HomeMy WebLinkAboutECF_SEPA_ Checklist_250821_v1SEPA Environmental checklist September 2023 Page 1
(WAC 197-11-960)
SEPA1 Environmental Checklist
Purpose of checklist
Governmental agencies use this checklist to help determine whether the environmental impacts of your
proposal are significant. This information is also helpful to determine if available avoidance, minimization, or
compensatory mitigation measures will address the probable significant impacts or if an environmental impact
statement will be prepared to further analyze the proposal.
Instructions for applicants
This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Please answer
each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. You may need to consult with an
agency specialist or private consultant for some questions. You may use “not applicable” or “does not apply”
only when you can explain why it does not apply and not when the answer is unknown. You may also attach
or incorporate by reference additional studies reports. Complete and accurate answers to these questions
often avoid delays with the SEPA process as well as later in the decision-making process.
The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time
or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its
environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or
provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact.
Instructions for lead agencies
Please adjust the format of this template as needed. Additional information may be necessary to evaluate the
existing environment, all interrelated aspects of the proposal and an analysis of adverse impacts. The checklist
is considered the first but not necessarily the only source of information needed to make an adequate
threshold determination. Once a threshold determination is made, the lead agency is responsible for the
completeness and accuracy of the checklist and other supporting documents.
Use of checklist for nonproject proposals
For nonproject proposals (such as ordinances, regulations, plans and programs), complete the applicable parts
of sections A and B, plus the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions (Part D). Please completely answer all
questions that apply and note that the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as
"proposal," "proponent," and "affected geographic area," respectively. The lead agency may exclude (for non-
projects) questions in “Part B: Environmental Elements” that do not contribute meaningfully to the analysis of
the proposal.
1 https://ecology.wa.gov/Regulations-Permits/SEPA/Environmental-review/SEPA-guidance/Checklist-guidance
SEPA Environmental checklist September 2023 Page 2
(WAC 197-11-960)
A. Background
Find help answering background questions2
1. Name of proposed project, if applicable:
Valvoline Instant Oil Change
2. Name of applicant:
LeAmber Yisrael, Development Manager, Greenberg Farrow
3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person:
1230 Peachtree St NE, Ste 2900 Atlanta GA 30309; 470-681-4359;
lyisrael@greenbergfarrow.com
4. Date checklist prepared:
July 24, 2025
5. Agency requesting checklist:
City of Renton
6. Proposed timing of schedule (including phasing, if applicable):
Construction is estimated to start in January 2026 and be completed by June 2026.
7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or
connected with this proposal? If yes, explain.
Valvoline may expand the building to add a third service bay. Refer to site plan for
potential future building expansion footprint
8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be
prepared, directly related to this proposal.
Critical Areas Report and Mitigation Plan, dated 07/29/2025
Tree Retention Plan, dated 08/19/2025
Geotechnical Engineering Exploration, dated 07/18/2025
Drainage Report, dated 08/19/2025
9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other
proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain.
No
10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known.
City of Renton, Conditional Use Permit, Building Permit,
11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size
of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to
2 https://ecology.wa.gov/Regulations-Permits/SEPA/Environmental-review/SEPA-guidance/SEPA-checklist-
guidance/SEPA-Checklist-Section-A-Background
SEPA Environmental checklist September 2023 Page 3
(WAC 197-11-960)
describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this
page. (Lead agencies may modify this form to include additional specific information on
project description.)
Proposed of a 2,673 SF Valvoline Instant Oil Change building with new drive-thru lane,
parking, lot, landscaping, utilities, and storm-water facilities on 0.894 AC. Use qualifies as
a vehicle service and repair operation by definition and would include two service bays, a
customer waiting area, a restroom, office and ancillary spaces. Hours of operation will
occur approximately 7 days a week from 8am to 7pm.
12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise
location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township,
and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or
boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and
topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by
the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any
permit applications related to this checklist.
4225 NE 4th St, Renton, WA 9805. Nearest intersection at NE 4th St and Whitman Ct
B. Environmental Elements
1. Earth
Find help answering earth questions3
a. General description of the site:
Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other:
The site is relatively flat with a gradient to the existing catch basins
Circle or highlight one: Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other:
b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)?
