Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLUA90-048 Vol #2 -eA„; 4t-le uu4AJz__ «\— 1 fr/? 0 t_ _ -x_e :c ( 73 L-e Ik(F6 ) cr-y, r EXHIBIT • a4-/ 7 C U; R-O'( 7D ITEMkie) 1;116. .enett . \ °)11 00, italite• . . e • Christian Friendship 4, • Spiritual Instruction • Genuine Joy • True Fullfillment? Join us at the Bible church with a vision — large enough to provide an active, well-balanced program for every age and need, yet interested in you personally. RENTON ' 44in EXIT S m � I.�os NE,orh ' ; 1 y� Community g°� Chounity urch Church E""' M M MIIrI W IFe lipM1lvMf lake Exit 5 from 1-405. Follow Sunset Blvd. up the hill to NE 10th.Turn Right on NE 10th, head 1 block east and you're there. Parking available from 10th or Kirkland Ave. 3031 Northeast Tenth Street Renton, Washington 98056 alien Amandus, Senior Pastor (206) 255-4751 Services at 8:00, 9:15, and 11:00 AM Law Offices • HILLIS CLARK MARTIN & PETERSON ■ A Professional Service Corporation 500 Galland Building,1221 Second Avenue Seattle,Washington 98101-2925 (206)623-1745 Facsimile(206)623-7789 EXHIBIT .Pr .... __ .� ,. February 20, 1992 HAND DELIVERED Mr. Fred Kaufman City of Renton Hearing Examiner Council Chambers City Hall Renton, Washington 98055 Re: Highlands Community Church Proposed Addition Renton File Nos. CU; ECF; R-048-90 Dear Mr. Examiner: We represent Highlands Community Church, whose rezone and conditional use permit applications are presently before the City of Renton. During the February 4, 1992, public hearing on the Church's applications, you raised certain questions regarding the proposed rezone. In addition, concerns were expressed with respect to the number and proximity of the churches in the area surrounding Highlands Community Church. The purpose of this letter is to respond to these issues. I. Rezone Request As you know, Highlands Community Church seeks a rezone of a portion of its Renton property from the R-1 Residential Zone to the P-i Public Zone. During the February 4 hearing you questioned the need for this rezone in light of the fact that churches are conditional uses in both districts. See Renton City Code ("RCC") §§ 4-31-6 (B) (3) (a) ; 4-31-9 (B) (3) (g) . As already demonstrated by City staff and by the applicant, the proposed rezone satisfies all city and state requirements for such applications. The conditions set forth in RCC § 4-8-14 (C) are met, and the Parkridge test of substantially changed conditions is satisfied. See Parkridge v. Seattle, 89 Wn.2d 454, 464, 573 P. 2d 359 (1978) . Furthermore, numerous other provisions of state law and the Renton City Code and Comprehensive Plan strongly support the requested rezone. t t Mr. Fred Kaufman February 20, 1992 Page 2 A. The Policies of the Renton City Code and Comprehensive Plan Support This Rezone Request. The Highlands Community Church property under consideration is designated "Public/Quasi-Public" in the City of Renton Comprehensive Plan. This designation is specifically intended "for publicly owned and certain privately owned uses, including utilities, hospitals, other health care facilities, churches, clubs, schools, non-profit institutions, airports and government buildings. . . . " City of Renton Comprehensive Plan, p. 29 (emphasis added) . Because residential uses are not encouraged under this Plan designation, R-1 is not an appropriate zone for the property. This conclusion is supported by the text of the city code. The zoning code's description of the R-1 zone states that this designation has been "established for low density single family residential dwellings. . . . This zoning classification may be permitted in an area designated as single family residential in the comprehensive plan. " RCC § 4-31-5 (A) . Thus, the R-1 zone is specifically intended for those areas designated as residential in the Comprehensive Plan. The Highlands Community Church property is not so designated. By contrast, the zoning code specifically states that the P-1 zone "is established to provide and protect suitable environments for social and physical services and facilities. This zoning classification is generally limited to areas designated as public/quasi-public in the comprehensive plan. " RCC § 4-31-9 (A) . As noted above, Public/Quasi-Public is the Plan designation of the subject property. Accordingly, under the City's Comprehensive Plan and zoning code, P-i is the appropriate zoning ,classification for the portion of the Highlands Community Church property, not R-1. For this reason alone, the requested rezone should be granted. B. Washington State Law Strongly Encourages Zoning Property in Accordance with Its Comprehensive Plan Designation. Besides the independent support of Renton's Comprehensive Plan and zoning code, the Highlands Community Church rezone request is consistent with and encouraged by applicable state law. Although zoning ordinances have not historically been void for failure to comply totally with a comprehensive plan, see Barrie v. Kitsap County, 93 Wn.2d 843, 613 P.2d 1148 (1980) , the comprehensive plan is nonetheless expected to provide a guide to Mr. Fred Kaufman February 20, 1992 Page 3 the adoption of implementing zoning regulations. See State ex rel. Standard Mining & Development Corp. v. Auburn, 82 Wn.2d 321, 510 P.2d 647 (1973) . Thus, Washington courts have encouraged zoning property in accordance with its comprehensive plan designation. The Optional Municipal Code further supports the doctrine that property should be zoned in conformance with an applicable comprehensive plan. After adoption of a comprehensive plan, the Optional Municipal Code authorizes code cities such as Renton to enact zoning ordinances, RCW 35A. 63 . 100(2) , along with "such other matters as may be otherwise required by law or as the legislative body may deem necessary or appropriate to effectuate the goals and objectives of the comprehensive plan or parts thereof and the purposes of this chapter. " RCW 35A. 63. 100 (5) (emphasis added) . The Code thus envisions zoning as a tool to implement the comprehensive plan. Where, as here, a property's zoning is in direct conflict with its plan designation, this policy is clearly not met. Finally, the Growth Management Act supports the requested rezone. The Act was enacted in 1990 and 1991 to address growth pressures experienced by many areas of the State. As part of King County, Renton is required to adopt a comprehensive plan under the Act by July 1, 1993. Within one year of adopting plans, cities and counties must enact development regulations "that are consistent with and implement the comprehensive plan. These counties and cities shall perform their activities and make capital budget decisions in conformity; with their comprehensive plans. " RCW 36.70A. 120. The Act defines "development regulations" to include zoning ordinances. RCW 36.70A. 030 (7) . Under the Growth Management Act, then, Renton's zoning ordinance must be brought into conformance with its comprehensive plan not later than July 1, 1994. This rezone will further that requirement. In summary, the Highlands Community Church rezone request will bring the subject property into conformance with its comprehensive plan designation. All applicable City and state regulations and policies support approval of the application. II. Locations of Adjacent Churches One of the Renton City Code's requirements for issuance of a conditional use permit is that "the proposed location shall not result in either the detrimental over concentration of a Mr. Fred Kaufman February 20, 1992 Page 4 particular use within the City or within the area of the proposed use. " RCC § 4-31-36(C) (2) (a) . The applicant has measured the driving distances between Highlands Community Church and other area churches. These are as follows: Driving Distance from Church Highlands Community Church Bethlehem Lutheran Church: .23 miles Seventh Day Adventist: .23 miles Latter Day Saints: . 35 miles Calvary Baptist Church: .40 miles St. Andrew's Presbyterian: .40 miles Church of Christ: .50 miles East Renton Baptist: .70 miles St. Matthew's Lutheran: .80 miles Thus, there are only two churches within 1/4 mile of the Highlands Community Church site, and these just barely. All other area churches are at increasing distances. There will be no overconcentration of this use in the area or in the City. Thus, to the extent this requirement can be applied to a church's application for a conditional use permit, in light of the First Amendment, it is satisfied. III. Constitutional Issues While we maintain that the proposed addition to Highlands Community Church will not result in an overconcentration of churches in the area or the City, we also note that denying a permit for a church use based on the proximity of other churches could violate the free exercise clause of the First Amendment. A decision on the Highlands Community Church conditional use permit application should therefore be made without regard to the locations of other churches. An instructive case in this regard is Sumner v. First Baptist Church of Sumner, 97 Wn.2d 1, 639 P.2d 1358 (1982) . In Sumner, the city sought to enjoin a church's use of its basement as a church school, the Washington Christian Academy. The city claimed that (a) the school violated its zoning ordinance because the church had not obtained a special use permit for its operation; (b) applicable off-street parking requirements were not met; and (c) the facility failed to meet city building code standards for educational structures. The trial court held for Mr. Fred Kaufman , February 20, 1992 Page 5 the city, temporarily enjoining use of the building for school purposes. Our Supreme Court reversed, concluding that the case presented a conflict between the fundamental right of the church members to send their children to a church-operated school and the city's exercise' of its police power. This was because strict application ,of the city's regulations would indirectly affect the protected right: " [A]lthough there is no fundamental tenet against compliance with building codes or zoning ordinances, the practical effect of their uncompromising enforcement would be to close down the church-operated school. This would deny to church members the right to guide the education of their children by sending them to their church-operated school, a fundamental and constitutionally protected right. " Sumner, 97 Wn.2d at 7. The Court stated that its function in situations such as this, where two legitimate and substantial interests collide, "is to balance the interests of the parties and, if an accommodation cannot be effected, determine which interest must yield. " Id. at 8, citations omitted. Where the enforceability of government regulations is at stake, the Court concluded that such regulations will be enforced against religious schools when the State proves that the specific concerns addressed by the regulations are of sufficient magnitude to outweigh the free exercise claim, that the nonapplication of the regulations will threaten the public's health or other vital interests, and that the State's interest could not otherwise be satisfied in a way which would not infringe on religious liberty. State v. Whisner, 47 Ohio St. 2d 181, 351 N.E.2d 750 (1976) . This test ferrets out those facially neutral regulations that have an unnecessarily debilitating effect on religion. Sumner, 97 Wn.2d at 9. Because the trial court record did not contain adequate information to permit application of this test, the Supreme Court remanded the case for further consideration. The Court's reasoning in Sumner applies with equal force here. Highlands Community Church is seeking to build an addition for the specific purpose of providing Christian education to the children of its members. Denying the proposal on the grounds of the church's proximity to other religious institutions would prevent construction of the education center, thereby denying to Mr. Fred Kaufman February 20, 1992 Page 6 church members the right to guide the education of their children. This would create a direct conflict between Renton's exercise of its police power and the fundamental rights of the church's congregation. In the present context, it is most unlikely that the City could satisfy the test set forth in Sumner for enforcement of its regulations, if for no other reason than that their nonenforcement will in no way "threaten the public's health or other vital interests. " The mere proximity of other churches to Highlands Community Church constitutes no threat to the public health, or to any other identifiable interest. Thus, this proposal should not be denied due to the presence of other churches in the area of Highlands Community Church. As the Sumner court noted, " [w]hen the City, in the exercise of its police power, is confronted with rights protected by the First Amendment, it should not be uncompromising and rigid. Rather, it should approach the problem with flexibility. There should be some play in the joints of both the zoning ordinance and the building code. " Id. at 10. IV. Conclusion Highlands Community Church is seeking to provide a much- needed educational facility to its members. ; The church must satisfy a broad array of requirements in order for the City of Renton to approve its conditional use permit and rezone applications. The City staff report and the testimony submitted at the February 4 hearing on this matter show that all such requirements have been met. The mere fact that a church is a conditional use in both the existing and the requested zones should not lead to denial of the rezone request, particularly when the rezone will eliminate a nonconformity with the Comprehensive Plan. In addition, the conditional use permit application should not be judged in relation to the proximity of other area churches. ru Richard R. Wilson cc: Highlands Community Church Mr. Mark Pywell, City of Renton Department of Planning 3 1 1 8 1 9 . . ,, - T---- i-i 14 144.117.)ps comPlom cry CRcti 0 Tii 134 .411.i 4 i...017,4466001 - --..,- r , 3 on/ DA-Y . .. 4. • i ....• t. P. .4041; .• . ' a, a" ' %•-• ; F." r i^'S4' ' •,a,: , a r' Vid, 4111Frarfa---a"."ow lidr-" 7" * • } • rr, ' • . ....7444-A.r- * "...r. V \ ii,i:tRV14A-14/10.^.1V, - - - a ,iff 1 Mt*.‘ 11115''• '' lt44' 1*' - tr) ; 6 geFr ° ity 14 6, . '1' ; / ill T . r• *er, 1 ' ' 4r ,.. • le ..L. , • , — .. Lt- YAi:44 i Ni 61 4-`)I- 5. ..‘:t4 . , r•-(2,C)fri 2-1e.A.4k.)i) Atir me- 1 ., . ±'. - , .. • ...... . cit . .. ,...._ - - - 14-'---- .r... la A ‘ :;:14' -.1 afsi'"- , -- ' ffii.1--..-- , .. As \-,!.,..., v 4 -It . — hvic 5 NoT „,,--• aii...- rhg4eP IIP, - - . la I • -1 ,-, .••••'''- ...,-- .,,,, , / N, ---• ' $ 4 '.7., 1 i / . WIPP 1 puLL ?Aizrit4 cm kyr ,- FZ6?" ,...... 1661\ . .. KieKLA-op A VC 1•4:-.1 , . ,ili,-..- „,,,,,, , .--- op doll .t ,I1' 4 '4 * 11161*-•-..-elair-.. .I, •!.1**.40,641 *' .4:1 4 P'l ' -"""i L' -- ..., ..A:! r.aiirje. ( _ . . , • , . _ ,r 44 rJ t 11 4 .......r.i ...6 7 .: No. v t .......... FULL ?Avg:1),,i6 14)T -// 1 4p i . 4 MP' ' • NE c-ttli.si . . _ ... . . • -.-.1.- , ...1.k , • 1-i i4 0 kithlp 5 OM Fl 0 ki cr y Cik)2c-1-1 _ ie NScore-t F',. . .0 \14 L.cir I1 Ai P,4-y i .7 2 ''- 4:•-• . . , i **- '"VI • • - ..-- . - .4•:- '''''''"°' - — -Aar-•e• • .46, ,....‘'d,11•1` 1 -S. -- i.w7".. , ....4 -• !....1.1 .‘, • . 1 Jedi- 44#' le... r i•"11' ' .. . 1.4" Ofhliffilliii. ' ;a11111.4 d t• ''' ' ; * "° • 2. • ., ., , . • VI XHIBIT ,e....................• ....,.................., iI 11,e, . 1 NI C 0 ) if- 6 171 -- ,?O _ oi i ,i. •;. .''-` . , * • , / 4 ‘'.t„ Iii I..; ;:n.,:,,z) , '• AK" ' ' , :',;if_ .,.. ••,, * ii• . '......?' it . ' ..,:l *-, •,. - ,it v .: -e .- • n•,,,,‘ . 1 i 1 : t)1.-t.• "Al'a t NA cl. i-tr 5E,zEw . eaorsi iialeA.A-7,))..) AVr I•I e \ . 1. 1 . • • - .• cmcs Nor 111113111.11111K- ' -_ -.maw ...,- 161 srft I-4-6 ....., , / ,-- • , I ---- 0 - , - ---"-- `,.. /1 I ,./- . • \: FULL S'AVriki6, /,4.).r „screw FRA.,,kl icK 4.40p AV e Ni 6 . . , r-•": ..,Hw 11 1 1 +,1„0,4*.tabio A •. : "r"-" 'IrruPgr... 4 _ 711P71 r ,..-- .._ - ._• . ___ ___,_ _ . . 4i . _ 1 ' 4eCt•i raom NE citk- 7,I fir EXHIBIT N , 3 33 frEyr Tyr, co) gs;?_Ove_ xo PETITION BY NEIGHBORS OF THE HIGHLAND'S COMMUNITY CHURCH OPPOSING REZONE OF BLOCK 32 To: The Hearing Examiner, City of Renton: The City Council, City of Renton: • We neighbors of the Highland's Community Church oppose any change to Block 32 zoning. The • Church is located by conditional use permit at 3031 N.E. 10th• Street (block 32) of Renton in an area zoned R-1 residential. Applicant seeks to rezone Block 32 from R-1 to a P-1 . As affected neighbors, we seek relief from applicant's proposal to rezone Block 32 and to expand (11900 square feet) the dominant structure in the neighborhood. RENTON CODE (SECTIONS/PARAGRAPHS) THAT FORM THE BASIS FOR RELIEF. SOUGHT 4-31-5:A: Purpose: The Residential Zone (R-1) is established for low density single family dwellings. It is further intended to prohibit the development of incompatible uses that are detrimental to the residential environment. 4-3-2:C: The plan is, of necessity, general in its proposals. It must be flexible, since it is impossible to predict all future events which may affect the community. The plan is not a development ordinance, although it makes significant recommendations for future land use. The plan is not precise. It does not present engineering accuracy, nor does it claim to predict exactly the future of every parcel of property, or insure that growth is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. It is not intended to retroactively impose compliance with goals , objectives, and policies upon +fisting developed property, but voluntary compliance is encouraged. PRECEDENT FOR SELECTIVE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN IMPLEMENTATION Applicant's rezone application is selective in compliance with the Comprehensive Plan. Documentation is available indicating that the City Staff supports this interpretation. Reference City of Renton memo dated March 14,1990. OBJECTIONS BY AGGRIEVED NEIGHBORS We live in close proximity to applicant's church . Consequently, we experience first hand the adverse effects of applicant's enterprise-level-church-activities upon the enjoyment, comfort, and convenience of our property. More expansion would only bring more attrition of our property rights. We object to a rezone from R-1 to P-1 because rezone would allow the Church's escape from residential zone regulation (4-31-5:A) . We need that protection. And further, when compared to R-1 , P-1 zoning includes relaxed developmental standards for building height and lot coverage. Since applicant has already announced plans for a new 1500 seat sanctuary (location of choice, Block 32) , a rezone to P-1 would develop the threat that the new sanctuary would be sited on Block 32. Truly, a location that would be a detriment to the adjacent residents due to size and closeness. Applicant justifies the rezone on the basis of Comprehensive Plan compliance. With City Staff concurrence (reference City of Renton Memo dated March 14,1990) , the westerly portion of Church land is excluded from the rezone application. We neighbors contend that applicants compliance is made on a selective basis. To be consistent, we neighbors demand the same exclusionary rights from Comprehensive Plan compliance. However, we seek an opposite position. A position leaving Block 32 zoning as it is. Clearly, a position that is allowed by 4-3-2:C: . As adjacent neighbors, we seek assurances that the residential character of our neighborhood will be preserved. We seek to coexist with a residential scale Highland's Community Church while enjoying the comfort and convenience of our residential property. RELIEF SOUGHT We request that the Hearing Examiner recommend against granting the rezone. We ask that the City Council concur and finalize the denial for rezone. A denial would preserve the residential character of our neighborhood. Such action would allow the adjacent neighbors to coexist with the Church without further attrition of their property rights. PRINTED NAME I SIGNATURE I ADDRESS I ZIP CODE I DATE t /f/Gte✓R.Rai_v'Ai ----- --��-�/ ? c 3 7 L,voL-x C ry E. ing�.-,TG Z/‘- Z 2. 4a /9:29 A- 2 iChiea t zeleazCL, SS2 ,7e -- 9g o2-/4 f, 3. • 4. ------•- --_-------•------ _._____ __.__________.__. -_-- --_-`- 6. 7. L. 9. 10. PETITION BY THE NEIGHBORS OPPOSING EXPANSION OF THE HIGHLAND'S COMMUNITY CHURCH To: The Hearing Examiner, City of 'Renton:. We neighbors of the Highland's Community Church oppose granting a conditional use permit for an expanded church. Applicant's Church is located at 3031 N.E.10th Street in a district zoned R-1. As neighbors, we seek relief from the detrimental effects of the proposal to expand by 11900 square feet the predominant structure in the neighborhood. RENTON ZONING CODE SECTIONS/PARAGRAPHS THAT FORM THE BASIS FOR RELIEF SOUGHT 4-31-5:A: Purpose: The Residential Zone (R-1) is established for low density single family dwellings. It is further intended to prohibit the development of incompatible uses that are detrimental to the residential environment. 4-31-36:A: Purpose: The purpose of the conditional use permit is to allow certain uses in districts from which they are normally prohibited by this Chapter when the proposed uses are deemed consistent with other existing and potential use within the general area of the proposed use. Except as provided in this Section, a conditional use permit may not reduce the requirements of the zone in which the use is located. 4-31-36:B: Conditional Use Permit: The Hearing Examiner may grant, with or without conditions, or deny .the. conditional use permit pursuant to Chapter 8, Title IV of the City Code. The Hearing Examiner may limit the term and duration of the conditional use permit. Conditions imposed by the Hearing Examiner shall reasonably assure that nuisance or hazard to life or property will not develop. 4-31-36:C:2 Community Need: There shall be a community need for the proposed use at the proposed ,location. In determination of community need the Hearing Examiner shall consider the following factors, among other relevant information: a. The proposed location shall not result in either the detrimental over concentration of a particular use within the City or within the immediate area of the proposed use. 4-31-36:C:4 Compatibility: The proposed use shall be compatible with the residential scale and character of the neighborhood. DECLARATIONS BY AGGRIEVED NEIGHBORS We oppose applicant's request to expand his facility because we live close to applicant's church and experience adverse effects from applicant's enterprise level activities upon the enjoyment, comfort, and convenience of our property, 4-31-36:A: . Enough is enough. The proposed expansion together with applicant's objective to be the regions "equipping" and "sending" organization produce a use incompatible with the residential scale and character of our neighborhood, 4-31-36:C:4. With more space, larger Christian Crusades will 'most likely result bringing with them a "Kingdome" atmosphere to the neighborhood, 4-31-36:B: . In the obscure use of the added class room capacity, we see a latent threat that a formal Christian School is planned later (the church already has two school busses) . Then, to top it off, we are faced with the already announced plans for a new 1500 seat sanctuary as well as the conversion of the old sanctuary to more class rooms. It is applicant's conjecture that the community benefits from the planned expansion, however, we see the opposite as the case. For with expansion, comes increased noise and dust at all hours as well as overflow street parking and traffic congestion. Inherent conditions that are detrimental to the neighborhood residential quality, 4-31-5:A: . We see very few people in the neighborhood attend the Church, consequently, the expansion doesn't serve the neighborhood at all, 4-31-36:C:2. We conclude that the expanded facility is to be filled through "aggressive outreach" beyond the immediate niighborhood and community at a cost of property rights attrition for Church neighbors, 4-31-36:B. We object. We citizens of the Renton Highlands community point out that within the Highlands area 17 churches offer services for their followers. In the locale of the Highland's Community Church, there are seven churches within walking distance. Any expansion would further inbalance an inured over concentrated condition that already exists, 4-31-36:C:2.a. RELIEF SOUGHT We request that the Hearing Examiner deny the conditional use permit for this expansion. The action would preserve the integrity of our neighborhood so that we adjacent neighbors could coexist with the Church without further attrition of our property rights. PRINTED NAME I SIGNATURE I ADDRESS I ZIP CODE I DATE 1.efi-ev_ I,,t G/1Ae f0,c, a - % %� ,� --- '37 z.�d�X C Tti c 9z • 2. /Q. ,e i64‘4' 4/ ---_ - - �_ _z �_ G� 9 O51' 3-_alCACe„..4_atharChil DAVI) y., J. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 77 3T 1 IT . � . - ,-e-I„ ., ._ ,, ,,-, 60 , n_0(17,cp-- re PETITION BY THE NEIGHBORS OPPOSING EXPANSION OF �TFiE H" GHLAND'''S"6OM'MU'NITY CHURtW To: The Hearing Examiner, City of Renton: • We neighbors of the Highland's Community Church oppose granting a conditional use permit for an expanded church. Applicant's Church is located at 3031 N.E.10th Street in a district zoned R-1. As neighbors, we seek relief from the detrimental effects of the proposal to expand by 11900 square feet the predominant structure in the neighborhood. RENTON ZONING CODE SECTIONS/PARAGRAPHS THAT FORM THE BASIS FOR RELIEF SOUGHT 4-31-5:A: Purpose: The Residential Zone (R-1) is established for low density single family dwellings. It is further intended to prohibit the development of incompatible uses that are detrimental to the residential environment. 4-31-36:A: Purpose: The purpose of the conditional use permit is to allow certain uses in districts from which they are normally prohibited by this Chapter when the proposed uses are deemed consistent with other existing and potential use within the .general area of the proposed use. Except as provided in this• Section, a conditional use permit may not reduce the requirements of the zone in which the use is located. 4-31-36:B: Conditional Use Permit: The Hearing Examiner may grant, with or without conditions, or deny the conditional use permit pursuant to Chapter 8, Title IV of the City Code. The Hearing Examiner may limit the term and duration of the conditional use permit. Conditions imposed by the Hearing Examiner shall reasonably assure that nuisance or hazard to life or property will not develop. • 4-31-36:C:2 Community Need: There shall be a community need for the proposed use at the proposed location. In determination of community need the Hearing Examiner shall consider the following factors, among other relevant information: a. The proposed location shall not result in either the detrimental over concentration of a particular use within the City or within the immediate area of the proposed use. 4-31-36:C:4 Compatibility: The proposed use shall be compatible with the residential scale and character of the neighborhood. DECLARATIONS BY AGGRIEVED NEIGHBORS We oppose applicant's request to expand his facility because we live close to applicant's church and experience adverse effects from applicant's enterprise level activities upon the enjoyment, comfort, and convenience of our property, 4-31-36:A: . Enough is enough. The proposed expansion together with applicant's objective to be the regions "equipping" and "sending" organization produce a use incompatible with the residential scale and character of our neighborhood, 4-31-36:C:4. With more space, larger Christian Crusades will most likely result bringing with them a "Kingdome" atmosphere to the neighborhood, 4-31-36:B: . In the obscure use of the added class room capacity, we see a latent threat that a formal Christian School is planned later (the church already has two school busses) . Then, to top it off, we are faced with the already announced plans for ,a new 1500 seat sanctuary as well as the conversion of the old sanctuary to more class rooms. i It is applicant's conjecture that the community benefits from the planned expansion, however, we see the opposite as the case. For with expansion, comes increased noise and dust at all hours as well as overflow street parking and traffic cpngestion. Inherent conditions that are detrimental to the neighborhood residential quality, 4-31-5:A: . We see very few people in the neighborhood attend the Church, consequently, the expansion doesn't serve the neighborhood at all, 4-31-36:C:2. We conclude that the expanded facility is to be filled through "aggressive outreach" beyond the immediate neighborhood and community at a cost of property rights attrition for Church neighbors, 4-31-36:B. We object. We citizens of the Renton Highlands community point out that within the Highlands area 17 churches offer services for their followers. In the locale of the Highland's Community Church, there are seven churches within walking distance. Any expansion would further inbalance an inured over concentrated condition that already exists, 4-31-36:C:2.a. RELIEF SOUGHT We request that the Hearing Examiner deny the conditional use permit for this expansion. The action would preserve the integrity of our neighborhood so that we adjacent neighbors could coexist with the Church without further attrition of our property rights. . PRINTED NAME I SIGNATURE I ADDRESS I ZIP CODE I DATE ?G Si. . g.fI___. . .!Gke.4/4-----______ .3,90�_4--- s--8-91 2. G /s.e a e�._-_ -....__. . r..i z3d144,__ ___.___._ t _�.. . .,,,2 },-4, e,re go. 6 b -2- 1/ . 3'. 001r-l S 1(4 k PA-CUej 046-1-1- 4-1 M. 9e i a54 ,,,,,,,,,,_,„,,, a,,,,im ,gas6 S-E 1/ zi.. ,r7-A,,DA- _,Y 4._A ibi-G ) JR_ _A---a________ _ ___.___._______. .. , _f_o_e_.. .. _.).t/a..t_4_d_-4.g.4.-. ..A7.:,_.e.,_ _2:e.2_5...-.A___ 1::-..e.7-2/ 5•_� � s S GC- 1 Jac�t'cz 17 ! �iL �[.( ,t 'J9 -. �C r)% 2_," 6/."" C o5 6. i_/} a../=_-T-/�'i,1-.!(�.61_ .�c . .�...e... e f-.2_ ''G/-/l€`. !,S'z sz- _��- r�77 -•-------•- � .�___ ...__.__ ...._.__.._---.--._-.. ram_ -a .. _. �._ 7. 37- l2 C. a .62.C ' --7jf-t'u . .67,4--"(---- _/ . .`7 .:_-_.'.2..T. ... ..›:_e.__ _.j_i--44-..e•_5---.F-9/ .0 8'--g-A--k- --16D-a-h/4111/7101 --- ---6ille .._4_... . _.„, 723 v .atole ceizsx s=s -r, 1,4- "A% P' 1-la iv mLk b.-ii-E---/eat-Z_WILf. me.- !I-0. _. 9 .6(.. l ,•L -:_ ._..r1. 2.•!! G'.1/L s." '-.•__ Pfri..l'u°�'� ..._..aAX -) - -....5(7o. "... `?.-r -�-) PETITION BY THE NEIGHBORS OPPOSING EXPANSION OF THE HIGHLAND'S COMMUNITY CHURCH To: The Hearing Examiner, City of Renton: We neighbors of the Highland's Community Church oppose granting a conditional use permit for an expanded church. Applicant's Church is located at 3031 N.E.10th Street in a district zoned R-1. As neighbors, we seek relief from the detrimental effects of the proposal to expand by 11900 square feet the predominant structure in the neighborhood. RENTON ZONING CODE SECTIONS/PARAGRAPHS THAT FORM THE BASIS FOR RELIEF SOUGHT 4-31-5:A: Purpose: The Residential Zone (R-1) is established for low density single family dwellings. It is further intended to prohibit the development of incompatible uses that are detrimental to the residential environment. 0 4-31-36:A: Purpose: The purpose of the conditional use permit is to allow certain uses in districts from which they are normally prohibited by this Chapter when the proposed uses are deemed consistent with other existing and potential use within the general area of the proposed use. Except as provided in this Section, a conditional use permit may not reduce the requirements of the zone in which the use is located. 4-31-36:B: Conditional Use Permit: The Hearing Examiner may grant, with or without conditions, or deny the conditional use permit pursuant to Chapter 8, Title IV of the City Code. The Hearing Examiner may limit the term and dtiration of the conditional use permit. Conditions imposed by the Hearing Examiner shall reasonably assure that nuisance or hazard to life or property will not develop. 4-31-36:C:2 Community Need: There shall be a community need for the proposed use at the proposed location. In determination of community need the Hearing Examiner shall consider the following factors, among other relevant information: a. The proposed location shall not result in either the detrimental over concentration of a particular use within the City or within the immediate area of the proposed use. 4-31-36:C:4 Compatibility: The proposed use shall be compatible with the residential scale and character of the neighborhood. DECLARATIONS BY AGGRIEVED NEIGHBORS We oppose applicant's request to expand his facility because we live close to applicant's church and experience adverse effects from applicant's enterprise level activities upon the enjoyment, comfort, and convenience of our property, 4-31-36:A: . Enough is enough. The proposed expansion together with applicant's objective to be the regions "equipping" and "sending" organization produce a use incompatible with the residential scale and character of our neighborhood, 4-31-36:C:4. With more space, larger Christian Crusades will most likely result bringing with them a "Kinadome" atmosphere to the neighborhood, 4-31-36:B: . In the obscure use of the added class room capacity, we see a latent threat that a formal Christian School is planned later (the church already has two school busses) . Then, to top it off. we are faced with the already announced plans for a new 1500 seat sanctuary as well as the conversion of the old sanctuary to more class rooms. It is applicant's conjecture that the community benefits from the planned expansion, however, we see the opposite as the case. For with expansion, comes increased noise and dust at all hours as well as overflow street parking and traffic congestion. Inherent conditions that are detrimental to the neighborhood residential quality, 4-31-5:A: . We see very few people in the neighborhood attend the Church, consequently, the expansion doesn't serve the neighborhood at all, 4-31-36:C:2. We •conclude that the expanded facility is to be filled through "aggressive outreach" beyond the immediate neighborhood and community at a cost of property rights attrition for Church neighbors, 4-31-36:B. We object. We citizens of the Renton Highlands community point out that within the Highlands area 17 churches offer services for their followers. In the locale of the Highland's Community Church, there are seven churches within walking distance. Any expansion would further inbalance an inured over concentrated condition that already exists, 4-31-36:C:2.a. RELIEF SOUGHT We request that the Hearing Examiner deny the conditional use permit for this expansion. The action would preserve j the integrity of our neighborhood so that we adjacent neighbors could coexist with the Church without further attrition of our property rights. PRINTED NAME I SIGNATURE I ADDRESS I ZIP CODE I DATE 1-____LIZA__iYA__d_r_ ,0_______ _ _ . le1,2)-n il _ qi/4 i ,itut loilif rects6 . , 6-Atv 2. 4)..ii.J.60___/11144,04.11 _(24).14__________ rcilvi-- 0)!4 . 6 3 9 Z. y_kvitz_i.a.._m_d..Av_e_.Aill.__.2.4_051a spicil ry f( Lr 11 4•'±.1.17 s; ,.0.L.4 - L , -`1rt-fit_ C.p...111/ 1 - _1.1.Af 1 tyd g-.o 6 (A,1101/A0-11-71-71_ AL _go.5-6 47,1 .• /24-Y/10 A/2)j apegg....0 4,--~-4 42...w• Ooe, cf-em--a-A-e-ee is/,/_-_-_- I F1.0\i- 0 - g- .-( 6. _. .. 111..4_1 of-Lt-.L k NAY_... 7 o 91 V.-Z.vk v "- \ 1 n o�.V vl( `' ' `." Y.,( \ .e-e-,.,--„_. y 1-._ A v}-v� c:9 A 5 6 S!S / ) B. C-4R 15 t2 ±6-G A5(7 S at A c..v..-[- - - er344..-..z_ /✓Ap. ✓ora q c2 /I/.t 78d' '(, 8 / 2� 9. _----._ --�/41....__.��c G��2. _....-_.._ �-' _.._._...._............-._.(- ._......- -/_"''.._.._..... `?�-��1.... ...)1wc.i j,,l.._.._Y-'....._ i7 J N. ....?2`3 S---6_..... VP.. i.O. J e f? 6-,-6-en iceL-_..P—Itiul-e-L .-c_? _1_..y._atr o nd, „P Alc ,Fo56 6...6/ C3 PETITION BY THE NEIGHBORS OPPOSING EXPANSION OF THE HIGHLAND'S COMMUNITY CHURCH To: The Hearing Examiner, City of Renton: . We neighbors of the Highland's Community Church oppose granting a conditional use permit for an expanded church. Applicant's Church is located at 3031 N.E.10th Street in a district zoned R-1. As neighbors, we seek relief from the detrimental effects of the proposal to expand by 11900 square feet the predominant structure in the neighborhood. RENTON ZONING CODE SECTIONS/PARAGRAPHS THAT FORM THE BASIS FOR RELIEF SOUGHT 4-31-5:A: Purpose: The Residential Zone (R-1) is established for low density single family dwellings. It is further intended to prohibit the development of incompatible uses that are detrimental to the residential environment. 4-31-36:A: Purpose: The purpose of the conditional use permit is to allow certain uses in districts from which they are normally prohibited by this Chapter when the proposed uses are deemed consistent with other existing and potential use within the general area of the proposed use. Except as provided in this Section, a conditional use permit may not reduce the requirements of the zone in which the use is located. 4-31-36:B: Conditional Use Permit: The Hearing Examiner may grant, with or without conditions, or deny the conditional use permit pursuant to Chapter 8, Title IV of the City Code. The Hearing Examiner may limit the term and duration of the conditional use permit. Conditions imposed by the Hearing Examiner shall reasonably assure that nuisance or hazard to life or property will not develop. 4-31-36:C:2 Community Need: There shall be a community need for the proposed use at the proposed location. In determination of community need the Hearing Examiner shall consider the following factors, among other relevant information: a. The proposed location shall not result in either the detrimental over concentration of a particular use within the City or within the immediate area of the proposed use. 4-31-36:C:4 Compatibility: The proposed use shall be compatible with the residential scale and character of the neighborhood. DECLARATIONS BY AGGRIEVED NEIGHBORS We oppose applicant's request to expand his facility because we live close to applicant's church and experience adverse effects from applicant's enterprise level activities upon the enjoyment, comfort, and convenience of our properrty, 4-31-36:A: . Enough is enough. The proposed expansion together with applicant's objective to be the regions "equipping" and "sending" organization produce a use incompatible with the residential scale and character of our neighborhood, 4-31-36:C:4. With more space, larger Christian Crusades will most likely result bringing with them a "Kingdome" atmosphere to the neighborhood, 4-31-36:B: . In the obscure use of the added class room capacity, we see a latent threat that a formal Christian School is planned later (the church already has two school busses) . Then, to top it off, we are faced with the already announced plans for a new 1500 seat sanctuary as well as the conversion of the old sanctuary to more class rooms. It is, applicant's conjecture that the community benefits from the planned expansion, however, we see the opposite as the case. For with expansion, comes increased noise and dust at all hours as well as overflow street parking and traffic congestion. Inherent conditions that are detrimental to the neighborhood residential quality, 4-31-5:A: . We see very few people in the neighborhood attend the Church, consequently, the expansion doesn't serve the neighborhood at all, 4-31-36:C:2. We conclude that the expanded facility is to be filled through "aggressive outreach" beyond the immediate neighborhood and community at a cost of property rights attrition for Church neighbors, 4-31-36:B. We object. We citizens of the Renton Highlands community point out that within the Highlands area 17 churches offer services for their followers. In the locale of the Highland's Community Church, there are seven churches within walking distance. Any' expansion would further inbalance an inured over concentrated condition that already exists, 4-31-36:C:2.a. i2ELIEF SOUGHT We request that the Hearing Examiner deny the conditional use permit for this expansion. The action would preserve the integrity of our neighborhood so that we adjacent neighbors could coexist with the Church without further attrition of our property rights. PRINTED NAME I SIGNATURE I ADDRESS I ZIP CODE I DATE rJI ) JC v n.! 2. %.,kic-i/CLAii.71-741 tji :L 717 LI 3. _ 2G �(.7..-/C-i !r/fit E/_e-C: c, 4- �� lA l' i . , �. . �� 3 F/ 5...L..ely.i46:_x_Ti_a_ezzA 13301,71, _�'_._ .._ 7. ,_..._.... v o5 6- __1_�12444 _.._LI A 'cam_ 1�t uG `%� Lrr-?:/�'/C 14 ; 02_ - 41)._t )fr 8._ 6_6C __.: (J Cif ...___. _....-_. ... car . . ...._ _ vriet . 4-114,00ct qgoe-E., s/Vq( ei( a-C S-47,4/ C4 PETITION BY THE NEIGHBORS OPPOSING EXPANSION OF THE HIGHLAND'S COMMUNITY CHURCH To: The Hearing Examiner, City of Renton: We neighbors of the Highland's Community Church oppose granting a conditional use permit for an expanded church. Applicant's Church is located at 3031 N.E.10th Street in a district zoned R-1. As neighbors, we seek relief from the detrimental effects of the proposal to expand by 11900 square feet the predominant structure in the neighborhood. RENTON ZONING CODE SECTIONS/PARAGRAPHS THAT FORM THE BASIS FOR RELIEF SOUGHT 4-31-5:A: Purpose: The Residential Zone (R-1) is established for low density single family dwellings. It is further intended to prohibit the development of incompatible uses that are detrimental to the residential environment. 4-31-36:A: Purpose: The purpose of the conditional use permit is to allow certain uses in districts from which they are normally prohibited by this Chapter when the proposed uses are deemed consistent with other existing and potential use within the general area of the proposed use. Except as provided in this Section, a conditional use permit may not reduce the requirements of the zone in which the use is located. 4-31-36:B: Conditional Use Permit: The Hearing Examiner may grant, with or without conditions, or deny the conditional use permit pursuant to Chapter 8, Title IV of the City Code. The Hearing Examiner may limit the term and duration of the conditional use permit. Conditions imposed by the Hearing Examiner shall reasonably assure that nuisance or hazard to life or property will not develop. 4-31-36:C:2 Community Need: There shall be a community need for the proposed use at the proposed location. In determination of community need the Hearing Examiner shall consider the following factors, among other relevant information: a. The proposed location shall not result in either the detrimental over concentration of a particular use within the City or within the immediate area of the proposed use. 4-31-36:C:4 Compatibility: The proposed use shall be compatible with the residential scale and character of the neighborhood. DECLARATIONS BY AGGRIEVED NEIGHBORS We oppose applicant's request to expand his facility because we live close to applicant's church and experience adverse effects from applicant's enterprise level activities upon the enjoyment, comfort, and convenience of our property, 4-31-36:A: . Enough is enough. The proposed expansion together with applicant's objective to be the regions "equipping" and "sending" organization produce a use incompatible with the residential scale and character of our neighborhood, 4-31-36:C:4. With more space, larger Christian Crusades will most likely result bringing with them a "Kingdome" atmosphere to the neighborhood, 4-31-36:B: . In the obscure use of the added class room capacity, we see a latent threat that a formal Christian School is planned later (the church already has two school busses) . Then, to top it off, we are faced with the already announced plans for a new 1500 seat sanctuary as well as the conversion of the old sanctuary to more class rooms. It is applicant's conjecture that the community benefits from the planned expansion, however, we see the opposite as the case. For with expansion, comes increased noise and dust at all hours as well as overflow street parking and traffic congestion. Inherent conditions that are detrimental to the neighborhood residential quality, 4-31-5:A: . We see very few people in the neighborhood attend the Church, consequently, the expansion doesn't serve the neighborhood at all, 4-31-36:C:2. We conclude that the expanded facility is to be filled through "aggressive outreach" beyond the immediate neighborhood and community at a cost of property rights attrition for Church neighbors, 4-31-36:B. We object. We citizens of the Renton Highlands community point out that within the Highlands area 17 churches offer services for their followers. In the locale of the Highland's Community Church, there are seven churches within walking distance. Any expansion would further inbalance an inured over concentrated condition that already exists, 4-31-36:C:2.a. RELIEF SOUGHT We request that the Hearing Examiner deny the conditional use permit for this expansion. The action would preserve the integrity of our neighborhood so that we adjacent neighbors could coexist with the Church without further attrition of our property rights. PRINTED NAME I SIGNATURE I ADDRESS I ZIP CODE I DATE 1._ f ` _L_.._111U0t ✓D. ._ _ l -._. - ------_._--- '1_�1._-.__.__ W 5�`� 1_�L/ �7��=i , . _7„ 1C_Cf__717_ 01 a 1, / �` .__ �/ 9e { / 4. Lt . % iLikLa ' a121- /,2_ A(fiadat900 9 '21/ pptcc tin v vial)thir- (A-4— g Li 3 ... al4.9 rv,a 6. 7. lit. til1 1136 kva )444 vd/A, (IA to 9 /l .(rl=Tl-�- /� lC�=Ss oti r�i//��- f Q © h y��l ,cam Uv o o I� /� .�" 5-6 �- 0. .� _ ,roc , .14 wv� if-11X lip%_._ ®5: . f; c5 PETITION BY THE NEIGHBORS OPPOSING EXPANSION OF THE HIGHLAND'S COMMUNITY CHURCH To: The Hearing Examiner, City of Renton: We neighbors of the Highland's Community Church oppose granting a conditional use permit for an expanded church. Applicant's Church is located at 3031 N.E.10th Street in a district zoned R-1. As neighbors, we seek relief from the detrimental effects of the proposal to expand by 11900. square feet the predominant structure in the neighborhood. RENTON ZONING CODE SECTIONS/PARAGRAPHS THAT FORM/ THE BASIS FOR RELIEF SOUGHT 4-31-5:A: Purpose: The Residential Zone (R-1) is established for low density single family dwellings. It is further intended to prohibit the development of incompatible uses that are detrimental to the residential environment. 4-31-36:A: Purpose: The purpose of the conditional use permit is to allow certain uses in districts from which they are normally prohibited by this Chapter when the proposed uses are deemed consistent with other existing and potential use within the general area of the proposed use. Except as provided in this Section, a conditional use permit may not reduce the requirements of the zone in which the use is located. 4-31-36:B: Conditional Use Permit: The Hearing Examiner may grant, with or without conditions, or deny the conditional use permit pursuant to Chapter 8, Title IV of the City Code. The Hearing Examiner may limit the term and duration of the conditional use permit. Conditions imposed by the Hearing Examiner shall reasonably assure that nuisance or hazard to life or property will not develop. 4-31-36:C:2 Community Need: There shall be a community need for the proposed use at the proposed location. In determination of community need the Hearing Examiner shall consider the following factors, among other relevant information: a. The proposed location shall not result in either the detrimental over concentration of a particular use within the City or within the immediate area of the proposed use. 4-31-36:C:4 Compatibility: The proposed use shall be compatible with the residential scale and character of the neighborhood. DECLARATIONS BY AGGRIEVED NEIGHBORS We oppose applicant's request to expand his facility because we live close to applicant's church and experience adverse effects from applicant's enterprise level activities upon the enjoyment, comfort, and convenience of our property, 4-31-36:A: . Enough is enough. The proposed expansion together with applicant's objective to be the regions "equipping" and "sending" organization produce a use incompatible with the residential scale and character of our neighborhood, '4-31-36:C:4. With more space, larger Christian Crusades will most likely result bringing with them a "Kingdome" atmosphere to the neighborhood, 4-31-36:B: . In the obscure use of the added class room capacity, we see a latent threat that a formal Christian School is planned later (the church already has two school busses) . Then, to top it off, we are faced with the already announced plans for a new 1500 seat sanctuary as well as the conversion of the old sanctuary to more class rooms. It is applicant's conjecture that the community benefits from the planned expansion, however, we see the opposite as the case. For with expansion, comes increased noise and dust at all hours as well as overflow street parking and traffic congestion. Inherent conditions that are detrimental to the neighborhood residential quality, 4-31-5:A: . We see very few people in the neighborhood attend the Church. consequently, the expansion doesn't serve the neighborhood at all, 4-31-36:C:2. We conclude that the expanded facility is to be filled through "aggressive outreach" beyond the immediate neighborhood and community at a cost of property rights attrition for Church neighbors, 4-31-36:B. We object. We citizens of the Renton Highlands community point out that within the Highlands area 17 churches offer services for their followers. In the locale of the Highland's Community Church, there are seven churches within walking distance. Any expansion would further inbalance an inured over concentrated condition that already exists, 4-31-36:C:2.a. RELIEF SOUGHT We request that the Hearing Examiner deny the conditional use permit for this expansion. The action would preserve the integrity of our neighborhood so that we adjacent neighbors could coexist with the Church without further attrition of our property rights. PRINTED NAME I SIGNATURE I ADDRESS I ZIP CODE I DATE 1-_B eT5-; • q06-- 44,14thffidi Ale./t/Z.. 9g 1,6 gd/ 2.0_0_1_GLeis_2_,. .Zp_i 44-c) (Jo-4- 4,..4"/„.„,00_ed u•e•_./J,C 8-0 6 .,. 1r?lszNf_1Cf1tiZ�� .._��1L'1?tG ?? d • _ La' _ _a_10,11_0.11.1,C0Cd4W - 1U-) -/X00 ) 7-eh - - _,c,e_..(-40 /67.6 -1A° ulAtt-0-0.e-d - Ze70.5%, 7( (cry_y (e)6-s-- aitL-- r j'es. le (.4.,t-c "7 (.)s 4;4 8--._.__ �1: . __.._ 1, �CS - - ' ._.. ..__ �-k.i �_�J/ .L u3 00r12 e- # ' / (` e/ - 9. - _- =!n d _ ' � '''�� >r- __:.__.._._.._....-_ /Oze _. ..e..L -._._. FU . . yak J 6-,A c ._ .. ........_.� :P..dc_.. ..._..-fit ... 5......_. .`I�. PETITION BY THE NEIGHBORS OPPOSING EXPANSION OF THE HIGHLAND'S COMMUNITY CHURCH To: The Hearing Examiner, City of Renton: We neighbors of the Highland's Community Church oppose granting a conditional use permit for an expanded church. Applicant's Church is located at 3031 N.E.10th Street in a district zoned R-1. As neighbors, we seek relief from the detrimental effects of the proposal to expand by 11900 square feet the predominant structure in the neighborhood. RENTON ZONING CODE SECTIONS/PARAGRAPHS THAT FORM THE BASIS FOR RELIEF SOUGHT 4-31-5:A: Purpose: The Residential Zone (R-1) is established for low density single family dwellings. It is further intended to prohibit the development of incompatible uses that are detrimental to the residential environment. 4-31-36:A: Purpose: The purpose of the conditional use permit is to allow certain uses in districts from which they are normally prohibited by this Chapter when the proposed uses are deemed consistent with other existing and potential use within the general area of the proposed use. Except as provided in this Section, a conditional use permit may not reduce the requirements of the zone in which the use is located. 4-31-36:B: Conditional Use Permit: The Hearing Examiner may grant, with or without conditions, or deny the conditional use permit pursuant to Chapter 8, Title IV of the City Code. The Hearing Examiner may limit the term and duration of the conditional use permit. Conditions imposed by the Hearing Examiner shall reasonably assure that nuisance or hazard to life or property will not develop. 4-31-36:C:2 Community Need: There shall be a community need for the proposed use at the proposed location. In determination of community need the Hearing Examiner shall consider the following factors, among other relevant information: a. The proposed location shall not result in either the detrimental over concentration of a particular use within tie City or withinthe immediate area of the proposed use. 4-31-36:C:4 Compatibility: The proposed use shall be compatible with the residential scale and character of the neighborhood. DECLARATIONS BY AGGRIEVED NEIGHBORS We oppose applicant's request to expand his facility because we live close to applicant's church and experience adverse effects from applicant's enterprise level activities upon the enjoyment, comfort, and convenience of our property, 4-31-36:A: . Enough is enough. The proposed expansion together with applicant's objective to be the regions "equipping" and "sending" organization produce a use incompatible with the residential scale and character of our neighborhood, 4-31-36:C:4. With more space, larger Christian Crusades will most likely result bringing with them a "Kingdome" atmosphere to the neighborhood, 4-31-36:B: . In the obscure use of the added class room capacity, we see a latent threat that a formal Christian School is planned later (the church already has two school busses) . Then, to top it off, we are faced with the already announced plans for a new 1500 seat sanctuary as well as the conversion of the old sanctuary to more class rooms. It is applicant's conjecture that the community benefits from the planned expansion, however, we see the opposite as the case. For with expansion. comes increased noise and dust at all hours as well as overflow street parking and traffic congestion. Inherent conditions that are detrimental to the neighborhood residential quality, 4-31-5:A: . We see very few people in the neighborhood attend the Church, consequently, the expansion doesn't serve the neighborhood at all, 4-31-36:C:2. We conclude that the expanded facility is to be filled through "aggressive outreach" beyond the immediate neighborhood and community at a cost of property rights attrition for Church neighbors, 4-31-36:B. We object. We citizens of the Renton Highlands community point out that within the Highlands area 17 churches offer services for their followers. In the locale of the Highland's Community Church, there are seven churches within walking distance. Any expansion would further inbalance an inured over concentrated condition that already exists, 4-31-36:C:2.a. RELIEF SOUGHT We request that the Hearing Examiner deny the conditional use permit for this expansion. The action would preserve the integrity of our neighborhood so that we adjacent neighbors could coexist with the Church without further attrition of our property rights. PRINTED NAME I SIGNATURE I ADDRESS I ZIP CODE I DATE 1. _ ..._ea r _.lC4I-.t 111314,c)(24-14,E-J4'6 _ rig./i/_ 7 • r 5. 