, - ,-s--:: '..• . "Al ?'-=.---. • • . - .- .--"' . ;7•37,e. i"• IIVAili • Viwl.••••ff5 •12.11 , AUC!.../ [.-...c.......51-:•• •••••: (ICI, ...„ .\P•e' ii:g-•rz,d'.:0... "i .. - ,,,•11- 1 -""3-.."4 .1 3 1:" „7. ...lo .. .m”r.:-='•''''...,..•i 4:P6• -.1. -,," ' l': --01 - -.A to ; AIN • ,. ... • •,. /4,.I, 1-i 1 '7' ... • ' • :a.Mili"Pi . ...:. 11. • . 6 4it r...0, - • r i•••• - •, ;k7:Inaj .0 ... 1 . CI 1 , ro" j‘i'N ' I g - er r- - ••• le.,,i.h 4, Itri.. '.... .. „. , . ••••,, t eisv oil • ;v., .in : IDE!. ALMill J 11007.00. r• "P'-_,,,•• • L..... I ro 4-5--.17•!•7r • "' -'73..... 1 it... .14,4N;N.E. • • • 02-• n1'6 . . IF ..... (11... imiomes; °r_ a• ' . t .s, - . • 4 ."AV i•-•1!• t.•"'I',..:..• I.-- I.....:2 8' a . •-' ita•-`144%. of 421-4 VI-1 10 .... r.."1417,34. .• W .ist„.._' '...-=;..e-.11.4.-a«r•; ' . ‘,4•t !'" "" --49.-'---- ••••ri • •• .4-te , 1 - n ,ii. : L• '.1.''•':. s,. i' , * 'n - c wn • , %.,... „2„...., -J1--.1 4C.14.: ,,.. _....m.,.. = . :2, ... 2.-.--44 •" 7 - - -.1 - • r.; ‘ - • - -4,4' .f-t• IC'• "L--..L."7i:I " :• •' ' to-1 )'-1. .Pt'1 12'. - ; . .1 i • --rt - 1. 0 Awl* • ; ze-.*:N re r•I. ok. 4/!. •Oli ..h.. - • •. lip.-0.."- .q1 waL•til w --.- -. .-71- . .- `h,..7t$ b.... • j:.:1;:.51 Ani cio !.•• • a....._-- . • ' rty,:. q)... la, .11,./,. . 5/• • -1n7,..zit!, moo. •. . r s.t. t• :t ft. ! • . - ' s '- • / r"k -- •1 1 :!'. .. ' ; . .36 •••• W .T.' • ., art--.. ;.- 1'... J 4.--f ' ....--',... tl.:.'Keno -1La. 1 3•-• .74.74f7Er. ' . 7:,....„„,,, (4.,.. .:4,,_ .....„.,„.......;„,„," - „... , 3.1,...s .,.., trn,• -:-- .. • . ,. . ' .;:><1.:.,...4.•,,314.:'.1--:11 : :--1-.4. -4.••'t I I.1" 1 : X a x..-_, ...-- ,...., 1- ,. - -xi-p- AREA CHARem "‘"'" . - . •-,-.. AL. ''''' . ' • •••••••-r4.„,,,....7 rn. ..„, :71-7,...-,orz' ,_ „AI ,....... ,km 11... :- 7,37-,..--:. 43 "L.,. -': atouNDARY .-,,,g!;*.n , 03teli. LJI•i, i„e_r_ -Tr-- •;cr-- .,,.-••-1 •••••• 1,.", 1" Li.,"- -3 SUITIO •d..04.9.2.,•131.,"elZonizz.5.1.. mItvaLrj,. ••••3•.•21 . ''•Y , \S'. .Lk. 8 ' !..: g • A...t".23,..ssi ii yz,i., 4...F;4 .;• 5 re 1-.=12 Ict rlif--.1:F• it.=7••-•'.'•7i, a -ir s.•_13*2 • •• •1-. if ArE.: x 47)1 '''1. 5 ST .1 a to 'Mj:. • 1.1•,' 421: It•'7.1 ''' SE. 4' •••••• . Iveg • . f ••• 2••••••. • • • '-' - •I , . . •• • • •.:,04 ,• . •• . • 1 • . , • • • • • • • t‘.4'.;iii ; • • , - . . [•.1 . •.t.i•!. . . .:),C13 EXHIBIT • "..”.;•..;I: A'.• . . . 0 " • . 1.ff'!.' •.•Z'i • ',••••. . , . 11 .....:; . . . .r. "••• VI .... ...... .1 .-.. •••••••••••• ' . . • . EXHIBIT• 'C' ORDINANCE NO. 4025 . FRONT FOOTAGE CiARGES A parcel of land situated in Section 4, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M.. '! more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at a point on the East margin of 120th P1. S.E. a` the intersection of the Westerly extension of the South line of the Plat of Paradise Estates as recorded in Volume 95 of Plats on Page 93. records of King County, Washington; thence East along said Westerly extension and the South line thereof to a point 555.64 feet West of the East line of the Northwest quarter of said Section 4; thence South parallel to said East line 392.7 feet; thence East parallel to the South line of the Plat of Paradise Estates No. 2 as recorded in Volume 102 of Plats on Page 31. records of said County to the East line of said Northwest • quarter; thence South along said East line to the center of said section; thence L7 East along the North line of the Northwest quarter of the Northwest quarter of ar the Southeast quarter of said section to the Northeast corner of said sub- division; thence South along the East line of said subdivision to the Southeast ri ,l corner thereof; thence East along the North line of the Southeast quarter of the 02 Northwest quarter of the Southeast quarter of said section to the Northeast TI ri a0 to the corner of said subdivision; thence South along the East line of said subdivision • Southeast corner thereof; thence East along the North line of the South- east quarter of the Southeast quarter of said section to the East line of the _ West 310.57 feet of said subdivision; thence South along said East line to the North margin of State Sign Route 900. also known as N.E. Sunset Blvd.; thence Westerly along said North margin to the West line of said subdivision; thence ' continuing Westerly along said North margin to the West line of the East 484.62 feet of the Southwest 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 of said section 4; thence North along said West line to the South line of the Plat of Honey Creek Park as recorded in Volume 59 of Plats on Page 57. records of said co.nty; thence East along the South line thereof to the Southeast corner of Lot 9. in Block 2 of said plat; thence North and West along the East and North lines of Lot 9 to the right-of-way line of N.E. 17th P1.; thence Northeast and Northwest along the ,. Southeast and Northeast margin of said N.E. 17th P1. to the Southeasterly corner of Lot 11, in Block 1 of said plat; thence Northeasterly along the Southeasterly line thereof to the Northeast corner of said Lot 11; thence Northwesterly along %, • the Northeasterly lines of Lots 11 through 7 inclusive to the North line of said p'.at; thence West along the North line thereof to the Northwest-corner of said plat; thence South along the West line thereof to the Southeast corner of the 1 ';;: Northeast 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of said Section 4; thence West along the v. South line of said Northeast 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4, a distance of 320.12 ?' feet; thence North 1307.0 feet to the North line of said Southwest 1/4 distance 322.20 feet West of the Northeast corner thereof; thence West along the South line of the East half of the Northwest quarter of said section to the Southwest 1 , corner thereof; thence North along the West line of said East half to the South margin of S.E. 97th St.. also known as N.E. 27th St.; thence Southeasterly along said margin to the intersection of the thread of Honey Creek, said intersection also being a point on the Southeasterly margin of 120th P1. S.E.; thence con- tinuing Easterly and Northerly along the Easterly margin of said 120th P1. S.E. i",:: to the intersection of the Westerly extension of the South line of said Plat of Paradise Estates and POINT OF BEGINNING of this description. . A L.: l'''' '' r. L4-86510 1.::; EXHIBIT z'r - W. ,,,:::.r,:t .4,-4,„ NL' ORDINANCE N0. 4025 • EXHIBIT 'D+ FRONT FOOTAGE CHARGES Ul SEC.-4 )TWP. 2.3 N.., RG ` 5 E.,W.M. . a c., o CD t .« I r /75 i r ' i II z l g� .t CO 2,TH S A_ PAR;••ts6 ^ x ,11 a ,1A5 . ALT -4 Es T'NgEs 4:1:4 '1 f V4NDERMAY� ./e ' I hie ',c+ .el �•. it E E . [•}cam s► ?��+ � 1. .ffi SCHO°L '1-ii•' • FRONT FOOITA6C yr •• �+r►3T';.ti : se_ • •.. s1' J _. . N''rot"' .1 ' METCALF �e: CNARGt BOUNDARY J z1Ro si .\., • 0 - tl•L i. 1-t1I a 4. '. a*. \CO •.• / ' , ,‘" 41314_ •i .— •' 'vg llt a Up 4Wk *O. 0 t �!•;ice' � �' Wri II;. • .� c L .� . 1 (31, al q,. r• lii, Allr' . C Ent . ,,,, �� 1 y 0 'k I :%1 .-41 .-ti-t--. Q r r I � ear. 2 • Q' N[ .�.r.jlN �i I• 0, '-'s z _ 21•fik 4 s? ‘)•\•-• Al g t i' 1. 1 6,j 101 •li .i 1 '—61 , B� *i C Q t ... i Ld.l K G. w r, , or, L J'.os.ytii _ 2Tf lei i.. �t $T. ,..... .,, �� � �.`i � � ,'w.t ..1w• I . J1 . EXHIBIT g 1 13 • EXH T 9 ( 11 Pages ) . P \OL ICA NA LYSIS SE IESi's:. 1E S • ISSUES RELATED TO WELSCH v. NOOT /NO.. 11 • An Analysis of Minnesota Propert Values of Communit Intermediate Care Facilities for Mentally Retarded ICF-MRs) Since the 1960s, the ideology underlying provision of services to developmen- tally disabled people, and the methods of treatment deemed appropriate have undergone a dramatic shift. The term "normalization" most frequently used to name this shift, encompasses several interrelated movements. Deinstitutionalization, the most important of these, aims to return developmentally disabled people to community settings and to enhance the system of care provided to those who remain in institutions. Successful deinstitutionalization requires an adequate supply of appropriate community placements and implies integration of developmentally disabled people into the community. While the first requirement can be met with sufficient funds and other government action, integration into the community is a more 0 subtle obstacle--a collection of factors which hamper community acceptance of developmentally disabled people. Zoning legislation and court action can force neighborhood compliance, but neither is equipped to deal with the emotional concerns that underlie a neighborhood's attempts to exclude a group home. Wherever group homes are proposed, neighborhood opponents present a familiar litany of resistance. Though their concerns run the gamut from fear of increased criminal activity to concern for the safety-of group home residents, these diverse complaints often mask a larger concern: decline in property val- ues of their own homes. This paper deals with the reality of property values in neighborhoods which contain a group home for retarded people. Using assessed valuel as a measure, property values of group home neighborhoods were analyzed for the year preced- ing and the year following the establishment of the home. Changes in these property values were compared to changes in similar neighborhoods without group homes to determine if the establishment of a home caused a decline in the assessed value.of surrounding property. CITY OF Fi7NTO:1 D P I rl TII E I t)A ION IN MINNESOTA 11 . MinnesQ ,k was an early leader in developing community alternatives to insti- FEB 2 4 AiPion care. The number of mentally retarded individuals in group homes BUILDING/ZCltvi1vci DD-1_ Assessed value: the value of a home as determined by the tax assessor in cal- culating property tax. Because many states limit the annual increase in asses- sed value, the market value of a home often exceeds its assessed value. DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES PLANNING • DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY, PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT 201 CAPITOL SQUARE BLDG. • 550 CEDAR STREET • ST. PAUL, MN 55101 • 612/296-4018 • • Policy Analysis Paper iii July 1 , 1982 . Page 2 Al has increased dramatically from the 100 residents who lived in five facili- ties in 1962. -_In..July=1982, Minnesota had 298 group homes with a total licensed capacity of 4,781. At the same time, the number of state hospital residents diagnosed as mentally retarded declined from, 5,542 in 1962 to 2,395 in March, 1982. The latest: declines can be attributed to a recent court consent decree (Welsch v. Noot, 1980) which mandated an 850-person reduction in state hospital MR population by 1987 and sharply curtailed future admissions to state hospitals. The Welsch v. Noot decree, combined. with general growth in the system, will generate demand for hundreds of new community spaces by 1987.. Minnesota has not been immune to .protracted opposition to group homes. Local ordinances, restrictive covenants, and narrow definition of "family" prevented the establishment of many group homes until a 1975 state law undercut local opposition (M.S. 462.357) . The new legislation required that local governments treat. group homes of six gr less as single family residences. The lengthy process of public hearings and zoning approval was thus eliminated. The same law established group homes of -7-16 residents as multi-family dwellings for the purposes of residential .zoning. Though a decade of court challenges ensued2 the law has been upheld by the Minne- sota Supreme Court. - II. LITERATURE REVIEW The extensive literature which examines the impact of group homes on pro- perty values is unanimous in its conclusion: group homes do not reduce sur- rounding property values. Studies conclude this regardless of the method used to measure property values. • Measuring impact of group homes is a complicated process, and researchers have employed several methods. Generally, studies choose a sample of city blocks or census tracts which contain a group home. These group home blocks are each compared with a similar "control"3 block. One of several measures of neighborhood impact might be used. Some studies look for increases in the number of sales in group home blocks as an indication that neighbors are trying to escape a nearby group home. Others try to determine if it . takes longer to sell houses in group home blocks than in control blocks. . But the central focus of most studies-i s -change i ri *property-values: - --_ Several measures of change in property values have been used. . Generally, researchers compare: (a) changes in assessed property value in group home neighborhoods to changes in control (non-group home) neighborhoods; (b) sale price -as a percentage of list price in both group home and control neighbor- hoods; or (c) sale price of homes sold before the group home was. established. 2P1ost recently, Costly v. Caromin House, Inc. (313 N.W. 2d. 21 Minn. Supreme Court 1981) . 3The control block is a residential block without a group home, but which is similar in all other respects to the group home block. By comparing group home blocks and control blocks, the effects of a group home on property values can be distinguished from changes in, housing values generally. • Policy Analysis Paper • • July 1 ; 1982, ' . ' Page 3 • . to prices these same homes commanded .when sold again after the group home opened. Group home impact on surrounding property values has been examined in sev- eral parts .of the United States and in a cross-section of neighborhoods. A Laming, Michigan, study (Lansing q Planning Dept. , 1976) found that the average sale price of homes in a group home neighborhood_was_ equal to"jor higher than the sale price of homes in control neighborhoods. A Philadel- phia study (Dear, 1977) examined impact on a number of property transactions. Of 3 5 transactions tracked in,:a six block radius of the sample of group homes., 59% occurred before 'the faci i i ty_onened, and 41% after. There were li c-alines in• property_va_Le_s i ndeed_t homes adjacent to group homes exper- ienced the largest increase in value. • An Ohio study of group home neighborhoods (Montgomery Count Board of Men- . tal .Re.tardation, 1981) concluded that property values in these neighbor- • hoods experienced the same increase or decrease in market price as homes ' i n s ar neighbnrJ th&tsIQse_. oxim ty toagroup home did not alter the market yalue. and that group horlr.es_AidJIat.._.generate more property_ turnover. Likewise, in White Plains, New York, a 1976 study (Breslow, 1976 tracked property values for six months before and three years after Atilk . the opening Of a facility. The general, trend in property values was compar- able to the control areas. • In the Philadelphia study, twelve neighborhoods which contained mental health group homes were examined. The investigators found that the' number of sales was higher in group home neighborhoods. But the authors concluded • that. the mental health facilities were not the cause since the number of sales was not related to distance from the facility. Moreover, no decline in property values was found.. In the most extensive study• of property values to date (Wolpert, 19781.pro- ;perty value changes of 42 neighborhoods in New York State were analyzed. • . _ by focusing on homes which were sold before- the grow home opened, and. • again, after the establishment of the home. Once again, no relation was found between group home placement and decline in property values or number of transactions,_.EYepLadiacent homes experienced the same changes in pro- perty values as homes in control neighborhoods When a 1980 Columbus, Ohio, study (Mitchell' .and Wagner, 19801_used_sale price As a percentage of asking price as__the measure_ of""property-value_, the . authors concluded that the__rat_i o__di d,_not decline, i n_._a"neighborhood.,after a ;q`roup home was established.. Furthermore, homes in experimental neighbor- hoods sold just as quickly as homes in control neighborhoods. III. METHOD A complete list of group homes for the mentally retarded was compiled from Minnesota Department of Public Welfare licensing records. A random sample of 34 homes with• six or fewer residents was drawn, though only homes for Policy Analysis Paper #11 July 1 , 1982 Page 4 which a comparable control neighborhood could be located were included in this analysis. The final sample size of 14 group homes was evenly divided between homes located in the Twin Cities and homes located in the remainder of the state. For each group home in the sample, the investigator marked out a one-block area and noted the exterior condition of each house. A control block -of housing similar in age, maintenance, and assessed value was then selected. Assessed value was used to measure property values, and was obtained from the local tax assessor's office. For each parcel in the group home and control blocks, the assessed value was obtained for the year preceding and the year following the establishment of the group home. Any property trans- actions during this two-year period and their sale prices were also recorded. The percent increase in value during the two years was calculated for each house and an average increase in assessed value was derived for each block. The results were then subjected to statistical testing to determine if dif- ferences occurred by chance or were statistically significant. f Policy Analysis Paper #11 July 1 , 1982 Page 5 Table 1 Mean Percent Increase in Assessed Value for Group Home Blocks and Control Blocks (Minnesota ICF-MRs: 14 Paired Blocks, 1981) Paireda Mean Increase ..ofb Standard N Mean. Increase 'of Standard N Block. Group Home Blocks Deviationc ' Control Blocks Deviation o q, A 28.22 8.58 8 29. 13 8.0 9 B 9.04 10.7 14 13.82 7.1 13 C 33. 10 6.8 10 . 36. 14 _ 17.4 .11 D 22.70 16.0 13 22.20 7.5 13 E 8.83 1.7. 29 9.72 3.4 27 F 16.08 4.8 11 14.29 .6 10 G 37.92 3.8 14 39.30 7.7 24 H 35.86 11.9 30 ' 30.77 12.3 29 I 17.59 4.8 13 17.91 4.8 23 J 31 .07 8.6 9 31.09 6.7 13 K 50.34 21.9 33 48.80 15.2 38 L 15.48. 5.1 ' 24 14.08 5.9 26 M 12.71 11.0 12 19.44 12.0 11 TOTAL 25.96% 220 26.7% 247 a) Each block with a group home was paired with a similar. block without a group home, the "control" block. There were 14 pairs in the study. (A-M) b) The mean is a measure of central tendency, often called the "average." The mean percentage increase for each block was calculated by totalling the per- cent increase in assessed value for each house in the block and dividing. by the number of houses. c) Standard deviation measures whether individual percentages "cluster" around the mean percentage increase for the block. The standard deviation will be small in blocks where the percent increase in value was similar for each home. Policy Analysis Paper: #11 July 1 , 1982 Page 6 • Table 2 - Difference in Mean Percent Increase in. Assessed Value for Group Home Blocks and Control Blocks.. • - (Minnesota I-CF-MRs: 1.4 Paired: Blocks,. 1981) Paired Difference in Meana t-valueb df pc Blocks Percent Increase . • A .91 -.226 , ' 15 .83 B 4.78 =1 .377 22 . 18 C 3.04 -.538 13 .60 D -.50 -. 103 17 .92 E .89 ', 1 .222 37 .23 F -1. 79 1 .232 10 .25 G .38 -.206 ' 35 .84 H -5.09 . . . .1.619 56 .11 I -.33 -. 197 34 .85 • J .02 -.004 14 .99 K -1 .54 335 ' -- 55 .74 L -1 .41 .897 48 .37 M 6.73 -1 .403 21 .18 TOTAL .74 ' a) The mean percentage increase for control blocks was subtracted from the mean percentage for the corresponding group home block. b) The t-test helps determine if the difference between means is significantly different. The higher the t- value, the more likely that the difference in means is real and not the result of chance fluctuation. None of the t- values here are statistically significant (for p < .05). c) The p value refers to statistical probability value. The p value of .05 indicates the probability of the event's occurrence (by chance) is less than 1 in 20. Policy Analysis Paper #11 July 1 , 1982 Page 7 IV. RESULTS Assessed value increase Tables 1 and 2 list the average increase in assessed value for each control block and each group home block. Although differences were found when the assessed value increase for group home blocks was compared with the increase for control blocks, none of the differences was statistically different (p < .05) . Mean percent increase in assessed value ranged from 9% - 50% for group home blocks and from 9. 7% - 49% for control blocks. However, as Table 2 details, the differences are not all in .the same direction. In five instances, the mean percent increase in assessed value was higher in the group home neigh- borhood. Also note that the standard deviations vary substantially which may indicate that a few extreme cases are artificially affecting the mean value for a specific block. However, an inspection of the median percent increase demonstrated that median increases in assessed value for group home blocks did not vary substantially from the corresponding control block 1 medians.4 Overall , the mean percent increase for houses in group home blocks was 25.9% while all houses in control blocks experienced an average 26.7% increase in assessed value. Number of transactions ✓ Although the sample included 220 houses in group home blocks and 247 houses in control blocks , only 75 property transactions were recorded during the year preceding and following establishment of a group home. These 75 trans- actions were almost evenly divided between group home blocks (48%) and con- trol blocks (52%) , which seems to indicate that group homes do not cause excessive numbers of transactions. /The analysis of these transactions found that for group home blocks , 49% occurred in the year before the group home was established and 51% occurred after the home was established. In control blocks, the figures were 36% and 64% respectively. Again, the timing of transactions seems unrelated to the establishment of a group home. ✓ V. DISCUSSION This study confirms the results of earlier research on group home impact on the surrounding neighborhood. Changes in property values are not rela- ted to the presence of a group home in the block. Similarly, neither the number nor the timing of property transactions in a neighborhood has any- thing to do with the establishment of a group home. While the results of this analysis unequivocally support this conclusion, there are limitations to this data. First, assessed value may be an 4The median is the value above which and below which half the values fall. The median is not distorted by extremely large or small values. Policy Analysis Pap1 nll • July 1 , 1982 Page 8 imperfect measure of market value. Because annual assessed value increases are limited by law, assessed value is rarely as high as market value. Second, because many of the group homes in the sample were established after 1979, the small number of property transactions may reflect a general ° downturn in the housing market rather than satisfaction of property owners with their new group home neighbors. i Policy, Analysis Paper #11 July 1 , 1982 Page 9 o REFERENCES Banda, J. & Lippert, T. Developmental Disabilities Trends and Services in the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area. St. Paul : Metropolitan Health Board, 1980.' Bates, M. State Zoning Legislation: A Purview. Madison: Wisconsin Council of Developmental Disabilities, 1981. Breslow, S. The Effect of Siting Group Homes on the Surrounding Environs. Unpublished manuscript, 1976. Carroll., A. & Chronin, M. Group-Based Residential Facilities in Minneapolis. Minneapolis: City Planning Commission, 1980. City of Lansing Planning Department. The Influence of Halfway Houses and Fos- ter Care Facilities Upon Property Values. Lansing, Michigan: Author, 1976. Dear, M. "Impact of Mental Health Facilities on Property Values ," Community Mental Health Journal , 1977. Department of Public Welfare. Residential Care Study. St. Paul : Author, 1979. Mambort, T. , Thomas, E. &. Few, R. Community Acceptance: A Realistic Approach. Dayton: Montgomery County Board of Mental Retardation and Developmental. Disabilities, 1981. Mitchell , D. , & Wagner, C. Group Homes and Property Values: A Second Look. Columbus: Metropolitan Human Services Commission, 1980. Wolpert, J.' Group Homes for the Mentally Retarded: An Investigation of Neighborhood Property Impacts. New York: State Office of Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 1978. The Policy Analysis Series is published by the Minnesota Governor's Planning Council on Developmental Disabilities and the Developmental Disabilities Program, Department of Energy, Planning and Development. Richard Nelson, M.D., Council Chair - Colleen Wieck, Ph.D. , Director The purpose of this series is to enhance communication among state and local agencies, service providers, advocates, and consumers on timely issues; We encourage reader participation by giving us feedback on your ideas and perceptions of this problem. This paper may be cited: Developmental Disabilities Program. Policy Analysis Series #11: An Analysis of Minnesota Property Values of Community Intermediate Care Facilities for Mentally Retarded (ICF-MRs) . St. Paul, MN: Develop- mental Disabilities Program, Department of Energy, Planning and Dev- elopment, July 1, 1982. r • A • E) 3IT 10 ( 4 8 Pages ) • • Woodrow Wilson School ' ` .' of PublicAffairs and International Affairs f---. . LONG TERM NEIGHBORHOOD PROPERTY fl ACTS OF GROUP, HODS FOR TALLY RETARDED PEOPLE Lawrence W. Dolan and Julian Wolpert Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs Princeton University • • Princeton, New Jersey 08544 November 30, 1982 • Princeton University . • _ . _< �': 1-,,•Rf,.'r: .''lT'; 'rF-':)i j,Y ' `I-.`,?'.•:,,: •;1",- V._`,. .yam-.'.-w.°`` zF41.„*, 1•eY1.4.xV `, •111 I 'i: t•,..Y T.'1-f--•'• .-- . ZiYrv. -•: �:- :f" •.i;,, .. V fl,; %;%.:: ;'_w�,...:-.:xt;.,, ......,. : -,i ; "R 4 4..1,...t i. ,. ? ' '::"'tom\^r.t.`U.� f_•Ef : ') 1 • • 9 :" .sx.:i. • l • y�t:•�y . es?i • 8 f=i �v .pis, ,►:s 1:' ` b i# .a .: 7- T a�tiy; .yi Ya. y� N ^"F:Sa .k 'i�T Y J..TR •_ BUILDING/ZONING DEPT, • ~ • • EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This updated and revised study ,of a 1978 .analysis of group home impacts.'has generally confirmed the earlier findings. The principal U finding of the 1978 study was that the siting New York State group • • homes for mentally retarded people' had no appreciable immediate impact . on neighboring properties. • The updated study analyzed market prices and turnover rates for properties neighboring thirty-two` (of the original forty-two) group homes in- the 1978 sample in eight <.of the original ten) New 'York State communities.. Data were collected and -analyzed for neighborhood property ' transactions before and after establishment of' the group homes and a set of matched control sites. The data were analyzed to test the effect of proximity to the group home on property value changes and proper.ty. turn over-rates. The updated' study made " it possible to examine property sales in the five year period subsequent to the siting of the sampled group homes. A "windshield" survey of the group homes and other properties on the same block. provided an. assessment of the condition of the homes 'relative to their. neighbors. Findings of the current study are summarized below and' explained in greater detail within the body of .the report. The updated impact. analysis has indicated: ' 1. proximity of neighboring properties to' a - group home does not " significantly affect their market- values in the short or long term; • • • • 4. 2.. establishment of the group hones was not associated with a higher degree of neighboring property turnover in the short or long term; 3. the group hones are not very conspicuous neighbors; those with fewer residents (eight or fewer) are generally less conspicuous than larger hones, although some of the largest blend very well into their surroundings; (conspicuousness is measured by the condition and design of the structure, design accommodations, condition of the yard, visibility of staff and residents and parking arrangements) ; 4. the group hares are generally well maintained and on a par consistent with other homes on the same block; and 5. neighborhoods with established group hones have not been targeted 4 'for additional hones for retarded people = a "fair share" 'system has been maintained. • j • INTRODUCTION This report addresses the issue of the long-term impacts of group homes on the surrounding community. The impacts examined in this report are those associated with changes in property values and residential turnover. The group homes included in this study are residences for mentally retarded adults in eight New York State communities, selected to represent a range of upstate and downstate, low and moderate income, and urban and suburban neighborhoods. The impacts are based on long tern observations; almost all of the group homes included in this study were established five or more years ago. The attitude of a community toward the placement of a group home for mentally retarded people in its midst is a. highly complex matter to unravel. A detailed and comprehensive study involving a sample survey of households,• community groups and leaders, and public officials would normally be needed to acquire a sufficient amount of information. Instead, the precedent has developed in impact studies.