1.6% is the steepest slope on the existing conditions
c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat,
muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them, and note any
agricultural land of long-term commercial significance and whether the proposal results
in removing any of these soils.
3 https://ecology.wa.gov/regulations-permits/sepa/environmental-review/sepa-guidance/sepa-checklist-
guidance/sepa-checklist-section-b-environmental-elements/environmental-elements-earth
SEPA Environmental checklist September 2023 Page 4
(WAC 197-11-960)
Typical Profile; A.-0 TO 7 inches: gravelly sandy loam. Bw1.-7 to 21 inches: very
gravelly sandy loam. Bw2. -21 to 30 inches: very gravelly sandy loam. Bg. -30 to 35
inches: very generally sandy loam. 2Cd1. – 35 to 43 inches; very gravelly sandy loam.
2cd2. – 43 to 59 inches: very gravelly sandy loam. Based on the Natural Resource
Conservation Service mapping resource, soils are mapped as Alderwood gravelly
sandy loam (AgC).
d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so,
describe.
None that we are aware of. King County iMap does not identify these parcels or the
general area as erosion hazard, landslide or potential landslides hazard, or seismic
hazard.
e. Describe the purpose, type, total area, and approximate quantities and total affected
area of any filling, excavation, and grading proposed. Indicate source of fill.
Earthwork is required for the site, building, and frontage improvements. Earthwork
will consist of both excavating and filling soils. The earthwork quantities are estimated
to be xxxx CY of cut and xxxx CY of fill. The source of fill material will be determined
during construction and may include re-use of suitable on-site soils.
f. Could erosion occur because of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe.
With proper implementation of a erosion control the best management practices
(BMPs) erosion will be managed.
g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project
construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)?
Approximately 57%.
h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any.
Proposed temporary measures include slit fence, stabilized construction exit, catch
basin inlet protection filters, and ground cover (such as straw, compost, wood chips,
and seeing). These measures may be field adjusted during construction. Permanent
measures include pavement, building roofs, and stabilizing vegetation.
SEPA Environmental checklist September 2023 Page 5
(WAC 197-11-960)
2. Air
Find help answering air questions4
a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal during construction,
operation, and maintenance when the project is completed? If any, generally describe
and give approximate quantities if known.
No adverse emissions are anticipated other than from typical automobiles which will
be on site for service. There will be temporary dust and emissions from vehicles and
equipment used for construction.
b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so,
generally describe.
None.
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any:
None.
3. Water
Find help answering water questions5
a. Surface:
Find help answering surface water questions6
1. Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including
year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe
type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into.
There is a stream (Cowardin Classification R4SBC) west of the parcel, which
ultimately drains south to Cedar River, (based on the National Wetlands Inventory
and the USGS map). An associated wetland is located southwest of the Site within
300 feet.
4 https://ecology.wa.gov/Regulations-Permits/SEPA/Environmental-review/SEPA-guidance/SEPA-checklist-
guidance/SEPA-Checklist-Section-B-Environmental-elements/Environmental-elements-Air
5 https://ecology.wa.gov/Regulations-Permits/SEPA/Environmental-review/SEPA-guidance/SEPA-checklist-
guidance/SEPA-Checklist-Section-B-Environmental-elements/Environmental-elements-3-Water
6 https://ecology.wa.gov/Regulations-Permits/SEPA/Environmental-review/SEPA-guidance/SEPA-checklist-
guidance/SEPA-Checklist-Section-B-Environmental-elements/Environmental-elements-3-Water/Environmental-
elements-Surface-water
SEPA Environmental checklist September 2023 Page 6
(WAC 197-11-960)
2. Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the
described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans.
Yes – the Project will have actions within 200 feet of the wetland/stream, but no
direct impacts to the wetland or stream are proposed.
3. Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed
from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be
affected. Indicate the source of fill material.
N/A
4. Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give a general
description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known.
The project will not require surface water withdrawals or diversions.
5. Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site
plan.
The project site is in zone x and not located within the flood plain per Federal
Emergency Management Agency Mapping, community panel number
53033C0981G, effective date 8/19/2020.
6. Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so,
describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge.
The project does not involve any discharge of waste materials to surface waters.
b. Ground:
Find help answering ground water questions7
1. Will groundwater be withdrawn from a well for drinking water or other purposes? If
so, give a general description of the well, proposed uses and approximate quantities
withdrawn from the well. Will water be discharged to groundwater? Give a general
description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known.
No ground water will be withdrawn. Some surface water runoff may be infiltered
on-site via an infiltration trench.
2. Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or
other sources, if any (domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following
7 https://ecology.wa.gov/Regulations-Permits/SEPA/Environmental-review/SEPA-guidance/SEPA-checklist-
guidance/SEPA-Checklist-Section-B-Environmental-elements/Environmental-elements-3-Water/Environmental-
elements-Groundwater
SEPA Environmental checklist September 2023 Page 7
(WAC 197-11-960)
chemicals…; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number
of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of
animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve.
N/A
c. Water Runoff (including stormwater):
1. Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and
disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this
water flow into other waters? If so, describe.
Sources of runoff include pavement, building roofs, and vegetated areas. Runoff
will be collected and conveyed to an existing system of catch basins and pipes. The
Runoff captured by the existing catch basins is then carried south through a
previously approved and constructed pipe network to a previously approved and
constructed pipe network to a previously approved and constructed water quality-
Detention Pond.
2. Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe.
No.
3. Does the proposal alter or otherwise affect drainage patterns in the vicinity of the
site? If so, describe.
No.
d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water, and
drainage pattern impacts, if any:
Site drives and parking will be paved and graded to collect and convey stormwater via
enclosed pipe. Building roof will include gutters downspouts which will also be
conveyed via enclosed pipe.
4. Plants
Find help answering plants questions
a. Check the types of vegetation found on the site:
☐ deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other
☐ evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other
☒ shrubs
☒ grass
SEPA Environmental checklist September 2023 Page 8
(WAC 197-11-960)
☐ pasture
☐ crop or grain
☐ orchards, vineyards, or other permanent crops.
☐ wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other
☐ water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other
☐ other types of vegetation
b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered?
Site is mostly pavement/asphalt since most of the Site is a parking lot with curb, gutters,
and stormwater infrastructure. Landscaping plants were previously planted that may be
modified with this Project. No native assemblage of plants occur within this Site.
c. List threatened and endangered species known to be on or near the site.
No threatened or endangered plant species occur on or near the site.
d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance
vegetation on the site, if any.
A landscape plan will be developed for construction documents that will include
general plantings, grass and trees.
e. List all noxious weeds and invasive species known to be on or near the site.
Himalayan blackberry, tansy ragwort
5. Animals
Find help answering animal questions8
a. List any birds and other animals that have been observed on or near the site or are
known to be on or near the site.
Examples include:
• Birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other:
• Mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other:
None known.
• Fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other:
8 https://ecology.wa.gov/Regulations-Permits/SEPA/Environmental-review/SEPA-guidance/SEPA-checklist-
guidance/SEPA-Checklist-Section-B-Environmental-elements/Environmental-elements-5-Animals
SEPA Environmental checklist September 2023 Page 9
(WAC 197-11-960)
None known. Many local wildlife species, including small mammals or
songbirds, are expected to use the adjacent riparian corridor, though onsite
habitat is minimal.
b. List any threatened and endangered species known to be on or near the site.
There are no known threated or endangered species on or near the site based on the
State of Washington Priority and Habitat Species (PHS) Mapping resource. The
adjacent stream has a constructed fish blockage (fish exclusion device on a
downstream culvert) that prevents upstream movement of salmonids. Therefore,
listed fish are unlikely to occur in the adjacent stream.
c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain.
Yes – the Site is within the bounds of the Pacific Flyway for a variety of migratory birds
in the western US.
d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any.
The Site is already developed fully except for the existing landscape plantings along the
perimeter of the Site. The Site will not develop the lot beyond the current limits of
pavement. The landscaping required with the Project will provide additional wildlife
habitat onsite as much as is feasible.
e. List any invasive animal species known to be on or near the site.