6. 7. B. i.B. • C-7 PETITION BY THE NEIGHBORS OPPOSING EXPANSION OF THE HIGHLAND'S COMMUNITY CHURCH To: The Hearing Examiner, City of Renton: We neighbors of the Highland's Community Church oppose granting a conditional use permit for an expanded church. Applicant's Church is located at 3031 N.E.10th Street in a district zoned R-1. As neighbors, we seek relief from the detrimental effects of the proposal to expand by 11900 square feet the predominant structure in the neighborhood. RENTON ZONING CODE SECTIONS/PARAGRAPHS THAT FORM THE BASIS FOR RELIEF SOUGHT 4-31-5:A: Purpose: The Residential Zone (R-1) is established for low density single family dwellings. It is further intended to prohibit the development of incompatible uses that are detrimental to the residential environment. 4-31-36:A: Purpose: The purpose of the conditional use permit is to allow certain uses in districts from which they are normally prohibited by this Chapter when the proposed uses are deemed consistent with other existing and potential use within the general area of the proposed use. Except as provided in this Section, a conditional use permit may not reduce the requirements of the zone in which the use is located. 4-31-36:B: Conditional Use Permit: The Hearing Examiner may grant, with or without conditions, or deny the conditional use permit pursuant to Chapter 8, Title IV of the City Code. The Hearing Examiner may limit the term and duration of the conditional use permit. Conditions imposed by the Hearing Examiner shall reasonably assure that nuisance or hazard to life or property will not develop. 4-31-36:C:2 Community Need: There shall be a community need for the proposed use at the proposed location.. In determination of community need the Hearing Examiner shall consider the following factors, among other relevant information: a. The proposed location shall not result in either the detrimental over concentration of a particular use within the City or within the immediatearea of the proposed use. 4-31-36:C:4 Compatibility: The proposed use shall be compatible with the residential scale and character of the neighborhood. DECLARATIONS BY AGGRIEVED NEIGHBORS We oppose applicant's request to expand his facility because we live close to applicant's church and experience adverse effects from applicant's enterprise level activities upon the enjoyment, comfort, and convenience of our property. 4-31-36:A: . Enough is enough. The proposed expansion together with applicant's objective to be the regions "equipping" and "sending" organization produce a use incompatible with the residential scale and character of our neighborhood, 4-31-36:C:4. With more space, larger Christian Crusades will most likely result bringing with them a "Kingdome" atmosphere to the neighborhood, 4-31-36:B: . In the obscure use of the added class room capacity, we see a latent threat that a formal Christian School is planned later (the church already has two school busses) . Then, to top it off, we are faced with the already announced plans for a new 1500 seat sanctuary as well as the conversion of the old sanctuary to more class rooms. It is applicant's conjecture that the community benefits from the planned expansion, however, we see the opposite as the case. For with expansion, comes increased noise and dust at all hours as well as overflow street parking and traffic congestion. Inherent conditions that are detrimental to the neighborhood residential quality, 4-31-5:A: . We see very few people in the neighborhood attend the Church, consequently, the expansion doesn't serve the neighborhood at all, 4-31-36:C:2. We conclude that the expanded facility is to be filled through "aggressive outreach" beyond the immediate neighborhood and community at a cost of property rights attrition for Church neighbors, 4-31-36:B. We object. We citizens of the Renton Highlands community point out that within the Highlands area 17 churches offer services for their followers. In the locale of the Highland's Community Church, there are seven churches within walking distance. Any expansion would further inbalance an inured over concentrated condition that already exists, 4-31-36:C:2.a. RELIEF SOUGHT • We request that the Hearing Examiner deny the conditional use permit for this expansion. The action would preserve the integrity of our neighborhood so that we adjacent neighbors could coexist with the Church without further attrition of our property rights. PRINTED NAME I SIGNATURE I ADDRESS I ZIP CODE I DATE 1. L o 5'D /-49S - - ----- 44:e-et-i �'.�3 jejleGacr 9�4,.5-i `5� 1 / A F., %/E Sort/ y/ Ritz_ �D f���/� 9�os� s-7 9/ • k7Che.-y.__ ..__5- fiver` _ _ � .._..44E ._. '—�' --..5._7 ..._ V o5-6 �=8=�// l Q 0 y riric 7- c 4 ^ _.__. -. l C(41/- L 8. /C(iV()/ 4 SiV /0Z-Ec A.A.1..-A,4_/_1 Ca-OS-6 LA lad6 16-kkaldCAC /2 eos-4.. s)26/7/ _..._ __.. PGY _.... 0. �� ( _.___. .._._._._._._. . aaNE VA 61 cis- 7 5 c -g . PETITION BY THE NEIGHBORS OPPOSING EXPANSION OF THE HIGHLAND'S COMMUNITY CHURCH To: The Hearing Examiner, City of Renton: We neighbors of the Highland's Community Church oppose granting a conditional use permit for an expanded church. Applicant's Church is located at 3031 N.E.10th Street in a district zoned R-1. As neighbors, we seek relief from the detrimental effects of the proposal to expand by 11900 square feet the predominant structure in the neighborhood. RENTON ZONING CODE SECTIONS/PARAGRAPHS THAT FORM THE BASIS FOR RELIEF SOUGHT 4-31-5:A: Purpose: The Residential Zone (R-1) is established for low density single family dwellings. It is further intended to prohibit the development of incompatible uses that are detrimental to the residential environment. 4-31-36:A: Purpose: The purpose of the conditional use permit is to allow certain uses in districts from which they are normally prohibited by this Chapter when the proposed uses are deemed consistent with other existing and potential use within the general area of the proposed use. Except as provided in this. Section, a conditional use permit may not reduce the requirements of the zone in which the use is located. 4-31-36:B: Conditional Use Permit: The Hearing Examiner may grant, with or without conditions, or deny the conditional use permit pursuant to Chapter 8, Title IV of the City Code. The Hearing Examiner may limit the term and duration of the conditional use permit. Conditions imposed by the Hearing Examiner shall reasonably assure that nuisance or hazard to life or property will not develop. 4-31-36:C:2 Community Need: There shall be a community need for the proposed use at the proposed location. In determination of community need the Hearing Examiner shall consider the following factors, among other relevant information: a. The proposed location shall not result in either the detrimental over concentration of a particular use within the City or within the immediate area of the proposed use. 4-31-36:C:4 Compatibility: The proposed use shall be compatible with the residential scale and character of the neighborhood. DECLARATIONS BY AGGRIEVED NEIGHBORS We oppose applicant's request to expand his facility because we live close to applicant's church and experience adverse effects from applicant's enterprise level activities upon the enjoyment, comfort, and convenience of our property, 4-31-36:A: . Enough is enough. The proposed expansion together with applicant's objective to be the regions "equipping" and "sending" organization produce a use incompatible with the residential scale and character of our neighborhood, 4-31-36:C:4. With more space, larger Christian Crusades will most likely result bringing with them a "Kingdome" atmosphere to the neighborhood, 4-31-36:B: . In the obscure use of the added class .room capacity, we see a latent threat that a formal Christian School is planned later (the church already has two school busses) . Then, to top it off, we are faced with the already announced plans for a new 1500 seat sanctuary as well as the conversion of the old sanctuary to more class rooms. It is applicant's conjecture that the community benefits from the planned expansion, however, we see the opposite as the case. For with expansion, comes increased noise and dust at all hours as well as overflow street parking and traffic congestion. Inherent conditions that are detrimental to the neighborhood residential quality, 4-31-5:A: . We see very few people in the neighborhood attend the Church, consequently, the expansion doesn't serve the neighborhood at all, 4-31-36:C:2. We conclude that the expanded facility is to be filled through "aggressive outreach" beyond the immediate neighborhood and community at a cost of property rights attrition for Church neighbors, 4-31-36:B. We object. We citizens of the Renton Highlands community point out that within the Highlands area 17 churches offer services for their followers. In the locale of the Highland's Community Church, there are seven churches within walking distance. Any expansion would further imbalance an inured over concentrated condition that already exists, 4-31-36:C:2.a. RELIEF SOUGHT We request that the Hearing Examiner deny the conditional use permit for this expansion. The action would preserve the integrity of our neighborhood so that we adjacent neighbors could coexist with the Church without further attrition of our property rights. PRINTED NAME I SIGNATURE I ADDRESS I ZIP CODE I DATE l•_leLeArd_ICs___61PEP iee,24:44_,g A.4,10A), _ `rz,civtiow 2.__ .0_wi e.✓ fc, a lS oQe�i' � 1.51_.!�!�,Lam'c�r� �c�c�lvc /7-0.1 6 ,1�/4/�f / i�•-►y4.11,A_1.11,L dit__---Sr- e.G..rs__. .._ 7. �1�- �v_ _ .. . _____----- . l3a_. �ftfaA ti,_c __►�7 _ _2 2�i__ .-7Z6/`l �j4. /06fa/0 67 ZA/iveTr _------.-.------,-.- - - _ i,'�-- 7 . eo Z /1), . 9d' 9/ 5./1/7/7-7 uo,ta 11, we U jc/_La-lake i_.,,,,„,,e—, FO /tiC�o a___i_ i --c/k/� 7 i"-'0 6--C /2/ 6. _ eh-L/14 4.1)1t._1—Z— g Vicim/w.(A4,114e.p .- %5----6 /6hi ..t. w t....—, 7.._.;'..../1\1±( 4_k7....c.d.-.te-0 PctildeieMoD Ate- Alb— --o,)Z, --; re---1( 8. _( V.�V , `___V�cs Cv_ _._".. ..._.__ -.__..____� ��. �9........_...._. %_r��(. .... a63\ :wJ..C _k _ITa G 6 .._. s :46 -61 9. - C-7 PETITION BY THE NEIGHBORS OPPOSING EXPANSION OF THE HIGHLAND'S COMMUNITY CHURCH To: The Hearing Examiner, City of Renton: We neighbors of the Highland's Community Church oppose granting a conditional use permit for an expanded church. Applicant's Church is located at 3031 N.E.10th Street in a district zoned R-1.. As neighbors, we seek relief from the detrimental effects of the proposal to expand by 11900 square feet the predominant structure in the neighborhood. RENTON ZONING CODE SECTIONS/PARAGRAPHS THAT FORM THE BASIS FOR RELIEF SOUGHT 4-31-5:A: Purpose: The Residential Zone (R-1) is established for low density single family dwellings. It is further intended to prohibit the development of incompatible uses that are detrimental to the residential environment. 4-31-36:A: Purpose: The purpose of the conditional use permit is to 'allow certain uses in districts from which they are normally prohibited by this Chapter when the proposed uses 'are deemed consistent with other existing and potential use within the general area of the proposed use. Except as provided in this Section, a conditional use permit may not reduce the requirements of the zone in which the use is located. 4-31-36:B: Conditional Use Permit: The Hearing Examiner may grant, with or without conditions, or deny •the conditional use permit pursuant to Chapter 8, Title IV of the City Code. The Hearing Examiner may limit the term and duration of the conditional use permit. Conditions imposed by the Hearing Examiner shall reasonably assure that nuisance or hazard to life or property will not develop. 4-31-36:C:2 Community Need: There shall be a community need for the proposed use at the proposed location. In determination of community need the Hearing Examiner shall consider the following factors, among other relevant information: a. The proposed location shall not result in either the detrimental over concentration of a particular use within the City or within the immediate area of the proposed use. 4-31-36:C:4 Compatibility: The proposed use shall be compatible with the residential scale and character of the neighborhood. DECLARATIONS BY AGGRIEVED NEIGHBORS We oppose applicant's request to expand his facility because we live close to applicant's church and experience adverse effects from applicant's enterprise level activities upon the enjoyment, comfort, and convenience of our property, 4-31-36:A: . Enough is enough. The proposed expansion together with applicant's objective to be the regions "equipping" and "sending" organization produce a use incompatible with the residential scale and character of our neighborhood, 4-31-36:C:4. With more space, larger Christian Crusades will most likely result bringing with them a "Kingdome" atmosphere to the neighborhood, 4-31-36:B: . In the obscure use of the added class room capacity, we see a latent threat that a formal Christian School is planned later (the church already has two school busses) . Then, to top it off, we are faced with the already announced plans for a new 1500 seat sanctuary as well as the conversion of the old sanctuary to more class rooms. It is applicant's conjecture that the community benefits from the planned expansion, however, we see the opposite as the case. For with expansion, comes increased noise and dust at all hours as well as overflow street parking and traffic congestion. Inherent conditions that are detrimental to the neighborhood residential quality, 4-31-5:A: . We see very few people in the neighborhood attend the Church, consequently, the expansion doesn't serve the neighborhood at all, 4-31-36:C:2. We conclude that the expanded facility is to be filled through "aggressive outreach" beyond the immediate neighborhood and community at a cost of property rights attrition for Church neighbors, 4-31-36:B. We object. We citizens of the Renton Highlands community point out that within the Highlands area 17 churches offer services for their followers. In the locale of the Highland's Community Church, there are seven churches within walking distance. Any expansion would further inbalance an inured over concentrated condition that already exists, 4-31-36:C:2.a. RELIEF SOUGHT We request that the Hearing Examiner deny the conditional use permit for this expansion. The action would preserve the integrity of our neighborhood so that we adjacent neighbors could coexist with the Church without further attrition of our property rights. PRINTED NAME I SIGNAT E I ADDRESS I ZIP CODE I DATE /1041Li e,.7."6-g,41€1.0„ 44= 7f-cyu 1. 44 - - t j14/=�•_Ji_e_C ''l// :._.Ctn� - - — ,:Y/ ._ SJ° .4 J-t-=•�j_.__ _ �D�ji-- (��•F—J/ • , �z _.. __.S�r=.; :,y "__...____. _.__ __._------.--_-----_----- 03 ... �` _. _.AX.V • fresh._.__ r9/ 4. . _ - _-__ --- --- -- d'26461 /I, _ `f Sir .._. -- -- YOrg------ -/ c•._./ � ^ _/_� ___ = ... � Sv1� ...-._._.__._= 1 E 7 44 7. Je.fi J-7e/VE-erlAre-- 1)14//04P-e eosi 8. •L7ARL W r .--€RNt2 pl l /G_ - LG /� 9. V�./,/l �;77_/'/' ✓�- tti !s_. �C%� �'�h^ 77 �itti! °v_._..__..._..._ ��d j-Q! / .,-5. ! A vL.. .l— q"cf.0 S G �- a — 9/ 10. ©._s_. _. �� l / S ___ ... ' sue--% � � .._ _... % 4 � - -/o PETITION BY THE NEIGHBORS OPPOSING EXPANSION OF THE HIGHLAND'S COMMUNITY CHURCH - To: The Hearing Examiner, City of Renton: We neighbors of the Highland's Community Church oppose granting a conditional use permit for an expanded church. Applicant's Church is located at 3031 N.E.10th Street in a district zoned R-1. As neighbors, we seek relief from the detrimental effects of the proposal to expand by 11900 square feet the predominant structure in the neighborhood. RENTON ZONING CODE SECTIONS/PARAGRAPHS THAT FORM THE BASIS FOR RELIEF SOUGHT 4-31-5:A: Purpose: The Residential Zone (R-1) is established for low density single family dwellings. It is further intended to prohibit the development of incompatible uses that are detrimental to the residential environment. 4-31-36:A: Purpose: The purpose of the conditional use permit is to allow certain uses in districts from which they are normally prohibited by this Chapter when the proposed uses are deemed consistent with other existing and potential use within the general area of the proposed use. Except as provided in this Section, a conditional use permit may not reduce the requirements of the zone in which the use is located. 4-31-36:B: Conditional Use Permit: The Hearing Examiner may grant, with or without conditions, or deny the conditional use permit pursuant to Chapter 8, Title IV of the City Code. The Hearing Examiner may limit the term and diIration of the conditional use permit. Conditions imposed by the Hearing Examiner shall reasonably assure that nuisance or hazard to life or property will not develop. 4-31-36:C:2 Community Need: There shall be a community need for the proposed use at the proposed location. In determination of community need the Hearing Examiner shall consider the following factors, among other relevant information: a. The proposed location shall not result in either the detrimental over concentration of a particular use within the City or within the immediate area of the proposed use. 4-31-36:C:4 Compatibility: The proposed use shall be compatible with the residential scale and character of the neighborhood. DECLARATIONS BY AGGRIEVED NEIGHBORS We oppose applicant's request to expand his facility because we live close to applicant's church and experience adverse effects from applicant's enterprise level activities upon the enjoyment, comfort, and convenience of our property, 4-31-36:A: . Enough is enough. The proposed expansion together with applicant's objective to be the regions "equipping" and "sending" organization produce a use incompatible.with the residential scale and character of our neighborhood, 4-31-36:C:4. With more space, larger Christian Crusades will most likely result .bringing with them a "Kingdome" atmosphere to the neighborhood, 4-31-36:B: . In the obscure use of the added class room capacity, we see a latent threat that a formal Christian School is planned later (the church already has two school busses) . Then, to top it off, we are faced with the already announced plans for a new 1500 seat sanctuary as well as the conversion of the old sanctuary to more class rooms. It is applicant's conjecture that the community benefits from the planned expansion, however, we see the opposite as the case. For with expansion, comes increased noise and dust at all hours as well as overflow street parking and traffic congestion. Inherent conditions that are detrimental to the neighborhood residential quality, 4-31-5:A: . We see very few people in the neighborhood attend the Church, consequently, the expansion doesn't serve the neighborhood at all, 4-31-36:C:2. We conclude that the expanded facility is to be filled through "aggressive outreach" beyond the immediate neighborhood and community at a cost of property rights attrition for Church neighbors, 4-31-36:B. We object. We citizens of the Renton Highlands community point out that within the Highlands area 17 churches offer services for their followers. In the locale of the Highland's Community Church, there are seven churches within walking distance. Any expansion would further inbalance an inured over concentrated condition that already exists, 4-31-36:C:2.a. RELIEF SOUGHT • We request that the Hearing Examiner deny the conditional use permit for this expansion. The action would preserve the integrity of our neighborhood so that we adjacent neighbors could coexist with the Church without further attrition of our property rights. PRINTED NAME I SIGNATURE I ADDRESS I ZIP CODE I DATE 1• Z , z__ q 3,ti r,4/ate -dP4e 477L'a. 1� MA& /' a� 0,2 "` "- - --- 9 t-41Z:5 4va__ ' f8mMa7 -0 02 rkt. Qq05CD 19-ci� ti.. RAWk 0_ PRAM S . , ° --- 9 S K�kkC /��E �C W050 5- / • 5.....5)0611 _ se,1 _._. _Sk __. ._.._._�ct}D_._ gag Li-de la/Id Ave AZ 3Ed 5=19.9 6. _-----.. -......_ ._.._ -------•-------.---._ _.--- ._..._----------------•--. --.--- ----•-----6 _8_._ K2,..0.2.44deAr ,3 ?/ . � . C �e cz ..�j /4_ -- 300 9 `) C 9 US_6.. __-2/-9d c-ri PETITION BY THE NEIGHBORS OPPOSING EXPANSION OF THE HIGHLAND'S COMMUNITY CHURCH To: The Hearing Examiner, City of Renton: We neighbors of the Highland's Community Church oppose granting a conditional use permit for an expanded church. Applicant's Church is located at 3031 N.E.10th Street in a district zoned R-1. As neighbors, we seek relief from the detrimental effects of the proposal to expand by 11900 square feet the predominant structure in the neighborhood. RENTON ZONING CODE SECTIONS/PARAGRAPHS THAT FORM THE BASIS FOR RELIEF SOUGHT 4-31-5:A: Purpose: The Residential Zone (R-1) is established for low density single family dwellings. It is further intended to prohibit the development of incompatible uses that are detrimental to the residential environment. 4-31-36:A: Purpose: The purpose of the conditional use permit is to allow certain uses in districts from which they are normally prohibited by this Chapter when the proposed uses are deemed consistent with other existing and potential use within the general area of the proposed use. Except as provided in this Section, a conditional use permit may not reduce the requirements of the zone in which the use is located. 4-31-36:B: Conditional Use Permit: The Hearing Examiner may grant, with or without conditions, or deny the conditional use permit pursuant to Chapter 8, Title IV of the City Code. The Hearing Examiner may limit the term and duration of the conditional use permit. Conditions imposed by the Hearing Examiner shall reasonably assure that nuisance or hazard to life or property will not develop. 4-31-36:C:2 Community Need:, There shall be a community need for the proposed use at the proposed location. In determination of community need the Hearing Examiner shall consider the following factors, among other relevant information: a. The proposed location shall not result in either the detrimental over concentration of a particular use within the City or within the immediate area of the proposed use. . 4-31-36:C:4 Compatibility: The proposed use shall be compatible with the residential scale and character of the neighborhood. DECLARATIONS BY AGGRIEVED NEIGHBORS We oppose applicant's request to expand his facility because we live close to applicant's church and experience adverse effects from applicant's enterprise level activities upon the enjoyment, comfort, and convenience of our property, 4-31-36:A: . Enough is enough. The proposed expansion together with applicant's objective to be the regions "equipping" and "sending" organization produce a use incompatible with the residential scale and character of our • neighborhood, 4-31-36:C:4. With more space, larger Christian Crusades will most likely result bringing with them a "Kingdome" atmosphere to the neighborhood, 4-31-36:B: . In the obscure use of the added class room capacity, we see a latent threat that a formal Christian School is planned later (the church already has two school busses) . Then, to top it off, we are faced with the already announced plans for a new 1500 seat sanctuary as well as the conversion of the old sanctuary to more class rooms. It is applicant's conjecture that the community benefits from the planned expansion, however, we see the opposite as the case. For with expansion, comes increased noise and dust at all hours as well as overflow street parking and traffic congestion. Inherent conditions that are detrimental to the neighborhood residential quality, 4-31-5:A: . We see very few people in the neighborhood attend the Church, consequently, the expansion doesn't serve the neighborhood at all, 4-31-36:C:2. We conclude that the expanded facility is to be filled through "aggressive outreach" beyond the immediate neighborhood and community at a cost of property rights attrition for Church neighbors, 4-31-36:B. We object. We citizens of the Renton Highlands community point out that within the Highlands area 17 churches offer services for their followers. In the locale of the Highland's Community Church, there are seven churches within walking distance. Any expansion would further inbalance an inured over concentrated condition that already exists, 4-31-36:C:2.a. RELIEF SOUGHT We request that the Hearing Examiner deny the conditional use permit for this expansion. The action would preserve the integrity of our neighborhood so that we adjacent neighbors could coexist with the Church without further attrition of our property rights. PRINTED NAME I SIGNATURE I ADDRESS I ZIP CODE I DATE 1- ZIRZAA g - A2 , r !c=e 5,5- lT i v JV' . -SS 6 / 2. i.p Ft y N Iv 1,4 564- Ki p Kum A 0 N '005s 5=z thy l , 4. 24611-1f.4-itlaiVk___ _____I ....20:..... X7 434 _Rd//A-1(h.,(3//7/7-vilf.--.2 -7 g17,5-'6. ii-Z2M. 5 _..Z A-1- 1` /`dr Ile)/ /066F geklAiud Atof, au c 9?0,56 `5` 5/ / 6.C-16J(et_i_e_g_-____eAki-__c:_t2,--__ e_,LeA-e. c-e.e.k.,ce. -i/6 • 3rao 00,E, /07 ic6 ,.n;, ,?;,&-...fr fy . -- ___a../4.4,:a.._,/_ _4( 2_1._ __ . .1.)._ ,w ,..u., _ ,,,w, ,,a4,7,a2A.e.„/";6- ',Da- rAz.4/ • , ?(F. ,q1,-a.,,g_) 0:67 4 )e. ,c_6-',c _c_s.Y-ssg5.p. c) „.., „,----. i 06-- k._) ( 6g6--, or6oz- 6- ? 1 0. _ w .--.1..- 1�0. �..� -._. ._ . __...` .._ .a .._._.. 1?,-),. Y-c'w.r 1o0/al.....1 ...1 .9. ® ..h.__ .a `(/ C-/z . PETITION BY THE NEIGHBORS OPPOSING EXPANSION OF THE HIGHLAND'S COMIMUNITY CHURCH To: The Hearing Examiner, City of Renton: We neighbors of the Highland's Community Church oppose granting a conditional use permit for an expanded church. Applicant's Church is located at 3031 N.E.10th Street in a district zoned R-1. As neighbors, we seek relief from the detrimental effects of the proposal to expand by 11900 square feet the predominant structure in the neighborhood. • RENTON ZONING CODE SECTIONS/PARAGRAPHS THAT FORM THE BASIS FOR RELIEF SOUGHT 4-31-5:A: Purpose: The Residential Zone (R-1) is established for low density single family dwellings. It is further intended to prohibit the development of incompatible uses that are detrimental to the residential environment. 4-31-36:A: Purpose: The purpose of the conditional use permit is to allow certain uses in districts from which they are normally prohibited by this Chapter when the proposed uses are deemed consistent with other existing and potential use within the general area of the proposed use. Except as provided in this Section, a conditional use permit may not reduce the requirements of the zone in which the use is located. 4-31-36:B: Conditional Use Permit: The Hearing Examiner may grant, with or without conditions, or deny the conditional use permit pursuant to Chapter 8, Title IV of the City Code. The Hearing Examiner may limit the term and duration of the conditional use permit. Conditions imposed by the Hearing Examiner shall reasonably assure that nuisance or hazard to life or property will not develop. 4-31-36:C:2 Community Need: There shall be a community need for the proposed use at the proposed location. In determination of community need the Hearing Examiner shall consider the following factors, among other relevant information: a. The proposed location shall not result in either the detrimental over concentration of a particular use within the City or within the immediate area of the proposed use. 4-31-36:C:4 Compatibility: The proposed use shall be compatible with the residential scale and character of the neighborhood. DECLARATIONS BY AGGRIEVED NEIGHBORS We oppose applicant's request to expand his facility because we live close to applicant's church and experience adverse effects from applicant's enterprise level activities upon the enjoyment, comfort, and convenience of our property, 4-31-36:A:. Enough is enough. The proposed expansion together with applicant's objective to be the regions "equipping" and "sending" organization produce a use incompatible with the residential scale and character of our neighborhood, 4-31-36:C:4. With more space, larger Christian Crusades will most likely result bringing with them a "Kingdome" atmosphere to the neighborhood, 4-31-36:B: . In the obscure use of the added class room capacity, we see a. , latent threat that a formal Christian School is planned later (the church already has two school busses) . Then, to top it off, we are faced with the already announced plans for a new 1500 seat sanctuary as well as the conversion of the old sanctuary to more class rooms. It is applicant's conjecture that the community benefits from the planned expansion, however, we see the opposite as the case. For with expansion, comes increased noise and dust at all hours as well as overflow street parking and traffic congestion. Inherent conditions that are detrimental to the neighborhood residential quality, 4-31-5:A: . We see very few people in the neighborhood attend the Church, consequently, the expansion doesn't serve the neighborhood at all, 4-31-36:C:2. We conclude that the expanded facility is to be filled through "aggressive outreach" beyond the immediate neighborhood and community at a cost of property rights attrition for Church neighbors, 4-31-36:B. We object. We citizens of the Renton Highlands community point out that within the Highlands area 17 churches offer services for their followers. In the locale of the Highland's Community Church, there are seven churches within walking distance. Any expansion would further inbalance an inured over concentrated condition that already exists, 4-31-36:C:2.a. RELIEF SOUGHT We request that the Hearing Examiner deny the conditional use permit for this expansion. The action would preserve the integrity of our neighborhood so that we adjacent neighbors could coexist with the Church without further attrition of our property rights. PRINTED NAME I SIGNATURE I ADDRESS I ZIP CODE I DATE y/ 1, ci„di gel,v/IA, _------ ------ q 5-Len.u2o_,_.A__ ye_!v± .-°1_glo .5j2/9/ 2, f_) .k../o.if L,_5-,SY-":47,60 odcla,wd__,J / g.'r-z:./ cil..462.0te.)e . gro,c‘ 5-17-F1 • ALQ___ __ N_Q_dsaAL 4Qiqn ----- - s5. - . 7. �_ Ø,4// :. _ -- _ ' ' _..._._._.. -- - -- h' = _ / Ad vim �c 7 ...._.' W.>, s/` 014-.1a_c_425.14-7/1914.- M) git.'i •X _ik/k/Z44/49/L/ iric2, iliV1660/0 d/V b -: 7 r0S-6 S://I/p --JOintiit7 jklossiu fit, 1� g A lJ c L 5 i . l-'0�� 4timul7 , _ee 6 •o )- ./V 6`'�jt,---, ? r l Xc 1 / i sPETITION BY THE NEIGHBORS OPPOSING EXPANSION OF THE HIGHLAND'S COMMUNITY CHURCH �To: The Hearing_ Examiner, City of Renton: f We neighbors of the Highland's Community Church oppose granting a conditional use permit for an expanded church. Applicant's Church is located at 3031 N.E.10th Street in a district zoned R-1. As neighbors. we seek relief from the detrimental effects of the proposal to expand by 11900 square feet the predominant structure in the neighborhood. RENTON ZONING CODE SECTIONS/PARAGRAPHS THAT FORM THE BASIS FOR RELIEF SOUGHT 4-31-5:A: Purpose: The Residential Zone (R-1) is established for low density single family dwellings. It is further intended to prohibit the development of incompatible uses that are detrimental to the residential environment. 4-31-36:A: Purpose: The purpose of the conditional use permit is to allow certain uses in districts from which they are normally prohibited by this Chapter when the proposed uses are deemed consistent with other existing and potential use within the general area of the proposed use. Except as provided in this Section, a conditional use permit may not reduce the requirements of the zone in which the use is located. 4-31-36:B: Conditional Use Permit: The Hearing Examiner may grant, with or without conditions, or deny the conditional use permit pursuant to Chapter 8, Title IV of the City Code. The Hearing Examiner may limit the term and duration of the conditional use permit. Conditions imposed by the Hearing Examiner shall reasonably assure that nuisance or hazard to life or property will not develop. 4-31-36:C:2 Community Need: There shall be a community need for the proposed use at the proposed location. In determination of community need the Hearing Examiner shall consider the following factors, among other relevant information: a. The proposed location shall not result in either the detrimental over concentration of a particular use within the City or within the immediate area of the proposed use. 4-31-36:C:4 Compatibility: The proposed use shall be compatible with the residential scale and character of the neighborhood. • DECLARATIONS BY AGGRIEVED NEIGHBORS 1 We oppose applicant's request to expand his facility because we live close to applicant's church and experience adverse effects from applicant's enterprise level activities upon the enjoyment, comfort, and convenience of our property, 4-31-36:A:. Enough is enough. The proposed expansion together with applicant's objective to be the regions "equipping" and "sending" organization produce a use incompatible with the residential scale and character of our neighborhood, 4-31-36:C:4. With more space, larger Christian Crusades will most likely result bringing with them a "Kingdome" atmosphere to the neighborhood, 4-31-36:B: . In the obscure use of the added class room capacity, we see a latent threat that a formal Christian School is planned later (the church already has two school busses) . Then, to top it off, we are faced with the already announced plans for a new 1500 seat sanctuary as well as the conversion of the old sanctuary to more class rooms. It is applicant's conjecture that the community benefits from the planned expansion, however, we see the opposite as the case. For with expansion, comes increased noise and dust at all hours as well as overflow street parking and traffic congestion. Inherent conditions that are detrimental to the neighborhood residential quality, 4-31-5:A: . We see very few people in the neighborhood attend the Church, consequently, the expansion doesn't serve the neighborhood at all, 4-31-36:C:2. We conclude that the expanded facility is to be filled through "aggressive outreach" beyond the immediate neighborhood and community at a cost of property rights attrition for Church neighbors, 4-31-36:B. We object. We citizens of the Renton Highlands community point out that within the Highlands area 17 churches offer services for their followers. In the locale of the Highland's Community Church, there are seven churches within walking distance. Any expansion would further inbalance an inured over concentrated condition that already exists, 4-31-36:C:2.a. 1 RELIEF SOUGHT We request that the Hearing Examiner deny the conditional use permit for this expansion. The action would preserve the integrity of our neighborhood so that we adjacent neighbors could coexist with the Church without further attrition of our property rights. PRINTED NAME I SIGNATURE I ADDRESS I ZIP CODE I DATE (,/ (... 'P ' L , .. .- f ,..._ ,..._ '7:3(17 11)g ./04 - 51- 2.60__)I__ .6:710/ • )A u L A C K I� -_�'��. - _---- --- -- -c �;� T'� r- 5 174 J f.?C - -1-/ ' 5! a--4='-01-2&--4-4 Li.• _45., 4 t C-, -71:::-, (f 11- ---Z- g_k0.02 4_E._! /O.rit. 41.4_0..Z.7.i 2C-A.) 1P0 7Fkre 5: /I —7( 5. a K iC _ .L._ e ,. 1 `Li _•_ a3 /�-.�-//1I.�2/ .,c R,.., ,, / l J v .-7� v e T" ,1 / ,,LL N sr. ..-e,,,, gizo6 cY- 7^ _61.2)11. A.-ST .E.4. AkQ_Th . <-04.06 El (-1024' 3,64 -716, ild ,1t i' -.P4A-7(0. (0 cigi e,1 s /) ) AA,rl 4_, 1`7 ? . y)_. / :._..._.__ J y 0 y/ /d -7_ -_ './� l,.fdsz. s' ,3/-7/ .4...� ..„..4.5.4_..),.4-_._... _ .`�!.C?. /.VL ... C�-- S.T.._._.L C� Imo i.) 7e0S6 31`V XCZ PETITION BY THE NEIGHBORS OPPOSING EXPANSION OF THE HIGHLAND'S COMMUNITY CHURCH To: The Hearing Examiner, City of Renton: We neighbors of the Highland's Community Church oppose granting a conditional use permit for an expanded church. Applicant's Church is located at 3031 N.E.10th Street in a district zoned R-1. As neighbors, we seek relief from the detrimental effects of the proposal to expand by 11900 square feet the predominant structure in the neighborhood. RENTON ZONING CODE SECTIONS/PARAGRAPHS THAT FORM THE BASIS FOR RELIEF SOUGHT 4-31-5:A: Purpose: The Residential Zone (R-1) is established for low density single family dwellings. It is further intended to prohibit the development of incompatible uses that are detrimental to the residential environment. - 4-31-36:A: Purpose: The purpose of the conditional use permit is to allow certain uses in districts from which they are normally prohibited by this Chapter when the proposed uses are deemed consistent with other existing and potential use within the general area of the proposed use. Except as provided in this Section, a conditional use permit may not reduce the requirements of the zone in which the use is located. 4-31-36:B: Conditional Use Permit: The Hearing Examiner may grant, with or without conditions, or deny the conditional use permit pursuant to Chapter 8, Title IV of the City Code. The Hearing Examiner may limit the term and duration of the conditional use permit. Conditions imposed by the Hearing Examiner shall reasonably assure that nuisance or hazard to life or property will not develop. 4-31-36:C:2 Community Need: There shall be a community need for the proposed use at the proposed location. In determination of community need the Hearing Examiner shall consider the following factors, among other relevant information: a. The proposed location shall not result in either the detrimental over concentration of a particular use within the City or within the immediate area of the proposed use. 4-31-36:C:4 Compatibility: The proposed use shall be compatible with the residential scale and character of the neighborhood. • DECLARATIONS BY AGGRIEVED NEIGHBORS We oppose applicant's request to expand his facility because we live close to applicant's church and experience adverse effects from applicant's enterprise level activities upon the enjoyment, comfort, and convenience of our property, 4-31-36:A: . Enough is enough. The proposed expansion together with applicant's objective to be the regions "equipping" and "sending" organization produce a use incompatible with the residential scale and character of our neighborhood, 4-31-36:C:4. With more space, larger Christian Crusades will most likely result bringing with them a "if(ingdome" atmosphere to the neighborhood, 4-31-36:B: . In the obscure use of the added class room capacity, we see a latent threat that a formal Christian School is planned later (the church already has two school busses) . Then, to top it off, we are faced with the already announced plans for a new 1500 seat sanctuary as well as the conversion of the old sanctuary to more class rooms. It is applicant's conjecture that the community benefits from the planned expansion, however, we see the opposite as the case. For with expansion, comes increased noise and dust at all hours as well as overflow street parking and traffic congestion. Inherent conditions that are detrimental to the neighborhood residential quality, 4-31-5:A: . We see very few people in the neighborhood attend the Church, consequently, the expansion doesn't serve the neighborhood at all, 4-31-36:C:2. We conclude that the expanded facility is to be filled through "aggressive outreach" beyond the immediate neighborhood and community at a 'cost of property rights attrition for Church neighbors, 4-31-36:B. We object. We citizens of the Renton Highlands community point out that within the Highlands area 17 churches offer services for their followers. In the locale of the Highland's Community Church, there are seven churches within walking distance. Any expansion would further inbalance an inured over concentrated condition that already exists, 4-31-36:C:2.a. RELIEF SOUGHT We request that the Hearing Examiner deny the conditional use permit for this expansion. The action would preserve the integrity of our neighborhood so that we adjacent neighbors could coexist with the Church without further attrition . of our property rights. PRINTED NAME I SIGNATURE I ADDRESS I ZIP CODE I DATE 1• ZZ:44-4, t-47..ze.;e÷ e AeTI 4•. 5. 6. _____..____________.__..__.___._.___.__._ _...._..__._.__....._-.••----------•--•-•-------_•. ----.-----._ __.._..._.-.._...---•--_..._..._..._._.____..__..___.___ _._..__._..._.__ _.--- i 7. B. 9. 10. • 7kC3 PETITION BY THE NEIGHBORS OPPOSING EXPANSION OF THE HIGHLAND'S COMMUNITY CHURCH To: The Hearing Examiner, City of Renton: We neighbors of the Highland's Community Church oppose granting a conditional use permit for an expanded church. Applicant's Church is located at 3031 N.E.10th Street in a district zoned R-1. As neighbors, we seek relief from the 1 detrimental effects of the proposal to expand by 11900 square feet the predominant structure in the neighborhood. RENTON ZONING CODE SECTIONS/PARAGRAPHS THAT FORM THE BASIS FOR RELIEF SOUGHT 4-31-5:A: Purpose: The Residential Zone (R-1) is established for low density single family dwellings. It is further intended to prohibit the development of incompatible uses that are detrimental to the residential environment. 4-31-36:A: Purpose: The purpose of the conditional use permit is to allow certain uses in districts from which they are normally' prohibited by this Chapter when the proposed uses are deemed consistent with other existing and potential use within the general area of the proposed use. Except as provided in this Section, a conditional use permit may not reduce the requirements of the zone in which the use is located. 4-31-36:B: Conditional Use Permit: The Hearing Examiner may grant, with or without conditions, or deny the conditional use permit pursuant to Chapter 8, Title IV of the City Code. The Hearing Examiner may limit the term and duration of the conditional use permit. Conditions imposed by the Hearing Examiner shall reasonably assure that nuisance or hazard to life or property will not develop. 4-31-36:C:2 Community Need: There shall be a community need for the proposed use at the proposed location. In determination of community need the Hearing Examiner shall consider the following factors, among other relevant information: a. The proposed location shall not result in either the detrimental over concentration of a particular use within the City or within the immediate area of the proposed. use. 4-31-36:C:4 Compatibility: The proposed use shall be compatible with the residential scale and character of the neighborhood. DECLARATIONS BY AGGRIEVED NEIGHBORS i We oppose applicant's request to expand his facility because we live close to applicant's church and experience adverse effects from applicant's enterprise level activities upon the enjoyment, comfort, and convenience of our property, 4-31-36:A: . Enough is enough. The proposed expansion together with applicant's objective to be the regions "equipping" and "sending" organization produce a use incompatible with the residential scale and character of our neighborhood, 4-31-36:C:4. With more space, larger Christian Crusades will most likely result bringing with them a "Kingdome" atmosphere to the neighborhood, 4-31-36:B: . In the obscure use of the added class room capacity, we see a latent threat that a formal Christian School is planned later (the church already has two school busses) . Then, to top it off, we are faced with the already announced plans for a new 1500 seat sanctuary as well as the conversion of the old sanctuary to more class rooms. • It is applicant's conjecture that the community benefits from the planned expansion, however, we see the opposite as the case. For with expansion, comes increased noise and dust at all hours as well as overflow street parking and traffic congestion. Inherent conditions that are detrimental to the neighborhood residential quality, 4-31-5:A: . We see very few people in the neighborhood attend the Church, consequently, the expansion doesn't serve the neighborhood at all, 4-31-36:C:2. We conclude that the expanded facility is to be filled through "aggressive outreach" beyond the immediate neighborhood and community at a cost of property rights attrition for Church neighbors, 4-31-36:B. We object. We citizens of the Renton Highlands community point out that within the Highlands area 17 churches offer services for their followers. In the locale of the Highland's Community Church, there are seven churches within walking distance. Any expansion would further inbalance an inured over concentrated condition that already exists, 4-31-36:C:2.a. RELIEF SOUGHT We request that the Hearing Examiner deny the conditional use permit for this expansion. The action would preserve the integrity of our neighborhood so that we adjacent neighbors could coexist with the Church without further attrition of our property rights. PRINTED NAME I SIGNATURE I ADDRESS I ZIP CODE I DATE 2. _ _ cu.", '90 be4.144-M2A21,1iL„..1ZeitiThl Ain yotno 47(/. rip Eizziaivp 04 980.st 4_0), ;. ._�� 'D�� ._._ � !�y..__. y� _._._. _...___ . ._ l..°y... eK_440/4._ . rya - . ' .. zetv�"v._ r- .. _.. iv.o._ S'•ZS•1 ,,.. MiatefAsitEtu Priclt(R/ oi(PActevvo4kfigA.9" ctoti_VA,a4,...ctaAtkt PRAAt cloS"-G 5..._t_44-RD_ 7): 4-_,Fc.,4- 14' "vi;• 70 9/ 14)4/71/1 1o. ( • '3(e067 .7)6 leS1 A/2_47 gFo—G 7, 61. jtia, .., p.e.04-, ?ire 5-6 /AI 6"61«•'!A'•_I' �!y. .le!!6.i►_y� ___ _ __ _ =.= _ — _ !_!`/ ... _.S�!- r.'v.L'__ 'f.!IcWC ._1I�.�. ._del- (f 11 9. tis 10. F r XC4 PETITION BY THE NEIGHBORS OPPOSING EXPANSION OF THE HIGHLAND'S COMMUNITY CHURCH To: The Hearing Examiner, City of Renton: We neighbors of the Highland's Community Church oppose granting a conditional use permit for an expanded church. Applicant's Church is located at 3031 N.E.10th Street in a district zoned R-1. As neighbors, we seek relief from the detrimental effects of the proposal to expand by 11900 square feet the predominant structure in the neighborhood. RENTON ZONING CODE SECTIONS/PARAGRAPHS THAT FORM THE BASIS FOR RELIEF SOUGHT 4-31-5:A: Purpose: The Residential Zone (R-1) is established for low density single family dwellings. It is further intended to prohibit the development of incompatible uses that are detrimental to the residential environment. 4-31-36:A: Purpose: The purpose of the conditional use permit is to allow certain uses 'in districts from which they are normally prohibited by this Chapter when the proposed uses are deemed consistent with other existing and potential use within the general area of the proposed use. Except as provided in this. Section, a conditional use permit may not reduce the requirements of the zone in which the use is located. 4-31-36:B: Conditional Use Permit: The Hearing Examiner may grant, with or without conditions, or deny the conditional use permit pursuant to Chapter 8, Title IV of the City Code. The Hearing Examiner may limit the. term and duration of the conditional use permit. Conditions imposed by the Hearing Examiner shall reasonably assure that nuisance or hazard to life or property will not develop. 4-31-36:C:2 Community Need: There shall be a community need for the proposed use at the proposed location. In dltermination of community need the Hearing Examiner shall consider the following factors, among other relevant information: a. The';.pr'oposed location shall not result in either the detrimental over'concentration of a particular use within the City or 'within the immediate area of the proposed use. 4-31-36:C:4 Compatibility: The proposed use shall be compatible with the residential scale and character of the neighborhood. DECLARATIONS BY AGGRIEVED NEIGHBORS We oppose applicant's request to expand his facility because we live close to applicant's church and experience adverse effects from applicant's enterprise level activities upon the enjoyment, comfort, and convenience of our property, 4-31-36:A: . Enough is enough. The proposed expansion together with applicant's objective to be the regions "equipping" and "sending" organization produce a use incompatible with the residential scale and character of our neighborhood, 4-31-36:C:4. With more space, larger Christian Crusades will most likely result bringing with them a "Kingdome" atmosphere to the neighborhood, 4-31-36:B: . In the obscure use of the added class room capacity, we see a latent threat that a formal Christian School is planned later (the church already has two school busses) . Then, to top it off, we are faced with the already announced plans for a new 1500 seat sanctuary as well as the conversion of the old sanctuary to more class rooms. It is applicant's conjecture that the community benefits from the planned expansion, however, we see the opposite as the case. For with expansion, comes increased noise and dust at all hours as well as overflow street parking and traffic congestion. Inherent conditions that are detrimental to the neighborhood residential quality, 4-31-5:A: . We see very few people in the neighborhood attend the Church, consequently, the expansion doesn't serve the neighborhood at all, 4-31-36:C:2. We conclude that the expanded facility is to be filled through "aggressive outreach" beyond the immediate neighborhood and community at a cost of property rights attrition for Church neighbors, 4-31-36:B. We object. We citizens of the Renton Highlands community point out that within the Highlands area 17 churches offer services for their followers. In the locale of the Highland's Community Church, there are seven churches within walking distance. Any expansion would further inbalance an inured over concentrated condition that already exists, 4-31-36:C:2.a. RELIEF SOUGHT i We request that the Hearing Examiner deny the conditional use permit for this expansion. The action would preserve the integrity of our neighborhood so that we adjacent neighbors could coexist with the Church without further attrition of our property rights. PRINTED NAME I SIGNATURE I ADDRESS I ZIP CODE I DATE /9/el/ /671,7-‘ -747 6W,— 62 ...$ -- ----it—C-11/4„),' '4:27:7,27'2',464-4 IF' i&, --c 6/_‘,-)6 • 0 , G191'54 c:53/ 7/1Y% S e//A5r 71566- ‘//S. 4% 3.HE A F /9 _ rtfy r,',1_ .^ - Cp. - J--_-_ 3 3 l 1 AA.d. I 1 a 97",D"4- ‘'//24c / 4.------ .._ J. 7. ':- - 10. '�C S PETITION BY THE NEIGHBORS OPPOSING EXPANSION OF THE HIGHLAND'S COMMUNITY CHURCH• To: The Hearing Examiner, City of Renton: We neighbors of the Highland's Community Church oppose granting a conditional use permit for an expanded church. Applicant's Church is located at 3031 N.E.10th Street in a district zoned R-1. As neighbors, we seek relief from the detrimental effects of the proposal to expand by 11900 square feet the predominant structure in the neighborhood. RENTON ZONING CODE SECTIONS/PARAGRAPHS THAT FORM THE BASIS FOR RELIEF SOUGHT 4-31-5:A: Purpose: The Residential Zone (R-1) is established for low density single family dwellings. It is further intended to prohibit the development of incompatible uses that are detrimental to the residential environment. 4-31-36:A: Purpose: The purpose of the conditional use permit is to allow certain uses in districts from which they are normally prohibited by this Chapter when the proposed uses are deemed consistent with other existing and potential use within the general area of the proposed use. Except as provided in thiaSection, a conditional use permit may not reduce the requirements of the zone in which the use is located. 4-31-36:B: Conditional Use Permit: The Hearing Examiner may grant, with or without conditions, or deny, the conditional use permit pursuant to Chapter 8, Title IV of the City Code. The Hearing Examiner may limit the term' and duration of the conditional use permit. Conditions imposed by the Hearing Examiner shall reasonably assure that nuisance or hazard to life or property will not develop. 4-31-36:C:2 Community Need: There shall be a community need for the, proposed use at the proposed location. In ' determination of community need the Hearing Examiner shall consider the following factors, among other relevant information: a. The proposed location shall not result in either the detrimental over concentration of a particular use within the City or within the immediate area of the proposed use. 4-31-36:C:4 Compatibility: The proposed use shall be compatible with the residential scale and character of the neighborhood. DECLARATIONS BY AGGRIEVED NEIGHBORS We oppose applicant's request to expand his facility because we live close to applicant's church and experience adverse effects from applicant's enterprise level activities upon the enjoyment, comfort, and convenience of our property, 4-31-36:A: . Enough is enough. The proposed expansion together with applicant's objective to be the regions "equipping" and "sending" organization produce a use incompatible with the residential scale and character of our neighborhood, 4-31-36:C:4. With more space, larger Christian Crusades will most likely result bringing with them a "Kingdome" atmosphere to the neighborhood, 4-31-36:B: . In the obscure use of the added class room capacity, we see a latent threat that a formal Christian School is planned later (the church already has two school busses) . Then, to top it off, we are faced with the already announced plans for a new 1500 seat sanctuary as well as the conversion of the old sanctuary to more class rooms. It is applicant's conjecture that the community benefits from the planned expansion, however, we see the opposite as the case. For with expansion, comes increased noise and dust at all hours as well as overflow street parking and traffic congestion. Inherent conditions that are detrimental to the neighborhood residential quality, 4-31-5:A: . We see very few people in the neighborhood attend the Church, consequently, the expansion doesn't serve the neighborhood at all, 4-31-36:C:2. We conclude that the expanded facility is to be filled through "aggressive outreach" beyond the immediate neighborhood and community at a cost of property rights attrition for Church neighbors, 4-31-36:B. We object. We citizens of the Renton Highlands community point out that within the Highlands area 17 churches offer services for their followers. In the locale of the Highland's Community Church, there are seven churches within walking distance. Any expansion would further inbalance an inured over concentrated condition that already exists, 4-31-36:C:2.a. RELIEF SOUGHT We request that the Hearing Examiner deny the conditional use permit for this expansion. The action would preserve the integrity of our neighborhood so that we adjacent neighbors could coexist with the Church without further attrition of our property rights. PRINTED NAME I SIGNATURE I ADDRESS I ZIP CODE I DATE 1. leZs L-/LSa,ez/ ��_ _ -- �'� �15 l✓ir/��(/L-- --- geoSSo 5-/6- G/ • ri 2-16/€1C1111M46- gea_C-6 548 1--/g/eVer g3Z-Vb/rm _VP" / 5- 4.q_cd.