- to focus upon property values and property turnover rates as key indicators of the strength of community attitudes toward the establishment of group homes. If, for example, the group home siting is perceived as a "normal" event, then the occupants in the residences • are accepted neutrally, or as assets to the community, in the same manner as a traditional family. The group home's entry into the neighborhood would not trigger off unanticipated relocation decisions by neighbors, and purchase prices of - iv - % ti new homes would not be affected significantly by the addition of the group home. Property values and turnover rates would be affected solely by general real estate trends. If, on the other hand, neighborhood reactions are severely negative, then announcement of the group home siting could possibly be accompanied by precipitous decisions by neighbors to sell their residential properties, even at a reduced price. The neighborhood spillover effect could be measured by the decline in sale prices below anticipated values, i.e. at a relative loss in comparison to comparable neighborhoods not experiencing such sitings. The use of these indicators is assumed, therefore, to be a catchall of the behavioral response of neighbors and, therefore, a reasonably sensible barometer of impacts. These measures have limitations associated with their use as indicators but a•careful and rigorous analysis of property value effects • over a cross-section of different kinds of communities can provide a valuable information stream which is useful to guide officials who site facilities as well as resident groups in the relevant communities. It is difficult analytically to isolate the pure effect of group homes on the market price of neighboring properties separate from all of the other factors which can influence market values. Therefore, the study employs a system of paired comparisons of property value and turn- over rate changes in the vicinity of the group homes and control homes in matched neighborhoods. Group home impacts are assessed, therefore, in terms of significant differences between property changes around group homes as opposed to control homes. - v - !. This study updates an earlier (1978) analysis of property effects which demonstrated no significant group home impact in the period immediately following establishment of the homes. Observations for the updated analysis are the same asthose included in the earlier baseline study both with respect to group and control homes (except for those in Buffalo and Syracuse which are omitted and two other group homes, one in Brooklyn and one in. Yonkers, that have closed since the time of the last i study.) Before examining the findings of the current study, the 1978 study will be discussed. Because the analytical methods used in both studies are similar, the earlier study will be reviewed in some detail. 1 , • • vi . THE 1978 BASELINE STUDY • The Sample The sample communities selected for the 1978 study were representative of neighborhoods in which group homes had been sited across the state. These areas tended to be communities with a large • proportion of single family dwellings, were predominantly moderate income and located downstate, i.e. Long Island and the more suburban zones of New York City. In selecting study sites preference was given to communities in which there were at least two to three group homes to avoid the bias of unique incidents. The list of communities (and group home sample) includes the following: Syracuse (3) Buffalo (6) Kingston (3) Hempstead (2) Valley Stream (2) Bronx (9) Brooklyn ( 17) Yonkers (3) Albany (2) Tray (5) The original sample included ten communities which had a total of 32 homes as of March 19, 1978. Ten group homes were not included in the final analysis. Such homes were omitted because they were located within apartment complexes or other high rise dwellings, making it impossible to accurately gauge the effect of the facility on property transactions, 'prices, and turnover races within the impact area. Two larger community residences (Castle Hill in the Bronx, capacity 32, and The Adult Retardates Home in Brooklyn, capacity 26) were included in the sample because of their. location in predominantly residential areas. ' ! 2 • Procedures The first stage of data collection involved field work in each of the j neighborhoods where a group home was located. The facility and all buildings within a one block radius (two-block area) were identified and , plotted on a map. The type of housing unit in which the facility was located, the type of neighboring land use (single-family, apartment, commercial, etc.), and the physical condition of the properties in the impact area were noted in the mapping. Any unique features of the group , I I 1 home were noted, and its relative conspicuousness was evaluated on a ! scale from one to five. The facility's physical condition relative to the surrounding structures was evaluated on a similar scale. Photographs were taken of the facility and the surrounding area. Demographic and socio-economic information on the impact areas and the sample communities was gathered by using census tract data in the 1970 Census of Population and Housing. The second stage of the research involved the identification of control areas. Controls were chosen using census data, which closely mirrored the socioeconomic, geographic and physical characteristics of 1 the neighborhoods containing the group residence. In addition, land use patterns were examined and only those areas with similar patterns were selected. Finally, all controls were chosen to avoid clusterings of community residences or other social service facilities. (Once a control area had been identified, one house was designated as a "psuedo- facility" to measure distance effects for control sites.) As community residence and control neighborhoods were identified, mapped and evaluated, data were collected concerning property 1 3 assessments and transactions. Records of real property transactions were located for each of the original ten study cities. In some instances the records were found in city or county offices, while in others privately published Real. Estate Directories were utilized. Sales for each property within a one block radius of the facility or control were traced to find all sales in the area from January of the year preceding the facility's opening (i.e. if a facility opened on 3/75, data would be collected from 1/74). For properties sold during this time period, sales before the opening were traced back to 1967 for comparability. Nominal sales or sales within a family were discounted. Finally, information was gathered, where available, about opposition and controversy surrounding the opening of facilities from newspaper accounts and from discussions with those responsible for the siting of group homes. Property Value Study The study attempted to gauge the magnitude of neighborhood reaction to the siting of a group home, assuming that such reaction would evidence itself in the real property market. Property value impacts were examined through a regression model. A regression equation was estimated for the impacts on neighboring properties surrounding the group homes; a separate equation was estimated for the control areas. The dependent variable in the first regression model was the change in market price of properties in the vicinity of the group .home (or control site) divided by the number of months between successive transactions, i.e. the increase (or decrease) 1 4 in purchase price of the property per month. Transactions were included only if sales of property occurred both after. and before establishment ' of the group home. For the control area, a. comparable date was 'used to preserve the match of transactions.. The independent variable in this first model was distance, as measured by the number of houses away from the group home or its control (measured from 1 to 30). The equation thus estimated the "effect of proximity to the group home on the change of value of neighboring properties," as measured by sales price. The 1 regression equations were then compared: group home impact versus control area impact. The coefficient for the distance variable fi indicated the additional increase (or decrease) per month in property price for each unit of distance away from the group home or control site. The hypothesis of no impact would be confirmed in this model if the distance coefficient for both group home and control were not. significantly different from one another; or if the distance coefficient. for the group-home did not depart significantly from zero. Property. Turnover Rates A second type of analysis was carried out for examining property ' turnover rates in the area neighboring the group home AA compared to the control area. For this analysis, a tally was made of the proportion of residences in the relevant areas which had been sold during the period covering twelve months after the establishment of the group- home. This was compared to the same twelve month period in the control area for' each of four distance zones around the site. This analysis was designed to measure the impetus toward :a relocation decision sparked by ' I \O t 5 establishment of a nearby group home. The hypothesis tested was that property turnover rates were the same near the group home as in the control. area. • Findings The correlation and regression analyses for the baseline study did • not support the assertion of group home impact on neighborhood property values. Degree of proximity to either group homes or control homes had no significant effect on property value changes. Properties next door, across the street, or a few doors away from a group home had basically the same increase (or decrease) per month in value (as measured by sales prices)as properties farther away. The same was true, of course, for properties close to, or far away from, the control sites. The simple correlations (r'.09 and r'.08) , indicated non—significant relationships positive in value, but at low enough levels as to not differ significantly from zero. The regression coefficients yielded the same findings--the slopes were slightly positive, but not significantly different from one another or from zero. The analyses were carried out with the subgroups of properties experiencing before and" after transactions (with respect to establishment of the group home) ; with: the expectation that this sample is unbiased with respect to proximity effects. Property turnover rates revealed a similar pattern with respect to the distance factor. For the twelve month period following establishment of a group home, no greater proportion of adjoining properties were sold than those farther away. Transaction rates around 6 • f group homes were equivalent to those around the "dummy" control •� . property. The more detailed analysis revealed that even in those cases of high turnover of nearby properties, sales prices were consistent with the prevailing neighborhood trend of market values. In all, data on 754 property transactions were analyzed in the vicinity of group homes and. 826 in the control areas. Of these totals, 92 neighbors of group homes and 89 neighbors of control sites experienced before and after sales relative to the establishment of the homes so that property value trends could be analyzed. Similarly, 153 neighboring properties of group homes and 178 neighboring properties of control sites were sold in the 12 month period following the establishment of the homes, so that property turnover rates could be analyzed. • Findings of the analyses are summarized below and explained• in greater detail within the body of the 1978 report: • 1. No evidence of neighborhood "saturation." i.e. , over— representation of the group homes within any given type of community or city; 2. Generally, the group homes are consistent with, and compatible _ with, neighboring properties in type and size of structure; 3. Generally, group home function was not conspicuous; 4. Group home maintenance was generally better than surrounding properties (e.g.., outward appearance, landscaping, etc.) ; and 5. Group home residents generally were not visible or noticeable from the street. With respect to the impact of group homes on surrounding properties: 1 . 7 1. Property values in communities with group homes had the same increase (or .decrease) in market prices as in matched control areas; - 2. Proximity of neighboring properties to a group home did not significantly- affect their market values; 3. The immediately adjacent properties did not experience property value declines; and 4. Establishment of the group homes did not generate a higher degree of neighboring property turnover than in the matched control. THE UPDATED STUDY Four years have elapsed since the original study was conducted. During this intervening period, community opposition to group homes for the mentally retarded has abated somewhat.. Yet, concern is still being expressed 'about possible community impacts. No doubt, some of this concern reflects continued homeowner anxiety about the effect of group homes on nearby property values. _ Others have expressed reservations about the limited time period of observed impacts after establishment of the sampled group homes. The early stage "neutral" effects reported in the baseline report are not necessarily predictive of longer run neighborhood effects. In addition, the news media has raised the issue of whether group homes operated by non-profit. organizations are better maintained and. thus less likely to • • have. a negative. impact than those operated directly by the state agency. These understandable concerns have motivated the reassessment contained in this report. The re-examination of neighborhood property (3 . _ 8 • transactions, prices and exterior maintenance of the group homes addresses these important concerns.... The 1982 Sample, The updated study provides continuity with the earlier investigation. The research has been- carried, out within the same communities (except for Buffalo and Syracuse) with data collected for the same group home . and control neighborhoods as in the previous study (See Table A). With respect to each group home and control site, property • transactions and selling prices were recorded as in the earlier study (updated to June 1982). The statistical analysis focuses on the two . major property indicators: changes in property value (all paired transactions) and property turnover rates (a 20Z random sample of transactions). As in the previous analysis, both of these indicators • are analyzed for sites with respect to known distances from the group home and control. sites. The outcome of this analysis is a determination of whether or not property transactions and turnover rates near the group homes, as compared to the control sites, have changed in the interim since the earlier study. The maintenance, conspicuousness and related' issues have been examined through analysis of "windshield" observations of group home and control area sites. Field observations were collected for each of the 32 blocks on which the group homes - were located and the blocks containing control homes. Notation was made of block characteristics such as: predominant lot width and setback, location of parked cars, . I presence of street litter, type of street, condition of front and side 8-A H TABLE A: SUMMARY OF. GROUP HOME STUDY AREAS. Group Home Areas Median Study • l/ of ' Sales # of G.H. City Area ID Sales Price Residents Valley Stream 10001 25 68,500 9 10002 30 50,500 12 • Hempstead 10102 55 41,000 7 Brooklyn . 10201 35 33,500 26 10202 155 90,000 10 10203 • 25 44,150 11 10204 60 55,100 13 10205 110 33,700 15 - 10206 60 47,500 8 10207 25 29,000 10 10208 30 72,500 • 12 • 10209 25 114,500 • 3 10211 70 41,500 15 • 10212 65 42,000 . 8 Yonkers 10303 25 74,800 8 10306 55 43,550 8 Bronx 10402 35 11,000 - 8 10404 20 -- 8 10405 25 34,000 8 . 10406 110 39,700 • 7 10407 • 130 43,000 52 Albany 10501 . 15 82,500 16 10502. 10 52,000 16 10505 50 34,250 9 Troy 10601 45 28,500 6 10602 80 20,300 8 • 10603 35 23,900 8 10604 35 22,400 12 10605 10' 50,500 15 Kingston 10701 30 32,000 9 10702 40 22,000 9 10703 25 43,000 10 9( 9 yards and overall condition of neighboring homes. Selected characteristics regarding the condition of the group homes were also noted. Finally, the field observation provided an assessment of the conspicuousness of the use of the residence as a group. home. Data Analysis : Impacts on-?roperty Values 1 Extension of the earlier analysis of property impacts involved examination of neighboring property transactions surrounding group and control homes over two separate time periods: 1. "before and after" transactions (a property sale preceeding establishment of a neighboring -group home and a subsequent sale); S 2. "after" transactions (first and second sales of the neighboring property after establishment of the group home. The "before and after" transactions (measured in terms of increase, or decrease in value per month of the neighboring property) assess the immediate effects of siting the group home. The "after" transactions (measured similarly) assess the longer term property impacts subsequent to establishment of the homes. The same two types of transactions were analyzed for the control homes. Following the format of the earlier study, regression analysis was used to assess property impacts. The regression equations estimate the increase or decrease in sale prices per month between transactions of neighboring homes which can be attributed to their distance from the 1 10 group or control home, respectively. A positive value for the distance • coefficient would indicate an increase in sales price ($100) per month. for each distance unit from the group or control home (i.e. , a negative impact of the home). A negative value would reflect a distance decline in sale prices (i.e. , a positive impact of the home on its nearest neighbors) . The residuals from regression measure how much more or less the distance impact was observed to be, rather than predicted, on the basis of the regression relationship. Findings : Impacts on Property Values The analyses demonstrate that the group homes do not have a significant property impact on their nearest neighbors (Table 1). The "before and after" coefficient for the group home set is slightly positive•(.11 - i.e. , an $11 per month increase in sales price for each distance unit away) but the relationship is not significant (the coefficient is not significantly different from zero) . The "after" coefficient is quite consistent ( .08 - slightly positive but not significantly different from zero). Coefficients for control home impacts were slightly negative for the "before and after" period and more negative for the "after" period for reasons relating primarily to the method in selecting the controls. Analysis of the extreme residuals for the group home neighborhoods (i.e. , significantly higher observed than predicted values for distance impacts) revealed highly idiosyncratic neighborhood factors as primarily_ responsible for these. differences. In one Brooklyn neighborhood, for example, rehabilitation of dwellings several blocks from the group home • !7 • . 1 10 - A • • • TABLE 1: Regression and Correlation Analysis of Distance Effects on Property Values -- Group Homes and Control. Homes • • Group Homes Control Homes • ! Before and After - Coefficient .11. N.S.. . -.06 N.S. Cr = .13) (r = .08) n = 173 na231 After - Coefficient .08 N.S. -.54** Cr a .03) (r = .30) n . 113 • n = 135 ** significant at 95% level JT.S. -- not significant • • I . • 11 site led to their considerable price appreciation rather than any impact from the group home siting. The role of these erratic factors may be seen from the plotted distribution of the residuals from each of the regression equations (Figures 1-4) . The findings indicate that factors other than the establishment of • the 32 group homes in this study are responsible for the property value changes that have been observed. Neighboring properties to the group homes generally appreciated in value in parallel with the control home areas and the inflation rate. Extremely high changes in sale prices of properties were spread evenly throughout the areas. The findings indicated that changes in property values thus cannot be attributed to the group homes. Property Turnover Rates Data were collected for all property sales in the vicinity of group homes and control sites to assess the annual turnover of properties. The parallel analysis carried out in the earlier study indicated the same turnover rates in both group home and control site areas. The earlier findings indicated no short run increase in property turnover following establishment of the group homes in comparison to control areas. The focus of the updated study was to examine the long term trends. Findings from the updated study indicate that slightly more than 5% of the ten nearest neighbors of the 32 group homes were sold during the first year following establishment of the group home (virtually the same as in the control areas) (Table 2) . The same turnover rates applied �9 • I . • ISIU 1S1(I . O'Sf o•ez 0•aa o•la oo•t o•5f o•oa 0•la o•1(l oar 5•af 5•ha 5•LI cot o5•f 5•If 5•IIa 5'41 5'01 (IS•f . .+. . . .+. . . •+. . . .t... .+. ...+. . . .+... .+. . . .+. . ..+.. . .. . .+. . ..+. . . .+. . • .+. . ..+. .. .+. . . .+.. ..+. . . .+. . . .+. . . . . 1 • 0 • 1 t 0 * 4 d- t + ta- o 1 0 1 • •• • 0 . • • I • t O 0 t 0l- + 1 1 + el- U • . . 0 c), 1 • 1 0 A - • I I I ' • o • al • I t 00 + '6- .1 t 1 . + '6- • 0 S 11 1 • 00 0 11 • 1 a I l • • 0 00 00 00 ' 0 • 1 l a aa.. 1 a V • 0 0 0 0 •0 O 0 0 d' • • al a e it ae • I 1 I a a 1 • 11 t 0 0 0 00 00 0 00 JJ MMM ma mil um* AIM MY t •() o . + I I fa 1 ea l l 21a 94 al laf 2a a * '0 U ' OJ Md J *Jo MM JM MM *di 00 000 00 00 da 0 0 0 0• 1 1 ad & I f GI. 2I.• 2 21 l El 1 1 1 • I • J 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 00 O 0 0' • l 11 I l ' I 1 1 1 SI 1 II l • S ' 0 0 0 0 0 0 l I a 3 • 0 0 0 '(I 1 I 1 1 U + 0 0 0 0 0 0 •+ '6 7 + l I 1 a t - •6 0 0 0 0 1 1 I 1 1 0 0 3 1 0 0 I • I 1 0 • a • t + Ill I + + Ul II • d • + * fa + + la ' I - - -- _ = . - - - - - • t- . I- • �� :ot:a_(V awoH dnoa;) ails aOj uol3enba IIaalJV pun aaoJaalll :T a_tn2lA 1 Ii'Ignre 2: "Ile fore and After" Equal:Ion for the Control Areas rq 1 • v v • - • • F• ... .+. . . .+. . . .+. . . .+. . . .+. . . .+. . . .+• .. :+. . . .+. . . . . . •+. . . .+. . . •+. . . .+. . . •1. . . •1. . . . �. . • • 1 . . . .1• • • •4• • . 7h - + . I . 0 . le •+ 1 ; 1' In + . 0 + • It 2 U 12 ; 3 + I. 0 ' C 12 + I . 1 u 0 0 + 1 II 1 I I. . 00 0 0 0 R 3 1 I) 0 0 E 6. 4 II S I 2 3 2 A 6. + 0 0 0 0 0 + I 1. 2 • N :0 0 O u 0 - 0 •. 0 . 1 2 1 2 2 I 1 1 2 I • Il 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U 2 6 3 1 1 II •N p p N p N N p N N N N N N N N O U 0 . A 0. +3 1 1 "1 3 5 1 4 12 5 3 7 11 5 II 3 3+ 0 0 0 0 0- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N N p N p p p " L • 3 2 5 5 6 2 6 2 6 1 2 2 7 1 II n. +0O 00 000 00 0.0 0 + .2 3 1 1 II II -1 2 1 1 3 S . 0 0. 0 0 0 0 0 3 2 • I. I I I 3 It . 0 0. 0 0 0 -6. + 1 II 1+ V O 0. 1 1. -6. + '0 0 + II 1 u . • 0 2 1 . .0 . -12 + + -12 + + ' 0 _ 1 O ' -18 + 2 - 2+50. .+.: 7 50..+.. 12.5..+. . 17.5. +, . .22.5. :+. . . • . + .+. . + •+.. +• •+• . +• +. . 1 .+. . • •2.50• •7.50• �12.5 • 17.5• 27.5. 5.011 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0 5.00 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0 u1S1 • u1St • • • • 1 Figure 3: "After" Equation for the (;roach Ilome Areas 1 P • 0 I ICill + 160 + + I' • ' • I( 1 1l0 + 120 + + I 0 + 1 1 0 R 80. + + 80. + a E S I A 0 I N . 0 I) 1 I) 0 • 1 110. + • 0 0 + A 110. . 1 } A 1 1 . 0 . 0 0 0 . 1• 1 1 1 II 0 0 0 0 0 t 1 1 1 S . 0 0 0 0 00 0 00 0 0 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1: PP "" PPP "I' *" P"P rK PP I'"P NN *e rrr NN x PP 0.0 + 11 1 13 I 1 2 2 11 1 + R 0.0 + ' 0 00 00(1 00 0 0 0 00 00 00 00 0 0 0 0 + 3 111 232 32 31 212 31 12 211 34 22 I 11 1 V o 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 1 11 I 1 1 1 1 r o o 1 1 1 • I) o O I 1 • -110. + -1,0. + + - - -80• + . + 80. + O + 1 •3.50 • 10.5• � •17.5• • •24.5• • •31.5• • • •3.50• • • 10.5• 17.5 •211.5• •31.5 1.0() 111.0 21.0 28.0 35.0 7.00 14.0 21.0 28.0 35.0 GIST 0151 • w • • 1510 • !S10 • 0'SZ 0.O2 0'51 0111 00•5 0'SZ 0'OZ O'51 0'01 00'S 5'ea 5't1 . 5'el OS'L • OS'Z S'ZZ 5•LI 5'al OS'L o5'a .+ .+ . . .+. . .+ . . .+ .+ .. .+. . ..t... .t. . . .+. . .. . ..t. . . .t... .t. . ..t.. . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . 't' '+' t' 't' t' 't' + 0 -I- U•Sl- • O l • 0 • +* I 4 • + 0'6I- ' 0 0 I Z 1 * O t 115't- O 1 II ' . . a 1 I e f 0 0 O 0 + f 1 l Z * 05'L- 0 0 7 1 f 4 twit + J 0 0 o O t 0l1'0 A . l Z 5 f 1 1 a d r 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • II Z 1 Z Z f f l l J J J 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 o ' :1 f 1 1 1 1 O r r 0 0 0 S + . 1 1 f f * 00.0 0 0 4 r d 0 0 O 0 I 1 + 0 J J r 0 0 * 115't '0 l V • 0 J J J o f A ' ' 0 d d 0 11 a 1 5 U J d d • N I f + OS'L I • 0 .I ' V I f S * 0 + ll'S1 3 0 0 (I U -1 + • 5 t 0'S1 1 I ., 1 t o + 5'LZ 1 a 0 0 0 f • I 0 II + t 5'2Z 0 d • ll t + o'llf . I 0 O $ .t ll•llf . i . . .t . . .+ . . .+ . . .+ . . .t . . .+ . . .t. . . .t. . . .t. . . . . t.+ . . .t . . .+. . . .+ . . .t. . . .t . . .+ . . .t . . .t. . . .t. . . .t 5'JL' H H eaaV joaluo3 air' ao3 uoFdl:nUa HaaJiV„ :q aanyla 0 • 11 - E • • TABLE 2: Annual Turnover Rates of Neighboring Properties 11 (percentage of properties i.n the ring which were sold) • Nearest Neighbors • 1 - 10 11 - 20 21 - 35 '1 • I " First Year Group Home Areas 5.91% 6.31% 10.44%. -• 'I Control Areas 5.33% 4.83% 3.78% First Three Years • i . Group Home Areas 5.43% 4.77% 6.46% Control Areas 5.91% 4.82% 3.56% • First Five Years 1 Group Home Areas 5.30%. 4.05% 6.86% Control Areas 4.91% - 4.69% 6.43% 1 it 1i l 1 12 annually during the first three years and the first five years after the group homes .were established. Turn-over rates were not significantly different for the closest ten properties than for those in the second and third rings for any of the time periods. The five year period should have provided ample time for close neighbors to move away if they found proximity to the group home to be objectionable. The fact that turn-over rates are the same would appear to indicate that neighbors stayed or moved for reasons unrelated to the group hares' presence. Condition and Conspicuousness of the Group Homes and their Neighboring Properties The study of group home impacts included a "windshield" survey of the home and its neighbors on the same block (see survey instrument in Appendix). A significant portion of the survey examined the conspicuousness of each of the group homes. Before discussing these findings it should be pointed out that some of the group homes clearly identified themselves by using prominent signs. The survey indicates that very few of the 32 homes were conspicuous as group facilities even among those serving ten or more residents (Table 3) . Conspicuousness was measured by characteristics of the building structure or its modifications, the condition of the house and yard, the visibility of residents and/or staff and the number of parked cars. Additional findings from the windshield are listed below: 1. five of the larger group homes were ranked in the least conspicuous category. 2. no relationship was discovered between conspicuousness of the • group homes and property impacts or turn-over rates.. . 12-A 11,1 TAME 3: CONSPICUOUSNESS OF GROUP HOME AND NUMBER OF RESIDENTS CONSPIC SIZE FREQUENCY I PERCENT ROW PCT I COL PCT I 1 TO 1010VER 10 1 TOTAL + + + INCONSPICUOUS 1 12 1 5 1 17 1 37.50 1 15. 63 1 53 . 13 • 1 70.59 1 29.41 1 • I 60.00 1 41. 67 I + + + SOMEWHAT CONSPIC 1 8 I 7 I 15 1.1 1 25 .00 1 21.88 1 46.88 1 53 .33 1 46. 67 I I' I 40.00 1 58. 33_ I + + + TOTAL 20 12 32 62.50 37.50 100.00 STATISTICS FOR 2-WAY TABLES CHI-SQUARE 1. 012 DF= 1 PRCB=0. 3144 PHI 0. 178 CONTINGENCY COEFFICIENT 0. 175 CRAMER' S V 0. 178 LIKELIHOOD RATIO CHISOUARE 1. 015 DE= 1 PROB=0 . 3137 ' CONTINUITY ADJ. C:?I-SQUARE 0. 410. DF= 1 PROB=0 . 5220 FISHER' S EXACT TEST (2-TAIL) PROB=0 . 1696 II ( 1-TAIL) PROB=O . 9152 - 4 i • 12-B TABLE 4: CONDITION OF. THE GROUP HOME IN ,RELAT'ICN TO NEIGECRING PROPERTIES CONDITION OF THE GROUP HOME FREOUENCYI PERCENT I A. AVG. AVG. M. DEF. ROW PCT I COL PCT 11 12 1 3 I TOTAL + + + + 1 1 1 I 1 I 0 1 2 ABOVE I 3 . 13 I 3 . 13 I 0. 00 I 6 . 25 AVERAGE I 50 . 00 I 50 . 00I 0 . 00 I 33 .33 I 3 . 70 I 0.00 + + + + 2 1 2 I '21 1 1 1 24 I 6 .25 I 65 . 63 I 3 . 13 1 75 . 00 CONDITION OF AVERAGE I 8.33 I 87.50 ( 4. 17 I' DWELLINGS I 66. 67 I 77. 78 f 50.00 I ADJACENT + + + + TO THE 3 1 0 I 4 1 1 1• 5 GROUP HOMES. MINOR I 0.00. I 12 . 50 I 3 . 