There are no known invasive animal species known to be on or near the site.
6. Energy and natural resources
Find help answering energy and natural resource questions9
a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet
the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating,
manufacturing, etc.
Electric for heating.
b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so,
generally describe.
The proposed project would not affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent
properties.
9 https://ecology.wa.gov/Regulations-Permits/SEPA/Environmental-review/SEPA-guidance/SEPA-checklist-
guidance/SEPA-Checklist-Section-B-Environmental-elements/Environmental-elements-6-Energy-natural-resou
SEPA Environmental checklist September 2023 Page 10
(WAC 197-11-960)
c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal?
List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any.
Energy conservation features will be per Washington State Energy Code requirements,
which include measures such as building envelope insulation, reduced energy lighting,
energy efficient HVAC and equipment.
7. Environmental health
Health Find help with answering environmental health questions10
a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk
of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur because of this
proposal? If so, describe.
There are no environmental health hazards that would occur because of this proposal.
1. Describe any known or possible contamination at the site from present or past uses.
There is no known contamination at the site from past or present uses.
2. Describe existing hazardous chemicals/conditions that might affect project
development and design. This includes underground hazardous liquid and gas
transmission pipelines located within the project area and in the vicinity.
There are no known existing hazardous chemical conditions that might affect
project development and design.
3. Describe any toxic or hazardous chemicals that might be stored, used, or produced
during the project's development or construction, or at any time during the
operating life of the project.
Motor Oil, Gear Oil, Washer Fluid, Transmission Fluid, Antifreeze, Battery
Corrosive Liquid, Fuel System Treatment, Waste Motor Oil.
4. Describe special emergency services that might be required.
No special emergency services would be required.
5. Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any.
There are no proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health
hazards.
10 https://ecology.wa.gov/Regulations-Permits/SEPA/Environmental-review/SEPA-guidance/SEPA-checklist-
guidance/SEPA-Checklist-Section-B-Environmental-elements/Environmental-elements-7-Environmental-health
SEPA Environmental checklist September 2023 Page 11
(WAC 197-11-960)
b. Noise
1. What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example:
traffic, equipment, operation, other)?
There are no significant sources of noise in the area.
2. What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project
on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation,
other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site)?
Short term, the proposed project would result in typical construction noises. Long
term, noise will vehicle maintenance including, such as the use of pneumatic and
starting vehicles.
3. Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any:
The building is in the middle of the site which will reduce off-site noise. Otherwise,
no specific measures are proposed.
8. Land and shoreline use
Find help answering land and shoreline use questions11
a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Will the proposal affect
current land uses on nearby or adjacent properties? If so, describe.
The site is currently vacant and following the conclusion of this project will be
occupied by Valvoline Instant Oil Change service and is not expected to negatively
affect adjacent properties.
b. Has the project site been used as working farmlands or working forest lands? If so,
describe.
The site has not been used as working farmland or working forest land.
c. How much agricultural or forest land of long-term commercial significance will be
converted to other uses because of the proposal, if any? If resource lands have not been
designated, how many acres in farmland or forest land tax status will be converted to
nonfarm or non-forest use?
No agricultural or forest land of long-term commercial significance will be converted
to other uses because of the proposal.
11 https://ecology.wa.gov/Regulations-Permits/SEPA/Environmental-review/SEPA-guidance/SEPA-checklist-
guidance/SEPA-Checklist-Section-B-Environmental-elements/Environmental-elements-8-Land-shoreline-use
SEPA Environmental checklist September 2023 Page 12
(WAC 197-11-960)
1. Will the proposal affect or be affected by surrounding working farm or forest
land normal business operations, such as oversize equipment access, the
application of pesticides, tilling, and harvesting? If so, how?
The proposal will not affect or be affected by surrounding working farm or
forest land operation.
d. Describe any structures on the site.
None.
e. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what?
No. There are no structures on-site.
f. What is the current zoning classification of the site?
CA Commercial Arterial
g. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site?
Commercial.
h. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site?
Not applicable.
i. Has any part of the site been classified as a critical area by the city or county? If so,
specify.