__71/e_Jk__,>z $ L_,220_1&je4-1^"-S)4 IX -561i 9- 6. _illAkbYL Milt k/ --- .�ALAI, / 1...e.t. I ICSo-A) c__ 8- Q r eAkes - e ,det,7,6 or,,3 o gre:_fe,r,s-oN Al E 9`7o 794 9. 10. • )ce(o PETITION BY THE NEIGHBORS OPPOSING EXPANSION OF THE HIGHLAND'S COMMUNITY CHURCH To: The Hearing Examiner, City of Renton: We neighbors of the Highland's Community Church oppose granting a conditional use permit for an expanded church. Applicant's Church is located at 3031 N.E.10th Street in a district zoned R-1. As neighbors, we seek relief from the detrimental effects of the proposal to expand by 11900 square feet the predominant structure in the neighborhood. RENTON ZONING CODE SECTIONS/PARAGRAPHS THAT FORM THE BASIS FOR RELIEF SOUGHT 4-31-5:A: Purpose: The Residential Zone (R-1) is established for low density single family dwellings. It is further intended to prohibit the development of incompatible uses that are detrimental to the residential environment. 4-31-36:A: Purpose: The purpose of the conditional use permit is to allow certain uses in districts from which they are normally prohibited by this Chapter when the proposed uses are deemed consistent with other existing and potential use within the general area of the proposed use. Except as provided in this Section, a conditional use permit may not reduce the requirements of the zone in which the use is located. 4-31-36:B: Conditional Use Permit: The Hearing Examiner may grant, with or without conditions, or deny the conditional use permit pursuant to Chapter 8, Title IV of the City Code. The Hearing Examiner may limit the term and duration of the conditional use permit. Conditions imposed by the Hearing Examiner shall reasonably assure that nuisance or hazard to life or property will not develop. 4-31-36:C:2 Community Need: There shall be a community need for the proposed use at the proposed location. In determination of community need the Hearing Examiner shall consider the following factors,. among other relevant information: a. The proposed location shall not result in either the detrimental over concentration of a particular use within the City or within the immediate area of the proposed use. 4-31-36:C:4 Compatibility: The proposed use shall be compatible with the residential scale and character of the neighborhood. DECLARATIONS BY AGGRIEVED NEIGHBORS We oppose applicant's request to expand his facility because we live close to applicant's church and experience adverse effects from applicant's enterprise level activities upon the enjoyment, comfort, and convenience of our property. 4-31-36:A: . Enough is enough. The proposed expansion together with applicant's objective to be the regions "equipping" and "sending" organization produce a use incompatible with the residential scale and character of our neighborhood, 4-31-36:C:4. With more space, larger Christian Crusades will most likely result bringing with them a "Kingdome" atmosphere to the neighborhood, 4-31-36:B: . In the obscure use of the added class room capacity, we see a latent threat that a formal Christian School is planned later (the church already has two school busses) . Then, to top it off, we are faced with the already announced plans for a new 1500 seat sanctuary as well as the conversion of the old sanctuary to more class rooms. It is applicant's conjecture that the community benefits from the planned expansion, however, we see the opposite as to case. For with expansion, comes increased noise and dust at all hours as well as overflow street parking and traffic congestion. Inherent conditions that are detrimental to the neighborhood residential quality, 4-31-5:A: . We see very few people in the neighborhood attend the Church, consequently, the expansion doesn't serve the neighborhood at all, 4-31-36:C:2. We conclude that the expanded facility is to be filled through "aggressive outreach" beyond the immediate neighborhood and community at a cost of property rights attrition for Church neighbors, 4-31-36:B. We object. We citizens of the Renton Highlands community point out that within the Highlands area 17 churches offer services for their followers. In the locale of the Highland's Community Church, there are seven churches within walking distance. Any expansion would further inbalance an inured over concentrated condition that already exists, 4-31-36:C:2.a. RELIEF SOUGHT We request that the Hearing Examiner deny the conditional use permit for this expansion. The action would preserve the integrity of our neighborhood so that we adjacent neighbors could coexist with the Church without further attrition of our property rights. PRINTED NAME 1 SIGNATURE I ADDRESS I ZIP CODE I DATE 1-LJW.-L- La-t-LCko_er Ai/12 k/eid 4_,Ate vag 4A, 2-. 5-1/ Lel.tht &-4/6. /LSI_ .47h V;_,/e/ _ .t_ Z.:2 _ _ 4 2 f/.3/ 5. /fit/s5��r�L _1/cr mac%._.. l��/ 1G1i __- � /'tfl6 x._. ��i /(1Db 066 6/8/9 of 7. • 8. 9. , 1 �, I 1 I I I . I I , 1 il , I I I 1 I I 1 I I 1 I I I II 1 I I ' ' I I I I III I I I' i _ I I I ' a * 0� &�ITTS0 ) - . \2 P�c.�r'� ` y c i -r\'\� 11 „ �C0(Y) � I 1 $1e i s2 s1G�� • I �, } I 1 i • li ! 1 . I . . 1 , . 1 1 I 1 1 1 I . 1 1 1 . 1 1 . 1 1 , I I 1 . 1 i I I 1 I. 1 1 _ I ' , 1 I 1 1 , I 1 I I i i I I 1 I 1 1 . 1 I I . I • 1 1 EA' HIBIT 1'4 PETITION BY NEIGHBORS OF THE HIGHLAND'S COMMUNITY CHURCH OPPOSING REZONE OF BLOCK 32 To: The Hearing Examiner, City of Renton: The City Council , City of Renton: We neighbors of the Highland's Community Church oppose any change to Block 32 zoning. The - Church is located by conditional use permit at 3031 N.E. 10th Street (block 32) of Renton in an area zoned R-1 residential . Applicant seeks to rezone Block 32 from R-1 to a P-1 . As affected neighbors, we seek relief from applicant's proposal to rezone Block 32 and to expand (11900 square feet) the dominant structure in the neighborhood. RENTON CODE (SECTIONS/PARAGRAPHS) THAT FORM THE BASIS FOR RELIEF SOUGHT 4-31-5:A: Purpose: The Residential Zone (R-1) is established for low density single family dwellings. It is further intended to prohibit the development of incompatible uses that are detrimental to the residential environment. 4-3-2:C: The plan is, of necessity, general in its proposals. It must be flexible, since it is impossible to predict all future events which may affect the community. The plan is not a development ordinance, although it makes significant recommendations for future land use. The plan is not precise. It does not present engineering accuracy, nor does it claim to predict exactly the future of every parcel of property, or insure that growth is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. It is not intended to retroactively impose compliance with goals , objectives, and policies upon existing developed property, but voluntary compliance is encouraged. PRECEDENT FOR SELECTIVE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN IMPLEMENTATION Applicant's rezone application is selective in compliance with the Comprehensive Plan. Documentation is available indicating that the City Staff supports this interpretation. Reference City of Renton memo dated March 14,1990. OBJECTIONS BY AGGRIEVED NEIGHBORS 1 We live in close proximity to applicant's church . Consequently, we experience first hand the adverse effects of applicant' s enterprise-level-church-activities upon the enjoyment, comfort, and convenience of our property. More expansion would only bring more attrition of our property rights.. We object to a rezone from R-1 to P-1 because rezone would allow the Church's escape from residential zone regulation (4-31-5:A) . We need that protection . And further, when compared to R-1 , P-1 zoning includes relaxed developmental standards for building height and lot coverage. Since applicant has already announced plans for a new 1500 seat sanctuary (location of choice, Block 32) , a rezone to P-1 would develop the threat that the new sanctuary would be sited on Block 32. Truly, a location that would be a detriment to the adjacent residents due to size and closeness . Applicant justifies the rezone on the basis of Comprehensive Plan compliance. With City Staff concurrence (reference City of Renton Memo dated March 14, 1990) . the westerly portion of Church land is excluded from the rezone application. We neighbors contend that applicants compliance is made on a selective basis. To be consistent, we neighbors demand the same exclusionary rights from Comprehensive Plan compliance. However, we seek an opposite position. A position leaving Block 32 zoning as it is. Clearly, a position that is allowed by 4-3-2:C: . As adjacent neighbors, we seek assurances that the residential character of our neighborhood will be preserved. We seek to coexist with a residential scale Highland's Community Church while enjoying the comfort and convenience of our residential property. RELIEF SOUGHT We request that the Hearing Examiner recommend against granting the rezone. We ask that the City Council concur and finalize the denial for rezone. A denial would preserve the residential character of our neighborhood. Such action would allow the adjacent neighbors to coexist with the Church . without further attrition of their property rights. PRINTED NAME I SIGNATURE I ADDRESS I ZIP CODE I DATE - 1:17-mti 141,40171-641111 ‘111 _J. __rght e, �lc'e! rae-s- ofa vs- .pd2g-zA--4--i .4Z-Zal /'61' de-t grd 5" i/F/1/ 4.5-TA,Jl _f1'.-.Alb4e t' �� 1C� ' �._.__.._.. _-._......G e q.L 9 3 a 57d �'/.� 5. ° 1 ,( - Ci�z/ �-� � ��Q�E N ) ? �� - - - / l am, .4-)a;caclOO&C.- V `g 4-6 ?f "mil /1 1, ✓� VO C r C e 6.-- �?SS`�LL �, ��c+�C'�t/'r �(�'vv�vG .� � �i � d� `C�Nso ;.. ��� �t/.C', f$��5�_- Sib // 7.. , am rl_�_r__l % i�,_p/l. �'��� �. G� G-. . fG B. 7g L_.• _.._.�l!._0./.3 -. ._.._.._._.___...� -� �1a -- moo o '-� 1`_'roraz � . �- _ 1 Z ' PETITION BY NEIGHBORS OF THE HIGHLAND'S COMMUNITY CHURCH OPPOSING REZONE OF BLOCK 32 To: The Hearing Examiner, City of Renton: The City Council , City of Renton : We neighbors of the Highland's Community Church oppose any change to Block 32 zoning. The Church is located by conditional use permit at 3031 N.E. 1Oth Street (block 32) of Renton in an area zoned R-1 residential. Applicant seeks to rezone Block 32 from R-1 to a P-1 . As affected neighbors, we seek relief from applicant's proposal to rezone Block 32 and to expand (11900 square feet) the dominant structure in the neighborhood. RENTON CODE (SECTIONS/PARAGRAPHS) THAT FORM THE BASIS FOR RELIEF SOUGHT 4-31-5:A: Purpose: The Residential Zone (R-1) is established for low density single family dwellings. It is further intended to prohibit the development of incompatible uses that are detrimental to the residential environment. 4-3-2:C: The plan is, of necessity, general in its proposals. It must be flexible, since it is impossible to predict all future events which may affect the community. The plan is not a development ordinance, although it makes significant recommendations for future land use. The plan is not precise. It does not present engineering accuracy, nor does it claim to predict exactly the future of every parcel of property, or insure that growth is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. It is not intended to retroactively impose compliance with goals , objectives, and policies upon existing developed property, but voluntary compliance is encouraged. PRECEDENT FOR SELECTIVE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN IMPLEMENTATION Applicant's rezone application is selective in compliance with the Comprehensive Plan. Documentation is available indicating that the City Staff supports this interpretation. Reference City of Renton memo dated March 14,1990. OBJECTIONS BY AGGRIEVED NEIGHBORS We live in close proximity to applicant's church . Consequently, we experience first hand the adverse effects of applicant's enterprise-level-church-activities upon the enjoyment, comfort, and convenience of our property. More expansion would only bring more attrition of our property rights. We object to a rezone from R-1 to P-1 because rezone would allow the Church' s escape from residential zone regulation (4-31-5:A) . We need that protection . And further, when compared to R-1 , P-1 zoning includes relaxed developmental standards for building height and lot coverage. Since applicant has already announced plans for a new 1500 seat sanctuary (location of choice, Block 32) , a rezone to P-1 would develop the threat that the new sanctuary would be sited on Block 32. Truly, a location that would be a detriment to the adjacent residents due to size and closeness . Applicant justifies the rezone on the basis of Comprehensive Plan compliance. With City Staff concurrence (reference City of Renton Memo dated March 14,1990) , the westerly portion of Church land is excluded from the rezone application. We neighbors contend that applicants compliance is made on a selective basis. To be consistent, we neighbors demand the same exclusionary rights from Comprehensive Plan compliance. However, we seek an opposite position. A position leaving Block 32 zoning as it is. Clearly, a position that is allowed by 4-3-2:C: . As adjacent neighbors, we seek assurances that the residential character of our neighborhood will be preserved. We seek to coexist with a residential scale Highland's Community Church while enjoying the comfort and convenience of our residential property. RELIEF SOUGHT We request that the Hearing Examiner recommend against granting the rezone. We ask that the City Council concur and finalize the denial for rezone. A denial would preserve the residential character of our neighborhood. Such action would allow the adjacent neighbors to coexist with the Church without further attrition of their property rights. PRINTED NAME I SIGNATURE I ADDRESS I ZIP CODE I DATE 11- _.1_x_L .I iti_L..E 4p.P.-----_ - 61-4,i4,./ 5. -9* _S1L ?- ME..f? . 9 ees6 1 ., PLi4:f _4_.11 .LSt _- - t__ - _ 9 �� ,�� __Avg_�vi 9�051 _s -.a fr fc !f ‘1 3. 'D-ez-4711-a1'i a ____11 cub 4 \il ' 5 4 4. "j_.___e„.AL.1,2_ ____ _ _M-77. .___ ___ .. ____ I:0_0. _____ _.______Li_P___6_ gO---Z _rlepA J 5. Gil yft# ai J G2P6CS ..._. f aG 4� A4r, 1 Ct6ri,j '. a Li US. .J r ___--- - :q._1 ,,--_:_ Px 7 - < _ &5s / 7.G 111?/,5 PiQ1W9511 S at4iLegia' 8344 L A(A/1✓Qo ll // 8.__"1-1-')...""`A_.. .(7{. .... .11-\ t-1"3°'Av-1"--1-' .t1-1---,--c."------(1 - -r: -c-.4 e-A---t-----" (3 L.,,,,, ,,,.0,d_ A-v ...)1.,c, ..... 3'615.(,......_. 5_sir 1 q 3'LAi I see,,<A, ›''---.6-. I LC 71-01.-S c, Ei-z172--- -.• 9 ''Y Ly#.1 IN, k.4, - A(el i.i_tc- 9 i si% --N,j 10. A pCo i"J p_._./• CY e elf_ -_ .--._.Y .-.._. _7 Je)__._. i.n.coO.Q c!_.._Aipe_-/it..._.. _?go6.--- • "...cfht • _ . . 23 PETITION BY NEIGHBORS OF THE HIGHLAND'S COMMUNITY CHURCH OPPOSING REZONE OF BLOCK 32 To: The Hearing Examiner, City of Renton: The City Council , City of Renton: We neighbors of the Highland's Community Church oppose any change to Block 32 zoning. The • Church is located by conditional use permit at 3031 N.E. 1Oth Street (block 32) of Renton in an area zoned R-1 residential . Applicant seeks to rezone Block 32 from R-1 to a P-1 . As affected neighbors, we seek relief from applicant's proposal to rezone Block 32 and to expand (11900 square feet) the dominant structure in the neighborhood. RENTON CODE (SECTIONS/PARAGRAPHS) THAT FORM THE BASIS FOR RELIEF SOUGHT 4-31-5:A: Purpose: The Residential Zone (R-1) is established for low density single family dwellings. It is further intended to prohibit the development of incompatible uses that are detrimental to the residential environment. 4-3-2:C: The plan is, of necessity, general in its proposals. It must be flexible, since it is impossible to predict all future events which may affect the community. The plan is not a development ordinance, although it makes significant recommendations for future land use. The plan is not precise. It does not present engineering accuracy, nor does it claim to predict exactly the future of every parcel of property, or insure that growth is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. It is not intended to retroactively impose compliance with goals , objectives, and policies upon existing developed property, but voluntary compliance is encouraged. PRECEDENT FOR SELECTIVE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN IMPLEMENTATION Applicant's rezone application is selective in compliance with the Comprehensive Plan. Documentation is available indicating that the City Staff supports this interpretation. Reference City of Renton memo dated March 14,1990. OBJECTIONS BY AGGRIEVED NEIGHBORS , We live in._close proximity to applicant's church. Consequently, we experience first hand the . adverse effects of applicant's enterprise-level-church-activities upon the enjoyment, comfort, .and convenience of our property. More expansion would only bring more attrition of our property rights. We object to a rezone from R-1 to P-1 because rezone would allow the Church' s escape from residential zone regulation (4-31-5:A).. We need that protection. And further, when compared to R-1 , P-1 zoning includes relaxed developmental standards for building height and lot coverage. Since applicant has already announced plans for a new 1500 seat sanctuary (location of choice, Block 32) , a rezone to P-1 would develop the threat that the new sanctuary would be sited on Block 32. Truly, a location that would be a detriment to the adjacent residents due to size and closeness. Applicant justifies the rezone on the basis of Comprehensive Plan compliance. With City Staff concurrence (reference City of Renton Memo dated March 14,1990) , the westerly portion of Church land his excluded from the rezone application. We neighbors contend that applicants compliance is made on selective basis. To be consistent, we neighbors demand the same exclusionary rights from Comprehensive Plan compliance. However, we seek an opposite position. A position leaving Block 32 zoning as it is. Clearly, a position that is allowed by 4-3-2:C: . As adjacent neighbors, we seek assurances that the residential character of our neighborhood will be preserved. We seek to coexist with a residential scale Highland' s Community Church while enjoying the comfort and convenience of our residential property. RELIEF SOUGHT We request that the Hearing Examiner recommend against granting the rezone . We ask that the City Council concur and finalize the denial for rezone. A denial would preserve the residential character of our neighborhood. Such action would allow the adjacent neighbors to coexist with the Church without further attrition of their property rights. PRINTED NAME I SIGNATURE I ADDRESS I ZIP CODE I DATE ' GS E11 L. 'tf- '�' � ��(�d dtio id c- `'j .e gd c7, L5 ._.7 /, 6 -,v , z _ 7 :2 ,,.„ )ti / ? ,/fr�LAS�C�rC-�JZC�.� ,��. __�! ( �1LL�l�v4 �✓[e ,le:_ 4. 11 5 ._ r nn � � 6. L) I1_.__J._[_CL L ��-- _ '?r�.4_-/.__.._-- -G � �� C -�-__ � �6--/_Y,/��, 7. CG16-7L-�/iI . M/(Ayyg /q/ e.127.0 z'1 � �( h lA.A �/�(�'C � -.._f ' t 'tf 5 ' �l -r?c�, )_ c'_ 12" c Sled" ' - am_ qg rtl )tec ._._. `' o.a6._ 5 `�. 61 qt. ��k�Lr%,�__ at� '�So;�___ �. : f � �w _... ? ._.. ...�,.y zu.,6,1.0('.. ?, 1 C %��% �� .._..... . 7/i/ \- PETITION BY NEIGHBORS OF THE HIGHLAND'S COMMUNITY CHURCH OPPOSING REZONE OF BLOCK 32 To: The Hearing Examiner, City of Renton: The City Council, City of Renton : We neighbors of the Highland's Community Church oppose any change to Block 32 zoning. The • Church is located by conditional use permit at 3031 N.E. 1Oth Street (block 32) of Renton in an area zoned R-1 residential . Applicant seeks to rezone Block 32 from R-1 to a P-1 . As affected neighbors, we seek relief from applicant's proposal to rezone Block 32 and to expand (11900 square feet) the dominant structure in the neighborhood. RENTON CODE (SECTIONS/PARAGRAPHS) THAT FORM THE BASIS FOR RELIEF SOUGHT 4-31-5:A: Purpose: The Residential. Zone (R-1) is established for low density single family dwellings. It is further intended to prohibit the development of incompatible uses that are detrimental to the residential environment. 4-3-2:C: The plan is, of necessity, general in its proposals. It must be flexible, since it is impossible to predict all future events which may affect the community. The plan is not a development ordinance, although it makes significant recommendations for future land use. The plan is not precise. It does not present engineering accuracy, nor does it claim to predict exactly the future of every parcel of property, or insure that growth is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. It is not intended to retroactively impose compliance with goals , objectives, and policies upon existing developed property, but voluntary compliance is encouraged. PRECEDENT FOR SELECTIVE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN IMPLEMENTATION Applicant's rezone application is selective in compliance with the Comprehensive Plan. Documentation is available indicating that the City Staff supports this interpretation. Reference City of Renton memo dated March 14,1990. OBJECTIONS BY AGGRIEVED NEIGHBORS We live in close proximity to applicant's church. Consequently, we experience first hand the adverse effects of applicant's enterprise-level-church-activities upon the enjoyment, comfort, and convenience of our property. More expansion would only bring more attrition of our property rights. We object to a rezone from R-1 to P-1 because rezone would allow the Church's escape from residential zone regulation (4-31-5:A) . We need that protection . And further , when compared to R-1 , P-1 zoning includes relaxed developmental standards for building height and lot coverage. Since applicant has already announced plans for a new 1500 seat sanctuary (location of choice, Block 32) , a rezone to P-1 would develop the threat that the new sanctuary would be sited on Block 32. Truly, a ,location that would be a detriment to the adjacent residents due to size and closeness . Applicant justifies the rezone on the basis of Comprehensive Plan compliance. With City Staff concurrence (reference City of Renton Memo dated March 14. 1990) , the westerly portion of Church land is excluded from the rezone application. We neighbors contend that applicants compliance is made on a selective basis. To be consistent, we neighbors demand the same exclusionary rights from Comprehensive Plan compliance. However, we seek an opposite position . A position leaving Block 32 zoning as it is. Clearly, a position that is allowed by 4-3-2:C: . As adjacent neighbors, we seek assurances that the residential character of our neighborhood will be preserved. We seek to coexist with a residential scale Highland' s Community Church while enjoying the comfort and convenience of our residential property. RELIEF SOUGHT We request that the Hearing Examiner recommend against granting the rezone . We ask that the City Council concur and finalize the denial for rezone . A denial would preserve the residential character of our neighborhood. Such action would allow the adiacent neighbors to coexist with the Church without further attrition of their property rights. PRINTED NAME I SIGNATURE I ADDRESS I ZIP CODE I DATE 1 // i�i� tC:. N'•..,�_ -----'- ---- 'C.lilrr,;r•^._'J". �.. _•_ ! 0Cam:{ J 5/7/1/ :\ey4,-/-/� 1• �.,y )-- J (J 5„wicAgi. 3/12 A16, 9T©5.6 3. r '_c�' .� __ _ r�r� `� aL ./.271_ _Li/4 . (Lt i 4_ . l 6,5-6 .5:9- 9% / / jj," 9.--y1 4.S11 11)- E4/2 pokurn-3 v ‘,641 thih,„ igct 11114/9 At- (7• 1-76-4 ,_-- - RA, L cL....__. __ n(4)0011_.__...__ � �t�_-•-----. EgaSt_- a , ,v / /c- ✓ T1kk rJ"so/l. A „,, /0‘ a l-v,i/v frit0 .N 10 4. 11/ H (VT /.1-49/44-xe-"-- s-/ _._._ L (A_ dos. Yi?/qi 125 PETITION BY NEIGHBORS OF THE HIGHLAND'S COMMUNITY CHURCH OPPOSING REZONE OF BLOCK 32 To: The Hearing Examiner, City of Renton: The City Council, City of Renton : We neighbors of the Highland's Community. Church oppose any change to Block 32 zoning. The Church is located by conditional use permit at 3031 N.E. 1Oth Street (block 32) of Renton in an area zoned R-1 residential . Applicant seeks to rezone Block 32 from R-1 to a P-1 . As affected neighbors, we seek relief from applicant's proposal to rezone Block 32 and to expand (11900 square feet) the dominant structure in the neighborhood. RENTON CODE (SECTIONS/PARAGRAPHS) THAT FORM THE BASIS FOR RELIEF SOUGHT 4-31-5:A: Purpose: The Residential Zone (R-1) is established for low density single family dwellings. It is further intended to prohibit the development of incompatible uses that are detrimental to the residential environment. 4-3-2:C: The plan is, of necessity, general in its proposals. It must be flexible,, since it is impossible to predict all future events which may affect the community. The plan is not a development ordinance, although it makes significant recommendations for future land use. The plan is not precise. It does not present engineering accuracy, nor does it claim to predict exactly the future of every parcel of property, or insure that growth is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. It is not intended to retroactively impose compliance with goals , objectives, and policies upon existing developed property, but voluntary compliance is encouraged. PRECEDENT FOR SELECTIVE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN IMPLEMENTATION Applicant's rezone application is selective in compliance with the Comprehensive Plan. Documentation is available indicating that the City Staff supports this interpretation. Reference City of Renton memo dated March 14,1990. OBJECTIONS BY AGGRIEVED NEIGHBORS We live in close proximity to applicant's church . Consequently, we experience first hand the adverse effects of applicant's enterprise-level-church-activities upon the enjoyment, comfort, and convenience of our property. More expansion would only bring more attrition of our property rights. We object to a rezone from R-1 to P-1 because rezone would allow the Church' s escape from residential zone regulation (4-31-5:A) . We need that protection. And further , when compared to R-1 , - P-1 zoning includes relaxed developmental standards for building height and lot coverage. Since applicant has already announced plans for a new 1500 seat sanctuary ( location of choice, Block 32) , a rezone to P-1 would develop the threat that the new sanctuary would be sited on Block 32. Truly, a location that would be a detriment to the adjacent residents due to size and closeness . Applicant justifies the rezone on the basis of Comprehensive Plan compliance. With City Staff concurrence (reference City of Renton Memo dated March 14,1990) , the westerly portion of Church land is excluded from the rezone application. We neighbors contend that applicants compliance is made on a selective basis. To be consistent, we neighbors demand the same exclusionary rights from Comprehensive Plan compliance. However, we seek an opposite position. A position leaving Block 32 zoning as it is. Clearly, a position that is allowed by 4-3-2:C: . As adjacent neighbors, we seek assurances that the residential character of our neighborhood will be preserved. We seek to coexist with a residential scale Highland' s Community Church while enjoying the comfort and convenience of our residential property. ELIEF SOUGHT We request that the Hearing Examiner recommend against granting the rezone ; We ask that the City Council concur and finalize the denial for rezone. A denial would preserve the residential character of our neighborhood. Such action would allow the adjacent neighbors to coexist with the Church without further attrition of their property rights. PRINTED NAME I SIGNATURE I ADDRESS I ZIP CODE I DATE r 9d51 A 98ese 7gey/ e., d ta a el 3. TA • 71 'at us tj Ejlfesx,i1 6e _14-CQ_.1); 62/ S- 6. _A - -� --1�9pp �� 5 � ' �'��,.) / l 7. I r /�1� 6'�-I°f` }hI1) /1 v 1(/ J11...' 1�r•....._.. - ? `�; 74100. .ty �/r 7 r ��/ _.f1 I pP � �///f�f r Q 8. v0.v\I 1_j�V�c1�U�eS !,%kcc.`�lJ/' � Lev woo;{J- ,'�v�_ �r /M el. _n .v ___.tynAsov �,..._..._. .. ._. . __. L-yi.ho,),..v40. __..._.._._.__.. epic, Air,..._.. eoco _... 5_/...71. L 2c PETITION BY NEIGHBORS OF THE HIGHLAND'S COMMUNITY CHURCH OPPOSING REZONE OF BLOCK 32 To: The Hearing Examiner, City of Renton: The City Council, City of Renton: We neighbors of the Highland's Community Church oppose any change to Block 32 zoning. The 'Church is located by conditional use permit at 3031 N.E. 1Oth Street (block 32) of Renton in en area zoned R-1 residential . Applicant seeks to rezone Block 32 from R-1 to a P-1 . As affected neighbors, We seek relief from applicant's proposal to rezone Block 32 and to expand (11900 square feet) the dominant structure in the neighborhood. RENTON CODE (SECTIONS/PARAGRAPHS) THAT FORM THE BASIS FOR RELIEF SOUGHT 4-31-5:A: Purpose: The Residential Zone (R-1) is established for low density single family dwellings. It is further intended to prohibit the development of incompatible uses that are detrimental to the residential environment. 4-3-2:C: The plan is, of necessity, general in its proposals. It must be flexible, since it is impossible to predict all future events which may affect the community. The plan is not a development ordinance, although it makes significant recommendations for future land use. The plan is not precise. It does not present engineering accuracy, nor does it claim to predict exactly the future of every parcel of property, or insure that growth is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. It is not intended to retroactively impose compliance with goals , objectives, and policies upon existing developed property, but voluntary compliance is encouraged. PRECEDENT FOR SELECTIVE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN IMPLEMENTATION Applicant's rezone application is selective in compliance with the Comprehensive Plan. Documentation is available indicating that the City Staff supports this interpretation. Reference City of Renton memo dated March 14,1990. OBJECTIONS BY AGGRIEVED NEIGHBORS We live in close proximity to applicant's church . Consequently, we experience first hand the adverse effects of applicant's enterprise-level-church-activities upon the enjoyment, comfort, and convenience of our property. More expansion would only bring more attrition of our property rights. We object to a rezone from R-1 to P-1 because rezone would allow the Church' s escape from residential zone regulation (4-31-5:A) . We need that protection. And further , when compared to R-1 , P-i zoning includes relaxed developmental standards for building height and lot coverage. Since applicant has already announced plans for a new 1500 seat sanctuary (location of choice, Block 32) , a rezone to P-1 would develop the threat that the new sanctuary would be sited on Block 32. Truly, a location that would be a detriment to the adjacent residents due to size and closeness. Applicant justifies the rezone on the basis of Comprehensive Plan compliance. With City Staff concurrence (reference City of Renton Memo dated March 14, 1990) , the westerly portion of Church land is excluded from the rezone application. We neighbors contend that applicants compliance is made on a selective basis. To be consistent, we neighbors demand the same exclusionary rights from Comprehensive Plan compliance. However, we seek an opposite position . A position leaving Block 32 zoning as it is. Clearly, a position that is allowed by 4-3-2:C: . As adjacent neighbors, we seek assurances that the residential character of our neighborhood will be preserved. We seek to coexist with a residential scale Highland' s Community Church while enjoying the comfort and convenience of our residential property. RELIEF SOUGHT We request that the Hearing Examiner recommend against granting the rezone. We ask that the City Council concur and finalize the denial for rezone. A denial would preserve the residential character of our neighborhood. Such action would allow the adjacent neighbors to coexist with the Church without further attrition of their property rights. PRINTED NAME I SIGNATURE I ADDRESS I ZIP CODE I DATE Ren*on 1. M_g. v �A�nne� c new_ CIANANA___6 A_ i_0(41.1— n WQo_d_A _.NG_.___ q$°fib 5144.1 2. A cc.. ner. _ __�Gw_'� G'^- I o t( wavct Ave ME a 0.56, S�.11/ fi „c2 4. 1-17// 4-- 6-24#C—"-() /i• 67_. 6. 7. D. 9. • i . 7 PETITION BY NEIGHBORS OF THE HIGHLAND'S COMMUNITY CHURCH OPPOSING REZONE OF BLOCK 32 To: The Hearing Examiner, City of Renton: The City Council , City of Renton : We neighbors of the Highland's Community Church oppose any change to Block 32 zoning. The Church is located by conditional use permit at 3031 N.E. 1Oth Street (block 32) of Renton in an area zoned R-1 residential . Applicant seeks to rezone Block 32 from R-1 to a P-1 . As affected neighbors, we seek relief from applicant's proposal to rezone Block 32 and to expand (11900 square feet) the dominant structure in the neighborhood. RENTON CODE (SECTIONS/PARAGRAPHS) THAT FORM THE BASIS FOR RELIEF SOUGHT 4-31-5:A: Purpose: The Residential Zone (R-1.) is established for low density single family dwellings. It is further intended to prohibit the development of incompatible uses that are detrimental to the residential environment. 4-3-2:C: The plan is, of necessity, general in its proposals. It must be flexible, since it is impossible to predict all future events which may affect the community. The plan is not a development ordinance, although it makes significant recommendations for future land use. The plan is not precise. It does not present engineering accuracy, nor does it claim to predict exactly the future of every parcel of property, or insure that growth is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. It is not intended to retroactively impose compliance with goals , objectives, and policies upon existing developed property, but voluntary compliance is encouraged. PRECEDENT FOR SELECTIVE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN IMPLEMENTATION Applicant's rezone application is selective in compliance with the Comprehensive Plan. Documentation is available indicating that the City Staff supports this interpretation. Reference City of Renton memo dated March 14,1990. OBJECTIONS BY AGGRIEVED NEIGHBORS We live in close proximity to applicant's church. Consequently, we experience first hand the adverse effects of applicant's enterprise-level-church-activities upon the enjoyment, comfort, and convenience of our property. More expansion would only bring more attrition of our property rights. We object to a rezone from R-1 to P-1 because rezone( would allow the Church's escape from residential zone regulation (4-31-5:A) . We need that protection. And further , when compared to R-1 , P-1 zoning includes relaxed developmental standards forlbuilding height and lot coverage. Since applicant has already announced plans for a new 1500 seat sanctuary ( location of choice, Block 32) , a rezone to P-1 would develop the threat that the new sanctuary would be sited on Block 32. Truly, a location that would be a detriment to the adjacent residents due to size and closeness. Applicant justifies the rezone on the basis of Comprehensive Plan compliance. With City Staff concurrence (reference City of Renton Memo dated March 14,1990) , the westerly portion of Church land is excluded from the rezone application. We neighbors contend that applicants compliance is made on a selective basis. To be consistent, we neighbors demand the same exclusionary rights from Comprehensive Plan compliance. However, we seek an opposite position. A position leaving Block 32 zoning as it is. Clearly, a position that is allowed by 4-3-2:C: . As adjacent neighbors, we seek assurances that the residential character of our neighborhood will be preserved. We seek to coexist with a residential scale Highland' s Community Church while enjoying the comfort and convenience of our residential property. RELIEF SOUGHT We request that the Hearing Examiner recommend against granting the rezone. We ask that the City Council concur and finalize the denial for rezone. A denial would preserve the residential character of our neighborhood. Such action would allow the adjacent neighbors to coexist with the Church without further attrition of their property rights. PRINTED NAME I SIGNATU I ADDRESS I ZIP CODE I DATE 1. 1/4 _ , o yam._ s _ ___ -_ - - � u G� 8 3 g), ,)/c __grd 6 7 f! --___ _--- ------ &Ztf_te-,-,__/--- F-3, %�I_ KID 7/1/PE- PrA5-"‘ 9/ :i"'1-1EZ. .-/R_.29Z.A AN____ _ .a.c.,e-s._-/_ _../2.661,_4<_2_________ /_4,5_3 4,> /J Lr 9,676. L5--R- il • 4. ;74 l ; f I ��' -7�y - 7, s6 .s 8 j e .7._,:f7 .- eel____R....___„5_.e./71..-tte4- ---. ‘ . .. yy 6. Flo Cam_ •E -._S.1 ?. - yeit-k--aeh-4- __ _ _3 0. .._./v ...__71-17_.,._._.Si- .- -- - 14t:6 3-9/ 7. o In v` I" CIC Q Y ` , P la 5 L k)_ala..atu a 0[20-5,L.... ,FJ.(tJ . Ili al Es.6.L.09110..e___Laar:C._ . ._.'_.. _I. U.i/Q___ tit 9.,g, 10.E li/1 si 9q650 6--R---s? alts-Zer— - Al 0 ausier- PETITION BY NEIGHBORS OF THE HIGHLAND'S COMMUNITY CHURCH OPPOSING REZONE OF BLOCK 32 To: The Hearing Examiner, City of Renton: The City Council , City of Renton : We neighbors of the Highland's Community Church oppose any change to Block 32 zoning. The • Church is located by conditional use permit at 3031 N.E. 1Oth Street (block 32) of Renton in an area zoned R-1 residential . Applicant seeks to rezone Block 32 from R-1 to a P-1 . As affected neighbors, we seek relief from applicant's proposal to rezone Block 32 and to expand (11900 square feet) the dominant structure in the neighborhood. RENTON CODE (SECTIONS/PARAGRAPHS) THAT FORM THE BASIS FOR RELIEF SOUGHT 4-31-5:A: Purpose: The Residential Zone (R-1) is established for low density single family dwellings. It is further intended to prohibit the development of incompatible uses that are detrimental to the residential environment. 4-3-2:C: The plan is, of necessity, general in its proposals. It must be flexible, since it is impossible to predict all future events which may affect the community. The plan is not a development ordinance, although it makes significant recommendations for future land use. The plan is not precise. It does not present engineering accuracy, nor does it claim to predict exactly the future of every parcel of property, or insure that growth is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. It is not intended to retroactively impose compliance with goals , objectives, and policies upon existing developed property, but voluntary compliance is encouraged. PRECEDENT FOR SELECTIVE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN IMPLEMENTATION Applicant's rezone application is selective in compliance with the Comprehensive Plan. Documentation is available indicating that the City Staff supports this interpretation. Reference City of Renton memo dated March 14,1990. OBJECTIONS BY AGGRIEVED NEIGHBORS We live in close proximity to applicant's church. Consequently, we experience first hand the adverse effects of applicant's enterprise-level-church-activities upon the enjoyment, comfort, and convenience of our property. More expansion would only bring more attrition of our property rights. We object to a rezone from R-1 to P-1 because rezone would allow the Church's escape from residential zone regulation (4-31-5:A) . We need that protection. And further, when compared to R-1 , P-1 zoning includes relaxed developmental standards for building height and lot coverage. Since applicant has already announced plans for a new 1500 seat sanctuary ( location of choice, Block 32) , a rezone to P-1 would develop the threat that the new sanctuary would be sited on Block 32. Truly, a location that would be a detriment to the adjacent residents due to size and closeness. Applicant justifies the rezone on the basis' of Comprehensive Plan compliance. With City Staff concurrence (reference City of Renton Memo dated March 14,1990) , the westerly portion of Church land is excluded from the rezone application. We neighbors contend that applicants compliance is made on a selective basis. To be consistent, we neighbors demand the same exclusionary rights. from Comprehensive Plan compliance. However, we seek an opposite position. A position leaving Block 32 zoning as it is. Clearly, a position that is allowed by 4-3-2:C: . As adjacent neighbors, we seek assurances that the residential character of our neighborhood will be preserved. We seek to coexist with a residential scale Highland' s Community Church while injoying the comfort and convenience of our residential property. RELIEF SOUGHT We request that the Hearing Examiner recommend against granting the rezone. We ask that the City Council concur and finalize the denial for rezone. A denial would preserve the residential character of our neighborhood. Such action would allow the adjacent neighbors to coexist with the Church without further attrition of their property rights. PRINTED NAME I SIGNATURE I ADDRESS I ZIP CODE I DATE 1. %elieJ4e l s.,_ beeLQ.2 ,5 eivE _�.�.z ��a��. s / • 4.n)_0 rma_dvv) ,VNCT7 ---_-_ g 5 /// Y, l,19- ) 1//!J a-6 __-9 l/vr.7cc74G&L) yre � �� emu /�F-a`� �/ / /1�- %�v6 4 __.__..__c �-_ .may . tee_._..__ ._ 7 6. w k ��Tz !Z:11:46? 16,0l. / /7c/ge. S/v 7. 11--7 71-74 .1-e .74-•/(--6 (14).‹- Q A-114 K.64.41 kt, .005 lk:0( ' --cr a-C.,\\Eic._._..7_1(kr_cci.T.0. akk v.laGot. d_ -{ s`t( _ 06- 3ozq Z .__ _. • . . .Ark/ AB',o..._.glieyL.__.Wc.._(6..`��.. PETITION BY NEIGHBORS OF THE HIGHLAND'S COMMUNITY CHURCH OPPOSING REZONE OF BLOCK 32 To: The Hearing Examiner, City of Renton: The City Council , City of Renton: We neighbors of the Highland's Community Church oppose any change to Block 32 zoning. The • Church is located by conditional use permit at 3031 N.E. 10th Street (block 32) of Renton in an area zoned R-1 residential . Applicant seeks to rezone Block 32 from R-1 to a P-1 . As affected neighbors, we seek relief from applicant's proposal to rezone Block 32 and to expand (11900 square feet) the dominant structure in the neighborhood. RENTON CODE (SECTIONS/PARAGRAPHS) THAT FORM THE BASIS. FOR RELIEF SOUGHT 4-31-5:A: Purpose: The Residential Zone (R-1) is established for low density single family dwellings. It is further intended to prohibit the development of incompatible uses that are detrimental to the residential environment. 4-3-2:C: The plan is, of necessity, general in its proposals. It must be flexible, since it is impossible to predict all future events which may affect the community. The plan is not a development ordinance, although it makes significant recommendations for future land use. The plan is not precise. It does not present engineering accuracy, nor does it claim to predict exactly the future of every parcel of property, or insure that growth is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. It is not intended to retroactively impose compliance with goals , objectives, and policies upon existing developed property, but voluntary compliance is encouraged. PRECEDENT FOR SELECTIVE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN IMPLEMENTATION Applicant's rezone application is selective in compliance with the Comprehensive Plan. Documentation is available ilndicating that the City Staff supports this interpretation. Reference City of Rentori memo dated March 14,1990. OBJECTIONS BY AGGRIEVED NEIGHBORS We live in close proximity to applicant's church . Consequently, we experience first hand the adverse effects of applicant's enterprise-level-church-activities upon the enjoyment, comfort, and convenience of our property. More expansion would only bring more attrition of our property rights. • We object to a rezone from R-1 to P-1 because rezone would allow the Church' s escape from residential zone regulation (4-31-5:A) . We need that protection. And further , when compared to R-1 , P-1 zoning includes relaxed developmental standards for building height and lot coverage.. Since applicant has already announced plans for a new 1500 seat sanctuary (location of choice, Block 32) , a rezone to P-1 would develop the threat that the new sanctuary would be sited on Block 32. Truly, a location that would be a detriment to the adjacent residents due to size and closeness. Applicant justifies the rezone on the basis of Comprehensive Plan compliance. With City Staff concurrence (reference City of Renton Memo dated March 14, 1990) , the westerly portion of Church land is excluded from the rezone application. We neighbors contend that applicants compliance is made on a selective basis. To be consistent, we neighbors demand the same exclusionary rights from Comprehensive Plan compliance. However, we seek an opposite position. A position leaving Block 32 zoning as it is. Clearly, a position that is allowed by 4-3-2:C: . As adjacent neighbors, we seek assurances that the residential character of our neighborhood will be preserved. We seek to coexist with a residential scale Highland's Community Church while enjoying the comfort and convenience of our residential property. RELIEF SOUGHT We request that the Hearing Examiner recommend against granting the rezone . We ask that the City Council concur and finalize the denial for rezone. A denial would preserve the residential character of our neighborhood. Such action would allow the adjacent neighbors to coexist with the Church without further attrition of their property rights. PRINTED NAME I SIGNATURE I ADDRESS I ZIP CODE I DATE 1. R0/9-1 jil. 15041 . 5°_./(44:144./D 41/-1-= • 2. \SA err;I/ cT. o.T _:b G%�2 _X! gLcI4 'd-Pf rliverly d ���s� S= 7 9/ &r7T1( sm 1_ .tr 1 r �. _. .6 o3 fie -7 _----- ./res6 ,S_ 4. '(i G� __- ----- ---____...___- // v 7. /6-/-61,3-4/,e ,(11 2"-76- Q. eA RL..W4 8ER.A'GR,--- _ L (V, g l3 Te eVD1-1 4116( NE Ms-6 5 aa1 I 9. V i/ ()) I a--pv, /V• I_ w[.5_..._ Lsr- E'e-z—o!!Y_h-._.!/../. _c/a_":�_'✓_ .._.._ = / or, ��Gf r 5 oil , //C PI, l_ / O 5 6 • /Z/a PETITION BY NEIGHBORS OF THE HIGHLAND'S COMMUNITY CHURCH OPPOSING REZONE OF BLOCK 32 To: The Hearing Examiner, City of Renton: The City Council, City of Renton: We neighbors of the Highland's Community Church oppose any change to Block 32 zoning. The Church is located by conditional use permit at 3031 N.E. 1Oth Street (block 32) of Renton in an area zoned R-1 residential . Applicant seeks to rezone Block 32 from R-1 to a P-1 . As affected neighbors, we seek relief from applicant's proposal to rezone Block 32 and to expand (11900 square feet) the dominant structure in the neighborhood. RENTON CODE (SECTIONS/PARAGRAPHS) THAT FORM THE BASIS FOR RELIEF SOUGHT 4-31-5:A: Purpose: The Residential Zone (R-1) is established for low density single family dwellings. It is further intended to prohibit the development of incompatible uses that are detrimental to the residential environment. 4-3-2:C: The plan is, of necessity, general in its proposals. It must be flexible, since it is impossible to predict all future events which may affect the community. The plan is not a development ordinance, although it makes significant recommendations for future land use. The plan is not precise. It does not present engineering accuracy, nor does it claim to predict exactly the future of every parcel of property, or insure that growth is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. It is not intended to retroactively impose compliance with goals , objectives, and policies upon existing developed property, but voluntary compliance is encouraged. PRECEDENT FOR SELECTIVE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN IMPLEMENTATION Applicant's rezone application is selective in compliance with the Comprehensive Plan. Documentation is available indicating that the City Staff supports this interpretation. Reference City of Renton memo dated March 14,1990. OBJECTIONS BY AGGRIEVED NEIGHBORS We live in close proximity to applicant's church . Consequently, we experience first hand the adverse effects of applicant's enterprise-level-church-activities upon the enjoyment, comfort, and convenience of our property. More expansion would only bring more attrition of our property rights. We object to a rezone from R-1 to P-1 because rezone would allow the Church's escape from residential zone regulation (4-31-5:A) . We need that protection. And further , when compared to R-1 , 'a1 zoning includes relaxed developmental standards for building height and lot coverage. Since pplicant has already announced plans for a new 1500 seat sanctuary (location of choice, Block 32) , rezone to P-1 would develop the threat that the new sanctuary would be sited on Block 32. Truly, a location that would be a detriment to the adjacent residents due to size and closeness. Applicant justifies the rezone on the basis of Comprehensive Plan compliance. With City Staff concurrence (reference City of Renton Memo dated March 14, 1990) , the westerly portion of Church land is excluded from the rezone application. We neighbors contend that applicants compliance is made on a selective basis. To be consistent, we neighbors demand the same exclusionary rights from Comprehensive Plan compliance. However, we seek an opposite position. A position leaving Block 32 zoning as it is. Clearly, a position that is allowed by 4-3-2:C: . As adjacent neighbors, we seek assurances that the residential character of our neighborhood will be preserved. We seek to coexist with a residential scale Highland's Community Church while enjoying the comfort and convenience of our residential property. RELIEF SOUGHT We request that the Hearing Examiner recommend against granting the rezone. We ask that the City Council concur and finalize the denial for rezone. A denial would preserve the residential character of our neighborhood. Such action would allow the adjacent neighbors to coexist with the Church without further attrition of their property rights. PRINTED NAME I SIGNATURE I ADDRESS I ZIP CODE I DATE ! a ri m1I7 O (/LcQ� L • ?lam ' ?Sas- -380 f 4. i- Ail k D, rgi ,/«ra. _ea ./2/2a go j 12.E n eve_ /VE fVOSlo 5-8-9/ The f j e. - s f� .. -F(.00 �_._ ,q(D - !'✓Id a : e_ eve -- . f -5 I E. ) DOF\i\t_ _ p( b slit] gi t31.{ARID WNE I'8'o 6g g- 0-9/ s _,Oz;--oz/te._ g`fhiti Nia./ NAAL2E-./v. e8.6o-6 ci-1- 0 / 8.tit 300cl NE cn'-u 9._41Arld,4.- C.Pefcro,o 11,1,„,LLA C/P1 ,, 3009 1 )€ c/5056, 5-2.1-41 e. i9ue x! --•-- _18vs6 _ � �% 2-if PETITION BY NEIGHBORS OF THE HIGHLAND'S COMMUNITY CHURCH OPPOSING REZONE OF BLOCK 32 To: The Hearing Examiner, City of Renton: The City Council, City of Renton: We neighbors of the Highland's Community Church oppose any change to Block 32 zoning. The Church is located by conditional use permit at 3031 N.E. 1Oth Street (block 32) of Renton in an area zoned R-1 residential . Applicant seeks to rezone Block 32 from R-1 to a P-1 . As affected neighbors, we seek relief from applicant's proposal to rezone Block 32 and to expand (11900 square feet) the ominant structure in the neighborhood. 12, rENTON CODE (SECTIONS/PARAGRAPHS) THAT FORM THE BASIS FOR RELIEF SOUGHT 4-31-5:A: Purpose: The Residential Zone (R-1) is established for low density single family dwellings. It is further intended to prohibit the development of incompatible uses that are detrimental to the residential environment. 4-3-2:C: The plan is, of necessity, general in its proposals. It must be flexible, since it is impossible to predict all future events which may affect the community. The plan is not a development ordinance, although it makes significant recommendations for future land use. The plan is not precise. It does not present engineering accuracy, nor does it claim to predict exactly the future of every parcel of property, or insure that growth is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. It is not intended to retroactively impose compliance with goals , objectives, and policies upon existing developed property, but voluntary compliance is encouraged. PRECEDENT FOR SELECTIVE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN IMPLEMENTATION Applicant's rezone application is selective in compliance with the Comprehensive Plan. Documentation is available indicating that the City Staff supports this interpretation. Reference City of Renton memo dated March 14,1990. OBJECTIONS BY AGGRIEVED NEIGHBORS We live in close proximity to applicant's church. Consequently, we experience first hand the adverse effects of applicant' s enterprise-level-church-activities upon the enjoyment, comfort, and convenience of our property. More expansion would only bring more attrition of our property rights. We object to a rezone from R-1 to P-1 because rezone would allow the Church's escape from residential zone regulation (4-31-5:A) . We need that protection. And further, when compared to R-1 , P-1 zoning includes relaxed developmental standards for building height and lot coverage. Since applicant has already announced plans for a new 1500 seat sanctuary (location of choice, Block 32) , a rezone to P-1 would develop the threat that the new sanctuary would be sited on Block 32. Truly, a location that would be a detriment to the adjacent residents due to size and closeness. Applicant justifies the rezone on the basis of Comprehensive Plan compliance. With City Staff concurrence (reference City of Renton Memo dated March 14, 1990) , the westerly portion of Church land is excluded from the rezone application. We neighbors contend that applicants compliance is made on a selective basis.. To be consistent, we neighbors demand the same exclusionary rights from Comprehensive Plan compliance. However, we seek an opposite position. A position leaving Block 32 zoning as it is. Clearly, a position that is allowed by 4-3-2:C: . As adjacent neighbors, we seek assurances that the residential character of our neighborhood will be preserved. We seek to coexist with a residential scale Highland' s Community Church while enjoying the comfort and convenience of our residential property. RELIEF SOUGHT We request that the Hearing Examiner recommend against granting the rezone . We ask that the City Council concur and finalize the denial for rezone. A denial would preserve the residential character of our neighborhood. Such action would allow the adjacent neighbors to coexist with the Church without further attrition of their property rights. PRINTED NAME -- I SIGNATURE I ADDRESS I ZIP CODE I DATE 1. o/J_ /1E/ZSo'1-9 ------ �J --ci.-1 G • ..., g/1 1irJp _Az_C--- --- 9I s, ..S-l'e_ 1 .r oe o.0 /Uzi z/5 A✓ 4 -. ia7c-z c6- ._,u, e- -- fl0L . s - -.- .7 ✓� G l 1 /10 3. h-1 oA4Pr _..J_ Cw c A-o LA_ �.J 0 it �CL� N, .fi U JL4 q(fo5 __ 5/6_9i 4. 141-gv e% L_._S�n/01)/�/L -- -__--•-,t�-�1 ---_ "•-3 C�-J�ik.„k, S7 lie./V, /_, 9 m�S�j S`--Ye'l/ �2f 5._.4c c .!il/e:.-5!frf s _..__.._ :27.4.,- -E && .d. ....___ 20 frn. `y 12d.I6 6;/„p:. qi 1_,A-i-r y Po i I ey Xe--7-,d'"(-7-- ,O,5-0 i/oW,4-40i A0e, /0 r 7po 5 6 __5.-c1V-qi 6. 7. r6 reRI4 c _zi.. .. ...4f.s. .c...._ GG- 1._.. . .. ... .. _„. __ _5?..a.o .x.).2.E....(..021....._....______ aea--c. 7---i7 _ - --7-__...1.f:,)/ . B.