13 I 15 . 63 DEFECTS I 0. 00 I 80 . 00 I 20 . 00 I I 0 . 00 I 14. 81 I 50. 00 I + + + 4 1 0 1 . 1 1 0 1 1 MAJOR I 0 . 00 I 3 . 13 I 0 . 00 I 3 . 13 DEFECTS I 0. 00 1100 .00 I 0 . 00 . 0 .00 I. 3 . 70 I 0 . 00 I TOTAL. 3 ' 27 2 . ' 32' 9.38 84.38 6 .25 100 . 00 STATISTICS FOR 2-WAY TABLE, CHI-SQUARE . 6. 325 DE= 6 PROS=C . 3277 5tI O. 44S CONTINGENCY COEFFICIENT 0 . 406 C3AMER' S V 0 .314 r - -=CCD RATIO CHISQUARE 4. 787 OF- 5 Po R 57 , • Gt7 13 3. the group homes are generally well maintained — only two appear to have minor defects (Table 4) . 4. the- condition. of the group hares is quite consistent with the condition of adjacent dwellings. Although same are conspicuously larger or have been noticeably adapted for handicapped residents. I 'I CCNMESICN 1 • The updated group have impact study has revealed no long term effects on neighboring properties or on turn-over rates. The findings indicate that if objections once existed to the siting of the group hares, neighbors' fears about panic selling or reduced prices were never realized. Over the five year period following establishment of the • hares, no disruption occurred in real estate trends. The group hares 1 . I have, for the most part, maintained low visibility, maintained the buildings and landscaping adequately and have no property value impacts on neighbors. 1 1 I • I 1 nOt APPENDIX PH. OTOGRAPHS . - • APPENDIX II STUDY DATA • • TRANSACTION DATA MASTER FILE el r i • • • • • • Key ID — Site identification numbers - • • • DIST — Distance of property from group home (Measured in number of building lots away from 'the group of control home) • DTOT — Number of properties within same distance ring T$1 — Sale price before opening of .group home (measured in hundreds of dollars) Ti — Number of months before opening of group home in which sale occurred TGH — Number of months group home has been open (as of 6/82) T$2 -- Sale price of first transaction after opening • • of group home 1 T2 — Number of months after opening of group home in - which. sale occurred T$3 -- Sale price of second transaction after opening of group home _ T3 -- Number of months after opening of group home until second transaction • • PTOT — Total number of properties in neighborhood • . NID -- The study area with which the transaction corresponds (used to link control and study areas) FT — File type (identifies transaction as part of the property value subfile, the turnover subfile or . both) 1A copy of the survey instrument will. be found in Appendix III 1'I 2See Appendix IV for a list of study neighborhoods • • • M� • 11L.E: NYMAS1EII PRINCETON UNIVERSITY TIME-SNARING SYSTEM PAGE 001 . LONG ISLAND ID pIST 0107. 71$ T1 TGN 12$ T2 73$ 73 -P707 . NID FT ' 10001 7 70 304 42 52 500 '8 95 000 . - 2 - - - 10001 10 70 - 52- 700 28 • • 95 - 000 1 - • 10001 5 70 52 500 26 95 000 1 - 10001. ' 2 70 455 7 52 95 _ 000 1 10001 " 8' 70 52 740 16 . 95 000 1 • 10001 9 70 '280 92' 52 510 21 95 000. 2 . 10001 15 25 52 610 '5. • • 95 000 1 . - 10002 16 40, 97 430 41. 500 64 65 000 2 , 10002 17 , 40, V 97 635 119 . 65 000 . 1 . 10002 12 110 91 370 44 640 97 65 000 2 , • 10002 7 25 •- 97 600 68. 65. 000 1 • • 10002 12 40 . 97, 480 56 -65 000 1 • - • 10002 19 4097 1130. •85 . 65 000 1 . 10002 . 16 ' 40 97 530 32 65 000, 1 . 10002 12 . 40 ., 97 470 . 32• . .• , - '65' . 000 1 . V • 10002 ,7 25 400 42' 97 , 700 44' . 65 000.;. . 2 , 20003 1 GO 97 111111 79, . . 80 002 1 . , - 21)003 1 60 52 4114 33 . . 80. 001' 1 - - . . .20003 17 60 97 . 184 5 728 98 80 002 2 ,20003 7 60 184. 41 52 728 52. 80 001 2 . 20003 9 6052 410 -5 80 001 1 . • 20003 9 60 97 410 50- 80 . 002 1 : 20(103 8 .60 91 3711 23 80 002, 1 20003 9' 60 184 7 97 565 68 80 002, •2 V 21)1)03 9 60 184 .53 52 565 22 80 001 . 2 . - 20003 7 . 60 354 12 97 670 86 80 002 . 2 . 20003 7 60 3511 .57 - 52 670 41 80 001 2 V 20003 3 60 410 3 52 . 80 001 1 20003 3 60' 97 410 113 80 002 1 • 20003 8 60 97 590 29 . 80 002 1 1 20003 9 60 274 40 .97 391 68 , 80 002 2 V V. 20003 12 20 97 500 67 ' 80 002 ' 1 20003 13 20 97 384 42 80 002 1 20003 12 20 52 500 21 • 80 001 • 1 • 20003 . 13 20 384 4 52 80 001 1 • 20003 9 60 274 85 52 391 23 80 001 2 . 20101 11 30 145 '320 30 465 128 80 102 3 '20101 1 50 145 3811 114 80- 102 . 1 _ • 20101 3 50 145 234 32 400 38 80 102 2 , 21)101 6 50 1115 210 11 434 101 80 102 3 . 20101 6 50 145 290 33 424 91 80 102 3 20101 9 50 264 2 145 350 32 • 80 ' 102 3 V ' 20101 3 50 1115 490 102 80 102 1 20101 •11 30 145 444 103 80 102 1 ' • 20101 9 50 145 360 70 80 102 1 V . 20101 9 . 50 1115 350 24 417 50 80 102 2 20101 12 30 145 111111 129 80 102 1 - - - ; - -- - --- __ = __-. - -- _ _--___ _. FIFE. N-YMAS1Eli- - PRINCETON-UNIVERSMr-fIME=SHARING=SYSTEl1--==-- -_"-=-=-=-PAGE-`003--' ----`-----` - _=-- -_ ----- -- -- -- 10202 311 160 314 27 15 1771 93 260 000 3 10202 31 160 350 32 15 820 23 260 000 2 10202 32 160 450 22 15 1010 79 260 000. 2 10202 30 160 15 1345 '93 260 000 1 . 10202 25 160 15 1001 91 2202 105 260 000 2 10202 26 160 320 ,23 15 811 30 1101 85 260 000 2 . 10202 22 160 15 650 1 260 000 1 . 10202 9 40 15 530 57 260 000 1 10202 - 9 40 15 550 6. 214 92 260 000 2 10202 6 40 15 423 57. 260 000 1 102(12 . 5 40 15 920 9 1173 66 260 000 2 10202 1 40 - . 15 2192 100. 260 000 1 " 10202 4 40 15 1051 32 1465 69 260 000 2 10202. 6 40 - 15 2284 57 260 000 1 10202 4 40 15 1331 44 2042 69 260 000 2 10202 8 40 15 840 55 260 000 • 1 . 10202 23 160 15 615 31 716 62 260 000 2 10202 32 160 15 800 20 980 46 260 000 2 102(12 31 160 530 31 15 1001 43 990 - 79 260 000 3 10202 21 160 15 850 30 2032 • 87 260 000 3 • 102112 21 160 15 2220. 109 260 000 1 .10202 22 160 15 900 57 260 000 1 • 10202 26 160 15 869 '8 2302 86 260 000 2 10202. 27 160 15 900 1 260 000 1 10202 28 160 15 334 26 810 30 260 -000 2 10202 .29 160 15 1071 40 1051 114 260 000 2 , 10202 .30 160 . 15 870 •',7• .1.165 • 58 260 000 2 • 10202 ' 33 160 714 5 15 530 2 260 • 000 2 . • 10202 34 160 15 900 -56 210 98 260 000 3 10202 12 60 750 9 15 1501 .82 260 000 2 - . 10202 13 60 15 620. 33 260 , 000 1. 10202 14 60 850 2 15 1003 71 260 000 2 102(13 7 6(1 170 38 57 190 . 6 170 000 2 . ' 1(1203 36 40 57 453 22 170 000 1 10203 22 40 57 468 44 ' 170 000 1 . 10203 11' 70 310 7 57 170 000 1 10203 ' 1 60 . 51 200 19 170 000 . 1 . • - 10203 10 60 57 430 51 170 000 1. 10204 -26 60 144 600 .41 ' 140 000 1 10204 29 60 . 144 - 300 101 244 109 .140 000 2 10204 22 .. 60 144 450 92 140 000 1 •� . 102011 24 60 . 144 200_ 45 520 138 140 000 2 102011 23 60 144 43011 124 140 000 1 102(111 20 55 144 .3(10 88 130 119 1110 000 2 102(111 19 .55 1114 150 211 590 139 1110 000 2 10204 14 55 - 144 480 139 140 000 1 10204 11 55 • 144 270 59 500 100 140 000 2 10204 it 55 144 551 60 830 131 140 000 3 10204 19 55 1411 11110 125 670 130 140 000 2 10204 211 60 144 500 54 910 140 140 000 2 10204 27 60 1114 602 103 1110 000 1 102(14 11 55 11111 324 70 140 000 1 • 10204 30. 60- 290 3 11111 1110 000 1 102011 25 60 1114 560 59 620 115 140 000 '2 ==,10204-,24 - - 60,__-_---_ 144 590 49 _ 654 110 _440__ 000 -=2= __ _:-- _-__ _---__----_---- _-- -- ----- - ------. • FILE: NYMASTLR PRINCETON UNIVERSITY TIME-SHARING SYSTEM PAGE 002 201(11 14 30 145 300 17 461 121 80 102 2 201(11 16 30 1115 400 124 80 102 1 20101 15 30 145 354 30 1105 98 80 102 3 20101 111 30 1115 3511 57 80 102 1 20101 15 30 145 500 135 80 102 1 10102 4 35 145 550 87 45 000 '1 10102 6 35 145 540 29 45 000 1 10102 7 35 1115 320 17 350 97 45 000 2 10102 3 35 • 145 404 58 . 45 000 1 10102 ! 7 35 145 280 21 410 65 45 000 2 10102 .13 10 145 250 15 300 52 45 000 2 10102 11 10 1115 300 49 320 73 115 000 2 10102 10 35 145 3711 22 470 85 45 000 - 2 1(1102 5 35 145 334 51 384 93 45 000 3 • 10102 8 35 1115 410 41 115 000 1 • 1(1102 9 35 145 234 18 490 69 115 000 2 10102 9 35 145 443 34 490 . 79 45 000 3 10102 10 • 35 145 260 62 • 45 000 1 10102 6 35 145 314 28 45 000 1 UROOKLYN IO 0IST 0101 $11 T1 TGII $12 12 $13 T3 PTOT NIO FT 1(12(11 17 50 90 274 70 1115 000 1 102(11 6 35 680 41 90 1051 90 145 000 2 10201 5 35 680 36 90 720 48 1115 000 2 1(12(11 22 60 90 21111 9 1115 000 1 10201 21 60 90 384 , 40 145 000 1 1(12(11 12 50 90 301 11 145 000 1 10201 8 35 90 370 20 434 69 1115 (100 3 102(11 14 50 90 870 78 1115 000 1 10202 32 160 115 1101 62 260 000 1 102112 30 160 115 1901 89 2202 112 260 000 3 1(1202 211 160 740 17 115 980 44 260 000 2 1(12(12 24 160 750 0 115 ' 260 0(10 1 102(12 22 160 . 115 850 18 1901 85 260 000 2 • 10202 10 60 115 700 18 260 000 1 10202 19 60 115 220 32 1701 69 260 000 2 10202 21 16(1 115 820 23 1321 79 260 000 2 10202 23 16(1 750 23 115 1501 69 260 000 2 10202 17 60 550 3 115 1315 63 1011 75 260 000 3 10202 25 160 530 23 115 268 83 260 000 2 10202 27 160 830 19 115 2502 82 260 000 2 10202 28 16(1 721 27 115 300 11 260 000 2 1(1202 29 160 400 5 115 260 000 1 10202 311 160 595 8 115 260 000 1 • 1(1202 35 160 115 800 11 755 57 260 000 2 1(1202 18 60 115 505 27 560 86 260 0(10 2 10202 17 60 870 17 115 260 000 1 10202 15 60 613 211 115 2302 30 260 000 2 10202 14 60 115 450 54 1305 98 260 000 2 --FILE: NYMASTER- - _ - -- -- - - - PRINCE-TON UNIVERSITY TIME-SHARING=SYST-EM-- --  - - - - - PAGE-004 - - - 1021111 22 60 350 43 144 140 • 000 1 102011 21 60 1411 300 26 334 69 140 000 2 102011 11 55 380 1 144 140 000 1 10204 4 25 180 1 144 180 69 239 125 140 000 2 1 10204 3 55 480 120 1114 140 000 1 • 10204 3 25 144 200 29 354 93 140 000 2 10205 26 95 60 194 0 2110 000 1 . 10205 29 95 280 39 60 374 30 240 000 2 10205 28 95 230 2 60 365 9 240 000 3 10205 , 31 95 60 234- 10 713 54 2110 000 '3 10205 33 95 244 75 60 150 24 240 000 2 10205 ` 28 95 110 37 60 420 ' 52 2110 000 2 10205 25 95 230 2 60 365 9 240 000 1 10205 7 20 170 65 60 427 18 ' 2110 000 2 • 10205 12 125 60 180 38 1115 54 240 000 3 10205 15 125 320 9 60 950 33 240 000 2 10205 25 95 230 66 60 324 6 2110 000 3 10205 26 95 100 77 60 380 18 2110 000 2 10205 28 95 282 81 60 300 0 240 000 2 10205 311 ' 95 60 550 60 2110 000 1 16205 33 95 150. 74 60 190 18 240 000 2 10205 31 95 60 400 57 240 000 1 10205 32 95 60 360 55 400 57 2110 000 , 2 . 10205 25 95 60 500 35 690 45 2110 000 2 10205 211 95 350 51 60 300 ' 35 240 000 3 1(1205 31 95 130 77 60 200 42 240 000 3 10205 33 95 120 2 60 820 60 2110 000 2 10205 35 95 364 10 60 424 24 240 • 000 2 10205 35 95 60 5110 43 240 000 1 • 10205 31 95 234 21 60 350 7 240 000 2 10205 34 95 372 43 60 370 29 240 000 2 102115 21 95 60 214 15 240 000 1 . 10205 23 95 60 120 39 220 54 2110 000 2 10205 33 95 60 350 1 - 240 000 1 • 10206 4 40 54 470 3 150 000 1 10206 5 110 54 702 13 750 29 150 000 2 10206 8 40 511 480 18 150 000 .1 10206 2 UO 440 49 511 625 4 150 000 3 10206 1 40 432 67 54 760 37 1 150 000 2 10206 5 110 700 38 511 436 33 150 000 3 10206 5 40 360 20 54 495 4 150 000 2 10206 7 40 420 60 511 632 1 150 000 2. 10206 12 50 350 68 54 635 3 150 ono 2 10206 16 50 11191 1 54 1201 15 150 000 3 10206 26 60 3111 1 511 720 28 150 000 2 10206 111 50 54 444 0 150 ono 1 10206 14 50 511 1011 36 150 000 1 10206 20 50 54 510 7 150 000 1 10206 23 60 1170 19 54 150 000 1 0 10207 20 35 60 350 57 85 000 . 1 10207 22 30 60 500 44 85 000 1 10207 17 35 318 31 60 360 15 85 ono 2 1020? 15 35 60 290 28 85 000 1 . 10207 13 35 1150 66 60 100 0 300 9 85 000 2 10207 9 20 120 26 60 456 46 85 000 2 • . FILE: NYMASTER PRINCETON UNIVERSITY TIME-SHARING SYSTEM PAGE 005 . 10207 8 20 60 150 13 85 000 1 • 10207 25 30 60 180 24 85 000 1 • 10207 11 35 150 27 60 154 47 85 000 2 . 10208 31 40 55 725 13 80 000 1 • 102118 23 • 40 800 94 55 1596 41 1401 49 80 000- 3 . 10208 23 40 150 73 55 150 25. 80 000 2 10208 23 40 55 40 2 510 49 80 . 000 3 " 10209 9 10 -. - 62 4093 46 60 000 - 1 - . . 10209 11 30 62 400 . 1' 750 16 60 000 2 10209 1 17 30 62 640 27 555 42 60 000 2 10209 , 18 30 650 18 62 60 000 1 10209 33 10 - 575 36 62 1100 47 60 000 2 10209 311' 10 62 1431 49 60 000 1 - • • 10209 .35 10 550 56 65 1201 49 60 000 2 • 10209 14 30 62 850 28 . 60 000 1 ' 10209 13 30 550 33 62 1351 38 60 000 2 10209 15 30 578 57 62 925 28 60 000 2 • . - - 10209 17 30 62 625 . 50 60 - 000 1. 10211 13 40 83 450 54 85 000 1 10211 16 40 . - 83 424 4 85 000 - 1 - ' 10211 15 40 83 525 13 . 525 28 85 000 . 2 ' 10211 14 40 340 59 83 '520 17 85 000 2 ' 10211 11 40 300. 56 83 450 10 • 85 000 3 . 10211 - 2 . 20 83 344 9 85 000 1 ' 10211 4 20 240 - 35 83 300 41 85 000 2 10211 7 20 83 340 56 85 000 1' • 10211 8 20 350 46 83 570 79 85 000 2 111211 10 20 83 407 14 200 56 85 000 3 . . 10211 13 40 344 39 83 204 12 . 85 000 2 . 10211 16 110 83 214 4 85 000 1 ' 10211 17 40 244 25 83 . 540 38 85 000 2 ' - 10211 11 40 83 400 28 451 37 85 000 2 • 10211 18 40 - 83 334 2. 85 000 1 10211 20 110 334 16 83 430 53 85 000 2 • 10211 20 - 110 83 430 53 200 56 85 000' 2 ' 10211 22 25 83 450 5 224 54 85 000 3 • 10211 211 25 291 26 83 430 9 85 000 2 10211 25 25 83 424 63 85 000 1 ' 10211 26 25 270 61' 83 570 77 85 000 2 10211 29 25 410 7 83 85 000 1 10212 ' 8 50 55 400 31 _ • 120 000 1 10212 14 50 55 270 18 3511 29 120 000 3 10212 8 50 380 111 55 120 000 1 . 10212 9 50 - 55 350 8 700 36 120 000 2 . 10212 19 . 50 300 36 55 310• 37 120 000 3 . 10212 14 50 324 30 55 440 51 120 000 2 . .. 10212 12 50 320 43 55 400 28 120 000 3 . 10212 - 6 50 590 3 55 535 15 120 000 2 10212 7 50 210 62 55 570 51 120 ' . 000 2 . 10212 1 50 550 12 55 120 000 1 " 10212 7 . 50 55 760 49 1.20 000 1 10212 8 50 180 45 55 250 0 520 9 120 000 2 10212 9 50 340 61 55 410 13 - 120 000 2 . 10212 12 50 55 591 35 120 000 1 . 10212 20 50 384 72 55 455 35 134 53 120 000 • 2 J - • -FIEF:--NYMASTER - ----- - PRINCET0N- UNIVERSITY-T-IME-SIIARING-SYSTEH- _ _ -- ------- PAGE-006 -- ` __-- - --- -- - 10212 19 50 290 311 , 55 120 •12 360 28 120 000 2 10212 17 50 55 440 11 120 . 000 1 . 10212 16 50 344 69 55 700 54 120 000 2 • . • 10212 27 20 55 810 31 120 000 • 1 10212 . 24 20 55 350 15 470 46 120 000 2 20213 19 100 90 500 58 150 201 1 20213 18 100 83 354 26 150 211 1 • 20213 17 100 470 6 83 150 211 1 20213 17 100 11111 250 2 470 55 150 204 3 - 20213 , 14 100 360 4 55 150 212 1 ' 20213 13 100 314 23 144 150 .204 1 . 20213 ' 13 100 90 3603 53 150 201 1 20213 13 100 55 3603 18 150 212 1 , 20213 12 100 83 465 66 150 211 1 20213 10 50 144 1120 54 150 204 1 . 20213 9 50 90 380 45 150 201. 1 20213 8 50 300 3 1411 2114 32 495 99 150 204 2 20213 5 50 90 560 56 150 201 1 20213 4 50 300 1 144 380 33 150 204 2 20213 3 50 83 200 25 150 211 • 1 20213 3 50 200 3 55 150 212 1 20213 1 50 1114 500 61 150 204 1 20213 20 100 83 370 65 150 211 1 20213 20 100 55 370 37 150 212 1 20213 20 100 144 310 126 • 150 204 A 20213 18 100 310 54 90 480 77 150 201 2 20213 18 100 11111 310 • 0 480 131 150 204 2 • 20213 18 100 310 0 1114 1180 131 150- 204 2 � . 2(1213 18 100 310 61 83 1180 70 150 211 2 . 20213 18 100 310 89 55 1180 42 150 212 2 -20213 16 100 320 43 55 4(14 ' 8 150 212 2 ' . 20213 16 100 320 15 83 404 36 150 211 2 . 20213 16 100 _ 144 320 46 404 97 150 204 2 20213 . 16 10(1 320 46 11111 404 97 150 2011 2 • 20213 16 100 320 -- 8 90 4011 43 150 201 3 20213 15 100 144 490 117 150 204 1 20213 15 100 83 1190 56 150 211 - 1 20213 15 100 55 490 27 150 212 1 • 20213 13 100 360 13 90 500 116 1 150 201 2 20213 13 100 360 41 144 500 104 150 204 2 20213 13 100 144 360 41 500 104 150 204 3 20213 13 . 1111) 360 20 83 500 43 150 211 2 20213 13 1110 360 118 .55 : 500 15 150 212 2 20213 13 100 370 10 90 560 59 150 201 2 20213 .13 100 370 40 144 560 113 • 150 204 2 20213 13 1111) 144 370 40 560 113 150 204 2 20213 13 1(10 370 21 83 560 52 150 211 2 . 20213 13 100 .370 49 55 560 24 150 212 2 20213 .12 1110 90 475 60 150 201 1 20213 12 100 55 710 51 150 212 1 • . 20213 12 100 83 710 79 150 211 1 . 20213 12 1(10 11111 710 140 150 204 1 20213 - 10 100 200 11 83 244 3 150 211 2 ' 20213 10 50 1114 200 118 2114 64 150 204 2 • 20213 10 50 200 6 90 244 -10 . 150 201 2 - - =---- - - ------------- - - - a • FILE: NYMAS1uR PRINCETON UNIVERSITY TIME—ShIARING SYSTEM PAGE 007 20213 8 50 90 450 85 150 201 1 20213 7 50 250 22 55 585 '25 150 212 3 20213 7 50 83 250 6 585 53 150 211 3. 20213 7 50 250 22 55 585 25 150 212 3 20213 7 50 90 250 13 585 60 150 201 '2 20213 7 50 1411 250 67 585 114 - 150 204 3 2(1213 9 50 360 • 57 55 680 40 150 ' 212 2 20213 9 50 360 29 03 680 68 150 211 2 2(1213 9 50 • 144 360 32 680 129 150 204 3 20213 1 9 50 360 22 90 680 75 150 201 2 20213 . 9 50 360 32 144 680 129 150 204 2 20213 10 50 90 300 '- 9 680 75 150 201 3 • 20213 10 50 144 300 63 680 129 150 204 2 20213 10 50 83 300 2 680 68 150 211 2 . 20213 10 50 30l1 26 55 680 40 150 212 2 • 20213 10 50 300 26 55 680 40 150 212 2 20213 11 100 400 • 31 83 160 • 6 150 211 2 • 2(1213 11 100 - 144 400 30 160 67 150 204 2 20213 • 14 100 374 11• 55 670 35 150 212 2 20213 14 100 374 11 55 610 35 150 212 3 2(1213 14 100 83 374 17 670 -63 150 211 3 20213 111 100 144 3]4 78 670 124 150 204 3 20213 111 100 90 374 24 670 70 150 201 2 20213 15 11)0 144 290 30 372 51 150 204 2 20213 19 100 83 506 79 150 211 1 20213 20 100 90 590 62 150 201 1 20213 19 100 55 586 39 150 212 1 . 20213 19 100 • 144 586 128 150 204 1 • 20213 14 100 274 36 83 505 75 150 211 2 20213 14 100 274 26 90 505 82 150 201 2 20213 14 IOU 144 274 25 505 136 150 204 2 • 20213 14 100 274 64 55 505 117 150 212 2 20213 111 100 90 394 '7 150 201 1 20213 13 100 1114 380 105 150 . 204 1 . 20213 13 100 55 380 • 16 150 212 •1 20213 13 1110 83 380 '44 150 211 1 20213 11 1(10 314 37 1411 374 95 ' 150 204 2 • 20213 11 100 144 314 37 374 95 150 204 2 , 20213 11 100 314 52 55 374 6 $ 150 212 2 20213 11 100 ' 314 24 83 374 34 150 211 2 . 20213 11 100 314 17 90 374 '41 150 20) 2 . 20213 10 50 154 51 90 440 5.7' 150 201 3 • ' 20213 10 50 144 1511 3 440 111 150 • 204 3 . . 20213 ' 10 50 154 58 83 440 50 150 211 2. 20213 10 50 154 86 55 1140 22 150 212 2 20213 10 50 1114 580 126 150 204 1 20213 10 50 • 83 580 65 150 211 1 . 20213 10 50 55 580- 37 150 212 1 211213 9 50 250 86 55 1140 41 150 212 2 20213 9 50 250 58 83 440 69 150 211 2 - 20213 9 50 • 144 250 ' 3 1140 130 150 204 2 211213 9 50 250 51 90 '440 76' 150 201 2 20213 6 50 1211' 21 83 31111 26 150 211 2 ' 20213 6 50 144 124 40 3411 87 150 204 2 20213 6 50 124 110 1114 31111 87 150 204 2 W _ -- ----ME;LE; NYMAST H(--- -- PR I NCE-T0N=UN I VERS'1 T.Y=T=1 ME-SITAR I NG=SYSTEM=-- ---- -- -- --___= _--PAGE-008- --- - -- - ' 20213 6 50 124 10 90 344 33 150 201 2 20213 5 50 260 83 55 470 50 150 212 2 20213 5 50 260 55 83 470 78 150 211 2 20213 5 50 144 - 260 6 470 139 150 204 2 20213 5 •50 260 6 1411 470 139 150 204 2 20213 5 50 260 48 90 470 85 150 201 3 20213 ' 4 50 55 680 22 150 212 1 20213 11 50 83 680 50 150 211 1 20213 4 50 144 680 111 150 204 1 20213 1 3 50 144 100 1111 150 204 1 . 20213 , 2 50 90 510 611 150 201 1 20213 1 50 300 60 55 510 32 150 212 3 20213 1 50 144 300 29 510 121 150 2011 2 20213 1 50 300 32 83 510 60 150 211 3 20213 1 50 144 300 29 510 121 150 204 3 20213 I 50 300 25 90 510 67 150 -201 2 20213 4 50 3110 2 1411 350 38 150 204 2 20213 5 50 90 300 . 48 150 201 1 . 20213 5 .50 83 100 59 150 211 1 20213 5 50 144 100 120 150 204 1 20213 5 50 55 100 31 150 212 1 20213 6 50 144 380 8 475 82 150 2011 2 . 20213 6 50 380 53 83 475 21 - 150 211 2 20213 6 50 380 44 90 475 . 28 150 201 3 20213 8 50 90 520 21 150 201 1 20213 9 50 55 675 43 150 212 1 20213 9 50 83 675 71 150 211 1 20213 9 50 1114 615 132 150 204 1 20213 10 50 329 30 90 540 60 150 201 2 20213 10 50 329 611 55 540 25 150 212 2 20213 10 50 329 25 144 540 114 150 204 2 20213 10 51) 329 36 83 540 53 150 211 2 , • 20213 10 50 144 329 25 540 114 150 204 3 20213 11 100 501 8 83 805 9 150 211 3 20213 11 100 1114 501 52 805 70 150 204 • 2 20213 11 100 501 1 90 805 ' 16 • 150 201 2 • 20213 12 100 180 5 83 700 77 150 211 2 20213 12 100 180 33 55 700 49 150 212 2 20213 12 100 • 55 180 27 700 49 150 212 3 .20213 12 100 180 5 83 700 77 150 211 3 20213 12 10(1 180 56 144 700 138 150 204 2 • 20213 12 100 11111 180 56 700 138 150 204 3 20213 12 1110 90 180 , 2 700 84 150 201 3 20213 14 100 90 3110 7 402 37 150 201 2 20213 12 100 90 180 2 700 84 150 201 2 • 20213 111 100 3110 28 55 402 2 150 212 2 20213 111 100 340 28 55 402 2 150 212 2 20213 14 100 83 340 0 402 30 150 211 2 20213 111 100 11111 3110 61 402 91 150 2011 2 20213 15 100 380 10 50 150 212 1 20213 15 100 83 380 18 150 211 1 20213 15 100 144 380 79 150 204 1 - 20213 15 100 90 380 25 ' 150 201 1 20213 13 100 90 560 77 ' 555 73 150 201 2 . 20213 13 100 83 560 70 555 78 150 211 2 - TICE: NYMASIEI( PRINCETON UNIVERSITY TIME-SHARING SYSTEM PAGE 009 20213 13 1(10 55 560 42 555 50 150 212 2 20213 13 100 1114 560 131 555 139 150 204 2 20214 20 60 60 120 21 100 207 1 202111 20 60 55 120 16 100 208 1 202111 12 60 271 4 55 100 208 1 202111 11 60 55 500 10 100 208 1 20214 11 60 60 500 15 100 207 1 202111 23 -20 60 100 52 100 207 1 202111 20 60 55 60 40 100 208 1 20214 i 11 60 250 25 55 234 48 100 408 2 . 20214 11 60 250 18 60 234 53 100 207 3 20214 ' 15 60 55 . 224 14 100 208 1 ; 20214 30 20 60 100 51 100 207 • 1 20214 20 20 114 82 60 550 39 100 207 2 202111 20 21) 1111 87 55 550 34 100 208 2 202111 12 61) 200 3 60 100 207 1 20214 12 60 200 8 55 100 208 1 20214 • 7 20 55 2211 27 320 115 100 • 208 2 202111 7 20 60 224 32 320 50 100 207 2 20214 3 20 184 83 55 300 35 100 408 2 20214 3 20 1811 80 60 300 29 100 207 2 202111 9 20 60 2211 38 100 207 1 202111 9 20 55 224 33 100 208 1 21)215 20 120 115 450 86 620 96 155 202 2 20215 20 12(1 57 450 28 620 38 155 203 3 20215 20 12(1 62 1150 33 620 43 155 209 2 20215 20 121) 60 1150 31 620 41 155 205 2 20215 20 120 511 1150 25 620 35 155 206 2 20215 20 120 115 360 4 155 202 1 20215 5 120 284 84 57 375 20 155 203 2 20215 5 120 2811 26 115 '3/5 78 155 202 3 20215 5 120 2811 81 60 375 23 155 205 2 20215 5 120 2811 8 7 511 375 18 155 . 206 2 • 20215 5 12(1 2811 79 62 3 75 25 155 209 2 • 20215 11 120 62 1051 47 155 209 1 20215 I 120 11110 28 62 280 17 155 209 2 20215 1 120 440 36 54 280 9 155 206 3 2(1215 1 120 11110 30 60 280 15 155 205 3 20215 1 120 115 440 25 280 70 155 202 2 , 20215 1 120 440 33 57 280 12 155 203 2 20215 1 120 11110 25 115 280 70 155 202 2 20215 1 120 57 620 115 155 203 1 2(1215 6 120 115 625 71 500 84 155 202 3 20215 6 120 57 625 • 13 500 26 155 203 2 ' 20215 6 120 54 625 11 500 23 155 206 2 20215 6 120 62 625 18 500 31 155 209 2 20215 9 120 62 780 47 155 209 1 20215 9 120 54 700 51 155 206 1 20215 9 120 60 780 45 155 205 1 . 2(1215 9 120 115 780 100 155 202 1 20215 9 120 57 780 42 155 203 1 2(1215 1 120 62 680 44 155 209 1 20215 1 120 60 680 42 155 • 205 1 2(1215 1 120 57 680 39 155 203 1 20215 1 120 115 334 61 1065 92 155 202 3 • • • FILE:- NYMASTER- --- --� -.PRINCE.-T0N-UNtFVERSI=TY=T-IME-SNARING-SYSTEM =-_-- --- -- - - PAGE-010 - - 20215 1 120 60 334 6 , 1065 37 155 . 205 2 20215 1 120 54 334 0 1065 31 155 206 3 20215 1 120 62 334 8 1065 39 155 209 2 . 20215 1 120 57 3311 • 3 1065 34 155 203 2 20215 0 35 • 62 550 24 1601 56 155 209 2 • 20215 0 35 57 550 ' 19 1601 51 155 203 2 20215 0 35 115 550 17 1601 107 155 202 2 20215 0 35 60 550 22. 1601 54 155 . 205 2 20215 0 35 511 550 16 1601 48 155 206 2. 20215 , 8 35 62 350 8 805 38 155 209 2 20215 8 35 54 350 0 805 30 155 206 2 20215 � 8 . 35 60 350 6 805 36 155 205 2 20215 8 35 115 350 61 805 91 155 202 2 20215 8 35 57 350 ' 3 805 33 155 203 2 • 20215 7 35 294 32 62 350 • 8 155 209 3 20215 7 35 2911 40 54 350 0 155 206 2 20215 7 35 2911 34 60 350 6 155 205 3 20215 7 35 .. 294 21 115 350 '61 155 ' 202 2 • 20215 7 35 294 43 57 350 3 155 203 3 20215 7 35 115 294 21 350 61 155 202 3 20215 5 35 54 400 25 155 206 1 , 20215 5 . 35 . 115 400 74 155 202 1 20215 4 . 35 380 16 62 200 14 155 209 2 • 20215 4 35 380 24 54 ' 200 6 155 206 2 211215 4 35 380 18 60 200 12 155 205 2 20215 4 35 380 37 115 200 67 155 202 2 , 20215 4 35 380 21 57 200 9' 155 203 2 20215 3 35 280 10 62 750 . 42 155 209 . 2 20215 3 35 280 22 511 750 34 155 206 ' 2 - 20215 3 35 280 16 60 750 40 155 205 2 . 20215 3 35 115 280 • 39 750 95 155 • 202 2 20215 3 35 280 19 57 750 37 155 •• 203 2 20215 2 35 2110 35 62 1151 58 155 209 3 2(1215 2 35 240 43 54 1151 53 ' 155 206 , 2 . 20215 2 35 115 240 - 18 1151 111- 155 202 3 20215 2 35 2110 37 60 1151 44 , .155 205 3 . 20215 2 35 240 40 57 1151 53 155 203 _ 3 . • 20215 4 35 '62 100 '2 . 600 26 155. 209 2 • 20215 4 ' 35 100 6 54 600 18 I 155 - 206 3 20215 4 35 - 60 100 0 600 24 155 205 2 • 20215 4 35 100 3 57 600 19 155 203 2 . 20215 4 35 115 100 55 600 79 155 202 2 ' 20215 5 35 115 190 18 1601 57 155 203 2 20215 , 7 35 57 • 20215 1 35 . 115 1190 , 75 1601 115 155 202 2 20215 7 35 60 490 21 1601 60 155 205 2 20215 7 35 62 119,0 23 1601 62 155 209 2 20215 7 35 54 1190 15 1601 55 155 206. 2 20215 8 35 200 57 62 550 .23 155 209 3 20215 . 8 35 200 72 54 550 15 • 155 206 2 • 20215 8 35 200 65 60 550 21 155 205 3 20215 8 35 200 10 115 550 76 155 202 2 20215 8 35 200 69 57 550 18 155 203 3 20215 9 35 400 28 62 490 ' 7 155 209 2 • 20215 9 - 35 115- 400 25 490 60 155 __ 202_____2 _______ -_� • - -- _ • ---- L FILE: NYMASIER PRINCETON UNIVERSITY TIME-SHARING SYSTEM PAGE 011 20215 9 35 1100 30 60 490 5 155 205 2 20215 9 35 400 33 57 490 ' 2 155 203 2 , 20215 8 35 115 695 ' 31 155 202 1 . 20215 9 35 54 650 30' 155 206 .1 . 20215 12 120 475 9 60 800 15 ' 155 205 2' 2(1215 12 120 ' 475 15 54 800 9 155 206 2 - . 20215 12 120 • 115 475 46 800 70 155 202 3 ' 20215 12 120 1175 14 '57 800 12 155 203 .2 ' 20215 12 12(1 475 7 62 800 17 155" 209 2 202.15 14 120 60 460 1. 155 205 1 • 20215 ' 14 120 62 460 3 155 209 1' " 20215 * 15 120 57 330 : 7 155 203 1 20215 18 120 54 400 ' 32 155 206 1 . • 20215 18 120 115 520 47 155 202 1 . 20215 19 120 60 270 55 155 205 1 . 20215 19 120 115 270 98 155 202 1 20215 19 120 62 210 57. 155 209 1 20215 16 120 321 52 57 1160 . 9 155 203 2 - 20215 ' 16 120 • 115 230 6 460 , 65 155 '202 2 - 2(1215 16 120 321 47 60 460 12 155 205 2 . 211215 16 120 321 55 54 460 6 155 206 -3 20215 16 120 321 ' 47 62 460 .14 155 209 - 3 20215 20 120 115 390 30 155 202 1 . 20215 19 12(1 115 430 64 155 202 1 . 20215 18 120 180 18 115 460 29 155 202 3 • . 20215 16 120 115 . 320 -6 460 67 155 '202 2 20215 15' 120 115 324 31 " 155 202 1 20215 14 120 57 320 8 155 203 1 • 20215 13 120 280 30 115 390 7 155 202 2 . 20215 12 12(1 450 7 60 155 205 1 . :20215 11 120 115 300 61. 1.55 .202 1 - 20215 14 120 670 3 54 155 • 206 1 . 20215 14 120 62 670 5 155 209 1 • 20215 15 12(1 54 800 36 • 155 206 1 20215 " 15 120 60 870 •30 155 205 1 . ' 2(1215 15 - 120 57 870 21 155 203 1 . . . 20215 19 120 430 62 57 1651 116' 155 203 ' 2 . • 211215 19 120 430 5 115 1651 1011 155 202 3 - 20215 19 120 430 60 60 1651 . 49 1 155 205 2 ' 20215 19 120 430 58 62 1651 51 155 209 2 • . YONKERS . ID DIST 0101- 71$ Ti 'oh T2$ .T2. T3$ T3 PTOT N10 FT - ' • 10303 - 19 45 78 663 53 90 000 1 . ' . 1(13(13 5 45 421 57 78 498 •42 90 • 000 2 103(13 8 45 213 4 78 90 000 1 ' • 10303 1 45 78 748 20 90. 000 1 10303 11 45 633 3 78 • 90 000 1 - . 10303 17 45 78 810 58 90 000 1 ' • W� • FILE: NYMASI_Elt__ _ PRI_NCETON-_UNIVERSITY TIME-SHARING SYSTEM = - -- - - PAGE O 12 - - -20304 29 29 55 78 5117 14 220 303 1 • 20304 27 55 503 3 66 220 305 1 • 20304 25 55 78 548 7 220 303 1 ' 20304 11 80 493 9 78 .220 303 1 20304 12 80 66 473 .30 220 305 1 20304 2 85 78 728 '48 220 303 1 20304 13 80 78 848 43 220 303 .1 ' 20304 12 80 66 915 44 220 305 1 20304 12 80 66 838 31 220 305 1 20304 6 85 698 10 78 220 303 1 • • 20304 ' 14 80 66 1078 42 220 305 1 203114 . 5 85 608 12 78 220 303 1 . - 203(14 15 80 78 918 : 49 220 303 1 2030427 55 578 3 66 220 . 305 1 • 20304 13 80 78 393 23 220 303 1 • - 203(14 10 85 66 808 '30 220 305 1 203114 9 85 78 698 16 • 220 303 1 20304 6 85. . 66 658 2 220 305 1 20304 7 85 78 698 20 220 303 1 2031)4 8 85 568 .1 78 790 54 220 303 2 20304 8 85 568 13 66 790 42 220 305 2 ° 10305 19 85 450 45 66 198 27 155 000 3 . 10305 25 10 - 283 54 66 458 7 155 000 3 10305 15 85 66 398 39 578 40 155 000 2 10305 20 85 448 2 66 • 155 000 1 10305 8 60 66 400 '45 155 000 1 " 10305 5 ' 60 383 52 66 448 19 155 • 000 2 10305 13 85 698 48 66 283 8 155 000 2 ' 10305 15 85 66 578 19 155 000 1 10305 10 60 66 968 . 36 • 155 - 000 1 10305 1 60 66 398 20• 38 (41 155 000 2 10305 14 85 66 413 28 • 155 000 1 10305 16 85 428 16 66 513 17 155' 000 2 • 10305 14 80 66 205 46 333 57 155 000 2 - 16305 11 85 66 548 18 155 000 1 . 10305 15 85 66 398 33 . 155 000 1 ORONX ID 01S1 1110T 11$ T1 TG11 T2$ T2 T3$ T3 PT0T DID FT 104112 16 70 73 10 70 120 000 1 10402 20 70 220 28 73 911 40 120 000 2 10402 21 30 ' 73 140 57 120 000 1 10402 15 70 1 13 73 50 30 120 000 3 10402 9 20 120 73 73 1 27 120 . 000 2 " • 10402 15 70 73 110 63 120 000 1 " ' 10402 20 70 270 43 73 . 10 5 120 ' 000 2 10402 21 30 500 17 73 1 .65 120 000 2 ' 10402 20 70 24 14 73 1 - 64 120 000 2 10402 21 30 73 200 1.7 150 56 120 000 3 l • • FILE; NYMAS(EI( PRINCETON UNIVERSITY TIME-SHARING SYSTEM PAGE 013 20403 / 5 1 31 73 20 28 40 1102 2 20403 1 5 1 33 71 20 26 40 405 ' 2 .20403 1 5 1 54 50 20 5 40 404 2 20403 16 5 50 195 '11 40 404 1 . 20403 16 5 73 195 33 40 402 1 21)1103 16 5 1 7 50 200 113 40 11011 2 . 2(1111)3 16 5 71 1 14 200 64 110 405 2 . 20403 16 5 73 1 16 200 66 40 402 2 20403 19 5 1 211 73 830 63 40 402 2 20403 17 5 1 47 50 830 40 40 4011 2 20403 ' 11 5 71 830 61 40 405 1 . 20403 • 18 5 50 90 '9 1 47 40 1104 ' 2 20403 18 5 71 90 36 1 61 110 1105 2 r. 20403 18 • 5 73 ' 90 32 1 70 40 402 2 20403 19 5 71 614 15 1 65 40 1105 2 20403 19 • 5 614 6 50 1 38 110 404 . 2 20403 19 5 73 614 17 1 61 40 402 2 20403 19 5 73 20(10 113 218(1 61 110 402 ' 2 20403 19 5 50 2000 20 2180 38 40 404 2 20403 19 5 71 20(10 41 2180 59 40 405 2 20403 20 5 422 33 71 350 52 110 405 2 . 