No – the site does not have critical areas mapped onsite by the City. However, an
adjacent Project contained a delineated wetland & stream that extend buffers onto the
Site.
j. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project?
8 people.
k. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace?
None.
l. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any.
SEPA Environmental checklist September 2023 Page 13
(WAC 197-11-960)
None.
m. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected
land uses and plans, if any.
None.
n. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts to agricultural and forest lands of long-
term commercial significance, if any:
None.
9. Housing
Find help answering housing questions12
a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high,
middle, or low-income housing.
None.
b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high,
middle, or low-income housing.
None.
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any:
None.
10. Aesthetics
Find help answering aesthetics questions13
a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is
the principal exterior building material(s) proposed?
Approximately 25-ft above the finished floor.
b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed?
12 https://ecology.wa.gov/Regulations-Permits/SEPA/Environmental-review/SEPA-guidance/SEPA-checklist-
guidance/SEPA-Checklist-Section-B-Environmental-elements/Environmental-elements-9-Housing
13 https://ecology.wa.gov/Regulations-Permits/SEPA/Environmental-review/SEPA-guidance/SEPA-checklist-
guidance/SEPA-Checklist-Section-B-Environmental-elements/Environmental-elements-10-Aesthetics
SEPA Environmental checklist September 2023 Page 14
(WAC 197-11-960)
No views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed.
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any:
No extra measures are proposed to reduce or control aesthetic impacts.
11. Light and glare
Find help answering light and glare questions14
a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly
occur?
The proposed site lighting will be a combination of 24’ pole mounted LED fixtures and
building mounted LED fixtures with full cutoff optics. Lights will operated from dusk to
dawn and will be equipped with motion sensors to reduce lighting levels to 50% when
unoccupied as required by the Washington State energy code.
b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views?
This is not anticipated.
c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal?
None.
d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any:
Proposed light fixture placement and lumen output will be designed to limit lighting
overspill onto adjacent properties to the extent feasible while maintaining safe
lighting levels on-site. Light poles along property lines will include house side shielding
to limit glare and control lighting trespass.
12. Recreation
Find help answering recreation questions
a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity?
Provisions for the existing Wood Chip walking trail are proposed to remain on-site
(along the West property line) adjacent to a local stream and Heritage Park located
about 1,600 LF away from the site.
b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe.
14 https://ecology.wa.gov/Regulations-Permits/SEPA/Environmental-review/SEPA-guidance/SEPA-checklist-
guidance/SEPA-Checklist-Section-B-Environmental-elements/Environmental-elements-11-Light-glare
SEPA Environmental checklist September 2023 Page 15
(WAC 197-11-960)
No.
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation
opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any:
None.
13. Historic and cultural preservation
Find help answering historic and cultural preservation questions15
a. Are there any buildings, structures, or sites, located on or near the site that are over 45
years old listed in or eligible for listing in national, state, or local preservation registers?
If so, specifically describe.
None based on King County IMAP aerial imagery.
b. Are there any landmarks, features, or other evidence of Indian or historic use or
occupation? This may include human burials or old cemeteries. Are there any material
evidence, artifacts, or areas of cultural importance on or near the site? Please list any
professional studies conducted at the site to identify such resources.
No. The Site is mostly paved. This site work was previously permitted and completed
in conjunction with the adjacent townhomes. Cultural resources if of concern would
have been addressed in conjunction with the previous permitting effort by others.
c. Describe the methods used to assess the potential impacts to cultural and historic
resources on or near the project site. Examples include consultation with tribes and the
department of archeology and historic preservation, archaeological surveys, historic
maps, GIS data, etc.
Since there are no known landmarks, features, or other evidence of indigenous people
or historic use or occupation and no known material evidence, artifacts, or areas of
cultural importance on or near the site no methods were used to assess potential
impacts.
d. Proposed measures to avoid, minimize, or compensate for loss, changes to, and
disturbance to resources. Please include plans for the above and any permits that may
be required.