�lf_.h_ -�.�. --1-r./ /. ._ii_ __ . _.-_..i� 1v�......._ . .// _ _ b �%t ,-e. /�G.� iCicil _. 0_:',101/ r 9- ‘-) '2IYAr-24-5:- Di J kill E --ea4, 611O1(9i, ,,a) fia6-- 5-: 1,21. __ \(\ -- _ _L__ _ Day .... , , 5fryti 2-/a PETITION BY NEIGHBORS OF THE HIGHLAND'S COMMUNITY CHURCH OPPOSING REZONE OF BLOCK 32 To: The Hearing Examiner, City of Renton: The City Council, City of Renton: We neighbors of the Highland's Community Church oppose any change to Block 32 zoning. The Church is located by conditional use permit at 3031 N.E. 1Oth Street (block 32) of Renton in an area zoned R-1 residential . Applicant seeks to rezone Block 32 from R-1 to a P-1 . As affected neighbors, we seek relief from applicant's proposal to rezone Block 32 and to expand (11900 square feet) the dominant structure in the neighborhood. RENTON CODE (SECTIONS/PARAGRAPHS) THAT FORM THE BASIS FOR RELIEF SOUGHT 4-31-5:A: Purpose: The Residential Zone (R-1) is established for low density single family dwellings. It is further intended to prohibit the development of incompatible uses that are detrimental to the residential environment. 4-3-2:C: The plan is, of necessity, general in its proposals. It must be flexible, since it is impossible to predict alll future events which may affect the community. The plan is not a development ordinance, although it makes significant recommendations for future land use. The plan is not precise. It does not present engineering accuracy, nor does it claim to predict exactly the future of every parcel of property, or insure that growth is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. It is not intended to retroactively impose compliance with goals , objectives, and policies upon existing developed property, but voluntary compliance is encouraged. PRECEDENT FOR SELECTIVE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN IMPLEMENTATION Applicant's rezone application is selective in compliance with the Comprehensive Plan. Documentation is available indicating that the City Staff supports this interpretation. Reference City of Renton memo dated March 14,1990. OBJECTIONS BY AGGRIEVED NEIGHBORS We live in close proximity to applicant's church . Consequently, we experience first hand the adverse effects of applicant' s enterprise-level-church-activities upon the enjoyment, comfort, and convenience of our property. More expansion would only bring more attrition of our property rights. We obiect to a rezone from R-1 to P-1 because rezone would allow the Church's escape from residential zone regulation (4-31-5:A) . We need that protection . And further , when compared to R-1 , P-1 zoning includes relaxed developmental standards for building height and lot coverage. Since applicant has already announced plans for a new 1500 seat sanctuary (location of choice, Block 32) , a rezone to P-1 would develop the threat that the new sanctuary would be sited on Block 32. Truly, a location that would be a detriment to the adjacent residents due to size and closeness. Applicant justifies the rezone on the basis of Comprehensive Plan compliance. With City Staff concurrence (reference City of Renton Memo dated March 14,1990) , the westerly portion of Church land is excluded from the rezone application. We neighbors contend that applicants compliance is made on a selective basis. To be consistent, we neighbors demand the same exclusionary rights from Comprehensive Plan compliance. However, we seek an opposite position. A position leaving Block 32 zoning as it is. Clearly, a position that is allowed by 4-3-2:C: . As adjacent neighbors, we seek assurances that the residential character of our neighborhood will be preserved. We seek to coexist with a residential scale Highland's Community Church while enjoying the comfort and convenience of our residential property. RELIEF SOUGHT We request that the Hearing Examiner recommend against granting the rezone. We ask that the City Council concur and finalize the denial for rezone. A denial would preserve the residential character of our neighborhood. Such action would allow the adjacent neighbors to coexist with the Church without further attrition of their property rights. PRINTED NAME I SIGNATURE I ADDRESS I ZIP CODE I DATE 1 2.0,..... 1, --- _--- --- ---- qa S=. ►1tdZCLO_d__Aue, IJ,E _°/ga S 6_ 5/9 /9 / 2. ..b k.4 a.,3.z,_5 -,Y)---.4.A.,6 'dc,2, -/-- . 2s37.eir,j,,,,„,-,L. CIA,L9, 2 ),P0-5-t, S----g-9) e , 4.l_ x. ' .._ O'dh4 e _ �ti_ - __ =�- ._- -__ 8'�G ._.. N E. 9 o. b s ly 5 A I T,�1 C E. jAin / 1./t/V‘.- / 1 9,0 c 4411'iA-6W 41/1..--- iti" 5.70.5g -1j20 l - -- y ° , �1`�� ,1 (��s� cam.. °`� �Q. � �e2,,, ,;,)A_ �'s Z L 1M eli�v _ /49 (iu) 0 S �i 7,J,„,e,„Joh,J„N ,,j,ip,„„--, (4,.,--„,.,___ ..._,_ _ , �, p 61)0790x4E, A.- qgoT-6, Vidgi c0 . . __,.____ „ kip (.... 84_4 %'' ,A./ /--(--(--'(‘--4---2 2--' , 2 hvph- Cialt,9- q.4 - 40&IA 1 a(CI\&-• 9eV4 a 421q/ 9•/ __,7 - jr------4Z.t,,A44„,„74)0141//I Al it ir:Kt it /141 4.4...-i v144.1 Drlir--. i tO0 --7: _0....--._ ! 7_17 i )CAI PETITION BY NEIGHBORS OF THE HIGHLAND'S COMMUNITY CHURCH OPPOSING REZONE OF BLOCK 32 To: The Hearing Examiner, City of Renton: The City Council , City of Renton : We neighbors of the Highland's Community Church oppose any change to Block 32 zoning. The Church is located by conditional use permit at 3031 N.E. 1Oth Street (block 32) of Renton in an area zoned R-1 residential. Applicant seeks to rezone Block 32 from R-1 to a P-1 . As affected neighbors, . we seek relief from applicant's proposal to rezone Block 32 and to expand (11900 square feet) the dominant structure in the neighborhood.. RENTON CODE (SECTIONS/PARAGRAPHS) THAT FORM THE BASIS FOR RELIEF SOUGHT 4-31-5:A: Purpose: The Residential Zone (R-1) is established for low density single family dwellings. It is further intended to prohibit the development of incompatible uses that are detrimental to the residential environment. 4-3-2:C: The plan is, of necessity, general in its proposals. It must be flexible, since it is impossible to predict all future events which may affect the community. The plan is not a development ordinance, although it makes significant recommendations for future land use. The plan is not precise. It does not present engineering accuracy, nor does it claim to predict exactly the future of every parcel of property, or insure that growth is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. It is not intended to retroactively impose compliance with goals , objectives, and policies upon existing developed property, but voluntary compliance is encouraged. PRECEDENT FOR SELECTIVE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN IMPLEMENTATION Applicant's rezone application is selective in compliance with the Comprehensive Plan. Documentation is available indicating that the City Staff supports this interpretation. Reference City of Renton memo dated March 14,1990. OBJECTIONS BY AGGRIEVED NEIGHBORS We live in close proximity to applicant's church . Consequently, we experience first hand the adverse effects of applicant's enterprise-level-church-activities upon the enjoyment, comfort, and convenience of our property. More expansion would only bring more attrition of our property rights. We object to a rezone from R-1 to P-1 because rezone would allow the Church's escape from residential zone regulation (4-31-5:A) . We need that protection. And further , when compared to R-1 , P-1 zoning includes relaxed developmental standards for building height and lot coverage. Since applicant has already announced plans for a new 1500 seat sanctuary ( location of choice, Block 32) , a rezone to P-1 would develop the threat that the new sanctuary would be sited on Block 32. Truly, a location that would be a detriment to the adjacent residents due to size and closeness. Applicant justifies the rezone on the basis of Comprehensive Plan compliance. With City Staff concurrence (reference City of Renton Memo _dated March 14, 1990) . the westerly portion of Church land is excluded from the rezone application. We neighbors contend that applicants compliance is made on a selective basis. To be consistent, we neighbors demand the same exclusionary rights from Comprehensive Plan compliance. However, we seek an opposite position. A position leaving Block 32 zoning as it is. Clearly, a position that is allowed by 4-3-2:C: . As adjacent neighbors, we seek assurances that the residential character of our neighborhood will be preserved. We seek to coexist with a residential scale Highland's Community Church while enjoying the comfort and convenience of our residential property. RELIEF SOUGHT We request that the Hearing Examiner recommend against granting the rezone . We ask that the City Council concur and finalize the denial for rezone. A denial would preserve the residential character of our neighborhood. Such action would allow the adjacent neighbors to coexist with the Church without further attrition of their property rights. PRINTED NAME I - SIGNATURE I ADDRESS I ZIP CODE I DATE . w Liciot kit. AL 3 0 aA s `1 oZ -i,� 4. A CI zw-g-, r /1Z:4-) /J (-• 5. - r . 73/02.4/A-i),%s7 / 9/0‘,5-6 6- o� m �i9 e- l -1`-' T --‘ri-kkeTh 4/4 31-ItC4f 104 ie--(4A ,01. 4i-51,25) ,/ !Vale? _ __ - �.. -.._-�__._..._..._•. � ice'--•_-_ 3I/ _._.._.-..-•4= • je14/LicedSZ .<7-://- _- �1 1"'l-ilL J J AI;-VJC7LE`(i Yl)�/ A/E • L .)7-c)/4 % !6 Pa S -1j-)' X R.2- PETITION BY NEIGHBORS OF THE HIGHLAND'S COMMUNITY CHURCH OPPOSING REZONE OF BLOCK 32 To: The Hearing Examiner, City of Renton: The City Council, City of Renton: We neighbors of the Highland's Community Church oppose any change to Block 32 zoning. The • Church is located by conditional use permit at 3031 N.E. 1Oth Street (block 32) of Renton in an area zoned R-1 residential . Applicant seeks to rezone Block 32 from R-1 to a P-1 . As affected neighbors, we seek relief from applicant's proposal to rezone Block 32 and to expand (11900 square feet) the dominant structure in the neighborhood. RENTON CODE (SECTIONS/PARAGRAPHS) THAT FORM THE BASIS FOR RELIEF SOUGHT 4-31-5:A: Purpose: The Residential Zone (R-1) is established for low density single family dwellings. It is further intended to prohibit the development of incompatible uses that are detrimental to the residential environment. 4-3-2:C: The plan is, of necessity, general in its, proposals. It must be flexible, since it is impossible to predict all future events which may affect the community. The plan is not a development ordinance, although it makes significant recommendations for future land use. The plan is not precise. It does not present engineering accuracy, nor does it claim to predict exactly the future of every parcel of property, or insure that growth is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. It is not intended to retroactively impose compliance with goals , objectives, and policies upon esisting developed property, but voluntary compliance is encouraged. PRECEDENT FOR SELECTIVE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN IMPLEMENTATION Applicant's rezone application is selective in compliance with the Comprehensive Plan. Documentation is available indicating that the City Staff supports this interpretation. Reference City of Renton memo dated March 14,1990. OBJECTIONS BY AGGRIEVED NEIGHBORS We live in close proximity to applicant's church . Consequently, we experience first hand the adverse effects of applicant's enterprise-level-church-activities upon the enjoyment, comfort, and convenience of our property. More expansion would only bring more attrition of our property rights. We object to a rezone from R-1 to P-1 because rezone would allow the Church's escape from residential zone regulation (4-31-5:A) . We need that protection. And further, when compared to R-1, P-1 zoning includes relaxed developmental standards for building height and lot coverage. Since applicant has already announced plans for a new 1500 seat sanctuary (location of choice, Block 32) , a rezone to P-1 would develop the threat that the new sanctuary would be sited on Block 32. Truly, a location that would be a detriment to the adjacent residents due to size and closeness. Applicant justifies the rezone on the basis of Comprehensive Plan compliance. With City Staff concurrence (reference City of Renton Memo dated March 14, 1990) . the westerly portion of Church land is excluded from the rezone application. We neighbors contend that applicants compliance is made on a selective basis. To be consistent, we neighbors demand the same exclusionary rights from Comprehensive Plan compliance. However, we seek an opposite position . A position leaving Block 32 zoning as it is. Clearly, a position that is allowed by 4-3-2:C: . As adjacent neighbors, we seek assurances that the residential character of our neighborhood will be preserved. We seek to coexist with a residential scale Highland's Community Church while enjoying the comfort and convenience of our residential property. RELIEF SOUGHT We request that the Hearing Examiner recommend against granting the rezone. We ask that the City Council concur and finalize the denial for rezone. A denial would preserve the residential character of our neighborhood. Such action would allow the adjacent neighbors to coexist with the Church without further attrition of their property rights. PRINTED NAME I SIGNATURE I ADDRESS I ZIP CODE I DATE 1, _E/ Q'_./. 4__-4C.1/d-sL --. E2 _ i-.e.e. r .6 ,17: b 9f 2._Rie1 ..._/_ 42.�_,4( __,e ‘f..) _ -b-r��7. ,•e _. d. �..._._ .vage. _ v=z=i a )c- 3. 4-divih B._ G/74.stie__._ /2„,$)A1..._ ' 4. E. 7. 6. 1ID. 4 Z.3 PETITION BY NEIGHBORS OF THE HIGHLAND'S COMMUNITY CHURCH OPPOSING REZONE OF BLOCK 32 To: The Hearing Examiner, City of Renton: The City Council , City of Renton: We neighbors of the Highland's Community Church oppose any change to Block 32 zoning. The Church is located by conditional use permit at 3031 N.E. 1Oth Street (block 32) of Renton in an area zoned R-1 residential . Applicant seeks to rezone Block 32 from R-1 to a P-1 . As affected neighbors, we seek relief from applicant's proposal to rezone Block 32 and to expand (11900 square feet) the dominant structure in the neighborhood. RENTON CODE (SECTIONS/PARAGRAPHS) THAT FORM THE BASIS FOR RELIEF SOUGHT 4-31-5:A: Purpose: The Residential Zone (R-1) is established for low density single family dwellings. It is further intended to prohibit the development of incompatible uses that are detrimental to the residential environment. 1 4-3-2:C: The plan is, of necessity, general in its proposals. It must be flexible, since it is impossible to predict all future events which may affect the community. The plan is not a development ordinance, although it makes significant recommendations for future land use. The plan is not precise. It does not present engineering accuracy, nor does it claim to predict exactly the future of every parcel of property, or insure that growth is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. It is not intended to retroactively impose compliance with goals , objectives, and policies upon existing developed property, but voluntary compliance is encouraged. PRECEDENT FOR SELECTIVE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN IMPLEMENTATION Applicant's rezone application is selective in compliance with the Comprehensive Plan. Documentation is available indicating that the City Staff supports this interpretation. Reference City of Renton memo dated March 14,1990. OBJECTIONS BY AGGRIEVED NEIGHBORS a We live in close proximity to applicant's church. Consequently, we experience first hand the adverse effects of applicant's enterprise-level-church-activities upon the enjoyment, comfort, and convenience of our property. More expansion would only bring more attrition of our property rights. We object to a rezone from R-1 to P-1 because rezone would allow the Church's escape from residential zone regulation (4-31-5:A) . We need that protection. And further, when compared to R-1 , P-i zoning includes relaxed developmental standards for building height and lot coverage. Since applicant has already announced plans for a new 1500 seat sanctuary (location of choice, Block 32) , a rezone to P-1 would develop the threat that the new sanctuary would be sited on Block 32. Truly, a location that would be a detriment to the adjacent residents due to size and closeness. Applicant justifies the rezone on the basis of Comprehensive Plan compliance. With City Staff concurrence (reference City of Renton Memo dated March 14,1990) , the westerly portion of Church land is excluded from the rezone application. We neighbors contend that applicants compliance is made on a selective basis. To be consistent, we neighbors demand the same exclusionary rights from Comprehensive Plan compliance. However, we seek an opposite position. A position leaving Block 32 zoning as it is. Clearly, a position that is allowed by 4-3-2:C: . As adjacent neighbors, we seek assurances that the residential character of our neighborhood will be preserved. We seek to coexist with a residential scale Highland's Community Church while enjoying the comfort and convenience of our residential property. RELIEF SOUGHT We request that the Hearing Examiner recommend against granting the rezone. We ask that the City Council concur and finalize the denial for rezone. A denial would preserve the residential character of our neighborhood. Such action would allow the adjacent neighbors to coexist with the Church without further attrition of their property rights. PRINTED NAME I SIGNATURE I ADDRESS I ZIP CODE I DATE 1.0 A i.o s T C���wzs ik re. Ay 4 , ,lr 're l/b 9e 4_i171 r - - - . ',._ _ ._ ... �. . ._ - _--..: 9.uv_kI'CEIr..z. a rev. .E.._hP �.iA as 6 5,sh, 3. .I�1.... LW _(..... ........ o K gat_ k, , a„,,,k) 2,,.„-t:,98m s zs q, 4-___64:01: Jr____,/12_!te ____,C1 ___ _ ---- 5;-c----- iii-45;? y �{ ,f'/a S/t r 10 ,d'm) --- prewitn \ 44- 4,,,--, -5'4068 /VC, /014(1./ 90-5-0 01 -q ( , ______ _OL.4_0--_____ . a.,.(. _ed o? /VE 104 L5' ... A76:4,k9P. 76 7. 6; .. lid yo,"..„.__ (717 / 4.1 ,Je )C L4• �j C. e.,7ti (4",� �//I 1 0. PETITION BY NEIGHBORS OF THE HIGHLAND'S COMMUNITY CHURCH OPPOSING REZONE OF BLOCK 32 To: The Hearing Examiner, City of Renton: The City Council, City of Renton: We neighbors of the Highland's Community' Church oppose any change to Block 32 zoning. The • Church is located by conditional use permit at 3031 N.E. 1Oth Street (block 32) of Renton in an area zoned R-1 residential . Applicant seeks to rezone Block 32 from R-1 to a P-1 . As affected neighbors, we seek relief from applicant's proposal to rezone Block 32 and to expand (11900 square feet) the dominant structure in the neighborhood. RENTON CODE (SECTIONS/PARAGRAPHS) THAT FORM THE BASIS FOR RELIEF SOUGHT 4-31-5:A: Purpose: The Residential Zone (R-1) is established for low density single family dwellings. It is further intended to prohibit the development of incompatible uses that are detrimental to the residential environment. 4-3-2:C: The plan is, of necessity, general in its proposals. It must be flexible, since it is impossible to predict all future events which may affect the community. The plan is not a development ordinance, although it makes significant recommendations for future land use. The plan is not precise. It does not present engineering accuracy, nor does it claim to predict exactly the future of every parcel of property, or insure that growth is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. It is not intended to retroactively impose compliance with goals , objectives, and policies upon existing developed property, but voluntary compliance is encouraged. PRECEDENT FOR SELECTIVE' COMPREHENSIVE PLAN IMPLEMENTATION Applicant's rezone application is selective in compliance with the Comprehensive Plan. Documentation is available indicating that the City Staff supports this interpretation. Reference City of Renton memo dated March 14,1990. OBJECTIONS BY AGGRIEVED NEIGHBORS We live in close proximity to applicant's church. Consequently, we experience first hand the adverse effects of applicant's enterprise-level-church-activities upon the enjoyment, comfort, and convenience of our property. More expansion would only bring more attrition of our property rights. We object to a rezone from R-1 to P-1 because rezone would allow the Church's escape from residential zone regulation (4-31-5:A) . We need that protection. And further , when compared to R-1 , P-1 zoning includes relaxed developmental standards for building height and lot coverage. Since applicant has already announced plans for a new 1500 seat sanctuary ( location of choice, Block 32) , a rezone to P-1 would develop the threat that the new sanctuary would be sited on Block 32. Truly, a location that would be a detriment to the adjacent residents due to size and closeness. Applicant justifies the rezone on the basis of Comprehensive Plan compliance. With City Staff concurrence (reference City of Renton Memo dated March 14,1990) , the westerly portion of Church land is excluded from the rezone application. We neighbors contend that applicants compliance is made on a selective basis. To be consistent, we neighbors demand the same exclusionary rights from Comprehensive Plan compliance. However, we seek an opposite position. A position leaving Block 32 zoning as it is. Clearly, a position that is allowed by 4-3-2:C: . As adjacent neighbors, we seek assurances that the residential character of our neighborhood will be preserved. We seek to coexist with a residential scale Highland's Community Church while enjoying the comfort and convenience of our residential property. RELIEF SOUGHT We request that the Hearing Examiner recommend against granting the rezone. We ask that the City Council concur and finalize the denial for rezone. A denial would preserve the residential character of our neighborhood. Such action would allow the adjacent neighbors to coexist with the Church without further attrition of their property rights. PRINTED NAME I SIGNATURE I ADDRESS I ZIP CODE I DATE >df 1 --'- 7-141 6°‘ ./24X/6_ fecok, ‘45,_/7/ s,/,s/ Jgok-s-L - . g F 1.0 a`A AJgmA1'r!/G;..-)42-�-G- (27 "`"`"'-'a .� t. -1�--_-` _ gl - L 4. • 6. 7. 8. 9. 121. 2S PETITION BY NEIGHBORS OF THE HIGHLAND'S COMMUNITY CHURCH OPPOSING REZONE OF BLOCK 32 To: The Hearing Examiner, City of Renton: The City Council, City of Renton: We neighbors of the Highland's Community Church oppose any change to Block _32 zoning. The Church is located by conditional use permit at 3031 N.E. 1Oth Street (block. 32) of Renton in an area zoned R-1 residential . Applicant seeks to rezone Block 32 from R-1 to a P-1 . As affected neighbors, we seek relief from applicant's proposal to rezone Block 32 and to expand (11900 square feet) the dominant structure in the neighborhood. • RENTON CODE (SECTIONS/PARAGRAPHS) THAT FORM THE BASIS FOR RELIEF SOUGHT 4-31-5:A: Purpose: The Residential Zone (R-1) is established for low density single family dwellings. It is further intended to prohibit the development of incompatible uses that are detrimental to the residential environment. 4-3-2:C: The plan is, of necessity, general in its proposals. It must be flexible, since it is impossible to predict all future events which may affect the community. The plan is not a development ordinance, although it makes significant recommendations for future land use. The plan is not precise. It does not present engineering accuracy, nor does it - claim to predict exactly the future of every parcel of property, or insure that growth is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. It is not intended to retroactively impose compliance with goals , objectives, and policies upon existing developed property, but voluntary compliance is encouraged. PRECEDENT FOR SELECTIVE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN IMPLEMENTATION Applicant's rezone application is selective in compliance with the Comprehensive Plan. Documentation is available indicating that the City Staff supports this interpretation. Reference City of Renton memo dated March 14,1990. OBJECTIONS BY AGGRIEVED NEIGHBORS We live in close proximity to applicant's church . Consequently, we experience first hand the adverse effects of applicant's enterprise-level-church-activities upon the enjoyment, comfort, and convenience of our property. More expansion would only bring more attrition of our property rights. We object to a rezone from R-1 to P-1 because rezone would allow the Church's escape from residential zone regulation (4-31-5:A) . We need that protection. And further , when compared to R-1 , P-1 zoning includes relaxed developmental standards for building height and lot coverage. Since applicant has already announced plans for a new 1500 seat sanctuary (location of choice, Block 32) , a rezone to P-1 would develop the threat that the new sanctuary would be sited on Block 32. Truly, a location that would be a detriment to the adjacent residents due to size and closeness. Applicant justifies the rezone on the basis of Comprehensive Plan compliance. With City Staff concurrence (reference City of Renton Memo dated March 14, 1990) , the westerly portion of Church land is excluded from the rezone application. We neighbors contend that applicants compliance is made on a selective basis. To be consistent, we neighbors demand the same exclusionary rights from Comprehensive Plan compliance. However, we seek an opposite position . A position leaving Block 32 zoning as it is. Clearly, a position that 'is allowed by 4-3-2:C: . As adjacent neighbors, we seek assurances that the residential character of our neighborhood I will be preserved. We seek to coexist with a residential scale Highland' s Community Church while enjoying the comfort and convenience of our residential property. RELIEF SOUGHT We request that the Hearing Examiner recommend against granting the rezone . We ask that the City Council concur and finalize the denial for rezone. A denial would preserve the residential character of our neighborhood. Such action would allow the adjacent neighbors to coexist with the Church without further attrition of their property rights. PRINTED NAME I SIGNATURE I ADDRESS I ZIP CODE I DATE • . )42 \- 1.:agji4 A 1 R _ .PAICEI 4, At-c,e,4 ,k- l'e"2" 75-,5:M Ai. A X.A-1(gi A VC _NE MS.:5-- 6-1-?/ . 9 / 2. .1?___FLy_r .10---____ _ __ LL sit` KiktgA- ,. kUi__ : cwiss -2)V • 44-41 ya �j 1 J 0 R. .&�� . f -sl _. ?Q --- -./_ 1 _4_ .2_ _ 91.E- __ -,gJ r/ • 4.L����1._eG _. y_A k W7tV.A6k _ go'7 /7 I r /oL 7 1---- - o.5''� 04Y 5. __AV-1....LAISIO____________. _..I. i-.1/--11._ Z -zet ._ 3'6,1 3-&-Cc-FisaA Am_AJE 9,',56 (5.1* -, 6. _ _ A___OCILICLEL,____ _ ft\CIA ...,\R / -21.- __.\. .1.r .bi.n.d_.141/_Le_...at..T-___ q_a_C_GLO___ gOilliq/ 7.jq• A2/11/G L eT..7_3 C-II7----,-/----- 24/4.A 2r;VV.57;," ____Lv.. d?A/471 x 8. __FCI✓ /f. -13-N eS__ a/l _ L-o 830 .7-edFfe. 1-',so/4/ ✓17 y-go.5"‘_ 6(_��I`l 9. 10. PETITION BY NEIGHBORS OF THE HIGHLAND'S COMMUNITY CHURCH OPPOSING REZONE OF BLOCK 32 To: The Hearing Examiner, City of Renton: The City Council, City of Renton : We neighbors of the Highland's Community Church oppose any change to Block 32 zoning. The • Church is located by conditional use permit at 3031 N.E. 1Oth Street (block 32) of Renton in an area zoned R-1 residential . Applicant seeks to rezone Block 32 from R-1 to a P-1 . As affected neighbors, we seek relief from applicant's proposal to rezone Block 32 and to expand (11900 square feet) the dominant structure , in the neighborhood. RENTON CODE (SECTIONS/PARAGRAPHS) THAT FORM THE BASIS FOR RELIEF SOUGHT 4-31-5:A: Purpose: The Residential Zone (R-1) is established for low density single family dwellings. It is further intended to prohibit the development of incompatible uses that are detrimental to the residential environment. 4-3-2:C: The plan is, of necessity, general in its proposals. It must be flexible, since it is impossible to predict all future events which may affect the community. The plan is not a development ordinance, although it makes significant recommendations for future land use, The plan is not precise. It does not present engineering accuracy, nor does it claim to predict exactly the future of every parcel of property, or insure that growth is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. It is not intended to retroactively impose compliance with goals , objectives, and policies upon existing developed property, but voluntary compliance is encouraged. PRECEDENT FOR SELECTIVE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN IMPLEMENTATION Applicant's rezone application is selective in compliance with the Comprehensive Plan. Documentation is available indicating that the City Staff supports this interpretation. Reference City of Renton memo dated Marigh 14,1990. OBJECTIONS BY AGGRIEVED NEIGHBORS We live in close proximity to applicant's church . Consequently, we experience first hand the adverse effects of applicant's enterprise-level-church-activities upon the enjoyment, comfort, and convenience of our property. More expansion would only bring more attrition of our property rights. We object to a rezone from R-1 to P-1 because rezone would allow the Church's escape from residential zone regulation (4-31-5:A) . We need that protection. And further, when compared to R-1 , P-1 zoning includes relaxed developmental standards for building height and lot coverage. Since applicant has already announced plans for a new 1500 seat sanctuary (location of choice, Block 32) , a rezone to P-1 would develop the threat that the new sanctuary would be sited on Block 32. Truly, a location that -would be a detriment to the adjacent residents due to size and closeness. Applicant justifies the rezone on the basis of Comprehensive Plan compliance. With City Staff concurrence (reference City of Renton Memo dated March 14, 1990) ,. the westerly portion of Church land is excluded from the rezone application. We neighbors contend that applicants compliance is made on a selective basis. To be consistent, we neighbors demand the same exclusionary rights from Comprehensive Plan compliance. However, we seek an opposite position . A position leaving Block 32 zoning as it is: Clearly, a position that is allowed by 4-3-2:C: . As adjacent neighbors, we seek assurances that the residential character of our neighborhood will be preserved. We seek to coexist with a residential scale Highland's Community Church while enjoying the comfort and convenience of our residential property. BELIEF SOUGHT We request that the Hearing Examiner recommend against granting the rezone. We ask that the City Council concur and finalize the denial for rezone. A denial would preserve the residential character of our neighborhood. Such action would allow the adjacent neighbors to coexist with the Church without. further attrition of their property rights. PRINTED NAME I SIGNATURE I ADDRESS I ZIP CODE I DATE 90 b • 6/0) s. mrpA/61, 61f/vp/u/kii,A :77/ OV, r yza 6/1A/ 4.&c6) Li4 K 1‘1_,26.2PF6 7,.?"' -Le,7f ,VC 19E)/ 9 s 4)._tly I 5.6/ei6i.-/-AiZ --"Wke4/ &Ail/ 84O Alpo( dr A/6". 665,4; _9;46 c:7,74 E _ /-1/ 7. +.Y 8. 9. • 1I . i+ • • r ' . 11 . .,,. , . , . 4 ' i . . . ,t•, . . . . , t . , . ,0 I.. i r •, . . • - I . / • ... . i . . . . I I I . • I I 1 • I II I / I I I I ,' I • ••• 1 t...' ! I I I I • I . . . . i . . I I I I . I I . I I I I i . . . I I I I . . I . I . I 1 1 . .r -• • • . . . . 4 . / • • • ./ ,. . .. . • . ?Z• - -.- , I, 0 t i I: 7.3 . AD • .„. • ,. . . ta . , • . . ,, .•, ,,, I .,',: . . , , .. - . . , ., . . . . a . n ; I I'b ' Ut a a Mg . • I ' ' o /b • . 'I . , . . ! i .. I 1 Qoo0 L D.Affith a pow„gz , . b . I i 1 , I , i I .. 1, I 1' I i . t ' 1 I . I • • I I • I I 1 • ... • i I I • , . . , 1. • . - . i 1 .... 4 . ...q:.,.... , 1 i . • . I 1 . . . I 1 . i ; I; . I iI I . . I . ; . I I . ; IL LusTie4-7-764J cep 1vcie. -4F,9 DISsi /et) 7--/&-7d 1 . . ,,.. k • 1 oF el E-4<_.15*) OkylvPic; ;/-(0.1)V7-4/ A).S . . ! [ '1`• / ., I '''."7-,..„ •. 11. I • ''''',....,...„. "--...).., . ---..,..... •....... ii ___,... .._ sr In= L A11111 - '1-i-, i•- i 11- .---._—'-'1 ,t4:71' Till. ..--•-.....rt, ,....,_,..,.. IL . hiliri_..:71----u ,r ------ 11 Fun 1 — 11 I -... , 0 11 I 1 I _----....- , ............ ,,,,,,-, , ,,_, •, , , ______----- . , „--.-, .4., ..,./i.,,___._ .„.... ,.,..... __. • Fr' "le44 A ' ; ,. _. . _ 1.... . .N / CI. \. !— :--1 -----4/.........• Jr 1 , 0 1 ' i 4 I . 1 cz.7011: •j-1.-41 le--1 7 1 t C ' I 2 N--..--J ........ i i ,r.,.. aisA•An.... . : I ,,..-T,LAii. -2....s.....91 & 64 "2 i +011/01. li-- , . 1 . . r.! -,-11 -,-••••••-:-.1, , 1 1 V/ ' .. I l'i i 1 ........ ::-•,-,. , ' sk .. *'(r i a.13 13 ." f -e.. / • L •.,0.9,1,1 :74L-T,1 .. -....e s \ :,.....,,,0 ' 0 • _ 1 us 4.• 1 G,...A•A:ArA9 9A-9.9: ;• . I A‘S-A.... f . MA., -aa. t a .-.......... I a i i-9.,-,....,.....AA.....; / W.//••• G10.4••• ., • -.- , --___ ) \ill 11: •• ._ ._ ,• ''''` ,.. ::•-, -----. -1101111.11 1 ---..cH- i 1 „. -1, ..,64.-atg RAW, v r4,01. 17 id I 499,.1 f. 1 —- 11...,,.............-r/ arr..,if aer-,eax..) see....- ..0•3 'II , I ,-2\ II I . ,o,, t.-0 42-'1-CLA-111..-avr.-._-) . t....e.e-- r,____ -. i 7* 44 1/04_Le ArJak erF View i A2 FLOOR PLAN:NN, Lornmuni us.:1.-0. i I NORTN RV 9 19 9: -elf VO Church AN 4 ke of k) vle . 1 Pg 0 Al NB isWo A4 goo X imei.Atip Alva( 900 YiRyLighip Ave de L i 1-11 1 Y Vim . / /\ cf n19� 6 1 \ 7lcryl ;le, 3311 il!COS .' \. \ n E ' - l'Sk ' \ • -\frook i- c-- il , GI I c U!. ..Nu, ao... 1 I ?dad �_ • iOS1- 6 vsrt. / --_ __.— nran 1n s•ur�nh� � ►- IiGI D 1/ I / cr / / Gn ss`q"` '. ) w.ivY..a[. I 1 , Ii �"�— !1 v \ I.oa.wr. .. 1P-.00,10)- Nulrn[ArL �. �" II. - .-= I G - I -VII \.,...„3 , �iitif I —r, 111 • l a cxw�a�ni+a6" . 4., 1 1 lir °o i 300 l[v[l�'•�%`% v+'T A[r rm MS. II.xCTU.[Y LEVEL) -$___ _lir INvir u �. -!--t / n �e" _ - EXISTING BUILDING REMODEL (PHASE I-B) ommurn►y 0 Church A3 NOIITN RevNLo 11•/1'I-4.EJdp0. F J 1, \ •�(. NC[\\\'..rN /�1�� fl rr^;1' .1!:7.�071 ••.n Ti- .r T -.r -T- I . , 1 �n 1 •.n' 1 /1 1 .rl Av. / I �'•"I no S' p ?IOW. Irnn n•. k-. .� ■ I♦ a _ L_A�, _. • ORDINANC.1 NO. 3545 • i EXHIBIT "A" • / Jefferson Avenue N.E. All that portion of Jefferson Avenue N.E. , having a width of 60 feet; lying between Tract 32 and Tract 33 of the corrected Plat of Renton Highlands l#2 as recorded in Volume 57 of Plats, Pages 92 through 98, records of King County, Washington; bounded on the north by the easterly extension of the south right-of-way line of N.E. 10th Street from the northeast corner of said Tract 33 to the northwest corner of said Tract 32 of said plat; and bounded on the south. by the easterly extension of the north right-of-way line of N.E. 9th Street from the southeast corner of said Tract 33 to the southwest 'corner of said Tract 32 of said plat ; EXCEPT that portion thereof vacated under City of Renton 0rdirnance #3052, recorded under Auditor's file #7608160614 , records of King County , Washington. • • EXHIBIT • o?.— • • • • • I CITY OF RENTON , WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO . .3545 • YD • AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON , WASHINGTON , VACATING A PORTION 'OF JEFFERSON AVENUE N .E . (VAC-1-81 HIGHLANDS COMMUNITY .CHURCH) WHEREAS a proper petition for vacating a portion of Jefferson Avenue N. E . between N . E . 10th St and N : E . 9th Street , Renton , King County, Washington, was. duly filed with the City Clerk on or about March 6 , 1981 , and said petition having been signed by the owners representing more than two-thirds (2/3) of the property abutting upon such street sought to be vacated ;. and WHEREAS the City. Council by Resolution No . 2388 passed and approved on March 23 , 1981 , and after due investigation , did fix and deteL«line the day of April 27 , 1981 at the hour of 8 : 00 P .M. in the City Council Chambers of the City of Renton to be the time and place for a public hearing thereon, and the City Clerk having giver due notice of such hearing in the manner provided by law, and all persc having been heard appearing in favor of. or in opposition thereto ; and the City Council having considered all information and arguments presented to it , and WHEREAS the Department of Public Works and the Planning Department of the City of Renton having duly considered said petition for said vacation , and having found same to be in the public interest and for the public benefit , and no injury or damage to any person or properties will result from such vacations ; NOW THEREFORE , THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON , WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS : SECTION I : The following described portion of Jefferson Avenue N. E . , to-wit : See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof as if fully set forth herein . • • -1- A BE AND THE SAME IS HEREBY VACATED SUBJECT to an easement over , across , under and on 'all •of the aforedescribed property .in favor of the City for utility and related purposes . AND SUBJECT FURTHER to a City reversionary interest in the property , in the form of a reversionary clause in the conveyance to the abutting owner that the property should revert -to the City if not used exclusively or • church purposes . SECTION II : The City Council hereby elects to charge no fee to Petitioner-Owners for this vacation . SECTION III : This Ordinance shall be effective upon its passage , approval and five days after its publication . A certified copy of this Ordinance shall be filed with the Office of Records and Elections , and as otherwise provided by law. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this llth day of May , 1981 . /fi�'. . `�, De ores A. Mead, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this llth day of May , 1981 . Barbara Y. Shinpoch , Mayor Approved as to form : • �Tti i<t1 �`�ti , tite.-r,•?tiv Lawrence J . ren,..,Ctt�y....;A..ttorney Date of Publication: May 15, 1981 (Summary Form) ,; . 3EXHIP U, - D . q EXHIBIT 8 SIGNERS _cATION BY ZIP CODE VS RENTON RENTON OUTSIDE AREA - ZIP BY ZIP TOTAL SIGNERS ADDRESSES OF RENTON BELLEVUE: 17 17 98004 L 98005 B 98006 18 98007 1 I SSAQUAH: 49 49 98027 49 KENT: 37 37 98031 32 9803E 1 9804E 4 MNTLKE TERRACE 1 1 98043 1 RAVENSDALE: 3 3 98051 3 MAPLE VALLEY: 8 8 98038 8 SNOHOMISH: 2 2 98290 B PUYALLUP: 1 1 98372 i. RENTON: 533 98055 42 39 3 98056 182 164 18 98058 124 20 104 98059 185 36 149 SEATTLE: 55 S5 `38103 1 98105 5 98118 1 98133 1 98136 2 9814E 1 08166 4 98168 5 98178 22 98188 10 98198 3 OTHER: 5 2 3 98225 1 98558 1 99163 1 NOFIND TOTALS:I ALS: 711 261 450 AS PERCENTAGE 36.7% 63.3% RENTON OUTSIDE OF ADDRESSES RENTON fo � P- i , h n /�3 S T , ,• t l c 1744110"itv 1, I 041 r rt ` LT►. • 1 R_3 _ / , 1 • . d___,,. • B \\2 / R R-3 . :?i,.. ., _, .A to /n v 5 : 1 ' bolt/ . sll< t R- 1 oh „ A ,•I -� V • .2,- ' / ) I . al R-3 A, r �J /' t1J. I N E • ill 3 1 + / %' -3 ., ram) 1 ,'1 • s t CI ` 3 4 „if38 . 2 tti .o � t 1 h r . 5/ .• a 8,-- a i •' p-i • • . , (r,!...1_34 , G- 1! o,:: jto tH 15 f� . _ . _ ' , !' ' Opp , 9.1 ka L . . s •e I I ' \ l s . I0. 1 \\� J / —� I I l' ` r I 11 1 O N L/ t . -1 Ff.&j 1 /lJ��- —... 1 ........ :Tip .. ...---• 1 t,e_l•I 1 • 4 Ile 11.1 0 \ IF 'I i i.$ 1 4- . I ' iicif,,, ,ET_,. , .. . . _ , / _. ., . , 53 , ‘,.., . R ,, 1._._, ,. - J \ • • yFI` ^ • ' 1 •1 y ! \�� Q 2! -; t G t • , f • '141 r 1S 1' I 1 • I• .• rr T i .• R•1 2 Alr �3 ; if-=rl-� - - / ! J la 1 1 �� _� Z t — C tit R_1 (-- L _t.! r t - • �.I e a i,Nit ---si \ . ......_. 3th • " • R-2 i _ . Y '— _1 : — " 1 5 . 7 J�` G l • • , /fir I '' NE I II(,HL ANDS r - 1_, ^f I �.-{ C L E t� NT&R Y ,l-r_ •-t- .:�-i1 f, -94:.. l I�`I.1 +.• --1 t -N-e 4Q Q� -4,-e- o-"U "Cc.--/z✓ificano.0 r . - p _ d su.d,=,ti5 1 I t � � o� ,�0 7'i F c.s,-�io.�J r-P.ce P�2 i—: p_ 1 4 .._ .- -. �,r,,4) �-e r� e sv4, SiIZF" , t z C�/�;r exurair - e _ _ , ,v,trf1 coUrLCc 5, I 1i�oa)CuS ray ZiP d .$•:4QDrze%cs.t Z9 `3 8Cc riFr��D usT-- i 1 T ' • l t- •�� R' -24p.�.c ,a.�s s--uP may.' ,,4✓,-� _c- te ' ' •lam t _.Lam' o2 eZa- ''� 1 CL 1.. `,l.• ° 1 �l•/i• ---•—, 1,-. _ , •� `, . . . .... - t• , + ,• Q., s •• I• CO -xil!-.1;A--` C.\' ' . Pa.cJ i�4izac 3 lvzv-c.„,—. 4 _roc".; .• t1 1 r O I/EiTQ.t{ O c�st_so.J t• �/`` •• , - �1 ' ' •_ �'�• 1 S34. rNn Sc Couir CZ°led 2K. n 1*.dAc ('(R•1 ` ' i\'f+ % ' .,, l(ti I;•�l. J -1F' --. P1 1 ' O ,Si2�✓ ! fc�i O $6lalZot� e�iFckSc�— F ( l c �Sla lei,e f c wd v of 303/ WC--IO_ EXHIBIT 8 SIGNERS BY ZIP & ST. ADDRESS. ADDED ZIPS [*7 PER THOMAS GUIDE 92 ED 02-20-1992 Pape 1 LAST NAME 1st NAME ST. ADDRESS CITY ZIP KC Fleagle Barbara L. 1653 106th Ave SE Bellevue 98004 ,L Fieaale Willard F. 1653 106th Ave SE Bellevue 98004 Merilatt Jenifer C. 12201 SElOth St Bellevue 98005 0^•� Marlott Randall L. 12201 SEIOth Street Bellevue 98005* Y� Willis Jeanette V. 6218 122nd Ave SE Bellevue 98006* ( 'y Willis Kirt 6218 122nd Ave SE Bellevue 98006* R ) ', Strasburg William F. 6501 122nd Pi SE Bellevue 98006* ?), Strasburg Mary B. 6501 122nd P1 SE Bellevue 98006 / Strosburo Milton A. 6501 122nd P1 SE Bellevue 98006 _ 1 2 �`�/' \\ Franklin Loren D. 12826 SE41st Bellevue 98006 !'` Franklin Caroline M. 12826 SE41st Ln D-105 Bellevue 98006* V`\ Bridneman Herbery R. 15124 SE43rd Bellevue 98006 �J` V` Bridgeman Fay 15124 SE43rd St B Bellevue 98006* Anthony Barbara J. 13619 SE56th P1 Bellevue 98006* Swanson Margret 4021 Somerset Ave SE Bellevue 98006 Swanson Margaret 4721 Somerset Ave SE Bellevue 98006 Cruea Beverly 1408 140th Ct SE Bellevue 98007 / Clark Jane C. 13211 195th P1 SE Issaquah 98027* Akisnin Karyn 11914 198th Ave SE Issaquah 98027* Akishin Crain 11914 198th Ave SE Issaouan 98027* Smith Marial 12312 202nd P1 SE Issaquah 98027 Smith Susan B. 12312 202nd P1 SE Issaquah 98027 Cooper C. Daniel 12008 206th P1 SE Issaouan 98027* Cooper Erurstine 12008 206th P1 SE Issaouan 98027 Smith Govdow D. 12035 286th PI SE Issaouan 98027 Johnson Robert M. 12325 210 P1 SE issaouah 98027 Johnson Sharon K. 12325 210th PI SE Issaouan 98027 Carsten Robin K. 7017 243rd Ave SE Issaquah 98027* Morrow Donald L. 14705 247th P1 SE Issaquan 98027* Morrow Jean M. 14705 247th P1 SE Issaquah 98027 Alexander Charles 50 Mt.Olimpus Dr SW Issaquah 98027 Alexander Barbara J. 50 Mt.Olvmous Dr SW Issaquah 98027 Studebaker L.D. PO Box 1304 Issaquah 98027 " 3 2- Moore Donna Lee 18621 SE May Valley Rd Issaquah 98027 Moore Ted V. 18621 SE May Valley Rd Issaquah 98027 Z-t- I q1 - 4-9 Johnson Patrica 19131 SE May Valley Road Issaquah 98027* Young Sandra J. 19131 SE May Valley Rd Issaquah 98027 Farrell William 19131 SE May Valley Rd Issaquah 98027 Johnson Kelly 19131 SE May Valley Rd Issaquan 98027* Young David M. 19131 SE May Valley Rd Issaquah 98027 Young Jason S. 19131 SE May Valley Rd Issaquah 98027 Dainardne Wayne 18416 SE122nd Issaquah 98027* Dainardne Karen L. 18416 SE122nd Issaouan 98027* Baiveat Jr. Everett L. 28838 SE123rd St Issaquah 98027* Balyeat Helen M. 20838 SE123rd Issaquah 98027* Lurashi Osi 19886 SE125th St Issaquah 98027* Lurashi Elke F. 19806 SE127th Issaquah 98027 Lurashi E. 19806 SE127th Issaquah 98027 Luraai Ed 19806 SE127th St Issaouah 98027* EXHIBIT 8 SIGNERS BY ZIP & ST. ADDRESS, ADDED ZIPs (*] PER THOMAS GUIDE 92 ED 02-20-1992 Page 2 LAST NAME 1st NAME ST. ADDRESS CITY ZIP KC Luraohi John 19806 SE127th Issaquah 98027 — (7 Wales Carolyn S. 20017 SE127th Issaquah 98027* Wales Steve 20027 SE127th Issaquah 98027 Eales Jason 20027 SE127th Issaquah 98027 Wales Steve 20027 SE127th Issaouah 98027 Wales Larry 20027 SE127th Issaquah 98027 Breeden Viroinia L. 21113 6E135 Issaouah 98027 Brendan Barry 21113 SE135th Issaouah 98027 Covey Sheryl R. 25006 SE1460 St Issaouah 98027* Covey Jennifer 25006 SE146th St Issaouah 98027* Covey Joe 25006 SE146th Issaouah 98027* Stelma Jerry 26414 SE154th P1 Issaquah 98027* Shurte Brent M. 24317 SE163rd St Issaquah 98027* Shurtz Susan 24317 SE167th St Issaquah 98027 Dauer Al 19720 SE21st Issaquah 98027 Daher Jean 19720 SE21st lssaguah 98027 Schlemeier Michael D. 26676 SE31st Issaquah 98027 Fortin Karen 23320 113th P1 SE Kent 98031* Neveux Christopher E. 27653 120th P1 SE Kent 98031* Neveux Derlyn J. 27653 120th PI SE Kent 98031* Heath Sthephen K. 22315 123rd P1 SE Kent 98031* Heath Doreen 22315 123rd PI SE Kent 98031 Simon Kimberly 22327 123rd PI SE Kent 98031 Schwantes Venita P. 20229 125th P1 SE Kent 98031 Schwantes Timothy D. 20229 125th P1 SE Kent 98031 Buck S. David 21429 130th Ave SE Kent 98031* Ekness Michael 11020 Kent Kanalev Rd Kent 98031* Snyder Gary 11352 SE 211th Ln #43 Kent 98031* Lynn Jerry 12338 SE204th Kent 98031* Lynn Kristi 12338 SE204th Kent 98031 Yeaton Jr Lorin 12346 SE204th Kent 98031 - 3 Z Yeaton Therese 12346 SE204th Kent 98031 Armstrong Denise 1101 SE208th #114 Kent 98031 Snyder Jennifer 11352 SE211th Ln M43 Kent 98031* Neff Susan M. 12368 SE214th St Kent 98031* Neff Jr. John W. 12368 SE214th Kent 98031* Joseph John T. 12540 SE217th St Kent 98031 Joesoh Jeanette 12540 SE217tn St Kent 98031* Horner John P. 11709 SE225 St Kent 98031* Horner Kirsti L. 11709 SE225 St Kent 98031* Eard Stephanie 11623 SE227th P1 Kent 98031* Redding Steven C. 11024 SE233rd P1 Kent 98031 Moore David C. 12337 SE237th P1 Kent 98031 Moore Shelley L. 12337 SE237th P1 Kent 98031 Lennick Chris 12038 SE250th Pi Kent 98031 Bruinsma Tena 10935 SE253rd #202 Kent 98031* Lowder Norm 12725 SE254th Ct Kent 98031 Lowder Carol 12725 SE254th Ct Kent 98031* Cauohie Wayne 308 Summit Ave N. #2 Kent 98031* EXHIBIT 8 SIGNERS BY ZIP & ST. ADDRESS, ADDED ZIPs I*1 PER THOMAS GUIDE 92 ED 02-20-1992 Pane 3 LAST NAME 1st NAME ST. ADDRESS CITY ZIP KC Stove George B. 9518 6200th St Kent 98032 1 Wilson Sandra 23313 208th Ave SE Maple Valley 98038* Tripoli Karla 23313 208th Ave SE Marie Valley 98038* Bius Anthony D. 26014 225th Ct SE Maple Valley 98038 Blas Jean A. 26014 225th Ct SE Maple Valley 98038* Shiels Ruth 23726 6E253rd P1 Maple Valley 98038 Shiels Ruth 23726 SE2SS Maple Valley 98038 Appleeate Susan J. 21855 SE266th P1 Maple Valley 98038 / Appleeate Steve 21855 SE266th P1 Maple Valley 98038 J Conrads Randal G. 21819 144th Ave SE Kent 98042* Conrads Sharon 21819 144th Ave SE Kent 98042 Hund Wilma F. 22033 148th Ave SE Kent 98042 Hund Clarence 22033 148th Ave SE Kent 98042 ___./ Burrill Gerry 7062 123rd Ave SE Mtlk Terrace 98043 • 1 Lain Steven 25212 358th Ave SE Ravensdale 98051* 3 Paul Richard D. 25212 358th Ave SE Ravensdale 98051* Paul Sara E. 25212 358th Ave SE Ravensdale 98051 St Clair Geneva 19416 108th SE Renton 98055* yes t \ Paul Herman 51 Burnett Ave S Renton 98055* \ Paul Marie 51 Burnett Ave S Renton 98055* Jackson Rick M. 4702 Davis Ave S Renton 98055* Flory Iris 1300 Eagle Rdpe Dr S Renton 98055* Kinney Nellie 2205 Maple Valley Hwy Renton 98055* Finseth Virginia 1616 Morris Ave S Renton 98055* Henry Michelle D. 1716 Morris Ave S Renton 98055* Henry Ron E. 1716 Morris Ave S Renton 98055* Moreland Kenneth 809 N6th St Renton, 98055* Harris E.B. 4005 Park Ave N Renton 98055* Tharp Margaret 333 Renton Ave S C1/21 Renton 98055* Sims Micah 530 S 28th Pi Renton 98055* Burt William E. 1425 S Puget Dr C6 Renton 98055* Sims Jason 530 528th PI Renton 98055* 3 Z Sims Maureen E. 530 628th PI Renton 98055* Z Sims Richard E. 530 528th P1 Renton 98055* 2.1-� Thatcher Patrick 805 628th Ct Renton 98055* 3 Thatches Ellen M 805 628th Ct Renton 98055* Thatcher Khrilee 805 528th Ct Renton 98055* Thatcher Kyle 805 S28th Ct Renton 98055* Reschice Armin W. 912 529th Ct Renton 98055* Coucnor Charles J. 802 631st Renton 98055* Couohran Sharon 802 531st Renton 98055* Sharpe Bruce 815 631st St Renton 98055* Mayer Rebeca D. 1007 631st Ct Renton 98055* 1 Mayer Michael L. 1007 631st Ct Renton 98055* Miller Diane 1814 SE 121st P1 Renton 98055* Childers David L. 10311 SE166th Renton 98055* yes -s- Puriell Jeffrey B. 3325 SE16th Al Renton 98055* Purcell Greo 3325 SE16th P1 Renton 98055* Collier Ann E. 11113 SE183rd PL Renton 98055* yes 3 EXHIBIT 8 SIGNERS BY ZIP & ST. ADDRESS, ADDED ZIPs t*] PER THOMAS GUIDE 92 ED 02-20-1992 Page 4 LAST NAME 1st NAME ST. ADDRESS CITY ZIP KC _ y /b Miller Diane E. 1814 SE21st P1 Renton 98055* Miller Greg R. 1814 SE21st Pi Renton 98055* Pike Kimberly M. 1907 SE22nd P1 Renton 98055* Kier Brian 600 SW5th Ct L-104 Renton 98055* Kier Heather L. 600 SW5th Ct L-104 Renton 98055* Lake Roger 1718 Talbot Rd S Renton 98055* Prather Andrew 278 Thomas Ave SW Renton 98055* Prather Micheal A. 278 Thomas Ave SW Renton 98055* Prather Andrew 278 Thomas Ave Renton 98055* Downs Dawn 407 Williams Ave S Renton 98055*, Farrell Lois N. 8211 116th Ave SE Renton 98056* yes__ Farrell Darvel B. 8211 116th SE Renton 98056* yes Laminec Alford 8221 116th Renton 98056* yes Janet Ernie 8226 118th BE Renton 98056* yes Janet Donna Kay 8226 118th SE Renton 98056* yes Howard John S. 6407 119th Ave SE Renton 98056* yes — 11- Howard Valerie D. 6407 119th Ave SE Renton 98056 yes DeWitt Morri Ann 7230 122nd Ave SE Renton 98056* yes Woodbridae Holly 8229 127th Ave SE Renton 98056* yes Woodbridoe Linda 8229 127th Ave SE Renton 98056* yes Woodbridae Peter 8229 127th Ave SE Renton 98056* yes Huffman 'liana 8413 127th Ave SE Renton 98056* yes 6adv David J. 9536 132nd Ave SE Renton 98056* Arfsten Earl 861 Aberdeen Ave Renton 98056* Arfsten Grace 861 Aberdeen NE Renton 98056* Arfsten Earl 861 Aberdeen NE Renton 98056* Leckie Ronald 1604 Aberdeen Ave NE Renton 98056* Leckie Bernvece L. 1604 Aberdeen AVe NE Renton 98056* Timer Mary Lou 355 Bronson Way NE Renton 98056* Chodykin Vanessa 523 Bronson P1 NE Renton 98056* Chodykin Stan 573 Bronson Pi NE Renton 98056* - 3 5 Olds Jr. Petrude W. 1708 Camas Ave NE Renton 98056* Pillo Ben 860 Chelan Ave NE Renton 98056* Pillo Violet 860 Chelan Ave NE Renton 98056* Ersland Berniece 670 Dayton Ave NE Renton 98056 Sims Alice I. 675 Dayton Ave NE Renton 98056* Sehorn John C. 859 Edmonds Ave NE Renton 98056* Ruscheinskv Karen L. 1417 Edmonds Ave NE Renton 98056* Savannah Alice 640 Ferndale PI NE Renton 98056* Hawkins Deidre 920 Ferndale Cir. NE Renton 98056* Denton Heioa 943 Ferndale Cir NE Renton 98056* St Clair Shannon 616 Giennwood Ct Renton 98056* Box Stacey 907 Harrington Ave NE Renton 98056* Banasky Ruth 1100 Harrington Ave NE Renton 98056* Muilenburo Bruce 1731 Harrinoton Ave NE Renton 98056* West Jane 2005 Harrington Cir Renton 98056* Sinclair Suzanne E. 2007 Harrington Cir NE Renton 98056* Leonard E. Irene 1450 Hillcrest Ln NE Renton 98056* McEwen Florin E. 1456 Hillcrest Ln NE Renton 98056* 1_, EXHIBIT 6 SIGNERS BY ZIP & ST. ADDRESS, ADDED ZIPs i*] PER THOMAS GUIDE 92 ED 02-20-1992 Pape 5 LAST NAME 1st NAME ST. ADDRESS CITY ZIP KC Sargent Irene 1460 Hillcrest Renton 98056* Grure Doris A. 1482 Hillcrest Ln NE Renton 98056* Peterson Kenneth L. 447 Index Ave NE Renton 98056* Husbands Gary 641 Index P1 NE Renton 98056* \O Veitch Carole B. 836 Index Court NE Renton 98056* Veitch Don 836 index Court NE Renton 98056* Vansivre Eleanor 1340 Index Ave NE Renton 98056* Minato Howard Michael 1503 Index Ave SE Renton 98056* Vader Gavle 608 Jefferson NE Renton 98056* Huebner Robert F. 1700 Jones Ave NE Renton 98056* Huebner Frieda M 1700 Jones Ave NE Renton 98056* er Farrow Joan S. 1716 Jones Ave NE Renton 98056* bi(E 5 OMuhich Peri 856 Kirkland NE Renton 98056* 'Muhich Steven C. 856 Kirkland Ave NE Renton 98056* Alton Sharon 920 Kirkland Ave NE Renton 98056* 41 Joss Catherine M. 920 Kirkland Ave NE Renton 98056* Moore Hertha 1021 Kirkland Ave NE Renton 98056* Moore Hertha 1021 Kirkland Ave NE Renton 98056* Bartley Dorothea 1033 Kirkland Ave NE Renton 98056* Foroev Mark 1250 Kirkland NE Renton 98056* Jackson G. Paul 821 Lynnwood Ave NE Renton 98056* Matthews Sylvia B. 3605 Meadows Ave N Renton 98056* Johnson Davin Allen 3606 Meadow Ave N. Renton 98056 Johnson Ken L. 500 Monroe Ave NE *E-6 Renton 98056 Brown Marguerite 1309 Monroe Ave NE Renton 98056* Johnson Jeffery A. 500 Morrow Ave NE #E6 Renton 98056* Hacker Peter E. 83 Monterey P1 NE Renton 98056* Harkett Diane E. 83 Monterey P1 NE Renton 98056* Swanson Jon B. 152 Monterey P1 NE Renton 98056* Swanson Joanne D. 152 Monterey PI NE Renton 98056* Herman Diana L. 2436 Monterey Ave NE Renton 98056* Smith David M. 1308 N26th Renton 98056* Smith Barbara 1308 N26th Renton 98056* Donald Kay D. 1211 N28th PI Renton 98056* Thomson Cheryl 813 N29th St Renton 98056* Thomson William (Bill) 813 N29th St Renton 98056* Anderson Dave 820 N29th St Renton 98056* Anderson Gloria 820 N29th Renton 98056* Vancleave Howard 1930 N2nd St Renton 98056* Boidan Mae 1109 N31st St Renton 98056* Hatch Sherry A. 1201 N31st St Renton 98056* Jenzen Joyce M. 801 N32nd Renton 98056* Pollex Jack 919 N33rd St Renton 98056* Pollex Lois 919 N33rd St Renton 98056* Mcsherry Gave 1105 N34th St Renton 98056* Dahlcuist Naplia M. 1316 N34th St Renton 98056* Dahlouist Dan 1316 N34th Renton 98056* Evans Donna 1017 N35th Renton 98056* Sartore Annette 1403 N36th Renton 98056* EXHIBIT 8 SIGNERS BY ZIP & ST. ADDRESS, ADDED ZIPs E*1 PER THOMAS GUIDE 92 ED 02-26-1992 Paae 6 LAST NAME 1st NAME ST. ADDRESS CITY ZIP KC Sartore Eugene R. 1463 N36th Renton 98056* Gifford Doris L. 3054 NE 15th D54 Renton 98056* Danielson Lester I, 2204 NE 24th St Renton 98056* Danielson Della M. 2204 NE 24th St Renton 98056* Fannino Joan 2021 NE Jones Ave Renton 98056* Goodner Paul 4300 NE Sunset Blvd. M- Renton 98056* Goodner Jean 4300 NE Sunset Blvd. Renton 98056* Dere Jeffrey 2326 NE10th P1 Renton 98056* • Dere Julia 2326 NElOth P1 Renton 98056* Thornton Steven G. 2707 NElOth - C Renton 98056* Thornton Teresa 2707 NElOth - C Renton 98056* Rollis Viroinia 2901 NE10th 6431 Renton 98056* Barnhart Grace 3030 NE10th Street Renton 98056 ®—Jackson-Monson Sharon L. 3031 NE10th Renton 98056* Cullor Nellie J. 3514 NElOth P1. Renton 98056* Smith Ione 3404 NElOth P1 Renton 98056* Harbeck G'aub 3507 NElOth St SE Renton 98056* Harbeck Mary Lou 3507 NElOth St Renton 98056* Narbeck Don 3507 NElOth St Renton 98056* q"? Pawson Kathy 3532 NE14th St Renton 98056* Gusseck Trudy 3030 NE15th B-30 Renton 98056* e Deboer William L. 3030 NE15th St Renton 98056* Suttle Roper 2225 NE16th Renton 98056* 0 V Nyblom Diana Lee 4425 NE17th St Renton 98056* 4 Petit Marlene 2516 NE19th Renton 98056* Petit John E. 2516 NE19th St Renton 98056* Stewart Mike 2825 NE21st Renton 98056* Stewart La Donna 2825 NE21st Renton 98056* 1 Thomson Stave E. 3918 NE21st St Renton 98056* Thomson Nancy 3918 NE21st St Renton 98056* Robertson Becky 5120 NE21st St Renton 98056* Akesson Gail L. 2408 NE23rd St Renton 98056* Akesson Allan T. 2408 NE23rd St Renton 98056* Krauss Robert W. 2708 NE24th St Renton 98056* Krauss Carol F. 2708 NE24th St Renton 98056* Stanberry Georeia 2201 NE28th Renton 98056 D'Neail James 1961 NE3rd #104 Renton 98056* DeJono Brian 2307 NE4th St E306 Renton 98056* Blood Vetha 3014 NE4th C16-14 Renton 98056* Stigall Krista 3788 NE4th Renton 98056* Stioall Richard 3788 NE4th Renton 98056* Mieske Julie 3788 NE4th St. F-303 Renton 98056* Vork Cheri A 2508 NE5th PI Renton 98056* Willenboro Daved 2205 NE6th P1 Renton 98056* Johnson William A. 3917 rJE6th St Renton 98056* Johnson Lee Ann 3917 NE6th St Renton 98056* Pryor James A. 2805 NE7th St Renton 98056* Kahn Laura M. 3318 NE7th P1 Renton 98056* Kampschror Jean U. 3413 NE7th St Renton 98056* 1 EXHIBIT 8 SIGNERS BY ZIP & ST. ADDRESS, ADDED ZIPS [*] PER THOMAS GUIDE 92 ED 02-20-1992 Page 7 LAST NAME 1st NAME ST. ADDRESS CITY ZIP KC Keener Mary E. 4013 NE7th St Renton 98056* Keener Harvey A. 4013 NE7th St Renton 98056* Seel Elsie M. 2213 NE8th St Renton 98056* Evans Velma C. 2905 NE8th St Renton 98056* Borcners Janis L. 2907 NE8th P1 Renton 98056* Borchers Donald G. 2907 NE8th P1 Renton 98056* Peterson Laura 2908 NE8th P1 Renton 98056* Peterson Lottie 2908 NE8th Pi Renton 98056 Peterson Rebecca 2908 NE8th P1 Renton 98056 Herring iris 2908 NE8th PI Renton 98056* Woodbridge Mike 2924 NE8th St Renton 98056* Woodbridge Brenda 2924 NE8th St Renton 98056* 1( Vaughn Alvina D. 3013 NE8th St Renton 98056* ...A....' Lemenacer Magpie 2600 NE9th St Renton 98056* Lemenaoer Gary 2600 NE9th St Renton 98056* Cobb Cynthia 2607 NE9th St Renton 98056* Cobb Tony A. 2609 NE9th St Renton 98056* Cobb Tony A. 2609 NE9th St Renton 98056* Beach George B. 3612 NE9th St Renton 98056* Beach Viola A. 3612 NE9tn St Renton 98056* Reas Brian D. 3704 NE9th Ct Renton 98056* Reik Lave A 3709 NE9th Ct Renton 98056* Smith Margaret 1002 Newport Ct NE Renton 98056* Smith C.R. 1002 Newport Ct NE Renton 98056* Courtney Jacque PO Box 2653 Renton 98056 Smith Christine 851 Queen Ave NE Renton 98056* Smith Patricia A. 675 Redmond Ave NE Renton 98056* Hurter Lynda 1119 Redmond Ave NE Renton 98056* Hurter Donald 1119 Redmond Ave NE Renton 98056* Shewchuk Elizebeth A. 13844 5E131 St Renton 98056* yes 4'e (0 i T Vossler Sharon 14118 SE135th St Renton 98056* yes 5 Childers Glenda 12511 SE166th Renton 98056* yes 1 /f Johansen Christine 12025 SE184th Renton 98056 yes fermi" Koenicke Carol 3112 SE18th St Renton 98056* O'Neal: Jim 1901 SE3rd #104 Renton 98056* Close Steve 12031 SE93rd St Renton 98056* yes Yant Terry 12214 Sr96tn P1 Renton 98056* yes Thornton David W. 902 Sunset Blvd NE *D1 Renton 98056 Augustan Donald R. 912 Sunset Blvd NE Renton 98056* Auouston Frances M. 912 Sunset Blvd NE Renton 98056* Bartley Kevin L. 1150 Sunset Blvd NE 102 Renton 98056* Foss Eric 1150 Sunset Blvd NE#102 Renton 98056* Spann Norman R. 4308 Sunset Blvd NE Renton 98056* Antin Ernie 508 Windsor P1 NE Renton 98056* / Antin Norene 508 Windsor P1 NE Renton 98056* Cunningham Verna Louise 16532 117th SE Renton 98058* yes Huddleston Tricia 19463 122nd PI SE Renton 98058* yes Huddleston Garth N. 19463 122nd P1 SE Renton 98058* yes L]� 4 Huddleston Tricia J. 19463 122nd P1 SE Renton 98058* yes EXHIBIT 8 SIGNERS BY Z:P & ST. ADDRESS, ADDED ZIPs C*) PER THOMAS GUIDE 92 ED 02-20-1992 Page 8 LAST NAME 1st NAME ST. ADDRESS CITY ZIP KC Huddleston Neal A. 19465 122nd P1 SE Renton 98058* yes Ladd Patricia E. 17026 123rd Ave SE Renton 98058* yes Ladd John S. 17026 123rd Ave SE Renton 98058* yes Dickson Vera R. 19402 124th Ave SE Renton 98058* yes Lewis Kevin 16925 125th P1 SE Renton 98058* yes Lewis Clary 16925 125th P1 SE Renton 98058* yes Davis Amy 16925 125th P1 SE Renton 98058* yes Tennison Elizibeth 16101 126th Ave SE Renton 98058* yes Markealli Pauline 16613 126th Ave SE Renton 98058* yes Markealli John J. 16613 126th Ave SE Renton 98058* yes Neuman Michael J. 16230 131st Ave SE Renton 98058* yes Moore Judith A. 16125 133P1 SE Renton 98058* yes Wilson Holly 18313 134th SE Renton 98058* yes Wilson Scott R. 18313 134th SE Renton 98058* yes , Kehm Dawn 18436 134th Ave SE Renton 98058* yes a CS Ayer Katherine L. 16413 142nd P1 SE Renton 98058* yes �, 1.