20403 20 5 422 52 50 350 31 40 404 2 . 20403 20 5 1122 29 73 350 54 40 402 2 • 211403 21 0 73 955 12 950 27 40 402 2 20403 21 1) 955 11 50 950 4 40 4114 2 204103 21 lJ 73 • 1 28 190 57 40 402 3 20403 21 0 11 955 10 950 25 40 405 2 204(13 • 21 (1 50 1 5 190 34 40 1104 3 . 20403 21 0 71 1 26 190 55 40 405 2 204113 24 0 220 5 73 70 114 110 402 2 20403 24, 0 220 28 50 10 21 110 404 2 ' 2111103 24 11 220 7 71 10 42 40 405 3 . , 20403 25 0 13 290 ' 7 1 38 40 402 2 20403 25 0 290 16 50 1 15 110 11(14 2 201103 25 0 71 290 5 1 36 110 405 2 20403 26 0 1 42 73 136 67 110 402 3 20403 26 0 1 65 50 136 44 40 404 3 20403 26 ll 1 44 71 136 65 110 405 2 20403 12 5 11 451) 60 1(0 405 1 20403 12 5 50 450 39 ' 40 404 1 204(13 12 5 73 450 62 110 1102 1 20403 9 5 9304 36 73 8406 22 40 1102 2 204113 9 5 93011 38 71 84(16 19 - 40 405 2 20403 10 5 1301 511 71 1800 70 110 1105 2 20403 10 5 1301 75 50 18(10 49 40 404 2 20403 2 5 485 65 50 500 43 40 11011 2 20403 2 5 485 1111 71 500 64 _ 40 405 2 201103 2. 5 485 112 73 500 66 40 1102 2 20403 2 5 380 60 73 195 65 40 402 2 . 20403 2 5 380 83 50 195 42 40 1104 2 • 20403 2 5 380 62 71 195 63 40 405 2 10404 12 20 1114 24 50 50 16 45 000 2 104(14 13 20 321) 69 50 40 311 45 000 2 101104 14 20 330 75 50 1 29 115 000 2 10404 14 20 242 85 50 1 7 45 000 3 FILE: NYMASIEO PRINCETON UNIVERSITY TIME—SHARING SYSTEM - PAGE 014 • i 104114 15 20 850 23 50 1 4 45 000 2 1040416 201085 89 50 1 42 45 000 2 10404 17 20 234 17 50 • 1 7 45 000 2 10404 19 20 110 5 50 1 4 45 000 2 10404 11 20 1631 63 50 1 4 45 000 3 10404 7 25 1 10 50 34 42 45 000 2 10404 2 25 30 61 50 1 36 121 40 45 000 2 a 10404 5 25 160 30 50 1 ' 6 50 18 45 000 2 10404 , 6 25 550 23 50 1 4 45 000 3 104011 12 20 14 17 50 15 32 45 000 2 10405 • 16 40 ' 71 400 65 55 000 1 101105 14 40 34 68 71 1 25 55 000 2 10405 13 40 3011 17 71 360 37 55 000 2 10405 9 15 71 340 1 55 000 1 10405 11 40 390 5 71 1 22 55 000 2 • 10405 10 15 128.7 50 71 1 25 55 000 3 10405 50 15 790 9 71 1 25 55 000 2 10405 11 40 134 55 71 130 44 55. 000 2 10405 8 15 240 13 71 55 ,000 1 10405 4 15 54 4 71 1 25 55 000 2 104116 15 90 56 450 '5 195 000 1 10406 13 90 110 2 56 570 53 195 000 .2 101106 6 55 280 35 56 114 30 195 000 2 101106 3 55 56 300 29 195 000 1 1(1406 3 55 180 48 56 180 4 725 49 195 000 2 101106 11 90 220 68 56 220 4 195 000 3 10406 12 90 324 56 56 500 37 195 00o 2 10406 20 90 330 52 56 94 21 195 000 2 ' 10406 32 50 56 444 7 195 000 1 . 10406 27 50 200 83 56 430 31 195 000 2 10406 26 50 150 5 56 • 224 .2 680 14 195 000 3 10406 19 90 390 90 56 670 22 195 000 2 . 10406 18 90 400 10 56 195 000 1 10406 14 90 56 555 25 195 000 1 10406 11 90 • 56 570 29 195 000 1 10406 14 90 224 84 56 450 49 195 000 2 10406 20 90 56. 532 12 195 000 1 10406 12 90 56 190 23 4110 24 195 000 2 I. 10406 11 90 390 69 56 195 000 • 1 104116 9 55 56 270 23 200 56 195 000 .2 . 10406 1 55 495 2 56 521 9 195 000 3 10406 2 55 . 56 480 8 195 000 1 10406 9 55 56 23(1 30 430 44 195 000 2 1(1406 12 90 304 75 56 335 • 18 195 000 2 1(14(16 22 50 56 260 12 450 20 195 000 3 10406 11 90 56 350 30 195 000 1 104(16 12 90 56 174 41 195 000 1 10406 13 90 250 72 56 430 54 195 000 2 10406 14 90 270 13 56 460 '.12 195 000 2 10406 21 50 56 210 9 364 21 195 000 2 1(U106 33 50 1 24 56 67 34 195 000 3 1(1407 3 10 108 380 570 74 200 (100 2 101101 4 . 10 108 350 61 • 200 000 1 101107 • 21 50 320 22 108 450 66 200 000 2 - 10407 20 80--260 -----2-1-—108-- -380 - -17 465 - 53 200 - 000 — —2 —--- — -- I PAGE 015 • • GETON UNIVERSITY IiME- SIIARING SYSTEM • `�, PRIN 1 C.200 000 1 NYIgAS1Elt 86 200 000 0 2 lU8 550 69 200 000 2 380 21111 3 17 19 80 •340 12 jna 250 26 5110 95 2 0 000 2 • 11 21 li 23 510 111E `20 37 190 91) 200 000 000 1 26 404 27 108 j2 36 2110 0100 1 pi 111 Ell jpB 290 ,12 20 000 2 107 12 2 70 280 16 108 450 02 78 200 000 1 t 0 07 4 20 1 108 tt20 47 5 2111 000 1 14 7 111 �0 338 15 µ)8 t130 51 94 85 2110 000 1 000 1 21 5ll 108 '0 25 2110 000 2 d101 22 108 t52 41 200 14U 1 460 1 � 0 2110 000 `r_. 23 a 1 '040 18 80 108 419 20 200 pop 1 114117 16 310 19 108 450 45 2 0 000 1 A 811 64 [1g117 OU108 4G11 20p O110 1 4• lNlgl 19 Ill 108 184 3� 200 000 2 IINIOi l028 000 8 7p lU0 36020 13 200 3 1pg07 • 2 201 0U0 1 �.: lu4l)i 11 j0 108 490 40 000 j111t07 1(139 2 0 of 0 2 6 ip 391► 19 1080B 421I 050 74 200 p00 2 1107 6 0 jt1 300 q0p 105 BB 2110 2 1p4lll lU8 37 OUO 1 1(1401 11 80 108 550 56 • 2(10 000 i01101 11 811 3 9 108 200 000 1 200 10a 1�510 14 200 • 1 10401 040 2 80 73t( 10B 200 0(10 2 j11g111 23 �U 620 2u0 p110 2 92 1011117 �i11 1118 1130 21 000 2 l 040 21 po 108 424 43• 2 0 n o 11)I1(11 II 811 10 108 2OB pop 1 1 tt 310 108 450 i l 2(l0 3 1p4u7 t70 22 21 4111 200 U00 1 104111 12 22t1 1p 108 510 q41 56 0% 1 1p4U7 19 10 108 400 15 200 pop . 1t1407 i0 1118 424 21 200 000 3 1p4117 �' 80 lll8 200 4oi 1 10380 3 1pqu1 p0 108 tllp 33 1Up 407 V. l b 5 34 108 39 1 g0 1106 3 10407 21 30 189 108 410 9 124 69• 180 1 j04117 108 180 407 2 1t)11111 25 56 3160 17 160 t107 2 204U8 31 43 q00 70 t06 21 30 2y p 108 18p I01 2 2ptt118 21 97 1 • 204p8 20 100 1ti 156 350 95 180 406 - 1 2p4118 11111 335 3011 19 • 180 I06 1Ull 35 38 156 6. 181 2 2p408 t5 I130 40 2111j1►8 18 �p 450 33 ii65 108 180 tt06 2 2o4 Vi 15 1110 108 550 ►,65 56 18p 1j07 2 204p8100 1156 55o 94 110 406 1 201(08 16 lUU 220 19 180 180 ij07 1 2U4 �� 1011 110 1 106 180 407 2 I ` 5 BB 2tl t 3 31 12 108 90 4 1 p 407 2 10 too I1 i9 40 204U8 2 50 108 350 I 18 406 3 2011(18 II 50 1UB 21 180 211t1118 K 50 �aii 31 . 9 108 ij1 30 • T- ' - z 901t OBI T hi 055 95 65 46E 001 61 8040Z • Z Loh ogl 99 055 801 L 46E out 61 , 11040Z t 904 00l 1• 505 95 001 gl 0040a • t 1011 081 E5. 505 801 001 91 8040Z Z 904 081 94 055 95 55 09E (JUl II OOlOZ Z Loh oet 86 055 got E 09E out Ll 0UhUZ a Loh O91 E6 019 L haZ got 001 It oohoZ a 904.. 091 th 019 95 54 haz out El 0040a • Z LO11 081 19 6LE OE h9E Sol 0(11 al 00Itua • Z 904 Ogl 6 6LE 95 ZZ ' 49E 001 ' al Bobu a LOt) (Mt t9 45Z II Let Sot 001 It 004Ua ' Z 90h 001 6 h5Z 95 Ill La 001 ll B(1h0Z • I LUh 091 LB 015 8Ut 05 6 9049Z E 904 001 SE . 015 95 • 01 Ohh 05 6 8o40Z Z LOU 08t E9 ., 1 901 5 UZE 115 8 guhoZ Z 904 Ogt It 49E 95 L5 ' OZE OS 8 oo40Z Z LOh OBI Li 119E 801 5Z I9Z u01 It 1040a - ' l Loh 0Bl Z OSZ BUt . 001 hl 8040a Z LOh 08l 65 5g9 5 555 8Ul utit 5l on'UZ f 904 OBI L 599 95 Lh 555 1101 51 . 8040a Z L04 0B1 of 001 - got ah5Z 0ul gl 0040a I 904 OBl 9Z, OLS 95 . 001 61 9ohUa Z 904 08t SE 009 al 4E4 95 of ZZ 8040a Z Oh OM. LB 009 49 4E4 BOt OE ZZ 80402 t 904 0B1 O1 095 95 0Ol OZ 8040a I LOh 08t Sl • OUt got 001 LI goUOZ 1 904 091 8E -099 55 001 91 0040a Z Loh 001 95 ZEh t 0lE BUl 9E O1Z 001 51 90I,Ua a 904 . 08t h.. ZEh 95 15 otE 001 51 0040a t L04 0Bt' E9 . 094 got 001 E1 UU40a . t ' LOh O9t L5 5EZ 90t 05 , 5 9uhoa. • E 904 081 LZ 00L 95 OL hoz 05 t Bohua t Loh " 001 49 ' 61 f 8Ut 05 f guh0a Z -904 081 al. • 61E 95 94 005 05 E 110(l0a Z • LOI4 ' Oat , 89 004 h 0?E " g0t 05 ' 5 Buh(Z Z 904 081 . 91 • 004 95 94 oZE OS 5 ' .90408 Z LOh oel 50 . 015 6 05E 801 05 L Bu4t1Z . "a 904 081 Et 015 95 6E 05E 05 L 9040e Z Loh" out SE 064 got 6 ugh 05 L BOhoa t 904 Oet I 065 95 - u5 B 9040a Z Loh 08t 9g 095 9Z: 044 got o0.1 El . 9040Z Z 904 (IBl gh ,095 95 9Z 044 001 al 11u4ua l Loh 091 66' 055 got 001 Lt Wawa t 904 08t L4 055 95. 001 LI , 8040Z Z Loh O91 - ' Z9 ot5 901 ZE 89f 001 61 B0h(1Z Z 904 oet Zh 015 95 EL 09E 00t 61 ' gOhoZ a LO4 UN f9 49a It • fa5 got 0E la 004(1Z • Z 904 OBl lE 49Z 95 14 . 5Z5 0E lZ 8040a a 904 0111 E4 045 95 4 "to of ZZ gohoZ Z LO1t 001 56 O45 gh hg got 0E OZE OE ZZ g01)UZ • 1 904 04.t 95 g LOG OE 11Z 904UZ • • E L04 OBI E01 5611 19 00a Sot 05 Ut 0040a • Z 904 091 l5 564 6 . 00Z " 95 05 6 BOht1Z Z Loh 00l 58 ZSZ got t 00E 05 B 9040Z a 904 00l ' fE Z5a 95 55 OOE 05 g gohlZ _-.,, . , -: -_- — 9_t 0-.3Jdd--_.-__-- -.___- W3YSJlSL-.ON I"l1VIIs-3W 1=1,41-IS113A"1 N1141013001 N.9'-- .------ - - -- - -- -" - -f 31 svwAN 1311 - - - • E: 3IT 11 ( 28 Pages ) t Group Homes for the _ . Mentally Retarded :. An Investigation of Neighborhood Property Impacts - - Dr. Julian Wolpert Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International. Affairs Princeton University August 31, 1978 CITY FEB 2 41988 BUhLD1NG/L0NING DEPT. c ` c I � i - • • • GROUP HOMES FOR THE MENTALLY RETARDED: AN INVESTIGATION OF • NEIGHBORHOOD PROPERTY IMPACTS III ° Dr. Julian Wolpert • Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs Princeton University August 31, 1978 • Additional Copies available from: •I Bureau of Public Education Office of Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities 44 Holland Avenue Albany, New York 12229 I, I)- "Group Homes for the Mentally Retarded: An Investigation of Neighborhood Property Impacts" was a study conducted for the New York State Office - of Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities • Suggested Citation: Wolpert, J. Group homes for the mentally retarded: An investigation of neighborhood property impacts. Unpublished manuscript, Princeton University, 1978. Reprinted April, 1982 I ' Nei rD II Grateful acknowledgement is made to the three I�! research assistants (Stuart Breslow, Michael Schill I' I and David Schultz) who collected and processed the field study data. The research effort has also benefitted from assistance provided by staff members of the Office of Mental Retardation and by numerous city and municipality officials in the sample com munities. cl • II 1 , I I • Executive Summary The group home impact study was carried out during. the period May through August 1978, in 42 communities within ten New York State cities which had experienced sitings of group homes for mentally retarded people. A matched sample of an additional 42 neighborhoods was selected for com- . parison purposes• within the ten cities. Field observation of sites accompanied the collection of socio-economic and housing data for the communities and property transaction data for neighboring properties coded by their distance from the group home or control site. In all, data on 754 property transactions were analysed in the vicinity of group homes and 826 in the control areas. Of these totals, 92 neighbors of group homes and 89 neighbors of control sites experienced before and after sales relative to the establishment of the homes so that property value trends could be analysed. Similarly, 153 neighboring properties of group homes and 178 neighboring properties of control sites were sold in the twelve month period following the establishment of the homes, so that property turnover rates could be analysed.. Findings of the analyses are summarized below and explained in greater detail within the body of the report. The analysis of the siting of group homes for the mentally retarded in ten New York upstate and downstate communities has indicated: 1 - No evidence of neighborhood "saturation," i.e. , over-representa- tion within any given type of community or city; . 2 - Generally, the group homes are consistent with, and compatible with, neighboring properties in type and size of structure. • 3 - Generally, group home function is not conspicuous.; • 4 - Group home maintenance is generally better than surrounding prop erties e.( g, outward appearance, landscaping, etc.) ; and 5 - Group home residents generally are not visible or noticeable from the street. • With respect to the impact of grouphomes on surrounding g properties;: • 1. - Property values in communities with group homes had the same • increase (or decrease) in market prices as in matched control areas; 2 - Proximity of neighboring properties to a group home did not signi- ficantly affect their market values; 3. - The immediately adjacent properties did not experience propertyi value declines; and 4 - Establishment of the-group homes did not generate a higher degree of neighboring property turnover than in the matched control. i • TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1 Introduction 3 Literature Review 6 Objectives and Goals 7 Selection of Sample Communities - • 10 Procedures e1 • • 12 Data Sources . 13 Statistical Analysis 25 The Sample Neighborhoods 57 Appendix • • • • Introduction 4 • The success of programs designed to' return mentally handicapped people to their community of origin in' a least restrictive setting. is highly dependent upon community reaction to the siting of residential facilities. Communitie's which are already stratified by life cycle groupings, socio-economic status and race are concerned with maintaining or reinforcing relative homogeneity ;of population within their communities. Zoning and other land use planning efforts focus on excluding the "non-conforming" land uses which threaten neighborhood • stability and the maintenance of quality of residential life.' The inner and outer suburbs: of metropolitan areas have been especially • prone to exclusionary zoning practices. It is primarily these areas which have had a serious under representation of mentally handicapped people among their, residents. Considerable research points to the fact that upwardly mobile middle •' class families have found it most difficult in the past to keep their mentally handicapped members at home. These are communities, as well, in which a very considerable proportion of the family assets are tied up in the home. The price of these -homes must increase, at least at the inflationary rate,for . the family to- enjoy financial peace of- mind. -These communities are- also "family oriented", so that non-traditional or non-intact, family constellations are assumed to be detrimental to neighborhood social well-being. The attitude of a community toward the placement of a group home for handicapped people in its midst is a highly complex matter to unravel. A . _detailed and comprehensive study involving a sample survey of households, ' . community groups and leaders and public officials would normally be necessary in order to acquire sufficient depth of detailed 'information to gauge the expected impact. Instead, a tradition has developed in impact studies which -1- -2- • focus upon property values and property turnover rates as key indicators of the • • strength of community attitudes toward the establishment of group houses which become. translated into household relocation decisions.. If, for example, the group home siting. is perceived as a "normal" event, then the-occupants in the residences•are accepted neutrally, or as assets to. the community and • neighborhood in the same manner as a traditional family. The group home's entry into the neighborhood would not trigger off unanticipated relocation . decisions by neighbors, and purchase price of new homes would not be affected significantly by the addition of, the group home. Property values and turnover rates would be affected solely by general marketplace considerations. If, on -the other hand, neighborhood reactions are severely negative, then announcement of the group home siting might be accompanied by precipitous decisions to move away and sell residential properties even at a reduced price. The neighborhood spillover effect could be measurel by. the decline in sale prices• below anticipated values, i.e. at a relative loss in comparison to comparable neighborhoods not experiencing such sitings. The use of .these indicators .is assumed, therefore, to be a catchall of the behavioral response of neighbors. and, therefore, a reasonably sensible barometer. of impacts. These measures have disadvantages associated with thei: .use as indicators but a careful and rigorous analysis of property value effects over a cross-section of different kinds of communities can provide a valuable information stream which is useful to guide officials who site facilities as well as resident groups in the rele vent communities. • 9 .i Literature Review The literature contains two, previous studies which had important influ- ence on the direction the current project took. The• first is Michael Dear's Ph.D. dissertation published as. "Impact of Mental Health Facilities on Property Values" (Community Mental Health Journal, 1977) and the second is, • "The Effect of Siting Group Homes on the Surrounding Environs" by Stuart ; Breslow (Unpublished, 1976). The Dear study sought empirically to test the popular perception that mental health facility siting led to a decline in surrounding property values. ' Two propositions were set down: Proposition' 1. The introduction of a mental health facility in a neighborhood will have a detrimental impact on property transactions; in the neighborhood: (a) The number of transactions will increase; (b) The value of transactions will decrease.Proposition 2. . That any impact, if it can be attributed to the • facility will decline with increased distance from that facility. " Dear chose a representative sample of 12 small outpatient centers in Phila- delphia to test these propositions. He defined_ neighborhoods around these facilities (six block radius) and established control areas free from social service facilities. Dear then collected data on property transactions and. conducted a field survey in these defined areas. Dear found, with respect to Proposition 1, that while there was some increase in property market activity in the impact areas, the anticipated decline in. property value did not materialize. He concluded that 'the effect on property value of mental health facility location is indeterminate." With respect to the second propostion, Dear concluded that "The general ins igni- ficance of the distance variable suggests that mental health facilities were not primarily responsible for the property market movements in their vicinity. " -3- • -4 •- The Breslow study similarly sought to test the perception that mental health facility siting has a detrimental effect on surrounding property value. Breslow selected a sample of 17 community-based mental health facili-' ties in White Plains, reflecting different levels of facility saturation and a variety of community types. Following Dear, impact neighborhood (on a smaller two to three block scale) and controls were defined and data on property transactions were obtained from the local Real Estate Directory. . Further, a field survey of all facilities was conducted. Property values for six months-before and three years after each facility opened were charted. The general trend of property values was found to be • upward (undiscounted for inflation) . The rate of property turnover in the sample areas six months before and three years after each facility opened was compared with the rate of turnover for similar periods in the control areas. • _ The results of this analysis were found to be "interesting but inconclusive" primarily because of the divergent rates of turnover in the two control areas. Overall, the continued rise in property values indicated, according to Breslow, that families with similar socioeconomic backgrounds were continuing to buy homes in the -communities in which facilities were located. Breslow concluded that "The effect of siting residential facilities is no.t negative. Communities can absorb a limited number of group homes without noticeable or measurable property or transaction effects." • Other studies were of lesser importance in the current project design. These included "The Influence of Halfway Houses and Foster Care Facilities Upon . Property Values," City of Lansing (Michigan) Planning Department October 1976 • -5- "Effects of Halfway Houses on Neighborhood Crime Rates and Property Values: A Preliminary Study," Judith Hecht, Depart of. Corrections, District of Columbia, 1970. • "The Social Impact of Group Homes A Study of Small Reside! Service-Programs in First Residential Areas," Eric Knowle at Ronald Baba, Green Bay (Wisconsin) Planning Commission, 197: • • • • • i . Objectives and Goals The study of property impacts is designed to provide a more compre- hensive analysis over a wider range of communities than has been carried out in previous attempts. The study builds upon the earlier work by this investi- gator in Westchester County, New York, and in the Philadelphia metropolitan area. The focus of this study is a more concentrated one, however, with our attention limited to the siting of group homes for the mentally retarded . within a representative set of New York State communities. Moore specifically, the objectives of the study are to: 1) determine the impact of recently sited group homes on the property value and property turnover rates of neighboring residences; 2) provide documentation of property impacts across a sample of New York State communities which differ in terms of life cycle characteristics of residents, socio-economic status and ethnic and/or racial composition; 3) provide a summary .of property impact studies which had been carried on elsewhere and are documented in the research literature. -G- 13 • • • Selection of Sample. Communities • • Sample communities have been selected which are considered to be tre resentativte of nei hborhoodd in which� P g group homes have been sited .in the ;'past several years, as well as likely types of neighborhoods to be targeted! the. future. The plan was to have the sample survey over-represent j, ,communities which are suburban,and with single family use of housing, to focus . ,on neighborhoods which l are predominantly in the middle income category and to 11 (weight the study more heavily on "Down State",. Long Island and the more sub- 'Urban zones of New York City. Preference was also given to communities in Which there are already at least two to three group homes, to avoid the bias; of unique incidents. The list of communities includes the following: • Syracuse (3). Buffalo (6) Kingston (3) Hempstead (2) Valley Stream (2) - Bronx (9) • Brooklyn (17) Yonkers. (3) Albany (2) Troy (5) This sample includes ten communities which had a total of 52 homes as of March 19, 1978, as reported by the DMR computer directory. i • -7- ig • TABLE 1 : Population and Housing Conditiona in Group Home and Control Neighborhoods • (1970 Census Tract Data) • Guide to data columns: Column 1: City identification 2: Neighborhood identification 3; Percent population Black (1 decimal) t 4: Percent households which are female headed 0co 5: Percent population Spanish Speaking 6: Median school years completed (1 decimal) 7: Percent in same house 1965 as 1970 8: Median family income 9: Percent dwelling units which are owner-occupied 10: Percent dwelling units which are renter-occupied 11: Median dwelling unit value 12: Median dwelling unit rent 13: Percent dwelling units built before 1939 14: Neighborhood for group home (=1) or control home (=0) l / • _ . I• • - 1 • • • 1 - ' 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 . 11 12 13 14 Valley Strewn 0 1 0 09 11 121 706 12708 759 229 '27200 171 -1117 • 1 0 :' 2 0 • ' 89 • II '121 706 12180 759 229 27200 111' 3117 • I •0 3 1 • 73 23 121 732 141116 861 111 29100 141 15'i . P . Hempstead. 1 I . 50 99 15 124 . . 547' 12920 520 455 24000 171 340 0 I a 50 99 15 124 S47 12924 520 • 45S 241100 171 340 : 1 2 I 1 85 21 10S 773. 11621 475 . 496 21700 _ 107....-_-. 760..t1_-• ._,I . : a 2 30 . 151 ' 1 127 529 14500 201 769 46100 '191 _ 920 . 1 • 2 3 873 274 .92 100 600 7851 178 801 22000 90 714 , 1 I 2 4 1' 160 21 95 h70 9(.25 215 •• 769 22909 R0 176 1 2 S 46 - 172 64 97 604 99110 : 217 • 735 15800 75. 027 i 1 I a 6 " 1 `' 160 20 12 692 9974 1R2 • 804 25100 • 85 .. • 056 I 3 7, 913. ' 311 89 • 01 .. 595 ' 6170 154•.:. 793_..13100 _.B1r3�._1103 = --'.1 _ 2 8 656 312 1211 • 11 556 6920 87 869 19600 81 771 I 9 2 9, 396 . 1114 • 51 24 S45 9113 64 - 904 27000, 105 653 1 Brooklyn 2 10 955 421 73 00 591 51110 97 861 15000 77 901 I ' -2 11 76 •I, 199 122 10 . 611 9012 141 000 -211100 10) - 826 - 1 ' 3 - 12 , 14 '• 176 72 20 • 520 11211 112 017 211600 122 . , 563 ' I . ••• 2. . 13 -•-_. 7 __ 134 -- 11 - 19.. .707 '. 12603 586__398 ` 24100 .._'_129.' :.709 �a1 0- 2 . 14 913 ' 360 82 ' 01 (.09 6455 155 777 17200 78 '825 0 2 15 190 101 195 17 553 9335 183 ' 161 41200 05 910 0 • 2 3 1 77 11 23 766 14241 474 311 17000 146 ' 405 1 Yonkers • 3 4 7 79 27 27 759 16557 710 . - 271 ,- 42600 ::.-' 118 = • " .569 ' •- 0 3 5 • 92._i 189 21 07 ` 659 9166 197 169 , 17800 -' - 06,•;': 660 •-1-1 3 - 6 -251 _;� 1R0 _ 69 - 09 :_-_.664 -__- 9845__ _ - 90�_063.11.17500 ,•,'='a. B0'-1 1:.04 9 '--'f=•1�_ 3 7 392 . 201 49 21 502 9911 ' 75 891 11000 126 542 0 ' 4 1 38 R6 69 _ 2S 495 15795 343 613 30400 •161 268 1 4 2 355 164 639 81 S6q 4556 S0 90S 14 76 742 I Bronx 1 4 3 104 _ 225 318 11 562 1641 14 ' 944 •• 20600 �1_,' 84 : 712 :•.. O. ' 1 • ' 4 ' 311 -• 240 346 - OR 396 7600 16 973 , 22000 - ' 07 ='j 804 1 --0. S 396 ..� .2119 ..r._.274__ : 07_... __517__._1079.'__. 41 -94]_`-_ M -> 93=_771-='="•_`1- T. . 4 6 60S . 103 83 • 09 6R2 9655 . 179 611 216110 97 617 1 •4 7 14 95 180 05 555 10425 460 • 5)) 24900 124 S29 1 1 8 l4 . 95 100 05 555 10425 460 513 24900 124 _ - 529 • 0 • S 1 • . 37 170 1 ' 25 519 6814 290 • 679 - 19200 - 97 = 810=:_-+ 1 Albany 5 2 10 _123 " 0 21 577 9661 496 524 ' 26400 . 126 '; 658 Jr? • 1 • ' . _ S 3 . . 1 .... 149 .,.. _- 3 . . 21 .. . 599 _._.10602_-__ S4B .._-432-i17600-=_ 9I_1,__R50___=0_ • S 4 20 73 1 ' 24 61.4 12263 083 101 199C0 129 171 0 S S 20 73 1 24 . 664 12261 881 103 19900 129 171 0 6 • 1 17 139 5 21 502. 9040 525 456 . 16500 75 504 1 6 : 2 1 0 ; 114 : .. 4 20 615' 9745 431 514 14000 `• 74 . 970 "-• • - 1 Troy 6 :• 3 1. 19 152 '.: 0 10 600 10154 421. 548 10000 - 61 940 = - 1 } =--6-=1-- 6 -__ 19_J _152 _—_- 01.. . 10 __ 608.....101S4 ._ __ 421 . _. 540 -_ 10900 -.___63.—_• 940 —___0 I 6 4 9 72 12 19 306 9821 4S7 498 . 16900 61 1197 1 i 6 7 ' 9 12 -12 19 3116 91121 451 490 16400 67 09.7 - 0 6 5 166 275 6 02 417 7340 91 702 7100 58 111.14 I - - Syracuse 0 11 •• - 104 0 20 687 9500 760 . 224 16100 103 772 1' ' 0 2 3 175 0 12 617 0329 462 544 11300 06 005 1 0 3 6 131 0 . 21 - 643. 9932 616 - - 362 • 15R00 - -104,----- 810 ----- 1 ' 8 4 1 I•-4 0 04 505 9477 474 520 12000 al 077 0 0 5 3 94 17 22 716 11052 710 251 1'1100 111 610 0 - Buffalo 9 1 3 122 0 21 . 72) . Mil S10 454 ' 14100 a7 . H00 1 - • 9 2 1 -115 18 20 617 13345 476 500 21500 09 950':ifit. ••1 9 3 111 136 0 29 509 13313 256 , 692 211500 124 . 71-3 'r 1' - - - 9 4 149 - 224 . a 14 574 0016 396 _. _.572 - 10900 _ .: 71. ...... 751 -_:..1 - 9 5 27 . 119 11 21 627 13112 Slla 392 20600 110 718 0 I 9 6 0 119 20 13 618 9577 527 449 11100 74 835 - 1 I 9 7 0 . 136 0 96 690 9130 527 435 10700. 95 409 0 -- -- - -- --------- - __•_:.,---- - - Procedures The first stage of data collection involved fieldwork in each of. the neighborhoods where a group- home was located. . ,.The facility and all buildings within' one block.radius (two-block area) were, identified and plotted on a map. The type.. of housing unit in which the facility -was located, the type of neighboring land use - (single-.family, apartment, commercial, etc.), and the physical condition of the properties in the impact area were noted . in the mapping:- Any unique features of the group home were acted, and its relatiye conspicuousness- was evaluated on a• scale from one -to five. The' facility' s physical condition.relative to the .surrounding structures was evaluated 'on a • similar scale. Photographs were taken of the facility and •the surrounding area. • • Demographic information on 'the impact areas and the sample communities ' was gathered by using data from census tracts in the 1970 Census of Population • and Housing. 'Such data as median family income, the percentage of Blacks in the tract, and median school years completed were recorded. The second stage of research involved the identification of control areas t' based upon census date, land 'use, and maps which indicated areas of facility • saturation. Information relating to each census tract in which a facility was located.:was -extracted from- the United States Census of Po',ulation and iiousina. (1970). Controls were chosen which closely mirrored the socioeconomic, gee- _ graphic and physical characteristics of the neighborhoods containing the group residence. Finally, all controls were chosen in such a fashion as to avoid areas, of saturation by community residences or other social service facilities. (Once a control area had- been identified, one house was designated -10- _ii_ as a "pseudo-facility" for the purposes of mapping surrounding buildings which fell within a one-block radius.) As community residence. and control neighborhoods 'were identified,.map'ped, ;and evaluated, data was collected concerning property assessments and transac- • ,tions. Each property within a one block radius of the facility or control was traced to find all sales in the area from January of the year preceding; the facility's opening (i.e. if a facility opened' on 3/75, data would be ollected from 1/74). For properties sold during this time period, sales. 'Ibefore the opening were traced back to 1967 for comparability. Nominal lsales or sales within a family were discounted.