If cultural evidence was encountered during construction or installation of
improvements, work would be halted in the area and a state approve
15 https://ecology.wa.gov/Regulations-Permits/SEPA/Environmental-review/SEPA-guidance/SEPA-checklist-
guidance/SEPA-Checklist-Section-B-Environmental-elements/Environmental-elements-13-Historic-cultural-p
SEPA Environmental checklist September 2023 Page 16
(WAC 197-11-960)
archaeologist/historian would be engaged to investigate, evaluate and/or move or
curate such resources as appropriate.
14. Transportation
Find help with answering transportation questions16
a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site or affected geographic area and
describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any.
The project parcel has public access via NE 4TH Street and Whitman Court NE.
b. Is the site or affected geographic area currently served by public transit? If so, generally
describe. If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop?
Nearest transit stops are NE 4th St & Union Ave NE (approx. 400 LF from our site) and
NE 4th St & Duvall Ave NE (approx. 1300 LF from our site).
c. Will the proposal require any new or improvements to existing roads, streets,
pedestrian, bicycle, or state transportation facilities, not including driveways? If so,
generally describe (indicate whether public or private).
If assessed per Staff Comments dated 11/04/24, half street improvements to include a
pavement width of 76’, a 6” curb, 8’ planting strip and sidewalk, street trees, and
storm drain improvements along NE 4th Street as well as ADA improvements as
required.
d. Will the project or proposal use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air
transportation? If so, generally describe.
No.
e. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project or
proposal? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur and what percentage of
the volume would be trucks (such as commercial and nonpassenger vehicles). What data
or transportation models were used to make these estimates?
Approximately 23 trips per day; ITE estimates
f. Will the proposal interfere with, affect, or be affected by the movement of agricultural
and forest products on roads or streets in the area? If so, generally describe.
16 https://ecology.wa.gov/Regulations-Permits/SEPA/Environmental-review/SEPA-guidance/SEPA-checklist-
guidance/SEPA-Checklist-Section-B-Environmental-elements/Environmental-elements-14-Transportation
SEPA Environmental checklist September 2023 Page 17
(WAC 197-11-960)
No.
g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any:
None.
15. Public services
Find help answering public service questions17
a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire
protection, police protection, public transit, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally
describe.
Not anticipated to any noticeable amount. The need for additional public services such
as fires, police and health care will be typical for commercial developments of this
size. No impact on public transit, or schools is anticipated.
b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any.
None.
16. Utilities
Find help answering utilities questions18
a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse
service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other:
Electricity will be pull from the ROW on 4th NE. Sewer will come from the existing
sewer line in Vashon Ct.
b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service,
and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which
might be needed.
Electricity, water, telephone, sanitary sewer, stormwater, and potentially natural gas.
C. Signature
Find help about who should sign19
17 https://ecology.wa.gov/regulations-permits/sepa/environmental-review/sepa-guidance/sepa-checklist-
guidance/sepa-checklist-section-b-environmental-elements/environmental-elements-15-public-services
18 https://ecology.wa.gov/regulations-permits/sepa/environmental-review/sepa-guidance/sepa-checklist-
guidance/sepa-checklist-section-b-environmental-elements/environmental-elements-16-utilities
19 https://ecology.wa.gov/Regulations-Permits/SEPA/Environmental-review/SEPA-guidance/SEPA-checklist-
guidance/SEPA-Checklist-Section-C-Signature
SEPA Environmental checklist September 2023 Page 18
(WAC 197-11-960)
The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the
lead agency is relying on them to make its decision.
X
Type name of signee:
Position and agency/organization:
Date submitted:
D. Supplemental sheet for nonproject actions
Find help for the nonproject actions worksheet20
Do not use this section for project actions.
Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with
the list of the elements of the environment.
When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities
likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate
than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms.
1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air;
production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of
noise?
• Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are:
2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life?
• Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are:
3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources?
• Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are:
20 https://ecology.wa.gov/regulations-permits/sepa/environmental-review/sepa-guidance/sepa-checklist-
guidance/sepa-checklist-section-d-non-project-actions
SEPA Environmental checklist September 2023 Page 19
(WAC 197-11-960)
4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas
designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection, such as parks,
wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or
cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands?
• Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are:
5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it
would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans?
• Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are:
6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public
services and utilities?
• Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are:
7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or
requirements for the protection of the environment.