° Stump Alfred L. 15441 144th Ave SE Renton 98058* yes Choy Eugene 16505 146th SE Renton 98058* yes Sanchez Sharon 14223 148th SE Renton 98058* yes Hurd Wilma F. 22033 148th Ave SE Renton 98058* yes Mills Hilda 15224 150th Lane SE Renton 98058* yes Down Anna 17526 151st SE Renton 98058* yes Kruse Jay E. 18302 152nd Ave SE Renton 98058* yes Kruse Chris 18302 152nd Ave SE Renton 98058* yes Foss Alien 17815 154th Ave SE Renton 98058* yes Foss Randy 17815 154th Ave SE Renton 98058* yes Carnahan Randle 16921 157th P1 SE Renton 98058* ves Carnahan David E. 16921 157th P1 SE Renton 98058* yes Duvall Lawrence L. 16502 161st Ave SE Renton 98058* yes Juron Janie EL 17836 161st Ct SE Renton 98058* yes Borland Christine M. 18021 161st Ct Renton 98058* yes Borland William M. 18021 161st Ct Renton 98058* yes Campbell Carol 17617 162nd Ave SE Renton, 98058* yes Thomas Steve 17245 189th P1 SE Renton 98058* yes Mack Janice M. 13408 191 P1 SE Renton 98058* yes Verner P. 18715 E Sorina Lake SE Renton 98058* yes 1 Reed Darlene B. 1632 Index Ave SE Renton 98058* Poole Timothy L. 1066 Kirkland Ave SE Renton 98058* Rablin Madonna M. 1607 Lake Youngs Way SE Renton 98058* Ralin Rick A. 1607 Lake Younos Way SE Renton 98058 McCabe Ronald 16E2 Lake Younos Way SE Renton 98058* McCabe Karen A. 1622 Lake Young Way SE Renton 98058* Bukoski Robert 1687 Monroe Ave se Renton 98058* / Bukoski Donna 1687 Morrow Ave SE Renton 98058* y Baker Debra 17720 Petrovitsky Rd Renton 98058* yes �j Jarvis Jana 16214 SE 178th PI Renton 98058* yes Farrell Wm 15930 SE Jones Rd. Renton 98058* ves N Farrell Norda E. 15930 SE Jones Rd Renton 98058* yes Scott Michole 17312 SE Maple Valley Rd Renton 98058* yes EXHIBIT 8 SIGNERS BY ZIP & ST. ADDRESS, ADDED ZIPS [*J PER THOMAS GUIDE 92 ED 02-20-1992 Page 9 LAST NAME 1st NAME ST. ADDRESS CITY ZIP KC Goodwin Kathleen L. 17410 SE Renton-MV Rd Renton 98058* yes 1---- . 1 Seeman Dale E. 3000 SE Royal Hills Dr Renton 98058* Shook Tracey 3000 SE Royal Hills Dr Renton 95058* Collauo Jean 3000 SE Royal Hill Dr Renton 98058* Hill Justin 3000 SE Royal Hills Dr Renton 98058* Jettore Mary L. 3000 SE Royal Hill DR Renton 98058* Suares Dolore 3000 SE Royal Hills Renton 98058* Suarez Dolires 3000 SE Royal Hills Renton 98058* Matteson Naydene 3000 SE Royal Hills DR Renton 98058* Stevens Marie A. 14019 SE100th PL Renton 98058* yes Stevens Thurston L. 14019 SE100th P1 Renton 98058* yes White Anthony A. 13627 SE148TH L Renton 98058* yes Caldwell Harold R. 15561 SE148TH Renton 98058* yes Mercer Marianne 12921 SE160th St Renton 98058* yes Mercer Ronald E. 12921 SE160th St Renton 98058* yes Phelps Paul R. 12837 SE161st Renton 98058* yes '„7.19 Phelps Judith I. 12837 SE161st Renton 98058* yes Stewart Sandy L. 12848 SE161st St Renton 98058* yes '1' "II Stewart Leonard R. 12848 SE161st St Renton 98058* yes Lawler Ronald D. 14100 SE162nd P1 Renton 98058* yes Lawles Cheryl L. 14100 Se162nd P1 Renton 98058* yes Hummel Lorraine 13821 SE163rd St Renton 98058* yes -^- Carlson Lucretia 11504 SE165th St Renton 98058* yes Etter Leah 12224 SE165th St Renton 98058* yes Etter Ralph A. 12224 SE165th St Renton 98058* yes Chrison Tracy 16300 SE165th St Renton 98058* yes Chrison Garry 16300 SE165th St Renton 98058* yes Rockey Lynn 14529 SE167 St Renton 98058* yes Rockney Daniel 14529 5E167 St. Renton 98058* yes Purcell Elizabeth 3325 SE16th P1 Renton 98058* Palmer Jerald S. 11860 SE170th P1 Renton 98058* yes White Linda 13623 6E171 P1 Renton 98058* yes Darrah Roy A. 11615 SE171st P1 Renton 98058* yes Kassebaum Jennifer 13748 SE172nd St Renton 98058* yes Kassebaum James 13748 SE172nd St Renton 98058* yes i II Calkins Barbara J. 16040 SE173rd Renton 98058* yes 4 C5 Corouz John P. 11917 SE175th *304 Renton 98058* yes et-' ` Shiever Betsy F. 11917 SE175th St L-205 Renton 98058* yes Shiever Andre Z. 11917 SE175th Renton 98058* yes McCormich H. Victor 15224 SE175th P1 Renton 98058* yes Harris Lee 14300 SE176th *0-2 Renton 98058* yes Smith Roger E. 15510 SE178th P1 Renton 98058* yes Smith Lois M 15510 SE178th P1 Renton 98058* yes Harkless Rosalie 15708 SE178th Ct Renton 98058* yes Harking David L. 15708 SE178th St Renton 98058* yes Stewart Scott C. 16201 SE178th Renton 98058* yes i Stewart Cheryl 16201 SE178th Renton 98058* yes Farvis Mark 16214 SE178th P1 Renton 98058* yes Davis Ron 14257 SE179th P1 Renton 98058* yes • EXHIBIT 8 SIGNERS BY ZAP & ST. ADDRESS, ADDED ZIPs I*J PER THOMAS GUIDE 92 ED 02-20-1992 Pace 10 LAST NAME 1st NAME ST. ADDRESS CITY ZIP KC Peterson Charles A. 14215 SE180th Pi Renton 98058* yes Peterson Diane C. 14215 SE180th P1 Renton 98058* yes Peterson C. Aaron 14215 SE180th P1 Renton 98058 yes Potts Larry A. 14115 SE182nd Renton 98058* yes Potts Diane 14115 SE182nd St Renton 98058* yes Hoyt Cherly A. 14202 SE183rd St Renton 98058* yes -17 York Erik Douglas 14527 SE183rd St Renton 98058* yes e 5 ' York Larry S. 14527 SE183rd St Renton 98058* yes ,v York Ruth 14527 SE183rd St Renton 98058* yes — L'Z Couier Mark R. 11113 SE184th P1 Renton 98058* yes Johansen Andy 12025 SE184th Renton 98058* yes Immel Celesle 13026 SE184th P1 Renton 98058* yes Smith Patti L. 14930 SE184th St Renton 98058* yes Smith Paul 14930 SE184th St Renton 98058* yes Mullin Tony 13001 6E188 Renton 98056* yes Mullin Chris 13001 SE188th Renton 98058* yes Muller Keri 13001 SE188th Renton 98058* yes Roenicke William L. 3112 SE18th Street Renton 98058* Thompson Doris R. 11612 SE196th St Renton 98058* yes F. TO 7...- Darrah Dorothy M. 11615 SE196th Renton 98058* yes Hauck Wilma 3108 SE6th Renton 98058* Millikar Irene A. 2052 SE8th PI Renton 98058* McComas Glen 11221 130th Ave SE Renton 98059* yes Feldmann Nancy 7409 135th P1 SE Renton 98059* yes Feldmann Cary L. 7409 135th PI SE Renton 98059* yes McComas Medeline 11221 137th Ave SE Renton 98059* yes --v 7 Scaooini Cynthia 12815 138th Ave SE Renton 98059* yes Scaopini James B. 12815 138th Ave SE Renton 98059* yes Peacock Esther 12829 138th Ave SE Renton 98059* yes Hayden Martha 10630 140th Ave SE Renton 98059* Lamb David P. 14434 141st PI SE Renton 98059* yes Lamb Sharron K. 14434 141st P1 SE Renton 98059* yes i Crozier Hugh W. 14427 142nd P1 SE Renton 98059* yes "- 2.1 Crozier Carol A. 14427 142nd PI SE Renton 98059* yes Allen Vickie 14120 143rd Ave SE Renton 98059* yes Scott J. Richard 14213 143rd Ave SE Renton 98059* yes .�._ /7 Scott Judith Ann 14213 143rd Ave SE Renton 98059* yes Scott Deborah Ann 14213 143rd Ave SE Renton 98059* yes Barber Curtis A. 14218 143rd Ave SE Renton 98059* yes Knudson Mark 14252 145th PI SE Renton 98059* yes Knudson Glenda Y. 14252 145th P1 SE Renton 98059* yes Trask Mary Ann 16650 147th Ave SE Renton 98059* yes Ross Eva 18104 147th Ave SE Renton 98059* yes Herring Carol J. 10606 148th Ave SE Renton 98059* yes Herrinc Carol 10606 148th Ave SE Renton 98059* yes Hayden Brian 10630 148th SE Renton 98059* yes Peterson Sharle 11203 148th Ave SE Renton 98059* yes Repenn Ryan 12422 149th Ave SE Renton 98059* Bennett Marty 9506 150th PI SE Renton 98059* yes EXHIBIT 8 SIGNERS BY ZIP & ST. ADDRESS, ADDED ZIPs 1*i PER THOMAS GUIDE 92 ED 02-20-1992 Pace 11 LAST NAME 1st NAME ST. ADDRESS CITY ZIP KC Bennett Levert 9506 150th P1 SE Renton 98059* yes -') Mills Walt L. 15224 150th SE Renton 98059* yes Lobb Esther 11512 155th Ave SE Renton 98059* yes Weisser Gary 12236 155th SE Renton 98059* yes Weisser Leslee 12236 155th SE Renton 98059 yes Brooks Allan 13908 156th Ave SE Renton 98059* yes Brooks Tamie Johnson 13908 156th Ave SE Renton 98059* yes Wressell Caliy 14522 156th Ave SE Renton 98059* yes Wright Carol 14412 157th Pi SE Renton 98059* yes Wright Jon D. 14417 157th P1 SE Renton Renton 98059* yes Lunde Jaynes P. 14428 157th P1 SE Renton 98059* yes Newell Steven E. 14714 158th Ave SE Renton 98059* yes Newell Pam 14714 158th Ave SE Renton 98059* yes r Himmelman Marcella 11409 161st Ave SE Renton 98059* yes VI Holbert Pamela 14635 161st Ave SE Renton 98059* yes Patterson Muriel 12617 162nd Ave SE Renton 98059* yes Avouo Bonnie J. 13421 162nd Ave SE Renton 98059* yes Avoiio Mark K. 13421 162nd Ave SE Renton 98059* yes i'----,",) Wise Norman 14541 167th P1 SE Renton 98059* yes Wise Carolyn S. 14541 167th P1 SE Renton 98059* yes Hudson Opal 13235 168th Ave SE Renton 98059* yes Hudson David R. 13235 168th Ave SE Renton 98059* yes McCormack A. Verdell 14549 171st Ave SE Renton 98059* yes Tnolis Warp 12015 176th Ave SE Renton 98059* yes Inglis Theresa 12015 176th Ave SE Renton 98059* yes Bantell Merrely 14215 177 Ave SE Renton 98059* yes Bantill Amy 14215 177th Ave SE Renton 98059* yes Bantell Merrely 14215 177th Ave SE Renton 98059* yes Sehorn Donna M. 13424 178th Ave SE Renton 98059* yes Hyde Sandra D. 13352 191st P1 SE Renton 98059* yes Hyde Jordan 13352 191st P1 SE Renton 98059* yes Frizzey Robert W. 13403 191st P1 SE Renton 98059* yes Frizzell Robert W. 13403 191st PL SE Renton 98059* yes Mack David P. 13408 191st P1 SE Renton 98059* yes Clark Mark V. 13211 195th PI SE Renton 98059* yes Cook Linda Kay 13628 196th SE Renton 98059 yes Vanoelt Terry 14510 200th Ave SE Renton 98059* yes Van Pelt Win 14510 200th Ave SE Renton 98059* yes Postiewait Linda 15636 203rd Ave SE Renton 98059* yes Boltz Delbert T. 305 Chelan Ave SE Renton 98059* Boltz Maxine 305 Chelan Ave SE Renton 98059* Howard Kipp E. 1332 Duvall NE #D42 Renton 98059* Millet Jennifer 1332 Duvell NE #D-42 Renton 98059* Howard III Porter L. 13431 E Lake Kathleen Dr Renton 98059* yes McInnis Rod 13717 E Lk Kathlen Dr SE Renton 98059* yes ✓,.. c\ McInnis Don 13717 E Lk Kathlen Dr SE Renton 98059* yes Ernst Lois F. 951 Hoquiam Ave NE Renton 98059* Ernst Paul A. 951 Hoquiam Ave NE Renton 98059* Reed Jr John C. 2230 Ilwaco Ave NE Renton 98059* J EXHIBIT 8 SIGNERS BY ZIP & ST. ADDRESS, ADDED ZIPs I*3 PER THOMAS GUIDE 92 ED 02-20-1992 Pace 12 LAST NAME 1st NAME ST. ADDRESS CITY ZIP KC Reed Donna 2230 Ilwaco Ave NE Renton 98059* McCormack Lola Mae 14549 171st Ave SE Renton 98059* yes (-- -") _ Keil Sharon M. 4327 NE22nd Ct Renton 98059* Keil Ken 4327 NE22nd Ct Renton 98059* Walker Sherri 4510 NE22nd PI Renton 98059* Davies Beverly J. 4711 NE24TH Renton 98059* Morrissey Cameron L. 10717 Renton-Issaouah Rd Renton 98059* ves Gay Patricia 15043 SE 113th Renton 98059* yes 1‘''`7 Youkowski R. Jean 14716 SE May Valley Rd Renton 98059* yes Scott Laura Lea 17312 SE May Valley Rd Renton 98059* yes Kittelsor, Sam 14525 SE Ren-Iss Rd Renton 98059* yes Peterson Deane 201 SE Union Ave #66 Renton 98059* ,(. '� Peterson Harold 201 SE Union Ave #66 Renton 98059* `� Ostrander Kathy A. 14010 SE100th P1 Renton 98059* yes Ostrander David A. 14010 SE100th P1 Renton 98059* yes Braaten Ann Marie 13604 SE107th P1 Renton 98059 yes Wilson James W. 13612 SE107th P1 Renton 98059* yes Brunner Doris A. 13636 SE107th P1 Renton 98059* yes Alexander Dan 15035 SE112nd St Renton 98059* yes Alexander Denise 15035 SE112th St Renton 98059* yes Holmes Troy 14617 SE113th St Renton 98059* yes Holmes Jennifer 14617 SE113th St Renton 98059* yes Muir Jr Bill 15004 SE114th St Renton 98059* yes Muir Barbara A. 15004 SE1i4th St Renton 98059* yes Wilken Cindy 15075 SE116th St Renton 98059* yes Smyth Adeline 15051 SE128th Renton 98059* yes in,'►i Smyth Isaac Dean 15051 SE128th Renton 98059* yes Hoesf Sandra A. 15223 SE128th (1/2) Renton 98059* yes Uitdeflesch Mary 16817 SE128th Renton 98059* yes Uitdefiesch Henry 16817 SE128th Renton 98059* yes Uitdefiesch Lois 16817 SE128th Renton 98059* yes O' Wilson Wallace R. 17212 SE128th St Renton 98059* yes Wilson Inez M. 17212 SE128th Renton 98059* yes Parrott Eleanor 17229 SE128th St Renton 98059* yes Hampshire Linda 13625 SE131st Renton 98059* yes Hampshire Michael 13625 SE131st Renton 98059* yes Miller Chuck 16025 SE131st Renton 98059* yes Miller Kim 16025 SE131st St Renton 98059* yes Still Larry D. 19102 SE133rd P1 Renton 98059* yes Still Mary A. 19102 SE133rd P1 Renton 98059* yes Daniels J. Jerome 19110 SE133rd P1 Renton 98059* yes Murray Susan L. 19110 SE133rd P1 Renton 98059* yes Vossler Gary 14118 SE135th St Renton 98059* yes Post David 18227 SE135th Renton 98059* yes Post Laurie L. 18227 SE135th Renton 98059* yes Wehmeyer Suzanne E. 17814 SE136TH Renton 98059* yes Kaseburg Kathryn A. 14515 SE139th P1 Renton 98059* yes Kaseberg Scott 14515 SE139th P1 Renton 98059* yes Anthony Gary S. 11819 SE141st Renton 98059* yes EXHIBIT 8 SIGNERS BY ZIP & ST. ADDRESS, ADDED ZIPs (*3 PER THOMAS GUIDE 92 ED 02-20-1992 Page 13 LAST NAME 1st NAME ST. ADDRESS CITY ZIP KC Babcock Phoda A. 13445 SE141st St Renton 98059* yes Babcock David E. 13445 SE141st Renton 98059* yes Christensen Wallace M. 13725 SE141ST Renton 98059* yes Covey Patti 13821 SE14ist Renton 98059* yes Christensen Ruby 13723 SE141th St Renton 98059* yes Schiller Peg 14011 SE142nd St Renton 98059* yes Wentworth Lucille 17119 SE142nd St Renton 98059* yes Norman Monica 19825 SE142nd St Renton 98059 yes Norman Claudia 19825 SE142nd Renton 98059* yes Alford Crag 18452 SE143rd St Renton 98059* yes Alford Mary R. 18452 SE143rd St Renton 98059* yes Koppes Cindy 15425 SE144th P1 Renton 98059* yes Erickson Kareh H. 16631 SE144th Renton 98059* yes Bang Teri 14709 SE145th PI Renton 98059* yes Bang Brian 14709 SE145th P1 Renton 98059* yes Strohschein Julie 14714 SE145th P1 Renton 98059* yes �� Strohschein Don 14715 SE145th P1 Renton 98059* yes Yorozu Jeanne & Ken 14807 SE145th P1 Renton 98059* yes Buckett Ralph W. 16524 SE145th St Renton 98059* yes Ir) Bastjancie Nancy Bell 16110 SE146th P1 Renton 98059* yes Weber James A. 16136 SE146th PI Renton 98059* yes Schulte Edward A. 16152 SE146th P1 Renton 98059* yes' Caldwell Virginia 15561 SE148th St Renton 96059* yes Hogan Marilyn L. 15631 SE148th St Renton 98059* yes Hogan Lawrence M. 15631 SE148th Renton 98059* yes Lucas Richard 16420 SE149th Renton 98059* yes Gough Steve 16939 SE149th St Renton 98059* yes Gough Paula 16939 SE149th Renton 98059* yes Gough Steve 16939 SE149th Renton 98059* yes Webster Roger J. 19640 SE150th St Renton 98059* yes Webster Nadine K. 19640 SE150th Renton 98059* yes Amandus Laura 20560 SE159th Renton 98059* yes Anandus Lauri 20560 SE159th St Renton 98059* yes Hoyt Art 16202 SE183rd Renton 98059* yes Myron Donald L. 13026 SE184th PI Renton 98059* yes Magee Jerry 4103 SE3rd PL Renton 98059* Morris Brian 4329 SE3rd St Renton 98059* Morris Cindy 4329 SE3rd St Renton 98059* Bones Constance K. 13261 SE91st Renton 98059* yes ("-I Jones Paul D. 115 Union Ave NE #3 Renton 98059* Jones Vicki 115 Union Ave NE #3 Renton 98059* Kovacevick George M, 201 Union Ave SE #167 Renton 98059* Kovacevick Ethel 201 Union Ave SE #167 Renton 98059* Curtin Frederick A. 201 Union Ave SE Renton 98059* Curtin Ruth E. 201 Union Ave SE #209 Renton 96059* Bennett Denee A. 236 Union Ave NE Renton 98059 Clark Sylvia J. 375 Union Ave SE #119 Renton 98059* Stowell Cheryl 1150 Union Ave NE 15-7 Renton 98059* Stephens Pamela D. 1150 Union Ave NE Renton 98059* EXHIBIT 8 SIGNERS BY ZIP & ST. ADDRESS, ADDED ZIPs E*] PER THOMAS GUIDE 92 ED 02-20-1992 Pape 14 LAST NAME 1st NAME ST. ADDRESS CITY ZIP KC Schuh Kenneth 75 Vashon Ave SE Renton 98059* Schuh Deanna L. 115 Vashon Ave SE Renton 98059* Brock Ralph 208 Vashon Ave SE Renton 98059* �l Brock Ralph F. 208 Vashon Ave SE Renton 98059* �- Camerer Sue 2301 Vashon Ave NE Renton 98059* Camerer John 2301 Vashon Ave NE Renton 98059* Weelderyer Deohen 14106 W Lake Kathleen Dr Renton 98059* yes Weeldreyer Phillip H. 14106 W Lake Kathleen Dr Renton 98059* yes Ralston R.W. 14221 W Lake Kathleen Dr Renton 98059* yes Ralston Jeannette 14221 W Lake Kathleen Dr Renton 98059* yes Boone Lori 176 Whitman Ct NE Renton 98059* f Zinsnerrnan Erich J. 8836 Midvale Ave N. Seattle 98103* r McSherry Jr William 4515 21st NE Seattle 98105* Strayer Michelle 1011 NE Campus Pk Way Seattle 98105 Uh Janet Y. 1011 NE Campus Pk Wy Seattle 98105 -'-47 Arther Joel W. 1011 NE Campus Pk Wy Seattle 98105 • McNieol Jonathan M. 1101 NE Campus Park Way Seattle 98105 Elenzan Orlando B. 9331 56th Ave S Seattle 98118 --- Moore Frank 2100 N106th St 11206 Seattle 98133 Williams Kenneth C. 5258 Erskine Way SW Seattle 98136* 1 -1. Williams Barbara 5258 Erskine Way SW Seattle 98136* 1 McAleer Cynthia 220 SW132nd St Seattle 98146* /"' Norton Cliff 18219 3rd Pi SW Seattle 98166* Hazeltine Bradley P 0 Box 66777 Burien 98166* _kk JC Norman Harriett C. 432 SW143rd Seattle 98166 Norman Maynard G. 432 SW143rd Seattle 98166 VonJouanne iris A. 12811 3rd Ave S Seattle 98168 Arthur Dewey 13745 56th Ave S 0109 Seattle 98168 / Gaffney Marti 2439 S146th Sea-Tao 98168 A-5 Gaffney Paul 2439 S146th St Seattle 98168* Gaffney Sam 2439 S146th Sea-Tao 98168 r Bullock Russell 8716 117 PI Seattle 98178* McKinney Norma 11133 51st St Seattle 98178* Chapman Jane 10818 56th Ave S Seattle 98178* Wilson Kathy L. 12011 75th Ave S Seattle 98178* Blake Lenda T. 12027 75th Ave S Seattle 98178 Blake Richard D. 12027 75th Ave S Seattle 98178 !� Paul Gail 12003 85th Ave SE Seattle 98178* -A./ / v -L2 Paul Ronald R. 12003 85th Ave S Seattle 98178* Papini Dino 12270 Beacon Ave S Seattle 98178* 106'Ic Donaldson Elaine 10828 Forest Ave S Seattle 98178* Chapman Dusre 5349 S Creston Seattle 98178 Chapman Marguerite 5349 S Crestton St Seattle 98178* Alexander Nancy 8439 S112nd Seattle 98178* Alexander A.E. 8439 6112th Seattle 98178* Alexander Ed 8439 S112th Seattle 98178 Bullock Esperanza 8716 6117th P1 Seattle 98178 Wentworth Steven R. 7027 S125th St. Seattle 98178* + Waler L.T. 8500 S125th Seattle 98178 J EXHIBIT 8 SIGNERS BY ZIP & ST. ADDRESS, ADDED ZIPs 1*7 PER THOMAS GUIDE 92 ED 02-20-1992 Pape 15 LAST NAME 1st NAME ST. ADDRESS CITY ZIP KC Will Mildred V. 6030 5127th P1 Seattle 98176* Will Hugh M. 6030 5127th P1 Seattle 98178* 4. Roy Jean 7454 S127th St Seattle 98178 Carriegan Kym 7206 5128th Seattle 98178* Burlile Sustina 16230 34th Ave S Sea-Tac 98188*\ Burtile Connie S. 16230 34th Ave S Sea-Tac 98186* Buchle John 0. 162330 34th Ave S Sea-Tac 98188* Angove Bobbi 17939 51st S Sea-Tac 98186 Sundblab Larry L. 18017 Military Rd S Sea-Tac 98188* 4 ti IC) Sundblad Collean 18017 Military Rd S Sea-Tac 98188 Enrico Alma 5575 5152nd #77 Tukuiia 98188* Kelly John C. 6249 S153rd St Tukwira 98188* Halfhill D. Kevin 4335 S181st Sea-Tac 98188 Halphill Susan 4335 6181st St Sea-Tac 98186 Wright Elizabeth J. 22660 24th Ave S Des Moines 98i98 _ Colyn Elarine 903 S208th Seattle 98198 Colyn Dick 903 5208th Seattle 98198 ,,, Hendrickson Toni 600 E. Maple #3 Bellingham 98225 I Overmars Bob 2720 132nd Ave SE Snohomish 98290 Z Overmars Lisa 2720 132nd Ave SE Snohomish 98290 Fleming Troy 2020 E Pioneer Puyallup 98372* 1 Foster Ruth A. 210 346th St S Roy 98558 Akesson Brian 360 W Main Pullman 99163* — 1 Baid Neal NO ADDRESS GIVEN NOT GIVEN NOFIND 1 L Amandus James A. 1254 NW Beca NOT GIVEN NOFIND 1 TOTAL Printed 711 of the 711 records. �� �� _ ��7�'��l����r�/ ?�T*-) �� {��������� ]L �� �. __.- , � � , �� ,�»��-�� ~�.` � « V~ �^-�� � �� NEIGHBORHOOD PETITION SIGNERS VS CE�lr����� P�hPERTIE�S WI'THIl�-30� ��L� r �]F"°S��E 02-20-1992 Page 1 ST. ADDRESS LIS TAX ACC NO SIGNED ZONE YEAR 836 Jefferson Ave NE yes 807440-0215 CUP, RZR1 1958 839 Jefferson Ave NE yes 245720-01'DO R2 1958 842 Jefferson Ave NE yes 807440-0220 R1 1958 845 Jeffersoi-i Ave NE yes 245720-0105 R2 1958 830 Kirkland Ave NE yes 807440-0090 CUP, RZ R1 1958 833 Kirkland Ave NE yes 807440-0155 CUP, RZ R1 1958 836 Kirkland Ave NE yes 807440-0095 CUP, RZ R1 1958 839 Kirkland Ave NE yes 807440-0150 CUP, RZ R1 1958 844 Kirkland Ave NE yes 807440-0100 CUP, RZ R1 1958 850 Kirkland Ave NE yes 807440-0105 R1 1958 856 Kirkland Ave NE yes 807440-0110 R1 1958 900 Kirkland Ave NE yes 607440-0115 CUP, RZ R1 1958 904 Kirkland Ave NE yes 807440-0120 CUP, RZ R1 1958 908 Kirkland Ave NE yes 807440-0125 CUP, RZ R1 1958 912 Kirkland Ave NE yes 807440-0130 CUP, RZ R1 1958 926 Kirkland Ave NE yes 807440-0140 R1 1958 851 Lynnwood Ave NE yes 807440-0035 CUP, RZ R1 1958 905 Lynnwood Ave NE yes 807440-0030 CUP, RZ R1 1958 911 Lynnwood Ave NE yes 807440-0025 CUP, RZ R1 1958 917 Lynntkiood Ave NE yes 807440-0020 CUP, RZ R1 1958 ' 923 Lynnwood Ave NE yes 807440-0015 CUP, RZ R1 1958 929 Lynriwood Ave NE yes 807440-0010 CUP, RZ R1 1958 3112 NE10th St yes 285480-0205 CUP, RZ R1 1958 3009 NE9th St yes 807440-0225 CUP, RZ R1 1958 3011 NE9th St yes 807440-0145 CUP, RZ R1 1958 820 Index Court NE yes 245720-0070 CUP, RZ R2 1959 833 Index Court NE yes 245720-0025 CUP, RZ R2 1959 837 Index Court NE yes 245720-0030 CUP, RZ R2 1959 845 Index Court NE yes 245720-0045 CUP, RZ R2 1959 851 Jefferson Ave NE yes 245720-0110 R2 1959 857 Jefferson Ave NE yes 245720-0115 R2 1959 920 Kirkland Ave NE yes 807440-0135 R1 1959 845 Lynnwood Ave NE yes 807440-0040 CUP, RZ R1 1959 951 Lynnwood Ave NE yes 607440-0005 , RZ R1 1959 2809 NE Sunset Blvd yes 722790-0091 B1 1959 850 Harrington Ave NE yes 245720-0197 R2 1960 856 Harrington Ave NE yes 245720-0196 R2 1960 828 Index Court NE yes 245720-0060 R2 1960 2705 NE Sunset Blvd yes 722780-1025 B1 1960 3031 NE10th St yes 722780-0995 . R1 1960 824 Index Court NE yes 245720-0065 CUP, RZ R2 1961 829 Index Court NE yes 245720-0020 R2 1961 832 Index, Court NE yes 245720-0055 R2 1961 840 Index' Court NE yes 245720-0045 CUP, RZ R2 1961 841 Index Court NE yes 245720-0105 R2 1961 835 Lynnwood Ave NE yes 807440-0045 CUP, RZ R1 1961 2804 NE10th St yes 722790-0093 B1 1961 825 Index Court NE yes 245720-0015 R2 1962 836 Index Court NE yes 245720-0050 R2 1962 | | ����� ��T �*� _ . . NEIGHBORHOOD PETITION SIGNERS VS CERT LIST PROPERTIES WITHIN 300 FEET OF SITE 02-20-1992 Page 2 ST. ADDRESS LIS TAX ACC NO SIGNED ZONE YEAR 2725 NE Sunset Blvd yes 722780-1026 B1 1964 3104 NE10th St yes 285480-0200 R1 1964 925 Harrington Ave NE yes 722750-0620 B1 1965 3030 NE10th St yes 008900-0090 R3 1967 2801 NE Sunset Blvd yes 722790 0090 B1 1971 900 Harrington Ave NE yes 722780-1028 B1 1973 2901 NE10th St yes 722780-1027 B1 1976 1013 Kirkland Ave NE yes 008900-0140 R3 1977 9__ Harrington Ave NE yes 722750-0635 B1 1980 1000 Index Ave NE yes 722790-0075 B1 1982 935 Harrington Ave NE yes 722750-0625 B1 1984 Behind Taco Belle yes 722750-0630 B1 LAND Adjacent Employment Sec. yes 008900-0050 B1 LAND Church B-1 lot yes 722780-0040 B1 LAND Next to boat works yes 722780 1024 B1 LAND ` TOTAL ______________ _ Printed 64 of the 135 records. - i. \-1-„— ..-,-.917.7. -;)___{,,-; .: , . " . i ,. 1 1,1:<4 _ ..Li i4e---" r--- G.1 41 • ' e,A , II, ., :: 1 1 r , ......-1; /•'/l n 1 I .N• r , .„1,11.1.1 .. , i. . ..._ L-s--_.,_ ; - __ 4\ , g , 1: �T'- t ,1 .. 'I' i . • .-A,.. I i--a' I1s' p� or,mrie-, s_,,lx-'dyed -'o �c,-2 t 62 i r • l • ii. _id , :1-.7V.:-_-.1 Oaf' r,.//y1J(l S0 41-6,pdGyvs `I 0/1-tr J/. 1 G1V p ( •0'1 fii J 1 ,1 Z+,g)0 ,, (r O i._. ti . 1(101i) / IS-4/1 14,d ovd 0 1c>1-1 CA cool -trun ,.i ' - .I+ 1. AS sZ�,n�1S ( o1 , 11�� (41 1►91 HY--z1 .� v' _.1 �S Nd:VJ Jl ' -,f- - - - 11:.-.. 1 -/t_j---=.- . _\ - i 't 6 . .4-r - t .r . _ ._ .. e1 ,. /J 1.i1 lti •• pa 1 ,..-4.-....: •—k- \ k ___ lilt . 7t Z , 1 .• 1 . 1.• , Z t 'r .1 '�- / a �t . -' tt ,, ` tit/ ` W C l 1, e. 'I .� II •1S 1 , ,,. \\ _• , ` L . 1 , D r 1 rn , � , C v r-- �. 1 III"'r. :,' +l , rF LL.� , . e..! ft -r Z :; . 3 I' j I' rr't\ \‘' 1 i •..... S • L` \ is I r et. o' ,`h, I j j , —�• \ 1 i 1, 1 _c,, , - ;6 ;)O 1 ..4 ,,-.f , \ .\ , I 1 s �: a' q I ti. ,\ L-- ..1 r L ;TT. . I . I , 1 ' `—d , cis !ith. [-;-- \+,t oi4..j 1 9c '‘, .__ , \,. 4,...1, . , -.Ck.- ' • 1 . ''I - l 3 N I TT I t _' 7 J' (- f PQV ), .-t Ie 1, i `` 31 24 I Ie, •/ `L ...8 . �, yor `' f ' ` � 'a 1 1 C ►1Jt •1 , f V 1 I C111V / v'-' A,t. O1 +'+ + N C.El i7 a j^ c t., _ h /? \ 'A '_ 4 ct • I1 . t 1 JJJ _ l S7 r �� 1 S . Z. j " �, / 'oc� I 11,- MIMI d. 3 , ,I. „ I j r Asive;t11, 6 . :de , / if , . i 4/Al I 0.1- • ' . or vii Headl � r�e --ar.--— aill1=1=:& Vol. 3 No. 11 • February 1992 palsen bald uoitoanoo On Target MyPersonal ssaJppy ci, Jo,sed Jo!uaS`snpuewy w!r Testimony L9Lb-99Z(90Z) - — 99086 Uol6UIySBM`Uoluaa . ;. taaal ylue isee too LCOC Do you like to travel? I love to go =� S 1 4 NSA' %f VM'uotuaa on drives. I find cross-count travelin fan- , OL ON WaledrY g a uvd � �, cinating. I remember one of my trips Ala.dk Allihk__, ;, „ ,, , 39V1SOd•S•n through Oregon. It was in the evening. •u6J0 moJd-uoN Cars had their lights on. About two I undred yards ahead, my headlights lit up the reflectors of something on the But, you can recognize them. Like a well by Maureen Au r shoulder of I-5. paved-road, free of bumps and ruts, these PASTORAL STAFF As Igot closer, I could see that it people express it in their character. These P P P If you asked my mother if I was a JIM AMANDUS SENIOR PASTOR as an orange construction sign. The are people who show love and joy, peace BILL HERMAN WORSHIP/MUSIC g P P shy child, she's probably laugh. I admit I CHRIS RENZELMAN STUDENTS/SINGLES sign read: "END CONSTRUCTION." and patience. These are people who are was neither quiet nor inhibited. I did just MIKE SMITH MISSIONS/EVANGELISM FEBRUARY 1992 laughed out loud and I thought to saying, "Yes," to the HolySpirit who is at BOB STEVENS CHAPLAINCY g g Y 83 about anything for attention. More than FINANCES SUNDAY MONDAY TUESDAY WEDNESDAY THURSDAY FRIDAY SATURDAY myself, "I didn't see any road construe- work within them. that, I feared disapproval and rejection. I JERRY STELMA TREASURER 1 ion over any of the road I just crossed!" As you read this, maybe you would even thought I had to get God's attention JO 00 Woe Brunch NONI BAIN FINANCIAL SECRETARY •s often times happens, a sign is left say, "Jim,I'm not one of those people! I'm somehow and earn His approval. Yet I SUNDAY SCHEDULE I ong after the road crews have moved on. under construction RIGHT NOW!" Is that knew that I'd done things that were wrong MORNINGH PORSHTIME P 8:00,9:15&11.00 o 00 I e sign reminds motorist where the how you feel? Let me encourage you. You and my guilt condemned me. I didn't know FELSUNDAY SCHOOL 9:15&11:00 onstruction area had been,and the good are not alone. Join the heap! that God wanted me to know Him in a close, EVENING SERVICE 6:30 z 3 a 5 6 g ob that was done. But, with the encouragement, let 8 SO,9 15&1 I.00 9.30 JOY Exercise 9 30 Mary's Morning 4.00 Teen Bell Choir 8:45 MOPSgemen me personal way. DURING THE WEEK 9 15 @ Services 6 45 IV AWANA 700 Ensemble 5 30 Childrcn's Bell Choir 9:30 JOY Exercise Some Christians are like that. God give you some pastoral direction. Plug into I1:00 00 HSMuWayNn zoo Bell ennr 600 Orchestra 10.30 JOY Work Day He showed me through friends Sunday Bible School Live 6.45 AWANA 6:30 Basketball League MUSIC AND DRAMA MINISTRY 6.30 I as taken them through a time of spin- the ministries that will help you through Prayer @ Praise who had a real relationship with Him that W°Mp Servce CHILDREN AND TEEN PROGRAMS •1 re-construction. In fact, Highlands your growth. If you ou have never taken SINGLES FELLOWSHIP 9 1D 11 12 13 14 15 He had come near when He sent Christ to AWANA 8 00.9 15 @ 1100 9:30 10Y Exercise 9 30 Mary's Mumma 4 00 Teen Bell Choir 9 30 JOY Exercise 7.00 JH Valentine's Party s loaded with them. You can meet one Discovery Class,then make that a priority. WaMip service. 6 45 JV AWANA 7 00 Ensemble 5:30 Chddren's Bell Chou 10.30 JOY Luncheon earth. Yes, there was guilt, but it was HOME CARE CIRCLES MEETING IN HOMES 9 15&11 00 7 00 Hoyt Support Team 7 00 Bell Chair 6 00 orchestra 6 30 Friendship Circle 0 f these divine construction projects on PlugintoHomeCARE Circle. Ifyou have SENIOR CITIZENS ACTIVITIES Sunday Bible School 7 00 HS campus Care 6.45 AWANA 6.30 Basketbell League PJ a washed away when Christ died for my sins 6 30 om Luncheon 7:00 Pratte° &P"i.e 7.00 SON y given Sunday,just about anywhere special needs, contact Pastor Mike Smith g OFFICE HOURS Miss and I asked for for iveness. I couldn't earn WnMip 6erv,<e n the building. These are people who regarding the new Life Groups that have MONDAY-FRIDAY 8:00-5:00 P P g g P approval or salvation. It was offered to me SATURDAY 9'00-1:00 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 B 00,9.15&II 00 Prenden, Day-office 6:30 am Men's Outreach 4.00 Teen Bell Choir 8 45 MOPS 7.00 IN Bowling Night I ave allowed God to do His work in their been a great support to many. for free. Wonhip Services closed Breakfast 5.30 Children's Bell Chou 9.30 JOY Fsercue PHONE 9 158.1100 6 30 Mary's Mommg 6 CO Orchestra 10:30 JOY Bible Study ives. May the Lord bless you! Remember Over time,I'm seeing how God is Sunday Bible School 1 Dessert wl Ede NA H&HS Desse 6 45 AWANA 6.30 Basketball League CHURCH OFFICE 255-4751 6:30 Snow Day Parrott 7:00 SAM But, we can miss those people. that God is faithful to bring to completion WoMp Serv„` 7 00 Ensemble 7 00 Prayer&Praise changing my old insecurities into trust,and STUDENTS/SININFORMATION LINE255-2255 7.00 HS Gym Note 7:00 Bell Choir 7:00 Ede" od doesn't leave signs around people's what He has begunin you. my security blankets into strengths for His FAX 255-5460 23 MISSIONS 24 25 26 27 28 29 i ecks for others to see. He doesn't SUNDAY 9 30 JOY Exerciu 9 30 Mary's Morning 4 00 Teen Bell Cho" 9:30 JOY Exercise 7:00 JH Pump Up Nighs plan in my life. I only look forward to STAFF 8 00,9 15&11 00 6 45 IV AWANA 7 00 Ensemble 5.30 Childre.s Bell Choir 10.30 JOY Trip I roadcast, "HEY, I'M DONE WITH 1 knowing Him more intimately and serving Worship Services 7.00 HS Campus Care 7 00 Boll Choir 6.00 Orchestra 6:30 Friendship Circle 9.15@I1.00 Greepe 6.45 AWANA 630 Basketball League 'HASE 1 IN AMANDUS' LIFE! NONI BAIN Sunday.rule School 7:00 Choir zoo sAM JEFF JOHNSON O0re ion,1 Pudu-k 7 00 Prayer&PraiseHim more faithfully. OME AND LOOK!" There are no ).541 CATHY JOSS PATTY LADD `!, I eon markers or orange signs to let you VI— SANDI SLOBODEN EXHIBIT T T T1 N-r rf`' 3 I R ow that someone hasjust completed a Jim Amandus 6,1m MARLENE SPANN H 1 i^i I KIT ..�.+al_ P J MARY LOU TIGNER LLJJ L].11 11 11 17 - �� _ onstruction phase in his or her life. Senior Pastor ' ---:- �,f Care Circles r Junior High Retreat r �� by Randy Conrads Missions y by Kelly Johnson Our Care Circle's Christmas Christmas breads.Women's Retreat outreach project was to visit the Renton We stayed for a couple of hours Moments44\14t House,a half-way home for boys awaiting just talking and opening gifts. The boys Highlands Community Church is a church assignment to foster homes. There are up were very appreciative of the company. I with a heart for missions. Missions471t by Carol Roenicke around theworld and around ournei h- Our Junior Hi hers are excited to six boys at a time at the home. Typically felt that they'd have like it if we had stayed y g about their Winter Retreat at Camas Mead- YOUNG LADIES!! OLD LADIES!! they come from abusive families, are longer. At the end we gathered in the borhood. The Missions Committee wants /J ows. The theme for activities and teaching AGES-IN-BETWEEN-LADIES!! usually "developmentally disabled" and living room to offer a prayer for the boys to keep you informed of our growing \�\ missions ministry. The followingwill be unity and acceptance. is our You are warmly invited to attend are often in trouble. and say good-bye. The retreat will provide memories our 1992 HCC Women's Retreat! Mark I'll admit, not knowing what we Hugs were offered and accepted. Missions Strategy Statement, designed to keep us on the course our Lord has set that last a lifetime of innertubing,snowball you calendars now and start saving for a were going into was a little unnerving. But And to tell the truth,I think it was their idea fights, time with old and new friends, and wonderful time of fellowship,fun,growth I think that we'd all agree that this was one more than ours. for our part of reaching the world with cultural characteristics understand and ac- the Love of Christ. cept one another. Everyone belongs to such and, of course, food!i most importantly spiritual growth. of the most rewarding activities the group Jesus was there, and I'm glad I P ry g Departure from Highlands is at We will again be at beautiful Lake has had. We brought gifts, cookies, and was too. a group. only5"It is our desire to place an emphasis on A people group is considered "unreached" p.m. on Friday, March 6th. We will Retreat, 30-minutes from HCC. A return at approximately 6:00 p.m. on Sun- much sought after conference speaker, evangelizing and equipping an unreached if there is no established church which isda March 8th. Parents: Call the Student Barbara Feil of Multnomah School of the people group, using a team concept capable of communicating the gospel to the255-y Bible will be sharing on handling,learning whose purpose is to plant an evangeliz- rest of the group;therefore,Christians from Ministries Hot-line at non the for the from, and rejoicing through the different ing,culturally indigenous church in that another people group must cross the Ian- latest arrival information on the 8th. MISSIONS SUNDAY people group. " guage/cultural barrier to establish a church. The cost is $52.00 for those who stages of a woman's life. She writes, USING A TEAM CONCEPT...We are register by March 1, $57.00 later. A "Some days life is just too hard... and I February 23, 1992 $10.00 by March 1 will hold your place. long for heaven! No more sorrows, no IT IS OUR DESIRE TO PLACE AN committed to assessing the type and number more sin, no more pain and no more EMPHASIS... of people needed to reach a certain people The remainder is due by 5:00 p.m. on tears!" But she assures us that change is Special Guest Speakers: "Our desire" shows our true attitude; group and pray for and train those March 6. Scholarships are available for that we have direction but are open to eo le...develo io a team who can minis- their who are Higher, financially unable to send possible, there is joy this side of heaven, Don Parrott, missionary from Argentina P P P P g their Junior Higher, and there is a price and we can face another day. Please come Don Richardson, missionary and author of Peace Child God's sovereignty in changing that di- ter together,rather than sending someone to On Sunday morning,Jan Shafer, rection. The word "emphasis"was cho- one part of the world, and someone to reduction for those families with more than our missionary to the United Arab Emir- sen to show a priority on certain mis- another part, with no real connection in one child attending. ates, will be leading in worship and com- A special International Potluck at 5:30 p.m. sions ministries and at the same time to their ministries, and no one else there to For more information,contact our munion. This had become one of the Bring your favorite hot dish and a salad or dessert. allow for involvement with projects and work with them. The team may,or may not, Student Ministries department at 255-4751. highlights of our time together. people that do not fit the priority. all come from the same church. The dates are March 6-8 (Friday ON EVANGELIZING AND WHOSE PURPOSE IS TO PLANT AN Thank You evening through Sunday noon). Registra- EQUIPPING... EVANGELIZING, CULTURALLY IN- tion begins February 9 through March 1. Evangelize - communicating to people DIGENOUS CHURCH IN THAT We wish to take a moment and Cost is$52.00. the gospel of Jesus Christ so they may PEOPLE GROUP...The team's goal is to thank all of you who joined in prayer for our Reserve a spot now for yourself receive Him as Savior; and equip - to help those who become Christians to form a brother-in-law,Graham Gilliland,concern- and some friends. We promise a delight- - provide the teaching and encouragement church (an evangelizing church) that will ing his most recent fight with cancer. ful, relaxing and renewing time! Evergreen Place t` necessary to develop Christians who are continue to spread the Good News about Graham is so grateful for the capable of leading the new church. Jesus Christ. It is important that the church prayers of those in God's family who joined by Hugh&Kris McCormick UNREACHED PEOPLE GROUP... reflect the people's own culture where ap- in prayer one recent Sunday. Several around A people groupwho because of common us were in tears as Pastor Amandus prayed. Haveyou driven bythe new Ev- teachingthrough December and BeckyP P propriate (a culturally indigenous church) P Y e 1 g social, linguistic, ethnic, religious, and rather than the culture of the missionaries. Graham expressed it best,"They don't even 1992 Women's Retreat ergreen Place Retirement Apartments(off filling in as the organist. What a blessing! know me, and yet, some were moved to Sunset Blvd. across from the Colliery We wish them well in California as they tears as they prayed." He went on to marvel "Seasons in a Woman's Life" Restaurant) and wondered what it's like leave to work on the Jesus Film Project r 1 r 1 at the greatness of God's power to move featuring and who lives there? It is a beautifully with Campus Crusade. We will miss them. Mark your calendar among His family even for those we've Barbara Feil decorated apartment complex for able- One of the highlights of the year MOTHERS OF calendars... +++++++ never met. It lifted his spirit to know so iaali+lla of bodied senior citizens. was a mini-concert by a contingent of our +++++++ many were praying for him. Graham is a a++i�la Multnomah School of the Bible The ministry began last August KWAM(Kids With A Mission)kids. The tower of strength and faith, even through and with people from Highlands leading a 45 children sang songs and provided personal MVPSThe this time of continual complications and Jan Shafer minute Sundaymorningworshipservice testimonies. Nothinglights upa P R E S C H O O L E R S CONTINENTAL SINGERS P g set-backs. His prayer is that others will missionary to the including singing,usually favorite hymns, grandparent's day more than being with Meetings resume Thursdaymorn- are coming to Highlands Community come closer to God through his experience, United Arab Emirates teaching and special music. The service children even if not their own. gChurch, Sunday evening, March 15, ing, February 6th, at 8:45 in Fel- and that God will be glorified. has grown from 3 to 8 attendees, one a Ifyou would like to participate in at 6:30. Invite your friends and fam- P P lowship Hall. Call Leah Etter for Thank you all for your prayerful Come for inspiration, renewal, fun, retiredpastorwho graciouslydonatedh m- this ministryor would just like to spend ily for an evening of great Christian P y P more information. support in this time, crafts and fellowship. nals for our use. We were fortunate to some time with these wonderful people, music. ` 0 have had Jim Pryde leading most of the please let us know. I. 4 ` ♦ -John, Kim, and Christi Burshek EXHIBIT -t-,m n • Statement by aggrieved Neighbor Febuary 16 , 1992 To: The City of Renton: This statement is made of my own free will . It is my true testimony of the experiences with having my home in the vicinity of the Highlands Community Church . I understand that it is to be presented to support a neighbor's opposing position at the Public Hearing held on the application for a conditional use permit/rezone to expand the Highlands Community Church . The following Church attribute/s have adverse effects upon the enjoyment, comfort, convenience and value of my property. The Highlands Community Church claims to have ample parking in it' s parking lot. If this is true then why is it that when I go to visit or pick up my Mother-in-Law who lives across the street from the Church , I cannot find a parking spot on the street next to her apartment building or across the street. I always end up driving back to my home at 830 Kirkland ave. and walking up to get my Mother in Law and walking back to my house. When I look up the street, from my home, towards the church I see cars parked on the street in all direction from the church. Many Sundays the cars are parked clear down by my house. If the church claims ample parking, then why are these people forced to park on the streets and make it difficult for the people who live in this neighborhood . People cannot come to visit the people who live in the neighborhood because there is no where for them to park. If this is a community church , why are most of the cars parked here from out of the area. They claim that they have 700 names of people belonging to the Church. Where do they all live. Seattle, Burien , Bellview, Federial Way, and of course some from Renton . This is no longer a Community Church but a church with a large expansion budget: It has it' s sights set on : Buying all the property around it Getting the zoning laws changed to suit its purposes Expanding its already large building complex and they stated "making it into a Missionary School " This planning by the Church Officials does not fit the mold of a Community Church . If these expansion plans presented by the Highlands Community Church are allowed to go through , you will see another complex like the 7th Day Adventist Church in Auburn . Along with this come hostility of the surrounding neighborhood, increased traffic in an already congested area. We already have excessive traffic from the Unemployment Center, and the large amount of Bus traffic that roars through our streets., I implore you, the City Planning Council , to really consider what the implications of this proposed project would do this neighborhood. This Church is large enough NOW. It already causes intolerable congestion on Sundays and has events going on most nights of the week, late into the evening . THANK YOU Signature Adress 830 Kirkland Ave. N . E. Renton , Wash . Printed Name_ Richard R Goff PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER HIGHLANDS COMMUNITY CHURCH ADDIT February 4, 1992 Page 8 4. Compatibility: The proposed use shall be compatible with the residential scale and character of the neighborhood. (Ord 3599, 1-11-82) The proposed two-story 12,800 s.f. classroom addition will be attached to the west side of the existing structure. Due to the slope of the terrain in this area, the proposed structure will not be seen over the existing sanctuary and gymnasium when viewed from Kirkland Avenue. A portion of the proposed structure will extend south of the existing building and will be visible_from Kirkland Avenue. The portion of the proposed addition that would be visible from Kirkland Avenue would include a canopy over an existing walkway, the entrance/lobby area of the proposed addition (ground floor) and two offices (second floor). The proposed addition will be painted to match the existing building. The exterior walls of the building will be predominantly finished with stucco, with wood and brick in some areas. A wood fascia will accent the building walls. The main portion of the building will have a flat roof in order to reduce the visual impact of the building. This roof will be consistent with the roof of the adjacent gymnasium. The applicant is proposing to provide additional landscaping along the west side of the building and along the south boundary of the adjacent Golden Pines apartment property. Recently, the applicant has refurbished the existing landscaping around the perimeter of the project site by removing weeds and replacing dead plant materials. Some area residents have voiced the concern that the church complex is getting to large for this area and that is causing problems within the adjacent neighborhoods. Staff have addressed these problems by requiring the additional parking, a paved second entrance onto the subject property, and by requesting that the applicant work with its own congregation to resolve the conflicts with the neighbors. Staff believes that the proposed plan being reviewed under this conditional use permit meets those goals and is compatible with the adjacent residential areas. The proposed addition will not exceed a height of 25 feet, which is compatible with the other two-story buildings in the area. The exterior of the building will be finished in stucco, wood and brick which will match the existing church complex. These building materials will also be compatible with the structural materials used in the buildings within the adjacentproperties. __. 5. Parking: Parking under the building structure should be encouraged. Lot coverage may be increased to as much as seventy-five percent (75%) of the lot coverage requirement of the zone, in which the proposed use is located, if all parking is provided underground or within the structure. (Ord.3903, 4-22-85) Recently, the church, in accordance with City requirements, paved most of the gravel parking lot (shown as the westerly four rows of parking on the site plan). As the remainder of the gravel parking area is now needed to provide the required parking spaces for the church and to encourage church members to park off of the streets, the remainder of the gravel parking lot should be paved. The driveway which accesses 10th Street needs to be paved in order to provide additional ingress/egress for the parking lot and adequate parking for the proposed development. prelmrpt e_ ( , Jr CITY OF RENTON ® ,{ �;. Mayor Earl Clymer . . EXHIB •e • March 5, 1991 � �° o U/ Mr. Cornelius Gevers 900 Kirkland Avenue NE Renton, WA 98056 Dear Mr. Gevers: Per your request at the Renton City Council meeting of February 11, 1991, I asked the Police Department to monitor the area of the Highlands Community Church for traffic and parking problems in that area. Attached is a copy of a report I received from the Police Department. Chief Wallis has assured me that the police will continue to check the area. If you have any further questions or concerns, let us know. Sincerely, Earl Clymer Mayor ec\91-038/sw Attachment 200 Mill ,enue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2580 Renton Police Department MEMORANDUM DATE: February 20, 1991 TO: Mayor Earl Clymer FROM: Chief Alan Wallis , SUBJECT: Parking/Highlands Community Church As requested, I had officers check the area of the Highlands Community Church for parking violations on Thursday, February 14, 1991. The officer assigned issued eleven parking citations and warned people who were about to park illegally. They also talked with the church staff and found them to be willing to abide by the law and try to keep congregation members from parking in a manner that bothers the neighbors. I have attached a copy of the officer's report for your information. I would like to suggest the formation of a community committee composed of members of City staff, church members, and the neighborhood to work on the parking concerns in the area. It is my feeling that if we can form a partnership with the church and the community, we can find a long term solution to the parking problem that is beneficial to both the church and the community. I do not believe the total answer to the parking concerns in the area is enforcement. Captain Persson, of my staff, has agreed to work on such a committee if you decide to form one. I will have my officers continue to check the parking around the Highlands Community Church on Thursdays and Sundays. Chief Alan Wallis (SM/DRP1:141) MEMORANDUM To Lt. Gerber Date 02-14-91 From Cpl . Robbins Subject Highlands Community Church Ofc . Leibman and I checked on the parking problem in the area around the church and made the following observations : 1) That about 100 vehicles belonging to church goers were parked in the surrounding area . 2) That none of these vehicles were blocking driveways , although they were occassionally parked to either side of a driveway. 3) That about 300 to 400 vehicles were parked in the church' s parking lot. 4) That no vehicles were parked on Kirkland Ave NE, 900 block , on the east side of the road. 5) That only one or two vehicles were actually on the sidewalk, and then only over it a few inches . Ofc . Leibman learned the following from church staff : 1) That the large meetings are only for the month of February. Tonight was "Billy Graham night" . 2) That church staff advised members not to park on the east side of Kirkland Ave NE across from the church (900 Blk) , because of citizen complaints from persons living there . Ofc . Leibman and I took the following enforcement action : 1) Verbal warningsto persons parking illegally in our presence . All persons warned quickly moved or reparked their vehicles , and were polite and cooperative. 2) Issuance of 11 parking infractions, mostly to persons parked to near to intersections . 3) Request to church staff that they advise their congregation to abide by the law regarding the parking of their vehicles , and be cognizant that there is a problem because of the large number of members . ide ros emu: a /&-...1Q-, .�c�_ �,:-� • I„ _.:---- , /I, . /2i'/ 4t , � z-14- i 4 i r Missions Moments By M4r '.$t ;,er ens Retreat Missions Conference 1991 is over. Re- Coming the first weekend in May is the sixth member when Howie and JoAnn Brant attended ` ' r Highlands Community Church Men's Retreat. our Missions Conference a few years ago?Want This year's retreat will be held May 3-4 at Camp to visit with them?In lieu of a visit,Mike Smith l Glendawn in Auburn.The theme is Dare to Care: offered us a peek at the letter he received from � "The Art of Gentle Persuasion."You will enjoy the Brants several weeks ago. • 041 a day of challenging ministry as we take time away "Sounds good about your Missions Con i from our busy schedules to fellowship with other ference in March.. .This is a day when it seems men around the Lord Jesus Christ. that God has opened a door in that part(Eastern Outreach" is at the head of his list (Urban Dr.Joe Aldrich, noted author and president Europe)of the world. And when God opens a Outreach, Radio Ministries, Literature Coot of Multnomah School of the Bible,will be speak- door, I'm fully convinced that he wants us to dination, Outreach into New Areas and ing on and challenging us from his current book step through the open doors He puts in front Church/Mission Relations are the others. on evangelism, "The Art of Gentle Persuasion." of us. . .My daughter,Krista has applied to go When SIM pioneers ventured into Africa Joe is a godly man, gifted writer, and dynamic to Eastern Europe this summer. Our second almost 100 years ago they were interested in speaker. Don't miss this exciting opportunity to daughter is also hoping to go to Romania and reaching the Muslims of Africa's interior.. .In learn how to be better equipped to reach friends Hungary this summer so we are "right with God's providence,large churches developed in and neighbors for Christ. Come join other men you"in your concern for Eastern Europe. (Ed. both East and West Africa.. .well over 6000 who love God and be encouraged in your walk. comment:Can't you see God's hand in our mis- churches were started just south of the You can register beginning Sunday, April sions endeavor-we do have the mind of God in Sahara.. .This coming July I'll be bringing in 14th for the retreat on May 3-4. Dinner will be this area of our missions outreach!) about 15 or so of our best troops from all over served Friday at 7:00 with sessions and activities "Just this week we had two Ethiopian the world. We will be having a four-day con- following. Saturday's activities include ministry church leaders here with us in Charlotte. One sultation on Islam, trying to find the very best sessions,three square meals and the second annual of them reported that already this year, over ways to combat this false religion. Iron Man Decathalon. 