- Certain group homes were not' included in the final analysis. Such homes were omitted because they. were located next to apartment complexes or other rental dwellings, making it impossible to .accurately gauge the effect of ij • the facility on property transactions, prices, and turnover rates within the impact area. Finally, information was gathered, where available, about opposition . and controversy surrounding the opening of facilities, from newspaper accounts and from discussions with those responsible for the siting of group homes. • Data Sources The study attempted to gauge the magnitude of neighborhood reaction to the siting of an MR group home, assuming that such reaction would evidence itself in the real property market. Records of real property transactions were located for each of the ten study cities. In some instances the records were found in city or county offices, while in others privately published Real Estate Directories were utilized. Comparable data were available • from both sets of sources--location of transaction, date, sales price, and. the names of seller and buyer (the last two to eliminate intra-family sales) , and assurances were received that both were complete records of property activity. The sources for each of the cities is as follows: - Upstate Downstate Albany Real Estate Directory Bronx City Register Troy County Clerk Brooklyn Real Estate Directory Buffalo County Clerk Yonkers Real Estate Directory • Syracuse Real Estate Directory $empstead Block and Lot gegister) Kingston City Register Valley Stream Block and Lot(Register) Assessed valuation for each of the properties in the study- and control areas were also obtained from local assessors' offices. The use of such data has been limited, due to the highly political nature of assessments. In all- instances when outside contact was necessary to obtain data, the confidentiality of the study was maintained. • -12 Statistical Analysis • a carried out by means °f . Pro ert`y value gtudv value impacts was for the neighboring •. P d of property d e analysis equation was estimate was es timat e A te$ression q a separate equation . _ regression model. ach group home: " e first regression model e surrounding a the u Properties a dependent variable in vicinity of the group t'Orn area. the for the control properties in trans- market p of 4 the between successive rice was the change in months property number of price of the b the situ divided y purchase 4 occurred for control a (or decrease) in P ropertq. i.e. the increase ed only if sales of 4 e control actions, are included For th actions of the group home. per month.. Trans t blishrnen the match of transactions. before establishment both after and preserve as measured by used to 4 ce date was model was the distance a comparable d fro area, in this firstmeasure home or its contro 1 � the dependent variable roup, the • away from the g proximity the number of houses estimates the ..effect of P 1, as measured thus roperties, The : : ae 1to30) • negroup ho e °f value of compared: e on equations are then distance var group home regression q for the dista The rear coefficient rice. The coef f i month in property p. by sales P act. area imp per impact versus control a (or decrease) 4 Th • al increase control site. tionhome or cater the additional the group l indicates from distan tan away if the ce model of distance ed in this dif for each unit be confirm of no impact wouldtrot were not significantly home d hypothesis home and con u roue for the group coefficient for both g ce coefficient coeffi if the distance from one another; or de art significantly from zero. P -15• • • Findings. The correlation and regression analyses do not support the assertion- of group home impact on neighborhood property values. Degree of proximity to either group homes or control' hones has no significant effect on property value changes. Properties next door, across the street, or a few doors • away from a group home have basically the same increase (or decrease) per - month in value (as measured by sales prices) as properties farther away. The same is .true, of course; for properties close to, or far away from, the control sites. The plots are quite explicit (Figure 1 for group homes; Figure 2 for the control sites) . The simple correlations indicate non- significant relationships (r=.09 .and r=.08) , positive in value, but at low enough levels as to not differ significantly from zero. The .,regression " • coefficients yield the same findings--the slopes are slightly positive, ' but not significantly different from one another or from zero. The analyses • were carried out with the subgroups of.properties experiencing before and after transactions (with- respect to establishment of the group home) ; with the expectation that this sample is unbiased with respect to -proximity effects. • Property .turnover rates reveal- a. similar pattern with respect to the .' • distance factor (Table 2 ) ,. For the twelve month period following estab- lishment of a group home, no greater proportion of adjoining properties were sold than those -.farther away. . Transaction rates around group homes were equivalent to those around the "aukmy" control 'property. The,more detailed analysis (see data lists in the.Appendix) revealed that even in those cases of high turnover of nearby properties, sales prices were con- sistent with the prevailing neighborhood trend of market values. FIGURE 11 Scattergraph of Market Value Change (per month) and Distance of Property to Group Home Site • Lue . — -- - - - - 2. su 4.90 7.50 10.10 12.70 15.30 1700 • 2C.'i) 21.10 2c.70 •b----•--r--•----•----•----••----•••---•----•---••.----•----•----•----•..---•- -+• -.-•----•----•----•----•• 3 •* I I . • 63.03 I I I 1 h) I I • I I I I 1 I I • I • I I . I I • I -- I I I 1 I I I I • I I I I 1 .00 • • I • I • 52.00 • I I . •I - I I I I I - I • . I 1.48 • I I • 43.48 I I I I I _ . . ..- . __ I _ • I I T . I - - - 1 : I • I ': _ 1 . 14.97 • I I _ • 34.97 I I I 1 . I I I * 1 N _ .. I :; - I a, I I = I • - I 1 I I I I I •I I I' I • • I 17.94 • I _. ; I . � 12.94 I I Y + I ' ...I 1 I • I . I I I I I I ,. 9.42 - • _•_._ ... . ,., I . .._ . _ I . .. ,;. _ -- + _ . 9.42 I • -• " I . I • . . s' « . I . I • + •• I •• • I . I _ 1 4, - I • • •1 a I I • • • • 3 3 12 2 3 2 + •I * * r rI 0.91 • • • • 4 2 12 • • * I + it • 3.91 . I • .2 • •.. • + 13 * • •. . . • •_ • I .* ... I . . .. I. + - • I • I • • - I I 2 I* I . _ • I - ' - • I . I I I • • I 1 -- . . • -7.61 ■ I 1 . • 1 I I • I • STATISTICAL PACKAGE FOR THE SOCIAL SCIENCES , . • 4 i STATISTICS.. . CORRELATION (R)- 0.09155 P SQUARED - O.COR39 IIG4IPICANC3 - 0.19270 STD ERR OP EST - 11.17724 INTERCEPT (A) - . • 1.0473.9 SLOPE (D) - 0. 16131 PLOTTED VALUES - - 92 EXCLUDED VAL►IFS- 0 AISSINI: VAIMEg - 1 • • • N . . 1 • • • • • • L1 • . U . FIGURE 2E Scattergraph of Market Value Change (per month) and distance of Propertyto Control Home Site • Market Value 2.*---2.40 5.20 11.00 10.00 13.6C 16.40 19.20 22.1' 24.94 27.60 ' Cllaugf4.67 ♦ •----1----♦----e----♦----�----�----s-;--°----�----♦----+----5----�----♦----1----�----�- --b I I ` I A 24.67 . . (per month) I I I t I I I I I I I I 21.29 ♦ I I 4 21.Y9 I I I I I I • I I I I I I I I I 17.91 ° 2 . I I I I y 17.91 I I I I _ ..- I • I 1 I I 14.5] 1 I . ... . . . I I ♦ 14.53 I I I I • I . I I I I I I I . . ._ = • . .. 11.15 . . � .. . I I • ♦ I I. to I I I I ,� 7.77 2 I I : , I •. I Sr I �' 7.77 I r • I I I * I • • I I 1 . 4.40 • I s • I • . * I * �4.40 I • * 3 I I r: I r I 3 • I 2 2-- --2 2 I . .. I •• 2 S I • 2 ; 2---2 I 1.02 •• • 2 4 •• 3 I • + I ° 21• I2 ♦ I 21 • I op I 1.02 I 2 2 • I • . I • I I I —2.]6 ' ♦ • 2 I 3 2 I • I I •I . I I —2. 36 �. I I I I 2 I I . I —5.74 - ♦ I I I • I I I ♦ —5.74 r I • - I I n I ' I . I ♦ • I I I .-, —9. 12 • 2 , I I I • STATISTICAL PACKAGE moo Ting SOCIAL SCIENCES , , ' I. 9 • STATISTICS.. ---- I. CORRELATION (0)- 0.08499 • R SQUARED - 0.00722 SIeNIPICA(:CP - .... . 3.21422 STD ERR OF EST - 4.60671 INTERCEPT (A) - 1.17507 SLOPE (R) - 0.06038 • PLOTTED fILULS - 89 EXCLUDED YALIIES- 0 MISSING VALUES - 0 • • • • • • • • �.: • e ' • TABLE 2 : Property Turnover Rates Within 12 Months Following the Establishment of Group Homes and Controls, by Distance Zones Distance from the Home 1-5 6-10 11-15 16-20 21 or more TOTAL Group Home Neighborhoods 39 • 47 38 13 16 153 4 c 4 Control Home Neighborhoods 45 58 39 19 17 178 TOTAL 84 • 105 77 32 33 331 • • • • TABLE 3 PROPERTY TURNOVER GROUP HOME AREA CONTROL AREA // OF //OF CITY AREA //OF PROPERTY INDEX MEDIAN MEAN //OF PROPERTY INDEX MEDIAN MEAN CODE SALES SOLD PRICE PRICE SALES SOLD PRICE PRICE VALLEY 001 0 0 0 4 4.5 89.9 38,000 40,000 STREAM 002 8 8.5 17.4 53,500 48,600 15 16.9 34.4 41,000 42,900 HEMPSTEAD 102 29 45.3 46.2 34,500 34,500 43 44.3 45.2 34,000 33,200 - 201 12 12.1 28.2 33,600 32,350 18 20.0 46.5 37,750 37,600 202 34 35.8 52.6 79,000. 84,500 31 31.3 46.0 37,500 37,600 203 5 5.2 52.1 33,750 31,375 8 8.1 80.8 37,500 42,900 R 204 21 29.2 30.4 38,000 39,100 35 33.9 40.5 31,500 30,800 U 205 5 5.1 33.9 37,000 38,700 10 10.1 77.7 37,500 39,000 206 7 7.2 103.1 52,000 55,300 5 5.1 72.2 55,000 , 35,900 i L 207 • 7 7.1 54.4 17,250 20,400 6 6.1 46.6 7,000 .10,900 N.) N 208 4 4.4 55.6 11,250- 10,000 5 5.1 63.1 8,250 11,875 ~' 209 6 6.1 40.4 36,500 33,500 10 10.1 67.3 37,500 39,600 210 - 4 4.2 32.4 14,500 14,625 6 6.1 46.6 7,000 10,900 211 27 27.6 76.5 43,000 44,500 16 17.8 49.4 37,750 38,800 212 4 4.3 53.8 34,000 37,125 2 2.2. 27.8. 39,000 39,000 303 12 12.2 39.5 59,750 56,200 10 12.0 38.9 64,500 61,700 YONKERS 305 5 6.5, 34.2 62,000 60,400 10 12.0 63.4 . 64,500 61,700 306 7 11.1 48.3 20,000 27,100 8 10.5 45.8 12,000 17,400 B 402 - 1 1.6 6.1 6,500 6,500 7 14.0 53.8 27,200 36,600 U 404 1 1.3 43.9 5,000 , 5,000 1 2.0 66.7 ' 43,000 43,000 405 4 10.3 42.7 80,950 90,225 7 14.0 58.3 27,200 36,000 X 406 4 4.1 51.0 41,550 42,525 7 7.1 88.4 38,000 34,900 ti 407 23 23.2 38.1 35,000 34,800 30 30.3 . 49.7 36,000 35,900 , • �.1 1 ' TABLE 3(CONTINUED)RNOVER • • GROUP HOME AREA CONTROL AREA p of iOPEPRICE PRICE • CITY AREA 0 OF PROPERTY INDEX. - MEDIAN N MEANC SALES SOLD INDEX MEDIAN MEAN CODE SALES SOLD 12.1 18.0 21,750 21,400 10.818,000 19,873 11 15.9 S.S 22.9 21,500 20,800 501502 3 8.4 41,200 35,200 S _ 37.1 3 5.7 14.9 33,500 33,300 ALBANY SOS 3 8.6 22.6 31,500 30,300, 7.7 18.8 15,000 17,700 • 601 6 -- 9.2 22.4 34,500 38,750 3 2. 11.1 15,000 1 , 00 602 8 11•.6 - 48.3 20,000 18,600 1 0 0 29.8 29,500 29,500 0 19.2 26,500 26,500 TROY 603 1 3.0 25.0 83.3 27,000 27,800 2- 8 3 16.0 26,500 24,700 t .604 5 17.9 34.4 25,000 29,900 3 605 0 0 - - CV 36,300 33,400 0 N 701 3 4.3 }: 20.7 - - 4 12.9 61.4 26,000 23,600 0 0 0 12.9 61.4 26,000 23,600 t KINGSTON 702 3 9.3 44.6 20,500 19,100 4 703 - • 7.4 3v,9 15,000 15,000 26,000 25,500 6 15,000 15,100 80802 6 6.7 27.8. 25,000 22,700 25.9 36.0 15,000 17,100 35.7 2120.8 9 24.6 19,000 18,400 2 2.5 SYRACUSE 803 4 4.6 38.3 9 9.7 30.2 15,000 17,000 901 • 5 • 5.2 15.9 27,000 37,300 27.1 30.5 21,500 21,500 35.7 20,000 21,400 16 39.7 8,S 28.2 28,000 26,500 902 IS 11.5 22,000 27,300 5 12.9 903 11 . 38.2 22.6 12,950 13,300 BUFFALO31.3 54.9 -7,000 -9,000 12 2.29 11.96 12,950 13,300 9046 313 6.7 37.0 33,000 .. 37,000 906 3 • The Index=the 96 of properties sold a theum number 38s the23 for group home hases, been for contro s, It Is thus useful for comparing • turnover from area to area. The median index . . •-,..-. ... . • . • ,.: . • . • •• • - ,. EXH] E' •12. ( 26. Pages ) • .• . . • _. . . . • .. • • ,? - . • .. . .. .. . .. . . • • •• • . .. . , • - . . - - • , -. . . • • , . .. .. . . • • - • - • . -•- • - • - • • • . ..: ...:). Ile •' . , •COMMUNITY ACCEPTANCIE . _,. • • . •. . . ..,. .• . • •. ••.•• . •. •• .• .‘. . .... •• • . • : : • . • ... .. • .•. .. .... • , „ . . . . . . , . . . ... . .. . . . „.. . . ... • _ . . ... ..•••• . • . . . ... .• .. . . . . .- • . . . . . • . .... .., •• . . .. .........,.. • .. . .....• . . •••...• .. . .. . . . • . . • •.. . . . . : . .. . , . . . . , . • . • • • • - .. . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . • . . .. •. • . _.• . . . .. . . • .„ , • . • . . • .. . ,•, . .... . . . • -.. A REPORT BASED ON THE RESULTS .. •• ... • . . . • . . , - . .. •• - - . . .. • •-. . . OF A COUNTY-WIDE NEIGHBORHOOD • , . . . • • • .•••:. • :::: • . • A .•• .. .• . • ... .. . .. OPINION SURVEY AND A PROPERTY ••: - .. • •FIEALIsTicTHE SALES. STUDY REGARDING ,.. ... . • . . . , . EFFECTS OF FAMILY/GROUP HOMES . . . . •.•..• . • . . :--: APPRCIACH . FOR PERSONS WITH MENTAL - . • .. .H. •••.. ., . RETARDATION-DEVELOPMENTAL . ,., . . .,...•..• ., •.- ,. • .... . ... . „. •„ ....• •.• .. - . •. • .. • : • . . ... • • . . .....•• al., - . • -.... ... • DISABILITIES IN THE . . . . . • .... i.". , . . . . • • • • 4 • • • . ..--. ... ' .1111111161.. . .':' 11116• . .• : COMMUNITY- . * • • •••• - - •• -••. . .- • • - - .. - . ,_. ......-••;,.:;;• 7110% . . . . . , •:„,•-•- • '.::".'"'T y •....„. — . . : MONTGOMERY COUNTY, OHIO. . .•.........,-.......i:,:::• :-... - .. . • ••-• . ..-,:.,...,„:„. '..„,7,%.•• • . .• . • • • •. . . • , , . . • . . \:2';`• ....•.-.-! .•._.•;:t.-. ./ . . .. . . . • . .. ,. ., . '. •7:• ...1T.•',/ +•.••. ,.. . .• • • - .• • . ' . 4. t. ' '.." .-4,•':•,/ je.:'" • '''''. - • • .• . • •• • . 4,• • -.. ' •';'. * .I,,I,...,• • •-• ' •' .. • • . . i••. . ., , • , • . / • ,0•.e:•- allidI . • • 4. •• ...'..... •. . •1 • . - . • • • .... '". • . . . • • • • • . .• • . . • • • . _..-.. ... . . -... • ..;• . „ . . .,!..!-•.-........ • .,:.'::: :,',.,•‘k•••X:'•-• ' • • • • . ;.:.. ..$1. ±ro ;..;••••."-jt':--.. ..".".;;.• I.:'r;•.42.. • • '''1.• '''' 7-e...-ii.,•i.•'-',..: ••.I ',.;,•,;"•:,::: • • i-4.'iii;•,•:: •-•-•••:,--_,..-•.: ::1;•ci';•::•;!?.•":-.-I • -• • f7...,s-oic;. t'ri'-." •i.;,-;::••,-..:.• :,ri,.. — . - 44...,.•/...---• e;:Y :-.!,j.,7..e.;••••t!. .--.,•:,;•;72 .', •`--.'.' • 1 • • ,1•-•:•,•n:-7--„z=•;,,u -77:;-4:-.7',..:.. '. • „.•'•:::: '..,,,b;1., it,,,,,,s . •:'i. ...:.•,..".., ,..--_- _:s,„ . -;,,,, . 1., i.. . ,.:-•ft:::;.,%:....-,,,, .......,•::,,, -.7ry,:.:, ,,,.• -.--;...;,:. 4-:-.,,,..,-,,,,.:;,.....,.-i.._......___ .,......, „,-,:,..„....„-,,,,,:„.." • . .. ! . .7,1-.,:-.;,-:::_,:•-,..... --.,..-.• • -,•-n-,-:,....:,:-".,..,-.• -,•:...:,..::...,..... ., .-4.• .„ . ,.....---- - • .• f .. .. .. . : • ,_... ':‘• .1. Xlillir. . . • •-•••:.-.;•%;i••••:.•-,4 ...1 • : 7-.•<.'•.. , -••‘,....,••,"--. •:`•'7:. • . - i . .1. i .. . . ., -..t• i --;•.'',:: ';.,;, I---..-• -,.......,-.• -'2_4. . i • ,-4.:.-:....-:- ---1 • , -.,• --:::-.::•:-..-''-',": 1 ::-..-.::.. • • • ,. . ..,1,..,. ,,- . • ''•..•..',I.'..:::..p t••.7.V ....I‘.,!•......•••...ii.:.!?i'....(' ' . . • . ,.. _.....;;*7%'L....7 1...1.1:<I '.• . 7 • ...... . ..i..:'?...;: J.'::'..•‘•'..I.::.4•.1 .. . • .,•"•.. • • •••:-%•74...;.;•'••Z9,.•',..:'.;.;•:•••:17,. '•:,r?.•:•,•••, •• ! ;..:.•••••••• '..-•' ., •• ••••?..;....;•..•;' .:,•74........:-.:..r• .. 4;•:.-....• ;Z:'''.7.!.''..'-.•.f.:.r:S•...•:•••::!.....:: :-...• ..S'•'• • ..... , a...02.•.....,:%.: ..,..„::, . . . • .. -..--.''.,::::-ic.i.,:1";:t.-.;.i.::.--,-,......:--:•• -‘:-. 41,,,,:.;;::.--„,-',::-..:.:-.-..,,,_ • -„, .,..... .-•s, _. ,. ., .?. •,.,,,- :.., ',--:1'4.:1.. . .. OF FC2-""'°' 1--", r.-:::-\ • - . - -,----'.-;..t.-..:-7.-:;:z:',',‘.;:;.!:n---z--.:....-..-, 1'..,-....•,-. • :•:----..:•i....„.. . .. . or( i,. . :-.::,•-•;:-.,.....=::-.i‘,•;•?!:-;•-•,.. •: -...;•:•.- . ;:'.. ..1.•;":-....:....;...:;•,..i.•. 1_ r . t.',:r.:?...,...?..:...4-,•:',-,..;,:,,::::...--: •.--...-.::..:.•,• ::.;-...,-----, -.::---:,:.......r.` • :. -.. -:;_.•.:. .. .:'t•:.:--' -.1.:•:.:::,. 0 \-r. ' \n . . .;.,t,;>.• .::--.r:.1\'-1......;•-•,--:-.-" • ....:.i-r..,,'•,,::• ::*:-:•.-. !,•••• : 88• . ..__\‘, • v.EB 2,4 Ag - • . -,...::,!:.:.;•--"...,7-:1-'7;'"-J:,• %,;i:',' . ••.•,.;::.';-::4".:7-',..•' . .. •-, .... +.-,. •..• ,....,...-• ^-' ..1 •. ..,;. ".•-•':::':',,!ri:.•....S..i....,..I'f.-;... • .DErT,..,\,...:-. • . -. - -..::.........;,,,..-.-r....,.:,-.,......,..-:....-„,:-.:, • • . .,--, . • • . • _ . • Montgomery Co. Bd. of Mental Retardation & Developmental Disabilities . • 1 � 7 ' 1 • PROJECT STAFF: A REPORT BASED ON THE RESULTS TERENCE T. MAMBORT OF A COUNTY-WIDE NEIGHBORHOOD ELVIA B. THOMAS REBECCA G. FEW • OPINION SURVEY AND A PROPERTY in conjunction with SALES STUDY REGARDING THE PHILIP MAGIN, APPRAISER EFFECTS OF FAMILY/GROUP HOMES FOR PERSONS WITH MENTAL DR. HERMAN TORGE, • RESEARCH CONSULTANT RETARDATION-DEVELOPMENTAL OFFICE OF EDUCATIONAL SERVICES DISABILITIES IN THE UNIVERSITY OF DAYTON, OHIO COMMUNITY— MONTGOMERY COUNTY, OHIO. • • This project was made possible by a grant from the Ohio Developmental Disabilities Council entitled "Community Acceptance — Alternative Living Arrangements" — Project No. 8021 (A), which was awarded to the Residential Services Division of the Montgomery County Board of Mental Retardation & Developmental Disabilities. • Cover Rebecca G. Few Illustrations: Courtesy of Martha Perske ©1981, MARCH Montgomery Co. Bd. of Mental Retardation & Developmental Disabilities Acknowledgements -• ' Community Acceptance Project has been positive, progressive and productive in the .establishment of community programs to service individuals with developmental disabilities. Through the efforts of the project staff, many hours of research, discussion and presentations have been conducted with all levels of the community.These efforts could never have been attained without the express support from the MONTGOMERY •- COUNTY BOARD OF MENTAL RETARDATION&DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES, which has proven to be a leader in many areas of services to the community. Without their commitment;a project of such magnitude ; could never have been fulfilled.An individual who has labored many hours and years with all levels of the community; who helped cultivate the ,, establishment of numerous programs throughout the State, and who continues to work toward the betterment of individuals with developmental disabilities deserves credit for his contribution, support and efforts in the community—Superintendent Harvey J. Stein. A heart-felt thanks should also be given to all those direct-care and supportive staff and,of course,the residents in those community programs for working on community acceptance issues on a twenty-four hour,day-to- day basis in their communities.Theirr continuous efforts have proven to be successful, as will be indicated by this report, and their efforts should be - applauded for "making their community a better community." TABLE OF CONTENTS - Page INTRODUCTION i PROJECT HISTORY SECTION I. PROPERTY SALES STUDY Introduction 1 Findings - p 2 Group Home Analysis Sheehan Road 4 Springmill Road - 6 East Third Street 8 Heatherton Drive 10 Greenhill Road 12 Woodbury Road 14 Kenbrook Drive 16 SECTION II. NEIGHBORHOOD OPINION SURVEY Introduction 17 Findings • i • Demographic Tables 1 and 2 • 18 Table 3 19 Data Base • Table 4 - 21 • Table 5, 6, & 7 23 General Comments 24 SECTION III. PROJECT SUMMARY Property Sales Study 25 Neighborhood Opinion Survey 26 • APPENDIX A. Fact Sheet (New Neighbors) 28 B. Credential Listing - Philip Magin, Property Appraiser 29 C. Credential Listing - Dr. Herman.Torge, Research Consultant 30 D. Bibliography 31 LIST OF TABLES Table 1: Survey Distribution and Return: By Neighborhood With Group Homes 18 Table 2: Survey Distribution and Return: By Nongroup Home Neighborhood 18 Table 3: Characteristics of Respondents: By Percent of Response 19 Table 4: Responses to Survey Questions 8-26 21 Table 5: Responses to Survey Question 27 23 Table 6: Responses to Survey Question 28 23 Table 7:. Responses to Survey Question 29 23 q Introduction The success of programs designed to assist people with developmental disabilities return to or remain in their communities in the least restrictive setting is highly dependent upon community reaction to the location of residential facilities.In order for residential programs to be first developed and then integrated into the mainstream of community life, it is paramount that the community accepts the goals of residential programs, and particularly, the people served in such programs.. The response to the establishment of residences for the disabled in Montgomery County, as in many other communities around the country,has been intense and varied,often frustrating the establishment of homes.Neighborhood residents appear to be primarily concerned about the value of their homes.Their degree of uncertainty toward the individuals with handicaps to be served has also raised numerous questions. The concerns of community people are understandable. It is, therefore, incumbent upon the professionals delegated the responsibility of developing community programs to work effectively with the general community. The challenge then, must be to explore, examine and investigate the issues and provide the general community with hard facts that will assist citizens in forming opinions about disabled individuals and residential programs that are based on facts. - , Project History In Montgomery County, the Board of Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities is the primary program serving the needs of individuals with developmental disabilities.In 1977,the Board of Mental Retardation staff was directed to prepare a.general position paper on residential services in order that the Board be able to make practical, long-range decisions regarding residential services. A strong recommendation of the position paper was to implement a Residential Service•Plan that would provide realistic and viable strategies for the development of a continuum of residential services. The nature and purpose of the.Planning Project was to develop a unified plan for residential services throughout Montgomery County(approximate population is 570,000).With the drawing to a close of the Planning Project,a number of recommendations were developed.One of the services recommended in the Planning Project reads as follows: • A Community Acceptance Program "The establishment of a variety of living alternatives has been proposed in order to provide normal and satisfying lives for hundreds of persons with developmental disabilities. Unfortunately, wide-spread misunderstanding and community opposition have been serious obstacles to service development. Much of the success of this plan(Residential Services) will be related to our ability to gain community acceptance that•will, in turn, facilitate the opening of urgently.needed new programs. It will require that we work with_the community to become supportive and knowledgeable of persons with differences. The implementation of strategies to overcome acceptance barriers will be crucial to future residential developments." • Montgomery County Residential Services Plan, 1979 - 1980 (Draft) The fact that the Board of Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities is intensely committed to providing services to individuals with developmental disabilities in the area of residential programs and that the Residential Plan specifically suggests that community acceptance programs be developed within the county, provided a strong rationale for initiating this Community Acceptance Project. This positive and progressive commitment by the Board, to undertake a key role in facilitating community-wide residential planning, led to the development of this project. A grant was applied for through the Ohio Developmental Disabilities Council, "Alternative Living Arrangements for the Developmentally Disabled-Community Acceptance,"in March of 1980.The objectives to be addressed by the grant are the-following: 0 1) That the impact of group homes and other residential programs for the developmentally disabled in Ohio, in surrounding rural and urban communities, be identified; 2) That existing programs promoting community acceptance be identified; 3) That a plan be developed that provides strategies for obtaining community support and acceptance of community-based residential programs; • • 4) That dissemination include relative groups,such as residential development organizations in Ohio. This document contains reports on what has traditionally been perceived as obstacles to the establishment of community-based residential programs. They are: 1) The question of property values; and 2) The uncertainty of community people towards individuals with handicaps. • • • • • I r ..• • . . • • ,. . . . . . •. ..• , • . - • "--.4,4,4ttn:ii•.; ...• •-,,...•• .....;:•;•.4:•.•:•:,/.,.., .1)- -i.,,a...!.-•ta - . . .....,.• , 7-3;4•,.ii•e".'. •• • :•'.'...r..fi.:•:...r...........‘ .0;‘,A...;•t Aa../.:.,:••''• • •-q*:.'‘.- '': .. : ••• ' •-•,4-'•. -'•-•:::•••••cei'VATP"( ;14' •• i'Pi.! :-'''...-.. , • •-'. :-.•.• •....•....:.--.L. •':.<;;:k....,..• _,...-••,,...5,?;.: ..t, tiri • . ' M , 0.• .V.,p i;•., 444aitr:,-..-.•...T.- - • 4.10405 ,:,.•••' -0-,;'eri::A..... •. r ,-,i••--r-.• .,,.4".Z.ito. • '""tel:)--i‘., -.... li!,1.;•..11, .1P!)C4e,`•/-01-.. (41 . "E'/X....'• ‘ •!Ilk: • •,-(..*,f.,....7.: ..........!1•LI.,% ... ,,4%,..7,1•11,1 . ,, i-fti 10;,: .L 41.ti:41cf. '''..2,•%;-,:... :.;1114t. "•,'-f.. 3.>•:: .1,1-4.1f,..r. •••• .....i' )100, 4, ,,(4..-.v41,1r."riri;;V::, 447 ,rt.,. .,-•.4-,,.i,..,,A,,f.:,. ... .- .,oref, :..0A?)..,14,...-,•..,..:::,..e.:,,:,.....,„,..,....„,,,„:,.. ,,,,,,,,,, i,,, ,it!,mil(Pi .; •4•7.'!„ 7rAV.i„,,'17.quf.•::40,Vr.::i;i: .L.:i•.•;.7i-,440.1:Pitiifflr'' - f :i t ri;Or.. 4';'.,Fst ,./i-e;la-J-,..•` - - ...._-*".(•::-.; ...-/....•:;:.:,;!-•.!;;;.,i4,,, „,..,-,:i... ...;r.• i ;,..11;;;---i.' .4;,',, ,':7,-- ",,440,Pall".,..,_..z!, .f•-..•;i4:•:....• ..••.' ...ji! " 0%.,.?r-t•t!r-Jiii l';.f,trTi7,(•ii_,rt,941Y`l-'!;,'? -,...1.4 ,r.T.p..AIII. , r••‘1q.sY ,11.'4"4' • • -,;•:•...P..;.•etTiO'...,fl7". irg,k•'" r,{. f'..4 ....ii '. . , :: Efar-Axtre-glit, i'ii•;1fr.'v* '•.**;',.:i'*:".'V;i';(/:!,/,'''.•:41,/{414, 41,1i7M;f,k ''.* i fir —.- '6 44i.itviigge.:?1•1'.2-,: i• I- ;4,,eic. ..:•;*.-3:,... • ,z :..,..,i'•-411.1.L.Y.C.It'e,345;•12-.4i4vi_A.,:(0.--•;44.r•14-*';•44;11* -....q. , -•:-:•E-'-'4'-.:-.-,17.;-:•••1'•-•;•=7:. ,-;-,. ----,:e•44.,'`.,••1'17,71;11:r: •• . ••••,' •-• 7•Tifi'41?-•;;141•IM'ft*F411;wie2erttii-71:-:.••tc.044-9: .,,-.,----•;Zitf.i,:,,Kt'•414. 4 ''.f' 't..,,TIT'. . 111.77......:7:;4::i,''..• •*,..-'•''',P,k...4,S.1 •,4xer(2,A4exoP.J.et4,44..xi,::,--•i*,r1:1,. ;•:D:l.:",•:1!,--.1.-........•....5.:i.,..k6.?"'...7‘t" ' '... ,.....: ..-%•. .1.1-4,-;';?,/rS: . ' ...••:'7•.;!..•-ic!:,, ..:',V!fidee.741.T'-;;."1...*',•574.tif.FT......<-,:.,,,,C-.i.•:rc,;1•-••,:-.....;',LA.r.l.ar..Z.,- - :,..,‘ .. ".• .14-5;"%:,,,•••••• • • • '' ' -s.:..-51• .0411.SHify.. 11./....f -:.4";,;:,c.., . ..,;i•.:-,;._,--:'L'il,: ,,,: ‘.4'' ...-.' '..rf..,-,:.‘4;:272.,..fgl'f.i..!;.*• , •.,...,. •. „.•..'.,.•.-`..,.',,.''..f.:,.''.‘;.•:.:•;''''.••*,,1,,4...'.:..''.!'.%..',.:''.Y'•','7,'1;.''1,.S•..:11.1;':':4:;''.7r..,.,tr;;6,;rr4:,*'.';4.,,1.A'4,..l•,:"t-.-Af4.-P:i..-:1•47.,;4A14':L,',..;,I1`/C,P4f6-71',.4 6: -:7; L...',J,1r,,-n, •rs'r,l.e ritio4t.4;!J.•t:14":T'-'7-i::4"-..e i."t'.• v--1f.-.'*...!i› 14a1IV 4 ' . M r „.•."..'!T0'';7'.1-4•;ri.-1-'•-.*A.:?"',-..--.;Mi-."-4"`...Z1I,P.131.Pif'!l.'„?/;**'.;/..-. A r,."7. 9 ) =-,.:''fli,,e-,_,,-,-,_!,':-:1 _ t• 1„.- j!,,,.'`4,,,.••' 114`a..7...!.•. ....;;;-'4'1''' -'""......••:"' 4,41';'.1.:}4,4‘•_.r,iilit,;7,-44":.• • ,.... 1.•• ''''•'•Irri,t.:-X. •-•?' . 4;.'=•s,f''').: ,:•kr;' •' 7.7.43';,7.'.;:;1!'..:' . ••••?-4•-.•'-'•••••14'.-:;.;Y..'•'."..rc.,1°' If.'411i•• •'•"'''''. '''' 1'Hr*. •An''''-e.fr‘V.-tr ' g14.:- .-% 7..',.:;.,..tor,.1*:',;':.,',.."!••.1441; ' '.., •. •:.::-,-•;i:.;:;1,.??7-•,.,-5.,431, ...._=.'• eilli.••••'.1 CvE• • ' _;•';•j'•'''' .• I I •1.4,:•.,., . ••;...: •'•- ' ••t'..•••:::', •• •••. f.4.4:,::.1.” t et,* •. • :-•:i••i•';•1'.:.. '1,7!P.:'11.:i. •.-•,,,..,.: .---;'•,•-.9':-...-;..d.4;- ,-• •-•.;.; -,;:..;:.. • i fl:ht;• -'-i'..i.-.„1„,12;„:,,,-..,wy "r---Artpt.::,..,..• .. .. ,. ,. .... . • ..•::: •...4,,,,.. ,.....• ..• ......:•,,..• ... . w 4 . 4 ....e.r,4•17k. .. '. i *-7-',? -..)L..•.'..',4749...-V.,,.,•".. • ,,,,..-i::::- , .ii,:-• . , . : ....,.;..,;if.,.. ..,,,,,...• .:;. ..-: • - •4,4p. ,-;T.,./.,:.fi. 1 ni.-t•r,;.11.B.i. - 5'•:.•T4-3- " .-_,-7.: • ',..;Att.' .;;;:,;:-1,‘,.::' I •,•,...'•-;.,•:1,.:1,7,.. . Al • •..."L'''' • :3,)r t..4.;•.•;•:' ."' ;-:.4.:.'';':.!-:•••:.,_ .. . ,/,t,,. .• •.•.1.. •• :,-..'tf?.r..:..7t;•••• s i Yalta:.,I,.- ,--..-----P *iip..-../. • .74.,i• .. :-.. . .. .. ,.....,,, ...4.0416160. ;...4 , 47 ,el, • • . ..*. .. ..,,,,•..-- „,„-,,,,,a ..... -g•••1, „7'. ;miler . ,...,.1.;...,(.:.: -.:„. •:.::: -It z•..:-.1.: ,• .. ; p....:-.:(4., - t •,,,. .it ,;4•.:-..' . 1 •...'-f;,-;f,,-..: :.-:::..-= 1 -..-:. 7i-.1 '.....• ..ft9erte:L. • • -,*-';•••,:.. '. • , •-;"'.''.:11?t*-V,.' ±...'.":-...;:2 ' i ' .-., :--....'' ". rmailtr 7.: ':.... . ." .‘ •.•..?...^. ;r:; t . r :•,.#,t;•41 ; '*,4•He. . i'-:-..:‘'.;',.•-•'-. fr,• ....1:-......1'.e.',:, ... ,• ' -:'.',-.7,1.:,.f4," 7.7.-i5,7.2.3.; • , .. 4 • •,",-:-.;.1;77' :.%I: • 10,,-.•4.\,, A ! ....V.,*.• 4.44. •••••••• i .... ? .4. it;:,/,..:.,, • •-;;.:,7,,,,,,,....:r. ...,-,:•.--,:-, - ..v •-..,,,,-..:JIM':; •.:::.:::.:::.--1:, . . , ',;,5.. ...., :.-2.-..= ,„f,.;i,„ . •.. .. ......,.,,.., - ot .. V ....., ,.::',:,f;i.i.:;:2 '-',:.i-14- • ..,.. ,.. -;•.'.5.'7•••••••;••.1•••%.:::7 ••• lal•'•,:qiil • ` .7:: ' • - :0.,. r ,:'...,',....:/' • .•. ' 1.'••f-•.'5,1•!..' :::: :4- ' • - .•i• 7.7.. 