10,000 people have been baptized in his church "We need prayer in this ministry. Islam Location: Camp Glendawn district!That isn't hype from inflated statistics. is hard. Huge people groups like the Wolof It is what God is doing in Ethiopia where we (2.5 million),the Mandingo(8 million),Kanuri Schedule: May 3, 6 p.m. - May 4, 8:00-7:00 had served for seven years. We also got good (4.5 million) Somali (7 million) and the Meals: Friday Dinner: 7:00 p.m. reports from the area of Ghana where JoAnn Magindinao(.9 million)have but a handful of Saturday - Breakfast, Lunch & Dinner and 1 served for five years. Several of the believers among them.Satan has totally blinded Cost: $40.00 churches which we started while we were there their minds and we are in true spiritual battle have not only grown themselves but have started against the force of darkness with these people. Bring: Bible, Bed Linen, Toliet Articles, other churches. Isn't it fun to start spiritual We need your prayers." Table Games, Snacks forest fires that go on long after you leave a We're marching orders,troops! Hup-two- place? We are thankful." three-four.. . Among Howie's responsibilities,"Muslim MOPS by Marian Collins,Director What a wonderful year we've had in MOPS! Walk Thru The Bible Seminars With an average attendance of 60 moms and 90 kids,MOPS fills the church rooms on the first and Travel 4,000 Years Through the Old thought possible! At Old Testament third Thursdays of the month. We've had great Testament In Two Unforgettable Evenings: the seminar you'll teaching from Marilyn Hogan, Donnetta Dunn, Walk thru the Bible's Old Testament seminar Walk Thru the events tti Jim Amandus, and others. takes you on an unforgettable journey that can of the Old Testament We've been encouraged in our marriages and show you invaluable insights into God's Word. in 77 easy-to-remem- ,. understand our family's personalities better. We :°=.- became more aware of battlefields and anger with Seminar dates: ber steps -- in less ••�;!,�,;;e;; Sunday, April 21, 6:30 - 9:00 p.m. than three minutes. ,":; �;^sue our toddlers,learned about sibiling rivalry,why Monday, April 22, 7:00 -9:30 p.m. You'll learn a memory kids misbehave and much more. At Christmas In six action-packed hours, you'll learn peg for each of the 17 �� time we had a grand cookie exchange and were more about the Bible than you have in years Old Testament hist- blessed by a music program with the Hermans. -- some say even a lifetime! Using hand orical books. Rekindle your desire to read, There has also been time for us to do some fun motions, catchy phrases, and other exciting study and apply the Old Testament to your crafts, learn a little about quilt-making and kids methods you'll learn vast amounts of Bible everyday life. Plan on attending now! Registra- parties,and get to know one another better in our knowledge--and have more fun than you ever tion forms are available at the church. small groups. MOPS has been a lot of fun and you can join us if you are expecting or have a baby, toddler Parking Provokes ober enchrough kindergarten age.Come, ousc ged and strengthened as a mom,a wife, and a woman. MOPS is also just the right place Perplexing Problems by Bob Stevens to bring that neighbor or friend you're reaching out to.Great MOPS meetings are still coming up. (But we solved them!) side of Kirkland Avenue at the present time. Because of spring break,April's meetings will be Highlands Community Church people We want to be considerate of our neighbors who on the 11th and the 18th. Register now! Phone thank you for your splendid cooperation con- live on that side of the street. Marian Collins at 228-7763 or Terri Rudy at cerning the vehicle parking during the Billy Those of you who attend the 11:00 A.M. 277-5122.Tapes of this year's speakers are avail- Graham training classes. We are sorry if any service, consider arriving about 10:50 A.M. able for$2.00(contact Terri).Look for more in- of you received"parking tickets."As you park, You're more likely to find available parking. formation soon about the MOPS sponsored special pay attention to the "30 feet from corner" Once again, we thank you and God bless dinner on April 26. Steve and Paula Gough will parking signs. Please do not park on the east- each of you and your family. be speaking on values and goal setting for parents. , ,,, . A . ... .. . City Editor 872f3721 Monday,FebruaryIl, 1991 valley'�h'�s Algona■Auburn•■Black Diamond•Covington•Enwnclaw■Faitwood•Kent•Maple Valley■Pacific•Renton•Tukwila ___ • Compiled by Valley Daily News staff writers Enumclaw to honor late city official I 0\_,i .1 Office building proposed ENUMCLAW - A proclamation in ation for his many years of service and Dec last week's se of failing it s lion,five of very interested in city government." F memory of former Enumclaw City Coon- dedication to civic duty." ALewis was one of three candidates for } RENT ON-A plan tobj build a the publices tallestr oilman John D. Martin will be read at Martin "demonstrated a keen interest six council members chose Ted Lewis to the council seat. building will be the subject of a hearing tonight's City/Council Council and thoughtful appreciation of city and fill the vacancy. The others were Dixie Hughes,ajunior E before a hearing examiner Tuesday at City Hall. 8 Y, meeting. Martin, ity who served on the council community business,"eand"was always Lewis,thevanc53, a 1989 Enumclaw City The school teacher,and Michael Sten- r The proposed wouldou Place North office and for nine years and was a mayoral candi- willing to give the extra effort to achieve Council candidate, has been an Enum- hart, who previously served on Enum- 1 retail sales building be more than 260,000 date in 1989,died Jan.25 after battling a what he perceived as good for the comma- claw resident for approximately six years. Enum- claw council and planning commission, i square feet and 133 feet- 10 stories-tall•It serious illness for several months. nity,"the proclamation states. He is district ranger for the U.S.Forest Blackburn said. would exceed the city's current height limits. In the proclamation, Mayor Keith He was dedicated to his family as well Service's White River Ranger District. The otTproSouct, planned for Way,calls Renton ix-level Blackburn and the City Council will as to public service,the mayor says in the Blackburn said Lewis has been a mem- The City Council will meet at 7:30 Center garageh Grady e fort oz-level declare Feb.21"John D.Martin Day"in document. bet of the Enumclaw Planning Commis- tonight at Enumclaw City Hall, 1339 ` parking ud and the pith. demolition of an Enumclaw,extending"the city's appreci- Martin resigned his council seat in sion for a little more than a year and"is Griffin Ave. y '\^\ ` existing building on the site. \ill, In a second phase,an additional 115,000- . _- _ i _ \ square-foot building would be added. v The meeting will begin at 9 a.m.in the City _ — ti Hall council chambers,200 Mill Ave.S. - '•� �I Design considered - .- ._ -_ . COVINGTON-If the center of this growing - .- community is going to be a major commercial - .._� -"- E- center,then it should be"active,""interest- . ing,"and have no traffic problems,say planners - - - + , L- working on an urban design plan. (�• As part of the Soos Creek Community Plan, • s.!t - ' h� consultants are preparing a separate plan for r y.. ``' Covington Center.Preliminary ideas will be pre- • f, �,. sented at a public meeting 7-9 p.m.Tuesday in (~.+ - he Kentwood High School library. ', The plan will establish development guide- • - s,t- _ _ lines ad recommed physical improvements for •tars; � � Prl -. I Covington's commercial center, including the 'ill► . ... .,,.�..• _.-us t ,,,,� �+ �+� addition of bicycle lanes,sidewalks and small C" .. �� 1- _ .__- • , parks. - t ,v1 „" r 1 The objectives include increasing pedestrian w+?i'i Y W 1,..a activity,improving the potential for future trap- ' • sit service, and alleviating traffic problems, f; _..-�^ according to King County planners. - + "We're trying to develop an identity for Coy- ,a vision for Covington,"said planner Sandra • Towne. a. �_ % Covington residents are divided over whether _.__• , '`t — they want their commercial center to grow at all; - but the proposed draft of a new land-use plan r calls for a large commercial ad multifamily housing area near Kent-Kangley and Highway Valley Defy Newn photo W GARY KISaEL IB. "We will not entertain any questions on land- policy during this meeting,"Towne said. Neighbors say traffic and parking around Highlands Community Church are already problems,even before church's propo expansion. "We want to limit it to urban design." dents meeting is not a public hearing,but their Church's traffic enough dents are encou�r�1padd�fU come and express their opinions,Town•fata. Neighbors: Police seek dogs N'llli,, imir aurulalh it new sari tsar} x«Ll hwch needs w be ap muse lu Km Countypolice want a lawgood dogs. ■yTINANILDING . neighlgoLhwd," acid Kip_ POnidie other nand,oftte oNd,dlti�'in►+1. g -VOIMAalyNewe man tf) bxsardor'1*lidsforthetti•rdt.atrit■[e'. S needs toan Tony Bunt said Ole deal.- y'a KA RENTON-Neighbors of a large and "The key point to understand is that we On Sunday mornings,traffic and park- members have to continue using their unit needs to lls several for the popular church in the Highlands area say want very much to be good neighbors.' ing are problems in the neighborhood,he chinrch the church largely.Built in 0d expanded e "Allexp animals selected for tec program can • hdayuaotyllfeader during wie they have o traffic on their oppose The church, rsh usually has more said. with only one handlT duogg their police on proposed morning,of vow to oppose a vicesce 1,o000 S members attending three set- "If nS try nd to back ooyour 'tive- hoods �sitchas the church is an handler Bunt said. The dogs live with the propu expansionib the facility. oal Sundays, 00ently submitted ed - way on Sunday morning,oyou can't get caster and his or her family. Last week,a neighbor of the Highlands proposal for■ 12,000-square-foot adds- .w6"he said.The church has activities alive place,"he said. "We cannot back wherepeople mi be athorbein Dogs should be either purebred German shep- Community Church gathered signatures tion to the church's approximately all week long and the problems will only away from our commitment to mg a herds or Labrador retrievers,possess good hunt- toIprotest the proposed expansion.City 18,000-square-toot Sunday school build- get worse with an expansion. place If the gathering. ing instincts,go ,good temperament. altoand s in rare forward nithe�petition is thel issues fbrouew and Kirkland ing.It is ted off Northeast AAvenue Northeast. Street it is,' he said,''but it's at the upper levee've been sble to tolerate it the ls would church moved, necessarilye of the pos positive forsult the preferr good health.Males I to 2 years old are weeks. The proposal includes a request to of my tolerance level,and they want to neighborhood, d,zo since commercial. a church's preferred. teaching peoplegov- during wishing to donate a dog to the pro- "I know the church lent the uphper lime rezone a portion of their approxitnateiy make it bigger.)object to that." property iss gram should call Officer Bill Frost at 2996 7328 its rbtolerance od fensaid 20-yearresrident Lloyd dentist property- 1-acre ubcf use. Public-use rom rlion rig about lthe issuis saide of people who are incon- ernment, t ove their neighbors, and children in a pattern f normal leavevena meshousa,e.o call after hours and a message. Hoshide. "There'sityt way we could ings,allows such uses asc government build- group te ofn their parking. iiissr drawn togetheren a ,rhe nti we're thetical to juvenile delinquency.that is stand more activity up there." ings,hospitals and schools. g P people can be a nuisence. "When you look at what is the purpose Fluseason arrivesA church leader en the churchwill do Williso a I, the at church hasy eventual said,"Tat needs correction,and we want to of the chuch,we're trying to create peo- 1Clall it can to fit into the neighborhood.o ldplans fhi e he is sanctuary. The flu has arrived,and mem are warned "1 don't think anybody would argue Hoshide said he is concerned abut the be responsible.There are certain reason- pie who will ultimately be what I consider not to treat potential viral illiumla in children that there is no potential impact on the proposed expansion and the rezoning, uhie concerns about quality of life that the to be good neighbors with aspirin,which can LARKS 1411,11 Syndrome. .1.. c...d._icis s Truants, Hadar,Department a v r'�-K. E Law Offices • HILLIS CLARK MARTIN & PETERSON • A Professional Service Corporation 500 Galland Building,1221 Second Avenue Seattle,Washington 98101-2925 (206)623-1745 Facsimile(206)623-7789 January 31, 1992 'Mr. Lawrence J. Warren Warren, Kellogg, Barber, Dean & Fontes 100 South Second Street P.O. Box 626 Renton, WA 98057 Re: Highlands Community Church Escrow Dear Mr. Warren: We represent Highlands Community Church in connection with its proposed Christian Education Center addition. As part of this proposal, we have placed into escrow certain documents regarding an easement and a lot line adjustment, with you and your firm as escrow holder. Due to a delay in delivery, however, the surveyor's map of the lot line adjustment was not included with the material that was delivered to you yesterday. That map accompanies this letter, and should be added to the escrow materials that you are presently holding. Thank you for your assistance in this matter. y trul yours, • ichael Davis-Hall cc (w/encl) : Mr. Mark Pywell, City of Renton Mr. Richard W. Ralston, Highlands Community Church 311521 (7 �X. _ GERALYN REINART, P.E. ETt+. - r . e_U . _- ,yc ,_ _ __,.. Senior Engineer David I. Hamlin & Associates 1319 Dexter Ave. N. Seattle, WA. 98109 EDUCATION Bachelor of Science Department of Civil Engineering Iowa State University, 1979 Master of Science Department of Civil Engineering _ University of Washington, 1984 REGISTRATION Professional Engineer, Civil Engineering State of Washington, License No. 232-01 22588 PROFESSIONAL Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) ASSOCIATION PROFESSIONAL . Traffic Engineer EXPERIENCE City of Kennewick 1979-81 Traffic Operations Engineer City of Bellevue 1982-86 Traffic and Transportation Engineer David I. Hamlin and Associates 1986-present EXPERIENCE Responsible for the startup and management of HIGHLIGHTS the neighborhood traffic control program for the City of Bellevue. Responsible for the research, development, and composition of the ordinance regulating the kinds and classes of traffic on certain streets within the City of Bellevue. Responsible for the operation of the Bellevue computerized traffic control signal system. Responsible for the design and operation of all traffic control devices for the City of Kennewick. Preparation of traffic impact analyses for numerous commercial, residential, and industrial developments. i -Ln_fl_EdErer3:141,ZOCX31G2--- traffic design transportation planning 1319 Dexter Avenue North Seattle,Washington 98109 (206)285-9035 Suite 270 FAX 285-6345 January 29, 1992 Hillis Clark Martin & Peterson 500 Galland Building 1221 Second Avenue Seattle, WA. 98101 ATTN: Michael Davis-Hall Subject: Highlands Community Church - Parking Survey Dear Michael: The purpose of this letter is to summarize the results of our parking survey conducted at the Highlands Community Church on Sunday, January 26, 1992 . The survey included an inventory of not only the church parking lot, but also along NE 10th Street between Kirkland Avenue and Index Avenue, along Kirkland Avenue between NE 9th Street and NE 10th Street, and along NE 9th Street between Kirkland Avenue and Jefferson Avenue. An inventory of these areas was conducted every 15 minutes starting at 8 :45 AM until 9: 30 AM, with another inventory at 11: 00 AM. These select time periods allowed us to capture the turnover and overlap in parking between the 8: 00 AM and 9 : 15 AM services and again at the 11: 00 AM service. We have divided the church parking lot into three separate areas to better define the parking accumulation. These areas include the paved lot on the north side of the church, the existing gravel lot, and the paved lot on the south side of the church. The table on the following page summarizes the results of our survey for what we understand to be a typical or average Sunday church attendance: 1 of 3 Vehicle Inventory (Cars Parked) Time Period Location 8:45 9:00 9:15 9:30 11: 00 Church lot - 30 52 53 52 56 north side Church lot . - 39 100 184 198 175 south side Church lot - 3 4 48 48 47 gravel area NE 10th Street - 1 6 13 13 11 north side NE 10th Street - 0 9 13 13 14 south side Kirkland Avenue - 0 0 0 0 2 east side Kirkland Avenue - 6 12 15 15 16 west side NE 9th Street - 0 0 2 3 3 north side NE 9th Street - 0 0 0 0 0 south side As you can see from the table, the parking demand is at. its highest for the 9 : 15 service. Approximately 10 to 20 spaces in the gravel and south parking lots remained empty in this time period. Little to no parking activity was noted between 9: 30 and 10: 30 AM. About a half dozen cars trickled into the lot between 10: 30 and 10:45, just prior to the church members leaving from the 9: 15 service. These additional vehicles were accommodated in the outlying areas of the south and gravel parking lots. We did not observe any safety or capacity problems as the church members arrived and departed from the area. Traffic volumes on the adjacent streets were very light and the arrivals and departures of the church members were quite random, likely the result of various scheduled activities both before and after the service(s) . 2 of 3 H We understand that there have been complaints from adjacent residents with respect to the on-street parking, specifically along Kirkland Avenue, during church services. We also understand that the church has tried to encourage members not to park along the east side of Kirkland Avenue, and to always park legally no matter what the location. Our observations did not indicate any problems with the on- street parking during the period when the survey was conducted. We did note that the east side of Kirkland Avenue -does not have any curb and gutter installed between the street and the sidewalk. This lack of a physical "barrier" may result in motorists parking on part of the sidewalk, thus partially blocking pedestrian access. Complaints from the residents in this area may have been the result from this type of improper parking. As noted in the survey, church members tended to be avoiding parking on the east side of Kirkland Avenue. If parking on the east side of Kirkland Avenue is, and continues to be a problem, a potential solution would be to restrict parking on Sunday mornings. This type of restriction does, of course, require police enforcement and also would restrict the residents from parking along the street. Perhaps a better approach would be the continued encouragement of the church members to avoid parking on the street whenever possible. Overall, the majority of the church parking is being accommodated within the church lots and no significant safety or operational problems were noted. We trust that the above information will be helpful to you in your representation of the church's expansion. Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact our office. Sincerely, Geri Reinart, P.E. David I. Hamlin and Associates 3 of 3 , / I EXHIBIT 1 4 N .':':PY:i:kNr'@i 1 6-oW FO ;''' 1-P 7.‘ii- y �d ,} V .4 • • • • • • • • • • • • • I6OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOODUUUUUI 000000000000000000000000000 O0000000 OOOOOO OO O O OOOOOOOOOO O OO 0C 700000000000000000000000000 [$:$:y$;};:};{{:::;::$;:•:i{:}::: ,000000.0.0.0 OOO 0 Oo 0 0 O 00 O O O OOOOOOOC 00000000000000000000000000000000000 00 0 C •••' 000000OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO ' _00000OOOOOOOOOOOOOOO0000000c 100000000000000000000000000 �0000000000000000000000000c �000000000000OOOOOO00000aoo OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO00000c O0000 0Ooo 000000 0 00 0 0000000000 i o0 0 0000000000°OOOO°O0000°O0000°000 ••• •• 000000OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO00000C "" p n n nn n,,nnnnnnnn.t • 1. i • City C y of Renton 1.1 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 1 t i '•n „W S,{r r1r•t O aCsr;•t0.:Sli `�'AN'0"P.'t ' ,r Cf "8�, i C...C!C1'il• • n ....7 ..........i' ."<,c! c•c',...!,) �� ;�ont, Occ'cvn,Oc • -77.S.S.S............. - , .:' om C ends um p Marc h h 19 86 6 EA.\ . (26) 4. Year-round utilization of school facilities by the entire community for education and recreational activities should be encouraged. G. HEALTH CARE FACILI TIES OBJECTIVE: Adequate health care and social services should be available. POLICIES: I t i 1. Hospitals should be located and designed to serve the residents efficiently. . 2. Health care and social services should be coordinated with other agencies. Ili 3. A viable emergency health service should be maintained. 1 4. Day care facilities should be available. —11 H. CHURCHES OBJECTIVE: Churches and other places of worship should be well designed, constructed, and maintained and located to provide suitable access and minimize intrusion into residential areas. POLICIES: TI 1. Churches should be located on arterial streets. 2. Churches located in residential areas should be designed with 1,, adequate setbacks, landscaping and other buffers. 3. Churches` located in residential areas should be of a size and I intensity similar to the adjoining residential use. 4. Sufficient access, circulation, walkways, and off-street parking and loading should be provided by churches. X. GOVERNMENTAL GOAL: TO ENCOURAGE COST EFFECTIVE GOVERNMENTAL PROGRAMS THROUGH COOPERATIVE EFFORTS OF PUBLIC AGENCIES. As A. GOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION OBJECTIVE: Cooperation among i governments should be encouraged. POLICIES: i. Duplication of services and facilities among the various governments should be discouraged. 2. Joint use of facilities should be encouraged where practicable. 3. Assumption of special taxing districts should be encouraged, when it would be in the best interest of both the City and the residents of the district. / - EX! _1 MIT NO / 2- 4 a A C •&+ `>•:la.1 L.,t,,n , . REVISED AND COMPILED \ ORDINANCES of the CITY OF RENTON WASHINGTON 1989 • .(-#.- -=...-... -,_-_-_. $0 STERLING CODIFIERS. Inc. 35 West Commercial Weiser, Idaho i / 4-8-14 4-8-15 • B) Examiner may be extended for not more than the applicant such conditions, modifications thirty (30) days after the conclusion of the and restrictions. as the Examiner finds hearing if the Examiner finds that the necessary to make the application compatible amount and nature of the evidence to he con- with its environment and carry out the sidered, or receipt of additional information objectives and goals of the Comprehensive which cannot be made available within the Plan, the zoning ordinance, the subdivision normal decision period, requires the extension. ordinance, the codes and ordinances of the Notice of the extension, stating the reasons City of Renton, and the approved preliminary therefor, shall be forwarded to all parties of plat, if applicable. Conditions, modifications record in the manner set forth in this Section and restrictions which may be imposed are, for notification of the Examiner's decision.. but are not limited to, additional set backs, screenings in the form of landscaping and C. Change of Zone Classification (Rezone): fencing, covenants, easements and dedications of additional road rights'of way. Performance 1. In any case where a change of the zone bonds may be required to insure compliance classification of property is recommended, at with the conditions, modifications and least one of the following•circumstances shall restrictions. be found to apply: E. Termination of Decision: The City declares a. That substantial evidence was pre- that circumstances surrounding land use sented demonstrating the subject reclassi- decisions change rapidly over a period of time. fication appears not to have been specifically In order to assure the compatibility of a considered at the time of the last area land decision with current needs and concerns, any use analysis and area zoning; or such decision must be limited in duration, unless the action or improvements authorized b. That the property is potentially by the decision is implemented promptly. Any classified for the proposed zone being request- application or permit approved pursuant to ed pursuant to the polices set forth in the this Chapter with the exception of rezones Comprehensive Plan and conditions have been shall be implemented within two (2) years of met which would indicate the change is such approval unless other time limits are appropriate; or prescribed elsewhere in the Renton Municipal Code. Any application or permit which is not c. That since the last previous land use so implemented shall terminate the conclusion analysis of the area zoning of the subject of that period of time and become null and property, authorized public improvements, per- void. The Examiner may grant one extension mitted private development or other circum- of time for a maximum of one year for good stances affecting the subject property have cause shown. The burden of justification shall undergone significant and material change. rest with the applicant. For large scale or phased development projects, the Examiner • 2. If the Hearing Examiner further deter- may at the time of approval or recommend- mines that the change of the zone classifi- ation set forth time limits for expiration cation is advisable, in the public interest, which exceed those prescribed in this Section tends to further the preservation and enjoy- for such extended time limits as are justified ment of any substantial property rights of the by the record of the action. petitioner, is not materially detrimental to the public welfare or the properties of other . persons located in the vicinity thereof, and is 4-8-15: RECONSIDERATION: Any interested in harmony with the purposes and effect of person feeling that the decision of the the Comprehensive Plan, then in such event, Examiner is based on an erroneous procedure, the Hearing Examiner may recommend that errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the the City Council approve the change of the discovery of new evidence which could not be zone classification. reasonably available at the prior hearing, may make a written application for review by the , D. Conditions: The Examiner's recommendation Examiner within fourteen (14) days after the or decision may be to grant or deny the written decision of the Examiner has been application, or the Examiner may require of rendered. The application shall set forth the .% ` 4-31-35 4-31-36 D3) b. Agriculture; 4-31-36: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT: c. Residential open spaces; A. Purpose: The purpose of a conditional use permit is to allow certain uses in districts d. Recreational activities and facilities; from which they are normally prohibited by this Chapter when the proposed uses are e. Parking associated with adjoining land deemed consistent with other existing and uses — provided that no more than the potential uses within the general area of the following percentage of the greenbelt area is proposed use. Except as provided in this covered with impervious surfaces and the Section, a conditional use permit may not remainder is compatibly landscaped or reduce the requirements of the zone in which retained in a natural state: the use is to be located. Twenty five percent (25%), if the most B. Conditional Use Permit: The Hearing restrictive adjacent zoning is R-1 or G-1; Examiner may grant, with or without conditions, or deny the requested conditional Fifty percent (50%), if the most restrictive use permit pursuant to Chapter 8, Title IV of adjacent zoning is R-2, R-3, R-4, T, or P-1; the City Code. The Hearing Examiner may limit the term and duration of the conditional Sixty five percent (65%), if the most use permit. Conditions imposed by the restrictive adjacent zoning is B-1, O-P, L-1, Hearing Examiner shall reasonably assure H-1, or M-P; that nuisance or hazard to life or property will not develop. f. Production of resources — provided that the area is rehabilitated consistent with C. Criteria for Conditional Use: The Hearing the greenbelt definition; Examiner shall consider the following factors, among all other relevant information: g. Roadways and streets -- provided that any'street aligned parallel with the greenbelt 1. Comprehensive Plan: The proposed use should involve the minimum intrusion upon shall be compatible with the general purpose, the greenbelt while providing for enhancement goals, objectives and standards of the • through compatible landscaping. comprehensive plan, the zoning ordinance and any other plan, program, map or ordinance of 4. Other Greenbelts: Wetlands, stream the City of Renton. corridors and flood control facilities designated greenbelt shall be subject to the development 2. Community Need: There shall V be a ' standards of the City's shoreline master community need for the proposed use at the - program urban environment where those proposed location. In the determination of shoreline regulations would not otherwise community need the Hearing Examiner shall apply. consider the following factors, among all other relevant information: F. Other Allowable Uses: a. The proposed location shall not result 1. Nothing in these regulations shall limit the in either the detrimental over concentration of construction of one single family home on a a.particular use within the City or within the pre-existing platted lot, subject to meeting immediate area of the proposed use. any engineering requirements necessary to safely construct such a residence. b. That the proposed location is suited for the proposed use. 2. Where the provisions of these regulations limit construction of public or private utilities 3. Effect on Adjacent Properties: The proposed or appurtenant structures, approval for such use at the proposed location shall not result construction may be granted by approval of a in substantial or undue adverse effects on conditional use permit subject to a showing of adjacent property. The following site necessity and compatibility of the use with requirements shall be required: these regulations. (Ord. 3849, 10-8-84) a. Lot Coverage: Lot coverage in ..'3; M (See following page for Exhibit A, residential districts (R-1 and R-2) shall not s€'?ffsY Steep Slope Illustration) exceed fifty percent (50%) of the lot coverage 1 . 4-31-36 4-31-36 • C3a) of the zone in which the proposed use is to auditoriums used for social and sport --. be located. Lot coverage in all other zones activities, health centers, convents, preschool ( shall conform to the requirements of the zone facilities, convalescent homes and others of a _ .! in which the proposed use is to be located. similar nature shall be considered to be separate uses and shall be subject to the b. Yards: Yards shall conform to the provisions of the use district in which they requirements of the zone in which the are located. proposed use is to be located. Additions to the structure shall not be allowed in any required 10. Conversion: No existing building or yard. structure shall be converted to a conditional use unless such building or structure c. Height: Building and structure heights complies, or is brought into compliance, with shall conform to the requirements of the zone the provisions of this Chapter. in which the proposed use is to be located. Spires, belltowers, public utility antennas or 11. Public Improvements: The proposed use similar structures may exceed the height and location shall be adequately served by requirement upon approval of a variance. and not impose an undue burden on any Building heights should be related to public improvements, facilities, utilities and surrounding uses in order to allow optimal services. Approval of a conditional use permit sunlight and ventilation, and minimal may be conditioned upon the provision and/or obstruction of views from adjacent structures. guarantee by the applicant of necessary public improvements, facilities, utilities and/or 4. Compatibility: The proposed use shall be services. compatible with the residential scale and character of the neighborhood. (Ord. 3599, D. Additional Uses Permitted: 1-11-82) 1. Uses Prohibited Elsewhere: The Hearing 5. Parking: Parking under the building Examiner may grant a conditional use permit structure should be encouraged. Lot coverage for the following uses in districts from which ^ may be increased to as much as seventy five they fire prohibited where such uses are i percent (75%) of the lot coverage requirement deemed essential or desirable to the public of the zone in which the proposed use is convenience or welfare, and are in harmony located if all parking is provided underground with the various elements or objectives of the or within the structure. (Ord. 3903, 4-22-85) comprehensive plan: 6. Traffic: Traffic and circulation patterns of a. Cemetery, columbarium, crematory or vehicles and pedestrians relating to the mausoleum. proposed use and surrounding area shall be reviewed for potential effects on, and to b. Development of natural resources ensure safe movement in the surrounding (excluding the drilling for or producing.of oil, area. gas or other hydrocarbon substances) together with the necessary buildings, apparatus or 7. Noise, Glare: Potential noise, light and appurtenances incident thereto. glare impacts shall be evaluated based on the location of the proposed use on the lot and c. Educational institution, public or the location of on-site parking areas, outdoor private. recreational areas and refuse storage areas. d. Government offices and facilities . 8. Landscaping. Landscaping shall be provided (Federal, State and local). in all areas not occupied by buildings or paving. The Hearing Examiner may require e. Hospital, sanitarium or similar uses. additional landscaping to buffer adjacent properties from potentially adverse effects of f. Public or nonprofit library or museum. the proposed use. ,- g. Nursery or greenhouse. 9. Accessory Uses: Accessory uses to conditional uses such as day schools, 490 . 4-31-36 4-31-37` Dl) h. Park, playground or recreational or (1) The location must comply with the community center. State siting criteria as adopted in _ accordance with RCW 70.105.210. •. i. Philanthropic institution. (2) The location of the hazardous waste j. Private club, fraternal or nonprofit treatment and storage facility as subject organization. to site plan review and the applicable criteria set forth in Section 4-31-33. k. Public utility use or structure. " (Ord. 4186, 11-14-88) 1. Radio or television transmitter. (Ord. E. Application Procedure: Application for a 3599, 1-11-82) conditional use permit shall be submitted and reviewed pursuant to Chapter 8, Title IV of 2. Less Restricted Uses: The Hearing the City Code. The application shall include a Examiner may permit a less restricted use in site plan drawn to scale showing the actual a more restricted district as follows, provided dimensions and shape of the proposed site, such use, due to its limited nature, modern the exact sizes and locations of existing devices or building design will be no more buildings and structures, if any, and of the objectionable than the uses permitted in such proposed building or alteration. The plan shall district: show proposed landscaping, off-street parking, signs, ingress and egress and adjacent land a. Any B-1 District use in the P-1 uses. Any additional information requested by District. the Building Department shall be included in the application. (Ord. 3599, 1-11-82) b. Any L-1 District use in the B-1 District. 4-31-37: STANDARDS AND REVIEW CRITE- c. Any H-1 District use in the L-1 RIA FOR KEEPING ANIMALS: District. (Ord. 3953, 11-4-85) A. Purpose and Intent: Since the nature of 3. Hazardous Waste Treatment and Storage growth by definition generates greater i Facilities: competition by both humans and animals for �--' less available space, it is imperative that all a. Off-Site Facilities. The Hearing types be located appropriately and managed Examiner may grant a conditional use permit effectively to insure compatibility and for an off-site hazardous waste treatment and harmony. In particular, animals need to be storage facility in any zone which allows monitored to lessen the impacts of noise, odor, industrial and manufacturing uses that and potential nuisance not only on-site but process or handle hazardous substances; more particularly to adjacent properties. provided, that the use conforms with the criteria set forth in Section 4-31-36(C) above Animal owners keep their animals -for a and the following criteria: variety of reasons including, but not limited • to, companionship, affection and protection. (1) The location must comply with the State siting criteria as adopted in In order that lovers of animals may coexist accordance with RCW 70.105.210. harmoniously with those who don't, some general guidelines require statement. (2) The location of the hazardous waste treatment and storage facility is subject The keeping of animals by an owner/tenant to site plan review and the applicable. where permitted in the zoning. districts, shall • criteria set forth in Section 4-31-33. comply with the requirements of this Section. It is assumed that an animal owner either b. On-Site Facilities. The Hearing lives on the property where an animal is kept Examiner may grant a conditional use permit or has arranged with a tenant to care for the for an on-site hazardous waste treatment and animal. Household pets as defined in Section storage facility in any zone, except residential, 4-31-2H7 are permitted use in all zones in that allows the processing or handling of • the City and as such are not regulated by hazardous substances; provided, that the use , this Section provided they number three (3) ,;,;. conforms with the criteria set forth in Section or less. 4-31-36(C) above and the following criteria: 490 {j 5' I �(• ~y}'d "J s ,fie - /4-,- - s r '' r'1 z, ery ri6,44 �`f,k J�r • }• { 1 "{•1i rat Y: L (" . 3031 NE 10th Street `. Renton, WA 98056 (206)255-4751 Community (206)255-5460 FAX Church Jim Amandus Senior Pastor January 30, 1992 Mr. Lawrence J. Warren Warren, Kellogg, Barber, Dean & Fontes 100 S. Second St. P.O. Box 626 Renton, Washington 98057 Re: Escrow Instructions for Highlands Community Church Lot Line Adjustment and Easement Dear Mr. Warren: Pursuant to our agreement with Mark Pywell of the City of Renton Department of Planning, Highlands Community Church hereby appoints you and your firm as its escrow holder in connection with the conveyance of an easement to, and completion of a lot J line adjustment with, its neighbor The Golden Pines Apartments. The following constitute escrow instructions by Highlands Community Church for the holding and recording of the enclosed documents. These documents will, when recorded, effectuate the lot line• adjustment ("Lot Line Adjustment") and grant of easement ("Easement") required by the City of Renton in connection with the Highlands Community Church's present rezone and conditional use permit applications, Renton File No. ECF-048-90. You, as escrow holder, shall record the Lot Line Adjustment and the Easement only after all of the following events have occurred: (a) The City of Renton has issued a conditional use permit for the Highlands Community Church's proposed Christian Education Center addition, Renton File No. ECF-048-90. Highlands Community Church will furnish you with a copy of the approved permit within five (5) business days of its issuance. (b) The City of Renton has enacted an ordinance approving the rezone to P-1 of the portion of the property owned Bill Herman Ron Lawler Chris Renzelman Mike Smith Marlene Spann Bob Stevens Worship/Music Adult Ministries Students/Singles Small Group Ministries Children's Ministries Facilities Missions S Mr. Lawrence J. Warren January 30, 1992 Page 2 by Highlands Community Church that is presently zoned R-1, Renton File No. ECF-048-90. Highlands Community Church will furnish you with. a copy of the approved ordinance within five (5) business days of its effective date. Pursuant to Renton City Code ("RCC") § 1-2-2, the effective date of a rezone ordinance is thirty (30) days after its adoption by the City. (.c) All appeal periods applicable to the City's issuance of the conditional use permit and adoption of the rezone ordinance have expired with no appeal having been filed. Pursuant to RCC §. 4-8-16, the City of Renton Hearing Examiner's approval of a conditional use permit may be appealed to the Renton City Council within 14 days of the date of the Examiner's final written report issuing the permit. Pursuant to RCC § 4-8-17 (C) , the Renton City Council's adoption of a rezone ordinance and its decision on an appeal of a Hearing Examiner decision may be appealed to the King County Superior Court within thirty (30) days of the Council's action being appealed. Highlands Community Church will notify you within five (5) business days after the expiration of these appeal periods. In the event the City's issuance of a conditional use permit and/or its approval of a rezone ordinance for the Highlands Community Church's proposed Christian Education Center addition are appealed, this Condition (c) of recording shall be deemed fulfilled only after all such appeals have been fully resolved and the permit and rezone ordinance upheld. Highlands Community Church will notify you within five (5) business days of the filing of any such appeals, and will further notify you within five (5) business days of final resolution of such appeals. (d) The City of Renton has approved the Lot Line Adjustment pursuant to the provisions of RCC § 9-12-4 (E) . If the City requires revised or additional materials in order to approve the Lot Line Adjustment, Highlands Community Church may substitute such materials for, or add them to, the Lot Line Adjustment documents that accompany this letter. Highlands Community Church will notify you within five (5) business days of the City's approval of the Lot Line Adjustment. Mr. Lawrence J. Warren January 30, 1992 Page 3 You will be notified by Highlands Community Church when all of the conditions for recording of the Lot Line Adjustment and the Easement have been met. The Lot Line Adjustment and the Easement shall not be recorded until you receive such notification. Furthermore, the Easement shall be recorded only after the Lot Line Adjustment has been recorded. Highlands Community Church will pay applicable recording fees. The enclosed Real Estate Excise Tax Affidavit indicates that no excise tax will be due upon recording of the Lot Line Adjustment. Pursuant to WAC 458-61-360, no Real Estate Excise Tax Affidavit is required in order to record the Easement, which is granted without consideration. Under no circumstances shall either the Lot Line Adjustment or the Easement be recorded more than five (5) - years after the date of this letter. In the event that the Lot Line Adjustment and the Easement are not recorded within five (5) years of the date of this letter, you shall return the enclosed documents to Hillis Clark Martin & Peterson, P.S. , Attn: Michael Davis-Hall, 500 Galland Building, 1221 Second Avenue, Seattle, Washington 98101. Thank you for your assistance. Very truly yours, Highlands Community Church . By (�J Its L 1‘414112-A..4 Enclosures cc: Mr. Mark Pywell, City of Renton Department of Planning Mr. Michael Davis-Hall, Hillis Clark Martin & Peterson 3 1 1 4 2 5 WHEN RECORDED RETURN TO: Richard W. Ralston c/o Highlands Community Church 3031 N.E. 10th Street Renton, WA 98056 QUIT CLAIM DEED THE GOLDEN PINES PARTNERSHIP, a Washington limited partnership, for and in consideration of lot line adjustment, conveys and quit claims to HIGHLANDS COMMUNITY CHURCH, a Washington non-profit corporation,. the following described real estate, situated in King County, State of Washington, together with all after acquired title of the Grantor therein: That portion of Block 33 of the Corrected Plat of Renton Highlands No. 2, as per recorded plat thereof recorded in Volume 57 of Plats, on pages 92 to 98, inclusive, records of King County, Washington, described as follows: Commencing at the Northeast corner of Block 33 of said plat; Thence South 02°52'21" West along the East line of said Block 33 a distance of 220. 00 feet to the Northeast corner of Lot 4 of City of Renton Short Plat No. 188-76 as recorded under King County Recording Number 7808170836, and the true point of beginning; Thence South 87°07'39" East 30.00 feet to the centerline of vacated Jefferson Ave. N.E. ; Thence North 02°52'21" East along said centerline 30.00 feet; Thence North 87°'07'39" West 30. 00 feet to the East line .of said Block 33 ; Thence South 02°52'21" West along said East line 30.00 feet to the point of beginning. All situate in the City of Renton, County of King, State of Washington. Dated: 4V2 , 1991. The Golden Pines Partnership, a Washington limi ed partnership, by Conifer '=v-lop e s, Inc. , .a Washington corpora 't eneral partner . by Allan E. H nson, President by2 .e.-4/4-0_ 66( L ) . Secretary ' ' QUIT CLAIM DEED PAGE - 1 S STATE OF WASHINGTON ) • ) ss COUNTY OF ig�XG"- ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that ALLAN F /7/i9/uS o� and /2.4:e�k man tfr signed this instrument, on oath stated that they were authorized to execute the instrument and acknowledged it as the President and Secretary of Conifer Management, Inc. to be the free and voluntary act of such party for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated: Ct t a % /I`ll . //"11___:) t ry Public i and for the State of ashington, residing at My appointment expires: /z -S'- /75.y D5. 6: 08 : 4/15/91:dk • • • QUIT CLAIM DEED PAGE - 2 • MAY `7 1991 WHEN RECORDED RETURN TO: - Conifer Management, Inc. P. O. Box 11246 Tacoma, WA 98411 PARTIAL RELEASE OF MORTGAGE The owner and holder of that certain mortgage bearing date of September 1, 1976., executed by THE GOLDEN PINES PARTNERSHIP, a limited partnership, to secure payment of the sum of ONE MILLION ONE HUNDRED TWENTY-EIGHT THOUSAND NINE HUNDRED AND NO/100 Dollars ($1, 128,900. 00) and interest, and recorded under King County Recording Number 7609230681, for value received does hereby release and discharge from the lien of the said mortgage the following described portion of the mortgaged premises, situate in King County, Washington: That portion of Block 33 of the Corrected Plat of Renton Highlands No. 2 , according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 57 of Plats, pages 92 through 98, inclusive, record of King County, Washington described as follows: Commencing at the Northeast corner of Block 33 of said plat; Thence South 02°52'21" West along the East line of said Block 33- a distance of 220. 00 feet to the Northeast corner of Lot 4 of City of Renton Short Plat No. 188-76 as recorded under King County Recording No. 7808170836, and the true point of beginning; Thence South 87°07'39" East 30. 00 feet to the center line of vacated Jefferson Avenue N.E. ; . Thence.North 02°52'21" East along said centerline 30 . 00 feet; Thence North 87°07'39" West 30. 00 feet to the East line of the said Block 33; Thence South 02°52 '21" West along said East line 30 . 00 feet to the point of beginning. Situate in the City of Renton, King County, Washington. But this release shall not impair the lien of the said mortgage as to the lands therein described not hereby released. DATED: y , 1991. USGI,Inc. as Servicing Correspondent ecurity Pa 'fic National Trust Company (New ork) T Q BY: 461 William M. Prentice, Vice President 1 STATE OF CCow,.Jc'c- cur ) COUNTY OF • IS }) �--T tS tc.o f a Notary Public, in and for said County, in t eState aforesaid, do hereby certify that (,1I :z;-,,:.. L, i..e-.Jrc« , pers1 pnal y known to me to be the same person whose name is, as Vlc QES,l,c,.j-r of USGI, Inc. , a corporation of the State of Clo,�,�e7c•,-tc - subscribed to the foregoing instrument, appeared before me in person and severally acknowledged that he/sire, being thereunto duly authorized, signed, sealed with corporate seal, and delivered the said instrument as the free and voluntary act of said corporation and as his/her own free and voluntary act, for the uses and purposes therein set • forth. Given under my hand and notarial seal, this V- - day of tivl.4 s/ , 1991 l 1 � A-‘A„J Notary PubYi • My commission expires • CONSENT BY HUD TO PARTIAL RELEASE The undersigned, intending to be legally bound by the terms hereof, hereby evidences its consent to, and approval of, all of the terms, conditions and provisions of the foregoing Partial Release. THE UNITL) STATES OF AMERICA, ACTING BY AND THROUGH THE SECRETARY OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT BY: TITLE: 1 Filed for Record at .Request of; THIS SPACE RESERVED After Recording Mail to: FOR RECORDER'S USE: HILLIS CLARK MARTIN & PETERSON, P.S. 500 Galland Building 1221 Second Avenue Seattle, Washington 98101-2925 Attn: Michael Davis-Hall EASEMENT _ HIGHLANDS COMMUNITY CHURCH ("Grantor") , as owner of the property described in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference ("Grantor's Property") , hereby grants, conveys, and quit claims to THE GOLDEN PINES PARTNERSHIP ("Grantee") , as owner of the property described in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference ("Grantee's Property") , a non-exclusive perpetual appurtenant easement over, upon, and across the following portion of Grantor's Property, located in King County, State of Washington ("Easement Area") : Beginning at the northwesterly corner of Grantee's Property; thence north 54 °35 ' 42" west along the southerly margin of N.E. 10th Street a distance of 20. 00 feet; thence south 5° 09 ' 24" west a distance of 243 . 99 feet; thence south 65°27 ' 01" east a distance of 18. 32 feet; thence north 5° 09 ' 24" east a distance of 240. 00 feet to the point of beginning. Said easement is solely for vehicular ingress and egress over, upon,, and across the Easement Area to and from Grantee's Property. Grantor reserves the right to use the Easement Area in any manner not inconsistent with Grantee's rights hereunder. The rights granted hereunder shall inure to the benefit of the successors and assigns to Grantee's Property. EXECUTED this :30 day of January, 1992 . HIGHLANDS COMMUNITY CHURCH, a Washington non-profit corporation By I (k ) ^ Its Ch¢t,�ka l9c.uQ a6 �t - 1 STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ss. COUNTY OF KING ) On this 3) day of January, 1992, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared co -S [41a2T L4.3 LLA , to me known to be , or aomeo6F of Highlands Community Church, the corporation that executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that he/she was authorized to execute said instrument. WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEA hereto affixed the day and year first above written. //2, OT Y PUBLIC in an for the • St e W shington, residing at My ommission expires 3 1 1 4 2 4 - 2 - EXHIBIT A Parcel A: Block 32 , corrected plat of Renton Highlands No. 2 , according to the plat recorded in Volume 57 of Plats, pages 92 to 98, in King County, Washington, together with those portions of vacated Jefferson Avenue N.E. adjoining which upon vacation attached to said premises by operation of law. Also together with the following described parcel: Commencing at the northeast corner of Block 33 of said plat; thence south 02 °52 ' 21" west along the east line of said Block 33 a distance of 220. 00 feet to the northeast corner of Lot 4 of City of Renton Short Plat No. 188-78 as recorded under King County Recording Number 7808170836, and the true point of beginning; thence south 87 ° 07 ' 39" east 30 . 00 feet to the centerline of vacated Jefferson Avenue N.E. ; thence north 02 °52 ' 21" east along said centerline 30 . 00 feet; thence north 87 °07 ' 39" west 30. 00 feet to the east line of said Block 33 ; thence south 02 °52 ' 21" west along said east line 30. 00 feet to the point of beginning. Parcel B: Lot 4 , Renton Short Plat No. 188-78 recorded under Auditor's File No. 7808170836, being a portion of Block 33 , corrected plat, Renton Highlands No. 2 , according to the plat recorded in Volume 57 of Plats, pages 92 to 98 , inclusive, in King County, Washington and a portion of Renton. Highlands, according to the plat recorded in Volume 46 of Plats, pages 34 to 41, inclusive, in King County, Washington, together with that portion of vacated Jefferson Avenue N.E. adjoining which upon vacation attached to said premises by operation of law. All situate in the City of Renton, County of King, State of Washington. - 3 - J' ti EXHIBIT B That portion of Block 33 of the corrected plat of Renton Highlands No. 2 , as per recorded plat thereof recorded in Volume 57 of Plats on pages 92 to 98 , inclusive, Records of King County, Washington, described as follows: Beginning at the northeast corner of said Block 33 ; thence northwesterly along the south margin of N.E. 10th Street on a curve to the right with a radius of 930. 66 feet, a distance of 221. 94 feet to the point of tangency; thence north 54 °36 ' 45" west a distance of 32 . 07 feet; thence_ south 05 ° 08 ' 21" west a distance of 240. 00 feet; thence south 65°27 ' 17" east a distance of 244 . 88 feet to a point on the westerly margin of vacated Jefferson Avenue N.E. , said point being 220 . 00 feet southerly of the northeast corner of said Block 33 ; thence north 02 °52 ' 21" east along said westerly margin a distance of 220. 00 feet to the point of beginning; together with those portions of vacated Jefferson Avenue N.E. adjoining which upon vacation attached to said premises by operation of law; Except the following described portion of vacated Jefferson Avenue N.E. : Commencing at the northeast corner of Block 33 of said plat; thence south 02 °52 ' 21" west along the east line of said Block 33 a distance of 220. 00 feet to the northeast corner of Lot 4 of City of Renton Short Plat No. 188-78 as recorded under King County Recording Number 7808170836, and the true point of beginning; thence south 87 ° 07 ' 39" east 30. 00 feet to the centerline of vacated Jefferson Avenue N.E. ; thence north 02 °52 ' 21" east along said centerline 30. 00 feet; thence north 87 ° 07 ' 39" west 30. 00 feet to the east line of said Block 33 ; thence south 02 °52 ' 21" west along said east line 30. 00 feet to the point of beginning. All situate in the City of Renton, County of King, State of Washington. 3 1 1 4 2 4 - 4 - ��Submit to County Treasurer of the REAL ESTATE EXCISE TAX This form is your receipt when stamped county in which property is located. by cashier. Pay by cash or certified CHAPTER 82.45 RCW check to County Treasurer. PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT CHAPTER 458.61 WAC THIS AFFIDAVIT WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED UNLESS ITEMS Q THROUGH O ARE FULLY COMPLETED O Name The Golden Pines Partnership, by Conifer® Highlands Community Church Name mg Developments, Inc. , its general partner w IL WI 2 y 0 Street 3848 So. Junett, P.O. Box 11246 m< 03 Cr 3031 N.E. 10th Street ri Street City Tacoma slate WA Zip 98411 City Renton state WA zip 98056 O NEW OWNER'S Name Highlands Community Church ALL TAX PARCEL NUMBERS PERMANENT ADDRESS 7227801027 FOR ALL PROPERTY Street 3031 N.E. 10th Street • TAX RELATED CORRESPONDENCE City/State Renton, WA zip 98056 0 LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY SITUATED IN UNINCORPORATED COUNTY ElOR IN CITY OF Renton See Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. • • 0 Is this property ourrently: YES NO 0 Description of personal property if included in sale(furniture,ap- Classified or designated as forest land? Chapter 84.33 RCW ❑ ® pliances,etc.) Nt7nP Classified as current use land(open space, x farm and agricultural,or timber)?Chapter 84.34 RCW ❑ Exempt from property tax under nonprofit If exemption claimed,explain See Exhibit B attached El Chapter 84.36 RCW? hereto and incorporated herein by this Receiving special valuation as historic reference. property under Chapter 84.26 RCW? ❑ 0 Type of Document Quit Claim Deed Type Property: El land only ❑ land with new building. Date of Document September 27, 1991 "❑ land with previously ❑ land with mobile home Gross Sale Price 1/ $ -0- - used building Personal Property(deduct)2/ $ —0— SEE TAX OBLIGATIONS ON REVERSE SIDE O Taxable Sale Price $ -0- (1) NOTICE OF CONTINUANCE (RCW)84.33 or RCW 84.34) Excise Tax: State $ -0- If the new owner(s)of land that is classified or designated as current use or forest Local 3/ $ —O— land wish(es) to continue the classification or designation of such land, the new Delinquent Interest:4/State $ —0— owner(s) must sign below. If the new owner(s) do(es) not desire to continue such classification or designation,all compensating or additional tax calculated pursuant Local $ -n- to RCW 84.33.120 and 140 or RCW 84.34.108 shall be due and payable by the seller or transferor at the time of sale. The county assessor must determine if the land Delinquent Penalty:4/State $ -0- transferred qualifies to continue classification or designation and must so indicate Total Due $ —0— below. Signatures do not necessarily mean the land will remain in classification or designation. If it no longer qualifies, it will be removed and the compensating taxes (SEE 1-5 ON REVERSE SIDE) will be applied.All new owners must sign. This land does ❑ does not qualify Q AFFIDAVIT for continuance. DEPUTY ASSESSOR I CERTIFY UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON THAT THE FOREGOING IS TRUE DATE AND CORRECT (s ems_#5 n re erse for penalties). (3) NOTICE OF COMPLIANCE(Chapter 84.26 RCW) SIGNATURE )�— L --,.• If the new owner(s) of property with special valuation as historic property j�r I I t wish(s)to continue this special valuation the new owner(s) must sign below, If NAME (print) W ' the new owner(s)do(es)not desire to continue such special valuation,all addi- tional tax calculated pursuant to Chapter 84.26 RCW,shall be due and payable DATE & PLACE OF SIGNING: I -3D-'IZ ►LC.4 •ten,(/i A- by the seller or transferor at the time of sale. (3) OWNER(S)SIGNATURE SPECIFY(circle): grantor gr •ntee grantor's agent/grantee's agent Address of residence or place of business of person signing (specify): • Highlands Community Church 3031 N.E. 10th Street, Renton, WA 98056 D The following optional questions are requested by RCW 82.45.120 Is property at the time of sale: YES NO YES NO e. Does conveyance involve a trade,partial a. Subject to elderly,disability,or physical improvement interest corporate affiliates,related parties, 1❑ 2❑ exemption? 1❑ 2❑ trust,receivership or an estate? f• Is the grantee acting as a nominee for a third 1❑ 2❑ b. Does building, if any, have a heat pump or solar party? heating or cooling system? 1❑ 2 El g. Principal use: C. Does this conveyance divide a current parcel of land? 1❑ 2❑ 1 ❑ agricultural 2 ❑ condominium 3 ❑ recreational d. Dmber?oes ale include current crop or merchantable 1❑ 2❑ 4 ❑ apt(4+ units) 5 El industrial • 6 El residential ti7 ❑ commercial 8 ❑ mobile home 9 ❑ timber FOR TREASURER'S USE ONLY 'rim REV 84-0001 3m c7)e81 •„ss• COUNTY TREASURER 1 f % 1 EXHIBIT A Commencing at the northeast corner of Block 33 of the corrected plat of Renton Highlands No. 2, as per recorded plat thereof recorded in Volume 57 of Plats on pages 92 to 98 , inclusive, Records of King County, Washington; thence south 02 °52 ' 21" west along the east line of said Block 33 a distance of 220. 00 feet to the northeast corner of Lot 4 of City of Renton Short Plat No. 188-78 as recorded under King County Recording Number 7808170836, and the true point of beginning; thence south 87 ° 07 ' 39" east 30. 00 feet to the centerline of vacated Jefferson Avenue N.E. ; thence -north 02 °52 ' 21" east along said centerline 30. 00 feet; thence north 87 °07 ' 39" west 30. 00 feet to the east line of said Block 33 ; thence south 02 °52 ' 21" west along said east line 30. 00 feet to the point of beginning. 3 1 1 4 8 4 EXHIBIT B Explanation for claimed exemption: There is no monetary consideration for this minor lot line adjustment, which has been required by the City of Renton. As confirmed on January 30, 1992 by Ms. Priscilla Harper of the King County Real Estate Excise Tax Department, this lot line adjustment is exempt from the real estate excise tax. In addition, the grantee is a tax-exempt organization under RCW ch. 84 . 36. 3 1 1 4 8 4 EXHIBIT A Commencing at the northeast corner of Block 33 of the corrected plat of Renton Highlands No. 2 , as per recorded plat thereof recorded in Volume 57 of Plats on pages 92 to 98, inclusive, Records of King County, Washington; thence south 02 °52 ' 21" west along the east line of said Block 33 a distance of 220. 00 feet to the northeast corner of Lot 4 of City of Renton Short Plat No. 188-78 as recorded under King County Recording Number 7808170836, and the true point of beginning; thence south 87°07 ' 39" east 30. 00 feet to the centerline of vacated Jefferson Avenue N.E. ; thence north 02 °52 ' 21" east along said centerline 30. 00 feet; thence north 87 °07 ' 39" west 30. 00 feet to the east line of said Block 33 ; thence south 02 °52 ' 21" west along said east line 30. 00 feet to the point of beginning. 3 1 1 4 8 4 EXHIBIT B Explanation for claimed exemption: There is no monetary consideration for this minor lot line adjustment, which has been required by the City of Renton. As confirmed on January 30, 1992 by Ms. Priscilla Harper of the King County Real Estate Excise Tax Department, this lot line adjustment is exempt from the real estate excise tax. In addition, the grantee is a tax-exempt organization under RCW ch. 84 . 36. 3 1 1 4 8 4 EXHIBIT A Commencing at the northeast corner of Block 33 of the corrected plat of Renton Highlands No. 2, as per recorded plat thereof recorded in Volume 57 of Plats on pages 92 to 98 , inclusive, Records of King County, Washington; thence south 02 °52 ' 21" west along the east line of said Block 33 a distance of 220. 00 feet to the northeast corner of Lot 4 of City of Renton Short Plat No. 188-78 as recorded under King County Recording Number 7808170836, and the true point of beginning; thence south 87 °07 ' 39" east 30. 00 feet to the centerline of vacated Jefferson Avenue N.E. ; thence -north 02 °52 ' 21" east along said centerline 30. 00 feet; thence north 87 ° 07 ' 39" west 30. 00 feet to the east line of said Block 33 ; thence south 02 °52 ' 21" west along said east line 30. 00 feet to the point of beginning. 3 1 1 4 8 4 EXHIBIT B Explanation for claimed exemption: There is no monetary consideration for this minor lot line adjustment, which has been required by the City of Renton. As confirmed on January 30, 1992 by Ms. Priscilla Harper of the King County Real Estate Excise Tax Department, this lot line adjustment is exempt from the real estate excise tax. In addition, the grantee is a tax-exempt organization under RCW ch. 84 . 36. 3 1 1 4 8 4 EXHIBIT A Commencing at the northeast corner of Block 33 of the corrected plat of Renton Highlands No. 2, as per recorded plat thereof recorded in Volume 57 of Plats on pages 92 to 98 , inclusive, Records of King County, Washington; thence south 02 °52 ' 21" west along the east line of said Block 33 a distance of 220. 00 feet to the northeast corner of Lot 4 of City of Renton Short Plat No. 188-78 as recorded under King County Recording Number 7808170836, and the true point of beginning; thence south 87 °07 ' 39" east 30. 00 feet to the centerline of vacated Jefferson Avenue N.E. ; thence north 02 °52 ' 21" east along said centerline 30. 00 feet; thence north 87°07 ' 39" west 30. 00 feet to the east line of said Block 33 ; thence south' 02 °52 ' 21" west along said east line 30. 00 feet to the point of beginning. 3 1 1 4 8 4 ' EXHIBIT B Explanation for claimed exemption: There is no monetary consideration for this minor lot line adjustment, which has been required by the City of Renton. As confirmed on January 30, 1992 by Ms. Priscilla Harper of the King County Real Estate Excise Tax Department, this lot line adjustment is exempt from the real estate excise tax. In addition, the grantee is a tax-exempt organization under RCW ch. 84 . 36. 3 1 1 4 8 4 1 • i a i ` ------- PETITION EXHIBIT TO: Honorable Mayor Earl Clymer BYO,_., _ Honorable Members of the City Council h. t ,,, e0. 6_01/v- Yo 'a`, Honorable Hearing Examiner ITEM. .`" .J,r. , ~' b The undersigned respectfully indicate their support of, and request approval by the City of Renton of the pending application by Highlands Community Church for approval of a rezone from R-1 to P-1, and the issuance of a Conditional Use Permit to allow construction by the church of a Christian Education building. , • Registered . Renton Voter _7 _ Si lature�___,_-_,L j Print Name Address es INo J, _-_____. �1/ . . .6w1/&Y_ s1s07e/0 4' P I - . ,_3� h,R � Y_1 h_A;L _...--Q. --t Cam.r wir--,� 1�%./lam ..r� A .,c4/0,Y�InCC�� 3�• iL• cj //. . EA Af -x v► le✓ 43ci.s"// Sea. 9$l7 �'; V �L,�i.J//,1 IPA.., ,y�r�. 1 -ri' �Y.tem I3laoys.e.1070AR./ f e.n n. c w.I I°A r`'.S c),s s Ers1<"r4 L W n t4 + :A. la.� •A IIA�I 0 A s. Ac N D iJ� (3 bi 9 Sb"`P`1, V- MI? i / . Snh cis,vi -76o/Y1rE2gnc jCPu lb � , - , 14A.1--, iE// / 3z7 4 - r /bY-t; c-ca. L * !i/4 hearse 1uN1iu /t9h, loS3 A- //7ds4 [_— /)G — i 44/A/ ',9uc,�/i-C os su. wrrArl ,N,-Aiz,,A ' - 'I" , ,,,,a.e -et /1,-", ,ely ,1_ 41-1--ta--, 1 V.,ws /7?A.e._,. --- 0, )4 "*Ai '-.1,a.�/ LP [1 2/ i Ia 9 NSF, / ?'`X S7-�e,0; . - e7,w f iae.._:: 14.r Esw (a//oD)/. -(/ ,523 ,p r , f//l/E , / if is r/ Z PETITION TO: Honorable Mayor Earl Clymer Honorable Members of the City Council Honorable Hearing Examiner The undersigned respectfully indicate their support of, and request approval by the City of Renton of the pending application by Highlands Community Church for approval of a rezone from R-1 to P-1, and the issuance of a Conditional Use Permit to allow construction by the church of a Christian Education building. Registered Renton Voter _ Sianatu e__ ____-..I, i ___ Print Name I Address IYes INS -41,01 .-------- -4-/1-1-4-‘-73, Natkol.,> ,3‘26 '&debt)Aye W, X tt �, a ,k/A _ oci `, ,axee. 9�,3t/"_1 , Ail mine tV4V4 -�. 1/Vtl /. kl� S �y Yrl ..5bv,(loL.c! 14n1i % 1 R.5. , it J 16 &ilk i I. hia6.6067. A i 7b® 'to�' ' � W& . Al h��a ) !PO,,, ,,� -- /;-nr,t/`/,/. "?A' ,� ' 0 I ,*- =L nA. W-e-,-- - 1JVi /A1 Al /c. /i ze /YO a.4,6,J .t,-Ai e i ,.._. t CL ,/P1=iv4 ( /Aunt I , ► ,, iitrz.ki yof, /1_,.., .al7. 4&./ Ronc ICJ L. ineCaV , 1622 Lk. %v,va5 &rV st AP j 4- 722 4e n1 .&tiVA- Al. ENaRN Jaye/74/2-•AP6 , s..E o V. . cj. .I)a,,ti; i . _IV Pa 41 1)4n 1 5, .L9110 sti 433•z el_ x su,n L. ..ripe v M� Su.c.atil...% V V,A.rvC4--\ IA 0.0�'t.. 133^°1 9L o(. 1 ..; GJY n�� , ,_,-r— tt� .., per_t v %1 r Ott'IA 1-, s 0-11 '161-2. 50re;e?v S Q M iri% le '% % i,T� i//f%'/r 5,7OA/ /y?2/�r/G,'4/// Die . )C J ,.� iEPrNNcr(e t'R (s't'aiv i4zzl W. I,IC. 1-01-10eaN ®r2SL X ti if it, 3 PETITION TO: Honorable Mayor Earl Clymer Honorable Members of the City Council Honorable Hearing Examiner The undersigned respectfully indicate their support of, and request approval by the City of Renton of the pending application by Highlands Community Church for approval of a rezone from R-1 to P-1, and the issuance of a Conditional Use Permit to allow construction by the church of a Christian Education building. Registered Renton Voter Signature Print Name Address Yes No OcY.ww..2 C. )JN I EL Coo rEit (Zoo' z444k et,. 5E c A {bit_ 114-ieg N FaR_.P'//t! -La S" ✓ GC/ \ e4-g-3,9i24- 1L1/L L,/4/9-i S c,9 SK/,u u ) so c—' ) 14tdol .2oc /(cX �3/r`.�' S ✓g° 1- r ,. 11?° ,Aft.-11'rrirmiliefir, s,dis ,o.�,r_a/1 �. 3'��i�f /22�/ Sf lam±k b I�/f�✓u e �nJ .R3..fit RIASSe.J ) Ptkf loc., S7lc //7 P� ri PETITION TO: Honorable Mayor Earl Clymer • Honorable Members of the City Council Honorable Hearing Examiner The undersigned respectfully indicate their support of, and request approval by the City of Renton of the pending application by Highlands Community Church for approval of a rezone from R-1 to P-1, and the issuance of a Conditional Use Permit to allow construction by the church of a Christian Education building. Registered Renton Voter Sianature ,I Print Name Address JYes INo 1 Mao /-e ,c 1/-en • r :a e_t. 1/��Ct-a/�.zL � c � CF n T 3=6 a LV_EO - _ ,--_ Y. ID e N - ,..y&'Tc'4 _.�3 /,. c/O6,e CT i C- 1 X �,�� Ei12R�o Xd r...57"GI,, ,fib f7goie.9 x'N • Q Kri 4-a 34 PP q t2,eliafd w4/ 37gs RE- Ye t • ) -.4 12 4 M. l/i✓ 3 31 P N �' 7 P L %a _4 . J)en c A . 13e r) II z3Co tk Vn i Cn noo 11.E. X Z-z G I IvE 1,0 Ge,1_1 11e' .� �A,e� • '7'I- k N7-o to c-, 1 707 i✓e is ^ GSA?Lel V - • - • ;i Gy �Q Ce_s TF�er�-I� C-a101 IV) . ) ai;-l�o,,4rr.x r_ lye is 5 PETITION TO: , Honorable Mayor Earl Clymer Honorable Members of the City Council Honorable Hearing Examiner The undersigned respectfully indicate their support of, and request approval by the City of Renton of the pending application by Highlands Community Church for approval of a rezone from R-1 to P-1, and the issuance of a - Conditional Use Permit to allow construction by the church of a Christian Education building. Registered Renton Voter Signatu �/ Print Name Address Yes No a lai ,/ c5'/Yt T-. A-67o6' S . r J-Z,1 k p ' ` . TSAR G Atil.Shistri.t. 1 So 51 S►. E. l 2 8 t7t 4 vi, i0., A. i rende/ -lintsi Its Ts satct,ek )t FP�,f itAe r49l4VV'SE k ;few/ %W/ 11917 +�E 1756 Sr. L,-.2o5 ICAltd /` /,AV47,Pt' ?. SWiEvt?r2 l/0/7 , -Ip„r �t•2oS" `�' . _ f V'et/c es tri/G j-' //0/9 S elf X 1 V ' ./ . Ko .V . L-.�. /7/ ? TAL13or a5. C ;., 2 J4,14 e C'. e.l arff /3.7it 19S''',1 ;5'e ' r iv`_.lip-`_ ,..� t Ppp-ra"tic�c i4"tct- 'v PiD5 SO 2.8-°1 e r ., ` 'o,Lt Dit, 15 t4�3"7 se 9")4., X /;rgi,7:, z) �eiso eva ii elw.l R P I? as /.,. t.it_~ J.., 14. i . . / -10, 9rff �.,J�-r4 Snv !_ 3.� /�� tJ / �'. jC01ID E u1n?� ) 3S lld 5 L--I. th., /` i , , , nilfA- I-00ck 3c/%tiyp-`= cfp- X • 3 :: p. (P • PETITION TO: Honorable Mayor Earl Clymer Honorable Members of the City Council Honorable Hearing Examiner - The undersigned respectfully indicate their support of, and request approval by the City of Renton of the pending application by Highlands Community Church for approval of a rezone from R-1 to P-1, and the issuance of a Conditional Use Permit to allow construction by the church of a Christian Education building. Registered Renton Voter Signature Print Name Address Y s No ,mails G! hub G1 1T 134,23 SE'/9/s r III.. Lynn t c..kQo j 146211 Sa- !67 Sf 'Oq..s %el-. (2.0c.x.t'%4 t'Ls'zet se- id 7.sr H L ill 17.4t77-ex Z-NawARO , Iii /3931 F. Lk /CATN<cN F+4 A 8,44.. vo'Iiiawc.. r. rs ii m-r 12r s. PHgge' Or. a X II ri.u's Janis I►M)1acs aye/ if/ 7'I. ,S 0. X nAil r „� �... s0,.> 1i AJc ) I/7o9 22 sip k' ,.� I)t p a 1.R s+ L- f-(�Th err �l 9�'S. - � j�f v►�f- (" o� i�z C-3e�.H�i �hQ.rtc�r� �iaa Ai-E. al,st s-1 Rer, ,r) � �/J4 n� �'nct Vr ' -c�VA vA i NAQ - .a o,.! .. a e� 4v� OF ?Pcn`ip,1, X ' tc� J Cheis Lel,nic,t. I zi30 SE 7_s0'4/darc I/M 5 )k� `v CeU, 5�oo ., 3C OD S6 (1-fills i 3wi X 4<o ,z, , „�0 0�,h i',, Pooh 1/0 r•f`ti a 0.V1�A n to I(r f C SC-- I (- -I),L S,$ X Lint) 7P, e/ � li01H^tr» C iri .;(iv) 16,300 S . ir,s- I S+. x 4im .iegluk 1 m g Kitiela,t4 72 6 St, Ink- t<I4y, -� a fd -- ,bi.�0 .,i B ui.✓/ /227o , E,1e22 v .o,Sz-O-s nrcw- -.-e---r-d DD8 r OR u.4r,'a-R 136, 3 51670 e-e. a u et/Ty diP ` g knee AV-raen DS1IZR ill I71. h / 0To / _(/ - To -6F M. ��r-N_&Iv ©/ /7 � -e iz ( j J t &'''' ZI PETITION TO: Honorable Mayor Earl Clymer Honorable Members of the City Council Honorable Hearing Examiner The undersigned respectfully indicate their support of, and request approval by the City of Renton of the pending application by Highlands Community Church for approval of a rezone from R-1 to P-1, and the issuance of a Conditional Use Permit to allow construction by the church of a Christian Education building. Registered Renton Voter Il! _ Sianature _ _ Print Name I Address ties INo 1, JLi, 4i Ja Apt S. hlDwaro 6i_e7)0 4 Ave. S.Z. Rardw Q0.1.1. Ualeri'e Z� o wa,ra 110 1..9 , 4„acv, X�, _RAJ, //??'DQ �u cc1nI11e 3 r (k S, E. 14- "JSt, mA���:f`�aat.0_ ����� (.n r, ,S-ka v e_ v 2 s I3 z(! S. aA v,1'e)v. '� 41 1. &a/1 4,6 n eke, /r,/ft am / n,74,1 4 =A'-rs h ,4�►� c5,47. c •- X Ai/ ,G.�b' c ,i<�/<-e ,i.444 .2') Cr0, `3"n X -i ` A Al?A is A (/_I?!A,rt jp� sacl IFAS N .,��.,,.. � fl / Hog T �i/. .�/,i 1 t rirI1 V'+\ '`p �� FL ZQfn . _. nonna Evans loll 30�fe Rerltrn G►c> k n S h iiP 7 _ fitZ z,3 A/An_to O► (Li,F /5' 9//T,y listii9-3 s .. 54„1114 - N' 17L 8 PETITION TO: Honorable Mayor Earl Clymer Honorable Members of the City Council Honorable Hearing Examiner The undersigned respectfully indicate their support of, and request approval by the City of Renton of the pending application by Highlands Community Church for approval of a rezone from R-1 to P-1, and the issuance of a Conditional Use Permit to allow construction by the church of a Christian Education building. - Registered Renton Voter a _ Signature .1 Print Name Address ____tes No J, . 4.74:-,_/661.. _......_ -/i * 6 C6.66 -----LCOcLitide• fAir F0A4 c...„----- IPpula24evvrtak LEA-suk.. / ie 19-<5/Leivelok 1/.2wo-s&-- I_LIE_ %'/�' JAN t s L. F,b izrt�s ZRO /VE&1i Pi. flitY1 ' , frat IowA-W • ?oRcH�r2s 2?07 Ne_�" PL roty .1 aracepiel 125-tos&df7 -- gent . „fit u �t-Lhn� M.f'�a.b.►r) t bo'1 Lke,?r trt4% Waif SE,t. ____,_ _.,65e. i'1 4 ...�✓ /Go7Z..4.rE Y.�.0�s.u.9X* )e. u ra t. cry iL 's "'if/ st- /66-nv aei &A c,,,, . ...., 111A et, adeltr Glendct Cht46,e,rs (2,311 sr-_ twt-h Renfo✓1 dlIPr N (// '✓i,',l �J,A 11011,1 Wee d1 birli(l y -rrk_'1i e R c vn ,rtoP j`?-- ,e ,7 !- r z Gt�0008.e.ror a229 /7770/1fr ,1 ,era 'It 67"yipV d ,Rrer hi j.� iiihri..qta. ,29,251 4kc-i9VA St, FRYlia V ._, ( ,,/:� ' Sket. ry l,�'c�s�f 1'//8 Sg.•/-s' .cep X . /', , 9 - I t PETITION TO: Honorable Mayor Earl Clymer Honorable Members of the City Council Honorable Hearing Examiner The undersigned respectfully indicate their support of, and request approval by the City of Renton of the pending application by Highlands Community Church for approval of a rezone from R-1 to P-1, and the issuance of a Conditional Use Permit to allow construction by the church of a Christian Education building. . Registered Renton Voter r Sign_t 4 _Print Name Address r,, Yes No id /*ct4A der.....464 ��, ut N GUST /3/G w 5410 ' ?? Lor: ''da oh WhlidrndnCf NE 4 4 i? 7 - , . 2i Art 41-na4r6 9d rndae eir.. n,�-'. �/ /6,.,1 0 g•-- (�_ ji,..,,�7q Pe /j-e- 3oseis/cnAde. J� !. , Iliad dee. 5 c.iiet.r7` 28z S-- A/c 2/7` x LcA DMv► S-l-r ujct.r 4 - �8'aS AJ �-(s� >< / i�le ✓b o�V�s w o•��u►e S- ,X �' '1,�54 � 5��� v rn l r' I 162 30 3((1h 4\J X, x , f-a_ Aski n H`il l n ka o.0 tChIstr,�39-A K - I/,4 -- I��II y .Jok��fr, NI3I 5F Niav tr.4t Ygel 0 X ' . �+,y 44k<<,,„ l.?od1 SF_ tn. >< �t� --t(Nen 0,u(Y-e 1 , 3 3 c-Ss-/6r411.. X MP- ,_/i, e ir s/ / 0 F.4/ /i 19XDI 3-,f- ias It )c eix,3 . -I< ki LEE=rrti:4 805 S . 28T+ CT ty...., D L vru, L,r' i9fro6 s /27- s -.ass- a� PA<A, /4Y�A/E-1/ 21g9 s.1W S-/. ' ? fw-- Zc /D PETITION TO: .Honorable Mayor Earl Clymer Honorable Members of the City Council Honorable Hearing Examiner The undersigned respectfully indicate their support of, and request approval by the City of Renton of the pending application by Highlands Community Church for approval of a rezone from R-1 to P-1, and the issuance of a Conditional Use Permit to allow construction by the church of a Christian Education building. Registered Renton Voter (`tSianature ____ . _ _ Print Name I Address !Yes 'NA _, etc eLi4 3,4ti./-__ 0 921-(if i 1 6 r.,e p- 4, _ 4' '9,ezi .k..p6A-__ _".g.A,_Li_.A.:E , ga-24 -I 1 i'44- _.S& Li7 ' r.e -t: I''. 1 Tau A nC 4- o�1p1.�:l.dl7 SE I<3S1-�` , V .2_ L awt-i-e L- ,0v-t7- /e227 .S6 /3.�"` ,--1 ' �v 1 Po+1-y Cove 13$.),t $& )4 t,Rent l µ 1 . 'annky tca.x. . _,, UtPx 1�11 1r c.aV P..t _ a.C7Lo Sim 14<Q-1 G. S t -l'/' ��'1,�� r t9 fret Of S /Gr325"c56,, Hind(S� -V. 1� .rl .5 ,�A) 44L7"oIJ 7ZO ix AigA7.aun A?ide i � 110 ✓ /�,,,,�G1 L.La CA-- 1+i_ R IVI A A1, p4 v I_- .- 1 e1.,41,c.0-Ca4e.s Ofei.4;.0 - ✓ 0 447j"- cL"t' �v1) A dr) r- pAit 1-- to rc 1 t g I ✓✓ i� �(((entd 4 /�i s e I4�4 /-/C7 /�/S - V /R I 'Pig-U ,s' ` , /add 3 5 7,r�-4-rr'. c- �x . f� I 0i4.e / ,,. .'. ) .,,le I.� f)I l h ,� , VIJ 6 fro- /Lt s zt( /6 7� ?,L. .� d/ te_., : : 2L--1 o y, I1 , i' c 3 7vy ME 9 a+ Rom-*,, .)i WNW .7a. Cez,, BR,M h. :4-s a7D4-n..l'g-9.46 cr kg/km/0 . )( N_L - V q..�L\TIVC c rf f Cc'i ne_Nona i' ii1 1,a.t- S rr_i F.c-i4c\Cgt*trl M. X , Sr/ i/A4� ?;110 iris �1 5sC`'-r- /Q1. 1 f -/TJ�5�% 14 v Lti P'" , Lc 1 e Lit ,i sC �, l9.e�31c�-1 s -SC `�Q- � ,� �� .imar q COO - j36�.)19/� Sr &ut7Zl,lc 5a�a``) e - / / �' . i'13Ry. AKzl427tr ION . s"5'.1 c s d% .. ( 574 C�~-1F 1 o r61 -Norri�c� v. 2 m Mr- frAi rill), 0 �E Ie I442-tI- I vie Po 11wv (06777 &titn t 6 if 2D // PETITION TO: Honorable Mayor Earl Clymer Honorable Members of the City Council Honorable Hearing Examiner The undersigned respectfully indicate their support of, and request approval by the City of Renton of the pending application by Highlands Community Church for approval of a rezone from R-1 to P-1, and the issuance of a Conditional Use Permit to allow construction by the church of a Christian Education building. Registered • Renton V ter Signat, re n / Print Name Address Yes No l I/ ' 41.)42 lint ibb arm( . l J t n Pist gig k 16 S. G 12 'd . , C - t ,=' '< < In A a Q A 4, /`r/. rroo L//o/-r s Izz l'e� - � . - I ciI) H?*L , F M4and op 40.E - Iv AIrsSr a'. h .- ice . :Lk!" . 7QTr1e_ l/J? / 'e&+ aido ASS at 1.1 ' ''� 4N1DAr7cN#tcb e-rase_ 1/19 leob Awn)SIP✓NE I, ,< .G- / Zits rirk1A a„7/..&"( 1 A 39 ` ! "��x f w/l 1K f h divt l Yasg1y •N•Si& )C l), Qvl e rovev r'IS[�7esA- ,/VG X Jfr- -��►e;lv►t-v avL CooD e-x_ 413ooNE" se4-0 1 ro M- ' 7L " Aceillim Cm C aedMe- 43oo v a< bus.c4- i L' Q V it er I � (�1 — .1]er�A` R!.Id y a1 Mac. W.Lk I�Jt .O. S.(C. ) 'Se.o tC a sp. 5.c.ert" tet. - J tat c 1 s s E. I'S a''''" PI >'t v f ,,,,, PlARCIOERin. Ste- ii 13 1 Mo ebeR. > . 7.- 444" :a)&Am •4 • , 7), , - / It. 4K.14„1, a der fro S3egrerso N. E. . ' AAh V •e ,k PI. ryef•q Nr / rr�� .� l F- . M'i R3rr0#07 Zell Pr Ns k A 7 fiv I,. 0 CrroZt`e� /y�Z7 /yz" PL$7 .�c <.e ( �� al- /9 C_razi /1,427 / Pi Se. X '` l A of s 4. FA0kr LL Pa MI1 ii- APE. S E. Y 0��,.4, . A.✓d- R nir_k so", 194o2- it y '-1v,e- Jam- '. x 1 i 4 Z3 /2. PETITION TO: Honorable Mayor Earl Clymer Honorable Members of the City Council Honorable Hearing Examiner The undersigned respectfully indicate their support of, and request approval by the City of Renton of the pending application by Highlands. Community Church for approval of a rezone from R-1 to P-1, and the issuance of a Conditional Use Permit to allow construction by the church of a Christian Education building. Registered Renton Voter A.i•�ature Print Name A dress Yes No ittftENE A 41 BA,igitg- /ate I' 4� - C /A/5774 .�,� tf ?S/ .gri-dittriAY# Ctt if!r,C,v • S 4 t C l-it I 12.0 Q 2.3 n/— l a. h p pi hi, ' - 'f�rv' / alr K �0 cb 13421 • 1�,Z„ice i e QA Vive • ICo elSe.V.er...l�v A. 1.314% 456 112rc1 S't b,1 b 'MO-- %temES SS � ' ' = 1374$ S F viz"' sf • K Ka . \na. c Mil IV ,.2s PL. 9�o3 or.,`S L �. ►� w.evw.w..4.1 ‘ Tat, sE 1 Lavd,S\ givst I X- ii • ) • eGLdoi ',. eta_ E, Ladd 47ozfo I11r?4 Ave se ? s$ , Y If .4 3a 4 1 I 1/02C IZ31%Ar,t tE ?gm le f `'ti ��- �t'G15 t'T Il Av5 S 2 2 oS foe Z4q-.. _.�. .___ _-._, ' ' X 16-:11. ,'a l p . /3t> xi &1► 34i1 A/ EA I. A U �o A1�1 �e}cANa FS )SD3 Sr t 12 '. X a /hiem,v /9. S-i►to:a 'a 6.0//2Ts el re. r or .,fie/a' • x 4' I/ JO,g d�c-Fre Der-e 23Z6 NE- In' P/4 Rend >k A "�211:, di I 1 ta. me I d. . 232ta "P1,�' nti, )' I i �o ,, ov6z6:7T/ ;34 b:4-77,72 2oszissE l23gfgr,' cv3 . 1h rd- 14 aft_ri Ity' ,A. Alry e.AT -.Ws: S.4 /443.441 Jak. IP Jac !An ry tJ :4d elle s L t 11 SE/2.4) Re^Ink 0 $ IcZe°1‘.‘" . .,. Tla UZJ ( a 60') 4DS 7/8/9 *pre Art ir4•— .-X A,s . It . ..,,., v, ii le, 44,4 A.N 0 /• __ 0.A.,t,isz.v 4.41 134,0 ••• ,...,...t...,, 0...ge me ,‹ , 1 . . '/ 'i ° Caro ( . F. rausS wog N.1:. e v±+S+-. )( lii,rm.' u' fouled L. Mocteet4 14Ro5 247 L P(. SE X i } { 1$ 1 . „ _, , 1_(0 - • , /3 PETITION TO: Honorable Mayor Earl Clymer Honorable Members of the City Council Honorable Hearing Examiner The undersigned respectfully indicate their support of, and request approval by the City of Renton of the pending application by Highlands Community Church for approval of a rezone from R-1 to P-1, and the issuance of a Conditional Use Permit to allow construction by the church of a 'Christian Education building. Registered Renton Voter Sign ur_a Print Name Address S Yes No j1�e- 1Vilffe /$/L5.f,2/S7'/f.P� '. . ,� iovvcs `1-'2. o oet 116ix s.�. 196z'4$ �?eit 6 .. , r3 1 r;ar► Kter eoo. S>^.'St"' �d ►04 1Gir t yE{'v N �ti, r L. ki'e r S.t1. IVA �.4 i.-to c/ y1 r .�r/.�� NameAt 4Iexa tides si39 s. ie�2 � 5►�, �C • LU•Z �" ES W. IU/ ISOti. �%I �- s.g..1©?'!�pi. �. 1 Lowe' 1'�72(' s �tsc/ c lid L 4-745 a 625V -44 edif f', Zig _doe,/ / PA ti/. / trale,e)fpfgamiose op It �_agLn.._ F. 4/(t.c * �i 0.PI& . I4 o kQ ♦;' $ 0,14 1 j lei cL:VIM 4U•F �lQ.C% n•. . OE AN /11. VN e21801.e. 14114s- OlgisPc sG. ?AO X adA.44 kW s. :PotAVLvoz_ K Wabsktr 14d90 SCISo'M`Tebt4ent °"/ X PETITION TO: Honorable Mayor Earl Clymer Honorable Members of the City Council Honorable Hearing Examiner The undersigned respectfully indicate their support of, and request approval by the City of Renton of the pending application by Highlands Community Church for approval of a rezone from R-1 to P-1, and the issuance of a Conditional Use Permit to allow construction by the church of a Christian Education building. Registered Renton Voter Signature II Print Name Address Yes No Vieva..44 C l LL iar r.;IT c. No lr rin a_n y 3-a_ SKI I l 3 SJ cat o • I.t' ++ �� I4tmvA .o 6 N e+r?rr►M‘, L3 i. S tN Nix" saps , - A ,3•O4SDN S. $41.a t 11131 y Va lley Rd toe". /. mu 42.114.0 Karen A, ivie � gal.•ahc, 162 : l k o iv s.E. • !, 4Aoa n //7. �a rroul /1/4 �Ai ''_Auw► -.101%.Atet.d T;M MmQ.r 1/00z5 .'SE Ism. Ara IP Y, labil .Iw f GQrrrergviarcro A S1d21 Selfen et- S& I . 't 41. . 4L0gg IL//9/ iS l sc�SE 176441 '0O-7 1::: '�f'i a.t Wert v'i 5 `is.�y s•c 3'd°Sy. �e nyF rt ' E_is.d ynor0,1 04 g3M A g '/ e art AA.Socr /4p3 No 36V / 4a.: ✓ , -0 • 1d .`.r Gt,tet.eCiear� /E 817 - /.Z, ?' °i s.>-- 4p00, atV1244 8 s-,z,.vc_ 1510 s. aeopl Sr AAA,'" so;'-' ..- At t QA'tz. &co k 11N44u .50e 44,11.6vi AO Ram V , r4t.„ 0 ` 64 r i a A m elte rsed, 820 71. 7 a jQ..�ar•, t/ „t Ot A Denise Arn c#rrn/'1 Ho/ Sir.mP'ili11N1 KW- • r " S/titAtAt. •4"ittS &rex Co ratds' ?J e-n-Ate{ -v - k4n - V fir h Q eo./'r c'n „ i /fe2/s /77r9ve.Sd�P�i�7 . lr' 11114*MtiOir " IA6.4- me V.. ri- 1 1•. tiAct a `��'�1 ` ar NA- N'OQ AIA-N I'`.'ZS St= 1 2 D. ��a ,.L.. ay 41, %A-s toy P175q .r1 se fr1I. f-.ea `7 of 6 MSm:t I At- 10 CF/7Y P/ Rea6a`Er . .,: ..An.. SMAN c igtDDtNG l'ot'f sr 2.:3p4 P1.-$ Vr,t vy' N ` , E P 1 c Foss rico Suss Ac l 17io t 1/ q t"l' C� ,�► l►l��►, . 1)Q�1�1t �n�1 tl_1�L-�100 �►05' NM" c..► ei. `� 0 i I 24 �T 15 PETITION TO: Honorable Mayor Earl Clymer Honorable Members of the City Council Honorable Hearing Examiner . The undersigned respectfully indicate their support of, and request approval by the City of Renton of the pending application by Highlands Community Church for approval of a rezone from R-1 to P-1, and the issuance of a• Conditional Use Permit to allow construction by the church of a Christian Education building. Registered Renton Voter 2 Sip ture. Print Name Address Yes No I A/1/► "o11w LI,rash., /9 O' se /2 -1Asir / . ,G Ac, - ,„,Li Ph '11(lOmi /,/as-/33 P/a f e t23i l- 0 ei %e. -a 9 E k rt.t ze 18a0 2- rs2 ci AveSE ReAri , X Olw•fv- KAALcu ° ,VI c E. 16/l tiS_ 1 S 3D i5PW c AA* X / 73...6L°A ►�l.}l<Z c7'ao Pe+ i+skq Pit SE l< j/��l �-�b w /�a�-�a rci ;f ���'�ns /40 5?0 s /73 72en7o+, la l LvQ2y b ST;LL 19ioZ S* !32aDPt. Z SOTo.J NA. moo A. SST/1 19/oa ATE L33pe,P, IfeHtoK X ,,. 1.4Aait.e.L 4 .,.,4.7 .Z/? AI s4R6 ,n/T 1y4o iit/LccRccIr/►e 10. ?m c1 F Lo R,,v E. Me- eis' A/ /L/54 t4 N-.L.c./Q,is Yi,s, Al E '` ��� 'bc u tcl C. Moore- /z337 se a37 PC rent ✓' At 11 . t.t.flu S). W 4.. y1� o�37.SFa.3T ' r-k D.Q I f t141 JeA N )bozo KEN t41O7 lWsr PL i XX . 44.444.3 6 -pi fl Crax e20,20 E p',c•titer F V 7S � 16Wv -+ Dc�Wr1 i�l�Yls A101 1,0�1\\1UMC .so. X iir � Ste�r+.h � Newell 14714. /5'+t Ave SC Rem„ X 90 tea.' M L. Sw .% ,VicX30 St. tS Nt for Ii< Ir m ; ‘Pa.-ILS. .:'('L.. Kam) se Ms. 2.4.144... ry k ` . bCM STit01..1SCf-1E/AJ 147iS` ',�1= soto-•► 44(0Qp�..*.M. ` n hG Z L t. S toll 5t+.h+ein N TS' S�E. I�tS'�Ai QQnfar� �% Q Ls� Ke_ok'" Leh...)tis I6.i2S tic Pc. SE ,)t P -' t2.la r L2u�i s r_ 'L AOIS j 4- PLSE 14 e X (tncie Ctrha r�J1 Ila97 /_ 1JS ii p S( "' • &. t7Avir7 tf.L. CA 2N4A+Gotig U(n9Z1 Ps •ft. geNT0t� IX Y 631.0.�•1 La55 L.e r I'II I f' 5.E /35- S7: /�,i, V' • • 25 /r PETITION . TO: Honorable Mayor Earl Clymer Honorable Members of the City Council Honorable Hearing Examiner The undersigned respectfully indicate their support of, and request approval by the City of Renton of the pending application by Highlands Community Church for approval of a rezone from R-1 to P-1, and the issuance of a Conditional Use Permit to allow construction by the church of a Christian Education building. Registered Renton Voter Signature Print Name Address Yes No 4,,,,,/.."(1' (4� V PO . dGto�7-ii Ay�U Sc�-7-- /r /3-%Y�'ti�Ae�'� xr�9h0.4� f/J7� �0.rr�P5 A_ (�man�4t15 5`71 /I/.Gt9, %jE A �`i ' CO,/ vha., �CnaK & A-Irnci, EnRica $S'75 5 l5 ✓!9. '7'7 T4k4ti� 7x I 6,7 ;1.0 Ckayles 4 . Pete,-soy. 14215 se it3o-i apk. ge,„-t0 .98058 44 /h Lr! 0. —4.-0c9—?C.) ��c.tQ C. -sa/1 lq -I S sL (pc) PI .--Y x - .. _ Q,hccy\ iv \-\ok„-Ir I41...c1- . 3 St• 6ntm 80% x 7i i.,.,r , ,, . .4_4 I/4„...4., IA%c.-t F L . Sc,,H LE ME I E1° 2(0067 6 . E_ i s r-res.`i�Q-I 7 -a FcL R, 12.-v_ 4c5ik trc 1< QOU cANr:. '. X01-1Z 14571 se i' St. e-c, �/ )/A n LRR2 t( _v D 1�-SZ7 SE- I g3`�t ST(z[Apw , (-•'I _-P.l�/,�)11 n' < 7Ar a . �1 E / Cr y 7 ( /.,r _0-_, - ,r� (��i //BEN /SGZ. 5 i/�. 57 W h 4�i .�l,l�n,rn� , C�,I es l e��rnmc .4 1302(A E� I RLtth pL kef a��,� X ,� j c PC Poi.- c ( r 9 �, 37,h,( ft, il�a�a 0° c % ' A,6i.s %a, 4a)( 919 N-11 sse, R .Zi• x a v--C . .t�. i Le,.�1a asa1a 36- -mi(k,e S . Ra.04,4e IA , -- •Ai c\rew -PrMhe.A✓ Z'intoa5 Ave 5tn)Cvekiom(A A 1 .-e filt....ge,___ Sli--.eAt-e,y 9 S.F. el p�'c1,`%Yoa r n f A Pr 'T01,$oel GO k I e 5 74902-7 5F l7 T5 5"rkt,arri 9r?L7 f t7ia I/k r/VI/ NO Ji'u /231 a aoa 4f(I I ss .. `,saw ,, f Q mi-At-aa rubes.. �)o ri r L Vo 1�Y1a YV -' Pi )( 10 .11)/4--r4) Pa Co z Pdk'Z WWI S t 1 5' 4- 9II4 • X `(I¢.77, L A U 24 12 -ems o aJ =29o7 /ZIt 7 11 4191 a . „ (AI Y'Os1 ' - <,i- & /3nMe/beiI ° FL&/36e /,Ss-4o6r,40. 5.e.,&//. 984vV A ,/ fi/ic-z-A,2.1> F, rFt AGLC /4.3 ID& �I^AV.. t 9 � X (. \JAM C-i SP/1cr I S`g &Ai°►(dk A- /YJ Rest"%" X'Sir( -f': At-di _ Sa zd on e E-. cs'i,� a/;-- 020ki- rr;,r /04 Cii-�e `054, , . . 9._ 9r > Saci ii J� Si. A 4A /:721- 7 PI S5 xss. X 5:74 z.(rLC- -- c,I�2PCo-- Se_►A 4z�. W./7 e 3 A`//1/:3 20Y ,-e_-5- ,Mil X "f ,Sfi .% 1,-2K,, T /i- , , oK ' . �/.3 n4 ?-e_ r,2 , . 9 25 31 11 V. PETITION TO: Honorable Mayor Earl Clymer Honorable Members of the City Council Honorable Hearing Examiner The undersigned respectfully indicate their support of, and request approval by the City of Renton of the pending application by Highlands Community Church for approval of a rezone from R-1 to P-1, and the issuance of a Conditional Use Permit to allow construction by the church of a Christian Education building. Registered Renton Voter Slanatur ,1 __Print Name I . Address JYes No ,�, ic r 1 3-4/)2 Ed ? Z 0.0 dE Azse-g f /,'-7 Lt A-5e,Pu LIE i ;,ewe,, / ,6EU6ir'Y ieae-75L /</og i o el,,Scr• Be// L ;V r '- --ig ' @d p/ �U7Gjgfr-,/ ._, edi-��s./vx.G q,.c" M/47 ! " .' , SANbpr - 'b. -1i, [- ,! 3-3 l9i-t-~PG S/_ Rs.,,,,5: X 'opdop , %� 4 /AM /y1 / �� 3/ 4 y . / .7U J/tJA l-f UFP 1 tin) 3413 127 Tr-r / j t 1›. .�.0_,rz..-4--) .Ka.r C rk L.L. E.r‘c‘,...so t.) I L ( -.5 1`l y+� Pe 7r� • le p_ )--)9 _FA.)I FC2 C_ hi r-da,../1 /a3o/ se /D'0`'`sy £,el/eiz 1 / .;'' ` e lr- Tah NiNml Soo'►mrpae 1 VAN R-^e RPnla./ )`` I1 1. ti ;'� r ,�Kc `�J/ r.• 267 RJ`—R 'Je- -0>i y ice: i J 0-0, • P r rt' 2St(o- Nlr te-tr ST faals-ot Dl i . d %f/,1 J 1 ND/0 1P rLF1i/A/r /56�b 2Q3 APE st-ire .0 i_D 54 de 0 A iced.- POdeir /3oy Issr�u ir 7 ..e ' G/ 4/ %e6/,//� ( 2� 6LL /,ems-/ oc1'/ 'f sr`/d i X A cO. , �_ r4 f ' �ar/eI?e ar peed/ //�3 —_,Di (eQ(0 — ?C / %_ 07 %i 44' GI�gD.-, ,i, E -. .<xi G �o&,o(o-of- z t -5 > �_ � F� .S7`aL, C'c,ca)i-� S`73.8 w . • 1I, 26 lg PETF: ION • 1 Honorable Mayor Earl Clymer Honorable Members of the City Council` , Honorable Hearing Examiner The undersigned respectfully indicate their support of, and request approval by the City of Renton of the pending application by Highlands Community Church for approval of a rezone from R-1 to P-1, and the issuance of a Conditional Use Permit to allow construction by the church of a Christian Education building. Registered Renton Voter Signature Print Name - Address Yes No /tlI4I Y Cl/ TO6FLEscH /6tri s Ia e64 986,6-9 l�: / R �-- am,4- R a inn P,1 a r ��tp G�evL 1 iSC�(A� c o r4n E e r. On,I P� / 1 �._ 6i MSS 3o'lv k1/4KL 4iJ.7 /,LV A/E -, cs.�� N,- 1�N► L. to i L so k) s 7�►\ - s A► C i�aw��h rn S 910AJAA.tilleit us_ tti54310 l34+6 a Of S ilPt �. MAIZV i. A I-F-672p 18452 sE.. i43rd.5+, otAC I /'1 P Ail)05 02v560 1594 5; v� �� ii/v.-4Tx/LCF1/2_,C;a©. kJ/Ai /75J/Q,s-.A./7or//44PLt /ex 4_4 9.��r �� _ �l�E`Cam'c=�1 G1c .�'9 &?Tiieki 44t d.,7cv Aft 5-e. aF c ,f1 h 6110,0 a /09iF > � (_ ",.;.�� ��7`f i✓ ,i-a &®J L% ion %(e-. S.E. 4'o207 !► caw› c `ems ���z '`2_ • • . .6!° 1 n /7 PETITION TO: Honorable Mayor Earl Clymer Honorable Members of the City Council Honorable Hearing Examiner The undersigned respectfully indicate their support of, and request approval by the City of Renton of the pending application by Highlands Community Church for approval, of a rezone from R-1 to P-1, and the issuance of a Conditional Use Permit to allow construction by the church of a Christian Education building. Registered Renton Voter Signature Print Name Address Yes No I .o u.t Z„, , -1 `Rob&Ir it- IA Fa 7 yze.l) 134/03 1 R t I SPc 5F RetiTovv X 0 a r\A y 41 Ns 133S r? 19/'@1•S.E•(Ranrrovr K f� ' 4f - rc.Nce Sharp-e_ 815 53/srST Re"? A T cruu; Q.,.w aAJI, M M o r r-1 Y\„,- D ew -1-- -7�,3 0 ')7-1 fINa SE 1Z0,40✓1 aP ,,' ✓r J /ariann& Nler'cer /02o?l ,5'C /e'I57` .Po,,.4 /2 x Zip/ E1 ,/ 'r/4/d 'j ,/Ll, &e /29,e/ 5E /44143//I.04,•,. A Gt - ..LA 01( .—,t.1 A • V a K a 50? N•6'• ,S•" PC. Rai)4,n r V 1 (4) iM J PAD 1l y (ID) lsoin 1,r313 /3ylh S[= gar iwL_ e 1 (S rr e• to,�s o n_, /g3/3 /3 4 'SE 12.e444-rrr` w , X �. aPiv) ,( ivy/-- /a"yy/ i1( �r/gac e. wiiv0 7C g ldCL/2-48177o s• GdR )Gr-/7' 64o Alrit bAz S. AEI ffI0, � sc� � � - 1401 1--`f /4. 2/ 151/ 2e22•P/,R '' £ , +a w• ( l ) K/A1ZrY ') NA), 6 cA4-14E A 12 s.'l.9 a. Gi-i rLENT00 *X.ry'ler -_--Clek-ne� Gt/z/C�/yI/YIG A C/lE gr., 1 VA-IVit/74-ff /ay/M , m ct 7Pi. NE. X 3 _-M /5 olio PETITION TO: Honorable Mayor Earl Clymer Honorable Members of the City Council Honorable Hearing Examiner The undersigned respectfully indicate their support of, and request approval by the City of Renton of the pending application by Highlands Community Church for approval of a rezone from R-1 to P-1, and the issuance of a Conditional Use Permit to allow construction by the church of a Christian Education building. Registered Renton Voter Signature Print Name Address es No A - _! ' - ./ -._.._- :— -�/2_i s_X1-• V , Joc Lc_wvi-,c. /2 d// 3,� S 5 / : 0 X _ e.. ." ,, , --?Inbtr\ ---Ata_c -5-k'SikE-C A �:�, a L.d_ ._ /Po 7f a. �.f .A. WV" an...,e` a°+ 4, /37Ys S�U'/4 s.4/o � Gi.�t s ,ir- / (c '--1/ - /me /Lo�/ 5,� 9S,& ;Ft ''// � STDF_ DGQ lS .2 fST . R.1 !,t , .A*/! .: _vim. •i / 74.jiY V�PELT / 5-/0 200-"'` Aye S 'e�j,`roib r_ pia�0 /7,• �n /p�1A /y32 - .may �.� 1) Pr _ IIII_ , f Q/ 47. Z, 56 r.' 7R•h 3G<x)S,-/r��/f�i//r /7,4 B . �r SANdy LS-Fa�.0,f-�- )a�' � )(pi Srt- r % , "� G��ov PZ -57aW/ 7— z94/It --CE / G/ I a If a1 PETITION TO: Honorable Mayor Earl Clymer Honorable Members of the City Council Honorable Hearing Examiner The undersigned respectfully indicate their support of, and request approval by the City of Renton of the pending application by Highlands Community Church for approval of a rezone from R-1 to P-1, and the issuance of a Conditional Use Permit to allow construction by the church of a Christian Education building. Registered Renton Voter Signature Print Name Address Yes No 7 �Co, Attt514Sit )46 � Cat SLKdbLA two MfAil-k-44. el. 5, X M/ .. . EsPe1e41.37.A fki4rc: R it c . 117 1, P! milk X ,D/4 n)hz Le e `7Y b t o rr g i'os--n ./7 . /i� _ v Jo h n TJOs4 D/v /0754� oSE�/p r''a f: /C,-T+L Gr . ,.v , MALe_ 42.4 a A=-I i, � IVAt,� //)6,, /lJ pi)f o.a eri RI �' mil, fie a cci4ire iaoz Al e..o per e Ai"---- v� ,Y: BAR y A kFE llC�7 �/6/i/Y.E7,74 SiV .l t� .t AU v&y. 4.X fit.hrf-Q nefi 3_Al L 2 els - �. C to - r-e f.e. A . /n lb ka.c.._ zor' _ se-- el P/ k ! 'Mr 40 , , P. t l►N e. /i1 a#Xec i/I /64/,3-/oZ66Hi4Uk SE S ,• , /lir 9/ • 7Mo zz nA.A.R.14..EALLI c, ,.,. 4 oa v �T.', aD g,43-fei."�z. ff Al C.r 1 Ka PPES /.5'4.15 55 14/4� Pl. SE or X II( ..?z PETITION TO: Honorable Mayor Earl Clymer Honorable Members of the City Council Honorable Hearing Examiner The undersigned respectfully indicate their support of, and request approval by the City of Renton of the pending application by Highlands Community Church for approval of a rezone from R-1 to P-1, and the issuance of a Conditional Use Permit to allow construction by the church of a Christian Education building. Registered Renton Voter Signat r Print Namrer Address Yes No Roa6.2 ,t-liril /SS`/o se: i'78 Yi-,/ goyF er'e-e c o/r'e1 cSLI/9/c�E. , 50Oa -5%C -.lip .J 447 i- 5r- . Cz7^ /?-3/-7-Sea Wki y/,g0 .59 ` - .!/i27A ,7 A; Ave.ire / vr/,[s./5 AZ/eP i,2cz6.4//c, dedb1 riP X _ , --Ss '1 era r mA P )`?�Y $ /S`i A- SE .�nv 4, K �< l�,- .i 2 . ' AV(D € - aIUaq 'got'.Ave..se Kam+ , /•. ?. evI n J . A)QV-PL z,s-_ !Zb c so jef2,,, _ < V,.C,, . bF- 1 0 YL E, Q a Zg/k a-icos 3 l a-04)pL. sc Ken{- x v ,..•_ /- /wt., ,^-- .D E,,,1 / L, l`7y vs c h 13o z SG /34-Pl, PI I('a071c,, SP X .c� !r1 ,cAelk ). /-le/t rt.i /714 Moms fifes &h4on XY /l i?on e7 176V4 17/6 ^en3 .lie✓5'. A&s.io K Ofr2i l® 3fftilyaN 4-, 7a sac—yVl � c3-1 M6- /(s�10110✓': Q co Z S. C_ }h ( >C le-•e-, ,, rQ pi * 0 _()h�iP c B Drill, /a3o 2«/ ms5 - ' l K • 5 tit 1? 3 PETITION TO: Honorable Mayor Earl Clymer Honorable Members of the City Council Honorable Hearing Examiner The undersigned respectfully indicate their support of, and request approval by the City of Renton of the pending application by Highlands Community Church for approval of a rezone from R-1 to P-1, and the issuance of a Conditional Use Permit to allow construction by the church of a Christian Education building. Registered Renton Voter is atu a Print Name Address Yes No yj J �044ti �/. vicTi� �! ,L®.�M� ifZZ y ,tom /71"" os.rg. •ll �C �� Stet IL. Kfhtp se-►+RDR a'i z AS. '7 at St' Rrkra K4mv A Dsr ►AEg. I4 bi o S6 f oD'E_`l a Re 4I r' ' } 7 ' a .0.4 4 41.. 1.41/rD,9,osrl4yN 1E r /* o se.e%/cc,a. ;Cep ,t feht--114:doi inote re— igb a I Sif#4 l aa /RI2rE1 ,4(A. AI X-ra►e'A- ��ie_S h 1q4(o3 1941 PL.5Pog4„ x.ar . ,Fib S c,rc .�f'vu rwPsw. 3918' WE al S•1 R Iktta Na n ei T hp pSrr 39.11 toe a I 5-&.i"�o� 3ee wakAtoy ' 1 rwt tA.114 I k.� LIsl o tuf...2� LPL. fectodepi anPi - QarniY Amy ,�a,vi_ti 11(915 I1,4 Se AL 5(12F.nf#u 1X • PETITION TO: Honorable Mayor Earl Clymer Honorable Members of the City Council Honorable Hearing Examiner The undersigned respectfully indicate their support of, and request approval by the City of Renton of the pending application by Highlands Community Church for approval of a rezone from R-1 to P-1, and the issuance of a Conditional Use Permit to allow construction by the church of a Christian Education building. Registered Renton Voter Signature__ ,1 Print Name I Address ____ 1Y s 1No L A• �15T 951 NoaKiihm yr, IZE•7024 _ 2r(A.i n.5rn1 101,35 5.5 _ A ) E. c 1 f i e1- IIIIS I 6'L kelltn Ir\g W,lty r% }rasbur CSoI 12arol PI SE i /5mie- 3 hnsoi- cooks- /3tia F- 7c ,W& sr.,Q+M. ri ✓� V Aa/'d p. pcit0. c (3 0t /R( Sf int_ s - Acqt i Palib 1-Nr. , .Pexi�Muh; h &co r arch N.E IP,'\i► t%' I^v c.L., fie,V.-i'v►vt 7 1 13 3 5 r 'S, SSi77 ref,UJn 4,t, mAievete,f-- 9,5), /LS;,Etesem6.11(j C . a 7`l fene Fo55 111'15 1501/4 Five S, Abli , • lc . Fa5S l? 8 S I (!Pr SE &r EIPX _ G-fGsta Al, L.E.SL 2a-/-3 • Z° as PETITION TO: Honorable Mayor Earl Clymer Honorable Members of the City Council Honorable Hearing Examiner The undersigned respectfully indicate their support of, and request approval by the City of Renton of the pending application by Highlands Community Church for approval of- a rezone from R-1 to P-1, and the issuance of a Conditional Use Permit to allow construction by the church of a Christian Education building. Registered Renton Voter to e Print Name Address Yes No tm 414 Ar ,drP, races ZZS MAYvvick S /kv je Vi GO//a c/o no5.f. f N//f / i eh4A 4.*x 1•49MC5 A to(1.8 ER - / 13g 5 e I lWrff PL)Rama,-. ��VUULU �✓t 514.I I /2o3S zo(, PI_ ,E Gs s4XvGl.� !/ � � Na,eing.v A' °P,9m/ Y3a8 Su c/5�7 Bu/vN� R ,�t/ `�nR y fl Po TTs /? /i'N d L• DUVALL 162Sc2 iloi Sr Ave SE R.taaangy ✓, ``\\ D K L/kNpD F. t J S cj'z✓-.1— r S a �G= ✓ AVM F o \t' . GId-0I 953(13 t37.N 1,k0E-S.6 Tee wrau41110 • 12 44, PETITION TO: Honorable Mayor Earl Clymer Honorable Members of the City Council Honorable Hearing Examiner The undersigned respectfully indicate their support of, and request approval by the City of Renton of the pending application by Highlands Community Church for approval of a rezone from R-1 to P-1, and the issuance of a Conditional Use Permit to allow construction by the church of a Christian Education building. Registered Renton Voter Signature Print Name Address Yes No . ` liVogA %n(JN i9�.��'sC ✓,�I(et2d s _ w�/it4s'f (,tgEf) P. Laitd9 ttatilH' I`ll Pl S `p•_. • // ��,1) : A. XgV1�t/ 4r/4,// 433JS. /f/ : / , .�., . /may � 6h11,lbrl IS. Ljahnsorl ogas ,204/91SE- E5s . ZoN O V. b.* 't,E ri. J41o0 se i1.3ue Rei .�v v" ./P144. i 'nJt :Sy Ivt a:". Li o r' IL 315 atAion vQ.5SU-1 Iq ✓ 7 PETITION TO: Honorable Mayor Earl Clymer Honorable Members of the City Council Honorable Hearing Examiner The undersigned respectfully indicate their support of, and request approval by the City of Renton of the pending application by Highlands Community Church for approval of a rezone from R-1 to P-1, and the issuance of a Conditional Use Permit to allow construction by the church of a Christian Education building. Registered Renton Voter _ Signature - Print Name Address es No ' Glha f% ' 7/4014 Er L v Itp P i Woe s.F ia)a sYW# ,Il,'K 11k11. , . 7Mot , 0101aer [ � eAft S,k,we!) unim Ave /: - .r =ever Ai Des u i`e . 14'1 I t we. 2.4 t ,c.� beat,' Buzar/a (CS7 Ille d&I Aft.Se' PETITION TO: Honorable Mayor Earl Clymer Honorable Members of the City Council Honorable Hearing Examiner The undersigned respectfully indicate their support of, and request approval by the City of Renton of the pending application by Highlands Community Church for approval of a rezone from R-1 to P-1, and the issuance of a Conditional Use Permit to allow construction by the church of a Christian Education building. Registered Renton Voter $!_ ionature _rj : Print Name ) Address es INo _r ...,V, CIA41- _ ( PALL Auld)/ 1,t/ Ly,vivdeP libr‘Jrz, x . _ _,AW,L--/Fiv .YeLizedfotd,f A U51_1", SE /// el.S. L:�4 'llvt if&t tiV tl ,Vfili eiv .Zara 7 4.7 3 /'l Se ATA/r. 0( . (A��- - ��ii4 ,E. - Z. tqo c -) ./(4)36/6/c-SE/c�s°n'/ii� �( d �cJ .�' po NNA- T3 ueo.S,[�/� /(� 1 !'�?a,v�eOE UE,'� " 1C I 3 1 q 2`] PETITION TO: Honorable Mayor Earl Clymer Honorable Members of the City Council Honorable Hearing Examiner • The undersigned respectfully indicate their support of, and request approval by the City of Renton of the pending application by Highlands Community Church for approval of a rezone from R-1 to P-1, and the issuance of a Conditional Use Permit to allow construction by the church of a Christian Education building. Registered Renton Voter _ Sianature .1 Print Name I Address JYes INo I gg_th-O /3&_a_c____.. 3 �=// uft* X yevii r aa4 l � CEP , J 332. Oyv ll NE(rOS %As Let �#0" • S 30 PETITION • TO: Honorable Mayor Earl Clymer Honorable Members of the City Council Honorable Hearing Examiner The undersigned respectfully indicate their support of, and request approval by the City of Renton of the pending - application by Highlands Community Church for approval of a rezone from R-1 to P-1, and the issuance of a Conditional Use Permit to allow construction by the church of a Christian Education building. Registered Renton Voter Si ture, � 11 Print Name Address Yew No flc.IUF Y k c.,t. 1 VI k E 441-EA/ /4►a D /433VE 3E ,� / . e 14, / i . /�I' /r I5 (L /S o E"SellP" t ,21L1 144// 01 'I .e)48".g et 393a• A411 J yr- 4447, _ 0. � e,e.w L 0.A'I ' /�1' � . 4.d< Jit: • o 7er 5a _n / S / e5/ -/?4�txS&du\ .. r ./E��2y STELA, �6% �5E lS�fPt.,5SS . ✓ // •JJi Je H,,fe r 1-(:1� 1332 Lir va.l'! IVE lib-LIZ v/ "/! h Iht Lud.re4i .. (larlInv► /1575S15r peg. s1- & ,%!� " A.Je M .Titer p., y 7o2 4 !)Ne S A'P ..� ,,,, ,,,,,/ ///,(me z.-J-7,&4'1V4.J / -A Sc. vI +_ /7 ,e0 A' O -z-/ ,Z : ////� .sg / ,,oi /�i�rrzv✓ I e it.i. C..ClAEZ- 4-. #t 4elcY2 /llb7 J 3, C— Re-,,... '— -•.. AZ....., )I L M. Wfl.Sciv J72/.1 .S. -/..2P77ei O ` C • • t; " - or (, 5 3l PETITION TO: Honorable Mayor Earl Clymer Honorable Members of the City Council Honorable Hearing Examiner The undersigned respectfully indicate their support of, and request approval by the City of Renton of the pending application by Highlands Community Church for approval of a rezone from R-1 to P-1, and the issuance of a Conditional Use Permit to allow construction by the church of a Christian Education building. Registered Renton Voter Signature Print Name Address Yes No Ie- // aT#Ft .4ao RE /o2r 44h .4 ../14 - K_ goNAI.-t) L tCf /404-A aESTIEeilAVE ME ✓ Li r l2o/r /?G—Any S40. ,gx .� • S r. A". Pao./ R 112-A1A swA�+ rehdo. 1 4LVAEf2 )$�2d E 21 ISSAbtvAHvr saint/ 3)/9`6-ele___ h n A' // 41.r" in#07"c IN/4 + tth Ls a M 72,2 s e. /.2d16 • gib` X. 32 PETITION TO: Honorable Mayor Earl Clymer Honorable Members of the City Council Honorable Hearing Examiner The undersigned respectfully indicate their support of, and request approval by the City of Renton of the pending application by Highlands Community Church for approval of a rezone from R-1 to P-1, and the issuance of a Conditional Use Permit to allow construction by the church of a Christian Education building. Registered Renton Voter nature Print Name Address Yes No t � - o/ l`�d Lh 'c-�le 37/ 4 Se-= /j-S/ ✓ to 33 PETITION TO: Honorable Mayor Earl Clymer Honorable Members of the City Council Honorable Hearing Examiner The undersigned respectfully indicate their support of, and request approval by the City of Renton of the pending application by Highlands Community Church for approval of a rezone from R-1 to P-1, and the issuance of a Conditional Use Permit to allow construction by the church of a Christian Education building. Registered Renton Voter Signature 117rint Name Address tYes No t C i ► Cpt6- CaQ0 4'I I $E /q3/m 5T Ies 4 A, j/., $4i 6A cNg' . . . /9 Ar I, L 'a,ks' COiyi4_ , SS X ' : ,, i , � . A I„44L*' �s'_ 1?t,.�rriff / - n , I , . , '�,,N�' L. L t�w a I�iros1 i/oa I X - iS a, zr t- 4 S Palrn.er' ono $E 170t1 L x< . 'Slue '4 . 11(45 At E �P'P1 Kok( x' ' s '1V • avrt 0•Mea.l1 01 101 'SC t '. x6[.)g•u L. RAIQTL6, liSo %4A.I,ic7 Etiois lE71Da X ehere ' h';'' T re,...k Ql14 S 7r' gam t q.V°&LSE V 3Y PETITION TO: Honorable Mayor Earl Clymer Honorable Members of the City Council Honorable Hearing Examiner The undersigned respectfully indicate their support of, and request approval by the City of Renton of the pending application by Highlands Community Church for approval of a rezone from R-1 to P-1, and the issuance of a Conditional Use Permit to allow construction by the church of a Christian Education building. Registered Renton Voter _ ianature , Print Name Address �IYes No , GC'_ �_.._/__!�L ../. _.. /✓-/�C1!-l__ _ __. /�� / X Cameror,�L. ,Ss . _..._ 10?/7 l2_en:?L- . _. _ 1V Se 7 ) .ft -/-74---7 -1.- - e— :,,Eil.A f .i� _ .-_..o....�. c,.„ S feu ek fop Liey,'�4x,�1�'• 7027 S, (2 .tk St > f 'm , -S-fr -c c' \ -e a c o c lC l 7 S(Z`i 1 3 �i=g J A_S .¢,4 can , uQ. , ci,ic:c Vx-thiQ A Scappnir las15 13% a�,e S Q.rtL ? • )t / .!✓ job. �J��i?� .r C'rt,A ).1, /.z�/.c iT `.A[.c /1 r�/i/nx 7, A LPf VI ,ffiio1 c..rr jI Q sL iti $t ,K ll 4� 1 :, .L_ , ,i .' ri - L , A `- . /' A.- `�N 1- - $ LL, Unp__Nri.\MOnaSdti %I- 13 . acm ea_ Aa wL ffir' „uL W111,mow. (.Bill ) T!-ovncaci K/3 N. r1`fi{'S-{: p -�ov. r/ lit at k Po rje-`1 /tJo k rt la„cjdoe/t/E/2e44 X_ $i�t-an T�' . 12365 SE 2/ S- tad- X CJ 1 "r,koI go LM s /6'//7. '6 t!3'-1' <--11,a , raal X J ' Jenh% kr I4aA r- eS 14I,,1"1 S. .. 1131-k l ..1 X ill de /g (7 35 PETITION TO: Honorable Mayor Earl Clymer Honorable Members of the City Council Honorable Hearing Examiner The undersigned respectfully indicate their support of, and request approval by the City of Renton of the pending application by Highlands Community Church for approval of a rezone from R-1 to P-1, and the issuance of a Conditional Use Permit to allow construction by the church of a Christian Education building. Registered Renton Voter Sianature _ .. Print Name Address 1Yes 4, IP • /rd.:v_!6/a � (`1 �P/+�G q 5✓mil N �_ rlil pPLG 6-ATE .2/�33 S� G 6�� f L/dly4/�%a7:va.4 k M NIE Ater11J b& w)►u�a.pi_ Nt g►rwJ }( ,a? , Over-mars .27,2o ,sz /fve'. aC;. 406g sr o/ i/ LA/Voliall% - USA OVg MACRS Z-7ZO I32Nv cite.5.E.5100 �(J • • 4 1 3� PETITION TO: Honorable Mayor Earl Clymer Honorable Members of the City Council Honorable Hearing Examiner The undersigned respectfully indicate their support of, and request approval by the City of Renton of the pending application by Highlands Community Church for approval of a rezone from R-1 to P-1, and the issuance of a Conditional Use Permit to allow construction by the church of a Christian Education building. Registered Renton Voter 4 _ Signature_ .I Print Name I Address fres INo u163 Lowder1 ICI C1ti,. -N'kit;c �. 1 S-fr0c ` gal L -4 -f '{. 1/iH lao 1,ar I101 K1F, Carx�Id�Pk-In l , .72D e 4 w.,4 ,f rI1-r/2 ii4e0 1-9Nocv2- , •• WD i v A 0 K /lfC Lt AyC (c oly r UU '' dui +1tftp°-4^ pi R.7) / N ,f J N S I`.3" M IX /4 M 15 RI //S A✓.G 7� ]�S / I'2 -t M L1- i -Dori 11/Ic h I 63in E Lk K.c a vtOrSE / .JA/ -F�ee.e e /N"/ayO i- /0a7,5.31 e4 7 J X Ru.n cJ 1<i41 e--Xi f'., ITuatie iAJ y /4{7i-bmoNos nlx.,e t i Sl a_ 1/4_ ?orH A. POST6.l2 20-70.10 S-1- .9ECSS£s 6 -4° 67_ r 1-y 1-3 IJ r r i // 16(01- / .34aacu 51yxq. ,1'F 3 9 1I 37 PETITION TO: Honorable Mayor Earl Clymer Honorable Members of the City Council Honorable Hearing Examiner . The undersigned respectfully indicate their support of, and request approval by the City of Renton of the pending application by Highlands Community Church for approval of a rezone from R-1 to P-1, and the issuance of a Conditional Use Permit to allow construction by the church of a Christian Education building. Registered Renton Voter . Sianat e _ . . , . _______Print Name l Address __ IVes IN o Jr ' - - t — - ---- ---- 26-Q4 -- -- --- 16_..91,,cdke SF 4111." - Z��c� _ L-ys,i� �I.z 33/ s 07oL-/ k T ` I ' l LrJ $ aCx ' 0 1333 Se- ! — r-e-n- " V + �_ \ ..C.Q.oi., 1tr_t -r-i. 1Ce,n ruin .C.(O..I ( til(Q no,odder-1-- ,n Ciii) />A .cT - //? /9(44 /6g-7. S F AVMiu' r. f .a." ,5, ka,fit.y ?VA)S'a r 2, 3 S'3 Al,E,/V r4'S7 ,��,,,{1 ,/ ,1 1�' -btu— Kv►e-,Je_ tacg43E' t(4 I Sr, £ r ) ,% iii a. 7na;,t r bct,rn a. M t 15aoU SE HI , 7, Pyrion c o.eA C C etc- S)Lc i62P i s'Z i 7 401i t iz ,, , t_ 2-ot-ill`�` Kew .1/ t►o2A7 � a � 123y,6 �� `� T46 Nf e-e-�N to OD 6 !/Y7a1ple #! 0' ► v! M / c4M c. 1 MS 33o S. Sr�+ PL. R,EA oA). 4 „t"-- , _ . ,_, ,, n� . E• S/ c ..-5- 05s, a �k.) `kQ • �Q. l<4DI--R VM A., 1t4 S E !A G/3[ 145/5 SE)39'/3/ /re/tte,,, KCI e - Dr a L. Ai ke,a., a1/34 177011- 4tie, MEN A44.. t/ 1=gl6 I.rAN4Ro /4950 /Lli'iott 't , 'rt a. _04. b_ JaA.-ES 115 Limo hyr L/ *3 ✓r et fir J7M/ //5 4104, /( d3 A. c?e-ri /19r� e� qla. gf S P/, V •+ C.s ('ate c311.4 c4xNf1 &121,5 5r- va04- PL. Ra vrl-t}n O v • f `0�.,,z, A\\e, .$U (,,rs,,,,_, 3G o4, rnew)u.-- Ae e-, iv If 20 1 � 2S PETITION TO: Honorable Mayor Earl Clymer Honorable Members of the City Council Honorable Hearing Examiner The undersigned respectfully indicate their support of, and request approval by the City of Renton of the pending application by Highlands Community Church for approval of a rezone from R-1 to P-1, and the issuance of a • Conditional Use Permit to allow construction by the church of a Christian Education building. Registered Renton Voter y�' Signat a Print Name Address Yes No .Pend iDeuttt NA. Sw4,f4k 13e* AI 2 *ik Rt4&k Lpattl ' 6_4J Nan y A.V, 11)Q • ett, !folio 7r_ tythPt. r X WittiZAGS'nr Cif(t Is NXAN /31 ps tilI NOP&ii4 1t PeaqW4). N& Iv J u ry 3o4oS.6 ' „ ' ►' �a..Iti�Fc t $ I`• &&ask 20B1JQshook Ake SE Re..40A l/P1IAQGES ,. Com•agab lib2 s ,1� 1200• �.. /1?/,`l2`-� .�,g dese l'Zla/7 /G Ic 30Nde SCf.� P/ X �IY I f 1. 1 Ssoh /v�L/Lf �/• rlS.� ,�,� S/ // 7;••.'#kg L- . ,e(e.. IO(ett IcrelcLA if Avf sFftioo, ,Alrs' ,, , ',/ • WA V A�. � t soy *37t7 k)a, +1k S�F L. .41.�Adati.�oAfiUsear! .-VI? .tJ�C - Sit'^ r' til mit ill? �..` :' a t,A�c LEA seorr- ,� i . r�ntgy y ��1 w '% r +' r Nr4v1le G/OILS 3✓ 170$Cgr�as AveA/E yr a� 'tik, II' >� �/ :9 u w, .s. . ss. �4�1t� �t3R S� lftl � �-�_�Y i�J'� .