7.1•.••*t..' . t4r••. ,•." •:(. ' • T• Ar(.4,,. •t••• . . •' ,' ti•AP. •--. '.7-'. r••;---;•' ••'''''ir."!••h..1...:.7-7 r.., ;i•••.i .. •, • *li, ', '''..::'•;;;/,`1•*??;;97.;;Ctity," ,...,..4 .::••• ;.,....r.... ''-".•••••,,:,,,:', •-'-' =Z.' v;i::...12'd :'• •'''. r;..'::::-.'7.7, 1,,,,1 ,. ,.. .c.,..,. ,,,.,,,...g,..,.,../ .„....,,...(01,-y,:IF, . • ,...1...-w;,-,::. ..7'.::- --7f ••••..1.1•••;:', :'•/,''A.'," • ••• '....4..:..i.'-. - , '..'.,i; ;'•.'. '1.i rj;•-.).r1/4 '- 4,7;4•A?..4'-gig,,ii•1..).,4;-•-• :. , • -.:. i:,..i.,•;•:.-.:-.- 7-•t-,, 114%1;;- '11-•4«'!".•-....,-••-;•-:.; •:',, 4-,•;‘,.,' '' ...,:'.-•..:-'-•.,-•• , ernfift;•74,:P-..o..,,i";•;;;21-;141-4i.,,____ii.ifi..F7,-,,y1-Aff i::;• .:•.•:.- 1 ••''i'';.;'.•;:flr.",''a.,f;;;. .F.F..:..t.,.5.7,-:..r.•4 sk;;;...:1.,...,;:i...,..„,,,I.........;........ ,,,,, , ... eit.,,,,t,....,,,,,,,i-,7,...:.,,,,, ..-, .:,,,,,,,,s.,., •,: . , .'.'-x.Pt",-1-*.::'-- l'yet4fIlt.,.,:4,,.,.,fg..z-_-:3 4.,.. 1..._ --- : ,;Ny.,,i,,,4, .• -..4. 5f.4:s'f.:-Av..----:.,-...,,,,..::?.,:; ....--.. , — -.'" : :.,,,,k;i:"..,-,,-,,...":11-, .. • ••-...:„ 4t:',.t.• . ,..'4,1-' IT-r--.34 • '.M.••••••Vrttlirie: • , .•,':' ``,i.7...Patiesg,,, , ./4,,lihic!- '.•• . . -- .ere,,,p,:;-:,-::• • :i'--.-- .--.:?ei-..-' .' f.T.?,. AVRAzi- ---— " • S. 44.44.4 • re,,f.4.174,prt,• .-....., .-K .. .-..'...1 - .- . ..: ...,... • ....... • • ,, t•••-...'........r:41„,51.t0, .4..`•• ...: • • •''''"'-':,•••-Y....1'''"P'lir4..,‘'.4"'• • . •.' •• . ' Tt';'::..- ,.jitr.•., • . . _......,„....,--,. .s•.-..A.,,..!;.:%;,:-.-,-....,..„.:.:..,..,,r4,•.; , • ' --•---: :.--••--- t;',.r-7,':771.,'-, '..,:.•'ip*'-t'•4!":1;?!.....,.,';7•. • • . . . .".. • *.' '..r.--• •...• ',,-,..--' .;-.-•;• '• •• .:."''.•;•.':‘,;..,-:1 6••.!,,,,•gt-,,...r...-r....4, '*. •• -• -• - ...;'"'" •'. ,. .. "•,?!•,-..:;;;44,......• '• . Xf',1•,,,i,;;;::.;,,..4....,..,,,.• ::. • .t• ',".4i.:r.,-'.:,;..,.. ,*i;.,—::-:.---,:p.,4:.•• :,..• - •• • :-.....::::,L;...'i.,....,,', ...,..-• . . ......•„..,7,..0..,,,:::,,,..c., .... •:,-;-_,'.."..t:..k-tr,..c..--;;;?1,;.:, ";::::;t:..".7.1..:-—.'":•.....::.•.',,;.i.:,..,;.,.e.,,,,,,,r,..7„,..„,,,.. ...._,..14,,,,,;::,.:.: ." ,..,..,.,.....,..,.....F,.. .,..??.,-,-.....-..--....,A,:i.i.,:...--t-,..,.,i •:. :•-• ... i .. . - . .. . .. , ..,,y...... ..-.:cc...:•,,,,.!-.,.... 0,-.. ....-iolgi.': .".',:5+qt7i;.".,,..1,,,":,..•' -,,,,..'7. , ...,`!Fl:".;:.•,.."•••••••:.1.4;-^',"!!,.14•L -....,,,,..' :•. •.....'-'if'4444,/..i.fl:',,--, :''. '" -' ,-il ‘,..,..•. IL-,,I,, .ii,liA . ..,.."•:-•-•* •,- • ..,,- ;,..../:'-'.4,-"'!4.!" ... '' . •. ......... -*** *;:4...(i./.•;;.''''''''*".'.'.., ' ••• '-:‘..,,':-:..7:. ":.•:,...:.-••.:,- , • . ..., • • ":... 7.:......"4-', .:.:: . - .. . ' . . „ . A PROPERTY SALES STUDY OF THE IlbYPACT OF GROUP HOMES IN MONTGOMERY COUNTY Conducted By The Magin Realty Company 9 Introduction The.purpose of this study is to determine whether the use of group homes for individuals with mental retardation has had any adverse effect upon the value of the properties in the neighborhoods in which these homes are located. This appraiser has made a complete study of the market as to type of home and sales price prior to the time of occupancy by the homes. A study was then made of the sales in the area after occupancy of the homes by the "Mentally Retarded" to see if the occupancy of the homes had any adverse effect on the neighborhood. Process In assembling the data as to the effect the"Group Homes" had on the individual neighborhoods, this appraiser followed these procedures: 1. First the housing market was studied in each individual neighborhood prior to the location of the "Group Home."Sales of homes were examined and analyzed as to demand,selling price,time on the market and average selling price per square foot. 2. After the individual "Group Homes" were purchased, the housing market was again studied. We wished to determine whether any adverse reaction would reflect in panic selling in the immediate area.We also wanted to learn whether the homes near the"Group Homes"would suffer a loss in value. when sold compared with houses several blocks distant. This reflects itself in,average time on the market compared with homes outside the effected area or a significant difference between sales price as a percentage of list price. 3. This appraiser also spoke with several of the owners near each of the"Group Homes"in order to learn If their reaction to the placement of the "Homes" in their neighborhood. 1 10 Findings A frequent basis for neighborhood opposition to the location of a"Group Home"in a neighborhood is the fear that property values will suffer due to deterioration of the neighborhood or the reluctance of buyers to purchase a home near such a facility:The only way to resolve such a fear is to actually go to the housing market which is the purpose of this study.For the seven"Group Homes"studied,there was no evidence to warrant any effect on property values. due to the location of the "Group Home" in any of,the neighborhoods. In several cases in the study, neighborhood reaction was negative and very vocal at the outset. The Sheehan Road home was opposed strongly by the neighbors. Several of the nearby homes were immediately placed on the market and sold at lower than market prices. After a year, this situation appeared to correct,itself and the housing market returned to normal. I feel that the biggest fear that neighborhoods have of a"Group Home"being located near them is the visibility of the home in the neighborhood.While a large percentage of the residents within the first block of a "Group Home" are aware of its presence; this percentage decreases the farther away they live. A "Group Home" obtains its visibility primarily through communications among friends and neighbors or the news media. This appraisers analysis of the location of the "Group Home" in Montgomery County has indicated: 1. The "Group Homes" are consistent and compatible'to neighboring properties in type and size of structure. 2. Generally, the "Group Home" function is not conspicuous from the street or neighboring properties. ' 3. The "Group Homes" are better maintained than the surrounding properties as to outward appearance, landscaping, etc. 4. The "Group'Home" residents are generally not visible or noticeable from the street. With respect to the impact of"Group Homes" on surrounding properties: 1. Property values in neighborhoods with ",Group Homes" had the same increase (or decrease) in market prices as other similar neighborhoods. 2. The close proximity of neighboring properties to a"Group Home"did not significantly affect their market values. ' 3. The adjacent properties did not experience property valuedeclines; and 4. The establishment of the"Group Homes"did not generate a higher degree of neighboring property • turnover than in other similar-neighborhoods. In conclusion, this appraiser was unable to find any evidence to warrant any conjecture of an effect on property values due to the location of the"Group Home"in any of the seven neighborhoods in this study. . . 1 2- l/ • .. t• �I !� . W P . _fr - . ii • 4. n/ ..:.,s I if---E--A ray t i t. r r ' . , . /LIM : a 9 rw• r—� a. + L.. r a - I wt.t•„ • •, a�i'•ig(c •• I pried r ( i "/".. ' i ,litei•0 f Mt.tai1/4,,,), • f' "; ( 1 .yM1` Leo. Ia. ; 'p��jj� Ai "�� ..- ww. .r i I i , i. .111,11..11 iPl .. • 61111117. lic3' �, „se*. '''' . IM II I : �' I` • •• „TIP ��` I i 1 I I � a � • . ll ,i 1 I a ` 12 . 1 ' ,•... Liu i. _ .1 I I - iI _ i • i' ril • I �'I I IN. I © ' agstrom Co. • 3 • CV ADDRESS: 9525 Sheehan Road Centerville,, Ohio �t t :' :� OWNER:. Montgomery County Board of Men _ �.r... Y .Y.'hq'•y S tal.Retardation DATE OF LOCATION: July 1, 1974 "leg LOCA �+�� � NUMBER_OF RESIDENTS: 6 � � • ti , NUMBER OF STAFF: 3 Full-time 3 Part-time _. Ntr? _ ���,t�ua'w�Y ..>v.=': @��`r���•C SiT7"'��;��SE'.��h•� .+ • Summary Of Analysis: All real estate transactions in the neighborhood of the facility for twenty-four months prior to and subsequent to July 1, 1974 were collected. In total,seventeen transactions were collected and analyzed. After thoroughly analyzing the sales in the area prior to July 1, 1974,this appraiser found the area to be active for real estate sales.Prices in the immediate area were in the$40,000 price range or approximately $22.00 to $23.00 per square foot. After July 1974,several homes by the subject were placed on the market.This was no doubt due to fear of the "Group Home"being in the area.All of these homes were sold at a profit, however, the appreciation was less than normal indicating an anxiety to sell. • The Homes in the area are now selling at$65,000 to$80,000.These prices vary as to size,condition and desirability of each individual property.The actual sales price is comparable to prices paid for properties in similar neighborhoods. - The results of the study showed that there was no significant difference between average time on the market before and after the location of the group home in the neighborhood.There was also found to be no significant difference between sales price as a percentage of list price before and after the location of the "Group Home" except for the first few months. It is apparent that once the panic selling passed, prices returned to normal. Except for the past year which saw the tight money market and extremely high interest rates, the market in the area has been active.The prices paid for the homes reflect the desirability of the area in the -purchasers' eyes. .. - • • , , . . . . . . • •4 oat ' - ' I i .,,,*WINS I I,p-; i I 11.14.Lja 1 I orciaa 1: f--34 1.-7;=II.- ica.fi i gll ghtilil I . . . .0_.._,_. ,„ _ _•:, 2 A_ .- --- ..i:111CNCATI:OU-.,1' e• -..-o -LI • • L-...--•1-__./I • -/- 4./ -•1 s ION A • 1..-1 se/ hi imam. ,„Do•c,.i.1m1i tni cr iA . 1s aa l I2IICOiN */0008.. 0g .5rA.'!0S=.tR-1I11A-'1 2:&M"OL r-71uE-,s‘f0-----..r-c i.c1t Tioi1 lstiiiii;.n,-it : ,.:.1.00.1. •ICN-IN20a0 aCirI ii-g-T,-; • „_,.,,...... 2-,--" 1--____J En ',coo°0ii A ,thiLoi 1200 i VI II 4 li al.:. i rum. a? C-.-111111 Oa L-0...4 CrAiVION •)(n j JULESsCal •0 !.6 EL__-_ii . . fir I a .• . . 0 Ad AyEC . . . , It a-- . .71. . x I 3 t L.._!. ..., , ..... 11; rANTINVOI P.ci .4., 7. tis. 13a0.11[:rirszi ./. • Ali• 43111-111---1°. Mal ma -2' r_r IIIMC!NINON ON r-ei 1.f.".4! - ::: i . ...........n1 s ..-::• e. OALI ....iv WO iNii : Itk„,/,.....,...-----j --1,- I soot. i "INNS UV °MARSHA°CIO '4" ' No Ia AtWOODZDN ir gi-, ITN 04 2 tumuli Rol I'V▪ILOCUSIWOq '-ri. •4*Ics'"4‹.S(.6e° ..." i 1-----!LNOSIIII r• . . . 'r".1 oe.,49 ‘‘\..% "-.• atIANN rril 1 0 1'gra... Ilicete ri i 4W-1,3 --,R.SrITIZI DODDI , . COACNININIC/ 3CILDIDamb,' i swaiduit*.*:"......." 7:11 ! - Z= 3 /,.. •&.0`4<%\l, i y.2C-ir '" SU rOS ati•-•--- . . . 'WIWI LA a o rz o aff .•it,r--• -J I'4. ...s% '''N 7 ,-;:.,Al_. 2,j)/1_.• c:::3 EL,....__ ___ • . •-•1 .......,k„,. .., L., war= . _osm li.p,. .--.,)!.4\.A.....1:11[12• rzEssOt2.12.9 NSHAIN ON- . ilium' -.---=.3 Coerell ' ' IOU!! ttlA, • $ . : ..,..€ . ....4Y,-07"......-•-•-..--761, n. IM N..*C 2C,7,7( 11010Call„ e 0_, , .,.4 : . tr---... .g D ..,.. 7 •461: 4. 'Pc, of-VI I...-$CANSOALI ON i Ciaa A ,,Vor-ne figit "..41•0 I /14 511"1._!71.111 .1 .1_,E - , .._„.1 ANON*, a \ t % 4- ' prel :2.-•••• CIOITSWill 011 . ItL11.43\,. a ia,„„ ____PalailMINT pi "u0a --I'd "1"1"4"DI 1100 . . . . .. ,...- •-• „,;.,.: L-......% se ....... -0 es 9 3333 II I .- I. . - 000 6-10 „ t ••:. at I 1 t. )1111\41 e. . a - A z a 13 .q_ 1..NAS7INCI ND___1 .. ._.'9 ta- . ire :,'• " " x . 2100*000ilia gag, -... +,. .e. . 1• 0. E.DIR\\<1 . . • L . 0 a ......::: a 01 -1••• 1 a 1 iigs -tam ao E-----=_-, .,____.. r, .17 Milli 110---- ''' i I* . 02_ .113U osa'As 2 .• 2 CID. 7SIGG".0 a DD air: a 9 fr wing', 1 • cc's, • : 4 " a 6=7: 4.4-- 1t;J::r:-.1 "" 1.3_it:-(...at.,.7,.1-1,tv-,......icrii,NNium--1, • 04,. ./..7 - F. 5 . .ki vi, ‘...? Main Oil ,fr,........„„--- 19_0p,m,Do is ..., 0.1 2 = r. 7...;,. , .Vb i a..„„r Ills . ! c -.. d,%, -If.c"-flisr-):I o. • 1 a077 IIII .----:%.---ts. 74-„,r,u. c ...nry = 01 zi.e...;+- -a 13- Irfe44.4,2 .ri • ,.. , 4 4 4 1 N . Nit%146 1 kk/'/A c 41/Y ri •1' ,s, -.`Yr°"") ? UN a,--..)1 • I .4' ---ii- Z2,71,4a4.11-1.2,._, • 1 a Tilriki"%I (01,4,t••• t 1117 • 44.>";;., 0'0-.0 A' iir .0-4c...._t..,/ oi o7z. / - ir23r. , ,,.. . s cel uN ....:/.., 4.."." - i..\.., / ,,,..t.• 4. I,I -.......... ..0-,3- %%1 / 4 ,.%., . „co .• niuolA 4,. •,:.: ..---••••••7!•••• -1. . 1114•003-) ;4 ...- *** .,10 - .4.4 ,e411 MIL DI , 1 4/%4- ar'•••••• %, rittit...2::.\ ***III ;iv:. .:Iiiiiii:iE::::- ' i L j_j.:1,71( I ... ...fas ' 2 4,v• ,7 !LISS Pt I 4. 1./0:4 ... DDi.......- ::••::1:::::ii::::::::::::iii. • .1 3 0.0. „r% . fia4,4 I" z : I il -et-joihs om-z-N ,-,1--suichaau 11- ...... :.............:,......, v, ti.i. tron. .............. ....'•••••- - . ,2 • • .1.-/- . . 44 lAtfiiiiiEiEi::::::::::i. / liji it :_ps-, MINIMA DA </. Sit,is.tX X, • T.61....-• g 2, IP • ..: ........: ' nine 2 n n r----;-.Ic. /I "ir i • C-.--!-- 6)`!"1 A6-i j . _ . 11.1:*15"3:.;. / wpm 11, 1-1 oe 1 jei _ .bo • 4,4•:` % r:k---/ 47: • t tilt MONTGOMERY CO I liowTeirtY/E, ciricoi.•ss+ ---; 4,, M i I 11- ,4_1'. g ht.--•”----bA -.........iicaa os ICJ . . Cie s ::::::.:::.• .. "nonacid!,ruu,-- C=E------;;•- •-• '4 e/A ' I al<0.1211 .......14: q.S0 . \ . I-:---.._.=_.-n 1.• 27 '4-- 5 -. , i . _ .. . Mil. li, 2 2 2 • g . 12. GREENE CO„ . 4. ii_i_. I STROOPRO-------.-1'•---- . 4- . ----7(----11-a-V --- --- 1 Beavercreek Twp. E " • 4NU4Aeitninr.a . \ ... • a a oie-T-5 PRoPosED 1-67 14 5 • • 1 . CID I ati---- ‘ • 04113 . --. illei-lr . .._ . . . .......• ...,-- ........ s., . Di" a ......" •• i%MAW' r-I A ----L''. . It at i i • 41 -• . ---, • •. • • . . __,... • -c--- . ' • . . . . • ADDRESS: 2035 Springmill Road t; Ketteri x.t • :t •. •�_ng, Ohio r{ "' OWNER: The Resident Home Association ;? • == for the Mentally Retarded -:. ... . ,. a� .`n . .:... .,;:.4�K� of Greater Dayton, Inc. ®ice: ti DATE OF LOCATION: June 27, 1977 = ;r ••'• NUMBER OF RESIDENTS: 8 ; ?� '� ?j n:� ��S Y -.A�'•',�-:L.ci•�, •'9'f4yy�3."'.�rY`��''7-w NUMBER OF STAFF: 3 Full-time a"° r, x .f;•< t�k. n�' �. �: . , „^,-� ?'� .,.i-TSL�1-' c.•h7-...t.,4'.,Y..- ..�y. b,ijlkri " e*.1J;; 1 Part-time "' �''"� �-' ,ram, �.• .,r••,,.�.;-� � �- Summary Of Analysis: All real estate transactions in the neighborhood of the facility for twenty-four months prior to and subsequent to June 27, 1977 were collected. In total, •19 transactions were collected and analyzed. The subject property is located in the Oak Creek development,a prestige plat developed by four quality builders. When the,plat was first started approximately 15 years ago, homes sold for$30,000 to$40,000. They have presently appreciated to the$75,000 to$95,000 price range which reflects the desirability.of the neighborhood. Prior to June 1977 the area was very active for real estate sales.Prices in the immediate area were in the $55,000 to $70,000 price range or approximately $25.00 per square foot. . After the location of the"Group Home"in 1977;this appraiser could find no evidence of panic selling in , - the immediate area. V V The subject property is extremely well maintained and is very compatible with the neighborhood.There is no evidence from the exterior that the house is occupied by other than a single family resident. The homes in the area are now selling at$75,000 to$95,000.These prices vary as to size,condition and desirability of each individual property.The actual sales price is comparable to prices paid for properties in similar neighborhoods. . . . • The results of the study showed that there was no significant difference between average time on the market before and after the location of the group home in the neighborhood.There was also found to be no significant difference between sales price as a percentage of list price before and after the location of the "Group Home." Except for the past year which saw the tight money market and extremely high interest rates, the market in the area has been active.The prices paid for the homes reflect the,desirability of the area in the purchasers' eyes. • 6 /� .. . . . ell no; ■I�Cro..r•;� Iris. i l ^ /J LjQ 1,�i0 G^u-v�^\ • ' \ -- ----------- -- -- - r;- aO�•-�►�flt ' = - --_�i,�'� •p g O•• ------ -- - - -- --- ' � Ks:um - '- o cl: _-�— o .- --r�• c,- Ole — - d� o •rCrJut .! # * NO 1r� • : II :11(-a{r \ pp prof sQOS (Yll T.0 1f NIIt.'�.. ,.1 Y7),�°O 11E 1 �_oL$�I�C w•110..0 o ills �♦ 4 Ill' �. [ ...In ��-+�r r m�c.(•t y -O�f y� %�� p `Lo {OlN■C Lrt S •�,�G°'�---•�•--/LJ�ti� S/A 1■ l00/1■dllr /4,..1.1q: ♦ {LYp Ltllt t' .♦ J� rI . .NOR(. r-GU o ©TN.I.■0 rI 1 C ocg4r i ' L [',uu.0.r ,, a t~ INgOI Ir II 11 �I L- -:� .o �. o CRlsr 111[Srli�/Cv�� •i��' 1100 L J.YOa �_=7 �j"•`-`• O♦it •p I i (t0. * ��I` . , • �Gw.,ll s liMY 9♦i�,c+tu(rtl.r. nt O 0 YEl ilA.Y[ ��p- r• `. Mr�010, •� ISOaN yy�CUI o, t♦Ji li.s —n�rem a'• "` ` ctllLwl.. . C-•� WE3TYl[W.Y!llT i -4 0/Ir+Al7S a� ,i �•a - - . \v i •- �RUCDluta .>.° .�. q00 ,t•7 G�d b.0 "vino �j, CI` '..''•.� ` �0 ,, ♦J..! l _ a . .�I`1) {..DI{I .(I o ' iAIO_i --J 7Hq ( � '�s1P'", O�A •O\ 0•,• ` ap0' �I�rOS1Y.1, '.' ..•,111 I I C . . . e~�Uul-IJ"a�+ t_ \ �� • :� ^�� O a• �.�U Q(u'�1N0■t : , :•3 3 a mul•00 11 ^'�r :\,: `_ 1 a �- °� _oLc'��SO Q.•:i rYU{./.r D{ .100 •,ttD11 �s •:...�' �` ::0 • r[11:11111101• factl- � I 1�'�/- 1 �i \ ♦0 - Vo • i .: Y 7 Yi.4WD0D a_J: •. �:: .Itll .r,•, 0•.OMr n _,rCl11.E ...Li ; ^/ A� % \' '::' 1`i % Ltt ft 6rERTI..CDr ...i,(/�]�r MW0001'�/ 1 .fll: 1 : a`••�u q�; D�WMY ' l rllrl .II---�. ail, 'I" O„ly I : rit• : ��-'���,nlu . U II II .�..c. rnllo ((n�ac.ur 1 11 L ' : I° •``' 2 _ trfv • - :: i. ■1.{I■ \/Y9",Ir j s,41,1-II n IT[R II fief 2 J O� A *-irfNlr 1 p5' • \ \':;.. ri___ /tOrINl4 a ®� p01 r141[R? J �I,Np � o o : �Liik. � I. $ 's � `\M•iR • '= �' •�`•i..:. � \.;1i T I •• OA / R Ilawlll LiM tll kil i AI •t 1wt Ao[A�.7 ..r•/..Y Or . .act , ',r*+� +4[Y.MDEND. J�{�� Tll�r Into, ilinv 1�' , `�. •..•.: e'..'.,.' 1. ' . 6IiI 1-4 i COM�� �o itlr.r� ,0•` = 7 �� 1,n�u 4••::i:::.. ::i:::::•.. .•:;:.; 'i1 •Oro` o i _2 "- �o ' ! 7,..r,tn. +IIt , 1`::::?. `_ °+ft i o ,.::fill::- s• ' \� f■�t`�/,•7 WOODrµ011 rjQ�rLvrtlr� ii :i.':::•::•:i:::::•'' -'IrOrDY4 D- rat .21 O -co of 10 y 4„ N �..':i::''•. fill ' 1 r !r ' c g = �- qI�\ it ; I ' r !r'11 :. .rS- UL8 Yri.(�L.I`p1,7. o I..011..• , , �. \ \ ,•:• : �::; •1 : ' ::. 0 00.1 U F 1F- waq a ♦ ter. • siii.:f::: L,c ' � �� a^ ; n t�����' •4' Sty �.. rr,r '_] J ` :: :: " .cer o -. ,y_.. .ICON•YIII l.. TK - /• •.: .: .:: ' :: lll..l—. I o: f000NI1Uyl +.plltNl CT g/ Irpl..�n fir/. `,i r�wfst ' 1":: :: _� Q ��a SU 4�0`t0 a ,: ':•rill:: ��IU❑ .71 l I ur pi 1014,l■D rill...:...... .:•.. .�::.:::.>. Ell" r Il.rl a-1 lYOI t*0♦ic----...—zii_____Iim,.0. +`Co „maul Of. F Af W 'I�♦ t�t`I\'::'::..:.7 , r■I AD[OIA, MESTErp �� if. _ 6 oa^' • .::� - . rot oft p_o_r...e.Af i.fir';',-,-) . sC11( �'004 ma._ l AIM 0 rt1-2O 44 Ifl"YI.51____Htor -� .5.0 '' 'a .. \ : w�. g rietg..-.C ii O iiD.ML gyp/ N ♦/ = s :'C S; - �0 Mlrll=a " arWlr URC ll'lY 4 OA rn.�....(( - ��'-" I '•: s i -.. . ' i E 00`1 .. qe �'. -raUr■OR tGCYr1Y ri 42 1 • e _ . S, w Lip �� / v .1 : 3 xuFnlOR Uol.�1 �LL�,V�-oo"r��'o a^ roR(�jp I s��,��C`.I w ft i, wSAS o���.0 m O '..-- . TOREW000 DII"�-Fi=YY_i t a r-nC:::: 3 •.. ••. WILLOWG.II■ ,MON.YE Drs ,y,� f*- /1 - : .:.....- am-; ADDRESS: 3310 East.Third Street Dayton, Ohio a, 1 �' ' im^a OWNER: The Resident Home Association ;' fin-the Mentally Retarded of =-^ • Greater Dayton, Inc. t ;4 = F DATE OF LOCATION: April 12, 1972 NUMBER OF RESIDENTS: 8 .� ,'> - S 'S' � s `� �.. • NUMBER OF STAFF: 3 Full-time <1v - r*-1.4„7 ,`. 1 Part-time � ,�, � � • _ "• y'�'� yam'Summary Of Analysis: All real estate transactions in the neighborhood of the facility for twenty-four months prior to and subsequent to April 12, 1972 were collected and analyzed. After thoroughly analyzing the sales in the area prior to April 12, 1972,this appraiser found the area to be active for real estate sales.Prices in the immediate area were in the$15,000 to $20,000 price range or approximately $10.00 per square foot depending on condition. After April 12, 1972,this appraiser could find no significant change in the home sales.There was still an active market and I was unable to find any depreciation in value due to the location of the"Group Home" being located in the area. The homes in the area are now selling from$15,000 to$27,500.These prices vary as to size,condition and desirability of each individual property.The actual sales price is comparable to prices paid for properties in other similar older neighborhoods. The general area is an older blue collar neighborhood with some of the housing in a substandard condition. This is reflected in the sales price of the individual homes. East Third Street is a mixture of businesses and single family homes.The area has declined over the years and maintenance of the individual properties has been poor. This has kept property values at a minimum. . The results of the study showed that there was no significant difference between average time on the market before and after the location of the"Group Home"in the neighborhood.There was also found to be no significant difference between sales price as a percentage of list price before and after the,location of the "Group Home." - Except for the past year which saw the tight money market and extremely high interest rates, the market in the area has been active.The prices paid for the homes reflect the undesirability of the area in the purchasers' eyes. 8 ; , l7 .■rGIG a • e .I • r : um pi �t POINT1,71i o• 1 in l- I I.—uEas tui , r- I ..1I� - - - -- — --_ -- ------ - SIN OS n I NRN 171 I r Ya/ll si /• 1ii */�/lli fT ir7. 1.,-- (L �i II 11 r �LlLE l I SIMMS E UNIo■aD ,_It• •••f • i fJ 11NIlRl[IMC p■1 i D C I �n • �" �^� •-uncr 10- t NDu off/, ►LUSA.........���JJJ' �' �� r� ats ¢ AI : =S0t0Y1.STfa� �;:mist MI Si : �,• oh= g-/TUIII DR—: 'r� r ��J �� • _ •= 4L1 ILL 3 ' Cplfytr ar( vz •. Q■a0-[�TNfORO DI �„ 1. 3.IleM�-0--/�T L✓P oaU�` "J1.° prpn.J L O - C s ralst/■Cr r �. r �n 4 /`►7qr �vpllur �Lr- �afawryh[tN11oo0C? IICRrppp t• um'. O 1 q IIIOs1U I I`, YO D.r4 o ••\nno .� I GIMCl1'�I E : �TUCR_Ml[OT.O�r ■1lMGU[ Li - 1 ^I , Ir _ 1 IL._ O _� Y/OUff M e l`.l--i 4 r a.TN Mr[Ili C ,,,,,mu 0 r11ru1 _- DU`■IIC—o WSs0117 [@ aCI�I It es„,.. II � `� ' !�� ��o 01 •� j} SIa1071I .0• I : all ( r ►a .Nlluw[No rilr pR� ���NunroaD n I 1(f��1I:I +� • ° PII '�►�� o .L�LJS •4 a +L'TA1V'alOr11 CII •i IISW. Q/'S' o Ia/ON11/ .■ l'7 ,./ yl� / A* , •�iI * I LPL; v. so . PF7 1 `c �.ppo • ►1lYrpOD ` I . = r, o A Yk'ON[ 0 A r11 = 5 o f 4LL J\ 77 • .1 Ilea T' IC-�i• = ! •.11SU1�Y s o'�C-�..�,c ,�U1. o D11TI ID Is '— �1 4 11 SUM MO o[ • � l tLD L ) ' 7[1:1— I '5 1201N11 , YO[3Orrl� DINCII M a`►c' C' ' /a a ( 0 7�Q Ao• li .! I * I an g L j--.. IOlb Men !! �`/Trot.woll Corp lleo '"W 1 arts M-•- C •r y111�� • • SC e!`! •i I �Yl 7 I'L- .0IDO/� tlt"�vtulrn MT.IDRS �•1 UY1r�N • `` rJ� ,�/ 1(( fL% _ r1' )7u[I IT• ►ly=M 'O // mantas D. I 7'nsali o Rl R1( I i IS-TDOyOUNT ID 'IL1 ■ORYpa 4• j _�K IOP �=—Z .c 1 ► o`i, ••car.i 1 i' A ` g 4i�*•♦� -�� nil (/�o�•�O-1-Np�l ,= 9 !` '� ��i�JC �rr.p«Corr.tip. V �O �'.J1{7 It.../� z J (i mIemos/v.+-r' OIL DI "`f� ,� Q [oY�� �,���� -WILT %,. �"-n�= k o� �r---,-, .rr4--24cslum. ---nso of . snit c •,+�t I= 11IUY■IUCN tlr0 �_J A �r `_C�J g o\ 0°F�— L `= 1 l_■r,.0 4•IOIIIIO i •r �, C�+o ` tCl. G� l aa -Bali!M II I ��• y 1C J��ow•` CNl r lTp� .iiT19411 I 1 ' It p lei e• r�lool■Gto.oa • �• r1i11 pi .I■p •Y:�� 0■Il■oa. ,1w, IrlraCl.NtN. �� < € 1 S fOi N 111� Ia�lr„ -44. G� illitt.Z1.: ■taro■Y=�21J i •arl7 UO■IIG ■100110■ar I fall GW.plalp . u minim -. I c1:2_35i(�L�1Tr0a.a J I„dr[t - nn I all lalOD. fILL NO.nu : �.�IU Mmar_ R =� UL1<<I Lal(t1ll.=� I I .�. . r�rirtCall.l■u us a 11 I �y. JG1llat.olTM^Il1LY1. =r�0 tom I�t'iili11 al '1�11I �� _ �1^�� :uul�( .�;� �: . na"oDI� �____ �� i . 2 = -i.-.nowt n �1 s I-u - - ADDRESS: 5138 H rton Drive , :, �:.•- • : J »'` Bathe ThJ• �" Madison Township •'.' Dayton, Ohio 45426 . • . ,,',� r� r .� � r +�.s. ' mi• l• J , r A "Sy t l J OWNER: Montgomery County Board of `�� .� xr-�-r�' a yr� •!' f.e f z_-5•.._./ i G � Mental Retardation N �# ' . r • Y': �'�- •4. i t�, _ •L'ti r n• -k to�L 9's 4, .^r,roc. r k _ DATE OF LOCATION: March 8, 1977, �� 'ter' ' • { " 's• .�{,yy�.v .k fJ� s .i 1 '` +•`v 7` f �`� w ir��T wing 1 - ,2 N- NUMBER OF RESIDENTS: 6 �'} ` tFh r NUMBER OF STAFF: 4 Full-time ., t w �y , 3 Part-time ,�,;. �, : � ,.,"1" y. • Summary Of Analysis: All real estate transactions in the neighborhood of the facility for twenty-four months prior to and subsequent to March 8, 1977 were collected. In total fifteen sales were collected and analyzed. After thoroughly analyzing the sales in the area prior to March 8, 1977, this appraiser found the area to be somewhat active in real estate sales. The Trotwood area has declined in desirability'over the past few years and this is reflected in the sales prices of the homes.Prices in the immediate area were in the$45,000 to$60,000 price range or approximately$22.00 per square foot of living_area depending on the condition and desirability of the property. After March 8,1977,this appraiser could find no significant change in the home sales or prices obtained. The market appeared to be stable and I was unable to find any depreciation in value due to the "Group Home" being located in the area. The homes in the area are now selling in the$55,000 to$67,500 price range:These prices vary as to size, condition and desirability of each individual property.The actual sales price paid is comparable to prices paid for other similar properties in the Trotwood area outside the subject neighborhood. The results of the study showed that there was no significant difference between average time on the market before and after the location of the group home in the neighborhood.There was also found to be no significant difference between sales price as a percentage of list price before and after the location of the "Group Home." Except for the past year which saw the tight money market and extremely high interest rates, the • market in the area has been relatively active.As mentioned previously, the homes in the Trotwood area have not appreciated in value in relation to other sections of the Dayton area. However, the homes are selling at realistic prices as evidenced by the sales collected in this study. 10 /� . . . . .. J` i ,(1 / . i 11 I I A, * 10E7.x.. .: .i-g-- ' � ► _ Mimeo co+ a j • 4. `• r 1 L .-�I li, � •r •" \..): . u,TYTld.f f .,(HiArirr I f • ' J I R "— ' . •4/411.4/ /Adje.)i 4 1 I 1.1 _I. [F r■•. >,�air.;•, `A¢� , /• . is. i iner dun.���wv nf. -see - ( ,j .. ,. H A R R 1 5. Q N . ... .... . j / . 45416 'I SCHOOL ' .... ,.,,, I j . , ,:, MIMED ...... . • ril• 1 F IL:;..7. /1 . ' i t ra.00 HOHLL a_ ri , .:.-All _ rig .- - A. pii7.f • J al' ,.: .. )i 1.1 1 ..y..4 --.. • • t • I���L - 1_ �� - c • SYorrlaa : _ir' s,, Ji-- i . , 111:1,...k ;.,..... . ..., . i il .i':' . r. illimi • 1 r ... \ , . ` 4 ---., _ E: ii..,..... 3.11114.1. =, ..=. —.1 . . ____Apilir". ........ ; 1. : , ".. 1.1111.111. 7.,.......-101 . ......—.-- -)•-'s . ,,,,!"`....4,..... . • e, —. . 1‘..—.. /Tip '..:ram• t e a. ttM }} ®1 ''j7�r,i '1�t�y tr%4�ii ��� ,. 11 • ADDRESS: 205 Greenhill Road 1 ' jj ' tkL' Harrison Township F 1 ` Dayton, Ohio 45404 ` ,r , { OWNER: The Resident Home Association '., for the Mentally Retarded * of Greater Dayton, Inc. ? r � }g �",• 4 2 ` ,.�• I i 'lid '=•. .^, •... �, ._ 1,- .,�`.. ;-ri ¢, DATE OF LOCATION: June 7, 1976 �—►-�=®®finimmin _____ .•: NUMBER OF RESIDENTS: 8 - _. . ;.:: !• -= :,_ - , . . NUMBER OF STAFF: 3 Full-time . 1 Part-time Summary Of Analysis: All real estate transactions in the neighborhood of the facility for twenty-four months prior;to and subsequent to June 7, 1976 were collected and analyzed. In total, fifteen transactions were collected and • analyzed. This appraiser analyzed the sales in the area prior to June 7,1976 and found the area to be very active for real estate sales. Prices in the neighborhood were.in.the$46,000 to$55,000 price or approximately$23.00 per square foot. The subject property is located in a nice• middle income neighborhood in Harrison Township. The homes have been well maintained throughout the area. The homes in the area are now selling.from$70,000 to$90,000.These prices vary-as to size,condition and desirability of each individual property.The actual sales price is comparable to prices paid for properties in similar neighborhoods: The results of the Study showed that there was no significant difference between average time on the market before and after the location of the group home in the neighborhood.There was also found to be no significant difference between sales price as a percentage of list price before and after the location of the "Group.Home.'" Except for the past year which saw the tight money market and extremely high interest rates, the market in the area has been active.The prices paid for the homes reflect the desirability of the area in the purchasers' eyes. , 12 / • ' 1 . • . . • . _ ) • . • .- .- \\] • I.' 1 • ,i';• / ...f. / :'... ..A . • i . / .1 ./ ) /i. ri...., c.,„:,,,,, . . ! a .. • ',.: .., , min.co.- , •. , 11 • -," . I ezi;.. a .; ' i.Ta 0 .... .._ • 1 i gi J 1E '1____.. -, . •-... , 7.2.4 .,. \...,i ' 1 u-r-1/12lIAL I .1 i. • - 4‘; .3 _., ., r --.. .. I I 's ' i il / /21 -.1 TU./1w 1. , I /.' ' 7-7* 4 .. ...ar, . .' . • r I . i IV . • ' .4,. As. ., . ._ - .\. a ip .ei••:- ., J • , . ... . ..... .•• 1 i . ,,•.) .i.• pr .... 1 • 4 IV OS: A. • 4 I, . I • 1 1 1 ••••I • 1 .. .. .... camel as*. •. • f. I , 11 HARR1 .$ QN -......I. .1.4,,.s.,/,4 ... tin rm.Lamorr•An II 'ff.tt.. . 0:4 i ... ; ................ L.. .. • .337,..c•••:•• •e.r, --,1.,•• 4..,•• - dt. im c . . . 1 ., .......re.#' ':.1:4!a•• 1111.1!"*Ilk .• 4541141 , weaocmodiut -,. ;.:4.17/ I.Frlyi.mm...4 , ..••,../4.: -..• • Z ,I4.4,raf....- . 1 Cs........:VAIN 'f". 4.*..,:Z•• • • .,1 -141 ._ -- • • N; . . •......,r, 1 . . j. 1-1 - : .• Eiwiriar. Lill I P., n / ....tux...2c 774 • • • 1.1"." -. - wisp.local ,, V-714---- "..Wiillri 4 .. il pri j • t, . / . •133-rrmIllemmt Z A 1; ____, -I - . k.::. L •••• . . •1 AIE ill ill V--—.? g 1 Z . :•-. 104.;,., .. . /-.‘,... 1.. .... 1,41•!•••• '1/i*I=ILI 1 \ 1.1177. • .13 •X/ ....• , "ilk/. : .'S ttatt• • I c • ././"1I. .r. . LI . le „.. j, ,..i. ir . • ...- "61Arr-- . .. .:• -ritr. m..1;.,[0 i .,• .. g•—it. . • L.7; 'i , • ' . r— , . • If j1111.Dil . 1 L .'4, '''-;i`—. . . a Ft 14613•••• .r 11 ., • . ./ i • . Ge•Ill•.\4 i..... . :':clia•fftr‘ 'nr.. r.... . ; ''. I• I i annurpArl.TIMIII 1.1 1 / •-. .. •... .. ..,/ . • , ...... t:7_ : •I Fir . ... .N. i k., .... - 4 ie.' 441 'IMiiii: —=•. mom summi 1 -J ' % 11.111.1kk"tl : 171-7--- -'s ".. •lami.:.=‘,.. - . 1 L .,..,Z,N.a to L=.-k i-,1 •. . . ,. 11,111111•1 I w c•-. • •• : • Alt II.7. 1 • ria"---1 .c.,1'.. Jr i • tome•ATI 11..... 1.: II -31=Elle.. 1.*".-.. r ..•.IIIII• A•iik' 1 I V 1,•,... , • i''''',CISIEFtt .. ..—. ir131147:L--"J. =f l.r 49 _ — - wilt:air•..S.4 4 4 7... :1 *14...4;PAK 1 45406 r. Maul* ( • 4r-c) • - I- • -•- f kifty16.,M;a0:iM;(417we.:1) 9 iti.i..px..w.:414 obgorm. lia...11. .. )-., • i 4 irl, • 13 )- 's 1 . 1 • • ADDRESS: 216 Woodbury Road • , :� .T Harrison Township .+�' Dayton, Ohio 45415a:`l ' '` • `; ; ' • • 04OWNER: The Resident Home Association _,F' -. ' '' — • for the Mentally Retardedr�r "� � r 'of Greater Dayton, Inc. DATE OF LOCATION: October 10, 1978 �Y v NUMBER OF RESIDENTS: 851.• _; .� ,F - • NUMBER STAFF: 3 Full-time • �•/L��1TY^.�''v�yL�, ! . ...�'s^["` 1 Part-time • • _t• �•"C1:4. r--•ary rc-a4,4tA ,•;f`._$,sE X. • =L.==�i��. .. ., .::. ..t.;r�-' •.l.•'-.i.;�:��.._`yam •L. .._ ...�.. ..��. . ... tip, : — : •.••- T' -vw- � w...a,�C_!� - ..�. �� _. •.-..�:._... .. .irr:�l"�i..:.'.•tl�'•r.�4•A�:r`!e+�.r • Summary Of Analysis: All real estate transactions in the neighborhood of the facility for twenty-four months prior to and subsequent to October 10, 1978 were collected and analyzed. In total thirteen sales were reviewed. After thoroughly analyzing the sales in the area prior to October 10,1978,this appraiser found the area to be active for real estate sales. Prices in the immediate area were in the$65,000 to$90,000 price range or approximately $36.00 per square foot depending on condition. After October 10, 1978, this appraiser could find no significant change in the home sales or prices obtained.There was still•an active market and I was unable to find any depreciation in value due to the "Group Home" being located in the area. - There was a great amount of concern in the neighborhood the first few months with neighborhood meetings trying to block the "Group•Home." Fortunately the neighbors did not panic and place their homes on the market. After the original scare was over the "Group Home" was evidently accepted and appears to fit in the neighborhood in an acceptable manner. The homes in the area are now selling from$75.000 to$110,000 indicating a normal appreciation in the market. These prices vary as to size, condition and desirability of each individual property. The actual sales price was found to be comparable to prices paid for properties in similar neighborhoods. The subject property is well maintained and is very compatible with the other housing in the neighborhood. There is no evidence from the exterior that the house is occupied by other than a single family resident. The results of the study showed that there was no significant difference between average time on the market before and after the location of the group home in the neighborhood.There was also found to be no significant difference between sales price as a percentage of list price before and after the location of the "Group Home." Except for the past year which saw the tight money market and extremely high interest rates, the market in the area has been active.The prices paid for the homes reflect the desirability of the area in the purchasers' eyes. 14 0! .c-b . �` VII . -4----"---)..„ __,--------------,-___ ,,........ ., .i 4..i.i VI ..eI cm00s :. . ' F I A! , �- , •,. : / _ . _. :, , . ' V : LEi L. • wilt tf) r- i • -- . ...-". Do., IL -11 . _______§.-••...,,,,A0..0. ,,,,..,,,, i 4: A*,... .11 .Jili : :1 I . . / i I i 1 .11 ; I 1 • ---..,. I 0 I - . ) 1. • ---- 1 L. . Lis 11 -- IT . 11 1 r ........:. _ < 1 1 anlr f �j ADDRESS: 905 Kenbrook Drive . Vandalia, Ohio :` '� Alt. OWNER: The Resident Home Association for the Mentally Retarded / • a^ of Greater Dayton, Inc: • r • DATE OF LOCATION: Jul 28,.1980 Y • NUMBER OF RESIDENTS: 8 �' -°~ `-x NUMBER OF STAFF: 3 Full-time • � z`��`; •. --- 7:� ;=; ram' , 1 Part-time __ • ham �7�"_�� a?i,�,.c....y.a}/;'�ir�.rti Summary of Analysis:' All real estate transactions in the neighborhood of the facility for twenty:four months prior to July 28, 1980 and since that date were collected. In total,eleven transactions were collected and analyzed. After thoroughly analyzing the sales in the area prior to July 28,1980,this appraiser found the area to be active for real estate sales. Prices in the immediate area were in the $65,000 to$90,000 price rangeor approximately"$33.00per square foot.The subject is located in a very nice middle income development in Vandalia, Ohio which has been.well maintained and a pride of ownership exists. Subsequent to July 28, 1980, this appraiser was unable to find any homes by the subject which were placed on the market.Apparently,the"Group Home"adjusted to the neighborhood and there was no fear by the nearby homes.The subject is well maintained and blends well with the other existing homes in the area. The homes in the area are now selling at$65,000 to$90,000.These prices vary as to size,condition and desirability of each individual property.The actual sales price is comparable to prices paid for properties in similar neighborhoods. The results of the study showed that there was no significant difference between average time on the market before and after the location of the group home in the neighborhood.There was also found to be no significant difference between sales price as a percentage of list price before and after the location of the "Group Home." Except for the past year which saw the tight money market and extremely high interest rates, the market in the area has been active.The prices paid for the homes reflect the desirability of the area in the purchasers' eyes. • 16 • -5'•-,...9 1.... • , • fe• " • • ..': ,..,4:1:: ief'...",. • 1,-446iil,yi-Ar.,,. . T4'..1/•;•=t it-7i.-,c•/::,,:. )IA0....-4;/0•,"_,.....•;.1•.• ..'J./....••.<• ..i,'": .- '•;I'•.''• •..,.r ••:,:4. 1 ,,,, • . • -, f •,..'"f; •• •••` -•••••:17•••• ••.,..•IPF.' •4 • ••'-'"-I. I2•,":.....•''t r• 1 l'•4,,-;•1.41..- ,, " 1,..! .s4;,...,,.,. '0,1! .'.• ••••,/,'...At atf!,,,, `,...j.. e-_ ,r..,. ,_ ,.„,, ...........„:„...„.„:„),„.... :,..„......417,",,•• ,•-:!•'VI'. '•it'r:.•/...-•;;f1'.'• . :4;,,I.`4t.' 2 .•:... ..4.°:ej<1.::'• -.14.14.iv•1 .;...?..::( • •,:!ir' . .1;.,r IIZ• . . . • :,..V4:i.,6,-;.. .?::::!•......1-'? ''''. .`:":".7.7t• •: ..•41;•,• ..ig...'s-4,2::::-',r;:,g.fT",:'N,Ig 7/.1 '''IPS;-..-/ .'i 1. :...:-.:: . 4 .. .,:.: ....-,'•; '. ••••' . •-; ,..A.,...,.. ••.:A„.,..t.rop:,;,....,...4,5ic‘ ".4 .. • .•.i•%....., ....4 .... ••• .•. .. . ..s. . ..-• • -.' fl•-•;,'!A;T.N.;=!'r..-.5,...,..1::',47.E.:I.,•-",.FY4 •,•:.. ":-' . -T-,:$0,, -.,„ ,..,:.• .,r.. ;•. .. .:' - ..... • • '...-',••.•i•• . - '"'-' - ••.-441.'',..-:'.1t,rti..n. ‘'• '..-.., -,41-$:... ...... -...,,, ,1'.}.4".04. .i.4.:.v••.,„"..:....,•••;,...; "•t ",;•:::.• ,- .,i..•.44.; , „i4,..,_ .•••••..-e,-:.„: '., .,„w, ''''"rp.::::::;.iii...:1,:::.':,.-"•!.,:,,....'i ?,-.;.",.,.:•-. ;41:..!'•it...7•1'.i..%-..;.-..,"'-.(4:g. . .,:.?.•41,.;..,',7"."... ...e.314,.•..•,..:„.y.....i',4,;:...L.'..::::••••••5.;%-."14:-,.. .,.••;---77i,..,i4::-.,:f ti,,,,,...-::.77...b.::::,,,::::....;....-.01,.:-.e..: i:i...-.-;:-:;,..,7...,. .."i. . ".'...,: '..-.,..-",';,;,,. •:. . .. •...... . - P. •yl•!, k!':';. ,1,-,-._ • \.. 1-,rrr,•.:.--'''.1• '-,:- ;:•' - .•,.4,. .-_,.....•....-i ',.' •-a° .. ': - : •'-....f/tfi'i.;:Nve„„,,.. .•„..,,,,...i,,./27,..„••rw..•2' e,."I:A.,?....r...!'.:7.4. ,.,.,,,. .. .,,.,!-.,. 'P'.--,.. • •-.,4.,-_,-%,!p:,:....;-..,...-....7.. .,-'. ::...."... .5.: .i ". .4.. •'.1,-,',..,..r - .,.•-•!-f,!..:.,....!'?;,.t.-77r,..., -,,-.-.• ,- -..,:, ,,,-.1..,. ,...,e,.r. :,•.: ,.... ,.•. • -,.,,...•,- ..-,••••••• • -•rt• ..* ••••..'.......' "::c.\;'.?1,.-t•''.':f...-'..-•'••••••..'i.e.'''.:---,..-.....':- ..-.;..-...-...••.:-?-.'• 41.61 ,ei--.,..,s.v.,if., •,77:.;,-.:-#. .wi,•:•::,',. •.' -;f.'..'.' 6;: •i''.4-1V.;PIVII.. fii• . ''''..' ...'•)?-.'1-;';7. • :!••.::•.••••:::•:.4ii.s.:';4?-,,•:. .!..;,.. ..?:-...:-..2.,P.'f,',;',...•..,iii•Oht."•livoi,,v/.../.•; ..,-.. : • .„.,••%;i:..,•;• ,.. :•.:t.....,.•.•••'...; .1;:',.!..11;,,,,..,......,•.-:',"':;•.,;•.1,:.:i.';'',71,•• .:A.1".'g±!;;.,••••••;k: **`:••1 ..::).:,. ...';''..:-r.:*:.-••‘'-'7.;-ii?...',"-:••:.:...".:ii.t4-_,-- ; --'' ..• .• • ' •_ ::.:t.:•"..t7.,,, ,,•,:'.,•,...,:::';:.,..,,"••11--,f:f4W.44';'''!",;-: '....-" •••.•..-.'.; Njfe...-;.. ....--... '!`.'-•*,11::':.4.7i ..e-tit,r,.;-;•1,:-.74:-(,,j'i-•?6 : . - •,,• •••,..'"rl!'.f.'4•"°•"••:.7:1:;.-,,"•I',1.N-...T.-,-/.F--..,,..„ : -:,..., .,1 :?•t. •'4.*:,.. -, .:•;.:"i•-•'.1.=.?,---..--;,y;,..i.-.„,)- ,... • :1-,A,s,•••,,,,,.••,-,...7.:••....v.-;.......4,4,1,,,-,...4...4.4-.-F.;:s..,.... .; - • .• • ..,,,,,,y ,,. -.•. ....., pp, ......,x41„..„..,,,.,..,,.. , . -.• -:,,,'•;,.,:.,.:.•,::-4.y,,I.::.Y.,•,..:,,.:.1-2.;;.-.42•,:k.:.,...., .ft.'-f-,;•-At,:r1;''...... .'..- :.',.;.'... •.4..... 111....Z.4' ,;..;---., -7 ,,,,,-1,1:.,•,..., ..-..::i., ', ...4'.' '. ;•-•,-.4:.--.'..--.4.-I.::-..Ji.ki,-4,7:...;..•,.‘>?-se - - ,- '•':-"'.--,...i.''''..-.7.-'17-4.-!.-- ' -..''..., ....•.-.,........-:,........,,;.... " .-%-t,•,.-:•,-.:zat•.---, •'-',..••• .•- f" •• :"..• *.1.;,--..:,. .11...,1-..,,..-,,-./..z;..-, ••.-.7"-..-. 1".-4.... •', - , ,‘'''N...••:;•".""1-'.•::::::11‘;'"" . -'•,-'-!•'.',..:".74"-?•••j.",'-k • ..-'...4. ‘; •-• •,,!....,', --"-.*-7,..4:1.-•4.•:•Z:5,-,.. - ,dir •=1"...474`.4*.'":*-'• N ,,A, pr. ,:r ccv-•.i--.4?-.:.-.,..,,/,-.P.'•.. jet', • - •t: :.........,;•:.a,,,,-....-Pi,":„.....:...;f•r;,;ZE.4„.7-4,-, -. ,.: . • :::, ..41. ..."7'.....,....,,4, "r•444 <,.... ..,...„.".• ,... .. ..,,....;sg...„;,,...4„..4.7,..,.....4:•,...1•...•_..,.....,.....,,,..,,,,...0.;?.,:. •,........ ,...„.tt:.,,.•=?:.1.,,..,.:.;17.4k,c.:;•,.7z,..„,— . ,..47;.;............-;;If.e.:45.. ,... : . •......,..i,•......:• ,,. ....„,... . .. . . . .. "......".....;1.•,,,,:-;!...1r..,••••-z-‘-,,,r,-.:t. .• I • .... • , - Air.k,... .: ..,...k.„. :: • .',.......:. -''......,A , t-ii•;.-,Dits.-••I''-":1.• I -, • "'7,:',1;-1-:%, !A- • . • ,--....;_„. "•.3 •7 4.',..-.,,-• 5- ., . -. ' -• ' ";,,t.‘''- - ".•.?"--...,• • :-,* ----.*•777, / - , .k.i.!7•••••:•,..'..•••44: .,,„AP, -.,,:,• . 44. •-•••. - ?...1 '.'',.iII:-.•!-."•4:. • •. . , •..7.,...oz•.- - ..',. :''', ,.:-'.....4744i...... • ,-.- ... . • :,• .,_ . . •• nr..tz "- •;- . • •;„,.. ..g',..ii.•.....';'''' .•:•••.1 ..' • .•• - •,• .• .•• .,...t. " •• .. • ,......-44, . •fr.';..?...^,!$: i,.: .,...ii•A;i:i . .4-k.:: --•••*. -- .i.-••;.%-/--5-'-,*1 .'' . ' " - .1..ti•••_=7- ..;...z...-•nl.X If- • .,.A1,,.,-. .-...4.‘ . -• ., ;--•si:-.4';', ,i,f.::, ....,..: : . ;•.;,i;.. -*•.,. .. ,4*.,;..,- .1f' .•••. ••••'.r. . ' -.%•"'„,' Y-."• ::..;' • ;,:.,...g•• .%-.(t..lf'es'A...fi....,. ;"... '• - ''' ..'",.;.•:. ' ' s .1;-.=•'•5.• .,r,,, ....,.,„„,,..::,,,....,,,,,..,... .. •,;T: ---4..t.-,4,,...• •-•,..•).. • .• ri`. : $7,,,. .i... ...... ... '''..-i' ''-t. ',t"::,?", ..- '. •: ..':.:: .. *i.,,A. I•lial:..... .. •.*'..! 4-r•'''' i, ....41, -""0 .--,-- '." ilti,..;;d: •.. ?"':. -,,--•Iee.....,;.;.; .;7.;.,.i 4.:,...c.,.., .,.....(;!..,;,....',.'.4:,..;;.-...,, „:•-•..1;: .,''.i'C'.-;:7feil•,•-• . -, • _,,, ,. ..... . *: ''...:••zil•...'•'• ".:::....;:„,..";114,' ; 4 I T.. ••.,.:••--...... . ,0.4-z•v•=-T.47:::-',.'::':.-.1.„,...ii,....::•••..;,..........i•••' „.,41.'').: ..-:-.,-•••,:•;10:'fi.••••,-;•.:.,',.,;.•-,•-. •-•.:4-,-,,,,,. ...4-.. '''...1-...":.• ••• .....,•,./..4-.... •-!.'..;;....t.S.,,,,,4100v,..-. ..• --.-- .'41'''...,;•.; .,i7 t . •-- -...---- '..-'-sr', 10.4.7i t..,...74:-:,-. ••. i•-....:.-f-- ....: ‘L•.,..t'.'-'1.?* I . -. ',.-• 4.,?..':'-','....-.•,..-..',1...,......, ,Jti• 'A-.", ,:' '''i..• ••••''-.la -,. '.! :r.,,riPi.A.Noilr••p-„,!. .,..„.;,-• ..,. •.: • *••••;,.....i,..„, ,,,:„.,.„,•:, 4,......:,.„.:,.... ...-...:i,;.•,. , .1....w,„.7'`,..,..;=,,,..„.:.,,.„....,....,,:,...,,. .:. ...7....,.......i,„?'::-...,:: •....,..,:-..•«,,.Q., '',.•:-** .,--:-....,-,.-- ,..A.-1>;" • •.:11,P.-' ., 7,-....' :'•'•,.....;f:,•'--,..-:•-.•''.e,:;•-•,,:-';'•- i't'C'' 1,.:•••-(f*:,:` •- .77,..': :-- ','Pl'..;-/rr'''''''*•:?''',-;- '-'1.,'::-..-..nr.''' .`:;•-rr•':•'-',.; -4.7 ': 1 tr,,?... -, raW.V,t, '':-f',,',./..',..'-t.•1,..•.'::.•.':;!..% •- •,!•-•!,• ;, ' I, ! ---'-•-•:,u'r"--.4%;•',..,",..‘:.?' ;•-r.-4'''''.,'..,:',-•••'.5:SI•-•:;..•4,;:':.•••i tii. •.•••••'•:* • ,-,••.•::4Z:.,•••••,;'•'‘•V,I,,:r• ••••••••• ••." ,-14.'-,'•.I•--,,••. ;.,7'.44; •- ; I• ••••••;••''.;••••••;,. :,•'.I.;,:•.sr..'.-.••.:••'•-'•;-::... :f4•3i,,,4•:Y;•I;a•ili:•••,••:•=7••:-••I.r.-)••••••••••:.•i.''•••••• ''.:.•••.:'1,•••I'•,•'••.•.••••••..'r.,•.:I'•;::,•••-•••••••,21•"•'•••••••••.:.';-:••/I-.i•-•,1.1:,:;;;•••'1':•••••;• ;* •-••••;•"•}".: . . • . . '."... ':...-.iia'-7: - '*--;'-.:.::-:-.::4"7.•'.,.f:F.•-•.5;,z-'.1":;-'•':Pi:ae.';:..P..!. .."40.c..,..''.. ' ,,,,,,,„..., ..,.:4,,,,---,,....;:54?--).,-..,..i.,,,-•::?......!;;:;..,:;:::,4.1.-..•.2.•-•.--,c-',..-„. \ .. A.,‘', .i.-.,4,,:.„•:•- •:,. .,..._,,,,..--,,,..•:::,;..-,.....,;•,......,...:..,.4_ic.:4....::,..,j,..100...,...., . • . •k,-..,......,....„;•,...-.4+-,--.,;.-• -,•••---,-.....,.,,,..,....-,..,.....:.:•,. .,,. 2..-,•••..-..,,,,..-.-.-i...:.•-----••7"=•-." .. -';• --•' . r,' :!,•'',-••• . ''fir!.V.r!r?••r r sr-1 4(4 ;:•1' ' '*".4-4;:%;1;i:''';' •:7:'r'''...474. : -fr" '",4;4;‘, t:;•:, ••••',.-.• .: -. i ,..1,.,••.•:...t.t.,t;. --,:•'' • • . -..'.',..•:c.?,;';',,, ..•• •.;.:,.• .:*.b... i •,.. "..:.:;2•''',,-,...:-.'.-..';"?......:' t---;!.•.,41 -i .• , •„';,..!:;......i..-,;;Y•fr.''•,...::'''".-_.4.1.11`"" -•• ; • .0.;\''''.1;'.1- '':-.. ..,..L;ri, '-„,• , :,..----4,,,:4, f,ti:•:::A:14.;'•:-. ..rZ". . ,,,,:4;..:-•,t, •%:-.`;: ;,.14i!,ft-• : 11'z-:":4..-.-.i"r•„--"..,..4.4 ,.." . • I..., ., ..!.- ,•'-'••••,,,,,.•' „"•• ; " ' . • . , lirjoh• • . . . . . • . _ . EX. IT 13 ( 8 Pages ). . ' • T �) Summary ( 8/80 ) The Effect of Community Residences _For The Mentally Retarded On Real-Estate ' 'Values. In.The Neighborhoods In 'Which They Are Located ' . • • . Martin S,'. Lindauer, Pauline Tung, and Frank O'Donnell • State University of New York, College at- Brockport, Brockport., N. Y. 14420 . • The effect of community residences for the mentally retarded on seven ' neighborhoods in a medium-sized northeastern city and three adjoining towns was. . . investigated for the period.. 1967-1980. Their impact was measured in terms of - real-estate values. ' These were specificied by (1).' the prices of tee homes sold, . and (2) the number of sales. Sales records from the centralized multiple-listing. -files of the real-estate board were surveyed for adjacent streets and blocks for the two years preceding. and 'the two years following the establishment of the ' ' community residences. Two control neighborhoods, comparable with two of the community residence neighborhoods., were included in the sample, •as were homes put-up for sale and then withdrawn from the market. County sales figures were also available. The average (' mean ) price of the 90 homes sold in the seven neighborhoods rose 9% one year after the community residences were established. This compares F:2 —L favorably with county sales figures which show ( depending upon the year -and- :)location ) a S-1.0o increase. Sales for homes on the affected streets only -- t'u Co wher .the in act of the, community residences would be most directly felt -- �draiically rose 28% over the four-year period. This upward trend was found in /o 4:8 cv allj but one of the neighborhoods. : In the two community residence neighborhoods' Co v — • ti Ill foj which control neighborhood comparisons were possible, the. "after" sales ' `-. Z5 p vices were nearly identical in both sets of data ( the difference was .less Q - than $600 ) ; and in' one set of comparisons, the increase in the community ' . residence neighborhood sales prices, compared to its control neighborhood, was 33%.72 .141 \ 1 Commune t y residence p. 2 - .;,.A Thus, the value of the homes sold in the community residence neighborhoods I rose; and depdnding upon the type of analysis used, the increase ranged between 9% ( the high end of -the norm• for city and environs ) to 33%. This does not necessarily mean that community residences increased the value of- the neighbor- • • • . ; hood home$, since some. ( but not all ) of this increase is probably accounted , , for by inflation. Price rises would have. occurred in any event, without the - ; presence of a community residence in 'the neighborhood. What the data do clearly . r demonstrate is that community residences do not decrease the property values of ' '. the homes in the neighborhoods in which they are located. There does appear to be a negative effect of community residences on real •• . estate-values.',. •as measured by the number of-homes sold. A "selling wave" appeared just before the -community residences were established. - Thus, 39% of all sales Fift. 3 , took place one year before the community residences were established ( compared • .- to 21% the year after ). Further, of the former group, nearly a third ( 31% ) • occurred three months prior to the community residences' establishment ( compared . to only 14% of the sales taking place three months after the residences were establish Homes do get sold, however, without any special difficulty. Of the 53 homes put- ' up for sale and then withdrawn from the market, about the same number are found . 'throughout the time periods examined. Further, the prices obtained during the F . 1 most. active period of sales were not negatively affected,,,They- showed the same 1.1n Q' year !increase ( 9% ) over the prices of the previous/as generally found. Further, Ithe increased selling trend was marked in only three of the seven ncighborhoods. ��q- - Fear of decreased home values following the establishment of community <<�—Qs�a^ i residence .homes for the mentally. retarded -- although unfounded -- does lead to Some "panic" selling ( but without depressing selling prices or the ease with Which homes can be -sold ) . Thus, the crucial time to inform, reassure, and provide support for neighborhoods in which a community home is to be located should reach a peak about three months before. the residences are occupied. . _ • • • • • • $ 30,000 Streets and Blocks Combined • U %. cn cu.. 25,000 w c co a) 2 . 20,000 • i2 -1 +11 +2 . Years Before (—) and After (+) Residences . Established FIGURE 4. Mean sales price of homes sold + two years before and after establishment of community_ • residences in seven neighborhoods (1968-1980). 1 .' . : • • :.r . . . • • • $30,000— p Before (N = 50) (± 2 years) 29,000— r .. ® After (N =40) 28,000— -tee 0 '.!� 26,000— �N �. .3 F..l7+ /:,,,T ' .tykes • a� ;;;� -,:ea • • t E '6441 rf rr 23,000-- >.te x . f ' .g_ � .# . • "l •`. y , r A'=,--,, __ T 0 .": pa street • block total Location . • . FIGURE 2. Mean sales price of homes sold in • community residence neighborhoods . • • • • • Target D.(14 sales) $30,000— P Control D (40 sales) • Target DP (18 sales) -® Control DP.(18 sales) • / a) ' ,U a' 25,000— e' • cn a.) • 2 • • • 20,000— • Before After • Time Periods (± 2 years) • FIGURE 6. Mean sales price of homes sold in two • community residence and control neighborhoods. • • • , • • _ Streets and Blocks Combined • • • 40— (31,0 sold within 3 months) • 35— I - 25— cn ""c5 (1470 sold within 3 months) ••• ct 20— • 15— , _ • • 10— • —2 —1 • +1 +2 Years Before (--) and After (+) - • Residences Established FIGURE 3. Total number of homes sold ±. two • • H years before and after establishment • of community residences in seven • - neighborhoods (1968-1980). • • 1, • . 9 - ® Before (N = 50) ( + 2 years) . • p After (N = 40) 8_ - • . u7 a.) - E 0 _ ' 6-- o �+4 +v.i cn [1:::.'-'..:.' •••.'.:A.-,`.1 0 4- T ".. .7. '+r:' 4 o of homes --.,',.1 =�.�. .,..-1- put up for sale cU�_ 2-� •, . • and withdrawn '!"; - at BeTore and After periods. r 1 j'. k Z I•.•i(:/. street - block total (N = 158) (N = 500) (N = 658) Location FIGURE 1. Percentage of homes sold in community residence neighborhoods. 1 • • • • 15 • a .a Control D (40 sales) E o c 0 0 ri o ■ ' \ • Target D (14 sales) • o to (�• �\ - ca \ • CIO (J) • • � � 5— • `� Target DP (18 sales) ti Control DP (18 sales) • Before • After ' • Time Periods ( ± 2 years) • • FIGURE 5. Percentage of homes sold in two community residence • and control neighborhoods. ' • • • CITY OF Fi7:.N-v``;:I 1 p D FEB 2 41988 BUILDING/ZONING DEPT. EXHIBIT #16 - There is significant support for this project at this location as is indicated by the 53 signatures on the following pages . N CRY d OF REV • ( En NOV 24 LW •. 'FINANCE DEFT. TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: We the'undersigned, who live in the vicinity of 'N.B. 19th. Street ' between Union and Shelton Avenues N_E_ , Renton, support the place- ment of a Good Shepherd Group Home- for the developmentally disabled adults at this location. We also support the Block Grant for off- site improvements approved by the city council. , Signature, Address . , 43-.- / '1'4444,2de4 ,Ii-lje-a-/---4,2P-P 0.-.4„.i_O-E .-1-1_Efr . .. (''' '`' . _00gee."'"- ./.81Z7-Le' l7a-'' t‘l_,7‘ .. -_ : - - Al....s6144 044#1.3b.-(hiptgsor";-,_a)14--_ ____ f 91 73;2 41/4,. /d('_,,IMAAr / P7 4-1914/4) _672Td-/U-JE.,--24i1Geoti -- - "vY _. _ G /7 /7 (,(ilk_. . j , u_ -1 imi-g' `1---== Pui-+Vr t s I4 t�-r of ramie ► 6k.-,. - __ ,...E.__si 14-itlf:`-. ..k.ir---41-0:1;0 /IV- Ski/../(31-fd 44(44. L./..0 .sue 3 f t.1 e 1 v. kuv - ''° 2 4.ide 1l° 21e_t lz 6 ! „,gi ,. le/03 C 7v 4LrJ ' - __.A9z,, cA- ,r - - 1__�'_N/L'_•- .s�Lr .. -,;.,7=7-- aare-•G �[/' );/. / . ,, , , ��. ' -lam /1 • ---- T• `T j Rzik- x--? I r, � !y� �z. G� U ,.21',1,14T L(J j;c041.1.a T2 /L L':�, 1 rrLa 4 r da.44,,,„}/1_,:p..-e_ ii /0 0 A i c- /9 q-i- 17-,41-----er7c-' tz)et-, ?24- ' - C:Dri- Aas iuf /P ad-ifoo Wac,..Ufq, Ai.4.zr /i,.. -1 l�-- �, ' / t�6 _ ff, e.-7/,..ff7—....,— iad /, ' /z — _. �,z7 t. . d� - TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: We the undersigned, who live in the vicinity of N.E. 19th Street between Union and Shelton Avenues N.E. , Rent.on., support the place- ment of 'a Good Shepherd Group Home, for, the ,developmentally disabled adults at this' location. We also support the Block Grant for off- site improvements approved by the city council. . Signature Address Qz &k41d — -Z7Of L�1 r G ' - k, 6. t ird Sa, / /V,W4f � %2 LlG_�_'z! L�G /ate- ---,---- t-70 9 4....6.:(z7.44,.., r9z...4.?' A-,45- 12tie.V..)-4. i Lff° - lie /2 (t_ k /61,t gi 9/('7'7?)127: Vt7L_if,i/t,4 Wz,- )?16rig- c/t12 Qki - ` L'z I1_ L?11, gt.„4-&__ 0?1,31-6 ,, 2:14 grtiiiitaL Vie...4 ile zi'-'- " - - 92).60 _ _ Rom_ I] _\ALI-1110-1- ..) U L , 1J. 1i_,,t v,_LrL ► La , s 1\- /7/2 7)( `11-c e'•_-&L 6 74,')` 2L) - -� ' L G3--� -ft_AC _ e411/2v1Lt_ t)5 J& LdLL'-L ' Lj .. .4J4.4) itc7ali a, .c 48O S 1 `.- t k sTNerCan_ lcr2 NUanaG icz earto --- — , C. L o $ -��-s#Fo�l Cr, do.47-61.1144.. 280s , --- ----� ÷ji?- N e.15 . egArii)4, pt/4 ' d ---- - . 'o o 9 is c)t./1 b ---_?__ ._,g 6,_ De- / /o # _ 1� �, -r 9ePa/i\) . ° VNV0J-J V\ s 16 _ �`_ , V��_tn�J _� j'7O& .Lnl`OIL !Yes ii �- -C� �;- ( ` n \n(n, _cicfLy-) eJ-1 1 < 1 3 u r) I 0 r) 0 Lie. I/-)_ce. 936)6 r .E^d iii- GkcIsi)..._ u 4105 t.)-E. t-tr, -. - . ct ti�S b TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: We the undersigned, who live in the vicinity of N.E. 19th Street between Union and Shelton Avenues N.E. , Renton, support the"place- ment of a Good' Shepherd Group Home for the developmentally disabled adults at this location. We also support, the Block Grant for off- site improvements approved by, the city council. Signature Address `49;4d-c4AL 2/I .127-1%Sr ,g id7-41 clog OliZ-/9P4V- 91.6 4/&e) 3 /() _ 76/1‘‘ _d/144Pfee;vQarAgAfr .14(.4:4'.. rf-A --111 } _7!re4/12X) '44=7,14-e-e9 IqD-7 " „. f - /11111.11"11-4AC "•• /90( Vv),,k(ni ari) c • 2149N ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: DATE CIRCULATED: , MARCH 10, 1988 COMMENTS DUE: MARCH 18, 1988 EFC - 010 - 88 APPLICATION NO(S). : REZONE: R-010-88, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT: CU-010-88 PROPONENT: GOOD SHEPHERD OF WASHINGrON PROJECT TITLE: GOOD SHEPHERD GROUP HOME BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION TO REZONE APPROXIMATELY 0.85 ACRE OF PROPERTY FROM R-1 TO .G-1 (DOWN ZONING) AND APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW A SIX RESIDENT, SIX BEDROOM GROUP HOME FOR THE DEVELOPMENTALLY DISABLED. LOCATION: LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF N.E. 19th STREET AT THE 3900 BLOCK, BETWEEN UNION AVENUE N.E. AND SHELTON AVENUE N.E. SITE AREA: 0.85 ACRE BUILDING AREA (gross): 2,528 SQ. FT. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health, 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas we have expertise in and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date AdigIIIIIII Form 4 I RENT( k BUILDING & ZONING DEPAL_..MENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 010 - 88 APPLICATION NO(S) : REZONE : R-010-88 , CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT: CU-010-88 PROPONENT : GOOD SHEPHERD OF WASHINGTON PROJECT TITLE : GOOD SHEPHERD GROUP HOME BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION TO REZONE APPROX. 0. 85 ACRE OF PROPERTY FROM R-1 TO G-1 (DOWN ZONING) AND APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW A SIX RESIDENT, SIX BEDROOM GROUP HOME FUR THE DFVELUEMEN'1"ALLY LOCATION LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF N.E . 19th STREET AT THE 3900 DISABLED. BLOCK. BETWEEN UNION AVENUE N.E . AND SHELTON AVENUE N.E. TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : OENGINEERING DIVISION OTRAFFIC ENG . DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : UTILITIES ENG . DIVISION 0 FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT OBUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT OPOLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 .P .M. ON' MA12C:N 1R , 1 9RR REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : OAPPROVED El APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS ONOT APPROVED DATE: SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 , „, :„ . -,• , .. - , - -, : • .„ - , • ',,, , , •, • ,,,..;,724,,,,, ,,,, •;;;.. . -'-7,-,..', ''',;,-..1',7!',).',,,,p,•;, ::--,,iA-riev,,, \--„,- ---` ' . 2:-`1': , , - ' t,i` , , •, _..• - .,,,,.'. ., ',- ,,'• -,'-'''' ( : 1(1' 5.ri ‘,-Y• , ,,. 1,..,,,i,,.;.•. . ,,, _ ,,, ,....,,, ,.4, , • ., ,' . ‘, ;•. ..:,'. e'l•-;0,.,-/C:,,,A,..'1.,,.:LI..‘,'"•4_,,,•. ,_, , ,,49,44/NriAt?„1,),;,,),,;.....' ,-;1:4',47-'-'r---7 ' '' '. .\72;/'-' '' '.,'".' -‘.4, —•".. '',, :: ,.,,.`"` .: ': • -.''''s' 1777'-`,5-4-1'-' '• .-,:•:`,:"4-.'----v ,' 7,P.R",(1,,',. '..:,,:,::'4'.,''A,14/.'2§,l' Z‘I.N.,'.%"Y:,,,' t',,.;.q,•ilq.1,, ' . , , .Mary Lou Harbeck Katherine L. Hawley , . ' Patricia Wallace 3507 N.E. I Ith ' 1717 Union Ave. N.E. ; 4205 N.E. 19th , Renton,'WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 . • Rentqn, WA___910.56__ ----- . . • . . ,' • Good Shepherd of Washingion, Timothy N. Potter . I. Watkins • -. 18940 Marine View Dr. S.W., 1892 Shelton Ave. N.E. 4211 N.E. 19th , Seattle; WA 98166 ‘' - • Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA" 98056 - _ , . . . •Darlene Lang • i Jennifer'L. Potter Ada Jean Hill - 475,1 South 172nd Place .. 1892 Shelton Ave. N.E. . 4100 N.E. 19th Seattle, WA 98166 , • Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA .98056 . . •, : . . . , .• , . • , Howard R. Kienle ' i , Scott L. Surber • Kim Tessin • 732 Melody Lane „ : 3839 N.E. 19th St. 4203 N.E. 19th Enumclaw,'WA 98022 ' • Renton, WA 98056' Renton, WA 98056 • • . • . Mary L. Czaplinski - Annelle J. Abernethy , Floyd Figgins • 1801 Union Ave. N.E. 1609 Shelton Ave. N.E. 4225 N.E. 19th - . Renton, WA 98056 • ' Renton, WA. 98056 • Renton, WA 98056 . . .