`t•e+P g2 , / ' %RltooD Ir2. • Co owed- 1,5�t S &Ambit V .i 4A wy A , A41sw- / 27?L/7/orPI.._/ii qi v Pi ( � / l"i Ql gal A. Tavr �7 11 //Lola SSE 9/o Rya , ' - 1,". tilt ,nqe3 09Q�nsl ✓)( I�i I. � `-v H 1 i i f I t �'. Le) , s M u 1 n pool 5 148 ' `ems, e '= z- C Li�� 1A.4-Con RS IaL21 [3) Ava Sty 9 S'o '? �`t?�-r-- �"� ..�F��%_l'!►`7'''1 . '3+�,�l Sv 4,,,..-t.44,... /N l�a&I €e I � I/4/ NE'G,*.,.../..�P1V.,. 44t-- . �.1 oils ` . «e.b.e4n $ kn orkso \ tqzsz...ttio44t.sP. clettet X - 7 �,4Md, CA.,,,AA.-, 3744 SO c 1 ... 51r/9& [i lrf .A' #Al-A% 1rre $oN / ,l�' I :�,n rix,, 17 en16i 1r` AdGY /A;9 •\ l/Z M 571 >y 4:- Qi'�►, _a rD( /r/ Ii /''/ /S7 p�•S Lam. ", �- , fzu V o U1i... I te s2i S er /4 3 S!— X G ,j,, I Jr"' i,�rt rtwp�vg0-- 12lic , /N 0a, SG VT �' / cif.-k /yoa/le alod MIo$ n 0 '4o?o4a v.. . ' . �4.c�n o, L Se�tr n tt� Oas4wv. Atm SE_ !rer-�t% 477r• - ° L W of 'na rola _'. Farrel I (- SO .. aerrt R ` , •/ ail 33 3? PETITION TO: Honorable Mayor Earl Clymer Honorable Members of the City Council Honorable Hearing Examiner The undersigned respectfully indicate their support of, and request approval by the City of Renton of the pending application by Highlands Community Church for approval of a rezone from R-1 to P-1, and the issuance of a Conditional Use Permit to allow construction by the church of a Christian Education building. Registered Renton Voter .Si natu - Print Name Address Yes No / • f�v i�'t YOU t913 t s.E• W1a ��I( y e �d Nr 4 ZD6/0 tPES U e0- .1600 Si Ri��y l' '?gyp', , Do b► iLD 11. % ¢vsraK '12 t%$NNET ¶L'4PN.r. 4.- 4 �'• . sk den a Mad�te iDP 5�,f2 t a Fftff pry c/ � a.1D rhil,g+ehSGM 13hA3 SE. I�,ll as 10 Xi 1;.. ., ,� fii`. •�.• ' , !feoL 0.40-t POOLL- Ilion IbAAO p.1,l�SG—Zr ytiro.K,r ti/ '� KrNMilk S t %-t 14 5- ViksNo�t VE Scl 1y r�J' 7 / = A Nom r /4kcsson 20%NO Z3 . Rsntos+ X ' �/ -rt.2A Qo A N weNb�cz4.1k P\ Q�.r trrw• X ' Ld .41 a h-2. ILL/O ArApa v rX,rC.0�$�P1'pvar446 /'` , A. Fo wA20 A. ScHULY•r 1b15Z SE 14<e1n PIIReUuou V� 4 la- A • bta-L-• a a a t coati ' t.e.- pit esT ir v era+.. z ' . ' z3Avlo 1= SAQeoe•K 13445 SE 141 ST y l�ri brat a' +s<.>aRT 191,410 S C. 4 sa•rh sr ✓'l A / Sharrer% %LarnhR ,J4/43lid! W Sr V- ' ! W4/t/, vs /S'o?F+!_lde. ;a di. `` erewrtLi O. ,ir(p�IAA t✓ 1 St u.� Sc 43 ST. v' " r . Ttwterky Q. Sekweunre.s Ro 29-iLse I. ,E' V' . /i• k '. f t,t"j�t, lwool SF t itti Or Pi 0. i 14w-teK y O . M ei,r 24414 %IX 4k C r s e 01 40441111. *f I r e I i t-=A- �Alk1 0o�..i inpeG l:p CGpw,a,s I Ie�.7.1- ) 7 A og. A� ®, Q !' , 1 i C-h, - E. *a: 110so Itetliotat+e - ./9-I2 J w '11 ... . w.lte(ill, .4 ..._ , pry . _ ' • A' II' 'A�. V' I 'i , ( ' t,:,, 4 I i.S A- ri- 230S 7,4 c#. ri Ari►.- V N ,4IV Ckd& IA) 5")3./wr seh/IT it/o: V .. ,... „A ,.. „,,,,,„L, �,p • /- teZ csAIV, 1 SE lit S� 1?-.c V Jon. WitrEiHr Mgt? /S7°"PL. Sr P.e101 f/ CA2Y L. l; .pM4i p 741.9, i3rl Pi SA. t A V —�.0 .kL oet-�-Ll t. 1 -A KLt S i '7O S /7 ti'C#,Pe k t� . . j'oc,q A. $Ltl5 WA141.1.St!' a S.E MgV..ti, . PI MotAxball• ) a_rb m i 1.308 N.21(1 'Ru,inn,'l11osb r/ 1141/ 33 _ 40 PETITION TO: Honorable Mayor Earl Clymer Honorable Members of the City Council Honorable Hearing Examiner The undersigned respectfully indicate their support of, and request approval by the City of Renton of the pending application by Highlands Community Church for approval, of a rezone from R-1 to P-1, and the issuance of a Conditional Use Permit to allow construction by the church of a Christian Education building. Registered Renton Voter ilVture, I�Prin Name ) Address Yes No a... /a.rl lYe L. eta+ /37,p3/ Se I' F 1- OP ✓ ha.- FRar.sces kA. A*a.uorroM 9'42 xr3.t,rt., n.A, 'ri . • a... 1.,a n_oe.,, tM . floah /S4St5E. l4841, z.14 ,.Ai". . �Y► i y cll11 00 NS +' Si— LT► " 1 �. r T3r1•' Cietil 9 19744 SE 1 ti.C6A PL !/ *•i 13.64, pi L4 a KGO C;til 45L•4N AYE Af'Lr A--- Vi 44Q Mwle;e 4. -cif ,,EAvs /mod/ P.S.E'iouti,a/mac 1," .1-..- TA wits rrde b. ST€/e.✓j 14 i i q' s c /0.0 /VAe F ✓ 1=5DAn e•We1/i 0Z.V9 4i'1 fJ e r2/ire, M. FM/AC �vrlAta4 S.L . 4/sf�s7.D-lor / r A UafeliV _ D scosalsw Ia-z�n r y Ph.&v.e. s/ , , U e� le+' 1'cf/a IP6,4 Oil1ak Ave 'Nab ✓ fEL 15. FAa¢ELG. 8ZI1-'/4 dk.s, I/' �7 fi P,'/ A- "dl 0i ,r. " e ANDO. 50 le 4oe Sodas �2 iv 341. ',9 PAULA Cadv6y /f0g34 i��►gwti I. 1. ,I�� inAse . V 17L ive 13Z II -19 �'i.�S.F,I V - 1:‘p G xf -I ZZ"4�' Sr , labrit-LtilLiLLads, 142o SE 14q� an�o-�, yr y :,,I ;, ;, _ W (s./ Q c • Oil -46,c P L tub (ke�..�didr 7 V ,yil '1'/' �� �L A.m.(,0I.G.is acm,27 bg/a--1st a.h. 1., A i . AreiT NZ Shwr2"L 21317 Se. /lo'� rst tom'" i ' , RDitI l �P PAvc /ZOG3 �s��/,4uJ.J?A) �G ' it Ir ,�='- fAY '13IR Dtc /l/ IC/AY $Czf3AD$1 . F• �' `. iftr'1* ,=� u sar\ b t �.e-fz... �f 3!7 s.�. /V7 9- . � � i/ f! i9 V I i^ 4 /J c c K/cc�� ��o e. r?``' ./ C r ,Li• I'l (1IdYeL Il, Wot1 OBO (2-) Y? (, '., : p , `4 Pae.�' '{�u, 1v1 , �1Ji l l r) 3U % , t27 — P�. k z. ff,t0eArA•7? goo 3.1..),/.. „ei.r. -;:- rg..4 .1.407 .,errs ivIA e. frNn �Rhs.Ie, /44d 4d /417'� P'�.�r.� '�S I * 13 __ it1 PETITION TO: Honorable Mayor Earl Clymer Honorable Members of the City Council Honorable Hearing Examiner The undersigned respectfully indicate their support of, and request approval by the City of Renton of the pending application by Highlands Community Church for approval of a rezone from R-1 to P-1, and the issuance of a Conditional Use Permit to allow construction by the church of a Christian Education building. Registered Renton Voter a /,�. Sionna_ture III .! ��t _ Print Name Address es INo I , -Q / h geggvoi L36104,/)6/szt,a5tx. x ' ___.___.._________________ . .. , V I IV,r� �'o��s I/VS/o dd.( $r:J3t X �•��s I n�Ti�. J 0.r�o r e- /y i - . - C N. 3 '' x ems. A / 4. Z - ,€91//4 /9. .rre.4. /zzzy sG s/43 ' sr. 'F .71:1? �"'--, 424e�7 L , fe,i zzc /) / Yo /9/rt oC s£ xgv?on - ,, .ti•�«.-s.ti E Ic 1 �. �+n,ME(Z 4 J BB 36 De .4L •4Wj. >E4-r+ 7� �� dal A �/v���Ps rl i'9 5 /teaZ-1/R, S ej°" . e—akr-i-k M.IlvlldleSTc.... 64;tM . N. &cid/Gs1-cvA_ /el4,w 1' -'a.-b4--,oi._ S_ RQ"dc" ` + fire .t 3 Lt4 .J Tp,ie/0 .7'_ I-jveillo.�r�h iq ll03 127 P1 SP .e% -9 ,G�Gu 14, 1 d e / l'C ` Ce r,,,,,. !C l .3 /9 '1 rr / c 4 �! /71 dt �S�E _' . 7,2( eC C/.�C .Z.g� / lP /YQ f�rlG < /df S549 l"7✓F/�6f/S.E: _ J 4,4 .� Oro 'G#'.'q 4 De J 9z1 . Z$"?,t- ' imru fro 63od / e .i /�ratcG flu./colin7 OS/ /1r.,r,:vir c. £.- Aii /` li/ M/4N.9*-t/44,47, /3 s3/.440 .r /41r�d'., X Of lC/s9 l zs'asl3�,SE //3 • 'lat., G 5i9P C /&.(fD �l� 2Z3o _2 k-4n W —NC a _Z. rI) l o N o p- R e,e r) 'z z-3 a T RAYA CD •t• IOC k &ARC SN1E,PelZ. ,,d G-Ale-L S,.Nr01�Z. `/3 52. SE z_i1TTf- 4-3 - 111-. .72.Aorg-r Set tide r /i 35aSE a114-hy A'S/3 MT X ;jg1 -e9 rlG S v 1 Th (35�a c' /kc://, # 1, /; x / AD G A BNTO - 4�3 FF RNd A I•e e.i R IL J E. it " �J/" J`fI��SSo� Apo ("). 144a.\.. fed 1Wte . i; G A`t Nlas N g.,R-K ' ! r o s- /l10 3 Y.S19 geAn.- -i 110 << rr,►►v1 it4t 14e.ri 1 Sr 4-s'i 5. •Z.1,31' A N e.. Seel tt'!-e, �---).-e/.1, m q 1 v'T.i &a.i f e ,�,s's'$Roa0sa v tv* V A�� .ram , ' 1c. - I Si -S t75 n,tN-� rair-ic ia_ A-.. 5nv- i (p 75 4 _a-e.,71E' . Sharai hi, IeJ.l y30)T NC�aiidCA x-e/ j , ` le AU lie i 1 41I3Z 7 itiO eel' Cr Re,vliw , X Q �6 t 11 taine41. �u,r'c,�(I 33a5-5E 16.4z PC. (2c6i40,.. . .: - St tt- t V- f i-1 2Z3ts 12-5 't't $C— t T L/ 1 (83 33 ���r������'T� i��������� � /� / � . �����/��� ��� ^ �- L�� �� �~7r� /'�� - ' ��- EXHIBIT 8 SIGNERS LOCATION BY ZIP CODE VS RENTON RENTON OUTSIDE AREA - ZIP BY ZIP TOTAL SIGNERS ADDRESSES OF RENTON BELLEVUE: 17 17 98004 2 98005 2 98006 12 98007 1 ISSAQUAH: 49 49 98027 49 KENT: 37 37 98031 32 98032 1 98042 4 MNTLKE TERRACE 1 1 98043 1 RAVENSDALE: 3 3 98051 3 MAPLE VALLEY: 8 8 98038 8 SNOHOMISH: 2 2 98290 2 PUYALLUP: 1 1 98372 1 ' RENTON: 533 98055 42 39 3 98056 182 164 18 98058 124 20 104 98059 185 36 149 SEATTLE: 55 55 98103 1 98105 5 56118 1 . 98133 1 98136 2 98146 1 98166 4 98168 5 98178 22 98188 10 98198 3 ' OTHER: 5 2 3 98225 1 98558 1 99163 1 NOFIND 2 TOTALS: 711 � AS PERCENTAGE EXHIBIT NO _. .2 __ ITEM i r` C U ' VO ' 9V';; SUMMARY OF BUILDING AREAS HIGHLANDS COMMUNITY CHURCH RENTON, WASHINGTION JAN 5, 1992 EXISTING BUILDING: 000 LEVEL 8,770 S.F. 100 LEVEL 17,289 S.F. 200 LEVEL 16,400 S.F. BALCONY 966 S.F. • TOTAL 43,425 S.F. FOOTPRINT 22,665 S.F. PROPOSED ADDITION: 000 LEVEL 6,697 S.F. (43.3% OF 000 LEVEL) 100 LEVEL 6,697 S.F. (27.9% OF 100 LEVEL) 200 LEVEL 375 S.F. (02.2% OF 200 LEVEL) TOTAL 13,769 S.F. (24.1% OF TOTAL) FOOTPRINT 6,697'S.F. (22.8% OF FOOTPRINT) TOTAL BUILDING: ' 000 LEVEL )15,468 S.F., • 100 LEVEL 23,985 S.F. 200 LEVEL 16,775 S.F. TOTAL 57,194 S.F. FOOTPRINT 29,362 S.F. CITY(,- e.z.;' oiv FEB 0 7 1992 CU; R— o' zYO ,•. 7) ExHIBI �_ a. w_ ., 3 RESIDENTS OPINIONS - LATE HOUR NOISE FOR ECF:R,CU-048-90 Sheet/Choice (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) as 9 4 bb 3 2 1 cc 1 4 1 1 dd , 5 8 ee 13 ff 1 ag 7 Totals 1 3 30 11 7 9 0 1 RECORDED OPINIONS - LOCATION RELATIVE TO NEW EXPANSION Sheet/Location (a)North (b) NW (c)West (d) SW (e)South (f) SW (D)East (h) NE as 1 3 7 bb 5 1 cc Not rec- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o r'd ed dd 12 1 ee 13 ff 3 DO 7 Totals 12 0 1 1 8 7 24 0 CHOICE LEGEND: (1) 7:00 PM (2) 7:30 PM (3) 8:00 PM (4) 8:30 PM (5) 9:00 PM (6) 10:00 PM (7) 10:30 PM (8) 11:00 PM 1 \ OPINION EXPRESSION LATE HOURS NOISE FOR ECF:R:CU-048-90 To: Hearin. Examiner. City of Renton: Reoardino the request for an extension of the allowable time for noise in connection with subject proposal, I wish to express my opinion reaardinq any allowed extension. My own preference for any extension is: Cchoice] (1) 7:00 PM (2) 7:30 PM (3) 8:00 PM (4) 8:30 PM (5) 9:00 PM (6) 10-:00 PM (7) 10:30-PM (8) 11:00 PM My home relative to the expansion is: (a) North (b) NW (c) West (d) SW (e) South (f) SE (g) East (h) NE Choice/ location I Printed Name I Sig ture I Address I ZIP I Date f____ LLoYD (4©514-lDc azZ��• i c'5' l2e_L--/J I-e%IG, /6l%0' o --/G-F- ' 4-r 1 c K C L- e. t% 83v r,�CL.eNv ickee:_,4,0:!:-.. • yr.0 S--& c:: -1 3 -919- - LI"' F e2',1.1) „St) .,&4.,-:-rE 'UL-eil- 3- F i- ,S � 2.v 6 B S Or ._ gy#_R iA L9/1/c1-adE. 1VE iga_-_ ,-1,3- 2 .5-- \tea NoN D boqq,( E --/. .. __ _. fi.,, i ?I cikuo,0,eei4d 1/1 4- L 4--.?-A---tvs-Y1 N .4.tA 3 C 09' N p- (i 5i Dg6 g-1 E 9 ---- 3 (" .t_) /. .ve s,A) ./ fe,,:ege-rt._, g_L`LCf,ez(GsNN /fJt-oVG= ?0,°'0,77 2 -(3--? t 2 . /,a /.1 /1/ 6./k S d a r.� J Z/ L 1C.//l fGZ 4 ic//J j_ X.i.6. ku 570 2— /3- G 2-- a (g L(L„,E ALI A M . ).4.4v ./_ --ki_2gt- ._�- 9 // ApyNmia a.J) aye. /v1 Li_ 9 tD,5 . a.- /fe-9oZ 3 C f 11,61_a1-A_ _ ikL -- - - ._ -- -- ‘L N41ve)e 1/4_1/LAt l_gWa . -/ .-g-1 ----.-.- �F��� eY 1 i e W o ad 3 D. � e , 1\ r\ I\ 7 rQ 4Z 1 I 22? 881-- 1IxG AIi& . 8.'g_ - . �ciG.� 0-711 -_ - , - — = .,&. OPINION EXPRESSION LATE HOURS NOISE FOR ECF;R;CU-048-90 To: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton: Regarding the request for an extension of the allowable time for noise in connection with subject proposal, I wish to express my opinion regarding any allowed extension. My own preference for any extension is: Echoice] (1) 7:00 PM (2) 7:30 PM (3) 8:00 PM (4) 8:30 PM (5) 9:00 PM (6) 10:000 PM - (7) 10:30 PM (8) 11:00 PM My home relative to the expansion is: (a) North (b) NW (c) West (d) SW (e) South (f) SE (g) East (h) NE Choice/ location I Printed Name I Signature I Address I ZIP I Date - 6 C'.�z ,066/4-4 so goS/6 2—/6 - 5 go6449 g.Lizm4.,9.45,0,✓ • .f17 �� c 9go - - ` A L gthaidan a33.( J f Z-lie�9 L �- f .vim !�z� � ti v a �ttz.L, 9.5-6z a-w3 c2_`_ - 5'86s6 a -le-9s- • OPINION EXPRESSION LATE HOURS NOISE FOR, ECF;R:CU-048-90 To: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton: Regarding the request for an extension of the allowable time for noise in connection with subject proposal, I wish to express my opinion rewarding any allowed extension. My own preference for any extension is: [choice] (1) 7:00 PM (2) 7:30 PM (3) 8:00 PM (4) 8:30 OM (5) 9:00 PM (6) 10:00 PM (7) 10:30 PM (8) 11:00 PM My home relative to the expansion is: (a) North, (b) NW (c) West (d) SW (e) South (f) SE (a) East (h) NE Choice/ location 1 Printed Name 1 Siunature i ' A dress I ZIP 1 Date a6146 ,1 ; u. )olii ig� o� 7á % 1. /y - � /�' 74./ z9r1e/ - v - 972Z3 gt2 q_ESP 7)/QZ, F-3kr-Zildeg,_ A44- A/F33e2-5: ,5-7 in _I L :al-A L 5°-- _i377 jam ' 1/6- 91e6-5-6 ee•ALD - 4Ze-- . G �a l ('-1��° �i r�i s � 5� .•�yLo t/ /�f` eat r a- l - —r7.9 2- • OPINION EXPRESSION LATE HOURS NOISE FOR ECF:R;CU-048-90 . To: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton: Reoardinq the request for an extension of the allowable time for noise in connection with subject proposal, I wish to express my opinion regarding any allowed extension. My own preference for any extension is: [choice] ` (1) 7:00 PM (2) 7:30 PM (3) 8:00 PM (4) 8:30 PM (5) 9:00 PM (6) 10:00 PM (7) 10:30 PM (8) 11:00 PM My home relative to the expansion is: (a) North (b) NW (c) West (d) SW (e) South (f) SE (g) East (h) NE, Choice/ location . 1 Printed Name 1 Signature 1 Address I ZIP I Date Z_--ci----- _ rcaces Sw-•1.104 1 .. - --- 030 / .E 1ei7/ Y0; 0,5- .2 - /5f-7.2 6i A E.. 5'. Pen wilt[ q,....0 30 3o Are /07" 14i0 1 q en s 6 2-,q-q z Li A Of At. 04 • sNAI(ctk V 619.U.L. V --} Cr•-- -ic3o nl,t. lb - is1 ` %aa(., y-i-1 - 4 jA ).f :C6. /Q cri( __.- •- ---�r - - - o,% �i /Q e / pa 56 n2-- 4- /`- ` 9 1114J _I -- /..i AP.Z(_%kii2 0 ' A ‘7- ii2.5d le_ ,.:/z.17i.50_/ .f.&_sL. ,i-yiz- 0?_- a-4-4_,...4 o� 1,(/r/17 p a a r e S eonviei-S cz?G o 6' g_p//I O.2 7,6S7.- - /,f— r L Vez Bp_l 1_ C411,11L2"i ( r-,-(Ae ,-tZ 30 3b.IE )P 71' d/41- 2- Wa__ 2_212i1:-.2_4- it A_____ Ig\.b.AD ou5_. ' . __ _ 3 ul_o_U_L_\_a`_eti± `LI--- 9g 1.10_ sa.-J 4-- q z , _ Os, .40vJA.9,ii_ apni. c e ' 2-- 5.5 6 60_4(_k_id a e atUP g Ye,54 01--/,5- -V a-, ,E.,c2„__,_,_A . v v fv, , Uk r,v,e,,1-0,7 5D 6 .A6::-. I§ y 7_ Tare 2 ..1-6'\-"I Ik.11 L- lle C>o 1 b -- 'eel& uo �0�..e/b— Gc" 4z)--? fg 4056 OPINION EXPRESSION LATE HOURS NOISE FOR ECF;R:CU-048-90 To: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton: Regarding the request for an extension of the allowable time for noise in connection with subject proposal, I wish to express my opinion rewarding any allowed extension. My own preference for any extension is: [choice] (1) 7:00 PM (2) 7:30 PM (3) 8:00 PM ' (4) 8:30 PM (5) 9:00 PM (6) 10:00 PM (7) 10:30 PM (8) 11:00 PM ' My home relative to the expansion is: (a) North (b) NW (c) West (d) SW (e) South (f) SE (g) East (h) NE Choice/ location I Printed Name j I Signature I Address I ZIP I Date -is art L Aie -- 90? ftity t vt,.u_?orc?e.‘2_iU_E Wo-S-6 ?ii. (0/2'.2- G. Q / go lo//4 di _f se _., _,,,,,/Leo d /v - 57f4' Ia Q/4/2 3 G. 7- Co rr e ---_ _ a _ 9 _ , .aa _G.G : ._.__92.a C._ _ 647 _ - _1A- A_-- Ala - --'' 72F-a)- d-r �C2.2.41,-2-1 ��� roe . e_ra3-6 92-4 0 _ 90 3 c-7-r b--g6 /,/,&---- , -/-14-q871 ' 're__--d-414 g3124, phyla-.7-d_Q:AAL . -Wc?... 7g o SZ yi/6 j7-2 - i 6 12/0 j-Cotr.-:Ck) /P ,-- ‘..ler, z-,I , P Gar.e' ' ', 7JG5 J --/‘_ F2 - 3 G Elyihat-ii - , Za:Ziri- , J71 )g',0,-Z _,z- '-- 2--- 3 C I-'/e.././!t L u ci<e. r..,2- +„„„-.Z_ &-e.,,,.)1 6 . `,re)6 6 .?- /4 --9.2 ---a--- -ram"t-4,- r__tithtk-g.-- - - - -- --- --- -3 Del_A dd 0 0.0°1_,.til4 . _isii6- elc2r6_ __J_L _ 3 C4 . L-i./46,&141 -_kad. ' - e-t_i L/4 Lyy-/1t1 10 n1E gs i0 2-/6,-Lz. • __ --- L-dt -��__d_, tiik A F Ci.V` 7/y Z_vtitwuzi( 11T c fr J7 D---/ -'i 2. G- _NAGuyx.__get3_51Y. c atazi2a..--4,14z,21,2,c gz-3 iNrinyko.4_ t-. P 1 S Z-LL- z 3__C____ 1)E1vA. .5&II:A-AZ__ i L .B•SJ.L)(,nrivIvav d Ay"NA -L. o /.7- q-2., OPINION EXPRESSION LATE HOURS NOISE FOR ECF;R;CU-048-90 To: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton: Regarding the request for an extension of the allowable time for noise in connection with subject proposal, I wish to express my opinion regarding any allowed extension. My own preference for any extension is: [choice] (1) 7:00 PM (2) 7:30 PM (3) 8:00 PM (4) 8:30 PM (5) 9:00 PM (6) 10:00 PM (7) 10:30 PM (8) 11:00 PM My home relative to the expansion is: (a) North (b) NW (c) West (d) SW (e) South (f) SE (a) East (h) NE Choice/ location I Printed Name I Signature I Address I ZIP I Date G Nr\ R2f-sHg-N M coy ,,QAAkt 6 G, -1 or ,osz, 1 EA_Z., 5 6 1/C�r9- l`'l, g�� 40, _ 6e1CL �/JY e . 9gos,Z 11S GZ Z 14' s r � _G le.z K -9 .6vi z1. __ w-6fiv,IL • • • OPINION EXPRESSION LATE HOURS NOISE FOR ECF:R:CU-048-90 To: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton: Regarding the request for an extension of the allowable time for noise in connection with subject proposal, I wish to express my opinion regarding any allowed extension. My own preference for any extension is: Cchoice7 (1) 7:00 PM (2) 7:30 PM- (3)' 8:00 PM (4) 8:30 PM (5) 9:00 PM (6) 10:00 PM (7) 10:30 PM (8) 11:00 PM My home relative to the expansion is: (a) North (b) NW (c) West (d) SW (e) South (f) SE (g) East (h) NE Choice/ . location 1 Printed Name 1 Signature 1 Address 1 ZIP 1 Date 44/_./fix2_,L,E4Ae 0-c-‘ _.4z4d:// "40 j c,Ysc4 Too s c A-7//G/7•L--- J.nwiFpzaN • 477aLinDard.KnEgkaa _ _ 2i. . erg _ ` .4 i k t_kad 4.1.a.A6 06esc 2A0 - :3 Fet-r psi e il Q si e-a20.7 4 . .esa441 cp 7 L 1„_u_D)A '� --- q-z--� '---- -Z-( Le Z DA-ct-e-Ae. /00Aie44-P 1-,11.14 vuo 0-0?;e6v-e-PLD.!7.5: • .ZIMIZZ,, • z^� �~]� �HBITqe- ���J� ��� �\ ��l�� � �l�- RESIDENTS OPINIONS - TRAFFIC CONDITIONS NE10th, SUNDAY AM Sheet/Choice (1) (2) (3) (4) a 11 2 b 5 ' c 13 d 6 1 e 3 f 13 g 7 Totals 58 3 N 0 RBIDNTS OPINIONS - TRAFFIC CONDITIONS NE10th, WEEKDAYS Sheet/Choice (1) (2) (3) (4) a 1 12 b 1 4 c W 13 d 1 5 1 ' e 0 3 f 0 13 g 0 7 Totals 3 37 21 0 CHOICE LEGEND: (1) CONGESTED (2) SOMEWHAT CONGESTED (3) LIKE ANY RESIDENTIAL STREET WOULD BE EXPECTED TO BE (4) CLEAR ^ '. • • TRAFFIC CONDITIONS NE10th STREET BETWEEN KIRKLAND AVE NE & INDEX AVE NE - RE CUP PER ECF;R;CU-048-9@ To: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton: I would like to express my opinion regarding the traffic conditions alono NE1@th between Kirkland and Index Ayes NE. I am familiar with the conditions because of frequent use. I understand that it will be presented at the Public Hearing on subject application by Highlands Community Church. From the choices given, my choice represents the closest fit of a description of traffic conditions along there: Cchoice] (1) Congested (2) Somewhat Congested (3) Like any residential Street would be expected to be. (4) Clear Sun- days I Week AM I Days I Printed Name I__Signature . I Address I ZIP I Date L 2 gice Czo FF- • efeleti-zej ei 161iltoiub 5:9751 3 .1 Do_as_ 8415 /9 k f A.KL eldicL E 1,5 I /11-0 N DOA g kL/A-- OW gy Th5L __ Uoi.#;-.5t. 300T Nr vos-1 / 3-9 -2- / 1 2 G© a,v Z. itie/Lit} /(1 ,���[«� vD ��ti� ��oS� 2 - /3- / I .2o L'/ o 62 6 g. L-, 7g-6,s7o 2- - i3 - 9 ? /--I-2--- --£ILL. A 11 ,. 1-'fjL . - v �J/y 2 y/bsl"Grfa ode, e / cz- J 1 V rv4-414 '.�J .t oDd&e_A.- is a - I -9-V -)2e6") )(iN4)-26 p_P 14s4d.k4r 9 7d - aga"- Fee ire_ff iidY? '_Cry�i_ _ �- vim,r_ , (�%V�- - ---_ _ �i� �''` 'r C-{- N- C . 6 j G L G "" TRAFFIC CONDITIONS NElOth STREET BETWEEN KIRKLAND AVE NE & INDEX AVE NE - RE CUP PER ECF,R;CU-04B-90 To: Hearing Examiner. City of Renton: I would like to express my opinion regarding the traffic conditions along NElOth between Kirkland and Index Aves NE. I am familiar with the conditions because of frequent use. I understand that it will be presented at the Public Hearing on subject application by Highlands Community Church. From the choices given, my choice represents the closest fit of a description of traffic conditions along there: [choice] (1) Congested (2) Somewhat Congested (3) Like any residential Street would be expected to be. (4) Clear Sun- days I Week AM I Days I Printed Name I Sign ture I Address I ZIP I Date / I Z [,2� .NCW1),///ti r 937 2-Alo ( CT ti<< 9,56.1 ‘ z -/6 I I fr t69 ,Q.2/c/F 495,w cb .4 8z 7 JzabIG 4 e 9s70 a-/( -9� I 2 .LiCtety L %G.h Ski 133- 9thiA_C - n E Life_ 2:16-9z / i -. ..3,.„n,avo-ce 78 o. G a- Z 2, .c, � / I J 1.co Q !-©sH il�rr AveLa2.4.4/..ea, 133 e n , � co -/9- • I • TRAFFIC CONDITIONS NE1Oth STREET BETWEEN KIRKLAND AVE NE & INDEX AVE NE - RE CUP PER ECF;R;CU-048-9@ To: Hearing Examiner! City of Renton: I would like to express my opinion regarding the traffic conditions along NE1Oth between Kirkland and Index Aves NE. I am familiar with the conditions because of frequent use. I understand that it will be presented at the Public Hearing on subject application by Highlands Community Church. From the choices given, my choice represents the closest fit of a description of traffic conditions along there: Echoice3 (1) Congested (2) Somewhat Congested (3) Like any residential Street would be expected to be. (4) Clear Sun- days I Week Aid I Days I Printed Name I Signature I Address I ZIP I Date I 1 ca e..s_ 1 n i[s Wit •� lizgzakx., s� �� � 002 g 62‘-05; 02-/y 10 of A L M I✓.�N �c V.. Q tie �s-e--►�-t. � o j�f.IF^ . 1 d Yy = 1 b I Cf%Cc(' y (y - CC-1/ t I 2- £. J Feekralek Sono PE /omi 4160, 48056 , 2.-444P- 1 I . - a IGe. I, 1_ Ad t-bd d4714,30.( floFf _ _ I DojoacS onaber s _ Xis_ • ,=3-0.30 /?/. tO ' ZilLar feoo '. /474- 7 BiLLL_Ccol -3°361 -YE .1°7 4e7_7"_ .21),<-37_ `... Lb `__04 `Co \ 651Q___ 4_14_ _ • -bAA-04, 3 cs 3 CV\i "" 1444,a/a,b6 _a_d_5_:_-!2- / I y .Al'�11'y Z/ odL= --_ gip, L!1 -erff "t /JJ I I V%,114,0. }, (n . 5/6?-A° //0,-,J g z, -A4a z fz-ei ,f„r g'a /1 -:t://5* r • TRAFFIC CONDITIONS NEloth STREET BETWEEN KIRKLAND AVE NE & INDEX AVE NE - RE CUP PER ECF;R:CU-@48-9@ To: Hearing Examiner. City of Renton: I would like to express my opinion regarding the traffic conditions along NElOth between Kirkland and Index Aves NE. I am familiar with the conditions because of frequent use. I understand that it will be presented at the Public Hearing on sub.iect application by Hibhlands Community Church. From the choices given, my choice represents the closest fit of a description of traffic conditions along there: • [choice] (1) Congested (2) Somewhat Congested (3) Like any residential Street would be expected to be. (4) Clear Sun • - days I Week AM I Days I Printed Name • atu e I Address I ZIP. I Date _ r / I �� a2e/i �r�say, --- -, /-Z %� 9fS � ai 7 22, gO4A-1 90g ie//ek4i/ot. A)Z- . -/ 7 - -- I z-5/9.-f/4"1" . --- b_Vi v i d , f O3 l I N1 e L #4-1 F Lio .2 Y` ei _- 8 37 //'f L 1 i/L Aipc e/t 76'OS‘ 2 -/ 7-- Lcy Q . , .er// Q a-/7- 9'2 ALS 4LL L9a -- 'r. A-,c /D 4�- - _�_• I Ct i - • TRAFFIC CONDITIONS NEiOth STREET BETWEEN KIRKLAND AVE NE & INDEX AVE NE - RE CUP PER ECF;R;CU-@48-90 To: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton: I would like to express my opinion regarding the traffic conditions along NE1@th between Kirkland and Index Aves NE. • I am familiar with the conditions because of frequent use. I understand. that it will be presented at the Public Hearin° an subject application by Highlands Community Church. From the choices given, my choice represents the closest fit of a ' description of traffic conditions along there: [choice] (1) Congested (2) Somewhat Congested (3) Like any residential Street would be expected to be. (4) Clear Sun- days• 1 Week AM I Days I Printed Name I Signature I Address , I ZIP I Date f I f\N Erz-140614EEw TUVig rn , (4 oLLV v au :E 9W 57 si. VM44i- goi2 _k/RIrgzmvp /911.A1,6. 2ros--6 .t//8/0,2_, 1 i k C072ije-, s / G !/ 2 s . 1 /Gi1-tu 4) 9 $1-- -- LL 9z • 1 TRAFFIC CONDITIONS NE10th STREET BETWEEN KIRKLAND AVE NE & INDEX AVE NE - RE CUP PER ECF;R;CU-048-90 To: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton: I would like to express my opinion regarding the traffic conditions along NElOth between Kirkland and Index Ayes NE. I am familiar with the conditions because of frequent use. I understand that it will be presented at the Public Hearing on subject application by Highlands Community Church. From the choices given, my choice represents the closest fit of a description of traffic conditions along there: [choice] (1) Congested (2) Somewhat Congested (3) Like any residential Street would be expected to be. (4) Clear Sun- . days I Week AM I Days I Printed Name 1 Signature _ I Address I ZIP I Date _1_1_2_ 4.v.2/4_EzeTzu...ax___ _.,02/7..e- 1-/A_4_ 4_ 2 V-2.4e ,p_tegr.z. :2421-2-A2f- f..MiZ 5 A 2_ 44 13 aY ar49w, Ai44ad gam' �io ,�.r�/�c/© fiye-�Me-17056 g-/�-9A�-. .1. I 3 LI.O ),gs Jfifi 11 . fr., !/Lz7o ,'crl -7-1 q., 9 ta, (o d2-I .5-- 2 .2_ • / I a DILI sR tzi lif • g6 Y'd -- ---- i/-5 9'es,6 &- /4 ' — 1- I 3 Ect�,&.(4,r 8 f7A-4it3 ��.. ii. 0 7 _g '--- mi-v-rd__ r x . rid SZ /C .Y r --J_-'-��---- zep.t_-_;_9_ -- cA-",. .4/. --- '�- ' c'12c0 or-� n/il ,)2I'A�C _/c_ f' �- ___/-7_1____ __ 0.,:t rkbiaini .... , _iti7)y ha orrigato-471 L rS-10-!-- a -1‘--?2-- Xe4„, --_L--1-- -- . .z. yr__�' _- - 4._ ---- 962 ,s` 10,07,0 a06_ ►% fa - -9..5_x'&- . j C.,`,)- 1 I 3 ii-0/ e e- -X.2 Z r -- -iL4��' . it 7 giiG Ili g 51(0-_ 2-/o--Y2 __L_1_3___ _11/WIL.L.t1 ---C. LA-14-42._ IlL . ..,.... '1 trit L(±AiNG,A4,,cli .4-crz fiE: %-brt .D,-&-f,D._ --i--1_s___ _Koktmvk Yix51.:11e( 60/6wal.fxbaikzir C42.3 i..►a 0-wii dive • cfve 1.. )a_ L -16.:=`i. , • • TRAFFIC CONDITIONS NElOth STREET BETWEEN KIRKLAND AVE NE & INDEX AVE NE - RE CUP PER ECF;R;CU-048-90 To: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton: I would like to express my opinion regarding the traffic conditions along NE1Oth between Kirkland and Index Ayes NE. I am familiar with the conditions because of frequent use. I understand that it will be presented at the Public Hearing on subject application by Highlands Community Church. From the choices given, my choice represents the closest fit of a description of traffic conditions along there: Echoice) (1) Congested (2) Somewhat Congested (3) Like any residential Street would be expected to be. (4) Clear Sun- days 1 Week AM i Days I Printedrr Name ' I Signature 1 Address 1 ZIP 1 Date 1 .3 tLe-3.¢2 1=t?G-1=-2Jat.-- - a TaZ-O ��aa 5 Li L GiLe P --- - - _ .GZ��o2>1 wP� L�r; _t[ f L�Sit l[L,L2 - I 13 ALL 6.43, . .0..ciscA ///' r • -..40-402,e,, 7go c-6 .sv//6/./z-- J1,011MCIfE9sol Lgonw t 9S-ofea i 1 ran i e c}t.lb2.rGt 2/ 4 ea -- :2Lj k at/r ci ,tie 9d-t9 4,i/,c'- -- --'_---- -� c.rt- .--=.-�- _ _ [ •� we o d Aft 2 ,-& r_� i• 1 . a R I_ s U) UE Ell JE !A Eh a U Ul ul lU Ul N Ul U> N In Lit U: LEI UI IS} Ul LR VI UI III Ill a Ui a N La Ul a VI La ul IA Lei Ul ill LA a a Ui Ul Ul Ul UI i'+1 1-.1 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a at at a a a a a a a a at a Cu a a at al a a a a a a a a a ai a s �'a '4 _I >1 >, A >1 A A >, >1 A >1 >1 >5 >i >, >, >1 >7 >1 >, >, >T >, >1 X >1 X >, >1 11 >1 >1 >1 >1 A >! >1 >, >s >, A >, >: >, >1 >, >1 A >, >, 0 tJ • CIi .;a: r r i _�,.i;"' in ii itl dP CD ii1 CD 41 U7 EP CP tt1 CP tt1 +S U1 CD CP ul CP 41 CP U1 CD tt1 41 Ill CP H7 CP 41 CP 41 41 C 41 -•+ Is- u1 CP Ul ii7 Ill CP Ill tt1 Ill 41 ['1 Ei1 CD -s 0 -4isOjisCifU1CnU1EDC1 .-1 -+ cu UO3 �1 01PI0.101 '4 e01 �i' i� tUt/ �` '4 4In4 CPCnEnINl0tUInUiU414' CP -t Cn U7 rts . .J Z CU -tCU -I0 -4S -i -I -t -1 -4 -t ,ice r4GT iSi SGIS & CU CU • SIDIDS '^ -1 ssie -,'• -+ is. ecr. s Geis -. si stsis, ial''' ilt-f E_3 GISISt & 5ta5tStt5sis61StiSttstmt6t511S15tSiSfi +S1St51Ss1ai51i .teiSrStv15+ �t9 +51 �tC ses ea51 W ¢ .3 CU 4- OJ 3 444 .i' •i 44 .tS4. .t •v 4dV 4- al4 .4- CUiLI0,1OJOJ !U ' 4 3EnCUiUiiJi0001sUCUt'UC4 .# t 1i! iU .(' to 4- I` Q is. i 44 4 4- 4- 4- 4 4- 4 4- 4 4 - 4 4 4- 4 .P 4P- I` t- Is- P- 4 4 4is- t- Is- Is- I` 1` Is- E f- Is- Is 3' i` Is r- V x P- U7 is- 41 Is- is- Is- Is- Is- is- 0- P- Is- is- r- Is- is- I` h I` P- Is- U1 is- Is- 41 hi U7 ul U1 'i1 1` is- P- CU tit U1 Ill Cu OJ IDU7 U7 41 ul is- cu U7 L1 CO ¢ e ..t. is. 4 is. is, is. G. is, G. is. i5+ is, G. e e ID 5 St � IS St 4 t 3 t -I* S & III d 4- 0.1 0.1 4 44 v ID CU 4 I- U) CdU) CdC40303W 01 U) 03COU) COc003CO0303003c0CU0a5 !U CU CU =JCUCU03COU) is- CUCU11lis- NCU !.1CUCUCUCOIs- CUFiJ I r J1 ti IA 0¢ Ui WWWW WW ZZ O 1 Z Z Z Z W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W Z Z W W W W ti ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ W W W W ZZZ E3 a 0! W i7 W W W W W Z WW ' Z al ZZZZau > > > Z > ZZZZZ ZZ � > > > > Ilia EL'• a a a a a a a �3 a a a a a W a > > a a a .-t ¢ a —1 a ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > .i a -P ¢. ¢ > > > Era a, as .tS -f� +• .N . > .i.) . U ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ a ¢ a ¢ ¢ ¢ s_ L- L. ¢ Q ¢ - s- •L- s_ L- s_ ¢ L- s_ J 0 0 0 0 10 D -Q t7 •D 0 13 "i1 13 -013 13 'II t� ti "D ti 0 (J) 4-) 4.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 t i ti 10 ID -P +> 0 al 01 0 C' 0 0 0 13 in 0 0 ' �, E € UE I is9 In 5- s. 5 k s. 5_ s- 5. s- u u u tiu ij 0 co in U U C? UVI Ul s= O 0 ul m DE U ut 0 C..) U G 0 0 El 0E-4 n U! s- i. S. L. ru la ro al 4i 0,.; ra =G Ri fa it `G 0 i 1 0 i 1 U tit S. S. i0 u 0 S: C 77 :I: -C 0 .CE i 01 wl a s at ,-t 1-1 rt .-1 r-t +-t .-4 ,-t +-1 tt 3 3 3 3 3 3 .E3 .-E t X X X X a UI -4 3 3 ; -t "4 X d3 X X X X X 3 .i:. X X ' ' W 4- 4- 4- 4- v ~' .x Y' s .X Y .s - £ 5= 57.: 5= : ES -P -p a a a a 4- 4- Y C 5= CO L- C. a Le 0 a a a a at S: ED a a i.;: t.+- 4- 4•- 5.. S. S_ S. S. S. S- S. S- S. S: 5- t s. ..1 Cn Cn -0 'u 1 u 4- 4- L_ 5.7 SD S.. f- D --1 13 -J U D 'u s= -t ti -mot A >+ X > >, >1 I1i W C S: 5= C al a •� >e >i W r r s= W W S- - s. s- 5- >i W s. C.' � .� Cn A a zIt a Qi •.-+ •rt .rt •tt .� •rt .,.� •rt .N •-e .,rt •a W `+` i3Jto 'i 1-1 t'7 I", XY Y SC X. XY Y :L Y X 1' t _i U J . J Z Z Z t--t t-t t--t t•-t t-i Y _i _I Z T z t-t Z Z 1-, s-t -; "4 1-4 .-P Z "4 t_ ¢ a. : 01 u1 Cn CU U7 to 0, 4J Cn 4- c+ 0 a' 4. 0 !iJ ti] -t in E�• 00 Cn CU Cn -4s E'9 Ps- hi -4 P- i5 hi -4 Cn CP u) CC' 41 _ 4 Cn CU a -t T 4 1E1 t o -' a 03K1 Y d•1Inh1In ..tInU700IS '40.1U1 {r -t -1CU01 -tCD -4 CUf101441U10.14lt1EDL1In ?.ICP011:Ui1t14 .- PI G+ OJt1 t I-- a3 CO COCEO c0 a3 EU CE3 U) co ar a) C' On 0n Cn CI' CO [i Cn Cn Cn CP 4.1 ' CD CO 00 03 c0 a3 a) 0) a3 Cn CO c0 © CO Is- is a1 U) 00 03 U) CD CU CO C3 in 0) PI 03 Cu Cu PI Cu 1O )' A , �r 0 li; lr �.-1 U Z L] -1 cu .-e Cu 4.4 -t "4 -t -r ..-1 _, "4 ,-i "4 "4 -, "4 "4 -a "4 "4 -i "4 "4 !�J iU cu Ci i CU cu -' -4 _ -t 'Al 4J 'Al ,-4 --1 CU al Cii Cu CU -4 -+ CU CU i ED P.E CC CcOCCcCCccCCCCCCCcCCCCCCCCCCCCCCOCCCCCCCCCCCCC E3_ EYEtCCCtCC CC CC CCACCCCCCalEYC cc I LL' Cc COOC C Z. 11-4 Er co 03 co U) U) U) U) U) U) 0Dat103c0C000 03C U) (000Ua) cD0300EnnCn0/ Cn EnCnCnCnCnCPCPCPfiii .-1 -i -4 -= -4 -i 'Xi02 • 1' ¢ U1 41 U7 41 U7 41 U1 41 U1 L1 U1 41 U1 In U1 41 Ell hi U 1 41 U1 Ill U7 41 U1 41 U1 41 U7 Ul 111 41 111 '•_t1 U7 u3 u1 u1 0 1.0 0 u) 0 u1 0 0 u1 L u1 u W . CnCnCnCnLnCnEn On OrtnLnCnLetL' LetCnCnCnC' CnLnCnEnCnLe CnCnCnCnCnCnciLn anLnCnOnCnCnitCnalE_nCnLlGin CnCnCn } I -t --t -t 4.-1 -.t ,a -t ' "1 ,-t -1 -t .-t -t -t -t -t -1 -t -t -; -t ,-, -t '4 ,-1 --t -t -t ,-t ,-t -t '4 -t '4 ,a -i -t -t ,-s -•t '4 ,-t -t ,-; -; '4 '4 h CU 1-a En I Cc CU ¢ s W I >• CU CD YEAR BUILT [KING COUN ASSESS PUBLIC INFO SYS VS CERT LIST OF 300 02-02-1992 Page 2 YEAR ZONE ST. ADDRESS TAX ACC NO LIS 1964 B1 2725 NE Sunset Blvd 722780-1026 yes 1964 R1 3104 NE10th St 285480-0200 yes 1965 B1 925 Harrington Ave NE 722750-0620 yes 1967 R3 3030 NE10th St 008900-0090 yes 1971 B1 2801 NE Sunset Blvd 722790-06990 yes 1973 B1 900 Harrington Ave NE 722780-1028 yes 1976 B1 2901 NE10th St 722780-1027 yes 1977 R3 1013 Kirkland Ave NE 008900-0140 yes 1980 B1 9__ Harrington Ave NE 722750-0635 yes 1982 B1 10069 Index Ave NE 722790-0075 yes 1984 B1 935 Harrington Ave NE 722750-0625 yes LAND B1 Behind Taco Belle 722750-0630 yes LAND B1 Adjacent Employment Sec. 008900-0050 yes LAND B1 Church B-1 lot 722780-0040 yes LAND B1 Next to boat works 722780-1024 yes TOTAL Printed 64 of the 135 records. � / . . � • P ' ' 1 1 I . `� ' t 1 t• ' R r 'r ;— ----. 1 =. . . ) 1 ro I2 1 ruk...i.itc. ` Jt • tI C a� i, s • ----- 24 1 • I its • r /[1t3 /: ill. 1 Z. 1 , R lid=3 R-3 tVa.. 1 • , , I arf ‘ , lr W' 7I ./.._, • 4 1 4 I I I I TI t ` r � 4) _ to II I[ .• .s R-3 / , tlii. I I N E . I I 1!1 I 1:1 S , rit4 1 o 0 lisy; /, j8 / , , ,.. to i nil 4'J / 3 .18 ,t 1 N E o.. e • T— f 1 rN,k...... 4 / „i4 \ .i; t— ..._, ,- , • �/ ,$ ° t. , 113 '.. .., G— 1 \ sR 4 ,4j/ I ,IQ 1 ro _ r'. 37 •i— �� IS I G ti = 19 . 7 \ l',-) %'--.-. ' I /0 74„,, 9 I 2.4 1 ' .41 r [ / _1 \ • + , ,+ t -3 Nor..►. _ 1 ,,..�-, _.l,,u••� d -,z -:- ' /._.1 „ • T ,_......---: s\t. \2 i _ • • 11b54 •�� atc Hi,.•1:.__� '�• : .• • ,, \ >Qtl ' ' , _ � l � 1. l �l �• is ,� ,I 1 • A•r 7 , ,....._ 22 ; 7 , A - — j � I R_2 • 1. • , 1 0 1,• , .• L° °5 ) �� ' • ' - s . .j ) S' i1r,i-4 L ANDS l 1\ 1_ . L:7 ,T: ,� s'j.- i CLEW. NTARY —'' E •if � 1 I 3C41(`L)l —1 , [ I I 4 R I' p- 1 • n" - TOT �f "��' + N E/"%G, e4 . -. . [ 7..9., la....- 1714.x ,,, 0,0,, a r //teZa ::34.'2+ I 2• 1y ---- O •' ..] I _ 1'� - ,. • , . �. -i. I I n I I • I i I . l ' /4, ..• .`... 0 ---1"I,e's'. , -- •---• r— 1' .---• ' :\ CS \:&24 4.e.hc.44..,:x-, 1-d.-a-g-i -1-4-al'i . 0' s -- + • 1 �.eTF�p Zi5i o� A..0,6'"ZT`1 D�eJ� S rrl EI t. [ 1 `) rt C r \,,f' i ) t, C• 111 -• - t 1 tl r r .r . ``Q+����`,•/, , '° 14\{µ` i• ,•. [ '�[I ,. ...q I -\ , 1• ) '. I-..-. fA I II I I I1 t, L ~ EXHIBY�� � h ^ ��_ ��� � - �~ �� � �� �'~� YEAR BUILT [KING COUN ASSESS PUBLIC INFO SYS] VS R1, R2, & R3 ZONES 02-02-1992 Page 1 YEAR ZONE 8T. ADDRESS TAX ACC NO � 1957 R1 778 Lynnwood Ave NE 780900-0080 1957 R1 852 Lynnwood Ave NE 780900-0030 1958 R1 806 Jefferson Ave NE 807440-0190 1958 R1 812 Jefferson Ave NE 807440-0195 1958 R1 818 Jefferson Ave NE 807440-0200 1958 R2 819 Jefferson Ave NE 245720-0165 1958 R1 824 Jefferson Ave NE 807440-0205 1958 R1 830 Jefferson Ave NE 807440-0210 1958 R1 836 Jefferson Ave NE 807440-0215 1958 R2 839 Jefferson Av&^NE 245720-0100 1958 R1 842 Jefferson Ave NE 807440-0220 1958 R2 845 Jefferson Ave NE 245720-0105 , 1958 R1 755 Kirkland Ave NE 894850-0030 1958 R1 756 Kirkland Ave NE 780900-00969 1958 R1 801 Kirkland Ave NE 807440-0180 1958 R1 804 Kirkland Ave NE 807440-00769 M58 R1 805 Kirkland Ave NE 807440-0175 1958 R1 812 Kirkland Ave NE 8697440-0075 1958 R1 813 Kirkland Ave NE 807440-0170 1958 R1 818 Kirkland Ave NE 807440-0080 1958 R1' 819 Kirkland Ave NE 807440-0165 1958 R1 824 Kirkland Ave NE 807440-0085 1958 R1 825 Kirkland Ave NE 807440-0160 ' 1958 R1 830 Kirkland Ave NE 807440-0090 1958 R1 833 Kirkland Ave NE 8697440-0155 1958 R1 836 Kirkland Ave NE 807440-0095 1958 R1 839 Kirkland Ave NE 807440-0150 1958 R1 844 Kirkland Ave NE 807440-0100 1958 R1 850 Kirkland Ave NE 807440-0105 1958 R1 856 Kirkland Ave NE 807440-0110 1958 R1 900 Kirkland Ave NE 807440-0115 1958 R1 904 Kirkland Ave NE 807440-0120 1958 R1 908 Kirkland Ave NE 807440-0125 1958 R1 912 Kirkland Ave NE 807440-0130 1958 R1 926 Kirkland Ave NE 807440-0140 1958 R1 16922 Kirkland Ave ' E 285480-0185 1958 R1 1028 Kirkland Ave NE 285480-0180 1958 R1 1034 Kirkland Ave NE 285480-0175 1958 R1 782 Lynnwood Ave NE 780900-0075 1958 R1 815 Lynnwood Ave NE 807440-0065 1958 R1 821 Lynnwood Ave NE 807440-0060 1958 R1 824 Lynnwood Ave NE 780900-0050 1958 R1 827 Lynnwood Ave NE 807440-0055 1958 R1 833 Lynnwood Ave NE 807440-0050 1958 R1 834 Lynnwood Ave NE 780900-0050 1958 R1 838 Lynnwood Ave NE 780900-0045 1958 R1 842 Lynnwood Ave NE 780900-0040 1958 R1 848 Lynnwood Ave NE 780900-0035 1958 R1 851 Lynnwood Ave NE 807440-0035 ' 0 I PI _ ro DO 1 µ 50 C ro r —I ..a F-- F-+ P. t_. F. ,-. P. F-+ P. P. i- Is F. Fa Fs ,-+ F. F. Fs P. i.,. F. F-'. P. F. F. F. r F. F. F. F. Fa F- .- P. ps P. p., I-` F•a I.... ps " is Is t-+ 1 -< LO u3 lia u3 u7 ti7 u3 1.3 ur u3 u3 v u3 u3 v7 1.13 u0 ci; u0 u3 u3 143 ti3 u3 u3 u3 u7 u3 ttl u3 t0 u3 u3 u3 u3 u3 iu' u3 u0 u3 J u3 tJ u3 uD u3 u0 u3 u) I in i-, 01 01 01i Cn 01 01 01 CA Ln Cn Ln Ln Ln CA Ln LA Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Lit Ln En Ln Ln CA En CA En Ln Ln En ER Cn Ln Ln En CA cm CA En Ln cm cn ER CA EA I D X +gCDCPED CDEDE u3u0u3u0u3uau3uiu3u30opu3 LID u3ulu3 'Xi to ,0wu., 143LOu3u3u3uDupmCo [oiDmComCoOoCoCoCDCD i ;3 f-I 77 Xi .'7c m .M ;itMM :13x3x, XX AX X MM X XM ."' MDODOZiM m ;D ;0 aJmMm .70MnJMxiMmMim M Mm a .7+ i N CI Is Fa. t-. F. ro ro ro is F.a F+ F- ps ,s '-. ,-. ,s t. F. F- ,s Fa P. Fs F. Fs P' r,o ro r) ro ro rc' no ro ro ro F. F. F. " P. '— .s Fs P. P. Fs Fs P. I CD i z C") urn C7 C co F+ F- F+ F-- F+ ss Fa F+ Fa Fa Fa F+ Fa I-• 14 [J (. i— F-• F+ ,-. t— I I Z CDCDCDCDCDCD0] CDCDCDiDi5CDCDiD5iCD 0CoODCDCniD1ZJJCDLCD CDiDCDCDuDODOD ISI CD IsCD ,<, 5+ i) CDCau3u3u3Cl i -1 Co -.4 Co CA CO Lq CA CD ON CA 4' 4' 4' ro .- P' ED En . r? EDCDcnroclEnEnEnco F. 0 CD .P. CO corl1i.-- SiF-. C4roro1- 1-- D3r4F- i-- ED I ° 3) ,-. C' uicO Co01EDr? il .t- coro — n)COroOl :sL -r- -r- CD 4:- CDCD43J - C1 GjJI-- CMN4 C•J91-- u3r UIU) CJJKu3COJ ''' L1 D (II zrrzi" 3Irrrrrrrrrrr- rrrrXXXXLIt.IL, C-1 to, G psi 1 ,-, I-izzzrrrrrrrrrr i d m j i''< '.< Y• :4 W 0.7 `( k< k< '.< ''C << ‘< k< .< << << ;< '.< .!. P. P. P. P. M m M m ID m :5 :5 :5 :5 m m ri}‘‹ k< `< 1< '< '< "< "( `( i cam. Er) 1-,- CS -5 ; a i 1 -5 -5 -5 -5 -c -5 l -5 -5 -5 .1 -5 -5 -5 -5 I I II -h -h -h -. -h -h a a a a u3 u3 -- -5 -5 -5 -5 -5 -5 1 -5 -c -5 I DOCOID 3 _5 x' m ; -5 C5 " -s -5 = C5 C5 C5 -4 x- x' x' x- -II -n -it -d -h 1 m m m m ct ci• ,D Cs -1 5 ; CS C5 5 _ I m ci- E E Fax :,.. F.. E E S E E E E E E E cc E E E 2 I- `-' - - ro 1D m 1D m tD x x x x S T cr 5 E S E E E S E S E i 0) Ti 7 n =, N 7.5 _i i s ci _, o , o i, o n n i c n ft Q =y y Dl 9f i ; i 1 ; 7 0 ;'I . i, CI 0 0 11 0 ,S I to C 0 0 n tEI to n n n n 0 0 ,; 0 i I o, ., in OI 0 OI -5 -5 -5 -1 iii 81 in tri in in Cl o n C) Cr) 0) i 15 O 0 i I n 0 0, ;_I n to 0aaao .F' craaaaaaaaaa as aaaaaaan n n 0 n 0 n n n n crctLoaaaan. aaaaa r c r n n 'S I -5 -5 -5 -5 r- r- .-D 1 1 ; 1 DDDDDDDDDD C) < < < ci` < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < D D D D D D ci- & cF ct < < < < < < < < < < m m ill D D ID m ID m RI m 1D m III m 1D m re m ID m ID m 1D < < < < < < m m 1D m m m 10 m 1D m z < < III IQmIDIDIDZZZZ Z ZZzrID III zzzz GZZZZZZZZZzzzzz mmmm zzzzzzzzzz +1 mmm mmmrnrnrr► mmr rn mmmmmmmmmzzz zzz mmrrlmmmmmmrn o zz mmm mrirym M m CO CO u J NI ro ro ro ro ro ro ro ro ro ro ro ro ro ro ro CD CO •i J J ro Co J COro ro ri:i ro ro r0 re ru rtti rc' co ID ro ro ro r3 ru ro ix' co co co CD —i 11303 Dm .:- .i` -I` CD ® CDmmi) COmamCDGImCDmmCDlOu3T .i` . Ntom -i• T 4.. 4:. isi CDmCDmoo0mEDED +DCDCD D < ro CA Ln CA Ln Cn CA CA Cn Ln cm CA Ln En Ln En Ln J J 5i 5i 5i Ln J 5i -P Ln Ln En CA Cn CA En Cn Ln Ln J J cm Cn LA Ln En CA J J J J J X 0) J -P -P 1` J J J .P .P .P 4` 4- .P 4` -P 4N : -P .P 143 u3 u3 .P -P u3 CD J J J J J J J J J J .P -P .P .P .P -P r .P -P -P -P .. -P Co Co CD Co ro ro CO CD CO to Co CD CD CD CD CD CO .P .P 5i i5, CD OD .P GI Ln ro re rCi 1.0 ro ro no rc PO ro .I` -P co to Co Co co co ..L, �- .P -t .P D iSi seediessSisSiisi5iSies5i essisi 5iSiSi5iSi5i5i eSie6 +5a5i9hs55iSierses +5iGee9 C) ,-, I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I C) -o- ID 51 0 5i 0 d5i a 5i is @ 51 IS iSi +51 GI 0 iSi ID ID IS Si GI GI +5i Si +5i iSi Gs iSi +5i 151 +5i 5I S +5i 151 ,5i Cs-I iSi ID GI Si ID 5+ 0 @ ID ISI iSi 9J xi 1.3CDrttIsCDIsF+ CD10CDEDCDTOCDIt, CD I-- SISICDEDSrF= i= i5ziDisIss F= F- FsIDSI ssF= Ptt1-0n) roPitn) Pit 0EDS` 5FSi z tII r" ti] CJCnCnCFzu30CJ010101J4JCDu7ulCD CD LnCriJJCOCDro ,sF- ul JJ0 -I` CJ riiJ -F` El) 5iGJr4Pitt ,si-' ,s ,srttnoCJ 0 m Ln In Ln Ln CD Ch J CD pI CD Ln 6i cm Ln CD Ln Si Ln CD Ln Ln 5i 5i Ln CA CA Ln 5i Ln 5i En CD Ln CD Cn is En CA CA CD En CD EA CD CD Ln CD Ln o P ro xi CJ IN/ 0 . z m Cr) ` . . . YEAR BUILT [KING COUN ASSESS PUBLIC INFO SYS] VS R1, R2, & R3 ZONES ' 02-02-1992 Page 3 YEAR ZONE ST. ADDRESS TAX ACC NO 1961 R2 824 Index Court NE 245720-0065 1961 R2 829 Index Court NE 245720-0020 1961 R2 832 Index Court NE 245720-0055 1961 R2 840 Index Court NE 245720-0045 1961 R2 841 Index Court NE 245720-0105 1961 R1 1016 Kirkland Ave NE 285480-0190 1961 R1 839 Lynnwood Ave NE 807440-0045 1961 R1 1053 Lynnwood Ave NE 285480-0245 1961 R1 1060 Lynnwood Ave NE 285480-0055 1961 R1 1061 Lynnwood Ave NE 285480-0250 1961 R1 1066 Lynnwood Ave NE 285480-0050 ' 1961 R1 1074 Lynnwood Ave NE 285480-0040 1961 R1 1075 Lynnwood Ave NE 285480-0265 1961 R1 1081 Lynnwood Ave NE 285480-0270 1962 R2 825 Index Court NE 245720-0015 1962 R2 836 Index Court NE 245720-0050 1963 R1 1010 Kirkland Ave NE 285480-0195 1964 R1 3104 NE10th St 285480-0200 1967 R1 808 Lynnwood Ave NE 780900-0060 1967 R3 3030 NE10th St 008900-0090 1977 R3 1013 Kirkland Ave NE 008900-0140 TOTAL - ' - ` Printed 119 of the 135 records. ' ' ' w I ..... .0 1,- t. 1 1 � ►7 ri I a ,. mI \ E____ . ___‘;---______\\_11 I {1I �. c3\ :Ve- ✓' ---- - • °' •I , / G .' "1' : a D■ •• 1 111/11 Il•Il•/ 1 ` --J .—. _ •,(►,.t� - T PY1i1II l �I, y ,, ` . of ii 1 cvti .___A311. ‘6'..; i ., __ .. 4 ___ 3 N I \ 1�10 (.. . , _ . . , . ....d , . ,. . , . ,_ ..• • , . ... ,, 17 ., s I > IC I '�1 G ' �-- ti lll,)li ,,.., _ " i 1.2iyLN :V131 B ,15 1' I:13 i —7 l _ , 1 SON d 1H`�Iti -• i ` - . L r --L. i 0,177 ... 1", 17.." .— . : ---i. ..- c _ - ' t . .. . ' 1 —El t e --.-7 °1 v• N t C t .', of -� { ► 1 z 01.1411kling01 T B�e 1 1 , •� ail. *1 fZ 1 �� "( C ! t' • D r. •• i • rn \ 1i L 3 ti f r - r ,,, \ \ 4 t-i-r- �"' +.: i t r _lir , . . 11 L . e, z 1.., 1 c ;; if .4:1 j cLl • �_ \ � I 1 I /L__ . p ` s 7 N ,° I 1 l ►_ c. _ �- , HT_ ,6 il '' :x,'i i 1._. , //, / ,..4\---\____ .. ,., ,.\ , co _ ,....,.foli Le ,,-; - , oi N 13,_ ik „HILT :, • Pi1 r �i, ,,y, / iiii- \y. .\ ,-. „ J "ira.. I `, / , qu I 9C/ "do4 X/c„ '. 1 /111. Oti I Si r111 ' 1 3 N T 41I Z//� U � / s?(ypz4 JI, / /' - , . � :, i �' COY 4c' /y .-A _rVO r9( .pi y'�yy �/ �/ / yy /, /�7 It E. I. ` S. e 1 (.��' I , ,A 7 f i * vsve, ,e, ci,2/` /'W) —IOW -106; „-d .{ 1 -2, , e IIIIPINNII 8 , 1 0,r 1... L/ �_� . ..) . 1 —8 ,. 1 , E-� i71.. r. 1(2L3 ,t, ...:,../ , „ „ J . , , , I . .• , • 4, },. ('',... 4 7 , 1 1, 1 , , . .„:4:^yetiork,4 I.z ....... L. ....d , . „ -...,___TI 1 '� , t.-a 1 ,• A2 Z VIM • I 7 9 y 1 S . E j .. J� c, a • ` ---------- - - ' - ' '------- ----�-� - ' /~ .7 ��� /�� � \ � '~- � ITEMl� �-� ?k� �J�/�� STATEMENT BY AGGRIEVED NEIGHBOR To: The City of Renton. This statement is made of my own free will . It is my true testimony of experience with having my home in the vicinity of the Bigblaod' s Community Church . I understand that it is to be presented to support a neighbor's opposing position at the Public Hearing held on the application for a conditional use permit/rezone to expand the 8igblood^s Community Church. The fc,llowio9 Church uttribute(o)' have adverse effects upon the enjoyment, comfort and convenience of my property : � . ' . lot -------------��r-------------'-----3�-'-------. ----------------- ---------- \y �` -------- ----- --------------------------------------------------- ............- � ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ^ _------_ --------------------- --------------------------------------------------------- Si t gna ure ' Address Printed Name L/J���^��� 11. T- Re non,, WA' _ ��e���___Date_ ��'����,___ Collected by: Willliarji J. /> Renton, WA; 98056 P STATEMENT BY AGGRIEVED NEIGHBOR To: The City of Renton: This statement is made of my own free will . It is my true testimony of experience with having my home in the vicinity of the Highland' s Community Church . I understand that it is to be presented to support a .neighbor's opposing position at the Public Hearing held on the application for a conditional use permit/rezone to expand the Highland' s Community Church . The following Church attribute(s) have adverse effects upon the enjoyment, comfort and convenience of my property : _.._,:_ed ., 0- ,i--eig--&()_.9. ..z-Q, 2//a-al- ,_., ���'"may" ��,��1'=J`--!.-- - ••-• -•-- - ----.__.__•_� ---••--- ��__ __.__. _._ & LL ZJ .._.) (2) — L-zLe21-- ) ,a—e .) .;/ ;47,,,,, ,,/,, t,„An: . V)-0--,.}.„.-r-L .„ -›, L.%,,,zzi 10.,,L__„_e_z,_, .. ,„zz_/6_.„.25 ,,, ./E2) ,. .."___..,,,z „wif2..) ,,,i , f j4_41) ,,,z,___Le:ei _ c ..._____ . 7 ___„evl'ilV 2 e r a,, °4(-0L--7- _a_d_..."5 _,,,.n. ,,,,riLL.) e... „...4 4i,4_1jj ai __Zis_rz..4 ": --L,6 , De . , Signature _ _ -_-• - --`-_.._.�.'_,._, ✓ Ar3dress l �f �� •/V Printed Name :R (N 42 Rertcnq WA92O5- __.02.,.._.6 C `2 /l/, ' _. _-- s`6i�i/ (_b_° eidollected by: Willlam J. Flynn 911 Lynnwood Ave N. E. ; Renton, WA 9.8056 f c�2 2 1. r r— 1 ' I ' I I . I sr 0 kli r 1b s0 i HC1- 1yC1 N L.- c, aA . d i a to U I-4 CI0 23 iL t i COOj t En i SLizSit7SSPl17SL7SIL7i17L7SLiz CP 0SL7S 0S0i17 0V7SSL7 0SL7S117SL1717S0SSr I : & ir7 °4117ill l U i W C) 1 0) Cu 0J +-i ri ri ri cu Cu i+) Si Cu i (` 01 10 ,-f C4 N f- cn I '-i of a) PO i- N up i) i- EI Si Cn l"h 00 it is- u] u) ul 111 Lh in u) 0 in c Cn CO cI Z 1 SSSSSoJ1;1 'UO1 'IJCIJIl1riSSrSS -I +--I S -iriSS .-i -ISISSS ,SriSt_viscuSSS '•'IJSsi .-ISI � (+J 51 ��'• al IG 1 SSSSSS IDISSISSSSISSSSSSS SSSSi & S & SSSS SSI SSSSSSSSSS SSISS SISI ct- Li- U i i i i i i i i i i 1 i i l 1 i ! 1 i 1 i 1 i i 1 1 i 1 i i i i i 1 i i 'I 1 t i U SSISSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSISSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS u i' f- i 4 d co a) to t) co ''J -t 1 CU '•'IJ Cu 01 t;J 1'll 01 CU 0.1 CIJ 4.i Si 4. 0) r,I S S 4- i' c1 1~ ICJ a3 03 i1 a) co 33 00 4J t1J I'l tr, 00 ;o 03 o - i' -f -f4 -f -f4 ,f4 '. -fN- r-r- r, r, ?. f-- N- NN- 0000) 1 4 0'10n0) -74- -f -- -4 4 4 -- 4 4 4 -ri- - r- r- 4 .44r- C. x Nt~ N- N- NL17i17If) if) If) i17r- r- Li7Li7i1787Li) L17L7 Li) 0Li7 -4- Sr- Li) SSSN1` i) 11-j0ii700117047L170 i17L170p7Li7OJ CC Si ry Si Si Si a) 00 co '13 ' 'L Si S i' i- -4- -4- 4- ii"�' 4 '4- In'7 Si Cl) co CO 00 Si Si a) co I O co CO 1E0 CO CO co '4- 4 4 co CO CO CU CO 1.-- a) 00 00 CO a) I-i1 I'IJ w 1-iJ CU CU a) Vr.J i'IJ CU i'i _"CU Cu CU 01 W 0J CU I-i N- co CU I'` 1- i` co co UJ nJ I'IJ I'IJ IIJ iu 01 CU i-Li I'IJ I-IJ 1U rat fat 0.1 CU r- Z H La LU I La La La a' 111 W W Z Z t i t I LU LU La W La La Ll w LU La Z Z Z Z Z Z Ui LU uJ 111 La La La LU :u LU Lt.i Lii Li LJ La LU LU Lii La La LU LU U I ZZZZZZZZZZ WLi1LaLi ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ W WUJZZZ i Z Z Z Z W W W W W a1 > > % �� I i W W W al W al at W W tii > > > > > > CO W al W W iv W W W W W Lii at ai a, ill al ti ¢ W L IL O 1 > > > > > > > > > > i, 4-' .L ' . 4- CC a CC ci a a > > > > > > > > > > .>r > > > > > > > > -p > > > (Ti i CC CC L a ` CC a CC 1� ;- }- +- ti a CI CI a CC CT I Ci CI IL C II CI CI C CI a II C C .- CL a cI 1 4) 1 J = -' C 5_ 57. 5- 5- i i ' _ -P ¢ 113 1 13 13 13 -0 13 u 13 '0 i, 4-) CI CI 0Cl 0 C i 1 CI 00 ID '0 10 "0 13 13 13 '0 ' 1 v v 13 '0 13 "W 13 3 i CI u Ti D t1) 1- I Ca t 0 0 i I ,, 0 0 =a 0 07 in 0 E.) L3 0 1(1 in 41 51 IfI i1i S. S.- S. L Ij 11 0 IJ CI LI I] CI i I J i I aj 0 I-I IJ Qi G i-i t: G CI a r i 1 i I c i C t r I t; 0 -1 i I fI J✓ . 5- 5- S. `•_ .`,. >•Ci !G rE a i I i=. 0 I'I 0 :I r 0 =t i -t 0 i 0 0 C- 5= it Ij 0 ..0 , 01 1 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 4-) Z -C X X X X al Iii W al al a1 ,-I H+ r-I .--I 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 -I --i X :--+ 3 3 .4) Li i 5- 5. 5- 5. 5. 5_ 5. 5- 5- 5. IS .43 4.1 W at Cu ai 4- 4- Ir 4- 4- JY Y s v 5= C C S_ 5:. 57. 5= k- 5: 5- 5_ k. 5.. L 5_ 5- 5. Qi :' k 5 S 1 Ix I 5. 5. I. i 5- 5 5. 5. 5. 5. rI in In Z 13 13 `+ 4- 4- 4- 4- 4- 4- }. 5- $ i- 5. 5- 5_ 5- 5. 5. 5- 5- 5- 5_ 5- 5,- 5. 5. s. r- i. I! i. 57. 5. -1 MI T >, > >, >, >, >, >, >, >,1J W L1 c 5_ 5:. L. W W W W W W .M '-, '-t •"' >. >, >, X > >, >, >, >, A >, >, >, >, > ti iv 5: .,-! >, >,is1 I- i _i _J J _J _J J J J Z Z Z hi 11 t1 I-• I--3 .1 ''i In i I '7 Y Y Y '.1f ...1 _1 J _I J J _..i .-J J _1 ..J .._i I T� Y. _I Z +-I 1 Li) „ 1`. i+) Ci1 -t 1-. 10 In i17 01 Cr) '.- ,S 1'9 1` If) ,-I N. In t+) :1 N In Si S 4- 'S -4- 4- If) -4 0 0.1 CO Oj -I CIJ CO 4 In CU 'S 0 CO tC 0 03 - t 1 Si +-I ...10J I?J ri ,-, CU 01 0) 'S ....401In ; -1 Si ID -+ t+) S7 Li) ri u] 01 i!7 Si Si OJ i' In Si ,-I ' (U 4- 4 -- 117 u) co U7 u7 01 Li) LID N- 0.)1i1 i- 1 InCnInIn CPGISIDGI '1SGICOCO 00000I COCO00i- 1- CnSicocococ3EnS & S ' ISEDS1 CPCPcOCO 0CDCPCDCP If) 1 ri ,-i ,-ir4 ,-i El t+) El ri ,-i ,-, .-I ri ,-I ri .-i +-I ,-a ,i -i ri ri El ..... CI cr I co co 00 co al coCO CO a) c0 c0 al Om IT Cn En Cn Cn 0_1 Cn 01 Cn In Cn 01 Cm Cn 0) ) Cn En 0) n En 0) C Cn Ir Cn En Cn CP CP CD CD S C1 1P 1 3 tU' iss 1 L- I ? u'1 1 0 u7 7 7 ,,1 I I - 1,- !41 - 1 , : 11 lu .:'� Lj i 1 1 Q L'7L Liz 7 �7 '1J7t1, U7 J7 L• t:, ,17u1 L7ti7 'a° ii1L 1 ti71 J7 ' 3i17L: t11 . . l :i7L71_71y ti :,i; :"-IIn '` Ir ?- LL1 1 In Cn In In CI In In Cn Cm Cn C1 In In Cn In Q1 En In In En In Cn In Cn In En GI En En In In to in cn in In In Cn En In In In in Cn In In En to In >. 1 ,-i r± .-i r1 ,-i .-1 r1 -i -I ri r1 r: rI - r, r1 ,, r, ..s r1 .. si ,-, ri ,j .-1 r1 r, Y. +-I v-1 +--I -i ri r, ri ri r-1 ri ri rt ri ri ,i r4 ri Ef) > L1 1 Z 1 LL 0 1 -'i ,4 ,.ir, -' r, +-I ri ,-, ,-1 ri ri ,-i 01 cJ (LJ (U F IJ 01 01 1-1J F,i 0J r: -1 i ri ri r-I ri rt ri ri rs ,. ri .-I -1 ,-I r+, ri ri (U Cif (U si -t i ,-4 Z N i Et IZ' Y 'W i or s r cc Cr cc IY cc cc or Cr Or Ii OE" 7 at EY iY i: cam' tv is cc c3_' L ce Cr W Er £Y CC C'' E[; or Cr or Et :Y Cr cc CC c'ir Cr or Cr C3 a r, 1 . Si ri i EC 'I1 • Si ~ ' . , R1 & R2 ZONE VS YEAR BUILT - DATA SOURCE, KING CO. ASSESS PUBLIC INFO SYS 02-02-1992 Page 3 ZONE YEAR ST. ADDRESS TAX ACC NO ---- ---- ----- -------------- - ------ R2 1961 824 Index Court NE 245720-0065 R2 1961 829 Index Court NE 245720-0020 R2 1961 832 Index Court NE 245720-0055 | R2 1961 840 Index Court NE 245720-0045 | R2 1961 841 Index Court NE 245720-0105 -�� R1 1961 1016 Kirkland Ave NE 285480-0190 R1 1961 839 Lynnwood Ave NE 807440-0045 R1 1961 1053 Lynnwood Ave NE 285480-0245 R1 1961 1060 Lynnwood Ave NE 285480-0055 R1 1961 1061 Lynnwood Ave NE 285480-0250 R1 1961 1066 Lynnwood Ave NE 285480-0050 R1 1961 1074 Lynnwood Ave NE 285480-0040 R1 1961 1075 Lynnwood Ave NE 285480-0265 R1 1961 1081 Lynnwood Ave NE 285480-0270 "el R2 1962 825 Index Court NE 245720-0015 Ceojp�mry: M$ | R2 1962 836 Index Court NE 245720-0050 \ ' ���vur�� UAQ� �5L4� R1 1963 1010 Kirkland Ave NE 285480-0195 R1 1964 3104 NE10th St 285480-0200 � R1 1967 808 Lynnwood Ave NE 780900-0060 _ TOTAL ---------------------------- Printed 117 of the 135 records. � ' ' [o 9"6� / ���� '-V'' /yn 7~ . ~� -'��� R1 & R2 ZONE VS YEAR BUILT - DATA SOURCE, KING CO. ASSESS PUBLIC INFO SYS 02-0£-1992 Page 1 ZONE YEAR ST. ADDRESS TAX ACC NO ___-____ ' R1 1957 778 Lynnwood Ave NE 780900-0080 R1 1957 852 Lynnwood Ave NE 780900-0030 R1 1958 806 Jefferson Ave NE 8607440-0190 R1 1958 812 Jefferson Ave NE 807440-0195 R1 1958 818 Jefferson Ave NE 807440-0200 R2 1958 819 Jefferson Ave NE 245720-0165 R1 1958 824 Jefferson Ave NE 807440-0205 R1 1958 830 Jefferson Ave NE 8697440-0210 R1 1958 836 Jefferson Ave NE 807440-0215 R2 1958 839 Jefferson Ave NE 245720-0100 R1 1958 842 Jefferson Ave NE 807440-0220 . R2 1958 845 Jefferson Ave NE 245720-0105 R1 1958 755 Kirkland Ave NE 894830-0030 R1 1958 756 Kirkland Ave NE 780900-0090 R1 1958 801 Kirkland Ave NE 807440-0180 R1 1958 804 Kirkland Ave NE 807440-0070 R1 1958 805 Kirkland Ave NE 807440-0175 R1 0958 812 Kirkland Ave NE 807440-0075 R1 1958 813 Kirkland Ave NE 807440-0170 R1 1958 818 Kirkland Ave NE 8697440-06980 R1 1958 819 Kirkland Ave NE 807440-0165 R1 1958 824 Kirkland Ave NE 807440-0085 R1 1958 825 Kirkland Ave NE 807440-0160 R1 1958 830 Kirkland Ave NE 807440-0090 R1 1958 833 Kirkland Ave NE 807440-0155 R1 1958 836 Kirkland Ave NE 807440-0095 R1 1958 839 Kirkland Ave NE 807440-0150 R1 1958 844 Kirkland Ave NE 807440-0100 R1 1958 850 Kirkland Ave NE 807440-0105 R1 1958 856 Kirkland Ave NE 807440-0110 R1 1958 900 Kirkland Ave NE 807440-0115 R1 1958 904 Kirkland Ave NE 807440-0120 R1 1958 908 Kirkland Ave NE 807440-0125 R1 1958 912 Kirkland Ave NE 807440-01369 R1 1958 926 Kirkland Ave NE 807440-0140 R1 1958 1022 Kirkland Ave NE 285480-0185 R1 1958 1028 Kirkland Ave NE 285480-0180 R1 1958 1034 Kirkland Ave NE 285480-0175 R1 1958 782 Lynnwood Ave NE 780900-0075 R1 1958 815 Lynnwood Ave NE 807440-0065 R1 1958 821 Lynnwood Ave NE 807440-0060 R1 1958 824 Lynnwood Ave NE 780900-00569 R1 1958 827 Lynnwood Ave NE 807440-0055 R1 1958 833 Lynnwood Ave NE 807440-0050 R1 1958 834 Lynnwood Ave NE 780900-0050 R1 1958 838 Lynnwood Ave NE 780900-0045 R1 1958 842 Lynnwood Ave NE 78096989-0040 R1 1958 848 Lynnwood Ave NE 780900-0035 R1 1958 851 Lynnwood Ave NE 807440-0035 tiI r q I ` ht� thIhn\ O�Jj r J F— —i . -� :T _ s1 " E '3 , sT 1- L ' ,- I 1 'A .:) tl [ 1ZYh - 12 ) 4 I It 2) Y41 t ``\ / R a riw tc i rn i �! 1 - T'� I I �l ;-4 R WYE 3 R- 1 �_ s - 07-/i/v7- ie—ieN-c--5— -zi— rc-7) er, 1 / 14, 1 ' 1 ! ili:.-. '`i O.- R-3 ^ rz/ z zo,CJG- vst, II I e °t a r 1 s � ..� Z �S t 9 f..I° ., I,a .1Ft1411118 "r 3 I N E o QUA/c.4/3cr` gX Itir� :'� (p_ i 1 + 1 ' - 1 , �' L _.� �\ ;`"� , b, �'i is I. _ I ,j I G 1 \• t'. •,� /T 1' f\ r,;~/ ] , • 14• '' ' r', Wit- 'L— tt ri ,4- A .1 ; 1 I • I ,\? . S< , -TT • t. F.(4.1. ,I•'-'- ,............\ I L ,0 AN2 s ' " 1aJ-� I ,____, _ ..‘, _, -\1„ , ` - , \ 14' ..11 1,. ,y - r_ ., . ,.._ . ..... ., .--------._!,/ ' , ,, , i Crqet a1. I' )3 i t• h � '1 I., I _ iL1L1 II j ,I W I •\ \ \ V , 1 I ti1 _ •�1•7 1. S 1• 13 1 • 1• I• 1y ,i , )lr, ' A0r --1 1) J 22 � C r W PH t c. Z z r-11 I 1 R-1 ' 3 ' — L �° e J` • a `� r ao ,, n/ �a e ,_ r. R_2 r-- r , _ r— ° — • ' — 5 '2- , • --.. „'.11 '1 '4'''"n"..L.j....._ _,.,„..-.."' 1 : HIr,kL ANDS r ' , I , 1 N E CLEW, NTA.RY �.-f.: .� - ,•\I I _:._I „ _ -- 1. . 'T,_ si•'.. ' I ._•t r 1 Sc ►Ic�1�� 1-q a r / P_ I i y '"J I a a 1 s b , 1 4 J f:, " 5 I N E tit 9 T (1 Iv I ll I I .- /:Z1_. •ji� t Ll__ 1 L�i� } . Y r11j1x ' i 14 \? ' . li .. , \------- . (I I r, E . 11_1_1i_il _' I 'I:1 , . 1 J.:- 1:\1 .t a1r< I T ' ,r a, =aL 2 � .. r,; �p1�� !' g y .,rn {p 4 N. • D Z A- yCD �b/scr< xo /o+ off; 4 �` f' `°, 1� �: v W [-nip GTON AVE. 2s1 23Ft I N EXHI �` d . . - i „ ' tNPR • ., .� ;,� �: o fie' -lab- T ITEM C -dam' A z 4, _ ���jjj"' :if_ 4, ., ,,, ^ k ` 1. Gf' �AL, A N „ y I 4J, 1 TRACT"it; `;o • 323.70 co -,,— .'' 51380 35836 r V‘ ils tl ,�;� Vy \ SG sC i 4 EP- , t_ °'Id. l OI t a , N �4 g 'ii 1 0 b0 S X AVE 1d.E�_ '- 7618 lr — :` �_ 3 9!O _ 41.22 /41 7,2 7810 7J , --90--;y' "' o, 1 _ 11I10 la a �— 6 /s N �` m z ° 1 — ^' ",' �. a, sa.7as ssa0/4 v',yQ9�� ,o \ ° i , 411 iD zovo . v��,o `d ' 99. y 6 I N D E X Cl` u , 9 l el 66 20�1 G 5ti p °b ,lGpg4 �a � .7 y�- Ny + IGHLANDS + - Lg ssla �0E H�� • 2j �aj _ o. _ y�J --7 <N ,,. W a's ..0 U s .9V 1 0,1 'er '1' illitfl , ,.. us a 1/ CAJ A C./ '' • / '' p 2•is U�� p1 . m o. A a _ 7 'CI � L U A. S 79./O 9�4 /40._ ----- —gip CO / / ` �/ ''''''' -NI OF " • K%, , N 4, •' ' IJI\i„....it 4 r 11 I. # o, gli;:i 859a I a/�•'/619 � ,� yb�p 14 3� N En I O frZ° jt R 6 a ill 1.isk �Ai,ti. ' _ fLa�y A i; ni tv k `C,. '550 •J 7a w -�` , I t . ://O `i AS IS •• m N O tP (d• N dis --.1 m iv1�^TV N N (� m fV f J -J r. J '4-.l- ---;"le �'�!CD Li) oC1 • ��VV w - v-, 4, _ 0 43 e. ,0 ,13.69 357 ign 73 i"Tnat ,y �- 75.66 75.661 74.'2 73.39 ('''7315�.7 73;9 ( 7330 ?3.38 '355I74.5'' v fiii____,:p `s' , ' J — '^ O+' iPAor 11 Sl.!! T88g 397 6.67 /00.40 �,../ �' �. ,69. 175.01r T /fir • _ — 9•2"' u . � � v)7`sa`tJC/err i It• — I =�30 I 0 ` I_ Y' Q 5Ol n+ ` g 60 �Bs Ilk w :. zsu i , g0 6n sci, _,, � • �,-- -- LYI`t!N W OO D 7s so y �' Mit iiit ' t - AVE- :: ' 'CIt `4 •,: �'3So �, 7' F.75� I 1— .•--•�j --"'tea i �5•� BO 7694 gv.oe o.n ., 9 j/ �f3_ • �/. _ :w C ���-1,1C 11M 1 Li 1 I �^1111(AtI1- i4' !I oll L:. f I,� "/ /� - -a t.2L-4F 4