• - , . • ,Carla Ball ' ' Steve Altrinzer ' . Geraldine A. Cunningham 1800 Union Ave. N.E. • • 1703 Shelton Ave. N.E. 4100 N.E. 17th Renton, WA 98056 ' Renton; WA 98056' Renton, WA 98056 — , Judith W. Sheldon ;' Cindy Altrinzer , Jolene Richmond 1813 Union Ave. N.E. ,, • 1703 Shelton Ave. N.E. • 1709 Whitman Ave.N.E. Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 • Renton, WA 98056 ' • • •, .. . . , Owen K. Hall Shirley F. Peterson . Vicki'Hulses 1732 Union Ave. ' 1808 Union Ave. N.E. ' 1729 Whitman Ave. N.E. Renton, WA 98056 ' Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA ,98056 • • , . . . . , . Tom Czaplinski Jeff Crawford ' " • Doug Richmond : 1801 Union Ave. N.E. 1724 Union Ave. N.E. ., 1709 Whitman Ave. N.E. -Renton, WA 98056 . Renton, WA 98056 - Renton, WA 98056 ,. • ' • . . . , . . . E.Bueno N. L. James • Don Westphall 1907 Vashon Ct. N.E. . • 1724 Union Ave. N.E. , 4109 N.E. 17th Renton, WA 98056 - ' , Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 — • • . . - '1, �'2',1' �' �1. 1 ..l.:l.• Joan Westphall Virgil Hill Lyle K. Coblert 4109 N.E. 17th 4080.N,E. 19th • 4603 N.E. 20th Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Paul C. Wold K. Evans Larry Kraft, 4132 N.E. 17th 1710 Shelton'Ave. N.E. 1911 Union Ave. N.E.' Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Carolyn L. Wold Ronald Hedlin Nancy Kraft 4132 N.E. 17th 1709 Shelton Ave. N.E. 1911 Union Ave. N.E. . Renton, WA ,98056 Renton, WA' 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Anthony A. Heft . Bob E. Abernethy • Shannon Bueno 1712 Whitman Ave. N.E. 1609 Shelton Ave. N.E. 1907 Vashon Ct. N.E. Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Linda S. Helt George Credit Rick Cordiga 1712 Whitman Ave. N.E. 1700 Union Ave. N.E. • 1901 Vashon Ct. N.E. Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 • Steve Walker Karen E. Zerby ' . Joan Cordiga 1913 Vashon Ct. N.E. 1807 Union Ave. N.E. 1901 Vashon Ct. N.E. Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 . Renton, WA 98056 Annette Walker Riena Corznati N.E. Cemper 1913 Vashon Ct. N.E. 1813 Union Ave. N.E. . 3910 N.E. 17th St. Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 ' Renton, WA . 98056 Janene R. Johnson ' Steve Greer 1908 Vashon Ct. N.E. 4205 N.E. 19th Renton, WA 98056. Renton, WA 98056 Stephen H. Johnson Frederick Hill ' 1908 Vashon Ct. N.E. 4100 N.E. 1.9th St. Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 . • Louis E. Borges Carol Hill , . • 4.123 N.E. 19th 4080'N.E. 19th St. ' Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 .. .R .: 4'.', ' 1 t 1. ,.µ•;{' • : tie. 5+ te +'1=%-- • is ' s.�. .l 3f"-- Mary.Lou Harbeck ' Katherine L."•Hawley. - Patricia Wallace - 3507 N.E. "11'th ' - . 1717 Union Ave. N.E.: • ; • 4205 N.E.. 19th, Renton, WA. 98056 . Renton; WA 98056 .• ' Renton, WA 98056 Good Shepherd of Washington Timothy N. Potter L Watkins 18940.Marine View Dr.-S.W., . 1892 Shelton.Ave. N.E. • -4211 N.E. 19th : Seattle, WA 981'66 Renton, WA .98056.• Renton, WA 98056 Darlene Lang Jennifer L. Potter • Ada Jean Hill 4751 South 172nd Place 1892 Shelton Ave: N.E. 4100 N.E. 19th • Seattle, WA .98166 Renton,,WA 98056 ' - Renton, WA 98056 • Howard R. Kienle " Scott L. Surber ' ' Kim Tessin •• , 732 Melody. Lane ' '` ,' -. -3839 N.E.-19th St. ' : " • 4203 N.E. 19th • Enumclaw,.WA 98022 • r', Renton, WA 98056 ' . '. Renton, WA 98056- Mary L. Czaplinski ., Annelle J. Abernethy. Floyd Figgins 1801 Union Ave. N.E. 1609 Shelton Ave: N.E. 4225 N.E. 19th " y ` Renton, WA• 98056 Renton, WA 98056' •_ Renton, WA 98056 - • Carla Ball Steve.Altrinzer. . -' . • Geraldine A. Cunningham ' 1800 Union Ave. N.E. 1703 Shelton Ave. N.E: - •' 4.100 N.E. 17th Renton,WA 98056 - Renton, WA 98056 - Renton, WA. .98056 , . w • Judith W. Sheldon • ' ' Cindy Altrinzer. Jolene Richmond 1813 Union,Ave. N.E. . •-. ' ' 1703 Shelton-Ave. N.E. ' • 1709 Whitman Ave.N,E, Renton, WA 98056 • ,' : Renton,•WA 98056' • Renton, WA 98056. • Owen K. Hall Shirley •ey:F: Peterson Vicki Hulses 1732;Union Ave. 1808.Union Ave, N.E. 1729 Whitman Ave. N.E. Renton`, WA 98056 :,. . Renton, WA 98056 _ Renton, WA ,98056 ' = • Tom Czaplinski Jeff Crawford. • ' ,' '� ,; � � � Doug Richmond' 18'01 Union Ave: N.E. 1724'Union;Ave. N.E. : . 1709 Whitman Ave. N.E. • Renton, WA 98056 • Renton, WA 98056 , Renton, WA 98056 ' E.Bueno . N. L. James - Don Westphall �' 1907 Vashon .Ct. N:E. • . . . ., 1724 Union Ave. N.E.° • 4109 N.E. 17th Renton,-WA 98056 Renton, WA. 98056 Renton, WA. 98056 ' S r I F• •' f� •'h, ,f-' i" >l �f;,i.f,.,p: 1.,sly 4 Joan Westphall Virgil Hill 'Lyle K. Coblert 4109 N.E. 17th • . ' 4080 N.E. 19th ' 4603 N.E. 20th ' • Renton, WA 98056 : • ' Renton, WA 98056 : : Renton,.WA -98056 Paul C. Wold K. Evans : Larry Kraft, , - 4132 N.E. 17th 1710 Shelton•Ave:N.E. 1911 Union Ave. N.E.' ' • • Renton, WA 98056 . Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 • Carolyn L. Wold • ', i Ronald Hedlin Nancy Kraft 4132 N.E. 17th ,, 1709 Shelton Ave. N.E. . • 1911 Union Ave: N.E. Rentori, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 - Renton, WA 98056 . Anthony A. Helt Bob E. 'Abernethy , Y � Shannon Bueno ' 1712 Whitman Ave: N.E. i • 1609.Shelton;Ave. N.E. 1907 Vashon Ct. N.E., ' Renton, WA 98056 ' . Renton,.WA 98056 . Renton; WA 98056 - • Linda S. Helt George Credit` Rick Cordiga 1712 Whitman.Ave. N.E: 1700 Union Ave. N.E. ' 1901.Vashon Ct. N.E. Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 'Renton, WA 98056 ' Steve Walker ' Karen E. Zerby Joan Cordiga ' . 1913•Vashon Ct. N.E. . 1807 Union Ave. ME. - 1901 Vashon Ct. N.E. Renton, WA 98056. . , . ' " • - Renton, WA 98056 - - • Renton, WA. 98056 , . - � . Annette Walker Riena;Corznati' - . - • N.E. Cemper 191,3 .Vashon Ct. N.E: 1813 Union Ave. N.E. • 3910 N.E. 17th St. Renton, WA ,98056 j: ' Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA '9805.6 Janene' R. Johnson . : Steve Greer • f.1908 Vashon Ct. N.E. ; 4205 N.E. 19th . . Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA •98056 . :: . ` • Stephen H. Johnson , r Frederick Hill; 1908 Vashon Ct.'N.E. 4100 N.E. 19th St. Renton, WA 98056 . .: . ,. Renton,WA -98056 - Louis E. Borges ' Carol Hill 4123 N.E. 19th I,.. • 4080 N.E. 19th St. • ' Renton, WA 98056 . ' ' Renton, WA. 98056 i� 'r !r Mary Lou Harbeck. . :� • • Katherine L. Hawley Patricia Wallace • 3507 N.E. 11 th ;' 1717 Union'Ave:RE. 4205 N.E. 19th • Renton, WA. 98056 • Renton, WA 98056- Renton, WAS 98056 . ' Good Shepherd of Washington Timothy N.'Potter I. Watkins .' : . - • 18940 Marine View Dr; S.W. ' .1892 Shelton Ave. N,E..,: • 4211 N,E: 19th , ' . . Seattle, WA 9816E Renton, WA' 98056' - Renton, WA 98056" • _ Darlene Lang • Jennifer L. Potter ' Ada Jean Hill 4751 South 172nd Place. • .' 1892 Shelton Ave. N.E. 4100 N.E. 19th f.Seattle, WA 9816E . �: Renton, WA 98056 •'••' . •.'Renton;WA. 98056 , • Howard R. Kienle : �' Scott L. Surber ' • • Kim Tessin 732 Melody Lane . :' j. 3839 N.E:.19th:St. 4203 N.E. 19th Enumclaw, WA• 98022 Renton, WA 98056 • Renton, WA•, 98056 • Mary L. .Czaplinski- • Annelle J. 'Abernethy • . FloydFiggins 1801 Union Ave..N.E., _ ` ; 1'609.Shelton Ave. N E: , 4225 N.E. 19th • Renton, WA 98056 I; , • Renton, WA .98056 Renton, WA 98056 Carla Ball Steve Altrinzer : Geraldine.A: Cunningham • 1800 Union Ave. ,N.E..'• 1703.Shelton Ave. N.E 4100-N.E. 17th Renton, WA '.98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056. ' Judith,W.. .Sheldon Cindy Altrinzpe Jolene Richmond 1.813 Union Ave. N.E: ::,• • ` 1703.Shelton Ave., N.-E. •: 1709 Whitman Ave:N:E..• Renton, WA 9805E 'Renton', WA 98056 : Renton, WA 98056 • Owen:K'. Hall " • Shirley F.'Peterson • Vicki Hulses 1732 Union Ave.' 1808 Union Ave. N.E. • 1729 Whitman Ave, N;E, .;Renton, WA 98056 . .Renton, WA 98056 • ' Renton, WA' 98056 Tom Czaplinski !{. •Jeff Crawford Doug Richmond 1801 Union N.E. - ; : :172'4 Union Ave. N.E. '• - 1709 Whitman Ave: N:E: Renton, WA Ave..98056 Renton,:WA 9805.E Renton,.WA 98056 • " • E.Bueno . N. L. James • Don -Westphall, 1907 .Vashon Ct. N.E. 1724 Union Ave. N.E. '.-;ii, ' � 4109.N.E. 17th • Renton, WA ,9805E I Renton, WA 98056 • Renton, WA •98056 - ,}• ..�`;.. {L"'�•i•'•,:{,.,., .{: ;fir .. ,. .t f' .• r .. >iT,,.;; err.: h. .ti Joan Westphall Virgil Hill Lyle K. Coblert 4109 N.E. 17th 4080 N.E. 19th 4603 N.E. 20th Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 : Renton, WA 98056 Paul C. Wold K. Evans • • ' Larry Kraft, 4132 N.E. 17th 1710 Shelton Ave. N.E. 1911 Union Ave. N.E.' Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Carolyn L. Wold 'Ronald Hedlin Nancy Kraft ` 4132 N.E. 17th 1709 Shelton Ave. N.E. '' 1911 Union Ave. N.E. Renton, WA 98056 . "` ' Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Anthony A. Helt • Bob E. Abernethy ' Shannon Bueno - 1712 Whitman Ave. N.E. 1609 Shelton Ave. N.E. 1907 Vashon Ct. N.E. Renton, WA 98056 . Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Linda S. Helt George Credit Rick Cordiga 1712 Whitman Ave. N.E. 1700 Union Ave. N.E. 1901 Vashon Ct. N.E. Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Steve Walker , Karen E. Zerby Joan Cordiga'• . 1913 Vashon Ct. N.E. • ;, . 1807 Union.Ave. N.E. 1901 Vashon Ct. N.E. . Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Annette Walker Riena Corznati N.E. Cemper 1913 Vashon Ct. N.E. 1813 Union Ave. N.E. 3910 N.E. 17th St. Renton, WA 98056 ' Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Janene R. Johnson ' Steve Greer 1908 Vashon Ct. N.E. ' 4205 N.E. 19th ' ' Renton, WA 98056' Renton, WA 98056 ' . , Stephen H. Johnson Frederick Hill 1908 Vashon Ct. N.E. 4100 N.E. 19th St. • Renton, WA 98056 , Renton, WA 98056 . Louis E. Borges Carol Hill ' 4123 N.E. 19th ' '. 4080 N.E. 19th St. Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 ' C ..:,�—,' ;r is I,;...r , . • r ..P"�' 'Orr;i�:.. •.y• ..L' ;��,,.' .r .� r , Mary Lou Harbeck 1, Katherine,L. Hawley Patricia Wallace • 3507 N.E. 11 th I 1717 Union Ave. N.E. 4205 N.E. 19th Renton, WA 98056 �� Renton, WA "98056. Renton, WA 98056___- Good Shepherd of Washington Timothy N. Potter . . . . "I. Watkins • 18940 Marine View Dr.,S.W. 1892 Shelton Ave. N.E. 4211 N.E. 19th , Seattle, WA 98166 Renton, WA 98056 . ' . Renton, WA 98056 - y Darlene Lang Jennifer L. Potter ••• Ada Jean Hill 4751 South 172nd Place 1892 Shelton Ave. N.E.•. 4100 N.E. 19th Seattle, WA •98166 '. Renton, WA 98056 ' - - 'Renton, WA 98056 Howard R. Kienle Scott L. Surber . .' • ` Kiln Tessin. • 732 Melody Lane , . 3839 N.E. 19th St: 4203.N.E. 19th. Enumclaw, WA 98022' Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 ' Mary L. Czaplinski - �; ' Annelle J. Abernethy" Floyd Figgins 1801 Union Ave. N.E. . 1609 Shelton Ave. N.E. ' . 4225•N.E. 19th.. Renton, WA 98056 • Renton, WA 9,8056. ' ' . ' ' . Renton, WA 98056- , Carla Ball I ' • •Steve Altrinzer ' ' • • ' Geraldine A. Cunningham 1800 Union Ave. N.E. ' . ` . .• ' . 1703 Shelton.Ave. N.E. " 4100 N.E. 17th ' Renton, WA 98056 • � Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056' ai Judith:W. Sheldon • ' ' Cindy Altrinzer Jolene Richmond - 1813 Union Ave. N.E. - 1703 Shelton Aver N.E. 1709 Whitman Ave.N.E: Renton, WA 98056 ''• , Renton, WA 98056 , ' Renton, WA' 98056 • it Owen K:Hall • ' ; '. .. " Shirley"F. Peterson - Vicki Hulses 1732'Union,Ave.' , • ' ' 1808 Union Ave. N.E. - • ' 1729 Whitman Ave. N.E. Renton,.WA 98056 ' Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 — Tom Czaplinski - Jeff Crawford Doug Richmond 1801 Union Ave. N.E. - 1724 Union Ave. N.E. 1709 Whitman Ave. N.E. Renton, WA 98056 P. Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 E.Bueno - N. L. James r Don Westphall ' 1907 Vashon Ct.'.N.E. 1 . . ' 1724 Union Ave: N.E." ' 4109 N.E. 17th ' Renton, WA 98056 , .i Renton, WA 98056 Renton,.WA 98056 , ,:.9.,rJI '.'1• ''' ''''' :t .v :"•:CC +a1Fh,Y .:n:4,.:,}� ,7i: • '5;qit. d` a. .�1 i a k, ` a '; .. 2J Joan Westphall Virgil Hill Lyle K. Coblert, 4109 N.E. 17th 4080 N.E. 19th •- 4603 N.E..20th Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 , Renton, WA 98056 Paul C. Wold K. Evans. ' • Larry Kraft, .• 4132 N.E. 17th . - 1710 Shelton Ave. N.E. 1911 Union'Ave. N.E.' . Renton, WA 98056 '�' . Renton, WA 98056 • Renton, WA 98056 Carolyn L. Wold • Ronald Hedlin ' Nancy Kraft - 4132 N.E. 17th 1709 Shelton Ave. N.E. 1911 Union Ave. N.E. Renton, WA 98056 • Renton, WA 98056 ' ' Renton, WA_ ,98056 , _ Anthony A. Helt - Bob E. Abernethy Shannon Bueno ' 1712 Whitman Ave. N.E. 1609 Shelton Ave. N.E. 1907 Vashon Ct: N.E. Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 . . Renton, WA 98056 Linda S. Helt 'I . George Credit • . . Rick Cordiga , 1712 Whitman Ave. N.E. I! 1700 Union Ave. N.E. ' 1901 Vashon Ct. N.E. Renton, WA 98056 . I Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Steve Walker Karen E. Zerby Joan Cordiga " 1913 Vashon Ct. N.E. 1807 Union Ave. N.E...' 1901. Vashon Ct. N.E. Renton, WA 98056• . { Renton, WA 98056 , ' Renton, WA 98056 ' Annette'Walker ` Riena Corznati N.E. Cemper '1913 Vashon"Ct. N.E. ' 1813 Union Ave. N.E. 3910 N.E. 17th St. Renton, WA 98056 - - f' ' • Renton, WA 98056 . Renton, WA 98056 • Janene R. Johnson . ' ry�. , Steve Greer , 1908 Vashon Ct. N.E. . I' . 4205 N.E. 19th . Renton, WA .98056 . f , Renton, WA 98056 ' • Stephen H. Johnson Frederick Hill • , 1908 Vashon Ct. N.E. , 410Q N.E. 19th St. - ' Renton, WA 98056 , '.i . Renton, WA 98056 ' Louis E. Borges , ' ' •- Carol Hill • 4123 N.E. 19th ' ' ' ' - 4080 N.E. 19th St. ' • Renton, WA 98056 1! Renton, WA 98056 ' ' ' ' n , Mary Lou Harbeck Katherine L. Hawley Patricia Wallace 3507 N.E. 1 l th 1717 Union Ave. N.E. ; 4205 N.E. 19th Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 '. Good Shepherd of Washington Timothy N. Potter . . I. Watkins 18940 Marine View.Dr. S.W.` 1892 Shelton Ave. N.E. 4211 N.E. 19th Seattle, WA 98166 , Renton, WA 98056 ' Renton, WA 98056 Darlene Lang Jennifer L. Potter Ada Jean Hill • 4751 South 172nd Place I' 1892 Shelton Ave. N.E. 4100 N.E. 19th- ' Seattle, WA 98166. . Renton, WA ,98056 Renton, WA 98056 Howard R. Kienle Scott L. Surber Kim Tessin 732 Melody Lane ii 3839 N.E. 19th St. 4203 N.E. 19th Enumclaw, WA 98022 ! •. Renton, WA 98056 Renton,, WA 98056 Mary L. Czaplinski '•I'. Annelle J. Abernethy ' Floyd Figgins ' 1801 Union Ave. N.E. I. 1609 Shelton Ave. N:E. 4225 N.E. 1.9th Renton, WA 98056 " Renton, WA 98056 _ Renton, WA 98056 • Carla Ball Steve Altrinzer Geraldine A. Cunningham 1800 Union Ave. N.E. i 1703 Shelton Ave. N.E. 4100 N.E. 17th Renton, WA 98056 ' Renton, WA 98056 . Renton, WA 98056 • Judith W. Sheldon I Cindy Altrinzer . • . Jolene Richmond 1813 Union Ave. N.E. . 1703 Shelton Ave. N.E. 1709 Whitman Ave.N.E, Renton, WA . 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Owen K. Hall �' Shirley F. Peterson Vicki Hulses 1732 Union Ave. I! 1808 Union Ave. N.E. • 1729 Whitman Ave. N.E. Renton, WA 98056 j;' Renton, WA 98056 ..Renton, WA 98056 , Tom Czaplinski II . Jeff Crawford Doug Richmond 1801 Union Ave. N.E. 1724 Union Ave. N.E. - 1709 Whitman Ave. N.E.' Renton, WA 98056 ' . Renton, WA 98056 '. . Renton, WA 98056 E.Bueno N. L. James 0 Don Westphall 1907 Vashon Ct. .N.E. 1724 Union Ave. N.E.- 4109 N.E. 17th Renton, WA 98056 I Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 ` --.,emu---,,'...'` 'a'' ,•'S'•.f.. - _ -°;'.•7:.,=.f _ - Joan Westphall • Virgil Hill Lyle K. Coblert '4109 N.E. 17th - 4080 N.E. 19th , ._ 4603 N.E. 20th Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 ' • P ' Renton, WA 98056. ' " Paul C. Wold • K. Evans Larry Kraft, .4132 N.E. 17th,. 1710 Shelton Ave. N.E. 1911 Union Ave. N.E:' • Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Carolyn L. Wold l ' Ronald Hedlin Nancy Kraft 4132 N.E. 17th 1709 Shelton Ave. N.E: 1911 Union Ave. N.E. ' Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 . : 'Renton; WA 98056 ' • Anthony A. Helt Bob E. Abernethy ' ' ' Shannon Bueno' 1712 .Whitman'Ave. N.E. ! 1609 Shelton Ave. N.E. .. 1907 Vashon Ct. N.E. Renton, WA 98056 . Renton, WA 98056 ' Renton, WA 98056 Linda S. Helt George'Credit Rick Cordiga 1712 Whitman Ave. N.E. 1700 Union Ave. N.E. .' 1901 Vashon Ct. N.E. Renton, WA •98056 ; . 'Renton, WA 98056 ' ' ' ' Renton, WA 98056 Steve Walker ' Karen E. Zerby •Joan Cordiga 1913 Vashon Ct. N.E. 1807 Union Ave. N.E. 1901 Vashon Ct. N.E. Renton, WA 98056 ' ,. ' Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 • Annette Walker ; Riena Corznati N.E. Cemper 1913 Vashon Ct. N.E. 1813 Union Ave.''N.E. . . .• 3910 N.E. 17th St. Renton, WA 98056 r Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Janene, R. Johnson ' ' , . Steve Greer ,, • , 1908 Vashon Ct. N.E. . ' ' ' ' 4205 N.E. 19th ' . ' • ' Renton, WA 98056 Renton; WA 98056 Stephen H. Johnson • Frederick Hill ' • 1908:Vashon Ct. N.E. ' 4100 N.E. 19th St. ." ' Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Louis E. Borges . Carol Hill ' • 4123 N.E. 19th , 4080 N.E.' 19th St. Renton, WA '98056 ;. Renton, WA .98056 } EXHIBIT NO. ITEM NO. ell°/o - arS .. "a . p/ O - r$ NEIGHBORS OF RESIDENCE EAST IN ISSAQUAH THIS HOME SERVES EIGHT DEVELOPMENTALLY DISABLED ADULTS -/777'.7 ler .(^1,!_i_ZZ,W7 l',91? 71- rwrvi-ow-' ff-i- - ,- .--- -7 i i-mi..4 -/?-47117 nr, 071'2 ' ''-19 - '-)Y.f 1 _ . '()/ -72717/211 / /r. --72? MP-- r:v4194 -?s41 1-16 -,---f,x-r,04-71/- -7e. (V--721p -)-4-1i-r -7-7'7.717;:j /L .,--7,2f- -7w-14/3- lb 7,4)"' /"1-' 17 -›2g ' -'ar 7.14 _ l'a r7)// 9' irl4ry /7 71:1Y44 /(71/ --7-,,,,/ 7,-4, 92,-K r'.--/2"-: 2' 71'4.'7 P- 1 - rg it, gy ,_._ ,.- f 7r, , --24g? -771-- „: , ,__,,,, ,,,,,e,„7, ,-,,./v ,2z:/c-74,,-(2,-,-7.-rs- , $ -_9 (749,„-,,A-v ,IA-7-=9 , ( i'- 'vj/. r 17— r ''—t0 71r— (4- ,,A —1-e-t-(-7/ 71 /77/7,47 q-)(* r'i ' 6-7vf 7'-1''-/--wr ' 'v 71- 14-'7 e-n7- , , 7 -r4.7, 7-P-oc/ -7-y_ -a,-7-, ?-(71- ,--ri,- --- ,,,-- -)- _-,:,Ir we,r,-,, 4-7-40, - 114e. d--7-ag - 1-P - -ri-ei --72.2..-- a-Pwin--?-rp --et- rt.r-)-1-7' '/L7-7'"V .`--7 4n1r-7,);'," '-"'-"' —,/ 72- 7-'?" -?-7e '.-D-)-4v* 4"-e- ,i'--A__= -?-1-/ - -i v 6/ yr w, -' `°r (x1-71P, ='LT-7 -P-4-(0, .(� r- :j�' � '?'1� /Tom' (J� � �;4 -' le-tRvi 1 -, r .o G 'Dr ° 'lv19 /71-v 7 I- 7 -11"- ,yam �-o5^ t ,Avg LLS %c t-r p'k �y„,y.,,, ,J..",,, .P4v..../ ,triii,43:, Lc" v.A.Nak ‘Alkft,-‘ ,,,,,,,jt l'Aj`)"9")s- A--\icr1/4, . . i".., AL a i, 1,,,,,Lc), ,,,,,ty... 1)-4°Li‘v° '°"1'-'‘b-414 dk,.. . t ,-- - 1)4-is--,Q.9.A- ..,p\ja.,., '..'&t. 3,,,„ ,,,,,x.., Ji _Lovoi..._ AVIT. Ar\te..3 ja j..A., t , 41\45.VVN ik.k, ...1 ,,..t.. i ft-A'N‘VS%-4 "4)LtAd‘%/r .Alk vajulAwku,k,ik . _ .&9.)'c. iirAlC" •, .. 4j\kl-vv‘ jk.k. 1 i ‘C\tAkrao0 14-116it‘AJL ' i' 4,010 ..dLe#1‘ \A-LCX:PY\AVIN".2^NocA ‘Ak4P-6-4‘diczoi "41\rkift. INAjdo AksiL ''AbolotioAdoo •ft.L001. j11'.‘ 'n°06A.WN • 7.... z— s8 • •—••,. • • • ;x , I ,. ,.• ..is . I , .. . • • 1. . I' .:3 „,....< ... `IPir:to...^ , • , ,.•.•, , •!tit,. • •*t. ‘t. . • `"14..3 e' ''. . A •- , t; i Nik! • 1.,•,.-* ; • s— ' •• . *.r... • "• ••••• F b . ' ' • •4. v 4,4.; •''.kg j ik. ' ' ''..47., -*"/` ' r • • A • {L• ' .s 14 % r•-", . ' • t • - i-• .r.:---.....• ,.• - .7'. * •* *,, , • 1 .. .. --..i : • e°11 1 ..j • .. ' N 0.. . • ‘6..V. .'' '1 4.71 4 ,W • r. ..' ; It . , 3,!t.• • .4 4 .40 r.. • ./...1` 1/4.: - (..• ' *: 'I -- :`. -`' •t l'i'•L,s-• . '• ' 4 • • imp. - • , t ;:•• • '• ' 0- .., 4 ,. .. . NI.•6: •'• It .. • • f.: * .• I ' .. . -'' .-C • . •• -4- • '‘F ''' ! i ,•• . ‘t 4 1 . „ • .1. , ... '4,,irk _„4 , gr* . 7111 •l'' . . •14.1 .,,‘ . *• # • . • • V • .J. 11.4.7 " .1 . • • ..N •- a. . • .! ..., - --• . .1Tc. • •• • f •(,.•' ;4011*P a' „go. .•. . • _ t. .S. '...., • '8 .t:.. • -t f:,,iii„, - • 4 ' ,.i.v...,., ..... th. ... 6 t , ... , ii,...r. • • 4 rierio. *.• 4 . ...ma. : .-.. -.'s^"t .4. .4' 04, , • 0 .,7 -s N. I Il :.`• . V:. ... ' •f• $ - i-. .. gr..- • ... rt-rf•.1 .14.,+•,.#Zt • 4.‘i.k`...wii• 1 ' Ir. • " ' . It I V t ' A .. .6,, ‘i• .I i 4. • ... ;.z ;• ,1 • . • '1`f• . . 2 — , _....604 A, . , . ., 4 ,„ ,,, :,,. • .- . , , • . .. . . . • „.....-„ • i.: ".. .. . , .. . le" ..'•%••figi' i- il.' ..e* .. 104,Z• t -•e- . .-..4*0t s',..illP;*•••• ,srli .•'' ,. 'st,,- • VI IP • / . t • 'e‘-11/4 • •a • . ). ... ••. if 4 4. sit. 7., Ak . • • ... :„...,....,, 17. .• .-• ' . ., • • - • A.. '•it.:*4- —Ay- i.-t. .1. t•i,..?, ii.1.,_„ ,.. • , • . .„- .:14,„; „to . II. • It. 1,0 I •, .. . •, , ,c •• . ix - ..,• . , . t ' •k; t.• ' - '-i. . .• • • la ' r . ' ".•- , c 4 .‘ " .„.. ,.A...,•11e: , ...*. ..; 4 . r • ,:t. 4 , . V•• ./ -.? -er i .'..ii... ' • ' ' ' •• 4••,I* 4 .:,...4.', . ••.=.4 ..C. ; 4. % ..? .•*,.... , If I • •111,...4f .4. . • . ' '7'r • .' ''''s ilt '11."'7, • - : , . , „.•' ... • i ,"- • ‘11 . , ..... ^.3. • 1Ill ....\ , , e 11 Is 11 r t • 13111.11.-'— tIJ ti a . .• ill: 1.,. t ..-7 .- 7 .- 4r• '", :,/ 11 ... illi . , , f XiNik4k, :,* -'4 ''''.. '' • 1 . i .. , . • 1.' i,!LAN , ., .. r.. ,r' Ii 1. • -'... . ' N 4'41' • " •t — r ' -* . • s-,. a ...1. ••• „ .. .: " . -,.7A4N -• ." i ,., 4. V. v• ,, . 40,';. ' • - ••• . •• ZI.4 „ • 0 •..... ,o, f`• •'.• '4.k `4 • '. .f . 1 • • • ..f. '• . • j ' • ':1;kk•16 & ) ' •t4 - ' 1 1111 V 4. 44r. ,, ,t, • ' .1. S. •• ..• III .,s. ....t.:. ..,. E k 4.ts #:-•4 -„4,I,' '7e*. L. _ _i 't . ..c•'.: I i I ‘‘.• ,',- • 1 A L.,,. .„ . • , a ••• III ; ..0. . . . • .. . Adren 11‘_ 1., . •• . •' ..• t ,, . -.........m.sussa .• - -V... ',. . • *b 111 ..‘4..'•N... 1.4e4 V19 .,•,.. . .. 111114‘11 t* . t'....tr..• • i '' i ,4 . . ,1 14•it. •4. 4 • 4 • , -I . ,0. • '.4•• .- ' k • A • 4 ,,,it : . jr, . .• i . _. lc W. . .•')0 1 *I*4 ' '11 1:' •• .,iii,o,t,... . I• , .' ! Ili 1 ,.• r 11 ..t. • •. . •..• . 1,i • ' 01 10 'E f " .., ...7* . • • •4 t' , . • • A ' ,, V ). !• • 1 . ''' • 1 - • It' . \ ' 7-67 11.N " 'I 4 I rl I. r.t i -gr/ ' - v ,4 t+ . . 1. �/ 14, Ili 111 _ Illir - A '� ...i 4: , ifif, " e 1 ,i '� ' . ..., • . , . •.,. ..,k • t• ,.4. . .: : ,• .i.i. . f ali, "Sit-' — ,: 1.41:tti41416 a i It . f % , , ,., ,, ,,,, ...... .: 4; __ . .., -• 44 i kr • . liK.1 \. ., , t.i , , - r 1 , f e 1 , rir t t \ . 1 /, , .• 44%4 t ,11 ,..• .) tX 1/::' - 1 )11(' ''4 +t �, -y. , 1 •.mot 1,• .<• r ' • • 1} • •4 I-s • * •t# • 'ti., ., . _AN f f ' Ati • ' , 1 • ., .'1 a.. / .:-.. -, , ' ;..L.-. 4it.- .' 4 • 11, ‘ Aa j -111111111111F ‘ • .. ;•• r ,, # ";,,,;•, :,..i ; •i,.• .** . '', i V; ‘-v• ;., .`'d '4. •� a�. 4 - .1 41 IL.,, ,Nm .11i i a''41111 Sillikt. .' • % • w t a 14 vori- 4• "-C qIB1T NO ...if a NO .;• a • "4o..1,1.- --7.11 ...k.!*-'i: . • 4vimisilii, r .�� i - y,o - ...fro—..4. Y 7 ya Ss :r i - ~-. •-� _.s - J. . .. v Ste:- •, s. • _° f tit.' tit,„ r%vft v M < 74.41"4 ..';• . 41. . -r--e_ IV_ ..r.s-,, -...ce,i '.:- I ."' 1Ka44- _ � _ fy+��t T; :1. t 00 TITBIT NO. NO. !. ; EXHIBIT -� ITEM e 0/0 -• re LETTERS OF SUPPORT FROM NEIGHBORS WHO LIVE ADJACENT TO THE PROPOSED GROUP HOME SITE ON N.E. 19TH STREET AND UNION AVENUE N.E. a�77 �� 1��ry/ c ly•/.itl F. 2G ; •I t'� .� Ind --s r \ = r s>~izzl \ 1♦ ��i 7r s.cit !•, L; ..4 LA!w•Nz•S.s /,•7 -• l-•r/ IN - Ili • �` ( �f I ,. , F.1„r �.. s ? q ty+tt ! ; i z O\J• • " !;f ...- ' C - •,,.•�"-''r- rs >< _ I,Ii `p ty = • 24/ p rs • c I• ra / , +',1•.= Q 2 - ,p -,..• .r +t 3b{�5' °,mot b° �° o °r'° • 0A •+�� •i • E Z w �.r .� Y `1 t .i v ,.I• N E. 20TH. ST. 0 w P 3 C 10t0 .aw . 1wr c., 7 --. ♦ t3 f•I T t l I ' Z Z i • P hh 3te.c• I �/ • ••• to` I• r/j' M �� or* I t,�,• 14 1 s T 1. �s , 'me r W ° ,,e 1 sN �e t3. s • ,_ . _ io 5.91mit b ,.e ,� 10't/ toy) /tomAr //IC 0/L L/00 Jul.7V i - - a /t'.N /r . �71I- • 7Y= >s •.+V••?- ..w Ind ��7� y 1® .r•.rr•N ..V R,7l js • ® r•r- F. ,4,.1• a ,040 ♦ y . +ii'. w .•"l z s:s - , p t,0 1ie ZZ y-= ``sQ 1,t ``0 `./ //O`4. 'C. ASV '� Y t� '� . .472 • .- • ,S . �9 - - .Y f2 �° z. '`y t i ° + IotO h /030 low !oro r 5 f>• I o A+ p z f.4`t,>r ` �° • + t�° �# .. __ 1090 D rs Ad.'-- erg rr • 1000 09 1 o S Szr \ fit"' /is ►� ; �.�.. u.s-' • -ro�tls ' 10s' .,• Y N. E . 19 TH. St. z,e M /..•tf 1 u ♦ , �10.D se �s� .- 6 as..Jae rr,. ! n. .ee '. �.Z• s-u-Az.. . 2 } ♦A5 `j. >1_ j• « 1.a ►4. - 1 . z` a 4 M.7 /l +,t ? r2/` n K C 1 t " 5 _ tt !S \♦ �,fls 11�'✓ z it,.'L ';• �. _ I I , Ii� Y Wit`A z. A's I,° of s .,,4K. 'A = j0.0 f. ...01 1, \.•5 y !� f..- 77 •a t' s7 4. Y 0' � � � sf-.v-.,� � j Zo4ss1 •a �t ,•,�� r'3 _., of o+pO :.4.1 `J �� �� ocx•d i ,90 Qe ',� ? A�. I . ? tj •+�tsl� 2`� �o . 90.tf o� �p9' ) Yid ��4 • tttl.~.. ;toi a.� ♦�ti® ! 2I Zr3 I.t�♦' p i ►� //S t� j " 5f' it • ••' D j7 .r•, 3< 1 ��f� • r l iBa. '. ® N: ,• w,..Zy +• arr.t\I'N .t �.s� a ,. �1 4 •� / s Jos.e7 I z,e / r 63. ♦ h 3•.es/ .r-z-'�± <,.fe7\f>>4 1�4 N E. 19 TH 45I0- s dr° t 4"\9/ z s-.'? "1 7 r , 3Es-ss-e7di c►odsr •a)r$E. 1©6TH. 5�../zz-yr:.� ror.ea.•- -' Lj b �isa....s.tr � ar•" / • �S Io d ---------�.c- h : .,T •r, � ` .JAI�,•_t��" otiol - . 7 ��o/li.7.• •� �� .s. 1 .•I 't ,at� ., ♦ .* „ ,' 4i* • 11".I • a 4�1 "4 �� 4��t> t....,..f." zczs 1 OT. I. • E *"K > ` 0e • , i . 0 7Z i "\ ``� Xp s1 . P. 2y 4' } ,. + t,>• p9s� yl of 1 • R -C- , ♦ P � ) 1 ) �1 - ! \ri p}r ,t1A♦ ip Ise. r 0 ���r M /.// ilb a i ` r ,, ff'/c. •L Jt ; °gW sw 1,.,�p�rc"' .. , /r7- Z4 ~ �/ 1 00c �• ^*r-..►-it.. j ra " •{ t �- i�, if '-i'--.s ,i i�,Si' tt,!♦ . 71/ O f' '2•. �''c c .s..s. ,.Si ,> 3 ► 1' Q . /7.a as xs 1 ;"G I7•.I K./? 1• . G °"so 4yS� -'� > 1 'C% ® © O r - ( - /ro 30 z /ov.zi 2 k.v ♦y „n t i r� J >!/ �. " as ZZ v° I y' t :w.,.:.'- r' s♦ ♦ % >e ', 73- i 14.5 f3 cny --.✓iiI.xr- 44 Lb • `-'it t ,Is IIt` 0- a?\ • » \ v' 1 7 • ...... .. V •0 4 _Dfr�Sr r i nw es. lJ' e /1 °o g'�\. C '�r : vf C7c ®„v. '6, . °11°• o v 1'00 yr•o •>• +/ ►• ,.1 a - "> f 23 oor t ` ^°D `Y ,`°�\OJo��' "' - °'i° ,c ,e. 'if' /./ yZt 42 40 44 - �.. .'w ems•j �•c 1. r r ++•r o• ` , 46 `.' 2t on 0020 v• S. �'� �•-. Q` A /.Vt tr... .. t+ aL •l ",Jo\ t,, 0,00 - . \ S. t 1 �rze r.War- F. o�O° .,. /° , "� , •t,, a,.,. '�,o f7 "y1 /lJ i.�c '0 - rrJol�O /`• ;j W ..) •Aj4�t , �.0 f' .''o ,t° , LNI!• ,, +��° a t� 't co > •t�• '4 Op�D ZS 0 y P ...I..a-u r /* ° • 2 ; + V1 �l CSC •• ` 57 • k ► ("(An • sf • -� . �► li ,o or0 vlt,t�.rwLL-ct'-' 'tit• . ,� ..1,313a iy Ac J �. 0 e'vs' t5,t R ^:' -€ 0t10 . .. Ii+i/o tzc f'� .s's 11444 t IB . - J �:u ? ' }�V t,.54 .4i " �ti1'.�'ti'•'. 20 sl\ a r• , yet-o-.i \✓ .oc C 3 • . °t-°'. sir tom. swu �. /.,. LN•a�'i _•�1 t, .i1 t /S i• \-4 4 3 .'t \�f 1• .�71 1♦ \. f ts♦ '.a P^ 1 1 ZL O �c4, JJ o,.o •., - tjV.. o.ao I� O t t t\� xj 'ic>4 >t \° wt� tf 1. o/to �� •`CJh•'2}..►) • co..uc~ OY} .f..a fL.. .s' . •, * 3 c1 t,il. S6 t a•• ;o 1.$ ; 1.4 57 ;w J.. v �+0 ros4 rMMK+ j SE. 107TH. tST. A �, roeso`< 0�o :'s o 'i 0sco? oI,,A y 05)' ; 04, t 0so z° °so' • �f04 If r M II, lb... W : Y rV.I 4 ^a. :v f, M (I Z7 ,v sr ar u �� `' tf.• 3 M A/ C.so 7! ,r r t / v v. >e L or3o • a 1 i � tre 41 _f //-a-isr .vs..+ 'V z t N E 17TN. S T. N a1aR•--+ '• V ♦ '�s ! I °.r...7 • M.l 1 A4- - t Z1 _• F l/:, 70 i • re •z.77 ar is ♦ �t I �` ,k T , 1 ti I /�o� r N. *cm 100 Oo.r rr TO III* 0Ir• ! 05 •.• • 0//O oil•• ' •, ,.rf 1.7 A eim-,Yro' a.4O .14/l tA. T I 1:" /dJ' .r M of •• a°' .1 NI-Of-J244- 1.i'.t'7 I e° 4 .0 • - J `fr 1309.2 ♦ { 1 --- , , - '4r-'•-• o.• zctia " ' »•132 TE- r - L•.+.r a••• 25,77 779.67 t } 5 MI •2-27/ SS • ' / iICM11. ••6 tr2 (II sl 11' + JJG fa � � •. 44 a cn I . z,,l4 --� • • r---- - ^ nQE1 .......a ._yo \IS5 Z of . f et r . .71 1 i.3r----+ `lc). .. 6"011-011'-'1 - .: ?CC . ,:---:-: ' • •.•-,. . .. ' - __..---„".',,,-....:- .. . . , ' ' :Ib . . . `i„ - •.- ,rs- --/' - . ' ..6jue, ..,2010z5.1 ),I___ . . off. 2 ; - 0C 0 -. ' 11.)' 6,i2);_. '4:0•....: -.•.::,. .- ' ' • • • . c-r'44:::iii-Lei..:0- ,: .•Aie.,9-h•-f-r5.-r- I - - • ... • . - • •• - - ---,-.6t,,oyi..67>rdH.0.-t*- . .4 a•. ), 1.-4x:70-p64-›L ' -/A.-e-, . , -,-..- - . . . . :�,cttp-c ) I U� - .... • ' . iv,,p_s41.toy-I. " - "faz_, •• • ' • . . -: [.8.1:3 _; . .U.n i'•or}- . . a, 4I a>_s0,6b t.o,w() / /- % o7 9-d--0409-71 2-10 row a--La rr41/1 rri rA9-07,1 ,Prr) /' 2' - 1 v -vimrC L/L • pca-°g r i 0 (A1414 11 ( et eliut ..G. Catt-4 -.' . ' ' ' ' ' . .. (A)si - • -EU(I vi CO? II O r4- -. P p,trA I ._ 1 , (t. , I _ ftle.A4 r , - .' . 1 ``ehvx c.c.ci �°A-L„- . . , , ' . '. • - - T-,,„ . . 1451 2 c 4 uroJ kd e; MC e T i (3)sS48h '9n-61 NV)Nt� r4 1fa 1 • 1Q43414" ITY4 l'Y‘AA • , . Pre,Ar, „. 11 1,-03, 1-N-71‘1-vt3& n da Liermt. ..Apb-vroft 1-7-0-- -cyloa..ar -- Akrckl -1-val"‘ Pwb {o-Ocrvp-on -r"d-1, --,-a-ae-a-c) --11,4961 `Th'13i r-n-AnsitV rrYsgijanrcP =IN dr: 0A7 2 C 7116' • • A-7rd 4,7,t< A-1--17 • cY,t) ct/0:14-17X ..(44e A 7 ,z4 114,, / ci4 Areifre.„( f• �/ss .ram. E. / y A)&41.rw, Wq Fie Af7 • • • • • / 73 ,iU, -) a .�• •-: • • • -. ; • • . _ • . G/3�/8'f/ L. norvm L'S •-)DP %L•La-024 C>NJ- 7t4 -±4 *"4"' 41"3 4e L .• t)Dov--Ra Qt303- cl) •-tk-i/3 +cop 4.r-CAA. ir`QA-P-P -4- 1-12 ov4- kWet.vv--e 1- RAM [4(111,-- 1 0 1.-Jalf15aN coosi- I rot) 424077-1) divete/-/.1 61.'9 ag). kno•ell' Aeltv f440/tillA ami ahl) # 4°-2e). Aite, Alitem -44"1) a44) 71evi,te/A1 61) )1.077/2). ';12/101 . e412S tr ) /AS AV fil47;40111:2L he) .11).e4A, JA.e.abiitA4itd 6t, /04.67e; .eyr-v 9PAA-• Aoitik /40 9 2)11-11D '&11)6. Ify d D yids6 41 YI � ,508b t! I " ksi)rx"d�{ —7CY' '-r) xfnisvA Fib/ R—b -L 2Pcv;i4 --7.pmp `,--i-rp-P-m - -7T177 7:2/( 119d _?r0 ./° 9"11firii, -.) /21R t)r-112 72 *7.V1PV --)v-ii-r3p9 (ocz-ve P2-X °'112 °,may 701